Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Kleene
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Semiring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
#align_import algebra.algebra.operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"27b54c47c3137250a521aa64e9f1db90be5f6a26"
/-!
# Multiplication and division of submodules of an algebra.
An interface for multiplication and division of sub-R-modules of an R-algebra A is developed.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or semiring) and let `A` be an `R`-algebra.
* `1 : Submodule R A` : the R-submodule R of the R-algebra A
* `Mul (Submodule R A)` : multiplication of two sub-R-modules M and N of A is defined to be
the smallest submodule containing all the products `m * n`.
* `Div (Submodule R A)` : `I / J` is defined to be the submodule consisting of all `a : A` such
that `a • J ⊆ I`
It is proved that `Submodule R A` is a semiring, and also an algebra over `Set A`.
Additionally, in the `Pointwise` locale we promote `Submodule.pointwiseDistribMulAction` to a
`MulSemiringAction` as `Submodule.pointwiseMulSemiringAction`.
## Tags
multiplication of submodules, division of submodules, submodule semiring
-/
universe uι u v
open Algebra Set MulOpposite
open Pointwise
namespace SubMulAction
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) :=
⟨r, (algebraMap_eq_smul_one r).symm⟩
#align sub_mul_action.algebra_map_mem SubMulAction.algebraMap_mem
theorem mem_one' {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
#align sub_mul_action.mem_one' SubMulAction.mem_one'
end SubMulAction
namespace Submodule
variable {ι : Sort uι}
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R]
section Ring
variable {A : Type v} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (S T : Set A) {M N P Q : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
/-- `1 : Submodule R A` is the submodule R of A. -/
instance one : One (Submodule R A) :=
-- Porting note: `f.range` notation doesn't work
⟨LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A)⟩
#align submodule.has_one Submodule.one
theorem one_eq_range : (1 : Submodule R A) = LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A) :=
rfl
#align submodule.one_eq_range Submodule.one_eq_range
theorem le_one_toAddSubmonoid : 1 ≤ (1 : Submodule R A).toAddSubmonoid := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, map_natCast (algebraMap R A) n⟩
#align submodule.le_one_to_add_submonoid Submodule.le_one_toAddSubmonoid
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) :=
LinearMap.mem_range_self (Algebra.linearMap R A) _
#align submodule.algebra_map_mem Submodule.algebraMap_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_one {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_one Submodule.mem_one
@[simp]
theorem toSubMulAction_one : (1 : Submodule R A).toSubMulAction = 1 :=
SetLike.ext fun _ => mem_one.trans SubMulAction.mem_one'.symm
#align submodule.to_sub_mul_action_one Submodule.toSubMulAction_one
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Operations.lean | 107 | 110 | theorem one_eq_span : (1 : Submodule R A) = R ∙ 1 := by |
apply Submodule.ext
intro a
simp only [mem_one, mem_span_singleton, Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.seq.computation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
#align computation Computation
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
-- Porting note: `return` is reserved, so changed to `pure`
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
#align computation.return Computation.pure
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
cases' n with n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
#align computation.think Computation.think
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.thinkN Computation.thinkN
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
#align computation.head Computation.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
#align computation.tail Computation.tail
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
#align computation.empty Computation.empty
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
#align computation.run_for Computation.runFor
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : Sum α (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
#align computation.destruct Computation.destruct
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
#align computation.run Computation.run
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
#align computation.destruct_eq_ret Computation.destruct_eq_pure
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
cases' s with f al
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
#align computation.destruct_eq_think Computation.destruct_eq_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align computation.destruct_ret Computation.destruct_pure
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align computation.destruct_think Computation.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
#align computation.destruct_empty Computation.destruct_empty
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
#align computation.head_ret Computation.head_pure
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
#align computation.head_think Computation.head_think
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
#align computation.head_empty Computation.head_empty
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
#align computation.tail_ret Computation.tail_pure
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
cases' s with f al; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
#align computation.tail_think Computation.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
#align computation.tail_empty Computation.tail_empty
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
#align computation.think_empty Computation.think_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
#align computation.rec_on Computation.recOn
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec`-/
def Corec.f (f : β → Sum α β) : Sum α β → Option α × Sum α β
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.corec.F Computation.Corec.f
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → Sum α β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
cases' o with _ b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
#align computation.corec Computation.corec
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : Sum α γ → Sum β γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
#align computation.lmap Computation.lmap
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : Sum α β → Sum α γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
#align computation.rmap Computation.rmap
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
-- Porting note: this was far less painful in mathlib3. There seem to be two issues;
-- firstly, in mathlib3 we have `corec.F._match_1` and it's the obvious map α ⊕ β → option α.
-- In mathlib4 we have `Corec.f.match_1` and it's something completely different.
-- Secondly, the proof that `Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0` is this function
-- evaluated at `f b`, used to be `rfl` and now is `cases, rfl`.
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → Sum α β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
#align computation.corec_eq Computation.corec_eq
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation-/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s-/
def BisimO : Sum α (Computation α) → Sum α (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
#align computation.bisim_o Computation.BisimO
attribute [simp] BisimO
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s-/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
#align computation.is_bisimulation Computation.IsBisimulation
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
#align computation.eq_of_bisim Computation.eq_of_bisim
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : Computation α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
#align computation.mem Computation.Mem
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
cases' s with f al
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
#align computation.le_stable Computation.le_stable
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
#align computation.mem_unique Computation.mem_unique
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
#align computation.mem.left_unique Computation.Mem.left_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
#align computation.terminates Computation.Terminates
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
#align computation.terminates_iff Computation.terminates_iff
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
#align computation.terminates_of_mem Computation.terminates_of_mem
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
#align computation.terminates_def Computation.terminates_def
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
#align computation.ret_mem Computation.ret_mem
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
#align computation.eq_of_ret_mem Computation.eq_of_pure_mem
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
#align computation.ret_terminates Computation.ret_terminates
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
#align computation.think_mem Computation.think_mem
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
#align computation.think_terminates Computation.think_terminates
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
cases' n with n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
#align computation.of_think_mem Computation.of_think_mem
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
#align computation.of_think_terminates Computation.of_think_terminates
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
#align computation.not_mem_empty Computation.not_mem_empty
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
#align computation.not_terminates_empty Computation.not_terminates_empty
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
#align computation.eq_empty_of_not_terminates Computation.eq_empty_of_not_terminates
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.thinkN_mem Computation.thinkN_mem
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.thinkN_terminates Computation.thinkN_terminates
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.of_thinkN_terminates Computation.of_thinkN_terminates
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
#align computation.promises Computation.Promises
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
#align computation.mem_promises Computation.mem_promises
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
#align computation.empty_promises Computation.empty_promises
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
#align computation.length Computation.length
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
#align computation.get Computation.get
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
#align computation.get_mem Computation.get_mem
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
#align computation.get_eq_of_mem Computation.get_eq_of_mem
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
#align computation.mem_of_get_eq Computation.mem_of_get_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <|
let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s
⟨n + 1, h⟩
#align computation.get_think Computation.get_think
@[simp]
theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.get_thinkN Computation.get_thinkN
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := fun _ => get_eq_of_mem _
#align computation.get_promises Computation.get_promises
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s := by
cases' h with h
cases' h with a' h
rw [p h]
exact h
#align computation.mem_of_promises Computation.mem_of_promises
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
#align computation.get_eq_of_promises Computation.get_eq_of_promises
end get
/-- `Results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def Results (s : Computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ h : a ∈ s, @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
#align computation.results Computation.Results
theorem results_of_terminates (s : Computation α) [_T : Terminates s] :
Results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
#align computation.results_of_terminates Computation.results_of_terminates
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : Computation α) [T : Terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
Results s a (length s) := by rw [← get_eq_of_mem _ h]; apply results_of_terminates
#align computation.results_of_terminates' Computation.results_of_terminates'
theorem Results.mem {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ => m
#align computation.results.mem Computation.Results.mem
theorem Results.terminates {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
#align computation.results.terminates Computation.Results.terminates
theorem Results.length {s : Computation α} {a n} [_T : Terminates s] : Results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
#align computation.results.length Computation.Results.length
theorem Results.val_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
#align computation.results.val_unique Computation.Results.val_unique
theorem Results.len_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
m = n := by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [← h1.length, h2.length]
#align computation.results.len_unique Computation.Results.len_unique
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, Results s a n :=
haveI := terminates_of_mem h
⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
#align computation.exists_results_of_mem Computation.exists_results_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem get_pure (a : α) : get (pure a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
#align computation.get_ret Computation.get_pure
@[simp]
theorem length_pure (a : α) : length (pure a) = 0 :=
let h := Computation.ret_terminates a
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (pure a)).1 h) rfl
#align computation.length_ret Computation.length_pure
theorem results_pure (a : α) : Results (pure a) a 0 :=
⟨ret_mem a, length_pure _⟩
#align computation.results_ret Computation.results_pure
@[simp]
theorem length_think (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s] : length (think s) = length s + 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Nat.find_min' _ (Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h))
· have : (Option.isSome ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates)
revert this; cases' length (think s) with n <;> intro this
· simp [think, Stream'.cons] at this
· apply Nat.succ_le_succ
apply Nat.find_min'
apply this
#align computation.length_think Computation.length_think
theorem results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
haveI := h.terminates
⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
#align computation.results_think Computation.results_think
theorem of_results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results (think s) a n) :
∃ m, Results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 := by
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem)
exact ⟨_, this, Results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩
#align computation.of_results_think Computation.of_results_think
@[simp]
theorem results_think_iff {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ Results s a n :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h
injection e with h'; rwa [h'], results_think⟩
#align computation.results_think_iff Computation.results_think_iff
theorem results_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, Results s a m → Results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => results_think (results_thinkN n h)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.results_thinkN Computation.results_thinkN
theorem results_thinkN_pure (a : α) (n) : Results (thinkN (pure a) n) a n := by
have := results_thinkN n (results_pure a); rwa [Nat.zero_add] at this
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.results_thinkN_ret Computation.results_thinkN_pure
@[simp]
theorem length_thinkN (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.length_thinkN Computation.length_thinkN
theorem eq_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : s = thinkN (pure a) n := by
revert s
induction' n with n IH <;> intro s <;> apply recOn s (fun a' => _) fun s => _ <;> intro a h
· rw [← eq_of_pure_mem h.mem]
rfl
· cases' of_results_think h with n h
cases h
contradiction
· have := h.len_unique (results_pure _)
contradiction
· rw [IH (results_think_iff.1 h)]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.eq_thinkN Computation.eq_thinkN
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] :
s = thinkN (pure (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.eq_thinkN' Computation.eq_thinkN'
/-- Recursor based on membership-/
def memRecOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M]
generalize length s = n
induction' n with n IH; exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
#align computation.mem_rec_on Computation.memRecOn
/-- Recursor based on assertion of `Terminates`-/
def terminatesRecOn
{C : Computation α → Sort v}
(s) [Terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
memRecOn (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
#align computation.terminates_rec_on Computation.terminatesRecOn
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Computation α → Computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map fun o => Option.casesOn o none (some ∘ f), fun n b => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with a <;> intro h
· contradiction
· rw [al e]; exact h⟩
#align computation.map Computation.map
/-- bind over a `Sum` of `Computation`-/
def Bind.g : Sum β (Computation β) → Sum β (Sum (Computation α) (Computation β))
| Sum.inl b => Sum.inl b
| Sum.inr cb' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inr cb'
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.bind.G Computation.Bind.g
/-- bind over a function mapping `α` to a `Computation`-/
def Bind.f (f : α → Computation β) :
Sum (Computation α) (Computation β) → Sum β (Sum (Computation α) (Computation β))
| Sum.inl ca =>
match destruct ca with
| Sum.inl a => Bind.g <| destruct (f a)
| Sum.inr ca' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inl ca'
| Sum.inr cb => Bind.g <| destruct cb
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align computation.bind.F Computation.Bind.f
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : Computation β :=
corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inl c)
#align computation.bind Computation.bind
instance : Bind Computation :=
⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : c >>= f = bind c f :=
rfl
#align computation.has_bind_eq_bind Computation.has_bind_eq_bind
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : Computation (Computation α)) : Computation α :=
c >>= id
#align computation.join Computation.join
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
#align computation.map_ret Computation.map_pure
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw [Stream'.map_cons]
#align computation.map_think Computation.map_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) := by
apply s.recOn <;> intro <;> simp
#align computation.destruct_map Computation.destruct_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ s : Computation α, map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; simp only [map, comp_apply, id_eq]
have e : @Option.rec α (fun _ => Option α) none some = id := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
have h : ((fun x: Option α => x) = id) := rfl
simp [e, h, Stream'.map_id]
#align computation.map_id Computation.map_id
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : ∀ s : Computation α, map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
apply congr_arg fun f : _ → Option γ => Stream'.map f s
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align computation.map_comp Computation.map_comp
@[simp]
theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (pure a) f = f a := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = bind (pure a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨ c₁ = corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inr c₂)
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ =>
simp only [BisimO, bind, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap, destruct_pure]
cases' destruct (f a) with b cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
| _, c, Or.inr rfl =>
simp only [BisimO, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap]
cases' destruct c with b cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
· simp
#align computation.ret_bind Computation.ret_bind
@[simp]
theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [bind, Bind.f]
#align computation.think_bind Computation.think_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (pure ∘ f) = map f s := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind s (pure ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => cases' destruct c₂ with b cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> simp
exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
#align computation.bind_ret Computation.bind_pure
-- Porting note: used to use `rw [bind_pure]`
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure' (s : Computation α) : bind s pure = s := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind s pure ∧ c₂ = s
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => cases' destruct c₂ with b cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
#align computation.bind_ret' Computation.bind_pure'
@[simp]
theorem bind_assoc (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) (g : β → Computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ =>
c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => cases' destruct c₂ with b cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> simp
· generalize f s = fs
apply recOn fs <;> intro t <;> simp
· cases' destruct (g t) with b cb <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
#align computation.bind_assoc Computation.bind_assoc
theorem results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m)
(h2 : Results (f a) b n) : Results (bind s f) b (n + m) := by
have := h1.mem; revert m
apply memRecOn this _ fun s IH => _
· intro _ h1
rw [ret_bind]
rw [h1.len_unique (results_pure _)]
exact h2
· intro _ h3 _ h1
rw [think_bind]
cases' of_results_think h1 with m' h
cases' h with h1 e
rw [e]
exact results_think (h3 h1)
#align computation.results_bind Computation.results_bind
theorem mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨_, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2
(results_bind h1 h2).mem
#align computation.mem_bind Computation.mem_bind
instance terminates_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : Terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
#align computation.terminates_bind Computation.terminates_bind
@[simp]
theorem get_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
#align computation.get_bind Computation.get_bind
@[simp]
theorem length_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [_T1 : Terminates s]
[_T2 : Terminates (f (get s))] : length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique <|
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
#align computation.length_bind Computation.length_bind
theorem of_results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b k} :
Results (bind s f) b k → ∃ a m n, Results s a m ∧ Results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m := by
induction' k with n IH generalizing s <;> apply recOn s (fun a => _) fun s' => _ <;> intro e h
· simp only [ret_bind, Nat.zero_eq] at h
exact ⟨e, _, _, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN h)
contradiction
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, n + 1, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· simp only [think_bind, results_think_iff] at h
let ⟨a, m, n', h1, h2, e'⟩ := IH h
rw [e']
exact ⟨a, m.succ, n', results_think h1, h2, rfl⟩
#align computation.of_results_bind Computation.of_results_bind
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b} (h : b ∈ bind s f) :
∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h
let ⟨a, _, _, h1, h2, _⟩ := of_results_bind h
⟨a, h1.mem, h2.mem⟩
#align computation.exists_of_mem_bind Computation.exists_of_mem_bind
theorem bind_promises {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : s ~> a)
(h2 : f a ~> b) : bind s f ~> b := fun b' bB => by
rcases exists_of_mem_bind bB with ⟨a', a's, ba'⟩
rw [← h1 a's] at ba'; exact h2 ba'
#align computation.bind_promises Computation.bind_promises
instance monad : Monad Computation where
map := @map
pure := @pure
bind := @bind
instance : LawfulMonad Computation := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := @map_id)
(bind_pure_comp := @bind_pure)
(pure_bind := @ret_bind)
(bind_assoc := @bind_assoc)
theorem has_map_eq_map {β} (f : α → β) (c : Computation α) : f <$> c = map f c :=
rfl
#align computation.has_map_eq_map Computation.has_map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem pure_def (a) : (return a : Computation α) = pure a :=
rfl
#align computation.return_def Computation.pure_def
@[simp]
theorem map_pure' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (a), f <$> pure a = pure (f a) :=
map_pure
#align computation.map_ret' Computation.map_pure'
@[simp]
theorem map_think' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (s), f <$> think s = think (f <$> s) :=
map_think
#align computation.map_think' Computation.map_think'
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a} {s : Computation α} (m : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s := by
rw [← bind_pure]; apply mem_bind m; apply ret_mem
#align computation.mem_map Computation.mem_map
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Computation α} (h : b ∈ map f s) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
rw [← bind_pure] at h
let ⟨a, as, fb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
exact ⟨a, as, mem_unique (ret_mem _) fb⟩
#align computation.exists_of_mem_map Computation.exists_of_mem_map
instance terminates_map (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) [Terminates s] : Terminates (map f s) := by
rw [← bind_pure]; exact terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
#align computation.terminates_map Computation.terminates_map
theorem terminates_map_iff (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) : Terminates (map f s) ↔ Terminates s :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨_, h1, _⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
⟨⟨_, h1⟩⟩,
@Computation.terminates_map _ _ _ _⟩
#align computation.terminates_map_iff Computation.terminates_map_iff
-- Parallel computation
/-- `c₁ <|> c₂` calculates `c₁` and `c₂` simultaneously, returning
the first one that gives a result. -/
def orElse (c₁ : Computation α) (c₂ : Unit → Computation α) : Computation α :=
@Computation.corec α (Computation α × Computation α)
(fun ⟨c₁, c₂⟩ =>
match destruct c₁ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₁' =>
match destruct c₂ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₂' => Sum.inr (c₁', c₂'))
(c₁, c₂ ())
#align computation.orelse Computation.orElse
instance instAlternativeComputation : Alternative Computation :=
{ Computation.monad with
orElse := @orElse
failure := @empty }
-- Porting note: Added unfolds as the code does not work without it
@[simp]
theorem ret_orElse (a : α) (c₂ : Computation α) : (pure a <|> c₂) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
#align computation.ret_orelse Computation.ret_orElse
-- Porting note: Added unfolds as the code does not work without it
@[simp]
theorem orElse_pure (c₁ : Computation α) (a : α) : (think c₁ <|> pure a) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
#align computation.orelse_ret Computation.orElse_pure
-- Porting note: Added unfolds as the code does not work without it
@[simp]
theorem orElse_think (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : (think c₁ <|> think c₂) = think (c₁ <|> c₂) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
#align computation.orelse_think Computation.orElse_think
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 942 | 946 | theorem empty_orElse (c) : (empty α <|> c) = c := by |
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (empty α <|> c₂) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import analysis.convex.between from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"571e13cacbed7bf042fd3058ce27157101433842"
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
#align affine_segment affineSegment
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
#align affine_segment_eq_segment affineSegment_eq_segment
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
#align affine_segment_comm affineSegment_comm
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
#align left_mem_affine_segment left_mem_affineSegment
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
#align right_mem_affine_segment right_mem_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
-- Porting note: added as this doesn't do anything in `simp_rw` any more
rw [affineSegment]
-- Note: when adding "simp made no progress" in lean4#2336,
-- had to change `lineMap_same` to `lineMap_same _`. Not sure why?
-- Porting note: added `_ _` and `Function.const`
simp_rw [lineMap_same _, AffineMap.coe_const _ _, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
#align affine_segment_same affineSegment_same
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
#align affine_segment_image affineSegment_image
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vadd_image affineSegment_const_vadd_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_vadd_const_image affineSegment_vadd_const_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vsub_image affineSegment_const_vsub_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_vsub_const_image affineSegment_vsub_const_image
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vadd_affine_segment mem_const_vadd_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vadd_const_affine_segment mem_vadd_const_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vsub_affine_segment mem_const_vsub_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vsub_const_affine_segment mem_vsub_const_affineSegment
variable (R)
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
#align wbtw Wbtw
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
#align sbtw Sbtw
variable {R}
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align wbtw.map Wbtw.map
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
#align function.injective.wbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
#align function.injective.sbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.wbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.sbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vadd_iff wbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vadd_const_iff wbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vsub_iff wbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vsub_const_iff wbtw_vsub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vadd_iff sbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vadd_const_iff sbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vsub_iff sbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vsub_const_iff sbtw_vsub_const_iff
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
#align sbtw.wbtw Sbtw.wbtw
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
#align sbtw.ne_left Sbtw.ne_left
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
#align sbtw.left_ne Sbtw.left_ne
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
#align sbtw.ne_right Sbtw.ne_right
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
#align sbtw.right_ne Sbtw.right_ne
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
#align sbtw.mem_image_Ioo Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align wbtw.mem_affine_span Wbtw.mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
#align wbtw_comm wbtw_comm
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
#align wbtw.symm Wbtw.symm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
#align sbtw_comm sbtw_comm
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
#align sbtw.symm Sbtw.symm
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_left wbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_right wbtw_self_right
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: Originally `simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h`
have ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := h
rw [h₂.symm, lineMap_same_apply]
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
#align wbtw_self_iff wbtw_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_left not_sbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_right not_sbtw_self_right
variable {R}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 321 | 324 | theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by |
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
#align_import data.polynomial.monic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cbdf7b565832144d024caa5a550117c6df0204a5"
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`Monic.mul`, `Monic.map`, `Monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ Subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
#align polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton
theorem not_monic_zero_iff : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
#align polynomial.not_monic_zero_iff Polynomial.not_monic_zero_iff
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ ∀ a b : R, a = b :=
Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans
⟨by
intro
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton], fun h => subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
#align polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton'
theorem Monic.as_sum (hp : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree + ∑ i ∈ range p.natDegree, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm]
suffices C (p.coeff p.natDegree) = 1 by rw [this, one_mul]
exact congr_arg C hp
#align polynomial.monic.as_sum Polynomial.Monic.as_sum
theorem ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_zero] at hq
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp
exact hp rfl
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic Polynomial.ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic
theorem Monic.map [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : Monic p) : Monic (p.map f) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
have : f p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [show _ = _ from hp, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, coeff_map]
suffices p.coeff (p.map f).natDegree = 1 by simp [this]
rwa [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f this)]
#align polynomial.monic.map Polynomial.Monic.map
theorem monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one {b : R} (hp : b * p.leadingCoeff = 1) :
Monic (C b * p) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_C_mul_of_mul_leading_coeff_eq_one Polynomial.monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one
theorem monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one {b : R} (hp : p.leadingCoeff * b = 1) :
Monic (p * C b) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_mul_C_of_leading_coeff_mul_eq_one Polynomial.monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one
theorem monic_of_degree_le (n : ℕ) (H1 : degree p ≤ n) (H2 : coeff p n = 1) : Monic p :=
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : degree p < n => eq_of_zero_eq_one (H2 ▸ (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H).symm) _ _)
fun H : ¬degree p < n => by
rwa [Monic, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, (lt_or_eq_of_le H1).resolve_left H]
#align polynomial.monic_of_degree_le Polynomial.monic_of_degree_le
theorem monic_X_pow_add {n : ℕ} (H : degree p ≤ n) : Monic (X ^ (n + 1) + p) :=
have H1 : degree p < (n + 1 : ℕ) := lt_of_le_of_lt H (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self n))
monic_of_degree_le (n + 1)
(le_trans (degree_add_le _ _) (max_le (degree_X_pow_le _) (le_of_lt H1)))
(by rw [coeff_add, coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H1, add_zero])
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow_add Polynomial.monic_X_pow_add
variable (a) in
theorem monic_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (X ^ n + C a).Monic := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
exact monic_X_pow_add <| degree_C_le.trans Nat.WithBot.coe_nonneg
theorem monic_X_add_C (x : R) : Monic (X + C x) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ monic_X_pow_add_C x one_ne_zero
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_add_C Polynomial.monic_X_add_C
theorem Monic.mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) : Monic (p * q) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then
haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0
Subsingleton.elim _ _
else by
have : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, Ne.symm h0]
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul' this, Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
#align polynomial.monic.mul Polynomial.Monic.mul
theorem Monic.pow (hp : Monic p) : ∀ n : ℕ, Monic (p ^ n)
| 0 => monic_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact (Monic.pow hp n).mul hp
#align polynomial.monic.pow Polynomial.Monic.pow
theorem Monic.add_of_left (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
#align polynomial.monic.add_of_left Polynomial.Monic.add_of_left
theorem Monic.add_of_right (hq : Monic q) (hpq : degree p < degree q) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
#align polynomial.monic.add_of_right Polynomial.Monic.add_of_right
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_left (hp : p.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : q.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hp]
#align polynomial.monic.of_mul_monic_left Polynomial.Monic.of_mul_monic_left
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_right (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : p.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_mul_monic hq]
#align polynomial.monic.of_mul_monic_right Polynomial.Monic.of_mul_monic_right
namespace Monic
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
swap
· rw [h]
exact natDegree_one
have : p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff]
rwa [Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero] at h
rw [this]
rw [← h, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Monic.def.1 hp, C_1]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.degree ≤ 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
rw [← hp.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one Polynomial.Monic.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
nontriviality R
apply natDegree_mul'
simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_mul Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_mul
theorem degree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).degree = (q * p).degree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [degree_mul', hp.degree_mul]
· exact add_comm _ _
· rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.degree_mul_comm Polynomial.Monic.degree_mul_comm
nonrec theorem natDegree_mul' (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_mul']
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_mul' Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_mul'
theorem natDegree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).natDegree = (q * p).natDegree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' h, Polynomial.natDegree_mul', add_comm]
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_mul_comm Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_mul_comm
theorem not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
¬p ∣ q := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' <| right_ne_zero_of_mul h0] at hl
exact hl.not_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align polynomial.monic.not_dvd_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt
theorem not_dvd_of_degree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : degree q < degree p) : ¬p ∣ q :=
Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hp h0 <| natDegree_lt_natDegree h0 hl
#align polynomial.monic.not_dvd_of_degree_lt Polynomial.Monic.not_dvd_of_degree_lt
theorem nextCoeff_mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) :
nextCoeff (p * q) = nextCoeff p + nextCoeff q := by
nontriviality
simp only [← coeff_one_reverse]
rw [reverse_mul] <;>
simp [coeff_mul, antidiagonal, hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff, add_comm,
show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
#align polynomial.monic.next_coeff_mul Polynomial.Monic.nextCoeff_mul
theorem nextCoeff_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).nextCoeff = n • p.nextCoeff := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, zero_smul, ← map_one (f := C), nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).nextCoeff_mul hp, ih, succ_nsmul]
theorem eq_one_of_map_eq_one {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : p.Monic)
(map_eq : p.map f = 1) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
have hdeg : p.degree = 0 := by
rw [← degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f _, map_eq, degree_one]
· rw [hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
have hndeg : p.natDegree = 0 :=
WithBot.coe_eq_coe.mp ((degree_eq_natDegree hp.ne_zero).symm.trans hdeg)
convert eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg
rw [← hndeg, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, hp.leadingCoeff, C.map_one]
#align polynomial.monic.eq_one_of_map_eq_one Polynomial.Monic.eq_one_of_map_eq_one
theorem natDegree_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).natDegree = n * p.natDegree := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).natDegree_mul hp, hn, Nat.succ_mul, add_comm]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_pow Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_pow
end Monic
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_pow_X_add_C [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) (r : R) : ((X + C r) ^ n).natDegree = n := by
rw [(monic_X_add_C r).natDegree_pow, natDegree_X_add_C, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow_X_add_C Polynomial.natDegree_pow_X_add_C
theorem Monic.eq_one_of_isUnit (hm : Monic p) (hpu : IsUnit p) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨q, h⟩ := hpu.exists_right_inv
have := hm.natDegree_mul' (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h)
rw [h, natDegree_one, eq_comm, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact hm.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one.mp this.1
#align polynomial.monic.eq_one_of_is_unit Polynomial.Monic.eq_one_of_isUnit
theorem Monic.isUnit_iff (hm : p.Monic) : IsUnit p ↔ p = 1 :=
⟨hm.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h => h.symm ▸ isUnit_one⟩
#align polynomial.monic.is_unit_iff Polynomial.Monic.isUnit_iff
theorem eq_of_monic_of_associated (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : Associated p q) : p = q := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := hpq
rw [(hp.of_mul_monic_left hq).eq_one_of_isUnit u.isUnit, mul_one]
#align polynomial.eq_of_monic_of_associated Polynomial.eq_of_monic_of_associated
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_multiset_prod_of_monic (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (ht : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (t.map f).prod := by
revert ht
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_; · simp
intro a t ih ht
rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons]
exact (ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)).mul (ih fun _ hi => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi))
#align polynomial.monic_multiset_prod_of_monic Polynomial.monic_multiset_prod_of_monic
theorem monic_prod_of_monic (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic s.1 f hs
#align polynomial.monic_prod_of_monic Polynomial.monic_prod_of_monic
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (t.map f).prod = (t.map fun i => nextCoeff (f i)).sum := by
revert h
refine Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t ih ht => ?_
· simp only [Multiset.not_mem_zero, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false, Multiset.map_zero,
Multiset.prod_zero, Multiset.sum_zero, not_false_iff, forall_true_iff]
rw [← C_1]
rw [nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.sum_cons,
Monic.nextCoeff_mul, ih]
exacts [fun i hi => ht i (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi), ht a (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _),
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ fun b bs => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem bs)]
#align polynomial.monic.next_coeff_multiset_prod Polynomial.Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, nextCoeff (f i) :=
Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod s.1 f h
#align polynomial.monic.next_coeff_prod Polynomial.Monic.nextCoeff_prod
end CommSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem Monic.natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).natDegree = P.natDegree := by
refine le_antisymm (natDegree_map_le _ _) (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ?_)
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_map Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_map
@[simp]
theorem Monic.degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).degree = P.degree := by
by_cases hP : P = 0
· simp [hP]
· refine le_antisymm (degree_map_le _ _) ?_
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hP]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.degree_map Polynomial.Monic.degree_map
section Injective
open Function
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} (hf : Injective f)
theorem degree_map_eq_of_injective (p : R[X]) : degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else
degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [← f.map_zero]; exact mt hf.eq_iff.1 (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h))
#align polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_injective Polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_injective
theorem natDegree_map_eq_of_injective (p : R[X]) : natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_injective hf p)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_map_eq_of_injective Polynomial.natDegree_map_eq_of_injective
theorem leadingCoeff_map' (p : R[X]) : leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_map' Polynomial.leadingCoeff_map'
theorem nextCoeff_map (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).nextCoeff = f p.nextCoeff := by
unfold nextCoeff
rw [natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
#align polynomial.next_coeff_map Polynomial.nextCoeff_map
theorem leadingCoeff_of_injective (p : R[X]) : leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
delta leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map f, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_of_injective Polynomial.leadingCoeff_of_injective
theorem monic_of_injective {p : R[X]} (hp : (p.map f).Monic) : p.Monic := by
apply hf
rw [← leadingCoeff_of_injective hf, hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
#align polynomial.monic_of_injective Polynomial.monic_of_injective
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.monic_map_iff {p : R[X]} : p.Monic ↔ (p.map f).Monic :=
⟨Monic.map _, Polynomial.monic_of_injective hf⟩
#align function.injective.monic_map_iff Function.Injective.monic_map_iff
end Injective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_X_sub_C (x : R) : Monic (X - C x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using monic_X_add_C (-x)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_sub_C Polynomial.monic_X_sub_C
theorem monic_X_pow_sub {n : ℕ} (H : degree p ≤ n) : Monic (X ^ (n + 1) - p) := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add (show degree (-p) ≤ n by rwa [← degree_neg p] at H)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub Polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub
/-- `X ^ n - a` is monic. -/
theorem monic_X_pow_sub_C {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R) {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n - C a).Monic := by
simpa only [map_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add_C (-a) h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub_C Polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub_C
theorem not_isUnit_X_pow_sub_one (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
¬IsUnit (X ^ n - 1 : R[X]) := by
intro h
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp at h
apply hn
rw [← @natDegree_one R, ← (monic_X_pow_sub_C _ hn).eq_one_of_isUnit h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.not_is_unit_X_pow_sub_one Polynomial.not_isUnit_X_pow_sub_one
theorem Monic.sub_of_left {p q : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) :
Monic (p - q) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply hp.add_of_left
rwa [degree_neg]
#align polynomial.monic.sub_of_left Polynomial.Monic.sub_of_left
theorem Monic.sub_of_right {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.leadingCoeff = -1) (hpq : degree p < degree q) :
Monic (p - q) := by
have : (-q).coeff (-q).natDegree = 1 := by
rw [natDegree_neg, coeff_neg, show q.coeff q.natDegree = -1 from hq, neg_neg]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply Monic.add_of_right this
rwa [degree_neg]
#align polynomial.monic.sub_of_right Polynomial.Monic.sub_of_right
end Ring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem not_monic_zero : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) :=
not_monic_zero_iff.mp zero_ne_one
#align polynomial.not_monic_zero Polynomial.not_monic_zero
end NonzeroSemiring
section NotZeroDivisor
-- TODO: using gh-8537, rephrase lemmas that involve commutation around `*` using the op-ring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem Monic.mul_left_ne_zero (hp : Monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) : q * p ≠ 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· simpa [h]
rw [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul, WithBot.add_eq_bot, not_or, degree_eq_bot]
refine ⟨hq, ?_⟩
rw [← hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h
refine (lt_trans ?_ h).ne'
simp
#align polynomial.monic.mul_left_ne_zero Polynomial.Monic.mul_left_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul_right_ne_zero (hp : Monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) : p * q ≠ 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· simpa [h]
rw [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul_comm, hp.degree_mul, WithBot.add_eq_bot, not_or,
degree_eq_bot]
refine ⟨hq, ?_⟩
rw [← hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h
refine (lt_trans ?_ h).ne'
simp
#align polynomial.monic.mul_right_ne_zero Polynomial.Monic.mul_right_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul_natDegree_lt_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} :
(p * q).natDegree < p.natDegree ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· suffices 0 < p.natDegree ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 by simpa [hq, ← h.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one]
exact ⟨fun h => h.ne', fun h => lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) h.symm⟩
· simp [h.natDegree_mul', hq]
#align polynomial.monic.mul_nat_degree_lt_iff Polynomial.Monic.mul_natDegree_lt_iff
theorem Monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} : p * q = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0 <;> simp [h.mul_right_ne_zero, hq]
#align polynomial.monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.Monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff
theorem Monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} : q * p = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0 <;> simp [h.mul_left_ne_zero, hq]
#align polynomial.monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.Monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monic.lean | 486 | 493 | theorem Monic.isRegular {R : Type*} [Ring R] {p : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) : IsRegular p := by |
constructor
· intro q r h
dsimp only at h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hp.mul_right_eq_zero_iff, mul_sub, h, sub_self]
· intro q r h
simp only at h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hp.mul_left_eq_zero_iff, sub_mul, h, sub_self]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_cons Stream'.WSeq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : WSeq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_think Stream'.WSeq.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem dropn_nil (n) : drop (nil : WSeq α) n = nil := by induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_nil Stream'.WSeq.dropn_nil
@[simp]
theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) : drop (cons a s) (n + 1) = drop s n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [drop]
| succ n n_ih =>
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [*, drop]`.
simp [drop, ← n_ih]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_cons Stream'.WSeq.dropn_cons
@[simp]
theorem dropn_think (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by
induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_think Stream'.WSeq.dropn_think
theorem dropn_add (s : WSeq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => congr_arg tail (dropn_add s m n)
#align stream.wseq.dropn_add Stream'.WSeq.dropn_add
theorem dropn_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
symm
apply dropn_add
#align stream.wseq.dropn_tail Stream'.WSeq.dropn_tail
theorem get?_add (s : WSeq α) (m n) : get? s (m + n) = get? (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_add Stream'.WSeq.get?_add
theorem get?_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_tail Stream'.WSeq.get?_tail
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : WSeq α) :=
Seq.join_nil
#align stream.wseq.join_nil Stream'.WSeq.join_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_think (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : join (think S) = think (join S) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, Seq1.ret]
#align stream.wseq.join_think Stream'.WSeq.join_think
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s : WSeq α) (S) : join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, cons, append]
#align stream.wseq.join_cons Stream'.WSeq.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : WSeq α) : append nil s = s :=
Seq.nil_append _
#align stream.wseq.nil_append Stream'.WSeq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.cons_append Stream'.WSeq.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem think_append (s t : WSeq α) : append (think s) t = think (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.think_append Stream'.WSeq.think_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : WSeq α) : append s nil = s :=
Seq.append_nil _
#align stream.wseq.append_nil Stream'.WSeq.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : WSeq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) :=
Seq.append_assoc _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.append_assoc Stream'.WSeq.append_assoc
/-- auxiliary definition of tail over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def tail.aux : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (_, s) => destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail.aux Stream'.WSeq.tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : WSeq α) : destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux := by
simp only [tail, destruct_flatten, tail.aux]; rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
apply congr_arg; ext1 (_ | ⟨a, s⟩) <;> apply (@pure_bind Computation _ _ _ _ _ _).trans _ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.destruct_tail Stream'.WSeq.destruct_tail
/-- auxiliary definition of drop over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def drop.aux : ℕ → Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| 0 => Computation.pure
| n + 1 => fun a => tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux
theorem drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = Computation.pure none
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
show Computation.bind (Computation.pure none) (drop.aux n) = Computation.pure none by
rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none n]
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux_none Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux_none
theorem destruct_dropn : ∀ (s : WSeq α) (n), destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s, 0 => (bind_pure' _).symm
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [← dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_dropn Stream'.WSeq.destruct_dropn
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : WSeq α) [T : Terminates (head (tail s))] :
Terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 <| by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
simp? [tail] at h says simp only [tail, destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨s', h1, _⟩
unfold Functor.map at h1
exact
let ⟨t, h3, _⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h1
Computation.terminates_of_mem h3
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s := by
unfold tail Functor.map at h; simp only [destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨t, tm, td⟩; clear h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map tm with ⟨t', ht', ht2⟩; clear tm
cases' t' with t' <;> rw [← ht2] at td <;> simp only [destruct_nil] at td
· have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _)
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, ht'⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
unfold head at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, md, e⟩; clear h
cases' o with o <;> [injection e; injection e with h']; clear h'
cases' destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am
exact ⟨_, Computation.mem_map (@Prod.fst α (WSeq α) <$> ·) am⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_head_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_head_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_get?_some {s : WSeq α} {a n} (h : some a ∈ get? s n) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => exact ⟨_, h⟩
| succ n IH =>
let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h
exact IH h'
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_nth_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_get?_some
instance productive_tail (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Productive (tail s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_tail]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_tail Stream'.WSeq.productive_tail
instance productive_dropn (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] (n) : Productive (drop s n) :=
⟨fun m => by rw [← get?_add]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_dropn Stream'.WSeq.productive_dropn
/-- Given a productive weak sequence, we can collapse all the `think`s to
produce a sequence. -/
def toSeq (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Seq α :=
⟨fun n => (get? s n).get,
fun {n} h => by
cases e : Computation.get (get? s (n + 1))
· assumption
have := Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ e
simp? [get?] at this h says simp only [get?] at this h
cases' head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h'
have := mem_unique h' (@Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h)
contradiction⟩
#align stream.wseq.to_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq
theorem get?_terminates_le {s : WSeq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (get? s m) := by
induction' h with m' _ IH
exacts [id, fun T => IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates_le Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates_le
theorem head_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (head s) :=
get?_terminates_le (Nat.zero_le n)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} (T : Terminates (get? s n)) :
Terminates (destruct s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).1 <| head_terminates_of_get?_terminates T
#align stream.wseq.destruct_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem mem_rec_on {C : WSeq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s'))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
apply Seq.mem_rec_on M
intro o s' h; cases' o with b
· apply h2
cases h
· contradiction
· assumption
· apply h1
apply Or.imp_left _ h
intro h
injection h
#align stream.wseq.mem_rec_on Stream'.WSeq.mem_rec_on
@[simp]
theorem mem_think (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ think s ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases' s with f al
change (some (some a) ∈ some none::f) ↔ some (some a) ∈ f
constructor <;> intro h
· apply (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).resolve_left
intro
injections
· apply Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ h
#align stream.wseq.mem_think Stream'.WSeq.mem_think
theorem eq_or_mem_iff_mem {s : WSeq α} {a a' s'} :
some (a', s') ∈ destruct s → (a ∈ s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s') := by
generalize e : destruct s = c; intro h
revert s
apply Computation.memRecOn h <;> [skip; intro c IH] <;> intro s <;>
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
intro m <;>
have := congr_arg Computation.destruct m <;>
simp at this
· cases' this with i1 i2
rw [i1, i2]
cases' s' with f al
dsimp only [cons, (· ∈ ·), WSeq.Mem, Seq.Mem, Seq.cons]
have h_a_eq_a' : a = a' ↔ some (some a) = some (some a') := by simp
rw [h_a_eq_a']
refine ⟨Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, fun o => ?_⟩
· cases' o with e m
· rw [e]
apply Stream'.mem_cons
· exact Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· simp [IH this]
#align stream.wseq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem Stream'.WSeq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff (s : WSeq α) (b) {a} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
eq_or_mem_iff_mem <| by simp [ret_mem]
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_iff Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_iff
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {s : WSeq α} (b) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inr h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem mem_cons (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ cons a s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_tail {s : WSeq α} {a} : a ∈ tail s → a ∈ s := by
intro h; have := h; cases' h with n e; revert s; simp only [Stream'.get]
induction' n with n IH <;> intro s <;> induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
simp <;> intro m e <;>
injections
· exact Or.inr m
· exact Or.inr m
· apply IH m
rw [e]
cases tail s
rfl
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_tail Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_tail
theorem mem_of_mem_dropn {s : WSeq α} {a} : ∀ {n}, a ∈ drop s n → a ∈ s
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => @mem_of_mem_dropn s a n (mem_of_mem_tail h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_dropn Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_dropn
theorem get?_mem {s : WSeq α} {a n} : some a ∈ get? s n → a ∈ s := by
revert s; induction' n with n IH <;> intro s h
· -- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, h1, h2⟩
cases' o with o
· injection h2
injection h2 with h'
cases' o with a' s'
exact (eq_or_mem_iff_mem h1).2 (Or.inl h'.symm)
· have := @IH (tail s)
rw [get?_tail] at this
exact mem_of_mem_tail (this h)
#align stream.wseq.nth_mem Stream'.WSeq.get?_mem
theorem exists_get?_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, some a ∈ get? s n := by
apply mem_rec_on h
· intro a' s' h
cases' h with h h
· exists 0
simp only [get?, drop, head_cons]
rw [h]
apply ret_mem
· cases' h with n h
exists n + 1
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [get?]`.
simpa [get?]
· intro s' h
cases' h with n h
exists n
simp only [get?, dropn_think, head_think]
apply think_mem h
#align stream.wseq.exists_nth_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_get?_of_mem
theorem exists_dropn_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ n s', some (a, s') ∈ destruct (drop s n) :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
⟨n, by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ with ⟨⟨o, om⟩⟩
have := Computation.mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ om) h
cases' o with o
· injection this
injection this with i
cases' o with a' s'
dsimp at i
rw [i] at om
exact ⟨_, om⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_dropn_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_dropn_of_mem
theorem liftRel_dropn_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) :
∀ n, Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct (drop s n)) (destruct (drop t n))
| 0 => liftRel_destruct H
| n + 1 => by
simp only [LiftRelO, drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, destruct_tail, tail.aux]
apply liftRel_bind
· apply liftRel_dropn_destruct H n
exact fun {a b} o =>
match a, b, o with
| none, none, _ => by
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨_, h2⟩ => by simpa [tail.aux] using liftRel_destruct h2
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_dropn_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_dropn_destruct
theorem exists_of_liftRel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ R a b := by
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
-- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
let ⟨some (_, s'), sd, rfl⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h
let ⟨some (b, t'), td, ⟨ab, _⟩⟩ := (liftRel_dropn_destruct H n).left sd
exact ⟨b, get?_mem (Computation.mem_map (Prod.fst.{v, v} <$> ·) td), ab⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_left Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_left
theorem exists_of_liftRel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {b} (h : b ∈ t) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ R a b := by rw [← LiftRel.swap] at H; exact exists_of_liftRel_left H h
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_right Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_right
theorem head_terminates_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates (head s) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
head_terminates_of_get?_terminates ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_mem
theorem of_mem_append {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ append s₁ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ :=
Seq.of_mem_append
#align stream.wseq.of_mem_append Stream'.WSeq.of_mem_append
theorem mem_append_left {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ append s₁ s₂ :=
Seq.mem_append_left
#align stream.wseq.mem_append_left Stream'.WSeq.mem_append_left
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} : ∀ {s : WSeq α}, b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b
| ⟨g, al⟩, h => by
let ⟨o, om, oe⟩ := Seq.exists_of_mem_map h
cases' o with a
· injection oe
injection oe with h'
exact ⟨a, om, h'⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_map Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_nil (R : α → β → Prop) : LiftRel R nil nil := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_nil Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_nil
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_cons (R : α → β → Prop) (a b s t) :
LiftRel R (cons a s) (cons b t) ↔ R a b ∧ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_cons Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_cons
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R (think s) t ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_left Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_left
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R s (think t) ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_right Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_right
theorem cons_congr {s t : WSeq α} (a : α) (h : s ~ʷ t) : cons a s ~ʷ cons a t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.cons_congr Stream'.WSeq.cons_congr
theorem think_equiv (s : WSeq α) : think s ~ʷ s := by unfold Equiv; simpa using Equiv.refl _
#align stream.wseq.think_equiv Stream'.WSeq.think_equiv
theorem think_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : think s ~ʷ think t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.think_congr Stream'.WSeq.think_congr
theorem head_congr : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → head s ~ head t := by
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → ∀ {o}, o ∈ head s → o ∈ head t from fun s t h o =>
⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
intro s t h o ho
rcases @Computation.exists_of_mem_map _ _ _ _ (destruct s) ho with ⟨ds, dsm, dse⟩
rw [← dse]
cases' destruct_congr h with l r
rcases l dsm with ⟨dt, dtm, dst⟩
cases' ds with a <;> cases' dt with b
· apply Computation.mem_map _ dtm
· cases b
cases dst
· cases a
cases dst
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
rw [dst.left]
exact @Computation.mem_map _ _ (@Functor.map _ _ (α × WSeq α) _ Prod.fst)
(some (b, t')) (destruct t) dtm
#align stream.wseq.head_congr Stream'.WSeq.head_congr
theorem flatten_equiv {c : Computation (WSeq α)} {s} (h : s ∈ c) : flatten c ~ʷ s := by
apply Computation.memRecOn h
· simp [Equiv.refl]
· intro s'
apply Equiv.trans
simp [think_equiv]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_equiv Stream'.WSeq.flatten_equiv
theorem liftRel_flatten {R : α → β → Prop} {c1 : Computation (WSeq α)} {c2 : Computation (WSeq β)}
(h : c1.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c2) : LiftRel R (flatten c1) (flatten c2) :=
let S s t := ∃ c1 c2, s = flatten c1 ∧ t = flatten c2 ∧ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c1 c2
⟨S, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩, fun {s t} h =>
match s, t, h with
| _, _, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [destruct_flatten]; apply liftRel_bind _ _ h
intro a b ab; apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct ab)
intro a b; apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t h; refine ⟨Computation.pure s, Computation.pure t, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [h, -liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_flatten Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_flatten
theorem flatten_congr {c1 c2 : Computation (WSeq α)} :
Computation.LiftRel Equiv c1 c2 → flatten c1 ~ʷ flatten c2 :=
liftRel_flatten
#align stream.wseq.flatten_congr Stream'.WSeq.flatten_congr
theorem tail_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : tail s ~ʷ tail t := by
apply flatten_congr
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]; rw [← Computation.bind_pure, ← Computation.bind_pure]
apply liftRel_bind _ _ (destruct_congr h)
intro a b h; simp only [comp_apply, liftRel_pure]
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· cases h
· cases a
cases h
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
exact h.right
#align stream.wseq.tail_congr Stream'.WSeq.tail_congr
theorem dropn_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : drop s n ~ʷ drop t n := by
induction n <;> simp [*, tail_congr, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_congr Stream'.WSeq.dropn_congr
theorem get?_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : get? s n ~ get? t n :=
head_congr (dropn_congr h _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_congr Stream'.WSeq.get?_congr
theorem mem_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (a) : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t :=
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → a ∈ s → a ∈ t from ⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
fun {_ _} h as =>
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem as
get?_mem ((get?_congr h _ _).1 hn)
#align stream.wseq.mem_congr Stream'.WSeq.mem_congr
theorem productive_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : Productive s ↔ Productive t := by
simp only [productive_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun n => terminates_congr <| get?_congr h _
#align stream.wseq.productive_congr Stream'.WSeq.productive_congr
theorem Equiv.ext {s t : WSeq α} (h : ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n) : s ~ʷ t :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n, h, fun {s t} h => by
refine liftRel_def.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← head_terminates_iff, ← head_terminates_iff]
exact terminates_congr (h 0)
· intro a b ma mb
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) with
ab
refine ⟨ab, fun n => ?_⟩
refine
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ ma)) n).symm.trans
((?_ : get? (tail s) n ~ get? (tail t) n).trans
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) n))
rw [get?_tail, get?_tail]
apply h⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.ext Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.ext
theorem length_eq_map (s : WSeq α) : length s = Computation.map List.length (toList s) := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s')) (l.length, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map List.length (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l, s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.length_eq_map Stream'.WSeq.length_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem ofList_nil : ofList [] = (nil : WSeq α) :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.of_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.ofList_nil
@[simp]
theorem ofList_cons (a : α) (l) : ofList (a::l) = cons a (ofList l) :=
show Seq.map some (Seq.ofList (a::l)) = Seq.cons (some a) (Seq.map some (Seq.ofList l)) by simp
#align stream.wseq.of_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.ofList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_nil (l : List α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, nil) = Computation.pure l.reverse :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList'_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList'_cons (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) (a : α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, cons a s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (a::l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, cons]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList'_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_think (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, think s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, think]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_think Stream'.WSeq.toList'_think
theorem toList'_map (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a :: l, s')) (l, s) = (l.reverse ++ ·) <$> toList s := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l' : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l' ++ l, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map (l.reverse ++ ·) (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l', s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l', s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_map Stream'.WSeq.toList'_map
@[simp]
theorem toList_cons (a : α) (s) : toList (cons a s) = (List.cons a <$> toList s).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold toList
simp only [toList'_cons, Computation.destruct_think, Sum.inr.injEq]
rw [toList'_map]
simp only [List.reverse_cons, List.reverse_nil, List.nil_append, List.singleton_append]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure [] :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList_nil
theorem toList_ofList (l : List α) : l ∈ toList (ofList l) := by
induction' l with a l IH <;> simp [ret_mem]; exact think_mem (Computation.mem_map _ IH)
#align stream.wseq.to_list_of_list Stream'.WSeq.toList_ofList
@[simp]
theorem destruct_ofSeq (s : Seq α) :
destruct (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure (s.head.map fun a => (a, ofSeq s.tail)) :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
simp only [destruct, Seq.destruct, Option.map_eq_map, ofSeq, Computation.corec_eq, rmap,
Seq.head]
rw [show Seq.get? (some <$> s) 0 = some <$> Seq.get? s 0 by apply Seq.map_get?]
cases' Seq.get? s 0 with a
· rfl
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [destruct]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.destruct_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem head_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : head (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure s.head := by
simp only [head, Option.map_eq_map, destruct_ofSeq, Computation.map_pure, Option.map_map]
cases Seq.head s <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.head_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.head_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem tail_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : tail (ofSeq s) = ofSeq s.tail := by
simp only [tail, destruct_ofSeq, map_pure', flatten_pure]
induction' s using Seq.recOn with x s <;> simp only [ofSeq, Seq.tail_nil, Seq.head_nil,
Option.map_none', Seq.tail_cons, Seq.head_cons, Option.map_some']
· rfl
#align stream.wseq.tail_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.tail_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem dropn_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : ∀ n, drop (ofSeq s) n = ofSeq (s.drop n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
simp only [drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, Seq.drop]
rw [dropn_ofSeq s n, tail_ofSeq]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.dropn_ofSeq
theorem get?_ofSeq (s : Seq α) (n) : get? (ofSeq s) n = Computation.pure (Seq.get? s n) := by
dsimp [get?]; rw [dropn_ofSeq, head_ofSeq, Seq.head_dropn]
#align stream.wseq.nth_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.get?_ofSeq
instance productive_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : Productive (ofSeq s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_ofSeq]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.productive_ofSeq
theorem toSeq_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : toSeq (ofSeq s) = s := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
dsimp [toSeq]; apply get_eq_of_mem
rw [get?_ofSeq]; apply ret_mem
#align stream.wseq.to_seq_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq_ofSeq
/-- The monadic `return a` is a singleton list containing `a`. -/
def ret (a : α) : WSeq α :=
ofList [a]
#align stream.wseq.ret Stream'.WSeq.ret
@[simp]
theorem map_nil (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.map_nil Stream'.WSeq.map_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (cons a s) = cons (f a) (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_cons Stream'.WSeq.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) (s) : map f (think s) = think (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_think Stream'.WSeq.map_think
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : WSeq α) : map id s = s := by simp [map]
#align stream.wseq.map_id Stream'.WSeq.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_ret (f : α → β) (a) : map f (ret a) = ret (f a) := by simp [ret]
#align stream.wseq.map_ret Stream'.WSeq.map_ret
@[simp]
theorem map_append (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (append s t) = append (map f s) (map f t) :=
Seq.map_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_append Stream'.WSeq.map_append
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (s : WSeq α) : map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s) := by
dsimp [map]; rw [← Seq.map_comp]
apply congr_fun; apply congr_arg
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.map_comp Stream'.WSeq.map_comp
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : WSeq α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s :=
Seq.mem_map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.mem_map Stream'.WSeq.mem_map
-- The converse is not true without additional assumptions
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {S : WSeq (WSeq α)}, a ∈ join S → ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s := by
suffices
∀ ss : WSeq α,
a ∈ ss → ∀ s S, append s (join S) = ss → a ∈ append s (join S) → a ∈ s ∨ ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s
from fun S h => (this _ h nil S (by simp) (by simp [h])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _)
intro ss h; apply mem_rec_on h <;> [intro b ss o; intro ss IH] <;> intro s S
· induction' s using WSeq.recOn with b' s s <;>
[induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S; skip; skip] <;>
intro ej m <;> simp at ej <;> have := congr_arg Seq.destruct ej <;>
simp at this; cases this
substs b' ss
simp? at m ⊢ says simp only [cons_append, mem_cons_iff] at m ⊢
cases' o with e IH
· simp [e]
cases' m with e m
· simp [e]
exact Or.imp_left Or.inr (IH _ _ rfl m)
· induction' s using WSeq.recOn with b' s s <;>
[induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S; skip; skip] <;>
intro ej m <;> simp at ej <;> have := congr_arg Seq.destruct ej <;> simp at this <;>
subst ss
· apply Or.inr
-- Porting note: `exists_eq_or_imp` should be excluded.
simp [-exists_eq_or_imp] at m ⊢
cases' IH s S rfl m with as ex
· exact ⟨s, Or.inl rfl, as⟩
· rcases ex with ⟨s', sS, as⟩
exact ⟨s', Or.inr sS, as⟩
· apply Or.inr
simp? at m says simp only [join_think, nil_append, mem_think] at m
rcases (IH nil S (by simp) (by simp [m])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _) with ⟨s, sS, as⟩
exact ⟨s, by simp [sS], as⟩
· simp only [think_append, mem_think] at m IH ⊢
apply IH _ _ rfl m
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_join Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_join
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : WSeq α} {f : α → WSeq β} {b} (h : b ∈ bind s f) :
∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨t, tm, bt⟩ := exists_of_mem_join h
let ⟨a, as, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map tm
⟨a, as, by rwa [e]⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_bind Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_bind
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s : WSeq α) :
destruct (map f s) = Computation.map (Option.map (Prod.map f (map f))) (destruct s) := by
apply
Computation.eq_of_bisim fun c1 c2 =>
∃ s,
c1 = destruct (map f s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map (Option.map (Prod.map f (map f))) (destruct s)
· intro c1 c2 h
cases' h with s h
rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp
exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_map Stream'.WSeq.destruct_map
theorem liftRel_map {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop) {s1 : WSeq α} {s2 : WSeq β}
{f1 : α → γ} {f2 : β → δ} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S (f1 a) (f2 b)) :
LiftRel S (map f1 s1) (map f2 s2) :=
⟨fun s1 s2 => ∃ s t, s1 = map f1 s ∧ s2 = map f2 t ∧ LiftRel R s t, ⟨s1, s2, rfl, rfl, h1⟩,
fun {s1 s2} h =>
match s1, s2, h with
| _, _, ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [exists_and_left, destruct_map]
apply Computation.liftRel_map _ _ (liftRel_destruct h)
intro o p h
cases' o with a <;> cases' p with b <;> simp
· cases b; cases h
· cases a; cases h
· cases' a with a s; cases' b with b t
cases' h with r h
exact ⟨h2 r, s, rfl, t, rfl, h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_map Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_map
theorem map_congr (f : α → β) {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : map f s ~ʷ map f t :=
liftRel_map _ _ h fun {_ _} => congr_arg _
#align stream.wseq.map_congr Stream'.WSeq.map_congr
/-- auxiliary definition of `destruct_append` over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def destruct_append.aux (t : WSeq α) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => destruct t
| some (a, s) => Computation.pure (some (a, append s t))
#align stream.wseq.destruct_append.aux Stream'.WSeq.destruct_append.aux
theorem destruct_append (s t : WSeq α) :
destruct (append s t) = (destruct s).bind (destruct_append.aux t) := by
apply
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ s t, c1 = destruct (append s t) ∧ c2 = (destruct s).bind (destruct_append.aux t))
_ ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩
intro c1 c2 h; rcases h with ⟨s, t, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp
· induction' t using WSeq.recOn with b t t <;> simp
· refine ⟨nil, t, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· exact ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_append Stream'.WSeq.destruct_append
/-- auxiliary definition of `destruct_join` over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def destruct_join.aux : Option (WSeq α × WSeq (WSeq α)) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (s, S) => (destruct (append s (join S))).think
#align stream.wseq.destruct_join.aux Stream'.WSeq.destruct_join.aux
theorem destruct_join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) :
destruct (join S) = (destruct S).bind destruct_join.aux := by
apply
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ S, c1 = destruct (join S) ∧ c2 = (destruct S).bind destruct_join.aux)
_ (Or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl <| rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S <;> simp
· refine Or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_join Stream'.WSeq.destruct_join
theorem liftRel_append (R : α → β → Prop) {s1 s2 : WSeq α} {t1 t2 : WSeq β} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 t1)
(h2 : LiftRel R s2 t2) : LiftRel R (append s1 s2) (append t1 t2) :=
⟨fun s t => LiftRel R s t ∨ ∃ s1 t1, s = append s1 s2 ∧ t = append t1 t2 ∧ LiftRel R s1 t1,
Or.inr ⟨s1, t1, rfl, rfl, h1⟩, fun {s t} h =>
match s, t, h with
| s, t, Or.inl h => by
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct h)
intro a b; apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t; apply Or.inl
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s1, t1, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [LiftRelO, exists_and_left, destruct_append, destruct_append.aux]
apply Computation.liftRel_bind _ _ (liftRel_destruct h)
intro o p h
cases' o with a <;> cases' p with b
· simp only [destruct_append.aux]
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct h2)
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl
· cases b; cases h
· cases a; cases h
· cases' a with a s; cases' b with b t
cases' h with r h
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simpa [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right] using ⟨r, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, t, rfl, h⟩⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_append Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_append
theorem liftRel_join.lem (R : α → β → Prop) {S T} {U : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(ST : LiftRel (LiftRel R) S T)
(HU :
∀ s1 s2,
(∃ s t S T,
s1 = append s (join S) ∧
s2 = append t (join T) ∧ LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel (LiftRel R) S T) →
U s1 s2)
{a} (ma : a ∈ destruct (join S)) : ∃ b, b ∈ destruct (join T) ∧ LiftRelO R U a b := by
cases' exists_results_of_mem ma with n h; clear ma; revert S T ST a
induction' n using Nat.strongInductionOn with n IH
intro S T ST a ra; simp only [destruct_join] at ra
exact
let ⟨o, m, k, rs1, rs2, en⟩ := of_results_bind ra
let ⟨p, mT, rop⟩ := Computation.exists_of_liftRel_left (liftRel_destruct ST) rs1.mem
match o, p, rop, rs1, rs2, mT with
| none, none, _, _, rs2, mT => by
simp only [destruct_join]
exact ⟨none, mem_bind mT (ret_mem _), by rw [eq_of_pure_mem rs2.mem]; trivial⟩
| some (s, S'), some (t, T'), ⟨st, ST'⟩, _, rs2, mT => by
simp? [destruct_append] at rs2 says simp only [destruct_join.aux, destruct_append] at rs2
exact
let ⟨k1, rs3, ek⟩ := of_results_think rs2
let ⟨o', m1, n1, rs4, rs5, ek1⟩ := of_results_bind rs3
let ⟨p', mt, rop'⟩ := Computation.exists_of_liftRel_left (liftRel_destruct st) rs4.mem
match o', p', rop', rs4, rs5, mt with
| none, none, _, _, rs5', mt => by
have : n1 < n := by
rw [en, ek, ek1]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
apply Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
let ⟨ob, mb, rob⟩ := IH _ this ST' rs5'
refine ⟨ob, ?_, rob⟩
· simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [destruct_join, destruct_join.aux]
apply mem_bind mT
simp only [destruct_append, destruct_append.aux]
apply think_mem
apply mem_bind mt
exact mb
| some (a, s'), some (b, t'), ⟨ab, st'⟩, _, rs5, mt => by
simp? at rs5 says simp only [destruct_append.aux] at rs5
refine ⟨some (b, append t' (join T')), ?_, ?_⟩
· simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [destruct_join, destruct_join.aux]
apply mem_bind mT
simp only [destruct_append, destruct_append.aux]
apply think_mem
apply mem_bind mt
apply ret_mem
rw [eq_of_pure_mem rs5.mem]
exact ⟨ab, HU _ _ ⟨s', t', S', T', rfl, rfl, st', ST'⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_join.lem Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_join.lem
theorem liftRel_join (R : α → β → Prop) {S : WSeq (WSeq α)} {T : WSeq (WSeq β)}
(h : LiftRel (LiftRel R) S T) : LiftRel R (join S) (join T) :=
⟨fun s1 s2 =>
∃ s t S T,
s1 = append s (join S) ∧ s2 = append t (join T) ∧ LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel (LiftRel R) S T,
⟨nil, nil, S, T, by simp, by simp, by simp, h⟩, fun {s1 s2} ⟨s, t, S, T, h1, h2, st, ST⟩ => by
rw [h1, h2]; rw [destruct_append, destruct_append]
apply Computation.liftRel_bind _ _ (liftRel_destruct st)
exact fun {o p} h =>
match o, p, h with
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨h1, h2⟩ => by
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simpa [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right] using ⟨h1, s, t, S, rfl, T, rfl, h2, ST⟩
| none, none, _ => by
-- Porting note: `LiftRelO` should be excluded.
dsimp [destruct_append.aux, Computation.LiftRel, -LiftRelO]; constructor
· intro
apply liftRel_join.lem _ ST fun _ _ => id
· intro b mb
rw [← LiftRelO.swap]
apply liftRel_join.lem (swap R)
· rw [← LiftRel.swap R, ← LiftRel.swap]
apply ST
· rw [← LiftRel.swap R, ← LiftRel.swap (LiftRel R)]
exact fun s1 s2 ⟨s, t, S, T, h1, h2, st, ST⟩ => ⟨t, s, T, S, h2, h1, st, ST⟩
· exact mb⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_join Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_join
theorem join_congr {S T : WSeq (WSeq α)} (h : LiftRel Equiv S T) : join S ~ʷ join T :=
liftRel_join _ h
#align stream.wseq.join_congr Stream'.WSeq.join_congr
theorem liftRel_bind {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop) {s1 : WSeq α} {s2 : WSeq β}
{f1 : α → WSeq γ} {f2 : β → WSeq δ} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 s2)
(h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → LiftRel S (f1 a) (f2 b)) : LiftRel S (bind s1 f1) (bind s2 f2) :=
liftRel_join _ (liftRel_map _ _ h1 @h2)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_bind Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_bind
theorem bind_congr {s1 s2 : WSeq α} {f1 f2 : α → WSeq β} (h1 : s1 ~ʷ s2) (h2 : ∀ a, f1 a ~ʷ f2 a) :
bind s1 f1 ~ʷ bind s2 f2 :=
liftRel_bind _ _ h1 fun {a b} h => by rw [h]; apply h2
#align stream.wseq.bind_congr Stream'.WSeq.bind_congr
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,690 | 1,690 | theorem join_ret (s : WSeq α) : join (ret s) ~ʷ s := by | simpa [ret] using think_equiv _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
#align_import data.finset.locally_finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
#align finset.nonempty_Icc Finset.nonempty_Icc
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
#align finset.nonempty_Ico Finset.nonempty_Ico
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
#align finset.nonempty_Ioc Finset.nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
#align finset.nonempty_Ioo Finset.nonempty_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff Finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty Finset.Icc_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty Finset.Ico_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty Finset.Ioc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty Finset.Ioo_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt Finset.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ico_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.left_mem_Icc Finset.left_mem_Icc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and_iff, le_refl]
#align finset.left_mem_Ico Finset.left_mem_Ico
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.right_mem_Icc Finset.right_mem_Icc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.right_mem_Ioc Finset.right_mem_Ioc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
#align finset.left_not_mem_Ioc Finset.left_not_mem_Ioc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
#align finset.left_not_mem_Ioo Finset.left_not_mem_Ioo
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
#align finset.right_not_mem_Ico Finset.right_not_mem_Ico
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
#align finset.right_not_mem_Ioo Finset.right_not_mem_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc Finset.Icc_subset_Icc
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico Finset.Ico_subset_Ico
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_left Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_left
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_left Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_right Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_right Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ioo_left Finset.Ico_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ico_right Finset.Icc_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ico_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ico_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
#align finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left Finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
#align finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right Finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right
variable (a)
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ico_self Finset.Ico_self
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ioc_self Finset.Ioc_self
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ioo_self Finset.Ioo_self
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
#align set.fintype_of_mem_bounds Set.fintypeOfMemBounds
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (c ≤ ·) = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
(Ico a b).filter (b ≤ ·) = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (c ≤ ·) = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
(Icc a b).filter (· < c) = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
#align finset.Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
(Ioc a b).filter (· < c) = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
#align finset.Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : (Iic a).filter (· < c) = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
#align finset.Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a < j ∧ j < b) = Ioo a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo Finset.filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b) = Ioc a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc Finset.filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b) = Ico a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_lt_eq_Ico Finset.filter_le_lt_eq_Ico
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b) = Icc a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_le_eq_Icc Finset.filter_le_le_eq_Icc
end Filter
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ici_self Finset.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Icc_subset_Iic_self Finset.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Iio_self Finset.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Iio_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ico_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Iic_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioi_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
#align bdd_below.finite BddBelow.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
#align set.infinite.not_bdd_below Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : univ.filter (a < ·) = Ioi a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_eq_Ioi Finset.filter_lt_eq_Ioi
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : univ.filter (a ≤ ·) = Ici a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_eq_Ici Finset.filter_le_eq_Ici
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Iio_subset_Iic_self Finset.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
#align bdd_above.finite BddAbove.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
#align set.infinite.not_bdd_above Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : univ.filter (· < a) = Iio a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_gt_eq_Iio Finset.filter_gt_eq_Iio
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : univ.filter (· ≤ a) = Iic a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_ge_eq_Iic Finset.filter_ge_eq_Iic
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
#align finset.disjoint_Ioi_Iio Finset.disjoint_Ioi_Iio
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
#align finset.Icc_self Finset.Icc_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
#align finset.Icc_eq_singleton_iff Finset.Icc_eq_singleton_iff
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
#align finset.Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive Finset.Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_erase_left Finset.Icc_erase_left
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_erase_right Finset.Icc_erase_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Ico_erase_left Finset.Ico_erase_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Ioc_erase_right Finset.Ioc_erase_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_diff_both Finset.Icc_diff_both
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
#align finset.Ico_insert_right Finset.Ico_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
#align finset.Ioc_insert_left Finset.Ioc_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
#align finset.Ioo_insert_left Finset.Ioo_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
#align finset.Ioo_insert_right Finset.Ioo_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ico_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ico_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ioc_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ioc_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Ico_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Ico_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Ioc_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Ioc_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
#align finset.Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive Finset.Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
#align finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ico Finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ico
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
#align finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ioc Finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ioc
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
#align finset.Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo Finset.Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
#align finset.Ico_eq_cons_Ioo Finset.Ico_eq_cons_Ioo
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x ≤ a) = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_le_left
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ico a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
#align finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one Finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one Finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Ico a b).card - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Ioc a b).card - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two
end PartialOrder
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
#align finset.Ici_erase Finset.Ici_erase
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
#align finset.Ioi_insert Finset.Ioi_insert
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
#align finset.not_mem_Ioi_self Finset.not_mem_Ioi_self
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
#align finset.Ici_eq_cons_Ioi Finset.Ici_eq_cons_Ioi
theorem card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one (a : α) : (Ioi a).card = (Ici a).card - 1 := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one Finset.card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_erase [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : (Iic b).erase b = Iio b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm]
#align finset.Iic_erase Finset.Iic_erase
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : insert b (Iio b) = Iic b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm]
#align finset.Iio_insert Finset.Iio_insert
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self {b : α} : b ∉ Iio b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Iio.1 h)
#align finset.not_mem_Iio_self Finset.not_mem_Iio_self
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Iio_insert`. -/
theorem Iic_eq_cons_Iio (b : α) : Iic b = (Iio b).cons b not_mem_Iio_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Iio_insert]
#align finset.Iic_eq_cons_Iio Finset.Iic_eq_cons_Iio
theorem card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one (a : α) : (Iio a).card = (Iic a).card - 1 := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one Finset.card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one
end OrderBot
end BoundedPartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
-- TODO: Why does `id_eq` simplify the LHS here but not the LHS of `Finset.sup_Iic`?
lemma sup'_Iic (a : α) : (Iic a).sup' nonempty_Iic id = a :=
le_antisymm (sup'_le _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup' (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma sup_Iic [OrderBot α] (a : α) : (Iic a).sup id = a :=
le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
lemma inf'_Ici (a : α) : (Ici a).inf' nonempty_Ici id = a :=
ge_antisymm (le_inf' _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1) <| inf'_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma inf_Ici [OrderTop α] (a : α) : (Ici a).inf id = a :=
le_antisymm (inf_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a) <| Finset.le_inf fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1
end SemilatticeInf
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h]
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico b c = Ico a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico Finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) :
Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b c = Ioc a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc h₁ h₂]
#align finset.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc Finset.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico {a b c : α} : Ico a c ⊆ Ico a b ∪ Ico b c := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
theorem Ico_union_Ico' {a b c d : α} (hcb : c ≤ b) (had : a ≤ d) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico' hcb had]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico' Finset.Ico_union_Ico'
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 811 | 813 | theorem Ico_union_Ico {a b c d : α} (h₁ : min a b ≤ max c d) (h₂ : min c d ≤ max a b) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by |
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico h₁ h₂]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.function.l2_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"83a66c8775fa14ee5180c85cab98e970956401ad"
/-! # `L^2` space
If `E` is an inner product space over `𝕜` (`ℝ` or `ℂ`), then `Lp E 2 μ`
(defined in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace`)
is also an inner product space, with inner product defined as `inner f g = ∫ a, ⟪f a, g a⟫ ∂μ`.
### Main results
* `mem_L1_inner` : for `f` and `g` in `Lp E 2 μ`, the pointwise inner product `fun x ↦ ⟪f x, g x⟫`
belongs to `Lp 𝕜 1 μ`.
* `integrable_inner` : for `f` and `g` in `Lp E 2 μ`, the pointwise inner product
`fun x ↦ ⟪f x, g x⟫` is integrable.
* `L2.innerProductSpace` : `Lp E 2 μ` is an inner product space.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {α F : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
theorem Memℒp.integrable_sq {f : α → ℝ} (h : Memℒp f 2 μ) : Integrable (fun x => f x ^ 2) μ := by
simpa [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] using h.norm_rpow two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_sq MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_sq
theorem memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm {f : α → F} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Memℒp f 2 μ ↔ Integrable (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ 2) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
convert (memℒp_norm_rpow_iff hf two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top).symm
· simp
· rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm MeasureTheory.memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm
theorem memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq {f : α → ℝ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Memℒp f 2 μ ↔ Integrable (fun x => f x ^ 2) μ := by
convert memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm hf using 3
simp
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq MeasureTheory.memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq
end
section InnerProductSpace
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure α}
variable {E 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
theorem Memℒp.const_inner (c : E) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (fun a => ⟪c, f a⟫) p μ :=
hf.of_le_mul (AEStronglyMeasurable.inner aestronglyMeasurable_const hf.1)
(eventually_of_forall fun _ => norm_inner_le_norm _ _)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.const_inner MeasureTheory.Memℒp.const_inner
theorem Memℒp.inner_const {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (c : E) : Memℒp (fun a => ⟪f a, c⟫) p μ :=
hf.of_le_mul (AEStronglyMeasurable.inner hf.1 aestronglyMeasurable_const)
(eventually_of_forall fun x => by rw [mul_comm]; exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.inner_const MeasureTheory.Memℒp.inner_const
variable {f : α → E}
theorem Integrable.const_inner (c : E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun x => ⟪c, f x⟫) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢; exact hf.const_inner c
#align measure_theory.integrable.const_inner MeasureTheory.Integrable.const_inner
theorem Integrable.inner_const (hf : Integrable f μ) (c : E) :
Integrable (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢; exact hf.inner_const c
#align measure_theory.integrable.inner_const MeasureTheory.Integrable.inner_const
variable [CompleteSpace E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
theorem _root_.integral_inner {f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (c : E) :
∫ x, ⟪c, f x⟫ ∂μ = ⟪c, ∫ x, f x ∂μ⟫ :=
((innerSL 𝕜 c).restrictScalars ℝ).integral_comp_comm hf
#align integral_inner integral_inner
variable (𝕜)
-- variable binder update doesn't work for lemmas which refer to `𝕜` only via the notation
-- Porting note: removed because it causes ambiguity in the lemma below
-- local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
theorem _root_.integral_eq_zero_of_forall_integral_inner_eq_zero (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hf_int : ∀ c : E, ∫ x, ⟪c, f x⟫ ∂μ = 0) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
specialize hf_int (∫ x, f x ∂μ); rwa [integral_inner hf, inner_self_eq_zero] at hf_int
#align integral_eq_zero_of_forall_integral_inner_eq_zero integral_eq_zero_of_forall_integral_inner_eq_zero
end InnerProductSpace
namespace L2
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
theorem snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top (f : Lp F 2 μ) : snorm (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ (2 : ℝ)) 1 μ < ∞ := by
have h_two : ENNReal.ofReal (2 : ℝ) = 2 := by simp [zero_le_one]
rw [snorm_norm_rpow f zero_lt_two, one_mul, h_two]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg zero_le_two (Lp.snorm_ne_top f)
#align measure_theory.L2.snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top MeasureTheory.L2.snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L2Space.lean | 124 | 140 | theorem snorm_inner_lt_top (f g : α →₂[μ] E) : snorm (fun x : α => ⟪f x, g x⟫) 1 μ < ∞ := by |
have h : ∀ x, ‖⟪f x, g x⟫‖ ≤ ‖‖f x‖ ^ (2 : ℝ) + ‖g x‖ ^ (2 : ℝ)‖ := by
intro x
rw [← @Nat.cast_two ℝ, Real.rpow_natCast, Real.rpow_natCast]
calc
‖⟪f x, g x⟫‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ * ‖g x‖ := norm_inner_le_norm _ _
_ ≤ 2 * ‖f x‖ * ‖g x‖ :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_mul_of_one_le_left (norm_nonneg _) one_le_two)
(norm_nonneg _))
-- TODO(kmill): the type ascription is getting around an elaboration error
_ ≤ ‖(‖f x‖ ^ 2 + ‖g x‖ ^ 2 : ℝ)‖ := (two_mul_le_add_sq _ _).trans (le_abs_self _)
refine (snorm_mono_ae (ae_of_all _ h)).trans_lt ((snorm_add_le ?_ ?_ le_rfl).trans_lt ?_)
· exact ((Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).norm.aemeasurable.pow_const _).aestronglyMeasurable
· exact ((Lp.aestronglyMeasurable g).norm.aemeasurable.pow_const _).aestronglyMeasurable
rw [ENNReal.add_lt_top]
exact ⟨snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top f, snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top g⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_cons Stream'.WSeq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : WSeq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_think Stream'.WSeq.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem dropn_nil (n) : drop (nil : WSeq α) n = nil := by induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_nil Stream'.WSeq.dropn_nil
@[simp]
theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) : drop (cons a s) (n + 1) = drop s n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [drop]
| succ n n_ih =>
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [*, drop]`.
simp [drop, ← n_ih]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_cons Stream'.WSeq.dropn_cons
@[simp]
theorem dropn_think (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by
induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_think Stream'.WSeq.dropn_think
theorem dropn_add (s : WSeq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => congr_arg tail (dropn_add s m n)
#align stream.wseq.dropn_add Stream'.WSeq.dropn_add
theorem dropn_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
symm
apply dropn_add
#align stream.wseq.dropn_tail Stream'.WSeq.dropn_tail
theorem get?_add (s : WSeq α) (m n) : get? s (m + n) = get? (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_add Stream'.WSeq.get?_add
theorem get?_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_tail Stream'.WSeq.get?_tail
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : WSeq α) :=
Seq.join_nil
#align stream.wseq.join_nil Stream'.WSeq.join_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_think (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : join (think S) = think (join S) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, Seq1.ret]
#align stream.wseq.join_think Stream'.WSeq.join_think
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s : WSeq α) (S) : join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, cons, append]
#align stream.wseq.join_cons Stream'.WSeq.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : WSeq α) : append nil s = s :=
Seq.nil_append _
#align stream.wseq.nil_append Stream'.WSeq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.cons_append Stream'.WSeq.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem think_append (s t : WSeq α) : append (think s) t = think (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.think_append Stream'.WSeq.think_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : WSeq α) : append s nil = s :=
Seq.append_nil _
#align stream.wseq.append_nil Stream'.WSeq.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : WSeq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) :=
Seq.append_assoc _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.append_assoc Stream'.WSeq.append_assoc
/-- auxiliary definition of tail over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def tail.aux : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (_, s) => destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail.aux Stream'.WSeq.tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : WSeq α) : destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux := by
simp only [tail, destruct_flatten, tail.aux]; rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
apply congr_arg; ext1 (_ | ⟨a, s⟩) <;> apply (@pure_bind Computation _ _ _ _ _ _).trans _ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.destruct_tail Stream'.WSeq.destruct_tail
/-- auxiliary definition of drop over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def drop.aux : ℕ → Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| 0 => Computation.pure
| n + 1 => fun a => tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux
theorem drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = Computation.pure none
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
show Computation.bind (Computation.pure none) (drop.aux n) = Computation.pure none by
rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none n]
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux_none Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux_none
theorem destruct_dropn : ∀ (s : WSeq α) (n), destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s, 0 => (bind_pure' _).symm
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [← dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_dropn Stream'.WSeq.destruct_dropn
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : WSeq α) [T : Terminates (head (tail s))] :
Terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 <| by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
simp? [tail] at h says simp only [tail, destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨s', h1, _⟩
unfold Functor.map at h1
exact
let ⟨t, h3, _⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h1
Computation.terminates_of_mem h3
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s := by
unfold tail Functor.map at h; simp only [destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨t, tm, td⟩; clear h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map tm with ⟨t', ht', ht2⟩; clear tm
cases' t' with t' <;> rw [← ht2] at td <;> simp only [destruct_nil] at td
· have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _)
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, ht'⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
unfold head at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, md, e⟩; clear h
cases' o with o <;> [injection e; injection e with h']; clear h'
cases' destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am
exact ⟨_, Computation.mem_map (@Prod.fst α (WSeq α) <$> ·) am⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_head_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_head_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_get?_some {s : WSeq α} {a n} (h : some a ∈ get? s n) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => exact ⟨_, h⟩
| succ n IH =>
let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h
exact IH h'
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_nth_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_get?_some
instance productive_tail (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Productive (tail s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_tail]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_tail Stream'.WSeq.productive_tail
instance productive_dropn (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] (n) : Productive (drop s n) :=
⟨fun m => by rw [← get?_add]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_dropn Stream'.WSeq.productive_dropn
/-- Given a productive weak sequence, we can collapse all the `think`s to
produce a sequence. -/
def toSeq (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Seq α :=
⟨fun n => (get? s n).get,
fun {n} h => by
cases e : Computation.get (get? s (n + 1))
· assumption
have := Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ e
simp? [get?] at this h says simp only [get?] at this h
cases' head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h'
have := mem_unique h' (@Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h)
contradiction⟩
#align stream.wseq.to_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq
theorem get?_terminates_le {s : WSeq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (get? s m) := by
induction' h with m' _ IH
exacts [id, fun T => IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates_le Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates_le
theorem head_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (head s) :=
get?_terminates_le (Nat.zero_le n)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} (T : Terminates (get? s n)) :
Terminates (destruct s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).1 <| head_terminates_of_get?_terminates T
#align stream.wseq.destruct_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem mem_rec_on {C : WSeq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s'))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
apply Seq.mem_rec_on M
intro o s' h; cases' o with b
· apply h2
cases h
· contradiction
· assumption
· apply h1
apply Or.imp_left _ h
intro h
injection h
#align stream.wseq.mem_rec_on Stream'.WSeq.mem_rec_on
@[simp]
theorem mem_think (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ think s ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases' s with f al
change (some (some a) ∈ some none::f) ↔ some (some a) ∈ f
constructor <;> intro h
· apply (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).resolve_left
intro
injections
· apply Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ h
#align stream.wseq.mem_think Stream'.WSeq.mem_think
theorem eq_or_mem_iff_mem {s : WSeq α} {a a' s'} :
some (a', s') ∈ destruct s → (a ∈ s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s') := by
generalize e : destruct s = c; intro h
revert s
apply Computation.memRecOn h <;> [skip; intro c IH] <;> intro s <;>
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
intro m <;>
have := congr_arg Computation.destruct m <;>
simp at this
· cases' this with i1 i2
rw [i1, i2]
cases' s' with f al
dsimp only [cons, (· ∈ ·), WSeq.Mem, Seq.Mem, Seq.cons]
have h_a_eq_a' : a = a' ↔ some (some a) = some (some a') := by simp
rw [h_a_eq_a']
refine ⟨Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, fun o => ?_⟩
· cases' o with e m
· rw [e]
apply Stream'.mem_cons
· exact Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· simp [IH this]
#align stream.wseq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem Stream'.WSeq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff (s : WSeq α) (b) {a} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
eq_or_mem_iff_mem <| by simp [ret_mem]
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_iff Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_iff
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {s : WSeq α} (b) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inr h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem mem_cons (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ cons a s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_tail {s : WSeq α} {a} : a ∈ tail s → a ∈ s := by
intro h; have := h; cases' h with n e; revert s; simp only [Stream'.get]
induction' n with n IH <;> intro s <;> induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
simp <;> intro m e <;>
injections
· exact Or.inr m
· exact Or.inr m
· apply IH m
rw [e]
cases tail s
rfl
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_tail Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_tail
theorem mem_of_mem_dropn {s : WSeq α} {a} : ∀ {n}, a ∈ drop s n → a ∈ s
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => @mem_of_mem_dropn s a n (mem_of_mem_tail h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_dropn Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_dropn
theorem get?_mem {s : WSeq α} {a n} : some a ∈ get? s n → a ∈ s := by
revert s; induction' n with n IH <;> intro s h
· -- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, h1, h2⟩
cases' o with o
· injection h2
injection h2 with h'
cases' o with a' s'
exact (eq_or_mem_iff_mem h1).2 (Or.inl h'.symm)
· have := @IH (tail s)
rw [get?_tail] at this
exact mem_of_mem_tail (this h)
#align stream.wseq.nth_mem Stream'.WSeq.get?_mem
theorem exists_get?_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, some a ∈ get? s n := by
apply mem_rec_on h
· intro a' s' h
cases' h with h h
· exists 0
simp only [get?, drop, head_cons]
rw [h]
apply ret_mem
· cases' h with n h
exists n + 1
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [get?]`.
simpa [get?]
· intro s' h
cases' h with n h
exists n
simp only [get?, dropn_think, head_think]
apply think_mem h
#align stream.wseq.exists_nth_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_get?_of_mem
theorem exists_dropn_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ n s', some (a, s') ∈ destruct (drop s n) :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
⟨n, by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ with ⟨⟨o, om⟩⟩
have := Computation.mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ om) h
cases' o with o
· injection this
injection this with i
cases' o with a' s'
dsimp at i
rw [i] at om
exact ⟨_, om⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_dropn_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_dropn_of_mem
theorem liftRel_dropn_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) :
∀ n, Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct (drop s n)) (destruct (drop t n))
| 0 => liftRel_destruct H
| n + 1 => by
simp only [LiftRelO, drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, destruct_tail, tail.aux]
apply liftRel_bind
· apply liftRel_dropn_destruct H n
exact fun {a b} o =>
match a, b, o with
| none, none, _ => by
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨_, h2⟩ => by simpa [tail.aux] using liftRel_destruct h2
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_dropn_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_dropn_destruct
theorem exists_of_liftRel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ R a b := by
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
-- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
let ⟨some (_, s'), sd, rfl⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h
let ⟨some (b, t'), td, ⟨ab, _⟩⟩ := (liftRel_dropn_destruct H n).left sd
exact ⟨b, get?_mem (Computation.mem_map (Prod.fst.{v, v} <$> ·) td), ab⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_left Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_left
theorem exists_of_liftRel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {b} (h : b ∈ t) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ R a b := by rw [← LiftRel.swap] at H; exact exists_of_liftRel_left H h
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_right Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_right
theorem head_terminates_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates (head s) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
head_terminates_of_get?_terminates ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_mem
theorem of_mem_append {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ append s₁ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ :=
Seq.of_mem_append
#align stream.wseq.of_mem_append Stream'.WSeq.of_mem_append
theorem mem_append_left {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ append s₁ s₂ :=
Seq.mem_append_left
#align stream.wseq.mem_append_left Stream'.WSeq.mem_append_left
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} : ∀ {s : WSeq α}, b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b
| ⟨g, al⟩, h => by
let ⟨o, om, oe⟩ := Seq.exists_of_mem_map h
cases' o with a
· injection oe
injection oe with h'
exact ⟨a, om, h'⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_map Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_nil (R : α → β → Prop) : LiftRel R nil nil := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_nil Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_nil
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_cons (R : α → β → Prop) (a b s t) :
LiftRel R (cons a s) (cons b t) ↔ R a b ∧ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_cons Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_cons
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R (think s) t ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_left Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_left
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R s (think t) ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_right Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_right
theorem cons_congr {s t : WSeq α} (a : α) (h : s ~ʷ t) : cons a s ~ʷ cons a t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.cons_congr Stream'.WSeq.cons_congr
theorem think_equiv (s : WSeq α) : think s ~ʷ s := by unfold Equiv; simpa using Equiv.refl _
#align stream.wseq.think_equiv Stream'.WSeq.think_equiv
theorem think_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : think s ~ʷ think t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.think_congr Stream'.WSeq.think_congr
theorem head_congr : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → head s ~ head t := by
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → ∀ {o}, o ∈ head s → o ∈ head t from fun s t h o =>
⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
intro s t h o ho
rcases @Computation.exists_of_mem_map _ _ _ _ (destruct s) ho with ⟨ds, dsm, dse⟩
rw [← dse]
cases' destruct_congr h with l r
rcases l dsm with ⟨dt, dtm, dst⟩
cases' ds with a <;> cases' dt with b
· apply Computation.mem_map _ dtm
· cases b
cases dst
· cases a
cases dst
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
rw [dst.left]
exact @Computation.mem_map _ _ (@Functor.map _ _ (α × WSeq α) _ Prod.fst)
(some (b, t')) (destruct t) dtm
#align stream.wseq.head_congr Stream'.WSeq.head_congr
theorem flatten_equiv {c : Computation (WSeq α)} {s} (h : s ∈ c) : flatten c ~ʷ s := by
apply Computation.memRecOn h
· simp [Equiv.refl]
· intro s'
apply Equiv.trans
simp [think_equiv]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_equiv Stream'.WSeq.flatten_equiv
theorem liftRel_flatten {R : α → β → Prop} {c1 : Computation (WSeq α)} {c2 : Computation (WSeq β)}
(h : c1.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c2) : LiftRel R (flatten c1) (flatten c2) :=
let S s t := ∃ c1 c2, s = flatten c1 ∧ t = flatten c2 ∧ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c1 c2
⟨S, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩, fun {s t} h =>
match s, t, h with
| _, _, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [destruct_flatten]; apply liftRel_bind _ _ h
intro a b ab; apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct ab)
intro a b; apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t h; refine ⟨Computation.pure s, Computation.pure t, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [h, -liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_flatten Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_flatten
theorem flatten_congr {c1 c2 : Computation (WSeq α)} :
Computation.LiftRel Equiv c1 c2 → flatten c1 ~ʷ flatten c2 :=
liftRel_flatten
#align stream.wseq.flatten_congr Stream'.WSeq.flatten_congr
theorem tail_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : tail s ~ʷ tail t := by
apply flatten_congr
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]; rw [← Computation.bind_pure, ← Computation.bind_pure]
apply liftRel_bind _ _ (destruct_congr h)
intro a b h; simp only [comp_apply, liftRel_pure]
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· cases h
· cases a
cases h
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
exact h.right
#align stream.wseq.tail_congr Stream'.WSeq.tail_congr
theorem dropn_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : drop s n ~ʷ drop t n := by
induction n <;> simp [*, tail_congr, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_congr Stream'.WSeq.dropn_congr
theorem get?_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : get? s n ~ get? t n :=
head_congr (dropn_congr h _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_congr Stream'.WSeq.get?_congr
theorem mem_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (a) : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t :=
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → a ∈ s → a ∈ t from ⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
fun {_ _} h as =>
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem as
get?_mem ((get?_congr h _ _).1 hn)
#align stream.wseq.mem_congr Stream'.WSeq.mem_congr
theorem productive_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : Productive s ↔ Productive t := by
simp only [productive_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun n => terminates_congr <| get?_congr h _
#align stream.wseq.productive_congr Stream'.WSeq.productive_congr
theorem Equiv.ext {s t : WSeq α} (h : ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n) : s ~ʷ t :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n, h, fun {s t} h => by
refine liftRel_def.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← head_terminates_iff, ← head_terminates_iff]
exact terminates_congr (h 0)
· intro a b ma mb
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) with
ab
refine ⟨ab, fun n => ?_⟩
refine
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ ma)) n).symm.trans
((?_ : get? (tail s) n ~ get? (tail t) n).trans
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) n))
rw [get?_tail, get?_tail]
apply h⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.ext Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.ext
theorem length_eq_map (s : WSeq α) : length s = Computation.map List.length (toList s) := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s')) (l.length, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map List.length (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l, s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.length_eq_map Stream'.WSeq.length_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem ofList_nil : ofList [] = (nil : WSeq α) :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.of_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.ofList_nil
@[simp]
theorem ofList_cons (a : α) (l) : ofList (a::l) = cons a (ofList l) :=
show Seq.map some (Seq.ofList (a::l)) = Seq.cons (some a) (Seq.map some (Seq.ofList l)) by simp
#align stream.wseq.of_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.ofList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_nil (l : List α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, nil) = Computation.pure l.reverse :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList'_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList'_cons (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) (a : α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, cons a s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (a::l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, cons]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList'_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_think (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, think s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, think]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_think Stream'.WSeq.toList'_think
theorem toList'_map (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a :: l, s')) (l, s) = (l.reverse ++ ·) <$> toList s := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l' : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l' ++ l, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map (l.reverse ++ ·) (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l', s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l', s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_map Stream'.WSeq.toList'_map
@[simp]
theorem toList_cons (a : α) (s) : toList (cons a s) = (List.cons a <$> toList s).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold toList
simp only [toList'_cons, Computation.destruct_think, Sum.inr.injEq]
rw [toList'_map]
simp only [List.reverse_cons, List.reverse_nil, List.nil_append, List.singleton_append]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure [] :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList_nil
theorem toList_ofList (l : List α) : l ∈ toList (ofList l) := by
induction' l with a l IH <;> simp [ret_mem]; exact think_mem (Computation.mem_map _ IH)
#align stream.wseq.to_list_of_list Stream'.WSeq.toList_ofList
@[simp]
theorem destruct_ofSeq (s : Seq α) :
destruct (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure (s.head.map fun a => (a, ofSeq s.tail)) :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
simp only [destruct, Seq.destruct, Option.map_eq_map, ofSeq, Computation.corec_eq, rmap,
Seq.head]
rw [show Seq.get? (some <$> s) 0 = some <$> Seq.get? s 0 by apply Seq.map_get?]
cases' Seq.get? s 0 with a
· rfl
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [destruct]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.destruct_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem head_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : head (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure s.head := by
simp only [head, Option.map_eq_map, destruct_ofSeq, Computation.map_pure, Option.map_map]
cases Seq.head s <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.head_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.head_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem tail_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : tail (ofSeq s) = ofSeq s.tail := by
simp only [tail, destruct_ofSeq, map_pure', flatten_pure]
induction' s using Seq.recOn with x s <;> simp only [ofSeq, Seq.tail_nil, Seq.head_nil,
Option.map_none', Seq.tail_cons, Seq.head_cons, Option.map_some']
· rfl
#align stream.wseq.tail_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.tail_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem dropn_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : ∀ n, drop (ofSeq s) n = ofSeq (s.drop n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
simp only [drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, Seq.drop]
rw [dropn_ofSeq s n, tail_ofSeq]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.dropn_ofSeq
theorem get?_ofSeq (s : Seq α) (n) : get? (ofSeq s) n = Computation.pure (Seq.get? s n) := by
dsimp [get?]; rw [dropn_ofSeq, head_ofSeq, Seq.head_dropn]
#align stream.wseq.nth_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.get?_ofSeq
instance productive_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : Productive (ofSeq s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_ofSeq]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.productive_ofSeq
theorem toSeq_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : toSeq (ofSeq s) = s := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
dsimp [toSeq]; apply get_eq_of_mem
rw [get?_ofSeq]; apply ret_mem
#align stream.wseq.to_seq_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq_ofSeq
/-- The monadic `return a` is a singleton list containing `a`. -/
def ret (a : α) : WSeq α :=
ofList [a]
#align stream.wseq.ret Stream'.WSeq.ret
@[simp]
theorem map_nil (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.map_nil Stream'.WSeq.map_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (cons a s) = cons (f a) (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_cons Stream'.WSeq.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) (s) : map f (think s) = think (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_think Stream'.WSeq.map_think
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : WSeq α) : map id s = s := by simp [map]
#align stream.wseq.map_id Stream'.WSeq.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_ret (f : α → β) (a) : map f (ret a) = ret (f a) := by simp [ret]
#align stream.wseq.map_ret Stream'.WSeq.map_ret
@[simp]
theorem map_append (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (append s t) = append (map f s) (map f t) :=
Seq.map_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_append Stream'.WSeq.map_append
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (s : WSeq α) : map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s) := by
dsimp [map]; rw [← Seq.map_comp]
apply congr_fun; apply congr_arg
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.map_comp Stream'.WSeq.map_comp
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : WSeq α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s :=
Seq.mem_map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.mem_map Stream'.WSeq.mem_map
-- The converse is not true without additional assumptions
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,442 | 1,475 | theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {S : WSeq (WSeq α)}, a ∈ join S → ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s := by |
suffices
∀ ss : WSeq α,
a ∈ ss → ∀ s S, append s (join S) = ss → a ∈ append s (join S) → a ∈ s ∨ ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s
from fun S h => (this _ h nil S (by simp) (by simp [h])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _)
intro ss h; apply mem_rec_on h <;> [intro b ss o; intro ss IH] <;> intro s S
· induction' s using WSeq.recOn with b' s s <;>
[induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S; skip; skip] <;>
intro ej m <;> simp at ej <;> have := congr_arg Seq.destruct ej <;>
simp at this; cases this
substs b' ss
simp? at m ⊢ says simp only [cons_append, mem_cons_iff] at m ⊢
cases' o with e IH
· simp [e]
cases' m with e m
· simp [e]
exact Or.imp_left Or.inr (IH _ _ rfl m)
· induction' s using WSeq.recOn with b' s s <;>
[induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S; skip; skip] <;>
intro ej m <;> simp at ej <;> have := congr_arg Seq.destruct ej <;> simp at this <;>
subst ss
· apply Or.inr
-- Porting note: `exists_eq_or_imp` should be excluded.
simp [-exists_eq_or_imp] at m ⊢
cases' IH s S rfl m with as ex
· exact ⟨s, Or.inl rfl, as⟩
· rcases ex with ⟨s', sS, as⟩
exact ⟨s', Or.inr sS, as⟩
· apply Or.inr
simp? at m says simp only [join_think, nil_append, mem_think] at m
rcases (IH nil S (by simp) (by simp [m])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _) with ⟨s, sS, as⟩
exact ⟨s, by simp [sS], as⟩
· simp only [think_append, mem_think] at m IH ⊢
apply IH _ _ rfl m
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
/-!
# Some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition
This file contains some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition.
Most of them are generalized from the same result assuming the base ring being division ring,
and are moved from the files `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean`
and `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FiniteDimensional.lean`.
-/
open Cardinal Submodule Set FiniteDimensional
universe u v
section Module
variable {K : Type u} {V : Type v} [Ring K] [StrongRankCondition K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
/-- The `ι` indexed basis on `V`, where `ι` is an empty type and `V` is zero-dimensional.
See also `FiniteDimensional.finBasis`.
-/
noncomputable def Basis.ofRankEqZero [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) : Basis ι K V :=
haveI : Subsingleton V := by
obtain ⟨_, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (hV ▸ b.mk_eq_rank'')
exact b.repr.toEquiv.subsingleton
Basis.empty _
#align basis.of_rank_eq_zero Basis.ofRankEqZero
@[simp]
theorem Basis.ofRankEqZero_apply [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) (i : ι) : Basis.ofRankEqZero hV i = 0 := rfl
#align basis.of_rank_eq_zero_apply Basis.ofRankEqZero_apply
theorem le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent [Module.Free K V] {c : Cardinal} :
c ≤ Module.rank K V ↔ ∃ s : Set V, #s = c ∧ LinearIndependent K ((↑) : s → V) := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨κ, t'⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
let t := t'.reindexRange
have : LinearIndependent K ((↑) : Set.range t' → V) := by
convert t.linearIndependent
ext; exact (Basis.reindexRange_apply _ _).symm
rw [← t.mk_eq_rank'', le_mk_iff_exists_subset] at h
rcases h with ⟨s, hst, hsc⟩
exact ⟨s, hsc, this.mono hst⟩
· rintro ⟨s, rfl, si⟩
exact si.cardinal_le_rank
#align le_rank_iff_exists_linear_independent le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent
theorem le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset
[Module.Free K V] {n : ℕ} : ↑n ≤ Module.rank K V ↔
∃ s : Finset V, s.card = n ∧ LinearIndependent K ((↑) : ↥(s : Set V) → V) := by
simp only [le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩, si⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl, si⟩
· rintro ⟨s, rfl, si⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩, si⟩
#align le_rank_iff_exists_linear_independent_finset le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset
/-- A vector space has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector of which all vectors are multiples. -/
theorem rank_le_one_iff [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ : V, ∀ v, ∃ r : K, r • v₀ = v := by
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
constructor
· intro hd
rw [← b.mk_eq_rank'', le_one_iff_subsingleton] at hd
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty κ with hb | ⟨⟨i⟩⟩
· use 0
have h' : ∀ v : V, v = 0 := by
simpa [range_eq_empty, Submodule.eq_bot_iff] using b.span_eq.symm
intro v
simp [h' v]
· use b i
have h' : (K ∙ b i) = ⊤ :=
(subsingleton_range b).eq_singleton_of_mem (mem_range_self i) ▸ b.span_eq
intro v
have hv : v ∈ (⊤ : Submodule K V) := mem_top
rwa [← h', mem_span_singleton] at hv
· rintro ⟨v₀, hv₀⟩
have h : (K ∙ v₀) = ⊤ := by
ext
simp [mem_span_singleton, hv₀]
rw [← rank_top, ← h]
refine (rank_span_le _).trans_eq ?_
simp
#align rank_le_one_iff rank_le_one_iff
/-- A vector space has dimension `1` if and only if there is a
single non-zero vector of which all vectors are multiples. -/
theorem rank_eq_one_iff [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V = 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ : V, v₀ ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ v, ∃ r : K, r • v₀ = v := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨v₀, h, hv⟩ ↦ (rank_le_one_iff.2 ⟨v₀, hv⟩).antisymm ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨v₀, hv⟩ := rank_le_one_iff.1 h.le
refine ⟨v₀, fun hzero ↦ ?_, hv⟩
simp_rw [hzero, smul_zero, exists_const] at hv
haveI : Subsingleton V := .intro fun _ _ ↦ by simp_rw [← hv]
exact one_ne_zero (h ▸ rank_subsingleton' K V)
· by_contra H
rw [not_le, lt_one_iff_zero] at H
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (H ▸ b.mk_eq_rank'')
haveI := b.repr.toEquiv.subsingleton
exact h (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- A submodule has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector in the submodule such that the submodule is contained in
its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_le_one_iff (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ ∈ s, s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
simp_rw [rank_le_one_iff, le_span_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩, h⟩
use v₀, hv₀
intro v hv
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h ⟨v, hv⟩
use r
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul] at hr
· rintro ⟨v₀, hv₀, h⟩
use ⟨v₀, hv₀⟩
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h v hv
use r
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul]
#align rank_submodule_le_one_iff rank_submodule_le_one_iff
/-- A submodule has dimension `1` if and only if there is a
single non-zero vector in the submodule such that the submodule is contained in
its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_eq_one_iff (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s = 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ ∈ s, v₀ ≠ 0 ∧ s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
simp_rw [rank_eq_one_iff, le_span_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩, H, h⟩ ↦ ⟨v₀, hv₀, fun h' ↦ by simp [h'] at H, fun v hv ↦ ?_⟩,
fun ⟨v₀, hv₀, H, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩, fun h' ↦ H (by simpa using h'), fun ⟨v, hv⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h ⟨v, hv⟩
exact ⟨r, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul] at hr⟩
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h v hv
exact ⟨r, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul]⟩
/-- A submodule has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector, not necessarily in the submodule, such that the
submodule is contained in its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_le_one_iff' (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀, s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
constructor
· rw [rank_submodule_le_one_iff]
rintro ⟨v₀, _, h⟩
exact ⟨v₀, h⟩
· rintro ⟨v₀, h⟩
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := s)
simpa [b.mk_eq_rank''] using b.linearIndependent.map' _ (ker_inclusion _ _ h)
|>.cardinal_le_rank.trans (rank_span_le {v₀})
#align rank_submodule_le_one_iff' rank_submodule_le_one_iff'
theorem Submodule.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal (W : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K W] :
Module.rank K W ≤ 1 ↔ W.IsPrincipal := by
simp only [rank_le_one_iff, Submodule.isPrincipal_iff, le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_iff,
span_singleton_le_iff_mem]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, hm'⟩
choose f hf using hm'
exact ⟨m, ⟨fun v hv => ⟨f ⟨v, hv⟩, congr_arg ((↑) : W → V) (hf ⟨v, hv⟩)⟩, hm⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
choose f hf using h
exact ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, fun v => ⟨f v.1 v.2, Subtype.ext (hf v.1 v.2)⟩⟩
#align submodule.rank_le_one_iff_is_principal Submodule.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal
theorem Module.rank_le_one_iff_top_isPrincipal [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V ≤ 1 ↔ (⊤ : Submodule K V).IsPrincipal := by
haveI := Module.Free.of_equiv (topEquiv (R := K) (M := V)).symm
rw [← Submodule.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal, rank_top]
#align module.rank_le_one_iff_top_is_principal Module.rank_le_one_iff_top_isPrincipal
/-- A module has dimension 1 iff there is some `v : V` so `{v}` is a basis.
-/
theorem finrank_eq_one_iff [Module.Free K V] (ι : Type*) [Unique ι] :
finrank K V = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Basis ι K V) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨basisUnique ι h⟩
· rintro ⟨b⟩
simpa using finrank_eq_card_basis b
#align finrank_eq_one_iff finrank_eq_one_iff
/-- A module has dimension 1 iff there is some nonzero `v : V` so every vector is a multiple of `v`.
-/
theorem finrank_eq_one_iff' [Module.Free K V] :
finrank K V = 1 ↔ ∃ v ≠ 0, ∀ w : V, ∃ c : K, c • v = w := by
rw [← rank_eq_one_iff]
exact toNat_eq_iff one_ne_zero
#align finrank_eq_one_iff' finrank_eq_one_iff'
/-- A finite dimensional module has dimension at most 1 iff
there is some `v : V` so every vector is a multiple of `v`.
-/
theorem finrank_le_one_iff [Module.Free K V] [Module.Finite K V] :
finrank K V ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v : V, ∀ w : V, ∃ c : K, c • v = w := by
rw [← rank_le_one_iff, ← finrank_eq_rank, ← natCast_le, Nat.cast_one]
#align finrank_le_one_iff finrank_le_one_iff
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/FreeAndStrongRankCondition.lean | 217 | 220 | theorem Submodule.finrank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal
(W : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K W] [Module.Finite K W] :
finrank K W ≤ 1 ↔ W.IsPrincipal := by |
rw [← W.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal, ← finrank_eq_rank, ← natCast_le, Nat.cast_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (abs x * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem abs_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : abs z = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = abs z * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z := abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
#align complex.abs_eq_one_iff Complex.abs_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.range_exp_mul_I Complex.range_exp_mul_I
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, map_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
#align complex.arg_zero Complex.arg_zero
theorem ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : abs x = abs y) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
#align complex.ext_abs_arg Complex.ext_abs_arg
theorem ext_abs_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ abs x = abs y ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_abs_arg⟩
#align complex.ext_abs_arg_iff Complex.ext_abs_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (abs.pos hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
#align complex.arg_mem_Ioc Complex.arg_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
#align complex.range_arg Complex.range_arg
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
#align complex.arg_le_pi Complex.arg_le_pi
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_arg Complex.neg_pi_lt_arg
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi Complex.abs_arg_le_pi
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff (abs.pos h₀), zero_mul]
#align complex.arg_nonneg_iff Complex.arg_nonneg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
#align complex.arg_neg_iff Complex.arg_neg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (abs.pos hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
#align complex.arg_real_mul Complex.arg_real_mul
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_abs_arg_iff, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_ofReal, abs_abs,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (abs.ne_zero hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (abs.pos hy) (abs.pos hx)
#align complex.arg_eq_arg_iff Complex.arg_eq_arg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
#align complex.arg_one Complex.arg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
#align complex.arg_neg_one Complex.arg_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_I Complex.arg_I
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_neg_I Complex.arg_neg_I
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (abs.ne_zero h)]
#align complex.tan_arg Complex.tan_arg
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_nonneg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [abs.nonneg]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
#align complex.arg_eq_zero_iff Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
#align complex.arg_lt_pi_iff Complex.arg_lt_pi_iff
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_neg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
#align complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
if_pos hx
#align complex.arg_of_re_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
#align complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero Complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
#align complex.arg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
#align complex.arg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, abs_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
#align complex.arg_conj Complex.arg_conj
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
#align complex.arg_inv Complex.arg_inv
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma abs_eq_one_iff' : abs x = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [abs_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using abs_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
_root_.abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
#align complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
#align complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff Complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff]
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
#align complex.arg_conj_coe_angle Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
#align complex.arg_inv_coe_angle Complex.arg_inv_coe_angle
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_coe_angle {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : (arg (-x) : Real.Angle) = arg x + π := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg hi, Real.Angle.coe_add]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le, ←
Real.Angle.coe_add, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· exact False.elim (hx (ext hr hi))
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr),
Real.Angle.coe_zero, zero_add]
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos hi, Real.Angle.coe_sub, Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi]
#align complex.arg_neg_coe_angle Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
have hi : toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ θ
ring
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I hr hi using 3
simp [toIocMod, cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi, sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod hr, toIocMod_sub_self, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor,
zsmul_eq_mul]
ring_nf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (r * (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I)) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
induction' θ using Real.Angle.induction_on with θ
rw [Real.Angle.cos_coe, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋
exact mod_cast arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub hr θ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
theorem arg_mul_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x * y) : Real.Angle) = arg x + arg y := by
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (mul_pos (abs.pos hx) (abs.pos hy))
(arg x + arg y : Real.Angle) using
3
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.coe_add, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.cos_coe, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin,
cos_add_sin_I, ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add, ofReal_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (exp _), ← mul_assoc (abs y : ℂ), abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I, mul_comm y, ←
mul_assoc, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
#align complex.arg_mul_coe_angle Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle
theorem arg_div_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x / y) : Real.Angle) = arg x - arg y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, arg_mul_coe_angle hx (inv_ne_zero hy), arg_inv_coe_angle, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_div_coe_angle Complex.arg_div_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg (z : ℂ) : (arg z : Real.Angle).toReal = arg z := by
rw [Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
exact arg_mem_Ioc _
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_to_real_eq_arg Complex.arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal {z : ℂ} {θ : Real.Angle} :
(arg z : Real.Angle) = θ ↔ arg z = θ.toReal := by
rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_to_real Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff {x y : ℂ} : (arg x : Real.Angle) = arg y ↔ arg x = arg y := by
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff
lemma arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
(x * y).arg = x.arg + y.arg ↔ arg x + arg y ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [← arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg, arg_mul_coe_angle hx₀ hy₀, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
alias ⟨_, arg_mul⟩ := arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff
section slitPlane
open ComplexOrder in
/-- An alternative description of the slit plane as consisting of nonzero complex numbers
whose argument is not π. -/
lemma mem_slitPlane_iff_arg {z : ℂ} : z ∈ slitPlane ↔ z.arg ≠ π ∧ z ≠ 0 := by
simp only [mem_slitPlane_iff_not_le_zero, le_iff_lt_or_eq, ne_eq, arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero, not_or]
lemma slitPlane_arg_ne_pi {z : ℂ} (hz : z ∈ slitPlane) : z.arg ≠ Real.pi :=
(mem_slitPlane_iff_arg.mp hz).1
end slitPlane
section Continuity
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos (hx : 0 < x.re) : arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
((continuous_re.tendsto _).eventually (lt_mem_nhds hx)).mono fun _ hy => arg_of_re_nonneg hy.le
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 < x.im) :
arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
suffices h_forall_nhds : ∀ᶠ y : ℂ in 𝓝 x, y.re < 0 ∧ 0 < y.im from
h_forall_nhds.mono fun y hy => arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hy.1 hy.2.le
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ (⟨hx_re, hx_im⟩ : x.re < 0 ∧ 0 < x.im)
exact
IsOpen.and (isOpen_lt continuous_re continuous_zero) (isOpen_lt continuous_zero continuous_im)
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 608 | 614 | theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_neg (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by |
suffices h_forall_nhds : ∀ᶠ y : ℂ in 𝓝 x, y.re < 0 ∧ y.im < 0 from
h_forall_nhds.mono fun y hy => arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hy.1 hy.2
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ (⟨hx_re, hx_im⟩ : x.re < 0 ∧ x.im < 0)
exact
IsOpen.and (isOpen_lt continuous_re continuous_zero) (isOpen_lt continuous_im continuous_zero)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Support
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.Jacobian
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
#align_import measure_theory.integral.integral_eq_improper from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b84aee748341da06a6d78491367e2c0e9f15e8a5"
/-!
# Links between an integral and its "improper" version
In its current state, mathlib only knows how to talk about definite ("proper") integrals,
in the sense that it treats integrals over `[x, +∞)` the same as it treats integrals over
`[y, z]`. For example, the integral over `[1, +∞)` is **not** defined to be the limit of
the integral over `[1, x]` as `x` tends to `+∞`, which is known as an **improper integral**.
Indeed, the "proper" definition is stronger than the "improper" one. The usual counterexample
is `x ↦ sin(x)/x`, which has an improper integral over `[1, +∞)` but no definite integral.
Although definite integrals have better properties, they are hardly usable when it comes to
computing integrals on unbounded sets, which is much easier using limits. Thus, in this file,
we prove various ways of studying the proper integral by studying the improper one.
## Definitions
The main definition of this file is `MeasureTheory.AECover`. It is a rather technical definition
whose sole purpose is generalizing and factoring proofs. Given an index type `ι`, a countably
generated filter `l` over `ι`, and an `ι`-indexed family `φ` of subsets of a measurable space `α`
equipped with a measure `μ`, one should think of a hypothesis `hφ : MeasureTheory.AECover μ l φ` as
a sufficient condition for being able to interpret `∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x
in φ i, f x ∂μ` as `i` tends to `l`.
When using this definition with a measure restricted to a set `s`, which happens fairly often, one
should not try too hard to use a `MeasureTheory.AECover` of subsets of `s`, as it often makes proofs
more complicated than necessary. See for example the proof of
`MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto` where we use `(fun x ↦ oi x)` as a
`MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. `μ.restrict (Iic b)`, instead of using `(fun x ↦ Ioc x b)`.
## Main statements
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is a measurable
`ENNReal`-valued function, then `∫⁻ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, if `f` is measurable and
integrable on each `φ n`, and if `∫ x in φ n, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` tends to some `I : ℝ` as n tends to `l`,
then `f` is integrable
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is measurable
and integrable (globally), then `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `+∞`.
We then specialize these lemmas to various use cases involving intervals, which are frequent
in analysis. In particular,
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` is a version of FTC-2 on the interval
`(a, +∞)`, giving the formula `∫ x in (a, +∞), g' x = l - g a` if `g'` is integrable and
`g` tends to `l` at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg` gives the same result assuming that
`g'` is nonnegative instead of integrable. Its automatic integrability in this context is proved
in `MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi` is a version of the change of variables formula
on semi-infinite intervals.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that a function whose
derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` has a limit at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that an integrable function
whose derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` tends to `0` at `+∞`.
Versions of these results are also given on the intervals `(-∞, a]` and `(-∞, +∞)`, as well as
the corresponding versions of integration by parts.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Set TopologicalSpace
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
section AECover
variable {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α) (l : Filter ι)
/-- A sequence `φ` of subsets of `α` is a `MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. a measure `μ` and a filter
`l` if almost every point (w.r.t. `μ`) of `α` eventually belongs to `φ n` (w.r.t. `l`), and if
each `φ n` is measurable. This definition is a technical way to avoid duplicating a lot of
proofs. It should be thought of as a sufficient condition for being able to interpret
`∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`.
See for example `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`,
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` and
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`. -/
structure AECover (φ : ι → Set α) : Prop where
ae_eventually_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ i in l, x ∈ φ i
protected measurableSet : ∀ i, MeasurableSet <| φ i
#align measure_theory.ae_cover MeasureTheory.AECover
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.ae_eventually_mem MeasureTheory.AECover.ae_eventually_mem
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.measurable MeasureTheory.AECover.measurableSet
variable {μ} {l}
namespace AECover
/-!
## Operations on `AECover`s
Porting note: this is a new section.
-/
/-- Elementwise intersection of two `AECover`s is an `AECover`. -/
theorem inter {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hψ : AECover μ l ψ) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ φ i ∩ ψ i) where
ae_eventually_mem := hψ.1.mp <| hφ.1.mono fun _ ↦ Eventually.and
measurableSet _ := (hφ.2 _).inter (hψ.2 _)
theorem superset {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hsub : ∀ i, φ i ⊆ ψ i)
(hmeas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (ψ i)) : AECover μ l ψ :=
⟨hφ.1.mono fun _x hx ↦ hx.mono fun i hi ↦ hsub i hi, hmeas⟩
theorem mono_ac {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≪ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := ⟨hle hφ.1, hφ.2⟩
theorem mono {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≤ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := hφ.mono_ac hle.absolutelyContinuous
end AECover
section MetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
theorem aecover_ball {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.ball x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
theorem aecover_closedBall {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.closedBall x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isClosed_ball.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ici_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
end MetricSpace
section Preorderα
variable [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α} (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
theorem aecover_Ici : AECover μ l fun i => Ici (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := ae_of_all μ ha.eventually_le_atBot
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ici
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ici MeasureTheory.aecover_Ici
theorem aecover_Iic : AECover μ l fun i => Iic <| b i := aecover_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Iic MeasureTheory.aecover_Iic
theorem aecover_Icc : AECover μ l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ici ha).inter (aecover_Iic hb)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Icc MeasureTheory.aecover_Icc
end Preorderα
section LinearOrderα
variable [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α} (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
theorem aecover_Ioi [NoMinOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioi (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := ae_of_all μ ha.eventually_lt_atBot
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ioi
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioi MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioi
theorem aecover_Iio [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Iio (b i) := aecover_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Iio MeasureTheory.aecover_Iio
theorem aecover_Ioo [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioi ha).inter (aecover_Iio hb)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioo MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioo
theorem aecover_Ioc [NoMinOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioi ha).inter (aecover_Iic hb)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioc MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioc
theorem aecover_Ico [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ici ha).inter (aecover_Iio hb)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ico MeasureTheory.aecover_Ico
end LinearOrderα
section FiniteIntervals
variable [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α} {A B : α} (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B))
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi : AECover (μ.restrict (Ioi A)) l fun i ↦ Ioi (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := (ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioi).mono fun _x hx ↦ ha.eventually <|
eventually_lt_nhds hx
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ioi
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem aecover_Iio_of_Iio : AECover (μ.restrict (Iio B)) l fun i ↦ Iio (b i) :=
aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem aecover_Ioi_of_Ici : AECover (μ.restrict (Ioi A)) l fun i ↦ Ici (a i) :=
(aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi ha).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ici
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem aecover_Iio_of_Iic : AECover (μ.restrict (Iio B)) l fun i ↦ Iic (b i) :=
aecover_Ioi_of_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
((aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi ha).mono <| Measure.restrict_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self le_rfl).inter
((aecover_Iio_of_Iio hb).mono <| Measure.restrict_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioo_of_Ioo MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Icc : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Icc_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Icc
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioo_of_Icc MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioo_of_Icc
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ico : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Ico_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ico
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioo_of_Ico MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioo_of_Ico
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Ioc_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ioc
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioo_of_Ioc MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc
variable [NoAtoms μ]
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioc_of_Icc MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioc_of_Icc
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioc_of_Ico MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioc_of_Ico
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioc_of_Ioc MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioc_of_Ioc
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ioc_of_Ioo MeasureTheory.aecover_Ioc_of_Ioo
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ico_of_Icc MeasureTheory.aecover_Ico_of_Icc
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ico_of_Ico MeasureTheory.aecover_Ico_of_Ico
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ico_of_Ioc MeasureTheory.aecover_Ico_of_Ioc
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Ico_of_Ioo MeasureTheory.aecover_Ico_of_Ioo
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Icc_of_Icc MeasureTheory.aecover_Icc_of_Icc
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Icc_of_Ico MeasureTheory.aecover_Icc_of_Ico
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Icc_of_Ioc MeasureTheory.aecover_Icc_of_Ioc
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_Icc_of_Ioo MeasureTheory.aecover_Icc_of_Ioo
end FiniteIntervals
protected theorem AECover.restrict {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {s : Set α} :
AECover (μ.restrict s) l φ :=
hφ.mono Measure.restrict_le_self
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.restrict MeasureTheory.AECover.restrict
theorem aecover_restrict_of_ae_imp {s : Set α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ae_eventually_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ n in l, x ∈ φ n)
(measurable : ∀ n, MeasurableSet <| φ n) : AECover (μ.restrict s) l φ where
ae_eventually_mem := by rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
measurableSet := measurable
#align measure_theory.ae_cover_restrict_of_ae_imp MeasureTheory.aecover_restrict_of_ae_imp
theorem AECover.inter_restrict {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : AECover (μ.restrict s) l fun i => φ i ∩ s :=
aecover_restrict_of_ae_imp hs
(hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.mono fun _i hi => ⟨hi, hxs⟩) fun i =>
(hφ.measurableSet i).inter hs
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.inter_restrict MeasureTheory.AECover.inter_restrict
theorem AECover.ae_tendsto_indicator {β : Type*} [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => (φ i).indicator f x) l (𝓝 <| f x) :=
hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx =>
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' <| hx.mono fun _n hn => (indicator_of_mem hn _).symm
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.ae_tendsto_indicator MeasureTheory.AECover.ae_tendsto_indicator
theorem AECover.aemeasurable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] [l.NeBot]
{f : α → β} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ)
(hfm : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict <| φ i)) : AEMeasurable f μ := by
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := l.exists_seq_tendsto
have := aemeasurable_iUnion_iff.mpr fun n : ℕ => hfm (u n)
rwa [Measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem] at this
filter_upwards [hφ.ae_eventually_mem] with x hx using
mem_iUnion.mpr (hu.eventually hx).exists
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.AECover.aemeasurable
theorem AECover.aestronglyMeasurable {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] [l.NeBot] {f : α → β} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ)
(hfm : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict <| φ i)) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := l.exists_seq_tendsto
have := aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff.mpr fun n : ℕ => hfm (u n)
rwa [Measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem] at this
filter_upwards [hφ.ae_eventually_mem] with x hx using mem_iUnion.mpr (hu.eventually hx).exists
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AECover.aestronglyMeasurable
end AECover
theorem AECover.comp_tendsto {α ι ι' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι}
{l' : Filter ι'} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {u : ι' → ι} (hu : Tendsto u l' l) :
AECover μ l' (φ ∘ u) where
ae_eventually_mem := hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx => hu.eventually hx
measurableSet i := hφ.measurableSet (u i)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.comp_tendsto MeasureTheory.AECover.comp_tendsto
section AECoverUnionInterCountable
variable {α ι : Type*} [Countable ι] [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
theorem AECover.biUnion_Iic_aecover [Preorder ι] {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) :
AECover μ atTop fun n : ι => ⋃ (k) (_h : k ∈ Iic n), φ k :=
hφ.superset (fun _ ↦ subset_biUnion_of_mem right_mem_Iic) fun _ ↦ .biUnion (to_countable _)
fun _ _ ↦ (hφ.2 _)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.bUnion_Iic_ae_cover MeasureTheory.AECover.biUnion_Iic_aecover
-- Porting note: generalized from `[SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι]` to `[Preorder ι]`
theorem AECover.biInter_Ici_aecover [Preorder ι] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) : AECover μ atTop fun n : ι => ⋂ (k) (_h : k ∈ Ici n), φ k where
ae_eventually_mem := hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun x h ↦ by
simpa only [mem_iInter, mem_Ici, eventually_forall_ge_atTop]
measurableSet i := .biInter (to_countable _) fun n _ => hφ.measurableSet n
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.bInter_Ici_ae_cover MeasureTheory.AECover.biInter_Ici_aecover
end AECoverUnionInterCountable
section Lintegral
variable {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι}
private theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat {φ : ℕ → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ)
(hmono : Monotone φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) :=
let F n := (φ n).indicator f
have key₁ : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ := fun n => hfm.indicator (hφ.measurableSet n)
have key₂ : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Monotone fun n => F n x := ae_of_all _ fun x _i _j hij =>
indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (hmono hij) (fun x => zero_le <| f x) x
have key₃ : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hφ.ae_tendsto_indicator f
(lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone key₁ key₂ key₃).congr fun n =>
lintegral_indicator f (hφ.measurableSet n)
theorem AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_nat {φ : ℕ → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) : Tendsto (∫⁻ x in φ ·, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) := by
have lim₁ := lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat hφ.biInter_Ici_aecover
(fun i j hij => biInter_subset_biInter_left (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr hij)) hfm
have lim₂ := lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat hφ.biUnion_Iic_aecover
(fun i j hij => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left (Iic_subset_Iic.mpr hij)) hfm
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le lim₁ lim₂ (fun n ↦ ?_) fun n ↦ ?_
exacts [lintegral_mono_set (biInter_subset_of_mem left_mem_Ici),
lintegral_mono_set (subset_biUnion_of_mem right_mem_Iic)]
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.lintegral_tendsto_of_nat MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_nat
theorem AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) :=
tendsto_of_seq_tendsto fun _u hu => (hφ.comp_tendsto hu).lintegral_tendsto_of_nat hfm
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated
theorem AECover.lintegral_eq_of_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (I : ℝ≥0∞) (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm) htendsto
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.lintegral_eq_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_eq_of_tendsto
theorem AECover.iSup_lintegral_eq_of_countably_generated [Nonempty ι] [l.NeBot]
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) : ⨆ i : ι, ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
have := hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm
refine ciSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
(fun i => lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl) fun w hw => ?_
rcases exists_between hw with ⟨m, hm₁, hm₂⟩
rcases (eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt hm₂ this).exists with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le hm₁ hi⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.supr_lintegral_eq_of_countably_generated MeasureTheory.AECover.iSup_lintegral_eq_of_countably_generated
end Lintegral
section Integrable
variable {α ι E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal I) : Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨hfm, (le_of_tendsto ?_ hbounded).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top⟩
exact hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm.ennnorm
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ENNReal.ofReal I)) :
Integrable f μ := by
refine hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded (max 1 (I + 1)) hfm ?_
refine htendsto.eventually (ge_mem_nhds ?_)
refine (ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (lt_max_of_lt_left zero_lt_one)).2 ?_
exact lt_max_of_lt_right (lt_add_one I)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded' [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ≥0) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded I hfm
(by simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] using hbounded)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded' MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto' [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ≥0) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto I hfm
(by simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] using htendsto)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto' MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ := by
have hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hφ.aestronglyMeasurable fun i => (hfi i).aestronglyMeasurable
refine hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded I hfm ?_
conv at hbounded in integral _ _ =>
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (ae_of_all _ fun x => @norm_nonneg E _ (f x))
hfm.norm.restrict]
conv at hbounded in ENNReal.ofReal _ =>
rw [← coe_nnnorm]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
refine hbounded.mono fun i hi => ?_
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (ne_top_of_lt (hfi i).2)]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hi
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := htendsto.isBoundedUnder_le
hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I' hfi hI'
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hnng : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, 0 ≤ f x) (hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi <| hbounded.mono fun _i hi =>
(integral_congr_ae <| ae_restrict_of_ae <| hnng.mono fun _ => Real.norm_of_nonneg).le.trans hi
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hnng : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, 0 ≤ f x) (htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := htendsto.isBoundedUnder_le
hφ.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae I' hfi hnng hI'
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae
end Integrable
section Integral
variable {α ι E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
theorem AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
suffices h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x : α, (φ i).indicator f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x : α, f x ∂μ)) from by
convert h using 2; rw [integral_indicator (hφ.measurableSet _)]
tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun x => ‖f x‖)
(eventually_of_forall fun i => hfi.aestronglyMeasurable.indicator <| hφ.measurableSet i)
(eventually_of_forall fun i => ae_of_all _ fun x => norm_indicator_le_norm_self _ _) hfi.norm
(hφ.ae_tendsto_indicator f)
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated
/-- Slight reformulation of
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`. -/
theorem AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : E) (hfi : Integrable f μ)
(h : Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi) h
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integral_eq_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto
theorem AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hnng : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfi : ∀ n, IntegrableOn f (φ n) μ) (htendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
have hfi' : Integrable f μ := hφ.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae I hfi hnng htendsto
hφ.integral_eq_of_tendsto I hfi' htendsto
#align measure_theory.ae_cover.integral_eq_of_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae
end Integral
section IntegrableOfIntervalIntegral
variable {ι E : Type*} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot l] [IsCountablyGenerated l]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {a b : ι → ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
theorem integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) (b i)) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) (h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a i..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ := by
have hφ : AECover μ l _ := aecover_Ioc ha hb
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot 0),
hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 0)] with i hai hbi ht
rwa [← intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (hai.trans hbi)]
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded MeasureTheory.integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc (a i) (b i)`,
where `a i` tends to -∞ and `b i` tends to ∞, and
`∫ x in a i .. b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (-∞, ∞) -/
theorem integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) (b i)) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) (h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' hfi ha hb hI'
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_interval_integral_norm_tendsto MeasureTheory.integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto
theorem integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I b : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) b) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a i..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ := by
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Iic b) l _ := aecover_Ioi ha
have hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioi (a i)) (μ.restrict <| Iic b) := by
intro i
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
exact hfi i
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot b)] with i hai
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hai, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
exact id
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Iic_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc (a i) b`,
where `a i` tends to -∞, and
`∫ x in a i .. b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (-∞, b) -/
theorem integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I b : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) b) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' b hfi ha hI'
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Iic_of_interval_integral_norm_tendsto MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I a : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc a (b i)) μ) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ := by
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) l _ := aecover_Iic hb
have hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Iic (b i)) (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) := by
intro i
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i), inter_comm]
exact hfi i
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop a)] with i hbi
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hbi, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i),
inter_comm]
exact id
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioi_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc a (b i)`,
where `b i` tends to ∞, and
`∫ x in a .. b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (a, ∞) -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I a : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc a (b i)) μ) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
(h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| I)) : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' a hfi hb hI'
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioi_of_interval_integral_norm_tendsto MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded {I a₀ b₀ : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc (a i) (b i)) (ha : Tendsto a l <| 𝓝 a₀)
(hb : Tendsto b l <| 𝓝 b₀) (h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc (a i) (b i), ‖f x‖) ≤ I) :
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a₀ b₀) := by
refine (aecover_Ioc_of_Ioc ha hb).integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I
(fun i => (hfi i).restrict measurableSet_Ioc) (h.mono fun i hi ↦ ?_)
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict measurableSet_Ioc]
refine le_trans (setIntegral_mono_set (hfi i).norm ?_ ?_) hi <;> apply ae_of_all
· simp only [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, forall_const]
· intro c hc; exact hc.1
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioc_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_left {I a₀ b : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc (a i) b) (ha : Tendsto a l <| 𝓝 a₀)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc (a i) b, ‖f x‖) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a₀ b) :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded hfi ha tendsto_const_nhds h
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioc_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded_left MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_left
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_right {I a b₀ : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc a (b i)) (hb : Tendsto b l <| 𝓝 b₀)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc a (b i), ‖f x‖) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b₀) :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded hfi tendsto_const_nhds hb h
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioc_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded_right MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")]
alias integrableOn_Ioc_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")]
alias integrableOn_Ioc_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded_left :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")]
alias integrableOn_Ioc_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded_right :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_right
end IntegrableOfIntervalIntegral
section IntegralOfIntervalIntegral
variable {ι E : Type*} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l : Filter ι} [IsCountablyGenerated l]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {a b : ι → ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral (hfi : Integrable f μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Ioc (a i) (b i)
have hφ : AECover μ l φ := aecover_Ioc ha hb
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot 0),
hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 0)] with i hai hbi
exact (intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (hai.trans hbi)).symm
#align measure_theory.interval_integral_tendsto_integral MeasureTheory.intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic (b : ℝ) (hfi : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ)
(ha : Tendsto a l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x in Iic b, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Ioi (a i)
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Iic b) l φ := aecover_Ioi ha
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot <| b)] with i hai
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hai, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
rfl
#align measure_theory.interval_integral_tendsto_integral_Iic MeasureTheory.intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi (a : ℝ) (hfi : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a..b i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x in Ioi a, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Iic (b i)
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) l φ := aecover_Iic hb
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop <| a)] with i hbi
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hbi, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i),
inter_comm]
rfl
#align measure_theory.interval_integral_tendsto_integral_Ioi MeasureTheory.intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi
end IntegralOfIntervalIntegral
open Real
open scoped Interval
section IoiFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {g g' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b l : ℝ} {m : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- If the derivative of a function defined on the real line is integrable close to `+∞`, then
the function has a limit at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop f)) := by
suffices ∃ a, Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) from tendsto_nhds_limUnder this
suffices CauchySeq f from cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete this
apply Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.2 (fun ε εpos ↦ ?_)
have A : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ici ↑n, ‖f' x‖ < ε := by
have L : Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ∫ x in Ici (n : ℝ), ‖f' x‖) atTop
(𝓝 (∫ x in ⋂ (n : ℕ), Ici (n : ℝ), ‖f' x‖)) := by
apply tendsto_setIntegral_of_antitone (fun n ↦ measurableSet_Ici)
· intro m n hmn
exact Ici_subset_Ici.2 (Nat.cast_le.mpr hmn)
· rcases exists_nat_gt a with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, IntegrableOn.mono_set f'int.norm (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hn)⟩
have B : ⋂ (n : ℕ), Ici (n : ℝ) = ∅ := by
apply eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x ↦ ?_)
simpa only [mem_iInter, mem_Ici, not_forall, not_le] using exists_nat_gt x
simp only [B, Measure.restrict_empty, integral_zero_measure] at L
exact (tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ εpos
have B : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, a < n := by
rcases exists_nat_gt a with ⟨n, hn⟩
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop n] with m (hm : n < m) using hn.trans (Nat.cast_lt.mpr hm)
rcases (A.and B).exists with ⟨N, hN, h'N⟩
refine ⟨N, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
calc
dist (f x) (f ↑N)
= ‖f x - f N‖ := dist_eq_norm _ _
_ = ‖∫ t in Ioc ↑N x, f' t‖ := by
rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hx, intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt]
· intro y hy
simp only [hx, uIcc_of_le, mem_Icc] at hy
exact hderiv _ (h'N.trans_le hy.1)
· rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hx]
exact f'int.mono_set (Ioc_subset_Ioi_self.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h'N.le))
_ ≤ ∫ t in Ioc ↑N x, ‖f' t‖ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm fun a ↦ f' a
_ ≤ ∫ t in Ici ↑N, ‖f' t‖ := by
apply setIntegral_mono_set
· apply IntegrableOn.mono_set f'int.norm (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 h'N)
· filter_upwards with x using norm_nonneg _
· have : Ioc (↑N) x ⊆ Ici ↑N := Ioc_subset_Ioi_self.trans Ioi_subset_Ici_self
exact this.eventuallyLE
_ < ε := hN
open UniformSpace in
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on `(a, +∞)`, then the function tends to zero
at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) (fint : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a)) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
let F : E →L[ℝ] Completion E := Completion.toComplL
have Fderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt (F ∘ f) (F (f' x)) x :=
fun x hx ↦ F.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt _ (hderiv x hx)
have Fint : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f) (Ioi a) := by apply F.integrable_comp fint
have F'int : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f') (Ioi a) := by apply F.integrable_comp f'int
have A : Tendsto (F ∘ f) atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop (F ∘ f))) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi Fderiv F'int
have B : limUnder atTop (F ∘ f) = F 0 := by
have : IntegrableAtFilter (F ∘ f) atTop := by exact ⟨Ioi a, Ioi_mem_atTop _, Fint⟩
apply IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto this ?_ A
intro s hs
rcases mem_atTop_sets.1 hs with ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [← top_le_iff, ← volume_Ici (a := b)]
exact measure_mono hb
rwa [B, ← Embedding.tendsto_nhds_iff] at A
exact (Completion.uniformEmbedding_coe E).embedding
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(a, +∞)`.
When a function has a limit at infinity `m`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `m - f a`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a))
(hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, f' x = m - f a := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn f (Ici a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi a f'int tendsto_id) ?_
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hf.sub_const _)
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop a] with x hx
have h'x : a ≤ id x := le_of_lt hx
symm
apply
intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le h'x (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le h'x]
exact f'int.mono (fun y hy => hy.1) le_rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_Ioi_of_has_deriv_at_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(a, +∞)`.
When a function has a limit at infinity `m`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `m - f a`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 m)) :
∫ x in Ioi a, f' x = m - f a := by
refine integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le)
f'int hf
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align measure_theory.integral_Ioi_of_has_deriv_at_of_tendsto' MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto'
/-- A special case of `integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` where we assume that `f` is C^1 with
compact support. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.integral_Ioi_deriv_eq (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f)
(h2f : HasCompactSupport f) (b : ℝ) : ∫ x in Ioi b, deriv f x = - f b := by
have := fun x (_ : x ∈ Ioi b) ↦ hf.differentiable le_rfl x |>.hasDerivAt
rw [integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hf.continuous.continuousWithinAt this, zero_sub]
· refine hf.continuous_deriv le_rfl |>.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h2f.deriv |>.integrableOn
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq, Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact] at h2f
exact h2f.filter_mono _root_.atTop_le_cocompact |>.tendsto
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn g (Ici a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (l - g a) a (fun x => ?_) tendsto_id ?_
· exact intervalIntegral.integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
(fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1) fun y hy => g'pos y hy.1
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hg.sub_const _)
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop a] with x hx
have h'x : a ≤ id x := le_of_lt hx
calc
g x - g a = ∫ y in a..id x, g' y := by
symm
apply intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le h'x
(hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self) fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le h'x]
exact intervalIntegral.integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
(fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1) fun y hy => g'pos y hy.1
_ = ∫ y in a..id x, ‖g' y‖ := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le h'x]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioc fun y hy => ?_
dsimp
rw [abs_of_nonneg]
exact g'pos _ hy.1
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
refine integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le) g'pos hg
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg'
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`). Version assuming differentiability on `(a, +∞)` and
continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hcont hderiv
(integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg hcont hderiv g'pos hg) hg
#align measure_theory.integral_Ioi_of_has_deriv_at_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg'`). Version assuming differentiability on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' hderiv (integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' hderiv g'pos hg)
hg
#align measure_theory.integral_Ioi_of_has_deriv_at_of_nonneg' MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg'
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
apply integrable_neg_iff.1
exact integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg hcont.neg (fun x hx => (hderiv x hx).neg)
(fun x hx => neg_nonneg_of_nonpos (g'neg x hx)) hg.neg
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
refine integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos ?_ (fun x hx ↦ hderiv x hx.out.le) g'neg hg
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos' MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos'
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`). Version assuming differentiability on `(a, +∞)` and
continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hcont hderiv
(integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos hcont hderiv g'neg hg) hg
#align measure_theory.integral_Ioi_of_has_deriv_at_of_nonpos MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg'`). Version assuming differentiability on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' hderiv (integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos' hderiv g'neg hg)
hg
#align measure_theory.integral_Ioi_of_has_deriv_at_of_nonpos' MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos'
end IoiFTC
section IicFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {g g' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b l : ℝ} {m : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- If the derivative of a function defined on the real line is integrable close to `-∞`, then
the function has a limit at `-∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a)) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atBot f)) := by
suffices ∃ a, Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 a) from tendsto_nhds_limUnder this
let g := f ∘ (fun x ↦ -x)
have hdg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi (-a), HasDerivAt g (-f' (-x)) x := by
intro x hx
have : -x ∈ Iic a := by simp only [mem_Iic, mem_Ioi, neg_le] at *; exact hx.le
simpa using HasDerivAt.scomp x (hderiv (-x) this) (hasDerivAt_neg' x)
have L : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop g)) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi hdg
exact ((MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_comp_preimage (Measure.measurePreserving_neg _)
(Homeomorph.neg ℝ).measurableEmbedding).2 f'int.neg).mono_set (by simp)
refine ⟨limUnder atTop g, ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x ↦ g (-x)) atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atTop g)) := L.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop
simpa [g] using this
open UniformSpace in
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on `(-∞, a]`, then the function tends to zero
at `-∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a)) (fint : IntegrableOn f (Iic a)) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0) := by
let F : E →L[ℝ] Completion E := Completion.toComplL
have Fderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt (F ∘ f) (F (f' x)) x :=
fun x hx ↦ F.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt _ (hderiv x hx)
have Fint : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f) (Iic a) := by apply F.integrable_comp fint
have F'int : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f') (Iic a) := by apply F.integrable_comp f'int
have A : Tendsto (F ∘ f) atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atBot (F ∘ f))) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic Fderiv F'int
have B : limUnder atBot (F ∘ f) = F 0 := by
have : IntegrableAtFilter (F ∘ f) atBot := by exact ⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot _, Fint⟩
apply IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto this ?_ A
intro s hs
rcases mem_atBot_sets.1 hs with ⟨b, hb⟩
apply le_antisymm (le_top)
rw [← volume_Iic (a := b)]
exact measure_mono hb
rwa [B, ← Embedding.tendsto_nhds_iff] at A
exact (Completion.uniformEmbedding_coe E).embedding
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(-∞, a)`.
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(-∞, a)` is `f a - m`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(-∞, a)` and continuity at `a⁻`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at minus infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic`. -/
theorem integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a))
(hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Iic a, f' x = f a - m := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn f (Iic a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic a f'int tendsto_id) ?_
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hf.const_sub _)
filter_upwards [Iic_mem_atBot a] with x hx
symm
apply intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hx
(hcont.mono Icc_subset_Iic_self) fun y hy => hderiv y hy.2
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hx]
exact f'int.mono (fun y hy => hy.2) le_rfl
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(-∞, a)`.
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(-∞, a)` is `f a - m`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(-∞, a]`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at minus infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic`. -/
theorem integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto'
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a))
(hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Iic a, f' x = f a - m := by
refine integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le)
f'int hf
exact (hderiv a right_mem_Iic).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- A special case of `integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` where we assume that `f` is C^1 with
compact support. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.integral_Iic_deriv_eq (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f)
(h2f : HasCompactSupport f) (b : ℝ) : ∫ x in Iic b, deriv f x = f b := by
have := fun x (_ : x ∈ Iio b) ↦ hf.differentiable le_rfl x |>.hasDerivAt
rw [integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hf.continuous.continuousWithinAt this, sub_zero]
· refine hf.continuous_deriv le_rfl |>.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h2f.deriv |>.integrableOn
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq, Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact] at h2f
exact h2f.filter_mono _root_.atBot_le_cocompact |>.tendsto
end IicFTC
section UnivFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {g g' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b l : ℝ} {m n : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on the whole real line
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞` and `n` at `+∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative is `n - m`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at `-∞` and `+∞`,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic` and
`tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (hf' : Integrable f')
(hbot : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) (htop : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 n)) : ∫ x, f' x = n - m := by
rw [← integral_univ, ← Set.Iic_union_Ioi (a := 0),
integral_union (Iic_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl) measurableSet_Ioi hf'.integrableOn hf'.integrableOn,
integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ ↦ hderiv x) hf'.integrableOn hbot,
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ ↦ hderiv x) hf'.integrableOn htop]
abel
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on the real line, then the integral of the
derivative is zero. -/
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrable
(hderiv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (hf' : Integrable f') (hf : Integrable f) :
∫ x, f' x = 0 := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE]
have A : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic (a := 0) (fun x _hx ↦ hderiv x)
hf'.integrableOn hf.integrableOn
have B : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi (a := 0) (fun x _hx ↦ hderiv x)
hf'.integrableOn hf.integrableOn
simpa using integral_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hderiv hf' A B
end UnivFTC
section IoiChangeVariables
open Real
open scoped Interval
variable {E : Type*} {f : ℝ → E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- Change-of-variables formula for `Ioi` integrals of vector-valued functions, proved by taking
limits from the result for finite intervals. -/
theorem integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → E} {a : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f <| Ici a) (hft : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ioi x) x)
(hg_cont : ContinuousOn g <| f '' Ioi a) (hg1 : IntegrableOn g <| f '' Ici a)
(hg2 : IntegrableOn (fun x => f' x • (g ∘ f) x) (Ici a)) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, f' x • (g ∘ f) x) = ∫ u in Ioi (f a), g u := by
have eq : ∀ b : ℝ, a < b → (∫ x in a..b, f' x • (g ∘ f) x) = ∫ u in f a..f b, g u := fun b hb ↦ by
have i1 : Ioo (min a b) (max a b) ⊆ Ioi a := by
rw [min_eq_left hb.le]
exact Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
have i2 : [[a, b]] ⊆ Ici a := by rw [uIcc_of_le hb.le]; exact Icc_subset_Ici_self
refine
intervalIntegral.integral_comp_smul_deriv''' (hf.mono i2)
(fun x hx => hff' x <| mem_of_mem_of_subset hx i1) (hg_cont.mono <| image_subset _ ?_)
(hg1.mono_set <| image_subset _ ?_) (hg2.mono_set i2)
· rw [min_eq_left hb.le]; exact Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
· rw [uIcc_of_le hb.le]; exact Icc_subset_Ici_self
rw [integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi] at hg2
have t2 := intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi _ hg2 tendsto_id
have : Ioi (f a) ⊆ f '' Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <|
IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici isPreconnected_Ici left_mem_Ici
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| Ici_mem_atTop _) hf hft
have t1 := (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi _ (hg1.mono_set this) tendsto_id).comp hft
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (Tendsto.congr' (eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop a) eq) t2) t1
#align measure_theory.integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi MeasureTheory.integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi
/-- Change-of-variables formula for `Ioi` integrals of scalar-valued functions -/
theorem integral_comp_mul_deriv_Ioi {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ} {a : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f <| Ici a) (hft : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ioi x) x)
(hg_cont : ContinuousOn g <| f '' Ioi a) (hg1 : IntegrableOn g <| f '' Ici a)
(hg2 : IntegrableOn (fun x => (g ∘ f) x * f' x) (Ici a)) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, (g ∘ f) x * f' x) = ∫ u in Ioi (f a), g u := by
have hg2' : IntegrableOn (fun x => f' x • (g ∘ f) x) (Ici a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hg2
simpa [mul_comm] using integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi hf hft hff' hg_cont hg1 hg2'
#align measure_theory.integral_comp_mul_deriv_Ioi MeasureTheory.integral_comp_mul_deriv_Ioi
/-- Substitution `y = x ^ p` in integrals over `Ioi 0` -/
theorem integral_comp_rpow_Ioi (g : ℝ → E) {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in Ioi 0, (|p| * x ^ (p - 1)) • g (x ^ p)) = ∫ y in Ioi 0, g y := by
let S := Ioi (0 : ℝ)
have a1 : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ S → HasDerivWithinAt (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) S x :=
fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_rpow_const (Or.inl (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne')).hasDerivWithinAt
have a2 : InjOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) S := by
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hp with (h | h)
· apply StrictAntiOn.injOn
intro x hx y hy hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv (rpow_pos_of_pos hx p) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy p), ← rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx),
← rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy)]
exact rpow_lt_rpow (le_of_lt hx) hxy (neg_pos.mpr h)
exact StrictMonoOn.injOn fun x hx y _ hxy => rpow_lt_rpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le hxy h
have a3 : (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) '' S = S := by
ext1 x; rw [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩; exact rpow_pos_of_pos hy p
· intro hx; refine ⟨x ^ (1 / p), rpow_pos_of_pos hx _, ?_⟩
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx), one_div_mul_cancel hp, rpow_one]
have := integral_image_eq_integral_abs_deriv_smul measurableSet_Ioi a1 a2 g
rw [a3] at this; rw [this]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt hx) _)]
#align measure_theory.integral_comp_rpow_Ioi MeasureTheory.integral_comp_rpow_Ioi
theorem integral_comp_rpow_Ioi_of_pos {g : ℝ → E} {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) :
(∫ x in Ioi 0, (p * x ^ (p - 1)) • g (x ^ p)) = ∫ y in Ioi 0, g y := by
convert integral_comp_rpow_Ioi g hp.ne'
rw [abs_of_nonneg hp.le]
#align measure_theory.integral_comp_rpow_Ioi_of_pos MeasureTheory.integral_comp_rpow_Ioi_of_pos
theorem integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (g : ℝ → E) (a : ℝ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, g (b * x)) = b⁻¹ • ∫ x in Ioi (b * a), g x := by
have : ∀ c : ℝ, MeasurableSet (Ioi c) := fun c => measurableSet_Ioi
rw [← integral_indicator (this a), ← integral_indicator (this (b * a)),
← abs_of_pos (inv_pos.mpr hb), ← Measure.integral_comp_mul_left]
congr
ext1 x
rw [← indicator_comp_right, preimage_const_mul_Ioi _ hb, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hb.ne']
rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi MeasureTheory.integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi
theorem integral_comp_mul_right_Ioi (g : ℝ → E) (a : ℝ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, g (x * b)) = b⁻¹ • ∫ x in Ioi (a * b), g x := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi g a hb
#align measure_theory.integral_comp_mul_right_Ioi MeasureTheory.integral_comp_mul_right_Ioi
end IoiChangeVariables
section IoiIntegrability
open Real
open scoped Interval
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- The substitution `y = x ^ p` in integrals over `Ioi 0` preserves integrability. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff [NormedSpace ℝ E] (f : ℝ → E) {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (|p| * x ^ (p - 1)) • f (x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioi 0) := by
let S := Ioi (0 : ℝ)
have a1 : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ S → HasDerivWithinAt (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) S x :=
fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_rpow_const (Or.inl (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne')).hasDerivWithinAt
have a2 : InjOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) S := by
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hp with (h | h)
· apply StrictAntiOn.injOn
intro x hx y hy hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv (rpow_pos_of_pos hx p) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy p), ← rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), ←
rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy)]
exact rpow_lt_rpow (le_of_lt hx) hxy (neg_pos.mpr h)
exact StrictMonoOn.injOn fun x hx y _hy hxy => rpow_lt_rpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le hxy h
have a3 : (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) '' S = S := by
ext1 x; rw [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩; exact rpow_pos_of_pos hy p
· intro hx; refine ⟨x ^ (1 / p), rpow_pos_of_pos hx _, ?_⟩
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx), one_div_mul_cancel hp, rpow_one]
have := integrableOn_image_iff_integrableOn_abs_deriv_smul measurableSet_Ioi a1 a2 f
rw [a3] at this
rw [this]
refine integrableOn_congr_fun (fun x hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioi
simp_rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt hx) _)]
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff
/-- The substitution `y = x ^ p` in integrals over `Ioi 0` preserves integrability (version
without `|p|` factor) -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegralEqImproper.lean | 1,203 | 1,206 | theorem integrableOn_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff' [NormedSpace ℝ E] (f : ℝ → E) {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => x ^ (p - 1) • f (x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioi 0) := by |
simpa only [← integrableOn_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff f hp, mul_smul] using
(integrable_smul_iff (abs_pos.mpr hp).ne' _).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
#align_import data.complex.exponential from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a8b2226cfb0a79f5986492053fc49b1a0c6aeffb"
/-!
# Exponential, trigonometric and hyperbolic trigonometric functions
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential, sine, cosine, tangent,
hyperbolic sine, hyperbolic cosine, and hyperbolic tangent functions.
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped Classical ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_abs_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq _root_.abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, abs (z ^ m / m.factorial) :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt (abs z)
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (abs.nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (abs z / n) (div_nonneg (abs.nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_abs, abs_abs, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul, ← div_div,
mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
#align complex.is_cau_abs_exp Complex.isCauSeq_abs_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_abs_exp z).of_abv
#align complex.is_cau_exp Complex.isCauSeq_exp
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ Complex.abs :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
#align complex.exp' Complex.exp'
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
-- Porting note: removed `irreducible` attribute, so I can prove things
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
#align complex.exp Complex.exp
/-- The complex sine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def sin (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
#align complex.sin Complex.sin
/-- The complex cosine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def cos (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
#align complex.cos Complex.cos
/-- The complex tangent function, defined as `sin z / cos z` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def tan (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
sin z / cos z
#align complex.tan Complex.tan
/-- The complex cotangent function, defined as `cos z / sin z` -/
def cot (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cos z / sin z
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def sinh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
#align complex.sinh Complex.sinh
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def cosh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
#align complex.cosh Complex.cosh
/-- The complex hyperbolic tangent function, defined as `sinh z / cosh z` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def tanh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
sinh z / cosh z
#align complex.tanh Complex.tanh
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
#align real.exp Real.exp
/-- The real sine function, defined as the real part of the complex sine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def sin (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(sin x).re
#align real.sin Real.sin
/-- The real cosine function, defined as the real part of the complex cosine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def cos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cos x).re
#align real.cos Real.cos
/-- The real tangent function, defined as the real part of the complex tangent -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def tan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(tan x).re
#align real.tan Real.tan
/-- The real cotangent function, defined as the real part of the complex cotangent -/
nonrec def cot (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cot x).re
/-- The real hypebolic sine function, defined as the real part of the complex hyperbolic sine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def sinh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(sinh x).re
#align real.sinh Real.sinh
/-- The real hypebolic cosine function, defined as the real part of the complex hyperbolic cosine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def cosh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cosh x).re
#align real.cosh Real.cosh
/-- The real hypebolic tangent function, defined as the real part of
the complex hyperbolic tangent -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def tanh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(tanh x).re
#align real.tanh Real.tanh
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- Porting note: ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
cases' j with j j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
#align complex.exp_zero Complex.exp_zero
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_abs_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
#align complex.exp_add Complex.exp_add
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp (Multiplicative.toAdd z),
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
#align complex.exp_list_sum Complex.exp_list_sum
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
#align complex.exp_multiset_sum Complex.exp_multiset_sum
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
#align complex.exp_sum Complex.exp_sum
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
#align complex.exp_nat_mul Complex.exp_nat_mul
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_self x, exp_add, h]; simp
#align complex.exp_ne_zero Complex.exp_ne_zero
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel (exp_ne_zero x)]
#align complex.exp_neg Complex.exp_neg
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align complex.exp_sub Complex.exp_sub
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
#align complex.exp_int_mul Complex.exp_int_mul
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.exp_conj Complex.exp_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_exp_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_exp_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_exp Complex.ofReal_exp
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.exp_of_real_im Complex.exp_ofReal_im
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
#align complex.exp_of_real_re Complex.exp_ofReal_re
theorem two_sinh : 2 * sinh x = exp x - exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_sinh Complex.two_sinh
theorem two_cosh : 2 * cosh x = exp x + exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_cosh Complex.two_cosh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_zero : sinh 0 = 0 := by simp [sinh]
#align complex.sinh_zero Complex.sinh_zero
@[simp]
theorem sinh_neg : sinh (-x) = -sinh x := by simp [sinh, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
#align complex.sinh_neg Complex.sinh_neg
private theorem sinh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a - b) * (c + d) + (a + b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c - b * d) := by ring
theorem sinh_add : sinh (x + y) = sinh x * cosh y + cosh x * sinh y := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_sinh, exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm, mul_add, ←
mul_assoc, two_sinh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh, ← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_cosh]
exact sinh_add_aux
#align complex.sinh_add Complex.sinh_add
@[simp]
theorem cosh_zero : cosh 0 = 1 := by simp [cosh]
#align complex.cosh_zero Complex.cosh_zero
@[simp]
theorem cosh_neg : cosh (-x) = cosh x := by simp [add_comm, cosh, exp_neg]
#align complex.cosh_neg Complex.cosh_neg
private theorem cosh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) + (a - b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
theorem cosh_add : cosh (x + y) = cosh x * cosh y + sinh x * sinh y := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_cosh, exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm, mul_add, ←
mul_assoc, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_sinh, ← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh]
exact cosh_add_aux
#align complex.cosh_add Complex.cosh_add
theorem sinh_sub : sinh (x - y) = sinh x * cosh y - cosh x * sinh y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sinh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.sinh_sub Complex.sinh_sub
theorem cosh_sub : cosh (x - y) = cosh x * cosh y - sinh x * sinh y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cosh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.cosh_sub Complex.cosh_sub
theorem sinh_conj : sinh (conj x) = conj (sinh x) := by
rw [sinh, ← RingHom.map_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← RingHom.map_sub, sinh, map_div₀]
-- Porting note: not nice
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align complex.sinh_conj Complex.sinh_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((sinh x).re : ℂ) = sinh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← sinh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_sinh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sinh (x : ℝ) : (Real.sinh x : ℂ) = sinh x :=
ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_sinh Complex.ofReal_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.sinh_of_real_im Complex.sinh_ofReal_im
theorem sinh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).re = Real.sinh x :=
rfl
#align complex.sinh_of_real_re Complex.sinh_ofReal_re
theorem cosh_conj : cosh (conj x) = conj (cosh x) := by
rw [cosh, ← RingHom.map_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← RingHom.map_add, cosh, map_div₀]
-- Porting note: not nice
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align complex.cosh_conj Complex.cosh_conj
theorem ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((cosh x).re : ℂ) = cosh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← cosh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_cosh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_cosh (x : ℝ) : (Real.cosh x : ℂ) = cosh x :=
ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_cosh Complex.ofReal_cosh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.cosh_of_real_im Complex.cosh_ofReal_im
@[simp]
theorem cosh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).re = Real.cosh x :=
rfl
#align complex.cosh_of_real_re Complex.cosh_ofReal_re
theorem tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh : tanh x = sinh x / cosh x :=
rfl
#align complex.tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh Complex.tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh
@[simp]
theorem tanh_zero : tanh 0 = 0 := by simp [tanh]
#align complex.tanh_zero Complex.tanh_zero
@[simp]
theorem tanh_neg : tanh (-x) = -tanh x := by simp [tanh, neg_div]
#align complex.tanh_neg Complex.tanh_neg
theorem tanh_conj : tanh (conj x) = conj (tanh x) := by
rw [tanh, sinh_conj, cosh_conj, ← map_div₀, tanh]
#align complex.tanh_conj Complex.tanh_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((tanh x).re : ℂ) = tanh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← tanh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_tanh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_tanh (x : ℝ) : (Real.tanh x : ℂ) = tanh x :=
ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_tanh Complex.ofReal_tanh
@[simp]
theorem tanh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.tanh_of_real_im Complex.tanh_ofReal_im
theorem tanh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).re = Real.tanh x :=
rfl
#align complex.tanh_of_real_re Complex.tanh_ofReal_re
@[simp]
theorem cosh_add_sinh : cosh x + sinh x = exp x := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add, two_cosh, two_sinh, add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
#align complex.cosh_add_sinh Complex.cosh_add_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_add_cosh : sinh x + cosh x = exp x := by rw [add_comm, cosh_add_sinh]
#align complex.sinh_add_cosh Complex.sinh_add_cosh
@[simp]
theorem exp_sub_cosh : exp x - cosh x = sinh x :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (sinh_add_cosh x).symm
#align complex.exp_sub_cosh Complex.exp_sub_cosh
@[simp]
theorem exp_sub_sinh : exp x - sinh x = cosh x :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (cosh_add_sinh x).symm
#align complex.exp_sub_sinh Complex.exp_sub_sinh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_sub_sinh : cosh x - sinh x = exp (-x) := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_sub, two_cosh, two_sinh, add_sub_sub_cancel, two_mul]
#align complex.cosh_sub_sinh Complex.cosh_sub_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_sub_cosh : sinh x - cosh x = -exp (-x) := by rw [← neg_sub, cosh_sub_sinh]
#align complex.sinh_sub_cosh Complex.sinh_sub_cosh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq : cosh x ^ 2 - sinh x ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [sq_sub_sq, cosh_add_sinh, cosh_sub_sinh, ← exp_add, add_neg_self, exp_zero]
#align complex.cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq Complex.cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq
theorem cosh_sq : cosh x ^ 2 = sinh x ^ 2 + 1 := by
rw [← cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq x]
ring
#align complex.cosh_sq Complex.cosh_sq
theorem sinh_sq : sinh x ^ 2 = cosh x ^ 2 - 1 := by
rw [← cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq x]
ring
#align complex.sinh_sq Complex.sinh_sq
theorem cosh_two_mul : cosh (2 * x) = cosh x ^ 2 + sinh x ^ 2 := by rw [two_mul, cosh_add, sq, sq]
#align complex.cosh_two_mul Complex.cosh_two_mul
theorem sinh_two_mul : sinh (2 * x) = 2 * sinh x * cosh x := by
rw [two_mul, sinh_add]
ring
#align complex.sinh_two_mul Complex.sinh_two_mul
theorem cosh_three_mul : cosh (3 * x) = 4 * cosh x ^ 3 - 3 * cosh x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, cosh_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cosh_two_mul, sinh_two_mul]
have h2 : sinh x * (2 * sinh x * cosh x) = 2 * cosh x * sinh x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, sinh_sq]
ring
#align complex.cosh_three_mul Complex.cosh_three_mul
theorem sinh_three_mul : sinh (3 * x) = 4 * sinh x ^ 3 + 3 * sinh x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, sinh_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cosh_two_mul, sinh_two_mul]
have h2 : cosh x * (2 * sinh x * cosh x) = 2 * sinh x * cosh x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, cosh_sq]
ring
#align complex.sinh_three_mul Complex.sinh_three_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin 0 = 0 := by simp [sin]
#align complex.sin_zero Complex.sin_zero
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg : sin (-x) = -sin x := by
simp [sin, sub_eq_add_neg, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
#align complex.sin_neg Complex.sin_neg
theorem two_sin : 2 * sin x = (exp (-x * I) - exp (x * I)) * I :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_sin Complex.two_sin
theorem two_cos : 2 * cos x = exp (x * I) + exp (-x * I) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_cos Complex.two_cos
theorem sinh_mul_I : sinh (x * I) = sin x * I := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_sinh, ← mul_assoc, two_sin, mul_assoc, I_mul_I,
mul_neg_one, neg_sub, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sinh_mul_I Complex.sinh_mul_I
theorem cosh_mul_I : cosh (x * I) = cos x := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_cosh, two_cos, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cosh_mul_I Complex.cosh_mul_I
theorem tanh_mul_I : tanh (x * I) = tan x * I := by
rw [tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh, cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_div_right_comm, tan]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.tanh_mul_I Complex.tanh_mul_I
theorem cos_mul_I : cos (x * I) = cosh x := by rw [← cosh_mul_I]; ring_nf; simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_mul_I Complex.cos_mul_I
theorem sin_mul_I : sin (x * I) = sinh x * I := by
have h : I * sin (x * I) = -sinh x := by
rw [mul_comm, ← sinh_mul_I]
ring_nf
simp
rw [← neg_neg (sinh x), ← h]
apply Complex.ext <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sin_mul_I Complex.sin_mul_I
theorem tan_mul_I : tan (x * I) = tanh x * I := by
rw [tan, sin_mul_I, cos_mul_I, mul_div_right_comm, tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.tan_mul_I Complex.tan_mul_I
theorem sin_add : sin (x + y) = sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y := by
rw [← mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I, add_mul, add_mul, mul_right_comm, ← sinh_mul_I,
mul_assoc, ← sinh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, sinh_add]
#align complex.sin_add Complex.sin_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos 0 = 1 := by simp [cos]
#align complex.cos_zero Complex.cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg : cos (-x) = cos x := by simp [cos, sub_eq_add_neg, exp_neg, add_comm]
#align complex.cos_neg Complex.cos_neg
private theorem cos_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) - (b - a) * (d - c) * -1 = 2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
theorem cos_add : cos (x + y) = cos x * cos y - sin x * sin y := by
rw [← cosh_mul_I, add_mul, cosh_add, cosh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I,
mul_mul_mul_comm, I_mul_I, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.cos_add Complex.cos_add
theorem sin_sub : sin (x - y) = sin x * cos y - cos x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align complex.sin_sub Complex.sin_sub
theorem cos_sub : cos (x - y) = cos x * cos y + sin x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align complex.cos_sub Complex.cos_sub
theorem sin_add_mul_I (x y : ℂ) : sin (x + y * I) = sin x * cosh y + cos x * sinh y * I := by
rw [sin_add, cos_mul_I, sin_mul_I, mul_assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sin_add_mul_I Complex.sin_add_mul_I
theorem sin_eq (z : ℂ) : sin z = sin z.re * cosh z.im + cos z.re * sinh z.im * I := by
convert sin_add_mul_I z.re z.im; exact (re_add_im z).symm
#align complex.sin_eq Complex.sin_eq
theorem cos_add_mul_I (x y : ℂ) : cos (x + y * I) = cos x * cosh y - sin x * sinh y * I := by
rw [cos_add, cos_mul_I, sin_mul_I, mul_assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_add_mul_I Complex.cos_add_mul_I
theorem cos_eq (z : ℂ) : cos z = cos z.re * cosh z.im - sin z.re * sinh z.im * I := by
convert cos_add_mul_I z.re z.im; exact (re_add_im z).symm
#align complex.cos_eq Complex.cos_eq
theorem sin_sub_sin : sin x - sin y = 2 * sin ((x - y) / 2) * cos ((x + y) / 2) := by
have s1 := sin_add ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
have s2 := sin_sub ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel_right, half_add_self] at s1
rw [div_sub_div_same, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, half_add_self] at s2
rw [s1, s2]
ring
#align complex.sin_sub_sin Complex.sin_sub_sin
theorem cos_sub_cos : cos x - cos y = -2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) := by
have s1 := cos_add ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
have s2 := cos_sub ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel_right, half_add_self] at s1
rw [div_sub_div_same, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, half_add_self] at s2
rw [s1, s2]
ring
#align complex.cos_sub_cos Complex.cos_sub_cos
theorem sin_add_sin : sin x + sin y = 2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := by
simpa using sin_sub_sin x (-y)
theorem cos_add_cos : cos x + cos y = 2 * cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := by
calc
cos x + cos y = cos ((x + y) / 2 + (x - y) / 2) + cos ((x + y) / 2 - (x - y) / 2) := ?_
_ =
cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) - sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) +
(cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) + sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2)) :=
?_
_ = 2 * cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := ?_
· congr <;> field_simp
· rw [cos_add, cos_sub]
ring
#align complex.cos_add_cos Complex.cos_add_cos
theorem sin_conj : sin (conj x) = conj (sin x) := by
rw [← mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I, ← conj_neg_I, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_mul,
sinh_conj, mul_neg, sinh_neg, sinh_mul_I, mul_neg]
#align complex.sin_conj Complex.sin_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_sin_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((sin x).re : ℂ) = sin x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← sin_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_sin_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_sin_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sin (x : ℝ) : (Real.sin x : ℂ) = sin x :=
ofReal_sin_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_sin Complex.ofReal_sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (sin x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sin_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.sin_of_real_im Complex.sin_ofReal_im
theorem sin_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (sin x).re = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align complex.sin_of_real_re Complex.sin_ofReal_re
theorem cos_conj : cos (conj x) = conj (cos x) := by
rw [← cosh_mul_I, ← conj_neg_I, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← cosh_mul_I, cosh_conj, mul_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.cos_conj Complex.cos_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_cos_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((cos x).re : ℂ) = cos x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← cos_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_cos_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_cos_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_cos (x : ℝ) : (Real.cos x : ℂ) = cos x :=
ofReal_cos_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_cos Complex.ofReal_cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (cos x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_cos_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.cos_of_real_im Complex.cos_ofReal_im
theorem cos_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (cos x).re = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align complex.cos_of_real_re Complex.cos_ofReal_re
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan 0 = 0 := by simp [tan]
#align complex.tan_zero Complex.tan_zero
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos : tan x = sin x / cos x :=
rfl
#align complex.tan_eq_sin_div_cos Complex.tan_eq_sin_div_cos
theorem tan_mul_cos {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) : tan x * cos x = sin x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hx]
#align complex.tan_mul_cos Complex.tan_mul_cos
@[simp]
theorem tan_neg : tan (-x) = -tan x := by simp [tan, neg_div]
#align complex.tan_neg Complex.tan_neg
theorem tan_conj : tan (conj x) = conj (tan x) := by rw [tan, sin_conj, cos_conj, ← map_div₀, tan]
#align complex.tan_conj Complex.tan_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_tan_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((tan x).re : ℂ) = tan x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← tan_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_tan_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_tan_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_tan (x : ℝ) : (Real.tan x : ℂ) = tan x :=
ofReal_tan_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_tan Complex.ofReal_tan
@[simp]
theorem tan_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (tan x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_tan_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.tan_of_real_im Complex.tan_ofReal_im
theorem tan_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (tan x).re = Real.tan x :=
rfl
#align complex.tan_of_real_re Complex.tan_ofReal_re
theorem cos_add_sin_I : cos x + sin x * I = exp (x * I) := by
rw [← cosh_add_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_add_sin_I Complex.cos_add_sin_I
theorem cos_sub_sin_I : cos x - sin x * I = exp (-x * I) := by
rw [neg_mul, ← cosh_sub_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_sub_sin_I Complex.cos_sub_sin_I
@[simp]
theorem sin_sq_add_cos_sq : sin x ^ 2 + cos x ^ 2 = 1 :=
Eq.trans (by rw [cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_pow, I_sq, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm])
(cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq (x * I))
#align complex.sin_sq_add_cos_sq Complex.sin_sq_add_cos_sq
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq : cos x ^ 2 + sin x ^ 2 = 1 := by rw [add_comm, sin_sq_add_cos_sq]
#align complex.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Complex.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem cos_two_mul' : cos (2 * x) = cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2 := by rw [two_mul, cos_add, ← sq, ← sq]
#align complex.cos_two_mul' Complex.cos_two_mul'
theorem cos_two_mul : cos (2 * x) = 2 * cos x ^ 2 - 1 := by
rw [cos_two_mul', eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 (sin_sq_add_cos_sq x), ← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub,
two_mul]
#align complex.cos_two_mul Complex.cos_two_mul
theorem sin_two_mul : sin (2 * x) = 2 * sin x * cos x := by
rw [two_mul, sin_add, two_mul, add_mul, mul_comm]
#align complex.sin_two_mul Complex.sin_two_mul
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 732 | 733 | theorem cos_sq : cos x ^ 2 = 1 / 2 + cos (2 * x) / 2 := by |
simp [cos_two_mul, div_add_div_same, mul_div_cancel_left₀, two_ne_zero, -one_div]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
#align uniform_space_of_dist UniformSpace.ofDist
-- Porting note: dropped the `dist_self` argument
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun x hx y => hx.elim⟩ (fun s ⟨c, hc⟩ t h => ⟨c, fun x hx y hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
#align bornology.of_dist Bornology.ofDistₓ
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
dist : α → α → ℝ
#align has_dist Dist
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
#noalign pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist_tac -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore
/-- Pseudo metric and Metric spaces
A pseudo metric space is endowed with a distance for which the requirement `d(x,y)=0 → x = y` might
not hold. A metric space is a pseudo metric space such that `d(x,y)=0 → x = y`.
