Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposites
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.conjugation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"34020e531ebc4e8aac6d449d9eecbcd1508ea8d0"
/-!
# Conjugations
This file defines the grade reversal and grade involution functions on multivectors, `reverse` and
`involute`.
Together, these operations compose to form the "Clifford conjugate", hence the name of this file.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra#Antiautomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute`: the grade involution, negating each basis vector
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse`: the grade reversion, reversing the order of a product of vectors
## Main statements
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute_commute`
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_mem_evenOdd_iff`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_mem_evenOdd_iff`
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section Involute
/-- Grade involution, inverting the sign of each basis vector. -/
def involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨-ι Q, fun m => by simp⟩
#align clifford_algebra.involute CliffordAlgebra.involute
@[simp]
theorem involute_ι (m : M) : involute (ι Q m) = -ι Q m :=
lift_ι_apply _ _ m
#align clifford_algebra.involute_ι CliffordAlgebra.involute_ι
@[simp]
theorem involute_comp_involute : involute.comp involute = AlgHom.id R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext; simp
#align clifford_algebra.involute_comp_involute CliffordAlgebra.involute_comp_involute
theorem involute_involutive : Function.Involutive (involute : _ → CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun involute_comp_involute
#align clifford_algebra.involute_involutive CliffordAlgebra.involute_involutive
@[simp]
theorem involute_involute : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, involute (involute a) = a :=
involute_involutive
#align clifford_algebra.involute_involute CliffordAlgebra.involute_involute
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.involute` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def involuteEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom involute involute (AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
(AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
#align clifford_algebra.involute_equiv CliffordAlgebra.involuteEquiv
end Involute
section Reverse
open MulOpposite
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as an `AlgHom` to the opposite algebra -/
def reverseOp : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q
⟨(MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv R).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q, fun m => unop_injective <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem reverseOp_ι (m : M) : reverseOp (ι Q m) = op (ι Q m) := lift_ι_apply _ _ _
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverseEquiv` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite algebra -/
@[simps! apply]
def reverseOpEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom reverseOp (AlgHom.opComm reverseOp)
(AlgHom.unop.injective <| hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
(hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem reverseOpEquiv_opComm :
AlgEquiv.opComm (reverseOpEquiv (Q := Q)) = reverseOpEquiv.symm := rfl
/-- Grade reversion, inverting the multiplication order of basis vectors.
Also called *transpose* in some literature. -/
def reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(opLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap.comp reverseOp.toLinearMap
#align clifford_algebra.reverse CliffordAlgebra.reverse
@[simp] theorem unop_reverseOp (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : (reverseOp x).unop = reverse x := rfl
@[simp] theorem op_reverse (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : op (reverse x) = reverseOp x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_ι (m : M) : reverse (ι Q m) = ι Q m := by simp [reverse]
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_ι CliffordAlgebra.reverse_ι
@[simp]
theorem reverse.commutes (r : R) :
reverse (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r) = algebraMap R _ r :=
op_injective <| reverseOp.commutes r
#align clifford_algebra.reverse.commutes CliffordAlgebra.reverse.commutes
@[simp]
theorem reverse.map_one : reverse (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 1 :=
op_injective reverseOp.map_one
#align clifford_algebra.reverse.map_one CliffordAlgebra.reverse.map_one
@[simp]
theorem reverse.map_mul (a b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
reverse (a * b) = reverse b * reverse a :=
op_injective (reverseOp.map_mul a b)
#align clifford_algebra.reverse.map_mul CliffordAlgebra.reverse.map_mul
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Function.Involutive (reverse (Q := Q)) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun reverseOpEquiv.symm_comp
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_involutive CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_comp_reverse :
reverse.comp reverse = (LinearMap.id : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
LinearMap.ext reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (reverse a) = a :=
reverse_involutive
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_reverse CliffordAlgebra.reverse_reverse
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def reverseEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive reverse reverse_involutive
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_equiv CliffordAlgebra.reverseEquiv
theorem reverse_comp_involute :
reverse.comp involute.toLinearMap =
(involute.toLinearMap.comp reverse : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap => simp
| ι => simp
| mul a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_mul, AlgHom.map_mul]
| add a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_add, AlgHom.map_add]
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_comp_involute CliffordAlgebra.reverse_comp_involute
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` and `CliffordAlgebra.involute` commute. Note that the composition
is sometimes referred to as the "clifford conjugate". -/
theorem reverse_involute_commute : Function.Commute (reverse (Q := Q)) involute :=
LinearMap.congr_fun reverse_comp_involute
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_involute_commute CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute_commute
theorem reverse_involute :
∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (involute a) = involute (reverse a) :=
reverse_involute_commute
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_involute CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute
end Reverse
/-!
### Statements about conjugations of products of lists
-/
section List
/-- Taking the reverse of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
taking the product of the reverse of that list. -/
theorem reverse_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, reverse (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (l.map <| ι Q).reverse.prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [reverse_prod_map_ι xs]
#align clifford_algebra.reverse_prod_map_ι CliffordAlgebra.reverse_prod_map_ι
/-- Taking the involute of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
premultiplying by ${-1}^n$. -/
theorem involute_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, involute (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (-1 : R) ^ l.length • (l.map <| ι Q).prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [pow_succ, involute_prod_map_ι xs]
#align clifford_algebra.involute_prod_map_ι CliffordAlgebra.involute_prod_map_ι
end List
/-!
### Statements about `Submodule.map` and `Submodule.comap`
-/
section Submodule
variable (Q)
section Involute
theorem submodule_map_involute_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
p.comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm involuteEquiv.toLinearEquiv _
#align clifford_algebra.submodule_map_involute_eq_comap CliffordAlgebra.submodule_map_involute_eq_comap
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_involute :
(ι Q).range.map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) :=
(ι_range_map_lift _ _).trans (LinearMap.range_neg _)
#align clifford_algebra.ι_range_map_involute CliffordAlgebra.ι_range_map_involute
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_involute :
(ι Q).range.comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, ι_range_map_involute]
#align clifford_algebra.ι_range_comap_involute CliffordAlgebra.ι_range_comap_involute
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_map_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.map_iSup, Submodule.map_pow, ι_range_map_involute]
#align clifford_algebra.even_odd_map_involute CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd_map_involute
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_comap_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, evenOdd_map_involute]
#align clifford_algebra.even_odd_comap_involute CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd_comap_involute
end Involute
section Reverse
theorem submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (reverseEquiv : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) _
#align clifford_algebra.submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap CliffordAlgebra.submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_reverse :
(ι Q).range.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [reverse, reverseOp, Submodule.map_comp, ι_range_map_lift, LinearMap.range_comp,
← Submodule.map_comp]
exact Submodule.map_id _
#align clifford_algebra.ι_range_map_reverse CliffordAlgebra.ι_range_map_reverse
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_reverse :
(ι Q).range.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, ι_range_map_reverse]
#align clifford_algebra.ι_range_comap_reverse CliffordAlgebra.ι_range_comap_reverse
/-- Like `Submodule.map_mul`, but with the multiplication reversed. -/
theorem submodule_map_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_mul, Submodule.map_unop_mul]
#align clifford_algebra.submodule_map_mul_reverse CliffordAlgebra.submodule_map_mul_reverse
theorem submodule_comap_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, submodule_map_mul_reverse]
#align clifford_algebra.submodule_comap_mul_reverse CliffordAlgebra.submodule_comap_mul_reverse
/-- Like `Submodule.map_pow` -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Conjugation.lean | 289 | 292 | theorem submodule_map_pow_reverse (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) ^ n := by |
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_pow, Submodule.map_unop_pow]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
#align_import data.finset.card from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `s.card : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
-- TODO: After a lot more work,
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
#align finset.card Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : s.card = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_def Finset.card_def
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = s.card := rfl
#align finset.card_val Finset.card_val
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : (⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α).card = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
#align finset.card_mk Finset.card_mk
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : card (∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_empty Finset.card_empty
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → s.card ≤ t.card :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
#align finset.card_le_of_subset Finset.card_le_card
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
#align finset.card_mono Finset.card_mono
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : s.card = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : s.card ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma card_pos : 0 < s.card ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
#align finset.card_eq_zero Finset.card_eq_zero
#align finset.card_pos Finset.card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
#align finset.nonempty.card_pos Finset.Nonempty.card_pos
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s.card ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
#align finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem Finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : Finset α) = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
#align finset.card_singleton Finset.card_singleton
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : ({a} ∩ s).card ≤ 1 := by
cases' Finset.decidableMem a s with h h
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.card_singleton_inter Finset.card_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).card = s.card + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
#align finset.card_cons Finset.card_cons
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).card = s.card + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
#align finset.card_insert_of_not_mem Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : card (insert a s) = s.card := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align finset.card_insert_of_mem Finset.card_insert_of_mem
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : card (insert a s) ≤ s.card + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.card_insert_le Finset.card_insert_le
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : card {a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : card {a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : card {a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : card {a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : card {a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : card (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.card else s.card + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
#align finset.card_insert_eq_ite Finset.card_insert_eq_ite
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : ({a,b} : Finset α).card = 1 ∨ ({a,b} : Finset α).card = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Finset α).card = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
#align finset.card_doubleton Finset.card_pair
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-04")] alias card_doubleton := Finset.card_pair
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card = s.card - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
#align finset.card_erase_of_mem Finset.card_erase_of_mem
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$.
This result is casted to any additive group with 1,
so that we don't have to work with `ℕ`-subtraction. -/
@[simp]
theorem cast_card_erase_of_mem {R} [AddGroupWithOne R] {s : Finset α} (hs : a ∈ s) :
((s.erase a).card : R) = s.card - 1 := by
rw [card_erase_of_mem hs, Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rw [Nat.add_one_le_iff, Finset.card_pos]
exact ⟨a, hs⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card + 1 = s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
#align finset.card_erase_add_one Finset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card < s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
#align finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : (s.erase a).card ≤ s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
#align finset.card_erase_le Finset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : s.card - 1 ≤ (s.erase a).card := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
#align finset.pred_card_le_card_erase Finset.pred_card_le_card_erase
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : (s.erase a).card = if a ∈ s then s.card - 1 else s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
#align finset.card_erase_eq_ite Finset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : (range n).card = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
#align finset.card_range Finset.card_range
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : s.attach.card = s.card :=
Multiset.card_attach
#align finset.card_attach Finset.card_attach
end Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : m.toFinset.card = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
#align multiset.card_to_finset Multiset.card_toFinset
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : m.toFinset.card ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
#align multiset.to_finset_card_le Multiset.toFinset_card_le
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
m.toFinset.card = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
#align multiset.to_finset_card_of_nodup Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
m.toFinset.card = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : l.toFinset.card = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
#align list.card_to_finset List.card_toFinset
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : l.toFinset.card ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
#align list.to_finset_card_le List.toFinset_card_le
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : l.toFinset.card = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
#align list.to_finset_card_of_nodup List.toFinset_card_of_nodup
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = s.card := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
#align finset.length_to_list Finset.length_toList
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : (s.image f).card ≤ s.card := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
#align finset.card_image_le Finset.card_image_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (s.image f).card = s.card := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
#align finset.card_image_of_inj_on Finset.card_image_of_injOn
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : (s.image f).card = s.card) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
#align finset.inj_on_of_card_image_eq Finset.injOn_of_card_image_eq
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : (s.image f).card = s.card ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
#align finset.card_image_iff Finset.card_image_iff
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
(s.image f).card = s.card :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
#align finset.card_image_of_injective Finset.card_image_of_injective
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
(s.filter fun x => f x = y).card ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
#align finset.fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image Finset.fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
(s.filter P).card ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < s'.card → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun x hx ↦ subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : (s.map f).card = s.card :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
#align finset.card_map Finset.card_map
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
(s.subtype p).card = (s.filter p).card := by simp [Finset.subtype]
#align finset.card_subtype Finset.card_subtype
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.filter p).card ≤ s.card :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
#align finset.card_filter_le Finset.card_filter_le
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t.card ≤ s.card) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
#align finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.card ≤ s.card) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
#align finset.eq_of_superset_of_card_ge Finset.eq_of_superset_of_card_ge
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : t.card ≤ s.card) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
#align finset.subset_iff_eq_of_card_le Finset.subset_iff_eq_of_card_le
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
#align finset.map_eq_of_subset Finset.map_eq_of_subset
theorem filter_card_eq {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : (s.filter p).card = s.card) (x : α)
(hx : x ∈ s) : p x := by
rw [← eq_of_subset_of_card_le (s.filter_subset p) h.ge, mem_filter] at hx
exact hx.2
#align finset.filter_card_eq Finset.filter_card_eq
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : s.card < t.card := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
#align finset.card_lt_card Finset.card_lt_card
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.card = n := by
classical
have : s = (range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2) := by
ext a
suffices _ : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ (i : _) (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a by
simpa only [mem_image, mem_attach, true_and_iff, Subtype.exists]
constructor
· intro ha; obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf a ha; use i, mem_range.2 hi
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; apply hf'
calc
s.card = ((range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)).card := by rw [this]
_ = (range n).attach.card := ?_
_ = (range n).card := card_attach
_ = n := card_range n
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq
exact Subtype.eq <| f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
#align finset.card_eq_of_bijective Finset.card_eq_of_bijective
section bij
variable {t : Finset β}
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
lemma card_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) : s.card = t.card := by
classical
calc
s.card = s.attach.card := card_attach.symm
_ = (s.attach.image fun a : { a // a ∈ s } => i a.1 a.2).card := Eq.symm ?_
_ = t.card := ?_
· apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
simpa using i_inj _ _ _ _ h
· congr 1
ext b
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h; apply hi
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := i_surj b h; exact mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simp⟩
#align finset.card_bij Finset.card_bij
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias card_congr := card_bij
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
lemma card_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, α) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) : s.card = t.card := by
refine card_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩)
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain. -/
lemma card_nbij (i : α → β) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set α).SurjOn i t) : s.card = t.card :=
card_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj)
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains.
The difference with `Finset.card_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains,
rather than on the entire types. -/
lemma card_nbij' (i : α → β) (j : β → α) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a) : s.card = t.card :=
card_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) : s.card = t.card := by
refine card_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [hst]
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_bijective (e : α → β) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) :
s.card = t.card := card_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst
end bij
theorem card_le_card_of_inj_on {t : Finset β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(f_inj : ∀ a₁ ∈ s, ∀ a₂ ∈ s, f a₁ = f a₂ → a₁ = a₂) : s.card ≤ t.card := by
classical
calc
s.card = (s.image f).card := (card_image_of_injOn f_inj).symm
_ ≤ t.card := card_le_card <| image_subset_iff.2 hf
#align finset.card_le_card_of_inj_on Finset.card_le_card_of_inj_on
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : Finset β} (hc : t.card < s.card) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) : ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
classical
by_contra! hz
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_inj_on f hf ?_)
intro x hx y hy
contrapose
exact hz x hx y hy
#align finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to Finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to
theorem le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ s.card :=
calc
n = card (range n) := (card_range n).symm
_ ≤ s.card := card_le_card_of_inj_on f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa only [mem_range])
#align finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le {t : Finset β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.card ≤ s.card) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
classical
intro b hb
have h : (s.attach.image fun a : { a // a ∈ s } => f a a.prop).card = s.card := by
rw [← @card_attach _ s]
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
exact Subtype.eq <| hinj _ _ _ _ h
have h' : image (fun a : { a // a ∈ s } => f a a.prop) s.attach = t := by
apply eq_of_subset_of_card_le
· intro b h
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h
apply hf
· simp [hst, h]
rw [← h'] at hb
obtain ⟨a, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 hb
use a, a.2
#align finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le {t : Finset β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.card ≤ t.card) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ :=
haveI : Inhabited { x // x ∈ s } := ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁⟩⟩
let f' : { x // x ∈ s } → { x // x ∈ t } := fun x => ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf x.1 x.2⟩
let g : { x // x ∈ t } → { x // x ∈ s } :=
@surjInv _ _ f' fun x =>
let ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := hsurj x.1 x.2
⟨⟨y, hy₁⟩, Subtype.eq hy₂⟩
have hg : Injective g := injective_surjInv _
have hsg : Surjective g := fun x =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ :=
surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (fun (x : { x // x ∈ t }) (_ : x ∈ t.attach) => g x)
(fun x _ => show g x ∈ s.attach from mem_attach _ _) (fun x y _ _ hxy => hg hxy) (by simpa)
x (mem_attach _ _)
⟨y, hy.snd.symm⟩
have hif : Injective f' :=
(leftInverse_of_surjective_of_rightInverse hsg (rightInverse_surjInv _)).injective
Subtype.ext_iff_val.1 (@hif ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (Subtype.eq ha₁a₂))
#align finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le
@[simp]
theorem card_disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h) : (s.disjUnion t h).card = s.card + t.card :=
Multiset.card_add _ _
#align finset.card_disj_union Finset.card_disjUnion
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem card_union_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∪ t).card + (s ∩ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
Finset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a r har h => by by_cases a ∈ s <;>
simp [*, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm _ 1]
#align finset.card_union_add_card_inter Finset.card_union_add_card_inter
theorem card_inter_add_card_union (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∩ t).card + (s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card := by rw [add_comm, card_union_add_card_inter]
#align finset.card_inter_add_card_union Finset.card_inter_add_card_union
lemma card_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card - (s ∩ t).card := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma card_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).card = s.card + t.card - (s ∪ t).card := by
rw [← card_inter_add_card_union, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
theorem card_union_le (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).card ≤ s.card + t.card :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align finset.card_union_le Finset.card_union_le
lemma card_union_eq_card_add_card : (s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter]; simp [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, card_union_of_disjoint⟩ := card_union_eq_card_add_card
#align finset.card_union_eq Finset.card_union_of_disjoint
#align finset.card_disjoint_union Finset.card_union_of_disjoint
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-09")] alias card_union_eq := card_union_of_disjoint
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-09")] alias card_disjoint_union := card_union_of_disjoint
lemma cast_card_inter [AddGroupWithOne R] :
((s ∩ t).card : R) = s.card + t.card - (s ∪ t).card := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← cast_add, card_inter_add_card_union, cast_add]
lemma cast_card_union [AddGroupWithOne R] :
((s ∪ t).card : R) = s.card + t.card - (s ∩ t).card := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← cast_add, card_union_add_card_inter, cast_add]
theorem card_sdiff (h : s ⊆ t) : card (t \ s) = t.card - s.card := by
suffices card (t \ s) = card (t \ s ∪ s) - s.card by rwa [sdiff_union_of_subset h] at this
rw [card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_sdiff Finset.card_sdiff
lemma cast_card_sdiff [AddGroupWithOne R] (h : s ⊆ t) : ((t \ s).card : R) = t.card - s.card := by
rw [card_sdiff h, Nat.cast_sub (card_mono h)]
theorem card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : card (t \ s) + card s = card t :=
((Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (card_le_card h)).mp (card_sdiff h).symm).symm
#align finset.card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card Finset.card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card
theorem le_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) : t.card - s.card ≤ card (t \ s) :=
calc
card t - card s ≤ card t - card (s ∩ t) :=
Nat.sub_le_sub_left (card_le_card inter_subset_left) _
_ = card (t \ (s ∩ t)) := (card_sdiff inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ card (t \ s) := by rw [sdiff_inter_self_right t s]
#align finset.le_card_sdiff Finset.le_card_sdiff
theorem card_le_card_sdiff_add_card : s.card ≤ (s \ t).card + t.card :=
Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 <| le_card_sdiff _ _
#align finset.card_le_card_sdiff_add_card Finset.card_le_card_sdiff_add_card
theorem card_sdiff_add_card : (s \ t).card + t.card = (s ∪ t).card := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
#align finset.card_sdiff_add_card Finset.card_sdiff_add_card
lemma card_sdiff_comm (h : s.card = t.card) : (s \ t).card = (t \ s).card :=
add_left_injective t.card <| by
simp_rw [card_sdiff_add_card, ← h, card_sdiff_add_card, union_comm]
@[simp]
lemma card_sdiff_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
(s \ t).card + (s ∩ t).card = s.card := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_sdiff_inter _ _), sdiff_union_inter]
@[simp]
lemma card_inter_add_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∩ t).card + (s \ t).card = s.card := by
rw [add_comm, card_sdiff_add_card_inter]
end Lattice
theorem filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card
(p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
(s.filter p).card + (s.filter (fun a => ¬ p a)).card = s.card := by
classical
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg _ _ _), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card Finset.filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card
/-- Given a set `A` and a set `B` inside it, we can shrink `A` to any appropriate size, and keep `B`
inside it. -/
theorem exists_intermediate_set {A B : Finset α} (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i + card B ≤ card A) (h₂ : B ⊆ A) :
∃ C : Finset α, B ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A ∧ card C = i + card B := by
classical
rcases Nat.le.dest h₁ with ⟨k, h⟩
clear h₁
induction' k with k ih generalizing A
· exact ⟨A, h₂, Subset.refl _, h.symm⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : (A \ B).Nonempty := by rw [← card_pos, card_sdiff h₂]; omega
have z : i + card B + k = card (erase A a) := by
rw [card_erase_of_mem (mem_sdiff.1 ha).1, ← h,
Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr k.succ_ne_zero), ← pred_eq_sub_one,
k.pred_succ]
have : B ⊆ A.erase a := by
rintro t th
apply mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem _ (h₂ th)
rintro rfl
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right th ha
rcases ih this z with ⟨B', hB', B'subA', cards⟩
exact ⟨B', hB', B'subA'.trans (erase_subset _ _), cards⟩
#align finset.exists_intermediate_set Finset.exists_intermediate_set
/-- We can shrink `A` to any smaller size. -/
theorem exists_smaller_set (A : Finset α) (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i ≤ card A) :
∃ B : Finset α, B ⊆ A ∧ card B = i :=
let ⟨B, _, x₁, x₂⟩ := exists_intermediate_set i (by simpa) (empty_subset A)
⟨B, x₁, x₂⟩
#align finset.exists_smaller_set Finset.exists_smaller_set
theorem le_card_iff_exists_subset_card : n ≤ s.card ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, t.card = n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨t, hst, ht⟩ => ht ▸ card_le_card hst⟩
exact exists_smaller_set s n h
theorem exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card [DecidableEq α] {X Y : Finset α} {n : ℕ}
(hXY : 2 * n < (X ∪ Y).card) : ∃ C : Finset α, n < C.card ∧ (C ⊆ X ∨ C ⊆ Y) := by
have h₁ : (X ∩ (Y \ X)).card = 0 := Finset.card_eq_zero.mpr (Finset.inter_sdiff_self X Y)
have h₂ : (X ∪ Y).card = X.card + (Y \ X).card := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter X (Y \ X), Finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union, h₁, add_zero]
rw [h₂, Nat.two_mul] at hXY
obtain h | h : n < X.card ∨ n < (Y \ X).card := by contrapose! hXY; omega
· exact ⟨X, h, Or.inl (Finset.Subset.refl X)⟩
· exact ⟨Y \ X, h, Or.inr sdiff_subset⟩
#align finset.exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card Finset.exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card
/-! ### Explicit description of a finset from its card -/
theorem card_eq_one : s.card = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
cases s
simp only [Multiset.card_eq_one, Finset.card, ← val_inj, singleton_val]
#align finset.card_eq_one Finset.card_eq_one
theorem _root_.Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_one_iff [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.toFinset.card = 1 ↔ Multiset.card s ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ a : α, s = Multiset.card s • {a} := by
simp_rw [card_eq_one, Multiset.toFinset_eq_singleton_iff, exists_and_left]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 673 | 685 | theorem exists_eq_insert_iff [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} :
(∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t) ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s.card + 1 = t.card := by |
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨subset_insert _ _, (card_insert_of_not_mem ha).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨hst, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, t \ s = {a} :=
card_eq_one.1 (by rw [card_sdiff hst, ← h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left])
refine
⟨a, fun hs => (?_ : a ∉ {a}) <| mem_singleton_self _, by
rw [insert_eq, ← ha, sdiff_union_of_subset hst]⟩
rw [← ha]
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right hs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
#align_import group_theory.index from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
/-!
# Index of a Subgroup
In this file we define the index of a subgroup, and prove several divisibility properties.
Several theorems proved in this file are known as Lagrange's theorem.
## Main definitions
- `H.index` : the index of `H : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the index is infinite.
- `H.relindex K` : the relative index of `H : Subgroup G` in `K : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite.
# Main results
- `card_mul_index` : `Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G`
- `index_mul_card` : `H.index * Fintype.card H = Fintype.card G`
- `index_dvd_card` : `H.index ∣ Fintype.card G`
- `relindex_mul_index` : If `H ≤ K`, then `H.relindex K * K.index = H.index`
- `index_dvd_of_le` : If `H ≤ K`, then `K.index ∣ H.index`
- `relindex_mul_relindex` : `relindex` is multiplicative in towers
-/
namespace Subgroup
open Cardinal
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H K L : Subgroup G)
/-- The index of a subgroup as a natural number, and returns 0 if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "The index of a subgroup as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def index : ℕ :=
Nat.card (G ⧸ H)
#align subgroup.index Subgroup.index
#align add_subgroup.index AddSubgroup.index
/-- The relative index of a subgroup as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "The relative index of a subgroup as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite."]
noncomputable def relindex : ℕ :=
(H.subgroupOf K).index
#align subgroup.relindex Subgroup.relindex
#align add_subgroup.relindex AddSubgroup.relindex
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap_of_surjective {G' : Type*} [Group G'] {f : G' →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (H.comap f).index = H.index := by
letI := QuotientGroup.leftRel H
letI := QuotientGroup.leftRel (H.comap f)
have key : ∀ x y : G', Setoid.r x y ↔ Setoid.r (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
exact fun x y => iff_of_eq (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (by rw [f.map_mul, f.map_inv]))
refine Cardinal.toNat_congr (Equiv.ofBijective (Quotient.map' f fun x y => (key x y).mp) ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· simp_rw [← Quotient.eq''] at key
refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
refine Quotient.ind' fun y => ?_
exact (key x y).mpr
· refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
exact ⟨y, (Quotient.map'_mk'' f _ y).trans (congr_arg Quotient.mk'' hy)⟩
#align subgroup.index_comap_of_surjective Subgroup.index_comap_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.index_comap_of_surjective AddSubgroup.index_comap_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap {G' : Type*} [Group G'] (f : G' →* G) :
(H.comap f).index = H.relindex f.range :=
Eq.trans (congr_arg index (by rfl))
((H.subgroupOf f.range).index_comap_of_surjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective)
#align subgroup.index_comap Subgroup.index_comap
#align add_subgroup.index_comap AddSubgroup.index_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_comap {G' : Type*} [Group G'] (f : G' →* G) (K : Subgroup G') :
relindex (comap f H) K = relindex H (map f K) := by
rw [relindex, subgroupOf, comap_comap, index_comap, ← f.map_range, K.subtype_range]
#align subgroup.relindex_comap Subgroup.relindex_comap
#align add_subgroup.relindex_comap AddSubgroup.relindex_comap
variable {H K L}
@[to_additive relindex_mul_index]
theorem relindex_mul_index (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K * K.index = H.index :=
((mul_comm _ _).trans (Cardinal.toNat_mul _ _).symm).trans
(congr_arg Cardinal.toNat (Equiv.cardinal_eq (quotientEquivProdOfLE h))).symm
#align subgroup.relindex_mul_index Subgroup.relindex_mul_index
#align add_subgroup.relindex_mul_index AddSubgroup.relindex_mul_index
@[to_additive]
theorem index_dvd_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : K.index ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_left_eq (H.relindex K) (relindex_mul_index h)
#align subgroup.index_dvd_of_le Subgroup.index_dvd_of_le
#align add_subgroup.index_dvd_of_le AddSubgroup.index_dvd_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_right_eq K.index (relindex_mul_index h)
#align subgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_le Subgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_le
#align add_subgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_le AddSubgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_subgroupOf (hKL : K ≤ L) :
(H.subgroupOf L).relindex (K.subgroupOf L) = H.relindex K :=
((index_comap (H.subgroupOf L) (inclusion hKL)).trans (congr_arg _ (inclusion_range hKL))).symm
#align subgroup.relindex_subgroup_of Subgroup.relindex_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.relindex_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.relindex_addSubgroupOf
variable (H K L)
@[to_additive relindex_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_mul_relindex (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) :
H.relindex K * K.relindex L = H.relindex L := by
rw [← relindex_subgroupOf hKL]
exact relindex_mul_index fun x hx => hHK hx
#align subgroup.relindex_mul_relindex Subgroup.relindex_mul_relindex
#align add_subgroup.relindex_mul_relindex AddSubgroup.relindex_mul_relindex
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_right : (H ⊓ K).relindex K = H.relindex K := by
rw [relindex, relindex, inf_subgroupOf_right]
#align subgroup.inf_relindex_right Subgroup.inf_relindex_right
#align add_subgroup.inf_relindex_right AddSubgroup.inf_relindex_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_left : (H ⊓ K).relindex H = K.relindex H := by
rw [inf_comm, inf_relindex_right]
#align subgroup.inf_relindex_left Subgroup.inf_relindex_left
#align add_subgroup.inf_relindex_left AddSubgroup.inf_relindex_left
@[to_additive relindex_inf_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_inf_mul_relindex : H.relindex (K ⊓ L) * K.relindex L = (H ⊓ K).relindex L := by
rw [← inf_relindex_right H (K ⊓ L), ← inf_relindex_right K L, ← inf_relindex_right (H ⊓ K) L,
inf_assoc, relindex_mul_relindex (H ⊓ (K ⊓ L)) (K ⊓ L) L inf_le_right inf_le_right]
#align subgroup.relindex_inf_mul_relindex Subgroup.relindex_inf_mul_relindex
#align add_subgroup.relindex_inf_mul_relindex AddSubgroup.relindex_inf_mul_relindex
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_right [K.Normal] : K.relindex (H ⊔ K) = K.relindex H :=
Nat.card_congr (QuotientGroup.quotientInfEquivProdNormalQuotient H K).toEquiv.symm
#align subgroup.relindex_sup_right Subgroup.relindex_sup_right
#align add_subgroup.relindex_sup_right AddSubgroup.relindex_sup_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_left [K.Normal] : K.relindex (K ⊔ H) = K.relindex H := by
rw [sup_comm, relindex_sup_right]
#align subgroup.relindex_sup_left Subgroup.relindex_sup_left
#align add_subgroup.relindex_sup_left AddSubgroup.relindex_sup_left
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_normal [H.Normal] : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
relindex_sup_right K H ▸ relindex_dvd_index_of_le le_sup_right
#align subgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_normal Subgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_normal
#align add_subgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_normal AddSubgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_normal
variable {H K}
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_of_le_left (hHK : H ≤ K) : K.relindex L ∣ H.relindex L :=
inf_of_le_left hHK ▸ dvd_of_mul_left_eq _ (relindex_inf_mul_relindex _ _ _)
#align subgroup.relindex_dvd_of_le_left Subgroup.relindex_dvd_of_le_left
#align add_subgroup.relindex_dvd_of_le_left AddSubgroup.relindex_dvd_of_le_left
/-- A subgroup has index two if and only if there exists `a` such that for all `b`, exactly one
of `b * a` and `b` belong to `H`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup has index two if and only if there exists `a` such that
for all `b`, exactly one of `b + a` and `b` belong to `H`."]
theorem index_eq_two_iff : H.index = 2 ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b, Xor' (b * a ∈ H) (b ∈ H) := by
simp only [index, Nat.card_eq_two_iff' ((1 : G) : G ⧸ H), ExistsUnique, inv_mem_iff,
QuotientGroup.exists_mk, QuotientGroup.forall_mk, Ne, QuotientGroup.eq, mul_one,
xor_iff_iff_not]
refine exists_congr fun a =>
⟨fun ha b => ⟨fun hba hb => ?_, fun hb => ?_⟩, fun ha => ⟨?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩⟩
· exact ha.1 ((mul_mem_cancel_left hb).1 hba)
· exact inv_inv b ▸ ha.2 _ (mt (inv_mem_iff (x := b)).1 hb)
· rw [← inv_mem_iff (x := a), ← ha, inv_mul_self]
exact one_mem _
· rwa [ha, inv_mem_iff (x := b)]
#align subgroup.index_eq_two_iff Subgroup.index_eq_two_iff
#align add_subgroup.index_eq_two_iff AddSubgroup.index_eq_two_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_iff_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) {a b : G} : a * b ∈ H ↔ (a ∈ H ↔ b ∈ H) := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ H; · simp only [ha, true_iff_iff, mul_mem_cancel_left ha]
by_cases hb : b ∈ H; · simp only [hb, iff_true_iff, mul_mem_cancel_right hb]
simp only [ha, hb, iff_self_iff, iff_true_iff]
rcases index_eq_two_iff.1 h with ⟨c, hc⟩
refine (hc _).or.resolve_left ?_
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_mem_cancel_right ((hc _).or.resolve_right hb)]
#align subgroup.mul_mem_iff_of_index_two Subgroup.mul_mem_iff_of_index_two
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_iff_of_index_two AddSubgroup.add_mem_iff_of_index_two
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_self_mem_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) (a : G) : a * a ∈ H := by
rw [mul_mem_iff_of_index_two h]
#align subgroup.mul_self_mem_of_index_two Subgroup.mul_self_mem_of_index_two
#align add_subgroup.add_self_mem_of_index_two AddSubgroup.add_self_mem_of_index_two
@[to_additive two_smul_mem_of_index_two]
theorem sq_mem_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) (a : G) : a ^ 2 ∈ H :=
(pow_two a).symm ▸ mul_self_mem_of_index_two h a
#align subgroup.sq_mem_of_index_two Subgroup.sq_mem_of_index_two
#align add_subgroup.two_smul_mem_of_index_two AddSubgroup.two_smul_mem_of_index_two
variable (H K)
-- Porting note: had to replace `Cardinal.toNat_eq_one_iff_unique` with `Nat.card_eq_one_iff_unique`
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem index_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).index = 1 :=
Nat.card_eq_one_iff_unique.mpr ⟨QuotientGroup.subsingleton_quotient_top, ⟨1⟩⟩
#align subgroup.index_top Subgroup.index_top
#align add_subgroup.index_top AddSubgroup.index_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem index_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).index = Nat.card G :=
Cardinal.toNat_congr QuotientGroup.quotientBot.toEquiv
#align subgroup.index_bot Subgroup.index_bot
#align add_subgroup.index_bot AddSubgroup.index_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem index_bot_eq_card [Fintype G] : (⊥ : Subgroup G).index = Fintype.card G :=
index_bot.trans Nat.card_eq_fintype_card
#align subgroup.index_bot_eq_card Subgroup.index_bot_eq_card
#align add_subgroup.index_bot_eq_card AddSubgroup.index_bot_eq_card
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_top_left : (⊤ : Subgroup G).relindex H = 1 :=
index_top
#align subgroup.relindex_top_left Subgroup.relindex_top_left
#align add_subgroup.relindex_top_left AddSubgroup.relindex_top_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_top_right : H.relindex ⊤ = H.index := by
rw [← relindex_mul_index (show H ≤ ⊤ from le_top), index_top, mul_one]
#align subgroup.relindex_top_right Subgroup.relindex_top_right
#align add_subgroup.relindex_top_right AddSubgroup.relindex_top_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_bot_left : (⊥ : Subgroup G).relindex H = Nat.card H := by
rw [relindex, bot_subgroupOf, index_bot]
#align subgroup.relindex_bot_left Subgroup.relindex_bot_left
#align add_subgroup.relindex_bot_left AddSubgroup.relindex_bot_left
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_bot_left_eq_card [Fintype H] : (⊥ : Subgroup G).relindex H = Fintype.card H :=
H.relindex_bot_left.trans Nat.card_eq_fintype_card
#align subgroup.relindex_bot_left_eq_card Subgroup.relindex_bot_left_eq_card
#align add_subgroup.relindex_bot_left_eq_card AddSubgroup.relindex_bot_left_eq_card
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_bot_right : H.relindex ⊥ = 1 := by rw [relindex, subgroupOf_bot_eq_top, index_top]
#align subgroup.relindex_bot_right Subgroup.relindex_bot_right
#align add_subgroup.relindex_bot_right AddSubgroup.relindex_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_self : H.relindex H = 1 := by rw [relindex, subgroupOf_self, index_top]
#align subgroup.relindex_self Subgroup.relindex_self
#align add_subgroup.relindex_self AddSubgroup.relindex_self
@[to_additive]
theorem index_ker {H} [Group H] (f : G →* H) : f.ker.index = Nat.card (Set.range f) := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comap_bot, index_comap, relindex_bot_left]
rfl
#align subgroup.index_ker Subgroup.index_ker
#align add_subgroup.index_ker AddSubgroup.index_ker
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_ker {H} [Group H] (f : G →* H) (K : Subgroup G) :
f.ker.relindex K = Nat.card (f '' K) := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comap_bot, relindex_comap, relindex_bot_left]
rfl
#align subgroup.relindex_ker Subgroup.relindex_ker
#align add_subgroup.relindex_ker AddSubgroup.relindex_ker
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_mul_index]
theorem card_mul_index : Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G := by
rw [← relindex_bot_left, ← index_bot]
exact relindex_mul_index bot_le
#align subgroup.card_mul_index Subgroup.card_mul_index
#align add_subgroup.card_mul_index AddSubgroup.card_mul_index
@[to_additive]
theorem nat_card_dvd_of_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] (f : G →* H)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : Nat.card G ∣ Nat.card H := by
rw [Nat.card_congr (MonoidHom.ofInjective hf).toEquiv]
exact Dvd.intro f.range.index f.range.card_mul_index
#align subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_injective Subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_injective
#align add_subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_injective AddSubgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem nat_card_dvd_of_le (hHK : H ≤ K) : Nat.card H ∣ Nat.card K :=
nat_card_dvd_of_injective (inclusion hHK) (inclusion_injective hHK)
#align subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_le Subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_le
#align add_subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_le AddSubgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem nat_card_dvd_of_surjective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] (f : G →* H)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : Nat.card H ∣ Nat.card G := by
rw [← Nat.card_congr (QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f hf).toEquiv]
exact Dvd.intro_left (Nat.card f.ker) f.ker.card_mul_index
#align subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_surjective Subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_surjective AddSubgroup.nat_card_dvd_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem card_dvd_of_surjective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] [Fintype G] [Fintype H]
(f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Fintype.card H ∣ Fintype.card G := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, nat_card_dvd_of_surjective f hf]
#align subgroup.card_dvd_of_surjective Subgroup.card_dvd_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.card_dvd_of_surjective AddSubgroup.card_dvd_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map {G' : Type*} [Group G'] (f : G →* G') :
(H.map f).index = (H ⊔ f.ker).index * f.range.index := by
rw [← comap_map_eq, index_comap, relindex_mul_index (H.map_le_range f)]
#align subgroup.index_map Subgroup.index_map
#align add_subgroup.index_map AddSubgroup.index_map
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map_dvd {G' : Type*} [Group G'] {f : G →* G'} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).index ∣ H.index := by
rw [index_map, f.range_top_of_surjective hf, index_top, mul_one]
exact index_dvd_of_le le_sup_left
#align subgroup.index_map_dvd Subgroup.index_map_dvd
#align add_subgroup.index_map_dvd AddSubgroup.index_map_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem dvd_index_map {G' : Type*} [Group G'] {f : G →* G'} (hf : f.ker ≤ H) :
H.index ∣ (H.map f).index := by
rw [index_map, sup_of_le_left hf]
apply dvd_mul_right
#align subgroup.dvd_index_map Subgroup.dvd_index_map
#align add_subgroup.dvd_index_map AddSubgroup.dvd_index_map
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map_eq {G' : Type*} [Group G'] {f : G →* G'} (hf1 : Function.Surjective f)
(hf2 : f.ker ≤ H) : (H.map f).index = H.index :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (H.index_map_dvd hf1) (H.dvd_index_map hf2)
#align subgroup.index_map_eq Subgroup.index_map_eq
#align add_subgroup.index_map_eq AddSubgroup.index_map_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem index_eq_card [Fintype (G ⧸ H)] : H.index = Fintype.card (G ⧸ H) :=
Nat.card_eq_fintype_card
#align subgroup.index_eq_card Subgroup.index_eq_card
#align add_subgroup.index_eq_card AddSubgroup.index_eq_card
@[to_additive index_mul_card]
theorem index_mul_card [Fintype G] [hH : Fintype H] :
H.index * Fintype.card H = Fintype.card G := by
rw [← relindex_bot_left_eq_card, ← index_bot_eq_card, mul_comm];
exact relindex_mul_index bot_le
#align subgroup.index_mul_card Subgroup.index_mul_card
#align add_subgroup.index_mul_card AddSubgroup.index_mul_card
@[to_additive]
theorem index_dvd_card [Fintype G] : H.index ∣ Fintype.card G := by
classical exact ⟨Fintype.card H, H.index_mul_card.symm⟩
#align subgroup.index_dvd_card Subgroup.index_dvd_card
#align add_subgroup.index_dvd_card AddSubgroup.index_dvd_card
variable {H K L}
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K.relindex L = 0) : H.relindex L = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (hKL ▸ relindex_dvd_of_le_left L hHK)
#align subgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left Subgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left
#align add_subgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left AddSubgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right (hKL : K ≤ L) (hHK : H.relindex K = 0) : H.relindex L = 0 :=
Finite.card_eq_zero_of_embedding (quotientSubgroupOfEmbeddingOfLE H hKL) hHK
#align subgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right Subgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right
#align add_subgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right AddSubgroup.relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right
@[to_additive]
theorem index_eq_zero_of_relindex_eq_zero (h : H.relindex K = 0) : H.index = 0 :=
H.relindex_top_right.symm.trans (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right le_top h)
#align subgroup.index_eq_zero_of_relindex_eq_zero Subgroup.index_eq_zero_of_relindex_eq_zero
#align add_subgroup.index_eq_zero_of_relindex_eq_zero AddSubgroup.index_eq_zero_of_relindex_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_le_of_le_left (hHK : H ≤ K) (hHL : H.relindex L ≠ 0) :
K.relindex L ≤ H.relindex L :=
Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hHL) (relindex_dvd_of_le_left L hHK)
#align subgroup.relindex_le_of_le_left Subgroup.relindex_le_of_le_left
#align add_subgroup.relindex_le_of_le_left AddSubgroup.relindex_le_of_le_left
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_le_of_le_right (hKL : K ≤ L) (hHL : H.relindex L ≠ 0) :
H.relindex K ≤ H.relindex L :=
Finite.card_le_of_embedding' (quotientSubgroupOfEmbeddingOfLE H hKL) fun h => (hHL h).elim
#align subgroup.relindex_le_of_le_right Subgroup.relindex_le_of_le_right
#align add_subgroup.relindex_le_of_le_right AddSubgroup.relindex_le_of_le_right
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_ne_zero_trans (hHK : H.relindex K ≠ 0) (hKL : K.relindex L ≠ 0) :
H.relindex L ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mul_ne_zero (mt (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right (show K ⊓ L ≤ K from inf_le_left)) hHK) hKL
((relindex_inf_mul_relindex H K L).trans (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left inf_le_left h))
#align subgroup.relindex_ne_zero_trans Subgroup.relindex_ne_zero_trans
#align add_subgroup.relindex_ne_zero_trans AddSubgroup.relindex_ne_zero_trans
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_inf_ne_zero (hH : H.relindex L ≠ 0) (hK : K.relindex L ≠ 0) :
(H ⊓ K).relindex L ≠ 0 := by
replace hH : H.relindex (K ⊓ L) ≠ 0 := mt (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right inf_le_right) hH
rw [← inf_relindex_right] at hH hK ⊢
rw [inf_assoc]
exact relindex_ne_zero_trans hH hK
#align subgroup.relindex_inf_ne_zero Subgroup.relindex_inf_ne_zero
#align add_subgroup.relindex_inf_ne_zero AddSubgroup.relindex_inf_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem index_inf_ne_zero (hH : H.index ≠ 0) (hK : K.index ≠ 0) : (H ⊓ K).index ≠ 0 := by
rw [← relindex_top_right] at hH hK ⊢
exact relindex_inf_ne_zero hH hK
#align subgroup.index_inf_ne_zero Subgroup.index_inf_ne_zero
#align add_subgroup.index_inf_ne_zero AddSubgroup.index_inf_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Index.lean | 435 | 440 | theorem relindex_inf_le : (H ⊓ K).relindex L ≤ H.relindex L * K.relindex L := by |
by_cases h : H.relindex L = 0
· exact (le_of_eq (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left inf_le_left h)).trans (zero_le _)
rw [← inf_relindex_right, inf_assoc, ← relindex_mul_relindex _ _ L inf_le_right inf_le_right,
inf_relindex_right, inf_relindex_right]
exact mul_le_mul_right' (relindex_le_of_le_right inf_le_right h) (K.relindex L)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
#align simple_graph.edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
#align simple_graph.coe_edge_finset SimpleGraph.coe_edgeFinset
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align simple_graph.mem_edge_finset SimpleGraph.mem_edgeFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
#align simple_graph.not_is_diag_of_mem_edge_finset SimpleGraph.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_inj SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_inj
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_subset_edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_ssubset_edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_mono SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_strict_mono SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_strict_mono
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_bot SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_bot
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_sup SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_sup
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_inf SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_inf
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_sdiff SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_sdiff
theorem edgeFinset_card : G.edgeFinset.card = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_card SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : (univ : Finset G.edgeSet).card = G.edgeFinset.card :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_set_univ_card SimpleGraph.edgeSet_univ_card
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = univ.filter fun e => ¬e.IsDiag := by
rw [← coe_inj]; simp
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset.card = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
/-- Any graph on `n` vertices has at most `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_le_card_choose_two : G.edgeFinset.card ≤ (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
classical
rw [← card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two]
exact card_le_card (edgeFinset_mono le_top)
end EdgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_deleteEdges [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] (s : Finset (Sym2 V))
[Fintype (G.deleteEdges s).edgeSet] :
(G.deleteEdges s).edgeFinset = G.edgeFinset \ s := by
ext e
simp [edgeSet_deleteEdges]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_delete_edges SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_deleteEdges
section DeleteFar
-- Porting note: added `Fintype (Sym2 V)` argument.
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [OrderedRing 𝕜] [Fintype V] [Fintype (Sym2 V)]
[Fintype G.edgeSet] {p : SimpleGraph V → Prop} {r r₁ r₂ : 𝕜}
/-- A graph is `r`-*delete-far* from a property `p` if we must delete at least `r` edges from it to
get a graph with the property `p`. -/
def DeleteFar (p : SimpleGraph V → Prop) (r : 𝕜) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃s⦄, s ⊆ G.edgeFinset → p (G.deleteEdges s) → r ≤ s.card
#align simple_graph.delete_far SimpleGraph.DeleteFar
variable {G}
theorem deleteFar_iff :
G.DeleteFar p r ↔ ∀ ⦃H : SimpleGraph _⦄ [DecidableRel H.Adj],
H ≤ G → p H → r ≤ G.edgeFinset.card - H.edgeFinset.card := by
classical
refine ⟨fun h H _ hHG hH ↦ ?_, fun h s hs hG ↦ ?_⟩
· have := h (sdiff_subset (t := H.edgeFinset))
simp only [deleteEdges_sdiff_eq_of_le hHG, edgeFinset_mono hHG, card_sdiff,
card_le_card, coe_sdiff, coe_edgeFinset, Nat.cast_sub] at this
exact this hH
· classical
simpa [card_sdiff hs, edgeFinset_deleteEdges, -Set.toFinset_card, Nat.cast_sub,
card_le_card hs] using h (G.deleteEdges_le s) hG
#align simple_graph.delete_far_iff SimpleGraph.deleteFar_iff
alias ⟨DeleteFar.le_card_sub_card, _⟩ := deleteFar_iff
#align simple_graph.delete_far.le_card_sub_card SimpleGraph.DeleteFar.le_card_sub_card
theorem DeleteFar.mono (h : G.DeleteFar p r₂) (hr : r₁ ≤ r₂) : G.DeleteFar p r₁ := fun _ hs hG =>
hr.trans <| h hs hG
#align simple_graph.delete_far.mono SimpleGraph.DeleteFar.mono
end DeleteFar
section FiniteAt
/-!
## Finiteness at a vertex
This section contains definitions and lemmas concerning vertices that
have finitely many adjacent vertices. We denote this condition by
`Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
We define `G.neighborFinset v` to be the `Finset` version of `G.neighborSet v`.
Use `neighborFinset_eq_filter` to rewrite this definition as a `Finset.filter` expression.
-/
variable (v) [Fintype (G.neighborSet v)]
/-- `G.neighbors v` is the `Finset` version of `G.Adj v` in case `G` is
locally finite at `v`. -/
def neighborFinset : Finset V :=
(G.neighborSet v).toFinset
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset SimpleGraph.neighborFinset
theorem neighborFinset_def : G.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborSet v).toFinset :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_def SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborFinset (w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborFinset v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align simple_graph.mem_neighbor_finset SimpleGraph.mem_neighborFinset
theorem not_mem_neighborFinset_self : v ∉ G.neighborFinset v := by simp
#align simple_graph.not_mem_neighbor_finset_self SimpleGraph.not_mem_neighborFinset_self
theorem neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton : Disjoint (G.neighborFinset v) {v} :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_disjoint_singleton SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton
theorem singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset : Disjoint {v} (G.neighborFinset v) :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
#align simple_graph.singleton_disjoint_neighbor_finset SimpleGraph.singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset
/-- `G.degree v` is the number of vertices adjacent to `v`. -/
def degree : ℕ :=
(G.neighborFinset v).card
#align simple_graph.degree SimpleGraph.degree
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 we could do `simp [← degree]`, but that gives
-- "invalid '←' modifier, 'SimpleGraph.degree' is a declaration name to be unfolded".
-- In any case, having this lemma is good since there's no guarantee we won't still change
-- the definition of `degree`.
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborFinset_eq_degree : (G.neighborFinset v).card = G.degree v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborSet_eq_degree : Fintype.card (G.neighborSet v) = G.degree v :=
(Set.toFinset_card _).symm
#align simple_graph.card_neighbor_set_eq_degree SimpleGraph.card_neighborSet_eq_degree
theorem degree_pos_iff_exists_adj : 0 < G.degree v ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w := by
simp only [degree, card_pos, Finset.Nonempty, mem_neighborFinset]
#align simple_graph.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj SimpleGraph.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj
theorem degree_compl [Fintype (Gᶜ.neighborSet v)] [Fintype V] :
Gᶜ.degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 - G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet G v, Set.toFinset_union]
simp [card_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_toFinset.mpr (compl_neighborSet_disjoint G v))]
#align simple_graph.degree_compl SimpleGraph.degree_compl
instance incidenceSetFintype [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (G.incidenceSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (G.neighborSet v) (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v).symm
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_fintype SimpleGraph.incidenceSetFintype
/-- This is the `Finset` version of `incidenceSet`. -/
def incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
(G.incidenceSet v).toFinset
#align simple_graph.incidence_finset SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceSet_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
Fintype.card (G.incidenceSet v) = G.degree v := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v)]
simp
#align simple_graph.card_incidence_set_eq_degree SimpleGraph.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
(G.incidenceFinset v).card = G.degree v := by
rw [← G.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree]
apply Set.toFinset_card
#align simple_graph.card_incidence_finset_eq_degree SimpleGraph.card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) :
e ∈ G.incidenceFinset v ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet v :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align simple_graph.mem_incidence_finset SimpleGraph.mem_incidenceFinset
theorem incidenceFinset_eq_filter [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] :
G.incidenceFinset v = G.edgeFinset.filter (Membership.mem v) := by
ext e
refine Sym2.ind (fun x y => ?_) e
simp [mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff]
#align simple_graph.incidence_finset_eq_filter SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset_eq_filter
end FiniteAt
section LocallyFinite
/-- A graph is locally finite if every vertex has a finite neighbor set. -/
abbrev LocallyFinite :=
∀ v : V, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)
#align simple_graph.locally_finite SimpleGraph.LocallyFinite
variable [LocallyFinite G]
/-- A locally finite simple graph is regular of degree `d` if every vertex has degree `d`. -/
def IsRegularOfDegree (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, G.degree v = d
#align simple_graph.is_regular_of_degree SimpleGraph.IsRegularOfDegree
variable {G}
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq {d : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) (v : V) : G.degree v = d :=
h v
#align simple_graph.is_regular_of_degree.degree_eq SimpleGraph.IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.compl [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{k : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree k) : Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1 - k) := by
intro v
rw [degree_compl, h v]
#align simple_graph.is_regular_of_degree.compl SimpleGraph.IsRegularOfDegree.compl
end LocallyFinite
section Finite
variable [Fintype V]
instance neighborSetFintype [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : Fintype (G.neighborSet v) :=
@Subtype.fintype _ _
(by
simp_rw [mem_neighborSet]
infer_instance)
_
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set_fintype SimpleGraph.neighborSetFintype
theorem neighborFinset_eq_filter {v : V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
G.neighborFinset v = Finset.univ.filter (G.Adj v) := by
ext
simp
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_eq_filter SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_eq_filter
theorem neighborFinset_compl [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
Gᶜ.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} := by
simp only [neighborFinset, neighborSet_compl, Set.toFinset_diff, Set.toFinset_compl,
Set.toFinset_singleton]
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_compl SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_compl
@[simp]
theorem complete_graph_degree [DecidableEq V] (v : V) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 := by
erw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, filter_ne, card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ v), card_univ]
#align simple_graph.complete_graph_degree SimpleGraph.complete_graph_degree
theorem bot_degree (v : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = 0 := by
erw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, filter_False]
exact Finset.card_empty
#align simple_graph.bot_degree SimpleGraph.bot_degree
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1) := by
intro v
simp
#align simple_graph.is_regular_of_degree.top SimpleGraph.IsRegularOfDegree.top
/-- The minimum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_minimal_degree_vertex`, `minDegree_le_degree`
and `le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree`. -/
def minDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
WithTop.untop' 0 (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).min
#align simple_graph.min_degree SimpleGraph.minDegree
/-- There exists a vertex of minimal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_minimal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.minDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := min_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
obtain ⟨v, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp (mem_of_min ht)
exact ⟨v, by simp [minDegree, ht]⟩
#align simple_graph.exists_minimal_degree_vertex SimpleGraph.exists_minimal_degree_vertex
/-- The minimum degree in the graph is at most the degree of any particular vertex. -/
theorem minDegree_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.minDegree ≤ G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := Finset.min_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.min_le_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [minDegree, ht]
#align simple_graph.min_degree_le_degree SimpleGraph.minDegree_le_degree
/-- In a nonempty graph, if `k` is at most the degree of every vertex, it is at most the minimum
degree. Note the assumption that the graph is nonempty is necessary as long as `G.minDegree` is
defined to be a natural. -/
theorem le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] (k : ℕ)
(h : ∀ v, k ≤ G.degree v) : k ≤ G.minDegree := by
rcases G.exists_minimal_degree_vertex with ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [hv]
apply h
#align simple_graph.le_min_degree_of_forall_le_degree SimpleGraph.le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree
/-- The maximum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_maximal_degree_vertex`, `degree_le_maxDegree`
and `maxDegree_le_of_forall_degree_le`. -/
def maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
Option.getD (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).max 0
#align simple_graph.max_degree SimpleGraph.maxDegree
/-- There exists a vertex of maximal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_maximal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.maxDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := max_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
have ht₂ := mem_of_max ht
simp only [mem_image, mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true] at ht₂
rcases ht₂ with ⟨v, _, rfl⟩
refine ⟨v, ?_⟩
rw [maxDegree, ht]
rfl
#align simple_graph.exists_maximal_degree_vertex SimpleGraph.exists_maximal_degree_vertex
/-- The maximum degree in the graph is at least the degree of any particular vertex. -/
theorem degree_le_maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.degree v ≤ G.maxDegree := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := Finset.max_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.le_max_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [maxDegree, ht]
#align simple_graph.degree_le_max_degree SimpleGraph.degree_le_maxDegree
/-- In a graph, if `k` is at least the degree of every vertex, then it is at least the maximum
degree. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 419 | 428 | theorem maxDegree_le_of_forall_degree_le [DecidableRel G.Adj] (k : ℕ) (h : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ k) :
G.maxDegree ≤ k := by |
by_cases hV : (univ : Finset V).Nonempty
· haveI : Nonempty V := univ_nonempty_iff.mp hV
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := G.exists_maximal_degree_vertex
rw [hv]
apply h
· rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hV
rw [maxDegree, hV, image_empty]
exact k.zero_le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Mathport.Rename
import Mathlib.Init.Algebra.Classes
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Ordering.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
import Mathlib.Tactic.TypeStar
import Batteries.Classes.Order
#align_import init.algebra.order from "leanprover-community/lean"@"c2bcdbcbe741ed37c361a30d38e179182b989f76"
/-!
# Orders
Defines classes for preorders, partial orders, and linear orders
and proves some basic lemmas about them.
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
section Preorder
/-!
### Definition of `Preorder` and lemmas about types with a `Preorder`
-/
/-- A preorder is a reflexive, transitive relation `≤` with `a < b` defined in the obvious way. -/
class Preorder (α : Type u) extends LE α, LT α where
le_refl : ∀ a : α, a ≤ a
le_trans : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ b → b ≤ c → a ≤ c
lt := fun a b => a ≤ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a
lt_iff_le_not_le : ∀ a b : α, a < b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a := by intros; rfl
#align preorder Preorder
#align preorder.to_has_le Preorder.toLE
#align preorder.to_has_lt Preorder.toLT
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The relation `≤` on a preorder is reflexive. -/
@[refl]
theorem le_refl : ∀ a : α, a ≤ a :=
Preorder.le_refl
#align le_refl le_refl
/-- A version of `le_refl` where the argument is implicit -/
theorem le_rfl {a : α} : a ≤ a :=
le_refl a
#align le_rfl le_rfl
/-- The relation `≤` on a preorder is transitive. -/
@[trans]
theorem le_trans : ∀ {a b c : α}, a ≤ b → b ≤ c → a ≤ c :=
Preorder.le_trans _ _ _
#align le_trans le_trans
theorem lt_iff_le_not_le : ∀ {a b : α}, a < b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a :=
Preorder.lt_iff_le_not_le _ _
#align lt_iff_le_not_le lt_iff_le_not_le
theorem lt_of_le_not_le : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → ¬b ≤ a → a < b
| _a, _b, hab, hba => lt_iff_le_not_le.mpr ⟨hab, hba⟩
#align lt_of_le_not_le lt_of_le_not_le
theorem le_not_le_of_lt : ∀ {a b : α}, a < b → a ≤ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a
| _a, _b, hab => lt_iff_le_not_le.mp hab
#align le_not_le_of_lt le_not_le_of_lt
theorem le_of_eq {a b : α} : a = b → a ≤ b := fun h => h ▸ le_refl a
#align le_of_eq le_of_eq
@[trans]
theorem ge_trans : ∀ {a b c : α}, a ≥ b → b ≥ c → a ≥ c := fun h₁ h₂ => le_trans h₂ h₁
#align ge_trans ge_trans
theorem lt_irrefl : ∀ a : α, ¬a < a
| _a, haa =>
match le_not_le_of_lt haa with
| ⟨h1, h2⟩ => h2 h1
#align lt_irrefl lt_irrefl
theorem gt_irrefl : ∀ a : α, ¬a > a :=
lt_irrefl
#align gt_irrefl gt_irrefl
@[trans]
theorem lt_trans : ∀ {a b c : α}, a < b → b < c → a < c
| _a, _b, _c, hab, hbc =>
match le_not_le_of_lt hab, le_not_le_of_lt hbc with
| ⟨hab, _hba⟩, ⟨hbc, hcb⟩ =>
lt_of_le_not_le (le_trans hab hbc) fun hca => hcb (le_trans hca hab)
#align lt_trans lt_trans
@[trans]
theorem gt_trans : ∀ {a b c : α}, a > b → b > c → a > c := fun h₁ h₂ => lt_trans h₂ h₁
#align gt_trans gt_trans
theorem ne_of_lt {a b : α} (h : a < b) : a ≠ b := fun he => absurd h (he ▸ lt_irrefl a)
#align ne_of_lt ne_of_lt
theorem ne_of_gt {a b : α} (h : b < a) : a ≠ b := fun he => absurd h (he ▸ lt_irrefl a)
#align ne_of_gt ne_of_gt
theorem lt_asymm {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ¬b < a := fun h1 : b < a => lt_irrefl a (lt_trans h h1)
#align lt_asymm lt_asymm
theorem le_of_lt : ∀ {a b : α}, a < b → a ≤ b
| _a, _b, hab => (le_not_le_of_lt hab).left
#align le_of_lt le_of_lt
@[trans]
theorem lt_of_lt_of_le : ∀ {a b c : α}, a < b → b ≤ c → a < c
| _a, _b, _c, hab, hbc =>
let ⟨hab, hba⟩ := le_not_le_of_lt hab
lt_of_le_not_le (le_trans hab hbc) fun hca => hba (le_trans hbc hca)
#align lt_of_lt_of_le lt_of_lt_of_le
@[trans]
theorem lt_of_le_of_lt : ∀ {a b c : α}, a ≤ b → b < c → a < c
| _a, _b, _c, hab, hbc =>
let ⟨hbc, hcb⟩ := le_not_le_of_lt hbc
lt_of_le_not_le (le_trans hab hbc) fun hca => hcb (le_trans hca hab)
#align lt_of_le_of_lt lt_of_le_of_lt
@[trans]
theorem gt_of_gt_of_ge {a b c : α} (h₁ : a > b) (h₂ : b ≥ c) : a > c :=
lt_of_le_of_lt h₂ h₁
#align gt_of_gt_of_ge gt_of_gt_of_ge
@[trans]
theorem gt_of_ge_of_gt {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≥ b) (h₂ : b > c) : a > c :=
lt_of_lt_of_le h₂ h₁
#align gt_of_ge_of_gt gt_of_ge_of_gt
-- Porting note (#10754): new instance
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α LE.le LE.le LE.le := ⟨le_trans⟩
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α LT.lt LT.lt LT.lt := ⟨lt_trans⟩
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α LT.lt LE.le LT.lt := ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le⟩
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α LE.le LT.lt LT.lt := ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt⟩
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α GE.ge GE.ge GE.ge := ⟨ge_trans⟩
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α GT.gt GT.gt GT.gt := ⟨gt_trans⟩
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α GT.gt GE.ge GT.gt := ⟨gt_of_gt_of_ge⟩
instance (priority := 900) : @Trans α α α GE.ge GT.gt GT.gt := ⟨gt_of_ge_of_gt⟩
theorem not_le_of_gt {a b : α} (h : a > b) : ¬a ≤ b :=
(le_not_le_of_lt h).right
#align not_le_of_gt not_le_of_gt
theorem not_lt_of_ge {a b : α} (h : a ≥ b) : ¬a < b := fun hab => not_le_of_gt hab h
#align not_lt_of_ge not_lt_of_ge
theorem le_of_lt_or_eq : ∀ {a b : α}, a < b ∨ a = b → a ≤ b
| _a, _b, Or.inl hab => le_of_lt hab
| _a, _b, Or.inr hab => hab ▸ le_refl _
#align le_of_lt_or_eq le_of_lt_or_eq
theorem le_of_eq_or_lt {a b : α} (h : a = b ∨ a < b) : a ≤ b :=
Or.elim h le_of_eq le_of_lt
#align le_of_eq_or_lt le_of_eq_or_lt
/-- `<` is decidable if `≤` is. -/
def decidableLTOfDecidableLE [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] : @DecidableRel α (· < ·)
| a, b =>
if hab : a ≤ b then
if hba : b ≤ a then isFalse fun hab' => not_le_of_gt hab' hba
else isTrue <| lt_of_le_not_le hab hba
else isFalse fun hab' => hab (le_of_lt hab')
#align decidable_lt_of_decidable_le decidableLTOfDecidableLE
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
/-!
### Definition of `PartialOrder` and lemmas about types with a partial order
-/
/-- A partial order is a reflexive, transitive, antisymmetric relation `≤`. -/
class PartialOrder (α : Type u) extends Preorder α where
le_antisymm : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → b ≤ a → a = b
#align partial_order PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
theorem le_antisymm : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → b ≤ a → a = b :=
PartialOrder.le_antisymm _ _
#align le_antisymm le_antisymm
alias eq_of_le_of_le := le_antisymm
theorem le_antisymm_iff {a b : α} : a = b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨le_of_eq e, le_of_eq e.symm⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => le_antisymm h1 h2⟩
#align le_antisymm_iff le_antisymm_iff
theorem lt_of_le_of_ne {a b : α} : a ≤ b → a ≠ b → a < b := fun h₁ h₂ =>
lt_of_le_not_le h₁ <| mt (le_antisymm h₁) h₂
#align lt_of_le_of_ne lt_of_le_of_ne
/-- Equality is decidable if `≤` is. -/
def decidableEqOfDecidableLE [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] : DecidableEq α
| a, b =>
if hab : a ≤ b then
if hba : b ≤ a then isTrue (le_antisymm hab hba) else isFalse fun heq => hba (heq ▸ le_refl _)
else isFalse fun heq => hab (heq ▸ le_refl _)
#align decidable_eq_of_decidable_le decidableEqOfDecidableLE
namespace Decidable
variable [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)]
theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) : a < b ∨ a = b :=
if hba : b ≤ a then Or.inr (le_antisymm hab hba) else Or.inl (lt_of_le_not_le hab hba)
#align decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le Decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le
theorem eq_or_lt_of_le {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) : a = b ∨ a < b :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le hab).symm
#align decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le
theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq {a b : α} : a ≤ b ↔ a < b ∨ a = b :=
⟨lt_or_eq_of_le, le_of_lt_or_eq⟩
#align decidable.le_iff_lt_or_eq Decidable.le_iff_lt_or_eq
end Decidable
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable
theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {a b : α} : a ≤ b → a < b ∨ a = b :=
Decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le
#align lt_or_eq_of_le lt_or_eq_of_le
theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq {a b : α} : a ≤ b ↔ a < b ∨ a = b :=
Decidable.le_iff_lt_or_eq
#align le_iff_lt_or_eq le_iff_lt_or_eq
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
/-!
### Definition of `LinearOrder` and lemmas about types with a linear order
-/
/-- Default definition of `max`. -/
def maxDefault {α : Type u} [LE α] [DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop)] (a b : α) :=
if a ≤ b then b else a
#align max_default maxDefault
/-- Default definition of `min`. -/
def minDefault {α : Type u} [LE α] [DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop)] (a b : α) :=
if a ≤ b then a else b
/-- This attempts to prove that a given instance of `compare` is equal to `compareOfLessAndEq` by
introducing the arguments and trying the following approaches in order:
1. seeing if `rfl` works
2. seeing if the `compare` at hand is nonetheless essentially `compareOfLessAndEq`, but, because of
implicit arguments, requires us to unfold the defs and split the `if`s in the definition of
`compareOfLessAndEq`
3. seeing if we can split by cases on the arguments, then see if the defs work themselves out
(useful when `compare` is defined via a `match` statement, as it is for `Bool`) -/
macro "compareOfLessAndEq_rfl" : tactic =>
`(tactic| (intros a b; first | rfl |
(simp only [compare, compareOfLessAndEq]; split_ifs <;> rfl) |
(induction a <;> induction b <;> simp (config := {decide := true}) only [])))
/-- A linear order is reflexive, transitive, antisymmetric and total relation `≤`.
We assume that every linear ordered type has decidable `(≤)`, `(<)`, and `(=)`. -/
class LinearOrder (α : Type u) extends PartialOrder α, Min α, Max α, Ord α :=
/-- A linear order is total. -/
le_total (a b : α) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLE : DecidableRel (· ≤ · : α → α → Prop)
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableEq : DecidableEq α := @decidableEqOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLT : DecidableRel (· < · : α → α → Prop) :=
@decidableLTOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
min := fun a b => if a ≤ b then a else b
max := fun a b => if a ≤ b then b else a
/-- The minimum function is equivalent to the one you get from `minOfLe`. -/
min_def : ∀ a b, min a b = if a ≤ b then a else b := by intros; rfl
/-- The minimum function is equivalent to the one you get from `maxOfLe`. -/
max_def : ∀ a b, max a b = if a ≤ b then b else a := by intros; rfl
compare a b := compareOfLessAndEq a b
/-- Comparison via `compare` is equal to the canonical comparison given decidable `<` and `=`. -/
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq : ∀ a b, compare a b = compareOfLessAndEq a b := by
compareOfLessAndEq_rfl
#align linear_order LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
attribute [local instance] LinearOrder.decidableLE
theorem le_total : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a :=
LinearOrder.le_total
#align le_total le_total
theorem le_of_not_ge {a b : α} : ¬a ≥ b → a ≤ b :=
Or.resolve_left (le_total b a)
#align le_of_not_ge le_of_not_ge
theorem le_of_not_le {a b : α} : ¬a ≤ b → b ≤ a :=
Or.resolve_left (le_total a b)
#align le_of_not_le le_of_not_le
theorem not_lt_of_gt {a b : α} (h : a > b) : ¬a < b :=
lt_asymm h
#align not_lt_of_gt not_lt_of_gt
theorem lt_trichotomy (a b : α) : a < b ∨ a = b ∨ b < a :=
Or.elim (le_total a b)
(fun h : a ≤ b =>
Or.elim (Decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le h) (fun h : a < b => Or.inl h) fun h : a = b =>
Or.inr (Or.inl h))
fun h : b ≤ a =>
Or.elim (Decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le h) (fun h : b < a => Or.inr (Or.inr h)) fun h : b = a =>
Or.inr (Or.inl h.symm)
#align lt_trichotomy lt_trichotomy
theorem le_of_not_lt {a b : α} (h : ¬b < a) : a ≤ b :=
match lt_trichotomy a b with
| Or.inl hlt => le_of_lt hlt
| Or.inr (Or.inl HEq) => HEq ▸ le_refl a
| Or.inr (Or.inr hgt) => absurd hgt h
#align le_of_not_lt le_of_not_lt
theorem le_of_not_gt {a b : α} : ¬a > b → a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_lt
#align le_of_not_gt le_of_not_gt
theorem lt_of_not_ge {a b : α} (h : ¬a ≥ b) : a < b :=
lt_of_le_not_le ((le_total _ _).resolve_right h) h
#align lt_of_not_ge lt_of_not_ge
theorem lt_or_le (a b : α) : a < b ∨ b ≤ a :=
if hba : b ≤ a then Or.inr hba else Or.inl <| lt_of_not_ge hba
#align lt_or_le lt_or_le
theorem le_or_lt (a b : α) : a ≤ b ∨ b < a :=
(lt_or_le b a).symm
#align le_or_lt le_or_lt
theorem lt_or_ge : ∀ a b : α, a < b ∨ a ≥ b :=
lt_or_le
#align lt_or_ge lt_or_ge
theorem le_or_gt : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b ∨ a > b :=
le_or_lt
#align le_or_gt le_or_gt
theorem lt_or_gt_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : a < b ∨ a > b :=
match lt_trichotomy a b with
| Or.inl hlt => Or.inl hlt
| Or.inr (Or.inl HEq) => absurd HEq h
| Or.inr (Or.inr hgt) => Or.inr hgt
#align lt_or_gt_of_ne lt_or_gt_of_ne
theorem ne_iff_lt_or_gt {a b : α} : a ≠ b ↔ a < b ∨ a > b :=
⟨lt_or_gt_of_ne, fun o => Or.elim o ne_of_lt ne_of_gt⟩
#align ne_iff_lt_or_gt ne_iff_lt_or_gt
theorem lt_iff_not_ge (x y : α) : x < y ↔ ¬x ≥ y :=
⟨not_le_of_gt, lt_of_not_ge⟩
#align lt_iff_not_ge lt_iff_not_ge
@[simp]
theorem not_lt {a b : α} : ¬a < b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_not_gt, not_lt_of_ge⟩
#align not_lt not_lt
@[simp]
theorem not_le {a b : α} : ¬a ≤ b ↔ b < a :=
(lt_iff_not_ge _ _).symm
#align not_le not_le
instance (priority := 900) (a b : α) : Decidable (a < b) :=
LinearOrder.decidableLT a b
instance (priority := 900) (a b : α) : Decidable (a ≤ b) :=
LinearOrder.decidableLE a b
instance (priority := 900) (a b : α) : Decidable (a = b) :=
LinearOrder.decidableEq a b
theorem eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : α} (h : ¬a < b) : a = b ∨ b < a :=
if h₁ : a = b then Or.inl h₁ else Or.inr (lt_of_not_ge fun hge => h (lt_of_le_of_ne hge h₁))
#align eq_or_lt_of_not_lt eq_or_lt_of_not_lt
instance : IsTotalPreorder α (· ≤ ·) where
trans := @le_trans _ _
total := le_total
-- TODO(Leo): decide whether we should keep this instance or not
instance isStrictWeakOrder_of_linearOrder : IsStrictWeakOrder α (· < ·) :=
have : IsTotalPreorder α (· ≤ ·) := by infer_instance -- Porting note: added
isStrictWeakOrder_of_isTotalPreorder lt_iff_not_ge
#align is_strict_weak_order_of_linear_order isStrictWeakOrder_of_linearOrder
-- TODO(Leo): decide whether we should keep this instance or not
instance isStrictTotalOrder_of_linearOrder : IsStrictTotalOrder α (· < ·) where
trichotomous := lt_trichotomy
#align is_strict_total_order_of_linear_order isStrictTotalOrder_of_linearOrder
/-- Perform a case-split on the ordering of `x` and `y` in a decidable linear order. -/
def ltByCases (x y : α) {P : Sort*} (h₁ : x < y → P) (h₂ : x = y → P) (h₃ : y < x → P) : P :=
if h : x < y then h₁ h
else if h' : y < x then h₃ h' else h₂ (le_antisymm (le_of_not_gt h') (le_of_not_gt h))
#align lt_by_cases ltByCases
theorem le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt {β} [Preorder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : d < c → b < a) (h : a ≤ b) : c ≤ d :=
le_of_not_lt fun h' => not_le_of_gt (H h') h
#align le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt
-- Porting note: new
section Ord
theorem compare_lt_iff_lt {a b : α} : (compare a b = .lt) ↔ a < b := by
rw [LinearOrder.compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq, compareOfLessAndEq]
split_ifs <;> simp only [*, lt_irrefl]
theorem compare_gt_iff_gt {a b : α} : (compare a b = .gt) ↔ a > b := by
rw [LinearOrder.compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq, compareOfLessAndEq]
split_ifs <;> simp only [*, lt_irrefl, not_lt_of_gt]
case _ h₁ h₂ =>
have h : b < a := lt_trichotomy a b |>.resolve_left h₁ |>.resolve_left h₂
exact true_iff_iff.2 h
| Mathlib/Init/Order/Defs.lean | 432 | 437 | theorem compare_eq_iff_eq {a b : α} : (compare a b = .eq) ↔ a = b := by |
rw [LinearOrder.compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq, compareOfLessAndEq]
split_ifs <;> try simp only
case _ h => exact false_iff_iff.2 <| ne_iff_lt_or_gt.2 <| .inl h
case _ _ h => exact true_iff_iff.2 h
case _ _ h => exact false_iff_iff.2 h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang, Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
#align_import algebra.module.localized_module from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
/-!
# Localized Module
Given a commutative semiring `R`, a multiplicative subset `S ⊆ R` and an `R`-module `M`, we can
localize `M` by `S`. This gives us a `Localization S`-module.
## Main definitions
* `LocalizedModule.r` : the equivalence relation defining this localization, namely
`(m, s) ≈ (m', s')` if and only if there is some `u : S` such that `u • s' • m = u • s • m'`.
* `LocalizedModule M S` : the localized module by `S`.
* `LocalizedModule.mk` : the canonical map sending `(m, s) : M × S ↦ m/s : LocalizedModule M S`
* `LocalizedModule.liftOn` : any well defined function `f : M × S → α` respecting `r` descents to
a function `LocalizedModule M S → α`
* `LocalizedModule.liftOn₂` : any well defined function `f : M × S → M × S → α` respecting `r`
descents to a function `LocalizedModule M S → LocalizedModule M S`
* `LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk` : in the localized module
`mk m s + mk m' s' = mk (s' • m + s • m') (s * s')`
* `LocalizedModule.mk_smul_mk` : in the localized module, for any `r : R`, `s t : S`, `m : M`,
we have `mk r s • mk m t = mk (r • m) (s * t)` where `mk r s : Localization S` is localized ring
by `S`.
* `LocalizedModule.isModule` : `LocalizedModule M S` is a `Localization S`-module.
## Future work
* Redefine `Localization` for monoids and rings to coincide with `LocalizedModule`.
-/
namespace LocalizedModule
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R)
variable (M : Type v) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (T : Type*) [CommSemiring T] [Algebra R T] [IsLocalization S T]
/-- The equivalence relation on `M × S` where `(m1, s1) ≈ (m2, s2)` if and only if
for some (u : S), u * (s2 • m1 - s1 • m2) = 0-/
/- Porting note: We use small letter `r` since `R` is used for a ring. -/
def r (a b : M × S) : Prop :=
∃ u : S, u • b.2 • a.1 = u • a.2 • b.1
#align localized_module.r LocalizedModule.r
theorem r.isEquiv : IsEquiv _ (r S M) :=
{ refl := fun ⟨m, s⟩ => ⟨1, by rw [one_smul]⟩
trans := fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨m3, s3⟩ ⟨u1, hu1⟩ ⟨u2, hu2⟩ => by
use u1 * u2 * s2
-- Put everything in the same shape, sorting the terms using `simp`
have hu1' := congr_arg ((u2 * s3) • ·) hu1.symm
have hu2' := congr_arg ((u1 * s1) • ·) hu2.symm
simp only [← mul_smul, smul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] at hu1' hu2' ⊢
rw [hu2', hu1']
symm := fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨u, hu.symm⟩ }
#align localized_module.r.is_equiv LocalizedModule.r.isEquiv
instance r.setoid : Setoid (M × S) where
r := r S M
iseqv := ⟨(r.isEquiv S M).refl, (r.isEquiv S M).symm _ _, (r.isEquiv S M).trans _ _ _⟩
#align localized_module.r.setoid LocalizedModule.r.setoid
-- TODO: change `Localization` to use `r'` instead of `r` so that the two types are also defeq,
-- `Localization S = LocalizedModule S R`.
example {R} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R) : ⇑(Localization.r' S) = LocalizedModule.r S R :=
rfl
/-- If `S` is a multiplicative subset of a ring `R` and `M` an `R`-module, then
we can localize `M` by `S`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def _root_.LocalizedModule : Type max u v :=
Quotient (r.setoid S M)
#align localized_module LocalizedModule
section
variable {M S}
/-- The canonical map sending `(m, s) ↦ m/s`-/
def mk (m : M) (s : S) : LocalizedModule S M :=
Quotient.mk' ⟨m, s⟩
#align localized_module.mk LocalizedModule.mk
theorem mk_eq {m m' : M} {s s' : S} : mk m s = mk m' s' ↔ ∃ u : S, u • s' • m = u • s • m' :=
Quotient.eq'
#align localized_module.mk_eq LocalizedModule.mk_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {β : LocalizedModule S M → Prop} (h : ∀ (m : M) (s : S), β (mk m s)) :
∀ x : LocalizedModule S M, β x := by
rintro ⟨⟨m, s⟩⟩
exact h m s
#align localized_module.induction_on LocalizedModule.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {β : LocalizedModule S M → LocalizedModule S M → Prop}
(h : ∀ (m m' : M) (s s' : S), β (mk m s) (mk m' s')) : ∀ x y, β x y := by
rintro ⟨⟨m, s⟩⟩ ⟨⟨m', s'⟩⟩
exact h m m' s s'
#align localized_module.induction_on₂ LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
/-- If `f : M × S → α` respects the equivalence relation `LocalizedModule.r`, then
`f` descents to a map `LocalizedModule M S → α`.
-/
def liftOn {α : Type*} (x : LocalizedModule S M) (f : M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p p' : M × S), p ≈ p' → f p = f p') : α :=
Quotient.liftOn x f wd
#align localized_module.lift_on LocalizedModule.liftOn
theorem liftOn_mk {α : Type*} {f : M × S → α} (wd : ∀ (p p' : M × S), p ≈ p' → f p = f p')
(m : M) (s : S) : liftOn (mk m s) f wd = f ⟨m, s⟩ := by convert Quotient.liftOn_mk f wd ⟨m, s⟩
#align localized_module.lift_on_mk LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk
/-- If `f : M × S → M × S → α` respects the equivalence relation `LocalizedModule.r`, then
`f` descents to a map `LocalizedModule M S → LocalizedModule M S → α`.
-/
def liftOn₂ {α : Type*} (x y : LocalizedModule S M) (f : M × S → M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p q p' q' : M × S), p ≈ p' → q ≈ q' → f p q = f p' q') : α :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ x y f wd
#align localized_module.lift_on₂ LocalizedModule.liftOn₂
theorem liftOn₂_mk {α : Type*} (f : M × S → M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p q p' q' : M × S), p ≈ p' → q ≈ q' → f p q = f p' q') (m m' : M)
(s s' : S) : liftOn₂ (mk m s) (mk m' s') f wd = f ⟨m, s⟩ ⟨m', s'⟩ := by
convert Quotient.liftOn₂_mk f wd _ _
#align localized_module.lift_on₂_mk LocalizedModule.liftOn₂_mk
instance : Zero (LocalizedModule S M) :=
⟨mk 0 1⟩
/-- If `S` contains `0` then the localization at `S` is trivial. -/
theorem subsingleton (h : 0 ∈ S) : Subsingleton (LocalizedModule S M) := by
refine ⟨fun a b ↦ ?_⟩
induction a,b using LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨⟨0, h⟩, by simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul, zero_smul]⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_mk (s : S) : mk (0 : M) s = 0 :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, smul_zero, smul_zero, one_smul]⟩
#align localized_module.zero_mk LocalizedModule.zero_mk
instance : Add (LocalizedModule S M) where
add p1 p2 :=
liftOn₂ p1 p2 (fun x y => mk (y.2 • x.1 + x.2 • y.1) (x.2 * y.2)) <|
fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨m1', s1'⟩ ⟨m2', s2'⟩ ⟨u1, hu1⟩ ⟨u2, hu2⟩ =>
mk_eq.mpr
⟨u1 * u2, by
-- Put everything in the same shape, sorting the terms using `simp`
have hu1' := congr_arg ((u2 * s2 * s2') • ·) hu1
have hu2' := congr_arg ((u1 * s1 * s1') • ·) hu2
simp only [smul_add, ← mul_smul, smul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm] at hu1' hu2' ⊢
rw [hu1', hu2']⟩
theorem mk_add_mk {m1 m2 : M} {s1 s2 : S} :
mk m1 s1 + mk m2 s2 = mk (s2 • m1 + s1 • m2) (s1 * s2) :=
mk_eq.mpr <| ⟨1, rfl⟩
#align localized_module.mk_add_mk LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk
/-- Porting note: Some auxiliary lemmas are declared with `private` in the original mathlib3 file.
We take that policy here as well, and remove the `#align` lines accordingly. -/
private theorem add_assoc' (x y z : LocalizedModule S M) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
induction' x using LocalizedModule.induction_on with mx sx
induction' y using LocalizedModule.induction_on with my sy
induction' z using LocalizedModule.induction_on with mz sz
simp only [mk_add_mk, smul_add]
refine mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, ?_⟩
rw [one_smul, one_smul]
congr 1
· rw [mul_assoc]
· rw [eq_comm, mul_comm, add_assoc, mul_smul, mul_smul, ← mul_smul sx sz, mul_comm, mul_smul]
private theorem add_comm' (x y : LocalizedModule S M) : x + y = y + x :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on₂ (fun m m' s s' => by rw [mk_add_mk, mk_add_mk, add_comm, mul_comm])
x y
private theorem zero_add' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : 0 + x = x :=
induction_on
(fun m s => by
rw [← zero_mk s, mk_add_mk, smul_zero, zero_add, mk_eq];
exact ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, mul_smul, one_smul]⟩)
x
private theorem add_zero' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : x + 0 = x :=
induction_on
(fun m s => by
rw [← zero_mk s, mk_add_mk, smul_zero, add_zero, mk_eq];
exact ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, mul_smul, one_smul]⟩)
x
instance hasNatSMul : SMul ℕ (LocalizedModule S M) where smul n := nsmulRec n
#align localized_module.has_nat_smul LocalizedModule.hasNatSMul
private theorem nsmul_zero' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : (0 : ℕ) • x = 0 :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on (fun _ _ => rfl) x
private theorem nsmul_succ' (n : ℕ) (x : LocalizedModule S M) : n.succ • x = n • x + x :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on (fun _ _ => rfl) x
instance : AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S M) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := add_assoc'
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add'
add_zero := add_zero'
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := nsmul_zero'
nsmul_succ := nsmul_succ'
add_comm := add_comm'
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] : Neg (LocalizedModule S M) where
neg p :=
liftOn p (fun x => LocalizedModule.mk (-x.1) x.2) fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => by
rw [mk_eq]
exact ⟨u, by simpa⟩
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] : AddCommGroup (LocalizedModule S M) :=
{ show AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S M) by infer_instance with
add_left_neg := by
rintro ⟨m, s⟩
change
(liftOn (mk m s) (fun x => mk (-x.1) x.2) fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => by
rw [mk_eq]
exact ⟨u, by simpa⟩) +
mk m s =
0
rw [liftOn_mk, mk_add_mk]
simp
-- TODO: fix the diamond
zsmul := zsmulRec }
theorem mk_neg {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {m : M} {s : S} : mk (-m) s = -mk m s :=
rfl
#align localized_module.mk_neg LocalizedModule.mk_neg
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Monoid (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ mul := fun m₁ m₂ =>
liftOn₂ m₁ m₂ (fun x₁ x₂ => LocalizedModule.mk (x₁.1 * x₂.1) (x₁.2 * x₂.2))
(by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨b₁, t₁⟩ ⟨b₂, t₂⟩ ⟨u₁, e₁⟩ ⟨u₂, e₂⟩
rw [mk_eq]
use u₁ * u₂
dsimp only at e₁ e₂ ⊢
rw [eq_comm]
trans (u₁ • t₁ • a₁) • u₂ • t₂ • a₂
on_goal 1 => rw [e₁, e₂]
on_goal 2 => rw [eq_comm]
all_goals
rw [smul_smul, mul_mul_mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, ← smul_eq_mul A, smul_smul_smul_comm,
mul_smul, mul_smul])
one := mk 1 (1 : S)
one_mul := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_mul, one_smul]⟩
mul_one := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [mul_one, one_smul]⟩
mul_assoc := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm] }
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Semiring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show (AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance,
show (Monoid (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance with
left_distrib := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_add, mul_add, mul_smul_comm, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_right_comm]
right_distrib := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_add, add_mul, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc,
mul_right_comm]
zero_mul := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [zero_mul, smul_zero]⟩
mul_zero := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [mul_zero, smul_zero]⟩ }
instance {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
CommSemiring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show Semiring (LocalizedModule S A) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_smul, mul_comm]⟩ }
instance {A : Type*} [Ring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Ring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (LocalizedModule S A)),
inferInstanceAs (Semiring (LocalizedModule S A)) with }
instance {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
CommRing (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show (Ring (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_smul, mul_comm]⟩ }
theorem mk_mul_mk {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {a₁ a₂ : A} {s₁ s₂ : S} :
mk a₁ s₁ * mk a₂ s₂ = mk (a₁ * a₂) (s₁ * s₂) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.mk_mul_mk LocalizedModule.mk_mul_mk
noncomputable instance : SMul T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul x p :=
let a := IsLocalization.sec S x
liftOn p (fun p ↦ mk (a.1 • p.1) (a.2 * p.2))
(by
rintro p p' ⟨s, h⟩
refine mk_eq.mpr ⟨s, ?_⟩
calc
_ = a.2 • a.1 • s • p'.2 • p.1 := by
simp_rw [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_smul]; ring_nf
_ = a.2 • a.1 • s • p.2 • p'.1 := by rw [h]
_ = s • (a.2 * p.2) • a.1 • p'.1 := by
simp_rw [Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_smul, Submonoid.coe_mul]; ring_nf )
theorem smul_def (x : T) (m : M) (s : S) :
x • mk m s = mk ((IsLocalization.sec S x).1 • m) ((IsLocalization.sec S x).2 * s) := rfl
theorem mk'_smul_mk (r : R) (m : M) (s s' : S) :
IsLocalization.mk' T r s • mk m s' = mk (r • m) (s * s') := by
rw [smul_def, mk_eq]
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := IsLocalization.eq.mp <| IsLocalization.mk'_sec T (IsLocalization.mk' T r s)
use c
simp_rw [← mul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ (s':R), mul_assoc, hc]
theorem mk_smul_mk (r : R) (m : M) (s t : S) :
Localization.mk r s • mk m t = mk (r • m) (s * t) := by
rw [Localization.mk_eq_mk']
exact mk'_smul_mk ..
#align localized_module.mk_smul_mk LocalizedModule.mk_smul_mk
variable {T}
private theorem one_smul_aux (p : LocalizedModule S M) : (1 : T) • p = p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [show (1:T) = IsLocalization.mk' T (1:R) (1:S) by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_one, map_one]]
rw [mk'_smul_mk, one_smul, one_mul]
private theorem mul_smul_aux (x y : T) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
(x * y) • p = x • y • p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, ← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T y]
simp_rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_mul, mk'_smul_mk, ← mul_smul, mul_assoc]
private theorem smul_add_aux (x : T) (p q : LocalizedModule S M) :
x • (p + q) = x • p + x • q := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
induction' q using LocalizedModule.induction_on with n t
rw [smul_def, smul_def, mk_add_mk, mk_add_mk]
rw [show x • _ = IsLocalization.mk' T _ _ • _ by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T]]
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_cancel _ _ (IsLocalization.sec S x).2, mk'_smul_mk]
congr 1
· simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, smul_add, ← mul_smul, Submonoid.coe_mul]; ring_nf
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm] -- ring does not work here
private theorem smul_zero_aux (x : T) : x • (0 : LocalizedModule S M) = 0 := by
erw [smul_def, smul_zero, zero_mk]
private theorem add_smul_aux (x y : T) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
(x + y) • p = x • p + y • p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [smul_def T x, smul_def T y, mk_add_mk, show (x + y) • _ = IsLocalization.mk' T _ _ • _ by
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, ← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T y,
← IsLocalization.mk'_add, IsLocalization.mk'_cancel _ _ s], mk'_smul_mk, ← smul_assoc,
← smul_assoc, ← add_smul]
congr 1
· simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, smul_eq_mul]; ring_nf
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_assoc] -- ring does not work here
private theorem zero_smul_aux (p : LocalizedModule S M) : (0 : T) • p = 0 := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [show (0:T) = IsLocalization.mk' T (0:R) (1:S) by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_zero], mk'_smul_mk,
zero_smul, zero_mk]
noncomputable instance isModule : Module T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul := one_smul_aux
mul_smul := mul_smul_aux
smul_add := smul_add_aux
smul_zero := smul_zero_aux
add_smul := add_smul_aux
zero_smul := zero_smul_aux
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel_common_left (s' s : S) (m : M) : mk (s' • m) (s' * s) = mk m s :=
mk_eq.mpr
⟨1, by
simp only [mul_smul, one_smul]
rw [smul_comm]⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel_common_left LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel (s : S) (m : M) : mk (s • m) s = mk m 1 :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel LocalizedModule.mk_cancel
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel_common_right (s s' : S) (m : M) : mk (s' • m) (s * s') = mk m s :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp [mul_smul]⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel_common_right LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_right
noncomputable instance isModule' : Module R (LocalizedModule S M) :=
{ Module.compHom (LocalizedModule S M) <| algebraMap R (Localization S) with }
#align localized_module.is_module' LocalizedModule.isModule'
theorem smul'_mk (r : R) (s : S) (m : M) : r • mk m s = mk (r • m) s := by
erw [mk_smul_mk r m 1 s, one_mul]
#align localized_module.smul'_mk LocalizedModule.smul'_mk
theorem smul'_mul {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (x : T) (p₁ p₂ : LocalizedModule S A) :
x • p₁ * p₂ = x • (p₁ * p₂) := by
induction p₁, p₂ using induction_on₂ with | _ a₁ s₁ a₂ s₂ => _
rw [mk_mul_mk, smul_def, smul_def, mk_mul_mk, mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc]
theorem mul_smul' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (x : T) (p₁ p₂ : LocalizedModule S A) :
p₁ * x • p₂ = x • (p₁ * p₂) := by
induction p₁, p₂ using induction_on₂ with | _ a₁ s₁ a₂ s₂ => _
rw [smul_def, mk_mul_mk, mk_mul_mk, smul_def, mul_left_comm, mul_smul_comm]
variable (T)
noncomputable instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Algebra T (LocalizedModule S A) :=
Algebra.ofModule smul'_mul mul_smul'
theorem algebraMap_mk' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (a : R) (s : S) :
algebraMap _ _ (IsLocalization.mk' T a s) = mk (algebraMap R A a) s := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
change _ • mk _ _ = _
rw [mk'_smul_mk, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, mul_one]
theorem algebraMap_mk {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (a : R) (s : S) :
algebraMap _ _ (Localization.mk a s) = mk (algebraMap R A a) s := by
rw [Localization.mk_eq_mk']
exact algebraMap_mk' ..
#align localized_module.algebra_map_mk LocalizedModule.algebraMap_mk
instance : IsScalarTower R T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul_assoc r x p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, IsLocalization.smul_mk', mk'_smul_mk, mk'_smul_mk,
smul'_mk, mul_smul]
noncomputable instance algebra' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] :
Algebra R (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ (algebraMap (Localization S) (LocalizedModule S A)).comp (algebraMap R <| Localization S),
show Module R (LocalizedModule S A) by infer_instance with
commutes' := by
intro r x
induction x using induction_on with | _ a s => _
dsimp
rw [← Localization.mk_one_eq_algebraMap, algebraMap_mk, mk_mul_mk, mk_mul_mk, mul_comm,
Algebra.commutes]
smul_def' := by
intro r x
induction x using induction_on with | _ a s => _
dsimp
rw [← Localization.mk_one_eq_algebraMap, algebraMap_mk, mk_mul_mk, smul'_mk,
Algebra.smul_def, one_mul] }
#align localized_module.algebra' LocalizedModule.algebra'
section
variable (S M)
/-- The function `m ↦ m / 1` as an `R`-linear map.
-/
@[simps]
def mkLinearMap : M →ₗ[R] LocalizedModule S M where
toFun m := mk m 1
map_add' x y := by simp [mk_add_mk]
map_smul' r x := (smul'_mk _ _ _).symm
#align localized_module.mk_linear_map LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap
end
/-- For any `s : S`, there is an `R`-linear map given by `a/b ↦ a/(b*s)`.
-/
@[simps]
def divBy (s : S) : LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] LocalizedModule S M where
toFun p :=
p.liftOn (fun p => mk p.1 (p.2 * s)) fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨a', b'⟩ ⟨c, eq1⟩ =>
mk_eq.mpr ⟨c, by rw [mul_smul, mul_smul, smul_comm _ s, smul_comm _ s, eq1, smul_comm _ s,
smul_comm _ s]⟩
map_add' x y := by
refine x.induction_on₂ ?_ y
intro m₁ m₂ t₁ t₂
simp_rw [mk_add_mk, LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, mk_add_mk, mul_smul, mul_comm _ s, mul_assoc,
smul_comm _ s, ← smul_add, mul_left_comm s t₁ t₂, mk_cancel_common_left s]
map_smul' r x := by
refine x.induction_on (fun _ _ ↦ ?_)
dsimp only
change liftOn (mk _ _) _ _ = r • (liftOn (mk _ _) _ _)
simp_rw [liftOn_mk, mul_assoc, ← smul_def]
congr!
#align localized_module.div_by LocalizedModule.divBy
theorem divBy_mul_by (s : S) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
divBy s (algebraMap R (Module.End R (LocalizedModule S M)) s p) = p :=
p.induction_on fun m t => by
rw [Module.algebraMap_end_apply, divBy_apply]
erw [smul_def]
rw [LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, mul_assoc, ← smul_def]
erw [smul'_mk]
rw [← Submonoid.smul_def, mk_cancel_common_right _ s]
#align localized_module.div_by_mul_by LocalizedModule.divBy_mul_by
theorem mul_by_divBy (s : S) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
algebraMap R (Module.End R (LocalizedModule S M)) s (divBy s p) = p :=
p.induction_on fun m t => by
rw [divBy_apply, Module.algebraMap_end_apply, LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, smul'_mk,
← Submonoid.smul_def, mk_cancel_common_right _ s]
#align localized_module.mul_by_div_by LocalizedModule.mul_by_divBy
end
end LocalizedModule
section IsLocalizedModule
universe u v
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R)
variable {M M' M'' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M'']
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Module A M'] [IsLocalization S A]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M''] [IsScalarTower R A M']
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
/-- The characteristic predicate for localized module.
`IsLocalizedModule S f` describes that `f : M ⟶ M'` is the localization map identifying `M'` as
`LocalizedModule S M`.
-/
@[mk_iff] class IsLocalizedModule : Prop where
map_units : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M') x)
surj' : ∀ y : M', ∃ x : M × S, x.2 • y = f x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ {x₁ x₂}, f x₁ = f x₂ → ∃ c : S, c • x₁ = c • x₂
#align is_localized_module IsLocalizedModule
attribute [nolint docBlame] IsLocalizedModule.map_units IsLocalizedModule.surj'
IsLocalizedModule.exists_of_eq
-- Porting note: Manually added to make `S` and `f` explicit.
lemma IsLocalizedModule.surj [IsLocalizedModule S f] (y : M') : ∃ x : M × S, x.2 • y = f x.1 :=
surj' y
-- Porting note: Manually added to make `S` and `f` explicit.
lemma IsLocalizedModule.eq_iff_exists [IsLocalizedModule S f] {x₁ x₂} :
f x₁ = f x₂ ↔ ∃ c : S, c • x₁ = c • x₂ :=
Iff.intro exists_of_eq fun ⟨c, h⟩ ↦ by
apply_fun f at h
simp_rw [f.map_smul_of_tower, Submonoid.smul_def, ← Module.algebraMap_end_apply R R] at h
exact ((Module.End_isUnit_iff _).mp <| map_units f c).1 h
theorem IsLocalizedModule.of_linearEquiv (e : M' ≃ₗ[R] M'') [hf : IsLocalizedModule S f] :
IsLocalizedModule S (e ∘ₗ f : M →ₗ[R] M'') where
map_units s := by
rw [show algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') s = e ∘ₗ (algebraMap R (Module.End R M') s) ∘ₗ e.symm
by ext; simp, Module.End_isUnit_iff, LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, EquivLike.comp_bijective, EquivLike.bijective_comp]
exact (Module.End_isUnit_iff _).mp <| hf.map_units s
surj' x := by
obtain ⟨p, h⟩ := hf.surj' (e.symm x)
exact ⟨p, by rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, ← e.congr_arg h,
Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.smul_def, LinearEquiv.map_smul, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]⟩
exists_of_eq h := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply,
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq] at h
exact hf.exists_of_eq h
variable (M) in
lemma isLocalizedModule_id (R') [CommSemiring R'] [Algebra R R'] [IsLocalization S R'] [Module R' M]
[IsScalarTower R R' M] : IsLocalizedModule S (.id : M →ₗ[R] M) where
map_units s := by
rw [← (Algebra.lsmul R (A := R') R M).commutes]; exact (IsLocalization.map_units R' s).map _
surj' m := ⟨(m, 1), one_smul _ _⟩
exists_of_eq h := ⟨1, congr_arg _ h⟩
variable {S} in
theorem isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization {A Aₛ} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [CommSemiring Aₛ]
[Algebra A Aₛ] [Algebra R Aₛ] [IsScalarTower R A Aₛ] :
IsLocalizedModule S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A Aₛ).toLinearMap ↔
IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid A S) Aₛ := by
rw [isLocalizedModule_iff, isLocalization_iff]
refine and_congr ?_ (and_congr (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ ?_) (forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ ?_))
· simp_rw [← (Algebra.lmul R Aₛ).commutes, Algebra.lmul_isUnit_iff, Subtype.forall,
Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid, ← SetLike.mem_coe, Submonoid.coe_map,
Set.forall_mem_image, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
· simp_rw [Prod.exists, Subtype.exists, Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid]
simp [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, Submonoid.mk_smul, Algebra.smul_def, mul_comm]
· congr!; simp_rw [Subtype.exists, Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid]; simp [Algebra.smul_def]
instance {A Aₛ} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A][CommSemiring Aₛ] [Algebra A Aₛ] [Algebra R Aₛ]
[IsScalarTower R A Aₛ] [h : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid A S) Aₛ] :
IsLocalizedModule S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A Aₛ).toLinearMap :=
isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization.mpr h
lemma isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization' (R') [CommSemiring R'] [Algebra R R'] :
IsLocalizedModule S (Algebra.ofId R R').toLinearMap ↔ IsLocalization S R' := by
convert isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization (S := S) (A := R) (Aₛ := R')
exact (Submonoid.map_id S).symm
namespace LocalizedModule
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `LocalizedModule S M → M''`.
-/
noncomputable def lift' (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
(h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') x)) : LocalizedModule S M → M'' :=
fun m =>
m.liftOn (fun p => (h p.2).unit⁻¹.val <| g p.1) fun ⟨m, s⟩ ⟨m', s'⟩ ⟨c, eq1⟩ => by
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`. This does nothing here.
dsimp only
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def] at eq1
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← map_smul, eq_comm,
Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff]
have : c • s • g m' = c • s' • g m := by
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, ← g.map_smul, eq1]
have : Function.Injective (h c).unit.inv := by
rw [Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse]
refine ⟨(h c).unit, ?_⟩
intro x
change ((h c).unit.1 * (h c).unit.inv) x = x
simp only [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, IsUnit.mul_val_inv, LinearMap.one_apply]
apply_fun (h c).unit.inv
erw [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ←
(h c).unit⁻¹.val.map_smul]
symm
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← g.map_smul, ← g.map_smul, ← g.map_smul, ←
g.map_smul, eq1]
#align localized_module.lift' LocalizedModule.lift'
theorem lift'_mk (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(m : M) (s : S) :
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (LocalizedModule.mk m s) = (h s).unit⁻¹.val (g m) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.lift'_mk LocalizedModule.lift'_mk
theorem lift'_add (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(x y) :
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (x + y) =
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h x + LocalizedModule.lift' S g h y :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
(by
intro a a' b b'
erw [LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2 h3`. This only generalize `h1`.
erw [map_add, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, smul_add, ← map_smul,
← map_smul, ← map_smul]
congr 1 <;> symm
· erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, mul_smul, ← map_smul]
rfl
· dsimp
erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, mul_comm, mul_smul, ← map_smul]
rfl)
x y
#align localized_module.lift'_add LocalizedModule.lift'_add
theorem lift'_smul (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(r : R) (m) : r • LocalizedModule.lift' S g h m = LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (r • m) :=
m.induction_on fun a b => by
rw [LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.smul'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`. This does nothing here.
rw [← map_smul, ← g.map_smul]
#align localized_module.lift'_smul LocalizedModule.lift'_smul
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `LocalizedModule S M → M''`.
-/
noncomputable def lift (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
(h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) :
LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] M'' where
toFun := LocalizedModule.lift' S g h
map_add' := LocalizedModule.lift'_add S g h
map_smul' r x := by rw [LocalizedModule.lift'_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
#align localized_module.lift LocalizedModule.lift
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
`lift g m s = s⁻¹ • g m`.
-/
theorem lift_mk
(g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') x)) (m : M) (s : S) :
LocalizedModule.lift S g h (LocalizedModule.mk m s) = (h s).unit⁻¹.val (g m) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.lift_mk LocalizedModule.lift_mk
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `lift g ∘ mkLinearMap = g`.
-/
theorem lift_comp (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) :
(lift S g h).comp (mkLinearMap S M) = g := by
ext x; dsimp; rw [LocalizedModule.lift_mk]
erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, one_smul]
#align localized_module.lift_comp LocalizedModule.lift_comp
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible and
`l` is another linear map `LocalizedModule S M ⟶ M''` such that `l ∘ mkLinearMap = g` then
`l = lift g`
-/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/LocalizedModule.lean | 724 | 732 | theorem lift_unique (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(l : LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] M'') (hl : l.comp (LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap S M) = g) :
LocalizedModule.lift S g h = l := by |
ext x; induction' x using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [LocalizedModule.lift_mk]
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← hl, LinearMap.coe_comp,
Function.comp_apply, LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap_apply, ← l.map_smul, LocalizedModule.smul'_mk]
congr 1; rw [LocalizedModule.mk_eq]
refine ⟨1, ?_⟩; simp only [one_smul, Submonoid.smul_def]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.function.simple_func from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
/-!
# Simple functions
A function `f` from a measurable space to any type is called *simple*, if every preimage `f ⁻¹' {x}`
is measurable, and the range is finite. In this file, we define simple functions and establish their
basic properties; and we construct a sequence of simple functions approximating an arbitrary Borel
measurable function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`.
The theorem `Measurable.ennreal_induction` shows that in order to prove something for an arbitrary
measurable function into `ℝ≥0∞`, it is sufficient to show that the property holds for (multiples of)
characteristic functions and is closed under addition and supremum of increasing sequences of
functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- A function `f` from a measurable space to any type is called *simple*,
if every preimage `f ⁻¹' {x}` is measurable, and the range is finite. This structure bundles
a function with these properties. -/
structure SimpleFunc.{u, v} (α : Type u) [MeasurableSpace α] (β : Type v) where
toFun : α → β
measurableSet_fiber' : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (toFun ⁻¹' {x})
finite_range' : (Set.range toFun).Finite
#align measure_theory.simple_func MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
#align measure_theory.simple_func.to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.toFun
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_fiber' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber'
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finite_range' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finite_range'
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →ₛ β) fun _ => α → β :=
⟨toFun⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instCoeFun
theorem coe_injective ⦃f g : α →ₛ β⦄ (H : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_injective MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ₛ β} (H : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
coe_injective <| funext H
#align measure_theory.simple_func.ext MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ext
theorem finite_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (Set.range f).Finite :=
f.finite_range'
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finite_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finite_range
theorem measurableSet_fiber (f : α →ₛ β) (x : β) : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
f.measurableSet_fiber' x
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_fiber MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem apply_mk (f : α → β) (h h') (x : α) : SimpleFunc.mk f h h' x = f x :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.apply_mk MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.apply_mk
/-- Simple function defined on a finite type. -/
def ofFinite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : α →ₛ β where
toFun := f
measurableSet_fiber' x := (toFinite (f ⁻¹' {x})).measurableSet
finite_range' := Set.finite_range f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")] alias ofFintype := ofFinite
/-- Simple function defined on the empty type. -/
def ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : α →ₛ β := ofFinite isEmptyElim
#align measure_theory.simple_func.of_is_empty MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ofIsEmpty
/-- Range of a simple function `α →ₛ β` as a `Finset β`. -/
protected def range (f : α →ₛ β) : Finset β :=
f.finite_range.toFinset
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {b} : b ∈ f.range ↔ b ∈ range f :=
Finite.mem_toFinset _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range
theorem mem_range_self (f : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : f x ∈ f.range :=
mem_range.2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range_self MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range_self
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (↑f.range : Set β) = Set.range f :=
f.finite_range.coe_toFinset
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_range
theorem mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero {f : α →ₛ β} {x : β} {μ : Measure α} (H : μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) ≠ 0) :
x ∈ f.range :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero H
mem_range.2 ⟨a, ha⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero
theorem forall_mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) := by
simp only [mem_range, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.forall_mem_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.forall_mem_range
theorem exists_range_iff {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) := by
simpa only [mem_range, exists_prop] using Set.exists_range_iff
#align measure_theory.simple_func.exists_range_iff MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.exists_range_iff
theorem preimage_eq_empty_iff (f : α →ₛ β) (b : β) : f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ↔ b ∉ f.range :=
preimage_singleton_eq_empty.trans <| not_congr mem_range.symm
#align measure_theory.simple_func.preimage_eq_empty_iff MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.preimage_eq_empty_iff
theorem exists_forall_le [Nonempty β] [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] (f : α →ₛ β) :
∃ C, ∀ x, f x ≤ C :=
f.range.exists_le.imp fun _ => forall_mem_range.1
#align measure_theory.simple_func.exists_forall_le MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.exists_forall_le
/-- Constant function as a `SimpleFunc`. -/
def const (α) {β} [MeasurableSpace α] (b : β) : α →ₛ β :=
⟨fun _ => b, fun _ => MeasurableSet.const _, finite_range_const⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const
instance instInhabited [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨const _ default⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.inhabited MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instInhabited
theorem const_apply (a : α) (b : β) : (const α b) a = b :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = Function.const α b :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_const
@[simp]
theorem range_const (α) [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty α] (b : β) : (const α b).range = {b} :=
Finset.coe_injective <| by simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Function.const]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_const
theorem range_const_subset (α) [MeasurableSpace α] (b : β) : (const α b).range ⊆ {b} :=
Finset.coe_subset.1 <| by simp
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_const_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_const_subset
theorem simpleFunc_bot {α} (f : @SimpleFunc α ⊥ β) [Nonempty β] : ∃ c, ∀ x, f x = c := by
have hf_meas := @SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber α _ ⊥ f
simp_rw [MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_bot_iff] at hf_meas
exact (exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton hf_meas).imp fun c hc ↦ congr_fun hc
#align measure_theory.simple_func.simple_func_bot MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot
theorem simpleFunc_bot' {α} [Nonempty β] (f : @SimpleFunc α ⊥ β) :
∃ c, f = @SimpleFunc.const α _ ⊥ c :=
letI : MeasurableSpace α := ⊥; (simpleFunc_bot f).imp fun _ ↦ ext
#align measure_theory.simple_func.simple_func_bot' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot'
theorem measurableSet_cut (r : α → β → Prop) (f : α →ₛ β) (h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet { a | r a b }) :
MeasurableSet { a | r a (f a) } := by
have : { a | r a (f a) } = ⋃ b ∈ range f, { a | r a b } ∩ f ⁻¹' {b} := by
ext a
suffices r a (f a) ↔ ∃ i, r a (f i) ∧ f a = f i by simpa
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ⟨h, rfl⟩⟩, fun ⟨a', ⟨h', e⟩⟩ => e.symm ▸ h'⟩
rw [this]
exact
MeasurableSet.biUnion f.finite_range.countable fun b _ =>
MeasurableSet.inter (h b) (f.measurableSet_fiber _)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_cut MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_cut
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (s) : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) :=
measurableSet_cut (fun _ b => b ∈ s) f fun b => MeasurableSet.const (b ∈ s)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_preimage MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_preimage
/-- A simple function is measurable -/
@[measurability]
protected theorem measurable [MeasurableSpace β] (f : α →ₛ β) : Measurable f := fun s _ =>
measurableSet_preimage f s
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurable
@[measurability]
protected theorem aemeasurable [MeasurableSpace β] {μ : Measure α} (f : α →ₛ β) :
AEMeasurable f μ :=
f.measurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.simple_func.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.aemeasurable
protected theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) {μ : Measure α} (s : Finset β) :
(∑ y ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) :=
sum_measure_preimage_singleton _ fun _ _ => f.measurableSet_fiber _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (μ : Measure α) :
(∑ y ∈ f.range, μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) = μ univ := by
rw [f.sum_measure_preimage_singleton, coe_range, preimage_range]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton
/-- If-then-else as a `SimpleFunc`. -/
def piecewise (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ β :=
⟨s.piecewise f g, fun _ =>
letI : MeasurableSpace β := ⊤
f.measurable.piecewise hs g.measurable trivial,
(f.finite_range.union g.finite_range).subset range_ite_subset⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise
@[simp]
theorem coe_piecewise {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) :
⇑(piecewise s hs f g) = s.piecewise f g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_piecewise MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise
theorem piecewise_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) (a) :
piecewise s hs f g a = if a ∈ s then f a else g a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_apply
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_compl {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet sᶜ) (f g : α →ₛ β) :
piecewise sᶜ hs f g = piecewise s hs.of_compl g f :=
coe_injective <| by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp [hs]; convert Set.piecewise_compl s f g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_compl MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_compl
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_univ (f g : α →ₛ β) : piecewise univ MeasurableSet.univ f g = f :=
coe_injective <| by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp; convert Set.piecewise_univ f g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_univ MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_univ
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_empty (f g : α →ₛ β) : piecewise ∅ MeasurableSet.empty f g = g :=
coe_injective <| by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp; convert Set.piecewise_empty f g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_empty MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_empty
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_same (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s hs f f = f :=
coe_injective <| Set.piecewise_same _ _
theorem support_indicator [Zero β] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α →ₛ β) :
Function.support (f.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const α 0)) = s ∩ Function.support f :=
Set.support_indicator
#align measure_theory.simple_func.support_indicator MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.support_indicator
theorem range_indicator {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hs_nonempty : s.Nonempty)
(hs_ne_univ : s ≠ univ) (x y : β) :
(piecewise s hs (const α x) (const α y)).range = {x, y} := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_inj, coe_range, coe_piecewise, range_piecewise, coe_const,
Finset.coe_insert, Finset.coe_singleton, hs_nonempty.image_const,
(nonempty_compl.2 hs_ne_univ).image_const, singleton_union, Function.const]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_indicator MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_indicator
theorem measurable_bind [MeasurableSpace γ] (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α → γ)
(hg : ∀ b, Measurable (g b)) : Measurable fun a => g (f a) a := fun s hs =>
f.measurableSet_cut (fun a b => g b a ∈ s) fun b => hg b hs
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_bind MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurable_bind
/-- If `f : α →ₛ β` is a simple function and `g : β → α →ₛ γ` is a family of simple functions,
then `f.bind g` binds the first argument of `g` to `f`. In other words, `f.bind g a = g (f a) a`. -/
def bind (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α →ₛ γ) : α →ₛ γ :=
⟨fun a => g (f a) a, fun c =>
f.measurableSet_cut (fun a b => g b a = c) fun b => (g b).measurableSet_preimage {c},
(f.finite_range.biUnion fun b _ => (g b).finite_range).subset <| by
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩; simp⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.bind MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α →ₛ γ) (a) : f.bind g a = g (f a) a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.bind_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.bind_apply
/-- Given a function `g : β → γ` and a simple function `f : α →ₛ β`, `f.map g` return the simple
function `g ∘ f : α →ₛ γ` -/
def map (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ γ :=
bind f (const α ∘ g)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map
theorem map_apply (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) (a) : f.map g a = g (f a) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_apply
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (h : γ → δ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g).map h = f.map (h ∘ g) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g : α → γ) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem range_map [DecidableEq γ] (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g).range = f.range.image g :=
Finset.coe_injective <| by simp only [coe_range, coe_map, Finset.coe_image, range_comp]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_map
@[simp]
theorem map_const (g : β → γ) (b : β) : (const α b).map g = const α (g b) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_const
theorem map_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → γ) (s : Set γ) :
f.map g ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' ↑(f.range.filter fun b => g b ∈ s) := by
simp only [coe_range, sep_mem_eq, coe_map, Finset.coe_filter,
← mem_preimage, inter_comm, preimage_inter_range, ← Finset.mem_coe]
exact preimage_comp
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_preimage MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_preimage
theorem map_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → γ) (c : γ) :
f.map g ⁻¹' {c} = f ⁻¹' ↑(f.range.filter fun b => g b = c) :=
map_preimage _ _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_preimage_singleton
/-- Composition of a `SimpleFun` and a measurable function is a `SimpleFunc`. -/
def comp [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) (g : α → β) (hgm : Measurable g) : α →ₛ γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
finite_range' := f.finite_range.subset <| Set.range_comp_subset_range _ _
measurableSet_fiber' z := hgm (f.measurableSet_fiber z)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.comp MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.comp
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hgm : Measurable g) :
⇑(f.comp g hgm) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_comp MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_comp
theorem range_comp_subset_range [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hgm : Measurable g) :
(f.comp g hgm).range ⊆ f.range :=
Finset.coe_subset.1 <| by simp only [coe_range, coe_comp, Set.range_comp_subset_range]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_comp_subset_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_comp_subset_range
/-- Extend a `SimpleFunc` along a measurable embedding: `f₁.extend g hg f₂` is the function
`F : β →ₛ γ` such that `F ∘ g = f₁` and `F y = f₂ y` whenever `y ∉ range g`. -/
def extend [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) (g : α → β) (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : β →ₛ γ where
toFun := Function.extend g f₁ f₂
finite_range' :=
(f₁.finite_range.union <| f₂.finite_range.subset (image_subset_range _ _)).subset
(range_extend_subset _ _ _)
measurableSet_fiber' := by
letI : MeasurableSpace γ := ⊤; haveI : MeasurableSingletonClass γ := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
exact fun x => hg.measurable_extend f₁.measurable f₂.measurable (measurableSet_singleton _)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) (x : α) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂) (g x) = f₁ x :=
hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_apply
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply' [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) {y : β} (h : ¬∃ x, g x = y) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂) y = f₂ y :=
Function.extend_apply' _ _ _ h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_apply' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_apply'
@[simp]
theorem extend_comp_eq' [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : f₁.extend g hg f₂ ∘ g = f₁ :=
funext fun _ => extend_apply _ _ _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_comp_eq' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_comp_eq'
@[simp]
theorem extend_comp_eq [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂).comp g hg.measurable = f₁ :=
coe_injective <| extend_comp_eq' _ hg _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_comp_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_comp_eq
/-- If `f` is a simple function taking values in `β → γ` and `g` is another simple function
with the same domain and codomain `β`, then `f.seq g = f a (g a)`. -/
def seq (f : α →ₛ β → γ) (g : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ γ :=
f.bind fun f => g.map f
#align measure_theory.simple_func.seq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.seq
@[simp]
theorem seq_apply (f : α →ₛ β → γ) (g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : f.seq g a = f a (g a) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.seq_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.seq_apply
/-- Combine two simple functions `f : α →ₛ β` and `g : α →ₛ β`
into `fun a => (f a, g a)`. -/
def pair (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) : α →ₛ β × γ :=
(f.map Prod.mk).seq g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pair MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pair
@[simp]
theorem pair_apply (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (a) : pair f g a = (f a, g a) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pair_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pair_apply
theorem pair_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (s : Set β) (t : Set γ) :
pair f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pair_preimage MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pair_preimage
-- A special form of `pair_preimage`
theorem pair_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (b : β) (c : γ) :
pair f g ⁻¹' {(b, c)} = f ⁻¹' {b} ∩ g ⁻¹' {c} := by
rw [← singleton_prod_singleton]
exact pair_preimage _ _ _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pair_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pair_preimage_singleton
theorem bind_const (f : α →ₛ β) : f.bind (const α) = f := by ext; simp
#align measure_theory.simple_func.bind_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.bind_const
@[to_additive]
instance instOne [One β] : One (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨const α 1⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_one MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instOne
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instZero
@[to_additive]
instance instMul [Mul β] : Mul (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· * ·)).seq g⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_mul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instMul
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instAdd
@[to_additive]
instance instDiv [Div β] : Div (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· / ·)).seq g⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_div MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instDiv
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_sub MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instSub
@[to_additive]
instance instInv [Inv β] : Inv (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f => f.map Inv.inv⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_inv MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instInv
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_neg MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instNeg
instance instSup [Sup β] : Sup (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· ⊔ ·)).seq g⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_sup MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instSup
instance instInf [Inf β] : Inf (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· ⊓ ·)).seq g⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_inf MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instInf
instance instLE [LE β] : LE (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => ∀ a, f a ≤ g a⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_le MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instLE
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem const_one [One β] : const α (1 : β) = 1 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_one MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_one
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one [One β] : ⇑(1 : α →ₛ β) = 1 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_one MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_one
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul [Mul β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f * g) = ⇑f * ⇑g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_mul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_mul
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv [Inv β] (f : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f⁻¹) = (⇑f)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_inv MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_inv
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_neg MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div [Div β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f / g) = ⇑f / ⇑g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_div MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_div
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_sub MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le [Preorder β] {f g : α →ₛ β} : (f : α → β) ≤ g ↔ f ≤ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_le MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup [Sup β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = ⇑f ⊔ ⇑g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_sup MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf [Inf β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = ⇑f ⊓ ⇑g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_inf MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_apply [Mul β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f * g) a = f a * g a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mul_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mul_apply
#align measure_theory.simple_func.add_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.add_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem div_apply [Div β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : (f / g) x = f x / g x :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.div_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.div_apply
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sub_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sub_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_apply [Inv β] (f : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : f⁻¹ x = (f x)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.inv_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.inv_apply
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.neg_apply
theorem sup_apply [Sup β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sup_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sup_apply
theorem inf_apply [Inf β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.inf_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.inf_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem range_one [Nonempty α] [One β] : (1 : α →ₛ β).range = {1} :=
Finset.ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_one MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_one
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_zero
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_of_isEmpty {β} [hα : IsEmpty α] (f : α →ₛ β) : f.range = ∅ := by
rw [← Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
by_contra h
obtain ⟨y, hy_mem⟩ := h
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range, Set.mem_range] at hy_mem
obtain ⟨x, hxy⟩ := hy_mem
rw [isEmpty_iff] at hα
exact hα x
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_eq_empty_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_eq_empty_of_isEmpty
theorem eq_zero_of_mem_range_zero [Zero β] : ∀ {y : β}, y ∈ (0 : α →ₛ β).range → y = 0 :=
@(forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.eq_zero_of_mem_range_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.eq_zero_of_mem_range_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_map₂ [Mul β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : f * g = (pair f g).map fun p : β × β => p.1 * p.2 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mul_eq_map₂ MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mul_eq_map₂
#align measure_theory.simple_func.add_eq_map₂ MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.add_eq_map₂
theorem sup_eq_map₂ [Sup β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : f ⊔ g = (pair f g).map fun p : β × β => p.1 ⊔ p.2 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sup_eq_map₂ MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sup_eq_map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem const_mul_eq_map [Mul β] (f : α →ₛ β) (b : β) : const α b * f = f.map fun a => b * a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_mul_eq_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_mul_eq_map
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_add_eq_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_add_eq_map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul [Mul β] [Mul γ] {g : β → γ} (hg : ∀ x y, g (x * y) = g x * g y) (f₁ f₂ : α →ₛ β) :
(f₁ * f₂).map g = f₁.map g * f₂.map g :=
ext fun _ => hg _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_mul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_mul
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_add
variable {K : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance instSMul [SMul K β] : SMul K (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun k f => f.map (k • ·)⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instSMul
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_smul [SMul K β] (c : K) (f : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(c • f) = c • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_smul
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_apply [SMul K β] (k : K) (f : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (k • f) a = k • f a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.smul_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.smul_apply
instance hasNatSMul [AddMonoid β] : SMul ℕ (α →ₛ β) := inferInstance
@[to_additive existing hasNatSMul]
instance hasNatPow [Monoid β] : Pow (α →ₛ β) ℕ :=
⟨fun f n => f.map (· ^ n)⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_nat_pow MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.hasNatPow
@[simp]
theorem coe_pow [Monoid β] (f : α →ₛ β) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = (⇑f) ^ n :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_pow MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_pow
theorem pow_apply [Monoid β] (n : ℕ) (f : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ^ n) a = f a ^ n :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pow_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pow_apply
instance hasIntPow [DivInvMonoid β] : Pow (α →ₛ β) ℤ :=
⟨fun f n => f.map (· ^ n)⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_int_pow MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.hasIntPow
@[simp]
theorem coe_zpow [DivInvMonoid β] (f : α →ₛ β) (z : ℤ) : ⇑(f ^ z) = (⇑f) ^ z :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_zpow MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_zpow
theorem zpow_apply [DivInvMonoid β] (z : ℤ) (f : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ^ z) a = f a ^ z :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.zpow_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.zpow_apply
-- TODO: work out how to generate these instances with `to_additive`, which gets confused by the
-- argument order swap between `coe_smul` and `coe_pow`.
section Additive
instance instAddMonoid [AddMonoid β] : AddMonoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addMonoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add
fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.add_monoid MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instAddMonoid
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid β] : AddCommMonoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addCommMonoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add
fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instAddCommMonoid
instance instAddGroup [AddGroup β] : AddGroup (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addGroup (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add coe_neg
coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.add_group MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instAddGroup
instance instAddCommGroup [AddCommGroup β] : AddCommGroup (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addCommGroup (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add
coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.add_comm_group MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instAddCommGroup
end Additive
@[to_additive existing]
instance instMonoid [Monoid β] : Monoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.monoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
#align measure_theory.simple_func.monoid MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instMonoid
@[to_additive existing]
instance instCommMonoid [CommMonoid β] : CommMonoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.commMonoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
#align measure_theory.simple_func.comm_monoid MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instCommMonoid
@[to_additive existing]
instance instGroup [Group β] : Group (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.group (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_inv
coe_div coe_pow coe_zpow
#align measure_theory.simple_func.group MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instGroup
@[to_additive existing]
instance instCommGroup [CommGroup β] : CommGroup (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.commGroup (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_inv
coe_div coe_pow coe_zpow
#align measure_theory.simple_func.comm_group MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instCommGroup
instance instModule [Semiring K] [AddCommMonoid β] [Module K β] : Module K (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.module K ⟨⟨fun f => show α → β from f, coe_zero⟩, coe_add⟩
coe_injective coe_smul
#align measure_theory.simple_func.module MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instModule
theorem smul_eq_map [SMul K β] (k : K) (f : α →ₛ β) : k • f = f.map (k • ·) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.smul_eq_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.smul_eq_map
instance instPreorder [Preorder β] : Preorder (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instLE with
le_refl := fun f a => le_rfl
le_trans := fun f g h hfg hgh a => le_trans (hfg _) (hgh a) }
#align measure_theory.simple_func.preorder MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instPreorder
instance instPartialOrder [PartialOrder β] : PartialOrder (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instPreorder with
le_antisymm := fun _f _g hfg hgf => ext fun a => le_antisymm (hfg a) (hgf a) }
#align measure_theory.simple_func.partial_order MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instPartialOrder
instance instOrderBot [LE β] [OrderBot β] : OrderBot (α →ₛ β) where
bot := const α ⊥
bot_le _ _ := bot_le
#align measure_theory.simple_func.order_bot MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instOrderBot
instance instOrderTop [LE β] [OrderTop β] : OrderTop (α →ₛ β) where
top := const α ⊤
le_top _ _ := le_top
#align measure_theory.simple_func.order_top MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instOrderTop
instance instSemilatticeInf [SemilatticeInf β] : SemilatticeInf (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instPartialOrder with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => inf_le_right
le_inf := fun _f _g _h hfh hgh a => le_inf (hfh a) (hgh a) }
#align measure_theory.simple_func.semilattice_inf MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instSemilatticeInf
instance instSemilatticeSup [SemilatticeSup β] : SemilatticeSup (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instPartialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ => le_sup_left
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ => le_sup_right
sup_le := fun _f _g _h hfh hgh a => sup_le (hfh a) (hgh a) }
#align measure_theory.simple_func.semilattice_sup MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instSemilatticeSup
instance instLattice [Lattice β] : Lattice (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instSemilatticeSup, SimpleFunc.instSemilatticeInf with }
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lattice MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instLattice
instance instBoundedOrder [LE β] [BoundedOrder β] : BoundedOrder (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instOrderBot, SimpleFunc.instOrderTop with }
#align measure_theory.simple_func.bounded_order MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instBoundedOrder
theorem finset_sup_apply [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] {f : γ → α →ₛ β} (s : Finset γ) (a : α) :
s.sup f a = s.sup fun c => f c a := by
refine Finset.induction_on s rfl ?_
intro a s _ ih
rw [Finset.sup_insert, Finset.sup_insert, sup_apply, ih]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finset_sup_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finset_sup_apply
section Restrict
variable [Zero β]
/-- Restrict a simple function `f : α →ₛ β` to a set `s`. If `s` is measurable,
then `f.restrict s a = if a ∈ s then f a else 0`, otherwise `f.restrict s = const α 0`. -/
def restrict (f : α →ₛ β) (s : Set α) : α →ₛ β :=
if hs : MeasurableSet s then piecewise s hs f 0 else 0
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict
theorem restrict_of_not_measurable {f : α →ₛ β} {s : Set α} (hs : ¬MeasurableSet s) :
restrict f s = 0 :=
dif_neg hs
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_of_not_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_of_not_measurable
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrict (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
⇑(restrict f s) = indicator s f := by
rw [restrict, dif_pos hs, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_restrict
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ (f : α →ₛ β) : restrict f univ = f := by simp [restrict]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_univ MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_univ
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty (f : α →ₛ β) : restrict f ∅ = 0 := by simp [restrict]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_empty MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_empty
theorem map_restrict_of_zero [Zero γ] {g : β → γ} (hg : g 0 = 0) (f : α →ₛ β) (s : Set α) :
(f.restrict s).map g = (f.map g).restrict s :=
ext fun x =>
if hs : MeasurableSet s then by simp [hs, Set.indicator_comp_of_zero hg]
else by simp [restrict_of_not_measurable hs, hg]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_restrict_of_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_restrict_of_zero
theorem map_coe_ennreal_restrict (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (s : Set α) :
(f.restrict s).map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) = (f.map (↑)).restrict s :=
map_restrict_of_zero ENNReal.coe_zero _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_coe_ennreal_restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_coe_ennreal_restrict
theorem map_coe_nnreal_restrict (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (s : Set α) :
(f.restrict s).map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) = (f.map (↑)).restrict s :=
map_restrict_of_zero NNReal.coe_zero _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_coe_nnreal_restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_coe_nnreal_restrict
theorem restrict_apply (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a) :
restrict f s a = indicator s f a := by simp only [f.coe_restrict hs]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set β}
(ht : (0 : β) ∉ t) : restrict f s ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp [hs, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem _ _ ht, inter_comm]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_preimage MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage
theorem restrict_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {r : β}
(hr : r ≠ 0) : restrict f s ⁻¹' {r} = s ∩ f ⁻¹' {r} :=
f.restrict_preimage hs hr.symm
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton
theorem mem_restrict_range {r : β} {s : Set α} {f : α →ₛ β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
r ∈ (restrict f s).range ↔ r = 0 ∧ s ≠ univ ∨ r ∈ f '' s := by
rw [← Finset.mem_coe, coe_range, coe_restrict _ hs, mem_range_indicator]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_restrict_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_restrict_range
theorem mem_image_of_mem_range_restrict {r : β} {s : Set α} {f : α →ₛ β}
(hr : r ∈ (restrict f s).range) (h0 : r ≠ 0) : r ∈ f '' s :=
if hs : MeasurableSet s then by simpa [mem_restrict_range hs, h0, -mem_range] using hr
else by
rw [restrict_of_not_measurable hs] at hr
exact (h0 <| eq_zero_of_mem_range_zero hr).elim
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_image_of_mem_range_restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_image_of_mem_range_restrict
@[mono]
theorem restrict_mono [Preorder β] (s : Set α) {f g : α →ₛ β} (H : f ≤ g) :
f.restrict s ≤ g.restrict s :=
if hs : MeasurableSet s then fun x => by
simp only [coe_restrict _ hs, indicator_le_indicator (H x)]
else by simp only [restrict_of_not_measurable hs, le_refl]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_mono MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_mono
end Restrict
section Approx
section
variable [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] [Zero β]
/-- Fix a sequence `i : ℕ → β`. Given a function `α → β`, its `n`-th approximation
by simple functions is defined so that in case `β = ℝ≥0∞` it sends each `a` to the supremum
of the set `{i k | k ≤ n ∧ i k ≤ f a}`, see `approx_apply` and `iSup_approx_apply` for details. -/
def approx (i : ℕ → β) (f : α → β) (n : ℕ) : α →ₛ β :=
(Finset.range n).sup fun k => restrict (const α (i k)) { a : α | i k ≤ f a }
#align measure_theory.simple_func.approx MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approx
theorem approx_apply [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderClosedTopology β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[OpensMeasurableSpace β] {i : ℕ → β} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ} (a : α) (hf : Measurable f) :
(approx i f n : α →ₛ β) a = (Finset.range n).sup fun k => if i k ≤ f a then i k else 0 := by
dsimp only [approx]
rw [finset_sup_apply]
congr
funext k
rw [restrict_apply]
· simp only [coe_const, mem_setOf_eq, indicator_apply, Function.const_apply]
· exact hf measurableSet_Ici
#align measure_theory.simple_func.approx_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approx_apply
theorem monotone_approx (i : ℕ → β) (f : α → β) : Monotone (approx i f) := fun _ _ h =>
Finset.sup_mono <| Finset.range_subset.2 h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.monotone_approx MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.monotone_approx
theorem approx_comp [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderClosedTopology β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[OpensMeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] {i : ℕ → β} {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} {n : ℕ} (a : α)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
(approx i (f ∘ g) n : α →ₛ β) a = (approx i f n : γ →ₛ β) (g a) := by
rw [approx_apply _ hf, approx_apply _ (hf.comp hg), Function.comp_apply]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.approx_comp MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approx_comp
end
theorem iSup_approx_apply [TopologicalSpace β] [CompleteLattice β] [OrderClosedTopology β] [Zero β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (i : ℕ → β) (f : α → β) (a : α) (hf : Measurable f)
(h_zero : (0 : β) = ⊥) : ⨆ n, (approx i f n : α →ₛ β) a = ⨆ (k) (_ : i k ≤ f a), i k := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun n => ?_) (iSup_le fun k => iSup_le fun hk => ?_)
· rw [approx_apply a hf, h_zero]
refine Finset.sup_le fun k _ => ?_
split_ifs with h
· exact le_iSup_of_le k (le_iSup (fun _ : i k ≤ f a => i k) h)
· exact bot_le
· refine le_iSup_of_le (k + 1) ?_
rw [approx_apply a hf]
have : k ∈ Finset.range (k + 1) := Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
refine le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) (Finset.le_sup this)
rw [if_pos hk]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.supr_approx_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.iSup_approx_apply
end Approx
section EApprox
/-- A sequence of `ℝ≥0∞`s such that its range is the set of non-negative rational numbers. -/
def ennrealRatEmbed (n : ℕ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
ENNReal.ofReal ((Encodable.decode (α := ℚ) n).getD (0 : ℚ))
#align measure_theory.simple_func.ennreal_rat_embed MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ennrealRatEmbed
theorem ennrealRatEmbed_encode (q : ℚ) :
ennrealRatEmbed (Encodable.encode q) = Real.toNNReal q := by
rw [ennrealRatEmbed, Encodable.encodek]; rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.ennreal_rat_embed_encode MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ennrealRatEmbed_encode
/-- Approximate a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` by a sequence of simple functions. -/
def eapprox : (α → ℝ≥0∞) → ℕ → α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ :=
approx ennrealRatEmbed
#align measure_theory.simple_func.eapprox MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.eapprox
theorem eapprox_lt_top (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : eapprox f n a < ∞ := by
simp only [eapprox, approx, finset_sup_apply, Finset.mem_range, ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, restrict]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff (α := ℝ≥0∞) WithTop.zero_lt_top]
intro b _
split_ifs
· simp only [coe_zero, coe_piecewise, piecewise_eq_indicator, coe_const]
calc
{ a : α | ennrealRatEmbed b ≤ f a }.indicator (fun _ => ennrealRatEmbed b) a ≤
ennrealRatEmbed b :=
indicator_le_self _ _ a
_ < ⊤ := ENNReal.coe_lt_top
· exact WithTop.zero_lt_top
#align measure_theory.simple_func.eapprox_lt_top MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.eapprox_lt_top
@[mono]
theorem monotone_eapprox (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : Monotone (eapprox f) :=
monotone_approx _ f
#align measure_theory.simple_func.monotone_eapprox MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.monotone_eapprox
theorem iSup_eapprox_apply (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) a = f a := by
rw [eapprox, iSup_approx_apply ennrealRatEmbed f a hf rfl]
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun hi => hi) (le_of_not_gt ?_)
intro h
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h with ⟨q, _, lt_q, q_lt⟩
have :
(Real.toNNReal q : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ⨆ (k : ℕ) (_ : ennrealRatEmbed k ≤ f a), ennrealRatEmbed k := by
refine le_iSup_of_le (Encodable.encode q) ?_
rw [ennrealRatEmbed_encode q]
exact le_iSup_of_le (le_of_lt q_lt) le_rfl
exact lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_le_of_lt this lt_q)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.supr_eapprox_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.iSup_eapprox_apply
theorem eapprox_comp [MeasurableSpace γ] {f : γ → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → γ} {n : ℕ} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : (eapprox (f ∘ g) n : α → ℝ≥0∞) = (eapprox f n : γ →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) ∘ g :=
funext fun a => approx_comp a hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.eapprox_comp MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.eapprox_comp
/-- Approximate a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` by a series of simple functions taking their values
in `ℝ≥0`. -/
def eapproxDiff (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℕ → α →ₛ ℝ≥0
| 0 => (eapprox f 0).map ENNReal.toNNReal
| n + 1 => (eapprox f (n + 1) - eapprox f n).map ENNReal.toNNReal
#align measure_theory.simple_func.eapprox_diff MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff
theorem sum_eapproxDiff (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(∑ k ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (eapproxDiff f k a : ℝ≥0∞)) = eapprox f n a := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.zero_add, Finset.sum_singleton, Finset.range_one]
rfl
· erw [Finset.sum_range_succ, IH, eapproxDiff, coe_map, Function.comp_apply,
coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le (monotone_eapprox f (Nat.le_succ _) _)]
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt _ (eapprox_lt_top f (n + 1) a)).ne
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
exact le_self_add
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sum_eapprox_diff MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sum_eapproxDiff
theorem tsum_eapproxDiff (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
(∑' n, (eapproxDiff f n a : ℝ≥0∞)) = f a := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat' (tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1), sum_eapproxDiff,
iSup_eapprox_apply f hf a]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.tsum_eapprox_diff MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.tsum_eapproxDiff
end EApprox
end Measurable
section Measure
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- Integral of a simple function whose codomain is `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
def lintegral {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∑ x ∈ f.range, x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x})
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral
theorem lintegral_eq_of_subset (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Finset ℝ≥0∞}
(hs : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {f x}) ≠ 0 → f x ∈ s) :
f.lintegral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) := by
refine Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero (fun r _ _ => r) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [forall_mem_range, mul_ne_zero_iff, and_imp]
· intros
assumption
· intro b _ hb
refine ⟨b, ?_, hb, rfl⟩
rw [mem_range, ← preimage_singleton_nonempty]
exact nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero_iff.1 hb).2
· intros
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_of_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_of_subset
theorem lintegral_eq_of_subset' (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Finset ℝ≥0∞} (hs : f.range \ {0} ⊆ s) :
f.lintegral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
f.lintegral_eq_of_subset fun x hfx _ =>
hs <| Finset.mem_sdiff.2 ⟨f.mem_range_self x, mt Finset.mem_singleton.1 hfx⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_of_subset' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_of_subset'
/-- Calculate the integral of `(g ∘ f)`, where `g : β → ℝ≥0∞` and `f : α →ₛ β`. -/
theorem map_lintegral (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) (f : α →ₛ β) :
(f.map g).lintegral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, g x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) := by
simp only [lintegral, range_map]
refine Finset.sum_image' _ fun b hb => ?_
rcases mem_range.1 hb with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [map_preimage_singleton, ← f.sum_measure_preimage_singleton, Finset.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ ?_
· congr
· intro x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter]
rintro ⟨_, h⟩
rw [h]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_lintegral
theorem add_lintegral (f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : (f + g).lintegral μ = f.lintegral μ + g.lintegral μ :=
calc
(f + g).lintegral μ =
∑ x ∈ (pair f g).range, (x.1 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x}) + x.2 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x})) := by
rw [add_eq_map₂, map_lintegral]; exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun a _ => add_mul _ _ _
_ = (∑ x ∈ (pair f g).range, x.1 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x})) +
∑ x ∈ (pair f g).range, x.2 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x}) := by
rw [Finset.sum_add_distrib]
_ = ((pair f g).map Prod.fst).lintegral μ + ((pair f g).map Prod.snd).lintegral μ := by
rw [map_lintegral, map_lintegral]
_ = lintegral f μ + lintegral g μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.add_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.add_lintegral
theorem const_mul_lintegral (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (x : ℝ≥0∞) :
(const α x * f).lintegral μ = x * f.lintegral μ :=
calc
(f.map fun a => x * a).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, x * r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r}) := map_lintegral _ _
_ = x * ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r}) := by simp_rw [Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_mul_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral
/-- Integral of a simple function `α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞` as a bilinear map. -/
def lintegralₗ {m : MeasurableSpace α} : (α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := lintegral f
map_add' := by simp [lintegral, mul_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
map_smul' := fun c μ => by
simp [lintegral, mul_left_comm _ c, Finset.mul_sum, Measure.smul_apply c] }
map_add' f g := LinearMap.ext fun μ => add_lintegral f g
map_smul' c f := LinearMap.ext fun μ => const_mul_lintegral f c
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegralₗ MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegralₗ
@[simp]
theorem zero_lintegral : (0 : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞).lintegral μ = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext_iff.1 lintegralₗ.map_zero μ
#align measure_theory.simple_func.zero_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.zero_lintegral
theorem lintegral_add {ν} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : f.lintegral (μ + ν) = f.lintegral μ + f.lintegral ν :=
(lintegralₗ f).map_add μ ν
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_add
theorem lintegral_smul (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : f.lintegral (c • μ) = c • f.lintegral μ :=
(lintegralₗ f).map_smul c μ
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : f.lintegral 0 = 0 :=
(lintegralₗ f).map_zero
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_sum {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
f.lintegral (Measure.sum μ) = ∑' i, f.lintegral (μ i) := by
simp only [lintegral, Measure.sum_apply, f.measurableSet_preimage, ← Finset.tsum_subtype, ←
ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
apply ENNReal.tsum_comm
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_sum MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum
theorem restrict_lintegral (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(restrict f s).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r} ∩ s) :=
calc
(restrict f s).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (restrict f s ⁻¹' {r}) :=
lintegral_eq_of_subset _ fun x hx =>
if hxs : x ∈ s then fun _ => by
simp only [f.restrict_apply hs, indicator_of_mem hxs, mem_range_self]
else False.elim <| hx <| by simp [*]
_ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r} ∩ s) :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl <|
forall_mem_range.2 fun b =>
if hb : f b = 0 then by simp only [hb, zero_mul]
else by rw [restrict_preimage_singleton _ hs hb, inter_comm]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_lintegral
theorem lintegral_restrict {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
f.lintegral (μ.restrict s) = ∑ y ∈ f.range, y * μ (f ⁻¹' {y} ∩ s) := by
simp only [lintegral, Measure.restrict_apply, f.measurableSet_preimage]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_restrict
theorem restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (restrict f s).lintegral μ = f.lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [f.restrict_lintegral hs, lintegral_restrict]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict
theorem const_lintegral (c : ℝ≥0∞) : (const α c).lintegral μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [lintegral]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· simp [μ.eq_zero_of_isEmpty]
· simp; unfold Function.const; rw [preimage_const_of_mem (mem_singleton c)]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_lintegral
theorem const_lintegral_restrict (c : ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
(const α c).lintegral (μ.restrict s) = c * μ s := by
rw [const_lintegral, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_lintegral_restrict MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_lintegral_restrict
theorem restrict_const_lintegral (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
((const α c).restrict s).lintegral μ = c * μ s := by
rw [restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, const_lintegral_restrict]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.restrict_const_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.restrict_const_lintegral
theorem le_sup_lintegral (f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : f.lintegral μ ⊔ g.lintegral μ ≤ (f ⊔ g).lintegral μ :=
calc
f.lintegral μ ⊔ g.lintegral μ =
((pair f g).map Prod.fst).lintegral μ ⊔ ((pair f g).map Prod.snd).lintegral μ :=
rfl
_ ≤ ∑ x ∈ (pair f g).range, (x.1 ⊔ x.2) * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x}) := by
rw [map_lintegral, map_lintegral]
refine sup_le ?_ ?_ <;> refine Finset.sum_le_sum fun a _ => mul_le_mul_right' ?_ _
· exact le_sup_left
· exact le_sup_right
_ = (f ⊔ g).lintegral μ := by rw [sup_eq_map₂, map_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.le_sup_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.le_sup_lintegral
/-- `SimpleFunc.lintegral` is monotone both in function and in measure. -/
@[mono]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFunc.lean | 1,118 | 1,124 | theorem lintegral_mono {f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ g) (hμν : μ ≤ ν) :
f.lintegral μ ≤ g.lintegral ν :=
calc
f.lintegral μ ≤ f.lintegral μ ⊔ g.lintegral μ := le_sup_left
_ ≤ (f ⊔ g).lintegral μ := le_sup_lintegral _ _
_ = g.lintegral μ := by | rw [sup_of_le_right hfg]
_ ≤ g.lintegral ν := Finset.sum_le_sum fun y _ => ENNReal.mul_left_mono <| hμν _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Basic
/-!
# Independence with respect to a kernel and a measure
A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is independent with respect to a kernel
`κ : kernel α Ω` and a measure `μ` on `α` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`,
for any sets `f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then for `μ`-almost every `a : α`,
`κ a (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i)`.
This notion of independence is a generalization of both independence and conditional independence.
For conditional independence, `κ` is the conditional kernel `ProbabilityTheory.condexpKernel` and
`μ` is the ambiant measure. For (non-conditional) independence, `κ = kernel.const Unit μ` and the
measure is the Dirac measure on `Unit`.
The main purpose of this file is to prove only once the properties that hold for both conditional
and non-conditional independence.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepSets`: independence of a family of sets of sets.
Variant for two sets of sets: `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepSets`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndep`: independence of a family of σ-algebras. Variant for two
σ-algebras: `Indep`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepSet`: independence of a family of sets. Variant for two sets:
`ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepSet`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepFun`: independence of a family of functions (random variables).
Variant for two functions: `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepFun`.
See the file `Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Basic.lean` for a more detailed discussion of these
definitions in the particular case of the usual independence notion.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepSets.iIndep`: if π-systems are independent as sets of sets,
then the measurable space structures they generate are independent.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepSets.Indep`: variant with two π-systems.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory.kernel
variable {α Ω ι : Type*}
section Definitions
variable {_mα : MeasurableSpace α}
/-- A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is independent with respect to a kernel `κ` and
a measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then `∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i)`.
It will be used for families of pi_systems. -/
def iIndepSets {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
(π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (κ : kernel α Ω) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω} (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i),
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i)
/-- Two sets of sets `s₁, s₂` are independent with respect to a kernel `κ` and a measure `μ` if for
any sets `t₁ ∈ s₁, t₂ ∈ s₂`, then `∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (t₁ ∩ t₂) = κ a (t₁) * κ a (t₂)` -/
def IndepSets {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
(s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (κ : kernel α Ω) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ t1 t2 : Set Ω, t1 ∈ s1 → t2 ∈ s2 → (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (t1 ∩ t2) = κ a t1 * κ a t2)
/-- A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
kernel `κ` and a measure `μ` if the family of sets of measurable sets they define is independent. -/
def iIndep (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
iIndepSets (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) κ μ
/-- Two measurable space structures (or σ-algebras) `m₁, m₂` are independent with respect to a
kernel `κ` and a measure `μ` if for any sets `t₁ ∈ m₁, t₂ ∈ m₂`,
`∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (t₁ ∩ t₂) = κ a (t₁) * κ a (t₂)` -/
def Indep (m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
IndepSets {s | MeasurableSet[m₁] s} {s | MeasurableSet[m₂] s} κ μ
/-- A family of sets is independent if the family of measurable space structures they generate is
independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def iIndepSet {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (s : ι → Set Ω) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
iIndep (fun i ↦ generateFrom {s i}) κ μ
/-- Two sets are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are independent.
For a set `s`, the generated measurable space structure has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def IndepSet {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (s t : Set Ω) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (generateFrom {s}) (generateFrom {t}) κ μ
/-- A family of functions defined on the same space `Ω` and taking values in possibly different
spaces, each with a measurable space structure, is independent if the family of measurable space
structures they generate on `Ω` is independent. For a function `g` with codomain having measurable
space structure `m`, the generated measurable space structure is `MeasurableSpace.comap g m`. -/
def iIndepFun {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {β : ι → Type*} (m : ∀ x : ι, MeasurableSpace (β x))
(f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
iIndep (fun x ↦ MeasurableSpace.comap (f x) (m x)) κ μ
/-- Two functions are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are
independent. For a function `f` with codomain having measurable space structure `m`, the generated
measurable space structure is `MeasurableSpace.comap f m`. -/
def IndepFun {β γ} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [mγ : MeasurableSpace γ]
(f : Ω → β) (g : Ω → γ) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (MeasurableSpace.comap f mβ) (MeasurableSpace.comap g mγ) κ μ
end Definitions
section ByDefinition
variable {β : ι → Type*} {mβ : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (β i)}
{_mα : MeasurableSpace α} {m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α}
{π : ι → Set (Set Ω)} {s : ι → Set Ω} {S : Finset ι} {f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x}
lemma iIndepSets.meas_biInter (h : iIndepSets π κ μ) (s : Finset ι)
{f : ι → Set Ω} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i) := h s hf
lemma iIndepSets.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (h : iIndepSets π κ μ) (hs : ∀ i, s i ∈ π i) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, κ a (s i) := by
filter_upwards [h.meas_biInter Finset.univ (fun _i _ ↦ hs _)] with a ha using by simp [← ha]
lemma iIndep.iIndepSets' (hμ : iIndep m κ μ) :
iIndepSets (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) κ μ := hμ
lemma iIndep.meas_biInter (hμ : iIndep m κ μ) (hs : ∀ i, i ∈ S → MeasurableSet[m i] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ S, s i) = ∏ i ∈ S, κ a (s i) := hμ _ hs
lemma iIndep.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (h : iIndep m κ μ) (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[m i] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, κ a (s i) := by
filter_upwards [h.meas_biInter (fun i (_ : i ∈ Finset.univ) ↦ hs _)] with a ha
simp [← ha]
protected lemma iIndepFun.iIndep (hf : iIndepFun mβ f κ μ) :
iIndep (fun x ↦ (mβ x).comap (f x)) κ μ := hf
lemma iIndepFun.meas_biInter (hf : iIndepFun mβ f κ μ)
(hs : ∀ i, i ∈ S → MeasurableSet[(mβ i).comap (f i)] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ S, s i) = ∏ i ∈ S, κ a (s i) := hf.iIndep.meas_biInter hs
lemma iIndepFun.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (hf : iIndepFun mβ f κ μ)
(hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[(mβ i).comap (f i)] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, κ a (s i) := hf.iIndep.meas_iInter hs
lemma IndepFun.meas_inter {β γ : Type*} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [mγ : MeasurableSpace γ]
{f : Ω → β} {g : Ω → γ} (hfg : IndepFun f g κ μ)
{s t : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[mβ.comap f] s) (ht : MeasurableSet[mγ.comap g] t) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (s ∩ t) = κ a s * κ a t := hfg _ _ hs ht
end ByDefinition
section Indep
variable {_mα : MeasurableSpace α}
@[symm]
theorem IndepSets.symm {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α}
{s₁ s₂ : Set (Set Ω)} (h : IndepSets s₁ s₂ κ μ) :
IndepSets s₂ s₁ κ μ := by
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2
filter_upwards [h t2 t1 ht2 ht1] with a ha
rwa [Set.inter_comm, mul_comm]
@[symm]
theorem Indep.symm {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {κ : kernel α Ω}
{μ : Measure α} (h : Indep m₁ m₂ κ μ) :
Indep m₂ m₁ κ μ :=
IndepSets.symm h
theorem indep_bot_right (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} [IsMarkovKernel κ] :
Indep m' ⊥ κ μ := by
intros s t _ ht
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_bot_iff] at ht
refine Filter.eventually_of_forall (fun a ↦ ?_)
cases' ht with ht ht
· rw [ht, Set.inter_empty, measure_empty, mul_zero]
· rw [ht, Set.inter_univ, measure_univ, mul_one]
theorem indep_bot_left (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} [IsMarkovKernel κ] :
Indep ⊥ m' κ μ := (indep_bot_right m').symm
theorem indepSet_empty_right {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} [IsMarkovKernel κ] (s : Set Ω) :
IndepSet s ∅ κ μ := by
simp only [IndepSet, generateFrom_singleton_empty];
exact indep_bot_right _
theorem indepSet_empty_left {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {κ : kernel α Ω}
{μ : Measure α} [IsMarkovKernel κ] (s : Set Ω) :
IndepSet ∅ s κ μ :=
(indepSet_empty_right s).symm
theorem indepSets_of_indepSets_of_le_left {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set (Set Ω)} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} (h_indep : IndepSets s₁ s₂ κ μ) (h31 : s₃ ⊆ s₁) :
IndepSets s₃ s₂ κ μ :=
fun t1 t2 ht1 ht2 => h_indep t1 t2 (Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem h31 ht1) ht2
theorem indepSets_of_indepSets_of_le_right {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set (Set Ω)} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} (h_indep : IndepSets s₁ s₂ κ μ) (h32 : s₃ ⊆ s₂) :
IndepSets s₁ s₃ κ μ :=
fun t1 t2 ht1 ht2 => h_indep t1 t2 ht1 (Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem h32 ht2)
theorem indep_of_indep_of_le_left {m₁ m₂ m₃ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} (h_indep : Indep m₁ m₂ κ μ) (h31 : m₃ ≤ m₁) :
Indep m₃ m₂ κ μ :=
fun t1 t2 ht1 ht2 => h_indep t1 t2 (h31 _ ht1) ht2
theorem indep_of_indep_of_le_right {m₁ m₂ m₃ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} (h_indep : Indep m₁ m₂ κ μ) (h32 : m₃ ≤ m₂) :
Indep m₁ m₃ κ μ :=
fun t1 t2 ht1 ht2 => h_indep t1 t2 ht1 (h32 _ ht2)
| Mathlib/Probability/Independence/Kernel.lean | 224 | 231 | theorem IndepSets.union {s₁ s₂ s' : Set (Set Ω)} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α}
(h₁ : IndepSets s₁ s' κ μ) (h₂ : IndepSets s₂ s' κ μ) :
IndepSets (s₁ ∪ s₂) s' κ μ := by |
intro t1 t2 ht1 ht2
cases' (Set.mem_union _ _ _).mp ht1 with ht1₁ ht1₂
· exact h₁ t1 t2 ht1₁ ht2
· exact h₂ t1 t2 ht1₂ ht2
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import linear_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
/-!
# Linear algebra
This file defines the basics of linear algebra. It sets up the "categorical/lattice structure" of
modules over a ring, submodules, and linear maps.
Many of the relevant definitions, including `Module`, `Submodule`, and `LinearMap`, are found in
`Algebra/Module`.
## Main definitions
* Many constructors for (semi)linear maps
See `LinearAlgebra.Span` for the span of a set (as a submodule),
and `LinearAlgebra.Quotient` for quotients by submodules.
## Main theorems
See `LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms` for Noether's three isomorphism theorems for modules.
## Notations
* We continue to use the notations `M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` and `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of semilinear
(resp. linear) maps from `M` to `M₂` over the ring homomorphism `σ` (resp. over the ring `R`).
## Implementation notes
We note that, when constructing linear maps, it is convenient to use operations defined on bundled
maps (`LinearMap.prod`, `LinearMap.coprod`, arithmetic operations like `+`) instead of defining a
function and proving it is linear.
## TODO
* Parts of this file have not yet been generalized to semilinear maps
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module
-/
open Function
open Pointwise
variable {R : Type*} {R₁ : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*} {R₄ : Type*}
variable {S : Type*}
variable {K : Type*} {K₂ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M' : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*} {M₄ : Type*}
variable {N : Type*} {N₂ : Type*}
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
/-! ### Properties of linear maps -/
namespace IsLinearMap
theorem isLinearMap_add [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
IsLinearMap R fun x : M × M => x.1 + x.2 := by
apply IsLinearMap.mk
· intro x y
simp only [Prod.fst_add, Prod.snd_add]
abel -- Porting Note: was cc
· intro x y
simp [smul_add]
#align is_linear_map.is_linear_map_add IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_add
theorem isLinearMap_sub {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
IsLinearMap R fun x : M × M => x.1 - x.2 := by
apply IsLinearMap.mk
· intro x y
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]`
rw [Prod.fst_add, Prod.snd_add]
abel
· intro x y
simp [smul_sub]
#align is_linear_map.is_linear_map_sub IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_sub
end IsLinearMap
/-! ### Linear equivalences -/
namespace LinearEquiv
section AddCommMonoid
#align linear_equiv.map_sum map_sumₓ
section
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃] [Semiring R₄]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
variable {module_M : Module R M} {module_M₂ : Module R₂ M₂} {module_M₃ : Module R₃ M₃}
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R}
variable {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃} [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable {σ₃₂ : R₃ →+* R₂}
variable {re₁₂ : RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁} {re₂₁ : RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂}
variable {re₂₃ : RingHomInvPair σ₂₃ σ₃₂} {re₃₂ : RingHomInvPair σ₃₂ σ₂₃}
variable (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₁] M) (e : M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (h : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃)
variable (e'' : M₂ ≃ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃)
variable (p q : Submodule R M)
/-- Linear equivalence between two equal submodules. -/
def ofEq (h : p = q) : p ≃ₗ[R] q :=
{ Equiv.Set.ofEq (congr_arg _ h) with
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align linear_equiv.of_eq LinearEquiv.ofEq
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofEq_apply (h : p = q) (x : p) : (ofEq p q h x : M) = x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_of_eq_apply LinearEquiv.coe_ofEq_apply
@[simp]
theorem ofEq_symm (h : p = q) : (ofEq p q h).symm = ofEq q p h.symm :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_eq_symm LinearEquiv.ofEq_symm
@[simp]
theorem ofEq_rfl : ofEq p p rfl = LinearEquiv.refl R p := by ext; rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_eq_rfl LinearEquiv.ofEq_rfl
/-- A linear equivalence which maps a submodule of one module onto another, restricts to a linear
equivalence of the two submodules. -/
def ofSubmodules (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) (h : p.map (e : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) = q) :
p ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] q :=
(e.submoduleMap p).trans (LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ h)
#align linear_equiv.of_submodules LinearEquiv.ofSubmodules
@[simp]
theorem ofSubmodules_apply {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂} (h : p.map ↑e = q) (x : p) :
↑(e.ofSubmodules p q h x) = e x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_submodules_apply LinearEquiv.ofSubmodules_apply
@[simp]
theorem ofSubmodules_symm_apply {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂} (h : p.map ↑e = q)
(x : q) : ↑((e.ofSubmodules p q h).symm x) = e.symm x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_submodules_symm_apply LinearEquiv.ofSubmodules_symm_apply
/-- A linear equivalence of two modules restricts to a linear equivalence from the preimage of any
submodule to that submodule.
This is `LinearEquiv.ofSubmodule` but with `comap` on the left instead of `map` on the right. -/
def ofSubmodule' [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] (f : M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (U : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
U.comap (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] U :=
(f.symm.ofSubmodules _ _ f.symm.map_eq_comap).symm
#align linear_equiv.of_submodule' LinearEquiv.ofSubmodule'
theorem ofSubmodule'_toLinearMap [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] (f : M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)
(U : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(f.ofSubmodule' U).toLinearMap = (f.toLinearMap.domRestrict _).codRestrict _ Subtype.prop := by
ext
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_submodule'_to_linear_map LinearEquiv.ofSubmodule'_toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem ofSubmodule'_apply [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] (f : M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (U : Submodule R₂ M₂)
(x : U.comap (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)) : (f.ofSubmodule' U x : M₂) = f (x : M) :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_submodule'_apply LinearEquiv.ofSubmodule'_apply
@[simp]
theorem ofSubmodule'_symm_apply [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] (f : M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)
(U : Submodule R₂ M₂) (x : U) : ((f.ofSubmodule' U).symm x : M) = f.symm (x : M₂) :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_submodule'_symm_apply LinearEquiv.ofSubmodule'_symm_apply
variable (p)
/-- The top submodule of `M` is linearly equivalent to `M`. -/
def ofTop (h : p = ⊤) : p ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ p.subtype with
invFun := fun x => ⟨x, h.symm ▸ trivial⟩
left_inv := fun _ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl }
#align linear_equiv.of_top LinearEquiv.ofTop
@[simp]
theorem ofTop_apply {h} (x : p) : ofTop p h x = x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_top_apply LinearEquiv.ofTop_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofTop_symm_apply {h} (x : M) : ((ofTop p h).symm x : M) = x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_of_top_symm_apply LinearEquiv.coe_ofTop_symm_apply
theorem ofTop_symm_apply {h} (x : M) : (ofTop p h).symm x = ⟨x, h.symm ▸ trivial⟩ :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_top_symm_apply LinearEquiv.ofTop_symm_apply
@[simp]
protected theorem range : LinearMap.range (e : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) = ⊤ :=
LinearMap.range_eq_top.2 e.toEquiv.surjective
#align linear_equiv.range LinearEquiv.range
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.LinearEquivClass.range [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] {F : Type*}
[EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearEquivClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] (e : F) : LinearMap.range e = ⊤ :=
LinearMap.range_eq_top.2 (EquivLike.surjective e)
#align linear_equiv_class.range LinearEquivClass.range
theorem eq_bot_of_equiv [Module R₂ M₂] (e : p ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] (⊥ : Submodule R₂ M₂)) : p = ⊥ := by
refine bot_unique (SetLike.le_def.2 fun b hb => (Submodule.mem_bot R).2 ?_)
rw [← p.mk_eq_zero hb, ← e.map_eq_zero_iff]
apply Submodule.eq_zero_of_bot_submodule
#align linear_equiv.eq_bot_of_equiv LinearEquiv.eq_bot_of_equiv
-- Porting note: `RingHomSurjective σ₁₂` is an unused argument.
@[simp]
theorem range_comp [RingHomSurjective σ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective σ₁₃] :
LinearMap.range (h.comp (e : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) = LinearMap.range h :=
LinearMap.range_comp_of_range_eq_top _ e.range
#align linear_equiv.range_comp LinearEquiv.range_comp
variable {f g}
/-- A linear map `f : M →ₗ[R] M₂` with a left-inverse `g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M` defines a linear
equivalence between `M` and `f.range`.
This is a computable alternative to `LinearEquiv.ofInjective`, and a bidirectional version of
`LinearMap.rangeRestrict`. -/
def ofLeftInverse [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂] {g : M₂ → M}
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) : M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] (LinearMap.range f) :=
{ LinearMap.rangeRestrict f with
toFun := LinearMap.rangeRestrict f
invFun := g ∘ (LinearMap.range f).subtype
left_inv := h
right_inv := fun x =>
Subtype.ext <|
let ⟨x', hx'⟩ := LinearMap.mem_range.mp x.prop
show f (g x) = x by rw [← hx', h x'] }
#align linear_equiv.of_left_inverse LinearEquiv.ofLeftInverse
@[simp]
theorem ofLeftInverse_apply [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂]
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (x : M) : ↑(ofLeftInverse h x) = f x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_left_inverse_apply LinearEquiv.ofLeftInverse_apply
@[simp]
theorem ofLeftInverse_symm_apply [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂]
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (x : LinearMap.range f) : (ofLeftInverse h).symm x = g x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_left_inverse_symm_apply LinearEquiv.ofLeftInverse_symm_apply
variable (f)
/-- An `Injective` linear map `f : M →ₗ[R] M₂` defines a linear equivalence
between `M` and `f.range`. See also `LinearMap.ofLeftInverse`. -/
noncomputable def ofInjective [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂] (h : Injective f) :
M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] LinearMap.range f :=
ofLeftInverse <| Classical.choose_spec h.hasLeftInverse
#align linear_equiv.of_injective LinearEquiv.ofInjective
@[simp]
theorem ofInjective_apply [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂] {h : Injective f}
(x : M) : ↑(ofInjective f h x) = f x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_injective_apply LinearEquiv.ofInjective_apply
/-- A bijective linear map is a linear equivalence. -/
noncomputable def ofBijective [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂] (hf : Bijective f) :
M ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂ :=
(ofInjective f hf.injective).trans (ofTop _ <| LinearMap.range_eq_top.2 hf.surjective)
#align linear_equiv.of_bijective LinearEquiv.ofBijective
@[simp]
theorem ofBijective_apply [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂] {hf} (x : M) :
ofBijective f hf x = f x :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.of_bijective_apply LinearEquiv.ofBijective_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Basic.lean | 295 | 297 | theorem ofBijective_symm_apply_apply [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂] {h} (x : M) :
(ofBijective f h).symm (f x) = x := by |
simp [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
/-!
# Verification of the `Ordnode α` datatype
This file proves the correctness of the operations in `Data.Ordmap.Ordnode`.
The public facing version is the type `Ordset α`, which is a wrapper around
`Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type, and it exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same
thing but bundle the correctness proofs. The advantage is that it is possible
to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert` will actually find
the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`
## Implementation notes
The majority of this file is actually in the `Ordnode` namespace, because we first
have to prove the correctness of all the operations (and defining what correctness
means here is actually somewhat subtle). So all the actual `Ordset` operations are
at the very end, once we have all the theorems.
An `Ordnode α` is an inductive type which describes a tree which stores the `size` at
internal nodes. The correctness invariant of an `Ordnode α` is:
* `Ordnode.Sized t`: All internal `size` fields must match the actual measured
size of the tree. (This is not hard to satisfy.)
* `Ordnode.Balanced t`: Unless the tree has the form `()` or `((a) b)` or `(a (b))`
(that is, nil or a single singleton subtree), the two subtrees must satisfy
`size l ≤ δ * size r` and `size r ≤ δ * size l`, where `δ := 3` is a global
parameter of the data structure (and this property must hold recursively at subtrees).
This is why we say this is a "size balanced tree" data structure.
* `Ordnode.Bounded lo hi t`: The members of the tree must be in strictly increasing order,
meaning that if `a` is in the left subtree and `b` is the root, then `a ≤ b` and
`¬ (b ≤ a)`. We enforce this using `Ordnode.Bounded` which includes also a global
upper and lower bound.
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
**Note:** This file is incomplete, in the sense that the intent is to have verified
versions and lemmas about all the definitions in `Ordnode.lean`, but at the moment only
a few operations are verified (the hard part should be out of the way, but still).
Contributors are encouraged to pick this up and finish the job, if it appeals to you.
## Tags
ordered map, ordered set, data structure, verified programming
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
/-! ### delta and ratio -/
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
/-! ### `singleton` -/
/-! ### `size` and `empty` -/
/-- O(n). Computes the actual number of elements in the set, ignoring the cached `size` field. -/
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
/-! ### `Sized` -/
/-- The `Sized` property asserts that all the `size` fields in nodes match the actual size of the
respective subtrees. -/
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
/-! `dual` -/
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
/-! `Balanced` -/
/-- The `BalancedSz l r` asserts that a hypothetical tree with children of sizes `l` and `r` is
balanced: either `l ≤ δ * r` and `r ≤ δ * r`, or the tree is trivial with a singleton on one side
and nothing on the other. -/
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
/-- The `Balanced t` asserts that the tree `t` satisfies the balance invariants
(at every level). -/
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
/-! ### `rotate` and `balance` -/
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, left associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, right associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> (a ()) b` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> a (() b)` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a left rotation `x (y z) -> ((x y) z)`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a right rotation `(x y) z -> (x (y z))`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- A left balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
/-- A right balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
/-- The full balance operation. This is the same as `balance`, but with less manual inlining.