Each pseudo metric space induces a canonical `UniformSpace` and hence a canonical
`TopologicalSpace` This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `UniformSpace`
structure. When instantiating a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure, the uniformity fields are not
necessary, they will be filled in by default. In the same way, each (pseudo) metric space induces a
(pseudo) emetric space structure. It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
-/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends Dist α : Type u where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y)
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add := by _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space PseudoMetricSpace
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with d _ _ _ ed hed U hU B hB
cases' m' with d' _ _ _ ed' hed' U' hU' B' hB'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
#align pseudo_metric_space.ext PseudoMetricSpace.ext
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_edist PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
#align pseudo_metric_space.of_dist_topology PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
#align dist_self dist_self
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
#align dist_comm dist_comm
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
#align edist_dist edist_dist
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
#align dist_triangle dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_left dist_triangle_left
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_right dist_triangle_right
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
#align dist_triangle4 dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_left dist_triangle4_left
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_right dist_triangle4_right
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, dist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
dist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ dist (f m) (f n) + dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_dist dist_le_Ico_sum_dist
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align dist_le_range_sum_dist dist_le_range_sum_dist
/-- A version of `dist_le_Ico_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le
/-- A version of `dist_le_range_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
#align swap_dist swap_dist
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
#align abs_dist_sub_le abs_dist_sub_le
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
#align dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align abs_dist abs_dist
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
#align has_nndist NNDist
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_nndist PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
#align dist_nndist dist_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
#align coe_nndist coe_nndist
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align edist_nndist edist_nndist
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
#align nndist_edist nndist_edist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
#align coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
#align edist_lt_coe edist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align edist_le_coe edist_le_coe
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align edist_lt_top edist_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
#align edist_ne_top edist_ne_top
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
#align nndist_self nndist_self
-- Porting note: `dist_nndist` and `coe_nndist` moved up
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_lt_coe dist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_le_coe dist_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
#align edist_lt_of_real edist_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
#align edist_le_of_real edist_le_ofReal
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align nndist_dist nndist_dist
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
#align nndist_comm nndist_comm
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle nndist_triangle
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_left nndist_triangle_left
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_right nndist_triangle_right
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
#align dist_edist dist_edist
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
#align metric.ball Metric.ball
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_ball Metric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball' Metric.mem_ball'
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
#align metric.pos_of_mem_ball Metric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_ball_self Metric.mem_ball_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_ball Metric.nonempty_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
#align metric.ball_eq_empty Metric.ball_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
#align metric.ball_zero Metric.ball_zero
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball Metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
#align metric.ball_eq_ball Metric.ball_eq_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
#align metric.ball_eq_ball' Metric.ball_eq_ball'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_ball_nat
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat_succ Metric.iUnion_ball_nat_succ
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
#align metric.closed_ball Metric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_closed_ball Metric.mem_closedBall
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball' Metric.mem_closedBall'
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
#align metric.sphere Metric.sphere
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_sphere Metric.mem_sphere
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
#align metric.mem_sphere' Metric.mem_sphere'
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
#align metric.ne_of_mem_sphere Metric.ne_of_mem_sphere
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
#align metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere Metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
#align metric.sphere_is_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball_self Metric.mem_closedBall_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_closed_ball Metric.nonempty_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_empty Metric.closedBall_eq_empty
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_sphere_of_nonpos Metric.closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
#align metric.ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.ball_subset_closedBall
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
#align metric.sphere_subset_closed_ball Metric.sphere_subset_closedBall
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_ball
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
#align metric.ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_closedBall
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.ball_disjoint_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_ball
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_closedBall
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
#align metric.sphere_disjoint_ball Metric.sphere_disjoint_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
#align metric.ball_union_sphere Metric.ball_union_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
#align metric.sphere_union_ball Metric.sphere_union_ball
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
#align metric.closed_ball_diff_sphere Metric.closedBall_diff_sphere
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
#align metric.closed_ball_diff_ball Metric.closedBall_diff_ball
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball_comm Metric.mem_ball_comm
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball_comm Metric.mem_closedBall_comm
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
#align metric.mem_sphere_comm Metric.mem_sphere_comm
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
#align metric.ball_subset_ball Metric.ball_subset_ball
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_bInter_ball Metric.closedBall_eq_bInter_ball
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
#align metric.ball_subset_ball' Metric.ball_subset_ball'
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.closedBall_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_closed_ball' Metric.closedBall_subset_closedBall'
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_ball Metric.closedBall_subset_ball
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_ball' Metric.closedBall_subset_ball'
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
#align metric.dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closed_ball_inter_closed_ball Metric.dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closed_ball_inter_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closed_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_closed_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_closedBall_nat
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
#align metric.Union_inter_closed_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
#align metric.ball_subset Metric.ball_subset
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
#align metric.ball_half_subset Metric.ball_half_subset
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
#align metric.exists_ball_subset_ball Metric.exists_ball_subset_ball
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
#align metric.forall_of_forall_mem_closed_ball Metric.forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
#align metric.forall_of_forall_mem_ball Metric.forall_of_forall_mem_ball
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
#align metric.is_bounded_iff Metric.isBounded_iff
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_eventually Metric.isBounded_iff_eventually
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_exists_ge Metric.isBounded_iff_exists_ge
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_nndist Metric.isBounded_iff_nndist
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
#align metric.to_uniform_space_eq Metric.toUniformSpace_eq
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
#align metric.mk_uniformity_basis Metric.mk_uniformity_basis
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_rat Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_rat
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_pow Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_pow
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_lt Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_lt
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
#align metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
#align metric.mem_uniformity_dist Metric.mem_uniformity_dist
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, id⟩
#align metric.dist_mem_uniformity Metric.dist_mem_uniformity
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.uniform_continuous_iff Metric.uniformContinuous_iff
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.uniform_continuous_on_iff Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
#align metric.uniform_continuous_on_iff_le Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff_le
nonrec theorem uniformInducing_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
uniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_dist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, gt_iff_lt, preimage_setOf_eq, Prod.map_apply, mem_setOf]
nonrec theorem uniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ := by
rw [uniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, uniformInducing_iff]
#align metric.uniform_embedding_iff Metric.uniformEmbedding_iff
/-- If a map between pseudometric spaces is a uniform embedding then the distance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`. -/
theorem controlled_of_uniformEmbedding [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : UniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (uniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
#align metric.controlled_of_uniform_embedding Metric.controlled_of_uniformEmbedding
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.totallyBounded_iff
#align metric.totally_bounded_iff Metric.totallyBounded_iff
/-- A pseudometric space is totally bounded if one can reconstruct up to any ε>0 any element of the
space from finitely many data. -/
theorem totallyBounded_of_finite_discretization {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ),
∃ (β : Type u) (_ : Fintype β) (F : s → β), ∀ x y, F x = F y → dist (x : α) y < ε) :
TotallyBounded s := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rw [hs]
exact totallyBounded_empty
rcases hs with ⟨x0, hx0⟩
haveI : Inhabited s := ⟨⟨x0, hx0⟩⟩
refine totallyBounded_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases H ε ε0 with ⟨β, fβ, F, hF⟩
let Finv := Function.invFun F
refine ⟨range (Subtype.val ∘ Finv), finite_range _, fun x xs => ?_⟩
let x' := Finv (F ⟨x, xs⟩)
have : F x' = F ⟨x, xs⟩ := Function.invFun_eq ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, ⟨F ⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩, hF _ _ this.symm⟩
#align metric.totally_bounded_of_finite_discretization Metric.totallyBounded_of_finite_discretization
theorem finite_approx_of_totallyBounded {s : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε := by
intro ε ε_pos
rw [totallyBounded_iff_subset] at hs
exact hs _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε_pos)
#align metric.finite_approx_of_totally_bounded Metric.finite_approx_of_totallyBounded
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `dist` -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter β} :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n : ι × β in p ×ˢ p', dist (f n.snd) (F n.fst n.snd) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hn => hε hn
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_iff Metric.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, dist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
#align metric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on_iff Metric.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, dist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_on_iff Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, dist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, nhdsWithin_univ,
mem_univ, forall_const, exists_prop]
#align metric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_iff Metric.tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, dist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff]
simp
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_iff Metric.tendstoUniformly_iff
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, dist x y < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.cauchy_iff
#align metric.cauchy_iff Metric.cauchy_iff
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball Metric.nhds_basis_ball
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
#align metric.mem_nhds_iff Metric.mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
#align metric.eventually_nhds_iff Metric.eventually_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
#align metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball Metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ {x}, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ {i}, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
#align metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ {i}, pa i → ∀ {x}, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
#align metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff Metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
#align metric.nhds_basis_closed_ball Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ Metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos Metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_pow Metric.nhds_basis_ball_pow
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
#align metric.nhds_basis_closed_ball_pow Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall_pow
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
#align metric.is_open_iff Metric.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
#align metric.is_open_ball Metric.isOpen_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
#align metric.ball_mem_nhds Metric.ball_mem_nhds
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds Metric.closedBall_mem_nhds
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds_of_mem Metric.closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
#align metric.nhds_within_basis_ball Metric.nhdsWithin_basis_ball
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
#align metric.mem_nhds_within_iff Metric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds_within Metric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and_iff]
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_at_iff Metric.continuousAt_iff
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_within_at_iff Metric.continuousWithinAt_iff
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
#align metric.continuous_on_iff Metric.continuousOn_iff
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
#align metric.continuous_iff Metric.continuous_iff
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
#align metric.tendsto_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhds
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_at_iff' Metric.continuousAt_iff'
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_within_at_iff' Metric.continuousWithinAt_iff'
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
#align metric.continuous_on_iff' Metric.continuousOn_iff'
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
#align metric.continuous_iff' Metric.continuous_iff'
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
#align metric.tendsto_at_top Metric.tendsto_atTop
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
#align metric.tendsto_at_top' Metric.tendsto_atTop'
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
#align metric.is_open_singleton_iff Metric.isOpen_singleton_iff
/-- Given a point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a pseudometric space, there is an open ball
centered at `x` and intersecting `s` only at `x`. -/
theorem exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete [DiscreteTopology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ ε > 0, Metric.ball x ε ∩ s = {x} :=
nhds_basis_ball.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align metric.exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete Metric.exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
/-- Given a point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a pseudometric space, there is a closed ball
of positive radius centered at `x` and intersecting `s` only at `x`. -/
theorem exists_closedBall_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ ε > 0, Metric.closedBall x ε ∩ s = {x} :=
nhds_basis_closedBall.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align metric.exists_closed_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete Metric.exists_closedBall_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
#align dense.exists_dist_lt Dense.exists_dist_lt
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
#align dense_range.exists_dist_lt DenseRange.exists_dist_lt
end Metric
open Metric
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
#align metric.uniformity_edist Metric.uniformity_edist
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_pseudo_emetric_space PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace
/-- Expressing the uniformity in terms of `edist` -/
@[deprecated _root_.uniformity_basis_edist]
protected theorem Metric.uniformity_basis_edist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
uniformity_basis_edist
#align pseudo_metric.uniformity_basis_edist Metric.uniformity_basis_edist
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
#align metric.eball_top_eq_univ Metric.eball_top_eq_univ
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align metric.emetric_ball Metric.emetric_ball
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_ball]
simp
#align metric.emetric_ball_nnreal Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
EMetric.closedBall x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = closedBall x ε := by
ext y; simp [edist_le_ofReal h]
#align metric.emetric_closed_ball Metric.emetric_closedBall
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} :
EMetric.closedBall x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_closedBall ε.coe_nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align metric.emetric_closed_ball_nnreal Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_top (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ⊤ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => edist_lt_top _ _
#align metric.emetric_ball_top Metric.emetric_ball_top
theorem Metric.inseparable_iff {x y : α} : Inseparable x y ↔ dist x y = 0 := by
rw [EMetric.inseparable_iff, edist_nndist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
#align metric.inseparable_iff Metric.inseparable_iff
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled uniform structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given uniform structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_dist := H.trans PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist }
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_uniformity PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : m.replaceUniformity H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_uniformity_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq
-- ensure that the bornology is unchanged when replacing the uniformity.
example {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity m H).toBornology = m.toBornology := rfl
/-- Build a new pseudo metric space from an old one where the bundled topological structure is
provably (but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given topological structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : PseudoMetricSpace γ :=
@PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity γ (m.toUniformSpace.replaceTopology H) m rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_topology PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : m.replaceTopology H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_topology_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the pseudoemetric space. In this definition, the
distance is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the
push-forward of the edistance to reals. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist {α : Type u} [e : PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ) (edist_ne_top : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀ x y, dist x y = ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) : PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist := dist
dist_self x := by simp [h]
dist_comm x y := by simp [h, edist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
simp only [h]
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_add (edist_triangle _ _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _)
edist := edist
edist_dist _ _ := by simp only [h, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _)]
toUniformSpace := e.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := e.uniformity_edist.trans <| by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (edist_ne_top _ _), h]
using (Metric.uniformity_edist_aux fun x y : α => (edist x y).toNNReal).symm
#align pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space_of_dist PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the emetric space. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist (fun x y => ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) h fun _ _ =>
rfl
#align pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled bornology structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given bornology structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toBornology := B
cobounded_sets := Set.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 fun s =>
(H s).trans <| by rw [isBounded_iff, mem_setOf_eq, compl_compl] }
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_bornology PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq {α} [m : PseudoMetricSpace α] [B : Bornology α]
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology _ H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_bornology_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq
-- ensure that the uniformity is unchanged when replacing the bornology.
example {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology m H).toUniformSpace = m.toUniformSpace := rfl
section Real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a pseudometric space. -/
instance Real.pseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ where
dist x y := |x - y|
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero]
dist_comm x y := abs_sub_comm _ _
dist_triangle x y z := abs_sub_le _ _ _
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
#align real.pseudo_metric_space Real.pseudoMetricSpace
theorem Real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = |x - y| := rfl
#align real.dist_eq Real.dist_eq
theorem Real.nndist_eq (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (x - y) := rfl
#align real.nndist_eq Real.nndist_eq
theorem Real.nndist_eq' (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (y - x) :=
nndist_comm _ _
#align real.nndist_eq' Real.nndist_eq'
theorem Real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = |x| := by simp [Real.dist_eq]
#align real.dist_0_eq_abs Real.dist_0_eq_abs
theorem Real.sub_le_dist (x y : ℝ) : x - y ≤ dist x y := by
rw [Real.dist_eq, le_abs]
exact Or.inl (le_refl _)
theorem Real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y z : ℝ} (h : y ∈ uIcc x z) : dist x y ≤ dist x z := by
simpa only [dist_comm x] using abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc h
#align real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y z : ℝ} (h : y ∈ uIcc x z) : dist y z ≤ dist x z := by
simpa only [dist_comm _ z] using abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc h
#align real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y x' y' : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ uIcc x' y') (hy : y ∈ uIcc x' y') :
dist x y ≤ dist x' y' :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc (by rwa [uIcc_comm]) (by rwa [uIcc_comm])
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc {x y x' y' : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc x' y') (hy : y ∈ Icc x' y') :
dist x y ≤ y' - x' := by
simpa only [Real.dist_eq, abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 <| hx.1.trans hx.2), neg_sub] using
Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc (Icc_subset_uIcc hx) (Icc_subset_uIcc hy)
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
dist x y ≤ 1 := by simpa only [sub_zero] using Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc hx hy
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01
instance : OrderTopology ℝ :=
orderTopology_of_nhds_abs fun x => by
simp only [nhds_basis_ball.eq_biInf, ball, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_comm]
theorem Real.ball_eq_Ioo (x r : ℝ) : ball x r = Ioo (x - r) (x + r) :=
Set.ext fun y => by
rw [mem_ball, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_lt_iff, mem_Ioo, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
sub_lt_comm]
#align real.ball_eq_Ioo Real.ball_eq_Ioo
theorem Real.closedBall_eq_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closedBall x r = Icc (x - r) (x + r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add',
sub_le_comm]
#align real.closed_ball_eq_Icc Real.closedBall_eq_Icc
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PseudoMetric.lean | 1,399 | 1,401 | theorem Real.Ioo_eq_ball (x y : ℝ) : Ioo x y = ball ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by |
rw [Real.ball_eq_Ioo, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import geometry.euclidean.inversion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
/-!
# Inversion in an affine space
In this file we define inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to
the point `y` such that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center
and the radius the sphere.
In many applications, it is convenient to assume that the inversions swaps the center and the point
at infinity. In order to stay in the original affine space, we define the map so that it sends
center to itself.
Currently, we prove only a few basic lemmas needed to prove Ptolemy's inequality, see
`EuclideanGeometry.mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Metric Function AffineMap Set AffineSubspace
open scoped Topology
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {a b c d x y z : P} {r R : ℝ}
/-- Inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to the point `y` such
that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center and the radius the
sphere. -/
def inversion (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) : P :=
(R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) +ᵥ c
#align euclidean_geometry.inversion EuclideanGeometry.inversion
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: added to replace simp [inversion] -/
theorem inversion_def :
inversion = fun (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) => (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) +ᵥ c :=
rfl
/-!
### Basic properties
In this section we prove that `EuclideanGeometry.inversion c R` is involutive and preserves the
sphere `Metric.sphere c R`. We also prove that the distance to the center of the image of `x` under
this inversion is given by `R ^ 2 / dist x c`.
-/
theorem inversion_eq_lineMap (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c R x = lineMap c x ((R / dist x c) ^ 2) :=
rfl
theorem inversion_vsub_center (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c R x -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) :=
vadd_vsub _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.inversion_vsub_center EuclideanGeometry.inversion_vsub_center
@[simp]
theorem inversion_self (c : P) (R : ℝ) : inversion c R c = c := by simp [inversion]
#align euclidean_geometry.inversion_self EuclideanGeometry.inversion_self
@[simp]
theorem inversion_zero_radius (c x : P) : inversion c 0 x = c := by simp [inversion]
theorem inversion_mul (c : P) (a R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c (a * R) x = homothety c (a ^ 2) (inversion c R x) := by
simp only [inversion_eq_lineMap, ← homothety_eq_lineMap, ← homothety_mul_apply, mul_div_assoc,
mul_pow]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_dist_center (c x : P) : inversion c (dist x c) x = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hne)
· apply inversion_self
· rw [inversion, div_self, one_pow, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
rwa [dist_ne_zero]
#align euclidean_geometry.inversion_dist_center EuclideanGeometry.inversion_dist_center
@[simp]
theorem inversion_dist_center' (c x : P) : inversion c (dist c x) x = x := by
rw [dist_comm, inversion_dist_center]
theorem inversion_of_mem_sphere (h : x ∈ Metric.sphere c R) : inversion c R x = x :=
h.out ▸ inversion_dist_center c x
#align euclidean_geometry.inversion_of_mem_sphere EuclideanGeometry.inversion_of_mem_sphere
/-- Distance from the image of a point under inversion to the center. This formula accidentally
works for `x = c`. -/
theorem dist_inversion_center (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist (inversion c R x) c = R ^ 2 / dist x c := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hx)
· simp
have : dist x c ≠ 0 := dist_ne_zero.2 hx
field_simp [inversion, norm_smul, abs_div, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, sq, mul_assoc]
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_inversion_center EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_center
/-- Distance from the center of an inversion to the image of a point under the inversion. This
formula accidentally works for `x = c`. -/
theorem dist_center_inversion (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist c (inversion c R x) = R ^ 2 / dist c x := by
rw [dist_comm c, dist_comm c, dist_inversion_center]
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_center_inversion EuclideanGeometry.dist_center_inversion
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Inversion/Basic.lean | 112 | 119 | theorem inversion_inversion (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) (x : P) :
inversion c R (inversion c R x) = x := by |
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hne)
· rw [inversion_self, inversion_self]
· rw [inversion, dist_inversion_center, inversion_vsub_center, smul_smul, ← mul_pow,
div_mul_div_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (dist_ne_zero.2 hne), ← sq, div_self, one_pow, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
exact pow_ne_zero _ hR
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
#align finset.univ_fin2 Finset.univ_fin2
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply_const Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_congr Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_weights_eq Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_sum_eq_zero Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
erw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_erase Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_insert Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_indicator_subset Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_map Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_map
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
#align finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weighted_vsub_of_point Finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_sdiff Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_sdiff_sub Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `s.filter pred`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
(s.filter pred).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_subtype_eq_filter Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter
/-- A weighted sum over `s.filter pred` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
(s.filter pred).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_filter_of_ne Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_const_smul Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
#align finset.weighted_vsub Finset.weightedVSub
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_apply Finset.weightedVSub_apply
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_of_sum_eq_zero Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_apply_const Finset.weightedVSub_apply_const
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_empty Finset.weightedVSub_empty
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_congr Finset.weightedVSub_congr
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
#align finset.weighted_vsub_indicator_subset Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_map Finset.weightedVSub_map
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weighted_vsub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
#align finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weighted_vsub Finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_sdiff Finset.weightedVSub_sdiff
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_sdiff_sub Finset.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `s.filter pred`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
(s.filter pred).weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_subtype_eq_filter Finset.weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter
/-- A weighted sum over `s.filter pred` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : (s.filter pred).weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
#align finset.weighted_vsub_filter_of_ne Finset.weightedVSub_filter_of_ne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_const_smul Finset.weightedVSub_const_smul
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
#align finset.affine_combination Finset.affineCombination
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
#align finset.affine_combination_linear Finset.affineCombination_linear
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
#align finset.affine_combination_apply Finset.affineCombination_apply
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
#align finset.affine_combination_apply_const Finset.affineCombination_apply_const
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
#align finset.affine_combination_congr Finset.affineCombination_congr
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
#align finset.affine_combination_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_of_sum_eq_one Finset.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vadd_affine_combination Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
#align finset.affine_combination_vsub Finset.affineCombination_vsub
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
#align finset.attach_affine_combination_of_injective Finset.attach_affineCombination_of_injective
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
#align finset.attach_affine_combination_coe Finset.attach_affineCombination_coe
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_eq_linear_combination Finset.weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
#align finset.affine_combination_eq_linear_combination Finset.affineCombination_eq_linear_combination
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
· simp [hw0 i2 hi2 h]
#align finset.affine_combination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero Finset.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero
/-- An affine combination is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem affineCombination_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h]
#align finset.affine_combination_indicator_subset Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset
/-- An affine combination, over the image of an embedding, equals an
affine combination with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem affineCombination_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_map]
#align finset.affine_combination_map Finset.affineCombination_map
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `affineCombination`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_affine_combination_vsub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affine_combination_vsub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = p₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
#align finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affine_combination Finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of affine combinations over two subsets. -/
theorem affineCombination_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).affineCombination k p w -ᵥ s₂.affineCombination k p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub h _ _
#align finset.affine_combination_sdiff_sub Finset.affineCombination_sdiff_sub
/-- If a weighted sum is zero and one of the weights is `-1`, the corresponding point is
the affine combination of the other points with the given weights. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one {w : ι → k} {p : ι → P}
(hw : s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V)) {i : ι} [DecidablePred (· ≠ i)] (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = -1) : (s.filter (· ≠ i)).affineCombination k p w = p i := by
classical
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, ← hw,
← s.affineCombination_sdiff_sub (singleton_subset_iff.2 his), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
← filter_ne']
congr
refine (affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_singleton_self _) ?_ ?_).symm
· simp [hwi]
· simp
#align finset.affine_combination_eq_of_weighted_vsub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one Finset.affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one
/-- An affine combination over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `s.filter pred`. -/
theorem affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).affineCombination k (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
(s.filter pred).affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter]
#align finset.affine_combination_subtype_eq_filter Finset.affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter
/-- An affine combination over `s.filter pred` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices
in `s` not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem affineCombination_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
(s.filter pred).affineCombination k p w = s.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h]
#align finset.affine_combination_filter_of_ne Finset.affineCombination_filter_of_ne
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with a given sum of weights if and only if it can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` with that sum of weights for the
corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype {v : V} {x : k} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} {b : P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i : s => p i) b w := by
classical
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨fs, hfs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fs.subtype s, fun i => w i, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs, (sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨fs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
refine
⟨fs.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, fun i =>
if h : i ∈ s then w ⟨i, h⟩ else 0, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp
#align finset.eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_subset_iff_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_subtype Finset.eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable (k)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as `weightedVSub` using
a `Finset` lying within that subset and with sum of weights 0 if and
only if it can be expressed as `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0
for the corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype {v : V} {s : Set ι} {p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub (fun i : s => p i) w :=
eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
#align finset.eq_weighted_vsub_subset_iff_eq_weighted_vsub_subtype Finset.eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype
variable (V)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A point can be expressed as an
`affineCombination` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with sum of weights 1 if and only if it can be expressed an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 for the corresponding
indexed family whose index type is the subtype corresponding to that
subset. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype {p0 : P} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k (fun i : s => p i) w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
#align finset.eq_affine_combination_subset_iff_eq_affine_combination_subtype Finset.eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype
variable {k V}
/-- Affine maps commute with affine combinations. -/
theorem map_affineCombination {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
(p : ι → P) (w : ι → k) (hw : s.sum w = 1) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
f (s.affineCombination k p w) = s.affineCombination k (f ∘ p) w := by
have b := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V P).nonempty
have b₂ := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V₂ P₂).nonempty
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw b,
s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw b₂, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw (f b) b₂]
simp only [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, RingHom.id_apply, AffineMap.map_vadd,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, map_sum, Function.comp_apply]
#align finset.map_affine_combination Finset.map_affineCombination
variable (k)
/-- Weights for expressing a single point as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : ι → k :=
Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i 1
#align finset.affine_combination_single_weights Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i i = 1 := by simp [affineCombinationSingleWeights]
#align finset.affine_combination_single_weights_apply_self Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : j ≠ i) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 0 := by simp [affineCombinationSingleWeights, h]
#align finset.affine_combination_single_weights_apply_of_ne Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (h : i ∈ s) :
∑ j ∈ s, affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 1 := by
rw [← affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self k i]
exact sum_eq_single_of_mem i h fun j _ hj => affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne k hj
#align finset.sum_affine_combination_single_weights Finset.sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights
/-- Weights for expressing the subtraction of two points as a `weightedVSub`. -/
def weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) : ι → k :=
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i - affineCombinationSingleWeights k j
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i i = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_self Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_self
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j i = 1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_apply_left Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j j = -1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h.symm]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_apply_right Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i) (hj : t ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, hi, hj]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_apply_of_ne Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) :
∑ t ∈ s, weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib]
simp [hi, hj]
#align finset.sum_weighted_vsub_vsub_weights Finset.sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights
variable {k}
/-- Weights for expressing `lineMap` as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) (c : k) : ι → k :=
c • weightedVSubVSubWeights k j i + affineCombinationSingleWeights k i
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i i c = affineCombinationSingleWeights k i := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_self Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_self
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c i = 1 - c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm, sub_eq_neg_add]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_apply_left Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c j = c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_apply_right Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i)
(hj : t ≠ j) (c : k) : affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 0 := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, hi, hj]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_apply_of_ne Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(c : k) : ∑ t ∈ s, affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 1 := by
simp_rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, Pi.add_apply, sum_add_distrib]
simp [hi, hj, ← mul_sum]
#align finset.sum_affine_combination_line_map_weights Finset.sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights
variable (k)
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationSingleWeights` gives the specified point. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationSingleWeights k i) = p i := by
refine s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ hi (by simp) ?_
rintro j - hj
simp [hj]
#align finset.affine_combination_affine_combination_single_weights Finset.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights
/-- A weighted subtraction with `weightedVSubVSubWeights` gives the result of subtracting the
specified points. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hj : j ∈ s) : s.weightedVSub p (weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j) = p i -ᵥ p j := by
rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, ← affineCombination_vsub,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hj]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_weighted_vsub_vsub_weights Finset.weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights
variable {k}
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationLineMapWeights` gives the result of
`line_map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (c : k) :
s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c) =
AffineMap.lineMap (p i) (p j) c := by
rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, ← weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination,
weightedVSub_const_smul, s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights k p hj hi, AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
#align finset.affine_combination_affine_combination_line_map_weights Finset.affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights
end Finset
namespace Finset
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- The weights for the centroid of some points. -/
def centroidWeights : ι → k :=
Function.const ι (card s : k)⁻¹
#align finset.centroid_weights Finset.centroidWeights
/-- `centroidWeights` at any point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroidWeights_apply (i : ι) : s.centroidWeights k i = (card s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_weights_apply Finset.centroidWeights_apply
/-- `centroidWeights` equals a constant function. -/
theorem centroidWeights_eq_const : s.centroidWeights k = Function.const ι (card s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_weights_eq_const Finset.centroidWeights_eq_const
variable {k}
/-- The weights in the centroid sum to 1, if the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero (h : (card s : k) ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by simp [h]
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero
variable (k)
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] (h : card s ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by
-- Porting note: `simp` cannot find `mul_inv_cancel` and does not use `norm_cast`
simp only [centroidWeights_apply, sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, ne_eq, Nat.cast_eq_zero, card_eq_zero]
refine mul_inv_cancel ?_
norm_cast
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (ne_of_gt (card_pos.2 h))
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_nonempty Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] {n : ℕ} (h : card s = n + 1) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (h.symm ▸ Nat.succ_ne_zero n)
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one
/-- The centroid of some points. Although defined for any `s`, this
is intended to be used in the case where the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
def centroid (p : ι → P) : P :=
s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k)
#align finset.centroid Finset.centroid
/-- The definition of the centroid. -/
theorem centroid_def (p : ι → P) : s.centroid k p = s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_def Finset.centroid_def
theorem centroid_univ (s : Finset P) : univ.centroid k ((↑) : s → P) = s.centroid k id := by
rw [centroid, centroid, ← s.attach_affineCombination_coe]
congr
ext
simp
#align finset.centroid_univ Finset.centroid_univ
/-- The centroid of a single point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroid_singleton (p : ι → P) (i : ι) : ({i} : Finset ι).centroid k p = p i := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply]
#align finset.centroid_singleton Finset.centroid_singleton
/-- The centroid of two points, expressed directly as adding a vector
to a point. -/
theorem centroid_pair [DecidableEq ι] [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : ι → P) (i₁ i₂ : ι) :
({i₁, i₂} : Finset ι).centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p i₂ -ᵥ p i₁) +ᵥ p i₁ := by
by_cases h : i₁ = i₂
· simp [h]
· have hc : (card ({i₁, i₂} : Finset ι) : k) ≠ 0 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
norm_num
exact nonzero_of_invertible _
rw [centroid_def,
affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one _ _ _
(sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero _ hc) (p i₁)]
simp [h, one_add_one_eq_two]
#align finset.centroid_pair Finset.centroid_pair
/-- The centroid of two points indexed by `Fin 2`, expressed directly
as adding a vector to the first point. -/
theorem centroid_pair_fin [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : Fin 2 → P) :
univ.centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p 1 -ᵥ p 0) +ᵥ p 0 := by
rw [univ_fin2]
convert centroid_pair k p 0 1
#align finset.centroid_pair_fin Finset.centroid_pair_fin
/-- A centroid, over the image of an embedding, equals a centroid with
the same points and weights over the original `Finset`. -/
theorem centroid_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).centroid k p = s₂.centroid k (p ∘ e) := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_map, centroidWeights]
#align finset.centroid_map Finset.centroid_map
/-- `centroidWeights` gives the weights for the centroid as a
constant function, which is suitable when summing over the points
whose centroid is being taken. This function gives the weights in a
form suitable for summing over a larger set of points, as an indicator
function that is zero outside the set whose centroid is being taken.
In the case of a `Fintype`, the sum may be over `univ`. -/
def centroidWeightsIndicator : ι → k :=
Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k)
#align finset.centroid_weights_indicator Finset.centroidWeightsIndicator
/-- The definition of `centroidWeightsIndicator`. -/
theorem centroidWeightsIndicator_def :
s.centroidWeightsIndicator k = Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_weights_indicator_def Finset.centroidWeightsIndicator_def
/-- The sum of the weights for the centroid indexed by a `Fintype`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator [Fintype ι] :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = ∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i :=
sum_indicator_subset _ (subset_univ _)
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is not
zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] [Fintype ι]
(h : card s ≠ 0) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k h
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty k h
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator_eq_one_of_nonempty Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_nonempty
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ}
(h : card s = n + 1) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one k h
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one
/-- The centroid as an affine combination over a `Fintype`. -/
theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
s.centroid k p = univ.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeightsIndicator k) :=
affineCombination_indicator_subset _ _ (subset_univ _)
#align finset.centroid_eq_affine_combination_fintype Finset.centroid_eq_affineCombination_fintype
/-- An indexed family of points that is injective on the given
`Finset` has the same centroid as the image of that `Finset`. This is
stated in terms of a set equal to the image to provide control of
definitional equality for the index type used for the centroid of the
image. -/
theorem centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on {p : ι → P}
(hi : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i = p j → i = j) {ps : Set P} [Fintype ps]
(hps : ps = p '' ↑s) : s.centroid k p = (univ : Finset ps).centroid k fun x => (x : P) := by
let f : p '' ↑s → ι := fun x => x.property.choose
have hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ s ∧ p (f x) = x := fun x => x.property.choose_spec
let f' : ps → ι := fun x => f ⟨x, hps ▸ x.property⟩
have hf' : ∀ x, f' x ∈ s ∧ p (f' x) = x := fun x => hf ⟨x, hps ▸ x.property⟩
have hf'i : Function.Injective f' := by
intro x y h
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, ← (hf' x).2, ← (hf' y).2, h]
let f'e : ps ↪ ι := ⟨f', hf'i⟩
have hu : Finset.univ.map f'e = s := by
ext x
rw [mem_map]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, _, rfl⟩
exact (hf' i).1
· intro hx
use ⟨p x, hps.symm ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩, mem_univ _
refine hi _ (hf' _).1 _ hx ?_
rw [(hf' _).2]
rw [← hu, centroid_map]
congr with x
change p (f' x) = ↑x
rw [(hf' x).2]
#align finset.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on Finset.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on
/-- Two indexed families of points that are injective on the given
`Finset`s and with the same points in the image of those `Finset`s
have the same centroid. -/
theorem centroid_eq_of_inj_on_of_image_eq {p : ι → P}
(hi : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i = p j → i = j) {p₂ : ι₂ → P}
(hi₂ : ∀ i ∈ s₂, ∀ j ∈ s₂, p₂ i = p₂ j → i = j) (he : p '' ↑s = p₂ '' ↑s₂) :
s.centroid k p = s₂.centroid k p₂ := by
classical rw [s.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on k hi rfl,
s₂.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on k hi₂ he]
#align finset.centroid_eq_of_inj_on_of_image_eq Finset.centroid_eq_of_inj_on_of_image_eq
end Finset
section AffineSpace'
variable {ι k V P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [AffineSpace V P]
/-- A `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0 is in the `vectorSpan` of
an indexed family. -/
theorem weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(p : ι → P) : s.weightedVSub p w ∈ vectorSpan k (Set.range p) := by
classical
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with (hι | ⟨⟨i0⟩⟩)
· simp [Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty s]
· rw [vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right k p i0, ← Set.image_univ,
Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total,
Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p h (p i0),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
let w' := Set.indicator (↑s) w
have hwx : ∀ i, w' i ≠ 0 → i ∈ s := fun i => Set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero
use Finsupp.onFinset s w' hwx, Set.subset_univ _
rw [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.onFinset_sum hwx]
· apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i hi
simp [w', Set.indicator_apply, if_pos hi]
· exact fun _ => zero_smul k _
#align weighted_vsub_mem_vector_span weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan
/-- An `affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 is in the
`affineSpan` of an indexed family, if the underlying ring is
nontrivial. -/
theorem affineCombination_mem_affineSpan [Nontrivial k] {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k}
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) := by
classical
have hnz : ∑ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 := h.symm ▸ one_ne_zero
have hn : s.Nonempty := Finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero hnz
cases' hn with i1 hi1
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i1 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
simp only [Function.const_zero, Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi1, Pi.zero_apply,
Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i1 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi1 (Function.update_same _ _ _) fun _ _ hne =>
Function.update_noteq hne _ _
have hv : s.affineCombination k p w -ᵥ p i1 ∈ (affineSpan k (Set.range p)).direction := by
rw [direction_affineSpan, ← hw1s, Finset.affineCombination_vsub]
apply weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan
-- Porting note: Rest was `simp [Pi.sub_apply, h, hw1]`,
-- but `Pi.sub_apply` transforms the goal into nonsense
change (Finset.sum s fun i => w i - w1 i) = 0
simp only [Finset.sum_sub_distrib, h, hw1, sub_self]
rw [← vsub_vadd (s.affineCombination k p w) (p i1)]
exact AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv (mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_range_self _))
#align affine_combination_mem_affine_span affineCombination_mem_affineSpan
variable (k)
/-- A vector is in the `vectorSpan` of an indexed family if and only
if it is a `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0. -/
theorem mem_vectorSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSub {v : V} {p : ι → P} :
v ∈ vectorSpan k (Set.range p) ↔
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 ∧ v = s.weightedVSub p w := by
classical
constructor
· rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with (hι | ⟨⟨i0⟩⟩)
swap
· rw [vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right k p i0, ← Set.image_univ,
Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total]
rintro ⟨l, _, hv⟩
use insert i0 l.support
set w :=
(l : ι → k) - Function.update (Function.const ι 0 : ι → k) i0 (∑ i ∈ l.support, l i) with
hwdef
use w
have hw : ∑ i ∈ insert i0 l.support, w i = 0 := by
rw [hwdef]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _),
Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.1]
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, Finset.mem_insert, true_or, not_true,
Function.const_apply, Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, sub_self]
use hw
have hz : w i0 • (p i0 -ᵥ p i0 : V) = 0 := (vsub_self (p i0)).symm ▸ smul_zero _
change (fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i0 : V)) i0 = 0 at hz
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ w p hw (p i0),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← hv, Finsupp.total_apply,
@Finset.sum_insert_zero _ _ l.support i0 _ _ _ hz]
change (∑ i ∈ l.support, l i • _) = _
congr with i
by_cases h : i = i0
· simp [h]
· simp [hwdef, h]
· rw [Set.range_eq_empty, vectorSpan_empty, Submodule.mem_bot]
rintro rfl
use ∅
simp
· rintro ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan hw p
#align mem_vector_span_iff_eq_weighted_vsub mem_vectorSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSub
variable {k}
/-- A point in the `affineSpan` of an indexed family is an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1. See also
`eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype`. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan {p1 : P} {p : ι → P}
(h : p1 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p)) :
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 ∧ p1 = s.affineCombination k p w := by
classical
have hn : (affineSpan k (Set.range p) : Set P).Nonempty := ⟨p1, h⟩
rw [affineSpan_nonempty, Set.range_nonempty_iff_nonempty] at hn
cases' hn with i0
have h0 : p i0 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) := mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_range_self i0)
have hd : p1 -ᵥ p i0 ∈ (affineSpan k (Set.range p)).direction :=
AffineSubspace.vsub_mem_direction h h0
rw [direction_affineSpan, mem_vectorSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSub] at hd
rcases hd with ⟨s, w, h, hs⟩
let s' := insert i0 s
let w' := Set.indicator (↑s) w
have h' : ∑ i ∈ s', w' i = 0 := by
rw [← h, Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_insert i0 s)]
have hs' : s'.weightedVSub p w' = p1 -ᵥ p i0 := by
rw [hs]
exact (Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_insert i0 s)).symm
let w0 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i0 1
have hw0 : ∑ i ∈ s', w0 i = 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)]
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, true_or, not_true, Function.const_apply, Finset.sum_const_zero,
add_zero]
have hw0s : s'.affineCombination k p w0 = p i0 :=
s'.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w0 p (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
(Function.update_same _ _ _) fun _ _ hne => Function.update_noteq hne _ _
refine ⟨s', w0 + w', ?_, ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: proof was `simp [Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, hw0, h']`
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, hw0, h', add_zero]
· rw [add_comm, ← Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, hw0s, hs', vsub_vadd]
#align eq_affine_combination_of_mem_affine_span eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan
theorem eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype [Fintype ι] {p1 : P} {p : ι → P}
(h : p1 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p)) :
∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 1 ∧ p1 = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w := by
classical
obtain ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩ := eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan h
refine
⟨(s : Set ι).indicator w, ?_, Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w p s.subset_univ⟩
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Set.indicator_apply, ← hw]
rw [Fintype.sum_extend_by_zero s w]
#align eq_affine_combination_of_mem_affine_span_of_fintype eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype
variable (k V)
/-- A point is in the `affineSpan` of an indexed family if and only
if it is an `affineCombination` with sum of weights 1, provided the
underlying ring is nontrivial. -/
theorem mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_affineCombination [Nontrivial k] {p1 : P} {p : ι → P} :
p1 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) ↔
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 ∧ p1 = s.affineCombination k p w := by
constructor
· exact eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan
· rintro ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact affineCombination_mem_affineSpan hw p
#align mem_affine_span_iff_eq_affine_combination mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_affineCombination
/-- Given a family of points together with a chosen base point in that family, membership of the
affine span of this family corresponds to an identity in terms of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, with
weights that are not required to sum to 1. -/
theorem mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd [Nontrivial k] (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (q : P) :
q ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) ↔
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), q = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w +ᵥ p j := by
constructor
· intro hq
obtain ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩ := eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan hq
exact ⟨s, w, s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw (p j)⟩
· rintro ⟨s, w, rfl⟩
classical
let w' : ι → k := Function.update w j (1 - (s \ {j}).sum w)
have h₁ : (insert j s).sum w' = 1 := by
by_cases hj : j ∈ s
· simp [Finset.sum_update_of_mem hj, Finset.insert_eq_of_mem hj]
· simp [Finset.sum_insert hj, Finset.sum_update_of_not_mem hj, hj]
have hww : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w i = w' i := by
intro i hij
simp [w', hij]
rw [s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq p j w w' hww, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert w' p j, ←
(insert j s).affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w' p h₁ (p j)]
exact affineCombination_mem_affineSpan h₁ p
#align mem_affine_span_iff_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd
variable {k V}
/-- Given a set of points, together with a chosen base point in this set, if we affinely transport
all other members of the set along the line joining them to this base point, the affine span is
unchanged. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 1,172 | 1,185 | theorem affineSpan_eq_affineSpan_lineMap_units [Nontrivial k] {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s)
(w : s → Units k) :
affineSpan k (Set.range fun q : s => AffineMap.lineMap p ↑q (w q : k)) = affineSpan k s := by |
have : s = Set.range ((↑) : s → P) := by simp
conv_rhs =>
rw [this]
apply le_antisymm
<;> intro q hq
<;> erw [mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd k V _ (⟨p, hp⟩ : s) q] at hq ⊢
<;> obtain ⟨t, μ, rfl⟩ := hq
<;> use t
<;> [use fun x => μ x * ↑(w x); use fun x => μ x * ↑(w x)⁻¹]
<;> simp [smul_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Morenikeji Neri
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Instances
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Colon
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain
#align_import ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6010cf523816335f7bae7f8584cb2edaace73940"
/-!
# Principal ideal rings, principal ideal domains, and Bézout rings
A principal ideal ring (PIR) is a ring in which all left ideals are principal. A
principal ideal domain (PID) is an integral domain which is a principal ideal ring.
# Main definitions
Note that for principal ideal domains, one should use
`[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]`. There is no explicit definition of a PID.
Theorems about PID's are in the `principal_ideal_ring` namespace.
- `IsPrincipalIdealRing`: a predicate on rings, saying that every left ideal is principal.
- `IsBezout`: the predicate saying that every finitely generated left ideal is principal.
- `generator`: a generator of a principal ideal (or more generally submodule)
- `to_unique_factorization_monoid`: a PID is a unique factorization domain
# Main results
- `to_maximal_ideal`: a non-zero prime ideal in a PID is maximal.
- `EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain` : a Euclidean domain is a PID.
- `IsBezout.nonemptyGCDMonoid`: Every Bézout domain is a GCD domain.
-/
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
open Set Function
open Submodule
section
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
instance bot_isPrincipal : (⊥ : Submodule R M).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨0, by simp⟩⟩
#align bot_is_principal bot_isPrincipal
instance top_isPrincipal : (⊤ : Submodule R R).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨1, Ideal.span_singleton_one.symm⟩⟩
#align top_is_principal top_isPrincipal
variable (R)
/-- A Bézout ring is a ring whose finitely generated ideals are principal. -/
class IsBezout : Prop where
/-- Any finitely generated ideal is principal. -/
isPrincipal_of_FG : ∀ I : Ideal R, I.FG → I.IsPrincipal
#align is_bezout IsBezout
instance (priority := 100) IsBezout.of_isPrincipalIdealRing [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] : IsBezout R :=
⟨fun I _ => IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal I⟩
#align is_bezout.of_is_principal_ideal_ring IsBezout.of_isPrincipalIdealRing
instance (priority := 100) DivisionRing.isPrincipalIdealRing (K : Type u) [DivisionRing K] :
IsPrincipalIdealRing K where
principal S := by
rcases Ideal.eq_bot_or_top S with (rfl | rfl)
· apply bot_isPrincipal
· apply top_isPrincipal
#align division_ring.is_principal_ideal_ring DivisionRing.isPrincipalIdealRing
end
namespace Submodule.IsPrincipal
variable [AddCommGroup M]
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Module R M]
/-- `generator I`, if `I` is a principal submodule, is an `x ∈ M` such that `span R {x} = I` -/
noncomputable def generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : M :=
Classical.choose (principal S)
#align submodule.is_principal.generator Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator
theorem span_singleton_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : span R {generator S} = S :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal S))
#align submodule.is_principal.span_singleton_generator Submodule.IsPrincipal.span_singleton_generator
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_generator (I : Ideal R) [I.IsPrincipal] :
Ideal.span ({generator I} : Set R) = I :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal I))
#align ideal.span_singleton_generator Ideal.span_singleton_generator
@[simp]
theorem generator_mem (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : generator S ∈ S := by
conv_rhs => rw [← span_singleton_generator S]
exact subset_span (mem_singleton _)
#align submodule.is_principal.generator_mem Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator_mem
theorem mem_iff_eq_smul_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : M} :
x ∈ S ↔ ∃ s : R, x = s • generator S := by
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ x, ← mem_span_singleton, span_singleton_generator]
#align submodule.is_principal.mem_iff_eq_smul_generator Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_eq_smul_generator
theorem eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] :
S = ⊥ ↔ generator S = 0 := by rw [← @span_singleton_eq_bot R M, span_singleton_generator]
#align submodule.is_principal.eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero Submodule.IsPrincipal.eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [Module R M]
theorem associated_generator_span_self [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [IsDomain R] (r : R) :
Associated (generator <| Ideal.span {r}) r := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton]
exact Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
theorem mem_iff_generator_dvd (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : R} : x ∈ S ↔ generator S ∣ x :=
(mem_iff_eq_smul_generator S).trans (exists_congr fun a => by simp only [mul_comm, smul_eq_mul])
#align submodule.is_principal.mem_iff_generator_dvd Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd
theorem prime_generator_of_isPrime (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] [is_prime : S.IsPrime]
(ne_bot : S ≠ ⊥) : Prime (generator S) :=
⟨fun h => ne_bot ((eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero S).2 h), fun h =>
is_prime.ne_top (S.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem (generator_mem S) h), fun _ _ => by
simpa only [← mem_iff_generator_dvd S] using is_prime.2⟩
#align submodule.is_principal.prime_generator_of_is_prime Submodule.IsPrincipal.prime_generator_of_isPrime
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_map_dvd_of_mem {N : Submodule R M} (ϕ : M →ₗ[R] R) [(N.map ϕ).IsPrincipal] {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ N) : generator (N.map ϕ) ∣ ϕ x := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, Submodule.mem_map]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
#align submodule.is_principal.generator_map_dvd_of_mem Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator_map_dvd_of_mem
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_submoduleImage_dvd_of_mem {N O : Submodule R M} (hNO : N ≤ O) (ϕ : O →ₗ[R] R)
[(ϕ.submoduleImage N).IsPrincipal] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ N) :
generator (ϕ.submoduleImage N) ∣ ϕ ⟨x, hNO hx⟩ := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, LinearMap.mem_submoduleImage_of_le hNO]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
#align submodule.is_principal.generator_submodule_image_dvd_of_mem Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator_submoduleImage_dvd_of_mem
end CommRing
end Submodule.IsPrincipal
namespace IsBezout
section
variable [Ring R]
instance span_pair_isPrincipal [IsBezout R] (x y : R) : (Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal := by
classical exact isPrincipal_of_FG (Ideal.span {x, y}) ⟨{x, y}, by simp⟩
#align is_bezout.span_pair_is_principal IsBezout.span_pair_isPrincipal
variable (x y : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
/-- A choice of gcd of two elements in a Bézout domain.
Note that the choice is usually not unique. -/
noncomputable def gcd : R := Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator (Ideal.span {x, y})
#align is_bezout.gcd IsBezout.gcd
theorem span_gcd : Ideal.span {gcd x y} = Ideal.span {x, y} :=
Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
#align is_bezout.span_gcd IsBezout.span_gcd
end
variable [CommRing R] (x y z : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
theorem gcd_dvd_left : gcd x y ∣ x :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
#align is_bezout.gcd_dvd_left IsBezout.gcd_dvd_left
theorem gcd_dvd_right : gcd x y ∣ y :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
#align is_bezout.gcd_dvd_right IsBezout.gcd_dvd_right
variable {x y z} in
theorem dvd_gcd (hx : z ∣ x) (hy : z ∣ y) : z ∣ gcd x y := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton] at hx hy ⊢
rw [span_gcd, Ideal.span_insert, sup_le_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
#align is_bezout.dvd_gcd IsBezout.dvd_gcd
theorem gcd_eq_sum : ∃ a b : R, a * x + b * y = gcd x y :=
Ideal.mem_span_pair.mp (by rw [← span_gcd]; apply Ideal.subset_span; simp)
#align is_bezout.gcd_eq_sum IsBezout.gcd_eq_sum
variable {x y}
theorem _root_.IsRelPrime.isCoprime (h : IsRelPrime x y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [← Ideal.isCoprime_span_singleton_iff, Ideal.isCoprime_iff_sup_eq, ← Ideal.span_union,
Set.singleton_union, ← span_gcd, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
exact h (gcd_dvd_left x y) (gcd_dvd_right x y)
theorem _root_.isRelPrime_iff_isCoprime : IsRelPrime x y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨IsRelPrime.isCoprime, IsCoprime.isRelPrime⟩
variable (R)
/-- Any Bézout domain is a GCD domain. This is not an instance since `GCDMonoid` contains data,
and this might not be how we would like to construct it. -/
noncomputable def toGCDDomain [IsBezout R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] : GCDMonoid R :=
gcdMonoidOfGCD (gcd · ·) (gcd_dvd_left · ·) (gcd_dvd_right · ·) dvd_gcd
#align is_bezout.to_gcd_domain IsBezout.toGCDDomain
instance nonemptyGCDMonoid [IsBezout R] [IsDomain R] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid R) := by
classical exact ⟨toGCDDomain R⟩
theorem associated_gcd_gcd [IsDomain R] [GCDMonoid R] :
Associated (IsBezout.gcd x y) (GCDMonoid.gcd x y) :=
gcd_greatest_associated (gcd_dvd_left _ _ ) (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (fun _ => dvd_gcd)
end IsBezout
namespace IsPrime
open Submodule.IsPrincipal Ideal
-- TODO -- for a non-ID one could perhaps prove that if p < q are prime then q maximal;
-- 0 isn't prime in a non-ID PIR but the Krull dimension is still <= 1.
-- The below result follows from this, but we could also use the below result to
-- prove this (quotient out by p).
theorem to_maximal_ideal [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] {S : Ideal R}
[hpi : IsPrime S] (hS : S ≠ ⊥) : IsMaximal S :=
isMaximal_iff.2
⟨(ne_top_iff_one S).1 hpi.1, by
intro T x hST hxS hxT
cases' (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 (hST <| generator_mem S) with z hz
cases hpi.mem_or_mem (show generator T * z ∈ S from hz ▸ generator_mem S) with
| inl h =>
have hTS : T ≤ S := by
rwa [← T.span_singleton_generator, Ideal.span_le, singleton_subset_iff]
exact (hxS <| hTS hxT).elim
| inr h =>
cases' (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 h with y hy
have : generator S ≠ 0 := mt (eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero _).2 hS
rw [← mul_one (generator S), hy, mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' this] at hz
exact hz.symm ▸ T.mul_mem_right _ (generator_mem T)⟩
#align is_prime.to_maximal_ideal IsPrime.to_maximal_ideal
end IsPrime
section
open EuclideanDomain
variable [EuclideanDomain R]
theorem mod_mem_iff {S : Ideal R} {x y : R} (hy : y ∈ S) : x % y ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S :=
⟨fun hxy => div_add_mod x y ▸ S.add_mem (S.mul_mem_right _ hy) hxy, fun hx =>
(mod_eq_sub_mul_div x y).symm ▸ S.sub_mem hx (S.mul_mem_right _ hy)⟩
#align mod_mem_iff mod_mem_iff
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain : IsPrincipalIdealRing R where
principal S := by classical exact
⟨if h : { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 }.Nonempty then
have wf : WellFounded (EuclideanDomain.r : R → R → Prop) := EuclideanDomain.r_wellFounded
have hmin : WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ∈ S ∧
WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ≠ 0 :=
WellFounded.min_mem wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h
⟨WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h,
Submodule.ext fun x => ⟨fun hx =>
div_add_mod x (WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h) ▸
(Ideal.mem_span_singleton.2 <| dvd_add (dvd_mul_right _ _) <| by
have : x % WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ∉
{ x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } :=
fun h₁ => WellFounded.not_lt_min wf _ h h₁ (mod_lt x hmin.2)
have : x % WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h = 0 := by
simp only [not_and_or, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_ne_iff] at this
exact this.neg_resolve_left <| (mod_mem_iff hmin.1).2 hx
simp [*]),
fun hx =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := Ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 hx
hy.symm ▸ S.mul_mem_right _ hmin.1⟩⟩
else ⟨0, Submodule.ext fun a => by
rw [← @Submodule.bot_coe R R _ _ _, span_eq, Submodule.mem_bot]
exact ⟨fun haS => by_contra fun ha0 => h ⟨a, ⟨haS, ha0⟩⟩,
fun h₁ => h₁.symm ▸ S.zero_mem⟩⟩⟩
#align euclidean_domain.to_principal_ideal_domain EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain
end
theorem IsField.isPrincipalIdealRing {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (h : IsField R) :
IsPrincipalIdealRing R :=
@EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain R (@Field.toEuclideanDomain R h.toField)
#align is_field.is_principal_ideal_ring IsField.isPrincipalIdealRing
namespace PrincipalIdealRing
open IsPrincipalIdealRing
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) isNoetherianRing [Ring R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing R :=
isNoetherianRing_iff.2
⟨fun s : Ideal R => by
rcases (IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal s).principal with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [← Finset.coe_singleton]
exact ⟨{a}, SetLike.coe_injective rfl⟩⟩
#align principal_ideal_ring.is_noetherian_ring PrincipalIdealRing.isNoetherianRing
theorem isMaximal_of_irreducible [CommRing R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] {p : R}
(hp : Irreducible p) : Ideal.IsMaximal (span R ({p} : Set R)) :=
⟨⟨mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.1 hp.1, fun I hI => by
rcases principal I with ⟨a, rfl⟩
erw [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
rcases Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton.1 (le_of_lt hI) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine (of_irreducible_mul hp).resolve_right (mt (fun hb => ?_) (not_le_of_lt hI))
erw [Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton, IsUnit.mul_right_dvd hb]⟩⟩
#align principal_ideal_ring.is_maximal_of_irreducible PrincipalIdealRing.isMaximal_of_irreducible
@[deprecated] protected alias irreducible_iff_prime := irreducible_iff_prime
#align principal_ideal_ring.irreducible_iff_prime irreducible_iff_prime
@[deprecated] protected alias associates_irreducible_iff_prime := associates_irreducible_iff_prime
#align principal_ideal_ring.associates_irreducible_iff_prime associates_irreducible_iff_prime
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
section
open scoped Classical
/-- `factors a` is a multiset of irreducible elements whose product is `a`, up to units -/
noncomputable def factors (a : R) : Multiset R :=
if h : a = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors a h)
#align principal_ideal_ring.factors PrincipalIdealRing.factors
theorem factors_spec (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) :
(∀ b ∈ factors a, Irreducible b) ∧ Associated (factors a).prod a := by
unfold factors; rw [dif_neg h]
exact Classical.choose_spec (WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors a h)
#align principal_ideal_ring.factors_spec PrincipalIdealRing.factors_spec
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_factors {R : Type v} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
{a b : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ∈ factors a) : b ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero ((factors_spec a ha).1 b hb)
#align principal_ideal_ring.ne_zero_of_mem_factors PrincipalIdealRing.ne_zero_of_mem_factors
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PrincipalIdealDomain.lean | 356 | 360 | theorem mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset (s : Submonoid R) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(hfac : ∀ b ∈ factors a, b ∈ s) (hunit : ∀ c : Rˣ, (c : R) ∈ s) : a ∈ s := by |
rcases (factors_spec a ha).2 with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc]
exact mul_mem (multiset_prod_mem _ hfac) (hunit _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Monad.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Order.Chain
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Order
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
#align_import order.omega_complete_partial_order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
/-!
# Omega Complete Partial Orders
An omega-complete partial order is a partial order with a supremum
operation on increasing sequences indexed by natural numbers (which we
call `ωSup`). In this sense, it is strictly weaker than join complete
semi-lattices as only ω-sized totally ordered sets have a supremum.
The concept of an omega-complete partial order (ωCPO) is useful for the
formalization of the semantics of programming languages. Its notion of
supremum helps define the meaning of recursive procedures.
## Main definitions
* class `OmegaCompletePartialOrder`
* `ite`, `map`, `bind`, `seq` as continuous morphisms
## Instances of `OmegaCompletePartialOrder`
* `Part`
* every `CompleteLattice`
* pi-types
* product types
* `OrderHom`
* `ContinuousHom` (with notation →𝒄)
* an instance of `OmegaCompletePartialOrder (α →𝒄 β)`
* `ContinuousHom.ofFun`
* `ContinuousHom.ofMono`
* continuous functions:
* `id`
* `ite`
* `const`
* `Part.bind`
* `Part.map`
* `Part.seq`
## References
* [Chain-complete posets and directed sets with applications][markowsky1976]
* [Recursive definitions of partial functions and their computations][cadiou1972]
* [Semantics of Programming Languages: Structures and Techniques][gunter1992]
-/
universe u v
-- Porting note: can this really be a good idea?
attribute [-simp] Part.bind_eq_bind Part.map_eq_map
open scoped Classical
namespace OrderHom
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
/-- `Part.bind` as a monotone function -/
@[simps]
def bind {β γ} (f : α →o Part β) (g : α →o β → Part γ) : α →o Part γ where
toFun x := f x >>= g x
monotone' := by
intro x y h a
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, Part.bind_eq_bind, Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_imp]
intro b hb ha
exact ⟨b, f.monotone h _ hb, g.monotone h _ _ ha⟩
#align order_hom.bind OrderHom.bind
#align order_hom.bind_coe OrderHom.bind_coe
end OrderHom
namespace OmegaCompletePartialOrder
/-- A chain is a monotone sequence.
See the definition on page 114 of [gunter1992]. -/
def Chain (α : Type u) [Preorder α] :=
ℕ →o α
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain
namespace Chain
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
instance : FunLike (Chain α) ℕ α := inferInstanceAs <| FunLike (ℕ →o α) ℕ α
instance : OrderHomClass (Chain α) ℕ α := inferInstanceAs <| OrderHomClass (ℕ →o α) ℕ α
instance : CoeFun (Chain α) fun _ => ℕ → α := ⟨DFunLike.coe⟩
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Chain α) :=
⟨⟨default, fun _ _ _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
instance : Membership α (Chain α) :=
⟨fun a (c : ℕ →o α) => ∃ i, a = c i⟩
variable (c c' : Chain α)
variable (f : α →o β)
variable (g : β →o γ)
instance : LE (Chain α) where le x y := ∀ i, ∃ j, x i ≤ y j
lemma isChain_range : IsChain (· ≤ ·) (Set.range c) := Monotone.isChain_range (OrderHomClass.mono c)
lemma directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) c := directedOn_range.2 c.isChain_range.directedOn
/-- `map` function for `Chain` -/
-- Porting note: `simps` doesn't work with type synonyms
-- @[simps! (config := .asFn)]
def map : Chain β :=
f.comp c
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.map OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.map
@[simp] theorem map_coe : ⇑(map c f) = f ∘ c := rfl
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.map_coe OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.map_coe
variable {f}
theorem mem_map (x : α) : x ∈ c → f x ∈ Chain.map c f :=
fun ⟨i, h⟩ => ⟨i, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.mem_map OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.mem_map
theorem exists_of_mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ c.map f → ∃ a, a ∈ c ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨i, h⟩ => ⟨c i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.exists_of_mem_map OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.exists_of_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff {b : β} : b ∈ c.map f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ c ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map _, fun h => by
rcases h with ⟨w, h, h'⟩
subst b
apply mem_map c _ h⟩
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.mem_map_iff OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.mem_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_id : c.map OrderHom.id = c :=
OrderHom.comp_id _
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.map_id OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.map_id
theorem map_comp : (c.map f).map g = c.map (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.map_comp OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.map_comp
@[mono]
theorem map_le_map {g : α →o β} (h : f ≤ g) : c.map f ≤ c.map g :=
fun i => by simp [mem_map_iff]; exists i; apply h
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.map_le_map OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.map_le_map
/-- `OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.zip` pairs up the elements of two chains
that have the same index. -/
-- Porting note: `simps` doesn't work with type synonyms
-- @[simps!]
def zip (c₀ : Chain α) (c₁ : Chain β) : Chain (α × β) :=
OrderHom.prod c₀ c₁
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.zip OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.zip
@[simp] theorem zip_coe (c₀ : Chain α) (c₁ : Chain β) (n : ℕ) : c₀.zip c₁ n = (c₀ n, c₁ n) := rfl
#align omega_complete_partial_order.chain.zip_coe OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.zip_coe
end Chain
end OmegaCompletePartialOrder
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder
-- Porting note: removed "set_option extends_priority 50"
/-- An omega-complete partial order is a partial order with a supremum
operation on increasing sequences indexed by natural numbers (which we
call `ωSup`). In this sense, it is strictly weaker than join complete
semi-lattices as only ω-sized totally ordered sets have a supremum.
See the definition on page 114 of [gunter1992]. -/
class OmegaCompletePartialOrder (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α where
/-- The supremum of an increasing sequence -/
ωSup : Chain α → α
/-- `ωSup` is an upper bound of the increasing sequence -/
le_ωSup : ∀ c : Chain α, ∀ i, c i ≤ ωSup c
/-- `ωSup` is a lower bound of the set of upper bounds of the increasing sequence -/
ωSup_le : ∀ (c : Chain α) (x), (∀ i, c i ≤ x) → ωSup c ≤ x
#align omega_complete_partial_order OmegaCompletePartialOrder
namespace OmegaCompletePartialOrder
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α]
/-- Transfer an `OmegaCompletePartialOrder` on `β` to an `OmegaCompletePartialOrder` on `α`
using a strictly monotone function `f : β →o α`, a definition of ωSup and a proof that `f` is
continuous with regard to the provided `ωSup` and the ωCPO on `α`. -/
protected abbrev lift [PartialOrder β] (f : β →o α) (ωSup₀ : Chain β → β)
(h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y → x ≤ y) (h' : ∀ c, f (ωSup₀ c) = ωSup (c.map f)) :
OmegaCompletePartialOrder β where
ωSup := ωSup₀
ωSup_le c x hx := h _ _ (by rw [h']; apply ωSup_le; intro i; apply f.monotone (hx i))
le_ωSup c i := h _ _ (by rw [h']; apply le_ωSup (c.map f))
#align omega_complete_partial_order.lift OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lift
theorem le_ωSup_of_le {c : Chain α} {x : α} (i : ℕ) (h : x ≤ c i) : x ≤ ωSup c :=
le_trans h (le_ωSup c _)
#align omega_complete_partial_order.le_ωSup_of_le OmegaCompletePartialOrder.le_ωSup_of_le
theorem ωSup_total {c : Chain α} {x : α} (h : ∀ i, c i ≤ x ∨ x ≤ c i) : ωSup c ≤ x ∨ x ≤ ωSup c :=
by_cases
(fun (this : ∀ i, c i ≤ x) => Or.inl (ωSup_le _ _ this))
(fun (this : ¬∀ i, c i ≤ x) =>
have : ∃ i, ¬c i ≤ x := by simp only [not_forall] at this ⊢; assumption
let ⟨i, hx⟩ := this
have : x ≤ c i := (h i).resolve_left hx
Or.inr <| le_ωSup_of_le _ this)
#align omega_complete_partial_order.ωSup_total OmegaCompletePartialOrder.ωSup_total
@[mono]
theorem ωSup_le_ωSup_of_le {c₀ c₁ : Chain α} (h : c₀ ≤ c₁) : ωSup c₀ ≤ ωSup c₁ :=
(ωSup_le _ _) fun i => by
obtain ⟨_, h⟩ := h i
exact le_trans h (le_ωSup _ _)
#align omega_complete_partial_order.ωSup_le_ωSup_of_le OmegaCompletePartialOrder.ωSup_le_ωSup_of_le
theorem ωSup_le_iff (c : Chain α) (x : α) : ωSup c ≤ x ↔ ∀ i, c i ≤ x := by
constructor <;> intros
· trans ωSup c
· exact le_ωSup _ _
· assumption
exact ωSup_le _ _ ‹_›
#align omega_complete_partial_order.ωSup_le_iff OmegaCompletePartialOrder.ωSup_le_iff
lemma isLUB_range_ωSup (c : Chain α) : IsLUB (Set.range c) (ωSup c) := by
constructor
· simp only [upperBounds, Set.mem_range, forall_exists_index, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun a ↦ le_ωSup c a
· simp only [lowerBounds, upperBounds, Set.mem_range, forall_exists_index,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun ⦃a⦄ a_1 ↦ ωSup_le c a a_1
lemma ωSup_eq_of_isLUB {c : Chain α} {a : α} (h : IsLUB (Set.range c) a) : a = ωSup c := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff]
simp only [IsLUB, IsLeast, upperBounds, lowerBounds, Set.mem_range, forall_exists_index,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at h
constructor
· apply h.2
exact fun a ↦ le_ωSup c a
· rw [ωSup_le_iff]
apply h.1
/-- A subset `p : α → Prop` of the type closed under `ωSup` induces an
`OmegaCompletePartialOrder` on the subtype `{a : α // p a}`. -/
def subtype {α : Type*} [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] (p : α → Prop)
(hp : ∀ c : Chain α, (∀ i ∈ c, p i) → p (ωSup c)) : OmegaCompletePartialOrder (Subtype p) :=
OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lift (OrderHom.Subtype.val p)
(fun c => ⟨ωSup _, hp (c.map (OrderHom.Subtype.val p)) fun _ ⟨n, q⟩ => q.symm ▸ (c n).2⟩)
(fun _ _ h => h) (fun _ => rfl)
#align omega_complete_partial_order.subtype OmegaCompletePartialOrder.subtype
section Continuity
open Chain
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder β]
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder γ]
/-- A monotone function `f : α →o β` is continuous if it distributes over ωSup.
In order to distinguish it from the (more commonly used) continuity from topology
(see `Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean`), the present definition is often referred to as
"Scott-continuity" (referring to Dana Scott). It corresponds to continuity
in Scott topological spaces (not defined here). -/
def Continuous (f : α →o β) : Prop :=
∀ c : Chain α, f (ωSup c) = ωSup (c.map f)
#align omega_complete_partial_order.continuous OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous
/-- `Continuous' f` asserts that `f` is both monotone and continuous. -/
def Continuous' (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ hf : Monotone f, Continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align omega_complete_partial_order.continuous' OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous'
lemma isLUB_of_scottContinuous {c : Chain α} {f : α → β} (hf : ScottContinuous f) :
IsLUB (Set.range (Chain.map c ⟨f, (ScottContinuous.monotone hf)⟩)) (f (ωSup c)) := by
simp only [map_coe, OrderHom.coe_mk]
rw [(Set.range_comp f ↑c)]
exact hf (Set.range_nonempty ↑c) (IsChain.directedOn (isChain_range c)) (isLUB_range_ωSup c)
lemma ScottContinuous.continuous' {f : α → β} (hf : ScottContinuous f) : Continuous' f := by
constructor
· intro c
rw [← (ωSup_eq_of_isLUB (isLUB_of_scottContinuous hf))]
simp only [OrderHom.coe_mk]
theorem Continuous'.to_monotone {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous' f) : Monotone f :=
hf.fst
#align omega_complete_partial_order.continuous'.to_monotone OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous'.to_monotone
theorem Continuous.of_bundled (f : α → β) (hf : Monotone f) (hf' : Continuous ⟨f, hf⟩) :
Continuous' f :=
⟨hf, hf'⟩
#align omega_complete_partial_order.continuous.of_bundled OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous.of_bundled
theorem Continuous.of_bundled' (f : α →o β) (hf' : Continuous f) : Continuous' f :=
⟨f.mono, hf'⟩
#align omega_complete_partial_order.continuous.of_bundled' OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous.of_bundled'
theorem Continuous'.to_bundled (f : α → β) (hf : Continuous' f) : Continuous ⟨f, hf.to_monotone⟩ :=
hf.snd
#align omega_complete_partial_order.continuous'.to_bundled OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous'.to_bundled
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem continuous'_coe : ∀ {f : α →o β}, Continuous' f ↔ Continuous f
| ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨fun ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc, fun hc => ⟨hf, hc⟩⟩
#align omega_complete_partial_order.continuous'_coe OmegaCompletePartialOrder.continuous'_coe
variable (f : α →o β) (g : β →o γ)
| Mathlib/Order/OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lean | 325 | 325 | theorem continuous_id : Continuous (@OrderHom.id α _) := by | intro c; rw [c.map_id]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import order.succ_pred.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0111834459f5d7400215223ea95ae38a1265a907"
/-!
# Successor and predecessor
This file defines successor and predecessor orders. `succ a`, the successor of an element `a : α` is
the least element greater than `a`. `pred a` is the greatest element less than `a`. Typical examples
include `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℕ+`, `Fin n`, but also `ENat`, the lexicographic order of a successor/predecessor
order...
## Typeclasses
* `SuccOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible successor function.
* `PredOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function.
* `IsSuccArchimedean`: `SuccOrder` where `succ` iterated to an element gives all the greater
ones.
* `IsPredArchimedean`: `PredOrder` where `pred` iterated to an element gives all the smaller
ones.
## Implementation notes
Maximal elements don't have a sensible successor. Thus the naïve typeclass
```lean
class NaiveSuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] :=
(succ : α → α)
(succ_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b)
(lt_succ_iff : ∀ {a b}, a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b)
```
can't apply to an `OrderTop` because plugging in `a = b = ⊤` into either of `succ_le_iff` and
`lt_succ_iff` yields `⊤ < ⊤` (or more generally `m < m` for a maximal element `m`).
The solution taken here is to remove the implications `≤ → <` and instead require that `a < succ a`
for all non maximal elements (enforced by the combination of `le_succ` and the contrapositive of
`max_of_succ_le`).
The stricter condition of every element having a sensible successor can be obtained through the
combination of `SuccOrder α` and `NoMaxOrder α`.
## TODO
Is `GaloisConnection pred succ` always true? If not, we should introduce
```lean
class SuccPredOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] extends SuccOrder α, PredOrder α :=
(pred_succ_gc : GaloisConnection (pred : α → α) succ)
```
`CovBy` should help here.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- Order equipped with a sensible successor function. -/
@[ext]
class SuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Successor function-/
succ : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `succ`-/
le_succ : ∀ a, a ≤ succ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `succ` and maximal element-/
max_of_succ_le {a} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a
/-- Proof that `succ` satisfies ordering invariants between `LT` and `LE`-/
succ_le_of_lt {a b} : a < b → succ a ≤ b
/-- Proof that `succ` satisfies ordering invariants between `LE` and `LT`-/
le_of_lt_succ {a b} : a < succ b → a ≤ b
#align succ_order SuccOrder
#align succ_order.ext_iff SuccOrder.ext_iff
#align succ_order.ext SuccOrder.ext
/-- Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function. -/
@[ext]
class PredOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Predecessor function-/
pred : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `pred`-/
pred_le : ∀ a, pred a ≤ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `pred` and minimal element-/
min_of_le_pred {a} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a
/-- Proof that `pred` satisfies ordering invariants between `LT` and `LE`-/
le_pred_of_lt {a b} : a < b → a ≤ pred b
/-- Proof that `pred` satisfies ordering invariants between `LE` and `LT`-/
le_of_pred_lt {a b} : pred a < b → a ≤ b
#align pred_order PredOrder
#align pred_order.ext PredOrder.ext
#align pred_order.ext_iff PredOrder.ext_iff
instance [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] :
PredOrder αᵒᵈ where
pred := toDual ∘ SuccOrder.succ ∘ ofDual
pred_le := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
SuccOrder.le_succ, implies_true]
min_of_le_pred h := by apply SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le h
le_pred_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt h
le_of_pred_lt := SuccOrder.le_of_lt_succ
instance [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] :
SuccOrder αᵒᵈ where
succ := toDual ∘ PredOrder.pred ∘ ofDual
le_succ := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
PredOrder.pred_le, implies_true]
max_of_succ_le h := by apply PredOrder.min_of_le_pred h
succ_le_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt h
le_of_lt_succ := PredOrder.le_of_pred_lt
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` usable when `α` has no maximal element. -/
def SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIffOfLeLtSucc (succ : α → α) (hsucc_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b)
(hle_of_lt_succ : ∀ {a b}, a < succ b → a ≤ b) : SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
le_succ := fun _ => (hsucc_le_iff.1 le_rfl).le
max_of_succ_le := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hsucc_le_iff.1 ha).elim
succ_le_of_lt := fun h => hsucc_le_iff.2 h
le_of_lt_succ := fun h => hle_of_lt_succ h}
#align succ_order.of_succ_le_iff_of_le_lt_succ SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIffOfLeLtSucc
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` usable when `α` has no minimal element. -/
def PredOrder.ofLePredIffOfPredLePred (pred : α → α) (hle_pred_iff : ∀ {a b}, a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b)
(hle_of_pred_lt : ∀ {a b}, pred a < b → a ≤ b) : PredOrder α :=
{ pred
pred_le := fun _ => (hle_pred_iff.1 le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hle_pred_iff.1 ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt := fun h => hle_pred_iff.2 h
le_of_pred_lt := fun h => hle_of_pred_lt h }
#align pred_order.of_le_pred_iff_of_pred_le_pred PredOrder.ofLePredIffOfPredLePred
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def SuccOrder.ofCore (succ : α → α) (hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMax a → ∀ b, a < b ↔ succ a ≤ b)
(hm : ∀ a, IsMax a → succ a = a) : SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
succ_le_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm a h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h b).mp
le_succ := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).symm.le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
le_of_lt_succ := fun {a b} hab =>
by_cases (fun h => hm b h ▸ hab.le) fun h => by simpa [hab] using (hn h a).not
max_of_succ_le := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
#align succ_order.of_core SuccOrder.ofCore
#align succ_order.of_core_succ SuccOrder.ofCore_succ
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def PredOrder.ofCore {α} [LinearOrder α] (pred : α → α)
(hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMin a → ∀ b, b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a) (hm : ∀ a, IsMin a → pred a = a) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
le_pred_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm b h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h a).mpr
pred_le := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
le_of_pred_lt := fun {a b} hab =>
by_cases (fun h => hm a h ▸ hab.le) fun h => by simpa [hab] using (hn h b).not
min_of_le_pred := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
#align pred_order.of_core PredOrder.ofCore
#align pred_order.of_core_pred PredOrder.ofCore_pred
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` usable when `α` is a linear order with no maximal element. -/
def SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (succ : α → α) (hsucc_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b) :
SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
le_succ := fun _ => (hsucc_le_iff.1 le_rfl).le
max_of_succ_le := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hsucc_le_iff.1 ha).elim
succ_le_of_lt := fun h => hsucc_le_iff.2 h
le_of_lt_succ := fun {_ _} h => le_of_not_lt ((not_congr hsucc_le_iff).1 h.not_le) }
#align succ_order.of_succ_le_iff SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` usable when `α` is a linear order with no minimal element. -/
def PredOrder.ofLePredIff (pred : α → α) (hle_pred_iff : ∀ {a b}, a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
pred_le := fun _ => (hle_pred_iff.1 le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hle_pred_iff.1 ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt := fun h => hle_pred_iff.2 h
le_of_pred_lt := fun {_ _} h => le_of_not_lt ((not_congr hle_pred_iff).1 h.not_le) }
#align pred_order.of_le_pred_iff PredOrder.ofLePredIff
open scoped Classical
variable (α)
/-- A well-order is a `SuccOrder`. -/
noncomputable def SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT α] : SuccOrder α :=
ofCore (fun a ↦ if h : (Ioi a).Nonempty then wellFounded_lt.min _ h else a)
(fun ha _ ↦ by
rw [not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp_rw [Set.Nonempty, mem_Ioi, dif_pos ha]
exact ⟨(wellFounded_lt.min_le · ha), lt_of_lt_of_le (wellFounded_lt.min_mem _ ha)⟩)
fun a ha ↦ dif_neg (not_not_intro ha <| not_isMax_iff.mpr ·)
/-- A linear order with well-founded greater-than relation is a `PredOrder`. -/
noncomputable def PredOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedGT (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedGT α] :
PredOrder α := letI := SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT αᵒᵈ; inferInstanceAs (PredOrder αᵒᵈᵒᵈ)
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Successor order -/
namespace Order
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The successor of an element. If `a` is not maximal, then `succ a` is the least element greater
than `a`. If `a` is maximal, then `succ a = a`. -/
def succ : α → α :=
SuccOrder.succ
#align order.succ Order.succ
theorem le_succ : ∀ a : α, a ≤ succ a :=
SuccOrder.le_succ
#align order.le_succ Order.le_succ
theorem max_of_succ_le {a : α} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a :=
SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le
#align order.max_of_succ_le Order.max_of_succ_le
theorem succ_le_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → succ a ≤ b :=
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt
#align order.succ_le_of_lt Order.succ_le_of_lt
theorem le_of_lt_succ {a b : α} : a < succ b → a ≤ b :=
SuccOrder.le_of_lt_succ
#align order.le_of_lt_succ Order.le_of_lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff_isMax : succ a ≤ a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨max_of_succ_le, fun h => h <| le_succ _⟩
#align order.succ_le_iff_is_max Order.succ_le_iff_isMax
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff_not_isMax : a < succ a ↔ ¬IsMax a :=
⟨not_isMax_of_lt, fun ha => (le_succ a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| max_of_succ_le h⟩
#align order.lt_succ_iff_not_is_max Order.lt_succ_iff_not_isMax
alias ⟨_, lt_succ_of_not_isMax⟩ := lt_succ_iff_not_isMax
#align order.lt_succ_of_not_is_max Order.lt_succ_of_not_isMax
theorem wcovBy_succ (a : α) : a ⩿ succ a :=
⟨le_succ a, fun _ hb => (succ_le_of_lt hb).not_lt⟩
#align order.wcovby_succ Order.wcovBy_succ
theorem covBy_succ_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : a ⋖ succ a :=
(wcovBy_succ a).covBy_of_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax h
#align order.covby_succ_of_not_is_max Order.covBy_succ_of_not_isMax
theorem lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_lt_succ, fun h => h.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha⟩
#align order.lt_succ_iff_of_not_is_max Order.lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax
theorem succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨(lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha).trans_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
#align order.succ_le_iff_of_not_is_max Order.succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax
lemma succ_lt_succ_of_not_isMax (h : a < b) (hb : ¬ IsMax b) : succ a < succ b :=
(lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb).2 <| succ_le_of_lt h
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha]
#align order.succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_is_max Order.succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax
theorem succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb]
#align order.succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_is_max Order.succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax
@[simp, mono]
theorem succ_le_succ (h : a ≤ b) : succ a ≤ succ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· by_cases hba : b ≤ a
· exact (hb <| hba.trans <| le_succ _).trans (le_succ _)
· exact succ_le_of_lt ((h.lt_of_not_le hba).trans_le <| le_succ b)
· rwa [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax fun ha => hb <| ha.mono h, lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb]
#align order.succ_le_succ Order.succ_le_succ
theorem succ_mono : Monotone (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_le_succ
#align order.succ_mono Order.succ_mono
theorem le_succ_iterate (k : ℕ) (x : α) : x ≤ succ^[k] x := by
conv_lhs => rw [(by simp only [Function.iterate_id, id] : x = id^[k] x)]
exact Monotone.le_iterate_of_le succ_mono le_succ k x
#align order.le_succ_iterate Order.le_succ_iterate
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
refine max_of_succ_le (le_trans ?_ h_eq.symm.le)
have : succ (succ^[n] a) = succ^[n + 1] a := by rw [Function.iterate_succ', comp]
rw [this]
have h_le : n + 1 ≤ m := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h_lt
exact Monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ a) h_le
#align order.is_max_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt Order.isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
rcases le_total n m with h | h
· exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne)
· rw [h_eq]
exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq.symm (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne.symm)
#align order.is_max_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne Order.isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne
theorem Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Set.ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha
#align order.Iio_succ_of_not_is_max Order.Iio_succ_of_not_isMax
theorem Ici_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Set.ext fun _ => succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha
#align order.Ici_succ_of_not_is_max Order.Ici_succ_of_not_isMax
theorem Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ici_inter_Iic]
#align order.Ico_succ_right_of_not_is_max Order.Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax
theorem Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align order.Ioo_succ_right_of_not_is_max Order.Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax
theorem Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align order.Icc_succ_left_of_not_is_max Order.Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax
theorem Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align order.Ico_succ_left_of_not_is_max Order.Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem lt_succ (a : α) : a < succ a :=
lt_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
#align order.lt_succ Order.lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax b
#align order.lt_succ_iff Order.lt_succ_iff
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
#align order.succ_le_iff Order.succ_le_iff
theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp
#align order.succ_le_succ_iff Order.succ_le_succ_iff
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by simp
#align order.succ_lt_succ_iff Order.succ_lt_succ_iff
alias ⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, _⟩ := succ_le_succ_iff
#align order.le_of_succ_le_succ Order.le_of_succ_le_succ
alias ⟨lt_of_succ_lt_succ, succ_lt_succ⟩ := succ_lt_succ_iff
#align order.lt_of_succ_lt_succ Order.lt_of_succ_lt_succ
#align order.succ_lt_succ Order.succ_lt_succ
theorem succ_strictMono : StrictMono (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_lt_succ
#align order.succ_strict_mono Order.succ_strictMono
theorem covBy_succ (a : α) : a ⋖ succ a :=
covBy_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
#align order.covby_succ Order.covBy_succ
@[simp]
theorem Iio_succ (a : α) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Iio_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
#align order.Iio_succ Order.Iio_succ
@[simp]
theorem Ici_succ (a : α) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Ici_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
#align order.Ici_succ Order.Ici_succ
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b :=
Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
#align order.Ico_succ_right Order.Ico_succ_right
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b :=
Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
#align order.Ioo_succ_right Order.Ioo_succ_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_succ_left (a b : α) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b :=
Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
#align order.Icc_succ_left Order.Icc_succ_left
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_left (a b : α) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b :=
Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
#align order.Ico_succ_left Order.Ico_succ_left
end NoMaxOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_iff_isMax : succ a = a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨fun h => max_of_succ_le h.le, fun h => h.eq_of_ge <| le_succ _⟩
#align order.succ_eq_iff_is_max Order.succ_eq_iff_isMax
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.succ_eq⟩ := succ_eq_iff_isMax
#align is_max.succ_eq IsMax.succ_eq
theorem succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a = succ b ↔ a = b := by
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, eq_iff_le_not_lt, succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb,
succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb]
#align order.succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_is_max Order.succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax
theorem le_le_succ_iff : a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ succ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = succ a := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hba : b ≠ a =>
h.2.antisymm (succ_le_of_lt <| h.1.lt_of_ne <| hba.symm),
?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, le_succ b⟩
· exact ⟨le_succ a, le_rfl⟩
#align order.le_le_succ_iff Order.le_le_succ_iff
theorem _root_.CovBy.succ_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : succ a = b :=
(succ_le_of_lt h.lt).eq_of_not_lt fun h' => h.2 (lt_succ_of_not_isMax h.lt.not_isMax) h'
#align covby.succ_eq CovBy.succ_eq
theorem _root_.WCovBy.le_succ (h : a ⩿ b) : b ≤ succ a := by
obtain h | rfl := h.covBy_or_eq
· exact (CovBy.succ_eq h).ge
· exact le_succ _
#align wcovby.le_succ WCovBy.le_succ
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean | 458 | 461 | theorem le_succ_iff_eq_or_le : a ≤ succ b ↔ a = succ b ∨ a ≤ b := by |
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· rw [hb.succ_eq, or_iff_right_of_imp le_of_eq]
· rw [← lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import data.set.intervals.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder `α`, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open, or
closed) using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side. For instance,
`Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
This file contains these definitions, and basic facts on inclusion, intersection, difference of
intervals (where the precise statements may depend on the properties of the order, in particular
for some statements it should be `LinearOrder` or `DenselyOrdered`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
/-- Left-open right-open interval -/
def Ioo (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ioo Set.Ioo
/-- Left-closed right-open interval -/
def Ico (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ico Set.Ico
/-- Left-infinite right-open interval -/
def Iio (a : α) :=
{ x | x < a }
#align set.Iio Set.Iio
/-- Left-closed right-closed interval -/
def Icc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Icc Set.Icc
/-- Left-infinite right-closed interval -/
def Iic (b : α) :=
{ x | x ≤ b }
#align set.Iic Set.Iic
/-- Left-open right-closed interval -/
def Ioc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Ioc Set.Ioc
/-- Left-closed right-infinite interval -/
def Ici (a : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x }
#align set.Ici Set.Ici
/-- Left-open right-infinite interval -/
def Ioi (a : α) :=
{ x | a < x }
#align set.Ioi Set.Ioi
theorem Ioo_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x < b } = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioo_def Set.Ioo_def
theorem Ico_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b } = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ico_def Set.Ico_def
theorem Iio_def (a : α) : { x | x < a } = Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.Iio_def Set.Iio_def
theorem Icc_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b } = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Icc_def Set.Icc_def
theorem Iic_def (b : α) : { x | x ≤ b } = Iic b :=
rfl
#align set.Iic_def Set.Iic_def
theorem Ioc_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b } = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioc_def Set.Ioc_def
theorem Ici_def (a : α) : { x | a ≤ x } = Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_def Set.Ici_def
theorem Ioi_def (a : α) : { x | a < x } = Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_def Set.Ioi_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioo Set.mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ico Set.mem_Ico
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iio Set.mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Icc Set.mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iic Set.mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioc Set.mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ici Set.mem_Ici
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioi Set.mem_Ioi
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioo Set.decidableMemIoo
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ico Set.decidableMemIco
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iio Set.decidableMemIio
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Icc Set.decidableMemIcc
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iic Set.decidableMemIic
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioc Set.decidableMemIoc
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ici Set.decidableMemIci
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioi Set.decidableMemIoi
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioo Set.left_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Ico Set.left_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Icc Set.left_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioc Set.left_mem_Ioc
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
#align set.left_mem_Ici Set.left_mem_Ici
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioo Set.right_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ico Set.right_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Icc Set.right_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioc Set.right_mem_Ioc
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
#align set.right_mem_Iic Set.right_mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ici : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ici Set.dual_Ici
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iic : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iic Set.dual_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioi : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ioi Set.dual_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iio : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iio Set.dual_Iio
@[simp]
theorem dual_Icc : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Icc Set.dual_Icc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioc : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioc Set.dual_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ico : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ico Set.dual_Ico
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioo : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioo Set.dual_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Icc Set.nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ico Set.nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioc Set.nonempty_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ici Set.nonempty_Ici
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
#align set.nonempty_Iic Set.nonempty_Iic
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioo Set.nonempty_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
#align set.nonempty_Ioi Set.nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
#align set.nonempty_Iio Set.nonempty_Iio
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Icc_subtype Set.nonempty_Icc_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ico_subtype Set.nonempty_Ico_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
#align set.nonempty_Ici_subtype Set.nonempty_Ici_subtype
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
#align set.nonempty_Iic_subtype Set.nonempty_Iic_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
#align set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
#align set.nonempty_Iio_subtype Set.nonempty_Iio_subtype
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Icc_eq_empty Set.Icc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
#align set.Ico_eq_empty Set.Ico_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty Set.Ioc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty Set.Ioo_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt Set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ico_self Set.Ico_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioc_self Set.Ioc_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioo_self Set.Ioo_self
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ici Set.Ici_subset_Ici
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align set.Iic_subset_Iic Set.Iic_subset_Iic
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ioi Set.Ici_subset_Ioi
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
#align set.Iic_subset_Iio Set.Iic_subset_Iio
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico Set.Ico_subset_Ico
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_left Set.Ico_subset_Ico_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_right Set.Ico_subset_Ico_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc Set.Icc_subset_Icc
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_left Set.Icc_subset_Icc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_right Set.Icc_subset_Icc_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo Set.Icc_subset_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_self Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_self Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
#align set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_right Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ico_subset_Icc_self Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ico_subset_Iio_self Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic_self Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ico_subset_Ici_self Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
#align set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self Set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioi Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici Set.Ioi_subset_Ici
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
#align set.Iio_subset_Iio Set.Iio_subset_Iio
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic Set.Iio_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iic Set.Ici_inter_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iio Set.Ici_inter_Iio
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iic Set.Ioi_inter_Iic
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iio Set.Ioi_inter_Iio
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ici Set.Iic_inter_Ici
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ici Set.Iio_inter_Ici
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioi Set.Iic_inter_Ioi
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ioi Set.Iio_inter_Ioi
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
#align set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
#align set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ico Set.mem_Icc_of_Ico
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
#align set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi Set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
#align set.mem_Iic_of_Iio Set.mem_Iic_of_Iio
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_iff Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_iff Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_top.Iic_eq IsTop.Iic_eq
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_bot.Ici_eq IsBot.Ici_eq
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ioi a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_max.Ioi_eq IsMax.Ioi_eq
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iio a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_min.Iio_eq IsMin.Iio_eq
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le Set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt Set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Ioi_self Set.not_mem_Ioi_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Iio_self Set.not_mem_Iio_self
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align set.Icc_self Set.Icc_self
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
#align set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
#align set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge Set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [ge_iff_le, gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
#align set.Icc_diff_left Set.Icc_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
#align set.Icc_diff_right Set.Icc_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
#align set.Ico_diff_left Set.Ico_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
#align set.Ioc_diff_right Set.Ioc_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
#align set.Icc_diff_both Set.Icc_diff_both
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
#align set.Ici_diff_left Set.Ici_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
#align set.Iic_diff_right Set.Iic_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
#align set.Ico_diff_Ioo_same Set.Ico_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
#align set.Ioc_diff_Ioo_same Set.Ioc_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ico_same Set.Icc_diff_Ico_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ioc_same Set.Icc_diff_Ioc_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ioo_same Set.Icc_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ioi_same Set.Ici_diff_Ioi_same
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iio_same Set.Iic_diff_Iio_same
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
#align set.Ioi_union_left Set.Ioi_union_left
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
#align set.Iio_union_right Set.Iio_union_right
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
#align set.Ioo_union_left Set.Ioo_union_left
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioo, dual_Ico] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
#align set.Ioo_union_right Set.Ioo_union_right
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
#align set.Ioc_union_left Set.Ioc_union_left
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioc, dual_Icc] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
#align set.Ico_union_right Set.Ico_union_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
#align set.Ico_insert_right Set.Ico_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
#align set.Ioc_insert_left Set.Ioc_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
#align set.Ioo_insert_left Set.Ioo_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
#align set.Ioo_insert_right Set.Ioo_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
#align set.Iio_insert Set.Iio_insert
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
#align set.Ioi_insert Set.Ioi_insert
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
#align set.mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
#align set.mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
#align set.mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
#align set.eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico Set.eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
#align set.eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc Set.eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
#align set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
#align is_max.Ici_eq IsMax.Ici_eq
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
#align is_min.Iic_eq IsMin.Iic_eq
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Ici_injective Set.Ici_injective
theorem Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Iic_injective Set.Iic_injective
theorem Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b :=
Ici_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Ici_inj Set.Ici_inj
theorem Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b :=
Iic_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Iic_inj Set.Iic_inj
end PartialOrder
section OrderTop
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} :=
isMax_top.Ici_eq
#align set.Ici_top Set.Ici_top
variable [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_top : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ :=
isMax_top.Ioi_eq
#align set.Ioi_top Set.Ioi_top
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ :=
isTop_top.Iic_eq
#align set.Iic_top Set.Iic_top
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top : Icc a ⊤ = Ici a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Icc_top Set.Icc_top
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top : Ioc a ⊤ = Ioi a := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ioc_top Set.Ioc_top
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} :=
isMin_bot.Iic_eq
#align set.Iic_bot Set.Iic_bot
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem Iio_bot : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ :=
isMin_bot.Iio_eq
#align set.Iio_bot Set.Iio_bot
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ :=
isBot_bot.Ici_eq
#align set.Ici_bot Set.Ici_bot
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot : Icc ⊥ a = Iic a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Icc_bot Set.Icc_bot
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot : Ico ⊥ a = Iio a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ico_bot Set.Ico_bot
end OrderBot
theorem Icc_bot_top [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] : Icc (⊥ : α) ⊤ = univ := by simp
#align set.Icc_bot_top Set.Icc_bot_top
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c d : α}
theorem not_mem_Ici : c ∉ Ici a ↔ c < a :=
not_le
#align set.not_mem_Ici Set.not_mem_Ici
theorem not_mem_Iic : c ∉ Iic b ↔ b < c :=
not_le
#align set.not_mem_Iic Set.not_mem_Iic
theorem not_mem_Ioi : c ∉ Ioi a ↔ c ≤ a :=
not_lt
#align set.not_mem_Ioi Set.not_mem_Ioi
theorem not_mem_Iio : c ∉ Iio b ↔ b ≤ c :=
not_lt
#align set.not_mem_Iio Set.not_mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem compl_Iic : (Iic a)ᶜ = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => not_le
#align set.compl_Iic Set.compl_Iic
@[simp]
theorem compl_Ici : (Ici a)ᶜ = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => not_le
#align set.compl_Ici Set.compl_Ici
@[simp]
theorem compl_Iio : (Iio a)ᶜ = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => not_lt
#align set.compl_Iio Set.compl_Iio
@[simp]
theorem compl_Ioi : (Ioi a)ᶜ = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => not_lt
#align set.compl_Ioi Set.compl_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ici : Ici a \ Ici b = Ico a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ici, Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ici Set.Ici_diff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi : Ici a \ Ioi b = Icc a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ioi, Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ioi Set.Ici_diff_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_diff_Ioi : Ioi a \ Ioi b = Ioc a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ioi, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ioi_diff_Ioi Set.Ioi_diff_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_diff_Ici : Ioi a \ Ici b = Ioo a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ici, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ioi_diff_Ici Set.Ioi_diff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iic : Iic b \ Iic a = Ioc a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iic, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iic Set.Iic_diff_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iio_diff_Iic : Iio b \ Iic a = Ioo a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iic, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.Iio_diff_Iic Set.Iio_diff_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio : Iic b \ Iio a = Icc a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iio, inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iio Set.Iic_diff_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iio_diff_Iio : Iio b \ Iio a = Ico a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iio, inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.Iio_diff_Iio Set.Iio_diff_Iio
theorem Ioi_injective : Injective (Ioi : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_gt_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Ioi_injective Set.Ioi_injective
theorem Iio_injective : Injective (Iio : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_lt_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Iio_injective Set.Iio_injective
theorem Ioi_inj : Ioi a = Ioi b ↔ a = b :=
Ioi_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Ioi_inj Set.Ioi_inj
theorem Iio_inj : Iio a = Iio b ↔ a = b :=
Iio_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Iio_inj Set.Iio_inj
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
have : a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ a₁ < b₂ := h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩
⟨this.1, le_of_not_lt fun h' => lt_irrefl b₂ (h ⟨this.2.le, h'⟩).2⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Ico_subset_Ico h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff Set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ ∧ a₂ ≤ a₁ := by
convert @Ico_subset_Ico_iff αᵒᵈ _ b₁ b₂ a₁ a₂ h₁ using 2 <;> exact (@dual_Ico α _ _ _).symm
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff [DenselyOrdered α] (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) :
Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases exists_between h₁ with ⟨x, xa, xb⟩
constructor <;> refine le_of_not_lt fun h' => ?_
· have ab := (h ⟨xa, xb⟩).1.trans xb
exact lt_irrefl _ (h ⟨h', ab⟩).1
· have ab := xa.trans (h ⟨xa, xb⟩).2
exact lt_irrefl _ (h ⟨ab, h'⟩).2,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Ioo_subset_Ioo h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Ico_eq_Ico_iff (h : a₁ < b₁ ∨ a₂ < b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ = Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ :=
⟨fun e => by
simp only [Subset.antisymm_iff] at e
simp only [le_antisymm_iff]
cases' h with h h <;>
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_lt, ge_iff_le, Ico_subset_Ico_iff h] at e <;>
[ rcases e with ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, e'⟩; rcases e with ⟨e', ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩ ] <;>
-- Porting note: restore `tauto`
have hab := (Ico_subset_Ico_iff <| h₁.trans_lt <| h.trans_le h₂).1 e' <;>
[ exact ⟨⟨hab.left, h₁⟩, ⟨h₂, hab.right⟩⟩; exact ⟨⟨h₁, hab.left⟩, ⟨hab.right, h₂⟩⟩ ],
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by rw [h₁, h₂]⟩
#align set.Ico_eq_Ico_iff Set.Ico_eq_Ico_iff
lemma Ici_eq_singleton_iff_isTop {x : α} : (Ici x = {x}) ↔ IsTop x := by
refine ⟨fun h y ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by ext y; simp [(h y).ge_iff_eq]⟩
by_contra! H
have : y ∈ Ici x := H.le
rw [h, mem_singleton_iff] at this
exact lt_irrefl y (this.le.trans_lt H)
open scoped Classical
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a ↔ a ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Ioi_subset_Ioi h⟩
by_contra ba
exact lt_irrefl _ (h (not_le.mp ba))
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a ↔ a ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Ioi_subset_Ici h⟩
by_contra ba
obtain ⟨c, bc, ca⟩ : ∃ c, b < c ∧ c < a := exists_between (not_le.mp ba)
exact lt_irrefl _ (ca.trans_le (h bc))
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici_iff Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_iff
@[simp]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio_iff : Iio a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Iio_subset_Iio h⟩
by_contra ab
exact lt_irrefl _ (h (not_le.mp ab))
#align set.Iio_subset_Iio_iff Set.Iio_subset_Iio_iff
@[simp]
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Iio a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← diff_eq_empty, Iio_diff_Iic, Ioo_eq_empty_iff, not_lt]
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic_iff Set.Iio_subset_Iic_iff
/-! ### Unions of adjacent intervals -/
/-! #### Two infinite intervals -/
theorem Iic_union_Ioi_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : Iic b ∪ Ioi a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.lt_or_le x).symm
#align set.Iic_union_Ioi_of_le Set.Iic_union_Ioi_of_le
theorem Iio_union_Ici_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : Iio b ∪ Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.le_or_lt x).symm
#align set.Iio_union_Ici_of_le Set.Iio_union_Ici_of_le
theorem Iic_union_Ici_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : Iic b ∪ Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.le_or_le x).symm
#align set.Iic_union_Ici_of_le Set.Iic_union_Ici_of_le
theorem Iio_union_Ioi_of_lt (h : a < b) : Iio b ∪ Ioi a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.lt_or_lt x).symm
#align set.Iio_union_Ioi_of_lt Set.Iio_union_Ioi_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Iic_union_Ici : Iic a ∪ Ici a = univ :=
Iic_union_Ici_of_le le_rfl
#align set.Iic_union_Ici Set.Iic_union_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iio_union_Ici : Iio a ∪ Ici a = univ :=
Iio_union_Ici_of_le le_rfl
#align set.Iio_union_Ici Set.Iio_union_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_union_Ioi : Iic a ∪ Ioi a = univ :=
Iic_union_Ioi_of_le le_rfl
#align set.Iic_union_Ioi Set.Iic_union_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Iio_union_Ioi : Iio a ∪ Ioi a = {a}ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => lt_or_lt_iff_ne
#align set.Iio_union_Ioi Set.Iio_union_Ioi
/-! #### A finite and an infinite interval -/
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 1,284 | 1,290 | theorem Ioo_union_Ioi' (h₁ : c < b) : Ioo a b ∪ Ioi c = Ioi (min a c) := by |
ext1 x
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_Ioo, mem_Ioi, min_lt_iff]
by_cases hc : c < x
· simp only [hc, or_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
· have hxb : x < b := (le_of_not_gt hc).trans_lt h₁
simp only [hxb, and_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e7f0ddbf65bd7181a85edb74b64bdc35ba4bdc74"
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
assert_not_exists Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
#align ideal.map Ideal.map
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
#align ideal.comap Ideal.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
#align ideal.map_mono Ideal.map_mono
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
#align ideal.mem_map_of_mem Ideal.mem_map_of_mem
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
#align ideal.apply_coe_mem_map Ideal.apply_coe_mem_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
#align ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.mem_comap Ideal.mem_comap
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
#align ideal.comap_mono Ideal.comap_mono
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
#align ideal.comap_ne_top Ideal.comap_ne_top
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R] [rcg : RingHomClass G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : Ideal R) (hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
#align ideal.map_le_comap_of_inv_on Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inv_on
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g := fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
#align ideal.comap_le_map_of_inv_on Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inv_on
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal R) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
#align ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
#align ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
#align ideal.is_prime.comap Ideal.IsPrime.comap
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
#align ideal.map_top Ideal.map_top
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align ideal.gc_map_comap Ideal.gc_map_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
#align ideal.comap_id Ideal.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
#align ideal.map_id Ideal.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align ideal.comap_comap Ideal.comap_comap
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
#align ideal.map_map Ideal.map_map
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
#align ideal.map_span Ideal.map_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
#align ideal.map_le_of_le_comap Ideal.map_le_of_le_comap
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
#align ideal.le_comap_of_map_le Ideal.le_comap_of_map_le
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align ideal.le_comap_map Ideal.le_comap_map
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align ideal.map_comap_le Ideal.map_comap_le
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align ideal.comap_top Ideal.comap_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
#align ideal.comap_eq_top_iff Ideal.comap_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align ideal.map_bot Ideal.map_bot
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
#align ideal.map_comap_map Ideal.map_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
#align ideal.comap_map_comap Ideal.comap_map_comap
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
#align ideal.map_sup Ideal.map_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
#align ideal.comap_inf Ideal.comap_inf
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
#align ideal.map_supr Ideal.map_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
#align ideal.comap_infi Ideal.comap_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
#align ideal.map_Sup Ideal.map_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
#align ideal.comap_Inf Ideal.comap_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
#align ideal.comap_Inf' Ideal.comap_sInf'
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
⟨comap_ne_top f H.ne_top, fun {x y} h => H.mem_or_mem <| by rwa [mem_comap, map_mul] at h⟩
#align ideal.comap_is_prime Ideal.comap_isPrime
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
#align ideal.map_inf_le Ideal.map_inf_le
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
#align ideal.le_comap_sup Ideal.le_comap_sup
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact (_root_.map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _)
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
#align ideal.smul_top_eq_map Ideal.smul_top_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
#align ideal.coe_restrict_scalars Ideal.coe_restrictScalars
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I J : Ideal S) : (I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ hx =>
Submodule.mul_induction_on hx (fun _ hx _ hy => Submodule.mul_mem_mul hx hy) fun _ _ =>
Submodule.add_mem _)
(Submodule.mul_le.mpr fun _ hx _ hy => Ideal.mul_mem_mul hx hy)
#align ideal.restrict_scalars_mul Ideal.restrictScalars_mul
section Surjective
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
#align ideal.map_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_comap_of_surjective
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
#align ideal.gi_map_comap Ideal.giMapComap
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
#align ideal.map_surjective_of_surjective Ideal.map_surjective_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
#align ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective Ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
#align ideal.map_sup_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_sup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
#align ideal.map_supr_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_iSup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
#align ideal.map_inf_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_inf_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
#align ideal.map_infi_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_iInf_comap_of_surjective
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction H (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
#align ideal.mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective Ideal.mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
#align ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective Ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
#align ideal.le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective Ideal.le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
#align ideal.map_eq_submodule_map Ideal.map_eq_submodule_map
end Surjective
section Injective
variable (hf : Function.Injective f)
theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
#align ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective
theorem comap_bot_of_injective : Ideal.comap f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp (Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf)
#align ideal.comap_bot_of_injective Ideal.comap_bot_of_injective
end Injective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm (map f I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_of_equiv (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_map,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
#align ideal.map_of_equiv Ideal.map_of_equiv
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`,
then `comap f (comap f.symm I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_of_equiv (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, comap_comap,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, comap_id]
#align ideal.comap_of_equiv Ideal.comap_of_equiv
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
theorem map_comap_of_equiv (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.left_inv' _))
(Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.right_inv' _))
#align ideal.map_comap_of_equiv Ideal.map_comap_of_equiv
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `comap f.symm I = map f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.comap f.symm = I.map f :=
(map_comap_of_equiv I f).symm
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm I = comap f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_symm (I : Ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map f.symm = I.comap f :=
map_comap_of_equiv I (RingEquiv.symm f)
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
section Surjective
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (I : Ideal R) : comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm
(fun r h =>
let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h
Submodule.mem_sup.2
⟨s, hsi, r - s, (Submodule.mem_bot S).2 <| by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
#align ideal.comap_map_of_surjective Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def relIsoOfSurjective : Ideal S ≃o { p : Ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } where
toFun J := ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩
invFun I := map f I.1
left_inv J := map_comap_of_surjective f hf J
right_inv I :=
Subtype.eq <|
show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1 from
(comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left
map_rel_iff' {I1 I2} :=
⟨fun H => map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸ map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H,
comap_mono⟩
#align ideal.rel_iso_of_surjective Ideal.relIsoOfSurjective
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def orderEmbeddingOfSurjective : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R :=
(relIsoOfSurjective f hf).toRelEmbedding.trans (Subtype.relEmbedding (fun x y => x ≤ y) _)
#align ideal.order_embedding_of_surjective Ideal.orderEmbeddingOfSurjective
theorem map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} (H : IsMaximal I) :
map f I = ⊤ ∨ IsMaximal (map f I) := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun ne_top => ⟨⟨fun h => ne_top h, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
· refine
(relIsoOfSurjective f hf).injective
(Subtype.ext_iff.2 (Eq.trans (H.1.2 (comap f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne ?_ ?_)) comap_top.symm))
· exact map_le_iff_le_comap.1 (le_of_lt hJ)
· exact fun h => hJ.right (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf (le_of_eq h.symm))
#align ideal.map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective Ideal.map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective
theorem comap_isMaximal_of_surjective {K : Ideal S} [H : IsMaximal K] : IsMaximal (comap f K) := by
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
suffices map f J = ⊤ by
have := congr_arg (comap f) this
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this
rw [eq_top_iff]
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)))
refine
H.1.2 (map f J)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ)) fun h =>
ne_of_lt hJ (_root_.trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) ?_))
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left]
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
#align ideal.comap_is_maximal_of_surjective Ideal.comap_isMaximal_of_surjective
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨fun h => (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h), fun h =>
le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
#align ideal.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective Ideal.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective
end Surjective
section Bijective
variable (hf : Function.Bijective f)
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def relIsoOfBijective : Ideal S ≃o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
invFun := map f
left_inv := (relIsoOfSurjective f hf.right).left_inv
right_inv J :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1
((relIsoOfSurjective f hf.right).right_inv ⟨J, comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf.left⟩)
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := (relIsoOfSurjective f hf.right).map_rel_iff'
#align ideal.rel_iso_of_bijective Ideal.relIsoOfBijective
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map {I : Ideal R} {K : Ideal S} : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨fun h => le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h, fun h =>
(relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I ▸ comap_mono h⟩
#align ideal.comap_le_iff_le_map Ideal.comap_le_iff_le_map
theorem map.isMaximal {I : Ideal R} (H : IsMaximal I) : IsMaximal (map f I) := by
refine
or_iff_not_imp_left.1 (map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective f hf.right H) fun h => H.1.1 ?_
calc
I = comap f (map f I) := ((relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I).symm
_ = comap f ⊤ := by rw [h]
_ = ⊤ := by rw [comap_top]
#align ideal.map.is_maximal Ideal.map.isMaximal
end Bijective
theorem RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff (e : R ≃+* S) :
(⊥ : Ideal R).IsMaximal ↔ (⊥ : Ideal S).IsMaximal :=
⟨fun h => map_bot (f := e.toRingHom) ▸ map.isMaximal e.toRingHom e.bijective h, fun h =>
map_bot (f := e.symm.toRingHom) ▸ map.isMaximal e.symm.toRingHom e.symm.bijective h⟩
#align ideal.ring_equiv.bot_maximal_iff Ideal.RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {F : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_mul : map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj =>
show (f (r * s)) ∈ map f I * map f J by
rw [_root_.map_mul]; exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(span_mul_span (↑f '' ↑I) (↑f '' ↑J) ▸ (span_le.2 <|
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun i ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩ =>
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun j ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩ =>
Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 <|
hfri ▸ hfsj ▸ by rw [← _root_.map_mul]; exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj)))
#align ideal.map_mul Ideal.map_mul
/-- The pushforward `Ideal.map` as a monoid-with-zero homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom : Ideal R →*₀ Ideal S where
toFun := map f
map_mul' I J := Ideal.map_mul f I J
map_one' := by simp only [one_eq_top]; exact Ideal.map_top f
map_zero' := Ideal.map_bot
#align ideal.map_hom Ideal.mapHom
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I ^ n) = map f I ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) I n
#align ideal.map_pow Ideal.map_pow
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) := by
ext
simp [radical]
#align ideal.comap_radical Ideal.comap_radical
variable {K}
theorem IsRadical.comap (hK : K.IsRadical) : (comap f K).IsRadical := by
rw [← hK.radical, comap_radical]
apply radical_isRadical
#align ideal.is_radical.comap Ideal.IsRadical.comap
variable {I J L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun r ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
#align ideal.map_radical_le Ideal.map_radical_le
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
(map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl)
#align ideal.le_comap_mul Ideal.le_comap_mul
theorem le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) : K.comap f ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f := by
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact rfl.le
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (Ideal.mul_mono_left n_ih).trans (Ideal.le_comap_mul f)
#align ideal.le_comap_pow Ideal.le_comap_pow
end CommRing
end MapAndComap
end Ideal
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rcf : RingHomClass F R S] [FunLike G T S] [rcg : RingHomClass G T S]
variable (f : F) (g : G)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : Ideal R :=
Ideal.comap f ⊥
#align ring_hom.ker RingHom.ker
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero. -/
theorem mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 := by rw [ker, Ideal.mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot]
#align ring_hom.mem_ker RingHom.mem_ker
theorem ker_eq : (ker f : Set R) = Set.preimage f {0} :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.ker_eq RingHom.ker_eq
theorem ker_eq_comap_bot (f : F) : ker f = Ideal.comap f ⊥ :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot
theorem comap_ker (f : S →+* R) (g : T →+* S) : f.ker.comap g = ker (f.comp g) := by
rw [RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, Ideal.comap_comap, RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
#align ring_hom.comap_ker RingHom.comap_ker
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel. -/
theorem not_one_mem_ker [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : (1 : R) ∉ ker f := by
rw [mem_ker, map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
#align ring_hom.not_one_mem_ker RingHom.not_one_mem_ker
theorem ker_ne_top [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : ker f ≠ ⊤ :=
(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).mpr <| not_one_mem_ker f
#align ring_hom.ker_ne_top RingHom.ker_ne_top
lemma _root_.Pi.ker_ringHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
(φ : ∀ i, S →+* R i) : ker (Pi.ringHom φ) = ⨅ i, ker (φ i) := by
ext x
simp [mem_ker, Ideal.mem_iInf, Function.funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeSRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeSRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Semiring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
theorem injective_iff_ker_eq_bot : Function.Injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, ker_eq, Set.ext_iff]
exact injective_iff_map_eq_zero' f
#align ring_hom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 → x = 0 := by
rw [← injective_iff_map_eq_zero f, injective_iff_ker_eq_bot]
#align ring_hom.ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero RingHom.ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) : ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] using EquivLike.injective f
#align ring_hom.ker_coe_equiv RingHom.ker_coe_equiv
@[simp]
theorem ker_equiv {F' : Type*} [EquivLike F' R S] [RingEquivClass F' R S] (f : F') : ker f = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] using EquivLike.injective f
#align ring_hom.ker_equiv RingHom.ker_equiv
end Ring
section RingRing
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
theorem sub_mem_ker_iff {x y} : x - y ∈ ker f ↔ f x = f y := by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
#align ring_hom.sub_mem_ker_iff RingHom.sub_mem_ker_iff
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
end RingRing
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a domain is a prime ideal. -/
theorem ker_isPrime {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] [IsDomain S]
[FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) :
(ker f).IsPrime :=
⟨by
rw [Ne, Ideal.eq_top_iff_one]
exact not_one_mem_ker f,
fun {x y} => by
simpa only [mem_ker, map_mul] using @eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero S _ _ _ _ _⟩
#align ring_hom.ker_is_prime RingHom.ker_isPrime
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a field is a maximal ideal. -/
theorem ker_isMaximal_of_surjective {R K F : Type*} [Ring R] [Field K]
[FunLike F R K] [RingHomClass F R K] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (ker f).IsMaximal := by
refine
Ideal.isMaximal_iff.mpr
⟨fun h1 => one_ne_zero' K <| map_one f ▸ (mem_ker f).mp h1, fun J x hJ hxf hxJ => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf (f x)⁻¹
have H : 1 = y * x - (y * x - 1) := (sub_sub_cancel _ _).symm
rw [H]
refine J.sub_mem (J.mul_mem_left _ hxJ) (hJ ?_)
rw [mem_ker]
simp only [hy, map_sub, map_one, map_mul, inv_mul_cancel (mt (mem_ker f).mpr hxf), sub_self]
#align ring_hom.ker_is_maximal_of_surjective RingHom.ker_isMaximal_of_surjective
end RingHom
namespace Ideal
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {F : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 715 | 716 | theorem map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker {I : Ideal R} (f : F) : I.map f = ⊥ ↔ I ≤ RingHom.ker f := by |
rw [RingHom.ker, eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Caratheodory
/-!
# Induced Outer Measure
We can extend a function defined on a subset of `Set α` to an outer measure.
The underlying function is called `extend`, and the measure it induces is called
`inducedOuterMeasure`.
Some lemmas below are proven twice, once in the general case, and one where the function `m`
is only defined on measurable sets (i.e. when `P = MeasurableSet`). In the latter cases, we can
remove some hypotheses in the statement. The general version has the same name, but with a prime
at the end.
## Tags
outer measure
-/
#align_import measure_theory.measure.outer_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped Classical NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
open OuterMeasure
section Extend
variable {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop}
variable (m : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- We can trivially extend a function defined on a subclass of objects (with codomain `ℝ≥0∞`)
to all objects by defining it to be `∞` on the objects not in the class. -/
def extend (s : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ h : P s, m s h
#align measure_theory.extend MeasureTheory.extend
theorem extend_eq {s : α} (h : P s) : extend m s = m s h := by simp [extend, h]
#align measure_theory.extend_eq MeasureTheory.extend_eq
theorem extend_eq_top {s : α} (h : ¬P s) : extend m s = ∞ := by simp [extend, h]
#align measure_theory.extend_eq_top MeasureTheory.extend_eq_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Induced.lean | 55 | 62 | theorem smul_extend {R} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c • extend m = extend fun s h => c • m s h := by |
ext1 s
dsimp [extend]
by_cases h : P s
· simp [h]
· simp [h, ENNReal.smul_top, hc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import data.set.intervals.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder `α`, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open, or
closed) using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side. For instance,
`Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
This file contains these definitions, and basic facts on inclusion, intersection, difference of
intervals (where the precise statements may depend on the properties of the order, in particular
for some statements it should be `LinearOrder` or `DenselyOrdered`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
/-- Left-open right-open interval -/
def Ioo (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ioo Set.Ioo
/-- Left-closed right-open interval -/
def Ico (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ico Set.Ico
/-- Left-infinite right-open interval -/
def Iio (a : α) :=
{ x | x < a }
#align set.Iio Set.Iio
/-- Left-closed right-closed interval -/
def Icc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Icc Set.Icc
/-- Left-infinite right-closed interval -/
def Iic (b : α) :=
{ x | x ≤ b }
#align set.Iic Set.Iic
/-- Left-open right-closed interval -/
def Ioc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Ioc Set.Ioc
/-- Left-closed right-infinite interval -/
def Ici (a : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x }
#align set.Ici Set.Ici
/-- Left-open right-infinite interval -/
def Ioi (a : α) :=
{ x | a < x }
#align set.Ioi Set.Ioi
theorem Ioo_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x < b } = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioo_def Set.Ioo_def
theorem Ico_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b } = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ico_def Set.Ico_def
theorem Iio_def (a : α) : { x | x < a } = Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.Iio_def Set.Iio_def
theorem Icc_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b } = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Icc_def Set.Icc_def
theorem Iic_def (b : α) : { x | x ≤ b } = Iic b :=
rfl
#align set.Iic_def Set.Iic_def
theorem Ioc_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b } = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioc_def Set.Ioc_def
theorem Ici_def (a : α) : { x | a ≤ x } = Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_def Set.Ici_def
theorem Ioi_def (a : α) : { x | a < x } = Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_def Set.Ioi_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioo Set.mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ico Set.mem_Ico
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iio Set.mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Icc Set.mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iic Set.mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioc Set.mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ici Set.mem_Ici
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioi Set.mem_Ioi
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioo Set.decidableMemIoo
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ico Set.decidableMemIco
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iio Set.decidableMemIio
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Icc Set.decidableMemIcc
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iic Set.decidableMemIic
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioc Set.decidableMemIoc
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ici Set.decidableMemIci
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioi Set.decidableMemIoi
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioo Set.left_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Ico Set.left_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Icc Set.left_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioc Set.left_mem_Ioc
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
#align set.left_mem_Ici Set.left_mem_Ici
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioo Set.right_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ico Set.right_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Icc Set.right_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioc Set.right_mem_Ioc
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
#align set.right_mem_Iic Set.right_mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ici : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ici Set.dual_Ici
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iic : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iic Set.dual_Iic
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioi : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Ioi Set.dual_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem dual_Iio : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.dual_Iio Set.dual_Iio
@[simp]
theorem dual_Icc : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Icc Set.dual_Icc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioc : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioc Set.dual_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ico : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ico Set.dual_Ico
@[simp]
theorem dual_Ioo : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.dual_Ioo Set.dual_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Icc Set.nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ico Set.nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioc Set.nonempty_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ici Set.nonempty_Ici
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
#align set.nonempty_Iic Set.nonempty_Iic
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
#align set.nonempty_Ioo Set.nonempty_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
#align set.nonempty_Ioi Set.nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
#align set.nonempty_Iio Set.nonempty_Iio
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Icc_subtype Set.nonempty_Icc_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ico_subtype Set.nonempty_Ico_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioc_subtype
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
#align set.nonempty_Ici_subtype Set.nonempty_Ici_subtype
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
#align set.nonempty_Iic_subtype Set.nonempty_Iic_subtype
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
#align set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioo_subtype
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
#align set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype Set.nonempty_Ioi_subtype
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
#align set.nonempty_Iio_subtype Set.nonempty_Iio_subtype
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Icc_eq_empty Set.Icc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
#align set.Ico_eq_empty Set.Ico_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty Set.Ioc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty Set.Ioo_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt Set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ico_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le Set.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ico_self Set.Ico_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioc_self Set.Ioc_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align set.Ioo_self Set.Ioo_self
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ici Set.Ici_subset_Ici
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align set.Iic_subset_Iic Set.Iic_subset_Iic
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Ici_subset_Ioi Set.Ici_subset_Ioi
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
#align set.Iic_subset_Iio Set.Iic_subset_Iio
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico Set.Ico_subset_Ico
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_left Set.Ico_subset_Ico_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_right Set.Ico_subset_Ico_right
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc Set.Icc_subset_Icc
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_left Set.Icc_subset_Icc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_right Set.Icc_subset_Icc_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo Set.Icc_subset_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_self Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_self Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
#align set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_right Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
#align set.Ico_subset_Icc_self Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
#align set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self Set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ico_subset_Iio_self Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
#align set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic_self Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
#align set.Ico_subset_Ici_self Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
#align set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self Set.Iio_ssubset_Iic_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff Set.Icc_subset_Iic_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
#align set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff Set.Icc_subset_Ici_iff
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
#align set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioi Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici Set.Ioi_subset_Ici
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
#align set.Iio_subset_Iio Set.Iio_subset_Iio
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic Set.Iio_subset_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iic Set.Ici_inter_Iic
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_inter_Iio Set.Ici_inter_Iio
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iic Set.Ioi_inter_Iic
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_inter_Iio Set.Ioi_inter_Iio
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ici Set.Iic_inter_Ici
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ici Set.Iio_inter_Ici
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioi Set.Iic_inter_Ioi
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.Iio_inter_Ioi Set.Iio_inter_Ioi
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
#align set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ico_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
#align set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo Set.mem_Ioc_of_Ioo
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ico Set.mem_Icc_of_Ico
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
#align set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioc
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
#align set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi Set.mem_Ici_of_Ioi
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
#align set.mem_Iic_of_Iio Set.mem_Iic_of_Iio
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
#align set.Icc_eq_empty_iff Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
#align set.Ico_eq_empty_iff Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
#align set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
#align set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_top.Iic_eq IsTop.Iic_eq
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
#align is_bot.Ici_eq IsBot.Ici_eq
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ioi a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_max.Ioi_eq IsMax.Ioi_eq
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iio a = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => h.not_lt
#align is_min.Iio_eq IsMin.Iio_eq
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
#align set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le Set.Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Icc_of_gt
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt Set.not_mem_Ico_of_lt
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_gt
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Ioi_self Set.not_mem_Ioi_self
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
#align set.not_mem_Iio_self Set.not_mem_Iio_self
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioc_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ico_of_ge
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_le
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
#align set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge Set.not_mem_Ioo_of_ge
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align set.Icc_self Set.Icc_self
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h.subst <| right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
#align set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
#align set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge Set.subsingleton_Icc_of_ge
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [ge_iff_le, gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
#align set.Icc_diff_left Set.Icc_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
#align set.Icc_diff_right Set.Icc_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
#align set.Ico_diff_left Set.Ico_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
#align set.Ioc_diff_right Set.Ioc_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
#align set.Icc_diff_both Set.Icc_diff_both
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
#align set.Ici_diff_left Set.Ici_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
#align set.Iic_diff_right Set.Iic_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
#align set.Ico_diff_Ioo_same Set.Ico_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
#align set.Ioc_diff_Ioo_same Set.Ioc_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ico_same Set.Icc_diff_Ico_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ioc_same Set.Icc_diff_Ioc_same
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
#align set.Icc_diff_Ioo_same Set.Icc_diff_Ioo_same
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ioi_same Set.Ici_diff_Ioi_same
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iio_same Set.Iic_diff_Iio_same
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
#align set.Ioi_union_left Set.Ioi_union_left
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
#align set.Iio_union_right Set.Iio_union_right
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
#align set.Ioo_union_left Set.Ioo_union_left
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioo, dual_Ico] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
#align set.Ioo_union_right Set.Ioo_union_right
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
#align set.Ioc_union_left Set.Ioc_union_left
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioc, dual_Icc] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
#align set.Ico_union_right Set.Ico_union_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
#align set.Ico_insert_right Set.Ico_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
#align set.Ioc_insert_left Set.Ioc_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
#align set.Ioo_insert_left Set.Ioo_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
#align set.Ioo_insert_right Set.Ioo_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
#align set.Iio_insert Set.Iio_insert
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
#align set.Ioi_insert Set.Ioi_insert
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
#align set.mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
#align set.mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset Set.mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 955 | 972 | theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by |
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang, Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
#align_import algebra.module.localized_module from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
/-!
# Localized Module
Given a commutative semiring `R`, a multiplicative subset `S ⊆ R` and an `R`-module `M`, we can
localize `M` by `S`. This gives us a `Localization S`-module.
## Main definitions
* `LocalizedModule.r` : the equivalence relation defining this localization, namely
`(m, s) ≈ (m', s')` if and only if there is some `u : S` such that `u • s' • m = u • s • m'`.
* `LocalizedModule M S` : the localized module by `S`.
* `LocalizedModule.mk` : the canonical map sending `(m, s) : M × S ↦ m/s : LocalizedModule M S`
* `LocalizedModule.liftOn` : any well defined function `f : M × S → α` respecting `r` descents to
a function `LocalizedModule M S → α`
* `LocalizedModule.liftOn₂` : any well defined function `f : M × S → M × S → α` respecting `r`
descents to a function `LocalizedModule M S → LocalizedModule M S`
* `LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk` : in the localized module
`mk m s + mk m' s' = mk (s' • m + s • m') (s * s')`
* `LocalizedModule.mk_smul_mk` : in the localized module, for any `r : R`, `s t : S`, `m : M`,
we have `mk r s • mk m t = mk (r • m) (s * t)` where `mk r s : Localization S` is localized ring
by `S`.
* `LocalizedModule.isModule` : `LocalizedModule M S` is a `Localization S`-module.
## Future work
* Redefine `Localization` for monoids and rings to coincide with `LocalizedModule`.
-/
namespace LocalizedModule
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R)
variable (M : Type v) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (T : Type*) [CommSemiring T] [Algebra R T] [IsLocalization S T]
/-- The equivalence relation on `M × S` where `(m1, s1) ≈ (m2, s2)` if and only if
for some (u : S), u * (s2 • m1 - s1 • m2) = 0-/
/- Porting note: We use small letter `r` since `R` is used for a ring. -/
def r (a b : M × S) : Prop :=
∃ u : S, u • b.2 • a.1 = u • a.2 • b.1
#align localized_module.r LocalizedModule.r
theorem r.isEquiv : IsEquiv _ (r S M) :=
{ refl := fun ⟨m, s⟩ => ⟨1, by rw [one_smul]⟩
trans := fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨m3, s3⟩ ⟨u1, hu1⟩ ⟨u2, hu2⟩ => by
use u1 * u2 * s2
-- Put everything in the same shape, sorting the terms using `simp`
have hu1' := congr_arg ((u2 * s3) • ·) hu1.symm
have hu2' := congr_arg ((u1 * s1) • ·) hu2.symm
simp only [← mul_smul, smul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] at hu1' hu2' ⊢
rw [hu2', hu1']
symm := fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨u, hu.symm⟩ }
#align localized_module.r.is_equiv LocalizedModule.r.isEquiv
instance r.setoid : Setoid (M × S) where
r := r S M
iseqv := ⟨(r.isEquiv S M).refl, (r.isEquiv S M).symm _ _, (r.isEquiv S M).trans _ _ _⟩
#align localized_module.r.setoid LocalizedModule.r.setoid
-- TODO: change `Localization` to use `r'` instead of `r` so that the two types are also defeq,
-- `Localization S = LocalizedModule S R`.
example {R} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R) : ⇑(Localization.r' S) = LocalizedModule.r S R :=
rfl
/-- If `S` is a multiplicative subset of a ring `R` and `M` an `R`-module, then
we can localize `M` by `S`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def _root_.LocalizedModule : Type max u v :=
Quotient (r.setoid S M)
#align localized_module LocalizedModule
section
variable {M S}
/-- The canonical map sending `(m, s) ↦ m/s`-/
def mk (m : M) (s : S) : LocalizedModule S M :=
Quotient.mk' ⟨m, s⟩
#align localized_module.mk LocalizedModule.mk
theorem mk_eq {m m' : M} {s s' : S} : mk m s = mk m' s' ↔ ∃ u : S, u • s' • m = u • s • m' :=
Quotient.eq'
#align localized_module.mk_eq LocalizedModule.mk_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {β : LocalizedModule S M → Prop} (h : ∀ (m : M) (s : S), β (mk m s)) :
∀ x : LocalizedModule S M, β x := by
rintro ⟨⟨m, s⟩⟩
exact h m s
#align localized_module.induction_on LocalizedModule.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {β : LocalizedModule S M → LocalizedModule S M → Prop}
(h : ∀ (m m' : M) (s s' : S), β (mk m s) (mk m' s')) : ∀ x y, β x y := by
rintro ⟨⟨m, s⟩⟩ ⟨⟨m', s'⟩⟩
exact h m m' s s'
#align localized_module.induction_on₂ LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
/-- If `f : M × S → α` respects the equivalence relation `LocalizedModule.r`, then
`f` descents to a map `LocalizedModule M S → α`.
-/
def liftOn {α : Type*} (x : LocalizedModule S M) (f : M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p p' : M × S), p ≈ p' → f p = f p') : α :=
Quotient.liftOn x f wd
#align localized_module.lift_on LocalizedModule.liftOn
theorem liftOn_mk {α : Type*} {f : M × S → α} (wd : ∀ (p p' : M × S), p ≈ p' → f p = f p')
(m : M) (s : S) : liftOn (mk m s) f wd = f ⟨m, s⟩ := by convert Quotient.liftOn_mk f wd ⟨m, s⟩
#align localized_module.lift_on_mk LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk
/-- If `f : M × S → M × S → α` respects the equivalence relation `LocalizedModule.r`, then
`f` descents to a map `LocalizedModule M S → LocalizedModule M S → α`.
-/
def liftOn₂ {α : Type*} (x y : LocalizedModule S M) (f : M × S → M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p q p' q' : M × S), p ≈ p' → q ≈ q' → f p q = f p' q') : α :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ x y f wd
#align localized_module.lift_on₂ LocalizedModule.liftOn₂
theorem liftOn₂_mk {α : Type*} (f : M × S → M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p q p' q' : M × S), p ≈ p' → q ≈ q' → f p q = f p' q') (m m' : M)
(s s' : S) : liftOn₂ (mk m s) (mk m' s') f wd = f ⟨m, s⟩ ⟨m', s'⟩ := by
convert Quotient.liftOn₂_mk f wd _ _
#align localized_module.lift_on₂_mk LocalizedModule.liftOn₂_mk
instance : Zero (LocalizedModule S M) :=
⟨mk 0 1⟩
/-- If `S` contains `0` then the localization at `S` is trivial. -/
theorem subsingleton (h : 0 ∈ S) : Subsingleton (LocalizedModule S M) := by
refine ⟨fun a b ↦ ?_⟩
induction a,b using LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨⟨0, h⟩, by simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul, zero_smul]⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_mk (s : S) : mk (0 : M) s = 0 :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, smul_zero, smul_zero, one_smul]⟩
#align localized_module.zero_mk LocalizedModule.zero_mk
instance : Add (LocalizedModule S M) where
add p1 p2 :=
liftOn₂ p1 p2 (fun x y => mk (y.2 • x.1 + x.2 • y.1) (x.2 * y.2)) <|
fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨m1', s1'⟩ ⟨m2', s2'⟩ ⟨u1, hu1⟩ ⟨u2, hu2⟩ =>
mk_eq.mpr
⟨u1 * u2, by
-- Put everything in the same shape, sorting the terms using `simp`
have hu1' := congr_arg ((u2 * s2 * s2') • ·) hu1
have hu2' := congr_arg ((u1 * s1 * s1') • ·) hu2
simp only [smul_add, ← mul_smul, smul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm] at hu1' hu2' ⊢
rw [hu1', hu2']⟩
theorem mk_add_mk {m1 m2 : M} {s1 s2 : S} :
mk m1 s1 + mk m2 s2 = mk (s2 • m1 + s1 • m2) (s1 * s2) :=
mk_eq.mpr <| ⟨1, rfl⟩
#align localized_module.mk_add_mk LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk
/-- Porting note: Some auxiliary lemmas are declared with `private` in the original mathlib3 file.
We take that policy here as well, and remove the `#align` lines accordingly. -/
private theorem add_assoc' (x y z : LocalizedModule S M) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
induction' x using LocalizedModule.induction_on with mx sx
induction' y using LocalizedModule.induction_on with my sy
induction' z using LocalizedModule.induction_on with mz sz
simp only [mk_add_mk, smul_add]
refine mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, ?_⟩
rw [one_smul, one_smul]
congr 1
· rw [mul_assoc]
· rw [eq_comm, mul_comm, add_assoc, mul_smul, mul_smul, ← mul_smul sx sz, mul_comm, mul_smul]
private theorem add_comm' (x y : LocalizedModule S M) : x + y = y + x :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on₂ (fun m m' s s' => by rw [mk_add_mk, mk_add_mk, add_comm, mul_comm])
x y
private theorem zero_add' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : 0 + x = x :=
induction_on
(fun m s => by
rw [← zero_mk s, mk_add_mk, smul_zero, zero_add, mk_eq];
exact ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, mul_smul, one_smul]⟩)
x
private theorem add_zero' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : x + 0 = x :=
induction_on
(fun m s => by
rw [← zero_mk s, mk_add_mk, smul_zero, add_zero, mk_eq];
exact ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, mul_smul, one_smul]⟩)
x
instance hasNatSMul : SMul ℕ (LocalizedModule S M) where smul n := nsmulRec n
#align localized_module.has_nat_smul LocalizedModule.hasNatSMul
private theorem nsmul_zero' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : (0 : ℕ) • x = 0 :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on (fun _ _ => rfl) x
private theorem nsmul_succ' (n : ℕ) (x : LocalizedModule S M) : n.succ • x = n • x + x :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on (fun _ _ => rfl) x
instance : AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S M) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := add_assoc'
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add'
add_zero := add_zero'
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := nsmul_zero'
nsmul_succ := nsmul_succ'
add_comm := add_comm'
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] : Neg (LocalizedModule S M) where
neg p :=
liftOn p (fun x => LocalizedModule.mk (-x.1) x.2) fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => by
rw [mk_eq]
exact ⟨u, by simpa⟩
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] : AddCommGroup (LocalizedModule S M) :=
{ show AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S M) by infer_instance with
add_left_neg := by
rintro ⟨m, s⟩
change
(liftOn (mk m s) (fun x => mk (-x.1) x.2) fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => by
rw [mk_eq]
exact ⟨u, by simpa⟩) +
mk m s =
0
rw [liftOn_mk, mk_add_mk]
simp
-- TODO: fix the diamond
zsmul := zsmulRec }
theorem mk_neg {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {m : M} {s : S} : mk (-m) s = -mk m s :=
rfl
#align localized_module.mk_neg LocalizedModule.mk_neg
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Monoid (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ mul := fun m₁ m₂ =>
liftOn₂ m₁ m₂ (fun x₁ x₂ => LocalizedModule.mk (x₁.1 * x₂.1) (x₁.2 * x₂.2))
(by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨b₁, t₁⟩ ⟨b₂, t₂⟩ ⟨u₁, e₁⟩ ⟨u₂, e₂⟩
rw [mk_eq]
use u₁ * u₂
dsimp only at e₁ e₂ ⊢
rw [eq_comm]
trans (u₁ • t₁ • a₁) • u₂ • t₂ • a₂
on_goal 1 => rw [e₁, e₂]
on_goal 2 => rw [eq_comm]
all_goals
rw [smul_smul, mul_mul_mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, ← smul_eq_mul A, smul_smul_smul_comm,
mul_smul, mul_smul])
one := mk 1 (1 : S)
one_mul := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_mul, one_smul]⟩
mul_one := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [mul_one, one_smul]⟩
mul_assoc := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm] }
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Semiring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show (AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance,
show (Monoid (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance with
left_distrib := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_add, mul_add, mul_smul_comm, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_right_comm]
right_distrib := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_add, add_mul, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc,
mul_right_comm]
zero_mul := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [zero_mul, smul_zero]⟩
mul_zero := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [mul_zero, smul_zero]⟩ }
instance {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
CommSemiring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show Semiring (LocalizedModule S A) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_smul, mul_comm]⟩ }
instance {A : Type*} [Ring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Ring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (LocalizedModule S A)),
inferInstanceAs (Semiring (LocalizedModule S A)) with }
instance {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
CommRing (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show (Ring (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_smul, mul_comm]⟩ }
theorem mk_mul_mk {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {a₁ a₂ : A} {s₁ s₂ : S} :
mk a₁ s₁ * mk a₂ s₂ = mk (a₁ * a₂) (s₁ * s₂) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.mk_mul_mk LocalizedModule.mk_mul_mk
noncomputable instance : SMul T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul x p :=
let a := IsLocalization.sec S x
liftOn p (fun p ↦ mk (a.1 • p.1) (a.2 * p.2))
(by
rintro p p' ⟨s, h⟩
refine mk_eq.mpr ⟨s, ?_⟩
calc
_ = a.2 • a.1 • s • p'.2 • p.1 := by
simp_rw [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_smul]; ring_nf
_ = a.2 • a.1 • s • p.2 • p'.1 := by rw [h]
_ = s • (a.2 * p.2) • a.1 • p'.1 := by
simp_rw [Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_smul, Submonoid.coe_mul]; ring_nf )
theorem smul_def (x : T) (m : M) (s : S) :
x • mk m s = mk ((IsLocalization.sec S x).1 • m) ((IsLocalization.sec S x).2 * s) := rfl
theorem mk'_smul_mk (r : R) (m : M) (s s' : S) :
IsLocalization.mk' T r s • mk m s' = mk (r • m) (s * s') := by
rw [smul_def, mk_eq]
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := IsLocalization.eq.mp <| IsLocalization.mk'_sec T (IsLocalization.mk' T r s)
use c
simp_rw [← mul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ (s':R), mul_assoc, hc]
theorem mk_smul_mk (r : R) (m : M) (s t : S) :
Localization.mk r s • mk m t = mk (r • m) (s * t) := by
rw [Localization.mk_eq_mk']
exact mk'_smul_mk ..
#align localized_module.mk_smul_mk LocalizedModule.mk_smul_mk
variable {T}
private theorem one_smul_aux (p : LocalizedModule S M) : (1 : T) • p = p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [show (1:T) = IsLocalization.mk' T (1:R) (1:S) by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_one, map_one]]
rw [mk'_smul_mk, one_smul, one_mul]
private theorem mul_smul_aux (x y : T) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
(x * y) • p = x • y • p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, ← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T y]
simp_rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_mul, mk'_smul_mk, ← mul_smul, mul_assoc]
private theorem smul_add_aux (x : T) (p q : LocalizedModule S M) :
x • (p + q) = x • p + x • q := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
induction' q using LocalizedModule.induction_on with n t
rw [smul_def, smul_def, mk_add_mk, mk_add_mk]
rw [show x • _ = IsLocalization.mk' T _ _ • _ by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T]]
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_cancel _ _ (IsLocalization.sec S x).2, mk'_smul_mk]
congr 1
· simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, smul_add, ← mul_smul, Submonoid.coe_mul]; ring_nf
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm] -- ring does not work here
private theorem smul_zero_aux (x : T) : x • (0 : LocalizedModule S M) = 0 := by
erw [smul_def, smul_zero, zero_mk]
private theorem add_smul_aux (x y : T) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
(x + y) • p = x • p + y • p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [smul_def T x, smul_def T y, mk_add_mk, show (x + y) • _ = IsLocalization.mk' T _ _ • _ by
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, ← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T y,
← IsLocalization.mk'_add, IsLocalization.mk'_cancel _ _ s], mk'_smul_mk, ← smul_assoc,
← smul_assoc, ← add_smul]
congr 1
· simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, smul_eq_mul]; ring_nf
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_assoc] -- ring does not work here
private theorem zero_smul_aux (p : LocalizedModule S M) : (0 : T) • p = 0 := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [show (0:T) = IsLocalization.mk' T (0:R) (1:S) by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_zero], mk'_smul_mk,
zero_smul, zero_mk]
noncomputable instance isModule : Module T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul := one_smul_aux
mul_smul := mul_smul_aux
smul_add := smul_add_aux
smul_zero := smul_zero_aux
add_smul := add_smul_aux
zero_smul := zero_smul_aux
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel_common_left (s' s : S) (m : M) : mk (s' • m) (s' * s) = mk m s :=
mk_eq.mpr
⟨1, by
simp only [mul_smul, one_smul]
rw [smul_comm]⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel_common_left LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel (s : S) (m : M) : mk (s • m) s = mk m 1 :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel LocalizedModule.mk_cancel
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel_common_right (s s' : S) (m : M) : mk (s' • m) (s * s') = mk m s :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp [mul_smul]⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel_common_right LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_right
noncomputable instance isModule' : Module R (LocalizedModule S M) :=
{ Module.compHom (LocalizedModule S M) <| algebraMap R (Localization S) with }
#align localized_module.is_module' LocalizedModule.isModule'
theorem smul'_mk (r : R) (s : S) (m : M) : r • mk m s = mk (r • m) s := by
erw [mk_smul_mk r m 1 s, one_mul]
#align localized_module.smul'_mk LocalizedModule.smul'_mk
theorem smul'_mul {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (x : T) (p₁ p₂ : LocalizedModule S A) :
x • p₁ * p₂ = x • (p₁ * p₂) := by
induction p₁, p₂ using induction_on₂ with | _ a₁ s₁ a₂ s₂ => _
rw [mk_mul_mk, smul_def, smul_def, mk_mul_mk, mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc]
theorem mul_smul' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (x : T) (p₁ p₂ : LocalizedModule S A) :
p₁ * x • p₂ = x • (p₁ * p₂) := by
induction p₁, p₂ using induction_on₂ with | _ a₁ s₁ a₂ s₂ => _
rw [smul_def, mk_mul_mk, mk_mul_mk, smul_def, mul_left_comm, mul_smul_comm]
variable (T)
noncomputable instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Algebra T (LocalizedModule S A) :=
Algebra.ofModule smul'_mul mul_smul'
theorem algebraMap_mk' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (a : R) (s : S) :
algebraMap _ _ (IsLocalization.mk' T a s) = mk (algebraMap R A a) s := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
change _ • mk _ _ = _
rw [mk'_smul_mk, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, mul_one]
theorem algebraMap_mk {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (a : R) (s : S) :
algebraMap _ _ (Localization.mk a s) = mk (algebraMap R A a) s := by
rw [Localization.mk_eq_mk']
exact algebraMap_mk' ..
#align localized_module.algebra_map_mk LocalizedModule.algebraMap_mk
instance : IsScalarTower R T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul_assoc r x p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, IsLocalization.smul_mk', mk'_smul_mk, mk'_smul_mk,
smul'_mk, mul_smul]
noncomputable instance algebra' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] :
Algebra R (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ (algebraMap (Localization S) (LocalizedModule S A)).comp (algebraMap R <| Localization S),
show Module R (LocalizedModule S A) by infer_instance with
commutes' := by
intro r x
induction x using induction_on with | _ a s => _
dsimp
rw [← Localization.mk_one_eq_algebraMap, algebraMap_mk, mk_mul_mk, mk_mul_mk, mul_comm,
Algebra.commutes]
smul_def' := by
intro r x
induction x using induction_on with | _ a s => _
dsimp
rw [← Localization.mk_one_eq_algebraMap, algebraMap_mk, mk_mul_mk, smul'_mk,
Algebra.smul_def, one_mul] }
#align localized_module.algebra' LocalizedModule.algebra'
section
variable (S M)
/-- The function `m ↦ m / 1` as an `R`-linear map.
-/
@[simps]
def mkLinearMap : M →ₗ[R] LocalizedModule S M where
toFun m := mk m 1
map_add' x y := by simp [mk_add_mk]
map_smul' r x := (smul'_mk _ _ _).symm
#align localized_module.mk_linear_map LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap
end
/-- For any `s : S`, there is an `R`-linear map given by `a/b ↦ a/(b*s)`.
-/
@[simps]
def divBy (s : S) : LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] LocalizedModule S M where
toFun p :=
p.liftOn (fun p => mk p.1 (p.2 * s)) fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨a', b'⟩ ⟨c, eq1⟩ =>
mk_eq.mpr ⟨c, by rw [mul_smul, mul_smul, smul_comm _ s, smul_comm _ s, eq1, smul_comm _ s,
smul_comm _ s]⟩
map_add' x y := by
refine x.induction_on₂ ?_ y
intro m₁ m₂ t₁ t₂
simp_rw [mk_add_mk, LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, mk_add_mk, mul_smul, mul_comm _ s, mul_assoc,
smul_comm _ s, ← smul_add, mul_left_comm s t₁ t₂, mk_cancel_common_left s]
map_smul' r x := by
refine x.induction_on (fun _ _ ↦ ?_)
dsimp only
change liftOn (mk _ _) _ _ = r • (liftOn (mk _ _) _ _)
simp_rw [liftOn_mk, mul_assoc, ← smul_def]
congr!
#align localized_module.div_by LocalizedModule.divBy
theorem divBy_mul_by (s : S) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
divBy s (algebraMap R (Module.End R (LocalizedModule S M)) s p) = p :=
p.induction_on fun m t => by
rw [Module.algebraMap_end_apply, divBy_apply]
erw [smul_def]
rw [LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, mul_assoc, ← smul_def]
erw [smul'_mk]
rw [← Submonoid.smul_def, mk_cancel_common_right _ s]
#align localized_module.div_by_mul_by LocalizedModule.divBy_mul_by
theorem mul_by_divBy (s : S) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
algebraMap R (Module.End R (LocalizedModule S M)) s (divBy s p) = p :=
p.induction_on fun m t => by
rw [divBy_apply, Module.algebraMap_end_apply, LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, smul'_mk,
← Submonoid.smul_def, mk_cancel_common_right _ s]
#align localized_module.mul_by_div_by LocalizedModule.mul_by_divBy
end
end LocalizedModule
section IsLocalizedModule
universe u v
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R)
variable {M M' M'' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M'']
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Module A M'] [IsLocalization S A]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M''] [IsScalarTower R A M']
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
/-- The characteristic predicate for localized module.
`IsLocalizedModule S f` describes that `f : M ⟶ M'` is the localization map identifying `M'` as
`LocalizedModule S M`.
-/
@[mk_iff] class IsLocalizedModule : Prop where
map_units : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M') x)
surj' : ∀ y : M', ∃ x : M × S, x.2 • y = f x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ {x₁ x₂}, f x₁ = f x₂ → ∃ c : S, c • x₁ = c • x₂
#align is_localized_module IsLocalizedModule
attribute [nolint docBlame] IsLocalizedModule.map_units IsLocalizedModule.surj'
IsLocalizedModule.exists_of_eq
-- Porting note: Manually added to make `S` and `f` explicit.
lemma IsLocalizedModule.surj [IsLocalizedModule S f] (y : M') : ∃ x : M × S, x.2 • y = f x.1 :=
surj' y
-- Porting note: Manually added to make `S` and `f` explicit.
lemma IsLocalizedModule.eq_iff_exists [IsLocalizedModule S f] {x₁ x₂} :
f x₁ = f x₂ ↔ ∃ c : S, c • x₁ = c • x₂ :=
Iff.intro exists_of_eq fun ⟨c, h⟩ ↦ by
apply_fun f at h
simp_rw [f.map_smul_of_tower, Submonoid.smul_def, ← Module.algebraMap_end_apply R R] at h
exact ((Module.End_isUnit_iff _).mp <| map_units f c).1 h
theorem IsLocalizedModule.of_linearEquiv (e : M' ≃ₗ[R] M'') [hf : IsLocalizedModule S f] :
IsLocalizedModule S (e ∘ₗ f : M →ₗ[R] M'') where
map_units s := by
rw [show algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') s = e ∘ₗ (algebraMap R (Module.End R M') s) ∘ₗ e.symm
by ext; simp, Module.End_isUnit_iff, LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, EquivLike.comp_bijective, EquivLike.bijective_comp]
exact (Module.End_isUnit_iff _).mp <| hf.map_units s
surj' x := by
obtain ⟨p, h⟩ := hf.surj' (e.symm x)
exact ⟨p, by rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, ← e.congr_arg h,
Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.smul_def, LinearEquiv.map_smul, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]⟩
exists_of_eq h := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply,
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq] at h
exact hf.exists_of_eq h
variable (M) in
lemma isLocalizedModule_id (R') [CommSemiring R'] [Algebra R R'] [IsLocalization S R'] [Module R' M]
[IsScalarTower R R' M] : IsLocalizedModule S (.id : M →ₗ[R] M) where
map_units s := by
rw [← (Algebra.lsmul R (A := R') R M).commutes]; exact (IsLocalization.map_units R' s).map _
surj' m := ⟨(m, 1), one_smul _ _⟩
exists_of_eq h := ⟨1, congr_arg _ h⟩
variable {S} in
theorem isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization {A Aₛ} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [CommSemiring Aₛ]
[Algebra A Aₛ] [Algebra R Aₛ] [IsScalarTower R A Aₛ] :
IsLocalizedModule S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A Aₛ).toLinearMap ↔
IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid A S) Aₛ := by
rw [isLocalizedModule_iff, isLocalization_iff]
refine and_congr ?_ (and_congr (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ ?_) (forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ ?_))
· simp_rw [← (Algebra.lmul R Aₛ).commutes, Algebra.lmul_isUnit_iff, Subtype.forall,
Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid, ← SetLike.mem_coe, Submonoid.coe_map,
Set.forall_mem_image, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
· simp_rw [Prod.exists, Subtype.exists, Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid]
simp [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, Submonoid.mk_smul, Algebra.smul_def, mul_comm]
· congr!; simp_rw [Subtype.exists, Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid]; simp [Algebra.smul_def]
instance {A Aₛ} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A][CommSemiring Aₛ] [Algebra A Aₛ] [Algebra R Aₛ]
[IsScalarTower R A Aₛ] [h : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid A S) Aₛ] :
IsLocalizedModule S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A Aₛ).toLinearMap :=
isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization.mpr h
lemma isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization' (R') [CommSemiring R'] [Algebra R R'] :
IsLocalizedModule S (Algebra.ofId R R').toLinearMap ↔ IsLocalization S R' := by
convert isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization (S := S) (A := R) (Aₛ := R')
exact (Submonoid.map_id S).symm
namespace LocalizedModule
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `LocalizedModule S M → M''`.
-/
noncomputable def lift' (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
(h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') x)) : LocalizedModule S M → M'' :=
fun m =>
m.liftOn (fun p => (h p.2).unit⁻¹.val <| g p.1) fun ⟨m, s⟩ ⟨m', s'⟩ ⟨c, eq1⟩ => by
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`. This does nothing here.
dsimp only
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def] at eq1
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← map_smul, eq_comm,
Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff]
have : c • s • g m' = c • s' • g m := by
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, ← g.map_smul, eq1]
have : Function.Injective (h c).unit.inv := by
rw [Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse]
refine ⟨(h c).unit, ?_⟩
intro x
change ((h c).unit.1 * (h c).unit.inv) x = x
simp only [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, IsUnit.mul_val_inv, LinearMap.one_apply]
apply_fun (h c).unit.inv
erw [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ←
(h c).unit⁻¹.val.map_smul]
symm
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← g.map_smul, ← g.map_smul, ← g.map_smul, ←
g.map_smul, eq1]
#align localized_module.lift' LocalizedModule.lift'
theorem lift'_mk (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(m : M) (s : S) :
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (LocalizedModule.mk m s) = (h s).unit⁻¹.val (g m) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.lift'_mk LocalizedModule.lift'_mk
theorem lift'_add (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(x y) :
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (x + y) =
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h x + LocalizedModule.lift' S g h y :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
(by
intro a a' b b'
erw [LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2 h3`. This only generalize `h1`.
erw [map_add, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, smul_add, ← map_smul,
← map_smul, ← map_smul]
congr 1 <;> symm
· erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, mul_smul, ← map_smul]
rfl
· dsimp
erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, mul_comm, mul_smul, ← map_smul]
rfl)
x y
#align localized_module.lift'_add LocalizedModule.lift'_add
theorem lift'_smul (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(r : R) (m) : r • LocalizedModule.lift' S g h m = LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (r • m) :=
m.induction_on fun a b => by
rw [LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.smul'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`. This does nothing here.
rw [← map_smul, ← g.map_smul]
#align localized_module.lift'_smul LocalizedModule.lift'_smul
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `LocalizedModule S M → M''`.
-/
noncomputable def lift (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
(h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) :
LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] M'' where
toFun := LocalizedModule.lift' S g h
map_add' := LocalizedModule.lift'_add S g h
map_smul' r x := by rw [LocalizedModule.lift'_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
#align localized_module.lift LocalizedModule.lift
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
`lift g m s = s⁻¹ • g m`.
-/
theorem lift_mk
(g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') x)) (m : M) (s : S) :
LocalizedModule.lift S g h (LocalizedModule.mk m s) = (h s).unit⁻¹.val (g m) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.lift_mk LocalizedModule.lift_mk
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `lift g ∘ mkLinearMap = g`.
-/
theorem lift_comp (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) :
(lift S g h).comp (mkLinearMap S M) = g := by
ext x; dsimp; rw [LocalizedModule.lift_mk]
erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, one_smul]
#align localized_module.lift_comp LocalizedModule.lift_comp
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible and
`l` is another linear map `LocalizedModule S M ⟶ M''` such that `l ∘ mkLinearMap = g` then
`l = lift g`
-/
theorem lift_unique (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(l : LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] M'') (hl : l.comp (LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap S M) = g) :
LocalizedModule.lift S g h = l := by
ext x; induction' x using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [LocalizedModule.lift_mk]
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← hl, LinearMap.coe_comp,
Function.comp_apply, LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap_apply, ← l.map_smul, LocalizedModule.smul'_mk]
congr 1; rw [LocalizedModule.mk_eq]
refine ⟨1, ?_⟩; simp only [one_smul, Submonoid.smul_def]
#align localized_module.lift_unique LocalizedModule.lift_unique
end LocalizedModule
instance localizedModuleIsLocalizedModule :
IsLocalizedModule S (LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap S M) where
map_units s :=
⟨⟨algebraMap R (Module.End R (LocalizedModule S M)) s, LocalizedModule.divBy s,
DFunLike.ext _ _ <| LocalizedModule.mul_by_divBy s,
DFunLike.ext _ _ <| LocalizedModule.divBy_mul_by s⟩,
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun p =>
p.induction_on <| by
intros
rfl⟩
surj' p :=
p.induction_on fun m t => by
refine ⟨⟨m, t⟩, ?_⟩
erw [LocalizedModule.smul'_mk, LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap_apply, Submonoid.coe_subtype,
LocalizedModule.mk_cancel t]
exists_of_eq eq1 := by simpa only [eq_comm, one_smul] using LocalizedModule.mk_eq.mp eq1
#align localized_module_is_localized_module localizedModuleIsLocalizedModule
namespace IsLocalizedModule
variable [IsLocalizedModule S f]
/-- If `(M', f : M ⟶ M')` satisfies universal property of localized module, there is a canonical
map `LocalizedModule S M ⟶ M'`.
-/
noncomputable def fromLocalizedModule' : LocalizedModule S M → M' := fun p =>
p.liftOn (fun x => (IsLocalizedModule.map_units f x.2).unit⁻¹.val (f x.1))
(by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨a', b'⟩ ⟨c, eq1⟩
dsimp
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`.
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← map_smul, ← map_smul,
Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff', ← map_smul]
exact (IsLocalizedModule.eq_iff_exists S f).mpr ⟨c, eq1.symm⟩)
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module' IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule'
@[simp]
theorem fromLocalizedModule'_mk (m : M) (s : S) :
fromLocalizedModule' S f (LocalizedModule.mk m s) =
(IsLocalizedModule.map_units f s).unit⁻¹.val (f m) :=
rfl
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module'_mk IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule'_mk
theorem fromLocalizedModule'_add (x y : LocalizedModule S M) :
fromLocalizedModule' S f (x + y) = fromLocalizedModule' S f x + fromLocalizedModule' S f y :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
(by
intro a a' b b'
simp only [LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk, fromLocalizedModule'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2 h3`.
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, smul_add, ← map_smul, ← map_smul,
← map_smul, map_add]
congr 1
all_goals rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff']
· simp [mul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def]
· rw [Submonoid.coe_mul, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, mul_comm, mul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def])
x y
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module'_add IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule'_add
theorem fromLocalizedModule'_smul (r : R) (x : LocalizedModule S M) :
r • fromLocalizedModule' S f x = fromLocalizedModule' S f (r • x) :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on
(by
intro a b
rw [fromLocalizedModule'_mk, LocalizedModule.smul'_mk, fromLocalizedModule'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1`.
rw [f.map_smul, map_smul])
x
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module'_smul IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule'_smul
/-- If `(M', f : M ⟶ M')` satisfies universal property of localized module, there is a canonical
map `LocalizedModule S M ⟶ M'`.
-/
noncomputable def fromLocalizedModule : LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] M' where
toFun := fromLocalizedModule' S f
map_add' := fromLocalizedModule'_add S f
map_smul' r x := by rw [fromLocalizedModule'_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule
theorem fromLocalizedModule_mk (m : M) (s : S) :
fromLocalizedModule S f (LocalizedModule.mk m s) =
(IsLocalizedModule.map_units f s).unit⁻¹.val (f m) :=
rfl
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module_mk IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule_mk
theorem fromLocalizedModule.inj : Function.Injective <| fromLocalizedModule S f := fun x y eq1 => by
induction' x using LocalizedModule.induction_on with a b
induction' y using LocalizedModule.induction_on with a' b'
simp only [fromLocalizedModule_mk] at eq1
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`.
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← LinearMap.map_smul,
Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff'] at eq1
rw [LocalizedModule.mk_eq, ← IsLocalizedModule.eq_iff_exists S f, Submonoid.smul_def,
Submonoid.smul_def, f.map_smul, f.map_smul, eq1]
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module.inj IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule.inj
theorem fromLocalizedModule.surj : Function.Surjective <| fromLocalizedModule S f := fun x =>
let ⟨⟨m, s⟩, eq1⟩ := IsLocalizedModule.surj S f x
⟨LocalizedModule.mk m s, by
rw [fromLocalizedModule_mk, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← eq1,
Submonoid.smul_def]⟩
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module.surj IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule.surj
theorem fromLocalizedModule.bij : Function.Bijective <| fromLocalizedModule S f :=
⟨fromLocalizedModule.inj _ _, fromLocalizedModule.surj _ _⟩
#align is_localized_module.from_localized_module.bij IsLocalizedModule.fromLocalizedModule.bij
/--
If `(M', f : M ⟶ M')` satisfies universal property of localized module, then `M'` is isomorphic to
`LocalizedModule S M` as an `R`-module.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def iso : LocalizedModule S M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
{ fromLocalizedModule S f,
Equiv.ofBijective (fromLocalizedModule S f) <| fromLocalizedModule.bij _ _ with }
#align is_localized_module.iso IsLocalizedModule.iso
theorem iso_apply_mk (m : M) (s : S) :
iso S f (LocalizedModule.mk m s) = (IsLocalizedModule.map_units f s).unit⁻¹.val (f m) :=
rfl
#align is_localized_module.iso_apply_mk IsLocalizedModule.iso_apply_mk
theorem iso_symm_apply_aux (m : M') :
(iso S f).symm m =
LocalizedModule.mk (IsLocalizedModule.surj S f m).choose.1
(IsLocalizedModule.surj S f m).choose.2 := by
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs _ h2`.
apply_fun iso S f using LinearEquiv.injective (iso S f)
rw [LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
simp only [iso_apply, LinearMap.toFun_eq_coe, fromLocalizedModule_mk]
erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff', (surj' _).choose_spec]
#align is_localized_module.iso_symm_apply_aux IsLocalizedModule.iso_symm_apply_aux
theorem iso_symm_apply' (m : M') (a : M) (b : S) (eq1 : b • m = f a) :
(iso S f).symm m = LocalizedModule.mk a b :=
(iso_symm_apply_aux S f m).trans <|
LocalizedModule.mk_eq.mpr <| by
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1`.
rw [← IsLocalizedModule.eq_iff_exists S f, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.smul_def, f.map_smul,
f.map_smul, ← (surj' _).choose_spec, ← Submonoid.smul_def, ← Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_smul,
mul_comm, mul_smul, eq1]
#align is_localized_module.iso_symm_apply' IsLocalizedModule.iso_symm_apply'
theorem iso_symm_comp : (iso S f).symm.toLinearMap.comp f = LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap S M := by
ext m
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, iso_symm_apply']
exact one_smul _ _
#align is_localized_module.iso_symm_comp IsLocalizedModule.iso_symm_comp
/--
If `M'` is a localized module and `g` is a linear map `M' → M''` such that all scalar multiplication
by `s : S` is invertible, then there is a linear map `M' → M''`.
-/
noncomputable def lift (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
(h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) : M' →ₗ[R] M'' :=
(LocalizedModule.lift S g h).comp (iso S f).symm.toLinearMap
#align is_localized_module.lift IsLocalizedModule.lift
theorem lift_comp (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) :
(lift S f g h).comp f = g := by
dsimp only [IsLocalizedModule.lift]
rw [LinearMap.comp_assoc, iso_symm_comp, LocalizedModule.lift_comp S g h]
#align is_localized_module.lift_comp IsLocalizedModule.lift_comp
@[simp]
theorem lift_apply (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h) (x) :
lift S f g h (f x) = g x := LinearMap.congr_fun (lift_comp S f g h) x
theorem lift_unique (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(l : M' →ₗ[R] M'') (hl : l.comp f = g) : lift S f g h = l := by
dsimp only [IsLocalizedModule.lift]
rw [LocalizedModule.lift_unique S g h (l.comp (iso S f).toLinearMap), LinearMap.comp_assoc,
LinearEquiv.comp_coe, LinearEquiv.symm_trans_self, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap,
LinearMap.comp_id]
rw [LinearMap.comp_assoc, ← hl]
congr 1
ext x
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, iso_apply,
fromLocalizedModule'_mk, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, OneMemClass.coe_one,
one_smul]
#align is_localized_module.lift_unique IsLocalizedModule.lift_unique
/-- Universal property from localized module:
If `(M', f : M ⟶ M')` is a localized module then it satisfies the following universal property:
For every `R`-module `M''` which every `s : S`-scalar multiplication is invertible and for every
`R`-linear map `g : M ⟶ M''`, there is a unique `R`-linear map `l : M' ⟶ M''` such that
`l ∘ f = g`.
```
M -----f----> M'
| /
|g /
| / l
v /
M''
```
-/
theorem is_universal :
∀ (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (_ : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)),
∃! l : M' →ₗ[R] M'', l.comp f = g :=
fun g h => ⟨lift S f g h, lift_comp S f g h, fun l hl => (lift_unique S f g h l hl).symm⟩
#align is_localized_module.is_universal IsLocalizedModule.is_universal
theorem ringHom_ext (map_unit : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
⦃j k : M' →ₗ[R] M''⦄ (h : j.comp f = k.comp f) : j = k := by
rw [← lift_unique S f (k.comp f) map_unit j h, lift_unique]
rfl
#align is_localized_module.ring_hom_ext IsLocalizedModule.ringHom_ext
/-- If `(M', f)` and `(M'', g)` both satisfy universal property of localized module, then `M', M''`
are isomorphic as `R`-module
-/
noncomputable def linearEquiv [IsLocalizedModule S g] : M' ≃ₗ[R] M'' :=
(iso S f).symm.trans (iso S g)
#align is_localized_module.linear_equiv IsLocalizedModule.linearEquiv
variable {S}
theorem smul_injective (s : S) : Function.Injective fun m : M' => s • m :=
((Module.End_isUnit_iff _).mp (IsLocalizedModule.map_units f s)).injective
#align is_localized_module.smul_injective IsLocalizedModule.smul_injective
theorem smul_inj (s : S) (m₁ m₂ : M') : s • m₁ = s • m₂ ↔ m₁ = m₂ :=
(smul_injective f s).eq_iff
#align is_localized_module.smul_inj IsLocalizedModule.smul_inj
/-- `mk' f m s` is the fraction `m/s` with respect to the localization map `f`. -/
noncomputable def mk' (m : M) (s : S) : M' :=
fromLocalizedModule S f (LocalizedModule.mk m s)
#align is_localized_module.mk' IsLocalizedModule.mk'
theorem mk'_smul (r : R) (m : M) (s : S) : mk' f (r • m) s = r • mk' f m s := by
delta mk'
rw [← LocalizedModule.smul'_mk, LinearMap.map_smul]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_smul IsLocalizedModule.mk'_smul
theorem mk'_add_mk' (m₁ m₂ : M) (s₁ s₂ : S) :
mk' f m₁ s₁ + mk' f m₂ s₂ = mk' f (s₂ • m₁ + s₁ • m₂) (s₁ * s₂) := by
delta mk'
rw [← map_add, LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_add_mk' IsLocalizedModule.mk'_add_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_zero (s : S) : mk' f 0 s = 0 := by rw [← zero_smul R (0 : M), mk'_smul, zero_smul]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_zero IsLocalizedModule.mk'_zero
variable (S)
@[simp]
theorem mk'_one (m : M) : mk' f m (1 : S) = f m := by
delta mk'
rw [fromLocalizedModule_mk, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, Submonoid.coe_one,
one_smul]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_one IsLocalizedModule.mk'_one
variable {S}
@[simp]
theorem mk'_cancel (m : M) (s : S) : mk' f (s • m) s = f m := by
delta mk'
rw [LocalizedModule.mk_cancel, ← mk'_one S f, fromLocalizedModule_mk,
Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, OneMemClass.coe_one, mk'_one, one_smul]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_cancel IsLocalizedModule.mk'_cancel
@[simp]
theorem mk'_cancel' (m : M) (s : S) : s • mk' f m s = f m := by
rw [Submonoid.smul_def, ← mk'_smul, ← Submonoid.smul_def, mk'_cancel]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_cancel' IsLocalizedModule.mk'_cancel'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_cancel_left (m : M) (s₁ s₂ : S) : mk' f (s₁ • m) (s₁ * s₂) = mk' f m s₂ := by
delta mk'
rw [LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_left]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_cancel_left IsLocalizedModule.mk'_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem mk'_cancel_right (m : M) (s₁ s₂ : S) : mk' f (s₂ • m) (s₁ * s₂) = mk' f m s₁ := by
delta mk'
rw [LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_right]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_cancel_right IsLocalizedModule.mk'_cancel_right
theorem mk'_add (m₁ m₂ : M) (s : S) : mk' f (m₁ + m₂) s = mk' f m₁ s + mk' f m₂ s := by
rw [mk'_add_mk', ← smul_add, mk'_cancel_left]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_add IsLocalizedModule.mk'_add
theorem mk'_eq_mk'_iff (m₁ m₂ : M) (s₁ s₂ : S) :
mk' f m₁ s₁ = mk' f m₂ s₂ ↔ ∃ s : S, s • s₁ • m₂ = s • s₂ • m₁ := by
delta mk'
rw [(fromLocalizedModule.inj S f).eq_iff, LocalizedModule.mk_eq]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_eq_mk'_iff IsLocalizedModule.mk'_eq_mk'_iff
theorem mk'_neg {M M' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M] [Module R M']
(f : M →ₗ[R] M') [IsLocalizedModule S f] (m : M) (s : S) : mk' f (-m) s = -mk' f m s := by
delta mk'
rw [LocalizedModule.mk_neg, map_neg]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_neg IsLocalizedModule.mk'_neg
theorem mk'_sub {M M' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M] [Module R M']
(f : M →ₗ[R] M') [IsLocalizedModule S f] (m₁ m₂ : M) (s : S) :
mk' f (m₁ - m₂) s = mk' f m₁ s - mk' f m₂ s := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, mk'_add, mk'_neg]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_sub IsLocalizedModule.mk'_sub
theorem mk'_sub_mk' {M M' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M] [Module R M']
(f : M →ₗ[R] M') [IsLocalizedModule S f] (m₁ m₂ : M) (s₁ s₂ : S) :
mk' f m₁ s₁ - mk' f m₂ s₂ = mk' f (s₂ • m₁ - s₁ • m₂) (s₁ * s₂) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← mk'_neg, mk'_add_mk', smul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_sub_mk' IsLocalizedModule.mk'_sub_mk'
theorem mk'_mul_mk'_of_map_mul {M M' : Type*} [Semiring M] [Semiring M'] [Module R M]
[Algebra R M'] (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (hf : ∀ m₁ m₂, f (m₁ * m₂) = f m₁ * f m₂)
[IsLocalizedModule S f] (m₁ m₂ : M) (s₁ s₂ : S) :
mk' f m₁ s₁ * mk' f m₂ s₂ = mk' f (m₁ * m₂) (s₁ * s₂) := by
symm
apply (Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff _ _ _ _).mpr
simp_rw [Submonoid.coe_mul, ← smul_eq_mul]
rw [smul_smul_smul_comm, ← mk'_smul, ← mk'_smul]
simp_rw [← Submonoid.smul_def, mk'_cancel, smul_eq_mul, hf]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_mul_mk'_of_map_mul IsLocalizedModule.mk'_mul_mk'_of_map_mul
theorem mk'_mul_mk' {M M' : Type*} [Semiring M] [Semiring M'] [Algebra R M] [Algebra R M']
(f : M →ₐ[R] M') [IsLocalizedModule S f.toLinearMap] (m₁ m₂ : M) (s₁ s₂ : S) :
mk' f.toLinearMap m₁ s₁ * mk' f.toLinearMap m₂ s₂ = mk' f.toLinearMap (m₁ * m₂) (s₁ * s₂) :=
mk'_mul_mk'_of_map_mul f.toLinearMap f.map_mul m₁ m₂ s₁ s₂
#align is_localized_module.mk'_mul_mk' IsLocalizedModule.mk'_mul_mk'
variable {f}
/-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[simp] -/
theorem mk'_eq_iff {m : M} {s : S} {m' : M'} : mk' f m s = m' ↔ f m = s • m' := by
rw [← smul_inj f s, Submonoid.smul_def, ← mk'_smul, ← Submonoid.smul_def, mk'_cancel]
#align is_localized_module.mk'_eq_iff IsLocalizedModule.mk'_eq_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/LocalizedModule.lean | 1,073 | 1,073 | theorem mk'_eq_zero {m : M} (s : S) : mk' f m s = 0 ↔ f m = 0 := by | rw [mk'_eq_iff, smul_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monomial
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.WithBot
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.definitions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"808ea4ebfabeb599f21ec4ae87d6dc969597887f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The definitions include
`degree`, `Monic`, `leadingCoeff`
Results include
- `degree_mul` : The degree of the product is the sum of degrees
- `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq` and `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt` :
The leading_coefficient of a sum is determined by the leading coefficients and degrees
-/
-- Porting note: `Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop` should be imported for `Nat.cast_withBot`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
#align polynomial.degree Polynomial.degree
theorem supDegree_eq_degree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree WithBot.some = p.degree :=
max_eq_sup_coe
theorem degree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => degree p < degree q :=
InvImage.wf degree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.degree_lt_wf Polynomial.degree_lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation R[X] :=
⟨_, degree_lt_wf⟩
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbot' 0
#align polynomial.nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`-/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
#align polynomial.leading_coeff Polynomial.leadingCoeff
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.monic Polynomial.Monic
@[nontriviality]
theorem monic_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : R[X]) : Monic p :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton Polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.monic.def Polynomial.Monic.def
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
#align polynomial.monic.decidable Polynomial.Monic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.leading_coeff Polynomial.Monic.leadingCoeff
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.Monic.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_zero Polynomial.degree_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_zero Polynomial.natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align polynomial.degree_eq_bot Polynomial.degree_eq_bot
@[nontriviality]
theorem degree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, degree_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem natDegree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : natDegree p = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, natDegree_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.natDegree_of_subsingleton
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
#align polynomial.degree_eq_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree
theorem supDegree_eq_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree id = p.natDegree := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
apply WithBot.coe_injective
rw [← AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_withBot_some_comp, Function.comp_id, supDegree_eq_degree,
degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_withBot]
rwa [support_toFinsupp, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, support_eq_empty]
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_withBot` is required.
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbot'_coe]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
#align polynomial.degree_ne_of_nat_degree_ne Polynomial.degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.le_u_l _
#align polynomial.degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : n ≤ natDegree p := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree]
· exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
· rintro rfl
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → a ≤ natDegree p :=
le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_mem_supp
theorem degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.degree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.degree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_degree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) :
p.natDegree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
#align polynomial.degree_mono Polynomial.degree_mono
theorem supp_subset_range (h : natDegree p < m) : p.support ⊆ Finset.range m := fun _n hn =>
mem_range.2 <| (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hn).trans_lt h
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range Polynomial.supp_subset_range
theorem supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ : p.support ⊆ Finset.range (natDegree p + 1) :=
supp_subset_range (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range_nat_degree_succ Polynomial.supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.degree_le_degree Polynomial.degree_le_degree
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbot'_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbot'_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_iff_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
#align polynomial.degree_le_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.degree_le_of_natDegree_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.monotone_l hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_lt_natDegree {p q : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (hpq : p.degree < q.degree) :
p.natDegree < q.natDegree := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· exact (not_lt_bot <| hq ▸ hpq).elim
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq, Nat.cast_lt] at hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_lt_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_C Polynomial.degree_C
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
#align polynomial.degree_C_le Polynomial.degree_C_le
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
#align polynomial.degree_C_lt Polynomial.degree_C_lt
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
#align polynomial.degree_one_le Polynomial.degree_one_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbot'_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbot_zero']
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C Polynomial.natDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
#align polynomial.nat_degree_one Polynomial.natDegree_one
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_nat_cast Polynomial.natDegree_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natDegree_nat_cast := natDegree_natCast
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias degree_nat_cast_le := degree_natCast_le
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
#align polynomial.degree_monomial Polynomial.degree_monomial
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
#align polynomial.degree_monomial_le Polynomial.degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow_le Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_le Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial Polynomial.natDegree_monomial
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial_le Polynomial.natDegree_monomial_le
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial_eq Polynomial.natDegree_monomial_eq
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < n) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt le_degree_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : p.natDegree < n) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
by_cases hp : p = 0
· subst hp
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe n
· rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt
theorem ext_iff_natDegree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p.natDegree ≤ n) (hq : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
p = q ↔ ∀ i ≤ n, p.coeff i = q.coeff i := by
refine Iff.trans Polynomial.ext_iff ?_
refine forall_congr' fun i => ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => ?_⟩
refine (le_or_lt i n).elim h fun k => ?_
exact
(coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hp.trans_lt k)).trans
(coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hq.trans_lt k)).symm
#align polynomial.ext_iff_nat_degree_le Polynomial.ext_iff_natDegree_le
theorem ext_iff_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p.degree ≤ n) (hq : q.degree ≤ n) :
p = q ↔ ∀ i ≤ n, p.coeff i = q.coeff i :=
ext_iff_natDegree_le (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hp) (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hq)
#align polynomial.ext_iff_degree_le Polynomial.ext_iff_degree_le
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree_succ_eq_zero {p : R[X]} : p.coeff (p.natDegree + 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_add_one _)
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree_succ_eq_zero Polynomial.coeff_natDegree_succ_eq_zero
-- We need the explicit `Decidable` argument here because an exotic one shows up in a moment!
theorem ite_le_natDegree_coeff (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (I : Decidable (n < 1 + natDegree p)) :
@ite _ (n < 1 + natDegree p) I (coeff p n) 0 = coeff p n := by
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· exact (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (not_le.1 fun w => h (Nat.lt_one_add_iff.2 w))).symm
#align polynomial.ite_le_nat_degree_coeff Polynomial.ite_le_natDegree_coeff
theorem as_sum_support (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i) :=
(sum_monomial_eq p).symm
#align polynomial.as_sum_support Polynomial.as_sum_support
theorem as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ p.support, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i :=
_root_.trans p.as_sum_support <| by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
#align polynomial.as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow
/-- We can reexpress a sum over `p.support` as a sum over `range n`,
for any `n` satisfying `p.natDegree < n`.
-/
theorem sum_over_range' [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0) (n : ℕ)
(w : p.natDegree < n) : p.sum f = ∑ a ∈ range n, f a (coeff p a) := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
have := supp_subset_range w
simp only [Polynomial.sum, support, coeff, natDegree, degree] at this ⊢
exact Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ this _ fun n _hn => h n
#align polynomial.sum_over_range' Polynomial.sum_over_range'
/-- We can reexpress a sum over `p.support` as a sum over `range (p.natDegree + 1)`.