It is somewhat easier to work with this version in proofs. -/
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
/-! ## `All`, `Any`, `Emem`, `Amem` -/
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
/-! ### `toList` -/
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
#align ordnode.length_to_list Ordnode.length_toList
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} (h₁ : Sized t₁) (h₂ : Sized t₂) :
Equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ toList t₁ = toList t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => by rw [← length_toList h₁, h, length_toList h₂]
#align ordnode.equiv_iff Ordnode.equiv_iff
/-! ### `mem` -/
theorem pos_size_of_mem [LE α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {x : α} {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by cases t; · { contradiction }; · { simp [h.1] }
#align ordnode.pos_size_of_mem Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem
/-! ### `(find/erase/split)(Min/Max)` -/
theorem findMin'_dual : ∀ (t) (x : α), findMin' (dual t) x = findMax' x t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node _ _ x r, _ => findMin'_dual r x
#align ordnode.find_min'_dual Ordnode.findMin'_dual
theorem findMax'_dual (t) (x : α) : findMax' x (dual t) = findMin' t x := by
rw [← findMin'_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max'_dual Ordnode.findMax'_dual
theorem findMin_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, findMin (dual t) = findMax t
| nil => rfl
| node _ _ _ _ => congr_arg some <| findMin'_dual _ _
#align ordnode.find_min_dual Ordnode.findMin_dual
theorem findMax_dual (t : Ordnode α) : findMax (dual t) = findMin t := by
rw [← findMin_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max_dual Ordnode.findMax_dual
theorem dual_eraseMin : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (eraseMin t) = eraseMax (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ nil x r => rfl
| node _ (node sz l' y r') x r => by
rw [eraseMin, dual_balanceR, dual_eraseMin (node sz l' y r'), dual, dual, dual, eraseMax]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_min Ordnode.dual_eraseMin
theorem dual_eraseMax (t : Ordnode α) : dual (eraseMax t) = eraseMin (dual t) := by
rw [← dual_dual (eraseMin _), dual_eraseMin, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_max Ordnode.dual_eraseMax
theorem splitMin_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMin' l x r = (findMin' l x, eraseMin (node s l x r))
| _, nil, x, r => rfl
| _, node ls ll lx lr, x, r => by rw [splitMin', splitMin_eq ls ll lx lr, findMin', eraseMin]
#align ordnode.split_min_eq Ordnode.splitMin_eq
theorem splitMax_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMax' l x r = (eraseMax (node s l x r), findMax' x r)
| _, l, x, nil => rfl
| _, l, x, node ls ll lx lr => by rw [splitMax', splitMax_eq ls ll lx lr, findMax', eraseMax]
#align ordnode.split_max_eq Ordnode.splitMax_eq
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMin'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (t) (x : α), All P t → P x → P (findMin' t x)
| nil, _x, _, hx => hx
| node _ ll lx _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂, _⟩, _ => findMin'_all ll lx h₁ h₂
#align ordnode.find_min'_all Ordnode.findMin'_all
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMax'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (x : α) (t), P x → All P t → P (findMax' x t)
| _x, nil, hx, _ => hx
| _, node _ _ lx lr, _, ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩ => findMax'_all lx lr h₂ h₃
#align ordnode.find_max'_all Ordnode.findMax'_all
/-! ### `glue` -/
/-! ### `merge` -/
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_left (t : Ordnode α) : merge t nil = t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_left Ordnode.merge_nil_left
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_right (t : Ordnode α) : merge nil t = t :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_right Ordnode.merge_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem merge_node {ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr} :
merge (@node α ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) =
if delta * ls < rs then balanceL (merge (node ls ll lx lr) rl) rx rr
else if delta * rs < ls then balanceR ll lx (merge lr (node rs rl rx rr))
else glue (node ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_node Ordnode.merge_node
/-! ### `insert` -/
theorem dual_insert [Preorder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) :
∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (Ordnode.insert x t) = @Ordnode.insert αᵒᵈ _ _ x (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
have : @cmpLE αᵒᵈ _ _ x y = cmpLE y x := rfl
rw [Ordnode.insert, dual, Ordnode.insert, this, ← cmpLE_swap x y]
cases cmpLE x y <;>
simp [Ordering.swap, Ordnode.insert, dual_balanceL, dual_balanceR, dual_insert]
#align ordnode.dual_insert Ordnode.dual_insert
/-! ### `balance` properties -/
theorem balance_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r) : @balance α l x r = balance' l x r := by
cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· rw [sr.eq_node'] at hr ⊢
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr <;> cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size rrl = 0 ∧ size rrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm
rwa [size, sr.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rrs = 1 := sr.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size rll = 0 ∧ size rlr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1
rwa [size, sr.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rls = 1 := sr.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [zero_add, if_neg, if_pos, rotateL]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node']; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.2.1.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sr.2.1.pos sr.2.2.pos))
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rw [sl.eq_node'] at hl ⊢
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size lrl = 0 ∧ size lrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm
rwa [size, sl.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lrs = 1 := sl.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size lll = 0 ∧ size llr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1
rwa [size, sl.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lls = 1 := sl.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node']; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.2.2.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· apply Nat.not_lt_zero
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sl.2.1.pos sl.2.2.pos))
· simp [balance, balance']
symm; rw [if_neg]
· split_ifs with h h_1
· have rd : delta ≤ size rl + size rr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sl.pos) h
rwa [sr.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr
· rw [size, zero_add] at rd
exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr
· exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateL]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node', sr.1]; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.1, sr.2.1.1]; abel
· have ld : delta ≤ size ll + size lr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sr.pos) h_1
rwa [sl.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr
· rw [size, zero_add] at ld
exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr
· exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateR]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node', sl.1]; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.1, sl.2.2.1]; abel
· simp [node']
· exact not_le_of_gt (add_le_add (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sl.pos) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sr.pos))
#align ordnode.balance_eq_balance' Ordnode.balance_eq_balance'
theorem balanceL_eq_balance {l x r} (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r) (H1 : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l) :
@balanceL α l x r = balance l x r := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· have : size rl = 0 ∧ size rr = 0 := by
have := H1 rfl
rwa [size, sr.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
rw [sr.eq_node']; rfl
· replace H2 : ¬rs > delta * ls := not_lt_of_le (H2 sl.pos sr.pos)
simp [balanceL, balance, H2]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance
/-- `Raised n m` means `m` is either equal or one up from `n`. -/
def Raised (n m : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n ∨ m = n + 1
#align ordnode.raised Ordnode.Raised
theorem raised_iff {n m} : Raised n m ↔ n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n + 1 := by
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, Nat.le_succ _⟩
· exact ⟨Nat.le_succ _, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (le_antisymm h₂ h₁)
#align ordnode.raised_iff Ordnode.raised_iff
theorem Raised.dist_le {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist n m ≤ 1 := by
cases' raised_iff.1 H with H1 H2; rwa [Nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le H1, tsub_le_iff_left]
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le Ordnode.Raised.dist_le
theorem Raised.dist_le' {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist m n ≤ 1 := by
rw [Nat.dist_comm]; exact H.dist_le
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le' Ordnode.Raised.dist_le'
theorem Raised.add_left (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (k + n) (k + m) := by
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.add_left Ordnode.Raised.add_left
theorem Raised.add_right (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (n + k) (m + k) := by
rw [add_comm, add_comm m]; exact H.add_left _
#align ordnode.raised.add_right Ordnode.Raised.add_right
theorem Raised.right {l x₁ x₂ r₁ r₂} (H : Raised (size r₁) (size r₂)) :
Raised (size (@node' α l x₁ r₁)) (size (@node' α l x₂ r₂)) := by
rw [node', size_node, size_node]; generalize size r₂ = m at H ⊢
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.right Ordnode.Raised.right
theorem balanceL_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceL α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← balance_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr, balanceL_eq_balance sl sr]
· intro l0; rw [l0] at H
rcases H with (⟨_, ⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm
exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 (balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm)
· intro l1 _
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩ | ⟨r', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) H) (mul_pos (by decide) l1 : (0 : ℕ) < _)
· exact le_trans H₂ (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (raised_iff.1 e).1)
· cases raised_iff.1 e; unfold delta; omega
· exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 H₂
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance'
theorem balance_sz_dual {l r}
(H : (∃ l', Raised (@size α l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (@size α r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size (dual r)) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size (dual l))) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size (dual l)) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size (dual r)) r' := by
rw [size_dual, size_dual]
exact
H.symm.imp (Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
(Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
#align ordnode.balance_sz_dual Ordnode.balance_sz_dual
theorem size_balanceL {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
#align ordnode.size_balance_l Ordnode.size_balanceL
theorem all_balanceL {P l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
All P (@balanceL α l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
#align ordnode.all_balance_l Ordnode.all_balanceL
theorem balanceR_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceR α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceR l x r), dual_balanceR,
balanceL_eq_balance' hr.dual hl.dual sr.dual sl.dual (balance_sz_dual H), ← dual_balance',
dual_dual]
#align ordnode.balance_r_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceR_eq_balance'
theorem size_balanceR {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [balanceR_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
#align ordnode.size_balance_r Ordnode.size_balanceR
theorem all_balanceR {P l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
All P (@balanceR α l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balanceR_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
#align ordnode.all_balance_r Ordnode.all_balanceR
/-! ### `bounded` -/
section
variable [Preorder α]
/-- `Bounded t lo hi` says that every element `x ∈ t` is in the range `lo < x < hi`, and also this
property holds recursively in subtrees, making the full tree a BST. The bounds can be set to
`lo = ⊥` and `hi = ⊤` if we care only about the internal ordering constraints. -/
def Bounded : Ordnode α → WithBot α → WithTop α → Prop
| nil, some a, some b => a < b
| nil, _, _ => True
| node _ l x r, o₁, o₂ => Bounded l o₁ x ∧ Bounded r (↑x) o₂
#align ordnode.bounded Ordnode.Bounded
theorem Bounded.dual :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → @Bounded αᵒᵈ _ (dual t) o₂ o₁
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨Or.dual, ol.dual⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.dual Ordnode.Bounded.dual
theorem Bounded.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} :
Bounded t o₁ o₂ ↔ @Bounded αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) o₂ o₁ :=
⟨Bounded.dual, fun h => by
have := Bounded.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.dual_iff Ordnode.Bounded.dual_iff
theorem Bounded.weak_left : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded t ⊥ o₂
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₂ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨ol.weak_left, Or⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.weak_left Ordnode.Bounded.weak_left
theorem Bounded.weak_right : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded t o₁ ⊤
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₁ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨ol, Or.weak_right⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.weak_right Ordnode.Bounded.weak_right
theorem Bounded.weak {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t o₁ o₂) : Bounded t ⊥ ⊤ :=
h.weak_left.weak_right
#align ordnode.bounded.weak Ordnode.Bounded.weak
theorem Bounded.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o}, Bounded t y o → Bounded t x o
| nil, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| nil, some _, h => lt_of_le_of_lt xy h
| node _ _ _ _, _o, ⟨ol, or⟩ => ⟨ol.mono_left xy, or⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mono_left Ordnode.Bounded.mono_left
theorem Bounded.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o}, Bounded t o x → Bounded t o y
| nil, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| nil, some _, h => lt_of_lt_of_le h xy
| node _ _ _ _, _o, ⟨ol, or⟩ => ⟨ol, or.mono_right xy⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mono_right Ordnode.Bounded.mono_right
theorem Bounded.to_lt : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {x y : α}, Bounded t x y → x < y
| nil, _, _, h => h
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => lt_trans h₁.to_lt h₂.to_lt
#align ordnode.bounded.to_lt Ordnode.Bounded.to_lt
theorem Bounded.to_nil {t : Ordnode α} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil o₁ o₂
| none, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| some _, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| some _, some _, h => h.to_lt
#align ordnode.bounded.to_nil Ordnode.Bounded.to_nil
theorem Bounded.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t₁ o₁ x → Bounded t₂ x o₂ → Bounded t₂ o₁ o₂
| none, _, _, h₂ => h₂.weak_left
| some _, _, h₁, h₂ => h₂.mono_left (le_of_lt h₁.to_lt)
#align ordnode.bounded.trans_left Ordnode.Bounded.trans_left
theorem Bounded.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t₁ o₁ x → Bounded t₂ x o₂ → Bounded t₁ o₁ o₂
| _, none, h₁, _ => h₁.weak_right
| _, some _, h₁, h₂ => h₁.mono_right (le_of_lt h₂.to_lt)
#align ordnode.bounded.trans_right Ordnode.Bounded.trans_right
theorem Bounded.mem_lt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, Bounded t o x → All (· < x) t
| nil, _, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.mem_lt.imp fun _ h => lt_trans h h₂.to_lt, h₂.to_lt, h₂.mem_lt⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mem_lt Ordnode.Bounded.mem_lt
theorem Bounded.mem_gt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, Bounded t x o → All (· > x) t
| nil, _, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁.mem_gt, h₁.to_lt, h₂.mem_gt.imp fun _ => lt_trans h₁.to_lt⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mem_gt Ordnode.Bounded.mem_gt
theorem Bounded.of_lt :
∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil o₁ x → All (· < x) t → Bounded t o₁ x
| nil, _, _, _, _, hn, _ => hn
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, _, ⟨_, al₂, al₃⟩ => ⟨h₁, h₂.of_lt al₂ al₃⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.of_lt Ordnode.Bounded.of_lt
theorem Bounded.of_gt :
∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil x o₂ → All (· > x) t → Bounded t x o₂
| nil, _, _, _, _, hn, _ => hn
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, _, ⟨al₁, al₂, _⟩ => ⟨h₁.of_gt al₂ al₁, h₂⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.of_gt Ordnode.Bounded.of_gt
theorem Bounded.to_sep {t₁ t₂ o₁ o₂} {x : α}
(h₁ : Bounded t₁ o₁ (x : WithTop α)) (h₂ : Bounded t₂ (x : WithBot α) o₂) :
t₁.All fun y => t₂.All fun z : α => y < z := by
refine h₁.mem_lt.imp fun y yx => ?_
exact h₂.mem_gt.imp fun z xz => lt_trans yx xz
#align ordnode.bounded.to_sep Ordnode.Bounded.to_sep
end
/-! ### `Valid` -/
section
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
#align ordnode.valid' Ordnode.Valid'
#align ordnode.valid'.ord Ordnode.Valid'.ord
#align ordnode.valid'.sz Ordnode.Valid'.sz
#align ordnode.valid'.bal Ordnode.Valid'.bal
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
#align ordnode.valid Ordnode.Valid
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.mono_left Ordnode.Valid'.mono_left
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.mono_right Ordnode.Valid'.mono_right
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.trans_left Ordnode.Valid'.trans_left
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.trans_right Ordnode.Valid'.trans_right
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.of_lt Ordnode.Valid'.of_lt
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.of_gt Ordnode.Valid'.of_gt
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.valid Ordnode.Valid'.valid
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'_nil Ordnode.valid'_nil
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
#align ordnode.valid_nil Ordnode.valid_nil
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.node Ordnode.Valid'.node
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, o₁, o₂, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l x r, o₁, o₂, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.dual Ordnode.Valid'.dual
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.dual_iff Ordnode.Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
#align ordnode.valid.dual Ordnode.Valid.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
#align ordnode.valid.dual_iff Ordnode.Valid.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.left Ordnode.Valid'.left
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.right Ordnode.Valid'.right
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
#align ordnode.valid.left Ordnode.Valid.left
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
#align ordnode.valid.right Ordnode.Valid.right
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
#align ordnode.valid.size_eq Ordnode.Valid.size_eq
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
#align ordnode.valid'.node' Ordnode.Valid'.node'
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
#align ordnode.valid'_singleton Ordnode.valid'_singleton
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
#align ordnode.valid_singleton Ordnode.valid_singleton
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
#align ordnode.valid'.node3_l Ordnode.Valid'.node3L
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
#align ordnode.valid'.node3_r Ordnode.Valid'.node3R
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₁ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₁
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₂ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₂
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₃ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₃
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₄ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₄
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₅ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₅
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
cases' m with s ml z mr; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l Ordnode.Valid'.node4L
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₁ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₂ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₃ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₄ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
erw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_r Ordnode.Valid'.rotateR
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
#align ordnode.valid'.balance'_aux Ordnode.Valid'.balance'_aux
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· apply Or.inr; rwa [l0] at this
change 1 ≤ _ at l0; apply Or.inl; omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
#align ordnode.valid'.balance'_lemma Ordnode.Valid'.balance'_lemma
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
#align ordnode.valid'.balance' Ordnode.Valid'.balance'
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
#align ordnode.valid'.balance Ordnode.Valid'.balance
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_l_aux Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_l Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_r_aux Ordnode.Valid'.balanceR_aux
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_r Ordnode.Valid'.balanceR
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction' r with rs rl rx rr _ IHrr generalizing l x o₁
· exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
#align ordnode.valid'.erase_max_aux Ordnode.Valid'.eraseMax_aux
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 1,404 | 1,409 | theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by |
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.W.Basic
#align_import data.pfunctor.univariate.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# Polynomial functors
This file defines polynomial functors and the W-type construction as a
polynomial functor. (For the M-type construction, see
pfunctor/M.lean.)
-/
-- "W", "Idx"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- A polynomial functor `P` is given by a type `A` and a family `B` of types over `A`. `P` maps
any type `α` to a new type `P α`, which is defined as the sigma type `Σ x, P.B x → α`.
An element of `P α` is a pair `⟨a, f⟩`, where `a` is an element of a type `A` and
`f : B a → α`. Think of `a` as the shape of the object and `f` as an index to the relevant
elements of `α`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
structure PFunctor where
/-- The head type -/
A : Type u
/-- The child family of types -/
B : A → Type u
#align pfunctor PFunctor
namespace PFunctor
instance : Inhabited PFunctor :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
variable (P : PFunctor.{u}) {α : Type v₁} {β : Type v₂} {γ : Type v₃}
/-- Applying `P` to an object of `Type` -/
@[coe]
def Obj (α : Type v) :=
Σ x : P.A, P.B x → α
#align pfunctor.obj PFunctor.Obj
instance : CoeFun PFunctor.{u} (fun _ => Type v → Type (max u v)) where
coe := Obj
/-- Applying `P` to a morphism of `Type` -/
def map (f : α → β) : P α → P β :=
fun ⟨a, g⟩ => ⟨a, f ∘ g⟩
#align pfunctor.map PFunctor.map
instance Obj.inhabited [Inhabited P.A] [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (P α) :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
#align pfunctor.obj.inhabited PFunctor.Obj.inhabited
instance : Functor.{v, max u v} P.Obj where map := @map P
/-- We prefer `PFunctor.map` to `Functor.map` because it is universe-polymorphic. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β : Type v} (f : α → β) (x : P α) : f <$> x = P.map f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq (f : α → β) (a : P.A) (g : P.B a → α) :
P.map f ⟨a, g⟩ = ⟨a, f ∘ g⟩ :=
rfl
#align pfunctor.map_eq PFunctor.map_eq
@[simp]
protected theorem id_map : ∀ x : P α, P.map id x = x := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pfunctor.id_map PFunctor.id_map
@[simp]
protected theorem map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
∀ x : P α, P.map g (P.map f x) = P.map (g ∘ f) x := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pfunctor.comp_map PFunctor.map_map
instance : LawfulFunctor.{v, max u v} P.Obj where
map_const := rfl
id_map x := P.id_map x
comp_map f g x := P.map_map f g x |>.symm
/-- re-export existing definition of W-types and
adapt it to a packaged definition of polynomial functor -/
def W :=
WType P.B
#align pfunctor.W PFunctor.W
/- inhabitants of W types is awkward to encode as an instance
assumption because there needs to be a value `a : P.A`
such that `P.B a` is empty to yield a finite tree -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- attribute [nolint has_nonempty_instance] W
variable {P}
/-- root element of a W tree -/
def W.head : W P → P.A
| ⟨a, _f⟩ => a
#align pfunctor.W.head PFunctor.W.head
/-- children of the root of a W tree -/
def W.children : ∀ x : W P, P.B (W.head x) → W P
| ⟨_a, f⟩ => f
#align pfunctor.W.children PFunctor.W.children
/-- destructor for W-types -/
def W.dest : W P → P (W P)
| ⟨a, f⟩ => ⟨a, f⟩
#align pfunctor.W.dest PFunctor.W.dest
/-- constructor for W-types -/
def W.mk : P (W P) → W P
| ⟨a, f⟩ => ⟨a, f⟩
#align pfunctor.W.mk PFunctor.W.mk
@[simp]
theorem W.dest_mk (p : P (W P)) : W.dest (W.mk p) = p := by cases p; rfl
#align pfunctor.W.dest_mk PFunctor.W.dest_mk
@[simp]
theorem W.mk_dest (p : W P) : W.mk (W.dest p) = p := by cases p; rfl
#align pfunctor.W.mk_dest PFunctor.W.mk_dest
variable (P)
/-- `Idx` identifies a location inside the application of a pfunctor.
For `F : PFunctor`, `x : F α` and `i : F.Idx`, `i` can designate
one part of `x` or is invalid, if `i.1 ≠ x.1` -/
def Idx :=
Σ x : P.A, P.B x
#align pfunctor.Idx PFunctor.Idx
instance Idx.inhabited [Inhabited P.A] [Inhabited (P.B default)] : Inhabited P.Idx :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
#align pfunctor.Idx.inhabited PFunctor.Idx.inhabited
variable {P}
/-- `x.iget i` takes the component of `x` designated by `i` if any is or returns
a default value -/
def Obj.iget [DecidableEq P.A] {α} [Inhabited α] (x : P α) (i : P.Idx) : α :=
if h : i.1 = x.1 then x.2 (cast (congr_arg _ h) i.2) else default
#align pfunctor.obj.iget PFunctor.Obj.iget
@[simp]
theorem fst_map (x : P α) (f : α → β) : (P.map f x).1 = x.1 := by cases x; rfl
#align pfunctor.fst_map PFunctor.fst_map
@[simp]
theorem iget_map [DecidableEq P.A] [Inhabited α] [Inhabited β] (x : P α)
(f : α → β) (i : P.Idx) (h : i.1 = x.1) : (P.map f x).iget i = f (x.iget i) := by
simp only [Obj.iget, fst_map, *, dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true]
cases x
rfl
#align pfunctor.iget_map PFunctor.iget_map
end PFunctor
/-
Composition of polynomial functors.
-/
namespace PFunctor
/-- functor composition for polynomial functors -/
def comp (P₂ P₁ : PFunctor.{u}) : PFunctor.{u} :=
⟨Σ a₂ : P₂.1, P₂.2 a₂ → P₁.1, fun a₂a₁ => Σ u : P₂.2 a₂a₁.1, P₁.2 (a₂a₁.2 u)⟩
#align pfunctor.comp PFunctor.comp
/-- constructor for composition -/
def comp.mk (P₂ P₁ : PFunctor.{u}) {α : Type} (x : P₂ (P₁ α)) : comp P₂ P₁ α :=
⟨⟨x.1, Sigma.fst ∘ x.2⟩, fun a₂a₁ => (x.2 a₂a₁.1).2 a₂a₁.2⟩
#align pfunctor.comp.mk PFunctor.comp.mk
/-- destructor for composition -/
def comp.get (P₂ P₁ : PFunctor.{u}) {α : Type} (x : comp P₂ P₁ α) : P₂ (P₁ α) :=
⟨x.1.1, fun a₂ => ⟨x.1.2 a₂, fun a₁ => x.2 ⟨a₂, a₁⟩⟩⟩
#align pfunctor.comp.get PFunctor.comp.get
end PFunctor
/-
Lifting predicates and relations.
-/
namespace PFunctor
variable {P : PFunctor.{u}}
open Functor
theorem liftp_iff {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (x : P α) :
Liftp p x ↔ ∃ a f, x = ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ ∀ i, p (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
cases' h : y with a f
refine ⟨a, fun i => (f i).val, ?_, fun i => (f i).property⟩
rw [← hy, h, map_eq_map, PFunctor.map_eq]
congr
rintro ⟨a, f, xeq, pf⟩
use ⟨a, fun i => ⟨f i, pf i⟩⟩
rw [xeq]; rfl
#align pfunctor.liftp_iff PFunctor.liftp_iff
theorem liftp_iff' {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (a : P.A) (f : P.B a → α) :
@Liftp.{u} P.Obj _ α p ⟨a, f⟩ ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by
simp only [liftp_iff, Sigma.mk.inj_iff]; constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨a', f', heq, h'⟩
cases heq
assumption
repeat' first |constructor|assumption
#align pfunctor.liftp_iff' PFunctor.liftp_iff'
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Univariate/Basic.lean | 220 | 239 | theorem liftr_iff {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (x y : P α) :
Liftr r x y ↔ ∃ a f₀ f₁, x = ⟨a, f₀⟩ ∧ y = ⟨a, f₁⟩ ∧ ∀ i, r (f₀ i) (f₁ i) := by |
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, xeq, yeq⟩
cases' h : u with a f
use a, fun i => (f i).val.fst, fun i => (f i).val.snd
constructor
· rw [← xeq, h]
rfl
constructor
· rw [← yeq, h]
rfl
intro i
exact (f i).property
rintro ⟨a, f₀, f₁, xeq, yeq, h⟩
use ⟨a, fun i => ⟨(f₀ i, f₁ i), h i⟩⟩
constructor
· rw [xeq]
rfl
rw [yeq]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lawrence Wu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lawrence Wu
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LocallyIntegrable
/-!
# Bounding of integrals by asymptotics
We establish integrability of `f` from `f = O(g)`.
## Main results
* `Asymptotics.IsBigO.integrableAtFilter`: If `f = O[l] g` on measurably generated `l`,
`f` is strongly measurable at `l`, and `g` is integrable at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`.
* `MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_cocompact`: If `f` is locally integrable,
and `f =O[cocompact] g` for some `g` integrable at `cocompact`, then `f` is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_atBot_atTop`: If `f` is locally integrable,
and `f =O[atBot] g`, `f =O[atTop] g'` for some `g`, `g'` integrable `atBot` and `atTop`
respectively, then `f` is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_atTop_of_norm_isNegInvariant`:
If `f` is locally integrable, `‖f(-x)‖ = ‖f(x)‖`, and `f =O[atTop] g` for some
`g` integrable `atTop`, then `f` is integrable.
-/
open Asymptotics MeasureTheory Set Filter
variable {α E F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
{f : α → E} {g : α → F} {a b : α} {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter α}
/-- If `f = O[l] g` on measurably generated `l`, `f` is strongly measurable at `l`,
and `g` is integrable at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`. -/
theorem _root_.Asymptotics.IsBigO.integrableAtFilter [IsMeasurablyGenerated l]
(hf : f =O[l] g) (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := hf.bound
obtain ⟨s, hsl, hsm, hfg, hf, hg⟩ :=
(hC.smallSets.and <| hfm.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists_measurable_mem_of_smallSets
refine ⟨s, hsl, (hg.norm.const_mul C).mono hf ?_⟩
refine (ae_restrict_mem hsm).mono fun x hx ↦ ?_
exact (hfg x hx).trans (le_abs_self _)
/-- Variant of `MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono` taking `f =O[⊤] (g)` instead of `‖f(x)‖ ≤ ‖g(x)‖` -/
theorem _root_.Asymptotics.IsBigO.integrable (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf : f =O[⊤] g) (hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable f μ := by
rewrite [← integrableAtFilter_top] at *
exact hf.integrableAtFilter ⟨univ, univ_mem, hfm.restrict⟩ hg
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- If `f` is locally integrable, and `f =O[cocompact] g` for some `g` integrable at `cocompact`,
then `f` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_cocompact [IsMeasurablyGenerated (cocompact α)]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (ho : f =O[cocompact α] g)
(hg : IntegrableAtFilter g (cocompact α) μ) : Integrable f μ := by
refine integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨ho.integrableAtFilter ?_ hg, hf⟩
exact hf.aestronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [CompactIccSpace α] {g' : α → F}
/-- If `f` is locally integrable, and `f =O[atBot] g`, `f =O[atTop] g'` for some
`g`, `g'` integrable at `atBot` and `atTop` respectively, then `f` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_atBot_atTop
[IsMeasurablyGenerated (atBot (α := α))] [IsMeasurablyGenerated (atTop (α := α))]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(ho : f =O[atBot] g) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g atBot μ)
(ho' : f =O[atTop] g') (hg' : IntegrableAtFilter g' atTop μ) : Integrable f μ := by
refine integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_atTop.mpr
⟨⟨ho.integrableAtFilter ?_ hg, ho'.integrableAtFilter ?_ hg'⟩, hf⟩
all_goals exact hf.aestronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
/-- If `f` is locally integrable on `(∞, a]`, and `f =O[atBot] g`, for some
`g` integrable at `atBot`, then `f` is integrable on `(∞, a]`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_of_isBigO_atBot [IsMeasurablyGenerated (atBot (α := α))]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ) (ho : f =O[atBot] g)
(hg : IntegrableAtFilter g atBot μ) : IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot.mpr ⟨ho.integrableAtFilter ?_ hg, hf⟩
exact ⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, hf.aestronglyMeasurable⟩
/-- If `f` is locally integrable on `[a, ∞)`, and `f =O[atTop] g`, for some
`g` integrable at `atTop`, then `f` is integrable on `[a, ∞)`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Asymptotics.lean | 89 | 93 | theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_of_isBigO_atTop [IsMeasurablyGenerated (atTop (α := α))]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ) (ho : f =O[atTop] g)
(hg : IntegrableAtFilter g atTop μ) : IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ := by |
refine integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop.mpr ⟨ho.integrableAtFilter ?_ hg, hf⟩
exact ⟨Ici a, Ici_mem_atTop a, hf.aestronglyMeasurable⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakDual
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.HasOuterApproxClosed
#align_import measure_theory.measure.finite_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Finite measures
This file defines the type of finite measures on a given measurable space. When the underlying
space has a topology and the measurable space structure (sigma algebra) is finer than the Borel
sigma algebra, then the type of finite measures is equipped with the topology of weak convergence
of measures. The topology of weak convergence is the coarsest topology w.r.t. which
for every bounded continuous `ℝ≥0`-valued function `f`, the integration of `f` against the
measure is continuous.
## Main definitions
The main definitions are
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω`: The type of finite measures on `Ω` with the topology of weak
convergence of measures.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → (WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`:
Interpret a finite measure as a continuous linear functional on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω`. This is used for the definition of the
topology of weak convergence.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.map`: The push-forward `f* μ` of a finite measure `μ` on `Ω`
along a measurable function `f : Ω → Ω'`.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mapCLM`: The push-forward along a given continuous `f : Ω → Ω'`
as a continuous linear map `f* : FiniteMeasure Ω →L[ℝ≥0] FiniteMeasure Ω'`.
## Main results
* Finite measures `μ` on `Ω` give rise to continuous linear functionals on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω` via integration:
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → (WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto`: Convergence of finite
measures is characterized by the convergence of integrals of all bounded continuous functions.
This shows that the chosen definition of topology coincides with the common textbook definition
of weak convergence of measures. A similar characterization by the convergence of integrals (in
the `MeasureTheory.lintegral` sense) of all bounded continuous nonnegative functions is
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto`.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.continuous_map`: For a continuous function `f : Ω → Ω'`, the
push-forward of finite measures `f* : FiniteMeasure Ω → FiniteMeasure Ω'` is continuous.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.t2Space`: The topology of weak convergence of finite Borel measures
is Hausdorff on spaces where indicators of closed sets have continuous decreasing approximating
sequences (in particular on any pseudo-metrizable spaces).
## Implementation notes
The topology of weak convergence of finite Borel measures is defined using a mapping from
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` to `WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)`, inheriting the topology from the
latter.
The implementation of `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` and is directly as a subtype of
`MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`, and the coercion to a function is the composition `ENNReal.toNNReal`
and the coercion to function of `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`. Another alternative would have been to
use a bijection with `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure Ω ℝ≥0` as an intermediate step. Some
considerations:
* Potential advantages of using the `NNReal`-valued vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would avoid need to compose with `ENNReal.toNNReal`, the
`NNReal`-valued API could be more directly available.
* Potential drawbacks of the vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would lose monotonicity, as non-measurable sets would be defined to
have measure 0.
* No integration theory directly. E.g., the topology definition requires
`MeasureTheory.lintegral` w.r.t. a coercion to `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω` in any case.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, finite measure
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory
open Set
open Filter
open BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace FiniteMeasure
section FiniteMeasure
/-! ### Finite measures
In this section we define the `Type` of `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω`, when `Ω` is a measurable
space. Finite measures on `Ω` are a module over `ℝ≥0`.
If `Ω` is moreover a topological space and the sigma algebra on `Ω` is finer than the Borel sigma
algebra (i.e. `[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]`), then `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` is equipped with
the topology of weak convergence of measures. This is implemented by defining a pairing of finite
measures `μ` on `Ω` with continuous bounded nonnegative functions `f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0` via integration,
and using the associated weak topology (essentially the weak-star topology on the dual of
`Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0`).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- Finite measures are defined as the subtype of measures that have the property of being finite
measures (i.e., their total mass is finite). -/
def _root_.MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Type _ :=
{ μ : Measure Ω // IsFiniteMeasure μ }
#align measure_theory.finite_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure
-- Porting note: as with other subtype synonyms (e.g., `ℝ≥0`, we need a new function for the
-- coercion instead of relying on `Subtype.val`.
/-- Coercion from `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` to `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`. -/
@[coe]
def toMeasure : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω := Subtype.val
/-- A finite measure can be interpreted as a measure. -/
instance instCoe : Coe (FiniteMeasure Ω) (MeasureTheory.Measure Ω) where
coe := toMeasure
instance isFiniteMeasure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure Ω) :=
μ.prop
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.isFiniteMeasure
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.val_eq_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.val_eq_toMeasure
theorem toMeasure_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_injective MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (FiniteMeasure Ω) (Set Ω) ℝ≥0 where
coe μ s := ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal
coe_injective' μ ν h := toMeasure_injective $ Measure.ext fun s _ ↦ by
simpa [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, measure_ne_top] using congr_fun h s
lemma coeFn_def (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ = fun s ↦ ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal := rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_eq_to_nnreal_coe_fn_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_def
lemma coeFn_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = fun s ↦ (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma mk_apply (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) (s : Set Ω) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ s = (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : Measure Ω) s :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_lt_top (↑ν) s).ne
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.ennreal_coe_fn_eq_coe_fn_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure
theorem apply_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {s₁ s₂ : Set Ω} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := by
change ((μ : Measure Ω) s₁).toNNReal ≤ ((μ : Measure Ω) s₂).toNNReal
have key : (μ : Measure Ω) s₁ ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) s₂ := (μ : Measure Ω).mono h
apply (ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal (measure_ne_top _ s₁) (measure_ne_top _ s₂)).mpr key
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.apply_mono MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.apply_mono
/-- The (total) mass of a finite measure `μ` is `μ univ`, i.e., the cast to `NNReal` of
`(μ : measure Ω) univ`. -/
def mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ℝ≥0 :=
μ univ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass
@[simp] theorem apply_le_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) : μ s ≤ μ.mass := by
simpa using apply_mono μ (subset_univ s)
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_mass {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} : (μ.mass : ℝ≥0∞) = (μ : Measure Ω) univ :=
ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure μ Set.univ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.ennreal_mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.ennreal_mass
instance instZero : Zero (FiniteMeasure Ω) where zero := ⟨0, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero⟩
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.instZero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : FiniteMeasure Ω) = 0 := rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_mass : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).mass = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.zero.mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.zero_mass
@[simp]
theorem mass_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun μ_mass => ?_, fun hμ => by simp only [hμ, zero_mass]⟩
apply toMeasure_injective
apply Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.mp
rwa [← ennreal_mass, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass_zero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff
theorem mass_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 := by
rw [not_iff_not]
exact FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff μ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass_nonzero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass_nonzero_iff
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → (μ : Measure Ω) s = (ν : Measure Ω) s) : μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
ext1 s s_mble
exact h s s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.eq_of_forall_measure_apply_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq
theorem eq_of_forall_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
ext1 s s_mble
simpa [ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) (h s s_mble)
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.eq_of_forall_apply_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.eq_of_forall_apply_eq
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd : Add (FiniteMeasure Ω) where add μ ν := ⟨μ + ν, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureAdd⟩
variable {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0] [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul : SMul R (FiniteMeasure Ω) where
smul (c : R) μ := ⟨c • (μ : Measure Ω), MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_zero : ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_zero
-- Porting note: with `simp` here the `coeFn` lemmas below fall prey to `simpNF`: the LHS simplifies
@[norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(μ + ν) = (↑μ + ↑ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_smul (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(c • μ) = c • (μ : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_smul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : (⇑(μ + ν) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (⇑μ + ⇑ν : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_inj, ne_eq, ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure,
ENNReal.coe_add]
norm_cast
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_add MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_smul [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
(⇑(c • μ) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = c • (⇑μ : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext; simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ENNReal.coe_smul]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_smul MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_smul
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
toMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid (↑) toMeasure_zero toMeasure_add fun _ _ => toMeasure_smul _ _
/-- Coercion is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def toMeasureAddMonoidHom : FiniteMeasure Ω →+ Measure Ω where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := toMeasure_zero
map_add' := toMeasure_add
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_add_monoid_hom MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasureAddMonoidHom
instance {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Module ℝ≥0 (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
Function.Injective.module _ toMeasureAddMonoidHom toMeasure_injective toMeasure_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s := by
rw [coeFn_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_smul_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.smul_apply
/-- Restrict a finite measure μ to a set A. -/
def restrict (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : FiniteMeasure Ω where
val := (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A
property := MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureRestrict (μ : Measure Ω) A
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict
theorem restrict_measure_eq (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) :
(μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) = (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_measure_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_measure_eq
theorem restrict_apply_measure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω}
(s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) s = (μ : Measure Ω) (s ∩ A) :=
Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_apply_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_apply_measure
theorem restrict_apply (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω} (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict A) s = μ (s ∩ A) := by
apply congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal
exact Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : (μ.restrict A).mass = μ A := by
simp only [mass, restrict_apply μ A MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_mass
theorem restrict_eq_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A = 0 ↔ μ A = 0 := by
rw [← mass_zero_iff, restrict_mass]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_eq_zero_iff
theorem restrict_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A ≠ 0 ↔ μ A ≠ 0 := by
rw [← mass_nonzero_iff, restrict_mass]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_nonzero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_nonzero_iff
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω]
/-- Two finite Borel measures are equal if the integrals of all bounded continuous functions with
respect to both agree. -/
theorem ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] [BorelSpace Ω]
{μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω} (h : ∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ν) :
μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
change (μ : Measure Ω) = (ν : Measure Ω)
exact ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq_of_IsFiniteMeasure h
/-- The pairing of a finite (Borel) measure `μ` with a nonnegative bounded continuous
function is obtained by (Lebesgue) integrating the (test) function against the measure.
This is `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN`. -/
def testAgainstNN (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0 :=
(∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω)).toNNReal
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_coe_eq {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} :
(μ.testAgainstNN f : ℝ≥0∞) = ∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω) :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (f.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _).ne
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_coe_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_coe_eq
theorem testAgainstNN_const (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (c : ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (BoundedContinuousFunction.const Ω c) = c * μ.mass := by
simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_const MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_const
theorem testAgainstNN_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {f g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} (f_le_g : (f : Ω → ℝ≥0) ≤ g) :
μ.testAgainstNN f ≤ μ.testAgainstNN g := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
gcongr
apply f_le_g
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_mono MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_mono
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_zero (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using μ.testAgainstNN_const 0
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_zero
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_one (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 1 = μ.mass := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, coe_one, Pi.one_apply, ENNReal.coe_one, lintegral_one]
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_one MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_one
@[simp]
theorem zero_testAgainstNN_apply (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN f = 0 := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_zero, lintegral_zero_measure, ENNReal.zero_toNNReal]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.zero.test_against_nn_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.zero_testAgainstNN_apply
theorem zero_testAgainstNN : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN = 0 := by
funext;
simp only [zero_testAgainstNN_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.zero.test_against_nn MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.zero_testAgainstNN
@[simp]
theorem smul_testAgainstNN_apply (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
(c • μ).testAgainstNN f = c • μ.testAgainstNN f := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.smul_toNNReal, ENNReal.smul_def,
lintegral_smul_measure]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.smul_test_against_nn_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.smul_testAgainstNN_apply
section weak_convergence
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/FiniteMeasure.lean | 389 | 393 | theorem testAgainstNN_add (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f₁ f₂ : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (f₁ + f₂) = μ.testAgainstNN f₁ + μ.testAgainstNN f₂ := by |
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
exact lintegral_add_left (BoundedContinuousFunction.measurable_coe_ennreal_comp _) _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
#align_import data.nat.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals of naturals
This file proves that `ℕ` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
## TODO
Some lemmas can be generalized using `OrderedGroup`, `CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid` or `SuccOrder`
and subsequently be moved upstream to `Order.Interval.Finset`.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists Ring
open Finset Nat
variable (a b c : ℕ)
namespace Nat
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℕ where
finsetIcc a b := ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIco a b := ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoc a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoo a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
theorem Icc_eq_range' : Icc a b = ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Icc_eq_range' Nat.Icc_eq_range'
theorem Ico_eq_range' : Ico a b = ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ico_eq_range' Nat.Ico_eq_range'
theorem Ioc_eq_range' : Ioc a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioc_eq_range' Nat.Ioc_eq_range'
theorem Ioo_eq_range' : Ioo a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioo_eq_range' Nat.Ioo_eq_range'
theorem uIcc_eq_range' :
uIcc a b = ⟨List.range' (min a b) (max a b + 1 - min a b), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ := rfl
#align nat.uIcc_eq_range' Nat.uIcc_eq_range'
theorem Iio_eq_range : Iio = range := by
ext b x
rw [mem_Iio, mem_range]
#align nat.Iio_eq_range Nat.Iio_eq_range
@[simp]
theorem Ico_zero_eq_range : Ico 0 = range := by rw [← Nat.bot_eq_zero, ← Iio_eq_Ico, Iio_eq_range]
#align nat.Ico_zero_eq_range Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range
lemma range_eq_Icc_zero_sub_one (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0): range n = Icc 0 (n - 1) := by
ext b
simp_all only [mem_Icc, zero_le, true_and, mem_range]
exact lt_iff_le_pred (zero_lt_of_ne_zero hn)
theorem _root_.Finset.range_eq_Ico : range = Ico 0 :=
Ico_zero_eq_range.symm
#align finset.range_eq_Ico Finset.range_eq_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = b + 1 - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Icc Nat.card_Icc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ico Nat.card_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioc Nat.card_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = b - a - 1 :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioo Nat.card_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : (uIcc a b).card = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_Icc _ _).trans $ by rw [← Int.natCast_inj, sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min, Int.ofNat_sub] <;> omega
#align nat.card_uIcc Nat.card_uIcc
@[simp]
lemma card_Iic : (Iic b).card = b + 1 := by rw [Iic_eq_Icc, card_Icc, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iic Nat.card_Iic
@[simp]
theorem card_Iio : (Iio b).card = b := by rw [Iio_eq_Ico, card_Ico, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iio Nat.card_Iio
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIcc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Icc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Icc Nat.card_fintypeIcc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIco : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ico]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ico Nat.card_fintypeIco
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioc Nat.card_fintypeIoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioo]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioo Nat.card_fintypeIoo
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Nat.lean | 138 | 139 | theorem card_fintypeIic : Fintype.card (Set.Iic b) = b + 1 := by |
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Iic]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
#align_import data.finset.card from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `s.card : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
-- TODO: After a lot more work,
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
#align finset.card Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : s.card = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_def Finset.card_def
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = s.card := rfl
#align finset.card_val Finset.card_val
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : (⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α).card = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
#align finset.card_mk Finset.card_mk
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : card (∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_empty Finset.card_empty
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → s.card ≤ t.card :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
#align finset.card_le_of_subset Finset.card_le_card
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
#align finset.card_mono Finset.card_mono
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : s.card = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : s.card ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma card_pos : 0 < s.card ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
#align finset.card_eq_zero Finset.card_eq_zero
#align finset.card_pos Finset.card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
#align finset.nonempty.card_pos Finset.Nonempty.card_pos
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s.card ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
#align finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem Finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : Finset α) = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
#align finset.card_singleton Finset.card_singleton
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : ({a} ∩ s).card ≤ 1 := by
cases' Finset.decidableMem a s with h h
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.card_singleton_inter Finset.card_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).card = s.card + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
#align finset.card_cons Finset.card_cons
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).card = s.card + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
#align finset.card_insert_of_not_mem Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : card (insert a s) = s.card := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align finset.card_insert_of_mem Finset.card_insert_of_mem
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : card (insert a s) ≤ s.card + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.card_insert_le Finset.card_insert_le
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : card {a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : card {a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : card {a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : card {a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : card {a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : card (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.card else s.card + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
#align finset.card_insert_eq_ite Finset.card_insert_eq_ite
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : ({a,b} : Finset α).card = 1 ∨ ({a,b} : Finset α).card = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Finset α).card = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
#align finset.card_doubleton Finset.card_pair
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-04")] alias card_doubleton := Finset.card_pair
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card = s.card - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
#align finset.card_erase_of_mem Finset.card_erase_of_mem
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$.
This result is casted to any additive group with 1,
so that we don't have to work with `ℕ`-subtraction. -/
@[simp]
theorem cast_card_erase_of_mem {R} [AddGroupWithOne R] {s : Finset α} (hs : a ∈ s) :
((s.erase a).card : R) = s.card - 1 := by
rw [card_erase_of_mem hs, Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rw [Nat.add_one_le_iff, Finset.card_pos]
exact ⟨a, hs⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card + 1 = s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
#align finset.card_erase_add_one Finset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card < s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
#align finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : (s.erase a).card ≤ s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
#align finset.card_erase_le Finset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : s.card - 1 ≤ (s.erase a).card := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
#align finset.pred_card_le_card_erase Finset.pred_card_le_card_erase
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : (s.erase a).card = if a ∈ s then s.card - 1 else s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
#align finset.card_erase_eq_ite Finset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : (range n).card = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
#align finset.card_range Finset.card_range
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : s.attach.card = s.card :=
Multiset.card_attach
#align finset.card_attach Finset.card_attach
end Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : m.toFinset.card = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
#align multiset.card_to_finset Multiset.card_toFinset
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : m.toFinset.card ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
#align multiset.to_finset_card_le Multiset.toFinset_card_le
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
m.toFinset.card = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
#align multiset.to_finset_card_of_nodup Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
m.toFinset.card = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : l.toFinset.card = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
#align list.card_to_finset List.card_toFinset
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : l.toFinset.card ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
#align list.to_finset_card_le List.toFinset_card_le
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : l.toFinset.card = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
#align list.to_finset_card_of_nodup List.toFinset_card_of_nodup
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = s.card := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
#align finset.length_to_list Finset.length_toList
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : (s.image f).card ≤ s.card := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
#align finset.card_image_le Finset.card_image_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (s.image f).card = s.card := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
#align finset.card_image_of_inj_on Finset.card_image_of_injOn
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : (s.image f).card = s.card) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
#align finset.inj_on_of_card_image_eq Finset.injOn_of_card_image_eq
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : (s.image f).card = s.card ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
#align finset.card_image_iff Finset.card_image_iff
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
(s.image f).card = s.card :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
#align finset.card_image_of_injective Finset.card_image_of_injective
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
(s.filter fun x => f x = y).card ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
#align finset.fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image Finset.fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
(s.filter P).card ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < s'.card → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun x hx ↦ subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : (s.map f).card = s.card :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
#align finset.card_map Finset.card_map
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
(s.subtype p).card = (s.filter p).card := by simp [Finset.subtype]
#align finset.card_subtype Finset.card_subtype
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.filter p).card ≤ s.card :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
#align finset.card_filter_le Finset.card_filter_le
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t.card ≤ s.card) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
#align finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.card ≤ s.card) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
#align finset.eq_of_superset_of_card_ge Finset.eq_of_superset_of_card_ge
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : t.card ≤ s.card) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
#align finset.subset_iff_eq_of_card_le Finset.subset_iff_eq_of_card_le
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
#align finset.map_eq_of_subset Finset.map_eq_of_subset
theorem filter_card_eq {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : (s.filter p).card = s.card) (x : α)
(hx : x ∈ s) : p x := by
rw [← eq_of_subset_of_card_le (s.filter_subset p) h.ge, mem_filter] at hx
exact hx.2
#align finset.filter_card_eq Finset.filter_card_eq
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : s.card < t.card := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
#align finset.card_lt_card Finset.card_lt_card
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.card = n := by
classical
have : s = (range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2) := by
ext a
suffices _ : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ (i : _) (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a by
simpa only [mem_image, mem_attach, true_and_iff, Subtype.exists]
constructor
· intro ha; obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf a ha; use i, mem_range.2 hi
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; apply hf'
calc
s.card = ((range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)).card := by rw [this]
_ = (range n).attach.card := ?_
_ = (range n).card := card_attach
_ = n := card_range n
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq
exact Subtype.eq <| f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
#align finset.card_eq_of_bijective Finset.card_eq_of_bijective
section bij
variable {t : Finset β}
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
lemma card_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) : s.card = t.card := by
classical
calc
s.card = s.attach.card := card_attach.symm
_ = (s.attach.image fun a : { a // a ∈ s } => i a.1 a.2).card := Eq.symm ?_
_ = t.card := ?_
· apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
simpa using i_inj _ _ _ _ h
· congr 1
ext b
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h; apply hi
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := i_surj b h; exact mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simp⟩
#align finset.card_bij Finset.card_bij
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias card_congr := card_bij
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
lemma card_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, α) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) : s.card = t.card := by
refine card_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩)
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain. -/
lemma card_nbij (i : α → β) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set α).SurjOn i t) : s.card = t.card :=
card_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj)
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains.
The difference with `Finset.card_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains,
rather than on the entire types. -/
lemma card_nbij' (i : α → β) (j : β → α) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a) : s.card = t.card :=
card_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) : s.card = t.card := by
refine card_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [hst]
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_bijective (e : α → β) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) :
s.card = t.card := card_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst
end bij
theorem card_le_card_of_inj_on {t : Finset β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(f_inj : ∀ a₁ ∈ s, ∀ a₂ ∈ s, f a₁ = f a₂ → a₁ = a₂) : s.card ≤ t.card := by
classical
calc
s.card = (s.image f).card := (card_image_of_injOn f_inj).symm
_ ≤ t.card := card_le_card <| image_subset_iff.2 hf
#align finset.card_le_card_of_inj_on Finset.card_le_card_of_inj_on
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : Finset β} (hc : t.card < s.card) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) : ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
classical
by_contra! hz
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_inj_on f hf ?_)
intro x hx y hy
contrapose
exact hz x hx y hy
#align finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to Finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to
theorem le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ s.card :=
calc
n = card (range n) := (card_range n).symm
_ ≤ s.card := card_le_card_of_inj_on f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa only [mem_range])
#align finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le {t : Finset β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.card ≤ s.card) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
classical
intro b hb
have h : (s.attach.image fun a : { a // a ∈ s } => f a a.prop).card = s.card := by
rw [← @card_attach _ s]
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
exact Subtype.eq <| hinj _ _ _ _ h
have h' : image (fun a : { a // a ∈ s } => f a a.prop) s.attach = t := by
apply eq_of_subset_of_card_le
· intro b h
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h
apply hf
· simp [hst, h]
rw [← h'] at hb
obtain ⟨a, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 hb
use a, a.2
#align finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le {t : Finset β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.card ≤ t.card) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ :=
haveI : Inhabited { x // x ∈ s } := ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁⟩⟩
let f' : { x // x ∈ s } → { x // x ∈ t } := fun x => ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf x.1 x.2⟩
let g : { x // x ∈ t } → { x // x ∈ s } :=
@surjInv _ _ f' fun x =>
let ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := hsurj x.1 x.2
⟨⟨y, hy₁⟩, Subtype.eq hy₂⟩
have hg : Injective g := injective_surjInv _
have hsg : Surjective g := fun x =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ :=
surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (fun (x : { x // x ∈ t }) (_ : x ∈ t.attach) => g x)
(fun x _ => show g x ∈ s.attach from mem_attach _ _) (fun x y _ _ hxy => hg hxy) (by simpa)
x (mem_attach _ _)
⟨y, hy.snd.symm⟩
have hif : Injective f' :=
(leftInverse_of_surjective_of_rightInverse hsg (rightInverse_surjInv _)).injective
Subtype.ext_iff_val.1 (@hif ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (Subtype.eq ha₁a₂))
#align finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le
@[simp]
theorem card_disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h) : (s.disjUnion t h).card = s.card + t.card :=
Multiset.card_add _ _
#align finset.card_disj_union Finset.card_disjUnion
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem card_union_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∪ t).card + (s ∩ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
Finset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a r har h => by by_cases a ∈ s <;>
simp [*, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm _ 1]
#align finset.card_union_add_card_inter Finset.card_union_add_card_inter
theorem card_inter_add_card_union (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∩ t).card + (s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card := by rw [add_comm, card_union_add_card_inter]
#align finset.card_inter_add_card_union Finset.card_inter_add_card_union
lemma card_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card - (s ∩ t).card := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma card_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).card = s.card + t.card - (s ∪ t).card := by
rw [← card_inter_add_card_union, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
theorem card_union_le (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).card ≤ s.card + t.card :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align finset.card_union_le Finset.card_union_le
lemma card_union_eq_card_add_card : (s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter]; simp [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, card_union_of_disjoint⟩ := card_union_eq_card_add_card
#align finset.card_union_eq Finset.card_union_of_disjoint
#align finset.card_disjoint_union Finset.card_union_of_disjoint
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-09")] alias card_union_eq := card_union_of_disjoint
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-09")] alias card_disjoint_union := card_union_of_disjoint
lemma cast_card_inter [AddGroupWithOne R] :
((s ∩ t).card : R) = s.card + t.card - (s ∪ t).card := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← cast_add, card_inter_add_card_union, cast_add]
lemma cast_card_union [AddGroupWithOne R] :
((s ∪ t).card : R) = s.card + t.card - (s ∩ t).card := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← cast_add, card_union_add_card_inter, cast_add]
theorem card_sdiff (h : s ⊆ t) : card (t \ s) = t.card - s.card := by
suffices card (t \ s) = card (t \ s ∪ s) - s.card by rwa [sdiff_union_of_subset h] at this
rw [card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_sdiff Finset.card_sdiff
lemma cast_card_sdiff [AddGroupWithOne R] (h : s ⊆ t) : ((t \ s).card : R) = t.card - s.card := by
rw [card_sdiff h, Nat.cast_sub (card_mono h)]
theorem card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : card (t \ s) + card s = card t :=
((Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (card_le_card h)).mp (card_sdiff h).symm).symm
#align finset.card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card Finset.card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card
theorem le_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) : t.card - s.card ≤ card (t \ s) :=
calc
card t - card s ≤ card t - card (s ∩ t) :=
Nat.sub_le_sub_left (card_le_card inter_subset_left) _
_ = card (t \ (s ∩ t)) := (card_sdiff inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ card (t \ s) := by rw [sdiff_inter_self_right t s]
#align finset.le_card_sdiff Finset.le_card_sdiff
theorem card_le_card_sdiff_add_card : s.card ≤ (s \ t).card + t.card :=
Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 <| le_card_sdiff _ _
#align finset.card_le_card_sdiff_add_card Finset.card_le_card_sdiff_add_card
theorem card_sdiff_add_card : (s \ t).card + t.card = (s ∪ t).card := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
#align finset.card_sdiff_add_card Finset.card_sdiff_add_card
lemma card_sdiff_comm (h : s.card = t.card) : (s \ t).card = (t \ s).card :=
add_left_injective t.card <| by
simp_rw [card_sdiff_add_card, ← h, card_sdiff_add_card, union_comm]
@[simp]
lemma card_sdiff_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
(s \ t).card + (s ∩ t).card = s.card := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_sdiff_inter _ _), sdiff_union_inter]
@[simp]
lemma card_inter_add_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∩ t).card + (s \ t).card = s.card := by
rw [add_comm, card_sdiff_add_card_inter]
end Lattice
theorem filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card
(p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
(s.filter p).card + (s.filter (fun a => ¬ p a)).card = s.card := by
classical
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg _ _ _), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card Finset.filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card
/-- Given a set `A` and a set `B` inside it, we can shrink `A` to any appropriate size, and keep `B`
inside it. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 618 | 636 | theorem exists_intermediate_set {A B : Finset α} (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i + card B ≤ card A) (h₂ : B ⊆ A) :
∃ C : Finset α, B ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A ∧ card C = i + card B := by |
classical
rcases Nat.le.dest h₁ with ⟨k, h⟩
clear h₁
induction' k with k ih generalizing A
· exact ⟨A, h₂, Subset.refl _, h.symm⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : (A \ B).Nonempty := by rw [← card_pos, card_sdiff h₂]; omega
have z : i + card B + k = card (erase A a) := by
rw [card_erase_of_mem (mem_sdiff.1 ha).1, ← h,
Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr k.succ_ne_zero), ← pred_eq_sub_one,
k.pred_succ]
have : B ⊆ A.erase a := by
rintro t th
apply mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem _ (h₂ th)
rintro rfl
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right th ha
rcases ih this z with ⟨B', hB', B'subA', cards⟩
exact ⟨B', hB', B'subA'.trans (erase_subset _ _), cards⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpOrder
#align_import measure_theory.function.l1_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ccdbfb6e5614667af5aa3ab2d50885e0ef44a46f"
/-!
# Integrable functions and `L¹` space
In the first part of this file, the predicate `Integrable` is defined and basic properties of
integrable functions are proved.
Such a predicate is already available under the name `Memℒp 1`. We give a direct definition which
is easier to use, and show that it is equivalent to `Memℒp 1`
In the second part, we establish an API between `Integrable` and the space `L¹` of equivalence
classes of integrable functions, already defined as a special case of `L^p` spaces for `p = 1`.
## Notation
* `α →₁[μ] β` is the type of `L¹` space, where `α` is a `MeasureSpace` and `β` is a
`NormedAddCommGroup` with a `SecondCountableTopology`. `f : α →ₘ β` is a "function" in `L¹`.
In comments, `[f]` is also used to denote an `L¹` function.
`₁` can be typed as `\1`.
## Main definitions
* Let `f : α → β` be a function, where `α` is a `MeasureSpace` and `β` a `NormedAddCommGroup`.
Then `HasFiniteIntegral f` means `(∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊) < ∞`.
* If `β` is moreover a `MeasurableSpace` then `f` is called `Integrable` if
`f` is `Measurable` and `HasFiniteIntegral f` holds.
## Implementation notes
To prove something for an arbitrary integrable function, a useful theorem is
`Integrable.induction` in the file `SetIntegral`.
## Tags
integrable, function space, l1
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} [MeasurableSpace δ]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup β]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup γ]
namespace MeasureTheory
/-! ### Some results about the Lebesgue integral involving a normed group -/
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by simp only [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by
simp only [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_edist_triangle {f g h : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hh : AEStronglyMeasurable h μ) :
(∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (h a) ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, edist (g a) (h a) ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_left' (hf.edist hh)]
refine lintegral_mono fun a => ?_
apply edist_triangle_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_edist_triangle MeasureTheory.lintegral_edist_triangle
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_zero : (∫⁻ _ : α, ‖(0 : β)‖₊ ∂μ) = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_left {f : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (g : α → γ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_left' hf.ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_right (f : α → β) {g : α → γ} (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' _ hg.ennnorm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_neg {f : α → β} : (∫⁻ a, ‖(-f) a‖₊ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, nnnorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg
/-! ### The predicate `HasFiniteIntegral` -/
/-- `HasFiniteIntegral f μ` means that the integral `∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ` is finite.
`HasFiniteIntegral f` means `HasFiniteIntegral f volume`. -/
def HasFiniteIntegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
(∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ ((∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_norm MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, edist_dist, dist_zero_right]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_edist MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) < ∞ := by
rw [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg h]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_of_real MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L1Space.lean | 128 | 130 | theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofNNReal {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) < ∞ := by |
simp [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sigma
#align_import data.finset.sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Finite sets in a sigma type
This file defines a few `Finset` constructions on `Σ i, α i`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sigma`: Given a finset `s` in `ι` and finsets `t i` in each `α i`, `s.sigma t` is the
finset of the dependent sum `Σ i, α i`
* `Finset.sigmaLift`: Lifts maps `α i → β i → Finset (γ i)` to a map
`Σ i, α i → Σ i, β i → Finset (Σ i, γ i)`.
## TODO
`Finset.sigmaLift` can be generalized to any alternative functor. But to make the generalization
worth it, we must first refactor the functor library so that the `alternative` instance for `Finset`
is computable and universe-polymorphic.
-/
open Function Multiset
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sigma
variable {α : ι → Type*} {β : Type*} (s s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
/-- `s.sigma t` is the finset of dependent pairs `⟨i, a⟩` such that `i ∈ s` and `a ∈ t i`. -/
protected def sigma : Finset (Σi, α i) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.sigma fun i => (t i).nodup⟩
#align finset.sigma Finset.sigma
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sigma {a : Σi, α i} : a ∈ s.sigma t ↔ a.1 ∈ s ∧ a.2 ∈ t a.1 :=
Multiset.mem_sigma
#align finset.mem_sigma Finset.mem_sigma
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
(s.sigma t : Set (Σ i, α i)) = (s : Set ι).sigma fun i ↦ (t i : Set (α i)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_sigma
#align finset.coe_sigma Finset.coe_sigma
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem sigma_nonempty : (s.sigma t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, (t i).Nonempty := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.sigma_nonempty Finset.sigma_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem sigma_eq_empty : s.sigma t = ∅ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, t i = ∅ := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, sigma_nonempty, not_exists, not_and]
#align finset.sigma_eq_empty Finset.sigma_eq_empty
@[mono]
theorem sigma_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : ∀ i, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : s₁.sigma t₁ ⊆ s₂.sigma t₂ :=
fun ⟨i, _⟩ h =>
let ⟨hi, ha⟩ := mem_sigma.1 h
mem_sigma.2 ⟨hs hi, ht i ha⟩
#align finset.sigma_mono Finset.sigma_mono
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk :
(s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i) := by
intro i _ j _ hij
rw [Function.onFun, disjoint_left]
simp_rw [mem_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
rintro _ ⟨y, _, rfl⟩ ⟨z, _, hz'⟩
exact hij (congr_arg Sigma.fst hz'.symm)
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_map_sigma_mk Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk
@[simp]
theorem disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk :
s.disjiUnion (fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i)) pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk =
s.sigma t :=
rfl
#align finset.disj_Union_map_sigma_mk Finset.disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk
theorem sigma_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (Σi, α i)] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
s.sigma t = s.biUnion fun i => (t i).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk i := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm]
#align finset.sigma_eq_bUnion Finset.sigma_eq_biUnion
variable (s t) (f : (Σi, α i) → β)
theorem sup_sigma [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] :
(s.sigma t).sup f = s.sup fun i => (t i).sup fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_sigma, and_imp, Sigma.forall]
exact
⟨fun i a hi ha => (le_sup hi).trans' <| le_sup (f := fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) ha, fun i hi a ha =>
le_sup <| mem_sigma.2 ⟨hi, ha⟩⟩
#align finset.sup_sigma Finset.sup_sigma
theorem inf_sigma [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] :
(s.sigma t).inf f = s.inf fun i => (t i).inf fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩ :=
@sup_sigma _ _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sigma Finset.inf_sigma
theorem _root_.biSup_finsetSigma [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → β) : ⨆ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⨆ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f ⟨i, j⟩ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.iSup_coe, Finset.coe_sigma, biSup_sigma]
theorem _root_.biSup_finsetSigma' [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → β) : ⨆ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f i j = ⨆ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
Eq.symm (biSup_finsetSigma _ _ _)
theorem _root_.biInf_finsetSigma [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → β) : ⨅ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⨅ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biSup_finsetSigma (β := βᵒᵈ) _ _ _
theorem _root_.biInf_finsetSigma' [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → β) : ⨅ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f i j = ⨅ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
Eq.symm (biInf_finsetSigma _ _ _)
theorem _root_.Set.biUnion_finsetSigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → Set β) : ⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j ∈ t i, f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biSup_finsetSigma _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biUnion_finsetSigma' (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → Set β) : ⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j ∈ t i, f i j = ⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
biSup_finsetSigma' _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biInter_finsetSigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → Set β) : ⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j ∈ t i, f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biInf_finsetSigma _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biInter_finsetSigma' (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → Set β) : ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j ∈ t i, f i j = ⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.1 ij.2 :=
biInf_finsetSigma' _ _ _
end Sigma
section SigmaLift
variable {α β γ : ι → Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Lifts maps `α i → β i → Finset (γ i)` to a map `Σ i, α i → Σ i, β i → Finset (Σ i, γ i)`. -/
def sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β) :
Finset (Sigma γ) :=
dite (a.1 = b.1) (fun h => (f (h ▸ a.2) b.2).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk _) fun _ => ∅
#align finset.sigma_lift Finset.sigmaLift
theorem mem_sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β)
(x : Sigma γ) :
x ∈ sigmaLift f a b ↔ ∃ (ha : a.1 = x.1) (hb : b.1 = x.1), x.2 ∈ f (ha ▸ a.2) (hb ▸ b.2) := by
obtain ⟨⟨i, a⟩, j, b⟩ := a, b
obtain rfl | h := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· constructor
· simp_rw [sigmaLift]
simp only [dite_eq_ite, ite_true, mem_map, Embedding.sigmaMk_apply, forall_exists_index,
and_imp]
rintro x hx rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, hx⟩
rw [sigmaLift, dif_pos rfl, mem_map]
exact ⟨_, hx, by simp [Sigma.ext_iff]⟩
· rw [sigmaLift, dif_neg h]
refine iff_of_false (not_mem_empty _) ?_
rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, _⟩
exact h rfl
#align finset.mem_sigma_lift Finset.mem_sigmaLift
theorem mk_mem_sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (i : ι) (a : α i) (b : β i)
(x : γ i) : (⟨i, x⟩ : Sigma γ) ∈ sigmaLift f ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨i, b⟩ ↔ x ∈ f a b := by
rw [sigmaLift, dif_pos rfl, mem_map]
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx, _, rfl⟩
exact hx
#align finset.mk_mem_sigma_lift Finset.mk_mem_sigmaLift
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sigma.lean | 184 | 187 | theorem not_mem_sigmaLift_of_ne_left (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α)
(b : Sigma β) (x : Sigma γ) (h : a.1 ≠ x.1) : x ∉ sigmaLift f a b := by |
rw [mem_sigmaLift]
exact fun H => h H.fst
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.prod.integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Integration with respect to the product measure
In this file we prove Fubini's theorem.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.integrable_prod_iff` states that a binary function is integrable iff both
* `y ↦ f (x, y)` is integrable for almost every `x`, and
* the function `x ↦ ∫ ‖f (x, y)‖ dy` is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.integral_prod`: Fubini's theorem. It states that for an integrable function
`α × β → E` (where `E` is a second countable Banach space) we have
`∫ z, f z ∂(μ.prod ν) = ∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ`. This theorem has the same variants as
Tonelli's theorem (see `MeasureTheory.lintegral_prod`). The lemma
`MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_prod_right` states that the inner integral of the right-hand
side is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.integral_integral_swap_of_hasCompactSupport`: a version of Fubini theorem for
continuous functions with compact support, which does not assume that the measures are σ-finite
contrary to all the usual versions of Fubini.
## Tags
product measure, Fubini's theorem, Fubini-Tonelli theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open TopologicalSpace
open Filter hiding prod_eq map
variable {α α' β β' γ E : Type*}
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α'] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β']
variable [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ' : Measure α} {ν ν' : Measure β} {τ : Measure γ}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-! ### Measurability
Before we define the product measure, we can talk about the measurability of operations on binary
functions. We show that if `f` is a binary measurable function, then the function that integrates
along one of the variables (using either the Lebesgue or Bochner integral) is measurable.
-/
theorem measurableSet_integrable [SigmaFinite ν] ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : MeasurableSet {x | Integrable (f x) ν} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.of_uncurry_left.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and_iff]
exact measurableSet_lt (Measurable.lintegral_prod_right hf.ennnorm) measurable_const
#align measurable_set_integrable measurableSet_integrable
section
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
Fubini's theorem is measurable.
This version has `f` in curried form. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right [SigmaFinite ν] ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f x y ∂ν := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap; · simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
haveI : SeparableSpace (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc (α × β) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let s' : ℕ → α → SimpleFunc β E := fun n x => (s n).comp (Prod.mk x) measurable_prod_mk_left
let f' : ℕ → α → E := fun n => {x | Integrable (f x) ν}.indicator fun x => (s' n x).integral ν
have hf' : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f' n) := by
intro n; refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_integrable hf)
have : ∀ x, ((s' n x).range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ (s n).range := by
intro x; refine Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.filter_subset _ _) ?_; intro y
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range]; rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩; exact ⟨(x, z), rfl⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset (this _)]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun x _ => ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
simp only [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp, preimage_comp]
apply measurable_measure_prod_mk_left
exact (s n).measurableSet_fiber x
have h2f' : Tendsto f' atTop (𝓝 fun x : α => ∫ y : β, f x y ∂ν) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable (f x) ν
· have (n) : Integrable (s' n x) ν := by
apply (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm).mono' (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simp_rw [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp]; exact SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
simp only [f', hfx, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (this _), indicator_of_mem,
mem_setOf_eq]
refine
tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun y => ‖f x y‖ + ‖f x y‖)
(fun n => (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable) (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm) ?_ ?_
· refine fun n => eventually_of_forall fun y =>
SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le ?_ ?_ (x, y) n
-- Porting note: Lean 3 solved the following two subgoals on its own
· exact hf.measurable
· simp
· refine eventually_of_forall fun y => SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn ?_ ?_ ?_
-- Porting note: Lean 3 solved the following two subgoals on its own
· exact hf.measurable.of_uncurry_left
· simp
apply subset_closure
simp [-uncurry_apply_pair]
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
exact stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ hf' h2f'
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_right MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
Fubini's theorem is measurable. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right' [SigmaFinite ν] ⦃f : α × β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂ν := by
rw [← uncurry_curry f] at hf; exact hf.integral_prod_right
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_right' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right'
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
the symmetric version of Fubini's theorem is measurable.
This version has `f` in curried form. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left [SigmaFinite μ] ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f x y ∂μ :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_prod_right'
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_left MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
the symmetric version of Fubini's theorem is measurable. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left' [SigmaFinite μ] ⦃f : α × β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂μ :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_prod_right'
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_left' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left'
end
/-! ### The product measure -/
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
variable [SigmaFinite ν]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Prod/Integral.lean | 158 | 167 | theorem integrable_measure_prod_mk_left {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (μ.prod ν) s ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun x => (ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s)).toReal) μ := by |
refine ⟨(measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs).ennreal_toReal.aemeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg]
convert h2s.lt_top using 1
-- Porting note: was `simp_rw`
rw [prod_apply hs]
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [ae_measure_lt_top hs h2s] with x hx
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top] at hx; simp [ofReal_toReal, hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Units
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import ring_theory.coprime.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a95b16cbade0f938fc24abd05412bde1e84bab9b"
/-!
# Coprime elements of a ring or monoid
## Main definition
* `IsCoprime x y`: that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors (`IsRelPrime`) are not
necessarily coprime, e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime.
The two notions are equivalent in Bézout rings, see `isRelPrime_iff_isCoprime`.
This file also contains lemmas about `IsRelPrime` parallel to `IsCoprime`.
See also `RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas` for further development of coprime elements.
-/
universe u v
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (x y z : R)
/-- The proposition that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors are not necessarily coprime,
e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime. -/
def IsCoprime : Prop :=
∃ a b, a * x + b * y = 1
#align is_coprime IsCoprime
variable {x y z}
@[symm]
theorem IsCoprime.symm (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime y x :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H
⟨b, a, by rw [add_comm, H]⟩
#align is_coprime.symm IsCoprime.symm
theorem isCoprime_comm : IsCoprime x y ↔ IsCoprime y x :=
⟨IsCoprime.symm, IsCoprime.symm⟩
#align is_coprime_comm isCoprime_comm
theorem isCoprime_self : IsCoprime x x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x (a + b) <| by rwa [mul_comm, add_mul], fun h =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 h
⟨b, 0, by rwa [zero_mul, add_zero]⟩⟩
#align is_coprime_self isCoprime_self
theorem isCoprime_zero_left : IsCoprime 0 x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, H⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x b <| by rwa [mul_zero, zero_add, mul_comm] at H, fun H =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 H
⟨1, b, by rwa [one_mul, zero_add]⟩⟩
#align is_coprime_zero_left isCoprime_zero_left
theorem isCoprime_zero_right : IsCoprime x 0 ↔ IsUnit x :=
isCoprime_comm.trans isCoprime_zero_left
#align is_coprime_zero_right isCoprime_zero_right
theorem not_isCoprime_zero_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬IsCoprime (0 : R) 0 :=
mt isCoprime_zero_right.mp not_isUnit_zero
#align not_coprime_zero_zero not_isCoprime_zero_zero
lemma IsCoprime.intCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {a b : ℤ} (h : IsCoprime a b) :
IsCoprime (a : R) (b : R) := by
rcases h with ⟨u, v, H⟩
use u, v
rw_mod_cast [H]
exact Int.cast_one
/-- If a 2-vector `p` satisfies `IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)`, then `p ≠ 0`. -/
theorem IsCoprime.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {p : Fin 2 → R} (h : IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)) : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact not_isCoprime_zero_zero h
#align is_coprime.ne_zero IsCoprime.ne_zero
theorem IsCoprime.ne_zero_or_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (h : IsCoprime x y) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
apply not_or_of_imp
rintro rfl rfl
exact not_isCoprime_zero_zero h
theorem isCoprime_one_left : IsCoprime 1 x :=
⟨1, 0, by rw [one_mul, zero_mul, add_zero]⟩
#align is_coprime_one_left isCoprime_one_left
theorem isCoprime_one_right : IsCoprime x 1 :=
⟨0, 1, by rw [one_mul, zero_mul, zero_add]⟩
#align is_coprime_one_right isCoprime_one_right
theorem IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right (H1 : IsCoprime x z) (H2 : x ∣ y * z) : x ∣ y := by
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H1
rw [← mul_one y, ← H, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) (H2.mul_left _)
#align is_coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
theorem IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left (H1 : IsCoprime x y) (H2 : x ∣ y * z) : x ∣ z := by
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H1
rw [← one_mul z, ← H, add_mul, mul_right_comm, mul_assoc b]
exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) (H2.mul_left _)
#align is_coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
theorem IsCoprime.mul_left (H1 : IsCoprime x z) (H2 : IsCoprime y z) : IsCoprime (x * y) z :=
let ⟨a, b, h1⟩ := H1
let ⟨c, d, h2⟩ := H2
⟨a * c, a * x * d + b * c * y + b * d * z,
calc a * c * (x * y) + (a * x * d + b * c * y + b * d * z) * z
_ = (a * x + b * z) * (c * y + d * z) := by ring
_ = 1 := by rw [h1, h2, mul_one]
⟩
#align is_coprime.mul_left IsCoprime.mul_left
theorem IsCoprime.mul_right (H1 : IsCoprime x y) (H2 : IsCoprime x z) : IsCoprime x (y * z) := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at H1 H2 ⊢
exact H1.mul_left H2
#align is_coprime.mul_right IsCoprime.mul_right
theorem IsCoprime.mul_dvd (H : IsCoprime x y) (H1 : x ∣ z) (H2 : y ∣ z) : x * y ∣ z := by
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
rw [← mul_one z, ← h, mul_add]
apply dvd_add
· rw [mul_comm z, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_dvd_mul_left _ H2).mul_left _
· rw [mul_comm b, ← mul_assoc]
exact (mul_dvd_mul_right H1 _).mul_right _
#align is_coprime.mul_dvd IsCoprime.mul_dvd
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left (H : IsCoprime (x * y) z) : IsCoprime x z :=
let ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
⟨a * y, b, by rwa [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc]⟩
#align is_coprime.of_mul_left_left IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_left_right (H : IsCoprime (x * y) z) : IsCoprime y z := by
rw [mul_comm] at H
exact H.of_mul_left_left
#align is_coprime.of_mul_left_right IsCoprime.of_mul_left_right
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (H : IsCoprime x (y * z)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at H ⊢
exact H.of_mul_left_left
#align is_coprime.of_mul_right_left IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (H : IsCoprime x (y * z)) : IsCoprime x z := by
rw [mul_comm] at H
exact H.of_mul_right_left
#align is_coprime.of_mul_right_right IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right
theorem IsCoprime.mul_left_iff : IsCoprime (x * y) z ↔ IsCoprime x z ∧ IsCoprime y z :=
⟨fun H => ⟨H.of_mul_left_left, H.of_mul_left_right⟩, fun ⟨H1, H2⟩ => H1.mul_left H2⟩
#align is_coprime.mul_left_iff IsCoprime.mul_left_iff
theorem IsCoprime.mul_right_iff : IsCoprime x (y * z) ↔ IsCoprime x y ∧ IsCoprime x z := by
rw [isCoprime_comm, IsCoprime.mul_left_iff, isCoprime_comm, @isCoprime_comm _ _ z]
#align is_coprime.mul_right_iff IsCoprime.mul_right_iff
theorem IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left (h : IsCoprime y z) (hdvd : x ∣ y) : IsCoprime x z := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := hdvd
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left h
#align is_coprime.of_coprime_of_dvd_left IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_right (h : IsCoprime z y) (hdvd : x ∣ y) : IsCoprime z x :=
(h.symm.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left hdvd).symm
#align is_coprime.of_coprime_of_dvd_right IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_right
theorem IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd (H : IsCoprime x y) (d : x ∣ y) : IsUnit x :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := d
isCoprime_self.1 <| IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left <| show IsCoprime x (x * k) from hk ▸ H
#align is_coprime.is_unit_of_dvd IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd
theorem IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' {a b x : R} (h : IsCoprime a b) (ha : x ∣ a) (hb : x ∣ b) :
IsUnit x :=
(h.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left ha).isUnit_of_dvd hb
#align is_coprime.is_unit_of_dvd' IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd'
theorem IsCoprime.isRelPrime {a b : R} (h : IsCoprime a b) : IsRelPrime a b :=
fun _ ↦ h.isUnit_of_dvd'
theorem IsCoprime.map (H : IsCoprime x y) {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) :
IsCoprime (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
⟨f a, f b, by rw [← f.map_mul, ← f.map_mul, ← f.map_add, h, f.map_one]⟩
#align is_coprime.map IsCoprime.map
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_left (h : IsCoprime (x + y * z) y) : IsCoprime x y :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := h
⟨a, a * z + b, by
simpa only [add_mul, mul_add, add_assoc, add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm] using H⟩
#align is_coprime.of_add_mul_left_left IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_right_left (h : IsCoprime (x + z * y) y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
#align is_coprime.of_add_mul_right_left IsCoprime.of_add_mul_right_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right (h : IsCoprime x (y + x * z)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at h ⊢
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
#align is_coprime.of_add_mul_left_right IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_right_right (h : IsCoprime x (y + z * x)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_right
#align is_coprime.of_add_mul_right_right IsCoprime.of_add_mul_right_right
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_left_left (h : IsCoprime (y * z + x) y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
#align is_coprime.of_mul_add_left_left IsCoprime.of_mul_add_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_right_left (h : IsCoprime (z * y + x) y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_right_left
#align is_coprime.of_mul_add_right_left IsCoprime.of_mul_add_right_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_left_right (h : IsCoprime x (x * z + y)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_right
#align is_coprime.of_mul_add_left_right IsCoprime.of_mul_add_left_right
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_right_right (h : IsCoprime x (z * x + y)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_right_right
#align is_coprime.of_mul_add_right_right IsCoprime.of_mul_add_right_right
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_left_left (h : IsRelPrime (x + y * z) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
fun _ hx hy ↦ h (dvd_add hx <| dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hy z) hy
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_right_left (h : IsRelPrime (x + z * y) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(mul_comm z y ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_left_right (h : IsRelPrime x (y + x * z)) : IsRelPrime x y := by
rw [isRelPrime_comm] at h ⊢
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_right_right (h : IsRelPrime x (y + z * x)) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(mul_comm z x ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_right
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_left_left (h : IsRelPrime (y * z + x) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ x ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_right_left (h : IsRelPrime (z * y + x) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ x ▸ h).of_add_mul_right_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_left_right (h : IsRelPrime x (x * z + y)) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ y ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_right
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_right_right (h : IsRelPrime x (z * x + y)) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ y ▸ h).of_add_mul_right_right
end CommSemiring
section ScalarTower
variable {R G : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Group G] [MulAction G R] [SMulCommClass G R R]
[IsScalarTower G R R] (x : G) (y z : R)
theorem isCoprime_group_smul_left : IsCoprime (x • y) z ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ => ⟨x • a, b, by rwa [smul_mul_assoc, ← mul_smul_comm]⟩, fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ =>
⟨x⁻¹ • a, b, by rwa [smul_mul_smul, inv_mul_self, one_smul]⟩⟩
#align is_coprime_group_smul_left isCoprime_group_smul_left
theorem isCoprime_group_smul_right : IsCoprime y (x • z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
isCoprime_comm.trans <| (isCoprime_group_smul_left x z y).trans isCoprime_comm
#align is_coprime_group_smul_right isCoprime_group_smul_right
theorem isCoprime_group_smul : IsCoprime (x • y) (x • z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
(isCoprime_group_smul_left x y (x • z)).trans (isCoprime_group_smul_right x y z)
#align is_coprime_group_smul isCoprime_group_smul
end ScalarTower
section CommSemiringUnit
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {x : R} (hu : IsUnit x) (y z : R)
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_left_left : IsCoprime (x * y) z ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hu
hu ▸ isCoprime_group_smul_left u y z
#align is_coprime_mul_unit_left_left isCoprime_mul_unit_left_left
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_left_right : IsCoprime y (x * z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hu
hu ▸ isCoprime_group_smul_right u y z
#align is_coprime_mul_unit_left_right isCoprime_mul_unit_left_right
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_left : IsCoprime (x * y) (x * z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
(isCoprime_mul_unit_left_left hu y (x * z)).trans (isCoprime_mul_unit_left_right hu y z)
#align is_coprime_mul_unit_left isCoprime_mul_unit_left
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_right_left : IsCoprime (y * x) z ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
mul_comm x y ▸ isCoprime_mul_unit_left_left hu y z
#align is_coprime_mul_unit_right_left isCoprime_mul_unit_right_left
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_right_right : IsCoprime y (z * x) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
mul_comm x z ▸ isCoprime_mul_unit_left_right hu y z
#align is_coprime_mul_unit_right_right isCoprime_mul_unit_right_right
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_right : IsCoprime (y * x) (z * x) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
(isCoprime_mul_unit_right_left hu y (z * x)).trans (isCoprime_mul_unit_right_right hu y z)
#align is_coprime_mul_unit_right isCoprime_mul_unit_right
end CommSemiringUnit
namespace IsCoprime
section CommRing
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
theorem add_mul_left_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (x + y * z) y :=
@of_add_mul_left_left R _ _ _ (-z) <| by simpa only [mul_neg, add_neg_cancel_right] using h
#align is_coprime.add_mul_left_left IsCoprime.add_mul_left_left
theorem add_mul_right_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (x + z * y) y := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact h.add_mul_left_left z
#align is_coprime.add_mul_right_left IsCoprime.add_mul_right_left
theorem add_mul_left_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (y + x * z) := by
rw [isCoprime_comm]
exact h.symm.add_mul_left_left z
#align is_coprime.add_mul_left_right IsCoprime.add_mul_left_right
theorem add_mul_right_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (y + z * x) := by
rw [isCoprime_comm]
exact h.symm.add_mul_right_left z
#align is_coprime.add_mul_right_right IsCoprime.add_mul_right_right
theorem mul_add_left_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (y * z + x) y := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_left_left z
#align is_coprime.mul_add_left_left IsCoprime.mul_add_left_left
theorem mul_add_right_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (z * y + x) y := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_right_left z
#align is_coprime.mul_add_right_left IsCoprime.mul_add_right_left
theorem mul_add_left_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (x * z + y) := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_left_right z
#align is_coprime.mul_add_left_right IsCoprime.mul_add_left_right
theorem mul_add_right_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (z * x + y) := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_right_right z
#align is_coprime.mul_add_right_right IsCoprime.mul_add_right_right
theorem add_mul_left_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (x + y * z) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_left_left, fun h => h.add_mul_left_left z⟩
#align is_coprime.add_mul_left_left_iff IsCoprime.add_mul_left_left_iff
theorem add_mul_right_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (x + z * y) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_right_left, fun h => h.add_mul_right_left z⟩
#align is_coprime.add_mul_right_left_iff IsCoprime.add_mul_right_left_iff
theorem add_mul_left_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (y + x * z) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_left_right, fun h => h.add_mul_left_right z⟩
#align is_coprime.add_mul_left_right_iff IsCoprime.add_mul_left_right_iff
theorem add_mul_right_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (y + z * x) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_right_right, fun h => h.add_mul_right_right z⟩
#align is_coprime.add_mul_right_right_iff IsCoprime.add_mul_right_right_iff
theorem mul_add_left_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (y * z + x) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_left_left, fun h => h.mul_add_left_left z⟩
#align is_coprime.mul_add_left_left_iff IsCoprime.mul_add_left_left_iff
theorem mul_add_right_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (z * y + x) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_right_left, fun h => h.mul_add_right_left z⟩
#align is_coprime.mul_add_right_left_iff IsCoprime.mul_add_right_left_iff
theorem mul_add_left_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (x * z + y) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_left_right, fun h => h.mul_add_left_right z⟩
#align is_coprime.mul_add_left_right_iff IsCoprime.mul_add_left_right_iff
theorem mul_add_right_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (z * x + y) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_right_right, fun h => h.mul_add_right_right z⟩
#align is_coprime.mul_add_right_right_iff IsCoprime.mul_add_right_right_iff
theorem neg_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (-x) y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := h
use -a, b
rwa [neg_mul_neg]
#align is_coprime.neg_left IsCoprime.neg_left
theorem neg_left_iff (x y : R) : IsCoprime (-x) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg x ▸ h.neg_left, neg_left⟩
#align is_coprime.neg_left_iff IsCoprime.neg_left_iff
theorem neg_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime x (-y) :=
h.symm.neg_left.symm
#align is_coprime.neg_right IsCoprime.neg_right
theorem neg_right_iff (x y : R) : IsCoprime x (-y) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg y ▸ h.neg_right, neg_right⟩
#align is_coprime.neg_right_iff IsCoprime.neg_right_iff
theorem neg_neg {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (-x) (-y) :=
h.neg_left.neg_right
#align is_coprime.neg_neg IsCoprime.neg_neg
theorem neg_neg_iff (x y : R) : IsCoprime (-x) (-y) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
(neg_left_iff _ _).trans (neg_right_iff _ _)
#align is_coprime.neg_neg_iff IsCoprime.neg_neg_iff
end CommRing
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Basic.lean | 421 | 430 | theorem sq_add_sq_ne_zero {R : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing R] {a b : R} (h : IsCoprime a b) :
a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 ≠ 0 := by |
intro h'
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff'
--Porting TODO: replace with sq_nonneg when that file is ported
(by rw [pow_two]; exact mul_self_nonneg _)
(by rw [pow_two]; exact mul_self_nonneg _)).mp h'
obtain rfl := pow_eq_zero ha
obtain rfl := pow_eq_zero hb
exact not_isCoprime_zero_zero h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Balanced
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.WellPowered
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Opposite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import category_theory.generator from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f187f1074fa1857c94589cc653c786cadc4c35ff"
/-!
# Separating and detecting sets
There are several non-equivalent notions of a generator of a category. Here, we consider two of
them:
* We say that `𝒢` is a separating set if the functors `C(G, -)` for `G ∈ 𝒢` are collectively
faithful, i.e., if `h ≫ f = h ≫ g` for all `h` with domain in `𝒢` implies `f = g`.
* We say that `𝒢` is a detecting set if the functors `C(G, -)` collectively reflect isomorphisms,
i.e., if any `h` with domain in `𝒢` uniquely factors through `f`, then `f` is an isomorphism.
There are, of course, also the dual notions of coseparating and codetecting sets.
## Main results
We
* define predicates `IsSeparating`, `IsCoseparating`, `IsDetecting` and `IsCodetecting` on
sets of objects;
* show that separating and coseparating are dual notions;
* show that detecting and codetecting are dual notions;
* show that if `C` has equalizers, then detecting implies separating;
* show that if `C` has coequalizers, then codetecting implies separating;
* show that if `C` is balanced, then separating implies detecting and coseparating implies
codetecting;
* show that `∅` is separating if and only if `∅` is coseparating if and only if `C` is thin;
* show that `∅` is detecting if and only if `∅` is codetecting if and only if `C` is a groupoid;
* define predicates `IsSeparator`, `IsCoseparator`, `IsDetector` and `IsCodetector` as the
singleton counterparts to the definitions for sets above and restate the above results in this
situation;
* show that `G` is a separator if and only if `coyoneda.obj (op G)` is faithful (and the dual);
* show that `G` is a detector if and only if `coyoneda.obj (op G)` reflects isomorphisms (and the
dual).
## Future work
* We currently don't have any examples yet.
* We will want typeclasses `HasSeparator C` and similar.
-/
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a separating set if the functors `C(G, -)` for `G ∈ 𝒢` are collectively
faithful, i.e., if `h ≫ f = h ≫ g` for all `h` with domain in `𝒢` implies `f = g`. -/
def IsSeparating (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f g : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : G ⟶ X), h ≫ f = h ≫ g) → f = g
#align category_theory.is_separating CategoryTheory.IsSeparating
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a coseparating set if the functors `C(-, G)` for `G ∈ 𝒢` are collectively
faithful, i.e., if `f ≫ h = g ≫ h` for all `h` with codomain in `𝒢` implies `f = g`. -/
def IsCoseparating (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f g : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : Y ⟶ G), f ≫ h = g ≫ h) → f = g
#align category_theory.is_coseparating CategoryTheory.IsCoseparating
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a detecting set if the functors `C(G, -)` collectively reflect isomorphisms,
i.e., if any `h` with domain in `𝒢` uniquely factors through `f`, then `f` is an isomorphism. -/
def IsDetecting (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : G ⟶ Y), ∃! h' : G ⟶ X, h' ≫ f = h) → IsIso f
#align category_theory.is_detecting CategoryTheory.IsDetecting
/-- We say that `𝒢` is a codetecting set if the functors `C(-, G)` collectively reflect
isomorphisms, i.e., if any `h` with codomain in `G` uniquely factors through `f`, then `f` is
an isomorphism. -/
def IsCodetecting (𝒢 : Set C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), (∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ (h : X ⟶ G), ∃! h' : Y ⟶ G, f ≫ h' = h) → IsIso f
#align category_theory.is_codetecting CategoryTheory.IsCodetecting
section Dual
theorem isSeparating_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsSeparating 𝒢.op ↔ IsCoseparating 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_⟩
· refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op] using hfg _ (Set.mem_op.1 hG) _
· refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop] using hfg _ (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) _
#align category_theory.is_separating_op_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparating_op_iff
theorem isCoseparating_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsCoseparating 𝒢.op ↔ IsSeparating 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f g hfg => ?_⟩
· refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op] using hfg _ (Set.mem_op.1 hG) _
· refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop] using hfg _ (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) _
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_op_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_op_iff
theorem isCoseparating_unop_iff (𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ) : IsCoseparating 𝒢.unop ↔ IsSeparating 𝒢 := by
rw [← isSeparating_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_unop_iff
theorem isSeparating_unop_iff (𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ) : IsSeparating 𝒢.unop ↔ IsCoseparating 𝒢 := by
rw [← isCoseparating_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_separating_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparating_unop_iff
theorem isDetecting_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsDetecting 𝒢.op ↔ IsCodetecting 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_⟩
· refine (isIso_op_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (unop G) (Set.mem_op.1 hG) h.unop
exact
⟨t.op, Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (ht' _ (Quiver.Hom.op_inj hy))⟩
· refine (isIso_unop_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (op G) (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) h.op
refine ⟨t.unop, Quiver.Hom.op_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.op_inj (ht' _ ?_)⟩
exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simpa only using hy)
#align category_theory.is_detecting_op_iff CategoryTheory.isDetecting_op_iff
theorem isCodetecting_op_iff (𝒢 : Set C) : IsCodetecting 𝒢.op ↔ IsDetecting 𝒢 := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_, fun h𝒢 X Y f hf => ?_⟩
· refine (isIso_op_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (unop G) (Set.mem_op.1 hG) h.unop
exact
⟨t.op, Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (ht' _ (Quiver.Hom.op_inj hy))⟩
· refine (isIso_unop_iff _).1 (h𝒢 _ fun G hG h => ?_)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hf (op G) (Set.op_mem_op.2 hG) h.op
refine ⟨t.unop, Quiver.Hom.op_inj ht, fun y hy => Quiver.Hom.op_inj (ht' _ ?_)⟩
exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simpa only using hy)
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_op_iff CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_op_iff
theorem isDetecting_unop_iff (𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ) : IsDetecting 𝒢.unop ↔ IsCodetecting 𝒢 := by
rw [← isCodetecting_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_detecting_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isDetecting_unop_iff
theorem isCodetecting_unop_iff {𝒢 : Set Cᵒᵖ} : IsCodetecting 𝒢.unop ↔ IsDetecting 𝒢 := by
rw [← isDetecting_op_iff, Set.unop_op]
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_unop_iff
end Dual
theorem IsDetecting.isSeparating [HasEqualizers C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) :
IsSeparating 𝒢 := fun _ _ f g hfg =>
have : IsIso (equalizer.ι f g) := h𝒢 _ fun _ hG _ => equalizer.existsUnique _ (hfg _ hG _)
eq_of_epi_equalizer
#align category_theory.is_detecting.is_separating CategoryTheory.IsDetecting.isSeparating
section
theorem IsCodetecting.isCoseparating [HasCoequalizers C] {𝒢 : Set C} :
IsCodetecting 𝒢 → IsCoseparating 𝒢 := by
simpa only [← isSeparating_op_iff, ← isDetecting_op_iff] using IsDetecting.isSeparating
#align category_theory.is_codetecting.is_coseparating CategoryTheory.IsCodetecting.isCoseparating
end
theorem IsSeparating.isDetecting [Balanced C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) :
IsDetecting 𝒢 := by
intro X Y f hf
refine
(isIso_iff_mono_and_epi _).2 ⟨⟨fun g h hgh => h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG i => ?_⟩, ⟨fun g h hgh => ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨t, -, ht⟩ := hf G hG (i ≫ g ≫ f)
rw [ht (i ≫ g) (Category.assoc _ _ _), ht (i ≫ h) (hgh.symm ▸ Category.assoc _ _ _)]
· refine h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG i => ?_
obtain ⟨t, rfl, -⟩ := hf G hG i
rw [Category.assoc, hgh, Category.assoc]
#align category_theory.is_separating.is_detecting CategoryTheory.IsSeparating.isDetecting
section
attribute [local instance] balanced_opposite
theorem IsCoseparating.isCodetecting [Balanced C] {𝒢 : Set C} :
IsCoseparating 𝒢 → IsCodetecting 𝒢 := by
simpa only [← isDetecting_op_iff, ← isSeparating_op_iff] using IsSeparating.isDetecting
#align category_theory.is_coseparating.is_codetecting CategoryTheory.IsCoseparating.isCodetecting
end
theorem isDetecting_iff_isSeparating [HasEqualizers C] [Balanced C] (𝒢 : Set C) :
IsDetecting 𝒢 ↔ IsSeparating 𝒢 :=
⟨IsDetecting.isSeparating, IsSeparating.isDetecting⟩
#align category_theory.is_detecting_iff_is_separating CategoryTheory.isDetecting_iff_isSeparating
theorem isCodetecting_iff_isCoseparating [HasCoequalizers C] [Balanced C] {𝒢 : Set C} :
IsCodetecting 𝒢 ↔ IsCoseparating 𝒢 :=
⟨IsCodetecting.isCoseparating, IsCoseparating.isCodetecting⟩
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_iff_is_coseparating CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_iff_isCoseparating
section Mono
theorem IsSeparating.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsSeparating ℋ := fun _ _ _ _ hfg => h𝒢 _ _ fun _ hG _ => hfg _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_separating.mono CategoryTheory.IsSeparating.mono
theorem IsCoseparating.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsCoseparating 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsCoseparating ℋ := fun _ _ _ _ hfg => h𝒢 _ _ fun _ hG _ => hfg _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_coseparating.mono CategoryTheory.IsCoseparating.mono
theorem IsDetecting.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsDetecting ℋ := fun _ _ _ hf => h𝒢 _ fun _ hG _ => hf _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_detecting.mono CategoryTheory.IsDetecting.mono
theorem IsCodetecting.mono {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsCodetecting 𝒢) {ℋ : Set C} (h𝒢ℋ : 𝒢 ⊆ ℋ) :
IsCodetecting ℋ := fun _ _ _ hf => h𝒢 _ fun _ hG _ => hf _ (h𝒢ℋ hG) _
#align category_theory.is_codetecting.mono CategoryTheory.IsCodetecting.mono
end Mono
section Empty
theorem thin_of_isSeparating_empty (h : IsSeparating (∅ : Set C)) : Quiver.IsThin C := fun _ _ =>
⟨fun _ _ => h _ _ fun _ => False.elim⟩
#align category_theory.thin_of_is_separating_empty CategoryTheory.thin_of_isSeparating_empty
theorem isSeparating_empty_of_thin [Quiver.IsThin C] : IsSeparating (∅ : Set C) :=
fun _ _ _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align category_theory.is_separating_empty_of_thin CategoryTheory.isSeparating_empty_of_thin
theorem thin_of_isCoseparating_empty (h : IsCoseparating (∅ : Set C)) : Quiver.IsThin C :=
fun _ _ => ⟨fun _ _ => h _ _ fun _ => False.elim⟩
#align category_theory.thin_of_is_coseparating_empty CategoryTheory.thin_of_isCoseparating_empty
theorem isCoseparating_empty_of_thin [Quiver.IsThin C] : IsCoseparating (∅ : Set C) :=
fun _ _ _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_empty_of_thin CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_empty_of_thin
theorem groupoid_of_isDetecting_empty (h : IsDetecting (∅ : Set C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsIso f :=
h _ fun _ => False.elim
#align category_theory.groupoid_of_is_detecting_empty CategoryTheory.groupoid_of_isDetecting_empty
theorem isDetecting_empty_of_groupoid [∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), IsIso f] :
IsDetecting (∅ : Set C) := fun _ _ _ _ => inferInstance
#align category_theory.is_detecting_empty_of_groupoid CategoryTheory.isDetecting_empty_of_groupoid
theorem groupoid_of_isCodetecting_empty (h : IsCodetecting (∅ : Set C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsIso f :=
h _ fun _ => False.elim
#align category_theory.groupoid_of_is_codetecting_empty CategoryTheory.groupoid_of_isCodetecting_empty
theorem isCodetecting_empty_of_groupoid [∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), IsIso f] :
IsCodetecting (∅ : Set C) := fun _ _ _ _ => inferInstance
#align category_theory.is_codetecting_empty_of_groupoid CategoryTheory.isCodetecting_empty_of_groupoid
end Empty
theorem isSeparating_iff_epi (𝒢 : Set C)
[∀ A : C, HasCoproduct fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, (G : C) ⟶ A => (f.1 : C)] :
IsSeparating 𝒢 ↔ ∀ A : C, Epi (Sigma.desc (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => (G : C) ⟶ A)) := by
refine ⟨fun h A => ⟨fun u v huv => h _ _ fun G hG f => ?_⟩, fun h X Y f g hh => ?_⟩
· simpa using Sigma.ι (fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, (G : C) ⟶ A => (f.1 : C)) ⟨⟨G, hG⟩, f⟩ ≫= huv
· haveI := h X
refine
(cancel_epi (Sigma.desc (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => (G : C) ⟶ X))).1 (colimit.hom_ext fun j => ?_)
simpa using hh j.as.1.1 j.as.1.2 j.as.2
#align category_theory.is_separating_iff_epi CategoryTheory.isSeparating_iff_epi
theorem isCoseparating_iff_mono (𝒢 : Set C)
[∀ A : C, HasProduct fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C) => (f.1 : C)] :
IsCoseparating 𝒢 ↔ ∀ A : C, Mono (Pi.lift (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => A ⟶ (G : C))) := by
refine ⟨fun h A => ⟨fun u v huv => h _ _ fun G hG f => ?_⟩, fun h X Y f g hh => ?_⟩
· simpa using huv =≫ Pi.π (fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C) => (f.1 : C)) ⟨⟨G, hG⟩, f⟩
· haveI := h Y
refine (cancel_mono (Pi.lift (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => Y ⟶ (G : C)))).1 (limit.hom_ext fun j => ?_)
simpa using hh j.as.1.1 j.as.1.2 j.as.2
#align category_theory.is_coseparating_iff_mono CategoryTheory.isCoseparating_iff_mono
/-- An ingredient of the proof of the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem: a complete well-powered
category with a small coseparating set has an initial object.
In fact, it follows from the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem that `C` is already cocomplete,
see `hasColimits_of_hasLimits_of_isCoseparating`. -/
theorem hasInitial_of_isCoseparating [WellPowered C] [HasLimits C] {𝒢 : Set C} [Small.{v₁} 𝒢]
(h𝒢 : IsCoseparating 𝒢) : HasInitial C := by
haveI : HasProductsOfShape 𝒢 C := hasProductsOfShape_of_small C 𝒢
haveI := fun A => hasProductsOfShape_of_small.{v₁} C (ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C))
letI := completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Subobject (piObj (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C)))
suffices ∀ A : C, Unique (((⊥ : Subobject (piObj (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C))) : C) ⟶ A) by
exact hasInitial_of_unique ((⊥ : Subobject (piObj (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C))) : C)
refine fun A => ⟨⟨?_⟩, fun f => ?_⟩
· let s := Pi.lift fun f : ΣG : 𝒢, A ⟶ (G : C) => id (Pi.π (Subtype.val : 𝒢 → C)) f.1
let t := Pi.lift (@Sigma.snd 𝒢 fun G => A ⟶ (G : C))
haveI : Mono t := (isCoseparating_iff_mono 𝒢).1 h𝒢 A
exact Subobject.ofLEMk _ (pullback.fst : pullback s t ⟶ _) bot_le ≫ pullback.snd
· suffices ∀ (g : Subobject.underlying.obj ⊥ ⟶ A), f = g by
apply this
intro g
suffices IsSplitEpi (equalizer.ι f g) by exact eq_of_epi_equalizer
exact IsSplitEpi.mk' ⟨Subobject.ofLEMk _ (equalizer.ι f g ≫ Subobject.arrow _) bot_le, by
ext
simp⟩
#align category_theory.has_initial_of_is_coseparating CategoryTheory.hasInitial_of_isCoseparating
/-- An ingredient of the proof of the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem: a cocomplete well-copowered
category with a small separating set has a terminal object.
In fact, it follows from the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem that `C` is already complete, see
`hasLimits_of_hasColimits_of_isSeparating`. -/
theorem hasTerminal_of_isSeparating [WellPowered Cᵒᵖ] [HasColimits C] {𝒢 : Set C} [Small.{v₁} 𝒢]
(h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) : HasTerminal C := by
haveI : Small.{v₁} 𝒢.op := small_of_injective (Set.opEquiv_self 𝒢).injective
haveI : HasInitial Cᵒᵖ := hasInitial_of_isCoseparating ((isCoseparating_op_iff _).2 h𝒢)
exact hasTerminal_of_hasInitial_op
#align category_theory.has_terminal_of_is_separating CategoryTheory.hasTerminal_of_isSeparating
section WellPowered
namespace Subobject
theorem eq_of_le_of_isDetecting {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {X : C} (P Q : Subobject X)
(h₁ : P ≤ Q) (h₂ : ∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ {f : G ⟶ X}, Q.Factors f → P.Factors f) : P = Q := by
suffices IsIso (ofLE _ _ h₁) by exact le_antisymm h₁ (le_of_comm (inv (ofLE _ _ h₁)) (by simp))
refine h𝒢 _ fun G hG f => ?_
have : P.Factors (f ≫ Q.arrow) := h₂ _ hG ((factors_iff _ _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩)
refine ⟨factorThru _ _ this, ?_, fun g (hg : g ≫ _ = f) => ?_⟩
· simp only [← cancel_mono Q.arrow, Category.assoc, ofLE_arrow, factorThru_arrow]
· simp only [← cancel_mono (Subobject.ofLE _ _ h₁), ← cancel_mono Q.arrow, hg, Category.assoc,
ofLE_arrow, factorThru_arrow]
#align category_theory.subobject.eq_of_le_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.Subobject.eq_of_le_of_isDetecting
theorem inf_eq_of_isDetecting [HasPullbacks C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {X : C}
(P Q : Subobject X) (h : ∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ {f : G ⟶ X}, P.Factors f → Q.Factors f) : P ⊓ Q = P :=
eq_of_le_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ _root_.inf_le_left
fun _ hG _ hf => (inf_factors _).2 ⟨hf, h _ hG hf⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.inf_eq_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.Subobject.inf_eq_of_isDetecting
theorem eq_of_isDetecting [HasPullbacks C] {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) {X : C}
(P Q : Subobject X) (h : ∀ G ∈ 𝒢, ∀ {f : G ⟶ X}, P.Factors f ↔ Q.Factors f) : P = Q :=
calc
P = P ⊓ Q := Eq.symm <| inf_eq_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG _ hf => (h G hG).1 hf
_ = Q ⊓ P := inf_comm ..
_ = Q := inf_eq_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG _ hf => (h G hG).2 hf
#align category_theory.subobject.eq_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.Subobject.eq_of_isDetecting
end Subobject
/-- A category with pullbacks and a small detecting set is well-powered. -/
theorem wellPowered_of_isDetecting [HasPullbacks C] {𝒢 : Set C} [Small.{v₁} 𝒢]
(h𝒢 : IsDetecting 𝒢) : WellPowered C :=
⟨fun X =>
@small_of_injective _ _ _ (fun P : Subobject X => { f : ΣG : 𝒢, G.1 ⟶ X | P.Factors f.2 })
fun P Q h => Subobject.eq_of_isDetecting h𝒢 _ _ (by simpa [Set.ext_iff] using h)⟩
#align category_theory.well_powered_of_is_detecting CategoryTheory.wellPowered_of_isDetecting
end WellPowered
namespace StructuredArrow
variable (S : D) (T : C ⥤ D)
theorem isCoseparating_proj_preimage {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsCoseparating 𝒢) :
IsCoseparating ((proj S T).obj ⁻¹' 𝒢) := by
refine fun X Y f g hfg => ext _ _ (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => ?_)
exact congr_arg CommaMorphism.right (hfg (mk (Y.hom ≫ T.map h)) hG (homMk h rfl))
#align category_theory.structured_arrow.is_coseparating_proj_preimage CategoryTheory.StructuredArrow.isCoseparating_proj_preimage
end StructuredArrow
namespace CostructuredArrow
variable (S : C ⥤ D) (T : D)
theorem isSeparating_proj_preimage {𝒢 : Set C} (h𝒢 : IsSeparating 𝒢) :
IsSeparating ((proj S T).obj ⁻¹' 𝒢) := by
refine fun X Y f g hfg => ext _ _ (h𝒢 _ _ fun G hG h => ?_)
exact congr_arg CommaMorphism.left (hfg (mk (S.map h ≫ X.hom)) hG (homMk h rfl))
#align category_theory.costructured_arrow.is_separating_proj_preimage CategoryTheory.CostructuredArrow.isSeparating_proj_preimage
end CostructuredArrow
/-- We say that `G` is a separator if the functor `C(G, -)` is faithful. -/
def IsSeparator (G : C) : Prop :=
IsSeparating ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_separator CategoryTheory.IsSeparator
/-- We say that `G` is a coseparator if the functor `C(-, G)` is faithful. -/
def IsCoseparator (G : C) : Prop :=
IsCoseparating ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_coseparator CategoryTheory.IsCoseparator
/-- We say that `G` is a detector if the functor `C(G, -)` reflects isomorphisms. -/
def IsDetector (G : C) : Prop :=
IsDetecting ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_detector CategoryTheory.IsDetector
/-- We say that `G` is a codetector if the functor `C(-, G)` reflects isomorphisms. -/
def IsCodetector (G : C) : Prop :=
IsCodetecting ({G} : Set C)
#align category_theory.is_codetector CategoryTheory.IsCodetector
section Dual
theorem isSeparator_op_iff (G : C) : IsSeparator (op G) ↔ IsCoseparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isSeparating_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
#align category_theory.is_separator_op_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparator_op_iff
theorem isCoseparator_op_iff (G : C) : IsCoseparator (op G) ↔ IsSeparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isCoseparating_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
#align category_theory.is_coseparator_op_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparator_op_iff
theorem isCoseparator_unop_iff (G : Cᵒᵖ) : IsCoseparator (unop G) ↔ IsSeparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isCoseparating_unop_iff, Set.singleton_unop]
#align category_theory.is_coseparator_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isCoseparator_unop_iff
theorem isSeparator_unop_iff (G : Cᵒᵖ) : IsSeparator (unop G) ↔ IsCoseparator G := by
rw [IsSeparator, IsCoseparator, ← isSeparating_unop_iff, Set.singleton_unop]
#align category_theory.is_separator_unop_iff CategoryTheory.isSeparator_unop_iff
theorem isDetector_op_iff (G : C) : IsDetector (op G) ↔ IsCodetector G := by
rw [IsDetector, IsCodetector, ← isDetecting_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
#align category_theory.is_detector_op_iff CategoryTheory.isDetector_op_iff
theorem isCodetector_op_iff (G : C) : IsCodetector (op G) ↔ IsDetector G := by
rw [IsDetector, IsCodetector, ← isCodetecting_op_iff, Set.singleton_op]
#align category_theory.is_codetector_op_iff CategoryTheory.isCodetector_op_iff
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Generator.lean | 428 | 429 | theorem isCodetector_unop_iff (G : Cᵒᵖ) : IsCodetector (unop G) ↔ IsDetector G := by |
rw [IsDetector, IsCodetector, ← isCodetecting_unop_iff, Set.singleton_unop]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
#align_import data.set.pairwise.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4c2ed622f43768eff32608d4a0f8a6cec1c047d"
/-!
# Relations holding pairwise
This file develops pairwise relations and defines pairwise disjoint indexed sets.
We also prove many basic facts about `Pairwise`. It is possible that an intermediate file,
with more imports than `Logic.Pairwise` but not importing `Data.Set.Function` would be appropriate
to hold many of these basic facts.
## Main declarations
* `Set.PairwiseDisjoint`: `s.PairwiseDisjoint f` states that images under `f` of distinct elements
of `s` are either equal or `Disjoint`.
## Notes
The spelling `s.PairwiseDisjoint id` is preferred over `s.Pairwise Disjoint` to permit dot notation
on `Set.PairwiseDisjoint`, even though the latter unfolds to something nicer.
-/
open Function Order Set
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*} {r p q : α → α → Prop}
section Pairwise
variable {f g : ι → α} {s t u : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem pairwise_on_bool (hr : Symmetric r) {a b : α} :
Pairwise (r on fun c => cond c a b) ↔ r a b := by simpa [Pairwise, Function.onFun] using @hr a b
#align pairwise_on_bool pairwise_on_bool
theorem pairwise_disjoint_on_bool [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun c => cond c a b) ↔ Disjoint a b :=
pairwise_on_bool Disjoint.symm
#align pairwise_disjoint_on_bool pairwise_disjoint_on_bool
theorem Symmetric.pairwise_on [LinearOrder ι] (hr : Symmetric r) (f : ι → α) :
Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m < n → r (f m) (f n) :=
⟨fun h _m _n hmn => h hmn.ne, fun h _m _n hmn => hmn.lt_or_lt.elim (@h _ _) fun h' => hr (h h')⟩
#align symmetric.pairwise_on Symmetric.pairwise_on
theorem pairwise_disjoint_on [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] [LinearOrder ι] (f : ι → α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) ↔ ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m < n → Disjoint (f m) (f n) :=
Symmetric.pairwise_on Disjoint.symm f
#align pairwise_disjoint_on pairwise_disjoint_on
theorem pairwise_disjoint_mono [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] (hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on f))
(h : g ≤ f) : Pairwise (Disjoint on g) :=
hs.mono fun i j hij => Disjoint.mono (h i) (h j) hij
#align pairwise_disjoint.mono pairwise_disjoint_mono
namespace Set
theorem Pairwise.mono (h : t ⊆ s) (hs : s.Pairwise r) : t.Pairwise r :=
fun _x xt _y yt => hs (h xt) (h yt)
#align set.pairwise.mono Set.Pairwise.mono
theorem Pairwise.mono' (H : r ≤ p) (hr : s.Pairwise r) : s.Pairwise p :=
hr.imp H
#align set.pairwise.mono' Set.Pairwise.mono'
theorem pairwise_top (s : Set α) : s.Pairwise ⊤ :=
pairwise_of_forall s _ fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.pairwise_top Set.pairwise_top
protected theorem Subsingleton.pairwise (h : s.Subsingleton) (r : α → α → Prop) : s.Pairwise r :=
fun _x hx _y hy hne => (hne (h hx hy)).elim
#align set.subsingleton.pairwise Set.Subsingleton.pairwise
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_empty (r : α → α → Prop) : (∅ : Set α).Pairwise r :=
subsingleton_empty.pairwise r
#align set.pairwise_empty Set.pairwise_empty
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_singleton (a : α) (r : α → α → Prop) : Set.Pairwise {a} r :=
subsingleton_singleton.pairwise r
#align set.pairwise_singleton Set.pairwise_singleton
theorem pairwise_iff_of_refl [IsRefl α r] : s.Pairwise r ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → r a b :=
forall₄_congr fun _ _ _ _ => or_iff_not_imp_left.symm.trans <| or_iff_right_of_imp of_eq
#align set.pairwise_iff_of_refl Set.pairwise_iff_of_refl
alias ⟨Pairwise.of_refl, _⟩ := pairwise_iff_of_refl
#align set.pairwise.of_refl Set.Pairwise.of_refl
theorem Nonempty.pairwise_iff_exists_forall [IsEquiv α r] {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z := by
constructor
· rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine fun H => ⟨f y, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· apply IsRefl.refl
· exact H hx hy hne
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ x hx y hy _
exact @IsTrans.trans α r _ (f x) z (f y) (hz _ hx) (IsSymm.symm _ _ <| hz _ hy)
#align set.nonempty.pairwise_iff_exists_forall Set.Nonempty.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
/-- For a nonempty set `s`, a function `f` takes pairwise equal values on `s` if and only if
for some `z` in the codomain, `f` takes value `z` on all `x ∈ s`. See also
`Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq` for a version that assumes `[Nonempty ι]` instead of
`Set.Nonempty s`. -/
theorem Nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → ι} :
(s.Pairwise fun x y => f x = f y) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
hs.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
#align set.nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq Set.Nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq
theorem pairwise_iff_exists_forall [Nonempty ι] (s : Set α) (f : α → ι) {r : ι → ι → Prop}
[IsEquiv ι r] : s.Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· simp
· exact hne.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
#align set.pairwise_iff_exists_forall Set.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
/-- A function `f : α → ι` with nonempty codomain takes pairwise equal values on a set `s` if and
only if for some `z` in the codomain, `f` takes value `z` on all `x ∈ s`. See also
`Set.Nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq` for a version that assumes `Set.Nonempty s` instead of
`[Nonempty ι]`. -/
theorem pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq [Nonempty ι] (s : Set α) (f : α → ι) :
(s.Pairwise fun x y => f x = f y) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
pairwise_iff_exists_forall s f
#align set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq
theorem pairwise_union :
(s ∪ t).Pairwise r ↔
s.Pairwise r ∧ t.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
exact
⟨fun H => ⟨H.1.1, H.2.2, H.1.2, fun x hx y hy hne => H.2.1 y hy x hx hne.symm⟩,
fun H => ⟨⟨H.1, H.2.2.1⟩, fun x hx y hy hne => H.2.2.2 y hy x hx hne.symm, H.2.1⟩⟩
#align set.pairwise_union Set.pairwise_union
theorem pairwise_union_of_symmetric (hr : Symmetric r) :
(s ∪ t).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ t.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b → r a b :=
pairwise_union.trans <| by simp only [hr.iff, and_self_iff]
#align set.pairwise_union_of_symmetric Set.pairwise_union_of_symmetric
theorem pairwise_insert :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by
simp only [insert_eq, pairwise_union, pairwise_singleton, true_and_iff, mem_singleton_iff,
forall_eq]
#align set.pairwise_insert Set.pairwise_insert
theorem pairwise_insert_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, r a b ∧ r b a :=
pairwise_insert.trans <|
and_congr_right' <| forall₂_congr fun b hb => by simp [(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha).symm]
#align set.pairwise_insert_of_not_mem Set.pairwise_insert_of_not_mem
protected theorem Pairwise.insert (hs : s.Pairwise r) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r :=
pairwise_insert.2 ⟨hs, h⟩
#align set.pairwise.insert Set.Pairwise.insert
theorem Pairwise.insert_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Pairwise r) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b ∧ r b a) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r :=
(pairwise_insert_of_not_mem ha).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
#align set.pairwise.insert_of_not_mem Set.Pairwise.insert_of_not_mem
theorem pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (hr : Symmetric r) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b := by
simp only [pairwise_insert, hr.iff a, and_self_iff]
#align set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric
theorem pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem (hr : Symmetric r) (ha : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, r a b := by
simp only [pairwise_insert_of_not_mem ha, hr.iff a, and_self_iff]
#align set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem
theorem Pairwise.insert_of_symmetric (hs : s.Pairwise r) (hr : Symmetric r)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b) : (insert a s).Pairwise r :=
(pairwise_insert_of_symmetric hr).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
#align set.pairwise.insert_of_symmetric Set.Pairwise.insert_of_symmetric
theorem Pairwise.insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem (hs : s.Pairwise r) (hr : Symmetric r) (ha : a ∉ s)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) : (insert a s).Pairwise r :=
(pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem hr ha).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
#align set.pairwise.insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem Set.Pairwise.insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem
theorem pairwise_pair : Set.Pairwise {a, b} r ↔ a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by simp [pairwise_insert]
#align set.pairwise_pair Set.pairwise_pair
theorem pairwise_pair_of_symmetric (hr : Symmetric r) : Set.Pairwise {a, b} r ↔ a ≠ b → r a b := by
simp [pairwise_insert_of_symmetric hr]
#align set.pairwise_pair_of_symmetric Set.pairwise_pair_of_symmetric
theorem pairwise_univ : (univ : Set α).Pairwise r ↔ Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Pairwise, mem_univ, forall_const]
#align set.pairwise_univ Set.pairwise_univ
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_bot_iff : s.Pairwise (⊥ : α → α → Prop) ↔ (s : Set α).Subsingleton :=
⟨fun h _a ha _b hb => h.eq ha hb id, fun h => h.pairwise _⟩
#align set.pairwise_bot_iff Set.pairwise_bot_iff
alias ⟨Pairwise.subsingleton, _⟩ := pairwise_bot_iff
#align set.pairwise.subsingleton Set.Pairwise.subsingleton
/-- See also `Function.injective_iff_pairwise_ne` -/
lemma injOn_iff_pairwise_ne {s : Set ι} : InjOn f s ↔ s.Pairwise (f · ≠ f ·) := by
simp only [InjOn, Set.Pairwise, not_imp_not]
alias ⟨InjOn.pairwise_ne, _⟩ := injOn_iff_pairwise_ne
protected theorem Pairwise.image {s : Set ι} (h : s.Pairwise (r on f)) : (f '' s).Pairwise r :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy hne ↦ h hx hy <| ne_of_apply_ne _ hne
/-- See also `Set.Pairwise.image`. -/
theorem InjOn.pairwise_image {s : Set ι} (h : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise (r on f) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [h.eq_iff, Set.Pairwise]
#align set.inj_on.pairwise_image Set.InjOn.pairwise_image
lemma _root_.Pairwise.range_pairwise (hr : Pairwise (r on f)) : (Set.range f).Pairwise r :=
image_univ ▸ (pairwise_univ.mpr hr).image
end Set
end Pairwise
theorem pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set (s : Set α) (r : α → α → Prop) :
(Pairwise fun (x : s) (y : s) => r x y) ↔ s.Pairwise r := by
simp only [Pairwise, Set.Pairwise, SetCoe.forall, Ne, Subtype.ext_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set
alias ⟨Pairwise.set_of_subtype, Set.Pairwise.subtype⟩ := pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set
#align pairwise.set_of_subtype Pairwise.set_of_subtype
#align set.pairwise.subtype Set.Pairwise.subtype
namespace Set
section PartialOrderBot
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {s t : Set ι} {f g : ι → α}
/-- A set is `PairwiseDisjoint` under `f`, if the images of any distinct two elements under `f`
are disjoint.
`s.Pairwise Disjoint` is (definitionally) the same as `s.PairwiseDisjoint id`. We prefer the latter
in order to allow dot notation on `Set.PairwiseDisjoint`, even though the former unfolds more
nicely. -/
def PairwiseDisjoint (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : Prop :=
s.Pairwise (Disjoint on f)
#align set.pairwise_disjoint Set.PairwiseDisjoint
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.subset (ht : t.PairwiseDisjoint f) (h : s ⊆ t) : s.PairwiseDisjoint f :=
Pairwise.mono h ht
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.subset Set.PairwiseDisjoint.subset
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.mono_on (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) (h : ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → g i ≤ f i) :
s.PairwiseDisjoint g := fun _a ha _b hb hab => (hs ha hb hab).mono (h ha) (h hb)
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.mono_on Set.PairwiseDisjoint.mono_on
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.mono (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) (h : g ≤ f) : s.PairwiseDisjoint g :=
hs.mono_on fun i _ => h i
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.mono Set.PairwiseDisjoint.mono
@[simp]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_empty : (∅ : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
pairwise_empty _
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_empty Set.pairwiseDisjoint_empty
@[simp]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_singleton (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : PairwiseDisjoint {i} f :=
pairwise_singleton i _
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_singleton Set.pairwiseDisjoint_singleton
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_insert {i : ι} :
(insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f ↔
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → Disjoint (f i) (f j) :=
pairwise_insert_of_symmetric <| symmetric_disjoint.comap f
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_insert Set.pairwiseDisjoint_insert
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_insert_of_not_mem {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s) :
(insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint f ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) (f j) :=
pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem (symmetric_disjoint.comap f) hi
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_insert_of_not_mem Set.pairwiseDisjoint_insert_of_not_mem
protected theorem PairwiseDisjoint.insert (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i : ι}
(h : ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → Disjoint (f i) (f j)) : (insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
pairwiseDisjoint_insert.2 ⟨hs, h⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.insert Set.PairwiseDisjoint.insert
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.insert_of_not_mem (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s)
(h : ∀ j ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) (f j)) : (insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
(pairwiseDisjoint_insert_of_not_mem hi).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.insert_of_not_mem Set.PairwiseDisjoint.insert_of_not_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pairwise/Basic.lean | 302 | 305 | theorem PairwiseDisjoint.image_of_le (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {g : ι → ι} (hg : f ∘ g ≤ f) :
(g '' s).PairwiseDisjoint f := by |
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ h
exact (hs ha hb <| ne_of_apply_ne _ h).mono (hg a) (hg b)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
#align real.le_rpow_add Real.le_rpow_add
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
#align real.rpow_sum_of_pos Real.rpow_sum_of_pos
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
#align real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg Real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg Real.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub Real.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub' Real.rpow_sub'
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
#align complex.of_real_cpow Complex.ofReal_cpow
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, abs.map_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg,
arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx), ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align complex.of_real_cpow_of_nonpos Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(abs x ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [abs.pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = (abs x) ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = (abs x) ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem abs_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, abs_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (abs.pos hz)]
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero Complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero
theorem abs_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact abs_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [map_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, map_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_imp Complex.abs_cpow_of_imp
theorem abs_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : abs (z ^ w) ≤ abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (abs_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align complex.abs_cpow_le Complex.abs_cpow_le
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
#align complex.abs_cpow_real Complex.abs_cpow_real
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← abs_cpow_real]; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
#align complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat Complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : abs (x ^ y) = x ^ y.re := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, abs_of_nonneg hx.le]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
abs (x ^ y) = x ^ re y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, _root_.abs_of_nonneg]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero (n : ℕ) {s : ℂ} (hs : s.re ≠ 0) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg hs]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) : 0 < ‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ :=
(norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn _).symm ▸ Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _
theorem cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (z : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ (↑y * z) = (↑(x ^ y) : ℂ) ^ z := by
rw [cpow_mul, ofReal_cpow hx]
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, neg_lt_zero]; exact Real.pi_pos
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]; exact Real.pi_pos.le
#align complex.cpow_mul_of_real_nonneg Complex.cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg
end Complex
/-! ### Positivity extension -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is positive (namely 1)
when the exponent is zero. The other cases are done in `evalRpow`. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (0 : ℝ)]
def evalRpowZero : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ (0 : ℝ)) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_zero_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is nonnegative when
the base is nonnegative and positive when the base is positive. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (_ : ℝ)]
def evalRpow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ ($b : ℝ)) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_pos_of_pos $pa $b))
| .nonnegative pa =>
pure (.nonnegative q(Real.rpow_nonneg $pa $b))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-!
## Further algebraic properties of `rpow`
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
rw [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_cpow (rpow_nonneg hx _),
Complex.ofReal_cpow hx, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.cpow_mul, Complex.ofReal_cpow hx] <;>
simp only [(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, (Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, Complex.ofReal_im,
neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
#align real.rpow_mul Real.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_add_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_def, rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_add,
Complex.cpow_add _ _ (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx), Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.cpow_intCast, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, mul_comm, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.rpow_add_int Real.rpow_add_int
theorem rpow_add_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_add_nat Real.rpow_add_nat
theorem rpow_sub_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y (-n)
#align real.rpow_sub_int Real.rpow_sub_int
theorem rpow_sub_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_sub_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_sub_nat Real.rpow_sub_nat
lemma rpow_add_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_add_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_sub_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_sub_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_natCast]
theorem rpow_add_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_add_one Real.rpow_add_one
theorem rpow_sub_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_sub_one Real.rpow_sub_one
lemma rpow_add_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_sub_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [← rpow_natCast]
simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat]
#align real.rpow_two Real.rpow_two
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹ by rwa [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one] at H
simp only [rpow_intCast, zpow_one, zpow_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg_one Real.rpow_neg_one
theorem mul_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
iterate 2 rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg]; split_ifs with h_ifs <;> simp_all
· rw [log_mul ‹_› ‹_›, add_mul, exp_add, rpow_def_of_pos (hy.lt_of_ne' ‹_›)]
all_goals positivity
#align real.mul_rpow Real.mul_rpow
theorem inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm]
#align real.inv_rpow Real.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
#align real.div_rpow Real.div_rpow
theorem log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x ^ y) = y * log x := by
apply exp_injective
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y]
#align real.log_rpow Real.log_rpow
theorem mul_log_eq_log_iff {x y z : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hz : 0 < z) :
y * log x = log z ↔ x ^ y = z :=
⟨fun h ↦ log_injOn_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hz <| log_rpow hx _ |>.trans h,
by rintro rfl; rw [log_rpow hx]⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
/-! Note: lemmas about `(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r)` such as `Real.finset_prod_rpow` are proved
in `Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean` instead. -/
/-!
## Order and monotonicity
-/
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z := by
rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hx; cases' hx with hx hx
· rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)]
exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa [← hx] at hxy) _
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow Real.rpow_lt_rpow
theorem strictMonoOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
StrictMonoOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow ha hab hr
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁'); · rfl
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with (rfl | h₂'); · simp
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
#align real.rpow_le_rpow Real.rpow_le_rpow
theorem monotoneOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
MonotoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow ha hab hr
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_lt_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_pos.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans_le hxy
rw [← inv_le_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_le_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_nonneg.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), fun h => rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_iff Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h ↦ rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx h hz.le,
fun h ↦ rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hy h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy hx hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx)
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx)
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg {x y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y < x) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z < y ^ z := by
have hx : 0 < x := hy.trans hxy
rw [← neg_neg z, Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) (-z), Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy) (-z),
inv_lt_inv (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _)]
exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow (by positivity) hxy <| neg_pos_of_neg hz
theorem strictAntiOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
StrictAntiOn (fun (x:ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg ha hab hr
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with hz_zero | rfl
case inl =>
rcases ne_or_eq x y with hxy' | rfl
case inl =>
exact le_of_lt <| rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg hy (Ne.lt_of_le (id (Ne.symm hxy')) hxy)
(Ne.lt_of_le hz_zero hz)
case inr => simp
case inr => simp
theorem antitoneOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_nonpos {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) :
AntitoneOn (fun (x:ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos ha hab hr
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ y ≤ z := by
have x_pos : 0 < x := lt_trans zero_lt_one hx
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos y) (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos z), log_rpow x_pos,
log_rpow x_pos, mul_le_mul_right (log_pos hx)]
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ y < z := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hx, lt_iff_not_le]
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff Real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1)
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1)
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ z ≤ y := by
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 y) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 z), log_rpow hx0, log_rpow hx0,
mul_le_mul_right_of_neg (log_neg hx0 hx1)]
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ z < y := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one hx0 hx1, lt_iff_not_le]
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one
theorem rpow_lt_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
#align real.rpow_lt_one Real.rpow_lt_one
theorem rpow_le_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
#align real.rpow_le_one Real.rpow_le_one
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 := by
convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
#align real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
#align real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos
theorem one_lt_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
#align real.one_lt_rpow Real.one_lt_rpow
theorem one_le_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
#align real.one_le_rpow Real.one_le_rpow
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : z < 0) :
1 < x ^ z := by
convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx1 hx2 hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
#align real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
1 ≤ x ^ z := by
convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx1 hx2 hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
#align real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_lt_one_iff, mul_neg_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
#align real.rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos Real.rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos
theorem rpow_lt_one_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
x ^ y < 1 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· rcases _root_.em (y = 0) with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*, lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one]
· simp [rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos hx, hx.ne.symm]
#align real.rpow_lt_one_iff Real.rpow_lt_one_iff
theorem rpow_lt_one_iff' {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 < y) :
x ^ y < 1 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff hx zero_le_one hy, Real.one_rpow]
theorem one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, one_lt_exp_iff, mul_pos_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
#align real.one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos Real.one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos
theorem one_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ 0 < x ∧ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· rcases _root_.em (y = 0) with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*, lt_irrefl, (zero_lt_one' ℝ).not_lt]
· simp [one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos hx, hx]
#align real.one_lt_rpow_iff Real.one_lt_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge' (hx0 : 0 ≤ x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx0 with (rfl | hx0')
· rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hz with (rfl | hz')
· exact (rpow_zero 0).symm ▸ rpow_le_one hx0 hx1 hyz
rw [zero_rpow, zero_rpow] <;> linarith
· exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0' hx1 hyz
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge' Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge'
theorem rpow_left_injOn {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : InjOn (fun y : ℝ => y ^ x) { y : ℝ | 0 ≤ y } := by
rintro y hy z hz (hyz : y ^ x = z ^ x)
rw [← rpow_one y, ← rpow_one z, ← _root_.mul_inv_cancel hx, rpow_mul hy, rpow_mul hz, hyz]
#align real.rpow_left_inj_on Real.rpow_left_injOn
lemma rpow_left_inj (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injOn hz).eq_iff hx hy
lemma rpow_inv_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_left_inj _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow hx hz]; positivity
lemma eq_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_left_inj hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow hy hz]; positivity
theorem le_rpow_iff_log_le (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ y ^ z ↔ Real.log x ≤ z * Real.log y := by
rw [← Real.log_le_log_iff hx (Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hy z), Real.log_rpow hy]
#align real.le_rpow_iff_log_le Real.le_rpow_iff_log_le
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 787 | 791 | theorem le_rpow_of_log_le (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 < y) (h : Real.log x ≤ z * Real.log y) :
x ≤ y ^ z := by |
obtain hx | rfl := hx.lt_or_eq
· exact (le_rpow_iff_log_le hx hy).2 h
exact (Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hy z).le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import probability.process.stopping from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ba074af83b6cf54c3104e59402b39410ddbd6dca"
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memℒp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time_const MeasureTheory.isStoppingTime_const
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_le MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false_iff]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_lt_of_pred MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_eq_of_countable_range MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_eq_of_countable MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_of_countable
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_lt_of_countable_range MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_lt_of_countable MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_countable
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_ge_of_countable_range MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_ge_of_countable MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge_of_countable
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
#align measure_theory.is_stopping_time.measurable_set_gt MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 163 | 188 | theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by |
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false_iff]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro, Martin Dvorak
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.list.join from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
/-!
# Join of a list of lists
This file proves basic properties of `List.join`, which concatenates a list of lists. It is defined
in `Init.Data.List.Basic`.
-/
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace List
attribute [simp] join
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem join_singleton (l : List α) : [l].join = l := by rw [join, join, append_nil]
#align list.join_singleton List.join_singleton
@[simp]
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] => iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| l :: L => by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
#align list.join_eq_nil List.join_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : List (List α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ := by
induction L₁
· rfl
· simp [*]
#align list.join_append List.join_append
theorem join_concat (L : List (List α)) (l : List α) : join (L.concat l) = join L ++ l := by simp
#align list.join_concat List.join_concat
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_not_isEmpty :
∀ {L : List (List α)}, join (L.filter fun l => !l.isEmpty) = L.join
| [] => rfl
| [] :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L), isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
| (a :: l) :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L)]
#align list.join_filter_empty_eq_ff List.join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-25")] alias join_filter_isEmpty_eq_false := join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_ne_nil [DecidablePred fun l : List α => l ≠ []] {L : List (List α)} :
join (L.filter fun l => l ≠ []) = L.join := by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty, ← isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
#align list.join_filter_ne_nil List.join_filter_ne_nil
theorem join_join (l : List (List (List α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.join_join List.join_join
/-- See `List.length_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma length_join' (L : List (List α)) : length (join L) = Nat.sum (map length L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, Nat.sum_cons, length_append]]
/-- See `List.countP_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma countP_join' (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L : List (List α), countP p L.join = Nat.sum (L.map (countP p))
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [join, countP_append, map_cons, Nat.sum_cons, countP_join' _ l]
/-- See `List.count_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma count_join' [BEq α] (L : List (List α)) (a : α) :
L.join.count a = Nat.sum (L.map (count a)) := countP_join' _ _
/-- See `List.length_bind` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma length_bind' (l : List α) (f : α → List β) :
length (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (length ∘ f) l) := by rw [List.bind, length_join', map_map]
/-- See `List.countP_bind` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma countP_bind' (p : β → Bool) (l : List α) (f : α → List β) :
countP p (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (countP p ∘ f) l) := by rw [List.bind, countP_join', map_map]
/-- See `List.count_bind` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma count_bind' [BEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → List β) (x : β) :
count x (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (count x ∘ f) l) := countP_bind' _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_nil {l : List α} {f : α → List β} : List.bind l f = [] ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = [] :=
join_eq_nil.trans <| by
simp only [mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
#align list.bind_eq_nil List.bind_eq_nil
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists.
See `List.take_sum_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
theorem take_sum_join' (L : List (List α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) = (L.take i).join := by
induction L generalizing i
· simp
· cases i <;> simp [take_append, *]
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists.
See `List.drop_sum_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
theorem drop_sum_join' (L : List (List α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) = (L.drop i).join := by
induction L generalizing i
· simp
· cases i <;> simp [drop_append, *]
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
theorem drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get (L : List α) (i : Fin L.length) :
(L.take (i + 1)).drop i = [get L i] := by
induction' L with head tail ih
· exact (Nat.not_succ_le_zero i i.isLt).elim
rcases i with ⟨_ | i, hi⟩
· simp
· simpa using ih ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
@[deprecated drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get (since := "2023-01-10")]
theorem drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nthLe (L : List α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i + 1)).drop i = [nthLe L i hi] := by
induction' L with head tail generalizing i
· simp only [length] at hi
exact (Nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim
cases' i with i hi
· simp
rfl
have : i < tail.length := by simpa using hi
simp [*]
rfl
#align list.drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le List.drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nthLe
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`.
See `List.drop_take_succ_join_eq_get` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
theorem drop_take_succ_join_eq_get' (L : List (List α)) (i : Fin L.length) :
(L.join.take (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take (i + 1)))).drop (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) =
get L i := by
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i + 1)).map length).take i := by
simp [map_take, take_take, Nat.min_eq_left]
simp only [this, length_map, take_sum_join', drop_sum_join', drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get,
join, append_nil]
#noalign list.drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le
#noalign list.sum_take_map_length_lt1
#noalign list.sum_take_map_length_lt2
#noalign list.nth_le_join
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : List (List α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' := by
refine ⟨fun H => by simp [H], ?_⟩
rintro ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩
apply ext_get
· have : length (map length L) = length (map length L') := by rw [length_eq]
simpa using this
· intro n h₁ h₂
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_get', ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_get', join_eq, length_eq]
#align list.eq_iff_join_eq List.eq_iff_join_eq
theorem join_drop_length_sub_one {L : List (List α)} (h : L ≠ []) :
(L.drop (L.length - 1)).join = L.getLast h := by
induction L using List.reverseRecOn
· cases h rfl
· simp
#align list.join_drop_length_sub_one List.join_drop_length_sub_one
/-- We can rebracket `x ++ (l₁ ++ x) ++ (l₂ ++ x) ++ ... ++ (lₙ ++ x)` to
`(x ++ l₁) ++ (x ++ l₂) ++ ... ++ (x ++ lₙ) ++ x` where `L = [l₁, l₂, ..., lₙ]`. -/
theorem append_join_map_append (L : List (List α)) (x : List α) :
x ++ (L.map (· ++ x)).join = (L.map (x ++ ·)).join ++ x := by
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rw [map_nil, join, append_nil, map_nil, join, nil_append]
· rw [map_cons, join, map_cons, join, append_assoc, ih, append_assoc, append_assoc]
#align list.append_join_map_append List.append_join_map_append
/-- Reversing a join is the same as reversing the order of parts and reversing all parts. -/
theorem reverse_join (L : List (List α)) :
L.join.reverse = (L.map reverse).reverse.join := by
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rfl
· rw [join, reverse_append, ih, map_cons, reverse_cons', join_concat]
#align list.reverse_join List.reverse_join
/-- Joining a reverse is the same as reversing all parts and reversing the joined result. -/
| Mathlib/Data/List/Join.lean | 204 | 206 | theorem join_reverse (L : List (List α)) :
L.reverse.join = (L.map reverse).join.reverse := by |
simpa [reverse_reverse, map_reverse] using congr_arg List.reverse (reverse_join L.reverse)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Approximations
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.CorrectnessTerminating
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Floor
#align_import algebra.continued_fractions.computation.terminates_iff_rat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Termination of Continued Fraction Computations (`GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of`)
## Summary
We show that the continued fraction for a value `v`, as defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Basic`, terminates if and only if `v` corresponds to a
rational number, that is `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Main Theorems
- `GeneralizedContinuedFraction.coe_of_rat_eq` shows that
`GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of v = GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of q` for `v : α` given that
`↑v = q` and `q : ℚ`.
- `GeneralizedContinuedFraction.terminates_iff_rat` shows that
`GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of v` terminates if and only if `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Tags
rational, continued fraction, termination
-/
namespace GeneralizedContinuedFraction
open GeneralizedContinuedFraction (of)
variable {K : Type*} [LinearOrderedField K] [FloorRing K]
/-
We will have to constantly coerce along our structures in the following proofs using their provided
map functions.
-/
attribute [local simp] Pair.map IntFractPair.mapFr
section RatOfTerminates
/-!
### Terminating Continued Fractions Are Rational
We want to show that the computation of a continued fraction `GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of v`
terminates if and only if `v ∈ ℚ`. In this section, we show the implication from left to right.
We first show that every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number `q` and then use the
finite correctness proof (`of_correctness_of_terminates`) of `GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of` to
show that `v = ↑q`.
-/
variable (v : K) (n : ℕ)
nonrec theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_conts_aux :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).continuantsAux n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) :=
Nat.strong_induction_on n
(by
clear n
let g := of v
intro n IH
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
-- n = 0
· suffices ∃ gp : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk (1 : K) 0 = gp.map (↑) by simpa [continuantsAux]
use Pair.mk 1 0
simp
-- n = 1
· suffices ∃ conts : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk g.h 1 = conts.map (↑) by simpa [continuantsAux]
use Pair.mk ⌊v⌋ 1
simp [g]
-- 2 ≤ n
· cases' IH (n + 1) <| lt_add_one (n + 1) with pred_conts pred_conts_eq
-- invoke the IH
cases' s_ppred_nth_eq : g.s.get? n with gp_n
-- option.none
· use pred_conts
have : g.continuantsAux (n + 2) = g.continuantsAux (n + 1) :=
continuantsAux_stable_of_terminated (n + 1).le_succ s_ppred_nth_eq
simp only [this, pred_conts_eq]
-- option.some
· -- invoke the IH a second time
cases' IH n <| lt_of_le_of_lt n.le_succ <| lt_add_one <| n + 1 with ppred_conts
ppred_conts_eq
obtain ⟨a_eq_one, z, b_eq_z⟩ : gp_n.a = 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, gp_n.b = (z : K) :=
of_part_num_eq_one_and_exists_int_part_denom_eq s_ppred_nth_eq
-- finally, unfold the recurrence to obtain the required rational value.
simp only [a_eq_one, b_eq_z,
continuantsAux_recurrence s_ppred_nth_eq ppred_conts_eq pred_conts_eq]
use nextContinuants 1 (z : ℚ) ppred_conts pred_conts
cases ppred_conts; cases pred_conts
simp [nextContinuants, nextNumerator, nextDenominator])
#align generalized_continued_fraction.exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_conts_aux GeneralizedContinuedFraction.exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_conts_aux
theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).continuants n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) := by
rw [nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_cont_aux]; exact exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_conts_aux v <| n + 1
#align generalized_continued_fraction.exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts GeneralizedContinuedFraction.exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_numerator : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).numerators n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨a, _⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use a
simp [num_eq_conts_a, nth_cont_eq]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.exists_rat_eq_nth_numerator GeneralizedContinuedFraction.exists_rat_eq_nth_numerator
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_denominator : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).denominators n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨_, b⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use b
simp [denom_eq_conts_b, nth_cont_eq]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.exists_rat_eq_nth_denominator GeneralizedContinuedFraction.exists_rat_eq_nth_denominator
/-- Every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/Computation/TerminatesIffRat.lean | 119 | 123 | theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_convergent : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).convergents n = (q : K) := by |
rcases exists_rat_eq_nth_numerator v n with ⟨Aₙ, nth_num_eq⟩
rcases exists_rat_eq_nth_denominator v n with ⟨Bₙ, nth_denom_eq⟩
use Aₙ / Bₙ
simp [nth_num_eq, nth_denom_eq, convergent_eq_num_div_denom]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deligne
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.RemovableSingularity
/-!
# Even Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the meromorphic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaEven a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, 1 / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`cosZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / |n| ^ s`.
Note that the term for `n = -a` in the first sum is omitted if `a` is an integer, and the term for
`n = 0` is omitted in the second sum (always).
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
meromorphic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
We also define completed versions of these functions with nicer functional equations (satisfying
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a s = Gammaℝ s * hurwitzZetaEven a s`, and similarly for `cosZeta`); and
modified versions with a subscript `0`, which are entire functions differing from the above by
multiples of `1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `hurwitzZetaEven` and `cosZeta`: the zeta functions
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven` and `completedCosZeta`: completed variants
* `differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven` and `differentiableAt_cosZeta`:
differentiability away from `s = 1`
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaEven` and `hasSum_nat_cosZeta`: relation between the zeta functions and
the corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set Classical MeasureTheory
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Even Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the even part of the
completed Hurwit zeta function). See `evenKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_evenKernel` for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`. -/
@[irreducible] def evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic
(fun ξ : ℝ ↦ rexp (-π * ξ ^ 2 * x) * re (jacobiTheta₂ (ξ * I * x) (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ
simp only [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, add_mul, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
have : cexp (-↑π * I * ((I * ↑x) + 2 * (↑ξ * I * ↑x))) = rexp (π * (x + 2 * ξ * x)) := by
ring_nf
simp only [I_sq, mul_neg, mul_one, neg_mul, neg_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, ofReal_exp, ofReal_add,
ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat]
rw [this, re_ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.exp_add]
congr
ring).lift a
lemma evenKernel_def (a x : ℝ) :
↑(evenKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x) := by
unfold evenKernel
simp only [neg_mul, Function.Periodic.lift_coe, ofReal_mul, ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, ofReal_pow,
re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, map_mul, conj_ofReal, conj_I, mul_neg, neg_neg,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, ← mul_two, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
/-- For `x ≤ 0` the defining sum diverges, so the kernel is 0. -/
lemma evenKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : evenKernel a x = 0 := by
have : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0 := by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re]
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
rw [← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ this, mul_zero, ofReal_zero]
/-- Cosine Hurwitz zeta kernel. See `cosKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_cosKernel` for expression as a sum. -/
@[irreducible] def cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂ ξ (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp_rw [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, jacobiTheta₂_add_left]).lift a
lemma cosKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(cosKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂ a (I * x) := by
unfold cosKernel
simp only [Function.Periodic.lift_coe, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, conj_ofReal, map_mul,
conj_I, neg_mul, neg_neg, ← mul_two, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
lemma cosKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : cosKernel a x = 0 := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
rw [← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re]), ofReal_zero]
/-- For `a = 0`, both kernels agree. -/
lemma evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero : evenKernel 0 = cosKernel 0 := by
ext1 x
simp only [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, ofReal_zero, sq, mul_zero,
zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, one_mul, cosKernel_def]
lemma evenKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : evenKernel (-a) x = evenKernel a x := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
simp only [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, ofReal_neg, neg_sq, neg_mul,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left]
lemma cosKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : cosKernel (-a) x = cosKernel a x := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
simp only [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def, ofReal_neg,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left]
lemma continuousOn_evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (evenKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (evenKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [evenKernel_def a']
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn (fun x hx ↦ ((Continuous.continuousAt ?_).mul ?_))
· exact Complex.continuous_exp.comp (continuous_const.mul continuous_ofReal)
· have h := continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a' * I * x) (?_ : 0 < im (I * x))
· exact h.comp (f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a' * I * u, I * u)) (by fun_prop)
· rwa [mul_im, I_re, I_im, zero_mul, one_mul, zero_add, ofReal_re]
lemma continuousOn_cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (cosKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (cosKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [cosKernel_def]
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
have : 0 < im (I * x) := by rwa [mul_im, I_re, I_im, zero_mul, one_mul, zero_add, ofReal_re]
exact (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ a' this).comp (f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (_, I * u)) (by fun_prop)
lemma evenKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
evenKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) * cosKernel a (1 / x) := by
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [evenKernel_undef _ hx, cosKernel_undef, mul_zero]
exact div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos zero_le_one hx
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_functional_equation]
have h1 : I * ↑(1 / x) = -1 / (I * x) := by
push_cast
rw [← div_div, mul_one_div, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg]
have hx' : I * x ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero I_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne')
have h2 : a * I * x / (I * x) = a := by
rw [div_eq_iff hx']
ring
have h3 : 1 / (-I * (I * x)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) = 1 / ↑(x ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)) := by
rw [neg_mul, ← mul_assoc, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg,ofReal_cpow hx.le, ofReal_div,
ofReal_one, ofReal_ofNat]
have h4 : -π * I * (a * I * x) ^ 2 / (I * x) = - (-π * a ^ 2 * x) := by
rw [mul_pow, mul_pow, I_sq, div_eq_iff hx']
ring
rw [h1, h2, h3, h4, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm (cexp _), mul_assoc _ (cexp _) (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add, neg_add_self, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
end kernel_defs
section asymp
/-!
## Formulae for the kernels as sums
-/
lemma hasSum_int_evenKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t)) (evenKernel a t) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, evenKernel_def]
have (n : ℤ) : ↑(rexp (-π * (↑n + a) ^ 2 * t)) =
cexp (-↑π * ↑a ^ 2 * ↑t) * jacobiTheta₂_term n (↑a * I * ↑t) (I * ↑t) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
push_cast
congr
ring_nf
simp only [I_sq, mul_neg, neg_mul, mul_one]
simp only [this]
apply (hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term _ (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).mul_left
lemma hasSum_int_cosKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) ↑(cosKernel a t) := by
rw [cosKernel_def a t]
have (n : ℤ) : cexp (2 * ↑π * I * ↑a * ↑n) * ↑(rexp (-π * ↑n ^ 2 * t)) =
jacobiTheta₂_term n (↑a) (I * ↑t) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, ofReal_exp, ← Complex.exp_add]
push_cast
ring_nf
simp only [I_sq, mul_neg, neg_mul, mul_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
simp only [this]
exact hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term _ (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
/-- Modified version of `hasSum_int_evenKernel` omitting the constant term at `∞`. -/
lemma hasSum_int_evenKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n + a = 0 then 0 else rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t))
(evenKernel a t - if (a : UnitAddCircle) = 0 then 1 else 0) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable -- speed up instance search for `if / then / else`
simp_rw [AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff, zsmul_one]
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := h
simp_rw [← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_eq_zero, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
simpa only [Int.cast_add, neg_mul, Int.cast_neg, add_left_neg, ne_eq, OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero,
not_false_eq_true, zero_pow, mul_zero, zero_mul, Real.exp_zero]
using hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum (hasSum_int_evenKernel (k : ℝ) ht) (-k)
· suffices ∀ (n : ℤ), n + a ≠ 0 by simpa [this] using hasSum_int_evenKernel a ht
contrapose! h
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨-n, by rwa [Int.cast_neg, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero]⟩
lemma hasSum_int_cosKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n = 0 then 0 else cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
(↑(cosKernel a t) - 1) := by
simpa? using hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum (hasSum_int_cosKernel a ht) 0
says simpa only [neg_mul, ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_intCast,
Int.cast_zero, mul_zero, Complex.exp_zero, ne_eq, OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true,
zero_pow, zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, ofReal_one, mul_one] using
hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum (hasSum_int_cosKernel a ht) 0
lemma hasSum_nat_cosKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ 2 * Real.cos (2 * π * a * (n + 1)) * rexp (-π * (n + 1) ^ 2 * t))
(cosKernel a t - 1) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, ofReal_sub, ofReal_one]
have := (hasSum_int_cosKernel a ht).nat_add_neg
rw [← hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1] at this
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_one, Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Int.cast_zero, zero_pow two_ne_zero,
mul_zero, zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, Real.exp_zero, ofReal_one, mul_one, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_natCast, neg_sq, ← add_mul, add_sub_assoc, ← sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub,
← sub_eq_add_neg, mul_neg] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.cos, mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero]
congr 3 <;> ring
/-!
## Asymptotics of the kernels as `t → ∞`
-/
/-- The function `evenKernel a - L` has exponential decay at `+∞`, where `L = 1` if
`a = 0` and `L = 0` otherwise. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_evenKernel_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) : ∃ p : ℝ, 0 < p ∧
(evenKernel a · - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0)) =O[atTop] (rexp <| -p * ·) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with b
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_int_zero_sub b
refine ⟨p, hp, (EventuallyEq.isBigO ?_).trans hp'⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
simp only [← (hasSum_int_evenKernel b ht).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_int,
HurwitzKernelBounds.f_int, pow_zero, one_mul, Function.Periodic.lift_coe]
/-- The function `cosKernel a - 1` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_cosKernel_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (cosKernel a · - 1) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with a
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_nat_zero_sub zero_le_one
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans (hp'.const_mul_left 2)⟩
simp only [eq_false_intro one_ne_zero, if_false, sub_zero]
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [← (hasSum_nat_cosKernel₀ a ht).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_nat]
apply tsum_of_norm_bounded ((HurwitzKernelBounds.summable_f_nat 0 1 ht).hasSum.mul_left 2)
intro n
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_two, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left two_pos,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat, pow_zero, one_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_left (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
end asymp
section FEPair
/-!
## Construction of a FE-pair
-/
/-- A `WeakFEPair` structure with `f = evenKernel a` and `g = cosKernel a`. -/
def hurwitzEvenFEPair (a : UnitAddCircle) : WeakFEPair ℂ where
f := ofReal' ∘ evenKernel a
g := ofReal' ∘ cosKernel a
hf_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_evenKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hg_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_cosKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hk := one_half_pos
hε := one_ne_zero
f₀ := if a = 0 then 1 else 0
hf_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_evenKernel_sub a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
conv at hv' =>
enter [2, x]; rw [← norm_real, ofReal_sub, apply_ite ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ), ofReal_one, ofReal_zero]
exact hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
g₀ := 1
hg_top r := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_cosKernel_sub a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hp' ⊢
have (x : ℝ) : ‖(ofReal' ∘ cosKernel a) x - 1‖ = ‖cosKernel a x - 1‖ := by
rw [← norm_real, ofReal_sub, ofReal_one, Function.comp_apply]
simp only [this]
exact hp'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hp _).isBigO
h_feq x hx := by
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, one_mul, smul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_mul,
evenKernel_functional_equation, one_div x, one_div x⁻¹, inv_rpow (le_of_lt hx),
one_div, inv_inv]
lemma hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm :
(hurwitzEvenFEPair 0).symm = hurwitzEvenFEPair 0 := by
unfold hurwitzEvenFEPair WeakFEPair.symm
congr 1 <;> simp only [evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero, inv_one, if_true]
lemma hurwitzEvenFEPair_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) : hurwitzEvenFEPair (-a) = hurwitzEvenFEPair a := by
unfold hurwitzEvenFEPair
congr 1 <;> simp only [Function.comp_def, evenKernel_neg, cosKernel_neg, neg_eq_zero]
/-!
## Definition of the completed even Hurwitz zeta function
-/
/--
The meromorphic function of `s` which agrees with
`1 / 2 * Gamma (s / 2) * π ^ (-s / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), 1 / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedHurwitzZetaEven (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ (s / 2)) / 2
/-- The entire function differing from `completedHurwitzZetaEven a s` by a linear combination of
`1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`. -/
def completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ₀ (s / 2)) / 2
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven a s =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, WeakFEPair.Λ, sub_div, sub_div]
congr 1
· change completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (1 / (s / 2)) • (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / 2 =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / s
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, mul_one_div]
· change (1 / (↑(1 / 2 : ℝ) - s / 2)) • 1 / 2 = 1 / (1 - s)
push_cast
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_one, ← sub_div, div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero]
/--
The meromorphic function of `s` which agrees with
`Gamma (s / 2) * π ^ (-s / 2) * ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s` for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedCosZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ (s / 2)) / 2
/-- The entire function differing from `completedCosZeta a s` by a linear combination of
`1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`. -/
def completedCosZeta₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ₀ (s / 2)) / 2
lemma completedCosZeta_eq (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta a s =
completedCosZeta₀ a s - 1 / s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / (1 - s) := by
rw [completedCosZeta, WeakFEPair.Λ, sub_div, sub_div]
congr 1
· rw [completedCosZeta₀, WeakFEPair.symm, hurwitzEvenFEPair, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, div_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
· simp_rw [WeakFEPair.symm, hurwitzEvenFEPair, push_cast, inv_one, smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm _ (if _ then _ else _), mul_div_assoc, div_div, ← sub_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_one_div]
/-!
## Parity and functional equations
-/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven (-a) s = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s := by
simp only [completedHurwitzZetaEven, hurwitzEvenFEPair_neg]
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (-a) s = completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s := by
simp only [completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, hurwitzEvenFEPair_neg]
lemma completedCosZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta (-a) s = completedCosZeta a s := by
simp only [completedCosZeta, hurwitzEvenFEPair_neg]
lemma completedCosZeta₀_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ (-a) s = completedCosZeta₀ a s := by
simp only [completedCosZeta₀, hurwitzEvenFEPair_neg]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, sub_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 : ℂ) = ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)),
(by rfl : (1 / 2 : ℝ) = (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).k),
(hurwitzEvenFEPair a).functional_equation (s / 2),
(by rfl : (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).ε = 1),
one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function with poles removed. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta₀ a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀, sub_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 : ℂ) = ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)),
(by rfl : (1 / 2 : ℝ) = (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).k),
(hurwitzEvenFEPair a).functional_equation₀ (s / 2),
(by rfl : (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).ε = 1),
one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function (alternative form). -/
lemma completedCosZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function with poles removed (alternative form). -/
lemma completedCosZeta₀_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
end FEPair
/-!
## Differentiability and residues
-/
section FEPair
/--
The even Hurwitz completed zeta is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1` (and also at
`s = 0` if `a ≠ 0`)
-/
lemma differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven
(a : UnitAddCircle) {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaEven a) s := by
refine (((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).differentiableAt_Λ ?_ (Or.inl ?_)).comp s
(differentiableAt_id.div_const _)).div_const _
· simp only [ne_eq, div_eq_zero_iff, OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, or_false]
rcases hs with h | h
· exact Or.inl h
· simp only [hurwitzEvenFEPair, one_div, h, ↓reduceIte, or_true]
· change s / 2 ≠ ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)
rw [ofReal_div, ofReal_one, ofReal_ofNat]
exact hs' ∘ (div_left_inj' two_ne_zero).mp
lemma differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a) :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).differentiable_Λ₀.comp (differentiable_id.div_const _)).div_const _
/-- The difference of two completed even Hurwitz zeta functions is differentiable at `s = 1`. -/
lemma differentiableAt_one_completedHurwitzZetaEven_sub_completedHurwitzZetaEven
(a b : UnitAddCircle) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s ↦ completedHurwitzZetaEven a s - completedHurwitzZetaEven b s) 1 := by
have (s) : completedHurwitzZetaEven a s - completedHurwitzZetaEven b s =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ b s -
((if a = 0 then 1 else 0) - (if b = 0 then 1 else 0)) / s := by
simp_rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, sub_div]
abel
rw [funext this]
refine .sub ?_ <| (differentiable_const _ _).div (differentiable_id _) one_ne_zero
apply DifferentiableAt.sub <;> apply differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀
lemma differentiableAt_completedCosZeta
(a : UnitAddCircle) {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1 ∨ a ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (completedCosZeta a) s := by
refine (((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.differentiableAt_Λ (Or.inl ?_) ?_).comp s
(differentiableAt_id.div_const _)).div_const _
· exact div_ne_zero_iff.mpr ⟨hs, two_ne_zero⟩
· change s / 2 ≠ ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ) ∨ (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) = 0
refine Or.imp (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun ha ↦ ?_) hs'
· simpa only [push_cast] using h ∘ (div_left_inj' two_ne_zero).mp
· simp_rw [eq_false_intro ha, if_false]
lemma differentiable_completedCosZeta₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedCosZeta₀ a) :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.differentiable_Λ₀.comp (differentiable_id.div_const _)).div_const _
private lemma tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds (a : ℂ) :
Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ s / 2) (𝓝[≠] a) (𝓝[≠] (a / 2)) :=
le_of_eq ((Homeomorph.mulRight₀ _ (inv_ne_zero (two_ne_zero' ℂ))).map_punctured_nhds_eq a)
/-- The residue of `completedHurwitzZetaEven a s` at `s = 1` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedHurwitzZetaEven a s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) := by
have h1 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ (s - ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)) * _) (𝓝[≠] ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ))
(𝓝 ((1 : ℂ) * (1 : ℂ))) := (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ_residue_k
simp only [push_cast, one_mul] at h1
refine (h1.comp <| tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds 1).congr (fun s ↦ ?_)
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, Function.comp_apply, ← sub_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
/-- The residue of `completedHurwitzZetaEven a s` at `s = 0` is equal to `-1` if `a = 0`, and `0`
otherwise. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_zero (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ s * completedHurwitzZetaEven a s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 (if a = 0 then -1 else 0)) := by
have h1 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ s * _) (𝓝[≠] 0)
(𝓝 (-(if a = 0 then 1 else 0))) := (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ_residue_zero
have : -(if a = 0 then (1 : ℂ) else 0) = (if a = 0 then -1 else 0) := by { split_ifs <;> simp }
simp only [this, push_cast, one_mul] at h1
refine (h1.comp <| zero_div (2 : ℂ) ▸ (tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds 0)).congr (fun s ↦ ?_)
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, Function.comp_apply, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
lemma completedCosZeta_residue_zero (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ s * completedCosZeta a s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
have h1 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ s * _) (𝓝[≠] 0)
(𝓝 (-1)) := (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ_residue_zero
refine (h1.comp <| zero_div (2 : ℂ) ▸ (tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds 0)).congr (fun s ↦ ?_)
rw [completedCosZeta, Function.comp_apply, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
end FEPair
/-!
## Relation to the Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
/-- Formula for `completedCosZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(first version, with sum over `ℤ`). -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedCosZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ s * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / (↑|n| : ℂ) ^ s / 2)
(completedCosZeta a s) := by
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / 2
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n = 0 then 0 else c n * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
((cosKernel a t - 1) / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_cosKernel₀ a ht).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_div, c, div_mul_eq_mul_div]
simp only [← Int.cast_eq_zero (α := ℝ)] at hF
rw [show completedCosZeta a s = mellin (fun t ↦ (cosKernel a t - 1 : ℂ) / 2) (s / 2) by
rw [mellin_div_const, completedCosZeta]
congr 1
refine ((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.hasMellin (?_ : 1 / 2 < (s / 2).re)).2.symm
rwa [div_ofNat_re, div_lt_div_right two_pos]]
refine (hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF ?_).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
· apply (((summable_one_div_int_add_rpow 0 s.re).mpr hs).div_const 2).of_norm_bounded
intro i
simp only [c, (by { push_cast; ring } : 2 * π * I * a * i = ↑(2 * π * a * i) * I), norm_div,
RCLike.norm_ofNat, norm_norm, Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I, add_zero, norm_one,
norm_of_nonneg (by positivity : 0 ≤ |(i : ℝ)| ^ s.re), div_right_comm, le_rfl]
· simp only [c, Int.cast_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_abs, ofReal_intCast, div_right_comm, mul_div_assoc]
/-- Formula for `completedCosZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(second version, with sum over `ℕ`). -/
lemma hasSum_nat_completedCosZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ if n = 0 then 0 else Gammaℝ s * Real.cos (2 * π * a * n) / (n : ℂ) ^ s)
(completedCosZeta a s) := by
have aux : ((|0| : ℤ) : ℂ) ^ s = 0 := by
rw [abs_zero, Int.cast_zero, zero_cpow (ne_zero_of_one_lt_re hs)]
have hint := (hasSum_int_completedCosZeta a hs).nat_add_neg
rw [aux, div_zero, zero_div, add_zero] at hint
refine hint.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, Nat.cast_zero, aux, div_zero, zero_div, neg_zero, zero_add]
· simp only [ofReal_cos, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_natCast, Complex.cos,
show 2 * π * a * n * I = 2 * π * I * a * n by ring, neg_mul, mul_div_assoc,
div_right_comm _ (2 : ℂ), Int.cast_natCast, Nat.abs_cast, Int.cast_neg, mul_neg, abs_neg, ←
mul_add, ← add_div]
/-- Formula for `completedHurwitzZetaEven` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range. -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaEven (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ s / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (completedHurwitzZetaEven a s) := by
have hF (t : ℝ) (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n + a = 0 then 0
else (1 / 2 : ℂ) * rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t))
((evenKernel a t - (if (a : UnitAddCircle) = 0 then 1 else 0 : ℝ)) / 2) := by
refine (ofReal_sub .. ▸ (hasSum_ofReal.mpr (hasSum_int_evenKernel₀ a ht)).div_const
2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
split_ifs
· rw [ofReal_zero, zero_div]
· rw [mul_comm, mul_one_div]
rw [show completedHurwitzZetaEven a s = mellin (fun t ↦ ((evenKernel (↑a) t : ℂ) -
↑(if (a : UnitAddCircle) = 0 then 1 else 0 : ℝ)) / 2) (s / 2) by
simp_rw [mellin_div_const, apply_ite ofReal', ofReal_one, ofReal_zero]
refine congr_arg (· / 2) ((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).hasMellin (?_ : 1 / 2 < (s / 2).re)).2.symm
rwa [div_ofNat_re, div_lt_div_right two_pos]]
refine (hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF ?_).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
· simp_rw [← mul_one_div ‖_‖]
apply Summable.mul_left
rwa [summable_one_div_int_add_rpow]
· rw [mul_one_div, div_right_comm]
/-!
## The un-completed even Hurwitz zeta
-/
/-- Technical lemma which will give us differentiability of Hurwitz zeta at `s = 0`. -/
lemma differentiableAt_update_of_residue
{Λ : ℂ → ℂ} (hf : ∀ (s : ℂ) (_ : s ≠ 0) (_ : s ≠ 1), DifferentiableAt ℂ Λ s)
{L : ℂ} (h_lim : Tendsto (fun s ↦ s * Λ s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 L)) (s : ℂ) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (Function.update (fun s ↦ Λ s / Gammaℝ s) 0 (L / 2)) s := by
have claim (t) (ht : t ≠ 0) (ht' : t ≠ 1) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun u : ℂ ↦ Λ u / Gammaℝ u) t :=
(hf t ht ht').mul differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.differentiableAt
have claim2 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ Λ s / Gammaℝ s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 <| L / 2) := by
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ (h_lim.div Gammaℝ_residue_zero two_ne_zero)
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with s (hs : s ≠ 0)
rw [Pi.div_apply, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hs]
rcases ne_or_eq s 0 with hs | rfl
· -- Easy case : `s ≠ 0`
refine (claim s hs hs').congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
filter_upwards [isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hs] with x hx
simp only [Function.update_noteq hx]
· -- Hard case : `s = 0`
simp_rw [← claim2.limUnder_eq]
have S_nhds : {(1 : ℂ)}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 (0 : ℂ) := isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hs'
refine ((Complex.differentiableOn_update_limUnder_of_isLittleO S_nhds
(fun t ht ↦ (claim t ht.2 ht.1).differentiableWithinAt) ?_) 0 hs').differentiableAt S_nhds
simp only [Gammaℝ, zero_div, div_zero, Complex.Gamma_zero, mul_zero, cpow_zero, sub_zero]
-- Remains to show completed zeta is `o (s ^ (-1))` near 0.
refine (isBigO_const_of_tendsto claim2 <| one_ne_zero' ℂ).trans_isLittleO ?_
rw [isLittleO_iff_tendsto']
· exact Tendsto.congr (fun x ↦ by rw [← one_div, one_div_one_div]) nhdsWithin_le_nhds
· exact eventually_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin fun x hx hx' ↦ (hx <| inv_eq_zero.mp hx').elim
/-- The even part of the Hurwitz zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `1 / 2 * ∑' (n : ℤ), 1 / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s`-/
noncomputable def hurwitzZetaEven (a : UnitAddCircle) :=
Function.update (fun s ↦ completedHurwitzZetaEven a s / Gammaℝ s)
0 (if a = 0 then -1 / 2 else 0)
lemma hurwitzZetaEven_def_of_ne_or_ne {a : UnitAddCircle} {s : ℂ} (h : a ≠ 0 ∨ s ≠ 0) :
hurwitzZetaEven a s = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s / Gammaℝ s := by
rw [hurwitzZetaEven]
rcases ne_or_eq s 0 with h | rfl
· rw [Function.update_noteq h]
· simpa only [Gammaℝ, Function.update_same, neg_zero, zero_div, cpow_zero, Complex.Gamma_zero,
mul_zero, div_zero, ite_eq_right_iff, div_eq_zero_iff, neg_eq_zero, one_ne_zero,
OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, or_self, imp_false, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_false] using h
lemma hurwitzZetaEven_apply_zero (a : UnitAddCircle) :
hurwitzZetaEven a 0 = if a = 0 then -1 / 2 else 0 :=
Function.update_same _ _ _
lemma hurwitzZetaEven_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
hurwitzZetaEven (-a) s = hurwitzZetaEven a s := by
simp_rw [hurwitzZetaEven, neg_eq_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven_neg]
/-- The trivial zeroes of the even Hurwitz zeta function. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaEven.lean | 623 | 628 | theorem hurwitzZetaEven_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one (a : UnitAddCircle) (n : ℕ) :
hurwitzZetaEven a (-2 * (n + 1)) = 0 := by |
have : (-2 : ℂ) * (n + 1) ≠ 0 :=
mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr two_ne_zero) (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero n)
rw [hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_noteq this,
Gammaℝ_eq_zero_iff.mpr ⟨n + 1, by rw [neg_mul, Nat.cast_add_one]⟩, div_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
#align_import number_theory.von_mangoldt from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c946d6097a6925ad16d7ec55677bbc977f9846de"
/-!
# The von Mangoldt Function
In this file we define the von Mangoldt function: the function on natural numbers that returns
`log p` if the input can be expressed as `p^k` for a prime `p`.
## Main Results
The main definition for this file is
- `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt`: The von Mangoldt function `Λ`.
We then prove the classical summation property of the von Mangoldt function in
`ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_sum`, that `∑ i ∈ n.divisors, Λ i = Real.log n`, and use this
to deduce alternative expressions for the von Mangoldt function via Möbius inversion, see
`ArithmeticFunction.sum_moebius_mul_log_eq`.
## Notation
We use the standard notation `Λ` to represent the von Mangoldt function.
It is accessible in the locales `ArithmeticFunction` (like the notations for other arithmetic
functions) and also in the locale `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt`.
-/
namespace ArithmeticFunction
open Finset Nat
open scoped ArithmeticFunction
/-- `log` as an arithmetic function `ℕ → ℝ`. Note this is in the `ArithmeticFunction`
namespace to indicate that it is bundled as an `ArithmeticFunction` rather than being the usual
real logarithm. -/
noncomputable def log : ArithmeticFunction ℝ :=
⟨fun n => Real.log n, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.log ArithmeticFunction.log
@[simp]
theorem log_apply {n : ℕ} : log n = Real.log n :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.log_apply ArithmeticFunction.log_apply
/--
The `vonMangoldt` function is the function on natural numbers that returns `log p` if the input can
be expressed as `p^k` for a prime `p`.
In the case when `n` is a prime power, `min_fac` will give the appropriate prime, as it is the
smallest prime factor.
In the `ArithmeticFunction` locale, we have the notation `Λ` for this function.
This is also available in the `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt` locale, allowing for selective
access to the notation.
-/
noncomputable def vonMangoldt : ArithmeticFunction ℝ :=
⟨fun n => if IsPrimePow n then Real.log (minFac n) else 0, if_neg not_isPrimePow_zero⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.von_mangoldt ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt
@[inherit_doc] scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Λ" => ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt
@[inherit_doc] scoped[ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt] notation "Λ" =>
ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt
theorem vonMangoldt_apply {n : ℕ} : Λ n = if IsPrimePow n then Real.log (minFac n) else 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.von_mangoldt_apply ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_apply
@[simp]
theorem vonMangoldt_apply_one : Λ 1 = 0 := by simp [vonMangoldt_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.von_mangoldt_apply_one ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_apply_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/VonMangoldt.lean | 83 | 87 | theorem vonMangoldt_nonneg {n : ℕ} : 0 ≤ Λ n := by |
rw [vonMangoldt_apply]
split_ifs
· exact Real.log_nonneg (one_le_cast.2 (Nat.minFac_pos n))
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Log
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.base from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
/-!