-/
theorem sum_over_range [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0) :
p.sum f = ∑ a ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), f a (coeff p a) :=
sum_over_range' p h (p.natDegree + 1) (lt_add_one _)
#align polynomial.sum_over_range Polynomial.sum_over_range
-- TODO this is essentially a duplicate of `sum_over_range`, and should be removed.
theorem sum_fin [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]}
(hn : p.degree < n) : (∑ i : Fin n, f i (p.coeff i)) = p.sum f := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, sum_zero_index, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro i _
exact hf i
rw [sum_over_range' _ hf n ((natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt hp).mpr hn),
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range fun i => f i (p.coeff i)]
#align polynomial.sum_fin Polynomial.sum_fin
theorem as_sum_range' (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (w : p.natDegree < n) :
p = ∑ i ∈ range n, monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_monomial_eq.symm.trans <| p.sum_over_range' monomial_zero_right _ w
#align polynomial.as_sum_range' Polynomial.as_sum_range'
theorem as_sum_range (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_monomial_eq.symm.trans <| p.sum_over_range <| monomial_zero_right
#align polynomial.as_sum_range Polynomial.as_sum_range
theorem as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) :
p = ∑ i ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), C (coeff p i) * X ^ i :=
p.as_sum_range.trans <| by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
#align polynomial.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
#align polynomial.coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree Polynomial.coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (h : degree p ≤ 1) : p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
ext fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (by simp) fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (by simp [coeff_C]) fun m => by
-- Porting note: `by decide` → `Iff.mpr ..`
have : degree p < m.succ.succ := lt_of_le_of_lt h
(Iff.mpr WithBot.coe_lt_coe <| Nat.succ_lt_succ <| Nat.zero_lt_succ m)
simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt this, coeff_C, Nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_X, Nat.succ_inj',
@eq_comm ℕ 0]
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) :
p = C p.leadingCoeff * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
(eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one h.le).trans
(by rw [← Nat.cast_one] at h; rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some h])
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (h : natDegree p ≤ 1) :
p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one <| degree_le_of_natDegree_le h
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_nat_degree_le_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem Monic.eq_X_add_C (hm : p.Monic) (hnd : p.natDegree = 1) : p = X + C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← one_mul X, ← C_1, ← hm.coeff_natDegree, hnd, ← eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one hnd.le]
#align polynomial.monic.eq_X_add_C Polynomial.Monic.eq_X_add_C
theorem exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (h : natDegree p ≤ 1) : ∃ a b, p = C a * X + C b :=
⟨p.coeff 1, p.coeff 0, eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one h⟩
#align polynomial.exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one Polynomial.exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
#align polynomial.degree_X_pow_le Polynomial.degree_X_pow_le
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
#align polynomial.degree_X_le Polynomial.degree_X_le
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_le Polynomial.natDegree_X_le
theorem mem_support_C_mul_X_pow {n a : ℕ} {c : R} (h : a ∈ support (C c * X ^ n)) : a = n :=
mem_singleton.1 <| support_C_mul_X_pow' n c h
#align polynomial.mem_support_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.mem_support_C_mul_X_pow
theorem card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one {c : R} {n : ℕ} : card (support (C c * X ^ n)) ≤ 1 := by
rw [← card_singleton n]
apply card_le_card (support_C_mul_X_pow' n c)
#align polynomial.card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one Polynomial.card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
theorem card_supp_le_succ_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.support.card ≤ p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [← Finset.card_range (p.natDegree + 1)]
exact Finset.card_le_card supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ
#align polynomial.card_supp_le_succ_nat_degree Polynomial.card_supp_le_succ_natDegree
theorem le_degree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → ↑a ≤ degree p :=
le_degree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.le_degree_of_mem_supp Polynomial.le_degree_of_mem_supp
theorem nonempty_support_iff : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← support_eq_empty]
#align polynomial.nonempty_support_iff Polynomial.nonempty_support_iff
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.degree_one Polynomial.degree_one
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.degree_X Polynomial.degree_X
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X Polynomial.natDegree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
theorem coeff_mul_X_sub_C {p : R[X]} {r : R} {a : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (X - C r)) (a + 1) = coeff p a - coeff p (a + 1) * r := by simp [mul_sub]
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_X_sub_C Polynomial.coeff_mul_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
#align polynomial.degree_neg Polynomial.degree_neg
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_neg Polynomial.natDegree_neg
theorem natDegree_neg_le_of_le {p : R[X]} (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) : natDegree (-p) ≤ m :=
(natDegree_neg p).le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast, natDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_intCast Polynomial.natDegree_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natDegree_int_cast := natDegree_intCast
theorem degree_intCast_le (n : ℤ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias degree_int_cast_le := degree_intCast_le
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).leadingCoeff = -p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_neg, coeff_neg]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_neg Polynomial.leadingCoeff_neg
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1)
#align polynomial.next_coeff Polynomial.nextCoeff
lemma nextCoeff_eq_zero :
p.nextCoeff = 0 ↔ p.natDegree = 0 ∨ 0 < p.natDegree ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) = 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff, or_iff_not_imp_left, pos_iff_ne_zero]; aesop
lemma nextCoeff_ne_zero : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) ≠ 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeff (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeff]
simp
#align polynomial.next_coeff_C_eq_zero Polynomial.nextCoeff_C_eq_zero
theorem nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos (hp : 0 < p.natDegree) :
nextCoeff p = p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) := by
rw [nextCoeff, if_neg]
contrapose! hp
simpa
#align polynomial.next_coeff_of_pos_nat_degree Polynomial.nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos
variable {p q : R[X]} {ι : Type*}
theorem coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) :
coeff p (natDegree q) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le h degree_le_natDegree)
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem ne_zero_of_degree_gt {n : WithBot ℕ} (h : n < degree p) : p ≠ 0 :=
mt degree_eq_bot.2 h.ne_bot
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_gt Polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_gt
theorem ne_zero_of_degree_ge_degree (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) (hp : p ≠ 0) : q ≠ 0 :=
Polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_gt
(lt_of_lt_of_le (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr (by rwa [Ne, Polynomial.degree_eq_bot])) hpq :
q.degree > ⊥)
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_ge_degree Polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_ge_degree
theorem ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt {n : ℕ} (h : n < natDegree p) : p ≠ 0 := fun H => by
simp [H, Nat.not_lt_zero] at h
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_nat_degree_gt Polynomial.ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt
theorem degree_lt_degree (h : natDegree p < natDegree q) : degree p < degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
intro hq
simp [hp, degree_eq_bot.mp hq, lt_irrefl] at h
· rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree <| ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt h, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.degree_lt_degree Polynomial.degree_lt_degree
theorem natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree p < natDegree q ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨degree_lt_degree, fun h ↦ by
have hq : q ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_degree_gt h
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq, Nat.cast_lt] at h⟩
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_nat_degree_iff Polynomial.natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff
theorem eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (h : degree p ≤ 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp
rw [coeff_C, if_neg (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt]
exact h.trans_lt (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 n.succ_pos)
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_le_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_le_zero
theorem eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (h : degree p = 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h.le
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero
theorem degree_le_zero_iff : degree p ≤ 0 ↔ p = C (coeff p 0) :=
⟨eq_C_of_degree_le_zero, fun h => h.symm ▸ degree_C_le⟩
#align polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff
theorem degree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_add]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_add_le _ _ _
#align polynomial.degree_add_le Polynomial.degree_add_le
theorem degree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ n) (hq : degree q ≤ n) :
degree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(degree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
#align polynomial.degree_add_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.degree_add_le_of_degree_le
theorem degree_add_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p + q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
cases' le_max_iff.1 (degree_add_le p q) with h h <;> simp [natDegree_le_natDegree h]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le Polynomial.natDegree_add_le
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : natDegree p ≤ n)
(hq : natDegree q ≤ n) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(natDegree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p + q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_natDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_zero : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_ne_zero
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [leadingCoeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot
lemma natDegree_le_pred (hf : p.natDegree ≤ n) (hn : p.coeff n = 0) : p.natDegree ≤ n - 1 := by
obtain _ | n := n
· exact hf
· refine (Nat.le_succ_iff_eq_or_le.1 hf).resolve_left fun h ↦ ?_
rw [← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← h, coeff_natDegree, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at hn
aesop
theorem natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero (H : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree ∈ p.support := by
rw [mem_support_iff]
exact (not_congr leadingCoeff_eq_zero).mpr H
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mem_support_of_nonzero Polynomial.natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero
theorem natDegree_eq_support_max' (h : p ≠ 0) :
p.natDegree = p.support.max' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) :=
(le_max' _ _ <| natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h).antisymm <|
max'_le _ _ _ le_natDegree_of_mem_supp
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_support_max' Polynomial.natDegree_eq_support_max'
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow_le Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le
theorem degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt (h : degree q < degree p) : degree (p + q) = degree p :=
le_antisymm (max_eq_left_of_lt h ▸ degree_add_le _ _) <|
degree_le_degree <| by
rw [coeff_add, coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt h, add_zero]
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 (ne_zero_of_degree_gt h)
#align polynomial.degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt
theorem degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) : degree (p + q) = degree q := by
rw [add_comm, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt h]
#align polynomial.degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt
theorem natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
natDegree (p + q) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_eq_left_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt
theorem natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree p < natDegree q) :
natDegree (p + q) = natDegree q :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_eq_right_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt
theorem degree_add_C (hp : 0 < degree p) : degree (p + C a) = degree p :=
add_comm (C a) p ▸ degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le hp
#align polynomial.degree_add_C Polynomial.degree_add_C
@[simp] theorem natDegree_add_C {a : R} : (p + C a).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with rfl | hp
· simp
by_cases hpd : p.degree ≤ 0
· rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hpd, ← C_add, natDegree_C, natDegree_C]
· rw [not_le, degree_eq_natDegree hp, Nat.cast_pos, ← natDegree_C a] at hpd
exact natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt hpd
@[simp] theorem natDegree_C_add {a : R} : (C a + p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [add_comm _ p]
theorem degree_add_eq_of_leadingCoeff_add_ne_zero (h : leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
degree (p + q) = max p.degree q.degree :=
le_antisymm (degree_add_le _ _) <|
match lt_trichotomy (degree p) (degree q) with
| Or.inl hlt => by
rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt hlt, max_eq_right_of_lt hlt]
| Or.inr (Or.inl HEq) =>
le_of_not_gt fun hlt : max (degree p) (degree q) > degree (p + q) =>
h <|
show leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q = 0 by
rw [HEq, max_self] at hlt
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq HEq, ← coeff_add]
exact coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt hlt
| Or.inr (Or.inr hlt) => by
rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt hlt, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
#align polynomial.degree_add_eq_of_leading_coeff_add_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_add_eq_of_leadingCoeff_add_ne_zero
lemma natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_left (p q : R[X])
(H : natDegree (p + q) < natDegree p) : natDegree p = natDegree q := by
by_contra h
cases Nat.lt_or_lt_of_ne h with
| inl h => exact lt_asymm h (by rwa [natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt h] at H)
| inr h =>
rw [natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt h] at H
exact LT.lt.false H
lemma natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_right (p q : R[X])
(H : natDegree (p + q) < natDegree q) : natDegree p = natDegree q :=
(natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_left q p (add_comm p q ▸ H)).symm
lemma natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_eq_zero (p q : R[X])
(H : natDegree (p + q) = 0) : natDegree p = natDegree q := by
by_cases h₁ : natDegree p = 0; on_goal 1 => by_cases h₂ : natDegree q = 0
· exact h₁.trans h₂.symm
· apply natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_right; rwa [H, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
· apply natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_left; rwa [H, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem degree_erase_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp only [erase_def, degree, coeff, support]
-- Porting note: simpler convert-free proof to be explicit about definition unfolding
apply sup_mono
rw [Finsupp.support_erase]
apply Finset.erase_subset
#align polynomial.degree_erase_le Polynomial.degree_erase_le
theorem degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (natDegree p)) < degree p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree, support_erase]
exact fun h => not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h)
#align polynomial.degree_erase_lt Polynomial.degree_erase_lt
theorem degree_update_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (p.update n a) ≤ max (degree p) n := by
classical
rw [degree, support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (Finset.max_mono (erase_subset _ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
· rw [max_insert, max_comm]
exact le_rfl
#align polynomial.degree_update_le Polynomial.degree_update_le
theorem degree_sum_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.sup fun b => degree (f b) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (by simp only [sum_empty, sup_empty, degree_zero, le_refl])
fun a s has ih =>
calc
degree (∑ i ∈ cons a s has, f i) ≤ max (degree (f a)) (degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i)) := by
rw [Finset.sum_cons]; exact degree_add_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [sup_cons, sup_eq_max]; exact max_le_max le_rfl ih
#align polynomial.degree_sum_le Polynomial.degree_sum_le
theorem degree_mul_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p * q) ≤ degree p + degree q := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_mul_le (WithBot.coe_add _ _).le _ _
#align polynomial.degree_mul_le Polynomial.degree_mul_le
theorem degree_mul_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p * q) ≤ a + b :=
(p.degree_mul_le _).trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_pow_le (p : R[X]) : ∀ n : ℕ, degree (p ^ n) ≤ n • degree p
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]; exact degree_one_le
| n + 1 =>
calc
degree (p ^ (n + 1)) ≤ degree (p ^ n) + degree p := by
rw [pow_succ]; exact degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [succ_nsmul]; exact add_le_add_right (degree_pow_le _ _) _
#align polynomial.degree_pow_le Polynomial.degree_pow_le
theorem degree_pow_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} (b : ℕ) (hp : degree p ≤ a) :
degree (p ^ b) ≤ b * a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp [degree_one_le]
| succ n hn =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ]
exact degree_mul_le_of_le hn hp
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (monomial n a) = a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, (monomial n).map_zero, leadingCoeff_zero]
· rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_monomial, if_neg ha, coeff_monomial]
simp
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_monomial Polynomial.leadingCoeff_monomial
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ n) = a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, leadingCoeff_monomial]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a * X) = a := by
simpa only [pow_one] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow a 1
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_C_mul_X Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_C (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a) = a :=
leadingCoeff_monomial a 0
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_C Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = 1 := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X_pow Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_X : leadingCoeff (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @leadingCoeff_X_pow R _ 1
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X
@[simp]
theorem monic_X_pow (n : ℕ) : Monic (X ^ n : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow n
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow Polynomial.monic_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem monic_X : Monic (X : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X
#align polynomial.monic_X Polynomial.monic_X
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_one : leadingCoeff (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_C 1
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_one Polynomial.leadingCoeff_one
@[simp]
theorem monic_one : Monic (1 : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_C _
#align polynomial.monic_one Polynomial.monic_one
theorem Monic.ne_zero {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [Monic] at hp
#align polynomial.monic.ne_zero Polynomial.Monic.ne_zero
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_ne (h : (0 : R) ≠ 1) {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
exact hp.ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.ne_zero_of_ne Polynomial.Monic.ne_zero_of_ne
theorem monic_of_natDegree_le_of_coeff_eq_one (n : ℕ) (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n = 1) :
Monic p := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
refine (congr_arg _ <| natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero pn ?_).trans p1
exact ne_of_eq_of_ne p1 one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic_of_nat_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one Polynomial.monic_of_natDegree_le_of_coeff_eq_one
theorem monic_of_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one (n : ℕ) (pn : p.degree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n = 1) :
Monic p :=
monic_of_natDegree_le_of_coeff_eq_one n (natDegree_le_of_degree_le pn) p1
#align polynomial.monic_of_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one Polynomial.monic_of_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne {r} (hp : Monic p) (hne : q ≠ r) : p ≠ 0 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hne
hp.ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne Polynomial.Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne
theorem leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) :
leadingCoeff (p + q) = leadingCoeff q := by
have : coeff p (natDegree q) = 0 := coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt h
simp only [leadingCoeff, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt h), this,
coeff_add, zero_add]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_add_of_degree_lt Polynomial.leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt
theorem leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt' (h : degree q < degree p) :
leadingCoeff (p + q) = leadingCoeff p := by
rw [add_comm]
exact leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt h
theorem leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq (h : degree p = degree q)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (p + q) = leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q := by
have : natDegree (p + q) = natDegree p := by
apply natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq
rw [degree_add_eq_of_leadingCoeff_add_ne_zero hlc, h, max_self]
simp only [leadingCoeff, this, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq h, coeff_add]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_add_of_degree_eq Polynomial.leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_degree_add_degree (p q : R[X]) :
coeff (p * q) (natDegree p + natDegree q) = leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q :=
calc
coeff (p * q) (natDegree p + natDegree q) =
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal (natDegree p + natDegree q), coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 :=
coeff_mul _ _ _
_ = coeff p (natDegree p) * coeff q (natDegree q) := by
refine Finset.sum_eq_single (natDegree p, natDegree q) ?_ ?_
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h₁ h₂
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at h₁
by_cases H : natDegree p < i
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_natDegree (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 H)),
zero_mul]
· rw [not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt] at H
cases' H with H H
· subst H
rw [add_left_cancel_iff] at h₁
dsimp at h₁
subst h₁
exact (h₂ rfl).elim
· suffices natDegree q < j by
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_natDegree (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 this)),
mul_zero]
by_contra! H'
exact
ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add_right H j) (Nat.add_le_add_left H' _))
h₁
· intro H
exfalso
apply H
rw [mem_antidiagonal]
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_degree_add_degree Polynomial.coeff_mul_degree_add_degree
theorem degree_mul' (h : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
degree (p * q) = degree p + degree q :=
have hp : p ≠ 0 := by refine mt ?_ h; exact fun hp => by rw [hp, leadingCoeff_zero, zero_mul]
have hq : q ≠ 0 := by refine mt ?_ h; exact fun hq => by rw [hq, leadingCoeff_zero, mul_zero]
le_antisymm (degree_mul_le _ _)
(by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero (n := natDegree p + natDegree q) ?_
rwa [coeff_mul_degree_add_degree])
#align polynomial.degree_mul' Polynomial.degree_mul'
theorem Monic.degree_mul (hq : Monic q) : degree (p * q) = degree p + degree q :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hp : p = 0 then by simp [hp]
else degree_mul' <| by rwa [hq.leadingCoeff, mul_one, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.degree_mul Polynomial.Monic.degree_mul
theorem natDegree_mul' (h : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
natDegree (p * q) = natDegree p + natDegree q :=
have hp : p ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.2 fun h₁ => h <| by rw [h₁, zero_mul]
have hq : q ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.2 fun h₁ => h <| by rw [h₁, mul_zero]
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some <| by
rw [degree_mul' h, Nat.cast_add, degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul' Polynomial.natDegree_mul'
theorem leadingCoeff_mul' (h : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (p * q) = leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [natDegree_mul' h, coeff_mul_degree_add_degree]
rfl
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul' Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul'
theorem monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff_eq_self (h : p.support.card ≤ 1) :
monomial p.natDegree p.leadingCoeff = p := by
classical
rcases card_support_le_one_iff_monomial.1 h with ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> simp [ha]
#align polynomial.monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff_eq_self Polynomial.monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff_eq_self
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_self (h : p.support.card ≤ 1) : C p.leadingCoeff * X ^ p.natDegree = p := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff_eq_self h]
#align polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_self
theorem leadingCoeff_pow' : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 → leadingCoeff (p ^ n) = leadingCoeff p ^ n :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp) fun n ih h => by
have h₁ : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 := fun h₁ => h <| by rw [pow_succ, h₁, zero_mul]
have h₂ : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff (p ^ n) ≠ 0 := by rwa [pow_succ', ← ih h₁] at h
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', leadingCoeff_mul' h₂, ih h₁]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_pow' Polynomial.leadingCoeff_pow'
theorem degree_pow' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 → degree (p ^ n) = n • degree p
| 0 => fun h => by rw [pow_zero, ← C_1] at *; rw [degree_C h, zero_nsmul]
| n + 1 => fun h => by
have h₁ : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 := fun h₁ => h <| by rw [pow_succ, h₁, zero_mul]
have h₂ : leadingCoeff (p ^ n) * leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 := by
rwa [pow_succ, ← leadingCoeff_pow' h₁] at h
rw [pow_succ, degree_mul' h₂, succ_nsmul, degree_pow' h₁]
#align polynomial.degree_pow' Polynomial.degree_pow'
theorem natDegree_pow' {n : ℕ} (h : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0) : natDegree (p ^ n) = n * natDegree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hp0 : p = 0 then
if hn0 : n = 0 then by simp [*] else by rw [hp0, zero_pow hn0]; simp
else
have hpn : p ^ n ≠ 0 := fun hpn0 => by
have h1 := h
rw [← leadingCoeff_pow' h1, hpn0, leadingCoeff_zero] at h; exact h rfl
Option.some_inj.1 <|
show (natDegree (p ^ n) : WithBot ℕ) = (n * natDegree p : ℕ) by
rw [← degree_eq_natDegree hpn, degree_pow' h, degree_eq_natDegree hp0]; simp
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow' Polynomial.natDegree_pow'
theorem leadingCoeff_monic_mul {p q : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) :
leadingCoeff (p * q) = leadingCoeff q := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | H)
· simp
· rw [leadingCoeff_mul', hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul]
rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_monic_mul Polynomial.leadingCoeff_monic_mul
theorem leadingCoeff_mul_monic {p q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) :
leadingCoeff (p * q) = leadingCoeff p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : leadingCoeff p = 0 => by
rw [H, leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 H, zero_mul, leadingCoeff_zero])
fun H : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 => by
rw [leadingCoeff_mul', hq.leadingCoeff, mul_one]
rwa [hq.leadingCoeff, mul_one]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul_monic Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_monic
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : leadingCoeff (p * X ^ n) = leadingCoeff p :=
leadingCoeff_mul_monic (monic_X_pow n)
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul_X_pow Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_mul_X {p : R[X]} : leadingCoeff (p * X) = leadingCoeff p :=
leadingCoeff_mul_monic monic_X
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul_X Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_X
theorem natDegree_mul_le {p q : R[X]} : natDegree (p * q) ≤ natDegree p + natDegree q := by
apply natDegree_le_of_degree_le
apply le_trans (degree_mul_le p q)
rw [Nat.cast_add]
apply add_le_add <;> apply degree_le_natDegree
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_le Polynomial.natDegree_mul_le
theorem natDegree_mul_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hg : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p * q) ≤ m + n :=
natDegree_mul_le.trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_pow_le {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).natDegree ≤ n * p.natDegree := by
induction' n with i hi
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
apply le_trans natDegree_mul_le
exact add_le_add_right hi _
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow_le Polynomial.natDegree_pow_le
theorem natDegree_pow_le_of_le (n : ℕ) (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) :
natDegree (p ^ n) ≤ n * m :=
natDegree_pow_le.trans (Nat.mul_le_mul le_rfl ‹_›)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_pow_mul_natDegree (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).coeff (n * p.natDegree) = p.leadingCoeff ^ n := by
induction' n with i hi
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
by_cases hp1 : p.leadingCoeff ^ i = 0
· rw [hp1, zero_mul]
by_cases hp2 : p ^ i = 0
· rw [hp2, zero_mul, coeff_zero]
· apply coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt
have h1 : (p ^ i).natDegree < i * p.natDegree := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne natDegree_pow_le fun h => hp2 ?_
rw [← h, hp1] at hi
exact leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hi
calc
(p ^ i * p).natDegree ≤ (p ^ i).natDegree + p.natDegree := natDegree_mul_le
_ < i * p.natDegree + p.natDegree := add_lt_add_right h1 _
· rw [← natDegree_pow' hp1, ← leadingCoeff_pow' hp1]
exact coeff_mul_degree_add_degree _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_pow_mul_nat_degree Polynomial.coeff_pow_mul_natDegree
theorem coeff_mul_add_eq_of_natDegree_le {df dg : ℕ} {f g : R[X]}
(hdf : natDegree f ≤ df) (hdg : natDegree g ≤ dg) :
(f * g).coeff (df + dg) = f.coeff df * g.coeff dg := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (df, dg)]
· rw [mem_antidiagonal]
rintro ⟨df', dg'⟩ hmem hne
obtain h | hdf' := lt_or_le df df'
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hdf.trans_lt h), zero_mul]
obtain h | hdg' := lt_or_le dg dg'
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hdg.trans_lt h), mul_zero]
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ :=
(add_eq_add_iff_eq_and_eq hdf' hdg').mp (mem_antidiagonal.1 hmem)
exact (hne rfl).elim
theorem zero_le_degree_iff : 0 ≤ degree p ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_lt, Nat.WithBot.lt_zero_iff, degree_eq_bot]
#align polynomial.zero_le_degree_iff Polynomial.zero_le_degree_iff
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p.degree ≤ 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.cast_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero
theorem degree_zero_le : degree (0 : R[X]) ≤ 0 := natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp rfl
theorem degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : WithBot ℕ) :
degree f ≤ n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n < m → coeff f m = 0 := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_withBot` is required.
simp only [degree, Finset.max, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_support_iff, Ne, ← not_le,
not_imp_comm, Nat.cast_withBot]
#align polynomial.degree_le_iff_coeff_zero Polynomial.degree_le_iff_coeff_zero
theorem degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
degree f < n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe n), mem_support_iff,
WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← @not_le ℕ, max_eq_sup_coe, Nat.cast_withBot, Ne, not_imp_not]
#align polynomial.degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero Polynomial.degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero
theorem degree_smul_le (a : R) (p : R[X]) : degree (a • p) ≤ degree p := by
refine (degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun m hm => ?_
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
simp [hm m le_rfl]
#align polynomial.degree_smul_le Polynomial.degree_smul_le
theorem natDegree_smul_le (a : R) (p : R[X]) : natDegree (a • p) ≤ natDegree p :=
natDegree_le_natDegree (degree_smul_le a p)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_smul_le Polynomial.natDegree_smul_le
theorem degree_lt_degree_mul_X (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.degree < (p * X).degree := by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp
have : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff X ≠ 0 := by simpa
erw [degree_mul' this, degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_X, ← WithBot.coe_one,
← WithBot.coe_add, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align polynomial.degree_lt_degree_mul_X Polynomial.degree_lt_degree_mul_X
theorem natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos : 0 < natDegree p ↔ 0 < degree p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pos_iff_degree_pos Polynomial.natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos
theorem eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero (h : natDegree p ≤ 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_degree_le_zero <| degree_le_of_natDegree_le h
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_nat_degree_le_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero
theorem eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero (h : natDegree p = 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero h.le
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero
lemma natDegree_eq_zero {p : R[X]} : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ ∃ x, C x = p :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, (eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero h).symm⟩, by aesop⟩
theorem eq_C_coeff_zero_iff_natDegree_eq_zero : p = C (p.coeff 0) ↔ p.natDegree = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, natDegree_C], eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero⟩
theorem eq_one_of_monic_natDegree_zero (hf : p.Monic) (hfd : p.natDegree = 0) : p = 1 := by
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff, hfd] at hf
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hfd, hf, map_one]
theorem ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree (hdeg : ↑n ≤ p.degree) : p ≠ 0 :=
zero_le_degree_iff.mp <| (WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr n.zero_le).trans hdeg
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree Polynomial.ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree
theorem le_natDegree_of_coe_le_degree (hdeg : ↑n ≤ p.degree) : n ≤ p.natDegree :=
-- Porting note: `.. ▸ ..` → `rwa [..] at ..`
WithBot.coe_le_coe.mp <| by
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree <| ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree hdeg] at hdeg
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_coe_le_degree Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_coe_le_degree
theorem degree_sum_fin_lt {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → R) :
degree (∑ i : Fin n, C (f i) * X ^ (i : ℕ)) < n :=
(degree_sum_le _ _).trans_lt <|
(Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).2 fun k _hk =>
(degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _).trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 k.is_lt
#align polynomial.degree_sum_fin_lt Polynomial.degree_sum_fin_lt
theorem degree_linear_le : degree (C a * X + C b) ≤ 1 :=
degree_add_le_of_degree_le (degree_C_mul_X_le _) <| le_trans degree_C_le Nat.WithBot.coe_nonneg
#align polynomial.degree_linear_le Polynomial.degree_linear_le
theorem degree_linear_lt : degree (C a * X + C b) < 2 :=
degree_linear_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr one_lt_two
#align polynomial.degree_linear_lt Polynomial.degree_linear_lt
theorem degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C b) < degree (C a * X) := by
simpa only [degree_C_mul_X ha] using degree_C_lt
#align polynomial.degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem degree_linear (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X + C b) = 1 := by
rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X ha, degree_C_mul_X ha]
#align polynomial.degree_linear Polynomial.degree_linear
theorem natDegree_linear_le : natDegree (C a * X + C b) ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_linear_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_linear_le Polynomial.natDegree_linear_le
theorem natDegree_linear (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X + C b) = 1 := by
rw [natDegree_add_C, natDegree_C_mul_X a ha]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_linear Polynomial.natDegree_linear
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_linear (ha : a ≠ 0) : leadingCoeff (C a * X + C b) = a := by
rw [add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt (degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X ha),
leadingCoeff_C_mul_X]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_linear Polynomial.leadingCoeff_linear
theorem degree_quadratic_le : degree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [add_assoc] using
degree_add_le_of_degree_le (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 2 a)
(le_trans degree_linear_le <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr one_le_two)
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic_le Polynomial.degree_quadratic_le
theorem degree_quadratic_lt : degree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) < 3 :=
degree_quadratic_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr <| lt_add_one 2
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt Polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt
theorem degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degree (C b * X + C c) < degree (C a * X ^ 2) := by
simpa only [degree_C_mul_X_pow 2 ha] using degree_linear_lt
#align polynomial.degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq Polynomial.degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem degree_quadratic (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) = 2 := by
rw [add_assoc, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq ha,
degree_C_mul_X_pow 2 ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic Polynomial.degree_quadratic
theorem natDegree_quadratic_le : natDegree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) ≤ 2 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_quadratic_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_quadratic_le Polynomial.natDegree_quadratic_le
theorem natDegree_quadratic (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) = 2 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some <| degree_quadratic ha
#align polynomial.nat_degree_quadratic Polynomial.natDegree_quadratic
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_quadratic (ha : a ≠ 0) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) = a := by
rw [add_assoc, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt <| degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq ha,
leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_quadratic Polynomial.leadingCoeff_quadratic
theorem degree_cubic_le : degree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) ≤ 3 := by
simpa only [add_assoc] using
degree_add_le_of_degree_le (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 3 a)
(le_trans degree_quadratic_le <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr <| Nat.le_succ 2)
#align polynomial.degree_cubic_le Polynomial.degree_cubic_le
theorem degree_cubic_lt : degree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) < 4 :=
degree_cubic_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr <| lt_add_one 3
#align polynomial.degree_cubic_lt Polynomial.degree_cubic_lt
theorem degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degree (C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) < degree (C a * X ^ 3) := by
simpa only [degree_C_mul_X_pow 3 ha] using degree_quadratic_lt
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb Polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb
@[simp]
theorem degree_cubic (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) = 3 := by
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, ← add_assoc (C b * X ^ 2),
degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb ha,
degree_C_mul_X_pow 3 ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_cubic Polynomial.degree_cubic
theorem natDegree_cubic_le : natDegree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) ≤ 3 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_cubic_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_cubic_le Polynomial.natDegree_cubic_le
theorem natDegree_cubic (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) = 3 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some <| degree_cubic ha
#align polynomial.nat_degree_cubic Polynomial.natDegree_cubic
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_cubic (ha : a ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) = a := by
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, ← add_assoc (C b * X ^ 2), add_comm,
leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt <| degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb ha,
leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_cubic Polynomial.leadingCoeff_cubic
end Semiring
section NontrivialSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]} (n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_pow : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial _ (one_ne_zero' R)]
#align polynomial.degree_X_pow Polynomial.degree_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X_pow : natDegree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_X_pow n)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_pow Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow
@[simp] lemma natDegree_mul_X (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (p * X) = natDegree p + 1 := by
rw [natDegree_mul' (by simpa), natDegree_X]
@[simp] lemma natDegree_X_mul (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (X * p) = natDegree p + 1 := by
rw [commute_X p, natDegree_mul_X hp]
@[simp] lemma natDegree_mul_X_pow (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (p * X ^ n) = natDegree p + n := by
rw [natDegree_mul' (by simpa), natDegree_X_pow]
@[simp] lemma natDegree_X_pow_mul (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (X ^ n * p) = natDegree p + n := by
rw [commute_X_pow, natDegree_mul_X_pow n hp]
-- This lemma explicitly does not require the `Nontrivial R` assumption.
theorem natDegree_X_pow_le {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).natDegree ≤ n := by
nontriviality R
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_pow_le Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow_le
theorem not_isUnit_X : ¬IsUnit (X : R[X]) := fun ⟨⟨_, g, _hfg, hgf⟩, rfl⟩ =>
zero_ne_one' R <| by
rw [← coeff_one_zero, ← hgf]
simp
#align polynomial.not_is_unit_X Polynomial.not_isUnit_X
@[simp]
theorem degree_mul_X : degree (p * X) = degree p + 1 := by simp [monic_X.degree_mul]
#align polynomial.degree_mul_X Polynomial.degree_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem degree_mul_X_pow : degree (p * X ^ n) = degree p + n := by simp [(monic_X_pow n).degree_mul]
#align polynomial.degree_mul_X_pow Polynomial.degree_mul_X_pow
end NontrivialSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_sub_C (hp : 0 < degree p) : degree (p - C a) = degree p := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg, degree_add_C hp]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_sub_C {a : R} : natDegree (p - C a) = natDegree p := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg, natDegree_add_C]
theorem degree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p - q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree_neg q] using degree_add_le p (-q)
#align polynomial.degree_sub_le Polynomial.degree_sub_le
theorem degree_sub_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p - q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem leadingCoeff_sub_of_degree_lt (h : Polynomial.degree q < Polynomial.degree p) :
(p - q).leadingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [← q.degree_neg] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt' h]
theorem leadingCoeff_sub_of_degree_lt' (h : Polynomial.degree p < Polynomial.degree q) :
(p - q).leadingCoeff = -q.leadingCoeff := by
rw [← q.degree_neg] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt h, leadingCoeff_neg]
theorem leadingCoeff_sub_of_degree_eq (h : degree p = degree q)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p ≠ leadingCoeff q) :
leadingCoeff (p - q) = leadingCoeff p - leadingCoeff q := by
replace h : degree p = degree (-q) := by rwa [q.degree_neg]
replace hlc : leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff (-q) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← sub_ne_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, ← q.leadingCoeff_neg] at hlc
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq h hlc, leadingCoeff_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem natDegree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p - q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
simpa only [← natDegree_neg q] using natDegree_add_le p (-q)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub_le Polynomial.natDegree_sub_le
theorem natDegree_sub_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p - q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_sub_lt (hd : degree p = degree q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p = leadingCoeff q) : degree (p - q) < degree p :=
have hp : monomial (natDegree p) (leadingCoeff p) + p.erase (natDegree p) = p :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hq : monomial (natDegree q) (leadingCoeff q) + q.erase (natDegree q) = q :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hd' : natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [hd]
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := mt degree_eq_bot.2 (hd ▸ mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp0)
calc
degree (p - q) = degree (erase (natDegree q) p + -erase (natDegree q) q) := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← hp, ← hq, hlc, hd', add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (degree (erase (natDegree q) p)) (degree (erase (natDegree q) q)) :=
(degree_neg (erase (natDegree q) q) ▸ degree_add_le _ _)
_ < degree p := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨hd' ▸ degree_erase_lt hp0, hd.symm ▸ degree_erase_lt hq0⟩
#align polynomial.degree_sub_lt Polynomial.degree_sub_lt
theorem degree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).degree ≤ 1 :=
(degree_sub_le _ _).trans (max_le degree_X_le (degree_C_le.trans zero_le_one))
#align polynomial.degree_X_sub_C_le Polynomial.degree_X_sub_C_le
theorem natDegree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_X_sub_C_le r
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_sub_C_le Polynomial.natDegree_X_sub_C_le
theorem degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt (h : degree q < degree p) : degree (p - q) = degree p := by
rw [← degree_neg q] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt h]
#align polynomial.degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt
theorem degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) : degree (p - q) = degree q := by
rw [← degree_neg q] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt h, degree_neg]
#align polynomial.degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt
theorem natDegree_sub_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
natDegree (p - q) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub_eq_left_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_sub_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt
theorem natDegree_sub_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree p < natDegree q) :
natDegree (p - q) = natDegree q :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub_eq_right_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_sub_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt
end Ring
section NonzeroRing
variable [Nontrivial R]
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 1,493 | 1,499 | theorem degree_X_add_C (a : R) : degree (X + C a) = 1 := by |
have : degree (C a) < degree (X : R[X]) :=
calc
degree (C a) ≤ 0 := degree_C_le
_ < 1 := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
_ = degree X := degree_X.symm
rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt this, degree_X]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Scott Carnahan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
/-!
# Typeclasses for power-associative structures
In this file we define power-associativity for algebraic structures with a multiplication operation.
The class is a Prop-valued mixin named `NatPowAssoc`.
## Results
- `npow_add` a defining property: `x ^ (k + n) = x ^ k * x ^ n`
- `npow_one` a defining property: `x ^ 1 = x`
- `npow_assoc` strictly positive powers of an element have associative multiplication.
- `npow_comm` `x ^ m * x ^ n = x ^ n * x ^ m` for strictly positive `m` and `n`.
- `npow_mul` `x ^ (m * n) = (x ^ m) ^ n` for strictly positive `m` and `n`.
- `npow_eq_pow` monoid exponentiation coincides with semigroup exponentiation.
## Instances
We also produce the following instances:
- `NatPowAssoc` for Monoids, Pi types and products.
## Todo
* to_additive?
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {M : Type*}
/-- A mixin for power-associative multiplication. -/
class NatPowAssoc (M : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [Pow M ℕ] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is power-associative. -/
protected npow_add : ∀ (k n: ℕ) (x : M), x ^ (k + n) = x ^ k * x ^ n
/-- Exponent zero is one. -/
protected npow_zero : ∀ (x : M), x ^ 0 = 1
/-- Exponent one is identity. -/
protected npow_one : ∀ (x : M), x ^ 1 = x
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M] [Pow M ℕ] [NatPowAssoc M]
theorem npow_add (k n : ℕ) (x : M) : x ^ (k + n) = x ^ k * x ^ n :=
NatPowAssoc.npow_add k n x
@[simp]
theorem npow_zero (x : M) : x ^ 0 = 1 :=
NatPowAssoc.npow_zero x
@[simp]
theorem npow_one (x : M) : x ^ 1 = x :=
NatPowAssoc.npow_one x
theorem npow_mul_assoc (k m n : ℕ) (x : M) :
(x ^ k * x ^ m) * x ^ n = x ^ k * (x ^ m * x ^ n) := by
simp only [← npow_add, add_assoc]
theorem npow_mul_comm (m n : ℕ) (x : M) :
x ^ m * x ^ n = x ^ n * x ^ m := by simp only [← npow_add, add_comm]
theorem npow_mul (x : M) (m n : ℕ) : x ^ (m * n) = (x ^ m) ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [npow_zero, Nat.mul_zero, npow_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [mul_add, npow_add, ih, mul_one, npow_add, npow_one]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/NatPowAssoc.lean | 77 | 79 | theorem npow_mul' (x : M) (m n : ℕ) : x ^ (m * n) = (x ^ n) ^ m := by |
rw [mul_comm]
exact npow_mul x n m
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
#align_import group_theory.specific_groups.cyclic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0f6670b8af2dff699de1c0b4b49039b31bc13c46"
/-!
# Cyclic groups
A group `G` is called cyclic if there exists an element `g : G` such that every element of `G` is of
the form `g ^ n` for some `n : ℕ`. This file only deals with the predicate on a group to be cyclic.
For the concrete cyclic group of order `n`, see `Data.ZMod.Basic`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclic` is a predicate on a group stating that the group is cyclic.
## Main statements
* `isCyclic_of_prime_card` proves that a finite group of prime order is cyclic.
* `isSimpleGroup_of_prime_card`, `IsSimpleGroup.isCyclic`,
and `IsSimpleGroup.prime_card` classify finite simple abelian groups.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_card`: For a finite cyclic group `G`, the exponent is equal to
the group's cardinality.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_zero_of_infinite`: Infinite cyclic groups have exponent zero.
* `IsCyclic.iff_exponent_eq_card`: A finite commutative group is cyclic iff its exponent
is equal to its cardinality.
## Tags
cyclic group
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {a : α}
section Cyclic
attribute [local instance] setFintype
open Subgroup
/-- A group is called *cyclic* if it is generated by a single element. -/
class IsAddCyclic (α : Type u) [AddGroup α] : Prop where
exists_generator : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples g
#align is_add_cyclic IsAddCyclic
/-- A group is called *cyclic* if it is generated by a single element. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsCyclic (α : Type u) [Group α] : Prop where
exists_generator : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g
#align is_cyclic IsCyclic
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) isCyclic_of_subsingleton [Group α] [Subsingleton α] : IsCyclic α :=
⟨⟨1, fun x => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
exact mem_zpowers 1⟩⟩
#align is_cyclic_of_subsingleton isCyclic_of_subsingleton
#align is_add_cyclic_of_subsingleton isAddCyclic_of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem isCyclic_multiplicative_iff [AddGroup α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) ↔ IsAddCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isCyclic_multiplicative [AddGroup α] [IsAddCyclic α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) :=
isCyclic_multiplicative_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem isAddCyclic_additive_iff [Group α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) ↔ IsCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isAddCyclic_additive [Group α] [IsCyclic α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) :=
isAddCyclic_additive_iff.mpr inferInstance
/-- A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have a better
proof of `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have
a better proof of `AddCommGroup`."]
def IsCyclic.commGroup [hg : Group α] [IsCyclic α] : CommGroup α :=
{ hg with
mul_comm := fun x y =>
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := hg x
let ⟨_, hm⟩ := hg y
hm ▸ hn ▸ zpow_mul_comm _ _ _ }
#align is_cyclic.comm_group IsCyclic.commGroup
#align is_add_cyclic.add_comm_group IsAddCyclic.addCommGroup
variable [Group α]
/-- A non-cyclic multiplicative group is non-trivial. -/
@[to_additive "A non-cyclic additive group is non-trivial."]
theorem Nontrivial.of_not_isCyclic (nc : ¬IsCyclic α) : Nontrivial α := by
contrapose! nc
exact @isCyclic_of_subsingleton _ _ (not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp nc)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_cyclic {G : Type*} [Group G] [h : IsCyclic G] (σ : G →* G) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ g : G, σ g = g ^ m := by
obtain ⟨h, hG⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hG (σ h)
refine ⟨m, fun g => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hG g
rw [MonoidHom.map_zpow, ← hm, ← zpow_mul, ← zpow_mul']
#align monoid_hom.map_cyclic MonoidHom.map_cyclic
#align monoid_add_hom.map_add_cyclic AddMonoidHom.map_addCyclic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias
MonoidAddHom.map_add_cyclic := AddMonoidHom.map_addCyclic
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card [Fintype α] (x : α) (hx : orderOf x = Fintype.card α) :
IsCyclic α := by
classical
use x
simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
rw [← Fintype.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α), ← Fintype.card_zpowers] at hx
exact Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_univ _) (ge_of_eq hx)
#align is_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card
#align is_add_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card isAddCyclic_of_addOrderOf_eq_card
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias isAddCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card := isAddCyclic_of_addOrderOf_eq_card
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G}
(H : Subgroup G) [hp : Fact (Fintype.card G).Prime] : H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤ := by
classical
have := card_subgroup_dvd_card H
rwa [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card (α := G), Nat.dvd_prime hp.1, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
← eq_bot_iff_card, card_eq_iff_eq_top] at this
/-- Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group. -/
@[to_additive "Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group."]
theorem zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Fintype.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : zpowers g = ⊤ := by
subst h
have := (zpowers g).eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card
rwa [zpowers_eq_bot, or_iff_right hg] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_zpowers_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ zpowers g := by
simp_rw [zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card h hg, Subgroup.mem_top]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ Submonoid.powers g := by
rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SpecificGroups/Cyclic.lean | 163 | 166 | theorem powers_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Fintype.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : Submonoid.powers g = ⊤ := by |
ext x
simp [mem_powers_of_prime_card h hg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
#align_import linear_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
/-!
# Range of linear maps
The range `LinearMap.range` of a (semi)linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
More specifically, `LinearMap.range` applies to any `SemilinearMapClass` over a `RingHomSurjective`
ring homomorphism.
Note that this also means that dot notation (i.e. `f.range` for a linear map `f`) does not work.
## Notations
* We continue to use the notations `M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` and `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of semilinear
(resp. linear) maps from `M` to `M₂` over the ring homomorphism `σ` (resp. over the ring `R`).
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module, range
-/
open Function
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*} {K₂ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The range of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
(map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align linear_map.range LinearMap.range
theorem range_coe [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : (range f : Set M₂) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.range_coe LinearMap.range_coe
theorem range_toAddSubmonoid [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
f.range.toAddSubmonoid = AddMonoidHom.mrange f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.range_to_add_submonoid LinearMap.range_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem mem_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {x} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.mem_range LinearMap.mem_range
theorem range_eq_map [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : range f = map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
#align linear_map.range_eq_map LinearMap.range_eq_map
theorem mem_range_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (x : M) : f x ∈ range f :=
⟨x, rfl⟩
#align linear_map.mem_range_self LinearMap.mem_range_self
@[simp]
theorem range_id : range (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Set.range_id
#align linear_map.range_id LinearMap.range_id
theorem range_comp [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃]
(f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = map g (range f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
#align linear_map.range_comp LinearMap.range_comp
theorem range_comp_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) ≤ range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
#align linear_map.range_comp_le_range LinearMap.range_comp_le_range
theorem range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} : range f = ⊤ ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, Set.range_iff_surjective]
#align linear_map.range_eq_top LinearMap.range_eq_top
theorem range_le_iff_comap [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
#align linear_map.range_le_iff_comap LinearMap.range_le_iff_comap
theorem map_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset_range f p)
#align linear_map.map_le_range LinearMap.map_le_range
@[simp]
theorem range_neg {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [Semiring R] [Ring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : LinearMap.range (-f) = LinearMap.range f := by
change range ((-LinearMap.id : M₂ →ₗ[R₂] M₂).comp f) = _
rw [range_comp, Submodule.map_neg, Submodule.map_id]
#align linear_map.range_neg LinearMap.range_neg
lemma range_domRestrict_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (S : Submodule R M) :
LinearMap.range (f.domRestrict S) ≤ LinearMap.range f := by
rintro x ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, rfl⟩
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self f y
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_range {M M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M]
[AddCommGroup M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
LinearMap.range f.toIntLinearMap = AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule f.range := rfl
lemma _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_le [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : p ≤ LinearMap.range f) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset h
end
/-- The decreasing sequence of submodules consisting of the ranges of the iterates of a linear map.
-/
@[simps]
def iterateRange (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : ℕ →o (Submodule R M)ᵒᵈ where
toFun n := LinearMap.range (f ^ n)
monotone' n m w x h := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp w
rw [LinearMap.mem_range] at h
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := h
rw [LinearMap.mem_range]
use (f ^ c) m
rw [pow_add, LinearMap.mul_apply]
#align linear_map.iterate_range LinearMap.iterateRange
/-- Restrict the codomain of a linear map `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] LinearMap.range f :=
f.codRestrict (LinearMap.range f) (LinearMap.mem_range_self f)
#align linear_map.range_restrict LinearMap.rangeRestrict
/-- The range of a linear map is finite if the domain is finite.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `Fintype M₂`. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype M] [DecidableEq M₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
Fintype (range f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
#align linear_map.fintype_range LinearMap.fintypeRange
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
theorem range_codRestrict {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomSurjective τ₂₁] (p : Submodule R M)
(f : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) (hf) :
range (codRestrict p f hf) = comap p.subtype (LinearMap.range f) := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using map_codRestrict _ _ _ _
#align linear_map.range_cod_restrict LinearMap.range_codRestrict
theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) = range f ⊓ q :=
le_antisymm (le_inf map_le_range (map_comap_le _ _)) <| by
rintro _ ⟨⟨x, _, rfl⟩, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
#align submodule.map_comap_eq Submodule.map_comap_eq
theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : q ≤ range f) : map f (comap f q) = q := by rwa [Submodule.map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
#align submodule.map_comap_eq_self Submodule.map_comap_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem range_zero [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] : range (0 : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) = ⊥ := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_zero _
#align linear_map.range_zero LinearMap.range_zero
section
variable [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂]
theorem range_le_bot_iff (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : range f ≤ ⊥ ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [range_le_iff_comap]; exact ker_eq_top
#align linear_map.range_le_bot_iff LinearMap.range_le_bot_iff
theorem range_eq_bot {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} : range f = ⊥ ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [← range_le_bot_iff, le_bot_iff]
#align linear_map.range_eq_bot LinearMap.range_eq_bot
theorem range_le_ker_iff {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} {g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃} :
range f ≤ ker g ↔ (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ker_eq_top.1 <| eq_top_iff'.2 fun x => h <| ⟨_, rfl⟩, fun h x hx =>
mem_ker.2 <| Exists.elim hx fun y hy => by rw [← hy, ← comp_apply, h, zero_apply]⟩
#align linear_map.range_le_ker_iff LinearMap.range_le_ker_iff
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f : F} (hf : range f = ⊤) {p p'} : comap f p ≤ comap f p' ↔ p ≤ p' :=
⟨fun H x hx => by rcases range_eq_top.1 hf x with ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩; exact H hx, comap_mono⟩
#align linear_map.comap_le_comap_iff LinearMap.comap_le_comap_iff
theorem comap_injective {f : F} (hf : range f = ⊤) : Injective (comap f) := fun _ _ h =>
le_antisymm ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (le_of_eq h)) ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (ge_of_eq h))
#align linear_map.comap_injective LinearMap.comap_injective
end
end AddCommMonoid
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Ring R₂] [Ring R₃]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
variable {f : F}
open Submodule
theorem range_toAddSubgroup [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
(range f).toAddSubgroup = f.toAddMonoidHom.range :=
rfl
#align linear_map.range_to_add_subgroup LinearMap.range_toAddSubgroup
theorem ker_le_iff [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {p : Submodule R M} :
ker f ≤ p ↔ ∃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y} ⊆ p := by
constructor
· intro h
use 0
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, range_coe]
exact ⟨⟨0, map_zero f⟩, h⟩
· rintro ⟨y, h₁, h₂⟩
rw [SetLike.le_def]
intro z hz
simp only [mem_ker, SetLike.mem_coe] at hz
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, range_coe, Set.mem_range] at h₁
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h₁
have hx' : x ∈ p := h₂ hx
have hxz : z + x ∈ p := by
apply h₂
simp [hx, hz]
suffices z + x - x ∈ p by simpa only [this, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact p.sub_mem hxz hx'
#align linear_map.ker_le_iff LinearMap.ker_le_iff
end Ring
section Semifield
variable [Semifield K] [Semifield K₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
variable [AddCommMonoid V₂] [Module K V₂]
theorem range_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : range (a • f) = range f := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_smul f _ a h
#align linear_map.range_smul LinearMap.range_smul
theorem range_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) :
range (a • f) = ⨆ _ : a ≠ 0, range f := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_smul' f _ a
#align linear_map.range_smul' LinearMap.range_smul'
end Semifield
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable (p p' : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂)
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
open LinearMap
@[simp]
theorem map_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : map f ⊤ = range f :=
(range_eq_map f).symm
#align submodule.map_top Submodule.map_top
@[simp]
theorem range_subtype : range p.subtype = p := by simpa using map_comap_subtype p ⊤
#align submodule.range_subtype Submodule.range_subtype
theorem map_subtype_le (p' : Submodule R p) : map p.subtype p' ≤ p := by
simpa using (map_le_range : map p.subtype p' ≤ range p.subtype)
#align submodule.map_subtype_le Submodule.map_subtype_le
/-- Under the canonical linear map from a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`, the image of the
maximal submodule of `p` is just `p`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem map_subtype_top : map p.subtype (⊤ : Submodule R p) = p := by simp
#align submodule.map_subtype_top Submodule.map_subtype_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_subtype_eq_top {p p' : Submodule R M} : comap p.subtype p' = ⊤ ↔ p ≤ p' :=
eq_top_iff.trans <| map_le_iff_le_comap.symm.trans <| by rw [map_subtype_top]
#align submodule.comap_subtype_eq_top Submodule.comap_subtype_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_subtype_self : comap p.subtype p = ⊤ :=
comap_subtype_eq_top.2 le_rfl
#align submodule.comap_subtype_self Submodule.comap_subtype_self
theorem range_inclusion (p q : Submodule R M) (h : p ≤ q) :
range (inclusion h) = comap q.subtype p := by
rw [← map_top, inclusion, LinearMap.map_codRestrict, map_top, range_subtype]
#align submodule.range_of_le Submodule.range_inclusion
@[simp]
theorem map_subtype_range_inclusion {p p' : Submodule R M} (h : p ≤ p') :
map p'.subtype (range <| inclusion h) = p := by simp [range_inclusion, map_comap_eq, h]
#align submodule.map_subtype_range_of_le Submodule.map_subtype_range_inclusion
/-- If `N ⊆ M` then submodules of `N` are the same as submodules of `M` contained in `N`.
See also `Submodule.mapIic`. -/
def MapSubtype.relIso : Submodule R p ≃o { p' : Submodule R M // p' ≤ p } where
toFun p' := ⟨map p.subtype p', map_subtype_le p _⟩
invFun q := comap p.subtype q
left_inv p' := comap_map_eq_of_injective (by exact Subtype.val_injective) p'
right_inv := fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => Subtype.ext_val <| by simp [map_comap_subtype p, inf_of_le_right hq]
map_rel_iff' {p₁ p₂} := Subtype.coe_le_coe.symm.trans <| by
dsimp
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap,
comap_map_eq_of_injective (show Injective p.subtype from Subtype.coe_injective) p₂]
#align submodule.map_subtype.rel_iso Submodule.MapSubtype.relIso
/-- If `p ⊆ M` is a submodule, the ordering of submodules of `p` is embedded in the ordering of
submodules of `M`. -/
def MapSubtype.orderEmbedding : Submodule R p ↪o Submodule R M :=
(RelIso.toRelEmbedding <| MapSubtype.relIso p).trans <|
Subtype.relEmbedding (X := Submodule R M) (fun p p' ↦ p ≤ p') _
#align submodule.map_subtype.order_embedding Submodule.MapSubtype.orderEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem map_subtype_embedding_eq (p' : Submodule R p) :
MapSubtype.orderEmbedding p p' = map p.subtype p' :=
rfl
#align submodule.map_subtype_embedding_eq Submodule.map_subtype_embedding_eq
/-- If `N ⊆ M` then submodules of `N` are the same as submodules of `M` contained in `N`. -/
def mapIic [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (p : Submodule R M) :
Submodule R p ≃o Set.Iic p :=
Submodule.MapSubtype.relIso p
@[simp] lemma coe_mapIic_apply [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
(p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R p) :
(p.mapIic q : Submodule R M) = q.map p.subtype :=
rfl
end AddCommMonoid
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
/-- A monomorphism is injective. -/
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_cancel {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂}
(h : ∀ u v : ker f →ₗ[R] M, f.comp u = f.comp v → u = v) : ker f = ⊥ := by
have h₁ : f.comp (0 : ker f →ₗ[R] M) = 0 := comp_zero _
rw [← Submodule.range_subtype (ker f),
← h 0 f.ker.subtype (Eq.trans h₁ (comp_ker_subtype f).symm)]
exact range_zero
#align linear_map.ker_eq_bot_of_cancel LinearMap.ker_eq_bot_of_cancel
theorem range_comp_of_range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃]
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) (hf : range f = ⊤) :
range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = range g := by rw [range_comp, hf, Submodule.map_top]
#align linear_map.range_comp_of_range_eq_top LinearMap.range_comp_of_range_eq_top
section Image
/-- If `O` is a submodule of `M`, and `Φ : O →ₗ M'` is a linear map,
then `(ϕ : O →ₗ M').submoduleImage N` is `ϕ(N)` as a submodule of `M'` -/
def submoduleImage {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] {O : Submodule R M}
(ϕ : O →ₗ[R] M') (N : Submodule R M) : Submodule R M' :=
(N.comap O.subtype).map ϕ
#align linear_map.submodule_image LinearMap.submoduleImage
@[simp]
theorem mem_submoduleImage {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] {O : Submodule R M}
{ϕ : O →ₗ[R] M'} {N : Submodule R M} {x : M'} :
x ∈ ϕ.submoduleImage N ↔ ∃ (y : _) (yO : y ∈ O), y ∈ N ∧ ϕ ⟨y, yO⟩ = x := by
refine Submodule.mem_map.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp_rw [Submodule.mem_comap]
· rintro ⟨⟨y, yO⟩, yN : y ∈ N, h⟩
exact ⟨y, yO, yN, h⟩
· rintro ⟨y, yO, yN, h⟩
exact ⟨⟨y, yO⟩, yN, h⟩
#align linear_map.mem_submodule_image LinearMap.mem_submoduleImage
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Range.lean | 412 | 419 | theorem mem_submoduleImage_of_le {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] {O : Submodule R M}
{ϕ : O →ₗ[R] M'} {N : Submodule R M} (hNO : N ≤ O) {x : M'} :
x ∈ ϕ.submoduleImage N ↔ ∃ (y : _) (yN : y ∈ N), ϕ ⟨y, hNO yN⟩ = x := by |
refine mem_submoduleImage.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨y, yO, yN, h⟩
exact ⟨y, yN, h⟩
· rintro ⟨y, yN, h⟩
exact ⟨y, hNO yN, yN, h⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
#align_import category_theory.limits.fubini from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59382264386afdbaf1727e617f5fdda511992eb9"
/-!
# A Fubini theorem for categorical (co)limits
We prove that $lim_{J × K} G = lim_J (lim_K G(j, -))$ for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
when all the appropriate limits exist.
We begin working with a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`. We'll write `G : J × K ⥤ C` for the associated
"uncurried" functor.
In the first part, given a coherent family `D` of limit cones over the functors `F.obj j`,
and a cone `c` over `G`, we construct a cone over the cone points of `D`.
We then show that if `c` is a limit cone, the constructed cone is also a limit cone.
In the second part, we state the Fubini theorem in the setting where limits are
provided by suitable `HasLimit` classes.
We construct
`limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim)`
and give simp lemmas characterising it.
For convenience, we also provide
`limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G : limit G ≅ limit ((curry.obj G) ⋙ lim)`
in terms of the uncurried functor.
All statements have their counterpart for colimits.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J K : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [SmallCategory K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C)
-- We could try introducing a "dependent functor type" to handle this?
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCones where
/-- For each object, a cone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (Cones.postcompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j) ⟶ obj j'
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cocones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCocones where
/-- For each object, a cocone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cocone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cocones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (obj j) ⟶ (Cocones.precompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j')
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
variable {F}
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCones.conePoints (D : DiagramOfCones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.conePoints
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cocone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCocones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints (D : DiagramOfCocones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `F.obj j`, and a cone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun k => c.π.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j, k') (𝟙 j, f)
dsimp at this
simp? at this says
simp only [Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j').hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.ConeMorphism.w, Limits.Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Limits.IsLimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurry
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones over the `F.obj j`, and a cocone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cocone over the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun k => c.ι.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1; equals (F.map (𝟙 _)).app _ ≫ (F.obj j).map f =>
simp;
conv_lhs => arg 1; rw [← uncurry_obj_map F ((𝟙 j,f) : (j,k) ⟶ (j,k'))]
rw [c.w] } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j).hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.CoconeMorphism.w_assoc, Limits.Cocones.precompose_obj_ι,
Limits.IsColimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsColimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.comp_id,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.ι (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone when `c` is a limit cone.
-/
def coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c) where
lift s :=
P.lift
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun p => s.π.app p.1 ≫ (D.obj p.1).π.app p.2
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← (D.obj j).π.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k'
dsimp at w
rw [← w]
have n := s.π.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.id_comp] at n
rw [n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
π := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit
/-- `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone when `c` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c) where
desc s :=
P.desc
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun p => (D.obj p.1).ι.app p.2 ≫ s.ι.app p.1
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [(D.obj j').ι.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k
dsimp at w
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← w]
have n := s.ι.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.comp_id] at n
rw [← n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
ι := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
section
variable (F)
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed limits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the limit cone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits : DiagramOfCones F where
obj j := limit.cone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := lim.map (F.map f) }
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfConesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F⟩
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones_inhabited CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramOfConesInhabited
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints :
(DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F).conePoints = F ⋙ lim :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits_cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints
variable [HasLimit (uncurry.obj F)]
variable [HasLimit (F ⋙ lim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the limit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the limit of the limits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) := by
let c := limit.cone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsLimit c := limit.isLimit _
let G := DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (G.obj j) := fun j => limit.isLimit _
have Q' := coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit Q P
have Q'' := limit.isLimit (F ⋙ lim)
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k = limit.π _ (j, k) := by
dsimp [limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso, IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ (j, k) =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π
end
section
variable (F)
variable [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed colimits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the colimit cocone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cocone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits : DiagramOfCocones F where
obj j := colimit.cocone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := colim.map (F.map f) }
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfCoconesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCocones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F⟩
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits_coconePoints :
(DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F).coconePoints = F ⋙ colim :=
rfl
variable [HasColimit (uncurry.obj F)]
variable [HasColimit (F ⋙ colim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the colimit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the colimit of the colimits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim :
colimit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ colimit (F ⋙ colim) := by
let c := colimit.cocone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsColimit c := colimit.isColimit _
let G := DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (G.obj j) := fun j => colimit.isColimit _
have Q' := coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit Q P
have Q'' := colimit.isColimit (F ⋙ colim)
exact IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_inv {j} {k} :
colimit.ι (F.obj j) k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j ≫ (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).inv =
colimit.ι (uncurry.obj F) (j, k) := by
dsimp [colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso,
IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim_ι_hom {j} {k} :
colimit.ι _ (j, k) ≫ (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).hom =
(colimit.ι _ k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ (colimit (F ⋙ colim))) := by
rw [← cancel_mono (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).inv]
simp
end
section
variable (F) [HasLimitsOfShape J C] [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
-- With only moderate effort these could be derived if needed:
variable [HasLimitsOfShape (J × K) C] [HasLimitsOfShape (K × J) C]
/-- The limit of `F.flip ⋙ lim` is isomorphic to the limit of `F ⋙ lim`. -/
noncomputable def limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim : limit (F.flip ⋙ lim) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) :=
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim _).symm ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (uncurryObjFlip _) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => by rfl) ≪≫
limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim _
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π (j) (k) :
(limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k =
(limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
-- See note [dsimp, simp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π_π (k) (j) :
(limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim_inv_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π_π
end
section
variable (F) [HasColimitsOfShape J C] [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
variable [HasColimitsOfShape (J × K) C] [HasColimitsOfShape (K × J) C]
/-- The colimit of `F.flip ⋙ colim` is isomorphic to the colimit of `F ⋙ colim`. -/
noncomputable def colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim :
colimit (F.flip ⋙ colim) ≅ colimit (F ⋙ colim) :=
(colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim _).symm ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso (uncurryObjFlip _) ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => by rfl) ≪≫
colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim _
@[simp, reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Fubini.lean | 414 | 420 | theorem colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_hom (j) (k) :
colimit.ι (F.flip.obj k) j ≫ colimit.ι (F.flip ⋙ colim) k ≫
(colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim F).hom =
(colimit.ι _ k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ colimit (F⋙ colim)) := by |
dsimp [colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim]
slice_lhs 1 3 => simp only []
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.comap from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"aba31c938d3243cc671be7091b28a1e0814647ee"
/-!
# `comap` operation on `MvPolynomial`
This file defines the `comap` function on `MvPolynomial`.
`MvPolynomial.comap` is a low-tech example of a map of "algebraic varieties," modulo the fact that
`mathlib` does not yet define varieties.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
-/
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*} {υ : Type*} {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/-- Given an algebra hom `f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R`
and a variable evaluation `v : τ → R`,
`comap f v` produces a variable evaluation `σ → R`.
-/
noncomputable def comap (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R) : (τ → R) → σ → R :=
fun x i => aeval x (f (X i))
#align mv_polynomial.comap MvPolynomial.comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_apply (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R) (x : τ → R) (i : σ) :
comap f x i = aeval x (f (X i)) :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.comap_apply MvPolynomial.comap_apply
@[simp]
theorem comap_id_apply (x : σ → R) : comap (AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R)) x = x := by
funext i
simp only [comap, AlgHom.id_apply, id, aeval_X]
#align mv_polynomial.comap_id_apply MvPolynomial.comap_id_apply
variable (σ R)
theorem comap_id : comap (AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = id := by
funext x
exact comap_id_apply x
#align mv_polynomial.comap_id MvPolynomial.comap_id
variable {σ R}
theorem comap_comp_apply (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R)
(g : MvPolynomial τ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial υ R) (x : υ → R) :
comap (g.comp f) x = comap f (comap g x) := by
funext i
trans aeval x (aeval (fun i => g (X i)) (f (X i)))
· apply eval₂Hom_congr rfl rfl
rw [AlgHom.comp_apply]
suffices g = aeval fun i => g (X i) by rw [← this]
exact aeval_unique g
· simp only [comap, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom, map_eval₂Hom, AlgHom.comp_apply]
refine eval₂Hom_congr ?_ rfl rfl
ext r
apply aeval_C
#align mv_polynomial.comap_comp_apply MvPolynomial.comap_comp_apply
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Comap.lean | 77 | 80 | theorem comap_comp (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R)
(g : MvPolynomial τ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial υ R) : comap (g.comp f) = comap f ∘ comap g := by |
funext x
exact comap_comp_apply _ _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 709 | 709 | theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by | simp [tail]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.integral.interval_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Integral over an interval
In this file we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ` if `a ≤ b` and
`-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ` if `b ≤ a`.
## Implementation notes
### Avoiding `if`, `min`, and `max`
In order to avoid `if`s in the definition, we define `IntervalIntegrable f μ a b` as
`integrable_on f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ integrable_on f (Ioc b a) μ`. For any `a`, `b` one of these
intervals is empty and the other coincides with `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)`.
Similarly, we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`.
Again, for any `a`, `b` one of these integrals is zero, and the other gives the expected result.
This way some properties can be translated from integrals over sets without dealing with
the cases `a ≤ b` and `b ≤ a` separately.
### Choice of the interval
We use integral over `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)` instead of one of the other
three possible intervals with the same endpoints for two reasons:
* this way `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ` holds whenever
`f` is integrable on each interval; in particular, it works even if the measure `μ` has an atom
at `b`; this rules out `Set.Ioo` and `Set.Icc` intervals;
* with this definition for a probability measure `μ`, the integral `∫ x in a..b, 1 ∂μ` equals
the difference $F_μ(b)-F_μ(a)$, where $F_μ(a)=μ(-∞, a]$ is the
[cumulative distribution function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function)
of `μ`.
## Tags
integral
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory Set Filter Function
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal Interval NNReal
variable {ι 𝕜 E F A : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-!
### Integrability on an interval
-/
/-- A function `f` is called *interval integrable* with respect to a measure `μ` on an unordered
interval `a..b` if it is integrable on both intervals `(a, b]` and `(b, a]`. One of these
intervals is always empty, so this property is equivalent to `f` being integrable on
`(min a b, max a b]`. -/
def IntervalIntegrable (f : ℝ → E) (μ : Measure ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : Prop :=
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ IntegrableOn f (Ioc b a) μ
#align interval_integrable IntervalIntegrable
/-!
## Basic iff's for `IntervalIntegrable`
-/
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
/-- A function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` if and
only if it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. This is an equivalent
definition of `IntervalIntegrable`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ := by
rw [uIoc_eq_union, integrableOn_union, IntervalIntegrable]
#align interval_integrable_iff intervalIntegrable_iff
/-- If a function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` then
it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. -/
theorem IntervalIntegrable.def' (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mp h
#align interval_integrable.def IntervalIntegrable.def'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le hab]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Ioc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff' [NoAtoms μ] :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (uIcc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, ← Icc_min_max, uIoc, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff' intervalIntegrable_iff'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b)
{μ : Measure ℝ} [NoAtoms μ] : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Icc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ico_of_le [NoAtoms μ] (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico]
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le [NoAtoms μ] (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo]
/-- If a function is integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` then it is interval integrable
with respect to `μ` on `uIcc a b`. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.Integrable.intervalIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
⟨hf.integrableOn, hf.integrableOn⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.interval_integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable.intervalIntegrable
theorem MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.intervalIntegrable (hf : IntegrableOn f [[a, b]] μ) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b :=
⟨MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.mono_set hf (Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_uIcc),
MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.mono_set hf (Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_uIcc')⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_on.interval_integrable MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.intervalIntegrable
theorem intervalIntegrable_const_iff {c : E} :
IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ (Ι a b) < ∞ := by
simp only [intervalIntegrable_iff, integrableOn_const]
#align interval_integrable_const_iff intervalIntegrable_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {c : E} :
IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b :=
intervalIntegrable_const_iff.2 <| Or.inr measure_Ioc_lt_top
#align interval_integrable_const intervalIntegrable_const
end
/-!
## Basic properties of interval integrability
- interval integrability is symmetric, reflexive, transitive
- monotonicity and strong measurability of the interval integral
- if `f` is interval integrable, so are its absolute value and norm
- arithmetic properties
-/
namespace IntervalIntegrable
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b c d : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure ℝ}
@[symm]
nonrec theorem symm (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable f μ b a :=
h.symm
#align interval_integrable.symm IntervalIntegrable.symm
@[refl, simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem refl : IntervalIntegrable f μ a a := by constructor <;> simp
#align interval_integrable.refl IntervalIntegrable.refl
@[trans]
theorem trans {a b c : ℝ} (hab : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) (hbc : IntervalIntegrable f μ b c) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a c :=
⟨(hab.1.union hbc.1).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc,
(hbc.2.union hab.2).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc⟩
#align interval_integrable.trans IntervalIntegrable.trans
theorem trans_iterate_Ico {a : ℕ → ℝ} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(hint : ∀ k ∈ Ico m n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ (a m) (a n) := by
revert hint
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n hmn
· simp
· intro p hp IH h
exact (IH fun k hk => h k (Ico_subset_Ico_right p.le_succ hk)).trans (h p (by simp [hp]))
#align interval_integrable.trans_iterate_Ico IntervalIntegrable.trans_iterate_Ico
theorem trans_iterate {a : ℕ → ℝ} {n : ℕ}
(hint : ∀ k < n, IntervalIntegrable f μ (a k) (a <| k + 1)) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ (a 0) (a n) :=
trans_iterate_Ico bot_le fun k hk => hint k hk.2
#align interval_integrable.trans_iterate IntervalIntegrable.trans_iterate
theorem neg (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable (-f) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.neg, h.2.neg⟩
#align interval_integrable.neg IntervalIntegrable.neg
theorem norm (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.norm, h.2.norm⟩
#align interval_integrable.norm IntervalIntegrable.norm
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 195 | 198 | theorem intervalIntegrable_norm_iff {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (Ι a b))) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun t => ‖f t‖) μ a b ↔ IntervalIntegrable f μ a b := by |
simp_rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, IntegrableOn]; exact integrable_norm_iff hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Utensil Song
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.RingQuot
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Isometry
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d46774d43797f5d1f507a63a6e904f7a533ae74a"
/-!
# Clifford Algebras
We construct the Clifford algebra of a module `M` over a commutative ring `R`, equipped with
a quadratic form `Q`.
## Notation
The Clifford algebra of the `R`-module `M` equipped with a quadratic form `Q` is
an `R`-algebra denoted `CliffordAlgebra Q`.
Given a linear morphism `f : M → A` from a module `M` to another `R`-algebra `A`, such that
`cond : ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m)`, there is a (unique) lift of `f` to an `R`-algebra
morphism from `CliffordAlgebra Q` to `A`, which is denoted `CliffordAlgebra.lift Q f cond`.
The canonical linear map `M → CliffordAlgebra Q` is denoted `CliffordAlgebra.ι Q`.
## Theorems
The main theorems proved ensure that `CliffordAlgebra Q` satisfies the universal property
of the Clifford algebra.
1. `ι_comp_lift` is the fact that the composition of `ι Q` with `lift Q f cond` agrees with `f`.
2. `lift_unique` ensures the uniqueness of `lift Q f cond` with respect to 1.
## Implementation details
The Clifford algebra of `M` is constructed as a quotient of the tensor algebra, as follows.
1. We define a relation `CliffordAlgebra.Rel Q` on `TensorAlgebra R M`.
This is the smallest relation which identifies squares of elements of `M` with `Q m`.
2. The Clifford algebra is the quotient of the tensor algebra by this relation.
This file is almost identical to `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/ExteriorAlgebra/Basic.lean`.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
open TensorAlgebra
/-- `Rel` relates each `ι m * ι m`, for `m : M`, with `Q m`.
The Clifford algebra of `M` is defined as the quotient modulo this relation.
-/
inductive Rel : TensorAlgebra R M → TensorAlgebra R M → Prop
| of (m : M) : Rel (ι R m * ι R m) (algebraMap R _ (Q m))
#align clifford_algebra.rel CliffordAlgebra.Rel
end CliffordAlgebra
/-- The Clifford algebra of an `R`-module `M` equipped with a quadratic_form `Q`.
-/
def CliffordAlgebra :=
RingQuot (CliffordAlgebra.Rel Q)
#align clifford_algebra CliffordAlgebra
namespace CliffordAlgebra
-- Porting note: Expanded `deriving Inhabited, Semiring, Algebra`
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (CliffordAlgebra Q) := RingQuot.instInhabited _
#align clifford_algebra.inhabited CliffordAlgebra.instInhabited
instance instRing : Ring (CliffordAlgebra Q) := RingQuot.instRing _
#align clifford_algebra.ring CliffordAlgebra.instRing
instance (priority := 900) instAlgebra' {R A M} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] [Module R M] [Module A M] (Q : QuadraticForm A M)
[IsScalarTower R A M] :
Algebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instAlgebra _
-- verify there are no diamonds
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` #10906
example : (algebraNat : Algebra ℕ (CliffordAlgebra Q)) = instAlgebra' _ := rfl
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` #10906
example : (algebraInt _ : Algebra ℤ (CliffordAlgebra Q)) = instAlgebra' _ := rfl
-- shortcut instance, as the other instance is slow
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := instAlgebra' _
#align clifford_algebra.algebra CliffordAlgebra.instAlgebra
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M] (Q : QuadraticForm A M)
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] :
SMulCommClass R S (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instSMulCommClass _
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[SMul R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] [IsScalarTower R S A] (Q : QuadraticForm A M) :
IsScalarTower R S (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instIsScalarTower _
/-- The canonical linear map `M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q`.
-/
def ι : M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(RingQuot.mkAlgHom R _).toLinearMap.comp (TensorAlgebra.ι R)
#align clifford_algebra.ι CliffordAlgebra.ι
/-- As well as being linear, `ι Q` squares to the quadratic form -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Basic.lean | 117 | 119 | theorem ι_sq_scalar (m : M) : ι Q m * ι Q m = algebraMap R _ (Q m) := by |
erw [← AlgHom.map_mul, RingQuot.mkAlgHom_rel R (Rel.of m), AlgHom.commutes]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Set
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Set
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
#align_import order.complete_lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5709b0d8725255e76f47debca6400c07b5c2d8e6"
/-!
# Theory of complete lattices
## Main definitions
* `sSup` and `sInf` are the supremum and the infimum of a set;
* `iSup (f : ι → α)` and `iInf (f : ι → α)` are indexed supremum and infimum of a function,
defined as `sSup` and `sInf` of the range of this function;
* class `CompleteLattice`: a bounded lattice such that `sSup s` is always the least upper boundary
of `s` and `sInf s` is always the greatest lower boundary of `s`;
* class `CompleteLinearOrder`: a linear ordered complete lattice.
## Naming conventions
In lemma names,
* `sSup` is called `sSup`
* `sInf` is called `sInf`
* `⨆ i, s i` is called `iSup`
* `⨅ i, s i` is called `iInf`
* `⨆ i j, s i j` is called `iSup₂`. This is an `iSup` inside an `iSup`.
* `⨅ i j, s i j` is called `iInf₂`. This is an `iInf` inside an `iInf`.
* `⨆ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biSup` for "bounded `iSup`". This is the special case of `iSup₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⨅ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInf` for "bounded `iInf`". This is the special case of `iInf₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⨆ i, f i` : `iSup f`, the supremum of the range of `f`;
* `⨅ i, f i` : `iInf f`, the infimum of the range of `f`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β β₂ γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
instance OrderDual.supSet (α) [InfSet α] : SupSet αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(sInf : Set α → α)⟩
instance OrderDual.infSet (α) [SupSet α] : InfSet αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(sSup : Set α → α)⟩
/-- Note that we rarely use `CompleteSemilatticeSup`
(in fact, any such object is always a `CompleteLattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
class CompleteSemilatticeSup (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α, SupSet α where
/-- Any element of a set is less than the set supremum. -/
le_sSup : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ sSup s
/-- Any upper bound is more than the set supremum. -/
sSup_le : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → sSup s ≤ a
#align complete_semilattice_Sup CompleteSemilatticeSup
section
variable [CompleteSemilatticeSup α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_sSup : a ∈ s → a ≤ sSup s :=
CompleteSemilatticeSup.le_sSup s a
#align le_Sup le_sSup
theorem sSup_le : (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → sSup s ≤ a :=
CompleteSemilatticeSup.sSup_le s a
#align Sup_le sSup_le
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set α) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ ↦ le_sSup, fun _ ↦ sSup_le⟩
#align is_lub_Sup isLUB_sSup
lemma isLUB_iff_sSup_eq : IsLUB s a ↔ sSup s = a :=
⟨(isLUB_sSup s).unique, by rintro rfl; exact isLUB_sSup _⟩
alias ⟨IsLUB.sSup_eq, _⟩ := isLUB_iff_sSup_eq
#align is_lub.Sup_eq IsLUB.sSup_eq
theorem le_sSup_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_sSup hb)
#align le_Sup_of_le le_sSup_of_le
@[gcongr]
theorem sSup_le_sSup (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
(isLUB_sSup s).mono (isLUB_sSup t) h
#align Sup_le_Sup sSup_le_sSup
@[simp]
theorem sSup_le_iff : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_sSup s)
#align Sup_le_iff sSup_le_iff
theorem le_sSup_iff : a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b ∈ upperBounds s, a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (sSup_le hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_sSup⟩
#align le_Sup_iff le_sSup_iff
theorem le_iSup_iff {s : ι → α} : a ≤ iSup s ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, s i ≤ b) → a ≤ b := by
simp [iSup, le_sSup_iff, upperBounds]
#align le_supr_iff le_iSup_iff
theorem sSup_le_sSup_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
le_sSup_iff.2 fun _ hb =>
sSup_le fun a ha =>
let ⟨_, hct, hac⟩ := h a ha
hac.trans (hb hct)
#align Sup_le_Sup_of_forall_exists_le sSup_le_sSup_of_forall_exists_le
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csSup_singleton`.
theorem sSup_singleton {a : α} : sSup {a} = a :=
isLUB_singleton.sSup_eq
#align Sup_singleton sSup_singleton
end
/-- Note that we rarely use `CompleteSemilatticeInf`
(in fact, any such object is always a `CompleteLattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
class CompleteSemilatticeInf (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α, InfSet α where
/-- Any element of a set is more than the set infimum. -/
sInf_le : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, sInf s ≤ a
/-- Any lower bound is less than the set infimum. -/
le_sInf : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ sInf s
#align complete_semilattice_Inf CompleteSemilatticeInf
section
variable [CompleteSemilatticeInf α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem sInf_le : a ∈ s → sInf s ≤ a :=
CompleteSemilatticeInf.sInf_le s a
#align Inf_le sInf_le
theorem le_sInf : (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ sInf s :=
CompleteSemilatticeInf.le_sInf s a
#align le_Inf le_sInf
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set α) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => sInf_le, fun _ => le_sInf⟩
#align is_glb_Inf isGLB_sInf
lemma isGLB_iff_sInf_eq : IsGLB s a ↔ sInf s = a :=
⟨(isGLB_sInf s).unique, by rintro rfl; exact isGLB_sInf _⟩
alias ⟨IsGLB.sInf_eq, _⟩ := isGLB_iff_sInf_eq
#align is_glb.Inf_eq IsGLB.sInf_eq
theorem sInf_le_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (sInf_le hb) h
#align Inf_le_of_le sInf_le_of_le
@[gcongr]
theorem sInf_le_sInf (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
(isGLB_sInf s).mono (isGLB_sInf t) h
#align Inf_le_Inf sInf_le_sInf
@[simp]
theorem le_sInf_iff : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_sInf s)
#align le_Inf_iff le_sInf_iff
theorem sInf_le_iff : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_sInf hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => sInf_le⟩
#align Inf_le_iff sInf_le_iff
theorem iInf_le_iff {s : ι → α} : iInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, b ≤ s i) → b ≤ a := by
simp [iInf, sInf_le_iff, lowerBounds]
#align infi_le_iff iInf_le_iff
theorem sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_sInf fun x hx ↦ let ⟨_y, hyt, hyx⟩ := h x hx; sInf_le_of_le hyt hyx
#align Inf_le_Inf_of_forall_exists_le sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csInf_singleton`.
theorem sInf_singleton {a : α} : sInf {a} = a :=
isGLB_singleton.sInf_eq
#align Inf_singleton sInf_singleton
end
/-- A complete lattice is a bounded lattice which has suprema and infima for every subset. -/
class CompleteLattice (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, CompleteSemilatticeSup α,
CompleteSemilatticeInf α, Top α, Bot α where
/-- Any element is less than the top one. -/
protected le_top : ∀ x : α, x ≤ ⊤
/-- Any element is more than the bottom one. -/
protected bot_le : ∀ x : α, ⊥ ≤ x
#align complete_lattice CompleteLattice
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toBoundedOrder [h : CompleteLattice α] :
BoundedOrder α :=
{ h with }
#align complete_lattice.to_bounded_order CompleteLattice.toBoundedOrder
/-- Create a `CompleteLattice` from a `PartialOrder` and `InfSet`
that returns the greatest lower bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `CompleteLattice`
instance as
```
instance : CompleteLattice my_T where
inf := better_inf
le_inf := ...
inf_le_right := ...
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, sSup, bot, top
__ := completeLatticeOfInf my_T _
```
-/
def completeLatticeOfInf (α : Type*) [H1 : PartialOrder α] [H2 : InfSet α]
(isGLB_sInf : ∀ s : Set α, IsGLB s (sInf s)) : CompleteLattice α where
__ := H1; __ := H2
bot := sInf univ
bot_le x := (isGLB_sInf univ).1 trivial
top := sInf ∅
le_top a := (isGLB_sInf ∅).2 <| by simp
sup a b := sInf { x : α | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
inf a b := sInf {a, b}
le_inf a b c hab hac := by
apply (isGLB_sInf _).2
simp [*]
inf_le_right a b := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| mem_insert_of_mem _ <| mem_singleton _
inf_le_left a b := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| mem_insert _ _
sup_le a b c hac hbc := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| by simp [*]
le_sup_left a b := (isGLB_sInf _).2 fun x => And.left
le_sup_right a b := (isGLB_sInf _).2 fun x => And.right
le_sInf s a ha := (isGLB_sInf s).2 ha
sInf_le s a ha := (isGLB_sInf s).1 ha
sSup s := sInf (upperBounds s)
le_sSup s a ha := (isGLB_sInf (upperBounds s)).2 fun b hb => hb ha
sSup_le s a ha := (isGLB_sInf (upperBounds s)).1 ha
#align complete_lattice_of_Inf completeLatticeOfInf
/-- Any `CompleteSemilatticeInf` is in fact a `CompleteLattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `completeLatticeOfInf`.
-/
def completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (α : Type*) [CompleteSemilatticeInf α] :
CompleteLattice α :=
completeLatticeOfInf α fun s => isGLB_sInf s
#align complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Inf completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf
/-- Create a `CompleteLattice` from a `PartialOrder` and `SupSet`
that returns the least upper bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `CompleteLattice`
instance as
```
instance : CompleteLattice my_T where
inf := better_inf
le_inf := ...
inf_le_right := ...
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, sInf, bot, top
__ := completeLatticeOfSup my_T _
```
-/
def completeLatticeOfSup (α : Type*) [H1 : PartialOrder α] [H2 : SupSet α]
(isLUB_sSup : ∀ s : Set α, IsLUB s (sSup s)) : CompleteLattice α where
__ := H1; __ := H2
top := sSup univ
le_top x := (isLUB_sSup univ).1 trivial
bot := sSup ∅
bot_le x := (isLUB_sSup ∅).2 <| by simp
sup a b := sSup {a, b}
sup_le a b c hac hbc := (isLUB_sSup _).2 (by simp [*])
le_sup_left a b := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| mem_insert _ _
le_sup_right a b := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| mem_insert_of_mem _ <| mem_singleton _
inf a b := sSup { x | x ≤ a ∧ x ≤ b }
le_inf a b c hab hac := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| by simp [*]
inf_le_left a b := (isLUB_sSup _).2 fun x => And.left
inf_le_right a b := (isLUB_sSup _).2 fun x => And.right
sInf s := sSup (lowerBounds s)
sSup_le s a ha := (isLUB_sSup s).2 ha
le_sSup s a ha := (isLUB_sSup s).1 ha
sInf_le s a ha := (isLUB_sSup (lowerBounds s)).2 fun b hb => hb ha
le_sInf s a ha := (isLUB_sSup (lowerBounds s)).1 ha
#align complete_lattice_of_Sup completeLatticeOfSup
/-- Any `CompleteSemilatticeSup` is in fact a `CompleteLattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `completeLatticeOfSup`.
-/
def completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeSup (α : Type*) [CompleteSemilatticeSup α] :
CompleteLattice α :=
completeLatticeOfSup α fun s => isLUB_sSup s
#align complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Sup completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeSup
-- Porting note: as we cannot rename fields while extending,
-- `CompleteLinearOrder` does not directly extend `LinearOrder`.
-- Instead we add the fields by hand, and write a manual instance.
/-- A complete linear order is a linear order whose lattice structure is complete. -/
class CompleteLinearOrder (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α where
/-- A linear order is total. -/
le_total (a b : α) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLE : DecidableRel (· ≤ · : α → α → Prop)
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableEq : DecidableEq α := @decidableEqOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLT : DecidableRel (· < · : α → α → Prop) :=
@decidableLTOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
#align complete_linear_order CompleteLinearOrder
instance CompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [i : CompleteLinearOrder α] : LinearOrder α where
__ := i
min := Inf.inf
max := Sup.sup
min_def a b := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· simp [(CompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b).resolve_left h]
max_def a b := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· simp [(CompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b).resolve_left h]
namespace OrderDual
instance instCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice αᵒᵈ where
__ := instBoundedOrder α
le_sSup := @CompleteLattice.sInf_le α _
sSup_le := @CompleteLattice.le_sInf α _
sInf_le := @CompleteLattice.le_sSup α _
le_sInf := @CompleteLattice.sSup_le α _
instance instCompleteLinearOrder [CompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := instCompleteLattice
__ := instLinearOrder α
end OrderDual
open OrderDual
section
variable [CompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sSup (s : Set α) : toDual (sSup s) = sInf (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_Sup toDual_sSup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sInf (s : Set α) : toDual (sInf s) = sSup (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_Inf toDual_sInf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sSup (s : Set αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (sSup s) = sInf (toDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_Sup ofDual_sSup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sInf (s : Set αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (sInf s) = sSup (toDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_Inf ofDual_sInf
@[simp]
theorem toDual_iSup (f : ι → α) : toDual (⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, toDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_supr toDual_iSup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_iInf (f : ι → α) : toDual (⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, toDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_infi toDual_iInf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_iSup (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ofDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_supr ofDual_iSup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_iInf (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, ofDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_infi ofDual_iInf
theorem sInf_le_sSup (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_sInf s) (isLUB_sSup s) hs
#align Inf_le_Sup sInf_le_sSup
theorem sSup_union {s t : Set α} : sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_sSup s).union (isLUB_sSup t)).sSup_eq
#align Sup_union sSup_union
theorem sInf_union {s t : Set α} : sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
((isGLB_sInf s).union (isGLB_sInf t)).sInf_eq
#align Inf_union sInf_union
theorem sSup_inter_le {s t : Set α} : sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
sSup_le fun _ hb => le_inf (le_sSup hb.1) (le_sSup hb.2)
#align Sup_inter_le sSup_inter_le
theorem le_sInf_inter {s t : Set α} : sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
@sSup_inter_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align le_Inf_inter le_sInf_inter
@[simp]
theorem sSup_empty : sSup ∅ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@isLUB_empty α _ _).sSup_eq
#align Sup_empty sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@isGLB_empty α _ _).sInf_eq
#align Inf_empty sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sSup_univ : sSup univ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@isLUB_univ α _ _).sSup_eq
#align Sup_univ sSup_univ
@[simp]
theorem sInf_univ : sInf univ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@isGLB_univ α _ _).sInf_eq
#align Inf_univ sInf_univ
-- TODO(Jeremy): get this automatically
@[simp]
theorem sSup_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_sSup s).insert a).sSup_eq
#align Sup_insert sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInf_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
((isGLB_sInf s).insert a).sInf_eq
#align Inf_insert sInf_insert
theorem sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot (h : s ⊆ insert ⊥ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
(sSup_le_sSup h).trans_eq (sSup_insert.trans (bot_sup_eq _))
#align Sup_le_Sup_of_subset_insert_bot sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot
theorem sInf_le_sInf_of_subset_insert_top (h : s ⊆ insert ⊤ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
(sInf_le_sInf h).trans_eq' (sInf_insert.trans (top_inf_eq _)).symm
#align Inf_le_Inf_of_subset_insert_top sInf_le_sInf_of_subset_insert_top
@[simp]
theorem sSup_diff_singleton_bot (s : Set α) : sSup (s \ {⊥}) = sSup s :=
(sSup_le_sSup diff_subset).antisymm <|
sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot <| subset_insert_diff_singleton _ _
#align Sup_diff_singleton_bot sSup_diff_singleton_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_diff_singleton_top (s : Set α) : sInf (s \ {⊤}) = sInf s :=
@sSup_diff_singleton_bot αᵒᵈ _ s
#align Inf_diff_singleton_top sInf_diff_singleton_top
theorem sSup_pair {a b : α} : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair α _ a b).sSup_eq
#align Sup_pair sSup_pair
theorem sInf_pair {a b : α} : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair α _ a b).sInf_eq
#align Inf_pair sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sSup_eq_bot : sSup s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h _ ha => bot_unique <| h ▸ le_sSup ha, fun h =>
bot_unique <| sSup_le fun a ha => le_bot_iff.2 <| h a ha⟩
#align Sup_eq_bot sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_top : sInf s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊤ :=
@sSup_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_top sInf_eq_top
theorem eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty {s : Set α} (h_sup : sSup s = ⊥)
(hne : s.Nonempty) : s = {⊥} := by
rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem]
rw [sSup_eq_bot] at h_sup
exact ⟨hne, h_sup⟩
#align eq_singleton_bot_of_Sup_eq_bot_of_nonempty eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty
theorem eq_singleton_top_of_sInf_eq_top_of_nonempty : sInf s = ⊤ → s.Nonempty → s = {⊤} :=
@eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty αᵒᵈ _ _
#align eq_singleton_top_of_Inf_eq_top_of_nonempty eq_singleton_top_of_sInf_eq_top_of_nonempty
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w < b`.
See `csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (h₁ : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(sSup_le h₁).eq_of_not_lt fun h =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := h₂ _ h
((le_sSup ha).trans_lt ha').false
#align Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w > b`.
See `csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
(∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
@sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align Inf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
end
section CompleteLinearOrder
variable [CompleteLinearOrder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_sSup_iff : b < sSup s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b < a :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_sSup s
#align lt_Sup_iff lt_sSup_iff
theorem sInf_lt_iff : sInf s < b ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_sInf s
#align Inf_lt_iff sInf_lt_iff
theorem sSup_eq_top : sSup s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ b < ⊤, ∃ a ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => lt_sSup_iff.1 <| hb.trans_eq h.symm, fun h =>
top_unique <|
le_of_not_gt fun h' =>
let ⟨_, ha, h⟩ := h _ h'
(h.trans_le <| le_sSup ha).false⟩
#align Sup_eq_top sSup_eq_top
theorem sInf_eq_bot : sInf s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b > ⊥, ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
@sSup_eq_top αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_bot sInf_eq_bot
theorem lt_iSup_iff {f : ι → α} : a < iSup f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i :=
lt_sSup_iff.trans exists_range_iff
#align lt_supr_iff lt_iSup_iff
theorem iInf_lt_iff {f : ι → α} : iInf f < a ↔ ∃ i, f i < a :=
sInf_lt_iff.trans exists_range_iff
#align infi_lt_iff iInf_lt_iff
end CompleteLinearOrder
/-
### iSup & iInf
-/
section SupSet
variable [SupSet α] {f g : ι → α}
theorem sSup_range : sSup (range f) = iSup f :=
rfl
#align Sup_range sSup_range
theorem sSup_eq_iSup' (s : Set α) : sSup s = ⨆ a : s, (a : α) := by rw [iSup, Subtype.range_coe]
#align Sup_eq_supr' sSup_eq_iSup'
theorem iSup_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : ⨆ i, f i = ⨆ i, g i :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align supr_congr iSup_congr
theorem biSup_congr {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∀ i, p i → f i = g i) :
⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), g i :=
iSup_congr fun i ↦ iSup_congr (h i)
theorem biSup_congr' {p : ι → Prop} {f g : (i : ι) → p i → α}
(h : ∀ i (hi : p i), f i hi = g i hi) :
⨆ i, ⨆ (hi : p i), f i hi = ⨆ i, ⨆ (hi : p i), g i hi := by
congr; ext i; congr; ext hi; exact h i hi
theorem Function.Surjective.iSup_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
⨆ x, g (f x) = ⨆ y, g y := by
simp only [iSup.eq_1]
congr
exact hf.range_comp g
#align function.surjective.supr_comp Function.Surjective.iSup_comp
theorem Equiv.iSup_comp {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') : ⨆ x, g (e x) = ⨆ y, g y :=
e.surjective.iSup_comp _
#align equiv.supr_comp Equiv.iSup_comp
protected theorem Function.Surjective.iSup_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ y, g y := by
convert h1.iSup_comp g
exact (h2 _).symm
#align function.surjective.supr_congr Function.Surjective.iSup_congr
protected theorem Equiv.iSup_congr {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (h : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
⨆ x, f x = ⨆ y, g y :=
e.surjective.iSup_congr _ h
#align equiv.supr_congr Equiv.iSup_congr
@[congr]
theorem iSup_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iSup f₁ = iSup f₂ := by
obtain rfl := propext pq
congr with x
apply f
#align supr_congr_Prop iSup_congr_Prop
theorem iSup_plift_up (f : PLift ι → α) : ⨆ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
(PLift.up_surjective.iSup_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align supr_plift_up iSup_plift_up
theorem iSup_plift_down (f : ι → α) : ⨆ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
(PLift.down_surjective.iSup_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align supr_plift_down iSup_plift_down
theorem iSup_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : ⨆ b : range f, g b = ⨆ i, g (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, ← image_eq_range, ← range_comp]
rfl
#align supr_range' iSup_range'
theorem sSup_image' {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sSup (f '' s) = ⨆ a : s, f a := by
rw [iSup, image_eq_range]
#align Sup_image' sSup_image'
end SupSet
section InfSet
variable [InfSet α] {f g : ι → α}
theorem sInf_range : sInf (range f) = iInf f :=
rfl
#align Inf_range sInf_range
theorem sInf_eq_iInf' (s : Set α) : sInf s = ⨅ a : s, (a : α) :=
@sSup_eq_iSup' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_infi' sInf_eq_iInf'
theorem iInf_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : ⨅ i, f i = ⨅ i, g i :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align infi_congr iInf_congr
theorem biInf_congr {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∀ i, p i → f i = g i) :
⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), g i :=
biSup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem biInf_congr' {p : ι → Prop} {f g : (i : ι) → p i → α}
(h : ∀ i (hi : p i), f i hi = g i hi) :
⨅ i, ⨅ (hi : p i), f i hi = ⨅ i, ⨅ (hi : p i), g i hi := by
congr; ext i; congr; ext hi; exact h i hi
theorem Function.Surjective.iInf_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
⨅ x, g (f x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Function.Surjective.iSup_comp αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f hf g
#align function.surjective.infi_comp Function.Surjective.iInf_comp
theorem Equiv.iInf_comp {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') : ⨅ x, g (e x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Equiv.iSup_comp αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ e
#align equiv.infi_comp Equiv.iInf_comp
protected theorem Function.Surjective.iInf_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Function.Surjective.iSup_congr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h h1 h2
#align function.surjective.infi_congr Function.Surjective.iInf_congr
protected theorem Equiv.iInf_congr {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (h : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
⨅ x, f x = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Equiv.iSup_congr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ e h
#align equiv.infi_congr Equiv.iInf_congr
@[congr]
theorem iInf_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInf f₁ = iInf f₂ :=
@iSup_congr_Prop αᵒᵈ _ p q f₁ f₂ pq f
#align infi_congr_Prop iInf_congr_Prop
theorem iInf_plift_up (f : PLift ι → α) : ⨅ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
(PLift.up_surjective.iInf_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align infi_plift_up iInf_plift_up
theorem iInf_plift_down (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
(PLift.down_surjective.iInf_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align infi_plift_down iInf_plift_down
theorem iInf_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : ⨅ b : range f, g b = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
@iSup_range' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align infi_range' iInf_range'
theorem sInf_image' {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sInf (f '' s) = ⨅ a : s, f a :=
@sSup_image' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align Inf_image' sInf_image'
end InfSet
section
variable [CompleteLattice α] {f g s t : ι → α} {a b : α}
theorem le_iSup (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : f i ≤ iSup f :=
le_sSup ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align le_supr le_iSup
theorem iInf_le (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : iInf f ≤ f i :=
sInf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align infi_le iInf_le
theorem le_iSup' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : f i ≤ iSup f :=
le_sSup ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align le_supr' le_iSup'
theorem iInf_le' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : iInf f ≤ f i :=
sInf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align infi_le' iInf_le'
theorem isLUB_iSup : IsLUB (range f) (⨆ j, f j) :=
isLUB_sSup _
#align is_lub_supr isLUB_iSup
theorem isGLB_iInf : IsGLB (range f) (⨅ j, f j) :=
isGLB_sInf _
#align is_glb_infi isGLB_iInf
theorem IsLUB.iSup_eq (h : IsLUB (range f) a) : ⨆ j, f j = a :=
h.sSup_eq
#align is_lub.supr_eq IsLUB.iSup_eq
theorem IsGLB.iInf_eq (h : IsGLB (range f) a) : ⨅ j, f j = a :=
h.sInf_eq
#align is_glb.infi_eq IsGLB.iInf_eq
theorem le_iSup_of_le (i : ι) (h : a ≤ f i) : a ≤ iSup f :=
h.trans <| le_iSup _ i
#align le_supr_of_le le_iSup_of_le
theorem iInf_le_of_le (i : ι) (h : f i ≤ a) : iInf f ≤ a :=
(iInf_le _ i).trans h
#align infi_le_of_le iInf_le_of_le
theorem le_iSup₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j :=
le_iSup_of_le i <| le_iSup (f i) j
#align le_supr₂ le_iSup₂
theorem iInf₂_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ f i j :=
iInf_le_of_le i <| iInf_le (f i) j
#align infi₂_le iInf₂_le
theorem le_iSup₂_of_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : a ≤ f i j) :
a ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j :=
h.trans <| le_iSup₂ i j
#align le_supr₂_of_le le_iSup₂_of_le
theorem iInf₂_le_of_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : f i j ≤ a) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a :=
(iInf₂_le i j).trans h
#align infi₂_le_of_le iInf₂_le_of_le
theorem iSup_le (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) : iSup f ≤ a :=
sSup_le fun _ ⟨i, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ h i
#align supr_le iSup_le
theorem le_iInf (h : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) : a ≤ iInf f :=
le_sInf fun _ ⟨i, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ h i
#align le_infi le_iInf
theorem iSup₂_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a) : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a :=
iSup_le fun i => iSup_le <| h i
#align supr₂_le iSup₂_le
theorem le_iInf₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j) : a ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j :=
le_iInf fun i => le_iInf <| h i
#align le_infi₂ le_iInf₂
theorem iSup₂_le_iSup (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : ⨆ (i) (_ : κ i), f i ≤ ⨆ i, f i :=
iSup₂_le fun i _ => le_iSup f i
#align supr₂_le_supr iSup₂_le_iSup
theorem iInf_le_iInf₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i, f i ≤ ⨅ (i) (_ : κ i), f i :=
le_iInf₂ fun i _ => iInf_le f i
#align infi_le_infi₂ iInf_le_iInf₂
@[gcongr]
theorem iSup_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : iSup f ≤ iSup g :=
iSup_le fun i => le_iSup_of_le i <| h i
#align supr_mono iSup_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInf_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : iInf f ≤ iInf g :=
le_iInf fun i => iInf_le_of_le i <| h i
#align infi_mono iInf_mono
theorem iSup₂_mono {f g : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) :
⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), g i j :=
iSup_mono fun i => iSup_mono <| h i
#align supr₂_mono iSup₂_mono
theorem iInf₂_mono {f g : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), g i j :=
iInf_mono fun i => iInf_mono <| h i
#align infi₂_mono iInf₂_mono
theorem iSup_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ i', f i ≤ g i') : iSup f ≤ iSup g :=
iSup_le fun i => Exists.elim (h i) le_iSup_of_le
#align supr_mono' iSup_mono'
theorem iInf_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i', ∃ i, f i ≤ g i') : iInf f ≤ iInf g :=
le_iInf fun i' => Exists.elim (h i') iInf_le_of_le
#align infi_mono' iInf_mono'
theorem iSup₂_mono' {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} {g : ∀ i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i j ≤ g i' j') :
⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), g i j :=
iSup₂_le fun i j =>
let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j
le_iSup₂_of_le i' j' h
#align supr₂_mono' iSup₂_mono'
theorem iInf₂_mono' {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} {g : ∀ i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i' j' ≤ g i j) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), g i j :=
le_iInf₂ fun i j =>
let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j
iInf₂_le_of_le i' j' h
#align infi₂_mono' iInf₂_mono'
theorem iSup_const_mono (h : ι → ι') : ⨆ _ : ι, a ≤ ⨆ _ : ι', a :=
iSup_le <| le_iSup _ ∘ h
#align supr_const_mono iSup_const_mono
theorem iInf_const_mono (h : ι' → ι) : ⨅ _ : ι, a ≤ ⨅ _ : ι', a :=
le_iInf <| iInf_le _ ∘ h
#align infi_const_mono iInf_const_mono
theorem iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (f : ι → ι' → α) : ⨆ i, ⨅ j, f i j ≤ ⨅ j, ⨆ i, f i j :=
iSup_le fun i => iInf_mono fun j => le_iSup (fun i => f i j) i
#align supr_infi_le_infi_supr iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup
theorem biSup_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i ≤ ⨆ (i) (_ : q i), f i :=
iSup_mono fun i => iSup_const_mono (hpq i)
#align bsupr_mono biSup_mono
theorem biInf_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
⨅ (i) (_ : q i), f i ≤ ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i :=
iInf_mono fun i => iInf_const_mono (hpq i)
#align binfi_mono biInf_mono
@[simp]
theorem iSup_le_iff : iSup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff isLUB_iSup).trans forall_mem_range
#align supr_le_iff iSup_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem le_iInf_iff : a ≤ iInf f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
(le_isGLB_iff isGLB_iInf).trans forall_mem_range
#align le_infi_iff le_iInf_iff
theorem iSup₂_le_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a ↔ ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_le_iff]
#align supr₂_le_iff iSup₂_le_iff
theorem le_iInf₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : (a ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j := by
simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
#align le_infi₂_iff le_iInf₂_iff
theorem iSup_lt_iff : iSup f < a ↔ ∃ b, b < a ∧ ∀ i, f i ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨iSup f, h, le_iSup f⟩, fun ⟨_, h, hb⟩ => (iSup_le hb).trans_lt h⟩
#align supr_lt_iff iSup_lt_iff
theorem lt_iInf_iff : a < iInf f ↔ ∃ b, a < b ∧ ∀ i, b ≤ f i :=
⟨fun h => ⟨iInf f, h, iInf_le f⟩, fun ⟨_, h, hb⟩ => h.trans_le <| le_iInf hb⟩
#align lt_infi_iff lt_iInf_iff
theorem sSup_eq_iSup {s : Set α} : sSup s = ⨆ a ∈ s, a :=
le_antisymm (sSup_le le_iSup₂) (iSup₂_le fun _ => le_sSup)
#align Sup_eq_supr sSup_eq_iSup
theorem sInf_eq_iInf {s : Set α} : sInf s = ⨅ a ∈ s, a :=
@sSup_eq_iSup αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_infi sInf_eq_iInf
theorem Monotone.le_map_iSup [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
⨆ i, f (s i) ≤ f (iSup s) :=
iSup_le fun _ => hf <| le_iSup _ _
#align monotone.le_map_supr Monotone.le_map_iSup
theorem Antitone.le_map_iInf [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
⨆ i, f (s i) ≤ f (iInf s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_iSup
#align antitone.le_map_infi Antitone.le_map_iInf
theorem Monotone.le_map_iSup₂ [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
⨆ (i) (j), f (s i j) ≤ f (⨆ (i) (j), s i j) :=
iSup₂_le fun _ _ => hf <| le_iSup₂ _ _
#align monotone.le_map_supr₂ Monotone.le_map_iSup₂
theorem Antitone.le_map_iInf₂ [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
⨆ (i) (j), f (s i j) ≤ f (⨅ (i) (j), s i j) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align antitone.le_map_infi₂ Antitone.le_map_iInf₂
theorem Monotone.le_map_sSup [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
⨆ a ∈ s, f a ≤ f (sSup s) := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup]; exact hf.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align monotone.le_map_Sup Monotone.le_map_sSup
theorem Antitone.le_map_sInf [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
⨆ a ∈ s, f a ≤ f (sInf s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_sSup
#align antitone.le_map_Inf Antitone.le_map_sInf
theorem OrderIso.map_iSup [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨆ i, x i) = ⨆ i, f (x i) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff <| f.surjective.forall.2
fun x => by simp only [f.le_iff_le, iSup_le_iff]
#align order_iso.map_supr OrderIso.map_iSup
theorem OrderIso.map_iInf [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨅ i, x i) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
OrderIso.map_iSup f.dual _
#align order_iso.map_infi OrderIso.map_iInf
theorem OrderIso.map_sSup [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sSup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, OrderIso.map_iSup]
#align order_iso.map_Sup OrderIso.map_sSup
theorem OrderIso.map_sInf [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sInf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
OrderIso.map_sSup f.dual _
#align order_iso.map_Inf OrderIso.map_sInf
theorem iSup_comp_le {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : ⨆ x, f (g x) ≤ ⨆ y, f y :=
iSup_mono' fun _ => ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
#align supr_comp_le iSup_comp_le
theorem le_iInf_comp {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : ⨅ y, f y ≤ ⨅ x, f (g x) :=
iInf_mono' fun _ => ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
#align le_infi_comp le_iInf_comp
theorem Monotone.iSup_comp_eq [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {s : ι → β}
(hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ≤ s i) : ⨆ x, f (s x) = ⨆ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (iSup_comp_le _ _) (iSup_mono' fun x => (hs x).imp fun _ hi => hf hi)
#align monotone.supr_comp_eq Monotone.iSup_comp_eq
theorem Monotone.iInf_comp_eq [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {s : ι → β}
(hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, s i ≤ x) : ⨅ x, f (s x) = ⨅ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (iInf_mono' fun x => (hs x).imp fun _ hi => hf hi) (le_iInf_comp _ _)
#align monotone.infi_comp_eq Monotone.iInf_comp_eq
theorem Antitone.map_iSup_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
f (iSup s) ≤ ⨅ i, f (s i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => hf <| le_iSup _ _
#align antitone.map_supr_le Antitone.map_iSup_le
theorem Monotone.map_iInf_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
f (iInf s) ≤ ⨅ i, f (s i) :=
hf.dual_left.map_iSup_le
#align monotone.map_infi_le Monotone.map_iInf_le
theorem Antitone.map_iSup₂_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨆ (i) (j), s i j) ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f (s i j) :=
hf.dual.le_map_iInf₂ _
#align antitone.map_supr₂_le Antitone.map_iSup₂_le
theorem Monotone.map_iInf₂_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨅ (i) (j), s i j) ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f (s i j) :=
hf.dual.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align monotone.map_infi₂_le Monotone.map_iInf₂_le
theorem Antitone.map_sSup_le [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
f (sSup s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup]
exact hf.map_iSup₂_le _
#align antitone.map_Sup_le Antitone.map_sSup_le
theorem Monotone.map_sInf_le [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
f (sInf s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
hf.dual_left.map_sSup_le
#align monotone.map_Inf_le Monotone.map_sInf_le
theorem iSup_const_le : ⨆ _ : ι, a ≤ a :=
iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl
#align supr_const_le iSup_const_le
theorem le_iInf_const : a ≤ ⨅ _ : ι, a :=
le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
#align le_infi_const le_iInf_const
-- We generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `ciSup_const` and `ciInf_const`.
theorem iSup_const [Nonempty ι] : ⨆ _ : ι, a = a := by rw [iSup, range_const, sSup_singleton]
#align supr_const iSup_const
theorem iInf_const [Nonempty ι] : ⨅ _ : ι, a = a :=
@iSup_const αᵒᵈ _ _ a _
#align infi_const iInf_const
@[simp]
theorem iSup_bot : (⨆ _ : ι, ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique iSup_const_le
#align supr_bot iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInf_top : (⨅ _ : ι, ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique le_iInf_const
#align infi_top iInf_top
@[simp]
theorem iSup_eq_bot : iSup s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊥ :=
sSup_eq_bot.trans forall_mem_range
#align supr_eq_bot iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInf_eq_top : iInf s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊤ :=
sInf_eq_top.trans forall_mem_range
#align infi_eq_top iInf_eq_top
theorem iSup₂_eq_bot {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊥ := by
simp
#align supr₂_eq_bot iSup₂_eq_bot
theorem iInf₂_eq_top {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊤ := by
simp
#align infi₂_eq_top iInf₂_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem iSup_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : ⨆ h : p, f h = f hp :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl) (le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_pos iSup_pos
@[simp]
theorem iInf_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : ⨅ h : p, f h = f hp :=
le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl)
#align infi_pos iInf_pos
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬p) : ⨆ h : p, f h = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun h => (hp h).elim) bot_le
#align supr_neg iSup_neg
@[simp]
theorem iInf_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬p) : ⨅ h : p, f h = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top <| le_iInf fun h => (hp h).elim
#align infi_neg iInf_neg
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `ciSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt {f : ι → α} (h₁ : ∀ i, f i ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ i, w < f i) : ⨆ i : ι, f i = b :=
sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (forall_mem_range.mpr h₁) fun w hw =>
exists_range_iff.mpr <| h₂ w hw
#align supr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
(∀ i, b ≤ f i) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ i, f i < w) → ⨅ i, f i = b :=
@iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
theorem iSup_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : p → α) :
⨆ h : p, a h = if h : p then a h else ⊥ := by by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
#align supr_eq_dif iSup_eq_dif
theorem iSup_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : α) : ⨆ _ : p, a = if p then a else ⊥ :=
iSup_eq_dif fun _ => a
#align supr_eq_if iSup_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : p → α) :
⨅ h : p, a h = if h : p then a h else ⊤ :=
@iSup_eq_dif αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_eq_dif iInf_eq_dif
theorem iInf_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : α) : ⨅ _ : p, a = if p then a else ⊤ :=
iInf_eq_dif fun _ => a
#align infi_eq_if iInf_eq_if
theorem iSup_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j = ⨆ (j) (i), f i j :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun i => iSup_mono fun j => le_iSup (fun i => f i j) i)
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_mono fun _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_comm iSup_comm
theorem iInf_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j = ⨅ (j) (i), f i j :=
@iSup_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_comm iInf_comm
theorem iSup₂_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
(f : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → α) :
⨆ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⨆ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@iSup_comm _ (κ₁ _), @iSup_comm _ ι₁]
#align supr₂_comm iSup₂_comm
theorem iInf₂_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
(f : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → α) :
⨅ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⨅ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@iInf_comm _ (κ₁ _), @iInf_comm _ ι₁]
#align infi₂_comm iInf₂_comm
/- TODO: this is strange. In the proof below, we get exactly the desired
among the equalities, but close does not get it.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
simp, intros,
begin [smt]
ematch, ematch, ematch, trace_state, have := le_refl (f i_1 i),
trace_state, close
end
end
-/
@[simp]
theorem iSup_iSup_eq_left {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, x = b → α} : ⨆ x, ⨆ h : x = b, f x h = f b rfl :=
(@le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ f b rfl).antisymm'
(iSup_le fun c =>
iSup_le <| by
rintro rfl
rfl)
#align supr_supr_eq_left iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInf_iInf_eq_left {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, x = b → α} : ⨅ x, ⨅ h : x = b, f x h = f b rfl :=
@iSup_iSup_eq_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_infi_eq_left iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iSup_iSup_eq_right {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, b = x → α} : ⨆ x, ⨆ h : b = x, f x h = f b rfl :=
(le_iSup₂ b rfl).antisymm'
(iSup₂_le fun c => by
rintro rfl
rfl)
#align supr_supr_eq_right iSup_iSup_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iInf_iInf_eq_right {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, b = x → α} : ⨅ x, ⨅ h : b = x, f x h = f b rfl :=
@iSup_iSup_eq_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_infi_eq_right iInf_iInf_eq_right
theorem iSup_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : Subtype p → α} : iSup f = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ p _ (fun i h => f ⟨i, h⟩) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_subtype iSup_subtype
theorem iInf_subtype : ∀ {p : ι → Prop} {f : Subtype p → α}, iInf f = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
@iSup_subtype αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_subtype iInf_subtype
theorem iSup_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
⨆ (i) (h), f i h = ⨆ x : Subtype p, f x x.property :=
(@iSup_subtype _ _ _ p fun x => f x.val x.property).symm
#align supr_subtype' iSup_subtype'
theorem iInf_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h = ⨅ x : Subtype p, f x x.property :=
(@iInf_subtype _ _ _ p fun x => f x.val x.property).symm
#align infi_subtype' iInf_subtype'
theorem iSup_subtype'' {ι} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : ⨆ i : s, f i = ⨆ (t : ι) (_ : t ∈ s), f t :=
iSup_subtype
#align supr_subtype'' iSup_subtype''
theorem iInf_subtype'' {ι} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i : s, f i = ⨅ (t : ι) (_ : t ∈ s), f t :=
iInf_subtype
#align infi_subtype'' iInf_subtype''
theorem biSup_const {ι : Sort _} {a : α} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ⨆ i ∈ s, a = a := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.nonempty_coe_sort.mpr hs
rw [← iSup_subtype'', iSup_const]
#align bsupr_const biSup_const
theorem biInf_const {ι : Sort _} {a : α} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ⨅ i ∈ s, a = a :=
@biSup_const αᵒᵈ _ ι _ s hs
#align binfi_const biInf_const
theorem iSup_sup_eq : ⨆ x, f x ⊔ g x = (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ ⨆ x, g x :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun _ => sup_le_sup (le_iSup _ _) <| le_iSup _ _)
(sup_le (iSup_mono fun _ => le_sup_left) <| iSup_mono fun _ => le_sup_right)
#align supr_sup_eq iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInf_inf_eq : ⨅ x, f x ⊓ g x = (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ ⨅ x, g x :=
@iSup_sup_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_inf_eq iInf_inf_eq
lemma Equiv.biSup_comp {ι ι' : Type*} {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (s : Set ι') :
⨆ i ∈ e.symm '' s, g (e i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, g i := by
simpa only [iSup_subtype'] using (image e.symm s).symm.iSup_comp (g := g ∘ (↑))
lemma Equiv.biInf_comp {ι ι' : Type*} {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (s : Set ι') :
⨅ i ∈ e.symm '' s, g (e i) = ⨅ i ∈ s, g i :=
e.biSup_comp s (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma biInf_le {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
⨅ i ∈ s, f i ≤ f i := by
simpa only [iInf_subtype'] using iInf_le (ι := s) (f := f ∘ (↑)) ⟨i, hi⟩
lemma le_biSup {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
f i ≤ ⨆ i ∈ s, f i :=
biInf_le (α := αᵒᵈ) f hi
/- TODO: here is another example where more flexible pattern matching
might help.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
safe, pose h := f a ⊓ g a, begin [smt] ematch, ematch end
end
-/
theorem iSup_sup [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ a = ⨆ x, f x ⊔ a := by
rw [iSup_sup_eq, iSup_const]
#align supr_sup iSup_sup
theorem iInf_inf [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ a = ⨅ x, f x ⊓ a := by
rw [iInf_inf_eq, iInf_const]
#align infi_inf iInf_inf
theorem sup_iSup [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (a ⊔ ⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ x, a ⊔ f x := by
rw [iSup_sup_eq, iSup_const]
#align sup_supr sup_iSup
theorem inf_iInf [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (a ⊓ ⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ x, a ⊓ f x := by
rw [iInf_inf_eq, iInf_const]
#align inf_infi inf_iInf
theorem biSup_sup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ a = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h ⊔ a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h
⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩
rw [iSup_subtype', iSup_subtype', iSup_sup]
#align bsupr_sup biSup_sup
theorem sup_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(a ⊔ ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), a ⊔ f i h := by
simpa only [sup_comm] using @biSup_sup α _ _ p _ _ h
#align sup_bsupr sup_biSup
theorem biInf_inf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ a = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h ⊓ a :=
@biSup_sup αᵒᵈ ι _ p f _ h
#align binfi_inf biInf_inf
theorem inf_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(a ⊓ ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), a ⊓ f i h :=
@sup_biSup αᵒᵈ ι _ p f _ h
#align inf_binfi inf_biInf
/-! ### `iSup` and `iInf` under `Prop` -/
theorem iSup_false {s : False → α} : iSup s = ⊥ := by simp
#align supr_false iSup_false
theorem iInf_false {s : False → α} : iInf s = ⊤ := by simp
#align infi_false iInf_false
theorem iSup_true {s : True → α} : iSup s = s trivial :=
iSup_pos trivial
#align supr_true iSup_true
theorem iInf_true {s : True → α} : iInf s = s trivial :=
iInf_pos trivial
#align infi_true iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iSup_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ (i) (h), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => _) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_exists iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iInf_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ (i) (h), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
@iSup_exists αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_exists iInf_exists
theorem iSup_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : iSup s = ⨆ (h₁) (h₂), s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => _) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_and iSup_and
theorem iInf_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : iInf s = ⨅ (h₁) (h₂), s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
@iSup_and αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_and iInf_and
/-- The symmetric case of `iSup_and`, useful for rewriting into a supremum over a conjunction -/
theorem iSup_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
⨆ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂ = ⨆ h : p ∧ q, s h.1 h.2 :=
Eq.symm iSup_and
#align supr_and' iSup_and'
/-- The symmetric case of `iInf_and`, useful for rewriting into an infimum over a conjunction -/
theorem iInf_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
⨅ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂ = ⨅ h : p ∧ q, s h.1 h.2 :=
Eq.symm iInf_and
#align infi_and' iInf_and'
theorem iSup_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
⨆ x, s x = (⨆ i, s (Or.inl i)) ⊔ ⨆ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i =>
match i with
| Or.inl _ => le_sup_of_le_left <| le_iSup (fun _ => s _) _
| Or.inr _ => le_sup_of_le_right <| le_iSup (fun _ => s _) _)
(sup_le (iSup_comp_le _ _) (iSup_comp_le _ _))
#align supr_or iSup_or
theorem iInf_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
⨅ x, s x = (⨅ i, s (Or.inl i)) ⊓ ⨅ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
@iSup_or αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_or iInf_or
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iSup_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → α) :
⨆ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (h : ¬p i),
g i h := by
rw [← iSup_sup_eq]
congr 1 with i
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align supr_dite iSup_dite
theorem iInf_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → α) :
⨅ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite p (show ∀ i, p i → αᵒᵈ from f) g
#align infi_dite iInf_dite
theorem iSup_ite (f g : ι → α) :
⨆ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align supr_ite iSup_ite
theorem iInf_ite (f g : ι → α) :
⨅ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align infi_ite iInf_ite
end
theorem iSup_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : ⨆ b ∈ range f, g b = ⨆ i, g (f i) := by
rw [← iSup_subtype'', iSup_range']
#align supr_range iSup_range
theorem iInf_range : ∀ {g : β → α} {f : ι → β}, ⨅ b ∈ range f, g b = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
@iSup_range αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align infi_range iInf_range
theorem sSup_image {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sSup (f '' s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [← iSup_subtype'', sSup_image']
#align Sup_image sSup_image
theorem sInf_image {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sInf (f '' s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
@sSup_image αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align Inf_image sInf_image
theorem OrderIso.map_sSup_eq_sSup_symm_preimage [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sSup s) = sSup (f.symm ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map_sSup, ← sSup_image, f.image_eq_preimage]
theorem OrderIso.map_sInf_eq_sInf_symm_preimage [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sInf s) = sInf (f.symm ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map_sInf, ← sInf_image, f.image_eq_preimage]
/-
### iSup and iInf under set constructions
-/
theorem iSup_emptyset {f : β → α} : ⨆ x ∈ (∅ : Set β), f x = ⊥ := by simp
#align supr_emptyset iSup_emptyset
theorem iInf_emptyset {f : β → α} : ⨅ x ∈ (∅ : Set β), f x = ⊤ := by simp
#align infi_emptyset iInf_emptyset
theorem iSup_univ {f : β → α} : ⨆ x ∈ (univ : Set β), f x = ⨆ x, f x := by simp
#align supr_univ iSup_univ
theorem iInf_univ {f : β → α} : ⨅ x ∈ (univ : Set β), f x = ⨅ x, f x := by simp
#align infi_univ iInf_univ
theorem iSup_union {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} :
⨆ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x = (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) ⊔ ⨆ x ∈ t, f x := by
simp_rw [mem_union, iSup_or, iSup_sup_eq]
#align supr_union iSup_union
theorem iInf_union {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} : ⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x = (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) ⊓ ⨅ x ∈ t, f x :=
@iSup_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align infi_union iInf_union
theorem iSup_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
⨆ i, f i = (⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (_ : ¬p i), f i := by
simpa [Classical.em] using @iSup_union _ _ _ f { i | p i } { i | ¬p i }
#align supr_split iSup_split
theorem iInf_split :
∀ (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop), ⨅ i, f i = (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (_ : ¬p i), f i :=
@iSup_split αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_split iInf_split
theorem iSup_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) : ⨆ i, f i = f i₀ ⊔ ⨆ (i) (_ : i ≠ i₀), f i := by
convert iSup_split f (fun i => i = i₀)
simp
#align supr_split_single iSup_split_single
theorem iInf_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) : ⨅ i, f i = f i₀ ⊓ ⨅ (i) (_ : i ≠ i₀), f i :=
@iSup_split_single αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_split_single iInf_split_single
theorem iSup_le_iSup_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} : s ⊆ t → ⨆ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ⨆ x ∈ t, f x :=
biSup_mono
#align supr_le_supr_of_subset iSup_le_iSup_of_subset
theorem iInf_le_iInf_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} : s ⊆ t → ⨅ x ∈ t, f x ≤ ⨅ x ∈ s, f x :=
biInf_mono
#align infi_le_infi_of_subset iInf_le_iInf_of_subset
theorem iSup_insert {f : β → α} {s : Set β} {b : β} :
⨆ x ∈ insert b s, f x = f b ⊔ ⨆ x ∈ s, f x :=
Eq.trans iSup_union <| congr_arg (fun x => x ⊔ ⨆ x ∈ s, f x) iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align supr_insert iSup_insert
theorem iInf_insert {f : β → α} {s : Set β} {b : β} :
⨅ x ∈ insert b s, f x = f b ⊓ ⨅ x ∈ s, f x :=
Eq.trans iInf_union <| congr_arg (fun x => x ⊓ ⨅ x ∈ s, f x) iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align infi_insert iInf_insert
theorem iSup_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : ⨆ x ∈ (singleton b : Set β), f x = f b := by simp
#align supr_singleton iSup_singleton
theorem iInf_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : ⨅ x ∈ (singleton b : Set β), f x = f b := by simp
#align infi_singleton iInf_singleton
theorem iSup_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : ⨆ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set β), f x = f a ⊔ f b := by
rw [iSup_insert, iSup_singleton]
#align supr_pair iSup_pair
theorem iInf_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : ⨅ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set β), f x = f a ⊓ f b := by
rw [iInf_insert, iInf_singleton]
#align infi_pair iInf_pair
theorem iSup_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : Set β} :
⨆ c ∈ f '' t, g c = ⨆ b ∈ t, g (f b) := by rw [← sSup_image, ← sSup_image, ← image_comp]; rfl
#align supr_image iSup_image
theorem iInf_image :
∀ {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : Set β}, ⨅ c ∈ f '' t, g c = ⨅ b ∈ t, g (f b) :=
@iSup_image αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_image iInf_image
theorem iSup_extend_bot {e : ι → β} (he : Injective e) (f : ι → α) :
⨆ j, extend e f ⊥ j = ⨆ i, f i := by
rw [iSup_split _ fun j => ∃ i, e i = j]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [he.extend_apply, extend_apply', @iSup_comm _ β ι]
#align supr_extend_bot iSup_extend_bot
theorem iInf_extend_top {e : ι → β} (he : Injective e) (f : ι → α) :
⨅ j, extend e f ⊤ j = iInf f :=
@iSup_extend_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ he _
#align infi_extend_top iInf_extend_top
/-!
### `iSup` and `iInf` under `Type`
-/
theorem iSup_of_empty' {α ι} [SupSet α] [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iSup f = sSup (∅ : Set α) :=
congr_arg sSup (range_eq_empty f)
#align supr_of_empty' iSup_of_empty'
theorem iInf_of_isEmpty {α ι} [InfSet α] [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iInf f = sInf (∅ : Set α) :=
congr_arg sInf (range_eq_empty f)
#align infi_of_empty' iInf_of_isEmpty
theorem iSup_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iSup f = ⊥ :=
(iSup_of_empty' f).trans sSup_empty
#align supr_of_empty iSup_of_empty
theorem iInf_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iInf f = ⊤ :=
@iSup_of_empty αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f
#align infi_of_empty iInf_of_empty
theorem iSup_bool_eq {f : Bool → α} : ⨆ b : Bool, f b = f true ⊔ f false := by
rw [iSup, Bool.range_eq, sSup_pair, sup_comm]
#align supr_bool_eq iSup_bool_eq
theorem iInf_bool_eq {f : Bool → α} : ⨅ b : Bool, f b = f true ⊓ f false :=
@iSup_bool_eq αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_bool_eq iInf_bool_eq
theorem sup_eq_iSup (x y : α) : x ⊔ y = ⨆ b : Bool, cond b x y := by
rw [iSup_bool_eq, Bool.cond_true, Bool.cond_false]
#align sup_eq_supr sup_eq_iSup
theorem inf_eq_iInf (x y : α) : x ⊓ y = ⨅ b : Bool, cond b x y :=
@sup_eq_iSup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align inf_eq_infi inf_eq_iInf
theorem isGLB_biInf {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : IsGLB (f '' s) (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) := by
simpa only [range_comp, Subtype.range_coe, iInf_subtype'] using
@isGLB_iInf α s _ (f ∘ fun x => (x : β))
#align is_glb_binfi isGLB_biInf
theorem isLUB_biSup {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : IsLUB (f '' s) (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) := by
simpa only [range_comp, Subtype.range_coe, iSup_subtype'] using
@isLUB_iSup α s _ (f ∘ fun x => (x : β))
#align is_lub_bsupr isLUB_biSup
theorem iSup_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : Sigma p → α} : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ (i) (j), f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [iSup_le_iff, Sigma.forall]
#align supr_sigma iSup_sigma
theorem iInf_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : Sigma p → α} : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ (i) (j), f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
@iSup_sigma αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_sigma iInf_sigma
lemma iSup_sigma' {κ : β → Type*} (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
(⨆ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ x : Σ i, κ i, f x.1 x.2 :=
(iSup_sigma (f := fun x ↦ f x.1 x.2)).symm
lemma iInf_sigma' {κ : β → Type*} (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
(⨅ i, ⨅ j, f i j) = ⨅ x : Σ i, κ i, f x.1 x.2 :=
(iInf_sigma (f := fun x ↦ f x.1 x.2)).symm
theorem iSup_prod {f : β × γ → α} : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ (i) (j), f (i, j) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [iSup_le_iff, Prod.forall]
#align supr_prod iSup_prod
theorem iInf_prod {f : β × γ → α} : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ (i) (j), f (i, j) :=
@iSup_prod αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_prod iInf_prod
lemma iSup_prod' (f : β → γ → α) : (⨆ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ x : β × γ, f x.1 x.2 :=
(iSup_prod (f := fun x ↦ f x.1 x.2)).symm
lemma iInf_prod' (f : β → γ → α) : (⨅ i, ⨅ j, f i j) = ⨅ x : β × γ, f x.1 x.2 :=
(iInf_prod (f := fun x ↦ f x.1 x.2)).symm
theorem biSup_prod {f : β × γ → α} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} :
⨆ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ⨆ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f (a, b) := by
simp_rw [iSup_prod, mem_prod, iSup_and]
exact iSup_congr fun _ => iSup_comm
#align bsupr_prod biSup_prod
theorem biInf_prod {f : β × γ → α} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} :
⨅ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ⨅ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f (a, b) :=
@biSup_prod αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align binfi_prod biInf_prod
theorem iSup_sum {f : Sum β γ → α} : ⨆ x, f x = (⨆ i, f (Sum.inl i)) ⊔ ⨆ j, f (Sum.inr j) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff, Sum.forall]
#align supr_sum iSup_sum
theorem iInf_sum {f : Sum β γ → α} : ⨅ x, f x = (⨅ i, f (Sum.inl i)) ⊓ ⨅ j, f (Sum.inr j) :=
@iSup_sum αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_sum iInf_sum
theorem iSup_option (f : Option β → α) : ⨆ o, f o = f none ⊔ ⨆ b, f (Option.some b) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [iSup_le_iff, sup_le_iff, Option.forall]
#align supr_option iSup_option
theorem iInf_option (f : Option β → α) : ⨅ o, f o = f none ⊓ ⨅ b, f (Option.some b) :=
@iSup_option αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align infi_option iInf_option
/-- A version of `iSup_option` useful for rewriting right-to-left. -/
theorem iSup_option_elim (a : α) (f : β → α) : ⨆ o : Option β, o.elim a f = a ⊔ ⨆ b, f b := by
simp [iSup_option]
#align supr_option_elim iSup_option_elim
/-- A version of `iInf_option` useful for rewriting right-to-left. -/
theorem iInf_option_elim (a : α) (f : β → α) : ⨅ o : Option β, o.elim a f = a ⊓ ⨅ b, f b :=
@iSup_option_elim αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_option_elim iInf_option_elim
/-- When taking the supremum of `f : ι → α`, the elements of `ι` on which `f` gives `⊥` can be
dropped, without changing the result. -/
@[simp]
theorem iSup_ne_bot_subtype (f : ι → α) : ⨆ i : { i // f i ≠ ⊥ }, f i = ⨆ i, f i := by
by_cases htriv : ∀ i, f i = ⊥
· simp only [iSup_bot, (funext htriv : f = _)]
refine (iSup_comp_le f _).antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_)
by_cases hi : f i = ⊥
· rw [hi]
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ := not_forall.mp htriv
exact ⟨⟨i₀, hi₀⟩, bot_le⟩
· exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, rfl.le⟩
#align supr_ne_bot_subtype iSup_ne_bot_subtype
/-- When taking the infimum of `f : ι → α`, the elements of `ι` on which `f` gives `⊤` can be
dropped, without changing the result. -/
theorem iInf_ne_top_subtype (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i : { i // f i ≠ ⊤ }, f i = ⨅ i, f i :=
@iSup_ne_bot_subtype αᵒᵈ ι _ f
#align infi_ne_top_subtype iInf_ne_top_subtype
theorem sSup_image2 {f : β → γ → α} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} :
sSup (image2 f s t) = ⨆ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := by rw [← image_prod, sSup_image, biSup_prod]
#align Sup_image2 sSup_image2
theorem sInf_image2 {f : β → γ → α} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} :
sInf (image2 f s t) = ⨅ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := by rw [← image_prod, sInf_image, biInf_prod]
#align Inf_image2 sInf_image2
/-!
### `iSup` and `iInf` under `ℕ`
-/
theorem iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ i ≥ n, u i = ⨆ i, u (i + n) := by
apply le_antisymm <;> simp only [iSup_le_iff]
· refine fun i hi => le_sSup ⟨i - n, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel hi]
· exact fun i => le_sSup ⟨i + n, iSup_pos (Nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩
#align supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add
theorem iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨅ i ≥ n, u i = ⨅ i, u (i + n) :=
@iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align infi_ge_eq_infi_nat_add iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add
theorem Monotone.iSup_nat_add {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) : ⨆ n, f (n + k) = ⨆ n, f n :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun i => le_iSup _ (i + k)) <| iSup_mono fun i => hf <| Nat.le_add_right i k
#align monotone.supr_nat_add Monotone.iSup_nat_add
theorem Antitone.iInf_nat_add {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) : ⨅ n, f (n + k) = ⨅ n, f n :=
hf.dual_right.iSup_nat_add k
#align antitone.infi_nat_add Antitone.iInf_nat_add
-- Porting note: the linter doesn't like this being marked as `@[simp]`,
-- saying that it doesn't work when called on its LHS.
-- Mysteriously, it *does* work. Nevertheless, per
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/complete_lattice.20and.20has_sup/near/316497982
-- "the subterm ?f (i + ?k) produces an ugly higher-order unification problem."
-- @[simp]
theorem iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i := by
have hf : Monotone fun n => ⨅ i ≥ n, f i := fun n m h => biInf_mono fun i => h.trans
rw [← Monotone.iSup_nat_add hf k]
· simp_rw [iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add, ← Nat.add_assoc]
#align supr_infi_ge_nat_add iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add
-- Porting note: removing `@[simp]`, see discussion on `iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add`.
-- @[simp]
theorem iInf_iSup_ge_nat_add :
∀ (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ), ⨅ n, ⨆ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⨅ n, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i :=
@iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add αᵒᵈ _
#align infi_supr_ge_nat_add iInf_iSup_ge_nat_add
theorem sup_iSup_nat_succ (u : ℕ → α) : (u 0 ⊔ ⨆ i, u (i + 1)) = ⨆ i, u i :=
calc
(u 0 ⊔ ⨆ i, u (i + 1)) = ⨆ x ∈ {0} ∪ range Nat.succ, u x := by
{ rw [iSup_union, iSup_singleton, iSup_range] }
_ = ⨆ i, u i := by rw [Nat.zero_union_range_succ, iSup_univ]
#align sup_supr_nat_succ sup_iSup_nat_succ
theorem inf_iInf_nat_succ (u : ℕ → α) : (u 0 ⊓ ⨅ i, u (i + 1)) = ⨅ i, u i :=
@sup_iSup_nat_succ αᵒᵈ _ u
#align inf_infi_nat_succ inf_iInf_nat_succ
theorem iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq (f : ℕ → α) : ⨅ i > 0, f i = ⨅ i, f (i + 1) := by
rw [← iInf_range, Nat.range_succ]
simp
#align infi_nat_gt_zero_eq iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq
theorem iSup_nat_gt_zero_eq (f : ℕ → α) : ⨆ i > 0, f i = ⨆ i, f (i + 1) :=
@iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq αᵒᵈ _ f
#align supr_nat_gt_zero_eq iSup_nat_gt_zero_eq
end
section CompleteLinearOrder
variable [CompleteLinearOrder α]
theorem iSup_eq_top (f : ι → α) : iSup f = ⊤ ↔ ∀ b < ⊤, ∃ i, b < f i := by
simp only [← sSup_range, sSup_eq_top, Set.exists_range_iff]
#align supr_eq_top iSup_eq_top
theorem iInf_eq_bot (f : ι → α) : iInf f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b > ⊥, ∃ i, f i < b := by
simp only [← sInf_range, sInf_eq_bot, Set.exists_range_iff]
#align infi_eq_bot iInf_eq_bot
end CompleteLinearOrder
/-!
### Instances
-/
instance Prop.instCompleteLattice : CompleteLattice Prop where
__ := Prop.instBoundedOrder
__ := Prop.instDistribLattice
sSup s := ∃ a ∈ s, a
le_sSup _ a h p := ⟨a, h, p⟩
sSup_le _ _ h := fun ⟨b, h', p⟩ => h b h' p
sInf s := ∀ a, a ∈ s → a
sInf_le _ a h p := p a h
le_sInf _ _ h p b hb := h b hb p
#align Prop.complete_lattice Prop.instCompleteLattice
noncomputable instance Prop.instCompleteLinearOrder : CompleteLinearOrder Prop where
__ := Prop.instCompleteLattice
__ := Prop.linearOrder
#align Prop.complete_linear_order Prop.instCompleteLinearOrder
@[simp]
theorem sSup_Prop_eq {s : Set Prop} : sSup s = ∃ p ∈ s, p :=
rfl
#align Sup_Prop_eq sSup_Prop_eq
@[simp]
theorem sInf_Prop_eq {s : Set Prop} : sInf s = ∀ p ∈ s, p :=
rfl
#align Inf_Prop_eq sInf_Prop_eq
@[simp]
theorem iSup_Prop_eq {p : ι → Prop} : ⨆ i, p i = ∃ i, p i :=
le_antisymm (fun ⟨_, ⟨i, (eq : p i = _)⟩, hq⟩ => ⟨i, eq.symm ▸ hq⟩) fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨p i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩
#align supr_Prop_eq iSup_Prop_eq
@[simp]
theorem iInf_Prop_eq {p : ι → Prop} : ⨅ i, p i = ∀ i, p i :=
le_antisymm (fun h i => h _ ⟨i, rfl⟩) fun h _ ⟨i, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ h i
#align infi_Prop_eq iInf_Prop_eq
instance Pi.supSet {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, SupSet (β i)] : SupSet (∀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun s i => ⨆ f : s, (f : ∀ i, β i) i⟩
#align pi.has_Sup Pi.supSet
instance Pi.infSet {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, InfSet (β i)] : InfSet (∀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun s i => ⨅ f : s, (f : ∀ i, β i) i⟩
#align pi.has_Inf Pi.infSet
instance Pi.instCompleteLattice {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, CompleteLattice (β i)] :
CompleteLattice (∀ i, β i) where
__ := instBoundedOrder
le_sSup s f hf := fun i => le_iSup (fun f : s => (f : ∀ i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩
sInf_le s f hf := fun i => iInf_le (fun f : s => (f : ∀ i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩
sSup_le _ _ hf := fun i => iSup_le fun g => hf g g.2 i
le_sInf _ _ hf := fun i => le_iInf fun g => hf g g.2 i
#align pi.complete_lattice Pi.instCompleteLattice
theorem sSup_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, SupSet (β i)] {s : Set (∀ a, β a)} {a : α} :
(sSup s) a = ⨆ f : s, (f : ∀ a, β a) a :=
rfl
#align Sup_apply sSup_apply
theorem sInf_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, InfSet (β i)] {s : Set (∀ a, β a)} {a : α} :
sInf s a = ⨅ f : s, (f : ∀ a, β a) a :=
rfl
#align Inf_apply sInf_apply
@[simp]
theorem iSup_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [∀ i, SupSet (β i)] {f : ι → ∀ a, β a}
{a : α} : (⨆ i, f i) a = ⨆ i, f i a := by
rw [iSup, sSup_apply, iSup, iSup, ← image_eq_range (fun f : ∀ i, β i => f a) (range f), ←
range_comp]; rfl
#align supr_apply iSup_apply
@[simp]
theorem iInf_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [∀ i, InfSet (β i)] {f : ι → ∀ a, β a}
{a : α} : (⨅ i, f i) a = ⨅ i, f i a :=
@iSup_apply α (fun i => (β i)ᵒᵈ) _ _ _ _
#align infi_apply iInf_apply
theorem unary_relation_sSup_iff {α : Type*} (s : Set (α → Prop)) {a : α} :
sSup s a ↔ ∃ r : α → Prop, r ∈ s ∧ r a := by
rw [sSup_apply]
simp [← eq_iff_iff]
#align unary_relation_Sup_iff unary_relation_sSup_iff
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteLattice.lean | 1,770 | 1,773 | theorem unary_relation_sInf_iff {α : Type*} (s : Set (α → Prop)) {a : α} :
sInf s a ↔ ∀ r : α → Prop, r ∈ s → r a := by |
rw [sInf_apply]
simp [← eq_iff_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.RBMap.Alter
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
/-!
# Additional lemmas for Red-black trees
-/
namespace Batteries
namespace RBNode
open RBColor
attribute [simp] fold foldl foldr Any forM foldlM Ordered
@[simp] theorem min?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.min? = t.max? := by
unfold RBNode.max?; split <;> simp [RBNode.min?]
unfold RBNode.min?; rw [min?.match_1.eq_3]
· apply min?_reverse
· simpa [reverse_eq_iff]
@[simp] theorem max?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.max? = t.min? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_nil {x} : ¬x ∈ (.nil : RBNode α) := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
@[simp] theorem mem_node {y c a x b} :
y ∈ (.node c a x b : RBNode α) ↔ y = x ∨ y ∈ a ∨ y ∈ b := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
theorem All_def {t : RBNode α} : t.All p ↔ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_imp, forall_and, *]
theorem Any_def {t : RBNode α} : t.Any p ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_and_right, exists_or, *]
theorem memP_def : MemP cut t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_def : Mem cmp x t ↔ ∃ y ∈ t, cmp x y = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_congr [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} (h : cmp x y = .eq) :
Mem cmp x t ↔ Mem cmp y t := by simp [Mem, TransCmp.cmp_congr_left' h]
theorem isOrdered_iff' [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t L R ↔
(∀ a ∈ L, t.All (cmpLT cmp a ·)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ R, t.All (cmpLT cmp · a)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ L, ∀ b ∈ R, cmpLT cmp a b) ∧
Ordered cmp t := by
induction t generalizing L R with
| nil =>
simp [isOrdered]; split <;> simp [cmpLT_iff]
next h => intro _ ha _ hb; cases h _ _ ha hb
| node _ l v r =>
simp [isOrdered, *]
exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨Ll, lv, Lv, ol⟩, ⟨vr, rR, vR, or⟩⟩ => ⟨
fun _ h => ⟨Lv _ h, Ll _ h, (Lv _ h).trans_l vr⟩,
fun _ h => ⟨vR _ h, (vR _ h).trans_r lv, rR _ h⟩,
fun _ hL _ hR => (Lv _ hL).trans (vR _ hR),
lv, vr, ol, or⟩,
fun ⟨hL, hR, _, lv, vr, ol, or⟩ => ⟨
⟨fun _ h => (hL _ h).2.1, lv, fun _ h => (hL _ h).1, ol⟩,
⟨vr, fun _ h => (hR _ h).2.2, fun _ h => (hR _ h).1, or⟩⟩⟩
theorem isOrdered_iff [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t ↔ Ordered cmp t := by simp [isOrdered_iff']
instance (cmp) [@TransCmp α cmp] (t) : Decidable (Ordered cmp t) := decidable_of_iff _ isOrdered_iff
/--
A cut is like a homomorphism of orderings: it is a monotonic predicate with respect to `cmp`,
but it can make things that are distinguished by `cmp` equal.
This is sufficient for `find?` to locate an element on which `cut` returns `.eq`,
but there may be other elements, not returned by `find?`, on which `cut` also returns `.eq`.
-/
class IsCut (cmp : α → α → Ordering) (cut : α → Ordering) : Prop where
/-- The set `{x | cut x = .lt}` is downward-closed. -/
le_lt_trans [TransCmp cmp] : cmp x y ≠ .gt → cut x = .lt → cut y = .lt
/-- The set `{x | cut x = .gt}` is upward-closed. -/
le_gt_trans [TransCmp cmp] : cmp x y ≠ .gt → cut y = .gt → cut x = .gt
theorem IsCut.lt_trans [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp]
(H : cmp x y = .lt) : cut x = .lt → cut y = .lt :=
IsCut.le_lt_trans <| TransCmp.gt_asymm <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 H
theorem IsCut.gt_trans [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp]
(H : cmp x y = .lt) : cut y = .gt → cut x = .gt :=
IsCut.le_gt_trans <| TransCmp.gt_asymm <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 H
theorem IsCut.congr [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp] (H : cmp x y = .eq) : cut x = cut y := by
cases ey : cut y
· exact IsCut.le_lt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h) ey
· cases ex : cut x
· exact IsCut.le_lt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans h) ex |>.symm.trans ey
· rfl
· refine IsCut.le_gt_trans (cmp := cmp) (fun h => ?_) ex |>.symm.trans ey
cases H.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h
· exact IsCut.le_gt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans h) ey
instance (cmp cut) [@IsCut α cmp cut] : IsCut (flip cmp) (cut · |>.swap) where
le_lt_trans h₁ h₂ := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [IsCut.le_gt_trans (cmp := cmp) h₁ (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h₂)]; rfl
le_gt_trans h₁ h₂ := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [IsCut.le_lt_trans (cmp := cmp) h₁ (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h₂)]; rfl
/--
`IsStrictCut` upgrades the `IsCut` property to ensure that at most one element of the tree
can match the cut, and hence `find?` will return the unique such element if one exists.
-/
class IsStrictCut (cmp : α → α → Ordering) (cut : α → Ordering) extends IsCut cmp cut : Prop where
/-- If `cut = x`, then `cut` and `x` have compare the same with respect to other elements. -/
exact [TransCmp cmp] : cut x = .eq → cmp x y = cut y
/-- A "representable cut" is one generated by `cmp a` for some `a`. This is always a valid cut. -/
instance (cmp) (a : α) : IsStrictCut cmp (cmp a) where
le_lt_trans h₁ h₂ := TransCmp.lt_le_trans h₂ h₁
le_gt_trans h₁ := Decidable.not_imp_not.1 (TransCmp.le_trans · h₁)
exact h := (TransCmp.cmp_congr_left h).symm
instance (cmp cut) [@IsStrictCut α cmp cut] : IsStrictCut (flip cmp) (cut · |>.swap) where
exact h := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [← IsStrictCut.exact (cmp := cmp) (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h), OrientedCmp.symm]; rfl
section fold
theorem foldr_cons (t : RBNode α) (l) : t.foldr (·::·) l = t.toList ++ l := by
unfold toList
induction t generalizing l with
| nil => rfl
| node _ a _ b iha ihb => rw [foldr, foldr, iha, iha (_::_), ihb]; simp
@[simp] theorem toList_nil : (.nil : RBNode α).toList = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_node : (.node c a x b : RBNode α).toList = a.toList ++ x :: b.toList := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons]; rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.toList = t.toList.reverse := by
induction t <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem mem_toList {t : RBNode α} : x ∈ t.toList ↔ x ∈ t := by
induction t <;> simp [*, or_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {t : RBNode α} : a ∈ t.reverse ↔ a ∈ t := by rw [← mem_toList]; simp
theorem min?_eq_toList_head? {t : RBNode α} : t.min? = t.toList.head? := by
induction t with
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ _ ih =>
cases l <;> simp [RBNode.min?, ih]
next ll _ _ => cases toList ll <;> rfl
theorem max?_eq_toList_getLast? {t : RBNode α} : t.max? = t.toList.getLast? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, min?_eq_toList_head?]; simp
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.foldr f init = t.toList.foldr f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem foldl_reverse {α β : Type _} {t : RBNode α} {f : β → α → β} {init : β} :
t.reverse.foldl f init = t.foldr (flip f) init := by
simp (config := {unfoldPartialApp := true})
[foldr_eq_foldr_toList, foldl_eq_foldl_toList, flip]
theorem foldr_reverse {α β : Type _} {t : RBNode α} {f : α → β → β} {init : β} :
t.reverse.foldr f init = t.foldl (flip f) init :=
foldl_reverse.symm.trans (by simp; rfl)
theorem forM_eq_forM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
t.forM (m := m) f = t.toList.forM f := by induction t <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
t.foldlM (m := m) f init = t.toList.foldlM f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem forIn_visit_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn.visit (m := m) f t init = (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f t.toList := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*, forIn.visit]
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := by
conv => lhs; simp only [forIn, RBNode.forIn]
rw [List.forIn_eq_bindList, forIn_visit_eq_bindList]
end fold
namespace Stream
attribute [simp] foldl foldr
theorem foldr_cons (t : RBNode.Stream α) (l) : t.foldr (·::·) l = t.toList ++ l := by
unfold toList; apply Eq.symm; induction t <;> simp [*, foldr, RBNode.foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem toList_nil : (.nil : RBNode.Stream α).toList = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_cons :
(.cons x r s : RBNode.Stream α).toList = x :: r.toList ++ s.toList := by
rw [toList, toList, foldr, RBNode.foldr_cons]; rfl
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {s : RBNode.Stream α} : s.foldr f init = s.toList.foldr f init := by
induction s <;> simp [*, RBNode.foldr_eq_foldr_toList]
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBNode.Stream α} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*, RBNode.foldl_eq_foldl_toList]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/RBMap/Lemmas.lean | 212 | 215 | theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := by |
conv => lhs; simp only [forIn, RBNode.forIn]
rw [List.forIn_eq_bindList, forIn_visit_eq_bindList]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Complex
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DivergenceTheorem
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.CircleIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Dslope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.ReImTopology
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.DiffContOnCl
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
#align_import analysis.complex.cauchy_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Cauchy integral formula
In this file we prove the Cauchy-Goursat theorem and the Cauchy integral formula for integrals over
circles. Most results are formulated for a function `f : ℂ → E` that takes values in a complex
Banach space with second countable topology.
## Main statements
In the following theorems, if the name ends with `off_countable`, then the actual theorem assumes
differentiability at all but countably many points of the set mentioned below.
* `Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable`: If a function
`f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle and *real* differentiable on its interior, then
its integral over the boundary of this rectangle is equal to the integral of
`I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I` over the rectangle, where `f' z w : E` is the derivative
of `f` at `z` in the direction `w` and `I = Complex.I` is the imaginary unit.
* `Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`: If a function
`f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle and is *complex* differentiable on its interior,
then its integral over the boundary of this rectangle is equal to zero.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable`: If a
function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed annulus `{z | r ≤ |z - c| ≤ R}` and is complex
differentiable on its interior `{z | r < |z - c| < R}`, then the integrals of `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z`
over the outer boundary and over the inner boundary are equal.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto`,
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`:
If a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a punctured closed disc `{z | |z - c| ≤ R ∧ z ≠ c}`, is
complex differentiable on the corresponding punctured open disc, and tends to `y` as `z → c`,
`z ≠ c`, then the integral of `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` over the circle `|z - c| = R` is equal to
`2πiy`. In particular, if `f` is continuous on the whole closed disc and is complex differentiable
on the corresponding open disc, then this integral is equal to `2πif(c)`.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`,
`Complex.two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`
**Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disc of radius `R` and is
complex differentiable on the corresponding open disc, then for any `w` in the corresponding open
disc the integral of `(z - w)⁻¹ • f z` over the boundary of the disc is equal to `2πif(w)`.
Two versions of the lemma put the multiplier `2πi` at the different sides of the equality.
* `Complex.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_of_differentiable_off_countable`: If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous
on a closed disc of positive radius and is complex differentiable on the corresponding open disc,
then it is analytic on the corresponding open disc, and the coefficients of the power series are
given by Cauchy integral formulas.
* `DifferentiableOn.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`: If `f : ℂ → E` is complex differentiable on a
closed disc of positive radius, then it is analytic on the corresponding open disc, and the
coefficients of the power series are given by Cauchy integral formulas.
* `DifferentiableOn.analyticAt`, `Differentiable.analyticAt`: If `f : ℂ → E` is differentiable
on a neighborhood of a point, then it is analytic at this point. In particular, if `f : ℂ → E`
is differentiable on the whole `ℂ`, then it is analytic at every point `z : ℂ`.
* `Differentiable.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`: If `f : ℂ → E` is differentiable everywhere then the
`cauchyPowerSeries f z R` is a formal power series representing `f` at `z` with infinite
radius of convergence (this holds for any choice of `0 < R`).
## Implementation details
The proof of the Cauchy integral formula in this file is based on a very general version of the
divergence theorem, see `MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable`
(a version for functions defined on `Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`),
`MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_prod_Icc_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable_of_le`, and
`MeasureTheory.integral2_divergence_prod_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable` (versions for
functions defined on `ℝ × ℝ`).
Usually, the divergence theorem is formulated for a $C^1$ smooth function. The theorems formulated
above deal with a function that is
* continuous on a closed box/rectangle;
* differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior;
* have divergence integrable over the closed box/rectangle.
First, we reformulate the theorem for a *real*-differentiable map `ℂ → E`, and relate the integral
of `f` over the boundary of a rectangle in `ℂ` to the integral of the derivative
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ over the interior of this box. In particular, for a *complex*
differentiable function, the latter derivative is zero, hence the integral over the boundary of a
rectangle is zero. Thus we get the Cauchy-Goursat theorem for a rectangle in `ℂ`.
Next, we apply this theorem to the function $F(z)=f(c+e^{z})$ on the rectangle
$[\ln r, \ln R]\times [0, 2\pi]$ to prove that
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=r}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}=\oint_{|z-c|=R}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}
$$
provided that `f` is continuous on the closed annulus `r ≤ |z - c| ≤ R` and is complex
differentiable on its interior `r < |z - c| < R` (possibly, at all but countably many points).
Here and below, we write $\frac{f(z)}{z-c}$ in the documentation while the actual lemmas use
`(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` because `f z` belongs to some Banach space over `ℂ` and `f z / (z - c)` is
undefined.
Taking the limit of this equality as `r` tends to `𝓝[>] 0`, we prove
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}=2\pi if(c)
$$
provided that `f` is continuous on the closed disc `|z - c| ≤ R` and is differentiable at all but
countably many points of its interior. This is the Cauchy integral formula for the center of a
circle. In particular, if we apply this function to `F z = (z - c) • f z`, then we get
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R} f(z)\,dz=0.
$$
In order to deduce the Cauchy integral formula for any point `w`, `|w - c| < R`, we consider the
slope function `g : ℂ → E` given by `g z = (z - w)⁻¹ • (f z - f w)` if `z ≠ w` and `g w = f' w`.
This function satisfies assumptions of the previous theorem, so we have
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-w}=\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(w)\,dz}{z-w}=
\left(\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{dz}{z-w}\right)f(w).
$$
The latter integral was computed in `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball` and is equal to
`2 * π * Complex.I`.
There is one more step in the actual proof. Since we allow `f` to be non-differentiable on a
countable set `s`, we cannot immediately claim that `g` is continuous at `w` if `w ∈ s`. So, we use
the proof outlined in the previous paragraph for `w ∉ s` (see
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux`), then use continuity
of both sides of the formula and density of `sᶜ` to prove the formula for all points of the open
ball, see `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`.
Finally, we use the properties of the Cauchy integrals established elsewhere (see
`hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`) and Cauchy integral formula to prove that the original
function is analytic on the open ball.
## Tags
Cauchy-Goursat theorem, Cauchy integral formula
-/
open TopologicalSpace Set MeasureTheory intervalIntegral Metric Filter Function
open scoped Interval Real NNReal ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
universe u
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]
namespace Complex
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle with opposite corners at
`z w : ℂ`, is *real* differentiable at all but countably many points of the corresponding open
rectangle, and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then the
integral of `f` over the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable)
(Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I := by
set e : (ℝ × ℝ) ≃L[ℝ] ℂ := equivRealProdCLM.symm
have he : ∀ x y : ℝ, ↑x + ↑y * I = e (x, y) := fun x y => (mk_eq_add_mul_I x y).symm
have he₁ : e (1, 0) = 1 := rfl; have he₂ : e (0, 1) = I := rfl
simp only [he] at *
set F : ℝ × ℝ → E := f ∘ e
set F' : ℝ × ℝ → ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] E := fun p => (f' (e p)).comp (e : ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ)
have hF' : ∀ p : ℝ × ℝ, (-(I • F' p)) (1, 0) + F' p (0, 1) = -(I • f' (e p) 1 - f' (e p) I) := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [F', ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, he₁, he₂, neg_add_eq_sub,
neg_sub]
set R : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := [[z.re, w.re]] ×ˢ [[w.im, z.im]]
set t : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := e ⁻¹' s
rw [uIcc_comm z.im] at Hc Hi; rw [min_comm z.im, max_comm z.im] at Hd
have hR : e ⁻¹' ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[w.im, z.im]]) = R := rfl
have htc : ContinuousOn F R := Hc.comp e.continuousOn hR.ge
have htd :
∀ p ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ˢ Ioo (min w.im z.im) (max w.im z.im) \ t,
HasFDerivAt F (F' p) p :=
fun p hp => (Hd (e p) hp).comp p e.hasFDerivAt
simp_rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_smul, intervalIntegral.integral_symm w.im z.im, ←
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, ← hF']
refine (integral2_divergence_prod_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable (fun p => -(I • F p)) F
(fun p => -(I • F' p)) F' z.re w.im w.re z.im t (hs.preimage e.injective)
(htc.const_smul _).neg htc (fun p hp => ((htd p hp).const_smul I).neg) htd ?_).symm
rw [← (volume_preserving_equiv_real_prod.symm _).integrableOn_comp_preimage
(MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)] at Hi
simpa only [hF'] using Hi.neg
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_has_fderiv_at_real_off_countable Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle with opposite corners at
`z w : ℂ`, is *real* differentiable on the corresponding open rectangle, and
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then the integral of `f` over
the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_continuousOn_of_hasFDerivAt_real (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im),
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f f' z w ∅ countable_empty Hc
(fun x hx => Hd x hx.1) Hi
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_continuous_on_of_has_fderiv_at_real Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_continuousOn_of_hasFDerivAt_real
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is *real* differentiable on a closed rectangle with opposite
corners at `z w : ℂ` and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then
the integral of `f` over the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiableOn_real (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(Hd : DifferentiableOn ℝ f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • fderiv ℝ f z 1 - fderiv ℝ f z I)
([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im,
I • fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) 1 - fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f (fderiv ℝ f) z w ∅ countable_empty
Hd.continuousOn
(fun x hx => Hd.hasFDerivAt <| by
simpa only [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_reProdIm, uIcc, interior_Icc] using hx.1)
Hi
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiable_on_real Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiableOn_real
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for a rectangle: the integral of a complex differentiable function
over the boundary of a rectangle equals zero. More precisely, if `f` is continuous on a closed
rectangle and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of the corresponding open
rectangle, then its integral over the boundary of the rectangle equals zero. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/CauchyIntegral.lean | 250 | 260 | theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 := by |
refine (integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f
(fun z => (fderiv ℂ f z).restrictScalars ℝ) z w s hs Hc
(fun x hx => (Hd x hx).hasFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ) ?_).trans ?_ <;>
simp [← ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Equiv
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.FundamentalGroupoid.Product
#align_import algebraic_topology.fundamental_groupoid.induced_maps from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e5470580a62bf043e10976760edfe73c913eb71e"
/-!
# Homotopic maps induce naturally isomorphic functors
## Main definitions
- `FundamentalGroupoidFunctor.homotopicMapsNatIso H` The natural isomorphism
between the induced functors `f : π(X) ⥤ π(Y)` and `g : π(X) ⥤ π(Y)`, given a homotopy
`H : f ∼ g`
- `FundamentalGroupoidFunctor.equivOfHomotopyEquiv hequiv` The equivalence of the categories
`π(X)` and `π(Y)` given a homotopy equivalence `hequiv : X ≃ₕ Y` between them.
## Implementation notes
- In order to be more universe polymorphic, we define `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.uliftMap`
which lifts a homotopy from `I × X → Y` to `(TopCat.of ((ULift I) × X)) → Y`. This is because
this construction uses `FundamentalGroupoidFunctor.prodToProdTop` to convert between
pairs of paths in I and X and the corresponding path after passing through a homotopy `H`.
But `FundamentalGroupoidFunctor.prodToProdTop` requires two spaces in the same universe.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open FundamentalGroupoid
open CategoryTheory
open FundamentalGroupoidFunctor
open scoped FundamentalGroupoid
open scoped unitInterval
namespace unitInterval
/-- The path 0 ⟶ 1 in `I` -/
def path01 : Path (0 : I) 1 where
toFun := id
source' := rfl
target' := rfl
#align unit_interval.path01 unitInterval.path01
/-- The path 0 ⟶ 1 in `ULift I` -/
def upath01 : Path (ULift.up 0 : ULift.{u} I) (ULift.up 1) where
toFun := ULift.up
source' := rfl
target' := rfl
#align unit_interval.upath01 unitInterval.upath01
attribute [local instance] Path.Homotopic.setoid
/-- The homotopy path class of 0 → 1 in `ULift I` -/
def uhpath01 : @fromTop (TopCat.of <| ULift.{u} I) (ULift.up (0 : I)) ⟶ fromTop (ULift.up 1) :=
⟦upath01⟧
#align unit_interval.uhpath01 unitInterval.uhpath01
end unitInterval
namespace ContinuousMap.Homotopy
open unitInterval (uhpath01)
attribute [local instance] Path.Homotopic.setoid
section Casts
/-- Abbreviation for `eqToHom` that accepts points in a topological space -/
abbrev hcast {X : TopCat} {x₀ x₁ : X} (hx : x₀ = x₁) : fromTop x₀ ⟶ fromTop x₁ :=
eqToHom <| FundamentalGroupoid.ext _ _ hx
#align continuous_map.homotopy.hcast ContinuousMap.Homotopy.hcast
@[simp]
theorem hcast_def {X : TopCat} {x₀ x₁ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ = x₁) :
hcast hx₀ = eqToHom (FundamentalGroupoid.ext _ _ hx₀) :=
rfl
#align continuous_map.homotopy.hcast_def ContinuousMap.Homotopy.hcast_def
variable {X₁ X₂ Y : TopCat.{u}} {f : C(X₁, Y)} {g : C(X₂, Y)} {x₀ x₁ : X₁} {x₂ x₃ : X₂}
{p : Path x₀ x₁} {q : Path x₂ x₃} (hfg : ∀ t, f (p t) = g (q t))
/-- If `f(p(t) = g(q(t))` for two paths `p` and `q`, then the induced path homotopy classes
`f(p)` and `g(p)` are the same as well, despite having a priori different types -/
theorem heq_path_of_eq_image : HEq ((πₘ f).map ⟦p⟧) ((πₘ g).map ⟦q⟧) := by
simp only [map_eq, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]; apply Path.Homotopic.hpath_hext; exact hfg
#align continuous_map.homotopy.heq_path_of_eq_image ContinuousMap.Homotopy.heq_path_of_eq_image
private theorem start_path : f x₀ = g x₂ := by convert hfg 0 <;> simp only [Path.source]
private theorem end_path : f x₁ = g x₃ := by convert hfg 1 <;> simp only [Path.target]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/FundamentalGroupoid/InducedMaps.lean | 104 | 110 | theorem eq_path_of_eq_image :
(πₘ f).map ⟦p⟧ = hcast (start_path hfg) ≫ (πₘ g).map ⟦q⟧ ≫ hcast (end_path hfg).symm := by |
rw [Functor.conj_eqToHom_iff_heq
((πₘ f).map ⟦p⟧) ((πₘ g).map ⟦q⟧)
(FundamentalGroupoid.ext _ _ <| start_path hfg)
(FundamentalGroupoid.ext _ _ <| end_path hfg)]
exact heq_path_of_eq_image hfg
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.UniversalEnveloping
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
#align_import algebra.lie.free from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"841ac1a3d9162bf51c6327812ecb6e5e71883ac4"
/-!
# Free Lie algebras
Given a commutative ring `R` and a type `X` we construct the free Lie algebra on `X` with
coefficients in `R` together with its universal property.
## Main definitions
* `FreeLieAlgebra`
* `FreeLieAlgebra.lift`
* `FreeLieAlgebra.of`
* `FreeLieAlgebra.universalEnvelopingEquivFreeAlgebra`
## Implementation details
### Quotient of free non-unital, non-associative algebra
We follow [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 1--3*](bourbaki1975) and construct
the free Lie algebra as a quotient of the free non-unital, non-associative algebra. Since we do not
currently have definitions of ideals, lattices of ideals, and quotients for
`NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`, we construct our quotient using the low-level `Quot` function on
an inductively-defined relation.
### Alternative construction (needs PBW)
An alternative construction of the free Lie algebra on `X` is to start with the free unital
associative algebra on `X`, regard it as a Lie algebra via the ring commutator, and take its
smallest Lie subalgebra containing `X`. I.e.:
`LieSubalgebra.lieSpan R (FreeAlgebra R X) (Set.range (FreeAlgebra.ι R))`.
However with this definition there does not seem to be an easy proof that the required universal
property holds, and I don't know of a proof that avoids invoking the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem.
A related MathOverflow question is [this one](https://mathoverflow.net/questions/396680/).
## Tags
lie algebra, free algebra, non-unital, non-associative, universal property, forgetful functor,
adjoint functor
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
variable (R : Type u) (X : Type v) [CommRing R]
/- We save characters by using Bourbaki's name `lib` (as in «libre») for
`FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra` in this file. -/
local notation "lib" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
local notation "lib.lift" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.lift
local notation "lib.of" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.of
local notation "lib.lift_of_apply" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.lift_of_apply
local notation "lib.lift_comp_of" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.lift_comp_of
namespace FreeLieAlgebra
/-- The quotient of `lib R X` by the equivalence relation generated by this relation will give us
the free Lie algebra. -/
inductive Rel : lib R X → lib R X → Prop
| lie_self (a : lib R X) : Rel (a * a) 0
| leibniz_lie (a b c : lib R X) : Rel (a * (b * c)) (a * b * c + b * (a * c))
| smul (t : R) {a b : lib R X} : Rel a b → Rel (t • a) (t • b)
| add_right {a b : lib R X} (c : lib R X) : Rel a b → Rel (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left (a : lib R X) {b c : lib R X} : Rel b c → Rel (a * b) (a * c)
| mul_right {a b : lib R X} (c : lib R X) : Rel a b → Rel (a * c) (b * c)
#align free_lie_algebra.rel FreeLieAlgebra.Rel
variable {R X}
theorem Rel.addLeft (a : lib R X) {b c : lib R X} (h : Rel R X b c) : Rel R X (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm _ b, add_comm _ c]; exact h.add_right _
#align free_lie_algebra.rel.add_left FreeLieAlgebra.Rel.addLeft
theorem Rel.neg {a b : lib R X} (h : Rel R X a b) : Rel R X (-a) (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_one_smul] using h.smul (-1)
#align free_lie_algebra.rel.neg FreeLieAlgebra.Rel.neg
theorem Rel.subLeft (a : lib R X) {b c : lib R X} (h : Rel R X b c) : Rel R X (a - b) (a - c) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.addLeft a
#align free_lie_algebra.rel.sub_left FreeLieAlgebra.Rel.subLeft
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Free.lean | 99 | 100 | theorem Rel.subRight {a b : lib R X} (c : lib R X) (h : Rel R X a b) : Rel R X (a - c) (b - c) := by |
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add_right (-c)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.PerpBisector
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
#align_import geometry.euclidean.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Euclidean spaces
This file makes some definitions and proves very basic geometrical
results about real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
Results about real inner product spaces that involve the norm and
inner product but not angles generally go in
`Analysis.NormedSpace.InnerProduct`. Results with longer
proofs or more geometrical content generally go in separate files.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection` is the orthogonal
projection of a point onto an affine subspace.
* `EuclideanGeometry.reflection` is the reflection of a point in an
affine subspace.
## Implementation notes
To declare `P` as the type of points in a Euclidean affine space with
`V` as the type of vectors, use
`[NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P]`.
This works better with `outParam` to make
`V` implicit in most cases than having a separate type alias for
Euclidean affine spaces.
Rather than requiring Euclidean affine spaces to be finite-dimensional
(as in the definition on Wikipedia), this is specified only for those
theorems that need it.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some geometrical definitions and results on
Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The midpoint of the segment AB is the same distance from A as it is from B. -/
theorem dist_left_midpoint_eq_dist_right_midpoint (p1 p2 : P) :
dist p1 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) = dist p2 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) := by
rw [dist_left_midpoint (𝕜 := ℝ) p1 p2, dist_right_midpoint (𝕜 := ℝ) p1 p2]
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_left_midpoint_eq_dist_right_midpoint EuclideanGeometry.dist_left_midpoint_eq_dist_right_midpoint
/-- The inner product of two vectors given with `weightedVSub`, in
terms of the pairwise distances. -/
theorem inner_weightedVSub {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ} (p₁ : ι₁ → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ} (p₂ : ι₂ → P)
(h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪s₁.weightedVSub p₁ w₁, s₂.weightedVSub p₂ w₂⟫ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂) * dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂))) /
2 := by
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_apply, Finset.weightedVSub_apply,
inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero _ h₁ _ h₂]
simp_rw [vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
rcongr (i₁ i₂) <;> rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂)]
#align euclidean_geometry.inner_weighted_vsub EuclideanGeometry.inner_weightedVSub
/-- The distance between two points given with `affineCombination`,
in terms of the pairwise distances between the points in that
combination. -/
theorem dist_affineCombination {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {w₁ w₂ : ι → ℝ} (p : ι → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) : by
have a₁ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁
have a₂ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂
exact dist a₁ a₂ * dist a₁ a₂ = (-∑ i₁ ∈ s, ∑ i₂ ∈ s,
(w₁ - w₂) i₁ * (w₁ - w₂) i₂ * (dist (p i₁) (p i₂) * dist (p i₁) (p i₂))) / 2 := by
dsimp only
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁) (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂), ←
@inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, Finset.affineCombination_vsub]
have h : (∑ i ∈ s, (w₁ - w₂) i) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, h₁, h₂, sub_self]
exact inner_weightedVSub p h p h
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_affine_combination EuclideanGeometry.dist_affineCombination
-- Porting note: `inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq` moved to `PerpendicularBisector`
/-- The squared distance between points on a line (expressed as a
multiple of a fixed vector added to a point) and another point,
expressed as a quadratic. -/
theorem dist_smul_vadd_sq (r : ℝ) (v : V) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ * dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ =
⟪v, v⟫ * r * r + 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * r + ⟪p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p₂, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, vadd_vsub_assoc,
real_inner_add_add_self, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right]
ring
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_smul_vadd_sq EuclideanGeometry.dist_smul_vadd_sq
/-- The condition for two points on a line to be equidistant from
another point. -/
theorem dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist {v : V} (p₁ p₂ : P) (hv : v ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ = dist p₁ p₂ ↔ r = 0 ∨ r = -2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ / ⟪v, v⟫ := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg, dist_smul_vadd_sq, ← sub_eq_zero,
add_sub_assoc, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, sub_self]
have hvi : ⟪v, v⟫ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hv
have hd : discrim ⟪v, v⟫ (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) 0 = 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) := by
rw [discrim]
ring
rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff hvi hd, add_left_neg, zero_div, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, ←
mul_sub_right_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_two, mul_assoc, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_mul_left,
mul_div_assoc]
norm_num
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist EuclideanGeometry.dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist
open AffineSubspace FiniteDimensional
/-- Distances `r₁` `r₂` of `p` from two different points `c₁` `c₂` determine at
most two points `p₁` `p₂` in a two-dimensional subspace containing those points
(two circles intersect in at most two points). -/
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P}
[FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = 2) {c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ p : P}
(hc₁s : c₁ ∈ s) (hc₂s : c₂ ∈ s) (hp₁s : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂s : p₂ ∈ s) (hps : p ∈ s) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
(hc : c₁ ≠ c₂) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁c₁ : dist p₁ c₁ = r₁) (hp₂c₁ : dist p₂ c₁ = r₁)
(hpc₁ : dist p c₁ = r₁) (hp₁c₂ : dist p₁ c₂ = r₂) (hp₂c₂ : dist p₂ c₂ = r₂)
(hpc₂ : dist p c₂ = r₂) : p = p₁ ∨ p = p₂ := by
have ho : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq (hp₁c₁.trans hp₂c₁.symm) (hp₁c₂.trans hp₂c₂.symm)
have hop : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq (hp₁c₁.trans hpc₁.symm) (hp₁c₂.trans hpc₂.symm)
let b : Fin 2 → V := ![c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁]
have hb : LinearIndependent ℝ b := by
refine linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ ?_
· intro i
fin_cases i <;> simp [b, hc.symm, hp.symm]
· intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> try exact False.elim (hij rfl)
· exact ho
· rw [real_inner_comm]
exact ho
have hbs : Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range b) = s.direction := by
refine eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [Submodule.span_le, Set.range_subset_iff]
intro i
fin_cases i
· exact vsub_mem_direction hc₂s hc₁s
· exact vsub_mem_direction hp₂s hp₁s
· rw [finrank_span_eq_card hb, Fintype.card_fin, hd]
have hv : ∀ v ∈ s.direction, ∃ t₁ t₂ : ℝ, v = t₁ • (c₂ -ᵥ c₁) + t₂ • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
intro v hv
have hr : Set.range b = {c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁} := by
have hu : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by decide
rw [← Fintype.coe_image_univ, hu]
simp [b]
rw [← hbs, hr, Submodule.mem_span_insert] at hv
rcases hv with ⟨t₁, v', hv', hv⟩
rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton] at hv'
rcases hv' with ⟨t₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t₁, t₂, hv⟩
rcases hv (p -ᵥ p₁) (vsub_mem_direction hps hp₁s) with ⟨t₁, t₂, hpt⟩
simp only [hpt, inner_add_right, inner_smul_right, ho, mul_zero, add_zero,
mul_eq_zero, inner_self_eq_zero, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, hc.symm, or_false_iff] at hop
rw [hop, zero_smul, zero_add, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hpt
subst hpt
have hp' : (p₂ -ᵥ p₁ : V) ≠ 0 := by simp [hp.symm]
have hp₂ : dist ((1 : ℝ) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₁) c₁ = r₁ := by simp [hp₂c₁]
rw [← hp₁c₁, dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist _ _ hp'] at hpc₁ hp₂
simp only [one_ne_zero, false_or_iff] at hp₂
rw [hp₂.symm] at hpc₁
cases' hpc₁ with hpc₁ hpc₁ <;> simp [hpc₁]
#align euclidean_geometry.eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two EuclideanGeometry.eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two
/-- Distances `r₁` `r₂` of `p` from two different points `c₁` `c₂` determine at
most two points `p₁` `p₂` in two-dimensional space (two circles intersect in at
most two points). -/
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_finrank_eq_two [FiniteDimensional ℝ V] (hd : finrank ℝ V = 2)
{c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ p : P} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hc : c₁ ≠ c₂) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁c₁ : dist p₁ c₁ = r₁)
(hp₂c₁ : dist p₂ c₁ = r₁) (hpc₁ : dist p c₁ = r₁) (hp₁c₂ : dist p₁ c₂ = r₂)
(hp₂c₂ : dist p₂ c₂ = r₂) (hpc₂ : dist p c₂ = r₂) : p = p₁ ∨ p = p₂ :=
haveI hd' : finrank ℝ (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P).direction = 2 := by
rw [direction_top, finrank_top]
exact hd
eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two hd' (mem_top ℝ V _) (mem_top ℝ V _)
(mem_top ℝ V _) (mem_top ℝ V _) (mem_top ℝ V _) hc hp hp₁c₁ hp₂c₁ hpc₁ hp₁c₂ hp₂c₂ hpc₂
#align euclidean_geometry.eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_finrank_eq_two EuclideanGeometry.eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_finrank_eq_two
/-- The orthogonal projection of a point onto a nonempty affine
subspace, whose direction is complete, as an unbundled function. This
definition is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
`orthogonalProjection` and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) : P :=
Classical.choose <|
inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_isCompl (nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›)
(mk'_nonempty p s.directionᗮ)
(by
rw [direction_mk' p s.directionᗮ]
exact Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace)
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_fn EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjectionFn
/-- The intersection of the subspace and the orthogonal subspace
through the given point is the `orthogonalProjectionFn` of that
point onto the subspace. This lemma is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjectionFn {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) :
(s : Set P) ∩ mk' p s.directionᗮ = {orthogonalProjectionFn s p} :=
Classical.choose_spec <|
inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_isCompl (nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›)
(mk'_nonempty p s.directionᗮ)
(by
rw [direction_mk' p s.directionᗮ]
exact Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace)
#align euclidean_geometry.inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection_fn EuclideanGeometry.inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjectionFn
/-- The `orthogonalProjectionFn` lies in the given subspace. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version and
should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) : orthogonalProjectionFn s p ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, ← Set.singleton_subset_iff, ← inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjectionFn]
exact Set.inter_subset_left
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_fn_mem EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjectionFn_mem
/-- The `orthogonalProjectionFn` lies in the orthogonal
subspace. This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the
bundled version and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem_orthogonal {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonalProjectionFn s p ∈ mk' p s.directionᗮ := by
rw [← mem_coe, ← Set.singleton_subset_iff, ← inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjectionFn]
exact Set.inter_subset_right
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_fn_mem_orthogonal EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjectionFn_mem_orthogonal
/-- Subtracting `p` from its `orthogonalProjectionFn` produces a
result in the orthogonal direction. This lemma is only intended for
use in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that
is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonalProjectionFn s p -ᵥ p ∈ s.directionᗮ :=
direction_mk' p s.directionᗮ ▸
vsub_mem_direction (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem_orthogonal p) (self_mem_mk' _ _)
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_fn_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjectionFn_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
/-- The orthogonal projection of a point onto a nonempty affine
subspace, whose direction is complete. The corresponding linear map
(mapping a vector to the difference between the projections of two
points whose difference is that vector) is the `orthogonalProjection`
for real inner product spaces, onto the direction of the affine
subspace being projected onto. -/
nonrec def orthogonalProjection (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] : P →ᵃ[ℝ] s where
toFun p := ⟨orthogonalProjectionFn s p, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem p⟩
linear := orthogonalProjection s.direction
map_vadd' p v := by
have hs : ((orthogonalProjection s.direction) v : V) +ᵥ orthogonalProjectionFn s p ∈ s :=
vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (orthogonalProjection s.direction v).2
(orthogonalProjectionFn_mem p)
have ho :
((orthogonalProjection s.direction) v : V) +ᵥ orthogonalProjectionFn s p ∈
mk' (v +ᵥ p) s.directionᗮ := by
rw [← vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (self_mem_mk' _ _) _, direction_mk',
vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc]
refine Submodule.add_mem _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal p) ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_orthogonal']
intro w hw
rw [← neg_sub, inner_neg_left, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, neg_zero]
have hm :
((orthogonalProjection s.direction) v : V) +ᵥ orthogonalProjectionFn s p ∈
({orthogonalProjectionFn s (v +ᵥ p)} : Set P) := by
rw [← inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjectionFn (v +ᵥ p)]
exact Set.mem_inter hs ho
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hm
ext
exact hm.symm
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonalProjectionFn s p = orthogonalProjection s p :=
rfl
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_fn_eq EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjectionFn_eq
/-- The linear map corresponding to `orthogonalProjection`. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_linear {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] :
(orthogonalProjection s).linear = _root_.orthogonalProjection s.direction :=
rfl
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_linear EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_linear
/-- The intersection of the subspace and the orthogonal subspace
through the given point is the `orthogonalProjection` of that point
onto the subspace. -/
theorem inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjection {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) :
(s : Set P) ∩ mk' p s.directionᗮ = {↑(orthogonalProjection s p)} := by
rw [← orthogonalProjectionFn_eq]
exact inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjectionFn p
#align euclidean_geometry.inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection EuclideanGeometry.inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjection
/-- The `orthogonalProjection` lies in the given subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) : ↑(orthogonalProjection s p) ∈ s :=
(orthogonalProjection s p).2
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_mem EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_mem
/-- The `orthogonalProjection` lies in the orthogonal subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) :
↑(orthogonalProjection s p) ∈ mk' p s.directionᗮ :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_mem_orthogonal p
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_mem_orthogonal EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal
/-- Subtracting a point in the given subspace from the
`orthogonalProjection` produces a result in the direction of the
given subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_vsub_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] {p1 : P} (p2 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
↑(orthogonalProjection s p2 -ᵥ ⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s.direction) ∈ s.direction :=
(orthogonalProjection s p2 -ᵥ ⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s.direction).2
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_vsub_mem_direction EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_vsub_mem_direction
/-- Subtracting the `orthogonalProjection` from a point in the given
subspace produces a result in the direction of the given subspace. -/
theorem vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] {p1 : P} (p2 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
↑((⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s) -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p2 : s.direction) ∈ s.direction :=
((⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s) -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p2 : s.direction).2
#align euclidean_geometry.vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction EuclideanGeometry.vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in
the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] {p : P} : ↑(orthogonalProjection s p) = p ↔ p ∈ s := by
constructor
· exact fun h => h ▸ orthogonalProjection_mem p
· intro h
have hp : p ∈ (s : Set P) ∩ mk' p s.directionᗮ := ⟨h, self_mem_mk' p _⟩
rw [inter_eq_singleton_orthogonalProjection p] at hp
symm
exact hp
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : s) : orthogonalProjection s p = p := by
ext
rw [orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff]
exact p.2
#align euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self
/-- Orthogonal projection is idempotent. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Basic.lean | 382 | 387 | theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonalProjection (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonalProjection s (orthogonalProjection s p) = orthogonalProjection s p := by |
ext
rw [orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff]
exact orthogonalProjection_mem p
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Convergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.OptionalStopping
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Centering
#align_import probability.martingale.borel_cantelli from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Generalized Borel-Cantelli lemma
This file proves Lévy's generalized Borel-Cantelli lemma which is a generalization of the
Borel-Cantelli lemmas. With this generalization, one can easily deduce the Borel-Cantelli lemmas
by choosing appropriate filtrations. This file also contains the one sided martingale bound which
is required to prove the generalized Borel-Cantelli.