# Real logarithm base `b`
In this file we define `Real.logb` to be the logarithm of a real number in a given base `b`. We
define this as the division of the natural logarithms of the argument and the base, so that we have
a globally defined function with `logb b 0 = 0`, `logb b (-x) = logb b x` `logb 0 x = 0` and
`logb (-b) x = logb b x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and its relation to `rpow`.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {b x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm in a given base. As with the natural logarithm, we define `logb b x` to
be `logb b |x|` for `x < 0`, and `0` for `x = 0`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def logb (b x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log x / log b
#align real.logb Real.logb
theorem log_div_log : log x / log b = logb b x :=
rfl
#align real.log_div_log Real.log_div_log
@[simp]
theorem logb_zero : logb b 0 = 0 := by simp [logb]
#align real.logb_zero Real.logb_zero
@[simp]
theorem logb_one : logb b 1 = 0 := by simp [logb]
#align real.logb_one Real.logb_one
@[simp]
lemma logb_self_eq_one (hb : 1 < b) : logb b b = 1 :=
div_self (log_pos hb).ne'
lemma logb_self_eq_one_iff : logb b b = 1 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ -1 :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h h' => by simp [logb, h'] at h, div_self⟩ log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem logb_abs (x : ℝ) : logb b |x| = logb b x := by rw [logb, logb, log_abs]
#align real.logb_abs Real.logb_abs
@[simp]
theorem logb_neg_eq_logb (x : ℝ) : logb b (-x) = logb b x := by
rw [← logb_abs x, ← logb_abs (-x), abs_neg]
#align real.logb_neg_eq_logb Real.logb_neg_eq_logb
theorem logb_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x * y) = logb b x + logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_mul hx hy, add_div]
#align real.logb_mul Real.logb_mul
theorem logb_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x / y) = logb b x - logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_div hx hy, sub_div]
#align real.logb_div Real.logb_div
@[simp]
theorem logb_inv (x : ℝ) : logb b x⁻¹ = -logb b x := by simp [logb, neg_div]
#align real.logb_inv Real.logb_inv
theorem inv_logb (a b : ℝ) : (logb a b)⁻¹ = logb b a := by simp_rw [logb, inv_div]
#align real.inv_logb Real.inv_logb
theorem inv_logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a * b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_mul h₁ h₂
#align real.inv_logb_mul_base Real.inv_logb_mul_base
theorem inv_logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a / b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_div h₁ h₂
#align real.inv_logb_div_base Real.inv_logb_div_base
theorem logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a * b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_mul_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
#align real.logb_mul_base Real.logb_mul_base
theorem logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a / b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_div_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
#align real.logb_div_base Real.logb_div_base
theorem mul_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : b ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) (h₃ : b ≠ -1) :
logb a b * logb b c = logb a c := by
unfold logb
rw [mul_comm, div_mul_div_cancel _ (log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)]
#align real.mul_logb Real.mul_logb
theorem div_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ 1) (h₃ : c ≠ -1) :
logb a c / logb b c = logb a b :=
div_div_div_cancel_left' _ _ <| log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
#align real.div_logb Real.div_logb
theorem logb_rpow_eq_mul_logb_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : logb b (x ^ y) = y * logb b x := by
rw [logb, log_rpow hx, logb, mul_div_assoc]
theorem logb_pow {k : ℕ} (hx : 0 < x) : logb b (x ^ k) = k * logb b x := by
rw [← rpow_natCast, logb_rpow_eq_mul_logb_of_pos hx]
section BPosAndNeOne
variable (b_pos : 0 < b) (b_ne_one : b ≠ 1)
private theorem log_b_ne_zero : log b ≠ 0 := by
have b_ne_zero : b ≠ 0 := by linarith
have b_ne_minus_one : b ≠ -1 := by linarith
simp [b_ne_one, b_ne_zero, b_ne_minus_one]
@[simp]
theorem logb_rpow : logb b (b ^ x) = x := by
rw [logb, div_eq_iff, log_rpow b_pos]
exact log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one
#align real.logb_rpow Real.logb_rpow
theorem rpow_logb_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ logb b x = |x| := by
apply log_injOn_pos
· simp only [Set.mem_Ioi]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· simp only [abs_pos, mem_Ioi, Ne, hx, not_false_iff]
rw [log_rpow b_pos, logb, log_abs]
field_simp [log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one]
#align real.rpow_logb_eq_abs Real.rpow_logb_eq_abs
@[simp]
theorem rpow_logb (hx : 0 < x) : b ^ logb b x = x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.rpow_logb Real.rpow_logb
theorem rpow_logb_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : b ^ logb b x = -x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
#align real.rpow_logb_of_neg Real.rpow_logb_of_neg
theorem logb_eq_iff_rpow_eq (hy : 0 < y) : logb b y = x ↔ b ^ x = y := by
constructor <;> rintro rfl
· exact rpow_logb b_pos b_ne_one hy
· exact logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one
theorem surjOn_logb : SurjOn (logb b) (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨b ^ x, rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
#align real.surj_on_logb Real.surjOn_logb
theorem logb_surjective : Surjective (logb b) := fun x => ⟨b ^ x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
#align real.logb_surjective Real.logb_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_logb : range (logb b) = univ :=
(logb_surjective b_pos b_ne_one).range_eq
#align real.range_logb Real.range_logb
theorem surjOn_logb' : SurjOn (logb b) (Iio 0) univ := by
intro x _
use -b ^ x
constructor
· simp only [Right.neg_neg_iff, Set.mem_Iio]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· rw [logb_neg_eq_logb, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one]
#align real.surj_on_logb' Real.surjOn_logb'
end BPosAndNeOne
section OneLtB
variable (hb : 1 < b)
private theorem b_pos : 0 < b := by linarith
-- Porting note: prime added to avoid clashing with `b_ne_one` further down the file
private theorem b_ne_one' : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
@[simp]
theorem logb_le_logb (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_right (log_pos hb), log_le_log_iff h h₁]
#align real.logb_le_logb Real.logb_le_logb
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_le_logb_of_le (h : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y :=
(logb_le_logb hb h (by linarith)).mpr hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_lt_logb (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b x < logb b y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right (log_pos hb)]
exact log_lt_log hx hxy
#align real.logb_lt_logb Real.logb_lt_logb
@[simp]
theorem logb_lt_logb_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : logb b x < logb b y ↔ x < y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right (log_pos hb)]
exact log_lt_log_iff hx hy
#align real.logb_lt_logb_iff Real.logb_lt_logb_iff
theorem logb_le_iff_le_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ b ^ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hx]
#align real.logb_le_iff_le_rpow Real.logb_le_iff_le_rpow
theorem logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ x < b ^ y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hx]
#align real.logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow Real.logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow
theorem le_logb_iff_rpow_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ b ^ x ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hy]
#align real.le_logb_iff_rpow_le Real.le_logb_iff_rpow_le
theorem lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ b ^ x < y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hy]
#align real.lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt Real.lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt
theorem logb_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← @logb_one b]
rw [logb_lt_logb_iff hb zero_lt_one hx]
#align real.logb_pos_iff Real.logb_pos_iff
theorem logb_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < logb b x := by
rw [logb_pos_iff hb (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
exact hx
#align real.logb_pos Real.logb_pos
theorem logb_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← logb_one]
exact logb_lt_logb_iff hb h zero_lt_one
#align real.logb_neg_iff Real.logb_neg_iff
theorem logb_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff hb h0).2 h1
#align real.logb_neg Real.logb_neg
theorem logb_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff hb hx, not_lt]
#align real.logb_nonneg_iff Real.logb_nonneg_iff
theorem logb_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ logb b x :=
(logb_nonneg_iff hb (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
#align real.logb_nonneg Real.logb_nonneg
theorem logb_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff hb hx, not_lt]
#align real.logb_nonpos_iff Real.logb_nonpos_iff
theorem logb_nonpos_iff' (hx : 0 ≤ x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
exact logb_nonpos_iff hb hx
#align real.logb_nonpos_iff' Real.logb_nonpos_iff'
theorem logb_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : logb b x ≤ 0 :=
(logb_nonpos_iff' hb hx).2 h'x
#align real.logb_nonpos Real.logb_nonpos
theorem strictMonoOn_logb : StrictMonoOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy =>
logb_lt_logb hb hx hxy
#align real.strict_mono_on_logb Real.strictMonoOn_logb
theorem strictAntiOn_logb : StrictAntiOn (logb b) (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x]
refine logb_lt_logb hb (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
#align real.strict_anti_on_logb Real.strictAntiOn_logb
theorem logb_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
(strictMonoOn_logb hb).injOn
#align real.logb_inj_on_pos Real.logb_injOn_pos
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) : x = 1 :=
logb_injOn_pos hb (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.logb_one.symm)
#align real.eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero Real.eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero
theorem logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : logb b x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero hb hx_pos) hx
#align real.logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one Real.logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one
theorem tendsto_logb_atTop : Tendsto (logb b) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.atTop_div_const (log_pos hb) tendsto_log_atTop
#align real.tendsto_logb_at_top Real.tendsto_logb_atTop
end OneLtB
section BPosAndBLtOne
variable (b_pos : 0 < b) (b_lt_one : b < 1)
private theorem b_ne_one : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
@[simp]
theorem logb_le_logb_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one), log_le_log_iff h₁ h]
#align real.logb_le_logb_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_le_logb_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b y < logb b x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)]
exact log_lt_log hx hxy
#align real.logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) :
logb b x < logb b y ↔ y < x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)]
exact log_lt_log_iff hy hx
#align real.logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ b ^ y ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
#align real.logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ b ^ y < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
#align real.logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow_of_base_lt_one
theorem le_logb_iff_rpow_le_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ b ^ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
#align real.le_logb_iff_rpow_le_of_base_lt_one Real.le_logb_iff_rpow_le_of_base_lt_one
theorem lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ y < b ^ x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
#align real.lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt_of_base_lt_one Real.lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one zero_lt_one hx]
#align real.logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_pos_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x < 1) : 0 < logb b x := by
rw [logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx]
exact hx'
#align real.logb_pos_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_pos_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one h zero_lt_one]
#align real.logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_neg_of_base_lt_one (h1 : 1 < x) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (lt_trans zero_lt_one h1)).2 h1
#align real.logb_neg_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_neg_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
#align real.logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_nonneg_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) : 0 ≤ logb b x := by
rw [logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx]
exact hx'
#align real.logb_nonneg_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_nonneg_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_nonpos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
#align real.logb_nonpos_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_nonpos_iff_of_base_lt_one
theorem strictAntiOn_logb_of_base_lt_one : StrictAntiOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy =>
logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx hxy
#align real.strict_anti_on_logb_of_base_lt_one Real.strictAntiOn_logb_of_base_lt_one
theorem strictMonoOn_logb_of_base_lt_one : StrictMonoOn (logb b) (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x]
refine logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
#align real.strict_mono_on_logb_of_base_lt_one Real.strictMonoOn_logb_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_injOn_pos_of_base_lt_one : Set.InjOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
(strictAntiOn_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one).injOn
#align real.logb_inj_on_pos_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_injOn_pos_of_base_lt_one
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) : x = 1 :=
logb_injOn_pos_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one)
(h₂.trans Real.logb_one.symm)
#align real.eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one Real.eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one
theorem logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one_of_base_lt_one (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : logb b x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx_pos) hx
#align real.logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one_of_base_lt_one Real.logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one_of_base_lt_one
theorem tendsto_logb_atTop_of_base_lt_one : Tendsto (logb b) atTop atBot := by
rw [tendsto_atTop_atBot]
intro e
use 1 ⊔ b ^ e
intro a
simp only [and_imp, sup_le_iff]
intro ha
rw [logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one]
· tauto
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ha
#align real.tendsto_logb_at_top_of_base_lt_one Real.tendsto_logb_atTop_of_base_lt_one
end BPosAndBLtOne
theorem floor_logb_natCast {b : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (hb : 1 < b) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
⌊logb b r⌋ = Int.log b r := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [logb_zero, Int.log_zero_right, Int.floor_zero]
have hb1' : 1 < (b : ℝ) := Nat.one_lt_cast.mpr hb
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← Int.zpow_le_iff_le_log hb hr, ← rpow_intCast b]
refine le_of_le_of_eq ?_ (rpow_logb (zero_lt_one.trans hb1') hb1'.ne' hr)
exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hb1'.le (Int.floor_le _)
· rw [Int.le_floor, le_logb_iff_rpow_le hb1' hr, rpow_intCast]
exact Int.zpow_log_le_self hb hr
#align real.floor_logb_nat_cast Real.floor_logb_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias floor_logb_nat_cast := floor_logb_natCast
theorem ceil_logb_natCast {b : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (hb : 1 < b) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
⌈logb b r⌉ = Int.clog b r := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [logb_zero, Int.clog_zero_right, Int.ceil_zero]
have hb1' : 1 < (b : ℝ) := Nat.one_lt_cast.mpr hb
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Int.ceil_le, logb_le_iff_le_rpow hb1' hr, rpow_intCast]
exact Int.self_le_zpow_clog hb r
· rw [← Int.le_zpow_iff_clog_le hb hr, ← rpow_intCast b]
refine (rpow_logb (zero_lt_one.trans hb1') hb1'.ne' hr).symm.trans_le ?_
exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hb1'.le (Int.le_ceil _)
#align real.ceil_logb_nat_cast Real.ceil_logb_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ceil_logb_nat_cast := ceil_logb_natCast
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Base.lean | 441 | 443 | theorem logb_eq_zero : logb b x = 0 ↔ b = 0 ∨ b = 1 ∨ b = -1 ∨ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by |
simp_rw [logb, div_eq_zero_iff, log_eq_zero]
tauto
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
#align_import algebra.group_with_zero.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
/-!
# Typeclasses for groups with an adjoined zero element
This file provides just the typeclass definitions, and the projection lemmas that expose their
members.
## Main definitions
* `GroupWithZero`
* `CommGroupWithZero`
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
universe u
-- We have to fix the universe of `G₀` here, since the default argument to
-- `GroupWithZero.div'` cannot contain a universe metavariable.
variable {G₀ : Type u} {M₀ M₀' G₀' : Type*}
/-- Typeclass for expressing that a type `M₀` with multiplication and a zero satisfies
`0 * a = 0` and `a * 0 = 0` for all `a : M₀`. -/
class MulZeroClass (M₀ : Type u) extends Mul M₀, Zero M₀ where
/-- Zero is a left absorbing element for multiplication -/
zero_mul : ∀ a : M₀, 0 * a = 0
/-- Zero is a right absorbing element for multiplication -/
mul_zero : ∀ a : M₀, a * 0 = 0
#align mul_zero_class MulZeroClass
/-- A mixin for left cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsLeftCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication by a nonzero element is left cancellative. -/
protected mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, a ≠ 0 → a * b = a * c → b = c
#align is_left_cancel_mul_zero IsLeftCancelMulZero
section IsLeftCancelMulZero
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_left_cancel₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a * b = a * c) : b = c :=
IsLeftCancelMulZero.mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero ha h
#align mul_left_cancel₀ mul_left_cancel₀
theorem mul_right_injective₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : Function.Injective (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ => mul_left_cancel₀ ha
#align mul_right_injective₀ mul_right_injective₀
end IsLeftCancelMulZero
/-- A mixin for right cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsRightCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- Multiplicatin by a nonzero element is right cancellative. -/
protected mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, b ≠ 0 → a * b = c * b → a = c
#align is_right_cancel_mul_zero IsRightCancelMulZero
section IsRightCancelMulZero
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_right_cancel₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c * b) : a = c :=
IsRightCancelMulZero.mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero hb h
#align mul_right_cancel₀ mul_right_cancel₀
theorem mul_left_injective₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun a => a * b :=
fun _ _ => mul_right_cancel₀ hb
#align mul_left_injective₀ mul_left_injective₀
end IsRightCancelMulZero
/-- A mixin for cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀]
extends IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀, IsRightCancelMulZero M₀ : Prop
#align is_cancel_mul_zero IsCancelMulZero
export MulZeroClass (zero_mul mul_zero)
attribute [simp] zero_mul mul_zero
#align zero_mul MulZeroClass.zero_mul
#align mul_zero MulZeroClass.mul_zero
/-- Predicate typeclass for expressing that `a * b = 0` implies `a = 0` or `b = 0`
for all `a` and `b` of type `G₀`. -/
class NoZeroDivisors (M₀ : Type*) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- For all `a` and `b` of `G₀`, `a * b = 0` implies `a = 0` or `b = 0`. -/
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {a b : M₀}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0
#align no_zero_divisors NoZeroDivisors
export NoZeroDivisors (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero)
/-- A type `S₀` is a "semigroup with zero” if it is a semigroup with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
class SemigroupWithZero (S₀ : Type u) extends Semigroup S₀, MulZeroClass S₀
#align semigroup_with_zero SemigroupWithZero
/-- A typeclass for non-associative monoids with zero elements. -/
class MulZeroOneClass (M₀ : Type u) extends MulOneClass M₀, MulZeroClass M₀
#align mul_zero_one_class MulZeroOneClass
/-- A type `M₀` is a “monoid with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
class MonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type u) extends Monoid M₀, MulZeroOneClass M₀, SemigroupWithZero M₀
#align monoid_with_zero MonoidWithZero
/-- A type `M` is a `CancelMonoidWithZero` if it is a monoid with zero element, `0` is left
and right absorbing, and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
class CancelMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends MonoidWithZero M₀, IsCancelMulZero M₀
#align cancel_monoid_with_zero CancelMonoidWithZero
/-- A type `M` is a commutative “monoid with zero” if it is a commutative monoid with zero
element, and `0` is left and right absorbing. -/
class CommMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoid M₀, MonoidWithZero M₀
#align comm_monoid_with_zero CommMonoidWithZero
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_left_inj' (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b :=
(mul_left_injective₀ hc).eq_iff
#align mul_left_inj' mul_left_inj'
theorem mul_right_inj' (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_right_injective₀ ha).eq_iff
#align mul_right_inj' mul_right_inj'
end CancelMonoidWithZero
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup M₀] [Zero M₀]
lemma IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isRightCancelMulZero [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsRightCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero :=
fun hb h => mul_left_cancel₀ hb <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _)) }
#align is_left_cancel_mul_zero.to_is_right_cancel_mul_zero IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isRightCancelMulZero
lemma IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isLeftCancelMulZero [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero :=
fun hb h => mul_right_cancel₀ hb <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _)) }
#align is_right_cancel_mul_zero.to_is_left_cancel_mul_zero IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isLeftCancelMulZero
lemma IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isRightCancelMulZero with }
#align is_left_cancel_mul_zero.to_is_cancel_mul_zero IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero
lemma IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isLeftCancelMulZero with }
#align is_right_cancel_mul_zero.to_is_cancel_mul_zero IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero
end CommSemigroup
/-- A type `M` is a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` if it is a commutative monoid with zero element,
`0` is left and right absorbing,
and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
class CancelCommMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoidWithZero M₀, IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀
#align cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero CancelCommMonoidWithZero
-- See note [lower cancel priority]
attribute [instance 75] CancelCommMonoidWithZero.toCommMonoidWithZero
instance (priority := 100) CancelCommMonoidWithZero.toCancelMonoidWithZero
[CancelCommMonoidWithZero M₀] : CancelMonoidWithZero M₀ :=
{ IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero (M₀ := M₀) with }
/-- Prop-valued mixin for a monoid with zero to be equipped with a cancelling division.
The obvious use case is groups with zero, but this condition is also satisfied by `ℕ`, `ℤ` and, more
generally, any euclidean domain. -/
class MulDivCancelClass (M₀ : Type*) [MonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] : Prop where
protected mul_div_cancel (a b : M₀) : b ≠ 0 → a * b / b = a
section MulDivCancelClass
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] [MulDivCancelClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
@[simp] lemma mul_div_cancel_right₀ (a : M₀) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
MulDivCancelClass.mul_div_cancel _ _ hb
#align mul_div_cancel mul_div_cancel_right₀
end MulDivCancelClass
section MulDivCancelClass
variable [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] [MulDivCancelClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
@[simp] lemma mul_div_cancel_left₀ (b : M₀) (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b / a = b := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ ha]
#align mul_div_cancel_left mul_div_cancel_left₀
end MulDivCancelClass
/-- A type `G₀` is a “group with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element (distinct from `1`)
such that every nonzero element is invertible.
The type is required to come with an “inverse” function, and the inverse of `0` must be `0`.
Examples include division rings and the ordered monoids that are the
target of valuations in general valuation theory. -/
class GroupWithZero (G₀ : Type u) extends MonoidWithZero G₀, DivInvMonoid G₀, Nontrivial G₀ where
/-- The inverse of `0` in a group with zero is `0`. -/
inv_zero : (0 : G₀)⁻¹ = 0
/-- Every nonzero element of a group with zero is invertible. -/
protected mul_inv_cancel (a : G₀) : a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1
#align group_with_zero GroupWithZero
export GroupWithZero (inv_zero)
attribute [simp] inv_zero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a : G₀}
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := GroupWithZero.mul_inv_cancel a h
#align mul_inv_cancel mul_inv_cancel
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GroupWithZero.toMulDivCancelClass : MulDivCancelClass G₀ where
mul_div_cancel a b hb := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hb, mul_one]
end GroupWithZero
/-- A type `G₀` is a commutative “group with zero”
if it is a commutative monoid with zero element (distinct from `1`)
such that every nonzero element is invertible.
The type is required to come with an “inverse” function, and the inverse of `0` must be `0`. -/
class CommGroupWithZero (G₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoidWithZero G₀, GroupWithZero G₀
#align comm_group_with_zero CommGroupWithZero
section
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {x : M₀}
lemma eq_zero_or_one_of_sq_eq_self (hx : x ^ 2 = x) : x = 0 ∨ x = 1 :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr (mul_left_injective₀ · <| by simpa [sq] using hx)
end
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b c g h x : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right₀ (h : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
calc
a * b * b⁻¹ = a * (b * b⁻¹) := mul_assoc _ _ _
_ = a := by simp [h]
#align mul_inv_cancel_right₀ mul_inv_cancel_right₀
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left₀ (h : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
calc
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = a * a⁻¹ * b := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
_ = b := by simp [h]
#align mul_inv_cancel_left₀ mul_inv_cancel_left₀
end GroupWithZero
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀]
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_left {a : M₀} (h : a = 0) (b : M₀) : a * b = 0 := h.symm ▸ zero_mul b
#align mul_eq_zero_of_left mul_eq_zero_of_left
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_right (a : M₀) {b : M₀} (h : b = 0) : a * b = 0 := h.symm ▸ mul_zero a
#align mul_eq_zero_of_right mul_eq_zero_of_right
variable [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {a b : M₀}
/-- If `α` has no zero divisors, then the product of two elements equals zero iff one of them
equals zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_zero : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero,
fun o => o.elim (fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h b) (mul_eq_zero_of_right a)⟩
#align mul_eq_zero mul_eq_zero
/-- If `α` has no zero divisors, then the product of two elements equals zero iff one of them
equals zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_mul : 0 = a * b ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_zero]
#align zero_eq_mul zero_eq_mul
/-- If `α` has no zero divisors, then the product of two elements is nonzero iff both of them
are nonzero. -/
theorem mul_ne_zero_iff : a * b ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 := mul_eq_zero.not.trans not_or
#align mul_ne_zero_iff mul_ne_zero_iff
/-- If `α` has no zero divisors, then for elements `a, b : α`, `a * b` equals zero iff so is
`b * a`. -/
theorem mul_eq_zero_comm : a * b = 0 ↔ b * a = 0 :=
mul_eq_zero.trans <| or_comm.trans mul_eq_zero.symm
#align mul_eq_zero_comm mul_eq_zero_comm
/-- If `α` has no zero divisors, then for elements `a, b : α`, `a * b` is nonzero iff so is
`b * a`. -/
theorem mul_ne_zero_comm : a * b ≠ 0 ↔ b * a ≠ 0 := mul_eq_zero_comm.not
#align mul_ne_zero_comm mul_ne_zero_comm
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean | 309 | 309 | theorem mul_self_eq_zero : a * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import analysis.normed.group.quotient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Quotients of seminormed groups
For any `SeminormedAddCommGroup M` and any `S : AddSubgroup M`, we provide a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup`, the group quotient `M ⧸ S`.
If `S` is closed, we provide `NormedAddCommGroup (M ⧸ S)` (regardless of whether `M` itself is
separated). The two main properties of these structures are the underlying topology is the quotient
topology and the projection is a normed group homomorphism which is norm non-increasing
(better, it has operator norm exactly one unless `S` is dense in `M`). The corresponding
universal property is that every normed group hom defined on `M` which vanishes on `S` descends
to a normed group hom defined on `M ⧸ S`.
This file also introduces a predicate `IsQuotient` characterizing normed group homs that
are isomorphic to the canonical projection onto a normed group quotient.
In addition, this file also provides normed structures for quotients of modules by submodules, and
of (commutative) rings by ideals. The `SeminormedAddCommGroup` and `NormedAddCommGroup`
instances described above are transferred directly, but we also define instances of `NormedSpace`,
`SeminormedCommRing`, `NormedCommRing` and `NormedAlgebra` under appropriate type class
assumptions on the original space. Moreover, while `QuotientAddGroup.completeSpace` works
out-of-the-box for quotients of `NormedAddCommGroup`s by `AddSubgroup`s, we need to transfer
this instance in `Submodule.Quotient.completeSpace` so that it applies to these other quotients.
## Main definitions
We use `M` and `N` to denote seminormed groups and `S : AddSubgroup M`.
All the following definitions are in the `AddSubgroup` namespace. Hence we can access
`AddSubgroup.normedMk S` as `S.normedMk`.
* `seminormedAddCommGroupQuotient` : The seminormed group structure on the quotient by
an additive subgroup. This is an instance so there is no need to explicitly use it.
* `normedAddCommGroupQuotient` : The normed group structure on the quotient by
a closed additive subgroup. This is an instance so there is no need to explicitly use it.
* `normedMk S` : the normed group hom from `M` to `M ⧸ S`.
* `lift S f hf`: implements the universal property of `M ⧸ S`. Here
`(f : NormedAddGroupHom M N)`, `(hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s = 0)` and
`lift S f hf : NormedAddGroupHom (M ⧸ S) N`.
* `IsQuotient`: given `f : NormedAddGroupHom M N`, `IsQuotient f` means `N` is isomorphic
to a quotient of `M` by a subgroup, with projection `f`. Technically it asserts `f` is
surjective and the norm of `f x` is the infimum of the norms of `x + m` for `m` in `f.ker`.
## Main results
* `norm_normedMk` : the operator norm of the projection is `1` if the subspace is not dense.
* `IsQuotient.norm_lift`: Provided `f : normed_hom M N` satisfies `IsQuotient f`, for every
`n : N` and positive `ε`, there exists `m` such that `f m = n ∧ ‖m‖ < ‖n‖ + ε`.
## Implementation details
For any `SeminormedAddCommGroup M` and any `S : AddSubgroup M` we define a norm on `M ⧸ S` by
`‖x‖ = sInf (norm '' {m | mk' S m = x})`. This formula is really an implementation detail, it
shouldn't be needed outside of this file setting up the theory.
Since `M ⧸ S` is automatically a topological space (as any quotient of a topological space),
one needs to be careful while defining the `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance to avoid having two
different topologies on this quotient. This is not purely a technological issue.
Mathematically there is something to prove. The main point is proved in the auxiliary lemma
`quotient_nhd_basis` that has no use beyond this verification and states that zero in the quotient
admits as basis of neighborhoods in the quotient topology the sets `{x | ‖x‖ < ε}` for positive `ε`.
Once this mathematical point is settled, we have two topologies that are propositionally equal. This
is not good enough for the type class system. As usual we ensure *definitional* equality
using forgetful inheritance, see Note [forgetful inheritance]. A (semi)-normed group structure
includes a uniform space structure which includes a topological space structure, together
with propositional fields asserting compatibility conditions.
The usual way to define a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` is to let Lean build a uniform space structure
using the provided norm, and then trivially build a proof that the norm and uniform structure are
compatible. Here the uniform structure is provided using `TopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace`
which uses the topological structure and the group structure to build the uniform structure. This
uniform structure induces the correct topological structure by construction, but the fact that it
is compatible with the norm is not obvious; this is where the mathematical content explained in
the previous paragraph kicks in.
-/
noncomputable section
open QuotientAddGroup Metric Set Topology NNReal
variable {M N : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup M] [SeminormedAddCommGroup N]
/-- The definition of the norm on the quotient by an additive subgroup. -/
noncomputable instance normOnQuotient (S : AddSubgroup M) : Norm (M ⧸ S) where
norm x := sInf (norm '' { m | mk' S m = x })
#align norm_on_quotient normOnQuotient
theorem AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
‖x‖ = sInf (norm '' { m : M | (m : M ⧸ S) = x }) :=
rfl
#align add_subgroup.quotient_norm_eq AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq
theorem QuotientAddGroup.norm_eq_infDist {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
‖x‖ = infDist 0 { m : M | (m : M ⧸ S) = x } := by
simp only [AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq, infDist_eq_iInf, sInf_image', dist_zero_left]
/-- An alternative definition of the norm on the quotient group: the norm of `((x : M) : M ⧸ S)` is
equal to the distance from `x` to `S`. -/
theorem QuotientAddGroup.norm_mk {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M) :
‖(x : M ⧸ S)‖ = infDist x S := by
rw [norm_eq_infDist, ← infDist_image (IsometryEquiv.subLeft x).isometry,
IsometryEquiv.subLeft_apply, sub_zero, ← IsometryEquiv.preimage_symm]
congr 1 with y
simp only [mem_preimage, IsometryEquiv.subLeft_symm_apply, mem_setOf_eq, QuotientAddGroup.eq,
neg_add, neg_neg, neg_add_cancel_right, SetLike.mem_coe]
theorem image_norm_nonempty {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
(norm '' { m | mk' S m = x }).Nonempty :=
.image _ <| Quot.exists_rep x
#align image_norm_nonempty image_norm_nonempty
theorem bddBelow_image_norm (s : Set M) : BddBelow (norm '' s) :=
⟨0, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ _ ↦ norm_nonneg _⟩
#align bdd_below_image_norm bddBelow_image_norm
theorem isGLB_quotient_norm {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
IsGLB (norm '' { m | mk' S m = x }) (‖x‖) :=
isGLB_csInf (image_norm_nonempty x) (bddBelow_image_norm _)
/-- The norm on the quotient satisfies `‖-x‖ = ‖x‖`. -/
theorem quotient_norm_neg {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) : ‖-x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq]
congr 1 with r
constructor <;> { rintro ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩; use -m; simpa [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] using hm }
#align quotient_norm_neg quotient_norm_neg
theorem quotient_norm_sub_rev {S : AddSubgroup M} (x y : M ⧸ S) : ‖x - y‖ = ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [← neg_sub, quotient_norm_neg]
#align quotient_norm_sub_rev quotient_norm_sub_rev
/-- The norm of the projection is smaller or equal to the norm of the original element. -/
theorem quotient_norm_mk_le (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) : ‖mk' S m‖ ≤ ‖m‖ :=
csInf_le (bddBelow_image_norm _) <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ rfl
#align quotient_norm_mk_le quotient_norm_mk_le
/-- The norm of the projection is smaller or equal to the norm of the original element. -/
theorem quotient_norm_mk_le' (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) : ‖(m : M ⧸ S)‖ ≤ ‖m‖ :=
quotient_norm_mk_le S m
#align quotient_norm_mk_le' quotient_norm_mk_le'
/-- The norm of the image under the natural morphism to the quotient. -/
theorem quotient_norm_mk_eq (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) :
‖mk' S m‖ = sInf ((‖m + ·‖) '' S) := by
rw [mk'_apply, norm_mk, sInf_image', ← infDist_image isometry_neg, image_neg,
neg_coe_set (H := S), infDist_eq_iInf]
simp only [dist_eq_norm', sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm]
#align quotient_norm_mk_eq quotient_norm_mk_eq
/-- The quotient norm is nonnegative. -/
theorem quotient_norm_nonneg (S : AddSubgroup M) (x : M ⧸ S) : 0 ≤ ‖x‖ :=
Real.sInf_nonneg _ <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ _ ↦ norm_nonneg _
#align quotient_norm_nonneg quotient_norm_nonneg
/-- The quotient norm is nonnegative. -/
theorem norm_mk_nonneg (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) : 0 ≤ ‖mk' S m‖ :=
quotient_norm_nonneg S _
#align norm_mk_nonneg norm_mk_nonneg
/-- The norm of the image of `m : M` in the quotient by `S` is zero if and only if `m` belongs
to the closure of `S`. -/
theorem quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) :
‖mk' S m‖ = 0 ↔ m ∈ closure (S : Set M) := by
rw [mk'_apply, norm_mk, ← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero]
exact ⟨0, S.zero_mem⟩
#align quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff
theorem QuotientAddGroup.norm_lt_iff {S : AddSubgroup M} {x : M ⧸ S} {r : ℝ} :
‖x‖ < r ↔ ∃ m : M, ↑m = x ∧ ‖m‖ < r := by
rw [isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_quotient_norm _), exists_mem_image]
rfl
/-- For any `x : M ⧸ S` and any `0 < ε`, there is `m : M` such that `mk' S m = x`
and `‖m‖ < ‖x‖ + ε`. -/
theorem norm_mk_lt {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ m : M, mk' S m = x ∧ ‖m‖ < ‖x‖ + ε :=
norm_lt_iff.1 <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
#align norm_mk_lt norm_mk_lt
/-- For any `m : M` and any `0 < ε`, there is `s ∈ S` such that `‖m + s‖ < ‖mk' S m‖ + ε`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Quotient.lean | 200 | 206 | theorem norm_mk_lt' (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ s ∈ S, ‖m + s‖ < ‖mk' S m‖ + ε := by |
obtain ⟨n : M, hn : mk' S n = mk' S m, hn' : ‖n‖ < ‖mk' S m‖ + ε⟩ :=
norm_mk_lt (QuotientAddGroup.mk' S m) hε
erw [eq_comm, QuotientAddGroup.eq] at hn
use -m + n, hn
rwa [add_neg_cancel_left]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.IteratedDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.WithSeminorms
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.ZeroAtInfty
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.JapaneseBracket
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformFilterBasis
import Mathlib.Tactic.MoveAdd
#align_import analysis.schwartz_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e137999b2c6f2be388f4cd3bbf8523de1910cd2b"
/-!
# Schwartz space
This file defines the Schwartz space. Usually, the Schwartz space is defined as the set of smooth
functions $f : ℝ^n → ℂ$ such that there exists $C_{αβ} > 0$ with $$|x^α ∂^β f(x)| < C_{αβ}$$ for
all $x ∈ ℝ^n$ and for all multiindices $α, β$.
In mathlib, we use a slightly different approach and define the Schwartz space as all
smooth functions `f : E → F`, where `E` and `F` are real normed vector spaces such that for all
natural numbers `k` and `n` we have uniform bounds `‖x‖^k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ < C`.
This approach completely avoids using partial derivatives as well as polynomials.
We construct the topology on the Schwartz space by a family of seminorms, which are the best
constants in the above estimates. The abstract theory of topological vector spaces developed in
`SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis` and `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace` turns the
Schwartz space into a locally convex topological vector space.
## Main definitions
* `SchwartzMap`: The Schwartz space is the space of smooth functions such that all derivatives
decay faster than any power of `‖x‖`.
* `SchwartzMap.seminorm`: The family of seminorms as described above
* `SchwartzMap.fderivCLM`: The differential as a continuous linear map
`𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(E, E →L[ℝ] F)`
* `SchwartzMap.derivCLM`: The one-dimensional derivative as a continuous linear map
`𝓢(ℝ, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(ℝ, F)`
* `SchwartzMap.integralCLM`: Integration as a continuous linear map `𝓢(ℝ, F) →L[ℝ] F`
## Main statements
* `SchwartzMap.instUniformAddGroup` and `SchwartzMap.instLocallyConvexSpace`: The Schwartz space
is a locally convex topological vector space.
* `SchwartzMap.one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply`: For a Schwartz function `f` there is a uniform bound
on `(1 + ‖x‖) ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖`.
## Implementation details
The implementation of the seminorms is taken almost literally from `ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm`.
## Notation
* `𝓢(E, F)`: The Schwartz space `SchwartzMap E F` localized in `SchwartzSpace`
## Tags
Schwartz space, tempered distributions
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Nat NNReal
variable {𝕜 𝕜' D E F G V : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
variable (E F)
/-- A function is a Schwartz function if it is smooth and all derivatives decay faster than
any power of `‖x‖`. -/
structure SchwartzMap where
toFun : E → F
smooth' : ContDiff ℝ ⊤ toFun
decay' : ∀ k n : ℕ, ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n toFun x‖ ≤ C
#align schwartz_map SchwartzMap
/-- A function is a Schwartz function if it is smooth and all derivatives decay faster than
any power of `‖x‖`. -/
scoped[SchwartzMap] notation "𝓢(" E ", " F ")" => SchwartzMap E F
variable {E F}
namespace SchwartzMap
-- Porting note: removed
-- instance : Coe 𝓢(E, F) (E → F) := ⟨toFun⟩
instance instFunLike : FunLike 𝓢(E, F) E F where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
#align schwartz_map.fun_like SchwartzMap.instFunLike
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply `DFunLike.hasCoeToFun`. -/
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun 𝓢(E, F) fun _ => E → F :=
DFunLike.hasCoeToFun
#align schwartz_map.has_coe_to_fun SchwartzMap.instCoeFun
/-- All derivatives of a Schwartz function are rapidly decaying. -/
theorem decay (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (k n : ℕ) :
∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ C := by
rcases f.decay' k n with ⟨C, hC⟩
exact ⟨max C 1, by positivity, fun x => (hC x).trans (le_max_left _ _)⟩
#align schwartz_map.decay SchwartzMap.decay
/-- Every Schwartz function is smooth. -/
theorem smooth (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (n : ℕ∞) : ContDiff ℝ n f :=
f.smooth'.of_le le_top
#align schwartz_map.smooth SchwartzMap.smooth
/-- Every Schwartz function is continuous. -/
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : Continuous f :=
(f.smooth 0).continuous
#align schwartz_map.continuous SchwartzMap.continuous
instance instContinuousMapClass : ContinuousMapClass 𝓢(E, F) E F where
map_continuous := SchwartzMap.continuous
/-- Every Schwartz function is differentiable. -/
protected theorem differentiable (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : Differentiable ℝ f :=
(f.smooth 1).differentiable rfl.le
#align schwartz_map.differentiable SchwartzMap.differentiable
/-- Every Schwartz function is differentiable at any point. -/
protected theorem differentiableAt (f : 𝓢(E, F)) {x : E} : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
f.differentiable.differentiableAt
#align schwartz_map.differentiable_at SchwartzMap.differentiableAt
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : 𝓢(E, F)} (h : ∀ x, (f : E → F) x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align schwartz_map.ext SchwartzMap.ext
section IsBigO
open Asymptotics Filter
variable (f : 𝓢(E, F))
/-- Auxiliary lemma, used in proving the more general result `isBigO_cocompact_rpow`. -/
theorem isBigO_cocompact_zpow_neg_nat (k : ℕ) :
f =O[cocompact E] fun x => ‖x‖ ^ (-k : ℤ) := by
obtain ⟨d, _, hd'⟩ := f.decay k 0
simp only [norm_iteratedFDeriv_zero] at hd'
simp_rw [Asymptotics.IsBigO, Asymptotics.IsBigOWith]
refine ⟨d, Filter.Eventually.filter_mono Filter.cocompact_le_cofinite ?_⟩
refine (Filter.eventually_cofinite_ne 0).mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (zpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _), zpow_neg, ← div_eq_mul_inv, le_div_iff']
exacts [hd' x, zpow_pos_of_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) _]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align schwartz_map.is_O_cocompact_zpow_neg_nat SchwartzMap.isBigO_cocompact_zpow_neg_nat
theorem isBigO_cocompact_rpow [ProperSpace E] (s : ℝ) :
f =O[cocompact E] fun x => ‖x‖ ^ s := by
let k := ⌈-s⌉₊
have hk : -(k : ℝ) ≤ s := neg_le.mp (Nat.le_ceil (-s))
refine (isBigO_cocompact_zpow_neg_nat f k).trans ?_
suffices (fun x : ℝ => x ^ (-k : ℤ)) =O[atTop] fun x : ℝ => x ^ s
from this.comp_tendsto tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
simp_rw [Asymptotics.IsBigO, Asymptotics.IsBigOWith]
refine ⟨1, (Filter.eventually_ge_atTop 1).mono fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg (Real.rpow_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans hx) _),
Real.norm_of_nonneg (zpow_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans hx) _), ← Real.rpow_intCast, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_natCast]
exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hk
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align schwartz_map.is_O_cocompact_rpow SchwartzMap.isBigO_cocompact_rpow
theorem isBigO_cocompact_zpow [ProperSpace E] (k : ℤ) :
f =O[cocompact E] fun x => ‖x‖ ^ k := by
simpa only [Real.rpow_intCast] using isBigO_cocompact_rpow f k
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align schwartz_map.is_O_cocompact_zpow SchwartzMap.isBigO_cocompact_zpow
end IsBigO
section Aux
theorem bounds_nonempty (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
∃ c : ℝ, c ∈ { c : ℝ | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ c } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.decay k n
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
#align schwartz_map.bounds_nonempty SchwartzMap.bounds_nonempty
theorem bounds_bddBelow (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ c } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
#align schwartz_map.bounds_bdd_below SchwartzMap.bounds_bddBelow
theorem decay_add_le_aux (k n : ℕ) (f g : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n ((f : E → F) + (g : E → F)) x‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ + ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n g x‖ := by
rw [← mul_add]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (by positivity)
rw [iteratedFDeriv_add_apply (f.smooth _) (g.smooth _)]
exact norm_add_le _ _
#align schwartz_map.decay_add_le_aux SchwartzMap.decay_add_le_aux
theorem decay_neg_aux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (-f : E → F) x‖ = ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ := by
rw [iteratedFDeriv_neg_apply, norm_neg]
#align schwartz_map.decay_neg_aux SchwartzMap.decay_neg_aux
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
theorem decay_smul_aux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (c : 𝕜) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (c • (f : E → F)) x‖ =
‖c‖ * ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ := by
rw [mul_comm ‖c‖, mul_assoc, iteratedFDeriv_const_smul_apply (f.smooth _),
norm_smul c (iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (⇑f) x)]
#align schwartz_map.decay_smul_aux SchwartzMap.decay_smul_aux
end Aux
section SeminormAux
/-- Helper definition for the seminorms of the Schwartz space. -/
protected def seminormAux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : ℝ :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ c }
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_aux SchwartzMap.seminormAux
theorem seminormAux_nonneg (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : 0 ≤ f.seminormAux k n :=
le_csInf (bounds_nonempty k n f) fun _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => hx
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_aux_nonneg SchwartzMap.seminormAux_nonneg
theorem le_seminormAux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (⇑f) x‖ ≤ f.seminormAux k n :=
le_csInf (bounds_nonempty k n f) fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h x
#align schwartz_map.le_seminorm_aux SchwartzMap.le_seminormAux
/-- If one controls the norm of every `A x`, then one controls the norm of `A`. -/
theorem seminormAux_le_bound (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M)
(hM : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ M) : f.seminormAux k n ≤ M :=
csInf_le (bounds_bddBelow k n f) ⟨hMp, hM⟩
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_aux_le_bound SchwartzMap.seminormAux_le_bound
end SeminormAux
/-! ### Algebraic properties -/
section SMul
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] [NormedField 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜' F]
instance instSMul : SMul 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun c f =>
{ toFun := c • (f : E → F)
smooth' := (f.smooth _).const_smul c
decay' := fun k n => by
refine ⟨f.seminormAux k n * (‖c‖ + 1), fun x => ?_⟩
have hc : 0 ≤ ‖c‖ := by positivity
refine le_trans ?_ ((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_seminormAux k n x) hc).trans ?_)
· apply Eq.le
rw [mul_comm _ ‖c‖, ← mul_assoc]
exact decay_smul_aux k n f c x
· apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (f.seminormAux_nonneg k n)
linarith }⟩
#align schwartz_map.has_smul SchwartzMap.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : 𝓢(E, F)} {c : 𝕜} {x : E} : (c • f) x = c • f x :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.smul_apply SchwartzMap.smul_apply
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul 𝕜 𝕜'] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] : IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext fun x => smul_assoc a b (f x)⟩
#align schwartz_map.is_scalar_tower SchwartzMap.instIsScalarTower
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' F] : SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext fun x => smul_comm a b (f x)⟩
#align schwartz_map.smul_comm_class SchwartzMap.instSMulCommClass
theorem seminormAux_smul_le (k n : ℕ) (c : 𝕜) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
(c • f).seminormAux k n ≤ ‖c‖ * f.seminormAux k n := by
refine
(c • f).seminormAux_le_bound k n (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _))
fun x => (decay_smul_aux k n f c x).le.trans ?_
rw [mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (norm_nonneg _)
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_aux_smul_le SchwartzMap.seminormAux_smul_le
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun c f =>
{ toFun := c • (f : E → F)
smooth' := (f.smooth _).const_smul c
decay' := by
have : c • (f : E → F) = (c : ℝ) • f := by
ext x
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_apply]
exact nsmul_eq_smul_cast _ _ _
simp only [this]
exact ((c : ℝ) • f).decay' }⟩
#align schwartz_map.has_nsmul SchwartzMap.instNSMul
instance instZSMul : SMul ℤ 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun c f =>
{ toFun := c • (f : E → F)
smooth' := (f.smooth _).const_smul c
decay' := by
have : c • (f : E → F) = (c : ℝ) • f := by
ext x
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_apply]
exact zsmul_eq_smul_cast _ _ _
simp only [this]
exact ((c : ℝ) • f).decay' }⟩
#align schwartz_map.has_zsmul SchwartzMap.instZSMul
end SMul
section Zero
instance instZero : Zero 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
smooth' := contDiff_const
decay' := fun _ _ => ⟨1, fun _ => by simp⟩ }⟩
#align schwartz_map.has_zero SchwartzMap.instZero
instance instInhabited : Inhabited 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨0⟩
#align schwartz_map.inhabited SchwartzMap.instInhabited
theorem coe_zero : DFunLike.coe (0 : 𝓢(E, F)) = (0 : E → F) :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.coe_zero SchwartzMap.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : 𝓢(E, F)) = (0 : E → F) :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.coe_fn_zero SchwartzMap.coeFn_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : E} : (0 : 𝓢(E, F)) x = 0 :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.zero_apply SchwartzMap.zero_apply
theorem seminormAux_zero (k n : ℕ) : (0 : 𝓢(E, F)).seminormAux k n = 0 :=
le_antisymm (seminormAux_le_bound k n _ rfl.le fun _ => by simp [Pi.zero_def])
(seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _)
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_aux_zero SchwartzMap.seminormAux_zero
end Zero
section Neg
instance instNeg : Neg 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun f =>
⟨-f, (f.smooth _).neg, fun k n =>
⟨f.seminormAux k n, fun x => (decay_neg_aux k n f x).le.trans (f.le_seminormAux k n x)⟩⟩⟩
#align schwartz_map.has_neg SchwartzMap.instNeg
end Neg
section Add
instance instAdd : Add 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f + g, (f.smooth _).add (g.smooth _), fun k n =>
⟨f.seminormAux k n + g.seminormAux k n, fun x =>
(decay_add_le_aux k n f g x).trans
(add_le_add (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (g.le_seminormAux k n x))⟩⟩⟩
#align schwartz_map.has_add SchwartzMap.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : 𝓢(E, F)} {x : E} : (f + g) x = f x + g x :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.add_apply SchwartzMap.add_apply
theorem seminormAux_add_le (k n : ℕ) (f g : 𝓢(E, F)) :
(f + g).seminormAux k n ≤ f.seminormAux k n + g.seminormAux k n :=
(f + g).seminormAux_le_bound k n
(add_nonneg (seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _) (seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _)) fun x =>
(decay_add_le_aux k n f g x).trans <|
add_le_add (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (g.le_seminormAux k n x)
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_aux_add_le SchwartzMap.seminormAux_add_le
end Add
section Sub
instance instSub : Sub 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f - g, (f.smooth _).sub (g.smooth _), by
intro k n
refine ⟨f.seminormAux k n + g.seminormAux k n, fun x => ?_⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (g.le_seminormAux k n x))
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [← decay_neg_aux k n g x]
convert decay_add_le_aux k n f (-g) x⟩⟩
#align schwartz_map.has_sub SchwartzMap.instSub
-- exact fails with deterministic timeout
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply {f g : 𝓢(E, F)} {x : E} : (f - g) x = f x - g x :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.sub_apply SchwartzMap.sub_apply
end Sub
section AddCommGroup
instance instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup 𝓢(E, F) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align schwartz_map.add_comm_group SchwartzMap.instAddCommGroup
variable (E F)
/-- Coercion as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : 𝓢(E, F) →+ E → F where
toFun f := f
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' _ _ := rfl
#align schwartz_map.coe_hom SchwartzMap.coeHom
variable {E F}
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom E F : 𝓢(E, F) → E → F) = DFunLike.coe :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.coe_coe_hom SchwartzMap.coe_coeHom
theorem coeHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeHom E F) := by
rw [coe_coeHom]
exact DFunLike.coe_injective
#align schwartz_map.coe_hom_injective SchwartzMap.coeHom_injective
end AddCommGroup
section Module
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
instance instModule : Module 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) :=
coeHom_injective.module 𝕜 (coeHom E F) fun _ _ => rfl
#align schwartz_map.module SchwartzMap.instModule
end Module
section Seminorms
/-! ### Seminorms on Schwartz space-/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
variable (𝕜)
/-- The seminorms of the Schwartz space given by the best constants in the definition of
`𝓢(E, F)`. -/
protected def seminorm (k n : ℕ) : Seminorm 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) :=
Seminorm.ofSMulLE (SchwartzMap.seminormAux k n) (seminormAux_zero k n) (seminormAux_add_le k n)
(seminormAux_smul_le k n)
#align schwartz_map.seminorm SchwartzMap.seminorm
/-- If one controls the seminorm for every `x`, then one controls the seminorm. -/
theorem seminorm_le_bound (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M)
(hM : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ M) : SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f ≤ M :=
f.seminormAux_le_bound k n hMp hM
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_le_bound SchwartzMap.seminorm_le_bound
/-- If one controls the seminorm for every `x`, then one controls the seminorm.
Variant for functions `𝓢(ℝ, F)`. -/
theorem seminorm_le_bound' (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(ℝ, F)) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M)
(hM : ∀ x, |x| ^ k * ‖iteratedDeriv n f x‖ ≤ M) : SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f ≤ M := by
refine seminorm_le_bound 𝕜 k n f hMp ?_
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_iteratedFDeriv_eq_norm_iteratedDeriv]
#align schwartz_map.seminorm_le_bound' SchwartzMap.seminorm_le_bound'
/-- The seminorm controls the Schwartz estimate for any fixed `x`. -/
theorem le_seminorm (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f :=
f.le_seminormAux k n x
#align schwartz_map.le_seminorm SchwartzMap.le_seminorm
/-- The seminorm controls the Schwartz estimate for any fixed `x`.
Variant for functions `𝓢(ℝ, F)`. -/
theorem le_seminorm' (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(ℝ, F)) (x : ℝ) :
|x| ^ k * ‖iteratedDeriv n f x‖ ≤ SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f := by
have := le_seminorm 𝕜 k n f x
rwa [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← norm_iteratedFDeriv_eq_norm_iteratedDeriv]
#align schwartz_map.le_seminorm' SchwartzMap.le_seminorm'
theorem norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_seminorm (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (n : ℕ) (x₀ : E) :
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x₀‖ ≤ (SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 0 n) f := by
have := SchwartzMap.le_seminorm 𝕜 0 n f x₀
rwa [pow_zero, one_mul] at this
#align schwartz_map.norm_iterated_fderiv_le_seminorm SchwartzMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_seminorm
theorem norm_pow_mul_le_seminorm (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (k : ℕ) (x₀ : E) :
‖x₀‖ ^ k * ‖f x₀‖ ≤ (SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k 0) f := by
have := SchwartzMap.le_seminorm 𝕜 k 0 f x₀
rwa [norm_iteratedFDeriv_zero] at this
#align schwartz_map.norm_pow_mul_le_seminorm SchwartzMap.norm_pow_mul_le_seminorm
theorem norm_le_seminorm (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x₀ : E) : ‖f x₀‖ ≤ (SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 0 0) f := by
have := norm_pow_mul_le_seminorm 𝕜 f 0 x₀
rwa [pow_zero, one_mul] at this
#align schwartz_map.norm_le_seminorm SchwartzMap.norm_le_seminorm
variable (E F)
/-- The family of Schwartz seminorms. -/
def _root_.schwartzSeminormFamily : SeminormFamily 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) (ℕ × ℕ) :=
fun m => SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 m.1 m.2
#align schwartz_seminorm_family schwartzSeminormFamily
@[simp]
theorem schwartzSeminormFamily_apply (n k : ℕ) :
schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 E F (n, k) = SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 n k :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.schwartz_seminorm_family_apply SchwartzMap.schwartzSeminormFamily_apply
@[simp]
theorem schwartzSeminormFamily_apply_zero :
schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 E F 0 = SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 0 0 :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.schwartz_seminorm_family_apply_zero SchwartzMap.schwartzSeminormFamily_apply_zero
variable {𝕜 E F}
/-- A more convenient version of `le_sup_seminorm_apply`.
The set `Finset.Iic m` is the set of all pairs `(k', n')` with `k' ≤ m.1` and `n' ≤ m.2`.
Note that the constant is far from optimal. -/
theorem one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply {m : ℕ × ℕ} {k n : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ m.1) (hn : n ≤ m.2)
(f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
(1 + ‖x‖) ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤
2 ^ m.1 * (Finset.Iic m).sup (fun m => SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 m.1 m.2) f := by
rw [add_comm, add_pow]
simp only [one_pow, mul_one, Finset.sum_congr, Finset.sum_mul]
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.sum_range_choose m.1]
push_cast
rw [Finset.sum_mul]
have hk' : Finset.range (k + 1) ⊆ Finset.range (m.1 + 1) := by
rwa [Finset.range_subset, add_le_add_iff_right]
refine le_trans (Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg hk' fun _ _ _ => by positivity) ?_
gcongr ∑ _i ∈ Finset.range (m.1 + 1), ?_ with i hi
move_mul [(Nat.choose k i : ℝ), (Nat.choose m.1 i : ℝ)]
gcongr
· apply (le_seminorm 𝕜 i n f x).trans
apply Seminorm.le_def.1
exact Finset.le_sup_of_le (Finset.mem_Iic.2 <|
Prod.mk_le_mk.2 ⟨Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hi, hn⟩) le_rfl
· exact mod_cast Nat.choose_le_choose i hk
#align schwartz_map.one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply SchwartzMap.one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply
end Seminorms
section Topology
/-! ### The topology on the Schwartz space-/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
variable (𝕜 E F)
instance instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace 𝓢(E, F) :=
(schwartzSeminormFamily ℝ E F).moduleFilterBasis.topology'
#align schwartz_map.topological_space SchwartzMap.instTopologicalSpace
theorem _root_.schwartz_withSeminorms : WithSeminorms (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 E F) := by
have A : WithSeminorms (schwartzSeminormFamily ℝ E F) := ⟨rfl⟩
rw [SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf] at A ⊢
rw [A]
rfl
#align schwartz_with_seminorms schwartz_withSeminorms
variable {𝕜 E F}
instance instContinuousSMul : ContinuousSMul 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) := by
rw [(schwartz_withSeminorms 𝕜 E F).withSeminorms_eq]
exact (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 E F).moduleFilterBasis.continuousSMul
#align schwartz_map.has_continuous_smul SchwartzMap.instContinuousSMul
instance instTopologicalAddGroup : TopologicalAddGroup 𝓢(E, F) :=
(schwartzSeminormFamily ℝ E F).addGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup
#align schwartz_map.topological_add_group SchwartzMap.instTopologicalAddGroup
instance instUniformSpace : UniformSpace 𝓢(E, F) :=
(schwartzSeminormFamily ℝ E F).addGroupFilterBasis.uniformSpace
#align schwartz_map.uniform_space SchwartzMap.instUniformSpace
instance instUniformAddGroup : UniformAddGroup 𝓢(E, F) :=
(schwartzSeminormFamily ℝ E F).addGroupFilterBasis.uniformAddGroup
#align schwartz_map.uniform_add_group SchwartzMap.instUniformAddGroup
instance instLocallyConvexSpace : LocallyConvexSpace ℝ 𝓢(E, F) :=
(schwartz_withSeminorms ℝ E F).toLocallyConvexSpace
#align schwartz_map.locally_convex_space SchwartzMap.instLocallyConvexSpace
instance instFirstCountableTopology : FirstCountableTopology 𝓢(E, F) :=
(schwartz_withSeminorms ℝ E F).first_countable
#align schwartz_map.topological_space.first_countable_topology SchwartzMap.instFirstCountableTopology
end Topology
section TemperateGrowth
/-! ### Functions of temperate growth -/
/-- A function is called of temperate growth if it is smooth and all iterated derivatives are
polynomially bounded. -/
def _root_.Function.HasTemperateGrowth (f : E → F) : Prop :=
ContDiff ℝ ⊤ f ∧ ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ (k : ℕ) (C : ℝ), ∀ x, ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ C * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ k
#align function.has_temperate_growth Function.HasTemperateGrowth
theorem _root_.Function.HasTemperateGrowth.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_uniform_aux {f : E → F}
(hf_temperate : f.HasTemperateGrowth) (n : ℕ) :
∃ (k : ℕ) (C : ℝ), 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ N ≤ n, ∀ x : E, ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ N f x‖ ≤ C * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ k := by
choose k C f using hf_temperate.2
use (Finset.range (n + 1)).sup k
let C' := max (0 : ℝ) ((Finset.range (n + 1)).sup' (by simp) C)
have hC' : 0 ≤ C' := by simp only [C', le_refl, Finset.le_sup'_iff, true_or_iff, le_max_iff]
use C', hC'
intro N hN x
rw [← Finset.mem_range_succ_iff] at hN
refine le_trans (f N x) (mul_le_mul ?_ ?_ (by positivity) hC')
· simp only [C', Finset.le_sup'_iff, le_max_iff]
right
exact ⟨N, hN, rfl.le⟩
gcongr
· simp
exact Finset.le_sup hN
#align function.has_temperate_growth.norm_iterated_fderiv_le_uniform_aux Function.HasTemperateGrowth.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_uniform_aux
lemma _root_.Function.HasTemperateGrowth.of_fderiv {f : E → F}
(h'f : Function.HasTemperateGrowth (fderiv ℝ f)) (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) {k : ℕ} {C : ℝ}
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ k) :
Function.HasTemperateGrowth f := by
refine ⟨contDiff_top_iff_fderiv.2 ⟨hf, h'f.1⟩ , fun n ↦ ?_⟩
rcases n with rfl|m
· exact ⟨k, C, fun x ↦ by simpa using h x⟩
· rcases h'f.2 m with ⟨k', C', h'⟩
refine ⟨k', C', ?_⟩
simpa [iteratedFDeriv_succ_eq_comp_right] using h'
lemma _root_.Function.HasTemperateGrowth.zero :
Function.HasTemperateGrowth (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) := by
refine ⟨contDiff_const, fun n ↦ ⟨0, 0, fun x ↦ ?_⟩⟩
simp only [iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun, Pi.zero_apply, norm_zero, forall_const]
positivity
lemma _root_.Function.HasTemperateGrowth.const (c : F) :
Function.HasTemperateGrowth (fun _ : E ↦ c) :=
.of_fderiv (by simpa using .zero) (differentiable_const c) (k := 0) (C := ‖c‖) (fun x ↦ by simp)
lemma _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.hasTemperateGrowth (f : E →L[ℝ] F) :
Function.HasTemperateGrowth f := by
apply Function.HasTemperateGrowth.of_fderiv ?_ f.differentiable (k := 1) (C := ‖f‖) (fun x ↦ ?_)
· have : fderiv ℝ f = fun _ ↦ f := by ext1 v; simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.fderiv]
simpa [this] using .const _
· exact (f.le_opNorm x).trans (by simp [mul_add])
variable [NormedAddCommGroup D] [NormedSpace ℝ D]
variable [MeasurableSpace D] [BorelSpace D] [SecondCountableTopology D] [FiniteDimensional ℝ D]
open MeasureTheory FiniteDimensional
/-- A measure `μ` has temperate growth if there is an `n : ℕ` such that `(1 + ‖x‖) ^ (- n)` is
`μ`-integrable. -/
class _root_.MeasureTheory.Measure.HasTemperateGrowth (μ : Measure D) : Prop :=
exists_integrable : ∃ (n : ℕ), Integrable (fun x ↦ (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (- (n : ℝ))) μ
open Classical in
/-- An integer exponent `l` such that `(1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-l)` is integrable if `μ` has
temperate growth. -/
def _root_.MeasureTheory.Measure.integrablePower (μ : Measure D) : ℕ :=
if h : μ.HasTemperateGrowth then h.exists_integrable.choose else 0
lemma integrable_pow_neg_integrablePower
(μ : Measure D) [h : μ.HasTemperateGrowth] :
Integrable (fun x ↦ (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (- (μ.integrablePower : ℝ))) μ := by
simp [Measure.integrablePower, h]
exact h.exists_integrable.choose_spec
instance _root_.MeasureTheory.Measure.IsFiniteMeasure.instHasTemperateGrowth {μ : Measure D}
[h : IsFiniteMeasure μ] : μ.HasTemperateGrowth := ⟨⟨0, by simp⟩⟩
instance _root_.MeasureTheory.Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure.instHasTemperateGrowth {μ : Measure D}
[h : μ.IsAddHaarMeasure] : μ.HasTemperateGrowth :=
⟨⟨finrank ℝ D + 1, by apply integrable_one_add_norm; norm_num⟩⟩
/-- Pointwise inequality to control `x ^ k * f` in terms of `1 / (1 + x) ^ l` if one controls both
`f` (with a bound `C₁`) and `x ^ (k + l) * f` (with a bound `C₂`). This will be used to check
integrability of `x ^ k * f x` when `f` is a Schwartz function, and to control explicitly its
integral in terms of suitable seminorms of `f`. -/
lemma pow_mul_le_of_le_of_pow_mul_le {C₁ C₂ : ℝ} {k l : ℕ} {x f : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hf : 0 ≤ f)
(h₁ : f ≤ C₁) (h₂ : x ^ (k + l) * f ≤ C₂) :
x ^ k * f ≤ 2 ^ l * (C₁ + C₂) * (1 + x) ^ (- (l : ℝ)) := by
have : 0 ≤ C₂ := le_trans (by positivity) h₂
have : 2 ^ l * (C₁ + C₂) * (1 + x) ^ (- (l : ℝ)) = ((1 + x) / 2) ^ (-(l:ℝ)) * (C₁ + C₂) := by
rw [Real.div_rpow (by linarith) zero_le_two]
simp [div_eq_inv_mul, ← Real.rpow_neg_one, ← Real.rpow_mul]
ring
rw [this]
rcases le_total x 1 with h'x|h'x
· gcongr
· apply (pow_le_one k hx h'x).trans
apply Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos
· linarith
· linarith
· simp
· linarith
· calc
x ^ k * f = x ^ (-(l:ℝ)) * (x ^ (k + l) * f) := by
rw [← Real.rpow_natCast, ← Real.rpow_natCast, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.rpow_add (by linarith)]
simp
_ ≤ ((1 + x) / 2) ^ (-(l:ℝ)) * (C₁ + C₂) := by
apply mul_le_mul _ _ (by positivity) (by positivity)
· exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (by linarith) (by linarith) (by simp)
· exact h₂.trans (by linarith)
/-- Given a function such that `f` and `x ^ (k + l) * f` are bounded for a suitable `l`, then
`x ^ k * f` is integrable. The bounds are not relevant for the integrability conclusion, but they
are relevant for bounding the integral in `integral_pow_mul_le_of_le_of_pow_mul_le`. We formulate
the two lemmas with the same set of assumptions for ease of applications. -/
lemma integrable_of_le_of_pow_mul_le
{μ : Measure D} [μ.HasTemperateGrowth] {f : D → E} {C₁ C₂ : ℝ} {k : ℕ}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C₁) (h'f : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ (k + μ.integrablePower) * ‖f x‖ ≤ C₂)
(h''f : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖f x‖) μ := by
apply ((integrable_pow_neg_integrablePower μ).const_mul (2 ^ μ.integrablePower * (C₁ + C₂))).mono'
· exact AEStronglyMeasurable.mul (aestronglyMeasurable_id.norm.pow _) h''f.norm
· filter_upwards with v
simp only [norm_mul, norm_pow, norm_norm]
apply pow_mul_le_of_le_of_pow_mul_le (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _) (hf v) (h'f v)
/-- Given a function such that `f` and `x ^ (k + l) * f` are bounded for a suitable `l`, then
one can bound explicitly the integral of `x ^ k * f`. -/
lemma integral_pow_mul_le_of_le_of_pow_mul_le
{μ : Measure D} [μ.HasTemperateGrowth] {f : D → E} {C₁ C₂ : ℝ} {k : ℕ}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C₁) (h'f : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ (k + μ.integrablePower) * ‖f x‖ ≤ C₂) :
∫ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖f x‖ ∂μ ≤ 2 ^ μ.integrablePower *
(∫ x, (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (- (μ.integrablePower : ℝ)) ∂μ) * (C₁ + C₂) := by
rw [← integral_mul_left, ← integral_mul_right]
apply integral_mono_of_nonneg
· filter_upwards with v using by positivity
· exact ((integrable_pow_neg_integrablePower μ).const_mul _).mul_const _
filter_upwards with v
exact (pow_mul_le_of_le_of_pow_mul_le (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _) (hf v) (h'f v)).trans
(le_of_eq (by ring))
end TemperateGrowth
section CLM
/-! ### Construction of continuous linear maps between Schwartz spaces -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedField 𝕜']
variable [NormedAddCommGroup D] [NormedSpace ℝ D]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G] [NormedSpace 𝕜' G] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜' G]
variable {σ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜'}
/-- Create a semilinear map between Schwartz spaces.
Note: This is a helper definition for `mkCLM`. -/
def mkLM (A : (D → E) → F → G) (hadd : ∀ (f g : 𝓢(D, E)) (x), A (f + g) x = A f x + A g x)
(hsmul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (f : 𝓢(D, E)) (x), A (a • f) x = σ a • A f x)
(hsmooth : ∀ f : 𝓢(D, E), ContDiff ℝ ⊤ (A f))
(hbound : ∀ n : ℕ × ℕ, ∃ (s : Finset (ℕ × ℕ)) (C : ℝ), 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (f : 𝓢(D, E)) (x : F),
‖x‖ ^ n.fst * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n.snd (A f) x‖ ≤ C * s.sup (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 D E) f) :
𝓢(D, E) →ₛₗ[σ] 𝓢(F, G) where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := A f
smooth' := hsmooth f
decay' := by
intro k n
rcases hbound ⟨k, n⟩ with ⟨s, C, _, h⟩
exact ⟨C * (s.sup (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 D E)) f, h f⟩ }
map_add' f g := ext (hadd f g)
map_smul' a f := ext (hsmul a f)
#align schwartz_map.mk_lm SchwartzMap.mkLM
/-- Create a continuous semilinear map between Schwartz spaces.
For an example of using this definition, see `fderivCLM`. -/
def mkCLM [RingHomIsometric σ] (A : (D → E) → F → G)
(hadd : ∀ (f g : 𝓢(D, E)) (x), A (f + g) x = A f x + A g x)
(hsmul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (f : 𝓢(D, E)) (x), A (a • f) x = σ a • A f x)
(hsmooth : ∀ f : 𝓢(D, E), ContDiff ℝ ⊤ (A f))
(hbound : ∀ n : ℕ × ℕ, ∃ (s : Finset (ℕ × ℕ)) (C : ℝ), 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (f : 𝓢(D, E)) (x : F),
‖x‖ ^ n.fst * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n.snd (A f) x‖ ≤ C * s.sup (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 D E) f) :
𝓢(D, E) →SL[σ] 𝓢(F, G) where
cont := by
change Continuous (mkLM A hadd hsmul hsmooth hbound : 𝓢(D, E) →ₛₗ[σ] 𝓢(F, G))
refine
Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded (schwartz_withSeminorms 𝕜 D E)
(schwartz_withSeminorms 𝕜' F G) _ fun n => ?_
rcases hbound n with ⟨s, C, hC, h⟩
refine ⟨s, ⟨C, hC⟩, fun f => ?_⟩
exact (mkLM A hadd hsmul hsmooth hbound f).seminorm_le_bound 𝕜' n.1 n.2 (by positivity) (h f)
toLinearMap := mkLM A hadd hsmul hsmooth hbound
#align schwartz_map.mk_clm SchwartzMap.mkCLM
/-- Define a continuous semilinear map from Schwartz space to a normed space. -/
def mkCLMtoNormedSpace [RingHomIsometric σ] (A : 𝓢(D, E) → G)
(hadd : ∀ (f g : 𝓢(D, E)), A (f + g) = A f + A g)
(hsmul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (f : 𝓢(D, E)), A (a • f) = σ a • A f)
(hbound : ∃ (s : Finset (ℕ × ℕ)) (C : ℝ), 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (f : 𝓢(D, E)),
‖A f‖ ≤ C * s.sup (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 D E) f) :
𝓢(D, E) →SL[σ] G where
toLinearMap :=
{ toFun := (A ·)
map_add' := hadd
map_smul' := hsmul }
cont := by
change Continuous (LinearMap.mk _ _)
apply Seminorm.cont_withSeminorms_normedSpace G (schwartz_withSeminorms 𝕜 D E)
rcases hbound with ⟨s, C, hC, h⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨C, hC⟩, h⟩
end CLM
section EvalCLM
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
/-- The map applying a vector to Hom-valued Schwartz function as a continuous linear map. -/
protected def evalCLM (m : E) : 𝓢(E, E →L[ℝ] F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(E, F) :=
mkCLM (fun f x => f x m) (fun _ _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
(fun f => ContDiff.clm_apply f.2 contDiff_const)
(by
rintro ⟨k, n⟩
use {(k, n)}, ‖m‖, norm_nonneg _
intro f x
refine
le_trans
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_iteratedFDeriv_clm_apply_const f.2 le_top)
(by positivity))
?_
move_mul [‖m‖]
gcongr ?_ * ‖m‖
simp only [Finset.sup_singleton, schwartzSeminormFamily_apply, le_seminorm])
#align schwartz_map.eval_clm SchwartzMap.evalCLM
end EvalCLM
section Multiplication
variable [NormedAddCommGroup D] [NormedSpace ℝ D]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
/-- The map `f ↦ (x ↦ B (f x) (g x))` as a continuous `𝕜`-linear map on Schwartz space,
where `B` is a continuous `𝕜`-linear map and `g` is a function of temperate growth. -/
def bilinLeftCLM (B : E →L[ℝ] F →L[ℝ] G) {g : D → F} (hg : g.HasTemperateGrowth) :
𝓢(D, E) →L[ℝ] 𝓢(D, G) :=
-- Todo (after port): generalize to `B : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G` and `𝕜`-linear
mkCLM
(fun f x => B (f x) (g x))
(fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [map_add, add_left_inj, Pi.add_apply, eq_self_iff_true,
ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply])
(fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [smul_apply, map_smul, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', Pi.smul_apply,
RingHom.id_apply])
(fun f => (B.isBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff.restrict_scalars ℝ).comp (f.smooth'.prod hg.1))
(by
rintro ⟨k, n⟩
rcases hg.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_uniform_aux n with ⟨l, C, hC, hgrowth⟩
use
Finset.Iic (l + k, n), ‖B‖ * ((n : ℝ) + (1 : ℝ)) * n.choose (n / 2) * (C * 2 ^ (l + k)),
by positivity
intro f x
have hxk : 0 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ k := by positivity
have hnorm_mul :=
ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_of_bilinear B f.smooth' hg.1 x (n := n) le_top
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hnorm_mul hxk) ?_
move_mul [← ‖B‖]
simp_rw [mul_assoc ‖B‖]
gcongr _ * ?_
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
have : (∑ _x ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (1 : ℝ)) = n + 1 := by simp
simp_rw [mul_assoc ((n : ℝ) + 1)]
rw [← this, Finset.sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_le_sum fun i hi => ?_
simp only [one_mul]
move_mul [(Nat.choose n i : ℝ), (Nat.choose n (n / 2) : ℝ)]
gcongr ?_ * ?_
swap
· norm_cast
exact i.choose_le_middle n
specialize hgrowth (n - i) (by simp only [tsub_le_self]) x
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hgrowth (by positivity)) ?_
move_mul [C]
gcongr ?_ * C
rw [Finset.mem_range_succ_iff] at hi
change i ≤ (l + k, n).snd at hi
refine le_trans ?_ (one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply le_rfl hi f x)
rw [pow_add]
move_mul [(1 + ‖x‖) ^ l]
gcongr
simp)
#align schwartz_map.bilin_left_clm SchwartzMap.bilinLeftCLM
end Multiplication
section Comp
variable (𝕜)
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup D] [NormedSpace ℝ D]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 G]
/-- Composition with a function on the right is a continuous linear map on Schwartz space
provided that the function is temperate and growths polynomially near infinity. -/
def compCLM {g : D → E} (hg : g.HasTemperateGrowth)
(hg_upper : ∃ (k : ℕ) (C : ℝ), ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ C * (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k) : 𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(D, F) :=
mkCLM (fun f x => f (g x))
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [add_left_inj, Pi.add_apply, eq_self_iff_true]) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
(fun f => f.smooth'.comp hg.1)
(by
rintro ⟨k, n⟩
rcases hg.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_uniform_aux n with ⟨l, C, hC, hgrowth⟩
rcases hg_upper with ⟨kg, Cg, hg_upper'⟩
have hCg : 1 ≤ 1 + Cg := by
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
specialize hg_upper' 0
rw [norm_zero] at hg_upper'
exact nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left hg_upper' (by positivity)
let k' := kg * (k + l * n)
use Finset.Iic (k', n), (1 + Cg) ^ (k + l * n) * ((C + 1) ^ n * n ! * 2 ^ k'), by positivity
intro f x
let seminorm_f := ((Finset.Iic (k', n)).sup (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 _ _)) f
have hg_upper'' : (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (k + l * n) ≤ (1 + Cg) ^ (k + l * n) * (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k' := by
rw [pow_mul, ← mul_pow]
gcongr
rw [add_mul]
refine add_le_add ?_ (hg_upper' x)
nth_rw 1 [← one_mul (1 : ℝ)]
gcongr
apply one_le_pow_of_one_le
simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, norm_nonneg]
have hbound :
∀ i, i ≤ n → ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ i f (g x)‖ ≤ 2 ^ k' * seminorm_f / (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k' := by
intro i hi
have hpos : 0 < (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k' := by positivity
rw [le_div_iff' hpos]
change i ≤ (k', n).snd at hi
exact one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply le_rfl hi _ _
have hgrowth' : ∀ N : ℕ, 1 ≤ N → N ≤ n →
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ N g x‖ ≤ ((C + 1) * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ l) ^ N := by
intro N hN₁ hN₂
refine (hgrowth N hN₂ x).trans ?_
rw [mul_pow]
have hN₁' := (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hN₁).ne'
gcongr
· exact le_trans (by simp [hC]) (le_self_pow (by simp [hC]) hN₁')
· refine le_self_pow (one_le_pow_of_one_le ?_ l) hN₁'
simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, norm_nonneg]
have := norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_le f.smooth' hg.1 le_top x hbound hgrowth'
have hxk : ‖x‖ ^ k ≤ (1 + ‖x‖) ^ k :=
pow_le_pow_left (norm_nonneg _) (by simp only [zero_le_one, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]) _
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul hxk this (by positivity) (by positivity)) ?_
have rearrange :
(1 + ‖x‖) ^ k *
(n ! * (2 ^ k' * seminorm_f / (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k') * ((C + 1) * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ l) ^ n) =
(1 + ‖x‖) ^ (k + l * n) / (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k' *
((C + 1) ^ n * n ! * 2 ^ k' * seminorm_f) := by
rw [mul_pow, pow_add, ← pow_mul]
ring
rw [rearrange]
have hgxk' : 0 < (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k' := by positivity
rw [← div_le_iff hgxk'] at hg_upper''
have hpos : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (C + 1) ^ n * n ! * 2 ^ k' * seminorm_f := by
have : 0 ≤ seminorm_f := apply_nonneg _ _
positivity
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hg_upper'' hpos) ?_
rw [← mul_assoc])
#align schwartz_map.comp_clm SchwartzMap.compCLM
@[simp] lemma compCLM_apply {g : D → E} (hg : g.HasTemperateGrowth)
(hg_upper : ∃ (k : ℕ) (C : ℝ), ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ C * (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ k) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
compCLM 𝕜 hg hg_upper f = f ∘ g := rfl
/-- Composition with a function on the right is a continuous linear map on Schwartz space
provided that the function is temperate and antilipschitz. -/
def compCLMOfAntilipschitz {K : ℝ≥0} {g : D → E}
(hg : g.HasTemperateGrowth) (h'g : AntilipschitzWith K g) :
𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(D, F) := by
refine compCLM 𝕜 hg ⟨1, K * max 1 ‖g 0‖, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
calc
‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖g x - g 0‖ := by
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_eq_norm]
apply h'g.le_mul_dist
_ ≤ K * (‖g x‖ + ‖g 0‖) := by
gcongr
exact norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ K * (‖g x‖ + max 1 ‖g 0‖) := by
gcongr
exact le_max_right _ _
_ ≤ (K * max 1 ‖g 0‖ : ℝ) * (1 + ‖g x‖) ^ 1 := by
simp only [mul_add, add_comm (K * ‖g x‖), pow_one, mul_one, add_le_add_iff_left]
gcongr
exact le_mul_of_one_le_right (by positivity) (le_max_left _ _)
@[simp] lemma compCLMOfAntilipschitz_apply {K : ℝ≥0} {g : D → E} (hg : g.HasTemperateGrowth)
(h'g : AntilipschitzWith K g) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
compCLMOfAntilipschitz 𝕜 hg h'g f = f ∘ g := rfl
/-- Composition with a continuous linear equiv on the right is a continuous linear map on
Schwartz space. -/
def compCLMOfContinuousLinearEquiv (g : D ≃L[ℝ] E) :
𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(D, F) :=
compCLMOfAntilipschitz 𝕜 (g.toContinuousLinearMap.hasTemperateGrowth) g.antilipschitz
@[simp] lemma compCLMOfContinuousLinearEquiv_apply (g : D ≃L[ℝ] E) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
compCLMOfContinuousLinearEquiv 𝕜 g f = f ∘ g := rfl
end Comp
section Derivatives
/-! ### Derivatives of Schwartz functions -/
variable (𝕜)
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
/-- The Fréchet derivative on Schwartz space as a continuous `𝕜`-linear map. -/
def fderivCLM : 𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(E, E →L[ℝ] F) :=
mkCLM (fderiv ℝ) (fun f g _ => fderiv_add f.differentiableAt g.differentiableAt)
(fun a f _ => fderiv_const_smul f.differentiableAt a)
(fun f => (contDiff_top_iff_fderiv.mp f.smooth').2) fun ⟨k, n⟩ =>
⟨{⟨k, n + 1⟩}, 1, zero_le_one, fun f x => by
simpa only [schwartzSeminormFamily_apply, Seminorm.comp_apply, Finset.sup_singleton,
one_smul, norm_iteratedFDeriv_fderiv, one_mul] using f.le_seminorm 𝕜 k (n + 1) x⟩
#align schwartz_map.fderiv_clm SchwartzMap.fderivCLM
@[simp]
theorem fderivCLM_apply (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) : fderivCLM 𝕜 f x = fderiv ℝ f x :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.fderiv_clm_apply SchwartzMap.fderivCLM_apply
/-- The 1-dimensional derivative on Schwartz space as a continuous `𝕜`-linear map. -/
def derivCLM : 𝓢(ℝ, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(ℝ, F) :=
mkCLM (fun f => deriv f) (fun f g _ => deriv_add f.differentiableAt g.differentiableAt)
(fun a f _ => deriv_const_smul a f.differentiableAt)
(fun f => (contDiff_top_iff_deriv.mp f.smooth').2) fun ⟨k, n⟩ =>
⟨{⟨k, n + 1⟩}, 1, zero_le_one, fun f x => by
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, Finset.sup_singleton, schwartzSeminormFamily_apply, one_mul,
norm_iteratedFDeriv_eq_norm_iteratedDeriv, ← iteratedDeriv_succ'] using
f.le_seminorm' 𝕜 k (n + 1) x⟩
#align schwartz_map.deriv_clm SchwartzMap.derivCLM
@[simp]
theorem derivCLM_apply (f : 𝓢(ℝ, F)) (x : ℝ) : derivCLM 𝕜 f x = deriv f x :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.deriv_clm_apply SchwartzMap.derivCLM_apply
/-- The partial derivative (or directional derivative) in the direction `m : E` as a
continuous linear map on Schwartz space. -/
def pderivCLM (m : E) : 𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(E, F) :=
(SchwartzMap.evalCLM m).comp (fderivCLM 𝕜)
#align schwartz_map.pderiv_clm SchwartzMap.pderivCLM
@[simp]
theorem pderivCLM_apply (m : E) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) : pderivCLM 𝕜 m f x = fderiv ℝ f x m :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.pderiv_clm_apply SchwartzMap.pderivCLM_apply
theorem pderivCLM_eq_lineDeriv (m : E) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
pderivCLM 𝕜 m f x = lineDeriv ℝ f x m := by
simp only [pderivCLM_apply, f.differentiableAt.lineDeriv_eq_fderiv]
/-- The iterated partial derivative (or directional derivative) as a continuous linear map on
Schwartz space. -/
def iteratedPDeriv {n : ℕ} : (Fin n → E) → 𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(E, F) :=
Nat.recOn n (fun _ => ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 _) fun _ rec x =>
(pderivCLM 𝕜 (x 0)).comp (rec (Fin.tail x))
#align schwartz_map.iterated_pderiv SchwartzMap.iteratedPDeriv
@[simp]
theorem iteratedPDeriv_zero (m : Fin 0 → E) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 m f = f :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.iterated_pderiv_zero SchwartzMap.iteratedPDeriv_zero
@[simp]
theorem iteratedPDeriv_one (m : Fin 1 → E) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 m f = pderivCLM 𝕜 (m 0) f :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.iterated_pderiv_one SchwartzMap.iteratedPDeriv_one
theorem iteratedPDeriv_succ_left {n : ℕ} (m : Fin (n + 1) → E) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 m f = pderivCLM 𝕜 (m 0) (iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 (Fin.tail m) f) :=
rfl
#align schwartz_map.iterated_pderiv_succ_left SchwartzMap.iteratedPDeriv_succ_left
| Mathlib/Analysis/Distribution/SchwartzSpace.lean | 1,098 | 1,113 | theorem iteratedPDeriv_succ_right {n : ℕ} (m : Fin (n + 1) → E) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 m f = iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 (Fin.init m) (pderivCLM 𝕜 (m (Fin.last n)) f) := by |
induction' n with n IH
· rw [iteratedPDeriv_zero, iteratedPDeriv_one]
rfl
-- The proof is `∂^{n + 2} = ∂ ∂^{n + 1} = ∂ ∂^n ∂ = ∂^{n+1} ∂`
have hmzero : Fin.init m 0 = m 0 := by simp only [Fin.init_def, Fin.castSucc_zero]
have hmtail : Fin.tail m (Fin.last n) = m (Fin.last n.succ) := by
simp only [Fin.tail_def, Fin.succ_last]
calc
_ = pderivCLM 𝕜 (m 0) (iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 _ f) := iteratedPDeriv_succ_left _ _ _
_ = pderivCLM 𝕜 (m 0) ((iteratedPDeriv 𝕜 _) ((pderivCLM 𝕜 _) f)) := by
congr 1
exact IH _
_ = _ := by
simp only [hmtail, iteratedPDeriv_succ_left, hmzero, Fin.tail_init_eq_init_tail]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Division
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"72c366d0475675f1309d3027d3d7d47ee4423951"
/-!
# Division of `MvPolynomial` by monomials
## Main definitions
* `MvPolynomial.divMonomial x s`: divides `x` by the monomial `MvPolynomial.monomial 1 s`
* `MvPolynomial.modMonomial x s`: the remainder upon dividing `x` by the monomial
`MvPolynomial.monomial 1 s`.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.divMonomial_add_modMonomial`, `MvPolynomial.modMonomial_add_divMonomial`:
`divMonomial` and `modMonomial` are well-behaved as quotient and remainder operators.
## Implementation notes
Where possible, the results in this file should be first proved in the generality of
`AddMonoidAlgebra`, and then the versions specialized to `MvPolynomial` proved in terms of these.
-/
variable {σ R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
namespace MvPolynomial
section CopiedDeclarations
/-! Please ensure the declarations in this section are direct translations of `AddMonoidAlgebra`
results. -/
/-- Divide by `monomial 1 s`, discarding terms not divisible by this. -/
noncomputable def divMonomial (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf p s
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial MvPolynomial.divMonomial
local infixl:70 " /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => divMonomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_divMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s' : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff s' (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = coeff (s + s') x :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_div_monomial MvPolynomial.coeff_divMonomial
@[simp]
theorem support_divMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s).support = x.support.preimage _ (add_right_injective s).injOn :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.support_div_monomial MvPolynomial.support_divMonomial
@[simp]
theorem zero_divMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.zero_divOf _
#align mv_polynomial.zero_div_monomial MvPolynomial.zero_divMonomial
theorem divMonomial_zero (x : MvPolynomial σ R) : x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ 0 = x :=
x.divOf_zero
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial_zero MvPolynomial.divMonomial_zero
theorem add_divMonomial (x y : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(x + y) /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s + y /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s :=
map_add (N := _ →₀ _) _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.add_div_monomial MvPolynomial.add_divMonomial
theorem divMonomial_add (a b : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ (a + b) = x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ b :=
x.divOf_add _ _
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial_add MvPolynomial.divMonomial_add
@[simp]
theorem divMonomial_monomial_mul (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
monomial a 1 * x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a = x :=
x.of'_mul_divOf _
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial_monomial_mul MvPolynomial.divMonomial_monomial_mul
@[simp]
theorem divMonomial_mul_monomial (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
x * monomial a 1 /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a = x :=
x.mul_of'_divOf _
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial_mul_monomial MvPolynomial.divMonomial_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem divMonomial_monomial (a : σ →₀ ℕ) : monomial a 1 /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_divOf _
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial_monomial MvPolynomial.divMonomial_monomial
/-- The remainder upon division by `monomial 1 s`. -/
noncomputable def modMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
x.modOf s
#align mv_polynomial.mod_monomial MvPolynomial.modMonomial
local infixl:70 " %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_modMonomial_of_not_le {s' s : σ →₀ ℕ} (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (h : ¬s ≤ s') :
coeff s' (x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = coeff s' x :=
x.modOf_apply_of_not_exists_add s s'
(by
rintro ⟨d, rfl⟩
exact h le_self_add)
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_mod_monomial_of_not_le MvPolynomial.coeff_modMonomial_of_not_le
@[simp]
theorem coeff_modMonomial_of_le {s' s : σ →₀ ℕ} (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (h : s ≤ s') :
coeff s' (x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = 0 :=
x.modOf_apply_of_exists_add _ _ <| exists_add_of_le h
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_mod_monomial_of_le MvPolynomial.coeff_modMonomial_of_le
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_modMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
monomial s 1 * x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
x.of'_mul_modOf _
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_mul_mod_monomial MvPolynomial.monomial_mul_modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem mul_monomial_modMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
x * monomial s 1 %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
x.mul_of'_modOf _
#align mv_polynomial.mul_monomial_mod_monomial MvPolynomial.mul_monomial_modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem monomial_modMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : monomial s (1 : R) %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_modOf _
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_mod_monomial MvPolynomial.monomial_modMonomial
theorem divMonomial_add_modMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) :
monomial s 1 * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) + x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = x :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf_add_modOf x s
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial_add_mod_monomial MvPolynomial.divMonomial_add_modMonomial
theorem modMonomial_add_divMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) :
x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s + monomial s 1 * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = x :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.modOf_add_divOf x s
#align mv_polynomial.mod_monomial_add_div_monomial MvPolynomial.modMonomial_add_divMonomial
theorem monomial_one_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : MvPolynomial σ R} :
monomial i (1 : R) ∣ x ↔ x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ i = 0 :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_dvd_iff_modOf_eq_zero
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_one_dvd_iff_mod_monomial_eq_zero MvPolynomial.monomial_one_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero
end CopiedDeclarations
section XLemmas
local infixl:70 " /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => divMonomial
local infixl:70 " %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_divMonomial (i : σ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
X i * x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = x :=
divMonomial_monomial_mul _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.X_mul_div_monomial MvPolynomial.X_mul_divMonomial
@[simp]
theorem X_divMonomial (i : σ) : (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 1 :=
divMonomial_monomial (Finsupp.single i 1)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.X_div_monomial MvPolynomial.X_divMonomial
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_divMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
x * X i /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = x :=
divMonomial_mul_monomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.mul_X_div_monomial MvPolynomial.mul_X_divMonomial
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_modMonomial (i : σ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
X i * x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
monomial_mul_modMonomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.X_mul_mod_monomial MvPolynomial.X_mul_modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_modMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
x * X i %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
mul_monomial_modMonomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.mul_X_mod_monomial MvPolynomial.mul_X_modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem modMonomial_X (i : σ) : (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
monomial_modMonomial _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.mod_monomial_X MvPolynomial.modMonomial_X
theorem divMonomial_add_modMonomial_single (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
X i * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1) + x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = x :=
divMonomial_add_modMonomial _ _
#align mv_polynomial.div_monomial_add_mod_monomial_single MvPolynomial.divMonomial_add_modMonomial_single
theorem modMonomial_add_divMonomial_single (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 + X i * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1) = x :=
modMonomial_add_divMonomial _ _
#align mv_polynomial.mod_monomial_add_div_monomial_single MvPolynomial.modMonomial_add_divMonomial_single
theorem X_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero {i : σ} {x : MvPolynomial σ R} :
X i ∣ x ↔ x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
monomial_one_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.X_dvd_iff_mod_monomial_eq_zero MvPolynomial.X_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero
end XLemmas
/-! ### Some results about dvd (`∣`) on `monomial` and `X` -/
theorem monomial_dvd_monomial {r s : R} {i j : σ →₀ ℕ} :
monomial i r ∣ monomial j s ↔ (s = 0 ∨ i ≤ j) ∧ r ∣ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff] at hx
have hj := hx j
have hi := hx i
classical
simp_rw [coeff_monomial, if_pos] at hj hi
simp_rw [coeff_monomial_mul'] at hi hj
split_ifs at hi hj with hi hi
· exact ⟨Or.inr hi, _, hj⟩
· exact ⟨Or.inl hj, hj.symm ▸ dvd_zero _⟩
-- Porting note: two goals remain at this point in Lean 4
· simp_all only [or_true, dvd_mul_right, and_self]
· simp_all only [ite_self, le_refl, ite_true, dvd_mul_right, or_false, and_self]
· rintro ⟨h | hij, d, rfl⟩
· simp_rw [h, monomial_zero, dvd_zero]
· refine ⟨monomial (j - i) d, ?_⟩
rw [monomial_mul, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hij]
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_dvd_monomial MvPolynomial.monomial_dvd_monomial
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Division.lean | 244 | 247 | theorem monomial_one_dvd_monomial_one [Nontrivial R] {i j : σ →₀ ℕ} :
monomial i (1 : R) ∣ monomial j 1 ↔ i ≤ j := by |
rw [monomial_dvd_monomial]
simp_rw [one_ne_zero, false_or_iff, dvd_rfl, and_true_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
#align_import field_theory.separable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
/-!
# Separable polynomials
We define a polynomial to be separable if it is coprime with its derivative. We prove basic
properties about separable polynomials here.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Separable f`: a polynomial `f` is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative.
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S]
/-- A polynomial is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative. -/
def Separable (f : R[X]) : Prop :=
IsCoprime f (derivative f)
#align polynomial.separable Polynomial.Separable
theorem separable_def (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ IsCoprime f (derivative f) :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.separable_def Polynomial.separable_def
theorem separable_def' (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ ∃ a b : R[X], a * f + b * (derivative f) = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.separable_def' Polynomial.separable_def'
theorem not_separable_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬Separable (0 : R[X]) := by
rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
simp only [derivative_zero, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
#align polynomial.not_separable_zero Polynomial.not_separable_zero
theorem Separable.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {f : R[X]} (h : f.Separable) : f ≠ 0 :=
(not_separable_zero <| · ▸ h)
@[simp]
theorem separable_one : (1 : R[X]).Separable :=
isCoprime_one_left
#align polynomial.separable_one Polynomial.separable_one
@[nontriviality]
theorem separable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (f : R[X]) : f.Separable := by
simp [Separable, IsCoprime, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align polynomial.separable_of_subsingleton Polynomial.separable_of_subsingleton
theorem separable_X_add_C (a : R) : (X + C a).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
exact isCoprime_one_right
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_X_add_C Polynomial.separable_X_add_C
theorem separable_X : (X : R[X]).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_X]
exact isCoprime_one_right
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_X Polynomial.separable_X
theorem separable_C (r : R) : (C r).Separable ↔ IsUnit r := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_C, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_C Polynomial.separable_C
theorem Separable.of_mul_left {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : f.Separable := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
#align polynomial.separable.of_mul_left Polynomial.Separable.of_mul_left
theorem Separable.of_mul_right {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : g.Separable := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_mul_left
#align polynomial.separable.of_mul_right Polynomial.Separable.of_mul_right
theorem Separable.of_dvd {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hfg : g ∣ f) : g.Separable := by
rcases hfg with ⟨f', rfl⟩
exact Separable.of_mul_left hf
#align polynomial.separable.of_dvd Polynomial.Separable.of_dvd
theorem separable_gcd_left {F : Type*} [Field F] {f : F[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (g : F[X]) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hf (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g)
#align polynomial.separable_gcd_left Polynomial.separable_gcd_left
theorem separable_gcd_right {F : Type*} [Field F] {g : F[X]} (f : F[X]) (hg : g.Separable) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hg (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g)
#align polynomial.separable_gcd_right Polynomial.separable_gcd_right
theorem Separable.isCoprime {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : IsCoprime f g := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
#align polynomial.separable.is_coprime Polynomial.Separable.isCoprime
theorem Separable.of_pow' {f : R[X]} :
∀ {n : ℕ} (_h : (f ^ n).Separable), IsUnit f ∨ f.Separable ∧ n = 1 ∨ n = 0
| 0 => fun _h => Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl
| 1 => fun h => Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨pow_one f ▸ h, rfl⟩
| n + 2 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ] at h
exact Or.inl (isCoprime_self.1 h.isCoprime.of_mul_left_right)
#align polynomial.separable.of_pow' Polynomial.Separable.of_pow'
theorem Separable.of_pow {f : R[X]} (hf : ¬IsUnit f) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hfs : (f ^ n).Separable) : f.Separable ∧ n = 1 :=
(hfs.of_pow'.resolve_left hf).resolve_right hn
#align polynomial.separable.of_pow Polynomial.Separable.of_pow
theorem Separable.map {p : R[X]} (h : p.Separable) {f : R →+* S} : (p.map f).Separable :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := h
⟨a.map f, b.map f, by
rw [derivative_map, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_add, H,
Polynomial.map_one]⟩
#align polynomial.separable.map Polynomial.Separable.map
theorem _root_.Associated.separable {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) (h : f.Separable) : g.Separable := by
obtain ⟨⟨u, v, h1, h2⟩, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a * v + b * derivative v, b * v, ?_⟩
replace h := congr($h * $(h1))
have h3 := congr(derivative $(h1))
simp only [← ha, derivative_mul, derivative_one] at h3 ⊢
calc
_ = (a * f + b * derivative f) * (u * v)
+ (b * f) * (derivative u * v + u * derivative v) := by ring1
_ = 1 := by rw [h, h3]; ring1
theorem _root_.Associated.separable_iff {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) : f.Separable ↔ g.Separable := ⟨ha.separable, ha.symm.separable⟩
theorem Separable.mul_unit {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hg : IsUnit g) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_mul_unit_right f g hg).separable hf
theorem Separable.unit_mul {f g : R[X]} (hf : IsUnit f) (hg : g.Separable) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_unit_mul_right g f hf).separable hg
theorem Separable.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(derivative p).eval₂ f x ≠ 0 := by
intro hx'
obtain ⟨a, b, e⟩ := h
apply_fun Polynomial.eval₂ f x at e
simp only [eval₂_add, eval₂_mul, hx, mul_zero, hx', add_zero, eval₂_one, zero_ne_one] at e
theorem Separable.aeval_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : aeval x p = 0) :
aeval x (derivative p) ≠ 0 :=
h.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero (algebraMap R S) hx
variable (p q : ℕ)
theorem isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable {p q : R[X]} (hp : p.Separable) (hq : q * q ∣ p) :
IsUnit q := by
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := hq
apply isCoprime_self.mp
have : IsCoprime (q * (q * p))
(q * (derivative q * p + derivative q * p + q * derivative p)) := by
simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_add]
dsimp only [Separable] at hp
convert hp using 1
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_mul]
ring
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left this)
#align polynomial.is_unit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable Polynomial.isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable
theorem multiplicity_le_one_of_separable {p q : R[X]} (hq : ¬IsUnit q) (hsep : Separable p) :
multiplicity q p ≤ 1 := by
contrapose! hq
apply isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable hsep
rw [← sq]
apply multiplicity.pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity
have h : ⟨Part.Dom 1 ∧ Part.Dom 1, fun _ ↦ 2⟩ ≤ multiplicity q p := PartENat.add_one_le_of_lt hq
rw [and_self] at h
exact h
#align polynomial.multiplicity_le_one_of_separable Polynomial.multiplicity_le_one_of_separable
/-- A separable polynomial is square-free.
See `PerfectField.separable_iff_squarefree` for the converse when the coefficients are a perfect
field. -/
theorem Separable.squarefree {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) : Squarefree p := by
rw [multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one p]
exact fun f => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun hunit => multiplicity_le_one_of_separable hunit hsep
#align polynomial.separable.squarefree Polynomial.Separable.squarefree
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
theorem separable_X_sub_C {x : R} : Separable (X - C x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using separable_X_add_C (-x)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_X_sub_C Polynomial.separable_X_sub_C
theorem Separable.mul {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hg : g.Separable) (h : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_mul]
exact
((hf.mul_right h).add_mul_left_right _).mul_left ((h.symm.mul_right hg).mul_add_right_right _)
#align polynomial.separable.mul Polynomial.Separable.mul
theorem separable_prod' {ι : Sort _} {f : ι → R[X]} {s : Finset ι} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → IsCoprime (f x) (f y)) →
(∀ x ∈ s, (f x).Separable) → (∏ x ∈ s, f x).Separable :=
Finset.induction_on s (fun _ _ => separable_one) fun a s has ih h1 h2 => by
simp_rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert, forall_and] at h1 h2; rw [prod_insert has]
exact
h2.1.mul (ih h1.2.2 h2.2)
(IsCoprime.prod_right fun i his => h1.1.2 i his <| Ne.symm <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem his has)
#align polynomial.separable_prod' Polynomial.separable_prod'
theorem separable_prod {ι : Sort _} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R[X]} (h1 : Pairwise (IsCoprime on f))
(h2 : ∀ x, (f x).Separable) : (∏ x, f x).Separable :=
separable_prod' (fun _x _hx _y _hy hxy => h1 hxy) fun x _hx => h2 x
#align polynomial.separable_prod Polynomial.separable_prod
theorem Separable.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] {ι : Sort _} {f : ι → R} {s : Finset ι}
(hfs : (∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (f i))).Separable) {x y : ι} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hfxy : f x = f y) : x = y := by
by_contra hxy
rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
insert_erase (mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hxy) hy), prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
mul_assoc, hfxy, ← sq] at hfs
cases (hfs.of_mul_left.of_pow (not_isUnit_X_sub_C _) two_ne_zero).2
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C Polynomial.Separable.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C
theorem Separable.injective_of_prod_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] {ι : Sort _} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R}
(hfs : (∏ i, (X - C (f i))).Separable) : Function.Injective f := fun _x _y hfxy =>
hfs.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _) hfxy
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable.injective_of_prod_X_sub_C Polynomial.Separable.injective_of_prod_X_sub_C
theorem nodup_of_separable_prod [Nontrivial R] {s : Multiset R}
(hs : Separable (Multiset.map (fun a => X - C a) s).prod) : s.Nodup := by
rw [Multiset.nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons]
rintro a t rfl
refine not_isUnit_X_sub_C a (isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable hs ?_)
simpa only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons] using mul_dvd_mul_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align polynomial.nodup_of_separable_prod Polynomial.nodup_of_separable_prod
/-- If `IsUnit n` in a `CommRing R`, then `X ^ n - u` is separable for any unit `u`. -/
theorem separable_X_pow_sub_C_unit {n : ℕ} (u : Rˣ) (hn : IsUnit (n : R)) :
Separable (X ^ n - C (u : R)) := by
nontriviality R
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp at hn
apply (separable_def' (X ^ n - C (u : R))).2
obtain ⟨n', hn'⟩ := hn.exists_left_inv
refine ⟨-C ↑u⁻¹, C (↑u⁻¹ : R) * C n' * X, ?_⟩
rw [derivative_sub, derivative_C, sub_zero, derivative_pow X n, derivative_X, mul_one]
calc
-C ↑u⁻¹ * (X ^ n - C ↑u) + C ↑u⁻¹ * C n' * X * (↑n * X ^ (n - 1)) =
C (↑u⁻¹ * ↑u) - C ↑u⁻¹ * X ^ n + C ↑u⁻¹ * C (n' * ↑n) * (X * X ^ (n - 1)) := by
simp only [C.map_mul, C_eq_natCast]
ring
_ = 1 := by
simp only [Units.inv_mul, hn', C.map_one, mul_one, ← pow_succ',
Nat.sub_add_cancel (show 1 ≤ n from hpos), sub_add_cancel]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_X_pow_sub_C_unit Polynomial.separable_X_pow_sub_C_unit
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Separable.lean | 288 | 294 | theorem rootMultiplicity_le_one_of_separable [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p)
(x : R) : rootMultiplicity x p ≤ 1 := by |
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, dif_neg hp, ← PartENat.coe_le_coe, PartENat.natCast_get,
Nat.cast_one]
exact multiplicity_le_one_of_separable (not_isUnit_X_sub_C _) hsep
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import data.nat.part_enat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
#align part_enat PartENat
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
#align part_enat.some PartENat.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_some PartENat.dom_some
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm x y := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add x := Part.ext' (true_and_iff _) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero x := Part.ext' (and_true_iff _) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc x y z := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (true_and_iff _).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.some_eq_coe PartENat.some_eq_natCast
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
#align part_enat.coe_inj PartENat.natCast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_coe PartENat.dom_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Sup PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
#align part_enat.le_def PartENat.le_def
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
#align part_enat.cases_on' PartENat.casesOn'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
#align part_enat.cases_on PartENat.casesOn
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (false_and_iff _) fun h => h.left.elim
#align part_enat.top_add PartENat.top_add
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
#align part_enat.add_top PartENat.add_top
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
#align part_enat.coe_get PartENat.natCast_get
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_coe' PartENat.get_natCast'
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
#align part_enat.get_coe PartENat.get_natCast
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_add_get PartENat.coe_add_get
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_add PartENat.get_add
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_zero PartENat.get_zero
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_one PartENat.get_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom) :
Part.get (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) h = (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x)) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_some PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_of_dom PartENat.dom_of_le_of_dom
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_some PartENat.dom_of_le_some
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_coe PartENat.dom_of_le_natCast
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by rw [le_def])
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
#align part_enat.decidable_le PartENat.decidableLe
-- Porting note: Removed. Use `Nat.castAddMonoidHom` instead.
#noalign part_enat.coe_hom
#noalign part_enat.coe_coe_hom
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
#align part_enat.lt_def PartENat.lt_def
noncomputable instance orderedAddCommMonoid : OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder, PartENat.addCommMonoid with
add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
#align part_enat.semilattice_sup PartENat.semilatticeSup
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
#align part_enat.order_bot PartENat.orderBot
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
#align part_enat.order_top PartENat.orderTop
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
#align part_enat.coe_le_coe PartENat.coe_le_coe
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
#align part_enat.coe_lt_coe PartENat.coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_le_get PartENat.get_le_get
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
#align part_enat.le_coe_iff PartENat.le_coe_iff
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_iff PartENat.lt_coe_iff
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_le_iff PartENat.coe_le_iff
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_lt_iff PartENat.coe_lt_iff
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
#align part_enat.eq_zero_iff PartENat.eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
#align part_enat.ne_zero_iff PartENat.ne_zero_iff
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
#align part_enat.dom_of_lt PartENat.dom_of_lt
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
#align part_enat.top_eq_none PartENat.top_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
#align part_enat.coe_lt_top PartENat.natCast_lt_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.coe_ne_top PartENat.natCast_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.not_is_max_coe PartENat.not_isMax_natCast
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff PartENat.ne_top_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 405 | 406 | theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by |
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import group_theory.subgroup.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
/-!
# Subgroups
This file defines multiplicative and additive subgroups as an extension of submonoids, in a bundled
form (unbundled subgroups are in `Deprecated/Subgroups.lean`).
We prove subgroups of a group form a complete lattice, and results about images and preimages of
subgroups under group homomorphisms. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid homomorphisms.
There are also theorems about the subgroups generated by an element or a subset of a group,
defined both inductively and as the infimum of the set of subgroups containing a given
element/subset.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup G` : the type of subgroups of a group `G`
* `AddSubgroup A` : the type of subgroups of an additive group `A`
* `CompleteLattice (Subgroup G)` : the subgroups of `G` form a complete lattice
* `Subgroup.closure k` : the minimal subgroup that includes the set `k`
* `Subgroup.subtype` : the natural group homomorphism from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`
* `Subgroup.gi` : `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set
* `Subgroup.comap H f` : the preimage of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.map f H` : the image of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
* `MonoidHom.range f` : the range of the group homomorphism `f` is a subgroup
* `MonoidHom.ker f` : the kernel of a group homomorphism `f` is the subgroup of elements `x : G`
such that `f x = 1`
* `MonoidHom.eq_locus f g` : given group homomorphisms `f`, `g`, the elements of `G` such that
`f x = g x` form a subgroup of `G`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
open Function
open Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
/-- `InvMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under inverses. -/
class InvMemClass (S G : Type*) [Inv G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s
#align inv_mem_class InvMemClass
export InvMemClass (inv_mem)
/-- `NegMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under negation. -/
class NegMemClass (S G : Type*) [Neg G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → -x ∈ s
#align neg_mem_class NegMemClass
export NegMemClass (neg_mem)
/-- `SubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are subgroups of `G`. -/
class SubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends SubmonoidClass S G,
InvMemClass S G : Prop
#align subgroup_class SubgroupClass
/-- `AddSubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are
additive subgroups of `G`. -/
class AddSubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [SubNegMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends AddSubmonoidClass S G,
NegMemClass S G : Prop
#align add_subgroup_class AddSubgroupClass
attribute [to_additive] InvMemClass SubgroupClass
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] inv_mem neg_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mem_iff {S G} [InvolutiveInv G] {_ : SetLike S G} [InvMemClass S G] {H : S}
{x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ inv_mem h, inv_mem⟩
#align inv_mem_iff inv_mem_iff
#align neg_mem_iff neg_mem_iff
@[simp] theorem abs_mem_iff {S G} [AddGroup G] [LinearOrder G] {_ : SetLike S G}
[NegMemClass S G] {H : S} {x : G} : |x| ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H := by
cases abs_choice x <;> simp [*]
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"An additive subgroup is closed under subtraction."]
theorem div_mem {x y : M} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact mul_mem hx (inv_mem hy)
#align div_mem div_mem
#align sub_mem sub_mem
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))]
theorem zpow_mem {x : M} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K
| (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact pow_mem hx n
| -[n+1] => by
rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact inv_mem (pow_mem hx n.succ)
#align zpow_mem zpow_mem
#align zsmul_mem zsmul_mem
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
#align div_mem_comm_iff div_mem_comm_iff
#align sub_mem_comm_iff sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive /-(attr := simp)-/] -- Porting note: `simp` cannot simplify LHS
theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ H ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, P x := by
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, inv_mem x_in, by simp [hx]⟩
#align exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hba => by simpa using mul_mem hba (inv_mem h), fun hb => mul_mem hb h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_right mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_mem_cancel_right add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hab => by simpa using mul_mem (inv_mem h) hab, mul_mem h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_left mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_mem_cancel_left add_mem_cancel_left
namespace InvMemClass
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [Inv G] [SetLike S G]
[InvMemClass S G] {H : S} : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_inv InvMemClass.inv
#align add_subgroup_class.has_neg NegMemClass.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : (x⁻¹).1 = x.1⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_inv InvMemClass.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_neg NegMemClass.coe_neg
end InvMemClass
namespace SubgroupClass
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-15"))] alias coe_inv := InvMemClass.coe_inv
-- Here we assume H, K, and L are subgroups, but in fact any one of them
-- could be allowed to be a subsemigroup.
-- Counterexample where K and L are submonoids: H = ℤ, K = ℕ, L = -ℕ
-- Counterexample where H and K are submonoids: H = {n | n = 0 ∨ 3 ≤ n}, K = 3ℕ + 4ℕ, L = 5ℤ
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_union {H K L : S} : (H : Set G) ⊆ K ∪ L ↔ H ≤ K ∨ H ≤ L := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h x xH ↦ h.imp (· xH) (· xH)⟩
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists]
exact fun ⟨x, xH, xK⟩ y yH ↦ (h <| mul_mem xH yH).elim
((h yH).resolve_left fun yK ↦ xK <| (mul_mem_cancel_right yK).mp ·)
(mul_mem_cancel_left <| (h xH).resolve_left xK).mp
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G]
[SubgroupClass S G] {H : S} : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_div SubgroupClass.div
#align add_subgroup_class.has_sub AddSubgroupClass.sub
/-- An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroupClass.zsmul {M S} [SubNegMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a.1, zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup_class.has_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power. -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow {M S} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [SubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a.1 ^ n, zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_zpow SubgroupClass.zpow
-- Porting note: additive align statement is given above
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (x / y).1 = x.1 / y.1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_div SubgroupClass.coe_div
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_sub AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub
variable (H)
-- Prefer subclasses of `Group` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance (priority := 75) toGroup : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_group SubgroupClass.toGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddGroup
-- Prefer subclasses of `CommGroup` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance (priority := 75) toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] :
CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_comm_group SubgroupClass.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"The natural group hom from an additive subgroup of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.subtype SubgroupClass.subtype
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype AddSubgroupClass.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : (SubgroupClass.subtype H : H → G) = ((↑) : H → G) := by
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_subtype SubgroupClass.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_subtype AddSubgroupClass.coeSubtype
variable {H}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_pow SubgroupClass.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_smul AddSubgroupClass.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_zpow SubgroupClass.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.coe_zsmul
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : S} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.prop⟩) fun _ _=> rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion AddSubgroupClass.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_self (x : H) : inclusion le_rfl x = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_self SubgroupClass.inclusion_self
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_self AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_mk {h : H ≤ K} (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = ⟨x, h hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_mk SubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_mk AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_right (h : H ≤ K) (x : K) (hx : (x : G) ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_right SubgroupClass.inclusion_right
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_right AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_right
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_inclusion {L : S} (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) (x : H) :
inclusion hKL (inclusion hHK x) = inclusion (hHK.trans hKL) x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : S} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup_class.coe_inclusion SubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : S} (hH : H ≤ K) :
(SubgroupClass.subtype K).comp (inclusion hH) = SubgroupClass.subtype H := by
ext
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, coeSubtype, coe_inclusion]
#align subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion SubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
end SubgroupClass
end SubgroupClass
/-- A subgroup of a group `G` is a subset containing 1, closed under multiplication
and closed under multiplicative inverse. -/
structure Subgroup (G : Type*) [Group G] extends Submonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align subgroup Subgroup
/-- An additive subgroup of an additive group `G` is a subset containing 0, closed
under addition and additive inverse. -/
structure AddSubgroup (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddSubmonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → -x ∈ carrier
#align add_subgroup AddSubgroup
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup
-- Porting note: Removed, translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid] Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `Subgroup` as a `Submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subgroup.toSubmonoid
#align subgroup.to_submonoid Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret an `AddSubgroup` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (Subgroup G) G where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hp,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := p
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hq,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := q
congr
-- Porting note: Below can probably be written more uniformly
@[to_additive]
instance : SubgroupClass (Subgroup G) G where
inv_mem := Subgroup.inv_mem' _
one_mem _ := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).one_mem'
mul_mem := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).mul_mem'
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_carrier Subgroup.mem_carrier
#align add_subgroup.mem_carrier AddSubgroup.mem_carrier
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mk {s : Set G} {x : G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
x ∈ mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_mk Subgroup.mem_mk
#align add_subgroup.mem_mk AddSubgroup.mem_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_set_mk {s : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
(mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_set_mk Subgroup.coe_set_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_set_mk AddSubgroup.coe_set_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_le_mk {s t : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) (h_one') (h_mul') (h_inv') :
mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ≤ mk ⟨⟨t, h_one'⟩, h_mul'⟩ h_inv' ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mk_le_mk Subgroup.mk_le_mk
#align add_subgroup.mk_le_mk AddSubgroup.mk_le_mk
initialize_simps_projections Subgroup (carrier → coe)
initialize_simps_projections AddSubgroup (carrier → coe)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) : (K.toSubmonoid : Set G) = K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_to_submonoid Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.coe_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.coe_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) (x : G) : x ∈ K.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_to_submonoid Subgroup.mem_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.mem_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.mem_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
-- fun p q h => SetLike.ext'_iff.2 (show _ from SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h)
fun p q h => by
have := SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h
rw [coe_toSubmonoid, coe_toSubmonoid] at this
exact SetLike.ext'_iff.2 this
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_injective Subgroup.toSubmonoid_injective
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_injective AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_eq {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid = q.toSubmonoid ↔ p = q :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_eq Subgroup.toSubmonoid_eq
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_eq AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_eq
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) := fun _ _ =>
id
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_strictMono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_mono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_mono
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_le {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid ≤ q.toSubmonoid ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_le Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_le AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_nonempty (s : Subgroup G) : (s : Set G).Nonempty := ⟨1, one_mem _⟩
end Subgroup
/-!
### Conversion to/from `Additive`/`Multiplicative`
-/
section mul_add
/-- Subgroups of a group `G` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `Additive G`. -/
@[simps!]
def Subgroup.toAddSubgroup : Subgroup G ≃o AddSubgroup (Additive G) where
toFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
invFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup Subgroup.toAddSubgroup
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_apply_coe
/-- Additive subgroup of an additive group `Additive G` are isomorphic to subgroup of `G`. -/
abbrev AddSubgroup.toSubgroup' : AddSubgroup (Additive G) ≃o Subgroup G :=
Subgroup.toAddSubgroup.symm
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup' AddSubgroup.toSubgroup'
/-- Additive subgroups of an additive group `A` are isomorphic to subgroups of `Multiplicative A`.
-/
@[simps!]
def AddSubgroup.toSubgroup : AddSubgroup A ≃o Subgroup (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
invFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup AddSubgroup.toSubgroup
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
/-- Subgroups of an additive group `Multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `A`.
-/
abbrev Subgroup.toAddSubgroup' : Subgroup (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubgroup A :=
AddSubgroup.toSubgroup.symm
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup' Subgroup.toAddSubgroup'
end mul_add
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
/-- Copy of a subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an additive subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities"]
protected def copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = K) : Subgroup G where
carrier := s
one_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.one_mem'
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.mul_mem'
inv_mem' hx := by simpa [hs] using hx -- Porting note: `▸` didn't work here
#align subgroup.copy Subgroup.copy
#align add_subgroup.copy AddSubgroup.copy
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : (K.copy s hs : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_copy Subgroup.coe_copy
#align add_subgroup.coe_copy AddSubgroup.coe_copy
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : K.copy s hs = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subgroup.copy_eq Subgroup.copy_eq
#align add_subgroup.copy_eq AddSubgroup.copy_eq
/-- Two subgroups are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two `AddSubgroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {H K : Subgroup G} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ H ↔ x ∈ K) : H = K :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subgroup.ext Subgroup.ext
#align add_subgroup.ext AddSubgroup.ext
/-- A subgroup contains the group's 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` contains the group's 0."]
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ H :=
one_mem _
#align subgroup.one_mem Subgroup.one_mem
#align add_subgroup.zero_mem AddSubgroup.zero_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under addition."]
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : G} : x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H :=
mul_mem
#align subgroup.mul_mem Subgroup.mul_mem
#align add_subgroup.add_mem AddSubgroup.add_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under inverse."]
protected theorem inv_mem {x : G} : x ∈ H → x⁻¹ ∈ H :=
inv_mem
#align subgroup.inv_mem Subgroup.inv_mem
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem AddSubgroup.neg_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under subtraction."]
protected theorem div_mem {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H :=
div_mem hx hy
#align subgroup.div_mem Subgroup.div_mem
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem AddSubgroup.sub_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_mem_iff {x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
inv_mem_iff
#align subgroup.inv_mem_iff Subgroup.inv_mem_iff
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem_iff AddSubgroup.neg_mem_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
#align subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff Subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff AddSubgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem (K : Subgroup G) {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ K ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, P x :=
exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem Subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align add_subgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem AddSubgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_right h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_right AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_left h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_left AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem pow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
pow_mem hx
#align subgroup.pow_mem Subgroup.pow_mem
#align add_subgroup.nsmul_mem AddSubgroup.nsmul_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem zpow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
zpow_mem hx
#align subgroup.zpow_mem Subgroup.zpow_mem
#align add_subgroup.zsmul_mem AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem
/-- Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under subtraction"]
def ofDiv (s : Set G) (hsn : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x * y⁻¹ ∈ s) :
Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s := by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hsn
simpa using hs x hx x hx
have inv_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s := fun x hx => by simpa using hs 1 one_mem x hx
{ carrier := s
one_mem' := one_mem
inv_mem' := inv_mem _
mul_mem' := fun hx hy => by simpa using hs _ hx _ (inv_mem _ hy) }
#align subgroup.of_div Subgroup.ofDiv
#align add_subgroup.of_sub AddSubgroup.ofSub
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an addition."]
instance mul : Mul H :=
H.toSubmonoid.mul
#align subgroup.has_mul Subgroup.mul
#align add_subgroup.has_add AddSubgroup.add
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a zero."]
instance one : One H :=
H.toSubmonoid.one
#align subgroup.has_one Subgroup.one
#align add_subgroup.has_zero AddSubgroup.zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, H.inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_inv Subgroup.inv
#align add_subgroup.has_neg AddSubgroup.neg
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, H.div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_div Subgroup.div
#align add_subgroup.has_sub AddSubgroup.sub
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a natural scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.nsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℕ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.nsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_nsmul AddSubgroup.nsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a natural power -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected instance npow : Pow H ℕ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.pow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_npow Subgroup.npow
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.zsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_zsmul AddSubgroup.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_zpow Subgroup.zpow
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul (x y : H) : (↑(x * y) : G) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mul Subgroup.coe_mul
#align add_subgroup.coe_add AddSubgroup.coe_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : H) : G) = 1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_one Subgroup.coe_one
#align add_subgroup.coe_zero AddSubgroup.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : ↑(x⁻¹ : H) = (x⁻¹ : G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inv Subgroup.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup.coe_neg AddSubgroup.coe_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (↑(x / y) : G) = ↑x / ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_div Subgroup.coe_div
#align add_subgroup.coe_sub AddSubgroup.coe_sub
-- Porting note: removed simp, theorem has variable as head symbol
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mk (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : ((⟨x, hx⟩ : H) : G) = x :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mk Subgroup.coe_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_mk AddSubgroup.coe_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_pow Subgroup.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup.coe_nsmul AddSubgroup.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_zpow Subgroup.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup.coe_zsmul AddSubgroup.coe_zsmul
@[to_additive] -- This can be proved by `Submonoid.mk_eq_one`
theorem mk_eq_one {g : G} {h} : (⟨g, h⟩ : H) = 1 ↔ g = 1 := by simp
#align subgroup.mk_eq_one_iff Subgroup.mk_eq_one
#align add_subgroup.mk_eq_zero_iff AddSubgroup.mk_eq_zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance toGroup {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_group Subgroup.toGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_group AddSubgroup.toAddGroup
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (H : Subgroup G) : CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_comm_group Subgroup.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroup.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural group hom from an `AddSubgroup` of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align subgroup.subtype Subgroup.subtype
#align add_subgroup.subtype AddSubgroup.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : ⇑ H.subtype = ((↑) : H → G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_subtype Subgroup.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup.coe_subtype AddSubgroup.coeSubtype
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_injective : Function.Injective (Subgroup.subtype H) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.subtype_injective Subgroup.subtype_injective
#align add_subgroup.subtype_injective AddSubgroup.subtype_injective
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.2⟩) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.inclusion Subgroup.inclusion
#align add_subgroup.inclusion AddSubgroup.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, coe_mk, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup.coe_inclusion Subgroup.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.coe_inclusion AddSubgroup.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_injective {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : Function.Injective <| inclusion h :=
Set.inclusion_injective h
#align subgroup.inclusion_injective Subgroup.inclusion_injective
#align add_subgroup.inclusion_injective AddSubgroup.inclusion_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : H ≤ K) :
K.subtype.comp (inclusion hH) = H.subtype :=
rfl
#align subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion Subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
/-- The subgroup `G` of the group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup G` of the `AddGroup G`."]
instance : Top (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := fun _ => Set.mem_univ _ }⟩
/-- The top subgroup is isomorphic to the group.
This is the group version of `Submonoid.topEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!)
"The top additive subgroup is isomorphic to the additive group.
This is the additive group version of `AddSubmonoid.topEquiv`."]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgroup G) ≃* G :=
Submonoid.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv Subgroup.topEquiv
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv AddSubgroup.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_apply AddSubgroup.topEquiv_apply
/-- The trivial subgroup `{1}` of a group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial `AddSubgroup` `{0}` of an `AddGroup` `G`."]
instance : Bot (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := by simp}⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_bot {x : G} : x ∈ (⊥ : Subgroup G) ↔ x = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_bot Subgroup.mem_bot
#align add_subgroup.mem_bot AddSubgroup.mem_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_top (x : G) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subgroup.mem_top Subgroup.mem_top
#align add_subgroup.mem_top AddSubgroup.mem_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_top Subgroup.coe_top
#align add_subgroup.coe_top AddSubgroup.coe_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = {1} :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_bot Subgroup.coe_bot
#align add_subgroup.coe_bot AddSubgroup.coe_bot
@[to_additive]
instance : Unique (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨1⟩, fun g => Subtype.ext g.2⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_toSubmonoid : (⊤ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.top_to_submonoid Subgroup.top_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.top_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.top_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_toSubmonoid : (⊥ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.bot_to_submonoid Subgroup.bot_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.bot_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.bot_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_iff_forall : H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ H, x = (1 : G) :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff.symm.trans <| Submonoid.eq_bot_iff_forall _
#align subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall AddSubgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton H] : H = ⊥ := by
rw [Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall]
intro y hy
rw [← Subgroup.coe_mk H y hy, Subsingleton.elim (⟨y, hy⟩ : H) 1, Subgroup.coe_one]
#align subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton Subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton AddSubgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_eq_univ {H : Subgroup G} : (H : Set G) = Set.univ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
(SetLike.ext'_iff.trans (by rfl)).symm
#align subgroup.coe_eq_univ Subgroup.coe_eq_univ
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_univ AddSubgroup.coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {H : Subgroup G} : (∃ g : G, (H : Set G) = {g}) ↔ H = ⊥ :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hg⟩ =>
haveI : Subsingleton (H : Set G) := by
rw [hg]
infer_instance
H.eq_bot_of_subsingleton,
fun h => ⟨1, SetLike.ext'_iff.mp h⟩⟩
#align subgroup.coe_eq_singleton Subgroup.coe_eq_singleton
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_singleton AddSubgroup.coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
rw [Subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (fun x => x ∈ H) (1 : H)]
simp
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) [Nontrivial H] :
∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ 1 := by
rwa [← Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ H ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one, ne_eq, eq_bot_iff_forall]
simp only [ne_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial."]
theorem bot_or_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ Nontrivial H := by
have := nontrivial_iff_ne_bot H
tauto
#align subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial Subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial AddSubgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a non-identity element. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a nonzero element."]
theorem bot_or_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
convert H.bot_or_nontrivial
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
#align subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one Subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
lemma ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one {H : Subgroup G} : H ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ a : ↥H, a ≠ 1 := by
rw [← nontrivial_iff_ne_bot, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
simp only [ne_eq, Subtype.exists, mk_eq_one, exists_prop]
/-- The inf of two subgroups is their intersection. -/
@[to_additive "The inf of two `AddSubgroup`s is their intersection."]
instance : Inf (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun H₁ H₂ =>
{ H₁.toSubmonoid ⊓ H₂.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun ⟨hx, hx'⟩ => ⟨H₁.inv_mem hx, H₂.inv_mem hx'⟩ }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subgroup G) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subgroup G) : Set G) = (p : Set G) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inf Subgroup.coe_inf
#align add_subgroup.coe_inf AddSubgroup.coe_inf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_inf Subgroup.mem_inf
#align add_subgroup.mem_inf AddSubgroup.mem_inf
@[to_additive]
instance : InfSet (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ (⨅ S ∈ s, Subgroup.toSubmonoid S).copy (⋂ S ∈ s, ↑S) (by simp) with
inv_mem' := fun {x} hx =>
Set.mem_biInter fun i h => i.inv_mem (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hx i h) }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_sInf (H : Set (Subgroup G)) : ((sInf H : Subgroup G) : Set G) = ⋂ s ∈ H, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_Inf Subgroup.coe_sInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_Inf AddSubgroup.coe_sInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {x : G} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subgroup.mem_Inf Subgroup.mem_sInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_Inf AddSubgroup.mem_sInf
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} {x : G} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align subgroup.mem_infi Subgroup.mem_iInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_infi AddSubgroup.mem_iInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set G) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
#align subgroup.coe_infi Subgroup.coe_iInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_infi AddSubgroup.coe_iInf
/-- Subgroups of a group form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup`s of an `AddGroup` form a complete lattice."]
instance : CompleteLattice (Subgroup G) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subgroup G) fun _s =>
IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun S _x hx => (mem_bot.1 hx).symm ▸ S.one_mem
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _S x _hx => mem_top x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _a _b _c ha hb _x hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _a _b _x => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _a _b _x => And.right }
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : S ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_left; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_left Subgroup.mem_sup_left
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_left AddSubgroup.mem_sup_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : T ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_right; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_right Subgroup.mem_sup_right
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_right AddSubgroup.mem_sup_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : Subgroup G} {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) : x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
(S ⊔ T).mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
#align subgroup.mul_mem_sup Subgroup.mul_mem_sup
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_sup AddSubgroup.add_mem_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ iSup S :=
have : S i ≤ iSup S := le_iSup _ _; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem Subgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sSup_of_mem {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {s : Subgroup G} (hs : s ∈ S) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ s → x ∈ sSup S :=
have : s ≤ sSup S := le_sSup hs; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem Subgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (Subgroup G) ↔ Subsingleton G :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨fun x y =>
have : ∀ i : G, i = 1 := fun i =>
mem_bot.mp <| Subsingleton.elim (⊤ : Subgroup G) ⊥ ▸ mem_top i
(this x).trans (this y).symm⟩,
fun h => ⟨fun x y => Subgroup.ext fun i => Subsingleton.elim 1 i ▸ by simp [Subgroup.one_mem]⟩⟩
#align subgroup.subsingleton_iff Subgroup.subsingleton_iff
#align add_subgroup.subsingleton_iff AddSubgroup.subsingleton_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) ↔ Nontrivial G :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff Subgroup.nontrivial_iff
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff
@[to_additive]
instance [Subsingleton G] : Unique (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨⊥⟩, fun a => @Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_iff.mpr ‹_›) a _⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [Nontrivial G] : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) :=
nontrivial_iff.mpr ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_top_iff' : H = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : G, x ∈ H :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align subgroup.eq_top_iff' Subgroup.eq_top_iff'
#align add_subgroup.eq_top_iff' AddSubgroup.eq_top_iff'
/-- The `Subgroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (k : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
sInf { K | k ⊆ K }
#align subgroup.closure Subgroup.closure
#align add_subgroup.closure AddSubgroup.closure
variable {k : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure {x : G} : x ∈ closure k ↔ ∀ K : Subgroup G, k ⊆ K → x ∈ K :=
mem_sInf
#align subgroup.mem_closure Subgroup.mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure AddSubgroup.mem_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
theorem subset_closure : k ⊆ closure k := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hK => hK hx
#align subgroup.subset_closure Subgroup.subset_closure
#align add_subgroup.subset_closure AddSubgroup.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : G} (hP : P ∉ closure k) : P ∉ k := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure Subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure AddSubgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
open Set
/-- A subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"An additive subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`"]
theorem closure_le : closure k ≤ K ↔ k ⊆ K :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align subgroup.closure_le Subgroup.closure_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_le AddSubgroup.closure_le
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : k ⊆ K) (h₂ : K ≤ closure k) : closure k = K :=
le_antisymm ((closure_le <| K).2 h₁) h₂
#align subgroup.closure_eq_of_le Subgroup.closure_eq_of_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_of_le AddSubgroup.closure_eq_of_le
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of `k`, and
is preserved under multiplication and inverse, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure
of `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p`
holds for `0` and all elements of `k`, and is preserved under addition and inverses, then `p`
holds for all elements of the additive closure of `k`."]
theorem closure_induction {p : G → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure k) (mem : ∀ x ∈ k, p x) (one : p 1)
(mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (inv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ ⟨⟨⟨setOf p, fun {x y} ↦ mul x y⟩, one⟩, fun {x} ↦ inv x⟩ k).2 mem h
#align subgroup.closure_induction Subgroup.closure_induction
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction AddSubgroup.closure_induction
/-- A dependent version of `Subgroup.closure_induction`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "A dependent version of `AddSubgroup.closure_induction`. "]
theorem closure_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure k → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ k), p x (subset_closure h)) (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(inv : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p x⁻¹ (inv_mem hx)) {x} (hx : x ∈ closure k) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hc : p x hx) => hc
exact
closure_induction hx (fun x hx => ⟨_, mem x hx⟩) ⟨_, one⟩
(fun x y ⟨hx', hx⟩ ⟨hy', hy⟩ => ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩) fun x ⟨hx', hx⟩ => ⟨_, inv _ _ hx⟩
#align subgroup.closure_induction' Subgroup.closure_induction'
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction' AddSubgroup.closure_induction'
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership, for
predicates with two arguments."]
theorem closure_induction₂ {p : G → G → Prop} {x} {y : G} (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hy : y ∈ closure k)
(Hk : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, p x y) (H1_left : ∀ x, p 1 x) (H1_right : ∀ x, p x 1)
(Hmul_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ * x₂) y)
(Hmul_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ * y₂)) (Hinv_left : ∀ x y, p x y → p x⁻¹ y)
(Hinv_right : ∀ x y, p x y → p x y⁻¹) : p x y :=
closure_induction hx
(fun x xk => closure_induction hy (Hk x xk) (H1_right x) (Hmul_right x) (Hinv_right x))
(H1_left y) (fun z z' => Hmul_left z z' y) fun z => Hinv_left z y
#align subgroup.closure_induction₂ Subgroup.closure_induction₂
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction₂ AddSubgroup.closure_induction₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_closure_coe_preimage {k : Set G} : closure (((↑) : closure k → G) ⁻¹' k) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x =>
Subtype.recOn x fun x hx _ => by
refine closure_induction' (fun g hg => ?_) ?_ (fun g₁ g₂ hg₁ hg₂ => ?_) (fun g hg => ?_) hx
· exact subset_closure hg
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem
· exact inv_mem
#align subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage Subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
#align add_subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage AddSubgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
/-- If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is a commutative group. -/
@[to_additive
"If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is an additive
commutative group."]
def closureCommGroupOfComm {k : Set G} (hcomm : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, x * y = y * x) :
CommGroup (closure k) :=
{ (closure k).toGroup with
mul_comm := fun x y => by
ext
simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul]
refine
closure_induction₂ x.prop y.prop hcomm (fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc])
(fun x y h => by
rw [inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one])
fun x y h => by
rw [mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_assoc, h, ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_self, one_mul] }
#align subgroup.closure_comm_group_of_comm Subgroup.closureCommGroupOfComm
#align add_subgroup.closure_add_comm_group_of_comm AddSubgroup.closureAddCommGroupOfComm
variable (G)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure G _) (↑) where
choice s _ := closure s
gc s t := @closure_le _ _ t s
le_l_u _s := subset_closure
choice_eq _s _h := rfl
#align subgroup.gi Subgroup.gi
#align add_subgroup.gi AddSubgroup.gi
variable {G}
/-- Subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`. -/
@[to_additive
"Additive subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`"]
theorem closure_mono ⦃h k : Set G⦄ (h' : h ⊆ k) : closure h ≤ closure k :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.monotone_l h'
#align subgroup.closure_mono Subgroup.closure_mono
#align add_subgroup.closure_mono AddSubgroup.closure_mono
/-- Closure of a subgroup `K` equals `K`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Additive closure of an additive subgroup `K` equals `K`"]
theorem closure_eq : closure (K : Set G) = K :=
(Subgroup.gi G).l_u_eq K
#align subgroup.closure_eq Subgroup.closure_eq
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq AddSubgroup.closure_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set G) = ⊥ :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_bot
#align subgroup.closure_empty Subgroup.closure_empty
#align add_subgroup.closure_empty AddSubgroup.closure_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set G) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top G _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
#align subgroup.closure_univ Subgroup.closure_univ
#align add_subgroup.closure_univ AddSubgroup.closure_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_union (s t : Set G) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_sup
#align subgroup.closure_union Subgroup.closure_union
#align add_subgroup.closure_union AddSubgroup.closure_union
@[to_additive]
theorem sup_eq_closure (H H' : Subgroup G) : H ⊔ H' = closure ((H : Set G) ∪ (H' : Set G)) := by
simp_rw [closure_union, closure_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set G) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_iSup
#align subgroup.closure_Union Subgroup.closure_iUnion
#align add_subgroup.closure_Union AddSubgroup.closure_iUnion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_eq_bot_iff : closure k = ⊥ ↔ k ⊆ {1} := le_bot_iff.symm.trans <| closure_le _
#align subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_eq_closure {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subgroup G) :
⨆ i, p i = closure (⋃ i, (p i : Set G)) := by simp_rw [closure_iUnion, closure_eq]
#align subgroup.supr_eq_closure Subgroup.iSup_eq_closure
#align add_subgroup.supr_eq_closure AddSubgroup.iSup_eq_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by an element of a group equals the set of integer number powers of
the element. -/
@[to_additive
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by an element of an `AddGroup` equals the set of
natural number multiples of the element."]
theorem mem_closure_singleton {x y : G} : y ∈ closure ({x} : Set G) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x ^ n = y := by
refine
⟨fun hy => closure_induction hy ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
hn ▸ zpow_mem (subset_closure <| mem_singleton x) n⟩
· intro y hy
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton hy]
exact ⟨1, zpow_one x⟩
· exact ⟨0, zpow_zero x⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n + m, zpow_add x n m⟩
rintro _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨-n, zpow_neg x n⟩
#align subgroup.mem_closure_singleton Subgroup.mem_closure_singleton
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure_singleton AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_singleton_one : closure ({1} : Set G) = ⊥ := by
simp [eq_bot_iff_forall, mem_closure_singleton]
#align subgroup.closure_singleton_one Subgroup.closure_singleton_one
#align add_subgroup.closure_singleton_zero AddSubgroup.closure_singleton_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem le_closure_toSubmonoid (S : Set G) : Submonoid.closure S ≤ (closure S).toSubmonoid :=
Submonoid.closure_le.2 subset_closure
#align subgroup.le_closure_to_submonoid Subgroup.le_closure_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.le_closure_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.le_closure_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top {S : Set G} (h : Submonoid.closure S = ⊤) :
closure S = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff' _).2 fun _ => le_closure_toSubmonoid _ <| h.symm ▸ trivial
#align subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top Subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top AddSubgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {K : ι → Subgroup G} (hK : Directed (· ≤ ·) K)
{x : G} : x ∈ (iSup K : Subgroup G) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ K i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ le_iSup K i hi⟩
suffices x ∈ closure (⋃ i, (K i : Set G)) → ∃ i, x ∈ K i by
simpa only [closure_iUnion, closure_eq (K _)] using this
refine fun hx ↦ closure_induction hx (fun _ ↦ mem_iUnion.1) ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact hι.elim fun i ↦ ⟨i, (K i).one_mem⟩
· rintro x y ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases hK i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩
exact ⟨k, mul_mem (hki hi) (hkj hj)⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨i, inv_mem hi⟩
#align subgroup.mem_supr_of_directed Subgroup.mem_iSup_of_directed
#align add_subgroup.mem_supr_of_directed AddSubgroup.mem_iSup_of_directed
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] {S : ι → Subgroup G} (hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) :
((⨆ i, S i : Subgroup G) : Set G) = ⋃ i, S i :=
Set.ext fun x ↦ by simp [mem_iSup_of_directed hS]
#align subgroup.coe_supr_of_directed Subgroup.coe_iSup_of_directed
#align add_subgroup.coe_supr_of_directed AddSubgroup.coe_iSup_of_directed
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sSup_of_directedOn {K : Set (Subgroup G)} (Kne : K.Nonempty) (hK : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) K)
{x : G} : x ∈ sSup K ↔ ∃ s ∈ K, x ∈ s := by
haveI : Nonempty K := Kne.to_subtype
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed hK.directed_val, SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk,
exists_prop]
#align subgroup.mem_Sup_of_directed_on Subgroup.mem_sSup_of_directedOn
#align add_subgroup.mem_Sup_of_directed_on AddSubgroup.mem_sSup_of_directedOn
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- The preimage of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of an `AddSubgroup` along an `AddMonoid` homomorphism
is an `AddSubgroup`."]
def comap {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N) (H : Subgroup N) : Subgroup G :=
{ H.toSubmonoid.comap f with
carrier := f ⁻¹' H
inv_mem' := fun {a} ha => show f a⁻¹ ∈ H by rw [f.map_inv]; exact H.inv_mem ha }
#align subgroup.comap Subgroup.comap
#align add_subgroup.comap AddSubgroup.comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_comap (K : Subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (K.comap f : Set G) = f ⁻¹' K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_comap Subgroup.coe_comap
#align add_subgroup.coe_comap AddSubgroup.coe_comap
@[simp]
theorem toAddSubgroup_comap {G₂ : Type*} [Group G₂] (f : G →* G₂) (s : Subgroup G₂) :
s.toAddSubgroup.comap (MonoidHom.toAdditive f) = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup (s.comap f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_comap {A A₂ : Type*} [AddGroup A] [AddGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A₂) :
s.toSubgroup.comap (AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f) = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup (s.comap f) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_comap {K : Subgroup N} {f : G →* N} {x : G} : x ∈ K.comap f ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_comap Subgroup.mem_comap
#align add_subgroup.mem_comap AddSubgroup.mem_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_mono {f : G →* N} {K K' : Subgroup N} : K ≤ K' → comap f K ≤ comap f K' :=
preimage_mono
#align subgroup.comap_mono Subgroup.comap_mono
#align add_subgroup.comap_mono AddSubgroup.comap_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_comap (K : Subgroup P) (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) :
(K.comap g).comap f = K.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_comap Subgroup.comap_comap
#align add_subgroup.comap_comap AddSubgroup.comap_comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_id (K : Subgroup N) : K.comap (MonoidHom.id _) = K := by
ext
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_id Subgroup.comap_id
#align add_subgroup.comap_id AddSubgroup.comap_id
/-- The image of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of an `AddSubgroup` along an `AddMonoid` homomorphism
is an `AddSubgroup`."]
def map (f : G →* N) (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup N :=
{ H.toSubmonoid.map f with
carrier := f '' H
inv_mem' := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, H.inv_mem hx, f.map_inv x⟩ }
#align subgroup.map Subgroup.map
#align add_subgroup.map AddSubgroup.map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_map (f : G →* N) (K : Subgroup G) : (K.map f : Set N) = f '' K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_map Subgroup.coe_map
#align add_subgroup.coe_map AddSubgroup.coe_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_map {f : G →* N} {K : Subgroup G} {y : N} : y ∈ K.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, f x = y := Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_map Subgroup.mem_map
#align add_subgroup.mem_map AddSubgroup.mem_map
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : G →* N) {K : Subgroup G} {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : f x ∈ K.map f :=
mem_image_of_mem f hx
#align subgroup.mem_map_of_mem Subgroup.mem_map_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_map_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_map_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : G →* N) (K : Subgroup G) (x : K) : f x ∈ K.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
#align subgroup.apply_coe_mem_map Subgroup.apply_coe_mem_map
#align add_subgroup.apply_coe_mem_map AddSubgroup.apply_coe_mem_map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mono {f : G →* N} {K K' : Subgroup G} : K ≤ K' → map f K ≤ map f K' :=
image_subset _
#align subgroup.map_mono Subgroup.map_mono
#align add_subgroup.map_mono AddSubgroup.map_mono
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id : K.map (MonoidHom.id G) = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_id _
#align subgroup.map_id Subgroup.map_id
#align add_subgroup.map_id AddSubgroup.map_id
@[to_additive]
theorem map_map (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : (K.map f).map g = K.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_image _ _ _
#align subgroup.map_map Subgroup.map_map
#align add_subgroup.map_map AddSubgroup.map_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_one_eq_bot : K.map (1 : G →* N) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr <| by
rintro x ⟨y, _, rfl⟩
simp
#align subgroup.map_one_eq_bot Subgroup.map_one_eq_bot
#align add_subgroup.map_zero_eq_bot AddSubgroup.map_zero_eq_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : G ≃* N} {K : Subgroup G} {x : N} :
x ∈ K.map f.toMonoidHom ↔ f.symm x ∈ K := by
erw [@Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (↑K) f.toEquiv x]; rfl
#align subgroup.mem_map_equiv Subgroup.mem_map_equiv
#align add_subgroup.mem_map_equiv AddSubgroup.mem_map_equiv
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Subgroup.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mem_map_iff_mem {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) {K : Subgroup G} {x : G} :
f x ∈ K.map f ↔ x ∈ K :=
hf.mem_set_image
#align subgroup.mem_map_iff_mem Subgroup.mem_map_iff_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_map_iff_mem AddSubgroup.mem_map_iff_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm' (f : G ≃* N) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.map f.toMonoidHom = K.comap f.symm.toMonoidHom :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
#align subgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm Subgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm'
#align add_subgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm AddSubgroup.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm'
@[to_additive]
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : G ≃* N) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.map f = K.comap (G := N) f.symm :=
map_equiv_eq_comap_symm' _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : N ≃* G) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.comap (G := N) f = K.map f.symm :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm' (f : N ≃* G) (K : Subgroup G) :
K.comap f.toMonoidHom = K.map f.symm.toMonoidHom :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
#align subgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm Subgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm'
#align add_subgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm AddSubgroup.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm'
@[to_additive]
theorem map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq {H : Subgroup N} {e : G ≃* N} :
H.map ↑e.symm = K ↔ K.map ↑e = H := by
constructor <;> rintro rfl
· rw [map_map, ← MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_trans, MulEquiv.symm_trans_self,
MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_refl, map_id]
· rw [map_map, ← MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_trans, MulEquiv.self_trans_symm,
MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_refl, map_id]
#align subgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq Subgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq
#align add_subgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq AddSubgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : G →* N} {K : Subgroup G} {H : Subgroup N} :
K.map f ≤ H ↔ K ≤ H.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
#align subgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap Subgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align add_subgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap AddSubgroup.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem gc_map_comap (f : G →* N) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align subgroup.gc_map_comap Subgroup.gc_map_comap
#align add_subgroup.gc_map_comap AddSubgroup.gc_map_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem map_sup (H K : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊔ K).map f = H.map f ⊔ K.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
#align subgroup.map_sup Subgroup.map_sup
#align add_subgroup.map_sup AddSubgroup.map_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → Subgroup G) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
#align subgroup.map_supr Subgroup.map_iSup
#align add_subgroup.map_supr AddSubgroup.map_iSup
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_sup_comap_le (H K : Subgroup N) (f : G →* N) :
comap f H ⊔ comap f K ≤ comap f (H ⊔ K) :=
Monotone.le_map_sup (fun _ _ => comap_mono) H K
#align subgroup.comap_sup_comap_le Subgroup.comap_sup_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.comap_sup_comap_le AddSubgroup.comap_sup_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_comap_le {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → Subgroup N) :
⨆ i, (s i).comap f ≤ (iSup s).comap f :=
Monotone.le_map_iSup fun _ _ => comap_mono
#align subgroup.supr_comap_le Subgroup.iSup_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.supr_comap_le AddSubgroup.iSup_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_inf (H K : Subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊓ K).comap f = H.comap f ⊓ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
#align subgroup.comap_inf Subgroup.comap_inf
#align add_subgroup.comap_inf AddSubgroup.comap_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → Subgroup N) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_iInf
#align subgroup.comap_infi Subgroup.comap_iInf
#align add_subgroup.comap_infi AddSubgroup.comap_iInf
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inf_le (H K : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) : map f (H ⊓ K) ≤ map f H ⊓ map f K :=
le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_mono inf_le_right)
#align subgroup.map_inf_le Subgroup.map_inf_le
#align add_subgroup.map_inf_le AddSubgroup.map_inf_le
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inf_eq (H K : Subgroup G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
map f (H ⊓ K) = map f H ⊓ map f K := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq]
simp [Set.image_inter hf]
#align subgroup.map_inf_eq Subgroup.map_inf_eq
#align add_subgroup.map_inf_eq AddSubgroup.map_inf_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_bot (f : G →* N) : (⊥ : Subgroup G).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align subgroup.map_bot Subgroup.map_bot
#align add_subgroup.map_bot AddSubgroup.map_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_top_of_surjective (f : G →* N) (h : Function.Surjective f) : Subgroup.map f ⊤ = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
intro x _
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h x
exact ⟨y, trivial, hy⟩
#align subgroup.map_top_of_surjective Subgroup.map_top_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.map_top_of_surjective AddSubgroup.map_top_of_surjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_top (f : G →* N) : (⊤ : Subgroup N).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align subgroup.comap_top Subgroup.comap_top
#align add_subgroup.comap_top AddSubgroup.comap_top
/-- For any subgroups `H` and `K`, view `H ⊓ K` as a subgroup of `K`. -/
@[to_additive "For any subgroups `H` and `K`, view `H ⊓ K` as a subgroup of `K`."]
def subgroupOf (H K : Subgroup G) : Subgroup K :=
H.comap K.subtype
#align subgroup.subgroup_of Subgroup.subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf
/-- If `H ≤ K`, then `H` as a subgroup of `K` is isomorphic to `H`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `H ≤ K`, then `H` as a subgroup of `K` is isomorphic to `H`."]
def subgroupOfEquivOfLe {G : Type*} [Group G] {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) :
H.subgroupOf K ≃* H where
toFun g := ⟨g.1, g.2⟩
invFun g := ⟨⟨g.1, h g.2⟩, g.2⟩
left_inv _g := Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext rfl)
right_inv _g := Subtype.ext rfl
map_mul' _g _h := rfl
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_equiv_of_le AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOfEquivOfLe
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_symm_apply_coe_coe Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe_symm_apply_coe_coe
#align add_subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_symm_apply_coe_coe AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOfEquivOfLe_symm_apply_coe_coe
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_apply_coe Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.subgroup_of_equiv_of_le_apply_coe AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOfEquivOfLe_apply_coe
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_subtype (H K : Subgroup G) : H.comap K.subtype = H.subgroupOf K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_subtype Subgroup.comap_subtype
#align add_subgroup.comap_subtype AddSubgroup.comap_subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_inclusion_subgroupOf {K₁ K₂ : Subgroup G} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) (H : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K₂).comap (inclusion h) = H.subgroupOf K₁ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.comap_inclusion_subgroup_of Subgroup.comap_inclusion_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.comap_inclusion_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.comap_inclusion_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_subgroupOf (H K : Subgroup G) : (H.subgroupOf K : Set K) = K.subtype ⁻¹' H :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_subgroup_of Subgroup.coe_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.coe_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.coe_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_subgroupOf {H K : Subgroup G} {h : K} : h ∈ H.subgroupOf K ↔ (h : G) ∈ H :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_subgroup_of Subgroup.mem_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.mem_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.mem_addSubgroupOf
-- TODO(kmill): use `K ⊓ H` order for RHS to match `Subtype.image_preimage_coe`
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_map_subtype (H K : Subgroup G) : (H.subgroupOf K).map K.subtype = H ⊓ K :=
SetLike.ext' <| by refine Subtype.image_preimage_coe _ _ |>.trans ?_; apply Set.inter_comm
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_map_subtype Subgroup.subgroupOf_map_subtype
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_map_subtype AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_map_subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_subgroupOf : (⊥ : Subgroup G).subgroupOf H = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm (Subgroup.ext fun _g => Subtype.ext_iff)
#align subgroup.bot_subgroup_of Subgroup.bot_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.bot_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.bot_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_subgroupOf : (⊤ : Subgroup G).subgroupOf H = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.top_subgroup_of Subgroup.top_subgroupOf
#align add_subgroup.top_add_subgroup_of AddSubgroup.top_addSubgroupOf
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_bot_eq_bot : H.subgroupOf ⊥ = ⊥ :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_bot_eq_bot Subgroup.subgroupOf_bot_eq_bot
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_bot_eq_bot AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_bot_eq_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_bot_eq_top : H.subgroupOf ⊥ = ⊤ :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_bot_eq_top Subgroup.subgroupOf_bot_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_bot_eq_top AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_bot_eq_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_self : H.subgroupOf H = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun g _hg => g.2
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_self Subgroup.subgroupOf_self
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_self AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_inj {H₁ H₂ K : Subgroup G} :
H₁.subgroupOf K = H₂.subgroupOf K ↔ H₁ ⊓ K = H₂ ⊓ K := by
simpa only [SetLike.ext_iff, mem_inf, mem_subgroupOf, and_congr_left_iff] using Subtype.forall
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_inj Subgroup.subgroupOf_inj
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_inj AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_inj
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_right (H K : Subgroup G) : (H ⊓ K).subgroupOf K = H.subgroupOf K :=
subgroupOf_inj.2 (inf_right_idem _ _)
#align subgroup.inf_subgroup_of_right Subgroup.inf_subgroupOf_right
#align add_subgroup.inf_add_subgroup_of_right AddSubgroup.inf_addSubgroupOf_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_left (H K : Subgroup G) : (K ⊓ H).subgroupOf K = H.subgroupOf K := by
rw [inf_comm, inf_subgroupOf_right]
#align subgroup.inf_subgroup_of_left Subgroup.inf_subgroupOf_left
#align add_subgroup.inf_add_subgroup_of_left AddSubgroup.inf_addSubgroupOf_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_eq_bot {H K : Subgroup G} : H.subgroupOf K = ⊥ ↔ Disjoint H K := by
rw [disjoint_iff, ← bot_subgroupOf, subgroupOf_inj, bot_inf_eq]
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_eq_bot Subgroup.subgroupOf_eq_bot
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_eq_bot AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_eq_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subgroupOf_eq_top {H K : Subgroup G} : H.subgroupOf K = ⊤ ↔ K ≤ H := by
rw [← top_subgroupOf, subgroupOf_inj, top_inf_eq, inf_eq_right]
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_eq_top Subgroup.subgroupOf_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_eq_top AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_eq_top
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
#align subgroup.prod Subgroup.prod
#align add_subgroup.prod AddSubgroup.prod
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_prod Subgroup.coe_prod
#align add_subgroup.coe_prod AddSubgroup.coe_prod
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_prod Subgroup.mem_prod
#align add_subgroup.mem_prod AddSubgroup.mem_prod
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
#align subgroup.prod_mono Subgroup.prod_mono
#align add_subgroup.prod_mono AddSubgroup.prod_mono
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
#align subgroup.prod_mono_right Subgroup.prod_mono_right
#align add_subgroup.prod_mono_right AddSubgroup.prod_mono_right
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
#align subgroup.prod_mono_left Subgroup.prod_mono_left
#align add_subgroup.prod_mono_left AddSubgroup.prod_mono_left
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
#align subgroup.prod_top Subgroup.prod_top
#align add_subgroup.prod_top AddSubgroup.prod_top
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
#align subgroup.top_prod Subgroup.top_prod
#align add_subgroup.top_prod AddSubgroup.top_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
#align subgroup.top_prod_top Subgroup.top_prod_top
#align add_subgroup.top_prod_top AddSubgroup.top_prod_top
@[to_additive]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod, Prod.one_eq_mk]
#align subgroup.bot_prod_bot Subgroup.bot_prod_bot
#align add_subgroup.bot_sum_bot AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
#align subgroup.le_prod_iff Subgroup.le_prod_iff
#align add_subgroup.le_prod_iff AddSubgroup.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
#align subgroup.prod_le_iff Subgroup.prod_le_iff
#align add_subgroup.prod_le_iff AddSubgroup.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_eq] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
#align subgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.prod_eq_bot_iff
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align subgroup.prod_equiv Subgroup.prodEquiv
#align add_subgroup.prod_equiv AddSubgroup.prodEquiv
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
#align submonoid.pi Submonoid.pi
#align add_submonoid.pi AddSubmonoid.pi
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
#align subgroup.pi Subgroup.pi
#align add_subgroup.pi AddSubgroup.pi
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_pi Subgroup.coe_pi
#align add_subgroup.coe_pi AddSubgroup.coe_pi
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_pi Subgroup.mem_pi
#align add_subgroup.mem_pi AddSubgroup.mem_pi
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
#align subgroup.pi_top Subgroup.pi_top
#align add_subgroup.pi_top AddSubgroup.pi_top
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
#align subgroup.pi_empty Subgroup.pi_empty
#align add_subgroup.pi_empty AddSubgroup.pi_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
#align subgroup.pi_bot Subgroup.pi_bot
#align add_subgroup.pi_bot AddSubgroup.pi_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
#align subgroup.le_pi_iff Subgroup.le_pi_iff
#align add_subgroup.le_pi_iff AddSubgroup.le_pi_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
#align subgroup.mul_single_mem_pi Subgroup.mulSingle_mem_pi
#align add_subgroup.single_mem_pi AddSubgroup.single_mem_pi
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
#align subgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.pi_eq_bot_iff
end Pi
/-- A subgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure Normal : Prop where
/-- `N` is closed under conjugation -/
conj_mem : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : G, g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H
#align subgroup.normal Subgroup.Normal
attribute [class] Normal
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
/-- An AddSubgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g + n - g ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure Normal (H : AddSubgroup A) : Prop where
/-- `N` is closed under additive conjugation -/
conj_mem : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : A, g + n + -g ∈ H
#align add_subgroup.normal AddSubgroup.Normal
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Normal
attribute [class] Normal
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_comm {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (H : Subgroup G) : H.Normal :=
⟨by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm]⟩
#align subgroup.normal_of_comm Subgroup.normal_of_comm
#align add_subgroup.normal_of_comm AddSubgroup.normal_of_comm
namespace Normal
variable (nH : H.Normal)
@[to_additive]
theorem conj_mem' (n : G) (hn : n ∈ H) (g : G) :
g⁻¹ * n * g ∈ H := by
convert nH.conj_mem n hn g⁻¹
rw [inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_comm {a b : G} (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have : a⁻¹ * (a * b) * a⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ H := nH.conj_mem (a * b) h a⁻¹
-- Porting note: Previous code was:
-- simpa
simp_all only [inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_inv]
#align subgroup.normal.mem_comm Subgroup.Normal.mem_comm
#align add_subgroup.normal.mem_comm AddSubgroup.Normal.mem_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a * b ∈ H ↔ b * a ∈ H :=
⟨nH.mem_comm, nH.mem_comm⟩
#align subgroup.normal.mem_comm_iff Subgroup.Normal.mem_comm_iff
#align add_subgroup.normal.mem_comm_iff AddSubgroup.Normal.mem_comm_iff
end Normal
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
#align subgroup.characteristic Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
#align subgroup.normal_of_characteristic Subgroup.normal_of_characteristic
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
#align add_subgroup.characteristic AddSubgroup.Characteristic
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
#align add_subgroup.normal_of_characteristic AddSubgroup.normal_of_characteristic
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq Subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le Subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap Subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq Subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_map_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le Subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_map_le
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
#align subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map Subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map
#align add_subgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map AddSubgroup.characteristic_iff_le_map
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
#align subgroup.bot_characteristic Subgroup.botCharacteristic
#align add_subgroup.bot_characteristic AddSubgroup.botCharacteristic
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
#align subgroup.top_characteristic Subgroup.topCharacteristic
#align add_subgroup.top_characteristic AddSubgroup.topCharacteristic
variable (H)
section Normalizer
/-- The `normalizer` of `H` is the largest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The `normalizer` of `H` is the largest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal."]
def normalizer : Subgroup G where
carrier := { g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' {a b} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ H) n := by
rw [hb, ha]
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev]
inv_mem' {a} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) n := by
rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)]
simp only [inv_inv, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_right_inv, mul_one]
#align subgroup.normalizer Subgroup.normalizer
#align add_subgroup.normalizer AddSubgroup.normalizer
-- variant for sets.
-- TODO should this replace `normalizer`?
/-- The `setNormalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy `g*S*g⁻¹=S` -/
@[to_additive
"The `setNormalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy
`g+S-g=S`."]
def setNormalizer (S : Set G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ S }
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' {a b} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ S) n := by
rw [hb, ha]
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev]
inv_mem' {a} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) n := by
rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)]
simp only [inv_inv, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_right_inv, mul_one]
#align subgroup.set_normalizer Subgroup.setNormalizer
#align add_subgroup.set_normalizer AddSubgroup.setNormalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_normalizer_iff {g : G} : g ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ h, h ∈ H ↔ g * h * g⁻¹ ∈ H :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff
#align add_subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff AddSubgroup.mem_normalizer_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_normalizer_iff'' {g : G} : g ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ h : G, h ∈ H ↔ g⁻¹ * h * g ∈ H := by
rw [← inv_mem_iff (x := g), mem_normalizer_iff, inv_inv]
#align subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'' Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff''
#align add_subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'' AddSubgroup.mem_normalizer_iff''
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_normalizer_iff' {g : G} : g ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ n, n * g ∈ H ↔ g * n ∈ H :=
⟨fun h n => by rw [h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_right], fun h n => by
rw [mul_assoc, ← h, inv_mul_cancel_right]⟩
#align subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff' Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'
#align add_subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff' AddSubgroup.mem_normalizer_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer : H ≤ normalizer H := fun x xH n => by
rw [H.mul_mem_cancel_right (H.inv_mem xH), H.mul_mem_cancel_left xH]
#align subgroup.le_normalizer Subgroup.le_normalizer
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer AddSubgroup.le_normalizer
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
⟨fun x xH g => by simpa only [mem_subgroupOf] using (g.2 x.1).1 xH⟩
#align subgroup.normal_in_normalizer Subgroup.normal_in_normalizer
#align add_subgroup.normal_in_normalizer AddSubgroup.normal_in_normalizer
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
#align subgroup.normalizer_eq_top Subgroup.normalizer_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.normalizer_eq_top AddSubgroup.normalizer_eq_top
open scoped Classical
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) : K ≤ H.normalizer :=
fun x hx y =>
⟨fun yH => hK.conj_mem ⟨y, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x, hx⟩, fun yH => by
simpa [mem_subgroupOf, mul_assoc] using
hK.conj_mem ⟨x * y * x⁻¹, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x⁻¹, K.inv_mem hx⟩⟩
#align subgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal Subgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal AddSubgroup.le_normalizer_of_normal
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
#align subgroup.le_normalizer_comap Subgroup.le_normalizer_comap
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer_comap AddSubgroup.le_normalizer_comap
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
#align subgroup.le_normalizer_map Subgroup.le_normalizer_map
#align add_subgroup.le_normalizer_map AddSubgroup.le_normalizer_map
variable (G)
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
#align normalizer_condition NormalizerCondition
variable {G}
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, true_and_iff, le_top, Ne]
tauto
#align normalizer_condition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing
variable (H)
/-- In a group that satisfies the normalizer condition, every maximal subgroup is normal -/
theorem NormalizerCondition.normal_of_coatom (hnc : NormalizerCondition G) (hmax : IsCoatom H) :
H.Normal :=
normalizer_eq_top.mp (hmax.2 _ (hnc H (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hmax.1)))
#align subgroup.normalizer_condition.normal_of_coatom Subgroup.NormalizerCondition.normal_of_coatom
end Normalizer
/-- Commutativity of a subgroup -/
structure IsCommutative : Prop where
/-- `*` is commutative on `H` -/
is_comm : Std.Commutative (α := H) (· * ·)
#align subgroup.is_commutative Subgroup.IsCommutative
attribute [class] IsCommutative
/-- Commutativity of an additive subgroup -/
structure _root_.AddSubgroup.IsCommutative (H : AddSubgroup A) : Prop where
/-- `+` is commutative on `H` -/
is_comm : Std.Commutative (α := H) (· + ·)
#align add_subgroup.is_commutative AddSubgroup.IsCommutative
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.IsCommutative
attribute [class] AddSubgroup.IsCommutative
/-- A commutative subgroup is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "A commutative subgroup is commutative."]
instance IsCommutative.commGroup [h : H.IsCommutative] : CommGroup H :=
{ H.toGroup with mul_comm := h.is_comm.comm }
#align subgroup.is_commutative.comm_group Subgroup.IsCommutative.commGroup
#align add_subgroup.is_commutative.add_comm_group AddSubgroup.IsCommutative.addCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance map_isCommutative (f : G →* G') [H.IsCommutative] : (H.map f).IsCommutative :=
⟨⟨by
rintro ⟨-, a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨-, b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_mul, coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, ← map_mul, ← map_mul]
exact congr_arg f (Subtype.ext_iff.mp (mul_comm (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) ⟨b, hb⟩))⟩⟩
#align subgroup.map_is_commutative Subgroup.map_isCommutative
#align add_subgroup.map_is_commutative AddSubgroup.map_isCommutative
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_injective_isCommutative {f : G' →* G} (hf : Injective f) [H.IsCommutative] :
(H.comap f).IsCommutative :=
⟨⟨fun a b =>
Subtype.ext
(by
have := mul_comm (⟨f a, a.2⟩ : H) (⟨f b, b.2⟩ : H)
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_mul, coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, ← map_mul, ← map_mul,
hf.eq_iff] at this)⟩⟩
#align subgroup.comap_injective_is_commutative Subgroup.comap_injective_isCommutative
#align add_subgroup.comap_injective_is_commutative AddSubgroup.comap_injective_isCommutative
@[to_additive]
instance subgroupOf_isCommutative [H.IsCommutative] : (H.subgroupOf K).IsCommutative :=
H.comap_injective_isCommutative Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.subgroup_of_is_commutative Subgroup.subgroupOf_isCommutative
#align add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of_is_commutative AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf_isCommutative
end Subgroup
namespace MulEquiv
variable {H : Type*} [Group H]
/--
An isomorphism of groups gives an order isomorphism between the lattices of subgroups,
defined by sending subgroups to their inverse images.
See also `MulEquiv.mapSubgroup` which maps subgroups to their forward images.
-/
@[simps]
def comapSubgroup (f : G ≃* H) : Subgroup H ≃o Subgroup G where
toFun := Subgroup.comap f
invFun := Subgroup.comap f.symm
left_inv sg := by simp [Subgroup.comap_comap]
right_inv sh := by simp [Subgroup.comap_comap]
map_rel_iff' {sg1 sg2} :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [Subgroup.comap_comap] using
Subgroup.comap_mono (f := (f.symm : H →* G)) h, Subgroup.comap_mono⟩
/--
An isomorphism of groups gives an order isomorphism between the lattices of subgroups,
defined by sending subgroups to their forward images.
See also `MulEquiv.comapSubgroup` which maps subgroups to their inverse images.