**Note**: the usual Borel-Cantelli lemmas are not in this file. See
`MeasureTheory.measure_limsup_eq_zero` for the first (which does not depend on the results here),
and `ProbabilityTheory.measure_limsup_eq_one` for the second (which does).
## Main results
- `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto`: the one sided martingale bound: given
a submartingale `f` with uniformly bounded differences, the set for which `f` converges is almost
everywhere equal to the set for which it is bounded.
- `MeasureTheory.ae_mem_limsup_atTop_iff`: Lévy's generalized Borel-Cantelli:
given a filtration `ℱ` and a sequence of sets `s` such that `s n ∈ ℱ n` for all `n`,
`limsup atTop s` is almost everywhere equal to the set for which `∑ ℙ[s (n + 1)∣ℱ n] = ∞`.
-/
open Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory BigOperators Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
{ω : Ω}
/-!
### One sided martingale bound
-/
-- TODO: `leastGE` should be defined taking values in `WithTop ℕ` once the `stoppedProcess`
-- refactor is complete
/-- `leastGE f r n` is the stopping time corresponding to the first time `f ≥ r`. -/
noncomputable def leastGE (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :=
hitting f (Set.Ici r) 0 n
#align measure_theory.least_ge MeasureTheory.leastGE
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (leastGE f r n) :=
hitting_isStoppingTime hf measurableSet_Ici
#align measure_theory.adapted.is_stopping_time_least_ge MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE
theorem leastGE_le {i : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (ω : Ω) : leastGE f r i ω ≤ i :=
hitting_le ω
#align measure_theory.least_ge_le MeasureTheory.leastGE_le
-- The following four lemmas shows `leastGE` behaves like a stopped process. Ideally we should
-- define `leastGE` as a stopping time and take its stopped process. However, we can't do that
-- with our current definition since a stopping time takes only finite indicies. An upcomming
-- refactor should hopefully make it possible to have stopping times taking infinity as a value
theorem leastGE_mono {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (r : ℝ) (ω : Ω) : leastGE f r n ω ≤ leastGE f r m ω :=
hitting_mono hnm
#align measure_theory.least_ge_mono MeasureTheory.leastGE_mono
theorem leastGE_eq_min (π : Ω → ℕ) (r : ℝ) (ω : Ω) {n : ℕ} (hπn : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ n) :
leastGE f r (π ω) ω = min (π ω) (leastGE f r n ω) := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (le_min (leastGE_le _) (leastGE_mono (hπn ω) r ω)) ?_
by_cases hle : π ω ≤ leastGE f r n ω
· rw [min_eq_left hle, leastGE]
by_cases h : ∃ j ∈ Set.Icc 0 (π ω), f j ω ∈ Set.Ici r
· refine hle.trans (Eq.le ?_)
rw [leastGE, ← hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists (hπn ω) h]
· simp only [hitting, if_neg h, le_rfl]
· rw [min_eq_right (not_le.1 hle).le, leastGE, leastGE, ←
hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists (hπn ω) _]
rw [not_le, leastGE, hitting_lt_iff _ (hπn ω)] at hle
exact
let ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := hle
⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
#align measure_theory.least_ge_eq_min MeasureTheory.leastGE_eq_min
theorem stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (π : Ω → ℕ) (r : ℝ) {n : ℕ}
(hπn : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ n) : stoppedValue (fun i => stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) π =
stoppedValue (stoppedProcess f (leastGE f r n)) π := by
ext1 ω
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [stoppedProcess, stoppedValue]
rw [leastGE_eq_min _ _ _ hπn]
#align measure_theory.stopped_value_stopped_value_least_ge MeasureTheory.stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE
theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (r : ℝ) :
Submartingale (fun i => stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) ℱ μ := by
rw [submartingale_iff_expected_stoppedValue_mono]
· intro σ π hσ hπ hσ_le_π hπ_bdd
obtain ⟨n, hπ_le_n⟩ := hπ_bdd
simp_rw [stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE f σ r fun i => (hσ_le_π i).trans (hπ_le_n i)]
simp_rw [stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE f π r hπ_le_n]
refine hf.expected_stoppedValue_mono ?_ ?_ ?_ fun ω => (min_le_left _ _).trans (hπ_le_n ω)
· exact hσ.min (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _)
· exact hπ.min (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _)
· exact fun ω => min_le_min (hσ_le_π ω) le_rfl
· exact fun i => stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le hf.adapted.progMeasurable_of_discrete
(hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _) leastGE_le
· exact fun i => integrable_stoppedValue _ (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _) hf.integrable
leastGE_le
#align measure_theory.submartingale.stopped_value_least_ge MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE
variable {r : ℝ} {R : ℝ≥0}
theorem norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i) ω ≤ r + R := by
filter_upwards [hbdd] with ω hbddω
change f (leastGE f r i ω) ω ≤ r + R
by_cases heq : leastGE f r i ω = 0
· rw [heq, hf0, Pi.zero_apply]
exact add_nonneg hr R.coe_nonneg
· obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero heq
rw [hk, add_comm, ← sub_le_iff_le_add]
have := not_mem_of_lt_hitting (hk.symm ▸ k.lt_succ_self : k < leastGE f r i ω) (zero_le _)
simp only [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_Iic, Set.mem_Ici, not_or, not_le] at this
exact (sub_lt_sub_left this _).le.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (hbddω _))
#align measure_theory.norm_stopped_value_least_ge_le MeasureTheory.norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le
theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
snorm (stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) 1 μ ≤ 2 * μ Set.univ * ENNReal.ofReal (r + R) := by
refine snorm_one_le_of_le' ((hf.stoppedValue_leastGE r).integrable _) ?_
(norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le hr hf0 hbdd i)
rw [← integral_univ]
refine le_trans ?_ ((hf.stoppedValue_leastGE r).setIntegral_le (zero_le _) MeasurableSet.univ)
simp_rw [stoppedValue, leastGE, hitting_of_le le_rfl, hf0, integral_zero', le_rfl]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.stopped_value_least_ge_snorm_le MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le
theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
snorm (stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) 1 μ ≤
ENNReal.toNNReal (2 * μ Set.univ * ENNReal.ofReal (r + R)) := by
refine (hf.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le hr hf0 hbdd i).trans ?_
simp [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_ne_top μ _), ENNReal.coe_toNNReal]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.stopped_value_least_ge_snorm_le' MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le'
/-- This lemma is superseded by `Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto`. -/
theorem Submartingale.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bddAbove_aux [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) → ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
have ht :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i : ℕ, ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => stoppedValue f (leastGE f i n) ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
exact fun i => Submartingale.exists_ae_tendsto_of_bdd (hf.stoppedValue_leastGE i)
(hf.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le' i.cast_nonneg hf0 hbdd)
filter_upwards [ht] with ω hω hωb
rw [BddAbove] at hωb
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_nat_gt hωb.some
have hib : ∀ n, f n ω < i := by
intro n
exact lt_of_le_of_lt ((mem_upperBounds.1 hωb.some_mem) _ ⟨n, rfl⟩) hi
have heq : ∀ n, stoppedValue f (leastGE f i n) ω = f n ω := by
intro n
rw [leastGE]; unfold hitting; rw [stoppedValue]
rw [if_neg]
simp only [Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_Ici]
push_neg
exact fun j _ => hib j
simp only [← heq, hω i]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bdd_above_aux MeasureTheory.Submartingale.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bddAbove_aux
theorem Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto_aux [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) ↔ ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
filter_upwards [hf.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bddAbove_aux hf0 hbdd] with ω hω using
⟨hω, fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => hc.bddAbove_range⟩
#align measure_theory.submartingale.bdd_above_iff_exists_tendsto_aux MeasureTheory.Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto_aux
/-- One sided martingale bound: If `f` is a submartingale which has uniformly bounded differences,
then for almost every `ω`, `f n ω` is bounded above (in `n`) if and only if it converges. -/
theorem Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) ↔ ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
set g : ℕ → Ω → ℝ := fun n ω => f n ω - f 0 ω
have hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_martingale (martingale_const_fun _ _ (hf.adapted 0) (hf.integrable 0))
have hg0 : g 0 = 0 := by
ext ω
simp only [g, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
have hgbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i : ℕ, |g (i + 1) ω - g i ω| ≤ ↑R := by
simpa only [g, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
filter_upwards [hg.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto_aux hg0 hgbdd] with ω hω
convert hω using 1
· refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h <;>
refine ⟨b + |f 0 ω|, fun y hy => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hy
· simp_rw [g, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact add_le_add (hb ⟨n, rfl⟩) (neg_le_abs _)
· exact sub_le_iff_le_add.1 (le_trans (sub_le_sub_left (le_abs_self _) _) (hb ⟨n, rfl⟩))
· refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
· exact ⟨c - f 0 ω, hc.sub_const _⟩
· refine ⟨c + f 0 ω, ?_⟩
have := hc.add_const (f 0 ω)
simpa only [g, sub_add_cancel]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.bdd_above_iff_exists_tendsto MeasureTheory.Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto
/-!
### Lévy's generalization of the Borel-Cantelli lemma
Lévy's generalization of the Borel-Cantelli lemma states that: given a natural number indexed
filtration $(\mathcal{F}_n)$, and a sequence of sets $(s_n)$ such that for all
$n$, $s_n \in \mathcal{F}_n$, $limsup_n s_n$ is almost everywhere equal to the set for which
$\sum_n \mathbb{P}[s_n \mid \mathcal{F}_n] = \infty$.
The proof strategy follows by constructing a martingale satisfying the one sided martingale bound.
In particular, we define
$$
f_n := \sum_{k < n} \mathbf{1}_{s_{n + 1}} - \mathbb{P}[s_{n + 1} \mid \mathcal{F}_n].
$$
Then, as a martingale is both a sub and a super-martingale, the set for which it is unbounded from
above must agree with the set for which it is unbounded from below almost everywhere. Thus, it
can only converge to $\pm \infty$ with probability 0. Thus, by considering
$$
\limsup_n s_n = \{\sum_n \mathbf{1}_{s_n} = \infty\}
$$
almost everywhere, the result follows.
-/
theorem Martingale.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) ↔ BddBelow (Set.range fun n => f n ω) := by
have hbdd' : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |(-f) (i + 1) ω - (-f) i ω| ≤ R := by
filter_upwards [hbdd] with ω hω i
erw [← abs_neg, neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_add_eq_sub]
exact hω i
have hup := hf.submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto hbdd
have hdown := hf.neg.submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto hbdd'
filter_upwards [hup, hdown] with ω hω₁ hω₂
have : (∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c)) ↔
∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => (-f) n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
· exact ⟨-c, hc.neg⟩
· refine ⟨-c, ?_⟩
convert hc.neg
simp only [neg_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
rw [hω₁, this, ← hω₂]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ <;> refine ⟨-c, fun ω hω => ?_⟩
· rw [mem_upperBounds] at hc
refine neg_le.2 (hc _ ?_)
simpa only [Pi.neg_apply, Set.mem_range, neg_inj]
· rw [mem_lowerBounds] at hc
simp_rw [Set.mem_range, Pi.neg_apply, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hω
refine le_neg.1 (hc _ ?_)
simpa only [Set.mem_range]
#align measure_theory.martingale.bdd_above_range_iff_bdd_below_range MeasureTheory.Martingale.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range
theorem Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atTop [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ¬Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop atTop := by
filter_upwards [hf.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range hbdd] with ω hω htop using
unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop htop (hω.2 <| bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop htop)
#align measure_theory.martingale.ae_not_tendsto_at_top_at_top MeasureTheory.Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atTop
theorem Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atBot [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ¬Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop atBot := by
filter_upwards [hf.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range hbdd] with ω hω htop using
unbounded_of_tendsto_atBot htop (hω.1 <| bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot htop)
#align measure_theory.martingale.ae_not_tendsto_at_top_at_bot MeasureTheory.Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atBot
namespace BorelCantelli
/-- Auxiliary definition required to prove Lévy's generalization of the Borel-Cantelli lemmas for
which we will take the martingale part. -/
noncomputable def process (s : ℕ → Set Ω) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ℝ :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (s (k + 1)).indicator 1
#align measure_theory.borel_cantelli.process MeasureTheory.BorelCantelli.process
variable {s : ℕ → Set Ω}
theorem process_zero : process s 0 = 0 := by rw [process, Finset.range_zero, Finset.sum_empty]
#align measure_theory.borel_cantelli.process_zero MeasureTheory.BorelCantelli.process_zero
theorem adapted_process (hs : ∀ n, MeasurableSet[ℱ n] (s n)) : Adapted ℱ (process s) := fun _ =>
Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum' _ fun _ hk =>
stronglyMeasurable_one.indicator <| ℱ.mono (Finset.mem_range.1 hk) _ <| hs _
#align measure_theory.borel_cantelli.adapted_process MeasureTheory.BorelCantelli.adapted_process
theorem martingalePart_process_ae_eq (ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0) (μ : Measure Ω) (s : ℕ → Set Ω) (n : ℕ) :
martingalePart (process s) ℱ μ n =
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, ((s (k + 1)).indicator 1 - μ[(s (k + 1)).indicator 1|ℱ k]) := by
simp only [martingalePart_eq_sum, process_zero, zero_add]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun k _ => ?_
simp only [process, Finset.sum_range_succ_sub_sum]
#align measure_theory.borel_cantelli.martingale_part_process_ae_eq MeasureTheory.BorelCantelli.martingalePart_process_ae_eq
theorem predictablePart_process_ae_eq (ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0) (μ : Measure Ω) (s : ℕ → Set Ω)
(n : ℕ) : predictablePart (process s) ℱ μ n =
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, μ[(s (k + 1)).indicator (1 : Ω → ℝ)|ℱ k] := by
have := martingalePart_process_ae_eq ℱ μ s n
simp_rw [martingalePart, process, Finset.sum_sub_distrib] at this
exact sub_right_injective this
#align measure_theory.borel_cantelli.predictable_part_process_ae_eq MeasureTheory.BorelCantelli.predictablePart_process_ae_eq
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/BorelCantelli.lean | 311 | 317 | theorem process_difference_le (s : ℕ → Set Ω) (ω : Ω) (n : ℕ) :
|process s (n + 1) ω - process s n ω| ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0) := by |
norm_cast
rw [process, process, Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_apply,
Finset.sum_range_succ_sub_sum, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
refine Set.indicator_le' (fun _ _ => ?_) (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
rw [Pi.one_apply, norm_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Iso
#align_import category_theory.natural_isomorphism from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
/-!
# Natural isomorphisms
For the most part, natural isomorphisms are just another sort of isomorphism.
We provide some special support for extracting components:
* if `α : F ≅ G`, then `a.app X : F.obj X ≅ G.obj X`,
and building natural isomorphisms from components:
*
```
NatIso.ofComponents
(app : ∀ X : C, F.obj X ≅ G.obj X)
(naturality : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), F.map f ≫ (app Y).hom = (app X).hom ≫ G.map f) :
F ≅ G
```
only needing to check naturality in one direction.
## Implementation
Note that `NatIso` is a namespace without a corresponding definition;
we put some declarations that are specifically about natural isomorphisms in the `Iso`
namespace so that they are available using dot notation.
-/
open CategoryTheory
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
namespace CategoryTheory
open NatTrans
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] {E : Type u₃}
[Category.{v₃} E]
namespace Iso
/-- The application of a natural isomorphism to an object. We put this definition in a different
namespace, so that we can use `α.app` -/
@[simps]
def app {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) (X : C) :
F.obj X ≅ G.obj X where
hom := α.hom.app X
inv := α.inv.app X
hom_inv_id := by rw [← comp_app, Iso.hom_inv_id]; rfl
inv_hom_id := by rw [← comp_app, Iso.inv_hom_id]; rfl
#align category_theory.iso.app CategoryTheory.Iso.app
#align category_theory.iso.app_hom CategoryTheory.Iso.app_hom
#align category_theory.iso.app_inv CategoryTheory.Iso.app_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_id_app {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) (X : C) :
α.hom.app X ≫ α.inv.app X = 𝟙 (F.obj X) :=
congr_fun (congr_arg NatTrans.app α.hom_inv_id) X
#align category_theory.iso.hom_inv_id_app CategoryTheory.Iso.hom_inv_id_app
#align category_theory.iso.hom_inv_id_app_assoc CategoryTheory.Iso.hom_inv_id_app_assoc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_id_app {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) (X : C) :
α.inv.app X ≫ α.hom.app X = 𝟙 (G.obj X) :=
congr_fun (congr_arg NatTrans.app α.inv_hom_id) X
#align category_theory.iso.inv_hom_id_app CategoryTheory.Iso.inv_hom_id_app
#align category_theory.iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc CategoryTheory.Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc
end Iso
namespace NatIso
open CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor
@[simp]
theorem trans_app {F G H : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) (β : G ≅ H) (X : C) :
(α ≪≫ β).app X = α.app X ≪≫ β.app X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.nat_iso.trans_app CategoryTheory.NatIso.trans_app
theorem app_hom {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) (X : C) : (α.app X).hom = α.hom.app X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.nat_iso.app_hom CategoryTheory.NatIso.app_hom
theorem app_inv {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) (X : C) : (α.app X).inv = α.inv.app X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.nat_iso.app_inv CategoryTheory.NatIso.app_inv
variable {F G : C ⥤ D}
instance hom_app_isIso (α : F ≅ G) (X : C) : IsIso (α.hom.app X) :=
⟨⟨α.inv.app X,
⟨by rw [← comp_app, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← id_app], by rw [← comp_app, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← id_app]⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.nat_iso.hom_app_is_iso CategoryTheory.NatIso.hom_app_isIso
instance inv_app_isIso (α : F ≅ G) (X : C) : IsIso (α.inv.app X) :=
⟨⟨α.hom.app X,
⟨by rw [← comp_app, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← id_app], by rw [← comp_app, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← id_app]⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.nat_iso.inv_app_is_iso CategoryTheory.NatIso.inv_app_isIso
section
/-!
Unfortunately we need a separate set of cancellation lemmas for components of natural isomorphisms,
because the `simp` normal form is `α.hom.app X`, rather than `α.app.hom X`.
(With the later, the morphism would be visibly part of an isomorphism, so general lemmas about
isomorphisms would apply.)
In the future, we should consider a redesign that changes this simp norm form,
but for now it breaks too many proofs.
-/
variable (α : F ≅ G)
@[simp]
theorem cancel_natIso_hom_left {X : C} {Z : D} (g g' : G.obj X ⟶ Z) :
α.hom.app X ≫ g = α.hom.app X ≫ g' ↔ g = g' := by simp only [cancel_epi, refl]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.cancel_nat_iso_hom_left CategoryTheory.NatIso.cancel_natIso_hom_left
@[simp]
theorem cancel_natIso_inv_left {X : C} {Z : D} (g g' : F.obj X ⟶ Z) :
α.inv.app X ≫ g = α.inv.app X ≫ g' ↔ g = g' := by simp only [cancel_epi, refl]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.cancel_nat_iso_inv_left CategoryTheory.NatIso.cancel_natIso_inv_left
@[simp]
theorem cancel_natIso_hom_right {X : D} {Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
f ≫ α.hom.app Y = f' ≫ α.hom.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono, refl]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.cancel_nat_iso_hom_right CategoryTheory.NatIso.cancel_natIso_hom_right
@[simp]
theorem cancel_natIso_inv_right {X : D} {Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ G.obj Y) :
f ≫ α.inv.app Y = f' ≫ α.inv.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono, refl]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.cancel_nat_iso_inv_right CategoryTheory.NatIso.cancel_natIso_inv_right
@[simp]
theorem cancel_natIso_hom_right_assoc {W X X' : D} {Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ F.obj Y)
(f' : W ⟶ X') (g' : X' ⟶ F.obj Y) :
f ≫ g ≫ α.hom.app Y = f' ≫ g' ≫ α.hom.app Y ↔ f ≫ g = f' ≫ g' := by
simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono, refl]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.cancel_nat_iso_hom_right_assoc CategoryTheory.NatIso.cancel_natIso_hom_right_assoc
@[simp]
theorem cancel_natIso_inv_right_assoc {W X X' : D} {Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ G.obj Y)
(f' : W ⟶ X') (g' : X' ⟶ G.obj Y) :
f ≫ g ≫ α.inv.app Y = f' ≫ g' ≫ α.inv.app Y ↔ f ≫ g = f' ≫ g' := by
simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono, refl]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.cancel_nat_iso_inv_right_assoc CategoryTheory.NatIso.cancel_natIso_inv_right_assoc
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_app {F G : C ⥤ D} (e : F ≅ G) (X : C) : inv (e.inv.app X) = e.hom.app X := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.nat_iso.inv_inv_app CategoryTheory.NatIso.inv_inv_app
end
variable {X Y : C}
theorem naturality_1 (α : F ≅ G) (f : X ⟶ Y) : α.inv.app X ≫ F.map f ≫ α.hom.app Y = G.map f := by
simp
#align category_theory.nat_iso.naturality_1 CategoryTheory.NatIso.naturality_1
theorem naturality_2 (α : F ≅ G) (f : X ⟶ Y) : α.hom.app X ≫ G.map f ≫ α.inv.app Y = F.map f := by
simp
#align category_theory.nat_iso.naturality_2 CategoryTheory.NatIso.naturality_2
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/NatIso.lean | 176 | 177 | theorem naturality_1' (α : F ⟶ G) (f : X ⟶ Y) {_ : IsIso (α.app X)} :
inv (α.app X) ≫ F.map f ≫ α.app Y = G.map f := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.SmoothManifoldWithCorners
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.LocalInvariantProperties
#align_import geometry.manifold.cont_mdiff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e5ab837fc252451f3eb9124ae6e7b6f57455e7b9"
/-!
# Smooth functions between smooth manifolds
We define `Cⁿ` functions between smooth manifolds, as functions which are `Cⁿ` in charts, and prove
basic properties of these notions.
## Main definitions and statements
Let `M` and `M'` be two smooth manifolds, with respect to model with corners `I` and `I'`. Let
`f : M → M'`.
* `ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` within the set `s`
around the point `x`.
* `ContMDiffAt I I' n f x` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` around `x`.
* `ContMDiffOn I I' n f s` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` on the set `s`
* `ContMDiff I I' n f` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ`.
We also give some basic properties of smooth functions between manifolds, following the API of
smooth functions between vector spaces.
See `Basic.lean` for further basic properties of smooth functions between smooth manifolds,
`NormedSpace.lean` for the equivalence of manifold-smoothness to usual smoothness,
`Product.lean` for smoothness results related to the product of manifolds and
`Atlas.lean` for smoothness of atlas members and local structomorphisms.
## Implementation details
Many properties follow for free from the corresponding properties of functions in vector spaces,
as being `Cⁿ` is a local property invariant under the smooth groupoid. We take advantage of the
general machinery developed in `LocalInvariantProperties.lean` to get these properties
automatically. For instance, the fact that being `Cⁿ` does not depend on the chart one considers
is given by `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`.
For this to work, the definition of `ContMDiffWithinAt` and friends has to
follow definitionally the setup of local invariant properties. Still, we recast the definition
in terms of extended charts in `contMDiffOn_iff` and `contMDiff_iff`.
-/
open Set Function Filter ChartedSpace SmoothManifoldWithCorners
open scoped Topology Manifold
/-! ### Definition of smooth functions between manifolds -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
-- declare a smooth manifold `M` over the pair `(E, H)`.
{E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]
-- declare a smooth manifold `M'` over the pair `(E', H')`.
{E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M']
-- declare a manifold `M''` over the pair `(E'', H'')`.
{E'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
-- declare a smooth manifold `N` over the pair `(F, G)`.
{F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G]
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G} {N : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N] [ChartedSpace G N]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners J N]
-- declare a smooth manifold `N'` over the pair `(F', G')`.
{F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G']
{J' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F' G'} {N' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N'] [ChartedSpace G' N']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners J' N']
-- F₁, F₂, F₃, F₄ are normed spaces
{F₁ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₁] {F₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₂]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F₂] {F₃ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₃] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₃] {F₄ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₄] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₄]
-- declare functions, sets, points and smoothness indices
{e : PartialHomeomorph M H}
{e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {f f₁ : M → M'} {s s₁ t : Set M} {x : M} {m n : ℕ∞}
/-- Property in the model space of a model with corners of being `C^n` within at set at a point,
when read in the model vector space. This property will be lifted to manifolds to define smooth
functions between manifolds. -/
def ContDiffWithinAtProp (n : ℕ∞) (f : H → H') (s : Set H) (x : H) : Prop :=
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x)
#align cont_diff_within_at_prop ContDiffWithinAtProp
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source {f : E → H'} {s : Set E} {x : E} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (I' ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, modelWithCornersSelf_coe, range_id, inter_univ,
modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm, CompTriple.comp_eq, preimage_id_eq, id_eq]
#align cont_diff_within_at_prop_self_source contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self {f : E → E'} {s : Set E} {x : E} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source 𝓘(𝕜, E')
#align cont_diff_within_at_prop_self contDiffWithinAtProp_self
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self_target {f : H → E'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n f s x ↔
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) :=
Iff.rfl
#align cont_diff_within_at_prop_self_target contDiffWithinAtProp_self_target
/-- Being `Cⁿ` in the model space is a local property, invariant under smooth maps. Therefore,
it will lift nicely to manifolds. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp (n : ℕ∞) :
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I).LocalInvariantProp (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I')
(ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n) where
is_local {s x u f} u_open xu := by
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ u) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' u := by
simp only [inter_right_comm, preimage_inter]
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, ContDiffWithinAtProp, this]
symm
apply contDiffWithinAt_inter
have : u ∈ 𝓝 (I.symm (I x)) := by
rw [ModelWithCorners.left_inv]
exact u_open.mem_nhds xu
apply ContinuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds I.continuous_symm.continuousAt this
right_invariance' {s x f e} he hx h := by
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have : I x = (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I (e x)) := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
rw [this] at h
have : I (e x) ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' e.target ∩ range I := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he).2.contDiffWithinAt this
convert (h.comp' _ (this.of_le le_top)).mono_of_mem _ using 1
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
refine mem_nhdsWithin.mpr
⟨I.symm ⁻¹' e.target, e.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm, by
simp_rw [mem_preimage, I.left_inv, e.mapsTo hx], ?_⟩
mfld_set_tac
congr_of_forall {s x f g} h hx hf := by
apply hf.congr
· intro y hy
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
simp only [h, hy, mfld_simps]
· simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
left_invariance' {s x f e'} he' hs hx h := by
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have A : (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I x) ∈ I'.symm ⁻¹' e'.source ∩ range I' := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he').1.contDiffWithinAt A
convert (this.of_le le_top).comp _ h _
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
· intro y hy; simp only [mfld_simps] at hy; simpa only [hy, mfld_simps] using hs hy.1
#align cont_diff_within_at_local_invariant_prop contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem (n : ℕ∞) ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄ (hts : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x)
(h : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n f t x := by
refine h.mono_of_mem ?_
refine inter_mem ?_ (mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin inter_subset_right)
rwa [← Filter.mem_map, ← I.image_eq, I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image]
#align cont_diff_within_at_prop_mono_of_mem contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_id (x : H) : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I n id univ x := by
simp only [ContDiffWithinAtProp, id_comp, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
have : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n id (range I) (I x) := contDiff_id.contDiffAt.contDiffWithinAt
refine this.congr (fun y hy => ?_) ?_
· simp only [ModelWithCorners.right_inv I hy, mfld_simps]
· simp only [mfld_simps]
#align cont_diff_within_at_prop_id contDiffWithinAtProp_id
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable within a set at a point in a manifold if
it is continuous and it is `n` times continuously differentiable in this set around this point, when
read in the preferred chart at this point. -/
def ContMDiffWithinAt (n : ℕ∞) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :=
LiftPropWithinAt (ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n) f s x
#align cont_mdiff_within_at ContMDiffWithinAt
/-- Abbreviation for `ContMDiffWithinAt I I' ⊤ f s x`. See also documentation for `Smooth`.
-/
abbrev SmoothWithinAt (f : M → M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :=
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' ⊤ f s x
#align smooth_within_at SmoothWithinAt
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable at a point in a manifold if
it is continuous and it is `n` times continuously differentiable around this point, when
read in the preferred chart at this point. -/
def ContMDiffAt (n : ℕ∞) (f : M → M') (x : M) :=
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f univ x
#align cont_mdiff_at ContMDiffAt
theorem contMDiffAt_iff {n : ℕ∞} {f : M → M'} {x : M} :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x) :=
liftPropAt_iff.trans <| by rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, preimage_univ, univ_inter]; rfl
#align cont_mdiff_at_iff contMDiffAt_iff
/-- Abbreviation for `ContMDiffAt I I' ⊤ f x`. See also documentation for `Smooth`. -/
abbrev SmoothAt (f : M → M') (x : M) :=
ContMDiffAt I I' ⊤ f x
#align smooth_at SmoothAt
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable in a set of a manifold if it is continuous
and, for any pair of points, it is `n` times continuously differentiable on this set in the charts
around these points. -/
def ContMDiffOn (n : ℕ∞) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) :=
∀ x ∈ s, ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x
#align cont_mdiff_on ContMDiffOn
/-- Abbreviation for `ContMDiffOn I I' ⊤ f s`. See also documentation for `Smooth`. -/
abbrev SmoothOn (f : M → M') (s : Set M) :=
ContMDiffOn I I' ⊤ f s
#align smooth_on SmoothOn
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable in a manifold if it is continuous
and, for any pair of points, it is `n` times continuously differentiable in the charts
around these points. -/
def ContMDiff (n : ℕ∞) (f : M → M') :=
∀ x, ContMDiffAt I I' n f x
#align cont_mdiff ContMDiff
/-- Abbreviation for `ContMDiff I I' ⊤ f`.
Short note to work with these abbreviations: a lemma of the form `ContMDiffFoo.bar` will
apply fine to an assumption `SmoothFoo` using dot notation or normal notation.
If the consequence `bar` of the lemma involves `ContDiff`, it is still better to restate
the lemma replacing `ContDiff` with `Smooth` both in the assumption and in the conclusion,
to make it possible to use `Smooth` consistently.
This also applies to `SmoothAt`, `SmoothOn` and `SmoothWithinAt`. -/
abbrev Smooth (f : M → M') :=
ContMDiff I I' ⊤ f
#align smooth Smooth
variable {I I'}
/-! ### Deducing smoothness from higher smoothness -/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.of_le (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x) (le : m ≤ n) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' m f s x := by
simp only [ContMDiffWithinAt, LiftPropWithinAt] at hf ⊢
exact ⟨hf.1, hf.2.of_le le⟩
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.of_le ContMDiffWithinAt.of_le
theorem ContMDiffAt.of_le (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (le : m ≤ n) : ContMDiffAt I I' m f x :=
ContMDiffWithinAt.of_le hf le
#align cont_mdiff_at.of_le ContMDiffAt.of_le
theorem ContMDiffOn.of_le (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (le : m ≤ n) : ContMDiffOn I I' m f s :=
fun x hx => (hf x hx).of_le le
#align cont_mdiff_on.of_le ContMDiffOn.of_le
theorem ContMDiff.of_le (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (le : m ≤ n) : ContMDiff I I' m f := fun x =>
(hf x).of_le le
#align cont_mdiff.of_le ContMDiff.of_le
/-! ### Basic properties of smooth functions between manifolds -/
theorem ContMDiff.smooth (h : ContMDiff I I' ⊤ f) : Smooth I I' f :=
h
#align cont_mdiff.smooth ContMDiff.smooth
theorem Smooth.contMDiff (h : Smooth I I' f) : ContMDiff I I' n f :=
h.of_le le_top
#align smooth.cont_mdiff Smooth.contMDiff
theorem ContMDiffOn.smoothOn (h : ContMDiffOn I I' ⊤ f s) : SmoothOn I I' f s :=
h
#align cont_mdiff_on.smooth_on ContMDiffOn.smoothOn
theorem SmoothOn.contMDiffOn (h : SmoothOn I I' f s) : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s :=
h.of_le le_top
#align smooth_on.cont_mdiff_on SmoothOn.contMDiffOn
theorem ContMDiffAt.smoothAt (h : ContMDiffAt I I' ⊤ f x) : SmoothAt I I' f x :=
h
#align cont_mdiff_at.smooth_at ContMDiffAt.smoothAt
theorem SmoothAt.contMDiffAt (h : SmoothAt I I' f x) : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
h.of_le le_top
#align smooth_at.cont_mdiff_at SmoothAt.contMDiffAt
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.smoothWithinAt (h : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' ⊤ f s x) :
SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x :=
h
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.smooth_within_at ContMDiffWithinAt.smoothWithinAt
theorem SmoothWithinAt.contMDiffWithinAt (h : SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x :=
h.of_le le_top
#align smooth_within_at.cont_mdiff_within_at SmoothWithinAt.contMDiffWithinAt
theorem ContMDiff.contMDiffAt (h : ContMDiff I I' n f) : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
h x
#align cont_mdiff.cont_mdiff_at ContMDiff.contMDiffAt
theorem Smooth.smoothAt (h : Smooth I I' f) : SmoothAt I I' f x :=
ContMDiff.contMDiffAt h
#align smooth.smooth_at Smooth.smoothAt
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_univ : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f univ x ↔ ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
Iff.rfl
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_univ contMDiffWithinAt_univ
theorem smoothWithinAt_univ : SmoothWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ SmoothAt I I' f x :=
contMDiffWithinAt_univ
#align smooth_within_at_univ smoothWithinAt_univ
theorem contMDiffOn_univ : ContMDiffOn I I' n f univ ↔ ContMDiff I I' n f := by
simp only [ContMDiffOn, ContMDiff, contMDiffWithinAt_univ, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ]
#align cont_mdiff_on_univ contMDiffOn_univ
theorem smoothOn_univ : SmoothOn I I' f univ ↔ Smooth I I' f :=
contMDiffOn_univ
#align smooth_on_univ smoothOn_univ
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff contMDiffWithinAt_iff
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `contMDiffWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff' :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [ContMDiffWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => contDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds <|
hc.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range I I'
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff' contMDiffWithinAt_iff'
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContMDiffWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _ _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, ContDiffWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend, PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply, id_comp]
rfl
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_target contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target
theorem smoothWithinAt_iff :
SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ∞ (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) :=
contMDiffWithinAt_iff
#align smooth_within_at_iff smoothWithinAt_iff
theorem smoothWithinAt_iff_target :
SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ SmoothWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x :=
contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target
#align smooth_within_at_iff_target smoothWithinAt_iff_target
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_target {x : M} :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [ContMDiffAt, ContMDiffAt, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
#align cont_mdiff_at_iff_target contMDiffAt_iff_target
theorem smoothAt_iff_target {x : M} :
SmoothAt I I' f x ↔ ContinuousAt f x ∧ SmoothAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x :=
contMDiffAt_iff_target
#align smooth_at_iff_target smoothAt_iff_target
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' M') (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm)
((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (e.extend I x) :=
(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp I I' n).liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx he' hy
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_of_mem_maximal_atlas contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas
/-- An alternative formulation of `contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas`
if the set if `s` lies in `e.source`. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_image {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s)
(e.extend I x) := by
rw [contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hx hy, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => contDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq I hs hx]
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_image contMDiffWithinAt_iff_image
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ y) hx hy
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_of_mem_source contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source' {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source))
(extChartAt I x x') := by
refine (contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans ?_
rw [← extChartAt_source I] at hx
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
rw [and_congr_right_iff]
set e := extChartAt I x; set e' := extChartAt I' (f x)
refine fun hc => contDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
rw [← e.image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' I hx, ←
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' I hx, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' _ hy)
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_of_mem_source' contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source'
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x' ↔
ContinuousAt f x' ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') :=
(contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans <| by
rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
#align cont_mdiff_at_iff_of_mem_source contMDiffAt_iff_of_mem_source
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source {x : M} {y : M'}
(hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContMDiffWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt]
rw [(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp I I' n).liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas I' y) hy,
and_congr_right]
intro hf
simp_rw [StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target]
simp_rw [((chartAt H' y).continuousAt hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
simp_rw [(continuousAt_extChartAt' I' hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rfl
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_target_of_mem_source contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_target_of_mem_source {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) x := by
rw [ContMDiffAt, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source hy, continuousWithinAt_univ,
ContMDiffAt]
#align cont_mdiff_at_iff_target_of_mem_source contMDiffAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hx : x ∈ e.source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) ((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
(e.extend I x) := by
have h2x := hx; rw [← e.extend_source I] at h2x
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt,
(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp I I' n).liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source he hx,
StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source,
e.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff, contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source,
ContDiffWithinAtProp, Function.comp, e.left_inv hx, (e.extend I).left_inv h2x]
rfl
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_source_of_mem_maximal_atlas contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x' ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I x) hx'
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_source_of_mem_source contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_source_of_mem_source {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x' ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I) (extChartAt I x x') := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffAt, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source hx', preimage_univ, univ_inter]
#align cont_mdiff_at_iff_source_of_mem_source contMDiffAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
theorem contMDiffOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
ContMDiffOn I I' n f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, ContDiffOn, Set.forall_mem_image, ← forall_and, ContMDiffOn]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx => contMDiffWithinAt_iff_image he he' hs (hs hx) (h2s hx)
#align cont_mdiff_on_iff_of_mem_maximal_atlas contMDiffOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas
theorem contMDiffOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
ContMDiffOn I I' n f s ↔
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) :=
(contMDiffOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hs h2s).trans <| and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦
(e.continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff _ _ hs h2s).1 h.continuousOn
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem contMDiffOn_iff_of_subset_source {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffOn I I' n f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) :=
contMDiffOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I x) (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I' y) hs
h2s
#align cont_mdiff_on_iff_of_subset_source contMDiffOn_iff_of_subset_source
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem contMDiffOn_iff_of_subset_source' {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (extChartAt I x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (extChartAt I' y).source) :
ContMDiffOn I I' n f s ↔
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) := by
rw [extChartAt_source] at hs h2s
exact contMDiffOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (chart_mem_maximalAtlas I x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas I' y) hs h2s
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart. -/
theorem contMDiffOn_iff :
ContMDiffOn I I' n f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun x hx => (h x hx).1, fun x y z hz => ?_⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hz
let w := (extChartAt I x).symm z
have : w ∈ s := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
specialize h w this
have w1 : w ∈ (chartAt H x).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
have w2 : f w ∈ (chartAt H' y).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
convert ((contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source w1 w2).mp h).2.mono _
· simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
· mfld_set_tac
· rintro ⟨hcont, hdiff⟩ x hx
refine (contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp I I' n).liftPropWithinAt_iff.mpr ?_
refine ⟨hcont x hx, ?_⟩
dsimp [ContDiffWithinAtProp]
convert hdiff x (f x) (extChartAt I x x) (by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]) using 1
mfld_set_tac
#align cont_mdiff_on_iff contMDiffOn_iff
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart in the target. -/
theorem contMDiffOn_iff_target :
ContMDiffOn I I' n f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ y : M',
ContMDiffOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
simp only [contMDiffOn_iff, ModelWithCorners.source_eq, chartAt_self_eq,
PartialHomeomorph.refl_partialEquiv, PartialEquiv.refl_trans, extChartAt,
PartialHomeomorph.extend, Set.preimage_univ, Set.inter_univ, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
constructor
· refine fun h' y => ⟨?_, fun x _ => h' x y⟩
have h'' : ContinuousOn _ univ := (ModelWithCorners.continuous I').continuousOn
convert (h''.comp' (chartAt H' y).continuousOn_toFun).comp' h
simp
· exact fun h' x y => (h' y).2 x 0
#align cont_mdiff_on_iff_target contMDiffOn_iff_target
theorem smoothOn_iff :
SmoothOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) :=
contMDiffOn_iff
#align smooth_on_iff smoothOn_iff
theorem smoothOn_iff_target :
SmoothOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ y : M', SmoothOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) :=
contMDiffOn_iff_target
#align smooth_on_iff_target smoothOn_iff_target
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart. -/
theorem contMDiff_iff :
ContMDiff I I' n f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
simp [← contMDiffOn_univ, contMDiffOn_iff, continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
#align cont_mdiff_iff contMDiff_iff
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart in the
target. -/
theorem contMDiff_iff_target :
ContMDiff I I' n f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ y : M',
ContMDiffOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
rw [← contMDiffOn_univ, contMDiffOn_iff_target]
simp [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
#align cont_mdiff_iff_target contMDiff_iff_target
theorem smooth_iff :
Smooth I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) :=
contMDiff_iff
#align smooth_iff smooth_iff
theorem smooth_iff_target :
Smooth I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ y : M', SmoothOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) :=
contMDiff_iff_target
#align smooth_iff_target smooth_iff_target
/-! ### Deducing smoothness from smoothness one step beyond -/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.of_succ {n : ℕ} (h : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n.succ f s x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x :=
h.of_le (WithTop.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_succ n))
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.of_succ ContMDiffWithinAt.of_succ
theorem ContMDiffAt.of_succ {n : ℕ} (h : ContMDiffAt I I' n.succ f x) : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
ContMDiffWithinAt.of_succ h
#align cont_mdiff_at.of_succ ContMDiffAt.of_succ
theorem ContMDiffOn.of_succ {n : ℕ} (h : ContMDiffOn I I' n.succ f s) : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).of_succ
#align cont_mdiff_on.of_succ ContMDiffOn.of_succ
theorem ContMDiff.of_succ {n : ℕ} (h : ContMDiff I I' n.succ f) : ContMDiff I I' n f := fun x =>
(h x).of_succ
#align cont_mdiff.of_succ ContMDiff.of_succ
/-! ### Deducing continuity from smoothness -/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf.1
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.continuous_within_at ContMDiffWithinAt.continuousWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffAt.continuousAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(continuousWithinAt_univ _ _).1 <| ContMDiffWithinAt.continuousWithinAt hf
#align cont_mdiff_at.continuous_at ContMDiffAt.continuousAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.continuousOn (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) : ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).continuousWithinAt
#align cont_mdiff_on.continuous_on ContMDiffOn.continuousOn
theorem ContMDiff.continuous (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (hf x).continuousAt
#align cont_mdiff.continuous ContMDiff.continuous
/-! ### `C^∞` smoothness -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_top :
SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x :=
⟨fun h n => ⟨h.1, contDiffWithinAt_top.1 h.2 n⟩, fun H =>
⟨(H 0).1, contDiffWithinAt_top.2 fun n => (H n).2⟩⟩
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_top contMDiffWithinAt_top
theorem contMDiffAt_top : SmoothAt I I' f x ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
contMDiffWithinAt_top
#align cont_mdiff_at_top contMDiffAt_top
theorem contMDiffOn_top : SmoothOn I I' f s ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContMDiffOn I I' n f s :=
⟨fun h _ => h.of_le le_top, fun h x hx => contMDiffWithinAt_top.2 fun n => h n x hx⟩
#align cont_mdiff_on_top contMDiffOn_top
theorem contMDiff_top : Smooth I I' f ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContMDiff I I' n f :=
⟨fun h _ => h.of_le le_top, fun h x => contMDiffWithinAt_top.2 fun n => h n x⟩
#align cont_mdiff_top contMDiff_top
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_nat :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → ContMDiffWithinAt I I' m f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h m hm => h.of_le hm, fun h => ?_⟩
cases' n with n
· exact contMDiffWithinAt_top.2 fun n => h n le_top
· exact h n le_rfl
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_nat contMDiffWithinAt_iff_nat
/-! ### Restriction to a smaller set -/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x) (hts : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f t x :=
StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_mono_of_mem
(contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem I I' n) hf hts
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.mono_of_mem ContMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mono (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x) (hts : t ⊆ s) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f t x :=
hf.mono_of_mem <| mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hts
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.mono ContMDiffWithinAt.mono
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔ ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_of_mem <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin, fun h =>
h.mono_of_mem <| hst.symm ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin⟩
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_congr_nhds contMDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_insert_self :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f (insert x s) x ↔ ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x := by
simp only [contMDiffWithinAt_iff, continuousWithinAt_insert_self]
refine Iff.rfl.and <| (contDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_).trans contDiffWithinAt_insert_self
simp only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin I, nhdsWithin_insert, Filter.map_sup, Filter.map_pure]
alias ⟨ContMDiffWithinAt.of_insert, _⟩ := contMDiffWithinAt_insert_self
-- TODO: use `alias` again once it can make protected theorems
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.insert (h : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f (insert x s) x :=
contMDiffWithinAt_insert_self.2 h
theorem ContMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x :=
ContMDiffWithinAt.mono hf (subset_univ _)
#align cont_mdiff_at.cont_mdiff_within_at ContMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt
theorem SmoothAt.smoothWithinAt (hf : SmoothAt I I' f x) : SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x :=
ContMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt hf
#align smooth_at.smooth_within_at SmoothAt.smoothWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.mono (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hts : t ⊆ s) : ContMDiffOn I I' n f t :=
fun x hx => (hf x (hts hx)).mono hts
#align cont_mdiff_on.mono ContMDiffOn.mono
theorem ContMDiff.contMDiffOn (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s := fun x _ =>
(hf x).contMDiffWithinAt
#align cont_mdiff.cont_mdiff_on ContMDiff.contMDiffOn
theorem Smooth.smoothOn (hf : Smooth I I' f) : SmoothOn I I' f s :=
ContMDiff.contMDiffOn hf
#align smooth.smooth_on Smooth.smoothOn
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp I I' n).liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_inter' contMDiffWithinAt_inter'
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp I I' n).liftPropWithinAt_inter ht
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_inter contMDiffWithinAt_inter
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.contMDiffAt (h : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x) (ht : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp I I' n).liftPropAt_of_liftPropWithinAt h ht
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.cont_mdiff_at ContMDiffWithinAt.contMDiffAt
theorem SmoothWithinAt.smoothAt (h : SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x) (ht : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
SmoothAt I I' f x :=
ContMDiffWithinAt.contMDiffAt h ht
#align smooth_within_at.smooth_at SmoothWithinAt.smoothAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.contMDiffAt (h : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).contMDiffAt hx
#align cont_mdiff_on.cont_mdiff_at ContMDiffOn.contMDiffAt
theorem SmoothOn.smoothAt (h : SmoothOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : SmoothAt I I' f x :=
h.contMDiffAt hx
#align smooth_on.smooth_at SmoothOn.smoothAt
theorem contMDiffOn_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M) (hs : s ⊆ e.source) :
ContMDiffOn I I' n f s ↔
ContMDiffOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffOn, Set.forall_mem_image]
refine forall₂_congr fun x hx => ?_
rw [contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas he (hs hx)]
apply contMDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq,
e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq I hs (hs hx)]
#align cont_mdiff_on_iff_source_of_mem_maximal_atlas contMDiffOn_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
-- Porting note: didn't compile; fixed by golfing the proof and moving parts to lemmas
/-- A function is `C^n` within a set at a point, for `n : ℕ`, if and only if it is `C^n` on
a neighborhood of this point. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_contMDiffOn_nhds {n : ℕ} :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ContMDiffOn I I' n f u := by
-- WLOG, `x ∈ s`, otherwise we add `x` to `s`
wlog hxs : x ∈ s generalizing s
· rw [← contMDiffWithinAt_insert_self, this (mem_insert _ _), insert_idem]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hxs]
-- The `←` implication is trivial
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨u, hmem, hu⟩ ↦ (hu _ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hxs hmem)).mono_of_mem hmem⟩
-- The property is true in charts. Let `v` be a good neighborhood in the chart where the function
-- is smooth.
rcases (contMDiffWithinAt_iff'.1 h).2.contDiffOn le_rfl with ⟨v, hmem, hsub, hv⟩
have hxs' : extChartAt I x x ∈ (extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) :=
⟨(extChartAt I x).map_source (mem_extChartAt_source _ _), by rwa [extChartAt_to_inv], by
rw [extChartAt_to_inv]; apply mem_extChartAt_source⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hxs'] at hmem hsub
-- Then `(extChartAt I x).symm '' v` is the neighborhood we are looking for.
refine ⟨(extChartAt I x).symm '' v, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin I,
h.1.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range I I']
exact image_mem_map hmem
· have hv₁ : (extChartAt I x).symm '' v ⊆ (extChartAt I x).source :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun y hy ↦ (extChartAt I x).map_target (hsub hy).1
have hv₂ : MapsTo f ((extChartAt I x).symm '' v) (extChartAt I' (f x)).source := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact (hsub hy).2.2
rwa [contMDiffOn_iff_of_subset_source' hv₁ hv₂, PartialEquiv.image_symm_image_of_subset_target]
exact hsub.trans inter_subset_left
#align cont_mdiff_within_at_iff_cont_mdiff_on_nhds contMDiffWithinAt_iff_contMDiffOn_nhds
/-- A function is `C^n` at a point, for `n : ℕ`, if and only if it is `C^n` on
a neighborhood of this point. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ContMDiff/Defs.lean | 842 | 844 | theorem contMDiffAt_iff_contMDiffOn_nhds {n : ℕ} :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ContMDiffOn I I' n f u := by |
simp [← contMDiffWithinAt_univ, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_contMDiffOn_nhds, nhdsWithin_univ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
#align_import data.matrix.block from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c060baa79af5ca092c54b8bf04f0f10592f59489"
/-!
# Block Matrices
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.fromBlocks`: build a block matrix out of 4 blocks
* `Matrix.toBlocks₁₁`, `Matrix.toBlocks₁₂`, `Matrix.toBlocks₂₁`, `Matrix.toBlocks₂₂`:
extract each of the four blocks from `Matrix.fromBlocks`.
* `Matrix.blockDiagonal`: block diagonal of equally sized blocks. On square blocks, this is a
ring homomorphisms, `Matrix.blockDiagonalRingHom`.
* `Matrix.blockDiag`: extract the blocks from the diagonal of a block diagonal matrix.
* `Matrix.blockDiagonal'`: block diagonal of unequally sized blocks. On square blocks, this is a
ring homomorphisms, `Matrix.blockDiagonal'RingHom`.
* `Matrix.blockDiag'`: extract the blocks from the diagonal of a block diagonal matrix.
-/
variable {l m n o p q : Type*} {m' n' p' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
theorem dotProduct_block [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [Mul α] [AddCommMonoid α] (v w : Sum m n → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = v ∘ Sum.inl ⬝ᵥ w ∘ Sum.inl + v ∘ Sum.inr ⬝ᵥ w ∘ Sum.inr :=
Fintype.sum_sum_type _
#align matrix.dot_product_block Matrix.dotProduct_block
section BlockMatrices
/-- We can form a single large matrix by flattening smaller 'block' matrices of compatible
dimensions. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
def fromBlocks (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) :
Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α :=
of <| Sum.elim (fun i => Sum.elim (A i) (B i)) fun i => Sum.elim (C i) (D i)
#align matrix.from_blocks Matrix.fromBlocks
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₁₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : n) (j : l) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j) = A i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₁₁ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₁₁
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₁₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : n) (j : m) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inr j) = B i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₁₂ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₁₂
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₂₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : o) (j : l) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inl j) = C i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₂₁ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₂₁
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_apply₂₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (i : o) (j : m) : fromBlocks A B C D (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j) = D i j :=
rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_apply₂₂ Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₂₂
/-- Given a matrix whose row and column indexes are sum types, we can extract the corresponding
"top left" submatrix. -/
def toBlocks₁₁ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix n l α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₁₁ Matrix.toBlocks₁₁
/-- Given a matrix whose row and column indexes are sum types, we can extract the corresponding
"top right" submatrix. -/
def toBlocks₁₂ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix n m α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inr j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₁₂ Matrix.toBlocks₁₂
/-- Given a matrix whose row and column indexes are sum types, we can extract the corresponding
"bottom left" submatrix. -/
def toBlocks₂₁ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix o l α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inl j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₂₁ Matrix.toBlocks₂₁
/-- Given a matrix whose row and column indexes are sum types, we can extract the corresponding
"bottom right" submatrix. -/
def toBlocks₂₂ (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Matrix o m α :=
of fun i j => M (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j)
#align matrix.to_blocks₂₂ Matrix.toBlocks₂₂
theorem fromBlocks_toBlocks (M : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) :
fromBlocks M.toBlocks₁₁ M.toBlocks₁₂ M.toBlocks₂₁ M.toBlocks₂₂ = M := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_to_blocks Matrix.fromBlocks_toBlocks
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₁₁ = A :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₁₁ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₁₂ = B :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₁₂ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₂
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₁ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₂₁ = C :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₂₁ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₁
@[simp]
theorem toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂ (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D).toBlocks₂₂ = D :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_blocks_from_blocks₂₂ Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂
/-- Two block matrices are equal if their blocks are equal. -/
theorem ext_iff_blocks {A B : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α} :
A = B ↔
A.toBlocks₁₁ = B.toBlocks₁₁ ∧
A.toBlocks₁₂ = B.toBlocks₁₂ ∧ A.toBlocks₂₁ = B.toBlocks₂₁ ∧ A.toBlocks₂₂ = B.toBlocks₂₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁₁, h₁₂, h₂₁, h₂₂⟩ => by
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks A, ← fromBlocks_toBlocks B, h₁₁, h₁₂, h₂₁, h₂₂]⟩
#align matrix.ext_iff_blocks Matrix.ext_iff_blocks
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_inj {A : Matrix n l α} {B : Matrix n m α} {C : Matrix o l α} {D : Matrix o m α}
{A' : Matrix n l α} {B' : Matrix n m α} {C' : Matrix o l α} {D' : Matrix o m α} :
fromBlocks A B C D = fromBlocks A' B' C' D' ↔ A = A' ∧ B = B' ∧ C = C' ∧ D = D' :=
ext_iff_blocks
#align matrix.from_blocks_inj Matrix.fromBlocks_inj
theorem fromBlocks_map (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α)
(f : α → β) : (fromBlocks A B C D).map f =
fromBlocks (A.map f) (B.map f) (C.map f) (D.map f) := by
ext i j; rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_map Matrix.fromBlocks_map
theorem fromBlocks_transpose (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D)ᵀ = fromBlocks Aᵀ Cᵀ Bᵀ Dᵀ := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_transpose Matrix.fromBlocks_transpose
theorem fromBlocks_conjTranspose [Star α] (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : (fromBlocks A B C D)ᴴ = fromBlocks Aᴴ Cᴴ Bᴴ Dᴴ := by
simp only [conjTranspose, fromBlocks_transpose, fromBlocks_map]
#align matrix.from_blocks_conj_transpose Matrix.fromBlocks_conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_left (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (f : p → Sum l m) :
(fromBlocks A B C D).submatrix Sum.swap f = (fromBlocks C D A B).submatrix id f := by
ext i j
cases i <;> dsimp <;> cases f j <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_submatrix_sum_swap_left Matrix.fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_left
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_right (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (f : p → Sum n o) :
(fromBlocks A B C D).submatrix f Sum.swap = (fromBlocks B A D C).submatrix f id := by
ext i j
cases j <;> dsimp <;> cases f i <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_submatrix_sum_swap_right Matrix.fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_right
theorem fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap {l m n o α : Type*} (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) :
(fromBlocks A B C D).submatrix Sum.swap Sum.swap = fromBlocks D C B A := by simp
#align matrix.from_blocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap Matrix.fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap
/-- A 2x2 block matrix is block diagonal if the blocks outside of the diagonal vanish -/
def IsTwoBlockDiagonal [Zero α] (A : Matrix (Sum n o) (Sum l m) α) : Prop :=
toBlocks₁₂ A = 0 ∧ toBlocks₂₁ A = 0
#align matrix.is_two_block_diagonal Matrix.IsTwoBlockDiagonal
/-- Let `p` pick out certain rows and `q` pick out certain columns of a matrix `M`. Then
`toBlock M p q` is the corresponding block matrix. -/
def toBlock (M : Matrix m n α) (p : m → Prop) (q : n → Prop) : Matrix { a // p a } { a // q a } α :=
M.submatrix (↑) (↑)
#align matrix.to_block Matrix.toBlock
@[simp]
theorem toBlock_apply (M : Matrix m n α) (p : m → Prop) (q : n → Prop) (i : { a // p a })
(j : { a // q a }) : toBlock M p q i j = M ↑i ↑j :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_block_apply Matrix.toBlock_apply
/-- Let `p` pick out certain rows and columns of a square matrix `M`. Then
`toSquareBlockProp M p` is the corresponding block matrix. -/
def toSquareBlockProp (M : Matrix m m α) (p : m → Prop) : Matrix { a // p a } { a // p a } α :=
toBlock M _ _
#align matrix.to_square_block_prop Matrix.toSquareBlockProp
theorem toSquareBlockProp_def (M : Matrix m m α) (p : m → Prop) :
-- Porting note: added missing `of`
toSquareBlockProp M p = of (fun i j : { a // p a } => M ↑i ↑j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_square_block_prop_def Matrix.toSquareBlockProp_def
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks. Then
`toSquareBlock M b k` is the block `k` matrix. -/
def toSquareBlock (M : Matrix m m α) (b : m → β) (k : β) :
Matrix { a // b a = k } { a // b a = k } α :=
toSquareBlockProp M _
#align matrix.to_square_block Matrix.toSquareBlock
theorem toSquareBlock_def (M : Matrix m m α) (b : m → β) (k : β) :
-- Porting note: added missing `of`
toSquareBlock M b k = of (fun i j : { a // b a = k } => M ↑i ↑j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_square_block_def Matrix.toSquareBlock_def
theorem fromBlocks_smul [SMul R α] (x : R) (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) : x • fromBlocks A B C D = fromBlocks (x • A) (x • B) (x • C) (x • D) := by
ext i j; rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_smul Matrix.fromBlocks_smul
theorem fromBlocks_neg [Neg R] (A : Matrix n l R) (B : Matrix n m R) (C : Matrix o l R)
(D : Matrix o m R) : -fromBlocks A B C D = fromBlocks (-A) (-B) (-C) (-D) := by
ext i j
cases i <;> cases j <;> simp [fromBlocks]
#align matrix.from_blocks_neg Matrix.fromBlocks_neg
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_zero [Zero α] : fromBlocks (0 : Matrix n l α) 0 0 (0 : Matrix o m α) = 0 := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero Matrix.fromBlocks_zero
theorem fromBlocks_add [Add α] (A : Matrix n l α) (B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α)
(D : Matrix o m α) (A' : Matrix n l α) (B' : Matrix n m α) (C' : Matrix o l α)
(D' : Matrix o m α) : fromBlocks A B C D + fromBlocks A' B' C' D' =
fromBlocks (A + A') (B + B') (C + C') (D + D') := by
ext i j; rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align matrix.from_blocks_add Matrix.fromBlocks_add
theorem fromBlocks_multiply [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) (A' : Matrix l p α) (B' : Matrix l q α)
(C' : Matrix m p α) (D' : Matrix m q α) :
fromBlocks A B C D * fromBlocks A' B' C' D' =
fromBlocks (A * A' + B * C') (A * B' + B * D') (C * A' + D * C') (C * B' + D * D') := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [fromBlocks, mul_apply, of_apply,
Sum.elim_inr, Fintype.sum_sum_type, Sum.elim_inl, add_apply]
#align matrix.from_blocks_multiply Matrix.fromBlocks_multiply
theorem fromBlocks_mulVec [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) (x : Sum l m → α) :
(fromBlocks A B C D) *ᵥ x =
Sum.elim (A *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inl) + B *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inr))
(C *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inl) + D *ᵥ (x ∘ Sum.inr)) := by
ext i
cases i <;> simp [mulVec, dotProduct]
#align matrix.from_blocks_mul_vec Matrix.fromBlocks_mulVec
theorem vecMul_fromBlocks [Fintype n] [Fintype o] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (A : Matrix n l α)
(B : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix o l α) (D : Matrix o m α) (x : Sum n o → α) :
x ᵥ* fromBlocks A B C D =
Sum.elim ((x ∘ Sum.inl) ᵥ* A + (x ∘ Sum.inr) ᵥ* C)
((x ∘ Sum.inl) ᵥ* B + (x ∘ Sum.inr) ᵥ* D) := by
ext i
cases i <;> simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
#align matrix.vec_mul_from_blocks Matrix.vecMul_fromBlocks
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m]
section Zero
variable [Zero α]
theorem toBlock_diagonal_self (d : m → α) (p : m → Prop) :
Matrix.toBlock (diagonal d) p p = diagonal fun i : Subtype p => d ↑i := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j
· simp [h]
· simp [One.one, h, Subtype.val_injective.ne h]
#align matrix.to_block_diagonal_self Matrix.toBlock_diagonal_self
theorem toBlock_diagonal_disjoint (d : m → α) {p q : m → Prop} (hpq : Disjoint p q) :
Matrix.toBlock (diagonal d) p q = 0 := by
ext ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
have : i ≠ j := fun heq => hpq.le_bot i ⟨hi, heq.symm ▸ hj⟩
simp [diagonal_apply_ne d this]
#align matrix.to_block_diagonal_disjoint Matrix.toBlock_diagonal_disjoint
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_diagonal (d₁ : l → α) (d₂ : m → α) :
fromBlocks (diagonal d₁) 0 0 (diagonal d₂) = diagonal (Sum.elim d₁ d₂) := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [diagonal]
#align matrix.from_blocks_diagonal Matrix.fromBlocks_diagonal
@[simp]
lemma toBlocks₁₁_diagonal (v : l ⊕ m → α) :
toBlocks₁₁ (diagonal v) = diagonal (fun i => v (Sum.inl i)) := by
unfold toBlocks₁₁
funext i j
simp only [ne_eq, Sum.inl.injEq, of_apply, diagonal_apply]
@[simp]
lemma toBlocks₂₂_diagonal (v : l ⊕ m → α) :
toBlocks₂₂ (diagonal v) = diagonal (fun i => v (Sum.inr i)) := by
unfold toBlocks₂₂
funext i j
simp only [ne_eq, Sum.inr.injEq, of_apply, diagonal_apply]
@[simp]
lemma toBlocks₁₂_diagonal (v : l ⊕ m → α) : toBlocks₁₂ (diagonal v) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toBlocks₂₁_diagonal (v : l ⊕ m → α) : toBlocks₂₁ (diagonal v) = 0 := rfl
end Zero
section HasZeroHasOne
variable [Zero α] [One α]
@[simp]
theorem fromBlocks_one : fromBlocks (1 : Matrix l l α) 0 0 (1 : Matrix m m α) = 1 := by
ext i j
rcases i with ⟨⟩ <;> rcases j with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [one_apply]
#align matrix.from_blocks_one Matrix.fromBlocks_one
@[simp]
theorem toBlock_one_self (p : m → Prop) : Matrix.toBlock (1 : Matrix m m α) p p = 1 :=
toBlock_diagonal_self _ p
#align matrix.to_block_one_self Matrix.toBlock_one_self
theorem toBlock_one_disjoint {p q : m → Prop} (hpq : Disjoint p q) :
Matrix.toBlock (1 : Matrix m m α) p q = 0 :=
toBlock_diagonal_disjoint _ hpq
#align matrix.to_block_one_disjoint Matrix.toBlock_one_disjoint
end HasZeroHasOne
end BlockMatrices
section BlockDiagonal
variable [DecidableEq o]
section Zero
variable [Zero α] [Zero β]
/-- `Matrix.blockDiagonal M` turns a homogenously-indexed collection of matrices
`M : o → Matrix m n α'` into an `m × o`-by-`n × o` block matrix which has the entries of `M` along
the diagonal and zero elsewhere.
See also `Matrix.blockDiagonal'` if the matrices may not have the same size everywhere.
-/
def blockDiagonal (M : o → Matrix m n α) : Matrix (m × o) (n × o) α :=
of <| (fun ⟨i, k⟩ ⟨j, k'⟩ => if k = k' then M k i j else 0 : m × o → n × o → α)
#align matrix.block_diagonal Matrix.blockDiagonal
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `blockDiagonal`, see mathlib4#3024
theorem blockDiagonal_apply' (M : o → Matrix m n α) (i k j k') :
blockDiagonal M ⟨i, k⟩ ⟨j, k'⟩ = if k = k' then M k i j else 0 :=
rfl
#align matrix.block_diagonal_apply' Matrix.blockDiagonal_apply'
theorem blockDiagonal_apply (M : o → Matrix m n α) (ik jk) :
blockDiagonal M ik jk = if ik.2 = jk.2 then M ik.2 ik.1 jk.1 else 0 := by
cases ik
cases jk
rfl
#align matrix.block_diagonal_apply Matrix.blockDiagonal_apply
@[simp]
theorem blockDiagonal_apply_eq (M : o → Matrix m n α) (i j k) :
blockDiagonal M (i, k) (j, k) = M k i j :=
if_pos rfl
#align matrix.block_diagonal_apply_eq Matrix.blockDiagonal_apply_eq
theorem blockDiagonal_apply_ne (M : o → Matrix m n α) (i j) {k k'} (h : k ≠ k') :
blockDiagonal M (i, k) (j, k') = 0 :=
if_neg h
#align matrix.block_diagonal_apply_ne Matrix.blockDiagonal_apply_ne
theorem blockDiagonal_map (M : o → Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0) :
(blockDiagonal M).map f = blockDiagonal fun k => (M k).map f := by
ext
simp only [map_apply, blockDiagonal_apply, eq_comm]
rw [apply_ite f, hf]
#align matrix.block_diagonal_map Matrix.blockDiagonal_map
@[simp]
theorem blockDiagonal_transpose (M : o → Matrix m n α) :
(blockDiagonal M)ᵀ = blockDiagonal fun k => (M k)ᵀ := by
ext
simp only [transpose_apply, blockDiagonal_apply, eq_comm]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
· rfl
#align matrix.block_diagonal_transpose Matrix.blockDiagonal_transpose
@[simp]
theorem blockDiagonal_conjTranspose {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] [StarAddMonoid α]
(M : o → Matrix m n α) : (blockDiagonal M)ᴴ = blockDiagonal fun k => (M k)ᴴ := by
simp only [conjTranspose, blockDiagonal_transpose]
rw [blockDiagonal_map _ star (star_zero α)]
#align matrix.block_diagonal_conj_transpose Matrix.blockDiagonal_conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem blockDiagonal_zero : blockDiagonal (0 : o → Matrix m n α) = 0 := by
ext
simp [blockDiagonal_apply]
#align matrix.block_diagonal_zero Matrix.blockDiagonal_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Block.lean | 422 | 427 | theorem blockDiagonal_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (d : o → m → α) :
(blockDiagonal fun k => diagonal (d k)) = diagonal fun ik => d ik.2 ik.1 := by |
ext ⟨i, k⟩ ⟨j, k'⟩
simp only [blockDiagonal_apply, diagonal_apply, Prod.mk.inj_iff, ← ite_and]
congr 1
rw [and_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Balanced
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.WellPowered
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Opposite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import category_theory.generator from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f187f1074fa1857c94589cc653c786cadc4c35ff"
/-!
# Separating and detecting sets
There are several non-equivalent notions of a generator of a category. Here, we consider two of
them:
* We say that `𝒢` is a separating set if the functors `C(G, -)` for `G ∈ 𝒢` are collectively
faithful, i.e., if `h ≫ f = h ≫ g` for all `h` with domain in `𝒢` implies `f = g`.
* We say that `𝒢` is a detecting set if the functors `C(G, -)` collectively reflect isomorphisms,
i.e., if any `h` with domain in `𝒢` uniquely factors through `f`, then `f` is an isomorphism.
There are, of course, also the dual notions of coseparating and codetecting sets.
## Main results
We
* define predicates `IsSeparating`, `IsCoseparating`, `IsDetecting` and `IsCodetecting` on
sets of objects;
* show that separating and coseparating are dual notions;
* show that detecting and codetecting are dual notions;
* show that if `C` has equalizers, then detecting implies separating;
* show that if `C` has coequalizers, then codetecting implies separating;
* show that if `C` is balanced, then separating implies detecting and coseparating implies
codetecting;
* show that `∅` is separating if and only if `∅` is coseparating if and only if `C` is thin;
* show that `∅` is detecting if and only if `∅` is codetecting if and only if `C` is a groupoid;
* define predicates `IsSeparator`, `IsCoseparator`, `IsDetector` and `IsCodetector` as the
singleton counterparts to the definitions for sets above and restate the above results in this
situation;
* show that `G` is a separator if and only if `coyoneda.obj (op G)` is faithful (and the dual);
* show that `G` is a detector if and only if `coyoneda.obj (op G)` reflects isomorphisms (and the
dual).
## Future work
* We currently don't have any examples yet.
* We will want typeclasses `HasSeparator C` and similar.
-/
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a separating set if the functors `C(G, -)` for `G ∈ 𝒢` are collectively
faithful, i.e., if `h ≫ f = h ≫ g` for all `h` with domain in `𝒢` implies `f = g`. -/
def IsSeparating (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f g : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : G ⟶ X), h ≫ f = h ≫ g) → f = g
#align category_theory.is_separating CategoryTheory.IsSeparating
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a coseparating set if the functors `C(-, G)` for `G ∈ 𝒢` are collectively
faithful, i.e., if `f ≫ h = g ≫ h` for all `h` with codomain in `𝒢` implies `f = g`. -/
def IsCoseparating (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f g : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : Y ⟶ G), f ≫ h = g ≫ h) → f = g
#align category_theory.is_coseparating CategoryTheory.IsCoseparating
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a detecting set if the functors `C(G, -)` collectively reflect isomorphisms,
i.e., if any `h` with domain in `𝒢` uniquely factors through `f`, then `f` is an isomorphism. -/
def IsDetecting (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : G ⟶ Y), ∃! h' : G ⟶ X, h' ≫ f = h) → IsIso f
#align category_theory.is_detecting CategoryTheory.IsDetecting
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a codetecting set if the functors `C(-, G)` collectively reflect
isomorphisms, i.e., if any `h` with codomain in `G` uniquely factors through `f`, then `f` is
an isomorphism. -/
def IsCodetecting (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : X ⟶ G), ∃! h' : Y ⟶ G, f ≫ h' = h) → IsIso f
#align category_theory.is_codetecting CategoryTheory.IsCodetecting
section Dual
theorem isSeparating_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsSeparating 𝒢.op ↔ IsCoseparating 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_⟩
· refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op] using hfg _ (Set.mem_op.1 hG) _
· refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop] using hfg _ (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) _
#align category_theory.is_separating_op_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparating_op_iff
theorem isCoseparating_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsCoseparating 𝒢.op ↔ IsSeparating 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_⟩
· refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op] using hfg _ (Set.mem_op.1 hG) _
· refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop] using hfg _ (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) _
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_op_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_op_iff
theorem isCoseparating_unop_iff (𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ) : IsCoseparating 𝒢.unop ↔ IsSeparating 𝒢 := by
rw [← isSeparating_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_unop_iff
theorem isSeparating_unop_iff (𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ) : IsSeparating 𝒢.unop ↔ IsCoseparating 𝒢 := by
rw [← isCoseparating_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_separating_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparating_unop_iff
theorem isDetecting_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsDetecting 𝒢.op ↔ IsCodetecting 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_⟩
· refine (isIso_op_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (unop G) (Set.mem_op.1 hG) h.unop
exact
⟨t.op, Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (ht' _ (Quiver.Hom.op_inj hy))⟩
· refine (isIso_unop_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (op G) (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) h.op
refine ⟨t.unop, Quiver.Hom.op_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.op_inj (ht' _ ?_)⟩
exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simpa only using hy)
#align category_theory.is_detecting_op_iff CategoryTheory.isDetecting_op_iff
theorem isCodetecting_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsCodetecting 𝒢.op ↔ IsDetecting 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_⟩
· refine (isIso_op_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (unop G) (Set.mem_op.1 hG) h.unop
exact
⟨t.op, Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (ht' _ (Quiver.Hom.op_inj hy))⟩
· refine (isIso_unop_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (op G) (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) h.op
refine ⟨t.unop, Quiver.Hom.op_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.op_inj (ht' _ ?_)⟩
exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simpa only using hy)
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_op_iff CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_op_iff
theorem isDetecting_unop_iff (𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ) : IsDetecting 𝒢.unop ↔ IsCodetecting 𝒢 := by
rw [← isCodetecting_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_detecting_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isDetecting_unop_iff
theorem isCodetecting_unop_iff {𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ} : IsCodetecting 𝒢.unop ↔ IsDetecting 𝒢 := by
rw [← isDetecting_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_unop_iff
end Dual
theorem IsDetecting.isSeparating [HasEqualizers C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) :
IsSeparating 𝒢 := fun _ _ f g hfg =>
have : IsIso (equalizer.ι f g) := h𝒢 _ fun _ hG _ => equalizer.existsUnique _ (hfg _ hG _)
eq_of_epi_equalizer
#align category_theory.is_detecting.is_separating CategoryTheory.IsDetecting.isSeparating
section
theorem IsCodetecting.isCoseparating [HasCoequalizers C] {𝒢 : Set C} :
IsCodetecting 𝒢 → IsCoseparating 𝒢 := by
simpa only [← isSeparating_op_iff, ← isDetecting_op_iff] using IsDetecting.isSeparating
#align category_theory.is_codetecting.is_coseparating CategoryTheory.IsCodetecting.isCoseparating
end
theorem IsSeparating.isDetecting [Balanced C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) :
IsDetecting 𝒢 := by
intro X Y f hf
refine
(isIso_iff_mono_and_epi _).2 ⟨⟨fun g h hgh => h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG i => ?_⟩, ⟨fun g h hgh => ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨t, -, ht⟩ := hf G hG (i ≫ g ≫ f)
rw [ht (i ≫ g) (Category.assoc _ _ _), ht (i ≫ h) (hgh.symm ▸ Category.assoc _ _ _)]
· refine h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG i => ?_
obtain ⟨t, rfl, -⟩ := hf G hG i
rw [Category.assoc, hgh, Category.assoc]
#align category_theory.is_separating.is_detecting CategoryTheory.IsSeparating.isDetecting
section
attribute [local instance] balanced_opposite
theorem IsCoseparating.isCodetecting [Balanced C] {𝒢 : Set C} :
IsCoseparating 𝒢 → IsCodetecting 𝒢 := by
simpa only [← isDetecting_op_iff, ← isSeparating_op_iff] using IsSeparating.isDetecting
#align category_theory.is_coseparating.is_codetecting CategoryTheory.IsCoseparating.isCodetecting
end
theorem isDetecting_iff_isSeparating [HasEqualizers C] [Balanced C] (𝒢 : Set C) :
IsDetecting 𝒢 ↔ IsSeparating 𝒢 :=
⟨IsDetecting.isSeparating, IsSeparating.isDetecting⟩
#align category_theory.is_detecting_iff_is_separating CategoryTheory.isDetecting_iff_isSeparating
theorem isCodetecting_iff_isCoseparating [HasCoequalizers C] [Balanced C] {𝒢 : Set C} :
IsCodetecting 𝒢 ↔ IsCoseparating 𝒢 :=
⟨IsCodetecting.isCoseparating, IsCoseparating.isCodetecting⟩
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_iff_is_coseparating CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_iff_isCoseparating
section Mono
theorem IsSeparating.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsSeparating ℋ := fun _ _ _ _ hfg => h𝒢 _ _ fun _ hG _ => hfg _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_separating.mono CategoryTheory.IsSeparating.mono
theorem IsCoseparating.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsCoseparating 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsCoseparating ℋ := fun _ _ _ _ hfg => h𝒢 _ _ fun _ hG _ => hfg _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_coseparating.mono CategoryTheory.IsCoseparating.mono
theorem IsDetecting.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsDetecting ℋ := fun _ _ _ hf => h𝒢 _ fun _ hG _ => hf _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_detecting.mono CategoryTheory.IsDetecting.mono
theorem IsCodetecting.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsCodetecting 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsCodetecting ℋ := fun _ _ _ hf => h𝒢 _ fun _ hG _ => hf _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_codetecting.mono CategoryTheory.IsCodetecting.mono
end Mono
section Empty
theorem thin_of_isSeparating_empty (h : IsSeparating (∅ : Set C)) : Quiver.IsThin C := fun _ _ =>
⟨fun _ _ => h _ _ fun _ => False.elim⟩
#align category_theory.thin_of_is_separating_empty CategoryTheory.thin_of_isSeparating_empty
theorem isSeparating_empty_of_thin [Quiver.IsThin C] : IsSeparating (∅ : Set C) :=
fun _ _ _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align category_theory.is_separating_empty_of_thin CategoryTheory.isSeparating_empty_of_thin
theorem thin_of_isCoseparating_empty (h : IsCoseparating (∅ : Set C)) : Quiver.IsThin C :=
fun _ _ => ⟨fun _ _ => h _ _ fun _ => False.elim⟩
#align category_theory.thin_of_is_coseparating_empty CategoryTheory.thin_of_isCoseparating_empty
theorem isCoseparating_empty_of_thin [Quiver.IsThin C] : IsCoseparating (∅ : Set C) :=
fun _ _ _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_empty_of_thin CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_empty_of_thin
theorem groupoid_of_isDetecting_empty (h : IsDetecting (∅ : Set C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsIso f :=
h _ fun _ => False.elim
#align category_theory.groupoid_of_is_detecting_empty CategoryTheory.groupoid_of_isDetecting_empty
theorem isDetecting_empty_of_groupoid [∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), IsIso f] :
IsDetecting (∅ : Set C) := fun _ _ _ _ => inferInstance
#align category_theory.is_detecting_empty_of_groupoid CategoryTheory.isDetecting_empty_of_groupoid
theorem groupoid_of_isCodetecting_empty (h : IsCodetecting (∅ : Set C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsIso f :=
h _ fun _ => False.elim
#align category_theory.groupoid_of_is_codetecting_empty CategoryTheory.groupoid_of_isCodetecting_empty
theorem isCodetecting_empty_of_groupoid [∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), IsIso f] :
IsCodetecting (∅ : Set C) := fun _ _ _ _ => inferInstance
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_empty_of_groupoid CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_empty_of_groupoid
end Empty
theorem isSeparating_iff_epi (𝒢 : Set C)
[∀ A : C, HasCoproduct fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, (G : C) ⟶ A => (f.1 : C)] :
IsSeparating 𝒢 ↔ ∀ A : C, Epi (Sigma.desc (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => (G : C) ⟶ A)) := by
refine ⟨fun h A => ⟨fun u v huv => h _ _ fun G hG f => ?_⟩, fun h X Y f g hh => ?_⟩
· simpa using Sigma.ι (fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, (G : C) ⟶ A => (f.1 : C)) ⟨⟨G, hG⟩, f⟩ ≫= huv
· haveI := h X
refine
(cancel_epi (Sigma.desc (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => (G : C) ⟶ X))).1 (colimit.hom_ext fun j => ?_)
simpa using hh j.as.1.1 j.as.1.2 j.as.2
#align category_theory.is_separating_iff_epi CategoryTheory.isSeparating_iff_epi
theorem isCoseparating_iff_mono (𝒢 : Set C)
[∀ A : C, HasProduct fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C) => (f.1 : C)] :
IsCoseparating 𝒢 ↔ ∀ A : C, Mono (Pi.lift (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => A ⟶ (G : C))) := by
refine ⟨fun h A => ⟨fun u v huv => h _ _ fun G hG f => ?_⟩, fun h X Y f g hh => ?_⟩
· simpa using huv =≫ Pi.π (fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C) => (f.1 : C)) ⟨⟨G, hG⟩, f⟩
· haveI := h Y
refine (cancel_mono (Pi.lift (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => Y ⟶ (G : C)))).1 (limit.hom_ext fun j => ?_)
simpa using hh j.as.1.1 j.as.1.2 j.as.2
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_iff_mono CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_iff_mono
/-- An ingredient of the proof of the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem: a complete well-powered
category with a small coseparating set has an initial object.
In fact, it follows from the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem that `C` is already cocomplete,
see `hasColimits_of_hasLimits_of_isCoseparating`. -/
theorem hasInitial_of_isCoseparating [WellPowered C] [HasLimits C] {𝒢 : Set C} [Small.{v₁} 𝒢]
(h𝒢 : IsCoseparating 𝒢) : HasInitial C := by
haveI : HasProductsOfShape 𝒢 C := hasProductsOfShape_of_small C 𝒢
haveI := fun A => hasProductsOfShape_of_small.{v₁} C (ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C))
letI := completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Subobject (piObj (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C)))
suffices ∀ A : C, Unique (((⊥ : Subobject (piObj (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C))) : C) ⟶ A) by
exact hasInitial_of_unique ((⊥ : Subobject (piObj (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C))) : C)
refine fun A => ⟨⟨?_⟩, fun f => ?_⟩
· let s := Pi.lift fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C) => id (Pi.π (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C)) f.1
let t := Pi.lift (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => A ⟶ (G : C))
haveI : Mono t := (isCoseparating_iff_mono 𝒢).1 h𝒢 A
exact Subobject.ofLEMk _ (pullback.fst : pullback s t ⟶ _) bot_le ≫ pullback.snd
· suffices ∀ (g : Subobject.underlying.obj ⊥ ⟶ A), f = g by
apply this
intro g
suffices IsSplitEpi (equalizer.ι f g) by exact eq_of_epi_equalizer
exact IsSplitEpi.mk' ⟨Subobject.ofLEMk _ (equalizer.ι f g ≫ Subobject.arrow _) bot_le, by
ext
simp⟩
#align category_theory.has_initial_of_is_coseparating CategoryTheory.hasInitial_of_isCoseparating
/-- An ingredient of the proof of the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem: a cocomplete well-copowered
category with a small separating set has a terminal object.
In fact, it follows from the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem that `C` is already complete, see
`hasLimits_of_hasColimits_of_isSeparating`. -/
theorem hasTerminal_of_isSeparating [WellPowered Cᵒᵖ] [HasColimits C] {𝒢 : Set C} [Small.{v₁} 𝒢]
(h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) : HasTerminal C := by
haveI : Small.{v₁} 𝒢.op := small_of_injective (Set.opEquiv_self 𝒢).injective
haveI : HasInitial Cᵒᵖ := hasInitial_of_isCoseparating ((isCoseparating_op_iff _).2 h𝒢)
exact hasTerminal_of_hasInitial_op
#align category_theory.has_terminal_of_is_separating CategoryTheory.hasTerminal_of_isSeparating
section WellPowered
namespace Subobject
theorem eq_of_le_of_isDetecting {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {X : C} (P Q : Subobject X)
(h₁ : P ≤ Q) (h₂ : ∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ {f : G ⟶ X}, Q.Factors f → P.Factors f) : P = Q := by
suffices IsIso (ofLE _ _ h₁) by exact le_antisymm h₁ (le_of_comm (inv (ofLE _ _ h₁)) (by simp))
refine h𝒢 _ fun G hG f => ?_
have : P.Factors (f ≫ Q.arrow) := h₂ _ hG ((factors_iff _ _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩)
refine ⟨factorThru _ _ this, ?_, fun g (hg : g ≫ _ = f) => ?_⟩
· simp only [← cancel_mono Q.arrow, Category.assoc, ofLE_arrow, factorThru_arrow]
· simp only [← cancel_mono (Subobject.ofLE _ _ h₁), ← cancel_mono Q.arrow, hg, Category.assoc,
ofLE_arrow, factorThru_arrow]
#align category_theory.subobject.eq_of_le_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.Subobject.eq_of_le_of_isDetecting
theorem inf_eq_of_isDetecting [HasPullbacks C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {X : C}
(P Q : Subobject X) (h : ∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ {f : G ⟶ X}, P.Factors f → Q.Factors f) : P ⊓ Q = P :=
eq_of_le_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ _root_.inf_le_left
fun _ hG _ hf => (inf_factors _).2 ⟨hf, h _ hG hf⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.inf_eq_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.Subobject.inf_eq_of_isDetecting
theorem eq_of_isDetecting [HasPullbacks C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {X : C}
(P Q : Subobject X) (h : ∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ {f : G ⟶ X}, P.Factors f ↔ Q.Factors f) : P = Q :=
calc
P = P ⊓ Q := Eq.symm <| inf_eq_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG _ hf => (h G hG).1 hf
_ = Q ⊓ P := inf_comm ..
_ = Q := inf_eq_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG _ hf => (h G hG).2 hf
#align category_theory.subobject.eq_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.Subobject.eq_of_isDetecting
end Subobject
/-- A category with pullbacks and a small detecting set is well-powered. -/
theorem wellPowered_of_isDetecting [HasPullbacks C] {𝒢 : Set C} [Small.{v₁} 𝒢]
(h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) : WellPowered C :=
⟨fun X =>
@small_of_injective _ _ _ (fun P : Subobject X => { f : ΣG : 𝒢, G.1 ⟶ X | P.Factors f.2 })
fun P Q h => Subobject.eq_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ (by simpa [Set.ext_iff] using h)⟩
#align category_theory.well_powered_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.wellPowered_of_isDetecting
end WellPowered
namespace StructuredArrow
variable (S : D) (T : C ⥤ D)
theorem isCoseparating_proj_preimage {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsCoseparating 𝒢) :
IsCoseparating ((proj S T).obj ⁻¹' 𝒢) := by
refine fun X Y f g hfg => ext _ _ (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => ?_)
exact congr_arg CommaMorphism.right (hfg (mk (Y.hom ≫ T.map h)) hG (homMk h rfl))
#align category_theory.structured_arrow.is_coseparating_proj_preimage CategoryTheory.StructuredArrow.isCoseparating_proj_preimage
end StructuredArrow
namespace CostructuredArrow
variable (S : C ⥤ D) (T : D)
theorem isSeparating_proj_preimage {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) :
IsSeparating ((proj S T).obj ⁻¹' 𝒢) := by
refine fun X Y f g hfg => ext _ _ (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => ?_)
exact congr_arg CommaMorphism.left (hfg (mk (S.map h ≫ X.hom)) hG (homMk h rfl))
#align category_theory.costructured_arrow.is_separating_proj_preimage CategoryTheory.CostructuredArrow.isSeparating_proj_preimage
end CostructuredArrow
/-- We say that `G` is a separator if the functor `C(G, -)` is faithful. -/
def IsSeparator (G : C) : Prop :=
IsSeparating ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_separator CategoryTheory.IsSeparator
/-- We say that `G` is a coseparator if the functor `C(-, G)` is faithful. -/
def IsCoseparator (G : C) : Prop :=
IsCoseparating ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_coseparator CategoryTheory.IsCoseparator
/-- We say that `G` is a detector if the functor `C(G, -)` reflects isomorphisms. -/
def IsDetector (G : C) : Prop :=
IsDetecting ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_detector CategoryTheory.IsDetector
/-- We say that `G` is a codetector if the functor `C(-, G)` reflects isomorphisms. -/
def IsCodetector (G : C) : Prop :=
IsCodetecting ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_codetector CategoryTheory.IsCodetector
section Dual
theorem isSeparator_op_iff (G : C) : IsSeparator (op G) ↔ IsCoseparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isSeparating_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
#align category_theory.is_separator_op_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparator_op_iff
theorem isCoseparator_op_iff (G : C) : IsCoseparator (op G) ↔ IsSeparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isCoseparating_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
#align category_theory.is_coseparator_op_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparator_op_iff
theorem isCoseparator_unop_iff (G : Cᵒᵖ) : IsCoseparator (unop G) ↔ IsSeparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isCoseparating_unop_iff, Set.singleton_unop]
#align category_theory.is_coseparator_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparator_unop_iff
theorem isSeparator_unop_iff (G : Cᵒᵖ) : IsSeparator (unop G) ↔ IsCoseparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isSeparating_unop_iff, Set.singleton_unop]
#align category_theory.is_separator_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparator_unop_iff
theorem isDetector_op_iff (G : C) : IsDetector (op G) ↔ IsCodetector G := by
rw [IsDetector, IsCodetector, ← isDetecting_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
#align category_theory.is_detector_op_iff CategoryTheory.isDetector_op_iff
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Generator.lean | 424 | 425 | theorem isCodetector_op_iff (G : C) : IsCodetector (op G) ↔ IsDetector G := by |
rw [IsDetector, IsCodetector, ← isCodetecting_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import number_theory.zsqrtd.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
re : ℤ
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
#align zsqrtd Zsqrtd
#align zsqrtd.ext Zsqrtd.ext_iff
prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
#align zsqrtd.of_int Zsqrtd.ofInt
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.of_int_re Zsqrtd.ofInt_re
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.of_int_im Zsqrtd.ofInt_im
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.zero_re Zsqrtd.zero_re
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.zero_im Zsqrtd.zero_im
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.one_re Zsqrtd.one_re
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.one_im Zsqrtd.one_im
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd Zsqrtd.sqrtd
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd_re Zsqrtd.sqrtd_re
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd_im Zsqrtd.sqrtd_im
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_def Zsqrtd.add_def
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_re Zsqrtd.add_re
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_im Zsqrtd.add_im
#noalign zsqrtd.bit0_re
#noalign zsqrtd.bit0_im
#noalign zsqrtd.bit1_re
#noalign zsqrtd.bit1_im
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.neg_re Zsqrtd.neg_re
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.neg_im Zsqrtd.neg_im
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.mul_re Zsqrtd.mul_re
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.mul_im Zsqrtd.mul_im
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
add_left_neg := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_mk Zsqrtd.star_mk
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_re Zsqrtd.star_re
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_im Zsqrtd.star_im
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive x := Zsqrtd.ext _ _ rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add a b := Zsqrtd.ext _ _ rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, (Zsqrtd.ext_iff 0 1).not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_re Zsqrtd.natCast_re
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_im Zsqrtd.natCast_im
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_val Zsqrtd.natCast_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_re Zsqrtd.intCast_re
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_im Zsqrtd.intCast_im
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_val Zsqrtd.intCast_val
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
#align zsqrtd.of_int_eq_coe Zsqrtd.ofInt_eq_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_nat_re := natCast_re
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_nat_im := natCast_im
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_nat_val := natCast_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_int_re := intCast_re
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_int_im := intCast_im
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_int_val := intCast_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias ofInt_eq_coe := ofInt_eq_intCast
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.smul_val Zsqrtd.smul_val
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
#align zsqrtd.smul_re Zsqrtd.smul_re
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
#align zsqrtd.smul_im Zsqrtd.smul_im
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.muld_val Zsqrtd.muld_val
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.dmuld Zsqrtd.dmuld
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.smuld_val Zsqrtd.smuld_val
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.decompose Zsqrtd.decompose
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
#align zsqrtd.mul_star Zsqrtd.mul_star
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_add := Int.cast_add
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_sub := Int.cast_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul := Int.cast_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_inj := Int.cast_inj
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_dvd_iff Zsqrtd.intCast_dvd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_dvd_coe_int Zsqrtd.intCast_dvd_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_dvd_iff := intCast_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_dvd_coe_int := intCast_dvd_intCast
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
#align zsqrtd.eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left Zsqrtd.eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
#align zsqrtd.gcd_eq_zero_iff Zsqrtd.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
#align zsqrtd.gcd_pos_iff Zsqrtd.gcd_pos_iff
theorem coprime_of_dvd_coprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext b 0 hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
#align zsqrtd.coprime_of_dvd_coprime Zsqrtd.coprime_of_dvd_coprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [← Int.gcd_eq_one_iff_coprime, H1]
#align zsqrtd.exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos Zsqrtd.exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
#align zsqrtd.sq_le Zsqrtd.SqLe
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
#align zsqrtd.sq_le_of_le Zsqrtd.sqLe_of_le
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
#align zsqrtd.sq_le_add_mixed Zsqrtd.sqLe_add_mixed
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
#align zsqrtd.sq_le_add Zsqrtd.sqLe_add
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
#align zsqrtd.sq_le_cancel Zsqrtd.sqLe_cancel
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
#align zsqrtd.sq_le_smul Zsqrtd.sqLe_smul
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.ofNat_add, Int.ofNat_mul]
ring
#align zsqrtd.sq_le_mul Zsqrtd.sqLe_mul
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
#align zsqrtd.nonnegg Zsqrtd.Nonnegg
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
induction x <;> induction y <;> rfl
#align zsqrtd.nonnegg_comm Zsqrtd.nonnegg_comm
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rw [← Int.negSucc_coe]; rfl
#align zsqrtd.nonnegg_neg_pos Zsqrtd.nonnegg_neg_pos
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
#align zsqrtd.nonnegg_pos_neg Zsqrtd.nonnegg_pos_neg
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
#align zsqrtd.nonnegg_cases_right Zsqrtd.nonnegg_cases_right
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
#align zsqrtd.nonnegg_cases_left Zsqrtd.nonnegg_cases_left
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
#align zsqrtd.norm Zsqrtd.norm
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.norm_def Zsqrtd.norm_def
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
#align zsqrtd.norm_zero Zsqrtd.norm_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
#align zsqrtd.norm_one Zsqrtd.norm_one
@[simp]
theorem norm_intCast (n : ℤ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n := by simp [norm]
#align zsqrtd.norm_int_cast Zsqrtd.norm_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias norm_int_cast := norm_intCast
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n :=
norm_intCast n
#align zsqrtd.norm_nat_cast Zsqrtd.norm_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias norm_nat_cast := norm_natCast
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (n m : ℤ√d) : norm (n * m) = norm n * norm m := by
simp only [norm, mul_im, mul_re]
ring
#align zsqrtd.norm_mul Zsqrtd.norm_mul
/-- `norm` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def normMonoidHom : ℤ√d →* ℤ where
toFun := norm
map_mul' := norm_mul
map_one' := norm_one
#align zsqrtd.norm_monoid_hom Zsqrtd.normMonoidHom
theorem norm_eq_mul_conj (n : ℤ√d) : (norm n : ℤ√d) = n * star n := by
ext <;> simp [norm, star, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align zsqrtd.norm_eq_mul_conj Zsqrtd.norm_eq_mul_conj
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (x : ℤ√d) : (-x).norm = x.norm :=
-- Porting note: replaced `simp` with `rw`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
Int.cast_inj.1 <| by rw [norm_eq_mul_conj, star_neg, neg_mul_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj]
#align zsqrtd.norm_neg Zsqrtd.norm_neg
@[simp]
theorem norm_conj (x : ℤ√d) : (star x).norm = x.norm :=
-- Porting note: replaced `simp` with `rw`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
Int.cast_inj.1 <| by rw [norm_eq_mul_conj, star_star, mul_comm, norm_eq_mul_conj]
#align zsqrtd.norm_conj Zsqrtd.norm_conj
theorem norm_nonneg (hd : d ≤ 0) (n : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ n.norm :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)
(by
rw [mul_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hd) (mul_self_nonneg _))
#align zsqrtd.norm_nonneg Zsqrtd.norm_nonneg
theorem norm_eq_one_iff {x : ℤ√d} : x.norm.natAbs = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h =>
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <|
(le_total 0 (norm x)).casesOn
(fun hx =>
⟨star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
norm_eq_mul_conj, eq_comm] at h⟩)
fun hx =>
⟨-star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
Int.cast_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, eq_comm] at h⟩,
fun h => by
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h
have := congr_arg (Int.natAbs ∘ norm) hy
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul, norm_one,
Int.natAbs_one, eq_comm, mul_eq_one] at this
exact this.1⟩
#align zsqrtd.norm_eq_one_iff Zsqrtd.norm_eq_one_iff
theorem isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit {d : ℤ} (z : ℤ√d) : IsUnit z ↔ IsUnit z.norm := by
rw [Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, norm_eq_one_iff]
#align zsqrtd.is_unit_iff_norm_is_unit Zsqrtd.isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit
theorem norm_eq_one_iff' {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 1 ↔ IsUnit z := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg hd z), Int.ofNat_one]
#align zsqrtd.norm_eq_one_iff' Zsqrtd.norm_eq_one_iff'
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {d : ℤ} (hd : d < 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [norm_def, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_assoc] at h
have left := mul_self_nonneg z.re
have right := neg_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hd.le (mul_self_nonneg z.im))
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff' left right).mp h
ext <;> apply eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero
· exact ha
· rw [neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at hb
exact hb.resolve_left hd.ne
· rintro rfl
exact norm_zero
#align zsqrtd.norm_eq_zero_iff Zsqrtd.norm_eq_zero_iff
theorem norm_eq_of_associated {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) {x y : ℤ√d} (h : Associated x y) :
x.norm = y.norm := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [norm_mul, (norm_eq_one_iff' hd _).mpr u.isUnit, mul_one]
#align zsqrtd.norm_eq_of_associated Zsqrtd.norm_eq_of_associated
end Norm
end
section
variable {d : ℕ}
/-- Nonnegativity of an element of `ℤ√d`. -/
def Nonneg : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Nonnegg d 1 a b
#align zsqrtd.nonneg Zsqrtd.Nonneg
instance : LE (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => Nonneg (b - a)⟩
instance : LT (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => ¬b ≤ a⟩
instance decidableNonnegg (c d a b) : Decidable (Nonnegg c d a b) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> unfold Nonnegg SqLe <;> infer_instance
#align zsqrtd.decidable_nonnegg Zsqrtd.decidableNonnegg
instance decidableNonneg : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Decidable (Nonneg a)
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Zsqrtd.decidableNonnegg _ _ _ _
#align zsqrtd.decidable_nonneg Zsqrtd.decidableNonneg
instance decidableLE : @DecidableRel (ℤ√d) (· ≤ ·) := fun _ _ => decidableNonneg _
#align zsqrtd.decidable_le Zsqrtd.decidableLE
open Int in
theorem nonneg_cases : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → ∃ x y : ℕ, a = ⟨x, y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨x, -y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨-x, y⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), -[y+1]⟩, _ => ⟨x, y + 1, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x + 1, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, h => False.elim h
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_cases Zsqrtd.nonneg_cases
open Int in
theorem nonneg_add_lem {x y z w : ℕ} (xy : Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d)) (zw : Nonneg (⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d)) :
Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ + ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) := by
have : Nonneg ⟨Int.subNatNat x z, Int.subNatNat w y⟩ :=
Int.subNatNat_elim x z
(fun m n i => SqLe y d m 1 → SqLe n 1 w d → Nonneg ⟨i, Int.subNatNat w y⟩)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d (k + j) 1 → SqLe k 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨Int.ofNat j, i⟩)
(fun _ _ _ _ => trivial) fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel zw xy)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d k 1 → SqLe (k + j + 1) 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨-[j+1], i⟩)
(fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel xy zw) fun m n xy zw =>
let t := Nat.le_trans zw (sqLe_of_le (Nat.le_add_right n (m + 1)) le_rfl xy)
have : k + j + 1 ≤ k :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 (by simpa [one_mul] using t)
absurd this (not_le_of_gt <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_add_right _ _))
(nonnegg_pos_neg.1 xy) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 zw)
rw [add_def, neg_add_eq_sub]
rwa [Int.subNatNat_eq_coe, Int.subNatNat_eq_coe] at this
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_add_lem Zsqrtd.nonneg_add_lem
theorem Nonneg.add {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a + b) := by
rcases nonneg_cases ha with ⟨x, y, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases nonneg_cases hb with ⟨z, w, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩
· trivial
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro y (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro x (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro w (by simp [*])))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
-- Porting note: was
-- simpa [add_comm] using
-- nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
· exact nonneg_add_lem ha hb
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro _ h))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· dsimp
rw [add_comm, add_comm (y : ℤ)]
exact nonneg_add_lem hb ha
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
-- Porting note: was
-- simpa [add_comm] using
-- nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
#align zsqrtd.nonneg.add Zsqrtd.Nonneg.add
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a : ℤ√d} : Nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
show _ ↔ Nonneg _ by simp
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_iff_zero_le Zsqrtd.nonneg_iff_zero_le
theorem le_of_le_le {x y z w : ℤ} (xz : x ≤ z) (yw : y ≤ w) : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨z, w⟩ :=
show Nonneg ⟨z - x, w - y⟩ from
match z - x, w - y, Int.le.dest_sub xz, Int.le.dest_sub yw with
| _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => trivial
#align zsqrtd.le_of_le_le Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le
open Int in
protected theorem nonneg_total : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Nonneg a ∨ Nonneg (-a)
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩ => Or.inl trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨(_ + 1 : ℕ), -[_+1]⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
| ⟨-[_+1], (_ + 1 : ℕ)⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_total Zsqrtd.nonneg_total
protected theorem le_total (a b : ℤ√d) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
have t := (b - a).nonneg_total
rwa [neg_sub] at t
#align zsqrtd.le_total Zsqrtd.le_total
instance preorder : Preorder (ℤ√d) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := show Nonneg (a - a) by simp only [sub_self]; trivial
le_trans a b c hab hbc := by simpa [sub_add_sub_cancel'] using hab.add hbc
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := (and_iff_right_of_imp (Zsqrtd.le_total _ _).resolve_left).symm
open Int in
theorem le_arch (a : ℤ√d) : ∃ n : ℕ, a ≤ n := by
obtain ⟨x, y, (h : a ≤ ⟨x, y⟩)⟩ : ∃ x y : ℕ, Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ + -a) :=
match -a with
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨0, 0, by trivial⟩
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨0, y + 1, by simp [add_def, Int.negSucc_coe, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨x + 1, 0, by simp [Int.negSucc_coe, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨x + 1, y + 1, by simp [Int.negSucc_coe, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
refine ⟨x + d * y, h.trans ?_⟩
change Nonneg ⟨↑x + d * y - ↑x, 0 - ↑y⟩
cases' y with y
· simp
trivial
have h : ∀ y, SqLe y d (d * y) 1 := fun y => by
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right (y * y) (Nat.le_mul_self d)
rw [show (x : ℤ) + d * Nat.succ y - x = d * Nat.succ y by simp]
exact h (y + 1)
#align zsqrtd.le_arch Zsqrtd.le_arch
protected theorem add_le_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (ab : a ≤ b) (c : ℤ√d) : c + a ≤ c + b :=
show Nonneg _ by rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]; exact ab
#align zsqrtd.add_le_add_left Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left (a b c : ℤ√d) (h : c + a ≤ c + b) : a ≤ b := by
simpa using Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left _ _ h (-c)
#align zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left Zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left
protected theorem add_lt_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (h : a < b) (c) : c + a < c + b := fun h' =>
h (Zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left _ _ _ h')
#align zsqrtd.add_lt_add_left Zsqrtd.add_lt_add_left
theorem nonneg_smul {a : ℤ√d} {n : ℕ} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg ((n : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast n]
exact
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => by rw [smul_val]; trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_smul Zsqrtd.nonneg_smul
theorem nonneg_muld {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (sqrtd * a) :=
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val, mul_neg]
apply nonnegg_neg_pos.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val]
apply nonnegg_pos_neg.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_muld Zsqrtd.nonneg_muld
theorem nonneg_mul_lem {x y : ℕ} {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ * a) := by
have : (⟨x, y⟩ * a : ℤ√d) = (x : ℤ√d) * a + sqrtd * ((y : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [decompose, right_distrib, mul_assoc, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [this]
exact (nonneg_smul ha).add (nonneg_muld <| nonneg_smul ha)
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_mul_lem Zsqrtd.nonneg_mul_lem
theorem nonneg_mul {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a * b) :=
match a, b, nonneg_cases ha, nonneg_cases hb, ha, hb with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _, _ => trivial
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_mul.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.right.left (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_pos_neg.2
(sqLe_mul.right.right.right (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
#align zsqrtd.nonneg_mul Zsqrtd.nonneg_mul
protected theorem mul_nonneg (a b : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b := by
simp_rw [← nonneg_iff_zero_le]
exact nonneg_mul
#align zsqrtd.mul_nonneg Zsqrtd.mul_nonneg
theorem not_sqLe_succ (c d y) (h : 0 < c) : ¬SqLe (y + 1) c 0 d :=
not_le_of_gt <| mul_pos (mul_pos h <| Nat.succ_pos _) <| Nat.succ_pos _
#align zsqrtd.not_sq_le_succ Zsqrtd.not_sqLe_succ
-- Porting note: renamed field and added theorem to make `x` explicit
/-- A nonsquare is a natural number that is not equal to the square of an
integer. This is implemented as a typeclass because it's a necessary condition
for much of the Pell equation theory. -/
class Nonsquare (x : ℕ) : Prop where
ns' : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n
#align zsqrtd.nonsquare Zsqrtd.Nonsquare
theorem Nonsquare.ns (x : ℕ) [Nonsquare x] : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n := ns'
variable [dnsq : Nonsquare d]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) <| Ne.symm <| Nonsquare.ns d 0
#align zsqrtd.d_pos Zsqrtd.d_pos
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 876 | 897 | theorem divides_sq_eq_zero {x y} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
let g := x.gcd y
Or.elim g.eq_zero_or_pos
(fun H => ⟨Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H, Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H⟩) fun gpos =>
False.elim <| by
let ⟨m, n, co, (hx : x = m * g), (hy : y = n * g)⟩ := Nat.exists_coprime _ _
rw [hx, hy] at h
have : m * m = d * (n * n) := by |
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (mul_pos gpos gpos).ne' ?_
-- Porting note: was `simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using h`
calc
g * g * (m * m)
_ = m * g * (m * g) := by ring
_ = d * (n * g) * (n * g) := h
_ = g * g * (d * (n * n)) := by ring
have co2 :=
let co1 := co.mul_right co
co1.mul co1
exact
Nonsquare.ns d m
(Nat.dvd_antisymm (by rw [this]; apply dvd_mul_right) <|
co2.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <| by simp [this])
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.Fin.Basic
namespace Fin
attribute [norm_cast] val_last
protected theorem le_antisymm_iff {x y : Fin n} : x = y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans Nat.le_antisymm_iff
protected theorem le_antisymm {x y : Fin n} (h1 : x ≤ y) (h2 : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
Fin.le_antisymm_iff.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩
/-! ### clamp -/
@[simp] theorem coe_clamp (n m : Nat) : (clamp n m : Nat) = min n m := rfl
/-! ### enum/list -/
@[simp] theorem size_enum (n) : (enum n).size = n := Array.size_ofFn ..
@[simp] theorem enum_zero : (enum 0) = #[] := by simp [enum, Array.ofFn, Array.ofFn.go]
@[simp] theorem getElem_enum (i) (h : i < (enum n).size) : (enum n)[i] = ⟨i, size_enum n ▸ h⟩ :=
Array.getElem_ofFn ..
@[simp] theorem length_list (n) : (list n).length = n := by simp [list]
@[simp] theorem get_list (i : Fin (list n).length) : (list n).get i = i.cast (length_list n) := by
cases i; simp only [list]; rw [← Array.getElem_eq_data_get, getElem_enum, cast_mk]
@[simp] theorem list_zero : list 0 = [] := by simp [list]
theorem list_succ (n) : list (n+1) = 0 :: (list n).map Fin.succ := by
apply List.ext_get; simp; intro i; cases i <;> simp
theorem list_succ_last (n) : list (n+1) = (list n).map castSucc ++ [last n] := by
rw [list_succ]
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih =>
rw [list_succ, List.map_cons castSucc, ih]
simp [Function.comp_def, succ_castSucc]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Fin/Lemmas.lean | 49 | 55 | theorem list_reverse (n) : (list n).reverse = (list n).map rev := by |
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih =>
conv => lhs; rw [list_succ_last]
conv => rhs; rw [list_succ]
simp [List.reverse_map, ih, Function.comp_def, rev_succ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Opposites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.set.pointwise.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5e526d18cea33550268dcbbddcb822d5cde40654"
/-!
# Pointwise operations of sets
This file defines pointwise algebraic operations on sets.
## Main declarations
For sets `s` and `t` and scalar `a`:
* `s * t`: Multiplication, set of all `x * y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s + t`: Addition, set of all `x + y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s⁻¹`: Inversion, set of all `x⁻¹` where `x ∈ s`.
* `-s`: Negation, set of all `-x` where `x ∈ s`.
* `s / t`: Division, set of all `x / y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s - t`: Subtraction, set of all `x - y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
For `α` a semigroup/monoid, `Set α` is a semigroup/monoid.
As an unfortunate side effect, this means that `n • s`, where `n : ℕ`, is ambiguous between
pointwise scaling and repeated pointwise addition; the former has `(2 : ℕ) • {1, 2} = {2, 4}`, while
the latter has `(2 : ℕ) • {1, 2} = {2, 3, 4}`. See note [pointwise nat action].
Appropriate definitions and results are also transported to the additive theory via `to_additive`.
## Implementation notes
* The following expressions are considered in simp-normal form in a group:
`(fun h ↦ h * g) ⁻¹' s`, `(fun h ↦ g * h) ⁻¹' s`, `(fun h ↦ h * g⁻¹) ⁻¹' s`,
`(fun h ↦ g⁻¹ * h) ⁻¹' s`, `s * t`, `s⁻¹`, `(1 : Set _)` (and similarly for additive variants).
Expressions equal to one of these will be simplified.
* We put all instances in the locale `Pointwise`, so that these instances are not available by
default. Note that we do not mark them as reducible (as argued by note [reducible non-instances])
since we expect the locale to be open whenever the instances are actually used (and making the
instances reducible changes the behavior of `simp`.
## Tags
set multiplication, set addition, pointwise addition, pointwise multiplication,
pointwise subtraction
-/
library_note "pointwise nat action"/--
Pointwise monoids (`Set`, `Finset`, `Filter`) have derived pointwise actions of the form
`SMul α β → SMul α (Set β)`. When `α` is `ℕ` or `ℤ`, this action conflicts with the
nat or int action coming from `Set β` being a `Monoid` or `DivInvMonoid`. For example,
`2 • {a, b}` can both be `{2 • a, 2 • b}` (pointwise action, pointwise repeated addition,
`Set.smulSet`) and `{a + a, a + b, b + a, b + b}` (nat or int action, repeated pointwise
addition, `Set.NSMul`).
Because the pointwise action can easily be spelled out in such cases, we give higher priority to the
nat and int actions.
-/
open Function
variable {F α β γ : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### `0`/`1` as sets -/
section One
variable [One α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
/-- The set `1 : Set α` is defined as `{1}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The set `0 : Set α` is defined as `{0}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected noncomputable def one : One (Set α) :=
⟨{1}⟩
#align set.has_one Set.one
#align set.has_zero Set.zero
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.one Set.zero
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_one : ({1} : Set α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align set.singleton_one Set.singleton_one
#align set.singleton_zero Set.singleton_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_one : a ∈ (1 : Set α) ↔ a = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_one Set.mem_one
#align set.mem_zero Set.mem_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one : (1 : α) ∈ (1 : Set α) :=
Eq.refl _
#align set.one_mem_one Set.one_mem_one
#align set.zero_mem_zero Set.zero_mem_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_subset : 1 ⊆ s ↔ (1 : α) ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_iff
#align set.one_subset Set.one_subset
#align set.zero_subset Set.zero_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem one_nonempty : (1 : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨1, rfl⟩
#align set.one_nonempty Set.one_nonempty
#align set.zero_nonempty Set.zero_nonempty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image_one {f : α → β} : f '' 1 = {f 1} :=
image_singleton
#align set.image_one Set.image_one
#align set.image_zero Set.image_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_one_iff_eq : s ⊆ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = 1 :=
subset_singleton_iff_eq
#align set.subset_one_iff_eq Set.subset_one_iff_eq
#align set.subset_zero_iff_eq Set.subset_zero_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.subset_one_iff (h : s.Nonempty) : s ⊆ 1 ↔ s = 1 :=
h.subset_singleton_iff
#align set.nonempty.subset_one_iff Set.Nonempty.subset_one_iff
#align set.nonempty.subset_zero_iff Set.Nonempty.subset_zero_iff
/-- The singleton operation as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as a `ZeroHom`."]
noncomputable def singletonOneHom : OneHom α (Set α) where
toFun := singleton; map_one' := singleton_one
#align set.singleton_one_hom Set.singletonOneHom
#align set.singleton_zero_hom Set.singletonZeroHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_singletonOneHom : (singletonOneHom : α → Set α) = singleton :=
rfl
#align set.coe_singleton_one_hom Set.coe_singletonOneHom
#align set.coe_singleton_zero_hom Set.coe_singletonZeroHom
end One
/-! ### Set negation/inversion -/
section Inv
/-- The pointwise inversion of set `s⁻¹` is defined as `{x | x⁻¹ ∈ s}` in locale `Pointwise`. It is
equal to `{x⁻¹ | x ∈ s}`, see `Set.image_inv`. -/
@[to_additive
"The pointwise negation of set `-s` is defined as `{x | -x ∈ s}` in locale `Pointwise`.
It is equal to `{-x | x ∈ s}`, see `Set.image_neg`."]
protected def inv [Inv α] : Inv (Set α) :=
⟨preimage Inv.inv⟩
#align set.has_inv Set.inv
#align set.has_neg Set.neg
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.inv Set.neg
open Pointwise
section Inv
variable {ι : Sort*} [Inv α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_inv : a ∈ s⁻¹ ↔ a⁻¹ ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_inv Set.mem_inv
#align set.mem_neg Set.mem_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_preimage : Inv.inv ⁻¹' s = s⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align set.inv_preimage Set.inv_preimage
#align set.neg_preimage Set.neg_preimage
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_empty : (∅ : Set α)⁻¹ = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.inv_empty Set.inv_empty
#align set.neg_empty Set.neg_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_univ : (univ : Set α)⁻¹ = univ :=
rfl
#align set.inv_univ Set.inv_univ
#align set.neg_univ Set.neg_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inter_inv : (s ∩ t)⁻¹ = s⁻¹ ∩ t⁻¹ :=
preimage_inter
#align set.inter_inv Set.inter_inv
#align set.inter_neg Set.inter_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem union_inv : (s ∪ t)⁻¹ = s⁻¹ ∪ t⁻¹ :=
preimage_union
#align set.union_inv Set.union_inv
#align set.union_neg Set.union_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem iInter_inv (s : ι → Set α) : (⋂ i, s i)⁻¹ = ⋂ i, (s i)⁻¹ :=
preimage_iInter
#align set.Inter_inv Set.iInter_inv
#align set.Inter_neg Set.iInter_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem iUnion_inv (s : ι → Set α) : (⋃ i, s i)⁻¹ = ⋃ i, (s i)⁻¹ :=
preimage_iUnion
#align set.Union_inv Set.iUnion_inv
#align set.Union_neg Set.iUnion_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem compl_inv : sᶜ⁻¹ = s⁻¹ᶜ :=
preimage_compl
#align set.compl_inv Set.compl_inv
#align set.compl_neg Set.compl_neg
end Inv
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv : a⁻¹ ∈ s⁻¹ ↔ a ∈ s := by simp only [mem_inv, inv_inv]
#align set.inv_mem_inv Set.inv_mem_inv
#align set.neg_mem_neg Set.neg_mem_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nonempty_inv : s⁻¹.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
inv_involutive.surjective.nonempty_preimage
#align set.nonempty_inv Set.nonempty_inv
#align set.nonempty_neg Set.nonempty_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.inv (h : s.Nonempty) : s⁻¹.Nonempty :=
nonempty_inv.2 h
#align set.nonempty.inv Set.Nonempty.inv
#align set.nonempty.neg Set.Nonempty.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image_inv : Inv.inv '' s = s⁻¹ :=
congr_fun (image_eq_preimage_of_inverse inv_involutive.leftInverse inv_involutive.rightInverse) _
#align set.image_inv Set.image_inv
#align set.image_neg Set.image_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_empty : s⁻¹ = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← image_inv, image_eq_empty]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
noncomputable instance involutiveInv : InvolutiveInv (Set α) where
inv := Inv.inv
inv_inv s := by simp only [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, inv_inv, preimage_id']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_subset_inv : s⁻¹ ⊆ t⁻¹ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
(Equiv.inv α).surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
#align set.inv_subset_inv Set.inv_subset_inv
#align set.neg_subset_neg Set.neg_subset_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_subset : s⁻¹ ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_subset_inv, inv_inv]
#align set.inv_subset Set.inv_subset
#align set.neg_subset Set.neg_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α)⁻¹ = {a⁻¹} := by rw [← image_inv, image_singleton]
#align set.inv_singleton Set.inv_singleton
#align set.neg_singleton Set.neg_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s)⁻¹ = insert a⁻¹ s⁻¹ := by
rw [insert_eq, union_inv, inv_singleton, insert_eq]
#align set.inv_insert Set.inv_insert
#align set.neg_insert Set.neg_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} : (range f)⁻¹ = range fun i => (f i)⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv]
exact (range_comp _ _).symm
#align set.inv_range Set.inv_range
#align set.neg_range Set.neg_range
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem image_op_inv : op '' s⁻¹ = (op '' s)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [← image_inv, Function.Semiconj.set_image op_inv s]
#align set.image_op_inv Set.image_op_inv
#align set.image_op_neg Set.image_op_neg
end InvolutiveInv
end Inv
open Pointwise
/-! ### Set addition/multiplication -/
section Mul
variable {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} [Mul α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The pointwise multiplication of sets `s * t` and `t` is defined as `{x * y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in
locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"The pointwise addition of sets `s + t` is defined as `{x + y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in locale
`Pointwise`."]
protected def mul : Mul (Set α) :=
⟨image2 (· * ·)⟩
#align set.has_mul Set.mul
#align set.has_add Set.add
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.mul Set.add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image2_mul : image2 (· * ·) s t = s * t :=
rfl
#align set.image2_mul Set.image2_mul
#align set.image2_add Set.image2_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_mul : a ∈ s * t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x * y = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_mul Set.mem_mul
#align set.mem_add Set.mem_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a * b ∈ s * t :=
mem_image2_of_mem
#align set.mul_mem_mul Set.mul_mem_mul
#align set.add_mem_add Set.add_mem_add
@[to_additive add_image_prod]
theorem image_mul_prod : (fun x : α × α => x.fst * x.snd) '' s ×ˢ t = s * t :=
image_prod _
#align set.image_mul_prod Set.image_mul_prod
#align set.add_image_prod Set.add_image_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem empty_mul : ∅ * s = ∅ :=
image2_empty_left
#align set.empty_mul Set.empty_mul
#align set.empty_add Set.empty_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_empty : s * ∅ = ∅ :=
image2_empty_right
#align set.mul_empty Set.mul_empty
#align set.add_empty Set.add_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_empty : s * t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image2_eq_empty_iff
#align set.mul_eq_empty Set.mul_eq_empty
#align set.add_eq_empty Set.add_eq_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_nonempty : (s * t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image2_nonempty_iff
#align set.mul_nonempty Set.mul_nonempty
#align set.add_nonempty Set.add_nonempty
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.mul : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s * t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image2
#align set.nonempty.mul Set.Nonempty.mul
#align set.nonempty.add Set.Nonempty.add
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_mul_left : (s * t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_left
#align set.nonempty.of_mul_left Set.Nonempty.of_mul_left
#align set.nonempty.of_add_left Set.Nonempty.of_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_mul_right : (s * t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_right
#align set.nonempty.of_mul_right Set.Nonempty.of_mul_right
#align set.nonempty.of_add_right Set.Nonempty.of_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_singleton : s * {b} = (· * b) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
#align set.mul_singleton Set.mul_singleton
#align set.add_singleton Set.add_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singleton_mul : {a} * t = (a * ·) '' t :=
image2_singleton_left
#align set.singleton_mul Set.singleton_mul
#align set.singleton_add Set.singleton_add
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_singleton : ({a} : Set α) * {b} = {a * b} :=
image2_singleton
#align set.singleton_mul_singleton Set.singleton_mul_singleton
#align set.singleton_add_singleton Set.singleton_add_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem mul_subset_mul : s₁ ⊆ t₁ → s₂ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ * s₂ ⊆ t₁ * t₂ :=
image2_subset
#align set.mul_subset_mul Set.mul_subset_mul
#align set.add_subset_add Set.add_subset_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_mul_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s * t₁ ⊆ s * t₂ :=
image2_subset_left
#align set.mul_subset_mul_left Set.mul_subset_mul_left
#align set.add_subset_add_left Set.add_subset_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_mul_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ * t ⊆ s₂ * t :=
image2_subset_right
#align set.mul_subset_mul_right Set.mul_subset_mul_right
#align set.add_subset_add_right Set.add_subset_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_iff : s * t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x * y ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
#align set.mul_subset_iff Set.mul_subset_iff
#align set.add_subset_iff Set.add_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem union_mul : (s₁ ∪ s₂) * t = s₁ * t ∪ s₂ * t :=
image2_union_left
#align set.union_mul Set.union_mul
#align set.union_add Set.union_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_union : s * (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s * t₁ ∪ s * t₂ :=
image2_union_right
#align set.mul_union Set.mul_union
#align set.add_union Set.add_union
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_mul_subset : s₁ ∩ s₂ * t ⊆ s₁ * t ∩ (s₂ * t) :=
image2_inter_subset_left
#align set.inter_mul_subset Set.inter_mul_subset
#align set.inter_add_subset Set.inter_add_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inter_subset : s * (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s * t₁ ∩ (s * t₂) :=
image2_inter_subset_right
#align set.mul_inter_subset Set.mul_inter_subset
#align set.add_inter_subset Set.add_inter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_mul_union_subset_union : s₁ ∩ s₂ * (t₁ ∪ t₂) ⊆ s₁ * t₁ ∪ s₂ * t₂ :=
image2_inter_union_subset_union
#align set.inter_mul_union_subset_union Set.inter_mul_union_subset_union
#align set.inter_add_union_subset_union Set.inter_add_union_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem union_mul_inter_subset_union : (s₁ ∪ s₂) * (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s₁ * t₁ ∪ s₂ * t₂ :=
image2_union_inter_subset_union
#align set.union_mul_inter_subset_union Set.union_mul_inter_subset_union
#align set.union_add_inter_subset_union Set.union_add_inter_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_mul_left_image : ⋃ a ∈ s, (a * ·) '' t = s * t :=
iUnion_image_left _
#align set.Union_mul_left_image Set.iUnion_mul_left_image
#align set.Union_add_left_image Set.iUnion_add_left_image
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_mul_right_image : ⋃ a ∈ t, (· * a) '' s = s * t :=
iUnion_image_right _
#align set.Union_mul_right_image Set.iUnion_mul_right_image
#align set.Union_add_right_image Set.iUnion_add_right_image
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_mul (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋃ i, s i) * t = ⋃ i, s i * t :=
image2_iUnion_left _ _ _
#align set.Union_mul Set.iUnion_mul
#align set.Union_add Set.iUnion_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set α) : (s * ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s * t i :=
image2_iUnion_right _ _ _
#align set.mul_Union Set.mul_iUnion
#align set.add_Union Set.add_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion₂_mul (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) * t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j * t :=
image2_iUnion₂_left _ _ _
#align set.Union₂_mul Set.iUnion₂_mul
#align set.Union₂_add Set.iUnion₂_add
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s * ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s * t i j :=
image2_iUnion₂_right _ _ _
#align set.mul_Union₂ Set.mul_iUnion₂
#align set.add_Union₂ Set.add_iUnion₂
@[to_additive]
theorem iInter_mul_subset (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) * t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i * t :=
Set.image2_iInter_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter_mul_subset Set.iInter_mul_subset
#align set.Inter_add_subset Set.iInter_add_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iInter_subset (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set α) : (s * ⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, s * t i :=
image2_iInter_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.mul_Inter_subset Set.mul_iInter_subset
#align set.add_Inter_subset Set.add_iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem iInter₂_mul_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) * t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j * t :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter₂_mul_subset Set.iInter₂_mul_subset
#align set.Inter₂_add_subset Set.iInter₂_add_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iInter₂_subset (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s * ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s * t i j :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.mul_Inter₂_subset Set.mul_iInter₂_subset
#align set.add_Inter₂_subset Set.add_iInter₂_subset
/-- The singleton operation as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as an `AddHom`."]
noncomputable def singletonMulHom : α →ₙ* Set α where
toFun := singleton
map_mul' _ _ := singleton_mul_singleton.symm
#align set.singleton_mul_hom Set.singletonMulHom
#align set.singleton_add_hom Set.singletonAddHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_singletonMulHom : (singletonMulHom : α → Set α) = singleton :=
rfl
#align set.coe_singleton_mul_hom Set.coe_singletonMulHom
#align set.coe_singleton_add_hom Set.coe_singletonAddHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singletonMulHom_apply (a : α) : singletonMulHom a = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.singleton_mul_hom_apply Set.singletonMulHom_apply
#align set.singleton_add_hom_apply Set.singletonAddHom_apply
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image_op_mul : op '' (s * t) = op '' t * op '' s :=
image_image2_antidistrib op_mul
#align set.image_op_mul Set.image_op_mul
#align set.image_op_add Set.image_op_add
end Mul
/-! ### Set subtraction/division -/
section Div
variable {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} [Div α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The pointwise division of sets `s / t` is defined as `{x / y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in locale
`Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"The pointwise subtraction of sets `s - t` is defined as `{x - y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in locale
`Pointwise`."]
protected def div : Div (Set α) :=
⟨image2 (· / ·)⟩
#align set.has_div Set.div
#align set.has_sub Set.sub
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.div Set.sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image2_div : image2 Div.div s t = s / t :=
rfl
#align set.image2_div Set.image2_div
#align set.image2_sub Set.image2_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_div : a ∈ s / t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x / y = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_div Set.mem_div
#align set.mem_sub Set.mem_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a / b ∈ s / t :=
mem_image2_of_mem
#align set.div_mem_div Set.div_mem_div
#align set.sub_mem_sub Set.sub_mem_sub
@[to_additive sub_image_prod]
theorem image_div_prod : (fun x : α × α => x.fst / x.snd) '' s ×ˢ t = s / t :=
image_prod _
#align set.image_div_prod Set.image_div_prod
#align set.sub_image_prod Set.sub_image_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem empty_div : ∅ / s = ∅ :=
image2_empty_left
#align set.empty_div Set.empty_div
#align set.empty_sub Set.empty_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_empty : s / ∅ = ∅ :=
image2_empty_right
#align set.div_empty Set.div_empty
#align set.sub_empty Set.sub_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_empty : s / t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image2_eq_empty_iff
#align set.div_eq_empty Set.div_eq_empty
#align set.sub_eq_empty Set.sub_eq_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_nonempty : (s / t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image2_nonempty_iff
#align set.div_nonempty Set.div_nonempty
#align set.sub_nonempty Set.sub_nonempty
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.div : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s / t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image2
#align set.nonempty.div Set.Nonempty.div
#align set.nonempty.sub Set.Nonempty.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_div_left : (s / t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_left
#align set.nonempty.of_div_left Set.Nonempty.of_div_left
#align set.nonempty.of_sub_left Set.Nonempty.of_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_div_right : (s / t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_right
#align set.nonempty.of_div_right Set.Nonempty.of_div_right
#align set.nonempty.of_sub_right Set.Nonempty.of_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_singleton : s / {b} = (· / b) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
#align set.div_singleton Set.div_singleton
#align set.sub_singleton Set.sub_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singleton_div : {a} / t = (· / ·) a '' t :=
image2_singleton_left
#align set.singleton_div Set.singleton_div
#align set.singleton_sub Set.singleton_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_singleton : ({a} : Set α) / {b} = {a / b} :=
image2_singleton
#align set.singleton_div_singleton Set.singleton_div_singleton
#align set.singleton_sub_singleton Set.singleton_sub_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem div_subset_div : s₁ ⊆ t₁ → s₂ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ / s₂ ⊆ t₁ / t₂ :=
image2_subset
#align set.div_subset_div Set.div_subset_div
#align set.sub_subset_sub Set.sub_subset_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_subset_div_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s / t₁ ⊆ s / t₂ :=
image2_subset_left
#align set.div_subset_div_left Set.div_subset_div_left
#align set.sub_subset_sub_left Set.sub_subset_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem div_subset_div_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ / t ⊆ s₂ / t :=
image2_subset_right
#align set.div_subset_div_right Set.div_subset_div_right
#align set.sub_subset_sub_right Set.sub_subset_sub_right
@[to_additive]
theorem div_subset_iff : s / t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x / y ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
#align set.div_subset_iff Set.div_subset_iff
#align set.sub_subset_iff Set.sub_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem union_div : (s₁ ∪ s₂) / t = s₁ / t ∪ s₂ / t :=
image2_union_left
#align set.union_div Set.union_div
#align set.union_sub Set.union_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_union : s / (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s / t₁ ∪ s / t₂ :=
image2_union_right
#align set.div_union Set.div_union
#align set.sub_union Set.sub_union
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_div_subset : s₁ ∩ s₂ / t ⊆ s₁ / t ∩ (s₂ / t) :=
image2_inter_subset_left
#align set.inter_div_subset Set.inter_div_subset
#align set.inter_sub_subset Set.inter_sub_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem div_inter_subset : s / (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s / t₁ ∩ (s / t₂) :=
image2_inter_subset_right
#align set.div_inter_subset Set.div_inter_subset
#align set.sub_inter_subset Set.sub_inter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_div_union_subset_union : s₁ ∩ s₂ / (t₁ ∪ t₂) ⊆ s₁ / t₁ ∪ s₂ / t₂ :=
image2_inter_union_subset_union
#align set.inter_div_union_subset_union Set.inter_div_union_subset_union
#align set.inter_sub_union_subset_union Set.inter_sub_union_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem union_div_inter_subset_union : (s₁ ∪ s₂) / (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s₁ / t₁ ∪ s₂ / t₂ :=
image2_union_inter_subset_union
#align set.union_div_inter_subset_union Set.union_div_inter_subset_union
#align set.union_sub_inter_subset_union Set.union_sub_inter_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_div_left_image : ⋃ a ∈ s, (a / ·) '' t = s / t :=
iUnion_image_left _
#align set.Union_div_left_image Set.iUnion_div_left_image
#align set.Union_sub_left_image Set.iUnion_sub_left_image
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_div_right_image : ⋃ a ∈ t, (· / a) '' s = s / t :=
iUnion_image_right _
#align set.Union_div_right_image Set.iUnion_div_right_image
#align set.Union_sub_right_image Set.iUnion_sub_right_image
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_div (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋃ i, s i) / t = ⋃ i, s i / t :=
image2_iUnion_left _ _ _
#align set.Union_div Set.iUnion_div
#align set.Union_sub Set.iUnion_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set α) : (s / ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s / t i :=
image2_iUnion_right _ _ _
#align set.div_Union Set.div_iUnion
#align set.sub_Union Set.sub_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion₂_div (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) / t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j / t :=
image2_iUnion₂_left _ _ _
#align set.Union₂_div Set.iUnion₂_div
#align set.Union₂_sub Set.iUnion₂_sub
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem div_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s / ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s / t i j :=
image2_iUnion₂_right _ _ _
#align set.div_Union₂ Set.div_iUnion₂
#align set.sub_Union₂ Set.sub_iUnion₂
@[to_additive]
theorem iInter_div_subset (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) / t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i / t :=
image2_iInter_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter_div_subset Set.iInter_div_subset
#align set.Inter_sub_subset Set.iInter_sub_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem div_iInter_subset (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set α) : (s / ⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, s / t i :=
image2_iInter_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.div_Inter_subset Set.div_iInter_subset
#align set.sub_Inter_subset Set.sub_iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem iInter₂_div_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) / t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j / t :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter₂_div_subset Set.iInter₂_div_subset
#align set.Inter₂_sub_subset Set.iInter₂_sub_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem div_iInter₂_subset (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s / ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s / t i j :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.div_Inter₂_subset Set.div_iInter₂_subset
#align set.sub_Inter₂_subset Set.sub_iInter₂_subset
end Div
open Pointwise
/-- Repeated pointwise addition (not the same as pointwise repeated addition!) of a `Set`. See
note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def NSMul [Zero α] [Add α] : SMul ℕ (Set α) :=
⟨nsmulRec⟩
#align set.has_nsmul Set.NSMul
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication (not the same as pointwise repeated multiplication!) of a
`Set`. See note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def NPow [One α] [Mul α] : Pow (Set α) ℕ :=
⟨fun s n => npowRec n s⟩
#align set.has_npow Set.NPow
/-- Repeated pointwise addition/subtraction (not the same as pointwise repeated
addition/subtraction!) of a `Set`. See note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def ZSMul [Zero α] [Add α] [Neg α] : SMul ℤ (Set α) :=
⟨zsmulRec⟩
#align set.has_zsmul Set.ZSMul
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication/division (not the same as pointwise repeated
multiplication/division!) of a `Set`. See note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def ZPow [One α] [Mul α] [Inv α] : Pow (Set α) ℤ :=
⟨fun s n => zpowRec npowRec n s⟩
#align set.has_zpow Set.ZPow
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.NSMul Set.NPow Set.ZSMul Set.ZPow
/-- `Set α` is a `Semigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Set α` is an `AddSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected noncomputable def semigroup [Semigroup α] : Semigroup (Set α) :=
{ Set.mul with mul_assoc := fun _ _ _ => image2_assoc mul_assoc }
#align set.semigroup Set.semigroup
#align set.add_semigroup Set.addSemigroup
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup α] {s t : Set α}
/-- `Set α` is a `CommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Set α` is an `AddCommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected noncomputable def commSemigroup : CommSemigroup (Set α) :=
{ Set.semigroup with mul_comm := fun _ _ => image2_comm mul_comm }
#align set.comm_semigroup Set.commSemigroup
#align set.add_comm_semigroup Set.addCommSemigroup
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_mul_union_subset : s ∩ t * (s ∪ t) ⊆ s * t :=
image2_inter_union_subset mul_comm
#align set.inter_mul_union_subset Set.inter_mul_union_subset
#align set.inter_add_union_subset Set.inter_add_union_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem union_mul_inter_subset : (s ∪ t) * (s ∩ t) ⊆ s * t :=
image2_union_inter_subset mul_comm
#align set.union_mul_inter_subset Set.union_mul_inter_subset
#align set.union_add_inter_subset Set.union_add_inter_subset
end CommSemigroup
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α]
/-- `Set α` is a `MulOneClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Set α` is an `AddZeroClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected noncomputable def mulOneClass : MulOneClass (Set α) :=
{ Set.one, Set.mul with
mul_one := image2_right_identity mul_one
one_mul := image2_left_identity one_mul }
#align set.mul_one_class Set.mulOneClass
#align set.add_zero_class Set.addZeroClass
scoped[Pointwise]
attribute [instance]
Set.mulOneClass Set.addZeroClass Set.semigroup Set.addSemigroup Set.commSemigroup
Set.addCommSemigroup
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_mul_left (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (ht : (1 : α) ∈ t) : s ⊆ s * t := fun x hx =>
⟨x, hx, 1, ht, mul_one _⟩
#align set.subset_mul_left Set.subset_mul_left
#align set.subset_add_left Set.subset_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_mul_right {s : Set α} (t : Set α) (hs : (1 : α) ∈ s) : t ⊆ s * t := fun x hx =>
⟨1, hs, x, hx, one_mul _⟩
#align set.subset_mul_right Set.subset_mul_right
#align set.subset_add_right Set.subset_add_right
/-- The singleton operation as a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as an `AddMonoidHom`."]
noncomputable def singletonMonoidHom : α →* Set α :=
{ singletonMulHom, singletonOneHom with }
#align set.singleton_monoid_hom Set.singletonMonoidHom
#align set.singleton_add_monoid_hom Set.singletonAddMonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_singletonMonoidHom : (singletonMonoidHom : α → Set α) = singleton :=
rfl
#align set.coe_singleton_monoid_hom Set.coe_singletonMonoidHom
#align set.coe_singleton_add_monoid_hom Set.coe_singletonAddMonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singletonMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : singletonMonoidHom a = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.singleton_monoid_hom_apply Set.singletonMonoidHom_apply
#align set.singleton_add_monoid_hom_apply Set.singletonAddMonoidHom_apply
end MulOneClass
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {s t : Set α} {a : α} {m n : ℕ}
/-- `Set α` is a `Monoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Set α` is an `AddMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected noncomputable def monoid : Monoid (Set α) :=
{ Set.semigroup, Set.mulOneClass, @Set.NPow α _ _ with }
#align set.monoid Set.monoid
#align set.add_monoid Set.addMonoid
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.monoid Set.addMonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_pow (ha : a ∈ s) : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∈ s ^ n
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact one_mem_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_mem_mul (pow_mem_pow ha _) ha
#align set.pow_mem_pow Set.pow_mem_pow
#align set.nsmul_mem_nsmul Set.nsmul_mem_nsmul
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_subset_pow (hst : s ⊆ t) : ∀ n : ℕ, s ^ n ⊆ t ^ n
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact Subset.rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_subset_mul (pow_subset_pow hst _) hst
#align set.pow_subset_pow Set.pow_subset_pow
#align set.nsmul_subset_nsmul Set.nsmul_subset_nsmul
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_subset_pow_of_one_mem (hs : (1 : α) ∈ s) (hn : m ≤ n) : s ^ m ⊆ s ^ n := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.le_induction` didn't work as an induction principle in mathlib3, this was
-- `refine Nat.le_induction ...`
induction' n, hn using Nat.le_induction with _ _ ih
· exact Subset.rfl
· dsimp only
rw [pow_succ']
exact ih.trans (subset_mul_right _ hs)
#align set.pow_subset_pow_of_one_mem Set.pow_subset_pow_of_one_mem
#align set.nsmul_subset_nsmul_of_zero_mem Set.nsmul_subset_nsmul_of_zero_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem empty_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (∅ : Set α) ^ n = ∅ := by
rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn), pow_succ', empty_mul]
#align set.empty_pow Set.empty_pow
#align set.empty_nsmul Set.empty_nsmul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_univ_of_one_mem (hs : (1 : α) ∈ s) : s * univ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => mem_mul.2 ⟨_, hs, _, mem_univ _, one_mul _⟩
#align set.mul_univ_of_one_mem Set.mul_univ_of_one_mem
#align set.add_univ_of_zero_mem Set.add_univ_of_zero_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem univ_mul_of_one_mem (ht : (1 : α) ∈ t) : univ * t = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => mem_mul.2 ⟨_, mem_univ _, _, ht, mul_one _⟩
#align set.univ_mul_of_one_mem Set.univ_mul_of_one_mem
#align set.univ_add_of_zero_mem Set.univ_add_of_zero_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem univ_mul_univ : (univ : Set α) * univ = univ :=
mul_univ_of_one_mem <| mem_univ _
#align set.univ_mul_univ Set.univ_mul_univ
#align set.univ_add_univ Set.univ_add_univ
--TODO: `to_additive` trips up on the `1 : ℕ` used in the pattern-matching.
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_univ {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → n • (univ : Set α) = univ
| 0 => fun h => (h rfl).elim
| 1 => fun _ => one_nsmul _
| n + 2 => fun _ => by rw [succ_nsmul, nsmul_univ n.succ_ne_zero, univ_add_univ]
#align set.nsmul_univ Set.nsmul_univ
@[to_additive existing (attr := simp) nsmul_univ]
theorem univ_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (univ : Set α) ^ n = univ
| 0 => fun h => (h rfl).elim
| 1 => fun _ => pow_one _
| n + 2 => fun _ => by rw [pow_succ, univ_pow n.succ_ne_zero, univ_mul_univ]
#align set.univ_pow Set.univ_pow
@[to_additive]
protected theorem _root_.IsUnit.set : IsUnit a → IsUnit ({a} : Set α) :=
IsUnit.map (singletonMonoidHom : α →* Set α)
#align is_unit.set IsUnit.set
#align is_add_unit.set IsAddUnit.set
end Monoid
/-- `Set α` is a `CommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Set α` is an `AddCommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected noncomputable def commMonoid [CommMonoid α] : CommMonoid (Set α) :=
{ Set.monoid, Set.commSemigroup with }
#align set.comm_monoid Set.commMonoid
#align set.add_comm_monoid Set.addCommMonoid
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.commMonoid Set.addCommMonoid
open Pointwise
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_eq_one_iff : s * t = 1 ↔ ∃ a b, s = {a} ∧ t = {b} ∧ a * b = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hst : (s * t).Nonempty := h.symm.subst one_nonempty
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hst.of_image2_left
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hst.of_image2_right
have H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a * b = (1 : α) := fun {a b} ha hb =>
h.subset <| mem_image2_of_mem ha hb
refine ⟨a, b, ?_, ?_, H ha hb⟩ <;> refine eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨‹_›, fun x hx => ?_⟩
· exact (eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| H hx hb).trans (inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| H ha hb)
· exact (eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right <| H ha hx).trans (inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| H ha hb)
· rintro ⟨b, c, rfl, rfl, h⟩
rw [singleton_mul_singleton, h, singleton_one]
#align set.mul_eq_one_iff Set.mul_eq_one_iff
#align set.add_eq_zero_iff Set.add_eq_zero_iff
/-- `Set α` is a division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive subtractionMonoid
"`Set α` is a subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected noncomputable def divisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid (Set α) :=
{ Set.monoid, Set.involutiveInv, Set.div, @Set.ZPow α _ _ _ with
mul_inv_rev := fun s t => by
simp_rw [← image_inv]
exact image_image2_antidistrib mul_inv_rev
inv_eq_of_mul := fun s t h => by
obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, hab⟩ := Set.mul_eq_one_iff.1 h
rw [inv_singleton, inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right hab]
div_eq_mul_inv := fun s t => by
rw [← image_id (s / t), ← image_inv]
exact image_image2_distrib_right div_eq_mul_inv }
#align set.division_monoid Set.divisionMonoid
#align set.subtraction_monoid Set.subtractionMonoid
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.divisionMonoid Set.subtractionMonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp 500)]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit s ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, h⟩ := Set.mul_eq_one_iff.1 u.mul_inv
refine ⟨a, ha, ⟨a, b, h, singleton_injective ?_⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← singleton_mul_singleton, ← ha, ← hb]
exact u.inv_mul
· rintro ⟨a, rfl, ha⟩
exact ha.set
#align set.is_unit_iff Set.isUnit_iff
#align set.is_add_unit_iff Set.isAddUnit_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma univ_div_univ : (univ / univ : Set α) = univ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
/-- `Set α` is a commutative division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive subtractionCommMonoid
"`Set α` is a commutative subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected noncomputable def divisionCommMonoid [DivisionCommMonoid α] :
DivisionCommMonoid (Set α) :=
{ Set.divisionMonoid, Set.commSemigroup with }
#align set.division_comm_monoid Set.divisionCommMonoid
#align set.subtraction_comm_monoid Set.subtractionCommMonoid
/-- `Set α` has distributive negation if `α` has. -/
protected noncomputable def hasDistribNeg [Mul α] [HasDistribNeg α] : HasDistribNeg (Set α) :=
{ Set.involutiveNeg with
neg_mul := fun _ _ => by
simp_rw [← image_neg]
exact image2_image_left_comm neg_mul
mul_neg := fun _ _ => by
simp_rw [← image_neg]
exact image_image2_right_comm mul_neg }
#align set.has_distrib_neg Set.hasDistribNeg
scoped[Pointwise]
attribute [instance] Set.divisionCommMonoid Set.subtractionCommMonoid Set.hasDistribNeg
section Distrib
variable [Distrib α] (s t u : Set α)
/-!
Note that `Set α` is not a `Distrib` because `s * t + s * u` has cross terms that `s * (t + u)`
lacks.
-/
theorem mul_add_subset : s * (t + u) ⊆ s * t + s * u :=
image2_distrib_subset_left mul_add
#align set.mul_add_subset Set.mul_add_subset
theorem add_mul_subset : (s + t) * u ⊆ s * u + t * u :=
image2_distrib_subset_right add_mul
#align set.add_mul_subset Set.add_mul_subset
end Distrib
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] {s t : Set α}
/-! Note that `Set` is not a `MulZeroClass` because `0 * ∅ ≠ 0`. -/
theorem mul_zero_subset (s : Set α) : s * 0 ⊆ 0 := by simp [subset_def, mem_mul]
#align set.mul_zero_subset Set.mul_zero_subset
theorem zero_mul_subset (s : Set α) : 0 * s ⊆ 0 := by simp [subset_def, mem_mul]
#align set.zero_mul_subset Set.zero_mul_subset
theorem Nonempty.mul_zero (hs : s.Nonempty) : s * 0 = 0 :=
s.mul_zero_subset.antisymm <| by simpa [mem_mul] using hs
#align set.nonempty.mul_zero Set.Nonempty.mul_zero
theorem Nonempty.zero_mul (hs : s.Nonempty) : 0 * s = 0 :=
s.zero_mul_subset.antisymm <| by simpa [mem_mul] using hs
#align set.nonempty.zero_mul Set.Nonempty.zero_mul
end MulZeroClass
section Group
variable [Group α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-! Note that `Set` is not a `Group` because `s / s ≠ 1` in general. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_mem_div_iff : (1 : α) ∈ s / t ↔ ¬Disjoint s t := by
simp [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, mem_div, div_eq_one, Set.Nonempty]
#align set.one_mem_div_iff Set.one_mem_div_iff
#align set.zero_mem_sub_iff Set.zero_mem_sub_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem not_one_mem_div_iff : (1 : α) ∉ s / t ↔ Disjoint s t :=
one_mem_div_iff.not_left
#align set.not_one_mem_div_iff Set.not_one_mem_div_iff
#align set.not_zero_mem_sub_iff Set.not_zero_mem_sub_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.one_not_mem_div_set⟩ := not_one_mem_div_iff
#align disjoint.one_not_mem_div_set Disjoint.one_not_mem_div_set
attribute [to_additive] Disjoint.one_not_mem_div_set
#align disjoint.zero_not_mem_sub_set Disjoint.zero_not_mem_sub_set
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.one_mem_div (h : s.Nonempty) : (1 : α) ∈ s / s :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
mem_div.2 ⟨a, ha, a, ha, div_self' _⟩
#align set.nonempty.one_mem_div Set.Nonempty.one_mem_div
#align set.nonempty.zero_mem_sub Set.Nonempty.zero_mem_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_singleton (a : α) : IsUnit ({a} : Set α) :=
(Group.isUnit a).set
#align set.is_unit_singleton Set.isUnit_singleton
#align set.is_add_unit_singleton Set.isAddUnit_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isUnit_iff_singleton : IsUnit s ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
simp only [isUnit_iff, Group.isUnit, and_true_iff]
#align set.is_unit_iff_singleton Set.isUnit_iff_singleton
#align set.is_add_unit_iff_singleton Set.isAddUnit_iff_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image_mul_left : (a * ·) '' t = (a⁻¹ * ·) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse] <;> intro c <;> simp
#align set.image_mul_left Set.image_mul_left
#align set.image_add_left Set.image_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image_mul_right : (· * b) '' t = (· * b⁻¹) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse] <;> intro c <;> simp
#align set.image_mul_right Set.image_mul_right
#align set.image_add_right Set.image_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mul_left' : (a⁻¹ * ·) '' t = (a * ·) ⁻¹' t := by simp
#align set.image_mul_left' Set.image_mul_left'
#align set.image_add_left' Set.image_add_left'
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mul_right' : (· * b⁻¹) '' t = (· * b) ⁻¹' t := by simp
#align set.image_mul_right' Set.image_mul_right'
#align set.image_add_right' Set.image_add_right'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_singleton : (a * ·) ⁻¹' {b} = {a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← image_mul_left', image_singleton]
#align set.preimage_mul_left_singleton Set.preimage_mul_left_singleton
#align set.preimage_add_left_singleton Set.preimage_add_left_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_singleton : (· * a) ⁻¹' {b} = {b * a⁻¹} := by
rw [← image_mul_right', image_singleton]
#align set.preimage_mul_right_singleton Set.preimage_mul_right_singleton
#align set.preimage_add_right_singleton Set.preimage_add_right_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_one : (a * ·) ⁻¹' 1 = {a⁻¹} := by
rw [← image_mul_left', image_one, mul_one]
#align set.preimage_mul_left_one Set.preimage_mul_left_one
#align set.preimage_add_left_zero Set.preimage_add_left_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_one : (· * b) ⁻¹' 1 = {b⁻¹} := by
rw [← image_mul_right', image_one, one_mul]
#align set.preimage_mul_right_one Set.preimage_mul_right_one
#align set.preimage_add_right_zero Set.preimage_add_right_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem preimage_mul_left_one' : (a⁻¹ * ·) ⁻¹' 1 = {a} := by simp
#align set.preimage_mul_left_one' Set.preimage_mul_left_one'
#align set.preimage_add_left_zero' Set.preimage_add_left_zero'
@[to_additive]
theorem preimage_mul_right_one' : (· * b⁻¹) ⁻¹' 1 = {b} := by simp
#align set.preimage_mul_right_one' Set.preimage_mul_right_one'
#align set.preimage_add_right_zero' Set.preimage_add_right_zero'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_univ (hs : s.Nonempty) : s * (univ : Set α) = univ :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
eq_univ_of_forall fun b => ⟨a, ha, a⁻¹ * b, trivial, mul_inv_cancel_left _ _⟩
#align set.mul_univ Set.mul_univ
#align set.add_univ Set.add_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem univ_mul (ht : t.Nonempty) : (univ : Set α) * t = univ :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := ht
eq_univ_of_forall fun b => ⟨b * a⁻¹, trivial, a, ha, inv_mul_cancel_right _ _⟩
#align set.univ_mul Set.univ_mul
#align set.univ_add Set.univ_add
end Group
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero α] {s t : Set α}
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Basic.lean | 1,279 | 1,279 | theorem div_zero_subset (s : Set α) : s / 0 ⊆ 0 := by | simp [subset_def, mem_div]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import algebra.quandle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"28aa996fc6fb4317f0083c4e6daf79878d81be33"
/-!
# Racks and Quandles
This file defines racks and quandles, algebraic structures for sets
that bijectively act on themselves with a self-distributivity
property. If `R` is a rack and `act : R → (R ≃ R)` is the self-action,
then the self-distributivity is, equivalently, that
```
act (act x y) = act x * act y * (act x)⁻¹
```
where multiplication is composition in `R ≃ R` as a group.
Quandles are racks such that `act x x = x` for all `x`.
One example of a quandle (not yet in mathlib) is the action of a Lie
algebra on itself, defined by `act x y = Ad (exp x) y`.
Quandles and racks were independently developed by multiple
mathematicians. David Joyce introduced quandles in his thesis
[Joyce1982] to define an algebraic invariant of knot and link
complements that is analogous to the fundamental group of the
exterior, and he showed that the quandle associated to an oriented
knot is invariant up to orientation-reversed mirror image. Racks were
used by Fenn and Rourke for framed codimension-2 knots and
links in [FennRourke1992]. Unital shelves are discussed in [crans2017].
The name "rack" came from wordplay by Conway and Wraith for the "wrack
and ruin" of forgetting everything but the conjugation operation for a
group.
## Main definitions
* `Shelf` is a type with a self-distributive action
* `UnitalShelf` is a shelf with a left and right unit
* `Rack` is a shelf whose action for each element is invertible
* `Quandle` is a rack whose action for an element fixes that element
* `Quandle.conj` defines a quandle of a group acting on itself by conjugation.
* `ShelfHom` is homomorphisms of shelves, racks, and quandles.
* `Rack.EnvelGroup` gives the universal group the rack maps to as a conjugation quandle.
* `Rack.oppositeRack` gives the rack with the action replaced by its inverse.
## Main statements
* `Rack.EnvelGroup` is left adjoint to `Quandle.Conj` (`toEnvelGroup.map`).
The universality statements are `toEnvelGroup.univ` and `toEnvelGroup.univ_uniq`.
## Implementation notes
"Unital racks" are uninteresting (see `Rack.assoc_iff_id`, `UnitalShelf.assoc`), so we do not
define them.
## Notation
The following notation is localized in `quandles`:
* `x ◃ y` is `Shelf.act x y`
* `x ◃⁻¹ y` is `Rack.inv_act x y`
* `S →◃ S'` is `ShelfHom S S'`
Use `open quandles` to use these.
## Todo
* If `g` is the Lie algebra of a Lie group `G`, then `(x ◃ y) = Ad (exp x) x` forms a quandle.
* If `X` is a symmetric space, then each point has a corresponding involution that acts on `X`,
forming a quandle.
* Alexander quandle with `a ◃ b = t * b + (1 - t) * b`, with `a` and `b` elements
of a module over `Z[t,t⁻¹]`.
* If `G` is a group, `H` a subgroup, and `z` in `H`, then there is a quandle `(G/H;z)` defined by
`yH ◃ xH = yzy⁻¹xH`. Every homogeneous quandle (i.e., a quandle `Q` whose automorphism group acts
transitively on `Q` as a set) is isomorphic to such a quandle.
There is a generalization to this arbitrary quandles in [Joyce's paper (Theorem 7.2)][Joyce1982].
## Tags
rack, quandle
-/
open MulOpposite
universe u v
/-- A *Shelf* is a structure with a self-distributive binary operation.
The binary operation is regarded as a left action of the type on itself.
-/
class Shelf (α : Type u) where
/-- The action of the `Shelf` over `α`-/
act : α → α → α
/-- A verification that `act` is self-distributive-/
self_distrib : ∀ {x y z : α}, act x (act y z) = act (act x y) (act x z)
#align shelf Shelf
/--
A *unital shelf* is a shelf equipped with an element `1` such that, for all elements `x`,
we have both `x ◃ 1` and `1 ◃ x` equal `x`.
-/
class UnitalShelf (α : Type u) extends Shelf α, One α :=
(one_act : ∀ a : α, act 1 a = a)
(act_one : ∀ a : α, act a 1 = a)
#align unital_shelf UnitalShelf
/-- The type of homomorphisms between shelves.
This is also the notion of rack and quandle homomorphisms.
-/
@[ext]
structure ShelfHom (S₁ : Type*) (S₂ : Type*) [Shelf S₁] [Shelf S₂] where
/-- The function under the Shelf Homomorphism -/
toFun : S₁ → S₂
/-- The homomorphism property of a Shelf Homomorphism-/
map_act' : ∀ {x y : S₁}, toFun (Shelf.act x y) = Shelf.act (toFun x) (toFun y)
#align shelf_hom ShelfHom
#align shelf_hom.ext_iff ShelfHom.ext_iff
#align shelf_hom.ext ShelfHom.ext
/-- A *rack* is an automorphic set (a set with an action on itself by
bijections) that is self-distributive. It is a shelf such that each
element's action is invertible.
The notations `x ◃ y` and `x ◃⁻¹ y` denote the action and the
inverse action, respectively, and they are right associative.
-/
class Rack (α : Type u) extends Shelf α where
/-- The inverse actions of the elements -/
invAct : α → α → α
/-- Proof of left inverse -/
left_inv : ∀ x, Function.LeftInverse (invAct x) (act x)
/-- Proof of right inverse -/
right_inv : ∀ x, Function.RightInverse (invAct x) (act x)
#align rack Rack
/-- Action of a Shelf-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃ " => Shelf.act
/-- Inverse Action of a Rack-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃⁻¹ " => Rack.invAct
/-- Shelf Homomorphism-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:25 " →◃ " => ShelfHom
open Quandles
namespace UnitalShelf
open Shelf
variable {S : Type*} [UnitalShelf S]
/--
A monoid is *graphic* if, for all `x` and `y`, the *graphic identity*
`(x * y) * x = x * y` holds. For a unital shelf, this graphic
identity holds.
-/
lemma act_act_self_eq (x y : S) : (x ◃ y) ◃ x = x ◃ y := by
have h : (x ◃ y) ◃ x = (x ◃ y) ◃ (x ◃ 1) := by rw [act_one]
rw [h, ← Shelf.self_distrib, act_one]
#align unital_shelf.act_act_self_eq UnitalShelf.act_act_self_eq
lemma act_idem (x : S) : (x ◃ x) = x := by rw [← act_one x, ← Shelf.self_distrib, act_one]
#align unital_shelf.act_idem UnitalShelf.act_idem
lemma act_self_act_eq (x y : S) : x ◃ (x ◃ y) = x ◃ y := by
have h : x ◃ (x ◃ y) = (x ◃ 1) ◃ (x ◃ y) := by rw [act_one]
rw [h, ← Shelf.self_distrib, one_act]
#align unital_shelf.act_self_act_eq UnitalShelf.act_self_act_eq
/--
The associativity of a unital shelf comes for free.
-/
lemma assoc (x y z : S) : (x ◃ y) ◃ z = x ◃ y ◃ z := by
rw [self_distrib, self_distrib, act_act_self_eq, act_self_act_eq]
#align unital_shelf.assoc UnitalShelf.assoc
end UnitalShelf
namespace Rack
variable {R : Type*} [Rack R]
-- Porting note: No longer a need for `Rack.self_distrib`
export Shelf (self_distrib)
-- porting note, changed name to `act'` to not conflict with `Shelf.act`
/-- A rack acts on itself by equivalences.
-/
def act' (x : R) : R ≃ R where
toFun := Shelf.act x
invFun := invAct x
left_inv := left_inv x
right_inv := right_inv x
#align rack.act Rack.act'
@[simp]
theorem act'_apply (x y : R) : act' x y = x ◃ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_apply Rack.act'_apply
@[simp]
theorem act'_symm_apply (x y : R) : (act' x).symm y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_symm_apply Rack.act'_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_apply (x y : R) : (act' x)⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.inv_act_apply Rack.invAct_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_act_eq (x y : R) : x ◃⁻¹ x ◃ y = y :=
left_inv x y
#align rack.inv_act_act_eq Rack.invAct_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem act_invAct_eq (x y : R) : x ◃ x ◃⁻¹ y = y :=
right_inv x y
#align rack.act_inv_act_eq Rack.act_invAct_eq
theorem left_cancel (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃ y = x ◃ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel Rack.left_cancel
theorem left_cancel_inv (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).symm.injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel_inv Rack.left_cancel_inv
theorem self_distrib_inv {x y z : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y ◃⁻¹ z = (x ◃⁻¹ y) ◃⁻¹ x ◃⁻¹ z := by
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃⁻¹ y), right_inv, ← left_cancel x, right_inv, self_distrib]
repeat' rw [right_inv]
#align rack.self_distrib_inv Rack.self_distrib_inv
/-- The *adjoint action* of a rack on itself is `op'`, and the adjoint
action of `x ◃ y` is the conjugate of the action of `y` by the action
of `x`. It is another way to understand the self-distributivity axiom.
This is used in the natural rack homomorphism `toConj` from `R` to
`Conj (R ≃ R)` defined by `op'`.
-/
theorem ad_conj {R : Type*} [Rack R] (x y : R) : act' (x ◃ y) = act' x * act' y * (act' x)⁻¹ := by
rw [eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]; ext z
apply self_distrib.symm
#align rack.ad_conj Rack.ad_conj
/-- The opposite rack, swapping the roles of `◃` and `◃⁻¹`.
-/
instance oppositeRack : Rack Rᵐᵒᵖ where
act x y := op (invAct (unop x) (unop y))
self_distrib := by
intro x y z
induction x using MulOpposite.rec'
induction y using MulOpposite.rec'
induction z using MulOpposite.rec'
simp only [op_inj, unop_op, op_unop]
rw [self_distrib_inv]
invAct x y := op (Shelf.act (unop x) (unop y))
left_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
right_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
#align rack.opposite_rack Rack.oppositeRack
@[simp]
theorem op_act_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃ op y = op (x ◃⁻¹ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_act_op_eq Rack.op_act_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem op_invAct_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃⁻¹ op y = op (x ◃ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_inv_act_op_eq Rack.op_invAct_op_eq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quandle.lean | 283 | 283 | theorem self_act_act_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃ y = x ◃ y := by | rw [← right_inv x y, ← self_distrib]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Ray
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
#align_import analysis.convex.segment from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c5773405394e073885e2a144c9ca14637e8eb963"
/-!
# Segments in vector spaces
In a 𝕜-vector space, we define the following objects and properties.
* `segment 𝕜 x y`: Closed segment joining `x` and `y`.
* `openSegment 𝕜 x y`: Open segment joining `x` and `y`.
## Notations
We provide the following notation:
* `[x -[𝕜] y] = segment 𝕜 x y` in locale `Convex`
## TODO
Generalize all this file to affine spaces.
Should we rename `segment` and `openSegment` to `convex.Icc` and `convex.Ioo`? Should we also
define `clopenSegment`/`convex.Ico`/`convex.Ioc`?
-/
variable {𝕜 E F G ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
open Function Set
open Pointwise Convex
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} {x y : E}
/-- Segments in a vector space. -/
def segment (x y : E) : Set E :=
{ z : E | ∃ a b : 𝕜, 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∧ a + b = 1 ∧ a • x + b • y = z }
#align segment segment
/-- Open segment in a vector space. Note that `openSegment 𝕜 x x = {x}` instead of being `∅` when
the base semiring has some element between `0` and `1`. -/
def openSegment (x y : E) : Set E :=
{ z : E | ∃ a b : 𝕜, 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ a + b = 1 ∧ a • x + b • y = z }
#align open_segment openSegment
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Convex] notation (priority := high) "[" x "-[" 𝕜 "]" y "]" => segment 𝕜 x y
theorem segment_eq_image₂ (x y : E) :
[x -[𝕜] y] =
(fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => p.1 • x + p.2 • y) '' { p | 0 ≤ p.1 ∧ 0 ≤ p.2 ∧ p.1 + p.2 = 1 } := by
simp only [segment, image, Prod.exists, mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc]
#align segment_eq_image₂ segment_eq_image₂
theorem openSegment_eq_image₂ (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y =
(fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => p.1 • x + p.2 • y) '' { p | 0 < p.1 ∧ 0 < p.2 ∧ p.1 + p.2 = 1 } := by
simp only [openSegment, image, Prod.exists, mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc]
#align open_segment_eq_image₂ openSegment_eq_image₂
theorem segment_symm (x y : E) : [x -[𝕜] y] = [y -[𝕜] x] :=
Set.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ => ⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ =>
⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩⟩
#align segment_symm segment_symm
theorem openSegment_symm (x y : E) : openSegment 𝕜 x y = openSegment 𝕜 y x :=
Set.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ => ⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ =>
⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩⟩
#align open_segment_symm openSegment_symm
theorem openSegment_subset_segment (x y : E) : openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ [x -[𝕜] y] :=
fun _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha.le, hb.le, hab, hz⟩
#align open_segment_subset_segment openSegment_subset_segment
theorem segment_subset_iff :
[x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a b : 𝕜, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s :=
⟨fun H a b ha hb hab => H ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩, fun H _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
hz ▸ H a b ha hb hab⟩
#align segment_subset_iff segment_subset_iff
theorem openSegment_subset_iff :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a b : 𝕜, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s :=
⟨fun H a b ha hb hab => H ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩, fun H _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
hz ▸ H a b ha hb hab⟩
#align open_segment_subset_iff openSegment_subset_iff
end SMul
open Convex
section MulActionWithZero
variable (𝕜)
variable [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 E]
theorem left_mem_segment (x y : E) : x ∈ [x -[𝕜] y] :=
⟨1, 0, zero_le_one, le_refl 0, add_zero 1, by rw [zero_smul, one_smul, add_zero]⟩
#align left_mem_segment left_mem_segment
theorem right_mem_segment (x y : E) : y ∈ [x -[𝕜] y] :=
segment_symm 𝕜 y x ▸ left_mem_segment 𝕜 y x
#align right_mem_segment right_mem_segment
end MulActionWithZero
section Module
variable (𝕜)
variable [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} {x y z : E}
@[simp]
theorem segment_same (x : E) : [x -[𝕜] x] = {x} :=
Set.ext fun z =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, _, _, hab, hz⟩ => by
simpa only [(add_smul _ _ _).symm, mem_singleton_iff, hab, one_smul, eq_comm] using hz,
fun h => mem_singleton_iff.1 h ▸ left_mem_segment 𝕜 z z⟩
#align segment_same segment_same
theorem insert_endpoints_openSegment (x y : E) :
insert x (insert y (openSegment 𝕜 x y)) = [x -[𝕜] y] := by
simp only [subset_antisymm_iff, insert_subset_iff, left_mem_segment, right_mem_segment,
openSegment_subset_segment, true_and_iff]
rintro z ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
refine hb.eq_or_gt.imp ?_ fun hb' => ha.eq_or_gt.imp ?_ fun ha' => ?_
· rintro rfl
rw [← add_zero a, hab, one_smul, zero_smul, add_zero]
· rintro rfl
rw [← zero_add b, hab, one_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
· exact ⟨a, b, ha', hb', hab, rfl⟩
#align insert_endpoints_open_segment insert_endpoints_openSegment
variable {𝕜}
theorem mem_openSegment_of_ne_left_right (hx : x ≠ z) (hy : y ≠ z) (hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) :
z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y := by
rw [← insert_endpoints_openSegment] at hz
exact (hz.resolve_left hx.symm).resolve_left hy.symm
#align mem_open_segment_of_ne_left_right mem_openSegment_of_ne_left_right
theorem openSegment_subset_iff_segment_subset (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s ↔ [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s := by
simp only [← insert_endpoints_openSegment, insert_subset_iff, *, true_and_iff]
#align open_segment_subset_iff_segment_subset openSegment_subset_iff_segment_subset
end Module
end OrderedSemiring
open Convex
section OrderedRing
variable (𝕜) [OrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [AddCommGroup G] [Module 𝕜 E]
[Module 𝕜 F]
section DenselyOrdered
variable [Nontrivial 𝕜] [DenselyOrdered 𝕜]
@[simp]
theorem openSegment_same (x : E) : openSegment 𝕜 x x = {x} :=
Set.ext fun z =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, _, _, hab, hz⟩ => by
simpa only [← add_smul, mem_singleton_iff, hab, one_smul, eq_comm] using hz,
fun h : z = x => by
obtain ⟨a, ha₀, ha₁⟩ := DenselyOrdered.dense (0 : 𝕜) 1 zero_lt_one
refine ⟨a, 1 - a, ha₀, sub_pos_of_lt ha₁, add_sub_cancel _ _, ?_⟩
rw [← add_smul, add_sub_cancel, one_smul, h]⟩
#align open_segment_same openSegment_same
end DenselyOrdered
theorem segment_eq_image (x y : E) :
[x -[𝕜] y] = (fun θ : 𝕜 => (1 - θ) • x + θ • y) '' Icc (0 : 𝕜) 1 :=
Set.ext fun z =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
⟨b, ⟨hb, hab ▸ le_add_of_nonneg_left ha⟩, hab ▸ hz ▸ by simp only [add_sub_cancel_right]⟩,
fun ⟨θ, ⟨hθ₀, hθ₁⟩, hz⟩ => ⟨1 - θ, θ, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₁, hθ₀, sub_add_cancel _ _, hz⟩⟩
#align segment_eq_image segment_eq_image
theorem openSegment_eq_image (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y = (fun θ : 𝕜 => (1 - θ) • x + θ • y) '' Ioo (0 : 𝕜) 1 :=
Set.ext fun z =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
⟨b, ⟨hb, hab ▸ lt_add_of_pos_left _ ha⟩, hab ▸ hz ▸ by simp only [add_sub_cancel_right]⟩,
fun ⟨θ, ⟨hθ₀, hθ₁⟩, hz⟩ => ⟨1 - θ, θ, sub_pos.2 hθ₁, hθ₀, sub_add_cancel _ _, hz⟩⟩
#align open_segment_eq_image openSegment_eq_image
theorem segment_eq_image' (x y : E) :
[x -[𝕜] y] = (fun θ : 𝕜 => x + θ • (y - x)) '' Icc (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by
convert segment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
simp only [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
abel
#align segment_eq_image' segment_eq_image'
theorem openSegment_eq_image' (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y = (fun θ : 𝕜 => x + θ • (y - x)) '' Ioo (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by
convert openSegment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
simp only [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
abel
#align open_segment_eq_image' openSegment_eq_image'
theorem segment_eq_image_lineMap (x y : E) : [x -[𝕜] y] =
AffineMap.lineMap x y '' Icc (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by
convert segment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
exact AffineMap.lineMap_apply_module _ _ _
#align segment_eq_image_line_map segment_eq_image_lineMap
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Segment.lean | 227 | 230 | theorem openSegment_eq_image_lineMap (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y = AffineMap.lineMap x y '' Ioo (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by |
convert openSegment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
exact AffineMap.lineMap_apply_module _ _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import group_theory.subgroup.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
/-!
# Subgroups
This file defines multiplicative and additive subgroups as an extension of submonoids, in a bundled
form (unbundled subgroups are in `Deprecated/Subgroups.lean`).
We prove subgroups of a group form a complete lattice, and results about images and preimages of
subgroups under group homomorphisms. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid homomorphisms.
There are also theorems about the subgroups generated by an element or a subset of a group,
defined both inductively and as the infimum of the set of subgroups containing a given
element/subset.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup G` : the type of subgroups of a group `G`
* `AddSubgroup A` : the type of subgroups of an additive group `A`
* `CompleteLattice (Subgroup G)` : the subgroups of `G` form a complete lattice
* `Subgroup.closure k` : the minimal subgroup that includes the set `k`
* `Subgroup.subtype` : the natural group homomorphism from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`
* `Subgroup.gi` : `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set
* `Subgroup.comap H f` : the preimage of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.map f H` : the image of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
* `MonoidHom.range f` : the range of the group homomorphism `f` is a subgroup
* `MonoidHom.ker f` : the kernel of a group homomorphism `f` is the subgroup of elements `x : G`
such that `f x = 1`
* `MonoidHom.eq_locus f g` : given group homomorphisms `f`, `g`, the elements of `G` such that
`f x = g x` form a subgroup of `G`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
open Function
open Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
/-- `InvMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under inverses. -/
class InvMemClass (S G : Type*) [Inv G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s
#align inv_mem_class InvMemClass
export InvMemClass (inv_mem)
/-- `NegMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under negation. -/
class NegMemClass (S G : Type*) [Neg G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → -x ∈ s
#align neg_mem_class NegMemClass
export NegMemClass (neg_mem)
/-- `SubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are subgroups of `G`. -/
class SubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends SubmonoidClass S G,
InvMemClass S G : Prop
#align subgroup_class SubgroupClass
/-- `AddSubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are
additive subgroups of `G`. -/
class AddSubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [SubNegMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends AddSubmonoidClass S G,
NegMemClass S G : Prop
#align add_subgroup_class AddSubgroupClass
attribute [to_additive] InvMemClass SubgroupClass
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] inv_mem neg_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mem_iff {S G} [InvolutiveInv G] {_ : SetLike S G} [InvMemClass S G] {H : S}
{x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ inv_mem h, inv_mem⟩
#align inv_mem_iff inv_mem_iff
#align neg_mem_iff neg_mem_iff
@[simp] theorem abs_mem_iff {S G} [AddGroup G] [LinearOrder G] {_ : SetLike S G}
[NegMemClass S G] {H : S} {x : G} : |x| ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H := by
cases abs_choice x <;> simp [*]
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"An additive subgroup is closed under subtraction."]
theorem div_mem {x y : M} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact mul_mem hx (inv_mem hy)
#align div_mem div_mem
#align sub_mem sub_mem
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))]
theorem zpow_mem {x : M} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K
| (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact pow_mem hx n
| -[n+1] => by
rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact inv_mem (pow_mem hx n.succ)
#align zpow_mem zpow_mem
#align zsmul_mem zsmul_mem
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
#align div_mem_comm_iff div_mem_comm_iff
#align sub_mem_comm_iff sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive /-(attr := simp)-/] -- Porting note: `simp` cannot simplify LHS
theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ H ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, P x := by
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, inv_mem x_in, by simp [hx]⟩
#align exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hba => by simpa using mul_mem hba (inv_mem h), fun hb => mul_mem hb h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_right mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_mem_cancel_right add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hab => by simpa using mul_mem (inv_mem h) hab, mul_mem h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_left mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_mem_cancel_left add_mem_cancel_left
namespace InvMemClass
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [Inv G] [SetLike S G]
[InvMemClass S G] {H : S} : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_inv InvMemClass.inv
#align add_subgroup_class.has_neg NegMemClass.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : (x⁻¹).1 = x.1⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_inv InvMemClass.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_neg NegMemClass.coe_neg
end InvMemClass
namespace SubgroupClass
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-15"))] alias coe_inv := InvMemClass.coe_inv
-- Here we assume H, K, and L are subgroups, but in fact any one of them
-- could be allowed to be a subsemigroup.
-- Counterexample where K and L are submonoids: H = ℤ, K = ℕ, L = -ℕ
-- Counterexample where H and K are submonoids: H = {n | n = 0 ∨ 3 ≤ n}, K = 3ℕ + 4ℕ, L = 5ℤ
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_union {H K L : S} : (H : Set G) ⊆ K ∪ L ↔ H ≤ K ∨ H ≤ L := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h x xH ↦ h.imp (· xH) (· xH)⟩
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists]
exact fun ⟨x, xH, xK⟩ y yH ↦ (h <| mul_mem xH yH).elim
((h yH).resolve_left fun yK ↦ xK <| (mul_mem_cancel_right yK).mp ·)
(mul_mem_cancel_left <| (h xH).resolve_left xK).mp
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G]
[SubgroupClass S G] {H : S} : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_div SubgroupClass.div
#align add_subgroup_class.has_sub AddSubgroupClass.sub
/-- An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroupClass.zsmul {M S} [SubNegMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a.1, zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup_class.has_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power. -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow {M S} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [SubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a.1 ^ n, zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_zpow SubgroupClass.zpow
-- Porting note: additive align statement is given above
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (x / y).1 = x.1 / y.1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_div SubgroupClass.coe_div
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_sub AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub
variable (H)
-- Prefer subclasses of `Group` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance (priority := 75) toGroup : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_group SubgroupClass.toGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddGroup
-- Prefer subclasses of `CommGroup` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance (priority := 75) toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] :
CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_comm_group SubgroupClass.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"The natural group hom from an additive subgroup of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.subtype SubgroupClass.subtype
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype AddSubgroupClass.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : (SubgroupClass.subtype H : H → G) = ((↑) : H → G) := by
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_subtype SubgroupClass.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_subtype AddSubgroupClass.coeSubtype
variable {H}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_pow SubgroupClass.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_smul AddSubgroupClass.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_zpow SubgroupClass.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.coe_zsmul
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : S} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.prop⟩) fun _ _=> rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion AddSubgroupClass.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_self (x : H) : inclusion le_rfl x = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_self SubgroupClass.inclusion_self
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_self AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_mk {h : H ≤ K} (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = ⟨x, h hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_mk SubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_mk AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_right (h : H ≤ K) (x : K) (hx : (x : G) ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_right SubgroupClass.inclusion_right
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_right AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_right
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_inclusion {L : S} (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) (x : H) :
inclusion hKL (inclusion hHK x) = inclusion (hHK.trans hKL) x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : S} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup_class.coe_inclusion SubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : S} (hH : H ≤ K) :
(SubgroupClass.subtype K).comp (inclusion hH) = SubgroupClass.subtype H := by
ext
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, coeSubtype, coe_inclusion]
#align subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion SubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
end SubgroupClass
end SubgroupClass
/-- A subgroup of a group `G` is a subset containing 1, closed under multiplication
and closed under multiplicative inverse. -/
structure Subgroup (G : Type*) [Group G] extends Submonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align subgroup Subgroup
/-- An additive subgroup of an additive group `G` is a subset containing 0, closed
under addition and additive inverse. -/
structure AddSubgroup (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddSubmonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → -x ∈ carrier
#align add_subgroup AddSubgroup
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup
-- Porting note: Removed, translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid] Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `Subgroup` as a `Submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subgroup.toSubmonoid
#align subgroup.to_submonoid Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret an `AddSubgroup` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (Subgroup G) G where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hp,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := p
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hq,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := q
congr
-- Porting note: Below can probably be written more uniformly
@[to_additive]
instance : SubgroupClass (Subgroup G) G where
inv_mem := Subgroup.inv_mem' _
one_mem _ := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).one_mem'
mul_mem := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).mul_mem'
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_carrier Subgroup.mem_carrier
#align add_subgroup.mem_carrier AddSubgroup.mem_carrier
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mk {s : Set G} {x : G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
x ∈ mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_mk Subgroup.mem_mk
#align add_subgroup.mem_mk AddSubgroup.mem_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_set_mk {s : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
(mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_set_mk Subgroup.coe_set_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_set_mk AddSubgroup.coe_set_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_le_mk {s t : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) (h_one') (h_mul') (h_inv') :
mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ≤ mk ⟨⟨t, h_one'⟩, h_mul'⟩ h_inv' ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mk_le_mk Subgroup.mk_le_mk
#align add_subgroup.mk_le_mk AddSubgroup.mk_le_mk
initialize_simps_projections Subgroup (carrier → coe)
initialize_simps_projections AddSubgroup (carrier → coe)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) : (K.toSubmonoid : Set G) = K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_to_submonoid Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.coe_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.coe_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) (x : G) : x ∈ K.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_to_submonoid Subgroup.mem_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.mem_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.mem_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
-- fun p q h => SetLike.ext'_iff.2 (show _ from SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h)
fun p q h => by
have := SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h
rw [coe_toSubmonoid, coe_toSubmonoid] at this
exact SetLike.ext'_iff.2 this
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_injective Subgroup.toSubmonoid_injective
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_injective AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_eq {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid = q.toSubmonoid ↔ p = q :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_eq Subgroup.toSubmonoid_eq
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_eq AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_eq
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) := fun _ _ =>
id
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_strictMono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_mono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_mono
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_le {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid ≤ q.toSubmonoid ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_le Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_le AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_nonempty (s : Subgroup G) : (s : Set G).Nonempty := ⟨1, one_mem _⟩
end Subgroup
/-!