-/
@[simps]
def mapSubgroup {H : Type*} [Group H] (f : G ≃* H) : Subgroup G ≃o Subgroup H where
toFun := Subgroup.map f
invFun := Subgroup.map f.symm
left_inv sg := by simp [Subgroup.map_map]
right_inv sh := by simp [Subgroup.map_map]
map_rel_iff' {sg1 sg2} :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [Subgroup.map_map] using
Subgroup.map_mono (f := (f.symm : H →* G)) h, Subgroup.map_mono⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_comap {H : Type*} [Group H] (f : G ≃* H) {K : Subgroup H} :
IsCoatom (Subgroup.comap (f : G →* H) K) ↔ IsCoatom K :=
OrderIso.isCoatom_iff (f.comapSubgroup) K
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_map (f : G ≃* H) {K : Subgroup G} :
IsCoatom (Subgroup.map (f : G →* H) K) ↔ IsCoatom K :=
OrderIso.isCoatom_iff (f.mapSubgroup) K
end MulEquiv
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
#align group.conjugates_of_set Group.conjugatesOfSet
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
erw [Set.mem_iUnion₂]; simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
#align group.mem_conjugates_of_set_iff Group.mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
#align group.subset_conjugates_of_set Group.subset_conjugatesOfSet
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
#align group.conjugates_of_set_mono Group.conjugatesOfSet_mono
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
#align group.conjugates_subset_normal Group.conjugates_subset_normal
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
#align group.conjugates_of_set_subset Group.conjugatesOfSet_subset
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
#align group.conj_mem_conjugates_of_set Group.conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
#align subgroup.normal_closure Subgroup.normalClosure
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
#align subgroup.conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure Subgroup.conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
#align subgroup.subset_normal_closure Subgroup.subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
#align subgroup.le_normal_closure Subgroup.le_normalClosure
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction h (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y ihx ihy => ?_) fun x ihx => ?_
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
#align subgroup.normal_closure_normal Subgroup.normalClosure_normal
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction w (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y ihx ihy => ?_) fun x ihx => ?_
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
#align subgroup.normal_closure_le_normal Subgroup.normalClosure_le_normal
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
#align subgroup.normal_closure_subset_iff Subgroup.normalClosure_subset_iff
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
#align subgroup.normal_closure_mono Subgroup.normalClosure_mono
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun N => le_iInf fun hN => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
#align subgroup.normal_closure_eq_infi Subgroup.normalClosure_eq_iInf
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
#align subgroup.normal_closure_eq_self Subgroup.normalClosure_eq_self
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
#align subgroup.normal_closure_idempotent Subgroup.normalClosure_idempotent
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
#align subgroup.closure_le_normal_closure Subgroup.closure_le_normalClosure
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
#align subgroup.normal_closure_closure_eq_normal_closure Subgroup.normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_self]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {a} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
#align subgroup.normal_core Subgroup.normalCore
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
#align subgroup.normal_core_le Subgroup.normalCore_le
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
#align subgroup.normal_core_normal Subgroup.normalCore_normal
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
#align subgroup.normal_le_normal_core Subgroup.normal_le_normalCore
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
#align subgroup.normal_core_mono Subgroup.normalCore_mono
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
#align subgroup.normal_core_eq_supr Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
#align subgroup.normal_core_eq_self Subgroup.normalCore_eq_self
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
#align subgroup.normal_core_idempotent Subgroup.normalCore_idempotent
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
/-- The range of a monoid homomorphism from a group is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The range of an `AddMonoidHom` from an `AddGroup` is an `AddSubgroup`."]
def range (f : G →* N) : Subgroup N :=
Subgroup.copy ((⊤ : Subgroup G).map f) (Set.range f) (by simp [Set.ext_iff])
#align monoid_hom.range MonoidHom.range
#align add_monoid_hom.range AddMonoidHom.range
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_range (f : G →* N) : (f.range : Set N) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_range MonoidHom.coe_range
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_range AddMonoidHom.coe_range
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_range {f : G →* N} {y : N} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align monoid_hom.mem_range MonoidHom.mem_range
#align add_monoid_hom.mem_range AddMonoidHom.mem_range
@[to_additive]
theorem range_eq_map (f : G →* N) : f.range = (⊤ : Subgroup G).map f := by ext; simp
#align monoid_hom.range_eq_map MonoidHom.range_eq_map
#align add_monoid_hom.range_eq_map AddMonoidHom.range_eq_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem restrict_range (f : G →* N) : (f.restrict K).range = K.map f := by
simp_rw [SetLike.ext_iff, mem_range, mem_map, restrict_apply, SetLike.exists,
exists_prop, forall_const]
#align monoid_hom.restrict_range MonoidHom.restrict_range
#align add_monoid_hom.restrict_range AddMonoidHom.restrict_range
/-- The canonical surjective group homomorphism `G →* f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →* N`. -/
@[to_additive
"The canonical surjective `AddGroup` homomorphism `G →+ f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →+ N`."]
def rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) : G →* f.range :=
codRestrict f _ fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align monoid_hom.range_restrict MonoidHom.rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.range_restrict AddMonoidHom.rangeRestrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) (g : G) : (f.rangeRestrict g : N) = f g :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_range_restrict MonoidHom.coe_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.coe_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_comp_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) :
((↑) : f.range → N) ∘ (⇑f.rangeRestrict : G → f.range) = f :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_comp_range_restrict MonoidHom.coe_comp_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_comp_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.coe_comp_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_comp_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) : f.range.subtype.comp f.rangeRestrict = f :=
ext <| f.coe_rangeRestrict
#align monoid_hom.subtype_comp_range_restrict MonoidHom.subtype_comp_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.subtype_comp_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.subtype_comp_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive]
theorem rangeRestrict_surjective (f : G →* N) : Function.Surjective f.rangeRestrict :=
fun ⟨_, g, rfl⟩ => ⟨g, rfl⟩
#align monoid_hom.range_restrict_surjective MonoidHom.rangeRestrict_surjective
#align add_monoid_hom.range_restrict_surjective AddMonoidHom.rangeRestrict_surjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma rangeRestrict_injective_iff {f : G →* N} : Injective f.rangeRestrict ↔ Injective f := by
convert Set.injective_codRestrict _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_range (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : f.range.map g = (g.comp f).range := by
rw [range_eq_map, range_eq_map]; exact (⊤ : Subgroup G).map_map g f
#align monoid_hom.map_range MonoidHom.map_range
#align add_monoid_hom.map_range AddMonoidHom.map_range
@[to_additive]
theorem range_top_iff_surjective {N} [Group N] {f : G →* N} :
f.range = (⊤ : Subgroup N) ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans <| Iff.trans (by rw [coe_range, coe_top]) Set.range_iff_surjective
#align monoid_hom.range_top_iff_surjective MonoidHom.range_top_iff_surjective
#align add_monoid_hom.range_top_iff_surjective AddMonoidHom.range_top_iff_surjective
/-- The range of a surjective monoid homomorphism is the whole of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"The range of a surjective `AddMonoid` homomorphism is the whole of the codomain."]
theorem range_top_of_surjective {N} [Group N] (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
f.range = (⊤ : Subgroup N) :=
range_top_iff_surjective.2 hf
#align monoid_hom.range_top_of_surjective MonoidHom.range_top_of_surjective
#align add_monoid_hom.range_top_of_surjective AddMonoidHom.range_top_of_surjective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem range_one : (1 : G →* N).range = ⊥ :=
SetLike.ext fun x => by simpa using @comm _ (· = ·) _ 1 x
#align monoid_hom.range_one MonoidHom.range_one
#align add_monoid_hom.range_zero AddMonoidHom.range_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.subtype_range (H : Subgroup G) : H.subtype.range = H := by
rw [range_eq_map, ← SetLike.coe_set_eq, coe_map, Subgroup.coeSubtype]
ext
simp
#align subgroup.subtype_range Subgroup.subtype_range
#align add_subgroup.subtype_range AddSubgroup.subtype_range
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.inclusion_range {H K : Subgroup G} (h_le : H ≤ K) :
(inclusion h_le).range = H.subgroupOf K :=
Subgroup.ext fun g => Set.ext_iff.mp (Set.range_inclusion h_le) g
#align subgroup.inclusion_range Subgroup.inclusion_range
#align add_subgroup.inclusion_range AddSubgroup.inclusion_range
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_range_eq_of_le {G₁ G₂ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] {K : Subgroup G₂}
(f : G₁ →* G₂) (h : f.range ≤ K) :
f.range.subgroupOf K = (f.codRestrict K fun x => h ⟨x, rfl⟩).range := by
ext k
refine exists_congr ?_
simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
#align monoid_hom.subgroup_of_range_eq_of_le MonoidHom.subgroupOf_range_eq_of_le
#align add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_of_range_eq_of_le AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupOf_range_eq_of_le
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAdditive_range (f : G →* G') :
(MonoidHom.toAdditive f).range = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup f.range := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiplicative_range {A A' : Type*} [AddGroup A] [AddGroup A'] (f : A →+ A') :
(AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f).range = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup f.range := rfl
/-- Computable alternative to `MonoidHom.ofInjective`. -/
@[to_additive "Computable alternative to `AddMonoidHom.ofInjective`."]
def ofLeftInverse {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) : G ≃* f.range :=
{ f.rangeRestrict with
toFun := f.rangeRestrict
invFun := g ∘ f.range.subtype
left_inv := h
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, y, rfl⟩
apply Subtype.ext
rw [coe_rangeRestrict, Function.comp_apply, Subgroup.coeSubtype, Subtype.coe_mk, h] }
#align monoid_hom.of_left_inverse MonoidHom.ofLeftInverse
#align add_monoid_hom.of_left_inverse AddMonoidHom.ofLeftInverse
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLeftInverse_apply {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (x : G) :
↑(ofLeftInverse h x) = f x :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_apply MonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_apply AddMonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLeftInverse_symm_apply {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(x : f.range) : (ofLeftInverse h).symm x = g x :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_symm_apply MonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_symm_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.of_left_inverse_symm_apply AddMonoidHom.ofLeftInverse_symm_apply
/-- The range of an injective group homomorphism is isomorphic to its domain. -/
@[to_additive "The range of an injective additive group homomorphism is isomorphic to its
domain."]
noncomputable def ofInjective {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) : G ≃* f.range :=
MulEquiv.ofBijective (f.codRestrict f.range fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩)
⟨fun x y h => hf (Subtype.ext_iff.mp h), by
rintro ⟨x, y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
#align monoid_hom.of_injective MonoidHom.ofInjective
#align add_monoid_hom.of_injective AddMonoidHom.ofInjective
@[to_additive]
theorem ofInjective_apply {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) {x : G} :
↑(ofInjective hf x) = f x :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.of_injective_apply MonoidHom.ofInjective_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.of_injective_apply AddMonoidHom.ofInjective_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem apply_ofInjective_symm {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : f.range) :
f ((ofInjective hf).symm x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (ofInjective hf).apply_symm_apply x
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
/-- The multiplicative kernel of a monoid homomorphism is the subgroup of elements `x : G` such that
`f x = 1` -/
@[to_additive
"The additive kernel of an `AddMonoid` homomorphism is the `AddSubgroup` of elements
such that `f x = 0`"]
def ker (f : G →* M) : Subgroup G :=
{ MonoidHom.mker f with
inv_mem' := fun {x} (hx : f x = 1) =>
calc
f x⁻¹ = f x * f x⁻¹ := by rw [hx, one_mul]
_ = 1 := by rw [← map_mul, mul_inv_self, map_one] }
#align monoid_hom.ker MonoidHom.ker
#align add_monoid_hom.ker AddMonoidHom.ker
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ker (f : G →* M) {x : G} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align monoid_hom.mem_ker MonoidHom.mem_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.mem_ker AddMonoidHom.mem_ker
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_ker (f : G →* M) : (f.ker : Set G) = (f : G → M) ⁻¹' {1} :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_ker MonoidHom.coe_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_ker AddMonoidHom.coe_ker
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_toHomUnits {M} [Monoid M] (f : G →* M) : f.toHomUnits.ker = f.ker := by
ext x
simp [mem_ker, Units.ext_iff]
#align monoid_hom.ker_to_hom_units MonoidHom.ker_toHomUnits
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_to_hom_add_units AddMonoidHom.ker_toHomAddUnits
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff (f : G →* M) {x y : G} : f x = f y ↔ y⁻¹ * x ∈ f.ker := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_ker, map_mul, h, ← map_mul, inv_mul_self, map_one]
· rw [← one_mul x, ← mul_inv_self y, mul_assoc, map_mul, f.mem_ker.1 h, mul_one]
#align monoid_hom.eq_iff MonoidHom.eq_iff
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_iff AddMonoidHom.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
instance decidableMemKer [DecidableEq M] (f : G →* M) : DecidablePred (· ∈ f.ker) := fun x =>
decidable_of_iff (f x = 1) f.mem_ker
#align monoid_hom.decidable_mem_ker MonoidHom.decidableMemKer
#align add_monoid_hom.decidable_mem_ker AddMonoidHom.decidableMemKer
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_ker (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : g.ker.comap f = (g.comp f).ker :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.comap_ker MonoidHom.comap_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.comap_ker AddMonoidHom.comap_ker
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_bot (f : G →* N) : (⊥ : Subgroup N).comap f = f.ker :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.comap_bot MonoidHom.comap_bot
#align add_monoid_hom.comap_bot AddMonoidHom.comap_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_restrict (f : G →* N) : (f.restrict K).ker = f.ker.subgroupOf K :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.ker_restrict MonoidHom.ker_restrict
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_restrict AddMonoidHom.ker_restrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_codRestrict {S} [SetLike S N] [SubmonoidClass S N] (f : G →* N) (s : S)
(h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : (f.codRestrict s h).ker = f.ker :=
SetLike.ext fun _x => Subtype.ext_iff
#align monoid_hom.ker_cod_restrict MonoidHom.ker_codRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_cod_restrict AddMonoidHom.ker_codRestrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_rangeRestrict (f : G →* N) : ker (rangeRestrict f) = ker f :=
ker_codRestrict _ _ _
#align monoid_hom.ker_range_restrict MonoidHom.ker_rangeRestrict
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_range_restrict AddMonoidHom.ker_rangeRestrict
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_one : (1 : G →* M).ker = ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext fun _x => eq_self_iff_true _
#align monoid_hom.ker_one MonoidHom.ker_one
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_zero AddMonoidHom.ker_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_id : (MonoidHom.id G).ker = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align monoid_hom.ker_id MonoidHom.ker_id
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_id AddMonoidHom.ker_id
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff (f : G →* M) : f.ker = ⊥ ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun h x y hxy => by rwa [eq_iff, h, mem_bot, inv_mul_eq_one, eq_comm] at hxy, fun h =>
bot_unique fun x hx => h (hx.trans f.map_one.symm)⟩
#align monoid_hom.ker_eq_bot_iff MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_eq_bot_iff AddMonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.ker_subtype (H : Subgroup G) : H.subtype.ker = ⊥ :=
H.subtype.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.ker_subtype Subgroup.ker_subtype
#align add_subgroup.ker_subtype AddSubgroup.ker_subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.Subgroup.ker_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : (inclusion h).ker = ⊥ :=
(inclusion h).ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr (Set.inclusion_injective h)
#align subgroup.ker_inclusion Subgroup.ker_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.ker_inclusion AddSubgroup.ker_inclusion
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_prod {M N : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : G →* M) (g : G →* N) :
(f.prod g).ker = f.ker ⊓ g.ker :=
SetLike.ext fun _ => Prod.mk_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
#align monoid_hom.prod_map_comap_prod MonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.sum_map_comap_sum AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
#align monoid_hom.ker_prod_map MonoidHom.ker_prodMap
#align add_monoid_hom.ker_sum_map AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap
@[to_additive]
theorem range_le_ker_iff (f : G →* G') (g : G' →* G'') : f.range ≤ g.ker ↔ g.comp f = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ext fun x => h ⟨x, rfl⟩, by rintro h _ ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact DFunLike.congr_fun h y⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_ker (f : G →* M) : f.ker.Normal :=
⟨fun x hx y => by
rw [mem_ker, map_mul, map_mul, f.mem_ker.1 hx, mul_one, map_mul_eq_one f (mul_inv_self y)]⟩
#align monoid_hom.normal_ker MonoidHom.normal_ker
#align add_monoid_hom.normal_ker AddMonoidHom.normal_ker
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (and_true_iff _).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (true_and_iff _).symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAdditive_ker (f : G →* G') :
(MonoidHom.toAdditive f).ker = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup f.ker := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiplicative_ker {A A' : Type*} [AddGroup A] [AddGroup A'] (f : A →+ A') :
(AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f).ker = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup f.ker := rfl
end Ker
section EqLocus
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M]
/-- The subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x` -/
@[to_additive "The additive subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x`"]
def eqLocus (f g : G →* M) : Subgroup G :=
{ eqLocusM f g with inv_mem' := eq_on_inv f g }
#align monoid_hom.eq_locus MonoidHom.eqLocus
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_locus AddMonoidHom.eqLocus
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eqLocus_same (f : G →* N) : f.eqLocus f = ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext fun _ => eq_self_iff_true _
#align monoid_hom.eq_locus_same MonoidHom.eqLocus_same
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_locus_same AddMonoidHom.eqLocus_same
/-- If two monoid homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subgroup closure. -/
@[to_additive
"If two monoid homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subgroup
closure."]
theorem eqOn_closure {f g : G →* M} {s : Set G} (h : Set.EqOn f g s) : Set.EqOn f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ f.eqLocus g from (closure_le _).2 h
#align monoid_hom.eq_on_closure MonoidHom.eqOn_closure
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_on_closure AddMonoidHom.eqOn_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_eqOn_top {f g : G →* M} (h : Set.EqOn f g (⊤ : Subgroup G)) : f = g :=
ext fun _x => h trivial
#align monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_top MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_top
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_top AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_top
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_eqOn_dense {s : Set G} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : G →* M} (h : s.EqOn f g) : f = g :=
eq_of_eqOn_top <| hs ▸ eqOn_closure h
#align monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_dense MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_dense
#align add_monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_dense AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_dense
end EqLocus
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_preimage_le (f : G →* N) (s : Set N) : closure (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (closure s).comap f :=
(closure_le _).2 fun x hx => by rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap]; exact subset_closure hx
#align monoid_hom.closure_preimage_le MonoidHom.closure_preimage_le
#align add_monoid_hom.closure_preimage_le AddMonoidHom.closure_preimage_le
/-- The image under a monoid homomorphism of the subgroup generated by a set equals the subgroup
generated by the image of the set. -/
@[to_additive
"The image under an `AddMonoid` hom of the `AddSubgroup` generated by a set equals
the `AddSubgroup` generated by the image of the set."]
theorem map_closure (f : G →* N) (s : Set G) : (closure s).map f = closure (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (Subgroup.gc_map_comap f) (Subgroup.gi N).gc
(Subgroup.gi G).gc fun _t => rfl
#align monoid_hom.map_closure MonoidHom.map_closure
#align add_monoid_hom.map_closure AddMonoidHom.map_closure
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map, ←
normalizer_eq_top.2 h]
exact le_normalizer_map _
#align subgroup.normal.map Subgroup.Normal.map
#align add_subgroup.normal.map AddSubgroup.Normal.map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff {f : G →* N} : H.map f = ⊥ ↔ H ≤ f.ker :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_eq_bot
#align subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.map_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
H.map f = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ := by rw [map_eq_bot_iff, f.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr hf, le_bot_iff]
#align subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective Subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective
#align add_subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective AddSubgroup.map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_range (H : Subgroup G) : map f H ≤ f.range :=
(range_eq_map f).symm ▸ map_mono le_top
#align subgroup.map_le_range Subgroup.map_le_range
#align add_subgroup.map_le_range AddSubgroup.map_le_range
@[to_additive]
theorem map_subtype_le {H : Subgroup G} (K : Subgroup H) : K.map H.subtype ≤ H :=
(K.map_le_range H.subtype).trans (le_of_eq H.subtype_range)
#align subgroup.map_subtype_le Subgroup.map_subtype_le
#align add_subgroup.map_subtype_le AddSubgroup.map_subtype_le
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_le_comap (H : Subgroup N) : f.ker ≤ comap f H :=
comap_bot f ▸ comap_mono bot_le
#align subgroup.ker_le_comap Subgroup.ker_le_comap
#align add_subgroup.ker_le_comap AddSubgroup.ker_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_le (H : Subgroup N) : map f (comap f H) ≤ H :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align subgroup.map_comap_le Subgroup.map_comap_le
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_le AddSubgroup.map_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_map (H : Subgroup G) : H ≤ comap f (map f H) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align subgroup.le_comap_map Subgroup.le_comap_map
#align add_subgroup.le_comap_map AddSubgroup.le_comap_map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_eq (H : Subgroup N) : map f (comap f H) = f.range ⊓ H :=
SetLike.ext' <| by
rw [coe_map, coe_comap, Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, coe_inf, coe_range, Set.inter_comm]
#align subgroup.map_comap_eq Subgroup.map_comap_eq
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_eq AddSubgroup.map_comap_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_map_eq (H : Subgroup G) : comap f (map f H) = H ⊔ f.ker := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (sup_le (le_comap_map _ _) (ker_le_comap _ _))
intro x hx; simp only [exists_prop, mem_map, mem_comap] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩
rw [← mul_inv_cancel_left y x]
exact mul_mem_sup hy (by simp [mem_ker, hy'])
#align subgroup.comap_map_eq Subgroup.comap_map_eq
#align add_subgroup.comap_map_eq AddSubgroup.comap_map_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_eq_self {f : G →* N} {H : Subgroup N} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
map f (comap f H) = H := by
rwa [map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
#align subgroup.map_comap_eq_self Subgroup.map_comap_eq_self
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_eq_self AddSubgroup.map_comap_eq_self
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective {f : G →* N} (h : Function.Surjective f) (H : Subgroup N) :
map f (comap f H) = H :=
map_comap_eq_self ((range_top_of_surjective _ h).symm ▸ le_top)
#align subgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective Subgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective AddSubgroup.map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_le_comap_of_le_range {f : G →* N} {K L : Subgroup N} (hf : K ≤ f.range) :
K.comap f ≤ L.comap f ↔ K ≤ L :=
⟨(map_comap_eq_self hf).ge.trans ∘ map_le_iff_le_comap.mpr, comap_mono⟩
#align subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range Subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range
#align add_subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range AddSubgroup.comap_le_comap_of_le_range
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_le_comap_of_surjective {f : G →* N} {K L : Subgroup N} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
K.comap f ≤ L.comap f ↔ K ≤ L :=
comap_le_comap_of_le_range (le_top.trans (f.range_top_of_surjective hf).ge)
#align subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective Subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective
#align add_subgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective AddSubgroup.comap_le_comap_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 2,999 | 3,000 | theorem comap_lt_comap_of_surjective {f : G →* N} {K L : Subgroup N} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
K.comap f < L.comap f ↔ K < L := by | simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, comap_le_comap_of_surjective hf]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetToL1
#align_import measure_theory.integral.bochner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `SetToL1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal * x`.
`weightedSMul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `DominatedFinMeasAdditive`
(defined in the file `SetToL1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `SimpleFunc α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `SimpleFunc.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simpleFunc α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simpleFunc.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `ContinuousLinearMap.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `setToFun` (which are described in the
file `SetToL1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` :
`∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. (In the file `DominatedConvergence`)
`tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `SetIntegral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm`
* `LinearIsometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `Integrable.induction` in the file `SimpleFuncDenseLp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` for a complicated example, which proves
that `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part`
is scattered in sections with the name `posPart`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal <| ‖f a‖)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `isClosed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `isClosed_property` or `DenseRange.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/Integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`MeasureTheory/LpSpace`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/SimpleFuncDense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`MeasureTheory/SetIntegral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Differentiable
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section WeightedSMul
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `fun x => (μ s).toReal • x`. The extension
of that set function through `setToL1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).toReal • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) (x : F) :
weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal • x := by simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_apply MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} :
weightedSMul (0 : Measure α) = (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1; simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_zero_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_empty {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
weightedSMul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_empty MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_empty
theorem weightedSMul_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weightedSMul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul ν s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
rw [Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.toReal_add hμs hνs, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_add_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_add_measure
theorem weightedSMul_smul_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} :
(weightedSMul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.toReal • weightedSMul μ s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, smul_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul_measure
theorem weightedSMul_congr (s t : Set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr 2
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_congr MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_congr
theorem weightedSMul_null {s : Set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 := by
ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply, h_zero]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_null MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_null
theorem weightedSMul_union' (s t : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [add_apply, weightedSMul_apply,
measure_union (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ENNReal.toReal_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union' MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union'
@[nolint unusedArguments]
theorem weightedSMul_union (s t : Set α) (_hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t :=
weightedSMul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union
theorem weightedSMul_smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (c : 𝕜)
(s : Set α) (x : F) : weightedSMul μ s (c • x) = c • weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul
theorem norm_weightedSMul_le (s : Set α) : ‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal :=
calc
‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ = ‖(μ s).toReal‖ * ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F‖ :=
norm_smul (μ s).toReal (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F)
_ ≤ ‖(μ s).toReal‖ :=
((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le)
_ = abs (μ s).toReal := Real.norm_eq_abs _
_ = (μ s).toReal := abs_eq_self.mpr ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.norm_weighted_smul_le MeasureTheory.norm_weightedSMul_le
theorem dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul μ : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weightedSMul_union, fun s _ _ => (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul MeasureTheory.dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 249 | 251 | theorem weightedSMul_nonneg (s : Set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weightedSMul μ s x := by |
simp only [weightedSMul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', _root_.id, coe_id', Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_nonneg toReal_nonneg hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
#align_import data.finset.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Finsets in product types
This file defines finset constructions on the product type `α × β`. Beware not to confuse with the
`Finset.prod` operation which computes the multiplicative product.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.product`: Turns `s : Finset α`, `t : Finset β` into their product in `Finset (α × β)`.
* `Finset.diag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.diag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, a)` with
`a ∈ s`.
* `Finset.offDiag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.offDiag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, b)` with
`a, b ∈ s` and `a ≠ b`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Multiset
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### prod -/
section Prod
variable {s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- `product s t` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset (α × β) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.product t.nodup⟩
#align finset.product Finset.product
instance instSProd : SProd (Finset α) (Finset β) (Finset (α × β)) where
sprod := Finset.product
@[simp]
theorem product_val : (s ×ˢ t).1 = s.1 ×ˢ t.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.product_val Finset.product_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_product {p : α × β} : p ∈ s ×ˢ t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Multiset.mem_product
#align finset.mem_product Finset.mem_product
theorem mk_mem_product (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : (a, b) ∈ s ×ˢ t :=
mem_product.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align finset.mk_mem_product Finset.mk_mem_product
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(↑(s ×ˢ t) : Set (α × β)) = (s : Set α) ×ˢ t :=
Set.ext fun _ => Finset.mem_product
#align finset.coe_product Finset.coe_product
theorem subset_product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst ⊆ s := fun i => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [mem_image]
#align finset.subset_product_image_fst Finset.subset_product_image_fst
theorem subset_product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd ⊆ t := fun i => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [mem_image]
#align finset.subset_product_image_snd Finset.subset_product_image_snd
theorem product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst = s := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
#align finset.product_image_fst Finset.product_image_fst
theorem product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] (ht : s.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd = t := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
#align finset.product_image_snd Finset.product_image_snd
theorem subset_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset (α × β)} :
s ⊆ s.image Prod.fst ×ˢ s.image Prod.snd := fun _ hp =>
mem_product.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
#align finset.subset_product Finset.subset_product
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ h =>
mem_product.2 ⟨hs (mem_product.1 h).1, ht (mem_product.1 h).2⟩
#align finset.product_subset_product Finset.product_subset_product
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_left (hs : s ⊆ s') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t :=
product_subset_product hs (Subset.refl _)
#align finset.product_subset_product_left Finset.product_subset_product_left
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_right (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s ×ˢ t' :=
product_subset_product (Subset.refl _) ht
#align finset.product_subset_product_right Finset.product_subset_product_right
theorem map_swap_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).map ⟨Prod.swap, Prod.swap_injective⟩ = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
#align finset.map_swap_product Finset.map_swap_product
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_product [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).image Prod.swap = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
#align finset.image_swap_product Finset.image_swap_product
theorem product_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = s.biUnion fun a => t.image fun b => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
#align finset.product_eq_bUnion Finset.product_eq_biUnion
theorem product_eq_biUnion_right [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
#align finset.product_eq_bUnion_right Finset.product_eq_biUnion_right
/-- See also `Finset.sup_product_left`. -/
@[simp]
theorem product_biUnion [DecidableEq γ] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (f : α × β → Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).biUnion f = s.biUnion fun a => t.biUnion fun b => f (a, b) := by
classical simp_rw [product_eq_biUnion, biUnion_biUnion, image_biUnion]
#align finset.product_bUnion Finset.product_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem card_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : card (s ×ˢ t) = card s * card t :=
Multiset.card_product _ _
#align finset.card_product Finset.card_product
/-- The product of two Finsets is nontrivial iff both are nonempty
at least one of them is nontrivial. -/
lemma nontrivial_prod_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nontrivial ↔
s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ (s.Nontrivial ∨ t.Nontrivial) := by
simp_rw [← card_pos, ← one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial, card_product]; apply Nat.one_lt_mul_iff
theorem filter_product (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1 ∧ q x.2) = s.filter p ×ˢ t.filter q := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp [mem_filter, mem_product, decide_eq_true_eq, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align finset.filter_product Finset.filter_product
theorem filter_product_left (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1) = s.filter p ×ˢ t := by
simpa using filter_product p fun _ => true
#align finset.filter_product_left Finset.filter_product_left
theorem filter_product_right (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => q x.2) = s ×ˢ t.filter q := by
simpa using filter_product (fun _ : α => true) q
#align finset.filter_product_right Finset.filter_product_right
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Prod.lean | 169 | 185 | theorem filter_product_card (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => (p x.1) = (q x.2)).card =
(s.filter p).card * (t.filter q).card +
(s.filter (¬ p ·)).card * (t.filter (¬ q ·)).card := by |
classical
rw [← card_product, ← card_product, ← filter_product, ← filter_product, ← card_union_of_disjoint]
· apply congr_arg
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp only [filter_union_right, mem_filter, mem_product]
constructor <;> intro h <;> use h.1
· simp only [h.2, Function.comp_apply, Decidable.em, and_self]
· revert h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, and_imp]
rintro _ _ (_|_) <;> simp [*]
· apply Finset.disjoint_filter_filter'
exact (disjoint_compl_right.inf_left _).inf_right _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import number_theory.zsqrtd.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
re : ℤ
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
#align zsqrtd Zsqrtd
#align zsqrtd.ext Zsqrtd.ext_iff
prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
#align zsqrtd.of_int Zsqrtd.ofInt
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.of_int_re Zsqrtd.ofInt_re
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.of_int_im Zsqrtd.ofInt_im
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.zero_re Zsqrtd.zero_re
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.zero_im Zsqrtd.zero_im
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.one_re Zsqrtd.one_re
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.one_im Zsqrtd.one_im
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd Zsqrtd.sqrtd
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd_re Zsqrtd.sqrtd_re
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd_im Zsqrtd.sqrtd_im
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_def Zsqrtd.add_def
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_re Zsqrtd.add_re
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_im Zsqrtd.add_im
#noalign zsqrtd.bit0_re
#noalign zsqrtd.bit0_im
#noalign zsqrtd.bit1_re
#noalign zsqrtd.bit1_im
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.neg_re Zsqrtd.neg_re
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.neg_im Zsqrtd.neg_im
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.mul_re Zsqrtd.mul_re
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.mul_im Zsqrtd.mul_im
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
add_left_neg := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_mk Zsqrtd.star_mk
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_re Zsqrtd.star_re
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_im Zsqrtd.star_im
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive x := Zsqrtd.ext _ _ rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add a b := Zsqrtd.ext _ _ rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, (Zsqrtd.ext_iff 0 1).not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_re Zsqrtd.natCast_re
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_im Zsqrtd.natCast_im
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_val Zsqrtd.natCast_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_re Zsqrtd.intCast_re
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_im Zsqrtd.intCast_im
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_val Zsqrtd.intCast_val
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
#align zsqrtd.of_int_eq_coe Zsqrtd.ofInt_eq_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_nat_re := natCast_re
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_nat_im := natCast_im
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_nat_val := natCast_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_int_re := intCast_re
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_int_im := intCast_im
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_int_val := intCast_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias ofInt_eq_coe := ofInt_eq_intCast
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.smul_val Zsqrtd.smul_val
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
#align zsqrtd.smul_re Zsqrtd.smul_re
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
#align zsqrtd.smul_im Zsqrtd.smul_im
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 315 | 315 | theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by | ext <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.IteratedDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
#align_import analysis.calculus.taylor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3a69562db5a458db8322b190ec8d9a8bbd8a5b14"
/-!
# Taylor's theorem
This file defines the Taylor polynomial of a real function `f : ℝ → E`,
where `E` is a normed vector space over `ℝ` and proves Taylor's theorem,
which states that if `f` is sufficiently smooth, then
`f` can be approximated by the Taylor polynomial up to an explicit error term.
## Main definitions
* `taylorCoeffWithin`: the Taylor coefficient using `iteratedDerivWithin`
* `taylorWithin`: the Taylor polynomial using `iteratedDerivWithin`
## Main statements
* `taylor_mean_remainder`: Taylor's theorem with the general form of the remainder term
* `taylor_mean_remainder_lagrange`: Taylor's theorem with the Lagrange remainder
* `taylor_mean_remainder_cauchy`: Taylor's theorem with the Cauchy remainder
* `exists_taylor_mean_remainder_bound`: Taylor's theorem for vector valued functions with a
polynomial bound on the remainder
## TODO
* the Peano form of the remainder
* the integral form of the remainder
* Generalization to higher dimensions
## Tags
Taylor polynomial, Taylor's theorem
-/
open scoped Interval Topology Nat
open Set
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- The `k`th coefficient of the Taylor polynomial. -/
noncomputable def taylorCoeffWithin (f : ℝ → E) (k : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) : E :=
(k ! : ℝ)⁻¹ • iteratedDerivWithin k f s x₀
#align taylor_coeff_within taylorCoeffWithin
/-- The Taylor polynomial with derivatives inside of a set `s`.
The Taylor polynomial is given by
$$∑_{k=0}^n \frac{(x - x₀)^k}{k!} f^{(k)}(x₀),$$
where $f^{(k)}(x₀)$ denotes the iterated derivative in the set `s`. -/
noncomputable def taylorWithin (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) : PolynomialModule ℝ E :=
(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum fun k =>
PolynomialModule.comp (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C x₀)
(PolynomialModule.single ℝ k (taylorCoeffWithin f k s x₀))
#align taylor_within taylorWithin
/-- The Taylor polynomial with derivatives inside of a set `s` considered as a function `ℝ → E`-/
noncomputable def taylorWithinEval (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) : E :=
PolynomialModule.eval x (taylorWithin f n s x₀)
#align taylor_within_eval taylorWithinEval
theorem taylorWithin_succ (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) :
taylorWithin f (n + 1) s x₀ = taylorWithin f n s x₀ +
PolynomialModule.comp (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C x₀)
(PolynomialModule.single ℝ (n + 1) (taylorCoeffWithin f (n + 1) s x₀)) := by
dsimp only [taylorWithin]
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
#align taylor_within_succ taylorWithin_succ
@[simp]
theorem taylorWithinEval_succ (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) :
taylorWithinEval f (n + 1) s x₀ x = taylorWithinEval f n s x₀ x +
(((n + 1 : ℝ) * n !)⁻¹ * (x - x₀) ^ (n + 1)) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s x₀ := by
simp_rw [taylorWithinEval, taylorWithin_succ, LinearMap.map_add, PolynomialModule.comp_eval]
congr
simp only [Polynomial.eval_sub, Polynomial.eval_X, Polynomial.eval_C,
PolynomialModule.eval_single, mul_inv_rev]
dsimp only [taylorCoeffWithin]
rw [← mul_smul, mul_comm, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mul_inv_rev]
#align taylor_within_eval_succ taylorWithinEval_succ
/-- The Taylor polynomial of order zero evaluates to `f x`. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Taylor.lean | 97 | 102 | theorem taylor_within_zero_eval (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) :
taylorWithinEval f 0 s x₀ x = f x₀ := by |
dsimp only [taylorWithinEval]
dsimp only [taylorWithin]
dsimp only [taylorCoeffWithin]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDenseLp
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
#align_import measure_theory.function.continuous_map_dense from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e0736bb5b48bdadbca19dbd857e12bee38ccfbb8"
/-!
# Approximation in Lᵖ by continuous functions
This file proves that bounded continuous functions are dense in `Lp E p μ`, for `p < ∞`, if the
domain `α` of the functions is a normal topological space and the measure `μ` is weakly regular.
It also proves the same results for approximation by continuous functions with compact support
when the space is locally compact and `μ` is regular.
The result is presented in several versions. First concrete versions giving an approximation
up to `ε` in these various contexts, and then abstract versions stating that the topological
closure of the relevant subgroups of `Lp` are the whole space.
* `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le` states that, in a locally compact
space, an `ℒp` function can be approximated by continuous functions with compact support,
in the sense that `snorm (f - g) p μ` is small.
* `MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_rpow_sub_le`: same result, but expressed in
terms of `∫ ‖f - g‖^p`.
Versions with `Integrable` instead of `Memℒp` are specialized to the case `p = 1`.
Versions with `boundedContinuous` instead of `HasCompactSupport` drop the locally
compact assumption and give only approximation by a bounded continuous function.
* `MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction_dense`: The subgroup
`MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction` of `Lp E p μ`, the additive subgroup of
`Lp E p μ` consisting of equivalence classes containing a continuous representative, is dense in
`Lp E p μ`.
* `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp_denseRange`: For finite-measure `μ`, the continuous linear
map `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp p μ 𝕜` from `α →ᵇ E` to `Lp E p μ` has dense range.
* `ContinuousMap.toLp_denseRange`: For compact `α` and finite-measure `μ`, the continuous linear
map `ContinuousMap.toLp p μ 𝕜` from `C(α, E)` to `Lp E p μ` has dense range.
Note that for `p = ∞` this result is not true: the characteristic function of the set `[0, ∞)` in
`ℝ` cannot be continuously approximated in `L∞`.
The proof is in three steps. First, since simple functions are dense in `Lp`, it suffices to prove
the result for a scalar multiple of a characteristic function of a measurable set `s`. Secondly,
since the measure `μ` is weakly regular, the set `s` can be approximated above by an open set and
below by a closed set. Finally, since the domain `α` is normal, we use Urysohn's lemma to find a
continuous function interpolating between these two sets.
## Related results
Are you looking for a result on "directional" approximation (above or below with respect to an
order) of functions whose codomain is `ℝ≥0∞` or `ℝ`, by semicontinuous functions? See the
Vitali-Carathéodory theorem, in the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/VitaliCaratheodory.lean`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology BoundedContinuousFunction
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace ContinuousMap Set Bornology
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [T4Space α] [BorelSpace α]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {μ : Measure α} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- A variant of Urysohn's lemma, `ℒ^p` version, for an outer regular measure `μ`:
consider two sets `s ⊆ u` which are respectively closed and open with `μ s < ∞`, and a vector `c`.
Then one may find a continuous function `f` equal to `c` on `s` and to `0` outside of `u`,
bounded by `‖c‖` everywhere, and such that the `ℒ^p` norm of `f - s.indicator (fun y ↦ c)` is
arbitrarily small. Additionally, this function `f` belongs to `ℒ^p`. -/
theorem exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed [μ.OuterRegular] (hp : p ≠ ∞) {s u : Set α}
(s_closed : IsClosed s) (u_open : IsOpen u) (hsu : s ⊆ u) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ f : α → E,
Continuous f ∧
snorm (fun x => f x - s.indicator (fun _y => c) x) p μ ≤ ε ∧
(∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖c‖) ∧ Function.support f ⊆ u ∧ Memℒp f p μ := by
obtain ⟨η, η_pos, hη⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _x => c) p μ ≤ ε :=
exists_snorm_indicator_le hp c hε
have ηpos : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < η := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 η_pos
obtain ⟨V, sV, V_open, h'V, hV⟩ : ∃ (V : Set α), V ⊇ s ∧ IsOpen V ∧ μ V < ∞ ∧ μ (V \ s) < η :=
s_closed.measurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt hs ηpos.ne'
let v := u ∩ V
have hsv : s ⊆ v := subset_inter hsu sV
have hμv : μ v < ∞ := (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt h'V
obtain ⟨g, hgv, hgs, hg_range⟩ :=
exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed (u_open.inter V_open).isClosed_compl s_closed
(disjoint_compl_left_iff.2 hsv)
-- Multiply this by `c` to get a continuous approximation to the function `f`; the key point is
-- that this is pointwise bounded by the indicator of the set `v \ s`, which has small measure.
have g_norm : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ = g x := fun x => by rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (hg_range x).1]
have gc_bd0 : ∀ x, ‖g x • c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ := by
intro x
simp only [norm_smul, g_norm x]
apply mul_le_of_le_one_left (norm_nonneg _)
exact (hg_range x).2
have gc_bd :
∀ x, ‖g x • c - s.indicator (fun _x => c) x‖ ≤ ‖(v \ s).indicator (fun _x => c) x‖ := by
intro x
by_cases hv : x ∈ v
· rw [← Set.diff_union_of_subset hsv] at hv
cases' hv with hsv hs
· simpa only [hsv.2, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, sub_zero, hsv,
Set.indicator_of_mem] using gc_bd0 x
· simp [hgs hs, hs]
· simp [hgv hv, show x ∉ s from fun h => hv (hsv h)]
have gc_support : (Function.support fun x : α => g x • c) ⊆ v := by
refine Function.support_subset_iff'.2 fun x hx => ?_
simp only [hgv hx, Pi.zero_apply, zero_smul]
have gc_mem : Memℒp (fun x => g x • c) p μ := by
refine Memℒp.smul_of_top_left (memℒp_top_const _) ?_
refine ⟨g.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have : snorm (v.indicator fun _x => (1 : ℝ)) p μ < ⊤ := by
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, hμv.ne, nnnorm_one, ENNReal.coe_one, one_div, one_mul, Ne,
ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, inv_lt_zero, false_and_iff, or_false_iff, not_and, not_lt,
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
refine (snorm_mono fun x => ?_).trans_lt this
by_cases hx : x ∈ v
· simp only [hx, abs_of_nonneg (hg_range x).1, (hg_range x).2, Real.norm_eq_abs,
indicator_of_mem, CstarRing.norm_one]
· simp only [hgv hx, Pi.zero_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_zero, abs_nonneg]
refine
⟨fun x => g x • c, g.continuous.smul continuous_const, (snorm_mono gc_bd).trans ?_, gc_bd0,
gc_support.trans inter_subset_left, gc_mem⟩
exact hη _ ((measure_mono (diff_subset_diff inter_subset_right Subset.rfl)).trans hV.le)
#align measure_theory.exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed MeasureTheory.exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed
/-- In a locally compact space, any function in `ℒp` can be approximated by compactly supported
continuous functions when `p < ∞`, version in terms of `snorm`. -/
theorem Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
(hp : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → E, HasCompactSupport g ∧ snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g p μ := by
suffices H :
∃ g : α → E, snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g p μ ∧ HasCompactSupport g by
rcases H with ⟨g, hg, g_cont, g_mem, g_support⟩
exact ⟨g, g_support, hg, g_cont, g_mem⟩
-- It suffices to check that the set of functions we consider approximates characteristic
-- functions, is stable under addition and consists of ae strongly measurable functions.
-- First check the latter easy facts.
apply hf.induction_dense hp _ _ _ _ hε
rotate_left
-- stability under addition
· rintro f g ⟨f_cont, f_mem, hf⟩ ⟨g_cont, g_mem, hg⟩
exact ⟨f_cont.add g_cont, f_mem.add g_mem, hf.add hg⟩
-- ae strong measurability
· rintro f ⟨_f_cont, f_mem, _hf⟩
exact f_mem.aestronglyMeasurable
-- We are left with approximating characteristic functions.
-- This follows from `exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed`.
intro c t ht htμ ε hε
rcases exists_Lp_half E μ p hε with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩
obtain ⟨η, ηpos, hη⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _x => c) p μ ≤ δ :=
exists_snorm_indicator_le hp c δpos.ne'
have hη_pos' : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < η := ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ηpos
obtain ⟨s, st, s_compact, μs⟩ : ∃ s, s ⊆ t ∧ IsCompact s ∧ μ (t \ s) < η :=
ht.exists_isCompact_diff_lt htμ.ne hη_pos'.ne'
have hsμ : μ s < ∞ := (measure_mono st).trans_lt htμ
have I1 : snorm ((s.indicator fun _y => c) - t.indicator fun _y => c) p μ ≤ δ := by
rw [← snorm_neg, neg_sub, ← indicator_diff st]
exact hη _ μs.le
obtain ⟨k, k_compact, sk⟩ : ∃ k : Set α, IsCompact k ∧ s ⊆ interior k :=
exists_compact_superset s_compact
rcases exists_continuous_snorm_sub_le_of_closed hp s_compact.isClosed isOpen_interior sk hsμ.ne c
δpos.ne' with
⟨f, f_cont, I2, _f_bound, f_support, f_mem⟩
have I3 : snorm (f - t.indicator fun _y => c) p μ ≤ ε := by
convert
(hδ _ _
(f_mem.aestronglyMeasurable.sub
(aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator s_compact.measurableSet))
((aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator s_compact.measurableSet).sub
(aestronglyMeasurable_const.indicator ht))
I2 I1).le using 2
simp only [sub_add_sub_cancel]
refine ⟨f, I3, f_cont, f_mem, HasCompactSupport.intro k_compact fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← Function.nmem_support]
contrapose! hx
exact interior_subset (f_support hx)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.exists_has_compact_support_snorm_sub_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le
/-- In a locally compact space, any function in `ℒp` can be approximated by compactly supported
continuous functions when `0 < p < ∞`, version in terms of `∫`. -/
theorem Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_rpow_sub_le
[WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
{p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → E,
HasCompactSupport g ∧
(∫ x, ‖f x - g x‖ ^ p ∂μ) ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Memℒp g (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ := by
have I : 0 < ε ^ (1 / p) := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hε _
have A : ENNReal.ofReal (ε ^ (1 / p)) ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, I]
have B : ENNReal.ofReal p ≠ 0 := by simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le] using hp
rcases hf.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le ENNReal.coe_ne_top A with
⟨g, g_support, hg, g_cont, g_mem⟩
change snorm _ (ENNReal.ofReal p) _ ≤ _ at hg
refine ⟨g, g_support, ?_, g_cont, g_mem⟩
rwa [(hf.sub g_mem).snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm B ENNReal.coe_ne_top,
ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff I.le, one_div, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hp.le,
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hε.le (inv_pos.2 hp)] at hg
positivity
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.exists_has_compact_support_integral_rpow_sub_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_rpow_sub_le
/-- In a locally compact space, any integrable function can be approximated by compactly supported
continuous functions, version in terms of `∫⁻`. -/
theorem Integrable.exists_hasCompactSupport_lintegral_sub_le
[WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
{f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → E,
HasCompactSupport g ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖f x - g x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ε ∧ Continuous g ∧ Integrable g μ := by
simp only [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable, ← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm] at hf ⊢
exact hf.exists_hasCompactSupport_snorm_sub_le ENNReal.one_ne_top hε
#align measure_theory.integrable.exists_has_compact_support_lintegral_sub_le MeasureTheory.Integrable.exists_hasCompactSupport_lintegral_sub_le
/-- In a locally compact space, any integrable function can be approximated by compactly supported
continuous functions, version in terms of `∫`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ContinuousMapDense.lean | 226 | 233 | theorem Integrable.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_sub_le
[WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] [μ.Regular]
{f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → E, HasCompactSupport g ∧ (∫ x, ‖f x - g x‖ ∂μ) ≤ ε ∧
Continuous g ∧ Integrable g μ := by |
simp only [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable, ← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, ← ENNReal.ofReal_one]
at hf ⊢
simpa using hf.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_rpow_sub_le zero_lt_one hε
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.rel from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"706d88f2b8fdfeb0b22796433d7a6c1a010af9f2"
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODOs
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop -- deriving CompleteLattice, Inhabited
#align rel Rel
-- Porting note: `deriving` above doesn't work.
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
-- Porting note: required for later theorems.
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
#align rel.inv Rel.inv
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.inv_def Rel.inv_def
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
#align rel.inv_inv Rel.inv_inv
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
#align rel.dom Rel.dom
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
#align rel.dom_mono Rel.dom_mono
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
#align rel.codom Rel.codom
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.codom_inv Rel.codom_inv
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.dom_inv Rel.dom_inv
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
#align rel.comp Rel.comp
-- Porting note: the original `∘` syntax can't be overloaded here, lean considers it ambiguous.
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
#align rel.comp_assoc Rel.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
#align rel.comp_right_id Rel.comp_right_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
#align rel.comp_left_id Rel.comp_left_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_top (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊤ : Rel β γ) = fun x _ ↦ x ∈ r.dom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, dom]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_top (r : Rel α β) : (⊤ : Rel γ α) • r = fun _ y ↦ y ∈ r.codom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, codom]
theorem inv_id : inv (@Eq α) = @Eq α := by
ext x y
constructor <;> apply Eq.symm
#align rel.inv_id Rel.inv_id
theorem inv_comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : inv (r • s) = inv s • inv r := by
ext x z
simp [comp, inv, flip, and_comm]
#align rel.inv_comp Rel.inv_comp
@[simp]
theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Rel α β).inv = (⊥ : Rel β α) := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was `simp [Bot.bot, inv, flip]` -/
simp [Bot.bot, inv, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 161 | 163 | theorem inv_top : (⊤ : Rel α β).inv = (⊤ : Rel β α) := by |
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was `simp [Top.top, inv, flip]` -/
simp [Top.top, inv, Function.flip_def]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DifferentialObject
#align_import algebra.homology.differential_object from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b535c2d5d996acd9b0554b76395d9c920e186f4f"
/-!
# Homological complexes are differential graded objects.
We verify that a `HomologicalComplex` indexed by an `AddCommGroup` is
essentially the same thing as a differential graded object.
This equivalence is probably not particularly useful in practice;
it's here to check that definitions match up as expected.
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
/-!
We first prove some results about differential graded objects.
Porting note: after the port, move these to their own file.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory.DifferentialObject
variable {β : Type*} [AddCommGroup β] {b : β}
variable {V : Type*} [Category V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
variable (X : DifferentialObject ℤ (GradedObjectWithShift b V))
/-- Since `eqToHom` only preserves the fact that `X.X i = X.X j` but not `i = j`, this definition
is used to aid the simplifier. -/
abbrev objEqToHom {i j : β} (h : i = j) :
X.obj i ⟶ X.obj j :=
eqToHom (congr_arg X.obj h)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.differential_object.X_eq_to_hom CategoryTheory.DifferentialObject.objEqToHom
@[simp]
theorem objEqToHom_refl (i : β) : X.objEqToHom (refl i) = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.differential_object.X_eq_to_hom_refl CategoryTheory.DifferentialObject.objEqToHom_refl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/DifferentialObject.lean | 53 | 54 | theorem objEqToHom_d {x y : β} (h : x = y) :
X.objEqToHom h ≫ X.d y = X.d x ≫ X.objEqToHom (by cases h; rfl) := by | cases h; dsimp; simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.ExpChar
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"da420a8c6dd5bdfb85c4ced85c34388f633bc6ff"
/-!
# Ring-theoretic supplement of Algebra.Polynomial.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.isDomain`:
If a ring is an integral domain, then so is its polynomial ring over finitely many variables.
* `Polynomial.isNoetherianRing`:
Hilbert basis theorem, that if a ring is noetherian then so is its polynomial ring.
* `Polynomial.wfDvdMonoid`:
If an integral domain is a `WFDvdMonoid`, then so is its polynomial ring.
* `Polynomial.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`, `MvPolynomial.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`:
If an integral domain is a `UniqueFactorizationMonoid`, then so is its polynomial ring (of any
number of variables).
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
#align polynomial.degree_le Polynomial.degreeLE
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree < `n`. -/
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
#align polynomial.degree_lt Polynomial.degreeLT
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
#align polynomial.mem_degree_le Polynomial.mem_degreeLE
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
#align polynomial.degree_le_mono Polynomial.degreeLE_mono
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.degree_le_eq_span_X_pow Polynomial.degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
#align polynomial.mem_degree_lt Polynomial.mem_degreeLT
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
#align polynomial.degree_lt_mono Polynomial.degreeLT_mono
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.degree_lt_eq_span_X_pow Polynomial.degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow
/-- The first `n` coefficients on `degreeLT n` form a linear equivalence with `Fin n → R`. -/
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
#align polynomial.degree_lt_equiv Polynomial.degreeLTEquiv
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as simp can prove this
theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
rw [LinearEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Submodule.mk_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_lt_equiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero Polynomial.degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero
theorem eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i, degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ i * x ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact (sum_fin _ (by simp_rw [zero_mul, forall_const]) (mem_degreeLT.mp hp)).symm
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum_degree_lt_equiv Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv
theorem degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE {n : ℕ} : degreeLT R (n + 1) = degreeLE R n := by
ext x
by_cases x_zero : x = 0
· simp_rw [x_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [mem_degreeLT, mem_degreeLE, ← natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (by rwa [ne_eq]),
← natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.lt_succ]
/-- For every polynomial `p` in the span of a set `s : Set R[X]`, there exists a polynomial of
`p' ∈ s` with higher degree. See also `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span {s : Set R[X]} {p : R[X]}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hp : p ∈ Submodule.span R s) :
∃ p' ∈ s, degree p ≤ degree p' := by
by_contra! h
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· rw [hp_zero, degree_zero] at h
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_lt_bot (h x hx)
· have : p ∈ degreeLT R (natDegree p) := by
refine (Submodule.span_le.mpr fun p' p'_mem => ?_) hp
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (h p' p'_mem) degree_le_natDegree
rwa [mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot, degree_eq_natDegree hp_zero,
Nat.cast_withBot, lt_self_iff_false] at this
/-- A stronger version of `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span` under the assumption that the
set `s : R[X]` is finite. There exists a polynomial `p' ∈ s` whose degree dominates the degree of
every element of `p ∈ span R s`-/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ p' ∈ s, ∀ (p : R[X]), p ∈ Submodule.span R s → degree p ≤ degree p' := by
rcases Set.Finite.exists_maximal_wrt degree s s_fin hs with ⟨a, has, hmax⟩
refine ⟨a, has, fun p hp => ?_⟩
rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span hs hp with ⟨p', hp'⟩
by_cases h : degree a ≤ degree p'
· rw [← hmax p' hp'.left h] at hp'; exact hp'.right
· exact le_trans hp'.right (not_le.mp h).le
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLE n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_le_degreeLE_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLE R n := by
by_cases s_emp : s.Nonempty
· rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite s_fin s_emp with ⟨p', _, hp'max⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p', fun p hp => mem_degreeLE.mpr ((hp'max _ hp).trans degree_le_natDegree)⟩
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at s_emp
rw [s_emp, Submodule.span_empty]
exact ⟨0, bot_le⟩
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLT n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_of_finite_le_degreeLT {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLT R n := by
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite s_fin with ⟨n, _⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rwa [degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE]⟩
/-- If `R` is a nontrivial ring, the polynomials `R[X]` are not finite as an `R`-module. When `R` is
a field, this is equivalent to `R[X]` being an infinite-dimensional vector space over `R`. -/
theorem not_finite [Nontrivial R] : ¬ Module.Finite R R[X] := by
rw [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_def]
push_neg
intro s hs contra
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite hs with ⟨n,hn⟩
have : ((X : R[X]) ^ (n + 1)) ∈ Polynomial.degreeLE R ↑n := by
rw [contra] at hn
exact hn Submodule.mem_top
rw [mem_degreeLE, degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_le, add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
exact one_ne_zero this
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : R[X]) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image (fun n => p.coeff n) p.support
#align polynomial.frange Polynomial.coeffs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] noncomputable alias frange := coeffs
theorem coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : R[X]) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.frange_zero Polynomial.coeffs_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias frange_zero := coeffs_zero
theorem mem_coeffs_iff {p : R[X]} {c : R} : c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
#align polynomial.mem_frange_iff Polynomial.mem_coeffs_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias mem_frange_iff := mem_coeffs_iff
theorem coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : R[X]) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
simp_rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
#align polynomial.frange_one Polynomial.coeffs_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias frange_one := coeffs_one
theorem coeff_mem_coeffs (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.coeff n ∈ p.coeffs := by
classical
simp only [coeffs, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_image, Ne]
exact ⟨n, h, rfl⟩
#align polynomial.coeff_mem_frange Polynomial.coeff_mem_coeffs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias coeff_mem_frange := coeff_mem_coeffs
theorem geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).comp (X + 1) =
(Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ => (n.choose (i + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ i := by
ext i
trans (n.choose (i + 1) : R); swap
· simp only [finset_sum_coeff, ← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, if_pos rfl]
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [@eq_comm _ i, if_false, eq_self_iff_true,
imp_true_iff]
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt,
Nat.cast_zero, Finset.mem_range, not_lt, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, imp_true_iff]
induction' n with n ih generalizing i
· dsimp; simp only [zero_comp, coeff_zero, Nat.cast_zero]
· simp only [geom_sum_succ', ih, add_comp, X_pow_comp, coeff_add, Nat.choose_succ_succ,
Nat.cast_add, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum Polynomial.geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum
theorem Monic.geom_sum {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.natDegree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn
rw [geom_sum_succ']
refine (hP.pow _).add_of_left ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· simp only [Finset.mem_range, degree_eq_natDegree (hP.pow _).ne_zero]
simp only [Nat.cast_lt, hP.natDegree_pow]
intro k
exact nsmul_lt_nsmul_left hdeg
· rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot]
exact (hP.pow _).ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.geom_sum Polynomial.Monic.geom_sum
theorem Monic.geom_sum' {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic :=
hP.geom_sum (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.2 hdeg) hn
#align polynomial.monic.geom_sum' Polynomial.Monic.geom_sum'
theorem monic_geom_sum_X {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
apply monic_X.geom_sum _ hn
simp only [natDegree_X, zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_geom_sum_X Polynomial.monic_geom_sum_X
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Given a polynomial, return the polynomial whose coefficients are in
the ring closure of the original coefficients. -/
def restriction (p : R[X]) : Polynomial (Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R)) :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ (Subring.closure _).zero_mem
else Subring.subset_closure (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ :
Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R))
#align polynomial.restriction Polynomial.restriction
@[simp]
theorem coeff_restriction {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (restriction p) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [restriction, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_restriction Polynomial.coeff_restriction
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as simp can prove this
theorem coeff_restriction' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (coeff (restriction p) n).1 = coeff p n :=
coeff_restriction
#align polynomial.coeff_restriction' Polynomial.coeff_restriction'
@[simp]
theorem support_restriction (p : R[X]) : support (restriction p) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_restriction]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
#align polynomial.support_restriction Polynomial.support_restriction
@[simp]
theorem map_restriction {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (p : R[X]) :
p.restriction.map (algebraMap _ _) = p :=
ext fun n => by rw [coeff_map, Algebra.algebraMap_ofSubring_apply, coeff_restriction]
#align polynomial.map_restriction Polynomial.map_restriction
@[simp]
theorem degree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
#align polynomial.degree_restriction Polynomial.degree_restriction
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [natDegree]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_restriction Polynomial.natDegree_restriction
@[simp]
theorem monic_restriction {p : R[X]} : Monic (restriction p) ↔ Monic p := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_restriction]
rw [← @coeff_restriction _ _ p]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
#align polynomial.monic_restriction Polynomial.monic_restriction
@[simp]
theorem restriction_zero : restriction (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [restriction, Finset.sum_empty, support_zero]
#align polynomial.restriction_zero Polynomial.restriction_zero
@[simp]
theorem restriction_one : restriction (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by rw [coeff_restriction', coeff_one, coeff_one]; split_ifs <;> rfl
#align polynomial.restriction_one Polynomial.restriction_one
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} {x : S}
theorem eval₂_restriction {p : R[X]} :
eval₂ f x p =
eval₂ (f.comp (Subring.subtype (Subring.closure (p.coeffs : Set R)))) x p.restriction := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, support_restriction, ← @coeff_restriction _ _ p, RingHom.comp_apply,
Subring.coeSubtype]
#align polynomial.eval₂_restriction Polynomial.eval₂_restriction
section ToSubring
variable (p : R[X]) (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial `p` and a subring `T` that contains the coefficients of `p`,
return the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in `T`. -/
def toSubring (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T) : T[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ T.zero_mem else hp (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ : T)
#align polynomial.to_subring Polynomial.toSubring
variable (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_toSubring {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (toSubring p T hp) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [toSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_to_subring Polynomial.coeff_toSubring
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as simp can prove this
theorem coeff_toSubring' {n : ℕ} : (coeff (toSubring p T hp) n).1 = coeff p n :=
coeff_toSubring _ _ hp
#align polynomial.coeff_to_subring' Polynomial.coeff_toSubring'
@[simp]
theorem support_toSubring : support (toSubring p T hp) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
#align polynomial.support_to_subring Polynomial.support_toSubring
@[simp]
theorem degree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
#align polynomial.degree_to_subring Polynomial.degree_toSubring
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).natDegree = p.natDegree := by simp [natDegree]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_to_subring Polynomial.natDegree_toSubring
@[simp]
theorem monic_toSubring : Monic (toSubring p T hp) ↔ Monic p := by
simp_rw [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_toSubring, ← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
#align polynomial.monic_to_subring Polynomial.monic_toSubring
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_zero : toSubring (0 : R[X]) T (by simp [coeffs]) = 0 := by
ext i
simp
#align polynomial.to_subring_zero Polynomial.toSubring_zero
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_one :
toSubring (1 : R[X]) T
(Set.Subset.trans coeffs_one <| Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff.2 T.one_mem) =
1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by
rw [coeff_toSubring', coeff_one, coeff_one, apply_ite Subtype.val, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero,
OneMemClass.coe_one]
#align polynomial.to_subring_one Polynomial.toSubring_one
@[simp]
theorem map_toSubring : (p.toSubring T hp).map (Subring.subtype T) = p := by
ext n
simp [coeff_map]
#align polynomial.map_to_subring Polynomial.map_toSubring
end ToSubring
variable (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial whose coefficients are in some subring, return
the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in the ambient ring. -/
def ofSubring (p : T[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i : R)
#align polynomial.of_subring Polynomial.ofSubring
theorem coeff_ofSubring (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (ofSubring T p) n = (coeff p n : T) := by
simp only [ofSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
ite_eq_right_iff, Ne, ite_not, Classical.not_not, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro h
rw [h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
#align polynomial.coeff_of_subring Polynomial.coeff_ofSubring
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_ofSubring {p : T[X]} : (↑(p.ofSubring T).coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T := by
classical
intro i hi
simp only [coeffs, Set.mem_image, mem_support_iff, Ne, Finset.mem_coe,
(Finset.coe_image)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨n, _, h'n⟩
rw [← h'n, coeff_ofSubring]
exact Subtype.mem (coeff p n : T)
#align polynomial.frange_of_subring Polynomial.coeffs_ofSubring
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias frange_ofSubring := coeffs_ofSubring
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
section ModByMonic
variable {q : R[X]}
theorem mem_ker_modByMonic (hq : q.Monic) {p : R[X]} :
p ∈ LinearMap.ker (modByMonicHom q) ↔ q ∣ p :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans (modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq)
#align polynomial.mem_ker_mod_by_monic Polynomial.mem_ker_modByMonic
@[simp]
theorem ker_modByMonicHom (hq : q.Monic) :
LinearMap.ker (Polynomial.modByMonicHom q) = (Ideal.span {q}).restrictScalars R :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => (mem_ker_modByMonic hq).trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton.symm
#align polynomial.ker_mod_by_monic_hom Polynomial.ker_modByMonicHom
end ModByMonic
end CommRing
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- Transport an ideal of `R[X]` to an `R`-submodule of `R[X]`. -/
def ofPolynomial (I : Ideal R[X]) : Submodule R R[X] where
carrier := I.carrier
zero_mem' := I.zero_mem
add_mem' := I.add_mem
smul_mem' c x H := by
rw [← C_mul']
exact I.mul_mem_left _ H
#align ideal.of_polynomial Ideal.ofPolynomial
variable {I : Ideal R[X]}
theorem mem_ofPolynomial (x) : x ∈ I.ofPolynomial ↔ x ∈ I :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.mem_of_polynomial Ideal.mem_ofPolynomial
variable (I)
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the `R`-submodule of `I`
consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
Polynomial.degreeLE R n ⊓ I.ofPolynomial
#align ideal.degree_le Ideal.degreeLE
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of
leading coefficients of polynomials in `I` with degree ≤ `n`. -/
def leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) : Ideal R :=
(I.degreeLE n).map <| lcoeff R n
#align ideal.leading_coeff_nth Ideal.leadingCoeffNth
/-- Given an ideal `I` in `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of the
leading coefficients in `I`. -/
def leadingCoeff : Ideal R :=
⨆ n : ℕ, I.leadingCoeffNth n
#align ideal.leading_coeff Ideal.leadingCoeff
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S]
/-- If every coefficient of a polynomial is in an ideal `I`, then so is the polynomial itself -/
theorem polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal (I : Ideal R[X]) (p : R[X])
(hp : ∀ n : ℕ, p.coeff n ∈ I.comap (C : R →+* R[X])) : p ∈ I :=
sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p ▸ Submodule.sum_mem I fun n _ => I.mul_mem_right _ (hp n)
#align ideal.polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal Ideal.polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal
/-- The push-forward of an ideal `I` of `R` to `R[X]` via inclusion
is exactly the set of polynomials whose coefficients are in `I` -/
theorem mem_map_C_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R[X]} :
f ∈ (Ideal.map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X]) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, f.coeff n ∈ I := by
constructor
· intro hf
apply @Submodule.span_induction _ _ _ _ _ f _ _ hf
· intro f hf n
cases' (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hf with x hx
rw [← hx.right, coeff_C]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simpa [h] using hx.left
· simp [h]
· simp
· exact fun f g hf hg n => by simp [I.add_mem (hf n) (hg n)]
· refine fun f g hg n => ?_
rw [smul_eq_mul, coeff_mul]
exact I.sum_mem fun c _ => I.mul_mem_left (f.coeff c.fst) (hg c.snd)
· intro hf
rw [← sum_monomial_eq f]
refine (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).sum_mem fun n _ => ?_
simp only [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ne_eq]
rw [mul_comm]
exact (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).mul_mem_left _ (mem_map_of_mem _ (hf n))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.mem_map_C_iff Ideal.mem_map_C_iff
theorem _root_.Polynomial.ker_mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) :
LinearMap.ker (Polynomial.mapRingHom f).toSemilinearMap = f.ker.map (C : R →+* R[X]) := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, RingHom.toSemilinearMap_apply, coe_mapRingHom]
rw [mem_map_C_iff, Polynomial.ext_iff]
simp_rw [RingHom.mem_ker f]
simp
#align polynomial.ker_map_ring_hom Polynomial.ker_mapRingHom
variable (I : Ideal R[X])
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) (x) :
x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth n ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, degree p ≤ n ∧ p.leadingCoeff = x := by
simp only [leadingCoeffNth, degreeLE, Submodule.mem_map, lcoeff_apply, Submodule.mem_inf,
mem_degreeLE]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, ⟨hpdeg, hpI⟩, rfl⟩
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hpdeg with hpdeg | hpdeg
· refine ⟨0, I.zero_mem, bot_le, ?_⟩
rw [leadingCoeff_zero, eq_comm]
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt hpdeg
· refine ⟨p, hpI, le_of_eq hpdeg, ?_⟩
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, hpdeg, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbot'_coe]
· rintro ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
have : natDegree p + (n - natDegree p) = n :=
add_tsub_cancel_of_le (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg)
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - natDegree p), ⟨?_, I.mul_mem_right _ hpI⟩, ?_⟩
· apply le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) _
apply le_trans (add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_X_pow_le _)) _
rw [← Nat.cast_add, this]
· rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow p (n - natDegree p), this]
#align ideal.mem_leading_coeff_nth Ideal.mem_leadingCoeffNth
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth_zero (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth 0 ↔ C x ∈ I :=
(mem_leadingCoeffNth _ _ _).trans
⟨fun ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, hpx⟩ => by
rwa [← hpx, Polynomial.leadingCoeff,
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg), ← eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hpdeg],
fun hx => ⟨C x, hx, degree_C_le, leadingCoeff_C x⟩⟩
#align ideal.mem_leading_coeff_nth_zero Ideal.mem_leadingCoeffNth_zero
theorem leadingCoeffNth_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : I.leadingCoeffNth m ≤ I.leadingCoeffNth n := by
intro r hr
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_leadingCoeffNth] at hr ⊢
rcases hr with ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - m), I.mul_mem_right _ hpI, ?_, leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow⟩
refine le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) ?_
refine le_trans (add_le_add hpdeg (degree_X_pow_le _)) ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le H]
#align ideal.leading_coeff_nth_mono Ideal.leadingCoeffNth_mono
theorem mem_leadingCoeff (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeff ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, Polynomial.leadingCoeff p = x := by
rw [leadingCoeff, Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed]
· simp only [mem_leadingCoeffNth]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, p, hpI, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p, p, hpI, degree_le_natDegree, rfl⟩
intro i j
exact
⟨i + j, I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_right _ _),
I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩
#align ideal.mem_leading_coeff Ideal.mem_leadingCoeff
/-- If `I` is an ideal, and `pᵢ` is a finite family of polynomials each satisfying
`∀ k, (pᵢ)ₖ ∈ Iⁿⁱ⁻ᵏ` for some `nᵢ`, then `p = ∏ pᵢ` also satisfies `∀ k, pₖ ∈ Iⁿ⁻ᵏ` with `n = ∑ nᵢ`.
-/
theorem _root_.Polynomial.coeff_prod_mem_ideal_pow_tsub {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X])
(I : Ideal R) (n : ι → ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ (k), (f i).coeff k ∈ I ^ (n i - k)) (k : ℕ) :
(s.prod f).coeff k ∈ I ^ (s.sum n - k) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s ha hs generalizing k
· rw [sum_empty, prod_empty, coeff_one, zero_tsub, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· rw [sum_insert ha, prod_insert ha, coeff_mul]
apply sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ e
obtain rfl : i + j = k := mem_antidiagonal.mp e
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right add_tsub_add_le_tsub_add_tsub
rw [pow_add]
exact
Ideal.mul_mem_mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inl rfl) _)
(hs (fun i hi k => h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inr hi) _) j)
#align polynomial.coeff_prod_mem_ideal_pow_tsub Polynomial.coeff_prod_mem_ideal_pow_tsub
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- `R[X]` is never a field for any ring `R`. -/
theorem polynomial_not_isField : ¬IsField R[X] := by
nontriviality R
intro hR
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel X_ne_zero
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one hp
have := degree_lt_degree_mul_X hp0
rw [← X_mul, congr_arg degree hp, degree_one, Nat.WithBot.lt_zero_iff, degree_eq_bot] at this
exact hp0 this
#align ideal.polynomial_not_is_field Ideal.polynomial_not_isField
/-- The only constant in a maximal ideal over a field is `0`. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_constant_mem_of_maximal (hR : IsField R) (I : Ideal R[X]) [hI : I.IsMaximal]
(x : R) (hx : C x ∈ I) : x = 0 := by
refine Classical.by_contradiction fun hx0 => hI.ne_top ((eq_top_iff_one I).2 ?_)
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel hx0
convert I.mul_mem_left (C y) hx
rw [← C.map_mul, hR.mul_comm y x, hy, RingHom.map_one]
#align ideal.eq_zero_of_constant_mem_of_maximal Ideal.eq_zero_of_constant_mem_of_maximal
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime (P : Ideal R) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) ↔ IsPrime P := by
-- Note: the following proof avoids quotient rings
-- It can be golfed substantially by using something like
-- `(Quotient.isDomain_iff_prime (map C P : Ideal R[X]))`
constructor
· intro H
have := comap_isPrime C (map C P)
convert this using 1
ext x
simp only [mem_comap, mem_map_C_iff]
constructor
· rintro h (- | n)
· rwa [coeff_C_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro h
simpa only [coeff_C_zero] using h 0
· intro h
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_top_iff_one, mem_map_C_iff, not_forall]
use 0
rw [coeff_one_zero, ← eq_top_iff_one]
exact h.1
· intro f g
simp only [mem_map_C_iff]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
classical
let m := Nat.find hf
let n := Nat.find hg
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.insert_erase ((Finset.mem_antidiagonal (a := (m,n))).mpr rfl),
Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _), (P.add_mem_iff_left _).not]
· apply mt h.2
rw [not_or]
exact ⟨Nat.find_spec hf, Nat.find_spec hg⟩
apply P.sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_antidiagonal] at hij
simp only [Ne, Prod.mk.inj_iff, not_and_or] at hij
obtain hi | hj : i < m ∨ j < n := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, not_lt, le_iff_lt_or_eq]
rintro (hmi | rfl)
· rw [← not_le]
intro hnj
exact (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hmi hnj).ne hij.2.symm
· simp only [eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_or_iff, add_right_inj,
not_and_self_iff] at hij
· rw [mul_comm]
apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hf hi)
· apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hg hj)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.is_prime_map_C_iff_is_prime Ideal.isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime {P : Ideal R} (H : IsPrime P) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) :=
(isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime P).mpr H
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.is_prime_map_C_of_is_prime Ideal.isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime
theorem is_fg_degreeLE [IsNoetherianRing R] (I : Ideal R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
Submodule.FG (I.degreeLE n) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
isNoetherian_submodule_left.1
(isNoetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ ⟨_, degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow.symm⟩) _
#align ideal.is_fg_degree_le Ideal.is_fg_degreeLE
end CommRing
end Ideal
variable {σ : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
section Prime
variable (σ) {r : R}
namespace Polynomial
theorem prime_C_iff : Prime (C r) ↔ Prime r :=
⟨comap_prime C (evalRingHom (0 : R)) fun r => eval_C, fun hr => by
have := hr.1
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_prime] at hr ⊢
· rw [← Set.image_singleton, ← Ideal.map_span]
apply Ideal.isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime hr
· intro h; apply (this (C_eq_zero.mp h))
· assumption⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.prime_C_iff Polynomial.prime_C_iff
end Polynomial
namespace MvPolynomial
private theorem prime_C_iff_of_fintype {R : Type u} (σ : Type v) {r : R} [CommRing R] [Fintype σ] :
Prime (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ Prime r := by
rw [(renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin σ)).toMulEquiv.prime_iff]
convert_to Prime (C r) ↔ _
· congr!
apply rename_C
· symm
induction' Fintype.card σ with d hd
· exact (isEmptyAlgEquiv R (Fin 0)).toMulEquiv.symm.prime_iff
· rw [hd, ← Polynomial.prime_C_iff]
convert (finSuccEquiv R d).toMulEquiv.symm.prime_iff (p := Polynomial.C (C r))
rw [← finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C]; rfl
theorem prime_C_iff : Prime (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ Prime r :=
⟨comap_prime C constantCoeff (constantCoeff_C _), fun hr =>
⟨fun h => hr.1 <| by
rw [← C_inj, h]
simp,
fun h =>
hr.2.1 <| by
rw [← constantCoeff_C _ r]
exact h.map _,
fun a b hd => by
obtain ⟨s, a', b', rfl, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename₂ a b
rw [← algebraMap_eq] at hd
have : algebraMap R _ r ∣ a' * b' := by
convert killCompl Subtype.coe_injective |>.toRingHom.map_dvd hd <;> simp
rw [← rename_C ((↑) : s → σ)]
let f := (rename (R := R) ((↑) : s → σ)).toRingHom
exact (((prime_C_iff_of_fintype s).2 hr).2.2 a' b' this).imp f.map_dvd f.map_dvd⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.prime_C_iff MvPolynomial.prime_C_iff
variable {σ}
theorem prime_rename_iff (s : Set σ) {p : MvPolynomial s R} :
Prime (rename ((↑) : s → σ) p) ↔ Prime (p : MvPolynomial s R) := by
classical
symm
let eqv :=
(sumAlgEquiv R (↥sᶜ) s).symm.trans
(renameEquiv R <| (Equiv.sumComm (↥sᶜ) s).trans <| Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
have : (rename (↑)).toRingHom = eqv.toAlgHom.toRingHom.comp C := by
apply ringHom_ext
· intro
simp only [eqv, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, rename_C,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp,
AlgEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv_symm_apply,
iterToSum_C_C, renameEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.sumComm_apply]
· intro
simp only [eqv, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, rename_X,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp,
AlgEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv_symm_apply,
iterToSum_C_X, renameEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.sumComm_apply, Sum.swap_inr,
Equiv.Set.sumCompl_apply_inl]
apply_fun (· p) at this
simp_rw [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe] at this
rw [← prime_C_iff, eqv.toMulEquiv.prime_iff, this]
simp only [MulEquiv.coe_mk, AlgEquiv.toEquiv_eq_coe, EquivLike.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.trans_apply,
MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv_symm_apply, renameEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.sumComm_apply,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.coe_coe,
AlgEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply]
#align mv_polynomial.prime_rename_iff MvPolynomial.prime_rename_iff
end MvPolynomial
end Prime
namespace Polynomial
instance (priority := 100) wfDvdMonoid {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [WfDvdMonoid R] :
WfDvdMonoid R[X] where
wellFounded_dvdNotUnit := by
classical
refine
RelHomClass.wellFounded
(⟨fun p : R[X] =>
((if p = 0 then ⊤ else ↑p.degree : WithTop (WithBot ℕ)), p.leadingCoeff), ?_⟩ :
DvdNotUnit →r Prod.Lex (· < ·) DvdNotUnit)
(wellFounded_lt.prod_lex ‹WfDvdMonoid R›.wellFounded_dvdNotUnit)
rintro a b ⟨ane0, ⟨c, ⟨not_unit_c, rfl⟩⟩⟩
dsimp
rw [Polynomial.degree_mul, if_neg ane0]
split_ifs with hac
· rw [hac, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_zero]
apply Prod.Lex.left
exact lt_of_le_of_ne le_top WithTop.coe_ne_top
have cne0 : c ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul hac
simp only [cne0, ane0, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul]
by_cases hdeg : c.degree = 0
· simp only [hdeg, add_zero]
refine Prod.Lex.right _ ⟨?_, ⟨c.leadingCoeff, fun unit_c => not_unit_c ?_, rfl⟩⟩
· rwa [Ne, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
rw [Polynomial.isUnit_iff, Polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg]
use c.leadingCoeff, unit_c
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hdeg]; rfl
· apply Prod.Lex.left
rw [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree cne0] at *
rw [WithTop.coe_lt_coe, Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree ane0, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_lt]
exact lt_add_of_pos_right _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun h => hdeg (h.symm ▸ WithBot.coe_zero))
end Polynomial
/-- Hilbert basis theorem: a polynomial ring over a noetherian ring is a noetherian ring. -/
protected theorem Polynomial.isNoetherianRing [inst : IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing R[X] :=
isNoetherianRing_iff.2
⟨fun I : Ideal R[X] =>
let M :=
WellFounded.min (isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.1 (by infer_instance))
(Set.range I.leadingCoeffNth) ⟨_, ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
have hm : M ∈ Set.range I.leadingCoeffNth := WellFounded.min_mem _ _ _
let ⟨N, HN⟩ := hm
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := I.is_fg_degreeLE N
have hm2 : ∀ k, I.leadingCoeffNth k ≤ M := fun k =>
Or.casesOn (le_or_lt k N) (fun h => HN ▸ I.leadingCoeffNth_mono h) fun h x hx =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hxm =>
haveI : IsNoetherian R R := inst
have : ¬M < I.leadingCoeffNth k := by
refine WellFounded.not_lt_min (wellFounded_submodule_gt R R) _ _ ?_; exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
this ⟨HN ▸ I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (le_of_lt h), fun H => hxm (H hx)⟩
have hs2 : ∀ {x}, x ∈ I.degreeLE N → x ∈ Ideal.span (↑s : Set R[X]) :=
hs ▸ fun hx =>
Submodule.span_induction hx (fun _ hx => Ideal.subset_span hx) (Ideal.zero_mem _)
(fun _ _ => Ideal.add_mem _) fun c f hf => f.C_mul' c ▸ Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hf
⟨s, le_antisymm (Ideal.span_le.2 fun x hx =>
have : x ∈ I.degreeLE N := hs ▸ Submodule.subset_span hx
this.2) <| by
have : Submodule.span R[X] ↑s = Ideal.span ↑s := rfl
rw [this]
intro p hp
generalize hn : p.natDegree = k
induction' k using Nat.strong_induction_on with k ih generalizing p
rcases le_or_lt k N with h | h
· subst k
refine hs2 ⟨Polynomial.mem_degreeLE.2
(le_trans Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 h), hp⟩
· have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
cases hn
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ h
have : (0 : R) ≠ 1 := by
intro h
apply hp0
ext i
refine (mul_one _).symm.trans ?_
rw [← h, mul_zero]
rfl
haveI : Nontrivial R := ⟨⟨0, 1, this⟩⟩
have : p.leadingCoeff ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth N := by
rw [HN]
exact hm2 k ((I.mem_leadingCoeffNth _ _).2
⟨_, hp, hn ▸ Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree, rfl⟩)
rw [I.mem_leadingCoeffNth] at this
rcases this with ⟨q, hq, hdq, hlqp⟩
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := by
intro H
rw [← Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at H
rw [hlqp, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at H
exact hp0 H
have h1 : p.degree = (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree)).degree := by
rw [Polynomial.degree_mul', Polynomial.degree_X_pow]
· rw [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hq0]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le, hn]
· refine le_trans (Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_degree_le hdq) (le_of_lt h)
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow, mul_one]
exact mt Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hq0
have h2 : p.leadingCoeff = (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree)).leadingCoeff := by
rw [← hlqp, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow]
have := Polynomial.degree_sub_lt h1 hp0 h2
rw [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hp0] at this
rw [← sub_add_cancel p (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree))]
convert (Ideal.span ↑s).add_mem _ ((Ideal.span (s : Set R[X])).mul_mem_right _ _)
· by_cases hpq : p - q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree) = 0
· rw [hpq]
exact Ideal.zero_mem _
refine ih _ ?_ (I.sub_mem hp (I.mul_mem_right _ hq)) rfl
rwa [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hpq, Nat.cast_lt, hn] at this
exact hs2 ⟨Polynomial.mem_degreeLE.2 hdq, hq⟩⟩⟩
#align polynomial.is_noetherian_ring Polynomial.isNoetherianRing
attribute [instance] Polynomial.isNoetherianRing
namespace Polynomial
theorem exists_irreducible_of_degree_pos {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [WfDvdMonoid R]
{f : R[X]} (hf : 0 < f.degree) : ∃ g, Irreducible g ∧ g ∣ f :=
WfDvdMonoid.exists_irreducible_factor (fun huf => ne_of_gt hf <| degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit huf)
fun hf0 => not_lt_of_lt hf <| hf0.symm ▸ (@degree_zero R _).symm ▸ WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
#align polynomial.exists_irreducible_of_degree_pos Polynomial.exists_irreducible_of_degree_pos
theorem exists_irreducible_of_natDegree_pos {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [WfDvdMonoid R]
{f : R[X]} (hf : 0 < f.natDegree) : ∃ g, Irreducible g ∧ g ∣ f :=
exists_irreducible_of_degree_pos <| by
contrapose! hf
exact natDegree_le_of_degree_le hf
#align polynomial.exists_irreducible_of_nat_degree_pos Polynomial.exists_irreducible_of_natDegree_pos
theorem exists_irreducible_of_natDegree_ne_zero {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[WfDvdMonoid R] {f : R[X]} (hf : f.natDegree ≠ 0) : ∃ g, Irreducible g ∧ g ∣ f :=
exists_irreducible_of_natDegree_pos <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hf
#align polynomial.exists_irreducible_of_nat_degree_ne_zero Polynomial.exists_irreducible_of_natDegree_ne_zero
theorem linearIndependent_powers_iff_aeval (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v : M) :
(LinearIndependent R fun n : ℕ => (f ^ n) v) ↔ ∀ p : R[X], aeval f p v = 0 → p = 0 := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff]
simp only [Finsupp.total_apply, aeval_endomorphism, forall_iff_forall_finsupp, Sum, support,
coeff, ofFinsupp_eq_zero]
exact Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.linear_independent_powers_iff_aeval Polynomial.linearIndependent_powers_iff_aeval
attribute [-instance] Ring.toNonAssocRing
theorem disjoint_ker_aeval_of_coprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]} (hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
Disjoint (LinearMap.ker (aeval f p)) (LinearMap.ker (aeval f q)) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
intro v hv
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
simpa [LinearMap.mem_ker.1 (Submodule.mem_inf.1 hv).1,
LinearMap.mem_ker.1 (Submodule.mem_inf.1 hv).2] using
congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'.symm
#align polynomial.disjoint_ker_aeval_of_coprime Polynomial.disjoint_ker_aeval_of_coprime
theorem sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_coprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]} (hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
LinearMap.range (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.range (aeval f q) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
intro v _
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
use aeval f (p * p') v
use LinearMap.mem_range.2 ⟨aeval f p' v, by simp only [LinearMap.mul_apply, aeval_mul]⟩
use aeval f (q * q') v
use LinearMap.mem_range.2 ⟨aeval f q' v, by simp only [LinearMap.mul_apply, aeval_mul]⟩
simpa only [mul_comm p p', mul_comm q q', aeval_one, aeval_add] using
congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'
#align polynomial.sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_coprime Polynomial.sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_coprime
theorem sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul {f : M →ₗ[R] M} {p q : R[X]} :
LinearMap.ker (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.ker (aeval f q) ≤ LinearMap.ker (aeval f (p * q)) := by
intro v hv
rcases Submodule.mem_sup.1 hv with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
have h_eval_x : aeval f (p * q) x = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm, aeval_mul, LinearMap.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hx, LinearMap.map_zero]
have h_eval_y : aeval f (p * q) y = 0 := by
rw [aeval_mul, LinearMap.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hy, LinearMap.map_zero]
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker, ← hxy, LinearMap.map_add, h_eval_x, h_eval_y, add_zero]
#align polynomial.sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul Polynomial.sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 1,096 | 1,119 | theorem sup_ker_aeval_eq_ker_aeval_mul_of_coprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]}
(hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
LinearMap.ker (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.ker (aeval f q) = LinearMap.ker (aeval f (p * q)) := by |
apply le_antisymm sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul
intro v hv
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
have h_eval₂_qpp' :=
calc
aeval f (q * (p * p')) v = aeval f (p' * (p * q)) v := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm q p]
_ = 0 := by rw [aeval_mul, LinearMap.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hv, LinearMap.map_zero]
have h_eval₂_pqq' :=
calc
aeval f (p * (q * q')) v = aeval f (q' * (p * q)) v := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm]
_ = 0 := by rw [aeval_mul, LinearMap.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hv, LinearMap.map_zero]
rw [aeval_mul] at h_eval₂_qpp' h_eval₂_pqq'
refine
⟨aeval f (q * q') v, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 h_eval₂_pqq', aeval f (p * p') v,
LinearMap.mem_ker.1 h_eval₂_qpp', ?_⟩
rw [add_comm, mul_comm p p', mul_comm q q']
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, aeval_one] using congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
#align_import topology.separation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
/-!
# Separation properties of topological spaces.
This file defines the predicate `SeparatedNhds`, and common separation axioms
(under the Kolmogorov classification).
## Main definitions
* `SeparatedNhds`: Two `Set`s are separated by neighbourhoods if they are contained in disjoint
open sets.
* `T0Space`: A T₀/Kolmogorov space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is an open set that contains one, but not the other.
* `R0Space`: An R₀ space (sometimes called a *symmetric space*) is a topological space
such that the `Specializes` relation is symmetric.
* `T1Space`: A T₁/Fréchet space is a space where every singleton set is closed.
This is equivalent to, for every pair `x ≠ y`, there existing an open set containing `x`
but not `y` (`t1Space_iff_exists_open` shows that these conditions are equivalent.)
T₁ implies T₀ and R₀.
* `R1Space`: An R₁/preregular space is a space where any two topologically distinguishable points
have disjoint neighbourhoods. R₁ implies R₀.
* `T2Space`: A T₂/Hausdorff space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is two disjoint open sets, one containing `x`, and the other `y`. T₂ implies T₁ and R₁.
* `T25Space`: A T₂.₅/Urysohn space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is two open sets, one containing `x`, and the other `y`, whose closures are disjoint.
T₂.₅ implies T₂.
* `RegularSpace`: A regular space is one where, given any closed `C` and `x ∉ C`,
there are disjoint open sets containing `x` and `C` respectively. Such a space is not necessarily
Hausdorff.
* `T3Space`: A T₃ space is a regular T₀ space. T₃ implies T₂.₅.
* `NormalSpace`: A normal space, is one where given two disjoint closed sets,
we can find two open sets that separate them. Such a space is not necessarily Hausdorff, even if
it is T₀.
* `T4Space`: A T₄ space is a normal T₁ space. T₄ implies T₃.
* `CompletelyNormalSpace`: A completely normal space is one in which for any two sets `s`, `t`
such that if both `closure s` is disjoint with `t`, and `s` is disjoint with `closure t`,
then there exist disjoint neighbourhoods of `s` and `t`. `Embedding.completelyNormalSpace` allows
us to conclude that this is equivalent to all subspaces being normal. Such a space is not
necessarily Hausdorff or regular, even if it is T₀.
* `T5Space`: A T₅ space is a completely normal T₁ space. T₅ implies T₄.
Note that `mathlib` adopts the modern convention that `m ≤ n` if and only if `T_m → T_n`, but
occasionally the literature swaps definitions for e.g. T₃ and regular.
## Main results
### T₀ spaces
* `IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton`: Given a closed set `S` in a compact T₀ space,
there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is closed.
* `exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite`: Given an open finite set `S` in a T₀ space,
there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is open.
### T₁ spaces
* `isClosedMap_const`: The constant map is a closed map.
* `discrete_of_t1_of_finite`: A finite T₁ space must have the discrete topology.
### T₂ spaces
* `t2_iff_nhds`: A space is T₂ iff the neighbourhoods of distinct points generate the bottom filter.
* `t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal`: A space is T₂ iff the `diagonal` of `X` (that is, the set of all
points of the form `(a, a) : X × X`) is closed under the product topology.
* `separatedNhds_of_finset_finset`: Any two disjoint finsets are `SeparatedNhds`.
* Most topological constructions preserve Hausdorffness;
these results are part of the typeclass inference system (e.g. `Embedding.t2Space`)
* `Set.EqOn.closure`: If two functions are equal on some set `s`, they are equal on its closure.
* `IsCompact.isClosed`: All compact sets are closed.
* `WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace.locallyCompactSpace`: If a topological space is both
weakly locally compact (i.e., each point has a compact neighbourhood)
and is T₂, then it is locally compact.
* `totallySeparatedSpace_of_t1_of_basis_clopen`: If `X` has a clopen basis, then
it is a `TotallySeparatedSpace`.
* `loc_compact_t2_tot_disc_iff_tot_sep`: A locally compact T₂ space is totally disconnected iff
it is totally separated.
* `t2Quotient`: the largest T2 quotient of a given topological space.
If the space is also compact:
* `normalOfCompactT2`: A compact T₂ space is a `NormalSpace`.
* `connectedComponent_eq_iInter_isClopen`: The connected component of a point
is the intersection of all its clopen neighbourhoods.
* `compact_t2_tot_disc_iff_tot_sep`: Being a `TotallyDisconnectedSpace`
is equivalent to being a `TotallySeparatedSpace`.
* `ConnectedComponents.t2`: `ConnectedComponents X` is T₂ for `X` T₂ and compact.
### T₃ spaces
* `disjoint_nested_nhds`: Given two points `x ≠ y`, we can find neighbourhoods `x ∈ V₁ ⊆ U₁` and
`y ∈ V₂ ⊆ U₂`, with the `Vₖ` closed and the `Uₖ` open, such that the `Uₖ` are disjoint.
## References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_axiom
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
section Separation
/--
`SeparatedNhds` is a predicate on pairs of sub`Set`s of a topological space. It holds if the two
sub`Set`s are contained in disjoint open sets.
-/
def SeparatedNhds : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun s t : Set X =>
∃ U V : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ IsOpen V ∧ s ⊆ U ∧ t ⊆ V ∧ Disjoint U V
#align separated_nhds SeparatedNhds
theorem separatedNhds_iff_disjoint {s t : Set X} : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝ˢ t) := by
simp only [(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).disjoint_iff (hasBasis_nhdsSet t), SeparatedNhds, exists_prop, ←
exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align separated_nhds_iff_disjoint separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
alias ⟨SeparatedNhds.disjoint_nhdsSet, _⟩ := separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
namespace SeparatedNhds
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set X}
@[symm]
theorem symm : SeparatedNhds s t → SeparatedNhds t s := fun ⟨U, V, oU, oV, aU, bV, UV⟩ =>
⟨V, U, oV, oU, bV, aU, Disjoint.symm UV⟩
#align separated_nhds.symm SeparatedNhds.symm
theorem comm (s t : Set X) : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ SeparatedNhds t s :=
⟨symm, symm⟩
#align separated_nhds.comm SeparatedNhds.comm
theorem preimage [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y} {s t : Set Y} (h : SeparatedNhds s t)
(hf : Continuous f) : SeparatedNhds (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
let ⟨U, V, oU, oV, sU, tV, UV⟩ := h
⟨f ⁻¹' U, f ⁻¹' V, oU.preimage hf, oV.preimage hf, preimage_mono sU, preimage_mono tV,
UV.preimage f⟩
#align separated_nhds.preimage SeparatedNhds.preimage
protected theorem disjoint (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint s t :=
let ⟨_, _, _, _, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h; hd.mono hsU htV
#align separated_nhds.disjoint SeparatedNhds.disjoint
theorem disjoint_closure_left (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint (closure s) t :=
let ⟨_U, _V, _, hV, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h
(hd.closure_left hV).mono (closure_mono hsU) htV
#align separated_nhds.disjoint_closure_left SeparatedNhds.disjoint_closure_left
theorem disjoint_closure_right (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint s (closure t) :=
h.symm.disjoint_closure_left.symm
#align separated_nhds.disjoint_closure_right SeparatedNhds.disjoint_closure_right
@[simp] theorem empty_right (s : Set X) : SeparatedNhds s ∅ :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, isOpen_empty, fun a _ => mem_univ a, Subset.rfl, disjoint_empty _⟩
#align separated_nhds.empty_right SeparatedNhds.empty_right
@[simp] theorem empty_left (s : Set X) : SeparatedNhds ∅ s :=
(empty_right _).symm
#align separated_nhds.empty_left SeparatedNhds.empty_left
theorem mono (h : SeparatedNhds s₂ t₂) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : SeparatedNhds s₁ t₁ :=
let ⟨U, V, hU, hV, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h
⟨U, V, hU, hV, hs.trans hsU, ht.trans htV, hd⟩
#align separated_nhds.mono SeparatedNhds.mono
theorem union_left : SeparatedNhds s u → SeparatedNhds t u → SeparatedNhds (s ∪ t) u := by
simpa only [separatedNhds_iff_disjoint, nhdsSet_union, disjoint_sup_left] using And.intro
#align separated_nhds.union_left SeparatedNhds.union_left
theorem union_right (ht : SeparatedNhds s t) (hu : SeparatedNhds s u) : SeparatedNhds s (t ∪ u) :=
(ht.symm.union_left hu.symm).symm
#align separated_nhds.union_right SeparatedNhds.union_right
end SeparatedNhds
/-- A T₀ space, also known as a Kolmogorov space, is a topological space such that for every pair
`x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing one but not the other. We formulate the definition in terms
of the `Inseparable` relation. -/
class T0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- Two inseparable points in a T₀ space are equal. -/
t0 : ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, Inseparable x y → x = y
#align t0_space T0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y → x = y :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align t0_space_iff_inseparable t0Space_iff_inseparable
theorem t0Space_iff_not_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ¬Inseparable x y := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_inseparable, Ne, not_imp_not, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_not_inseparable t0Space_iff_not_inseparable
theorem Inseparable.eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : Inseparable x y) : x = y :=
T0Space.t0 h
#align inseparable.eq Inseparable.eq
/-- A topology `Inducing` map from a T₀ space is injective. -/
protected theorem Inducing.injective [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Injective f := fun _ _ h =>
(hf.inseparable_iff.1 <| .of_eq h).eq
#align inducing.injective Inducing.injective
/-- A topology `Inducing` map from a T₀ space is a topological embedding. -/
protected theorem Inducing.embedding [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Embedding f :=
⟨hf, hf.injective⟩
#align inducing.embedding Inducing.embedding
lemma embedding_iff_inducing [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y} :
Embedding f ↔ Inducing f :=
⟨Embedding.toInducing, Inducing.embedding⟩
#align embedding_iff_inducing embedding_iff_inducing
theorem t0Space_iff_nhds_injective (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
t0Space_iff_inseparable X
#align t0_space_iff_nhds_injective t0Space_iff_nhds_injective
theorem nhds_injective [T0Space X] : Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
(t0Space_iff_nhds_injective X).1 ‹_›
#align nhds_injective nhds_injective
theorem inseparable_iff_eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ x = y :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align inseparable_iff_eq inseparable_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhds_eq_nhds_iff [T0Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a = 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align nhds_eq_nhds_iff nhds_eq_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem inseparable_eq_eq [T0Space X] : Inseparable = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext inseparable_iff_eq
#align inseparable_eq_eq inseparable_eq_eq
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.inseparable_iff {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
⟨fun h s hs ↦ inseparable_iff_forall_open.1 h _ (hb.isOpen hs),
fun h ↦ hb.nhds_hasBasis.eq_of_same_basis <| by
convert hb.nhds_hasBasis using 2
exact and_congr_right (h _)⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.eq_iff [T0Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : x = y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
inseparable_iff_eq.symm.trans hb.inseparable_iff
theorem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, xor_iff_not_iff, not_forall, exists_prop,
inseparable_iff_forall_open, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_exists_is_open_xor_mem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
theorem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) :=
(t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem X).1 ‹_› h
#align exists_is_open_xor_mem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
/-- Specialization forms a partial order on a t0 topological space. -/
def specializationOrder (X) [TopologicalSpace X] [T0Space X] : PartialOrder X :=
{ specializationPreorder X, PartialOrder.lift (OrderDual.toDual ∘ 𝓝) nhds_injective with }
#align specialization_order specializationOrder
instance SeparationQuotient.instT0Space : T0Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
⟨fun x y => Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y fun _ _ h =>
SeparationQuotient.mk_eq_mk.2 <| SeparationQuotient.inducing_mk.inseparable_iff.1 h⟩
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· refine this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s \ U = s := hmin (s \ U) diff_subset ⟨y, hy, hyU⟩ (hs.sdiff hUo)
exact (this.symm.subset hx).2 hxU
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2
⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton
/-- Given a closed set `S` in a compact T₀ space, there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is
closed. -/
theorem IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton [T0Space X] [CompactSpace X] {S : Set X}
(hS : IsClosed S) (hne : S.Nonempty) : ∃ x : X, x ∈ S ∧ IsClosed ({x} : Set X) := by
obtain ⟨V, Vsub, Vne, Vcls, hV⟩ := hS.exists_minimal_nonempty_closed_subset hne
rcases minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton Vcls Vne hV with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, Vsub (mem_singleton x), Vcls⟩
#align is_closed.exists_closed_singleton IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· exact this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s ∩ U = s := hmin (s ∩ U) inter_subset_left ⟨x, hx, hxU⟩ (hs.inter hUo)
exact hyU (this.symm.subset hy).2
#align minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2 ⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton
/-- Given an open finite set `S` in a T₀ space, there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is open. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hfin : s.Finite)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (ho : IsOpen s) : ∃ x ∈ s, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
lift s to Finset X using hfin
induction' s using Finset.strongInductionOn with s ihs
rcases em (∃ t, t ⊂ s ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ IsOpen (t : Set X)) with (⟨t, hts, htne, hto⟩ | ht)
· rcases ihs t hts htne hto with ⟨x, hxt, hxo⟩
exact ⟨x, hts.1 hxt, hxo⟩
· -- Porting note: was `rcases minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne _ with ⟨x, hx⟩`
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/116
rsuffices ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, s.toSet = {x}
· exact ⟨x, hx.symm ▸ rfl, hx ▸ ho⟩
refine minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne ?_
refine fun t hts htne hto => of_not_not fun hts' => ht ?_
lift t to Finset X using s.finite_toSet.subset hts
exact ⟨t, ssubset_iff_subset_ne.2 ⟨hts, mt Finset.coe_inj.2 hts'⟩, htne, hto⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_open_finite exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_finite [T0Space X] [Finite X] [Nonempty X] :
∃ x : X, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) :=
let ⟨x, _, h⟩ := exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite (Set.toFinite _)
univ_nonempty isOpen_univ
⟨x, h⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_fintype exists_open_singleton_of_finite
theorem t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T0Space Y] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => hf <| (h.map hf').eq⟩
#align t0_space_of_injective_of_continuous t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T0Space X :=
t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t0_space Embedding.t0Space
instance Subtype.t0Space [T0Space X] {p : X → Prop} : T0Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t0Space
#align subtype.t0_space Subtype.t0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun a b : X => a ∉ closure ({b} : Set X) ∨ b ∉ closure ({a} : Set X) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, inseparable_iff_mem_closure, not_and_or]
#align t0_space_iff_or_not_mem_closure t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure
instance Prod.instT0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] [T0Space Y] : T0Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => Prod.ext (h.map continuous_fst).eq (h.map continuous_snd).eq⟩
instance Pi.instT0Space {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, T0Space (X i)] :
T0Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => funext fun i => (h.map (continuous_apply i)).eq⟩
#align pi.t0_space Pi.instT0Space
instance ULift.instT0Space [T0Space X] : T0Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t0Space
theorem T0Space.of_cover (h : ∀ x y, Inseparable x y → ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s ∧ T0Space s) :
T0Space X := by
refine ⟨fun x y hxy => ?_⟩
rcases h x y hxy with ⟨s, hxs, hys, hs⟩
lift x to s using hxs; lift y to s using hys
rw [← subtype_inseparable_iff] at hxy
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hxy.eq
#align t0_space.of_cover T0Space.of_cover
theorem T0Space.of_open_cover (h : ∀ x, ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s ∧ T0Space s) : T0Space X :=
T0Space.of_cover fun x _ hxy =>
let ⟨s, hxs, hso, hs⟩ := h x
⟨s, hxs, (hxy.mem_open_iff hso).1 hxs, hs⟩
#align t0_space.of_open_cover T0Space.of_open_cover
/-- A topological space is called an R₀ space, if `Specializes` relation is symmetric.
In other words, given two points `x y : X`,
if every neighborhood of `y` contains `x`, then every neighborhood of `x` contains `y`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class R0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In an R₀ space, the `Specializes` relation is symmetric. -/
specializes_symmetric : Symmetric (Specializes : X → X → Prop)
export R0Space (specializes_symmetric)
section R0Space
variable [R0Space X] {x y : X}
/-- In an R₀ space, the `Specializes` relation is symmetric, dot notation version. -/
theorem Specializes.symm (h : x ⤳ y) : y ⤳ x := specializes_symmetric h
#align specializes.symm Specializes.symm
/-- In an R₀ space, the `Specializes` relation is symmetric, `Iff` version. -/
theorem specializes_comm : x ⤳ y ↔ y ⤳ x := ⟨Specializes.symm, Specializes.symm⟩
#align specializes_comm specializes_comm
/-- In an R₀ space, `Specializes` is equivalent to `Inseparable`. -/
theorem specializes_iff_inseparable : x ⤳ y ↔ Inseparable x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.antisymm h.symm, Inseparable.specializes⟩
#align specializes_iff_inseparable specializes_iff_inseparable
/-- In an R₀ space, `Specializes` implies `Inseparable`. -/
alias ⟨Specializes.inseparable, _⟩ := specializes_iff_inseparable
theorem Inducing.r0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X} (hf : Inducing f) : R0Space Y where
specializes_symmetric a b := by
simpa only [← hf.specializes_iff] using Specializes.symm
instance {p : X → Prop} : R0Space {x // p x} := inducing_subtype_val.r0Space
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [R0Space Y] : R0Space (X × Y) where
specializes_symmetric _ _ h := h.fst.symm.prod h.snd.symm
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, R0Space (X i)] :
R0Space (∀ i, X i) where
specializes_symmetric _ _ h := specializes_pi.2 fun i ↦ (specializes_pi.1 h i).symm
/-- In an R₀ space, the closure of a singleton is a compact set. -/
theorem isCompact_closure_singleton : IsCompact (closure {x}) := by
refine isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hxU ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ U i := mem_iUnion.1 <| hxU <| subset_closure rfl
refine ⟨{i}, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← specializes_iff_mem_closure, specializes_comm] at hy
simpa using hy.mem_open (hUo i) hi
theorem Filter.coclosedCompact_le_cofinite : coclosedCompact X ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem.2 fun _ ↦
compl_mem_coclosedCompact.2 isCompact_closure_singleton
#align filter.coclosed_compact_le_cofinite Filter.coclosedCompact_le_cofinite
variable (X)
/-- In an R₀ space, relatively compact sets form a bornology.
Its cobounded filter is `Filter.coclosedCompact`.
See also `Bornology.inCompact` the bornology of sets contained in a compact set. -/
def Bornology.relativelyCompact : Bornology X where
cobounded' := Filter.coclosedCompact X
le_cofinite' := Filter.coclosedCompact_le_cofinite
#align bornology.relatively_compact Bornology.relativelyCompact
variable {X}
theorem Bornology.relativelyCompact.isBounded_iff {s : Set X} :
@Bornology.IsBounded _ (Bornology.relativelyCompact X) s ↔ IsCompact (closure s) :=
compl_mem_coclosedCompact
#align bornology.relatively_compact.is_bounded_iff Bornology.relativelyCompact.isBounded_iff
/-- In an R₀ space, the closure of a finite set is a compact set. -/
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_closure {s : Set X} (hs : s.Finite) : IsCompact (closure s) :=
let _ : Bornology X := .relativelyCompact X
Bornology.relativelyCompact.isBounded_iff.1 hs.isBounded
end R0Space
/-- A T₁ space, also known as a Fréchet space, is a topological space
where every singleton set is closed. Equivalently, for every pair
`x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing `x` and not `y`. -/
class T1Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- A singleton in a T₁ space is a closed set. -/
t1 : ∀ x, IsClosed ({x} : Set X)
#align t1_space T1Space
theorem isClosed_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsClosed ({x} : Set X) :=
T1Space.t1 x
#align is_closed_singleton isClosed_singleton
theorem isOpen_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen ({x}ᶜ : Set X) :=
isClosed_singleton.isOpen_compl
#align is_open_compl_singleton isOpen_compl_singleton
theorem isOpen_ne [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen { y | y ≠ x } :=
isOpen_compl_singleton
#align is_open_ne isOpen_ne
@[to_additive]
theorem Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport [T1Space X] [One X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X}
(hf : Continuous f) : IsOpen (mulSupport f) :=
isOpen_ne.preimage hf
#align continuous.is_open_mul_support Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport
#align continuous.is_open_support Continuous.isOpen_support
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x = 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ne.nhdsWithin_eq h
#align ne.nhds_within_compl_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) (s : Set X) :
𝓝[s \ {y}] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [diff_eq, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds h)
#align ne.nhds_within_diff_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton
lemma nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_le [T1Space X] (x y : X) : 𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x ≤ 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl|hy
· exact Eq.le rfl
· rw [Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton hy]
exact nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
IsOpen { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≠] x, p y } := by
refine isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.mpr fun a ha => ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.mpr ha] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | h
· exact hb
· rw [h.symm.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton] at hb
exact hb.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds_within isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin
protected theorem Set.Finite.isClosed [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : Set.Finite s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s]
exact hs.isClosed_biUnion fun i _ => isClosed_singleton
#align set.finite.is_closed Set.Finite.isClosed
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne [T1Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ a ∈ b, x ∈ a ∧ y ∉ a := by
rcases hb.isOpen_iff.1 isOpen_ne x h with ⟨a, ab, xa, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ab, xa, fun h => ha h rfl⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_mem_of_ne TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne
protected theorem Finset.isClosed [T1Space X] (s : Finset X) : IsClosed (s : Set X) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed
#align finset.is_closed Finset.isClosed
theorem t1Space_TFAE (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
List.TFAE [T1Space X,
∀ x, IsClosed ({ x } : Set X),
∀ x, IsOpen ({ x }ᶜ : Set X),
Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → {y}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, y ∉ s,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2
· exact ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
tfae_have 2 ↔ 3
· simp only [isOpen_compl_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 3
· refine forall_swap.trans ?_
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 6
· simp only [← subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_mem_subset_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 7
· simp only [(nhds_basis_opens _).mem_iff, subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc,
and_left_comm]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 8
· simp only [← principal_singleton, disjoint_principal_right]
tfae_have 8 ↔ 9
· exact forall_swap.trans (by simp only [disjoint_comm, ne_comm])
tfae_have 1 → 4
· simp only [continuous_def, CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff']
rintro H s (rfl | hs)
exacts [isOpen_empty, compl_compl s ▸ (@Set.Finite.isClosed _ _ H _ hs).isOpen_compl]
tfae_have 4 → 2
· exact fun h x => (CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff.2 <| Or.inr (finite_singleton _)).preimage h
tfae_have 2 ↔ 10
· simp only [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed, specializes_iff_mem_closure, subset_def,
mem_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
#align t1_space_tfae t1Space_TFAE
theorem t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of : T1Space X ↔ Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 3
#align t1_space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of
theorem CofiniteTopology.continuous_of [T1Space X] : Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mp ‹_›
#align cofinite_topology.continuous_of CofiniteTopology.continuous_of
theorem t1Space_iff_exists_open :
T1Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 6
#align t1_space_iff_exists_open t1Space_iff_exists_open
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 8
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 7
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 9
#align t1_space_iff_specializes_imp_eq t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq
theorem disjoint_pure_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_pure_nhds disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem disjoint_nhds_pure [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_nhds_pure disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem Specializes.eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ⤳ y) : x = y :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.1 ‹_› h
#align specializes.eq Specializes.eq
theorem specializes_iff_eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} : x ⤳ y ↔ x = y :=
⟨Specializes.eq, fun h => h ▸ specializes_rfl⟩
#align specializes_iff_eq specializes_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem specializes_eq_eq [T1Space X] : (· ⤳ ·) = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext specializes_iff_eq
#align specializes_eq_eq specializes_eq_eq
@[simp]
theorem pure_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : pure a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_pure.symm.trans specializes_iff_eq
#align pure_le_nhds_iff pure_le_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhds_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_eq
#align nhds_le_nhds_iff nhds_le_nhds_iff
instance (priority := 100) [T1Space X] : R0Space X where
specializes_symmetric _ _ := by rw [specializes_iff_eq, specializes_iff_eq]; exact Eq.symm
instance : T1Space (CofiniteTopology X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mpr continuous_id
theorem t1Space_antitone : Antitone (@T1Space X) := fun a _ h _ =>
@T1Space.mk _ a fun x => (T1Space.t1 x).mono h
#align t1_space_antitone t1Space_antitone
theorem continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Function.update f x y) s x' ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x' :=
EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt
(mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| mem_of_superset (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hne) fun _y' hy' =>
Function.update_noteq hy' _ _)
(Function.update_noteq hne _ _)
#align continuous_within_at_update_of_ne continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
{f : X → Y} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousAt (Function.update f x y) x' ↔ ContinuousAt f x' := by
simp only [← continuousWithinAt_univ, continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hne]
#align continuous_at_update_of_ne continuousAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousOn_update_iff [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x : X} {y : Y} :
ContinuousOn (Function.update f x y) s ↔
ContinuousOn f (s \ {x}) ∧ (x ∈ s → Tendsto f (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 y)) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, ← and_forall_ne x, and_comm]
refine and_congr ⟨fun H z hz => ?_, fun H z hzx hzs => ?_⟩ (forall_congr' fun _ => ?_)
· specialize H z hz.2 hz.1
rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hz.2] at H
exact H.mono diff_subset
· rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hzx]
refine (H z ⟨hzs, hzx⟩).mono_of_mem (inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ ?_)
exact isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hzx
· exact continuousWithinAt_update_same
#align continuous_on_update_iff continuousOn_update_iff
theorem t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T1Space Y] : T1Space X :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.2 fun _ _ h => hf (h.map hf').eq
#align t1_space_of_injective_of_continuous t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t1Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T1Space X :=
t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t1_space Embedding.t1Space
instance Subtype.t1Space {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
T1Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t1Space
#align subtype.t1_space Subtype.t1Space
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space X] [T1Space Y] : T1Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b⟩ => @singleton_prod_singleton _ _ a b ▸ isClosed_singleton.prod isClosed_singleton⟩
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, T1Space (X i)] :
T1Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun f => univ_pi_singleton f ▸ isClosed_set_pi fun _ _ => isClosed_singleton⟩
instance ULift.instT1Space [T1Space X] : T1Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t1Space
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) TotallyDisconnectedSpace.t1Space [h: TotallyDisconnectedSpace X] :
T1Space X := by
rw [((t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 1 :)]
intro x
rw [← totallyDisconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent_singleton.mp h x]
exact isClosed_connectedComponent
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T1Space.t0Space [T1Space X] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => h.specializes.eq⟩
#align t1_space.t0_space T1Space.t0Space
@[simp]
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {x y : X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y ↔ y ≠ x :=
isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds_iff
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : y ≠ x) : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y :=
compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff.mpr h
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds compl_singleton_mem_nhds
@[simp]
theorem closure_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : closure ({x} : Set X) = {x} :=
isClosed_singleton.closure_eq
#align closure_singleton closure_singleton
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: the proof was `hs.induction_on (by simp) fun x => by simp`
theorem Set.Subsingleton.closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : s.Subsingleton) :
(closure s).Subsingleton := by
rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) <;> simp
#align set.subsingleton.closure Set.Subsingleton.closure
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} : (closure s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨fun h => h.anti subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
#align subsingleton_closure subsingleton_closure
theorem isClosedMap_const {X Y} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {y : Y} :
IsClosedMap (Function.const X y) :=
IsClosedMap.of_nonempty fun s _ h2s => by simp_rw [const, h2s.image_const, isClosed_singleton]
#align is_closed_map_const isClosedMap_const
theorem nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s : Set X} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
𝓝[insert y s] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
refine le_antisymm (Filter.le_def.2 fun t ht => ?_) (nhdsWithin_mono x <| subset_insert y s)
obtain ⟨o, ho, hxo, host⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht
refine mem_nhdsWithin.mpr ⟨o \ {y}, ho.sdiff isClosed_singleton, ⟨hxo, hxy⟩, ?_⟩
rw [inter_insert_of_not_mem <| not_mem_diff_of_mem (mem_singleton y)]
exact (inter_subset_inter diff_subset Subset.rfl).trans host
#align nhds_within_insert_of_ne nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne
/-- If `t` is a subset of `s`, except for one point,
then `insert x s` is a neighborhood of `x` within `t`. -/
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s t : Set X}
(hu : t ⊆ insert y s) : insert x s ∈ 𝓝[t] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hu
refine nhdsWithin_mono x hu ?_
rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h]
exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (subset_insert x s)
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_of_subset_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert
@[simp]
theorem ker_nhds [T1Space X] (x : X) : (𝓝 x).ker = {x} := by
simp [ker_nhds_eq_specializes]
theorem biInter_basis_nhds [T1Space X] {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} {x : X}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : ⋂ (i) (_ : p i), s i = {x} := by
rw [← h.ker, ker_nhds]
#align bInter_basis_nhds biInter_basis_nhds
@[simp]
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff [T1Space X] {x : X} {s : Set X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝ˢ s ↔ x ∉ s := by
rw [isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhdsSet, subset_compl_singleton_iff]
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds_set_iff compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_le_iff [T1Space X] {s t : Set X} : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => monotone_nhdsSet h⟩
simp_rw [Filter.le_def]; intro h x hx
specialize h {x}ᶜ
simp_rw [compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff] at h
by_contra hxt
exact h hxt hx
#align nhds_set_le_iff nhdsSet_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_inj_iff [T1Space X] {s t : Set X} : 𝓝ˢ s = 𝓝ˢ t ↔ s = t := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff]
exact and_congr nhdsSet_le_iff nhdsSet_le_iff
#align nhds_set_inj_iff nhdsSet_inj_iff
theorem injective_nhdsSet [T1Space X] : Function.Injective (𝓝ˢ : Set X → Filter X) := fun _ _ hst =>
nhdsSet_inj_iff.mp hst
#align injective_nhds_set injective_nhdsSet
theorem strictMono_nhdsSet [T1Space X] : StrictMono (𝓝ˢ : Set X → Filter X) :=
monotone_nhdsSet.strictMono_of_injective injective_nhdsSet
#align strict_mono_nhds_set strictMono_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhds_le_nhdsSet_iff [T1Space X] {s : Set X} {x : X} : 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [← nhdsSet_singleton, nhdsSet_le_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
#align nhds_le_nhds_set_iff nhds_le_nhdsSet_iff
/-- Removing a non-isolated point from a dense set, one still obtains a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.diff_singleton [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s) (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] :
Dense (s \ {x}) :=
hs.inter_of_isOpen_right (dense_compl_singleton x) isOpen_compl_singleton
#align dense.diff_singleton Dense.diff_singleton
/-- Removing a finset from a dense set in a space without isolated points, one still
obtains a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.diff_finset [T1Space X] [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s)
(t : Finset X) : Dense (s \ t) := by
induction t using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simpa using hs
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.coe_insert, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff]
exact ih.diff_singleton _
#align dense.diff_finset Dense.diff_finset
/-- Removing a finite set from a dense set in a space without isolated points, one still
obtains a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.diff_finite [T1Space X] [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s)
{t : Set X} (ht : t.Finite) : Dense (s \ t) := by
convert hs.diff_finset ht.toFinset
exact (Finite.coe_toFinset _).symm
#align dense.diff_finite Dense.diff_finite
/-- If a function to a `T1Space` tends to some limit `y` at some point `x`, then necessarily
`y = f x`. -/
theorem eq_of_tendsto_nhds [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)) : f x = y :=
by_contra fun hfa : f x ≠ y =>
have fact₁ : {f x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y := compl_singleton_mem_nhds hfa.symm
have fact₂ : Tendsto f (pure x) (𝓝 y) := h.comp (tendsto_id'.2 <| pure_le_nhds x)
fact₂ fact₁ (Eq.refl <| f x)
#align eq_of_tendsto_nhds eq_of_tendsto_nhds
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {g : X → Y}
{l : Filter X} {b₁ b₂ : Y} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b₁)) (hb : b₁ ≠ b₂) : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ≠ b₂ :=
hg.eventually (isOpen_compl_singleton.eventually_mem hb)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_ne Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne
theorem ContinuousAt.eventually_ne [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {g : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hg1 : ContinuousAt g x) (hg2 : g x ≠ y) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, g z ≠ y :=
hg1.tendsto.eventually_ne hg2
#align continuous_at.eventually_ne ContinuousAt.eventually_ne
theorem eventually_ne_nhds [T1Space X] {a b : X} (h : a ≠ b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≠ b :=
IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne h
theorem eventually_ne_nhdsWithin [T1Space X] {a b : X} {s : Set X} (h : a ≠ b) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ≠ b :=
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| eventually_ne_nhds h
/-- To prove a function to a `T1Space` is continuous at some point `x`, it suffices to prove that
`f` admits *some* limit at `x`. -/
theorem continuousAt_of_tendsto_nhds [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)) : ContinuousAt f x := by
rwa [ContinuousAt, eq_of_tendsto_nhds h]
#align continuous_at_of_tendsto_nhds continuousAt_of_tendsto_nhds
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_const_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {l : Filter Y} [NeBot l] {c d : X} :
Tendsto (fun _ => c) l (𝓝 d) ↔ c = d := by simp_rw [Tendsto, Filter.map_const, pure_le_nhds_iff]
#align tendsto_const_nhds_iff tendsto_const_nhds_iff
/-- A point with a finite neighborhood has to be isolated. -/
theorem isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds [T1Space X] (x : X)
{s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hsf : s.Finite) : IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
have A : {x} ⊆ s := by simp only [singleton_subset_iff, mem_of_mem_nhds hs]
have B : IsClosed (s \ {x}) := (hsf.subset diff_subset).isClosed
have C : (s \ {x})ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x := B.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds fun h => h.2 rfl
have D : {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by simpa only [← diff_eq, diff_diff_cancel_left A] using inter_mem hs C
rwa [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← singleton_subset_iff, subset_interior_iff_isOpen] at D
#align is_open_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds
/-- If the punctured neighborhoods of a point form a nontrivial filter, then any neighborhood is
infinite. -/
theorem infinite_of_mem_nhds {X} [TopologicalSpace X] [T1Space X] (x : X) [hx : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)]
{s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : Set.Infinite s := by
refine fun hsf => hx.1 ?_
rw [← isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds]
exact isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds x hs hsf
#align infinite_of_mem_nhds infinite_of_mem_nhds
theorem discrete_of_t1_of_finite [T1Space X] [Finite X] :
DiscreteTopology X := by
apply singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp
intro x
rw [← isClosed_compl_iff]
exact (Set.toFinite _).isClosed
#align discrete_of_t1_of_finite discrete_of_t1_of_finite
theorem PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete [PreconnectedSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] :
Subsingleton X := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton]
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [Ne, ← mem_singleton_iff, (isClopen_discrete _).eq_univ <| singleton_nonempty y] at hxy
exact hxy (mem_univ x)
#align preconnected_space.trivial_of_discrete PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete
theorem IsPreconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (h : IsPreconnected s)
(hs : s.Nontrivial) : s.Infinite := by
refine mt (fun hf => (subsingleton_coe s).mp ?_) (not_subsingleton_iff.mpr hs)
haveI := @discrete_of_t1_of_finite s _ _ hf.to_subtype
exact @PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace h) _
#align is_preconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial IsPreconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial
theorem ConnectedSpace.infinite [ConnectedSpace X] [Nontrivial X] [T1Space X] : Infinite X :=
infinite_univ_iff.mp <| isPreconnected_univ.infinite_of_nontrivial nontrivial_univ
#align connected_space.infinite ConnectedSpace.infinite
/-- A non-trivial connected T1 space has no isolated points. -/
instance (priority := 100) ConnectedSpace.neBot_nhdsWithin_compl_of_nontrivial_of_t1space
[ConnectedSpace X] [Nontrivial X] [T1Space X] (x : X) :
NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
by_contra contra
rw [not_neBot, ← isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds] at contra
replace contra := nonempty_inter isOpen_compl_singleton
contra (compl_union_self _) (Set.nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial _) (singleton_nonempty _)
simp [compl_inter_self {x}] at contra
theorem SeparationQuotient.t1Space_iff : T1Space (SeparationQuotient X) ↔ R0Space X := by
rw [r0Space_iff, ((t1Space_TFAE (SeparationQuotient X)).out 0 9 :)]
constructor
· intro h x y xspecy
rw [← Inducing.specializes_iff inducing_mk, h xspecy] at *
· rintro h ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ sxspecsy
have xspecy : x ⤳ y := (Inducing.specializes_iff inducing_mk).mp sxspecsy
have yspecx : y ⤳ x := h xspecy
erw [mk_eq_mk, inseparable_iff_specializes_and]
exact ⟨xspecy, yspecx⟩
theorem singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : {x} ∈ 𝓝[s] x := by
have : ({⟨x, hx⟩} : Set s) ∈ 𝓝 (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) := by simp [nhds_discrete]
simpa only [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe hx, image_singleton] using
@image_mem_map _ _ _ ((↑) : s → X) _ this
#align singleton_mem_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
/-- The neighbourhoods filter of `x` within `s`, under the discrete topology, is equal to
the pure `x` filter (which is the principal filter at the singleton `{x}`.) -/
theorem nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] x = pure x :=
le_antisymm (le_pure_iff.2 <| singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete hx) (pure_le_nhdsWithin hx)
#align nhds_within_of_mem_discrete nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
theorem Filter.HasBasis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop}
{t : ι → Set X} {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hb : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p t)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ i, p i ∧ t i ∩ s = {x} := by
rcases (nhdsWithin_hasBasis hb s).mem_iff.1 (singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete hx) with
⟨i, hi, hix⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, hix.antisymm <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds <| hb.mem_of_mem hi, hx⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete Filter.HasBasis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
/-- A point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space admits a neighbourhood
that only meets `s` at `x`. -/
theorem nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, U ∩ s = {x} := by
simpa using (𝓝 x).basis_sets.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
/-- Let `x` be a point in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space, then there exists an open
set that only meets `s` at `x`. -/
theorem isOpen_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ U ∩ s = {x} := by
obtain ⟨U, hU_nhds, hU_inter⟩ := nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
obtain ⟨t, ht_sub, ht_open, ht_x⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hU_nhds
refine ⟨t, ht_open, Set.Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· exact hU_inter ▸ Set.inter_subset_inter_left s ht_sub
· rw [Set.subset_inter_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨ht_x, hx⟩
/-- For point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space, there is a set `U`
such that
1. `U` is a punctured neighborhood of `x` (ie. `U ∪ {x}` is a neighbourhood of `x`),
2. `U` is disjoint from `s`.
-/
theorem disjoint_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ U ∈ 𝓝[≠] x, Disjoint U s :=
let ⟨V, h, h'⟩ := nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
⟨{x}ᶜ ∩ V, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ h,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (by rw [inter_assoc, h', compl_inter_self])⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete disjoint_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
/-- Let `X` be a topological space and let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets. If there is an inclusion
`t ⊆ s`, then the topological space structure on `t` induced by `X` is the same as the one
obtained by the induced topological space structure on `s`. Use `embedding_inclusion` instead. -/
@[deprecated embedding_inclusion (since := "2023-02-02")]
theorem TopologicalSpace.subset_trans {s t : Set X} (ts : t ⊆ s) :
(instTopologicalSpaceSubtype : TopologicalSpace t) =
(instTopologicalSpaceSubtype : TopologicalSpace s).induced (Set.inclusion ts) :=
(embedding_inclusion ts).induced
#align topological_space.subset_trans TopologicalSpace.subset_trans
/-! ### R₁ (preregular) spaces -/
section R1Space
/-- A topological space is called a *preregular* (a.k.a. R₁) space,
if any two topologically distinguishable points have disjoint neighbourhoods. -/
@[mk_iff r1Space_iff_specializes_or_disjoint_nhds]
class R1Space (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
specializes_or_disjoint_nhds (x y : X) : Specializes x y ∨ Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)
export R1Space (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds)
variable [R1Space X] {x y : X}
instance (priority := 100) : R0Space X where
specializes_symmetric _ _ h := (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds _ _).resolve_right <| fun hd ↦
h.not_disjoint hd.symm
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ¬x ⤳ y :=
⟨fun hd hspec ↦ hspec.not_disjoint hd, (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds _ _).resolve_left⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes
theorem specializes_iff_not_disjoint : x ⤳ y ↔ ¬Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes.not_left.symm
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ¬Inseparable x y := by
rw [disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes, specializes_iff_inseparable]
theorem r1Space_iff_inseparable_or_disjoint_nhds {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]:
R1Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y ∨ Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
⟨fun _h x y ↦ (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds x y).imp_left Specializes.inseparable, fun h ↦
⟨fun x y ↦ (h x y).imp_left Inseparable.specializes⟩⟩
theorem isClosed_setOf_specializes : IsClosed { p : X × X | p.1 ⤳ p.2 } := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_setOf, ← disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes,
isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds]
#align is_closed_set_of_specializes isClosed_setOf_specializes
theorem isClosed_setOf_inseparable : IsClosed { p : X × X | Inseparable p.1 p.2 } := by
simp only [← specializes_iff_inseparable, isClosed_setOf_specializes]
#align is_closed_set_of_inseparable isClosed_setOf_inseparable
/-- In an R₁ space, a point belongs to the closure of a compact set `K`
if and only if it is topologically inseparable from some point of `K`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_closure_iff_exists_inseparable {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
y ∈ closure K ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, Inseparable x y := by
refine ⟨fun hy ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hxK, hxy⟩ ↦
(hxy.mem_closed_iff isClosed_closure).1 <| subset_closure hxK⟩
contrapose! hy
have : Disjoint (𝓝 y) (𝓝ˢ K) := hK.disjoint_nhdsSet_right.2 fun x hx ↦
(disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable.2 (hy x hx)).symm
simpa only [disjoint_iff, not_mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_eq_bot]
using this.mono_right principal_le_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.closure_eq_biUnion_inseparable {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
closure K = ⋃ x ∈ K, {y | Inseparable x y} := by
ext; simp [hK.mem_closure_iff_exists_inseparable]
/-- In an R₁ space, the closure of a compact set is the union of the closures of its points. -/
theorem IsCompact.closure_eq_biUnion_closure_singleton {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
closure K = ⋃ x ∈ K, closure {x} := by
simp only [hK.closure_eq_biUnion_inseparable, ← specializes_iff_inseparable,
specializes_iff_mem_closure, setOf_mem_eq]
/-- In an R₁ space, if a compact set `K` is contained in an open set `U`,
then its closure is also contained in `U`. -/
theorem IsCompact.closure_subset_of_isOpen {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K)
{U : Set X} (hU : IsOpen U) (hKU : K ⊆ U) : closure K ⊆ U := by
rw [hK.closure_eq_biUnion_inseparable, iUnion₂_subset_iff]
exact fun x hx y hxy ↦ (hxy.mem_open_iff hU).1 (hKU hx)
/-- The closure of a compact set in an R₁ space is a compact set. -/
protected theorem IsCompact.closure {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) : IsCompact (closure K) := by
refine isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hKU ↦ ?_
rcases hK.elim_finite_subcover U hUo (subset_closure.trans hKU) with ⟨t, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, hK.closure_subset_of_isOpen (isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ ↦ hUo _) ht⟩
theorem IsCompact.closure_of_subset {s K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (h : s ⊆ K) :
IsCompact (closure s) :=
hK.closure.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure (closure_mono h)
#align is_compact_closure_of_subset_compact IsCompact.closure_of_subset
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias isCompact_closure_of_subset_compact := IsCompact.closure_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem exists_isCompact_superset_iff {s : Set X} :
(∃ K, IsCompact K ∧ s ⊆ K) ↔ IsCompact (closure s) :=
⟨fun ⟨_K, hK, hsK⟩ => hK.closure_of_subset hsK, fun h => ⟨closure s, h, subset_closure⟩⟩
#align exists_compact_superset_iff exists_isCompact_superset_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias exists_compact_superset_iff := exists_isCompact_superset_iff
/-- If `K` and `L` are disjoint compact sets in an R₁ topological space
and `L` is also closed, then `K` and `L` have disjoint neighborhoods. -/
theorem SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed {K L : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hL : IsCompact L) (h'L : IsClosed L) (hd : Disjoint K L) : SeparatedNhds K L := by
simp_rw [separatedNhds_iff_disjoint, hK.disjoint_nhdsSet_left, hL.disjoint_nhdsSet_right,
disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable]
intro x hx y hy h
exact absurd ((h.mem_closed_iff h'L).2 hy) <| disjoint_left.1 hd hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias separatedNhds_of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed := SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed
/-- If a compact set is covered by two open sets, then we can cover it by two compact subsets. -/
theorem IsCompact.binary_compact_cover {K U V : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2K : K ⊆ U ∪ V) :
∃ K₁ K₂ : Set X, IsCompact K₁ ∧ IsCompact K₂ ∧ K₁ ⊆ U ∧ K₂ ⊆ V ∧ K = K₁ ∪ K₂ := by
have hK' : IsCompact (closure K) := hK.closure
have : SeparatedNhds (closure K \ U) (closure K \ V) := by
apply SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed (hK'.diff hU) (hK'.diff hV)
(isClosed_closure.sdiff hV)
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, diff_inter_diff, diff_eq_empty]
exact hK.closure_subset_of_isOpen (hU.union hV) h2K
have : SeparatedNhds (K \ U) (K \ V) :=
this.mono (diff_subset_diff_left (subset_closure)) (diff_subset_diff_left (subset_closure))
rcases this with ⟨O₁, O₂, h1O₁, h1O₂, h2O₁, h2O₂, hO⟩
exact ⟨K \ O₁, K \ O₂, hK.diff h1O₁, hK.diff h1O₂, diff_subset_comm.mp h2O₁,
diff_subset_comm.mp h2O₂, by rw [← diff_inter, hO.inter_eq, diff_empty]⟩
#align is_compact.binary_compact_cover IsCompact.binary_compact_cover
/-- For every finite open cover `Uᵢ` of a compact set, there exists a compact cover `Kᵢ ⊆ Uᵢ`. -/
theorem IsCompact.finite_compact_cover {s : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) {ι : Type*}
(t : Finset ι) (U : ι → Set X) (hU : ∀ i ∈ t, IsOpen (U i)) (hsC : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
∃ K : ι → Set X, (∀ i, IsCompact (K i)) ∧ (∀ i, K i ⊆ U i) ∧ s = ⋃ i ∈ t, K i := by
induction' t using Finset.induction with x t hx ih generalizing U s
· refine ⟨fun _ => ∅, fun _ => isCompact_empty, fun i => empty_subset _, ?_⟩
simpa only [subset_empty_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iUnion_false, iUnion_empty] using hsC
simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_insert] at hsC
simp only [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hU
have hU' : ∀ i ∈ t, IsOpen (U i) := fun i hi => hU.2 i hi
rcases hs.binary_compact_cover hU.1 (isOpen_biUnion hU') hsC with
⟨K₁, K₂, h1K₁, h1K₂, h2K₁, h2K₂, hK⟩
rcases ih h1K₂ U hU' h2K₂ with ⟨K, h1K, h2K, h3K⟩
refine ⟨update K x K₁, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro i
rcases eq_or_ne i x with rfl | hi
· simp only [update_same, h1K₁]
· simp only [update_noteq hi, h1K]
· intro i
rcases eq_or_ne i x with rfl | hi
· simp only [update_same, h2K₁]
· simp only [update_noteq hi, h2K]
· simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_insert_update _ hx, hK, h3K]
#align is_compact.finite_compact_cover IsCompact.finite_compact_cover
theorem R1Space.of_continuous_specializes_imp [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X} (hc : Continuous f)
(hspec : ∀ x y, f x ⤳ f y → x ⤳ y) : R1Space Y where
specializes_or_disjoint_nhds x y := (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds (f x) (f y)).imp (hspec x y) <|
((hc.tendsto _).disjoint · (hc.tendsto _))
theorem Inducing.r1Space [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X} (hf : Inducing f) : R1Space Y :=
.of_continuous_specializes_imp hf.continuous fun _ _ ↦ hf.specializes_iff.1
protected theorem R1Space.induced (f : Y → X) : @R1Space Y (.induced f ‹_›) :=
@Inducing.r1Space _ _ _ _ (.induced f _) f (inducing_induced f)
instance (p : X → Prop) : R1Space (Subtype p) := .induced _
protected theorem R1Space.sInf {X : Type*} {T : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
(hT : ∀ t ∈ T, @R1Space X t) : @R1Space X (sInf T) := by
let _ := sInf T
refine ⟨fun x y ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Specializes, nhds_sInf]
rcases em (∃ t ∈ T, Disjoint (@nhds X t x) (@nhds X t y)) with ⟨t, htT, htd⟩ | hTd
· exact .inr <| htd.mono (iInf₂_le t htT) (iInf₂_le t htT)
· push_neg at hTd
exact .inl <| iInf₂_mono fun t ht ↦ ((hT t ht).1 x y).resolve_right (hTd t ht)
protected theorem R1Space.iInf {ι X : Type*} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace X}
(ht : ∀ i, @R1Space X (t i)) : @R1Space X (iInf t) :=
.sInf <| forall_mem_range.2 ht
protected theorem R1Space.inf {X : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X}
(h₁ : @R1Space X t₁) (h₂ : @R1Space X t₂) : @R1Space X (t₁ ⊓ t₂) := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
apply R1Space.iInf
simp [*]
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [R1Space Y] : R1Space (X × Y) :=
.inf (.induced _) (.induced _)
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, R1Space (X i)] :
R1Space (∀ i, X i) :=
.iInf fun _ ↦ .induced _
theorem exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo_of_isCompact_mem_nhds
{X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [R1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X}
{K : Set X} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) (hKc : IsCompact K)
(hKx : K ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ K ∈ 𝓝 x, IsCompact K ∧ MapsTo f K s := by
have hc : IsCompact (f '' K \ interior s) := (hKc.image hf).diff isOpen_interior
obtain ⟨U, V, Uo, Vo, hxU, hV, hd⟩ : SeparatedNhds {f x} (f '' K \ interior s) := by
simp_rw [separatedNhds_iff_disjoint, nhdsSet_singleton, hc.disjoint_nhdsSet_right,
disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable]
rintro y ⟨-, hys⟩ hxy
refine hys <| (hxy.mem_open_iff isOpen_interior).1 ?_
rwa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
refine ⟨K \ f ⁻¹' V, diff_mem hKx ?_, hKc.diff <| Vo.preimage hf, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [hf.continuousAt <| Uo.mem_nhds (hxU rfl)] with x hx
using Set.disjoint_left.1 hd hx
· by_contra hys
exact hy.2 (hV ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hy.1, not_mem_subset interior_subset hys⟩)
instance (priority := 900) {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] [R1Space Y] : LocallyCompactPair X Y where
exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo hf hs :=
let ⟨_K, hKc, hKx⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds _
exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo_of_isCompact_mem_nhds hf hs hKc hKx
/-- If a point in an R₁ space has a compact neighborhood,
then it has a basis of compact closed neighborhoods. -/
theorem IsCompact.isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds {x : X} {L : Set X} (hLc : IsCompact L)
(hxL : L ∈ 𝓝 x) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun K ↦ K ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsCompact K ∧ IsClosed K) (·) :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun _U hU ↦
let ⟨K, hKx, hKc, hKU⟩ := exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo_of_isCompact_mem_nhds
continuous_id (interior_mem_nhds.2 hU) hLc hxL
⟨closure K, mem_of_superset hKx subset_closure, ⟨hKc.closure, isClosed_closure⟩,
(hKc.closure_subset_of_isOpen isOpen_interior hKU).trans interior_subset⟩
/-- In an R₁ space, the filters `coclosedCompact` and `cocompact` are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact : coclosedCompact X = cocompact X := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ cocompact_le_coclosedCompact
rw [hasBasis_coclosedCompact.le_basis_iff hasBasis_cocompact]
exact fun K hK ↦ ⟨closure K, ⟨isClosed_closure, hK.closure⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure⟩
#align filter.coclosed_compact_eq_cocompact Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact
/-- In an R₁ space, the bornologies `relativelyCompact` and `inCompact` are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem Bornology.relativelyCompact_eq_inCompact :
Bornology.relativelyCompact X = Bornology.inCompact X :=
Bornology.ext _ _ Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact
#align bornology.relatively_compact_eq_in_compact Bornology.relativelyCompact_eq_inCompact
/-!
### Lemmas about a weakly locally compact R₁ space
In fact, a space with these properties is locally compact and regular.
Some lemmas are formulated using the latter assumptions below.
-/
variable [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X]
/-- In a (weakly) locally compact R₁ space, compact closed neighborhoods of a point `x`
form a basis of neighborhoods of `x`. -/
theorem isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun K => K ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsCompact K ∧ IsClosed K) (·) :=
let ⟨_L, hLc, hLx⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
hLc.isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds hLx
/-- In a (weakly) locally compact R₁ space, each point admits a compact closed neighborhood. -/
theorem exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_isClosed (x : X) : ∃ K ∈ 𝓝 x, IsCompact K ∧ IsClosed K :=
(isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds x).ex_mem
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A weakly locally compact R₁ space is locally compact. -/
instance (priority := 80) WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace.locallyCompactSpace : LocallyCompactSpace X :=
.of_hasBasis isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds fun _ _ ⟨_, h, _⟩ ↦ h
#align locally_compact_of_compact_nhds WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace.locallyCompactSpace
/-- In a weakly locally compact R₁ space,
every compact set has an open neighborhood with compact closure. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
∃ V, IsOpen V ∧ K ⊆ V ∧ IsCompact (closure V) := by
rcases exists_compact_superset hK with ⟨K', hK', hKK'⟩
exact ⟨interior K', isOpen_interior, hKK', hK'.closure_of_subset interior_subset⟩
#align exists_open_superset_and_is_compact_closure exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias exists_open_superset_and_isCompact_closure := exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure
/-- In a weakly locally compact R₁ space,
every point has an open neighborhood with compact closure. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_mem_isCompact_closure (x : X) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ IsCompact (closure U) := by
simpa only [singleton_subset_iff]
using exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure isCompact_singleton
#align exists_open_with_compact_closure exists_isOpen_mem_isCompact_closure
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias exists_open_with_compact_closure := exists_isOpen_mem_isCompact_closure
end R1Space
/-- A T₂ space, also known as a Hausdorff space, is one in which for every
`x ≠ y` there exists disjoint open sets around `x` and `y`. This is
the most widely used of the separation axioms. -/
@[mk_iff]
class T2Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- Every two points in a Hausdorff space admit disjoint open neighbourhoods. -/
t2 : Pairwise fun x y => ∃ u v : Set X, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v
#align t2_space T2Space
/-- Two different points can be separated by open sets. -/
theorem t2_separation [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v : Set X, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v :=
T2Space.t2 h
#align t2_separation t2_separation
-- todo: use this as a definition?
theorem t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds : T2Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := by
refine (t2Space_iff X).trans (forall₃_congr fun x y _ => ?_)
simp only [(nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y), exists_prop, ← exists_and_left,
and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align t2_space_iff_disjoint_nhds t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhds [T2Space X] {x y : X} : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ x ≠ y :=
⟨fun hd he => by simp [he, nhds_neBot.ne] at hd, (t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds.mp ‹_› ·)⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_nhds disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem pairwise_disjoint_nhds [T2Space X] : Pairwise (Disjoint on (𝓝 : X → Filter X)) := fun _ _ =>
disjoint_nhds_nhds.2
#align pairwise_disjoint_nhds pairwise_disjoint_nhds
protected theorem Set.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds [T2Space X] (s : Set X) : s.PairwiseDisjoint 𝓝 :=
pairwise_disjoint_nhds.set_pairwise s
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_nhds Set.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds
/-- Points of a finite set can be separated by open sets from each other. -/
theorem Set.Finite.t2_separation [T2Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ U : X → Set X, (∀ x, x ∈ U x ∧ IsOpen (U x)) ∧ s.PairwiseDisjoint U :=
s.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds.exists_mem_filter_basis hs nhds_basis_opens
#align set.finite.t2_separation Set.Finite.t2_separation
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T2Space.t1Space [T2Space X] : T1Space X :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds.mpr fun _ _ hne =>
(disjoint_nhds_nhds.2 hne).mono_left <| pure_le_nhds _
#align t2_space.t1_space T2Space.t1Space
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T2Space.r1Space [T2Space X] : R1Space X :=
⟨fun x y ↦ (eq_or_ne x y).imp specializes_of_eq disjoint_nhds_nhds.2⟩
theorem SeparationQuotient.t2Space_iff : T2Space (SeparationQuotient X) ↔ R1Space X := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, Pairwise, surjective_mk.forall₂, ne_eq, mk_eq_mk,
r1Space_iff_inseparable_or_disjoint_nhds, ← disjoint_comap_iff surjective_mk, comap_mk_nhds_mk,
← or_iff_not_imp_left]
instance SeparationQuotient.t2Space [R1Space X] : T2Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
t2Space_iff.2 ‹_›
instance (priority := 80) [R1Space X] [T0Space X] : T2Space X :=
t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds.2 fun _x _y hne ↦ disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable.2 fun hxy ↦
hne hxy.eq
theorem R1Space.t2Space_iff_t0Space [R1Space X] : T2Space X ↔ T0Space X := by
constructor <;> intro <;> infer_instance
/-- A space is T₂ iff the neighbourhoods of distinct points generate the bottom filter. -/
theorem t2_iff_nhds : T2Space X ↔ ∀ {x y : X}, NeBot (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y) → x = y := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, disjoint_iff, neBot_iff, Ne, not_imp_comm, Pairwise]
#align t2_iff_nhds t2_iff_nhds
theorem eq_of_nhds_neBot [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : NeBot (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y)) : x = y :=
t2_iff_nhds.mp ‹_› h
#align eq_of_nhds_ne_bot eq_of_nhds_neBot
theorem t2Space_iff_nhds :
T2Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 y, Disjoint U V := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, Filter.disjoint_iff, Pairwise]
#align t2_space_iff_nhds t2Space_iff_nhds
theorem t2_separation_nhds [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v, u ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ v ∈ 𝓝 y ∧ Disjoint u v :=
let ⟨u, v, open_u, open_v, x_in, y_in, huv⟩ := t2_separation h
⟨u, v, open_u.mem_nhds x_in, open_v.mem_nhds y_in, huv⟩
#align t2_separation_nhds t2_separation_nhds
theorem t2_separation_compact_nhds [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v, u ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ v ∈ 𝓝 y ∧ IsCompact u ∧ IsCompact v ∧ Disjoint u v := by
simpa only [exists_prop, ← exists_and_left, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm] using
((compact_basis_nhds x).disjoint_iff (compact_basis_nhds y)).1 (disjoint_nhds_nhds.2 h)
#align t2_separation_compact_nhds t2_separation_compact_nhds
theorem t2_iff_ultrafilter :
T2Space X ↔ ∀ {x y : X} (f : Ultrafilter X), ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x → ↑f ≤ 𝓝 y → x = y :=
t2_iff_nhds.trans <| by simp only [← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_imp, le_inf_iff, exists_imp]
#align t2_iff_ultrafilter t2_iff_ultrafilter
theorem t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal : T2Space X ↔ IsClosed (diagonal X) := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, ← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall,
nhds_prod_eq, compl_diagonal_mem_prod, mem_compl_iff, mem_diagonal_iff, Pairwise]
#align t2_iff_is_closed_diagonal t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal
theorem isClosed_diagonal [T2Space X] : IsClosed (diagonal X) :=
t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal.mp ‹_›
#align is_closed_diagonal isClosed_diagonal
-- Porting note: 2 lemmas moved below
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique [T2Space X] {f : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X} [NeBot l]
(ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : a = b :=
eq_of_nhds_neBot <| neBot_of_le <| le_inf ha hb
#align tendsto_nhds_unique tendsto_nhds_unique
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique' [T2Space X] {f : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X} (_ : NeBot l)
(ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : a = b :=
eq_of_nhds_neBot <| neBot_of_le <| le_inf ha hb
#align tendsto_nhds_unique' tendsto_nhds_unique'
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventuallyEq [T2Space X] {f g : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X}
[NeBot l] (ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (hfg : f =ᶠ[l] g) : a = b :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (ha.congr' hfg) hb
#align tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventually_eq tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventuallyEq
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq [T2Space X] {f g : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X}
(ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (hfg : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x = g x) : a = b :=
have : ∃ᶠ z : X × X in 𝓝 (a, b), z.1 = z.2 := (ha.prod_mk_nhds hb).frequently hfg
not_not.1 fun hne => this (isClosed_diagonal.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hne)
#align tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq
/-- If `s` and `t` are compact sets in a T₂ space, then the set neighborhoods filter of `s ∩ t`
is the infimum of set neighborhoods filters for `s` and `t`.
For general sets, only the `≤` inequality holds, see `nhdsSet_inter_le`. -/
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_inter_eq [T2Space X] {s t : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) :
𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t) = 𝓝ˢ s ⊓ 𝓝ˢ t := by
refine le_antisymm (nhdsSet_inter_le _ _) ?_
simp_rw [hs.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup, ht.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup, nhdsSet, sSup_image]
refine iSup₂_le fun x hxs ↦ iSup₂_le fun y hyt ↦ ?_
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl|hne)
· exact le_iSup₂_of_le x ⟨hxs, hyt⟩ (inf_idem _).le
· exact (disjoint_nhds_nhds.mpr hne).eq_bot ▸ bot_le
/-- If a function `f` is
- injective on a compact set `s`;
- continuous at every point of this set;
- injective on a neighborhood of each point of this set,
then it is injective on a neighborhood of this set. -/
theorem Set.InjOn.exists_mem_nhdsSet {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[T2Space Y] {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} (inj : InjOn f s) (sc : IsCompact s)
(fc : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (loc : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, InjOn f u) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s, InjOn f t := by
have : ∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ s, ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y.1 = f y.2 → y.1 = y.2 := fun (x, y) ⟨hx, hy⟩ ↦ by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl | hne
· rcases loc x hx with ⟨u, hu, hf⟩
exact Filter.mem_of_superset (prod_mem_nhds hu hu) <| forall_prod_set.2 hf
· suffices ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 (x, y), f z.1 ≠ f z.2 from this.mono fun _ hne h ↦ absurd h hne
refine (fc x hx).prod_map' (fc y hy) <| isClosed_diagonal.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds ?_
exact inj.ne hx hy hne
rw [← eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall, sc.nhdsSet_prod_eq sc] at this
exact eventually_prod_self_iff.1 this
/-- If a function `f` is
- injective on a compact set `s`;
- continuous at every point of this set;
- injective on a neighborhood of each point of this set,
then it is injective on an open neighborhood of this set. -/
theorem Set.InjOn.exists_isOpen_superset {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[T2Space Y] {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} (inj : InjOn f s) (sc : IsCompact s)
(fc : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (loc : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, InjOn f u) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ InjOn f t :=
let ⟨_t, hst, ht⟩ := inj.exists_mem_nhdsSet sc fc loc
let ⟨u, huo, hsu, hut⟩ := mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists.1 hst
⟨u, huo, hsu, ht.mono hut⟩
section limUnder
variable [T2Space X] {f : Filter X}
/-!
### Properties of `lim` and `limUnder`
In this section we use explicit `Nonempty X` instances for `lim` and `limUnder`. This way the lemmas
are useful without a `Nonempty X` instance.
-/
theorem lim_eq {x : X} [NeBot f] (h : f ≤ 𝓝 x) : @lim _ _ ⟨x⟩ f = x :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (le_nhds_lim ⟨x, h⟩) h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Lim_eq lim_eq
theorem lim_eq_iff [NeBot f] (h : ∃ x : X, f ≤ 𝓝 x) {x} : @lim _ _ ⟨x⟩ f = x ↔ f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨fun c => c ▸ le_nhds_lim h, lim_eq⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Lim_eq_iff lim_eq_iff
theorem Ultrafilter.lim_eq_iff_le_nhds [CompactSpace X] {x : X} {F : Ultrafilter X} :
F.lim = x ↔ ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ F.le_nhds_lim, lim_eq⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ultrafilter.Lim_eq_iff_le_nhds Ultrafilter.lim_eq_iff_le_nhds
theorem isOpen_iff_ultrafilter' [CompactSpace X] (U : Set X) :
IsOpen U ↔ ∀ F : Ultrafilter X, F.lim ∈ U → U ∈ F.1 := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ultrafilter]
refine ⟨fun h F hF => h F.lim hF F F.le_nhds_lim, ?_⟩
intro cond x hx f h
rw [← Ultrafilter.lim_eq_iff_le_nhds.2 h] at hx
exact cond _ hx
#align is_open_iff_ultrafilter' isOpen_iff_ultrafilter'
theorem Filter.Tendsto.limUnder_eq {x : X} {f : Filter Y} [NeBot f] {g : Y → X}
(h : Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) : @limUnder _ _ _ ⟨x⟩ f g = x :=
lim_eq h
#align filter.tendsto.lim_eq Filter.Tendsto.limUnder_eq
theorem Filter.limUnder_eq_iff {f : Filter Y} [NeBot f] {g : Y → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x))
{x} : @limUnder _ _ _ ⟨x⟩ f g = x ↔ Tendsto g f (𝓝 x) :=
⟨fun c => c ▸ tendsto_nhds_limUnder h, Filter.Tendsto.limUnder_eq⟩
#align filter.lim_eq_iff Filter.limUnder_eq_iff
theorem Continuous.limUnder_eq [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (y : Y) :
@limUnder _ _ _ ⟨f y⟩ (𝓝 y) f = f y :=
(h.tendsto y).limUnder_eq
#align continuous.lim_eq Continuous.limUnder_eq
@[simp]
theorem lim_nhds (x : X) : @lim _ _ ⟨x⟩ (𝓝 x) = x :=
lim_eq le_rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Lim_nhds lim_nhds
@[simp]
theorem limUnder_nhds_id (x : X) : @limUnder _ _ _ ⟨x⟩ (𝓝 x) id = x :=
lim_nhds x
#align lim_nhds_id limUnder_nhds_id
@[simp]
theorem lim_nhdsWithin {x : X} {s : Set X} (h : x ∈ closure s) : @lim _ _ ⟨x⟩ (𝓝[s] x) = x :=
haveI : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) := mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 h
lim_eq inf_le_left
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Lim_nhds_within lim_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem limUnder_nhdsWithin_id {x : X} {s : Set X} (h : x ∈ closure s) :
@limUnder _ _ _ ⟨x⟩ (𝓝[s] x) id = x :=
lim_nhdsWithin h
#align lim_nhds_within_id limUnder_nhdsWithin_id
end limUnder
/-!
### `T2Space` constructions
We use two lemmas to prove that various standard constructions generate Hausdorff spaces from
Hausdorff spaces:
* `separated_by_continuous` says that two points `x y : X` can be separated by open neighborhoods
provided that there exists a continuous map `f : X → Y` with a Hausdorff codomain such that
`f x ≠ f y`. We use this lemma to prove that topological spaces defined using `induced` are
Hausdorff spaces.
* `separated_by_openEmbedding` says that for an open embedding `f : X → Y` of a Hausdorff space
`X`, the images of two distinct points `x y : X`, `x ≠ y` can be separated by open neighborhoods.
We use this lemma to prove that topological spaces defined using `coinduced` are Hausdorff spaces.
-/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) DiscreteTopology.toT2Space
[DiscreteTopology X] : T2Space X :=
⟨fun x y h => ⟨{x}, {y}, isOpen_discrete _, isOpen_discrete _, rfl, rfl, disjoint_singleton.2 h⟩⟩
#align discrete_topology.to_t2_space DiscreteTopology.toT2Space
theorem separated_by_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {x y : X} (h : f x ≠ f y) :
∃ u v : Set X, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v :=
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, xu, yv, uv⟩ := t2_separation h
⟨f ⁻¹' u, f ⁻¹' v, uo.preimage hf, vo.preimage hf, xu, yv, uv.preimage _⟩
#align separated_by_continuous separated_by_continuous
theorem separated_by_openEmbedding [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space X]
{f : X → Y} (hf : OpenEmbedding f) {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v : Set Y, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ f y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v :=
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, xu, yv, uv⟩ := t2_separation h
⟨f '' u, f '' v, hf.isOpenMap _ uo, hf.isOpenMap _ vo, mem_image_of_mem _ xu,
mem_image_of_mem _ yv, disjoint_image_of_injective hf.inj uv⟩
#align separated_by_open_embedding separated_by_openEmbedding
instance {p : X → Prop} [T2Space X] : T2Space (Subtype p) := inferInstance
instance Prod.t2Space [T2Space X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y] : T2Space (X × Y) :=
inferInstance
/-- If the codomain of an injective continuous function is a Hausdorff space, then so is its
domain. -/
theorem T2Space.of_injective_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hinj : Injective f) (hc : Continuous f) : T2Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => separated_by_continuous hc (hinj.ne h)⟩
/-- If the codomain of a topological embedding is a Hausdorff space, then so is its domain.
See also `T2Space.of_continuous_injective`. -/
theorem Embedding.t2Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y] {f : X → Y} (hf : Embedding f) :
T2Space X :=
.of_injective_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t2_space Embedding.t2Space
instance ULift.instT2Space [T2Space X] : T2Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t2Space
instance [T2Space X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y] :
T2Space (X ⊕ Y) := by
constructor
rintro (x | x) (y | y) h
· exact separated_by_openEmbedding openEmbedding_inl <| ne_of_apply_ne _ h
· exact separated_by_continuous continuous_isLeft <| by simp
· exact separated_by_continuous continuous_isLeft <| by simp
· exact separated_by_openEmbedding openEmbedding_inr <| ne_of_apply_ne _ h
instance Pi.t2Space {Y : X → Type v} [∀ a, TopologicalSpace (Y a)]
[∀ a, T2Space (Y a)] : T2Space (∀ a, Y a) :=
inferInstance
#align Pi.t2_space Pi.t2Space
instance Sigma.t2Space {ι} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ a, T2Space (X a)] :
T2Space (Σi, X i) := by
constructor
rintro ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ neq
rcases eq_or_ne i j with (rfl | h)
· replace neq : x ≠ y := ne_of_apply_ne _ neq
exact separated_by_openEmbedding openEmbedding_sigmaMk neq
· let _ := (⊥ : TopologicalSpace ι); have : DiscreteTopology ι := ⟨rfl⟩
exact separated_by_continuous (continuous_def.2 fun u _ => isOpen_sigma_fst_preimage u) h
#align sigma.t2_space Sigma.t2Space
section
variable (X)
/-- The smallest equivalence relation on a topological space giving a T2 quotient. -/
def t2Setoid : Setoid X := sInf {s | T2Space (Quotient s)}
/-- The largest T2 quotient of a topological space. This construction is left-adjoint to the
inclusion of T2 spaces into all topological spaces. -/
def t2Quotient := Quotient (t2Setoid X)
namespace t2Quotient
variable {X}
instance : TopologicalSpace (t2Quotient X) :=
inferInstanceAs <| TopologicalSpace (Quotient _)
/-- The map from a topological space to its largest T2 quotient. -/
def mk : X → t2Quotient X := Quotient.mk (t2Setoid X)
lemma mk_eq {x y : X} : mk x = mk y ↔ ∀ s : Setoid X, T2Space (Quotient s) → s.Rel x y :=
Setoid.quotient_mk_sInf_eq
variable (X)
lemma surjective_mk : Surjective (mk : X → t2Quotient X) := surjective_quotient_mk _
lemma continuous_mk : Continuous (mk : X → t2Quotient X) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
variable {X}
@[elab_as_elim]
protected lemma inductionOn {motive : t2Quotient X → Prop} (q : t2Quotient X)
(h : ∀ x, motive (t2Quotient.mk x)) : motive q := Quotient.inductionOn q h
@[elab_as_elim]
protected lemma inductionOn₂ [TopologicalSpace Y] {motive : t2Quotient X → t2Quotient Y → Prop}
(q : t2Quotient X) (q' : t2Quotient Y) (h : ∀ x y, motive (mk x) (mk y)) : motive q q' :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q q' h
/-- The largest T2 quotient of a topological space is indeed T2. -/
instance : T2Space (t2Quotient X) := by
rw [t2Space_iff]
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ (h : ¬ t2Quotient.mk x = t2Quotient.mk y)
obtain ⟨s, hs, hsxy⟩ : ∃ s, T2Space (Quotient s) ∧ Quotient.mk s x ≠ Quotient.mk s y := by
simpa [t2Quotient.mk_eq] using h
exact separated_by_continuous (continuous_map_sInf (by exact hs)) hsxy
lemma compatible {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : letI _ := t2Setoid X
∀ (a b : X), a ≈ b → f a = f b := by
change t2Setoid X ≤ Setoid.ker f
exact sInf_le <| .of_injective_continuous
(Setoid.ker_lift_injective _) (hf.quotient_lift fun _ _ ↦ id)
/-- The universal property of the largest T2 quotient of a topological space `X`: any continuous
map from `X` to a T2 space `Y` uniquely factors through `t2Quotient X`. This declaration builds the
factored map. Its continuity is `t2Quotient.continuous_lift`, the fact that it indeed factors the
original map is `t2Quotient.lift_mk` and uniquenes is `t2Quotient.unique_lift`. -/
def lift {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : t2Quotient X → Y :=
Quotient.lift f (t2Quotient.compatible hf)
lemma continuous_lift {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous (t2Quotient.lift hf) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.mpr hf
@[simp]
lemma lift_mk {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (x : X) : lift hf (mk x) = f x :=
Quotient.lift_mk (s := t2Setoid X) f (t2Quotient.compatible hf) x
lemma unique_lift {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T2Space Y]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {g : t2Quotient X → Y} (hfg : g ∘ mk = f) :
g = lift hf := by
apply surjective_mk X |>.right_cancellable |>.mp <| funext _
simp [← hfg]
end t2Quotient
end
variable {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
theorem isClosed_eq [T2Space X] {f g : Y → X} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
IsClosed { y : Y | f y = g y } :=
continuous_iff_isClosed.mp (hf.prod_mk hg) _ isClosed_diagonal
#align is_closed_eq isClosed_eq
theorem isOpen_ne_fun [T2Space X] {f g : Y → X} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
IsOpen { y : Y | f y ≠ g y } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr <| isClosed_eq hf hg
#align is_open_ne_fun isOpen_ne_fun
/-- If two continuous maps are equal on `s`, then they are equal on the closure of `s`. See also
`Set.EqOn.of_subset_closure` for a more general version. -/
protected theorem Set.EqOn.closure [T2Space X] {s : Set Y} {f g : Y → X} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : EqOn f g (closure s) :=
closure_minimal h (isClosed_eq hf hg)
#align set.eq_on.closure Set.EqOn.closure
/-- If two continuous functions are equal on a dense set, then they are equal. -/
theorem Continuous.ext_on [T2Space X] {s : Set Y} (hs : Dense s) {f g : Y → X} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h : EqOn f g s) : f = g :=
funext fun x => h.closure hf hg (hs x)
#align continuous.ext_on Continuous.ext_on
theorem eqOn_closure₂' [T2Space Z] {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {f g : X → Y → Z}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y = g x y) (hf₁ : ∀ x, Continuous (f x))
(hf₂ : ∀ y, Continuous fun x => f x y) (hg₁ : ∀ x, Continuous (g x))
(hg₂ : ∀ y, Continuous fun x => g x y) : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ∀ y ∈ closure t, f x y = g x y :=
suffices closure s ⊆ ⋂ y ∈ closure t, { x | f x y = g x y } by simpa only [subset_def, mem_iInter]
(closure_minimal fun x hx => mem_iInter₂.2 <| Set.EqOn.closure (h x hx) (hf₁ _) (hg₁ _)) <|
isClosed_biInter fun y _ => isClosed_eq (hf₂ _) (hg₂ _)
#align eq_on_closure₂' eqOn_closure₂'
theorem eqOn_closure₂ [T2Space Z] {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {f g : X → Y → Z}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y = g x y) (hf : Continuous (uncurry f))
(hg : Continuous (uncurry g)) : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ∀ y ∈ closure t, f x y = g x y :=
eqOn_closure₂' h hf.uncurry_left hf.uncurry_right hg.uncurry_left hg.uncurry_right
#align eq_on_closure₂ eqOn_closure₂
/-- If `f x = g x` for all `x ∈ s` and `f`, `g` are continuous on `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ closure s`, then
`f x = g x` for all `x ∈ t`. See also `Set.EqOn.closure`. -/
theorem Set.EqOn.of_subset_closure [T2Space Y] {s t : Set X} {f g : X → Y} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f t) (hg : ContinuousOn g t) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t ⊆ closure s) :
EqOn f g t := by
intro x hx
have : (𝓝[s] x).NeBot := mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.mp (hts hx)
exact
tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventuallyEq ((hf x hx).mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst)
((hg x hx).mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h.eventuallyEq_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin)
#align set.eq_on.of_subset_closure Set.EqOn.of_subset_closure
theorem Function.LeftInverse.isClosed_range [T2Space X] {f : X → Y} {g : Y → X}
(h : Function.LeftInverse f g) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : IsClosed (range g) :=
have : EqOn (g ∘ f) id (closure <| range g) :=
h.rightInvOn_range.eqOn.closure (hg.comp hf) continuous_id
isClosed_of_closure_subset fun x hx => ⟨f x, this hx⟩
#align function.left_inverse.closed_range Function.LeftInverse.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")]
alias Function.LeftInverse.closed_range := Function.LeftInverse.isClosed_range
theorem Function.LeftInverse.closedEmbedding [T2Space X] {f : X → Y} {g : Y → X}
(h : Function.LeftInverse f g) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : ClosedEmbedding g :=
⟨h.embedding hf hg, h.isClosed_range hf hg⟩
#align function.left_inverse.closed_embedding Function.LeftInverse.closedEmbedding
theorem SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact [T2Space X] {s t : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(ht : IsCompact t) (hst : Disjoint s t) : SeparatedNhds s t := by
simp only [SeparatedNhds, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint.symm] at hst ⊢
exact generalized_tube_lemma hs ht isClosed_diagonal.isOpen_compl hst
#align is_compact_is_compact_separated SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias separatedNhds_of_isCompact_isCompact := SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact
section SeparatedFinset
theorem SeparatedNhds.of_finset_finset [T2Space X] (s t : Finset X) (h : Disjoint s t) :
SeparatedNhds (s : Set X) t :=
.of_isCompact_isCompact s.finite_toSet.isCompact t.finite_toSet.isCompact <| mod_cast h
#align finset_disjoint_finset_opens_of_t2 SeparatedNhds.of_finset_finset
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias separatedNhds_of_finset_finset := SeparatedNhds.of_finset_finset
theorem SeparatedNhds.of_singleton_finset [T2Space X] {x : X} {s : Finset X} (h : x ∉ s) :
SeparatedNhds ({x} : Set X) s :=
mod_cast .of_finset_finset {x} s (Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr h)
#align point_disjoint_finset_opens_of_t2 SeparatedNhds.of_singleton_finset
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias point_disjoint_finset_opens_of_t2 := SeparatedNhds.of_singleton_finset
end SeparatedFinset
/-- In a `T2Space`, every compact set is closed. -/
theorem IsCompact.isClosed [T2Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) : IsClosed s :=
isOpen_compl_iff.1 <| isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open.mpr fun x hx =>
let ⟨u, v, _, vo, su, xv, uv⟩ :=
SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact hs isCompact_singleton (disjoint_singleton_right.2 hx)
⟨v, (uv.mono_left <| show s ≤ u from su).subset_compl_left, vo, by simpa using xv⟩
#align is_compact.is_closed IsCompact.isClosed
theorem IsCompact.preimage_continuous [CompactSpace X] [T2Space Y] {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' s) :=
(hs.isClosed.preimage hf).isCompact
lemma Pi.isCompact_iff {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
[∀ i, T2Space (π i)] {s : Set (Π i, π i)} :
IsCompact s ↔ IsClosed s ∧ ∀ i, IsCompact (eval i '' s):= by
constructor <;> intro H
· exact ⟨H.isClosed, fun i ↦ H.image <| continuous_apply i⟩
· exact IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (isCompact_univ_pi H.2) H.1 (subset_pi_eval_image univ s)
lemma Pi.isCompact_closure_iff {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
[∀ i, T2Space (π i)] {s : Set (Π i, π i)} :
IsCompact (closure s) ↔ ∀ i, IsCompact (closure <| eval i '' s) := by
simp_rw [← exists_isCompact_superset_iff, Pi.exists_compact_superset_iff, image_subset_iff]
/-- If `V : ι → Set X` is a decreasing family of compact sets then any neighborhood of
`⋂ i, V i` contains some `V i`. This is a version of `exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact'` where we
don't need to assume each `V i` closed because it follows from compactness since `X` is
assumed to be Hausdorff. -/
theorem exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact [T2Space X] {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {V : ι → Set X}
(hV : Directed (· ⊇ ·) V) (hV_cpct : ∀ i, IsCompact (V i)) {U : Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ ⋂ i, V i, U ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ i, V i ⊆ U :=
exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact' hV hV_cpct (fun i => (hV_cpct i).isClosed) hU
#align exists_subset_nhds_of_is_compact exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact
theorem CompactExhaustion.isClosed [T2Space X] (K : CompactExhaustion X) (n : ℕ) : IsClosed (K n) :=
(K.isCompact n).isClosed
#align compact_exhaustion.is_closed CompactExhaustion.isClosed
theorem IsCompact.inter [T2Space X] {s t : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) :
IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
hs.inter_right <| ht.isClosed
#align is_compact.inter IsCompact.inter
theorem image_closure_of_isCompact [T2Space Y] {s : Set X} (hs : IsCompact (closure s)) {f : X → Y}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) : f '' closure s = closure (f '' s) :=
Subset.antisymm hf.image_closure <|
closure_minimal (image_subset f subset_closure) (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isClosed
#align image_closure_of_is_compact image_closure_of_isCompact
/-- A continuous map from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a closed map. -/
protected theorem Continuous.isClosedMap [CompactSpace X] [T2Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(h : Continuous f) : IsClosedMap f := fun _s hs => (hs.isCompact.image h).isClosed
#align continuous.is_closed_map Continuous.isClosedMap
/-- A continuous injective map from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a closed embedding. -/
theorem Continuous.closedEmbedding [CompactSpace X] [T2Space Y] {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : ClosedEmbedding f :=
closedEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_closed h hf h.isClosedMap
#align continuous.closed_embedding Continuous.closedEmbedding
/-- A continuous surjective map from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a quotient map. -/
theorem QuotientMap.of_surjective_continuous [CompactSpace X] [T2Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hsurj : Surjective f) (hcont : Continuous f) : QuotientMap f :=
hcont.isClosedMap.to_quotientMap hcont hsurj
#align quotient_map.of_surjective_continuous QuotientMap.of_surjective_continuous
theorem isPreirreducible_iff_subsingleton [T2Space X] {S : Set X} :
IsPreirreducible S ↔ S.Subsingleton := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx y hy => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.isPreirreducible⟩
by_contra e
obtain ⟨U, V, hU, hV, hxU, hyV, h'⟩ := t2_separation e
exact ((h U V hU hV ⟨x, hx, hxU⟩ ⟨y, hy, hyV⟩).mono inter_subset_right).not_disjoint h'
#align is_preirreducible_iff_subsingleton isPreirreducible_iff_subsingleton
-- todo: use `alias` + `attribute [protected]` once we get `attribute [protected]`
protected lemma IsPreirreducible.subsingleton [T2Space X] {S : Set X} (h : IsPreirreducible S) :
S.Subsingleton :=
isPreirreducible_iff_subsingleton.1 h
#align is_preirreducible.subsingleton IsPreirreducible.subsingleton
theorem isIrreducible_iff_singleton [T2Space X] {S : Set X} : IsIrreducible S ↔ ∃ x, S = {x} := by
rw [IsIrreducible, isPreirreducible_iff_subsingleton,
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton]
#align is_irreducible_iff_singleton isIrreducible_iff_singleton
/-- There does not exist a nontrivial preirreducible T₂ space. -/
theorem not_preirreducible_nontrivial_t2 (X) [TopologicalSpace X] [PreirreducibleSpace X]
[Nontrivial X] [T2Space X] : False :=
(PreirreducibleSpace.isPreirreducible_univ (X := X)).subsingleton.not_nontrivial nontrivial_univ
#align not_preirreducible_nontrivial_t2 not_preirreducible_nontrivial_t2
end Separation
section RegularSpace
/-- A topological space is called a *regular space* if for any closed set `s` and `a ∉ s`, there
exist disjoint open sets `U ⊇ s` and `V ∋ a`. We formulate this condition in terms of `Disjoint`ness
of filters `𝓝ˢ s` and `𝓝 a`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class RegularSpace (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- If `a` is a point that does not belong to a closed set `s`, then `a` and `s` admit disjoint
neighborhoods. -/
regular : ∀ {s : Set X} {a}, IsClosed s → a ∉ s → Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝 a)
#align regular_space RegularSpace
theorem regularSpace_TFAE (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
List.TFAE [RegularSpace X,
∀ (s : Set X) x, x ∉ closure s → Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝 x),
∀ (x : X) (s : Set X), Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝 x) ↔ x ∉ closure s,
∀ (x : X) (s : Set X), s ∈ 𝓝 x → ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s,
∀ x : X, (𝓝 x).lift' closure ≤ 𝓝 x,
∀ x : X , (𝓝 x).lift' closure = 𝓝 x] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 5
· rw [regularSpace_iff, (@compl_surjective (Set X) _).forall, forall_swap]
simp only [isClosed_compl_iff, mem_compl_iff, Classical.not_not, @and_comm (_ ∈ _),
(nhds_basis_opens _).lift'_closure.le_basis_iff (nhds_basis_opens _), and_imp,
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_right, exists_prop, ← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet,
interior_compl, compl_subset_compl]
tfae_have 5 → 6
· exact fun h a => (h a).antisymm (𝓝 _).le_lift'_closure
tfae_have 6 → 4
· intro H a s hs
rw [← H] at hs
rcases (𝓝 a).basis_sets.lift'_closure.mem_iff.mp hs with ⟨U, hU, hUs⟩
exact ⟨closure U, mem_of_superset hU subset_closure, isClosed_closure, hUs⟩
tfae_have 4 → 2
· intro H s a ha
have ha' : sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 a := by rwa [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_compl]
rcases H _ _ ha' with ⟨U, hU, hUc, hUs⟩
refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_left ?_ hU
rwa [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, hUc.isOpen_compl.interior_eq, subset_compl_comm]
tfae_have 2 → 3
· refine fun H a s => ⟨fun hd has => mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot.mp has ?_, H s a⟩
exact (hd.symm.mono_right <| @principal_le_nhdsSet _ _ s).eq_bot
tfae_have 3 → 1
· exact fun H => ⟨fun hs ha => (H _ _).mpr <| hs.closure_eq.symm ▸ ha⟩
tfae_finish
#align regular_space_tfae regularSpace_TFAE
theorem RegularSpace.of_lift'_closure_le (h : ∀ x : X, (𝓝 x).lift' closure ≤ 𝓝 x) :
RegularSpace X :=
Iff.mpr ((regularSpace_TFAE X).out 0 4) h
theorem RegularSpace.of_lift'_closure (h : ∀ x : X, (𝓝 x).lift' closure = 𝓝 x) : RegularSpace X :=
Iff.mpr ((regularSpace_TFAE X).out 0 5) h
#align regular_space.of_lift'_closure RegularSpace.of_lift'_closure
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-28")]
alias RegularSpace.ofLift'_closure := RegularSpace.of_lift'_closure
theorem RegularSpace.of_hasBasis {ι : X → Sort*} {p : ∀ a, ι a → Prop} {s : ∀ a, ι a → Set X}
(h₁ : ∀ a, (𝓝 a).HasBasis (p a) (s a)) (h₂ : ∀ a i, p a i → IsClosed (s a i)) :
RegularSpace X :=
.of_lift'_closure fun a => (h₁ a).lift'_closure_eq_self (h₂ a)
#align regular_space.of_basis RegularSpace.of_hasBasis
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-28")]
alias RegularSpace.ofBasis := RegularSpace.of_hasBasis
theorem RegularSpace.of_exists_mem_nhds_isClosed_subset
(h : ∀ (x : X), ∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s) : RegularSpace X :=
Iff.mpr ((regularSpace_TFAE X).out 0 3) h
#align regular_space.of_exists_mem_nhds_is_closed_subset RegularSpace.of_exists_mem_nhds_isClosed_subset
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-28")]
alias RegularSpace.ofExistsMemNhdsIsClosedSubset := RegularSpace.of_exists_mem_nhds_isClosed_subset
/-- A weakly locally compact R₁ space is regular. -/
instance (priority := 100) [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X] [R1Space X] : RegularSpace X :=
.of_hasBasis isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds fun _ _ ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ h
variable [RegularSpace X] {x : X} {s : Set X}
theorem disjoint_nhdsSet_nhds : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝 x) ↔ x ∉ closure s := by
have h := (regularSpace_TFAE X).out 0 2
exact h.mp ‹_› _ _
#align disjoint_nhds_set_nhds disjoint_nhdsSet_nhds
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhdsSet : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ x ∉ closure s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_nhdsSet_nhds
#align disjoint_nhds_nhds_set disjoint_nhds_nhdsSet
/-- A regular space is R₁. -/
instance (priority := 100) : R1Space X where
specializes_or_disjoint_nhds _ _ := or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h ↦ by
rwa [← nhdsSet_singleton, disjoint_nhdsSet_nhds, ← specializes_iff_mem_closure]
| Mathlib/Topology/Separation.lean | 1,992 | 1,995 | theorem exists_mem_nhds_isClosed_subset {x : X} {s : Set X} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s := by |
have h' := (regularSpace_TFAE X).out 0 3
exact h'.mp ‹_› _ _ h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
#align_import data.is_R_or_C.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"baa88307f3e699fa7054ef04ec79fa4f056169cb"
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Data/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
open ComplexConjugate
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
re : K →+ ℝ
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
#align is_R_or_C RCLike
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
open ComplexConjugate
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
#align is_R_or_C.algebra_map_coe RCLike.algebraMapCoe
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_alg RCLike.ofReal_alg
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_eq_coe_mul RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_eq_coe_smul RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
#align is_R_or_C.algebra_map_eq_of_real RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.re_add_im RCLike.re_add_im
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_re RCLike.ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_im RCLike.ofReal_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
#align is_R_or_C.mul_re RCLike.mul_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
#align is_R_or_C.mul_im RCLike.mul_im
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
#align is_R_or_C.ext_iff RCLike.ext_iff
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
#align is_R_or_C.ext RCLike.ext
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_zero RCLike.ofReal_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
#align is_R_or_C.zero_re' RCLike.zero_re'
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_one RCLike.ofReal_one
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
#align is_R_or_C.one_re RCLike.one_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
#align is_R_or_C.one_im RCLike.one_im
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_injective RCLike.ofReal_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_inj RCLike.ofReal_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit0_re
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit1_re
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit0_im
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit1_im
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_eq_zero RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_ne_zero RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_add RCLike.ofReal_add
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
#noalign is_R_or_C.of_real_bit0
#noalign is_R_or_C.of_real_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_neg RCLike.ofReal_neg
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_sub RCLike.ofReal_sub
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_sum RCLike.ofReal_sum
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsupp_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_finsupp_sum RCLike.ofReal_finsupp_sum
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul RCLike.ofReal_mul
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_pow RCLike.ofReal_pow
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_prod RCLike.ofReal_prod
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_prod {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsupp_prod _ f g
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_finsupp_prod RCLike.ofReal_finsupp_prod
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_of_real RCLike.real_smul_ofReal
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul_re RCLike.re_ofReal_mul
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul_im RCLike.im_ofReal_mul
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.smul_re RCLike.smul_re
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.smul_im RCLike.smul_im
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
#align is_R_or_C.norm_of_real RCLike.norm_ofReal
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.char_zero_R_or_C RCLike.charZero_rclike
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_re RCLike.I_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_im RCLike.I_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_im' RCLike.I_im'
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_mul_re RCLike.I_mul_re
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_mul_I RCLike.I_mul_I
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.conj_re RCLike.conj_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.conj_im RCLike.conj_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.conj_I RCLike.conj_I
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
#align is_R_or_C.conj_of_real RCLike.conj_ofReal
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
#noalign is_R_or_C.conj_bit0
#noalign is_R_or_C.conj_bit1
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : K)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (#10618): was a `simp` but `simp` can prove it
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.conj_neg_I RCLike.conj_neg_I
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align is_R_or_C.conj_eq_re_sub_im RCLike.conj_eq_re_sub_im
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
#align is_R_or_C.sub_conj RCLike.sub_conj
@[rclike_simps]
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 369 | 371 | theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by |
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
#align_import topology.uniform_space.uniform_convergence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2705404e701abc6b3127da906f40bae062a169c9"
/-!
# Uniform convergence
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` (with values in a metric space) converges uniformly on a set `s` to a
function `f` if, for all `ε > 0`, for all large enough `n`, one has for all `y ∈ s` the inequality
`dist (f y, Fₙ y) < ε`. Under uniform convergence, many properties of the `Fₙ` pass to the limit,
most notably continuity. We prove this in the file, defining the notion of uniform convergence
in the more general setting of uniform spaces, and with respect to an arbitrary indexing set
endowed with a filter (instead of just `ℕ` with `atTop`).
## Main results
Let `α` be a topological space, `β` a uniform space, `Fₙ` and `f` be functions from `α` to `β`
(where the index `n` belongs to an indexing type `ι` endowed with a filter `p`).
* `TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s`: the fact that `Fₙ` converges uniformly to `f` on `s`. This means
that, for any entourage `u` of the diagonal, for large enough `n` (with respect to `p`), one has
`(f y, Fₙ y) ∈ u` for all `y ∈ s`.
* `TendstoUniformly F f p`: same notion with `s = univ`.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.continuousOn`: a uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous
on this set is itself continuous on this set.
* `TendstoUniformly.continuous`: a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends
to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`.
* `TendstoUniformly.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`.
We also define notions where the convergence is locally uniform, called
`TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s` and `TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p`. The previous theorems
all have corresponding versions under locally uniform convergence.
Finally, we introduce the notion of a uniform Cauchy sequence, which is to uniform
convergence what a Cauchy sequence is to the usual notion of convergence.
## Implementation notes
We derive most of our initial results from an auxiliary definition `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter`.
This definition in and of itself can sometimes be useful, e.g., when studying the local behavior
of the `Fₙ` near a point, which would typically look like `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓝 x)`.
Still, while this may be the "correct" definition (see
`tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter`), it is somewhat unwieldy to work with in
practice. Thus, we provide the more traditional definition in `TendstoUniformlyOn`.
Most results hold under weaker assumptions of locally uniform approximation. In a first section,
we prove the results under these weaker assumptions. Then, we derive the results on uniform
convergence from them.
## Tags
Uniform limit, uniform convergence, tends uniformly to
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
{g : ι → α}
/-!
### Different notions of uniform convergence
We define uniform convergence and locally uniform convergence, on a set or in the whole space.
-/
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f`
with respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has
`p ×ˢ p'`-eventually `(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter TendstoUniformlyOnFilter
/--
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ p'` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `p'`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_iff_tendsto tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` with
respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly_on TendstoUniformlyOn
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
alias ⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn⟩ :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.tendsto_uniformly_on_filter TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.tendsto_uniformly_on TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ 𝓟 s` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `s`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set α} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect to a
filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x`. -/
def TendstoUniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly TendstoUniformly
-- Porting note: moved from below
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_univ : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p univ ↔ TendstoUniformly F f p := by
simp [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformly]
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_univ tendstoUniformlyOn_univ
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, principal_univ]
#align tendsto_uniformly_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by rwa [← tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
#align tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_uniformly_on_filter TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i (x : s) => F i x) (f ∘ (↑)) p :=
forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_comp_coe tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ ⊤` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
#align tendsto_uniformly_iff_tendsto tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto
/-- Uniform converence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hx : 𝓟 {x} ≤ p') : Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) := by
refine Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.mpr fun u hu => mem_map.mpr ?_
filter_upwards [(h u hu).curry]
intro i h
simpa using h.filter_mono hx
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.tendsto_at TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at
/-- Uniform converence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| hx)
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.tendsto_at TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_at
/-- Uniform converence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at le_top
#align tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_at TendstoUniformly.tendsto_at
-- Porting note: tendstoUniformlyOn_univ moved up
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p'' p' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left hp)
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.mono_left TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_left
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p'' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p.prod_mono_right hp)
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.mono_right TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.mono {s' : Set α} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s' :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr h'))
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.mono TendstoUniformlyOn.mono
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', F n.fst n.snd = F' n.fst n.snd) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f p p' := by
refine fun u hu => ((hf u hu).and hff').mono fun n h => ?_
rw [← h.right]
exact h.left
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.congr TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.congr
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n in p, Set.EqOn (F n) (F' n) s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at hf ⊢
refine hf.congr ?_
rw [eventually_iff] at hff' ⊢
simp only [Set.EqOn] at hff'
simp only [mem_prod_principal, hff', mem_setOf_eq]
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.congr TendstoUniformlyOn.congr
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr_right {g : α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hfg : EqOn f g s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F g p s := fun u hu => by
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with i hi a ha using hfg ha ▸ hi a ha
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.congr_right TendstoUniformlyOn.congr_right
protected theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOn (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ s)
#align tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_uniformly_on TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOn
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prod_map tendsto_comap)
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.comp TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [TendstoUniformlyOn, comap_principal] using TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp h g
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.comp TendstoUniformlyOn.comp
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.comp (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformly (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [principal_univ, comap_principal] using h.comp g
#align tendsto_uniformly.comp TendstoUniformly.comp
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p p' := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
#align uniform_continuous.comp_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p s := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
#align uniform_continuous.comp_tendsto_uniformly_on UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformly (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
#align uniform_continuous.comp_tendsto_uniformly UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod_map {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {q : Filter ι'} {q' : Filter α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q q') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f')
(p ×ˢ q) (p' ×ˢ q') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h h' ⊢
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, ← map_swap4_prod, tendsto_map'_iff]
convert h.prod_map h' -- seems to be faster than `exact` here
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.prod_map TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod_map
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prod_map {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s') :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p')
(s ×ˢ s') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h h' ⊢
simpa only [prod_principal_principal] using h.prod_map h'
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.prod_map TendstoUniformlyOn.prod_map
theorem TendstoUniformly.prod_map {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p') := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, ← univ_prod_univ] at *
exact h.prod_map h'
#align tendsto_uniformly.prod_map TendstoUniformly.prod_map
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {q : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p ×ˢ q) p' :=
fun u hu => ((h.prod_map h') u hu).diag_of_prod_right
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.prod TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'} {f' : α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p.prod p') s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prod_map h').comp fun a => (a, a))
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.prod TendstoUniformlyOn.prod
theorem TendstoUniformly.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'} {f' : α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p ×ˢ p') :=
(h.prod_map h').comp fun a => (a, a)
#align tendsto_uniformly.prod TendstoUniformly.prod
/-- Uniform convergence on a filter `p'` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ p'`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_filter_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F (fun _ => c) p p' := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]
rfl
#align tendsto_prod_filter_iff tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence on a set `s` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ 𝓟 s`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_principal_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOn F (fun _ => c) p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
#align tendsto_prod_principal_iff tendsto_prod_principal_iff
/-- Uniform convergence to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in `p ×ˢ ⊤`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_top_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformly F (fun _ => c) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
#align tendsto_prod_top_iff tendsto_prod_top_iff
/-- Uniform convergence on the empty set is vacuously true -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_empty : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p ∅ := fun u _ => by simp
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_empty tendstoUniformlyOn_empty
/-- Uniform convergence on a singleton is equivalent to regular convergence -/
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 349 | 352 | theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_singleton_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p {x} ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x)) := by |
simp_rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right, tendsto_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp [mem_prod_principal, preimage]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs products, sums, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, sum, disjoint union, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
#align mem_nhds_subtype mem_nhds_subtype
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
#align nhds_subtype nhds_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
#align nhds_within_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_ne_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align discrete_topology_subtype_iff discreteTopology_subtype_iff
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
#align cofinite_topology CofiniteTopology
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
#align cofinite_topology.of CofiniteTopology.of
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff' CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff'
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
#align cofinite_topology.is_closed_iff CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
#align cofinite_topology.nhds_eq CofiniteTopology.nhds_eq
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
#align cofinite_topology.mem_nhds_iff CofiniteTopology.mem_nhds_iff
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
[TopologicalSpace ε] [TopologicalSpace ζ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean 4 fails to deduce implicit args
@[simp] theorem continuous_prod_mk {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} :
(Continuous fun x => (f x, g x)) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
(@continuous_inf_rng X (Y × Z) _ _ (TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _)).trans <|
continuous_induced_rng.and continuous_induced_rng
#align continuous_prod_mk continuous_prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_fst : Continuous (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).1
#align continuous_fst continuous_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.fst {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).1 :=
continuous_fst.comp hf
#align continuous.fst Continuous.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.fst' {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.fst :=
hf.comp continuous_fst
#align continuous.fst' Continuous.fst'
theorem continuousAt_fst {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.fst p :=
continuous_fst.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_fst continuousAt_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.fst {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).1) x :=
continuousAt_fst.comp hf
#align continuous_at.fst ContinuousAt.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst' {f : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst' ContinuousAt.fst'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst'' {f : X → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.fst) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst'' ContinuousAt.fst''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).1) l (𝓝 <| p.1) :=
continuousAt_fst.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_snd : Continuous (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).2
#align continuous_snd continuous_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.snd {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).2 :=
continuous_snd.comp hf
#align continuous.snd Continuous.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.snd' {f : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.snd :=
hf.comp continuous_snd
#align continuous.snd' Continuous.snd'
theorem continuousAt_snd {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.snd p :=
continuous_snd.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_snd continuousAt_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.snd {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).2) x :=
continuousAt_snd.comp hf
#align continuous_at.snd ContinuousAt.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd' {f : Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd' ContinuousAt.snd'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd'' {f : Y → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.snd) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd'' ContinuousAt.snd''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).2) l (𝓝 <| p.2) :=
continuousAt_snd.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.prod_mk {f : Z → X} {g : Z → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => (f x, g x) :=
continuous_prod_mk.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.prod_mk Continuous.prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk (x : X) : Continuous fun y : Y => (x, y) :=
continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align continuous.prod.mk Continuous.Prod.mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk_left (y : Y) : Continuous fun x : X => (x, y) :=
continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const
#align continuous.prod.mk_left Continuous.Prod.mk_left
/-- If `f x y` is continuous in `x` for all `y ∈ s`,
then the set of `x` such that `f x` maps `s` to `t` is closed. -/
lemma IsClosed.setOf_mapsTo {α : Type*} {f : X → α → Z} {s : Set α} {t : Set Z} (ht : IsClosed t)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Continuous (f · a)) : IsClosed {x | MapsTo (f x) s t} := by
simpa only [MapsTo, setOf_forall] using isClosed_biInter fun y hy ↦ ht.preimage (hf y hy)
theorem Continuous.comp₂ {g : X × Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w) :=
hg.comp <| he.prod_mk hf
#align continuous.comp₂ Continuous.comp₂
theorem Continuous.comp₃ {g : X × Y × Z → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) :
Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w) :=
hg.comp₂ he <| hf.prod_mk hk
#align continuous.comp₃ Continuous.comp₃
theorem Continuous.comp₄ {g : X × Y × Z × ζ → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) {l : W → ζ}
(hl : Continuous l) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w, l w) :=
hg.comp₃ he hf <| hk.prod_mk hl
#align continuous.comp₄ Continuous.comp₄
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.prod_map {f : Z → X} {g : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun p : Z × W => (f p.1, g p.2) :=
hf.fst'.prod_mk hg.snd'
#align continuous.prod_map Continuous.prod_map
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta1; haveI := tb1; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta1 tb1 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_left₂ continuous_inf_dom_left₂
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta2; haveI := tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta2 tb2 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_right₂ continuous_inf_dom_right₂
/-- A version of `continuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_sInf_dom₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {tas : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
{tbs : Set (TopologicalSpace Y)} {tX : TopologicalSpace X} {tY : TopologicalSpace Y}
{tc : TopologicalSpace Z} (hX : tX ∈ tas) (hY : tY ∈ tbs)
(hf : Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf tas; haveI := sInf tbs;
exact @Continuous _ _ _ tc fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have hX := continuous_sInf_dom hX continuous_id
have hY := continuous_sInf_dom hY continuous_id
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ tX tY (sInf tas) (sInf tbs) _ _ hX hY
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_continuous_id
#align continuous_Inf_dom₂ continuous_sInf_dom₂
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds {p : X → Prop} {x : X} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (y : Y) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).1 :=
continuousAt_fst h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds {p : Y → Prop} {y : Y} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).2 :=
continuousAt_snd h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds {px : X → Prop} {x} (hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, px x) {py : Y → Prop}
{y} (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, py y) : ∀ᶠ p in 𝓝 (x, y), px (p : X × Y).1 ∧ py p.2 :=
(hx.prod_inl_nhds y).and (hy.prod_inr_nhds x)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds
theorem continuous_swap : Continuous (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) :=
continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst
#align continuous_swap continuous_swap
lemma isClosedMap_swap : IsClosedMap (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) := fun s hs ↦ by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
exact hs.preimage continuous_swap
theorem Continuous.uncurry_left {f : X → Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous (f x) :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk _)
#align continuous_uncurry_left Continuous.uncurry_left
theorem Continuous.uncurry_right {f : X → Y → Z} (y : Y) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous fun a => f a y :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk_left _)
#align continuous_uncurry_right Continuous.uncurry_right
-- 2024-03-09
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_left := Continuous.uncurry_left
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_right := Continuous.uncurry_right
theorem continuous_curry {g : X × Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous g) : Continuous (curry g x) :=
Continuous.uncurry_left x h
#align continuous_curry continuous_curry
theorem IsOpen.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).inter (ht.preimage continuous_snd)
#align is_open.prod IsOpen.prod
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean fails to find `t₁` and `t₂` by unification
theorem nhds_prod_eq {x : X} {y : Y} : 𝓝 (x, y) = 𝓝 x ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, instTopologicalSpaceProd, nhds_inf (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _), nhds_induced, nhds_induced]
#align nhds_prod_eq nhds_prod_eq
-- Porting note: moved from `Topology.ContinuousOn`
theorem nhdsWithin_prod_eq (x : X) (y : Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (x, y) = 𝓝[s] x ×ˢ 𝓝[t] y := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
#align nhds_within_prod_eq nhdsWithin_prod_eq
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝 y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff mem_nhds_prod_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} {tx : Set X} {ty : Set Y} :
s ∈ 𝓝[tx ×ˢ ty] (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[tx] x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝[ty] y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds {ιX ιY : Type*} {px : ιX → Prop} {py : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : (𝓝 x).HasBasis px sx)
(hy : (𝓝 y).HasBasis py sy) :
(𝓝 (x, y)).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => px i.1 ∧ py i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact hx.prod hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds' {ιX ιY : Type*} {pX : ιX → Prop} {pY : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {p : X × Y} (hx : (𝓝 p.1).HasBasis pX sx)
(hy : (𝓝 p.2).HasBasis pY sy) :
(𝓝 p).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => pX i.1 ∧ pY i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 :=
hx.prod_nhds hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds' Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds'
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff' {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).prod_nhds (nhds_basis_opens y)).mem_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Prod.exists, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff' mem_nhds_prod_iff'
theorem Prod.tendsto_iff {X} (seq : X → Y × Z) {f : Filter X} (p : Y × Z) :
Tendsto seq f (𝓝 p) ↔
Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).fst) f (𝓝 p.fst) ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).snd) f (𝓝 p.snd) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.tendsto_prod_iff']
#align prod.tendsto_iff Prod.tendsto_iff
instance [DiscreteTopology X] [DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X × Y) :=
discreteTopology_iff_nhds.2 fun (a, b) => by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete X, nhds_discrete Y, prod_pure_pure]
theorem prod_mem_nhds_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 y := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_mem_prod_iff]
#align prod_mem_nhds_iff prod_mem_nhds_iff
theorem prod_mem_nhds {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hy : t ∈ 𝓝 y) :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) :=
prod_mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
#align prod_mem_nhds prod_mem_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds : IsOpen { p : X × X | Disjoint (𝓝 p.1) (𝓝 p.2) } := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall, mem_setOf_eq]
intro x y h
obtain ⟨U, hU, V, hV, hd⟩ := ((nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y)).mp h
exact mem_nhds_prod_iff'.mpr ⟨U, V, hU.2, hU.1, hV.2, hV.1, fun ⟨x', y'⟩ ⟨hx', hy'⟩ =>
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem hd (hU.2.mem_nhds hx') (hV.2.mem_nhds hy')⟩
#align is_open_set_of_disjoint_nhds_nhds isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, q y) : ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x, y), p z.1 ∧ q z.2 :=
prod_mem_nhds hx hy
#align filter.eventually.prod_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds
theorem nhds_swap (x : X) (y : Y) : 𝓝 (x, y) = (𝓝 (y, x)).map Prod.swap := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.prod_comm, nhds_prod_eq]; rfl
#align nhds_swap nhds_swap
theorem Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds {γ} {x : X} {y : Y} {f : Filter γ} {mx : γ → X} {my : γ → Y}
(hx : Tendsto mx f (𝓝 x)) (hy : Tendsto my f (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun c => (mx c, my c)) f (𝓝 (x, y)) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk hx hy
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds {p : X × Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p x) : ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ y' in 𝓝 y, p (x', y') := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq] at h
exact h.curry
#align filter.eventually.curry_nhds Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.prod {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
hf.prod_mk_nhds hg
#align continuous_at.prod ContinuousAt.prod
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {p : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f p.fst)
(hg : ContinuousAt g p.snd) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) p :=
hf.fst''.prod hg.snd''
#align continuous_at.prod_map ContinuousAt.prod_map
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map' {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) (x, y) :=
hf.fst'.prod hg.snd'
#align continuous_at.prod_map' ContinuousAt.prod_map'
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂ {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf (hg.prod hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_of_eq {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y × Z}
(hf : ContinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂ hg hh
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their first argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_left {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {y : Y} :
Continuous fun x ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
alias Continuous.along_fst := Continuous.curry_left
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their second argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_right {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {x : X} :
Continuous fun y ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
alias Continuous.along_snd := Continuous.curry_right
-- todo: prove a version of `generateFrom_union` with `image2 (∩) s t` in the LHS and use it here
theorem prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq {X Y : Type*} {s : Set (Set X)} {t : Set (Set Y)}
(hs : ⋃₀ s = univ) (ht : ⋃₀ t = univ) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Y (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t) :=
let G := generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t)
le_antisymm
(le_generateFrom fun g ⟨u, hu, v, hv, g_eq⟩ =>
g_eq.symm ▸
@IsOpen.prod _ _ (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) _ _ (GenerateOpen.basic _ hu)
(GenerateOpen.basic _ hv))
(le_inf
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun u hu =>
have : ⋃ v ∈ t, u ×ˢ v = Prod.fst ⁻¹' u := by
simp_rw [← prod_iUnion, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, ht, prod_univ]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.fst ⁻¹' u) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun v =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hv => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun v hv =>
have : ⋃ u ∈ s, u ×ˢ v = Prod.snd ⁻¹' v := by
simp_rw [← iUnion_prod_const, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, hs, univ_prod]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.snd ⁻¹' v) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun u =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hu => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩))
#align prod_generate_from_generate_from_eq prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq
-- todo: use the previous lemma?
theorem prod_eq_generateFrom :
instTopologicalSpaceProd =
generateFrom { g | ∃ (s : Set X) (t : Set Y), IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ g = s ×ˢ t } :=
le_antisymm (le_generateFrom fun g ⟨s, t, hs, ht, g_eq⟩ => g_eq.symm ▸ hs.prod ht)
(le_inf
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨t, univ, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩)
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨univ, t, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩))
#align prod_eq_generate_from prod_eq_generateFrom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: align with `mem_nhds_prod_iff'`
theorem isOpen_prod_iff {s : Set (X × Y)} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s →
∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ a ∈ u ∧ b ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.trans <| by simp_rw [Prod.forall, mem_nhds_prod_iff', and_left_comm]
#align is_open_prod_iff isOpen_prod_iff
/-- A product of induced topologies is induced by the product map -/
theorem prod_induced_induced (f : X → Y) (g : Z → W) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Z (induced f ‹_›) (induced g ‹_›) =
induced (fun p => (f p.1, g p.2)) instTopologicalSpaceProd := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceProd
simp_rw [induced_inf, induced_compose]
rfl
#align prod_induced_induced prod_induced_induced
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology_left
/-- Given a neighborhood `s` of `(x, x)`, then `(x, x)` has a square open neighborhood
that is a subset of `s`. -/
theorem exists_nhds_square {s : Set (X × X)} {x : X} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 (x, x)) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ U ×ˢ U ⊆ s := by
simpa [nhds_prod_eq, (nhds_basis_opens x).prod_self.mem_iff, and_assoc, and_left_comm] using hx
#align exists_nhds_square exists_nhds_square
/-- `Prod.fst` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}`
to `𝓝 x.1`. -/
theorem map_fst_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝[Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}] x) = 𝓝 x.1 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_fst.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hu fun z hz => H _ hz _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hv) rfl
#align map_fst_nhds_within map_fst_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.1 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_fst <| (map_fst_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_fst_nhds map_fst_nhds
/-- The first projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_fst : IsOpenMap (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_fst_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_fst isOpenMap_fst
/-- `Prod.snd` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}`
to `𝓝 x.2`. -/
theorem map_snd_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝[Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}] x) = 𝓝 x.2 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_snd.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hv fun z hz => H _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hu) _ hz rfl
#align map_snd_nhds_within map_snd_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.2 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_snd <| (map_snd_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_snd_nhds map_snd_nhds
/-- The second projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_snd : IsOpenMap (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_snd_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_snd isOpenMap_snd
/-- A product set is open in a product space if and only if each factor is open, or one of them is
empty -/
theorem isOpen_prod_iff' {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} :
IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) ↔ IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
· have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := prod_nonempty_iff.1 h
constructor
· intro (H : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t))
refine Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· show IsOpen s
rw [← fst_image_prod s st.2]
exact isOpenMap_fst _ H
· show IsOpen t
rw [← snd_image_prod st.1 t]
exact isOpenMap_snd _ H
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, not_false_iff, or_false_iff] at H
exact H.1.prod H.2
#align is_open_prod_iff' isOpen_prod_iff'
theorem closure_prod_eq {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} : closure (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ closure t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
simp_rw [mem_prod, mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_prod_eq, prod_neBot]
#align closure_prod_eq closure_prod_eq
theorem interior_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) : interior (s ×ˢ t) = interior s ×ˢ interior t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp only [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_prod, prod_mem_nhds_iff]
#align interior_prod_eq interior_prod_eq
theorem frontier_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
frontier (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ˢ closure t := by
simp only [frontier, closure_prod_eq, interior_prod_eq, prod_diff_prod]
#align frontier_prod_eq frontier_prod_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_prod_univ_eq (s : Set X) :
frontier (s ×ˢ (univ : Set Y)) = frontier s ×ˢ univ := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_prod_univ_eq frontier_prod_univ_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ_prod_eq (s : Set Y) :
frontier ((univ : Set X) ×ˢ s) = univ ×ˢ frontier s := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_univ_prod_eq frontier_univ_prod_eq
theorem map_mem_closure₂ {f : X → Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {u : Set Z}
(hf : Continuous (uncurry f)) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure t)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b ∈ u) : f x y ∈ closure u :=
have H₁ : (x, y) ∈ closure (s ×ˢ t) := by simpa only [closure_prod_eq] using mk_mem_prod hx hy
have H₂ : MapsTo (uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) u := forall_prod_set.2 h
H₂.closure hf H₁
#align map_mem_closure₂ map_mem_closure₂
theorem IsClosed.prod {s₁ : Set X} {s₂ : Set Y} (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) :
IsClosed (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
closure_eq_iff_isClosed.mp <| by simp only [h₁.closure_eq, h₂.closure_eq, closure_prod_eq]
#align is_closed.prod IsClosed.prod
/-- The product of two dense sets is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) : Dense (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun x => by
rw [closure_prod_eq]
exact ⟨hs x.1, ht x.2⟩
#align dense.prod Dense.prod
/-- If `f` and `g` are maps with dense range, then `Prod.map f g` has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.prod_map {ι : Type*} {κ : Type*} {f : ι → Y} {g : κ → Z} (hf : DenseRange f)
(hg : DenseRange g) : DenseRange (Prod.map f g) := by
simpa only [DenseRange, prod_range_range_eq] using hf.prod hg
#align dense_range.prod_map DenseRange.prod_map
theorem Inducing.prod_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Inducing f) (hg : Inducing g) :
Inducing (Prod.map f g) :=
inducing_iff_nhds.2 fun (x, z) => by simp_rw [Prod.map_def, nhds_prod_eq, hf.nhds_eq_comap,
hg.nhds_eq_comap, prod_comap_comap_eq]
#align inducing.prod_mk Inducing.prod_map
@[simp]
theorem inducing_const_prod {x : X} {f : Y → Z} : (Inducing fun x' => (x, f x')) ↔ Inducing f := by
simp_rw [inducing_iff, instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose, Function.comp,
induced_const, top_inf_eq]
#align inducing_const_prod inducing_const_prod
@[simp]
theorem inducing_prod_const {y : Y} {f : X → Z} : (Inducing fun x => (f x, y)) ↔ Inducing f := by
simp_rw [inducing_iff, instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose, Function.comp,
induced_const, inf_top_eq]
#align inducing_prod_const inducing_prod_const
theorem Embedding.prod_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Embedding f) (hg : Embedding g) :
Embedding (Prod.map f g) :=
{ hf.toInducing.prod_map hg.toInducing with
inj := fun ⟨x₁, z₁⟩ ⟨x₂, z₂⟩ => by simp [hf.inj.eq_iff, hg.inj.eq_iff] }
#align embedding.prod_mk Embedding.prod_map
protected theorem IsOpenMap.prod {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hg : IsOpenMap g) :
IsOpenMap fun p : X × Z => (f p.1, g p.2) := by
rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le]
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_prod_eq, ← Filter.prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono (hf.nhds_le a) (hg.nhds_le b)
#align is_open_map.prod IsOpenMap.prod
protected theorem OpenEmbedding.prod {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : OpenEmbedding f)
(hg : OpenEmbedding g) : OpenEmbedding fun x : X × Z => (f x.1, g x.2) :=
openEmbedding_of_embedding_open (hf.1.prod_map hg.1) (hf.isOpenMap.prod hg.isOpenMap)
#align open_embedding.prod OpenEmbedding.prod
theorem embedding_graph {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Embedding fun x => (x, f x) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (continuous_id.prod_mk hf) continuous_fst embedding_id
#align embedding_graph embedding_graph
theorem embedding_prod_mk (x : X) : Embedding (Prod.mk x : Y → X × Y) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (Continuous.Prod.mk x) continuous_snd embedding_id
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Sum
open Sum
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
theorem continuous_sum_dom {f : X ⊕ Y → Z} :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∧ Continuous (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
(continuous_sup_dom (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.coinduced Sum.inl _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.coinduced Sum.inr _)).trans <|
continuous_coinduced_dom.and continuous_coinduced_dom
#align continuous_sum_dom continuous_sum_dom
theorem continuous_sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} :
Continuous (Sum.elim f g) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
continuous_sum_dom
#align continuous_sum_elim continuous_sum_elim
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (Sum.elim f g) :=
continuous_sum_elim.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.sum_elim Continuous.sum_elim
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_isLeft : Continuous (isLeft : X ⊕ Y → Bool) :=
continuous_sum_dom.2 ⟨continuous_const, continuous_const⟩
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_isRight : Continuous (isRight : X ⊕ Y → Bool) :=
continuous_sum_dom.2 ⟨continuous_const, continuous_const⟩
@[continuity]
-- Porting note: the proof was `continuous_sup_rng_left continuous_coinduced_rng`
theorem continuous_inl : Continuous (@inl X Y) := ⟨fun _ => And.left⟩
#align continuous_inl continuous_inl
@[continuity]
-- Porting note: the proof was `continuous_sup_rng_right continuous_coinduced_rng`
theorem continuous_inr : Continuous (@inr X Y) := ⟨fun _ => And.right⟩
#align continuous_inr continuous_inr
theorem isOpen_sum_iff {s : Set (X ⊕ Y)} : IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen (inl ⁻¹' s) ∧ IsOpen (inr ⁻¹' s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_sum_iff isOpen_sum_iff
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem isClosed_sum_iff {s : Set (X ⊕ Y)} :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed (inl ⁻¹' s) ∧ IsClosed (inr ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_compl]
theorem isOpenMap_inl : IsOpenMap (@inl X Y) := fun u hu => by
simpa [isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_image_eq u Sum.inl_injective]
#align is_open_map_inl isOpenMap_inl
theorem isOpenMap_inr : IsOpenMap (@inr X Y) := fun u hu => by
simpa [isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_image_eq u Sum.inr_injective]
#align is_open_map_inr isOpenMap_inr
theorem openEmbedding_inl : OpenEmbedding (@inl X Y) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_inl inl_injective isOpenMap_inl
#align open_embedding_inl openEmbedding_inl
theorem openEmbedding_inr : OpenEmbedding (@inr X Y) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_inr inr_injective isOpenMap_inr
#align open_embedding_inr openEmbedding_inr
theorem embedding_inl : Embedding (@inl X Y) :=
openEmbedding_inl.1
#align embedding_inl embedding_inl
theorem embedding_inr : Embedding (@inr X Y) :=
openEmbedding_inr.1
#align embedding_inr embedding_inr
theorem isOpen_range_inl : IsOpen (range (inl : X → X ⊕ Y)) :=
openEmbedding_inl.2
#align is_open_range_inl isOpen_range_inl
theorem isOpen_range_inr : IsOpen (range (inr : Y → X ⊕ Y)) :=
openEmbedding_inr.2
#align is_open_range_inr isOpen_range_inr
theorem isClosed_range_inl : IsClosed (range (inl : X → X ⊕ Y)) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_range_inl]
exact isOpen_range_inr
#align is_closed_range_inl isClosed_range_inl
theorem isClosed_range_inr : IsClosed (range (inr : Y → X ⊕ Y)) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_range_inr]
exact isOpen_range_inl
#align is_closed_range_inr isClosed_range_inr
theorem closedEmbedding_inl : ClosedEmbedding (inl : X → X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨embedding_inl, isClosed_range_inl⟩
#align closed_embedding_inl closedEmbedding_inl
theorem closedEmbedding_inr : ClosedEmbedding (inr : Y → X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨embedding_inr, isClosed_range_inr⟩
#align closed_embedding_inr closedEmbedding_inr
theorem nhds_inl (x : X) : 𝓝 (inl x : X ⊕ Y) = map inl (𝓝 x) :=
(openEmbedding_inl.map_nhds_eq _).symm
#align nhds_inl nhds_inl
theorem nhds_inr (y : Y) : 𝓝 (inr y : X ⊕ Y) = map inr (𝓝 y) :=
(openEmbedding_inr.map_nhds_eq _).symm
#align nhds_inr nhds_inr
@[simp]
theorem continuous_sum_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} :
Continuous (Sum.map f g) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
continuous_sum_elim.trans <|
embedding_inl.continuous_iff.symm.and embedding_inr.continuous_iff.symm
#align continuous_sum_map continuous_sum_map
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.sum_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (Sum.map f g) :=
continuous_sum_map.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.sum_map Continuous.sum_map
theorem isOpenMap_sum {f : X ⊕ Y → Z} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ (IsOpenMap fun a => f (inl a)) ∧ IsOpenMap fun b => f (inr b) := by
simp only [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Sum.forall, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, Filter.map_map, comp]
#align is_open_map_sum isOpenMap_sum
@[simp]
theorem isOpenMap_sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} :
IsOpenMap (Sum.elim f g) ↔ IsOpenMap f ∧ IsOpenMap g := by
simp only [isOpenMap_sum, elim_inl, elim_inr]
#align is_open_map_sum_elim isOpenMap_sum_elim
theorem IsOpenMap.sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hg : IsOpenMap g) :
IsOpenMap (Sum.elim f g) :=
isOpenMap_sum_elim.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align is_open_map.sum_elim IsOpenMap.sum_elim
end Sum
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] {p : X → Prop}
theorem inducing_subtype_val {t : Set Y} : Inducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
#align inducing_coe inducing_subtype_val
theorem Inducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : Inducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : Inducing f :=
inducing_subtype_val.comp h
#align inducing.of_cod_restrict Inducing.of_codRestrict
theorem embedding_subtype_val : Embedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨inducing_subtype_val, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
#align embedding_subtype_coe embedding_subtype_val
theorem closedEmbedding_subtype_val (h : IsClosed { a | p a }) :
ClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨embedding_subtype_val, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
#align closed_embedding_subtype_coe closedEmbedding_subtype_val
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
#align continuous_subtype_val continuous_subtype_val
#align continuous_subtype_coe continuous_subtype_val
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
#align continuous.subtype_coe Continuous.subtype_val
theorem IsOpen.openEmbedding_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
OpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨embedding_subtype_val, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
#align is_open.open_embedding_subtype_coe IsOpen.openEmbedding_subtype_val
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.openEmbedding_subtype_val.isOpenMap
#align is_open.is_open_map_subtype_coe IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
#align is_open_map.restrict IsOpenMap.restrict
nonrec theorem IsClosed.closedEmbedding_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
ClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
closedEmbedding_subtype_val hs
#align is_closed.closed_embedding_subtype_coe IsClosed.closedEmbedding_subtype_val
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
#align continuous.subtype_mk Continuous.subtype_mk
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
#align continuous.subtype_map Continuous.subtype_map
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
#align continuous_inclusion continuous_inclusion
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_subtype_coe continuousAt_subtype_val
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [inducing_subtype_val.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
#align subtype.dense_iff Subtype.dense_iff
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [inducing_subtype_val.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
#align map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
#align nhds_subtype_eq_comap nhds_subtype_eq_comap
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
#align tendsto_subtype_rng tendsto_subtype_rng
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
#align closure_subtype closure_subtype
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
inducing_subtype_val.continuousAt_iff
#align continuous_at_cod_restrict_iff continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
#align continuous_at.cod_restrict ContinuousAt.codRestrict
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
#align continuous_at.restrict ContinuousAt.restrict
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
#align continuous_at.restrict_preimage ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
#align continuous.cod_restrict Continuous.codRestrict
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
theorem Inducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : Inducing e) {s : Set Y} (hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) :
Inducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
inducing_of_inducing_compose (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val he
#align inducing.cod_restrict Inducing.codRestrict
theorem Embedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : Embedding e) (s : Set Y) (hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) :
Embedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val he
#align embedding.cod_restrict Embedding.codRestrict
theorem embedding_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Embedding (inclusion h) :=
embedding_subtype_val.codRestrict _ _
#align embedding_inclusion embedding_inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(embedding_inclusion ts).discreteTopology
#align discrete_topology.of_subset DiscreteTopology.of_subset
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem quotientMap_quot_mk : QuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
#align quotient_map_quot_mk quotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
#align continuous_quot_mk continuous_quot_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
#align continuous_quot_lift continuous_quot_lift
theorem quotientMap_quotient_mk' : QuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
quotientMap_quot_mk
#align quotient_map_quotient_mk quotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
#align continuous_quotient_mk continuous_quotient_mk'
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
#align continuous.quotient_lift Continuous.quotient_lift
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, @Setoid.r _ s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
#align continuous.quotient_lift_on' Continuous.quotient_liftOn'
@[continuity] theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
#align continuous.quotient_map' Continuous.quotient_map'
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp]
#align continuous_pi_iff continuous_pi_iff
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
#align continuous_pi continuous_pi
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
#align continuous_apply continuous_apply
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
#align continuous_apply_apply continuous_apply_apply
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
#align continuous_at_apply continuousAt_apply
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.apply Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds
theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
#align nhds_pi nhds_pi
theorem tendsto_pi_nhds {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {g : ∀ i, π i} {u : Filter Y} :
Tendsto f u (𝓝 g) ↔ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun i => f i x) u (𝓝 (g x)) := by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.tendsto_pi]
#align tendsto_pi_nhds tendsto_pi_nhds
theorem continuousAt_pi {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
#align continuous_at_pi continuousAt_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_pi' {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 hf
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
continuous_pi fun j ↦ continuous_apply (φ j)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → X) → (ι' → X)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' φ
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp' {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{g : ∀ i, π i → X i} (hg : ∀ i, Continuous (g i)) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| continuous_apply i
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : X → Y} (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (g ∘ · : (ι → X) → (ι → Y)) :=
Pi.continuous_postcomp' fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.induced_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) (T (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, comp]
lemma Pi.induced_precomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (· ∘ φ) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) ‹TopologicalSpace Y› :=
induced_precomp' φ
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
Continuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, π i) → (∀ i : S, π i)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι)
lemma Pi.induced_restrict (S : Set ι) :
induced (S.restrict) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i ∈ S, induced (eval i) (T i) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [← iInf_subtype'', ← induced_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι),
restrict]
lemma Pi.induced_restrict_sUnion (𝔖 : Set (Set ι)) :
induced (⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict (Pi.topologicalSpace (Y := fun i : (⋃₀ 𝔖) ↦ π i)) =
⨅ S ∈ 𝔖, induced S.restrict Pi.topologicalSpace := by
simp_rw [Pi.induced_restrict, iInf_sUnion]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.update [DecidableEq ι] {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) {g : Y → π i} {xi : π i} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 xi)) :
Tendsto (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) l (𝓝 <| update x i xi) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => by rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*, hf.apply_nhds]
#align filter.tendsto.update Filter.Tendsto.update
theorem ContinuousAt.update [DecidableEq ι] {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.update i hg
#align continuous_at.update ContinuousAt.update
theorem Continuous.update [DecidableEq ι] (hf : Continuous f) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => update (f a) i (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.update i hg.continuousAt
#align continuous.update Continuous.update
/-- `Function.update f i x` is continuous in `(f, x)`. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_update [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun f : (∀ j, π j) × π i => update f.1 i f.2 :=
continuous_fst.update i continuous_snd
#align continuous_update continuous_update
/-- `Pi.mulSingle i x` is continuous in `x`. -/
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore @[continuity]
@[to_additive "`Pi.single i x` is continuous in `x`."]
theorem continuous_mulSingle [∀ i, One (π i)] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun x => (Pi.mulSingle i x : ∀ i, π i) :=
continuous_const.update _ continuous_id
#align continuous_mul_single continuous_mulSingle
#align continuous_single continuous_single
theorem Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : Y → π i} {l : Filter Y} {x : π i} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x))
{g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {y : ∀ j, π (i.succAbove j)} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| i.insertNth x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.succAboveCases i (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
#align filter.tendsto.fin_insert_nth Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth
theorem ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
{g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.fin_insertNth i hg
#align continuous_at.fin_insert_nth ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth
theorem Continuous.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} (hf : Continuous f) {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.fin_insertNth i hg.continuousAt
#align continuous.fin_insert_nth Continuous.fin_insertNth
theorem isOpen_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) : IsOpen (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact hi.isOpen_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
#align is_open_set_pi isOpen_set_pi
theorem isOpen_pi_iff {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ (I : Finset ι) (u : ∀ a, Set (π a)),
(∀ a, a ∈ I → IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ (I : Set ι).pi u ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => eval a '' (I : Set ι).pi fun a => (h1 a).choose, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [eval_image_pi (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hi)
(pi_nonempty_iff.mpr fun i => ⟨_, fun _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.2.2⟩)]
exact (h1 i).choose_spec.2
· exact Subset.trans
(pi_mono fun i hi => (eval_image_pi_subset hi).trans (h1 i).choose_spec.1) h2
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => ite (a ∈ I) (t a) univ, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· use t i
simp_rw [if_pos hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, (h1 i) hi⟩
· use univ
simp_rw [if_neg hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, isOpen_univ, mem_univ _⟩
· rw [← univ_pi_ite]
simp only [← ite_and, ← Finset.mem_coe, and_self_iff, univ_pi_ite, h2]
#align is_open_pi_iff isOpen_pi_iff
theorem isOpen_pi_iff' [Finite ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ u : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ univ.pi u ⊆ s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose,
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose_spec.2,
(pi_mono fun i _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.1).trans (Subset.trans ?_ h2)⟩⟩
rw [← pi_inter_compl (I : Set ι)]
exact inter_subset_left
· exact fun ⟨u, ⟨h1, _⟩⟩ =>
⟨Finset.univ, u, ⟨fun i => ⟨u i, ⟨rfl.subset, h1 i⟩⟩, by rwa [Finset.coe_univ]⟩⟩
#align is_open_pi_iff' isOpen_pi_iff'
theorem isClosed_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsClosed (s a)) :
IsClosed (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact isClosed_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
#align is_closed_set_pi isClosed_set_pi
theorem mem_nhds_of_pi_mem_nhds {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) (hs : I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a)
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ I) : s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi] at hs; exact mem_of_pi_mem_pi hs hi
#align mem_nhds_of_pi_mem_nhds mem_nhds_of_pi_mem_nhds
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ 𝓝 (x a)) : pi i s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [pi_def, biInter_mem hi]
exact fun a ha => (continuous_apply a).continuousAt (hs a ha)
#align set_pi_mem_nhds set_pi_mem_nhds
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) :
I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∀ i : ι, i ∈ I → s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi, pi_mem_pi_iff hI]
#align set_pi_mem_nhds_iff set_pi_mem_nhds_iff
theorem interior_pi_set {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
interior (pi I s) = I.pi fun i => interior (s i) := by
ext a
simp only [Set.mem_pi, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, set_pi_mem_nhds_iff hI]
#align interior_pi_set interior_pi_set
theorem exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds [DecidableEq ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (y : ∀ a, π a) : ∃ I : Finset ι, I.piecewise x y ∈ s := by
simp only [nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi'] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨I, t, htx, hts⟩
refine ⟨I, hts fun i hi => ?_⟩
simpa [Finset.mem_coe.1 hi] using mem_of_mem_nhds (htx i)
#align exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom
{ t | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi (↑i) s } := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· apply le_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨s, i, hi, rfl⟩
letI := fun a => generateFrom (g a)
exact isOpen_set_pi i.finite_toSet (fun a ha => GenerateOpen.basic _ (hi a ha))
· refine le_iInf fun i => coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 <| le_generateFrom fun s hs => ?_
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨update (fun i => univ) i s, {i}, ?_⟩
simp [hs]
#align pi_generate_from_eq pi_generateFrom_eq
theorem pi_eq_generateFrom :
Pi.topologicalSpace =
generateFrom
{ g | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) ∧ g = pi (↑i) s } :=
calc Pi.topologicalSpace
_ = @Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom { s | IsOpen s } := by
simp only [generateFrom_setOf_isOpen]
_ = _ := pi_generateFrom_eq
#align pi_eq_generate_from pi_eq_generateFrom
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq_finite {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} [Finite ι]
(hg : ∀ a, ⋃₀ g a = univ) :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s } := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [pi_generateFrom_eq]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti ?_) (le_generateFrom ?_)
· exact fun s ⟨t, ht, Eq⟩ => ⟨t, Finset.univ, by simp [ht, Eq]⟩
· rintro s ⟨t, i, ht, rfl⟩
letI := generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s }
refine isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open.2 fun f hf => ?_
choose c hcg hfc using fun a => sUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (hg a) (f a)
refine ⟨pi i t ∩ pi ((↑i)ᶜ : Set ι) c, inter_subset_left, ?_, ⟨hf, fun a _ => hfc a⟩⟩
rw [← univ_pi_piecewise]
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩
by_cases a ∈ i <;> simp [*]
#align pi_generate_from_eq_finite pi_generateFrom_eq_finite
theorem induced_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : X → ∀ i, π i) :
induced f Pi.topologicalSpace = ⨅ i, induced (f · i) inferInstance := by
simp_rw [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, Function.comp]
/-- Suppose `π i` is a family of topological spaces indexed by `i : ι`, and `X` is a type
endowed with a family of maps `f i : X → π i` for every `i : ι`, hence inducing a
map `g : X → Π i, π i`. This lemma shows that infimum of the topologies on `X` induced by
the `f i` as `i : ι` varies is simply the topology on `X` induced by `g : X → Π i, π i`
where `Π i, π i` is endowed with the usual product topology. -/
theorem inducing_iInf_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : ∀ i, X → π i) :
@Inducing X (∀ i, π i) (⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance) _ fun x i => f i x :=
letI := ⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance; ⟨(induced_to_pi _).symm⟩
#align inducing_infi_to_pi inducing_iInf_to_pi
variable [Finite ι] [∀ i, DiscreteTopology (π i)]
/-- A finite product of discrete spaces is discrete. -/
instance Pi.discreteTopology : DiscreteTopology (∀ i, π i) :=
singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp fun x => by
rw [← univ_pi_singleton]
exact isOpen_set_pi finite_univ fun i _ => (isOpen_discrete {x i})
#align Pi.discrete_topology Pi.discreteTopology
end Pi
section Sigma
variable {ι κ : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} {τ : κ → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (σ i)]
[∀ k, TopologicalSpace (τ k)] [TopologicalSpace X]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sigmaMk {i : ι} : Continuous (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
continuous_iSup_rng continuous_coinduced_rng
#align continuous_sigma_mk continuous_sigmaMk
-- Porting note: the proof was `by simp only [isOpen_iSup_iff, isOpen_coinduced]`
theorem isOpen_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceSigma
rw [isOpen_iSup_iff]
rfl
#align is_open_sigma_iff isOpen_sigma_iff
theorem isClosed_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsClosed (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sigma_iff, preimage_compl]
#align is_closed_sigma_iff isClosed_sigma_iff
theorem isOpenMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isOpen_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isOpen_empty
#align is_open_map_sigma_mk isOpenMap_sigmaMk
theorem isOpen_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpen (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isOpenMap_sigmaMk.isOpen_range
#align is_open_range_sigma_mk isOpen_range_sigmaMk
theorem isClosedMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosedMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isClosed_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isClosed_empty
#align is_closed_map_sigma_mk isClosedMap_sigmaMk
theorem isClosed_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosed (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isClosedMap_sigmaMk.isClosed_range
#align is_closed_range_sigma_mk isClosed_range_sigmaMk
theorem openEmbedding_sigmaMk {i : ι} : OpenEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective
isOpenMap_sigmaMk
#align open_embedding_sigma_mk openEmbedding_sigmaMk
theorem closedEmbedding_sigmaMk {i : ι} : ClosedEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
closedEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_closed continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective
isClosedMap_sigmaMk
#align closed_embedding_sigma_mk closedEmbedding_sigmaMk
theorem embedding_sigmaMk {i : ι} : Embedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
closedEmbedding_sigmaMk.1
#align embedding_sigma_mk embedding_sigmaMk
theorem Sigma.nhds_mk (i : ι) (x : σ i) : 𝓝 (⟨i, x⟩ : Sigma σ) = Filter.map (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 x) :=
(openEmbedding_sigmaMk.map_nhds_eq x).symm
#align sigma.nhds_mk Sigma.nhds_mk
theorem Sigma.nhds_eq (x : Sigma σ) : 𝓝 x = Filter.map (Sigma.mk x.1) (𝓝 x.2) := by
cases x
apply Sigma.nhds_mk
#align sigma.nhds_eq Sigma.nhds_eq
theorem comap_sigmaMk_nhds (i : ι) (x : σ i) : comap (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 ⟨i, x⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
(embedding_sigmaMk.nhds_eq_comap _).symm
#align comap_sigma_mk_nhds comap_sigmaMk_nhds
theorem isOpen_sigma_fst_preimage (s : Set ι) : IsOpen (Sigma.fst ⁻¹' s : Set (Σ a, σ a)) := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, preimage_iUnion₂]
simp only [← range_sigmaMk]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_range_sigmaMk
#align is_open_sigma_fst_preimage isOpen_sigma_fst_preimage
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous iff its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuous_sigma_iff {f : Sigma σ → X} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceSigma
rw [continuous_iSup_dom]
exact forall_congr' fun _ => continuous_coinduced_dom
#align continuous_sigma_iff continuous_sigma_iff
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous if its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_sigma_iff.2 hf
#align continuous_sigma continuous_sigma
/-- A map defined on a sigma type (a.k.a. the disjoint union of an indexed family of topological
spaces) is inducing iff its restriction to each component is inducing and each the image of each
component under `f` can be separated from the images of all other components by an open set. -/
theorem inducing_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} :
Inducing f ↔ (∀ i, Inducing (f ∘ Sigma.mk i)) ∧
(∀ i, ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ U ↔ x.1 = i) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ h.comp embedding_sigmaMk.1, fun i ↦ ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rcases h.isOpen_iff.1 (isOpen_range_sigmaMk (i := i)) with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
refine ⟨U, hUo, ?_⟩
simpa [ext_iff] using hU
· refine fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ inducing_iff_nhds.2 fun ⟨i, x⟩ ↦ ?_
rw [Sigma.nhds_mk, (h₁ i).nhds_eq_comap, comp_apply, ← comap_comap, map_comap_of_mem]
rcases h₂ i with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap <| hUo.mem_nhds <| (hU _).2 rfl] with y hy
simpa [hU] using hy
@[simp 1100]
theorem continuous_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i) :=
continuous_sigma_iff.trans <| by simp only [Sigma.map, embedding_sigmaMk.continuous_iff, comp]
#align continuous_sigma_map continuous_sigma_map
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i)) :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) :=
continuous_sigma_map.2 hf
#align continuous.sigma_map Continuous.sigma_map
theorem isOpenMap_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
simp only [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_eq, map_map, comp]
#align is_open_map_sigma isOpenMap_sigma
theorem isOpenMap_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
IsOpenMap (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f₂ i) :=
isOpenMap_sigma.trans <|
forall_congr' fun i => (@openEmbedding_sigmaMk _ _ _ (f₁ i)).isOpenMap_iff.symm
#align is_open_map_sigma_map isOpenMap_sigma_map
theorem inducing_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (h₁ : Injective f₁) :
Inducing (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, Inducing (f₂ i) := by
simp only [inducing_iff_nhds, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_mk, Sigma.map_mk, ← map_sigma_mk_comap h₁,
map_inj sigma_mk_injective]
#align inducing_sigma_map inducing_sigma_map
theorem embedding_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (h : Injective f₁) :
Embedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, Embedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [embedding_iff, Injective.sigma_map, inducing_sigma_map h, forall_and, h.sigma_map_iff]
#align embedding_sigma_map embedding_sigma_map
theorem openEmbedding_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (h : Injective f₁) :
OpenEmbedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, OpenEmbedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [openEmbedding_iff_embedding_open, isOpenMap_sigma_map, embedding_sigma_map h,
forall_and]
#align open_embedding_sigma_map openEmbedding_sigma_map
end Sigma
section ULift
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 1,727 | 1,729 | theorem ULift.isOpen_iff [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set (ULift.{v} X)} :
IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) := by |
rw [ULift.topologicalSpace, ← Equiv.ulift_apply, ← Equiv.ulift.coinduced_symm, ← isOpen_coinduced]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue
#align_import measure_theory.covering.differentiation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
/-!
# Differentiation of measures
On a second countable metric space with a measure `μ`, consider a Vitali family (i.e., for each `x`
one has a family of sets shrinking to `x`, with a good behavior with respect to covering theorems).
Consider also another measure `ρ`. Then, for almost every `x`, the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges when
`a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family, towards the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with
respect to `μ`. This is the main theorem on differentiation of measures.
This theorem is proved in this file, under the name `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`. Note that,
almost surely, `μ a` is eventually positive and finite (see
`VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos` and `VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top`), so the
ratio really makes sense.
For concrete applications, one needs concrete instances of Vitali families, as provided for instance
by `Besicovitch.vitaliFamily` (for balls) or by `Vitali.vitaliFamily` (for doubling measures).
Specific applications to Lebesgue density points and the Lebesgue differentiation theorem are also
derived:
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that, for almost every point `x ∈ s`,
then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` tends to `1` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_average_norm_sub` states that, for almost every point `x`, then the
average of `y ↦ ‖f y - f x‖` on `a` tends to `0` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
## Sketch of proof
Let `v` be a Vitali family for `μ`. Assume for simplicity that `ρ` is absolutely continuous with
respect to `μ`, as the case of a singular measure is easier.
It is easy to see that a set `s` on which `liminf ρ a / μ a < q` satisfies `ρ s ≤ q * μ s`, by using
a disjoint subcovering provided by the definition of Vitali families. Similarly for the limsup.
It follows that a set on which `ρ a / μ a` oscillates has measure `0`, and therefore that
`ρ a / μ a` converges almost surely (`VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_div`). Moreover, on a set where the
limit is close to a constant `c`, one gets `ρ s ∼ c μ s`, using again a covering lemma as above.
It follows that `ρ` is equal to `μ.withDensity (v.limRatio ρ x)`, where `v.limRatio ρ x` is the
limit of `ρ a / μ a` at `x` (which is well defined almost everywhere). By uniqueness of the
Radon-Nikodym derivative, one gets `v.limRatio ρ x = ρ.rnDeriv μ x` almost everywhere, completing
the proof.
There is a difficulty in this sketch: this argument works well when `v.limRatio ρ` is measurable,
but there is no guarantee that this is the case, especially if one doesn't make further assumptions
on the Vitali family. We use an indirect argument to show that `v.limRatio ρ` is always
almost everywhere measurable, again based on the disjoint subcovering argument
(see `VitaliFamily.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio`), and then proceed as sketched above
but replacing `v.limRatio ρ` by a measurable version called `v.limRatioMeas ρ`.
## Counterexample
The standing assumption in this file is that spaces are second countable. Without this assumption,
measures may be zero locally but nonzero globally, which is not compatible with differentiation
theory (which deduces global information from local one). Here is an example displaying this
behavior.
Define a measure `μ` by `μ s = 0` if `s` is covered by countably many balls of radius `1`,
and `μ s = ∞` otherwise. This is indeed a countably additive measure, which is moreover
locally finite and doubling at small scales. It vanishes on every ball of radius `1`, so all the
quantities in differentiation theory (defined as ratios of measures as the radius tends to zero)
make no sense. However, the measure is not globally zero if the space is big enough.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.9][Federer1996]
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
/-- The limit along a Vitali family of `ρ a / μ a` where it makes sense, and garbage otherwise.
Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary device to show that this ratio tends almost
everywhere to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
#align vitali_family.lim_ratio VitaliFamily.limRatio
/-- For almost every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have positive
measure. (This is a nontrivial result, following from the covering property of Vitali families). -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp (config := { zeta := false }) only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
#align vitali_family.ae_eventually_measure_pos VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos
/-- For every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have finite measure.
(This is a trivial result, following from the fact that the measure is locally finite). -/
theorem eventually_measure_lt_top [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, μ a < ∞ :=
(μ.finiteAt_nhds x).eventually.filter_mono inf_le_left
#align vitali_family.eventually_measure_lt_top VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top
/-- If two measures `ρ` and `ν` have, at every point of a set `s`, arbitrarily small sets in a
Vitali family satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`, then `ρ s ≤ ν s` if `ρ ≪ μ`. -/
theorem measure_le_of_frequently_le [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] {ρ : Measure α}
(ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ν] (hρ : ρ ≪ μ) (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ ν a) : ρ s ≤ ν s := by
-- this follows from a covering argument using the sets satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`.
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos _ => ?_
obtain ⟨U, sU, U_open, νU⟩ : ∃ (U : Set α), s ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ ν U ≤ ν s + ε :=
exists_isOpen_le_add s ν (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne'
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | ρ a ≤ ν a ∧ a ⊆ U}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
apply v.fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently f s fun x hx => ?_
have :=
(hs x hx).and_eventually
((v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x).and
(v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (U_open.mem_nhds (sU hx))))
apply Frequently.mono this
rintro a ⟨ρa, _, aU⟩
exact ⟨ρa, aU⟩
haveI : Encodable h.index := h.index_countable.toEncodable
calc
ρ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ρ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous hρ
_ ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ν (h.covering x) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => (h.covering_mem x.2).1
_ = ν (⋃ x : h.index, h.covering x) := by
rw [measure_iUnion h.covering_disjoint_subtype fun i => h.measurableSet_u i.2]
_ ≤ ν U := (measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun i => (h.covering_mem i.2).2))
_ ≤ ν s + ε := νU
#align vitali_family.measure_le_of_frequently_le VitaliFamily.measure_le_of_frequently_le
section
variable [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {ρ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ρ]
/-- If a measure `ρ` is singular with respect to `μ`, then for `μ` almost every `x`, the ratio
`ρ a / μ a` tends to zero when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family. This makes sense
as `μ a` is eventually positive by `ae_eventually_measure_pos`. -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular (hρ : ρ ⟂ₘ μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
have A : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a := by
intro ε εpos
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a} with hs
change μ s = 0
obtain ⟨o, _, ρo, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, MeasurableSet o ∧ ρ o = 0 ∧ μ oᶜ = 0 := hρ
apply le_antisymm _ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ o ∪ oᶜ) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inter_union_compl s o]
gcongr
apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ o) + μ oᶜ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (s ∩ o) := by rw [μo, add_zero]
_ = (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * (ε • μ) (s ∩ o) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne' ENNReal.coe_ne_top, one_mul]
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ (s ∩ o) := by
gcongr
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ ((Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.refl μ).smul ε) _ ?_
intro x hx
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [mem_inter_iff, not_lt, not_eventually, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
exact hx.1
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ o := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = 0 := by rw [ρo, mul_zero]
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ≥0, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ≥0)
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < u n * μ a :=
ae_all_iff.2 fun n => A (u n) (u_pos n)
filter_upwards [B, v.ae_eventually_measure_pos]
intro x hx h'x
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun z hz => (ENNReal.not_lt_zero hz).elim, fun z hz => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨w, w_pos, w_lt⟩ : ∃ w : ℝ≥0, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < w ∧ (w : ℝ≥0∞) < z :=
ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hz
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < w := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 w (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 w_pos)).exists
filter_upwards [hx n, h'x, v.eventually_measure_lt_top x]
intro a ha μa_pos μa_lt_top
rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl μa_pos.ne') (Or.inl μa_lt_top.ne)]
exact ha.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' ((ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 hn.le).trans w_lt.le) _)
#align vitali_family.ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular
section AbsolutelyContinuous
variable (hρ : ρ ≪ μ)
/-- A set of points `s` satisfying both `ρ a ≤ c * μ a` and `ρ a ≥ d * μ a` at arbitrarily small
sets in a Vitali family has measure `0` if `c < d`. Indeed, the first inequality should imply
that `ρ s ≤ c * μ s`, and the second one that `ρ s ≥ d * μ s`, a contradiction if `0 < μ s`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 211 | 228 | theorem null_of_frequently_le_of_frequently_ge {c d : ℝ≥0} (hcd : c < d) (s : Set α)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ c * μ a)
(hd : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, (d : ℝ≥0∞) * μ a ≤ ρ a) : μ s = 0 := by |
apply measure_null_of_locally_null s fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ μ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top μ x
refine ⟨s ∩ o, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), ?_⟩
let s' := s ∩ o
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl (ρ s')
calc
ρ s' ≤ c * μ s' := v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (c • μ) hρ s' fun x hx => hc x hx.1
_ < d * μ s' := by
apply (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_right h _).2 (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hcd)
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_right) μo).ne
_ ≤ ρ s' :=
v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ ((Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.refl μ).smul d) s' fun x hx =>
hd x hx.1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Finset β}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
#align has_sum_zero hasSum_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
#align has_sum_empty hasSum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
#align summable_zero summable_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
#align summable_empty summable_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
#align summable_congr summable_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
#align summable.congr Summable.congr
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
#align has_sum.has_sum_of_sum_eq HasSum.hasSum_of_sum_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
#align has_sum_iff_has_sum hasSum_iff_hasSum
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
#align function.injective.summable_iff Function.Injective.summable_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
#align has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator hasSum_subtype_iff_indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
#align summable_subtype_iff_indicator summable_subtype_iff_indicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
#align has_sum_subtype_support hasSum_subtype_support
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
#align finset.summable Finset.summable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
#align set.finite.summable Set.Finite.summable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
#align has_sum_single hasSum_single
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
#align has_sum_ite_eq hasSum_ite_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
#align equiv.has_sum_iff Equiv.hasSum_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
#align function.injective.has_sum_range_iff Function.Injective.hasSum_range_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
#align equiv.summable_iff Equiv.summable_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
#align equiv.has_sum_iff_of_support Equiv.hasSum_iff_of_support
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
#align has_sum_iff_has_sum_of_ne_zero_bij hasSum_iff_hasSum_of_ne_zero_bij
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport he
#align equiv.summable_iff_of_support Equiv.summable_iff_of_support
@[to_additive]
protected theorem HasProd.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : HasProd f a) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) := by
have : (g ∘ fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) = fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, (g ∘ f) b :=
funext <| map_prod g _
unfold HasProd
rw [← this]
exact (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
#align has_sum.map HasSum.map
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inducing.hasProd_iff [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : Inducing g) (f : β → α) (a : α) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp_rw [HasProd, comp_apply, ← map_prod]
exact hg.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Multipliable f) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.hasProd.map g hg).multipliable
#align summable.map Summable.map
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G G'}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] [FunLike G' γ α] [MonoidHomClass G' γ α]
(g : G) (g' : G') (hg : Continuous g) (hg' : Continuous g') (hinv : Function.LeftInverse g' g) :
Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by
have := h.map _ hg'
rwa [← Function.comp.assoc, hinv.id] at this, fun h ↦ h.map _ hg⟩
#align summable.map_iff_of_left_inverse Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.map_tprod [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [T2Space γ] (hf : Multipliable f)
{G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
g (∏' i, f i) = ∏' i, g (f i) := (HasProd.tprod_eq (HasProd.map hf.hasProd g hg)).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Inducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[T2Space γ] {G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : Inducing g) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable (g ∘ f) ∧ ∏' i, g (f i) ∈ Set.range g := by
constructor
· intro hf
constructor
· exact hf.map g hg.continuous
· use ∏' i, f i
exact hf.map_tprod g hg.continuous
· rintro ⟨hgf, a, ha⟩
use a
have := hgf.hasProd
simp_rw [comp_apply, ← ha] at this
exact (hg.hasProd_iff f a).mp this
/-- "A special case of `Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience" -/
@[to_additive "A special case of `Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience"]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_equiv [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[EquivLike G α γ] [MulEquivClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g)
(hg' : Continuous (EquivLike.inv g : γ → α)) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse g (g : α ≃* γ).symm hg hg' (EquivLike.left_inv g)
#align summable.map_iff_of_equiv Summable.map_iff_of_equiv
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Surjective.multipliable_iff_of_hasProd_iff {α' : Type*} [CommMonoid α']
[TopologicalSpace α'] {e : α' → α} (hes : Function.Surjective e) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, HasProd f (e a) ↔ HasProd g a) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
hes.exists.trans <| exists_congr <| @he
#align function.surjective.summable_iff_of_has_sum_iff Function.Surjective.summable_iff_of_hasSum_iff
variable [ContinuousMul α]
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul (hf : HasProd f a) (hg : HasProd g b) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b * g b) (a * b) := by
dsimp only [HasProd] at hf hg ⊢
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib]
exact hf.mul hg
#align has_sum.add HasSum.add
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b * g b :=
(hf.hasProd.mul hg.hasProd).multipliable
#align summable.add Summable.add
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : Finset γ} :
(∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f i) (a i)) → HasProd (fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [hasProd_one, prod_empty, forall_true_iff]) <| by
-- Porting note: with some help, `simp` used to be able to close the goal
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, not_false_iff,
prod_insert, and_imp]
exact fun x s _ IH hx h ↦ hx.mul (IH h)
#align has_sum_sum hasSum_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_prod {f : γ → β → α} {s : Finset γ} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Multipliable (f i)) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b :=
(hasProd_prod fun i hi ↦ (hf i hi).hasProd).multipliable
#align summable_sum summable_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_disjoint {s t : Set β} (hs : Disjoint s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (s ∪ t : Set β) → α) (a * b) := by
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Set.mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint hs]
exact ha.mul hb
#align has_sum.add_disjoint HasSum.add_disjoint
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod_disjoint {ι} (s : Finset ι) {t : ι → Set β} {a : ι → α}
(hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t i → α) (a i)) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) → α) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
simp_rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion _ _ hs]
exact hasProd_prod hf
#align has_sum_sum_disjoint hasSum_sum_disjoint
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_isCompl {s t : Set β} (hs : IsCompl s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) := by
simpa [← hs.compl_eq] using
(hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 ha).mul (hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 hb)
#align has_sum.add_is_compl HasSum.add_isCompl
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_compl {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl hb
#align has_sum.add_compl HasSum.add_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul_compl {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.mul_compl hsc.hasProd).multipliable
#align summable.add_compl Summable.add_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.compl_mul {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl.symm hb
#align has_sum.compl_add HasSum.compl_add
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.compl_add {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.compl_mul hsc.hasProd).multipliable
#align summable.compl_add Summable.compl_add
/-- Version of `HasProd.update` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`,
it gives a relationship between the products of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `HasSum.update` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist."]
theorem HasProd.update' {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a a' : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (x : α)
(hf' : HasProd (update f b x) a') : a * x = a' * f b := by
have : ∀ b', f b' * ite (b' = b) x 1 = update f b x b' * ite (b' = b) (f b) 1 := by
intro b'
split_ifs with hb'
· simpa only [Function.update_apply, hb', eq_self_iff_true] using mul_comm (f b) x
· simp only [Function.update_apply, hb', if_false]
have h := hf.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b x)
simp_rw [this] at h
exact HasProd.unique h (hf'.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b (f b)))
#align has_sum.update' HasSum.update'
/-- Version of `hasProd_ite_div_hasProd` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`, it gives
a relationship between the products of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist."]
theorem eq_mul_of_hasProd_ite {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (a' : α)
(hf' : HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) a') : a = a' * f b := by
refine (mul_one a).symm.trans (hf.update' b 1 ?_)
convert hf'
apply update_apply
#align eq_add_of_has_sum_ite eq_add_of_hasSum_ite
end HasProd
section tprod
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_set_coe (f : β → α) {s t : Set β} (h : s = t) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x : t, f x := by rw [h]
#align tsum_congr_subtype tsum_congr_set_coe
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_subtype (f : β → α) {P Q : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) :
∏' x : {x // P x}, f x = ∏' x : {x // Q x}, f x :=
tprod_congr_set_coe f <| Set.ext h
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_finprod (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ᶠ b, f b := by simp [tprod_def, multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport hf, hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod' {s : Finset β} (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_finprod (s.finite_toSet.subset hf), finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod {s : Finset β} (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b :=
tprod_eq_prod' <| mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 hf
#align tsum_eq_sum tsum_eq_sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_one : ∏' _ : β, (1 : α) = 1 := by rw [tprod_eq_finprod] <;> simp
#align tsum_zero tsum_zero
#align tsum_zero' tsum_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_empty [IsEmpty β] : ∏' b, f b = 1 := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := (∅ : Finset β))] <;> simp
#align tsum_empty tsum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr {f g : β → α}
(hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : ∏' b, f b = ∏' b, g b :=
congr_arg tprod (funext hfg)
#align tsum_congr tsum_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_fintype [Fintype β] (f : β → α) : ∏' b, f b = ∏ b, f b := by
apply tprod_eq_prod; simp
#align tsum_fintype tsum_fintype
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_tprod_mulIndicator (f : β → α) (s : Finset β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏' x, Set.mulIndicator (↑s) f x := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod' (Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset),
Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset _ Finset.Subset.rfl]
#align sum_eq_tsum_indicator sum_eq_tsum_indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_bool (f : Bool → α) : ∏' i : Bool, f i = f false * f true := by
rw [tprod_fintype, Fintype.prod_bool, mul_comm]
#align tsum_bool tsum_bool
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_mulSingle {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' = 1) :
∏' b, f b = f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := {b}), prod_singleton]
exact fun b' hb' ↦ hf b' (by simpa using hb')
#align tsum_eq_single tsum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_tprod_eq_mulSingle (f : β → γ → α) (b : β) (c : γ) (hfb : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' c = 1)
(hfc : ∀ b', ∀ c' ≠ c, f b' c' = 1) : ∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = f b c :=
calc
∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = ∏' b', f b' c := tprod_congr fun b' ↦ tprod_eq_mulSingle _ (hfc b')
_ = f b c := tprod_eq_mulSingle _ hfb
#align tsum_tsum_eq_single tsum_tsum_eq_single
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
∏' b', (if b' = b then a else 1) = a := by
rw [tprod_eq_mulSingle b]
· simp
· intro b' hb'; simp [hb']
#align tsum_ite_eq tsum_ite_eq
-- Porting note: Added nolint simpNF, simpNF falsely claims that lhs does not simplify under simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : { x // x ∈ s }, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← prod_attach]; exact tprod_fintype _
#align finset.tsum_subtype Finset.tsum_subtype
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype' (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : (s : Set β), f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp
#align finset.tsum_subtype' Finset.tsum_subtype'
-- Porting note: Added nolint simpNF, simpNF falsely claims that lhs does not simplify under simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem tprod_singleton (b : β) (f : β → α) : ∏' x : ({b} : Set β), f x = f b := by
rw [← coe_singleton, Finset.tprod_subtype', prod_singleton]
#align tsum_singleton tsum_singleton
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.tprod_eq {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) {f : β → α}
(hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range g) : ∏' c, f (g c) = ∏' b, f b := by
have : mulSupport f = g '' mulSupport (f ∘ g) := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff.2 hf]
rw [← Function.comp_def]
by_cases hf_fin : (mulSupport f).Finite
· have hfg_fin : (mulSupport (f ∘ g)).Finite := hf_fin.preimage hg.injOn
lift g to γ ↪ β using hg
simp_rw [tprod_eq_prod' hf_fin.coe_toFinset.ge, tprod_eq_prod' hfg_fin.coe_toFinset.ge,
comp_apply, ← Finset.prod_map]
refine Finset.prod_congr (Finset.coe_injective ?_) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
simp [this]
· have hf_fin' : ¬ Set.Finite (mulSupport (f ∘ g)) := by
rwa [this, Set.finite_image_iff hg.injOn] at hf_fin
simp_rw [tprod_def, if_neg hf_fin, if_neg hf_fin', Multipliable,
hg.hasProd_iff (mulSupport_subset_iff'.1 hf)]
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.tprod_eq (e : γ ≃ β) (f : β → α) : ∏' c, f (e c) = ∏' b, f b :=
e.injective.tprod_eq <| by simp
#align equiv.tsum_eq Equiv.tsum_eq
/-! ### `tprod` on subsets - part 1 -/
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset {f : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
Subtype.val_injective.tprod_eq <| by simpa
#align tsum_subtype_eq_of_support_subset tsum_subtype_eq_of_support_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype_mulSupport (f : β → α) : ∏' x : mulSupport f, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset Set.Subset.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype (s : Set β) (f : β → α) : ∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x, s.mulIndicator f x := by
rw [← tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset, tprod_congr]
simp
#align tsum_subtype tsum_subtype
-- Porting note: Added nolint simpNF, simpNF falsely claims that lhs does not simplify under simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem tprod_univ (f : β → α) : ∏' x : (Set.univ : Set β), f x = ∏' x, f x :=
tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.subset_univ _
#align tsum_univ tsum_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_image {g : γ → β} (f : β → α) {s : Set γ} (hg : Set.InjOn g s) :
∏' x : g '' s, f x = ∏' x : s, f (g x) :=
((Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn _ _ hg).tprod_eq fun x ↦ f x).symm
#align tsum_image tsum_image
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_range {g : γ → β} (f : β → α) (hg : Injective g) :
∏' x : Set.range g, f x = ∏' x, f (g x) := by
rw [← Set.image_univ, tprod_image f hg.injOn]
simp_rw [← comp_apply (g := g), tprod_univ (f ∘ g)]
#align tsum_range tsum_range
/-- If `f b = 1` for all `b ∈ t`, then the product of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the
product of `f a` with `a ∈ s ∖ t`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f b = 0` for all `b ∈ t`, then the sum of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the
sum of `f a` with `a ∈ s ∖ t`."]
lemma tprod_setElem_eq_tprod_setElem_diff {f : β → α} (s t : Set β)
(hf₀ : ∀ b ∈ t, f b = 1) :
∏' a : s, f a = ∏' a : (s \ t : Set β), f a :=
.symm <| (Set.inclusion_injective (t := s) Set.diff_subset).tprod_eq (f := f ∘ (↑)) <|
mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 fun b hb ↦ hf₀ b <| by simpa using hb
/-- If `f b = 1`, then the product of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the product of `f a` for
`a ∈ s ∖ {b}`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f b = 0`, then the sum of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the sum of `f a`
for `a ∈ s ∖ {b}`."]
lemma tprod_eq_tprod_diff_singleton {f : β → α} (s : Set β) {b : β} (hf₀ : f b = 1) :
∏' a : s, f a = ∏' a : (s \ {b} : Set β), f a :=
tprod_setElem_eq_tprod_setElem_diff s {b} fun _ ha ↦ ha ▸ hf₀
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 565 | 568 | theorem tprod_eq_tprod_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β) (hi : Injective i)
(hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i) (hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : ∏' x, f x = ∏' y, g y := by |
rw [← tprod_subtype_mulSupport g, ← hi.tprod_eq hf]
simp only [hfg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### mem -/
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
/-! ### List subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
/-! ### tail -/
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
/-! ### next? -/
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
/-! ### get? -/
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
/-! ### drop -/
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
/-! ### modifyNth -/
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
/-! ### set -/
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
/-! ### removeNth -/
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
/-! ### tail -/
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
/-! ### eraseP -/
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [BEq α]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 539 | 544 | theorem erase_eq_eraseP' (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a = l.eraseP (· == a) := by |
induction l
· simp
· next b t ih =>
rw [erase_cons, eraseP_cons, ih]
if h : b == a then simp [h] else simp [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian
#align_import ring_theory.localization.submodule from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1ebb20602a8caef435ce47f6373e1aa40851a177"
/-!
# Submodules in localizations of commutative rings
## Implementation notes
See `RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
namespace IsLocalization
-- This was previously a `hasCoe` instance, but if `S = R` then this will loop.
-- It could be a `hasCoeT` instance, but we keep it explicit here to avoid slowing down
-- the rest of the library.
/-- Map from ideals of `R` to submodules of `S` induced by `f`. -/
def coeSubmodule (I : Ideal R) : Submodule R S :=
Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R S) I
#align is_localization.coe_submodule IsLocalization.coeSubmodule
theorem mem_coeSubmodule (I : Ideal R) {x : S} :
x ∈ coeSubmodule S I ↔ ∃ y : R, y ∈ I ∧ algebraMap R S y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_localization.mem_coe_submodule IsLocalization.mem_coeSubmodule
theorem coeSubmodule_mono {I J : Ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) : coeSubmodule S I ≤ coeSubmodule S J :=
Submodule.map_mono h
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_mono IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_mono
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_bot : coeSubmodule S (⊥ : Ideal R) = ⊥ := by
rw [coeSubmodule, Submodule.map_bot]
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_bot IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_bot
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_top : coeSubmodule S (⊤ : Ideal R) = 1 := by
rw [coeSubmodule, Submodule.map_top, Submodule.one_eq_range]
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_top IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_sup (I J : Ideal R) :
coeSubmodule S (I ⊔ J) = coeSubmodule S I ⊔ coeSubmodule S J :=
Submodule.map_sup _ _ _
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_sup IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_sup
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_mul (I J : Ideal R) :
coeSubmodule S (I * J) = coeSubmodule S I * coeSubmodule S J :=
Submodule.map_mul _ _ (Algebra.ofId R S)
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_mul IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_mul
theorem coeSubmodule_fg (hS : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S)) (I : Ideal R) :
Submodule.FG (coeSubmodule S I) ↔ Submodule.FG I :=
⟨Submodule.fg_of_fg_map _ (LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mpr hS), Submodule.FG.map _⟩
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_fg IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_fg
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_span (s : Set R) :
coeSubmodule S (Ideal.span s) = Submodule.span R (algebraMap R S '' s) := by
rw [IsLocalization.coeSubmodule, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span]
rfl
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_span IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_span
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem coeSubmodule_span_singleton (x : R) :
coeSubmodule S (Ideal.span {x}) = Submodule.span R {(algebraMap R S) x} := by
rw [coeSubmodule_span, Set.image_singleton]
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_span_singleton IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_span_singleton
variable {g : R →+* P}
variable {T : Submonoid P} (hy : M ≤ T.comap g) {Q : Type*} [CommRing Q]
variable [Algebra P Q] [IsLocalization T Q]
variable [IsLocalization M S]
section
theorem isNoetherianRing (h : IsNoetherianRing R) : IsNoetherianRing S := by
rw [isNoetherianRing_iff, isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded] at h ⊢
exact OrderEmbedding.wellFounded (IsLocalization.orderEmbedding M S).dual h
#align is_localization.is_noetherian_ring IsLocalization.isNoetherianRing
end
variable {S M}
@[mono]
theorem coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule (h : M ≤ nonZeroDivisors R) {I J : Ideal R} :
coeSubmodule S I ≤ coeSubmodule S J ↔ I ≤ J :=
-- Note: #8386 had to specify the value of `f` here:
Submodule.map_le_map_iff_of_injective (f := Algebra.linearMap R S) (IsLocalization.injective _ h)
_ _
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule
@[mono]
theorem coeSubmodule_strictMono (h : M ≤ nonZeroDivisors R) :
StrictMono (coeSubmodule S : Ideal R → Submodule R S) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule h).symm
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_strict_mono IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_strictMono
variable (S)
theorem coeSubmodule_injective (h : M ≤ nonZeroDivisors R) :
Function.Injective (coeSubmodule S : Ideal R → Submodule R S) :=
injective_of_le_imp_le _ fun hl => (coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule h).mp hl
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_injective IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_injective
theorem coeSubmodule_isPrincipal {I : Ideal R} (h : M ≤ nonZeroDivisors R) :
(coeSubmodule S I).IsPrincipal ↔ I.IsPrincipal := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩⟩
· have x_mem : x ∈ coeSubmodule S I := hx.symm ▸ Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x
obtain ⟨x, _, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeSubmodule _ _).mp x_mem
refine ⟨⟨x, coeSubmodule_injective S h ?_⟩⟩
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, hx, coeSubmodule_span_singleton]
· refine ⟨⟨algebraMap R S x, ?_⟩⟩
rw [hx, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, coeSubmodule_span_singleton]
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_is_principal IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_isPrincipal
variable {S} (M)
theorem mem_span_iff {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [Module S N] [IsScalarTower R S N]
{x : N} {a : Set N} :
x ∈ Submodule.span S a ↔ ∃ y ∈ Submodule.span R a, ∃ z : M, x = mk' S 1 z • y := by
constructor
· intro h
refine Submodule.span_induction h ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro x hx
exact ⟨x, Submodule.subset_span hx, 1, by rw [mk'_one, _root_.map_one, one_smul]⟩
· exact ⟨0, Submodule.zero_mem _, 1, by rw [mk'_one, _root_.map_one, one_smul]⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨y, hy, z, rfl⟩ ⟨y', hy', z', rfl⟩
refine
⟨(z' : R) • y + (z : R) • y',
Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy'), z * z', ?_⟩
rw [smul_add, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S (z : R), ←
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S (z' : R), smul_smul, smul_smul]
congr 1
· rw [← mul_one (1 : R), mk'_mul, mul_assoc, mk'_spec, _root_.map_one, mul_one, mul_one]
· rw [← mul_one (1 : R), mk'_mul, mul_right_comm, mk'_spec, _root_.map_one, mul_one, one_mul]
· rintro a _ ⟨y, hy, z, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y', z', rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M a
refine ⟨y' • y, Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy, z' * z, ?_⟩
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S y', smul_smul, ← mk'_mul, smul_smul,
mul_comm (mk' S _ _), mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
· rintro ⟨y, hy, z, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.span_subset_span R S _ hy)
#align is_localization.mem_span_iff IsLocalization.mem_span_iff
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Submodule.lean | 165 | 175 | theorem mem_span_map {x : S} {a : Set R} :
x ∈ Ideal.span (algebraMap R S '' a) ↔ ∃ y ∈ Ideal.span a, ∃ z : M, x = mk' S y z := by |
refine (mem_span_iff M).trans ?_
constructor
· rw [← coeSubmodule_span]
rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, z, hz⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, z, ?_⟩
rw [hz, Algebra.linearMap_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mul_one]
· rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz⟩
refine ⟨algebraMap R S y, Submodule.map_mem_span_algebraMap_image _ _ hy, z, ?_⟩
rw [hz, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mul_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Order.Minimal
/-!
# Irreducibility in topological spaces
## Main definitions
* `IrreducibleSpace`: a typeclass applying to topological spaces, stating that the space is not the
union of a nontrivial pair of disjoint opens.
* `IsIrreducible`: for a nonempty set in a topological space, the property that the set is an
irreducible space in the subspace topology.
## On the definition of irreducible and connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, irreducible spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreirreducible`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as irreducible.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Classical
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Preirreducible
/-- A preirreducible set `s` is one where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def IsPreirreducible (s : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set X, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty → (s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
#align is_preirreducible IsPreirreducible
/-- An irreducible set `s` is one that is nonempty and
where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def IsIrreducible (s : Set X) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreirreducible s
#align is_irreducible IsIrreducible
theorem IsIrreducible.nonempty (h : IsIrreducible s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
#align is_irreducible.nonempty IsIrreducible.nonempty
theorem IsIrreducible.isPreirreducible (h : IsIrreducible s) : IsPreirreducible s :=
h.2
#align is_irreducible.is_preirreducible IsIrreducible.isPreirreducible
theorem isPreirreducible_empty : IsPreirreducible (∅ : Set X) := fun _ _ _ _ _ ⟨_, h1, _⟩ =>
h1.elim
#align is_preirreducible_empty isPreirreducible_empty
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreirreducible (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreirreducible s :=
fun _u _v _ _ ⟨_x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩ => ⟨y, hys, hs hxs hys ▸ hxu, hyv⟩
#align set.subsingleton.is_preirreducible Set.Subsingleton.isPreirreducible
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isPreirreducible_singleton {x} : IsPreirreducible ({x} : Set X) :=
subsingleton_singleton.isPreirreducible
theorem isIrreducible_singleton {x} : IsIrreducible ({x} : Set X) :=
⟨singleton_nonempty x, isPreirreducible_singleton⟩
#align is_irreducible_singleton isIrreducible_singleton
theorem isPreirreducible_iff_closure : IsPreirreducible (closure s) ↔ IsPreirreducible s :=
forall₄_congr fun u v hu hv => by
iterate 3 rw [closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff]
exacts [hu.inter hv, hv, hu]
#align is_preirreducible_iff_closure isPreirreducible_iff_closure
theorem isIrreducible_iff_closure : IsIrreducible (closure s) ↔ IsIrreducible s :=
and_congr closure_nonempty_iff isPreirreducible_iff_closure
#align is_irreducible_iff_closure isIrreducible_iff_closure
protected alias ⟨_, IsPreirreducible.closure⟩ := isPreirreducible_iff_closure
#align is_preirreducible.closure IsPreirreducible.closure
protected alias ⟨_, IsIrreducible.closure⟩ := isIrreducible_iff_closure
#align is_irreducible.closure IsIrreducible.closure
theorem exists_preirreducible (s : Set X) (H : IsPreirreducible s) :
∃ t : Set X, IsPreirreducible t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ u, IsPreirreducible u → t ⊆ u → u = t :=
let ⟨m, hm, hsm, hmm⟩ :=
zorn_subset_nonempty { t : Set X | IsPreirreducible t }
(fun c hc hcc _ =>
⟨⋃₀ c, fun u v hu hv ⟨y, hy, hyu⟩ ⟨x, hx, hxv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpc, hyp⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hy
let ⟨q, hqc, hxq⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hx
Or.casesOn (hcc.total hpc hqc)
(fun hpq : p ⊆ q =>
let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hqc u v hu hv ⟨y, hpq hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨x, hxq, hxv⟩
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hqc, hxuv⟩)
fun hqp : q ⊆ p =>
let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hpc u v hu hv ⟨y, hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨x, hqp hxq, hxv⟩
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hpc, hxuv⟩,
fun _ hxc => subset_sUnion_of_mem hxc⟩)
s H
⟨m, hm, hsm, fun _u hu hmu => hmm _ hu hmu⟩
#align exists_preirreducible exists_preirreducible
/-- The set of irreducible components of a topological space. -/
def irreducibleComponents (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Set (Set X) :=
maximals (· ≤ ·) { s : Set X | IsIrreducible s }
#align irreducible_components irreducibleComponents
theorem isClosed_of_mem_irreducibleComponents (s) (H : s ∈ irreducibleComponents X) :
IsClosed s := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, eq_comm]
exact subset_closure.antisymm (H.2 H.1.closure subset_closure)
#align is_closed_of_mem_irreducible_components isClosed_of_mem_irreducibleComponents
theorem irreducibleComponents_eq_maximals_closed (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] :
irreducibleComponents X = maximals (· ≤ ·) { s : Set X | IsClosed s ∧ IsIrreducible s } := by
ext s
constructor
· intro H
exact ⟨⟨isClosed_of_mem_irreducibleComponents _ H, H.1⟩, fun x h e => H.2 h.2 e⟩
· intro H
refine ⟨H.1.2, fun x h e => ?_⟩
have : closure x ≤ s := H.2 ⟨isClosed_closure, h.closure⟩ (e.trans subset_closure)
exact le_trans subset_closure this
#align irreducible_components_eq_maximals_closed irreducibleComponents_eq_maximals_closed
/-- A maximal irreducible set that contains a given point. -/
def irreducibleComponent (x : X) : Set X :=
Classical.choose (exists_preirreducible {x} isPreirreducible_singleton)
#align irreducible_component irreducibleComponent
theorem irreducibleComponent_property (x : X) :
IsPreirreducible (irreducibleComponent x) ∧
{x} ⊆ irreducibleComponent x ∧
∀ u, IsPreirreducible u → irreducibleComponent x ⊆ u → u = irreducibleComponent x :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_preirreducible {x} isPreirreducible_singleton)
#align irreducible_component_property irreducibleComponent_property
theorem mem_irreducibleComponent {x : X} : x ∈ irreducibleComponent x :=
singleton_subset_iff.1 (irreducibleComponent_property x).2.1
#align mem_irreducible_component mem_irreducibleComponent
theorem isIrreducible_irreducibleComponent {x : X} : IsIrreducible (irreducibleComponent x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_irreducibleComponent⟩, (irreducibleComponent_property x).1⟩
#align is_irreducible_irreducible_component isIrreducible_irreducibleComponent
theorem eq_irreducibleComponent {x : X} :
IsPreirreducible s → irreducibleComponent x ⊆ s → s = irreducibleComponent x :=
(irreducibleComponent_property x).2.2 _
#align eq_irreducible_component eq_irreducibleComponent
theorem irreducibleComponent_mem_irreducibleComponents (x : X) :
irreducibleComponent x ∈ irreducibleComponents X :=
⟨isIrreducible_irreducibleComponent, fun _ h₁ h₂ => (eq_irreducibleComponent h₁.2 h₂).le⟩
#align irreducible_component_mem_irreducible_components irreducibleComponent_mem_irreducibleComponents
theorem isClosed_irreducibleComponent {x : X} : IsClosed (irreducibleComponent x) :=
isClosed_of_mem_irreducibleComponents _ (irreducibleComponent_mem_irreducibleComponents x)
#align is_closed_irreducible_component isClosed_irreducibleComponent
/-- A preirreducible space is one where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens. -/
class PreirreducibleSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a preirreducible space, `Set.univ` is a preirreducible set. -/
isPreirreducible_univ : IsPreirreducible (univ : Set X)
#align preirreducible_space PreirreducibleSpace
/-- An irreducible space is one that is nonempty
and where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens. -/
class IrreducibleSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] extends PreirreducibleSpace X : Prop where
toNonempty : Nonempty X
#align irreducible_space IrreducibleSpace
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 50] IrreducibleSpace.toNonempty
theorem IrreducibleSpace.isIrreducible_univ (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [IrreducibleSpace X] :
IsIrreducible (univ : Set X) :=
⟨univ_nonempty, PreirreducibleSpace.isPreirreducible_univ⟩
#align irreducible_space.is_irreducible_univ IrreducibleSpace.isIrreducible_univ
theorem irreducibleSpace_def (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] :
IrreducibleSpace X ↔ IsIrreducible (⊤ : Set X) :=
⟨@IrreducibleSpace.isIrreducible_univ X _, fun h =>
haveI : PreirreducibleSpace X := ⟨h.2⟩
⟨⟨h.1.some⟩⟩⟩
#align irreducible_space_def irreducibleSpace_def
theorem nonempty_preirreducible_inter [PreirreducibleSpace X] :
IsOpen s → IsOpen t → s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
simpa only [univ_inter, univ_subset_iff] using
@PreirreducibleSpace.isPreirreducible_univ X _ _ s t
#align nonempty_preirreducible_inter nonempty_preirreducible_inter
/-- In a (pre)irreducible space, a nonempty open set is dense. -/
protected theorem IsOpen.dense [PreirreducibleSpace X] (ho : IsOpen s) (hne : s.Nonempty) :
Dense s :=
dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun _t hto htne => nonempty_preirreducible_inter hto ho htne hne
#align is_open.dense IsOpen.dense
theorem IsPreirreducible.image (H : IsPreirreducible s) (f : X → Y) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsPreirreducible (f '' s) := by
rintro u v hu hv ⟨_, ⟨⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, hxu⟩⟩ ⟨_, ⟨⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hyv⟩⟩
rw [← mem_preimage] at hxu hyv
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩
have := H u' v' hu' hv'
rw [inter_comm s u', ← u'_eq] at this
rw [inter_comm s v', ← v'_eq] at this
rcases this ⟨x, hxu, hx⟩ ⟨y, hyv, hy⟩ with ⟨x, hxs, hxu', hxv'⟩
refine ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs, ?_, ?_⟩
all_goals
rw [← mem_preimage]
apply mem_of_mem_inter_left
show x ∈ _ ∩ s
simp [*]
#align is_preirreducible.image IsPreirreducible.image
theorem IsIrreducible.image (H : IsIrreducible s) (f : X → Y) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsIrreducible (f '' s) :=
⟨H.nonempty.image _, H.isPreirreducible.image f hf⟩
#align is_irreducible.image IsIrreducible.image
| Mathlib/Topology/Irreducible.lean | 226 | 230 | theorem Subtype.preirreducibleSpace (h : IsPreirreducible s) : PreirreducibleSpace s where
isPreirreducible_univ := by |
rintro _ _ ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩ ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩ ⟨⟨x, hxs⟩, -, hxu⟩ ⟨⟨y, hys⟩, -, hyv⟩
rcases h u v hu hv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩ with ⟨x, hxs, ⟨hxu, hxv⟩⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, hxs⟩, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, ⟨hxu, hxv⟩⟩⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudriashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudriashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basis
#align_import analysis.convex.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
/-!
# Convex combinations
This file defines convex combinations of points in a vector space.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.centerMass`: Center of mass of a finite family of points.
## Implementation notes
We divide by the sum of the weights in the definition of `Finset.centerMass` because of the way
mathematical arguments go: one doesn't change weights, but merely adds some. This also makes a few
lemmas unconditional on the sum of the weights being `1`.
-/
open Set Function
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise
universe u u'
variable {R R' E F ι ι' α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField R] [LinearOrderedField R'] [AddCommGroup E]
[AddCommGroup F] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Module R E] [Module R F] [Module R α]
[OrderedSMul R α] {s : Set E}
/-- Center of mass of a finite collection of points with prescribed weights.
Note that we require neither `0 ≤ w i` nor `∑ w = 1`. -/
def Finset.centerMass (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E) : E :=
(∑ i ∈ t, w i)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i
#align finset.center_mass Finset.centerMass
variable (i j : ι) (c : R) (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
open Finset
theorem Finset.centerMass_empty : (∅ : Finset ι).centerMass w z = 0 := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_empty, smul_zero]
#align finset.center_mass_empty Finset.centerMass_empty
theorem Finset.centerMass_pair (hne : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = (w i / (w i + w j)) • z i + (w j / (w i + w j)) • z j := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_pair hne, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, div_eq_inv_mul]
#align finset.center_mass_pair Finset.centerMass_pair
variable {w}
theorem Finset.centerMass_insert (ha : i ∉ t) (hw : ∑ j ∈ t, w j ≠ 0) :
(insert i t).centerMass w z =
(w i / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • z i +
((∑ j ∈ t, w j) / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert ha, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
congr 2
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_inv_cancel hw, one_div]
#align finset.center_mass_insert Finset.centerMass_insert
theorem Finset.centerMass_singleton (hw : w i ≠ 0) : ({i} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = z i := by
rw [centerMass, sum_singleton, sum_singleton, ← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hw, one_smul]
#align finset.center_mass_singleton Finset.centerMass_singleton
@[simp] lemma Finset.centerMass_neg_left : t.centerMass (-w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, inv_neg]
lemma Finset.centerMass_smul_left {c : R'} [Module R' R] [Module R' E] [SMulCommClass R' R R]
[IsScalarTower R' R R] [SMulCommClass R R' E] [IsScalarTower R' R E] (hc : c ≠ 0) :
t.centerMass (c • w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, -smul_assoc, smul_assoc c, ← smul_sum, smul_inv₀, smul_smul_smul_comm, hc]
theorem Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 (hw : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) :
t.centerMass w z = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, hw, inv_one, one_smul]
#align finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1
theorem Finset.centerMass_smul : (t.centerMass w fun i => c • z i) = c • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, Finset.smul_sum, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, mul_comm c, mul_assoc]
#align finset.center_mass_smul Finset.centerMass_smul
/-- A convex combination of two centers of mass is a center of mass as well. This version
deals with two different index types. -/
theorem Finset.centerMass_segment' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset ι') (ws : ι → R) (zs : ι → E)
(wt : ι' → R) (zt : ι' → E) (hws : ∑ i ∈ s, ws i = 1) (hwt : ∑ i ∈ t, wt i = 1) (a b : R)
(hab : a + b = 1) : a • s.centerMass ws zs + b • t.centerMass wt zt = (s.disjSum t).centerMass
(Sum.elim (fun i => a * ws i) fun j => b * wt j) (Sum.elim zs zt) := by
rw [s.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hws, t.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hwt, smul_sum, smul_sum, ←
Finset.sum_sum_elim, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1]
· congr with ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr, mul_smul]
· rw [sum_sum_elim, ← mul_sum, ← mul_sum, hws, hwt, mul_one, mul_one, hab]
#align finset.center_mass_segment' Finset.centerMass_segment'
/-- A convex combination of two centers of mass is a center of mass as well. This version
works if two centers of mass share the set of original points. -/
theorem Finset.centerMass_segment (s : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
(hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) (a b : R) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • s.centerMass w₁ z + b • s.centerMass w₂ z =
s.centerMass (fun i => a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i) z := by
have hw : (∑ i ∈ s, (a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i)) = 1 := by
simp only [← mul_sum, sum_add_distrib, mul_one, *]
simp only [Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hw,
smul_sum, sum_add_distrib, add_smul, mul_smul, *]
#align finset.center_mass_segment Finset.centerMass_segment
theorem Finset.centerMass_ite_eq (hi : i ∈ t) :
t.centerMass (fun j => if i = j then (1 : R) else 0) z = z i := by
rw [Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1]
· trans ∑ j ∈ t, if i = j then z i else 0
· congr with i
split_ifs with h
exacts [h ▸ one_smul _ _, zero_smul _ _]
· rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi]
· rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi]
#align finset.center_mass_ite_eq Finset.centerMass_ite_eq
variable {t}
theorem Finset.centerMass_subset {t' : Finset ι} (ht : t ⊆ t') (h : ∀ i ∈ t', i ∉ t → w i = 0) :
t.centerMass w z = t'.centerMass w z := by
rw [centerMass, sum_subset ht h, smul_sum, centerMass, smul_sum]
apply sum_subset ht
intro i hit' hit
rw [h i hit' hit, zero_smul, smul_zero]
#align finset.center_mass_subset Finset.centerMass_subset
theorem Finset.centerMass_filter_ne_zero :
(t.filter fun i => w i ≠ 0).centerMass w z = t.centerMass w z :=
Finset.centerMass_subset z (filter_subset _ _) fun i hit hit' => by
simpa only [hit, mem_filter, true_and_iff, Ne, Classical.not_not] using hit'
#align finset.center_mass_filter_ne_zero Finset.centerMass_filter_ne_zero
namespace Finset
theorem centerMass_le_sup {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ s, w i) :
s.centerMass w f ≤ s.sup' (nonempty_of_ne_empty <| by rintro rfl; simp at hw₁) f := by
rw [centerMass, inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos hw₁, sum_smul]
exact sum_le_sum fun i hi => smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left (le_sup' _ hi) <| hw₀ i hi
#align finset.center_mass_le_sup Finset.centerMass_le_sup
theorem inf_le_centerMass {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ s, w i) :
s.inf' (nonempty_of_ne_empty <| by rintro rfl; simp at hw₁) f ≤ s.centerMass w f :=
@centerMass_le_sup R _ αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hw₀ hw₁
#align finset.inf_le_center_mass Finset.inf_le_centerMass
end Finset
variable {z}
lemma Finset.centerMass_of_sum_add_sum_eq_zero {s t : Finset ι}
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i + ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 0) (hz : ∑ i ∈ s, w i • z i + ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i = 0) :
s.centerMass w z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right hw, eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hz, ← neg_inv]
/-- The center of mass of a finite subset of a convex set belongs to the set
provided that all weights are non-negative, and the total weight is positive. -/
theorem Convex.centerMass_mem (hs : Convex R s) :
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → (0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) → (∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) → t.centerMass w z ∈ s := by
induction' t using Finset.induction with i t hi ht
· simp [lt_irrefl]
intro h₀ hpos hmem
have zi : z i ∈ s := hmem _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
have hs₀ : ∀ j ∈ t, 0 ≤ w j := fun j hj => h₀ j <| mem_insert_of_mem hj
rw [sum_insert hi] at hpos
by_cases hsum_t : ∑ j ∈ t, w j = 0
· have ws : ∀ j ∈ t, w j = 0 := (sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg hs₀).1 hsum_t
have wz : ∑ j ∈ t, w j • z j = 0 := sum_eq_zero fun i hi => by simp [ws i hi]
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert hi, wz, hsum_t, add_zero]
simp only [hsum_t, add_zero] at hpos
rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel (ne_of_gt hpos), one_smul]
exact zi
· rw [Finset.centerMass_insert _ _ _ hi hsum_t]
refine convex_iff_div.1 hs zi (ht hs₀ ?_ ?_) ?_ (sum_nonneg hs₀) hpos
· exact lt_of_le_of_ne (sum_nonneg hs₀) (Ne.symm hsum_t)
· intro j hj
exact hmem j (mem_insert_of_mem hj)
· exact h₀ _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
#align convex.center_mass_mem Convex.centerMass_mem
theorem Convex.sum_mem (hs : Convex R s) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1)
(hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) : (∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i) ∈ s := by
simpa only [h₁, centerMass, inv_one, one_smul] using
hs.centerMass_mem h₀ (h₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) hz
#align convex.sum_mem Convex.sum_mem
/-- A version of `Convex.sum_mem` for `finsum`s. If `s` is a convex set, `w : ι → R` is a family of
nonnegative weights with sum one and `z : ι → E` is a family of elements of a module over `R` such
that `z i ∈ s` whenever `w i ≠ 0`, then the sum `∑ᶠ i, w i • z i` belongs to `s`. See also
`PartitionOfUnity.finsum_smul_mem_convex`. -/
theorem Convex.finsum_mem {ι : Sort*} {w : ι → R} {z : ι → E} {s : Set E} (hs : Convex R s)
(h₀ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ᶠ i, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i, w i ≠ 0 → z i ∈ s) :
(∑ᶠ i, w i • z i) ∈ s := by
have hfin_w : (support (w ∘ PLift.down)).Finite := by
by_contra H
rw [finsum, dif_neg H] at h₁
exact zero_ne_one h₁
have hsub : support ((fun i => w i • z i) ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ hfin_w.toFinset :=
(support_smul_subset_left _ _).trans hfin_w.coe_toFinset.ge
rw [finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset hsub]
refine hs.sum_mem (fun _ _ => h₀ _) ?_ fun i hi => hz _ ?_
· rwa [finsum, dif_pos hfin_w] at h₁
· rwa [hfin_w.mem_toFinset] at hi
#align convex.finsum_mem Convex.finsum_mem
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Combination.lean | 216 | 232 | theorem convex_iff_sum_mem : Convex R s ↔ ∀ (t : Finset E) (w : E → R),
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1 → (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) → (∑ x ∈ t, w x • x) ∈ s := by |
refine ⟨fun hs t w hw₀ hw₁ hts => hs.sum_mem hw₀ hw₁ hts, ?_⟩
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
by_cases h_cases : x = y
· rw [h_cases, ← add_smul, hab, one_smul]
exact hy
· convert h {x, y} (fun z => if z = y then b else a) _ _ _
-- Porting note: Original proof had 2 `simp_intro i hi`
· simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos trivial]
· intro i _
simp only
split_ifs <;> assumption
· simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos trivial, hab]
· intro i hi
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_insert] at hi
cases hi <;> subst i <;> assumption
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
#align_import data.polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
#align polynomial Polynomial
#align polynomial.of_finsupp Polynomial.ofFinsupp
#align polynomial.to_finsupp Polynomial.toFinsupp
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
#align polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp Polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
#align polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp Polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
#align polynomial.eta Polynomial.eta
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
#align polynomial.has_zero Polynomial.zero
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
#align polynomial.one Polynomial.one
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
#align polynomial.has_add Polynomial.add'
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
#align polynomial.has_neg Polynomial.neg'
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
#align polynomial.has_sub Polynomial.sub
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
#align polynomial.has_mul Polynomial.mul'
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
#align polynomial.smul_zero_class Polynomial.smulZeroClass
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
#align polynomial.has_pow Polynomial.pow
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_zero Polynomial.ofFinsupp_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_one Polynomial.ofFinsupp_one
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_add Polynomial.ofFinsupp_add
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_neg Polynomial.ofFinsupp_neg
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_sub Polynomial.ofFinsupp_sub
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_mul Polynomial.ofFinsupp_mul
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_smul Polynomial.ofFinsupp_smul
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_pow Polynomial.ofFinsupp_pow
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_zero Polynomial.toFinsupp_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_one Polynomial.toFinsupp_one
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_add Polynomial.toFinsupp_add
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_neg Polynomial.toFinsupp_neg
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_sub Polynomial.toFinsupp_sub
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_mul Polynomial.toFinsupp_mul
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_smul Polynomial.toFinsupp_smul
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_pow Polynomial.toFinsupp_pow
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
#align is_smul_regular.polynomial IsSMulRegular.polynomial
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_injective Polynomial.toFinsupp_injective
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_inj Polynomial.toFinsupp_inj
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_eq_zero Polynomial.toFinsupp_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_eq_one Polynomial.toFinsupp_eq_one
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_inj Polynomial.ofFinsupp_inj
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_eq_zero Polynomial.ofFinsupp_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_eq_one Polynomial.ofFinsupp_eq_one
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
#align polynomial.inhabited Polynomial.inhabited
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
#align polynomial.has_nat_cast Polynomial.instNatCast
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero toFinsupp_one
toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_smul _ _) toFinsupp_pow fun _ => rfl with
toAdd := Polynomial.add'
toMul := Polynomial.mul'
toZero := Polynomial.zero
toOne := Polynomial.one
nsmul := (· • ·)
npow := fun n x => (x ^ n) }
#align polynomial.semiring Polynomial.semiring
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective
toFinsupp_smul with
toSMulZeroClass := Polynomial.smulZeroClass }
#align polynomial.distrib_smul Polynomial.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul with
toSMul := Polynomial.smulZeroClass.toSMul }
#align polynomial.distrib_mul_action Polynomial.distribMulAction
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
#align polynomial.has_faithful_smul Polynomial.faithfulSMul
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective
toFinsupp_smul with
toDistribMulAction := Polynomial.distribMulAction }
#align polynomial.module Polynomial.module
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
#align polynomial.smul_comm_class Polynomial.smulCommClass
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
#align polynomial.is_scalar_tower Polynomial.isScalarTower
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩;
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
#align polynomial.is_scalar_tower_right Polynomial.isScalarTower_right
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
#align polynomial.is_central_scalar Polynomial.isCentralScalar
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
#align polynomial.unique Polynomial.unique
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso Polynomial.toFinsuppIso
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso_apply Polynomial.toFinsuppIso_apply
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso_symm_apply Polynomial.toFinsuppIso_symm_apply
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_sum Polynomial.ofFinsupp_sum
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_sum Polynomial.toFinsupp_sum
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient.
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: The original generated theorem is same to `support_ofFinsupp` and
-- the new generated theorem is different, so this attribute should be
-- removed.
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
#align polynomial.support Polynomial.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
#align polynomial.support_of_finsupp Polynomial.support_ofFinsupp
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.support_zero Polynomial.support_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
#align polynomial.support_eq_empty Polynomial.support_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : p.support.card = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.card_support_eq_zero Polynomial.card_support_eq_zero
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
#align polynomial.monomial Polynomial.monomial
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_monomial Polynomial.toFinsupp_monomial
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_single Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_right Polynomial.monomial_zero_right
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_one Polynomial.monomial_zero_one
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
#align polynomial.monomial_add Polynomial.monomial_add
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_monomial Polynomial.monomial_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
· simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, mul_add, add_comm]
#align polynomial.monomial_pow Polynomial.monomial_pow
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp; rw [smul_single]
#align polynomial.smul_monomial Polynomial.smul_monomial
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
#align polynomial.monomial_injective Polynomial.monomial_injective
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
#align polynomial.monomial_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.monomial_eq_zero_iff
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
#align polynomial.support_add Polynomial.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
#align polynomial.C Polynomial.C
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_left Polynomial.monomial_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_C Polynomial.toFinsupp_C
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.C_0 Polynomial.C_0
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.C_1 Polynomial.C_1
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
#align polynomial.C_mul Polynomial.C_mul
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
#align polynomial.C_add Polynomial.C_add
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
#align polynomial.smul_C Polynomial.smul_C
set_option linter.deprecated false in
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_bit0 : C (bit0 a) = bit0 (C a) :=
C_add
#align polynomial.C_bit0 Polynomial.C_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_bit1 : C (bit1 a) = bit1 (C a) := by simp [bit1, C_bit0]
#align polynomial.C_bit1 Polynomial.C_bit1
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
#align polynomial.C_pow Polynomial.C_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
#align polynomial.C_eq_nat_cast Polynomial.C_eq_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias C_eq_nat_cast := C_eq_natCast
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
#align polynomial.C_mul_monomial Polynomial.C_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_C Polynomial.monomial_mul_C
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
#align polynomial.X Polynomial.X
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_one_one_eq_X Polynomial.monomial_one_one_eq_X
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp [monomial_zero_one]
· rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow Polynomial.monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_X Polynomial.toFinsupp_X
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
-- Porting note: `ofFinsupp.injEq` is required.
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
-- Porting note: Was `ext`.
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
#align polynomial.X_mul Polynomial.X_mul
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul Polynomial.X_pow_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
#align polynomial.X_mul_C Polynomial.X_mul_C
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_C Polynomial.X_pow_mul_C
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc Polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc_C Polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc_C
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
#align polynomial.commute_X Polynomial.commute_X
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
#align polynomial.commute_X_pow Polynomial.commute_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
erw [monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_X Polynomial.monomial_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_X_pow Polynomial.monomial_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
#align polynomial.X_mul_monomial Polynomial.X_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_monomial Polynomial.X_pow_mul_monomial
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: The original generated theorem is same to `coeff_ofFinsupp` and
-- the new generated theorem is different, so this attribute should be
-- removed.
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
#align polynomial.coeff Polynomial.coeff
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 679 | 682 | theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by |
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
-- Porting note: `ofFinsupp.injEq` is required.
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.graded_algebra.homogeneous_localization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
/-!
# Homogeneous Localization
## Notation
- `ι` is a commutative monoid;
- `R` is a commutative semiring;
- `A` is a commutative ring and an `R`-algebra;
- `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A` is the grading of `A`;
- `x : Submonoid A` is a submonoid
## Main definitions and results
This file constructs the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and denominator have the same grading,
i.e. `{a/b ∈ Aₓ | ∃ (i : ι), a ∈ 𝒜ᵢ ∧ b ∈ 𝒜ᵢ}`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg`: a structure with a numerator and denominator field
where they are required to have the same grading.
However `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` cannot have a ring structure for many reasons, for example if `c`
is a `NumDenSameDeg`, then generally, `c + (-c)` is not necessarily `0` for degree reasons ---
`0` is considered to have grade zero (see `deg_zero`) but `c + (-c)` has the same degree as `c`. To
circumvent this, we quotient `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` by the kernel of `c ↦ c.num / c.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding`: for `x : Submonoid A` and any
`c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a denominator of the same degree,
we get an element `c.num / c.den` of `Aₓ`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization`: `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` quotiented by kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.val`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.val` is an element
of `Aₓ`. In another word, one can view `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as a subring of `Aₓ`
through `HomogeneousLocalization.val`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.num : A` is the
numerator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.den : A` is the
denominator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.deg : ι` is the
degree of `f` such that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg` and `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`
(see `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg` and `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`).
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.num_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.den_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.eq_num_div_den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.val : Aₓ` is equal to `f.num / f.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.localRing`: `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is a local ring when `x` is
the complement of some prime ideals.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.map`: Let `A` and `B` be two graded rings and `g : A → B` a grading
preserving ring map. If `P ≤ A` and `Q ≤ B` are submonoids such that `P ≤ g⁻¹(Q)`, then `g`
induces a ring map between the homogeneous localization of `A` at `P` and the homogeneous
localization of `B` at `Q`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
noncomputable section
open DirectSum Pointwise
open DirectSum SetLike
variable {ι R A : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι]
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A) [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
variable (x : Submonoid A)
local notation "at " x => Localization x
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
section
/-- Let `x` be a submonoid of `A`, then `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` is a structure with a numerator and a
denominator with same grading such that the denominator is contained in `x`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure NumDenSameDeg where
deg : ι
(num den : 𝒜 deg)
den_mem : (den : A) ∈ x
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
end
namespace NumDenSameDeg
open SetLike.GradedMonoid Submodule
variable {𝒜}
@[ext]
theorem ext {c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x} (hdeg : c1.deg = c2.deg) (hnum : (c1.num : A) = c2.num)
(hden : (c1.den : A) = c2.den) : c1 = c2 := by
rcases c1 with ⟨i1, ⟨n1, hn1⟩, ⟨d1, hd1⟩, h1⟩
rcases c2 with ⟨i2, ⟨n2, hn2⟩, ⟨d2, hd2⟩, h2⟩
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at *
subst hdeg hnum hden
congr
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.ext HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.ext
instance : One (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one :=
{ deg := 0
-- Porting note: Changed `one_mem` to `GradedOne.one_mem`
num := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.one_mem _ }
@[simp]
theorem deg_one : (1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_one HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_one
@[simp]
theorem num_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num : A) = 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_one HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_one
@[simp]
theorem den_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_one HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_one
instance : Zero (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
zero := ⟨0, 0, ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩, Submonoid.one_mem _⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_zero HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_zero
@[simp]
theorem num_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num = 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_zero HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_zero
@[simp]
theorem den_zero : ((0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_zero HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_zero
instance : Mul (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
mul p q :=
{ deg := p.deg + q.deg
-- Porting note: Changed `mul_mem` to `GradedMul.mul_mem`
num := ⟨p.num * q.num, GradedMul.mul_mem p.num.prop q.num.prop⟩
den := ⟨p.den * q.den, GradedMul.mul_mem p.den.prop q.den.prop⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ p.den_mem q.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 * c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_mul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_mul
@[simp]
theorem num_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).num : A) = c1.num * c2.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_mul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_mul
@[simp]
theorem den_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_mul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_mul
instance : Add (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
add c1 c2 :=
{ deg := c1.deg + c2.deg
num := ⟨c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num,
add_mem (GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.num.2)
(add_comm c2.deg c1.deg ▸ GradedMul.mul_mem c2.den.2 c1.num.2)⟩
den := ⟨c1.den * c2.den, GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.den.2⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ c1.den_mem c2.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 + c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_add HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_add
@[simp]
theorem num_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
((c1 + c2).num : A) = c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_add HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_add
@[simp]
theorem den_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 + c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_add HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_add
instance : Neg (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
neg c := ⟨c.deg, ⟨-c.num, neg_mem c.num.2⟩, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (-c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_neg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_neg
@[simp]
theorem num_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).num : A) = -c.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_neg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_neg
@[simp]
theorem den_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_neg HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_neg
instance : CommMonoid (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc c1 c2 c3 := ext _ (add_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _)
one_mul c := ext _ (zero_add _) (one_mul _) (one_mul _)
mul_one c := ext _ (add_zero _) (mul_one _) (mul_one _)
mul_comm c1 c2 := ext _ (add_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _)
instance : Pow (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow c n :=
⟨n • c.deg, @GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.num,
@GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.den, by
induction' n with n ih
· simpa only [Nat.zero_eq, coe_gnpow, pow_zero] using Submonoid.one_mem _
· simpa only [pow_succ, coe_gnpow] using x.mul_mem ih c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : (c ^ n).deg = n • c.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_pow HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_pow
@[simp]
theorem num_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).num : A) = (c.num : A) ^ n :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_pow HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_pow
@[simp]
theorem den_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).den : A) = (c.den : A) ^ n :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_pow HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_pow
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
instance : SMul α (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
smul m c := ⟨c.deg, m • c.num, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : (m • c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.deg_smul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.deg_smul
@[simp]
theorem num_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).num : A) = m • c.num :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.num_smul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.num_smul
@[simp]
theorem den_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.denom_smul HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.den_smul
end SMul
variable (𝒜)
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A` and any `p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a
denominator of the same degree, we get an element `p.num / p.den` of `Aₓ`.
-/
def embedding (p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Localization.mk p.num ⟨p.den, p.den_mem⟩
#align homogeneous_localization.num_denom_same_deg.embedding HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding
end NumDenSameDeg
end HomogeneousLocalization
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A`, `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` modulo the
kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`. This is essentially the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and
denominator share the same grading.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def HomogeneousLocalization : Type _ :=
Quotient (Setoid.ker <| HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x)
#align homogeneous_localization HomogeneousLocalization
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
open HomogeneousLocalization HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
variable {𝒜} {x}
/-- Construct an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` from a homogeneous fraction. -/
abbrev mk (y : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x :=
Quotient.mk'' y
lemma mk_surjective : Function.Surjective (mk (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''
/-- View an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as an element of `Aₓ` by forgetting that the
numerator and denominator are of the same grading.
-/
def val (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Quotient.liftOn' y (NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x) fun _ _ => id
#align homogeneous_localization.val HomogeneousLocalization.val
@[simp]
theorem val_mk (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
val (mk i) = Localization.mk (i.num : A) ⟨i.den, i.den_mem⟩ :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.val_mk' HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk
variable (x)
@[ext]
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (HomogeneousLocalization.val (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
fun a b => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' a b fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound' h
#align homogeneous_localization.val_injective HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective
variable (𝒜) {x} in
lemma subsingleton (hx : 0 ∈ x) : Subsingleton (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
have := IsLocalization.subsingleton (S := at x) hx
(HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)).subsingleton
instance hasPow : Pow (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow z n :=
(Quotient.map' (· ^ n) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_pow, den_pow]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => z ^ n) h <;> erw [Localization.mk_pow] <;> rfl :
HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x → HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x)
z
#align homogeneous_localization.has_pow HomogeneousLocalization.hasPow
@[simp] lemma mk_pow (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : mk (i ^ n) = mk i ^ n := rfl
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
variable [IsScalarTower α A A]
instance : SMul α (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
smul m := Quotient.map' (m • ·) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_smul, den_smul]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => m • z) h <;> rw [Localization.smul_mk]
@[simp] lemma mk_smul (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : mk (m • i) = m • mk i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_smul (n : α) : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (n • y).val = n • y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ by rw [← mk_smul, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.smul_mk]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.smul_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_smul
end SMul
instance : Neg (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
neg := Quotient.map' Neg.neg fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_neg, den_neg, ← Localization.neg_mk]
exact congr_arg Neg.neg h
@[simp] lemma mk_neg (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (-i) = -mk i := rfl
instance : Add (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
add :=
Quotient.map₂' (· + ·)
fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) c3 c4
(h' : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_add, den_add, ← Localization.add_mk]
convert congr_arg₂ (· + ·) h h' <;> erw [Localization.add_mk] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_add (i j : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (i + j) = mk i + mk j := rfl
instance : Sub (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where sub z1 z2 := z1 + -z2
instance : Mul (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
mul :=
Quotient.map₂' (· * ·)
fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) c3 c4
(h' : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_mul, den_mul]
convert congr_arg₂ (· * ·) h h' <;> erw [Localization.mk_mul] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_mul (i j : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (i * j) = mk i * mk j := rfl
instance : One (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where one := Quotient.mk'' 1
@[simp] lemma mk_one : mk (1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) = 1 := rfl
instance : Zero (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where zero := Quotient.mk'' 0
@[simp] lemma mk_zero : mk (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_eq : (0 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) = Quotient.mk'' 0 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.zero_eq HomogeneousLocalization.zero_eq
theorem one_eq : (1 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) = Quotient.mk'' 1 :=
rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.one_eq HomogeneousLocalization.one_eq
variable {x}
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : (0 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = 0 :=
Localization.mk_zero _
#align homogeneous_localization.zero_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one : (1 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = 1 :=
Localization.mk_one
#align homogeneous_localization.one_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_one
@[simp]
theorem val_add : ∀ y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (y1 + y2).val = y1.val + y2.val :=
Quotient.ind₂' fun y1 y2 ↦ by rw [← mk_add, val_mk, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.add_mk]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.add_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_add
@[simp]
theorem val_mul : ∀ y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (y1 * y2).val = y1.val * y2.val :=
Quotient.ind₂' fun y1 y2 ↦ by rw [← mk_mul, val_mk, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.mk_mul]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.mul_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_mul
@[simp]
theorem val_neg : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (-y).val = -y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun y ↦ by rw [← mk_neg, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.neg_mk]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.neg_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_neg
@[simp]
theorem val_sub (y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : (y1 - y2).val = y1.val - y2.val := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← val_neg, ← val_add]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.sub_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_sub
@[simp]
theorem val_pow : ∀ (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ), (y ^ n).val = y.val ^ n :=
Quotient.ind' fun y n ↦ by rw [← mk_pow, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.mk_pow]; rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.pow_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_pow
instance : NatCast (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
⟨Nat.unaryCast⟩
instance : IntCast (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
⟨Int.castDef⟩
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = n :=
show val (Nat.unaryCast n) = _ by induction n <;> simp [Nat.unaryCast, *]
#align homogeneous_localization.nat_cast_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_natCast
@[simp]
theorem val_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = n :=
show val (Int.castDef n) = _ by cases n <;> simp [Int.castDef, *]
#align homogeneous_localization.int_cast_val HomogeneousLocalization.val_intCast
instance homogenousLocalizationCommRing : CommRing (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
(HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective x).commRing _ val_zero val_one val_add val_mul val_neg
val_sub (val_smul x · ·) (val_smul x · ·) val_pow val_natCast val_intCast
#align homogeneous_localization.homogenous_localization_comm_ring HomogeneousLocalization.homogenousLocalizationCommRing
instance homogeneousLocalizationAlgebra :
Algebra (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) (Localization x) where
smul p q := p.val * q
toFun := val
map_one' := val_one
map_mul' := val_mul
map_zero' := val_zero
map_add' := val_add
commutes' _ _ := mul_comm _ _
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
#align homogeneous_localization.homogeneous_localization_algebra HomogeneousLocalization.homogeneousLocalizationAlgebra
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_apply (y) :
algebraMap (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) (Localization x) y = y.val := rfl
lemma mk_eq_zero_of_num (f : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (h : f.num = 0) : mk f = 0 := by
apply val_injective
simp only [val_mk, val_zero, h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, Localization.mk_zero]
lemma mk_eq_zero_of_den (f : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (h : f.den = 0) : mk f = 0 := by
have := subsingleton 𝒜 (h ▸ f.den_mem)
exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
end HomogeneousLocalization
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
open HomogeneousLocalization HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
variable {𝒜} {x}
/-- Numerator of an element in `HomogeneousLocalization x`. -/
def num (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : A :=
(Quotient.out' f).num
#align homogeneous_localization.num HomogeneousLocalization.num
/-- Denominator of an element in `HomogeneousLocalization x`. -/
def den (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : A :=
(Quotient.out' f).den
#align homogeneous_localization.denom HomogeneousLocalization.den
/-- For an element in `HomogeneousLocalization x`, degree is the natural number `i` such that
`𝒜 i` contains both numerator and denominator. -/
def deg (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : ι :=
(Quotient.out' f).deg
#align homogeneous_localization.deg HomogeneousLocalization.deg
theorem den_mem (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f.den ∈ x :=
(Quotient.out' f).den_mem
#align homogeneous_localization.denom_mem HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem
theorem num_mem_deg (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg :=
(Quotient.out' f).num.2
#align homogeneous_localization.num_mem_deg HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg
theorem den_mem_deg (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg :=
(Quotient.out' f).den.2
#align homogeneous_localization.denom_mem_deg HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg
theorem eq_num_div_den (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :
f.val = Localization.mk f.num ⟨f.den, f.den_mem⟩ :=
congr_arg HomogeneousLocalization.val (Quotient.out_eq' f).symm
#align homogeneous_localization.eq_num_div_denom HomogeneousLocalization.eq_num_div_den
theorem den_smul_val (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :
f.den • f.val = algebraMap _ _ f.num := by
rw [eq_num_div_den, Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.smul_mk']
exact IsLocalization.mk'_mul_cancel_left _ ⟨_, _⟩
theorem ext_iff_val (f g : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f = g ↔ f.val = g.val :=
⟨congr_arg val, fun e ↦ val_injective x e⟩
#align homogeneous_localization.ext_iff_val HomogeneousLocalization.ext_iff_val
section
variable (𝒜) (𝔭 : Ideal A) [Ideal.IsPrime 𝔭]
/-- Localizing a ring homogeneously at a prime ideal. -/
abbrev AtPrime :=
HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 𝔭.primeCompl
#align homogeneous_localization.at_prime HomogeneousLocalization.AtPrime
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousLocalization.lean | 561 | 575 | theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_val (f : HomogeneousLocalization.AtPrime 𝒜 𝔭) :
IsUnit f.val ↔ IsUnit f := by |
refine ⟨fun h1 ↦ ?_, IsUnit.map (algebraMap _ _)⟩
rcases h1 with ⟨⟨a, b, eq0, eq1⟩, rfl : a = f.val⟩
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := mk_surjective f
obtain ⟨b, s, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective 𝔭.primeCompl b
rw [val_mk, Localization.mk_eq_mk', ← IsLocalization.mk'_mul, IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul,
one_mul, IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists (M := 𝔭.primeCompl)] at eq0
obtain ⟨c, hc : _ = c.1 * (f.den.1 * s.1)⟩ := eq0
have : f.num.1 ∉ 𝔭 := by
exact fun h ↦ mul_mem c.2 (mul_mem f.den_mem s.2)
(hc ▸ Ideal.mul_mem_left _ c.1 (Ideal.mul_mem_right b _ h))
refine isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (Quotient.mk'' ⟨f.1, f.3, f.2, this⟩) ?_
rw [← mk_mul, ext_iff_val, val_mk]
simp [mul_comm f.den.1]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
#align_import algebra.star.free from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"07c3cf2d851866ff7198219ed3fedf42e901f25c"
/-!
# A *-algebra structure on the free algebra.
Reversing words gives a *-structure on the free monoid or on the free algebra on a type.
## Implementation note
We have this in a separate file, rather than in `Algebra.FreeMonoid` and `Algebra.FreeAlgebra`,
to avoid importing `Algebra.Star.Basic` into the entire hierarchy.
-/
namespace FreeMonoid
variable {α : Type*}
instance : StarMul (FreeMonoid α) where
star := List.reverse
star_involutive := List.reverse_reverse
star_mul := List.reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem star_of (x : α) : star (of x) = of x :=
rfl
#align free_monoid.star_of FreeMonoid.star_of
/-- Note that `star_one` is already a global simp lemma, but this one works with dsimp too -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp cannot prove this
theorem star_one : star (1 : FreeMonoid α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align free_monoid.star_one FreeMonoid.star_one
end FreeMonoid
namespace FreeAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {X : Type*}
/-- The star ring formed by reversing the elements of products -/
instance : StarRing (FreeAlgebra R X) where
star := MulOpposite.unop ∘ lift R (MulOpposite.op ∘ ι R)
star_involutive x := by
unfold Star.star
simp only [Function.comp_apply]
let y := lift R (X := X) (MulOpposite.op ∘ ι R)
apply induction (C := fun x ↦ (y (y x).unop).unop = x) _ _ _ _ x
· intros
simp only [AlgHom.commutes, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply, MulOpposite.unop_op]
· intros
simp only [y, lift_ι_apply, Function.comp_apply, MulOpposite.unop_op]
· intros
simp only [*, map_mul, MulOpposite.unop_mul]
· intros
simp only [*, map_add, MulOpposite.unop_add]
star_mul a b := by simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_mul, MulOpposite.unop_mul]
star_add a b := by simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_add, MulOpposite.unop_add]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/Free.lean | 68 | 68 | theorem star_ι (x : X) : star (ι R x) = ι R x := by | simp [star, Star.star]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
#align_import measure_theory.measure.giry_monad from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"56f4cd1ef396e9fd389b5d8371ee9ad91d163625"
/-!
# The Giry monad
Let X be a measurable space. The collection of all measures on X again
forms a measurable space. This construction forms a monad on
measurable spaces and measurable functions, called the Giry monad.
Note that most sources use the term "Giry monad" for the restriction
to *probability* measures. Here we include all measures on X.
See also `MeasureTheory/Category/MeasCat.lean`, containing an upgrade of the type-level
monad to an honest monad of the functor `measure : MeasCat ⥤ MeasCat`.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Giry+monad>
## Tags
giry monad
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open ENNReal
open scoped Classical
open Set Filter
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- Measurability structure on `Measure`: Measures are measurable w.r.t. all projections -/
instance instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace (Measure α) :=
⨆ (s : Set α) (_ : MeasurableSet s), (borel ℝ≥0∞).comap fun μ => μ s
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_space MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableSpace
theorem measurable_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun μ : Measure α => μ s :=
Measurable.of_comap_le <| le_iSup_of_le s <| le_iSup_of_le hs <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_coe MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_coe
theorem measurable_of_measurable_coe (f : β → Measure α)
(h : ∀ (s : Set α), MeasurableSet s → Measurable fun b => f b s) : Measurable f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <|
iSup₂_le fun s hs =>
MeasurableSpace.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 <| by rw [MeasurableSpace.map_comp]; exact h s hs
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe
instance instMeasurableAdd₂ {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} : MeasurableAdd₂ (Measure α) := by
refine ⟨Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
refine Measurable.add ?_ ?_
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp measurable_fst
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp measurable_snd
#align measure_theory.measure.has_measurable_add₂ MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableAdd₂
theorem measurable_measure {μ : α → Measure β} :
Measurable μ ↔ ∀ (s : Set β), MeasurableSet s → Measurable fun b => μ b s :=
⟨fun hμ _s hs => (measurable_coe hs).comp hμ, measurable_of_measurable_coe μ⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_measure
theorem measurable_map (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun μ : Measure α => map f μ := by
refine measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [map_apply hf hs]
exact measurable_coe (hf hs)
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_map MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_map
theorem measurable_dirac : Measurable (Measure.dirac : α → Measure α) := by
refine measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [dirac_apply' _ hs]
exact measurable_one.indicator hs
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_dirac MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_dirac
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/GiryMonad.lean | 91 | 96 | theorem measurable_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun μ : Measure α => ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by |
simp only [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral, hf, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
refine measurable_iSup fun n => Finset.measurable_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
refine Measurable.const_mul ?_ _
exact measurable_coe ((SimpleFunc.eapprox f n).measurableSet_preimage _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Int.Order
/-!
# Lemmas for `linarith`.
Those in the `Linarith` namespace should stay here.
Those outside the `Linarith` namespace may be deleted as they are ported to mathlib4.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Linarith
theorem lt_irrefl {α : Type u} [Preorder α] {a : α} : ¬a < a := _root_.lt_irrefl a
theorem eq_of_eq_of_eq {α} [OrderedSemiring α] {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b = 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem le_of_eq_of_le {α} [OrderedSemiring α] {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a + b ≤ 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {α} [OrderedSemiring α] {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 := by
simp [*]
| Mathlib/Tactic/Linarith/Lemmas.lean | 36 | 37 | theorem le_of_le_of_eq {α} [OrderedSemiring α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b ≤ 0 := by |
simp [*]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
#align_import data.polynomial.expand from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
/-!
# Expand a polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.expand R p f`: expand the polynomial `f` with coefficients in a
commutative semiring `R` by a factor of p, so `expand R p (∑ aₙ xⁿ)` is `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
* `Polynomial.contract p f`: the opposite of `expand`, so it sends `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ` to `∑ aₙ xⁿ`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (p q : ℕ)
/-- Expand the polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def expand : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ (eval₂RingHom C (X ^ p) : R[X] →+* R[X]) with commutes' := fun _ => eval₂_C _ _ }
#align polynomial.expand Polynomial.expand
theorem coe_expand : (expand R p : R[X] → R[X]) = eval₂ C (X ^ p) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_expand Polynomial.coe_expand
variable {R}
theorem expand_eq_comp_X_pow {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.comp (X ^ p) := rfl
theorem expand_eq_sum {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.sum fun e a => C a * (X ^ p) ^ e := by
simp [expand, eval₂]
#align polynomial.expand_eq_sum Polynomial.expand_eq_sum
@[simp]
theorem expand_C (r : R) : expand R p (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_C Polynomial.expand_C
@[simp]
theorem expand_X : expand R p X = X ^ p :=
eval₂_X _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_X Polynomial.expand_X
@[simp]
theorem expand_monomial (r : R) : expand R p (monomial q r) = monomial (q * p) r := by
simp_rw [← smul_X_eq_monomial, AlgHom.map_smul, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, mul_comm, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_monomial Polynomial.expand_monomial
theorem expand_expand (f : R[X]) : expand R p (expand R q f) = expand R (p * q) f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by simp_rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by simp_rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
simp_rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_expand Polynomial.expand_expand
theorem expand_mul (f : R[X]) : expand R (p * q) f = expand R p (expand R q f) :=
(expand_expand p q f).symm
#align polynomial.expand_mul Polynomial.expand_mul
@[simp]
theorem expand_zero (f : R[X]) : expand R 0 f = C (eval 1 f) := by simp [expand]
#align polynomial.expand_zero Polynomial.expand_zero
@[simp]
theorem expand_one (f : R[X]) : expand R 1 f = f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_one]
#align polynomial.expand_one Polynomial.expand_one
theorem expand_pow (f : R[X]) : expand R (p ^ q) f = (expand R p)^[q] f :=
Nat.recOn q (by rw [pow_zero, expand_one, Function.iterate_zero, id]) fun n ih => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', pow_succ', expand_mul, ih]
#align polynomial.expand_pow Polynomial.expand_pow
theorem derivative_expand (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.derivative (expand R p f) =
expand R p (Polynomial.derivative f) * (p * (X ^ (p - 1) : R[X])) := by
rw [coe_expand, derivative_eval₂_C, derivative_pow, C_eq_natCast, derivative_X, mul_one]
#align polynomial.derivative_expand Polynomial.derivative_expand
theorem coeff_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff n = if p ∣ n then f.coeff (n / p) else 0 := by
simp only [expand_eq_sum]
simp_rw [coeff_sum, ← pow_mul, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial, sum]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (n / p), Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ hb2
rw [if_neg]
intro hb3
apply hb2
rw [← hb3, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left b hp]
· intro hn
rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hn]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro k _
rw [if_neg]
exact fun hkn => h ⟨k, hkn.symm⟩
#align polynomial.coeff_expand Polynomial.coeff_expand
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (n * p) = f.coeff n := by
rw [coeff_expand hp, if_pos (dvd_mul_left _ _), Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp]
#align polynomial.coeff_expand_mul Polynomial.coeff_expand_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul' {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (p * n) = f.coeff n := by rw [mul_comm, coeff_expand_mul hp]
#align polynomial.coeff_expand_mul' Polynomial.coeff_expand_mul'
/-- Expansion is injective. -/
theorem expand_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : Function.Injective (expand R n) := fun g g' H =>
ext fun k => by rw [← coeff_expand_mul hn, H, coeff_expand_mul hn]
#align polynomial.expand_injective Polynomial.expand_injective
theorem expand_inj {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f g : R[X]} : expand R p f = expand R p g ↔ f = g :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff
#align polynomial.expand_inj Polynomial.expand_inj
theorem expand_eq_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff' (map_zero _)
#align polynomial.expand_eq_zero Polynomial.expand_eq_zero
theorem expand_ne_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f ≠ 0 ↔ f ≠ 0 :=
(expand_eq_zero hp).not
#align polynomial.expand_ne_zero Polynomial.expand_ne_zero
theorem expand_eq_C {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} {r : R} : expand R p f = C r ↔ f = C r := by
rw [← expand_C, expand_inj hp, expand_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_eq_C Polynomial.expand_eq_C
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Expand.lean | 153 | 172 | theorem natDegree_expand (p : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : (expand R p f).natDegree = f.natDegree * p := by |
rcases p.eq_zero_or_pos with hp | hp
· rw [hp, coe_expand, pow_zero, mul_zero, ← C_1, eval₂_hom, natDegree_C]
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, AlgHom.map_zero, natDegree_zero, zero_mul]
have hf1 : expand R p f ≠ 0 := mt (expand_eq_zero hp).1 hf
rw [← WithBot.coe_eq_coe]
convert (degree_eq_natDegree hf1).symm -- Porting note: was `rw [degree_eq_natDegree hf1]`
symm
refine le_antisymm ((degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun n hn => ?_) ?_
· rw [coeff_expand hp]
split_ifs with hpn
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
contrapose! hn
erw [WithBot.coe_le_coe, ← Nat.div_mul_cancel hpn]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_right p hn
· rfl
· refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
erw [coeff_expand_mul hp, ← leadingCoeff]
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Support
#align_import topology.uniform_space.compact from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"735b22f8f9ff9792cf4212d7cb051c4c994bc685"
/-!
# Compact separated uniform spaces
## Main statements
* `compactSpace_uniformity`: On a compact uniform space, the topology determines the
uniform structure, entourages are exactly the neighborhoods of the diagonal.
* `uniformSpace_of_compact_t2`: every compact T2 topological structure is induced by a uniform
structure. This uniform structure is described in the previous item.
* **Heine-Cantor** theorem: continuous functions on compact uniform spaces with values in uniform
spaces are automatically uniformly continuous. There are several variations, the main one is
`CompactSpace.uniformContinuous_of_continuous`.
## Implementation notes
The construction `uniformSpace_of_compact_t2` is not declared as an instance, as it would badly
loop.
## Tags
uniform space, uniform continuity, compact space
-/
open scoped Classical
open Uniformity Topology Filter UniformSpace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
/-!
### Uniformity on compact spaces
-/
/-- On a compact uniform space, the topology determines the uniform structure, entourages are
exactly the neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_eq_uniformity [CompactSpace α] : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) = 𝓤 α := by
refine nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity.antisymm ?_
have :
(𝓤 (α × α)).HasBasis (fun U => U ∈ 𝓤 α) fun U =>
(fun p : (α × α) × α × α => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), p.1.2, p.2.2)) ⁻¹' U ×ˢ U := by
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
exact (𝓤 α).basis_sets.prod_self.comap _
refine (isCompact_diagonal.nhdsSet_basis_uniformity this).ge_iff.2 fun U hU => ?_
exact mem_of_superset hU fun ⟨x, y⟩ hxy => mem_iUnion₂.2
⟨(x, x), rfl, refl_mem_uniformity hU, hxy⟩
#align nhds_set_diagonal_eq_uniformity nhdsSet_diagonal_eq_uniformity
/-- On a compact uniform space, the topology determines the uniform structure, entourages are
exactly the neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem compactSpace_uniformity [CompactSpace α] : 𝓤 α = ⨆ x, 𝓝 (x, x) :=
nhdsSet_diagonal_eq_uniformity.symm.trans (nhdsSet_diagonal _)
#align compact_space_uniformity compactSpace_uniformity
theorem unique_uniformity_of_compact [t : TopologicalSpace γ] [CompactSpace γ]
{u u' : UniformSpace γ} (h : u.toTopologicalSpace = t) (h' : u'.toTopologicalSpace = t) :
u = u' := by
refine UniformSpace.ext ?_
have : @CompactSpace γ u.toTopologicalSpace := by rwa [h]
have : @CompactSpace γ u'.toTopologicalSpace := by rwa [h']
rw [@compactSpace_uniformity _ u, compactSpace_uniformity, h, h']
#align unique_uniformity_of_compact unique_uniformity_of_compact
/-- The unique uniform structure inducing a given compact topological structure. -/
def uniformSpaceOfCompactT2 [TopologicalSpace γ] [CompactSpace γ] [T2Space γ] : UniformSpace γ where
uniformity := 𝓝ˢ (diagonal γ)
symm := continuous_swap.tendsto_nhdsSet fun x => Eq.symm
comp := by
/- This is the difficult part of the proof. We need to prove that, for each neighborhood `W`
of the diagonal `Δ`, there exists a smaller neighborhood `V` such that `V ○ V ⊆ W`.
-/
set 𝓝Δ := 𝓝ˢ (diagonal γ)
-- The filter of neighborhoods of Δ
set F := 𝓝Δ.lift' fun s : Set (γ × γ) => s ○ s
-- Compositions of neighborhoods of Δ
-- If this weren't true, then there would be V ∈ 𝓝Δ such that F ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ ≠ ⊥
rw [le_iff_forall_inf_principal_compl]
intro V V_in
by_contra H
haveI : NeBot (F ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ) := ⟨H⟩
-- Hence compactness would give us a cluster point (x, y) for F ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ
obtain ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy⟩ : ∃ p : γ × γ, ClusterPt p (F ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ) := exists_clusterPt_of_compactSpace _
-- In particular (x, y) is a cluster point of 𝓟 Vᶜ, hence is not in the interior of V,
-- and a fortiori not in Δ, so x ≠ y
have clV : ClusterPt (x, y) (𝓟 <| Vᶜ) := hxy.of_inf_right
have : (x, y) ∉ interior V := by
have : (x, y) ∈ closure Vᶜ := by rwa [mem_closure_iff_clusterPt]
rwa [closure_compl] at this
have diag_subset : diagonal γ ⊆ interior V := subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet.2 V_in
have x_ne_y : x ≠ y := mt (@diag_subset (x, y)) this
-- Since γ is compact and Hausdorff, it is T₄, hence T₃.
-- So there are closed neighborhoods V₁ and V₂ of x and y contained in
-- disjoint open neighborhoods U₁ and U₂.
obtain
⟨U₁, _, V₁, V₁_in, U₂, _, V₂, V₂_in, V₁_cl, V₂_cl, U₁_op, U₂_op, VU₁, VU₂, hU₁₂⟩ :=
disjoint_nested_nhds x_ne_y
-- We set U₃ := (V₁ ∪ V₂)ᶜ so that W := U₁ ×ˢ U₁ ∪ U₂ ×ˢ U₂ ∪ U₃ ×ˢ U₃ is an open
-- neighborhood of Δ.
let U₃ := (V₁ ∪ V₂)ᶜ
have U₃_op : IsOpen U₃ := (V₁_cl.union V₂_cl).isOpen_compl
let W := U₁ ×ˢ U₁ ∪ U₂ ×ˢ U₂ ∪ U₃ ×ˢ U₃
have W_in : W ∈ 𝓝Δ := by
rw [mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall]
rintro ⟨z, z'⟩ (rfl : z = z')
refine IsOpen.mem_nhds ?_ ?_
· apply_rules [IsOpen.union, IsOpen.prod]
· simp only [W, mem_union, mem_prod, and_self_iff]
exact (_root_.em _).imp_left fun h => union_subset_union VU₁ VU₂ h
-- So W ○ W ∈ F by definition of F
have : W ○ W ∈ F := @mem_lift' _ _ _ (fun s => s ○ s) _ W_in
-- Porting note: was `by simpa only using mem_lift' W_in`
-- And V₁ ×ˢ V₂ ∈ 𝓝 (x, y)
have hV₁₂ : V₁ ×ˢ V₂ ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) := prod_mem_nhds V₁_in V₂_in
-- But (x, y) is also a cluster point of F so (V₁ ×ˢ V₂) ∩ (W ○ W) ≠ ∅
-- However the construction of W implies (V₁ ×ˢ V₂) ∩ (W ○ W) = ∅.
-- Indeed assume for contradiction there is some (u, v) in the intersection.
obtain ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨u_in, v_in⟩, w, huw, hwv⟩ := clusterPt_iff.mp hxy.of_inf_left hV₁₂ this
-- So u ∈ V₁, v ∈ V₂, and there exists some w such that (u, w) ∈ W and (w ,v) ∈ W.
-- Because u is in V₁ which is disjoint from U₂ and U₃, (u, w) ∈ W forces (u, w) ∈ U₁ ×ˢ U₁.
have uw_in : (u, w) ∈ U₁ ×ˢ U₁ :=
(huw.resolve_right fun h => h.1 <| Or.inl u_in).resolve_right fun h =>
hU₁₂.le_bot ⟨VU₁ u_in, h.1⟩
-- Similarly, because v ∈ V₂, (w ,v) ∈ W forces (w, v) ∈ U₂ ×ˢ U₂.
have wv_in : (w, v) ∈ U₂ ×ˢ U₂ :=
(hwv.resolve_right fun h => h.2 <| Or.inr v_in).resolve_left fun h =>
hU₁₂.le_bot ⟨h.2, VU₂ v_in⟩
-- Hence w ∈ U₁ ∩ U₂ which is empty.
-- So we have a contradiction
exact hU₁₂.le_bot ⟨uw_in.2, wv_in.1⟩
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp_rw [nhdsSet_diagonal, comap_iSup, nhds_prod_eq, comap_prod, (· ∘ ·), comap_id']
rw [iSup_split_single _ x, comap_const_of_mem fun V => mem_of_mem_nhds]
suffices ∀ y ≠ x, comap (fun _ : γ ↦ x) (𝓝 y) ⊓ 𝓝 y ≤ 𝓝 x by simpa
intro y hxy
simp [comap_const_of_not_mem (compl_singleton_mem_nhds hxy) (not_not_intro rfl)]
#align uniform_space_of_compact_t2 uniformSpaceOfCompactT2
/-!
### Heine-Cantor theorem
-/
/-- Heine-Cantor: a continuous function on a compact uniform space is uniformly
continuous. -/
theorem CompactSpace.uniformContinuous_of_continuous [CompactSpace α] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) : UniformContinuous f :=
calc map (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 α)
= map (Prod.map f f) (𝓝ˢ (diagonal α)) := by rw [nhdsSet_diagonal_eq_uniformity]
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ (diagonal β) := (h.prod_map h).tendsto_nhdsSet mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal
_ ≤ 𝓤 β := nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity
#align compact_space.uniform_continuous_of_continuous CompactSpace.uniformContinuous_of_continuous
/-- Heine-Cantor: a continuous function on a compact set of a uniform space is uniformly
continuous. -/
theorem IsCompact.uniformContinuousOn_of_continuous {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : UniformContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict]
rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at hs
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict] at hf
exact CompactSpace.uniformContinuous_of_continuous hf
#align is_compact.uniform_continuous_on_of_continuous IsCompact.uniformContinuousOn_of_continuous
/-- If `s` is compact and `f` is continuous at all points of `s`, then `f` is
"uniformly continuous at the set `s`", i.e. `f x` is close to `f y` whenever `x ∈ s` and `y` is
close to `x` (even if `y` is not itself in `s`, so this is a stronger assertion than
`UniformContinuousOn s`). -/
theorem IsCompact.uniformContinuousAt_of_continuousAt {r : Set (β × β)} {s : Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ContinuousAt f a) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{ x : α × α | x.1 ∈ s → (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
choose U hU T hT hb using fun a ha =>
exists_mem_nhds_ball_subset_of_mem_nhds ((hf a ha).preimage_mem_nhds <| mem_nhds_left _ ht)
obtain ⟨fs, hsU⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' U hU
apply mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem fs).2 fun a _ => hT a a.2)
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ h h₁
obtain ⟨a, ha, haU⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion₂.1 (hsU h₁)
apply htr
refine ⟨f a, htsymm.mk_mem_comm.1 (hb _ _ _ haU ?_), hb _ _ _ haU ?_⟩
exacts [mem_ball_self _ (hT a a.2), mem_iInter₂.1 h a ha]
#align is_compact.uniform_continuous_at_of_continuous_at IsCompact.uniformContinuousAt_of_continuousAt
theorem Continuous.uniformContinuous_of_tendsto_cocompact {f : α → β} {x : β}
(h_cont : Continuous f) (hx : Tendsto f (cocompact α) (𝓝 x)) : UniformContinuous f :=
uniformContinuous_def.2 fun r hr => by
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
obtain ⟨s, hs, hst⟩ := mem_cocompact.1 (hx <| mem_nhds_left _ ht)
apply
mem_of_superset
(symmetrize_mem_uniformity <|
(hs.uniformContinuousAt_of_continuousAt f fun _ _ => h_cont.continuousAt) <|
symmetrize_mem_uniformity hr)
rintro ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ h
by_cases h₁ : b₁ ∈ s; · exact (h.1 h₁).1
by_cases h₂ : b₂ ∈ s; · exact (h.2 h₂).2
apply htr
exact ⟨x, htsymm.mk_mem_comm.1 (hst h₁), hst h₂⟩
#align continuous.uniform_continuous_of_tendsto_cocompact Continuous.uniformContinuous_of_tendsto_cocompact
/-- If `f` has compact multiplicative support, then `f` tends to 1 at infinity. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` has compact support, then `f` tends to zero at infinity."]
theorem HasCompactMulSupport.is_one_at_infty {f : α → γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] [One γ]
(h : HasCompactMulSupport f) : Tendsto f (cocompact α) (𝓝 1) := by
-- Porting note: move to src/topology/support.lean once the port is over
intro N hN
rw [mem_map, mem_cocompact']
refine ⟨mulTSupport f, h.isCompact, ?_⟩
rw [compl_subset_comm]
intro v hv
rw [mem_preimage, image_eq_one_of_nmem_mulTSupport hv]
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hN
#align has_compact_mul_support.is_one_at_infty HasCompactMulSupport.is_one_at_infty
#align has_compact_support.is_zero_at_infty HasCompactSupport.is_zero_at_infty
@[to_additive]
theorem HasCompactMulSupport.uniformContinuous_of_continuous {f : α → β} [One β]
(h1 : HasCompactMulSupport f) (h2 : Continuous f) : UniformContinuous f :=
h2.uniformContinuous_of_tendsto_cocompact h1.is_one_at_infty
#align has_compact_mul_support.uniform_continuous_of_continuous HasCompactMulSupport.uniformContinuous_of_continuous
#align has_compact_support.uniform_continuous_of_continuous HasCompactSupport.uniformContinuous_of_continuous
/-- A family of functions `α → β → γ` tends uniformly to its value at `x` if `α` is locally compact,
`β` is compact and `f` is continuous on `U × (univ : Set β)` for some neighborhood `U` of `x`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Compact.lean | 237 | 244 | theorem ContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly [LocallyCompactSpace α] [CompactSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
{f : α → β → γ} {x : α} {U : Set α} (hxU : U ∈ 𝓝 x) (h : ContinuousOn (↿f) (U ×ˢ univ)) :
TendstoUniformly f (f x) (𝓝 x) := by |
rcases LocallyCompactSpace.local_compact_nhds _ _ hxU with ⟨K, hxK, hKU, hK⟩
have : UniformContinuousOn (↿f) (K ×ˢ univ) :=
IsCompact.uniformContinuousOn_of_continuous (hK.prod isCompact_univ)
(h.mono <| prod_mono hKU Subset.rfl)
exact this.tendstoUniformly hxK
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
#align_import algebra.big_operators.multiset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6c5f73fd6f6cc83122788a80a27cdd54663609f4"
/-!
# Sums and products over multisets
In this file we define products and sums indexed by multisets. This is later used to define products
and sums indexed by finite sets.
## Main declarations
* `Multiset.prod`: `s.prod f` is the product of `f i` over all `i ∈ s`. Not to be mistaken with
the cartesian product `Multiset.product`.
* `Multiset.sum`: `s.sum f` is the sum of `f i` over all `i ∈ s`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {F ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} {m : Multiset ι} {f g : ι → α}
/-- Product of a multiset given a commutative monoid structure on `α`.
`prod {a, b, c} = a * b * c` -/
@[to_additive
"Sum of a multiset given a commutative additive monoid structure on `α`.
`sum {a, b, c} = a + b + c`"]
def prod : Multiset α → α :=
foldr (· * ·) (fun x y z => by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1
#align multiset.prod Multiset.prod
#align multiset.sum Multiset.sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr (s : Multiset α) :
prod s = foldr (· * ·) (fun x y z => by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1 s :=
rfl
#align multiset.prod_eq_foldr Multiset.prod_eq_foldr
#align multiset.sum_eq_foldr Multiset.sum_eq_foldr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldl (s : Multiset α) :
prod s = foldl (· * ·) (fun x y z => by simp [mul_right_comm]) 1 s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).trans (by simp [mul_comm])
#align multiset.prod_eq_foldl Multiset.prod_eq_foldl
#align multiset.sum_eq_foldl Multiset.sum_eq_foldl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem prod_coe (l : List α) : prod ↑l = l.prod :=
prod_eq_foldl _
#align multiset.coe_prod Multiset.prod_coe
#align multiset.coe_sum Multiset.sum_coe
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.prod = s.prod := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toList s]
rw [prod_coe]
#align multiset.prod_to_list Multiset.prod_toList
#align multiset.sum_to_list Multiset.sum_toList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_zero : @prod α _ 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align multiset.prod_zero Multiset.prod_zero
#align multiset.sum_zero Multiset.sum_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (a : α) (s) : prod (a ::ₘ s) = a * prod s :=
foldr_cons _ _ _ _ _
#align multiset.prod_cons Multiset.prod_cons
#align multiset.sum_cons Multiset.sum_cons
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_erase [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∈ s) : a * (s.erase a).prod = s.prod := by
rw [← s.coe_toList, coe_erase, prod_coe, prod_coe, List.prod_erase (mem_toList.2 h)]
#align multiset.prod_erase Multiset.prod_erase
#align multiset.sum_erase Multiset.sum_erase
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map_erase [DecidableEq ι] {a : ι} (h : a ∈ m) :
f a * ((m.erase a).map f).prod = (m.map f).prod := by
rw [← m.coe_toList, coe_erase, map_coe, map_coe, prod_coe, prod_coe,
List.prod_map_erase f (mem_toList.2 h)]
#align multiset.prod_map_erase Multiset.prod_map_erase
#align multiset.sum_map_erase Multiset.sum_map_erase
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_singleton (a : α) : prod {a} = a := by
simp only [mul_one, prod_cons, ← cons_zero, eq_self_iff_true, prod_zero]
#align multiset.prod_singleton Multiset.prod_singleton
#align multiset.sum_singleton Multiset.sum_singleton
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Multiset.lean | 105 | 106 | theorem prod_pair (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Multiset α).prod = a * b := by |
rw [insert_eq_cons, prod_cons, prod_singleton]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
#align_import geometry.euclidean.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Perpendicular bisector of a segment
We define `AffineSubspace.perpBisector p₁ p₂` to be the perpendicular bisector of the segment
`[p₁, p₂]`, as a bundled affine subspace. We also prove that a point belongs to the perpendicular
bisector if and only if it is equidistant from `p₁` and `p₂`, as well as a few linear equations that
define this subspace.
## Keywords
euclidean geometry, perpendicular, perpendicular bisector, line segment bisector, equidistant
-/
open Set
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
noncomputable section
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {c c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- Perpendicular bisector of a segment in a Euclidean affine space. -/
def perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
.comap ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst ℝ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂)).symm : P →ᵃ[ℝ] V) <|
(LinearMap.ker (innerₛₗ ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁))).toAffineSubspace
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `p₂ -ᵥ p₁` is orthogonal to
`c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero' :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂` is
orthogonal to `p₂ -ᵥ p₁`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_eq_zero_symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_pointReflection_vsub_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪Equiv.pointReflection c p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, Equiv.pointReflection_apply,
vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add, real_inner_smul_left, vadd_vsub_assoc]
simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_pointReflection_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ (Equiv.pointReflection p₂ p₁) ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, midpoint_pointReflection_right,
Equiv.pointReflection_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, inner_add_right, add_self_eq_zero,
← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem midpoint_mem_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ := by
simp [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero]
theorem perpBisector_nonempty : (perpBisector p₁ p₂ : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨_, midpoint_mem_perpBisector _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem direction_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
(perpBisector p₁ p₂).direction = (ℝ ∙ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁))ᗮ := by
erw [perpBisector, comap_symm, map_direction, Submodule.map_id,
Submodule.toAffineSubspace_direction]
ext x
exact Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [Iff.comm, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← add_neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ← inner_add_left, vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add,
real_inner_smul_left]; simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = (dist p₁ p₂) ^ 2 / 2 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right _ _ p₁, inner_sub_left,
sub_eq_zero, midpoint_vsub_left, invOf_eq_inv, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,
dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq : c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ dist c p₁ = dist c p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff,
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left, inner_add_left, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← inner_neg_right,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner]
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq' : c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ dist p₁ c = dist p₂ c := by
simp only [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, dist_comm]
theorem perpBisector_comm (p₁ p₂ : P) : perpBisector p₁ p₂ = perpBisector p₂ p₁ := by
ext c; simp only [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem right_mem_perpBisector : p₂ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
simpa [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner] using eq_comm
@[simp] theorem left_mem_perpBisector : p₁ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [perpBisector_comm, right_mem_perpBisector, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem perpBisector_self (p : P) : perpBisector p p = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ ↦ by simp [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner]
@[simp] theorem perpBisector_eq_top : perpBisector p₁ p₂ = ⊤ ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h ▸ perpBisector_self _⟩
rw [← left_mem_perpBisector, h]
trivial
@[simp] theorem perpBisector_ne_bot : perpBisector p₁ p₂ ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [← nonempty_iff_ne_bot]; exact perpBisector_nonempty
end AffineSubspace
open AffineSubspace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-- Suppose that `c₁` is equidistant from `p₁` and `p₂`, and the same applies to `c₂`. Then the
vector between `c₁` and `c₂` is orthogonal to that between `p₁` and `p₂`. (In two dimensions, this
says that the diagonals of a kite are orthogonal.) -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/PerpBisector.lean | 129 | 132 | theorem inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq {c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ : P} (hc₁ : dist p₁ c₁ = dist p₂ c₁)
(hc₂ : dist p₁ c₂ = dist p₂ c₂) : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 := by |
rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left, ← direction_perpBisector]
apply vsub_mem_direction <;> rwa [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
#align real.le_rpow_add Real.le_rpow_add
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
#align real.rpow_sum_of_pos Real.rpow_sum_of_pos
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
#align real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg Real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg Real.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub Real.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub' Real.rpow_sub'
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
#align complex.of_real_cpow Complex.ofReal_cpow
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, abs.map_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg,
arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx), ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align complex.of_real_cpow_of_nonpos Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(abs x ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [abs.pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = (abs x) ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = (abs x) ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem abs_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, abs_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (abs.pos hz)]
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero Complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero
theorem abs_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact abs_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [map_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, map_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_imp Complex.abs_cpow_of_imp
theorem abs_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : abs (z ^ w) ≤ abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (abs_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align complex.abs_cpow_le Complex.abs_cpow_le
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
#align complex.abs_cpow_real Complex.abs_cpow_real
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← abs_cpow_real]; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
#align complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat Complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : abs (x ^ y) = x ^ y.re := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, abs_of_nonneg hx.le]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
abs (x ^ y) = x ^ re y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, _root_.abs_of_nonneg]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero (n : ℕ) {s : ℂ} (hs : s.re ≠ 0) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg hs]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) : 0 < ‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ :=
(norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn _).symm ▸ Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _
theorem cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (z : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ (↑y * z) = (↑(x ^ y) : ℂ) ^ z := by
rw [cpow_mul, ofReal_cpow hx]
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, neg_lt_zero]; exact Real.pi_pos
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]; exact Real.pi_pos.le
#align complex.cpow_mul_of_real_nonneg Complex.cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg
end Complex
/-! ### Positivity extension -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is positive (namely 1)
when the exponent is zero. The other cases are done in `evalRpow`. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (0 : ℝ)]
def evalRpowZero : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ (0 : ℝ)) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_zero_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is nonnegative when
the base is nonnegative and positive when the base is positive. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (_ : ℝ)]
def evalRpow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ ($b : ℝ)) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_pos_of_pos $pa $b))
| .nonnegative pa =>
pure (.nonnegative q(Real.rpow_nonneg $pa $b))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-!
## Further algebraic properties of `rpow`
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
rw [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_cpow (rpow_nonneg hx _),
Complex.ofReal_cpow hx, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.cpow_mul, Complex.ofReal_cpow hx] <;>
simp only [(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, (Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, Complex.ofReal_im,
neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
#align real.rpow_mul Real.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_add_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_def, rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_add,
Complex.cpow_add _ _ (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx), Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.cpow_intCast, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, mul_comm, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.rpow_add_int Real.rpow_add_int
theorem rpow_add_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_add_nat Real.rpow_add_nat
theorem rpow_sub_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y (-n)
#align real.rpow_sub_int Real.rpow_sub_int
theorem rpow_sub_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_sub_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_sub_nat Real.rpow_sub_nat
lemma rpow_add_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_add_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_sub_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_sub_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_natCast]
theorem rpow_add_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_add_one Real.rpow_add_one
theorem rpow_sub_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_sub_one Real.rpow_sub_one
lemma rpow_add_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_sub_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [← rpow_natCast]
simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat]
#align real.rpow_two Real.rpow_two
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹ by rwa [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one] at H
simp only [rpow_intCast, zpow_one, zpow_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg_one Real.rpow_neg_one
theorem mul_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
iterate 2 rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg]; split_ifs with h_ifs <;> simp_all
· rw [log_mul ‹_› ‹_›, add_mul, exp_add, rpow_def_of_pos (hy.lt_of_ne' ‹_›)]
all_goals positivity
#align real.mul_rpow Real.mul_rpow
theorem inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm]
#align real.inv_rpow Real.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
#align real.div_rpow Real.div_rpow
theorem log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x ^ y) = y * log x := by
apply exp_injective
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y]
#align real.log_rpow Real.log_rpow
theorem mul_log_eq_log_iff {x y z : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hz : 0 < z) :
y * log x = log z ↔ x ^ y = z :=
⟨fun h ↦ log_injOn_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hz <| log_rpow hx _ |>.trans h,
by rintro rfl; rw [log_rpow hx]⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
/-! Note: lemmas about `(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r)` such as `Real.finset_prod_rpow` are proved
in `Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean` instead. -/
/-!
## Order and monotonicity
-/
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z := by
rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hx; cases' hx with hx hx
· rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)]
exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa [← hx] at hxy) _
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow Real.rpow_lt_rpow
theorem strictMonoOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
StrictMonoOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow ha hab hr
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁'); · rfl
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with (rfl | h₂'); · simp
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
#align real.rpow_le_rpow Real.rpow_le_rpow
theorem monotoneOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
MonotoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow ha hab hr
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_lt_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_pos.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans_le hxy
rw [← inv_le_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_le_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_nonneg.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), fun h => rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_iff Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h ↦ rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx h hz.le,
fun h ↦ rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hy h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy hx hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx)
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx)
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg {x y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y < x) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z < y ^ z := by
have hx : 0 < x := hy.trans hxy
rw [← neg_neg z, Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) (-z), Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy) (-z),
inv_lt_inv (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _)]
exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow (by positivity) hxy <| neg_pos_of_neg hz
theorem strictAntiOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
StrictAntiOn (fun (x:ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg ha hab hr
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with hz_zero | rfl
case inl =>
rcases ne_or_eq x y with hxy' | rfl
case inl =>
exact le_of_lt <| rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg hy (Ne.lt_of_le (id (Ne.symm hxy')) hxy)
(Ne.lt_of_le hz_zero hz)
case inr => simp
case inr => simp
theorem antitoneOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_nonpos {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) :
AntitoneOn (fun (x:ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos ha hab hr
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ y ≤ z := by
have x_pos : 0 < x := lt_trans zero_lt_one hx
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos y) (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos z), log_rpow x_pos,
log_rpow x_pos, mul_le_mul_right (log_pos hx)]
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ y < z := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hx, lt_iff_not_le]
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff Real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1)
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1)
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 681 | 684 | theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ z ≤ y := by |
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 y) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 z), log_rpow hx0, log_rpow hx0,
mul_le_mul_right_of_neg (log_neg hx0 hx1)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 98 | 110 | theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by |
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Unique
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
/-!
# Sheafification
Given a site `(C, J)` we define a typeclass `HasSheafify J A` saying that the inclusion functor from
`A`-valued sheaves on `C` to presheaves admits a left exact left adjoint (sheafification).
Note: to access the `HasSheafify` instance for suitable concrete categories, import the file
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.LeftExact`.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable (A : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} A]
/--
A proposition saying that the inclusion functor from sheaves to presheaves admits a left adjoint.
-/
abbrev HasWeakSheafify : Prop := (sheafToPresheaf J A).IsRightAdjoint
/--
`HasSheafify` means that the inclusion functor from sheaves to presheaves admits a left exact
left adjiont (sheafification).
Given a finite limit preserving functor `F : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A` and an adjunction
`adj : F ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A`, use `HasSheafify.mk'` to construct a `HasSheafify` instance.
-/
class HasSheafify : Prop where
isRightAdjoint : HasWeakSheafify J A
isLeftExact : Nonempty (PreservesFiniteLimits ((sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint))
instance [HasSheafify J A] : HasWeakSheafify J A := HasSheafify.isRightAdjoint
noncomputable section
instance [HasSheafify J A] : PreservesFiniteLimits ((sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint) :=
HasSheafify.isLeftExact.some
theorem HasSheafify.mk' {F : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A} (adj : F ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A)
[PreservesFiniteLimits F] : HasSheafify J A where
isRightAdjoint := ⟨F, ⟨adj⟩⟩
isLeftExact := ⟨by
have : (sheafToPresheaf J A).IsRightAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨adj⟩⟩
exact ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ preservesLimitsOfShapeOfNatIso
(adj.leftAdjointUniq (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint (sheafToPresheaf J A)))⟩⟩
/-- The sheafification functor, left adjoint to the inclusion. -/
def presheafToSheaf [HasWeakSheafify J A] : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A :=
(sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint
instance [HasSheafify J A] : PreservesFiniteLimits (presheafToSheaf J A) :=
HasSheafify.isLeftExact.some
/-- The sheafification-inclusion adjunction. -/
def sheafificationAdjunction [HasWeakSheafify J A] :
presheafToSheaf J A ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A := Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint _
instance [HasWeakSheafify J A] : (presheafToSheaf J A).IsLeftAdjoint :=
⟨_, ⟨sheafificationAdjunction J A⟩⟩
end
variable {D : Type*} [Category D] [HasWeakSheafify J D]
/-- The sheafification of a presheaf `P`. -/
noncomputable abbrev sheafify (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D :=
presheafToSheaf J D |>.obj P |>.val
/-- The canonical map from `P` to its sheafification. -/
noncomputable abbrev toSheafify (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : P ⟶ sheafify J P :=
sheafificationAdjunction J D |>.unit.app P
@[simp]
theorem sheafificationAdjunction_unit_app (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
(sheafificationAdjunction J D).unit.app P = toSheafify J P := rfl
/-- The canonical map on sheafifications induced by a morphism. -/
noncomputable abbrev sheafifyMap {P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) : sheafify J P ⟶ sheafify J Q :=
presheafToSheaf J D |>.map η |>.val
@[simp]
theorem sheafifyMap_id (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : sheafifyMap J (𝟙 P) = 𝟙 (sheafify J P) := by
simp [sheafifyMap, sheafify]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheafification.lean | 100 | 102 | theorem sheafifyMap_comp {P Q R : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) (γ : Q ⟶ R) :
sheafifyMap J (η ≫ γ) = sheafifyMap J η ≫ sheafifyMap J γ := by |
simp [sheafifyMap, sheafify]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_neg
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.oangle_neg_self_left
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.oangle_neg_self_right
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, add_left_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_self]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_same_ray_neg Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, _root_.abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq Orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
convert Complex.arg_real_mul _ (_ : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2) using 2
· norm_cast
· have : 0 < ‖y‖ := by simpa using hy
positivity
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
#align orientation.oangle_add Orientation.oangle_add
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_swap Orientation.oangle_add_swap
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left Orientation.oangle_sub_left
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right Orientation.oangle_sub_right
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3 Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq Orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
#align orientation.oangle_map Orientation.oangle_map
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by simp [oangle]
#align complex.oangle Complex.oangle
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align orientation.oangle_map_complex Orientation.oangle_map_complex
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg
/-- The inner product of two vectors is the product of the norms and the cosine of the oriented
angle between the vectors. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle (x y : V) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hx
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
rw [oangle, Real.Angle.cos_coe, Complex.cos_arg, o.abs_kahler]
· simp only [kahler_apply_apply, real_smul, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, ofReal_im]
field_simp
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle Orientation.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the inner product divided by
the product of the norms. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
rw [o.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle]
field_simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx, norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm Orientation.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors equals that of the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = Real.cos (InnerProductGeometry.angle x y) := by
rw [o.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm hx hy, InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle Orientation.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is plus or minus the unoriented angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y ∨
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y :=
Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.1 <| o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle Orientation.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle
/-- The unoriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the absolute value of the oriented angle,
converted to a real. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = |(o.oangle x y).toReal| := by
have h0 := InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg x y
have hpi := InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi x y
rcases o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy with (h | h)
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
#align orientation.angle_eq_abs_oangle_to_real Orientation.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle between two vectors is zero, either one of the vectors is
zero or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V}
(h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 0) :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h) <;> simp [h, Real.pi_pos.le]
#align orientation.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V}
(h : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z)
(hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) : o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
by_cases h0 : (w = 0 ∨ x = 0) ∨ y = 0 ∨ z = 0
· have hs' : (o.oangle w x).sign = 0 ∧ (o.oangle y z).sign = 0 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs
· simpa using hs
rcases hs' with ⟨hswx, hsyz⟩
have h' : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = π / 2 ∧ InnerProductGeometry.angle y z = π / 2 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h
· simpa using h
rcases h' with ⟨hwx, hyz⟩
have hpi : π / 2 ≠ π := by
intro hpi
rw [div_eq_iff, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, mul_two, add_sub_cancel_right] at hpi
· exact Real.pi_pos.ne.symm hpi
· exact two_ne_zero
have h0wx : w = 0 ∨ x = 0 := by
have h0' := o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero hswx
simpa [hwx, Real.pi_pos.ne.symm, hpi] using h0'
have h0yz : y = 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
have h0' := o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero hsyz
simpa [hyz, Real.pi_pos.ne.symm, hpi] using h0'
rcases h0wx with (h0wx | h0wx) <;> rcases h0yz with (h0yz | h0yz) <;> simp [h0wx, h0yz]
· push_neg at h0
rw [Real.Angle.eq_iff_abs_toReal_eq_of_sign_eq hs]
rwa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal h0.1.1 h0.1.2,
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal h0.2.1 h0.2.2] at h
#align orientation.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq Orientation.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq
/-- If the signs of two oriented angles between nonzero vectors are equal, the oriented angles are
equal if and only if the unoriented angles are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V} (hw : w ≠ 0) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
(hz : z ≠ 0) (hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z ↔
o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hw hx, o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hy hz, h]
#align orientation.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq Orientation.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors equals the unoriented angle if the sign is positive. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · exfalso; simp [hx] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · exfalso; simp [hy] at h
refine (o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy).resolve_right ?_
intro hxy
rw [hxy, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← SignType.neg_iff, ← not_le] at h
exact h (Real.Angle.sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg _ _)
(InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi _ _))
#align orientation.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one Orientation.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors equals minus the unoriented angle if the sign is
negative. -/
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) :
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · exfalso; simp [hx] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · exfalso; simp [hy] at h
refine (o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy).resolve_left ?_
intro hxy
rw [hxy, ← SignType.neg_iff, ← not_le] at h
exact h (Real.Angle.sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg _ _)
(InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi _ _))
#align orientation.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is zero if and only if the unoriented angle
is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
· have ha := o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy
rw [h] at ha
simpa using ha
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the unoriented angle is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_eq_self₀, not_or,
Real.pi_ne_zero]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_eq_self₀, not_or,
Real.pi_ne_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy, h]
simp [Real.pi_pos.le]
· have ha := o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy
rw [h] at ha
simpa using ha
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
/-- One of two vectors is zero or the oriented angle between them is plus or minus `π / 2` if
and only if the inner product of those vectors is zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, or_iff_right hx, or_iff_right hy]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rwa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
· convert o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy using 2 <;> rw [h]
simp only [neg_div, Real.Angle.coe_neg]
#align orientation.eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero Orientation.eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
is zero. -/
theorem inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 0 :=
o.eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero.1 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl h
#align orientation.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
(reversed) is zero. -/
theorem inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [real_inner_comm, o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h]
#align orientation.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
is zero. -/
theorem inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 0 :=
o.eq_zero_or_oangle_eq_iff_inner_eq_zero.1 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
#align orientation.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the oriented angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the inner product of those vectors
(reversed) is zero. -/
theorem inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [real_inner_comm, o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h]
#align orientation.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` negates the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_neg_left (x y : V) : (o.oangle (-x) y).sign = -(o.oangle x y).sign := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, Real.Angle.sign_add_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_neg_left Orientation.oangle_sign_neg_left
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` negates the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_neg_right (x y : V) : (o.oangle x (-y)).sign = -(o.oangle x y).sign := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, Real.Angle.sign_add_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_neg_right Orientation.oangle_sign_neg_right
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a real multiplies the sign of the angle by
the sign of the real. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_smul_left (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle (r • x) y).sign = SignType.sign r * (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (h | h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_smul_left Orientation.oangle_sign_smul_left
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a real multiplies the sign of the angle by
the sign of the real. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_smul_right (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle x (r • y)).sign = SignType.sign r * (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (h | h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_smul_right Orientation.oangle_sign_smul_right
/-- Auxiliary lemma for the proof of `oangle_sign_smul_add_right`; not intended to be used
outside of that proof. -/
theorem oangle_smul_add_right_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff {x y : V} (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle x (r • x + y) = 0 ∨ o.oangle x (r • x + y) = π ↔
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π := by
simp_rw [oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent, Fintype.not_linearIndependent_iff]
-- Porting note: at this point all occurences of the bound variable `i` are of type
-- `Fin (Nat.succ (Nat.succ 0))`, but `Fin.sum_univ_two` and `Fin.exists_fin_two` expect it to be
-- `Fin 2` instead. Hence all the `conv`s.