### Conversion to/from `Additive`/`Multiplicative`
-/
section mul_add
/-- Subgroups of a group `G` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `Additive G`. -/
@[simps!]
def Subgroup.toAddSubgroup : Subgroup G ≃o AddSubgroup (Additive G) where
toFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
invFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup Subgroup.toAddSubgroup
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_apply_coe
/-- Additive subgroup of an additive group `Additive G` are isomorphic to subgroup of `G`. -/
abbrev AddSubgroup.toSubgroup' : AddSubgroup (Additive G) ≃o Subgroup G :=
Subgroup.toAddSubgroup.symm
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup' AddSubgroup.toSubgroup'
/-- Additive subgroups of an additive group `A` are isomorphic to subgroups of `Multiplicative A`.
-/
@[simps!]
def AddSubgroup.toSubgroup : AddSubgroup A ≃o Subgroup (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
invFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup AddSubgroup.toSubgroup
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
/-- Subgroups of an additive group `Multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `A`.
-/
abbrev Subgroup.toAddSubgroup' : Subgroup (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubgroup A :=
AddSubgroup.toSubgroup.symm
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup' Subgroup.toAddSubgroup'
end mul_add
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
/-- Copy of a subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an additive subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities"]
protected def copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = K) : Subgroup G where
carrier := s
one_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.one_mem'
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.mul_mem'
inv_mem' hx := by simpa [hs] using hx -- Porting note: `▸` didn't work here
#align subgroup.copy Subgroup.copy
#align add_subgroup.copy AddSubgroup.copy
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : (K.copy s hs : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_copy Subgroup.coe_copy
#align add_subgroup.coe_copy AddSubgroup.coe_copy
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : K.copy s hs = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subgroup.copy_eq Subgroup.copy_eq
#align add_subgroup.copy_eq AddSubgroup.copy_eq
/-- Two subgroups are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two `AddSubgroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {H K : Subgroup G} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ H ↔ x ∈ K) : H = K :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subgroup.ext Subgroup.ext
#align add_subgroup.ext AddSubgroup.ext
/-- A subgroup contains the group's 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` contains the group's 0."]
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ H :=
one_mem _
#align subgroup.one_mem Subgroup.one_mem
#align add_subgroup.zero_mem AddSubgroup.zero_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under addition."]
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : G} : x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H :=
mul_mem
#align subgroup.mul_mem Subgroup.mul_mem
#align add_subgroup.add_mem AddSubgroup.add_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under inverse."]
protected theorem inv_mem {x : G} : x ∈ H → x⁻¹ ∈ H :=
inv_mem
#align subgroup.inv_mem Subgroup.inv_mem
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem AddSubgroup.neg_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under subtraction."]
protected theorem div_mem {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H :=
div_mem hx hy
#align subgroup.div_mem Subgroup.div_mem
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem AddSubgroup.sub_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_mem_iff {x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
inv_mem_iff
#align subgroup.inv_mem_iff Subgroup.inv_mem_iff
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem_iff AddSubgroup.neg_mem_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
#align subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff Subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff AddSubgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem (K : Subgroup G) {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ K ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, P x :=
exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem Subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align add_subgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem AddSubgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_right h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_right AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_left h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_left AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem pow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
pow_mem hx
#align subgroup.pow_mem Subgroup.pow_mem
#align add_subgroup.nsmul_mem AddSubgroup.nsmul_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem zpow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
zpow_mem hx
#align subgroup.zpow_mem Subgroup.zpow_mem
#align add_subgroup.zsmul_mem AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem
/-- Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under subtraction"]
def ofDiv (s : Set G) (hsn : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x * y⁻¹ ∈ s) :
Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s := by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hsn
simpa using hs x hx x hx
have inv_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s := fun x hx => by simpa using hs 1 one_mem x hx
{ carrier := s
one_mem' := one_mem
inv_mem' := inv_mem _
mul_mem' := fun hx hy => by simpa using hs _ hx _ (inv_mem _ hy) }
#align subgroup.of_div Subgroup.ofDiv
#align add_subgroup.of_sub AddSubgroup.ofSub
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an addition."]
instance mul : Mul H :=
H.toSubmonoid.mul
#align subgroup.has_mul Subgroup.mul
#align add_subgroup.has_add AddSubgroup.add
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a zero."]
instance one : One H :=
H.toSubmonoid.one
#align subgroup.has_one Subgroup.one
#align add_subgroup.has_zero AddSubgroup.zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, H.inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_inv Subgroup.inv
#align add_subgroup.has_neg AddSubgroup.neg
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, H.div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_div Subgroup.div
#align add_subgroup.has_sub AddSubgroup.sub
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a natural scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.nsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℕ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.nsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_nsmul AddSubgroup.nsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a natural power -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected instance npow : Pow H ℕ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.pow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_npow Subgroup.npow
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.zsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_zsmul AddSubgroup.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_zpow Subgroup.zpow
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul (x y : H) : (↑(x * y) : G) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mul Subgroup.coe_mul
#align add_subgroup.coe_add AddSubgroup.coe_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : H) : G) = 1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_one Subgroup.coe_one
#align add_subgroup.coe_zero AddSubgroup.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : ↑(x⁻¹ : H) = (x⁻¹ : G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inv Subgroup.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup.coe_neg AddSubgroup.coe_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (↑(x / y) : G) = ↑x / ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_div Subgroup.coe_div
#align add_subgroup.coe_sub AddSubgroup.coe_sub
-- Porting note: removed simp, theorem has variable as head symbol
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mk (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : ((⟨x, hx⟩ : H) : G) = x :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mk Subgroup.coe_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_mk AddSubgroup.coe_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_pow Subgroup.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup.coe_nsmul AddSubgroup.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_zpow Subgroup.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup.coe_zsmul AddSubgroup.coe_zsmul
@[to_additive] -- This can be proved by `Submonoid.mk_eq_one`
theorem mk_eq_one {g : G} {h} : (⟨g, h⟩ : H) = 1 ↔ g = 1 := by simp
#align subgroup.mk_eq_one_iff Subgroup.mk_eq_one
#align add_subgroup.mk_eq_zero_iff AddSubgroup.mk_eq_zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance toGroup {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_group Subgroup.toGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_group AddSubgroup.toAddGroup
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (H : Subgroup G) : CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_comm_group Subgroup.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroup.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural group hom from an `AddSubgroup` of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align subgroup.subtype Subgroup.subtype
#align add_subgroup.subtype AddSubgroup.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : ⇑ H.subtype = ((↑) : H → G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_subtype Subgroup.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup.coe_subtype AddSubgroup.coeSubtype
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_injective : Function.Injective (Subgroup.subtype H) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.subtype_injective Subgroup.subtype_injective
#align add_subgroup.subtype_injective AddSubgroup.subtype_injective
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.2⟩) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.inclusion Subgroup.inclusion
#align add_subgroup.inclusion AddSubgroup.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, coe_mk, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup.coe_inclusion Subgroup.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.coe_inclusion AddSubgroup.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_injective {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : Function.Injective <| inclusion h :=
Set.inclusion_injective h
#align subgroup.inclusion_injective Subgroup.inclusion_injective
#align add_subgroup.inclusion_injective AddSubgroup.inclusion_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : H ≤ K) :
K.subtype.comp (inclusion hH) = H.subtype :=
rfl
#align subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion Subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
/-- The subgroup `G` of the group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup G` of the `AddGroup G`."]
instance : Top (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := fun _ => Set.mem_univ _ }⟩
/-- The top subgroup is isomorphic to the group.
This is the group version of `Submonoid.topEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!)
"The top additive subgroup is isomorphic to the additive group.
This is the additive group version of `AddSubmonoid.topEquiv`."]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgroup G) ≃* G :=
Submonoid.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv Subgroup.topEquiv
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv AddSubgroup.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_apply AddSubgroup.topEquiv_apply
/-- The trivial subgroup `{1}` of a group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial `AddSubgroup` `{0}` of an `AddGroup` `G`."]
instance : Bot (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := by simp}⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_bot {x : G} : x ∈ (⊥ : Subgroup G) ↔ x = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_bot Subgroup.mem_bot
#align add_subgroup.mem_bot AddSubgroup.mem_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_top (x : G) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subgroup.mem_top Subgroup.mem_top
#align add_subgroup.mem_top AddSubgroup.mem_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_top Subgroup.coe_top
#align add_subgroup.coe_top AddSubgroup.coe_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = {1} :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_bot Subgroup.coe_bot
#align add_subgroup.coe_bot AddSubgroup.coe_bot
@[to_additive]
instance : Unique (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨1⟩, fun g => Subtype.ext g.2⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_toSubmonoid : (⊤ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.top_to_submonoid Subgroup.top_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.top_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.top_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_toSubmonoid : (⊥ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.bot_to_submonoid Subgroup.bot_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.bot_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.bot_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_iff_forall : H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ H, x = (1 : G) :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff.symm.trans <| Submonoid.eq_bot_iff_forall _
#align subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall AddSubgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton H] : H = ⊥ := by
rw [Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall]
intro y hy
rw [← Subgroup.coe_mk H y hy, Subsingleton.elim (⟨y, hy⟩ : H) 1, Subgroup.coe_one]
#align subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton Subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton AddSubgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_eq_univ {H : Subgroup G} : (H : Set G) = Set.univ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
(SetLike.ext'_iff.trans (by rfl)).symm
#align subgroup.coe_eq_univ Subgroup.coe_eq_univ
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_univ AddSubgroup.coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {H : Subgroup G} : (∃ g : G, (H : Set G) = {g}) ↔ H = ⊥ :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hg⟩ =>
haveI : Subsingleton (H : Set G) := by
rw [hg]
infer_instance
H.eq_bot_of_subsingleton,
fun h => ⟨1, SetLike.ext'_iff.mp h⟩⟩
#align subgroup.coe_eq_singleton Subgroup.coe_eq_singleton
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_singleton AddSubgroup.coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
rw [Subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (fun x => x ∈ H) (1 : H)]
simp
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) [Nontrivial H] :
∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ 1 := by
rwa [← Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ H ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one, ne_eq, eq_bot_iff_forall]
simp only [ne_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial."]
theorem bot_or_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ Nontrivial H := by
have := nontrivial_iff_ne_bot H
tauto
#align subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial Subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial AddSubgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a non-identity element. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a nonzero element."]
theorem bot_or_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
convert H.bot_or_nontrivial
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
#align subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one Subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
lemma ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one {H : Subgroup G} : H ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ a : ↥H, a ≠ 1 := by
rw [← nontrivial_iff_ne_bot, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
simp only [ne_eq, Subtype.exists, mk_eq_one, exists_prop]
/-- The inf of two subgroups is their intersection. -/
@[to_additive "The inf of two `AddSubgroup`s is their intersection."]
instance : Inf (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun H₁ H₂ =>
{ H₁.toSubmonoid ⊓ H₂.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun ⟨hx, hx'⟩ => ⟨H₁.inv_mem hx, H₂.inv_mem hx'⟩ }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subgroup G) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subgroup G) : Set G) = (p : Set G) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inf Subgroup.coe_inf
#align add_subgroup.coe_inf AddSubgroup.coe_inf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_inf Subgroup.mem_inf
#align add_subgroup.mem_inf AddSubgroup.mem_inf
@[to_additive]
instance : InfSet (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ (⨅ S ∈ s, Subgroup.toSubmonoid S).copy (⋂ S ∈ s, ↑S) (by simp) with
inv_mem' := fun {x} hx =>
Set.mem_biInter fun i h => i.inv_mem (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hx i h) }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_sInf (H : Set (Subgroup G)) : ((sInf H : Subgroup G) : Set G) = ⋂ s ∈ H, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_Inf Subgroup.coe_sInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_Inf AddSubgroup.coe_sInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {x : G} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subgroup.mem_Inf Subgroup.mem_sInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_Inf AddSubgroup.mem_sInf
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} {x : G} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align subgroup.mem_infi Subgroup.mem_iInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_infi AddSubgroup.mem_iInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set G) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
#align subgroup.coe_infi Subgroup.coe_iInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_infi AddSubgroup.coe_iInf
/-- Subgroups of a group form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup`s of an `AddGroup` form a complete lattice."]
instance : CompleteLattice (Subgroup G) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subgroup G) fun _s =>
IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun S _x hx => (mem_bot.1 hx).symm ▸ S.one_mem
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _S x _hx => mem_top x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _a _b _c ha hb _x hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _a _b _x => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _a _b _x => And.right }
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : S ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_left; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_left Subgroup.mem_sup_left
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_left AddSubgroup.mem_sup_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : T ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_right; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_right Subgroup.mem_sup_right
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_right AddSubgroup.mem_sup_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : Subgroup G} {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) : x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
(S ⊔ T).mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
#align subgroup.mul_mem_sup Subgroup.mul_mem_sup
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_sup AddSubgroup.add_mem_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ iSup S :=
have : S i ≤ iSup S := le_iSup _ _; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem Subgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sSup_of_mem {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {s : Subgroup G} (hs : s ∈ S) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ s → x ∈ sSup S :=
have : s ≤ sSup S := le_sSup hs; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem Subgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (Subgroup G) ↔ Subsingleton G :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨fun x y =>
have : ∀ i : G, i = 1 := fun i =>
mem_bot.mp <| Subsingleton.elim (⊤ : Subgroup G) ⊥ ▸ mem_top i
(this x).trans (this y).symm⟩,
fun h => ⟨fun x y => Subgroup.ext fun i => Subsingleton.elim 1 i ▸ by simp [Subgroup.one_mem]⟩⟩
#align subgroup.subsingleton_iff Subgroup.subsingleton_iff
#align add_subgroup.subsingleton_iff AddSubgroup.subsingleton_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) ↔ Nontrivial G :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff Subgroup.nontrivial_iff
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff
@[to_additive]
instance [Subsingleton G] : Unique (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨⊥⟩, fun a => @Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_iff.mpr ‹_›) a _⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [Nontrivial G] : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) :=
nontrivial_iff.mpr ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_top_iff' : H = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : G, x ∈ H :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align subgroup.eq_top_iff' Subgroup.eq_top_iff'
#align add_subgroup.eq_top_iff' AddSubgroup.eq_top_iff'
/-- The `Subgroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (k : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
sInf { K | k ⊆ K }
#align subgroup.closure Subgroup.closure
#align add_subgroup.closure AddSubgroup.closure
variable {k : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure {x : G} : x ∈ closure k ↔ ∀ K : Subgroup G, k ⊆ K → x ∈ K :=
mem_sInf
#align subgroup.mem_closure Subgroup.mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure AddSubgroup.mem_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
theorem subset_closure : k ⊆ closure k := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hK => hK hx
#align subgroup.subset_closure Subgroup.subset_closure
#align add_subgroup.subset_closure AddSubgroup.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : G} (hP : P ∉ closure k) : P ∉ k := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure Subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure AddSubgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
open Set
/-- A subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"An additive subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`"]
theorem closure_le : closure k ≤ K ↔ k ⊆ K :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align subgroup.closure_le Subgroup.closure_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_le AddSubgroup.closure_le
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : k ⊆ K) (h₂ : K ≤ closure k) : closure k = K :=
le_antisymm ((closure_le <| K).2 h₁) h₂
#align subgroup.closure_eq_of_le Subgroup.closure_eq_of_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_of_le AddSubgroup.closure_eq_of_le
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of `k`, and
is preserved under multiplication and inverse, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure
of `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p`
holds for `0` and all elements of `k`, and is preserved under addition and inverses, then `p`
holds for all elements of the additive closure of `k`."]
theorem closure_induction {p : G → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure k) (mem : ∀ x ∈ k, p x) (one : p 1)
(mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (inv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ ⟨⟨⟨setOf p, fun {x y} ↦ mul x y⟩, one⟩, fun {x} ↦ inv x⟩ k).2 mem h
#align subgroup.closure_induction Subgroup.closure_induction
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction AddSubgroup.closure_induction
/-- A dependent version of `Subgroup.closure_induction`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "A dependent version of `AddSubgroup.closure_induction`. "]
theorem closure_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure k → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ k), p x (subset_closure h)) (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(inv : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p x⁻¹ (inv_mem hx)) {x} (hx : x ∈ closure k) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hc : p x hx) => hc
exact
closure_induction hx (fun x hx => ⟨_, mem x hx⟩) ⟨_, one⟩
(fun x y ⟨hx', hx⟩ ⟨hy', hy⟩ => ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩) fun x ⟨hx', hx⟩ => ⟨_, inv _ _ hx⟩
#align subgroup.closure_induction' Subgroup.closure_induction'
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction' AddSubgroup.closure_induction'
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership, for
predicates with two arguments."]
theorem closure_induction₂ {p : G → G → Prop} {x} {y : G} (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hy : y ∈ closure k)
(Hk : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, p x y) (H1_left : ∀ x, p 1 x) (H1_right : ∀ x, p x 1)
(Hmul_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ * x₂) y)
(Hmul_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ * y₂)) (Hinv_left : ∀ x y, p x y → p x⁻¹ y)
(Hinv_right : ∀ x y, p x y → p x y⁻¹) : p x y :=
closure_induction hx
(fun x xk => closure_induction hy (Hk x xk) (H1_right x) (Hmul_right x) (Hinv_right x))
(H1_left y) (fun z z' => Hmul_left z z' y) fun z => Hinv_left z y
#align subgroup.closure_induction₂ Subgroup.closure_induction₂
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction₂ AddSubgroup.closure_induction₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_closure_coe_preimage {k : Set G} : closure (((↑) : closure k → G) ⁻¹' k) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x =>
Subtype.recOn x fun x hx _ => by
refine closure_induction' (fun g hg => ?_) ?_ (fun g₁ g₂ hg₁ hg₂ => ?_) (fun g hg => ?_) hx
· exact subset_closure hg
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem
· exact inv_mem
#align subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage Subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
#align add_subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage AddSubgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
/-- If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is a commutative group. -/
@[to_additive
"If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is an additive
commutative group."]
def closureCommGroupOfComm {k : Set G} (hcomm : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, x * y = y * x) :
CommGroup (closure k) :=
{ (closure k).toGroup with
mul_comm := fun x y => by
ext
simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul]
refine
closure_induction₂ x.prop y.prop hcomm (fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc])
(fun x y h => by
rw [inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one])
fun x y h => by
rw [mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_assoc, h, ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_self, one_mul] }
#align subgroup.closure_comm_group_of_comm Subgroup.closureCommGroupOfComm
#align add_subgroup.closure_add_comm_group_of_comm AddSubgroup.closureAddCommGroupOfComm
variable (G)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure G _) (↑) where
choice s _ := closure s
gc s t := @closure_le _ _ t s
le_l_u _s := subset_closure
choice_eq _s _h := rfl
#align subgroup.gi Subgroup.gi
#align add_subgroup.gi AddSubgroup.gi
variable {G}
/-- Subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`. -/
@[to_additive
"Additive subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`"]
theorem closure_mono ⦃h k : Set G⦄ (h' : h ⊆ k) : closure h ≤ closure k :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.monotone_l h'
#align subgroup.closure_mono Subgroup.closure_mono
#align add_subgroup.closure_mono AddSubgroup.closure_mono
/-- Closure of a subgroup `K` equals `K`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Additive closure of an additive subgroup `K` equals `K`"]
theorem closure_eq : closure (K : Set G) = K :=
(Subgroup.gi G).l_u_eq K
#align subgroup.closure_eq Subgroup.closure_eq
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq AddSubgroup.closure_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set G) = ⊥ :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_bot
#align subgroup.closure_empty Subgroup.closure_empty
#align add_subgroup.closure_empty AddSubgroup.closure_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set G) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top G _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
#align subgroup.closure_univ Subgroup.closure_univ
#align add_subgroup.closure_univ AddSubgroup.closure_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_union (s t : Set G) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_sup
#align subgroup.closure_union Subgroup.closure_union
#align add_subgroup.closure_union AddSubgroup.closure_union
@[to_additive]
theorem sup_eq_closure (H H' : Subgroup G) : H ⊔ H' = closure ((H : Set G) ∪ (H' : Set G)) := by
simp_rw [closure_union, closure_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set G) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_iSup
#align subgroup.closure_Union Subgroup.closure_iUnion
#align add_subgroup.closure_Union AddSubgroup.closure_iUnion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_eq_bot_iff : closure k = ⊥ ↔ k ⊆ {1} := le_bot_iff.symm.trans <| closure_le _
#align subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_eq_closure {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subgroup G) :
⨆ i, p i = closure (⋃ i, (p i : Set G)) := by simp_rw [closure_iUnion, closure_eq]
#align subgroup.supr_eq_closure Subgroup.iSup_eq_closure
#align add_subgroup.supr_eq_closure AddSubgroup.iSup_eq_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by an element of a group equals the set of integer number powers of
the element. -/
@[to_additive
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by an element of an `AddGroup` equals the set of
natural number multiples of the element."]
theorem mem_closure_singleton {x y : G} : y ∈ closure ({x} : Set G) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x ^ n = y := by
refine
⟨fun hy => closure_induction hy ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
hn ▸ zpow_mem (subset_closure <| mem_singleton x) n⟩
· intro y hy
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton hy]
exact ⟨1, zpow_one x⟩
· exact ⟨0, zpow_zero x⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n + m, zpow_add x n m⟩
rintro _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨-n, zpow_neg x n⟩
#align subgroup.mem_closure_singleton Subgroup.mem_closure_singleton
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure_singleton AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_singleton_one : closure ({1} : Set G) = ⊥ := by
simp [eq_bot_iff_forall, mem_closure_singleton]
#align subgroup.closure_singleton_one Subgroup.closure_singleton_one
#align add_subgroup.closure_singleton_zero AddSubgroup.closure_singleton_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem le_closure_toSubmonoid (S : Set G) : Submonoid.closure S ≤ (closure S).toSubmonoid :=
Submonoid.closure_le.2 subset_closure
#align subgroup.le_closure_to_submonoid Subgroup.le_closure_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.le_closure_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.le_closure_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top {S : Set G} (h : Submonoid.closure S = ⊤) :
closure S = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff' _).2 fun _ => le_closure_toSubmonoid _ <| h.symm ▸ trivial
#align subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top Subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top AddSubgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {K : ι → Subgroup G} (hK : Directed (· ≤ ·) K)
{x : G} : x ∈ (iSup K : Subgroup G) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ K i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ le_iSup K i hi⟩
suffices x ∈ closure (⋃ i, (K i : Set G)) → ∃ i, x ∈ K i by
simpa only [closure_iUnion, closure_eq (K _)] using this
refine fun hx ↦ closure_induction hx (fun _ ↦ mem_iUnion.1) ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact hι.elim fun i ↦ ⟨i, (K i).one_mem⟩
· rintro x y ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases hK i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩
exact ⟨k, mul_mem (hki hi) (hkj hj)⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨i, inv_mem hi⟩
#align subgroup.mem_supr_of_directed Subgroup.mem_iSup_of_directed
#align add_subgroup.mem_supr_of_directed AddSubgroup.mem_iSup_of_directed
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] {S : ι → Subgroup G} (hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) :
((⨆ i, S i : Subgroup G) : Set G) = ⋃ i, S i :=
Set.ext fun x ↦ by simp [mem_iSup_of_directed hS]
#align subgroup.coe_supr_of_directed Subgroup.coe_iSup_of_directed
#align add_subgroup.coe_supr_of_directed AddSubgroup.coe_iSup_of_directed
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sSup_of_directedOn {K : Set (Subgroup G)} (Kne : K.Nonempty) (hK : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) K)
{x : G} : x ∈ sSup K ↔ ∃ s ∈ K, x ∈ s := by
haveI : Nonempty K := Kne.to_subtype
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed hK.directed_val, SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk,
exists_prop]
#align subgroup.mem_Sup_of_directed_on Subgroup.mem_sSup_of_directedOn
#align add_subgroup.mem_Sup_of_directed_on AddSubgroup.mem_sSup_of_directedOn
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- The preimage of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of an `AddSubgroup` along an `AddMonoid` homomorphism
is an `AddSubgroup`."]
def comap {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N) (H : Subgroup N) : Subgroup G :=
{ H.toSubmonoid.comap f with
carrier := f ⁻¹' H
inv_mem' := fun {a} ha => show f a⁻¹ ∈ H by rw [f.map_inv]; exact H.inv_mem ha }
#align subgroup.comap Subgroup.comap
#align add_subgroup.comap AddSubgroup.comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_comap (K : Subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (K.comap f : Set G) = f ⁻¹' K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_comap Subgroup.coe_comap
#align add_subgroup.coe_comap AddSubgroup.coe_comap
@[simp]
theorem toAddSubgroup_comap {G₂ : Type*} [Group G₂] (f : G →* G₂) (s : Subgroup G₂) :
s.toAddSubgroup.comap (MonoidHom.toAdditive f) = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup (s.comap f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_comap {A A₂ : Type*} [AddGroup A] [AddGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A₂) :
s.toSubgroup.comap (AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f) = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup (s.comap f) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_comap {K : Subgroup N} {f : G →* N} {x : G} : x ∈ K.comap f ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_comap Subgroup.mem_comap
#align add_subgroup.mem_comap AddSubgroup.mem_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_mono {f : G →* N} {K K' : Subgroup N} : K ≤ K' → comap f K ≤ comap f K' :=
preimage_mono
#align subgroup.comap_mono Subgroup.comap_mono
#align add_subgroup.comap_mono AddSubgroup.comap_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_comap (K : Subgroup P) (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) :
(K.comap g).comap f = K.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_comap Subgroup.comap_comap
#align add_subgroup.comap_comap AddSubgroup.comap_comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_id (K : Subgroup N) : K.comap (MonoidHom.id _) = K := by
ext
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_id Subgroup.comap_id
#align add_subgroup.comap_id AddSubgroup.comap_id
/-- The image of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of an `AddSubgroup` along an `AddMonoid` homomorphism
is an `AddSubgroup`."]
def map (f : G →* N) (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup N :=
{ H.toSubmonoid.map f with
carrier := f '' H
inv_mem' := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, H.inv_mem hx, f.map_inv x⟩ }
#align subgroup.map Subgroup.map
#align add_subgroup.map AddSubgroup.map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_map (f : G →* N) (K : Subgroup G) : (K.map f : Set N) = f '' K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_map Subgroup.coe_map
#align add_subgroup.coe_map AddSubgroup.coe_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_map {f : G →* N} {K : Subgroup G} {y : N} : y ∈ K.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, f x = y := Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_map Subgroup.mem_map
#align add_subgroup.mem_map AddSubgroup.mem_map
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : G →* N) {K : Subgroup G} {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : f x ∈ K.map f :=
mem_image_of_mem f hx
#align subgroup.mem_map_of_mem Subgroup.mem_map_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_map_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_map_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : G →* N) (K : Subgroup G) (x : K) : f x ∈ K.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
#align subgroup.apply_coe_mem_map Subgroup.apply_coe_mem_map
#align add_subgroup.apply_coe_mem_map AddSubgroup.apply_coe_mem_map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mono {f : G →* N} {K K' : Subgroup G} : K ≤ K' → map f K ≤ map f K' :=
image_subset _
#align subgroup.map_mono Subgroup.map_mono
#align add_subgroup.map_mono AddSubgroup.map_mono
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id : K.map (MonoidHom.id G) = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_id _
#align subgroup.map_id Subgroup.map_id
#align add_subgroup.map_id AddSubgroup.map_id
@[to_additive]
theorem map_map (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : (K.map f).map g = K.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_image _ _ _
#align subgroup.map_map Subgroup.map_map
#align add_subgroup.map_map AddSubgroup.map_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_one_eq_bot : K.map (1 : G →* N) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr <| by
rintro x ⟨y, _, rfl⟩
simp
#align subgroup.map_one_eq_bot Subgroup.map_one_eq_bot
#align add_subgroup.map_zero_eq_bot AddSubgroup.map_zero_eq_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : G ≃* N} {K : Subgroup G} {x : N} :
x ∈ K.map f.toMonoidHom ↔ f.symm x ∈ K := by
erw [@Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (↑K) f.toEquiv x]; rfl
#align subgroup.mem_map_equiv Subgroup.mem_map_equiv
#align add_subgroup.mem_map_equiv AddSubgroup.mem_map_equiv
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Subgroup.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mem_map_iff_mem {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) {K : Subgroup G} {x : G} :
f x ∈ K.map f ↔ x ∈ K :=
hf.mem_set_image
#align subgroup.mem_map_iff_mem Subgroup.mem_map_iff_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_map_iff_mem AddSubgroup.mem_map_iff_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm' (f : G ≃* N) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.map f.toMonoidHom = K.comap f.symm.toMonoidHom :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
#align subgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm Subgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm'
#align add_subgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm AddSubgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm'
@[to_additive]
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : G ≃* N) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.map f = K.comap (G := N) f.symm :=
map_equiv_eq_comap_symm' _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : N ≃* G) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.comap (G := N) f = K.map f.symm :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm' (f : N ≃* G) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.comap f.toMonoidHom = K.map f.symm.toMonoidHom :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
#align subgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm Subgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm'
#align add_subgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm AddSubgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm'
@[to_additive]
theorem map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq {H : Subgroup N} {e : G ≃* N} :
H.map ↑e.symm = K ↔ K.map ↑e = H := by
constructor <;> rintro rfl
· rw [map_map, ← MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_trans, MulEquiv.symm_trans_self,
MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_refl, map_id]
· rw [map_map, ← MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_trans, MulEquiv.self_trans_symm,
MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_refl, map_id]
#align subgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq Subgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq
#align add_subgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq AddSubgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : G →* N} {K : Subgroup G} {H : Subgroup N} :
K.map f ≤ H ↔ K ≤ H.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
#align subgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap Subgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align add_subgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap AddSubgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem gc_map_comap (f : G →* N) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align subgroup.gc_map_comap Subgroup.gc_map_comap
#align add_subgroup.gc_map_comap AddSubgroup.gc_map_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem map_sup (H K : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊔ K).map f = H.map f ⊔ K.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
#align subgroup.map_sup Subgroup.map_sup
#align add_subgroup.map_sup AddSubgroup.map_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → Subgroup G) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
#align subgroup.map_supr Subgroup.map_iSup
#align add_subgroup.map_supr AddSubgroup.map_iSup
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_sup_comap_le (H K : Subgroup N) (f : G →* N) :
comap f H ⊔ comap f K ≤ comap f (H ⊔ K) :=
Monotone.le_map_sup (fun _ _ => comap_mono) H K
#align subgroup.comap_sup_comap_le Subgroup.comap_sup_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.comap_sup_comap_le AddSubgroup.comap_sup_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_comap_le {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → Subgroup N) :
⨆ i, (s i).comap f ≤ (iSup s).comap f :=
Monotone.le_map_iSup fun _ _ => comap_mono
#align subgroup.supr_comap_le Subgroup.iSup_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.supr_comap_le AddSubgroup.iSup_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_inf (H K : Subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊓ K).comap f = H.comap f ⊓ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
#align subgroup.comap_inf Subgroup.comap_inf
#align add_subgroup.comap_inf AddSubgroup.comap_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → Subgroup N) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_iInf
#align subgroup.comap_infi Subgroup.comap_iInf
#align add_subgroup.comap_infi AddSubgroup.comap_iInf
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inf_le (H K : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) : map f (H ⊓ K) ≤ map f H ⊓ map f K :=
le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_mono inf_le_right)
#align subgroup.map_inf_le Subgroup.map_inf_le
#align add_subgroup.map_inf_le AddSubgroup.map_inf_le
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inf_eq (H K : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
map f (H ⊓ K) = map f H ⊓ map f K := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq]
simp [Set.image_inter hf]
#align subgroup.map_inf_eq Subgroup.map_inf_eq
#align add_subgroup.map_inf_eq AddSubgroup.map_inf_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_bot (f : G →* N) : (⊥ : Subgroup G).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align subgroup.map_bot Subgroup.map_bot
#align add_subgroup.map_bot AddSubgroup.map_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_top_of_surjective (f : G →* N) (h : Function.Surjective f) : Subgroup.map f ⊤ = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
intro x _
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h x
exact ⟨y, trivial, hy⟩
#align subgroup.map_top_of_surjective Subgroup.map_top_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.map_top_of_surjective AddSubgroup.map_top_of_surjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_top (f : G →* N) : (⊤ : Subgroup N).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align subgroup.comap_top Subgroup.comap_top
#align add_subgroup.comap_top AddSubgroup.comap_top
/-- For any subgroups `H` and `K`, view `H ⊓ K` as a subgroup of `K`. -/
@[to_additive "For any subgroups `H` and `K`, view `H ⊓ K` as a subgroup of `K`."]
def subgroupOf (H K : Subgroup G) : Subgroup K :=
H.comap K.subtype
#align subgroup.subgroup_of Subgroup.subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf
/-- If `H ≤ K`, then `H` as a subgroup of `K` is isomorphic to `H`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `H ≤ K`, then `H` as a subgroup of `K` is isomorphic to `H`."]
def subgroupOfEquivOfLe {G : Type*} [Group G] {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) :
H.subgroupOf K ≃* H where
toFun g := ⟨g.1, g.2⟩
invFun g := ⟨⟨g.1, h g.2⟩, g.2⟩
left_inv _g := Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext rfl)
right_inv _g := Subtype.ext rfl
map_mul' _g _h := rfl
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_equiv_of_le AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOfEquivOfLe
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_symm_apply_coe_coe Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe_symm_apply_coe_coe
#align add_subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_symm_apply_coe_coe AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOfEquivOfLe_symm_apply_coe_coe
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_apply_coe Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_apply_coe AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOfEquivOfLe_apply_coe
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_subtype (H K : Subgroup G) : H.comap K.subtype = H.subgroupOf K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_subtype Subgroup.comap_subtype
#align add_subgroup.comap_subtype AddSubgroup.comap_subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_inclusion_subgroupOf {K₁ K₂ : Subgroup G} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) (H : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K₂).comap (inclusion h) = H.subgroupOf K₁ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_inclusion_subgroup_of Subgroup.comap_inclusion_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.comap_inclusion_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.comap_inclusion_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_subgroupOf (H K : Subgroup G) : (H.subgroupOf K : Set K) = K.subtype ⁻¹' H :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_subgroup_of Subgroup.coe_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.coe_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.coe_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_subgroupOf {H K : Subgroup G} {h : K} : h ∈ H.subgroupOf K ↔ (h : G) ∈ H :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_subgroup_of Subgroup.mem_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.mem_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.mem_addSubgroupOf
-- TODO(kmill): use `K ⊓ H` order for RHS to match `Subtype.image_preimage_coe`
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_map_subtype (H K : Subgroup G) : (H.subgroupOf K).map K.subtype = H ⊓ K :=
SetLike.ext' <| by refine Subtype.image_preimage_coe _ _ |>.trans ?_; apply Set.inter_comm
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_map_subtype Subgroup.subgroupOf_map_subtype
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_map_subtype AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_map_subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_subgroupOf : (⊥ : Subgroup G).subgroupOf H = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm (Subgroup.ext fun _g => Subtype.ext_iff)
#align subgroup.bot_subgroup_of Subgroup.bot_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.bot_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.bot_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_subgroupOf : (⊤ : Subgroup G).subgroupOf H = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.top_subgroup_of Subgroup.top_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.top_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.top_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_bot_eq_bot : H.subgroupOf ⊥ = ⊥ :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_bot_eq_bot Subgroup.subgroupOf_bot_eq_bot
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_bot_eq_bot AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_bot_eq_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_bot_eq_top : H.subgroupOf ⊥ = ⊤ :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_bot_eq_top Subgroup.subgroupOf_bot_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_bot_eq_top AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_bot_eq_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_self : H.subgroupOf H = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun g _hg => g.2
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_self Subgroup.subgroupOf_self
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_self AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_inj {H₁ H₂ K : Subgroup G} :
H₁.subgroupOf K = H₂.subgroupOf K ↔ H₁ ⊓ K = H₂ ⊓ K := by
simpa only [SetLike.ext_iff, mem_inf, mem_subgroupOf, and_congr_left_iff] using Subtype.forall
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_inj Subgroup.subgroupOf_inj
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_inj AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_inj
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_right (H K : Subgroup G) : (H ⊓ K).subgroupOf K = H.subgroupOf K :=
subgroupOf_inj.2 (inf_right_idem _ _)
#align subgroup.inf_subgroup_of_right Subgroup.inf_subgroupOf_right
#align add_subgroup.inf_add_subgroup_of_right AddSubgroup.inf_addSubgroupOf_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_left (H K : Subgroup G) : (K ⊓ H).subgroupOf K = H.subgroupOf K := by
rw [inf_comm, inf_subgroupOf_right]
#align subgroup.inf_subgroup_of_left Subgroup.inf_subgroupOf_left
#align add_subgroup.inf_add_subgroup_of_left AddSubgroup.inf_addSubgroupOf_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_eq_bot {H K : Subgroup G} : H.subgroupOf K = ⊥ ↔ Disjoint H K := by
rw [disjoint_iff, ← bot_subgroupOf, subgroupOf_inj, bot_inf_eq]
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_eq_bot Subgroup.subgroupOf_eq_bot
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_eq_bot AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_eq_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_eq_top {H K : Subgroup G} : H.subgroupOf K = ⊤ ↔ K ≤ H := by
rw [← top_subgroupOf, subgroupOf_inj, top_inf_eq, inf_eq_right]
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_eq_top Subgroup.subgroupOf_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_eq_top AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_eq_top
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
#align subgroup.prod Subgroup.prod
#align add_subgroup.prod AddSubgroup.prod
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_prod Subgroup.coe_prod
#align add_subgroup.coe_prod AddSubgroup.coe_prod
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_prod Subgroup.mem_prod
#align add_subgroup.mem_prod AddSubgroup.mem_prod
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
#align subgroup.prod_mono Subgroup.prod_mono
#align add_subgroup.prod_mono AddSubgroup.prod_mono
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
#align subgroup.prod_mono_right Subgroup.prod_mono_right
#align add_subgroup.prod_mono_right AddSubgroup.prod_mono_right
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
#align subgroup.prod_mono_left Subgroup.prod_mono_left
#align add_subgroup.prod_mono_left AddSubgroup.prod_mono_left
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
#align subgroup.prod_top Subgroup.prod_top
#align add_subgroup.prod_top AddSubgroup.prod_top
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
#align subgroup.top_prod Subgroup.top_prod
#align add_subgroup.top_prod AddSubgroup.top_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
#align subgroup.top_prod_top Subgroup.top_prod_top
#align add_subgroup.top_prod_top AddSubgroup.top_prod_top
@[to_additive]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod, Prod.one_eq_mk]
#align subgroup.bot_prod_bot Subgroup.bot_prod_bot
#align add_subgroup.bot_sum_bot AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
#align subgroup.le_prod_iff Subgroup.le_prod_iff
#align add_subgroup.le_prod_iff AddSubgroup.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
#align subgroup.prod_le_iff Subgroup.prod_le_iff
#align add_subgroup.prod_le_iff AddSubgroup.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_eq] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
#align subgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align subgroup.prod_equiv Subgroup.prodEquiv
#align add_subgroup.prod_equiv AddSubgroup.prodEquiv
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
#align submonoid.pi Submonoid.pi
#align add_submonoid.pi AddSubmonoid.pi
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
#align subgroup.pi Subgroup.pi
#align add_subgroup.pi AddSubgroup.pi
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_pi Subgroup.coe_pi
#align add_subgroup.coe_pi AddSubgroup.coe_pi
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_pi Subgroup.mem_pi
#align add_subgroup.mem_pi AddSubgroup.mem_pi
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
#align subgroup.pi_top Subgroup.pi_top
#align add_subgroup.pi_top AddSubgroup.pi_top
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
#align subgroup.pi_empty Subgroup.pi_empty
#align add_subgroup.pi_empty AddSubgroup.pi_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
#align subgroup.pi_bot Subgroup.pi_bot
#align add_subgroup.pi_bot AddSubgroup.pi_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
#align subgroup.le_pi_iff Subgroup.le_pi_iff
#align add_subgroup.le_pi_iff AddSubgroup.le_pi_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
#align subgroup.mul_single_mem_pi Subgroup.mulSingle_mem_pi
#align add_subgroup.single_mem_pi AddSubgroup.single_mem_pi
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
#align subgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff
end Pi
/-- A subgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure Normal : Prop where
/-- `N` is closed under conjugation -/
conj_mem : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : G, g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H
#align subgroup.normal Subgroup.Normal
attribute [class] Normal
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
/-- An AddSubgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g + n - g ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure Normal (H : AddSubgroup A) : Prop where
/-- `N` is closed under additive conjugation -/
conj_mem : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : A, g + n + -g ∈ H
#align add_subgroup.normal AddSubgroup.Normal
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Normal
attribute [class] Normal
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_comm {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (H : Subgroup G) : H.Normal :=
⟨by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm]⟩
#align subgroup.normal_of_comm Subgroup.normal_of_comm
#align add_subgroup.normal_of_comm AddSubgroup.normal_of_comm
namespace Normal
variable (nH : H.Normal)
@[to_additive]
theorem conj_mem' (n : G) (hn : n ∈ H) (g : G) :
g⁻¹ * n * g ∈ H := by
convert nH.conj_mem n hn g⁻¹
rw [inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_comm {a b : G} (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have : a⁻¹ * (a * b) * a⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ H := nH.conj_mem (a * b) h a⁻¹
-- Porting note: Previous code was:
-- simpa
simp_all only [inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_inv]
#align subgroup.normal.mem_comm Subgroup.Normal.mem_comm
#align add_subgroup.normal.mem_comm AddSubgroup.Normal.mem_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a * b ∈ H ↔ b * a ∈ H :=
⟨nH.mem_comm, nH.mem_comm⟩
#align subgroup.normal.mem_comm_iff Subgroup.Normal.mem_comm_iff
#align add_subgroup.normal.mem_comm_iff AddSubgroup.Normal.mem_comm_iff
end Normal
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
#align subgroup.characteristic Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
#align subgroup.normal_of_characteristic Subgroup.normal_of_characteristic
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
#align add_subgroup.characteristic AddSubgroup.Characteristic
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
#align add_subgroup.normal_of_characteristic AddSubgroup.normal_of_characteristic
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq Subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le Subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap Subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq Subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le Subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map Subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
#align subgroup.bot_characteristic Subgroup.botCharacteristic
#align add_subgroup.bot_characteristic AddSubgroup.botCharacteristic
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
#align subgroup.top_characteristic Subgroup.topCharacteristic
#align add_subgroup.top_characteristic AddSubgroup.topCharacteristic
variable (H)
section Normalizer
/-- The `normalizer` of `H` is the largest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The `normalizer` of `H` is the largest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal."]
def normalizer : Subgroup G where
carrier := { g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' {a b} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ H) n := by
rw [hb, ha]
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev]
inv_mem' {a} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) n := by
rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)]
simp only [inv_inv, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_right_inv, mul_one]
#align subgroup.normalizer Subgroup.normalizer
#align add_subgroup.normalizer AddSubgroup.normalizer
-- variant for sets.
-- TODO should this replace `normalizer`?
/-- The `setNormalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy `g*S*g⁻¹=S` -/
@[to_additive
"The `setNormalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy
`g+S-g=S`."]
def setNormalizer (S : Set G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ S }
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' {a b} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ S) n := by
rw [hb, ha]
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev]
inv_mem' {a} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) n := by
rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)]
simp only [inv_inv, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_right_inv, mul_one]
#align subgroup.set_normalizer Subgroup.setNormalizer
#align add_subgroup.set_normalizer AddSubgroup.setNormalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_normalizer_iff {g : G} : g ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ h, h ∈ H ↔ g * h * g⁻¹ ∈ H :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff
#align add_subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff AddSubgroup.mem_normalizer_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_normalizer_iff'' {g : G} : g ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ h : G, h ∈ H ↔ g⁻¹ * h * g ∈ H := by
rw [← inv_mem_iff (x := g), mem_normalizer_iff, inv_inv]
#align subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'' Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff''
#align add_subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'' AddSubgroup.mem_normalizer_iff''
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_normalizer_iff' {g : G} : g ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ n, n * g ∈ H ↔ g * n ∈ H :=
⟨fun h n => by rw [h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_right], fun h n => by
rw [mul_assoc, ← h, inv_mul_cancel_right]⟩
#align subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff' Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'
#align add_subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff' AddSubgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer : H ≤ normalizer H := fun x xH n => by
rw [H.mul_mem_cancel_right (H.inv_mem xH), H.mul_mem_cancel_left xH]
#align subgroup.le_normalizer Subgroup.le_normalizer
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer AddSubgroup.le_normalizer
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
⟨fun x xH g => by simpa only [mem_subgroupOf] using (g.2 x.1).1 xH⟩
#align subgroup.normal_in_normalizer Subgroup.normal_in_normalizer
#align add_subgroup.normal_in_normalizer AddSubgroup.normal_in_normalizer
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
#align subgroup.normalizer_eq_top Subgroup.normalizer_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.normalizer_eq_top AddSubgroup.normalizer_eq_top
open scoped Classical
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) : K ≤ H.normalizer :=
fun x hx y =>
⟨fun yH => hK.conj_mem ⟨y, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x, hx⟩, fun yH => by
simpa [mem_subgroupOf, mul_assoc] using
hK.conj_mem ⟨x * y * x⁻¹, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x⁻¹, K.inv_mem hx⟩⟩
#align subgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal Subgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal AddSubgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
#align subgroup.le_normalizer_comap Subgroup.le_normalizer_comap
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer_comap AddSubgroup.le_normalizer_comap
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
#align subgroup.le_normalizer_map Subgroup.le_normalizer_map
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer_map AddSubgroup.le_normalizer_map
variable (G)
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
#align normalizer_condition NormalizerCondition
variable {G}
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, true_and_iff, le_top, Ne]
tauto
#align normalizer_condition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing
variable (H)
/-- In a group that satisfies the normalizer condition, every maximal subgroup is normal -/
theorem NormalizerCondition.normal_of_coatom (hnc : NormalizerCondition G) (hmax : IsCoatom H) :
H.Normal :=
normalizer_eq_top.mp (hmax.2 _ (hnc H (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hmax.1)))
#align subgroup.normalizer_condition.normal_of_coatom Subgroup.NormalizerCondition.normal_of_coatom
end Normalizer
/-- Commutativity of a subgroup -/
structure IsCommutative : Prop where
/-- `*` is commutative on `H` -/
is_comm : Std.Commutative (α := H) (· * ·)
#align subgroup.is_commutative Subgroup.IsCommutative
attribute [class] IsCommutative
/-- Commutativity of an additive subgroup -/
structure _root_.AddSubgroup.IsCommutative (H : AddSubgroup A) : Prop where
/-- `+` is commutative on `H` -/
is_comm : Std.Commutative (α := H) (· + ·)
#align add_subgroup.is_commutative AddSubgroup.IsCommutative
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.IsCommutative
attribute [class] AddSubgroup.IsCommutative
/-- A commutative subgroup is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "A commutative subgroup is commutative."]
instance IsCommutative.commGroup [h : H.IsCommutative] : CommGroup H :=
{ H.toGroup with mul_comm := h.is_comm.comm }
#align subgroup.is_commutative.comm_group Subgroup.IsCommutative.commGroup
#align add_subgroup.is_commutative.add_comm_group AddSubgroup.IsCommutative.addCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance map_isCommutative (f : G →* G') [H.IsCommutative] : (H.map f).IsCommutative :=
⟨⟨by
rintro ⟨-, a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨-, b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_mul, coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, ← map_mul, ← map_mul]
exact congr_arg f (Subtype.ext_iff.mp (mul_comm (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) ⟨b, hb⟩))⟩⟩
#align subgroup.map_is_commutative Subgroup.map_isCommutative
#align add_subgroup.map_is_commutative AddSubgroup.map_isCommutative
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_injective_isCommutative {f : G' →* G} (hf : Injective f) [H.IsCommutative] :
(H.comap f).IsCommutative :=
⟨⟨fun a b =>
Subtype.ext
(by
have := mul_comm (⟨f a, a.2⟩ : H) (⟨f b, b.2⟩ : H)
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_mul, coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, ← map_mul, ← map_mul,
hf.eq_iff] at this)⟩⟩
#align subgroup.comap_injective_is_commutative Subgroup.comap_injective_isCommutative
#align add_subgroup.comap_injective_is_commutative AddSubgroup.comap_injective_isCommutative
@[to_additive]
instance subgroupOf_isCommutative [H.IsCommutative] : (H.subgroupOf K).IsCommutative :=
H.comap_injective_isCommutative Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_is_commutative Subgroup.subgroupOf_isCommutative
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_is_commutative AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_isCommutative
end Subgroup
namespace MulEquiv
variable {H : Type*} [Group H]
/--
An isomorphism of groups gives an order isomorphism between the lattices of subgroups,
defined by sending subgroups to their inverse images.
See also `MulEquiv.mapSubgroup` which maps subgroups to their forward images.
-/
@[simps]
def comapSubgroup (f : G ≃* H) : Subgroup H ≃o Subgroup G where
toFun := Subgroup.comap f
invFun := Subgroup.comap f.symm
left_inv sg := by simp [Subgroup.comap_comap]
right_inv sh := by simp [Subgroup.comap_comap]
map_rel_iff' {sg1 sg2} :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [Subgroup.comap_comap] using
Subgroup.comap_mono (f := (f.symm : H →* G)) h, Subgroup.comap_mono⟩
/--
An isomorphism of groups gives an order isomorphism between the lattices of subgroups,
defined by sending subgroups to their forward images.
See also `MulEquiv.comapSubgroup` which maps subgroups to their inverse images.
-/
@[simps]
def mapSubgroup {H : Type*} [Group H] (f : G ≃* H) : Subgroup G ≃o Subgroup H where
toFun := Subgroup.map f
invFun := Subgroup.map f.symm
left_inv sg := by simp [Subgroup.map_map]
right_inv sh := by simp [Subgroup.map_map]
map_rel_iff' {sg1 sg2} :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [Subgroup.map_map] using
Subgroup.map_mono (f := (f.symm : H →* G)) h, Subgroup.map_mono⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_comap {H : Type*} [Group H] (f : G ≃* H) {K : Subgroup H} :
IsCoatom (Subgroup.comap (f : G →* H) K) ↔ IsCoatom K :=
OrderIso.isCoatom_iff (f.comapSubgroup) K
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_map (f : G ≃* H) {K : Subgroup G} :
IsCoatom (Subgroup.map (f : G →* H) K) ↔ IsCoatom K :=
OrderIso.isCoatom_iff (f.mapSubgroup) K
end MulEquiv
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
#align group.conjugates_of_set Group.conjugatesOfSet
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
erw [Set.mem_iUnion₂]; simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
#align group.mem_conjugates_of_set_iff Group.mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
#align group.subset_conjugates_of_set Group.subset_conjugatesOfSet
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
#align group.conjugates_of_set_mono Group.conjugatesOfSet_mono
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
#align group.conjugates_subset_normal Group.conjugates_subset_normal
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
#align group.conjugates_of_set_subset Group.conjugatesOfSet_subset
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
#align group.conj_mem_conjugates_of_set Group.conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
#align subgroup.normal_closure Subgroup.normalClosure
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
#align subgroup.conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure Subgroup.conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
#align subgroup.subset_normal_closure Subgroup.subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
#align subgroup.le_normal_closure Subgroup.le_normalClosure
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction h (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y ihx ihy => ?_) fun x ihx => ?_
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
#align subgroup.normal_closure_normal Subgroup.normalClosure_normal
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction w (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y ihx ihy => ?_) fun x ihx => ?_
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
#align subgroup.normal_closure_le_normal Subgroup.normalClosure_le_normal
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
#align subgroup.normal_closure_subset_iff Subgroup.normalClosure_subset_iff
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
#align subgroup.normal_closure_mono Subgroup.normalClosure_mono
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun N => le_iInf fun hN => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
#align subgroup.normal_closure_eq_infi Subgroup.normalClosure_eq_iInf
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
#align subgroup.normal_closure_eq_self Subgroup.normalClosure_eq_self
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
#align subgroup.normal_closure_idempotent Subgroup.normalClosure_idempotent
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
#align subgroup.closure_le_normal_closure Subgroup.closure_le_normalClosure
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
#align subgroup.normal_closure_closure_eq_normal_closure Subgroup.normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_self]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {a} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
#align subgroup.normal_core Subgroup.normalCore
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
#align subgroup.normal_core_le Subgroup.normalCore_le
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
#align subgroup.normal_core_normal Subgroup.normalCore_normal
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
#align subgroup.normal_le_normal_core Subgroup.normal_le_normalCore
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
#align subgroup.normal_core_mono Subgroup.normalCore_mono
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
#align subgroup.normal_core_eq_supr Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
#align subgroup.normal_core_eq_self Subgroup.normalCore_eq_self
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
#align subgroup.normal_core_idempotent Subgroup.normalCore_idempotent
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
/-- The range of a monoid homomorphism from a group is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The range of an `AddMonoidHom` from an `AddGroup` is an `AddSubgroup`."]
def range (f : G →* N) : Subgroup N :=
Subgroup.copy ((⊤ : Subgroup G).map f) (Set.range f) (by simp [Set.ext_iff])
#align monoid_hom.range MonoidHom.range
#align add_monoid_hom.range AddMonoidHom.range
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_range (f : G →* N) : (f.range : Set N) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_range MonoidHom.coe_range
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_range AddMonoidHom.coe_range
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_range {f : G →* N} {y : N} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align monoid_hom.mem_range MonoidHom.mem_range
#align add_monoid_hom.mem_range AddMonoidHom.mem_range
@[to_additive]
theorem range_eq_map (f : G →* N) : f.range = (⊤ : Subgroup G).map f := by ext; simp
#align monoid_hom.range_eq_map MonoidHom.range_eq_map
#align add_monoid_hom.range_eq_map AddMonoidHom.range_eq_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem restrict_range (f : G →* N) : (f.restrict K).range = K.map f := by
simp_rw [SetLike.ext_iff, mem_range, mem_map, restrict_apply, SetLike.exists,
exists_prop, forall_const]
#align monoid_hom.restrict_range MonoidHom.restrict_range
#align add_monoid_hom.restrict_range AddMonoidHom.restrict_range
/-- The canonical surjective group homomorphism `G →* f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →* N`. -/
@[to_additive
"The canonical surjective `AddGroup` homomorphism `G →+ f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →+ N`."]
def rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) : G →* f.range :=
codRestrict f _ fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align monoid_hom.range_restrict MonoidHom.rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.range_restrict AddMonoidHom.rangeRestrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) (g : G) : (f.rangeRestrict g : N) = f g :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_range_restrict MonoidHom.coe_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.coe_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_comp_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) :
((↑) : f.range → N) ∘ (⇑f.rangeRestrict : G → f.range) = f :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_comp_range_restrict MonoidHom.coe_comp_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_comp_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.coe_comp_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_comp_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) : f.range.subtype.comp f.rangeRestrict = f :=
ext <| f.coe_rangeRestrict
#align monoid_hom.subtype_comp_range_restrict MonoidHom.subtype_comp_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.subtype_comp_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.subtype_comp_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive]
theorem rangeRestrict_surjective (f : G →* N) : Function.Surjective f.rangeRestrict :=
fun ⟨_, g, rfl⟩ => ⟨g, rfl⟩
#align monoid_hom.range_restrict_surjective MonoidHom.rangeRestrict_surjective
#align add_monoid_hom.range_restrict_surjective AddMonoidHom.rangeRestrict_surjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma rangeRestrict_injective_iff {f : G →* N} : Injective f.rangeRestrict ↔ Injective f := by
convert Set.injective_codRestrict _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_range (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : f.range.map g = (g.comp f).range := by
rw [range_eq_map, range_eq_map]; exact (⊤ : Subgroup G).map_map g f
#align monoid_hom.map_range MonoidHom.map_range
#align add_monoid_hom.map_range AddMonoidHom.map_range
@[to_additive]
theorem range_top_iff_surjective {N} [Group N] {f : G →* N} :
f.range = (⊤ : Subgroup N) ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans <| Iff.trans (by rw [coe_range, coe_top]) Set.range_iff_surjective
#align monoid_hom.range_top_iff_surjective MonoidHom.range_top_iff_surjective
#align add_monoid_hom.range_top_iff_surjective AddMonoidHom.range_top_iff_surjective
/-- The range of a surjective monoid homomorphism is the whole of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"The range of a surjective `AddMonoid` homomorphism is the whole of the codomain."]
theorem range_top_of_surjective {N} [Group N] (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
f.range = (⊤ : Subgroup N) :=
range_top_iff_surjective.2 hf
#align monoid_hom.range_top_of_surjective MonoidHom.range_top_of_surjective
#align add_monoid_hom.range_top_of_surjective AddMonoidHom.range_top_of_surjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem range_one : (1 : G →* N).range = ⊥ :=
SetLike.ext fun x => by simpa using @comm _ (· = ·) _ 1 x
#align monoid_hom.range_one MonoidHom.range_one
#align add_monoid_hom.range_zero AddMonoidHom.range_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.subtype_range (H : Subgroup G) : H.subtype.range = H := by
rw [range_eq_map, ← SetLike.coe_set_eq, coe_map, Subgroup.coeSubtype]
ext
simp
#align subgroup.subtype_range Subgroup.subtype_range
#align add_subgroup.subtype_range AddSubgroup.subtype_range
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.inclusion_range {H K : Subgroup G} (h_le : H ≤ K) :
(inclusion h_le).range = H.subgroupOf K :=
Subgroup.ext fun g => Set.ext_iff.mp (Set.range_inclusion h_le) g
#align subgroup.inclusion_range Subgroup.inclusion_range
#align add_subgroup.inclusion_range AddSubgroup.inclusion_range
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_range_eq_of_le {G₁ G₂ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] {K : Subgroup G₂}
(f : G₁ →* G₂) (h : f.range ≤ K) :
f.range.subgroupOf K = (f.codRestrict K fun x => h ⟨x, rfl⟩).range := by
ext k
refine exists_congr ?_
simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
#align monoid_hom.subgroup_of_range_eq_of_le MonoidHom.subgroupOf_range_eq_of_le
#align add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_of_range_eq_of_le AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupOf_range_eq_of_le
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAdditive_range (f : G →* G') :
(MonoidHom.toAdditive f).range = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup f.range := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiplicative_range {A A' : Type*} [AddGroup A] [AddGroup A'] (f : A →+ A') :
(AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f).range = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup f.range := rfl
/-- Computable alternative to `MonoidHom.ofInjective`. -/
@[to_additive "Computable alternative to `AddMonoidHom.ofInjective`."]
def ofLeftInverse {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) : G ≃* f.range :=
{ f.rangeRestrict with
toFun := f.rangeRestrict
invFun := g ∘ f.range.subtype
left_inv := h
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, y, rfl⟩
apply Subtype.ext
rw [coe_rangeRestrict, Function.comp_apply, Subgroup.coeSubtype, Subtype.coe_mk, h] }
#align monoid_hom.of_left_inverse MonoidHom.ofLeftInverse
#align add_monoid_hom.of_left_inverse AddMonoidHom.ofLeftInverse
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLeftInverse_apply {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (x : G) :
↑(ofLeftInverse h x) = f x :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_apply MonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_apply AddMonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLeftInverse_symm_apply {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(x : f.range) : (ofLeftInverse h).symm x = g x :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_symm_apply MonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_symm_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_symm_apply AddMonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_symm_apply
/-- The range of an injective group homomorphism is isomorphic to its domain. -/
@[to_additive "The range of an injective additive group homomorphism is isomorphic to its
domain."]
noncomputable def ofInjective {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) : G ≃* f.range :=
MulEquiv.ofBijective (f.codRestrict f.range fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩)
⟨fun x y h => hf (Subtype.ext_iff.mp h), by
rintro ⟨x, y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
#align monoid_hom.of_injective MonoidHom.ofInjective
#align add_monoid_hom.of_injective AddMonoidHom.ofInjective
@[to_additive]
theorem ofInjective_apply {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) {x : G} :
↑(ofInjective hf x) = f x :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.of_injective_apply MonoidHom.ofInjective_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.of_injective_apply AddMonoidHom.ofInjective_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem apply_ofInjective_symm {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : f.range) :
f ((ofInjective hf).symm x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (ofInjective hf).apply_symm_apply x
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
/-- The multiplicative kernel of a monoid homomorphism is the subgroup of elements `x : G` such that
`f x = 1` -/
@[to_additive
"The additive kernel of an `AddMonoid` homomorphism is the `AddSubgroup` of elements
such that `f x = 0`"]
def ker (f : G →* M) : Subgroup G :=
{ MonoidHom.mker f with
inv_mem' := fun {x} (hx : f x = 1) =>
calc
f x⁻¹ = f x * f x⁻¹ := by rw [hx, one_mul]
_ = 1 := by rw [← map_mul, mul_inv_self, map_one] }
#align monoid_hom.ker MonoidHom.ker
#align add_monoid_hom.ker AddMonoidHom.ker
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ker (f : G →* M) {x : G} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align monoid_hom.mem_ker MonoidHom.mem_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.mem_ker AddMonoidHom.mem_ker
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_ker (f : G →* M) : (f.ker : Set G) = (f : G → M) ⁻¹' {1} :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_ker MonoidHom.coe_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_ker AddMonoidHom.coe_ker
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_toHomUnits {M} [Monoid M] (f : G →* M) : f.toHomUnits.ker = f.ker := by
ext x
simp [mem_ker, Units.ext_iff]
#align monoid_hom.ker_to_hom_units MonoidHom.ker_toHomUnits
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_to_hom_add_units AddMonoidHom.ker_toHomAddUnits
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff (f : G →* M) {x y : G} : f x = f y ↔ y⁻¹ * x ∈ f.ker := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_ker, map_mul, h, ← map_mul, inv_mul_self, map_one]
· rw [← one_mul x, ← mul_inv_self y, mul_assoc, map_mul, f.mem_ker.1 h, mul_one]
#align monoid_hom.eq_iff MonoidHom.eq_iff
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_iff AddMonoidHom.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
instance decidableMemKer [DecidableEq M] (f : G →* M) : DecidablePred (· ∈ f.ker) := fun x =>
decidable_of_iff (f x = 1) f.mem_ker
#align monoid_hom.decidable_mem_ker MonoidHom.decidableMemKer
#align add_monoid_hom.decidable_mem_ker AddMonoidHom.decidableMemKer
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_ker (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : g.ker.comap f = (g.comp f).ker :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.comap_ker MonoidHom.comap_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.comap_ker AddMonoidHom.comap_ker
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_bot (f : G →* N) : (⊥ : Subgroup N).comap f = f.ker :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.comap_bot MonoidHom.comap_bot
#align add_monoid_hom.comap_bot AddMonoidHom.comap_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_restrict (f : G →* N) : (f.restrict K).ker = f.ker.subgroupOf K :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.ker_restrict MonoidHom.ker_restrict
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_restrict AddMonoidHom.ker_restrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_codRestrict {S} [SetLike S N] [SubmonoidClass S N] (f : G →* N) (s : S)
(h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : (f.codRestrict s h).ker = f.ker :=
SetLike.ext fun _x => Subtype.ext_iff
#align monoid_hom.ker_cod_restrict MonoidHom.ker_codRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_cod_restrict AddMonoidHom.ker_codRestrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) : ker (rangeRestrict f) = ker f :=
ker_codRestrict _ _ _
#align monoid_hom.ker_range_restrict MonoidHom.ker_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.ker_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_one : (1 : G →* M).ker = ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext fun _x => eq_self_iff_true _
#align monoid_hom.ker_one MonoidHom.ker_one
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_zero AddMonoidHom.ker_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_id : (MonoidHom.id G).ker = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.ker_id MonoidHom.ker_id
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_id AddMonoidHom.ker_id
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff (f : G →* M) : f.ker = ⊥ ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun h x y hxy => by rwa [eq_iff, h, mem_bot, inv_mul_eq_one, eq_comm] at hxy, fun h =>
bot_unique fun x hx => h (hx.trans f.map_one.symm)⟩
#align monoid_hom.ker_eq_bot_iff MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_eq_bot_iff AddMonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.ker_subtype (H : Subgroup G) : H.subtype.ker = ⊥ :=
H.subtype.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.ker_subtype Subgroup.ker_subtype
#align add_subgroup.ker_subtype AddSubgroup.ker_subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.ker_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : (inclusion h).ker = ⊥ :=
(inclusion h).ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr (Set.inclusion_injective h)
#align subgroup.ker_inclusion Subgroup.ker_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.ker_inclusion AddSubgroup.ker_inclusion
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_prod {M N : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : G →* M) (g : G →* N) :
(f.prod g).ker = f.ker ⊓ g.ker :=
SetLike.ext fun _ => Prod.mk_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
#align monoid_hom.prod_map_comap_prod MonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.sum_map_comap_sum AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
#align monoid_hom.ker_prod_map MonoidHom.ker_prodMap
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_sum_map AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap
@[to_additive]
theorem range_le_ker_iff (f : G →* G') (g : G' →* G'') : f.range ≤ g.ker ↔ g.comp f = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ext fun x => h ⟨x, rfl⟩, by rintro h _ ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact DFunLike.congr_fun h y⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_ker (f : G →* M) : f.ker.Normal :=
⟨fun x hx y => by
rw [mem_ker, map_mul, map_mul, f.mem_ker.1 hx, mul_one, map_mul_eq_one f (mul_inv_self y)]⟩
#align monoid_hom.normal_ker MonoidHom.normal_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.normal_ker AddMonoidHom.normal_ker
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (and_true_iff _).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (true_and_iff _).symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAdditive_ker (f : G →* G') :
(MonoidHom.toAdditive f).ker = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup f.ker := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiplicative_ker {A A' : Type*} [AddGroup A] [AddGroup A'] (f : A →+ A') :
(AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f).ker = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup f.ker := rfl
end Ker
section EqLocus
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M]
/-- The subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x` -/
@[to_additive "The additive subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x`"]
def eqLocus (f g : G →* M) : Subgroup G :=
{ eqLocusM f g with inv_mem' := eq_on_inv f g }
#align monoid_hom.eq_locus MonoidHom.eqLocus
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_locus AddMonoidHom.eqLocus
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eqLocus_same (f : G →* N) : f.eqLocus f = ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext fun _ => eq_self_iff_true _
#align monoid_hom.eq_locus_same MonoidHom.eqLocus_same
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_locus_same AddMonoidHom.eqLocus_same
/-- If two monoid homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subgroup closure. -/
@[to_additive
"If two monoid homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subgroup
closure."]
theorem eqOn_closure {f g : G →* M} {s : Set G} (h : Set.EqOn f g s) : Set.EqOn f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ f.eqLocus g from (closure_le _).2 h
#align monoid_hom.eq_on_closure MonoidHom.eqOn_closure
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_on_closure AddMonoidHom.eqOn_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_eqOn_top {f g : G →* M} (h : Set.EqOn f g (⊤ : Subgroup G)) : f = g :=
ext fun _x => h trivial
#align monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_top MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_top
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_top AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_top
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_eqOn_dense {s : Set G} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : G →* M} (h : s.EqOn f g) : f = g :=
eq_of_eqOn_top <| hs ▸ eqOn_closure h
#align monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_dense MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_dense
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_dense AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_dense
end EqLocus
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_preimage_le (f : G →* N) (s : Set N) : closure (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (closure s).comap f :=
(closure_le _).2 fun x hx => by rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap]; exact subset_closure hx
#align monoid_hom.closure_preimage_le MonoidHom.closure_preimage_le
#align add_monoid_hom.closure_preimage_le AddMonoidHom.closure_preimage_le
/-- The image under a monoid homomorphism of the subgroup generated by a set equals the subgroup
generated by the image of the set. -/
@[to_additive
"The image under an `AddMonoid` hom of the `AddSubgroup` generated by a set equals
the `AddSubgroup` generated by the image of the set."]
theorem map_closure (f : G →* N) (s : Set G) : (closure s).map f = closure (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (Subgroup.gc_map_comap f) (Subgroup.gi N).gc
(Subgroup.gi G).gc fun _t => rfl
#align monoid_hom.map_closure MonoidHom.map_closure
#align add_monoid_hom.map_closure AddMonoidHom.map_closure
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map, ←
normalizer_eq_top.2 h]
exact le_normalizer_map _
#align subgroup.normal.map Subgroup.Normal.map
#align add_subgroup.normal.map AddSubgroup.Normal.map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff {f : G →* N} : H.map f = ⊥ ↔ H ≤ f.ker :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_eq_bot
#align subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.map_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
H.map f = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ := by rw [map_eq_bot_iff, f.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr hf, le_bot_iff]
#align subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective Subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective
#align add_subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective AddSubgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_range (H : Subgroup G) : map f H ≤ f.range :=
(range_eq_map f).symm ▸ map_mono le_top
#align subgroup.map_le_range Subgroup.map_le_range
#align add_subgroup.map_le_range AddSubgroup.map_le_range
@[to_additive]
theorem map_subtype_le {H : Subgroup G} (K : Subgroup H) : K.map H.subtype ≤ H :=
(K.map_le_range H.subtype).trans (le_of_eq H.subtype_range)
#align subgroup.map_subtype_le Subgroup.map_subtype_le
#align add_subgroup.map_subtype_le AddSubgroup.map_subtype_le
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_le_comap (H : Subgroup N) : f.ker ≤ comap f H :=
comap_bot f ▸ comap_mono bot_le
#align subgroup.ker_le_comap Subgroup.ker_le_comap
#align add_subgroup.ker_le_comap AddSubgroup.ker_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_le (H : Subgroup N) : map f (comap f H) ≤ H :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align subgroup.map_comap_le Subgroup.map_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_le AddSubgroup.map_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_map (H : Subgroup G) : H ≤ comap f (map f H) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align subgroup.le_comap_map Subgroup.le_comap_map
#align add_subgroup.le_comap_map AddSubgroup.le_comap_map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_eq (H : Subgroup N) : map f (comap f H) = f.range ⊓ H :=
SetLike.ext' <| by
rw [coe_map, coe_comap, Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, coe_inf, coe_range, Set.inter_comm]
#align subgroup.map_comap_eq Subgroup.map_comap_eq
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_eq AddSubgroup.map_comap_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_map_eq (H : Subgroup G) : comap f (map f H) = H ⊔ f.ker := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (sup_le (le_comap_map _ _) (ker_le_comap _ _))
intro x hx; simp only [exists_prop, mem_map, mem_comap] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩
rw [← mul_inv_cancel_left y x]
exact mul_mem_sup hy (by simp [mem_ker, hy'])
#align subgroup.comap_map_eq Subgroup.comap_map_eq
#align add_subgroup.comap_map_eq AddSubgroup.comap_map_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_eq_self {f : G →* N} {H : Subgroup N} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
map f (comap f H) = H := by
rwa [map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
#align subgroup.map_comap_eq_self Subgroup.map_comap_eq_self
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_eq_self AddSubgroup.map_comap_eq_self
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective {f : G →* N} (h : Function.Surjective f) (H : Subgroup N) :
map f (comap f H) = H :=
map_comap_eq_self ((range_top_of_surjective _ h).symm ▸ le_top)
#align subgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective Subgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective AddSubgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_le_comap_of_le_range {f : G →* N} {K L : Subgroup N} (hf : K ≤ f.range) :
K.comap f ≤ L.comap f ↔ K ≤ L :=
⟨(map_comap_eq_self hf).ge.trans ∘ map_le_iff_le_comap.mpr, comap_mono⟩
#align subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range Subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range
#align add_subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range AddSubgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_le_comap_of_surjective {f : G →* N} {K L : Subgroup N} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
K.comap f ≤ L.comap f ↔ K ≤ L :=
comap_le_comap_of_le_range (le_top.trans (f.range_top_of_surjective hf).ge)
#align subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective Subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective AddSubgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_lt_comap_of_surjective {f : G →* N} {K L : Subgroup N} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
K.comap f < L.comap f ↔ K < L := by simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, comap_le_comap_of_surjective hf]
#align subgroup.comap_lt_comap_of_surjective Subgroup.comap_lt_comap_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.comap_lt_comap_of_surjective AddSubgroup.comap_lt_comap_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_injective {f : G →* N} (h : Function.Surjective f) : Function.Injective (comap f) :=
fun K L => by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, comap_le_comap_of_surjective h, imp_self]
#align subgroup.comap_injective Subgroup.comap_injective
#align add_subgroup.comap_injective AddSubgroup.comap_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_map_eq_self {f : G →* N} {H : Subgroup G} (h : f.ker ≤ H) :
comap f (map f H) = H := by
rwa [comap_map_eq, sup_eq_left]
#align subgroup.comap_map_eq_self Subgroup.comap_map_eq_self
#align add_subgroup.comap_map_eq_self AddSubgroup.comap_map_eq_self
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_map_eq_self_of_injective {f : G →* N} (h : Function.Injective f) (H : Subgroup G) :
comap f (map f H) = H :=
comap_map_eq_self (((ker_eq_bot_iff _).mpr h).symm ▸ bot_le)
#align subgroup.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective Subgroup.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective
#align add_subgroup.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective AddSubgroup.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_map_iff {f : G →* N} {H K : Subgroup G} : H.map f ≤ K.map f ↔ H ≤ K ⊔ f.ker := by
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_eq]
#align subgroup.map_le_map_iff Subgroup.map_le_map_iff
#align add_subgroup.map_le_map_iff AddSubgroup.map_le_map_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_map_iff' {f : G →* N} {H K : Subgroup G} :
H.map f ≤ K.map f ↔ H ⊔ f.ker ≤ K ⊔ f.ker := by
simp only [map_le_map_iff, sup_le_iff, le_sup_right, and_true_iff]
#align subgroup.map_le_map_iff' Subgroup.map_le_map_iff'
#align add_subgroup.map_le_map_iff' AddSubgroup.map_le_map_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_map_iff {f : G →* N} {H K : Subgroup G} :
H.map f = K.map f ↔ H ⊔ f.ker = K ⊔ f.ker := by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, map_le_map_iff']
#align subgroup.map_eq_map_iff Subgroup.map_eq_map_iff
#align add_subgroup.map_eq_map_iff AddSubgroup.map_eq_map_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_range_iff {f : G →* N} {H : Subgroup G} :
H.map f = f.range ↔ Codisjoint H f.ker := by
rw [f.range_eq_map, map_eq_map_iff, codisjoint_iff, top_sup_eq]
#align subgroup.map_eq_range_iff Subgroup.map_eq_range_iff
#align add_subgroup.map_eq_range_iff AddSubgroup.map_eq_range_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injective {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) {H K : Subgroup G} :
H.map f ≤ K.map f ↔ H ≤ K := by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hf]
#align subgroup.map_le_map_iff_of_injective Subgroup.map_le_map_iff_of_injective
#align add_subgroup.map_le_map_iff_of_injective AddSubgroup.map_le_map_iff_of_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_subtype_le_map_subtype {G' : Subgroup G} {H K : Subgroup G'} :
H.map G'.subtype ≤ K.map G'.subtype ↔ H ≤ K :=
map_le_map_iff_of_injective <| by apply Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.map_subtype_le_map_subtype Subgroup.map_subtype_le_map_subtype
#align add_subgroup.map_subtype_le_map_subtype AddSubgroup.map_subtype_le_map_subtype
@[to_additive]
theorem map_injective {f : G →* N} (h : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective <| comap_map_eq_self_of_injective h
#align subgroup.map_injective Subgroup.map_injective
#align add_subgroup.map_injective AddSubgroup.map_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (hl : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(hr : Function.RightInverse g f) (H : Subgroup G) : map f H = comap g H :=
SetLike.ext' <| by rw [coe_map, coe_comap, Set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse hl hr]
#align subgroup.map_eq_comap_of_inverse Subgroup.map_eq_comap_of_inverse
#align add_subgroup.map_eq_comap_of_inverse AddSubgroup.map_eq_comap_of_inverse
/-- Given `f(A) = f(B)`, `ker f ≤ A`, and `ker f ≤ B`, deduce that `A = B`. -/
@[to_additive "Given `f(A) = f(B)`, `ker f ≤ A`, and `ker f ≤ B`, deduce that `A = B`."]
theorem map_injective_of_ker_le {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : f.ker ≤ H) (hK : f.ker ≤ K)
(hf : map f H = map f K) : H = K := by
apply_fun comap f at hf
rwa [comap_map_eq, comap_map_eq, sup_of_le_left hH, sup_of_le_left hK] at hf
#align subgroup.map_injective_of_ker_le Subgroup.map_injective_of_ker_le
#align add_subgroup.map_injective_of_ker_le AddSubgroup.map_injective_of_ker_le
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_preimage_eq_top (s : Set G) : closure ((closure s).subtype ⁻¹' s) = ⊤ := by
apply map_injective (closure s).subtype_injective
rw [MonoidHom.map_closure, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_map, subtype_range,
Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset]
rw [coeSubtype, Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
exact subset_closure
#align subgroup.closure_preimage_eq_top Subgroup.closure_preimage_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.closure_preimage_eq_top AddSubgroup.closure_preimage_eq_top
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_sup_eq_of_le_range {H K : Subgroup N} (hH : H ≤ f.range) (hK : K ≤ f.range) :
comap f H ⊔ comap f K = comap f (H ⊔ K) :=
map_injective_of_ker_le f ((ker_le_comap f H).trans le_sup_left) (ker_le_comap f (H ⊔ K))
(by
rw [map_comap_eq, map_sup, map_comap_eq, map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right.mpr hH,
inf_eq_right.mpr hK, inf_eq_right.mpr (sup_le hH hK)])
#align subgroup.comap_sup_eq_of_le_range Subgroup.comap_sup_eq_of_le_range
#align add_subgroup.comap_sup_eq_of_le_range AddSubgroup.comap_sup_eq_of_le_range
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_sup_eq (H K : Subgroup N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
comap f H ⊔ comap f K = comap f (H ⊔ K) :=
comap_sup_eq_of_le_range f (le_top.trans (ge_of_eq (f.range_top_of_surjective hf)))
(le_top.trans (ge_of_eq (f.range_top_of_surjective hf)))
#align subgroup.comap_sup_eq Subgroup.comap_sup_eq
#align add_subgroup.comap_sup_eq AddSubgroup.comap_sup_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem sup_subgroupOf_eq {H K L : Subgroup G} (hH : H ≤ L) (hK : K ≤ L) :
H.subgroupOf L ⊔ K.subgroupOf L = (H ⊔ K).subgroupOf L :=
comap_sup_eq_of_le_range L.subtype (hH.trans L.subtype_range.ge) (hK.trans L.subtype_range.ge)
#align subgroup.sup_subgroup_of_eq Subgroup.sup_subgroupOf_eq
#align add_subgroup.sup_add_subgroup_of_eq AddSubgroup.sup_addSubgroupOf_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem codisjoint_subgroupOf_sup (H K : Subgroup G) :
Codisjoint (H.subgroupOf (H ⊔ K)) (K.subgroupOf (H ⊔ K)) := by
rw [codisjoint_iff, sup_subgroupOf_eq, subgroupOf_self]
exacts [le_sup_left, le_sup_right]
#align subgroup.codisjoint_subgroup_of_sup Subgroup.codisjoint_subgroupOf_sup
#align add_subgroup.codisjoint_add_subgroup_of_sup AddSubgroup.codisjoint_addSubgroupOf_sup
/-- A subgroup is isomorphic to its image under an injective function. If you have an isomorphism,
use `MulEquiv.subgroupMap` for better definitional equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive subgroup is isomorphic to its image under an injective function. If you
have an isomorphism, use `AddEquiv.addSubgroupMap` for better definitional equalities."]
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (H : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
H ≃* H.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f H hf with map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (f.map_mul _ _) }
#align subgroup.equiv_map_of_injective Subgroup.equivMapOfInjective
#align add_subgroup.equiv_map_of_injective AddSubgroup.equivMapOfInjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (H : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : H) : (equivMapOfInjective H f hf h : N) = f h :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply Subgroup.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
#align add_subgroup.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply AddSubgroup.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
(by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_comap, mem_normalizer_iff] at *
intro n
rcases hf n with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp [hx y])
#align subgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective Subgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
{f : N →* G} (hf : Function.Injective f) (h : H.normalizer ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply Subgroup.map_injective hf
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
apply le_antisymm
· refine le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) (map_mono (le_normalizer_comap _))
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
· refine le_trans (le_normalizer_map f) (le_of_eq ?_)
rw [map_comap_eq_self (le_trans le_normalizer h)]
#align subgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range Subgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range
#align add_subgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H.normalizer ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer := by
apply comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range
· exact Subtype.coe_injective
simpa
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_normalizer_eq Subgroup.subgroupOf_normalizer_eq
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_normalizer_eq AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_normalizer_eq
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
erw [f.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
simp only [map_mul, map_inv]
erw [f.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align subgroup.map_equiv_normalizer_eq Subgroup.map_equiv_normalizer_eq
#align add_subgroup.map_equiv_normalizer_eq AddSubgroup.map_equiv_normalizer_eq
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
#align subgroup.map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective Subgroup.map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective
#align add_subgroup.map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective AddSubgroup.map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective
lemma isCoatom_comap_of_surjective
{H : Type*} [Group H] {φ : G →* H} (hφ : Function.Surjective φ)
{M : Subgroup H} (hM : IsCoatom M) : IsCoatom (M.comap φ) := by
refine And.imp (fun hM ↦ ?_) (fun hM ↦ ?_) hM
· rwa [← (comap_injective hφ).ne_iff, comap_top] at hM
· intro K hK
specialize hM (K.map φ)
rw [← comap_lt_comap_of_surjective hφ, ← (comap_injective hφ).eq_iff] at hM
rw [comap_map_eq_self ((M.ker_le_comap φ).trans hK.le), comap_top] at hM
exact hM hK
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
#align monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_aux MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverseAux
#align add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_aux AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverseAux
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
#align monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx => (mem_ker _).mpr <| by simp [(mem_ker _).mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
#align monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse
#align add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
#align monoid_hom.lift_of_surjective MonoidHom.liftOfSurjective
#align add_monoid_hom.lift_of_surjective AddMonoidHom.liftOfSurjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
#align monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
#align monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp
#align add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
#align monoid_hom.eq_lift_of_right_inverse MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_lift_of_right_inverse AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
#align subgroup.normal.comap Subgroup.Normal.comap
#align add_subgroup.normal.comap AddSubgroup.Normal.comap
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
#align subgroup.normal_comap Subgroup.normal_comap
#align add_subgroup.normal_comap AddSubgroup.normal_comap
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
#align subgroup.normal.subgroup_of Subgroup.Normal.subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.normal.add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.Normal.addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
#align subgroup.normal_subgroup_of Subgroup.normal_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.normal_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.normal_addSubgroupOf
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s f.symm f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
/-- The `MonoidHom` from the preimage of a subgroup to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) "the `AddMonoidHom` from the preimage of an
additive subgroup to itself."]
def subgroupComap (f : G →* G') (H' : Subgroup G') : H'.comap f →* H' :=
f.submonoidComap H'.toSubmonoid
#align monoid_hom.subgroup_comap MonoidHom.subgroupComap
#align add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_comap AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupComap
#align add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_comap_apply_coe AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupComap_apply_coe
#align monoid_hom.subgroup_comap_apply_coe MonoidHom.subgroupComap_apply_coe
/-- The `MonoidHom` from a subgroup to its image. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) "the `AddMonoidHom` from an additive subgroup to its image"]
def subgroupMap (f : G →* G') (H : Subgroup G) : H →* H.map f :=
f.submonoidMap H.toSubmonoid
#align monoid_hom.subgroup_map MonoidHom.subgroupMap
#align add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_map AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupMap
#align add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_map_apply_coe AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupMap_apply_coe
#align monoid_hom.subgroup_map_apply_coe MonoidHom.subgroupMap_apply_coe
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupMap_surjective (f : G →* G') (H : Subgroup G) :
Function.Surjective (f.subgroupMap H) :=
f.submonoidMap_surjective H.toSubmonoid
#align monoid_hom.subgroup_map_surjective MonoidHom.subgroupMap_surjective
#align add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_map_surjective AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupMap_surjective
end MonoidHom
namespace MulEquiv
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
/-- Makes the identity isomorphism from a proof two subgroups of a multiplicative
group are equal. -/
@[to_additive
"Makes the identity additive isomorphism from a proof
two subgroups of an additive group are equal."]
def subgroupCongr (h : H = K) : H ≃* K :=
{ Equiv.setCongr <| congr_arg _ h with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align mul_equiv.subgroup_congr MulEquiv.subgroupCongr
#align add_equiv.add_subgroup_congr AddEquiv.addSubgroupCongr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma subgroupCongr_apply (h : H = K) (x) :
(MulEquiv.subgroupCongr h x : G) = x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma subgroupCongr_symm_apply (h : H = K) (x) :
((MulEquiv.subgroupCongr h).symm x : G) = x := rfl
/-- A subgroup is isomorphic to its image under an isomorphism. If you only have an injective map,
use `Subgroup.equiv_map_of_injective`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive subgroup is isomorphic to its image under an isomorphism. If you only
have an injective map, use `AddSubgroup.equiv_map_of_injective`."]
def subgroupMap (e : G ≃* G') (H : Subgroup G) : H ≃* H.map (e : G →* G') :=
MulEquiv.submonoidMap (e : G ≃* G') H.toSubmonoid
#align mul_equiv.subgroup_map MulEquiv.subgroupMap
#align add_equiv.add_subgroup_map AddEquiv.addSubgroupMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_subgroupMap_apply (e : G ≃* G') (H : Subgroup G) (g : H) :
((subgroupMap e H g : H.map (e : G →* G')) : G') = e g :=
rfl
#align mul_equiv.coe_subgroup_map_apply MulEquiv.coe_subgroupMap_apply
#align add_equiv.coe_add_subgroup_map_apply AddEquiv.coe_addSubgroupMap_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupMap_symm_apply (e : G ≃* G') (H : Subgroup G) (g : H.map (e : G →* G')) :
(e.subgroupMap H).symm g = ⟨e.symm g, SetLike.mem_coe.1 <| Set.mem_image_equiv.1 g.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align mul_equiv.subgroup_map_symm_apply MulEquiv.subgroupMap_symm_apply
#align add_equiv.add_subgroup_map_symm_apply AddEquiv.addSubgroupMap_symm_apply
end MulEquiv
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem equivMapOfInjective_coe_mulEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (e : G ≃* G') :
H.equivMapOfInjective (e : G →* G') (EquivLike.injective e) = e.subgroupMap H := by
ext
rfl
#align subgroup.equiv_map_of_injective_coe_mul_equiv Subgroup.equivMapOfInjective_coe_mulEquiv
#align add_subgroup.equiv_map_of_injective_coe_add_equiv AddSubgroup.equivMapOfInjective_coe_addEquiv
variable {C : Type*} [CommGroup C] {s t : Subgroup C} {x : C}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup : x ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, ∃ z ∈ t, y * z = x :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [sup_eq_closure] at h
refine Subgroup.closure_induction h ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro y (h | h)
· exact ⟨y, h, 1, t.one_mem, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨1, s.one_mem, y, h, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨1, s.one_mem, 1, ⟨t.one_mem, mul_one 1⟩⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨y₁, hy₁, z₁, hz₁, rfl⟩ ⟨y₂, hy₂, z₂, hz₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, mul_mem hy₁ hy₂, _, mul_mem hz₁ hz₂, by simp [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]⟩
· rintro _ ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, inv_mem hy, _, inv_mem hz, mul_comm z y ▸ (mul_inv_rev z y).symm⟩, by
rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩; exact mul_mem_sup hy hz⟩
#align subgroup.mem_sup Subgroup.mem_sup
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup AddSubgroup.mem_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup' : x ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ ∃ (y : s) (z : t), (y : C) * z = x :=
mem_sup.trans <| by simp only [SetLike.exists, coe_mk, exists_prop]
#align subgroup.mem_sup' Subgroup.mem_sup'
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup' AddSubgroup.mem_sup'
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_pair {x y z : C} :
z ∈ closure ({x, y} : Set C) ↔ ∃ m n : ℤ, x ^ m * y ^ n = z := by
rw [← Set.singleton_union, Subgroup.closure_union, mem_sup]
simp_rw [mem_closure_singleton, exists_exists_eq_and]
#align subgroup.mem_closure_pair Subgroup.mem_closure_pair
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure_pair AddSubgroup.mem_closure_pair
@[to_additive]
instance : IsModularLattice (Subgroup C) :=
⟨fun {x} y z xz a ha => by
rw [mem_inf, mem_sup] at ha
rcases ha with ⟨⟨b, hb, c, hc, rfl⟩, haz⟩
rw [mem_sup]
exact ⟨b, hb, c, mem_inf.2 ⟨hc, (mul_mem_cancel_left (xz hb)).1 haz⟩, rfl⟩⟩
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
#align subgroup.normal_subgroup_of_iff Subgroup.normal_subgroupOf_iff
#align add_subgroup.normal_add_subgroup_of_iff AddSubgroup.normal_addSubgroupOf_iff
@[to_additive]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.prod_subgroup_of_prod_normal Subgroup.prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal
#align add_subgroup.sum_add_subgroup_of_sum_normal AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal
@[to_additive]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
#align subgroup.prod_normal Subgroup.prod_normal
#align add_subgroup.sum_normal AddSubgroup.sum_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G) (hB : B' ≤ B)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal :=
{ conj_mem := fun {n} hn g =>
⟨mul_mem (mul_mem (mem_inf.1 g.2).1 (mem_inf.1 n.2).1) <|
show ↑g⁻¹ ∈ A from (inv_mem (mem_inf.1 g.2).1),
(normal_subgroupOf_iff hB).mp hN n g hn.2 (mem_inf.mp g.2).2⟩ }
#align subgroup.inf_subgroup_of_inf_normal_of_right Subgroup.inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right
#align add_subgroup.inf_add_subgroup_of_inf_normal_of_right AddSubgroup.inf_addSubgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G) (hA : A' ≤ A)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal :=
{ conj_mem := fun n hn g =>
⟨(normal_subgroupOf_iff hA).mp hN n g hn.1 (mem_inf.mp g.2).1,
mul_mem (mul_mem (mem_inf.1 g.2).2 (mem_inf.1 n.2).2) <|
show ↑g⁻¹ ∈ B from (inv_mem (mem_inf.1 g.2).2)⟩ }
#align subgroup.inf_subgroup_of_inf_normal_of_left Subgroup.inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left
#align add_subgroup.inf_add_subgroup_of_inf_normal_of_left AddSubgroup.inf_addSubgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
#align subgroup.normal_inf_normal Subgroup.normal_inf_normal
#align add_subgroup.normal_inf_normal AddSubgroup.normal_inf_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_sup (A A' B : Subgroup G) (hA : A ≤ B) (hA' : A' ≤ B) :
(A ⊔ A').subgroupOf B = A.subgroupOf B ⊔ A'.subgroupOf B := by
refine
map_injective_of_ker_le B.subtype (ker_le_comap _ _)
(le_trans (ker_le_comap B.subtype _) le_sup_left) ?_
simp only [subgroupOf, map_comap_eq, map_sup, subtype_range]
rw [inf_of_le_right (sup_le hA hA'), inf_of_le_right hA', inf_of_le_right hA]
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_sup Subgroup.subgroupOf_sup
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_sup AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_right_inv, mul_one] at this
#align subgroup.subgroup_normal.mem_comm Subgroup.SubgroupNormal.mem_comm
#align add_subgroup.subgroup_normal.mem_comm AddSubgroup.SubgroupNormal.mem_comm
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
-- Porting note: Previous code was:
-- simpa
simp only [this, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
#align subgroup.commute_of_normal_of_disjoint Subgroup.commute_of_normal_of_disjoint
#align add_subgroup.commute_of_normal_of_disjoint AddSubgroup.addCommute_of_normal_of_disjoint
end SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem disjoint_def {H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G} : Disjoint H₁ H₂ ↔ ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ H₁ → x ∈ H₂ → x = 1 :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.trans <| by simp only [Disjoint, SetLike.le_def, mem_inf, mem_bot, and_imp]
#align subgroup.disjoint_def Subgroup.disjoint_def
#align add_subgroup.disjoint_def AddSubgroup.disjoint_def
@[to_additive]
theorem disjoint_def' {H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G} :
Disjoint H₁ H₂ ↔ ∀ {x y : G}, x ∈ H₁ → y ∈ H₂ → x = y → x = 1 :=
disjoint_def.trans ⟨fun h _x _y hx hy hxy ↦ h hx <| hxy.symm ▸ hy, fun h _x hx hx' ↦ h hx hx' rfl⟩
#align subgroup.disjoint_def' Subgroup.disjoint_def'
#align add_subgroup.disjoint_def' AddSubgroup.disjoint_def'
@[to_additive]
theorem disjoint_iff_mul_eq_one {H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G} :
Disjoint H₁ H₂ ↔ ∀ {x y : G}, x ∈ H₁ → y ∈ H₂ → x * y = 1 → x = 1 ∧ y = 1 :=
disjoint_def'.trans
⟨fun h x y hx hy hxy =>
let hx1 : x = 1 := h hx (H₂.inv_mem hy) (eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one.mpr hxy)
⟨hx1, by simpa [hx1] using hxy⟩,
fun h x y hx hy hxy => (h hx (H₂.inv_mem hy) (mul_inv_eq_one.mpr hxy)).1⟩
#align subgroup.disjoint_iff_mul_eq_one Subgroup.disjoint_iff_mul_eq_one
#align add_subgroup.disjoint_iff_add_eq_zero AddSubgroup.disjoint_iff_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_injective_of_disjoint {H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G} (h : Disjoint H₁ H₂) :
Function.Injective (fun g => g.1 * g.2 : H₁ × H₂ → G) := by
intro x y hxy
rw [← inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_eq_one, mul_assoc] at hxy
replace hxy := disjoint_iff_mul_eq_one.mp h (y.1⁻¹ * x.1).prop (x.2 * y.2⁻¹).prop hxy
rwa [coe_mul, coe_mul, coe_inv, coe_inv, inv_mul_eq_one, mul_inv_eq_one, ← Subtype.ext_iff, ←
Subtype.ext_iff, eq_comm, ← Prod.ext_iff] at hxy
#align subgroup.mul_injective_of_disjoint Subgroup.mul_injective_of_disjoint
#align add_subgroup.add_injective_of_disjoint AddSubgroup.add_injective_of_disjoint
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 3,668 | 3,688 | theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by |
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_top_of_surjective _ hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_mod self_sub_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ico_div_zsmul toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ioc_div_zsmul toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ico_mod toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ioc_mod toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_iff toIcoMod_eq_iff
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_iff toIocMod_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_left toIcoDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_left toIocDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_left toIcoMod_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_left toIocMod_apply_left
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_right toIcoDiv_apply_right
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_right toIocDiv_apply_right
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_right toIcoMod_apply_right
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_right toIocMod_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul toIcoDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul' toIcoDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul toIocDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul' toIocDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_add toIcoDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_add toIocDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul' toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul toIocDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul' toIocDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right toIcoDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right' toIcoDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right toIocDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right' toIocDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ico_div_add_left toIcoDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ico_div_add_left' toIcoDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left toIocDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left' toIocDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub toIcoDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub' toIcoDiv_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub toIocDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub' toIocDiv_sub'
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add' toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add'
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add' toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add'
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
#align to_Ico_div_neg toIcoDiv_neg
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ico_div_neg' toIcoDiv_neg'
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_neg toIocDiv_neg
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ioc_div_neg' toIocDiv_neg'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul toIcoMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul' toIcoMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul toIocMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul' toIocMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add toIcoMod_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add' toIcoMod_zsmul_add'
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 442 | 443 | theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by |
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Maximal
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2bbc7e3884ba234309d2a43b19144105a753292e"
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Frölich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
#align fractional_ideal.inv_eq FractionalIdeal.inv_eq
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
#align fractional_ideal.inv_zero' FractionalIdeal.inv_zero'
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
#align fractional_ideal.inv_nonzero FractionalIdeal.inv_nonzero
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_inv_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.coe_inv_of_nonzero
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
#align fractional_ideal.mem_inv_iff FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
#align fractional_ideal.inv_anti_mono FractionalIdeal.inv_anti_mono
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
#align fractional_ideal.le_self_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.le_self_mul_inv
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hx hy
#align fractional_ideal.right_inverse_eq FractionalIdeal.right_inverse_eq
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel_iff
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel_iff_is_unit FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 136 | 137 | theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by | rw [inv_eq, map_div, map_one, inv_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.NAry
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter
#align_import order.filter.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3d9ab8faa9dea8f78155c6c27d62a621f4c152d"
/-!
# Pointwise operations on filters
This file defines pointwise operations on filters. This is useful because usual algebraic operations
distribute over pointwise operations. For example,
* `(f₁ * f₂).map m = f₁.map m * f₂.map m`
* `𝓝 (x * y) = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y`
## Main declarations
* `0` (`Filter.instZero`): Pure filter at `0 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `0 : Set α`.
* `1` (`Filter.instOne`): Pure filter at `1 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `1 : Set α`.
* `f + g` (`Filter.instAdd`): Addition, filter generated by all `s + t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f * g` (`Filter.instMul`): Multiplication, filter generated by all `s * t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `-f` (`Filter.instNeg`): Negation, filter of all `-s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f⁻¹` (`Filter.instInv`): Inversion, filter of all `s⁻¹` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f - g` (`Filter.instSub`): Subtraction, filter generated by all `s - t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f / g` (`Filter.instDiv`): Division, filter generated by all `s / t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f +ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVAdd`): Scalar addition, filter generated by all `s +ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f -ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVSub`): Scalar subtraction, filter generated by all `s -ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f`
and `t ∈ g`.
* `f • g` (`Filter.instSMul`): Scalar multiplication, filter generated by all `s • t` where
`s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `a +ᵥ f` (`Filter.instVAddFilter`): Translation, filter of all `a +ᵥ s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `a • f` (`Filter.instSMulFilter`): Scaling, filter of all `a • s` where `s ∈ f`.
For `α` a semigroup/monoid, `Filter α` is a semigroup/monoid.
As an unfortunate side effect, this means that `n • f`, where `n : ℕ`, is ambiguous between
pointwise scaling and repeated pointwise addition. See note [pointwise nat action].
## Implementation notes
We put all instances in the locale `Pointwise`, so that these instances are not available by
default. Note that we do not mark them as reducible (as argued by note [reducible non-instances])
since we expect the locale to be open whenever the instances are actually used (and making the
instances reducible changes the behavior of `simp`).
## Tags
filter multiplication, filter addition, pointwise addition, pointwise multiplication,
-/
open Function Set Filter Pointwise
variable {F α β γ δ ε : Type*}
namespace Filter
/-! ### `0`/`1` as filters -/
section One
variable [One α] {f : Filter α} {s : Set α}
/-- `1 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `1 : α` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"`0 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `0 : α` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instOne : One (Filter α) :=
⟨pure 1⟩
#align filter.has_one Filter.instOne
#align filter.has_zero Filter.instZero
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instOne Filter.instZero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_one : s ∈ (1 : Filter α) ↔ (1 : α) ∈ s :=
mem_pure
#align filter.mem_one Filter.mem_one
#align filter.mem_zero Filter.mem_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one : (1 : Set α) ∈ (1 : Filter α) :=
mem_pure.2 Set.one_mem_one
#align filter.one_mem_one Filter.one_mem_one
#align filter.zero_mem_zero Filter.zero_mem_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_one : pure 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
rfl
#align filter.pure_one Filter.pure_one
#align filter.pure_zero Filter.pure_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem principal_one : 𝓟 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
principal_singleton _
#align filter.principal_one Filter.principal_one
#align filter.principal_zero Filter.principal_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_neBot : (1 : Filter α).NeBot :=
Filter.pure_neBot
#align filter.one_ne_bot Filter.one_neBot
#align filter.zero_ne_bot Filter.zero_neBot
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] one_neBot zero_neBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_one' (f : α → β) : (1 : Filter α).map f = pure (f 1) :=
rfl
#align filter.map_one' Filter.map_one'
#align filter.map_zero' Filter.map_zero'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_one_iff : f ≤ 1 ↔ (1 : Set α) ∈ f :=
le_pure_iff
#align filter.le_one_iff Filter.le_one_iff
#align filter.nonpos_iff Filter.nonpos_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.le_one_iff (h : f.NeBot) : f ≤ 1 ↔ f = 1 :=
h.le_pure_iff
#align filter.ne_bot.le_one_iff Filter.NeBot.le_one_iff
#align filter.ne_bot.nonpos_iff Filter.NeBot.nonpos_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventually_one {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 1, p x) ↔ p 1 :=
eventually_pure
#align filter.eventually_one Filter.eventually_one
#align filter.eventually_zero Filter.eventually_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tendsto_one {a : Filter β} {f : β → α} : Tendsto f a 1 ↔ ∀ᶠ x in a, f x = 1 :=
tendsto_pure
#align filter.tendsto_one Filter.tendsto_one
#align filter.tendsto_zero Filter.tendsto_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_prod_one [One β] : (1 : Filter α) ×ˢ (1 : Filter β) = 1 :=
prod_pure_pure
#align filter.one_prod_one Filter.one_prod_one
#align filter.zero_sum_zero Filter.zero_sum_zero
/-- `pure` as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`pure` as a `ZeroHom`."]
def pureOneHom : OneHom α (Filter α) where
toFun := pure; map_one' := pure_one
#align filter.pure_one_hom Filter.pureOneHom
#align filter.pure_zero_hom Filter.pureZeroHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureOneHom : (pureOneHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
#align filter.coe_pure_one_hom Filter.coe_pureOneHom
#align filter.coe_pure_zero_hom Filter.coe_pureZeroHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureOneHom_apply (a : α) : pureOneHom a = pure a :=
rfl
#align filter.pure_one_hom_apply Filter.pureOneHom_apply
#align filter.pure_zero_hom_apply Filter.pureZeroHom_apply
variable [One β]
@[to_additive]
-- Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it.
protected theorem map_one [FunLike F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (φ : F) : map φ 1 = 1 := by
rw [Filter.map_one', map_one, pure_one]
#align filter.map_one Filter.map_one
#align filter.map_zero Filter.map_zero
end One
/-! ### Filter negation/inversion -/
section Inv
variable [Inv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α}
/-- The inverse of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `⁻¹` of its sets. -/
@[to_additive "The negation of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `-` of its sets."]
instance instInv : Inv (Filter α) :=
⟨map Inv.inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_inv : f.map Inv.inv = f⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align filter.map_inv Filter.map_inv
#align filter.map_neg Filter.map_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_inv : s ∈ f⁻¹ ↔ Inv.inv ⁻¹' s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inv Filter.mem_inv
#align filter.mem_neg Filter.mem_neg
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_le_inv (hf : f ≤ g) : f⁻¹ ≤ g⁻¹ :=
map_mono hf
#align filter.inv_le_inv Filter.inv_le_inv
#align filter.neg_le_neg Filter.neg_le_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_pure : (pure a : Filter α)⁻¹ = pure a⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align filter.inv_pure Filter.inv_pure
#align filter.neg_pure Filter.neg_pure
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_bot_iff : f⁻¹ = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
map_eq_bot_iff
#align filter.inv_eq_bot_iff Filter.inv_eq_bot_iff
#align filter.neg_eq_bot_iff Filter.neg_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem neBot_inv_iff : f⁻¹.NeBot ↔ NeBot f :=
map_neBot_iff _
#align filter.ne_bot_inv_iff Filter.neBot_inv_iff
#align filter.ne_bot_neg_iff Filter.neBot_neg_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.inv : f.NeBot → f⁻¹.NeBot := fun h => h.map _
#align filter.ne_bot.inv Filter.NeBot.inv
#align filter.ne_bot.neg Filter.NeBot.neg
@[to_additive neg.instNeBot]
lemma inv.instNeBot [NeBot f] : NeBot f⁻¹ := .inv ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] inv.instNeBot neg.instNeBot
end Inv
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected lemma comap_inv : comap Inv.inv f = f⁻¹ :=
.symm <| map_eq_comap_of_inverse (inv_comp_inv _) (inv_comp_inv _)
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Pointwise.lean | 248 | 248 | theorem inv_mem_inv (hs : s ∈ f) : s⁻¹ ∈ f⁻¹ := by | rwa [mem_inv, inv_preimage, inv_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
/-! We specialize the theory fo analytic functions to the case of functions that admit a
development given by a *finite* formal multilinear series. We call them "continuously polynomial",
which is abbreviated to `CPolynomial`. One reason to do that is that we no longer need a
completeness assumption on the target space `F` to make the series converge, so some of the results
are more general. The class of continuously polynomial functions includes functions defined by
polynomials on a normed `𝕜`-algebra and continuous multilinear maps.
## Main definitions
Let `p` be a formal multilinear series from `E` to `F`, i.e., `p n` is a multilinear map on `E^n`
for `n : ℕ`, and let `f` be a function from `E` to `F`.
* `HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r`: on the ball of center `x` with radius `r`,
`f (x + y) = ∑'_n pₘ yᵐ`, and moreover `pₘ = 0` if `n ≤ m`.
* `HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n`: on some ball of center `x` with positive radius, holds
`HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r`.
* `CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x`: there exists a power series `p` and a natural number `n` such that
holds `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x n`.
* `CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s`: the function `f` is analytic at every point of `s`.
We develop the basic properties of these notions, notably:
* If a function is continuously polynomial, then it is analytic, see
`HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`, `HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.hasFPowerSeriesAt`,
`CPolynomialAt.analyticAt` and `CPolynomialOn.analyticOn`.
* The sum of a finite formal power series with positive radius is well defined on the whole space,
see `FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_of_finite`.
* If a function admits a finite power series in a ball, then it is continuously polynomial at
any point `y` of this ball, and the power series there can be expressed in terms of the initial
power series `p` as `p.changeOrigin y`, which is finite (with the same bound as `p`) by
`changeOrigin_finite_of_finite`. See `HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.changeOrigin `. It follows in
particular that the set of points at which a given function is continuously polynomial is open,
see `isOpen_cPolynomialAt`.
-/
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal
open Set Filter Asymptotics
variable {f g : E → F} {p pf pg : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E} {r r' : ℝ≥0∞} {n m : ℕ}
section FiniteFPowerSeries
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, a formal multilinear series `p` and `n : ℕ`, we say that
`f` has `p` as a finite power series on the ball of radius `r > 0` around `x` if
`f (x + y) = ∑' pₘ yᵐ` for all `‖y‖ < r` and `pₙ = 0` for `n ≤ m`. -/
structure HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E)
(n : ℕ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) extends HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r : Prop where
finite : ∀ (m : ℕ), n ≤ m → p m = 0
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.mk' {f : E → F} {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E}
{n : ℕ} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (finite : ∀ (m : ℕ), n ≤ m → p m = 0) (pos : 0 < r)
(sum_eq : ∀ y ∈ EMetric.ball 0 r, (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, p i fun _ ↦ y) = f (x + y)) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r where
r_le := p.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero (Filter.eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, finite⟩) ▸ le_top
r_pos := pos
hasSum hy := sum_eq _ hy ▸ hasSum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero fun m hm ↦ by
rw [Finset.mem_range, not_lt] at hm; rw [finite m hm]; rfl
finite := finite
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, a formal multilinear series `p` and `n : ℕ`, we say that
`f` has `p` as a finite power series around `x` if `f (x + y) = ∑' pₙ yⁿ` for all `y` in a
neighborhood of `0`and `pₙ = 0` for `n ≤ m`. -/
def HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ r, HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.toHasFPowerSeriesAt
(hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n) : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x :=
let ⟨r, hf⟩ := hf
⟨r, hf.toHasFPowerSeriesOnBall⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.finite (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n) :
∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → p m = 0 := let ⟨_, hf⟩ := hf; hf.finite
variable (𝕜)
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, we say that `f` is continuously polynomial (cpolynomial)
at `x` if it admits a finite power series expansion around `x`. -/
def CPolynomialAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ), HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, we say that `f` is continuously polynomial on a set `s`
if it is continuously polynomial around every point of `s`. -/
def CPolynomialOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x, x ∈ s → CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt
(hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n :=
⟨r, hf⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.cPolynomialAt (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨p, n, hf⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.cPolynomialAt (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.cPolynomialAt
theorem CPolynomialAt.analyticAt (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x :=
let ⟨p, _, hp⟩ := hf
⟨p, hp.toHasFPowerSeriesAt⟩
theorem CPolynomialOn.analyticOn {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).analyticAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.congr (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r)
(hg : EqOn f g (EMetric.ball x r)) : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g p x n r :=
⟨hf.1.congr hg, hf.finite⟩
/-- If a function `f` has a finite power series `p` around `x`, then the function
`z ↦ f (z - y)` has the same finite power series around `x + y`. -/
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.comp_sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r) (y : E) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun z => f (z - y)) p (x + y) n r :=
⟨hf.1.comp_sub y, hf.finite⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.mono (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r)
(r'_pos : 0 < r') (hr : r' ≤ r) : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r' :=
⟨hf.1.mono r'_pos hr, hf.finite⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.congr (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g p x n :=
Exists.imp (fun _ hg ↦ ⟨hg, hf.finite⟩) (hf.toHasFPowerSeriesAt.congr hg)
protected theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.eventually (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f p x n) :
∀ᶠ r : ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝[>] 0, HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r :=
hf.toHasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually.mono fun _ h ↦ ⟨h, hf.finite⟩
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 ⊤ :=
⟨hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const, fun n hn ↦ constFormalMultilinearSeries_apply (id hn : 0 < n).ne'⟩
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 :=
⟨⊤, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt_const {v : F} : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (fun _ => v) x :=
⟨constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v, 1, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialOn_const {v : F} {s : Set E} : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s :=
fun _ _ => CPolynomialAt_const
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) r :=
⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun N hN ↦ by
rw [Pi.add_apply, hf.finite _ ((le_max_left n m).trans hN),
hg.finite _ ((le_max_right n m).trans hN), zero_add]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) := by
rcases (hf.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr.1.add hr.2⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt.congr (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
(hpf.congr hg).cPolynomialAt
theorem CPolynomialAt_congr (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x ↔ CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.congr h, fun hg ↦ hg.congr h.symm⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt.add (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f + g) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
let ⟨_, _, hqf⟩ := hg
(hpf.add hqf).cPolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (-f) (-pf) x n r :=
⟨hf.1.neg, fun m hm ↦ by rw [Pi.neg_apply, hf.finite m hm, neg_zero]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (-f) (-pf) x n :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.neg.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt
theorem CPolynomialAt.neg (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (-f) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
hpf.neg.cPolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) r := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialAt.sub (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f - g) x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialOn.mono {s t : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f t) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun z hz => hf z (hst hz)
theorem CPolynomialOn.congr' {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).congr (mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mp hg z hz)
theorem CPolynomialOn_congr' {s : Set E} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s ↔ CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr' h, fun hg => hg.congr' h.symm⟩
theorem CPolynomialOn.congr {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s)
(hg : s.EqOn f g) : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s :=
hf.congr' <| mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mpr
(fun _ hz => eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem.mpr ⟨s, hs.mem_nhds hz, hg⟩)
theorem CPolynomialOn_congr {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) (h : s.EqOn f g) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s ↔ CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr hs h, fun hg => hg.congr hs h.symm⟩
theorem CPolynomialOn.add {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f + g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).add (hg z hz)
theorem CPolynomialOn.sub {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f - g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).sub (hg z hz)
/-- If a function `f` has a finite power series `p` on a ball and `g` is a continuous linear map,
then `g ∘ f` has the finite power series `g ∘ p` on the same ball. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(h : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (g ∘ f) (g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p) x n r :=
⟨g.comp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall h.1, fun m hm ↦ by
rw [compFormalMultilinearSeries_apply, h.finite m hm]
ext; exact map_zero g⟩
/-- If a function `f` is continuously polynomial on a set `s` and `g` is a continuous linear map,
then `g ∘ f` is continuously polynomial on `s`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/CPolynomial.lean | 248 | 252 | theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_cPolynomialOn {s : Set E} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(h : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s := by |
rintro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨p, n, r, hp⟩
exact ⟨g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p, n, r, g.comp_hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall hp⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.SplitSimplicialObject
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.functor_gamma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
/-!
# Construction of the inverse functor of the Dold-Kan equivalence
In this file, we construct the functor `Γ₀ : ChainComplex C ℕ ⥤ SimplicialObject C`
which shall be the inverse functor of the Dold-Kan equivalence in the case of abelian categories,
and more generally pseudoabelian categories.
By definition, when `K` is a chain_complex, `Γ₀.obj K` is a simplicial object which
sends `Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ` to a certain coproduct indexed by the set
`Splitting.IndexSet Δ` whose elements consists of epimorphisms `e : Δ.unop ⟶ Δ'.unop`
(with `Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ`); the summand attached to such an `e` is `K.X Δ'.unop.len`.
By construction, `Γ₀.obj K` is a split simplicial object whose splitting is `Γ₀.splitting K`.
We also construct `Γ₂ : Karoubi (ChainComplex C ℕ) ⥤ Karoubi (SimplicialObject C)`
which shall be an equivalence for any additive category `C`.
(See `Equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan equivalence.)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits SimplexCategory
SimplicialObject Opposite CategoryTheory.Idempotents Simplicial DoldKan
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] (K K' : ChainComplex C ℕ) (f : K ⟶ K')
{Δ Δ' Δ'' : SimplexCategory}
/-- `Isδ₀ i` is a simple condition used to check whether a monomorphism `i` in
`SimplexCategory` identifies to the coface map `δ 0`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Isδ₀ {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategory} (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] : Prop :=
Δ.len = Δ'.len + 1 ∧ i.toOrderHom 0 ≠ 0
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.is_δ₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Isδ₀
namespace Isδ₀
theorem iff {j : ℕ} {i : Fin (j + 2)} : Isδ₀ (SimplexCategory.δ i) ↔ i = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, h₂⟩
by_contra h
exact h₂ (Fin.succAbove_ne_zero_zero h)
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, by dsimp; exact Fin.succ_ne_zero (0 : Fin (j + 1))⟩
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.is_δ₀.iff AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Isδ₀.iff
theorem eq_δ₀ {n : ℕ} {i : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n + 1]} [Mono i] (hi : Isδ₀ i) :
i = SimplexCategory.δ 0 := by
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ := SimplexCategory.eq_δ_of_mono i
rw [iff] at hi
rw [hi]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.is_δ₀.eq_δ₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Isδ₀.eq_δ₀
end Isδ₀
namespace Γ₀
namespace Obj
/-- In the definition of `(Γ₀.obj K).obj Δ` as a direct sum indexed by `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ`,
the summand `summand K Δ A` is `K.X A.1.len`. -/
def summand (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) : C :=
K.X A.1.unop.len
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.summand AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.summand
/-- The functor `Γ₀` sends a chain complex `K` to the simplicial object which
sends `Δ` to the direct sum of the objects `summand K Δ A` for all `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ` -/
def obj₂ (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) [HasFiniteCoproducts C] : C :=
∐ fun A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ => summand K Δ A
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.obj₂ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.obj₂
namespace Termwise
/-- A monomorphism `i : Δ' ⟶ Δ` induces a morphism `K.X Δ.len ⟶ K.X Δ'.len` which
is the identity if `Δ = Δ'`, the differential on the complex `K` if `i = δ 0`, and
zero otherwise. -/
def mapMono (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) {Δ' Δ : SimplexCategory} (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] :
K.X Δ.len ⟶ K.X Δ'.len := by
by_cases Δ = Δ'
· exact eqToHom (by congr)
· by_cases Isδ₀ i
· exact K.d Δ.len Δ'.len
· exact 0
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono
variable (Δ)
theorem mapMono_id : mapMono K (𝟙 Δ) = 𝟙 _ := by
unfold mapMono
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, eqToHom_refl, dite_eq_ite, if_true]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_id AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id
variable {Δ}
theorem mapMono_δ₀' (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] (hi : Isδ₀ i) : mapMono K i = K.d Δ.len Δ'.len := by
unfold mapMono
suffices Δ ≠ Δ' by
simp only [dif_neg this, dif_pos hi]
rintro rfl
simpa only [self_eq_add_right, Nat.one_ne_zero] using hi.1
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_δ₀' AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_δ₀'
@[simp]
theorem mapMono_δ₀ {n : ℕ} : mapMono K (δ (0 : Fin (n + 2))) = K.d (n + 1) n :=
mapMono_δ₀' K _ (by rw [Isδ₀.iff])
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_δ₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_δ₀
theorem mapMono_eq_zero (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] (h₁ : Δ ≠ Δ') (h₂ : ¬Isδ₀ i) : mapMono K i = 0 := by
unfold mapMono
rw [Ne] at h₁
split_ifs
rfl
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_eq_zero AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_eq_zero
variable {K K'}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mapMono_naturality (i : Δ ⟶ Δ') [Mono i] :
mapMono K i ≫ f.f Δ.len = f.f Δ'.len ≫ mapMono K' i := by
unfold mapMono
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp only [id_comp, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
· rw [HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm]
· rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_naturality AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_naturality
variable (K)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mapMono_comp (i' : Δ'' ⟶ Δ') (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i'] [Mono i] :
mapMono K i ≫ mapMono K i' = mapMono K (i' ≫ i) := by
-- case where i : Δ' ⟶ Δ is the identity
by_cases h₁ : Δ = Δ'
· subst h₁
simp only [SimplexCategory.eq_id_of_mono i, comp_id, id_comp, mapMono_id K, eqToHom_refl]
-- case where i' : Δ'' ⟶ Δ' is the identity
by_cases h₂ : Δ' = Δ''
· subst h₂
simp only [SimplexCategory.eq_id_of_mono i', comp_id, id_comp, mapMono_id K, eqToHom_refl]
-- then the RHS is always zero
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt (len_lt_of_mono i h₁)
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt (len_lt_of_mono i' h₂)
have eq : Δ.len = Δ''.len + (k + k' + 2) := by omega
rw [mapMono_eq_zero K (i' ≫ i) _ _]; rotate_left
· by_contra h
simp only [self_eq_add_right, h, add_eq_zero_iff, and_false] at eq
· by_contra h
simp only [h.1, add_right_inj] at eq
omega
-- in all cases, the LHS is also zero, either by definition, or because d ≫ d = 0
by_cases h₃ : Isδ₀ i
· by_cases h₄ : Isδ₀ i'
· rw [mapMono_δ₀' K i h₃, mapMono_δ₀' K i' h₄, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d]
· simp only [mapMono_eq_zero K i' h₂ h₄, comp_zero]
· simp only [mapMono_eq_zero K i h₁ h₃, zero_comp]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_comp AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_comp
end Termwise
variable [HasFiniteCoproducts C]
/-- The simplicial morphism on the simplicial object `Γ₀.obj K` induced by
a morphism `Δ' → Δ` in `SimplexCategory` is defined on each summand
associated to an `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ` in terms of the epi-mono factorisation
of `θ ≫ A.e`. -/
def map (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) {Δ' Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ') : obj₂ K Δ ⟶ obj₂ K Δ' :=
Sigma.desc fun A =>
Termwise.mapMono K (image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e)) ≫ Sigma.ι (summand K Δ') (A.pull θ)
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map
@[reassoc]
theorem map_on_summand₀ {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) {θ : Δ ⟶ Δ'}
{Δ'' : SimplexCategory} {e : Δ'.unop ⟶ Δ''} {i : Δ'' ⟶ A.1.unop} [Epi e] [Mono i]
(fac : e ≫ i = θ.unop ≫ A.e) :
Sigma.ι (summand K Δ) A ≫ map K θ =
Termwise.mapMono K i ≫ Sigma.ι (summand K Δ') (Splitting.IndexSet.mk e) := by
simp only [map, colimit.ι_desc, Cofan.mk_ι_app]
have h := SimplexCategory.image_eq fac
subst h
congr
· exact SimplexCategory.image_ι_eq fac
· dsimp only [SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.pull]
congr
exact SimplexCategory.factorThruImage_eq fac
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_on_summand₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀
@[reassoc]
theorem map_on_summand₀' {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ') :
Sigma.ι (summand K Δ) A ≫ map K θ =
Termwise.mapMono K (image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e)) ≫ Sigma.ι (summand K _) (A.pull θ) :=
map_on_summand₀ K A (A.fac_pull θ)
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_on_summand₀' AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀'
end Obj
variable [HasFiniteCoproducts C]
/-- The functor `Γ₀ : ChainComplex C ℕ ⥤ SimplicialObject C`, on objects. -/
@[simps]
def obj (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) : SimplicialObject C where
obj Δ := Obj.obj₂ K Δ
map θ := Obj.map K θ
map_id Δ := colimit.hom_ext (fun ⟨A⟩ => by
dsimp
have fac : A.e ≫ 𝟙 A.1.unop = (𝟙 Δ).unop ≫ A.e := by rw [unop_id, comp_id, id_comp]
erw [Obj.map_on_summand₀ K A fac, Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl)
map_comp {Δ'' Δ' Δ} θ' θ := colimit.hom_ext (fun ⟨A⟩ => by
have fac : θ.unop ≫ θ'.unop ≫ A.e = (θ' ≫ θ).unop ≫ A.e := by rw [unop_comp, assoc]
rw [← image.fac (θ'.unop ≫ A.e), ← assoc, ←
image.fac (θ.unop ≫ factorThruImage (θ'.unop ≫ A.e)), assoc] at fac
simp only [Obj.map_on_summand₀'_assoc K A θ', Obj.map_on_summand₀' K _ θ,
Obj.Termwise.mapMono_comp_assoc, Obj.map_on_summand₀ K A fac]
rfl)
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.obj
/-- By construction, the simplicial `Γ₀.obj K` is equipped with a splitting. -/
def splitting (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) : SimplicialObject.Splitting (Γ₀.obj K) where
N n := K.X n
ι n := Sigma.ι (Γ₀.Obj.summand K (op [n])) (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op [n]))
isColimit' Δ := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (colimit.isColimit _) (Cofan.ext (Iso.refl _) (by
intro A
dsimp [Splitting.cofan']
rw [comp_id, Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀ K (SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.id A.1)
(show A.e ≫ 𝟙 _ = A.e.op.unop ≫ 𝟙 _ by rfl), Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id]
dsimp
rw [id_comp]
rfl))
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.splitting AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.splitting
@[reassoc]
theorem Obj.map_on_summand {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ')
{Δ'' : SimplexCategory} {e : Δ'.unop ⟶ Δ''} {i : Δ'' ⟶ A.1.unop} [Epi e] [Mono i]
(fac : e ≫ i = θ.unop ≫ A.e) :
((Γ₀.splitting K).cofan Δ).inj A ≫ (Γ₀.obj K).map θ =
Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono K i ≫ ((Γ₀.splitting K).cofan Δ').inj (Splitting.IndexSet.mk e) := by
dsimp [Splitting.cofan]
change (_ ≫ (Γ₀.obj K).map A.e.op) ≫ (Γ₀.obj K).map θ = _
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
dsimp [splitting]
erw [Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀ K (Splitting.IndexSet.id A.1)
(show e ≫ i = ((Splitting.IndexSet.e A).op ≫ θ).unop ≫ 𝟙 _ by rw [comp_id, fac]; rfl),
Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀ K (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op Δ''))
(show e ≫ 𝟙 Δ'' = e.op.unop ≫ 𝟙 _ by simp), Termwise.mapMono_id, id_comp]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_on_summand AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand
@[reassoc]
theorem Obj.map_on_summand' {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ') :
((splitting K).cofan Δ).inj A ≫ (obj K).map θ =
Obj.Termwise.mapMono K (image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e)) ≫
((splitting K).cofan Δ').inj (A.pull θ) := by
apply Obj.map_on_summand
apply image.fac
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_on_summand' AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand'
@[reassoc]
theorem Obj.mapMono_on_summand_id {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategory} (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] :
((splitting K).cofan _).inj (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op Δ)) ≫ (obj K).map i.op =
Obj.Termwise.mapMono K i ≫ ((splitting K).cofan _).inj (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op Δ')) :=
Obj.map_on_summand K (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op Δ)) i.op (rfl : 𝟙 _ ≫ i = i ≫ 𝟙 _)
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_mono_on_summand_id AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.mapMono_on_summand_id
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/FunctorGamma.lean | 282 | 287 | theorem Obj.map_epi_on_summand_id {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategory} (e : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Epi e] :
((Γ₀.splitting K).cofan _).inj (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op Δ)) ≫ (Γ₀.obj K).map e.op =
((Γ₀.splitting K).cofan _).inj (Splitting.IndexSet.mk e) := by |
simpa only [Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand K (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op Δ)) e.op
(rfl : e ≫ 𝟙 Δ = e ≫ 𝟙 Δ),
Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id] using id_comp _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
#align_import topology.separation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
/-!
# Separation properties of topological spaces.
This file defines the predicate `SeparatedNhds`, and common separation axioms
(under the Kolmogorov classification).
## Main definitions
* `SeparatedNhds`: Two `Set`s are separated by neighbourhoods if they are contained in disjoint
open sets.
* `T0Space`: A T₀/Kolmogorov space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is an open set that contains one, but not the other.
* `R0Space`: An R₀ space (sometimes called a *symmetric space*) is a topological space
such that the `Specializes` relation is symmetric.
* `T1Space`: A T₁/Fréchet space is a space where every singleton set is closed.
This is equivalent to, for every pair `x ≠ y`, there existing an open set containing `x`
but not `y` (`t1Space_iff_exists_open` shows that these conditions are equivalent.)
T₁ implies T₀ and R₀.
* `R1Space`: An R₁/preregular space is a space where any two topologically distinguishable points
have disjoint neighbourhoods. R₁ implies R₀.
* `T2Space`: A T₂/Hausdorff space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is two disjoint open sets, one containing `x`, and the other `y`. T₂ implies T₁ and R₁.
* `T25Space`: A T₂.₅/Urysohn space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is two open sets, one containing `x`, and the other `y`, whose closures are disjoint.
T₂.₅ implies T₂.
* `RegularSpace`: A regular space is one where, given any closed `C` and `x ∉ C`,
there are disjoint open sets containing `x` and `C` respectively. Such a space is not necessarily
Hausdorff.
* `T3Space`: A T₃ space is a regular T₀ space. T₃ implies T₂.₅.
* `NormalSpace`: A normal space, is one where given two disjoint closed sets,
we can find two open sets that separate them. Such a space is not necessarily Hausdorff, even if
it is T₀.
* `T4Space`: A T₄ space is a normal T₁ space. T₄ implies T₃.
* `CompletelyNormalSpace`: A completely normal space is one in which for any two sets `s`, `t`
such that if both `closure s` is disjoint with `t`, and `s` is disjoint with `closure t`,
then there exist disjoint neighbourhoods of `s` and `t`. `Embedding.completelyNormalSpace` allows
us to conclude that this is equivalent to all subspaces being normal. Such a space is not
necessarily Hausdorff or regular, even if it is T₀.
* `T5Space`: A T₅ space is a completely normal T₁ space. T₅ implies T₄.
Note that `mathlib` adopts the modern convention that `m ≤ n` if and only if `T_m → T_n`, but
occasionally the literature swaps definitions for e.g. T₃ and regular.
## Main results
### T₀ spaces
* `IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton`: Given a closed set `S` in a compact T₀ space,
there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is closed.
* `exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite`: Given an open finite set `S` in a T₀ space,
there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is open.
### T₁ spaces
* `isClosedMap_const`: The constant map is a closed map.
* `discrete_of_t1_of_finite`: A finite T₁ space must have the discrete topology.
### T₂ spaces
* `t2_iff_nhds`: A space is T₂ iff the neighbourhoods of distinct points generate the bottom filter.
* `t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal`: A space is T₂ iff the `diagonal` of `X` (that is, the set of all
points of the form `(a, a) : X × X`) is closed under the product topology.
* `separatedNhds_of_finset_finset`: Any two disjoint finsets are `SeparatedNhds`.
* Most topological constructions preserve Hausdorffness;
these results are part of the typeclass inference system (e.g. `Embedding.t2Space`)
* `Set.EqOn.closure`: If two functions are equal on some set `s`, they are equal on its closure.
* `IsCompact.isClosed`: All compact sets are closed.
* `WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace.locallyCompactSpace`: If a topological space is both
weakly locally compact (i.e., each point has a compact neighbourhood)
and is T₂, then it is locally compact.
* `totallySeparatedSpace_of_t1_of_basis_clopen`: If `X` has a clopen basis, then
it is a `TotallySeparatedSpace`.
* `loc_compact_t2_tot_disc_iff_tot_sep`: A locally compact T₂ space is totally disconnected iff
it is totally separated.
* `t2Quotient`: the largest T2 quotient of a given topological space.
If the space is also compact:
* `normalOfCompactT2`: A compact T₂ space is a `NormalSpace`.
* `connectedComponent_eq_iInter_isClopen`: The connected component of a point
is the intersection of all its clopen neighbourhoods.
* `compact_t2_tot_disc_iff_tot_sep`: Being a `TotallyDisconnectedSpace`
is equivalent to being a `TotallySeparatedSpace`.
* `ConnectedComponents.t2`: `ConnectedComponents X` is T₂ for `X` T₂ and compact.
### T₃ spaces
* `disjoint_nested_nhds`: Given two points `x ≠ y`, we can find neighbourhoods `x ∈ V₁ ⊆ U₁` and
`y ∈ V₂ ⊆ U₂`, with the `Vₖ` closed and the `Uₖ` open, such that the `Uₖ` are disjoint.
## References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_axiom
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
section Separation
/--
`SeparatedNhds` is a predicate on pairs of sub`Set`s of a topological space. It holds if the two
sub`Set`s are contained in disjoint open sets.
-/
def SeparatedNhds : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun s t : Set X =>
∃ U V : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ IsOpen V ∧ s ⊆ U ∧ t ⊆ V ∧ Disjoint U V
#align separated_nhds SeparatedNhds
theorem separatedNhds_iff_disjoint {s t : Set X} : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝ˢ t) := by
simp only [(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).disjoint_iff (hasBasis_nhdsSet t), SeparatedNhds, exists_prop, ←
exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align separated_nhds_iff_disjoint separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
alias ⟨SeparatedNhds.disjoint_nhdsSet, _⟩ := separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
namespace SeparatedNhds
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set X}
@[symm]
theorem symm : SeparatedNhds s t → SeparatedNhds t s := fun ⟨U, V, oU, oV, aU, bV, UV⟩ =>
⟨V, U, oV, oU, bV, aU, Disjoint.symm UV⟩
#align separated_nhds.symm SeparatedNhds.symm
theorem comm (s t : Set X) : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ SeparatedNhds t s :=
⟨symm, symm⟩
#align separated_nhds.comm SeparatedNhds.comm
theorem preimage [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y} {s t : Set Y} (h : SeparatedNhds s t)
(hf : Continuous f) : SeparatedNhds (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
let ⟨U, V, oU, oV, sU, tV, UV⟩ := h
⟨f ⁻¹' U, f ⁻¹' V, oU.preimage hf, oV.preimage hf, preimage_mono sU, preimage_mono tV,
UV.preimage f⟩
#align separated_nhds.preimage SeparatedNhds.preimage
protected theorem disjoint (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint s t :=
let ⟨_, _, _, _, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h; hd.mono hsU htV
#align separated_nhds.disjoint SeparatedNhds.disjoint
theorem disjoint_closure_left (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint (closure s) t :=
let ⟨_U, _V, _, hV, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h
(hd.closure_left hV).mono (closure_mono hsU) htV
#align separated_nhds.disjoint_closure_left SeparatedNhds.disjoint_closure_left
theorem disjoint_closure_right (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint s (closure t) :=
h.symm.disjoint_closure_left.symm
#align separated_nhds.disjoint_closure_right SeparatedNhds.disjoint_closure_right
@[simp] theorem empty_right (s : Set X) : SeparatedNhds s ∅ :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, isOpen_empty, fun a _ => mem_univ a, Subset.rfl, disjoint_empty _⟩
#align separated_nhds.empty_right SeparatedNhds.empty_right
@[simp] theorem empty_left (s : Set X) : SeparatedNhds ∅ s :=
(empty_right _).symm
#align separated_nhds.empty_left SeparatedNhds.empty_left
theorem mono (h : SeparatedNhds s₂ t₂) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : SeparatedNhds s₁ t₁ :=
let ⟨U, V, hU, hV, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h
⟨U, V, hU, hV, hs.trans hsU, ht.trans htV, hd⟩
#align separated_nhds.mono SeparatedNhds.mono
theorem union_left : SeparatedNhds s u → SeparatedNhds t u → SeparatedNhds (s ∪ t) u := by
simpa only [separatedNhds_iff_disjoint, nhdsSet_union, disjoint_sup_left] using And.intro
#align separated_nhds.union_left SeparatedNhds.union_left
theorem union_right (ht : SeparatedNhds s t) (hu : SeparatedNhds s u) : SeparatedNhds s (t ∪ u) :=
(ht.symm.union_left hu.symm).symm
#align separated_nhds.union_right SeparatedNhds.union_right
end SeparatedNhds
/-- A T₀ space, also known as a Kolmogorov space, is a topological space such that for every pair
`x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing one but not the other. We formulate the definition in terms
of the `Inseparable` relation. -/
class T0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- Two inseparable points in a T₀ space are equal. -/
t0 : ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, Inseparable x y → x = y
#align t0_space T0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y → x = y :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align t0_space_iff_inseparable t0Space_iff_inseparable
theorem t0Space_iff_not_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ¬Inseparable x y := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_inseparable, Ne, not_imp_not, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_not_inseparable t0Space_iff_not_inseparable
theorem Inseparable.eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : Inseparable x y) : x = y :=
T0Space.t0 h
#align inseparable.eq Inseparable.eq
/-- A topology `Inducing` map from a T₀ space is injective. -/
protected theorem Inducing.injective [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Injective f := fun _ _ h =>
(hf.inseparable_iff.1 <| .of_eq h).eq
#align inducing.injective Inducing.injective
/-- A topology `Inducing` map from a T₀ space is a topological embedding. -/
protected theorem Inducing.embedding [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Embedding f :=
⟨hf, hf.injective⟩
#align inducing.embedding Inducing.embedding
lemma embedding_iff_inducing [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y} :
Embedding f ↔ Inducing f :=
⟨Embedding.toInducing, Inducing.embedding⟩
#align embedding_iff_inducing embedding_iff_inducing
theorem t0Space_iff_nhds_injective (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
t0Space_iff_inseparable X
#align t0_space_iff_nhds_injective t0Space_iff_nhds_injective
theorem nhds_injective [T0Space X] : Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
(t0Space_iff_nhds_injective X).1 ‹_›
#align nhds_injective nhds_injective
theorem inseparable_iff_eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ x = y :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align inseparable_iff_eq inseparable_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhds_eq_nhds_iff [T0Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a = 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align nhds_eq_nhds_iff nhds_eq_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem inseparable_eq_eq [T0Space X] : Inseparable = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext inseparable_iff_eq
#align inseparable_eq_eq inseparable_eq_eq
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.inseparable_iff {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
⟨fun h s hs ↦ inseparable_iff_forall_open.1 h _ (hb.isOpen hs),
fun h ↦ hb.nhds_hasBasis.eq_of_same_basis <| by
convert hb.nhds_hasBasis using 2
exact and_congr_right (h _)⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.eq_iff [T0Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : x = y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
inseparable_iff_eq.symm.trans hb.inseparable_iff
theorem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, xor_iff_not_iff, not_forall, exists_prop,
inseparable_iff_forall_open, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_exists_is_open_xor_mem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
theorem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) :=
(t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem X).1 ‹_› h
#align exists_is_open_xor_mem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
/-- Specialization forms a partial order on a t0 topological space. -/
def specializationOrder (X) [TopologicalSpace X] [T0Space X] : PartialOrder X :=
{ specializationPreorder X, PartialOrder.lift (OrderDual.toDual ∘ 𝓝) nhds_injective with }
#align specialization_order specializationOrder
instance SeparationQuotient.instT0Space : T0Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
⟨fun x y => Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y fun _ _ h =>
SeparationQuotient.mk_eq_mk.2 <| SeparationQuotient.inducing_mk.inseparable_iff.1 h⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Separation.lean | 281 | 290 | theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by |
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· refine this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s \ U = s := hmin (s \ U) diff_subset ⟨y, hy, hyU⟩ (hs.sdiff hUo)
exact (this.symm.subset hx).2 hxU
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import algebra.quandle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"28aa996fc6fb4317f0083c4e6daf79878d81be33"
/-!
# Racks and Quandles
This file defines racks and quandles, algebraic structures for sets
that bijectively act on themselves with a self-distributivity
property. If `R` is a rack and `act : R → (R ≃ R)` is the self-action,
then the self-distributivity is, equivalently, that
```
act (act x y) = act x * act y * (act x)⁻¹
```
where multiplication is composition in `R ≃ R` as a group.
Quandles are racks such that `act x x = x` for all `x`.
One example of a quandle (not yet in mathlib) is the action of a Lie
algebra on itself, defined by `act x y = Ad (exp x) y`.
Quandles and racks were independently developed by multiple
mathematicians. David Joyce introduced quandles in his thesis
[Joyce1982] to define an algebraic invariant of knot and link
complements that is analogous to the fundamental group of the
exterior, and he showed that the quandle associated to an oriented
knot is invariant up to orientation-reversed mirror image. Racks were
used by Fenn and Rourke for framed codimension-2 knots and
links in [FennRourke1992]. Unital shelves are discussed in [crans2017].
The name "rack" came from wordplay by Conway and Wraith for the "wrack
and ruin" of forgetting everything but the conjugation operation for a
group.
## Main definitions
* `Shelf` is a type with a self-distributive action
* `UnitalShelf` is a shelf with a left and right unit
* `Rack` is a shelf whose action for each element is invertible
* `Quandle` is a rack whose action for an element fixes that element
* `Quandle.conj` defines a quandle of a group acting on itself by conjugation.
* `ShelfHom` is homomorphisms of shelves, racks, and quandles.
* `Rack.EnvelGroup` gives the universal group the rack maps to as a conjugation quandle.
* `Rack.oppositeRack` gives the rack with the action replaced by its inverse.
## Main statements
* `Rack.EnvelGroup` is left adjoint to `Quandle.Conj` (`toEnvelGroup.map`).
The universality statements are `toEnvelGroup.univ` and `toEnvelGroup.univ_uniq`.
## Implementation notes
"Unital racks" are uninteresting (see `Rack.assoc_iff_id`, `UnitalShelf.assoc`), so we do not
define them.
## Notation
The following notation is localized in `quandles`:
* `x ◃ y` is `Shelf.act x y`
* `x ◃⁻¹ y` is `Rack.inv_act x y`
* `S →◃ S'` is `ShelfHom S S'`
Use `open quandles` to use these.
## Todo
* If `g` is the Lie algebra of a Lie group `G`, then `(x ◃ y) = Ad (exp x) x` forms a quandle.
* If `X` is a symmetric space, then each point has a corresponding involution that acts on `X`,
forming a quandle.
* Alexander quandle with `a ◃ b = t * b + (1 - t) * b`, with `a` and `b` elements
of a module over `Z[t,t⁻¹]`.
* If `G` is a group, `H` a subgroup, and `z` in `H`, then there is a quandle `(G/H;z)` defined by
`yH ◃ xH = yzy⁻¹xH`. Every homogeneous quandle (i.e., a quandle `Q` whose automorphism group acts
transitively on `Q` as a set) is isomorphic to such a quandle.
There is a generalization to this arbitrary quandles in [Joyce's paper (Theorem 7.2)][Joyce1982].
## Tags
rack, quandle
-/
open MulOpposite
universe u v
/-- A *Shelf* is a structure with a self-distributive binary operation.
The binary operation is regarded as a left action of the type on itself.
-/
class Shelf (α : Type u) where
/-- The action of the `Shelf` over `α`-/
act : α → α → α
/-- A verification that `act` is self-distributive-/
self_distrib : ∀ {x y z : α}, act x (act y z) = act (act x y) (act x z)
#align shelf Shelf
/--
A *unital shelf* is a shelf equipped with an element `1` such that, for all elements `x`,
we have both `x ◃ 1` and `1 ◃ x` equal `x`.
-/
class UnitalShelf (α : Type u) extends Shelf α, One α :=
(one_act : ∀ a : α, act 1 a = a)
(act_one : ∀ a : α, act a 1 = a)
#align unital_shelf UnitalShelf
/-- The type of homomorphisms between shelves.
This is also the notion of rack and quandle homomorphisms.
-/
@[ext]
structure ShelfHom (S₁ : Type*) (S₂ : Type*) [Shelf S₁] [Shelf S₂] where
/-- The function under the Shelf Homomorphism -/
toFun : S₁ → S₂
/-- The homomorphism property of a Shelf Homomorphism-/
map_act' : ∀ {x y : S₁}, toFun (Shelf.act x y) = Shelf.act (toFun x) (toFun y)
#align shelf_hom ShelfHom
#align shelf_hom.ext_iff ShelfHom.ext_iff
#align shelf_hom.ext ShelfHom.ext
/-- A *rack* is an automorphic set (a set with an action on itself by
bijections) that is self-distributive. It is a shelf such that each
element's action is invertible.
The notations `x ◃ y` and `x ◃⁻¹ y` denote the action and the
inverse action, respectively, and they are right associative.
-/
class Rack (α : Type u) extends Shelf α where
/-- The inverse actions of the elements -/
invAct : α → α → α
/-- Proof of left inverse -/
left_inv : ∀ x, Function.LeftInverse (invAct x) (act x)
/-- Proof of right inverse -/
right_inv : ∀ x, Function.RightInverse (invAct x) (act x)
#align rack Rack
/-- Action of a Shelf-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃ " => Shelf.act
/-- Inverse Action of a Rack-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃⁻¹ " => Rack.invAct
/-- Shelf Homomorphism-/
scoped[Quandles] infixr:25 " →◃ " => ShelfHom
open Quandles
namespace UnitalShelf
open Shelf
variable {S : Type*} [UnitalShelf S]
/--
A monoid is *graphic* if, for all `x` and `y`, the *graphic identity*
`(x * y) * x = x * y` holds. For a unital shelf, this graphic
identity holds.
-/
lemma act_act_self_eq (x y : S) : (x ◃ y) ◃ x = x ◃ y := by
have h : (x ◃ y) ◃ x = (x ◃ y) ◃ (x ◃ 1) := by rw [act_one]
rw [h, ← Shelf.self_distrib, act_one]
#align unital_shelf.act_act_self_eq UnitalShelf.act_act_self_eq
lemma act_idem (x : S) : (x ◃ x) = x := by rw [← act_one x, ← Shelf.self_distrib, act_one]
#align unital_shelf.act_idem UnitalShelf.act_idem
lemma act_self_act_eq (x y : S) : x ◃ (x ◃ y) = x ◃ y := by
have h : x ◃ (x ◃ y) = (x ◃ 1) ◃ (x ◃ y) := by rw [act_one]
rw [h, ← Shelf.self_distrib, one_act]
#align unital_shelf.act_self_act_eq UnitalShelf.act_self_act_eq
/--
The associativity of a unital shelf comes for free.
-/
lemma assoc (x y z : S) : (x ◃ y) ◃ z = x ◃ y ◃ z := by
rw [self_distrib, self_distrib, act_act_self_eq, act_self_act_eq]
#align unital_shelf.assoc UnitalShelf.assoc
end UnitalShelf
namespace Rack
variable {R : Type*} [Rack R]
-- Porting note: No longer a need for `Rack.self_distrib`
export Shelf (self_distrib)
-- porting note, changed name to `act'` to not conflict with `Shelf.act`
/-- A rack acts on itself by equivalences.
-/
def act' (x : R) : R ≃ R where
toFun := Shelf.act x
invFun := invAct x
left_inv := left_inv x
right_inv := right_inv x
#align rack.act Rack.act'
@[simp]
theorem act'_apply (x y : R) : act' x y = x ◃ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_apply Rack.act'_apply
@[simp]
theorem act'_symm_apply (x y : R) : (act' x).symm y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_symm_apply Rack.act'_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_apply (x y : R) : (act' x)⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.inv_act_apply Rack.invAct_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_act_eq (x y : R) : x ◃⁻¹ x ◃ y = y :=
left_inv x y
#align rack.inv_act_act_eq Rack.invAct_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem act_invAct_eq (x y : R) : x ◃ x ◃⁻¹ y = y :=
right_inv x y
#align rack.act_inv_act_eq Rack.act_invAct_eq
theorem left_cancel (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃ y = x ◃ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel Rack.left_cancel
theorem left_cancel_inv (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).symm.injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel_inv Rack.left_cancel_inv
theorem self_distrib_inv {x y z : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y ◃⁻¹ z = (x ◃⁻¹ y) ◃⁻¹ x ◃⁻¹ z := by
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃⁻¹ y), right_inv, ← left_cancel x, right_inv, self_distrib]
repeat' rw [right_inv]
#align rack.self_distrib_inv Rack.self_distrib_inv
/-- The *adjoint action* of a rack on itself is `op'`, and the adjoint
action of `x ◃ y` is the conjugate of the action of `y` by the action
of `x`. It is another way to understand the self-distributivity axiom.
This is used in the natural rack homomorphism `toConj` from `R` to
`Conj (R ≃ R)` defined by `op'`.
-/
theorem ad_conj {R : Type*} [Rack R] (x y : R) : act' (x ◃ y) = act' x * act' y * (act' x)⁻¹ := by
rw [eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]; ext z
apply self_distrib.symm
#align rack.ad_conj Rack.ad_conj
/-- The opposite rack, swapping the roles of `◃` and `◃⁻¹`.
-/
instance oppositeRack : Rack Rᵐᵒᵖ where
act x y := op (invAct (unop x) (unop y))
self_distrib := by
intro x y z
induction x using MulOpposite.rec'
induction y using MulOpposite.rec'
induction z using MulOpposite.rec'
simp only [op_inj, unop_op, op_unop]
rw [self_distrib_inv]
invAct x y := op (Shelf.act (unop x) (unop y))
left_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
right_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
#align rack.opposite_rack Rack.oppositeRack
@[simp]
theorem op_act_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃ op y = op (x ◃⁻¹ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_act_op_eq Rack.op_act_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem op_invAct_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃⁻¹ op y = op (x ◃ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_inv_act_op_eq Rack.op_invAct_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_act_act_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃ y = x ◃ y := by rw [← right_inv x y, ← self_distrib]
#align rack.self_act_act_eq Rack.self_act_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_invAct_invAct_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃⁻¹ x) ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y := by
have h := @self_act_act_eq _ _ (op x) (op y)
simpa using h
#align rack.self_inv_act_inv_act_eq Rack.self_invAct_invAct_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_act_invAct_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y := by
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃ x)]
rw [right_inv]
rw [self_act_act_eq]
rw [right_inv]
#align rack.self_act_inv_act_eq Rack.self_act_invAct_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_invAct_act_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃⁻¹ x) ◃ y = x ◃ y := by
have h := @self_act_invAct_eq _ _ (op x) (op y)
simpa using h
#align rack.self_inv_act_act_eq Rack.self_invAct_act_eq
theorem self_act_eq_iff_eq {x y : R} : x ◃ x = y ◃ y ↔ x = y := by
constructor; swap
· rintro rfl; rfl
intro h
trans (x ◃ x) ◃⁻¹ x ◃ x
· rw [← left_cancel (x ◃ x), right_inv, self_act_act_eq]
· rw [h, ← left_cancel (y ◃ y), right_inv, self_act_act_eq]
#align rack.self_act_eq_iff_eq Rack.self_act_eq_iff_eq
theorem self_invAct_eq_iff_eq {x y : R} : x ◃⁻¹ x = y ◃⁻¹ y ↔ x = y := by
have h := @self_act_eq_iff_eq _ _ (op x) (op y)
simpa using h
#align rack.self_inv_act_eq_iff_eq Rack.self_invAct_eq_iff_eq
/-- The map `x ↦ x ◃ x` is a bijection. (This has applications for the
regular isotopy version of the Reidemeister I move for knot diagrams.)
-/
def selfApplyEquiv (R : Type*) [Rack R] : R ≃ R where
toFun x := x ◃ x
invFun x := x ◃⁻¹ x
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
#align rack.self_apply_equiv Rack.selfApplyEquiv
/-- An involutory rack is one for which `Rack.oppositeRack R x` is an involution for every x.
-/
def IsInvolutory (R : Type*) [Rack R] : Prop :=
∀ x : R, Function.Involutive (Shelf.act x)
#align rack.is_involutory Rack.IsInvolutory
theorem involutory_invAct_eq_act {R : Type*} [Rack R] (h : IsInvolutory R) (x y : R) :
x ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃ y := by
rw [← left_cancel x, right_inv, h x]
#align rack.involutory_inv_act_eq_act Rack.involutory_invAct_eq_act
/-- An abelian rack is one for which the mediality axiom holds.
-/
def IsAbelian (R : Type*) [Rack R] : Prop :=
∀ x y z w : R, (x ◃ y) ◃ z ◃ w = (x ◃ z) ◃ y ◃ w
#align rack.is_abelian Rack.IsAbelian
/-- Associative racks are uninteresting.
-/
theorem assoc_iff_id {R : Type*} [Rack R] {x y z : R} : x ◃ y ◃ z = (x ◃ y) ◃ z ↔ x ◃ z = z := by
rw [self_distrib]
rw [left_cancel]
#align rack.assoc_iff_id Rack.assoc_iff_id
end Rack
namespace ShelfHom
variable {S₁ : Type*} {S₂ : Type*} {S₃ : Type*} [Shelf S₁] [Shelf S₂] [Shelf S₃]
instance : FunLike (S₁ →◃ S₂) S₁ S₂ where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : S₁ →◃ S₂) : f.toFun = f := rfl
#align shelf_hom.to_fun_eq_coe ShelfHom.toFun_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_act (f : S₁ →◃ S₂) {x y : S₁} : f (x ◃ y) = f x ◃ f y :=
map_act' f
#align shelf_hom.map_act ShelfHom.map_act
/-- The identity homomorphism -/
def id (S : Type*) [Shelf S] : S →◃ S where
toFun := fun x => x
map_act' := by simp
#align shelf_hom.id ShelfHom.id
instance inhabited (S : Type*) [Shelf S] : Inhabited (S →◃ S) :=
⟨id S⟩
#align shelf_hom.inhabited ShelfHom.inhabited
/-- The composition of shelf homomorphisms -/
def comp (g : S₂ →◃ S₃) (f : S₁ →◃ S₂) : S₁ →◃ S₃ where
toFun := g.toFun ∘ f.toFun
map_act' := by simp
#align shelf_hom.comp ShelfHom.comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (g : S₂ →◃ S₃) (f : S₁ →◃ S₂) (x : S₁) : (g.comp f) x = g (f x) :=
rfl
#align shelf_hom.comp_apply ShelfHom.comp_apply
end ShelfHom
/-- A quandle is a rack such that each automorphism fixes its corresponding element.
-/
class Quandle (α : Type*) extends Rack α where
/-- The fixing property of a Quandle -/
fix : ∀ {x : α}, act x x = x
#align quandle Quandle
namespace Quandle
open Rack
variable {Q : Type*} [Quandle Q]
attribute [simp] fix
@[simp]
theorem fix_inv {x : Q} : x ◃⁻¹ x = x := by
rw [← left_cancel x]
simp
#align quandle.fix_inv Quandle.fix_inv
instance oppositeQuandle : Quandle Qᵐᵒᵖ where
fix := by
intro x
induction' x using MulOpposite.rec'
simp
#align quandle.opposite_quandle Quandle.oppositeQuandle
/-- The conjugation quandle of a group. Each element of the group acts by
the corresponding inner automorphism.
-/
-- Porting note: no need for `nolint` and added `reducible`
abbrev Conj (G : Type*) := G
#align quandle.conj Quandle.Conj
instance Conj.quandle (G : Type*) [Group G] : Quandle (Conj G) where
act x := @MulAut.conj G _ x
self_distrib := by
intro x y z
dsimp only [MulAut.conj_apply]
simp [mul_assoc]
invAct x := (@MulAut.conj G _ x).symm
left_inv x y := by
simp [act', mul_assoc]
right_inv x y := by
simp [act', mul_assoc]
fix := by simp
#align quandle.conj.quandle Quandle.Conj.quandle
@[simp]
theorem conj_act_eq_conj {G : Type*} [Group G] (x y : Conj G) :
x ◃ y = ((x : G) * (y : G) * (x : G)⁻¹ : G) :=
rfl
#align quandle.conj_act_eq_conj Quandle.conj_act_eq_conj
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quandle.lean | 450 | 452 | theorem conj_swap {G : Type*} [Group G] (x y : Conj G) : x ◃ y = y ↔ y ◃ x = x := by |
dsimp [Conj] at *; constructor
repeat' intro h; conv_rhs => rw [eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h)]; simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
#align_import data.set.intervals.surj_on from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a59dad53320b73ef180174aae867addd707ef00e"
/-!
# Monotone surjective functions are surjective on intervals
A monotone surjective function sends any interval in the domain onto the interval with corresponding
endpoints in the range. This is expressed in this file using `Set.surjOn`, and provided for all
permutations of interval endpoints.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {f : α → β}
open Set Function
open OrderDual (toDual)
theorem surjOn_Ioo_of_monotone_surjective (h_mono : Monotone f) (h_surj : Function.Surjective f)
(a b : α) : SurjOn f (Ioo a b) (Ioo (f a) (f b)) := by
intro p hp
rcases h_surj p with ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine ⟨x, mem_Ioo.2 ?_, rfl⟩
contrapose! hp
exact fun h => h.2.not_le (h_mono <| hp <| h_mono.reflect_lt h.1)
#align surj_on_Ioo_of_monotone_surjective surjOn_Ioo_of_monotone_surjective
theorem surjOn_Ico_of_monotone_surjective (h_mono : Monotone f) (h_surj : Function.Surjective f)
(a b : α) : SurjOn f (Ico a b) (Ico (f a) (f b)) := by
obtain hab | hab := lt_or_le a b
· intro p hp
rcases eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico hp with (rfl | hp')
· exact mem_image_of_mem f (left_mem_Ico.mpr hab)
· have := surjOn_Ioo_of_monotone_surjective h_mono h_surj a b hp'
exact image_subset f Ioo_subset_Ico_self this
· rw [Ico_eq_empty (h_mono hab).not_lt]
exact surjOn_empty f _
#align surj_on_Ico_of_monotone_surjective surjOn_Ico_of_monotone_surjective
theorem surjOn_Ioc_of_monotone_surjective (h_mono : Monotone f) (h_surj : Function.Surjective f)
(a b : α) : SurjOn f (Ioc a b) (Ioc (f a) (f b)) := by
simpa using surjOn_Ico_of_monotone_surjective h_mono.dual h_surj (toDual b) (toDual a)
#align surj_on_Ioc_of_monotone_surjective surjOn_Ioc_of_monotone_surjective
-- to see that the hypothesis `a ≤ b` is necessary, consider a constant function
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/SurjOn.lean | 53 | 60 | theorem surjOn_Icc_of_monotone_surjective (h_mono : Monotone f) (h_surj : Function.Surjective f)
{a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) : SurjOn f (Icc a b) (Icc (f a) (f b)) := by |
intro p hp
rcases eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc hp with (rfl | rfl | hp')
· exact ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.mpr hab, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨b, right_mem_Icc.mpr hab, rfl⟩
· have := surjOn_Ioo_of_monotone_surjective h_mono h_surj a b hp'
exact image_subset f Ioo_subset_Icc_self this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.Besicovitch
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import measure_theory.covering.besicovitch_vector_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Satellite configurations for Besicovitch covering lemma in vector spaces
The Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, in a nice metric space, there exists a number `N`
such that, from any family of balls with bounded radii, one can extract `N` families, each made of
disjoint balls, covering together all the centers of the initial family.
A key tool in the proof of this theorem is the notion of a satellite configuration, i.e., a family
of `N + 1` balls, where the first `N` balls all intersect the last one, but none of them contains
the center of another one and their radii are controlled. This is a technical notion, but it shows
up naturally in the proof of the Besicovitch theorem (which goes through a greedy algorithm): to
ensure that in the end one needs at most `N` families of balls, the crucial property of the
underlying metric space is that there should be no satellite configuration of `N + 1` points.
This file is devoted to the study of this property in vector spaces: we prove the main result
of [Füredi and Loeb, On the best constant for the Besicovitch covering theorem][furedi-loeb1994],
which shows that the optimal such `N` in a vector space coincides with the maximal number
of points one can put inside the unit ball of radius `2` under the condition that their distances
are bounded below by `1`.
In particular, this number is bounded by `5 ^ dim` by a straightforward measure argument.
## Main definitions and results
* `multiplicity E` is the maximal number of points one can put inside the unit ball
of radius `2` in the vector space `E`, under the condition that their distances
are bounded below by `1`.
* `multiplicity_le E` shows that `multiplicity E ≤ 5 ^ (dim E)`.
* `good_τ E` is a constant `> 1`, but close enough to `1` that satellite configurations
with this parameter `τ` are not worst than for `τ = 1`.
* `isEmpty_satelliteConfig_multiplicity` is the main theorem, saying that there are
no satellite configurations of `(multiplicity E) + 1` points, for the parameter `goodτ E`.
-/
universe u
open Metric Set FiniteDimensional MeasureTheory Filter Fin
open scoped ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Besicovitch
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace SatelliteConfig
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
/-- Rescaling a satellite configuration in a vector space, to put the basepoint at `0` and the base
radius at `1`. -/
def centerAndRescale : SatelliteConfig E N τ where
c i := (a.r (last N))⁻¹ • (a.c i - a.c (last N))
r i := (a.r (last N))⁻¹ * a.r i
rpos i := by positivity
h i j hij := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, dist_sub_right, mul_left_comm τ,
Real.norm_of_nonneg]
rcases a.h hij with (⟨H₁, H₂⟩ | ⟨H₁, H₂⟩) <;> [left; right] <;> constructor <;> gcongr
hlast i hi := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, dist_sub_right, mul_left_comm τ,
Real.norm_of_nonneg]
have ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := a.hlast i hi
constructor <;> gcongr
inter i hi := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, ← mul_add, dist_sub_right, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
gcongr
exact a.inter i hi
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.center_and_rescale Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale
theorem centerAndRescale_center : a.centerAndRescale.c (last N) = 0 := by
simp [SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale]
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.center_and_rescale_center Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale_center
theorem centerAndRescale_radius {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ) :
a.centerAndRescale.r (last N) = 1 := by
simp [SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale, inv_mul_cancel (a.rpos _).ne']
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.center_and_rescale_radius Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale_radius
end SatelliteConfig
/-! ### Disjoint balls of radius close to `1` in the radius `2` ball. -/
/-- The maximum cardinality of a `1`-separated set in the ball of radius `2`. This is also the
optimal number of families in the Besicovitch covering theorem. -/
def multiplicity (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E] :=
sSup {N | ∃ s : Finset E, s.card = N ∧ (∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2) ∧ ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖}
#align besicovitch.multiplicity Besicovitch.multiplicity
section
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
/-- Any `1`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` has cardinality at most `5 ^ dim`. This is
useful to show that the supremum in the definition of `Besicovitch.multiplicity E` is
well behaved. -/
theorem card_le_of_separated (s : Finset E) (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ 5 ^ finrank ℝ E := by
/- We consider balls of radius `1/2` around the points in `s`. They are disjoint, and all
contained in the ball of radius `5/2`. A volume argument gives `s.card * (1/2)^dim ≤ (5/2)^dim`,
i.e., `s.card ≤ 5^dim`. -/
borelize E
let μ : Measure E := Measure.addHaar
let δ : ℝ := (1 : ℝ) / 2
let ρ : ℝ := (5 : ℝ) / 2
have ρpos : 0 < ρ := by norm_num
set A := ⋃ c ∈ s, ball (c : E) δ with hA
have D : Set.Pairwise (s : Set E) (Disjoint on fun c => ball (c : E) δ) := by
rintro c hc d hd hcd
apply ball_disjoint_ball
rw [dist_eq_norm]
convert h c hc d hd hcd
norm_num
have A_subset : A ⊆ ball (0 : E) ρ := by
refine iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => ?_
apply ball_subset_ball'
calc
δ + dist x 0 ≤ δ + 2 := by rw [dist_zero_right]; exact add_le_add le_rfl (hs x hx)
_ = 5 / 2 := by norm_num
have I :
(s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) ≤
ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) :=
calc
(s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) = μ A := by
rw [hA, measure_biUnion_finset D fun c _ => measurableSet_ball]
have I : 0 < δ := by norm_num
simp only [div_pow, μ.addHaar_ball_of_pos _ I]
simp only [one_div, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ μ (ball (0 : E) ρ) := measure_mono A_subset
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
simp only [μ.addHaar_ball_of_pos _ ρpos]
have J : (s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) :=
(ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right (measure_ball_pos _ _ zero_lt_one).ne' measure_ball_lt_top.ne).1 I
have K : (s.card : ℝ) ≤ (5 : ℝ) ^ finrank ℝ E := by
have := ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (pow_nonneg ρpos.le _) J
simpa [ρ, δ, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow] using this
exact mod_cast K
#align besicovitch.card_le_of_separated Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated
theorem multiplicity_le : multiplicity E ≤ 5 ^ finrank ℝ E := by
apply csSup_le
· refine ⟨0, ⟨∅, by simp⟩⟩
· rintro _ ⟨s, ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩
exact Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated s h.1 h.2
#align besicovitch.multiplicity_le Besicovitch.multiplicity_le
theorem card_le_multiplicity {s : Finset E} (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ multiplicity E := by
apply le_csSup
· refine ⟨5 ^ finrank ℝ E, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨s, ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩
exact Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated s h.1 h.2
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
exact ⟨s, rfl, hs, h's⟩
#align besicovitch.card_le_multiplicity Besicovitch.card_le_multiplicity
variable (E)
/-- If `δ` is small enough, a `(1-δ)`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` also has cardinality
at most `multiplicity E`. -/
theorem exists_goodδ :
∃ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ ∧ δ < 1 ∧ ∀ s : Finset E, (∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2) →
(∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 - δ ≤ ‖c - d‖) → s.card ≤ multiplicity E := by
classical
/- This follows from a compactness argument: otherwise, one could extract a converging
subsequence, to obtain a `1`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` with cardinality
`N = multiplicity E + 1`. To formalize this, we work with functions `Fin N → E`.
-/
by_contra! h
set N := multiplicity E + 1 with hN
have :
∀ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ → ∃ f : Fin N → E, (∀ i : Fin N, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2) ∧
Pairwise fun i j => 1 - δ ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := by
intro δ hδ
rcases lt_or_le δ 1 with (hδ' | hδ')
· rcases h δ hδ hδ' with ⟨s, hs, h's, s_card⟩
obtain ⟨f, f_inj, hfs⟩ : ∃ f : Fin N → E, Function.Injective f ∧ range f ⊆ ↑s := by
have : Fintype.card (Fin N) ≤ s.card := by simp only [Fintype.card_fin]; exact s_card
rcases Function.Embedding.exists_of_card_le_finset this with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨f, f.injective, hf⟩
simp only [range_subset_iff, Finset.mem_coe] at hfs
exact ⟨f, fun i => hs _ (hfs i), fun i j hij => h's _ (hfs i) _ (hfs j) (f_inj.ne hij)⟩
· exact
⟨fun _ => 0, by simp, fun i j _ => by
simpa only [norm_zero, sub_nonpos, sub_self]⟩
-- For `δ > 0`, `F δ` is a function from `fin N` to the ball of radius `2` for which two points
-- in the image are separated by `1 - δ`.
choose! F hF using this
-- Choose a converging subsequence when `δ → 0`.
have : ∃ f : Fin N → E, (∀ i : Fin N, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2) ∧ Pairwise fun i j => 1 ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := by
obtain ⟨u, _, zero_lt_u, hu⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ,
(∀ m n : ℕ, m < n → u n < u m) ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Filter.Tendsto u Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have A : ∀ n, F (u n) ∈ closedBall (0 : Fin N → E) 2 := by
intro n
simp only [pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg zero_le_two, mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right,
(hF (u n) (zero_lt_u n)).left, forall_const]
obtain ⟨f, fmem, φ, φ_mono, hf⟩ :
∃ f ∈ closedBall (0 : Fin N → E) 2,
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ Tendsto ((F ∘ u) ∘ φ) atTop (𝓝 f) :=
IsCompact.tendsto_subseq (isCompact_closedBall _ _) A
refine ⟨f, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
· simp only [pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg zero_le_two, mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right] at fmem
exact fmem i
· have A : Tendsto (fun n => ‖F (u (φ n)) i - F (u (φ n)) j‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖f i - f j‖) :=
((hf.apply_nhds i).sub (hf.apply_nhds j)).norm
have B : Tendsto (fun n => 1 - u (φ n)) atTop (𝓝 (1 - 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.sub (hu.comp φ_mono.tendsto_atTop)
rw [sub_zero] at B
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' B A fun n => (hF (u (φ n)) (zero_lt_u _)).2 hij
rcases this with ⟨f, hf, h'f⟩
-- the range of `f` contradicts the definition of `multiplicity E`.
have finj : Function.Injective f := by
intro i j hij
by_contra h
have : 1 ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := h'f h
simp only [hij, norm_zero, sub_self] at this
exact lt_irrefl _ (this.trans_lt zero_lt_one)
let s := Finset.image f Finset.univ
have s_card : s.card = N := by rw [Finset.card_image_of_injective _ finj]; exact Finset.card_fin N
have hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2 := by
simp only [s, hf, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_const, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ,
Finset.mem_image, true_and]
have h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖ := by
simp only [s, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.mem_image,
Ne, exists_true_left, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_true_left, true_and]
intro i j hij
have : i ≠ j := fun h => by rw [h] at hij; exact hij rfl
exact h'f this
have : s.card ≤ multiplicity E := card_le_multiplicity hs h's
rw [s_card, hN] at this
exact lt_irrefl _ ((Nat.lt_succ_self (multiplicity E)).trans_le this)
#align besicovitch.exists_good_δ Besicovitch.exists_goodδ
/-- A small positive number such that any `1 - δ`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` has
cardinality at most `Besicovitch.multiplicity E`. -/
def goodδ : ℝ :=
(exists_goodδ E).choose
#align besicovitch.good_δ Besicovitch.goodδ
theorem goodδ_lt_one : goodδ E < 1 :=
(exists_goodδ E).choose_spec.2.1
#align besicovitch.good_δ_lt_one Besicovitch.goodδ_lt_one
/-- A number `τ > 1`, but chosen close enough to `1` so that the construction in the Besicovitch
covering theorem using this parameter `τ` will give the smallest possible number of covering
families. -/
def goodτ : ℝ :=
1 + goodδ E / 4
#align besicovitch.good_τ Besicovitch.goodτ
theorem one_lt_goodτ : 1 < goodτ E := by
dsimp [goodτ, goodδ]; linarith [(exists_goodδ E).choose_spec.1]
#align besicovitch.one_lt_good_τ Besicovitch.one_lt_goodτ
variable {E}
theorem card_le_multiplicity_of_δ {s : Finset E} (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 - goodδ E ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ multiplicity E :=
(Classical.choose_spec (exists_goodδ E)).2.2 s hs h's
#align besicovitch.card_le_multiplicity_of_δ Besicovitch.card_le_multiplicity_of_δ
theorem le_multiplicity_of_δ_of_fin {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → E) (h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2)
(h' : Pairwise fun i j => 1 - goodδ E ≤ ‖f i - f j‖) : n ≤ multiplicity E := by
classical
have finj : Function.Injective f := by
intro i j hij
by_contra h
have : 1 - goodδ E ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := h' h
simp only [hij, norm_zero, sub_self] at this
linarith [goodδ_lt_one E]
let s := Finset.image f Finset.univ
have s_card : s.card = n := by rw [Finset.card_image_of_injective _ finj]; exact Finset.card_fin n
have hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2 := by
simp only [s, h, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_const, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ,
Finset.mem_image, imp_true_iff, true_and]
have h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 - goodδ E ≤ ‖c - d‖ := by
simp only [s, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.mem_image,
Ne, exists_true_left, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_true_left, true_and]
intro i j hij
have : i ≠ j := fun h => by rw [h] at hij; exact hij rfl
exact h' this
have : s.card ≤ multiplicity E := card_le_multiplicity_of_δ hs h's
rwa [s_card] at this
#align besicovitch.le_multiplicity_of_δ_of_fin Besicovitch.le_multiplicity_of_δ_of_fin
end
namespace SatelliteConfig
/-!
### Relating satellite configurations to separated points in the ball of radius `2`.
We prove that the number of points in a satellite configuration is bounded by the maximal number
of `1`-separated points in the ball of radius `2`. For this, start from a satellite configuration
`c`. Without loss of generality, one can assume that the last ball is centered at `0` and of
radius `1`. Define `c' i = c i` if `‖c i‖ ≤ 2`, and `c' i = (2/‖c i‖) • c i` if `‖c i‖ > 2`.
It turns out that these points are `1 - δ`-separated, where `δ` is arbitrarily small if `τ` is
close enough to `1`. The number of such configurations is bounded by `multiplicity E` if `δ` is
suitably small.
To check that the points `c' i` are `1 - δ`-separated, one treats separately the cases where
both `‖c i‖` and `‖c j‖` are `≤ 2`, where one of them is `≤ 2` and the other one is `> 2`, and
where both of them are `> 2`.
-/
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
(lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
(i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
have ah :
Pairwise fun i j => a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
calc
(1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := by gcongr
_ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
_ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ by linarith only [J, K, L]
have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
intro k
rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
exact a.hlast' k hτ
rcases ah inej with (H | H)
· apply le_trans _ H.1
exact hτ' i
· rw [norm_sub_rev]
apply le_trans _ H.1
exact hτ' j
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.exists_normalized_aux1 Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.exists_normalized_aux1
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
#adaptation_note /-- after v4.7.0-rc1, there is a performance problem in `field_simp`.
(Part of the code was ignoring the `maxDischargeDepth` setting:
now that we have to increase it, other paths becomes slow.) -/
set_option maxHeartbeats 400000 in
theorem exists_normalized_aux2 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
(lastc : a.c (last N) = 0) (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4)
(hδ2 : δ ≤ 1) (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) (hi : ‖a.c i‖ ≤ 2) (hj : 2 < ‖a.c j‖) :
1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - (2 / ‖a.c j‖) • a.c j‖ := by
have ah :
Pairwise fun i j => a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
have hcrj : ‖a.c j‖ ≤ a.r j + 1 := by simpa only [lastc, lastr, dist_zero_right] using a.inter' j
have I : a.r i ≤ 2 := by
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with (H | H)
· apply (a.hlast i H).1.trans
simpa only [dist_eq_norm, lastc, sub_zero] using hi
· have : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H
rw [this, lastr]
exact one_le_two
have J : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
calc
(1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := by gcongr
_ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
_ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
have A : a.r j - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
rcases ah inej.symm with (H | H); · rw [norm_sub_rev]; linarith [H.1]
have C : a.r j ≤ 4 :=
calc
a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i := H.2
_ ≤ τ * 2 := by gcongr
_ ≤ 5 / 4 * 2 := by gcongr; linarith only [hδ1, hδ2]
_ ≤ 4 := by norm_num
calc
a.r j - δ ≤ a.r j - a.r j / 4 * δ := by
gcongr _ - ?_
exact mul_le_of_le_one_left δnonneg (by linarith only [C])
_ = (1 - δ / 4) * a.r j := by ring
_ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (τ * a.r i) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left H.2 D
_ ≤ 1 * a.r i := by rw [← mul_assoc]; gcongr
_ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by rw [one_mul]; exact H.1
set d := (2 / ‖a.c j‖) • a.c j with hd
have : a.r j - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - d‖ + (a.r j - 1) :=
calc
a.r j - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := A
_ ≤ ‖a.c i - d‖ + ‖d - a.c j‖ := by simp only [← dist_eq_norm, dist_triangle]
_ ≤ ‖a.c i - d‖ + (a.r j - 1) := by
apply add_le_add_left
have A : 0 ≤ 1 - 2 / ‖a.c j‖ := by simpa [div_le_iff (zero_le_two.trans_lt hj)] using hj.le
rw [← one_smul ℝ (a.c j), hd, ← sub_smul, norm_smul, norm_sub_rev, Real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg A, sub_mul]
field_simp [(zero_le_two.trans_lt hj).ne']
linarith only [hcrj]
linarith only [this]
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.exists_normalized_aux2 Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.exists_normalized_aux2
theorem exists_normalized_aux3 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
(lastc : a.c (last N) = 0) (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4)
(i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) (hi : 2 < ‖a.c i‖) (hij : ‖a.c i‖ ≤ ‖a.c j‖) :
1 - δ ≤ ‖(2 / ‖a.c i‖) • a.c i - (2 / ‖a.c j‖) • a.c j‖ := by
have ah :
Pairwise fun i j => a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
have hcrj : ‖a.c j‖ ≤ a.r j + 1 := by simpa only [lastc, lastr, dist_zero_right] using a.inter' j
have A : a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i‖ := by
have : i < last N := by
apply lt_top_iff_ne_top.2
intro iN
change i = last N at iN
rw [iN, lastc, norm_zero] at hi
exact lt_irrefl _ (zero_le_two.trans_lt hi)
convert (a.hlast i this).1 using 1
rw [dist_eq_norm, lastc, sub_zero]
have hj : 2 < ‖a.c j‖ := hi.trans_le hij
set s := ‖a.c i‖
have spos : 0 < s := zero_lt_two.trans hi
set d := (s / ‖a.c j‖) • a.c j with hd
have I : ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ≤ ‖a.c j‖ - s + ‖d - a.c i‖ :=
calc
‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ≤ ‖a.c j - d‖ + ‖d - a.c i‖ := by simp [← dist_eq_norm, dist_triangle]
_ = ‖a.c j‖ - ‖a.c i‖ + ‖d - a.c i‖ := by
nth_rw 1 [← one_smul ℝ (a.c j)]
rw [add_left_inj, hd, ← sub_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg, sub_mul,
one_mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (zero_le_two.trans_lt hj).ne']
rwa [sub_nonneg, div_le_iff (zero_lt_two.trans hj), one_mul]
have J : a.r j - ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ≤ s / 2 * δ :=
calc
a.r j - ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ≤ s * (τ - 1) := by
rcases ah inej.symm with (H | H)
· calc
a.r j - ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ≤ 0 := sub_nonpos.2 H.1
_ ≤ s * (τ - 1) := mul_nonneg spos.le (sub_nonneg.2 hτ)
· rw [norm_sub_rev] at H
calc
a.r j - ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ≤ τ * a.r i - a.r i := sub_le_sub H.2 H.1
_ = a.r i * (τ - 1) := by ring
_ ≤ s * (τ - 1) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right A (sub_nonneg.2 hτ)
_ ≤ s * (δ / 2) := (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (by linarith only [δnonneg, hδ1]) spos.le)
_ = s / 2 * δ := by ring
have invs_nonneg : 0 ≤ 2 / s := div_nonneg zero_le_two (zero_le_two.trans hi.le)
calc
1 - δ = 2 / s * (s / 2 - s / 2 * δ) := by field_simp [spos.ne']; ring
_ ≤ 2 / s * ‖d - a.c i‖ :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (by linarith only [hcrj, I, J, hi]) invs_nonneg)
_ = ‖(2 / s) • a.c i - (2 / ‖a.c j‖) • a.c j‖ := by
conv_lhs => rw [norm_sub_rev, ← abs_of_nonneg invs_nonneg]
rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← norm_smul, smul_sub, hd, smul_smul]
congr 3
field_simp [spos.ne']
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.exists_normalized_aux3 Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.exists_normalized_aux3
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/BesicovitchVectorSpace.lean | 469 | 495 | theorem exists_normalized {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ) (lastc : a.c (last N) = 0)
(lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1) :
∃ c' : Fin N.succ → E, (∀ n, ‖c' n‖ ≤ 2) ∧ Pairwise fun i j => 1 - δ ≤ ‖c' i - c' j‖ := by |
let c' : Fin N.succ → E := fun i => if ‖a.c i‖ ≤ 2 then a.c i else (2 / ‖a.c i‖) • a.c i
have norm_c'_le : ∀ i, ‖c' i‖ ≤ 2 := by
intro i
simp only [c']
split_ifs with h; · exact h
by_cases hi : ‖a.c i‖ = 0 <;> field_simp [norm_smul, hi]
refine ⟨c', fun n => norm_c'_le n, fun i j inej => ?_⟩
-- up to exchanging `i` and `j`, one can assume `‖c i‖ ≤ ‖c j‖`.
wlog hij : ‖a.c i‖ ≤ ‖a.c j‖ generalizing i j
· rw [norm_sub_rev]; exact this j i inej.symm (le_of_not_le hij)
rcases le_or_lt ‖a.c j‖ 2 with (Hj | Hj)
-- case `‖c j‖ ≤ 2` (and therefore also `‖c i‖ ≤ 2`)
· simp_rw [c', Hj, hij.trans Hj, if_true]
exact exists_normalized_aux1 a lastr hτ δ hδ1 hδ2 i j inej
-- case `2 < ‖c j‖`
· have H'j : ‖a.c j‖ ≤ 2 ↔ False := by simpa only [not_le, iff_false_iff] using Hj
rcases le_or_lt ‖a.c i‖ 2 with (Hi | Hi)
· -- case `‖c i‖ ≤ 2`
simp_rw [c', Hi, if_true, H'j, if_false]
exact exists_normalized_aux2 a lastc lastr hτ δ hδ1 hδ2 i j inej Hi Hj
· -- case `2 < ‖c i‖`
have H'i : ‖a.c i‖ ≤ 2 ↔ False := by simpa only [not_le, iff_false_iff] using Hi
simp_rw [c', H'i, if_false, H'j, if_false]
exact exists_normalized_aux3 a lastc lastr hτ δ hδ1 i j inej Hi hij
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Chebyshev
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.regularity.bound from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf7ef0e83e5b7e6c1169e97f055e58a2e4e9d52d"
/-!