-- Was `simp_rw [Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.exists_fin_two]`
conv_lhs => enter [1, g, 1, 1, 2, i]; tactic => change Fin 2 at i
conv_lhs => enter [1, g]; rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
conv_rhs => enter [1, g, 1, 1, 2, i]; tactic => change Fin 2 at i
conv_rhs => enter [1, g]; rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
conv_lhs => enter [1, g, 2, 1, i]; tactic => change Fin 2 at i
conv_lhs => enter [1, g]; rw [Fin.exists_fin_two]
conv_rhs => enter [1, g, 2, 1, i]; tactic => change Fin 2 at i
conv_rhs => enter [1, g]; rw [Fin.exists_fin_two]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨m, h, hm⟩
change m 0 • x + m 1 • (r • x + y) = 0 at h
refine ⟨![m 0 + m 1 * r, m 1], ?_⟩
change (m 0 + m 1 * r) • x + m 1 • y = 0 ∧ (m 0 + m 1 * r ≠ 0 ∨ m 1 ≠ 0)
rw [smul_add, smul_smul, ← add_assoc, ← add_smul] at h
refine ⟨h, not_and_or.1 fun h0 => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨h0, h1⟩ := h0
rw [h1] at h0 hm
rw [zero_mul, add_zero] at h0
simp [h0] at hm
· rcases h with ⟨m, h, hm⟩
change m 0 • x + m 1 • y = 0 at h
refine ⟨![m 0 - m 1 * r, m 1], ?_⟩
change (m 0 - m 1 * r) • x + m 1 • (r • x + y) = 0 ∧ (m 0 - m 1 * r ≠ 0 ∨ m 1 ≠ 0)
rw [sub_smul, smul_add, smul_smul, ← add_assoc, sub_add_cancel]
refine ⟨h, not_and_or.1 fun h0 => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨h0, h1⟩ := h0
rw [h1] at h0 hm
rw [zero_mul, sub_zero] at h0
simp [h0] at hm
#align orientation.oangle_smul_add_right_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff Orientation.oangle_smul_add_right_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff
/-- Adding a multiple of the first vector passed to `oangle` to the second vector does not change
the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_smul_add_right (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle x (r • x + y)).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
by_cases h : o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π
· rwa [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff.2 h, Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff,
oangle_smul_add_right_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff]
have h' : ∀ r' : ℝ, o.oangle x (r' • x + y) ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x (r' • x + y) ≠ π := by
intro r'
rwa [← o.oangle_smul_add_right_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff r', not_or] at h
let s : Set (V × V) := (fun r' : ℝ => (x, r' • x + y)) '' Set.univ
have hc : IsConnected s := isConnected_univ.image _ (continuous_const.prod_mk
((continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const)).continuousOn
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun z : V × V => o.oangle z.1 z.2) s := by
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun z hz => o.continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image] at hz
obtain ⟨r', -, rfl⟩ := hz
simp only [Prod.fst, Prod.snd]
intro hz
· simpa [hz] using (h' 0).1
· simpa [hz] using (h' r').1
have hs : ∀ z : V × V, z ∈ s → o.oangle z.1 z.2 ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle z.1 z.2 ≠ π := by
intro z hz
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image] at hz
obtain ⟨r', -, rfl⟩ := hz
exact h' r'
have hx : (x, y) ∈ s := by
convert Set.mem_image_of_mem (fun r' : ℝ => (x, r' • x + y)) (Set.mem_univ 0)
simp
have hy : (x, r • x + y) ∈ s := Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (Set.mem_univ _)
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hc hf hs hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_sign_smul_add_right Orientation.oangle_sign_smul_add_right
/-- Adding a multiple of the second vector passed to `oangle` to the first vector does not change
the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_add_smul_left (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle (x + r • y) y).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
simp_rw [o.oangle_rev y, Real.Angle.sign_neg, add_comm x, oangle_sign_smul_add_right]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_add_smul_left Orientation.oangle_sign_add_smul_left
/-- Subtracting a multiple of the first vector passed to `oangle` from the second vector does
not change the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_sub_smul_right (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle x (y - r • x)).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, add_comm, oangle_sign_smul_add_right]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_smul_right Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_smul_right
/-- Subtracting a multiple of the second vector passed to `oangle` from the first vector does
not change the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_sub_smul_left (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle (x - r • y) y).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, oangle_sign_add_smul_left]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_smul_left Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_smul_left
/-- Adding the first vector passed to `oangle` to the second vector does not change the sign of
the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_add_right (x y : V) : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← o.oangle_sign_smul_add_right x y 1, one_smul]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_add_right Orientation.oangle_sign_add_right
/-- Adding the second vector passed to `oangle` to the first vector does not change the sign of
the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_add_left (x y : V) : (o.oangle (x + y) y).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← o.oangle_sign_add_smul_left x y 1, one_smul]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_add_left Orientation.oangle_sign_add_left
/-- Subtracting the first vector passed to `oangle` from the second vector does not change the
sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_sub_right (x y : V) : (o.oangle x (y - x)).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← o.oangle_sign_sub_smul_right x y 1, one_smul]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_right Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_right
/-- Subtracting the second vector passed to `oangle` from the first vector does not change the
sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_sub_left (x y : V) : (o.oangle (x - y) y).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← o.oangle_sign_sub_smul_left x y 1, one_smul]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_left Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_left
/-- Subtracting the second vector passed to `oangle` from a multiple of the first vector negates
the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_smul_sub_right (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle x (r • x - y)).sign = -(o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← oangle_sign_neg_right, sub_eq_add_neg, oangle_sign_smul_add_right]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_smul_sub_right Orientation.oangle_sign_smul_sub_right
/-- Subtracting the first vector passed to `oangle` from a multiple of the second vector negates
the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_smul_sub_left (x y : V) (r : ℝ) :
(o.oangle (r • y - x) y).sign = -(o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← oangle_sign_neg_left, sub_eq_neg_add, oangle_sign_add_smul_left]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_smul_sub_left Orientation.oangle_sign_smul_sub_left
/-- Subtracting the second vector passed to `oangle` from the first vector negates the sign of
the angle. -/
theorem oangle_sign_sub_right_eq_neg (x y : V) :
(o.oangle x (x - y)).sign = -(o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← o.oangle_sign_smul_sub_right x y 1, one_smul]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_right_eq_neg Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_right_eq_neg
/-- Subtracting the first vector passed to `oangle` from the second vector negates the sign of
the angle. -/
theorem oangle_sign_sub_left_eq_neg (x y : V) :
(o.oangle (y - x) y).sign = -(o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← o.oangle_sign_smul_sub_left x y 1, one_smul]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_left_eq_neg Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_left_eq_neg
/-- Subtracting the first vector passed to `oangle` from the second vector then swapping the
vectors does not change the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_sub_right_swap (x y : V) : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_eq_neg, o.oangle_rev y x, Real.Angle.sign_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_right_swap Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_right_swap
/-- Subtracting the second vector passed to `oangle` from the first vector then swapping the
vectors does not change the sign of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sign_sub_left_swap (x y : V) : (o.oangle (x - y) x).sign = (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_left_eq_neg, o.oangle_rev y x, Real.Angle.sign_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_sign_sub_left_swap Orientation.oangle_sign_sub_left_swap
/-- The sign of the angle between a vector, and a linear combination of that vector with a second
vector, is the sign of the factor by which the second vector is multiplied in that combination
multiplied by the sign of the angle between the two vectors. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right (x y : V) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
(o.oangle x (r₁ • x + r₂ • y)).sign = SignType.sign r₂ * (o.oangle x y).sign := by
rw [← o.oangle_sign_smul_add_right x (r₁ • x + r₂ • y) (-r₁)]
simp
#align orientation.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right Orientation.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right
/-- The sign of the angle between a linear combination of two vectors and the second vector is
the sign of the factor by which the first vector is multiplied in that combination multiplied by
the sign of the angle between the two vectors. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 1,039 | 1,042 | theorem oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_left (x y : V) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
(o.oangle (r₁ • x + r₂ • y) y).sign = SignType.sign r₁ * (o.oangle x y).sign := by |
simp_rw [o.oangle_rev y, Real.Angle.sign_neg, add_comm (r₁ • x), oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right,
mul_neg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.LIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Marginal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
#align_import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Lebesgue measure on the real line and on `ℝⁿ`
We show that the Lebesgue measure on the real line (constructed as a particular case of additive
Haar measure on inner product spaces) coincides with the Stieltjes measure associated
to the function `x ↦ x`. We deduce properties of this measure on `ℝ`, and then of the product
Lebesgue measure on `ℝⁿ`. In particular, we prove that they are translation invariant.
We show that, on `ℝⁿ`, a linear map acts on Lebesgue measure by rescaling it through the absolute
value of its determinant, in `Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi`.
More properties of the Lebesgue measure are deduced from this in
`Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean`, where they are proved more generally for any
additive Haar measure on a finite-dimensional real vector space.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal (ofReal)
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
/-!
### Definition of the Lebesgue measure and lengths of intervals
-/
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
/-- The volume on the real line (as a particular case of the volume on a finite-dimensional
inner product space) coincides with the Stieltjes measure coming from the identity function. -/
theorem volume_eq_stieltjes_id : (volume : Measure ℝ) = StieltjesFunction.id.measure := by
haveI : IsAddLeftInvariant StieltjesFunction.id.measure :=
⟨fun a =>
Eq.symm <|
Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => by
simp only [Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_add a) measurableSet_Ioo,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioo, StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim,
StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, preimage_const_add_Ioo]⟩
have A : StieltjesFunction.id.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 := by
change StieltjesFunction.id.measure (parallelepiped (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ)) = 1
rcases parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ) with (H | H) <;>
simp only [H, StieltjesFunction.measure_Icc, StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, tsub_zero,
StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique StieltjesFunction.id.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped, A]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar, one_smul]
#align real.volume_eq_stieltjes_id Real.volume_eq_stieltjes_id
theorem volume_val (s) : volume s = StieltjesFunction.id.measure s := by
simp [volume_eq_stieltjes_id]
#align real.volume_val Real.volume_val
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ico a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Ico Real.volume_Ico
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Icc Real.volume_Icc
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioo a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Ioo Real.volume_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Ioc Real.volume_Ioc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem volume_singleton {a : ℝ} : volume ({a} : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_singleton Real.volume_singleton
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this, after mathlib4#4628
theorem volume_univ : volume (univ : Set ℝ) = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r =>
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Icc (0 : ℝ) r) := by simp
_ ≤ volume univ := measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align real.volume_univ Real.volume_univ
@[simp]
theorem volume_ball (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.ball a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [ball_eq_Ioo, volume_Ioo, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
#align real.volume_ball Real.volume_ball
@[simp]
theorem volume_closedBall (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc, volume_Icc, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
#align real.volume_closed_ball Real.volume_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_ball (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [Metric.emetric_ball_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal, volume_ball, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
#align real.volume_emetric_ball Real.volume_emetric_ball
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_closedBall (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [EMetric.closedBall_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal, volume_closedBall, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
#align real.volume_emetric_closed_ball Real.volume_emetric_closedBall
instance noAtoms_volume : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun _ => volume_singleton⟩
#align real.has_no_atoms_volume Real.noAtoms_volume
@[simp]
theorem volume_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume (uIcc a b) = ofReal |b - a| := by
rw [← Icc_min_max, volume_Icc, max_sub_min_eq_abs]
#align real.volume_interval Real.volume_interval
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioi {a : ℝ} : volume (Ioi a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo a (a + n)) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Ioi a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
#align real.volume_Ioi Real.volume_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ici {a : ℝ} : volume (Ici a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Ioi_ae_eq_Ici]; simp
#align real.volume_Ici Real.volume_Ici
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iio {a : ℝ} : volume (Iio a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo (a - n) a) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Iio a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self
#align real.volume_Iio Real.volume_Iio
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iic {a : ℝ} : volume (Iic a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Iio_ae_eq_Iic]; simp
#align real.volume_Iic Real.volume_Iic
instance locallyFinite_volume : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun x =>
⟨Ioo (x - 1) (x + 1),
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioo ⟨sub_lt_self _ zero_lt_one, lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one⟩, by
simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top]⟩⟩
#align real.locally_finite_volume Real.locallyFinite_volume
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Icc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Icc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Icc Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Icc
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ico (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ico x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Ico Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ico
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Ioc Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioc
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioo (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioo x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Ioo Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioo
theorem volume_le_diam (s : Set ℝ) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s := by
by_cases hs : Bornology.IsBounded s
· rw [Real.ediam_eq hs, ← volume_Icc]
exact volume.mono hs.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup
· rw [Metric.ediam_of_unbounded hs]; exact le_top
#align real.volume_le_diam Real.volume_le_diam
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real {p : ℝ → Prop} {a : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < volume { x | p x } := by
rcases h.exists_Ioo_subset with ⟨l, u, hx, hs⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono hs)
simpa [-mem_Ioo] using hx.1.trans hx.2
#align filter.eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real Filter.Eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real
/-!
### Volume of a box in `ℝⁿ`
-/
theorem volume_Icc_pi {a b : ι → ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc, volume_pi_pi]
simp only [Real.volume_Icc]
#align real.volume_Icc_pi Real.volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc_pi_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (Icc a b)).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_Icc_pi, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_Icc_pi_to_real Real.volume_Icc_pi_toReal
theorem volume_pi_Ioo {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
#align real.volume_pi_Ioo Real.volume_pi_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioo, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_pi_Ioo_to_real Real.volume_pi_Ioo_toReal
theorem volume_pi_Ioc {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
#align real.volume_pi_Ioc Real.volume_pi_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioc, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_pi_Ioc_to_real Real.volume_pi_Ioc_toReal
theorem volume_pi_Ico {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
#align real.volume_pi_Ico Real.volume_pi_Ico
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ico_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ico, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_pi_Ico_to_real Real.volume_pi_Ico_toReal
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_ball (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
volume (Metric.ball a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_ball a hr, volume_ball, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr.le) _).symm
#align real.volume_pi_ball Real.volume_pi_ball
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_closedBall (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_closedBall a hr, volume_closedBall, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr) _).symm
#align real.volume_pi_closed_ball Real.volume_pi_closedBall
theorem volume_pi_le_prod_diam (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) :
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
calc
volume s ≤ volume (pi univ fun i => closure (Function.eval i '' s)) :=
volume.mono <|
Subset.trans (subset_pi_eval_image univ s) <| pi_mono fun _ _ => subset_closure
_ = ∏ i, volume (closure <| Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_pi _
_ ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => (volume_le_diam _).trans_eq (EMetric.diam_closure _)
#align real.volume_pi_le_prod_diam Real.volume_pi_le_prod_diam
theorem volume_pi_le_diam_pow (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι :=
calc
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_le_prod_diam s
_ ≤ ∏ _i : ι, (1 : ℝ≥0) * EMetric.diam s :=
(Finset.prod_le_prod' fun i _ => (LipschitzWith.eval i).ediam_image_le s)
_ = EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι := by
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, Finset.prod_const, Fintype.card]
#align real.volume_pi_le_diam_pow Real.volume_pi_le_diam_pow
/-!
### Images of the Lebesgue measure under multiplication in ℝ
-/
theorem smul_map_volume_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
ENNReal.ofReal |a| • Measure.map (a * ·) volume = volume := by
refine (Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => ?_).symm
cases' lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h h
· simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, Measure.smul_apply, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (le_of_lt <| neg_pos.2 h),
Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_mul a) measurableSet_Ioo, neg_sub_neg, neg_mul,
preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg _ _ h, abs_of_neg h, mul_sub, smul_eq_mul,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_lt h)]
· simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, Measure.smul_apply, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (le_of_lt h),
Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_mul a) measurableSet_Ioo, preimage_const_mul_Ioo _ _ h,
abs_of_pos h, mul_sub, mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt h), smul_eq_mul]
#align real.smul_map_volume_mul_left Real.smul_map_volume_mul_left
theorem map_volume_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (a * ·) volume = ENNReal.ofReal |a⁻¹| • volume := by
conv_rhs =>
rw [← Real.smul_map_volume_mul_left h, smul_smul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ←
abs_mul, inv_mul_cancel h, abs_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_smul]
#align real.map_volume_mul_left Real.map_volume_mul_left
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
volume ((a * ·) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s :=
calc
volume ((a * ·) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (a * ·) volume s :=
((Homeomorph.mulLeft₀ a h).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s := by rw [map_volume_mul_left h]; rfl
#align real.volume_preimage_mul_left Real.volume_preimage_mul_left
theorem smul_map_volume_mul_right {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
ENNReal.ofReal |a| • Measure.map (· * a) volume = volume := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.smul_map_volume_mul_left h
#align real.smul_map_volume_mul_right Real.smul_map_volume_mul_right
theorem map_volume_mul_right {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (· * a) volume = ENNReal.ofReal |a⁻¹| • volume := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.map_volume_mul_left h
#align real.map_volume_mul_right Real.map_volume_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_mul_right {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
volume ((· * a) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s :=
calc
volume ((· * a) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (· * a) volume s :=
((Homeomorph.mulRight₀ a h).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s := by rw [map_volume_mul_right h]; rfl
#align real.volume_preimage_mul_right Real.volume_preimage_mul_right
/-!
### Images of the Lebesgue measure under translation/linear maps in ℝⁿ
-/
open Matrix
/-- A diagonal matrix rescales Lebesgue according to its determinant. This is a special case of
`Real.map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi`, that one should use instead (and whose proof
uses this particular case). -/
theorem smul_map_diagonal_volume_pi [DecidableEq ι] {D : ι → ℝ} (h : det (diagonal D) ≠ 0) :
ENNReal.ofReal (abs (det (diagonal D))) • Measure.map (toLin' (diagonal D)) volume =
volume := by
refine (Measure.pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm
simp only [det_diagonal, Measure.coe_smul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Pi.smul_apply]
rw [Measure.map_apply _ (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs)]
swap; · exact Continuous.measurable (LinearMap.continuous_on_pi _)
have :
(Matrix.toLin' (diagonal D) ⁻¹' Set.pi Set.univ fun i : ι => s i) =
Set.pi Set.univ fun i : ι => (D i * ·) ⁻¹' s i := by
ext f
simp only [LinearMap.coe_proj, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, LinearMap.smul_apply, mem_univ_pi,
mem_preimage, LinearMap.pi_apply, diagonal_toLin']
have B : ∀ i, ofReal (abs (D i)) * volume ((D i * ·) ⁻¹' s i) = volume (s i) := by
intro i
have A : D i ≠ 0 := by
simp only [det_diagonal, Ne] at h
exact Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.1 h i (Finset.mem_univ i)
rw [volume_preimage_mul_left A, ← mul_assoc, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← abs_mul,
mul_inv_cancel A, abs_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_mul]
rw [this, volume_pi_pi, Finset.abs_prod,
ENNReal.ofReal_prod_of_nonneg fun i _ => abs_nonneg (D i), ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
simp only [B]
#align real.smul_map_diagonal_volume_pi Real.smul_map_diagonal_volume_pi
/-- A transvection preserves Lebesgue measure. -/
theorem volume_preserving_transvectionStruct [DecidableEq ι] (t : TransvectionStruct ι ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (toLin' t.toMatrix) := by
/- We use `lmarginal` to conveniently use Fubini's theorem.
Along the coordinate where there is a shearing, it acts like a
translation, and therefore preserves Lebesgue. -/
have ht : Measurable (toLin' t.toMatrix) :=
(toLin' t.toMatrix).continuous_of_finiteDimensional.measurable
refine ⟨ht, ?_⟩
refine (pi_eq fun s hs ↦ ?_).symm
have h2s : MeasurableSet (univ.pi s) := .pi countable_univ fun i _ ↦ hs i
simp_rw [← pi_pi, ← lintegral_indicator_one h2s]
rw [lintegral_map (measurable_one.indicator h2s) ht, volume_pi]
refine lintegral_eq_of_lmarginal_eq {t.i} ((measurable_one.indicator h2s).comp ht)
(measurable_one.indicator h2s) ?_
simp_rw [lmarginal_singleton]
ext x
cases t with | mk t_i t_j t_hij t_c =>
simp [transvection, mulVec_stdBasisMatrix, t_hij.symm, ← Function.update_add,
lintegral_add_right_eq_self fun xᵢ ↦ indicator (univ.pi s) 1 (Function.update x t_i xᵢ)]
#align real.volume_preserving_transvection_struct Real.volume_preserving_transvectionStruct
/-- Any invertible matrix rescales Lebesgue measure through the absolute value of its
determinant. -/
theorem map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi [DecidableEq ι] {M : Matrix ι ι ℝ} (hM : det M ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (toLin' M) volume = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (det M)⁻¹) • volume := by
-- This follows from the cases we have already proved, of diagonal matrices and transvections,
-- as these matrices generate all invertible matrices.
apply diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero _ M hM
· intro D hD
conv_rhs => rw [← smul_map_diagonal_volume_pi hD]
rw [smul_smul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← abs_mul, inv_mul_cancel hD, abs_one,
ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_smul]
· intro t
simp_rw [Matrix.TransvectionStruct.det, _root_.inv_one, abs_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_smul,
(volume_preserving_transvectionStruct _).map_eq]
· intro A B _ _ IHA IHB
rw [toLin'_mul, det_mul, LinearMap.coe_comp, ← Measure.map_map, IHB, Measure.map_smul, IHA,
smul_smul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← abs_mul, mul_comm, mul_inv]
· apply Continuous.measurable
apply LinearMap.continuous_on_pi
· apply Continuous.measurable
apply LinearMap.continuous_on_pi
#align real.map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi Real.map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi
/-- Any invertible linear map rescales Lebesgue measure through the absolute value of its
determinant. -/
theorem map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) : Measure.map f volume =
ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • volume := by
classical
-- this is deduced from the matrix case
let M := LinearMap.toMatrix' f
have A : LinearMap.det f = det M := by simp only [M, LinearMap.det_toMatrix']
have B : f = toLin' M := by simp only [M, toLin'_toMatrix']
rw [A, B]
apply map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi
rwa [A] at hf
#align real.map_linear_map_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi
end Real
section regionBetween
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The region between two real-valued functions on an arbitrary set. -/
def regionBetween (f g : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) : Set (α × ℝ) :=
{ p : α × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ Ioo (f p.1) (g p.1) }
#align region_between regionBetween
theorem regionBetween_subset (f g : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) : regionBetween f g s ⊆ s ×ˢ univ := by
simpa only [prod_univ, regionBetween, Set.preimage, setOf_subset_setOf] using fun a => And.left
#align region_between_subset regionBetween_subset
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_regionBetween (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet (regionBetween f g s) := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_lt (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_lt measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
#align measurable_set_region_between measurableSet_regionBetween
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable;
a version for the region together with the graph of the upper function. -/
theorem measurableSet_region_between_oc (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.fst ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Ioc (f p.fst) (g p.fst) } := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Ioc, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_lt (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_le measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
#align measurable_set_region_between_oc measurableSet_region_between_oc
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable;
a version for the region together with the graph of the lower function. -/
theorem measurableSet_region_between_co (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.fst ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Ico (f p.fst) (g p.fst) } := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Ico, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_le (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_lt measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
#align measurable_set_region_between_co measurableSet_region_between_co
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable;
a version for the region together with the graphs of both functions. -/
theorem measurableSet_region_between_cc (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.fst ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Icc (f p.fst) (g p.fst) } := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Icc, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_le (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_le measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
#align measurable_set_region_between_cc measurableSet_region_between_cc
/-- The graph of a measurable function is a measurable set. -/
theorem measurableSet_graph (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.snd = f p.fst } := by
simpa using measurableSet_region_between_cc hf hf MeasurableSet.univ
#align measurable_set_graph measurableSet_graph
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/Basic.lean | 511 | 528 | theorem volume_regionBetween_eq_lintegral' (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod volume (regionBetween f g s) = ∫⁻ y in s, ENNReal.ofReal ((g - f) y) ∂μ := by |
classical
rw [Measure.prod_apply]
· have h :
(fun x => volume { a | x ∈ s ∧ a ∈ Ioo (f x) (g x) }) =
s.indicator fun x => ENNReal.ofReal (g x - f x) := by
funext x
rw [indicator_apply]
split_ifs with h
· have hx : { a | x ∈ s ∧ a ∈ Ioo (f x) (g x) } = Ioo (f x) (g x) := by simp [h, Ioo]
simp only [hx, Real.volume_Ioo, sub_zero]
· have hx : { a | x ∈ s ∧ a ∈ Ioo (f x) (g x) } = ∅ := by simp [h]
simp only [hx, measure_empty]
dsimp only [regionBetween, preimage_setOf_eq]
rw [h, lintegral_indicator] <;> simp only [hs, Pi.sub_apply]
· exact measurableSet_regionBetween hf hg hs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
#align_import logic.equiv.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cd391184c85986113f8c00844cfe6dda1d34be3d"
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we continue the work on equivalences begun in `Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean`, defining
* canonical isomorphisms between various types: e.g.,
- `Equiv.sumEquivSigmaBool` is the canonical equivalence between the sum of two types `α ⊕ β`
and the sigma-type `Σ b : Bool, b.casesOn α β`;
- `Equiv.prodSumDistrib : α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ)` shows that type product and type sum
satisfy the distributive law up to a canonical equivalence;
* operations on equivalences: e.g.,
- `Equiv.prodCongr ea eb : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`: combine two equivalences `ea : α₁ ≃ α₂` and
`eb : β₁ ≃ β₂` using `Prod.map`.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Data/Equiv/TransferInstance.lean` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u
open Function
namespace Equiv
/-- `PProd α β` is equivalent to `α × β` -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def pprodEquivProd : PProd α β ≃ α × β where
toFun x := (x.1, x.2)
invFun x := ⟨x.1, x.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod Equiv.pprodEquivProd
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProd_apply
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProd_symm_apply
/-- Product of two equivalences, in terms of `PProd`. If `α ≃ β` and `γ ≃ δ`, then
`PProd α γ ≃ PProd β δ`. -/
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 this had `@[congr]`
@[simps apply]
def pprodCongr (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : γ ≃ δ) : PProd α γ ≃ PProd β δ where
toFun x := ⟨e₁ x.1, e₂ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨e₁.symm x.1, e₂.symm x.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp
#align equiv.pprod_congr Equiv.pprodCongr
#align equiv.pprod_congr_apply Equiv.pprodCongr_apply
/-- Combine two equivalences using `PProd` in the domain and `Prod` in the codomain. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def pprodProd (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
PProd α₁ β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
(ea.pprodCongr eb).trans pprodEquivProd
#align equiv.pprod_prod Equiv.pprodProd
#align equiv.pprod_prod_apply Equiv.pprodProd_apply
#align equiv.pprod_prod_symm_apply Equiv.pprodProd_symm_apply
/-- Combine two equivalences using `PProd` in the codomain and `Prod` in the domain. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def prodPProd (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
α₁ × β₁ ≃ PProd α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.symm.pprodProd eb.symm).symm
#align equiv.prod_pprod Equiv.prodPProd
#align equiv.prod_pprod_symm_apply Equiv.prodPProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.prod_pprod_apply Equiv.prodPProd_apply
/-- `PProd α β` is equivalent to `PLift α × PLift β` -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def pprodEquivProdPLift : PProd α β ≃ PLift α × PLift β :=
Equiv.plift.symm.pprodProd Equiv.plift.symm
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift_symm_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift_symm_apply
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift_apply
/-- Product of two equivalences. If `α₁ ≃ α₂` and `β₁ ≃ β₂`, then `α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`. This is
`Prod.map` as an equivalence. -/
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 there was also a @[congr] tag
@[simps (config := .asFn) apply]
def prodCongr (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
⟨Prod.map e₁ e₂, Prod.map e₁.symm e₂.symm, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp⟩
#align equiv.prod_congr Equiv.prodCongr
#align equiv.prod_congr_apply Equiv.prodCongr_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodCongr_symm (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(prodCongr e₁ e₂).symm = prodCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_symm Equiv.prodCongr_symm
/-- Type product is commutative up to an equivalence: `α × β ≃ β × α`. This is `Prod.swap` as an
equivalence. -/
def prodComm (α β) : α × β ≃ β × α :=
⟨Prod.swap, Prod.swap, Prod.swap_swap, Prod.swap_swap⟩
#align equiv.prod_comm Equiv.prodComm
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodComm (α β) : (⇑(prodComm α β) : α × β → β × α) = Prod.swap :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_prod_comm Equiv.coe_prodComm
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_apply (x : α × β) : prodComm α β x = x.swap :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_comm_apply Equiv.prodComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_symm (α β) : (prodComm α β).symm = prodComm β α :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_comm_symm Equiv.prodComm_symm
/-- Type product is associative up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def prodAssoc (α β γ) : (α × β) × γ ≃ α × β × γ :=
⟨fun p => (p.1.1, p.1.2, p.2), fun p => ((p.1, p.2.1), p.2.2), fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => rfl,
fun ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.prod_assoc Equiv.prodAssoc
#align equiv.prod_assoc_symm_apply Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply
#align equiv.prod_assoc_apply Equiv.prodAssoc_apply
/-- Four-way commutativity of `prod`. The name matches `mul_mul_mul_comm`. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodProdProdComm (α β γ δ : Type*) : (α × β) × γ × δ ≃ (α × γ) × β × δ where
toFun abcd := ((abcd.1.1, abcd.2.1), (abcd.1.2, abcd.2.2))
invFun acbd := ((acbd.1.1, acbd.2.1), (acbd.1.2, acbd.2.2))
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨_a, _b⟩, ⟨_c, _d⟩⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_a, _c⟩, ⟨_b, _d⟩⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.prod_prod_prod_comm Equiv.prodProdProdComm
@[simp]
theorem prodProdProdComm_symm (α β γ δ : Type*) :
(prodProdProdComm α β γ δ).symm = prodProdProdComm α γ β δ :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_prod_prod_comm_symm Equiv.prodProdProdComm_symm
/-- `γ`-valued functions on `α × β` are equivalent to functions `α → β → γ`. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def curry (α β γ) : (α × β → γ) ≃ (α → β → γ) where
toFun := Function.curry
invFun := uncurry
left_inv := uncurry_curry
right_inv := curry_uncurry
#align equiv.curry Equiv.curry
#align equiv.curry_symm_apply Equiv.curry_symm_apply
#align equiv.curry_apply Equiv.curry_apply
section
/-- `PUnit` is a right identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def prodPUnit (α) : α × PUnit ≃ α :=
⟨fun p => p.1, fun a => (a, PUnit.unit), fun ⟨_, PUnit.unit⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.prod_punit Equiv.prodPUnit
#align equiv.prod_punit_apply Equiv.prodPUnit_apply
#align equiv.prod_punit_symm_apply Equiv.prodPUnit_symm_apply
/-- `PUnit` is a left identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps!]
def punitProd (α) : PUnit × α ≃ α :=
calc
PUnit × α ≃ α × PUnit := prodComm _ _
_ ≃ α := prodPUnit _
#align equiv.punit_prod Equiv.punitProd
#align equiv.punit_prod_symm_apply Equiv.punitProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.punit_prod_apply Equiv.punitProd_apply
/-- `PUnit` is a right identity for dependent type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaPUnit (α) : (_ : α) × PUnit ≃ α :=
⟨fun p => p.1, fun a => ⟨a, PUnit.unit⟩, fun ⟨_, PUnit.unit⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Any `Unique` type is a right identity for type product up to equivalence. -/
def prodUnique (α β) [Unique β] : α × β ≃ α :=
((Equiv.refl α).prodCongr <| equivPUnit.{_,1} β).trans <| prodPUnit α
#align equiv.prod_unique Equiv.prodUnique
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodUnique [Unique β] : (⇑(prodUnique α β) : α × β → α) = Prod.fst :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_prod_unique Equiv.coe_prodUnique
theorem prodUnique_apply [Unique β] (x : α × β) : prodUnique α β x = x.1 :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_unique_apply Equiv.prodUnique_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodUnique_symm_apply [Unique β] (x : α) :
(prodUnique α β).symm x = (x, default) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_unique_symm_apply Equiv.prodUnique_symm_apply
/-- Any `Unique` type is a left identity for type product up to equivalence. -/
def uniqueProd (α β) [Unique β] : β × α ≃ α :=
((equivPUnit.{_,1} β).prodCongr <| Equiv.refl α).trans <| punitProd α
#align equiv.unique_prod Equiv.uniqueProd
@[simp]
theorem coe_uniqueProd [Unique β] : (⇑(uniqueProd α β) : β × α → α) = Prod.snd :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_unique_prod Equiv.coe_uniqueProd
theorem uniqueProd_apply [Unique β] (x : β × α) : uniqueProd α β x = x.2 :=
rfl
#align equiv.unique_prod_apply Equiv.uniqueProd_apply
@[simp]
theorem uniqueProd_symm_apply [Unique β] (x : α) :
(uniqueProd α β).symm x = (default, x) :=
rfl
#align equiv.unique_prod_symm_apply Equiv.uniqueProd_symm_apply
/-- Any family of `Unique` types is a right identity for dependent type product up to
equivalence. -/
def sigmaUnique (α) (β : α → Type*) [∀ a, Unique (β a)] : (a : α) × (β a) ≃ α :=
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun a ↦ equivPUnit.{_,1} (β a)).trans <| sigmaPUnit α
@[simp]
theorem coe_sigmaUnique {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] :
(⇑(sigmaUnique α β) : (a : α) × (β a) → α) = Sigma.fst :=
rfl
theorem sigmaUnique_apply {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] (x : (a : α) × β a) :
sigmaUnique α β x = x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sigmaUnique_symm_apply {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] (x : α) :
(sigmaUnique α β).symm x = ⟨x, default⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `Empty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prodEmpty (α) : α × Empty ≃ Empty :=
equivEmpty _
#align equiv.prod_empty Equiv.prodEmpty
/-- `Empty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def emptyProd (α) : Empty × α ≃ Empty :=
equivEmpty _
#align equiv.empty_prod Equiv.emptyProd
/-- `PEmpty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prodPEmpty (α) : α × PEmpty ≃ PEmpty :=
equivPEmpty _
#align equiv.prod_pempty Equiv.prodPEmpty
/-- `PEmpty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def pemptyProd (α) : PEmpty × α ≃ PEmpty :=
equivPEmpty _
#align equiv.pempty_prod Equiv.pemptyProd
end
section
open Sum
/-- `PSum` is equivalent to `Sum`. -/
def psumEquivSum (α β) : PSum α β ≃ Sum α β where
toFun s := PSum.casesOn s inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim PSum.inl PSum.inr
left_inv s := by cases s <;> rfl
right_inv s := by cases s <;> rfl
#align equiv.psum_equiv_sum Equiv.psumEquivSum
/-- If `α ≃ α'` and `β ≃ β'`, then `α ⊕ β ≃ α' ⊕ β'`. This is `Sum.map` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps apply]
def sumCongr (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) : Sum α₁ β₁ ≃ Sum α₂ β₂ :=
⟨Sum.map ea eb, Sum.map ea.symm eb.symm, fun x => by simp, fun x => by simp⟩
#align equiv.sum_congr Equiv.sumCongr
#align equiv.sum_congr_apply Equiv.sumCongr_apply
/-- If `α ≃ α'` and `β ≃ β'`, then `PSum α β ≃ PSum α' β'`. -/
def psumCongr (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : γ ≃ δ) : PSum α γ ≃ PSum β δ where
toFun x := PSum.casesOn x (PSum.inl ∘ e₁) (PSum.inr ∘ e₂)
invFun x := PSum.casesOn x (PSum.inl ∘ e₁.symm) (PSum.inr ∘ e₂.symm)
left_inv := by rintro (x | x) <;> simp
right_inv := by rintro (x | x) <;> simp
#align equiv.psum_congr Equiv.psumCongr
/-- Combine two `Equiv`s using `PSum` in the domain and `Sum` in the codomain. -/
def psumSum (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
PSum α₁ β₁ ≃ Sum α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.psumCongr eb).trans (psumEquivSum _ _)
#align equiv.psum_sum Equiv.psumSum
/-- Combine two `Equiv`s using `Sum` in the domain and `PSum` in the codomain. -/
def sumPSum (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
Sum α₁ β₁ ≃ PSum α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.symm.psumSum eb.symm).symm
#align equiv.sum_psum Equiv.sumPSum
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_trans (e : α₁ ≃ β₁) (f : α₂ ≃ β₂) (g : β₁ ≃ γ₁) (h : β₂ ≃ γ₂) :
(Equiv.sumCongr e f).trans (Equiv.sumCongr g h) = Equiv.sumCongr (e.trans g) (f.trans h) := by
ext i
cases i <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_trans Equiv.sumCongr_trans
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : γ ≃ δ) :
(Equiv.sumCongr e f).symm = Equiv.sumCongr e.symm f.symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_symm Equiv.sumCongr_symm
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_refl : Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (Sum α β) := by
ext i
cases i <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_refl Equiv.sumCongr_refl
/-- A subtype of a sum is equivalent to a sum of subtypes. -/
def subtypeSum {p : α ⊕ β → Prop} : {c // p c} ≃ {a // p (Sum.inl a)} ⊕ {b // p (Sum.inr b)} where
toFun c := match h : c.1 with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl ⟨a, h ▸ c.2⟩
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr ⟨b, h ▸ c.2⟩
invFun c := match c with
| Sum.inl a => ⟨Sum.inl a, a.2⟩
| Sum.inr b => ⟨Sum.inr b, b.2⟩
left_inv := by rintro ⟨a | b, h⟩ <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (a | b) <;> rfl
namespace Perm
/-- Combine a permutation of `α` and of `β` into a permutation of `α ⊕ β`. -/
abbrev sumCongr (ea : Equiv.Perm α) (eb : Equiv.Perm β) : Equiv.Perm (Sum α β) :=
Equiv.sumCongr ea eb
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr Equiv.Perm.sumCongr
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_apply (ea : Equiv.Perm α) (eb : Equiv.Perm β) (x : Sum α β) :
sumCongr ea eb x = Sum.map (⇑ea) (⇑eb) x :=
Equiv.sumCongr_apply ea eb x
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_apply Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_apply
-- Porting note: it seems the general theorem about `Equiv` is now applied, so there's no need
-- to have this version also have `@[simp]`. Similarly for below.
theorem sumCongr_trans (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : Equiv.Perm β) (g : Equiv.Perm α)
(h : Equiv.Perm β) : (sumCongr e f).trans (sumCongr g h) = sumCongr (e.trans g) (f.trans h) :=
Equiv.sumCongr_trans e f g h
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_trans Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_trans
theorem sumCongr_symm (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : Equiv.Perm β) :
(sumCongr e f).symm = sumCongr e.symm f.symm :=
Equiv.sumCongr_symm e f
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_symm Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_symm
theorem sumCongr_refl : sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (Sum α β) :=
Equiv.sumCongr_refl
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_refl Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_refl
end Perm
/-- `Bool` is equivalent the sum of two `PUnit`s. -/
def boolEquivPUnitSumPUnit : Bool ≃ Sum PUnit.{u + 1} PUnit.{v + 1} :=
⟨fun b => b.casesOn (inl PUnit.unit) (inr PUnit.unit) , Sum.elim (fun _ => false) fun _ => true,
fun b => by cases b <;> rfl, fun s => by rcases s with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit Equiv.boolEquivPUnitSumPUnit
/-- Sum of types is commutative up to an equivalence. This is `Sum.swap` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn) apply]
def sumComm (α β) : Sum α β ≃ Sum β α :=
⟨Sum.swap, Sum.swap, Sum.swap_swap, Sum.swap_swap⟩
#align equiv.sum_comm Equiv.sumComm
#align equiv.sum_comm_apply Equiv.sumComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem sumComm_symm (α β) : (sumComm α β).symm = sumComm β α :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_comm_symm Equiv.sumComm_symm
/-- Sum of types is associative up to an equivalence. -/
def sumAssoc (α β γ) : Sum (Sum α β) γ ≃ Sum α (Sum β γ) :=
⟨Sum.elim (Sum.elim Sum.inl (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inl)) (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr),
Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inl) <| Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inr) Sum.inr,
by rintro (⟨_ | _⟩ | _) <;> rfl, by
rintro (_ | ⟨_ | _⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_assoc Equiv.sumAssoc
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl (a) : sumAssoc α β γ (inl (inl a)) = inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inl_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr (b) : sumAssoc α β γ (inl (inr b)) = inr (inl b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inl_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inr (c) : sumAssoc α β γ (inr c) = inr (inr c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inl {α β γ} (a) : (sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inl a) = inl (inl a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inl {α β γ} (b) :
(sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inr (inl b)) = inl (inr b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inr_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inr {α β γ} (c) : (sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inr (inr c)) = inr c :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inr_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inr
/-- Sum with `IsEmpty` is equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def sumEmpty (α β) [IsEmpty β] : Sum α β ≃ α where
toFun := Sum.elim id isEmptyElim
invFun := inl
left_inv s := by
rcases s with (_ | x)
· rfl
· exact isEmptyElim x
right_inv _ := rfl
#align equiv.sum_empty Equiv.sumEmpty
#align equiv.sum_empty_symm_apply Equiv.sumEmpty_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem sumEmpty_apply_inl [IsEmpty β] (a : α) : sumEmpty α β (Sum.inl a) = a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_empty_apply_inl Equiv.sumEmpty_apply_inl
/-- The sum of `IsEmpty` with any type is equivalent to that type. -/
@[simps! symm_apply]
def emptySum (α β) [IsEmpty α] : Sum α β ≃ β :=
(sumComm _ _).trans <| sumEmpty _ _
#align equiv.empty_sum Equiv.emptySum
#align equiv.empty_sum_symm_apply Equiv.emptySum_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem emptySum_apply_inr [IsEmpty α] (b : β) : emptySum α β (Sum.inr b) = b :=
rfl
#align equiv.empty_sum_apply_inr Equiv.emptySum_apply_inr
/-- `Option α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ PUnit` -/
def optionEquivSumPUnit (α) : Option α ≃ Sum α PUnit :=
⟨fun o => o.elim (inr PUnit.unit) inl, fun s => s.elim some fun _ => none,
fun o => by cases o <;> rfl,
fun s => by rcases s with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_none : optionEquivSumPUnit α none = Sum.inr PUnit.unit :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_none Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_none
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_some (a) : optionEquivSumPUnit α (some a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_some Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_some
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_coe (a : α) : optionEquivSumPUnit α a = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_coe Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_coe
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inl (a) : (optionEquivSumPUnit α).symm (Sum.inl a) = a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inl Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inl
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inr (a) : (optionEquivSumPUnit α).symm (Sum.inr a) = none :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inr Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inr
/-- The set of `x : Option α` such that `isSome x` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps]
def optionIsSomeEquiv (α) : { x : Option α // x.isSome } ≃ α where
toFun o := Option.get _ o.2
invFun x := ⟨some x, rfl⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.eq <| Option.some_get _
right_inv _ := Option.get_some _ _
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv_apply Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv_apply
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv_symm_apply_coe Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv_symm_apply_coe
/-- The product over `Option α` of `β a` is the binary product of the
product over `α` of `β (some α)` and `β none` -/
@[simps]
def piOptionEquivProd {β : Option α → Type*} :
(∀ a : Option α, β a) ≃ β none × ∀ a : α, β (some a) where
toFun f := (f none, fun a => f (some a))
invFun x a := Option.casesOn a x.fst x.snd
left_inv f := funext fun a => by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv x := by simp
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod Equiv.piOptionEquivProd
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.piOptionEquivProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.piOptionEquivProd_apply
/-- `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to a `Sigma`-type over `Bool`. Note that this definition assumes `α` and
`β` to be types from the same universe, so it cannot be used directly to transfer theorems about
sigma types to theorems about sum types. In many cases one can use `ULift` to work around this
difficulty. -/
def sumEquivSigmaBool (α β : Type u) : Sum α β ≃ Σ b : Bool, b.casesOn α β :=
⟨fun s => s.elim (fun x => ⟨false, x⟩) fun x => ⟨true, x⟩, fun s =>
match s with
| ⟨false, a⟩ => inl a
| ⟨true, b⟩ => inr b,
fun s => by cases s <;> rfl, fun s => by rcases s with ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool Equiv.sumEquivSigmaBool
-- See also `Equiv.sigmaPreimageEquiv`.
/-- `sigmaFiberEquiv f` for `f : α → β` is the natural equivalence between
the type of all fibres of `f` and the total space `α`. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : (Σ y : β, { x // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => ↑x.2, fun x => ⟨f x, x, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_apply Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_apply
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_symm_apply_fst Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_symm_apply_fst
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_symm_apply_snd_coe Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_symm_apply_snd_coe
/-- Inhabited types are equivalent to `Option β` for some `β` by identifying `default` with `none`.
-/
def sigmaEquivOptionOfInhabited (α : Type u) [Inhabited α] [DecidableEq α] :
Σ β : Type u, α ≃ Option β where
fst := {a // a ≠ default}
snd.toFun a := if h : a = default then none else some ⟨a, h⟩
snd.invFun := Option.elim' default (↑)
snd.left_inv a := by dsimp only; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
snd.right_inv
| none => by simp
| some ⟨a, ha⟩ => dif_neg ha
#align equiv.sigma_equiv_option_of_inhabited Equiv.sigmaEquivOptionOfInhabited
end
section sumCompl
/-- For any predicate `p` on `α`,
the sum of the two subtypes `{a // p a}` and its complement `{a // ¬ p a}`
is naturally equivalent to `α`.
See `subtypeOrEquiv` for sum types over subtypes `{x // p x}` and `{x // q x}`
that are not necessarily `IsCompl p q`. -/
def sumCompl {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Sum { a // p a } { a // ¬p a } ≃ α where
toFun := Sum.elim Subtype.val Subtype.val
invFun a := if h : p a then Sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ else Sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩
left_inv := by
rintro (⟨x, hx⟩ | ⟨x, hx⟩) <;> dsimp
· rw [dif_pos]
· rw [dif_neg]
right_inv a := by
dsimp
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl Equiv.sumCompl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inl (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : { a // p a }) :
sumCompl p (Sum.inl x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_inl Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inr (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : { a // ¬p a }) :
sumCompl p (Sum.inr x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_inr Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_symm_of_pos (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (a : α) (h : p a) :
(sumCompl p).symm a = Sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_symm_of_pos Equiv.sumCompl_apply_symm_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_symm_of_neg (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
(sumCompl p).symm a = Sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_symm_of_neg Equiv.sumCompl_apply_symm_of_neg
/-- Combines an `Equiv` between two subtypes with an `Equiv` between their complements to form a
permutation. -/
def subtypeCongr {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(e : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x }) (f : { x // ¬p x } ≃ { x // ¬q x }) : Perm α :=
(sumCompl p).symm.trans ((sumCongr e f).trans (sumCompl q))
#align equiv.subtype_congr Equiv.subtypeCongr
variable {p : ε → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
variable (ep ep' : Perm { a // p a }) (en en' : Perm { a // ¬p a })
/-- Combining permutations on `ε` that permute only inside or outside the subtype
split induced by `p : ε → Prop` constructs a permutation on `ε`. -/
def Perm.subtypeCongr : Equiv.Perm ε :=
permCongr (sumCompl p) (sumCongr ep en)
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.apply (a : ε) : ep.subtypeCongr en a =
if h : p a then (ep ⟨a, h⟩ : ε) else en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [Perm.subtypeCongr, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply {a : ε} (h : p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.left_apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype (a : { a // p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply ep en a.property
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.left_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply {a : ε} (h : ¬p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.right_apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype (a : { a // ¬p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply ep en a.property
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.right_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.refl :
Perm.subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl { a // p a }) (Equiv.refl { a // ¬p a }) = Equiv.refl ε := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x <;> simp [h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.refl Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.refl
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.symm : (ep.subtypeCongr en).symm = Perm.subtypeCongr ep.symm en.symm := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x
· have : p (ep.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
· have : ¬p (en.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en.symm _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.symm Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.symm
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.trans :
(ep.subtypeCongr en).trans (ep'.subtypeCongr en')
= Perm.subtypeCongr (ep.trans ep') (en.trans en') := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x
· have : p (ep ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, this]
· have : ¬p (en ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.trans Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.trans
end sumCompl
section subtypePreimage
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x₀ : { a // p a } → β)
/-- For a fixed function `x₀ : {a // p a} → β` defined on a subtype of `α`,
the subtype of functions `x : α → β` that agree with `x₀` on the subtype `{a // p a}`
is naturally equivalent to the type of functions `{a // ¬ p a} → β`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypePreimage : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ } ≃ ({ a // ¬p a } → β) where
toFun (x : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ }) a := (x : α → β) a
invFun x := ⟨fun a => if h : p a then x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ else x ⟨a, h⟩, funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ => dif_pos h⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
Subtype.val_injective <|
funext fun a => by
dsimp only
split_ifs
· rw [← hx]; rfl
· rfl
right_inv x :=
funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
show dite (p a) _ _ = _ by
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg h]
#align equiv.subtype_preimage Equiv.subtypePreimage
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_apply Equiv.subtypePreimage_apply
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_pos Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_neg Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg
end subtypePreimage
section
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `∀ a, β₁ a` and
`∀ a, β₂ a`. -/
def piCongrRight {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (∀ a, β₁ a) ≃ (∀ a, β₂ a) :=
⟨fun H a => F a (H a), fun H a => (F a).symm (H a), fun H => funext <| by simp,
fun H => funext <| by simp⟩
#align equiv.Pi_congr_right Equiv.piCongrRight
/-- Given `φ : α → β → Sort*`, we have an equivalence between `∀ a b, φ a b` and `∀ b a, φ a b`.
This is `Function.swap` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def piComm (φ : α → β → Sort*) : (∀ a b, φ a b) ≃ ∀ b a, φ a b :=
⟨swap, swap, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.Pi_comm Equiv.piComm
#align equiv.Pi_comm_apply Equiv.piComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem piComm_symm {φ : α → β → Sort*} : (piComm φ).symm = (piComm <| swap φ) :=
rfl
#align equiv.Pi_comm_symm Equiv.piComm_symm
/-- Dependent `curry` equivalence: the type of dependent functions on `Σ i, β i` is equivalent
to the type of dependent functions of two arguments (i.e., functions to the space of functions).
This is `Sigma.curry` and `Sigma.uncurry` together as an equiv. -/
def piCurry {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) :
(∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) ≃ ∀ a b, γ a b where
toFun := Sigma.curry
invFun := Sigma.uncurry
left_inv := Sigma.uncurry_curry
right_inv := Sigma.curry_uncurry
#align equiv.Pi_curry Equiv.piCurry
-- `simps` overapplies these but `simps (config := .asFn)` under-applies them
@[simp] theorem piCurry_apply {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*)
(f : ∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) :
piCurry γ f = Sigma.curry f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem piCurry_symm_apply {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) (f : ∀ a b, γ a b) :
(piCurry γ).symm f = Sigma.uncurry f :=
rfl
end
section prodCongr
variable (e : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂)
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `β₁ × α₁` and `β₂ × α₁`. -/
def prodCongrLeft : β₁ × α₁ ≃ β₂ × α₁ where
toFun ab := ⟨e ab.2 ab.1, ab.2⟩
invFun ab := ⟨(e ab.2).symm ab.1, ab.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_left Equiv.prodCongrLeft
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrLeft_apply (b : β₁) (a : α₁) : prodCongrLeft e (b, a) = (e a b, a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_left_apply Equiv.prodCongrLeft_apply
theorem prodCongr_refl_right (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prodCongr e (Equiv.refl α₁) = prodCongrLeft fun _ => e := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_refl_right Equiv.prodCongr_refl_right
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `α₁ × β₁` and `α₁ × β₂`. -/
def prodCongrRight : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₁ × β₂ where
toFun ab := ⟨ab.1, e ab.1 ab.2⟩
invFun ab := ⟨ab.1, (e ab.1).symm ab.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_right Equiv.prodCongrRight
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrRight_apply (a : α₁) (b : β₁) : prodCongrRight e (a, b) = (a, e a b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_right_apply Equiv.prodCongrRight_apply
theorem prodCongr_refl_left (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prodCongr (Equiv.refl α₁) e = prodCongrRight fun _ => e := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_refl_left Equiv.prodCongr_refl_left
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrLeft_trans_prodComm :
(prodCongrLeft e).trans (prodComm _ _) = (prodComm _ _).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_left_trans_prod_comm Equiv.prodCongrLeft_trans_prodComm
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrRight_trans_prodComm :
(prodCongrRight e).trans (prodComm _ _) = (prodComm _ _).trans (prodCongrLeft e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_right_trans_prod_comm Equiv.prodCongrRight_trans_prodComm
theorem sigmaCongrRight_sigmaEquivProd :
(sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂)
= (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.sigma_congr_right_sigma_equiv_prod Equiv.sigmaCongrRight_sigmaEquivProd
theorem sigmaEquivProd_sigmaCongrRight :
(sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).symm.trans (sigmaCongrRight e)
= (prodCongrRight e).trans (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂).symm := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp only [trans_apply, sigmaCongrRight_apply, prodCongrRight_apply]
rfl
#align equiv.sigma_equiv_prod_sigma_congr_right Equiv.sigmaEquivProd_sigmaCongrRight
-- See also `Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv`.
/-- A family of equivalences between fibers gives an equivalence between domains. -/
@[simps!]
def ofFiberEquiv {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) : α ≃ β :=
(sigmaFiberEquiv f).symm.trans <| (Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaFiberEquiv g)
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv Equiv.ofFiberEquiv
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_apply Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_apply
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_symm_apply Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_symm_apply
theorem ofFiberEquiv_map {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) (a : α) : g (ofFiberEquiv e a) = f a :=
(_ : { b // g b = _ }).property
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_map Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_map
/-- A variation on `Equiv.prodCongr` where the equivalence in the second component can depend
on the first component. A typical example is a shear mapping, explaining the name of this
declaration. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def prodShear (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ where
toFun := fun x : α₁ × β₁ => (e₁ x.1, e₂ x.1 x.2)
invFun := fun y : α₂ × β₂ => (e₁.symm y.1, (e₂ <| e₁.symm y.1).symm y.2)
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩
simp only [symm_apply_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩
simp only [apply_symm_apply]
#align equiv.prod_shear Equiv.prodShear
#align equiv.prod_shear_apply Equiv.prodShear_apply
#align equiv.prod_shear_symm_apply Equiv.prodShear_symm_apply
end prodCongr
namespace Perm
variable [DecidableEq α₁] (a : α₁) (e : Perm β₁)
/-- `prodExtendRight a e` extends `e : Perm β` to `Perm (α × β)` by sending `(a, b)` to
`(a, e b)` and keeping the other `(a', b)` fixed. -/
def prodExtendRight : Perm (α₁ × β₁) where
toFun ab := if ab.fst = a then (a, e ab.snd) else ab
invFun ab := if ab.fst = a then (a, e.symm ab.snd) else ab
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨k', x⟩
dsimp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [h₁]
· simp at h₂
· simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨k', x⟩
dsimp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [h₁]
· simp at h₂
· simp
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight
@[simp]
theorem prodExtendRight_apply_eq (b : β₁) : prodExtendRight a e (a, b) = (a, e b) :=
if_pos rfl
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right_apply_eq Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight_apply_eq
theorem prodExtendRight_apply_ne {a a' : α₁} (h : a' ≠ a) (b : β₁) :
prodExtendRight a e (a', b) = (a', b) :=
if_neg h
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right_apply_ne Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight_apply_ne
theorem eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne {e : Perm β₁} {a a' : α₁} {b : β₁}
(h : prodExtendRight a e (a', b) ≠ (a', b)) : a' = a := by
contrapose! h
exact prodExtendRight_apply_ne _ h _
#align equiv.perm.eq_of_prod_extend_right_ne Equiv.Perm.eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne
@[simp]
theorem fst_prodExtendRight (ab : α₁ × β₁) : (prodExtendRight a e ab).fst = ab.fst := by
rw [prodExtendRight]
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
· rfl
#align equiv.perm.fst_prod_extend_right Equiv.Perm.fst_prodExtendRight
end Perm
section
/-- The type of functions to a product `α × β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
`γ → α` and `γ → β`. -/
def arrowProdEquivProdArrow (α β γ : Type*) : (γ → α × β) ≃ (γ → α) × (γ → β) where
toFun := fun f => (fun c => (f c).1, fun c => (f c).2)
invFun := fun p c => (p.1 c, p.2 c)
left_inv := fun f => rfl
right_inv := fun p => by cases p; rfl
#align equiv.arrow_prod_equiv_prod_arrow Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow
open Sum
/-- The type of dependent functions on a sum type `ι ⊕ ι'` is equivalent to the type of pairs of
functions on `ι` and on `ι'`. This is a dependent version of `Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow`. -/
@[simps]
def sumPiEquivProdPi (π : ι ⊕ ι' → Type*) : (∀ i, π i) ≃ (∀ i, π (inl i)) × ∀ i', π (inr i') where
toFun f := ⟨fun i => f (inl i), fun i' => f (inr i')⟩
invFun g := Sum.rec g.1 g.2
left_inv f := by ext (i | i) <;> rfl
right_inv g := Prod.ext rfl rfl
/-- The equivalence between a product of two dependent functions types and a single dependent
function type. Basically a symmetric version of `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
@[simps!]
def prodPiEquivSumPi (π : ι → Type u) (π' : ι' → Type u) :
((∀ i, π i) × ∀ i', π' i') ≃ ∀ i, Sum.elim π π' i :=
sumPiEquivProdPi (Sum.elim π π') |>.symm
/-- The type of functions on a sum type `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
on `α` and on `β`. -/
def sumArrowEquivProdArrow (α β γ : Type*) : (Sum α β → γ) ≃ (α → γ) × (β → γ) :=
⟨fun f => (f ∘ inl, f ∘ inr), fun p => Sum.elim p.1 p.2, fun f => by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl, fun p => by
cases p
rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_fst (f : Sum α β → γ) (a : α) :
(sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ f).1 a = f (inl a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_apply_fst Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_fst
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_snd (f : Sum α β → γ) (b : β) :
(sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ f).2 b = f (inr b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_apply_snd Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_snd
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inl (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) (a : α) :
((sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ).symm (f, g)) (inl a) = f a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inl Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inr (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) (b : β) :
((sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ).symm (f, g)) (inr b) = g b :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inr Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inr
/-- Type product is right distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def sumProdDistrib (α β γ) : Sum α β × γ ≃ Sum (α × γ) (β × γ) :=
⟨fun p => p.1.map (fun x => (x, p.2)) fun x => (x, p.2),
fun s => s.elim (Prod.map inl id) (Prod.map inr id), by
rintro ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl, by rintro (⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib Equiv.sumProdDistrib
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_apply_left (a : α) (c : γ) :
sumProdDistrib α β γ (Sum.inl a, c) = Sum.inl (a, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_apply_left Equiv.sumProdDistrib_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_apply_right (b : β) (c : γ) :
sumProdDistrib α β γ (Sum.inr b, c) = Sum.inr (b, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_apply_right Equiv.sumProdDistrib_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_left (a : α × γ) :
(sumProdDistrib α β γ).symm (inl a) = (inl a.1, a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_symm_apply_left Equiv.sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_right (b : β × γ) :
(sumProdDistrib α β γ).symm (inr b) = (inr b.1, b.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_symm_apply_right Equiv.sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_right
/-- Type product is left distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def prodSumDistrib (α β γ) : α × Sum β γ ≃ Sum (α × β) (α × γ) :=
calc
α × Sum β γ ≃ Sum β γ × α := prodComm _ _
_ ≃ Sum (β × α) (γ × α) := sumProdDistrib _ _ _
_ ≃ Sum (α × β) (α × γ) := sumCongr (prodComm _ _) (prodComm _ _)
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib Equiv.prodSumDistrib
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_apply_left (a : α) (b : β) :
prodSumDistrib α β γ (a, Sum.inl b) = Sum.inl (a, b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_apply_left Equiv.prodSumDistrib_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_apply_right (a : α) (c : γ) :
prodSumDistrib α β γ (a, Sum.inr c) = Sum.inr (a, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_apply_right Equiv.prodSumDistrib_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_left (a : α × β) :
(prodSumDistrib α β γ).symm (inl a) = (a.1, inl a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_symm_apply_left Equiv.prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_right (a : α × γ) :
(prodSumDistrib α β γ).symm (inr a) = (a.1, inr a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_symm_apply_right Equiv.prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_right
/-- An indexed sum of disjoint sums of types is equivalent to the sum of the indexed sums. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaSumDistrib (α β : ι → Type*) :
(Σ i, Sum (α i) (β i)) ≃ Sum (Σ i, α i) (Σ i, β i) :=
⟨fun p => p.2.map (Sigma.mk p.1) (Sigma.mk p.1),
Sum.elim (Sigma.map id fun _ => Sum.inl) (Sigma.map id fun _ => Sum.inr), fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨i, a | b⟩ <;> rfl, fun p => by rcases p with (⟨i, a⟩ | ⟨i, b⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib_apply Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib_apply
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib_symm_apply Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib_symm_apply
/-- The product of an indexed sum of types (formally, a `Sigma`-type `Σ i, α i`) by a type `β` is
equivalent to the sum of products `Σ i, (α i × β)`. -/
def sigmaProdDistrib (α : ι → Type*) (β : Type*) : (Σ i, α i) × β ≃ Σ i, α i × β :=
⟨fun p => ⟨p.1.1, (p.1.2, p.2)⟩, fun p => (⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩, p.2.2), fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩
rfl, fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩⟩
rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_prod_distrib Equiv.sigmaProdDistrib
/-- An equivalence that separates out the 0th fiber of `(Σ (n : ℕ), f n)`. -/
def sigmaNatSucc (f : ℕ → Type u) : (Σ n, f n) ≃ Sum (f 0) (Σ n, f (n + 1)) :=
⟨fun x =>
@Sigma.casesOn ℕ f (fun _ => Sum (f 0) (Σn, f (n + 1))) x fun n =>
@Nat.casesOn (fun i => f i → Sum (f 0) (Σn : ℕ, f (n + 1))) n (fun x : f 0 => Sum.inl x)
fun (n : ℕ) (x : f n.succ) => Sum.inr ⟨n, x⟩,
Sum.elim (Sigma.mk 0) (Sigma.map Nat.succ fun _ => id), by rintro ⟨n | n, x⟩ <;> rfl, by
rintro (x | ⟨n, x⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_nat_succ Equiv.sigmaNatSucc
/-- The product `Bool × α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ α`. -/
@[simps]
def boolProdEquivSum (α) : Bool × α ≃ Sum α α where
toFun p := p.1.casesOn (inl p.2) (inr p.2)
invFun := Sum.elim (Prod.mk false) (Prod.mk true)
left_inv := by rintro ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum Equiv.boolProdEquivSum
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum_apply Equiv.boolProdEquivSum_apply
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum_symm_apply Equiv.boolProdEquivSum_symm_apply
/-- The function type `Bool → α` is equivalent to `α × α`. -/
@[simps]
def boolArrowEquivProd (α) : (Bool → α) ≃ α × α where
toFun f := (f false, f true)
invFun p b := b.casesOn p.1 p.2
left_inv _ := funext <| Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
right_inv := fun _ => rfl
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd_apply
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd_symm_apply
end
section
open Sum Nat
/-- The set of natural numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ PUnit`. -/
def natEquivNatSumPUnit : ℕ ≃ Sum ℕ PUnit where
toFun n := Nat.casesOn n (inr PUnit.unit) inl
invFun := Sum.elim Nat.succ fun _ => 0
left_inv n := by cases n <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
#align equiv.nat_equiv_nat_sum_punit Equiv.natEquivNatSumPUnit
/-- `ℕ ⊕ PUnit` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def natSumPUnitEquivNat : Sum ℕ PUnit ≃ ℕ :=
natEquivNatSumPUnit.symm
#align equiv.nat_sum_punit_equiv_nat Equiv.natSumPUnitEquivNat
/-- The type of integer numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ ℕ`. -/
def intEquivNatSumNat : ℤ ≃ Sum ℕ ℕ where
toFun z := Int.casesOn z inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim Int.ofNat Int.negSucc
left_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
#align equiv.int_equiv_nat_sum_nat Equiv.intEquivNatSumNat
end
/-- An equivalence between `α` and `β` generates an equivalence between `List α` and `List β`. -/
def listEquivOfEquiv (e : α ≃ β) : List α ≃ List β where
toFun := List.map e
invFun := List.map e.symm
left_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.symm_comp_self, List.map_id]
right_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.self_comp_symm, List.map_id]
#align equiv.list_equiv_of_equiv Equiv.listEquivOfEquiv
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Unique α` is equivalent to `Unique β`. -/
def uniqueCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α ≃ Unique β where
toFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e.symm
invFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align equiv.unique_congr Equiv.uniqueCongr
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `IsEmpty α` is equivalent to `IsEmpty β`. -/
theorem isEmpty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : IsEmpty α ↔ IsEmpty β :=
⟨fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e.symm, fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e⟩
#align equiv.is_empty_congr Equiv.isEmpty_congr
protected theorem isEmpty (e : α ≃ β) [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty α :=
e.isEmpty_congr.mpr ‹_›
#align equiv.is_empty Equiv.isEmpty
section
open Subtype
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and the predicates `p : α → Prop` and `q : β → Prop` are equivalent
at corresponding points, then `{a // p a}` is equivalent to `{b // q b}`.
For the statement where `α = β`, that is, `e : perm α`, see `Perm.subtypePerm`. -/
def subtypeEquiv {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // q b } where
toFun a := ⟨e a, (h _).mp a.property⟩
invFun b := ⟨e.symm b, (h _).mpr ((e.apply_symm_apply b).symm ▸ b.property)⟩
left_inv a := Subtype.ext <| by simp
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| by simp
#align equiv.subtype_equiv Equiv.subtypeEquiv
lemma coe_subtypeEquiv_eq_map {X Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} (e : X ≃ Y)
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (e x)) : ⇑(e.subtypeEquiv h) = Subtype.map e (h · |>.mp) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_refl {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ p (Equiv.refl _ a) := fun a => Iff.rfl) :
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv h = Equiv.refl { a : α // p a } := by
ext
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_refl Equiv.subtypeEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_symm {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).symm =
e.symm.subtypeEquiv fun a => by
convert (h <| e.symm a).symm
exact (e.apply_symm_apply a).symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_symm Equiv.subtypeEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_trans {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ)
(h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (h' : ∀ b : β, q b ↔ r (f b)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).trans (f.subtypeEquiv h')
= (e.trans f).subtypeEquiv fun a => (h a).trans (h' <| e a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_trans Equiv.subtypeEquiv_trans
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_apply {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (x : { x // p x }) :
e.subtypeEquiv h x = ⟨e x, (h _).1 x.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_apply Equiv.subtypeEquiv_apply
/-- If two predicates `p` and `q` are pointwise equivalent, then `{x // p x}` is equivalent to
`{x // q x}`. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeEquivRight {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x) : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x } :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl _) e
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right Equiv.subtypeEquivRight
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeEquivRight_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right_symm_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply_coe
lemma subtypeEquivRight_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // p x }) : subtypeEquivRight e z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mp z.2⟩ := rfl
lemma subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // q x }) : (subtypeEquivRight e).symm z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mpr z.2⟩ := rfl
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : β → Prop` the subtype `{a // p (e a)}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p b}`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype {p : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) : { a : α // p (e a) } ≃ { b : β // p b } :=
subtypeEquiv e <| by simp
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype Equiv.subtypeEquivOfSubtype
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : α → Prop` the subtype `{a // p a}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p (e.symm b)}`. This version is used by `equiv_rw`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype' {p : α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // p (e.symm b) } :=
e.symm.subtypeEquivOfSubtype.symm
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype' Equiv.subtypeEquivOfSubtype'
/-- If two predicates are equal, then the corresponding subtypes are equivalent. -/
def subtypeEquivProp {p q : α → Prop} (h : p = q) : Subtype p ≃ Subtype q :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl α) fun _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_prop Equiv.subtypeEquivProp
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. This
version allows the “inner” predicate to depend on `h : p a`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists (p : α → Prop) (q : Subtype p → Prop) :
Subtype q ≃ { a : α // ∃ h : p a, q ⟨a, h⟩ } :=
⟨fun a =>
⟨a.1, a.1.2, by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a, hap⟩, haq⟩
exact haq⟩,
fun a => ⟨⟨a, a.2.fst⟩, a.2.snd⟩, fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists_symm_apply_coe_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists_apply_coe
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter {α : Type u} (p q : α → Prop) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists p _).trans <|
subtypeEquivRight fun x => @exists_prop (q x) (p x)
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter_symm_apply_coe_coe
/-- If the outer subtype has more restrictive predicate than the inner one,
then we can drop the latter. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ {x}, q x → p x) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype q :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter p _).trans <| subtypeEquivRight fun _ => and_iff_right_of_imp h
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype_symm_apply_coe_coe
/-- If a proposition holds for all elements, then the subtype is
equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def subtypeUnivEquiv {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) : Subtype p ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => ⟨x, h x⟩, fun _ => Subtype.eq rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv_apply Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv_apply
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv_symm_apply Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv_symm_apply
/-- A subtype of a sigma-type is a sigma-type over a subtype. -/
def subtypeSigmaEquiv (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) : { y : Sigma p // q y.1 } ≃ Σ x :
Subtype q, p x.1 :=
⟨fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun _ => rfl,
fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_sigma_equiv Equiv.subtypeSigmaEquiv
/-- A sigma type over a subtype is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty outside of the subset -/
def sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(Σ x : Subtype q, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p x :=
(subtypeSigmaEquiv p q).symm.trans <| subtypeUnivEquiv fun x => h x.1 x.2
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_equiv_of_subset Equiv.sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset
/-- If a predicate `p : β → Prop` is true on the range of a map `f : α → β`, then
`Σ y : {y // p y}, {x // f x = y}` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (p : β → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
(Σ y : Subtype p, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
calc
_ ≃ Σy : β, { x : α // f x = y } := sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ p fun _ ⟨x, h'⟩ => h' ▸ h x
_ ≃ α := sigmaFiberEquiv f
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_fiber_equiv Equiv.sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv
/-- If for each `x` we have `p x ↔ q (f x)`, then `Σ y : {y // q y}, f ⁻¹' {y}` is equivalent
to `{x // p x}`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (f x)) : (Σ y : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Subtype p :=
calc
(Σy : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Σy :
Subtype q, { x : Subtype p // Subtype.mk (f x) ((h x).1 x.2) = y } := by {
apply sigmaCongrRight
intro y
apply Equiv.symm
refine (subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists _ _).trans (subtypeEquivRight ?_)
intro x
exact ⟨fun ⟨hp, h'⟩ => congr_arg Subtype.val h', fun h' => ⟨(h x).2 (h'.symm ▸ y.2),
Subtype.eq h'⟩⟩ }
_ ≃ Subtype p := sigmaFiberEquiv fun x : Subtype p => (⟨f x, (h x).1 x.property⟩ : Subtype q)
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_fiber_equiv_subtype Equiv.sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype
/-- A sigma type over an `Option` is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty at none. -/
def sigmaOptionEquivOfSome (p : Option α → Type v) (h : p none → False) :
(Σ x : Option α, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p (some x) :=
haveI h' : ∀ x, p x → x.isSome := by
intro x
cases x
· intro n
exfalso
exact h n
· intro _
exact rfl
(sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ _ h').symm.trans (sigmaCongrLeft' (optionIsSomeEquiv α))
#align equiv.sigma_option_equiv_of_some Equiv.sigmaOptionEquivOfSome
/-- The `Pi`-type `∀ i, π i` is equivalent to the type of sections `f : ι → Σ i, π i` of the
`Sigma` type such that for all `i` we have `(f i).fst = i`. -/
def piEquivSubtypeSigma (ι) (π : ι → Type*) :
(∀ i, π i) ≃ { f : ι → Σ i, π i // ∀ i, (f i).1 = i } where
toFun := fun f => ⟨fun i => ⟨i, f i⟩, fun i => rfl⟩
invFun := fun f i => by rw [← f.2 i]; exact (f.1 i).2
left_inv := fun f => funext fun i => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| funext fun i =>
Sigma.eq (hf i).symm <| eq_of_heq <| rec_heq_of_heq _ <| by simp
#align equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma Equiv.piEquivSubtypeSigma
/-- The type of functions `f : ∀ a, β a` such that for all `a` we have `p a (f a)` is equivalent
to the type of functions `∀ a, {b : β a // p a b}`. -/
def subtypePiEquivPi {β : α → Sort v} {p : ∀ a, β a → Prop} :
{ f : ∀ a, β a // ∀ a, p a (f a) } ≃ ∀ a, { b : β a // p a b } where
toFun := fun f a => ⟨f.1 a, f.2 a⟩
invFun := fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).1, fun a => (f a).2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, h⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro f
funext a
exact Subtype.ext_val rfl
#align equiv.subtype_pi_equiv_pi Equiv.subtypePiEquivPi
/-- A subtype of a product defined by componentwise conditions
is equivalent to a product of subtypes. -/
def subtypeProdEquivProd {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
{ c : α × β // p c.1 ∧ q c.2 } ≃ { a // p a } × { b // q b } where
toFun := fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩
invFun := fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_prod_equiv_prod Equiv.subtypeProdEquivProd
/-- A subtype of a `Prod` that depends only on the first component is equivalent to the
corresponding subtype of the first type times the second type. -/
def prodSubtypeFstEquivSubtypeProd {p : α → Prop} : {s : α × β // p s.1} ≃ {a // p a} × β where
toFun x := ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- A subtype of a `Prod` is equivalent to a sigma type whose fibers are subtypes. -/
def subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype (p : α → β → Prop) :
{ x : α × β // p x.1 x.2 } ≃ Σa, { b : β // p a b } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, x.property⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1, x.2⟩, x.2.property⟩
left_inv x := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨a, b, pab⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_prod_equiv_sigma_subtype Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype
/-- The type `∀ (i : α), β i` can be split as a product by separating the indices in `α`
depending on whether they satisfy a predicate `p` or not. -/
@[simps]
def piEquivPiSubtypeProd {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (β : α → Type*) [DecidablePred p] :
(∀ i : α, β i) ≃ (∀ i : { x // p x }, β i) × ∀ i : { x // ¬p x }, β i where
toFun f := (fun x => f x, fun x => f x)
invFun f x := if h : p x then f.1 ⟨x, h⟩ else f.2 ⟨x, h⟩
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, g⟩
ext1 <;>
· ext y
rcases y with ⟨val, property⟩
simp only [property, dif_pos, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
left_inv f := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x <;>
· simp only [h, dif_neg, dif_pos, not_false_iff]
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_apply Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_apply Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd_apply
/-- A product of types can be split as the binary product of one of the types and the product
of all the remaining types. -/
@[simps]
def piSplitAt {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (β : α → Type*) :
(∀ j, β j) ≃ β i × ∀ j : { j // j ≠ i }, β j where
toFun f := ⟨f i, fun j => f j⟩
invFun f j := if h : j = i then h.symm.rec f.1 else f.2 ⟨j, h⟩
right_inv f := by
ext x
exacts [dif_pos rfl, (dif_neg x.2).trans (by cases x; rfl)]
left_inv f := by
ext x
dsimp only
split_ifs with h
· subst h; rfl
· rfl
#align equiv.pi_split_at Equiv.piSplitAt
#align equiv.pi_split_at_apply Equiv.piSplitAt_apply
#align equiv.pi_split_at_symm_apply Equiv.piSplitAt_symm_apply
/-- A product of copies of a type can be split as the binary product of one copy and the product
of all the remaining copies. -/
@[simps!]
def funSplitAt {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (β : Type*) :
(α → β) ≃ β × ({ j // j ≠ i } → β) :=
piSplitAt i _
#align equiv.fun_split_at Equiv.funSplitAt
#align equiv.fun_split_at_symm_apply Equiv.funSplitAt_symm_apply
#align equiv.fun_split_at_apply Equiv.funSplitAt_apply
end
section subtypeEquivCodomain
variable [DecidableEq X] {x : X}
/-- The type of all functions `X → Y` with prescribed values for all `x' ≠ x`
is equivalent to the codomain `Y`. -/
def subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
{ g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } ≃ Y :=
(subtypePreimage _ f).trans <|
@funUnique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } _ <|
show Unique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } from
@Equiv.unique _ _
(show Unique { x' // x' = x } from {
default := ⟨x, rfl⟩, uniq := fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.val_injective h })
(subtypeEquivRight fun _ => not_not)
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
(subtypeEquivCodomain f : _ → Y) =
fun g : { g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } => (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_subtype_equiv_codomain Equiv.coe_subtypeEquivCodomain
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (g) :
subtypeEquivCodomain f g = (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_apply Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_apply
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm : Y → _) = fun y =>
⟨fun x' => if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y, by
funext x'
simp only [ne_eq, dite_not, comp_apply, Subtype.coe_eta, dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro w
exfalso
exact x'.property w⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_subtype_equiv_codomain_symm Equiv.coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x = y :=
dif_neg (not_not.mpr rfl)
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_eq Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
(f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) (h : x' ≠ x) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = f ⟨x', h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_ne Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
end subtypeEquivCodomain
instance : CanLift (α → β) (α ≃ β) (↑) Bijective where prf f hf := ⟨ofBijective f hf, rfl⟩
section
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : Perm α') {p : β' → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α' ≃ Subtype p)
/-- Extend the domain of `e : Equiv.Perm α` to one that is over `β` via `f : α → Subtype p`,
where `p : β → Prop`, permuting only the `b : β` that satisfy `p b`.
This can be used to extend the domain across a function `f : α → β`,
keeping everything outside of `Set.range f` fixed. For this use-case `Equiv` given by `f` can
be constructed by `Equiv.of_leftInverse'` or `Equiv.of_leftInverse` when there is a known
inverse, or `Equiv.ofInjective` in the general case.
-/
def Perm.extendDomain : Perm β' :=
(permCongr f e).subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl _)
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain Equiv.Perm.extendDomain
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_image (a : α') : e.extendDomain f (f a) = f (e a) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_image Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_image
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype {b : β'} (h : p b) :
e.extendDomain f b = f (e (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩)) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype {b : β'} (h : ¬p b) : e.extendDomain f b = b := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_not_subtype Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_refl : Perm.extendDomain (Equiv.refl _) f = Equiv.refl _ := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_refl Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_refl
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_symm : (e.extendDomain f).symm = Perm.extendDomain e.symm f :=
rfl
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_symm Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_symm
theorem Perm.extendDomain_trans (e e' : Perm α') :
(e.extendDomain f).trans (e'.extendDomain f) = Perm.extendDomain (e.trans e') f := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, permCongr_trans]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_trans Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_trans
end
/-- Subtype of the quotient is equivalent to the quotient of the subtype. Let `α` be a setoid with
equivalence relation `~`. Let `p₂` be a predicate on the quotient type `α/~`, and `p₁` be the lift
of this predicate to `α`: `p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧`. Let `~₂` be the restriction of `~` to `{x // p₁ x}`.
Then `{x // p₂ x}` is equivalent to the quotient of `{x // p₁ x}` by `~₂`. -/
def subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype (p₁ : α → Prop) {s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)}
(p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂.r x y ↔ s₁.r x y) : {x // p₂ x} ≃ Quotient s₂ where
toFun a :=
Quotient.hrecOn a.1 (fun a h => ⟦⟨a, (hp₂ _).2 h⟩⟧)
(fun a b hab => hfunext (by rw [Quotient.sound hab]) fun h₁ h₂ _ =>
heq_of_eq (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).2 hab)))
a.2
invFun a :=
Quotient.liftOn a (fun a => (⟨⟦a.1⟧, (hp₂ _).1 a.2⟩ : { x // p₂ x })) fun a b hab =>
Subtype.ext_val (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).1 hab))
left_inv := by exact fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn a (fun b hb => rfl) ha
right_inv a := Quotient.inductionOn a fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, @Setoid.r _ s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y)
(x hx) : subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h ⟨⟦x⟧, hx⟩ = ⟦⟨x, (hp₂ _).2 hx⟩⟧ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype_mk Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, @Setoid.r _ s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y) (x) :
(subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h).symm ⟦x⟧ = ⟨⟦x⟧, (hp₂ _).1 x.property⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype_symm_mk Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- A helper function for `Equiv.swap`. -/
def swapCore (a b r : α) : α :=
if r = a then b else if r = b then a else r
#align equiv.swap_core Equiv.swapCore
theorem swapCore_self (r a : α) : swapCore a a r = r := by
unfold swapCore
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
#align equiv.swap_core_self Equiv.swapCore_self
theorem swapCore_swapCore (r a b : α) : swapCore a b (swapCore a b r) = r := by
unfold swapCore
-- Porting note: cc missing.
-- `casesm` would work here, with `casesm _ = _, ¬ _ = _`,
-- if it would just continue past failures on hypotheses matching the pattern
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅
· subst h₁; exact h₂
· subst h₁; rfl
· cases h₃ rfl
· exact h₄.symm
· cases h₅ rfl
· cases h₅ rfl
· rfl
#align equiv.swap_core_swap_core Equiv.swapCore_swapCore
theorem swapCore_comm (r a b : α) : swapCore a b r = swapCore b a r := by
unfold swapCore
-- Porting note: whatever solution works for `swapCore_swapCore` will work here too.
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ <;> try simp
· cases h₁; cases h₂; rfl
#align equiv.swap_core_comm Equiv.swapCore_comm
/-- `swap a b` is the permutation that swaps `a` and `b` and
leaves other values as is. -/
def swap (a b : α) : Perm α :=
⟨swapCore a b, swapCore a b, fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b,
fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b⟩
#align equiv.swap Equiv.swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_self (a : α) : swap a a = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun r => swapCore_self r a
#align equiv.swap_self Equiv.swap_self
theorem swap_comm (a b : α) : swap a b = swap b a :=
ext fun r => swapCore_comm r _ _
#align equiv.swap_comm Equiv.swap_comm
theorem swap_apply_def (a b x : α) : swap a b x = if x = a then b else if x = b then a else x :=
rfl
#align equiv.swap_apply_def Equiv.swap_apply_def
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_left (a b : α) : swap a b a = b :=
if_pos rfl
#align equiv.swap_apply_left Equiv.swap_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_right (a b : α) : swap a b b = a := by
by_cases h:b = a <;> simp [swap_apply_def, h]
#align equiv.swap_apply_right Equiv.swap_apply_right
theorem swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne {a b x : α} : x ≠ a → x ≠ b → swap a b x = x := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [swap_apply_def]
#align equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne
theorem eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self {a b x : α} (h : swap a b x ≠ x) : x = a ∨ x = b := by
contrapose! h
exact swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h.1 h.2
@[simp]
theorem swap_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).trans (swap a b) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun _ => swapCore_swapCore _ _ _
#align equiv.swap_swap Equiv.swap_swap
@[simp]
theorem symm_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).symm = swap a b :=
rfl
#align equiv.symm_swap Equiv.symm_swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_eq_refl_iff {x y : α} : swap x y = Equiv.refl _ ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => (Equiv.refl _).injective ?_, fun h => h ▸ swap_self _⟩
rw [← h, swap_apply_left, h, refl_apply]
#align equiv.swap_eq_refl_iff Equiv.swap_eq_refl_iff
theorem swap_comp_apply {a b x : α} (π : Perm α) :
π.trans (swap a b) x = if π x = a then b else if π x = b then a else π x := by
cases π
rfl
#align equiv.swap_comp_apply Equiv.swap_comp_apply
theorem swap_eq_update (i j : α) : (Equiv.swap i j : α → α) = update (update id j i) i j :=
funext fun x => by rw [update_apply _ i j, update_apply _ j i, Equiv.swap_apply_def, id]
#align equiv.swap_eq_update Equiv.swap_eq_update
theorem comp_swap_eq_update (i j : α) (f : α → β) :
f ∘ Equiv.swap i j = update (update f j (f i)) i (f j) := by
rw [swap_eq_update, comp_update, comp_update, comp_id]
#align equiv.comp_swap_eq_update Equiv.comp_swap_eq_update
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_swap_trans [DecidableEq β] (a b : α) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.symm.trans (swap a b)).trans e = swap (e a) (e b) :=
Equiv.ext fun x => by
have : ∀ a, e.symm x = a ↔ x = e a := fun a => by
rw [@eq_comm _ (e.symm x)]
constructor <;> intros <;> simp_all
simp only [trans_apply, swap_apply_def, this]
split_ifs <;> simp
#align equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans
@[simp]
theorem trans_swap_trans_symm [DecidableEq β] (a b : β) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.trans (swap a b)).trans e.symm = swap (e.symm a) (e.symm b) :=
symm_trans_swap_trans a b e.symm
#align equiv.trans_swap_trans_symm Equiv.trans_swap_trans_symm
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_self (i j a : α) : swap i j (swap i j a) = a := by
rw [← Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.swap_swap, Equiv.refl_apply]
#align equiv.swap_apply_self Equiv.swap_apply_self
/-- A function is invariant to a swap if it is equal at both elements -/
theorem apply_swap_eq_self {v : α → β} {i j : α} (hv : v i = v j) (k : α) :
v (swap i j k) = v k := by
by_cases hi : k = i
· rw [hi, swap_apply_left, hv]
by_cases hj : k = j
· rw [hj, swap_apply_right, hv]
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hi hj]
#align equiv.apply_swap_eq_self Equiv.apply_swap_eq_self
theorem swap_apply_eq_iff {x y z w : α} : swap x y z = w ↔ z = swap x y w := by
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, symm_swap]
#align equiv.swap_apply_eq_iff Equiv.swap_apply_eq_iff
theorem swap_apply_ne_self_iff {a b x : α} : swap a b x ≠ x ↔ a ≠ b ∧ (x = a ∨ x = b) := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
by_cases hax : x = a
· simp [hax, eq_comm]
by_cases hbx : x = b
· simp [hbx]
simp [hab, hax, hbx, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
#align equiv.swap_apply_ne_self_iff Equiv.swap_apply_ne_self_iff
namespace Perm
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_swap_refl {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : α) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.swap i j) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inl, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inl.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_swap_refl Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_swap_refl
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_refl_swap {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : β) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.swap i j) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inr, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inr.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_refl_swap Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_refl_swap
end Perm
/-- Augment an equivalence with a prescribed mapping `f a = b` -/
def setValue (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : α ≃ β :=
(swap a (f.symm b)).trans f
#align equiv.set_value Equiv.setValue
@[simp]
theorem setValue_eq (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : setValue f a b a = b := by
simp [setValue, swap_apply_left]
#align equiv.set_value_eq Equiv.setValue_eq
end Swap
end Equiv
namespace Function.Involutive
/-- Convert an involutive function `f` to a permutation with `toFun = invFun = f`. -/
def toPerm (f : α → α) (h : Involutive f) : Equiv.Perm α :=
⟨f, f, h.leftInverse, h.rightInverse⟩
#align function.involutive.to_perm Function.Involutive.toPerm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toPerm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f : α → α) = f :=
rfl
#align function.involutive.coe_to_perm Function.Involutive.coe_toPerm
@[simp]
theorem toPerm_symm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f).symm = h.toPerm f :=
rfl
#align function.involutive.to_perm_symm Function.Involutive.toPerm_symm
theorem toPerm_involutive {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : Involutive (h.toPerm f) :=
h
#align function.involutive.to_perm_involutive Function.Involutive.toPerm_involutive
end Function.Involutive
theorem PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq {x : PLift α} {y : α} : x = PLift.up y ↔ x.down = y :=
Equiv.plift.eq_symm_apply
#align plift.eq_up_iff_down_eq PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq
theorem Function.Injective.map_swap [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (x y z : α) :
f (Equiv.swap x y z) = Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
conv_rhs => rw [Equiv.swap_apply_def]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [hf h₁, Equiv.swap_apply_left]
· rw [hf h₂, Equiv.swap_apply_right]
· rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (mt (congr_arg f) h₁) (mt (congr_arg f) h₂)]
#align function.injective.map_swap Function.Injective.map_swap
namespace Equiv
section
variable (P : α → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/-- Transport dependent functions through an equivalence of the base space.
-/
@[simps]
def piCongrLeft' (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) : (∀ a, P a) ≃ ∀ b, P (e.symm b) where
toFun f x := f (e.symm x)
invFun f x := (e.symm_apply_apply x).ndrec (f (e x))
left_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), h.ndrec (f y) = f x) (e.symm_apply_apply x)
right_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), (congr_arg e.symm h).ndrec (f y) = f x)
(e.apply_symm_apply x)
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left' Equiv.piCongrLeft'
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left'_apply Equiv.piCongrLeft'_apply
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left'_symm_apply Equiv.piCongrLeft'_symm_apply
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e.symm (e a) = a` in the statement of this lemma. -/
add_decl_doc Equiv.piCongrLeft'_symm_apply
/-- This lemma is impractical to state in the dependent case. -/
@[simp]
theorem piCongrLeft'_symm (P : Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) :
(piCongrLeft' (fun _ => P) e).symm = piCongrLeft' _ e.symm := by ext; simp [piCongrLeft']
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `a` is of the form `e.symm b`, so we can use `g b` instead of
`g (e (e.symm b))`. -/
lemma piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) (g : ∀ b, P (e.symm b)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g (e.symm b) = g b := by
change Eq.ndrec _ _ = _
generalize_proofs hZa
revert hZa
rw [e.apply_symm_apply b]
simp
end
section
variable (P : β → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/-- Transporting dependent functions through an equivalence of the base,
expressed as a "simplification".
-/
def piCongrLeft : (∀ a, P (e a)) ≃ ∀ b, P b :=
(piCongrLeft' P e.symm).symm
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left Equiv.piCongrLeft
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e (e.symm b) = b` in the statement of this lemma. -/
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f b = e.apply_symm_apply b ▸ f (e.symm b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_symm_apply (g : ∀ b, P b) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e).symm g a = g (e a) :=
piCongrLeft'_apply P e.symm g a
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `b` is of the form `e a`, so we can use `f a` instead of
`f (e.symm (e a))`. -/
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f (e a) = f a :=
piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply P e.symm f a
open Sum
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast {P : β → Sort v} {e : α ≃ β}
(f : (a : α) → P (e a)) (b : β) :
piCongrLeft P e f b = cast (congr_arg P (e.apply_symm_apply b)) (f (e.symm b)) :=
Eq.rec_eq_cast _ _
theorem piCongrLeft_sum_inl (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (i : ι) :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inl i)) = f i := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inl i)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
theorem piCongrLeft_sum_inr (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (j : ι') :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inr j)) = g j := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inr j)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
end
section
variable {W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : ∀ a : α, W a ≃ Z (h₁ a))
/-- Transport dependent functions through
an equivalence of the base spaces and a family
of equivalences of the matching fibers.
-/
def piCongr : (∀ a, W a) ≃ ∀ b, Z b :=
(Equiv.piCongrRight h₂).trans (Equiv.piCongrLeft _ h₁)
#align equiv.Pi_congr Equiv.piCongr
@[simp]
theorem coe_piCongr_symm : ((h₁.piCongr h₂).symm :
(∀ b, Z b) → ∀ a, W a) = fun f a => (h₂ a).symm (f (h₁ a)) :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_Pi_congr_symm Equiv.coe_piCongr_symm
theorem piCongr_symm_apply (f : ∀ b, Z b) :
(h₁.piCongr h₂).symm f = fun a => (h₂ a).symm (f (h₁ a)) :=
rfl
#align equiv.Pi_congr_symm_apply Equiv.piCongr_symm_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Basic.lean | 1,951 | 1,952 | theorem piCongr_apply_apply (f : ∀ a, W a) (a : α) : h₁.piCongr h₂ f (h₁ a) = h₂ a (f a) := by |
simp only [piCongr, piCongrRight, trans_apply, coe_fn_mk, piCongrLeft_apply_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import algebra.invertible from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"722b3b152ddd5e0cf21c0a29787c76596cb6b422"
/-!
# Invertible elements
This file defines a typeclass `Invertible a` for elements `a` with a two-sided
multiplicative inverse.
The intent of the typeclass is to provide a way to write e.g. `⅟2` in a ring
like `ℤ[1/2]` where some inverses exist but there is no general `⁻¹` operator;
or to specify that a field has characteristic `≠ 2`.
It is the `Type`-valued analogue to the `Prop`-valued `IsUnit`.
For constructions of the invertible element given a characteristic, see
`Algebra/CharP/Invertible` and other lemmas in that file.
## Notation
* `⅟a` is `Invertible.invOf a`, the inverse of `a`
## Implementation notes
The `Invertible` class lives in `Type`, not `Prop`, to make computation easier.
If multiplication is associative, `Invertible` is a subsingleton anyway.
The `simp` normal form tries to normalize `⅟a` to `a ⁻¹`. Otherwise, it pushes
`⅟` inside the expression as much as possible.
Since `Invertible a` is not a `Prop` (but it is a `Subsingleton`), we have to be careful about
coherence issues: we should avoid having multiple non-defeq instances for `Invertible a` in the
same context. This file plays it safe and uses `def` rather than `instance` for most definitions,
users can choose which instances to use at the point of use.
For example, here's how you can use an `Invertible 1` instance:
```lean
variable {α : Type*} [Monoid α]
def something_that_needs_inverses (x : α) [Invertible x] := sorry
section
attribute [local instance] invertibleOne
def something_one := something_that_needs_inverses 1
end
```
### Typeclass search vs. unification for `simp` lemmas
Note that since typeclass search searches the local context first, an instance argument like
`[Invertible a]` might sometimes be filled by a different term than the one we'd find by
unification (i.e., the one that's used as an implicit argument to `⅟`).
This can cause issues with `simp`. Therefore, some lemmas are duplicated, with the `@[simp]`
versions using unification and the user-facing ones using typeclass search.
Since unification can make backwards rewriting (e.g. `rw [← mylemma]`) impractical, we still want
the instance-argument versions; therefore the user-facing versions retain the instance arguments
and the original lemma name, whereas the `@[simp]`/unification ones acquire a `'` at the end of
their name.
We modify this file according to the above pattern only as needed; therefore, most `@[simp]` lemmas
here are not part of such a duplicate pair. This is not (yet) intended as a permanent solution.
See Zulip: [https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Invertible.201.20simps/near/320558233]
## Tags
invertible, inverse element, invOf, a half, one half, a third, one third, ½, ⅓
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- `Invertible a` gives a two-sided multiplicative inverse of `a`. -/
class Invertible [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) : Type u where
/-- The inverse of an `Invertible` element -/
invOf : α
/-- `invOf a` is a left inverse of `a` -/
invOf_mul_self : invOf * a = 1
/-- `invOf a` is a right inverse of `a` -/
mul_invOf_self : a * invOf = 1
#align invertible Invertible
/-- The inverse of an `Invertible` element -/
prefix:max
"⅟" =>-- This notation has the same precedence as `Inv.inv`.
Invertible.invOf
@[simp]
theorem invOf_mul_self' [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) {_ : Invertible a} : ⅟ a * a = 1 :=
Invertible.invOf_mul_self
theorem invOf_mul_self [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) [Invertible a] : ⅟ a * a = 1 :=
Invertible.invOf_mul_self
#align inv_of_mul_self invOf_mul_self
@[simp]
theorem mul_invOf_self' [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) {_ : Invertible a} : a * ⅟ a = 1 :=
Invertible.mul_invOf_self
theorem mul_invOf_self [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) [Invertible a] : a * ⅟ a = 1 :=
Invertible.mul_invOf_self
#align mul_inv_of_self mul_invOf_self
@[simp]
theorem invOf_mul_self_assoc' [Monoid α] (a b : α) {_ : Invertible a} : ⅟ a * (a * b) = b := by
rw [← mul_assoc, invOf_mul_self, one_mul]
theorem invOf_mul_self_assoc [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible a] : ⅟ a * (a * b) = b := by
rw [← mul_assoc, invOf_mul_self, one_mul]
#align inv_of_mul_self_assoc invOf_mul_self_assoc
@[simp]
theorem mul_invOf_self_assoc' [Monoid α] (a b : α) {_ : Invertible a} : a * (⅟ a * b) = b := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_invOf_self, one_mul]
theorem mul_invOf_self_assoc [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible a] : a * (⅟ a * b) = b := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_invOf_self, one_mul]
#align mul_inv_of_self_assoc mul_invOf_self_assoc
@[simp]
theorem mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel' [Monoid α] (a b : α) {_ : Invertible b} : a * ⅟ b * b = a := by
simp [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible b] : a * ⅟ b * b = a := by
simp [mul_assoc]
#align mul_inv_of_mul_self_cancel mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel
@[simp]
theorem mul_mul_invOf_self_cancel' [Monoid α] (a b : α) {_ : Invertible b} : a * b * ⅟ b = a := by
simp [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_mul_invOf_self_cancel [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible b] : a * b * ⅟ b = a := by
simp [mul_assoc]
#align mul_mul_inv_of_self_cancel mul_mul_invOf_self_cancel
theorem invOf_eq_right_inv [Monoid α] {a b : α} [Invertible a] (hac : a * b = 1) : ⅟ a = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (invOf_mul_self _) hac
#align inv_of_eq_right_inv invOf_eq_right_inv
theorem invOf_eq_left_inv [Monoid α] {a b : α} [Invertible a] (hac : b * a = 1) : ⅟ a = b :=
(left_inv_eq_right_inv hac (mul_invOf_self _)).symm
#align inv_of_eq_left_inv invOf_eq_left_inv
theorem invertible_unique {α : Type u} [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible a] [Invertible b]
(h : a = b) : ⅟ a = ⅟ b := by
apply invOf_eq_right_inv
rw [h, mul_invOf_self]
#align invertible_unique invertible_unique
instance Invertible.subsingleton [Monoid α] (a : α) : Subsingleton (Invertible a) :=
⟨fun ⟨b, hba, hab⟩ ⟨c, _, hac⟩ => by
congr
exact left_inv_eq_right_inv hba hac⟩
#align invertible.subsingleton Invertible.subsingleton
/-- If `a` is invertible and `a = b`, then `⅟a = ⅟b`. -/
@[congr]
theorem Invertible.congr [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible a] [Invertible b] (h : a = b) :
⅟a = ⅟b := by subst h; congr; apply Subsingleton.allEq
/-- If `r` is invertible and `s = r` and `si = ⅟r`, then `s` is invertible with `⅟s = si`. -/
def Invertible.copy' [MulOneClass α] {r : α} (hr : Invertible r) (s : α) (si : α) (hs : s = r)
(hsi : si = ⅟ r) : Invertible s where
invOf := si
invOf_mul_self := by rw [hs, hsi, invOf_mul_self]
mul_invOf_self := by rw [hs, hsi, mul_invOf_self]
#align invertible.copy' Invertible.copy'
/-- If `r` is invertible and `s = r`, then `s` is invertible. -/
abbrev Invertible.copy [MulOneClass α] {r : α} (hr : Invertible r) (s : α) (hs : s = r) :
Invertible s :=
hr.copy' _ _ hs rfl
#align invertible.copy Invertible.copy
/-- Each element of a group is invertible. -/
def invertibleOfGroup [Group α] (a : α) : Invertible a :=
⟨a⁻¹, inv_mul_self a, mul_inv_self a⟩
#align invertible_of_group invertibleOfGroup
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_group_inv [Group α] (a : α) [Invertible a] : ⅟ a = a⁻¹ :=
invOf_eq_right_inv (mul_inv_self a)
#align inv_of_eq_group_inv invOf_eq_group_inv
/-- `1` is the inverse of itself -/
def invertibleOne [Monoid α] : Invertible (1 : α) :=
⟨1, mul_one _, one_mul _⟩
#align invertible_one invertibleOne
@[simp]
theorem invOf_one' [Monoid α] {_ : Invertible (1 : α)} : ⅟ (1 : α) = 1 :=
invOf_eq_right_inv (mul_one _)
theorem invOf_one [Monoid α] [Invertible (1 : α)] : ⅟ (1 : α) = 1 :=
invOf_eq_right_inv (mul_one _)
#align inv_of_one invOf_one
/-- `a` is the inverse of `⅟a`. -/
instance invertibleInvOf [One α] [Mul α] {a : α} [Invertible a] : Invertible (⅟ a) :=
⟨a, mul_invOf_self a, invOf_mul_self a⟩
#align invertible_inv_of invertibleInvOf
@[simp]
theorem invOf_invOf [Monoid α] (a : α) [Invertible a] [Invertible (⅟ a)] : ⅟ (⅟ a) = a :=
invOf_eq_right_inv (invOf_mul_self _)
#align inv_of_inv_of invOf_invOf
@[simp]
theorem invOf_inj [Monoid α] {a b : α} [Invertible a] [Invertible b] : ⅟ a = ⅟ b ↔ a = b :=
⟨invertible_unique _ _, invertible_unique _ _⟩
#align inv_of_inj invOf_inj
/-- `⅟b * ⅟a` is the inverse of `a * b` -/
def invertibleMul [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible a] [Invertible b] : Invertible (a * b) :=
⟨⅟ b * ⅟ a, by simp [← mul_assoc], by simp [← mul_assoc]⟩
#align invertible_mul invertibleMul
@[simp]
theorem invOf_mul [Monoid α] (a b : α) [Invertible a] [Invertible b] [Invertible (a * b)] :
⅟ (a * b) = ⅟ b * ⅟ a :=
invOf_eq_right_inv (by simp [← mul_assoc])
#align inv_of_mul invOf_mul
/-- A copy of `invertibleMul` for dot notation. -/
abbrev Invertible.mul [Monoid α] {a b : α} (_ : Invertible a) (_ : Invertible b) :
Invertible (a * b) :=
invertibleMul _ _
#align invertible.mul Invertible.mul
section
variable [Monoid α] {a b c : α} [Invertible c]
variable (c) in
theorem mul_right_inj_of_invertible : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using congr_arg (· * ⅟c) h, congr_arg (· * _)⟩
variable (c) in
theorem mul_left_inj_of_invertible : c * a = c * b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using congr_arg (⅟c * ·) h, congr_arg (_ * ·)⟩
theorem invOf_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_left : ⅟c * a = b ↔ a = c * b := by
rw [← mul_left_inj_of_invertible (c := c), mul_invOf_self_assoc]
theorem mul_left_eq_iff_eq_invOf_mul : c * a = b ↔ a = ⅟c * b := by
rw [← mul_left_inj_of_invertible (c := ⅟c), invOf_mul_self_assoc]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Invertible/Defs.lean | 259 | 260 | theorem mul_invOf_eq_iff_eq_mul_right : a * ⅟c = b ↔ a = b * c := by |
rw [← mul_right_inj_of_invertible (c := c), mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.IdealOperations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
#align_import algebra.lie.normalizer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"938fead7abdc0cbbca8eba7a1052865a169dc102"
/-!
# The normalizer of Lie submodules and subalgebras.
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie subalgebra `L`, the normalizer of a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` is
the Lie submodule with underlying set `{ m | ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N }`.
The lattice of Lie submodules thus has two natural operations, the normalizer: `N ↦ N.normalizer`
and the ideal operation: `N ↦ ⁅⊤, N⁆`; these are adjoint, i.e., they form a Galois connection. This
adjointness is the reason that we may define nilpotency in terms of either the upper or lower
central series.
Given a Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L`, we may regard `H` as a Lie submodule of `L` over `H`, and thus
consider the normalizer. This turns out to be a Lie subalgebra.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule.normalizer`
* `LieSubalgebra.normalizer`
* `LieSubmodule.gc_top_lie_normalizer`
## Tags
lie algebra, normalizer
-/
variable {R L M M' : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] [LieModule R L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (N : LieSubmodule R L M) {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M}
/-- The normalizer of a Lie submodule.
See also `LieSubmodule.idealizer`. -/
def normalizer : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := {m | ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N}
add_mem' hm₁ hm₂ x := by rw [lie_add]; exact N.add_mem' (hm₁ x) (hm₂ x)
zero_mem' x := by simp
smul_mem' t m hm x := by rw [lie_smul]; exact N.smul_mem' t (hm x)
lie_mem {x m} hm y := by rw [leibniz_lie]; exact N.add_mem' (hm ⁅y, x⁆) (N.lie_mem (hm y))
#align lie_submodule.normalizer LieSubmodule.normalizer
@[simp]
theorem mem_normalizer (m : M) : m ∈ N.normalizer ↔ ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_normalizer LieSubmodule.mem_normalizer
@[simp]
theorem le_normalizer : N ≤ N.normalizer := by
intro m hm
rw [mem_normalizer]
exact fun x => N.lie_mem hm
#align lie_submodule.le_normalizer LieSubmodule.le_normalizer
theorem normalizer_inf : (N₁ ⊓ N₂).normalizer = N₁.normalizer ⊓ N₂.normalizer := by
ext; simp [← forall_and]
#align lie_submodule.normalizer_inf LieSubmodule.normalizer_inf
@[mono]
theorem monotone_normalizer : Monotone (normalizer : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M) := by
intro N₁ N₂ h m hm
rw [mem_normalizer] at hm ⊢
exact fun x => h (hm x)
#align lie_submodule.monotone_normalizer LieSubmodule.monotone_normalizer
@[simp]
theorem comap_normalizer (f : M' →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M) : N.normalizer.comap f = (N.comap f).normalizer := by
ext; simp
#align lie_submodule.comap_normalizer LieSubmodule.comap_normalizer
theorem top_lie_le_iff_le_normalizer (N' : LieSubmodule R L M) :
⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N'.normalizer := by rw [lie_le_iff]; tauto
#align lie_submodule.top_lie_le_iff_le_normalizer LieSubmodule.top_lie_le_iff_le_normalizer
theorem gc_top_lie_normalizer :
GaloisConnection (fun N : LieSubmodule R L M => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆) normalizer :=
top_lie_le_iff_le_normalizer
#align lie_submodule.gc_top_lie_normalizer LieSubmodule.gc_top_lie_normalizer
variable (R L M) in
theorem normalizer_bot_eq_maxTrivSubmodule :
(⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).normalizer = LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule R L M :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.normalizer_bot_eq_max_triv_submodule LieSubmodule.normalizer_bot_eq_maxTrivSubmodule
/-- The idealizer of a Lie submodule.
See also `LieSubmodule.normalizer`. -/
def idealizer : LieIdeal R L where
carrier := {x : L | ∀ m : M, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N}
add_mem' := fun {x} {y} hx hy m ↦ by rw [add_lie]; exact N.add_mem (hx m) (hy m)
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := fun t {x} hx m ↦ by rw [smul_lie]; exact N.smul_mem t (hx m)
lie_mem := fun {x} {y} hy m ↦ by rw [lie_lie]; exact sub_mem (N.lie_mem (hy m)) (hy ⁅x, m⁆)
@[simp]
lemma mem_idealizer {x : L} : x ∈ N.idealizer ↔ ∀ m : M, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.LieIdeal.idealizer_eq_normalizer (I : LieIdeal R L) :
I.idealizer = I.normalizer := by
ext x; exact forall_congr' fun y ↦ by simp only [← lie_skew x y, neg_mem_iff]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable (H : LieSubalgebra R L)
/-- Regarding a Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L` as a module over itself, its normalizer is in fact a Lie
subalgebra. -/
def normalizer : LieSubalgebra R L :=
{ H.toLieSubmodule.normalizer with
lie_mem' := fun {y z} hy hz x => by
rw [coe_bracket_of_module, mem_toLieSubmodule, leibniz_lie, ← lie_skew y, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact H.sub_mem (hz ⟨_, hy x⟩) (hy ⟨_, hz x⟩) }
#align lie_subalgebra.normalizer LieSubalgebra.normalizer
theorem mem_normalizer_iff' (x : L) : x ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ y : L, y ∈ H → ⁅y, x⁆ ∈ H := by
rw [Subtype.forall']; rfl
#align lie_subalgebra.mem_normalizer_iff' LieSubalgebra.mem_normalizer_iff'
theorem mem_normalizer_iff (x : L) : x ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ y : L, y ∈ H → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ H := by
rw [mem_normalizer_iff']
refine forall₂_congr fun y hy => ?_
rw [← lie_skew, neg_mem_iff (G := L)]
#align lie_subalgebra.mem_normalizer_iff LieSubalgebra.mem_normalizer_iff
theorem le_normalizer : H ≤ H.normalizer :=
H.toLieSubmodule.le_normalizer
#align lie_subalgebra.le_normalizer LieSubalgebra.le_normalizer
theorem coe_normalizer_eq_normalizer :
(H.toLieSubmodule.normalizer : Submodule R L) = H.normalizer :=
rfl
#align lie_subalgebra.coe_normalizer_eq_normalizer LieSubalgebra.coe_normalizer_eq_normalizer
variable {H}
theorem lie_mem_sup_of_mem_normalizer {x y z : L} (hx : x ∈ H.normalizer) (hy : y ∈ (R ∙ x) ⊔ ↑H)
(hz : z ∈ (R ∙ x) ⊔ ↑H) : ⁅y, z⁆ ∈ (R ∙ x) ⊔ ↑H := by
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at hy hz
obtain ⟨u₁, hu₁, v, hv : v ∈ H, rfl⟩ := hy
obtain ⟨u₂, hu₂, w, hw : w ∈ H, rfl⟩ := hz
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hu₁
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hu₂
apply Submodule.mem_sup_right
simp only [LieSubalgebra.mem_coe_submodule, smul_lie, add_lie, zero_add, lie_add, smul_zero,
lie_smul, lie_self]
refine H.add_mem (H.smul_mem s ?_) (H.add_mem (H.smul_mem t ?_) (H.lie_mem hv hw))
exacts [(H.mem_normalizer_iff' x).mp hx v hv, (H.mem_normalizer_iff x).mp hx w hw]
#align lie_subalgebra.lie_mem_sup_of_mem_normalizer LieSubalgebra.lie_mem_sup_of_mem_normalizer
/-- A Lie subalgebra is an ideal of its normalizer. -/
theorem ideal_in_normalizer {x y : L} (hx : x ∈ H.normalizer) (hy : y ∈ H) : ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ H := by
rw [← lie_skew, neg_mem_iff (G := L)]
exact hx ⟨y, hy⟩
#align lie_subalgebra.ideal_in_normalizer LieSubalgebra.ideal_in_normalizer
/-- A Lie subalgebra `H` is an ideal of any Lie subalgebra `K` containing `H` and contained in the
normalizer of `H`. -/
theorem exists_nested_lieIdeal_ofLe_normalizer {K : LieSubalgebra R L} (h₁ : H ≤ K)
(h₂ : K ≤ H.normalizer) : ∃ I : LieIdeal R K, (I : LieSubalgebra R K) = ofLe h₁ := by
rw [exists_nested_lieIdeal_coe_eq_iff]
exact fun x y hx hy => ideal_in_normalizer (h₂ hx) hy
#align lie_subalgebra.exists_nested_lie_ideal_of_le_normalizer LieSubalgebra.exists_nested_lieIdeal_ofLe_normalizer
variable (H)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Normalizer.lean | 185 | 203 | theorem normalizer_eq_self_iff :
H.normalizer = H ↔ (LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule R H <| L ⧸ H.toLieSubmodule) = ⊥ := by |
rw [LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => le_antisymm ?_ H.le_normalizer⟩
· rintro ⟨x⟩ hx
suffices x ∈ H by rwa [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero,
coe_toLieSubmodule, mem_coe_submodule]
rw [← h, H.mem_normalizer_iff']
intro y hy
replace hx : ⁅_, LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk' _ x⁆ = 0 := hx ⟨y, hy⟩
rwa [← LieModuleHom.map_lie, LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero] at hx
· intro x hx
let y := LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk' H.toLieSubmodule x
have hy : y ∈ LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule R H (L ⧸ H.toLieSubmodule) := by
rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [← LieModuleHom.map_lie, LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero, coe_bracket_of_module,
Submodule.coe_mk, mem_toLieSubmodule]
exact (H.mem_normalizer_iff' x).mp hx z hz
simpa [y] using h y hy
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
#align_import data.polynomial.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The main defs here are `eval₂`, `eval`, and `map`.
We give several lemmas about their interaction with each other and with module operations.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar ring
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target -/
irreducible_def eval₂ (p : R[X]) : S :=
p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e
#align polynomial.eval₂ Polynomial.eval₂
theorem eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval₂_def]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum
theorem eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {f g : R →+* S} {s t : S}
{φ ψ : R[X]} : f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ := by
rintro rfl rfl rfl; rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_congr Polynomial.eval₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero,
mul_one, sum, Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff,
RingHom.map_zero, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_zero Polynomial.eval₂_at_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 0 := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_zero Polynomial.eval₂_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_C Polynomial.eval₂_C
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X Polynomial.eval₂_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = f r * x ^ n := by
simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_monomial Polynomial.eval₂_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n).eval₂ f x = x ^ n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial]
convert eval₂_monomial f x (n := n) (r := 1)
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_pow Polynomial.eval₂_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum]
apply sum_add_index <;> simp [add_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_add Polynomial.eval₂_add
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_one : (1 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 1 := by rw [← C_1, eval₂_C, f.map_one]
#align polynomial.eval₂_one Polynomial.eval₂_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval₂ f x = bit0 (p.eval₂ f x) := by rw [bit0, eval₂_add, bit0]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit0 Polynomial.eval₂_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval₂ f x = bit1 (p.eval₂ f x) := by
rw [bit1, eval₂_add, eval₂_bit0, eval₂_one, bit1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit1 Polynomial.eval₂_bit1
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_smul (g : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (x : S) {s : R} :
eval₂ g x (s • p) = g s * eval₂ g x p := by
have A : p.natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := Nat.lt_succ_self _
have B : (s • p).natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := (natDegree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt A
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_over_range' _ _ _ A, sum_over_range' _ _ _ B] <;>
simp [mul_sum, mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.eval₂_smul Polynomial.eval₂_smul
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C_X : eval₂ C X p = p :=
Polynomial.induction_on' p (fun p q hp hq => by simp [hp, hq]) fun n x => by
rw [eval₂_monomial, ← smul_X_eq_monomial, C_mul']
#align polynomial.eval₂_C_X Polynomial.eval₂_C_X
/-- `eval₂AddMonoidHom (f : R →+* S) (x : S)` is the `AddMonoidHom` from
`R[X]` to `S` obtained by evaluating the pushforward of `p` along `f` at `x`. -/
@[simps]
def eval₂AddMonoidHom : R[X] →+ S where
toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom_apply Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).eval₂ f x = n := by
induction' n with n ih
-- Porting note: `Nat.zero_eq` is required.
· simp only [eval₂_zero, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· rw [n.cast_succ, eval₂_add, ih, eval₂_one, n.cast_succ]
#align polynomial.eval₂_nat_cast Polynomial.eval₂_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval₂_nat_cast := eval₂_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
lemma eval₂_ofNat {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (f : R →+* S) (a : S) :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R[X])).eval₂ f a = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp [OfNat.ofNat]
variable [Semiring T]
theorem eval₂_sum (p : T[X]) (g : ℕ → T → R[X]) (x : S) :
(p.sum g).eval₂ f x = p.sum fun n a => (g n a).eval₂ f x := by
let T : R[X] →+ S :=
{ toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' := fun p q => eval₂_add _ _ }
have A : ∀ y, eval₂ f x y = T y := fun y => rfl
simp only [A]
rw [sum, map_sum, sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_sum Polynomial.eval₂_sum
theorem eval₂_list_sum (l : List R[X]) (x : S) : eval₂ f x l.sum = (l.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_list_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) l
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_sum Polynomial.eval₂_list_sum
theorem eval₂_multiset_sum (s : Multiset R[X]) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x s.sum = (s.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) s
#align polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum
theorem eval₂_finset_sum (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R[X]) (x : S) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).eval₂ f x = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).eval₂ f x :=
map_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum
theorem eval₂_ofFinsupp {f : R →+* S} {x : S} {p : R[ℕ]} :
eval₂ f x (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = liftNC (↑f) (powersHom S x) p := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, toFinsupp_sum, support, coeff]
rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_of_finsupp Polynomial.eval₂_ofFinsupp
theorem eval₂_mul_noncomm (hf : ∀ k, Commute (f <| q.coeff k) x) :
eval₂ f x (p * q) = eval₂ f x p * eval₂ f x q := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩; rcases q with ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff] at hf
simp only [← ofFinsupp_mul, eval₂_ofFinsupp]
exact liftNC_mul _ _ p q fun {k n} _hn => (hf k).pow_right n
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm Polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul_X : eval₂ f x (p * X) = eval₂ f x p * x := by
refine _root_.trans (eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun k => ?_) (by rw [eval₂_X])
rcases em (k = 1) with (rfl | hk)
· simp
· simp [coeff_X_of_ne_one hk]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_X Polynomial.eval₂_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_mul : eval₂ f x (X * p) = eval₂ f x p * x := by rw [X_mul, eval₂_mul_X]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_mul Polynomial.eval₂_X_mul
theorem eval₂_mul_C' (h : Commute (f a) x) : eval₂ f x (p * C a) = eval₂ f x p * f a := by
rw [eval₂_mul_noncomm, eval₂_C]
intro k
by_cases hk : k = 0
· simp only [hk, h, coeff_C_zero, coeff_C_ne_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero hk, RingHom.map_zero, Commute.zero_left]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_C' Polynomial.eval₂_mul_C'
theorem eval₂_list_prod_noncomm (ps : List R[X])
(hf : ∀ p ∈ ps, ∀ (k), Commute (f <| coeff p k) x) :
eval₂ f x ps.prod = (ps.map (Polynomial.eval₂ f x)).prod := by
induction' ps using List.reverseRecOn with ps p ihp
· simp
· simp only [List.forall_mem_append, List.forall_mem_singleton] at hf
simp [eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ hf.2, ihp hf.1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_prod_noncomm Polynomial.eval₂_list_prod_noncomm
/-- `eval₂` as a `RingHom` for noncommutative rings -/
@[simps]
def eval₂RingHom' (f : R →+* S) (x : S) (hf : ∀ a, Commute (f a) x) : R[X] →+* S where
toFun := eval₂ f x
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_mul' _p q := eval₂_mul_noncomm f x fun k => hf <| coeff q k
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_ring_hom' Polynomial.eval₂RingHom'
end
/-!
We next prove that eval₂ is multiplicative
as long as target ring is commutative
(even if the source ring is not).
-/
section Eval₂
section
variable [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
theorem eval₂_eq_sum_range :
p.eval₂ f x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (p.natDegree + 1), f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i :=
_root_.trans (congr_arg _ p.as_sum_range)
(_root_.trans (eval₂_finset_sum f _ _ x) (congr_arg _ (by simp)))
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range
theorem eval₂_eq_sum_range' (f : R →+* S) {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.natDegree < n) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x p = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i := by
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, p.sum_over_range' _ _ hn]
intro i
rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range' Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range'
end
section
variable [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul : (p * q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x * q.eval₂ f x :=
eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun _k => Commute.all _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul Polynomial.eval₂_mul
theorem eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left (q : R[X]) (hp : p.eval₂ f x = 0) : (p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [eval₂_mul f x]
exact mul_eq_zero_of_left hp (q.eval₂ f x)
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left Polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left
theorem eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right (p : R[X]) (hq : q.eval₂ f x = 0) : (p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [eval₂_mul f x]
exact mul_eq_zero_of_right (p.eval₂ f x) hq
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right Polynomial.eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right
/-- `eval₂` as a `RingHom` -/
def eval₂RingHom (f : R →+* S) (x : S) : R[X] →+* S :=
{ eval₂AddMonoidHom f x with
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _
map_mul' := fun _ _ => eval₂_mul _ _ }
#align polynomial.eval₂_ring_hom Polynomial.eval₂RingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_eval₂RingHom (f : R →+* S) (x) : ⇑(eval₂RingHom f x) = eval₂ f x :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_eval₂_ring_hom Polynomial.coe_eval₂RingHom
theorem eval₂_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x ^ n :=
(eval₂RingHom _ _).map_pow _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_pow Polynomial.eval₂_pow
theorem eval₂_dvd : p ∣ q → eval₂ f x p ∣ eval₂ f x q :=
(eval₂RingHom f x).map_dvd
#align polynomial.eval₂_dvd Polynomial.eval₂_dvd
theorem eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero (h : p ∣ q) (h0 : eval₂ f x p = 0) :
eval₂ f x q = 0 :=
zero_dvd_iff.mp (h0 ▸ eval₂_dvd f x h)
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero Polynomial.eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero
theorem eval₂_list_prod (l : List R[X]) (x : S) : eval₂ f x l.prod = (l.map (eval₂ f x)).prod :=
map_list_prod (eval₂RingHom f x) l
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_prod Polynomial.eval₂_list_prod
end
end Eval₂
section Eval
variable {x : R}
/-- `eval x p` is the evaluation of the polynomial `p` at `x` -/
def eval : R → R[X] → R :=
eval₂ (RingHom.id _)
#align polynomial.eval Polynomial.eval
theorem eval_eq_sum : p.eval x = p.sum fun e a => a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval, eval₂_eq_sum]
rfl
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum Polynomial.eval_eq_sum
theorem eval_eq_sum_range {p : R[X]} (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (p.natDegree + 1), p.coeff i * x ^ i := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, sum_over_range]; simp
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range
theorem eval_eq_sum_range' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.natDegree < n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, p.coeff i * x ^ i := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, p.sum_over_range' _ _ hn]; simp
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range' Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range'
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_apply {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (r : R) :
p.eval₂ f (f r) = f (p.eval r) := by
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval_eq_sum, sum, sum, map_sum f]
simp only [f.map_mul, f.map_pow]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_apply Polynomial.eval₂_at_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_one {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) : p.eval₂ f 1 = f (p.eval 1) := by
convert eval₂_at_apply (p := p) f 1
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_one Polynomial.eval₂_at_one
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_natCast {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) :
p.eval₂ f n = f (p.eval n) := by
convert eval₂_at_apply (p := p) f n
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_nat_cast Polynomial.eval₂_at_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval₂_at_nat_cast := eval₂_at_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_ofNat {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
p.eval₂ f (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = f (p.eval (OfNat.ofNat n)) := by
simp [OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem eval_C : (C a).eval x = a :=
eval₂_C _ _
#align polynomial.eval_C Polynomial.eval_C
@[simp]
theorem eval_natCast {n : ℕ} : (n : R[X]).eval x = n := by simp only [← C_eq_natCast, eval_C]
#align polynomial.eval_nat_cast Polynomial.eval_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_nat_cast := eval_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
lemma eval_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : R) :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R[X])).eval a = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp only [OfNat.ofNat, eval_natCast]
@[simp]
theorem eval_X : X.eval x = x :=
eval₂_X _ _
#align polynomial.eval_X Polynomial.eval_X
@[simp]
theorem eval_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).eval x = a * x ^ n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
#align polynomial.eval_monomial Polynomial.eval_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval x = 0 :=
eval₂_zero _ _
#align polynomial.eval_zero Polynomial.eval_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval_add : (p + q).eval x = p.eval x + q.eval x :=
eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.eval_add Polynomial.eval_add
@[simp]
theorem eval_one : (1 : R[X]).eval x = 1 :=
eval₂_one _ _
#align polynomial.eval_one Polynomial.eval_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval x = bit0 (p.eval x) :=
eval₂_bit0 _ _
#align polynomial.eval_bit0 Polynomial.eval_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval x = bit1 (p.eval x) :=
eval₂_bit1 _ _
#align polynomial.eval_bit1 Polynomial.eval_bit1
@[simp]
theorem eval_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S) (p : R[X])
(x : R) : (s • p).eval x = s • p.eval x := by
rw [← smul_one_smul R s p, eval, eval₂_smul, RingHom.id_apply, smul_one_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_smul Polynomial.eval_smul
@[simp]
theorem eval_C_mul : (C a * p).eval x = a * p.eval x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q ph qh =>
simp only [mul_add, eval_add, ph, qh]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp only [mul_assoc, C_mul_monomial, eval_monomial]
#align polynomial.eval_C_mul Polynomial.eval_C_mul
/-- A reformulation of the expansion of (1 + y)^d:
$$(d + 1) (1 + y)^d - (d + 1)y^d = \sum_{i = 0}^d {d + 1 \choose i} \cdot i \cdot y^{i - 1}.$$
-/
theorem eval_monomial_one_add_sub [CommRing S] (d : ℕ) (y : S) :
eval (1 + y) (monomial d (d + 1 : S)) - eval y (monomial d (d + 1 : S)) =
∑ x_1 ∈ range (d + 1), ↑((d + 1).choose x_1) * (↑x_1 * y ^ (x_1 - 1)) := by
have cast_succ : (d + 1 : S) = ((d.succ : ℕ) : S) := by simp only [Nat.cast_succ]
rw [cast_succ, eval_monomial, eval_monomial, add_comm, add_pow]
-- Porting note: `apply_congr` hadn't been ported yet, so `congr` & `ext` is used.
conv_lhs =>
congr
· congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [one_pow, mul_one, mul_comm]
rw [sum_range_succ, mul_add, Nat.choose_self, Nat.cast_one, one_mul, add_sub_cancel_right,
mul_sum, sum_range_succ', Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, add_zero]
refine sum_congr rfl fun y _hy => ?_
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.succ_mul_choose_eq, Nat.cast_mul,
Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align polynomial.eval_monomial_one_add_sub Polynomial.eval_monomial_one_add_sub
/-- `Polynomial.eval` as linear map -/
@[simps]
def leval {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun f := f.eval r
map_add' _f _g := eval_add
map_smul' c f := eval_smul c f r
#align polynomial.leval Polynomial.leval
#align polynomial.leval_apply Polynomial.leval_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval_natCast_mul {n : ℕ} : ((n : R[X]) * p).eval x = n * p.eval x := by
rw [← C_eq_natCast, eval_C_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_nat_cast_mul Polynomial.eval_natCast_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_nat_cast_mul := eval_natCast_mul
@[simp]
theorem eval_mul_X : (p * X).eval x = p.eval x * x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q ph qh =>
simp only [add_mul, eval_add, ph, qh]
| h_monomial n a =>
simp only [← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, eval_monomial, mul_one, pow_succ,
mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.eval_mul_X Polynomial.eval_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem eval_mul_X_pow {k : ℕ} : (p * X ^ k).eval x = p.eval x * x ^ k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ih]
#align polynomial.eval_mul_X_pow Polynomial.eval_mul_X_pow
theorem eval_sum (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → R[X]) (x : R) :
(p.sum f).eval x = p.sum fun n a => (f n a).eval x :=
eval₂_sum _ _ _ _
#align polynomial.eval_sum Polynomial.eval_sum
theorem eval_finset_sum (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R[X]) (x : R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).eval x = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).eval x :=
eval₂_finset_sum _ _ _ _
#align polynomial.eval_finset_sum Polynomial.eval_finset_sum
/-- `IsRoot p x` implies `x` is a root of `p`. The evaluation of `p` at `x` is zero -/
def IsRoot (p : R[X]) (a : R) : Prop :=
p.eval a = 0
#align polynomial.is_root Polynomial.IsRoot
instance IsRoot.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (IsRoot p a) := by
unfold IsRoot; infer_instance
#align polynomial.is_root.decidable Polynomial.IsRoot.decidable
@[simp]
theorem IsRoot.def : IsRoot p a ↔ p.eval a = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.is_root.def Polynomial.IsRoot.def
theorem IsRoot.eq_zero (h : IsRoot p x) : eval x p = 0 :=
h
#align polynomial.is_root.eq_zero Polynomial.IsRoot.eq_zero
theorem coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff p 0 = p.eval 0 :=
calc
coeff p 0 = coeff p 0 * 0 ^ 0 := by simp
_ = p.eval 0 := by
symm
rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact Finset.sum_eq_single _ (fun b _ hb => by simp [zero_pow hb]) (by simp)
#align polynomial.coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero Polynomial.coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero
theorem zero_isRoot_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero {p : R[X]} (hp : p.coeff 0 = 0) : IsRoot p 0 := by
rwa [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero] at hp
#align polynomial.zero_is_root_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero Polynomial.zero_isRoot_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero
theorem IsRoot.dvd {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p q : R[X]} {x : R} (h : p.IsRoot x)
(hpq : p ∣ q) : q.IsRoot x := by
rwa [IsRoot, eval, eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero _ _ hpq]
#align polynomial.is_root.dvd Polynomial.IsRoot.dvd
theorem not_isRoot_C (r a : R) (hr : r ≠ 0) : ¬IsRoot (C r) a := by simpa using hr
#align polynomial.not_is_root_C Polynomial.not_isRoot_C
theorem eval_surjective (x : R) : Function.Surjective <| eval x := fun y => ⟨C y, eval_C⟩
#align polynomial.eval_surjective Polynomial.eval_surjective
end Eval
section Comp
/-- The composition of polynomials as a polynomial. -/
def comp (p q : R[X]) : R[X] :=
p.eval₂ C q
#align polynomial.comp Polynomial.comp
theorem comp_eq_sum_left : p.comp q = p.sum fun e a => C a * q ^ e := by rw [comp, eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.comp_eq_sum_left Polynomial.comp_eq_sum_left
@[simp]
theorem comp_X : p.comp X = p := by
simp only [comp, eval₂_def, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact sum_monomial_eq _
#align polynomial.comp_X Polynomial.comp_X
@[simp]
theorem X_comp : X.comp p = p :=
eval₂_X _ _
#align polynomial.X_comp Polynomial.X_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_C : p.comp (C a) = C (p.eval a) := by simp [comp, map_sum (C : R →+* _)]
#align polynomial.comp_C Polynomial.comp_C
@[simp]
theorem C_comp : (C a).comp p = C a :=
eval₂_C _ _
#align polynomial.C_comp Polynomial.C_comp
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp {n : ℕ} : (n : R[X]).comp p = n := by rw [← C_eq_natCast, C_comp]
#align polynomial.nat_cast_comp Polynomial.natCast_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_comp := natCast_comp
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_comp (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : R[X]).comp p = n :=
natCast_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero : p.comp (0 : R[X]) = C (p.eval 0) := by rw [← C_0, comp_C]
#align polynomial.comp_zero Polynomial.comp_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp : comp (0 : R[X]) p = 0 := by rw [← C_0, C_comp]
#align polynomial.zero_comp Polynomial.zero_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_one : p.comp 1 = C (p.eval 1) := by rw [← C_1, comp_C]
#align polynomial.comp_one Polynomial.comp_one
@[simp]
theorem one_comp : comp (1 : R[X]) p = 1 := by rw [← C_1, C_comp]
#align polynomial.one_comp Polynomial.one_comp
@[simp]
theorem add_comp : (p + q).comp r = p.comp r + q.comp r :=
eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.add_comp Polynomial.add_comp
@[simp]
theorem monomial_comp (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).comp p = C a * p ^ n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
#align polynomial.monomial_comp Polynomial.monomial_comp
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_comp : (p * X).comp r = p.comp r * r := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, add_mul, add_comp]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp only [pow_succ, mul_assoc, monomial_mul_X, monomial_comp]
#align polynomial.mul_X_comp Polynomial.mul_X_comp
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (X ^ k).comp p = p ^ k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, mul_X_comp, ih]
#align polynomial.X_pow_comp Polynomial.X_pow_comp
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (p * X ^ k).comp r = p.comp r * r ^ k := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_X_comp]
#align polynomial.mul_X_pow_comp Polynomial.mul_X_pow_comp
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_comp : (C a * p).comp r = C a * p.comp r := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp [hp, hq, mul_add]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp [mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.C_mul_comp Polynomial.C_mul_comp
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mul_comp {n : ℕ} : ((n : R[X]) * p).comp r = n * p.comp r := by
rw [← C_eq_natCast, C_mul_comp]
#align polynomial.nat_cast_mul_comp Polynomial.natCast_mul_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_mul_comp := natCast_mul_comp
theorem mul_X_add_natCast_comp {n : ℕ} :
(p * (X + (n : R[X]))).comp q = p.comp q * (q + n) := by
rw [mul_add, add_comp, mul_X_comp, ← Nat.cast_comm, natCast_mul_comp, Nat.cast_comm, mul_add]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mul_X_add_nat_cast_comp Polynomial.mul_X_add_natCast_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias mul_X_add_nat_cast_comp := mul_X_add_natCast_comp
@[simp]
theorem mul_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (p q r : R[X]) :
(p * q).comp r = p.comp r * q.comp r :=
eval₂_mul _ _
#align polynomial.mul_comp Polynomial.mul_comp
@[simp]
theorem pow_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).comp q = p.comp q ^ n :=
(MonoidHom.mk (OneHom.mk (fun r : R[X] => r.comp q) one_comp) fun r s => mul_comp r s q).map_pow
p n
#align polynomial.pow_comp Polynomial.pow_comp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem bit0_comp : comp (bit0 p : R[X]) q = bit0 (p.comp q) := by simp only [bit0, add_comp]
#align polynomial.bit0_comp Polynomial.bit0_comp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem bit1_comp : comp (bit1 p : R[X]) q = bit1 (p.comp q) := by
simp only [bit1, add_comp, bit0_comp, one_comp]
#align polynomial.bit1_comp Polynomial.bit1_comp
@[simp]
theorem smul_comp [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S) (p q : R[X]) :
(s • p).comp q = s • p.comp q := by
rw [← smul_one_smul R s p, comp, comp, eval₂_smul, ← smul_eq_C_mul, smul_assoc, one_smul]
#align polynomial.smul_comp Polynomial.smul_comp
theorem comp_assoc {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (φ ψ χ : R[X]) :
(φ.comp ψ).comp χ = φ.comp (ψ.comp χ) := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on φ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
· intros
simp_all only [add_comp, mul_comp, C_comp, X_comp, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.comp_assoc Polynomial.comp_assoc
theorem coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree (hqd0 : natDegree q ≠ 0) :
coeff (p.comp q) (natDegree p * natDegree q) =
leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ^ natDegree p := by
rw [comp, eval₂_def, coeff_sum]
-- Porting note: `convert` → `refine`
refine Eq.trans (Finset.sum_eq_single p.natDegree ?h₀ ?h₁) ?h₂
case h₂ =>
simp only [coeff_natDegree, coeff_C_mul, coeff_pow_mul_natDegree]
case h₀ =>
intro b hbs hbp
refine coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (natDegree_mul_le.trans_lt ?_)
rw [natDegree_C, zero_add]
refine natDegree_pow_le.trans_lt ((mul_lt_mul_right (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hqd0)).mpr ?_)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hbs) hbp
case h₁ =>
simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align polynomial.coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree Polynomial.coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree
@[simp] lemma sum_comp (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → R[X]) (q : R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, p i).comp q = ∑ i ∈ s, (p i).comp q := Polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum _ _ _ _
end Comp
section Map
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S)
/-- `map f p` maps a polynomial `p` across a ring hom `f` -/
def map : R[X] → S[X] :=
eval₂ (C.comp f) X
#align polynomial.map Polynomial.map
@[simp]
theorem map_C : (C a).map f = C (f a) :=
eval₂_C _ _
#align polynomial.map_C Polynomial.map_C
@[simp]
theorem map_X : X.map f = X :=
eval₂_X _ _
#align polynomial.map_X Polynomial.map_X
@[simp]
theorem map_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).map f = monomial n (f a) := by
dsimp only [map]
rw [eval₂_monomial, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]; rfl
#align polynomial.map_monomial Polynomial.map_monomial
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : (0 : R[X]).map f = 0 :=
eval₂_zero _ _
#align polynomial.map_zero Polynomial.map_zero
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add : (p + q).map f = p.map f + q.map f :=
eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.map_add Polynomial.map_add
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : (1 : R[X]).map f = 1 :=
eval₂_one _ _
#align polynomial.map_one Polynomial.map_one
@[simp]
protected theorem map_mul : (p * q).map f = p.map f * q.map f := by
rw [map, eval₂_mul_noncomm]
exact fun k => (commute_X _).symm
#align polynomial.map_mul Polynomial.map_mul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul (r : R) : (r • p).map f = f r • p.map f := by
rw [map, eval₂_smul, RingHom.comp_apply, C_mul']
#align polynomial.map_smul Polynomial.map_smul
-- `map` is a ring-hom unconditionally, and theoretically the definition could be replaced,
-- but this turns out not to be easy because `p.map f` does not resolve to `Polynomial.map`
-- if `map` is a `RingHom` instead of a plain function; the elaborator does not try to coerce
-- to a function before trying field (dot) notation (this may be technically infeasible);
-- the relevant code is (both lines): https://github.com/leanprover-community/
-- lean/blob/487ac5d7e9b34800502e1ddf3c7c806c01cf9d51/src/frontends/lean/elaborator.cpp#L1876-L1913
/-- `Polynomial.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
def mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) : R[X] →+* S[X] where
toFun := Polynomial.map f
map_add' _ _ := Polynomial.map_add f
map_zero' := Polynomial.map_zero f
map_mul' _ _ := Polynomial.map_mul f
map_one' := Polynomial.map_one f
#align polynomial.map_ring_hom Polynomial.mapRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) : ⇑(mapRingHom f) = map f :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_map_ring_hom Polynomial.coe_mapRingHom
-- This is protected to not clash with the global `map_natCast`.
@[simp]
protected theorem map_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).map f = n :=
map_natCast (mapRingHom f) n
#align polynomial.map_nat_cast Polynomial.map_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias map_nat_cast := map_natCast
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : R[X]).map f = OfNat.ofNat n :=
show (n : R[X]).map f = n by rw [Polynomial.map_natCast]
#noalign polynomial.map_bit0
#noalign polynomial.map_bit1
--TODO rename to `map_dvd_map`
theorem map_dvd (f : R →+* S) {x y : R[X]} : x ∣ y → x.map f ∣ y.map f :=
(mapRingHom f).map_dvd
#align polynomial.map_dvd Polynomial.map_dvd
@[simp]
theorem coeff_map (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.map f) n = f (coeff p n) := by
rw [map, eval₂_def, coeff_sum, sum]
conv_rhs => rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, coeff_sum, sum, map_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _hx => ?_
simp only [RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
split_ifs <;> simp [f.map_zero]
#align polynomial.coeff_map Polynomial.coeff_map
/-- If `R` and `S` are isomorphic, then so are their polynomial rings. -/
@[simps!]
def mapEquiv (e : R ≃+* S) : R[X] ≃+* S[X] :=
RingEquiv.ofHomInv (mapRingHom (e : R →+* S)) (mapRingHom (e.symm : S →+* R)) (by ext <;> simp)
(by ext <;> simp)
#align polynomial.map_equiv Polynomial.mapEquiv
#align polynomial.map_equiv_apply Polynomial.mapEquiv_apply
#align polynomial.map_equiv_symm_apply Polynomial.mapEquiv_symm_apply
theorem map_map [Semiring T] (g : S →+* T) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).map g = p.map (g.comp f) :=
ext (by simp [coeff_map])
#align polynomial.map_map Polynomial.map_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : p.map (RingHom.id _) = p := by simp [Polynomial.ext_iff, coeff_map]
#align polynomial.map_id Polynomial.map_id
/-- The polynomial ring over a finite product of rings is isomorphic to
the product of polynomial rings over individual rings. -/
def piEquiv {ι} [Finite ι] (R : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Semiring (R i)] :
(∀ i, R i)[X] ≃+* ∀ i, (R i)[X] :=
.ofBijective (Pi.ringHom fun i ↦ mapRingHom (Pi.evalRingHom R i))
⟨fun p q h ↦ by ext n i; simpa using congr_arg (fun p ↦ coeff (p i) n) h,
fun p ↦ ⟨.ofFinsupp (.ofSupportFinite (fun n i ↦ coeff (p i) n) <|
(Set.finite_iUnion fun i ↦ (p i).support.finite_toSet).subset fun n hn ↦ by
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Finset.mem_coe, mem_support_iff, Function.mem_support] at hn ⊢
contrapose! hn; exact funext hn), by ext i n; exact coeff_map _ _⟩⟩
theorem eval₂_eq_eval_map {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = (p.map f).eval x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp [hp, hq]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map Polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map
theorem map_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (map f) := fun p q h =>
ext fun m => hf <| by rw [← coeff_map f, ← coeff_map f, h]
#align polynomial.map_injective Polynomial.map_injective
theorem map_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Function.Surjective (map f) := fun p =>
Polynomial.induction_on' p
(fun p q hp hq =>
let ⟨p', hp'⟩ := hp
let ⟨q', hq'⟩ := hq
⟨p' + q', by rw [Polynomial.map_add f, hp', hq']⟩)
fun n s =>
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := hf s
⟨monomial n r, by rw [map_monomial f, hr]⟩
#align polynomial.map_surjective Polynomial.map_surjective
theorem degree_map_le (p : R[X]) : degree (p.map f) ≤ degree p := by
refine (degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun m hm => ?_
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
simp [hm m le_rfl]
#align polynomial.degree_map_le Polynomial.degree_map_le
theorem natDegree_map_le (p : R[X]) : natDegree (p.map f) ≤ natDegree p :=
natDegree_le_natDegree (degree_map_le f p)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_map_le Polynomial.natDegree_map_le
variable {f}
protected theorem map_eq_zero_iff (hf : Function.Injective f) : p.map f = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff (mapRingHom f) (map_injective f hf)
#align polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff
protected theorem map_ne_zero_iff (hf : Function.Injective f) : p.map f ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
(Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff hf).not
#align polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
theorem map_monic_eq_zero_iff (hp : p.Monic) : p.map f = 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
⟨fun hfp x =>
calc
f x = f x * f p.leadingCoeff := by simp only [mul_one, hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
_ = f x * (p.map f).coeff p.natDegree := congr_arg _ (coeff_map _ _).symm
_ = 0 := by simp only [hfp, mul_zero, coeff_zero]
,
fun h => ext fun n => by simp only [h, coeff_map, coeff_zero]⟩
#align polynomial.map_monic_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.map_monic_eq_zero_iff
theorem map_monic_ne_zero (hp : p.Monic) [Nontrivial S] : p.map f ≠ 0 := fun h =>
f.map_one_ne_zero ((map_monic_eq_zero_iff hp).mp h _)
#align polynomial.map_monic_ne_zero Polynomial.map_monic_ne_zero
theorem degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S) (hf : f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0) :
degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
le_antisymm (degree_map_le f _) <| by
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 :=
leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mp fun hp0 => hf (_root_.trans (congr_arg _ hp0) f.map_zero)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp0]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_map]
exact hf
#align polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S) (hf : f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f hf)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_map_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero
theorem leadingCoeff_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S) (hf : f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map, natDegree_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f hf]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_map_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.leadingCoeff_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero
variable (f)
@[simp]
theorem mapRingHom_id : mapRingHom (RingHom.id R) = RingHom.id R[X] :=
RingHom.ext fun _x => map_id
#align polynomial.map_ring_hom_id Polynomial.mapRingHom_id
@[simp]
theorem mapRingHom_comp [Semiring T] (f : S →+* T) (g : R →+* S) :
(mapRingHom f).comp (mapRingHom g) = mapRingHom (f.comp g) :=
RingHom.ext <| Polynomial.map_map g f
#align polynomial.map_ring_hom_comp Polynomial.mapRingHom_comp
protected theorem map_list_prod (L : List R[X]) : L.prod.map f = (L.map <| map f).prod :=
Eq.symm <| List.prod_hom _ (mapRingHom f).toMonoidHom
#align polynomial.map_list_prod Polynomial.map_list_prod
@[simp]
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).map f = p.map f ^ n :=
(mapRingHom f).map_pow _ _
#align polynomial.map_pow Polynomial.map_pow
theorem mem_map_rangeS {p : S[X]} : p ∈ (mapRingHom f).rangeS ↔ ∀ n, p.coeff n ∈ f.rangeS := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩ n
rw [coe_mapRingHom, coeff_map]
exact Set.mem_range_self _
· intro h
rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow]
refine (mapRingHom f).rangeS.sum_mem ?_
intro i _hi
rcases h i with ⟨c, hc⟩
use C c * X ^ i
rw [coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, hc, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X]
#align polynomial.mem_map_srange Polynomial.mem_map_rangeS
theorem mem_map_range {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) {p : S[X]} :
p ∈ (mapRingHom f).range ↔ ∀ n, p.coeff n ∈ f.range :=
mem_map_rangeS f
#align polynomial.mem_map_range Polynomial.mem_map_range
theorem eval₂_map [Semiring T] (g : S →+* T) (x : T) :
(p.map f).eval₂ g x = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) x := by
rw [eval₂_eq_eval_map, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_map]
#align polynomial.eval₂_map Polynomial.eval₂_map
theorem eval_map (x : S) : (p.map f).eval x = p.eval₂ f x :=
(eval₂_eq_eval_map f).symm
#align polynomial.eval_map Polynomial.eval_map
protected theorem map_sum {ι : Type*} (g : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).map f = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).map f :=
map_sum (mapRingHom f) _ _
#align polynomial.map_sum Polynomial.map_sum
theorem map_comp (p q : R[X]) : map f (p.comp q) = (map f p).comp (map f q) :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (by simp only [map_C, forall_const, C_comp, eq_self_iff_true])
(by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [Polynomial.map_add, add_comp, forall_const,
imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true])
(by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, comp, forall_const,
eval₂_mul_X, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, map_X, Polynomial.map_mul])
#align polynomial.map_comp Polynomial.map_comp
@[simp]
theorem eval_zero_map (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).eval 0 = f (p.eval 0) := by
simp [← coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero]
#align polynomial.eval_zero_map Polynomial.eval_zero_map
@[simp]
theorem eval_one_map (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).eval 1 = f (p.eval 1) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, Polynomial.map_add, RingHom.map_add, eval_add]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp only [one_pow, mul_one, eval_monomial, map_monomial]
#align polynomial.eval_one_map Polynomial.eval_one_map
@[simp]
theorem eval_natCast_map (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p.map f).eval (n : S) = f (p.eval n) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, Polynomial.map_add, RingHom.map_add, eval_add]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp only [map_natCast f, eval_monomial, map_monomial, f.map_pow, f.map_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_nat_cast_map Polynomial.eval_natCast_map
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_nat_cast_map := eval_natCast_map
@[simp]
theorem eval_intCast_map {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (i : ℤ) :
(p.map f).eval (i : S) = f (p.eval i) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add p q hp hq =>
simp only [hp, hq, Polynomial.map_add, RingHom.map_add, eval_add]
| h_monomial n r =>
simp only [map_intCast, eval_monomial, map_monomial, map_pow, map_mul]
#align polynomial.eval_int_cast_map Polynomial.eval_intCast_map
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_int_cast_map := eval_intCast_map
end Map
/-!
we have made `eval₂` irreducible from the start.
Perhaps we can make also `eval`, `comp`, and `map` irreducible too?
-/
section HomEval₂
variable [Semiring S] [Semiring T] (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) (p)
theorem hom_eval₂ (x : S) : g (p.eval₂ f x) = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) (g x) := by
rw [← eval₂_map, eval₂_at_apply, eval_map]
#align polynomial.hom_eval₂ Polynomial.hom_eval₂
end HomEval₂
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
section Eval
section
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]} {x : R} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
theorem eval₂_hom (x : R) : p.eval₂ f (f x) = f (p.eval x) :=
RingHom.comp_id f ▸ (hom_eval₂ p (RingHom.id R) f x).symm
#align polynomial.eval₂_hom Polynomial.eval₂_hom
end
section
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]} {x : R} [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S)
theorem eval₂_comp {x : S} : eval₂ f x (p.comp q) = eval₂ f (eval₂ f x q) p := by
rw [comp, p.as_sum_range]; simp [eval₂_finset_sum, eval₂_pow]
#align polynomial.eval₂_comp Polynomial.eval₂_comp
@[simp]
theorem iterate_comp_eval₂ (k : ℕ) (t : S) :
eval₂ f t (p.comp^[k] q) = (fun x => eval₂ f x p)^[k] (eval₂ f t q) := by
induction' k with k IH
· simp
· rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', Function.iterate_succ_apply', eval₂_comp, IH]
#align polynomial.iterate_comp_eval₂ Polynomial.iterate_comp_eval₂
end
section Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (x : S) (p q : R[X])
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul' :
(p * q).eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x = p.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x * q.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x := by
exact eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun k => Algebra.commute_algebraMap_left (coeff q k) x
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_pow' (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x = (p.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x) ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.zero_eq, pow_zero, eval₂_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, eval₂_mul', ih]
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_comp' : eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x (p.comp q) =
eval₂ (algebraMap R S) (eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x q) p := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add r s hr hs => simp only [add_comp, eval₂_add, hr, hs]
| h_monomial n a => simp only [monomial_comp, eval₂_mul', eval₂_C, eval₂_monomial, eval₂_pow']
end Algebra
section
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : R[X]} {x : R} [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S)
@[simp]
theorem eval_mul : (p * q).eval x = p.eval x * q.eval x :=
eval₂_mul _ _
#align polynomial.eval_mul Polynomial.eval_mul
/-- `eval r`, regarded as a ring homomorphism from `R[X]` to `R`. -/
def evalRingHom : R → R[X] →+* R :=
eval₂RingHom (RingHom.id _)
#align polynomial.eval_ring_hom Polynomial.evalRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_evalRingHom (r : R) : (evalRingHom r : R[X] → R) = eval r :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_eval_ring_hom Polynomial.coe_evalRingHom
theorem evalRingHom_zero : evalRingHom 0 = constantCoeff :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun p => p.coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero.symm
#align polynomial.eval_ring_hom_zero Polynomial.evalRingHom_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).eval x = p.eval x ^ n :=
eval₂_pow _ _ _
#align polynomial.eval_pow Polynomial.eval_pow
@[simp]
theorem eval_comp : (p.comp q).eval x = p.eval (q.eval x) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add r s hr hs =>
simp [add_comp, hr, hs]
| h_monomial n a =>
simp
#align polynomial.eval_comp Polynomial.eval_comp
@[simp]
theorem iterate_comp_eval :
∀ (k : ℕ) (t : R), (p.comp^[k] q).eval t = (fun x => p.eval x)^[k] (q.eval t) :=
iterate_comp_eval₂ _
#align polynomial.iterate_comp_eval Polynomial.iterate_comp_eval
lemma isRoot_comp {R} [CommSemiring R] {p q : R[X]} {r : R} :
(p.comp q).IsRoot r ↔ p.IsRoot (q.eval r) := by simp_rw [IsRoot, eval_comp]
/-- `comp p`, regarded as a ring homomorphism from `R[X]` to itself. -/
def compRingHom : R[X] → R[X] →+* R[X] :=
eval₂RingHom C
#align polynomial.comp_ring_hom Polynomial.compRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_compRingHom (q : R[X]) : (compRingHom q : R[X] → R[X]) = fun p => comp p q :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_comp_ring_hom Polynomial.coe_compRingHom
theorem coe_compRingHom_apply (p q : R[X]) : (compRingHom q : R[X] → R[X]) p = comp p q :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_comp_ring_hom_apply Polynomial.coe_compRingHom_apply
theorem root_mul_left_of_isRoot (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} : IsRoot q a → IsRoot (p * q) a := fun H => by
rw [IsRoot, eval_mul, IsRoot.def.1 H, mul_zero]
#align polynomial.root_mul_left_of_is_root Polynomial.root_mul_left_of_isRoot
theorem root_mul_right_of_isRoot {p : R[X]} (q : R[X]) : IsRoot p a → IsRoot (p * q) a := fun H =>
by rw [IsRoot, eval_mul, IsRoot.def.1 H, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.root_mul_right_of_is_root Polynomial.root_mul_right_of_isRoot
theorem eval₂_multiset_prod (s : Multiset R[X]) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x s.prod = (s.map (eval₂ f x)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod (eval₂RingHom f x) s
#align polynomial.eval₂_multiset_prod Polynomial.eval₂_multiset_prod
theorem eval₂_finset_prod (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R[X]) (x : S) :
(∏ i ∈ s, g i).eval₂ f x = ∏ i ∈ s, (g i).eval₂ f x :=
map_prod (eval₂RingHom f x) _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_finset_prod Polynomial.eval₂_finset_prod
/-- Polynomial evaluation commutes with `List.prod`
-/
theorem eval_list_prod (l : List R[X]) (x : R) : eval x l.prod = (l.map (eval x)).prod :=
map_list_prod (evalRingHom x) l
#align polynomial.eval_list_prod Polynomial.eval_list_prod
/-- Polynomial evaluation commutes with `Multiset.prod`
-/
theorem eval_multiset_prod (s : Multiset R[X]) (x : R) : eval x s.prod = (s.map (eval x)).prod :=
(evalRingHom x).map_multiset_prod s
#align polynomial.eval_multiset_prod Polynomial.eval_multiset_prod
/-- Polynomial evaluation commutes with `Finset.prod`
-/
theorem eval_prod {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → R[X]) (x : R) :
eval x (∏ j ∈ s, p j) = ∏ j ∈ s, eval x (p j) :=
map_prod (evalRingHom x) _ _
#align polynomial.eval_prod Polynomial.eval_prod
theorem list_prod_comp (l : List R[X]) (q : R[X]) :
l.prod.comp q = (l.map fun p : R[X] => p.comp q).prod :=
map_list_prod (compRingHom q) _
#align polynomial.list_prod_comp Polynomial.list_prod_comp
theorem multiset_prod_comp (s : Multiset R[X]) (q : R[X]) :
s.prod.comp q = (s.map fun p : R[X] => p.comp q).prod :=
map_multiset_prod (compRingHom q) _
#align polynomial.multiset_prod_comp Polynomial.multiset_prod_comp
theorem prod_comp {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → R[X]) (q : R[X]) :
(∏ j ∈ s, p j).comp q = ∏ j ∈ s, (p j).comp q :=
map_prod (compRingHom q) _ _
#align polynomial.prod_comp Polynomial.prod_comp
theorem isRoot_prod {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → R[X])
(x : R) : IsRoot (∏ j ∈ s, p j) x ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, IsRoot (p i) x := by
simp only [IsRoot, eval_prod, Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff]
#align polynomial.is_root_prod Polynomial.isRoot_prod
theorem eval_dvd : p ∣ q → eval x p ∣ eval x q :=
eval₂_dvd _ _
#align polynomial.eval_dvd Polynomial.eval_dvd
theorem eval_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval_eq_zero : p ∣ q → eval x p = 0 → eval x q = 0 :=
eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero _ _
#align polynomial.eval_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval_eq_zero Polynomial.eval_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval_geom_sum {R} [CommSemiring R] {n : ℕ} {x : R} :
eval x (∑ i ∈ range n, X ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by simp [eval_finset_sum]
#align polynomial.eval_geom_sum Polynomial.eval_geom_sum
end
end Eval
section Map
theorem support_map_subset [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) :
(map f p).support ⊆ p.support := by
intro x
contrapose!
simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align polynomial.support_map_subset Polynomial.support_map_subset
theorem support_map_of_injective [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (map f p).support = p.support := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support_iff, coeff_map, ← map_zero f, hf.ne_iff,
forall_const]
#align polynomial.support_map_of_injective Polynomial.support_map_of_injective
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S)
protected theorem map_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : m.prod.map f = (m.map <| map f).prod :=
Eq.symm <| Multiset.prod_hom _ (mapRingHom f).toMonoidHom
#align polynomial.map_multiset_prod Polynomial.map_multiset_prod
protected theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} (g : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
(∏ i ∈ s, g i).map f = ∏ i ∈ s, (g i).map f :=
map_prod (mapRingHom f) _ _
#align polynomial.map_prod Polynomial.map_prod
theorem IsRoot.map {f : R →+* S} {x : R} {p : R[X]} (h : IsRoot p x) : IsRoot (p.map f) (f x) := by
rw [IsRoot, eval_map, eval₂_hom, h.eq_zero, f.map_zero]
#align polynomial.is_root.map Polynomial.IsRoot.map
theorem IsRoot.of_map {R} [CommRing R] {f : R →+* S} {x : R} {p : R[X]} (h : IsRoot (p.map f) (f x))
(hf : Function.Injective f) : IsRoot p x := by
rwa [IsRoot, ← (injective_iff_map_eq_zero' f).mp hf, ← eval₂_hom, ← eval_map]
#align polynomial.is_root.of_map Polynomial.IsRoot.of_map
theorem isRoot_map_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {f : R →+* S} {x : R} {p : R[X]}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : IsRoot (p.map f) (f x) ↔ IsRoot p x :=
⟨fun h => h.of_map hf, fun h => h.map⟩
#align polynomial.is_root_map_iff Polynomial.isRoot_map_iff
end Map
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q r : R[X]}
@[simp]
protected theorem map_sub {S} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) : (p - q).map f = p.map f - q.map f :=
(mapRingHom f).map_sub p q
#align polynomial.map_sub Polynomial.map_sub
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg {S} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) : (-p).map f = -p.map f :=
(mapRingHom f).map_neg p
#align polynomial.map_neg Polynomial.map_neg
@[simp] protected lemma map_intCast {S} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℤ) : map f ↑n = ↑n :=
map_intCast (mapRingHom f) n
#align polynomial.map_int_cast Polynomial.map_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias map_int_cast := map_intCast
@[simp]
theorem eval_intCast {n : ℤ} {x : R} : (n : R[X]).eval x = n := by
simp only [← C_eq_intCast, eval_C]
#align polynomial.eval_int_cast Polynomial.eval_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval_int_cast := eval_intCast
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_neg {S} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} : (-p).eval₂ f x = -p.eval₂ f x := by
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← eval₂_add, add_left_neg, eval₂_zero]
#align polynomial.eval₂_neg Polynomial.eval₂_neg
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_sub {S} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} :
(p - q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x - q.eval₂ f x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, eval₂_add, eval₂_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align polynomial.eval₂_sub Polynomial.eval₂_sub
@[simp]
theorem eval_neg (p : R[X]) (x : R) : (-p).eval x = -p.eval x :=
eval₂_neg _
#align polynomial.eval_neg Polynomial.eval_neg
@[simp]
theorem eval_sub (p q : R[X]) (x : R) : (p - q).eval x = p.eval x - q.eval x :=
eval₂_sub _
#align polynomial.eval_sub Polynomial.eval_sub
theorem root_X_sub_C : IsRoot (X - C a) b ↔ a = b := by
rw [IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
#align polynomial.root_X_sub_C Polynomial.root_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem neg_comp : (-p).comp q = -p.comp q :=
eval₂_neg _
#align polynomial.neg_comp Polynomial.neg_comp
@[simp]
theorem sub_comp : (p - q).comp r = p.comp r - q.comp r :=
eval₂_sub _
#align polynomial.sub_comp Polynomial.sub_comp
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp (i : ℤ) : comp (i : R[X]) p = i := by cases i <;> simp
#align polynomial.cast_int_comp Polynomial.intCast_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-27")] alias cast_int_comp := intCast_comp
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_intCast {S : Type*} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℤ) :
p.eval₂ f n = f (p.eval n) := by
convert eval₂_at_apply (p := p) f n
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval₂_at_int_cast := eval₂_at_intCast
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Eval.lean | 1,377 | 1,379 | theorem mul_X_sub_intCast_comp {n : ℕ} :
(p * (X - (n : R[X]))).comp q = p.comp q * (q - n) := by |
rw [mul_sub, sub_comp, mul_X_comp, ← Nat.cast_comm, natCast_mul_comp, Nat.cast_comm, mul_sub]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
/-!
# Topology on extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
/-- Topology on `ℝ≥0∞`.
Note: this is different from the `EMetricSpace` topology. The `EMetricSpace` topology has
`IsOpen {∞}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
/-- Closed intervals `Set.Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)`, `ε ≠ 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of an
extended nonnegative real number `x ≠ ∞`. We use `Set.Icc` instead of `Set.Ioo` because this way the
statement works for `x = 0`.