# Numerical bounds for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
This file gathers the numerical facts required by the proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.stepBound`: During the inductive step, a partition of size `n` is blown to
size at most `stepBound n`.
* `SzemerediRegularity.initialBound`: The size of the partition we start the induction with.
* `SzemerediRegularity.bound`: The upper bound on the size of the partition produced by our version
of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset Fintype Function Real
namespace SzemerediRegularity
/-- Auxiliary function for Szemerédi's regularity lemma. Blowing up a partition of size `n` during
the induction results in a partition of size at most `stepBound n`. -/
def stepBound (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
n * 4 ^ n
#align szemeredi_regularity.step_bound SzemerediRegularity.stepBound
theorem le_stepBound : id ≤ stepBound := fun n =>
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| pow_pos (by norm_num) n
#align szemeredi_regularity.le_step_bound SzemerediRegularity.le_stepBound
theorem stepBound_mono : Monotone stepBound := fun a b h =>
Nat.mul_le_mul h <| Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by norm_num) h
#align szemeredi_regularity.step_bound_mono SzemerediRegularity.stepBound_mono
theorem stepBound_pos_iff {n : ℕ} : 0 < stepBound n ↔ 0 < n :=
mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right <| by positivity
#align szemeredi_regularity.step_bound_pos_iff SzemerediRegularity.stepBound_pos_iff
alias ⟨_, stepBound_pos⟩ := stepBound_pos_iff
#align szemeredi_regularity.step_bound_pos SzemerediRegularity.stepBound_pos
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_stepBound {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (n : ℕ) :
(stepBound n : α) = n * 4 ^ n := by unfold stepBound; norm_cast
end SzemerediRegularity
open SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)}
{u : Finset α} {ε : ℝ}
local notation3 "m" => (card α / stepBound P.parts.card : ℕ)
local notation3 "a" => (card α / P.parts.card - m * 4 ^ P.parts.card : ℕ)
namespace SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
private theorem eps_pos {ε : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ n * ε ^ 5) : 0 < ε :=
(Odd.pow_pos_iff (by decide)).mp
(pos_of_mul_pos_right ((show 0 < (100 : ℝ) by norm_num).trans_le h) (by positivity))
private theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : P.parts.card * 16 ^ P.parts.card ≤ card α) : 0 < m :=
Nat.div_pos ((Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| Nat.pow_le_pow_left (by norm_num) _).trans hPα) <|
stepBound_pos (P.parts_nonempty <| univ_nonempty.ne_empty).card_pos
/-- Local extension for the `positivity` tactic: A few facts that are needed many times for the
proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. -/
-- Porting note: positivity extensions must now be global, and this did not seem like a good
-- match for positivity anymore, so I wrote a new tactic (kmill)
scoped macro "sz_positivity" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ try have := m_pos ‹_›
try have := eps_pos ‹_›
positivity })
-- Original meta code
/- meta def positivity_szemeredi_regularity : expr → tactic strictness
| `(%%n / step_bound (finpartition.parts %%P).card) := do
p ← to_expr
``((finpartition.parts %%P).card * 16^(finpartition.parts %%P).card ≤ %%n)
>>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``m_pos [p]
| ε := do
typ ← infer_type ε,
unify typ `(ℝ),
p ← to_expr ``(100 ≤ 4 ^ _ * %%ε ^ 5) >>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``eps_pos [p] -/
end SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
namespace SzemerediRegularity
open scoped SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : P.parts.card * 16 ^ P.parts.card ≤ card α) : 0 < m := by
sz_positivity
#align szemeredi_regularity.m_pos SzemerediRegularity.m_pos
theorem coe_m_add_one_pos : 0 < (m : ℝ) + 1 := by positivity
#align szemeredi_regularity.coe_m_add_one_pos SzemerediRegularity.coe_m_add_one_pos
theorem one_le_m_coe [Nonempty α] (hPα : P.parts.card * 16 ^ P.parts.card ≤ card α) : (1 : ℝ) ≤ m :=
Nat.one_le_cast.2 <| m_pos hPα
#align szemeredi_regularity.one_le_m_coe SzemerediRegularity.one_le_m_coe
theorem eps_pow_five_pos (hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ P.parts.card * ε ^ 5) : ↑0 < ε ^ 5 :=
pos_of_mul_pos_right ((by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 100).trans_le hPε) <| pow_nonneg (by norm_num) _
#align szemeredi_regularity.eps_pow_five_pos SzemerediRegularity.eps_pow_five_pos
theorem eps_pos (hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ P.parts.card * ε ^ 5) : 0 < ε :=
(Odd.pow_pos_iff (by decide)).mp (eps_pow_five_pos hPε)
#align szemeredi_regularity.eps_pos SzemerediRegularity.eps_pos
theorem hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m [Nonempty α] (hPα : P.parts.card * 16 ^ P.parts.card ≤ card α)
(hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ P.parts.card * ε ^ 5) : 100 / ε ^ 5 ≤ m :=
(div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (eps_pow_five_pos hPε).le (by positivity) hPε).trans <| by
norm_cast
rwa [Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le' (stepBound_pos (P.parts_nonempty <|
univ_nonempty.ne_empty).card_pos), stepBound, mul_left_comm, ← mul_pow]
#align szemeredi_regularity.hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m SzemerediRegularity.hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m
theorem hundred_le_m [Nonempty α] (hPα : P.parts.card * 16 ^ P.parts.card ≤ card α)
(hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ P.parts.card * ε ^ 5) (hε : ε ≤ 1) : 100 ≤ m :=
mod_cast
(hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m hPα hPε).trans'
(le_div_self (by norm_num) (by sz_positivity) <| pow_le_one _ (by sz_positivity) hε)
#align szemeredi_regularity.hundred_le_m SzemerediRegularity.hundred_le_m
theorem a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card : a + 1 ≤ 4 ^ P.parts.card := by
have h : 1 ≤ 4 ^ P.parts.card := one_le_pow_of_one_le (by norm_num) _
rw [stepBound, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul]
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
rw [add_le_add_iff_right, tsub_le_iff_left, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Nat.lt_div_mul_add h)
#align szemeredi_regularity.a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card SzemerediRegularity.a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card
theorem card_aux₁ (hucard : u.card = m * 4 ^ P.parts.card + a) :
(4 ^ P.parts.card - a) * m + a * (m + 1) = u.card := by
rw [hucard, mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc, ← add_mul,
Nat.sub_add_cancel ((Nat.le_succ _).trans a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card), mul_comm]
#align szemeredi_regularity.card_aux₁ SzemerediRegularity.card_aux₁
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Bound.lean | 159 | 168 | theorem card_aux₂ (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (hu : u ∈ P.parts)
(hucard : ¬u.card = m * 4 ^ P.parts.card + a) :
(4 ^ P.parts.card - (a + 1)) * m + (a + 1) * (m + 1) = u.card := by |
have : m * 4 ^ P.parts.card ≤ card α / P.parts.card := by
rw [stepBound, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul]
exact Nat.div_mul_le_self _ _
rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le this] at hucard
rw [(hP.card_parts_eq_average hu).resolve_left hucard, mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc, ← add_mul,
Nat.sub_add_cancel a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card, ← add_assoc, mul_comm,
Nat.add_sub_of_le this, card_univ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
#align_import data.polynomial.derivative from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
/-!
# The derivative map on polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.derivative`: The formal derivative of polynomials, expressed as a linear map.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Derivative
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `derivative p` is the formal derivative of the polynomial `p` -/
def derivative : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1)
map_add' p q := by
dsimp only
rw [sum_add_index] <;>
simp only [add_mul, forall_const, RingHom.map_add, eq_self_iff_true, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero]
map_smul' a p := by
dsimp; rw [sum_smul_index] <;>
simp only [mul_sum, ← C_mul', mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, RingHom.map_mul, forall_const, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero, sum]
#align polynomial.derivative Polynomial.derivative
theorem derivative_apply (p : R[X]) : derivative p = p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.derivative_apply Polynomial.derivative_apply
theorem coeff_derivative (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (derivative p) n = coeff p (n + 1) * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivative_apply]
simp only [coeff_X_pow, coeff_sum, coeff_C_mul]
rw [sum, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + 1)]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, mul_one, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]; norm_cast
· intro b
cases b
· intros
rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul]
· intro _ H
rw [Nat.add_one_sub_one, if_neg (mt (congr_arg Nat.succ) H.symm), mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (add_tsub_cancel_right n 1).symm, mul_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mem_support_iff]
intro h
push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align polynomial.coeff_derivative Polynomial.coeff_derivative
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_zero : derivative (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative.map_zero
#align polynomial.derivative_zero Polynomial.derivative_zero
theorem iterate_derivative_zero {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_map_zero derivative k
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero Polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial n a) = monomial (n - 1) (a * n) := by
rw [derivative_apply, sum_monomial_index, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
simp
#align polynomial.derivative_monomial Polynomial.derivative_monomial
theorem derivative_C_mul_X (a : R) : derivative (C a * X) = C a := by
simp [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial, Nat.cast_one, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (C a * X ^ n) = C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_sq (a : R) : derivative (C a * X ^ 2) = C (a * 2) * X := by
rw [derivative_C_mul_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X_pow (n : ℕ) : derivative (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (n : R) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
convert derivative_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_X_pow
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_sq : derivative (X ^ 2 : R[X]) = C 2 * X := by
rw [derivative_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem derivative_C {a : R} : derivative (C a) = 0 := by simp [derivative_apply]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C Polynomial.derivative_C
theorem derivative_of_natDegree_zero {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree = 0) : derivative p = 0 := by
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hp, derivative_C]
#align polynomial.derivative_of_nat_degree_zero Polynomial.derivative_of_natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X : derivative (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
(derivative_monomial _ _).trans <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X Polynomial.derivative_X
@[simp]
theorem derivative_one : derivative (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_C
#align polynomial.derivative_one Polynomial.derivative_one
#noalign polynomial.derivative_bit0
#noalign polynomial.derivative_bit1
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_add {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f + g) = derivative f + derivative g :=
derivative.map_add f g
#align polynomial.derivative_add Polynomial.derivative_add
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_add_C (c : R) : derivative (X + C c) = 1 := by
rw [derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_add_C Polynomial.derivative_X_add_C
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_sum {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R[X]} :
derivative (∑ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ b ∈ s, derivative (f b) :=
map_sum ..
#align polynomial.derivative_sum Polynomial.derivative_sum
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S)
(p : R[X]) : derivative (s • p) = s • derivative p :=
derivative.map_smul_of_tower s p
#align polynomial.derivative_smul Polynomial.derivative_smul
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R]
(s : S) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) : derivative^[k] (s • p) = s • derivative^[k] p := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp [ih]
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_smul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_smul
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C_mul (a : R) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (C a * p) = C a * derivative^[k] p := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_C_mul, iterate_derivative_smul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_C_mul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_C_mul
theorem of_mem_support_derivative {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ p.derivative.support) :
n + 1 ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.2 fun h1 : p.coeff (n + 1) = 0 =>
mem_support_iff.1 h <| show p.derivative.coeff n = 0 by rw [coeff_derivative, h1, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.of_mem_support_derivative Polynomial.of_mem_support_derivative
theorem degree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.derivative.degree < p.degree :=
(Finset.sup_lt_iff <| bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 <| mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp).2 fun n hp =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 n.lt_succ_self) <|
Finset.le_sup <| of_mem_support_derivative hp
#align polynomial.degree_derivative_lt Polynomial.degree_derivative_lt
theorem degree_derivative_le {p : R[X]} : p.derivative.degree ≤ p.degree :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p = 0 then le_of_eq <| by rw [H, derivative_zero] else (degree_derivative_lt H).le
#align polynomial.degree_derivative_le Polynomial.degree_derivative_le
theorem natDegree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
p.derivative.natDegree < p.natDegree := by
rcases eq_or_ne (derivative p) 0 with hp' | hp'
· rw [hp', Polynomial.natDegree_zero]
exact hp.bot_lt
· rw [natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff hp']
exact degree_derivative_lt fun h => hp (h.symm ▸ natDegree_zero)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_derivative_lt Polynomial.natDegree_derivative_lt
theorem natDegree_derivative_le (p : R[X]) : p.derivative.natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - 1 := by
by_cases p0 : p.natDegree = 0
· simp [p0, derivative_of_natDegree_zero]
· exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (natDegree_derivative_lt p0)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_derivative_le Polynomial.natDegree_derivative_le
theorem natDegree_iterate_derivative (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
(derivative^[k] p).natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [Function.iterate_zero_apply, Nat.sub_zero]
| succ d hd =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', Nat.sub_succ']
exact (natDegree_derivative_le _).trans <| Nat.sub_le_sub_right hd 1
@[simp]
theorem derivative_natCast {n : ℕ} : derivative (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← map_natCast C n]
exact derivative_C
#align polynomial.derivative_nat_cast Polynomial.derivative_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias derivative_nat_cast := derivative_natCast
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem derivative_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
derivative (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_natCast
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {x : ℕ} (hx : p.natDegree < x) :
Polynomial.derivative^[x] p = 0 := by
induction' h : p.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with _ ih generalizing p x
subst h
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_of_gt hx).ne'
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply]
by_cases hp : p.natDegree = 0
· rw [derivative_of_natDegree_zero hp, iterate_derivative_zero]
have := natDegree_derivative_lt hp
exact ih _ this (this.trans_le <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ hx) rfl
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_eq_zero Polynomial.iterate_derivative_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (C a : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| (natDegree_C _).trans_lt h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_C Polynomial.iterate_derivative_C
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_one {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_C h
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_one Polynomial.iterate_derivative_one
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_X {k} (h : 1 < k) : derivative^[k] (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| natDegree_X_le.trans_lt h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_X Polynomial.iterate_derivative_X
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]}
(h : derivative f = 0) : f.natDegree = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with (rfl | hf)
· exact natDegree_zero
rw [natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
by_contra! f_nat_degree_pos
rw [← natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos] at f_nat_degree_pos
let m := f.natDegree - 1
have hm : m + 1 = f.natDegree := tsub_add_cancel_of_le f_nat_degree_pos
have h2 := coeff_derivative f m
rw [Polynomial.ext_iff] at h
rw [h m, coeff_zero, ← Nat.cast_add_one, ← nsmul_eq_mul', eq_comm, smul_eq_zero] at h2
replace h2 := h2.resolve_left m.succ_ne_zero
rw [hm, ← leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at h2
exact hf h2
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero
theorem eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]} (h : derivative f = 0) :
f = C (f.coeff 0) :=
eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero <| natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_mul {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f * g) = derivative f * g + f * derivative g := by
induction f using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add => simp only [add_mul, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| h_monomial m a =>
induction g using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add => simp only [mul_add, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp only [monomial_mul_monomial, derivative_monomial]
simp only [mul_assoc, (Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, map_add]
cases m with
| zero => simp only [zero_add, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => simp only [add_zero, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [add_assoc, add_comm n 1]
#align polynomial.derivative_mul Polynomial.derivative_mul
theorem derivative_eval (p : R[X]) (x : R) :
p.derivative.eval x = p.sum fun n a => a * n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
simp_rw [derivative_apply, eval_sum, eval_mul_X_pow, eval_C]
#align polynomial.derivative_eval Polynomial.derivative_eval
@[simp]
theorem derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
derivative (p.map f) = p.derivative.map f := by
let n := max p.natDegree (map f p).natDegree
rw [derivative_apply, derivative_apply]
rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
on_goal 1 => rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
· simp only [Polynomial.map_sum, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_C, map_mul, coeff_map,
map_natCast, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X]
all_goals intro n; rw [zero_mul, C_0, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.derivative_map Polynomial.derivative_map
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) (k : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative^[k] (p.map f) = (Polynomial.derivative^[k] p).map f := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp only [ih, Function.iterate_succ, Polynomial.derivative_map, Function.comp_apply]
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_map Polynomial.iterate_derivative_map
theorem derivative_natCast_mul {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} :
derivative ((n : R[X]) * f) = n * derivative f := by
simp
#align polynomial.derivative_nat_cast_mul Polynomial.derivative_natCast_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias derivative_nat_cast_mul := derivative_natCast_mul
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_natCast_mul {n k : ℕ} {f : R[X]} :
derivative^[k] ((n : R[X]) * f) = n * derivative^[k] f := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing f <;> simp [*]
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_nat_cast_mul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_natCast_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias iterate_derivative_nat_cast_mul := iterate_derivative_natCast_mul
theorem mem_support_derivative [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
n ∈ (derivative p).support ↔ n + 1 ∈ p.support := by
suffices ¬p.coeff (n + 1) * (n + 1 : ℕ) = 0 ↔ coeff p (n + 1) ≠ 0 by
simpa only [mem_support_iff, coeff_derivative, Ne, Nat.cast_succ]
rw [← nsmul_eq_mul', smul_eq_zero]
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or_iff]
#align polynomial.mem_support_derivative Polynomial.mem_support_derivative
@[simp]
theorem degree_derivative_eq [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] (p : R[X]) (hp : 0 < natDegree p) :
degree (derivative p) = (natDegree p - 1 : ℕ) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [derivative_apply]
apply le_trans (degree_sum_le _ _) (Finset.sup_le _)
intro n hn
apply le_trans (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _) (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (tsub_le_tsub_right _ _))
apply le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hn
· refine le_sup ?_
rw [mem_support_derivative, tsub_add_cancel_of_le, mem_support_iff]
· rw [coeff_natDegree, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
intro h
rw [h, natDegree_zero] at hp
exact hp.false
exact hp
#align polynomial.degree_derivative_eq Polynomial.degree_derivative_eq
#noalign polynomial.coeff_iterate_derivative_as_prod_Ico
#noalign polynomial.coeff_iterate_derivative_as_prod_range
theorem coeff_iterate_derivative {k} (p : R[X]) (m : ℕ) :
(derivative^[k] p).coeff m = (m + k).descFactorial k • p.coeff (m + k) := by
induction k generalizing m with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
calc
(derivative^[k + 1] p).coeff m
_ = Nat.descFactorial (Nat.succ (m + k)) k • p.coeff (m + k.succ) * (m + 1) := by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', coeff_derivative, ih m.succ, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_succ]
_ = ((m + 1) * Nat.descFactorial (Nat.succ (m + k)) k) • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, ← nsmul_eq_mul', smul_smul]
_ = Nat.descFactorial (m.succ + k) k.succ • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [← Nat.succ_add, Nat.descFactorial_succ, add_tsub_cancel_right]
_ = Nat.descFactorial (m + k.succ) k.succ • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ]
theorem iterate_derivative_mul {n} (p q : R[X]) :
derivative^[n] (p * q) =
∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k] q)) := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [Finset.range]
calc
derivative^[n + 1] (p * q) =
derivative (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k] q)) := by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', IH]
_ = (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k + 1] p * derivative^[k] q)) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q) := by
simp_rw [derivative_sum, derivative_smul, derivative_mul, Function.iterate_succ_apply',
smul_add, sum_add_distrib]
_ = (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k.succ • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ, n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q) :=
?_
_ = ((∑ k ∈ range n.succ, n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k.succ • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) := by
rw [add_comm, add_assoc]
_ = (∑ i ∈ range n.succ,
(n + 1).choose (i + 1) • (derivative^[n + 1 - (i + 1)] p * derivative^[i + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) := by
simp_rw [Nat.choose_succ_succ, Nat.succ_sub_succ, add_smul, sum_add_distrib]
_ = ∑ k ∈ range n.succ.succ,
n.succ.choose k • (derivative^[n.succ - k] p * derivative^[k] q) := by
rw [sum_range_succ' _ n.succ, Nat.choose_zero_right, tsub_zero]
congr
refine (sum_range_succ' _ _).trans (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) ?_ ?_)
· rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.choose_succ_self, zero_smul, add_zero]
refine sum_congr rfl fun k hk => ?_
rw [mem_range] at hk
congr
omega
· rw [Nat.choose_zero_right, tsub_zero]
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_mul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_mul
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem derivative_pow_succ (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (p ^ (n + 1)) = C (n + 1 : R) * p ^ n * derivative p :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp) fun n ih => by
rw [pow_succ, derivative_mul, ih, Nat.add_one, mul_right_comm, C_add,
add_mul, add_mul, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_1, one_mul]; simp [add_mul]
#align polynomial.derivative_pow_succ Polynomial.derivative_pow_succ
theorem derivative_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (p ^ n) = C (n : R) * p ^ (n - 1) * derivative p :=
Nat.casesOn n (by rw [pow_zero, derivative_one, Nat.cast_zero, C_0, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun n =>
by rw [p.derivative_pow_succ n, Nat.add_one_sub_one, n.cast_succ]
#align polynomial.derivative_pow Polynomial.derivative_pow
theorem derivative_sq (p : R[X]) : derivative (p ^ 2) = C 2 * p * derivative p := by
rw [derivative_pow_succ, Nat.cast_one, one_add_one_eq_two, pow_one]
#align polynomial.derivative_sq Polynomial.derivative_sq
theorem pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(dvd : q ^ n ∣ p) : q ^ (n - 1) ∣ derivative p := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := dvd
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_pow]
exact (((dvd_mul_left _ _).mul_right _).mul_right _).add ((pow_dvd_pow q n.pred_le).mul_right _)
theorem pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ)
(dvd : q ^ n ∣ p) : q ^ (n - m) ∣ derivative^[m] p := by
induction m generalizing p with
| zero => simpa
| succ m ih =>
rw [Nat.sub_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
exact pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (ih dvd)
theorem pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_pow (p : R[X]) (n m : ℕ) :
p ^ (n - m) ∣ derivative^[m] (p ^ n) := pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd m dvd_rfl
theorem dvd_iterate_derivative_pow (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (c : R) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(n : R) ∣ eval c (derivative^[m] (f ^ n)) := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hm
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply, derivative_pow, mul_assoc, C_eq_natCast,
iterate_derivative_natCast_mul, eval_mul, eval_natCast]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align polynomial.dvd_iterate_derivative_pow Polynomial.dvd_iterate_derivative_pow
theorem iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_natCast_mul (n k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (X ^ n : R[X]) = ↑(Nat.descFactorial n k : R[X]) * X ^ (n - k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· erw [Function.iterate_zero_apply, tsub_zero, Nat.descFactorial_zero, Nat.cast_one, one_mul]
· rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', ih, derivative_natCast_mul, derivative_X_pow, C_eq_natCast,
Nat.descFactorial_succ, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.cast_mul];
simp [mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_nat_cast_mul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_natCast_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_nat_cast_mul := iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_natCast_mul
theorem iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_C_mul (n k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (Nat.descFactorial n k : R) * X ^ (n - k) := by
rw [iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_natCast_mul n k, C_eq_natCast]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_C_mul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_C_mul
theorem iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_smul (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (X ^ n : R[X]) = (Nat.descFactorial n k : R) • X ^ (n - k) := by
rw [iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_C_mul n k, smul_eq_C_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_smul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_smul
theorem derivative_X_add_C_pow (c : R) (m : ℕ) :
derivative ((X + C c) ^ m) = C (m : R) * (X + C c) ^ (m - 1) := by
rw [derivative_pow, derivative_X_add_C, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_add_C_pow Polynomial.derivative_X_add_C_pow
theorem derivative_X_add_C_sq (c : R) : derivative ((X + C c) ^ 2) = C 2 * (X + C c) := by
rw [derivative_sq, derivative_X_add_C, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_add_C_sq Polynomial.derivative_X_add_C_sq
theorem iterate_derivative_X_add_pow (n k : ℕ) (c : R) :
derivative^[k] ((X + C c) ^ n) = Nat.descFactorial n k • (X + C c) ^ (n - k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k IH =>
rw [Nat.sub_succ', Function.iterate_succ_apply', IH, derivative_smul,
derivative_X_add_C_pow, map_natCast, Nat.descFactorial_succ, nsmul_eq_mul, nsmul_eq_mul,
Nat.cast_mul]
ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_add_pow Polynomial.iterate_derivative_X_add_powₓ
theorem derivative_comp (p q : R[X]) :
derivative (p.comp q) = derivative q * p.derivative.comp q := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on'
· simp [*, mul_add]
· simp only [derivative_pow, derivative_mul, monomial_comp, derivative_monomial, derivative_C,
zero_mul, C_eq_natCast, zero_add, RingHom.map_mul]
ring
#align polynomial.derivative_comp Polynomial.derivative_comp
/-- Chain rule for formal derivative of polynomials. -/
theorem derivative_eval₂_C (p q : R[X]) :
derivative (p.eval₂ C q) = p.derivative.eval₂ C q * derivative q :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun r => by rw [eval₂_C, derivative_C, eval₂_zero, zero_mul])
(fun p₁ p₂ ih₁ ih₂ => by
rw [eval₂_add, derivative_add, ih₁, ih₂, derivative_add, eval₂_add, add_mul])
fun n r ih => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, eval₂_mul, eval₂_X, derivative_mul, ih, @derivative_mul _ _ _ X,
derivative_X, mul_one, eval₂_add, @eval₂_mul _ _ _ _ X, eval₂_X, add_mul, mul_right_comm]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_eval₂_C Polynomial.derivative_eval₂_C
theorem derivative_prod [DecidableEq ι] {s : Multiset ι} {f : ι → R[X]} :
derivative (Multiset.map f s).prod =
(Multiset.map (fun i => (Multiset.map f (s.erase i)).prod * derivative (f i)) s).sum := by
refine Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) fun i s h => ?_
rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, derivative_mul, Multiset.map_cons _ i s,
Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.erase_cons_head, mul_comm (derivative (f i))]
congr
rw [h, ← AddMonoidHom.coe_mulLeft, (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft (f i)).map_multiset_sum _,
AddMonoidHom.coe_mulLeft]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Multiset.map_map]
refine congr_arg _ (Multiset.map_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_)
rw [← mul_assoc, ← Multiset.prod_cons, ← Multiset.map_cons]
by_cases hij : i = j
· simp [hij, ← Multiset.prod_cons, ← Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.cons_erase hj]
· simp [hij]
#align polynomial.derivative_prod Polynomial.derivative_prod
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_neg (f : R[X]) : derivative (-f) = -derivative f :=
LinearMap.map_neg derivative f
#align polynomial.derivative_neg Polynomial.derivative_neg
theorem iterate_derivative_neg {f : R[X]} {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (-f) = -derivative^[k] f :=
iterate_map_neg derivative k f
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_neg Polynomial.iterate_derivative_neg
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_sub {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f - g) = derivative f - derivative g :=
LinearMap.map_sub derivative f g
#align polynomial.derivative_sub Polynomial.derivative_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_sub_C (c : R) : derivative (X - C c) = 1 := by
rw [derivative_sub, derivative_X, derivative_C, sub_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_sub_C Polynomial.derivative_X_sub_C
theorem iterate_derivative_sub {k : ℕ} {f g : R[X]} :
derivative^[k] (f - g) = derivative^[k] f - derivative^[k] g :=
iterate_map_sub derivative k f g
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_sub Polynomial.iterate_derivative_sub
@[simp]
theorem derivative_intCast {n : ℤ} : derivative (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast n]
exact derivative_C
#align polynomial.derivative_int_cast Polynomial.derivative_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias derivative_int_cast := derivative_intCast
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Derivative.lean | 612 | 614 | theorem derivative_intCast_mul {n : ℤ} {f : R[X]} : derivative ((n : R[X]) * f) =
n * derivative f := by |
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLinearEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Bilinear
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.sesquilinear_form from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84582d2872fb47c0c17eec7382dc097c9ec7137a"
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This file defines the conversion between sesquilinear forms and matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂` given a basis define a bilinear form
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'` define the bilinear form on `n → R`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂'`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form on `n → R`
## Todos
At the moment this is quite a literal port from `Matrix.BilinearForm`. Everything should be
generalized to fully semibilinear forms.
## Tags
sesquilinear_form, matrix, basis
-/
variable {R R₁ R₂ M M₁ M₂ M₁' M₂' n m n' m' ι : Type*}
open Finset LinearMap Matrix
open Matrix
section AuxToLinearMap
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable (σ₁ : R₁ →+* R) (σ₂ : R₂ →+* R)
/-- The map from `Matrix n n R` to bilinear forms on `n → R`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'`. -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m R) : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R :=
-- Porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
mk₂'ₛₗ σ₁ σ₂ (fun (v : n → R₁) (w : m → R₂) => ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₁ (v i) * f i j * σ₂ (w j))
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, add_mul, sum_add_distrib])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_sum])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, mul_add, sum_add_distrib]) fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_sum]
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_aux Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SesquilinearForm.lean | 66 | 74 | theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis (f : Matrix n m R) (i : n) (j : m) :
f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ (LinearMap.stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(LinearMap.stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) = f i j := by |
rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux, mk₂'ₛₗ_apply]
have : (∑ i', ∑ j', (if i = i' then 1 else 0) * f i' j' * if j = j' then 1 else 0) = f i j := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, ← Finset.mul_sum]
simp only [boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, if_true, mul_comm (f _ _)]
rw [← this]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LocallyIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Urysohn
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.EverywherePos
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
/-!
# Uniqueness of Haar measure in locally compact groups
## Main results
In a locally compact group, we prove that two left-invariant measures `μ'` and `μ` which are finite
on compact sets coincide, up to a normalizing scalar that we denote with `haarScalarFactor μ' μ`,
in the following sense:
* `integral_isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport`: they give the same value to the
integral of continuous compactly supported functions, up to a scalar.
* `measure_isMulInvariant_eq_smul_of_isCompact_closure`: they give the same value to sets with
compact closure, up to a scalar.
* `measure_isHaarMeasure_eq_smul_of_isOpen`: they give the same value to open sets, up to a scalar.
To get genuine equality of measures, we typically need additional regularity assumptions:
* `isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_innerRegular`: two left invariant measures which are
inner regular coincide up to a scalar.
* `isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_regular`: two left invariant measure which are
regular coincide up to a scalar.
* `isHaarMeasure_eq_smul`: in a second countable space, two Haar measures coincide up to a
scalar.
* `isMulInvariant_eq_smul_of_compactSpace`: two left-invariant measures on a compact group coincide
up to a scalar.
* `isHaarMeasure_eq_of_isProbabilityMeasure`: two Haar measures which are probability measures
coincide exactly.
In general, uniqueness statements for Haar measures in the literature make some assumption of
regularity, either regularity or inner regularity. We have tried to minimize the assumptions in the
theorems above, and cover the different results that exist in the literature.
## Implementation
The first result `integral_isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport` is classical. To prove
it, we use a change of variables to express integrals with respect to a left-invariant measure as
integrals with respect to a given right-invariant measure (with a suitable density function).
The uniqueness readily follows.
Uniqueness results for the measure of compact sets and open sets, without any regularity assumption,
are significantly harder. They rely on the completion-regularity of the standard regular Haar
measure. We follow McQuillan's answer at https://mathoverflow.net/questions/456670/.
On second-countable groups, one can arrive to slightly different uniqueness results by using that
the operations are measurable. In particular, one can get uniqueness assuming σ-finiteness of
the measures but discarding the assumption that they are finite on compact sets. See
`haarMeasure_unique` in the file `MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic`.
## References
[Halmos, Measure Theory][halmos1950measure]
[Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 4)][fremlin_vol4]
-/
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace Function MeasureTheory Measure
open scoped Uniformity Topology ENNReal Pointwise NNReal
/-- In a locally compact regular space with an inner regular measure, the measure of a compact
set `k` is the infimum of the integrals of compactly supported functions equal to `1` on `k`. -/
lemma IsCompact.measure_eq_biInf_integral_hasCompactSupport
{X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
{k : Set X} (hk : IsCompact k)
(μ : Measure X) [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] [InnerRegularCompactLTTop μ]
[LocallyCompactSpace X] [RegularSpace X] :
μ k = ⨅ (f : X → ℝ) (_ : Continuous f) (_ : HasCompactSupport f) (_ : EqOn f 1 k)
(_ : 0 ≤ f), ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [le_iInf_iff]
intro f f_cont f_comp fk f_nonneg
apply (f_cont.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport f_comp).measure_le_integral
· exact eventually_of_forall f_nonneg
· exact fun x hx ↦ by simp [fk hx]
· apply le_of_forall_lt' (fun r hr ↦ ?_)
simp only [iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop, exists_and_left]
obtain ⟨U, kU, U_open, mu_U⟩ : ∃ U, k ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r :=
hk.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt r hr
obtain ⟨⟨f, f_cont⟩, fk, fU, f_comp, f_range⟩ : ∃ (f : C(X, ℝ)), EqOn f 1 k ∧ EqOn f 0 Uᶜ
∧ HasCompactSupport f ∧ ∀ (x : X), f x ∈ Icc 0 1 := exists_continuous_one_zero_of_isCompact
hk U_open.isClosed_compl (disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset.mpr kU)
refine ⟨f, f_cont, f_comp, fk, fun x ↦ (f_range x).1, ?_⟩
exact (integral_le_measure (fun x _hx ↦ (f_range x).2) (fun x hx ↦ (fU hx).le)).trans_lt mu_U
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- The parameterized integral `x ↦ ∫ y, g (y⁻¹ * x) ∂μ` depends continuously on `y` when `g` is a
compactly supported continuous function on a topological group `G`, and `μ` is finite on compact
sets. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_integral_apply_inv_mul
{G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [LocallyCompactSpace G] [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
[MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
{μ : Measure G} [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] {g : G → E}
(hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Continuous (fun (x : G) ↦ ∫ y, g (y⁻¹ * x) ∂μ) := by
let k := tsupport g
have k_comp : IsCompact k := h'g
apply continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 (fun x₀ ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨t, t_comp, ht⟩ : ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x₀
let k' : Set G := t • k⁻¹
have k'_comp : IsCompact k' := t_comp.smul_set k_comp.inv
have A : ContinuousOn (fun (x : G) ↦ ∫ y, g (y⁻¹ * x) ∂μ) t := by
apply continuousOn_integral_of_compact_support k'_comp
· exact (hg.comp (continuous_snd.inv.mul continuous_fst)).continuousOn
· intro p x hp hx
contrapose! hx
refine ⟨p, hp, p⁻¹ * x, ?_, by simp⟩
simpa only [Set.mem_inv, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv] using subset_tsupport _ hx
exact A.continuousAt ht
namespace Measure
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
[MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
/-!
### Uniqueness of integrals of compactly supported functions
Two left invariant measures coincide when integrating continuous compactly supported functions,
up to a scalar that we denote with `haarScalarFactor μ' μ `.
This is proved by relating the integral for arbitrary left invariant and right invariant measures,
applying a version of Fubini.
As one may use the same right invariant measure, this shows that two different left invariant
measures will give the same integral, up to some fixed scalar.
-/
/-- In a group with a left invariant measure `μ` and a right invariant measure `ν`, one can express
integrals with respect to `μ` as integrals with respect to `ν` up to a constant scaling factor
(given in the statement as `∫ x, g x ∂μ` where `g` is a fixed reference function) and an
explicit density `y ↦ 1/∫ z, g (z⁻¹ * y) ∂ν`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma integral_isMulLeftInvariant_isMulRightInvariant_combo
{μ ν : Measure G} [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts ν]
[IsMulLeftInvariant μ] [IsMulRightInvariant ν] [IsOpenPosMeasure ν]
{f g : G → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) (g_nonneg : 0 ≤ g) {x₀ : G} (g_pos : g x₀ ≠ 0) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = (∫ y, f y * (∫ z, g (z⁻¹ * y) ∂ν)⁻¹ ∂ν) * ∫ x, g x ∂μ := by
-- The group has to be locally compact, otherwise all integrals vanish and the result is trivial.
rcases h'f.eq_zero_or_locallyCompactSpace_of_group hf with Hf|Hf
· simp [Hf]
let D : G → ℝ := fun (x : G) ↦ ∫ y, g (y⁻¹ * x) ∂ν
have D_cont : Continuous D := continuous_integral_apply_inv_mul hg h'g
have D_pos : ∀ x, 0 < D x := by
intro x
have C : Continuous (fun y ↦ g (y⁻¹ * x)) := hg.comp (continuous_inv.mul continuous_const)
apply (integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg _ _).2
· apply C.isOpen_support.measure_pos ν
exact ⟨x * x₀⁻¹, by simpa using g_pos⟩
· exact fun y ↦ g_nonneg (y⁻¹ * x)
· apply C.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport
exact h'g.comp_homeomorph ((Homeomorph.inv G).trans (Homeomorph.mulRight x))
calc
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x * (D x)⁻¹ * D x ∂μ := by
congr with x; rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel (D_pos x).ne', mul_one]
_ = ∫ x, (∫ y, f x * (D x)⁻¹ * g (y⁻¹ * x) ∂ν) ∂μ := by simp_rw [integral_mul_left]
_ = ∫ y, (∫ x, f x * (D x)⁻¹ * g (y⁻¹ * x) ∂μ) ∂ν := by
apply integral_integral_swap_of_hasCompactSupport
· apply Continuous.mul
· exact (hf.comp continuous_fst).mul
((D_cont.comp continuous_fst).inv₀ (fun x ↦ (D_pos _).ne'))
· exact hg.comp (continuous_snd.inv.mul continuous_fst)
· let K := tsupport f
have K_comp : IsCompact K := h'f
let L := tsupport g
have L_comp : IsCompact L := h'g
let M := (fun (p : G × G) ↦ p.1 * p.2⁻¹) '' (K ×ˢ L)
have M_comp : IsCompact M :=
(K_comp.prod L_comp).image (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd.inv)
have M'_comp : IsCompact (closure M) := M_comp.closure
have : ∀ (p : G × G), p ∉ K ×ˢ closure M → f p.1 * (D p.1)⁻¹ * g (p.2⁻¹ * p.1) = 0 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hxy
by_cases H : x ∈ K; swap
· simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport H]
have : g (y⁻¹ * x) = 0 := by
apply image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport
contrapose! hxy
simp only [mem_prod, H, true_and]
apply subset_closure
simp only [M, mem_image, mem_prod, Prod.exists]
exact ⟨x, y⁻¹ * x, ⟨H, hxy⟩, by group⟩
simp [this]
apply HasCompactSupport.intro' (K_comp.prod M'_comp) ?_ this
exact (isClosed_tsupport f).prod isClosed_closure
_ = ∫ y, (∫ x, f (y * x) * (D (y * x))⁻¹ * g x ∂μ) ∂ν := by
congr with y
rw [← integral_mul_left_eq_self _ y]
simp
_ = ∫ x, (∫ y, f (y * x) * (D (y * x))⁻¹ * g x ∂ν) ∂μ := by
apply (integral_integral_swap_of_hasCompactSupport _ _).symm
· apply Continuous.mul ?_ (hg.comp continuous_fst)
exact (hf.comp (continuous_snd.mul continuous_fst)).mul
((D_cont.comp (continuous_snd.mul continuous_fst)).inv₀ (fun x ↦ (D_pos _).ne'))
· let K := tsupport f
have K_comp : IsCompact K := h'f
let L := tsupport g
have L_comp : IsCompact L := h'g
let M := (fun (p : G × G) ↦ p.1 * p.2⁻¹) '' (K ×ˢ L)
have M_comp : IsCompact M :=
(K_comp.prod L_comp).image (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd.inv)
have M'_comp : IsCompact (closure M) := M_comp.closure
have : ∀ (p : G × G), p ∉ L ×ˢ closure M →
f (p.2 * p.1) * (D (p.2 * p.1))⁻¹ * g p.1 = 0 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hxy
by_cases H : x ∈ L; swap
· simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport H]
have : f (y * x) = 0 := by
apply image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport
contrapose! hxy
simp only [mem_prod, H, true_and]
apply subset_closure
simp only [M, mem_image, mem_prod, Prod.exists]
exact ⟨y * x, x, ⟨hxy, H⟩, by group⟩
simp [this]
apply HasCompactSupport.intro' (L_comp.prod M'_comp) ?_ this
exact (isClosed_tsupport g).prod isClosed_closure
_ = ∫ x, (∫ y, f y * (D y)⁻¹ ∂ν) * g x ∂μ := by
simp_rw [integral_mul_right]
congr with x
conv_rhs => rw [← integral_mul_right_eq_self _ x]
_ = (∫ y, f y * (D y)⁻¹ ∂ν) * ∫ x, g x ∂μ := integral_mul_left _ _
/-- Given two left-invariant measures which are finite on
compacts, they coincide in the following sense: they give the same value to the integral of
continuous compactly supported functions, up to a multiplicative constant. -/
@[to_additive exists_integral_isAddLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport]
lemma exists_integral_isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport (μ' μ : Measure G)
[IsHaarMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ'] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ'] :
∃ (c : ℝ≥0), ∀ (f : G → ℝ), Continuous f → HasCompactSupport f →
∫ x, f x ∂μ' = ∫ x, f x ∂(c • μ) := by
-- The group has to be locally compact, otherwise all integrals vanish and the result is trivial.
by_cases H : LocallyCompactSpace G; swap
· refine ⟨0, fun f f_cont f_comp ↦ ?_⟩
rcases f_comp.eq_zero_or_locallyCompactSpace_of_group f_cont with hf|hf
· simp [hf]
· exact (H hf).elim
-- Fix some nonzero continuous function with compact support `g`.
obtain ⟨⟨g, g_cont⟩, g_comp, g_nonneg, g_one⟩ :
∃ (g : C(G, ℝ)), HasCompactSupport g ∧ 0 ≤ g ∧ g 1 ≠ 0 := exists_continuous_nonneg_pos 1
have int_g_pos : 0 < ∫ x, g x ∂μ :=
g_cont.integral_pos_of_hasCompactSupport_nonneg_nonzero g_comp g_nonneg g_one
-- The proportionality constant we are looking for will be the ratio of the integrals of `g`
-- with respect to `μ'` and `μ`.
let c : ℝ := (∫ x, g x ∂μ) ⁻¹ * (∫ x, g x ∂μ')
have c_nonneg : 0 ≤ c :=
mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 (integral_nonneg g_nonneg)) (integral_nonneg g_nonneg)
refine ⟨⟨c, c_nonneg⟩, fun f f_cont f_comp ↦ ?_⟩
/- use the lemma `integral_mulLeftInvariant_mulRightInvariant_combo` for `μ` and then `μ'`
to reexpress the integral of `f` as the integral of `g` times a factor which only depends
on a right-invariant measure `ν`. We use `ν = μ.inv` for convenience. -/
let ν := μ.inv
have A : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = (∫ y, f y * (∫ z, g (z⁻¹ * y) ∂ν)⁻¹ ∂ν) * ∫ x, g x ∂μ :=
integral_isMulLeftInvariant_isMulRightInvariant_combo f_cont f_comp g_cont g_comp g_nonneg g_one
rw [← mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ int_g_pos.ne'] at A
have B : ∫ x, f x ∂μ' = (∫ y, f y * (∫ z, g (z⁻¹ * y) ∂ν)⁻¹ ∂ν) * ∫ x, g x ∂μ' :=
integral_isMulLeftInvariant_isMulRightInvariant_combo f_cont f_comp g_cont g_comp g_nonneg g_one
/- Since the `ν`-factor is the same for `μ` and `μ'`, this gives the result. -/
rw [← A, mul_assoc, mul_comm] at B
simp only [B, integral_smul_nnreal_measure]
rfl
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given two left-invariant measures which are finite on compacts, `haarScalarFactor μ' μ` is a
scalar such that `∫ f dμ' = (haarScalarFactor μ' μ) ∫ f dμ` for any compactly supported continuous
function `f`.
Note that there is a dissymmetry in the assumptions between `μ'` and `μ`: the measure `μ'` needs
only be finite on compact sets, while `μ` has to be finite on compact sets and positive on open
sets, i.e., a Haar measure, to exclude for instance the case where `μ = 0`, where the definition
doesn't make sense. -/
@[to_additive "Given two left-invariant measures which are finite on compacts,
`addHaarScalarFactor μ' μ` is a scalar such that `∫ f dμ' = (addHaarScalarFactor μ' μ) ∫ f dμ` for
any compactly supported continuous function `f`.
Note that there is a dissymmetry in the assumptions between `μ'` and `μ`: the measure `μ'` needs
only be finite on compact sets, while `μ` has to be finite on compact sets and positive on open
sets, i.e., an additive Haar measure, to exclude for instance the case where `μ = 0`, where the
definition doesn't make sense."]
noncomputable def haarScalarFactor
(μ' μ : Measure G) [IsHaarMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ'] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ'] :
ℝ≥0 :=
if ¬ LocallyCompactSpace G then 1
else (exists_integral_isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport μ' μ).choose
/-- Two left invariant measures integrate in the same way continuous compactly supported functions,
up to the scalar `haarScalarFactor μ' μ`. See also
`measure_isMulInvariant_eq_smul_of_isCompact_closure`, which gives the same result for compact
sets, and `measure_isHaarMeasure_eq_smul_of_isOpen` for open sets. -/
@[to_additive integral_isAddLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport
"Two left invariant measures integrate in the same way continuous compactly supported functions,
up to the scalar `addHaarScalarFactor μ' μ`. See also
`measure_isAddInvariant_eq_smul_of_isCompact_closure`, which gives the same result for compact
sets, and `measure_isAddHaarMeasure_eq_smul_of_isOpen` for open sets."]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean | 309 | 318 | theorem integral_isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport
(μ' μ : Measure G) [IsHaarMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ'] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ']
{f : G → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ' = ∫ x, f x ∂(haarScalarFactor μ' μ • μ) := by |
classical
rcases h'f.eq_zero_or_locallyCompactSpace_of_group hf with Hf|Hf
· simp [Hf]
· simp only [haarScalarFactor, Hf, not_true_eq_false, ite_false]
exact (exists_integral_isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_hasCompactSupport μ' μ).choose_spec
f hf h'f
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 241 | 242 | theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by |
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Data.TypeVec
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
#align_import control.functor.multivariate from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"008205aa645b3f194c1da47025c5f110c8406eab"
/-!
# Functors between the category of tuples of types, and the category Type
Features:
* `MvFunctor n` : the type class of multivariate functors
* `f <$$> x` : notation for map
-/
universe u v w
open MvFunctor
/-- Multivariate functors, i.e. functor between the category of type vectors
and the category of Type -/
class MvFunctor {n : ℕ} (F : TypeVec n → Type*) where
/-- Multivariate map, if `f : α ⟹ β` and `x : F α` then `f <$$> x : F β`. -/
map : ∀ {α β : TypeVec n}, α ⟹ β → F α → F β
#align mvfunctor MvFunctor
/-- Multivariate map, if `f : α ⟹ β` and `x : F α` then `f <$$> x : F β` -/
scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:100 " <$$> " => MvFunctor.map
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace MvFunctor
variable {α β γ : TypeVec.{u} n} {F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type v} [MvFunctor F]
/-- predicate lifting over multivariate functors -/
def LiftP {α : TypeVec n} (P : ∀ i, α i → Prop) (x : F α) : Prop :=
∃ u : F (fun i => Subtype (P i)), (fun i => @Subtype.val _ (P i)) <$$> u = x
#align mvfunctor.liftp MvFunctor.LiftP
/-- relational lifting over multivariate functors -/
def LiftR {α : TypeVec n} (R : ∀ {i}, α i → α i → Prop) (x y : F α) : Prop :=
∃ u : F (fun i => { p : α i × α i // R p.fst p.snd }),
(fun i (t : { p : α i × α i // R p.fst p.snd }) => t.val.fst) <$$> u = x ∧
(fun i (t : { p : α i × α i // R p.fst p.snd }) => t.val.snd) <$$> u = y
#align mvfunctor.liftr MvFunctor.LiftR
/-- given `x : F α` and a projection `i` of type vector `α`, `supp x i` is the set
of `α.i` contained in `x` -/
def supp {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) (i : Fin2 n) : Set (α i) :=
{ y : α i | ∀ ⦃P⦄, LiftP P x → P i y }
#align mvfunctor.supp MvFunctor.supp
theorem of_mem_supp {α : TypeVec n} {x : F α} {P : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → Prop} (h : LiftP P x) (i : Fin2 n) :
∀ y ∈ supp x i, P y := fun _y hy => hy h
#align mvfunctor.of_mem_supp MvFunctor.of_mem_supp
end MvFunctor
/-- laws for `MvFunctor` -/
class LawfulMvFunctor {n : ℕ} (F : TypeVec n → Type*) [MvFunctor F] : Prop where
/-- `map` preserved identities, i.e., maps identity on `α` to identity on `F α` -/
id_map : ∀ {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α), TypeVec.id <$$> x = x
/-- `map` preserves compositions -/
comp_map :
∀ {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) (h : β ⟹ γ) (x : F α), (h ⊚ g) <$$> x = h <$$> g <$$> x
#align is_lawful_mvfunctor LawfulMvFunctor
open Nat TypeVec
namespace MvFunctor
export LawfulMvFunctor (comp_map)
open LawfulMvFunctor
variable {α β γ : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable {F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type v} [MvFunctor F]
variable (P : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) (R : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- adapt `MvFunctor.LiftP` to accept predicates as arrows -/
def LiftP' : F α → Prop :=
MvFunctor.LiftP fun i x => ofRepeat <| P i x
#align mvfunctor.liftp' MvFunctor.LiftP'
/-- adapt `MvFunctor.LiftR` to accept relations as arrows -/
def LiftR' : F α → F α → Prop :=
MvFunctor.LiftR @fun i x y => ofRepeat <| R i <| TypeVec.prod.mk _ x y
#align mvfunctor.liftr' MvFunctor.LiftR'
variable [LawfulMvFunctor F]
@[simp]
theorem id_map (x : F α) : TypeVec.id <$$> x = x :=
LawfulMvFunctor.id_map x
#align mvfunctor.id_map MvFunctor.id_map
@[simp]
theorem id_map' (x : F α) : (fun _i a => a) <$$> x = x :=
id_map x
#align mvfunctor.id_map' MvFunctor.id_map'
theorem map_map (g : α ⟹ β) (h : β ⟹ γ) (x : F α) : h <$$> g <$$> x = (h ⊚ g) <$$> x :=
Eq.symm <| comp_map _ _ _
#align mvfunctor.map_map MvFunctor.map_map
section LiftP'
variable (F)
theorem exists_iff_exists_of_mono {P : F α → Prop} {q : F β → Prop}
(f : α ⟹ β) (g : β ⟹ α)
(h₀ : f ⊚ g = TypeVec.id)
(h₁ : ∀ u : F α, P u ↔ q (f <$$> u)) :
(∃ u : F α, P u) ↔ ∃ u : F β, q u := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨u, h₂⟩
· refine ⟨f <$$> u, ?_⟩
apply (h₁ u).mp h₂
· refine ⟨g <$$> u, ?_⟩
rw [h₁]
simp only [MvFunctor.map_map, h₀, LawfulMvFunctor.id_map, h₂]
#align mvfunctor.exists_iff_exists_of_mono MvFunctor.exists_iff_exists_of_mono
variable {F}
theorem LiftP_def (x : F α) : LiftP' P x ↔ ∃ u : F (Subtype_ P), subtypeVal P <$$> u = x :=
exists_iff_exists_of_mono F _ _ (toSubtype_of_subtype P) (by simp [MvFunctor.map_map])
#align mvfunctor.liftp_def MvFunctor.LiftP_def
theorem LiftR_def (x y : F α) :
LiftR' R x y ↔
∃ u : F (Subtype_ R),
(TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ subtypeVal R) <$$> u = x ∧
(TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ subtypeVal R) <$$> u = y :=
exists_iff_exists_of_mono _ _ _ (toSubtype'_of_subtype' R) (by
simp only [map_map, comp_assoc, subtypeVal_toSubtype']
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [comp])
#align mvfunctor.liftr_def MvFunctor.LiftR_def
end LiftP'
end MvFunctor
open Nat
namespace MvFunctor
open TypeVec
section LiftPLastPredIff
variable {F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*} [MvFunctor F] [LawfulMvFunctor F] {α : TypeVec.{u} n}
open MvFunctor
variable {β : Type u}
variable (pp : β → Prop)
private def f :
∀ n α,
(fun i : Fin2 (n + 1) => { p_1 // ofRepeat (PredLast' α pp i p_1) }) ⟹ fun i : Fin2 (n + 1) =>
{ p_1 : (α ::: β) i // PredLast α pp p_1 }
| _, α, Fin2.fs i, x =>
⟨x.val, cast (by simp only [PredLast]; erw [const_iff_true]) x.property⟩
| _, α, Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, x.property⟩
private def g :
∀ n α,
(fun i : Fin2 (n + 1) => { p_1 : (α ::: β) i // PredLast α pp p_1 }) ⟹ fun i : Fin2 (n + 1) =>
{ p_1 // ofRepeat (PredLast' α pp i p_1) }
| _, α, Fin2.fs i, x =>
⟨x.val, cast (by simp only [PredLast]; erw [const_iff_true]) x.property⟩
| _, α, Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, x.property⟩
| Mathlib/Control/Functor/Multivariate.lean | 186 | 198 | theorem LiftP_PredLast_iff {β} (P : β → Prop) (x : F (α ::: β)) :
LiftP' (PredLast' _ P) x ↔ LiftP (PredLast _ P) x := by |
dsimp only [LiftP, LiftP']
apply exists_iff_exists_of_mono F (f _ n α) (g _ n α)
· ext i ⟨x, _⟩
cases i <;> rfl
· intros
rw [MvFunctor.map_map]
dsimp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [(· ⊚ ·)]
suffices (fun i => Subtype.val) = (fun i x => (MvFunctor.f P n α i x).val)
by rw [this];
ext i ⟨x, _⟩
cases i <;> rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Log
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.base from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
/-!
# Real logarithm base `b`
In this file we define `Real.logb` to be the logarithm of a real number in a given base `b`. We
define this as the division of the natural logarithms of the argument and the base, so that we have
a globally defined function with `logb b 0 = 0`, `logb b (-x) = logb b x` `logb 0 x = 0` and
`logb (-b) x = logb b x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and its relation to `rpow`.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {b x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm in a given base. As with the natural logarithm, we define `logb b x` to
be `logb b |x|` for `x < 0`, and `0` for `x = 0`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def logb (b x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log x / log b
#align real.logb Real.logb
theorem log_div_log : log x / log b = logb b x :=
rfl
#align real.log_div_log Real.log_div_log
@[simp]
theorem logb_zero : logb b 0 = 0 := by simp [logb]
#align real.logb_zero Real.logb_zero
@[simp]
theorem logb_one : logb b 1 = 0 := by simp [logb]
#align real.logb_one Real.logb_one
@[simp]
lemma logb_self_eq_one (hb : 1 < b) : logb b b = 1 :=
div_self (log_pos hb).ne'
lemma logb_self_eq_one_iff : logb b b = 1 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ -1 :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h h' => by simp [logb, h'] at h, div_self⟩ log_ne_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Base.lean | 64 | 64 | theorem logb_abs (x : ℝ) : logb b |x| = logb b x := by | rw [logb, logb, log_abs]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
#align_import measure_theory.measure.haar.of_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
/-!
# Additive Haar measure constructed from a basis
Given a basis of a finite-dimensional real vector space, we define the corresponding Lebesgue
measure, which gives measure `1` to the parallelepiped spanned by the basis.
## Main definitions
* `parallelepiped v` is the parallelepiped spanned by a finite family of vectors.
* `Basis.parallelepiped` is the parallelepiped associated to a basis, seen as a compact set with
nonempty interior.
* `Basis.addHaar` is the Lebesgue measure associated to a basis, giving measure `1` to the
corresponding parallelepiped.
In particular, we declare a `MeasureSpace` instance on any finite-dimensional inner product space,
by using the Lebesgue measure associated to some orthonormal basis (which is in fact independent
of the basis).
-/
open Set TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure FiniteDimensional
open scoped Pointwise
noncomputable section
variable {ι ι' E F : Type*}
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι] [Fintype ι']
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module ℝ F]
/-- The closed parallelepiped spanned by a finite family of vectors. -/
def parallelepiped (v : ι → E) : Set E :=
(fun t : ι → ℝ => ∑ i, t i • v i) '' Icc 0 1
#align parallelepiped parallelepiped
theorem mem_parallelepiped_iff (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
x ∈ parallelepiped v ↔ ∃ t ∈ Icc (0 : ι → ℝ) 1, x = ∑ i, t i • v i := by
simp [parallelepiped, eq_comm]
#align mem_parallelepiped_iff mem_parallelepiped_iff
theorem parallelepiped_basis_eq (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
parallelepiped b = {x | ∀ i, b.repr x i ∈ Set.Icc 0 1} := by
classical
ext x
simp_rw [mem_parallelepiped_iff, mem_setOf_eq, b.ext_elem_iff, _root_.map_sum,
_root_.map_smul, Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single, smul_eq_mul,
mul_one, Finsupp.single_apply, Finset.sum_ite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, mem_Icc,
Pi.le_def, Pi.zero_apply, Pi.one_apply, ← forall_and]
aesop
theorem image_parallelepiped (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] F) (v : ι → E) :
f '' parallelepiped v = parallelepiped (f ∘ v) := by
simp only [parallelepiped, ← image_comp]
congr 1 with t
simp only [Function.comp_apply, _root_.map_sum, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply]
#align image_parallelepiped image_parallelepiped
/-- Reindexing a family of vectors does not change their parallelepiped. -/
@[simp]
theorem parallelepiped_comp_equiv (v : ι → E) (e : ι' ≃ ι) :
parallelepiped (v ∘ e) = parallelepiped v := by
simp only [parallelepiped]
let K : (ι' → ℝ) ≃ (ι → ℝ) := Equiv.piCongrLeft' (fun _a : ι' => ℝ) e
have : Icc (0 : ι → ℝ) 1 = K '' Icc (0 : ι' → ℝ) 1 := by
rw [← Equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image]
ext x
simp only [K, mem_preimage, mem_Icc, Pi.le_def, Pi.zero_apply, Equiv.piCongrLeft'_apply,
Pi.one_apply]
refine
⟨fun h => ⟨fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_⟩, fun h =>
⟨fun i => h.1 (e.symm i), fun i => h.2 (e.symm i)⟩⟩
· simpa only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply] using h.1 (e i)
· simpa only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply] using h.2 (e i)
rw [this, ← image_comp]
congr 1 with x
have := fun z : ι' → ℝ => e.symm.sum_comp fun i => z i • v (e i)
simp_rw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply] at this
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mem_image, mem_Icc, K, Equiv.piCongrLeft'_apply, this]
#align parallelepiped_comp_equiv parallelepiped_comp_equiv
-- The parallelepiped associated to an orthonormal basis of `ℝ` is either `[0, 1]` or `[-1, 0]`.
theorem parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ ℝ) :
parallelepiped b = Icc 0 1 ∨ parallelepiped b = Icc (-1) 0 := by
have e : ι ≃ Fin 1 := by
apply Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq
simp only [← finrank_eq_card_basis b.toBasis, finrank_self]
have B : parallelepiped (b.reindex e) = parallelepiped b := by
convert parallelepiped_comp_equiv b e.symm
ext i
simp only [OrthonormalBasis.coe_reindex]
rw [← B]
let F : ℝ → Fin 1 → ℝ := fun t => fun _i => t
have A : Icc (0 : Fin 1 → ℝ) 1 = F '' Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro x hx
refine ⟨x 0, ⟨hx.1 0, hx.2 0⟩, ?_⟩
ext j
simp only [Subsingleton.elim j 0]
· rintro x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun _j => hy.1, fun _j => hy.2⟩
rcases orthonormalBasis_one_dim (b.reindex e) with (H | H)
· left
simp_rw [parallelepiped, H, A, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
simp only [Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, Finset.sum_singleton,
← image_comp, Function.comp_apply, image_id', ge_iff_le, zero_le_one, not_true, gt_iff_lt]
· right
simp_rw [H, parallelepiped, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, A]
simp only [F, Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, mul_neg, mul_one, Finset.sum_neg_distrib,
Finset.sum_singleton, ← image_comp, Function.comp, image_neg, preimage_neg_Icc, neg_zero]
#align parallelepiped_orthonormal_basis_one_dim parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim
theorem parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment (v : ι → E) : parallelepiped v = ∑ i, segment ℝ 0 (v i) := by
ext
simp only [mem_parallelepiped_iff, Set.mem_finset_sum, Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left,
segment_eq_image, smul_zero, zero_add, ← Set.pi_univ_Icc, Set.mem_univ_pi]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t • v, fun {i} => ⟨t i, ht _, by simp⟩, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
choose t ht hg using @hg
refine ⟨@t, @ht, ?_⟩
simp_rw [hg]
#align parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment
theorem convex_parallelepiped (v : ι → E) : Convex ℝ (parallelepiped v) := by
rw [parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment]
exact convex_sum _ fun _i _hi => convex_segment _ _
#align convex_parallelepiped convex_parallelepiped
/-- A `parallelepiped` is the convex hull of its vertices -/
theorem parallelepiped_eq_convexHull (v : ι → E) :
parallelepiped v = convexHull ℝ (∑ i, {(0 : E), v i}) := by
simp_rw [convexHull_sum, convexHull_pair, parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment]
#align parallelepiped_eq_convex_hull parallelepiped_eq_convexHull
/-- The axis aligned parallelepiped over `ι → ℝ` is a cuboid. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/OfBasis.lean | 153 | 181 | theorem parallelepiped_single [DecidableEq ι] (a : ι → ℝ) :
(parallelepiped fun i => Pi.single i (a i)) = Set.uIcc 0 a := by |
ext x
simp_rw [Set.uIcc, mem_parallelepiped_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Pi.le_def, ← forall_and, Pi.inf_apply,
Pi.sup_apply, ← Pi.single_smul', Pi.one_apply, Pi.zero_apply, ← Pi.smul_apply',
Finset.univ_sum_single (_ : ι → ℝ)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ i
specialize ht i
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, Pi.mul_apply]
rcases le_total (a i) 0 with hai | hai
· rw [sup_eq_left.mpr hai, inf_eq_right.mpr hai]
exact ⟨le_mul_of_le_one_left hai ht.2, mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ht.1 hai⟩
· rw [sup_eq_right.mpr hai, inf_eq_left.mpr hai]
exact ⟨mul_nonneg ht.1 hai, mul_le_of_le_one_left hai ht.2⟩
· intro h
refine ⟨fun i => x i / a i, fun i => ?_, funext fun i => ?_⟩
· specialize h i
rcases le_total (a i) 0 with hai | hai
· rw [sup_eq_left.mpr hai, inf_eq_right.mpr hai] at h
exact ⟨div_nonneg_of_nonpos h.2 hai, div_le_one_of_ge h.1 hai⟩
· rw [sup_eq_right.mpr hai, inf_eq_left.mpr hai] at h
exact ⟨div_nonneg h.1 hai, div_le_one_of_le h.2 hai⟩
· specialize h i
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.mul_apply]
rcases eq_or_ne (a i) 0 with hai | hai
· rw [hai, inf_idem, sup_idem, ← le_antisymm_iff] at h
rw [hai, ← h, zero_div, zero_mul]
· rw [div_mul_cancel₀ _ hai]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Newell Jensen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Newell Jensen, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PresentedGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Matrix
/-!
# Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems
This file defines Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems.
Let `B` be a (possibly infinite) type, and let $M = (M_{i,i'})_{i, i' \in B}$ be a matrix
of natural numbers. Further assume that $M$ is a *Coxeter matrix* (`CoxeterMatrix`); that is, $M$ is
symmetric and $M_{i,i'} = 1$ if and only if $i = i'$. The *Coxeter group* associated to $M$
(`CoxeterMatrix.group`) has the presentation
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$
The elements $s_i$ are called the *simple reflections* (`CoxeterMatrix.simple`) of the Coxeter
group. Note that every simple reflection is an involution.
A *Coxeter system* (`CoxeterSystem`) is a group $W$, together with an isomorphism between $W$ and
the Coxeter group associated to some Coxeter matrix $M$. By abuse of language, we also say that $W$
is a Coxeter group (`IsCoxeterGroup`), and we may speak of the simple reflections $s_i \in W$
(`CoxeterSystem.simple`). We state all of our results about Coxeter groups in terms of Coxeter
systems where possible.
Let $W$ be a group equipped with a Coxeter system. For all monoids $G$ and all functions
$f \colon B \to G$ whose values satisfy the Coxeter relations, we may lift $f$ to a multiplicative
homomorphism $W \to G$ (`CoxeterSystem.lift`) in a unique way.
A *word* is a sequence of elements of $B$. The word $(i_1, \ldots, i_\ell)$ has a corresponding
product $s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell} \in W$ (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd`). Every element of $W$ is the
product of some word (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd_surjective`). The words that alternate between two
elements of $B$ (`CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`) are particularly important.
## Implementation details
Much of the literature on Coxeter groups conflates the set $S = \{s_i : i \in B\} \subseteq W$ of
simple reflections with the set $B$ that indexes the simple reflections. This is usually permissible
because the simple reflections $s_i$ of any Coxeter group are all distinct (a nontrivial fact that
we do not prove in this file). In contrast, we try not to refer to the set $S$ of simple
reflections unless necessary; instead, we state our results in terms of $B$ wherever possible.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterMatrix.Group`
* `CoxeterSystem`
* `IsCoxeterGroup`
* `CoxeterSystem.simple` : If `cs` is a Coxeter system on the group `W`, then `cs.simple i` is the
simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.lift` : Extend a function `f : B → G` to a monoid homomorphism `f' : W → G`
satisfying `f' (cs.simple i) = f i` for all `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.wordProd`
* `CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 4--6*](bourbaki1968) chapter IV
pages 4--5, 13--15
* [J. Baez, *Coxeter and Dynkin Diagrams*](https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/twf_dynkin.pdf)
## TODO
* The simple reflections of a Coxeter system are distinct.
* Introduce some ways to actually construct some Coxeter groups. For example, given a Coxeter matrix
$M : B \times B \to \mathbb{N}$, a real vector space $V$, a basis $\{\alpha_i : i \in B\}$
and a bilinear form $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle \colon V \times V \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying
$$\langle \alpha_i, \alpha_{i'}\rangle = - \cos(\pi / M_{i,i'}),$$ one can form the subgroup of
$GL(V)$ generated by the reflections in the $\alpha_i$, and it is a Coxeter group. We can use this
to combinatorially describe the Coxeter groups of type $A$, $B$, $D$, and $I$.
* State and prove Matsumoto's theorem.
* Classify the finite Coxeter groups.
## Tags
coxeter system, coxeter group
-/
open Function Set List
/-! ### Coxeter groups -/
namespace CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B) (e : B ≃ B')
/-- The Coxeter relation associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$ and two indices $i, i' \in B$.
That is, the relation $(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}$, considered as an element of the free group
on $\{s_i\}_{i \in B}$.
If $M_{i, i'} = 0$, then this is the identity, indicating that there is no relation between
$s_i$ and $s_{i'}$. -/
def relation (i i' : B) : FreeGroup B := (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i'
/-- The set of all Coxeter relations associated to the Coxeter matrix $M$. -/
def relationsSet : Set (FreeGroup B) := range <| uncurry M.relation
/-- The Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$; that is, the group
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$ -/
protected def Group : Type _ := PresentedGroup M.relationsSet
instance : Group M.Group := QuotientGroup.Quotient.group _
/-- The simple reflection of the Coxeter group `M.group` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : M.Group := PresentedGroup.of i
theorem reindex_relationsSet :
(M.reindex e).relationsSet =
FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e '' M.relationsSet := let M' := M.reindex e; calc
Set.range (uncurry M'.relation)
_ = Set.range (uncurry M'.relation ∘ Prod.map e e) := by simp [Set.range_comp]
_ = Set.range (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e ∘ uncurry M.relation) := by
apply congrArg Set.range
ext ⟨i, i'⟩
simp [relation, reindex_apply, M']
_ = _ := by simp [Set.range_comp, relationsSet]
/-- The isomorphism between the Coxeter group associated to the reindexed matrix `M.reindex e` and
the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def reindexGroupEquiv : (M.reindex e).Group ≃* M.Group :=
.symm <| QuotientGroup.congr
(Subgroup.normalClosure M.relationsSet)
(Subgroup.normalClosure (M.reindex e).relationsSet)
(FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e)
(by
rw [reindex_relationsSet,
Subgroup.map_normalClosure _ _ (by simpa using (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e).surjective),
MonoidHom.coe_coe])
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_apply_simple (i : B') :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e) ((M.reindex e).simple i) = M.simple (e.symm i) := rfl
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_symm_apply_simple (i : B) :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm (M.simple i) = (M.reindex e).simple (e i) := rfl
end CoxeterMatrix
/-! ### Coxeter systems -/
section
variable {B : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B)
/-- A Coxeter system `CoxeterSystem M W` is a structure recording the isomorphism between
a group `W` and the Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
@[ext]
structure CoxeterSystem (W : Type*) [Group W] where
/-- The isomorphism between `W` and the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
mulEquiv : W ≃* M.Group
/-- A group is a Coxeter group if it admits a Coxeter system for some Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
class IsCoxeterGroup.{u} (W : Type u) [Group W] : Prop where
nonempty_system : ∃ B : Type u, ∃ M : CoxeterMatrix B, Nonempty (CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- The canonical Coxeter system on the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem : CoxeterSystem M M.Group := ⟨.refl _⟩
end
namespace CoxeterSystem
open CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (e : B ≃ B')
variable {W H : Type*} [Group W] [Group H]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- Reindex a Coxeter system through a bijection of the indexing sets. -/
@[simps]
protected def reindex (e : B ≃ B') : CoxeterSystem (M.reindex e) W :=
⟨cs.mulEquiv.trans (M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm⟩
/-- Push a Coxeter system through a group isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (e : W ≃* H) : CoxeterSystem M H := ⟨e.symm.trans cs.mulEquiv⟩
/-! ### Simple reflections -/
/-- The simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : W := cs.mulEquiv.symm (PresentedGroup.of i)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem_simple (M : CoxeterMatrix B) :
M.toCoxeterSystem.simple = M.simple := rfl
@[simp] theorem reindex_simple (i' : B') : (cs.reindex e).simple i' = cs.simple (e.symm i') := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_simple (e : W ≃* H) (i : B) : (cs.map e).simple i = e (cs.simple i) := rfl
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_self (i : B) : s i * s i = 1 := by
have : (FreeGroup.of i) * (FreeGroup.of i) ∈ M.relationsSet := ⟨(i, i), by simp [relation]⟩
have : (QuotientGroup.mk (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i) : M.Group) = 1 :=
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr (Subgroup.subset_normalClosure this)
unfold simple
rw [← map_mul, PresentedGroup.of, ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, this, map_one]
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_cancel_right {w : W} (i : B) : w * s i * s i = w := by
simp [mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_cancel_left {w : W} (i : B) : s i * (s i * w) = w := by
simp [← mul_assoc]
@[simp] theorem simple_sq (i : B) : s i ^ 2 = 1 := pow_two (s i) ▸ cs.simple_mul_simple_self i
@[simp]
theorem inv_simple (i : B) : (s i)⁻¹ = s i :=
(eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (cs.simple_mul_simple_self i)).symm
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_pow (i i' : B) : (s i * s i') ^ M i i' = 1 := by
have : (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i' ∈ M.relationsSet := ⟨(i, i'), rfl⟩
have : (QuotientGroup.mk ((FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i') : M.Group) = 1 :=
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr (Subgroup.subset_normalClosure this)
unfold simple
rw [← map_mul, ← map_pow, PresentedGroup.of, PresentedGroup.of,
← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, ← QuotientGroup.mk_pow, this, map_one]
@[simp] theorem simple_mul_simple_pow' (i i' : B) : (s i' * s i) ^ M i i' = 1 :=
M.symmetric i' i ▸ cs.simple_mul_simple_pow i' i
/-- The simple reflections of `W` generate `W` as a group. -/
theorem subgroup_closure_range_simple : Subgroup.closure (range cs.simple) = ⊤ := by
have : cs.simple = cs.mulEquiv.symm ∘ PresentedGroup.of := rfl
rw [this, Set.range_comp, ← MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, ← MonoidHom.map_closure,
PresentedGroup.closure_range_of, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
exact MonoidHom.range_top_of_surjective _ (MulEquiv.surjective _)
/-- The simple reflections of `W` generate `W` as a monoid. -/
theorem submonoid_closure_range_simple : Submonoid.closure (range cs.simple) = ⊤ := by
have : range cs.simple = range cs.simple ∪ (range cs.simple)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_range, inv_simple, union_self]
rw [this, ← Subgroup.closure_toSubmonoid, subgroup_closure_range_simple, Subgroup.top_toSubmonoid]
/-! ### Induction principles for Coxeter systems -/
/-- If `p : W → Prop` holds for all simple reflections, it holds for the identity, and it is
preserved under multiplication, then it holds for all elements of `W`. -/
theorem simple_induction {p : W → Prop} (w : W) (simple : ∀ i : B, p (s i)) (one : p 1)
(mul : ∀ w w' : W, p w → p w' → p (w * w')) : p w := by
have := cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple.symm ▸ Submonoid.mem_top w
exact Submonoid.closure_induction this (fun x ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ hi ▸ simple i) one mul
/-- If `p : W → Prop` holds for the identity and it is preserved under multiplying on the left
by a simple reflection, then it holds for all elements of `W`. -/
theorem simple_induction_left {p : W → Prop} (w : W) (one : p 1)
(mul_simple_left : ∀ (w : W) (i : B), p w → p (s i * w)) : p w := by
let p' : (w : W) → w ∈ Submonoid.closure (Set.range cs.simple) → Prop :=
fun w _ ↦ p w
have := cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple.symm ▸ Submonoid.mem_top w
apply Submonoid.closure_induction_left (p := p')
· exact one
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ y _
exact mul_simple_left y i
· exact this
/-- If `p : W → Prop` holds for the identity and it is preserved under multiplying on the right
by a simple reflection, then it holds for all elements of `W`. -/
theorem simple_induction_right {p : W → Prop} (w : W) (one : p 1)
(mul_simple_right : ∀ (w : W) (i : B), p w → p (w * s i)) : p w := by
let p' : ((w : W) → w ∈ Submonoid.closure (Set.range cs.simple) → Prop) :=
fun w _ ↦ p w
have := cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple.symm ▸ Submonoid.mem_top w
apply Submonoid.closure_induction_right (p := p')
· exact one
· rintro x _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact mul_simple_right x i
· exact this
/-! ### Homomorphisms from a Coxeter group -/
/-- If two homomorphisms with domain `W` agree on all simple reflections, then they are equal. -/
theorem ext_simple {G : Type*} [Monoid G] {φ₁ φ₂ : W →* G} (h : ∀ i : B, φ₁ (s i) = φ₂ (s i)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple (fun _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ hi ▸ h i)
/-- The proposition that the values of the function `f : B → G` satisfy the Coxeter relations
corresponding to the matrix `M`. -/
def _root_.CoxeterMatrix.IsLiftable {G : Type*} [Monoid G] (M : CoxeterMatrix B) (f : B → G) :
Prop := ∀ i i', (f i * f i') ^ M i i' = 1
private theorem relations_liftable {G : Type*} [Group G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f)
(r : FreeGroup B) (hr : r ∈ M.relationsSet) : (FreeGroup.lift f) r = 1 := by
rcases hr with ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, rfl⟩
rw [uncurry, relation, map_pow, _root_.map_mul, FreeGroup.lift.of, FreeGroup.lift.of]
exact hf i i'
private def groupLift {G : Type*} [Group G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f) : W →* G :=
(PresentedGroup.toGroup (relations_liftable hf)).comp cs.mulEquiv.toMonoidHom
private def restrictUnit {G : Type*} [Monoid G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f) (i : B) :
Gˣ where
val := f i
inv := f i
val_inv := pow_one (f i * f i) ▸ M.diagonal i ▸ hf i i
inv_val := pow_one (f i * f i) ▸ M.diagonal i ▸ hf i i
private theorem toMonoidHom_apply_symm_apply (a : PresentedGroup (M.relationsSet)):
(MulEquiv.toMonoidHom cs.mulEquiv : W →* PresentedGroup (M.relationsSet))
((MulEquiv.symm cs.mulEquiv) a) = a := calc
_ = cs.mulEquiv ((MulEquiv.symm cs.mulEquiv) a) := by rfl
_ = _ := by rw [MulEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The universal mapping property of Coxeter systems. For any monoid `G`,
functions `f : B → G` whose values satisfy the Coxeter relations are equivalent to
monoid homomorphisms `f' : W → G`. -/
def lift {G : Type*} [Monoid G] : {f : B → G // IsLiftable M f} ≃ (W →* G) where
toFun f := MonoidHom.comp (Units.coeHom G) (cs.groupLift
(show ∀ i i', ((restrictUnit f.property) i * (restrictUnit f.property) i') ^ M i i' = 1 from
fun i i' ↦ Units.ext (f.property i i')))
invFun ι := ⟨ι ∘ cs.simple, fun i i' ↦ by
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, ← map_mul, ← map_pow, simple_mul_simple_pow, map_one]⟩
left_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, comp_apply, mem_setOf_eq, groupLift, simple]
rw [← MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, toMonoidHom_apply_symm_apply, PresentedGroup.toGroup.of,
OneHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe, Units.coeHom_apply, restrictUnit]
right_inv ι := by
apply cs.ext_simple
intro i
dsimp only
rw [groupLift, simple, MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, toMonoidHom_apply_symm_apply,
PresentedGroup.toGroup.of, CoxeterSystem.restrictUnit, Units.coeHom_apply]
simp only [comp_apply, simple]
@[simp]
theorem lift_apply_simple {G : Type*} [Monoid G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f) (i : B) :
cs.lift ⟨f, hf⟩ (s i) = f i := congrFun (congrArg Subtype.val (cs.lift.left_inv ⟨f, hf⟩)) i
/-- If two Coxeter systems on the same group `W` have the same Coxeter matrix `M : Matrix B B ℕ`
and the same simple reflection map `B → W`, then they are identical. -/
theorem simple_determines_coxeterSystem :
Injective (simple : CoxeterSystem M W → B → W) := by
intro cs1 cs2 h
apply CoxeterSystem.ext
apply MulEquiv.toMonoidHom_injective
apply cs1.ext_simple
intro i
nth_rw 2 [h]
simp [simple]
/-! ### Words -/
/-- The product of the simple reflections of `W` corresponding to the indices in `ω`. -/
def wordProd (ω : List B) : W := prod (map cs.simple ω)
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
@[simp] theorem wordProd_nil : π [] = 1 := by simp [wordProd]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean | 358 | 358 | theorem wordProd_cons (i : B) (ω : List B) : π (i :: ω) = s i * π ω := by | simp [wordProd]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.lpSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.l2_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
/-!
# Hilbert sum of a family of inner product spaces
Given a family `(G : ι → Type*) [Π i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (G i)]` of inner product spaces, this
file equips `lp G 2` with an inner product space structure, where `lp G 2` consists of those
dependent functions `f : Π i, G i` for which `∑' i, ‖f i‖ ^ 2`, the sum of the norms-squared, is
summable. This construction is sometimes called the *Hilbert sum* of the family `G`. By choosing
`G` to be `ι → 𝕜`, the Hilbert space `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` may be seen as a special case of this construction.
We also define a *predicate* `IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V`, where `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E`, expressing that
`V` is an `OrthogonalFamily` and that the associated map `lp G 2 →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is surjective.
## Main definitions
* `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry`: Given a Hilbert space `E`, a family `G` of inner product
spaces and a family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` of isometric embeddings of the `G i` into `E` with
mutually-orthogonal images, there is an induced isometric embedding of the Hilbert sum of `G`
into `E`.
* `IsHilbertSum`: Given a Hilbert space `E`, a family `G` of inner product
spaces and a family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` of isometric embeddings of the `G i` into `E`,
`IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V` means that `V` is an `OrthogonalFamily` and that the above
linear isometry is surjective.
* `IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv`: If a Hilbert space `E` is a Hilbert sum of the
inner product spaces `G i` with respect to the family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E`, then the
corresponding `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry` can be upgraded to a `LinearIsometryEquiv`.
* `HilbertBasis`: We define a *Hilbert basis* of a Hilbert space `E` to be a structure whose single
field `HilbertBasis.repr` is an isometric isomorphism of `E` with `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` (i.e., the Hilbert
sum of `ι` copies of `𝕜`). This parallels the definition of `Basis`, in `LinearAlgebra.Basis`,
as an isomorphism of an `R`-module with `ι →₀ R`.
* `HilbertBasis.instCoeFun`: More conventionally a Hilbert basis is thought of as a family
`ι → E` of vectors in `E` satisfying certain properties (orthonormality, completeness). We obtain
this interpretation of a Hilbert basis `b` by defining `⇑b`, of type `ι → E`, to be the image
under `b.repr` of `lp.single 2 i (1:𝕜)`. This parallels the definition `Basis.coeFun` in
`LinearAlgebra.Basis`.
* `HilbertBasis.mk`: Make a Hilbert basis of `E` from an orthonormal family `v : ι → E` of vectors
in `E` whose span is dense. This parallels the definition `Basis.mk` in `LinearAlgebra.Basis`.
* `HilbertBasis.mkOfOrthogonalEqBot`: Make a Hilbert basis of `E` from an orthonormal family
`v : ι → E` of vectors in `E` whose span has trivial orthogonal complement.
## Main results
* `lp.instInnerProductSpace`: Construction of the inner product space instance on the Hilbert sum
`lp G 2`. Note that from the file `Analysis.NormedSpace.lpSpace`, the space `lp G 2` already
held a normed space instance (`lp.normedSpace`), and if each `G i` is a Hilbert space (i.e.,
complete), then `lp G 2` was already known to be complete (`lp.completeSpace`). So the work
here is to define the inner product and show it is compatible.
* `OrthogonalFamily.range_linearIsometry`: Given a family `G` of inner product spaces and a family
`V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` of isometric embeddings of the `G i` into `E` with mutually-orthogonal
images, the image of the embedding `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry` of the Hilbert sum of `G`
into `E` is the closure of the span of the images of the `G i`.
* `HilbertBasis.repr_apply_apply`: Given a Hilbert basis `b` of `E`, the entry `b.repr x i` of
`x`'s representation in `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` is the inner product `⟪b i, x⟫`.
* `HilbertBasis.hasSum_repr`: Given a Hilbert basis `b` of `E`, a vector `x` in `E` can be
expressed as the "infinite linear combination" `∑' i, b.repr x i • b i` of the basis vectors
`b i`, with coefficients given by the entries `b.repr x i` of `x`'s representation in `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)`.
* `exists_hilbertBasis`: A Hilbert space admits a Hilbert basis.
## Keywords
Hilbert space, Hilbert sum, l2, Hilbert basis, unitary equivalence, isometric isomorphism
-/
open RCLike Submodule Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Classical ComplexConjugate Topology
noncomputable section
variable {ι 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {E : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [cplt : CompleteSpace E]
variable {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (G i)] [∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (G i)]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` is the Hilbert space of square-summable functions `ι → 𝕜`, herein implemented
as `lp (fun i : ι => 𝕜) 2`. -/
notation "ℓ²(" ι ", " 𝕜 ")" => lp (fun i : ι => 𝕜) 2
/-! ### Inner product space structure on `lp G 2` -/
namespace lp
theorem summable_inner (f g : lp G 2) : Summable fun i => ⟪f i, g i⟫ := by
-- Apply the Direct Comparison Test, comparing with ∑' i, ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖ (summable by Hölder)
refine .of_norm_bounded (fun i => ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖) (lp.summable_mul ?_ f g) ?_
· rw [Real.isConjExponent_iff]; norm_num
intro i
-- Then apply Cauchy-Schwarz pointwise
exact norm_inner_le_norm (𝕜 := 𝕜) _ _
#align lp.summable_inner lp.summable_inner
instance instInnerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (lp G 2) :=
{ lp.normedAddCommGroup (E := G) (p := 2) with
inner := fun f g => ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫
norm_sq_eq_inner := fun f => by
calc
‖f‖ ^ 2 = ‖f‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal := by norm_cast
_ = ∑' i, ‖f i‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal := lp.norm_rpow_eq_tsum ?_ f
_ = ∑' i, ‖f i‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) := by norm_cast
_ = ∑' i, re ⟪f i, f i⟫ := by
congr
funext i
rw [norm_sq_eq_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜)]
-- Porting note: `simp` couldn't do this anymore
_ = re (∑' i, ⟪f i, f i⟫) := (RCLike.reCLM.map_tsum ?_).symm
· norm_num
· exact summable_inner f f
conj_symm := fun f g => by
calc
conj _ = conj (∑' i, ⟪g i, f i⟫) := by congr
_ = ∑' i, conj ⟪g i, f i⟫ := RCLike.conjCLE.map_tsum
_ = ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫ := by simp only [inner_conj_symm]
_ = _ := by congr
add_left := fun f₁ f₂ g => by
calc
_ = ∑' i, ⟪(f₁ + f₂) i, g i⟫ := ?_
_ = ∑' i, (⟪f₁ i, g i⟫ + ⟪f₂ i, g i⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_left, Pi.add_apply, coeFn_add]
_ = (∑' i, ⟪f₁ i, g i⟫) + ∑' i, ⟪f₂ i, g i⟫ := tsum_add ?_ ?_
_ = _ := by congr
· congr
· exact summable_inner f₁ g
· exact summable_inner f₂ g
smul_left := fun f g c => by
calc
_ = ∑' i, ⟪c • f i, g i⟫ := ?_
_ = ∑' i, conj c * ⟪f i, g i⟫ := by simp only [inner_smul_left]
_ = conj c * ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫ := tsum_mul_left
_ = _ := ?_
· simp only [coeFn_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
· congr }
theorem inner_eq_tsum (f g : lp G 2) : ⟪f, g⟫ = ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫ :=
rfl
#align lp.inner_eq_tsum lp.inner_eq_tsum
theorem hasSum_inner (f g : lp G 2) : HasSum (fun i => ⟪f i, g i⟫) ⟪f, g⟫ :=
(summable_inner f g).hasSum
#align lp.has_sum_inner lp.hasSum_inner
theorem inner_single_left (i : ι) (a : G i) (f : lp G 2) : ⟪lp.single 2 i a, f⟫ = ⟪a, f i⟫ := by
refine (hasSum_inner (lp.single 2 i a) f).unique ?_
convert hasSum_ite_eq i ⟪a, f i⟫ using 1
ext j
rw [lp.single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; rfl
· simp
#align lp.inner_single_left lp.inner_single_left
theorem inner_single_right (i : ι) (a : G i) (f : lp G 2) : ⟪f, lp.single 2 i a⟫ = ⟪f i, a⟫ := by
simpa [inner_conj_symm] using congr_arg conj (@inner_single_left _ 𝕜 _ _ _ _ i a f)
#align lp.inner_single_right lp.inner_single_right
end lp
/-! ### Identification of a general Hilbert space `E` with a Hilbert sum -/
namespace OrthogonalFamily
variable {V : ∀ i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E} (hV : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V)
protected theorem summable_of_lp (f : lp G 2) : Summable fun i => V i (f i) := by
rw [hV.summable_iff_norm_sq_summable]
convert (lp.memℓp f).summable _
· norm_cast
· norm_num
#align orthogonal_family.summable_of_lp OrthogonalFamily.summable_of_lp
/-- A mutually orthogonal family of subspaces of `E` induce a linear isometry from `lp 2` of the
subspaces into `E`. -/
protected def linearIsometry : lp G 2 →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E where
toFun f := ∑' i, V i (f i)
map_add' f g := by
simp only [tsum_add (hV.summable_of_lp f) (hV.summable_of_lp g), lp.coeFn_add, Pi.add_apply,
LinearIsometry.map_add]
map_smul' c f := by
simpa only [LinearIsometry.map_smul, Pi.smul_apply, lp.coeFn_smul] using
tsum_const_smul c (hV.summable_of_lp f)
norm_map' f := by
classical
-- needed for lattice instance on `Finset ι`, for `Filter.atTop_neBot`
have H : 0 < (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal := by norm_num
suffices ‖∑' i : ι, V i (f i)‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖f‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal by
exact Real.rpow_left_injOn H.ne' (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _) this
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ (lp.hasSum_norm H f)
convert (hV.summable_of_lp f).hasSum.norm.rpow_const (Or.inr H.le) using 1
ext s
exact mod_cast (hV.norm_sum f s).symm
#align orthogonal_family.linear_isometry OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry
protected theorem linearIsometry_apply (f : lp G 2) : hV.linearIsometry f = ∑' i, V i (f i) :=
rfl
#align orthogonal_family.linear_isometry_apply OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry_apply
protected theorem hasSum_linearIsometry (f : lp G 2) :
HasSum (fun i => V i (f i)) (hV.linearIsometry f) :=
(hV.summable_of_lp f).hasSum
#align orthogonal_family.has_sum_linear_isometry OrthogonalFamily.hasSum_linearIsometry
@[simp]
protected theorem linearIsometry_apply_single {i : ι} (x : G i) :
hV.linearIsometry (lp.single 2 i x) = V i x := by
rw [hV.linearIsometry_apply, ← tsum_ite_eq i (V i x)]
congr
ext j
rw [lp.single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp [h]
#align orthogonal_family.linear_isometry_apply_single OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry_apply_single
protected theorem linearIsometry_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single (W₀ : Π₀ i : ι, G i) :
hV.linearIsometry (W₀.sum (lp.single 2)) = W₀.sum fun i => V i := by
simp
#align orthogonal_family.linear_isometry_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single
/-- The canonical linear isometry from the `lp 2` of a mutually orthogonal family of subspaces of
`E` into E, has range the closure of the span of the subspaces. -/
protected theorem range_linearIsometry [∀ i, CompleteSpace (G i)] :
LinearMap.range hV.linearIsometry.toLinearMap =
(⨆ i, LinearMap.range (V i).toLinearMap).topologicalClosure := by
-- Porting note: dot notation broken
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨f, rfl⟩
refine mem_closure_of_tendsto (hV.hasSum_linearIsometry f) (eventually_of_forall ?_)
intro s
rw [SetLike.mem_coe]
refine sum_mem ?_
intro i _
refine mem_iSup_of_mem i ?_
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self _ (f i)
· apply topologicalClosure_minimal
· refine iSup_le ?_
rintro i x ⟨x, rfl⟩
use lp.single 2 i x
exact hV.linearIsometry_apply_single x
exact hV.linearIsometry.isometry.uniformInducing.isComplete_range.isClosed
#align orthogonal_family.range_linear_isometry OrthogonalFamily.range_linearIsometry
end OrthogonalFamily
section IsHilbertSum
variable (𝕜 G)
variable (V : ∀ i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (F : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E)
/-- Given a family of Hilbert spaces `G : ι → Type*`, a Hilbert sum of `G` consists of a Hilbert
space `E` and an orthogonal family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` such that the induced isometry
`Φ : lp G 2 → E` is surjective.
Keeping in mind that `lp G 2` is "the" external Hilbert sum of `G : ι → Type*`, this is analogous
to `DirectSum.IsInternal`, except that we don't express it in terms of actual submodules. -/
structure IsHilbertSum : Prop where
ofSurjective ::
/-- The orthogonal family constituting the summands in the Hilbert sum. -/
protected OrthogonalFamily : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V
/-- The isometry `lp G 2 → E` induced by the orthogonal family is surjective. -/
protected surjective_isometry : Function.Surjective OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry
#align is_hilbert_sum IsHilbertSum
variable {𝕜 G V}
/-- If `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is an orthogonal family such that the supremum of the ranges of
`V i` is dense, then `(E, V)` is a Hilbert sum of `G`. -/
theorem IsHilbertSum.mk [∀ i, CompleteSpace <| G i] (hVortho : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V)
(hVtotal : ⊤ ≤ (⨆ i, LinearMap.range (V i).toLinearMap).topologicalClosure) :
IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V :=
{ OrthogonalFamily := hVortho
surjective_isometry := by
rw [← LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap]
exact LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp
(eq_top_iff.mpr <| hVtotal.trans_eq hVortho.range_linearIsometry.symm) }
#align is_hilbert_sum.mk IsHilbertSum.mk
/-- This is `Orthonormal.isHilbertSum` in the case of actual inclusions from subspaces. -/
theorem IsHilbertSum.mkInternal [∀ i, CompleteSpace <| F i]
(hFortho : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun i => F i) fun i => (F i).subtypeₗᵢ)
(hFtotal : ⊤ ≤ (⨆ i, F i).topologicalClosure) :
IsHilbertSum 𝕜 (fun i => F i) fun i => (F i).subtypeₗᵢ :=
IsHilbertSum.mk hFortho (by simpa [subtypeₗᵢ_toLinearMap, range_subtype] using hFtotal)
#align is_hilbert_sum.mk_internal IsHilbertSum.mkInternal
/-- *A* Hilbert sum `(E, V)` of `G` is canonically isomorphic to *the* Hilbert sum of `G`,
i.e `lp G 2`.
Note that this goes in the opposite direction from `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry`. -/
noncomputable def IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv (hV : IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V) : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] lp G 2 :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.symm <|
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofSurjective hV.OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry hV.surjective_isometry
#align is_hilbert_sum.linear_isometry_equiv IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv
/-- In the canonical isometric isomorphism between a Hilbert sum `E` of `G` and `lp G 2`,
a vector `w : lp G 2` is the image of the infinite sum of the associated elements in `E`. -/
protected theorem IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply (hV : IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V)
(w : lp G 2) : hV.linearIsometryEquiv.symm w = ∑' i, V i (w i) := by
simp [IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv, OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry_apply]
#align is_hilbert_sum.linear_isometry_equiv_symm_apply IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply
/-- In the canonical isometric isomorphism between a Hilbert sum `E` of `G` and `lp G 2`,
a vector `w : lp G 2` is the image of the infinite sum of the associated elements in `E`, and this
sum indeed converges. -/
protected theorem IsHilbertSum.hasSum_linearIsometryEquiv_symm (hV : IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V)
(w : lp G 2) : HasSum (fun i => V i (w i)) (hV.linearIsometryEquiv.symm w) := by
simp [IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv, OrthogonalFamily.hasSum_linearIsometry]
#align is_hilbert_sum.has_sum_linear_isometry_equiv_symm IsHilbertSum.hasSum_linearIsometryEquiv_symm
/-- In the canonical isometric isomorphism between a Hilbert sum `E` of `G : ι → Type*` and
`lp G 2`, an "elementary basis vector" in `lp G 2` supported at `i : ι` is the image of the
associated element in `E`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply_single (hV : IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V)
{i : ι} (x : G i) : hV.linearIsometryEquiv.symm (lp.single 2 i x) = V i x := by
simp [IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv, OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry_apply_single]
#align is_hilbert_sum.linear_isometry_equiv_symm_apply_single IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply_single
/-- In the canonical isometric isomorphism between a Hilbert sum `E` of `G : ι → Type*` and
`lp G 2`, a finitely-supported vector in `lp G 2` is the image of the associated finite sum of
elements of `E`. -/
protected theorem IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single
(hV : IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V) (W₀ : Π₀ i : ι, G i) :
hV.linearIsometryEquiv.symm (W₀.sum (lp.single 2)) = W₀.sum fun i => V i := by
simp only [map_dfinsupp_sum, IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply_single]
#align is_hilbert_sum.linear_isometry_equiv_symm_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single
/-- In the canonical isometric isomorphism between a Hilbert sum `E` of `G : ι → Type*` and
`lp G 2`, a finitely-supported vector in `lp G 2` is the image of the associated finite sum of
elements of `E`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single
(hV : IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V) (W₀ : Π₀ i : ι, G i) :
((W₀.sum (γ := lp G 2) fun a b ↦ hV.linearIsometryEquiv (V a b)) : ∀ i, G i) = W₀ := by
rw [← map_dfinsupp_sum]
rw [← hV.linearIsometryEquiv_symm_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single]
rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
ext i
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [DFinsupp.sum, lp.single_apply]
#align is_hilbert_sum.linear_isometry_equiv_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single
/-- Given a total orthonormal family `v : ι → E`, `E` is a Hilbert sum of `fun i : ι => 𝕜`
relative to the family of linear isometries `fun i k => k • v i`. -/
theorem Orthonormal.isHilbertSum {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(hsp : ⊤ ≤ (span 𝕜 (Set.range v)).topologicalClosure) :
IsHilbertSum 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => 𝕜) fun i => LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton 𝕜 E (hv.1 i) :=
IsHilbertSum.mk hv.orthogonalFamily (by
convert hsp
simp [← LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range, ← Submodule.span_iUnion])
#align orthonormal.is_hilbert_sum Orthonormal.isHilbertSum
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/l2Space.lean | 374 | 383 | theorem Submodule.isHilbertSumOrthogonal (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) [hK : CompleteSpace K] :
IsHilbertSum 𝕜 (fun b => ↥(cond b K Kᗮ)) fun b => (cond b K Kᗮ).subtypeₗᵢ := by |
have : ∀ b, CompleteSpace (↥(cond b K Kᗮ)) := by
intro b
cases b <;> first | exact instOrthogonalCompleteSpace K | assumption
refine IsHilbertSum.mkInternal _ K.orthogonalFamily_self ?_
refine le_trans ?_ (Submodule.le_topologicalClosure _)
rw [iSup_bool_eq, cond, cond]
refine Codisjoint.top_le ?_
exact Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace.codisjoint
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.NormalClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.SeparableDegree
/-!
# Separable degree
This file contains basics about the separable degree of a field extension.
## Main definitions
- `Field.Emb F E`: the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`
(the algebraic closure of `F` is usually used in the literature, but our definition has the
advantage that `Field.Emb F E` lies in the same universe as `E` rather than the maximum over `F`
and `E`). Usually denoted by $\operatorname{Emb}_F(E)$ in textbooks.
**Remark:** if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense,
and if it is infinite, then its cardinality doesn't behave as expected (namely, not equal to the
field extension degree of `separableClosure F E / F`). For example, if $F = \mathbb{Q}$ and
$E = \mathbb{Q}( \mu_{p^\infty} )$, then $\operatorname{Emb}_F (E)$ is in bijection with
$\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$, which is isomorphic to
$\mathbb{Z}_p^\times$, which is uncountable, while $[E:F]$ is countable.
**TODO:** prove or disprove that if `E / F` is algebraic and `Emb F E` is infinite, then
`Field.Emb F E` has cardinality `2 ^ Module.rank F (separableClosure F E)`.
- `Field.finSepDegree F E`: the (finite) separable degree $[E:F]_s$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic
closure of `E`, as a natural number. It is zero if `Field.Emb F E` is not finite.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense.
**Remark:** the `Cardinal`-valued, potentially infinite separable degree `Field.sepDegree F E`
for a general algebraic extension `E / F` is defined to be the degree of `L / F`, where `L` is
the (relative) separable closure `separableClosure F E` of `F` in `E`, which is not defined in
this file yet. Later we will show that (`Field.finSepDegree_eq`), if `Field.Emb F E` is finite,
then these two definitions coincide.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
## Main results
- `Field.embEquivOfEquiv`, `Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv`:
a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. In particular, they have the same cardinality (so their
`Field.finSepDegree` are equal).
- `Field.embEquivOfAdjoinSplits`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F`
and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embEquivOfIsAlgClosed`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed.
In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic`, `Field.finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic`:
if `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection `Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`.
In particular, the separable degrees satisfy the tower law: $[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$
(see also `FiniteDimensional.finrank_mul_finrank`).
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_le_natDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than
its degree.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff`: the separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is
equal to its degree if and only if it is separable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_splits`: if a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree
is equal to the number of distinct roots of it over `E`.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: the separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_expand`: if a field `F` is of exponential characteristic
`q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f` and `f` have the same separable degree.
- `Polynomial.HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq`: if a polynomial has separable
contraction, then its separable degree is equal to its separable contraction degree.
- `Irreducible.natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree`: the separable degree of an irreducible
polynomial divides its degree.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree`: the separable degree of
`F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the separable degree of the minimal polynomial of `α` over `F`.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff`: if `α` is algebraic over `F`, then
the separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if and only if `α` is a
separable element.
- `Field.finSepDegree_dvd_finrank`: the separable degree of any field extension `E / F` divides
the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_le_finrank`: the separable degree of a finite extension `E / F` is smaller
than the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_eq_finrank_iff`: if `E / F` is a finite extension, then its separable degree
is equal to its degree if and only if it is a separable extension.
- `IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_simple_iff_separable`: `F⟮x⟯ / F` is a separable extension
if and only if `x` is a separable element.
- `IsSeparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both separable, then `K / F` is also separable.
## Tags
separable degree, degree, polynomial
-/
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable (F : Type u) (E : Type v) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
variable (K : Type w) [Field K] [Algebra F K]
namespace Field
/-- `Field.Emb F E` is the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure
of `E`. -/
def Emb := E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure E
/-- If `E / F` is an algebraic extension, then the (finite) separable degree of `E / F`
is the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`,
as a natural number. It is defined to be zero if there are infinitely many of them.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense. -/
def finSepDegree : ℕ := Nat.card (Emb F E)
instance instInhabitedEmb : Inhabited (Emb F E) := ⟨IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E _⟩
instance instNeZeroFinSepDegree [FiniteDimensional F E] : NeZero (finSepDegree F E) :=
⟨Nat.card_ne_zero.2 ⟨inferInstance, Fintype.finite <| minpoly.AlgHom.fintype _ _ _⟩⟩
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. -/
def embEquivOfEquiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
Emb F E ≃ Emb F K := AlgEquiv.arrowCongr i <| AlgEquiv.symm <| by
let _ : Algebra E K := i.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K := by
constructor
intro x
have h := isAlgebraic_algebraMap (R := E) (A := K) (i.symm.toAlgHom x)
rw [show ∀ y : E, (algebraMap E K) y = i.toAlgHom y from fun y ↦ rfl] at h
simpa only [AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using h
apply AlgEquiv.restrictScalars (R := F) (S := E)
exact IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K) (AlgebraicClosure E)
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same `Field.finSepDegree`
over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
finSepDegree F E = finSepDegree F K := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfEquiv F E K i)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_self : finSepDegree F F = 1 := by
have : Cardinal.mk (Emb F F) = 1 := le_antisymm
(Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton.2 AlgHom.subsingleton)
(Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _)
rw [finSepDegree, Nat.card, this, Cardinal.one_toNat]
end Field
namespace IntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = 1 := by
rw [finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ (botEquiv F E), finSepDegree_self]
section Tower
variable {F}
variable [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot' : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F E :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((botEquiv E K).restrictScalars F)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_top : finSepDegree F (⊤ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F K :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((topEquiv (F := E) (E := K)).restrictScalars F)
end Tower
end IntermediateField
namespace Field
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every
element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`.
Combined with `Field.instInhabitedEmb`, it can be viewed as a stronger version of
`IntermediateField.nonempty_algHom_of_adjoin_splits`. -/
def embEquivOfAdjoinSplits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
(hS ▸ isAlgebraic_adjoin (S := S) fun x hx ↦ (hK x hx).1)
have halg := (topEquiv (F := F) (E := E)).isAlgebraic
Classical.choice <| Function.Embedding.antisymm
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ splits_of_mem_adjoin F (S := S) hK (hS ▸ mem_top)) _)
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) _)
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K`
if `E = F(S)` such that every element
`s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K hS hK)
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic
and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
def embEquivOfIsAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K (adjoin_univ F E) fun s _ ↦
⟨Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral s, IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _⟩
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K` as a natural number,
when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfIsAlgClosed F E K)
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection
`Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`. A corollary of `algHomEquivSigma`. -/
def embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
Emb F E × Emb E K ≃ Emb F K :=
let e : ∀ f : E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure K,
@AlgHom E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra ≃ Emb E K := fun f ↦
(@embEquivOfIsAlgClosed E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra).symm
(algHomEquivSigma (A := F) (B := E) (C := K) (D := AlgebraicClosure K) |>.trans
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProdOfEquiv e) |>.trans <| Equiv.prodCongrLeft <|
fun _ : Emb E K ↦ AlgEquiv.arrowCongr (@AlgEquiv.refl F E _ _ _) <|
(IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K)
(AlgebraicClosure E)).restrictScalars F).symm
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic, then their
separable degrees satisfy the tower law
$[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$. See also `FiniteDimensional.finrank_mul_finrank`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic
[Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
finSepDegree F E * finSepDegree E K = finSepDegree F K := by
simpa only [Nat.card_prod] using Nat.card_congr (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F E K)
end Field
namespace Polynomial
variable {F E}
variable (f : F[X])
/-- The separable degree `Polynomial.natSepDegree` of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
This is similar to `Polynomial.natDegree` but not to `Polynomial.degree`, namely, the separable
degree of `0` is `0`, not negative infinity. -/
def natSepDegree : ℕ := (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset.card
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_le_natDegree : f.natSepDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
have := f.map (algebraMap F f.SplittingField) |>.card_roots'
rw [← aroots_def, natDegree_map] at this
exact (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset_card_le.trans this
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C (x : F) : (X - C x).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X_sub_C, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X : (X : F[X]).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
/-- A constant polynomial has zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero (h : f.natDegree = 0) : f.natSepDegree = 0 := by
linarith only [natSepDegree_le_natDegree f, h]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C (x : F) : (C x).natSepDegree = 0 := natSepDegree_eq_zero _ (natDegree_C _)
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_zero : (0 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, natSepDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_one : (1 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_1, natSepDegree_C]
/-- A non-constant polynomial has non-zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero (h : f.natDegree ≠ 0) : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 := by
rw [natSepDegree, ne_eq, Finset.card_eq_zero, ← ne_eq, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
use rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
exact ⟨ne_of_apply_ne _ h, map_rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)⟩
/-- A polynomial has zero separable degree if and only if it is constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree = 0 ↔ f.natDegree = 0 :=
⟨(natSepDegree_ne_zero f).mtr, natSepDegree_eq_zero f⟩
/-- A polynomial has non-zero separable degree if and only if it is non-constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 ↔ f.natDegree ≠ 0 :=
Iff.not <| natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff f
/-- The separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is equal to its degree if and only if
it is separable. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff (hf : f ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree ↔ f.Separable := by
simp_rw [← card_rootSet_eq_natDegree_iff_of_splits hf (SplittingField.splits f),
rootSet_def, Finset.coe_sort_coe, Fintype.card_coe]
rfl
/-- If a polynomial is separable, then its separable degree is equal to its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := (natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff f h.ne_zero).2 h
variable {f} in
/-- Same as `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable`, but enables the use of
dot notation. -/
theorem Separable.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable f h
/-- If a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over `E`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_splits (h : f.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card := by
rw [aroots, ← (SplittingField.lift f h).comp_algebraMap, ← map_map,
roots_map _ ((splits_id_iff_splits _).mpr <| SplittingField.splits f),
Multiset.toFinset_map, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ (RingHom.injective _), natSepDegree]
variable (E) in
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [IsAlgClosed E] :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card :=
natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f (IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain f)
variable (E) in
theorem natSepDegree_map : (f.map (algebraMap F E)).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure E), aroots_def, map_map,
← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_C_mul _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_smul_nonzero {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(x • f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_smul_nonzero _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_pow {n : ℕ} : (f ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else f.natSepDegree := by
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_pow]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simp only [h, zero_smul, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.card_empty, ite_true]
simp only [h, Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ n h, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(f ^ n).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by simp_rw [natSepDegree_pow, hn, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n : F[X]).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow {x : F} {n : ℕ} :
((X - C x) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul_X_sub_C_pow {x y : F} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * (X - C y) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_C_mul _ hx, natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow]
theorem natSepDegree_mul (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree ≤ f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· simp only [h, natSepDegree_zero, zero_le]
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add]
exact Finset.card_union_le _ _
theorem natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree ↔ (f = 0 ∧ g = 0) ∨ IsCoprime f g := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· rw [mul_eq_zero] at h
wlog hf : f = 0 generalizing f g
· simpa only [mul_comm, add_comm, and_comm,
isCoprime_comm] using this g f h.symm (h.resolve_left hf)
rw [hf, zero_mul, natSepDegree_zero, zero_add, isCoprime_zero_left, isUnit_iff, eq_comm,
natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff, natDegree_eq_zero]
refine ⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0
· exact .inl ⟨rfl, by rw [← h, hx, map_zero]⟩
exact .inr ⟨x, Ne.isUnit hx, h⟩
rintro (⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨x, -, h⟩)
· exact ⟨0, by rw [h, map_zero]⟩
exact ⟨x, h⟩
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add,
Finset.card_union_eq_card_add_card, Finset.disjoint_iff_ne, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
refine ⟨fun H ↦ .inr (isCoprime_of_irreducible_dvd (not_and.2 fun _ ↦ h.2)
fun u hu ⟨v, hf⟩ ⟨w, hg⟩ ↦ ?_), ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsAlgClosed.exists_aeval_eq_zero
(AlgebraicClosure F) _ (degree_pos_of_irreducible hu).ne'
exact H x ⟨h.1, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hf)⟩
x ⟨h.2, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hg)⟩ rfl
rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | hc)
· exact (h.1 rfl).elim
rintro x hf _ hg rfl
obtain ⟨u, v, hfg⟩ := hc
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, map_one, hf.2, hg.2, mul_zero, add_zero,
zero_ne_one] using congr(aeval x $hfg)
theorem natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime (g : F[X]) (hc : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree :=
(natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff f g).2 (.inr hc)
theorem natSepDegree_le_of_dvd (g : F[X]) (h1 : f ∣ g) (h2 : g ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree ≤ g.natSepDegree := by
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F)]
exact Finset.card_le_card <| Multiset.toFinset_subset.mpr <|
Multiset.Le.subset <| roots.le_of_dvd (map_ne_zero h2) <| map_dvd _ h1
/-- If a field `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f`
and `f` have the same separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_expand (q : ℕ) [hF : ExpChar F q] {n : ℕ} :
(expand F (q ^ n) f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
cases' hF with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [one_pow, expand_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime
simpa only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_def, map_expand,
Fintype.card_coe] using Fintype.card_eq.2
⟨(f.map (algebraMap F (AlgebraicClosure F))).rootsExpandPowEquivRoots q n⟩
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (n : ℕ) (y : F) :
(X ^ q ^ n - C y).natSepDegree = 1 := by
rw [← expand_X, ← expand_C (q ^ n), ← map_sub, natSepDegree_expand, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
variable {f} in
/-- If `g` is a separable contraction of `f`, then the separable degree of `f` is equal to
the degree of `g`. -/
theorem IsSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq {g : Polynomial F} {q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q]
(h : IsSeparableContraction q f g) : f.natSepDegree = g.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨h1, m, h2⟩ := h
rw [← h2, natSepDegree_expand, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree]
variable {f} in
/-- If a polynomial has separable contraction, then its separable degree is equal to the degree of
the given separable contraction. -/
theorem HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
{q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q] (hf : f.HasSeparableContraction q) :
f.natSepDegree = hf.degree := hf.isSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
end Polynomial
namespace Irreducible
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
/-- The separable degree of an irreducible polynomial divides its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree (h : Irreducible f) :
f.natSepDegree ∣ f.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨q, _⟩ := ExpChar.exists F
have hf := h.hasSeparableContraction q
rw [hf.natSepDegree_eq]
exact hf.dvd_degree
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y)`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨g, h1, n, rfl⟩ := hi.hasSeparableContraction q
have h2 : g.natDegree = 1 := by
rwa [natSepDegree_expand _ q, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree] at h
rw [((monic_expand_iff <| expChar_pow_pos F q n).mp hm).eq_X_add_C h2]
exact ⟨n, -(g.coeff 0), by rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
rw [h, natSepDegree_expand _ q, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
simp_rw [hi.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' q hm, map_sub, expand_X, expand_C]
end Irreducible
namespace Polynomial
namespace Monic
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible' := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic'
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic
/-- If a monic polynomial of separable degree one splits, then it is of form `(X - C y) ^ m` for
some non-zero natural number `m` and some element `y` of `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_splits (hm : f.Monic)
(hs : f.Splits (RingHom.id F))
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m : ℕ) (y : F), m ≠ 0 ∧ f = (X - C y) ^ m := by
have h1 := eq_prod_roots_of_monic_of_splits_id hm hs
have h2 := (natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f hs).symm
rw [h, aroots_def, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id, Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_one_iff] at h2
obtain ⟨h2, y, h3⟩ := h2
exact ⟨_, y, h2, by rwa [h3, Multiset.map_nsmul, Multiset.map_singleton, Multiset.prod_nsmul,
Multiset.prod_singleton] at h1⟩
/-- If a monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one, then it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y` for some natural number `n`,
and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no `q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_irreducible (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q]
(hm : f.Monic) (hi : Irreducible f) (h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F),
(n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
obtain ⟨n, y, hf⟩ := (hm.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible q hi).1 h
cases id ‹ExpChar F q› with
| zero =>
simp_rw [one_pow, pow_one] at hf ⊢
exact ⟨0, y, .inl rfl, hf⟩
| prime hq =>
refine ⟨n, y, (em _).imp id fun hn ⟨z, hy⟩ ↦ ?_, hf⟩
haveI := expChar_of_injective_ringHom (R := F) C_injective q
rw [hf, ← Nat.succ_pred hn, pow_succ, pow_mul, ← hy, frobenius_def, map_pow,
← sub_pow_expChar] at hi
exact not_irreducible_pow hq.ne_one hi
/-- If a monic polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has separable degree
one, then it is of the form `(X ^ (q ^ n) - C y) ^ m` for some non-zero natural number `m`,
some natural number `n`, and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no
`q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m n : ℕ) (y : F),
m ≠ 0 ∧ (n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = (X ^ q ^ n - C y) ^ m := by
obtain ⟨p, hM, hI, hf⟩ := exists_monic_irreducible_factor _ <| not_isUnit_of_natDegree_pos _
<| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| (natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff _).1 (h.symm ▸ Nat.one_ne_zero)
have hD := (h ▸ natSepDegree_le_of_dvd p f hf hm.ne_zero).antisymm <|
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| (natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff _).2 hI.natDegree_pos.ne'
obtain ⟨n, y, H, hp⟩ := hM.eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_irreducible q hI hD
have hF := multiplicity_finite_of_degree_pos_of_monic (degree_pos_of_irreducible hI) hM hm.ne_zero
have hne := (multiplicity.pos_of_dvd hF hf).ne'
refine ⟨_, n, y, hne, H, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, hf, H⟩ := multiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hF
rw [hf, natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime _ c <| IsCoprime.pow_left <|
(hI.coprime_or_dvd c).resolve_right H, natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero _ hne, hD,
add_right_eq_self, natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff] at h
simpa only [eq_one_of_monic_natDegree_zero ((hM.pow _).of_mul_monic_left (hf ▸ hm)) h,
mul_one, ← hp] using hf
/-- A monic polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has separable degree one
if and only if it is of the form `(X ^ (q ^ n) - C y) ^ m` for some non-zero natural number `m`,
some natural number `n`, and some element `y` of `F`. -/
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SeparableDegree.lean | 565 | 570 | theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic) :
f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ (m n : ℕ) (y : F), m ≠ 0 ∧ f = (X ^ q ^ n - C y) ^ m := by |
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨m, n, y, hm, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨m, n, y, hm, -, h⟩ := hm.eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one q h
exact ⟨m, n, y, hm, h⟩
simp_rw [h, natSepDegree_pow, hm, ite_false, natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Basic
#align_import analysis.box_integral.partition.split from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
/-!
# Split a box along one or more hyperplanes
## Main definitions
A hyperplane `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` splits a rectangular box `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` into two
smaller boxes. If `a ∉ Ioo (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, then one of these boxes is empty, so it is not a
box in the sense of `BoxIntegral.Box`.
We introduce the following definitions.
* `BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower I i a` and `BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper I i a` are these boxes (as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`);
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.split I i a` is the partition of `I` made of these two boxes (or of one
box `I` if one of these boxes is empty);
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany I s`, where `s : Finset (ι × ℝ)` is a finite set of
hyperplanes `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` encoded as pairs `(i, a)`, is the partition of `I` made by
cutting it along all the hyperplanes in `s`.
## Main results
The main result `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.exists_iUnion_eq_diff` says that any prepartition `π` of
`I` admits a prepartition `π'` of `I` that covers exactly `I \ π.iUnion`. One of these prepartitions
is available as `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.compl`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition, hyperplane
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Filter
open Function Set Filter
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι M : Type*} {n : ℕ}
namespace Box
variable {I : Box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ} {y : ι → ℝ}
/-- Given a box `I` and `x ∈ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, the hyperplane `{y : ι → ℝ | y i = x}` splits
`I` into two boxes. `BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower I i x` is the box `I ∩ {y | y i ≤ x}`
(if it is nonempty). As usual, we represent a box that may be empty as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`. -/
def splitLower (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' I.lower (update I.upper i (min x (I.upper i)))
#align box_integral.box.split_lower BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitLower : (splitLower I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } := by
rw [splitLower, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and, ← Pi.le_def,
le_update_iff, le_min_iff, and_assoc, and_forall_ne (p := fun j => y j ≤ upper I j) i, mem_def]
rw [and_comm (a := y i ≤ x)]
#align box_integral.box.coe_split_lower BoxIntegral.Box.coe_splitLower
theorem splitLower_le : I.splitLower i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_le BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_le
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitLower i x = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
rw [splitLower, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.upper fun j y => y ≤ I.lower j]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_eq_bot BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_self : I.splitLower i x = I ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
simp [splitLower, update_eq_iff]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_eq_self BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_eq_self
theorem splitLower_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, I.lower j < update I.upper i x j :=
(forall_update_iff I.upper fun j y => I.lower j < y).2
⟨h.1, fun j _ => I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.splitLower i x = (⟨I.lower, update I.upper i x, h'⟩ : Box ι) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [splitLower, mk'_eq_coe, min_eq_left h.2.le,
update, and_self]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_def BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_def
/-- Given a box `I` and `x ∈ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, the hyperplane `{y : ι → ℝ | y i = x}` splits
`I` into two boxes. `BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper I i x` is the box `I ∩ {y | x < y i}`
(if it is nonempty). As usual, we represent a box that may be empty as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`. -/
def splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' (update I.lower i (max x (I.lower i))) I.upper
#align box_integral.box.split_upper BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitUpper : (splitUpper I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by
rw [splitUpper, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and,
forall_update_iff I.lower fun j z => z < y j, max_lt_iff, and_assoc (a := x < y i),
and_forall_ne (p := fun j => lower I j < y j) i, mem_def]
exact and_comm
#align box_integral.box.coe_split_upper BoxIntegral.Box.coe_splitUpper
theorem splitUpper_le : I.splitUpper i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_le BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_le
@[simp]
theorem splitUpper_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitUpper i x = ⊥ ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
rw [splitUpper, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.lower fun j y => I.upper j ≤ y]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_eq_bot BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem splitUpper_eq_self : I.splitUpper i x = I ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
simp [splitUpper, update_eq_iff]
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_eq_self BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_eq_self
theorem splitUpper_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, update I.lower i x j < I.upper j :=
(forall_update_iff I.lower fun j y => y < I.upper j).2
⟨h.2, fun j _ => I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.splitUpper i x = (⟨update I.lower i x, I.upper, h'⟩ : Box ι) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [splitUpper, mk'_eq_coe, max_eq_left h.1.le,
update, and_self]
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_def BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_def
theorem disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
Disjoint (I.splitLower i x) (I.splitUpper i x) := by
rw [← disjoint_withBotCoe, coe_splitLower, coe_splitUpper]
refine (Disjoint.inf_left' _ ?_).inf_right' _
rw [Set.disjoint_left]
exact fun y (hle : y i ≤ x) hlt => not_lt_of_le hle hlt
#align box_integral.box.disjoint_split_lower_split_upper BoxIntegral.Box.disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper
theorem splitLower_ne_splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
I.splitLower i x ≠ I.splitUpper i x := by
cases' le_or_lt x (I.lower i) with h
· rw [splitUpper_eq_self.2 h, splitLower_eq_bot.2 h]
exact WithBot.bot_ne_coe
· refine (disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper I i x).ne ?_
rwa [Ne, splitLower_eq_bot, not_le]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_ne_split_upper BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_ne_splitUpper
end Box
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J : Box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ}
/-- The partition of `I : Box ι` into the boxes `I ∩ {y | y ≤ x i}` and `I ∩ {y | x i < y}`.
One of these boxes can be empty, then this partition is just the single-box partition `⊤`. -/
def split (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : Prepartition I :=
ofWithBot {I.splitLower i x, I.splitUpper i x}
(by
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
rintro J (rfl | rfl)
exacts [Box.splitLower_le, Box.splitUpper_le])
(by
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Finset.coe_singleton, true_and_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
pairwise_insert_of_symmetric symmetric_disjoint, pairwise_singleton]
rintro J rfl -
exact I.disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper i x)
#align box_integral.prepartition.split BoxIntegral.Prepartition.split
@[simp]
theorem mem_split_iff : J ∈ split I i x ↔ ↑J = I.splitLower i x ∨ ↑J = I.splitUpper i x := by
simp [split]
#align box_integral.prepartition.mem_split_iff BoxIntegral.Prepartition.mem_split_iff
theorem mem_split_iff' : J ∈ split I i x ↔
(J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } ∨ (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by
simp [mem_split_iff, ← Box.withBotCoe_inj]
#align box_integral.prepartition.mem_split_iff' BoxIntegral.Prepartition.mem_split_iff'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_split (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : (split I i x).iUnion = I := by
simp [split, ← inter_union_distrib_left, ← setOf_or, le_or_lt]
#align box_integral.prepartition.Union_split BoxIntegral.Prepartition.iUnion_split
theorem isPartitionSplit (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : IsPartition (split I i x) :=
isPartition_iff_iUnion_eq.2 <| iUnion_split I i x
#align box_integral.prepartition.is_partition_split BoxIntegral.Prepartition.isPartitionSplit
-- Porting note: In the type, changed `Option.elim` to `Option.elim'`
theorem sum_split_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ (split I i x).boxes, f J) =
(I.splitLower i x).elim' 0 f + (I.splitUpper i x).elim' 0 f := by
rw [split, sum_ofWithBot, Finset.sum_pair (I.splitLower_ne_splitUpper i x)]
#align box_integral.prepartition.sum_split_boxes BoxIntegral.Prepartition.sum_split_boxes
/-- If `x ∉ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, then the hyperplane `{y | y i = x}` does not split `I`. -/
theorem split_of_not_mem_Ioo (h : x ∉ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) : split I i x = ⊤ := by
refine ((isPartitionTop I).eq_of_boxes_subset fun J hJ => ?_).symm
rcases mem_top.1 hJ with rfl; clear hJ
rw [mem_boxes, mem_split_iff]
rw [mem_Ioo, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
cases h <;> [right; left]
· rwa [eq_comm, Box.splitUpper_eq_self]
· rwa [eq_comm, Box.splitLower_eq_self]
#align box_integral.prepartition.split_of_not_mem_Ioo BoxIntegral.Prepartition.split_of_not_mem_Ioo
theorem coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_mem_le {y : ι → ℝ} (h₁ : J ∈ split I i x) (h₂ : y ∈ J)
(h₃ : y i ≤ x) : (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } := by
refine (mem_split_iff'.1 h₁).resolve_right fun H => ?_
rw [← Box.mem_coe, H] at h₂
exact h₃.not_lt h₂.2
#align box_integral.prepartition.coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_mem_le BoxIntegral.Prepartition.coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_mem_le
theorem coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_lt_mem {y : ι → ℝ} (h₁ : J ∈ split I i x) (h₂ : y ∈ J)
(h₃ : x < y i) : (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by
refine (mem_split_iff'.1 h₁).resolve_left fun H => ?_
rw [← Box.mem_coe, H] at h₂
exact h₃.not_le h₂.2
#align box_integral.prepartition.coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_lt_mem BoxIntegral.Prepartition.coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_lt_mem
@[simp]
theorem restrict_split (h : I ≤ J) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : (split J i x).restrict I = split I i x := by
refine ((isPartitionSplit J i x).restrict h).eq_of_boxes_subset ?_
simp only [Finset.subset_iff, mem_boxes, mem_restrict', exists_prop, mem_split_iff']
have : ∀ s, (I ∩ s : Set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J := fun s => inter_subset_left.trans h
rintro J₁ ⟨J₂, H₂ | H₂, H₁⟩ <;> [left; right] <;>
simp [H₁, H₂, inter_left_comm (I : Set (ι → ℝ)), this]
#align box_integral.prepartition.restrict_split BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict_split
theorem inf_split (π : Prepartition I) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
π ⊓ split I i x = π.biUnion fun J => split J i x :=
biUnion_congr_of_le rfl fun _ hJ => restrict_split hJ i x
#align box_integral.prepartition.inf_split BoxIntegral.Prepartition.inf_split
/-- Split a box along many hyperplanes `{y | y i = x}`; each hyperplane is given by the pair
`(i x)`. -/
def splitMany (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) : Prepartition I :=
s.inf fun p => split I p.1 p.2
#align box_integral.prepartition.split_many BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany
@[simp]
theorem splitMany_empty (I : Box ι) : splitMany I ∅ = ⊤ :=
Finset.inf_empty
#align box_integral.prepartition.split_many_empty BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany_empty
@[simp]
theorem splitMany_insert (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) (p : ι × ℝ) :
splitMany I (insert p s) = splitMany I s ⊓ split I p.1 p.2 := by
rw [splitMany, Finset.inf_insert, inf_comm, splitMany]
#align box_integral.prepartition.split_many_insert BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany_insert
theorem splitMany_le_split (I : Box ι) {s : Finset (ι × ℝ)} {p : ι × ℝ} (hp : p ∈ s) :
splitMany I s ≤ split I p.1 p.2 :=
Finset.inf_le hp
#align box_integral.prepartition.split_many_le_split BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany_le_split
theorem isPartition_splitMany (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) : IsPartition (splitMany I s) :=
Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [splitMany_empty, isPartitionTop]) fun a s _ hs => by
simpa only [splitMany_insert, inf_split] using hs.biUnion fun J _ => isPartitionSplit _ _ _
#align box_integral.prepartition.is_partition_split_many BoxIntegral.Prepartition.isPartition_splitMany
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_splitMany (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) : (splitMany I s).iUnion = I :=
(isPartition_splitMany I s).iUnion_eq
#align box_integral.prepartition.Union_split_many BoxIntegral.Prepartition.iUnion_splitMany
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Split.lean | 274 | 278 | theorem inf_splitMany {I : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) :
π ⊓ splitMany I s = π.biUnion fun J => splitMany J s := by |
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with p s _ ihp
· simp
· simp_rw [splitMany_insert, ← inf_assoc, ihp, inf_split, biUnion_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monomial
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.WithBot
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.definitions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"808ea4ebfabeb599f21ec4ae87d6dc969597887f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The definitions include
`degree`, `Monic`, `leadingCoeff`
Results include
- `degree_mul` : The degree of the product is the sum of degrees
- `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq` and `leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt` :
The leading_coefficient of a sum is determined by the leading coefficients and degrees
-/
-- Porting note: `Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop` should be imported for `Nat.cast_withBot`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
#align polynomial.degree Polynomial.degree
theorem supDegree_eq_degree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree WithBot.some = p.degree :=
max_eq_sup_coe
theorem degree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => degree p < degree q :=
InvImage.wf degree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.degree_lt_wf Polynomial.degree_lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation R[X] :=
⟨_, degree_lt_wf⟩
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbot' 0
#align polynomial.nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`-/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
#align polynomial.leading_coeff Polynomial.leadingCoeff
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.monic Polynomial.Monic
@[nontriviality]
theorem monic_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : R[X]) : Monic p :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton Polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.monic.def Polynomial.Monic.def
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
#align polynomial.monic.decidable Polynomial.Monic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.leading_coeff Polynomial.Monic.leadingCoeff
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.Monic.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_zero Polynomial.degree_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_zero Polynomial.natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align polynomial.degree_eq_bot Polynomial.degree_eq_bot
@[nontriviality]
theorem degree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, degree_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem natDegree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : natDegree p = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, natDegree_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.natDegree_of_subsingleton
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
#align polynomial.degree_eq_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree
theorem supDegree_eq_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree id = p.natDegree := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
apply WithBot.coe_injective
rw [← AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_withBot_some_comp, Function.comp_id, supDegree_eq_degree,
degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_withBot]
rwa [support_toFinsupp, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, support_eq_empty]
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_withBot` is required.
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbot'_coe]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
#align polynomial.degree_ne_of_nat_degree_ne Polynomial.degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.le_u_l _
#align polynomial.degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : n ≤ natDegree p := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree]
· exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
· rintro rfl
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → a ≤ natDegree p :=
le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_mem_supp
theorem degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.degree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.degree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_degree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) :
p.natDegree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
#align polynomial.degree_mono Polynomial.degree_mono
theorem supp_subset_range (h : natDegree p < m) : p.support ⊆ Finset.range m := fun _n hn =>
mem_range.2 <| (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hn).trans_lt h
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range Polynomial.supp_subset_range
theorem supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ : p.support ⊆ Finset.range (natDegree p + 1) :=
supp_subset_range (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range_nat_degree_succ Polynomial.supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.degree_le_degree Polynomial.degree_le_degree
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbot'_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbot'_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_iff_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
#align polynomial.degree_le_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.degree_le_of_natDegree_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.monotone_l hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_lt_natDegree {p q : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (hpq : p.degree < q.degree) :
p.natDegree < q.natDegree := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· exact (not_lt_bot <| hq ▸ hpq).elim
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq, Nat.cast_lt] at hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_lt_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_C Polynomial.degree_C
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
#align polynomial.degree_C_le Polynomial.degree_C_le
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
#align polynomial.degree_C_lt Polynomial.degree_C_lt
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
#align polynomial.degree_one_le Polynomial.degree_one_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbot'_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbot_zero']
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C Polynomial.natDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
#align polynomial.nat_degree_one Polynomial.natDegree_one
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_nat_cast Polynomial.natDegree_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natDegree_nat_cast := natDegree_natCast
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias degree_nat_cast_le := degree_natCast_le
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
#align polynomial.degree_monomial Polynomial.degree_monomial
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
#align polynomial.degree_monomial_le Polynomial.degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow_le Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_le Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial Polynomial.natDegree_monomial
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial_le Polynomial.natDegree_monomial_le
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial_eq Polynomial.natDegree_monomial_eq
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < n) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt le_degree_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : p.natDegree < n) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
by_cases hp : p = 0
· subst hp
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe n
· rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt
theorem ext_iff_natDegree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p.natDegree ≤ n) (hq : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
p = q ↔ ∀ i ≤ n, p.coeff i = q.coeff i := by
refine Iff.trans Polynomial.ext_iff ?_
refine forall_congr' fun i => ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => ?_⟩
refine (le_or_lt i n).elim h fun k => ?_
exact
(coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hp.trans_lt k)).trans
(coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hq.trans_lt k)).symm
#align polynomial.ext_iff_nat_degree_le Polynomial.ext_iff_natDegree_le
theorem ext_iff_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p.degree ≤ n) (hq : q.degree ≤ n) :
p = q ↔ ∀ i ≤ n, p.coeff i = q.coeff i :=
ext_iff_natDegree_le (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hp) (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hq)
#align polynomial.ext_iff_degree_le Polynomial.ext_iff_degree_le
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree_succ_eq_zero {p : R[X]} : p.coeff (p.natDegree + 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_add_one _)
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree_succ_eq_zero Polynomial.coeff_natDegree_succ_eq_zero
-- We need the explicit `Decidable` argument here because an exotic one shows up in a moment!
theorem ite_le_natDegree_coeff (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (I : Decidable (n < 1 + natDegree p)) :
@ite _ (n < 1 + natDegree p) I (coeff p n) 0 = coeff p n := by
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· exact (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (not_le.1 fun w => h (Nat.lt_one_add_iff.2 w))).symm
#align polynomial.ite_le_nat_degree_coeff Polynomial.ite_le_natDegree_coeff
theorem as_sum_support (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i) :=
(sum_monomial_eq p).symm
#align polynomial.as_sum_support Polynomial.as_sum_support
theorem as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ p.support, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i :=
_root_.trans p.as_sum_support <| by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
#align polynomial.as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow
/-- We can reexpress a sum over `p.support` as a sum over `range n`,
for any `n` satisfying `p.natDegree < n`.
-/
theorem sum_over_range' [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0) (n : ℕ)
(w : p.natDegree < n) : p.sum f = ∑ a ∈ range n, f a (coeff p a) := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
have := supp_subset_range w
simp only [Polynomial.sum, support, coeff, natDegree, degree] at this ⊢
exact Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ this _ fun n _hn => h n
#align polynomial.sum_over_range' Polynomial.sum_over_range'
/-- We can reexpress a sum over `p.support` as a sum over `range (p.natDegree + 1)`.
-/
theorem sum_over_range [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0) :
p.sum f = ∑ a ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), f a (coeff p a) :=
sum_over_range' p h (p.natDegree + 1) (lt_add_one _)
#align polynomial.sum_over_range Polynomial.sum_over_range
-- TODO this is essentially a duplicate of `sum_over_range`, and should be removed.
theorem sum_fin [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]}
(hn : p.degree < n) : (∑ i : Fin n, f i (p.coeff i)) = p.sum f := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, sum_zero_index, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro i _
exact hf i
rw [sum_over_range' _ hf n ((natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt hp).mpr hn),
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range fun i => f i (p.coeff i)]
#align polynomial.sum_fin Polynomial.sum_fin
theorem as_sum_range' (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (w : p.natDegree < n) :
p = ∑ i ∈ range n, monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_monomial_eq.symm.trans <| p.sum_over_range' monomial_zero_right _ w
#align polynomial.as_sum_range' Polynomial.as_sum_range'
theorem as_sum_range (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_monomial_eq.symm.trans <| p.sum_over_range <| monomial_zero_right
#align polynomial.as_sum_range Polynomial.as_sum_range
theorem as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) :
p = ∑ i ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), C (coeff p i) * X ^ i :=
p.as_sum_range.trans <| by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
#align polynomial.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
#align polynomial.coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree Polynomial.coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (h : degree p ≤ 1) : p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
ext fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (by simp) fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (by simp [coeff_C]) fun m => by
-- Porting note: `by decide` → `Iff.mpr ..`
have : degree p < m.succ.succ := lt_of_le_of_lt h
(Iff.mpr WithBot.coe_lt_coe <| Nat.succ_lt_succ <| Nat.zero_lt_succ m)
simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt this, coeff_C, Nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_X, Nat.succ_inj',
@eq_comm ℕ 0]
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) :
p = C p.leadingCoeff * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
(eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one h.le).trans
(by rw [← Nat.cast_one] at h; rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some h])
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (h : natDegree p ≤ 1) :
p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one <| degree_le_of_natDegree_le h
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_nat_degree_le_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem Monic.eq_X_add_C (hm : p.Monic) (hnd : p.natDegree = 1) : p = X + C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← one_mul X, ← C_1, ← hm.coeff_natDegree, hnd, ← eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one hnd.le]
#align polynomial.monic.eq_X_add_C Polynomial.Monic.eq_X_add_C
theorem exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (h : natDegree p ≤ 1) : ∃ a b, p = C a * X + C b :=
⟨p.coeff 1, p.coeff 0, eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one h⟩
#align polynomial.exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one Polynomial.exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
#align polynomial.degree_X_pow_le Polynomial.degree_X_pow_le
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
#align polynomial.degree_X_le Polynomial.degree_X_le
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_le Polynomial.natDegree_X_le
theorem mem_support_C_mul_X_pow {n a : ℕ} {c : R} (h : a ∈ support (C c * X ^ n)) : a = n :=
mem_singleton.1 <| support_C_mul_X_pow' n c h
#align polynomial.mem_support_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.mem_support_C_mul_X_pow
theorem card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one {c : R} {n : ℕ} : card (support (C c * X ^ n)) ≤ 1 := by
rw [← card_singleton n]
apply card_le_card (support_C_mul_X_pow' n c)
#align polynomial.card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one Polynomial.card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
theorem card_supp_le_succ_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.support.card ≤ p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [← Finset.card_range (p.natDegree + 1)]
exact Finset.card_le_card supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ
#align polynomial.card_supp_le_succ_nat_degree Polynomial.card_supp_le_succ_natDegree
theorem le_degree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → ↑a ≤ degree p :=
le_degree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.le_degree_of_mem_supp Polynomial.le_degree_of_mem_supp
theorem nonempty_support_iff : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← support_eq_empty]
#align polynomial.nonempty_support_iff Polynomial.nonempty_support_iff
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.degree_one Polynomial.degree_one
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.degree_X Polynomial.degree_X
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X Polynomial.natDegree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
theorem coeff_mul_X_sub_C {p : R[X]} {r : R} {a : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (X - C r)) (a + 1) = coeff p a - coeff p (a + 1) * r := by simp [mul_sub]
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_X_sub_C Polynomial.coeff_mul_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
#align polynomial.degree_neg Polynomial.degree_neg
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_neg Polynomial.natDegree_neg
theorem natDegree_neg_le_of_le {p : R[X]} (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) : natDegree (-p) ≤ m :=
(natDegree_neg p).le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast, natDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_intCast Polynomial.natDegree_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natDegree_int_cast := natDegree_intCast
theorem degree_intCast_le (n : ℤ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias degree_int_cast_le := degree_intCast_le
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).leadingCoeff = -p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_neg, coeff_neg]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_neg Polynomial.leadingCoeff_neg
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1)
#align polynomial.next_coeff Polynomial.nextCoeff
lemma nextCoeff_eq_zero :
p.nextCoeff = 0 ↔ p.natDegree = 0 ∨ 0 < p.natDegree ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) = 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff, or_iff_not_imp_left, pos_iff_ne_zero]; aesop
lemma nextCoeff_ne_zero : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) ≠ 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeff (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeff]
simp
#align polynomial.next_coeff_C_eq_zero Polynomial.nextCoeff_C_eq_zero
theorem nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos (hp : 0 < p.natDegree) :
nextCoeff p = p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) := by
rw [nextCoeff, if_neg]
contrapose! hp
simpa
#align polynomial.next_coeff_of_pos_nat_degree Polynomial.nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos
variable {p q : R[X]} {ι : Type*}
theorem coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) :
coeff p (natDegree q) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le h degree_le_natDegree)
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem ne_zero_of_degree_gt {n : WithBot ℕ} (h : n < degree p) : p ≠ 0 :=
mt degree_eq_bot.2 h.ne_bot
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_gt Polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_gt
theorem ne_zero_of_degree_ge_degree (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) (hp : p ≠ 0) : q ≠ 0 :=
Polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_gt
(lt_of_lt_of_le (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr (by rwa [Ne, Polynomial.degree_eq_bot])) hpq :
q.degree > ⊥)
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_ge_degree Polynomial.ne_zero_of_degree_ge_degree
theorem ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt {n : ℕ} (h : n < natDegree p) : p ≠ 0 := fun H => by
simp [H, Nat.not_lt_zero] at h
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_nat_degree_gt Polynomial.ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt
theorem degree_lt_degree (h : natDegree p < natDegree q) : degree p < degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
intro hq
simp [hp, degree_eq_bot.mp hq, lt_irrefl] at h
· rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree <| ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt h, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.degree_lt_degree Polynomial.degree_lt_degree
theorem natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree p < natDegree q ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨degree_lt_degree, fun h ↦ by
have hq : q ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_degree_gt h
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq, Nat.cast_lt] at h⟩
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_nat_degree_iff Polynomial.natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff
theorem eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (h : degree p ≤ 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp
rw [coeff_C, if_neg (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt]
exact h.trans_lt (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 n.succ_pos)
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_le_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_le_zero
theorem eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (h : degree p = 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h.le
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero
theorem degree_le_zero_iff : degree p ≤ 0 ↔ p = C (coeff p 0) :=
⟨eq_C_of_degree_le_zero, fun h => h.symm ▸ degree_C_le⟩
#align polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff
theorem degree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_add]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_add_le _ _ _
#align polynomial.degree_add_le Polynomial.degree_add_le
theorem degree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ n) (hq : degree q ≤ n) :
degree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(degree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
#align polynomial.degree_add_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.degree_add_le_of_degree_le
theorem degree_add_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p + q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
cases' le_max_iff.1 (degree_add_le p q) with h h <;> simp [natDegree_le_natDegree h]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le Polynomial.natDegree_add_le
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : natDegree p ≤ n)
(hq : natDegree q ≤ n) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(natDegree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p + q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_natDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_zero : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_ne_zero
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [leadingCoeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot
lemma natDegree_le_pred (hf : p.natDegree ≤ n) (hn : p.coeff n = 0) : p.natDegree ≤ n - 1 := by
obtain _ | n := n
· exact hf
· refine (Nat.le_succ_iff_eq_or_le.1 hf).resolve_left fun h ↦ ?_
rw [← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← h, coeff_natDegree, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at hn
aesop
theorem natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero (H : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree ∈ p.support := by
rw [mem_support_iff]
exact (not_congr leadingCoeff_eq_zero).mpr H
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mem_support_of_nonzero Polynomial.natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero
theorem natDegree_eq_support_max' (h : p ≠ 0) :
p.natDegree = p.support.max' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) :=
(le_max' _ _ <| natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h).antisymm <|
max'_le _ _ _ le_natDegree_of_mem_supp
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_support_max' Polynomial.natDegree_eq_support_max'
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow_le Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le
theorem degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt (h : degree q < degree p) : degree (p + q) = degree p :=
le_antisymm (max_eq_left_of_lt h ▸ degree_add_le _ _) <|
degree_le_degree <| by
rw [coeff_add, coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt h, add_zero]
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 (ne_zero_of_degree_gt h)
#align polynomial.degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt
theorem degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) : degree (p + q) = degree q := by
rw [add_comm, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt h]
#align polynomial.degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt
theorem natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
natDegree (p + q) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_eq_left_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt
theorem natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree p < natDegree q) :
natDegree (p + q) = natDegree q :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_eq_right_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt
theorem degree_add_C (hp : 0 < degree p) : degree (p + C a) = degree p :=
add_comm (C a) p ▸ degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le hp
#align polynomial.degree_add_C Polynomial.degree_add_C
@[simp] theorem natDegree_add_C {a : R} : (p + C a).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with rfl | hp
· simp
by_cases hpd : p.degree ≤ 0
· rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hpd, ← C_add, natDegree_C, natDegree_C]
· rw [not_le, degree_eq_natDegree hp, Nat.cast_pos, ← natDegree_C a] at hpd
exact natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt hpd
@[simp] theorem natDegree_C_add {a : R} : (C a + p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [add_comm _ p]
theorem degree_add_eq_of_leadingCoeff_add_ne_zero (h : leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
degree (p + q) = max p.degree q.degree :=
le_antisymm (degree_add_le _ _) <|
match lt_trichotomy (degree p) (degree q) with
| Or.inl hlt => by
rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt hlt, max_eq_right_of_lt hlt]
| Or.inr (Or.inl HEq) =>
le_of_not_gt fun hlt : max (degree p) (degree q) > degree (p + q) =>
h <|
show leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q = 0 by
rw [HEq, max_self] at hlt
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq HEq, ← coeff_add]
exact coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt hlt
| Or.inr (Or.inr hlt) => by
rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt hlt, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
#align polynomial.degree_add_eq_of_leading_coeff_add_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_add_eq_of_leadingCoeff_add_ne_zero
lemma natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_left (p q : R[X])
(H : natDegree (p + q) < natDegree p) : natDegree p = natDegree q := by
by_contra h
cases Nat.lt_or_lt_of_ne h with
| inl h => exact lt_asymm h (by rwa [natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt h] at H)
| inr h =>
rw [natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt h] at H
exact LT.lt.false H
lemma natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_right (p q : R[X])
(H : natDegree (p + q) < natDegree q) : natDegree p = natDegree q :=
(natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_left q p (add_comm p q ▸ H)).symm
lemma natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_eq_zero (p q : R[X])
(H : natDegree (p + q) = 0) : natDegree p = natDegree q := by
by_cases h₁ : natDegree p = 0; on_goal 1 => by_cases h₂ : natDegree q = 0
· exact h₁.trans h₂.symm
· apply natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_right; rwa [H, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
· apply natDegree_eq_of_natDegree_add_lt_left; rwa [H, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem degree_erase_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp only [erase_def, degree, coeff, support]
-- Porting note: simpler convert-free proof to be explicit about definition unfolding
apply sup_mono
rw [Finsupp.support_erase]
apply Finset.erase_subset
#align polynomial.degree_erase_le Polynomial.degree_erase_le
theorem degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (natDegree p)) < degree p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree, support_erase]
exact fun h => not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h)
#align polynomial.degree_erase_lt Polynomial.degree_erase_lt
theorem degree_update_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (p.update n a) ≤ max (degree p) n := by
classical
rw [degree, support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (Finset.max_mono (erase_subset _ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
· rw [max_insert, max_comm]
exact le_rfl
#align polynomial.degree_update_le Polynomial.degree_update_le
theorem degree_sum_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.sup fun b => degree (f b) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (by simp only [sum_empty, sup_empty, degree_zero, le_refl])
fun a s has ih =>
calc
degree (∑ i ∈ cons a s has, f i) ≤ max (degree (f a)) (degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i)) := by
rw [Finset.sum_cons]; exact degree_add_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [sup_cons, sup_eq_max]; exact max_le_max le_rfl ih
#align polynomial.degree_sum_le Polynomial.degree_sum_le
theorem degree_mul_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p * q) ≤ degree p + degree q := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_mul_le (WithBot.coe_add _ _).le _ _
#align polynomial.degree_mul_le Polynomial.degree_mul_le
theorem degree_mul_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p * q) ≤ a + b :=
(p.degree_mul_le _).trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_pow_le (p : R[X]) : ∀ n : ℕ, degree (p ^ n) ≤ n • degree p
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]; exact degree_one_le
| n + 1 =>
calc
degree (p ^ (n + 1)) ≤ degree (p ^ n) + degree p := by
rw [pow_succ]; exact degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [succ_nsmul]; exact add_le_add_right (degree_pow_le _ _) _
#align polynomial.degree_pow_le Polynomial.degree_pow_le
theorem degree_pow_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} (b : ℕ) (hp : degree p ≤ a) :
degree (p ^ b) ≤ b * a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp [degree_one_le]
| succ n hn =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ]
exact degree_mul_le_of_le hn hp
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (monomial n a) = a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, (monomial n).map_zero, leadingCoeff_zero]
· rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_monomial, if_neg ha, coeff_monomial]
simp
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_monomial Polynomial.leadingCoeff_monomial
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ n) = a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, leadingCoeff_monomial]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a * X) = a := by
simpa only [pow_one] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow a 1
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_C_mul_X Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_C (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a) = a :=
leadingCoeff_monomial a 0
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_C Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = 1 := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X_pow Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_X : leadingCoeff (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @leadingCoeff_X_pow R _ 1
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X
@[simp]
theorem monic_X_pow (n : ℕ) : Monic (X ^ n : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow n
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow Polynomial.monic_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem monic_X : Monic (X : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X
#align polynomial.monic_X Polynomial.monic_X
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_one : leadingCoeff (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_C 1
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_one Polynomial.leadingCoeff_one
@[simp]
theorem monic_one : Monic (1 : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_C _
#align polynomial.monic_one Polynomial.monic_one
theorem Monic.ne_zero {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [Monic] at hp
#align polynomial.monic.ne_zero Polynomial.Monic.ne_zero
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_ne (h : (0 : R) ≠ 1) {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
exact hp.ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.ne_zero_of_ne Polynomial.Monic.ne_zero_of_ne
theorem monic_of_natDegree_le_of_coeff_eq_one (n : ℕ) (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n = 1) :
Monic p := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
refine (congr_arg _ <| natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero pn ?_).trans p1
exact ne_of_eq_of_ne p1 one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic_of_nat_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one Polynomial.monic_of_natDegree_le_of_coeff_eq_one
theorem monic_of_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one (n : ℕ) (pn : p.degree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n = 1) :
Monic p :=
monic_of_natDegree_le_of_coeff_eq_one n (natDegree_le_of_degree_le pn) p1
#align polynomial.monic_of_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one Polynomial.monic_of_degree_le_of_coeff_eq_one
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne {r} (hp : Monic p) (hne : q ≠ r) : p ≠ 0 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hne
hp.ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne Polynomial.Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne
theorem leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) :
leadingCoeff (p + q) = leadingCoeff q := by
have : coeff p (natDegree q) = 0 := coeff_natDegree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt h
simp only [leadingCoeff, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt h), this,
coeff_add, zero_add]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_add_of_degree_lt Polynomial.leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt
theorem leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt' (h : degree q < degree p) :
leadingCoeff (p + q) = leadingCoeff p := by
rw [add_comm]
exact leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt h
theorem leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq (h : degree p = degree q)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (p + q) = leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff q := by
have : natDegree (p + q) = natDegree p := by
apply natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq
rw [degree_add_eq_of_leadingCoeff_add_ne_zero hlc, h, max_self]
simp only [leadingCoeff, this, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq h, coeff_add]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_add_of_degree_eq Polynomial.leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_degree_add_degree (p q : R[X]) :
coeff (p * q) (natDegree p + natDegree q) = leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q :=
calc
coeff (p * q) (natDegree p + natDegree q) =
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal (natDegree p + natDegree q), coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 :=
coeff_mul _ _ _
_ = coeff p (natDegree p) * coeff q (natDegree q) := by
refine Finset.sum_eq_single (natDegree p, natDegree q) ?_ ?_
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h₁ h₂
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at h₁
by_cases H : natDegree p < i
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_natDegree (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 H)),
zero_mul]
· rw [not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt] at H
cases' H with H H
· subst H
rw [add_left_cancel_iff] at h₁
dsimp at h₁
subst h₁
exact (h₂ rfl).elim
· suffices natDegree q < j by
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_natDegree (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 this)),
mul_zero]
by_contra! H'
exact
ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add_right H j) (Nat.add_le_add_left H' _))
h₁
· intro H
exfalso
apply H
rw [mem_antidiagonal]
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_degree_add_degree Polynomial.coeff_mul_degree_add_degree
theorem degree_mul' (h : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
degree (p * q) = degree p + degree q :=
have hp : p ≠ 0 := by refine mt ?_ h; exact fun hp => by rw [hp, leadingCoeff_zero, zero_mul]
have hq : q ≠ 0 := by refine mt ?_ h; exact fun hq => by rw [hq, leadingCoeff_zero, mul_zero]
le_antisymm (degree_mul_le _ _)
(by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero (n := natDegree p + natDegree q) ?_
rwa [coeff_mul_degree_add_degree])
#align polynomial.degree_mul' Polynomial.degree_mul'
theorem Monic.degree_mul (hq : Monic q) : degree (p * q) = degree p + degree q :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hp : p = 0 then by simp [hp]
else degree_mul' <| by rwa [hq.leadingCoeff, mul_one, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.degree_mul Polynomial.Monic.degree_mul
theorem natDegree_mul' (h : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
natDegree (p * q) = natDegree p + natDegree q :=
have hp : p ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.2 fun h₁ => h <| by rw [h₁, zero_mul]
have hq : q ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.2 fun h₁ => h <| by rw [h₁, mul_zero]
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some <| by
rw [degree_mul' h, Nat.cast_add, degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul' Polynomial.natDegree_mul'
theorem leadingCoeff_mul' (h : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (p * q) = leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [natDegree_mul' h, coeff_mul_degree_add_degree]
rfl
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul' Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul'
theorem monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff_eq_self (h : p.support.card ≤ 1) :
monomial p.natDegree p.leadingCoeff = p := by
classical
rcases card_support_le_one_iff_monomial.1 h with ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> simp [ha]
#align polynomial.monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff_eq_self Polynomial.monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff_eq_self
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_self (h : p.support.card ≤ 1) : C p.leadingCoeff * X ^ p.natDegree = p := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff_eq_self h]
#align polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_self
theorem leadingCoeff_pow' : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 → leadingCoeff (p ^ n) = leadingCoeff p ^ n :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp) fun n ih h => by
have h₁ : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 := fun h₁ => h <| by rw [pow_succ, h₁, zero_mul]
have h₂ : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff (p ^ n) ≠ 0 := by rwa [pow_succ', ← ih h₁] at h
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', leadingCoeff_mul' h₂, ih h₁]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_pow' Polynomial.leadingCoeff_pow'
theorem degree_pow' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 → degree (p ^ n) = n • degree p
| 0 => fun h => by rw [pow_zero, ← C_1] at *; rw [degree_C h, zero_nsmul]
| n + 1 => fun h => by
have h₁ : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0 := fun h₁ => h <| by rw [pow_succ, h₁, zero_mul]
have h₂ : leadingCoeff (p ^ n) * leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 := by
rwa [pow_succ, ← leadingCoeff_pow' h₁] at h
rw [pow_succ, degree_mul' h₂, succ_nsmul, degree_pow' h₁]
#align polynomial.degree_pow' Polynomial.degree_pow'
theorem natDegree_pow' {n : ℕ} (h : leadingCoeff p ^ n ≠ 0) : natDegree (p ^ n) = n * natDegree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hp0 : p = 0 then
if hn0 : n = 0 then by simp [*] else by rw [hp0, zero_pow hn0]; simp
else
have hpn : p ^ n ≠ 0 := fun hpn0 => by
have h1 := h
rw [← leadingCoeff_pow' h1, hpn0, leadingCoeff_zero] at h; exact h rfl
Option.some_inj.1 <|
show (natDegree (p ^ n) : WithBot ℕ) = (n * natDegree p : ℕ) by
rw [← degree_eq_natDegree hpn, degree_pow' h, degree_eq_natDegree hp0]; simp
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow' Polynomial.natDegree_pow'
theorem leadingCoeff_monic_mul {p q : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) :
leadingCoeff (p * q) = leadingCoeff q := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | H)
· simp
· rw [leadingCoeff_mul', hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul]
rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_monic_mul Polynomial.leadingCoeff_monic_mul
theorem leadingCoeff_mul_monic {p q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) :
leadingCoeff (p * q) = leadingCoeff p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : leadingCoeff p = 0 => by
rw [H, leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 H, zero_mul, leadingCoeff_zero])
fun H : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 => by
rw [leadingCoeff_mul', hq.leadingCoeff, mul_one]
rwa [hq.leadingCoeff, mul_one]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul_monic Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_monic
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : leadingCoeff (p * X ^ n) = leadingCoeff p :=
leadingCoeff_mul_monic (monic_X_pow n)
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul_X_pow Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_mul_X {p : R[X]} : leadingCoeff (p * X) = leadingCoeff p :=
leadingCoeff_mul_monic monic_X
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_mul_X Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_X
theorem natDegree_mul_le {p q : R[X]} : natDegree (p * q) ≤ natDegree p + natDegree q := by
apply natDegree_le_of_degree_le
apply le_trans (degree_mul_le p q)
rw [Nat.cast_add]
apply add_le_add <;> apply degree_le_natDegree
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_le Polynomial.natDegree_mul_le
theorem natDegree_mul_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hg : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p * q) ≤ m + n :=
natDegree_mul_le.trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_pow_le {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).natDegree ≤ n * p.natDegree := by
induction' n with i hi
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
apply le_trans natDegree_mul_le
exact add_le_add_right hi _
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow_le Polynomial.natDegree_pow_le
theorem natDegree_pow_le_of_le (n : ℕ) (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) :
natDegree (p ^ n) ≤ n * m :=
natDegree_pow_le.trans (Nat.mul_le_mul le_rfl ‹_›)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_pow_mul_natDegree (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).coeff (n * p.natDegree) = p.leadingCoeff ^ n := by
induction' n with i hi
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
by_cases hp1 : p.leadingCoeff ^ i = 0
· rw [hp1, zero_mul]
by_cases hp2 : p ^ i = 0
· rw [hp2, zero_mul, coeff_zero]
· apply coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt
have h1 : (p ^ i).natDegree < i * p.natDegree := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne natDegree_pow_le fun h => hp2 ?_
rw [← h, hp1] at hi
exact leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hi
calc
(p ^ i * p).natDegree ≤ (p ^ i).natDegree + p.natDegree := natDegree_mul_le
_ < i * p.natDegree + p.natDegree := add_lt_add_right h1 _
· rw [← natDegree_pow' hp1, ← leadingCoeff_pow' hp1]
exact coeff_mul_degree_add_degree _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_pow_mul_nat_degree Polynomial.coeff_pow_mul_natDegree
theorem coeff_mul_add_eq_of_natDegree_le {df dg : ℕ} {f g : R[X]}
(hdf : natDegree f ≤ df) (hdg : natDegree g ≤ dg) :
(f * g).coeff (df + dg) = f.coeff df * g.coeff dg := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (df, dg)]
· rw [mem_antidiagonal]
rintro ⟨df', dg'⟩ hmem hne
obtain h | hdf' := lt_or_le df df'
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hdf.trans_lt h), zero_mul]
obtain h | hdg' := lt_or_le dg dg'
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hdg.trans_lt h), mul_zero]
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ :=
(add_eq_add_iff_eq_and_eq hdf' hdg').mp (mem_antidiagonal.1 hmem)
exact (hne rfl).elim
theorem zero_le_degree_iff : 0 ≤ degree p ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_lt, Nat.WithBot.lt_zero_iff, degree_eq_bot]
#align polynomial.zero_le_degree_iff Polynomial.zero_le_degree_iff
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p.degree ≤ 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.cast_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero
theorem degree_zero_le : degree (0 : R[X]) ≤ 0 := natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp rfl
theorem degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : WithBot ℕ) :
degree f ≤ n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n < m → coeff f m = 0 := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_withBot` is required.
simp only [degree, Finset.max, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_support_iff, Ne, ← not_le,
not_imp_comm, Nat.cast_withBot]
#align polynomial.degree_le_iff_coeff_zero Polynomial.degree_le_iff_coeff_zero
theorem degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
degree f < n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe n), mem_support_iff,
WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← @not_le ℕ, max_eq_sup_coe, Nat.cast_withBot, Ne, not_imp_not]
#align polynomial.degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero Polynomial.degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero
theorem degree_smul_le (a : R) (p : R[X]) : degree (a • p) ≤ degree p := by
refine (degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun m hm => ?_
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
simp [hm m le_rfl]
#align polynomial.degree_smul_le Polynomial.degree_smul_le
theorem natDegree_smul_le (a : R) (p : R[X]) : natDegree (a • p) ≤ natDegree p :=
natDegree_le_natDegree (degree_smul_le a p)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_smul_le Polynomial.natDegree_smul_le
theorem degree_lt_degree_mul_X (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.degree < (p * X).degree := by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp
have : leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff X ≠ 0 := by simpa
erw [degree_mul' this, degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_X, ← WithBot.coe_one,
← WithBot.coe_add, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align polynomial.degree_lt_degree_mul_X Polynomial.degree_lt_degree_mul_X
theorem natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos : 0 < natDegree p ↔ 0 < degree p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pos_iff_degree_pos Polynomial.natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos
theorem eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero (h : natDegree p ≤ 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_degree_le_zero <| degree_le_of_natDegree_le h
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_nat_degree_le_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero
theorem eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero (h : natDegree p = 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero h.le
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero
lemma natDegree_eq_zero {p : R[X]} : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ ∃ x, C x = p :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, (eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero h).symm⟩, by aesop⟩
theorem eq_C_coeff_zero_iff_natDegree_eq_zero : p = C (p.coeff 0) ↔ p.natDegree = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, natDegree_C], eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero⟩
theorem eq_one_of_monic_natDegree_zero (hf : p.Monic) (hfd : p.natDegree = 0) : p = 1 := by
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff, hfd] at hf
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hfd, hf, map_one]
theorem ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree (hdeg : ↑n ≤ p.degree) : p ≠ 0 :=
zero_le_degree_iff.mp <| (WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr n.zero_le).trans hdeg
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree Polynomial.ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree
theorem le_natDegree_of_coe_le_degree (hdeg : ↑n ≤ p.degree) : n ≤ p.natDegree :=
-- Porting note: `.. ▸ ..` → `rwa [..] at ..`
WithBot.coe_le_coe.mp <| by
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree <| ne_zero_of_coe_le_degree hdeg] at hdeg
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_coe_le_degree Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_coe_le_degree
theorem degree_sum_fin_lt {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → R) :
degree (∑ i : Fin n, C (f i) * X ^ (i : ℕ)) < n :=
(degree_sum_le _ _).trans_lt <|
(Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).2 fun k _hk =>
(degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _).trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 k.is_lt
#align polynomial.degree_sum_fin_lt Polynomial.degree_sum_fin_lt
theorem degree_linear_le : degree (C a * X + C b) ≤ 1 :=
degree_add_le_of_degree_le (degree_C_mul_X_le _) <| le_trans degree_C_le Nat.WithBot.coe_nonneg
#align polynomial.degree_linear_le Polynomial.degree_linear_le
theorem degree_linear_lt : degree (C a * X + C b) < 2 :=
degree_linear_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr one_lt_two
#align polynomial.degree_linear_lt Polynomial.degree_linear_lt
theorem degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C b) < degree (C a * X) := by
simpa only [degree_C_mul_X ha] using degree_C_lt
#align polynomial.degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem degree_linear (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X + C b) = 1 := by
rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X ha, degree_C_mul_X ha]
#align polynomial.degree_linear Polynomial.degree_linear
theorem natDegree_linear_le : natDegree (C a * X + C b) ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_linear_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_linear_le Polynomial.natDegree_linear_le
theorem natDegree_linear (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X + C b) = 1 := by
rw [natDegree_add_C, natDegree_C_mul_X a ha]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_linear Polynomial.natDegree_linear
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_linear (ha : a ≠ 0) : leadingCoeff (C a * X + C b) = a := by
rw [add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt (degree_C_lt_degree_C_mul_X ha),
leadingCoeff_C_mul_X]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_linear Polynomial.leadingCoeff_linear
theorem degree_quadratic_le : degree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [add_assoc] using
degree_add_le_of_degree_le (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 2 a)
(le_trans degree_linear_le <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr one_le_two)
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic_le Polynomial.degree_quadratic_le
theorem degree_quadratic_lt : degree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) < 3 :=
degree_quadratic_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr <| lt_add_one 2
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt Polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt
theorem degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degree (C b * X + C c) < degree (C a * X ^ 2) := by
simpa only [degree_C_mul_X_pow 2 ha] using degree_linear_lt
#align polynomial.degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq Polynomial.degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem degree_quadratic (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) = 2 := by
rw [add_assoc, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq ha,
degree_C_mul_X_pow 2 ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic Polynomial.degree_quadratic
theorem natDegree_quadratic_le : natDegree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) ≤ 2 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_quadratic_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_quadratic_le Polynomial.natDegree_quadratic_le
theorem natDegree_quadratic (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) = 2 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some <| degree_quadratic ha
#align polynomial.nat_degree_quadratic Polynomial.natDegree_quadratic
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_quadratic (ha : a ≠ 0) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ 2 + C b * X + C c) = a := by
rw [add_assoc, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt <| degree_linear_lt_degree_C_mul_X_sq ha,
leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_quadratic Polynomial.leadingCoeff_quadratic
theorem degree_cubic_le : degree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) ≤ 3 := by
simpa only [add_assoc] using
degree_add_le_of_degree_le (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 3 a)
(le_trans degree_quadratic_le <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr <| Nat.le_succ 2)
#align polynomial.degree_cubic_le Polynomial.degree_cubic_le
theorem degree_cubic_lt : degree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) < 4 :=
degree_cubic_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr <| lt_add_one 3
#align polynomial.degree_cubic_lt Polynomial.degree_cubic_lt
theorem degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degree (C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) < degree (C a * X ^ 3) := by
simpa only [degree_C_mul_X_pow 3 ha] using degree_quadratic_lt
#align polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb Polynomial.degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb
@[simp]
theorem degree_cubic (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) = 3 := by
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, ← add_assoc (C b * X ^ 2),
degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb ha,
degree_C_mul_X_pow 3 ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_cubic Polynomial.degree_cubic
theorem natDegree_cubic_le : natDegree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) ≤ 3 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_cubic_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_cubic_le Polynomial.natDegree_cubic_le
theorem natDegree_cubic (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) = 3 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some <| degree_cubic ha
#align polynomial.nat_degree_cubic Polynomial.natDegree_cubic
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_cubic (ha : a ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ 3 + C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d) = a := by
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, ← add_assoc (C b * X ^ 2), add_comm,
leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt <| degree_quadratic_lt_degree_C_mul_X_cb ha,
leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_cubic Polynomial.leadingCoeff_cubic
end Semiring
section NontrivialSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]} (n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_pow : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial _ (one_ne_zero' R)]
#align polynomial.degree_X_pow Polynomial.degree_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X_pow : natDegree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_X_pow n)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_pow Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow
@[simp] lemma natDegree_mul_X (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (p * X) = natDegree p + 1 := by
rw [natDegree_mul' (by simpa), natDegree_X]
@[simp] lemma natDegree_X_mul (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (X * p) = natDegree p + 1 := by
rw [commute_X p, natDegree_mul_X hp]
@[simp] lemma natDegree_mul_X_pow (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (p * X ^ n) = natDegree p + n := by
rw [natDegree_mul' (by simpa), natDegree_X_pow]
@[simp] lemma natDegree_X_pow_mul (hp : p ≠ 0) : natDegree (X ^ n * p) = natDegree p + n := by
rw [commute_X_pow, natDegree_mul_X_pow n hp]
-- This lemma explicitly does not require the `Nontrivial R` assumption.
theorem natDegree_X_pow_le {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).natDegree ≤ n := by
nontriviality R
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_pow_le Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow_le
theorem not_isUnit_X : ¬IsUnit (X : R[X]) := fun ⟨⟨_, g, _hfg, hgf⟩, rfl⟩ =>
zero_ne_one' R <| by
rw [← coeff_one_zero, ← hgf]
simp
#align polynomial.not_is_unit_X Polynomial.not_isUnit_X
@[simp]
theorem degree_mul_X : degree (p * X) = degree p + 1 := by simp [monic_X.degree_mul]
#align polynomial.degree_mul_X Polynomial.degree_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem degree_mul_X_pow : degree (p * X ^ n) = degree p + n := by simp [(monic_X_pow n).degree_mul]
#align polynomial.degree_mul_X_pow Polynomial.degree_mul_X_pow
end NontrivialSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_sub_C (hp : 0 < degree p) : degree (p - C a) = degree p := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg, degree_add_C hp]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_sub_C {a : R} : natDegree (p - C a) = natDegree p := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg, natDegree_add_C]
theorem degree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p - q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree_neg q] using degree_add_le p (-q)
#align polynomial.degree_sub_le Polynomial.degree_sub_le
theorem degree_sub_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p - q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem leadingCoeff_sub_of_degree_lt (h : Polynomial.degree q < Polynomial.degree p) :
(p - q).leadingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [← q.degree_neg] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt' h]
theorem leadingCoeff_sub_of_degree_lt' (h : Polynomial.degree p < Polynomial.degree q) :
(p - q).leadingCoeff = -q.leadingCoeff := by
rw [← q.degree_neg] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt h, leadingCoeff_neg]
theorem leadingCoeff_sub_of_degree_eq (h : degree p = degree q)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p ≠ leadingCoeff q) :
leadingCoeff (p - q) = leadingCoeff p - leadingCoeff q := by
replace h : degree p = degree (-q) := by rwa [q.degree_neg]
replace hlc : leadingCoeff p + leadingCoeff (-q) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← sub_ne_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, ← q.leadingCoeff_neg] at hlc
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_eq h hlc, leadingCoeff_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem natDegree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p - q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
simpa only [← natDegree_neg q] using natDegree_add_le p (-q)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub_le Polynomial.natDegree_sub_le
theorem natDegree_sub_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p - q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_sub_lt (hd : degree p = degree q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p = leadingCoeff q) : degree (p - q) < degree p :=
have hp : monomial (natDegree p) (leadingCoeff p) + p.erase (natDegree p) = p :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hq : monomial (natDegree q) (leadingCoeff q) + q.erase (natDegree q) = q :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hd' : natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [hd]
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := mt degree_eq_bot.2 (hd ▸ mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp0)
calc
degree (p - q) = degree (erase (natDegree q) p + -erase (natDegree q) q) := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← hp, ← hq, hlc, hd', add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (degree (erase (natDegree q) p)) (degree (erase (natDegree q) q)) :=
(degree_neg (erase (natDegree q) q) ▸ degree_add_le _ _)
_ < degree p := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨hd' ▸ degree_erase_lt hp0, hd.symm ▸ degree_erase_lt hq0⟩
#align polynomial.degree_sub_lt Polynomial.degree_sub_lt
theorem degree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).degree ≤ 1 :=
(degree_sub_le _ _).trans (max_le degree_X_le (degree_C_le.trans zero_le_one))
#align polynomial.degree_X_sub_C_le Polynomial.degree_X_sub_C_le
theorem natDegree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_X_sub_C_le r
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_sub_C_le Polynomial.natDegree_X_sub_C_le
theorem degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt (h : degree q < degree p) : degree (p - q) = degree p := by
rw [← degree_neg q] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt h]
#align polynomial.degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt
theorem degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) : degree (p - q) = degree q := by
rw [← degree_neg q] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt h, degree_neg]
#align polynomial.degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt Polynomial.degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt
theorem natDegree_sub_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
natDegree (p - q) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub_eq_left_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_sub_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt
theorem natDegree_sub_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt (h : natDegree p < natDegree q) :
natDegree (p - q) = natDegree q :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt (degree_lt_degree h))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sub_eq_right_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_sub_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt
end Ring
section NonzeroRing
variable [Nontrivial R]
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_add_C (a : R) : degree (X + C a) = 1 := by
have : degree (C a) < degree (X : R[X]) :=
calc
degree (C a) ≤ 0 := degree_C_le
_ < 1 := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
_ = degree X := degree_X.symm
rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt this, degree_X]
#align polynomial.degree_X_add_C Polynomial.degree_X_add_C
theorem natDegree_X_add_C (x : R) : (X + C x).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some <| degree_X_add_C x
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_add_C Polynomial.natDegree_X_add_C
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_X_add_C [Semiring S] (c : S) : nextCoeff (X + C c) = c := by
nontriviality S
simp [nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos]
#align polynomial.next_coeff_X_add_C Polynomial.nextCoeff_X_add_C
theorem degree_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n + C a) = n := by
have : degree (C a) < degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) := degree_C_le.trans_lt <| by
rwa [degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_pos]
rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt this, degree_X_pow]
#align polynomial.degree_X_pow_add_C Polynomial.degree_X_pow_add_C
theorem X_pow_add_C_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) : (X : R[X]) ^ n + C a ≠ 0 :=
mt degree_eq_bot.2
(show degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n + C a) ≠ ⊥ by
rw [degree_X_pow_add_C hn a]; exact WithBot.coe_ne_bot)
#align polynomial.X_pow_add_C_ne_zero Polynomial.X_pow_add_C_ne_zero
theorem X_add_C_ne_zero (r : R) : X + C r ≠ 0 :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ X_pow_add_C_ne_zero zero_lt_one r
#align polynomial.X_add_C_ne_zero Polynomial.X_add_C_ne_zero
theorem zero_nmem_multiset_map_X_add_C {α : Type*} (m : Multiset α) (f : α → R) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ m.map fun a => X + C (f a) := fun mem =>
let ⟨_a, _, ha⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp mem
X_add_C_ne_zero _ ha
#align polynomial.zero_nmem_multiset_map_X_add_C Polynomial.zero_nmem_multiset_map_X_add_C
theorem natDegree_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (X ^ n + C r).natDegree = n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← RingHom.map_add, natDegree_C]
· exact natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_X_pow_add_C (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn) r)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_pow_add_C Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow_add_C
theorem X_pow_add_C_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) : (X : R[X]) ^ n + C a ≠ 1 := fun h =>
hn.ne' <| by simpa only [natDegree_X_pow_add_C, natDegree_one] using congr_arg natDegree h
#align polynomial.X_pow_add_C_ne_one Polynomial.X_pow_add_C_ne_one
theorem X_add_C_ne_one (r : R) : X + C r ≠ 1 :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ X_pow_add_C_ne_one zero_lt_one r
#align polynomial.X_add_C_ne_one Polynomial.X_add_C_ne_one
end Semiring
end NonzeroRing
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {r : R} :
(X ^ n + C r).leadingCoeff = 1 := by
nontriviality R
rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_X_pow_add_C, coeff_add, coeff_X_pow_self, coeff_C,
if_neg (pos_iff_ne_zero.mp hn), add_zero]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X_pow_add_C Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow_add_C
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_X_add_C [Semiring S] (r : S) : (X + C r).leadingCoeff = 1 := by
rw [← pow_one (X : S[X]), leadingCoeff_X_pow_add_C zero_lt_one]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X_add_C Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_add_C
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow_add_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : (X ^ n + 1 : R[X]).leadingCoeff = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow_add_C hn
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X_pow_add_one Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow_add_one
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_pow_X_add_C (r : R) (i : ℕ) : leadingCoeff ((X + C r) ^ i) = 1 := by
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_pow'] <;> simp
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_pow_X_add_C Polynomial.leadingCoeff_pow_X_add_C
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {r : R} :
(X ^ n - C r).leadingCoeff = 1 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← map_neg C r, leadingCoeff_X_pow_add_C hn]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X_pow_sub_C Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow_sub_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : (X ^ n - 1 : R[X]).leadingCoeff = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow_sub_C hn
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_X_pow_sub_one Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow_sub_one
variable [Nontrivial R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_sub_C (a : R) : degree (X - C a) = 1 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← map_neg C a, degree_X_add_C]
#align polynomial.degree_X_sub_C Polynomial.degree_X_sub_C
theorem natDegree_X_sub_C (x : R) : (X - C x).natDegree = 1 := by
rw [natDegree_sub_C, natDegree_X]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_sub_C Polynomial.natDegree_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_X_sub_C [Ring S] (c : S) : nextCoeff (X - C c) = -c := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← map_neg C c, nextCoeff_X_add_C]
#align polynomial.next_coeff_X_sub_C Polynomial.nextCoeff_X_sub_C
theorem degree_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) = n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← map_neg C a, degree_X_pow_add_C hn]
#align polynomial.degree_X_pow_sub_C Polynomial.degree_X_pow_sub_C
theorem X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) : (X : R[X]) ^ n - C a ≠ 0 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← map_neg C a]
exact X_pow_add_C_ne_zero hn _
#align polynomial.X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero Polynomial.X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero
theorem X_sub_C_ne_zero (r : R) : X - C r ≠ 0 :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero zero_lt_one r
#align polynomial.X_sub_C_ne_zero Polynomial.X_sub_C_ne_zero
theorem zero_nmem_multiset_map_X_sub_C {α : Type*} (m : Multiset α) (f : α → R) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ m.map fun a => X - C (f a) := fun mem =>
let ⟨_a, _, ha⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp mem
X_sub_C_ne_zero _ ha
#align polynomial.zero_nmem_multiset_map_X_sub_C Polynomial.zero_nmem_multiset_map_X_sub_C
theorem natDegree_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (X ^ n - C r).natDegree = n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← map_neg C r, natDegree_X_pow_add_C]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_pow_sub_C Polynomial.natDegree_X_pow_sub_C
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 1,637 | 1,638 | theorem leadingCoeff_X_sub_C [Ring S] (r : S) : (X - C r).leadingCoeff = 1 := by |
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← map_neg C r, leadingCoeff_X_add_C]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Complex
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.cyclotomic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdeecc0d03cd40f7a165e6cf00a4d2286db599f"
/-!
# Cyclotomic polynomials.
For `n : ℕ` and an integral domain `R`, we define a modified version of the `n`-th cyclotomic
polynomial with coefficients in `R`, denoted `cyclotomic' n R`, as `∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ` varies
over the primitive `n`th roots of unity. If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R` then
this the standard definition. We then define the standard cyclotomic polynomial `cyclotomic n R`
with coefficients in any ring `R`.
## Main definition
* `cyclotomic n R` : the `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`.
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_cyclotomic` : The degree of `cyclotomic n` is `totient n`.
* `Polynomial.prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one` : `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (cyclotomic i)`, where `i`
divides `n`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_eq_prod_X_pow_sub_one_pow_moebius` : The Möbius inversion formula for
`cyclotomic n R` over an abstract fraction field for `R[X]`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `cyclotomic' n R` makes sense in any integral domain `R`, but the interesting
results hold if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. In particular, our definition is
not the standard one unless there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R`. For example,
`cyclotomic' 3 ℤ = 1`, since there are no primitive cube roots of unity in `ℤ`. The main example is
`R = ℂ`, we decided to work in general since the difficulties are essentially the same.
To get the standard cyclotomic polynomials, we use `unique_int_coeff_of_cycl`, with `R = ℂ`,
to get a polynomial with integer coefficients and then we map it to `R[X]`, for any ring `R`.
-/
open scoped Polynomial
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace Polynomial
section Cyclotomic'
section IsDomain
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
/-- The modified `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`, it is the usual cyclotomic
polynomial if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. -/
def cyclotomic' (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : R[X] :=
∏ μ ∈ primitiveRoots n R, (X - C μ)
#align polynomial.cyclotomic' Polynomial.cyclotomic'
/-- The zeroth modified cyclotomic polyomial is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_zero (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 0 R = 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_empty, primitiveRoots_zero]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_zero Polynomial.cyclotomic'_zero
/-- The first modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X - 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_one (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 1 R = X - 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_one,
IsPrimitiveRoot.primitiveRoots_one]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_one Polynomial.cyclotomic'_one
/-- The second modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X + 1` if the characteristic of `R` is not `2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_two (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (p : ℕ) [CharP R p] (hp : p ≠ 2) :
cyclotomic' 2 R = X + 1 := by
rw [cyclotomic']
have prim_root_two : primitiveRoots 2 R = {(-1 : R)} := by
simp only [Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_primitiveRoots two_pos]
exact ⟨IsPrimitiveRoot.neg_one p hp, fun x => IsPrimitiveRoot.eq_neg_one_of_two_right⟩
simp only [prim_root_two, Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_neg, RingHom.map_one, sub_neg_eq_add]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_two Polynomial.cyclotomic'_two
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is monic. -/
theorem cyclotomic'.monic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).Monic :=
monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun _ _ => monic_X_sub_C _
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'.monic Polynomial.cyclotomic'.monic
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is different from `0`. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' n R ≠ 0 :=
(cyclotomic'.monic n R).ne_zero
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_ne_zero Polynomial.cyclotomic'_ne_zero
/-- The natural degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of
unity in `R`. -/
theorem natDegree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).natDegree = Nat.totient n := by
rw [cyclotomic']
rw [natDegree_prod (primitiveRoots n R) fun z : R => X - C z]
· simp only [IsPrimitiveRoot.card_primitiveRoots h, mul_one, natDegree_X_sub_C, Nat.cast_id,
Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
intro z _
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero z
#align polynomial.nat_degree_cyclotomic' Polynomial.natDegree_cyclotomic'
/-- The degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of unity in `R`. -/
theorem degree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).degree = Nat.totient n := by
simp only [degree_eq_natDegree (cyclotomic'_ne_zero n R), natDegree_cyclotomic' h]
#align polynomial.degree_cyclotomic' Polynomial.degree_cyclotomic'
/-- The roots of `cyclotomic' n R` are the primitive `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem roots_of_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).roots = (primitiveRoots n R).val := by
rw [cyclotomic']; exact roots_prod_X_sub_C (primitiveRoots n R)
#align polynomial.roots_of_cyclotomic Polynomial.roots_of_cyclotomic
/-- If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ`
varies over the `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
X ^ n - 1 = ∏ ζ ∈ nthRootsFinset n R, (X - C ζ) := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset, ← Multiset.toFinset_eq (IsPrimitiveRoot.nthRoots_one_nodup h)]
simp only [Finset.prod_mk, RingHom.map_one]
rw [nthRoots]
have hmonic : (X ^ n - C (1 : R)).Monic := monic_X_pow_sub_C (1 : R) (ne_of_lt hpos).symm
symm
apply prod_multiset_X_sub_C_of_monic_of_roots_card_eq hmonic
rw [@natDegree_X_pow_sub_C R _ _ n 1, ← nthRoots]
exact IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod Polynomial.X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod
end IsDomain
section Field
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- `cyclotomic' n K` splits. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_splits (n : ℕ) : Splits (RingHom.id K) (cyclotomic' n K) := by
apply splits_prod (RingHom.id K)
intro z _
simp only [splits_X_sub_C (RingHom.id K)]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic'_splits Polynomial.cyclotomic'_splits
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1` splits. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 159 | 161 | theorem X_pow_sub_one_splits {ζ : K} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
Splits (RingHom.id K) (X ^ n - C (1 : K)) := by |
rw [splits_iff_card_roots, ← nthRoots, IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.NatInt
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneConvergence
#align_import topology.algebra.infinite_sum.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Infinite sum or product in an order
This file provides lemmas about the interaction of infinite sums and products and order operations.
-/
open Finset Filter Function
open scoped Classical
variable {ι κ α : Type*}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [T2Space α]
{f : ℕ → α} {c : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_le_of_prod_range_le (hf : Multipliable f) (h : ∀ n, ∏ i ∈ range n, f i ≤ c) :
∏' n, f n ≤ c :=
let ⟨_l, hl⟩ := hf
hl.tprod_eq.symm ▸ le_of_tendsto' hl.tendsto_prod_nat h
#align tsum_le_of_sum_range_le tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
end Preorder
section OrderedCommMonoid
variable [OrderedCommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {f g : ι → α}
{a a₁ a₂ : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_le (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) (hf : HasProd f a₁) (hg : HasProd g a₂) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hf hg fun _ ↦ prod_le_prod' fun i _ ↦ h i
#align has_sum_le hasSum_le
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem hasProd_mono (hf : HasProd f a₁) (hg : HasProd g a₂) (h : f ≤ g) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
hasProd_le h hf hg
#align has_sum_mono hasSum_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_le_of_prod_le (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ s, ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ a₂) : a ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto' hf h
#align has_sum_le_of_sum_le hasSum_le_of_sum_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_hasProd_of_le_prod (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ s, a₂ ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f i) : a₂ ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto' hf h
#align le_has_sum_of_le_sum le_hasSum_of_le_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_le_inj {g : κ → α} (e : ι → κ) (he : Injective e)
(hs : ∀ c, c ∉ Set.range e → 1 ≤ g c) (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g (e i)) (hf : HasProd f a₁)
(hg : HasProd g a₂) : a₁ ≤ a₂ := by
rw [← hasProd_extend_one he] at hf
refine hasProd_le (fun c ↦ ?_) hf hg
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ | h := em (c ∈ Set.range e)
· rw [he.extend_apply]
exact h _
· rw [extend_apply' _ _ _ h]
exact hs _ h
#align has_sum_le_inj hasSum_le_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_le_tprod_of_inj {g : κ → α} (e : ι → κ) (he : Injective e)
(hs : ∀ c, c ∉ Set.range e → 1 ≤ g c) (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g (e i)) (hf : Multipliable f)
(hg : Multipliable g) : tprod f ≤ tprod g :=
hasProd_le_inj _ he hs h hf.hasProd hg.hasProd
#align tsum_le_tsum_of_inj tsum_le_tsum_of_inj
@[to_additive]
lemma tprod_subtype_le {κ γ : Type*} [OrderedCommGroup γ] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformGroup γ]
[OrderClosedTopology γ] [ CompleteSpace γ] (f : κ → γ) (β : Set κ) (h : ∀ a : κ, 1 ≤ f a)
(hf : Multipliable f) : (∏' (b : β), f b) ≤ (∏' (a : κ), f a) := by
apply tprod_le_tprod_of_inj _ (Subtype.coe_injective) (by simp only [Subtype.range_coe_subtype,
Set.setOf_mem_eq, h, implies_true]) (by simp only [le_refl,
Subtype.forall, implies_true]) (by apply hf.subtype)
apply hf
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_le_hasProd (s : Finset ι) (hs : ∀ i, i ∉ s → 1 ≤ f i) (hf : HasProd f a) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto hf (eventually_atTop.2
⟨s, fun _t hst ↦ prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' hst fun i _ hbs ↦ hs i hbs⟩)
#align sum_le_has_sum sum_le_hasSum
@[to_additive]
theorem isLUB_hasProd (h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (hf : HasProd f a) :
IsLUB (Set.range fun s ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i) a :=
isLUB_of_tendsto_atTop (Finset.prod_mono_set_of_one_le' h) hf
#align is_lub_has_sum isLUB_hasSum
@[to_additive]
theorem le_hasProd (hf : HasProd f a) (i : ι) (hb : ∀ j, j ≠ i → 1 ≤ f j) : f i ≤ a :=
calc
f i = ∏ i ∈ {i}, f i := by rw [prod_singleton]
_ ≤ a := prod_le_hasProd _ (by simpa) hf
#align le_has_sum le_hasSum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_le_tprod {f : ι → α} (s : Finset ι) (hs : ∀ i, i ∉ s → 1 ≤ f i) (hf : Multipliable f) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ ∏' i, f i :=
prod_le_hasProd s hs hf.hasProd
#align sum_le_tsum sum_le_tsum
@[to_additive]
theorem le_tprod (hf : Multipliable f) (i : ι) (hb : ∀ j, j ≠ i → 1 ≤ f j) : f i ≤ ∏' i, f i :=
le_hasProd hf.hasProd i hb
#align le_tsum le_tsum
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_le_tprod (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
∏' i, f i ≤ ∏' i, g i :=
hasProd_le h hf.hasProd hg.hasProd
#align tsum_le_tsum tsum_le_tsum
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem tprod_mono (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) (h : f ≤ g) :
∏' n, f n ≤ ∏' n, g n :=
tprod_le_tprod h hf hg
#align tsum_mono tsum_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_le_of_prod_le (hf : Multipliable f) (h : ∀ s, ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ a₂) : ∏' i, f i ≤ a₂ :=
hasProd_le_of_prod_le hf.hasProd h
#align tsum_le_of_sum_le tsum_le_of_sum_le
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_le_of_prod_le' (ha₂ : 1 ≤ a₂) (h : ∀ s, ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ a₂) : ∏' i, f i ≤ a₂ := by
by_cases hf : Multipliable f
· exact tprod_le_of_prod_le hf h
· rw [tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable hf]
exact ha₂
#align tsum_le_of_sum_le' tsum_le_of_sum_le'
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.one_le (h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ g i) (ha : HasProd g a) : 1 ≤ a :=
hasProd_le h hasProd_one ha
#align has_sum.nonneg HasSum.nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.le_one (h : ∀ i, g i ≤ 1) (ha : HasProd g a) : a ≤ 1 :=
hasProd_le h ha hasProd_one
#align has_sum.nonpos HasSum.nonpos
@[to_additive tsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_tprod (h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ g i) : 1 ≤ ∏' i, g i := by
by_cases hg : Multipliable g
· exact hg.hasProd.one_le h
· rw [tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable hg]
#align tsum_nonneg tsum_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_le_one (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ 1) : ∏' i, f i ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hf : Multipliable f
· exact hf.hasProd.le_one h
· rw [tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable hf]
#align tsum_nonpos tsum_nonpos
-- Porting note: generalized from `OrderedAddCommGroup` to `OrderedAddCommMonoid`
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Order.lean | 175 | 180 | theorem hasProd_one_iff_of_one_le (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) : HasProd f 1 ↔ f = 1 := by |
refine ⟨fun hf' ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· ext i
exact (hf i).antisymm' (le_hasProd hf' _ fun j _ ↦ hf j)
· rintro rfl
exact hasProd_one
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Nonarchimedean.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformRing
#align_import topology.algebra.nonarchimedean.adic_topology from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Adic topology
Given a commutative ring `R` and an ideal `I` in `R`, this file constructs the unique
topology on `R` which is compatible with the ring structure and such that a set is a neighborhood
of zero if and only if it contains a power of `I`. This topology is non-archimedean: every
neighborhood of zero contains an open subgroup, namely a power of `I`.
It also studies the predicate `IsAdic` which states that a given topological ring structure is
adic, proving a characterization and showing that raising an ideal to a positive power does not
change the associated topology.
Finally, it defines `WithIdeal`, a class registering an ideal in a ring and providing the
corresponding adic topology to the type class inference system.
## Main definitions and results
* `Ideal.adic_basis`: the basis of submodules given by powers of an ideal.
* `Ideal.adicTopology`: the adic topology associated to an ideal. It has the above basis
for neighborhoods of zero.
* `Ideal.nonarchimedean`: the adic topology is non-archimedean
* `isAdic_iff`: A topological ring is `J`-adic if and only if it admits the powers of `J` as
a basis of open neighborhoods of zero.
* `WithIdeal`: a class registering an ideal in a ring.
## Implementation notes
The `I`-adic topology on a ring `R` has a contrived definition using `I^n • ⊤` instead of `I`
to make sure it is definitionally equal to the `I`-topology on `R` seen as an `R`-module.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
open Set TopologicalAddGroup Submodule Filter
open Topology Pointwise
namespace Ideal
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Nonarchimedean/AdicTopology.lean | 54 | 73 | theorem adic_basis (I : Ideal R) : SubmodulesRingBasis fun n : ℕ => (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) :=
{ inter := by |
suffices ∀ i j : ℕ, ∃ k, I ^ k ≤ I ^ i ∧ I ^ k ≤ I ^ j by
simpa only [smul_eq_mul, mul_top, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id, le_inf_iff] using this
intro i j
exact ⟨max i j, pow_le_pow_right (le_max_left i j), pow_le_pow_right (le_max_right i j)⟩
leftMul := by
suffices ∀ (a : R) (i : ℕ), ∃ j : ℕ, a • I ^ j ≤ I ^ i by
simpa only [smul_top_eq_map, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id] using this
intro r n
use n
rintro a ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (I ^ n).smul_mem r hx
mul := by
suffices ∀ i : ℕ, ∃ j : ℕ, (↑(I ^ j) * ↑(I ^ j) : Set R) ⊆ (↑(I ^ i) : Set R) by
simpa only [smul_top_eq_map, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id] using this
intro n
use n
rintro a ⟨x, _hx, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact (I ^ n).smul_mem x hb }
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
#align_import algebra.algebra.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bd9851ca476957ea4549eb19b40e7b5ade9428cc"
/-!
# Isomorphisms of `R`-algebras
This file defines bundled isomorphisms of `R`-algebras.
## Main definitions
* `AlgEquiv R A B`: the type of `R`-algebra isomorphisms between `A` and `B`.
## Notations
* `A ≃ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra equivalence from `A` to `B`.
-/
universe u v w u₁ v₁
/-- An equivalence of algebras is an equivalence of rings commuting with the actions of scalars. -/
structure AlgEquiv (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] extends A ≃ B, A ≃* B, A ≃+ B, A ≃+* B where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
protected commutes' : ∀ r : R, toFun (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
#align alg_equiv AlgEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toAddEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toMulEquiv
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 A " ≃ₐ[" R "] " A' => AlgEquiv R A A'
/-- `AlgEquivClass F R A B` states that `F` is a type of algebra structure preserving
equivalences. You should extend this class when you extend `AlgEquiv`. -/
class AlgEquivClass (F : Type*) (R A B : outParam Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B]
extends RingEquivClass F A B : Prop where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
commutes : ∀ (f : F) (r : R), f (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
#align alg_equiv_class AlgEquivClass
-- Porting note: Removed nolint dangerousInstance from AlgEquivClass.toRingEquivClass
namespace AlgEquivClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) toAlgHomClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] :
AlgHomClass F R A B :=
{ h with }
#align alg_equiv_class.to_alg_hom_class AlgEquivClass.toAlgHomClass
instance (priority := 100) toLinearEquivClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R]
[Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] : LinearEquivClass F R A B :=
{ h with map_smulₛₗ := fun f => map_smulₛₗ f }
#align alg_equiv_class.to_linear_equiv_class AlgEquivClass.toLinearEquivClass
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AlgEquivClass F R A B` into an actual `AlgEquiv`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `A ≃ₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgEquiv {F R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A]
[Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] (f : F) : A ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A ≃ B), (f : A ≃+* B) with commutes' := commutes f }
instance (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] : CoeTC F (A ≃ₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toAlgEquiv⟩
end AlgEquivClass
namespace AlgEquiv
universe uR uA₁ uA₂ uA₃ uA₁' uA₂' uA₃'
variable {R : Type uR}
variable {A₁ : Type uA₁} {A₂ : Type uA₂} {A₃ : Type uA₃}
variable {A₁' : Type uA₁'} {A₂' : Type uA₂'} {A₃' : Type uA₃'}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A₁] [Semiring A₂] [Semiring A₃]
variable [Semiring A₁'] [Semiring A₂'] [Semiring A₃']
variable [Algebra R A₁] [Algebra R A₂] [Algebra R A₃]
variable [Algebra R A₁'] [Algebra R A₂'] [Algebra R A₃']
variable (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
instance : EquivLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
inv f := f.invFun
left_inv f := f.left_inv
right_inv f := f.right_inv
coe_injective' f g h₁ h₂ := by
obtain ⟨⟨f,_⟩,_⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨g,_⟩,_⟩ := g
congr
/-- Helper instance since the coercion is not always found. -/
instance : FunLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe := DFunLike.coe
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective'
instance : AlgEquivClass (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) R A₁ A₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
commutes f := f.commutes'
-- Porting note: the default simps projection was `e.toEquiv.toFun`, it should be `FunLike.coe`
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ → A₂ :=
e
-- Porting note: the default simps projection was `e.toEquiv`, it should be `EquivLike.toEquiv`
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.toEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ ≃ A₂ :=
e
-- Porting note: `protected` used to be an attribute below
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = f :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_coe AlgEquiv.coe_coe
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align alg_equiv.ext AlgEquiv.ext
protected theorem congr_arg {f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} {x x' : A₁} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
#align alg_equiv.congr_arg AlgEquiv.congr_arg
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : f = g) (x : A₁) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
#align alg_equiv.congr_fun AlgEquiv.congr_fun
protected theorem ext_iff {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align alg_equiv.ext_iff AlgEquiv.ext_iff
theorem coe_fun_injective : @Function.Injective (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ → A₂) fun e => (e : A₁ → A₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
#align alg_equiv.coe_fun_injective AlgEquiv.coe_fun_injective
-- Porting note: Made to CoeOut instance from Coe, not dangerous anymore
instance hasCoeToRingEquiv : CoeOut (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
⟨AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv⟩
#align alg_equiv.has_coe_to_ring_equiv AlgEquiv.hasCoeToRingEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {toFun invFun left_inv right_inv map_mul map_add commutes} :
⇑(⟨⟨toFun, invFun, left_inv, right_inv⟩, map_mul, map_add, commutes⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = toFun :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_mk AlgEquiv.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨e, e', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = e :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align alg_equiv.mk_coe AlgEquiv.mk_coe
-- Porting note: `toFun_eq_coe` no longer needed in Lean4
#noalign alg_equiv.to_fun_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem toEquiv_eq_coe : e.toEquiv = e :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.to_equiv_eq_coe AlgEquiv.toEquiv_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem toRingEquiv_eq_coe : e.toRingEquiv = e :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.to_ring_equiv_eq_coe AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toRingEquiv_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ringEquiv : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_ring_equiv AlgEquiv.coe_ringEquiv
theorem coe_ringEquiv' : (e.toRingEquiv : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_ring_equiv' AlgEquiv.coe_ringEquiv'
theorem coe_ringEquiv_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| RingEquiv.congr_fun h
#align alg_equiv.coe_ring_equiv_injective AlgEquiv.coe_ringEquiv_injective
protected theorem map_add : ∀ x y, e (x + y) = e x + e y :=
map_add e
#align alg_equiv.map_add AlgEquiv.map_add
protected theorem map_zero : e 0 = 0 :=
map_zero e
#align alg_equiv.map_zero AlgEquiv.map_zero
protected theorem map_mul : ∀ x y, e (x * y) = e x * e y :=
map_mul e
#align alg_equiv.map_mul AlgEquiv.map_mul
protected theorem map_one : e 1 = 1 :=
map_one e
#align alg_equiv.map_one AlgEquiv.map_one
@[simp]
theorem commutes : ∀ r : R, e (algebraMap R A₁ r) = algebraMap R A₂ r :=
e.commutes'
#align alg_equiv.commutes AlgEquiv.commutes
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem map_smul (r : R) (x : A₁) : e (r • x) = r • e x := by
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, map_mul, commutes]
#align alg_equiv.map_smul AlgEquiv.map_smul
@[deprecated _root_.map_sum (since := "2023-12-26")]
nonrec theorem map_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → A₁) (s : Finset ι) :
e (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, e (f x) :=
map_sum e f s
#align alg_equiv.map_sum AlgEquiv.map_sum
theorem map_finsupp_sum {α : Type*} [Zero α] {ι : Type*} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A₁) :
e (f.sum g) = f.sum fun i b => e (g i b) :=
_root_.map_sum e _ _
#align alg_equiv.map_finsupp_sum AlgEquiv.map_finsupp_sum
-- Porting note: Added [coe] attribute
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as an algebra homomorphism.
This definition is included for symmetry with the other `to*Hom` projections.
The `simp` normal form is to use the coercion of the `AlgHomClass.coeTC` instance. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgHom : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ e with
map_one' := e.map_one
map_zero' := e.map_zero }
#align alg_equiv.to_alg_hom AlgEquiv.toAlgHom
@[simp]
theorem toAlgHom_eq_coe : e.toAlgHom = e :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.to_alg_hom_eq_coe AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algHom : DFunLike.coe (e.toAlgHom) = DFunLike.coe e :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_alg_hom AlgEquiv.coe_algHom
theorem coe_algHom_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| AlgHom.congr_fun h
#align alg_equiv.coe_alg_hom_injective AlgEquiv.coe_algHom_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toAlgHom_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
/-- The two paths coercion can take to a `RingHom` are equivalent -/
theorem coe_ringHom_commutes : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_ring_hom_commutes AlgEquiv.coe_ringHom_commutes
protected theorem map_pow : ∀ (x : A₁) (n : ℕ), e (x ^ n) = e x ^ n :=
map_pow _
#align alg_equiv.map_pow AlgEquiv.map_pow
protected theorem injective : Function.Injective e :=
EquivLike.injective e
#align alg_equiv.injective AlgEquiv.injective
protected theorem surjective : Function.Surjective e :=
EquivLike.surjective e
#align alg_equiv.surjective AlgEquiv.surjective
protected theorem bijective : Function.Bijective e :=
EquivLike.bijective e
#align alg_equiv.bijective AlgEquiv.bijective
/-- Algebra equivalences are reflexive. -/
@[refl]
def refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ (1 : A₁ ≃+* A₁) with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
#align alg_equiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl
instance : Inhabited (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
⟨refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_toAlgHom : ↑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = AlgHom.id R A₁ :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.refl_to_alg_hom AlgEquiv.refl_toAlgHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_refl : ⇑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = id :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_refl AlgEquiv.coe_refl
/-- Algebra equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ e.toRingEquiv.symm with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [← e.toRingEquiv.symm_apply_apply (algebraMap R A₁ r)]
congr
change _ = e _
rw [e.commutes] }
#align alg_equiv.symm AlgEquiv.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ → A₁ :=
e.symm
#align alg_equiv.simps.symm_apply AlgEquiv.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections AlgEquiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
--@[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this once symm_mk is introduced
theorem coe_apply_coe_coe_symm_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₂) :
f ((f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm x) = x :=
EquivLike.right_inv f x
#align alg_equiv.coe_apply_coe_coe_symm_apply AlgEquiv.coe_apply_coe_coe_symm_apply
--@[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this once symm_mk is introduced
theorem coe_coe_symm_apply_coe_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₁) :
(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm (f x) = x :=
EquivLike.left_inv f x
#align alg_equiv.coe_coe_symm_apply_coe_apply AlgEquiv.coe_coe_symm_apply_coe_apply
-- Porting note: `simp` normal form of `invFun_eq_symm`
@[simp]
theorem symm_toEquiv_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : (e : A₁ ≃ A₂).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
theorem invFun_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : e.invFun = e.symm :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.inv_fun_eq_symm AlgEquiv.invFun_eq_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.symm.symm = e := by
ext
rfl
#align alg_equiv.symm_symm AlgEquiv.symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (symm : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
#align alg_equiv.symm_bijective AlgEquiv.symm_bijective
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe' (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, e, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = e.symm :=
symm_bijective.injective <| ext fun _ => rfl
#align alg_equiv.mk_coe' AlgEquiv.mk_coe'
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm =
{(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm with
toFun := f'
invFun := f } :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.symm_mk AlgEquiv.symm_mk
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm : (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).symm = AlgEquiv.refl :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.refl_symm AlgEquiv.refl_symm
--this should be a simp lemma but causes a lint timeout
theorem toRingEquiv_symm (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) : (f : A₁ ≃+* A₁).symm = f.symm :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.to_ring_equiv_symm AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_toRingEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃+* A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂).symm :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.symm_to_ring_equiv AlgEquiv.symm_toRingEquiv
/-- Algebra equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₃ :=
{ e₁.toRingEquiv.trans e₂.toRingEquiv with
commutes' := fun r => show e₂.toFun (e₁.toFun _) = _ by rw [e₁.commutes', e₂.commutes'] }
#align alg_equiv.trans AlgEquiv.trans
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply
#align alg_equiv.apply_symm_apply AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply
#align alg_equiv.symm_apply_apply AlgEquiv.symm_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).symm x = e₁.symm (e₂.symm x) :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.symm_trans_apply AlgEquiv.symm_trans_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : ⇑(e₁.trans e₂) = e₂ ∘ e₁ :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.coe_trans AlgEquiv.coe_trans
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₁) : (e₁.trans e₂) x = e₂ (e₁ x) :=
rfl
#align alg_equiv.trans_apply AlgEquiv.trans_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ↑e.symm = AlgHom.id R A₂ := by
ext
simp
#align alg_equiv.comp_symm AlgEquiv.comp_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_comp (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp ↑e.symm (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) = AlgHom.id R A₁ := by
ext
simp
#align alg_equiv.symm_comp AlgEquiv.symm_comp
theorem leftInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e :=
e.left_inv
#align alg_equiv.left_inverse_symm AlgEquiv.leftInverse_symm
theorem rightInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e :=
e.right_inv
#align alg_equiv.right_inverse_symm AlgEquiv.rightInverse_symm
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₁'` and `A₂` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂'`. -/
@[simps apply]
def arrowCongr (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ≃ (A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂') where
toFun f := (e₂.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.symm.toAlgHom
invFun f := (e₂.symm.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.toAlgHom
left_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, symm_comp]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, symm_comp, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
right_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, comp_symm]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, comp_symm, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
#align alg_equiv.arrow_congr AlgEquiv.arrowCongr
theorem arrowCongr_comp (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₃ : A₃ ≃ₐ[R] A₃') (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₃) :
arrowCongr e₁ e₃ (g.comp f) = (arrowCongr e₂ e₃ g).comp (arrowCongr e₁ e₂ f) := by
ext
simp only [arrowCongr, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, AlgHom.comp_apply]
congr
exact (e₂.symm_apply_apply _).symm
#align alg_equiv.arrow_congr_comp AlgEquiv.arrowCongr_comp
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_refl : arrowCongr AlgEquiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl = Equiv.refl (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) := by
ext
rfl
#align alg_equiv.arrow_congr_refl AlgEquiv.arrowCongr_refl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Equiv.lean | 470 | 474 | theorem arrowCongr_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₁' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (e₂' : A₂' ≃ₐ[R] A₃') :
arrowCongr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr e₂ e₂') := by |
ext
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Holder
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.MetricSeparated
#align_import measure_theory.measure.hausdorff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d5c4a7a5fb0d982f97ed953161264f1dbd90ead"
/-!
# Hausdorff measure and metric (outer) measures
In this file we define the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure on an (extended) metric space `X` and
the Hausdorff dimension of a set in an (extended) metric space. Let `μ d δ` be the maximal outer
measure such that `μ d δ s ≤ (EMetric.diam s) ^ d` for every set of diameter less than `δ`. Then
the Hausdorff measure `μH[d] s` of `s` is defined as `⨆ δ > 0, μ d δ s`. By Caratheodory theorem
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`, this is a Borel measure on `X`.
The value of `μH[d]`, `d > 0`, on a set `s` (measurable or not) is given by
```
μH[d] s = ⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : 0 < r), ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n)
(ht : ∀ n, EMetric.diam (t n) ≤ r), ∑' n, EMetric.diam (t n) ^ d
```
For every set `s` for any `d < d'` we have either `μH[d] s = ∞` or `μH[d'] s = 0`, see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top`. In
`Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDimension` we use this fact to define the Hausdorff dimension
`dimH` of a set in an (extended) metric space.
We also define two generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. In one generalization (see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`) we take any function `m (diam s)` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. In
an even more general definition (see `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'`) we use any function
of `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`. Some authors start with a partial function `m` defined only on some sets
`s : Set X` (e.g., only on balls or only on measurable sets). This is equivalent to our definition
applied to `MeasureTheory.extend m`.
We also define a predicate `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric` which says that an outer measure
is additive on metric separated pairs of sets: `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` provided that
`⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), edist x y ≠ 0`. This is the property required for the Caratheodory theorem
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`, so we prove this theorem for any
metric outer measure, then prove that outer measures constructed using `mkMetric'` are metric outer
measures.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric`: an outer measure `μ` is called *metric* if
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` for any two metric separated sets `s` and `t`. A metric outer measure in a
Borel extended metric space is guaranteed to satisfy the Caratheodory condition, see
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`.
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` and its particular case
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric`: a construction of an outer measure that is guaranteed to
be metric. Both constructions are generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. The same measures
interpreted as Borel measures are called `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'` and
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure` a.k.a. `μH[d]`: the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure.
There are many definitions of the Hausdorff measure that differ from each other by a
multiplicative constant. We put
`μH[d] s = ⨆ r > 0, ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (ht : ∀ n, EMetric.diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ (ht : ¬Set.Subsingleton (t n)), (EMetric.diam (t n)) ^ d`,
see `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_apply`. In the most interesting case `0 < d` one
can omit the `⨆ (ht : ¬Set.Subsingleton (t n))` part.
## Main statements
### Basic properties
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`: if `μ` is a metric outer measure
on an extended metric space `X` (that is, it is additive on pairs of metric separated sets), then
every Borel set is Caratheodory measurable (hence, `μ` defines an actual
`MeasureTheory.Measure`). See also `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_mono`: `μH[d] s` is an antitone function
of `d`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top`: if `d₁ < d₂`, then for any `s`, either
`μH[d₂] s = 0` or `μH[d₁] s = ∞`. Together with the previous lemma, this means that `μH[d] s` is
equal to infinity on some ray `(-∞, D)` and is equal to zero on `(D, +∞)`, where `D` is a possibly
infinite number called the *Hausdorff dimension* of `s`; `μH[D] s` can be zero, infinity, or
anything in between.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.noAtoms_hausdorff`: Hausdorff measure has no atoms.
### Hausdorff measure in `ℝⁿ`
* `MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_pi_real`: for a nonempty `ι`, `μH[card ι]` on `ι → ℝ` equals
Lebesgue measure.
## Notations
We use the following notation localized in `MeasureTheory`.
- `μH[d]` : `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d`
## Implementation notes
There are a few similar constructions called the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure. E.g., some
sources only allow coverings by balls and use `r ^ d` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. While these
construction lead to different Hausdorff measures, they lead to the same notion of the Hausdorff
dimension.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.10][Federer1996]
## Tags
Hausdorff measure, measure, metric measure
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open EMetric Set Function Filter Encodable FiniteDimensional TopologicalSpace
noncomputable section
variable {ι X Y : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] [EMetricSpace Y]
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
/-!
### Metric outer measures
In this section we define metric outer measures and prove Caratheodory theorem: a metric outer
measure has the Caratheodory property.
-/
/-- We say that an outer measure `μ` in an (e)metric space is *metric* if `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`
for any two metric separated sets `s`, `t`. -/
def IsMetric (μ : OuterMeasure X) : Prop :=
∀ s t : Set X, IsMetricSeparated s t → μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric
namespace IsMetric
variable {μ : OuterMeasure X}
/-- A metric outer measure is additive on a finite set of pairwise metric separated sets. -/
theorem finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated (hm : IsMetric μ) {I : Finset ι} {s : ι → Set X}
(hI : ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ j ∈ I, i ≠ j → IsMetricSeparated (s i) (s j)) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) = ∑ i ∈ I, μ (s i) := by
classical
induction' I using Finset.induction_on with i I hiI ihI hI
· simp
simp only [Finset.mem_insert] at hI
rw [Finset.set_biUnion_insert, hm, ihI, Finset.sum_insert hiI]
exacts [fun i hi j hj hij => hI i (Or.inr hi) j (Or.inr hj) hij,
IsMetricSeparated.finset_iUnion_right fun j hj =>
hI i (Or.inl rfl) j (Or.inr hj) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hiI).symm]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.finset_Union_of_pairwise_separated MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated
/-- Caratheodory theorem. If `m` is a metric outer measure, then every Borel measurable set `t` is
Caratheodory measurable: for any (not necessarily measurable) set `s` we have
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s`. -/
theorem borel_le_caratheodory (hm : IsMetric μ) : borel X ≤ μ.caratheodory := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_isClosed]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => μ.isCaratheodory_iff_le.2 fun s => ?_
set S : ℕ → Set X := fun n => {x ∈ s | (↑n)⁻¹ ≤ infEdist x t}
have Ssep (n) : IsMetricSeparated (S n) t :=
⟨n⁻¹, ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _),
fun x hx y hy ↦ hx.2.trans <| infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy⟩
have Ssep' : ∀ n, IsMetricSeparated (S n) (s ∩ t) := fun n =>
(Ssep n).mono Subset.rfl inter_subset_right
have S_sub : ∀ n, S n ⊆ s \ t := fun n =>
subset_inter inter_subset_left (Ssep n).subset_compl_right
have hSs : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s := fun n =>
calc
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) = μ (s ∩ t ∪ S n) := Eq.symm <| hm _ _ <| (Ssep' n).symm
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t ∪ s \ t) := μ.mono <| union_subset_union_right _ <| S_sub n
_ = μ s := by rw [inter_union_diff]
have iUnion_S : ⋃ n, S n = s \ t := by
refine Subset.antisymm (iUnion_subset S_sub) ?_
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht] at hxt
rcases ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt hxt with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, hxs, hn.le⟩
/- Now we have `∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s` and we need to prove
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ s`. We can't pass to the limit because
`μ` is only an outer measure. -/
by_cases htop : μ (s \ t) = ∞
· rw [htop, add_top, ← htop]
exact μ.mono diff_subset
suffices μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ ⨆ n, μ (S n) by calc
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) := by rw [iUnion_S]
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + ⨆ n, μ (S n) := by gcongr
_ = ⨆ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) := ENNReal.add_iSup
_ ≤ μ s := iSup_le hSs
/- It suffices to show that `∑' k, μ (S (k + 1) \ S k) ≠ ∞`. Indeed, if we have this,
then for all `N` we have `μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ (S N) + ∑' k, m (S (N + k + 1) \ S (N + k))`
and the second term tends to zero, see `OuterMeasure.iUnion_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top`
for details. -/
have : ∀ n, S n ⊆ S (n + 1) := fun n x hx =>
⟨hx.1, le_trans (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.2 <| Nat.cast_le.2 n.le_succ) hx.2⟩
classical -- Porting note: Added this to get the next tactic to work
refine (μ.iUnion_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top this ?_).le; clear this
/- While the sets `S (k + 1) \ S k` are not pairwise metric separated, the sets in each
subsequence `S (2 * k + 1) \ S (2 * k)` and `S (2 * k + 2) \ S (2 * k)` are metric separated,
so `m` is additive on each of those sequences. -/
rw [← tsum_even_add_odd ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable, ENNReal.add_ne_top]
suffices ∀ a, (∑' k : ℕ, μ (S (2 * k + 1 + a) \ S (2 * k + a))) ≠ ∞ from
⟨by simpa using this 0, by simpa using this 1⟩
refine fun r => ne_top_of_le_ne_top htop ?_
rw [← iUnion_S, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, iSup_le_iff]
intro n
rw [← hm.finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated]
· exact μ.mono (iUnion_subset fun i => iUnion_subset fun _ x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨_, hx.1⟩)
suffices ∀ i j, i < j → IsMetricSeparated (S (2 * i + 1 + r)) (s \ S (2 * j + r)) from
fun i _ j _ hij => hij.lt_or_lt.elim
(fun h => (this i j h).mono inter_subset_left fun x hx => by exact ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩)
fun h => (this j i h).symm.mono (fun x hx => by exact ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩) inter_subset_left
intro i j hj
have A : ((↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) < (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ := by
rw [ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, Nat.cast_lt]; omega
refine ⟨(↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ - (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹, by simpa [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le] using A,
fun x hx y hy => ?_⟩
have : infEdist y t < (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹ := not_le.1 fun hle => hy.2 ⟨hy.1, hle⟩
rcases infEdist_lt_iff.mp this with ⟨z, hzt, hyz⟩
have hxz : (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ ≤ edist x z := le_infEdist.1 hx.2 _ hzt
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right hyz.ne_top
refine le_trans ?_ (edist_triangle _ _ _)
refine (add_le_add le_rfl hyz.le).trans (Eq.trans_le ?_ hxz)
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le A.le]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.borel_le_caratheodory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory
theorem le_caratheodory [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (hm : IsMetric μ) :
‹MeasurableSpace X› ≤ μ.caratheodory := by
rw [BorelSpace.measurable_eq (α := X)]
exact hm.borel_le_caratheodory
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.le_caratheodory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.le_caratheodory
end IsMetric
/-!
### Constructors of metric outer measures
In this section we provide constructors `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` and
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric` and prove that these outer measures are metric outer
measures. We also prove basic lemmas about `map`/`comap` of these measures.
-/
/-- Auxiliary definition for `OuterMeasure.mkMetric'`: given a function on sets
`m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, returns the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s`
for any set `s` of diameter at most `r`. -/
def mkMetric'.pre (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
boundedBy <| extend fun s (_ : diam s ≤ r) => m s
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.pre MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.pre
/-- Given a function `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, `mkMetric' m` is the supremum of `mkMetric'.pre m r`
over `r > 0`. Equivalently, it is the limit of `mkMetric'.pre m r` as `r` tends to zero from
the right. -/
def mkMetric' (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
⨆ r > 0, mkMetric'.pre m r
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric' MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'
/-- Given a function `m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞` and `r > 0`, let `μ r` be the maximal outer measure such that
`μ s ≤ m (EMetric.diam s)` whenever `EMetric.diam s < r`. Then `mkMetric m = ⨆ r > 0, μ r`. -/
def mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
mkMetric' fun s => m (diam s)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric
namespace mkMetric'
variable {m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞} {r : ℝ≥0∞} {μ : OuterMeasure X} {s : Set X}
theorem le_pre : μ ≤ pre m r ↔ ∀ s : Set X, diam s ≤ r → μ s ≤ m s := by
simp only [pre, le_boundedBy, extend, le_iInf_iff]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.le_pre MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.le_pre
theorem pre_le (hs : diam s ≤ r) : pre m r s ≤ m s :=
(boundedBy_le _).trans <| iInf_le _ hs
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.pre_le MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.pre_le
theorem mono_pre (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) {r r' : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r ≤ r') : pre m r' ≤ pre m r :=
le_pre.2 fun _ hs => pre_le (hs.trans h)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.mono_pre MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.mono_pre
theorem mono_pre_nat (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : Monotone fun k : ℕ => pre m k⁻¹ :=
fun k l h => le_pre.2 fun s hs => pre_le (hs.trans <| by simpa)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.mono_pre_nat MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.mono_pre_nat
theorem tendsto_pre (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set X) :
Tendsto (fun r => pre m r s) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 <| mkMetric' m s) := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff]
simp only [mkMetric', OuterMeasure.iSup_apply, iSup_subtype']
exact tendsto_atBot_iSup fun r r' hr => mono_pre _ hr _
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.tendsto_pre MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.tendsto_pre
theorem tendsto_pre_nat (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set X) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => pre m n⁻¹ s) atTop (𝓝 <| mkMetric' m s) := by
refine (tendsto_pre m s).comp (tendsto_inf.2 ⟨ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero, ?_⟩)
refine tendsto_principal.2 (eventually_of_forall fun n => ?_)
simp
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.tendsto_pre_nat MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.tendsto_pre_nat
theorem eq_iSup_nat (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : mkMetric' m = ⨆ n : ℕ, mkMetric'.pre m n⁻¹ := by
ext1 s
rw [iSup_apply]
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre_nat m s)
(tendsto_atTop_iSup fun k l hkl => mkMetric'.mono_pre_nat m hkl s)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.eq_supr_nat MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.eq_iSup_nat
/-- `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.pre m r` is a trimmed measure provided that
`m (closure s) = m s` for any set `s`. -/
theorem trim_pre [MeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞)
(hcl : ∀ s, m (closure s) = m s) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : (pre m r).trim = pre m r := by
refine le_antisymm (le_pre.2 fun s hs => ?_) (le_trim _)
rw [trim_eq_iInf]
refine iInf_le_of_le (closure s) <| iInf_le_of_le subset_closure <|
iInf_le_of_le measurableSet_closure ((pre_le ?_).trans_eq (hcl _))
rwa [diam_closure]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.trim_pre MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.trim_pre
end mkMetric'
/-- An outer measure constructed using `OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` is a metric outer measure. -/
theorem mkMetric'_isMetric (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : (mkMetric' m).IsMetric := by
rintro s t ⟨r, r0, hr⟩
refine tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventuallyEq
(mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ _) ((mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ _).add (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ _)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero] at r0
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, r0⟩]
rintro ε ⟨_, εr⟩
refine boundedBy_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter ?_
rintro u ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hyt, hyu⟩
have : ε < diam u := εr.trans_le ((hr x hxs y hyt).trans <| edist_le_diam_of_mem hxu hyu)
exact iInf_eq_top.2 fun h => (this.not_le h).elim
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'_is_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'_isMetric
/-- If `c ∉ {0, ∞}` and `m₁ d ≤ c * m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0`
(we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then `mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono_smul {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (h0 : c ≠ 0)
(hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] c • m₂) : (mkMetric m₁ : OuterMeasure X) ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ := by
classical
rcases (mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' zero_lt_one).1 hle with ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩
refine fun s =>
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ s)
(ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ s) (Or.inr hc))
(mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, hr0⟩) fun r' hr' => ?_)
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mkMetric'.pre, RingHom.id_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← smul_apply, smul_boundedBy hc]
refine le_boundedBy.2 (fun t => (boundedBy_le _).trans ?_) _
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.smul_apply, extend, iInf_eq_if]
split_ifs with ht
· apply hr
exact ⟨zero_le _, ht.trans_lt hr'.2⟩
· simp [h0]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric_mono_smul MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric_mono_smul
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric_top : (mkMetric (fun _ => ∞ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X) = ⊤ := by
simp_rw [mkMetric, mkMetric', mkMetric'.pre, extend_top, boundedBy_top, eq_top_iff]
rw [le_iSup_iff]
intro b hb
simpa using hb ⊤
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric_top MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric_top
/-- If `m₁ d ≤ m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0` (we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then
`mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] m₂) :
(mkMetric m₁ : OuterMeasure X) ≤ mkMetric m₂ := by
convert @mkMetric_mono_smul X _ _ m₂ _ ENNReal.one_ne_top one_ne_zero _ <;> simp [*]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric_mono MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric_mono
theorem isometry_comap_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {f : X → Y} (hf : Isometry f)
(H : Monotone m ∨ Surjective f) : comap f (mkMetric m) = mkMetric m := by
simp only [mkMetric, mkMetric', mkMetric'.pre, inducedOuterMeasure, comap_iSup]
refine surjective_id.iSup_congr id fun ε => surjective_id.iSup_congr id fun hε => ?_
rw [comap_boundedBy _ (H.imp _ id)]
· congr with s : 1
apply extend_congr
· simp [hf.ediam_image]
· intros; simp [hf.injective.subsingleton_image_iff, hf.ediam_image]
· intro h_mono s t hst
simp only [extend, le_iInf_iff]
intro ht
apply le_trans _ (h_mono (diam_mono hst))
simp only [(diam_mono hst).trans ht, le_refl, ciInf_pos]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.isometry_comap_mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isometry_comap_mkMetric
theorem mkMetric_smul (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hc' : c ≠ 0) :
(mkMetric (c • m) : OuterMeasure X) = c • mkMetric m := by
simp only [mkMetric, mkMetric', mkMetric'.pre, inducedOuterMeasure, ENNReal.smul_iSup]
simp_rw [smul_iSup, smul_boundedBy hc, smul_extend _ hc', Pi.smul_apply]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric_smul MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric_smul
theorem mkMetric_nnreal_smul (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {c : ℝ≥0} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(mkMetric (c • m) : OuterMeasure X) = c • mkMetric m := by
rw [ENNReal.smul_def, ENNReal.smul_def,
mkMetric_smul m ENNReal.coe_ne_top (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr hc)]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric_nnreal_smul MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric_nnreal_smul
theorem isometry_map_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {f : X → Y} (hf : Isometry f)
(H : Monotone m ∨ Surjective f) : map f (mkMetric m) = restrict (range f) (mkMetric m) := by
rw [← isometry_comap_mkMetric _ hf H, map_comap]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.isometry_map_mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isometry_map_mkMetric
theorem isometryEquiv_comap_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (f : X ≃ᵢ Y) :
comap f (mkMetric m) = mkMetric m :=
isometry_comap_mkMetric _ f.isometry (Or.inr f.surjective)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.isometry_equiv_comap_mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isometryEquiv_comap_mkMetric
theorem isometryEquiv_map_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (f : X ≃ᵢ Y) :
map f (mkMetric m) = mkMetric m := by
rw [← isometryEquiv_comap_mkMetric _ f, map_comap_of_surjective f.surjective]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.isometry_equiv_map_mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isometryEquiv_map_mkMetric
theorem trim_mkMetric [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mkMetric m : OuterMeasure X).trim = mkMetric m := by
simp only [mkMetric, mkMetric'.eq_iSup_nat, trim_iSup]
congr 1 with n : 1
refine mkMetric'.trim_pre _ (fun s => ?_) _
simp
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.trim_mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.trim_mkMetric
theorem le_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : OuterMeasure X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (h0 : 0 < r)
(hr : ∀ s, diam s ≤ r → μ s ≤ m (diam s)) : μ ≤ mkMetric m :=
le_iSup₂_of_le r h0 <| mkMetric'.le_pre.2 fun _ hs => hr _ hs
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.le_mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.le_mkMetric
end OuterMeasure
/-!
### Metric measures
In this section we use `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure` and theorems about
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'`/`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric` to define
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'`/`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`. We also restate some lemmas
about metric outer measures for metric measures.
-/
namespace Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
/-- Given a function `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, `mkMetric' m` is the supremum of `μ r`
over `r > 0`, where `μ r` is the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s`
for all `s`. While each `μ r` is an *outer* measure, the supremum is a measure. -/
def mkMetric' (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure X :=
(OuterMeasure.mkMetric' m).toMeasure (OuterMeasure.mkMetric'_isMetric _).le_caratheodory
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric' MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'
/-- Given a function `m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞`, `mkMetric m` is the supremum of `μ r` over `r > 0`, where
`μ r` is the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s` for all sets `s` that contain at least
two points. While each `mkMetric'.pre` is an *outer* measure, the supremum is a measure. -/
def mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure X :=
(OuterMeasure.mkMetric m).toMeasure (OuterMeasure.mkMetric'_isMetric _).le_caratheodory
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric'_toOuterMeasure (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mkMetric' m).toOuterMeasure = (OuterMeasure.mkMetric' m).trim :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric'_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric_toOuterMeasure (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mkMetric m : Measure X).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.mkMetric m :=
OuterMeasure.trim_mkMetric m
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric_toOuterMeasure
end Measure
theorem OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
⇑(OuterMeasure.mkMetric m : OuterMeasure X) = Measure.mkMetric m := by
rw [← Measure.mkMetric_toOuterMeasure, Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.coe_mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric
namespace Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
/-- If `c ∉ {0, ∞}` and `m₁ d ≤ c * m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0`
(we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then `mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono_smul {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (h0 : c ≠ 0)
(hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] c • m₂) : (mkMetric m₁ : Measure X) ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ := fun s ↦ by
rw [← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric, coe_smul, ← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric]
exact OuterMeasure.mkMetric_mono_smul hc h0 hle s
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric_mono_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric_mono_smul
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric_top : (mkMetric (fun _ => ∞ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure X) = ⊤ := by
apply toOuterMeasure_injective
rw [mkMetric_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.mkMetric_top, toOuterMeasure_top]
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric_top MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric_top
/-- If `m₁ d ≤ m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0` (we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then
`mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] m₂) :
(mkMetric m₁ : Measure X) ≤ mkMetric m₂ := by
convert @mkMetric_mono_smul X _ _ _ _ m₂ _ ENNReal.one_ne_top one_ne_zero _ <;> simp [*]
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric_mono
/-- A formula for `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`. -/
theorem mkMetric_apply (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set X) :
mkMetric m s =
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (_ : 0 < r),
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (_ : s ⊆ iUnion t) (_ : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, m (diam (t n)) := by
classical
-- We mostly unfold the definitions but we need to switch the order of `∑'` and `⨅`
simp only [← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric, OuterMeasure.mkMetric, OuterMeasure.mkMetric',
OuterMeasure.iSup_apply, OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.pre, OuterMeasure.boundedBy_apply, extend]
refine
surjective_id.iSup_congr (fun r => r) fun r =>
iSup_congr_Prop Iff.rfl fun _ =>
surjective_id.iInf_congr _ fun t => iInf_congr_Prop Iff.rfl fun ht => ?_
dsimp
by_cases htr : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r
· rw [iInf_eq_if, if_pos htr]
congr 1 with n : 1
simp only [iInf_eq_if, htr n, id, if_true, iSup_and']
· rw [iInf_eq_if, if_neg htr]
push_neg at htr; rcases htr with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨n, ?_⟩
rw [iSup_eq_if, if_pos, iInf_eq_if, if_neg]
· exact hn.not_le
rcases diam_pos_iff.1 ((zero_le r).trans_lt hn) with ⟨x, hx, -⟩
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric_apply
theorem le_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure X) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (h₀ : 0 < ε)
(h : ∀ s : Set X, diam s ≤ ε → μ s ≤ m (diam s)) : μ ≤ mkMetric m := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_le, mkMetric_toOuterMeasure]
exact OuterMeasure.le_mkMetric m μ.toOuterMeasure ε h₀ h
#align measure_theory.measure.le_mk_metric MeasureTheory.Measure.le_mkMetric
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure (or, more generally, for a measure defined using
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`) of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending to
`0`, indexed by any sequence of countable types. -/
theorem mkMetric_le_liminf_tsum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [∀ n, Countable (ι n)] (s : Set X)
{l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
mkMetric m s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑' i, m (diam (t n i))) l := by
haveI : ∀ n, Encodable (ι n) := fun n => Encodable.ofCountable _
simp only [mkMetric_apply]
refine iSup₂_le fun ε hε => ?_
refine le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun c hc => ?_
rcases ((frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt (by isBoundedDefault) hc).and_eventually
((hr.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hε)).and (ht.and hst))).exists with
⟨n, hn, hrn, htn, hstn⟩
set u : ℕ → Set X := fun j => ⋃ b ∈ decode₂ (ι n) j, t n b
refine iInf₂_le_of_le u (by rwa [iUnion_decode₂]) ?_
refine iInf_le_of_le (fun j => ?_) ?_
· rw [EMetric.diam_iUnion_mem_option]
exact iSup₂_le fun _ _ => (htn _).trans hrn.le
· calc
(∑' j : ℕ, ⨆ _ : (u j).Nonempty, m (diam (u j))) = _ :=
tsum_iUnion_decode₂ (fun t : Set X => ⨆ _ : t.Nonempty, m (diam t)) (by simp) _
_ ≤ ∑' i : ι n, m (diam (t n i)) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun b => iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl
_ ≤ c := hn.le
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric_le_liminf_tsum MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric_le_liminf_tsum
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure (or, more generally, for a measure defined using
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`) of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending to
`0`, indexed by any sequence of finite types. -/
theorem mkMetric_le_liminf_sum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [hι : ∀ n, Fintype (ι n)] (s : Set X)
{l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
mkMetric m s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑ i, m (diam (t n i))) l := by
simpa only [tsum_fintype] using mkMetric_le_liminf_tsum s r hr t ht hst m
#align measure_theory.measure.mk_metric_le_liminf_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric_le_liminf_sum
/-!
### Hausdorff measure and Hausdorff dimension
-/
/-- Hausdorff measure on an (e)metric space. -/
def hausdorffMeasure (d : ℝ) : Measure X :=
mkMetric fun r => r ^ d
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure
scoped[MeasureTheory] notation "μH[" d "]" => MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d
theorem le_hausdorffMeasure (d : ℝ) (μ : Measure X) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (h₀ : 0 < ε)
(h : ∀ s : Set X, diam s ≤ ε → μ s ≤ diam s ^ d) : μ ≤ μH[d] :=
le_mkMetric _ μ ε h₀ h
#align measure_theory.measure.le_hausdorff_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.le_hausdorffMeasure
/-- A formula for `μH[d] s`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_apply (d : ℝ) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] s =
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (_ : 0 < r),
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (_ : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, diam (t n) ^ d :=
mkMetric_apply _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_apply
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending
to `0`, indexed by any sequence of countable types. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_tsum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [∀ n, Countable (ι n)]
(d : ℝ) (s : Set X) {l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0))
(t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X) (ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n)
(hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) : μH[d] s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑' i, diam (t n i) ^ d) l :=
mkMetric_le_liminf_tsum s r hr t ht hst _
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_le_liminf_tsum MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_tsum
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending
to `0`, indexed by any sequence of finite types. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_sum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [∀ n, Fintype (ι n)]
(d : ℝ) (s : Set X) {l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0))
(t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X) (ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n)
(hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) : μH[d] s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑ i, diam (t n i) ^ d) l :=
mkMetric_le_liminf_sum s r hr t ht hst _
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_le_liminf_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_sum
/-- If `d₁ < d₂`, then for any set `s` we have either `μH[d₂] s = 0`, or `μH[d₁] s = ∞`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top {d₁ d₂ : ℝ} (h : d₁ < d₂) (s : Set X) :
μH[d₂] s = 0 ∨ μH[d₁] s = ∞ := by
by_contra! H
suffices ∀ c : ℝ≥0, c ≠ 0 → μH[d₂] s ≤ c * μH[d₁] s by
rcases ENNReal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt H.2 H.1 with ⟨c, hc0, hc⟩
exact hc.not_le (this c (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hc0))
intro c hc
refine le_iff'.1 (mkMetric_mono_smul ENNReal.coe_ne_top (mod_cast hc) ?_) s
have : 0 < ((c : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (d₂ - d₁)⁻¹) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hc, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero,
NNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff]
exact mt And.left hc
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici ⟨le_rfl, this⟩]
rintro r ⟨hr₀, hrc⟩
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hrc
rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul,
← ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inr ENNReal.coe_ne_top) (Or.inr <| mt ENNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 hc)]
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr₀)
· rcases lt_or_le 0 d₂ with (h₂ | h₂)
· simp only [h₂, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_le, ENNReal.zero_div, ENNReal.coe_zero]
· simp only [h.trans_le h₂, ENNReal.div_top, zero_le, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_neg,
ENNReal.coe_zero]
· have : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using hr₀
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_sub _ _ this ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
refine (ENNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hrc (sub_pos.2 h)).le.trans ?_
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel (sub_pos.2 h).ne', ENNReal.rpow_one]
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_zero_or_top MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top
/-- Hausdorff measure `μH[d] s` is monotone in `d`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_mono {d₁ d₂ : ℝ} (h : d₁ ≤ d₂) (s : Set X) : μH[d₂] s ≤ μH[d₁] s := by
rcases h.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h); · exact le_rfl
cases' hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top h s with hs hs
· rw [hs]; exact zero_le _
· rw [hs]; exact le_top
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_mono
variable (X)
theorem noAtoms_hausdorff {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 < d) : NoAtoms (hausdorffMeasure d : Measure X) := by
refine ⟨fun x => ?_⟩
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, hausdorffMeasure_apply]
refine iSup₂_le fun ε _ => iInf₂_le_of_le (fun _ => {x}) ?_ <| iInf_le_of_le (fun _ => ?_) ?_
· exact subset_iUnion (fun _ => {x} : ℕ → Set X) 0
· simp only [EMetric.diam_singleton, zero_le]
· simp [hd]
#align measure_theory.measure.no_atoms_hausdorff MeasureTheory.Measure.noAtoms_hausdorff
variable {X}
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton (x : X) : μH[0] ({x} : Set X) = 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· let r : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞ := fun _ => 0
let t : ℕ → Unit → Set X := fun _ _ => {x}
have ht : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n := by
simp only [t, r, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, diam_singleton, eventually_atTop,
nonpos_iff_eq_zero, exists_const]
simpa [t, liminf_const] using hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_sum 0 {x} r tendsto_const_nhds t ht
· rw [hausdorffMeasure_apply]
suffices
(1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (_ : {x} ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (_ : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ 1),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, diam (t n) ^ (0 : ℝ) by
apply le_trans this _
convert le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) (1 : ℝ≥0∞) zero_lt_one
rfl
simp only [ENNReal.rpow_zero, le_iInf_iff]
intro t hst _
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hst (mem_singleton x)) with ⟨m, hm⟩
have A : (t m).Nonempty := ⟨x, hm⟩
calc
(1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨆ h : (t m).Nonempty, 1 := by simp only [A, ciSup_pos]
_ ≤ ∑' n, ⨆ h : (t n).Nonempty, 1 := ENNReal.le_tsum _
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_zero_singleton MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton
theorem one_le_hausdorffMeasure_zero_of_nonempty {s : Set X} (h : s.Nonempty) : 1 ≤ μH[0] s := by
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
calc
(1 : ℝ≥0∞) = μH[0] ({x} : Set X) := (hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton x).symm
_ ≤ μH[0] s := measure_mono (singleton_subset_iff.2 hx)
#align measure_theory.measure.one_le_hausdorff_measure_zero_of_nonempty MeasureTheory.Measure.one_le_hausdorffMeasure_zero_of_nonempty
theorem hausdorffMeasure_le_one_of_subsingleton {s : Set X} (hs : s.Subsingleton) {d : ℝ}
(hd : 0 ≤ d) : μH[d] s ≤ 1 := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
· simp only [measure_empty, zero_le]
· rw [(subsingleton_iff_singleton hx).1 hs]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with (rfl | dpos)
· simp only [le_refl, hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton]
· haveI := noAtoms_hausdorff X dpos
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton]
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_le_one_of_subsingleton MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_le_one_of_subsingleton
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
/-!
### Hausdorff measure, Hausdorff dimension, and Hölder or Lipschitz continuous maps
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y] [BorelSpace Y]
namespace HolderOnWith
variable {C r : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s t : Set X}
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous on `s` with a positive exponent `r`, then
`μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ C ^ d * μH[r * d] s`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image_le (h : HolderOnWith C r f s) (hr : 0 < r) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[r * d] s := by
-- We start with the trivial case `C = 0`
rcases (zero_le C).eq_or_lt with (rfl | hC0)
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
· simp only [measure_empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_zero, image_empty]
have : f '' s = {f x} :=
have : (f '' s).Subsingleton := by simpa [diam_eq_zero_iff] using h.ediam_image_le
(subsingleton_iff_singleton (mem_image_of_mem f hx)).1 this
rw [this]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with (rfl | h'd)
· simp only [ENNReal.rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_zero]
rw [hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton]
exact one_le_hausdorffMeasure_zero_of_nonempty ⟨x, hx⟩
· haveI := noAtoms_hausdorff Y h'd
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton]
-- Now assume `C ≠ 0`
· have hCd0 : (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ 0 := by simp [hC0.ne']
have hCd : (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ ∞ := by simp [hd]
simp only [hausdorffMeasure_apply, ENNReal.mul_iSup, ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne hCd0 hCd,
← ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
refine iSup_le fun R => iSup_le fun hR => ?_
have : Tendsto (fun d : ℝ≥0∞ => (C : ℝ≥0∞) * d ^ (r : ℝ)) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_const_mul_rpow_nhds_zero_of_pos ENNReal.coe_ne_top hr
rcases ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic.eventually_iff.1 (this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hR)) with
⟨δ, δ0, H⟩
refine le_iSup₂_of_le δ δ0 <| iInf₂_mono' fun t hst ↦
⟨fun n => f '' (t n ∩ s), ?_, iInf_mono' fun htδ ↦
⟨fun n => (h.ediam_image_inter_le (t n)).trans (H (htδ n)).le, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← image_iUnion, ← iUnion_inter]
exact image_subset _ (subset_inter hst Subset.rfl)
· refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_
simp only [iSup_le_iff, image_nonempty]
intro hft
simp only [Nonempty.mono ((t n).inter_subset_left) hft, ciSup_pos]
rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul, ← ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hd]
exact ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow (h.ediam_image_inter_le _) hd
#align holder_on_with.hausdorff_measure_image_le HolderOnWith.hausdorffMeasure_image_le
end HolderOnWith
namespace LipschitzOnWith
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s t : Set X}
/-- If `f : X → Y` is `K`-Lipschitz on `s`, then `μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] s`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image_le (h : LipschitzOnWith K f s) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] s := by
simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using h.holderOnWith.hausdorffMeasure_image_le zero_lt_one hd
#align lipschitz_on_with.hausdorff_measure_image_le LipschitzOnWith.hausdorffMeasure_image_le
end LipschitzOnWith
namespace LipschitzWith
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y}
/-- If `f` is a `K`-Lipschitz map, then it increases the Hausdorff `d`-measures of sets at most
by the factor of `K ^ d`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] s :=
(h.lipschitzOnWith s).hausdorffMeasure_image_le hd
#align lipschitz_with.hausdorff_measure_image_le LipschitzWith.hausdorffMeasure_image_le
end LipschitzWith
open scoped Pointwise
theorem MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_smul₀ {𝕜 E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d)
{r : 𝕜} (hr : r ≠ 0) (s : Set E) : μH[d] (r • s) = ‖r‖₊ ^ d • μH[d] s := by
suffices ∀ {r : 𝕜}, r ≠ 0 → ∀ s : Set E, μH[d] (r • s) ≤ ‖r‖₊ ^ d • μH[d] s by
refine le_antisymm (this hr s) ?_
rw [← le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos]
· dsimp
rw [← NNReal.inv_rpow, ← nnnorm_inv]
· refine Eq.trans_le ?_ (this (inv_ne_zero hr) (r • s))
rw [inv_smul_smul₀ hr]
· simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hr]
intro r _ s
simp only [NNReal.rpow_eq_pow, ENNReal.smul_def, ← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hd, smul_eq_mul]
exact (lipschitzWith_smul (β := E) r).hausdorffMeasure_image_le hd s
#align measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_smul₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_smul₀
/-!
### Antilipschitz maps do not decrease Hausdorff measures and dimension
-/
namespace AntilipschitzWith
variable {f : X → Y} {K : ℝ≥0} {d : ℝ}
theorem hausdorffMeasure_preimage_le (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : Set Y) :
μH[d] (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] s := by
rcases eq_or_ne K 0 with (rfl | h0)
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (f ⁻¹' s) with (hs | ⟨x, hx⟩)
· simp only [hs, measure_empty, zero_le]
have : f ⁻¹' s = {x} := by
haveI : Subsingleton X := hf.subsingleton
have : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := subsingleton_univ.anti (subset_univ _)
exact (subsingleton_iff_singleton hx).1 this
rw [this]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with (rfl | h'd)
· simp only [ENNReal.rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_zero]
rw [hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton]
exact one_le_hausdorffMeasure_zero_of_nonempty ⟨f x, hx⟩
· haveI := noAtoms_hausdorff X h'd
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton]
have hKd0 : (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ 0 := by simp [h0]
have hKd : (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ ∞ := by simp [hd]
simp only [hausdorffMeasure_apply, ENNReal.mul_iSup, ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne hKd0 hKd,
← ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
refine iSup₂_le fun ε ε0 => ?_
refine le_iSup₂_of_le (ε / K) (by simp [ε0.ne']) ?_
refine le_iInf₂ fun t hst => le_iInf fun htε => ?_
replace hst : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ _ := preimage_mono hst; rw [preimage_iUnion] at hst
refine iInf₂_le_of_le _ hst (iInf_le_of_le (fun n => ?_) ?_)
· exact (hf.ediam_preimage_le _).trans (ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div' <| htε n)
· refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => iSup_le_iff.2 fun hft => ?_
simp only [nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hft, ciSup_pos]
rw [← ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hd]
exact ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow (hf.ediam_preimage_le _) hd
#align antilipschitz_with.hausdorff_measure_preimage_le AntilipschitzWith.hausdorffMeasure_preimage_le
theorem le_hausdorffMeasure_image (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] s ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] (f '' s) :=
calc
μH[d] s ≤ μH[d] (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := measure_mono (subset_preimage_image _ _)
_ ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] (f '' s) := hf.hausdorffMeasure_preimage_le hd (f '' s)
#align antilipschitz_with.le_hausdorff_measure_image AntilipschitzWith.le_hausdorffMeasure_image
end AntilipschitzWith
/-!
### Isometries preserve the Hausdorff measure and Hausdorff dimension
-/
namespace Isometry
variable {f : X → Y} {d : ℝ}
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image (hf : Isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective f) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] (f '' s) = μH[d] s := by
simp only [hausdorffMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric, ← OuterMeasure.comap_apply]
rw [OuterMeasure.isometry_comap_mkMetric _ hf (hd.imp_left _)]
exact ENNReal.monotone_rpow_of_nonneg
#align isometry.hausdorff_measure_image Isometry.hausdorffMeasure_image
theorem hausdorffMeasure_preimage (hf : Isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective f) (s : Set Y) :
μH[d] (f ⁻¹' s) = μH[d] (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [← hf.hausdorffMeasure_image hd, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
#align isometry.hausdorff_measure_preimage Isometry.hausdorffMeasure_preimage
theorem map_hausdorffMeasure (hf : Isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective f) :
Measure.map f μH[d] = μH[d].restrict (range f) := by
ext1 s hs
rw [map_apply hf.continuous.measurable hs, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
hf.hausdorffMeasure_preimage hd]
#align isometry.map_hausdorff_measure Isometry.map_hausdorffMeasure
end Isometry
namespace IsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) (s : Set X) : μH[d] (e '' s) = μH[d] s :=
e.isometry.hausdorffMeasure_image (Or.inr e.surjective) s
#align isometry_equiv.hausdorff_measure_image IsometryEquiv.hausdorffMeasure_image
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_preimage (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) (s : Set Y) : μH[d] (e ⁻¹' s) = μH[d] s := by
rw [← e.image_symm, e.symm.hausdorffMeasure_image]
#align isometry_equiv.hausdorff_measure_preimage IsometryEquiv.hausdorffMeasure_preimage
@[simp]
theorem map_hausdorffMeasure (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) : Measure.map e μH[d] = μH[d] := by
rw [e.isometry.map_hausdorffMeasure (Or.inr e.surjective), e.surjective.range_eq, restrict_univ]
#align isometry_equiv.map_hausdorff_measure IsometryEquiv.map_hausdorffMeasure
theorem measurePreserving_hausdorffMeasure (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) : MeasurePreserving e μH[d] μH[d] :=
⟨e.continuous.measurable, map_hausdorffMeasure _ _⟩
#align isometry_equiv.measure_preserving_hausdorff_measure IsometryEquiv.measurePreserving_hausdorffMeasure
end IsometryEquiv
namespace MeasureTheory
@[to_additive]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_smul {α : Type*} [SMul α X] [IsometricSMul α X] {d : ℝ} (c : α)
(h : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective (c • · : X → X)) (s : Set X) : μH[d] (c • s) = μH[d] s :=
(isometry_smul X c).hausdorffMeasure_image h _
#align measure_theory.hausdorff_measure_smul MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_smul
#align measure_theory.hausdorff_measure_vadd MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_vadd
@[to_additive]
instance {d : ℝ} [Group X] [IsometricSMul X X] : IsMulLeftInvariant (μH[d] : Measure X) where
map_mul_left_eq_self x := (IsometryEquiv.constSMul x).map_hausdorffMeasure _
@[to_additive]
instance {d : ℝ} [Group X] [IsometricSMul Xᵐᵒᵖ X] : IsMulRightInvariant (μH[d] : Measure X) where
map_mul_right_eq_self x := (IsometryEquiv.constSMul (MulOpposite.op x)).map_hausdorffMeasure _
/-!
### Hausdorff measure and Lebesgue measure
-/
/-- In the space `ι → ℝ`, the Hausdorff measure coincides exactly with the Lebesgue measure. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_pi_real {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] :
(μH[Fintype.card ι] : Measure (ι → ℝ)) = volume := by
classical
-- it suffices to check that the two measures coincide on products of rational intervals
refine (pi_eq_generateFrom (fun _ => Real.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioo_rat.symm)
(fun _ => Real.isPiSystem_Ioo_rat) (fun _ => Real.finiteSpanningSetsInIooRat _) ?_).symm
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff]
-- fix such a product `s` of rational intervals, of the form `Π (a i, b i)`.
intro s hs
choose a b H using hs
obtain rfl : s = fun i => Ioo (α := ℝ) (a i) (b i) := funext fun i => (H i).2
replace H := fun i => (H i).1
apply le_antisymm _
-- first check that `volume s ≤ μH s`
· have Hle : volume ≤ (μH[Fintype.card ι] : Measure (ι → ℝ)) := by
refine le_hausdorffMeasure _ _ ∞ ENNReal.coe_lt_top fun s _ => ?_
rw [ENNReal.rpow_natCast]
exact Real.volume_pi_le_diam_pow s
rw [← volume_pi_pi fun i => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)]
exact Measure.le_iff'.1 Hle _
/- For the other inequality `μH s ≤ volume s`, we use a covering of `s` by sets of small diameter
`1/n`, namely cubes with left-most point of the form `a i + f i / n` with `f i` ranging between
`0` and `⌈(b i - a i) * n⌉`. Their number is asymptotic to `n^d * Π (b i - a i)`. -/
have I : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (b i : ℝ) - a i := fun i => by
simpa only [sub_nonneg, Rat.cast_le] using (H i).le
let γ := fun n : ℕ => ∀ i : ι, Fin ⌈((b i : ℝ) - a i) * n⌉₊
let t : ∀ n : ℕ, γ n → Set (ι → ℝ) := fun n f =>
Set.pi univ fun i => Icc (a i + f i / n) (a i + (f i + 1) / n)
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℝ≥0∞)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [one_div, ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero]
have B : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ i : γ n, diam (t n i) ≤ 1 / n := by
refine eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, fun n hn => ?_⟩
intro f
refine diam_pi_le_of_le fun b => ?_
simp only [Real.ediam_Icc, add_div, ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn), le_refl,
add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, add_sub_cancel_left, ENNReal.ofReal_one, ENNReal.ofReal_natCast]
have C : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, (Set.pi univ fun i : ι => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) ⊆ ⋃ i : γ n, t n i := by
refine eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, fun n hn => ?_⟩
have npos : (0 : ℝ) < n := Nat.cast_pos.2 hn
intro x hx
simp only [mem_Ioo, mem_univ_pi] at hx
simp only [t, mem_iUnion, mem_Ioo, mem_univ_pi]
let f : γ n := fun i =>
⟨⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊, by
apply Nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos
· refine (mul_lt_mul_right npos).2 ?_
simp only [(hx i).right, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· refine mul_pos ?_ npos
simpa only [Rat.cast_lt, sub_pos] using H i⟩
refine ⟨f, fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· calc
(a i : ℝ) + ⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊ / n ≤ (a i : ℝ) + (x i - a i) * n / n := by
gcongr
exact Nat.floor_le (mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 (hx i).1.le) npos.le)
_ = x i := by field_simp [npos.ne']
· calc
x i = (a i : ℝ) + (x i - a i) * n / n := by field_simp [npos.ne']
_ ≤ (a i : ℝ) + (⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊ + 1) / n := by
gcongr
exact (Nat.lt_floor_add_one _).le
calc
μH[Fintype.card ι] (Set.pi univ fun i : ι => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) ≤
liminf (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i : γ n, diam (t n i) ^ ((Fintype.card ι) : ℝ)) atTop :=
hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_sum _ (Set.pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i))
(fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℝ≥0∞)) A t B C
_ ≤ liminf (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i : γ n, (1 / (n : ℝ≥0∞)) ^ Fintype.card ι) atTop := by
refine liminf_le_liminf ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [B] with _ hn
apply Finset.sum_le_sum fun i _ => _
simp only [ENNReal.rpow_natCast]
intros i _
exact pow_le_pow_left' (hn i) _
· isBoundedDefault
_ = liminf (fun n : ℕ => ∏ i : ι, (⌈((b i : ℝ) - a i) * n⌉₊ : ℝ≥0∞) / n) atTop := by
simp only [γ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.cast_prod, one_mul, Fintype.card_fin, Finset.sum_const,
nsmul_eq_mul, Fintype.card_pi, div_eq_mul_inv, Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const]
_ = ∏ i : ι, volume (Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) := by
simp only [Real.volume_Ioo]
apply Tendsto.liminf_eq
refine ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top _ (fun i _ => ?_) fun i _ => ?_
· apply
Tendsto.congr' _
((ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp
((tendsto_nat_ceil_mul_div_atTop (I i)).comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop))
apply eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, fun n hn => _⟩
intros n hn
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn), comp_apply,
ENNReal.ofReal_natCast]
· simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align measure_theory.hausdorff_measure_pi_real MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_pi_real
variable (ι X)
theorem hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_funUnique [Unique ι]
[SecondCountableTopology X] (d : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.funUnique ι X) μH[d] μH[d] :=
(IsometryEquiv.funUnique ι X).measurePreserving_hausdorffMeasure _
#align measure_theory.hausdorff_measure_measure_preserving_fun_unique MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_funUnique
theorem hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_piFinTwo (α : Fin 2 → Type*)
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, EMetricSpace (α i)] [∀ i, BorelSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, SecondCountableTopology (α i)] (d : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piFinTwo α) μH[d] μH[d] :=
(IsometryEquiv.piFinTwo α).measurePreserving_hausdorffMeasure _
#align measure_theory.hausdorff_measure_measure_preserving_pi_fin_two MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_piFinTwo
/-- In the space `ℝ`, the Hausdorff measure coincides exactly with the Lebesgue measure. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Hausdorff.lean | 1,046 | 1,049 | theorem hausdorffMeasure_real : (μH[1] : Measure ℝ) = volume := by |
rw [← (volume_preserving_funUnique Unit ℝ).map_eq,
← (hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_funUnique Unit ℝ 1).map_eq,
← hausdorffMeasure_pi_real, Fintype.card_unit, Nat.cast_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.adj_matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
/-!
# Adjacency Matrices
This module defines the adjacency matrix of a graph, and provides theorems connecting graph
properties to computational properties of the matrix.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix`: `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`.
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.to_graph`: for `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : A.IsAdjMatrix`,
`h.to_graph` is the simple graph induced by `A`.
* `Matrix.compl`: for `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be
the adjacency matrix of the complement graph of the graph induced by `A`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix`: the adjacency matrix of a `SimpleGraph`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk`: each entry of the `n`th power of
a graph's adjacency matrix counts the number of length-`n` walks between the corresponding
pair of vertices.
-/
open Matrix
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph
variable {V α β : Type*}
namespace Matrix
/-- `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`. -/
structure IsAdjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] (A : Matrix V V α) : Prop where
zero_or_one : ∀ i j, A i j = 0 ∨ A i j = 1 := by aesop
symm : A.IsSymm := by aesop
apply_diag : ∀ i, A i i = 0 := by aesop
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix Matrix.IsAdjMatrix
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A : Matrix V V α}
@[simp]
theorem apply_diag_ne [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i : V) :
¬A i i = 1 := by simp [h.apply_diag i]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_diag_ne Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_diag_ne
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_one_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 1 ↔ A i j = 0 := by obtain h | h := h.zero_or_one i j <;> simp [h]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_ne_one_iff Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_ne_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_zero_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 0 ↔ A i j = 1 := by rw [← apply_ne_one_iff h, Classical.not_not]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_ne_zero_iff Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_ne_zero_iff
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : IsAdjMatrix A`,
`h.toGraph` is the simple graph whose adjacency matrix is `A`. -/
@[simps]
def toGraph [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj i j := A i j = 1
symm i j hij := by simp only; rwa [h.symm.apply i j]
loopless i := by simp [h]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.to_graph Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.toGraph
instance [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
DecidableRel h.toGraph.Adj := by
simp only [toGraph]
infer_instance
end IsAdjMatrix
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be the adjacency matrix of
the complement graph of the graph induced by `A.adjMatrix`. -/
def compl [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α) : Matrix V V α :=
fun i j => ite (i = j) 0 (ite (A i j = 0) 1 0)
#align matrix.compl Matrix.compl
section Compl
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α)
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply_diag [Zero α] [One α] (i : V) : A.compl i i = 0 := by simp [compl]
#align matrix.compl_apply_diag Matrix.compl_apply_diag
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply [Zero α] [One α] (i j : V) : A.compl i j = 0 ∨ A.compl i j = 1 := by
unfold compl
split_ifs <;> simp
#align matrix.compl_apply Matrix.compl_apply
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : A.compl.IsSymm := by
ext
simp [compl, h.apply, eq_comm]
#align matrix.is_symm_compl Matrix.isSymm_compl
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
{ symm := by simp [h] }
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix_compl Matrix.isAdjMatrix_compl
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A}
@[simp]
theorem compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
isAdjMatrix_compl A h.symm
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.compl Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.compl
theorem toGraph_compl_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
h.compl.toGraph = h.toGraphᶜ := by
ext v w
cases' h.zero_or_one v w with h h <;> by_cases hvw : v = w <;> simp [Matrix.compl, h, hvw]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.to_graph_compl_eq Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.toGraph_compl_eq
end IsAdjMatrix
end Compl
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
variable (α)
/-- `adjMatrix G α` is the matrix `A` such that `A i j = (1 : α)` if `i` and `j` are
adjacent in the simple graph `G`, and otherwise `A i j = 0`. -/
def adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : Matrix V V α :=
of fun i j => if G.Adj i j then (1 : α) else 0
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix SimpleGraph.adjMatrix
variable {α}
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `adjMatrix`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_apply (v w : V) [Zero α] [One α] :
G.adjMatrix α v w = if G.Adj v w then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_apply
@[simp]
theorem transpose_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α)ᵀ = G.adjMatrix α := by
ext
simp [adj_comm]
#align simple_graph.transpose_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.transpose_adjMatrix
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsSymm :=
transpose_adjMatrix G
#align simple_graph.is_symm_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.isSymm_adjMatrix
variable (α)
/-- The adjacency matrix of `G` is an adjacency matrix. -/
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsAdjMatrix :=
{ zero_or_one := fun i j => by by_cases h : G.Adj i j <;> simp [h] }
#align simple_graph.is_adj_matrix_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix
/-- The graph induced by the adjacency matrix of `G` is `G` itself. -/
theorem toGraph_adjMatrix_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] :
(G.isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix α).toGraph = G := by
ext
simp only [IsAdjMatrix.toGraph_adj, adjMatrix_apply, ite_eq_left_iff, zero_ne_one]
apply Classical.not_not
#align simple_graph.to_graph_adj_matrix_eq SimpleGraph.toGraph_adjMatrix_eq
variable {α} [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_dotProduct [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct (G.adjMatrix α v) vec = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_dot_product SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_dotProduct
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_adjMatrix [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct vec (G.adjMatrix α v) = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter, Finset.sum_apply]
#align simple_graph.dot_product_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.dotProduct_adjMatrix
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
(G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ vec) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
rw [mulVec, adjMatrix_dotProduct]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_mul_vec_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_mulVec_apply
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_vecMul_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
(vec ᵥ* G.adjMatrix α) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp only [← dotProduct_adjMatrix, vecMul]
refine congr rfl ?_; ext x
rw [← transpose_apply (adjMatrix α G) x v, transpose_adjMatrix]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_vec_mul_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_vecMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_mul_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix V V α) (v w : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α * M) v w = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, M u w := by
simp [mul_apply, neighborFinset_eq_filter, sum_filter]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_mul_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_mul_apply
@[simp]
theorem mul_adjMatrix_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix V V α) (v w : V) :
(M * G.adjMatrix α) v w = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset w, M v u := by
simp [mul_apply, neighborFinset_eq_filter, sum_filter, adj_comm]
#align simple_graph.mul_adj_matrix_apply SimpleGraph.mul_adjMatrix_apply
variable (α)
@[simp]
theorem trace_adjMatrix [AddCommMonoid α] [One α] : Matrix.trace (G.adjMatrix α) = 0 := by
simp [Matrix.trace]
#align simple_graph.trace_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.trace_adjMatrix
variable {α}
theorem adjMatrix_mul_self_apply_self [NonAssocSemiring α] (i : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α * G.adjMatrix α) i i = degree G i := by simp [filter_true_of_mem]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_mul_self_apply_self SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_mul_self_apply_self
variable {G}
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_const_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] {a : α} {v : V} :
(G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ Function.const _ a) v = G.degree v * a := by simp
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_mul_vec_const_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_mulVec_const_apply
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_const_apply_of_regular [NonAssocSemiring α] {d : ℕ} {a : α}
(hd : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) {v : V} : (G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ Function.const _ a) v = d * a := by
simp [hd v]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_mul_vec_const_apply_of_regular SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_mulVec_const_apply_of_regular
theorem adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk [DecidableEq V] [Semiring α] (n : ℕ) (u v : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α ^ n) u v = Fintype.card { p : G.Walk u v | p.length = n } := by
rw [card_set_walk_length_eq]
induction' n with n ih generalizing u v
· obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne u v <;> simp [finsetWalkLength, *]
· simp only [pow_succ', finsetWalkLength, ih, adjMatrix_mul_apply]
rw [Finset.card_biUnion]
· norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_sum, card_map, neighborFinset_def]
apply Finset.sum_toFinset_eq_subtype
-- Disjointness for card_bUnion
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ - ⟨y, hy⟩ - hxy
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
intro p hp
simp only [inf_eq_inter, mem_inter, mem_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, exists_prop] at hp;
obtain ⟨⟨px, _, rfl⟩, ⟨py, hpy, hp⟩⟩ := hp
cases hp
simp at hxy
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk
/-- The sum of the identity, the adjacency matrix, and its complement is the all-ones matrix. -/
theorem one_add_adjMatrix_add_compl_adjMatrix_eq_allOnes [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq α]
[NonAssocSemiring α] : 1 + G.adjMatrix α + (G.adjMatrix α).compl = Matrix.of fun _ _ ↦ 1 := by
ext i j
unfold Matrix.compl
rw [of_apply, add_apply, adjMatrix_apply, add_apply, adjMatrix_apply, one_apply]
by_cases h : G.Adj i j
· aesop
· rw [if_neg h]
by_cases heq : i = j
· repeat rw [if_pos heq, add_zero]
· rw [if_neg heq, if_neg heq, zero_add, zero_add, if_pos (refl 0)]
theorem dotProduct_mulVec_adjMatrix [NonAssocSemiring α] (x y : V → α) :
x ⬝ᵥ (G.adjMatrix α).mulVec y = ∑ i : V, ∑ j : V, if G.Adj i j then x i * y j else 0 := by
simp only [dotProduct, mulVec, adjMatrix_apply, ite_mul, one_mul, zero_mul, mul_sum, mul_ite,
mul_zero]
end SimpleGraph
namespace Matrix.IsAdjMatrix
variable [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α]
variable {A : Matrix V V α} (h : IsAdjMatrix A)
/-- If `A` is qualified as an adjacency matrix,
then the adjacency matrix of the graph induced by `A` is itself. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/AdjMatrix.lean | 307 | 309 | theorem adjMatrix_toGraph_eq [DecidableEq α] : h.toGraph.adjMatrix α = A := by |
ext i j
obtain h' | h' := h.zero_or_one i j <;> simp [h']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
#align_import data.complex.exponential from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a8b2226cfb0a79f5986492053fc49b1a0c6aeffb"
/-!
# Exponential, trigonometric and hyperbolic trigonometric functions
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential, sine, cosine, tangent,
hyperbolic sine, hyperbolic cosine, and hyperbolic tangent functions.
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped Classical ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_abs_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq _root_.abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, abs (z ^ m / m.factorial) :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt (abs z)
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (abs.nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (abs z / n) (div_nonneg (abs.nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_abs, abs_abs, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul, ← div_div,
mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
#align complex.is_cau_abs_exp Complex.isCauSeq_abs_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_abs_exp z).of_abv
#align complex.is_cau_exp Complex.isCauSeq_exp
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ Complex.abs :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
#align complex.exp' Complex.exp'
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
-- Porting note: removed `irreducible` attribute, so I can prove things
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
#align complex.exp Complex.exp
/-- The complex sine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def sin (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
#align complex.sin Complex.sin
/-- The complex cosine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def cos (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
#align complex.cos Complex.cos
/-- The complex tangent function, defined as `sin z / cos z` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def tan (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
sin z / cos z
#align complex.tan Complex.tan
/-- The complex cotangent function, defined as `cos z / sin z` -/
def cot (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cos z / sin z
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def sinh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
#align complex.sinh Complex.sinh
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def cosh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
#align complex.cosh Complex.cosh
/-- The complex hyperbolic tangent function, defined as `sinh z / cosh z` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def tanh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
sinh z / cosh z
#align complex.tanh Complex.tanh
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
#align real.exp Real.exp
/-- The real sine function, defined as the real part of the complex sine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def sin (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(sin x).re
#align real.sin Real.sin
/-- The real cosine function, defined as the real part of the complex cosine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def cos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cos x).re
#align real.cos Real.cos
/-- The real tangent function, defined as the real part of the complex tangent -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def tan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(tan x).re
#align real.tan Real.tan
/-- The real cotangent function, defined as the real part of the complex cotangent -/
nonrec def cot (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cot x).re
/-- The real hypebolic sine function, defined as the real part of the complex hyperbolic sine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def sinh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(sinh x).re
#align real.sinh Real.sinh
/-- The real hypebolic cosine function, defined as the real part of the complex hyperbolic cosine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def cosh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cosh x).re
#align real.cosh Real.cosh
/-- The real hypebolic tangent function, defined as the real part of
the complex hyperbolic tangent -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def tanh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(tanh x).re
#align real.tanh Real.tanh
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- Porting note: ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
cases' j with j j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
#align complex.exp_zero Complex.exp_zero
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_abs_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
#align complex.exp_add Complex.exp_add
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp (Multiplicative.toAdd z),
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
#align complex.exp_list_sum Complex.exp_list_sum
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
#align complex.exp_multiset_sum Complex.exp_multiset_sum
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
#align complex.exp_sum Complex.exp_sum
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
#align complex.exp_nat_mul Complex.exp_nat_mul
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_self x, exp_add, h]; simp
#align complex.exp_ne_zero Complex.exp_ne_zero
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel (exp_ne_zero x)]
#align complex.exp_neg Complex.exp_neg
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align complex.exp_sub Complex.exp_sub
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
#align complex.exp_int_mul Complex.exp_int_mul
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.exp_conj Complex.exp_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_exp_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_exp_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_exp Complex.ofReal_exp
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.exp_of_real_im Complex.exp_ofReal_im
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
#align complex.exp_of_real_re Complex.exp_ofReal_re
theorem two_sinh : 2 * sinh x = exp x - exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_sinh Complex.two_sinh
theorem two_cosh : 2 * cosh x = exp x + exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_cosh Complex.two_cosh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_zero : sinh 0 = 0 := by simp [sinh]
#align complex.sinh_zero Complex.sinh_zero
@[simp]
theorem sinh_neg : sinh (-x) = -sinh x := by simp [sinh, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
#align complex.sinh_neg Complex.sinh_neg
private theorem sinh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a - b) * (c + d) + (a + b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c - b * d) := by ring
theorem sinh_add : sinh (x + y) = sinh x * cosh y + cosh x * sinh y := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_sinh, exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm, mul_add, ←
mul_assoc, two_sinh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh, ← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_cosh]
exact sinh_add_aux
#align complex.sinh_add Complex.sinh_add
@[simp]
theorem cosh_zero : cosh 0 = 1 := by simp [cosh]
#align complex.cosh_zero Complex.cosh_zero
@[simp]
theorem cosh_neg : cosh (-x) = cosh x := by simp [add_comm, cosh, exp_neg]
#align complex.cosh_neg Complex.cosh_neg
private theorem cosh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) + (a - b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
theorem cosh_add : cosh (x + y) = cosh x * cosh y + sinh x * sinh y := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_cosh, exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm, mul_add, ←
mul_assoc, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_sinh, ← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh]
exact cosh_add_aux
#align complex.cosh_add Complex.cosh_add
theorem sinh_sub : sinh (x - y) = sinh x * cosh y - cosh x * sinh y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sinh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.sinh_sub Complex.sinh_sub
theorem cosh_sub : cosh (x - y) = cosh x * cosh y - sinh x * sinh y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cosh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.cosh_sub Complex.cosh_sub
theorem sinh_conj : sinh (conj x) = conj (sinh x) := by
rw [sinh, ← RingHom.map_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← RingHom.map_sub, sinh, map_div₀]
-- Porting note: not nice
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align complex.sinh_conj Complex.sinh_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((sinh x).re : ℂ) = sinh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← sinh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_sinh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sinh (x : ℝ) : (Real.sinh x : ℂ) = sinh x :=
ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_sinh Complex.ofReal_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.sinh_of_real_im Complex.sinh_ofReal_im
theorem sinh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).re = Real.sinh x :=
rfl
#align complex.sinh_of_real_re Complex.sinh_ofReal_re
theorem cosh_conj : cosh (conj x) = conj (cosh x) := by
rw [cosh, ← RingHom.map_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← RingHom.map_add, cosh, map_div₀]
-- Porting note: not nice
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align complex.cosh_conj Complex.cosh_conj
theorem ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((cosh x).re : ℂ) = cosh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← cosh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_cosh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_cosh (x : ℝ) : (Real.cosh x : ℂ) = cosh x :=
ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_cosh Complex.ofReal_cosh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.cosh_of_real_im Complex.cosh_ofReal_im
@[simp]
theorem cosh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).re = Real.cosh x :=
rfl
#align complex.cosh_of_real_re Complex.cosh_ofReal_re
theorem tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh : tanh x = sinh x / cosh x :=
rfl
#align complex.tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh Complex.tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh
@[simp]
theorem tanh_zero : tanh 0 = 0 := by simp [tanh]
#align complex.tanh_zero Complex.tanh_zero
@[simp]
theorem tanh_neg : tanh (-x) = -tanh x := by simp [tanh, neg_div]
#align complex.tanh_neg Complex.tanh_neg
theorem tanh_conj : tanh (conj x) = conj (tanh x) := by
rw [tanh, sinh_conj, cosh_conj, ← map_div₀, tanh]
#align complex.tanh_conj Complex.tanh_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((tanh x).re : ℂ) = tanh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← tanh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_tanh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_tanh (x : ℝ) : (Real.tanh x : ℂ) = tanh x :=
ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_tanh Complex.ofReal_tanh
@[simp]
theorem tanh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.tanh_of_real_im Complex.tanh_ofReal_im
theorem tanh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).re = Real.tanh x :=
rfl
#align complex.tanh_of_real_re Complex.tanh_ofReal_re
@[simp]
theorem cosh_add_sinh : cosh x + sinh x = exp x := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add, two_cosh, two_sinh, add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
#align complex.cosh_add_sinh Complex.cosh_add_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_add_cosh : sinh x + cosh x = exp x := by rw [add_comm, cosh_add_sinh]
#align complex.sinh_add_cosh Complex.sinh_add_cosh
@[simp]
theorem exp_sub_cosh : exp x - cosh x = sinh x :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (sinh_add_cosh x).symm
#align complex.exp_sub_cosh Complex.exp_sub_cosh
@[simp]
theorem exp_sub_sinh : exp x - sinh x = cosh x :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (cosh_add_sinh x).symm
#align complex.exp_sub_sinh Complex.exp_sub_sinh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_sub_sinh : cosh x - sinh x = exp (-x) := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_sub, two_cosh, two_sinh, add_sub_sub_cancel, two_mul]
#align complex.cosh_sub_sinh Complex.cosh_sub_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_sub_cosh : sinh x - cosh x = -exp (-x) := by rw [← neg_sub, cosh_sub_sinh]
#align complex.sinh_sub_cosh Complex.sinh_sub_cosh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq : cosh x ^ 2 - sinh x ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [sq_sub_sq, cosh_add_sinh, cosh_sub_sinh, ← exp_add, add_neg_self, exp_zero]
#align complex.cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq Complex.cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq
theorem cosh_sq : cosh x ^ 2 = sinh x ^ 2 + 1 := by
rw [← cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq x]
ring
#align complex.cosh_sq Complex.cosh_sq
theorem sinh_sq : sinh x ^ 2 = cosh x ^ 2 - 1 := by
rw [← cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq x]
ring
#align complex.sinh_sq Complex.sinh_sq
theorem cosh_two_mul : cosh (2 * x) = cosh x ^ 2 + sinh x ^ 2 := by rw [two_mul, cosh_add, sq, sq]
#align complex.cosh_two_mul Complex.cosh_two_mul
theorem sinh_two_mul : sinh (2 * x) = 2 * sinh x * cosh x := by
rw [two_mul, sinh_add]
ring
#align complex.sinh_two_mul Complex.sinh_two_mul
theorem cosh_three_mul : cosh (3 * x) = 4 * cosh x ^ 3 - 3 * cosh x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, cosh_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cosh_two_mul, sinh_two_mul]
have h2 : sinh x * (2 * sinh x * cosh x) = 2 * cosh x * sinh x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, sinh_sq]
ring
#align complex.cosh_three_mul Complex.cosh_three_mul
theorem sinh_three_mul : sinh (3 * x) = 4 * sinh x ^ 3 + 3 * sinh x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, sinh_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cosh_two_mul, sinh_two_mul]
have h2 : cosh x * (2 * sinh x * cosh x) = 2 * sinh x * cosh x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, cosh_sq]
ring
#align complex.sinh_three_mul Complex.sinh_three_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin 0 = 0 := by simp [sin]
#align complex.sin_zero Complex.sin_zero
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg : sin (-x) = -sin x := by
simp [sin, sub_eq_add_neg, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
#align complex.sin_neg Complex.sin_neg
theorem two_sin : 2 * sin x = (exp (-x * I) - exp (x * I)) * I :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_sin Complex.two_sin
theorem two_cos : 2 * cos x = exp (x * I) + exp (-x * I) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_cos Complex.two_cos
theorem sinh_mul_I : sinh (x * I) = sin x * I := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_sinh, ← mul_assoc, two_sin, mul_assoc, I_mul_I,
mul_neg_one, neg_sub, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sinh_mul_I Complex.sinh_mul_I
theorem cosh_mul_I : cosh (x * I) = cos x := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_cosh, two_cos, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cosh_mul_I Complex.cosh_mul_I
theorem tanh_mul_I : tanh (x * I) = tan x * I := by
rw [tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh, cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_div_right_comm, tan]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.tanh_mul_I Complex.tanh_mul_I
theorem cos_mul_I : cos (x * I) = cosh x := by rw [← cosh_mul_I]; ring_nf; simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_mul_I Complex.cos_mul_I
theorem sin_mul_I : sin (x * I) = sinh x * I := by
have h : I * sin (x * I) = -sinh x := by
rw [mul_comm, ← sinh_mul_I]
ring_nf
simp
rw [← neg_neg (sinh x), ← h]
apply Complex.ext <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sin_mul_I Complex.sin_mul_I
theorem tan_mul_I : tan (x * I) = tanh x * I := by
rw [tan, sin_mul_I, cos_mul_I, mul_div_right_comm, tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.tan_mul_I Complex.tan_mul_I
theorem sin_add : sin (x + y) = sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y := by
rw [← mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I, add_mul, add_mul, mul_right_comm, ← sinh_mul_I,
mul_assoc, ← sinh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, sinh_add]
#align complex.sin_add Complex.sin_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos 0 = 1 := by simp [cos]
#align complex.cos_zero Complex.cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg : cos (-x) = cos x := by simp [cos, sub_eq_add_neg, exp_neg, add_comm]
#align complex.cos_neg Complex.cos_neg
private theorem cos_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) - (b - a) * (d - c) * -1 = 2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
theorem cos_add : cos (x + y) = cos x * cos y - sin x * sin y := by
rw [← cosh_mul_I, add_mul, cosh_add, cosh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I,
mul_mul_mul_comm, I_mul_I, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.cos_add Complex.cos_add
theorem sin_sub : sin (x - y) = sin x * cos y - cos x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align complex.sin_sub Complex.sin_sub
theorem cos_sub : cos (x - y) = cos x * cos y + sin x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align complex.cos_sub Complex.cos_sub
theorem sin_add_mul_I (x y : ℂ) : sin (x + y * I) = sin x * cosh y + cos x * sinh y * I := by
rw [sin_add, cos_mul_I, sin_mul_I, mul_assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sin_add_mul_I Complex.sin_add_mul_I
theorem sin_eq (z : ℂ) : sin z = sin z.re * cosh z.im + cos z.re * sinh z.im * I := by
convert sin_add_mul_I z.re z.im; exact (re_add_im z).symm
#align complex.sin_eq Complex.sin_eq
theorem cos_add_mul_I (x y : ℂ) : cos (x + y * I) = cos x * cosh y - sin x * sinh y * I := by
rw [cos_add, cos_mul_I, sin_mul_I, mul_assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_add_mul_I Complex.cos_add_mul_I
theorem cos_eq (z : ℂ) : cos z = cos z.re * cosh z.im - sin z.re * sinh z.im * I := by
convert cos_add_mul_I z.re z.im; exact (re_add_im z).symm
#align complex.cos_eq Complex.cos_eq
theorem sin_sub_sin : sin x - sin y = 2 * sin ((x - y) / 2) * cos ((x + y) / 2) := by
have s1 := sin_add ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
have s2 := sin_sub ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel_right, half_add_self] at s1
rw [div_sub_div_same, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, half_add_self] at s2
rw [s1, s2]
ring
#align complex.sin_sub_sin Complex.sin_sub_sin
theorem cos_sub_cos : cos x - cos y = -2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) := by
have s1 := cos_add ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
have s2 := cos_sub ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel_right, half_add_self] at s1
rw [div_sub_div_same, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, half_add_self] at s2
rw [s1, s2]
ring
#align complex.cos_sub_cos Complex.cos_sub_cos
theorem sin_add_sin : sin x + sin y = 2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := by
simpa using sin_sub_sin x (-y)
theorem cos_add_cos : cos x + cos y = 2 * cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := by
calc
cos x + cos y = cos ((x + y) / 2 + (x - y) / 2) + cos ((x + y) / 2 - (x - y) / 2) := ?_
_ =
cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) - sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) +
(cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) + sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2)) :=
?_
_ = 2 * cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := ?_
· congr <;> field_simp
· rw [cos_add, cos_sub]
ring
#align complex.cos_add_cos Complex.cos_add_cos
theorem sin_conj : sin (conj x) = conj (sin x) := by
rw [← mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I, ← conj_neg_I, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_mul,
sinh_conj, mul_neg, sinh_neg, sinh_mul_I, mul_neg]
#align complex.sin_conj Complex.sin_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_sin_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((sin x).re : ℂ) = sin x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← sin_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_sin_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_sin_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sin (x : ℝ) : (Real.sin x : ℂ) = sin x :=
ofReal_sin_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_sin Complex.ofReal_sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (sin x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sin_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.sin_of_real_im Complex.sin_ofReal_im
theorem sin_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (sin x).re = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align complex.sin_of_real_re Complex.sin_ofReal_re
theorem cos_conj : cos (conj x) = conj (cos x) := by
rw [← cosh_mul_I, ← conj_neg_I, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← cosh_mul_I, cosh_conj, mul_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.cos_conj Complex.cos_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_cos_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((cos x).re : ℂ) = cos x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← cos_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_cos_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_cos_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_cos (x : ℝ) : (Real.cos x : ℂ) = cos x :=
ofReal_cos_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_cos Complex.ofReal_cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (cos x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_cos_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.cos_of_real_im Complex.cos_ofReal_im
theorem cos_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (cos x).re = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align complex.cos_of_real_re Complex.cos_ofReal_re
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan 0 = 0 := by simp [tan]
#align complex.tan_zero Complex.tan_zero
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos : tan x = sin x / cos x :=
rfl
#align complex.tan_eq_sin_div_cos Complex.tan_eq_sin_div_cos
theorem tan_mul_cos {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) : tan x * cos x = sin x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hx]
#align complex.tan_mul_cos Complex.tan_mul_cos
@[simp]
theorem tan_neg : tan (-x) = -tan x := by simp [tan, neg_div]
#align complex.tan_neg Complex.tan_neg
theorem tan_conj : tan (conj x) = conj (tan x) := by rw [tan, sin_conj, cos_conj, ← map_div₀, tan]
#align complex.tan_conj Complex.tan_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_tan_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((tan x).re : ℂ) = tan x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← tan_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_tan_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_tan_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_tan (x : ℝ) : (Real.tan x : ℂ) = tan x :=
ofReal_tan_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_tan Complex.ofReal_tan
@[simp]
theorem tan_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (tan x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_tan_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.tan_of_real_im Complex.tan_ofReal_im
theorem tan_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (tan x).re = Real.tan x :=
rfl
#align complex.tan_of_real_re Complex.tan_ofReal_re
theorem cos_add_sin_I : cos x + sin x * I = exp (x * I) := by
rw [← cosh_add_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_add_sin_I Complex.cos_add_sin_I
theorem cos_sub_sin_I : cos x - sin x * I = exp (-x * I) := by
rw [neg_mul, ← cosh_sub_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_sub_sin_I Complex.cos_sub_sin_I
@[simp]
theorem sin_sq_add_cos_sq : sin x ^ 2 + cos x ^ 2 = 1 :=
Eq.trans (by rw [cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_pow, I_sq, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm])
(cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq (x * I))
#align complex.sin_sq_add_cos_sq Complex.sin_sq_add_cos_sq
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq : cos x ^ 2 + sin x ^ 2 = 1 := by rw [add_comm, sin_sq_add_cos_sq]
#align complex.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Complex.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem cos_two_mul' : cos (2 * x) = cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2 := by rw [two_mul, cos_add, ← sq, ← sq]
#align complex.cos_two_mul' Complex.cos_two_mul'
theorem cos_two_mul : cos (2 * x) = 2 * cos x ^ 2 - 1 := by
rw [cos_two_mul', eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 (sin_sq_add_cos_sq x), ← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub,
two_mul]
#align complex.cos_two_mul Complex.cos_two_mul
theorem sin_two_mul : sin (2 * x) = 2 * sin x * cos x := by
rw [two_mul, sin_add, two_mul, add_mul, mul_comm]
#align complex.sin_two_mul Complex.sin_two_mul
theorem cos_sq : cos x ^ 2 = 1 / 2 + cos (2 * x) / 2 := by
simp [cos_two_mul, div_add_div_same, mul_div_cancel_left₀, two_ne_zero, -one_div]
#align complex.cos_sq Complex.cos_sq
theorem cos_sq' : cos x ^ 2 = 1 - sin x ^ 2 := by rw [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, add_sub_cancel_left]
#align complex.cos_sq' Complex.cos_sq'
theorem sin_sq : sin x ^ 2 = 1 - cos x ^ 2 := by rw [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align complex.sin_sq Complex.sin_sq
theorem inv_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) : (1 + tan x ^ 2)⁻¹ = cos x ^ 2 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, div_pow]
field_simp
#align complex.inv_one_add_tan_sq Complex.inv_one_add_tan_sq
theorem tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) :
tan x ^ 2 / (1 + tan x ^ 2) = sin x ^ 2 := by
simp only [← tan_mul_cos hx, mul_pow, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq hx, div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul]
#align complex.tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq Complex.tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq
theorem cos_three_mul : cos (3 * x) = 4 * cos x ^ 3 - 3 * cos x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, cos_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cos_two_mul, sin_two_mul, mul_add, mul_sub, mul_one, sq]
have h2 : 4 * cos x ^ 3 = 2 * cos x * cos x * cos x + 2 * cos x * cos x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, cos_sq']
ring
#align complex.cos_three_mul Complex.cos_three_mul
theorem sin_three_mul : sin (3 * x) = 3 * sin x - 4 * sin x ^ 3 := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, sin_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cos_two_mul, sin_two_mul, cos_sq']
have h2 : cos x * (2 * sin x * cos x) = 2 * sin x * cos x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, cos_sq']
ring
#align complex.sin_three_mul Complex.sin_three_mul
theorem exp_mul_I : exp (x * I) = cos x + sin x * I :=
(cos_add_sin_I _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.exp_mul_I Complex.exp_mul_I
theorem exp_add_mul_I : exp (x + y * I) = exp x * (cos y + sin y * I) := by rw [exp_add, exp_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.exp_add_mul_I Complex.exp_add_mul_I
theorem exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos : exp x = exp x.re * (cos x.im + sin x.im * I) := by
rw [← exp_add_mul_I, re_add_im]
#align complex.exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos Complex.exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos
theorem exp_re : (exp x).re = Real.exp x.re * Real.cos x.im := by
rw [exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos]
simp [exp_ofReal_re, cos_ofReal_re]
#align complex.exp_re Complex.exp_re
theorem exp_im : (exp x).im = Real.exp x.re * Real.sin x.im := by
rw [exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos]
simp [exp_ofReal_re, sin_ofReal_re]
#align complex.exp_im Complex.exp_im
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 794 | 795 | theorem exp_ofReal_mul_I_re (x : ℝ) : (exp (x * I)).re = Real.cos x := by |
simp [exp_mul_I, cos_ofReal_re]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import topology.continuous_on from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file defines relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
and proves their basic properties, including the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
#align nhds_bind_nhds_within nhds_bind_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
#align eventually_nhds_nhds_within eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align eventually_nhds_within_iff eventually_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
#align frequently_nhds_within_iff frequently_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
#align mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
#align eventually_nhds_within_nhds_within eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
#align nhds_within_eq nhdsWithin_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align nhds_within_univ nhdsWithin_univ
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set α} {a : α} (h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s)
(t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
#align nhds_within_has_basis nhdsWithin_hasBasis
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
#align nhds_within_basis_open nhdsWithin_basis_open
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_compl diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_diff diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
#align nhds_of_nhds_within_of_nhds nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually_eq mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
#align nhds_within_eq_iff_eventually_eq nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
#align nhds_within_le_iff nhdsWithin_le_iff
-- Porting note: golfed, dropped an unneeded assumption
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced' preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced'ₓ
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
#align mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
#align self_mem_nhds_within self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
#align eventually_mem_nhds_within eventually_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
#align inter_mem_nhds_within inter_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_mono (a : α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝[t] a :=
inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr h)
#align nhds_within_mono nhdsWithin_mono
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
#align pure_le_nhds_within pure_le_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
#align mem_of_mem_nhds_within mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds_within Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
#align tendsto_const_nhds_within tendsto_const_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
#align nhds_within_restrict'' nhdsWithin_restrict''
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
#align nhds_within_restrict' nhdsWithin_restrict'
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
#align nhds_within_restrict nhdsWithin_restrict
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
#align nhds_within_le_of_mem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
#align nhds_within_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within' nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin'
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds nhdsWithin_eq_nhds
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
#align is_open.nhds_within_eq IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced preimage_nhds_within_coinduced
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
#align nhds_within_empty nhdsWithin_empty
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
#align nhds_within_union nhdsWithin_union
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a :=
Set.Finite.induction_on hI (by simp) fun _ _ hT ↦ by
simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
#align nhds_within_bUnion nhdsWithin_biUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
#align nhds_within_sUnion nhdsWithin_sUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
#align nhds_within_Union nhdsWithin_iUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
#align nhds_within_inter nhdsWithin_inter
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
#align nhds_within_inter' nhdsWithin_inter'
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 271 | 272 | theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by |
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.RCLike
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Hausdorff
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
/-!
# Hausdorff dimension
The Hausdorff dimension of a set `X` in an (extended) metric space is the unique number
`dimH s : ℝ≥0∞` such that for any `d : ℝ≥0` we have
- `μH[d] s = 0` if `dimH s < d`, and
- `μH[d] s = ∞` if `d < dimH s`.
In this file we define `dimH s` to be the Hausdorff dimension of `s`, then prove some basic
properties of Hausdorff dimension.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.dimH`: the Hausdorff dimension of a set. For the Hausdorff dimension of the whole
space we use `MeasureTheory.dimH (Set.univ : Set X)`.
## Main results
### Basic properties of Hausdorff dimension
* `hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH`, `dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top`,
`le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top`, `hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt`, `measure_zero_of_dimH_lt`,
`le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero`, `dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero_ne_top`: various forms
of the characteristic property of the Hausdorff dimension;
* `dimH_union`: the Hausdorff dimension of the union of two sets is the maximum of their Hausdorff
dimensions.
* `dimH_iUnion`, `dimH_bUnion`, `dimH_sUnion`: the Hausdorff dimension of a countable union of sets
is the supremum of their Hausdorff dimensions;
* `dimH_empty`, `dimH_singleton`, `Set.Subsingleton.dimH_zero`, `Set.Countable.dimH_zero` : `dimH s
= 0` whenever `s` is countable;
### (Pre)images under (anti)lipschitz and Hölder continuous maps
* `HolderWith.dimH_image_le` etc: if `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous with exponent `r > 0`, then
for any `s`, `dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r`. We prove versions of this statement for `HolderWith`,
`HolderOnWith`, and locally Hölder maps, as well as for `Set.image` and `Set.range`.
* `LipschitzWith.dimH_image_le` etc: Lipschitz continuous maps do not increase the Hausdorff
dimension of sets.
* for a map that is known to be both Lipschitz and antilipschitz (e.g., for an `Isometry` or
a `ContinuousLinearEquiv`) we also prove `dimH (f '' s) = dimH s`.
### Hausdorff measure in `ℝⁿ`
* `Real.dimH_of_nonempty_interior`: if `s` is a set in a finite dimensional real vector space `E`
with nonempty interior, then the Hausdorff dimension of `s` is equal to the dimension of `E`.
* `dense_compl_of_dimH_lt_finrank`: if `s` is a set in a finite dimensional real vector space `E`
with Hausdorff dimension strictly less than the dimension of `E`, the `s` has a dense complement.
* `ContDiff.dense_compl_range_of_finrank_lt_finrank`: the complement to the range of a `C¹`
smooth map is dense provided that the dimension of the domain is strictly less than the dimension
of the codomain.
## Notations
We use the following notation localized in `MeasureTheory`. It is defined in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Hausdorff`.
- `μH[d]` : `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d`
## Implementation notes
* The definition of `dimH` explicitly uses `borel X` as a measurable space structure. This way we
can formulate lemmas about Hausdorff dimension without assuming that the environment has a
`[MeasurableSpace X]` instance that is equal but possibly not defeq to `borel X`.
Lemma `dimH_def` unfolds this definition using whatever `[MeasurableSpace X]` instance we have in
the environment (as long as it is equal to `borel X`).
* The definition `dimH` is irreducible; use API lemmas or `dimH_def` instead.
## Tags
Hausdorff measure, Hausdorff dimension, dimension
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set TopologicalSpace FiniteDimensional Filter
variable {ι X Y : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] [EMetricSpace Y]
/-- Hausdorff dimension of a set in an (e)metric space. -/
@[irreducible] noncomputable def dimH (s : Set X) : ℝ≥0∞ := by
borelize X; exact ⨆ (d : ℝ≥0) (_ : @hausdorffMeasure X _ _ ⟨rfl⟩ d s = ∞), d
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH dimH
/-!
### Basic properties
-/
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
/-- Unfold the definition of `dimH` using `[MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]` from the
environment. -/
theorem dimH_def (s : Set X) : dimH s = ⨆ (d : ℝ≥0) (_ : μH[d] s = ∞), (d : ℝ≥0∞) := by
borelize X; rw [dimH]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_def dimH_def
theorem hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑d < dimH s) : μH[d] s = ∞ := by
simp only [dimH_def, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨d', hsd', hdd'⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hdd'
exact top_unique (hsd' ▸ hausdorffMeasure_mono hdd'.le _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align hausdorff_measure_of_lt_dimH hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH
theorem dimH_le {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0∞} (H : ∀ d' : ℝ≥0, μH[d'] s = ∞ → ↑d' ≤ d) : dimH s ≤ d :=
(dimH_def s).trans_le <| iSup₂_le H
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_le dimH_le
theorem dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s ≠ ∞) : dimH s ≤ d :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_le_of_hausdorff_measure_ne_top dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top
theorem le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s = ∞) :
↑d ≤ dimH s := by
rw [dimH_def]; exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) d h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align le_dimH_of_hausdorff_measure_eq_top le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top
theorem hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : dimH s < d) : μH[d] s = 0 := by
rw [dimH_def] at h
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 h with ⟨d', hsd', hd'd⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hd'd
exact (hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top hd'd s).resolve_right fun h₂ => hsd'.not_le <|
le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) d' h₂
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align hausdorff_measure_of_dimH_lt hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt
theorem measure_zero_of_dimH_lt {μ : Measure X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μ ≪ μH[d]) {s : Set X}
(hd : dimH s < d) : μ s = 0 :=
h <| hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt hd
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_zero_of_dimH_lt measure_zero_of_dimH_lt
theorem le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s ≠ 0) : ↑d ≤ dimH s :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align le_dimH_of_hausdorff_measure_ne_zero le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero
theorem dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero_ne_top {d : ℝ≥0} {s : Set X} (h : μH[d] s ≠ 0)
(h' : μH[d] s ≠ ∞) : dimH s = d :=
le_antisymm (dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top h') (le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero h)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_of_hausdorff_measure_ne_zero_ne_top dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero_ne_top
end Measurable
@[mono]
theorem dimH_mono {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : dimH s ≤ dimH t := by
borelize X
exact dimH_le fun d hd => le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top <| top_unique <| hd ▸ measure_mono h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_mono dimH_mono
theorem dimH_subsingleton {s : Set X} (h : s.Subsingleton) : dimH s = 0 := by
borelize X
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
refine dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top ?_
exact ((hausdorffMeasure_le_one_of_subsingleton h le_rfl).trans_lt ENNReal.one_lt_top).ne
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_subsingleton dimH_subsingleton
alias Set.Subsingleton.dimH_zero := dimH_subsingleton
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align set.subsingleton.dimH_zero Set.Subsingleton.dimH_zero
@[simp]
theorem dimH_empty : dimH (∅ : Set X) = 0 :=
subsingleton_empty.dimH_zero
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_empty dimH_empty
@[simp]
theorem dimH_singleton (x : X) : dimH ({x} : Set X) = 0 :=
subsingleton_singleton.dimH_zero
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_singleton dimH_singleton
@[simp]
theorem dimH_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set X) :
dimH (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, dimH (s i) := by
borelize X
refine le_antisymm (dimH_le fun d hd => ?_) (iSup_le fun i => dimH_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
contrapose! hd
have : ∀ i, μH[d] (s i) = 0 := fun i =>
hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt ((le_iSup (fun i => dimH (s i)) i).trans_lt hd)
rw [measure_iUnion_null this]
exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dimH_Union dimH_iUnion
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDimension.lean | 212 | 215 | theorem dimH_bUnion {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Countable) (t : ι → Set X) :
dimH (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, dimH (t i) := by |
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, dimH_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
#align_import data.set.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file defines the product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i` along with the diagonal of a
type.
## Main declarations
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun _ => And.decidable
#align set.decidable_mem_prod Set.decidableMemProd
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
#align set.prod_mono Set.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align set.prod_mono_left Set.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align set.prod_mono_right Set.prod_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
#align set.prod_self_subset_prod_self Set.prod_self_subset_prod_self
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
#align set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self Set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
#align set.prod_subset_iff Set.prod_subset_iff
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
#align set.forall_prod_set Set.forall_prod_set
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
#align set.exists_prod_set Set.exists_prod_set
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact and_false_iff _
#align set.prod_empty Set.prod_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_prod Set.empty_prod
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact true_and_iff _
#align set.univ_prod_univ Set.univ_prod_univ
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.univ_prod Set.univ_prod
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.prod_univ Set.prod_univ
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.singleton_prod Set.singleton_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.prod_singleton Set.prod_singleton
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by simp
#align set.singleton_prod_singleton Set.singleton_prod_singleton
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
#align set.union_prod Set.union_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
#align set.prod_union Set.prod_union
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.inter_prod Set.inter_prod
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.prod_inter Set.prod_inter
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align set.prod_inter_prod Set.prod_inter_prod
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
#align set.disjoint_prod Set.disjoint_prod
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_left Set.Disjoint.set_prod_left
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_right Set.Disjoint.set_prod_right
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp]
#align set.insert_prod Set.insert_prod
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
-- porting note (#10745):
-- was `simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp, Imp.swap]`
simp only [mem_prod, mem_insert_iff, image, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.injEq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hx, rfl|hy⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, hy⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩|⟨hx, hy⟩ := h
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inl rfl⟩
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inr hy⟩
#align set.prod_insert Set.prod_insert
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_eq Set.prod_preimage_eq
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_left Set.prod_preimage_left
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_right Set.prod_preimage_right
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_prod_map_prod Set.preimage_prod_map_prod
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.mk_preimage_prod Set.mk_preimage_prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left Set.mk_preimage_prod_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right Set.mk_preimage_prod_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
#align set.preimage_swap_prod Set.preimage_swap_prod
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
#align set.image_swap_prod Set.image_swap_prod
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
#align set.prod_image_image_eq Set.prod_image_image_eq
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_range_eq Set.prod_range_range_eq
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prod_map {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
#align set.range_prod_map Set.range_prod_map
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_univ_eq Set.prod_range_univ_eq
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_univ_range_eq Set.prod_univ_range_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 303 | 307 | theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by |
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prod_map]
apply range_comp_subset_range
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gaussian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7982767093ae38cba236487f9c9dd9cd99f63c16"
/-!
# Gaussian integral
We prove various versions of the formula for the Gaussian integral:
* `integral_gaussian`: for real `b` we have `∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = √(π / b)`.
* `integral_gaussian_complex`: for complex `b` with `0 < re b` we have
`∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2)`.
* `integral_gaussian_Ioi` and `integral_gaussian_complex_Ioi`: variants for integrals over `Ioi 0`.
* `Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq`: the formula `Γ (1 / 2) = √π`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Real Topology
open Complex hiding exp abs_of_nonneg
theorem exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg {p b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (hp : 1 < p) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
rw [isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
suffices Tendsto (fun x => x * (b * x ^ (p - 1) + -1)) atTop atTop by
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ this
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)) (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [rpow_sub_one hx.ne']
field_simp [hx.ne']
ring
apply Tendsto.atTop_mul_atTop tendsto_id
refine tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop (-1 : ℝ) ?_
exact Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hb (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by linarith))
theorem exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb one_lt_two
#align exp_neg_mul_sq_is_o_exp_neg exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg (s : ℝ) {b p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
apply ((isBigO_refl (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s) atTop).mul_isLittleO
(exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb hp)).trans
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO s
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg s one_lt_two hb
#align rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_is_o_exp_neg rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg
theorem integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p s : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) := by
obtain hp | hp := le_iff_lt_or_eq.mp hp
· have h_exp : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun x => exp (- x)) x := fun x => continuousAt_neg.rexp
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi zero_le_one, integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn ?_ ?_ isCompact_Icc
· refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow' hs
· intro x _
change ContinuousWithinAt ((fun x => exp (- x)) ∘ (fun x => x ^ p)) (Icc 0 1) x
refine ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt (h_exp _) ?_
exact continuousWithinAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inr (le_of_lt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hp)))
· have h_rpow : ∀ (x r : ℝ), x ∈ Ici 1 → ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => x ^ r) (Ici 1) x := by
intro _ _ hx
refine continuousWithinAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inl ?_)
exact ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)
refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(ContinuousOn.mul (fun x hx => h_rpow x s hx) (fun x hx => ?_)) (IsLittleO.isBigO ?_)
· change ContinuousWithinAt ((fun x => exp (- x)) ∘ (fun x => x ^ p)) (Ici 1) x
exact ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt (h_exp _) (h_rpow x p hx)
· convert rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg s hp (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 1) using 3
rw [neg_mul, one_mul]
· simp_rw [← hp, Real.rpow_one]
convert Real.GammaIntegral_convergent (by linarith : 0 < s + 1) using 2
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, mul_comm]
theorem integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p s b : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hb : 0 < b) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- b * x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) := by
have hib : 0 < b ^ (-p⁻¹) := rpow_pos_of_pos hb _
suffices IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ (b ^ (-p⁻¹)) ^ s * (x ^ s * exp (-x ^ p))) (Ioi 0) by
rw [show 0 = b ^ (-p⁻¹) * 0 by rw [mul_zero], ← integrableOn_Ioi_comp_mul_left_iff _ _ hib]
refine this.congr_fun (fun _ hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioi
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_rpow, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul (z := p), neg_mul, neg_mul, inv_mul_cancel,
rpow_neg_one, mul_inv_cancel_left₀]
all_goals linarith [mem_Ioi.mp hx]
refine Integrable.const_mul ?_ _
rw [← IntegrableOn]
exact integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow hs hp
theorem integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) {s : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x ^ 2)) (Ioi 0) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow hs one_le_two hb
#align integrable_on_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq
theorem integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) {s : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x ^ 2) := by
rw [← integrableOn_univ, ← @Iio_union_Ici _ _ (0 : ℝ), integrableOn_union,
integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi]
refine ⟨?_, integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb hs⟩
rw [← (Measure.measurePreserving_neg (volume : Measure ℝ)).integrableOn_comp_preimage
(Homeomorph.neg ℝ).measurableEmbedding]
simp only [Function.comp, neg_sq, neg_preimage, preimage_neg_Iio, neg_neg, neg_zero]
apply Integrable.mono' (integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb hs)
· apply Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable
exact (measurable_id'.neg.pow measurable_const).mul
((measurable_id'.pow measurable_const).const_mul (-b)).exp
· have : MeasurableSet (Ioi (0 : ℝ)) := measurableSet_Ioi
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem this] with x hx
have h'x : 0 ≤ x := le_of_lt hx
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (exp_pos _).le
simpa [abs_of_nonneg h'x] using abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (-x) s
#align integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq
theorem integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2) := by
simpa using integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb (by norm_num : (-1 : ℝ) < 0)
#align integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff {b : ℝ} :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) (Ioi 0) ↔ 0 < b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq h).integrableOn⟩
by_contra! hb
have : ∫⁻ _ : ℝ in Ioi 0, 1 ≤ ∫⁻ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ‖exp (-b * x ^ 2)‖₊ := by
apply lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ _)
simp only [neg_mul, ENNReal.one_le_coe_iff, ← toNNReal_one, toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, coe_nnnorm, one_le_exp_iff, Right.nonneg_neg_iff]
exact fun x ↦ mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hb (sq_nonneg x)
simpa using this.trans_lt h.2
#align integrable_on_Ioi_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff integrableOn_Ioi_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff
theorem integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff {b : ℝ} :
(Integrable fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) ↔ 0 < b :=
⟨fun h => integrableOn_Ioi_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff.mp h.integrableOn, integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq⟩
#align integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff
theorem integrable_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => x * exp (-b * x ^ 2) := by
simpa using integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb (by norm_num : (-1 : ℝ) < 1)
#align integrable_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq integrable_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq (b : ℂ) (x : ℝ) :
‖Complex.exp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)‖ = exp (-b.re * x ^ 2) := by
rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_exp, ← ofReal_pow, mul_comm (-b) _, re_ofReal_mul, neg_re,
mul_comm]
#align norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
refine ⟨(Complex.continuous_exp.comp
(continuous_const.mul (continuous_ofReal.pow 2))).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq]
exact (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq hb).2
#align integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq
theorem integrable_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => ↑x * cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
refine ⟨(continuous_ofReal.mul (Complex.continuous_exp.comp ?_)).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
· exact continuous_const.mul (continuous_ofReal.pow 2)
have := (integrable_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb).hasFiniteIntegral
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff] at this ⊢
convert this
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq b, Complex.norm_eq_abs, abs_ofReal, Real.norm_eq_abs,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le]
#align integrable_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq integrable_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq
theorem integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
∫ r : ℝ in Ioi 0, (r : ℂ) * cexp (-b * (r : ℂ) ^ 2) = (2 * b)⁻¹ := by
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
have A : ∀ x : ℂ, HasDerivAt (fun x => -(2 * b)⁻¹ * cexp (-b * x ^ 2))
(x * cexp (-b * x ^ 2)) x := by
intro x
convert ((hasDerivAt_pow 2 x).const_mul (-b)).cexp.const_mul (-(2 * b)⁻¹) using 1
field_simp [hb']
ring
have B : Tendsto (fun y : ℝ ↦ -(2 * b)⁻¹ * cexp (-b * (y : ℂ) ^ 2))
atTop (𝓝 (-(2 * b)⁻¹ * 0)) := by
refine Tendsto.const_mul _ (tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr ?_)
simp_rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq b]
exact tendsto_exp_atBot.comp
((tendsto_pow_atTop two_ne_zero).const_mul_atTop_of_neg (neg_lt_zero.2 hb))
convert integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ => (A ↑x).comp_ofReal)
(integrable_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb).integrableOn B using 1
simp only [mul_zero, ofReal_zero, zero_pow, Ne, bit0_eq_zero, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add]
#align integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq
/-- The *square* of the Gaussian integral `∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2)` is equal to `π / b`. -/
theorem integral_gaussian_sq_complex {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
(∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) ^ 2 = π / b := by
/- We compute `(∫ exp (-b x^2))^2` as an integral over `ℝ^2`, and then make a polar change
of coordinates. We are left with `∫ r * exp (-b r^2)`, which has been computed in
`integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq` using the fact that this function has an obvious primitive. -/
calc
(∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) ^ 2 =
∫ p : ℝ × ℝ, cexp (-b * (p.1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * cexp (-b * (p.2 : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
rw [pow_two, ← integral_prod_mul]; rfl
_ = ∫ p : ℝ × ℝ, cexp (-b * ((p.1 : ℂ)^ 2 + (p.2 : ℂ) ^ 2)) := by
congr
ext1 p
rw [← Complex.exp_add, mul_add]
_ = ∫ p in polarCoord.target, p.1 •
cexp (-b * ((p.1 * Complex.cos p.2) ^ 2 + (p.1 * Complex.sin p.2) ^ 2)) := by
rw [← integral_comp_polarCoord_symm]
simp only [polarCoord_symm_apply, ofReal_mul, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin]
_ = (∫ r in Ioi (0 : ℝ), r * cexp (-b * (r : ℂ) ^ 2)) * ∫ θ in Ioo (-π) π, 1 := by
rw [← setIntegral_prod_mul]
congr with p : 1
rw [mul_one]
congr
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul ((p.1 : ℂ) ^ 2), ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq (p.2 : ℂ)]
ring
_ = ↑π / b := by
have : 0 ≤ π + π := by linarith [Real.pi_pos]
simp only [integral_const, Measure.restrict_apply', measurableSet_Ioo, univ_inter, volume_Ioo,
sub_neg_eq_add, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal, this]
rw [← two_mul, real_smul, mul_one, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb]
field_simp [(by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re] : b ≠ 0)]
ring
#align integral_gaussian_sq_complex integral_gaussian_sq_complex
theorem integral_gaussian (b : ℝ) : ∫ x : ℝ, exp (-b * x ^ 2) = √(π / b) := by
-- First we deal with the crazy case where `b ≤ 0`: then both sides vanish.
rcases le_or_lt b 0 with (hb | hb)
· rw [integral_undef, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
· exact div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos pi_pos.le hb
· simpa only [not_lt, integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff] using hb
-- Assume now `b > 0`. Then both sides are non-negative and their squares agree.
refine (sq_eq_sq (by positivity) (by positivity)).1 ?_
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_pow, ← coe_algebraMap, RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, ← integral_ofReal,
sq_sqrt (div_pos pi_pos hb).le, ← RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, coe_algebraMap, ofReal_div]
convert integral_gaussian_sq_complex (by rwa [ofReal_re] : 0 < (b : ℂ).re) with _ x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_neg]
#align integral_gaussian integral_gaussian
theorem continuousAt_gaussian_integral (b : ℂ) (hb : 0 < re b) :
ContinuousAt (fun c : ℂ => ∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-c * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) b := by
let f : ℂ → ℝ → ℂ := fun (c : ℂ) (x : ℝ) => cexp (-c * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)
obtain ⟨d, hd, hd'⟩ := exists_between hb
have f_meas : ∀ c : ℂ, AEStronglyMeasurable (f c) volume := fun c => by
apply Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable
exact Complex.continuous_exp.comp (continuous_const.mul (continuous_ofReal.pow 2))
have f_cts : ∀ x : ℝ, ContinuousAt (fun c => f c x) b := fun x =>
(Complex.continuous_exp.comp (continuous_id'.neg.mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
have f_le_bd : ∀ᶠ c : ℂ in 𝓝 b, ∀ᵐ x : ℝ, ‖f c x‖ ≤ exp (-d * x ^ 2) := by
refine eventually_of_mem ((continuous_re.isOpen_preimage _ isOpen_Ioi).mem_nhds hd') ?_
intro c hc; filter_upwards with x
rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq]
gcongr
exact le_of_lt hc
exact
continuousAt_of_dominated (eventually_of_forall f_meas) f_le_bd (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq hd)
(ae_of_all _ f_cts)
#align continuous_at_gaussian_integral continuousAt_gaussian_integral
theorem integral_gaussian_complex {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < re b) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) := by
have nv : ∀ {b : ℂ}, 0 < re b → b ≠ 0 := by intro b hb; contrapose! hb; rw [hb]; simp
apply
(convex_halfspace_re_gt 0).isPreconnected.eq_of_sq_eq ?_ ?_ (fun c hc => ?_) (fun {c} hc => ?_)
(by simp : 0 < re (1 : ℂ)) ?_ hb
· -- integral is continuous
exact ContinuousAt.continuousOn continuousAt_gaussian_integral
· -- `(π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ)` is continuous
refine
ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun b hb =>
(continuousAt_cpow_const (Or.inl ?_)).comp (continuousAt_const.div continuousAt_id (nv hb))
rw [div_re, ofReal_im, ofReal_re, zero_mul, zero_div, add_zero]
exact div_pos (mul_pos pi_pos hb) (normSq_pos.mpr (nv hb))
· -- equality at 1
have : ∀ x : ℝ, cexp (-(1 : ℂ) * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = exp (-(1 : ℝ) * x ^ 2) := by
intro x
simp only [ofReal_exp, neg_mul, one_mul, ofReal_neg, ofReal_pow]
simp_rw [this, ← coe_algebraMap, RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, integral_ofReal,
← RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, coe_algebraMap]
conv_rhs =>
congr
· rw [← ofReal_one, ← ofReal_div]
· rw [← ofReal_one, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_div]
rw [← ofReal_cpow, ofReal_inj]
· convert integral_gaussian (1 : ℝ) using 1
rw [sqrt_eq_rpow]
· rw [div_one]; exact pi_pos.le
· -- squares of both sides agree
dsimp only [Pi.pow_apply]
rw [integral_gaussian_sq_complex hc, sq]
conv_lhs => rw [← cpow_one (↑π / c)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (div_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero) (nv hc))]
norm_num
· -- RHS doesn't vanish
rw [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl (div_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero) (nv hc))
#align integral_gaussian_complex integral_gaussian_complex
-- The Gaussian integral on the half-line, `∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-b * x^2)`, for complex `b`.
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/GaussianIntegral.lean | 312 | 334 | theorem integral_gaussian_complex_Ioi {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < re b) :
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) / 2 := by |
have full_integral := integral_gaussian_complex hb
have : MeasurableSet (Ioi (0 : ℝ)) := measurableSet_Ioi
rw [← integral_add_compl this (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb), compl_Ioi] at full_integral
suffices ∫ x : ℝ in Iic 0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = ∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) by
rw [this, ← mul_two] at full_integral
rwa [eq_div_iff]; exact two_ne_zero
have : ∀ c : ℝ, ∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..c, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) =
∫ x in -c..0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
intro c
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_sub_left (a := 0) (b := c)
(fun x => cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) 0
simpa [zero_sub, neg_sq, neg_zero] using this
have t1 :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb).integrableOn tendsto_id
have t2 :
Tendsto (fun c : ℝ => ∫ x : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) atTop
(𝓝 (∫ x : ℝ in Iic 0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2))) := by
simp_rw [this]
refine intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic _ ?_ tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot
apply (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb).integrableOn
exact tendsto_nhds_unique t2 t1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule
#align_import representation_theory.maschke from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Maschke's theorem
We prove **Maschke's theorem** for finite groups,
in the formulation that every submodule of a `k[G]` module has a complement,
when `k` is a field with `Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)`.
We do the core computation in greater generality.
For any `[CommRing k]` in which `[Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]`,
and a `k[G]`-linear map `i : V → W` which admits a `k`-linear retraction `π`,
we produce a `k[G]`-linear retraction by
taking the average over `G` of the conjugates of `π`.
## Implementation Notes
* These results assume `Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)` which is equivalent to the more
familiar `¬(ringChar k ∣ Fintype.card G)`. It is possible to convert between them using
`invertibleOfRingCharNotDvd` and `not_ringChar_dvd_of_invertible`.
## Future work
It's not so far to give the usual statement, that every finite dimensional representation
of a finite group is semisimple (i.e. a direct sum of irreducibles).
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Module MonoidAlgebra
/-!
We now do the key calculation in Maschke's theorem.
Given `V → W`, an inclusion of `k[G]` modules,
assume we have some retraction `π` (i.e. `∀ v, π (i v) = v`),
just as a `k`-linear map.
(When `k` is a field, this will be available cheaply, by choosing a basis.)
We now construct a retraction of the inclusion as a `k[G]`-linear map,
by the formula
$$ \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} g⁻¹ • π(g • -). $$
-/
namespace LinearMap
-- At first we work with any `[CommRing k]`, and add the assumption that
-- `[Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]` when it is required.
variable {k : Type u} [CommRing k] {G : Type u} [Group G]
variable {V : Type v} [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
variable [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
variable {W : Type w} [AddCommGroup W] [Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
variable [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
variable (π : W →ₗ[k] V)
/-- We define the conjugate of `π` by `g`, as a `k`-linear map. -/
def conjugate (g : G) : W →ₗ[k] V :=
.comp (.comp (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g⁻¹) π) (GroupSMul.linearMap k W g)
#align linear_map.conjugate LinearMap.conjugate
theorem conjugate_apply (g : G) (v : W) :
π.conjugate g v = MonoidAlgebra.single g⁻¹ (1 : k) • π (MonoidAlgebra.single g (1 : k) • v) :=
rfl
variable (i : V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W) (h : ∀ v : V, (π : W → V) (i v) = v)
section
theorem conjugate_i (g : G) (v : V) : (conjugate π g : W → V) (i v) = v := by
rw [conjugate_apply, ← i.map_smul, h, ← mul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_one, mul_left_inv,
← one_def, one_smul]
#align linear_map.conjugate_i LinearMap.conjugate_i
end
variable (G) [Fintype G]
/-- The sum of the conjugates of `π` by each element `g : G`, as a `k`-linear map.
(We postpone dividing by the size of the group as long as possible.)
-/
def sumOfConjugates : W →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ g : G, π.conjugate g
#align linear_map.sum_of_conjugates LinearMap.sumOfConjugates
lemma sumOfConjugates_apply (v : W) : π.sumOfConjugates G v = ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v :=
LinearMap.sum_apply _ _ _
/-- In fact, the sum over `g : G` of the conjugate of `π` by `g` is a `k[G]`-linear map.
-/
def sumOfConjugatesEquivariant : W →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] V :=
MonoidAlgebra.equivariantOfLinearOfComm (π.sumOfConjugates G) fun g v => by
simp only [sumOfConjugates_apply, Finset.smul_sum, conjugate_apply]
refine Fintype.sum_bijective (· * g) (Group.mulRight_bijective g) _ _ fun i ↦ ?_
simp only [smul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left, one_mul]
#align linear_map.sum_of_conjugates_equivariant LinearMap.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant
theorem sumOfConjugatesEquivariant_apply (v : W) :
π.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant G v = ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v :=
π.sumOfConjugates_apply G v
section
variable [Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]
/-- We construct our `k[G]`-linear retraction of `i` as
$$ \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} g⁻¹ • π(g • -). $$
-/
def equivariantProjection : W →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] V :=
⅟(Fintype.card G : k) • π.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant G
#align linear_map.equivariant_projection LinearMap.equivariantProjection
theorem equivariantProjection_apply (v : W) :
π.equivariantProjection G v = ⅟(Fintype.card G : k) • ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v := by
simp only [equivariantProjection, smul_apply, sumOfConjugatesEquivariant_apply]
theorem equivariantProjection_condition (v : V) : (π.equivariantProjection G) (i v) = v := by
rw [equivariantProjection_apply]
simp only [conjugate_i π i h]
rw [Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_univ, nsmul_eq_smul_cast k, smul_smul,
Invertible.invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
#align linear_map.equivariant_projection_condition LinearMap.equivariantProjection_condition
end
end LinearMap
end
namespace MonoidAlgebra
-- Now we work over a `[Field k]`.
variable {k : Type u} [Field k] {G : Type u} [Fintype G] [Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]
variable [Group G]
variable {V : Type u} [AddCommGroup V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
variable {W : Type u} [AddCommGroup W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
theorem exists_leftInverse_of_injective (f : V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W)
(hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) :
∃ g : W →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] V, g.comp f = LinearMap.id := by
let A := MonoidAlgebra k G
letI : Module k W := .compHom W (algebraMap k A)
letI : Module k V := .compHom V (algebraMap k A)
have := IsScalarTower.of_compHom k A W
have := IsScalarTower.of_compHom k A V
obtain ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := (f.restrictScalars k).exists_leftInverse_of_injective <| by
simp only [hf, Submodule.restrictScalars_bot, LinearMap.ker_restrictScalars]
refine ⟨φ.equivariantProjection G, DFunLike.ext _ _ ?_⟩
exact φ.equivariantProjection_condition G _ <| DFunLike.congr_fun hφ
#align monoid_algebra.exists_left_inverse_of_injective MonoidAlgebra.exists_leftInverse_of_injective
namespace Submodule
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Maschke.lean | 166 | 169 | theorem exists_isCompl (p : Submodule (MonoidAlgebra k G) V) :
∃ q : Submodule (MonoidAlgebra k G) V, IsCompl p q := by |
rcases MonoidAlgebra.exists_leftInverse_of_injective p.subtype p.ker_subtype with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨LinearMap.ker f, LinearMap.isCompl_of_proj <| DFunLike.congr_fun hf⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import analysis.convex.between from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"571e13cacbed7bf042fd3058ce27157101433842"
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
#align affine_segment affineSegment
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
#align affine_segment_eq_segment affineSegment_eq_segment
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
#align affine_segment_comm affineSegment_comm
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
#align left_mem_affine_segment left_mem_affineSegment
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
#align right_mem_affine_segment right_mem_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
-- Porting note: added as this doesn't do anything in `simp_rw` any more
rw [affineSegment]
-- Note: when adding "simp made no progress" in lean4#2336,
-- had to change `lineMap_same` to `lineMap_same _`. Not sure why?
-- Porting note: added `_ _` and `Function.const`
simp_rw [lineMap_same _, AffineMap.coe_const _ _, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
#align affine_segment_same affineSegment_same
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
#align affine_segment_image affineSegment_image
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vadd_image affineSegment_const_vadd_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_vadd_const_image affineSegment_vadd_const_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vsub_image affineSegment_const_vsub_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_vsub_const_image affineSegment_vsub_const_image
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vadd_affine_segment mem_const_vadd_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vadd_const_affine_segment mem_vadd_const_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vsub_affine_segment mem_const_vsub_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vsub_const_affine_segment mem_vsub_const_affineSegment
variable (R)
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
#align wbtw Wbtw
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
#align sbtw Sbtw
variable {R}
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align wbtw.map Wbtw.map
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
#align function.injective.wbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
#align function.injective.sbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.wbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.sbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vadd_iff wbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vadd_const_iff wbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vsub_iff wbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vsub_const_iff wbtw_vsub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vadd_iff sbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vadd_const_iff sbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vsub_iff sbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vsub_const_iff sbtw_vsub_const_iff
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
#align sbtw.wbtw Sbtw.wbtw
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
#align sbtw.ne_left Sbtw.ne_left
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
#align sbtw.left_ne Sbtw.left_ne
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
#align sbtw.ne_right Sbtw.ne_right
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
#align sbtw.right_ne Sbtw.right_ne
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
#align sbtw.mem_image_Ioo Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align wbtw.mem_affine_span Wbtw.mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
#align wbtw_comm wbtw_comm
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
#align wbtw.symm Wbtw.symm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
#align sbtw_comm sbtw_comm
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
#align sbtw.symm Sbtw.symm
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_left wbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_right wbtw_self_right
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: Originally `simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h`
have ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := h
rw [h₂.symm, lineMap_same_apply]
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
#align wbtw_self_iff wbtw_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_left not_sbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_right not_sbtw_self_right
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
#align sbtw.left_ne_right Sbtw.left_ne_right
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
#align sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self not_sbtw_self
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
#align wbtw_swap_left_iff wbtw_swap_left_iff
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
#align wbtw_swap_right_iff wbtw_swap_right_iff
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
#align wbtw_rotate_iff wbtw_rotate_iff
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.swap_left_iff Wbtw.swap_left_iff
theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.swap_right_iff Wbtw.swap_right_iff
theorem Wbtw.rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_rotate_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.rotate_iff Wbtw.rotate_iff
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R y x z := fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.swap_left_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_swap_left Sbtw.not_swap_left
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R x z y := fun hs => h.ne_right (h.wbtw.swap_right_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_swap_right Sbtw.not_swap_right
theorem Sbtw.not_rotate [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : ¬Wbtw R z x y :=
fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.rotate_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_rotate Sbtw.not_rotate
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Wbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, lineMap_same_apply]
simp
rw [or_iff_right hxy, Wbtw, affineSegment, (lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
#align wbtw_line_map_iff wbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Sbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne, and_comm, and_congr_right]
intro hxy
rw [(lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
#align sbtw_line_map_iff sbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Wbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
wbtw_lineMap_iff
#align wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Sbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 :=
sbtw_lineMap_iff
#align sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment, Set.mem_image]
simp_rw [lineMap_apply_ring]
simp
#align wbtw_zero_one_iff wbtw_zero_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_zero_one_iff]
#align wbtw_one_zero_iff wbtw_one_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Sbtw, wbtw_zero_one_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Ioo]
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1.1.lt_of_ne (Ne.symm h.2.1), h.1.2.lt_of_ne h.2.2⟩, fun h =>
⟨⟨h.1.le, h.2.le⟩, h.1.ne', h.2.ne⟩⟩
#align sbtw_zero_one_iff sbtw_zero_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_zero_one_iff]
#align sbtw_one_zero_iff sbtw_one_zero_iff
theorem Wbtw.trans_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : Wbtw R w x z := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨t₂ * t₁, ⟨mul_nonneg ht₂.1 ht₁.1, mul_le_one ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, lineMap_vsub_left, smul_smul]
#align wbtw.trans_left Wbtw.trans_left
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 474 | 476 | theorem Wbtw.trans_right {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z) (h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R w y z := by |
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_left h₂
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Monad.Basic
import Mathlib.Control.Monad.Writer
import Mathlib.Init.Control.Lawful
#align_import control.monad.cont from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6814c584384ddf2825ff038e868451a7c956f31"
/-!
# Continuation Monad
Monad encapsulating continuation passing programming style, similar to
Haskell's `Cont`, `ContT` and `MonadCont`:
<http://hackage.haskell.org/package/mtl-2.2.2/docs/Control-Monad-Cont.html>
-/
universe u v w u₀ u₁ v₀ v₁
structure MonadCont.Label (α : Type w) (m : Type u → Type v) (β : Type u) where
apply : α → m β
#align monad_cont.label MonadCont.Label
def MonadCont.goto {α β} {m : Type u → Type v} (f : MonadCont.Label α m β) (x : α) :=
f.apply x
#align monad_cont.goto MonadCont.goto
class MonadCont (m : Type u → Type v) where
callCC : ∀ {α β}, (MonadCont.Label α m β → m α) → m α
#align monad_cont MonadCont
open MonadCont
class LawfulMonadCont (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m] [MonadCont m]
extends LawfulMonad m : Prop where
callCC_bind_right {α ω γ} (cmd : m α) (next : Label ω m γ → α → m ω) :
(callCC fun f => cmd >>= next f) = cmd >>= fun x => callCC fun f => next f x
callCC_bind_left {α} (β) (x : α) (dead : Label α m β → β → m α) :
(callCC fun f : Label α m β => goto f x >>= dead f) = pure x
callCC_dummy {α β} (dummy : m α) : (callCC fun _ : Label α m β => dummy) = dummy
#align is_lawful_monad_cont LawfulMonadCont
export LawfulMonadCont (callCC_bind_right callCC_bind_left callCC_dummy)
def ContT (r : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) (α : Type w) :=
(α → m r) → m r
#align cont_t ContT
abbrev Cont (r : Type u) (α : Type w) :=
ContT r id α
#align cont Cont
namespace ContT
export MonadCont (Label goto)
variable {r : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} {α β γ ω : Type w}
def run : ContT r m α → (α → m r) → m r :=
id
#align cont_t.run ContT.run
def map (f : m r → m r) (x : ContT r m α) : ContT r m α :=
f ∘ x
#align cont_t.map ContT.map
theorem run_contT_map_contT (f : m r → m r) (x : ContT r m α) : run (map f x) = f ∘ run x :=
rfl
#align cont_t.run_cont_t_map_cont_t ContT.run_contT_map_contT
def withContT (f : (β → m r) → α → m r) (x : ContT r m α) : ContT r m β := fun g => x <| f g
#align cont_t.with_cont_t ContT.withContT
theorem run_withContT (f : (β → m r) → α → m r) (x : ContT r m α) :
run (withContT f x) = run x ∘ f :=
rfl
#align cont_t.run_with_cont_t ContT.run_withContT
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {x y : ContT r m α} (h : ∀ f, x.run f = y.run f) : x = y := by
unfold ContT; ext; apply h
#align cont_t.ext ContT.ext
instance : Monad (ContT r m) where
pure x f := f x
bind x f g := x fun i => f i g
instance : LawfulMonad (ContT r m) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := by intros; rfl)
(pure_bind := by intros; ext; rfl)
(bind_assoc := by intros; ext; rfl)
def monadLift [Monad m] {α} : m α → ContT r m α := fun x f => x >>= f
#align cont_t.monad_lift ContT.monadLift
instance [Monad m] : MonadLift m (ContT r m) where
monadLift := ContT.monadLift
theorem monadLift_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {α β} (x : m α) (f : α → m β) :
(monadLift (x >>= f) : ContT r m β) = monadLift x >>= monadLift ∘ f := by
ext
simp only [monadLift, MonadLift.monadLift, (· ∘ ·), (· >>= ·), bind_assoc, id, run,
ContT.monadLift]
#align cont_t.monad_lift_bind ContT.monadLift_bind
instance : MonadCont (ContT r m) where
callCC f g := f ⟨fun x _ => g x⟩ g
instance : LawfulMonadCont (ContT r m) where
callCC_bind_right := by intros; ext; rfl
callCC_bind_left := by intros; ext; rfl
callCC_dummy := by intros; ext; rfl
instance (ε) [MonadExcept ε m] : MonadExcept ε (ContT r m) where
throw e _ := throw e
tryCatch act h f := tryCatch (act f) fun e => h e f
end ContT
variable {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m]
def ExceptT.mkLabel {α β ε} : Label (Except.{u, u} ε α) m β → Label α (ExceptT ε m) β
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun a => monadLift <| f (Except.ok a)⟩
#align except_t.mk_label ExceptTₓ.mkLabel
theorem ExceptT.goto_mkLabel {α β ε : Type _} (x : Label (Except.{u, u} ε α) m β) (i : α) :
goto (ExceptT.mkLabel x) i = ExceptT.mk (Except.ok <$> goto x (Except.ok i)) := by
cases x; rfl
#align except_t.goto_mk_label ExceptTₓ.goto_mkLabel
nonrec def ExceptT.callCC {ε} [MonadCont m] {α β : Type _}
(f : Label α (ExceptT ε m) β → ExceptT ε m α) : ExceptT ε m α :=
ExceptT.mk (callCC fun x : Label _ m β => ExceptT.run <| f (ExceptT.mkLabel x))
#align except_t.call_cc ExceptTₓ.callCC
instance {ε} [MonadCont m] : MonadCont (ExceptT ε m) where
callCC := ExceptT.callCC
instance {ε} [MonadCont m] [LawfulMonadCont m] : LawfulMonadCont (ExceptT ε m) where
callCC_bind_right := by
intros; simp only [callCC, ExceptT.callCC, ExceptT.run_bind, callCC_bind_right]; ext
dsimp
congr with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [ExceptT.bindCont, @callCC_dummy m _]
callCC_bind_left := by
intros
simp only [callCC, ExceptT.callCC, ExceptT.goto_mkLabel, map_eq_bind_pure_comp, Function.comp,
ExceptT.run_bind, ExceptT.run_mk, bind_assoc, pure_bind, @callCC_bind_left m _]
ext; rfl
callCC_dummy := by intros; simp only [callCC, ExceptT.callCC, @callCC_dummy m _]; ext; rfl
def OptionT.mkLabel {α β} : Label (Option.{u} α) m β → Label α (OptionT m) β
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun a => monadLift <| f (some a)⟩
#align option_t.mk_label OptionTₓ.mkLabel
theorem OptionT.goto_mkLabel {α β : Type _} (x : Label (Option.{u} α) m β) (i : α) :
goto (OptionT.mkLabel x) i = OptionT.mk (goto x (some i) >>= fun a => pure (some a)) :=
rfl
#align option_t.goto_mk_label OptionTₓ.goto_mkLabel
nonrec def OptionT.callCC [MonadCont m] {α β : Type _} (f : Label α (OptionT m) β → OptionT m α) :
OptionT m α :=
OptionT.mk (callCC fun x : Label _ m β => OptionT.run <| f (OptionT.mkLabel x) : m (Option α))
#align option_t.call_cc OptionTₓ.callCC
instance [MonadCont m] : MonadCont (OptionT m) where
callCC := OptionT.callCC
instance [MonadCont m] [LawfulMonadCont m] : LawfulMonadCont (OptionT m) where
callCC_bind_right := by
intros; simp only [callCC, OptionT.callCC, OptionT.run_bind, callCC_bind_right]; ext
dsimp
congr with ⟨⟩ <;> simp [@callCC_dummy m _]
callCC_bind_left := by
intros;
simp only [callCC, OptionT.callCC, OptionT.goto_mkLabel, OptionT.run_bind, OptionT.run_mk,
bind_assoc, pure_bind, @callCC_bind_left m _]
ext; rfl
callCC_dummy := by intros; simp only [callCC, OptionT.callCC, @callCC_dummy m _]; ext; rfl
/- Porting note: In Lean 3, `One ω` is required for `MonadLift (WriterT ω m)`. In Lean 4,
`EmptyCollection ω` or `Monoid ω` is required. So we give definitions for the both
instances. -/
def WriterT.mkLabel {α β ω} [EmptyCollection ω] : Label (α × ω) m β → Label α (WriterT ω m) β
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun a => monadLift <| f (a, ∅)⟩
def WriterT.mkLabel' {α β ω} [Monoid ω] : Label (α × ω) m β → Label α (WriterT ω m) β
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun a => monadLift <| f (a, 1)⟩
#align writer_t.mk_label WriterTₓ.mkLabel'
| Mathlib/Control/Monad/Cont.lean | 193 | 194 | theorem WriterT.goto_mkLabel {α β ω : Type _} [EmptyCollection ω] (x : Label (α × ω) m β) (i : α) :
goto (WriterT.mkLabel x) i = monadLift (goto x (i, ∅)) := by | cases x; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import data.part from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"80c43012d26f63026d362c3aba28f3c3bafb07e6"
/-!
# Partial values of a type
This file defines `Part α`, the partial values of a type.
`o : Part α` carries a proposition `o.Dom`, its domain, along with a function `get : o.Dom → α`, its
value. The rule is then that every partial value has a value but, to access it, you need to provide
a proof of the domain.
`Part α` behaves the same as `Option α` except that `o : Option α` is decidably `none` or `some a`
for some `a : α`, while the domain of `o : Part α` doesn't have to be decidable. That means you can
translate back and forth between a partial value with a decidable domain and an option, and
`Option α` and `Part α` are classically equivalent. In general, `Part α` is bigger than `Option α`.
In current mathlib, `Part ℕ`, aka `PartENat`, is used to move decidability of the order to
decidability of `PartENat.find` (which is the smallest natural satisfying a predicate, or `∞` if
there's none).
## Main declarations
`Option`-like declarations:
* `Part.none`: The partial value whose domain is `False`.
* `Part.some a`: The partial value whose domain is `True` and whose value is `a`.
* `Part.ofOption`: Converts an `Option α` to a `Part α` by sending `none` to `none` and `some a` to
`some a`.
* `Part.toOption`: Converts a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an `Option α`.
* `Part.equivOption`: Classical equivalence between `Part α` and `Option α`.
Monadic structure:
* `Part.bind`: `o.bind f` has value `(f (o.get _)).get _` (`f o` morally) and is defined when `o`
and `f (o.get _)` are defined.
* `Part.map`: Maps the value and keeps the same domain.
Other:
* `Part.restrict`: `Part.restrict p o` replaces the domain of `o : Part α` by `p : Prop` so long as
`p → o.Dom`.
* `Part.assert`: `assert p f` appends `p` to the domains of the values of a partial function.
* `Part.unwrap`: Gets the value of a partial value regardless of its domain. Unsound.
## Notation
For `a : α`, `o : Part α`, `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a`. Formally, it means
`o.Dom` and `o.get _ = a`.
-/
open Function
/-- `Part α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `Option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
/-- The domain of a partial value -/
Dom : Prop
/-- Extract a value from a partial value given a proof of `Dom` -/
get : Dom → α
#align part Part
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
#align part.to_option Part.toOption
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_some Part.toOption_isSome
@[simp] lemma toOption_isNone (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isNone ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_none Part.toOption_isNone
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
#align part.ext' Part.ext'
/-- `Part` eta expansion -/
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align part.eta Part.eta
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def Mem (a : α) (o : Part α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
#align part.mem Part.Mem
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
#align part.mem_eq Part.mem_eq
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
#align part.dom_iff_mem Part.dom_iff_mem
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.get_mem Part.get_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.mem_mk_iff Part.mem_mk_iff
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
#align part.ext Part.ext
/-- The `none` value in `Part` has a `False` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
#align part.none Part.none
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
#align part.not_mem_none Part.not_mem_none
/-- The `some a` value in `Part` has a `True` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
#align part.some Part.some
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
#align part.some_dom Part.some_dom
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
#align part.mem_unique Part.mem_unique
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
#align part.mem.left_unique Part.Mem.left_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
#align part.get_eq_of_mem Part.get_eq_of_mem
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
#align part.subsingleton Part.subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
#align part.get_some Part.get_some
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_some Part.mem_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
#align part.mem_some_iff Part.mem_some_iff
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align part.eq_some_iff Part.eq_some_iff
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff Part.eq_none_iff
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff' Part.eq_none_iff'
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
#align part.not_none_dom Part.not_none_dom
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
#align part.some_ne_none Part.some_ne_none
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
#align part.none_ne_some Part.none_ne_some
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
#align part.ne_none_iff Part.ne_none_iff
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
#align part.eq_none_or_eq_some Part.eq_none_or_eq_some
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
#align part.some_injective Part.some_injective
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
#align part.some_inj Part.some_inj
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
#align part.some_get Part.some_get
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_eq_some Part.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
#align part.get_eq_get_of_eq Part.get_eq_get_of_eq
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_mem Part.get_eq_iff_mem
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
#align part.eq_get_iff_mem Part.eq_get_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
#align part.none_to_option Part.none_toOption
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
#align part.some_to_option Part.some_toOption
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
#align part.none_decidable Part.noneDecidable
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
#align part.some_decidable Part.someDecidable
/-- Retrieves the value of `a : Part α` if it exists, and return the provided default value
otherwise. -/
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
#align part.get_or_else Part.getOrElse
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.get_or_else_of_dom Part.getOrElse_of_dom
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
#align part.get_or_else_of_not_dom Part.getOrElse_of_not_dom
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
#align part.get_or_else_none Part.getOrElse_none
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
#align part.get_or_else_some Part.getOrElse_some
-- Porting note: removed `simp`
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
#align part.mem_to_option Part.mem_toOption
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem, like `mem_toOption` but with LHS in `simp` normal form
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.dom.to_option Part.Dom.toOption
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
#align part.to_option_eq_none_iff Part.toOption_eq_none_iff
/- Porting TODO: Removed `simp`. Maybe add `@[simp]` later if `@[simp]` is taken off definition of
`Option.elim` -/
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
#align part.elim_to_option Part.elim_toOption
/-- Converts an `Option α` into a `Part α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
#align part.of_option Part.ofOption
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
#align part.mem_of_option Part.mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
#align part.of_option_dom Part.ofOption_dom
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
#align part.of_option_eq_get Part.ofOption_eq_get
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
#align part.mem_coe Part.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
#align part.coe_none Part.coe_none
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.coe_some Part.coe_some
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
#align part.induction_on Part.induction_on
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
#align part.of_option_decidable Part.ofOptionDecidable
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
#align part.to_of_option Part.to_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
#align part.of_to_option Part.of_toOption
/-- `Part α` is (classically) equivalent to `Option α`. -/
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
#align part.equiv_option Part.equivOption
/-- We give `Part α` the order where everything is greater than `none`. -/
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl x y := id
le_trans x y z f g i := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm x y f g := Part.ext fun z => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
#align part.le_total_of_le_of_le Part.le_total_of_le_of_le
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
#align part.assert Part.assert
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
#align part.bind Part.bind
/-- The map operation for `Part` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
#align part.map Part.map
#align part.map_dom Part.map_Dom
#align part.map_get Part.map_get
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_map Part.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
#align part.mem_map_iff Part.mem_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.map_none Part.map_none
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
#align part.map_some Part.map_some
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_assert Part.mem_assert
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
#align part.mem_assert_iff Part.mem_assert_iff
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· aesop
#align part.assert_pos Part.assert_pos
theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
#align part.assert_neg Part.assert_neg
theorem mem_bind {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩, ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_bind Part.mem_bind
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind_iff {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} {b} : b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
#align part.mem_bind_iff Part.mem_bind_iff
protected theorem Dom.bind {o : Part α} (h : o.Dom) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f (o.get h) := by
ext b
simp only [Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, fun hb => ⟨o.get h, Part.get_mem _, hb⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
rwa [Part.get_eq_of_mem ha]
#align part.dom.bind Part.Dom.bind
theorem Dom.of_bind {f : α → Part β} {a : Part α} (h : (a.bind f).Dom) : a.Dom :=
h.1
#align part.dom.of_bind Part.Dom.of_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_none (f : α → Part β) : none.bind f = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.bind_none Part.bind_none
@[simp]
theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → Part β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
ext <| by simp
#align part.bind_some Part.bind_some
theorem bind_of_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ o) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f a := by
rw [eq_some_iff.2 h, bind_some]
#align part.bind_of_mem Part.bind_of_mem
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : Part α) : x.bind (some ∘ f) = map f x :=
ext <| by simp [eq_comm]
#align part.bind_some_eq_map Part.bind_some_eq_map
theorem bind_toOption (f : α → Part β) (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] [∀ a, Decidable (f a).Dom]
[Decidable (o.bind f).Dom] :
(o.bind f).toOption = o.toOption.elim Option.none fun a => (f a).toOption := by
by_cases h : o.Dom
· simp_rw [h.toOption, h.bind]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
exact Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 fun ho => h ho.of_bind
#align part.bind_to_option Part.bind_toOption
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) (k : β → Part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind fun x => (g x).bind k :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_bind_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
#align part.bind_assoc Part.bind_assoc
@[simp]
theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → Part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind fun y => g (f y) := by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
#align part.bind_map Part.bind_map
@[simp]
theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → Part β) (x : Part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind fun y => map g (f y) := by
rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
#align part.map_bind Part.map_bind
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o := by
erw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_map, bind_some_eq_map]
#align part.map_map Part.map_map
instance : Monad Part where
pure := @some
map := @map
bind := @Part.bind
instance : LawfulMonad
Part where
bind_pure_comp := @bind_some_eq_map
id_map f := by cases f; rfl
pure_bind := @bind_some
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc
map_const := by simp [Functor.mapConst, Functor.map]
--Porting TODO : In Lean3 these were automatic by a tactic
seqLeft_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqLeft.seqLeft, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
seqRight_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqRight.seqRight, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
pure_seq x y := ext'
(by simp [Seq.seq, Part.bind, assert, (· <$> ·), pure])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
bind_map x y := ext'
(by simp [(· >>= ·), Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, get, (· <$> ·)] )
(fun _ _ => rfl)
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ x : α, f x = x) (o) : map f o = o := by
rw [show f = id from funext H]; exact id_map o
#align part.map_id' Part.map_id'
@[simp]
theorem bind_some_right (x : Part α) : x.bind some = x := by
erw [bind_some_eq_map]; simp [map_id']
#align part.bind_some_right Part.bind_some_right
@[simp]
theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a :=
rfl
#align part.pure_eq_some Part.pure_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : (return a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.ret_eq_some Part.ret_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : f <$> o = map f o :=
rfl
#align part.map_eq_map Part.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : f >>= g = f.bind g :=
rfl
#align part.bind_eq_bind Part.bind_eq_bind
theorem bind_le {α} (x : Part α) (f : α → Part β) (y : Part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· intro a h' b
have h := h b
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp] at h
apply h _ h'
· intro b h'
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨a, h₀, h₁⟩
apply h _ h₀ _ h₁
#align part.bind_le Part.bind_le
-- Porting note: No MonadFail in Lean4 yet
-- instance : MonadFail Part :=
-- { Part.monad with fail := fun _ _ => none }
/-- `restrict p o h` replaces the domain of `o` with `p`, and is well defined when
`p` implies `o` is defined. -/
def restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (H : p → o.Dom) : Part α :=
⟨p, fun h => o.get (H h)⟩
#align part.restrict Part.restrict
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (h : p → o.Dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o := by
dsimp [restrict, mem_eq]; constructor
· rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
rintro ⟨h₀, _, h₂⟩; exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
#align part.mem_restrict Part.mem_restrict
/-- `unwrap o` gets the value at `o`, ignoring the condition. This function is unsound. -/
unsafe def unwrap (o : Part α) : α :=
o.get lcProof
#align part.unwrap Part.unwrap
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ h : p, (f h).Dom → (assert p f).Dom :=
Exists.intro
#align part.assert_defined Part.assert_defined
theorem bind_defined {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} :
∀ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom → (f.bind g).Dom :=
assert_defined
#align part.bind_defined Part.bind_defined
@[simp]
theorem bind_dom {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : (f.bind g).Dom ↔ ∃ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.bind_dom Part.bind_dom
section Instances
/-!
We define several instances for constants and operations on `Part α` inherited from `α`.
This section could be moved to a separate file to avoid the import of `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs`.
-/
@[to_additive]
instance [One α] : One (Part α) where one := pure 1
@[to_additive]
instance [Mul α] : Mul (Part α) where mul a b := (· * ·) <$> a <*> b
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] : Inv (Part α) where inv := map Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
instance [Div α] : Div (Part α) where div a b := (· / ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Mod α] : Mod (Part α) where mod a b := (· % ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Append α] : Append (Part α) where append a b := (· ++ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Inter α] : Inter (Part α) where inter a b := (· ∩ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Union α] : Union (Part α) where union a b := (· ∪ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [SDiff α] : SDiff (Part α) where sdiff a b := (· \ ·) <$> a <*> b
section
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorems to unfold definitions
theorem mul_def [Mul α] (a b : Part α) : a * b = bind a fun y ↦ map (y * ·) b := rfl
theorem one_def [One α] : (1 : Part α) = some 1 := rfl
theorem inv_def [Inv α] (a : Part α) : a⁻¹ = Part.map (· ⁻¹) a := rfl
theorem div_def [Div α] (a b : Part α) : a / b = bind a fun y => map (y / ·) b := rfl
theorem mod_def [Mod α] (a b : Part α) : a % b = bind a fun y => map (y % ·) b := rfl
theorem append_def [Append α] (a b : Part α) : a ++ b = bind a fun y => map (y ++ ·) b := rfl
theorem inter_def [Inter α] (a b : Part α) : a ∩ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∩ ·) b := rfl
theorem union_def [Union α] (a b : Part α) : a ∪ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∪ ·) b := rfl
theorem sdiff_def [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) : a \ b = bind a fun y => map (y \ ·) b := rfl
end
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one [One α] : (1 : α) ∈ (1 : Part α) :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.one_mem_one Part.one_mem_one
#align part.zero_mem_zero Part.zero_mem_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma * mb ∈ a * b := ⟨⟨ha.1, hb.1⟩, by simp only [← ha.2, ← hb.2]; rfl⟩
#align part.mul_mem_mul Part.mul_mem_mul
#align part.add_mem_add Part.add_mem_add
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_mul_dom Part.left_dom_of_mul_dom
#align part.left_dom_of_add_dom Part.left_dom_of_add_dom
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_mul_dom Part.right_dom_of_mul_dom
#align part.right_dom_of_add_dom Part.right_dom_of_add_dom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_get_eq [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a * b)) :
(a * b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mul_dom hab) * b.get (right_dom_of_mul_dom hab) := rfl
#align part.mul_get_eq Part.mul_get_eq
#align part.add_get_eq Part.add_get_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem some_mul_some [Mul α] (a b : α) : some a * some b = some (a * b) := by simp [mul_def]
#align part.some_mul_some Part.some_mul_some
#align part.some_add_some Part.some_add_some
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv [Inv α] (a : Part α) (ma : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) : ma⁻¹ ∈ a⁻¹ := by
simp [inv_def]; aesop
#align part.inv_mem_inv Part.inv_mem_inv
#align part.neg_mem_neg Part.neg_mem_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_some [Inv α] (a : α) : (some a)⁻¹ = some a⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align part.inv_some Part.inv_some
#align part.neg_some Part.neg_some
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div [Div α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma / mb ∈ a / b := by simp [div_def]; aesop
#align part.div_mem_div Part.div_mem_div
#align part.sub_mem_sub Part.sub_mem_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_div_dom Part.left_dom_of_div_dom
#align part.left_dom_of_sub_dom Part.left_dom_of_sub_dom
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_div_dom Part.right_dom_of_div_dom
#align part.right_dom_of_sub_dom Part.right_dom_of_sub_dom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_get_eq [Div α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a / b)) :
(a / b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_div_dom hab) / b.get (right_dom_of_div_dom hab) := by
simp [div_def]; aesop
#align part.div_get_eq Part.div_get_eq
#align part.sub_get_eq Part.sub_get_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem some_div_some [Div α] (a b : α) : some a / some b = some (a / b) := by simp [div_def]
#align part.some_div_some Part.some_div_some
#align part.some_sub_some Part.some_sub_some
theorem mod_mem_mod [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma % mb ∈ a % b := by simp [mod_def]; aesop
#align part.mod_mem_mod Part.mod_mem_mod
theorem left_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_mod_dom Part.left_dom_of_mod_dom
theorem right_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_mod_dom Part.right_dom_of_mod_dom
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 795 | 797 | theorem mod_get_eq [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a % b)) :
(a % b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mod_dom hab) % b.get (right_dom_of_mod_dom hab) := by |
simp [mod_def]; aesop
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import topology.uniform_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"195fcd60ff2bfe392543bceb0ec2adcdb472db4c"
/-!
# Uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups. Many concepts directly
generalize to uniform spaces, e.g.
* uniform continuity (in this file)
* completeness (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* extension of uniform continuous functions to complete spaces (in `UniformEmbedding.lean`)
* totally bounded sets (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* totally bounded complete sets are compact (in `Cauchy.lean`)
A uniform structure on a type `X` is a filter `𝓤 X` on `X × X` satisfying some conditions
which makes it reasonable to say that `∀ᶠ (p : X × X) in 𝓤 X, ...` means
"for all p.1 and p.2 in X close enough, ...". Elements of this filter are called entourages
of `X`. The two main examples are:
* If `X` is a metric space, `V ∈ 𝓤 X ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ⊆ V`
* If `G` is an additive topological group, `V ∈ 𝓤 G ↔ ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G), {p | p.2 - p.1 ∈ U} ⊆ V`
Those examples are generalizations in two different directions of the elementary example where
`X = ℝ` and `V ∈ 𝓤 ℝ ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | |p.2 - p.1| < ε } ⊆ V` which features both the topological
group structure on `ℝ` and its metric space structure.
Each uniform structure on `X` induces a topology on `X` characterized by
> `nhds_eq_comap_uniformity : ∀ {x : X}, 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) (𝓤 X)`
where `Prod.mk x : X → X × X := (fun y ↦ (x, y))` is the partial evaluation of the product
constructor.
The dictionary with metric spaces includes:
* an upper bound for `dist x y` translates into `(x, y) ∈ V` for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`
* a ball `ball x r` roughly corresponds to `UniformSpace.ball x V := {y | (x, y) ∈ V}`
for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`, but the later is more general (it includes in
particular both open and closed balls for suitable `V`).
In particular we have:
`isOpen_iff_ball_subset {s : Set X} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ball x V ⊆ s`
The triangle inequality is abstracted to a statement involving the composition of relations in `X`.
First note that the triangle inequality in a metric space is equivalent to
`∀ (x y z : X) (r r' : ℝ), dist x y ≤ r → dist y z ≤ r' → dist x z ≤ r + r'`.
Then, for any `V` and `W` with type `Set (X × X)`, the composition `V ○ W : Set (X × X)` is
defined as `{ p : X × X | ∃ z, (p.1, z) ∈ V ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ W }`.
In the metric space case, if `V = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r }` and `W = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r' }`
then the triangle inequality, as reformulated above, says `V ○ W` is contained in
`{p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r + r'}` which is the entourage associated to the radius `r + r'`.
In general we have `mem_ball_comp (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) : z ∈ ball x (V ○ W)`.
Note that this discussion does not depend on any axiom imposed on the uniformity filter,
it is simply captured by the definition of composition.
The uniform space axioms ask the filter `𝓤 X` to satisfy the following:
* every `V ∈ 𝓤 X` contains the diagonal `idRel = { p | p.1 = p.2 }`. This abstracts the fact
that `dist x x ≤ r` for every non-negative radius `r` in the metric space case and also that
`x - x` belongs to every neighborhood of zero in the topological group case.
* `V ∈ 𝓤 X → Prod.swap '' V ∈ 𝓤 X`. This is tightly related the fact that `dist x y = dist y x`
in a metric space, and to continuity of negation in the topological group case.
* `∀ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ∃ W ∈ 𝓤 X, W ○ W ⊆ V`. In the metric space case, it corresponds
to cutting the radius of a ball in half and applying the triangle inequality.
In the topological group case, it comes from continuity of addition at `(0, 0)`.
These three axioms are stated more abstractly in the definition below, in terms of
operations on filters, without directly manipulating entourages.
## Main definitions
* `UniformSpace X` is a uniform space structure on a type `X`
* `UniformContinuous f` is a predicate saying a function `f : α → β` between uniform spaces
is uniformly continuous : `∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ (x : α × α) in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r`
In this file we also define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## Implementation notes
There is already a theory of relations in `Data/Rel.lean` where the main definition is
`def Rel (α β : Type*) := α → β → Prop`.
The relations used in the current file involve only one type, but this is not the reason why
we don't reuse `Data/Rel.lean`. We use `Set (α × α)`
instead of `Rel α α` because we really need sets to use the filter library, and elements
of filters on `α × α` have type `Set (α × α)`.