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ℝ≥0∞` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_right ENNReal.continuous_sub_right
protected theorem Tendsto.pow {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => m x ^ n) f (𝓝 (a ^ n)) :=
((continuous_pow n).tendsto a).comp hm
#align ennreal.tendsto.pow ENNReal.Tendsto.pow
theorem le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a < 1, a * x ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
have : Tendsto (· * x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 (1 * x)) :=
(ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inr one_ne_zero)).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [one_mul] at this
exact le_of_tendsto this (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall h)
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le
theorem iInf_mul_left' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i := by
by_cases H : a = ∞ ∧ ⨅ i, f i = 0
· rcases h H.1 H.2 with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [H.2, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
exact fun b hb => ⟨i, by rwa [hi, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero]⟩
· rw [not_and_or] at H
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, iInf_of_empty, mul_top]
exact mt h0 (not_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›)
· exact (ENNReal.mul_left_mono.map_iInf_of_continuousAt'
(ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul H)).symm
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left' ENNReal.iInf_mul_left'
theorem iInf_mul_left {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_mul_left' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left ENNReal.iInf_mul_left
theorem iInf_mul_right' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a := by
simpa only [mul_comm a] using iInf_mul_left' h h0
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right' ENNReal.iInf_mul_right'
theorem iInf_mul_right {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a :=
iInf_mul_right' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right ENNReal.iInf_mul_right
theorem inv_map_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iInf x)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iInf x
#align ennreal.inv_map_infi ENNReal.inv_map_iInf
theorem inv_map_iSup {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iSup x)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iSup x
#align ennreal.inv_map_supr ENNReal.inv_map_iSup
theorem inv_limsup {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(limsup x l)⁻¹ = liminf (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.limsup_apply
#align ennreal.inv_limsup ENNReal.inv_limsup
theorem inv_liminf {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(liminf x l)⁻¹ = limsup (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.liminf_apply
#align ennreal.inv_liminf ENNReal.inv_liminf
instance : ContinuousInv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨OrderIso.invENNReal.continuous⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `[InvolutiveInv _] [ContinuousInv _]`
protected theorem tendsto_inv_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun x => (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using Tendsto.inv h, Tendsto.inv⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff
protected theorem Tendsto.div {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul hma _ (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _ <;> simp [ha, hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div ENNReal.Tendsto.div
protected theorem Tendsto.const_div {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.const_mul (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm)
simp [hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_div ENNReal.Tendsto.const_div
protected theorem Tendsto.div_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul_const hm
simp [ha]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div_const ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const
protected theorem tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.inv_top ▸ ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : iSup s + a = ⨆ b, s b + a :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) <|
monotone_id.add monotone_const
#align ennreal.supr_add ENNReal.iSup_add
theorem biSup_add' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + a = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i + a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 h
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_add]
#align ennreal.bsupr_add' ENNReal.biSup_add'
theorem add_biSup' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), a + f i := by
simp only [add_comm a, biSup_add' h]
#align ennreal.add_bsupr' ENNReal.add_biSup'
theorem biSup_add {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + a = ⨆ i ∈ s, f i + a :=
biSup_add' hs
#align ennreal.bsupr_add ENNReal.biSup_add
theorem add_biSup {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, a + f i :=
add_biSup' hs
#align ennreal.add_bsupr ENNReal.add_biSup
theorem sSup_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s + a = ⨆ b ∈ s, b + a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_add hs]
#align ennreal.Sup_add ENNReal.sSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : a + iSup s = ⨆ b, a + s b := by
rw [add_comm, iSup_add]; simp [add_comm]
#align ennreal.add_supr ENNReal.add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_le {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞}
{a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, f i + g j ≤ a) : iSup f + iSup g ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_add, add_iSup]; exact iSup₂_le h
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_le ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_le
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {q : ι' → Prop} (hp : ∃ i, p i) (hq : ∃ j, q j)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, q j → f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + ⨆ (j) (_ : q j), g j) ≤ a := by
simp_rw [biSup_add' hp, add_biSup' hq]
exact iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup₂_le (h i hi)
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le' ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le'
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le {ι ι'} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ t, f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) ≤ a :=
biSup_add_biSup_le' hs ht h
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le
theorem iSup_add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iSup_of_empty, bot_eq_zero, zero_add]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun a => add_le_add (le_iSup _ _) (le_iSup _ _))
refine iSup_add_iSup_le fun i j => ?_
rcases h i j with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact le_iSup_of_le k hk
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : Monotone g) : iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a :=
iSup_add_iSup fun i j => ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add (hf <| le_sup_left) (hg <| le_sup_right)⟩
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_of_monotone ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone
theorem finset_sum_iSup_nat {α} {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] {s : Finset α} {f : α → ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) : (∑ a ∈ s, iSup (f a)) = ⨆ n, ∑ a ∈ s, f a n := by
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a s has ih
simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [ih, iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone (hf a)]
intro i j h
exact Finset.sum_le_sum fun a _ => hf a h
#align ennreal.finset_sum_supr_nat ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * iSup f = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· obtain rfl : f = fun _ => 0 := funext hf
simp only [iSup_zero_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· refine (monotone_id.const_mul' _).map_iSup_of_continuousAt ?_ (mul_zero a)
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id (Or.inl ?_)
exact mt iSup_eq_zero.1 hf
#align ennreal.mul_supr ENNReal.mul_iSup
theorem mul_sSup {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, a * i := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.mul_Sup ENNReal.mul_sSup
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
#align ennreal.supr_mul ENNReal.iSup_mul
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (f : ι → ℝ≥0∞)
(c : R) : (c • ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, c • f i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `iSup _` with `iSup f`
simp only [← smul_one_mul c (f _), ← smul_one_mul c (iSup f), ENNReal.mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.smul_supr ENNReal.smul_iSup
theorem smul_sSup {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (c : R) :
c • sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, c • i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `_` with `s`
simp_rw [← smul_one_mul c (sSup s), ENNReal.mul_sSup, smul_one_mul]
#align ennreal.smul_Sup ENNReal.smul_sSup
theorem iSup_div {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f / a = ⨆ i, f i / a :=
iSup_mul
#align ennreal.supr_div ENNReal.iSup_div
protected theorem tendsto_coe_sub {b : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun b : ℝ≥0∞ => ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
continuous_nnreal_sub.tendsto _
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub ENNReal.tendsto_coe_sub
theorem sub_iSup {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {b : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a < ∞) :
(a - ⨆ i, b i) = ⨅ i, a - b i :=
antitone_const_tsub.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuous_sub_left hr.ne).continuousAt
#align ennreal.sub_supr ENNReal.sub_iSup
theorem exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ 0 ∉ s ∧ ∞ ∉ s := by
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, hs⟩ :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∉ s) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∉ s :=
exists_countable_dense_no_bot_top ℝ≥0∞
exact ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, fun h => hs.1 0 (by simp) h, fun h => hs.2 ∞ (by simp) h⟩
#align ennreal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
theorem exists_lt_add_of_lt_add {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x < y + z) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
∃ y' z', y' < y ∧ z' < z ∧ x < y' + z' := by
have : NeZero y := ⟨hy⟩
have : NeZero z := ⟨hz⟩
have A : Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 + p.2) (𝓝[<] y ×ˢ 𝓝[<] z) (𝓝 (y + z)) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ (Filter.prod_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
rw [← nhds_prod_eq]
exact tendsto_add
rcases ((A.eventually (lt_mem_nhds h)).and
(Filter.prod_mem_prod self_mem_nhdsWithin self_mem_nhdsWithin)).exists with
⟨⟨y', z'⟩, hx, hy', hz'⟩
exact ⟨y', z', hy', hz', hx⟩
#align ennreal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add ENNReal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add
theorem ofReal_cinfi (f : α → ℝ) [Nonempty α] :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
by_cases hf : BddBelow (range f)
· exact
Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
(fun i j hij => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hij) hf
· symm
rw [Real.iInf_of_not_bddBelow hf, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
obtain ⟨y, hy_mem, hy_neg⟩ := not_bddBelow_iff.mp hf 0
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hy_mem
refine fun x hx => ⟨i, ?_⟩
rwa [ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hy_neg.le]
#align ennreal.of_real_cinfi ENNReal.ofReal_cinfi
end TopologicalSpace
section Liminf
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, x n < R := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h r] with i hi using hi.trans (le_abs_self (x i))
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, R < x n := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h (-r)] with i hi using(le_neg.1 hi).trans (neg_le_abs _)
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top'
theorem exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hf : liminf (fun i => (Real.nnabs (x i) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞)
(hbdd : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun i => |x i|) :
∃ a b : ℚ, a < b ∧ (∃ᶠ i in l, x i < a) ∧ ∃ᶠ i in l, ↑b < x i := by
rw [isBoundedUnder_le_abs, not_and_or] at hbdd
obtain hbdd | hbdd := hbdd
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_gt R
refine ⟨q, q + 1, (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le hq (not_lt.1 hx)).le
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q + 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_lt R
refine ⟨q - 1, q, (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q - 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 ((not_lt.1 hx).trans hq.le)
#align ennreal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under ENNReal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under
end Liminf
section tsum
variable {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
@[norm_cast]
protected theorem hasSum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum (fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↑r ↔ HasSum f r := by
simp only [HasSum, ← coe_finset_sum, tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.has_sum_coe ENNReal.hasSum_coe
protected theorem tsum_coe_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0} (h : HasSum f r) : (∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = r :=
(ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 h).tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq
protected theorem coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : Summable f → ↑(tsum f) = ∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)
| ⟨r, hr⟩ => by rw [hr.tsum_eq, ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
#align ennreal.coe_tsum ENNReal.coe_tsum
protected theorem hasSum : HasSum f (⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a) :=
tendsto_atTop_iSup fun _ _ => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset
#align ennreal.has_sum ENNReal.hasSum
@[simp]
protected theorem summable : Summable f :=
⟨_, ENNReal.hasSum⟩
#align ennreal.summable ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → ℝ≥0} : (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ENNReal.coe_tsum h ▸ ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
lift ∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞) to ℝ≥0 using h with a ha
refine ⟨a, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 ?_⟩
rw [ha]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum : ∑' a, f a = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a :=
ENNReal.hasSum.tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Finset α) (hs : ∀ t, ∃ i, t ⊆ s i) :
∑' a, f a = ⨆ i, ∑ a ∈ s i, f a := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
symm
change ⨆ i : ι, (fun t : Finset α => ∑ a ∈ t, f a) (s i) = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a
exact (Finset.sum_mono_set f).iSup_comp_eq hs
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum'
protected theorem tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : ∀ a, β a → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma ENNReal.tsum_sigma
protected theorem tsum_sigma' {β : α → Type*} (f : (Σa, β a) → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma' ENNReal.tsum_sigma'
protected theorem tsum_prod {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod ENNReal.tsum_prod
protected theorem tsum_prod' {f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f (a, b) :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod' ENNReal.tsum_prod'
protected theorem tsum_comm {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' a, ∑' b, f a b = ∑' b, ∑' a, f a b :=
tsum_comm' ENNReal.summable (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_comm ENNReal.tsum_comm
protected theorem tsum_add : ∑' a, (f a + g a) = ∑' a, f a + ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_add ENNReal.tsum_add
protected theorem tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : ∑' a, f a ≤ ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_le_tsum h ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_le_tsum ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum
@[gcongr]
protected theorem _root_.GCongr.ennreal_tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : tsum f ≤ tsum g :=
ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum h
protected theorem sum_le_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (s : Finset α) : ∑ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
sum_le_tsum s (fun _ _ => zero_le _) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.sum_le_tsum ENNReal.sum_le_tsum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat' {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {N : ℕ → ℕ} (hN : Tendsto N atTop atTop) :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range (N i), f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ fun t =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := t.exists_nat_subset_range
let ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop hN 0 n
⟨k, Finset.Subset.trans hn (Finset.range_mono hk)⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat'
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range i, f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = liminf (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.liminf_eq.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_limsup_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = limsup (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.limsup_eq.symm
protected theorem le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ ∑' a, f a :=
le_tsum' ENNReal.summable a
#align ennreal.le_tsum ENNReal.le_tsum
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_eq_zero : ∑' i, f i = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 :=
tsum_eq_zero_iff ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_zero ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero
protected theorem tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → ∑' a, f a = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => top_unique <| ha ▸ ENNReal.le_tsum a
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top
protected theorem lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top {a : α → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞) (j : α) :
a j < ∞ := by
contrapose! tsum_ne_top with h
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨j, top_unique h⟩
#align ennreal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_top [Nonempty α] : ∑' _ : α, ∞ = ∞ :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_top ENNReal.tsum_top
theorem tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero {α : Type*} [Infinite α] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
∑' _ : α, c = ∞ := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c) atTop (𝓝 (∞ * c)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_nat_nhds_top
simp only [true_or_iff, top_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff]
have B : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c ≤ ∑' _ : α, c := fun n => by
rcases Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n with ⟨s, hs⟩
simpa [hs] using @ENNReal.sum_le_tsum α (fun _ => c) s
simpa [hc] using le_of_tendsto' A B
#align ennreal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero
protected theorem ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : ∑' a, f a ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ := fun ha =>
h <| ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
#align ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top
protected theorem tsum_mul_left : ∑' i, a * f i = a * ∑' i, f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· simp [hf]
· rw [← ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at hf
have : Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑ j ∈ s, a * f j) atTop (𝓝 (a * ∑' i, f i)) := by
simp only [← Finset.mul_sum]
exact ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.summable.hasSum (Or.inl hf)
exact HasSum.tsum_eq this
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_left ENNReal.tsum_mul_left
protected theorem tsum_mul_right : ∑' i, f i * a = (∑' i, f i) * a := by
simp [mul_comm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_right ENNReal.tsum_mul_right
protected theorem tsum_const_smul {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (a : R) :
∑' i, a • f i = a • ∑' i, f i := by
simpa only [smul_one_mul] using @ENNReal.tsum_mul_left _ (a • (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) _
#align ennreal.tsum_const_smul ENNReal.tsum_const_smul
@[simp]
theorem tsum_iSup_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} : (∑' b : α, ⨆ _ : a = b, f b) = f a :=
(tsum_eq_single a fun _ h => by simp [h.symm]).trans <| by simp
#align ennreal.tsum_supr_eq ENNReal.tsum_iSup_eq
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
refine ⟨HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← iSup_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat]
· exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
· exact fun s t hst => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (Finset.range_subset.2 hst)
#align ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem tendsto_nat_tsum (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) := by
rw [← hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_tsum ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum
theorem toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) (x : α) :
(((ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = f x :=
coe_toNNReal <| ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf _
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Summable (ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) := by
simpa only [← tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top hf] using hf
#align ennreal.summable_to_nnreal_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) := by
have f_ne_top : ∀ n, f n ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
have h_f_coe : f = fun n => ((f n).toNNReal : ENNReal) :=
funext fun n => (coe_toNNReal (f_ne_top n)).symm
rw [h_f_coe, ← @coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact NNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_summable (summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top hf)
#align ennreal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
exact tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top hf
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- The sum over the complement of a finset tends to `0` when the finset grows to cover the whole
space. This does not need a summability assumption, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑' b : { x // x ∉ s }, f b) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
convert ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 (NNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero f)
rw [ENNReal.coe_tsum]
exact NNReal.summable_comp_injective (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf) Subtype.coe_injective
#align ennreal.tendsto_tsum_compl_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero
protected theorem tsum_apply {ι α : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : α} :
(∑' i, f i) x = ∑' i, f i x :=
tsum_apply <| Pi.summable.mpr fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_apply ENNReal.tsum_apply
theorem tsum_sub {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : ∑' i, g i ≠ ∞) (h₂ : g ≤ f) :
∑' i, (f i - g i) = ∑' i, f i - ∑' i, g i :=
have : ∀ i, f i - g i + g i = f i := fun i => tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h₂ i)
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h₁ <| by simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_add, this]
#align ennreal.tsum_sub ENNReal.tsum_sub
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' x, g (f x) ≤ ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj f hf (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable
ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' y, g y ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) :=
calc ∑' y, g y = ∑' y, g (f (surjInv hf y)) := by simp only [surjInv_eq hf]
_ ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) := tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf) _
theorem tsum_mono_subtype (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∑' x : s, f x ≤ ∑' x : t, f x :=
tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (inclusion_injective h) _
#align ennreal.tsum_mono_subtype ENNReal.tsum_mono_subtype
theorem tsum_iUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' x : Σ i, t i, f x.2 :=
tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective (sigmaToiUnion_surjective t) _
_ = ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x := ENNReal.tsum_sigma' _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s , t i, f x ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x = ∑' x : ⋃ i : s, t i, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ <| by simp
_ ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x := tsum_iUnion_le_tsum _ _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
(tsum_biUnion_le_tsum f s.toSet t).trans_eq (Finset.tsum_subtype s fun i => ∑' x : t i, f x)
#align ennreal.tsum_bUnion_le ENNReal.tsum_biUnion_le
theorem tsum_iUnion_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i, ∑' x : t i, f x := by
rw [← tsum_fintype]
exact tsum_iUnion_le_tsum f t
#align ennreal.tsum_Union_le ENNReal.tsum_iUnion_le
theorem tsum_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x ≤ ∑' x : s, f x + ∑' x : t, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x = ∑' x : ⋃ b, cond b s t, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ union_eq_iUnion
_ ≤ _ := by simpa using tsum_iUnion_le f (cond · s t)
#align ennreal.tsum_union_le ENNReal.tsum_union_le
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (b : β) :
∑' x, f x = f b + ∑' x, ite (x = b) 0 (f x) :=
tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' b ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite ENNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
theorem tsum_add_one_eq_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' n, f n = ∞) (hf0 : f 0 ≠ ∞) :
∑' n, f (n + 1) = ∞ := by
rw [tsum_eq_zero_add' ENNReal.summable, add_eq_top] at hf
exact hf.resolve_left hf0
#align ennreal.tsum_add_one_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_add_one_eq_top
/-- A sum of extended nonnegative reals which is finite can have only finitely many terms
above any positive threshold. -/
theorem finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite := by
by_contra h
have := Infinite.to_subtype h
refine tsum_ne_top (top_unique ?_)
calc ∞ = ∑' _ : { i | ε ≤ a i }, ε := (tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ε_ne_zero).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.val_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun i => i.2) ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- Markov's inequality for `Finset.card` and `tsum` in `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
theorem finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (c_ne_top : c ≠ ∞)
(tsum_le_c : ∑' i, a i ≤ c) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite, ↑hf.toFinset.card ≤ c / ε := by
have hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite :=
finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top (ne_top_of_le_ne_top c_ne_top tsum_le_c) ε_ne_zero
refine ⟨hf, (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (.inl ε_ne_zero) (.inr c_ne_top)).2 ?_⟩
calc ↑hf.toFinset.card * ε = ∑ _i ∈ hf.toFinset, ε := by rw [Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ hf.toFinset, a i := Finset.sum_le_sum fun i => hf.mem_toFinset.1
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := ENNReal.sum_le_tsum _
_ ≤ c := tsum_le_c
#align ennreal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le ENNReal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le
theorem tsum_fiberwise (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) (g : β → γ) :
∑' x, ∑' b : g ⁻¹' {x}, f b = ∑' i, f i := by
apply HasSum.tsum_eq
let equiv := Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv g
apply (equiv.hasSum_iff.mpr ENNReal.summable.hasSum).sigma
exact fun _ ↦ ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.mpr rfl
end tsum
theorem tendsto_toReal_iff {ι} {fi : Filter ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) {x : ℝ≥0∞}
(hx : x ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun n => (f n).toReal) fi (𝓝 x.toReal) ↔ Tendsto f fi (𝓝 x) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx
simp [tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) := by
rw [NNReal.summable_coe]
exact tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe
theorem tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = ∞ ↔ ¬Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) :=
tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe.not_right
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe
theorem hasSum_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
HasSum (fun x => (f x).toReal) (∑' x, (f x).toReal) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hsum
simp only [coe_toReal, ← NNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.hasSum_coe]
exact (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hsum).hasSum
#align ennreal.has_sum_to_real ENNReal.hasSum_toReal
theorem summable_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) : Summable fun x => (f x).toReal :=
(hasSum_toReal hsum).summable
#align ennreal.summable_to_real ENNReal.summable_toReal
end ENNReal
namespace NNReal
theorem tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum {f : β → ℝ≥0} : ∑' b, f b = (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)).toNNReal := by
by_cases h : Summable f
· rw [← ENNReal.coe_tsum h, ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
· have A := tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable h
simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, Classical.not_not] at h
simp only [h, ENNReal.top_toNNReal, A]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_to_nnreal_tsum NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem exists_le_hasSum_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : HasSum f r) :
∃ p ≤ r, HasSum g p :=
have : (∑' b, (g b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≤ r := by
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) ENNReal.summable.hasSum (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 hfr)
exact ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
let ⟨p, Eq, hpr⟩ := ENNReal.le_coe_iff.1 this
⟨p, hpr, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 <| Eq ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum⟩
#align nnreal.exists_le_has_sum_of_le NNReal.exists_le_hasSum_of_le
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem summable_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) : Summable f → Summable g
| ⟨_r, hfr⟩ =>
let ⟨_p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_hasSum_of_le hgf hfr
hp.summable
#align nnreal.summable_of_le NNReal.summable_of_le
/-- Summable non-negative functions have countable support -/
theorem _root_.Summable.countable_support_nnreal (f : α → ℝ≥0) (h : Summable f) :
f.support.Countable := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe] at h
simpa [support] using h.countable_support
/-- A series of non-negative real numbers converges to `r` in the sense of `HasSum` if and only if
the sequence of partial sum converges to `r`. -/
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
rw [← ENNReal.hasSum_coe, ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_finset_sum]
exact ENNReal.tendsto_coe
#align nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat NNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ((tendsto_of_monotone ?_).resolve_right h).comp ?_
exacts [Finset.sum_mono_set _, tendsto_finset_range]
· rintro hnat ⟨r, hr⟩
exact not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop hnat _ (hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat.1 hr)
#align nnreal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop]
#align nnreal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : Summable f := by
refine summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop.2 fun H => ?_
rcases exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop H 0 c with ⟨n, -, hn⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ (hn.trans_le (h n))
#align nnreal.summable_of_sum_range_le NNReal.summable_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le (summable_of_sum_range_le h) h
#align nnreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le NNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {i : β → α}
(hi : Function.Injective i) : (∑' x, f (i x)) ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj i hi (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) (summable_comp_injective hf hi)
hf
#align nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
theorem summable_sigma {β : α → Type*} {f : (Σ x, β x) → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y => f ⟨x, y⟩) ∧ Summable fun x => ∑' y, f ⟨x, y⟩ := by
constructor
· simp only [← NNReal.summable_coe, NNReal.coe_tsum]
exact fun h => ⟨h.sigma_factor, h.sigma⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simpa only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, ENNReal.tsum_sigma',
ENNReal.coe_tsum (h₁ _)] using h₂
#align nnreal.summable_sigma NNReal.summable_sigma
theorem indicator_summable {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (s : Set α) :
Summable (s.indicator f) := by
refine NNReal.summable_of_le (fun a => le_trans (le_of_eq (s.indicator_apply f a)) ?_) hf
split_ifs
· exact le_refl (f a)
· exact zero_le_coe
#align nnreal.indicator_summable NNReal.indicator_summable
theorem tsum_indicator_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {s : Set α} (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :
(∑' x, (s.indicator f) x) ≠ 0 := fun h' =>
let ⟨a, ha, hap⟩ := h
hap ((Set.indicator_apply_eq_self.mpr (absurd ha)).symm.trans
((tsum_eq_zero_iff (indicator_summable hf s)).1 h' a))
#align nnreal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero NNReal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero
open Finset
/-- For `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0`, then `∑' k, f (k + i)` tends to zero. This does not require a summability
assumption on `f`, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0) : Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← tendsto_coe]
convert _root_.tendsto_sum_nat_add fun i => (f i : ℝ)
norm_cast
#align nnreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
nonrec theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
have A : ∀ a : α, (f a : ℝ) ≤ g a := fun a => NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
have : (sf : ℝ) < sg := hasSum_lt A (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hi) (hasSum_coe.2 hf) (hasSum_coe.2 hg)
exact NNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 this
#align nnreal.has_sum_lt NNReal.hasSum_lt
@[mono]
theorem hasSum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg)
(h : f < g) : sf < sg :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
hasSum_lt hle hi hf hg
#align nnreal.has_sum_strict_mono NNReal.hasSum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hg : Summable g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
hasSum_lt h hi (summable_of_le h hg).hasSum hg.hasSum
#align nnreal.tsum_lt_tsum NNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
@[mono]
theorem tsum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (h : f < g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
tsum_lt_tsum hle hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_strict_mono NNReal.tsum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_pos {g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (i : α) (hi : 0 < g i) : 0 < ∑' b, g b := by
rw [← tsum_zero]
exact tsum_lt_tsum (fun a => zero_le _) hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_pos NNReal.tsum_pos
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (i : α) :
∑' x, f x = f i + ∑' x, ite (x = i) 0 (f x) := by
refine tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' i (NNReal.summable_of_le (fun i' => ?_) hf)
rw [Function.update_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_le', le_rfl]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite NNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
theorem tsum_toNNReal_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ ∞) :
(∑' a, f a).toNNReal = ∑' a, (f a).toNNReal :=
(congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal (tsum_congr fun x => (coe_toNNReal (hf x)).symm)).trans
NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_to_nnreal_eq ENNReal.tsum_toNNReal_eq
theorem tsum_toReal_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ ∞) :
(∑' a, f a).toReal = ∑' a, (f a).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, tsum_toNNReal_eq hf, NNReal.coe_tsum]
#align ennreal.tsum_to_real_eq ENNReal.tsum_toReal_eq
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
replace hf : Summable f := tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.summable_nat_add _ hf, ← ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact mod_cast NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add f
#align ennreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le ENNReal.summable h
#align ennreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le ENNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {sf sg : ℝ≥0∞} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hsf : sf ≠ ∞) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
by_cases hsg : sg = ∞
· exact hsg.symm ▸ lt_of_le_of_ne le_top hsf
· have hg' : ∀ x, g x ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (hg.tsum_eq.symm ▸ hsg)
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using fun x =>
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (h x) <| lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (hg' x))
lift g to α → ℝ≥0 using hg'
lift sf to ℝ≥0 using hsf
lift sg to ℝ≥0 using hsg
simp only [coe_le_coe, coe_lt_coe] at h hi ⊢
exact NNReal.hasSum_lt h hi (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 hf) (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 hg)
#align ennreal.has_sum_lt ENNReal.hasSum_lt
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {i : α} (hfi : tsum f ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) : ∑' x, f x < ∑' x, g x :=
hasSum_lt h hi hfi ENNReal.summable.hasSum ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_lt_tsum ENNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
end ENNReal
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Summable f) (hn : ∀ a, 0 ≤ f a)
{i : β → α} (hi : Function.Injective i) : tsum (f ∘ i) ≤ tsum f := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using hn
rw [NNReal.summable_coe] at hf
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), ← NNReal.coe_tsum] using NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hf hi
#align tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
/-- Comparison test of convergence of series of non-negative real numbers. -/
theorem Summable.of_nonneg_of_le {f g : β → ℝ} (hg : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b)
(hf : Summable f) : Summable g := by
lift f to β → ℝ≥0 using fun b => (hg b).trans (hgf b)
lift g to β → ℝ≥0 using hg
rw [NNReal.summable_coe] at hf ⊢
exact NNReal.summable_of_le (fun b => NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 (hgf b)) hf
#align summable_of_nonneg_of_le Summable.of_nonneg_of_le
theorem Summable.toNNReal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Summable f) : Summable fun n => (f n).toNNReal := by
apply NNReal.summable_coe.1
refine .of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => NNReal.coe_nonneg _) (fun n => ?_) hf.abs
simp only [le_abs_self, Real.coe_toNNReal', max_le_iff, abs_nonneg, and_self_iff]
#align summable.to_nnreal Summable.toNNReal
/-- Finitely summable non-negative functions have countable support -/
theorem _root_.Summable.countable_support_ennreal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∑' (i : α), f i ≠ ∞) :
f.support.Countable := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top h
simpa [support] using (ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 h).countable_support_nnreal
/-- A series of non-negative real numbers converges to `r` in the sense of `HasSum` if and only if
the sequence of partial sum converges to `r`. -/
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp only [HasSum, ← NNReal.coe_sum, NNReal.tendsto_coe']
exact exists_congr fun hr => NNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
#align has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg
theorem ENNReal.ofReal_tsum_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf_nonneg : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) (hf : Summable f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (∑' n, f n) = ∑' n, ENNReal.ofReal (f n) := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq (NNReal.hasSum_real_toNNReal_of_nonneg hf_nonneg hf)]
#align ennreal.of_real_tsum_of_nonneg ENNReal.ofReal_tsum_of_nonneg
section
variable [EMetricSpace β]
open ENNReal Filter EMetric
/-- In an emetric ball, the distance between points is everywhere finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball {a : β} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (x y : ball a r) : edist x.1 y.1 ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt <|
calc
edist x y ≤ edist a x + edist a y := edist_triangle_left x.1 y.1 a
_ < r + r := by rw [edist_comm a x, edist_comm a y]; exact add_lt_add x.2 y.2
_ ≤ ∞ := le_top
#align edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball
/-- Each ball in an extended metric space gives us a metric space, as the edist
is everywhere finite. -/
def metricSpaceEMetricBall (a : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : MetricSpace (ball a r) :=
EMetricSpace.toMetricSpace edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball
#align metric_space_emetric_ball metricSpaceEMetricBall
theorem nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball (a x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (h : x ∈ ball a r) :
𝓝 x = map ((↑) : ball a r → β) (𝓝 ⟨x, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds _ <| IsOpen.mem_nhds EMetric.isOpen_ball h).symm
#align nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball
end
section
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
open EMetric
theorem tendsto_iff_edist_tendsto_0 {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} {y : α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => edist (f x) y) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [EMetric.nhds_basis_eball.tendsto_right_iff, EMetric.mem_ball,
@tendsto_order ℝ≥0∞ β _ _, forall_prop_of_false ENNReal.not_lt_zero, forall_const, true_and_iff]
#align tendsto_iff_edist_tendsto_0 tendsto_iff_edist_tendsto_0
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
theorem EMetric.cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0 [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {s : β → α} :
CauchySeq s ↔ ∃ b : β → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ n m N : β, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N) ∧
Tendsto b atTop (𝓝 0) := EMetric.cauchySeq_iff.trans <| by
constructor
· intro hs
/- `s` is Cauchy sequence. Let `b n` be the diameter of the set `s '' Set.Ici n`. -/
refine ⟨fun N => EMetric.diam (s '' Ici N), fun n m N hn hm => ?_, ?_⟩
-- Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
· exact EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem _ hn) (mem_image_of_mem _ hm)
-- Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
· refine ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases hs ε ε0 with ⟨N, hN⟩
refine (eventually_ge_atTop N).mono fun n hn => EMetric.diam_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ _ ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
exact (hN _ (hn.trans hk) _ (hn.trans hl)).le
· rintro ⟨b, ⟨b_bound, b_lim⟩⟩ ε εpos
have : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, b n < ε := b_lim.eventually (gt_mem_nhds εpos)
rcases this.exists with ⟨N, hN⟩
refine ⟨N, fun m hm n hn => ?_⟩
calc edist (s m) (s n) ≤ b N := b_bound m n N hm hn
_ < ε := hN
#align emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0 EMetric.cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0
theorem continuous_of_le_add_edist {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + C * edist x y) : Continuous f := by
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_of_Icc fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases ENNReal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt hC ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
rw [mul_comm] at hδ
filter_upwards [EMetric.closedBall_mem_nhds x (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 δ0)] with y hy
refine ⟨tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| (h x y).trans ?_, (h y x).trans ?_⟩ <;>
refine add_le_add_left (le_trans (mul_le_mul_left' ?_ _) hδ.le) _
exacts [EMetric.mem_closedBall'.1 hy, EMetric.mem_closedBall.1 hy]
#align continuous_of_le_add_edist continuous_of_le_add_edist
theorem continuous_edist : Continuous fun p : α × α => edist p.1 p.2 := by
apply continuous_of_le_add_edist 2 (by decide)
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x x' + edist x' y' + edist y' y := edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
_ = edist x' y' + (edist x x' + edist y y') := by simp only [edist_comm]; ac_rfl
_ ≤ edist x' y' + (edist (x, y) (x', y') + edist (x, y) (x', y')) :=
(add_le_add_left (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) _)
_ = edist x' y' + 2 * edist (x, y) (x', y') := by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
#align continuous_edist continuous_edist
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.edist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => edist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_edist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
#align continuous.edist Continuous.edist
theorem Filter.Tendsto.edist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α} (hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) : Tendsto (fun x => edist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (edist a b)) :=
(continuous_edist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
#align filter.tendsto.edist Filter.Tendsto.edist
/-- If the extended distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated
by a summable series of `NNReal`s, then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ≥0)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : Summable d) : CauchySeq f := by
refine EMetric.cauchySeq_iff_NNReal.2 fun ε εpos ↦ ?_
-- Actually we need partial sums of `d` to be a Cauchy sequence.
replace hd : CauchySeq fun n : ℕ ↦ ∑ x ∈ Finset.range n, d x :=
let ⟨_, H⟩ := hd
H.tendsto_sum_nat.cauchySeq
-- Now we take the same `N` as in one of the definitions of a Cauchy sequence.
refine (Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.1 hd ε (NNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos)).imp fun N hN n hn ↦ ?_
specialize hN n hn
-- We simplify the known inequality.
rw [dist_nndist, NNReal.nndist_eq, ← Finset.sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ hn, add_tsub_cancel_left,
NNReal.coe_lt_coe, max_lt_iff] at hN
rw [edist_comm]
-- Then use `hf` to simplify the goal to the same form.
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le hn fun _ _ ↦ hf _) ?_
exact mod_cast hN.1
#align cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_summable cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : tsum d ≠ ∞) : CauchySeq f := by
lift d to ℕ → NNReal using fun i => ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hd i
rw [ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable] at hd
exact cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable d hf hd
#align cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem EMetric.isClosed_ball {a : α} {r : ℝ≥0∞} : IsClosed (closedBall a r) :=
isClosed_le (continuous_id.edist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align emetric.is_closed_ball EMetric.isClosed_ball
@[simp]
theorem EMetric.diam_closure (s : Set α) : diam (closure s) = diam s := by
refine le_antisymm (diam_le fun x hx y hy => ?_) (diam_mono subset_closure)
have : edist x y ∈ closure (Iic (diam s)) :=
map_mem_closure₂ continuous_edist hx hy fun x hx y hy => edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy
rwa [closure_Iic] at this
#align emetric.diam_closure EMetric.diam_closure
@[simp]
theorem Metric.diam_closure {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (s : Set α) :
Metric.diam (closure s) = diam s := by simp only [Metric.diam, EMetric.diam_closure]
#align metric.diam_closure Metric.diam_closure
theorem isClosed_setOf_lipschitzOnWith {α β} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0)
(s : Set α) : IsClosed { f : α → β | LipschitzOnWith K f s } := by
simp only [LipschitzOnWith, setOf_forall]
refine isClosed_biInter fun x _ => isClosed_biInter fun y _ => isClosed_le ?_ ?_
exacts [.edist (continuous_apply x) (continuous_apply y), continuous_const]
#align is_closed_set_of_lipschitz_on_with isClosed_setOf_lipschitzOnWith
theorem isClosed_setOf_lipschitzWith {α β} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (K : ℝ≥0) :
IsClosed { f : α → β | LipschitzWith K f } := by
simp only [← lipschitzOn_univ, isClosed_setOf_lipschitzOnWith]
#align is_closed_set_of_lipschitz_with isClosed_setOf_lipschitzWith
namespace Real
/-- For a bounded set `s : Set ℝ`, its `EMetric.diam` is equal to `sSup s - sInf s` reinterpreted as
`ℝ≥0∞`. -/
theorem ediam_eq {s : Set ℝ} (h : Bornology.IsBounded s) :
EMetric.diam s = ENNReal.ofReal (sSup s - sInf s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· simp
refine le_antisymm (Metric.ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le fun x hx y hy => ?_) ?_
· exact Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc (h.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup hx) (h.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup hy)
· apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
rw [← Metric.diam, ← Metric.diam_closure]
calc sSup s - sInf s ≤ dist (sSup s) (sInf s) := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ Metric.diam (closure s) := dist_le_diam_of_mem h.closure (csSup_mem_closure hne h.bddAbove)
(csInf_mem_closure hne h.bddBelow)
#align real.ediam_eq Real.ediam_eq
/-- For a bounded set `s : Set ℝ`, its `Metric.diam` is equal to `sSup s - sInf s`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 1,537 | 1,539 | theorem diam_eq {s : Set ℝ} (h : Bornology.IsBounded s) : Metric.diam s = sSup s - sInf s := by |
rw [Metric.diam, Real.ediam_eq h, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
exact sub_nonneg.2 (Real.sInf_le_sSup s h.bddBelow h.bddAbove)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn,
Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-! # getD and getI
This file provides theorems for working with the `getD` and `getI` functions. These are used to
access an element of a list by numerical index, with a default value as a fallback when the index
is out of range.
-/
-- Make sure we haven't imported `Data.Nat.Order.Basic`
assert_not_exists OrderedSub
namespace List
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (l : List α) (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ)
section getD
variable (d : α)
#align list.nthd_nil List.getD_nilₓ -- argument order
#align list.nthd_cons_zero List.getD_cons_zeroₓ -- argument order
#align list.nthd_cons_succ List.getD_cons_succₓ -- argument order
theorem getD_eq_get {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l.length) : l.getD n d = l.get ⟨n, hn⟩ := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp at hn
| cons head tail ih =>
cases n
· exact getD_cons_zero
· exact ih _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/GetD.lean | 47 | 53 | theorem getD_map {n : ℕ} (f : α → β) : (map f l).getD n (f d) = f (l.getD n d) := by |
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => rfl
| cons head tail ih =>
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ih]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sigma
#align_import data.finset.sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Finite sets in a sigma type
This file defines a few `Finset` constructions on `Σ i, α i`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sigma`: Given a finset `s` in `ι` and finsets `t i` in each `α i`, `s.sigma t` is the
finset of the dependent sum `Σ i, α i`
* `Finset.sigmaLift`: Lifts maps `α i → β i → Finset (γ i)` to a map
`Σ i, α i → Σ i, β i → Finset (Σ i, γ i)`.
## TODO
`Finset.sigmaLift` can be generalized to any alternative functor. But to make the generalization
worth it, we must first refactor the functor library so that the `alternative` instance for `Finset`
is computable and universe-polymorphic.
-/
open Function Multiset
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sigma
variable {α : ι → Type*} {β : Type*} (s s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
/-- `s.sigma t` is the finset of dependent pairs `⟨i, a⟩` such that `i ∈ s` and `a ∈ t i`. -/
protected def sigma : Finset (Σi, α i) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.sigma fun i => (t i).nodup⟩
#align finset.sigma Finset.sigma
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sigma {a : Σi, α i} : a ∈ s.sigma t ↔ a.1 ∈ s ∧ a.2 ∈ t a.1 :=
Multiset.mem_sigma
#align finset.mem_sigma Finset.mem_sigma
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
(s.sigma t : Set (Σ i, α i)) = (s : Set ι).sigma fun i ↦ (t i : Set (α i)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_sigma
#align finset.coe_sigma Finset.coe_sigma
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem sigma_nonempty : (s.sigma t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, (t i).Nonempty := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.sigma_nonempty Finset.sigma_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem sigma_eq_empty : s.sigma t = ∅ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, t i = ∅ := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, sigma_nonempty, not_exists, not_and]
#align finset.sigma_eq_empty Finset.sigma_eq_empty
@[mono]
theorem sigma_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : ∀ i, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : s₁.sigma t₁ ⊆ s₂.sigma t₂ :=
fun ⟨i, _⟩ h =>
let ⟨hi, ha⟩ := mem_sigma.1 h
mem_sigma.2 ⟨hs hi, ht i ha⟩
#align finset.sigma_mono Finset.sigma_mono
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk :
(s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i) := by
intro i _ j _ hij
rw [Function.onFun, disjoint_left]
simp_rw [mem_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
rintro _ ⟨y, _, rfl⟩ ⟨z, _, hz'⟩
exact hij (congr_arg Sigma.fst hz'.symm)
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_map_sigma_mk Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk
@[simp]
theorem disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk :
s.disjiUnion (fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i)) pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk =
s.sigma t :=
rfl
#align finset.disj_Union_map_sigma_mk Finset.disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk
theorem sigma_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (Σi, α i)] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
s.sigma t = s.biUnion fun i => (t i).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk i := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm]
#align finset.sigma_eq_bUnion Finset.sigma_eq_biUnion
variable (s t) (f : (Σi, α i) → β)
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sigma.lean | 99 | 104 | theorem sup_sigma [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] :
(s.sigma t).sup f = s.sup fun i => (t i).sup fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩ := by |
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_sigma, and_imp, Sigma.forall]
exact
⟨fun i a hi ha => (le_sup hi).trans' <| le_sup (f := fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) ha, fun i hi a ha =>
le_sup <| mem_sigma.2 ⟨hi, ha⟩⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
#align_import group_theory.perm.list from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Permutations from a list
A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
When there are duplicate elements in `l`, how and in what arrangement with respect to the other
elements they appear in the list determines the formed permutation.
This is because `List.formPerm` is implemented as a product of `Equiv.swap`s.
That means that presence of a sublist of two adjacent duplicates like `[..., x, x, ...]`
will produce the same permutation as if the adjacent duplicates were not present.
The `List.formPerm` definition is meant to primarily be used with `Nodup l`, so that
the resulting permutation is cyclic (if `l` has at least two elements).
The presence of duplicates in a particular placement can lead `List.formPerm` to produce a
nontrivial permutation that is noncyclic.
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section FormPerm
variable [DecidableEq α] (l : List α)
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
/-- A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
-/
def formPerm : Equiv.Perm α :=
(zipWith Equiv.swap l l.tail).prod
#align list.form_perm List.formPerm
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_nil : formPerm ([] : List α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align list.form_perm_nil List.formPerm_nil
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_singleton (x : α) : formPerm [x] = 1 :=
rfl
#align list.form_perm_singleton List.formPerm_singleton
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_cons (x y : α) (l : List α) :
formPerm (x :: y :: l) = swap x y * formPerm (y :: l) :=
prod_cons
#align list.form_perm_cons_cons List.formPerm_cons_cons
theorem formPerm_pair (x y : α) : formPerm [x, y] = swap x y :=
rfl
#align list.form_perm_pair List.formPerm_pair
theorem mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne : ∀ {l l' : List α} {x : α},
(zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x → x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ l'
| [], _, _ => by simp
| _, [], _ => by simp
| a::l, b::l', x => fun hx ↦
if h : (zipWith swap l l').prod x = x then
(eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self (by simpa [h] using hx)).imp
(by rintro rfl; exact .head _) (by rintro rfl; exact .head _)
else
(mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h).imp (.tail _) (.tail _)
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support' (l l' : List α) :
{ x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := fun _ h ↦ by
simpa using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
#align list.zip_with_swap_prod_support' List.zipWith_swap_prod_support'
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support [Fintype α] (l l' : List α) :
(zipWith swap l l').prod.support ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using zipWith_swap_prod_support' _ _ hx'
#align list.zip_with_swap_prod_support List.zipWith_swap_prod_support
theorem support_formPerm_le' : { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset := by
refine (zipWith_swap_prod_support' l l.tail).trans ?_
simpa [Finset.subset_iff] using tail_subset l
#align list.support_form_perm_le' List.support_formPerm_le'
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/List.lean | 100 | 103 | theorem support_formPerm_le [Fintype α] : support (formPerm l) ≤ l.toFinset := by |
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using support_formPerm_le' _ hx'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex Kontorovich and Heather Macbeth and Marc Masdeu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth, Marc Masdeu
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
#align_import number_theory.modular from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# The action of the modular group SL(2, ℤ) on the upper half-plane
We define the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ` (via restriction of the `SL(2,ℝ)` action in
`Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane`). We then define the standard fundamental domain
(`ModularGroup.fd`, `𝒟`) for this action and show
(`ModularGroup.exists_smul_mem_fd`) that any point in `ℍ` can be
moved inside `𝒟`.
## Main definitions
The standard (closed) fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`, denoted `𝒟`:
`fd := {z | 1 ≤ (z : ℂ).normSq ∧ |z.re| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 2}`
The standard open fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`, denoted `𝒟ᵒ`:
`fdo := {z | 1 < (z : ℂ).normSq ∧ |z.re| < (1 : ℝ) / 2}`
These notations are localized in the `Modular` locale and can be enabled via `open scoped Modular`.
## Main results
Any `z : ℍ` can be moved to `𝒟` by an element of `SL(2,ℤ)`:
`exists_smul_mem_fd (z : ℍ) : ∃ g : SL(2,ℤ), g • z ∈ 𝒟`
If both `z` and `γ • z` are in the open domain `𝒟ᵒ` then `z = γ • z`:
`eq_smul_self_of_mem_fdo_mem_fdo {z : ℍ} {g : SL(2,ℤ)} (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (hg : g • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : z = g • z`
# Discussion
Standard proofs make use of the identity
`g • z = a / c - 1 / (c (cz + d))`
for `g = [[a, b], [c, d]]` in `SL(2)`, but this requires separate handling of whether `c = 0`.
Instead, our proof makes use of the following perhaps novel identity (see
`ModularGroup.smul_eq_lcRow0_add`):
`g • z = (a c + b d) / (c^2 + d^2) + (d z - c) / ((c^2 + d^2) (c z + d))`
where there is no issue of division by zero.
Another feature is that we delay until the very end the consideration of special matrices
`T=[[1,1],[0,1]]` (see `ModularGroup.T`) and `S=[[0,-1],[1,0]]` (see `ModularGroup.S`), by
instead using abstract theory on the properness of certain maps (phrased in terms of the filters
`Filter.cocompact`, `Filter.cofinite`, etc) to deduce existence theorems, first to prove the
existence of `g` maximizing `(g•z).im` (see `ModularGroup.exists_max_im`), and then among
those, to minimize `|(g•z).re|` (see `ModularGroup.exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re`).
-/
open Complex hiding abs_two
open Matrix hiding mul_smul
open Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup UpperHalfPlane ModularGroup
noncomputable section
local notation "SL(" n ", " R ")" => SpecialLinearGroup (Fin n) R
local macro "↑ₘ" t:term:80 : term => `(term| ($t : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℤ))
open scoped UpperHalfPlane ComplexConjugate
namespace ModularGroup
variable {g : SL(2, ℤ)} (z : ℍ)
section BottomRow
/-- The two numbers `c`, `d` in the "bottom_row" of `g=[[*,*],[c,d]]` in `SL(2, ℤ)` are coprime. -/
theorem bottom_row_coprime {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (g : SL(2, R)) :
IsCoprime ((↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1 0) ((↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1 1) := by
use -(↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 0 1, (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 0 0
rw [add_comm, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← det_fin_two]
exact g.det_coe
#align modular_group.bottom_row_coprime ModularGroup.bottom_row_coprime
/-- Every pair `![c, d]` of coprime integers is the "bottom_row" of some element `g=[[*,*],[c,d]]`
of `SL(2,ℤ)`. -/
theorem bottom_row_surj {R : Type*} [CommRing R] :
Set.SurjOn (fun g : SL(2, R) => (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1) Set.univ
{cd | IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)} := by
rintro cd ⟨b₀, a, gcd_eqn⟩
let A := of ![![a, -b₀], cd]
have det_A_1 : det A = 1 := by
convert gcd_eqn
rw [det_fin_two]
simp [A, (by ring : a * cd 1 + b₀ * cd 0 = b₀ * cd 0 + a * cd 1)]
refine ⟨⟨A, det_A_1⟩, Set.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
ext; simp [A]
#align modular_group.bottom_row_surj ModularGroup.bottom_row_surj
end BottomRow
section TendstoLemmas
open Filter ContinuousLinearMap
attribute [local simp] ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul
/-- The function `(c,d) → |cz+d|^2` is proper, that is, preimages of bounded-above sets are finite.
-/
theorem tendsto_normSq_coprime_pair :
Filter.Tendsto (fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => normSq ((p 0 : ℂ) * z + p 1)) cofinite atTop := by
-- using this instance rather than the automatic `Function.module` makes unification issues in
-- `LinearEquiv.closedEmbedding_of_injective` less bad later in the proof.
letI : Module ℝ (Fin 2 → ℝ) := NormedSpace.toModule
let π₀ : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := LinearMap.proj 0
let π₁ : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := LinearMap.proj 1
let f : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ := π₀.smulRight (z : ℂ) + π₁.smulRight 1
have f_def : ⇑f = fun p : Fin 2 → ℝ => (p 0 : ℂ) * ↑z + p 1 := by
ext1
dsimp only [π₀, π₁, f, LinearMap.coe_proj, real_smul, LinearMap.coe_smulRight,
LinearMap.add_apply]
rw [mul_one]
have :
(fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => normSq ((p 0 : ℂ) * ↑z + ↑(p 1))) =
normSq ∘ f ∘ fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) ∘ p := by
ext1
rw [f_def]
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
rw [ofReal_intCast, ofReal_intCast]
rw [this]
have hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥ := by
let g : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] Fin 2 → ℝ :=
LinearMap.pi ![imLm, imLm.comp ((z : ℂ) • ((conjAe : ℂ →ₐ[ℝ] ℂ) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ))]
suffices ((z : ℂ).im⁻¹ • g).comp f = LinearMap.id by exact LinearMap.ker_eq_bot_of_inverse this
apply LinearMap.ext
intro c
have hz : (z : ℂ).im ≠ 0 := z.2.ne'
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.id_apply]
ext i
dsimp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.pi_apply, smul_eq_mul]
fin_cases i
· show (z : ℂ).im⁻¹ * (f c).im = c 0
rw [f_def, add_im, im_ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, add_zero, mul_left_comm, inv_mul_cancel hz,
mul_one]
· show (z : ℂ).im⁻¹ * ((z : ℂ) * conj (f c)).im = c 1
rw [f_def, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, mul_add, mul_left_comm, mul_conj, conj_ofReal,
conj_ofReal, ← ofReal_mul, add_im, ofReal_im, zero_add, inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ hz]
simp only [ofReal_im, ofReal_re, mul_im, zero_add, mul_zero]
have hf' : ClosedEmbedding f := f.closedEmbedding_of_injective hf
have h₂ : Tendsto (fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) ∘ p) cofinite (cocompact _) := by
convert Tendsto.pi_map_coprodᵢ fun _ => Int.tendsto_coe_cofinite
· rw [coprodᵢ_cofinite]
· rw [coprodᵢ_cocompact]
exact tendsto_normSq_cocompact_atTop.comp (hf'.tendsto_cocompact.comp h₂)
#align modular_group.tendsto_norm_sq_coprime_pair ModularGroup.tendsto_normSq_coprime_pair
/-- Given `coprime_pair` `p=(c,d)`, the matrix `[[a,b],[*,*]]` is sent to `a*c+b*d`.
This is the linear map version of this operation.
-/
def lcRow0 (p : Fin 2 → ℤ) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
((p 0 : ℝ) • LinearMap.proj (0 : Fin 2) +
(p 1 : ℝ) • LinearMap.proj (1 : Fin 2) : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ).comp
(LinearMap.proj 0)
#align modular_group.lc_row0 ModularGroup.lcRow0
@[simp]
theorem lcRow0_apply (p : Fin 2 → ℤ) (g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ) :
lcRow0 p g = p 0 * g 0 0 + p 1 * g 0 1 :=
rfl
#align modular_group.lc_row0_apply ModularGroup.lcRow0_apply
/-- Linear map sending the matrix [a, b; c, d] to the matrix [ac₀ + bd₀, - ad₀ + bc₀; c, d], for
some fixed `(c₀, d₀)`. -/
@[simps!]
def lcRow0Extend {cd : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hcd : IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)) :
Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ ≃ₗ[ℝ] Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ :=
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight
![by
refine
LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.generalLinearEquiv ℝ (Fin 2 → ℝ)
(GeneralLinearGroup.toLinear (planeConformalMatrix (cd 0 : ℝ) (-(cd 1 : ℝ)) ?_))
norm_cast
rw [neg_sq]
exact hcd.sq_add_sq_ne_zero, LinearEquiv.refl ℝ (Fin 2 → ℝ)]
#align modular_group.lc_row0_extend ModularGroup.lcRow0Extend
-- `simpNF` times out, but only in CI where all of `Mathlib` is imported
attribute [nolint simpNF] lcRow0Extend_apply lcRow0Extend_symm_apply
/-- The map `lcRow0` is proper, that is, preimages of cocompact sets are finite in
`[[* , *], [c, d]]`. -/
theorem tendsto_lcRow0 {cd : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hcd : IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)) :
Tendsto (fun g : { g : SL(2, ℤ) // (↑ₘg) 1 = cd } => lcRow0 cd ↑(↑g : SL(2, ℝ))) cofinite
(cocompact ℝ) := by
let mB : ℝ → Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ := fun t => of ![![t, (-(1 : ℤ) : ℝ)], (↑) ∘ cd]
have hmB : Continuous mB := by
refine continuous_matrix ?_
simp only [mB, Fin.forall_fin_two, continuous_const, continuous_id', of_apply, cons_val_zero,
cons_val_one, and_self_iff]
refine Filter.Tendsto.of_tendsto_comp ?_ (comap_cocompact_le hmB)
let f₁ : SL(2, ℤ) → Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ := fun g =>
Matrix.map (↑g : Matrix _ _ ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ)
have cocompact_ℝ_to_cofinite_ℤ_matrix :
Tendsto (fun m : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℤ => Matrix.map m ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ)) cofinite
(cocompact _) := by
simpa only [coprodᵢ_cofinite, coprodᵢ_cocompact] using
Tendsto.pi_map_coprodᵢ fun _ : Fin 2 =>
Tendsto.pi_map_coprodᵢ fun _ : Fin 2 => Int.tendsto_coe_cofinite
have hf₁ : Tendsto f₁ cofinite (cocompact _) :=
cocompact_ℝ_to_cofinite_ℤ_matrix.comp Subtype.coe_injective.tendsto_cofinite
have hf₂ : ClosedEmbedding (lcRow0Extend hcd) :=
(lcRow0Extend hcd).toContinuousLinearEquiv.toHomeomorph.closedEmbedding
convert hf₂.tendsto_cocompact.comp (hf₁.comp Subtype.coe_injective.tendsto_cofinite) using 1
ext ⟨g, rfl⟩ i j : 3
fin_cases i <;> [fin_cases j; skip]
-- the following are proved by `simp`, but it is replaced by `simp only` to avoid timeouts.
· simp only [mB, mulVec, dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_two, coe_matrix_coe,
Int.coe_castRingHom, lcRow0_apply, Function.comp_apply, cons_val_zero, lcRow0Extend_apply,
LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.coeFn_generalLinearEquiv, GeneralLinearGroup.coe_toLinear,
val_planeConformalMatrix, neg_neg, mulVecLin_apply, cons_val_one, head_cons, of_apply,
Fin.mk_zero, Fin.mk_one]
· convert congr_arg (fun n : ℤ => (-n : ℝ)) g.det_coe.symm using 1
simp only [f₁, mulVec, dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_two, Matrix.det_fin_two, Function.comp_apply,
Subtype.coe_mk, lcRow0Extend_apply, cons_val_zero,
LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.coeFn_generalLinearEquiv, GeneralLinearGroup.coe_toLinear,
val_planeConformalMatrix, mulVecLin_apply, cons_val_one, head_cons, map_apply, neg_mul,
Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_mul, neg_sub, of_apply, Fin.mk_zero, Fin.mk_one]
ring
· rfl
#align modular_group.tendsto_lc_row0 ModularGroup.tendsto_lcRow0
/-- This replaces `(g•z).re = a/c + *` in the standard theory with the following novel identity:
`g • z = (a c + b d) / (c^2 + d^2) + (d z - c) / ((c^2 + d^2) (c z + d))`
which does not need to be decomposed depending on whether `c = 0`. -/
theorem smul_eq_lcRow0_add {p : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hp : IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)) (hg : (↑ₘg) 1 = p) :
↑(g • z) =
(lcRow0 p ↑(g : SL(2, ℝ)) : ℂ) / ((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) +
((p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0) / (((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * (p 0 * z + p 1)) := by
have nonZ1 : (p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2 ≠ 0 := mod_cast hp.sq_add_sq_ne_zero
have : ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) ∘ p ≠ 0 := fun h => hp.ne_zero (by ext i; simpa using congr_fun h i)
have nonZ2 : (p 0 : ℂ) * z + p 1 ≠ 0 := by simpa using linear_ne_zero _ z this
field_simp [nonZ1, nonZ2, denom_ne_zero, num]
rw [(by simp :
(p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0 = (p 1 * z - p 0) * ↑(Matrix.det (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℤ)))]
rw [← hg, det_fin_two]
simp only [Int.coe_castRingHom, coe_matrix_coe, Int.cast_mul, ofReal_intCast, map_apply, denom,
Int.cast_sub, coe_GLPos_coe_GL_coe_matrix, coe'_apply_complex]
ring
#align modular_group.smul_eq_lc_row0_add ModularGroup.smul_eq_lcRow0_add
theorem tendsto_abs_re_smul {p : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hp : IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)) :
Tendsto
(fun g : { g : SL(2, ℤ) // (↑ₘg) 1 = p } => |((g : SL(2, ℤ)) • z).re|) cofinite atTop := by
suffices
Tendsto (fun g : (fun g : SL(2, ℤ) => (↑ₘg) 1) ⁻¹' {p} => ((g : SL(2, ℤ)) • z).re) cofinite
(cocompact ℝ)
by exact tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop.comp this
have : ((p 0 : ℝ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ ≠ 0 := by
apply inv_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.sq_add_sq_ne_zero
let f := Homeomorph.mulRight₀ _ this
let ff := Homeomorph.addRight
(((p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0) / (((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * (p 0 * z + p 1))).re
convert (f.trans ff).closedEmbedding.tendsto_cocompact.comp (tendsto_lcRow0 hp) with _ _ g
change
((g : SL(2, ℤ)) • z).re =
lcRow0 p ↑(↑g : SL(2, ℝ)) / ((p 0 : ℝ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℝ) ^ 2) +
Complex.re (((p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0) / (((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * (p 0 * z + p 1)))
exact mod_cast congr_arg Complex.re (smul_eq_lcRow0_add z hp g.2)
#align modular_group.tendsto_abs_re_smul ModularGroup.tendsto_abs_re_smul
end TendstoLemmas
section FundamentalDomain
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
attribute [local simp] UpperHalfPlane.coe_smul re_smul
/-- For `z : ℍ`, there is a `g : SL(2,ℤ)` maximizing `(g•z).im` -/
theorem exists_max_im : ∃ g : SL(2, ℤ), ∀ g' : SL(2, ℤ), (g' • z).im ≤ (g • z).im := by
classical
let s : Set (Fin 2 → ℤ) := {cd | IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)}
have hs : s.Nonempty := ⟨![1, 1], isCoprime_one_left⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp_coprime, hp⟩ :=
Filter.Tendsto.exists_within_forall_le hs (tendsto_normSq_coprime_pair z)
obtain ⟨g, -, hg⟩ := bottom_row_surj hp_coprime
refine ⟨g, fun g' => ?_⟩
rw [ModularGroup.im_smul_eq_div_normSq, ModularGroup.im_smul_eq_div_normSq,
div_le_div_left]
· simpa [← hg] using hp ((↑ₘg') 1) (bottom_row_coprime g')
· exact z.im_pos
· exact normSq_denom_pos g' z
· exact normSq_denom_pos g z
#align modular_group.exists_max_im ModularGroup.exists_max_im
/-- Given `z : ℍ` and a bottom row `(c,d)`, among the `g : SL(2,ℤ)` with this bottom row, minimize
`|(g•z).re|`. -/
theorem exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re {cd : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hcd : IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)) :
∃ g : SL(2, ℤ), (↑ₘg) 1 = cd ∧ ∀ g' : SL(2, ℤ), (↑ₘg) 1 = (↑ₘg') 1 →
|(g • z).re| ≤ |(g' • z).re| := by
haveI : Nonempty { g : SL(2, ℤ) // (↑ₘg) 1 = cd } :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := bottom_row_surj hcd
⟨⟨x, hx.2⟩⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := Filter.Tendsto.exists_forall_le (tendsto_abs_re_smul z hcd)
refine ⟨g, g.2, ?_⟩
intro g1 hg1
have : g1 ∈ (fun g : SL(2, ℤ) => (↑ₘg) 1) ⁻¹' {cd} := by
rw [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
exact Eq.trans hg1.symm (Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp (Set.mem_preimage.mp g.2))
exact hg ⟨g1, this⟩
#align modular_group.exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re ModularGroup.exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re
theorem coe_T_zpow_smul_eq {n : ℤ} : (↑(T ^ n • z) : ℂ) = z + n := by
rw [sl_moeb, UpperHalfPlane.coe_smul]
simp [coe_T_zpow, denom, num, -map_zpow]
#align modular_group.coe_T_zpow_smul_eq ModularGroup.coe_T_zpow_smul_eq
theorem re_T_zpow_smul (n : ℤ) : (T ^ n • z).re = z.re + n := by
rw [← coe_re, coe_T_zpow_smul_eq, add_re, intCast_re, coe_re]
#align modular_group.re_T_zpow_smul ModularGroup.re_T_zpow_smul
theorem im_T_zpow_smul (n : ℤ) : (T ^ n • z).im = z.im := by
rw [← coe_im, coe_T_zpow_smul_eq, add_im, intCast_im, add_zero, coe_im]
#align modular_group.im_T_zpow_smul ModularGroup.im_T_zpow_smul
theorem re_T_smul : (T • z).re = z.re + 1 := by simpa using re_T_zpow_smul z 1
#align modular_group.re_T_smul ModularGroup.re_T_smul
theorem im_T_smul : (T • z).im = z.im := by simpa using im_T_zpow_smul z 1
#align modular_group.im_T_smul ModularGroup.im_T_smul
theorem re_T_inv_smul : (T⁻¹ • z).re = z.re - 1 := by simpa using re_T_zpow_smul z (-1)
#align modular_group.re_T_inv_smul ModularGroup.re_T_inv_smul
theorem im_T_inv_smul : (T⁻¹ • z).im = z.im := by simpa using im_T_zpow_smul z (-1)
#align modular_group.im_T_inv_smul ModularGroup.im_T_inv_smul
variable {z}
-- If instead we had `g` and `T` of type `PSL(2, ℤ)`, then we could simply state `g = T^n`.
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Modular.lean | 349 | 361 | theorem exists_eq_T_zpow_of_c_eq_zero (hc : (↑ₘg) 1 0 = 0) :
∃ n : ℤ, ∀ z : ℍ, g • z = T ^ n • z := by |
have had := g.det_coe
replace had : (↑ₘg) 0 0 * (↑ₘg) 1 1 = 1 := by rw [det_fin_two, hc] at had; linarith
rcases Int.eq_one_or_neg_one_of_mul_eq_one' had with (⟨ha, hd⟩ | ⟨ha, hd⟩)
· use (↑ₘg) 0 1
suffices g = T ^ (↑ₘg) 0 1 by intro z; conv_lhs => rw [this]
ext i j; fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;>
simp [ha, hc, hd, coe_T_zpow, show (1 : Fin (0 + 2)) = (1 : Fin 2) from rfl]
· use -((↑ₘg) 0 1)
suffices g = -T ^ (-((↑ₘg) 0 1)) by intro z; conv_lhs => rw [this, SL_neg_smul]
ext i j; fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;>
simp [ha, hc, hd, coe_T_zpow, show (1 : Fin (0 + 2)) = (1 : Fin 2) from rfl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.affine_subspace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e96bdfbd1e8c98a09ff75f7ac6204d142debc840"
/-!
# Affine spaces
This file defines affine subspaces (over modules) and the affine span of a set of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineSubspace k P` is the type of affine subspaces. Unlike affine spaces, affine subspaces are
allowed to be empty, and lemmas that do not apply to empty affine subspaces have `Nonempty`
hypotheses. There is a `CompleteLattice` structure on affine subspaces.
* `AffineSubspace.direction` gives the `Submodule` spanned by the pairwise differences of points
in an `AffineSubspace`. There are various lemmas relating to the set of vectors in the
`direction`, and relating the lattice structure on affine subspaces to that on their directions.
* `AffineSubspace.parallel`, notation `∥`, gives the property of two affine subspaces being
parallel (one being a translate of the other).
* `affineSpan` gives the affine subspace spanned by a set of points, with `vectorSpan` giving its
direction. The `affineSpan` is defined in terms of `spanPoints`, which gives an explicit
description of the points contained in the affine span; `spanPoints` itself should generally only
be used when that description is required, with `affineSpan` being the main definition for other
purposes. Two other descriptions of the affine span are proved equivalent: it is the `sInf` of
affine subspaces containing the points, and (if `[Nontrivial k]`) it contains exactly those points
that are affine combinations of points in the given set.
## Implementation notes
`outParam` is used in the definition of `AddTorsor V P` to make `V` an implicit argument (deduced
from `P`) in most cases. As for modules, `k` is an explicit argument rather than implied by `P` or
`V`.
This file only provides purely algebraic definitions and results. Those depending on analysis or
topology are defined elsewhere; see `Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor` and `Topology.Algebra.Affine`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
open Set
section
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P]
/-- The submodule spanning the differences of a (possibly empty) set of points. -/
def vectorSpan (s : Set P) : Submodule k V :=
Submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s)
#align vector_span vectorSpan
/-- The definition of `vectorSpan`, for rewriting. -/
theorem vectorSpan_def (s : Set P) : vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s) :=
rfl
#align vector_span_def vectorSpan_def
/-- `vectorSpan` is monotone. -/
theorem vectorSpan_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : vectorSpan k s₁ ≤ vectorSpan k s₂ :=
Submodule.span_mono (vsub_self_mono h)
#align vector_span_mono vectorSpan_mono
variable (P)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem vectorSpan_empty : vectorSpan k (∅ : Set P) = (⊥ : Submodule k V) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def, vsub_empty, Submodule.span_empty]
#align vector_span_empty vectorSpan_empty
variable {P}
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a single point is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem vectorSpan_singleton (p : P) : vectorSpan k ({p} : Set P) = ⊥ := by simp [vectorSpan_def]
#align vector_span_singleton vectorSpan_singleton
/-- The `s -ᵥ s` lies within the `vectorSpan k s`. -/
theorem vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan (s : Set P) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ ↑(vectorSpan k s) :=
Submodule.subset_span
#align vsub_set_subset_vector_span vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan {s : Set P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vectorSpan k s :=
vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan k s (vsub_mem_vsub hp1 hp2)
#align vsub_mem_vector_span vsub_mem_vectorSpan
/-- The points in the affine span of a (possibly empty) set of points. Use `affineSpan` instead to
get an `AffineSubspace k P`. -/
def spanPoints (s : Set P) : Set P :=
{ p | ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ v ∈ vectorSpan k s, p = v +ᵥ p1 }
#align span_points spanPoints
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
theorem mem_spanPoints (p : P) (s : Set P) : p ∈ s → p ∈ spanPoints k s
| hp => ⟨p, hp, 0, Submodule.zero_mem _, (zero_vadd V p).symm⟩
#align mem_span_points mem_spanPoints
/-- A set is contained in its `spanPoints`. -/
theorem subset_spanPoints (s : Set P) : s ⊆ spanPoints k s := fun p => mem_spanPoints k p s
#align subset_span_points subset_spanPoints
/-- The `spanPoints` of a set is nonempty if and only if that set is. -/
@[simp]
theorem spanPoints_nonempty (s : Set P) : (spanPoints k s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
constructor
· contrapose
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
intro h
simp [h, spanPoints]
· exact fun h => h.mono (subset_spanPoints _ _)
#align span_points_nonempty spanPoints_nonempty
/-- Adding a point in the affine span and a vector in the spanning submodule produces a point in the
affine span. -/
theorem vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan {s : Set P} {p : P} {v : V}
(hp : p ∈ spanPoints k s) (hv : v ∈ vectorSpan k s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ spanPoints k s := by
rcases hp with ⟨p2, ⟨hp2, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rw [hv2p, vadd_vadd]
exact ⟨p2, hp2, v + v2, (vectorSpan k s).add_mem hv hv2, rfl⟩
#align vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan
/-- Subtracting two points in the affine span produces a vector in the spanning submodule. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints {s : Set P} {p1 p2 : P}
(hp1 : p1 ∈ spanPoints k s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ spanPoints k s) : p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vectorSpan k s := by
rcases hp1 with ⟨p1a, ⟨hp1a, ⟨v1, ⟨hv1, hv1p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rcases hp2 with ⟨p2a, ⟨hp2a, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩
rw [hv1p, hv2p, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (v1 +ᵥ p1a), vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc]
have hv1v2 : v1 - v2 ∈ vectorSpan k s := (vectorSpan k s).sub_mem hv1 hv2
refine (vectorSpan k s).add_mem ?_ hv1v2
exact vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp1a hp2a
#align vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints
end
/-- An `AffineSubspace k P` is a subset of an `AffineSpace V P` that, if not empty, has an affine
space structure induced by a corresponding subspace of the `Module k V`. -/
structure AffineSubspace (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module k V] [AffineSpace V P] where
/-- The affine subspace seen as a subset. -/
carrier : Set P
smul_vsub_vadd_mem :
∀ (c : k) {p1 p2 p3 : P},
p1 ∈ carrier → p2 ∈ carrier → p3 ∈ carrier → c • (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) +ᵥ p3 ∈ carrier
#align affine_subspace AffineSubspace
namespace Submodule
variable {k V : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
/-- Reinterpret `p : Submodule k V` as an `AffineSubspace k V`. -/
def toAffineSubspace (p : Submodule k V) : AffineSubspace k V where
carrier := p
smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ h₃ := p.add_mem (p.smul_mem _ (p.sub_mem h₁ h₂)) h₃
#align submodule.to_affine_subspace Submodule.toAffineSubspace
end Submodule
namespace AffineSubspace
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
instance : SetLike (AffineSubspace k P) P where
coe := carrier
coe_injective' p q _ := by cases p; cases q; congr
/-- A point is in an affine subspace coerced to a set if and only if it is in that affine
subspace. -/
-- Porting note: removed `simp`, proof is `simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]`
theorem mem_coe (p : P) (s : AffineSubspace k P) : p ∈ (s : Set P) ↔ p ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.mem_coe AffineSubspace.mem_coe
variable {k P}
/-- The direction of an affine subspace is the submodule spanned by
the pairwise differences of points. (Except in the case of an empty
affine subspace, where the direction is the zero submodule, every
vector in the direction is the difference of two points in the affine
subspace.) -/
def direction (s : AffineSubspace k P) : Submodule k V :=
vectorSpan k (s : Set P)
#align affine_subspace.direction AffineSubspace.direction
/-- The direction equals the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem direction_eq_vectorSpan (s : AffineSubspace k P) : s.direction = vectorSpan k (s : Set P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.direction_eq_vector_span AffineSubspace.direction_eq_vectorSpan
/-- Alternative definition of the direction when the affine subspace is nonempty. This is defined so
that the order on submodules (as used in the definition of `Submodule.span`) can be used in the
proof of `coe_direction_eq_vsub_set`, and is not intended to be used beyond that proof. -/
def directionOfNonempty {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) : Submodule k V where
carrier := (s : Set P) -ᵥ s
zero_mem' := by
cases' h with p hp
exact vsub_self p ▸ vsub_mem_vsub hp hp
add_mem' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩ ⟨p3, hp3, p4, hp4, rfl⟩
rw [← vadd_vsub_assoc]
refine vsub_mem_vsub ?_ hp4
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp3
rw [one_smul]
smul_mem' := by
rintro c _ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩
rw [← vadd_vsub (c • (p1 -ᵥ p2)) p2]
refine vsub_mem_vsub ?_ hp2
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1 hp2 hp2
#align affine_subspace.direction_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.directionOfNonempty
/-- `direction_of_nonempty` gives the same submodule as `direction`. -/
theorem directionOfNonempty_eq_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
directionOfNonempty h = s.direction := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_le.2 Set.Subset.rfl)
rw [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, directionOfNonempty, direction, Submodule.coe_set_mk,
AddSubmonoid.coe_set_mk]
exact vsub_set_subset_vectorSpan k _
#align affine_subspace.direction_of_nonempty_eq_direction AffineSubspace.directionOfNonempty_eq_direction
/-- The set of vectors in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace is given by `vsub_set`. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (s : Set P) -ᵥ s :=
directionOfNonempty_eq_direction h ▸ rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set
/-- A vector is in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace if and only if it is the subtraction
of two vectors in the subspace. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p1 -ᵥ p2 := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set h, Set.mem_vsub]
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, eq_comm]
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point in the subspace produces a point in the
subspace. -/
theorem vadd_mem_of_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub ⟨p, hp⟩] at hv
rcases hv with ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩
rw [hv]
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp
rw [one_smul]
exact s.mem_coe k P _
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction
/-- Subtracting two points in the subspace produces a vector in the direction. -/
theorem vsub_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction :=
vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp1 hp2
#align affine_subspace.vsub_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vsub_mem_direction
/-- Adding a vector to a point in a subspace produces a point in the subspace if and only if the
vector is in the direction. -/
theorem vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} (v : V) {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ v ∈ s.direction :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using vsub_mem_direction h hp, fun h => vadd_mem_of_mem_direction h hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point produces a point in the subspace if and only if
the original point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction {s : AffineSubspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction)
{p : P} : v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ p ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv h⟩
convert vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) h
simp
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its direction equals the set of
vectors subtracting that point on the right. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (· -ᵥ p) '' s := by
rw [coe_direction_eq_vsub_set ⟨p, hp⟩]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p1 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (vsub_mem_direction hp1 hp2) hp, vadd_vsub _ _⟩
· rintro v ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p2, hp2, p, hp, rfl⟩
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its direction equals the set of
vectors subtracting that point on the left. -/
theorem coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : Set V) = (p -ᵥ ·) '' s := by
ext v
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← Submodule.neg_mem_iff, ← SetLike.mem_coe,
coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_image]
conv_lhs =>
congr
ext
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_inj]
#align affine_subspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction if and only if it results from
subtracting that point on the right. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p2 -ᵥ p := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp]
exact ⟨fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction if and only if it results from
subtracting that point on the left. -/
theorem mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p -ᵥ p2 := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left hp]
exact ⟨fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, fun ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩ => ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left AffineSubspace.mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that point on the right is in the
direction if and only if the other point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p2 -ᵥ p ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right hp]
simp
#align affine_subspace.vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem AffineSubspace.vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that point on the left is in the
direction if and only if the other point is in the subspace. -/
theorem vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s := by
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left hp]
simp
#align affine_subspace.vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem AffineSubspace.vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem
/-- Two affine subspaces are equal if they have the same points. -/
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : AffineSubspace k P → Set P) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
#align affine_subspace.coe_injective AffineSubspace.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : AffineSubspace k P} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ q) : p = q :=
SetLike.ext h
#align affine_subspace.ext AffineSubspace.ext
-- Porting note: removed `simp`, proof is `simp only [SetLike.ext'_iff]`
theorem ext_iff (s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P) : (s₁ : Set P) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.symm
#align affine_subspace.ext_iff AffineSubspace.ext_iff
/-- Two affine subspaces with the same direction and nonempty intersection are equal. -/
theorem ext_of_direction_eq {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (hd : s1.direction = s2.direction)
(hn : ((s1 : Set P) ∩ s2).Nonempty) : s1 = s2 := by
ext p
have hq1 := Set.mem_of_mem_inter_left hn.some_mem
have hq2 := Set.mem_of_mem_inter_right hn.some_mem
constructor
· intro hp
rw [← vsub_vadd p hn.some]
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq2
rw [← hd]
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq1
· intro hp
rw [← vsub_vadd p hn.some]
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq1
rw [hd]
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq2
#align affine_subspace.ext_of_direction_eq AffineSubspace.ext_of_direction_eq
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- This is not an instance because it loops with `AddTorsor.nonempty`. -/
abbrev toAddTorsor (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : AddTorsor s.direction s where
vadd a b := ⟨(a : V) +ᵥ (b : P), vadd_mem_of_mem_direction a.2 b.2⟩
zero_vadd := fun a => by
ext
exact zero_vadd _ _
add_vadd a b c := by
ext
apply add_vadd
vsub a b := ⟨(a : P) -ᵥ (b : P), (vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem a.2 _).mpr b.2⟩
vsub_vadd' a b := by
ext
apply AddTorsor.vsub_vadd'
vadd_vsub' a b := by
ext
apply AddTorsor.vadd_vsub'
#align affine_subspace.to_add_torsor AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
attribute [local instance] toAddTorsor
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_vsub (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (a b : s) : ↑(a -ᵥ b) = (a : P) -ᵥ (b : P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_vsub AffineSubspace.coe_vsub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_vadd (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (a : s.direction) (b : s) :
↑(a +ᵥ b) = (a : V) +ᵥ (b : P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_vadd AffineSubspace.coe_vadd
/-- Embedding of an affine subspace to the ambient space, as an affine map. -/
protected def subtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : s →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun := (↑)
linear := s.direction.subtype
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype AffineSubspace.subtype
@[simp]
theorem subtype_linear (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] :
s.subtype.linear = s.direction.subtype := rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype_linear AffineSubspace.subtype_linear
theorem subtype_apply (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] (p : s) : s.subtype p = p :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.subtype_apply AffineSubspace.subtype_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeSubtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : (s.subtype : s → P) = ((↑) : s → P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_subtype AffineSubspace.coeSubtype
theorem injective_subtype (s : AffineSubspace k P) [Nonempty s] : Function.Injective s.subtype :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align affine_subspace.injective_subtype AffineSubspace.injective_subtype
/-- Two affine subspaces with nonempty intersection are equal if and only if their directions are
equal. -/
theorem eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁)
(h₂ : p ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁.direction = s₂.direction :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext_of_direction_eq h ⟨p, h₁, h₂⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem AffineSubspace.eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem
/-- Construct an affine subspace from a point and a direction. -/
def mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : AffineSubspace k P where
carrier := { q | ∃ v ∈ direction, q = v +ᵥ p }
smul_vsub_vadd_mem c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3 := by
rcases hp1 with ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩
rcases hp2 with ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩
rcases hp3 with ⟨v3, hv3, hp3⟩
use c • (v1 - v2) + v3, direction.add_mem (direction.smul_mem c (direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2)) hv3
simp [hp1, hp2, hp3, vadd_vadd]
#align affine_subspace.mk' AffineSubspace.mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains that point. -/
theorem self_mem_mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨0, ⟨direction.zero_mem, (zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.self_mem_mk' AffineSubspace.self_mem_mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains the result of adding a
vector in that direction to that point. -/
theorem vadd_mem_mk' {v : V} (p : P) {direction : Submodule k V} (hv : v ∈ direction) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_mk' AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_mk'
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction is nonempty. -/
theorem mk'_nonempty (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) : (mk' p direction : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨p, self_mem_mk' p direction⟩
#align affine_subspace.mk'_nonempty AffineSubspace.mk'_nonempty
/-- The direction of an affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_mk' (p : P) (direction : Submodule k V) :
(mk' p direction).direction = direction := by
ext v
rw [mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub (mk'_nonempty _ _)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p1, ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩, p2, ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩, hv⟩
rw [hv, hp1, hp2, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2
· exact fun hv => ⟨v +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_mk' _ hv, p, self_mem_mk' _ _, (vadd_vsub _ _).symm⟩
#align affine_subspace.direction_mk' AffineSubspace.direction_mk'
/-- A point lies in an affine subspace constructed from another point and a direction if and only
if their difference is in that direction. -/
theorem mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem {p₁ p₂ : P} {direction : Submodule k V} :
p₂ ∈ mk' p₁ direction ↔ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ ∈ direction := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← direction_mk' p₁ direction]
exact vsub_mem_direction h (self_mem_mk' _ _)
· rw [← vsub_vadd p₂ p₁]
exact vadd_mem_mk' p₁ h
#align affine_subspace.mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem AffineSubspace.mem_mk'_iff_vsub_mem
/-- Constructing an affine subspace from a point in a subspace and that subspace's direction
yields the original subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) : mk' p s.direction = s :=
ext_of_direction_eq (direction_mk' p s.direction) ⟨p, Set.mem_inter (self_mem_mk' _ _) hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.mk'_eq AffineSubspace.mk'_eq
/-- If an affine subspace contains a set of points, it contains the `spanPoints` of that set. -/
theorem spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe {s : Set P} {s1 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s ⊆ s1) :
spanPoints k s ⊆ s1 := by
rintro p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, hp⟩
rw [hp]
have hp1s1 : p1 ∈ (s1 : Set P) := Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp1 h
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hp1s1
have hs : vectorSpan k s ≤ s1.direction := vectorSpan_mono k h
rw [SetLike.le_def] at hs
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hv hs
#align affine_subspace.span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe AffineSubspace.spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe
end AffineSubspace
namespace Submodule
variable {k V : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
@[simp]
theorem mem_toAffineSubspace {p : Submodule k V} {x : V} :
x ∈ p.toAffineSubspace ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toAffineSubspace_direction (s : Submodule k V) : s.toAffineSubspace.direction = s := by
ext x; simp [← s.toAffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ s.zero_mem]
end Submodule
theorem AffineMap.lineMap_mem {k V P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AddTorsor V P] {Q : AffineSubspace k P} {p₀ p₁ : P} (c : k) (h₀ : p₀ ∈ Q) (h₁ : p₁ ∈ Q) :
AffineMap.lineMap p₀ p₁ c ∈ Q := by
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
exact Q.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c h₁ h₀ h₀
#align affine_map.line_map_mem AffineMap.lineMap_mem
section affineSpan
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
/-- The affine span of a set of points is the smallest affine subspace containing those points.
(Actually defined here in terms of spans in modules.) -/
def affineSpan (s : Set P) : AffineSubspace k P where
carrier := spanPoints k s
smul_vsub_vadd_mem c _ _ _ hp1 hp2 hp3 :=
vadd_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_vectorSpan k hp3
((vectorSpan k s).smul_mem c
(vsub_mem_vectorSpan_of_mem_spanPoints_of_mem_spanPoints k hp1 hp2))
#align affine_span affineSpan
/-- The affine span, converted to a set, is `spanPoints`. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_affineSpan (s : Set P) : (affineSpan k s : Set P) = spanPoints k s :=
rfl
#align coe_affine_span coe_affineSpan
/-- A set is contained in its affine span. -/
theorem subset_affineSpan (s : Set P) : s ⊆ affineSpan k s :=
subset_spanPoints k s
#align subset_affine_span subset_affineSpan
/-- The direction of the affine span is the `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem direction_affineSpan (s : Set P) : (affineSpan k s).direction = vectorSpan k s := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
rintro v ⟨p1, ⟨p2, hp2, v1, hv1, hp1⟩, p3, ⟨p4, hp4, v2, hv2, hp3⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [hp1, hp3, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc]
exact
(vectorSpan k s).sub_mem ((vectorSpan k s).add_mem hv1 (vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp2 hp4)) hv2
· exact vectorSpan_mono k (subset_spanPoints k s)
#align direction_affine_span direction_affineSpan
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
theorem mem_affineSpan {p : P} {s : Set P} (hp : p ∈ s) : p ∈ affineSpan k s :=
mem_spanPoints k p s hp
#align mem_affine_span mem_affineSpan
end affineSpan
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[S : AffineSpace V P]
instance : CompleteLattice (AffineSubspace k P) :=
{
PartialOrder.lift ((↑) : AffineSubspace k P → Set P)
coe_injective with
sup := fun s1 s2 => affineSpan k (s1 ∪ s2)
le_sup_left := fun s1 s2 =>
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_left (subset_spanPoints k _)
le_sup_right := fun s1 s2 =>
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_right (subset_spanPoints k _)
sup_le := fun s1 s2 s3 hs1 hs2 => spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (Set.union_subset hs1 hs2)
inf := fun s1 s2 =>
mk (s1 ∩ s2) fun c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3 =>
⟨s1.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.1 hp2.1 hp3.1, s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.2 hp2.2 hp3.2⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ => Set.inter_subset_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ => Set.inter_subset_right
le_sInf := fun S s1 hs1 => by
-- Porting note: surely there is an easier way?
refine Set.subset_sInter (t := (s1 : Set P)) ?_
rintro t ⟨s, _hs, rfl⟩
exact Set.subset_iInter (hs1 s)
top :=
{ carrier := Set.univ
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => Set.mem_univ _ }
le_top := fun _ _ _ => Set.mem_univ _
bot :=
{ carrier := ∅
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := fun _ _ _ _ => False.elim }
bot_le := fun _ _ => False.elim
sSup := fun s => affineSpan k (⋃ s' ∈ s, (s' : Set P))
sInf := fun s =>
mk (⋂ s' ∈ s, (s' : Set P)) fun c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3 =>
Set.mem_iInter₂.2 fun s2 hs2 => by
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂] at *
exact s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c (hp1 s2 hs2) (hp2 s2 hs2) (hp3 s2 hs2)
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => Set.Subset.trans (Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem h) (subset_spanPoints k _)
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (Set.iUnion₂_subset h)
sInf_le := fun _ _ => Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => Set.subset_inter }
instance : Inhabited (AffineSubspace k P) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The `≤` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding sets. -/
theorem le_def (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ (s1 : Set P) ⊆ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.le_def AffineSubspace.le_def
/-- One subspace is less than or equal to another if and only if all its points are in the second
subspace. -/
theorem le_def' (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∀ p ∈ s1, p ∈ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.le_def' AffineSubspace.le_def'
/-- The `<` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding sets. -/
theorem lt_def (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : s1 < s2 ↔ (s1 : Set P) ⊂ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.lt_def AffineSubspace.lt_def
/-- One subspace is not less than or equal to another if and only if it has a point not in the
second subspace. -/
theorem not_le_iff_exists (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : ¬s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∃ p ∈ s1, p ∉ s2 :=
Set.not_subset
#align affine_subspace.not_le_iff_exists AffineSubspace.not_le_iff_exists
/-- If a subspace is less than another, there is a point only in the second. -/
theorem exists_of_lt {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s1 < s2) : ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align affine_subspace.exists_of_lt AffineSubspace.exists_of_lt
/-- A subspace is less than another if and only if it is less than or equal to the second subspace
and there is a point only in the second. -/
theorem lt_iff_le_and_exists (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) :
s1 < s2 ↔ s1 ≤ s2 ∧ ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_le_iff_exists]
#align affine_subspace.lt_iff_le_and_exists AffineSubspace.lt_iff_le_and_exists
/-- If an affine subspace is nonempty and contained in another with the same direction, they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P}
(hd : s₁.direction = s₂.direction) (hn : (s₁ : Set P).Nonempty) (hle : s₁ ≤ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
let ⟨p, hp⟩ := hn
ext_of_direction_eq hd ⟨p, hp, hle hp⟩
#align affine_subspace.eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le AffineSubspace.eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le
variable (k V)
/-- The affine span is the `sInf` of subspaces containing the given points. -/
theorem affineSpan_eq_sInf (s : Set P) :
affineSpan k s = sInf { s' : AffineSubspace k P | s ⊆ s' } :=
le_antisymm (spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe <| Set.subset_iInter₂ fun _ => id)
(sInf_le (subset_spanPoints k _))
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_eq_Inf AffineSubspace.affineSpan_eq_sInf
variable (P)
/-- The Galois insertion formed by `affineSpan` and coercion back to a set. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (affineSpan k) ((↑) : AffineSubspace k P → Set P) where
choice s _ := affineSpan k s
gc s1 _s2 :=
⟨fun h => Set.Subset.trans (subset_spanPoints k s1) h, spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe⟩
le_l_u _ := subset_spanPoints k _
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align affine_subspace.gi AffineSubspace.gi
/-- The span of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : affineSpan k (∅ : Set P) = ⊥ :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc.l_bot
#align affine_subspace.span_empty AffineSubspace.span_empty
/-- The span of `univ` is `⊤`. -/
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : affineSpan k (Set.univ : Set P) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| subset_spanPoints k _
#align affine_subspace.span_univ AffineSubspace.span_univ
variable {k V P}
theorem _root_.affineSpan_le {s : Set P} {Q : AffineSubspace k P} :
affineSpan k s ≤ Q ↔ s ⊆ (Q : Set P) :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc _ _
#align affine_span_le affineSpan_le
variable (k V) {p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- The affine span of a single point, coerced to a set, contains just that point. -/
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: this needs to take priority over `coe_affineSpan`
theorem coe_affineSpan_singleton (p : P) : (affineSpan k ({p} : Set P) : Set P) = {p} := by
ext x
rw [mem_coe, ← vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_singleton p)) _,
direction_affineSpan]
simp
#align affine_subspace.coe_affine_span_singleton AffineSubspace.coe_affineSpan_singleton
/-- A point is in the affine span of a single point if and only if they are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_affineSpan_singleton : p₁ ∈ affineSpan k ({p₂} : Set P) ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
simp [← mem_coe]
#align affine_subspace.mem_affine_span_singleton AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton (x : P) :
((↑) : affineSpan k ({x} : Set P) → P) ⁻¹' {x} = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun y => (AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton _ _).1 y.2
#align affine_subspace.preimage_coe_affine_span_singleton AffineSubspace.preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton
/-- The span of a union of sets is the sup of their spans. -/
theorem span_union (s t : Set P) : affineSpan k (s ∪ t) = affineSpan k s ⊔ affineSpan k t :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc.l_sup
#align affine_subspace.span_union AffineSubspace.span_union
/-- The span of a union of an indexed family of sets is the sup of their spans. -/
theorem span_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Set P) :
affineSpan k (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, affineSpan k (s i) :=
(AffineSubspace.gi k V P).gc.l_iSup
#align affine_subspace.span_Union AffineSubspace.span_iUnion
variable (P)
/-- `⊤`, coerced to a set, is the whole set of points. -/
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : AffineSubspace k P) : Set P) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.top_coe AffineSubspace.top_coe
variable {P}
/-- All points are in `⊤`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (p : P) : p ∈ (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P) :=
Set.mem_univ p
#align affine_subspace.mem_top AffineSubspace.mem_top
variable (P)
/-- The direction of `⊤` is the whole module as a submodule. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_top : (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P).direction = ⊤ := by
cases' S.nonempty with p
ext v
refine ⟨imp_intro Submodule.mem_top, fun _hv => ?_⟩
have hpv : (v +ᵥ p -ᵥ p : V) ∈ (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P).direction :=
vsub_mem_direction (mem_top k V _) (mem_top k V _)
rwa [vadd_vsub] at hpv
#align affine_subspace.direction_top AffineSubspace.direction_top
/-- `⊥`, coerced to a set, is the empty set. -/
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : AffineSubspace k P) : Set P) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.bot_coe AffineSubspace.bot_coe
theorem bot_ne_top : (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P) ≠ ⊤ := by
intro contra
rw [← ext_iff, bot_coe, top_coe] at contra
exact Set.empty_ne_univ contra
#align affine_subspace.bot_ne_top AffineSubspace.bot_ne_top
instance : Nontrivial (AffineSubspace k P) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, bot_ne_top k V P⟩⟩
theorem nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top {s : Set P} (h : affineSpan k s = ⊤) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
rintro rfl
rw [AffineSubspace.span_empty] at h
exact bot_ne_top k V P h
#align affine_subspace.nonempty_of_affine_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top
/-- If the affine span of a set is `⊤`, then the vector span of the same set is the `⊤`. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_top_of_affineSpan_eq_top {s : Set P} (h : affineSpan k s = ⊤) :
vectorSpan k s = ⊤ := by rw [← direction_affineSpan, h, direction_top]
#align affine_subspace.vector_span_eq_top_of_affine_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.vectorSpan_eq_top_of_affineSpan_eq_top
/-- For a nonempty set, the affine span is `⊤` iff its vector span is `⊤`. -/
theorem affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nonempty {s : Set P} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
affineSpan k s = ⊤ ↔ vectorSpan k s = ⊤ := by
refine ⟨vectorSpan_eq_top_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P, ?_⟩
intro h
suffices Nonempty (affineSpan k s) by
obtain ⟨p, hp : p ∈ affineSpan k s⟩ := this
rw [eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem hp (mem_top k V p), direction_affineSpan, h, direction_top]
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
exact ⟨⟨x, mem_affineSpan k hx⟩⟩
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_eq_top_iff_vector_span_eq_top_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nonempty
/-- For a non-trivial space, the affine span of a set is `⊤` iff its vector span is `⊤`. -/
theorem affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nontrivial {s : Set P} [Nontrivial P] :
affineSpan k s = ⊤ ↔ vectorSpan k s = ⊤ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· simp [hs, subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, AddTorsor.subsingleton_iff V P, not_subsingleton]
· rw [affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nonempty k V P hs]
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_eq_top_iff_vector_span_eq_top_of_nontrivial AffineSubspace.affineSpan_eq_top_iff_vectorSpan_eq_top_of_nontrivial
theorem card_pos_of_affineSpan_eq_top {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {p : ι → P}
(h : affineSpan k (range p) = ⊤) : 0 < Fintype.card ι := by
obtain ⟨-, ⟨i, -⟩⟩ := nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P h
exact Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨i⟩
#align affine_subspace.card_pos_of_affine_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.card_pos_of_affineSpan_eq_top
attribute [local instance] toAddTorsor
/-- The top affine subspace is linearly equivalent to the affine space.
This is the affine version of `Submodule.topEquiv`. -/
@[simps! linear apply symm_apply_coe]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : AffineSubspace k P) ≃ᵃ[k] P where
toEquiv := Equiv.Set.univ P
linear := .ofEq _ _ (direction_top _ _ _) ≪≫ₗ Submodule.topEquiv
map_vadd' _p _v := rfl
variable {P}
/-- No points are in `⊥`. -/
theorem not_mem_bot (p : P) : p ∉ (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P) :=
Set.not_mem_empty p
#align affine_subspace.not_mem_bot AffineSubspace.not_mem_bot
variable (P)
/-- The direction of `⊥` is the submodule `⊥`. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_bot : (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P).direction = ⊥ := by
rw [direction_eq_vectorSpan, bot_coe, vectorSpan_def, vsub_empty, Submodule.span_empty]
#align affine_subspace.direction_bot AffineSubspace.direction_bot
variable {k V P}
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_bot_iff (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : (Q : Set P) = ∅ ↔ Q = ⊥ :=
coe_injective.eq_iff' (bot_coe _ _ _)
#align affine_subspace.coe_eq_bot_iff AffineSubspace.coe_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_univ_iff (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : (Q : Set P) = univ ↔ Q = ⊤ :=
coe_injective.eq_iff' (top_coe _ _ _)
#align affine_subspace.coe_eq_univ_iff AffineSubspace.coe_eq_univ_iff
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_bot (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : (Q : Set P).Nonempty ↔ Q ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
exact not_congr Q.coe_eq_bot_iff
#align affine_subspace.nonempty_iff_ne_bot AffineSubspace.nonempty_iff_ne_bot
theorem eq_bot_or_nonempty (Q : AffineSubspace k P) : Q = ⊥ ∨ (Q : Set P).Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_bot]
apply eq_or_ne
#align affine_subspace.eq_bot_or_nonempty AffineSubspace.eq_bot_or_nonempty
theorem subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top {s : Set P} (h₁ : s.Subsingleton)
(h₂ : affineSpan k s = ⊤) : Subsingleton P := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := AffineSubspace.nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P h₂
have : s = {p} := Subset.antisymm (fun q hq => h₁ hq hp) (by simp [hp])
rw [this, ← AffineSubspace.ext_iff, AffineSubspace.coe_affineSpan_singleton,
AffineSubspace.top_coe, eq_comm, ← subsingleton_iff_singleton (mem_univ _)] at h₂
exact subsingleton_of_univ_subsingleton h₂
#align affine_subspace.subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top
theorem eq_univ_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top {s : Set P} (h₁ : s.Subsingleton)
(h₂ : affineSpan k s = ⊤) : s = (univ : Set P) := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := AffineSubspace.nonempty_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P h₂
have : s = {p} := Subset.antisymm (fun q hq => h₁ hq hp) (by simp [hp])
rw [this, eq_comm, ← subsingleton_iff_singleton (mem_univ p), subsingleton_univ_iff]
exact subsingleton_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top h₁ h₂
#align affine_subspace.eq_univ_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top AffineSubspace.eq_univ_of_subsingleton_span_eq_top
/-- A nonempty affine subspace is `⊤` if and only if its direction is `⊤`. -/
@[simp]
theorem direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty {s : AffineSubspace k P} (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
s.direction = ⊤ ↔ s = ⊤ := by
constructor
· intro hd
rw [← direction_top k V P] at hd
refine ext_of_direction_eq hd ?_
simp [h]
· rintro rfl
simp
#align affine_subspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty
/-- The inf of two affine subspaces, coerced to a set, is the intersection of the two sets of
points. -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : (s1 ⊓ s2 : Set P) = (s1 : Set P) ∩ s2 :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.inf_coe AffineSubspace.inf_coe
/-- A point is in the inf of two affine subspaces if and only if it is in both of them. -/
theorem mem_inf_iff (p : P) (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) : p ∈ s1 ⊓ s2 ↔ p ∈ s1 ∧ p ∈ s2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_subspace.mem_inf_iff AffineSubspace.mem_inf_iff
/-- The direction of the inf of two affine subspaces is less than or equal to the inf of their
directions. -/
theorem direction_inf (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) :
(s1 ⊓ s2).direction ≤ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction := by
simp only [direction_eq_vectorSpan, vectorSpan_def]
exact
le_inf (sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => trans (vsub_self_mono inter_subset_left) hp)
(sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => trans (vsub_self_mono inter_subset_right) hp)
#align affine_subspace.direction_inf AffineSubspace.direction_inf
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in common, the direction of their inf equals the inf of
their directions. -/
theorem direction_inf_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁) (h₂ : p ∈ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction := by
ext v
rw [Submodule.mem_inf, ← vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₁, ← vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₂, ←
vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩), mem_inf_iff]
#align affine_subspace.direction_inf_of_mem AffineSubspace.direction_inf_of_mem
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in their inf, the direction of their inf equals the inf of
their directions. -/
theorem direction_inf_of_mem_inf {s₁ s₂ : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} (h : p ∈ s₁ ⊓ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction :=
direction_inf_of_mem ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).1 ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).2
#align affine_subspace.direction_inf_of_mem_inf AffineSubspace.direction_inf_of_mem_inf
/-- If one affine subspace is less than or equal to another, the same applies to their
directions. -/
theorem direction_le {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s1 ≤ s2) : s1.direction ≤ s2.direction := by
simp only [direction_eq_vectorSpan, vectorSpan_def]
exact vectorSpan_mono k h
#align affine_subspace.direction_le AffineSubspace.direction_le
/-- If one nonempty affine subspace is less than another, the same applies to their directions -/
theorem direction_lt_of_nonempty {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P} (h : s1 < s2)
(hn : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) : s1.direction < s2.direction := by
cases' hn with p hp
rw [lt_iff_le_and_exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨hle, p2, hp2, hp2s1⟩
rw [SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists]
use direction_le hle, p2 -ᵥ p, vsub_mem_direction hp2 (hle hp)
intro hm
rw [vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp p2] at hm
exact hp2s1 hm
#align affine_subspace.direction_lt_of_nonempty AffineSubspace.direction_lt_of_nonempty
/-- The sup of the directions of two affine subspaces is less than or equal to the direction of
their sup. -/
theorem sup_direction_le (s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction ≤ (s1 ⊔ s2).direction := by
simp only [direction_eq_vectorSpan, vectorSpan_def]
exact
sup_le
(sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => Set.Subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp)
(sInf_le_sInf fun p hp => Set.Subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp)
#align affine_subspace.sup_direction_le AffineSubspace.sup_direction_le
/-- The sup of the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces with empty intersection is less than
the direction of their sup. -/
theorem sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : Set P).Nonempty) (he : (s1 ∩ s2 : Set P) = ∅) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction < (s1 ⊔ s2).direction := by
cases' h1 with p1 hp1
cases' h2 with p2 hp2
rw [SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists]
use sup_direction_le s1 s2, p2 -ᵥ p1,
vsub_mem_direction ((le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp2) ((le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp1)
intro h
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at h
rcases h with ⟨v1, hv1, v2, hv2, hv1v2⟩
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm v1, add_assoc, ←
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_neg v2, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub,
vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hv1v2
refine Set.Nonempty.ne_empty ?_ he
use v1 +ᵥ p1, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv1 hp1
rw [hv1v2]
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv2) hp2
#align affine_subspace.sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty AffineSubspace.sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces span the whole module, they have nonempty
intersection. -/
theorem inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : Set P).Nonempty)
(hd : s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction = ⊤) : ((s1 : Set P) ∩ s2).Nonempty := by
by_contra h
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at h
have hlt := sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty h1 h2 h
rw [hd] at hlt
exact not_top_lt hlt
#align affine_subspace.inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top AffineSubspace.inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces are complements of each other, they intersect
in exactly one point. -/
theorem inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_isCompl {s1 s2 : AffineSubspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : Set P).Nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : Set P).Nonempty)
(hd : IsCompl s1.direction s2.direction) : ∃ p, (s1 : Set P) ∩ s2 = {p} := by
cases' inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top h1 h2 hd.sup_eq_top with p hp
use p
ext q
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hq1, hq2⟩
have hqp : q -ᵥ p ∈ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction :=
⟨vsub_mem_direction hq1 hp.1, vsub_mem_direction hq2 hp.2⟩
rwa [hd.inf_eq_bot, Submodule.mem_bot, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hqp
· exact fun h => h.symm ▸ hp
#align affine_subspace.inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_is_compl AffineSubspace.inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_isCompl
/-- Coercing a subspace to a set then taking the affine span produces the original subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineSpan_coe (s : AffineSubspace k P) : affineSpan k (s : Set P) = s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (subset_spanPoints _ _)
rintro p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, rfl⟩
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp1
#align affine_subspace.affine_span_coe AffineSubspace.affineSpan_coe
end AffineSubspace
section AffineSpace'
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*}
open AffineSubspace Set
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the left. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((p -ᵥ ·) '' s) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_mono ?_)
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩
simp_rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p1 p2 p] at hv
rw [← hv, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_span]
exact fun m hm => Submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩)
· rintro v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩
exact ⟨p, hp, p2, hp2, hv⟩
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((· -ᵥ p) '' s) := by
rw [vectorSpan_def]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_mono ?_)
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩
simp_rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p1 p2 p] at hv
rw [← hv, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_span]
exact fun m hm => Submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩)
· rintro v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩
exact ⟨p2, hp2, p, hp, hv⟩
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the left,
excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((p -ᵥ ·) '' (s \ {p})) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k hp, ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hp, ←
Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right,
excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k s = Submodule.span k ((· -ᵥ p) '' (s \ {p})) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k hp, ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hp, ←
Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right,
excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne [DecidableEq P] [DecidableEq V] {s : Finset P}
{p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k (s : Set P) = Submodule.span k ((s.erase p).image (· -ᵥ p)) := by
simp [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne _ (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hp)]
#align vector_span_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of the image of a function is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the left, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne (p : ι → P) {s : Set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k (p '' s) = Submodule.span k ((p i -ᵥ ·) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (Set.mem_image_of_mem p hi), ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hi, ←
Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of the image of a function is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the right, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne (p : ι → P) {s : Set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vectorSpan k (p '' s) = Submodule.span k ((· -ᵥ p i) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_image_of_mem p hi), ← Set.insert_eq_of_mem hi,
← Set.insert_diff_singleton, Set.image_insert_eq, Set.image_insert_eq]
simp [Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
#align vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the left. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) = Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : ι => p i0 -ᵥ p i) := by
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (Set.mem_range_self i0), ← Set.range_comp]
congr
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the right. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) = Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : ι => p i -ᵥ p i0) := by
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_range_self i0), ← Set.range_comp]
congr
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the left, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) =
Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : { x // x ≠ i₀ } => p i₀ -ᵥ p i) := by
rw [← Set.image_univ, vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne k _ (Set.mem_univ i₀)]
congr with v
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨_, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩
· exact fun ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ => ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a given
point on the right, excluding the subtraction of that point from itself. -/
theorem vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) =
Submodule.span k (Set.range fun i : { x // x ≠ i₀ } => p i -ᵥ p i₀) := by
rw [← Set.image_univ, vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne k _ (Set.mem_univ i₀)]
congr with v
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨_, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩
· exact fun ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ => ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩
#align vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne
section
variable {s : Set P}
/-- The affine span of a set is nonempty if and only if that set is. -/
theorem affineSpan_nonempty : (affineSpan k s : Set P).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
spanPoints_nonempty k s
#align affine_span_nonempty affineSpan_nonempty
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.affineSpan⟩ := affineSpan_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.affine_span Set.Nonempty.affineSpan
/-- The affine span of a nonempty set is nonempty. -/
instance [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (affineSpan k s) :=
((nonempty_coe_sort.1 ‹_›).affineSpan _).to_subtype
/-- The affine span of a set is `⊥` if and only if that set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineSpan_eq_bot : affineSpan k s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_bot, affineSpan_nonempty,
nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align affine_span_eq_bot affineSpan_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_lt_affineSpan : ⊥ < affineSpan k s ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
exact (affineSpan_eq_bot _).not
#align bot_lt_affine_span bot_lt_affineSpan
end
variable {k}
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for all elements of `s` and is
preserved under certain affine combinations, then `p` holds for all elements of the span of `s`. -/
theorem affineSpan_induction {x : P} {s : Set P} {p : P → Prop} (h : x ∈ affineSpan k s)
(mem : ∀ x : P, x ∈ s → p x)
(smul_vsub_vadd : ∀ (c : k) (u v w : P), p u → p v → p w → p (c • (u -ᵥ v) +ᵥ w)) : p x :=
(affineSpan_le (Q := ⟨p, smul_vsub_vadd⟩)).mpr mem h
#align affine_span_induction affineSpan_induction
/-- A dependent version of `affineSpan_induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem affineSpan_induction' {s : Set P} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ affineSpan k s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (y) (hys : y ∈ s), p y (subset_affineSpan k _ hys))
(smul_vsub_vadd :
∀ (c : k) (u hu v hv w hw),
p u hu →
p v hv → p w hw → p (c • (u -ᵥ v) +ᵥ w) (AffineSubspace.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ hu hv hw))
{x : P} (h : x ∈ affineSpan k s) : p x h := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ affineSpan k s) (hc : p x hx) => hc
-- Porting note: Lean couldn't infer the motive
refine affineSpan_induction (p := fun y => ∃ z, p y z) h ?_ ?_
· exact fun y hy => ⟨subset_affineSpan _ _ hy, mem y hy⟩
· exact fun c u v w hu hv hw =>
Exists.elim hu fun hu' hu =>
Exists.elim hv fun hv' hv =>
Exists.elim hw fun hw' hw =>
⟨AffineSubspace.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ hu' hv' hw',
smul_vsub_vadd _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hu hv hw⟩
#align affine_span_induction' affineSpan_induction'
section WithLocalInstance
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
/-- A set, considered as a subset of its spanned affine subspace, spans the whole subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineSpan_coe_preimage_eq_top (A : Set P) [Nonempty A] :
affineSpan k (((↑) : affineSpan k A → P) ⁻¹' A) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ -
refine affineSpan_induction' (fun y hy ↦ ?_) (fun c u hu v hv w hw ↦ ?_) hx
· exact subset_affineSpan _ _ hy
· exact AffineSubspace.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _
#align affine_span_coe_preimage_eq_top affineSpan_coe_preimage_eq_top
end WithLocalInstance
/-- Suppose a set of vectors spans `V`. Then a point `p`, together with those vectors added to `p`,
spans `P`. -/
theorem affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top {s : Set V} (p : P)
(h : Submodule.span k (Set.range ((↑) : s → V)) = ⊤) :
affineSpan k ({p} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p) '' s) = ⊤ := by
convert ext_of_direction_eq _
⟨p, mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton _)), mem_top k V p⟩
rw [direction_affineSpan, direction_top,
vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton _) : p ∈ _),
eq_top_iff, ← h]
apply Submodule.span_mono
rintro v ⟨v', rfl⟩
use (v' : V) +ᵥ p
simp
#align affine_span_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top
variable (k)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of two points is the span of their difference. -/
theorem vectorSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = k ∙ p₁ -ᵥ p₂ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (mem_insert p₁ _), image_pair, vsub_self,
Submodule.span_insert_zero]
#align vector_span_pair vectorSpan_pair
/-- The `vectorSpan` of two points is the span of their difference (reversed). -/
theorem vectorSpan_pair_rev (p₁ p₂ : P) : vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = k ∙ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ := by
rw [pair_comm, vectorSpan_pair]
#align vector_span_pair_rev vectorSpan_pair_rev
/-- The difference between two points lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
vsub_mem_vectorSpan _ (Set.mem_insert _ _) (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _))
#align vsub_mem_vector_span_pair vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- The difference between two points (reversed) lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ -ᵥ p₁ ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
vsub_mem_vectorSpan _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _)) (Set.mem_insert _ _)
#align vsub_rev_mem_vector_span_pair vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair
variable {k}
/-- A multiple of the difference between two points lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem smul_vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair k p₁ p₂)
#align smul_vsub_mem_vector_span_pair smul_vsub_mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- A multiple of the difference between two points (reversed) lies in their `vectorSpan`. -/
theorem smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) :=
Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair k p₁ p₂)
#align smul_vsub_rev_mem_vector_span_pair smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- A vector lies in the `vectorSpan` of two points if and only if it is a multiple of their
difference. -/
theorem mem_vectorSpan_pair {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) = v := by
rw [vectorSpan_pair, Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
#align mem_vector_span_pair mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- A vector lies in the `vectorSpan` of two points if and only if it is a multiple of their
difference (reversed). -/
theorem mem_vectorSpan_pair_rev {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v ∈ vectorSpan k ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) = v := by
rw [vectorSpan_pair_rev, Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
#align mem_vector_span_pair_rev mem_vectorSpan_pair_rev
variable (k)
/-- The line between two points, as an affine subspace. -/
notation "line[" k ", " p₁ ", " p₂ "]" =>
affineSpan k (insert p₁ (@singleton _ _ Set.instSingletonSet p₂))
/-- The first of two points lies in their affine span. -/
theorem left_mem_affineSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
mem_affineSpan _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)
#align left_mem_affine_span_pair left_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- The second of two points lies in their affine span. -/
theorem right_mem_affineSpan_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
mem_affineSpan _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _))
#align right_mem_affine_span_pair right_mem_affineSpan_pair
variable {k}
/-- A combination of two points expressed with `lineMap` lies in their affine span. -/
theorem AffineMap.lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
AffineMap.lineMap p₁ p₂ r ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_mem _ (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _) (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _)
#align affine_map.line_map_mem_affine_span_pair AffineMap.lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A combination of two points expressed with `lineMap` (with the two points reversed) lies in
their affine span. -/
theorem AffineMap.lineMap_rev_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
AffineMap.lineMap p₂ p₁ r ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_mem _ (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _) (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _)
#align affine_map.line_map_rev_mem_affine_span_pair AffineMap.lineMap_rev_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A multiple of the difference of two points added to the first point lies in their affine
span. -/
theorem smul_vsub_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align smul_vsub_vadd_mem_affine_span_pair smul_vsub_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A multiple of the difference of two points added to the second point lies in their affine
span. -/
theorem smul_vsub_rev_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair (r : k) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) +ᵥ p₂ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] :=
AffineMap.lineMap_rev_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align smul_vsub_rev_vadd_mem_affine_span_pair smul_vsub_rev_vadd_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A vector added to the first point lies in the affine span of two points if and only if it is
a multiple of their difference. -/
theorem vadd_left_mem_affineSpan_pair {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v +ᵥ p₁ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) = v := by
rw [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _), direction_affineSpan,
mem_vectorSpan_pair_rev]
#align vadd_left_mem_affine_span_pair vadd_left_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- A vector added to the second point lies in the affine span of two points if and only if it is
a multiple of their difference. -/
theorem vadd_right_mem_affineSpan_pair {p₁ p₂ : P} {v : V} :
v +ᵥ p₂ ∈ line[k, p₁, p₂] ↔ ∃ r : k, r • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) = v := by
rw [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _), direction_affineSpan,
mem_vectorSpan_pair]
#align vadd_right_mem_affine_span_pair vadd_right_mem_affineSpan_pair
/-- The span of two points that lie in an affine subspace is contained in that subspace. -/
theorem affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem {p₁ p₂ : P} {s : AffineSubspace k P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : line[k, p₁, p₂] ≤ s := by
rw [affineSpan_le, Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩
#align affine_span_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem
/-- One line is contained in another differing in the first point if the first point of the first
line is contained in the second line. -/
theorem affineSpan_pair_le_of_left_mem {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ line[k, p₂, p₃]) :
line[k, p₁, p₃] ≤ line[k, p₂, p₃] :=
affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem h (right_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _)
#align affine_span_pair_le_of_left_mem affineSpan_pair_le_of_left_mem
/-- One line is contained in another differing in the second point if the second point of the
first line is contained in the second line. -/
theorem affineSpan_pair_le_of_right_mem {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ line[k, p₂, p₃]) :
line[k, p₂, p₁] ≤ line[k, p₂, p₃] :=
affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _) h
#align affine_span_pair_le_of_right_mem affineSpan_pair_le_of_right_mem
variable (k)
/-- `affineSpan` is monotone. -/
@[mono]
theorem affineSpan_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : affineSpan k s₁ ≤ affineSpan k s₂ :=
spanPoints_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (Set.Subset.trans h (subset_affineSpan k _))
#align affine_span_mono affineSpan_mono
/-- Taking the affine span of a set, adding a point and taking the span again produces the same
results as adding the point to the set and taking the span. -/
theorem affineSpan_insert_affineSpan (p : P) (ps : Set P) :
affineSpan k (insert p (affineSpan k ps : Set P)) = affineSpan k (insert p ps) := by
rw [Set.insert_eq, Set.insert_eq, span_union, span_union, affineSpan_coe]
#align affine_span_insert_affine_span affineSpan_insert_affineSpan
/-- If a point is in the affine span of a set, adding it to that set does not change the affine
span. -/
theorem affineSpan_insert_eq_affineSpan {p : P} {ps : Set P} (h : p ∈ affineSpan k ps) :
affineSpan k (insert p ps) = affineSpan k ps := by
rw [← mem_coe] at h
rw [← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan, Set.insert_eq_of_mem h, affineSpan_coe]
#align affine_span_insert_eq_affine_span affineSpan_insert_eq_affineSpan
variable {k}
/-- If a point is in the affine span of a set, adding it to that set does not change the vector
span. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/AffineSubspace.lean | 1,415 | 1,417 | theorem vectorSpan_insert_eq_vectorSpan {p : P} {ps : Set P} (h : p ∈ affineSpan k ps) :
vectorSpan k (insert p ps) = vectorSpan k ps := by |
simp_rw [← direction_affineSpan, affineSpan_insert_eq_affineSpan _ h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicIntegers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ZMod
#align_import number_theory.padics.ring_homs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"565eb991e264d0db702722b4bde52ee5173c9950"
/-!
# Relating `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod (p ^ n)`
In this file we establish connections between the `p`-adic integers $\mathbb{Z}_p$
and the integers modulo powers of `p`, $\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$.
## Main declarations
We show that $\mathbb{Z}_p$ has a ring hom to $\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$ for each `n`.
The case for `n = 1` is handled separately, since it is used in the general construction
and we may want to use it without the `^1` getting in the way.
* `PadicInt.toZMod`: ring hom to `ZMod p`
* `PadicInt.toZModPow`: ring hom to `ZMod (p^n)`
* `PadicInt.ker_toZMod` / `PadicInt.ker_toZModPow`: the kernels of these maps are the ideals
generated by `p^n`
We also establish the universal property of $\mathbb{Z}_p$ as a projective limit.
Given a family of compatible ring homs $f_k : R \to \mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$,
there is a unique limit $R \to \mathbb{Z}_p$.
* `PadicInt.lift`: the limit function
* `PadicInt.lift_spec` / `PadicInt.lift_unique`: the universal property
## Implementation notes
The ring hom constructions go through an auxiliary constructor `PadicInt.toZModHom`,
which removes some boilerplate code.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Nat LocalRing Padic
namespace PadicInt
variable {p : ℕ} [hp_prime : Fact p.Prime]
section RingHoms
/-! ### Ring homomorphisms to `ZMod p` and `ZMod (p ^ n)` -/
variable (p) (r : ℚ)
/-- `modPart p r` is an integer that satisfies
`‖(r - modPart p r : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1` when `‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1`,
see `PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart`.
It is the unique non-negative integer that is `< p` with this property.
(Note that this definition assumes `r : ℚ`.
See `PadicInt.zmodRepr` for a version that takes values in `ℕ`
and works for arbitrary `x : ℤ_[p]`.) -/
def modPart : ℤ :=
r.num * gcdA r.den p % p
#align padic_int.mod_part PadicInt.modPart
variable {p}
theorem modPart_lt_p : modPart p r < p := by
convert Int.emod_lt _ _
· simp
· exact mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
#align padic_int.mod_part_lt_p PadicInt.modPart_lt_p
theorem modPart_nonneg : 0 ≤ modPart p r :=
Int.emod_nonneg _ <| mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
#align padic_int.mod_part_nonneg PadicInt.modPart_nonneg
theorem isUnit_den (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : IsUnit (r.den : ℤ_[p]) := by
rw [isUnit_iff]
apply le_antisymm (r.den : ℤ_[p]).2
rw [← not_lt, coe_natCast]
intro norm_denom_lt
have hr : ‖(r * r.den : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ := by
congr
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rw [padicNormE.mul] at hr
have key : ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
calc
_ = _ := hr.symm
_ < 1 * 1 := mul_lt_mul' h norm_denom_lt (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one
_ = 1 := mul_one 1
have : ↑p ∣ r.num ∧ (p : ℤ) ∣ r.den := by
simp only [← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← padic_norm_e_of_padicInt]
exact ⟨key, norm_denom_lt⟩
apply hp_prime.1.not_dvd_one
rwa [← r.reduced.gcd_eq_one, Nat.dvd_gcd_iff, ← Int.natCast_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
#align padic_int.is_unit_denom PadicInt.isUnit_den
theorem norm_sub_modPart_aux (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
↑p ∣ r.num - r.num * r.den.gcdA p % p * ↑r.den := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_mod, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_sub]
have := congr_arg (fun x => x % p : ℤ → ZMod p) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab r.den p)
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, CharP.cast_eq_zero, EuclideanDomain.mod_zero, Int.cast_add,
Int.cast_mul, zero_mul, add_zero] at this
push_cast
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc, ← this]
suffices rdcp : r.den.Coprime p by
rw [rdcp.gcd_eq_one]
simp only [mul_one, cast_one, sub_self]
apply Coprime.symm
apply (coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp_prime.1 _).resolve_right
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, not_lt]
apply ge_of_eq
rw [← isUnit_iff]
exact isUnit_den r h
#align padic_int.norm_sub_mod_part_aux PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart_aux
theorem norm_sub_modPart (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - modPart p r : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
let n := modPart p r
rw [norm_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← (isUnit_den r h).dvd_mul_right]
suffices ↑p ∣ r.num - n * r.den by
convert (Int.castRingHom ℤ_[p]).map_dvd this
simp only [sub_mul, Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_mul, sub_left_inj, Int.cast_sub]
apply Subtype.coe_injective
simp only [coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast]
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rfl
exact norm_sub_modPart_aux r h
#align padic_int.norm_sub_mod_part PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart
theorem exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
∃ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ n ∧ n < p ∧ ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - n : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 :=
⟨modPart p r, modPart_nonneg _, modPart_lt_p _, norm_sub_modPart _ h⟩
#align padic_int.exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one PadicInt.exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℤ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton] at ha hb
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_pow]
rw [← dvd_neg, neg_sub] at ha
have := dvd_add ha hb
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ←
Int.cast_sub, pow_p_dvd_int_iff] at this
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
simpa using zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux n x a b ha hb
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/RingHoms.lean | 159 | 167 | theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (hm : x - m ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p])
(hn : x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) : (m : ZMod p) = n := by |
rw [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p] at hm hn
have := zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux 1 x m n
simp only [pow_one] at this
specialize this hm hn
apply_fun ZMod.castHom (show p ∣ p ^ 1 by rw [pow_one]) (ZMod p) at this
simp only [map_intCast] at this
simpa only [Int.cast_natCast] using this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Presheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
#align_import algebraic_geometry.presheafed_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
/-!
# Presheafed spaces
Introduces the category of topological spaces equipped with a presheaf (taking values in an
arbitrary target category `C`.)
We further describe how to apply functors and natural transformations to the values of the
presheaves.
-/
open Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor TopCat TopologicalSpace
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
-- Porting note: we used to have:
-- local attribute [tidy] tactic.auto_cases_opens
-- We would replace this by:
-- attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opens
-- although it doesn't appear to help in this file, in any case.
-- Porting note: we used to have:
-- local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
-- A possible replacement would be:
-- attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opposite
-- but this would probably require https://github.com/JLimperg/aesop/issues/59
-- In any case, it doesn't seem necessary here.
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
-- Porting note: `PresheafSpace.{w} C` is the type of topological spaces in `Type w` equipped
-- with a presheaf with values in `C`; then there is a total of three universe parameters
-- in `PresheafSpace.{w, v, u} C`, where `C : Type u` and `Category.{v} C`.
-- In mathlib3, some definitions in this file unnecessarily assumed `w=v`. This restriction
-- has been removed.
/-- A `PresheafedSpace C` is a topological space equipped with a presheaf of `C`s. -/
structure PresheafedSpace where
carrier : TopCat
protected presheaf : carrier.Presheaf C
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace
variable {C}
namespace PresheafedSpace
-- Porting note: using `Coe` here triggers an error, `CoeOut` seems an acceptable alternative
instance coeCarrier : CoeOut (PresheafedSpace C) TopCat where coe X := X.carrier
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.coe_carrier AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.coeCarrier
attribute [coe] PresheafedSpace.carrier
-- Porting note: we add this instance, as Lean does not reliably use the `CoeOut` instance above
-- in downstream files.
instance : CoeSort (PresheafedSpace C) Type* where coe := fun X => X.carrier
-- Porting note: the following lemma is removed because it is a syntactic tauto
/-@[simp]
theorem as_coe (X : PresheafedSpace.{w, v, u} C) : X.carrier = (X : TopCat.{w}) :=
rfl-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#noalign algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.as_coe
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the `simpVarHead` linter complains
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_coe (carrier) (presheaf) :
(({ carrier
presheaf } : PresheafedSpace C) : TopCat) = carrier :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.mk_coe AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.mk_coe
instance (X : PresheafedSpace C) : TopologicalSpace X :=
X.carrier.str
/-- The constant presheaf on `X` with value `Z`. -/
def const (X : TopCat) (Z : C) : PresheafedSpace C where
carrier := X
presheaf := (Functor.const _).obj Z
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.const AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.const
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (PresheafedSpace C) :=
⟨const (TopCat.of PEmpty) default⟩
/-- A morphism between presheafed spaces `X` and `Y` consists of a continuous map
`f` between the underlying topological spaces, and a (notice contravariant!) map
from the presheaf on `Y` to the pushforward of the presheaf on `X` via `f`. -/
structure Hom (X Y : PresheafedSpace C) where
base : (X : TopCat) ⟶ (Y : TopCat)
c : Y.presheaf ⟶ base _* X.presheaf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.hom AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.Hom
-- Porting note: eventually, the ext lemma shall be applied to terms in `X ⟶ Y`
-- rather than `Hom X Y`, this one was renamed `Hom.ext` instead of `ext`,
-- and the more practical lemma `ext` is defined just after the definition
-- of the `Category` instance
@[ext]
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/PresheafedSpace.lean | 112 | 121 | theorem Hom.ext {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α β : Hom X Y) (w : α.base = β.base)
(h : α.c ≫ whiskerRight (eqToHom (by rw [w])) _ = β.c) : α = β := by |
rcases α with ⟨base, c⟩
rcases β with ⟨base', c'⟩
dsimp at w
subst w
dsimp at h
erw [whiskerRight_id', comp_id] at h
subst h
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.IsoIoo
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsBounded
#align_import topology.tietze_extension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Tietze extension theorem
In this file we prove a few version of the Tietze extension theorem. The theorem says that a
continuous function `s → ℝ` defined on a closed set in a normal topological space `Y` can be
extended to a continuous function on the whole space. Moreover, if all values of the original
function belong to some (finite or infinite, open or closed) interval, then the extension can be
chosen so that it takes values in the same interval. In particular, if the original function is a
bounded function, then there exists a bounded extension of the same norm.
The proof mostly follows <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Tietze+extension+theorem>. We patch a small
gap in the proof for unbounded functions, see
`exists_extension_forall_exists_le_ge_of_closedEmbedding`.
In addition we provide a class `TietzeExtension` encoding the idea that a topological space
satisfies the Tietze extension theorem. This allows us to get a version of the Tietze extension
theorem that simultaneously applies to `ℝ`, `ℝ × ℝ`, `ℂ`, `ι → ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` et cetera. At some point
in the future, it may be desirable to provide instead a more general approach via
*absolute retracts*, but the current implementation covers the most common use cases easily.
## Implementation notes
We first prove the theorems for a closed embedding `e : X → Y` of a topological space into a normal
topological space, then specialize them to the case `X = s : Set Y`, `e = (↑)`.
## Tags
Tietze extension theorem, Urysohn's lemma, normal topological space
-/
/-! ### The `TietzeExtension` class -/
section TietzeExtensionClass
universe u u₁ u₂ v w
-- TODO: define *absolute retracts* and then prove they satisfy Tietze extension.
-- Then make instances of that instead and remove this class.
/-- A class encoding the concept that a space satisfies the Tietze extension property. -/
class TietzeExtension (Y : Type v) [TopologicalSpace Y] : Prop where
exists_restrict_eq' {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] [NormalSpace X] (s : Set X)
(hs : IsClosed s) (f : C(s, Y)) : ∃ (g : C(X, Y)), g.restrict s = f
variable {X₁ : Type u₁} [TopologicalSpace X₁]
variable {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] [NormalSpace X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
variable {e : X₁ → X} (he : ClosedEmbedding e)
variable {Y : Type v} [TopologicalSpace Y] [TietzeExtension.{u, v} Y]
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for `TietzeExtension` spaces, a version for a closed set. Let
`s` be a closed set in a normal topological space `X`. Let `f` be a continuous function
on `s` with values in a `TietzeExtension` space `Y`. Then there exists a continuous function
`g : C(X, Y)` such that `g.restrict s = f`. -/
theorem ContinuousMap.exists_restrict_eq (f : C(s, Y)) : ∃ (g : C(X, Y)), g.restrict s = f :=
TietzeExtension.exists_restrict_eq' s hs f
#align continuous_map.exists_restrict_eq_of_closed ContinuousMap.exists_restrict_eq
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for `TietzeExtension` spaces. Let `e` be a closed embedding of a
nonempty topological space `X₁` into a normal topological space `X`. Let `f` be a continuous
function on `X₁` with values in a `TietzeExtension` space `Y`. Then there exists a
continuous function `g : C(X, Y)` such that `g ∘ e = f`. -/
theorem ContinuousMap.exists_extension (f : C(X₁, Y)) :
∃ (g : C(X, Y)), g.comp ⟨e, he.continuous⟩ = f := by
let e' : X₁ ≃ₜ Set.range e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ he.toEmbedding
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := (f.comp e'.symm).exists_restrict_eq he.isClosed_range
exact ⟨g, by ext x; simpa using congr($(hg) ⟨e' x, x, rfl⟩)⟩
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for `TietzeExtension` spaces. Let `e` be a closed embedding of a
nonempty topological space `X₁` into a normal topological space `X`. Let `f` be a continuous
function on `X₁` with values in a `TietzeExtension` space `Y`. Then there exists a
continuous function `g : C(X, Y)` such that `g ∘ e = f`.
This version is provided for convenience and backwards compatibility. Here the composition is
phrased in terms of bare functions. -/
theorem ContinuousMap.exists_extension' (f : C(X₁, Y)) : ∃ (g : C(X, Y)), g ∘ e = f :=
f.exists_extension he |>.imp fun g hg ↦ by ext x; congrm($(hg) x)
#align continuous_map.exists_extension_of_closed_embedding ContinuousMap.exists_extension'
/-- This theorem is not intended to be used directly because it is rare for a set alone to
satisfy `[TietzeExtension t]`. For example, `Metric.ball` in `ℝ` only satisfies it when
the radius is strictly positive, so finding this as an instance will fail.
Instead, it is intended to be used as a constructor for theorems about sets which *do* satisfy
`[TietzeExtension t]` under some hypotheses. -/
theorem ContinuousMap.exists_forall_mem_restrict_eq {Y : Type v} [TopologicalSpace Y] (f : C(s, Y))
{t : Set Y} (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) [ht : TietzeExtension.{u, v} t] :
∃ (g : C(X, Y)), (∀ x, g x ∈ t) ∧ g.restrict s = f := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := mk _ (map_continuous f |>.codRestrict hf) |>.exists_restrict_eq hs
exact ⟨comp ⟨Subtype.val, by continuity⟩ g, by simp, by ext x; congrm(($(hg) x : Y))⟩
/-- This theorem is not intended to be used directly because it is rare for a set alone to
satisfy `[TietzeExtension t]`. For example, `Metric.ball` in `ℝ` only satisfies it when
the radius is strictly positive, so finding this as an instance will fail.
Instead, it is intended to be used as a constructor for theorems about sets which *do* satisfy
`[TietzeExtension t]` under some hypotheses. -/
theorem ContinuousMap.exists_extension_forall_mem {Y : Type v} [TopologicalSpace Y] (f : C(X₁, Y))
{t : Set Y} (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) [ht : TietzeExtension.{u, v} t] :
∃ (g : C(X, Y)), (∀ x, g x ∈ t) ∧ g.comp ⟨e, he.continuous⟩ = f := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := mk _ (map_continuous f |>.codRestrict hf) |>.exists_extension he
exact ⟨comp ⟨Subtype.val, by continuity⟩ g, by simp, by ext x; congrm(($(hg) x : Y))⟩
instance Pi.instTietzeExtension {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[∀ i, TietzeExtension (Y i)] : TietzeExtension (∀ i, Y i) where
exists_restrict_eq' s hs f := by
obtain ⟨g', hg'⟩ := Classical.skolem.mp <| fun i ↦
ContinuousMap.exists_restrict_eq hs (ContinuousMap.piEquiv _ _ |>.symm f i)
exact ⟨ContinuousMap.piEquiv _ _ g', by ext x i; congrm($(hg' i) x)⟩
instance Prod.instTietzeExtension {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w} [TopologicalSpace Y]
[TietzeExtension.{u, v} Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TietzeExtension.{u, w} Z] :
TietzeExtension (Y × Z) where
exists_restrict_eq' s hs f := by
obtain ⟨g₁, hg₁⟩ := (ContinuousMap.fst.comp f).exists_restrict_eq hs
obtain ⟨g₂, hg₂⟩ := (ContinuousMap.snd.comp f).exists_restrict_eq hs
exact ⟨g₁.prodMk g₂, by ext1 x; congrm(($(hg₁) x), $(hg₂) x)⟩
instance Unique.instTietzeExtension {Y : Type v} [TopologicalSpace Y] [Unique Y] :
TietzeExtension.{u, v} Y where
exists_restrict_eq' _ _ f := ⟨.const _ default, by ext x; exact Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
/-- Any retract of a `TietzeExtension` space is one itself. -/
theorem TietzeExtension.of_retract {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w} [TopologicalSpace Y]
[TopologicalSpace Z] [TietzeExtension.{u, w} Z] (ι : C(Y, Z)) (r : C(Z, Y))
(h : r.comp ι = .id Y) : TietzeExtension.{u, v} Y where
exists_restrict_eq' s hs f := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := (ι.comp f).exists_restrict_eq hs
use r.comp g
ext1 x
have := congr(r.comp $(hg))
rw [← r.comp_assoc ι, h, f.id_comp] at this
congrm($this x)
/-- Any homeomorphism from a `TietzeExtension` space is one itself. -/
theorem TietzeExtension.of_homeo {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w} [TopologicalSpace Y]
[TopologicalSpace Z] [TietzeExtension.{u, w} Z] (e : Y ≃ₜ Z) :
TietzeExtension.{u, v} Y :=
.of_retract (e : C(Y, Z)) (e.symm : C(Z, Y)) <| by simp
end TietzeExtensionClass
/-! The Tietze extension theorem for `ℝ`. -/
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [NormalSpace Y]
open Metric Set Filter
open BoundedContinuousFunction Topology
noncomputable section
namespace BoundedContinuousFunction
/-- One step in the proof of the Tietze extension theorem. If `e : C(X, Y)` is a closed embedding
of a topological space into a normal topological space and `f : X →ᵇ ℝ` is a bounded continuous
function, then there exists a bounded continuous function `g : Y →ᵇ ℝ` of the norm `‖g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ / 3`
such that the distance between `g ∘ e` and `f` is at most `(2 / 3) * ‖f‖`. -/
theorem tietze_extension_step (f : X →ᵇ ℝ) (e : C(X, Y)) (he : ClosedEmbedding e) :
∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, ‖g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ / 3 ∧ dist (g.compContinuous e) f ≤ 2 / 3 * ‖f‖ := by
have h3 : (0 : ℝ) < 3 := by norm_num1
have h23 : 0 < (2 / 3 : ℝ) := by norm_num1
-- In the trivial case `f = 0`, we take `g = 0`
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with (rfl | hf)
· use 0
simp
replace hf : 0 < ‖f‖ := norm_pos_iff.2 hf
/- Otherwise, the closed sets `e '' (f ⁻¹' (Iic (-‖f‖ / 3)))` and `e '' (f ⁻¹' (Ici (‖f‖ / 3)))`
are disjoint, hence by Urysohn's lemma there exists a function `g` that is equal to `-‖f‖ / 3`
on the former set and is equal to `‖f‖ / 3` on the latter set. This function `g` satisfies the
assertions of the lemma. -/
have hf3 : -‖f‖ / 3 < ‖f‖ / 3 := (div_lt_div_right h3).2 (Left.neg_lt_self hf)
have hc₁ : IsClosed (e '' (f ⁻¹' Iic (-‖f‖ / 3))) :=
he.isClosedMap _ (isClosed_Iic.preimage f.continuous)
have hc₂ : IsClosed (e '' (f ⁻¹' Ici (‖f‖ / 3))) :=
he.isClosedMap _ (isClosed_Ici.preimage f.continuous)
have hd : Disjoint (e '' (f ⁻¹' Iic (-‖f‖ / 3))) (e '' (f ⁻¹' Ici (‖f‖ / 3))) := by
refine disjoint_image_of_injective he.inj (Disjoint.preimage _ ?_)
rwa [Iic_disjoint_Ici, not_le]
rcases exists_bounded_mem_Icc_of_closed_of_le hc₁ hc₂ hd hf3.le with ⟨g, hg₁, hg₂, hgf⟩
refine ⟨g, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine (norm_le <| div_nonneg hf.le h3.le).mpr fun y => ?_
simpa [abs_le, neg_div] using hgf y
· refine (dist_le <| mul_nonneg h23.le hf.le).mpr fun x => ?_
have hfx : -‖f‖ ≤ f x ∧ f x ≤ ‖f‖ := by
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_le] using f.norm_coe_le_norm x
rcases le_total (f x) (-‖f‖ / 3) with hle₁ | hle₁
· calc
|g (e x) - f x| = -‖f‖ / 3 - f x := by
rw [hg₁ (mem_image_of_mem _ hle₁), Function.const_apply,
abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hle₁)]
_ ≤ 2 / 3 * ‖f‖ := by linarith
· rcases le_total (f x) (‖f‖ / 3) with hle₂ | hle₂
· simp only [neg_div] at *
calc
dist (g (e x)) (f x) ≤ |g (e x)| + |f x| := dist_le_norm_add_norm _ _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ / 3 + ‖f‖ / 3 := (add_le_add (abs_le.2 <| hgf _) (abs_le.2 ⟨hle₁, hle₂⟩))
_ = 2 / 3 * ‖f‖ := by linarith
· calc
|g (e x) - f x| = f x - ‖f‖ / 3 := by
rw [hg₂ (mem_image_of_mem _ hle₂), abs_sub_comm, Function.const_apply,
abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hle₂)]
_ ≤ 2 / 3 * ‖f‖ := by linarith
#align bounded_continuous_function.tietze_extension_step BoundedContinuousFunction.tietze_extension_step
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued bounded continuous maps, a version with a closed
embedding and bundled composition. If `e : C(X, Y)` is a closed embedding of a topological space
into a normal topological space and `f : X →ᵇ ℝ` is a bounded continuous function, then there exists
a bounded continuous function `g : Y →ᵇ ℝ` of the same norm such that `g ∘ e = f`. -/
theorem exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closedEmbedding' (f : X →ᵇ ℝ) (e : C(X, Y))
(he : ClosedEmbedding e) : ∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, ‖g‖ = ‖f‖ ∧ g.compContinuous e = f := by
/- For the proof, we iterate `tietze_extension_step`. Each time we apply it to the difference
between the previous approximation and `f`. -/
choose F hF_norm hF_dist using fun f : X →ᵇ ℝ => tietze_extension_step f e he
set g : ℕ → Y →ᵇ ℝ := fun n => (fun g => g + F (f - g.compContinuous e))^[n] 0
have g0 : g 0 = 0 := rfl
have g_succ : ∀ n, g (n + 1) = g n + F (f - (g n).compContinuous e) := fun n =>
Function.iterate_succ_apply' _ _ _
have hgf : ∀ n, dist ((g n).compContinuous e) f ≤ (2 / 3) ^ n * ‖f‖ := by
intro n
induction' n with n ihn
· simp [g0]
· rw [g_succ n, add_compContinuous, ← dist_sub_right, add_sub_cancel_left, pow_succ', mul_assoc]
refine (hF_dist _).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (by norm_num1))
rwa [← dist_eq_norm']
have hg_dist : ∀ n, dist (g n) (g (n + 1)) ≤ 1 / 3 * ‖f‖ * (2 / 3) ^ n := by
intro n
calc
dist (g n) (g (n + 1)) = ‖F (f - (g n).compContinuous e)‖ := by
rw [g_succ, dist_eq_norm', add_sub_cancel_left]
_ ≤ ‖f - (g n).compContinuous e‖ / 3 := hF_norm _
_ = 1 / 3 * dist ((g n).compContinuous e) f := by rw [dist_eq_norm', one_div, div_eq_inv_mul]
_ ≤ 1 / 3 * ((2 / 3) ^ n * ‖f‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hgf n) (by norm_num1)
_ = 1 / 3 * ‖f‖ * (2 / 3) ^ n := by ac_rfl
have hg_cau : CauchySeq g := cauchySeq_of_le_geometric _ _ (by norm_num1) hg_dist
have :
Tendsto (fun n => (g n).compContinuous e) atTop
(𝓝 <| (limUnder atTop g).compContinuous e) :=
((continuous_compContinuous e).tendsto _).comp hg_cau.tendsto_limUnder
have hge : (limUnder atTop g).compContinuous e = f := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this (tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 ?_)
refine squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) hgf ?_
rw [← zero_mul ‖f‖]
refine (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one ?_ ?_).mul tendsto_const_nhds <;> norm_num1
refine ⟨limUnder atTop g, le_antisymm ?_ ?_, hge⟩
· rw [← dist_zero_left, ← g0]
refine
(dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ _ _ (by norm_num1)
hg_dist hg_cau.tendsto_limUnder).trans_eq ?_
field_simp [show (3 - 2 : ℝ) = 1 by norm_num1]
· rw [← hge]
exact norm_compContinuous_le _ _
#align bounded_continuous_function.exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closed_embedding' BoundedContinuousFunction.exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closedEmbedding'
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued bounded continuous maps, a version with a closed
embedding and unbundled composition. If `e : C(X, Y)` is a closed embedding of a topological space
into a normal topological space and `f : X →ᵇ ℝ` is a bounded continuous function, then there exists
a bounded continuous function `g : Y →ᵇ ℝ` of the same norm such that `g ∘ e = f`. -/
theorem exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closedEmbedding (f : X →ᵇ ℝ) {e : X → Y}
(he : ClosedEmbedding e) : ∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, ‖g‖ = ‖f‖ ∧ g ∘ e = f := by
rcases exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closedEmbedding' f ⟨e, he.continuous⟩ he with ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closed_embedding BoundedContinuousFunction.exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closedEmbedding
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued bounded continuous maps, a version for a closed
set. If `f` is a bounded continuous real-valued function defined on a closed set in a normal
topological space, then it can be extended to a bounded continuous function of the same norm defined
on the whole space. -/
theorem exists_norm_eq_restrict_eq_of_closed {s : Set Y} (f : s →ᵇ ℝ) (hs : IsClosed s) :
∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, ‖g‖ = ‖f‖ ∧ g.restrict s = f :=
exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closedEmbedding' f ((ContinuousMap.id _).restrict s)
(closedEmbedding_subtype_val hs)
#align bounded_continuous_function.exists_norm_eq_restrict_eq_of_closed BoundedContinuousFunction.exists_norm_eq_restrict_eq_of_closed
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued bounded continuous maps, a version for a closed
embedding and a bounded continuous function that takes values in a non-trivial closed interval.
See also `exists_extension_forall_mem_of_closedEmbedding` for a more general statement that works
for any interval (finite or infinite, open or closed).
If `e : X → Y` is a closed embedding and `f : X →ᵇ ℝ` is a bounded continuous function such that
`f x ∈ [a, b]` for all `x`, where `a ≤ b`, then there exists a bounded continuous function
`g : Y →ᵇ ℝ` such that `g y ∈ [a, b]` for all `y` and `g ∘ e = f`. -/
theorem exists_extension_forall_mem_Icc_of_closedEmbedding (f : X →ᵇ ℝ) {a b : ℝ} {e : X → Y}
(hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc a b) (hle : a ≤ b) (he : ClosedEmbedding e) :
∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, (∀ y, g y ∈ Icc a b) ∧ g ∘ e = f := by
rcases exists_extension_norm_eq_of_closedEmbedding (f - const X ((a + b) / 2)) he with
⟨g, hgf, hge⟩
refine ⟨const Y ((a + b) / 2) + g, fun y => ?_, ?_⟩
· suffices ‖f - const X ((a + b) / 2)‖ ≤ (b - a) / 2 by
simpa [Real.Icc_eq_closedBall, add_mem_closedBall_iff_norm] using
(norm_coe_le_norm g y).trans (hgf.trans_le this)
refine (norm_le <| div_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hle) zero_le_two).2 fun x => ?_
simpa only [Real.Icc_eq_closedBall] using hf x
· ext x
have : g (e x) = f x - (a + b) / 2 := congr_fun hge x
simp [this]
#align bounded_continuous_function.exists_extension_forall_mem_Icc_of_closed_embedding BoundedContinuousFunction.exists_extension_forall_mem_Icc_of_closedEmbedding
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued bounded continuous maps, a version for a closed
embedding. Let `e` be a closed embedding of a nonempty topological space `X` into a normal
topological space `Y`. Let `f` be a bounded continuous real-valued function on `X`. Then there
exists a bounded continuous function `g : Y →ᵇ ℝ` such that `g ∘ e = f` and each value `g y` belongs
to a closed interval `[f x₁, f x₂]` for some `x₁` and `x₂`. -/
theorem exists_extension_forall_exists_le_ge_of_closedEmbedding [Nonempty X] (f : X →ᵇ ℝ)
{e : X → Y} (he : ClosedEmbedding e) :
∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, (∀ y, ∃ x₁ x₂, g y ∈ Icc (f x₁) (f x₂)) ∧ g ∘ e = f := by
inhabit X
-- Put `a = ⨅ x, f x` and `b = ⨆ x, f x`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, IsGLB (range f) a := ⟨_, isGLB_ciInf f.isBounded_range.bddBelow⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b, IsLUB (range f) b := ⟨_, isLUB_ciSup f.isBounded_range.bddAbove⟩
-- Then `f x ∈ [a, b]` for all `x`
have hmem : ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc a b := fun x => ⟨ha.1 ⟨x, rfl⟩, hb.1 ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
-- Rule out the trivial case `a = b`
have hle : a ≤ b := (hmem default).1.trans (hmem default).2
rcases hle.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· have : ∀ x, f x = a := by simpa using hmem
use const Y a
simp [this, Function.funext_iff]
-- Put `c = (a + b) / 2`. Then `a < c < b` and `c - a = b - c`.
set c := (a + b) / 2
have hac : a < c := left_lt_add_div_two.2 hlt
have hcb : c < b := add_div_two_lt_right.2 hlt
have hsub : c - a = b - c := by
field_simp [c]
ring
/- Due to `exists_extension_forall_mem_Icc_of_closedEmbedding`, there exists an extension `g`
such that `g y ∈ [a, b]` for all `y`. However, if `a` and/or `b` do not belong to the range of
`f`, then we need to ensure that these points do not belong to the range of `g`. This is done
in two almost identical steps. First we deal with the case `∀ x, f x ≠ a`. -/
obtain ⟨g, hg_mem, hgf⟩ : ∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, (∀ y, ∃ x, g y ∈ Icc (f x) b) ∧ g ∘ e = f := by
rcases exists_extension_forall_mem_Icc_of_closedEmbedding f hmem hle he with ⟨g, hg_mem, hgf⟩
-- If `a ∈ range f`, then we are done.
rcases em (∃ x, f x = a) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | ha')
· exact ⟨g, fun y => ⟨x, hg_mem _⟩, hgf⟩
/- Otherwise, `g ⁻¹' {a}` is disjoint with `range e ∪ g ⁻¹' (Ici c)`, hence there exists a
function `dg : Y → ℝ` such that `dg ∘ e = 0`, `dg y = 0` whenever `c ≤ g y`, `dg y = c - a`
whenever `g y = a`, and `0 ≤ dg y ≤ c - a` for all `y`. -/
have hd : Disjoint (range e ∪ g ⁻¹' Ici c) (g ⁻¹' {a}) := by
refine disjoint_union_left.2 ⟨?_, Disjoint.preimage _ ?_⟩
· rw [Set.disjoint_left]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ (rfl : g (e x) = a)
exact ha' ⟨x, (congr_fun hgf x).symm⟩
· exact Set.disjoint_singleton_right.2 hac.not_le
rcases exists_bounded_mem_Icc_of_closed_of_le
(he.isClosed_range.union <| isClosed_Ici.preimage g.continuous)
(isClosed_singleton.preimage g.continuous) hd (sub_nonneg.2 hac.le) with
⟨dg, dg0, dga, dgmem⟩
replace hgf : ∀ x, (g + dg) (e x) = f x := by
intro x
simp [dg0 (Or.inl <| mem_range_self _), ← hgf]
refine ⟨g + dg, fun y => ?_, funext hgf⟩
have hay : a < (g + dg) y := by
rcases (hg_mem y).1.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· refine (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 ?_
calc
0 < c - g y := sub_pos.2 hac
_ = dg y := (dga rfl).symm
· exact hlt.trans_le ((le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).2 <| (dgmem y).1)
rcases ha.exists_between hay with ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, _, hxy⟩
refine ⟨x, hxy.le, ?_⟩
rcases le_total c (g y) with hc | hc
· simp [dg0 (Or.inr hc), (hg_mem y).2]
· calc
g y + dg y ≤ c + (c - a) := add_le_add hc (dgmem _).2
_ = b := by rw [hsub, add_sub_cancel]
/- Now we deal with the case `∀ x, f x ≠ b`. The proof is the same as in the first case, with
minor modifications that make it hard to deduplicate code. -/
choose xl hxl hgb using hg_mem
rcases em (∃ x, f x = b) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hb')
· exact ⟨g, fun y => ⟨xl y, x, hxl y, hgb y⟩, hgf⟩
have hd : Disjoint (range e ∪ g ⁻¹' Iic c) (g ⁻¹' {b}) := by
refine disjoint_union_left.2 ⟨?_, Disjoint.preimage _ ?_⟩
· rw [Set.disjoint_left]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ (rfl : g (e x) = b)
exact hb' ⟨x, (congr_fun hgf x).symm⟩
· exact Set.disjoint_singleton_right.2 hcb.not_le
rcases exists_bounded_mem_Icc_of_closed_of_le
(he.isClosed_range.union <| isClosed_Iic.preimage g.continuous)
(isClosed_singleton.preimage g.continuous) hd (sub_nonneg.2 hcb.le) with
⟨dg, dg0, dgb, dgmem⟩
replace hgf : ∀ x, (g - dg) (e x) = f x := by
intro x
simp [dg0 (Or.inl <| mem_range_self _), ← hgf]
refine ⟨g - dg, fun y => ?_, funext hgf⟩
have hyb : (g - dg) y < b := by
rcases (hgb y).eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· refine (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 ?_
calc
0 < g y - c := sub_pos.2 hcb
_ = dg y := (dgb rfl).symm
· exact ((sub_le_self_iff _).2 (dgmem _).1).trans_lt hlt
rcases hb.exists_between hyb with ⟨_, ⟨xu, rfl⟩, hyxu, _⟩
cases' lt_or_le c (g y) with hc hc
· rcases em (a ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | _)
· refine ⟨x, xu, ?_, hyxu.le⟩
calc
f x = c - (b - c) := by rw [← hsub, sub_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ g y - dg y := sub_le_sub hc.le (dgmem _).2
· have hay : a < (g - dg) y := by
calc
a = c - (b - c) := by rw [← hsub, sub_sub_cancel]
_ < g y - (b - c) := sub_lt_sub_right hc _
_ ≤ g y - dg y := sub_le_sub_left (dgmem _).2 _
rcases ha.exists_between hay with ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, _, hxy⟩
exact ⟨x, xu, hxy.le, hyxu.le⟩
· refine ⟨xl y, xu, ?_, hyxu.le⟩
simp [dg0 (Or.inr hc), hxl]
#align bounded_continuous_function.exists_extension_forall_exists_le_ge_of_closed_embedding BoundedContinuousFunction.exists_extension_forall_exists_le_ge_of_closedEmbedding
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued bounded continuous maps, a version for a closed
embedding. Let `e` be a closed embedding of a nonempty topological space `X` into a normal
topological space `Y`. Let `f` be a bounded continuous real-valued function on `X`. Let `t` be
a nonempty convex set of real numbers (we use `OrdConnected` instead of `Convex` to automatically
deduce this argument by typeclass search) such that `f x ∈ t` for all `x`. Then there exists
a bounded continuous real-valued function `g : Y →ᵇ ℝ` such that `g y ∈ t` for all `y` and
`g ∘ e = f`. -/
theorem exists_extension_forall_mem_of_closedEmbedding (f : X →ᵇ ℝ) {t : Set ℝ} {e : X → Y}
[hs : OrdConnected t] (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) (hne : t.Nonempty) (he : ClosedEmbedding e) :
∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, (∀ y, g y ∈ t) ∧ g ∘ e = f := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty X
· rcases hne with ⟨c, hc⟩
exact ⟨const Y c, fun _ => hc, funext fun x => isEmptyElim x⟩
rcases exists_extension_forall_exists_le_ge_of_closedEmbedding f he with ⟨g, hg, hgf⟩
refine ⟨g, fun y => ?_, hgf⟩
rcases hg y with ⟨xl, xu, h⟩
exact hs.out (hf _) (hf _) h
#align bounded_continuous_function.exists_extension_forall_mem_of_closed_embedding BoundedContinuousFunction.exists_extension_forall_mem_of_closedEmbedding
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued bounded continuous maps, a version for a closed
set. Let `s` be a closed set in a normal topological space `Y`. Let `f` be a bounded continuous
real-valued function on `s`. Let `t` be a nonempty convex set of real numbers (we use
`OrdConnected` instead of `Convex` to automatically deduce this argument by typeclass search) such
that `f x ∈ t` for all `x : s`. Then there exists a bounded continuous real-valued function
`g : Y →ᵇ ℝ` such that `g y ∈ t` for all `y` and `g.restrict s = f`. -/
theorem exists_forall_mem_restrict_eq_of_closed {s : Set Y} (f : s →ᵇ ℝ) (hs : IsClosed s)
{t : Set ℝ} [OrdConnected t] (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) (hne : t.Nonempty) :
∃ g : Y →ᵇ ℝ, (∀ y, g y ∈ t) ∧ g.restrict s = f := by
rcases exists_extension_forall_mem_of_closedEmbedding f hf hne
(closedEmbedding_subtype_val hs) with
⟨g, hg, hgf⟩
exact ⟨g, hg, DFunLike.coe_injective hgf⟩
#align bounded_continuous_function.exists_forall_mem_restrict_eq_of_closed BoundedContinuousFunction.exists_forall_mem_restrict_eq_of_closed
end BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace ContinuousMap
/-- **Tietze extension theorem** for real-valued continuous maps, a version for a closed
embedding. Let `e` be a closed embedding of a nonempty topological space `X` into a normal
topological space `Y`. Let `f` be a continuous real-valued function on `X`. Let `t` be a nonempty
convex set of real numbers (we use `OrdConnected` instead of `Convex` to automatically deduce this
argument by typeclass search) such that `f x ∈ t` for all `x`. Then there exists a continuous
real-valued function `g : C(Y, ℝ)` such that `g y ∈ t` for all `y` and `g ∘ e = f`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/TietzeExtension.lean | 464 | 495 | theorem exists_extension_forall_mem_of_closedEmbedding (f : C(X, ℝ)) {t : Set ℝ} {e : X → Y}
[hs : OrdConnected t] (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) (hne : t.Nonempty) (he : ClosedEmbedding e) :
∃ g : C(Y, ℝ), (∀ y, g y ∈ t) ∧ g ∘ e = f := by |
have h : ℝ ≃o Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1 := orderIsoIooNegOneOne ℝ
let F : X →ᵇ ℝ :=
{ toFun := (↑) ∘ h ∘ f
continuous_toFun := continuous_subtype_val.comp (h.continuous.comp f.continuous)
map_bounded' := isBounded_range_iff.1
((isBounded_Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1).subset <| range_subset_iff.2 fun x => (h (f x)).2) }
let t' : Set ℝ := (↑) ∘ h '' t
have ht_sub : t' ⊆ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1 := image_subset_iff.2 fun x _ => (h x).2
have : OrdConnected t' := by
constructor
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ z hz
lift z to Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1 using Icc_subset_Ioo (h x).2.1 (h y).2.2 hz
change z ∈ Icc (h x) (h y) at hz
rw [← h.image_Icc] at hz
rcases hz with ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
exact ⟨z, hs.out hx hy hz, rfl⟩
have hFt : ∀ x, F x ∈ t' := fun x => mem_image_of_mem _ (hf x)
rcases F.exists_extension_forall_mem_of_closedEmbedding hFt (hne.image _) he with ⟨G, hG, hGF⟩
let g : C(Y, ℝ) :=
⟨h.symm ∘ codRestrict G _ fun y => ht_sub (hG y),
h.symm.continuous.comp <| G.continuous.subtype_mk _⟩
have hgG : ∀ {y a}, g y = a ↔ G y = h a := @fun y a =>
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq.trans Subtype.ext_iff
refine ⟨g, fun y => ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases hG y with ⟨a, ha, hay⟩
convert ha
exact hgG.2 hay.symm
· ext x
exact hgG.2 (congr_fun hGF _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
#align_import topology.bases from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
/-!
# Bases of topologies. Countability axioms.
A topological basis on a topological space `t` is a collection of sets,
such that all open sets can be generated as unions of these sets, without the need to take
finite intersections of them. This file introduces a framework for dealing with these collections,
and also what more we can say under certain countability conditions on bases,
which are referred to as first- and second-countable.
We also briefly cover the theory of separable spaces, which are those with a countable, dense
subset. If a space is second-countable, and also has a countably generated uniformity filter
(for example, if `t` is a metric space), it will automatically be separable (and indeed, these
conditions are equivalent in this case).
## Main definitions
* `TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis s`: The topological space `t` has basis `s`.
* `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace α`: The topological space `t` has a countable, dense subset.
* `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable s`: The set `s` is contained in the closure of a countable set.
* `FirstCountableTopology α`: A topology in which `𝓝 x` is countably generated for
every `x`.
* `SecondCountableTopology α`: A topology which has a topological basis which is
countable.
## Main results
* `TopologicalSpace.FirstCountableTopology.tendsto_subseq`: In a first-countable space,
cluster points are limits of subsequences.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.isOpen_iUnion_countable`: In a second-countable space,
the union of arbitrarily-many open sets is equal to a sub-union of only countably many of these
sets.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.countable_cover_nhds`: Consider `f : α → Set α` with the
property that `f x ∈ 𝓝 x` for all `x`. Then there is some countable set `s` whose image covers
the space.
## Implementation Notes
For our applications we are interested that there exists a countable basis, but we do not need the
concrete basis itself. This allows us to declare these type classes as `Prop` to use them as mixins.
### TODO:
More fine grained instances for `FirstCountableTopology`,
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`, and more.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology
noncomputable section
namespace TopologicalSpace
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] {B : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α}
/-- A topological basis is one that satisfies the necessary conditions so that
it suffices to take unions of the basis sets to get a topology (without taking
finite intersections as well). -/
structure IsTopologicalBasis (s : Set (Set α)) : Prop where
/-- For every point `x`, the set of `t ∈ s` such that `x ∈ t` is directed downwards. -/
exists_subset_inter : ∀ t₁ ∈ s, ∀ t₂ ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, ∃ t₃ ∈ s, x ∈ t₃ ∧ t₃ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂
/-- The sets from `s` cover the whole space. -/
sUnion_eq : ⋃₀ s = univ
/-- The topology is generated by sets from `s`. -/
eq_generateFrom : t = generateFrom s
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.insert_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (insert ∅ s) := by
refine ⟨?_, by rw [sUnion_insert, empty_union, h.sUnion_eq], ?_⟩
· rintro t₁ (rfl | h₁) t₂ (rfl | h₂) x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
· cases hx₁
· cases hx₁
· cases hx₂
· obtain ⟨t₃, h₃, hs⟩ := h.exists_subset_inter _ h₁ _ h₂ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
exact ⟨t₃, .inr h₃, hs⟩
· rw [h.eq_generateFrom]
refine le_antisymm (le_generateFrom fun t => ?_) (generateFrom_anti <| subset_insert ∅ s)
rintro (rfl | ht)
· exact @isOpen_empty _ (generateFrom s)
· exact .basic t ht
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.insert_empty TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.insert_empty
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.diff_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (s \ {∅}) := by
refine ⟨?_, by rw [sUnion_diff_singleton_empty, h.sUnion_eq], ?_⟩
· rintro t₁ ⟨h₁, -⟩ t₂ ⟨h₂, -⟩ x hx
obtain ⟨t₃, h₃, hs⟩ := h.exists_subset_inter _ h₁ _ h₂ x hx
exact ⟨t₃, ⟨h₃, Nonempty.ne_empty ⟨x, hs.1⟩⟩, hs⟩
· rw [h.eq_generateFrom]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti diff_subset) (le_generateFrom fun t ht => ?_)
obtain rfl | he := eq_or_ne t ∅
· exact @isOpen_empty _ (generateFrom _)
· exact .basic t ⟨ht, he⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.diff_empty TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.diff_empty
/-- If a family of sets `s` generates the topology, then intersections of finite
subcollections of `s` form a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : t = generateFrom s) :
IsTopologicalBasis ((fun f => ⋂₀ f) '' { f : Set (Set α) | f.Finite ∧ f ⊆ s }) := by
subst t; letI := generateFrom s
refine ⟨?_, ?_, le_antisymm (le_generateFrom ?_) <| generateFrom_anti fun t ht => ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t₁, ⟨hft₁, ht₁b⟩, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t₂, ⟨hft₂, ht₂b⟩, rfl⟩ x h
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨hft₁.union hft₂, union_subset ht₁b ht₂b⟩, sInter_union t₁ t₂⟩, h, Subset.rfl⟩
· rw [sUnion_image, iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff]
exact fun x => ⟨∅, ⟨finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩, sInter_empty.substr <| mem_univ x⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t, ⟨hft, htb⟩, rfl⟩
exact hft.isOpen_sInter fun s hs ↦ GenerateOpen.basic _ <| htb hs
· rw [← sInter_singleton t]
exact ⟨{t}, ⟨finite_singleton t, singleton_subset_iff.2 ht⟩, rfl⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_subbasis TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_hasBasis_nhds {s : Set (Set α)}
(h_nhds : ∀ a, (𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t ↦ t ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t) id) : IsTopologicalBasis s where
exists_subset_inter t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ x hx := by
simpa only [and_assoc, (h_nhds x).mem_iff]
using (inter_mem ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₁, hx.1⟩) ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₂, hx.2⟩))
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x ↦ (h_nhds x).ex_mem
eq_generateFrom := ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
simpa only [nhds_generateFrom, and_comm] using (h_nhds x).eq_biInf
/-- If a family of open sets `s` is such that every open neighbourhood contains some
member of `s`, then `s` is a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds {s : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s, IsOpen u)
(h_nhds : ∀ (a : α) (u : Set α), a ∈ u → IsOpen u → ∃ v ∈ s, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u) :
IsTopologicalBasis s :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds <| fun a ↦
(nhds_basis_opens a).to_hasBasis' (by simpa [and_assoc] using h_nhds a)
fun t ⟨hts, hat⟩ ↦ (h_open _ hts).mem_nhds hat
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
/-- A set `s` is in the neighbourhood of `a` iff there is some basis set `t`, which
contains `a` and is itself contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by
change s ∈ (𝓝 a).sets ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom, nhds_generateFrom, biInf_sets_eq]
· simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
· rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩ := hb.1 _ hs₂ _ ht₂ _ ⟨hs₁, ht₁⟩
exact ⟨u, ⟨hu₂, hu₁⟩, le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_left),
le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_right)⟩
· rcases eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb.sUnion_eq a with ⟨i, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨i, h2, h1⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.mem_nhds_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen_iff {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by simp [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, hb.mem_nhds_iff]
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.is_open_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.nhds_hasBasis {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {a : α} :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t : Set α => t ∈ b ∧ a ∈ t) fun t => t :=
⟨fun s => hb.mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [and_assoc]⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.nhds_has_basis TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.nhds_hasBasis
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) : IsOpen s := by
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom]
exact .basic s hs
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.is_open TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) (ha : a ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
(hb.isOpen hs).mem_nhds ha
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.mem_nhds TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_subset_of_mem_open {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b)
{a : α} {u : Set α} (au : a ∈ u) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ b, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
hb.mem_nhds_iff.1 <| IsOpen.mem_nhds ou au
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_subset_of_mem_open
/-- Any open set is the union of the basis sets contained in it. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion' {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : u = ⋃₀ { s ∈ B | s ⊆ u } :=
ext fun _a =>
⟨fun ha =>
let ⟨b, hb, ab, bu⟩ := hB.exists_subset_of_mem_open ha ou
⟨b, ⟨hb, bu⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_b, ⟨_, bu⟩, ab⟩ => bu ab⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_eq_sUnion' TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion'
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨{ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }, fun _ h => h.1, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_eq_sUnion TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_iff_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} : IsOpen u ↔ ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨hB.open_eq_sUnion, fun ⟨_S, hSB, hu⟩ => hu.symm ▸ isOpen_sUnion fun _s hs => hB.isOpen (hSB hs)⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_iff_eq_sUnion TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_iff_eq_sUnion
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_iUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ (β : Type u) (f : β → Set α), (u = ⋃ i, f i) ∧ ∀ i, f i ∈ B :=
⟨↥({ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }), (↑), by
rw [← sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou, fun s => And.left s.2⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_eq_Union TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_iUnion
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.subset_of_forall_subset {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t) : s ⊆ t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs]; simpa [sUnion_subset_iff]
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.eq_of_forall_subset_iff {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s ↔ U ⊆ t) : s = t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ht]
exact congr_arg _ (Set.ext fun U ↦ and_congr_right <| h _)
/-- A point `a` is in the closure of `s` iff all basis sets containing `a` intersect `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_closure_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α}
{a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' hb.nhds_hasBasis).trans <| by simp only [and_imp]
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.mem_closure_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.mem_closure_iff
/-- A set is dense iff it has non-trivial intersection with all basis sets. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.dense_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α} :
Dense s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, Set.Nonempty o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp only [Dense, hb.mem_closure_iff]
exact ⟨fun h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩ => h a o hb ha, fun h a o hb ha => h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.dense_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.dense_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpenMap_iff {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B : Set (Set α)}
(hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun H o ho => H _ (hB.isOpen ho), fun hf o ho => ?_⟩
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' ho, sUnion_eq_iUnion, image_iUnion]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun s => hf s s.2.1
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.is_open_map_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.isOpenMap_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_nonempty_subset {B : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} (hu : u.Nonempty) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ B, Set.Nonempty v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hu
let ⟨v, vB, xv, vu⟩ := hb.exists_subset_of_mem_open hx ou
⟨v, vB, ⟨x, xv⟩, vu⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_nonempty_subset TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_nonempty_subset
theorem isTopologicalBasis_opens : IsTopologicalBasis { U : Set α | IsOpen U } :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (by tauto) (by tauto)
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_opens TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_opens
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inducing {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {T : Set (Set β)}
(hf : Inducing f) (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) : IsTopologicalBasis ((preimage f) '' T) :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds fun a ↦ by
convert (hf.basis_nhds (h.nhds_hasBasis (a := f a))).to_image_id with s
aesop
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.inducing TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.inducing
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.induced [s : TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{T : Set (Set β)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f s) ((preimage f) '' T) :=
h.inducing (t := induced f s) (inducing_induced f)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {B₁ B₂ : Set (Set β)}
(h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁) B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₂) B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁ ⊓ t₂) (image2 (· ∩ ·) B₁ B₂) := by
refine .of_hasBasis_nhds (t := ?_) fun a ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_inf (t₁ := t₁)]
convert ((h₁.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₁)).inf (h₂.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₂))).to_image_id
aesop
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf_induced {γ} [s : TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) (f₁ : γ → α)
(f₂ : γ → β) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f₁ t ⊓ induced f₂ s) (image2 (f₁ ⁻¹' · ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' ·) B₁ B₂) := by
simpa only [image2_image_left, image2_image_right] using (h₁.induced f₁).inf (h₂.induced f₂)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.prod {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) B₁ B₂) :=
h₁.inf_induced h₂ Prod.fst Prod.snd
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.prod TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.prod
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_cover {ι} {U : ι → Set α} (Uo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i))
(Uc : ⋃ i, U i = univ) {b : ∀ i, Set (Set (U i))} (hb : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (b i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (⋃ i : ι, image ((↑) : U i → α) '' b i) := by
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun u hu => ?_) ?_
· simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨i, s, sb, rfl⟩
exact (Uo i).isOpenMap_subtype_val _ ((hb i).isOpen sb)
· intro a u ha uo
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 Uc a with ⟨i, hi⟩
lift a to ↥(U i) using hi
rcases (hb i).exists_subset_of_mem_open ha (uo.preimage continuous_subtype_val) with
⟨v, hvb, hav, hvu⟩
exact ⟨(↑) '' v, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, mem_image_of_mem _ hvb⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hav,
image_subset_iff.2 hvu⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_cover TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_cover
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.continuous_iff {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{B : Set (Set β)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [hB.eq_generateFrom, continuous_generateFrom_iff]
@[deprecated]
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.continuous {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {B : Set (Set β)}
(hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s)) : Continuous f :=
hB.continuous_iff.2 hf
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.continuous TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.continuous
variable (α)
/-- A separable space is one with a countable dense subset, available through
`TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense`. If `α` is also known to be nonempty, then
`TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` provides a sequence `ℕ → α` with dense range, see
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` is a uniform space with countably generated uniformity filter (e.g., an `EMetricSpace`), then
this condition is equivalent to `SecondCountableTopology α`. In this case the
latter should be used as a typeclass argument in theorems because Lean can automatically deduce
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace` from `SecondCountableTopology` but it can't
deduce `SecondCountableTopology` from `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`.
Porting note (#11215): TODO: the previous paragraph describes the state of the art in Lean 3.
We can have instance cycles in Lean 4 but we might want to
postpone adding them till after the port. -/
@[mk_iff] class SeparableSpace : Prop where
/-- There exists a countable dense set. -/
exists_countable_dense : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s
#align topological_space.separable_space TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace
theorem exists_countable_dense [SeparableSpace α] : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s :=
SeparableSpace.exists_countable_dense
#align topological_space.exists_countable_dense TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense
/-- A nonempty separable space admits a sequence with dense range. Instead of running `cases` on the
conclusion of this lemma, you might want to use `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` and
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
theorem exists_dense_seq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ∃ u : ℕ → α, DenseRange u := by
obtain ⟨s : Set α, hs, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
cases' Set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range.mp hs with u hu
exact ⟨u, s_dense.mono hu⟩
#align topological_space.exists_dense_seq TopologicalSpace.exists_dense_seq
/-- A dense sequence in a non-empty separable topological space.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
def denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ℕ → α :=
Classical.choose (exists_dense_seq α)
#align topological_space.dense_seq TopologicalSpace.denseSeq
/-- The sequence `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq α` has dense range. -/
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : DenseRange (denseSeq α) :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_dense_seq α)
#align topological_space.dense_range_dense_seq TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq
variable {α}
instance (priority := 100) Countable.to_separableSpace [Countable α] : SeparableSpace α where
exists_countable_dense := ⟨Set.univ, Set.countable_univ, dense_univ⟩
#align topological_space.countable.to_separable_space TopologicalSpace.Countable.to_separableSpace
/-- If `f` has a dense range and its domain is countable, then its codomain is a separable space.
See also `DenseRange.separableSpace`. -/
theorem SeparableSpace.of_denseRange {ι : Sort _} [Countable ι] (u : ι → α) (hu : DenseRange u) :
SeparableSpace α :=
⟨⟨range u, countable_range u, hu⟩⟩
#align topological_space.separable_space_of_dense_range TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace.of_denseRange
alias _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace' := SeparableSpace.of_denseRange
/-- If `α` is a separable space and `f : α → β` is a continuous map with dense range, then `β` is
a separable space as well. E.g., the completion of a separable uniform space is separable. -/
protected theorem _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (h : DenseRange f) (h' : Continuous f) : SeparableSpace β :=
let ⟨s, s_cnt, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
⟨⟨f '' s, Countable.image s_cnt f, h.dense_image h' s_dense⟩⟩
#align dense_range.separable_space DenseRange.separableSpace
theorem _root_.QuotientMap.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : QuotientMap f) : SeparableSpace β :=
hf.surjective.denseRange.separableSpace hf.continuous
/-- The product of two separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [SeparableSpace α] [SeparableSpace β] : SeparableSpace (α × β) := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd⟩
rcases exists_countable_dense β with ⟨t, htc, htd⟩
exact ⟨⟨s ×ˢ t, hsc.prod htc, hsd.prod htd⟩⟩
/-- The product of a countable family of separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, SeparableSpace (X i)]
[Countable ι] : SeparableSpace (∀ i, X i) := by
choose t htc htd using (exists_countable_dense <| X ·)
haveI := fun i ↦ (htc i).to_subtype
nontriviality ∀ i, X i; inhabit ∀ i, X i
classical
set f : (Σ I : Finset ι, ∀ i : I, t i) → ∀ i, X i := fun ⟨I, g⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then g ⟨i, hi⟩ else (default : ∀ i, X i) i
refine ⟨⟨range f, countable_range f, dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU ⟨g, hg⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 hU g hg with ⟨I, u, huo, huU⟩
have : ∀ i : I, ∃ y ∈ t i, y ∈ u i := fun i ↦
(htd i).exists_mem_open (huo i i.2).1 ⟨_, (huo i i.2).2⟩
choose y hyt hyu using this
lift y to ∀ i : I, t i using hyt
refine ⟨f ⟨I, y⟩, huU fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_, mem_range_self _⟩
simp only [f, dif_pos hi]
exact hyu _
instance [SeparableSpace α] {r : α → α → Prop} : SeparableSpace (Quot r) :=
quotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
instance [SeparableSpace α] {s : Setoid α} : SeparableSpace (Quotient s) :=
quotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
/-- A topological space with discrete topology is separable iff it is countable. -/
theorem separableSpace_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology α] : SeparableSpace α ↔ Countable α := by
simp [separableSpace_iff, countable_univ_iff]
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Pairwise.countable_of_isOpen_disjoint [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i, (s i).Nonempty) : Countable ι := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨u, u_countable, u_dense⟩
choose f hfu hfs using fun i ↦ u_dense.exists_mem_open (ho i) (hne i)
have f_inj : Injective f := fun i j hij ↦
hd.eq <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨f i, hfs i, hij.symm ▸ hfs j⟩
have := u_countable.to_subtype
exact (f_inj.codRestrict hfu).countable
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_isOpen [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s) (ho : ∀ i ∈ a, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i ∈ a, (s i).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.subtype _ _).countable_of_isOpen_disjoint (Subtype.forall.2 ho) (Subtype.forall.2 hne)
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.countable_of_is_open Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_isOpen
/-- In a separable space, a family of disjoint sets with nonempty interiors is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s)
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, (interior (s i)).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.mono fun _ => interior_subset).countable_of_isOpen (fun _ _ => isOpen_interior) ha
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior
/-- A set `s` in a topological space is separable if it is contained in the closure of a countable
set `c`. Beware that this definition does not require that `c` is contained in `s` (to express the
latter, use `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace s` or
`TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (univ : Set s))`. In metric spaces, the two definitions are
equivalent, see `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace`. -/
def IsSeparable (s : Set α) :=
∃ c : Set α, c.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure c
#align topological_space.is_separable TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable
theorem IsSeparable.mono {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : u ⊆ s) : IsSeparable u := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hs⟩
exact ⟨c, c_count, hu.trans hs⟩
#align topological_space.is_separable.mono TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.mono
theorem IsSeparable.iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) : IsSeparable (⋃ i, s i) := by
choose c hc h'c using hs
refine ⟨⋃ i, c i, countable_iUnion hc, iUnion_subset_iff.2 fun i => ?_⟩
exact (h'c i).trans (closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ i))
#align topological_space.is_separable_Union TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.iUnion
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
IsSeparable (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i) :=
⟨fun h i ↦ h.mono <| subset_iUnion s i, .iUnion⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_union {s t : Set α} : IsSeparable (s ∪ t) ↔ IsSeparable s ∧ IsSeparable t := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, and_comm]
theorem IsSeparable.union {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : IsSeparable u) :
IsSeparable (s ∪ u) :=
isSeparable_union.2 ⟨hs, hu⟩
#align topological_space.is_separable.union TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.union
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_closure : IsSeparable (closure s) ↔ IsSeparable s := by
simp only [IsSeparable, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
protected alias ⟨_, IsSeparable.closure⟩ := isSeparable_closure
#align topological_space.is_separable.closure TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.closure
theorem _root_.Set.Countable.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : IsSeparable s :=
⟨s, hs, subset_closure⟩
#align set.countable.is_separable Set.Countable.isSeparable
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : IsSeparable s :=
hs.countable.isSeparable
#align set.finite.is_separable Set.Finite.isSeparable
theorem IsSeparable.univ_pi {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {X : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (X i)}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] (h : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) :
IsSeparable (univ.pi s) := by
classical
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (univ.pi s) with he | ⟨f₀, -⟩
· rw [he]
exact countable_empty.isSeparable
· choose c c_count hc using h
haveI := fun i ↦ (c_count i).to_subtype
set g : (I : Finset ι) × ((i : I) → c i) → (i : ι) → X i := fun ⟨I, f⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then f ⟨i, hi⟩ else f₀ i
refine ⟨range g, countable_range g, fun f hf ↦ mem_closure_iff.2 fun o ho hfo ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 ho f hfo with ⟨I, u, huo, hI⟩
rsuffices ⟨f, hf⟩ : ∃ f : (i : I) → c i, g ⟨I, f⟩ ∈ Set.pi I u
· exact ⟨g ⟨I, f⟩, hI hf, mem_range_self _⟩
suffices H : ∀ i ∈ I, (u i ∩ c i).Nonempty by
choose f hfu hfc using H
refine ⟨fun i ↦ ⟨f i i.2, hfc i i.2⟩, fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [g, dif_pos hi] using hfu i hi
intro i hi
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (hc i <| hf _ trivial) _ (huo i hi).1 (huo i hi).2
lemma isSeparable_pi {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {α : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (h : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) :
IsSeparable {f : ∀ i, α i | ∀ i, f i ∈ s i} := by
simpa only [← mem_univ_pi] using IsSeparable.univ_pi h
lemma IsSeparable.prod {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsSeparable s) (ht : IsSeparable t) :
IsSeparable (s ×ˢ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨cs, cs_count, hcs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨ct, ct_count, hct⟩
refine ⟨cs ×ˢ ct, cs_count.prod ct_count, ?_⟩
rw [closure_prod_eq]
gcongr
theorem IsSeparable.image {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s)
{f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) : IsSeparable (f '' s) := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hc⟩
refine ⟨f '' c, c_count.image _, ?_⟩
rw [image_subset_iff]
exact hc.trans (closure_subset_preimage_closure_image hf)
#align topological_space.is_separable.image TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.image
| Mathlib/Topology/Bases.lean | 539 | 542 | theorem _root_.Dense.isSeparable_iff (hs : Dense s) :
IsSeparable s ↔ SeparableSpace α := by |
simp_rw [IsSeparable, separableSpace_iff, dense_iff_closure_eq, ← univ_subset_iff,
← hs.closure_eq, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import data.nat.part_enat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
#align part_enat PartENat
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
#align part_enat.some PartENat.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_some PartENat.dom_some
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm x y := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add x := Part.ext' (true_and_iff _) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero x := Part.ext' (and_true_iff _) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc x y z := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (true_and_iff _).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.some_eq_coe PartENat.some_eq_natCast
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
#align part_enat.coe_inj PartENat.natCast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_coe PartENat.dom_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Sup PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
#align part_enat.le_def PartENat.le_def
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
#align part_enat.cases_on' PartENat.casesOn'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
#align part_enat.cases_on PartENat.casesOn
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (false_and_iff _) fun h => h.left.elim
#align part_enat.top_add PartENat.top_add
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
#align part_enat.add_top PartENat.add_top
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
#align part_enat.coe_get PartENat.natCast_get
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_coe' PartENat.get_natCast'
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
#align part_enat.get_coe PartENat.get_natCast
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_add_get PartENat.coe_add_get
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_add PartENat.get_add
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_zero PartENat.get_zero
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_one PartENat.get_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom) :
Part.get (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) h = (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x)) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_some PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_of_dom PartENat.dom_of_le_of_dom
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_some PartENat.dom_of_le_some
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_coe PartENat.dom_of_le_natCast
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by rw [le_def])
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
#align part_enat.decidable_le PartENat.decidableLe
-- Porting note: Removed. Use `Nat.castAddMonoidHom` instead.
#noalign part_enat.coe_hom
#noalign part_enat.coe_coe_hom
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
#align part_enat.lt_def PartENat.lt_def
noncomputable instance orderedAddCommMonoid : OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder, PartENat.addCommMonoid with
add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
#align part_enat.semilattice_sup PartENat.semilatticeSup
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
#align part_enat.order_bot PartENat.orderBot
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
#align part_enat.order_top PartENat.orderTop
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
#align part_enat.coe_le_coe PartENat.coe_le_coe
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` --/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
#align part_enat.coe_lt_coe PartENat.coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_le_get PartENat.get_le_get
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
#align part_enat.le_coe_iff PartENat.le_coe_iff
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_iff PartENat.lt_coe_iff
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_le_iff PartENat.coe_le_iff
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_lt_iff PartENat.coe_lt_iff
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
#align part_enat.eq_zero_iff PartENat.eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
#align part_enat.ne_zero_iff PartENat.ne_zero_iff
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
#align part_enat.dom_of_lt PartENat.dom_of_lt
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
#align part_enat.top_eq_none PartENat.top_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
#align part_enat.coe_lt_top PartENat.natCast_lt_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.coe_ne_top PartENat.natCast_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.not_is_max_coe PartENat.not_isMax_natCast
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff PartENat.ne_top_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff_dom PartENat.ne_top_iff_dom
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
#align part_enat.not_dom_iff_eq_top PartENat.not_dom_iff_eq_top
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
#align part_enat.ne_top_of_lt PartENat.ne_top_of_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_le PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_le
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [iff_true_iff, le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
#align part_enat.pos_iff_one_le PartENat.pos_iff_one_le
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
-- Porting note: was `max_def := @sup_eq_maxDefault _ _ (id _) _ }`
max_def := fun a b => by
change (fun a b => a ⊔ b) a b = _
rw [@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (id _) _]
rfl }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
noncomputable instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup, PartENat.orderBot,
PartENat.orderedAddCommMonoid with
le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun a =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
#align part_enat.eq_coe_sub_of_add_eq_coe PartENat.eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
-- Porting note: was apply_mod_cast natCast_lt_top
norm_cast; apply natCast_lt_top
norm_cast at h
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h`
norm_cast; apply add_lt_add_right h
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_right PartENat.add_lt_add_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_right PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_left PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
#align part_enat.lt_add_iff_pos_right PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
#align part_enat.lt_add_one PartENat.lt_add_one
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.le_of_lt_add_one PartENat.le_of_lt_add_one
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.succ_le_of_lt; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_of_lt PartENat.add_one_le_of_lt
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_of_succ_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_iff_lt PartENat.add_one_le_iff_lt
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
#align part_enat.coe_succ_le_succ_iff PartENat.coe_succ_le_iff
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_succ_of_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.lt_add_one_iff_lt PartENat.lt_add_one_iff_lt
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le PartENat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
#align part_enat.add_eq_top_iff PartENat.add_eq_top_iff
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
#align part_enat.add_right_cancel_iff PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
#align part_enat.add_left_cancel_iff PartENat.add_left_cancel_iff
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
#align part_enat.to_with_top PartENat.toWithTop
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top PartENat.toWithTop_top
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top' PartENat.toWithTop_top'
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_zero PartENat.toWithTop_zero
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
#align part_enat.to_with_top_zero' PartENat.toWithTop_zero'
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_some PartENat.toWithTop_some
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
#align part_enat.to_with_top_coe PartENat.toWithTop_natCast
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
#align part_enat.to_with_top_coe' PartENat.toWithTop_natCast'
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] {_ : Decidable (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat)) = OfNat.ofNat n := toWithTop_natCast' n
-- Porting note: statement changed. Mathlib 3 statement was
-- ```
-- @[simp] lemma to_with_top_le {x y : part_enat} :
-- Π [decidable x.dom] [decidable y.dom], by exactI to_with_top x ≤ to_with_top y ↔ x ≤ y :=
-- ```
-- This used to be really slow to typecheck when the definition of `ENat`
-- was still `deriving AddCommMonoidWithOne`. Now that I removed that it is fine.
-- (The problem was that the last `simp` got stuck at `CharZero ℕ∞ ≟ CharZero ℕ∞` where
-- one side used `instENatAddCommMonoidWithOne` and the other used
-- `NonAssocSemiring.toAddCommMonoidWithOne`. Now the former doesn't exist anymore.)
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_le {x y : PartENat} [hx : Decidable x.Dom] [hy : Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x ≤ toWithTop y ↔ x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hy
· simp
induction x using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hx
· simp
· simp -- Porting note: this takes too long.
#align part_enat.to_with_top_le PartENat.toWithTop_le
/-
Porting note: As part of the investigation above, I noticed that Lean4 does not
find the following two instances which it could find in Lean3 automatically:
```
#synth Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom
variable {n : ℕ}
#synth Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom
```
-/
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_lt {x y : PartENat} [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x < toWithTop y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le toWithTop_le
#align part_enat.to_with_top_lt PartENat.toWithTop_lt
end WithTop
-- Porting note: new, extracted from `withTopEquiv`.
/-- Coercion from `ℕ∞` to `PartENat`. -/
@[coe]
def ofENat : ℕ∞ → PartENat :=
fun x => match x with
| Option.none => none
| Option.some n => some n
-- Porting note (#10754): new instance
instance : Coe ℕ∞ PartENat := ⟨ofENat⟩
-- Porting note: new. This could probably be moved to tests or removed.
example (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℕ∞) : PartENat) = ↑n := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_coe (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ofENat (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toWithTop_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop (↑n) = n := by
cases n with
| top => simp
| coe n => simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_toWithTop (x : PartENat) {_ : Decidable (x : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop x = x := by
induction x using PartENat.casesOn <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_le {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x ≤ ofENat y ↔ x ≤ y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_le, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x < ofENat y ↔ x < y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_lt, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
section WithTopEquiv
open scoped Classical
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_add {x y : PartENat} : toWithTop (x + y) = toWithTop x + toWithTop y := by
refine PartENat.casesOn y ?_ ?_ <;> refine PartENat.casesOn x ?_ ?_
-- Porting note: was `simp [← Nat.cast_add, ← ENat.coe_add]`
· simp only [add_top, toWithTop_top', _root_.add_top]
· simp only [add_top, toWithTop_top', toWithTop_natCast', _root_.add_top, forall_const]
· simp only [top_add, toWithTop_top', toWithTop_natCast', _root_.top_add, forall_const]
· simp_rw [toWithTop_natCast', ← Nat.cast_add, toWithTop_natCast', forall_const]
#align part_enat.to_with_top_add PartENat.toWithTop_add
/-- `Equiv` between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞` (for the order isomorphism see
`withTopOrderIso`). -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def withTopEquiv : PartENat ≃ ℕ∞ where
toFun x := toWithTop x
invFun x := ↑x
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv PartENat.withTopEquiv
theorem withTopEquiv_top : withTopEquiv ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_top PartENat.withTopEquiv_top
theorem withTopEquiv_natCast (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv n = n := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_coe PartENat.withTopEquiv_natCast
theorem withTopEquiv_zero : withTopEquiv 0 = 0 := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_zero PartENat.withTopEquiv_zero
theorem withTopEquiv_one : withTopEquiv 1 = 1 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_le {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x ≤ withTopEquiv y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_le PartENat.withTopEquiv_le
theorem withTopEquiv_lt {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x < withTopEquiv y ↔ x < y := by
simp
#align part_enat.with_top_equiv_lt PartENat.withTopEquiv_lt
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 779 | 780 | theorem withTopEquiv_symm_top : withTopEquiv.symm ⊤ = ⊤ := by |
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.ZPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.integral.circle_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `circleMap c R`: the exponential map $θ ↦ c + R e^{θi}$;
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see #10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### `circleMap`, a parametrization of a circle
-/
/-- The exponential map $θ ↦ c + R e^{θi}$. The range of this map is the circle in `ℂ` with center
`c` and radius `|R|`. -/
def circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : ℝ → ℂ := fun θ => c + R * exp (θ * I)
#align circle_map circleMap
/-- `circleMap` is `2π`-periodic. -/
theorem periodic_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Periodic (circleMap c R) (2 * π) := fun θ => by
simp [circleMap, add_mul, exp_periodic _]
#align periodic_circle_map periodic_circleMap
theorem Set.Countable.preimage_circleMap {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (c : ℂ) {R : ℝ}
(hR : R ≠ 0) : (circleMap c R ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
show (((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) ⁻¹' ((· * I) ⁻¹'
(exp ⁻¹' ((R * ·) ⁻¹' ((c + ·) ⁻¹' s))))).Countable from
(((hs.preimage (add_right_injective _)).preimage <|
mul_right_injective₀ <| ofReal_ne_zero.2 hR).preimage_cexp.preimage <|
mul_left_injective₀ I_ne_zero).preimage ofReal_injective
#align set.countable.preimage_circle_map Set.Countable.preimage_circleMap
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 105 | 106 | theorem circleMap_sub_center (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : circleMap c R θ - c = circleMap 0 R θ := by |
simp [circleMap]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
#align_import geometry.euclidean.circumcenter from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Circumcenter and circumradius
This file proves some lemmas on points equidistant from a set of
points, and defines the circumradius and circumcenter of a simplex.
There are also some definitions for use in calculations where it is
convenient to work with affine combinations of vertices together with
the circumcenter.
## Main definitions
* `circumcenter` and `circumradius` are the circumcenter and
circumradius of a simplex.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumscribed_circle
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
open AffineSubspace
/-- `p` is equidistant from two points in `s` if and only if its
`orthogonalProjection` is. -/
theorem dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] {p1 p2 : P} (p3 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
dist p1 p3 = dist p2 p3 ↔
dist p1 (orthogonalProjection s p3) = dist p2 (orthogonalProjection s p3) := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg, ←
mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg,
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p3 hp1,
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p3 hp2]
simp
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq
/-- `p` is equidistant from a set of points in `s` if and only if its
`orthogonalProjection` is. -/
theorem dist_set_eq_iff_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] {ps : Set P} (hps : ps ⊆ s) (p : P) :
(Set.Pairwise ps fun p1 p2 => dist p1 p = dist p2 p) ↔
Set.Pairwise ps fun p1 p2 =>
dist p1 (orthogonalProjection s p) = dist p2 (orthogonalProjection s p) :=
⟨fun h _ hp1 _ hp2 hne =>
(dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq p (hps hp1) (hps hp2)).1 (h hp1 hp2 hne),
fun h _ hp1 _ hp2 hne =>
(dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq p (hps hp1) (hps hp2)).2 (h hp1 hp2 hne)⟩
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_set_eq_iff_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq EuclideanGeometry.dist_set_eq_iff_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq
/-- There exists `r` such that `p` has distance `r` from all the
points of a set of points in `s` if and only if there exists (possibly
different) `r` such that its `orthogonalProjection` has that distance
from all the points in that set. -/
theorem exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} [Nonempty s]
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] {ps : Set P} (hps : ps ⊆ s) (p : P) :
(∃ r, ∀ p1 ∈ ps, dist p1 p = r) ↔ ∃ r, ∀ p1 ∈ ps, dist p1 ↑(orthogonalProjection s p) = r := by
have h := dist_set_eq_iff_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq hps p
simp_rw [Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq] at h
exact h
#align euclidean_geometry.exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq EuclideanGeometry.exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq
/-- The induction step for the existence and uniqueness of the
circumcenter. Given a nonempty set of points in a nonempty affine
subspace whose direction is complete, such that there is a unique
(circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points in that subspace,
and a point `p` not in that subspace, there is a unique (circumcenter,
circumradius) pair for the set with `p` added, in the span of the
subspace with `p` added. -/
theorem existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P}
[HasOrthogonalProjection s.direction] {ps : Set P} (hnps : ps.Nonempty) {p : P} (hps : ps ⊆ s)
(hp : p ∉ s) (hu : ∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ s ∧ ps ⊆ (cs : Set P)) :
∃! cs₂ : Sphere P,
cs₂.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (s : Set P)) ∧ insert p ps ⊆ (cs₂ : Set P) := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.Nonempty.to_subtype (hnps.mono hps)
rcases hu with ⟨⟨cc, cr⟩, ⟨hcc, hcr⟩, hcccru⟩
simp only at hcc hcr hcccru
let x := dist cc (orthogonalProjection s p)
let y := dist p (orthogonalProjection s p)
have hy0 : y ≠ 0 := dist_orthogonalProjection_ne_zero_of_not_mem hp
let ycc₂ := (x * x + y * y - cr * cr) / (2 * y)
let cc₂ := (ycc₂ / y) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ cc
let cr₂ := √(cr * cr + ycc₂ * ycc₂)
use ⟨cc₂, cr₂⟩
simp (config := { zeta := false, proj := false }) only
have hpo : p = (1 : ℝ) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ (orthogonalProjection s p : P) :=
by simp
constructor
· constructor
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ (mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hcc))
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(vsub_mem_vectorSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (orthogonalProjection_mem _)))
· intro p1 hp1
rw [Sphere.mem_coe, mem_sphere, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))]
cases' hp1 with hp1 hp1
· rw [hp1]
rw [hpo,
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, dist_comm _ cc]
field_simp [ycc₂, hy0]
ring
· rw [dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp1),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc, Subtype.coe_mk,
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp1 hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V cc₂ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ hy0, abs_mul_abs_self]
· rintro ⟨cc₃, cr₃⟩ ⟨hcc₃, hcr₃⟩
simp only at hcc₃ hcr₃
obtain ⟨t₃, cc₃', hcc₃', hcc₃''⟩ :
∃ r : ℝ, ∃ p0 ∈ s, cc₃ = r • (p -ᵥ ↑((orthogonalProjection s) p)) +ᵥ p0 := by
rwa [mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)] at hcc₃
have hcr₃' : ∃ r, ∀ p1 ∈ ps, dist p1 cc₃ = r :=
⟨cr₃, fun p1 hp1 => dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp1) hcr₃⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq hps cc₃, hcc₃'',
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃'] at hcr₃'
cases' hcr₃' with cr₃' hcr₃'
have hu := hcccru ⟨cc₃', cr₃'⟩
simp only at hu
replace hu := hu ⟨hcc₃', hcr₃'⟩
-- Porting note: was
-- cases' hu with hucc hucr
-- substs hucc hucr
cases' hu
have hcr₃val : cr₃ = √(cr * cr + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)) := by
cases' hnps with p0 hp0
have h' : ↑(⟨cc, hcc₃'⟩ : s) = cc := rfl
rw [← dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp0) hcr₃, hcc₃'', ←
mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)),
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp0),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃', h',
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp0 hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ |t₃|, ← mul_assoc,
abs_mul_abs_self]
ring
replace hcr₃ := dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert _ _) hcr₃
rw [hpo, hcc₃'', hcr₃val, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc₃' _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
dist_comm, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))] at hcr₃
change x * x + _ * (y * y) = _ at hcr₃
rw [show
x * x + (1 - t₃) * (1 - t₃) * (y * y) = x * x + y * y - 2 * y * (t₃ * y) + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)
by ring,
add_left_inj] at hcr₃
have ht₃ : t₃ = ycc₂ / y := by field_simp [ycc₂, ← hcr₃, hy0]
subst ht₃
change cc₃ = cc₂ at hcc₃''
congr
rw [hcr₃val]
congr 2
field_simp [hy0]
#align euclidean_geometry.exists_unique_dist_eq_of_insert EuclideanGeometry.existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert
/-- Given a finite nonempty affinely independent family of points,
there is a unique (circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points
in the affine subspace they span. -/
theorem _root_.AffineIndependent.existsUnique_dist_eq {ι : Type*} [hne : Nonempty ι] [Finite ι]
{p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent ℝ p) :
∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range p) ∧ Set.range p ⊆ (cs : Set P) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
induction' hn : Fintype.card ι with m hm generalizing ι
· exfalso
have h := Fintype.card_pos_iff.2 hne
rw [hn] at h
exact lt_irrefl 0 h
· cases' m with m
· rw [Fintype.card_eq_one_iff] at hn
cases' hn with i hi
haveI : Unique ι := ⟨⟨i⟩, hi⟩
use ⟨p i, 0⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton]
constructor
· simp_rw [hi default, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨⟨⟩, by simp only [Metric.sphere_zero, Set.mem_singleton_iff]⟩
· rintro ⟨cc, cr⟩
simp only
rintro ⟨rfl, hdist⟩
simp? [Set.singleton_subset_iff] at hdist says
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, Metric.mem_sphere, dist_self] at hdist
rw [hi default, hdist]
· have i := hne.some
let ι2 := { x // x ≠ i }
have hc : Fintype.card ι2 = m + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype (Finset.univ.filter fun x => x ≠ i)]
· rw [Finset.filter_not]
-- Porting note: removed `simp_rw [eq_comm]` and used `filter_eq'` instead of `filter_eq`
rw [Finset.filter_eq' _ i, if_pos (Finset.mem_univ _),
Finset.card_sdiff (Finset.subset_univ _), Finset.card_singleton, Finset.card_univ, hn]
simp
· simp
haveI : Nonempty ι2 := Fintype.card_pos_iff.1 (hc.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_succ _)
have ha2 : AffineIndependent ℝ fun i2 : ι2 => p i2 := ha.subtype _
replace hm := hm ha2 _ hc
have hr : Set.range p = insert (p i) (Set.range fun i2 : ι2 => p i2) := by
change _ = insert _ (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2)
rw [← Set.image_eq_range, ← Set.image_univ, ← Set.image_insert_eq]
congr with j
simp [Classical.em]
rw [hr, ← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan]
refine existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert (Set.range_nonempty _) (subset_spanPoints ℝ _) ?_ hm
convert ha.not_mem_affineSpan_diff i Set.univ
change (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2) = _
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
congr with j
simp
#align affine_independent.exists_unique_dist_eq AffineIndependent.existsUnique_dist_eq
end EuclideanGeometry
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The circumsphere of a simplex. -/
def circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : Sphere P :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere Affine.Simplex.circumsphere
/-- The property satisfied by the circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_unique_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
(s.circumsphere.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧
Set.range s.points ⊆ s.circumsphere) ∧
∀ cs : Sphere P,
cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧ Set.range s.points ⊆ cs →
cs = s.circumsphere :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose_spec
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex. -/
def circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
s.circumsphere.center
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter Affine.Simplex.circumcenter
/-- The circumradius of a simplex. -/
def circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : ℝ :=
s.circumsphere.radius
#align affine.simplex.circumradius Affine.Simplex.circumradius
/-- The center of the circumsphere is the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_center {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.center = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_center Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_center
/-- The radius of the circumsphere is the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_radius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.radius = s.circumradius :=
rfl
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_radius Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_radius
/-- The circumcenter lies in the affine span. -/
theorem circumcenter_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_mem_affine_span Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
/-- All points have distance from the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter = s.circumradius :=
dist_of_mem_subset_sphere (Set.mem_range_self _) s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
#align affine.simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius Affine.Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
/-- All points lie in the circumsphere. -/
theorem mem_circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i ∈ s.circumsphere :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius i
#align affine.simplex.mem_circumsphere Affine.Simplex.mem_circumsphere
/-- All points have distance to the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist s.circumcenter (s.points i) = s.circumradius := by
intro i
rw [dist_comm]
exact dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ _
#align affine.simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' Affine.Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius'
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that point is the circumcenter. -/
theorem eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
p = s.circumcenter := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.1
#align affine.simplex.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that distance is the circumradius. -/
theorem eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
r = s.circumradius := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and_iff] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and_iff] at h
exact h.2
#align affine.simplex.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq
/-- The circumradius is non-negative. -/
theorem circumradius_nonneg {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : 0 ≤ s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius 0 ▸ dist_nonneg
#align affine.simplex.circumradius_nonneg Affine.Simplex.circumradius_nonneg
/-- The circumradius of a simplex with at least two points is
positive. -/
theorem circumradius_pos {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) : 0 < s.circumradius := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne s.circumradius_nonneg ?_
intro h
have hr := s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
simp_rw [← h, dist_eq_zero] at hr
have h01 := s.independent.injective.ne (by simp : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1)
simp [hr] at h01
#align affine.simplex.circumradius_pos Affine.Simplex.circumradius_pos
/-- The circumcenter of a 0-simplex equals its unique point. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_point (s : Simplex ℝ P 0) (i : Fin 1) : s.circumcenter = s.points i := by
have h := s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have : Unique (Fin 1) := ⟨⟨0, by decide⟩, fun a => by simp only [Fin.eq_zero]⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton] at h
rw [h]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_eq_point Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_eq_point
/-- The circumcenter of a 1-simplex equals its centroid. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_centroid (s : Simplex ℝ P 1) :
s.circumcenter = Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points := by
have hr :
Set.Pairwise Set.univ fun i j : Fin 2 =>
dist (s.points i) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) =
dist (s.points j) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) := by
intro i hi j hj hij
rw [Finset.centroid_pair_fin, dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points i),
dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points j), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ←
one_smul ℝ (s.points i -ᵥ s.points 0), ← one_smul ℝ (s.points j -ᵥ s.points 0)]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [-one_smul, ← sub_smul] <;> norm_num
rw [Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq] at hr
cases' hr with r hr
exact
(s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (Finset.card_fin 2)) fun i =>
hr i (Set.mem_univ _)).symm
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_eq_centroid Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_eq_centroid
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumsphere. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumsphere = s.circumsphere := by
refine s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 _ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [← s.reindex_range_points e]
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_reindex Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_reindex
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumcenter_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumcenter = s.circumcenter := by simp_rw [circumcenter, circumsphere_reindex]
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_reindex Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_reindex
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumradius_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumradius = s.circumradius := by simp_rw [circumradius, circumsphere_reindex]
#align affine.simplex.circumradius_reindex Affine.Simplex.circumradius_reindex
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
/-- The orthogonal projection of a point `p` onto the hyperplane spanned by the simplex's points. -/
def orthogonalProjectionSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
P →ᵃ[ℝ] affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
orthogonalProjection (affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points))
#align affine.simplex.orthogonal_projection_span Affine.Simplex.orthogonalProjectionSpan
/-- Adding a vector to a point in the given subspace, then taking the
orthogonal projection, produces the original point if the vector is a
multiple of the result of subtracting a point's orthogonal projection
from that point. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
{p1 : P} (p2 : P) (r : ℝ) (hp : p1 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
s.orthogonalProjectionSpan (r • (p2 -ᵥ s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2 : V) +ᵥ p1) = ⟨p1, hp⟩ :=
EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ _
#align affine.simplex.orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection Affine.Simplex.orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection
theorem coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection {n : ℕ} {r₁ : ℝ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p p₁o : P} (hp₁o : p₁o ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan (r₁ • (p -ᵥ ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p)) +ᵥ p₁o)) = p₁o :=
congrArg ((↑) : _ → P) (orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ _ hp₁o)
#align affine.simplex.coe_orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection Affine.Simplex.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection
theorem dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p1 : P} (p2 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p1 p2 * dist p1 p2 =
dist p1 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) * dist p1 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) +
dist p2 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) * dist p2 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) := by
rw [PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm p2 _, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 _, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 _,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p2, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p1 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) p2,
norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero]
exact
Submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal (vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction p2 hp1)
(orthogonalProjection_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal _ p2)
#align affine.simplex.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq Affine.Simplex.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Circumcenter.lean | 448 | 455 | theorem dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p₁ : P}
(h₁ : ∀ i : Fin (n + 1), dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₁' : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = s.circumcenter)
(h : s.points 0 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius := by |
rw [dist_comm, ← h₁ 0,
s.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p₁ h]
simp only [h₁', dist_comm p₁, add_sub_cancel_left, Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.well_known from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8199f6717c150a7fe91c4534175f4cf99725978f"
/-!
# Definition of well-known power series
In this file we define the following power series:
* `PowerSeries.invUnitsSub`: given `u : Rˣ`, this is the series for `1 / (u - x)`.
It is given by `∑ n, x ^ n /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)`.
* `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow`: given a commutative ring `S` and a number `d : ℕ`,
`PowerSeries.invOneSubPow d : S⟦X⟧ˣ` is the power series `∑ n, Nat.choose (d + n) d`
whose multiplicative inverse is `(1 - X) ^ (d + 1)`.
* `PowerSeries.sin`, `PowerSeries.cos`, `PowerSeries.exp` : power series for sin, cosine, and
exponential functions.
-/
namespace PowerSeries
section Ring
variable {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
/-- The power series for `1 / (u - x)`. -/
def invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) : PowerSeries R :=
mk fun n => 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)
#align power_series.inv_units_sub PowerSeries.invUnitsSub
@[simp]
theorem coeff_invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (invUnitsSub u) = 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1) :=
coeff_mk _ _
#align power_series.coeff_inv_units_sub PowerSeries.coeff_invUnitsSub
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) : constantCoeff R (invUnitsSub u) = 1 /ₚ u := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_invUnitsSub, zero_add, pow_one]
#align power_series.constant_coeff_inv_units_sub PowerSeries.constantCoeff_invUnitsSub
@[simp]
theorem invUnitsSub_mul_X (u : Rˣ) : invUnitsSub u * X = invUnitsSub u * C R u - 1 := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp
· simp [n.succ_ne_zero, pow_succ']
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align power_series.inv_units_sub_mul_X PowerSeries.invUnitsSub_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem invUnitsSub_mul_sub (u : Rˣ) : invUnitsSub u * (C R u - X) = 1 := by
simp [mul_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
#align power_series.inv_units_sub_mul_sub PowerSeries.invUnitsSub_mul_sub
theorem map_invUnitsSub (f : R →+* S) (u : Rˣ) :
map f (invUnitsSub u) = invUnitsSub (Units.map (f : R →* S) u) := by
ext
simp only [← map_pow, coeff_map, coeff_invUnitsSub, one_divp]
rfl
#align power_series.map_inv_units_sub PowerSeries.map_invUnitsSub
end Ring
section invOneSubPow
variable {S : Type*} [CommRing S] (d : ℕ)
/--
(1 + X + X^2 + ...) * (1 - X) = 1.
Note that the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...` is written as `mk 1` where `1` is the constant
function so that `mk 1` is the power series with all coefficients equal to one.
-/
theorem mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one : (mk 1 : S⟦X⟧) * (1 - X) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, ext_iff]
intro n
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n => simp [sub_mul]
/--
Note that `mk 1` is the constant function `1` so the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...`. This theorem
states that for any `d : ℕ`, `(1 + X + X^2 + ... : S⟦X⟧) ^ (d + 1)` is equal to the power series
`mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧`.
-/
theorem mk_one_pow_eq_mk_choose_add :
(mk 1 : S⟦X⟧) ^ (d + 1) = (mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧) := by
induction d with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ d hd =>
ext n
rw [pow_add, hd, pow_one, mul_comm, coeff_mul]
simp_rw [coeff_mk, Pi.one_apply, one_mul]
norm_cast
rw [Finset.sum_antidiagonal_choose_add, ← Nat.choose_succ_succ, Nat.succ_eq_add_one,
add_right_comm]
/--
The power series `mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d`, whose multiplicative inverse is
`(1 - X) ^ (d + 1)`.
-/
noncomputable def invOneSubPow : S⟦X⟧ˣ where
val := mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d
inv := (1 - X) ^ (d + 1)
val_inv := by
rw [← mk_one_pow_eq_mk_choose_add, ← mul_pow, mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one, one_pow]
inv_val := by
rw [← mk_one_pow_eq_mk_choose_add, ← mul_pow, mul_comm, mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one, one_pow]
theorem invOneSubPow_val_eq_mk_choose_add :
(invOneSubPow d).val = (mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧) := rfl
theorem invOneSubPow_val_zero_eq_invUnitSub_one :
(invOneSubPow 0).val = invUnitsSub (1 : Sˣ) := by
simp [invOneSubPow, invUnitsSub]
/--
The theorem `PowerSeries.mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one` implies that `1 - X` is a unit in `S⟦X⟧`
whose inverse is the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...`. This theorem states that for any `d : ℕ`,
`PowerSeries.invOneSubPow d` is equal to `(1 - X)⁻¹ ^ (d + 1)`.
-/
theorem invOneSubPow_eq_inv_one_sub_pow :
invOneSubPow d = (Units.mkOfMulEqOne (1 - X) (mk 1 : S⟦X⟧)
<| Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one)⁻¹ ^ (d + 1) := by
rw [inv_pow]
exact (DivisionMonoid.inv_eq_of_mul _ (invOneSubPow d) <| by
rw [← Units.val_eq_one, Units.val_mul, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
exact (invOneSubPow d).inv_val).symm
theorem invOneSubPow_inv_eq_one_sub_pow :
(invOneSubPow d).inv = (1 - X : S⟦X⟧) ^ (d + 1) := rfl
end invOneSubPow
section Field
variable (A A' : Type*) [Ring A] [Ring A'] [Algebra ℚ A] [Algebra ℚ A']
open Nat
/-- Power series for the exponential function at zero. -/
def exp : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !)
#align power_series.exp PowerSeries.exp
/-- Power series for the sine function at zero. -/
def sin : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then 0 else algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !)
#align power_series.sin PowerSeries.sin
/-- Power series for the cosine function at zero. -/
def cos : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !) else 0
#align power_series.cos PowerSeries.cos
variable {A A'} [Ring A] [Ring A'] [Algebra ℚ A] [Algebra ℚ A'] (n : ℕ) (f : A →+* A')
@[simp]
theorem coeff_exp : coeff A n (exp A) = algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !) :=
coeff_mk _ _
#align power_series.coeff_exp PowerSeries.coeff_exp
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_exp : constantCoeff A (exp A) = 1 := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_exp]
simp
#align power_series.constant_coeff_exp PowerSeries.constantCoeff_exp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sin_bit0 : coeff A (bit0 n) (sin A) = 0 := by
rw [sin, coeff_mk, if_pos (even_bit0 n)]
#align power_series.coeff_sin_bit0 PowerSeries.coeff_sin_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sin_bit1 : coeff A (bit1 n) (sin A) = (-1) ^ n * coeff A (bit1 n) (exp A) := by
rw [sin, coeff_mk, if_neg n.not_even_bit1, Nat.bit1_div_two, ← mul_one_div, map_mul, map_pow,
map_neg, map_one, coeff_exp]
#align power_series.coeff_sin_bit1 PowerSeries.coeff_sin_bit1
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_cos_bit0 : coeff A (bit0 n) (cos A) = (-1) ^ n * coeff A (bit0 n) (exp A) := by
rw [cos, coeff_mk, if_pos (even_bit0 n), Nat.bit0_div_two, ← mul_one_div, map_mul, map_pow,
map_neg, map_one, coeff_exp]
#align power_series.coeff_cos_bit0 PowerSeries.coeff_cos_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_cos_bit1 : coeff A (bit1 n) (cos A) = 0 := by
rw [cos, coeff_mk, if_neg n.not_even_bit1]
#align power_series.coeff_cos_bit1 PowerSeries.coeff_cos_bit1
@[simp]
theorem map_exp : map (f : A →+* A') (exp A) = exp A' := by
ext
simp
#align power_series.map_exp PowerSeries.map_exp
@[simp]
theorem map_sin : map f (sin A) = sin A' := by
ext
simp [sin, apply_ite f]
#align power_series.map_sin PowerSeries.map_sin
@[simp]
theorem map_cos : map f (cos A) = cos A' := by
ext
simp [cos, apply_ite f]
#align power_series.map_cos PowerSeries.map_cos
end Field
open RingHom
open Finset Nat
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A]
/-- Shows that $e^{aX} * e^{bX} = e^{(a + b)X}$ -/
theorem exp_mul_exp_eq_exp_add [Algebra ℚ A] (a b : A) :
rescale a (exp A) * rescale b (exp A) = rescale (a + b) (exp A) := by
ext n
simp only [coeff_mul, exp, rescale, coeff_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, coe_mk,
factorial, Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk, add_pow, sum_mul]
apply sum_congr rfl
rintro x hx
suffices
a ^ x * b ^ (n - x) *
(algebraMap ℚ A (1 / ↑x.factorial) * algebraMap ℚ A (1 / ↑(n - x).factorial)) =
a ^ x * b ^ (n - x) * (↑(n.choose x) * (algebraMap ℚ A) (1 / ↑n.factorial))
by convert this using 1 <;> ring
congr 1
rw [← map_natCast (algebraMap ℚ A) (n.choose x), ← map_mul, ← map_mul]
refine RingHom.congr_arg _ ?_
rw [mul_one_div (↑(n.choose x) : ℚ), one_div_mul_one_div]
symm
rw [div_eq_iff, div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul, choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial]
· norm_cast
rw [cast_div_charZero]
apply factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial (mem_range_succ_iff.1 hx)
· apply mem_range_succ_iff.1 hx
· rintro h
apply factorial_ne_zero n
rw [cast_eq_zero.1 h]
#align power_series.exp_mul_exp_eq_exp_add PowerSeries.exp_mul_exp_eq_exp_add
/-- Shows that $e^{x} * e^{-x} = 1$ -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/WellKnown.lean | 260 | 261 | theorem exp_mul_exp_neg_eq_one [Algebra ℚ A] : exp A * evalNegHom (exp A) = 1 := by |
convert exp_mul_exp_eq_exp_add (1 : A) (-1) <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Paul van Wamelen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul van Wamelen
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.FLT.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.PythagoreanTriples
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import number_theory.fermat4 from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10b4e499f43088dd3bb7b5796184ad5216648ab1"
/-!
# Fermat's Last Theorem for the case n = 4
There are no non-zero integers `a`, `b` and `c` such that `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 4`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
/-- Shorthand for three non-zero integers `a`, `b`, and `c` satisfying `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2`.
We will show that no integers satisfy this equation. Clearly Fermat's Last theorem for n = 4
follows. -/
def Fermat42 (a b c : ℤ) : Prop :=
a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2
#align fermat_42 Fermat42
namespace Fermat42
theorem comm {a b c : ℤ} : Fermat42 a b c ↔ Fermat42 b a c := by
delta Fermat42
rw [add_comm]
tauto
#align fermat_42.comm Fermat42.comm
theorem mul {a b c k : ℤ} (hk0 : k ≠ 0) :
Fermat42 a b c ↔ Fermat42 (k * a) (k * b) (k ^ 2 * c) := by
delta Fermat42
constructor
· intro f42
constructor
· exact mul_ne_zero hk0 f42.1
constructor
· exact mul_ne_zero hk0 f42.2.1
· have H : a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2 := f42.2.2
linear_combination k ^ 4 * H
· intro f42
constructor
· exact right_ne_zero_of_mul f42.1
constructor
· exact right_ne_zero_of_mul f42.2.1
apply (mul_right_inj' (pow_ne_zero 4 hk0)).mp
linear_combination f42.2.2
#align fermat_42.mul Fermat42.mul
theorem ne_zero {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) : c ≠ 0 := by
apply ne_zero_pow two_ne_zero _; apply ne_of_gt
rw [← h.2.2, (by ring : a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = (a ^ 2) ^ 2 + (b ^ 2) ^ 2)]
exact
add_pos (sq_pos_of_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero 2 h.1)) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero 2 h.2.1))
#align fermat_42.ne_zero Fermat42.ne_zero
/-- We say a solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` is minimal if there is no other solution with
a smaller `c` (in absolute value). -/
def Minimal (a b c : ℤ) : Prop :=
Fermat42 a b c ∧ ∀ a1 b1 c1 : ℤ, Fermat42 a1 b1 c1 → Int.natAbs c ≤ Int.natAbs c1
#align fermat_42.minimal Fermat42.Minimal
/-- if we have a solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` then there must be a minimal one. -/
theorem exists_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) : ∃ a0 b0 c0, Minimal a0 b0 c0 := by
let S : Set ℕ := { n | ∃ s : ℤ × ℤ × ℤ, Fermat42 s.1 s.2.1 s.2.2 ∧ n = Int.natAbs s.2.2 }
have S_nonempty : S.Nonempty := by
use Int.natAbs c
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
use ⟨a, ⟨b, c⟩⟩
let m : ℕ := Nat.find S_nonempty
have m_mem : m ∈ S := Nat.find_spec S_nonempty
rcases m_mem with ⟨s0, hs0, hs1⟩
use s0.1, s0.2.1, s0.2.2, hs0
intro a1 b1 c1 h1
rw [← hs1]
apply Nat.find_min'
use ⟨a1, ⟨b1, c1⟩⟩
#align fermat_42.exists_minimal Fermat42.exists_minimal
/-- a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` must have `a` and `b` coprime. -/
theorem coprime_of_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Minimal a b c) : IsCoprime a b := by
apply Int.gcd_eq_one_iff_coprime.mp
by_contra hab
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpa, hpb⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp hab
obtain ⟨a1, rfl⟩ := Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpa
obtain ⟨b1, rfl⟩ := Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpb
have hpc : (p : ℤ) ^ 2 ∣ c := by
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, ← h.1.2.2]
apply Dvd.intro (a1 ^ 4 + b1 ^ 4)
ring
obtain ⟨c1, rfl⟩ := hpc
have hf : Fermat42 a1 b1 c1 :=
(Fermat42.mul (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.Prime.ne_zero hp))).mpr h.1
apply Nat.le_lt_asymm (h.2 _ _ _ hf)
rw [Int.natAbs_mul, lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left, Int.natAbs_pow, Int.natAbs_ofNat]
· exact Nat.one_lt_pow two_ne_zero (Nat.Prime.one_lt hp)
· exact Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Int.natAbs_ne_zero.2 (ne_zero hf))
#align fermat_42.coprime_of_minimal Fermat42.coprime_of_minimal
/-- We can swap `a` and `b` in a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2`. -/
theorem minimal_comm {a b c : ℤ} : Minimal a b c → Minimal b a c := fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨Fermat42.comm.mp h1, h2⟩
#align fermat_42.minimal_comm Fermat42.minimal_comm
/-- We can assume that a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` has positive `c`. -/
theorem neg_of_minimal {a b c : ℤ} : Minimal a b c → Minimal a b (-c) := by
rintro ⟨⟨ha, hb, heq⟩, h2⟩
constructor
· apply And.intro ha (And.intro hb _)
rw [heq]
exact (neg_sq c).symm
rwa [Int.natAbs_neg c]
#align fermat_42.neg_of_minimal Fermat42.neg_of_minimal
/-- We can assume that a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` has `a` odd. -/
theorem exists_odd_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) :
∃ a0 b0 c0, Minimal a0 b0 c0 ∧ a0 % 2 = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a0, b0, c0, hf⟩ := exists_minimal h
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one a0 with hap hap
· cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one b0 with hbp hbp
· exfalso
have h1 : 2 ∣ (Int.gcd a0 b0 : ℤ) :=
Int.dvd_gcd (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hap) (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hbp)
rw [Int.gcd_eq_one_iff_coprime.mpr (coprime_of_minimal hf)] at h1
revert h1
decide
· exact ⟨b0, ⟨a0, ⟨c0, minimal_comm hf, hbp⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨a0, ⟨b0, ⟨c0, hf, hap⟩⟩⟩
#align fermat_42.exists_odd_minimal Fermat42.exists_odd_minimal
/-- We can assume that a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` has
`a` odd and `c` positive. -/
theorem exists_pos_odd_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) :
∃ a0 b0 c0, Minimal a0 b0 c0 ∧ a0 % 2 = 1 ∧ 0 < c0 := by
obtain ⟨a0, b0, c0, hf, hc⟩ := exists_odd_minimal h
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 c0 with (h1 | h1 | h1)
· use a0, b0, c0
· exfalso
exact ne_zero hf.1 h1.symm
· use a0, b0, -c0, neg_of_minimal hf, hc
exact neg_pos.mpr h1
#align fermat_42.exists_pos_odd_minimal Fermat42.exists_pos_odd_minimal
end Fermat42
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FLT/Four.lean | 154 | 156 | theorem Int.coprime_of_sq_sum {r s : ℤ} (h2 : IsCoprime s r) : IsCoprime (r ^ 2 + s ^ 2) r := by |
rw [sq, sq]
exact (IsCoprime.mul_left h2 h2).mul_add_left_left r
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Antoine Labelle. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import representation_theory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c04bc6e93e23aa0182aba53661a2211e80b6feac"
/-!
# Monoid representations
This file introduces monoid representations and their characters and defines a few ways to construct
representations.
## Main definitions
* Representation.Representation
* Representation.character
* Representation.tprod
* Representation.linHom
* Representation.dual
## Implementation notes
Representations of a monoid `G` on a `k`-module `V` are implemented as
homomorphisms `G →* (V →ₗ[k] V)`. We use the abbreviation `Representation` for this hom space.
The theorem `asAlgebraHom_def` constructs a module over the group `k`-algebra of `G` (implemented
as `MonoidAlgebra k G`) corresponding to a representation. If `ρ : Representation k G V`, this
module can be accessed via `ρ.asModule`. Conversely, given a `MonoidAlgebra k G-module `M`
`M.ofModule` is the associociated representation seen as a homomorphism.
-/
open MonoidAlgebra (lift of)
open LinearMap
section
variable (k G V : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
/-- A representation of `G` on the `k`-module `V` is a homomorphism `G →* (V →ₗ[k] V)`.
-/
abbrev Representation :=
G →* V →ₗ[k] V
#align representation Representation
end
namespace Representation
section trivial
variable (k : Type*) {G V : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
/-- The trivial representation of `G` on a `k`-module V.
-/
def trivial : Representation k G V :=
1
#align representation.trivial Representation.trivial
-- Porting note: why is `V` implicit
theorem trivial_def (g : G) (v : V) : trivial k (V := V) g v = v :=
rfl
#align representation.trivial_def Representation.trivial_def
variable {k}
/-- A predicate for representations that fix every element. -/
class IsTrivial (ρ : Representation k G V) : Prop where
out : ∀ g x, ρ g x = x := by aesop
instance : IsTrivial (trivial k (G := G) (V := V)) where
@[simp] theorem apply_eq_self
(ρ : Representation k G V) (g : G) (x : V) [h : IsTrivial ρ] :
ρ g x = x := h.out g x
end trivial
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G V : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
variable (ρ : Representation k G V)
/-- A `k`-linear representation of `G` on `V` can be thought of as
an algebra map from `MonoidAlgebra k G` into the `k`-linear endomorphisms of `V`.
-/
noncomputable def asAlgebraHom : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] Module.End k V :=
(lift k G _) ρ
#align representation.as_algebra_hom Representation.asAlgebraHom
theorem asAlgebraHom_def : asAlgebraHom ρ = (lift k G _) ρ :=
rfl
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_def Representation.asAlgebraHom_def
@[simp]
theorem asAlgebraHom_single (g : G) (r : k) : asAlgebraHom ρ (Finsupp.single g r) = r • ρ g := by
simp only [asAlgebraHom_def, MonoidAlgebra.lift_single]
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_single Representation.asAlgebraHom_single
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Basic.lean | 110 | 110 | theorem asAlgebraHom_single_one (g : G) : asAlgebraHom ρ (Finsupp.single g 1) = ρ g := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
#align_import data.set.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file defines the product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i` along with the diagonal of a
type.
## Main declarations
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun _ => And.decidable
#align set.decidable_mem_prod Set.decidableMemProd
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
#align set.prod_mono Set.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align set.prod_mono_left Set.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align set.prod_mono_right Set.prod_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
#align set.prod_self_subset_prod_self Set.prod_self_subset_prod_self
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
#align set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self Set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
#align set.prod_subset_iff Set.prod_subset_iff
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
#align set.forall_prod_set Set.forall_prod_set
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
#align set.exists_prod_set Set.exists_prod_set
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact and_false_iff _
#align set.prod_empty Set.prod_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_prod Set.empty_prod
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact true_and_iff _
#align set.univ_prod_univ Set.univ_prod_univ
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.univ_prod Set.univ_prod
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.prod_univ Set.prod_univ
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.singleton_prod Set.singleton_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.prod_singleton Set.prod_singleton
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by simp
#align set.singleton_prod_singleton Set.singleton_prod_singleton
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
#align set.union_prod Set.union_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
#align set.prod_union Set.prod_union
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.inter_prod Set.inter_prod
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.prod_inter Set.prod_inter
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align set.prod_inter_prod Set.prod_inter_prod
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
#align set.disjoint_prod Set.disjoint_prod
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_left Set.Disjoint.set_prod_left
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_right Set.Disjoint.set_prod_right
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp]
#align set.insert_prod Set.insert_prod
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
-- porting note (#10745):
-- was `simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp, Imp.swap]`
simp only [mem_prod, mem_insert_iff, image, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.injEq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hx, rfl|hy⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, hy⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩|⟨hx, hy⟩ := h
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inl rfl⟩
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inr hy⟩
#align set.prod_insert Set.prod_insert
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_eq Set.prod_preimage_eq
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_left Set.prod_preimage_left
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_right Set.prod_preimage_right
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_prod_map_prod Set.preimage_prod_map_prod
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.mk_preimage_prod Set.mk_preimage_prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left Set.mk_preimage_prod_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right Set.mk_preimage_prod_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
#align set.preimage_swap_prod Set.preimage_swap_prod
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
#align set.image_swap_prod Set.image_swap_prod
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
#align set.prod_image_image_eq Set.prod_image_image_eq
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_range_eq Set.prod_range_range_eq
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prod_map {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
#align set.range_prod_map Set.range_prod_map
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_univ_eq Set.prod_range_univ_eq
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_univ_range_eq Set.prod_univ_range_eq
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prod_map]
apply range_comp_subset_range
#align set.range_pair_subset Set.range_pair_subset
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty.prod Set.Nonempty.prod
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
#align set.nonempty.fst Set.Nonempty.fst
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
#align set.nonempty.snd Set.Nonempty.snd
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
#align set.prod_nonempty_iff Set.prod_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
#align set.prod_eq_empty_iff Set.prod_eq_empty_iff
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.prod_sub_preimage_iff Set.prod_sub_preimage_iff
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right
theorem prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
inter_subset_left
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_fst Set.prod_subset_preimage_fst
theorem fst_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_fst s t
#align set.fst_image_prod_subset Set.fst_image_prod_subset
theorem fst_image_prod (s : Set β) {t : Set α} (ht : t.Nonempty) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t = s :=
(fst_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
⟨(y, x), ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.fst_image_prod Set.fst_image_prod
theorem prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
inter_subset_right
#align set.prod_subset_preimage_snd Set.prod_subset_preimage_snd
theorem snd_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s t
#align set.snd_image_prod_subset Set.snd_image_prod_subset
theorem snd_image_prod {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t = t :=
(snd_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y y_in =>
let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.snd_image_prod Set.snd_image_prod
theorem prod_diff_prod : s ×ˢ t \ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ = s ×ˢ (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁) ×ˢ t := by
ext x
by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁ <;> simp [*]
#align set.prod_diff_prod Set.prod_diff_prod
/-- A product set is included in a product set if and only factors are included, or a factor of the
first set is empty. -/
theorem prod_subset_prod_iff : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h
refine ⟨fun H => Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have := image_subset (Prod.fst : α × β → α) H
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ (h.mono H).snd] at this
· have := image_subset (Prod.snd : α × β → β) H
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod (h.mono H).fst] at this
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false_iff] at H
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2
#align set.prod_subset_prod_iff Set.prod_subset_prod_iff
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ := by
constructor
· intro heq
have h₁ : (s₁ ×ˢ t₁ : Set _).Nonempty := by rwa [← heq]
rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at h h₁
rw [← fst_image_prod s h.2, ← fst_image_prod s₁ h₁.2, heq, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff, ←
snd_image_prod h.1 t, ← snd_image_prod h₁.1 t₁, heq]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty Set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ ∨ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (s₁ = ∅ ∨ t₁ = ∅) := by
symm
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (s ×ˢ t) with h | h
· simp_rw [h, @eq_comm _ ∅, prod_eq_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h, true_and_iff,
or_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h
rw [prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h]
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, prod_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp_rw [h, false_and_iff, or_false_iff]
#align set.prod_eq_prod_iff Set.prod_eq_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_iff_eq (ht : t.Nonempty) : s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ↔ s = s₁ := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_iff, ht.ne_empty, and_true_iff, or_iff_left_iff_imp,
or_false_iff]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align set.prod_eq_iff_eq Set.prod_eq_iff_eq
section Mono
variable [Preorder α] {f : α → Set β} {g : α → Set γ}
theorem _root_.Monotone.set_prod (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
#align monotone.set_prod Monotone.set_prod
theorem _root_.Antitone.set_prod (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
#align antitone.set_prod Antitone.set_prod
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.set_prod (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
#align monotone_on.set_prod MonotoneOn.set_prod
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.set_prod (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
#align antitone_on.set_prod AntitoneOn.set_prod
end Mono
end Prod
/-! ### Diagonal
In this section we prove some lemmas about the diagonal set `{p | p.1 = p.2}` and the diagonal map
`fun x ↦ (x, x)`.
-/
section Diagonal
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α}
lemma diagonal_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (diagonal α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun x => ⟨_, mem_diagonal x⟩
#align set.diagonal_nonempty Set.diagonal_nonempty
instance decidableMemDiagonal [h : DecidableEq α] (x : α × α) : Decidable (x ∈ diagonal α) :=
h x.1 x.2
#align set.decidable_mem_diagonal Set.decidableMemDiagonal
theorem preimage_coe_coe_diagonal (s : Set α) :
Prod.map (fun x : s => (x : α)) (fun x : s => (x : α)) ⁻¹' diagonal α = diagonal s := by
ext ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
simp [Set.diagonal]
#align set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal Set.preimage_coe_coe_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem range_diag : (range fun x => (x, x)) = diagonal α := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [diagonal, eq_comm]
#align set.range_diag Set.range_diag
theorem diagonal_subset_iff {s} : diagonal α ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, (x, x) ∈ s := by
rw [← range_diag, range_subset_iff]
#align set.diagonal_subset_iff Set.diagonal_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint : s ×ˢ t ⊆ (diagonal α)ᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
prod_subset_iff.trans disjoint_iff_forall_ne.symm
#align set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint Set.prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint
@[simp]
theorem diag_preimage_prod (s t : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align set.diag_preimage_prod Set.diag_preimage_prod
theorem diag_preimage_prod_self (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s = s :=
inter_self s
#align set.diag_preimage_prod_self Set.diag_preimage_prod_self
theorem diag_image (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) '' s = diagonal α ∩ s ×ˢ s := by
rw [← range_diag, ← image_preimage_eq_range_inter, diag_preimage_prod_self]
#align set.diag_image Set.diag_image
theorem diagonal_eq_univ_iff : diagonal α = univ ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, eq_univ_iff_forall, Prod.forall, mem_diagonal_iff]
theorem diagonal_eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : diagonal α = univ := diagonal_eq_univ_iff.2 ‹_›
end Diagonal
/-- A function is `Function.const α a` for some `a` if and only if `∀ x y, f x = f y`. -/
theorem range_const_eq_diagonal {α β : Type*} [hβ : Nonempty β] :
range (const α) = {f : α → β | ∀ x y, f x = f y} := by
refine (range_eq_iff _ _).mpr ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl, fun f hf ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with h|⟨⟨a⟩⟩
· exact hβ.elim fun b ↦ ⟨b, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· exact ⟨f a, funext fun x ↦ hf _ _⟩
end Set
section Pullback
open Set
variable {X Y Z}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y Z$. -/
abbrev Function.Pullback (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) := {p : X × Z // f p.1 = g p.2}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y X$. -/
abbrev Function.PullbackSelf (f : X → Y) := f.Pullback f
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the first factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : X := p.val.1
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the second factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : Z := p.val.2
open Function.Pullback in
lemma Function.pullback_comm_sq (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) :
f ∘ @fst X Y Z f g = g ∘ @snd X Y Z f g := funext fun p ↦ p.2
/-- The diagonal map $\Delta: X \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (x : X) : f.Pullback f := ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
/-- The diagonal $\Delta(X) \subseteq X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.pullbackDiagonal (f : X → Y) : Set (f.Pullback f) := {p | p.fst = p.snd}
/-- Three functions between the three pairs of spaces $X_i, Y_i, Z_i$ that are compatible
induce a function $X_1 \times_{Y_1} Z_1 \to X_2 \times_{Y_2} Z_2$. -/
def Function.mapPullback {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂}
{f₁ : X₁ → Y₁} {g₁ : Z₁ → Y₁} {f₂ : X₂ → Y₂} {g₂ : Z₂ → Y₂}
(mapX : X₁ → X₂) (mapY : Y₁ → Y₂) (mapZ : Z₁ → Z₂)
(commX : f₂ ∘ mapX = mapY ∘ f₁) (commZ : g₂ ∘ mapZ = mapY ∘ g₁)
(p : f₁.Pullback g₁) : f₂.Pullback g₂ :=
⟨(mapX p.fst, mapZ p.snd),
(congr_fun commX _).trans <| (congr_arg mapY p.2).trans <| congr_fun commZ.symm _⟩
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_Z (X \times_Y Z) \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@snd X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → f.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback fst g fst (pullback_comm_sq f g) (pullback_comm_sq f g)
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_X (X \times_Y Z) \to Z \times_Y Z$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@fst X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → g.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback snd f snd (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm
open Function.PullbackSelf Function.Pullback
theorem preimage_map_fst_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
@map_fst X Y Z f g ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (@snd X Y Z f g) := by
ext ⟨⟨p₁, p₂⟩, he⟩
simp_rw [pullbackDiagonal, mem_setOf, Subtype.ext_iff, Prod.ext_iff]
exact (and_iff_left he).symm
theorem Function.Injective.preimage_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → X} (inj : g.Injective) :
mapPullback g id g (by rfl) (by rfl) ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (f ∘ g) :=
ext fun _ ↦ inj.eq_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 589 | 597 | theorem image_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (s : Set X) :
toPullbackDiag f '' s = pullbackDiagonal f ∩ Subtype.val ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s := by |
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, hx, hx⟩
· obtain ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := x
rintro ⟨rfl : x = y, h2x⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ h2x.1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.cofinality from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7c2ce0c2da15516b4e65d0c9e254bb6dc93abd1f"
/-!
# Cofinality
This file contains the definition of cofinality of an ordinal number and regular cardinals
## Main Definitions
* `Ordinal.cof o` is the cofinality of the ordinal `o`.
If `o` is the order type of the relation `<` on `α`, then `o.cof` is the smallest cardinality of a
subset `s` of α that is *cofinal* in `α`, i.e. `∀ x : α, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬ y < x`.
* `Cardinal.IsStrongLimit c` means that `c` is a strong limit cardinal:
`c ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x < c, 2 ^ x < c`.
* `Cardinal.IsRegular c` means that `c` is a regular cardinal: `ℵ₀ ≤ c ∧ c.ord.cof = c`.
* `Cardinal.IsInaccessible c` means that `c` is strongly inaccessible:
`ℵ₀ < c ∧ IsRegular c ∧ IsStrongLimit c`.
## Main Statements
* `Ordinal.infinite_pigeonhole_card`: the infinite pigeonhole principle
* `Cardinal.lt_power_cof`: A consequence of König's theorem stating that `c < c ^ c.ord.cof` for
`c ≥ ℵ₀`
* `Cardinal.univ_inaccessible`: The type of ordinals in `Type u` form an inaccessible cardinal
(in `Type v` with `v > u`). This shows (externally) that in `Type u` there are at least `u`
inaccessible cardinals.
## Implementation Notes
* The cofinality is defined for ordinals.
If `c` is a cardinal number, its cofinality is `c.ord.cof`.
## Tags
cofinality, regular cardinals, limits cardinals, inaccessible cardinals,
infinite pigeonhole principle
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop}
/-! ### Cofinality of orders -/
namespace Order
/-- Cofinality of a reflexive order `≼`. This is the smallest cardinality
of a subset `S : Set α` such that `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≼ b`. -/
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
#align order.cof Order.cof
/-- The set in the definition of `Order.cof` is nonempty. -/
theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
#align order.cof_nonempty Order.cof_nonempty
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
#align order.cof_le Order.cof_le
theorem le_cof {r : α → α → Prop} [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
#align order.le_cof Order.le_cof
end Order
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 90 | 102 | theorem RelIso.cof_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s} [IsRefl β s]
(f : r ≃r s) : Cardinal.lift.{max u v} (Order.cof r) ≤
Cardinal.lift.{max u v} (Order.cof s) := by |
rw [Order.cof, Order.cof, lift_sInf, lift_sInf,
le_csInf_iff'' ((Order.cof_nonempty s).image _)]
rintro - ⟨-, ⟨u, H, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
apply csInf_le'
refine
⟨_, ⟨f.symm '' u, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩,
lift_mk_eq.{u, v, max u v}.2 ⟨(f.symm.toEquiv.image u).symm⟩⟩
rcases H (f a) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
refine ⟨f.symm b, mem_image_of_mem _ hb, f.map_rel_iff.1 ?_⟩
rwa [RelIso.apply_symm_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Slope
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.ordered from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"78261225eb5cedc61c5c74ecb44e5b385d13b733"
/-!
# Ordered modules as affine spaces
In this file we prove some theorems about `slope` and `lineMap` in the case when the module `E`
acting on the codomain `PE` of a function is an ordered module over its domain `k`. We also prove
inequalities that can be used to link convexity of a function on an interval to monotonicity of the
slope, see section docstring below for details.
## Implementation notes
We do not introduce the notion of ordered affine spaces (yet?). Instead, we prove various theorems
for an ordered module interpreted as an affine space.
## Tags
affine space, ordered module, slope
-/
open AffineMap
variable {k E PE : Type*}
/-!
### Monotonicity of `lineMap`
In this section we prove that `lineMap a b r` is monotone (strictly or not) in its arguments if
other arguments belong to specific domains.
-/
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing k] [OrderedAddCommGroup E] [Module k E] [OrderedSMul k E]
variable {a a' b b' : E} {r r' : k}
theorem lineMap_mono_left (ha : a ≤ a') (hr : r ≤ 1) : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_le_add_right (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left ha (sub_nonneg.2 hr)) _
#align line_map_mono_left lineMap_mono_left
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_left (ha : a < a') (hr : r < 1) : lineMap a b r < lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_lt_add_right (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left ha (sub_pos.2 hr)) _
#align line_map_strict_mono_left lineMap_strict_mono_left
theorem lineMap_mono_right (hb : b ≤ b') (hr : 0 ≤ r) : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a b' r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_le_add_left (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb hr) _
#align line_map_mono_right lineMap_mono_right
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_right (hb : b < b') (hr : 0 < r) : lineMap a b r < lineMap a b' r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_lt_add_left (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb hr) _
#align line_map_strict_mono_right lineMap_strict_mono_right
theorem lineMap_mono_endpoints (ha : a ≤ a') (hb : b ≤ b') (h₀ : 0 ≤ r) (h₁ : r ≤ 1) :
lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a' b' r :=
(lineMap_mono_left ha h₁).trans (lineMap_mono_right hb h₀)
#align line_map_mono_endpoints lineMap_mono_endpoints
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_endpoints (ha : a < a') (hb : b < b') (h₀ : 0 ≤ r) (h₁ : r ≤ 1) :
lineMap a b r < lineMap a' b' r := by
rcases h₀.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h₀); · simpa
exact (lineMap_mono_left ha.le h₁).trans_lt (lineMap_strict_mono_right hb h₀)
#align line_map_strict_mono_endpoints lineMap_strict_mono_endpoints
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Ordered.lean | 83 | 86 | theorem lineMap_lt_lineMap_iff_of_lt (h : r < r') : lineMap a b r < lineMap a b r' ↔ a < b := by |
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
rw [← lt_sub_iff_add_lt, add_sub_assoc, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_smul, ← sub_smul,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left (sub_pos.2 h)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
#align simple_graph.edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
#align simple_graph.coe_edge_finset SimpleGraph.coe_edgeFinset
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align simple_graph.mem_edge_finset SimpleGraph.mem_edgeFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
#align simple_graph.not_is_diag_of_mem_edge_finset SimpleGraph.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_inj SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_inj
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_subset_edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_ssubset_edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_mono SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_strict_mono SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_strict_mono
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_bot SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_bot
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_sup SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_sup
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_inf SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_inf
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_sdiff SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_sdiff
theorem edgeFinset_card : G.edgeFinset.card = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_card SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : (univ : Finset G.edgeSet).card = G.edgeFinset.card :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_set_univ_card SimpleGraph.edgeSet_univ_card
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = univ.filter fun e => ¬e.IsDiag := by
rw [← coe_inj]; simp
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset.card = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
/-- Any graph on `n` vertices has at most `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_le_card_choose_two : G.edgeFinset.card ≤ (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
classical
rw [← card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two]
exact card_le_card (edgeFinset_mono le_top)
end EdgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_deleteEdges [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] (s : Finset (Sym2 V))
[Fintype (G.deleteEdges s).edgeSet] :
(G.deleteEdges s).edgeFinset = G.edgeFinset \ s := by
ext e
simp [edgeSet_deleteEdges]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_delete_edges SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_deleteEdges
section DeleteFar
-- Porting note: added `Fintype (Sym2 V)` argument.
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [OrderedRing 𝕜] [Fintype V] [Fintype (Sym2 V)]
[Fintype G.edgeSet] {p : SimpleGraph V → Prop} {r r₁ r₂ : 𝕜}
/-- A graph is `r`-*delete-far* from a property `p` if we must delete at least `r` edges from it to
get a graph with the property `p`. -/
def DeleteFar (p : SimpleGraph V → Prop) (r : 𝕜) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃s⦄, s ⊆ G.edgeFinset → p (G.deleteEdges s) → r ≤ s.card
#align simple_graph.delete_far SimpleGraph.DeleteFar
variable {G}
theorem deleteFar_iff :
G.DeleteFar p r ↔ ∀ ⦃H : SimpleGraph _⦄ [DecidableRel H.Adj],
H ≤ G → p H → r ≤ G.edgeFinset.card - H.edgeFinset.card := by
classical
refine ⟨fun h H _ hHG hH ↦ ?_, fun h s hs hG ↦ ?_⟩
· have := h (sdiff_subset (t := H.edgeFinset))
simp only [deleteEdges_sdiff_eq_of_le hHG, edgeFinset_mono hHG, card_sdiff,
card_le_card, coe_sdiff, coe_edgeFinset, Nat.cast_sub] at this
exact this hH
· classical
simpa [card_sdiff hs, edgeFinset_deleteEdges, -Set.toFinset_card, Nat.cast_sub,
card_le_card hs] using h (G.deleteEdges_le s) hG
#align simple_graph.delete_far_iff SimpleGraph.deleteFar_iff
alias ⟨DeleteFar.le_card_sub_card, _⟩ := deleteFar_iff
#align simple_graph.delete_far.le_card_sub_card SimpleGraph.DeleteFar.le_card_sub_card
theorem DeleteFar.mono (h : G.DeleteFar p r₂) (hr : r₁ ≤ r₂) : G.DeleteFar p r₁ := fun _ hs hG =>
hr.trans <| h hs hG
#align simple_graph.delete_far.mono SimpleGraph.DeleteFar.mono
end DeleteFar
section FiniteAt
/-!
## Finiteness at a vertex
This section contains definitions and lemmas concerning vertices that
have finitely many adjacent vertices. We denote this condition by
`Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
We define `G.neighborFinset v` to be the `Finset` version of `G.neighborSet v`.
Use `neighborFinset_eq_filter` to rewrite this definition as a `Finset.filter` expression.
-/
variable (v) [Fintype (G.neighborSet v)]
/-- `G.neighbors v` is the `Finset` version of `G.Adj v` in case `G` is
locally finite at `v`. -/
def neighborFinset : Finset V :=
(G.neighborSet v).toFinset
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset SimpleGraph.neighborFinset
theorem neighborFinset_def : G.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborSet v).toFinset :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_def SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborFinset (w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborFinset v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align simple_graph.mem_neighbor_finset SimpleGraph.mem_neighborFinset
theorem not_mem_neighborFinset_self : v ∉ G.neighborFinset v := by simp
#align simple_graph.not_mem_neighbor_finset_self SimpleGraph.not_mem_neighborFinset_self
theorem neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton : Disjoint (G.neighborFinset v) {v} :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_disjoint_singleton SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton
theorem singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset : Disjoint {v} (G.neighborFinset v) :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
#align simple_graph.singleton_disjoint_neighbor_finset SimpleGraph.singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset
/-- `G.degree v` is the number of vertices adjacent to `v`. -/
def degree : ℕ :=
(G.neighborFinset v).card
#align simple_graph.degree SimpleGraph.degree
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 we could do `simp [← degree]`, but that gives
-- "invalid '←' modifier, 'SimpleGraph.degree' is a declaration name to be unfolded".
-- In any case, having this lemma is good since there's no guarantee we won't still change
-- the definition of `degree`.
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborFinset_eq_degree : (G.neighborFinset v).card = G.degree v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborSet_eq_degree : Fintype.card (G.neighborSet v) = G.degree v :=
(Set.toFinset_card _).symm
#align simple_graph.card_neighbor_set_eq_degree SimpleGraph.card_neighborSet_eq_degree
theorem degree_pos_iff_exists_adj : 0 < G.degree v ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w := by
simp only [degree, card_pos, Finset.Nonempty, mem_neighborFinset]
#align simple_graph.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj SimpleGraph.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj
theorem degree_compl [Fintype (Gᶜ.neighborSet v)] [Fintype V] :
Gᶜ.degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 - G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet G v, Set.toFinset_union]
simp [card_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_toFinset.mpr (compl_neighborSet_disjoint G v))]
#align simple_graph.degree_compl SimpleGraph.degree_compl
instance incidenceSetFintype [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (G.incidenceSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (G.neighborSet v) (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v).symm
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_fintype SimpleGraph.incidenceSetFintype
/-- This is the `Finset` version of `incidenceSet`. -/
def incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
(G.incidenceSet v).toFinset
#align simple_graph.incidence_finset SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceSet_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
Fintype.card (G.incidenceSet v) = G.degree v := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v)]
simp
#align simple_graph.card_incidence_set_eq_degree SimpleGraph.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
(G.incidenceFinset v).card = G.degree v := by
rw [← G.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree]
apply Set.toFinset_card
#align simple_graph.card_incidence_finset_eq_degree SimpleGraph.card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) :
e ∈ G.incidenceFinset v ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet v :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align simple_graph.mem_incidence_finset SimpleGraph.mem_incidenceFinset
theorem incidenceFinset_eq_filter [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] :
G.incidenceFinset v = G.edgeFinset.filter (Membership.mem v) := by
ext e
refine Sym2.ind (fun x y => ?_) e
simp [mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff]
#align simple_graph.incidence_finset_eq_filter SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset_eq_filter
end FiniteAt
section LocallyFinite
/-- A graph is locally finite if every vertex has a finite neighbor set. -/
abbrev LocallyFinite :=
∀ v : V, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)
#align simple_graph.locally_finite SimpleGraph.LocallyFinite
variable [LocallyFinite G]
/-- A locally finite simple graph is regular of degree `d` if every vertex has degree `d`. -/
def IsRegularOfDegree (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, G.degree v = d
#align simple_graph.is_regular_of_degree SimpleGraph.IsRegularOfDegree
variable {G}
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq {d : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) (v : V) : G.degree v = d :=
h v
#align simple_graph.is_regular_of_degree.degree_eq SimpleGraph.IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.compl [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{k : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree k) : Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1 - k) := by
intro v
rw [degree_compl, h v]
#align simple_graph.is_regular_of_degree.compl SimpleGraph.IsRegularOfDegree.compl
end LocallyFinite
section Finite
variable [Fintype V]
instance neighborSetFintype [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : Fintype (G.neighborSet v) :=
@Subtype.fintype _ _
(by
simp_rw [mem_neighborSet]
infer_instance)
_
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set_fintype SimpleGraph.neighborSetFintype
theorem neighborFinset_eq_filter {v : V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
G.neighborFinset v = Finset.univ.filter (G.Adj v) := by
ext
simp
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_eq_filter SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_eq_filter
theorem neighborFinset_compl [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
Gᶜ.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} := by
simp only [neighborFinset, neighborSet_compl, Set.toFinset_diff, Set.toFinset_compl,
Set.toFinset_singleton]
#align simple_graph.neighbor_finset_compl SimpleGraph.neighborFinset_compl
@[simp]
theorem complete_graph_degree [DecidableEq V] (v : V) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 := by
erw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, filter_ne, card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ v), card_univ]
#align simple_graph.complete_graph_degree SimpleGraph.complete_graph_degree
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 346 | 348 | theorem bot_degree (v : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = 0 := by |
erw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, filter_False]
exact Finset.card_empty
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.OpenPos
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.prod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"00abe0695d8767201e6d008afa22393978bb324d"
/-!
# The product measure
In this file we define and prove properties about the binary product measure. If `α` and `β` have
s-finite measures `μ` resp. `ν` then `α × β` can be equipped with a s-finite measure `μ.prod ν` that
satisfies `(μ.prod ν) s = ∫⁻ x, ν {y | (x, y) ∈ s} ∂μ`.
We also have `(μ.prod ν) (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t`, i.e. the measure of a rectangle is the product of
the measures of the sides.
We also prove Tonelli's theorem.
## Main definition
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod`: The product of two measures.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_apply` states `μ.prod ν s = ∫⁻ x, ν {y | (x, y) ∈ s} ∂μ`
for measurable `s`. `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_apply_symm` is the reversed version.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_prod` states `μ.prod ν (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t` for measurable sets
`s` and `t`.
* `MeasureTheory.lintegral_prod`: Tonelli's theorem. It states that for a measurable function
`α × β → ℝ≥0∞` we have `∫⁻ z, f z ∂(μ.prod ν) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ`. The version
for functions `α → β → ℝ≥0∞` is reversed, and called `lintegral_lintegral`. Both versions have
a variant with `_symm` appended, where the order of integration is reversed.
The lemma `Measurable.lintegral_prod_right'` states that the inner integral of the right-hand side
is measurable.
## Implementation Notes
Many results are proven twice, once for functions in curried form (`α → β → γ`) and one for
functions in uncurried form (`α × β → γ`). The former often has an assumption
`Measurable (uncurry f)`, which could be inconvenient to discharge, but for the latter it is more
common that the function has to be given explicitly, since Lean cannot synthesize the function by
itself. We name the lemmas about the uncurried form with a prime.
Tonelli's theorem has a different naming scheme, since the version for the uncurried version is
reversed.
## Tags
product measure, Tonelli's theorem, Fubini-Tonelli theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open TopologicalSpace hiding generateFrom
open Filter hiding prod_eq map
variable {α α' β β' γ E : Type*}
/-- Rectangles formed by π-systems form a π-system. -/
theorem IsPiSystem.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsPiSystem C)
(hD : IsPiSystem D) : IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [prod_inter_prod] at hst ⊢; rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hC _ hs₁ _ hs₂ hst.1) (hD _ ht₁ _ ht₂ hst.2)
#align is_pi_system.prod IsPiSystem.prod
/-- Rectangles of countably spanning sets are countably spanning. -/
theorem IsCountablySpanning.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) : IsCountablySpanning (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rcases hC, hD with ⟨⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩, t, h1t, h2t⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n.unpair.1 ×ˢ t n.unpair.2, fun n => mem_image2_of_mem (h1s _) (h1t _), ?_⟩
rw [iUnion_unpair_prod, h2s, h2t, univ_prod_univ]
#align is_countably_spanning.prod IsCountablySpanning.prod
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α'] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β']
variable [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ' : Measure α} {ν ν' : Measure β} {τ : Measure γ}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-! ### Measurability
Before we define the product measure, we can talk about the measurability of operations on binary
functions. We show that if `f` is a binary measurable function, then the function that integrates
along one of the variables (using either the Lebesgue or Bochner integral) is measurable.
-/
/-- The product of generated σ-algebras is the one generated by rectangles, if both generating sets
are countably spanning. -/
theorem generateFrom_prod_eq {α β} {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) :
@Prod.instMeasurableSpace _ _ (generateFrom C) (generateFrom D) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine sup_le ?_ ?_ <;> rw [comap_generateFrom] <;> apply generateFrom_le <;>
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
· rcases hD with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← prod_univ, ← h2t, prod_iUnion]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
intro n
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
exact ⟨s, hs, t n, h1t n, rfl⟩
· rcases hC with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← univ_prod, ← h2t, iUnion_prod_const]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
rintro n
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
exact mem_image2_of_mem (h1t n) hs
· apply generateFrom_le
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
dsimp only
rw [prod_eq]
apply (measurable_fst _).inter (measurable_snd _)
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom ht
#align generate_from_prod_eq generateFrom_prod_eq
/-- If `C` and `D` generate the σ-algebras on `α` resp. `β`, then rectangles formed by `C` and `D`
generate the σ-algebra on `α × β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_eq_prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : generateFrom C = ‹_›)
(hD : generateFrom D = ‹_›) (h2C : IsCountablySpanning C) (h2D : IsCountablySpanning D) :
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) = Prod.instMeasurableSpace := by
rw [← hC, ← hD, generateFrom_prod_eq h2C h2D]
#align generate_from_eq_prod generateFrom_eq_prod
/-- The product σ-algebra is generated from boxes, i.e. `s ×ˢ t` for sets `s : Set α` and
`t : Set β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_prod :
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } { t : Set β | MeasurableSet t }) =
Prod.instMeasurableSpace :=
generateFrom_eq_prod generateFrom_measurableSet generateFrom_measurableSet
isCountablySpanning_measurableSet isCountablySpanning_measurableSet
#align generate_from_prod generateFrom_prod
/-- Rectangles form a π-system. -/
theorem isPiSystem_prod :
IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } { t : Set β | MeasurableSet t }) :=
isPiSystem_measurableSet.prod isPiSystem_measurableSet
#align is_pi_system_prod isPiSystem_prod
/-- If `ν` is a finite measure, and `s ⊆ α × β` is measurable, then `x ↦ ν { y | (x, y) ∈ s }` is
a measurable function. `measurable_measure_prod_mk_left` is strictly more general. -/
theorem measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite [IsFiniteMeasure ν] {s : Set (α × β)}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) := by
refine induction_on_inter (C := fun s => Measurable fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s))
generateFrom_prod.symm isPiSystem_prod ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hs
· simp
· rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, _, rfl⟩
simp only [mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, measure_if]
exact measurable_const.indicator hs
· intro t ht h2t
simp_rw [preimage_compl, measure_compl (measurable_prod_mk_left ht) (measure_ne_top ν _)]
exact h2t.const_sub _
· intro f h1f h2f h3f
simp_rw [preimage_iUnion]
have : ∀ b, ν (⋃ i, Prod.mk b ⁻¹' f i) = ∑' i, ν (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' f i) := fun b =>
measure_iUnion (fun i j hij => Disjoint.preimage _ (h1f hij)) fun i =>
measurable_prod_mk_left (h2f i)
simp_rw [this]
apply Measurable.ennreal_tsum h3f
#align measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite
/-- If `ν` is an s-finite measure, and `s ⊆ α × β` is measurable, then `x ↦ ν { y | (x, y) ∈ s }`
is a measurable function. -/
theorem measurable_measure_prod_mk_left [SFinite ν] {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq ν]
simp_rw [Measure.sum_apply_of_countable]
exact Measurable.ennreal_tsum (fun i ↦ measurable_measure_prod_mk_left_finite hs)
#align measurable_measure_prod_mk_left measurable_measure_prod_mk_left
/-- If `μ` is a σ-finite measure, and `s ⊆ α × β` is measurable, then `y ↦ μ { x | (x, y) ∈ s }` is
a measurable function. -/
theorem measurable_measure_prod_mk_right {μ : Measure α} [SFinite μ] {s : Set (α × β)}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun y => μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' s) :=
measurable_measure_prod_mk_left (measurableSet_swap_iff.mpr hs)
#align measurable_measure_prod_mk_right measurable_measure_prod_mk_right
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Prod/Basic.lean | 191 | 195 | theorem Measurable.map_prod_mk_left [SFinite ν] :
Measurable fun x : α => map (Prod.mk x) ν := by |
apply measurable_of_measurable_coe; intro s hs
simp_rw [map_apply measurable_prod_mk_left hs]
exact measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
[`data.finset.sym`@`98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90`..`02ba8949f486ebecf93fe7460f1ed0564b5e442c`](https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib-port-status/file/data/finset/sym?range=98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90..02ba8949f486ebecf93fe7460f1ed0564b5e442c)
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Vector
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sym
#align_import data.finset.sym from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"02ba8949f486ebecf93fe7460f1ed0564b5e442c"
/-!
# Symmetric powers of a finset
This file defines the symmetric powers of a finset as `Finset (Sym α n)` and `Finset (Sym2 α)`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sym`: The symmetric power of a finset. `s.sym n` is all the multisets of cardinality `n`
whose elements are in `s`.
* `Finset.sym2`: The symmetric square of a finset. `s.sym2` is all the pairs whose elements are in
`s`.
* A `Fintype (Sym2 α)` instance that does not require `DecidableEq α`.
## TODO
`Finset.sym` forms a Galois connection between `Finset α` and `Finset (Sym α n)`. Similar for
`Finset.sym2`.
-/
namespace Finset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- `s.sym2` is the finset of all unordered pairs of elements from `s`.
It is the image of `s ×ˢ s` under the quotient `α × α → Sym2 α`. -/
@[simps]
protected def sym2 (s : Finset α) : Finset (Sym2 α) := ⟨s.1.sym2, s.2.sym2⟩
#align finset.sym2 Finset.sym2
section
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem mk_mem_sym2_iff : s(a, b) ∈ s.sym2 ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_mk, sym2_val, Multiset.mk_mem_sym2_iff, mem_mk, mem_mk]
#align finset.mk_mem_sym2_iff Finset.mk_mem_sym2_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sym2_iff {m : Sym2 α} : m ∈ s.sym2 ↔ ∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s := by
rw [mem_mk, sym2_val, Multiset.mem_sym2_iff]
simp only [mem_val]
#align finset.mem_sym2_iff Finset.mem_sym2_iff
instance _root_.Sym2.instFintype [Fintype α] : Fintype (Sym2 α) where
elems := Finset.univ.sym2
complete := fun x ↦ by rw [mem_sym2_iff]; exact (fun a _ ↦ mem_univ a)
-- Note(kmill): Using a default argument to make this simp lemma more general.
@[simp]
theorem sym2_univ [Fintype α] (inst : Fintype (Sym2 α) := Sym2.instFintype) :
(univ : Finset α).sym2 = univ := by
ext
simp only [mem_sym2_iff, mem_univ, implies_true]
#align finset.sym2_univ Finset.sym2_univ
@[simp, mono]
theorem sym2_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : s.sym2 ⊆ t.sym2 := by
rw [← val_le_iff, sym2_val, sym2_val]
apply Multiset.sym2_mono
rwa [val_le_iff]
#align finset.sym2_mono Finset.sym2_mono
theorem monotone_sym2 : Monotone (Finset.sym2 : Finset α → _) := fun _ _ => sym2_mono
theorem injective_sym2 : Function.Injective (Finset.sym2 : Finset α → _) := by
intro s t h
ext x
simpa using congr(s(x, x) ∈ $h)
theorem strictMono_sym2 : StrictMono (Finset.sym2 : Finset α → _) :=
monotone_sym2.strictMono_of_injective injective_sym2
theorem sym2_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) :
m.toFinset.sym2 = m.sym2.toFinset := by
ext z
refine z.ind fun x y ↦ ?_
simp only [mk_mem_sym2_iff, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Multiset.mk_mem_sym2_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sym2_empty : (∅ : Finset α).sym2 = ∅ := rfl
#align finset.sym2_empty Finset.sym2_empty
@[simp]
theorem sym2_eq_empty : s.sym2 = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← val_eq_zero, sym2_val, Multiset.sym2_eq_zero_iff, val_eq_zero]
#align finset.sym2_eq_empty Finset.sym2_eq_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem sym2_nonempty : s.sym2.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp_rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, sym2_eq_empty]
#align finset.sym2_nonempty Finset.sym2_nonempty
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.sym2⟩ := sym2_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.sym2 Finset.Nonempty.sym2
@[simp]
theorem sym2_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).sym2 = {Sym2.diag a} := rfl
#align finset.sym2_singleton Finset.sym2_singleton
/-- Finset **stars and bars** for the case `n = 2`. -/
theorem card_sym2 (s : Finset α) : s.sym2.card = Nat.choose (s.card + 1) 2 := by
rw [card_def, sym2_val, Multiset.card_sym2, ← card_def]
#align finset.card_sym2 Finset.card_sym2
end
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem sym2_eq_image : s.sym2 = (s ×ˢ s).image Sym2.mk := by
ext z
refine z.ind fun x y ↦ ?_
rw [mk_mem_sym2_iff, mem_image]
constructor
· intro h
use (x, y)
simp only [mem_product, h, and_self, true_and]
· rintro ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩
simp only [mem_product, Sym2.eq_iff] at h
obtain ⟨h, (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)⟩ := h
<;> simp [h]
theorem isDiag_mk_of_mem_diag {a : α × α} (h : a ∈ s.diag) : (Sym2.mk a).IsDiag :=
(Sym2.isDiag_iff_proj_eq _).2 (mem_diag.1 h).2
#align finset.is_diag_mk_of_mem_diag Finset.isDiag_mk_of_mem_diag
theorem not_isDiag_mk_of_mem_offDiag {a : α × α} (h : a ∈ s.offDiag) :
¬ (Sym2.mk a).IsDiag := by
rw [Sym2.isDiag_iff_proj_eq]
exact (mem_offDiag.1 h).2.2
#align finset.not_is_diag_mk_of_mem_off_diag Finset.not_isDiag_mk_of_mem_offDiag
section Sym2
variable {m : Sym2 α}
-- Porting note: add this lemma and remove simp in the next lemma since simpNF lint
-- warns that its LHS is not in normal form
@[simp]
theorem diag_mem_sym2_mem_iff : (∀ b, b ∈ Sym2.diag a → b ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_sym2_iff]
exact mk_mem_sym2_iff.trans <| and_self_iff
theorem diag_mem_sym2_iff : Sym2.diag a ∈ s.sym2 ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [diag_mem_sym2_mem_iff]
#align finset.diag_mem_sym2_iff Finset.diag_mem_sym2_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sym.lean | 159 | 161 | theorem image_diag_union_image_offDiag :
s.diag.image Sym2.mk ∪ s.offDiag.image Sym2.mk = s.sym2 := by |
rw [← image_union, diag_union_offDiag, sym2_eq_image]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_cons Stream'.WSeq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : WSeq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_think Stream'.WSeq.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem dropn_nil (n) : drop (nil : WSeq α) n = nil := by induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_nil Stream'.WSeq.dropn_nil
@[simp]
theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) : drop (cons a s) (n + 1) = drop s n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [drop]
| succ n n_ih =>
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [*, drop]`.
simp [drop, ← n_ih]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_cons Stream'.WSeq.dropn_cons
@[simp]
theorem dropn_think (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by
induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_think Stream'.WSeq.dropn_think
theorem dropn_add (s : WSeq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => congr_arg tail (dropn_add s m n)
#align stream.wseq.dropn_add Stream'.WSeq.dropn_add
theorem dropn_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
symm
apply dropn_add
#align stream.wseq.dropn_tail Stream'.WSeq.dropn_tail
theorem get?_add (s : WSeq α) (m n) : get? s (m + n) = get? (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_add Stream'.WSeq.get?_add
theorem get?_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_tail Stream'.WSeq.get?_tail
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : WSeq α) :=
Seq.join_nil
#align stream.wseq.join_nil Stream'.WSeq.join_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_think (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : join (think S) = think (join S) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, Seq1.ret]
#align stream.wseq.join_think Stream'.WSeq.join_think
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s : WSeq α) (S) : join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, cons, append]
#align stream.wseq.join_cons Stream'.WSeq.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : WSeq α) : append nil s = s :=
Seq.nil_append _
#align stream.wseq.nil_append Stream'.WSeq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.cons_append Stream'.WSeq.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem think_append (s t : WSeq α) : append (think s) t = think (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.think_append Stream'.WSeq.think_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : WSeq α) : append s nil = s :=
Seq.append_nil _
#align stream.wseq.append_nil Stream'.WSeq.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : WSeq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) :=
Seq.append_assoc _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.append_assoc Stream'.WSeq.append_assoc
/-- auxiliary definition of tail over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def tail.aux : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (_, s) => destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail.aux Stream'.WSeq.tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : WSeq α) : destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux := by
simp only [tail, destruct_flatten, tail.aux]; rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
apply congr_arg; ext1 (_ | ⟨a, s⟩) <;> apply (@pure_bind Computation _ _ _ _ _ _).trans _ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.destruct_tail Stream'.WSeq.destruct_tail
/-- auxiliary definition of drop over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def drop.aux : ℕ → Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| 0 => Computation.pure
| n + 1 => fun a => tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux
theorem drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = Computation.pure none
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
show Computation.bind (Computation.pure none) (drop.aux n) = Computation.pure none by
rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none n]
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux_none Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux_none
theorem destruct_dropn : ∀ (s : WSeq α) (n), destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s, 0 => (bind_pure' _).symm
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [← dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_dropn Stream'.WSeq.destruct_dropn
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : WSeq α) [T : Terminates (head (tail s))] :
Terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 <| by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
simp? [tail] at h says simp only [tail, destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨s', h1, _⟩
unfold Functor.map at h1
exact
let ⟨t, h3, _⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h1
Computation.terminates_of_mem h3
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s := by
unfold tail Functor.map at h; simp only [destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨t, tm, td⟩; clear h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map tm with ⟨t', ht', ht2⟩; clear tm
cases' t' with t' <;> rw [← ht2] at td <;> simp only [destruct_nil] at td
· have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _)
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, ht'⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
unfold head at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, md, e⟩; clear h
cases' o with o <;> [injection e; injection e with h']; clear h'
cases' destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am
exact ⟨_, Computation.mem_map (@Prod.fst α (WSeq α) <$> ·) am⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_head_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_head_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_get?_some {s : WSeq α} {a n} (h : some a ∈ get? s n) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => exact ⟨_, h⟩
| succ n IH =>
let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h
exact IH h'
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_nth_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_get?_some
instance productive_tail (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Productive (tail s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_tail]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_tail Stream'.WSeq.productive_tail
instance productive_dropn (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] (n) : Productive (drop s n) :=
⟨fun m => by rw [← get?_add]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_dropn Stream'.WSeq.productive_dropn
/-- Given a productive weak sequence, we can collapse all the `think`s to
produce a sequence. -/
def toSeq (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Seq α :=
⟨fun n => (get? s n).get,
fun {n} h => by
cases e : Computation.get (get? s (n + 1))
· assumption
have := Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ e
simp? [get?] at this h says simp only [get?] at this h
cases' head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h'
have := mem_unique h' (@Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h)
contradiction⟩
#align stream.wseq.to_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq
theorem get?_terminates_le {s : WSeq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (get? s m) := by
induction' h with m' _ IH
exacts [id, fun T => IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates_le Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates_le
theorem head_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (head s) :=
get?_terminates_le (Nat.zero_le n)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} (T : Terminates (get? s n)) :
Terminates (destruct s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).1 <| head_terminates_of_get?_terminates T
#align stream.wseq.destruct_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem mem_rec_on {C : WSeq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s'))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
apply Seq.mem_rec_on M
intro o s' h; cases' o with b
· apply h2
cases h
· contradiction
· assumption
· apply h1
apply Or.imp_left _ h
intro h
injection h
#align stream.wseq.mem_rec_on Stream'.WSeq.mem_rec_on
@[simp]
theorem mem_think (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ think s ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases' s with f al
change (some (some a) ∈ some none::f) ↔ some (some a) ∈ f
constructor <;> intro h
· apply (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).resolve_left
intro
injections
· apply Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ h
#align stream.wseq.mem_think Stream'.WSeq.mem_think
theorem eq_or_mem_iff_mem {s : WSeq α} {a a' s'} :
some (a', s') ∈ destruct s → (a ∈ s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s') := by
generalize e : destruct s = c; intro h
revert s
apply Computation.memRecOn h <;> [skip; intro c IH] <;> intro s <;>
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
intro m <;>
have := congr_arg Computation.destruct m <;>
simp at this
· cases' this with i1 i2
rw [i1, i2]
cases' s' with f al
dsimp only [cons, (· ∈ ·), WSeq.Mem, Seq.Mem, Seq.cons]
have h_a_eq_a' : a = a' ↔ some (some a) = some (some a') := by simp
rw [h_a_eq_a']
refine ⟨Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, fun o => ?_⟩
· cases' o with e m
· rw [e]
apply Stream'.mem_cons
· exact Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· simp [IH this]
#align stream.wseq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem Stream'.WSeq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff (s : WSeq α) (b) {a} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
eq_or_mem_iff_mem <| by simp [ret_mem]
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_iff Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_iff
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {s : WSeq α} (b) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inr h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem mem_cons (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ cons a s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_tail {s : WSeq α} {a} : a ∈ tail s → a ∈ s := by
intro h; have := h; cases' h with n e; revert s; simp only [Stream'.get]
induction' n with n IH <;> intro s <;> induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
simp <;> intro m e <;>
injections
· exact Or.inr m
· exact Or.inr m
· apply IH m
rw [e]
cases tail s
rfl
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_tail Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_tail
theorem mem_of_mem_dropn {s : WSeq α} {a} : ∀ {n}, a ∈ drop s n → a ∈ s
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => @mem_of_mem_dropn s a n (mem_of_mem_tail h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_dropn Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_dropn
theorem get?_mem {s : WSeq α} {a n} : some a ∈ get? s n → a ∈ s := by
revert s; induction' n with n IH <;> intro s h
· -- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, h1, h2⟩
cases' o with o
· injection h2
injection h2 with h'
cases' o with a' s'
exact (eq_or_mem_iff_mem h1).2 (Or.inl h'.symm)
· have := @IH (tail s)
rw [get?_tail] at this
exact mem_of_mem_tail (this h)
#align stream.wseq.nth_mem Stream'.WSeq.get?_mem
theorem exists_get?_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, some a ∈ get? s n := by
apply mem_rec_on h
· intro a' s' h
cases' h with h h
· exists 0
simp only [get?, drop, head_cons]
rw [h]
apply ret_mem
· cases' h with n h
exists n + 1
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [get?]`.
simpa [get?]
· intro s' h
cases' h with n h
exists n
simp only [get?, dropn_think, head_think]
apply think_mem h
#align stream.wseq.exists_nth_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_get?_of_mem
theorem exists_dropn_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ n s', some (a, s') ∈ destruct (drop s n) :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
⟨n, by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ with ⟨⟨o, om⟩⟩
have := Computation.mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ om) h
cases' o with o
· injection this
injection this with i
cases' o with a' s'
dsimp at i
rw [i] at om
exact ⟨_, om⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_dropn_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_dropn_of_mem
theorem liftRel_dropn_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) :
∀ n, Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct (drop s n)) (destruct (drop t n))
| 0 => liftRel_destruct H
| n + 1 => by
simp only [LiftRelO, drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, destruct_tail, tail.aux]
apply liftRel_bind
· apply liftRel_dropn_destruct H n
exact fun {a b} o =>
match a, b, o with
| none, none, _ => by
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨_, h2⟩ => by simpa [tail.aux] using liftRel_destruct h2
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_dropn_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_dropn_destruct
theorem exists_of_liftRel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ R a b := by
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
-- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
let ⟨some (_, s'), sd, rfl⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h
let ⟨some (b, t'), td, ⟨ab, _⟩⟩ := (liftRel_dropn_destruct H n).left sd
exact ⟨b, get?_mem (Computation.mem_map (Prod.fst.{v, v} <$> ·) td), ab⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_left Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_left
theorem exists_of_liftRel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {b} (h : b ∈ t) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ R a b := by rw [← LiftRel.swap] at H; exact exists_of_liftRel_left H h
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_right Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_right
theorem head_terminates_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates (head s) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
head_terminates_of_get?_terminates ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_mem
theorem of_mem_append {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ append s₁ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ :=
Seq.of_mem_append
#align stream.wseq.of_mem_append Stream'.WSeq.of_mem_append
theorem mem_append_left {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ append s₁ s₂ :=
Seq.mem_append_left
#align stream.wseq.mem_append_left Stream'.WSeq.mem_append_left
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} : ∀ {s : WSeq α}, b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b
| ⟨g, al⟩, h => by
let ⟨o, om, oe⟩ := Seq.exists_of_mem_map h
cases' o with a
· injection oe
injection oe with h'
exact ⟨a, om, h'⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_map Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_nil (R : α → β → Prop) : LiftRel R nil nil := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_nil Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_nil
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_cons (R : α → β → Prop) (a b s t) :
LiftRel R (cons a s) (cons b t) ↔ R a b ∧ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_cons Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_cons
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,106 | 1,107 | theorem liftRel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R (think s) t ↔ LiftRel R s t := by |
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Inductions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Vieta
#align_import topology.algebra.polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"565eb991e264d0db702722b4bde52ee5173c9950"
/-!
# Polynomials and limits
In this file we prove the following lemmas.
* `Polynomial.continuous_eval₂`: `Polynomial.eval₂` defines a continuous function.
* `Polynomial.continuous_aeval`: `Polynomial.aeval` defines a continuous function;
we also prove convenience lemmas `Polynomial.continuousAt_aeval`,
`Polynomial.continuousWithinAt_aeval`, `Polynomial.continuousOn_aeval`.
* `Polynomial.continuous`: `Polynomial.eval` defines a continuous functions;
we also prove convenience lemmas `Polynomial.continuousAt`, `Polynomial.continuousWithinAt`,
`Polynomial.continuousOn`.
* `Polynomial.tendsto_norm_atTop`: `fun x ↦ ‖Polynomial.eval (z x) p‖` tends to infinity provided
that `fun x ↦ ‖z x‖` tends to infinity and `0 < degree p`;
* `Polynomial.tendsto_abv_eval₂_atTop`, `Polynomial.tendsto_abv_atTop`,
`Polynomial.tendsto_abv_aeval_atTop`: a few versions of the previous statement for
`IsAbsoluteValue abv` instead of norm.
## Tags
Polynomial, continuity
-/
open IsAbsoluteValue Filter
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial
section TopologicalSemiring
variable {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSemiring R] (p : R[X])
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected theorem continuous_eval₂ [Semiring S] (p : S[X]) (f : S →+* R) :
Continuous fun x => p.eval₂ f x := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, Finsupp.sum]
exact continuous_finset_sum _ fun c _ => continuous_const.mul (continuous_pow _)
#align polynomial.continuous_eval₂ Polynomial.continuous_eval₂
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous fun x => p.eval x :=
p.continuous_eval₂ _
#align polynomial.continuous Polynomial.continuous
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem continuousAt {a : R} : ContinuousAt (fun x => p.eval x) a :=
p.continuous.continuousAt
#align polynomial.continuous_at Polynomial.continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s a} : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => p.eval x) s a :=
p.continuous.continuousWithinAt
#align polynomial.continuous_within_at Polynomial.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem continuousOn {s} : ContinuousOn (fun x => p.eval x) s :=
p.continuous.continuousOn
#align polynomial.continuous_on Polynomial.continuousOn
end TopologicalSemiring
section TopologicalAlgebra
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[TopologicalSemiring A] (p : R[X])
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected theorem continuous_aeval : Continuous fun x : A => aeval x p :=
p.continuous_eval₂ _
#align polynomial.continuous_aeval Polynomial.continuous_aeval
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem continuousAt_aeval {a : A} : ContinuousAt (fun x : A => aeval x p) a :=
p.continuous_aeval.continuousAt
#align polynomial.continuous_at_aeval Polynomial.continuousAt_aeval
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem continuousWithinAt_aeval {s a} :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x : A => aeval x p) s a :=
p.continuous_aeval.continuousWithinAt
#align polynomial.continuous_within_at_aeval Polynomial.continuousWithinAt_aeval
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem continuousOn_aeval {s} : ContinuousOn (fun x : A => aeval x p) s :=
p.continuous_aeval.continuousOn
#align polynomial.continuous_on_aeval Polynomial.continuousOn_aeval
end TopologicalAlgebra
theorem tendsto_abv_eval₂_atTop {R S k α : Type*} [Semiring R] [Ring S] [LinearOrderedField k]
(f : R →+* S) (abv : S → k) [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (p : R[X]) (hd : 0 < degree p)
(hf : f p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) {l : Filter α} {z : α → S} (hz : Tendsto (abv ∘ z) l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun x => abv (p.eval₂ f (z x))) l atTop := by
revert hf; refine degree_pos_induction_on p hd ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> clear hd p
· rintro _ - hc
rw [leadingCoeff_mul_X, leadingCoeff_C] at hc
simpa [abv_mul abv] using hz.const_mul_atTop ((abv_pos abv).2 hc)
· intro _ _ ihp hf
rw [leadingCoeff_mul_X] at hf
simpa [abv_mul abv] using (ihp hf).atTop_mul_atTop hz
· intro _ a hd ihp hf
rw [add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt (degree_C_le.trans_lt hd)] at hf
refine tendsto_atTop_of_add_const_right (abv (-f a)) ?_
refine tendsto_atTop_mono (fun _ => abv_add abv _ _) ?_
simpa using ihp hf
#align polynomial.tendsto_abv_eval₂_at_top Polynomial.tendsto_abv_eval₂_atTop
theorem tendsto_abv_atTop {R k α : Type*} [Ring R] [LinearOrderedField k] (abv : R → k)
[IsAbsoluteValue abv] (p : R[X]) (h : 0 < degree p) {l : Filter α} {z : α → R}
(hz : Tendsto (abv ∘ z) l atTop) : Tendsto (fun x => abv (p.eval (z x))) l atTop := by
apply tendsto_abv_eval₂_atTop _ _ _ h _ hz
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 (ne_zero_of_degree_gt h)
#align polynomial.tendsto_abv_at_top Polynomial.tendsto_abv_atTop
theorem tendsto_abv_aeval_atTop {R A k α : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
[LinearOrderedField k] (abv : A → k) [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (p : R[X]) (hd : 0 < degree p)
(h₀ : algebraMap R A p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) {l : Filter α} {z : α → A}
(hz : Tendsto (abv ∘ z) l atTop) : Tendsto (fun x => abv (aeval (z x) p)) l atTop :=
tendsto_abv_eval₂_atTop _ abv p hd h₀ hz
#align polynomial.tendsto_abv_aeval_at_top Polynomial.tendsto_abv_aeval_atTop
variable {α R : Type*} [NormedRing R] [IsAbsoluteValue (norm : R → ℝ)]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop (p : R[X]) (h : 0 < degree p) {l : Filter α} {z : α → R}
(hz : Tendsto (fun x => ‖z x‖) l atTop) : Tendsto (fun x => ‖p.eval (z x)‖) l atTop :=
p.tendsto_abv_atTop norm h hz
#align polynomial.tendsto_norm_at_top Polynomial.tendsto_norm_atTop
theorem exists_forall_norm_le [ProperSpace R] (p : R[X]) : ∃ x, ∀ y, ‖p.eval x‖ ≤ ‖p.eval y‖ :=
if hp0 : 0 < degree p then
p.continuous.norm.exists_forall_le <| p.tendsto_norm_atTop hp0 tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
else
⟨p.coeff 0, by rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (le_of_not_gt hp0)]; simp⟩
#align polynomial.exists_forall_norm_le Polynomial.exists_forall_norm_le
section Roots
open Polynomial NNReal
variable {F K : Type*} [CommRing F] [NormedField K]
open Multiset
theorem eq_one_of_roots_le {p : F[X]} {f : F →+* K} {B : ℝ} (hB : B < 0) (h1 : p.Monic)
(h2 : Splits f p) (h3 : ∀ z ∈ (map f p).roots, ‖z‖ ≤ B) : p = 1 :=
h1.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one.mp (by
contrapose! hB
rw [← h1.natDegree_map f, natDegree_eq_card_roots' h2] at hB
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := card_pos_iff_exists_mem.mp (zero_lt_iff.mpr hB)
exact le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h3 z hz))
#align polynomial.eq_one_of_roots_le Polynomial.eq_one_of_roots_le
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Polynomial.lean | 168 | 193 | theorem coeff_le_of_roots_le {p : F[X]} {f : F →+* K} {B : ℝ} (i : ℕ) (h1 : p.Monic)
(h2 : Splits f p) (h3 : ∀ z ∈ (map f p).roots, ‖z‖ ≤ B) :
‖(map f p).coeff i‖ ≤ B ^ (p.natDegree - i) * p.natDegree.choose i := by |
obtain hB | hB := lt_or_le B 0
· rw [eq_one_of_roots_le hB h1 h2 h3, Polynomial.map_one, natDegree_one, zero_tsub, pow_zero,
one_mul, coeff_one]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
rw [← h1.natDegree_map f]
obtain hi | hi := lt_or_le (map f p).natDegree i
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hi, norm_zero]
positivity
rw [coeff_eq_esymm_roots_of_splits ((splits_id_iff_splits f).2 h2) hi, (h1.map _).leadingCoeff,
one_mul, norm_mul, norm_pow, norm_neg, norm_one, one_pow, one_mul]
apply ((norm_multiset_sum_le _).trans <| sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ fun r hr => _).trans
· rw [Multiset.map_map, card_map, card_powersetCard, ← natDegree_eq_card_roots' h2,
Nat.choose_symm hi, mul_comm, nsmul_eq_mul]
intro r hr
simp_rw [Multiset.mem_map] at hr
obtain ⟨_, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [mem_powersetCard] at hs
lift B to ℝ≥0 using hB
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← nnnormHom_apply, ← MonoidHom.coe_coe,
MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod]
refine (prod_le_pow_card _ B fun x hx => ?_).trans_eq (by rw [card_map, hs.2])
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.1 hx
exact h3 z (mem_of_le hs.1 hz)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
#align_import measure_theory.measure.content from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
/-!
# Contents
In this file we work with *contents*. A content `λ` is a function from a certain class of subsets
(such as the compact subsets) to `ℝ≥0` that is
* additive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are disjoint sets in the domain of `λ`,
then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) = λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* subadditive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) ≤ λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* monotone: If `K₁ ⊆ K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁) ≤ λ(K₂)`.
We show that:
* Given a content `λ` on compact sets, let us define a function `λ*` on open sets, by letting
`λ* U` be the supremum of `λ K` for `K` included in `U`. This is a countably subadditive map that
vanishes at `∅`. In Halmos (1950) this is called the *inner content* `λ*` of `λ`, and formalized
as `innerContent`.
* Given an inner content, we define an outer measure `μ*`, by letting `μ* E` be the infimum of
`λ* U` over the open sets `U` containing `E`. This is indeed an outer measure. It is formalized
as `outerMeasure`.
* Restricting this outer measure to Borel sets gives a regular measure `μ`.
We define bundled contents as `Content`.
In this file we only work on contents on compact sets, and inner contents on open sets, and both
contents and inner contents map into the extended nonnegative reals. However, in other applications
other choices can be made, and it is not a priori clear what the best interface should be.
## Main definitions
For `μ : Content G`, we define
* `μ.innerContent` : the inner content associated to `μ`.
* `μ.outerMeasure` : the outer measure associated to `μ`.
* `μ.measure` : the Borel measure associated to `μ`.
These definitions are given for spaces which are R₁.
The resulting measure `μ.measure` is always outer regular by design.
When the space is locally compact, `μ.measure` is also regular.
## References
* Paul Halmos (1950), Measure Theory, §53
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_(measure_theory)>
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {G : Type w} [TopologicalSpace G]
/-- A content is an additive function on compact sets taking values in `ℝ≥0`. It is a device
from which one can define a measure. -/
structure Content (G : Type w) [TopologicalSpace G] where
toFun : Compacts G → ℝ≥0
mono' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂ → toFun K₁ ≤ toFun K₂
sup_disjoint' :
∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂ → IsClosed (K₁ : Set G) → IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)
→ toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
sup_le' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
#align measure_theory.content MeasureTheory.Content
instance : Inhabited (Content G) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
mono' := by simp
sup_disjoint' := by simp
sup_le' := by simp }⟩
/-- Although the `toFun` field of a content takes values in `ℝ≥0`, we register a coercion to
functions taking values in `ℝ≥0∞` as most constructions below rely on taking iSups and iInfs, which
is more convenient in a complete lattice, and aim at constructing a measure. -/
instance : CoeFun (Content G) fun _ => Compacts G → ℝ≥0∞ :=
⟨fun μ s => μ.toFun s⟩
namespace Content
variable (μ : Content G)
theorem apply_eq_coe_toFun (K : Compacts G) : μ K = μ.toFun K :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.content.apply_eq_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.Content.apply_eq_coe_toFun
theorem mono (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂) : μ K₁ ≤ μ K₂ := by
simp [apply_eq_coe_toFun, μ.mono' _ _ h]
#align measure_theory.content.mono MeasureTheory.Content.mono
theorem sup_disjoint (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂)
(h₁ : IsClosed (K₁ : Set G)) (h₂ : IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)) :
μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simp [apply_eq_coe_toFun, μ.sup_disjoint' _ _ h]
#align measure_theory.content.sup_disjoint MeasureTheory.Content.sup_disjoint
theorem sup_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) : μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simp only [apply_eq_coe_toFun]
norm_cast
exact μ.sup_le' _ _
#align measure_theory.content.sup_le MeasureTheory.Content.sup_le
theorem lt_top (K : Compacts G) : μ K < ∞ :=
ENNReal.coe_lt_top
#align measure_theory.content.lt_top MeasureTheory.Content.lt_top
theorem empty : μ ⊥ = 0 := by
have := μ.sup_disjoint' ⊥ ⊥
simpa [apply_eq_coe_toFun] using this
#align measure_theory.content.empty MeasureTheory.Content.empty
/-- Constructing the inner content of a content. From a content defined on the compact sets, we
obtain a function defined on all open sets, by taking the supremum of the content of all compact
subsets. -/
def innerContent (U : Opens G) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (K : Compacts G) (_ : (K : Set G) ⊆ U), μ K
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent
theorem le_innerContent (K : Compacts G) (U : Opens G) (h2 : (K : Set G) ⊆ U) :
μ K ≤ μ.innerContent U :=
le_iSup_of_le K <| le_iSup (fun _ ↦ (μ.toFun K : ℝ≥0∞)) h2
#align measure_theory.content.le_inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.le_innerContent
theorem innerContent_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (h2 : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K :=
iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ _ (Subset.trans hK' h2)
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_le MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_le
theorem innerContent_of_isCompact {K : Set G} (h1K : IsCompact K) (h2K : IsOpen K) :
μ.innerContent ⟨K, h2K⟩ = μ ⟨K, h1K⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ ⟨K, h1K⟩ hK') (μ.le_innerContent _ _ Subset.rfl)
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_of_is_compact MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_of_isCompact
theorem innerContent_bot : μ.innerContent ⊥ = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
rw [← μ.empty]
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
have : K = ⊥ := by
ext1
rw [subset_empty_iff.mp hK, Compacts.coe_bot]
rw [this]
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_bot MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_bot
/-- This is "unbundled", because that is required for the API of `inducedOuterMeasure`. -/
theorem innerContent_mono ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_mono MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_mono
theorem innerContent_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.innerContent U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K + ε := by
have h'ε := ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε
rcases le_or_lt (μ.innerContent U) ε with h | h
· exact ⟨⊥, empty_subset _, le_add_left h⟩
have h₂ := ENNReal.sub_lt_self hU h.ne_bot h'ε
conv at h₂ => rhs; rw [innerContent]
simp only [lt_iSup_iff] at h₂
rcases h₂ with ⟨U, h1U, h2U⟩; refine ⟨U, h1U, ?_⟩
rw [← tsub_le_iff_right]; exact le_of_lt h2U
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_exists_compact MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_exists_compact
/-- The inner content of a supremum of opens is at most the sum of the individual inner contents. -/
theorem innerContent_iSup_nat [R1Space G] (U : ℕ → Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (⨆ i : ℕ, U i) ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent (U i) := by
have h3 : ∀ (t : Finset ℕ) (K : ℕ → Compacts G), μ (t.sup K) ≤ t.sum fun i => μ (K i) := by
intro t K
refine Finset.induction_on t ?_ ?_
· simp only [μ.empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Finset.sum_empty, Finset.sup_empty]
· intro n s hn ih
rw [Finset.sup_insert, Finset.sum_insert hn]
exact le_trans (μ.sup_le _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _)
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
K.isCompact.elim_finite_subcover _ (fun i => (U i).isOpen) (by rwa [← Opens.coe_iSup])
rcases K.isCompact.finite_compact_cover t (SetLike.coe ∘ U) (fun i _ => (U i).isOpen) ht with
⟨K', h1K', h2K', h3K'⟩
let L : ℕ → Compacts G := fun n => ⟨K' n, h1K' n⟩
convert le_trans (h3 t L) _
· ext1
rw [Compacts.coe_finset_sup, Finset.sup_eq_iSup]
exact h3K'
refine le_trans (Finset.sum_le_sum ?_) (ENNReal.sum_le_tsum t)
intro i _
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (L i))
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (h2K' i))
rfl
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_Sup_nat MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_iSup_nat
/-- The inner content of a union of sets is at most the sum of the individual inner contents.
This is the "unbundled" version of `innerContent_iSup_nat`.
It is required for the API of `inducedOuterMeasure`. -/
theorem innerContent_iUnion_nat [R1Space G] ⦃U : ℕ → Set G⦄
(hU : ∀ i : ℕ, IsOpen (U i)) :
μ.innerContent ⟨⋃ i : ℕ, U i, isOpen_iUnion hU⟩ ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent ⟨U i, hU i⟩ := by
have := μ.innerContent_iSup_nat fun i => ⟨U i, hU i⟩
rwa [Opens.iSup_def] at this
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_Union_nat MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_iUnion_nat
theorem innerContent_comap (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(U : Opens G) : μ.innerContent (Opens.comap f.toContinuousMap U) = μ.innerContent U := by
refine (Compacts.equiv f).surjective.iSup_congr _ fun K => iSup_congr_Prop image_subset_iff ?_
intro hK
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Compacts.equiv]
apply h
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_comap MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(U : Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g).toContinuousMap U) = μ.innerContent U := by
convert μ.innerContent_comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) (fun K => h g) U
#align measure_theory.content.is_mul_left_invariant_inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent
#align measure_theory.content.is_add_left_invariant_inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.is_add_left_invariant_innerContent
@[to_additive]
theorem innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (K : Compacts G)
(hK : μ K ≠ 0) (U : Opens G) (hU : (U : Set G).Nonempty) : 0 < μ.innerContent U := by
have : (interior (U : Set G)).Nonempty := by rwa [U.isOpen.interior_eq]
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates K.2 this with ⟨s, hs⟩
suffices μ K ≤ s.card * μ.innerContent U by
exact (ENNReal.mul_pos_iff.mp <| hK.bot_lt.trans_le this).2
have : (K : Set G) ⊆ ↑(⨆ g ∈ s, Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g).toContinuousMap U) := by
simpa only [Opens.iSup_def, Opens.coe_comap, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine (μ.le_innerContent _ _ this).trans ?_
refine
(rel_iSup_sum μ.innerContent μ.innerContent_bot (· ≤ ·) μ.innerContent_iSup_nat _ _).trans ?_
simp only [μ.is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent h3, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, le_refl]
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_pos_of_is_add_left_invariant MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_pos_of_is_add_left_invariant
theorem innerContent_mono' ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_mono' MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_mono'
section OuterMeasure
/-- Extending a content on compact sets to an outer measure on all sets. -/
protected def outerMeasure : OuterMeasure G :=
inducedOuterMeasure (fun U hU => μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩) isOpen_empty μ.innerContent_bot
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure
variable [R1Space G]
theorem outerMeasure_opens (U : Opens G) : μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent U :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq' (fun _ => isOpen_iUnion) μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono U.2
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_opens MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_opens
theorem outerMeasure_of_isOpen (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) :
μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
μ.outerMeasure_opens ⟨U, hU⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_of_is_open MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_of_isOpen
theorem outerMeasure_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (hUK : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens U).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le U K hUK
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_le MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_le
theorem le_outerMeasure_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ K ≤ μ.outerMeasure K := by
rw [Content.outerMeasure, inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf]
· exact le_iInf fun U => le_iInf fun hU => le_iInf <| μ.le_innerContent K ⟨U, hU⟩
· exact fun U hU => isOpen_iUnion hU
· exact μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat
· exact μ.innerContent_mono
#align measure_theory.content.le_outer_measure_compacts MeasureTheory.Content.le_outerMeasure_compacts
theorem outerMeasure_eq_iInf (A : Set G) :
μ.outerMeasure A = ⨅ (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) (_ : A ⊆ U), μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono A
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_eq_infi MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_eq_iInf
theorem outerMeasure_interior_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ.outerMeasure (interior K) ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens <| Opens.interior K).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le _ _ interior_subset
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_interior_compacts MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_interior_compacts
theorem outerMeasure_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.outerMeasure U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure K + ε := by
rw [μ.outerMeasure_opens] at hU ⊢
rcases μ.innerContent_exists_compact hU hε with ⟨K, h1K, h2K⟩
exact ⟨K, h1K, le_trans h2K <| add_le_add_right (μ.le_outerMeasure_compacts K) _⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_exists_compact MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_exists_compact
theorem outerMeasure_exists_open {A : Set G} (hA : μ.outerMeasure A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U : Opens G, A ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure A + ε := by
rcases inducedOuterMeasure_exists_set _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono hA
(ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε) with
⟨U, hU, h2U, h3U⟩
exact ⟨⟨U, hU⟩, h2U, h3U⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_exists_open MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_exists_open
theorem outerMeasure_preimage (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(A : Set G) : μ.outerMeasure (f ⁻¹' A) = μ.outerMeasure A := by
refine inducedOuterMeasure_preimage _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono _
(fun _ => f.isOpen_preimage) ?_
intro s hs
convert μ.innerContent_comap f h ⟨s, hs⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_preimage MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_preimage
theorem outerMeasure_lt_top_of_isCompact [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace G]
{K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) :
μ.outerMeasure K < ∞ := by
rcases exists_compact_superset hK with ⟨F, h1F, h2F⟩
calc
μ.outerMeasure K ≤ μ.outerMeasure (interior F) := measure_mono h2F
_ ≤ μ ⟨F, h1F⟩ := by
apply μ.outerMeasure_le ⟨interior F, isOpen_interior⟩ ⟨F, h1F⟩ interior_subset
_ < ⊤ := μ.lt_top _
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_lt_top_of_is_compact MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_lt_top_of_isCompact
@[to_additive]
theorem is_mul_left_invariant_outerMeasure [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(A : Set G) : μ.outerMeasure ((g * ·) ⁻¹' A) = μ.outerMeasure A := by
convert μ.outerMeasure_preimage (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) (fun K => h g) A
#align measure_theory.content.is_mul_left_invariant_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Content.is_mul_left_invariant_outerMeasure
#align measure_theory.content.is_add_left_invariant_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Content.is_add_left_invariant_outerMeasure
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Content.lean | 331 | 337 | theorem outerMeasure_caratheodory (A : Set G) :
MeasurableSet[μ.outerMeasure.caratheodory] A ↔
∀ U : Opens G, μ.outerMeasure (U ∩ A) + μ.outerMeasure (U \ A) ≤ μ.outerMeasure U := by |
rw [Opens.forall]
apply inducedOuterMeasure_caratheodory
· apply innerContent_iUnion_nat
· apply innerContent_mono'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Uniform
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
/-!
# Inner product space
This file defines inner product spaces and proves the basic properties. We do not formally
define Hilbert spaces, but they can be obtained using the set of assumptions
`[NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [CompleteSpace E]`.
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. It generalizes the notion of
dot product in `ℝ^n` and provides the means of defining the length of a vector and the angle between
two vectors. In particular vectors `x` and `y` are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero.
We define both the real and complex cases at the same time using the `RCLike` typeclass.
This file proves general results on inner product spaces. For the specific construction of an inner
product structure on `n → 𝕜` for `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`, see `EuclideanSpace` in
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2`.
## Main results
- We define the class `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` extending `NormedSpace 𝕜 E` with a number of basic
properties, most notably the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Here `𝕜` is understood to be either `ℝ`
or `ℂ`, through the `RCLike` typeclass.
- We show that the inner product is continuous, `continuous_inner`, and bundle it as the
continuous sesquilinear map `innerSL` (see also `innerₛₗ` for the non-continuous version).
- We define `Orthonormal`, a predicate on a function `v : ι → E`, and prove the existence of a
maximal orthonormal set, `exists_maximal_orthonormal`. Bessel's inequality,
`Orthonormal.tsum_inner_products_le`, states that given an orthonormal set `v` and a vector `x`,
the sum of the norm-squares of the inner products `⟪v i, x⟫` is no more than the norm-square of
`x`. For the existence of orthonormal bases, Hilbert bases, etc., see the file
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.projection`.
## Notation
We globally denote the real and complex inner products by `⟪·, ·⟫_ℝ` and `⟪·, ·⟫_ℂ` respectively.
We also provide two notation namespaces: `RealInnerProductSpace`, `ComplexInnerProductSpace`,
which respectively introduce the plain notation `⟪·, ·⟫` for the real and complex inner product.
## Implementation notes
We choose the convention that inner products are conjugate linear in the first argument and linear
in the second.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
## References
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open Topology ComplexConjugate
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
/-- Syntactic typeclass for types endowed with an inner product -/
class Inner (𝕜 E : Type*) where
/-- The inner product function. -/
inner : E → E → 𝕜
#align has_inner Inner
export Inner (inner)
/-- The inner product with values in `𝕜`. -/
notation3:max "⟪" x ", " y "⟫_" 𝕜:max => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
section Notations
/-- The inner product with values in `ℝ`. -/
scoped[RealInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℝ _ _ x y
/-- The inner product with values in `ℂ`. -/
scoped[ComplexInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℂ _ _ x y
end Notations
/-- An inner product space is a vector space with an additional operation called inner product.
The norm could be derived from the inner product, instead we require the existence of a norm and
the fact that `‖x‖^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫` to be able to put instances on `𝕂` or product
spaces.
To construct a norm from an inner product, see `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`.
-/
class InnerProductSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] extends
NormedSpace 𝕜 E, Inner 𝕜 E where
/-- The inner product induces the norm. -/
norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space InnerProductSpace
/-!
### Constructing a normed space structure from an inner product
In the definition of an inner product space, we require the existence of a norm, which is equal
(but maybe not defeq) to the square root of the scalar product. This makes it possible to put
an inner product space structure on spaces with a preexisting norm (for instance `ℝ`), with good
properties. However, sometimes, one would like to define the norm starting only from a well-behaved
scalar product. This is what we implement in this paragraph, starting from a structure
`InnerProductSpace.Core` stating that we have a nice scalar product.
Our goal here is not to develop a whole theory with all the supporting API, as this will be done
below for `InnerProductSpace`. Instead, we implement the bare minimum to go as directly as
possible to the construction of the norm and the proof of the triangular inequality.
Warning: Do not use this `Core` structure if the space you are interested in already has a norm
instance defined on it, otherwise this will create a second non-defeq norm instance!
-/
/-- A structure requiring that a scalar product is positive definite and symmetric, from which one
can construct an `InnerProductSpace` instance in `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`. -/
-- @[nolint HasNonemptyInstance] porting note: I don't think we have this linter anymore
structure InnerProductSpace.Core (𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [AddCommGroup F]
[Module 𝕜 F] extends Inner 𝕜 F where
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is positive (semi)definite. -/
nonneg_re : ∀ x, 0 ≤ re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is positive definite. -/
definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space.core InnerProductSpace.Core
/- We set `InnerProductSpace.Core` to be a class as we will use it as such in the construction
of the normed space structure that it produces. However, all the instances we will use will be
local to this proof. -/
attribute [class] InnerProductSpace.Core
/-- Define `InnerProductSpace.Core` from `InnerProductSpace`. Defined to reuse lemmas about
`InnerProductSpace.Core` for `InnerProductSpace`s. Note that the `Norm` instance provided by
`InnerProductSpace.Core.norm` is propositionally but not definitionally equal to the original
norm. -/
def InnerProductSpace.toCore [NormedAddCommGroup E] [c : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E :=
{ c with
nonneg_re := fun x => by
rw [← InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner]
apply sq_nonneg
definite := fun x hx =>
norm_eq_zero.1 <| pow_eq_zero (n := 2) <| by
rw [InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, hx, map_zero] }
#align inner_product_space.to_core InnerProductSpace.toCore
namespace InnerProductSpace.Core
variable [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation "normSqK" => @RCLike.normSq 𝕜 _
local notation "reK" => @RCLike.re 𝕜 _
local notation "ext_iff" => @RCLike.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
/-- Inner product defined by the `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. We can't reuse
`InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner` because it takes `InnerProductSpace.Core` as an explicit
argument. -/
def toInner' : Inner 𝕜 F :=
c.toInner
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_inner' InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner'
attribute [local instance] toInner'
/-- The norm squared function for `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. -/
def normSq (x : F) :=
reK ⟪x, x⟫
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq
local notation "normSqF" => @normSq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.conj_symm x y
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_conj_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_conj_symm
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
c.nonneg_re _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_nonneg InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_im (x : F) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]
simp [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_im InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_right
theorem ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : (normSqF x : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [ext_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [ofReal_re]; rfl, by simp only [inner_self_im, ofReal_im]⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.coe_norm_sq_eq_inner_self InnerProductSpace.Core.ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : F) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_re_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : F) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_im_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left];
simp only [conj_conj, inner_conj_symm, RingHom.map_mul]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_right
theorem inner_zero_left (x : F) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : F), inner_smul_left];
simp only [zero_mul, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_left
theorem inner_zero_right (x : F) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_right
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨c.definite _, by
rintro rfl
exact inner_zero_left _⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_zero
theorem normSq_eq_zero {x : F} : normSqF x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.trans
(by simp only [normSq, ext_iff, map_zero, inner_self_im, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff])
(@inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ x)
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_ne_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ne_zero
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : F) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
norm_num [ext_iff, inner_self_im]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_re_to_K InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ofReal_re
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_inner_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_symm
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : F) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_left
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : F) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_right
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left, inner_neg_left]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_left
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right, inner_neg_right]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_right
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : F) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm
/-- Expand `inner (x + y) (x + y)` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_add_self InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_add_self
-- Expand `inner (x - y) (x - y)`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_sub_self InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_sub_self
/-- An auxiliary equality useful to prove the **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**: the square of the norm
of `⟪x, y⟫ • x - ⟪x, x⟫ • y` is equal to `‖x‖ ^ 2 * (‖x‖ ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 - ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ^ 2)`. We use
`InnerProductSpace.ofCore.normSq x` etc (defeq to `is_R_or_C.re ⟪x, x⟫`) instead of `‖x‖ ^ 2`
etc to avoid extra rewrites when applying it to an `InnerProductSpace`. -/
theorem cauchy_schwarz_aux (x y : F) :
normSqF (⟪x, y⟫ • x - ⟪x, x⟫ • y) = normSqF x * (normSqF x * normSqF y - ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self]
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, conj_ofReal, mul_sub, ←
ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self x, ← ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self y]
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, RCLike.conj_mul, mul_left_comm, ← inner_conj_symm y, mul_conj]
push_cast
ring
#align inner_product_space.core.cauchy_schwarz_aux InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**.
We need this for the `Core` structure to prove the triangle inequality below when
showing the core is a normed group.
-/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simpa only [inner_zero_left, map_zero, zero_mul, norm_zero] using le_rfl
· have hx' : 0 < normSqF x := inner_self_nonneg.lt_of_ne' (mt normSq_eq_zero.1 hx)
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hx', ← normSq, ← normSq,
norm_inner_symm y, ← sq, ← cauchy_schwarz_aux]
exact inner_self_nonneg
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_mul_inner_self_le InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le
/-- Norm constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure, defined to be the square root
of the scalar product. -/
def toNorm : Norm F where norm x := √(re ⟪x, x⟫)
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.toNorm
attribute [local instance] toNorm
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := rfl
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_eq_sqrt_inner InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_eq_sqrt_inner
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫), sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm (x : F) : √(normSqF x) = ‖x‖ := rfl
#align inner_product_space.core.sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.sqrt_normSq_eq_norm
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (mul_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) <|
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [norm_inner_symm]
_ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ := inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_inner_le_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm
/-- Normed group structure constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure -/
def toNormedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup F :=
AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := fun x => √(re ⟪x, x⟫)
map_zero' := by simp only [sqrt_zero, inner_zero_right, map_zero]
neg' := fun x => by simp only [inner_neg_left, neg_neg, inner_neg_right]
add_le' := fun x y => by
have h₁ : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := norm_inner_le_norm _ _
have h₂ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ := re_le_norm _
have h₃ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := h₂.trans h₁
have h₄ : re ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
have : ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ ≤ (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) * (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_add_add_self, mul_add, mul_comm, map_add]
linarith
exact nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (add_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) this
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun x hx =>
normSq_eq_zero.1 <| (sqrt_eq_zero inner_self_nonneg).1 hx }
#align inner_product_space.core.to_normed_add_comm_group InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup
attribute [local instance] toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Normed space structure constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure -/
def toNormedSpace : NormedSpace 𝕜 F where
norm_smul_le r x := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, ← mul_assoc]
rw [RCLike.conj_mul, ← ofReal_pow, re_ofReal_mul, sqrt_mul, ← ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self,
ofReal_re]
· simp [sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, RCLike.sqrt_normSq_eq_norm]
· positivity
#align inner_product_space.core.to_normed_space InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedSpace
end InnerProductSpace.Core
section
attribute [local instance] InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Given an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure on a space, one can use it to turn
the space into an inner product space. The `NormedAddCommGroup` structure is expected
to already be defined with `InnerProductSpace.ofCore.toNormedAddCommGroup`. -/
def InnerProductSpace.ofCore [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] (c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F) :
InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F :=
letI : NormedSpace 𝕜 F := @InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedSpace 𝕜 F _ _ _ c
{ c with
norm_sq_eq_inner := fun x => by
have h₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 = √(re (c.inner x x)) ^ 2 := rfl
have h₂ : 0 ≤ re (c.inner x x) := InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
simp [h₁, sq_sqrt, h₂] }
#align inner_product_space.of_core InnerProductSpace.ofCore
end
/-! ### Properties of inner product spaces -/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_inner)
section BasicProperties
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_symm _ _
#align inner_conj_symm inner_conj_symm
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
#align real_inner_comm real_inner_comm
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
#align inner_eq_zero_symm inner_eq_zero_symm
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
#align inner_self_im inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_add_left inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_add_right inner_add_right
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_re_symm inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_im_symm inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_smul_left inner_smul_left
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
#align real_inner_smul_left real_inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
#align inner_smul_real_left inner_smul_real_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_mul, conj_conj, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_smul_right inner_smul_right
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
#align real_inner_smul_right real_inner_smul_right
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
#align inner_smul_real_right inner_smul_real_right
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
#align sesq_form_of_inner sesqFormOfInner
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
#align bilin_form_of_real_inner bilinFormOfRealInner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
#align sum_inner sum_inner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
#align inner_sum inner_sum
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert _root_.sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align finsupp.sum_inner Finsupp.sum_inner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert _root_.inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align finsupp.inner_sum Finsupp.inner_sum
theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [DFinsupp.sum, _root_.sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
#align dfinsupp.sum_inner DFinsupp.sum_inner
theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [DFinsupp.sum, _root_.inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align dfinsupp.inner_sum DFinsupp.inner_sum
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
#align inner_zero_left inner_zero_left
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
#align inner_re_zero_left inner_re_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_zero_right inner_zero_right
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
#align inner_re_zero_right inner_re_zero_right
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.toCore.nonneg_re x
#align inner_self_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_nonneg real_inner_self_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_re_to_K inner_self_ofReal_re
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_inner, ofReal_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
#align inner_self_re_eq_norm inner_self_re_eq_norm
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_norm_to_K inner_self_ofReal_norm
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_abs real_inner_self_abs
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 598 | 599 | theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by |
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.matrix.notation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a99f85220eaf38f14f94e04699943e185a5e1d1a"
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file includes `simp` lemmas for applying operations in `Data.Matrix.Basic` to values built out
of the matrix notation `![a, b] = vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)` defined in
`Data.Fin.VecNotation`.
This also provides the new notation `!![a, b; c, d] = Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
This notation also works for empty matrices; `!![,,,] : Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin 3)` and
`!![;;;] : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 0)`.
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
This file provide notation `!![a, b; c, d]` for matrices, which corresponds to
`Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
TODO: until we implement a `Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander` for `Matrix.of`, the pretty-printer will
not show `!!` notation, instead showing the version with `of ![![...]]`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `test/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u uₘ uₙ uₒ
variable {α : Type u} {o n m : ℕ} {m' : Type uₘ} {n' : Type uₙ} {o' : Type uₒ}
open Matrix
section toExpr
open Lean
open Qq
/-- Matrices can be reflected whenever their entries can. We insert a `Matrix.of` to
prevent immediate decay to a function. -/
protected instance toExpr [ToLevel.{u}] [ToLevel.{uₘ}] [ToLevel.{uₙ}]
[Lean.ToExpr α] [Lean.ToExpr m'] [Lean.ToExpr n'] [Lean.ToExpr (m' → n' → α)] :
Lean.ToExpr (Matrix m' n' α) :=
have eα : Q(Type $(toLevel.{u})) := toTypeExpr α
have em' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₘ})) := toTypeExpr m'
have en' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₙ})) := toTypeExpr n'
{ toTypeExpr :=
q(Matrix $eα $em' $en')
toExpr := fun M =>
have eM : Q($em' → $en' → $eα) := toExpr (show m' → n' → α from M)
q(Matrix.of $eM) }
#align matrix.matrix.reflect Matrix.toExpr
end toExpr
section Parser
open Lean Elab Term Macro TSyntax
/-- Notation for m×n matrices, aka `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α`.
For instance:
* `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is the matrix with two rows and three columns, of type
`Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 3) α`
* `!![a, b, c]` is a row vector of type `Matrix (Fin 1) (Fin 3) α` (see also `Matrix.row`).
* `!![a; b; c]` is a column vector of type `Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 1) α` (see also `Matrix.col`).
This notation implements some special cases:
* `![,,]`, with `n` `,`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin n) α`
* `![;;]`, with `m` `;`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin 0) α`
* `![]` is the 0×0 matrix
Note that vector notation is provided elsewhere (by `Matrix.vecNotation`) as `![a, b, c]`.
Under the hood, `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is syntax for `Matrix.of ![![a, b, c], ![d, e, f]]`.
-/
syntax (name := matrixNotation)
"!![" ppRealGroup(sepBy1(ppGroup(term,+,?), ";", "; ", allowTrailingSep)) "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotationRx0) "!![" ";"* "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotation0xC) "!![" ","+ "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(!![$[$[$rows],*];*]) => do
let m := rows.size
let n := if h : 0 < m then rows[0].size else 0
let rowVecs ← rows.mapM fun row : Array Term => do
unless row.size = n do
Macro.throwErrorAt (mkNullNode row) s!"\
Rows must be of equal length; this row has {row.size} items, \
the previous rows have {n}"
`(![$row,*])
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote m)) (Fin $(quote n)) _ ![$rowVecs,*])
| `(!![$[;%$semicolons]*]) => do
let emptyVec ← `(![])
let emptyVecs := semicolons.map (fun _ => emptyVec)
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote semicolons.size)) (Fin 0) _ ![$emptyVecs,*])
| `(!![$[,%$commas]*]) => `(@Matrix.of (Fin 0) (Fin $(quote commas.size)) _ ![])
end Parser
variable (a b : ℕ)
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a `Fin`-indexed matrix, for example:
```
#eval !![1, 2; 3, 4] + !![3, 4; 5, 6] -- !![4, 6; 8, 10]
```
-/
instance repr [Repr α] : Repr (Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α) where
reprPrec f _p :=
(Std.Format.bracket "!![" · "]") <|
(Std.Format.joinSep · (";" ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange m).map fun i =>
Std.Format.fill <| -- wrap line in a single place rather than all at once
(Std.Format.joinSep · ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange n).map fun j => _root_.repr (f i j)
#align matrix.has_repr Matrix.repr
@[simp]
theorem cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : Fin m → n' → α) (i j) :
vecCons v B i j = vecCons (v j) (fun i => B i j) i := by refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
#align matrix.cons_val' Matrix.cons_val'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: LHS does not simplify.
theorem head_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') : (vecHead fun i => B i j) = vecHead B j :=
rfl
#align matrix.head_val' Matrix.head_val'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: LHS does not simplify.
theorem tail_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') :
(vecTail fun i => B i j) = fun i => vecTail B i j := rfl
#align matrix.tail_val' Matrix.tail_val'
section DotProduct
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_empty (v w : Fin 0 → α) : dotProduct v w = 0 :=
Finset.sum_empty
#align matrix.dot_product_empty Matrix.dotProduct_empty
@[simp]
theorem cons_dotProduct (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (w : Fin n.succ → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) w = x * vecHead w + dotProduct v (vecTail w) := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
#align matrix.cons_dot_product Matrix.cons_dotProduct
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_cons (v : Fin n.succ → α) (x : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct v (vecCons x w) = vecHead v * x + dotProduct (vecTail v) w := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
#align matrix.dot_product_cons Matrix.dotProduct_cons
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Notation.lean | 174 | 175 | theorem cons_dotProduct_cons (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (y : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) (vecCons y w) = x * y + dotProduct v w := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
#align_import order.liminf_limsup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ffde2d8a6e689149e44fd95fa862c23a57f8c780"
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section Relation
/-- `f.IsBounded (≺)`: the filter `f` is eventually bounded w.r.t. the relation `≺`, i.e.
eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound.
`r` will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def IsBounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ᶠ x in f, r x b
#align filter.is_bounded Filter.IsBounded
/-- `f.IsBoundedUnder (≺) u`: the image of the filter `f` under `u` is eventually bounded w.r.t.
the relation `≺`, i.e. eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound. -/
def IsBoundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsBounded r
#align filter.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBoundedUnder
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {f g : Filter α}
/-- `f` is eventually bounded if and only if, there exists an admissible set on which it is
bounded. -/
theorem isBounded_iff : f.IsBounded r ↔ ∃ s ∈ f.sets, ∃ b, s ⊆ { x | r x b } :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨{ a | r a b }, hb, b, Subset.refl _⟩) fun ⟨_, hs, b, hb⟩ =>
⟨b, mem_of_superset hs hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_iff Filter.isBounded_iff
/-- A bounded function `u` is in particular eventually bounded. -/
theorem isBoundedUnder_of {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (∃ b, ∀ x, r (u x) b) → f.IsBoundedUnder r u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, r (u x) b from eventually_of_forall hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_of Filter.isBoundedUnder_of
theorem isBounded_bot : IsBounded r ⊥ ↔ Nonempty α := by simp [IsBounded, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_bounded_bot Filter.isBounded_bot
theorem isBounded_top : IsBounded r ⊤ ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x, r x t := by simp [IsBounded, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.is_bounded_top Filter.isBounded_top
theorem isBounded_principal (s : Set α) : IsBounded r (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x ∈ s, r x t := by
simp [IsBounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_bounded_principal Filter.isBounded_principal
theorem isBounded_sup [IsTrans α r] [IsDirected α r] :
IsBounded r f → IsBounded r g → IsBounded r (f ⊔ g)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨b₂, h₂⟩ =>
let ⟨b, rb₁b, rb₂b⟩ := directed_of r b₁ b₂
⟨b, eventually_sup.mpr
⟨h₁.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₁b, h₂.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₂b⟩⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_sup Filter.isBounded_sup
theorem IsBounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : IsBounded r g → IsBounded r f
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, h hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.mono Filter.IsBounded.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono {f g : Filter β} {u : β → α} (h : f ≤ g) :
g.IsBoundedUnder r u → f.IsBoundedUnder r u := fun hg => IsBounded.mono (map_mono h) hg
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_le [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u) (hv : v ≤ᶠ[l] u) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l v := by
apply hu.imp
exact fun b hb => (eventually_map.1 hb).mp <| hv.mono fun x => le_trans
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_le Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u) (hv : u ≤ᶠ[l] v) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l v :=
IsBoundedUnder.mono_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu hv
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_ge Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge
theorem isBoundedUnder_const [IsRefl α r] {l : Filter β} {a : α} : IsBoundedUnder r l fun _ => a :=
⟨a, eventually_map.2 <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => refl _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_const Filter.isBoundedUnder_const
theorem IsBounded.isBoundedUnder {q : β → β → Prop} {u : α → β}
(hu : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (u a₀) (u a₁)) : f.IsBounded r → f.IsBoundedUnder q u
| ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨u b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, q (u x) (u b) from h.mono fun x => hu x b⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBounded.isBoundedUnder
theorem IsBoundedUnder.comp {l : Filter γ} {q : β → β → Prop} {u : γ → α} {v : α → β}
(hv : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (v a₀) (v a₁)) : l.IsBoundedUnder r u → l.IsBoundedUnder q (v ∘ u)
| ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨v a, show ∀ᶠ x in map u l, q (v x) (v a) from h.mono fun x => hv x a⟩
/-- A bounded above function `u` is in particular eventually bounded above. -/
lemma _root_.BddAbove.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddAbove (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_upperBounds] using hb⟩
/-- A bounded below function `u` is in particular eventually bounded below. -/
lemma _root_.BddBelow.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddBelow (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds] using hb⟩
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f := by
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [eventually_map] at hb
obtain ⟨b', h⟩ := exists_gt b
have hb' := (tendsto_atTop.mp hf) b'
have : { x : α | f x ≤ b } ∩ { x : α | b' ≤ f x } = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x hx => (not_le_of_lt h) (le_trans hx.2 hx.1)
exact (nonempty_of_mem (hb.and hb')).ne_empty this
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_bot Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) cofinite f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨b, hb⟩
haveI : Nonempty β := ⟨b⟩
rw [← image_univ, ← union_compl_self { x | f x ≤ b }, image_union, bddAbove_union]
exact ⟨⟨b, forall_mem_image.2 fun x => id⟩, (hb.image f).bddAbove⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) cofinite f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) atTop f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop] at hf
exact hf.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) atTop f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range
/-- `IsCobounded (≺) f` states that the filter `f` does not tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is
also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`.
There is a subtlety in this definition: we want `f.IsCobounded` to hold for any `f` in the case of
complete lattices. This will be relevant to deduce theorems on complete lattices from their
versions on conditionally complete lattices with additional assumptions. We have to be careful in
the edge case of the trivial filter containing the empty set: the other natural definition
`¬ ∀ a, ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n`
would not work as well in this case.
-/
def IsCobounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ᶠ x in f, r x a) → r b a
#align filter.is_cobounded Filter.IsCobounded
/-- `IsCoboundedUnder (≺) f u` states that the image of the filter `f` under the map `u` does not
tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated
with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def IsCoboundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsCobounded r
#align filter.is_cobounded_under Filter.IsCoboundedUnder
/-- To check that a filter is frequently bounded, it suffices to have a witness
which bounds `f` at some point for every admissible set.
This is only an implication, as the other direction is wrong for the trivial filter. -/
theorem IsCobounded.mk [IsTrans α r] (a : α) (h : ∀ s ∈ f, ∃ x ∈ s, r a x) : f.IsCobounded r :=
⟨a, fun _ s =>
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ s
_root_.trans h₂ h₁⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded.mk Filter.IsCobounded.mk
/-- A filter which is eventually bounded is in particular frequently bounded (in the opposite
direction). At least if the filter is not trivial. -/
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_flip [IsTrans α r] [NeBot f] : f.IsBounded r → f.IsCobounded (flip r)
| ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
⟨a, fun b hb =>
let ⟨_, rxa, rbx⟩ := (ha.and hb).exists
show r b a from _root_.trans rbx rxa⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_flip Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_ge [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_ge Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_ge
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_le [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_le Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_flip {l : Filter γ} [IsTrans α r] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder r u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (flip r) u :=
h.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
theorem isCobounded_bot : IsCobounded r ⊥ ↔ ∃ b, ∀ x, r b x := by simp [IsCobounded]
#align filter.is_cobounded_bot Filter.isCobounded_bot
theorem isCobounded_top : IsCobounded r ⊤ ↔ Nonempty α := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [IsCobounded, eq_univ_iff_forall,
exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_cobounded_top Filter.isCobounded_top
theorem isCobounded_principal (s : Set α) :
(𝓟 s).IsCobounded r ↔ ∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ x ∈ s, r x a) → r b a := by simp [IsCobounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_cobounded_principal Filter.isCobounded_principal
theorem IsCobounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : f.IsCobounded r → g.IsCobounded r
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, fun a ha => hb a (h ha)⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded.mono Filter.IsCobounded.mono
end Relation
section Nonempty
variable [Preorder α] [Nonempty α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
theorem isBounded_le_atBot : (atBot : Filter α).IsBounded (· ≤ ·) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨a, eventually_le_atBot _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_le_at_bot Filter.isBounded_le_atBot
theorem isBounded_ge_atTop : (atTop : Filter α).IsBounded (· ≥ ·) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨a, eventually_ge_atTop _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_ge_at_top Filter.isBounded_ge_atTop
theorem Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot (h : Tendsto u f atBot) : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u :=
isBounded_le_atBot.mono h
#align filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_le_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot
theorem Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop (h : Tendsto u f atTop) : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
isBounded_ge_atTop.mono h
#align filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_ge_at_top Filter.Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop
theorem bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {u : ℕ → α}
(hx : Tendsto u atTop atBot) : BddAbove (Set.range u) :=
hx.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot.bddAbove_range
#align filter.bdd_above_range_of_tendsto_at_top_at_bot Filter.bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot
theorem bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {u : ℕ → α}
(hx : Tendsto u atTop atTop) : BddBelow (Set.range u) :=
hx.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop.bddBelow_range
#align filter.bdd_below_range_of_tendsto_at_top_at_top Filter.bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop
end Nonempty
theorem isCobounded_le_of_bot [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨⊥, fun _ _ => bot_le⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded_le_of_bot Filter.isCobounded_le_of_bot
theorem isCobounded_ge_of_top [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) :=
⟨⊤, fun _ _ => le_top⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded_ge_of_top Filter.isCobounded_ge_of_top
theorem isBounded_le_of_top [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨⊤, eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_top⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_le_of_top Filter.isBounded_le_of_top
theorem isBounded_ge_of_bot [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) :=
⟨⊥, eventually_of_forall fun _ => bot_le⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_ge_of_bot Filter.isBounded_ge_of_bot
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (e : α ≃o β) {l : Filter γ}
{u : γ → α} : (IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => e (u x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u :=
(Function.Surjective.exists e.surjective).trans <|
exists_congr fun a => by simp only [eventually_map, e.le_iff_le]
#align order_iso.is_bounded_under_le_comp OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (e : α ≃o β) {l : Filter γ}
{u : γ → α} : (IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => e (u x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u :=
OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp e.dual
#align order_iso.is_bounded_under_ge_comp OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_inv [OrderedCommGroup α] {l : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => (u x)⁻¹) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u :=
(OrderIso.inv α).isBoundedUnder_ge_comp
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_inv Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_inv
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_neg Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_inv [OrderedCommGroup α] {l : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => (u x)⁻¹) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u :=
(OrderIso.inv α).isBoundedUnder_le_comp
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_inv Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_inv
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_neg Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_neg
theorem IsBoundedUnder.sup [SemilatticeSup α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u →
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => u a ⊔ v a
| ⟨bu, (hu : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ bu)⟩, ⟨bv, (hv : ∀ᶠ x in f, v x ≤ bv)⟩ =>
⟨bu ⊔ bv, show ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ⊔ v x ≤ bu ⊔ bv
by filter_upwards [hu, hv] with _ using sup_le_sup⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under.sup Filter.IsBoundedUnder.sup
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_sup [SemilatticeSup α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => u a ⊔ v a) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono_le <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_sup_left,
h.mono_le <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_sup_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_sup Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_sup
theorem IsBoundedUnder.inf [SemilatticeInf α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u →
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun a => u a ⊓ v a :=
IsBoundedUnder.sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.is_bounded_under.inf Filter.IsBoundedUnder.inf
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_inf [SemilatticeInf α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun a => u a ⊓ v a) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v :=
isBoundedUnder_le_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_inf Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_inf
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_abs [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => |u a|) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
isBoundedUnder_le_sup.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl isBoundedUnder_le_neg
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_abs Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_abs
/-- Filters are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `isBoundedDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hf : f.IsBounded (≥) := by isBoundedDefault)`. -/
macro "isBoundedDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply isCobounded_le_of_bot
| apply isCobounded_ge_of_top
| apply isBounded_le_of_top
| apply isBounded_ge_of_bot)
-- Porting note: The above is a lean 4 reconstruction of (note that applyc is not available (yet?)):
-- unsafe def is_bounded_default : tactic Unit :=
-- tactic.applyc `` is_cobounded_le_of_bot <|>
-- tactic.applyc `` is_cobounded_ge_of_top <|>
-- tactic.applyc `` is_bounded_le_of_top <|> tactic.applyc `` is_bounded_ge_of_bot
-- #align filter.is_bounded_default filter.IsBounded_default
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α]
-- Porting note: Renamed from Limsup and Liminf to limsSup and limsInf
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup Filter.limsSup
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf Filter.limsInf
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
#align filter.limsup Filter.limsup
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
#align filter.liminf Filter.liminf
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
#align filter.blimsup Filter.blimsup
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
#align filter.bliminf Filter.bliminf
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
#align filter.limsup_eq Filter.limsup_eq
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
#align filter.liminf_eq Filter.liminf_eq
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
#align filter.blimsup_eq Filter.blimsup_eq
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
#align filter.bliminf_eq Filter.bliminf_eq
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
#align filter.blimsup_true Filter.blimsup_true
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
#align filter.bliminf_true Filter.bliminf_true
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype Filter.blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype Filter.bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_of_le
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.le_Liminf_of_le Filter.le_limsInf_of_le
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
#align filter.limsup_le_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_of_le
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
#align filter.le_liminf_of_le Filter.le_liminf_of_le
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.le_Limsup_of_le Filter.le_limsSup_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_of_le Filter.limsInf_le_of_le
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
#align filter.le_limsup_of_le Filter.le_limsup_of_le
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
#align filter.liminf_le_of_le Filter.liminf_le_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault):
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Limsup Filter.limsInf_le_limsSup
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault):
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
#align filter.liminf_le_limsup Filter.liminf_le_limsup
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_Limsup Filter.limsSup_le_limsSup
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Liminf Filter.limsInf_le_limsInf
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
#align filter.limsup_le_limsup Filter.limsup_le_limsup
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
#align filter.liminf_le_liminf Filter.liminf_le_liminf
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_Limsup_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Liminf_of_le Filter.limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
#align filter.limsup_le_limsup_of_le Filter.limsup_le_limsup_of_le
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
#align filter.liminf_le_liminf_of_le Filter.liminf_le_liminf_of_le
theorem limsSup_principal {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upper_bounds_eq_csSup h hs
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_principal Filter.limsSup_principal
theorem limsInf_principal {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_principal Filter.limsInf_principal
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
#align filter.limsup_congr Filter.limsup_congr
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
#align filter.blimsup_congr Filter.blimsup_congr
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.bliminf_congr Filter.bliminf_congr
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.liminf_congr Filter.liminf_congr
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
#align filter.limsup_const Filter.limsup_const
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
#align filter.liminf_const Filter.liminf_const
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
-- Porting note: simp_nf linter incorrectly says: lhs does not simplify when using simp on itself.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
change liminf (f ∘ (· + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop
rw [liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
#align filter.liminf_nat_add Filter.liminf_nat_add
-- Porting note: simp_nf linter incorrectly says: lhs does not simplify when using simp on itself.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
#align filter.limsup_nat_add Filter.limsup_nat_add
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_bot Filter.limsSup_bot
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_bot Filter.limsInf_bot
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_top Filter.limsSup_top
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_top Filter.limsInf_top
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
#align filter.blimsup_false Filter.blimsup_false
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
#align filter.bliminf_false Filter.bliminf_false
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
#align filter.limsup_const_bot Filter.limsup_const_bot
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.liminf_const_top Filter.liminf_const_top
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.has_basis.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup Filter.HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.has_basis.Liminf_eq_supr_Inf Filter.HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup Filter.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_eq_supr_Inf Filter.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (eventually_of_forall (le_iSup u))
#align filter.limsup_le_supr Filter.limsup_le_iSup
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (eventually_of_forall (iInf_le u))
#align filter.infi_le_liminf Filter.iInf_le_liminf
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat' Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat'
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
#align filter.has_basis.limsup_eq_infi_supr Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
#align filter.blimsup_congr' Filter.blimsup_congr'
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.bliminf_congr' Filter.bliminf_congr'
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_infi_bsupr Filter.blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_infi_bsupr_of_nat Filter.blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat' Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat'
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.has_basis.liminf_eq_supr_infi Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
#align filter.bliminf_eq_supr_binfi Filter.bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
#align filter.bliminf_eq_supr_binfi_of_nat Filter.bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 914 | 924 | theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by |
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris Van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.measure.regular from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
/-!
# Regular measures
A measure is `OuterRegular` if the measure of any measurable set `A` is the infimum of `μ U` over
all open sets `U` containing `A`.
A measure is `WeaklyRegular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to closed sets: the measure of any open set `U`
is the supremum of `μ F` over all closed sets `F` contained in `U`.
A measure is `Regular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is finite on compact sets;
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to compacts closed sets: the measure of any open
set `U` is the supremum of `μ K` over all compact sets `K` contained in `U`.
A measure is `InnerRegular` if it is inner regular for measurable sets with respect to compact
sets: the measure of any measurable set `s` is the supremum of `μ K` over all compact
sets contained in `s`.
A measure is `InnerRegularCompactLTTop` if it is inner regular for measurable sets of finite
measure with respect to compact sets: the measure of any measurable set `s` is the supremum
of `μ K` over all compact sets contained in `s`.
There is a reason for this zoo of regularity classes:
* A finite measure on a metric space is always weakly regular. Therefore, in probability theory,
weakly regular measures play a prominent role.
* In locally compact topological spaces, there are two competing notions of Radon measures: the
ones that are regular, and the ones that are inner regular. For any of these two notions, there is
a Riesz representation theorem, and an existence and uniqueness statement for the Haar measure in
locally compact topological groups. The two notions coincide in sigma-compact spaces, but they
differ in general, so it is worth having the two of them.
* Both notions of Haar measure satisfy the weaker notion `InnerRegularCompactLTTop`, so it is worth
trying to express theorems using this weaker notion whenever possible, to make sure that it
applies to both Haar measures simultaneously.
While traditional textbooks on measure theory on locally compact spaces emphasize regular measures,
more recent textbooks emphasize that inner regular Haar measures are better behaved than regular
Haar measures, so we will develop both notions.
The five conditions above are registered as typeclasses for a measure `μ`, and implications between
them are recorded as instances. For example, in a Hausdorff topological space, regularity implies
weak regularity. Also, regularity or inner regularity both imply `InnerRegularCompactLTTop`.
In a regular locally compact finite measure space, then regularity, inner regularity
and `InnerRegularCompactLTTop` are all equivalent.
In order to avoid code duplication, we also define a measure `μ` to be `InnerRegularWRT` for sets
satisfying a predicate `q` with respect to sets satisfying a predicate `p` if for any set
`U ∈ {U | q U}` and a number `r < μ U` there exists `F ⊆ U` such that `p F` and `r < μ F`.
There are two main nontrivial results in the development below:
* `InnerRegularWRT.measurableSet_of_isOpen` shows that, for an outer regular measure, inner
regularity for open sets with respect to compact sets or closed sets implies inner regularity for
all measurable sets of finite measure (with respect to compact sets or closed sets respectively).
* `InnerRegularWRT.weaklyRegular_of_finite` shows that a finite measure which is inner regular for
open sets with respect to closed sets (for instance a finite measure on a metric space) is weakly
regular.
All other results are deduced from these ones.
Here is an example showing how regularity and inner regularity may differ even on locally compact
spaces. Consider the group `ℝ × ℝ` where the first factor has the discrete topology and the second
one the usual topology. It is a locally compact Hausdorff topological group, with Haar measure equal
to Lebesgue measure on each vertical fiber. Let us consider the regular version of Haar measure.
Then the set `ℝ × {0}` has infinite measure (by outer regularity), but any compact set it contains
has zero measure (as it is finite). In fact, this set only contains subset with measure zero or
infinity. The inner regular version of Haar measure, on the other hand, gives zero mass to the
set `ℝ × {0}`.
Another interesting example is the sum of the Dirac masses at rational points in the real line.
It is a σ-finite measure on a locally compact metric space, but it is not outer regular: for
outer regularity, one needs additional locally finite assumptions. On the other hand, it is
inner regular.
Several authors require both regularity and inner regularity for their measures. We have opted
for the more fine grained definitions above as they apply more generally.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is outer regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a topological
space is regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is weakly regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT μ p q`: a non-typeclass predicate saying that a measure `μ`
is inner regular for sets satisfying `q` with respect to sets satisfying `p`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is inner regular for measurable sets with respect to compact sets.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularCompactLTTop μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ`
on a topological space is inner regular for measurable sets of finite measure with respect to
compact sets.
## Main results
### Outer regular measures
* `Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, the measure of a
set is the infimum of the measure of open sets containing it.
* `Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, for every set `s`
and `r > μ s` there exists an open superset `U ⊇ s` of measure less than `r`.
* push forward of an outer regular measure is outer regular, and scalar multiplication of a regular
measure by a finite number is outer regular.
### Weakly regular measures
* `IsOpen.measure_eq_iSup_isClosed` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `IsOpen.exists_lt_isClosed`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a closed `F ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isClosed_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isClosed_of_ne_top` and `MeasurableSet.exists_isClosed_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a closed subset (stated as
`r < μ F` and `μ s < μ F + ε`, respectively).
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.of_pseudoMetrizableSpace_of_isFiniteMeasure` is an
instance registering that a finite measure on a metric space is weakly regular (in fact, a pseudo
metrizable space is enough);
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.of_pseudoMetrizableSpace_secondCountable_of_locallyFinite`
is an instance registering that a locally finite measure on a second countable metric space (or
even a pseudo metrizable space) is weakly regular.
### Regular measures
* `IsOpen.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `IsOpen.exists_lt_isCompact`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a compact `K ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular.of_sigmaCompactSpace_of_isLocallyFiniteMeasure` is an
instance registering that a locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact metric space is regular (in
fact, an emetric space is enough).
### Inner regular measures
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact` asserts that the measure of a measurable set is the
supremum of the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isCompact`: for a measurable set `s` and `r < μ s`, there exists a
compact `K ⊆ s` of measure greater than `r`;
### Inner regular measures for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isCompact_of_ne_top` and `MeasurableSet.exists_isCompact_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a compact subset (stated as
`r < μ K` and `μ s < μ K + ε`, respectively).
## Implementation notes
The main nontrivial statement is `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegular.weaklyRegular_of_finite`,
expressing that in a finite measure space, if every open set can be approximated from inside by
closed sets, then the measure is in fact weakly regular. To prove that we show that any measurable
set can be approximated from inside by closed sets and from outside by open sets. This statement is
proved by measurable induction, starting from open sets and checking that it is stable by taking
complements (this is the point of this condition, being symmetrical between inside and outside) and
countable disjoint unions.
Once this statement is proved, one deduces results for `σ`-finite measures from this statement, by
restricting them to finite measure sets (and proving that this restriction is weakly regular, using
again the same statement).
For non-Hausdorff spaces, one may argue whether the right condition for inner regularity is with
respect to compact sets, or to compact closed sets. For instance,
[Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 4, 411J)][fremlin_vol4] considers measures which are inner
regular with respect to compact closed sets (and calls them *tight*). However, since most of the
literature uses mere compact sets, we have chosen to follow this convention. It doesn't make a
difference in Hausdorff spaces, of course. In locally compact topological groups, the two
conditions coincide, since if a compact set `k` is contained in a measurable set `u`, then the
closure of `k` is a compact closed set still contained in `u`, see
`IsCompact.closure_subset_of_measurableSet_of_group`.
## References
[Halmos, Measure Theory, §52][halmos1950measure]. Note that Halmos uses an unusual definition of
Borel sets (for him, they are elements of the `σ`-algebra generated by compact sets!), so his
proofs or statements do not apply directly.
[Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures][billingsley1999]
[Bogachev, Measure Theory, volume 2, Theorem 7.11.1][bogachev2007]
-/
open Set Filter ENNReal Topology NNReal TopologicalSpace
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- We say that a measure `μ` is *inner regular* with respect to predicates `p q : Set α → Prop`,
if for every `U` such that `q U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a subset `K ⊆ U` satisfying `p K`
of measure greater than `r`.
This definition is used to prove some facts about regular and weakly regular measures without
repeating the proofs. -/
def InnerRegularWRT {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (p q : Set α → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃U⦄, q U → ∀ r < μ U, ∃ K, K ⊆ U ∧ p K ∧ r < μ K
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT
namespace InnerRegularWRT
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {p q : Set α → Prop} {U : Set α}
{ε : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem measure_eq_iSup (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (hU : q U) :
μ U = ⨆ (K) (_ : K ⊆ U) (_ : p K), μ K := by
refine
le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun r hr => ?_) (iSup₂_le fun K hK => iSup_le fun _ => μ.mono hK)
simpa only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using H hU r hr
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.measure_eq_supr MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.measure_eq_iSup
theorem exists_subset_lt_add (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (h0 : p ∅) (hU : q U) (hμU : μ U ≠ ∞)
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K, K ⊆ U ∧ p K ∧ μ U < μ K + ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ U) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· refine ⟨∅, empty_subset _, h0, ?_⟩
rwa [measure_empty, h₀, zero_add, pos_iff_ne_zero]
· rcases H hU _ (ENNReal.sub_lt_self hμU h₀ hε) with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hrK⟩
exact ⟨K, hKU, hKc, ENNReal.lt_add_of_sub_lt_right (Or.inl hμU) hrK⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.exists_subset_lt_add MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.exists_subset_lt_add
protected theorem map {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
{μ : Measure α} {pa qa : Set α → Prop}
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ pa qa) {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {pb qb : Set β → Prop}
(hAB : ∀ U, qb U → qa (f ⁻¹' U)) (hAB' : ∀ K, pa K → pb (f '' K))
(hB₂ : ∀ U, qb U → MeasurableSet U) :
InnerRegularWRT (map f μ) pb qb := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf (hB₂ _ hU)] at hr
rcases H (hAB U hU) r hr with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hK⟩
refine ⟨f '' K, image_subset_iff.2 hKU, hAB' _ hKc, ?_⟩
exact hK.trans_le (le_map_apply_image hf _)
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.map MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.map
theorem map' {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {μ : Measure α} {pa qa : Set α → Prop}
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ pa qa) (f : α ≃ᵐ β) {pb qb : Set β → Prop}
(hAB : ∀ U, qb U → qa (f ⁻¹' U)) (hAB' : ∀ K, pa K → pb (f '' K)) :
InnerRegularWRT (map f μ) pb qb := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [f.map_apply U] at hr
rcases H (hAB U hU) r hr with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hK⟩
refine ⟨f '' K, image_subset_iff.2 hKU, hAB' _ hKc, ?_⟩
rwa [f.map_apply, f.preimage_image]
theorem smul (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : InnerRegularWRT (c • μ) p q := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [smul_apply, H.measure_eq_iSup hU, smul_eq_mul] at hr
simpa only [ENNReal.mul_iSup, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using hr
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.smul MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.smul
theorem trans {q' : Set α → Prop} (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (H' : InnerRegularWRT μ q q') :
InnerRegularWRT μ p q' := by
intro U hU r hr
rcases H' hU r hr with ⟨F, hFU, hqF, hF⟩; rcases H hqF _ hF with ⟨K, hKF, hpK, hrK⟩
exact ⟨K, hKF.trans hFU, hpK, hrK⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.trans MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.trans
theorem rfl {p : Set α → Prop} : InnerRegularWRT μ p p :=
fun U hU _r hr ↦ ⟨U, Subset.rfl, hU, hr⟩
theorem of_imp (h : ∀ s, q s → p s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p q :=
fun U hU _ hr ↦ ⟨U, Subset.rfl, h U hU, hr⟩
theorem mono {p' q' : Set α → Prop} (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q)
(h : ∀ s, q' s → q s) (h' : ∀ s, p s → p' s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p' q' :=
of_imp h' |>.trans H |>.trans (of_imp h)
end InnerRegularWRT
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
/-- A measure `μ` is outer regular if `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for a measurable set `A`.
This definition implies the same equality for any (not necessarily measurable) set, see
`Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen`. -/
class OuterRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected outerRegular :
∀ ⦃A : Set α⦄, MeasurableSet A → ∀ r > μ A, ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular.outer_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular.outerRegular
/-- A measure `μ` is regular if
- it is finite on all compact sets;
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using compact sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ U compact}` for `U` open. -/
class Regular (μ : Measure α) extends IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ, OuterRegular μ : Prop where
innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact IsOpen
#align measure_theory.measure.regular MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
/-- A measure `μ` is weakly regular if
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using closed sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(F) | F ⊆ U closed}` for `U` open. -/
class WeaklyRegular (μ : Measure α) extends OuterRegular μ : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen
#align measure_theory.measure.weakly_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular
#align measure_theory.measure.weakly_regular.inner_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.innerRegular
/-- A measure `μ` is inner regular if, for any measurable set `s`, then
`μ(s) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ s compact}`. -/
class InnerRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s)
/-- A measure `μ` is inner regular for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets:
for any measurable set `s` with finite measure, then `μ(s) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ s compact}`.
The main interest of this class is that it is satisfied for both natural Haar measures (the
regular one and the inner regular one). -/
class InnerRegularCompactLTTop (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A regular measure is weakly regular in an R₁ space. -/
instance (priority := 100) Regular.weaklyRegular [R1Space α] [Regular μ] :
WeaklyRegular μ where
innerRegular := fun _U hU r hr ↦
let ⟨K, KU, K_comp, hK⟩ := Regular.innerRegular hU r hr
⟨closure K, K_comp.closure_subset_of_isOpen hU KU, isClosed_closure,
hK.trans_le (measure_mono subset_closure)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.regular.weakly_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular.weaklyRegular
namespace OuterRegular
instance zero : OuterRegular (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨fun A _ _r hr => ⟨univ, subset_univ A, isOpen_univ, hr⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular.zero MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular.zero
/-- Given `r` larger than the measure of a set `A`, there exists an open superset of `A` with
measure less than `r`. -/
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : μ A < r) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r := by
rcases OuterRegular.outerRegular (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ A) r
(by rwa [measure_toMeasurable]) with
⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, (subset_toMeasurable _ _).trans hAU, hUo, hU⟩
#align set.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt
/-- For an outer regular measure, the measure of a set is the infimum of the measures of open sets
containing it. -/
theorem _root_.Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] :
μ A = ⨅ (U : Set α) (_ : A ⊆ U) (_ : IsOpen U), μ U := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun s hs => le_iInf fun _ => μ.mono hs) ?_
refine le_of_forall_lt' fun r hr => ?_
simpa only [iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] using A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt r hr
#align set.measure_eq_infi_is_open Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_add [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (hA : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < μ A + ε :=
A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ (ENNReal.lt_add_right hA hε)
#align set.exists_is_open_lt_add Set.exists_isOpen_lt_add
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_le_add (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U ≤ μ A + ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ A) ∞ with (H | H)
· exact ⟨univ, subset_univ _, isOpen_univ, by simp only [H, _root_.top_add, le_top]⟩
· rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add H hε with ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU.le⟩
#align set.exists_is_open_le_add Set.exists_isOpen_le_add
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt [OuterRegular μ] {A : Set α}
(hA : MeasurableSet A) (hA' : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < ∞ ∧ μ (U \ A) < ε := by
rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add hA' hε with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
use U, hAU, hUo, hU.trans_le le_top
exact measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add hA hAU hA' hU
#align measurable_set.exists_is_open_diff_lt MeasurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt
protected theorem map [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] (f : α ≃ₜ β) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] :
(Measure.map f μ).OuterRegular := by
refine ⟨fun A hA r hr => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply f.measurable hA, ← f.image_symm] at hr
rcases Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ r hr with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
have : IsOpen (f.symm ⁻¹' U) := hUo.preimage f.symm.continuous
refine ⟨f.symm ⁻¹' U, image_subset_iff.1 hAU, this, ?_⟩
rwa [map_apply f.measurable this.measurableSet, f.preimage_symm, f.preimage_image]
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular.map MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular.map
protected theorem smul (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ∞) :
(x • μ).OuterRegular := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h0)
· rw [zero_smul]
exact OuterRegular.zero
· refine ⟨fun A _ r hr => ?_⟩
rw [smul_apply, A.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen, smul_eq_mul] at hr
simpa only [ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne h0 hx, gt_iff_lt, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] using hr
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular.smul MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular.smul
instance smul_nnreal (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] (c : ℝ≥0) :
OuterRegular (c • μ) :=
OuterRegular.smul μ coe_ne_top
/-- If the restrictions of a measure to countably many open sets covering the space are
outer regular, then the measure itself is outer regular. -/
lemma of_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : ℕ → Set α}
(h : ∀ n, OuterRegular (μ.restrict (s n))) (h' : ∀ n, IsOpen (s n)) (h'' : univ ⊆ ⋃ n, s n) :
OuterRegular μ := by
refine ⟨fun A hA r hr => ?_⟩
have HA : μ A < ∞ := lt_of_lt_of_le hr le_top
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n) := fun n => (h' n).measurableSet
-- Note that `A = ⋃ n, A ∩ disjointed s n`. We replace `A` with this sequence.
obtain ⟨A, hAm, hAs, hAd, rfl⟩ :
∃ A' : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, MeasurableSet (A' n)) ∧
(∀ n, A' n ⊆ s n) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on A') ∧ A = ⋃ n, A' n := by
refine
⟨fun n => A ∩ disjointed s n, fun n => hA.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hm _), fun n =>
inter_subset_right.trans (disjointed_subset _ _),
(disjoint_disjointed s).mono fun k l hkl => hkl.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_disjointed, univ_subset_iff.mp h'', inter_univ]
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable' (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, hδε⟩
rw [lt_tsub_iff_right, add_comm] at hδε
have : ∀ n, ∃ U ⊇ A n, IsOpen U ∧ μ U < μ (A n) + δ n := by
intro n
have H₁ : ∀ t, μ.restrict (s n) t = μ (t ∩ s n) := fun t => restrict_apply' (hm n)
have Ht : μ.restrict (s n) (A n) ≠ ∞ := by
rw [H₁]
exact ((measure_mono (inter_subset_left.trans (subset_iUnion A n))).trans_lt HA).ne
rcases (A n).exists_isOpen_lt_add Ht (δ0 n).ne' with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
rw [H₁, H₁, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (hAs _)] at hU
exact ⟨U ∩ s n, subset_inter hAU (hAs _), hUo.inter (h' n), hU⟩
choose U hAU hUo hU using this
refine ⟨⋃ n, U n, iUnion_mono hAU, isOpen_iUnion hUo, ?_⟩
calc
μ (⋃ n, U n) ≤ ∑' n, μ (U n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (μ (A n) + δ n) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => (hU n).le
_ = ∑' n, μ (A n) + ∑' n, δ n := ENNReal.tsum_add
_ = μ (⋃ n, A n) + ∑' n, δ n := (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (measure_iUnion hAd hAm).symm rfl)
_ < r := hδε
/-- See also `IsCompact.measure_closure` for a version
that assumes the `σ`-algebra to be the Borel `σ`-algebra but makes no assumptions on `μ`. -/
lemma measure_closure_eq_of_isCompact [R1Space α] [OuterRegular μ]
{k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k) : μ (closure k) = μ k := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (measure_mono subset_closure)
simp only [measure_eq_iInf_isOpen k, le_iInf_iff]
intro u ku u_open
exact measure_mono (hk.closure_subset_of_isOpen u_open ku)
end OuterRegular
/-- If a measure `μ` admits finite spanning open sets such that the restriction of `μ` to each set
is outer regular, then the original measure is outer regular as well. -/
protected theorem FiniteSpanningSetsIn.outerRegular [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
(s : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn { U | IsOpen U ∧ OuterRegular (μ.restrict U) }) :
OuterRegular μ :=
OuterRegular.of_restrict (s := fun n ↦ s.set n) (fun n ↦ (s.set_mem n).2)
(fun n ↦ (s.set_mem n).1) s.spanning.symm.subset
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.outer_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.outerRegular
namespace InnerRegularWRT
variable {p q : Set α → Prop} {U s : Set α} {ε r : ℝ≥0∞}
/-- If a measure is inner regular (using closed or compact sets) for open sets, then every
measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a (closed or compact) subset. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_isOpen [OuterRegular μ] (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p IsOpen)
(hd : ∀ ⦃s U⦄, p s → IsOpen U → p (s \ U)) :
InnerRegularWRT μ p fun s => MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞ := by
rintro s ⟨hs, hμs⟩ r hr
have h0 : p ∅ := by
have : 0 < μ univ := (bot_le.trans_lt hr).trans_le (measure_mono (subset_univ _))
obtain ⟨K, -, hK, -⟩ : ∃ K, K ⊆ univ ∧ p K ∧ 0 < μ K := H isOpen_univ _ this
simpa using hd hK isOpen_univ
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hεs, rfl⟩ : ∃ ε ≠ 0, ε + ε ≤ μ s ∧ r = μ s - (ε + ε) := by
use (μ s - r) / 2
simp [*, hr.le, ENNReal.add_halves, ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel, le_add_right, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le]
rcases hs.exists_isOpen_diff_lt hμs hε with ⟨U, hsU, hUo, hUt, hμU⟩
rcases (U \ s).exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ hμU with ⟨U', hsU', hU'o, hμU'⟩
replace hsU' := diff_subset_comm.1 hsU'
rcases H.exists_subset_lt_add h0 hUo hUt.ne hε with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hKr⟩
refine ⟨K \ U', fun x hx => hsU' ⟨hKU hx.1, hx.2⟩, hd hKc hU'o, ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add hεs ?_⟩
calc
μ s ≤ μ U := μ.mono hsU
_ < μ K + ε := hKr
_ ≤ μ (K \ U') + μ U' + ε := add_le_add_right (tsub_le_iff_right.1 le_measure_diff) _
_ ≤ μ (K \ U') + ε + ε := by gcongr
_ = μ (K \ U') + (ε + ε) := add_assoc _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.measurable_set_of_open MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.measurableSet_of_isOpen
open Finset in
/-- In a finite measure space, assume that any open set can be approximated from inside by closed
sets. Then the measure is weakly regular. -/
theorem weaklyRegular_of_finite [BorelSpace α] (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen) : WeaklyRegular μ := by
have hfin : ∀ {s}, μ s ≠ ∞ := @(measure_ne_top μ)
suffices ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → ∀ ε, ε ≠ 0 → ∃ F, F ⊆ s ∧ ∃ U, U ⊇ s ∧
IsClosed F ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ s ≤ μ F + ε ∧ μ U ≤ μ s + ε by
refine
{ outerRegular := fun s hs r hr => ?_
innerRegular := H }
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hsr', hr'r⟩
rcases this s hs _ (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hsr').ne' with ⟨-, -, U, hsU, -, hUo, -, H⟩
refine ⟨U, hsU, hUo, ?_⟩
rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le hsr'.le] at H
exact H.trans_lt hr'r
apply MeasurableSet.induction_on_open
/- The proof is by measurable induction: we should check that the property is true for the empty
set, for open sets, and is stable by taking the complement and by taking countable disjoint
unions. The point of the property we are proving is that it is stable by taking complements
(exchanging the roles of closed and open sets and thanks to the finiteness of the measure). -/
-- check for open set
· intro U hU ε hε
rcases H.exists_subset_lt_add isClosed_empty hU hfin hε with ⟨F, hsF, hFc, hF⟩
exact ⟨F, hsF, U, Subset.rfl, hFc, hU, hF.le, le_self_add⟩
-- check for complements
· rintro s hs H ε hε
rcases H ε hε with ⟨F, hFs, U, hsU, hFc, hUo, hF, hU⟩
refine
⟨Uᶜ, compl_subset_compl.2 hsU, Fᶜ, compl_subset_compl.2 hFs, hUo.isClosed_compl,
hFc.isOpen_compl, ?_⟩
simp only [measure_compl_le_add_iff, *, hUo.measurableSet, hFc.measurableSet, true_and_iff]
-- check for disjoint unions
· intro s hsd hsm H ε ε0
have ε0' : ε / 2 ≠ 0 := (ENNReal.half_pos ε0).ne'
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable' ε0' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, hδε⟩
choose F hFs U hsU hFc hUo hF hU using fun n => H n (δ n) (δ0 n).ne'
-- the approximating closed set is constructed by considering finitely many sets `s i`, which
-- cover all the measure up to `ε/2`, approximating each of these by a closed set `F i`, and
-- taking the union of these (finitely many) `F i`.
have : Tendsto (fun t => (∑ k ∈ t, μ (s k)) + ε / 2) atTop (𝓝 <| μ (⋃ n, s n) + ε / 2) := by
rw [measure_iUnion hsd hsm]
exact Tendsto.add ENNReal.summable.hasSum tendsto_const_nhds
rcases (this.eventually <| lt_mem_nhds <| ENNReal.lt_add_right hfin ε0').exists with ⟨t, ht⟩
-- the approximating open set is constructed by taking for each `s n` an approximating open set
-- `U n` with measure at most `μ (s n) + δ n` for a summable `δ`, and taking the union of these.
refine
⟨⋃ k ∈ t, F k, iUnion_mono fun k => iUnion_subset fun _ => hFs _, ⋃ n, U n, iUnion_mono hsU,
isClosed_biUnion_finset fun k _ => hFc k, isOpen_iUnion hUo, ht.le.trans ?_, ?_⟩
· calc
(∑ k ∈ t, μ (s k)) + ε / 2 ≤ ((∑ k ∈ t, μ (F k)) + ∑ k ∈ t, δ k) + ε / 2 := by
rw [← sum_add_distrib]
gcongr
apply hF
_ ≤ (∑ k ∈ t, μ (F k)) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := by
gcongr
exact (ENNReal.sum_le_tsum _).trans hδε.le
_ = μ (⋃ k ∈ t, F k) + ε := by
rw [measure_biUnion_finset, add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
exacts [fun k _ n _ hkn => (hsd hkn).mono (hFs k) (hFs n),
fun k _ => (hFc k).measurableSet]
· calc
μ (⋃ n, U n) ≤ ∑' n, μ (U n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (μ (s n) + δ n) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum hU
_ = μ (⋃ n, s n) + ∑' n, δ n := by rw [measure_iUnion hsd hsm, ENNReal.tsum_add]
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n, s n) + ε := add_le_add_left (hδε.le.trans ENNReal.half_le_self) _
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.weakly_regular_of_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.weaklyRegular_of_finite
/-- If the restrictions of a measure to a monotone sequence of sets covering the space are
inner regular for some property `p` and all measurable sets, then the measure itself is
inner regular. -/
lemma of_restrict {μ : Measure α} {s : ℕ → Set α}
(h : ∀ n, InnerRegularWRT (μ.restrict (s n)) p MeasurableSet)
(hs : univ ⊆ ⋃ n, s n) (hmono : Monotone s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p MeasurableSet := by
intro F hF r hr
have hBU : ⋃ n, F ∩ s n = F := by rw [← inter_iUnion, univ_subset_iff.mp hs, inter_univ]
have : μ F = ⨆ n, μ (F ∩ s n) := by
rw [← measure_iUnion_eq_iSup, hBU]
exact Monotone.directed_le fun m n h ↦ inter_subset_inter_right _ (hmono h)
rw [this] at hr
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩
rw [← restrict_apply hF] at hn
rcases h n hF _ hn with ⟨K, KF, hKp, hK⟩
exact ⟨K, KF, hKp, hK.trans_le (restrict_apply_le _ _)⟩
/-- In a metrizable space (or even a pseudo metrizable space), an open set can be approximated from
inside by closed sets. -/
theorem of_pseudoMetrizableSpace {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [PseudoMetrizableSpace X]
[MeasurableSpace X] (μ : Measure X) : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen := by
let A : PseudoMetricSpace X := TopologicalSpace.pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric X
intro U hU r hr
rcases hU.exists_iUnion_isClosed with ⟨F, F_closed, -, rfl, F_mono⟩
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup F_mono.directed_le] at hr
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨F n, subset_iUnion _ _, F_closed n, hn⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.of_pseudo_emetric_space MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT.of_pseudoMetrizableSpace
/-- In a `σ`-compact space, any closed set can be approximated by a compact subset. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Regular.lean | 588 | 599 | theorem isCompact_isClosed {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [SigmaCompactSpace X]
[MeasurableSpace X] (μ : Measure X) : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact IsClosed := by |
intro F hF r hr
set B : ℕ → Set X := compactCovering X
have hBc : ∀ n, IsCompact (F ∩ B n) := fun n => (isCompact_compactCovering X n).inter_left hF
have hBU : ⋃ n, F ∩ B n = F := by rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_compactCovering, Set.inter_univ]
have : μ F = ⨆ n, μ (F ∩ B n) := by
rw [← measure_iUnion_eq_iSup, hBU]
exact Monotone.directed_le fun m n h => inter_subset_inter_right _ (compactCovering_subset _ h)
rw [this] at hr
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨_, inter_subset_left, hBc n, hn⟩
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.