The structure `UniformSpace X` bundles a uniform structure on `X`, a topology on `X` and
an assumption saying those are compatible. This may not seem mathematically reasonable at first,
but is in fact an instance of the forgetful inheritance pattern. See Note [forgetful inheritance]
below.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
/-- The identity relation, or the graph of the identity function -/
def idRel {α : Type*} :=
{ p : α × α | p.1 = p.2 }
#align id_rel idRel
@[simp]
theorem mem_idRel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @idRel α ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_id_rel mem_idRel
@[simp]
theorem idRel_subset {s : Set (α × α)} : idRel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s := by
simp [subset_def]
#align id_rel_subset idRel_subset
/-- The composition of relations -/
def compRel (r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)) :=
{ p : α × α | ∃ z : α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂ }
#align comp_rel compRel
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Uniformity] infixl:62 " ○ " => compRel
open Uniformity
@[simp]
theorem mem_compRel {α : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)} {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ r₁ ○ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_comp_rel mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem swap_idRel : Prod.swap '' idRel = @idRel α :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simpa [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap] using eq_comm
#align swap_id_rel swap_idRel
theorem Monotone.compRel [Preorder β] {f g : β → Set (α × α)} (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ○ g x := fun _ _ h _ ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
#align monotone.comp_rel Monotone.compRel
@[mono]
theorem compRel_mono {f g h k : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : f ⊆ h) (h₂ : g ⊆ k) : f ○ g ⊆ h ○ k :=
fun _ ⟨z, h, h'⟩ => ⟨z, h₁ h, h₂ h'⟩
#align comp_rel_mono compRel_mono
theorem prod_mk_mem_compRel {a b c : α} {s t : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ s ○ t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
#align prod_mk_mem_comp_rel prod_mk_mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem id_compRel {r : Set (α × α)} : idRel ○ r = r :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp
#align id_comp_rel id_compRel
theorem compRel_assoc {r s t : Set (α × α)} : r ○ s ○ t = r ○ (s ○ t) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩; simp only [mem_compRel]; tauto
#align comp_rel_assoc compRel_assoc
theorem left_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ t) : s ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨_x, y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨y, xy_in, h <| rfl⟩
#align left_subset_comp_rel left_subset_compRel
theorem right_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : t ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨x, _y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨x, h <| rfl, xy_in⟩
#align right_subset_comp_rel right_subset_compRel
theorem subset_comp_self {s : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
left_subset_compRel h
#align subset_comp_self subset_comp_self
theorem subset_iterate_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) (n : ℕ) :
t ⊆ (s ○ ·)^[n] t := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing t
exacts [Subset.rfl, (right_subset_compRel h).trans ihn]
#align subset_iterate_comp_rel subset_iterate_compRel
/-- The relation is invariant under swapping factors. -/
def SymmetricRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Prop :=
Prod.swap ⁻¹' V = V
#align symmetric_rel SymmetricRel
/-- The maximal symmetric relation contained in a given relation. -/
def symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Set (α × α) :=
V ∩ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V
#align symmetrize_rel symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetric_symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : SymmetricRel (symmetrizeRel V) := by
simp [SymmetricRel, symmetrizeRel, preimage_inter, inter_comm, ← preimage_comp]
#align symmetric_symmetrize_rel symmetric_symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetrizeRel_subset_self (V : Set (α × α)) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ V :=
sep_subset _ _
#align symmetrize_rel_subset_self symmetrizeRel_subset_self
@[mono]
theorem symmetrize_mono {V W : Set (α × α)} (h : V ⊆ W) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ symmetrizeRel W :=
inter_subset_inter h <| preimage_mono h
#align symmetrize_mono symmetrize_mono
theorem SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ V ↔ (y, x) ∈ V :=
Set.ext_iff.1 hV (y, x)
#align symmetric_rel.mk_mem_comm SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm
theorem SymmetricRel.eq {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' U = U :=
hU
#align symmetric_rel.eq SymmetricRel.eq
theorem SymmetricRel.inter {U V : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) (hV : SymmetricRel V) :
SymmetricRel (U ∩ V) := by rw [SymmetricRel, preimage_inter, hU.eq, hV.eq]
#align symmetric_rel.inter SymmetricRel.inter
/-- This core description of a uniform space is outside of the type class hierarchy. It is useful
for constructions of uniform spaces, when the topology is derived from the uniform space. -/
structure UniformSpace.Core (α : Type u) where
/-- The uniformity filter. Once `UniformSpace` is defined, `𝓤 α` (`_root_.uniformity`) becomes the
normal form. -/
uniformity : Filter (α × α)
/-- Every set in the uniformity filter includes the diagonal. -/
refl : 𝓟 idRel ≤ uniformity
/-- If `s ∈ uniformity`, then `Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ∈ uniformity`. -/
symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
/-- For every set `u ∈ uniformity`, there exists `v ∈ uniformity` such that `v ○ v ⊆ u`. -/
comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
#align uniform_space.core UniformSpace.Core
protected theorem UniformSpace.Core.comp_mem_uniformity_sets {c : Core α} {s : Set (α × α)}
(hs : s ∈ c.uniformity) : ∃ t ∈ c.uniformity, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| c.comp hs
/-- An alternative constructor for `UniformSpace.Core`. This version unfolds various
`Filter`-related definitions. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : Filter (α × α)) (refl : ∀ r ∈ U, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, Prod.swap ⁻¹' r ∈ U) (comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, t ○ t ⊆ r) :
UniformSpace.Core α :=
⟨U, fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm, fun _r ru =>
let ⟨_s, hs, hsr⟩ := comp _ ru
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) hsr⟩
#align uniform_space.core.mk' UniformSpace.Core.mk'
/-- Defining a `UniformSpace.Core` from a filter basis satisfying some uniformity-like axioms. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis {α : Type u} (B : FilterBasis (α × α))
(refl : ∀ r ∈ B, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r) (symm : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ Prod.swap ⁻¹' r)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ○ t ⊆ r) : UniformSpace.Core α where
uniformity := B.filter
refl := B.hasBasis.ge_iff.mpr fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 <| refl _ ru
symm := (B.hasBasis.tendsto_iff B.hasBasis).mpr symm
comp := (HasBasis.le_basis_iff (B.hasBasis.lift' (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id))
B.hasBasis).2 comp
#align uniform_space.core.mk_of_basis UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis
/-- A uniform space generates a topological space -/
def UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) :
TopologicalSpace α :=
.mkOfNhds fun x ↦ .comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity
#align uniform_space.core.to_topological_space UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace
theorem UniformSpace.Core.ext :
∀ {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace.Core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align uniform_space.core_eq UniformSpace.Core.ext
theorem UniformSpace.Core.nhds_toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : Core α) (x : α) :
@nhds α u.toTopologicalSpace x = comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity := by
apply TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun _ ↦ (basis_sets _).comap _)
· exact fun a U hU ↦ u.refl hU rfl
· intro a U hU
rcases u.comp_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with b hb
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with c hc
exact hVU ⟨b, hb, hc⟩
-- the topological structure is embedded in the uniform structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- A uniform space is a generalization of the "uniform" topological aspects of a
metric space. It consists of a filter on `α × α` called the "uniformity", which
satisfies properties analogous to the reflexivity, symmetry, and triangle properties
of a metric.
A metric space has a natural uniformity, and a uniform space has a natural topology.
A topological group also has a natural uniformity, even when it is not metrizable. -/
class UniformSpace (α : Type u) extends TopologicalSpace α where
/-- The uniformity filter. -/
protected uniformity : Filter (α × α)
/-- If `s ∈ uniformity`, then `Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ∈ uniformity`. -/
protected symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
/-- For every set `u ∈ uniformity`, there exists `v ∈ uniformity` such that `v ○ v ⊆ u`. -/
protected comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
/-- The uniformity agrees with the topology: the neighborhoods filter of each point `x`
is equal to `Filter.comap (Prod.mk x) (𝓤 α)`. -/
protected nhds_eq_comap_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) uniformity
#align uniform_space UniformSpace
#noalign uniform_space.mk' -- Can't be a `match_pattern`, so not useful anymore
/-- The uniformity is a filter on α × α (inferred from an ambient uniform space
structure on α). -/
def uniformity (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Filter (α × α) :=
@UniformSpace.uniformity α _
#align uniformity uniformity
/-- Notation for the uniformity filter with respect to a non-standard `UniformSpace` instance. -/
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤[" u "]" => @uniformity _ u
@[inherit_doc] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: should we drop the `uniformity` def?
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤" => uniformity
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace` from a `u : UniformSpace.Core` and a `TopologicalSpace` structure
that is equal to `u.toTopologicalSpace`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCoreEq {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := t
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq UniformSpace.ofCoreEq
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace` from a `UniformSpace.Core`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCore {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofCoreEq u _ rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core UniformSpace.ofCore
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace.Core` from a `UniformSpace`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.toCore (u : UniformSpace α) : UniformSpace.Core α where
__ := u
refl := by
rintro U hU ⟨x, y⟩ (rfl : x = y)
have : Prod.mk x ⁻¹' U ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact preimage_mem_comap hU
convert mem_of_mem_nhds this
theorem UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace (u : UniformSpace α) :
u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by
rw [u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u.toCore.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace
/-- Build a `UniformSpace` from a `UniformSpace.Core` and a compatible topology.
Use `UniformSpace.mk` instead to avoid proving
the unnecessary assumption `UniformSpace.Core.refl`.
The main constructor used to use a different compatibility assumption.
This definition was created as a step towards porting to a new definition.
Now the main definition is ported,
so this constructor will be removed in a few months. -/
@[deprecated UniformSpace.mk (since := "2024-03-20")]
def UniformSpace.ofNhdsEqComap (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (_t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : ∀ x, 𝓝 x = u.uniformity.comap (Prod.mk x)) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := h
@[ext]
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u₁] = 𝓤[u₂]) : u₁ = u₂ := by
have : u₁.toTopologicalSpace = u₂.toTopologicalSpace := TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [u₁.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u₂.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact congr_arg (comap _) h
cases u₁; cases u₂; congr
#align uniform_space_eq UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext_iff {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} :
u₁ = u₂ ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤[u₁] ↔ s ∈ 𝓤[u₂] :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore (u : UniformSpace α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace) : .ofCoreEq u.toCore t h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq_to_core UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore
/-- Replace topology in a `UniformSpace` instance with a propositionally (but possibly not
definitionally) equal one. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.replaceTopology {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := i
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
#align uniform_space.replace_topology UniformSpace.replaceTopology
theorem UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : u.replaceTopology h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.replace_topology_eq UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq
-- Porting note: rfc: use `UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis`? This will change defeq here and there
/-- Define a `UniformSpace` using a "distance" function. The function can be, e.g., the
distance in a (usual or extended) metric space or an absolute value on a ring. -/
def UniformSpace.ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [OrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
UniformSpace α :=
.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ r > 0, 𝓟 { x | d x.1 x.2 < r }
refl := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => principal_mono.2 <| idRel_subset.2 fun x => by simpa [refl]
symm := tendsto_iInf_iInf fun r => tendsto_iInf_iInf fun _ => tendsto_principal_principal.2
fun x hx => by rwa [mem_setOf, symm]
comp := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => let ⟨δ, h0, hδr⟩ := half r hr; le_principal_iff.2 <|
mem_of_superset
(mem_lift' <| mem_iInf_of_mem δ <| mem_iInf_of_mem h0 <| mem_principal_self _)
fun (x, z) ⟨y, h₁, h₂⟩ => (triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (hδr _ h₁ _ h₂) }
#align uniform_space.of_fun UniformSpace.ofFun
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(h₀ : ∃ x : β, 0 < x) (d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
𝓤[.ofFun d refl symm triangle half].HasBasis ((0 : β) < ·) (fun ε => { x | d x.1 x.2 < ε }) :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun ε₁ h₁ ε₂ h₂ => ⟨min ε₁ ε₂, lt_min h₁ h₂, fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_left _ _),
fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_right _ _)⟩) h₀
#align uniform_space.has_basis_of_fun UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem nhds_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap (Prod.mk x) :=
UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x
#align nhds_eq_comap_uniformity nhds_eq_comap_uniformity
theorem isOpen_uniformity {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_prod_mk]
#align is_open_uniformity isOpen_uniformity
theorem refl_le_uniformity : 𝓟 idRel ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@UniformSpace.toCore α _).refl
#align refl_le_uniformity refl_le_uniformity
instance uniformity.neBot [Nonempty α] : NeBot (𝓤 α) :=
diagonal_nonempty.principal_neBot.mono refl_le_uniformity
#align uniformity.ne_bot uniformity.neBot
theorem refl_mem_uniformity {x : α} {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : (x, x) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h rfl
#align refl_mem_uniformity refl_mem_uniformity
theorem mem_uniformity_of_eq {x y : α} {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (hx : x = y) : (x, y) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h hx
#align mem_uniformity_of_eq mem_uniformity_of_eq
theorem symm_le_uniformity : map (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 _) ≤ 𝓤 _ :=
UniformSpace.symm
#align symm_le_uniformity symm_le_uniformity
theorem comp_le_uniformity : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
UniformSpace.comp
#align comp_le_uniformity comp_le_uniformity
theorem lift'_comp_uniformity : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s) = 𝓤 α :=
comp_le_uniformity.antisymm <| le_lift'.2 fun _s hs ↦ mem_of_superset hs <|
subset_comp_self <| idRel_subset.2 fun _ ↦ refl_mem_uniformity hs
theorem tendsto_swap_uniformity : Tendsto (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 α) :=
symm_le_uniformity
#align tendsto_swap_uniformity tendsto_swap_uniformity
theorem comp_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| comp_le_uniformity hs
#align comp_mem_uniformity_sets comp_mem_uniformity_sets
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction' n with n ihn generalizing s
· simpa
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
#align eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
#align eventually_uniformity_comp_subset eventually_uniformity_comp_subset
/-- Relation `fun f g ↦ Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is transitive. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_trans {l : Filter β} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : β → α}
(h₁₂ : Tendsto (fun x => (f₁ x, f₂ x)) l (𝓤 α))
(h₂₃ : Tendsto (fun x => (f₂ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α)) : Tendsto (fun x => (f₁ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α) := by
refine le_trans (le_lift'.2 fun s hs => mem_map.2 ?_) comp_le_uniformity
filter_upwards [mem_map.1 (h₁₂ hs), mem_map.1 (h₂₃ hs)] with x hx₁₂ hx₂₃ using ⟨_, hx₁₂, hx₂₃⟩
#align filter.tendsto.uniformity_trans Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_trans
/-- Relation `fun f g ↦ Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is symmetric. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_symm {l : Filter β} {f : β → α × α} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓤 α)) :
Tendsto (fun x => ((f x).2, (f x).1)) l (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.uniformity_symm Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_symm
/-- Relation `fun f g ↦ Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is reflexive. -/
theorem tendsto_diag_uniformity (f : β → α) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f x)) l (𝓤 α) := fun _s hs =>
mem_map.2 <| univ_mem' fun _ => refl_mem_uniformity hs
#align tendsto_diag_uniformity tendsto_diag_uniformity
theorem tendsto_const_uniformity {a : α} {f : Filter β} : Tendsto (fun _ => (a, a)) f (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_diag_uniformity (fun _ => a) f
#align tendsto_const_uniformity tendsto_const_uniformity
theorem symm_of_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have : preimage Prod.swap s ∈ 𝓤 α := symm_le_uniformity hs
⟨s ∩ preimage Prod.swap s, inter_mem hs this, fun _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₂, h₁⟩, inter_subset_left⟩
#align symm_of_uniformity symm_of_uniformity
theorem comp_symm_of_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀ {a b}, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
let ⟨t', ht', ht'₁, ht'₂⟩ := symm_of_uniformity ht₁
⟨t', ht', ht'₁ _ _, Subset.trans (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id ht'₂) ht₂⟩
#align comp_symm_of_uniformity comp_symm_of_uniformity
theorem uniformity_le_symm : 𝓤 α ≤ @Prod.swap α α <$> 𝓤 α := by
rw [map_swap_eq_comap_swap]; exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.le_comap
#align uniformity_le_symm uniformity_le_symm
theorem uniformity_eq_symm : 𝓤 α = @Prod.swap α α <$> 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm uniformity_le_symm symm_le_uniformity
#align uniformity_eq_symm uniformity_eq_symm
@[simp]
theorem comap_swap_uniformity : comap (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) = 𝓤 α :=
(congr_arg _ uniformity_eq_symm).trans <| comap_map Prod.swap_injective
#align comap_swap_uniformity comap_swap_uniformity
theorem symmetrize_mem_uniformity {V : Set (α × α)} (h : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : symmetrizeRel V ∈ 𝓤 α := by
apply (𝓤 α).inter_sets h
rw [← image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, uniformity_eq_symm]
exact image_mem_map h
#align symmetrize_mem_uniformity symmetrize_mem_uniformity
/-- Symmetric entourages form a basis of `𝓤 α` -/
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun s : Set (α × α) => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun t t_in =>
⟨symmetrizeRel t, symmetrize_mem_uniformity t_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel t,
symmetrizeRel_subset_self t⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_symmetric UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric
theorem uniformity_lift_le_swap {g : Set (α × α) → Filter β} {f : Filter β} (hg : Monotone g)
(h : ((𝓤 α).lift fun s => g (preimage Prod.swap s)) ≤ f) : (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ f :=
calc
(𝓤 α).lift g ≤ (Filter.map (@Prod.swap α α) <| 𝓤 α).lift g :=
lift_mono uniformity_le_symm le_rfl
_ ≤ _ := by rw [map_lift_eq2 hg, image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact h
#align uniformity_lift_le_swap uniformity_lift_le_swap
theorem uniformity_lift_le_comp {f : Set (α × α) → Filter β} (h : Monotone f) :
((𝓤 α).lift fun s => f (s ○ s)) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f :=
calc
((𝓤 α).lift fun s => f (s ○ s)) = ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s).lift f := by
rw [lift_lift'_assoc]
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id
· exact h
_ ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f := lift_mono comp_le_uniformity le_rfl
#align uniformity_lift_le_comp uniformity_lift_le_comp
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem comp3_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, t ○ (t ○ t) ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_t', ht', ht's⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
let ⟨t, ht, htt'⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets ht'
⟨t, ht, (compRel_mono ((subset_comp_self (refl_le_uniformity ht)).trans htt') htt').trans ht's⟩
/-- See also `comp3_mem_uniformity`. -/
theorem comp_le_uniformity3 : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ (s ○ s)) ≤ 𝓤 α := fun _ h =>
let ⟨_t, htU, ht⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity h
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' htU) ht
#align comp_le_uniformity3 comp_le_uniformity3
/-- See also `comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets`. -/
theorem comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨w, w_in, w_sub⟩ : ∃ w ∈ 𝓤 α, w ○ w ⊆ s := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
use symmetrizeRel w, symmetrize_mem_uniformity w_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel w
have : symmetrizeRel w ⊆ w := symmetrizeRel_subset_self w
calc symmetrizeRel w ○ symmetrizeRel w
_ ⊆ w ○ w := by mono
_ ⊆ s := w_sub
#align comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
theorem subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
subset_comp_self (refl_le_uniformity h)
#align subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity
theorem comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨w, w_in, _, w_sub⟩
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets w_in with ⟨t, t_in, t_symm, t_sub⟩
use t, t_in, t_symm
have : t ⊆ t ○ t := subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity t_in
-- Porting note: Needed the following `have`s to make `mono` work
have ht := Subset.refl t
have hw := Subset.refl w
calc
t ○ t ○ t ⊆ w ○ t := by mono
_ ⊆ w ○ (t ○ t) := by mono
_ ⊆ w ○ w := by mono
_ ⊆ s := w_sub
#align comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
/-- The ball around `(x : β)` with respect to `(V : Set (β × β))`. Intended to be
used for `V ∈ 𝓤 β`, but this is not needed for the definition. Recovers the
notions of metric space ball when `V = {p | dist p.1 p.2 < r }`. -/
def UniformSpace.ball (x : β) (V : Set (β × β)) : Set β :=
Prod.mk x ⁻¹' V
#align uniform_space.ball UniformSpace.ball
open UniformSpace (ball)
theorem UniformSpace.mem_ball_self (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : x ∈ ball x V :=
refl_mem_uniformity hV
#align uniform_space.mem_ball_self UniformSpace.mem_ball_self
/-- The triangle inequality for `UniformSpace.ball` -/
theorem mem_ball_comp {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y z} (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) :
z ∈ ball x (V ○ W) :=
prod_mk_mem_compRel h h'
#align mem_ball_comp mem_ball_comp
theorem ball_subset_of_comp_subset {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y} (h : x ∈ ball y W) (h' : W ○ W ⊆ V) :
ball x W ⊆ ball y V := fun _z z_in => h' (mem_ball_comp h z_in)
#align ball_subset_of_comp_subset ball_subset_of_comp_subset
theorem ball_mono {V W : Set (β × β)} (h : V ⊆ W) (x : β) : ball x V ⊆ ball x W :=
preimage_mono h
#align ball_mono ball_mono
theorem ball_inter (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) = ball x V ∩ ball x W :=
preimage_inter
#align ball_inter ball_inter
theorem ball_inter_left (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) ⊆ ball x V :=
ball_mono inter_subset_left x
#align ball_inter_left ball_inter_left
theorem ball_inter_right (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) ⊆ ball x W :=
ball_mono inter_subset_right x
#align ball_inter_right ball_inter_right
theorem mem_ball_symmetry {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y} :
x ∈ ball y V ↔ y ∈ ball x V :=
show (x, y) ∈ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V ↔ (x, y) ∈ V by
unfold SymmetricRel at hV
rw [hV]
#align mem_ball_symmetry mem_ball_symmetry
theorem ball_eq_of_symmetry {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x} :
ball x V = { y | (y, x) ∈ V } := by
ext y
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hV]
exact Iff.rfl
#align ball_eq_of_symmetry ball_eq_of_symmetry
theorem mem_comp_of_mem_ball {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y z : β} (hV : SymmetricRel V)
(hx : x ∈ ball z V) (hy : y ∈ ball z W) : (x, y) ∈ V ○ W := by
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hV] at hx
exact ⟨z, hx, hy⟩
#align mem_comp_of_mem_ball mem_comp_of_mem_ball
theorem UniformSpace.isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align uniform_space.is_open_ball UniformSpace.isOpen_ball
theorem UniformSpace.isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) :
IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
theorem mem_comp_comp {V W M : Set (β × β)} (hW' : SymmetricRel W) {p : β × β} :
p ∈ V ○ M ○ W ↔ (ball p.1 V ×ˢ ball p.2 W ∩ M).Nonempty := by
cases' p with x y
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨w, hpw, hwz⟩, hzy⟩
exact ⟨(w, z), ⟨hpw, by rwa [mem_ball_symmetry hW']⟩, hwz⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨w, z⟩, ⟨w_in, z_in⟩, hwz⟩
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hW'] at z_in
exact ⟨z, ⟨w, w_in, hwz⟩, z_in⟩
#align mem_comp_comp mem_comp_comp
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_prod_mk]
#align mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right
theorem mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ { p : α × α | p.2 = x → p.1 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_symm, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right]
simp only [map_def, mem_map, preimage_setOf_eq, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap]
#align mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem {x : α} {T : Set α} (hx : x ∈ T) (S : Set α) :
𝓝[S] x = (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (T ×ˢ S)).comap (Prod.mk x) := by
simp [nhdsWithin, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, hx]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} (S : Set α) :
𝓝[S] x = (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (univ ×ˢ S)).comap (Prod.mk x) :=
nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem (mem_univ _) S
/-- See also `isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset`. -/
theorem isOpen_iff_ball_subset {s : Set α} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s := by
simp_rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap, ball]
#align is_open_iff_ball_subset isOpen_iff_ball_subset
theorem nhds_basis_uniformity' {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{x : α} : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p fun i => ball x (s i) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact h.comap (Prod.mk x)
#align nhds_basis_uniformity' nhds_basis_uniformity'
theorem nhds_basis_uniformity {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{x : α} : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p fun i => { y | (y, x) ∈ s i } := by
replace h := h.comap Prod.swap
rw [comap_swap_uniformity] at h
exact nhds_basis_uniformity' h
#align nhds_basis_uniformity nhds_basis_uniformity
theorem nhds_eq_comap_uniformity' {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap fun y => (y, x) :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_of_same_basis <| (𝓤 α).basis_sets.comap _
#align nhds_eq_comap_uniformity' nhds_eq_comap_uniformity'
theorem UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff {x : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap]
simp_rw [ball]
#align uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff
theorem UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhds (x : α) ⦃V : Set (α × α)⦄ (V_in : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ball x V ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff]
exact ⟨V, V_in, Subset.rfl⟩
#align uniform_space.ball_mem_nhds UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhds
theorem UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhdsWithin {x : α} {S : Set α} ⦃V : Set (α × α)⦄ (x_in : x ∈ S)
(V_in : V ∈ 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)) : ball x V ∈ 𝓝[S] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem x_in, mem_comap]
exact ⟨V, V_in, Subset.rfl⟩
theorem UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩
use symmetrizeRel V, symmetrize_mem_uniformity V_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel V
exact Subset.trans (ball_mono (symmetrizeRel_subset_self V) x) V_sub
· rintro ⟨V, V_in, _, V_sub⟩
exact ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩
#align uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff_symm UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds (x : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) (fun s : Set (α × α) => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s :=
⟨fun t => by simp [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm, and_assoc]⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_nhds UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds
open UniformSpace
theorem UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball {s : Set α} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ {V}, V ∈ 𝓤 α → SymmetricRel V → (s ∩ ball x V).Nonempty := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (hasBasis_nhds x), Set.Nonempty]
#align uniform_space.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball
theorem UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_ball {s : Set α} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ {V}, V ∈ 𝓤 α → (ball x V ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets)]
#align uniform_space.mem_closure_iff_ball UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_ball
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_nhds_prod UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).lift' (ball x) :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_biInf
#align nhds_eq_uniformity nhds_eq_uniformity
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity' {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).lift' fun s => { y | (y, x) ∈ s } :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_biInf
#align nhds_eq_uniformity' nhds_eq_uniformity'
theorem mem_nhds_left (x : α) {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : { y : α | (x, y) ∈ s } ∈ 𝓝 x :=
ball_mem_nhds x h
#align mem_nhds_left mem_nhds_left
theorem mem_nhds_right (y : α) {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : { x : α | (x, y) ∈ s } ∈ 𝓝 y :=
mem_nhds_left _ (symm_le_uniformity h)
#align mem_nhds_right mem_nhds_right
theorem exists_mem_nhds_ball_subset_of_mem_nhds {a : α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ 𝓝 a) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 a, ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a' ∈ V, UniformSpace.ball a' t ⊆ U :=
let ⟨t, ht, htU⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 h)
⟨_, mem_nhds_left a ht, t, ht, fun a₁ h₁ a₂ h₂ => @htU (a, a₂) ⟨a₁, h₁, h₂⟩ rfl⟩
#align exists_mem_nhds_ball_subset_of_mem_nhds exists_mem_nhds_ball_subset_of_mem_nhds
theorem tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : Tendsto (fun a' => (a', a)) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) := fun _ =>
mem_nhds_right a
#align tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity
theorem tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : Tendsto (fun a' => (a, a')) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) := fun _ =>
mem_nhds_left a
#align tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity
theorem lift_nhds_left {x : α} {g : Set α → Filter β} (hg : Monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift fun s : Set (α × α) => g (ball x s) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_lift_eq2 hg]
simp_rw [ball, Function.comp]
#align lift_nhds_left lift_nhds_left
theorem lift_nhds_right {x : α} {g : Set α → Filter β} (hg : Monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift fun s : Set (α × α) => g { y | (y, x) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', comap_lift_eq2 hg]
simp_rw [Function.comp, preimage]
#align lift_nhds_right lift_nhds_right
theorem nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 b = (𝓤 α).lift fun s : Set (α × α) =>
(𝓤 α).lift' fun t => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ t } := by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity', nhds_eq_uniformity, prod_lift'_lift']
exacts [rfl, monotone_preimage, monotone_preimage]
#align nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
#align nhds_eq_uniformity_prod nhds_eq_uniformity_prod
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
#align nhdset_of_mem_uniformity nhdset_of_mem_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
#align nhds_le_uniformity nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
#align supr_nhds_le_uniformity iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
#align nhds_set_diagonal_le_uniformity nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
#align closure_eq_uniformity closure_eq_uniformity
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
#align uniformity_has_basis_closed uniformity_hasBasis_closed
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
#align uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_closure Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
#align uniformity_has_basis_closure uniformity_hasBasis_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun V₁ V₂ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
#align closure_eq_inter_uniformity closure_eq_inter_uniformity
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun s hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
#align uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
#align interior_mem_uniformity interior_mem_uniformity
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
#align mem_uniformity_is_closed mem_uniformity_isClosed
theorem isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
#align is_open_iff_open_ball_subset isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
#align dense.bUnion_uniformity_ball Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
#align uniformity_has_basis_open uniformity_hasBasis_open
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
#align filter.has_basis.mem_uniformity_iff Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ SymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
#align uniformity_has_basis_open_symmetric uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
#align comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, SymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
#align uniform_space.has_seq_basis UniformSpace.has_seq_basis
end
theorem Filter.HasBasis.biInter_biUnion_ball {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : HasBasis (𝓤 α) p U) (s : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (_ : p i), ⋃ x ∈ s, ball x (U i)) = closure s := by
ext x
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (nhds_basis_uniformity h), ball]
#align filter.has_basis.bInter_bUnion_ball Filter.HasBasis.biInter_biUnion_ball
/-! ### Uniform continuity -/
/-- A function `f : α → β` is *uniformly continuous* if `(f x, f y)` tends to the diagonal
as `(x, y)` tends to the diagonal. In other words, if `x` is sufficiently close to `y`, then
`f x` is close to `f y` no matter where `x` and `y` are located in `α`. -/
def UniformContinuous [UniformSpace β] (f : α → β) :=
Tendsto (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 β)
#align uniform_continuous UniformContinuous
/-- Notation for uniform continuity with respect to non-standard `UniformSpace` instances. -/
scoped[Uniformity] notation "UniformContinuous[" u₁ ", " u₂ "]" => @UniformContinuous _ _ u₁ u₂
/-- A function `f : α → β` is *uniformly continuous* on `s : Set α` if `(f x, f y)` tends to
the diagonal as `(x, y)` tends to the diagonal while remaining in `s ×ˢ s`.
In other words, if `x` is sufficiently close to `y`, then `f x` is close to
`f y` no matter where `x` and `y` are located in `s`. -/
def UniformContinuousOn [UniformSpace β] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
Tendsto (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s)) (𝓤 β)
#align uniform_continuous_on UniformContinuousOn
theorem uniformContinuous_def [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, { x : α × α | (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
Iff.rfl
#align uniform_continuous_def uniformContinuous_def
theorem uniformContinuous_iff_eventually [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ x : α × α in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r :=
Iff.rfl
#align uniform_continuous_iff_eventually uniformContinuous_iff_eventually
theorem uniformContinuousOn_univ [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuousOn f univ ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, UniformContinuous, univ_prod_univ, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align uniform_continuous_on_univ uniformContinuousOn_univ
theorem uniformContinuous_of_const [UniformSpace β] {c : α → β} (h : ∀ a b, c a = c b) :
UniformContinuous c :=
have : (fun x : α × α => (c x.fst, c x.snd)) ⁻¹' idRel = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun ⟨a, b⟩ => h a b
le_trans (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| by simp [comap_principal, this, univ_mem]) refl_le_uniformity
#align uniform_continuous_of_const uniformContinuous_of_const
theorem uniformContinuous_id : UniformContinuous (@id α) := tendsto_id
#align uniform_continuous_id uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_const [UniformSpace β] {b : β} : UniformContinuous fun _ : α => b :=
uniformContinuous_of_const fun _ _ => rfl
#align uniform_continuous_const uniformContinuous_const
nonrec theorem UniformContinuous.comp [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hf : UniformContinuous f) : UniformContinuous (g ∘ f) :=
hg.comp hf
#align uniform_continuous.comp UniformContinuous.comp
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuous_iff {ι'} [UniformSpace β] {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set (α × α)} (ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {q : ι' → Prop} {t : ι' → Set (β × β)}
(hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis q t) {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ i, q i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ t i :=
(ha.tendsto_iff hb).trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall]
#align filter.has_basis.uniform_continuous_iff Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuous_iff
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuousOn_iff {ι'} [UniformSpace β] {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set (α × α)} (ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {q : ι' → Prop} {t : ι' → Set (β × β)}
(hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis q t) {f : α → β} {S : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f S ↔
∀ i, q i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ S → ∀ y, y ∈ S → (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ t i :=
((ha.inf_principal (S ×ˢ S)).tendsto_iff hb).trans <| by
simp_rw [Prod.forall, Set.inter_comm (s _), forall_mem_comm, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod, and_imp]
#align filter.has_basis.uniform_continuous_on_iff Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuousOn_iff
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Inf (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
#align infi_uniformity iInf_uniformity
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
#align inf_uniformity inf_uniformity
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
#align inhabited_uniform_space inhabitedUniformSpace
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
#align inhabited_uniform_space_core inhabitedUniformSpaceCore
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp]
#align uniform_space.comap UniformSpace.comap
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
#align uniformity_comap uniformity_comap
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
#align uniform_space_comap_id uniformSpace_comap_id
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
#align uniform_space.comap_comap UniformSpace.comap_comap
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
#align uniform_space.comap_inf UniformSpace.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
#align uniform_space.comap_infi UniformSpace.comap_iInf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
#align uniform_space.comap_mono UniformSpace.comap_mono
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align uniform_continuous_iff uniformContinuous_iff
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
#align le_iff_uniform_continuous_id le_iff_uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
#align uniform_continuous_comap uniformContinuous_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
#align uniform_continuous_comap' uniformContinuous_comap'
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
#align to_nhds_mono UniformSpace.to_nhds_mono
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
#align to_topological_space_mono UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
#align to_topological_space_comap UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_comap
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
#align to_topological_space_bot UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
#align to_topological_space_top UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_top
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
#align to_topological_space_infi UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_iInf
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
#align to_topological_space_Inf UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_sInf
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
#align to_topological_space_inf UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_inf
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
#align uniform_continuous.continuous UniformContinuous.continuous
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
#align ulift.uniform_space ULift.uniformSpace
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- Porting note: renamed for dot notation; add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align uniform_continuous_inf_rng UniformContinuous.inf_rng
-- Porting note: renamed for dot notation
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
#align uniform_continuous_inf_dom_left UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left
-- Porting note: renamed for dot notation
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
#align uniform_continuous_inf_dom_right UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
#align uniform_continuous_Inf_dom uniformContinuous_sInf_dom
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
#align uniform_continuous_Inf_rng uniformContinuous_sInf_rng
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
#align uniform_continuous_infi_dom uniformContinuous_iInf_dom
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
#align uniform_continuous_infi_rng uniformContinuous_iInf_rng
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
#align discrete_topology_of_discrete_uniformity discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
#align uniform_continuous_of_mul uniformContinuous_ofMul
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
#align uniform_continuous_to_mul uniformContinuous_toMul
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
#align uniform_continuous_of_add uniformContinuous_ofAdd
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
#align uniform_continuous_to_add uniformContinuous_toAdd
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
#align uniformity_additive uniformity_additive
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
#align uniformity_multiplicative uniformity_multiplicative
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
#align uniformity_subtype uniformity_subtype
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
#align uniformity_set_coe uniformity_setCoe
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prod_map, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
#align uniform_continuous_subtype_val uniformContinuous_subtype_val
#align uniform_continuous_subtype_coe uniformContinuous_subtype_val
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
#align uniform_continuous.subtype_mk UniformContinuous.subtype_mk
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
#align uniform_continuous_on_iff_restrict uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
#align tendsto_of_uniform_continuous_subtype tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
#align uniform_continuous_on.continuous_on UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
#align uniformity_mul_opposite uniformity_mulOpposite
#align uniformity_add_opposite uniformity_addOpposite
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
#align comap_uniformity_mul_opposite comap_uniformity_mulOpposite
#align comap_uniformity_add_opposite comap_uniformity_addOpposite
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
#align mul_opposite.uniform_continuous_unop MulOpposite.uniformContinuous_unop
#align add_opposite.uniform_continuous_unop AddOpposite.uniformContinuous_unop
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
#align mul_opposite.uniform_continuous_op MulOpposite.uniformContinuous_op
#align add_opposite.uniform_continuous_op AddOpposite.uniformContinuous_op
end MulOpposite
section Prod
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
#align uniformity_prod uniformity_prod
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
dsimp [SProd.sprod]
rw [uniformity_prod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, comap_comap]; rfl
#align uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
#align uniformity_prod_eq_prod uniformity_prod_eq_prod
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
#align mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invariant mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant
theorem mem_uniform_prod [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {a : Set (α × α)}
{b : Set (β × β)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{ p : (α × β) × α × β | (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ a ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ b } ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap ha) (preimage_mem_comap hb)
#align mem_uniform_prod mem_uniform_prod
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
#align tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
#align tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
#align uniform_continuous_fst uniformContinuous_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
#align uniform_continuous_snd uniformContinuous_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prod_mk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
#align uniform_continuous.prod_mk UniformContinuous.prod_mk
theorem UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prod_mk uniformContinuous_const)
#align uniform_continuous.prod_mk_left UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prod_mk uniformContinuous_id)
#align uniform_continuous.prod_mk_right UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prod_map [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prod_mk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
#align uniform_continuous.prod_map UniformContinuous.prod_map
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
#align to_topological_space_prod toTopologicalSpace_prod
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2;
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
#align uniform_continuous_inf_dom_left₂ uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2;
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
#align uniform_continuous_inf_dom_right₂ uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs;
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
#align uniform_continuous_Inf_dom₂ uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
#align uniform_continuous₂ UniformContinuous₂
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
#align uniform_continuous₂_def uniformContinuous₂_def
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
#align uniform_continuous₂.uniform_continuous UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
#align uniform_continuous₂_curry uniformContinuous₂_curry
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
#align uniform_continuous₂.comp UniformContinuous₂.comp
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prod_map hgb)
#align uniform_continuous₂.bicompl UniformContinuous₂.bicompl
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
#align to_topological_space_subtype toTopologicalSpace_subtype
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
#noalign uniform_space.core.sum
#noalign uniformity_sum_of_open_aux
#noalign open_of_uniformity_sum_aux
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun s hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
#align sum.uniform_space Sum.instUniformSpace
@[reducible, deprecated (since := "2024-02-15")] alias Sum.uniformSpace := Sum.instUniformSpace
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
#align union_mem_uniformity_sum union_mem_uniformity_sum
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
#align sum.uniformity Sum.uniformity
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Compact sets in uniform spaces
-/
section Compact
open UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α] {K : Set α}
/-- Let `c : ι → Set α` be an open cover of a compact set `s`. Then there exists an entourage
`n` such that for each `x ∈ s` its `n`-neighborhood is contained in some `c i`. -/
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma {ι : Sort*} {U : ι → Set α} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hopen : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hcover : K ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ K, ∃ i, ball x V ⊆ U i := by
have : ∀ x ∈ K, ∃ i, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x (V ○ V) ⊆ U i := fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hcover hx)
rw [← (hopen i).mem_nhds_iff, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, ← lift'_comp_uniformity] at hi
exact ⟨i, (((basis_sets _).lift' <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).comap _).mem_iff.1 hi⟩
choose ind W hW hWU using this
rcases hK.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x hx ↦ ball x (W x hx)) (fun x hx ↦ ball_mem_nhds _ (hW x hx))
with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨⋂ x ∈ t, W x x.2, (biInter_finset_mem _).2 fun x _ ↦ hW x x.2, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (ht hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact ⟨ind y y.2, fun z hz ↦ hWU _ _ ⟨x, hxy, mem_iInter₂.1 hz _ hyt⟩⟩
#align lebesgue_number_lemma lebesgue_number_lemma
/-- Let `U : ι → Set α` be an open cover of a compact set `K`.
Then there exists an entourage `V`
such that for each `x ∈ K` its `V`-neighborhood is included in some `U i`.
Moreover, one can choose an entourage from a given basis. -/
protected theorem Filter.HasBasis.lebesgue_number_lemma {ι' ι : Sort*} {p : ι' → Prop}
{V : ι' → Set (α × α)} {U : ι → Set α} (hbasis : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p V) (hK : IsCompact K)
(hopen : ∀ j, IsOpen (U j)) (hcover : K ⊆ ⋃ j, U j) :
∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ x ∈ K, ∃ j, ball x (V i) ⊆ U j := by
refine (hbasis.exists_iff ?_).1 (lebesgue_number_lemma hK hopen hcover)
exact fun s t hst ht x hx ↦ (ht x hx).imp fun i hi ↦ Subset.trans (ball_mono hst _) hi
/-- Let `c : Set (Set α)` be an open cover of a compact set `s`. Then there exists an entourage
`n` such that for each `x ∈ s` its `n`-neighborhood is contained in some `t ∈ c`. -/
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hopen : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) (hcover : K ⊆ ⋃₀ S) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ K, ∃ s ∈ S, ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion] at hcover
simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma hK (by simpa) hcover
#align lebesgue_number_lemma_sUnion lebesgue_number_lemma_sUnion
/-- If `K` is a compact set in a uniform space and `{V i | p i}` is a basis of entourages,
then `{⋃ x ∈ K, UniformSpace.ball x (V i) | p i}` is a basis of `𝓝ˢ K`.
Here "`{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l`" means `Filter.HasBasis l p s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_basis_uniformity {p : ι → Prop} {V : ι → Set (α × α)}
(hbasis : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p V) (hK : IsCompact K) :
(𝓝ˢ K).HasBasis p fun i => ⋃ x ∈ K, ball x (V i) where
mem_iff' U := by
constructor
· intro H
have HKU : K ⊆ ⋃ _ : Unit, interior U := by
simpa only [iUnion_const, subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet] using H
obtain ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩ : ∃ i, p i ∧ ⋃ x ∈ K, ball x (V i) ⊆ interior U := by
simpa using hbasis.lebesgue_number_lemma hK (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior) HKU
exact ⟨i, hpi, hi.trans interior_subset⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩
refine mem_of_superset (bUnion_mem_nhdsSet fun x _ ↦ ?_) hi
exact ball_mem_nhds _ <| hbasis.mem_of_mem hpi
#align is_compact.nhds_set_basis_uniformity IsCompact.nhdsSet_basis_uniformity
-- TODO: move to a separate file, golf using the regularity of a uniform space.
theorem Disjoint.exists_uniform_thickening {A B : Set α} (hA : IsCompact A) (hB : IsClosed B)
(h : Disjoint A B) : ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, Disjoint (⋃ x ∈ A, ball x V) (⋃ x ∈ B, ball x V) := by
have : Bᶜ ∈ 𝓝ˢ A := hB.isOpen_compl.mem_nhdsSet.mpr h.le_compl_right
rw [(hA.nhdsSet_basis_uniformity (Filter.basis_sets _)).mem_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨U, hU, hUAB⟩
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨V, hV, Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun x => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion₂]
rintro ⟨a, ha, hxa⟩ ⟨b, hb, hxb⟩
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hVsymm] at hxa hxb
exact hUAB (mem_iUnion₂_of_mem ha <| hVU <| mem_comp_of_mem_ball hVsymm hxa hxb) hb
#align disjoint.exists_uniform_thickening Disjoint.exists_uniform_thickening
theorem Disjoint.exists_uniform_thickening_of_basis {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
(hU : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {A B : Set α} (hA : IsCompact A) (hB : IsClosed B)
(h : Disjoint A B) : ∃ i, p i ∧ Disjoint (⋃ x ∈ A, ball x (s i)) (⋃ x ∈ B, ball x (s i)) := by
rcases h.exists_uniform_thickening hA hB with ⟨V, hV, hVAB⟩
rcases hU.mem_iff.1 hV with ⟨i, hi, hiV⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, hVAB.mono (iUnion₂_mono fun a _ => ball_mono hiV a)
(iUnion₂_mono fun b _ => ball_mono hiV b)⟩
#align disjoint.exists_uniform_thickening_of_basis Disjoint.exists_uniform_thickening_of_basis
/-- A useful consequence of the Lebesgue number lemma: given any compact set `K` contained in an
open set `U`, we can find an (open) entourage `V` such that the ball of size `V` about any point of
`K` is contained in `U`. -/
theorem lebesgue_number_of_compact_open {K U : Set α} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hU : IsOpen U) (hKU : K ⊆ U) : ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ∀ x ∈ K, UniformSpace.ball x V ⊆ U :=
let ⟨V, ⟨hV, hVo⟩, hVU⟩ :=
(hK.nhdsSet_basis_uniformity uniformity_hasBasis_open).mem_iff.1 (hU.mem_nhdsSet.2 hKU)
⟨V, hV, hVo, iUnion₂_subset_iff.1 hVU⟩
#align lebesgue_number_of_compact_open lebesgue_number_of_compact_open
end Compact
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
#align uniform.tendsto_nhds_right Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
#align uniform.tendsto_nhds_left Uniform.tendsto_nhds_left
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
#align uniform.continuous_at_iff'_right Uniform.continuousAt_iff'_right
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
#align uniform.continuous_at_iff'_left Uniform.continuousAt_iff'_left
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prod_map' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prod_mk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align uniform.continuous_at_iff_prod Uniform.continuousAt_iff_prod
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,934 | 1,936 | theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by |
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_mod self_sub_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ico_div_zsmul toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ioc_div_zsmul toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ico_mod toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ioc_mod toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_iff toIcoMod_eq_iff
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_iff toIocMod_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_left toIcoDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_left toIocDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_left toIcoMod_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_left toIocMod_apply_left
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_right toIcoDiv_apply_right
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_right toIocDiv_apply_right
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_right toIcoMod_apply_right
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_right toIocMod_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul toIcoDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul' toIcoDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul toIocDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul' toIocDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_add toIcoDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_add toIocDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul' toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul toIocDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul' toIocDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right toIcoDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right' toIcoDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right toIocDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right' toIocDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ico_div_add_left toIcoDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ico_div_add_left' toIcoDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left toIocDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left' toIocDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub toIcoDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub' toIcoDiv_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub toIocDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub' toIocDiv_sub'
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add' toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add'
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add' toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add'
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
#align to_Ico_div_neg toIcoDiv_neg
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ico_div_neg' toIcoDiv_neg'
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_neg toIocDiv_neg
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ioc_div_neg' toIocDiv_neg'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul toIcoMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul' toIcoMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul toIocMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul' toIocMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add toIcoMod_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add' toIcoMod_zsmul_add'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_zsmul_add toIocMod_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_mod_zsmul_add' toIocMod_zsmul_add'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_zsmul toIcoMod_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_zsmul' toIcoMod_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_zsmul toIocMod_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_zsmul' toIocMod_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right toIcoMod_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right' toIcoMod_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_right toIocMod_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_right' toIocMod_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_left toIcoMod_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_left' toIcoMod_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_left toIocMod_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right', add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_left' toIocMod_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_sub toIcoMod_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a - p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_sub' toIcoMod_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub toIocMod_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a - p) b = toIocMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub' toIocMod_sub'
theorem toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - c) = toIcoMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_eq_sub toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub
theorem toIocMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - c) = toIocMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_eq_sub toIocMod_sub_eq_sub
theorem toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a (b + c) = toIcoMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right_eq_add toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 547 | 549 | theorem toIocMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIocMod hp a (b + c) = toIocMod hp (a - c) b + c := by |
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
#align_import data.polynomial.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The main defs here are `eval₂`, `eval`, and `map`.
We give several lemmas about their interaction with each other and with module operations.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar ring
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target -/
irreducible_def eval₂ (p : R[X]) : S :=
p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e
#align polynomial.eval₂ Polynomial.eval₂
theorem eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval₂_def]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum
theorem eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {f g : R →+* S} {s t : S}
{φ ψ : R[X]} : f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ := by
rintro rfl rfl rfl; rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_congr Polynomial.eval₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero,
mul_one, sum, Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff,
RingHom.map_zero, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_zero Polynomial.eval₂_at_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 0 := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_zero Polynomial.eval₂_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_C Polynomial.eval₂_C
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X Polynomial.eval₂_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = f r * x ^ n := by
simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_monomial Polynomial.eval₂_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n).eval₂ f x = x ^ n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial]
convert eval₂_monomial f x (n := n) (r := 1)
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_pow Polynomial.eval₂_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum]
apply sum_add_index <;> simp [add_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_add Polynomial.eval₂_add
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_one : (1 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 1 := by rw [← C_1, eval₂_C, f.map_one]
#align polynomial.eval₂_one Polynomial.eval₂_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval₂ f x = bit0 (p.eval₂ f x) := by rw [bit0, eval₂_add, bit0]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit0 Polynomial.eval₂_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval₂ f x = bit1 (p.eval₂ f x) := by
rw [bit1, eval₂_add, eval₂_bit0, eval₂_one, bit1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit1 Polynomial.eval₂_bit1
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_smul (g : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (x : S) {s : R} :
eval₂ g x (s • p) = g s * eval₂ g x p := by
have A : p.natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := Nat.lt_succ_self _
have B : (s • p).natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := (natDegree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt A
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_over_range' _ _ _ A, sum_over_range' _ _ _ B] <;>
simp [mul_sum, mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.eval₂_smul Polynomial.eval₂_smul
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C_X : eval₂ C X p = p :=
Polynomial.induction_on' p (fun p q hp hq => by simp [hp, hq]) fun n x => by
rw [eval₂_monomial, ← smul_X_eq_monomial, C_mul']
#align polynomial.eval₂_C_X Polynomial.eval₂_C_X
/-- `eval₂AddMonoidHom (f : R →+* S) (x : S)` is the `AddMonoidHom` from
`R[X]` to `S` obtained by evaluating the pushforward of `p` along `f` at `x`. -/
@[simps]
def eval₂AddMonoidHom : R[X] →+ S where
toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom_apply Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).eval₂ f x = n := by
induction' n with n ih
-- Porting note: `Nat.zero_eq` is required.
· simp only [eval₂_zero, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· rw [n.cast_succ, eval₂_add, ih, eval₂_one, n.cast_succ]
#align polynomial.eval₂_nat_cast Polynomial.eval₂_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval₂_nat_cast := eval₂_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
lemma eval₂_ofNat {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (f : R →+* S) (a : S) :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R[X])).eval₂ f a = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp [OfNat.ofNat]
variable [Semiring T]
theorem eval₂_sum (p : T[X]) (g : ℕ → T → R[X]) (x : S) :
(p.sum g).eval₂ f x = p.sum fun n a => (g n a).eval₂ f x := by
let T : R[X] →+ S :=
{ toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' := fun p q => eval₂_add _ _ }
have A : ∀ y, eval₂ f x y = T y := fun y => rfl
simp only [A]
rw [sum, map_sum, sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_sum Polynomial.eval₂_sum
theorem eval₂_list_sum (l : List R[X]) (x : S) : eval₂ f x l.sum = (l.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_list_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) l
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_sum Polynomial.eval₂_list_sum
theorem eval₂_multiset_sum (s : Multiset R[X]) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x s.sum = (s.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) s
#align polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum
theorem eval₂_finset_sum (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R[X]) (x : S) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).eval₂ f x = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).eval₂ f x :=
map_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum
theorem eval₂_ofFinsupp {f : R →+* S} {x : S} {p : R[ℕ]} :
eval₂ f x (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = liftNC (↑f) (powersHom S x) p := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, toFinsupp_sum, support, coeff]
rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_of_finsupp Polynomial.eval₂_ofFinsupp
theorem eval₂_mul_noncomm (hf : ∀ k, Commute (f <| q.coeff k) x) :
eval₂ f x (p * q) = eval₂ f x p * eval₂ f x q := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩; rcases q with ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff] at hf
simp only [← ofFinsupp_mul, eval₂_ofFinsupp]
exact liftNC_mul _ _ p q fun {k n} _hn => (hf k).pow_right n
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm Polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul_X : eval₂ f x (p * X) = eval₂ f x p * x := by
refine _root_.trans (eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun k => ?_) (by rw [eval₂_X])
rcases em (k = 1) with (rfl | hk)
· simp
· simp [coeff_X_of_ne_one hk]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_X Polynomial.eval₂_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_mul : eval₂ f x (X * p) = eval₂ f x p * x := by rw [X_mul, eval₂_mul_X]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_mul Polynomial.eval₂_X_mul
theorem eval₂_mul_C' (h : Commute (f a) x) : eval₂ f x (p * C a) = eval₂ f x p * f a := by
rw [eval₂_mul_noncomm, eval₂_C]
intro k
by_cases hk : k = 0
· simp only [hk, h, coeff_C_zero, coeff_C_ne_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero hk, RingHom.map_zero, Commute.zero_left]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_C' Polynomial.eval₂_mul_C'
theorem eval₂_list_prod_noncomm (ps : List R[X])
(hf : ∀ p ∈ ps, ∀ (k), Commute (f <| coeff p k) x) :
eval₂ f x ps.prod = (ps.map (Polynomial.eval₂ f x)).prod := by
induction' ps using List.reverseRecOn with ps p ihp
· simp
· simp only [List.forall_mem_append, List.forall_mem_singleton] at hf
simp [eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ hf.2, ihp hf.1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_prod_noncomm Polynomial.eval₂_list_prod_noncomm
/-- `eval₂` as a `RingHom` for noncommutative rings -/
@[simps]
def eval₂RingHom' (f : R →+* S) (x : S) (hf : ∀ a, Commute (f a) x) : R[X] →+* S where
toFun := eval₂ f x
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_mul' _p q := eval₂_mul_noncomm f x fun k => hf <| coeff q k
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_ring_hom' Polynomial.eval₂RingHom'
end
/-!
We next prove that eval₂ is multiplicative
as long as target ring is commutative
(even if the source ring is not).
-/
section Eval₂
section
variable [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
theorem eval₂_eq_sum_range :
p.eval₂ f x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (p.natDegree + 1), f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i :=
_root_.trans (congr_arg _ p.as_sum_range)
(_root_.trans (eval₂_finset_sum f _ _ x) (congr_arg _ (by simp)))
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range
theorem eval₂_eq_sum_range' (f : R →+* S) {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.natDegree < n) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x p = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i := by
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, p.sum_over_range' _ _ hn]
intro i
rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range' Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range'
end
section
variable [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul : (p * q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x * q.eval₂ f x :=
eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun _k => Commute.all _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul Polynomial.eval₂_mul
theorem eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left (q : R[X]) (hp : p.eval₂ f x = 0) : (p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [eval₂_mul f x]
exact mul_eq_zero_of_left hp (q.eval₂ f x)
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left Polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left
theorem eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right (p : R[X]) (hq : q.eval₂ f x = 0) : (p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [eval₂_mul f x]
exact mul_eq_zero_of_right (p.eval₂ f x) hq
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right Polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right
/-- `eval₂` as a `RingHom` -/
def eval₂RingHom (f : R →+* S) (x : S) : R[X] →+* S :=
{ eval₂AddMonoidHom f x with
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _
map_mul' := fun _ _ => eval₂_mul _ _ }
#align polynomial.eval₂_ring_hom Polynomial.eval₂RingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_eval₂RingHom (f : R →+* S) (x) : ⇑(eval₂RingHom f x) = eval₂ f x :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_eval₂_ring_hom Polynomial.coe_eval₂RingHom
theorem eval₂_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x ^ n :=
(eval₂RingHom _ _).map_pow _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_pow Polynomial.eval₂_pow
theorem eval₂_dvd : p ∣ q → eval₂ f x p ∣ eval₂ f x q :=
(eval₂RingHom f x).map_dvd
#align polynomial.eval₂_dvd Polynomial.eval₂_dvd
theorem eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero (h : p ∣ q) (h0 : eval₂ f x p = 0) :
eval₂ f x q = 0 :=
zero_dvd_iff.mp (h0 ▸ eval₂_dvd f x h)
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero Polynomial.eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero
theorem eval₂_list_prod (l : List R[X]) (x : S) : eval₂ f x l.prod = (l.map (eval₂ f x)).prod :=
map_list_prod (eval₂RingHom f x) l
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_prod Polynomial.eval₂_list_prod
end
end Eval₂
section Eval
variable {x : R}
/-- `eval x p` is the evaluation of the polynomial `p` at `x` -/
def eval : R → R[X] → R :=
eval₂ (RingHom.id _)
#align polynomial.eval Polynomial.eval
theorem eval_eq_sum : p.eval x = p.sum fun e a => a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval, eval₂_eq_sum]
rfl
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum Polynomial.eval_eq_sum
theorem eval_eq_sum_range {p : R[X]} (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (p.natDegree + 1), p.coeff i * x ^ i := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, sum_over_range]; simp
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range
theorem eval_eq_sum_range' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.natDegree < n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, p.coeff i * x ^ i := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, p.sum_over_range' _ _ hn]; simp
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range' Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range'
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_apply {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (r : R) :
p.eval₂ f (f r) = f (p.eval r) := by
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval_eq_sum, sum, sum, map_sum f]
simp only [f.map_mul, f.map_pow]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_apply Polynomial.eval₂_at_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_one {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) : p.eval₂ f 1 = f (p.eval 1) := by
convert eval₂_at_apply (p := p) f 1
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_one Polynomial.eval₂_at_one
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_natCast {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) :
p.eval₂ f n = f (p.eval n) := by
convert eval₂_at_apply (p := p) f n
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_nat_cast Polynomial.eval₂_at_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval₂_at_nat_cast := eval₂_at_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_ofNat {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
p.eval₂ f (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = f (p.eval (OfNat.ofNat n)) := by
simp [OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem eval_C : (C a).eval x = a :=
eval₂_C _ _
#align polynomial.eval_C Polynomial.eval_C
@[simp]
theorem eval_natCast {n : ℕ} : (n : R[X]).eval x = n := by simp only [← C_eq_natCast, eval_C]
#align polynomial.eval_nat_cast Polynomial.eval_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_nat_cast := eval_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
lemma eval_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : R) :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R[X])).eval a = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp only [OfNat.ofNat, eval_natCast]
@[simp]
theorem eval_X : X.eval x = x :=
eval₂_X _ _
#align polynomial.eval_X Polynomial.eval_X
@[simp]
theorem eval_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).eval x = a * x ^ n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
#align polynomial.eval_monomial Polynomial.eval_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval x = 0 :=
eval₂_zero _ _
#align polynomial.eval_zero Polynomial.eval_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval_add : (p + q).eval x = p.eval x + q.eval x :=
eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.eval_add Polynomial.eval_add
@[simp]
theorem eval_one : (1 : R[X]).eval x = 1 :=
eval₂_one _ _
#align polynomial.eval_one Polynomial.eval_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval x = bit0 (p.eval x) :=
eval₂_bit0 _ _
#align polynomial.eval_bit0 Polynomial.eval_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval x = bit1 (p.eval x) :=
eval₂_bit1 _ _
#align polynomial.eval_bit1 Polynomial.eval_bit1
@[simp]
theorem eval_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S) (p : R[X])
(x : R) : (s • p).eval x = s • p.eval x := by
rw [← smul_one_smul R s p, eval, eval₂_smul, RingHom.id_apply, smul_one_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_smul Polynomial.eval_smul
@[simp]
theorem eval_C_mul : (C a * p).eval x = a * p.eval x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q ph qh =>
simp only [mul_add, eval_add, ph, qh]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp only [mul_assoc, C_mul_monomial, eval_monomial]
#align polynomial.eval_C_mul Polynomial.eval_C_mul
/-- A reformulation of the expansion of (1 + y)^d:
$$(d + 1) (1 + y)^d - (d + 1)y^d = \sum_{i = 0}^d {d + 1 \choose i} \cdot i \cdot y^{i - 1}.$$
-/
theorem eval_monomial_one_add_sub [CommRing S] (d : ℕ) (y : S) :
eval (1 + y) (monomial d (d + 1 : S)) - eval y (monomial d (d + 1 : S)) =
∑ x_1 ∈ range (d + 1), ↑((d + 1).choose x_1) * (↑x_1 * y ^ (x_1 - 1)) := by
have cast_succ : (d + 1 : S) = ((d.succ : ℕ) : S) := by simp only [Nat.cast_succ]
rw [cast_succ, eval_monomial, eval_monomial, add_comm, add_pow]
-- Porting note: `apply_congr` hadn't been ported yet, so `congr` & `ext` is used.
conv_lhs =>
congr
· congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [one_pow, mul_one, mul_comm]
rw [sum_range_succ, mul_add, Nat.choose_self, Nat.cast_one, one_mul, add_sub_cancel_right,
mul_sum, sum_range_succ', Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, add_zero]
refine sum_congr rfl fun y _hy => ?_
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.succ_mul_choose_eq, Nat.cast_mul,
Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align polynomial.eval_monomial_one_add_sub Polynomial.eval_monomial_one_add_sub
/-- `Polynomial.eval` as linear map -/
@[simps]
def leval {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun f := f.eval r
map_add' _f _g := eval_add
map_smul' c f := eval_smul c f r
#align polynomial.leval Polynomial.leval
#align polynomial.leval_apply Polynomial.leval_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval_natCast_mul {n : ℕ} : ((n : R[X]) * p).eval x = n * p.eval x := by
rw [← C_eq_natCast, eval_C_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_nat_cast_mul Polynomial.eval_natCast_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_nat_cast_mul := eval_natCast_mul
@[simp]
theorem eval_mul_X : (p * X).eval x = p.eval x * x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q ph qh =>
simp only [add_mul, eval_add, ph, qh]
| h_monomial n a =>
simp only [← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, eval_monomial, mul_one, pow_succ,
mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.eval_mul_X Polynomial.eval_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem eval_mul_X_pow {k : ℕ} : (p * X ^ k).eval x = p.eval x * x ^ k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ih]
#align polynomial.eval_mul_X_pow Polynomial.eval_mul_X_pow
theorem eval_sum (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → R[X]) (x : R) :
(p.sum f).eval x = p.sum fun n a => (f n a).eval x :=
eval₂_sum _ _ _ _
#align polynomial.eval_sum Polynomial.eval_sum
theorem eval_finset_sum (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R[X]) (x : R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).eval x = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).eval x :=
eval₂_finset_sum _ _ _ _
#align polynomial.eval_finset_sum Polynomial.eval_finset_sum
/-- `IsRoot p x` implies `x` is a root of `p`. The evaluation of `p` at `x` is zero -/
def IsRoot (p : R[X]) (a : R) : Prop :=
p.eval a = 0
#align polynomial.is_root Polynomial.IsRoot
instance IsRoot.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (IsRoot p a) := by
unfold IsRoot; infer_instance
#align polynomial.is_root.decidable Polynomial.IsRoot.decidable
@[simp]
theorem IsRoot.def : IsRoot p a ↔ p.eval a = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.is_root.def Polynomial.IsRoot.def
theorem IsRoot.eq_zero (h : IsRoot p x) : eval x p = 0 :=
h
#align polynomial.is_root.eq_zero Polynomial.IsRoot.eq_zero
theorem coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff p 0 = p.eval 0 :=
calc
coeff p 0 = coeff p 0 * 0 ^ 0 := by simp
_ = p.eval 0 := by
symm
rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact Finset.sum_eq_single _ (fun b _ hb => by simp [zero_pow hb]) (by simp)
#align polynomial.coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero Polynomial.coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero
theorem zero_isRoot_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero {p : R[X]} (hp : p.coeff 0 = 0) : IsRoot p 0 := by
rwa [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero] at hp
#align polynomial.zero_is_root_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero Polynomial.zero_isRoot_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero
theorem IsRoot.dvd {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p q : R[X]} {x : R} (h : p.IsRoot x)
(hpq : p ∣ q) : q.IsRoot x := by
rwa [IsRoot, eval, eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero _ _ hpq]
#align polynomial.is_root.dvd Polynomial.IsRoot.dvd
theorem not_isRoot_C (r a : R) (hr : r ≠ 0) : ¬IsRoot (C r) a := by simpa using hr
#align polynomial.not_is_root_C Polynomial.not_isRoot_C
theorem eval_surjective (x : R) : Function.Surjective <| eval x := fun y => ⟨C y, eval_C⟩
#align polynomial.eval_surjective Polynomial.eval_surjective
end Eval
section Comp
/-- The composition of polynomials as a polynomial. -/
def comp (p q : R[X]) : R[X] :=
p.eval₂ C q
#align polynomial.comp Polynomial.comp
theorem comp_eq_sum_left : p.comp q = p.sum fun e a => C a * q ^ e := by rw [comp, eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.comp_eq_sum_left Polynomial.comp_eq_sum_left
@[simp]
theorem comp_X : p.comp X = p := by
simp only [comp, eval₂_def, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact sum_monomial_eq _
#align polynomial.comp_X Polynomial.comp_X
@[simp]
theorem X_comp : X.comp p = p :=
eval₂_X _ _
#align polynomial.X_comp Polynomial.X_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_C : p.comp (C a) = C (p.eval a) := by simp [comp, map_sum (C : R →+* _)]
#align polynomial.comp_C Polynomial.comp_C
@[simp]
theorem C_comp : (C a).comp p = C a :=
eval₂_C _ _
#align polynomial.C_comp Polynomial.C_comp
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp {n : ℕ} : (n : R[X]).comp p = n := by rw [← C_eq_natCast, C_comp]
#align polynomial.nat_cast_comp Polynomial.natCast_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_comp := natCast_comp
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_comp (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : R[X]).comp p = n :=
natCast_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero : p.comp (0 : R[X]) = C (p.eval 0) := by rw [← C_0, comp_C]
#align polynomial.comp_zero Polynomial.comp_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp : comp (0 : R[X]) p = 0 := by rw [← C_0, C_comp]
#align polynomial.zero_comp Polynomial.zero_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_one : p.comp 1 = C (p.eval 1) := by rw [← C_1, comp_C]
#align polynomial.comp_one Polynomial.comp_one
@[simp]
theorem one_comp : comp (1 : R[X]) p = 1 := by rw [← C_1, C_comp]
#align polynomial.one_comp Polynomial.one_comp
@[simp]
theorem add_comp : (p + q).comp r = p.comp r + q.comp r :=
eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.add_comp Polynomial.add_comp
@[simp]
theorem monomial_comp (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).comp p = C a * p ^ n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
#align polynomial.monomial_comp Polynomial.monomial_comp
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_comp : (p * X).comp r = p.comp r * r := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, add_mul, add_comp]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp only [pow_succ, mul_assoc, monomial_mul_X, monomial_comp]
#align polynomial.mul_X_comp Polynomial.mul_X_comp
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (X ^ k).comp p = p ^ k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, mul_X_comp, ih]
#align polynomial.X_pow_comp Polynomial.X_pow_comp
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (p * X ^ k).comp r = p.comp r * r ^ k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_X_comp]
#align polynomial.mul_X_pow_comp Polynomial.mul_X_pow_comp
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_comp : (C a * p).comp r = C a * p.comp r := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp [hp, hq, mul_add]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp [mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.C_mul_comp Polynomial.C_mul_comp
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mul_comp {n : ℕ} : ((n : R[X]) * p).comp r = n * p.comp r := by
rw [← C_eq_natCast, C_mul_comp]
#align polynomial.nat_cast_mul_comp Polynomial.natCast_mul_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_mul_comp := natCast_mul_comp
theorem mul_X_add_natCast_comp {n : ℕ} :
(p * (X + (n : R[X]))).comp q = p.comp q * (q + n) := by
rw [mul_add, add_comp, mul_X_comp, ← Nat.cast_comm, natCast_mul_comp, Nat.cast_comm, mul_add]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mul_X_add_nat_cast_comp Polynomial.mul_X_add_natCast_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias mul_X_add_nat_cast_comp := mul_X_add_natCast_comp
@[simp]
theorem mul_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (p q r : R[X]) :
(p * q).comp r = p.comp r * q.comp r :=
eval₂_mul _ _
#align polynomial.mul_comp Polynomial.mul_comp
@[simp]
theorem pow_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).comp q = p.comp q ^ n :=
(MonoidHom.mk (OneHom.mk (fun r : R[X] => r.comp q) one_comp) fun r s => mul_comp r s q).map_pow
p n
#align polynomial.pow_comp Polynomial.pow_comp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem bit0_comp : comp (bit0 p : R[X]) q = bit0 (p.comp q) := by simp only [bit0, add_comp]
#align polynomial.bit0_comp Polynomial.bit0_comp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem bit1_comp : comp (bit1 p : R[X]) q = bit1 (p.comp q) := by
simp only [bit1, add_comp, bit0_comp, one_comp]
#align polynomial.bit1_comp Polynomial.bit1_comp
@[simp]
theorem smul_comp [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S) (p q : R[X]) :
(s • p).comp q = s • p.comp q := by
rw [← smul_one_smul R s p, comp, comp, eval₂_smul, ← smul_eq_C_mul, smul_assoc, one_smul]
#align polynomial.smul_comp Polynomial.smul_comp
theorem comp_assoc {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (φ ψ χ : R[X]) :
(φ.comp ψ).comp χ = φ.comp (ψ.comp χ) := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on φ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
· intros
simp_all only [add_comp, mul_comp, C_comp, X_comp, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.comp_assoc Polynomial.comp_assoc
theorem coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree (hqd0 : natDegree q ≠ 0) :
coeff (p.comp q) (natDegree p * natDegree q) =
leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ^ natDegree p := by
rw [comp, eval₂_def, coeff_sum]
-- Porting note: `convert` → `refine`
refine Eq.trans (Finset.sum_eq_single p.natDegree ?h₀ ?h₁) ?h₂
case h₂ =>
simp only [coeff_natDegree, coeff_C_mul, coeff_pow_mul_natDegree]
case h₀ =>
intro b hbs hbp
refine coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (natDegree_mul_le.trans_lt ?_)
rw [natDegree_C, zero_add]
refine natDegree_pow_le.trans_lt ((mul_lt_mul_right (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hqd0)).mpr ?_)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hbs) hbp
case h₁ =>
simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align polynomial.coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree Polynomial.coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree
@[simp] lemma sum_comp (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → R[X]) (q : R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, p i).comp q = ∑ i ∈ s, (p i).comp q := Polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum _ _ _ _
end Comp
section Map
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S)
/-- `map f p` maps a polynomial `p` across a ring hom `f` -/
def map : R[X] → S[X] :=
eval₂ (C.comp f) X
#align polynomial.map Polynomial.map
@[simp]
theorem map_C : (C a).map f = C (f a) :=
eval₂_C _ _
#align polynomial.map_C Polynomial.map_C
@[simp]
theorem map_X : X.map f = X :=
eval₂_X _ _
#align polynomial.map_X Polynomial.map_X
@[simp]
theorem map_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).map f = monomial n (f a) := by
dsimp only [map]
rw [eval₂_monomial, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]; rfl
#align polynomial.map_monomial Polynomial.map_monomial
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : (0 : R[X]).map f = 0 :=
eval₂_zero _ _
#align polynomial.map_zero Polynomial.map_zero
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add : (p + q).map f = p.map f + q.map f :=
eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.map_add Polynomial.map_add
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : (1 : R[X]).map f = 1 :=
eval₂_one _ _
#align polynomial.map_one Polynomial.map_one
@[simp]
protected theorem map_mul : (p * q).map f = p.map f * q.map f := by
rw [map, eval₂_mul_noncomm]
exact fun k => (commute_X _).symm
#align polynomial.map_mul Polynomial.map_mul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul (r : R) : (r • p).map f = f r • p.map f := by
rw [map, eval₂_smul, RingHom.comp_apply, C_mul']
#align polynomial.map_smul Polynomial.map_smul
-- `map` is a ring-hom unconditionally, and theoretically the definition could be replaced,
-- but this turns out not to be easy because `p.map f` does not resolve to `Polynomial.map`
-- if `map` is a `RingHom` instead of a plain function; the elaborator does not try to coerce
-- to a function before trying field (dot) notation (this may be technically infeasible);
-- the relevant code is (both lines): https://github.com/leanprover-community/
-- lean/blob/487ac5d7e9b34800502e1ddf3c7c806c01cf9d51/src/frontends/lean/elaborator.cpp#L1876-L1913
/-- `Polynomial.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
def mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) : R[X] →+* S[X] where
toFun := Polynomial.map f
map_add' _ _ := Polynomial.map_add f
map_zero' := Polynomial.map_zero f
map_mul' _ _ := Polynomial.map_mul f
map_one' := Polynomial.map_one f
#align polynomial.map_ring_hom Polynomial.mapRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) : ⇑(mapRingHom f) = map f :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_map_ring_hom Polynomial.coe_mapRingHom
-- This is protected to not clash with the global `map_natCast`.
@[simp]
protected theorem map_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).map f = n :=
map_natCast (mapRingHom f) n
#align polynomial.map_nat_cast Polynomial.map_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias map_nat_cast := map_natCast
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : R[X]).map f = OfNat.ofNat n :=
show (n : R[X]).map f = n by rw [Polynomial.map_natCast]
#noalign polynomial.map_bit0
#noalign polynomial.map_bit1
--TODO rename to `map_dvd_map`
theorem map_dvd (f : R →+* S) {x y : R[X]} : x ∣ y → x.map f ∣ y.map f :=
(mapRingHom f).map_dvd
#align polynomial.map_dvd Polynomial.map_dvd
@[simp]
theorem coeff_map (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.map f) n = f (coeff p n) := by
rw [map, eval₂_def, coeff_sum, sum]
conv_rhs => rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, coeff_sum, sum, map_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _hx => ?_
simp only [RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
split_ifs <;> simp [f.map_zero]
#align polynomial.coeff_map Polynomial.coeff_map
/-- If `R` and `S` are isomorphic, then so are their polynomial rings. -/
@[simps!]
def mapEquiv (e : R ≃+* S) : R[X] ≃+* S[X] :=
RingEquiv.ofHomInv (mapRingHom (e : R →+* S)) (mapRingHom (e.symm : S →+* R)) (by ext <;> simp)
(by ext <;> simp)
#align polynomial.map_equiv Polynomial.mapEquiv
#align polynomial.map_equiv_apply Polynomial.mapEquiv_apply
#align polynomial.map_equiv_symm_apply Polynomial.mapEquiv_symm_apply
theorem map_map [Semiring T] (g : S →+* T) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).map g = p.map (g.comp f) :=
ext (by simp [coeff_map])
#align polynomial.map_map Polynomial.map_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : p.map (RingHom.id _) = p := by simp [Polynomial.ext_iff, coeff_map]
#align polynomial.map_id Polynomial.map_id
/-- The polynomial ring over a finite product of rings is isomorphic to
the product of polynomial rings over individual rings. -/
def piEquiv {ι} [Finite ι] (R : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Semiring (R i)] :
(∀ i, R i)[X] ≃+* ∀ i, (R i)[X] :=
.ofBijective (Pi.ringHom fun i ↦ mapRingHom (Pi.evalRingHom R i))
⟨fun p q h ↦ by ext n i; simpa using congr_arg (fun p ↦ coeff (p i) n) h,
fun p ↦ ⟨.ofFinsupp (.ofSupportFinite (fun n i ↦ coeff (p i) n) <|
(Set.finite_iUnion fun i ↦ (p i).support.finite_toSet).subset fun n hn ↦ by
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Finset.mem_coe, mem_support_iff, Function.mem_support] at hn ⊢
contrapose! hn; exact funext hn), by ext i n; exact coeff_map _ _⟩⟩
theorem eval₂_eq_eval_map {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = (p.map f).eval x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp [hp, hq]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map Polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map
theorem map_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (map f) := fun p q h =>
ext fun m => hf <| by rw [← coeff_map f, ← coeff_map f, h]
#align polynomial.map_injective Polynomial.map_injective
theorem map_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Function.Surjective (map f) := fun p =>
Polynomial.induction_on' p
(fun p q hp hq =>
let ⟨p', hp'⟩ := hp
let ⟨q', hq'⟩ := hq
⟨p' + q', by rw [Polynomial.map_add f, hp', hq']⟩)
fun n s =>
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := hf s
⟨monomial n r, by rw [map_monomial f, hr]⟩
#align polynomial.map_surjective Polynomial.map_surjective
theorem degree_map_le (p : R[X]) : degree (p.map f) ≤ degree p := by
refine (degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun m hm => ?_
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
simp [hm m le_rfl]
#align polynomial.degree_map_le Polynomial.degree_map_le
theorem natDegree_map_le (p : R[X]) : natDegree (p.map f) ≤ natDegree p :=
natDegree_le_natDegree (degree_map_le f p)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_map_le Polynomial.natDegree_map_le
variable {f}
protected theorem map_eq_zero_iff (hf : Function.Injective f) : p.map f = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff (mapRingHom f) (map_injective f hf)
#align polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff
protected theorem map_ne_zero_iff (hf : Function.Injective f) : p.map f ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
(Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff hf).not
#align polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
theorem map_monic_eq_zero_iff (hp : p.Monic) : p.map f = 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
⟨fun hfp x =>
calc
f x = f x * f p.leadingCoeff := by simp only [mul_one, hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
_ = f x * (p.map f).coeff p.natDegree := congr_arg _ (coeff_map _ _).symm
_ = 0 := by simp only [hfp, mul_zero, coeff_zero]
,
fun h => ext fun n => by simp only [h, coeff_map, coeff_zero]⟩
#align polynomial.map_monic_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.map_monic_eq_zero_iff
theorem map_monic_ne_zero (hp : p.Monic) [Nontrivial S] : p.map f ≠ 0 := fun h =>
f.map_one_ne_zero ((map_monic_eq_zero_iff hp).mp h _)
#align polynomial.map_monic_ne_zero Polynomial.map_monic_ne_zero
theorem degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S) (hf : f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0) :
degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
le_antisymm (degree_map_le f _) <| by
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 :=
leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mp fun hp0 => hf (_root_.trans (congr_arg _ hp0) f.map_zero)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp0]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_map]
exact hf
#align polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S) (hf : f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f hf)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_map_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero
theorem leadingCoeff_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S) (hf : f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map, natDegree_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f hf]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_map_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero
variable (f)
@[simp]
theorem mapRingHom_id : mapRingHom (RingHom.id R) = RingHom.id R[X] :=
RingHom.ext fun _x => map_id
#align polynomial.map_ring_hom_id Polynomial.mapRingHom_id
@[simp]
theorem mapRingHom_comp [Semiring T] (f : S →+* T) (g : R →+* S) :
(mapRingHom f).comp (mapRingHom g) = mapRingHom (f.comp g) :=
RingHom.ext <| Polynomial.map_map g f
#align polynomial.map_ring_hom_comp Polynomial.mapRingHom_comp
protected theorem map_list_prod (L : List R[X]) : L.prod.map f = (L.map <| map f).prod :=
Eq.symm <| List.prod_hom _ (mapRingHom f).toMonoidHom
#align polynomial.map_list_prod Polynomial.map_list_prod
@[simp]
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).map f = p.map f ^ n :=
(mapRingHom f).map_pow _ _
#align polynomial.map_pow Polynomial.map_pow
theorem mem_map_rangeS {p : S[X]} : p ∈ (mapRingHom f).rangeS ↔ ∀ n, p.coeff n ∈ f.rangeS := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩ n
rw [coe_mapRingHom, coeff_map]
exact Set.mem_range_self _
· intro h
rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow]
refine (mapRingHom f).rangeS.sum_mem ?_
intro i _hi
rcases h i with ⟨c, hc⟩
use C c * X ^ i
rw [coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, hc, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X]
#align polynomial.mem_map_srange Polynomial.mem_map_rangeS
theorem mem_map_range {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) {p : S[X]} :
p ∈ (mapRingHom f).range ↔ ∀ n, p.coeff n ∈ f.range :=
mem_map_rangeS f
#align polynomial.mem_map_range Polynomial.mem_map_range
theorem eval₂_map [Semiring T] (g : S →+* T) (x : T) :
(p.map f).eval₂ g x = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) x := by
rw [eval₂_eq_eval_map, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_map]
#align polynomial.eval₂_map Polynomial.eval₂_map
theorem eval_map (x : S) : (p.map f).eval x = p.eval₂ f x :=
(eval₂_eq_eval_map f).symm
#align polynomial.eval_map Polynomial.eval_map
protected theorem map_sum {ι : Type*} (g : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).map f = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).map f :=
map_sum (mapRingHom f) _ _
#align polynomial.map_sum Polynomial.map_sum
theorem map_comp (p q : R[X]) : map f (p.comp q) = (map f p).comp (map f q) :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (by simp only [map_C, forall_const, C_comp, eq_self_iff_true])
(by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [Polynomial.map_add, add_comp, forall_const,
imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true])
(by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, comp, forall_const,
eval₂_mul_X, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, map_X, Polynomial.map_mul])
#align polynomial.map_comp Polynomial.map_comp
@[simp]
theorem eval_zero_map (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).eval 0 = f (p.eval 0) := by
simp [← coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero]
#align polynomial.eval_zero_map Polynomial.eval_zero_map
@[simp]
theorem eval_one_map (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).eval 1 = f (p.eval 1) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, Polynomial.map_add, RingHom.map_add, eval_add]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp only [one_pow, mul_one, eval_monomial, map_monomial]
#align polynomial.eval_one_map Polynomial.eval_one_map
@[simp]
theorem eval_natCast_map (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p.map f).eval (n : S) = f (p.eval n) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, Polynomial.map_add, RingHom.map_add, eval_add]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp only [map_natCast f, eval_monomial, map_monomial, f.map_pow, f.map_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_nat_cast_map Polynomial.eval_natCast_map
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_nat_cast_map := eval_natCast_map
@[simp]
theorem eval_intCast_map {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (i : ℤ) :
(p.map f).eval (i : S) = f (p.eval i) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, Polynomial.map_add, RingHom.map_add, eval_add]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp only [map_intCast, eval_monomial, map_monomial, map_pow, map_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_int_cast_map Polynomial.eval_intCast_map
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_int_cast_map := eval_intCast_map
end Map
/-!
we have made `eval₂` irreducible from the start.
Perhaps we can make also `eval`, `comp`, and `map` irreducible too?
-/
section HomEval₂
variable [Semiring S] [Semiring T] (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) (p)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Eval.lean | 1,055 | 1,056 | theorem hom_eval₂ (x : S) : g (p.eval₂ f x) = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) (g x) := by |
rw [← eval₂_map, eval₂_at_apply, eval_map]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.typevec from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
#align typevec TypeVec
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
#align typevec.arrow TypeVec.Arrow
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
#align typevec.arrow.inhabited TypeVec.Arrow.inhabited
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
#align typevec.id TypeVec.id
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
#align typevec.comp TypeVec.comp
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.id_comp TypeVec.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.comp_id TypeVec.comp_id
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
#align typevec.comp_assoc TypeVec.comp_assoc
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
#align typevec.append1 TypeVec.append1
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
#align typevec.drop TypeVec.drop
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
#align typevec.last TypeVec.last
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
#align typevec.last.inhabited TypeVec.last.inhabited
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
#align typevec.drop_append1 TypeVec.drop_append1
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
#align typevec.drop_append1' TypeVec.drop_append1'
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
#align typevec.last_append1 TypeVec.last_append1
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
#align typevec.append1_drop_last TypeVec.append1_drop_last
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
#align typevec.append1_cases TypeVec.append1Cases
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
#align typevec.append1_cases_append1 TypeVec.append1_cases_append1
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
#align typevec.split_fun TypeVec.splitFun
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
#align typevec.append_fun TypeVec.appendFun
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
#align typevec.drop_fun TypeVec.dropFun
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
#align typevec.last_fun TypeVec.lastFun
-- Porting note: Lean wasn't able to infer the motive in term mode
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
#align typevec.nil_fun TypeVec.nilFun
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
-- Porting note: FIXME: congr_fun h₀ <;> ext1 ⟨⟩ <;> apply_assumption
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
#align typevec.eq_of_drop_last_eq TypeVec.eq_of_drop_last_eq
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.drop_fun_split_fun TypeVec.dropFun_splitFun
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
#align typevec.arrow.mp TypeVec.Arrow.mp
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
#align typevec.arrow.mpr TypeVec.Arrow.mpr
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
#align typevec.to_append1_drop_last TypeVec.toAppend1DropLast
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
#align typevec.from_append1_drop_last TypeVec.fromAppend1DropLast
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
#align typevec.last_fun_split_fun TypeVec.lastFun_splitFun
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.drop_fun_append_fun TypeVec.dropFun_appendFun
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
#align typevec.last_fun_append_fun TypeVec.lastFun_appendFun
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
#align typevec.split_drop_fun_last_fun TypeVec.split_dropFun_lastFun
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
#align typevec.split_fun_inj TypeVec.splitFun_inj
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
#align typevec.append_fun_inj TypeVec.appendFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
#align typevec.split_fun_comp TypeVec.splitFun_comp
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
#align typevec.append_fun_comp_split_fun TypeVec.appendFun_comp_splitFun
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
#align typevec.append_fun_comp TypeVec.appendFun_comp
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
#align typevec.append_fun_comp' TypeVec.appendFun_comp'
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext fun x => by apply Fin2.elim0 x -- Porting note: `by apply` is necessary?
#align typevec.nil_fun_comp TypeVec.nilFun_comp
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
#align typevec.append_fun_comp_id TypeVec.appendFun_comp_id
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
#align typevec.drop_fun_comp TypeVec.dropFun_comp
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
#align typevec.last_fun_comp TypeVec.lastFun_comp
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
#align typevec.append_fun_aux TypeVec.appendFun_aux
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
#align typevec.append_fun_id_id TypeVec.appendFun_id_id
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun a b => funext fun a => by apply Fin2.elim0 a⟩ -- Porting note: `by apply` necessary?
#align typevec.subsingleton0 TypeVec.subsingleton0
-- Porting note: `simp` attribute `TypeVec` moved to file `Tactic/Attr/Register.lean`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
#align typevec.cases_nil TypeVec.casesNil
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
#align typevec.cases_cons TypeVec.casesCons
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.cases_nil_append1 TypeVec.casesNil_append1
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
#align typevec.cases_cons_append1 TypeVec.casesCons_append1
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
#align typevec.typevec_cases_nil₃ TypeVec.typevecCasesNil₃
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
#align typevec.typevec_cases_cons₃ TypeVec.typevecCasesCons₃
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
#align typevec.typevec_cases_nil₂ TypeVec.typevecCasesNil₂
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
#align typevec.typevec_cases_cons₂ TypeVec.typevecCasesCons₂
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.typevec_cases_nil₂_append_fun TypeVec.typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
#align typevec.typevec_cases_cons₂_append_fun TypeVec.typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
#align typevec.pred_last TypeVec.PredLast
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
#align typevec.rel_last TypeVec.RelLast
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
#align typevec.repeat TypeVec.repeat
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
#align typevec.prod TypeVec.prod
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/- porting note: the order of universes in `const` is reversed w.r.t. mathlib3 -/
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
#align typevec.const TypeVec.const
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
#align typevec.repeat_eq TypeVec.repeatEq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
#align typevec.const_append1 TypeVec.const_append1
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
#align typevec.eq_nil_fun TypeVec.eq_nilFun
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
#align typevec.id_eq_nil_fun TypeVec.id_eq_nilFun
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
#align typevec.const_nil TypeVec.const_nil
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _ )
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
#align typevec.repeat_eq_append1 TypeVec.repeat_eq_append1
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
#align typevec.repeat_eq_nil TypeVec.repeat_eq_nil
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
#align typevec.pred_last' TypeVec.PredLast'
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
#align typevec.rel_last' TypeVec.RelLast'
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
#align typevec.curry TypeVec.Curry
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
#align typevec.curry.inhabited TypeVec.Curry.inhabited
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
#align typevec.drop_repeat TypeVec.dropRepeat
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
#align typevec.of_repeat TypeVec.ofRepeat
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih => erw [TypeVec.const, @ih (drop α) x]
#align typevec.const_iff_true TypeVec.const_iff_true
section
variable {α β γ : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) (r : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
#align typevec.prod.fst TypeVec.prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
#align typevec.prod.snd TypeVec.prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
#align typevec.prod.diag TypeVec.prod.diag
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
def prod.mk : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n} (i : Fin2 n), α i → β i → (α ⊗ β) i
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => mk (α := fun i => α i.fs) (β := fun i => β i.fs) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.mk
#align typevec.prod.mk TypeVec.prod.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.fst i (prod.mk i a b) = a := by
induction' i with _ _ _ i_ih
· simp_all only [prod.fst, prod.mk]
apply i_ih
#align typevec.prod_fst_mk TypeVec.prod_fst_mk
@[simp]
theorem prod_snd_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.snd i (prod.mk i a b) = b := by
induction' i with _ _ _ i_ih
· simp_all [prod.snd, prod.mk]
apply i_ih
#align typevec.prod_snd_mk TypeVec.prod_snd_mk
/-- `prod` is functorial -/
protected def prod.map : ∀ {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ β → α' ⟹ β' → α ⊗ α' ⟹ β ⊗ β'
| succ _, α, α', β, β', x, y, Fin2.fs _, a =>
@prod.map _ (drop α) (drop α') (drop β) (drop β') (dropFun x) (dropFun y) _ a
| succ _, _, _, _, _, x, y, Fin2.fz, a => (x _ a.1, y _ a.2)
#align typevec.prod.map TypeVec.prod.map
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗' " => TypeVec.prod.map
theorem fst_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = f ⊚ TypeVec.prod.fst := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
#align typevec.fst_prod_mk TypeVec.fst_prod_mk
theorem snd_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = g ⊚ TypeVec.prod.snd := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
#align typevec.snd_prod_mk TypeVec.snd_prod_mk
theorem fst_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
#align typevec.fst_diag TypeVec.fst_diag
theorem snd_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
#align typevec.snd_diag TypeVec.snd_diag
theorem repeatEq_iff_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i x y} :
ofRepeat (repeatEq α i (prod.mk _ x y)) ↔ x = y := by
induction' i with _ _ _ i_ih
· rfl
erw [repeatEq, i_ih]
#align typevec.repeat_eq_iff_eq TypeVec.repeatEq_iff_eq
/-- given a predicate vector `p` over vector `α`, `Subtype_ p` is the type of vectors
that contain an `α` that satisfies `p` -/
def Subtype_ : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, (α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) → TypeVec n
| _, _, p, Fin2.fz => Subtype fun x => p Fin2.fz x
| _, _, p, Fin2.fs i => Subtype_ (dropFun p) i
#align typevec.subtype_ TypeVec.Subtype_
/-- projection on `Subtype_` -/
def subtypeVal : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop), Subtype_ p ⟹ α
| succ n, _, _, Fin2.fs i => @subtypeVal n _ _ i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Subtype.val
#align typevec.subtype_val TypeVec.subtypeVal
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a subtype of vector into
a vector of subtypes -/
def toSubtype :
∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop),
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| succ _, _, p, Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype (dropFun p) i x
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz, x => x
#align typevec.to_subtype TypeVec.toSubtype
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a vector of subtypes
into a subtype of vector -/
def ofSubtype {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => x
#align typevec.of_subtype TypeVec.ofSubtype
/-- similar to `toSubtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def toSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype' (dropFun p) i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
#align typevec.to_subtype' TypeVec.toSubtype'
/-- similar to `of_subtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def ofSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype' _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
#align typevec.of_subtype' TypeVec.ofSubtype'
/-- similar to `diag` but the target vector is a `Subtype_`
guaranteeing the equality of the components -/
def diagSub {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : α ⟹ Subtype_ (repeatEq α)
| Fin2.fs _, x => @diagSub _ (drop α) _ x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
#align typevec.diag_sub TypeVec.diagSub
theorem subtypeVal_nil {α : TypeVec.{u} 0} (ps : α ⟹ «repeat» 0 Prop) :
TypeVec.subtypeVal ps = nilFun :=
funext <| by rintro ⟨⟩
#align typevec.subtype_val_nil TypeVec.subtypeVal_nil
theorem diag_sub_val {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction' i with _ _ _ i_ih
· simp only [comp, subtypeVal, repeatEq.eq_2, diagSub, prod.diag]
apply @i_ih (drop α)
#align typevec.diag_sub_val TypeVec.diag_sub_val
theorem prod_id : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, (id ⊗' id) = (id : α ⊗ β ⟹ _) := by
intros
ext i a
induction' i with _ _ _ i_ih
· cases a
rfl
· apply i_ih
#align typevec.prod_id TypeVec.prod_id
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 661 | 668 | theorem append_prod_appendFun {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n} {φ φ' ψ ψ' : Type u}
{f₀ : α ⟹ α'} {g₀ : β ⟹ β'} {f₁ : φ → φ'} {g₁ : ψ → ψ'} :
((f₀ ⊗' g₀) ::: (_root_.Prod.map f₁ g₁)) = ((f₀ ::: f₁) ⊗' (g₀ ::: g₁)) := by |
ext i a
cases i
· cases a
rfl
· rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Properties
#align_import algebraic_geometry.function_field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
/-!
# Function field of integral schemes
We define the function field of an irreducible scheme as the stalk of the generic point.
This is a field when the scheme is integral.
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.functionField`: The function field of an integral scheme.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.germToFunctionField`: The canonical map from a component into the
function field. This map is injective.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v
open TopologicalSpace Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits TopCat
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable (X : Scheme)
/-- The function field of an irreducible scheme is the local ring at its generic point.
Despite the name, this is a field only when the scheme is integral. -/
noncomputable abbrev Scheme.functionField [IrreducibleSpace X.carrier] : CommRingCat :=
X.presheaf.stalk (genericPoint X.carrier)
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.function_field AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.functionField
/-- The restriction map from a component to the function field. -/
noncomputable abbrev Scheme.germToFunctionField [IrreducibleSpace X.carrier] (U : Opens X.carrier)
[h : Nonempty U] : X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ X.functionField :=
X.presheaf.germ
⟨genericPoint X.carrier,
((genericPoint_spec X.carrier).mem_open_set_iff U.isOpen).mpr (by simpa using h)⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.germ_to_function_field AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.germToFunctionField
noncomputable instance [IrreducibleSpace X.carrier] (U : Opens X.carrier) [Nonempty U] :
Algebra (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) X.functionField :=
(X.germToFunctionField U).toAlgebra
noncomputable instance [IsIntegral X] : Field X.functionField := by
refine .ofIsUnitOrEqZero fun a ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨U, m, s, rfl⟩ := TopCat.Presheaf.germ_exist _ _ a
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right, ← (X.presheaf.germ ⟨_, m⟩).map_zero]
intro ha
replace ha := ne_of_apply_ne _ ha
have hs : genericPoint X.carrier ∈ RingedSpace.basicOpen _ s := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, (genericPoint_spec X.carrier).mem_open_set_iff, Set.top_eq_univ,
Set.univ_inter, Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← Opens.coe_bot, ← SetLike.ext'_iff]
· erw [basicOpen_eq_bot_iff]
exact ha
· exact (RingedSpace.basicOpen _ _).isOpen
have := (X.presheaf.germ ⟨_, hs⟩).isUnit_map (RingedSpace.isUnit_res_basicOpen _ s)
rwa [TopCat.Presheaf.germ_res_apply] at this
theorem germ_injective_of_isIntegral [IsIntegral X] {U : Opens X.carrier} (x : U) :
Function.Injective (X.presheaf.germ x) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro y hy
rw [← (X.presheaf.germ x).map_zero] at hy
obtain ⟨W, hW, iU, iV, e⟩ := X.presheaf.germ_eq _ x.prop x.prop _ _ hy
cases Subsingleton.elim iU iV
haveI : Nonempty W := ⟨⟨_, hW⟩⟩
exact map_injective_of_isIntegral X iU e
#align algebraic_geometry.germ_injective_of_is_integral AlgebraicGeometry.germ_injective_of_isIntegral
theorem Scheme.germToFunctionField_injective [IsIntegral X] (U : Opens X.carrier) [Nonempty U] :
Function.Injective (X.germToFunctionField U) :=
germ_injective_of_isIntegral _ _
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.germ_to_function_field_injective AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.germToFunctionField_injective
theorem genericPoint_eq_of_isOpenImmersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
[hX : IrreducibleSpace X.carrier] [IrreducibleSpace Y.carrier] :
f.1.base (genericPoint X.carrier : _) = (genericPoint Y.carrier : _) := by
apply ((genericPoint_spec Y).eq _).symm
convert (genericPoint_spec X.carrier).image (show Continuous f.1.base by continuity)
symm
rw [eq_top_iff, Set.top_eq_univ, Set.top_eq_univ]
convert subset_closure_inter_of_isPreirreducible_of_isOpen _ H.base_open.isOpen_range _
· rw [Set.univ_inter, Set.image_univ]
· apply PreirreducibleSpace.isPreirreducible_univ (X := Y.carrier)
· exact ⟨_, trivial, Set.mem_range_self hX.2.some⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.generic_point_eq_of_is_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.genericPoint_eq_of_isOpenImmersion
noncomputable instance stalkFunctionFieldAlgebra [IrreducibleSpace X.carrier] (x : X.carrier) :
Algebra (X.presheaf.stalk x) X.functionField := by
apply RingHom.toAlgebra
exact X.presheaf.stalkSpecializes ((genericPoint_spec X.carrier).specializes trivial)
#align algebraic_geometry.stalk_function_field_algebra AlgebraicGeometry.stalkFunctionFieldAlgebra
instance functionField_isScalarTower [IrreducibleSpace X.carrier] (U : Opens X.carrier) (x : U)
[Nonempty U] : IsScalarTower (X.presheaf.obj <| op U) (X.presheaf.stalk x) X.functionField := by
apply IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq'
simp_rw [RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra]
change _ = X.presheaf.germ x ≫ _
rw [X.presheaf.germ_stalkSpecializes]
#align algebraic_geometry.function_field_is_scalar_tower AlgebraicGeometry.functionField_isScalarTower
noncomputable instance (R : CommRingCat.{u}) [IsDomain R] :
Algebra R (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R).functionField :=
RingHom.toAlgebra <| by change CommRingCat.of R ⟶ _; apply StructureSheaf.toStalk
@[simp]
theorem genericPoint_eq_bot_of_affine (R : CommRingCat) [IsDomain R] :
genericPoint (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R).carrier = (⟨0, Ideal.bot_prime⟩ : PrimeSpectrum R) := by
apply (genericPoint_spec (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R).carrier).eq
rw [isGenericPoint_def]
rw [← PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure, PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_singleton]
rw [Set.top_eq_univ, ← PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_zero]
simp_rw [Submodule.zero_eq_bot, Submodule.bot_coe]
#align algebraic_geometry.generic_point_eq_bot_of_affine AlgebraicGeometry.genericPoint_eq_bot_of_affine
instance functionField_isFractionRing_of_affine (R : CommRingCat.{u}) [IsDomain R] :
IsFractionRing R (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op R).functionField := by
convert StructureSheaf.IsLocalization.to_stalk R (genericPoint (Scheme.Spec.obj (op R)))
delta IsFractionRing IsLocalization.AtPrime
-- Porting note: `congr` does not work for `Iff`
apply Eq.to_iff
congr 1
rw [genericPoint_eq_bot_of_affine]
ext
exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero
#align algebraic_geometry.function_field_is_fraction_ring_of_affine AlgebraicGeometry.functionField_isFractionRing_of_affine
instance {X : Scheme} [IsIntegral X] {U : Opens X.carrier} [hU : Nonempty U] :
IsIntegral (X.restrict U.openEmbedding) :=
haveI : Nonempty (X.restrict U.openEmbedding).carrier := hU
isIntegralOfOpenImmersion (X.ofRestrict U.openEmbedding)
theorem IsAffineOpen.primeIdealOf_genericPoint {X : Scheme} [IsIntegral X] {U : Opens X.carrier}
(hU : IsAffineOpen U) [h : Nonempty U] :
hU.primeIdealOf
⟨genericPoint X.carrier,
((genericPoint_spec X.carrier).mem_open_set_iff U.isOpen).mpr (by simpa using h)⟩ =
genericPoint (Scheme.Spec.obj <| op <| X.presheaf.obj <| op U).carrier := by
haveI : IsAffine _ := hU
delta IsAffineOpen.primeIdealOf
convert
genericPoint_eq_of_isOpenImmersion
((X.restrict U.openEmbedding).isoSpec.hom ≫
Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.openEmbedding_obj_top).op).op)
-- Porting note: this was `ext1`
apply Subtype.ext
exact (genericPoint_eq_of_isOpenImmersion (X.ofRestrict U.openEmbedding)).symm
#align algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open.prime_ideal_of_generic_point AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.primeIdealOf_genericPoint
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/FunctionField.lean | 158 | 169 | theorem functionField_isFractionRing_of_isAffineOpen [IsIntegral X] (U : Opens X.carrier)
(hU : IsAffineOpen U) [hU' : Nonempty U] :
IsFractionRing (X.presheaf.obj <| op U) X.functionField := by |
haveI : IsAffine _ := hU
haveI : Nonempty (X.restrict U.openEmbedding).carrier := hU'
haveI : IsIntegral (X.restrict U.openEmbedding) :=
@isIntegralOfIsAffineIsDomain _ _ _
(by dsimp; rw [Opens.openEmbedding_obj_top]; infer_instance)
delta IsFractionRing Scheme.functionField
convert hU.isLocalization_stalk ⟨genericPoint X.carrier, _⟩ using 1
rw [hU.primeIdealOf_genericPoint, genericPoint_eq_bot_of_affine]
ext; exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
#align_import category_theory.subobject.limits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"956af7c76589f444f2e1313911bad16366ea476d"
/-!
# Specific subobjects
We define `equalizerSubobject`, `kernelSubobject` and `imageSubobject`, which are the subobjects
represented by the equalizer, kernel and image of (a pair of) morphism(s) and provide conditions
for `P.factors f`, where `P` is one of these special subobjects.
TODO: Add conditions for when `P` is a pullback subobject.
TODO: an iff characterisation of `(imageSubobject f).Factors h`
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject Opposite
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
section Equalizer
variable (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasEqualizer f g]
/-- The equalizer of morphisms `f g : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev equalizerSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (equalizer.ι f g)
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject
/-- The underlying object of `equalizerSubobject f g` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `equalizer f g`. -/
def equalizerSubobjectIso : (equalizerSubobject f g : C) ≅ equalizer f g :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (equalizer.ι f g)
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobjectIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).hom ≫ equalizer.ι f g = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow' :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).inv ≫ (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow = equalizer.ι f g := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_arrow' CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_arrow'
@[reassoc]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp :
(equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ f = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ g := by
rw [← equalizerSubobject_arrow, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, equalizer.condition]
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_arrow_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h :=
⟨equalizer.lift h w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_factors
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = h ≫ g :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp,
Category.assoc],
equalizerSubobject_factors f g h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_factors_iff CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_factors_iff
end Equalizer
section Kernel
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev kernelSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (kernel.ι f)
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject
/-- The underlying object of `kernelSubobject f` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `kernel f`. -/
def kernelSubobjectIso : (kernelSubobject f : C) ≅ kernel f :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (kernel.ι f)
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobjectIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ kernel.ι f = (kernelSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Limits.lean | 104 | 106 | theorem kernelSubobject_arrow' :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = kernel.ι f := by |
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nakayama
#align_import ring_theory.discrete_valuation_ring.tfae from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Equivalent conditions for DVR
In `DiscreteValuationRing.TFAE`, we show that the following are equivalent for a
noetherian local domain that is not a field `(R, m, k)`:
- `R` is a discrete valuation ring
- `R` is a valuation ring
- `R` is a dedekind domain
- `R` is integrally closed with a unique prime ideal
- `m` is principal
- `dimₖ m/m² = 1`
- Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_localRing_of_isDomain` for a version without `¬ IsField R`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (K : Type*) [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
open scoped DiscreteValuation
open LocalRing FiniteDimensional
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DiscreteValuationRing/TFAE.lean | 37 | 89 | theorem exists_maximalIdeal_pow_eq_of_principal [IsNoetherianRing R] [LocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
(h' : (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal) (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
∃ n : ℕ, I = maximalIdeal R ^ n := by |
by_cases h : IsField R;
· exact ⟨0, by simp [letI := h.toField; (eq_bot_or_eq_top I).resolve_left hI]⟩
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx : _ = Ideal.span _⟩ := h'
by_cases hI' : I = ⊤
· use 0; rw [pow_zero, hI', Ideal.one_eq_top]
have H : ∀ r : R, ¬IsUnit r ↔ x ∣ r := fun r =>
(SetLike.ext_iff.mp hx r).trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
have : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
apply Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField (maximalIdeal.isMaximal R) h
simp [hx]
have hx' := DiscreteValuationRing.irreducible_of_span_eq_maximalIdeal x this hx
have H' : ∀ r : R, r ≠ 0 → r ∈ nonunits R → ∃ n : ℕ, Associated (x ^ n) r := by
intro r hr₁ hr₂
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, rfl, hf₂⟩ := (WfDvdMonoid.not_unit_iff_exists_factors_eq r hr₁).mp hr₂
have : ∀ b ∈ f, Associated x b := by
intro b hb
exact Irreducible.associated_of_dvd hx' (hf₁ b hb) ((H b).mp (hf₁ b hb).1)
clear hr₁ hr₂ hf₁
induction' f using Multiset.induction with fa fs fh
· exact (hf₂ rfl).elim
rcases eq_or_ne fs ∅ with (rfl | hf')
· use 1
rw [pow_one, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.empty_eq_zero, Multiset.prod_zero, mul_one]
exact this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := fh hf' fun b hb => this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hb)
use n + 1
rw [pow_add, Multiset.prod_cons, mul_comm, pow_one]
exact Associated.mul_mul (this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)) hn
have : ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ : ∃ r : R, r ∈ I ∧ r ≠ 0 := by
by_contra! h; apply hI; rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact h
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' r hr₂ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hr₁)
use n
rwa [← I.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem u.isUnit, mul_comm]
use Nat.find this
apply le_antisymm
· change ∀ s ∈ I, s ∈ _
by_contra! hI''
obtain ⟨s, hs₁, hs₂⟩ := hI''
apply hs₂
by_cases hs₃ : s = 0; · rw [hs₃]; exact zero_mem _
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' s hs₃ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hs₁)
rw [mul_comm, Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem _ u.isUnit] at hs₁ ⊢
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.find_min' this hs₁)
apply Ideal.pow_mem_pow
exact (H _).mpr (dvd_refl _)
· rw [hx, Ideal.span_singleton_pow, Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact Nat.find_spec this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 705 | 705 | theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by | simp [tail]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Violeta Hernández Palacios, Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Exponential
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.fixed_point from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0dd4319a17376eda5763cd0a7e0d35bbaaa50e83"
/-!
# Fixed points of normal functions
We prove various statements about the fixed points of normal ordinal functions. We state them in
three forms: as statements about type-indexed families of normal functions, as statements about
ordinal-indexed families of normal functions, and as statements about a single normal function. For
the most part, the first case encompasses the others.
Moreover, we prove some lemmas about the fixed points of specific normal functions.
## Main definitions and results
* `nfpFamily`, `nfpBFamily`, `nfp`: the next fixed point of a (family of) normal function(s).
* `fp_family_unbounded`, `fp_bfamily_unbounded`, `fp_unbounded`: the (common) fixed points of a
(family of) normal function(s) are unbounded in the ordinals.
* `deriv_add_eq_mul_omega_add`: a characterization of the derivative of addition.
* `deriv_mul_eq_opow_omega_mul`: a characterization of the derivative of multiplication.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v
open Function Order
namespace Ordinal
/-! ### Fixed points of type-indexed families of ordinals -/
section
variable {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}}
/-- The next common fixed point, at least `a`, for a family of normal functions.
This is defined for any family of functions, as the supremum of all values reachable by applying
finitely many functions in the family to `a`.
`Ordinal.nfpFamily_fp` shows this is a fixed point, `Ordinal.le_nfpFamily` shows it's at
least `a`, and `Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_fp` shows this is the least ordinal with these properties. -/
def nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (a : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
sup (List.foldr f a)
#align ordinal.nfp_family Ordinal.nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_eq_sup (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}) (a : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
nfpFamily.{u, v} f a = sup.{u, v} (List.foldr f a) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_family_eq_sup Ordinal.nfpFamily_eq_sup
theorem foldr_le_nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal)
(a l) : List.foldr f a l ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ _
#align ordinal.foldr_le_nfp_family Ordinal.foldr_le_nfpFamily
theorem le_nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (a) : a ≤ nfpFamily f a :=
le_sup _ []
#align ordinal.le_nfp_family Ordinal.le_nfpFamily
theorem lt_nfpFamily {a b} : a < nfpFamily.{u, v} f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr f b l :=
lt_sup.{u, v}
#align ordinal.lt_nfp_family Ordinal.lt_nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_le_iff {a b} : nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b :=
sup_le_iff
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_iff Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le {a b} : (∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b) → nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le Ordinal.nfpFamily_le
theorem nfpFamily_monotone (hf : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) : Monotone (nfpFamily.{u, v} f) :=
fun _ _ h => sup_le.{u, v} fun l => (List.foldr_monotone hf l h).trans (le_sup.{u, v} _ l)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_monotone Ordinal.nfpFamily_monotone
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} (hb : b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) (i) :
f i b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_nfpFamily.1 hb
lt_sup.2 ⟨i::l, (H i).strictMono hl⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_family Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpFamily
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff [Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∀ i, f i b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) ↔ b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
⟨fun h =>
lt_nfpFamily.2 <|
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_sup.1 <| h <| Classical.arbitrary ι
⟨l, ((H _).self_le b).trans_lt hl⟩,
apply_lt_nfpFamily H⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_family_iff Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le_apply [Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∃ i, nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ f i b) ↔ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff H
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_apply Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_apply
theorem nfpFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ i, f i b ≤ b) :
nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b :=
sup_le fun l => by
by_cases hι : IsEmpty ι
· rwa [Unique.eq_default l]
· induction' l with i l IH generalizing a
· exact ab
exact (H i (IH ab)).trans (h i)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_fp Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_fp
theorem nfpFamily_fp {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (a) :
f i (nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) = nfpFamily.{u, v} f a := by
unfold nfpFamily
rw [@IsNormal.sup.{u, v, v} _ H _ _ ⟨[]⟩]
apply le_antisymm <;> refine Ordinal.sup_le fun l => ?_
· exact le_sup _ (i::l)
· exact (H.self_le _).trans (le_sup _ _)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_fp Ordinal.nfpFamily_fp
theorem apply_le_nfpFamily [hι : Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i))
{a b} : (∀ i, f i b ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i => ?_⟩
· cases' hι with i
exact ((H i).self_le b).trans (h i)
rw [← nfpFamily_fp (H i)]
exact (H i).monotone h
#align ordinal.apply_le_nfp_family Ordinal.apply_le_nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_eq_self {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {a} (h : ∀ i, f i a = a) :
nfpFamily f a = a :=
le_antisymm (sup_le fun l => by rw [List.foldr_fixed' h l]) <| le_nfpFamily f a
#align ordinal.nfp_family_eq_self Ordinal.nfpFamily_eq_self
-- Todo: This is actually a special case of the fact the intersection of club sets is a club set.
/-- A generalization of the fixed point lemma for normal functions: any family of normal functions
has an unbounded set of common fixed points. -/
theorem fp_family_unbounded (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
(⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)).Unbounded (· < ·) := fun a =>
⟨nfpFamily.{u, v} f a, fun s ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, mem_fixedPoints_iff]
exact nfpFamily_fp.{u, v} (H i) a, (le_nfpFamily f a).not_lt⟩
#align ordinal.fp_family_unbounded Ordinal.fp_family_unbounded
/-- The derivative of a family of normal functions is the sequence of their common fixed points.
This is defined for all functions such that `Ordinal.derivFamily_zero`,
`Ordinal.derivFamily_succ`, and `Ordinal.derivFamily_limit` are satisfied. -/
def derivFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
limitRecOn o (nfpFamily.{u, v} f 0) (fun _ IH => nfpFamily.{u, v} f (succ IH))
fun a _ => bsup.{max u v, u} a
#align ordinal.deriv_family Ordinal.derivFamily
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_zero (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f 0 = nfpFamily.{u, v} f 0 :=
limitRecOn_zero _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_zero Ordinal.derivFamily_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_succ (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f (succ o) = nfpFamily.{u, v} f (succ (derivFamily.{u, v} f o)) :=
limitRecOn_succ _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_succ Ordinal.derivFamily_succ
theorem derivFamily_limit (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) {o} :
IsLimit o → derivFamily.{u, v} f o = bsup.{max u v, u} o fun a _ => derivFamily.{u, v} f a :=
limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_limit Ordinal.derivFamily_limit
theorem derivFamily_isNormal (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) : IsNormal (derivFamily f) :=
⟨fun o => by rw [derivFamily_succ, ← succ_le_iff]; apply le_nfpFamily, fun o l a => by
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, bsup_le_iff]⟩
#align ordinal.deriv_family_is_normal Ordinal.derivFamily_isNormal
theorem derivFamily_fp {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (o : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
f i (derivFamily.{u, v} f o) = derivFamily.{u, v} f o := by
induction' o using limitRecOn with o _ o l IH
· rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_fp H 0
· rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_fp H _
· rw [derivFamily_limit _ l,
IsNormal.bsup.{max u v, u, max u v} H (fun a _ => derivFamily f a) l.1]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [bsup_le_iff, IH]
#align ordinal.deriv_family_fp Ordinal.derivFamily_fp
theorem le_iff_derivFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a :=
⟨fun ha => by
suffices ∀ (o) (_ : a ≤ derivFamily.{u, v} f o), ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a from
this a ((derivFamily_isNormal _).self_le _)
intro o
induction' o using limitRecOn with o IH o l IH
· intro h₁
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (Ordinal.zero_le _) ha
· intro h₁
rcases le_or_lt a (derivFamily.{u, v} f o) with h | h
· exact IH h
refine ⟨succ o, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (succ_le_of_lt h) ha
· intro h₁
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with h h
· exact ⟨_, h.symm⟩
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, ← not_le, bsup_le_iff, not_forall₂] at h
exact
let ⟨o', h, hl⟩ := h
IH o' h (le_of_not_le hl),
fun ⟨o, e⟩ i => e ▸ (derivFamily_fp (H i) _).le⟩
#align ordinal.le_iff_deriv_family Ordinal.le_iff_derivFamily
theorem fp_iff_derivFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a = a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h i => le_of_eq (h i), fun h i => (H i).le_iff_eq.1 (h i)⟩ (le_iff_derivFamily H)
#align ordinal.fp_iff_deriv_family Ordinal.fp_iff_derivFamily
/-- For a family of normal functions, `Ordinal.derivFamily` enumerates the common fixed points. -/
theorem derivFamily_eq_enumOrd (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f = enumOrd (⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)) := by
rw [← eq_enumOrd _ (fp_family_unbounded.{u, v} H)]
use (derivFamily_isNormal f).strictMono
rw [Set.range_eq_iff]
refine ⟨?_, fun a ha => ?_⟩
· rintro a S ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [← hi]
exact derivFamily_fp (H i) a
rw [Set.mem_iInter] at ha
rwa [← fp_iff_derivFamily H]
#align ordinal.deriv_family_eq_enum_ord Ordinal.derivFamily_eq_enumOrd
end
/-! ### Fixed points of ordinal-indexed families of ordinals -/
section
variable {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}}
/-- The next common fixed point, at least `a`, for a family of normal functions indexed by ordinals.
This is defined as `Ordinal.nfpFamily` of the type-indexed family associated to `f`. -/
def nfpBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
nfpFamily (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily Ordinal.nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_eq_nfpFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f = nfpFamily.{u, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_eq_nfp_family Ordinal.nfpBFamily_eq_nfpFamily
theorem foldr_le_nfpBFamily {o : Ordinal}
(f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) (a l) :
List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ _
#align ordinal.foldr_le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.foldr_le_nfpBFamily
theorem le_nfpBFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) (a) :
a ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ []
#align ordinal.le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.le_nfpBFamily
theorem lt_nfpBFamily {a b} :
a < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) b l :=
lt_sup.{u, v}
#align ordinal.lt_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.lt_nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal} {a b} :
nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ b :=
sup_le_iff.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_iff Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_iff
theorem nfpBFamily_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal} {a b} :
(∀ l, List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ b) → nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le
theorem nfpBFamily_monotone (hf : ∀ i hi, Monotone (f i hi)) : Monotone (nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f) :=
nfpFamily_monotone fun _ => hf _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_monotone Ordinal.nfpBFamily_monotone
theorem apply_lt_nfpBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} (hb : b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a)
(i hi) : f i hi b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply apply_lt_nfpFamily (fun _ => H _ _) hb
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpBFamily
theorem apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) ↔ b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
⟨fun h => by
haveI := out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
refine (apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff.{u, v} ?_).1 fun _ => h _ _
exact fun _ => H _ _, apply_lt_nfpBFamily H⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_bfamily_iff Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff
theorem nfpBFamily_le_apply (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∃ i hi, nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ f i hi b) ↔ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff.{u, v} ho H
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_apply Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_apply
theorem nfpBFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i hi, Monotone (f i hi)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b)
(h : ∀ i hi, f i hi b ≤ b) : nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b :=
nfpFamily_le_fp (fun _ => H _ _) ab fun _ => h _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_fp Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_fp
theorem nfpBFamily_fp {i hi} (H : IsNormal (f i hi)) (a) :
f i hi (nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) = nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply nfpFamily_fp
rw [familyOfBFamily_enum]
exact H
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_fp Ordinal.nfpBFamily_fp
theorem apply_le_nfpBFamily (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi b ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
· have ho' : 0 < o := Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
exact ((H 0 ho').self_le b).trans (h 0 ho')
· rw [← nfpBFamily_fp (H i hi)]
exact (H i hi).monotone h
#align ordinal.apply_le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.apply_le_nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_eq_self {a} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi a = a) : nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a = a :=
nfpFamily_eq_self fun _ => h _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_eq_self Ordinal.nfpBFamily_eq_self
/-- A generalization of the fixed point lemma for normal functions: any family of normal functions
has an unbounded set of common fixed points. -/
theorem fp_bfamily_unbounded (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) :
(⋂ (i) (hi), Function.fixedPoints (f i hi)).Unbounded (· < ·) := fun a =>
⟨nfpBFamily.{u, v} _ f a, by
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂]
exact fun i hi => nfpBFamily_fp (H i hi) _, (le_nfpBFamily f a).not_lt⟩
#align ordinal.fp_bfamily_unbounded Ordinal.fp_bfamily_unbounded
/-- The derivative of a family of normal functions is the sequence of their common fixed points.
This is defined as `Ordinal.derivFamily` of the type-indexed family associated to `f`. -/
def derivBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
derivFamily (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily Ordinal.derivBFamily
theorem derivBFamily_eq_derivFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivBFamily.{u, v} o f = derivFamily.{u, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_eq_deriv_family Ordinal.derivBFamily_eq_derivFamily
theorem derivBFamily_isNormal {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal (derivBFamily o f) :=
derivFamily_isNormal _
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_is_normal Ordinal.derivBFamily_isNormal
theorem derivBFamily_fp {i hi} (H : IsNormal (f i hi)) (a : Ordinal) :
f i hi (derivBFamily.{u, v} o f a) = derivBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply derivFamily_fp
rw [familyOfBFamily_enum]
exact H
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_fp Ordinal.derivBFamily_fp
theorem le_iff_derivBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ b, derivBFamily.{u, v} o f b = a := by
unfold derivBFamily
rw [← le_iff_derivFamily]
· refine ⟨fun h i => h _ _, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply h
· exact fun _ => H _ _
#align ordinal.le_iff_deriv_bfamily Ordinal.le_iff_derivBFamily
theorem fp_iff_derivBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi a = a) ↔ ∃ b, derivBFamily.{u, v} o f b = a := by
rw [← le_iff_derivBFamily H]
refine ⟨fun h i hi => le_of_eq (h i hi), fun h i hi => ?_⟩
rw [← (H i hi).le_iff_eq]
exact h i hi
#align ordinal.fp_iff_deriv_bfamily Ordinal.fp_iff_derivBFamily
/-- For a family of normal functions, `Ordinal.derivBFamily` enumerates the common fixed points. -/
theorem derivBFamily_eq_enumOrd (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) :
derivBFamily.{u, v} o f = enumOrd (⋂ (i) (hi), Function.fixedPoints (f i hi)) := by
rw [← eq_enumOrd _ (fp_bfamily_unbounded.{u, v} H)]
use (derivBFamily_isNormal f).strictMono
rw [Set.range_eq_iff]
refine ⟨fun a => Set.mem_iInter₂.2 fun i hi => derivBFamily_fp (H i hi) a, fun a ha => ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂] at ha
rwa [← fp_iff_derivBFamily H]
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_eq_enum_ord Ordinal.derivBFamily_eq_enumOrd
end
/-! ### Fixed points of a single function -/
section
variable {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}}
/-- The next fixed point function, the least fixed point of the normal function `f`, at least `a`.
This is defined as `ordinal.nfpFamily` applied to a family consisting only of `f`. -/
def nfp (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
nfpFamily fun _ : Unit => f
#align ordinal.nfp Ordinal.nfp
theorem nfp_eq_nfpFamily (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : nfp f = nfpFamily fun _ : Unit => f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_eq_nfp_family Ordinal.nfp_eq_nfpFamily
@[simp]
theorem sup_iterate_eq_nfp (f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) :
(fun a => sup fun n : ℕ => f^[n] a) = nfp f := by
refine funext fun a => le_antisymm ?_ (sup_le fun l => ?_)
· rw [sup_le_iff]
intro n
rw [← List.length_replicate n Unit.unit, ← List.foldr_const f a]
apply le_sup
· rw [List.foldr_const f a l]
exact le_sup _ _
#align ordinal.sup_iterate_eq_nfp Ordinal.sup_iterate_eq_nfp
theorem iterate_le_nfp (f a n) : f^[n] a ≤ nfp f a := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact le_sup _ n
#align ordinal.iterate_le_nfp Ordinal.iterate_le_nfp
theorem le_nfp (f a) : a ≤ nfp f a :=
iterate_le_nfp f a 0
#align ordinal.le_nfp Ordinal.le_nfp
theorem lt_nfp {a b} : a < nfp f b ↔ ∃ n, a < f^[n] b := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact lt_sup
#align ordinal.lt_nfp Ordinal.lt_nfp
theorem nfp_le_iff {a b} : nfp f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ n, f^[n] a ≤ b := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact sup_le_iff
#align ordinal.nfp_le_iff Ordinal.nfp_le_iff
theorem nfp_le {a b} : (∀ n, f^[n] a ≤ b) → nfp f a ≤ b :=
nfp_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.nfp_le Ordinal.nfp_le
@[simp]
theorem nfp_id : nfp id = id :=
funext fun a => by
simp_rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp, iterate_id]
exact sup_const a
#align ordinal.nfp_id Ordinal.nfp_id
theorem nfp_monotone (hf : Monotone f) : Monotone (nfp f) :=
nfpFamily_monotone fun _ => hf
#align ordinal.nfp_monotone Ordinal.nfp_monotone
theorem IsNormal.apply_lt_nfp {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f b < nfp f a ↔ b < nfp f a := by
unfold nfp
rw [← @apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff Unit (fun _ => f) _ (fun _ => H) a b]
exact ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => h Unit.unit⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.apply_lt_nfp Ordinal.IsNormal.apply_lt_nfp
theorem IsNormal.nfp_le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : nfp f a ≤ f b ↔ nfp f a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.apply_lt_nfp
#align ordinal.is_normal.nfp_le_apply Ordinal.IsNormal.nfp_le_apply
theorem nfp_le_fp {f} (H : Monotone f) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : f b ≤ b) : nfp f a ≤ b :=
nfpFamily_le_fp (fun _ => H) ab fun _ => h
#align ordinal.nfp_le_fp Ordinal.nfp_le_fp
theorem IsNormal.nfp_fp {f} (H : IsNormal f) : ∀ a, f (nfp f a) = nfp f a :=
@nfpFamily_fp Unit (fun _ => f) Unit.unit H
#align ordinal.is_normal.nfp_fp Ordinal.IsNormal.nfp_fp
theorem IsNormal.apply_le_nfp {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f b ≤ nfp f a ↔ b ≤ nfp f a :=
⟨le_trans (H.self_le _), fun h => by simpa only [H.nfp_fp] using H.le_iff.2 h⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.apply_le_nfp Ordinal.IsNormal.apply_le_nfp
theorem nfp_eq_self {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} {a} (h : f a = a) : nfp f a = a :=
nfpFamily_eq_self fun _ => h
#align ordinal.nfp_eq_self Ordinal.nfp_eq_self
/-- The fixed point lemma for normal functions: any normal function has an unbounded set of
fixed points. -/
theorem fp_unbounded (H : IsNormal f) : (Function.fixedPoints f).Unbounded (· < ·) := by
convert fp_family_unbounded fun _ : Unit => H
exact (Set.iInter_const _).symm
#align ordinal.fp_unbounded Ordinal.fp_unbounded
/-- The derivative of a normal function `f` is the sequence of fixed points of `f`.
This is defined as `Ordinal.derivFamily` applied to a trivial family consisting only of `f`. -/
def deriv (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
derivFamily fun _ : Unit => f
#align ordinal.deriv Ordinal.deriv
theorem deriv_eq_derivFamily (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : deriv f = derivFamily fun _ : Unit => f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.deriv_eq_deriv_family Ordinal.deriv_eq_derivFamily
@[simp]
theorem deriv_zero (f) : deriv f 0 = nfp f 0 :=
derivFamily_zero _
#align ordinal.deriv_zero Ordinal.deriv_zero
@[simp]
theorem deriv_succ (f o) : deriv f (succ o) = nfp f (succ (deriv f o)) :=
derivFamily_succ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_succ Ordinal.deriv_succ
theorem deriv_limit (f) {o} : IsLimit o → deriv f o = bsup.{u, 0} o fun a _ => deriv f a :=
derivFamily_limit _
#align ordinal.deriv_limit Ordinal.deriv_limit
theorem deriv_isNormal (f) : IsNormal (deriv f) :=
derivFamily_isNormal _
#align ordinal.deriv_is_normal Ordinal.deriv_isNormal
theorem deriv_id_of_nfp_id {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} (h : nfp f = id) : deriv f = id :=
((deriv_isNormal _).eq_iff_zero_and_succ IsNormal.refl).2 (by simp [h])
#align ordinal.deriv_id_of_nfp_id Ordinal.deriv_id_of_nfp_id
theorem IsNormal.deriv_fp {f} (H : IsNormal f) : ∀ o, f (deriv f o) = deriv f o :=
@derivFamily_fp Unit (fun _ => f) Unit.unit H
#align ordinal.is_normal.deriv_fp Ordinal.IsNormal.deriv_fp
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_deriv {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ ∃ o, deriv f o = a := by
unfold deriv
rw [← le_iff_derivFamily fun _ : Unit => H]
exact ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => h Unit.unit⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_deriv Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_deriv
theorem IsNormal.fp_iff_deriv {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a = a ↔ ∃ o, deriv f o = a := by
rw [← H.le_iff_eq, H.le_iff_deriv]
#align ordinal.is_normal.fp_iff_deriv Ordinal.IsNormal.fp_iff_deriv
/-- `Ordinal.deriv` enumerates the fixed points of a normal function. -/
theorem deriv_eq_enumOrd (H : IsNormal f) : deriv f = enumOrd (Function.fixedPoints f) := by
convert derivFamily_eq_enumOrd fun _ : Unit => H
exact (Set.iInter_const _).symm
#align ordinal.deriv_eq_enum_ord Ordinal.deriv_eq_enumOrd
theorem deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} (h : nfp f = id) : deriv f = id :=
(IsNormal.eq_iff_zero_and_succ (deriv_isNormal _) IsNormal.refl).2 <| by simp [h]
#align ordinal.deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id Ordinal.deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id
end
/-! ### Fixed points of addition -/
@[simp]
theorem nfp_add_zero (a) : nfp (a + ·) 0 = a * omega := by
simp_rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp, ← sup_mul_nat]
congr; funext n
induction' n with n hn
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, iterate_zero_apply]
· rw [iterate_succ_apply', Nat.add_comm, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one_add, hn]
#align ordinal.nfp_add_zero Ordinal.nfp_add_zero
theorem nfp_add_eq_mul_omega {a b} (hba : b ≤ a * omega) : nfp (a + ·) b = a * omega := by
apply le_antisymm (nfp_le_fp (add_isNormal a).monotone hba _)
· rw [← nfp_add_zero]
exact nfp_monotone (add_isNormal a).monotone (Ordinal.zero_le b)
· dsimp; rw [← mul_one_add, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.nfp_add_eq_mul_omega Ordinal.nfp_add_eq_mul_omega
theorem add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = b ↔ a * omega ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← nfp_add_zero a, ← deriv_zero]
cases' (add_isNormal a).fp_iff_deriv.1 h with c hc
rw [← hc]
exact (deriv_isNormal _).monotone (Ordinal.zero_le _)
· have := Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h
nth_rw 1 [← this]
rwa [← add_assoc, ← mul_one_add, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le Ordinal.add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le
theorem add_le_right_iff_mul_omega_le {a b : Ordinal} : a + b ≤ b ↔ a * omega ≤ b := by
rw [← add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le]
exact (add_isNormal a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.add_le_right_iff_mul_omega_le Ordinal.add_le_right_iff_mul_omega_le
theorem deriv_add_eq_mul_omega_add (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : deriv (a + ·) b = a * omega + b := by
revert b
rw [← funext_iff, IsNormal.eq_iff_zero_and_succ (deriv_isNormal _) (add_isNormal _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun a h => ?_⟩
· rw [deriv_zero, add_zero]
exact nfp_add_zero a
· rw [deriv_succ, h, add_succ]
exact nfp_eq_self (add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le.2 ((le_add_right _ _).trans (le_succ _)))
#align ordinal.deriv_add_eq_mul_omega_add Ordinal.deriv_add_eq_mul_omega_add
/-! ### Fixed points of multiplication -/
-- Porting note: commented out, doesn't seem necessary
-- local infixr:0 "^" => @Pow.pow Ordinal Ordinal Ordinal.hasPow
@[simp]
theorem nfp_mul_one {a : Ordinal} (ha : 0 < a) : nfp (a * ·) 1 = (a^omega) := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp, ← sup_opow_nat]
· dsimp
congr
funext n
induction' n with n hn
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, opow_zero, iterate_zero_apply]
rw [iterate_succ_apply', Nat.add_comm, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, opow_add, opow_one, hn]
· exact ha
#align ordinal.nfp_mul_one Ordinal.nfp_mul_one
@[simp]
theorem nfp_mul_zero (a : Ordinal) : nfp (a * ·) 0 = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, nfp_le_iff]
intro n
induction' n with n hn; · rfl
dsimp only; rwa [iterate_succ_apply, mul_zero]
#align ordinal.nfp_mul_zero Ordinal.nfp_mul_zero
@[simp]
theorem nfp_zero_mul : nfp (HMul.hMul 0) = id := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp]
refine funext fun a => (sup_le fun n => ?_).antisymm (le_sup (fun n => (0 * ·)^[n] a) 0)
induction' n with n _
· rfl
rw [Function.iterate_succ']
change 0 * _ ≤ a
rw [zero_mul]
exact Ordinal.zero_le a
#align ordinal.nfp_zero_mul Ordinal.nfp_zero_mul
@[simp]
theorem deriv_mul_zero : deriv (HMul.hMul 0) = id :=
deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id nfp_zero_mul
#align ordinal.deriv_mul_zero Ordinal.deriv_mul_zero
theorem nfp_mul_eq_opow_omega {a b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (hba : b ≤ (a^omega)) :
nfp (a * ·) b = (a^omega.{u}) := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with ha | ha
· rw [ha, zero_opow omega_ne_zero] at hba ⊢
rw [Ordinal.le_zero.1 hba, nfp_zero_mul]
rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply nfp_le_fp (mul_isNormal ha).monotone hba
rw [← opow_one_add, one_add_omega]
rw [← nfp_mul_one ha]
exact nfp_monotone (mul_isNormal ha).monotone (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb)
#align ordinal.nfp_mul_eq_opow_omega Ordinal.nfp_mul_eq_opow_omega
theorem eq_zero_or_opow_omega_le_of_mul_eq_right {a b : Ordinal} (hab : a * b = b) :
b = 0 ∨ (a^omega.{u}) ≤ b := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with ha | ha
· rw [ha, zero_opow omega_ne_zero]
exact Or.inr (Ordinal.zero_le b)
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hb
rw [← nfp_mul_one ha]
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hb
exact nfp_le_fp (mul_isNormal ha).monotone hb (le_of_eq hab)
#align ordinal.eq_zero_or_opow_omega_le_of_mul_eq_right Ordinal.eq_zero_or_opow_omega_le_of_mul_eq_right
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPoint.lean | 673 | 686 | theorem mul_eq_right_iff_opow_omega_dvd {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = b ↔ (a^omega) ∣ b := by |
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with ha | ha
· rw [ha, zero_mul, zero_opow omega_ne_zero, zero_dvd_iff]
exact eq_comm
refine ⟨fun hab => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
rw [← div_add_mod b (a^omega), mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← opow_one_add, one_add_omega,
add_left_cancel] at hab
cases' eq_zero_or_opow_omega_le_of_mul_eq_right hab with hab hab
· exact hab
refine (not_lt_of_le hab (mod_lt b (opow_ne_zero omega ?_))).elim
rwa [← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
cases' h with c hc
rw [hc, ← mul_assoc, ← opow_one_add, one_add_omega]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.PUnit
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Stalks
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Functors
#align_import topology.sheaves.skyscraper from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Skyscraper (pre)sheaves
A skyscraper (pre)sheaf `𝓕 : (Pre)Sheaf C X` is the (pre)sheaf with value `A` at point `p₀` that is
supported only at open sets contain `p₀`, i.e. `𝓕(U) = A` if `p₀ ∈ U` and `𝓕(U) = *` if `p₀ ∉ U`
where `*` is a terminal object of `C`. In terms of stalks, `𝓕` is supported at all specializations
of `p₀`, i.e. if `p₀ ⤳ x` then `𝓕ₓ ≅ A` and if `¬ p₀ ⤳ x` then `𝓕ₓ ≅ *`.
## Main definitions
* `skyscraperPresheaf`: `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` is the skyscraper presheaf at point `p₀` with
value `A`.
* `skyscraperSheaf`: the skyscraper presheaf satisfies the sheaf condition.
## Main statements
* `skyscraperPresheafStalkOfSpecializes`: if `y ∈ closure {p₀}` then the stalk of
`skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `A`.
* `skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializes`: if `y ∉ closure {p₀}` then the stalk of
`skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `*` the terminal object.
TODO: generalize universe level when calculating stalks, after generalizing universe level of stalk.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace TopCat CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
universe u v w
variable {X : TopCat.{u}} (p₀ : X) [∀ U : Opens X, Decidable (p₀ ∈ U)]
section
variable {C : Type v} [Category.{w} C] [HasTerminal C] (A : C)
/-- A skyscraper presheaf is a presheaf supported at a single point: if `p₀ ∈ X` is a specified
point, then the skyscraper presheaf `𝓕` with value `A` is defined by `U ↦ A` if `p₀ ∈ U` and
`U ↦ *` if `p₀ ∉ A` where `*` is some terminal object.
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheaf : Presheaf C X where
obj U := if p₀ ∈ unop U then A else terminal C
map {U V} i :=
if h : p₀ ∈ unop V then eqToHom <| by dsimp; erw [if_pos h, if_pos (leOfHom i.unop h)]
else ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).from _
map_id U :=
(em (p₀ ∈ U.unop)).elim (fun h => dif_pos h) fun h =>
((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext _ _
map_comp {U V W} iVU iWV := by
by_cases hW : p₀ ∈ unop W
· have hV : p₀ ∈ unop V := leOfHom iWV.unop hW
simp only [dif_pos hW, dif_pos hV, eqToHom_trans]
· dsimp; rw [dif_neg hW]; apply ((if_neg hW).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext
#align skyscraper_presheaf skyscraperPresheaf
theorem skyscraperPresheaf_eq_pushforward
[hd : ∀ U : Opens (TopCat.of PUnit.{u + 1}), Decidable (PUnit.unit ∈ U)] :
skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A =
ContinuousMap.const (TopCat.of PUnit) p₀ _*
skyscraperPresheaf (X := TopCat.of PUnit) PUnit.unit A := by
convert_to @skyscraperPresheaf X p₀ (fun U => hd <| (Opens.map <| ContinuousMap.const _ p₀).obj U)
C _ _ A = _ <;> congr
#align skyscraper_presheaf_eq_pushforward skyscraperPresheaf_eq_pushforward
/-- Taking skyscraper presheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps]
def SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' {a b : C} (f : a ⟶ b) :
skyscraperPresheaf p₀ a ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ b where
app U :=
if h : p₀ ∈ U.unop then eqToHom (if_pos h) ≫ f ≫ eqToHom (if_pos h).symm
else ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).from _
naturality U V i := by
simp only [skyscraperPresheaf_map]; by_cases hV : p₀ ∈ V.unop
· have hU : p₀ ∈ U.unop := leOfHom i.unop hV; split_ifs <;>
simp only [eqToHom_trans_assoc, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans]
· apply ((if_neg hV).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext
#align skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map' SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'
theorem SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_id {a : C} :
SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ (𝟙 a) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext U
simp only [SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_app, NatTrans.id_app]; split_ifs <;> aesop_cat
#align skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_id SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_id
theorem SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_comp {a b c : C} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ (f ≫ g) =
SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ f ≫ SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ g := by
ext U
-- Porting note: change `simp` to `rw`
rw [NatTrans.comp_app]
simp only [SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_app]
split_ifs with h <;> aesop_cat
#align skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_comp SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_comp
/-- Taking skyscraper presheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheafFunctor : C ⥤ Presheaf C X where
obj := skyscraperPresheaf p₀
map := SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀
map_id _ := SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_id p₀
map_comp := SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_comp p₀
#align skyscraper_presheaf_functor skyscraperPresheafFunctor
end
section
-- In this section, we calculate the stalks for skyscraper presheaves.
-- We need to restrict universe level.
variable {C : Type v} [Category.{u} C] (A : C) [HasTerminal C]
/-- The cocone at `A` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∈ closure {p₀}`
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) :
Cocone ((OpenNhds.inclusion y).op ⋙ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A) where
pt := A
ι :=
{ app := fun U => eqToHom <| if_pos <| h.mem_open U.unop.1.2 U.unop.2
naturality := fun U V inc => by
change dite _ _ _ ≫ _ = _; rw [dif_pos]
swap -- Porting note: swap goal to prevent proving same thing twice
· exact h.mem_open V.unop.1.2 V.unop.2
· simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Functor.op_obj, skyscraperPresheaf_obj, unop_op,
Functor.const_obj_obj, eqToHom_trans, Functor.const_obj_map, Category.comp_id] }
#align skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_of_specializes skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes
/--
The cocone at `A` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∈ closure {p₀}` is a
colimit
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfSpecializes {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) :
IsColimit (skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes p₀ A h) where
desc c := eqToHom (if_pos trivial).symm ≫ c.ι.app (op ⊤)
fac c U := by
dsimp -- Porting note (#11227):added a `dsimp`
rw [← c.w (homOfLE <| (le_top : unop U ≤ _)).op]
change _ ≫ _ ≫ dite _ _ _ ≫ _ = _
rw [dif_pos]
· simp only [skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes_ι_app, eqToHom_trans_assoc,
eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp, unop_op, op_unop]
· exact h.mem_open U.unop.1.2 U.unop.2
uniq c f h := by
dsimp -- Porting note (#11227):added a `dsimp`
rw [← h, skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes_ι_app, eqToHom_trans_assoc, eqToHom_refl,
Category.id_comp]
#align skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_is_colimit_of_specializes skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfSpecializes
/-- If `y ∈ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `A`.
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafStalkOfSpecializes [HasColimits C] {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) :
(skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).stalk y ≅ A :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨_, skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfSpecializes p₀ A h⟩
#align skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_specializes skyscraperPresheafStalkOfSpecializes
/-- The cocone at `*` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∉ closure {p₀}`
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheafCocone (y : X) :
Cocone ((OpenNhds.inclusion y).op ⋙ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A) where
pt := terminal C
ι :=
{ app := fun _ => terminal.from _
naturality := fun _ _ _ => terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext _ _ }
#align skyscraper_presheaf_cocone skyscraperPresheafCocone
/--
The cocone at `*` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∉ closure {p₀}` is a
colimit
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfNotSpecializes {y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) :
IsColimit (skyscraperPresheafCocone p₀ A y) :=
let h1 : ∃ U : OpenNhds y, p₀ ∉ U.1 :=
let ⟨U, ho, h₀, hy⟩ := not_specializes_iff_exists_open.mp h
⟨⟨⟨U, ho⟩, h₀⟩, hy⟩
{ desc := fun c => eqToHom (if_neg h1.choose_spec).symm ≫ c.ι.app (op h1.choose)
fac := fun c U => by
change _ = c.ι.app (op U.unop)
simp only [← c.w (homOfLE <| @inf_le_left _ _ h1.choose U.unop).op, ←
c.w (homOfLE <| @inf_le_right _ _ h1.choose U.unop).op, ← Category.assoc]
congr 1
refine ((if_neg ?_).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext _ _
exact fun h => h1.choose_spec h.1
uniq := fun c f H => by
dsimp -- Porting note (#11227):added a `dsimp`
rw [← Category.id_comp f, ← H, ← Category.assoc]
congr 1; apply terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext }
#align skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_is_colimit_of_not_specializes skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfNotSpecializes
/-- If `y ∉ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is isomorphic to a
terminal object.
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializes [HasColimits C] {y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) :
(skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).stalk y ≅ terminal C :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨_, skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfNotSpecializes _ A h⟩
#align skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_not_specializes skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializes
/-- If `y ∉ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is a terminal object
-/
def skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializesIsTerminal [HasColimits C] {y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) :
IsTerminal ((skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).stalk y) :=
IsTerminal.ofIso terminalIsTerminal <| (skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializes _ _ h).symm
#align skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_not_specializes_is_terminal skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializesIsTerminal
theorem skyscraperPresheaf_isSheaf : (skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).IsSheaf := by
classical exact
(Presheaf.isSheaf_iso_iff (eqToIso <| skyscraperPresheaf_eq_pushforward p₀ A)).mpr <|
(Sheaf.pushforward_sheaf_of_sheaf _
(Presheaf.isSheaf_on_punit_of_isTerminal _ (by
dsimp [skyscraperPresheaf]
rw [if_neg]
· exact terminalIsTerminal
· #adaptation_note /-- 2024-03-24
Previously the universe annotation was not needed here. -/
exact Set.not_mem_empty PUnit.unit.{u+1})))
#align skyscraper_presheaf_is_sheaf skyscraperPresheaf_isSheaf
/--
The skyscraper presheaf supported at `p₀` with value `A` is the sheaf that assigns `A` to all opens
`U` that contain `p₀` and assigns `*` otherwise.
-/
def skyscraperSheaf : Sheaf C X :=
⟨skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A, skyscraperPresheaf_isSheaf _ _⟩
#align skyscraper_sheaf skyscraperSheaf
/-- Taking skyscraper sheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
def skyscraperSheafFunctor : C ⥤ Sheaf C X where
obj c := skyscraperSheaf p₀ c
map f := Sheaf.Hom.mk <| (skyscraperPresheafFunctor p₀).map f
map_id _ := Sheaf.Hom.ext _ _ <| (skyscraperPresheafFunctor p₀).map_id _
map_comp _ _ := Sheaf.Hom.ext _ _ <| (skyscraperPresheafFunctor p₀).map_comp _ _
#align skyscraper_sheaf_functor skyscraperSheafFunctor
namespace StalkSkyscraperPresheafAdjunctionAuxs
variable [HasColimits C]
/-- If `f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c`, then a natural transformation `𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c` can be
defined by: `𝓕.germ p₀ ≫ f : 𝓕(U) ⟶ c` if `p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object
if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps]
def toSkyscraperPresheaf {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c) :
𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c where
app U :=
if h : p₀ ∈ U.unop then 𝓕.germ ⟨p₀, h⟩ ≫ f ≫ eqToHom (if_pos h).symm
else ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).from _
naturality U V inc := by
-- Porting note: don't know why original proof fell short of working, add `aesop_cat` finished
-- the proofs anyway
dsimp
by_cases hV : p₀ ∈ V.unop
· have hU : p₀ ∈ U.unop := leOfHom inc.unop hV
split_ifs
· erw [← Category.assoc, 𝓕.germ_res inc.unop, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans]
· aesop_cat
· split_ifs
· exact ((if_neg hV).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext ..
· aesop_cat
#align stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs.to_skyscraper_presheaf StalkSkyscraperPresheafAdjunctionAuxs.toSkyscraperPresheaf
/-- If `f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c` is a natural transformation, then there is a morphism
`𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c` defined as the morphism from colimit to cocone at `c`.
-/
def fromStalk {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c) : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c :=
let χ : Cocone ((OpenNhds.inclusion p₀).op ⋙ 𝓕) :=
Cocone.mk c <|
{ app := fun U => f.app (op U.unop.1) ≫ eqToHom (if_pos U.unop.2)
naturality := fun U V inc => by
dsimp
erw [Category.comp_id, ← Category.assoc, comp_eqToHom_iff, Category.assoc,
eqToHom_trans, f.naturality, skyscraperPresheaf_map]
-- Porting note: added this `dsimp` and `rfl` in the end
dsimp only [skyscraperPresheaf_obj, unop_op, Eq.ndrec]
have hV : p₀ ∈ (OpenNhds.inclusion p₀).obj V.unop := V.unop.2; split_ifs <;>
simp only [comp_eqToHom_iff, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl,
Category.comp_id] <;> rfl }
colimit.desc _ χ
#align stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs.from_stalk StalkSkyscraperPresheafAdjunctionAuxs.fromStalk
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Skyscraper.lean | 302 | 310 | theorem to_skyscraper_fromStalk {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c) :
toSkyscraperPresheaf p₀ (fromStalk _ f) = f := by |
apply NatTrans.ext
ext U
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· erw [← Category.assoc, colimit.ι_desc, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl,
Category.comp_id]
· exact ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext ..
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
#align_import dynamics.circle.rotation_number.translation_number from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open scoped Classical
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift extends ℝ →o ℝ : Type where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
#align circle_deg1_lift CircleDeg1Lift
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mk CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mk
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
#align circle_deg1_lift.monotone CircleDeg1Lift.monotone
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
#align circle_deg1_lift.mono CircleDeg1Lift.mono
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
#align circle_deg1_lift.strict_mono_iff_injective CircleDeg1Lift.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_one
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_one_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_one_add
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.coe_inj -- Use `DFunLike.coe_inj`
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext CircleDeg1Lift.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext_iff CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one f := rfl
one_mul f := rfl
mul_assoc f₁ f₂ f₃ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mul CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_apply CircleDeg1Lift.mul_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_one CircleDeg1Lift.coe_one
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_has_coe_to_fun CircleDeg1Lift.unitsHasCoeToFun
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.units_coe -- now LHS = RHS
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_inv_apply_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_inv_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_apply_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_apply_inv_apply
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' f g := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_symm CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_inv CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_inv
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.is_unit_iff_bijective CircleDeg1Lift.isUnit_iff_bijective
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_pow CircleDeg1Lift.coe_pow
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.semiconj_by_iff_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.semiconjBy_iff_semiconj
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_iff_commute CircleDeg1Lift.commute_iff_commute
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => Multiplicative.toAdd x + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate CircleDeg1Lift.translate
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_inv_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_pow
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_iterate CircleDeg1Lift.translate_iterate
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_nat_add
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_nat
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_nat
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_int
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_int_add
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_add
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_int
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_nat_add
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_nat
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_of_map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq CircleDeg1Lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq
/-!
### Pointwise order on circle maps
-/
/-- Monotone circle maps form a lattice with respect to the pointwise order -/
noncomputable instance : Lattice CircleDeg1Lift where
sup f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => max (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => max_le_max (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
-- TODO: generalize to `Monotone.max`
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [max_add_add_right] }
le f g := ∀ x, f x ≤ g x
le_refl f x := le_refl (f x)
le_trans f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ x := le_trans (h₁₂ x) (h₂₃ x)
le_antisymm f₁ f₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ := ext fun x => le_antisymm (h₁₂ x) (h₂₁ x)
le_sup_left f g x := le_max_left (f x) (g x)
le_sup_right f g x := le_max_right (f x) (g x)
sup_le f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁ h₂ x := max_le (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
inf f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => min (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => min_le_min (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [min_add_add_right] }
inf_le_left f g x := min_le_left (f x) (g x)
inf_le_right f g x := min_le_right (f x) (g x)
le_inf f₁ f₂ f₃ h₂ h₃ x := le_min (h₂ x) (h₃ x)
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊔ g) x = max (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.sup_apply CircleDeg1Lift.sup_apply
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊓ g) x = min (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.inf_apply CircleDeg1Lift.inf_apply
theorem iterate_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f^[n] := fun f _ h =>
f.monotone.iterate_le_of_le h _
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_monotone
theorem iterate_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
iterate_monotone n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_mono CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_mono
theorem pow_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f ^ n ≤ g ^ n := fun x => by
simp only [coe_pow, iterate_mono h n x]
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_mono CircleDeg1Lift.pow_mono
theorem pow_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f ^ n := fun _ _ h => pow_mono h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.pow_monotone
/-!
### Estimates on `(f * g) 0`
We prove the estimates `f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉` and some corollaries with added/removed
floors and ceils.
We also prove that for two semiconjugate maps `g₁`, `g₂`, the distance between `g₁ 0` and `g₂ 0`
is less than two.
-/
theorem map_le_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f x ≤ f 0 + ⌈x⌉ :=
calc
f x ≤ f ⌈x⌉ := f.monotone <| le_ceil _
_ = f 0 + ⌈x⌉ := f.map_int_of_map_zero _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_le_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_le_of_map_zero
theorem map_map_zero_le : f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
f.map_le_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_le
theorem floor_map_map_zero_le : ⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌋ := floor_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ := floor_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.floor_map_map_zero_le
theorem ceil_map_map_zero_le : ⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ := ceil_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le
theorem map_map_zero_lt : f (g 0) < f 0 + g 0 + 1 :=
calc
f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ := f.map_map_zero_le g
_ < f 0 + (g 0 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (ceil_lt_add_one _) _
_ = f 0 + g 0 + 1 := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_lt
theorem le_map_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f 0 + ⌊x⌋ ≤ f x :=
calc
f 0 + ⌊x⌋ = f ⌊x⌋ := (f.map_int_of_map_zero _).symm
_ ≤ f x := f.monotone <| floor_le _
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_of_map_zero
theorem le_map_map_zero : f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) :=
f.le_map_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_map_zero
theorem le_floor_map_map_zero : ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ :=
calc
⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌊f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌋ := (floor_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ := floor_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_floor_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_floor_map_map_zero
theorem le_ceil_map_map_zero : ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌈(f * g) 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌈f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌉ := (ceil_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌈f (g 0)⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero
theorem lt_map_map_zero : f 0 + g 0 - 1 < f (g 0) :=
calc
f 0 + g 0 - 1 = f 0 + (g 0 - 1) := add_sub_assoc _ _ _
_ < f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ := add_lt_add_left (sub_one_lt_floor _) _
_ ≤ f (g 0) := f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_map_zero
theorem dist_map_map_zero_lt : dist (f 0 + g 0) (f (g 0)) < 1 := by
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt', sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact ⟨f.lt_map_map_zero g, f.map_map_zero_lt g⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
calc
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) ≤ dist (g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0) - f 0) + dist _ (g₂ 0) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist (f 0 + g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0)) + dist (g₂ 0 + f 0) (g₂ (f 0)) := by
simp only [h.eq, Real.dist_eq, sub_sub, add_comm (f 0), sub_sub_eq_add_sub,
abs_sub_comm (g₂ (f 0))]
_ < 1 + 1 := add_lt_add (f.dist_map_map_zero_lt g₁) (g₂.dist_map_map_zero_lt f)
_ = 2 := one_add_one_eq_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.1 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy
/-!
### Limits at infinities and continuity
-/
protected theorem tendsto_atBot : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_mono f.map_le_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atBot_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atBot_mono fun x => (ceil_lt_add_one x).le) <|
tendsto_atBot_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_bot CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atBot
protected theorem tendsto_atTop : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono f.le_map_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun x => (sub_one_lt_floor x).le) <| by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_top CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atTop
theorem continuous_iff_surjective : Continuous f ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun h => h.surjective f.tendsto_atTop f.tendsto_atBot, f.monotone.continuous_of_surjective⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.continuous_iff_surjective CircleDeg1Lift.continuous_iff_surjective
/-!
### Estimates on `(f^n) x`
If we know that `f x` is `≤`/`<`/`≥`/`>`/`=` to `x + m`, then we have a similar estimate on
`f^[n] x` and `x + n * m`.
For `≤`, `≥`, and `=` we formulate both `of` (implication) and `iff` versions because implications
work for `n = 0`. For `<` and `>` we formulate only `iff` versions.
-/
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_le_of_map_le f.monotone (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int
theorem le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) (n : ℕ) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).symm.iterate_le_of_map_le (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) f.monotone h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using (f.commute_add_int m).iterate_eq_of_map_eq n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m ↔ f x ≤ x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_le_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_le_iff
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x < x + n * m ↔ f x < x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff
theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m ↔ f x = x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_eq_iff_map_eq f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff
theorem le_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x ↔ x + m ≤ f x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_lt_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_pos_iff
theorem lt_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m < f^[n] x ↔ x + m < f x := by
simpa only [not_le] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_le_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff
theorem mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero (n : ℕ) : ↑n * ⌊f 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f^[n] 0⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ← zero_add ((n : ℝ) * _)]
apply le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
simp [floor_le]
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero CircleDeg1Lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero
/-!
### Definition of translation number
-/
noncomputable section
/-- An auxiliary sequence used to define the translation number. -/
def transnumAuxSeq (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
(f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq
/-- The translation number of a `CircleDeg1Lift`, $τ(f)=\lim_{n→∞}\frac{f^n(x)-x}{n}$. We use
an auxiliary sequence `\frac{f^{2^n}(0)}{2^n}` to define `τ(f)` because some proofs are simpler
this way. -/
def translationNumber : ℝ :=
limUnder atTop f.transnumAuxSeq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber
end
-- TODO: choose two different symbols for `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber` and the future
-- `circle_mono_homeo.rotation_number`, then make them `localized notation`s
local notation "τ" => translationNumber
theorem transnumAuxSeq_def : f.transnumAuxSeq = fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_def CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_def
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux {τ' : ℝ} (h : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 τ')) :
τ f = τ' :=
h.limUnder_eq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto_aux CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n] 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <| by
simpa [(· ∘ ·), transnumAuxSeq_def, coe_pow] using
h.comp (Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀ CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n + 1] 0 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ <| (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast h)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀' CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀'
theorem transnumAuxSeq_zero : f.transnumAuxSeq 0 = f 0 := by simp [transnumAuxSeq]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_zero CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_zero
theorem transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt (n : ℕ) :
dist (f.transnumAuxSeq n) (f.transnumAuxSeq (n + 1)) < 1 / 2 / 2 ^ n := by
have : 0 < (2 ^ (n + 1) : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
rw [div_div, ← pow_succ', ← abs_of_pos this]
replace := abs_pos.2 (ne_of_gt this)
convert (div_lt_div_right this).2 ((f ^ 2 ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (f ^ 2 ^ n)) using 1
simp_rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq]
rw [← abs_div, sub_div, pow_succ, pow_succ', ← two_mul, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
pow_mul, sq, mul_apply]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_dist_lt CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_aux : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(cauchySeq_of_le_geometric_two 1 fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n).tendsto_limUnder
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number_aux CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
theorem dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le : dist (f 0) (τ f) ≤ 1 :=
f.transnumAuxSeq_zero ▸
dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ 1 (fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n)
f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_translation_number_le CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 691 | 701 | theorem tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux (x : ℕ → ℝ) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) (x n) ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => x (2 ^ n) / 2 ^ n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by |
apply f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.congr_dist (squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) _ _)
· exact fun n => C / 2 ^ n
· intro n
have : 0 < (2 ^ n : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
convert (div_le_div_right this).2 (H (2 ^ n)) using 1
rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq, ← sub_div, abs_div, abs_of_pos this, Real.dist_eq]
· exact mul_zero C ▸ tendsto_const_nhds.mul <| tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp <|
tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.list.pairwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Pairwise relations on a list
This file provides basic results about `List.Pairwise` and `List.pwFilter` (definitions are in
`Data.List.Defs`).
`Pairwise r [a 0, ..., a (n - 1)]` means `∀ i j, i < j → r (a i) (a j)`. For example,
`Pairwise (≠) l` means that all elements of `l` are distinct, and `Pairwise (<) l` means that `l`
is strictly increasing.
`pwFilter r l` is the list obtained by iteratively adding each element of `l` that doesn't break
the pairwiseness of the list we have so far. It thus yields `l'` a maximal sublist of `l` such that
`Pairwise r l'`.
## Tags
sorted, nodup
-/
open Nat Function
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*} {R S T : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
mk_iff_of_inductive_prop List.Pairwise List.pairwise_iff
#align list.pairwise_iff List.pairwise_iff
/-! ### Pairwise -/
#align list.pairwise.nil List.Pairwise.nil
#align list.pairwise.cons List.Pairwise.cons
#align list.rel_of_pairwise_cons List.rel_of_pairwise_cons
#align list.pairwise.of_cons List.Pairwise.of_cons
#align list.pairwise.tail List.Pairwise.tail
#align list.pairwise.drop List.Pairwise.drop
#align list.pairwise.imp_of_mem List.Pairwise.imp_of_mem
#align list.pairwise.imp List.Pairwise.impₓ -- Implicits Order
#align list.pairwise_and_iff List.pairwise_and_iff
#align list.pairwise.and List.Pairwise.and
#align list.pairwise.imp₂ List.Pairwise.imp₂
#align list.pairwise.iff_of_mem List.Pairwise.iff_of_mem
#align list.pairwise.iff List.Pairwise.iff
#align list.pairwise_of_forall List.pairwise_of_forall
#align list.pairwise.and_mem List.Pairwise.and_mem
#align list.pairwise.imp_mem List.Pairwise.imp_mem
#align list.pairwise.sublist List.Pairwise.sublistₓ -- Implicits order
#align list.pairwise.forall_of_forall_of_flip List.Pairwise.forall_of_forall_of_flip
theorem Pairwise.forall_of_forall (H : Symmetric R) (H₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, R x x) (H₂ : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → R x y :=
H₂.forall_of_forall_of_flip H₁ <| by rwa [H.flip_eq]
#align list.pairwise.forall_of_forall List.Pairwise.forall_of_forall
| Mathlib/Data/List/Pairwise.lean | 81 | 86 | theorem Pairwise.forall (hR : Symmetric R) (hl : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ l → a ≠ b → R a b := by |
apply Pairwise.forall_of_forall
· exact fun a b h hne => hR (h hne.symm)
· exact fun _ _ hx => (hx rfl).elim
· exact hl.imp (@fun a b h _ => by exact h)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Multilinear.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Units
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Completeness
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Mul
#align_import analysis.normed_space.bounded_linear_maps from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ce11c3c2a285bbe6937e26d9792fda4e51f3fe1a"
/-!
# Bounded linear maps
This file defines a class stating that a map between normed vector spaces is (bi)linear and
continuous.
Instead of asking for continuity, the definition takes the equivalent condition (because the space
is normed) that `‖f x‖` is bounded by a multiple of `‖x‖`. Hence the "bounded" in the name refers to
`‖f x‖/‖x‖` rather than `‖f x‖` itself.
## Main definitions
* `IsBoundedLinearMap`: Class stating that a map `f : E → F` is linear and has `‖f x‖` bounded
by a multiple of `‖x‖`.
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap`: Class stating that a map `f : E × F → G` is bilinear and continuous,
but through the simpler to provide statement that `‖f (x, y)‖` is bounded by a multiple of
`‖x‖ * ‖y‖`
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap.linearDeriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a linear map.
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap.deriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a continuous linear
map. The proof that it is indeed the derivative is `IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` in
`Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv`.
## Main theorems
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap.continuous`: A bounded bilinear map is continuous.
* `ContinuousLinearEquiv.isOpen`: The continuous linear equivalences are an open subset of the
set of continuous linear maps between a pair of Banach spaces. Placed in this file because its
proof uses `IsBoundedBilinearMap.continuous`.
## Notes
The main use of this file is `IsBoundedBilinearMap`.
The file `Analysis.NormedSpace.Multilinear.Basic`
already expounds the theory of multilinear maps,
but the `2`-variables case is sufficiently simpler to currently deserve its own treatment.
`IsBoundedLinearMap` is effectively an unbundled version of `ContinuousLinearMap` (defined
in `Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic`, theory over normed spaces developed in
`Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm`), albeit the name disparity. A bundled
`ContinuousLinearMap` is to be preferred over an `IsBoundedLinearMap` hypothesis. Historical
artifact, really.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology
open Filter (Tendsto)
open Metric ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
/-- A function `f` satisfies `IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f` if it is linear and satisfies the
inequality `‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖` for some positive constant `M`. -/
structure IsBoundedLinearMap (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] (f : E → F) extends
IsLinearMap 𝕜 f : Prop where
bound : ∃ M, 0 < M ∧ ∀ x : E, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖
#align is_bounded_linear_map IsBoundedLinearMap
theorem IsLinearMap.with_bound {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) (M : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x : E, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f :=
⟨hf,
by_cases
(fun (this : M ≤ 0) =>
⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun x =>
(h x).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (this.trans zero_le_one) (norm_nonneg x)⟩)
fun (this : ¬M ≤ 0) => ⟨M, lt_of_not_ge this, h⟩⟩
#align is_linear_map.with_bound IsLinearMap.with_bound
/-- A continuous linear map satisfies `IsBoundedLinearMap` -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.isBoundedLinearMap (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f :=
{ f.toLinearMap.isLinear with bound := f.bound }
#align continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map ContinuousLinearMap.isBoundedLinearMap
namespace IsBoundedLinearMap
/-- Construct a linear map from a function `f` satisfying `IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f`. -/
def toLinearMap (f : E → F) (h : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : E →ₗ[𝕜] F :=
IsLinearMap.mk' _ h.toIsLinearMap
#align is_bounded_linear_map.to_linear_map IsBoundedLinearMap.toLinearMap
/-- Construct a continuous linear map from `IsBoundedLinearMap`. -/
def toContinuousLinearMap {f : E → F} (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
{ toLinearMap f hf with
cont :=
let ⟨C, _, hC⟩ := hf.bound
AddMonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound (toLinearMap f hf) C hC }
#align is_bounded_linear_map.to_continuous_linear_map IsBoundedLinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap
theorem zero : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
(0 : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).isLinear.with_bound 0 <| by simp [le_refl]
#align is_bounded_linear_map.zero IsBoundedLinearMap.zero
theorem id : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun x : E => x :=
LinearMap.id.isLinear.with_bound 1 <| by simp [le_refl]
#align is_bounded_linear_map.id IsBoundedLinearMap.id
theorem fst : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun x : E × F => x.1 := by
refine (LinearMap.fst 𝕜 E F).isLinear.with_bound 1 fun x => ?_
rw [one_mul]
exact le_max_left _ _
#align is_bounded_linear_map.fst IsBoundedLinearMap.fst
theorem snd : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun x : E × F => x.2 := by
refine (LinearMap.snd 𝕜 E F).isLinear.with_bound 1 fun x => ?_
rw [one_mul]
exact le_max_right _ _
#align is_bounded_linear_map.snd IsBoundedLinearMap.snd
variable {f g : E → F}
theorem smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (c • f) :=
let ⟨hlf, M, _, hM⟩ := hf
(c • hlf.mk' f).isLinear.with_bound (‖c‖ * M) fun x =>
calc
‖c • f x‖ = ‖c‖ * ‖f x‖ := norm_smul c (f x)
_ ≤ ‖c‖ * (M * ‖x‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hM _) (norm_nonneg _)
_ = ‖c‖ * M * ‖x‖ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align is_bounded_linear_map.smul IsBoundedLinearMap.smul
theorem neg (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun e => -f e := by
rw [show (fun e => -f e) = fun e => (-1 : 𝕜) • f e by funext; simp]
exact smul (-1) hf
#align is_bounded_linear_map.neg IsBoundedLinearMap.neg
theorem add (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) (hg : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 g) :
IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun e => f e + g e :=
let ⟨hlf, Mf, _, hMf⟩ := hf
let ⟨hlg, Mg, _, hMg⟩ := hg
(hlf.mk' _ + hlg.mk' _).isLinear.with_bound (Mf + Mg) fun x =>
calc
‖f x + g x‖ ≤ Mf * ‖x‖ + Mg * ‖x‖ := norm_add_le_of_le (hMf x) (hMg x)
_ ≤ (Mf + Mg) * ‖x‖ := by rw [add_mul]
#align is_bounded_linear_map.add IsBoundedLinearMap.add
theorem sub (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) (hg : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 g) :
IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun e => f e - g e := by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using add hf (neg hg)
#align is_bounded_linear_map.sub IsBoundedLinearMap.sub
theorem comp {g : F → G} (hg : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 g) (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) :
IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (g ∘ f) :=
(hg.toContinuousLinearMap.comp hf.toContinuousLinearMap).isBoundedLinearMap
#align is_bounded_linear_map.comp IsBoundedLinearMap.comp
protected theorem tendsto (x : E) (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
let ⟨hf, M, _, hM⟩ := hf
tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero.2 <|
squeeze_zero (fun e => norm_nonneg _)
(fun e =>
calc
‖f e - f x‖ = ‖hf.mk' f (e - x)‖ := by rw [(hf.mk' _).map_sub e x]; rfl
_ ≤ M * ‖e - x‖ := hM (e - x)
)
(suffices Tendsto (fun e : E => M * ‖e - x‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (M * 0)) by simpa
tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_norm_sub_self _))
#align is_bounded_linear_map.tendsto IsBoundedLinearMap.tendsto
theorem continuous (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.tendsto _
#align is_bounded_linear_map.continuous IsBoundedLinearMap.continuous
theorem lim_zero_bounded_linear_map (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : Tendsto f (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
(hf.1.mk' _).map_zero ▸ continuous_iff_continuousAt.1 hf.continuous 0
#align is_bounded_linear_map.lim_zero_bounded_linear_map IsBoundedLinearMap.lim_zero_bounded_linear_map
section
open Asymptotics Filter
theorem isBigO_id {f : E → F} (h : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) (l : Filter E) : f =O[l] fun x => x :=
let ⟨_, _, hM⟩ := h.bound
IsBigO.of_bound _ (mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => hM x)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_bounded_linear_map.is_O_id IsBoundedLinearMap.isBigO_id
theorem isBigO_comp {E : Type*} {g : F → G} (hg : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 g) {f : E → F}
(l : Filter E) : (fun x' => g (f x')) =O[l] f :=
(hg.isBigO_id ⊤).comp_tendsto le_top
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_bounded_linear_map.is_O_comp IsBoundedLinearMap.isBigO_comp
theorem isBigO_sub {f : E → F} (h : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) (l : Filter E) (x : E) :
(fun x' => f (x' - x)) =O[l] fun x' => x' - x :=
isBigO_comp h l
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_bounded_linear_map.is_O_sub IsBoundedLinearMap.isBigO_sub
end
end IsBoundedLinearMap
section
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
/-- Taking the cartesian product of two continuous multilinear maps is a bounded linear
operation. -/
theorem isBoundedLinearMap_prod_multilinear {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)]
[∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] :
IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun p : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F × ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G =>
p.1.prod p.2 where
map_add p₁ p₂ := by ext : 1; rfl
map_smul c p := by ext : 1; rfl
bound := by
refine ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun p ↦ ?_⟩
rw [one_mul]
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) _
intro m
rw [ContinuousMultilinearMap.prod_apply, norm_prod_le_iff]
constructor
· exact (p.1.le_opNorm m).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (norm_fst_le p) <| by positivity)
· exact (p.2.le_opNorm m).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (norm_snd_le p) <| by positivity)
#align is_bounded_linear_map_prod_multilinear isBoundedLinearMap_prod_multilinear
/-- Given a fixed continuous linear map `g`, associating to a continuous multilinear map `f` the
continuous multilinear map `f (g m₁, ..., g mₙ)` is a bounded linear operation. -/
theorem isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => E) F =>
f.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
refine
IsLinearMap.with_bound
⟨fun f₁ f₂ => by ext; rfl,
fun c f => by ext; rfl⟩
(‖g‖ ^ Fintype.card ι) fun f => ?_
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ _ _
· apply_rules [mul_nonneg, pow_nonneg, norm_nonneg]
intro m
calc
‖f (g ∘ m)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖g (m i)‖ := f.le_opNorm _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖g‖ * ‖m i‖ := by
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _)
exact Finset.prod_le_prod (fun i _ => norm_nonneg _) fun i _ => g.le_opNorm _
_ = ‖g‖ ^ Fintype.card ι * ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
simp only [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_univ]
ring
#align is_bounded_linear_map_continuous_multilinear_map_comp_linear isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear
end
section BilinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
/-! We prove some computation rules for continuous (semi-)bilinear maps in their first argument.
If `f` is a continuous bilinear map, to use the corresponding rules for the second argument, use
`(f _).map_add` and similar.
We have to assume that `F` and `G` are normed spaces in this section, to use
`ContinuousLinearMap.toNormedAddCommGroup`, but we don't need to assume this for the first
argument of `f`.
-/
variable {R : Type*}
variable {𝕜₂ 𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂]
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂}
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' G']
variable [SMulCommClass 𝕜₂ 𝕜' G']
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {ρ₁₂ : R →+* 𝕜'}
theorem map_add₂ (f : M →SL[ρ₁₂] F →SL[σ₁₂] G') (x x' : M) (y : F) :
f (x + x') y = f x y + f x' y := by rw [f.map_add, add_apply]
#align continuous_linear_map.map_add₂ ContinuousLinearMap.map_add₂
theorem map_zero₂ (f : M →SL[ρ₁₂] F →SL[σ₁₂] G') (y : F) : f 0 y = 0 := by
rw [f.map_zero, zero_apply]
#align continuous_linear_map.map_zero₂ ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero₂
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/BoundedLinearMaps.lean | 293 | 294 | theorem map_smulₛₗ₂ (f : M →SL[ρ₁₂] F →SL[σ₁₂] G') (c : R) (x : M) (y : F) :
f (c • x) y = ρ₁₂ c • f x y := by | rw [f.map_smulₛₗ, smul_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.projection from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b7c740e25651db0ba63648fbae9f9d6f941e31b"
/-!
# The orthogonal projection
Given a nonempty complete subspace `K` of an inner product space `E`, this file constructs
`orthogonalProjection K : E →L[𝕜] K`, the orthogonal projection of `E` onto `K`. This map
satisfies: for any point `u` in `E`, the point `v = orthogonalProjection K u` in `K` minimizes the
distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
Also a linear isometry equivalence `reflection K : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is constructed, by choosing, for
each `u : E`, the point `reflection K u` to satisfy
`u + (reflection K u) = 2 • orthogonalProjection K u`.
Basic API for `orthogonalProjection` and `reflection` is developed.
Next, the orthogonal projection is used to prove a series of more subtle lemmas about the
orthogonal complement of complete subspaces of `E` (the orthogonal complement itself was
defined in `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal`); the lemma
`Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace`, stating that for a complete subspace `K` of `E` we have
`K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤`, is a typical example.
## References
The orthogonal projection construction is adapted from
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
/-- Existence of minimizers
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [_root_.abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by continuity) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
exact this
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
/-- Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superceded by `norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `RCLike` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).2 this
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero
/-- A subspace `K : Submodule 𝕜 E` has an orthogonal projection if evey vector `v : E` admits an
orthogonal projection to `K`. -/
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
HasOrthogonalProjection K where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace K (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero K hwK]
instance [HasOrthogonalProjection K] : HasOrthogonalProjection Kᗮ where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map f.toLinearIsometry) :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : HasOrthogonalProjection (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonalProjection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
#align orthogonal_projection_fn orthogonalProjectionFn
variable {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : orthogonalProjectionFn K v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_mem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : orthogonalProjectionFn K u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u), orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ +
‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ := by
set p := orthogonalProjectionFn K v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_norm_sq orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨orthogonalProjectionFn K v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq K x]
#align orthogonal_projection orthogonalProjection
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
orthogonalProjectionFn K v = (orthogonalProjection K v : E) :=
rfl
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_eq orthogonalProjectionFn_eq
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjection K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
#align orthogonal_projection_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero
/-- The difference of `v` from its orthogonal projection onto `K` is in `Kᗮ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - orthogonalProjection K v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
#align sub_orthogonal_projection_mem_orthogonal sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal' eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal'
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u : E) = u - orthogonalProjection K u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (orthogonalProjection K u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u =
⟨u - orthogonalProjection K u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
/-- The orthogonal projection of `y` on `U` minimizes the distance `‖y - x‖` for `x ∈ U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection U] (y : E) :
‖y - orthogonalProjection U y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero _ (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
#align orthogonal_projection_minimal orthogonalProjection_minimal
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection K']
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = (orthogonalProjection K' u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_submodule eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : orthogonalProjection K v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (orthogonalProjection K v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
#align orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : orthogonalProjection K v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
@[simp]
theorem ker_orthogonalProjection : LinearMap.ker (orthogonalProjection K) = Kᗮ := by
ext; exact orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff
theorem LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] [HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap)]
(x : E) : f (orthogonalProjection p x) = orthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap) (f x) := by
refine (eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ fun y hy => ?_).symm
· refine Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map _ _
rcases hy with ⟨x', hx', rfl : f x' = y⟩
rw [← f.map_sub, f.inner_map_map, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x x' hx']
#align linear_isometry.map_orthogonal_projection LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection
theorem LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] [HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f)] (x : E) :
f (orthogonalProjection p x) = orthogonalProjection (p.map f) (f x) :=
have : HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap) := ‹_›
f.map_orthogonalProjection p x
#align linear_isometry.map_orthogonal_projection' LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection'
/-- Orthogonal projection onto the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] (x : E') :
(orthogonalProjection (p.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x : E') =
f (orthogonalProjection p (f.symm x)) := by
simpa only [f.coe_toLinearIsometry, f.apply_symm_apply] using
(f.toLinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' p (f.symm x)).symm
#align orthogonal_projection_map_apply orthogonalProjection_map_apply
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_bot : orthogonalProjection (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = 0 := by ext
#align orthogonal_projection_bot orthogonalProjection_bot
variable (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_norm_le : ‖orthogonalProjection K‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
#align orthogonal_projection_norm_le orthogonalProjection_norm_le
variable (𝕜)
theorem smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜) • (orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
suffices ((orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) (((‖v‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • w)) : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v by
simpa using this
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
· rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
use ⟪v, w⟫
· rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal', Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, mul_comm]
#align smul_orthogonal_projection_singleton smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
(orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· rw [hv, eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule (Submodule.span_zero_singleton 𝕜)]
simp
have hv' : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv)
have key :
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • ((orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w) : E) =
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v := by
simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w, -ofReal_pow]
convert key using 1 <;> field_simp [hv']
#align orthogonal_projection_singleton orthogonalProjection_singleton
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single unit vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : E) :
(orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
rw [← smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w]
simp [hv]
#align orthogonal_projection_unit_singleton orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton
end orthogonalProjection
section reflection
variable [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
-- Porting note: `bit0` is deprecated.
/-- Auxiliary definition for `reflection`: the reflection as a linear equivalence. -/
def reflectionLinearEquiv : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive
(2 • (K.subtype.comp (orthogonalProjection K).toLinearMap) - LinearMap.id) fun x => by
simp [two_smul]
#align reflection_linear_equiv reflectionLinearEquivₓ
/-- Reflection in a complete subspace of an inner product space. The word "reflection" is
sometimes understood to mean specifically reflection in a codimension-one subspace, and sometimes
more generally to cover operations such as reflection in a point. The definition here, of
reflection in a subspace, is a more general sense of the word that includes both those common
cases. -/
def reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E :=
{ reflectionLinearEquiv K with
norm_map' := by
intro x
dsimp only
let w : K := orthogonalProjection K x
let v := x - w
have : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0 := orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x w w.2
convert norm_sub_eq_norm_add this using 2
· rw [LinearEquiv.coe_mk, reflectionLinearEquiv, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_ofInvolutive, LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, two_smul,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply, Submodule.subtype_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
dsimp [v]
abel
· simp only [v, add_sub_cancel, eq_self_iff_true] }
#align reflection reflection
variable {K}
/-- The result of reflecting. -/
theorem reflection_apply (p : E) : reflection K p = 2 • (orthogonalProjection K p : E) - p :=
rfl
#align reflection_apply reflection_applyₓ
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_symm : (reflection K).symm = reflection K :=
rfl
#align reflection_symm reflection_symm
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_inv : (reflection K)⁻¹ = reflection K :=
rfl
#align reflection_inv reflection_inv
variable (K)
/-- Reflecting twice in the same subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_reflection (p : E) : reflection K (reflection K p) = p :=
(reflection K).left_inv p
#align reflection_reflection reflection_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
theorem reflection_involutive : Function.Involutive (reflection K) :=
reflection_reflection K
#align reflection_involutive reflection_involutive
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_trans_reflection :
(reflection K).trans (reflection K) = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_involutive K
#align reflection_trans_reflection reflection_trans_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_mul_reflection : reflection K * reflection K = 1 :=
reflection_trans_reflection _
#align reflection_mul_reflection reflection_mul_reflection
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 731 | 732 | theorem reflection_orthogonal_apply (v : E) : reflection Kᗮ v = -reflection K v := by |
simp [reflection_apply]; abel
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.