Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.EqLocus
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Idempotents
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
#align_import linear_algebra.span from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10878f6bf1dab863445907ab23fbfcefcb5845d0"
/-!
# The span of a set of vectors, as a submodule
* `Submodule.span s` is defined to be the smallest submodule containing the set `s`.
## Notations
* We introduce the notation `R ∙ v` for the span of a singleton, `Submodule.span R {v}`. This is
`\span`, not the same as the scalar multiplication `•`/`\bub`.
-/
variable {R R₂ K M M₂ V S : Type*}
namespace Submodule
open Function Set
open Pointwise
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {x : M} (p p' : Submodule R M)
variable [Semiring R₂] {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
section
variable (R)
/-- The span of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest submodule of M that contains `s`. -/
def span (s : Set M) : Submodule R M :=
sInf { p | s ⊆ p }
#align submodule.span Submodule.span
variable {R}
-- Porting note: renamed field to `principal'` and added `principal` to fix explicit argument
/-- An `R`-submodule of `M` is principal if it is generated by one element. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsPrincipal (S : Submodule R M) : Prop where
principal' : ∃ a, S = span R {a}
#align submodule.is_principal Submodule.IsPrincipal
theorem IsPrincipal.principal (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] :
∃ a, S = span R {a} :=
Submodule.IsPrincipal.principal'
#align submodule.is_principal.principal Submodule.IsPrincipal.principal
end
variable {s t : Set M}
theorem mem_span : x ∈ span R s ↔ ∀ p : Submodule R M, s ⊆ p → x ∈ p :=
mem_iInter₂
#align submodule.mem_span Submodule.mem_span
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_span : s ⊆ span R s := fun _ h => mem_span.2 fun _ hp => hp h
#align submodule.subset_span Submodule.subset_span
theorem span_le {p} : span R s ≤ p ↔ s ⊆ p :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_span, fun ss _ h => mem_span.1 h _ ss⟩
#align submodule.span_le Submodule.span_le
theorem span_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : span R s ≤ span R t :=
span_le.2 <| Subset.trans h subset_span
#align submodule.span_mono Submodule.span_mono
theorem span_monotone : Monotone (span R : Set M → Submodule R M) := fun _ _ => span_mono
#align submodule.span_monotone Submodule.span_monotone
theorem span_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ p) (h₂ : p ≤ span R s) : span R s = p :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 h₁) h₂
#align submodule.span_eq_of_le Submodule.span_eq_of_le
theorem span_eq : span R (p : Set M) = p :=
span_eq_of_le _ (Subset.refl _) subset_span
#align submodule.span_eq Submodule.span_eq
theorem span_eq_span (hs : s ⊆ span R t) (ht : t ⊆ span R s) : span R s = span R t :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 hs) (span_le.2 ht)
#align submodule.span_eq_span Submodule.span_eq_span
/-- A version of `Submodule.span_eq` for subobjects closed under addition and scalar multiplication
and containing zero. In general, this should not be used directly, but can be used to quickly
generate proofs for specific types of subobjects. -/
lemma coe_span_eq_self [SetLike S M] [AddSubmonoidClass S M] [SMulMemClass S R M] (s : S) :
(span R (s : Set M) : Set M) = s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ subset_span
let s' : Submodule R M :=
{ carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem }
exact span_le (p := s') |>.mpr le_rfl
/-- A version of `Submodule.span_eq` for when the span is by a smaller ring. -/
@[simp]
theorem span_coe_eq_restrictScalars [Semiring S] [SMul S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
span S (p : Set M) = p.restrictScalars S :=
span_eq (p.restrictScalars S)
#align submodule.span_coe_eq_restrict_scalars Submodule.span_coe_eq_restrictScalars
/-- A version of `Submodule.map_span_le` that does not require the `RingHomSurjective`
assumption. -/
theorem image_span_subset (f : F) (s : Set M) (N : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
f '' span R s ⊆ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, f m ∈ N := image_subset_iff.trans <| span_le (p := N.comap f)
theorem image_span_subset_span (f : F) (s : Set M) : f '' span R s ⊆ span R₂ (f '' s) :=
(image_span_subset f s _).2 fun x hx ↦ subset_span ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
theorem map_span [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (s : Set M) :
(span R s).map f = span R₂ (f '' s) :=
Eq.symm <| span_eq_of_le _ (Set.image_subset f subset_span) (image_span_subset_span f s)
#align submodule.map_span Submodule.map_span
alias _root_.LinearMap.map_span := Submodule.map_span
#align linear_map.map_span LinearMap.map_span
theorem map_span_le [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (s : Set M) (N : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (span R s) ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, f m ∈ N := image_span_subset f s N
#align submodule.map_span_le Submodule.map_span_le
alias _root_.LinearMap.map_span_le := Submodule.map_span_le
#align linear_map.map_span_le LinearMap.map_span_le
@[simp]
theorem span_insert_zero : span R (insert (0 : M) s) = span R s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_mono (Set.subset_insert 0 s))
rw [span_le, Set.insert_subset_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem], Submodule.subset_span⟩
#align submodule.span_insert_zero Submodule.span_insert_zero
-- See also `span_preimage_eq` below.
theorem span_preimage_le (f : F) (s : Set M₂) :
span R (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (span R₂ s).comap f := by
rw [span_le, comap_coe]
exact preimage_mono subset_span
#align submodule.span_preimage_le Submodule.span_preimage_le
alias _root_.LinearMap.span_preimage_le := Submodule.span_preimage_le
#align linear_map.span_preimage_le LinearMap.span_preimage_le
theorem closure_subset_span {s : Set M} : (AddSubmonoid.closure s : Set M) ⊆ span R s :=
(@AddSubmonoid.closure_le _ _ _ (span R s).toAddSubmonoid).mpr subset_span
#align submodule.closure_subset_span Submodule.closure_subset_span
theorem closure_le_toAddSubmonoid_span {s : Set M} :
AddSubmonoid.closure s ≤ (span R s).toAddSubmonoid :=
closure_subset_span
#align submodule.closure_le_to_add_submonoid_span Submodule.closure_le_toAddSubmonoid_span
@[simp]
theorem span_closure {s : Set M} : span R (AddSubmonoid.closure s : Set M) = span R s :=
le_antisymm (span_le.mpr closure_subset_span) (span_mono AddSubmonoid.subset_closure)
#align submodule.span_closure Submodule.span_closure
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for 0 and all elements of `s`, and is
preserved under addition and scalar multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements of the span of
`s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem span_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (zero : p 0)
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) (smul : ∀ (a : R) (x), p x → p (a • x)) : p x :=
((@span_le (p := ⟨⟨⟨p, by intros x y; exact add x y⟩, zero⟩, smul⟩)) s).2 mem h
#align submodule.span_induction Submodule.span_induction
/-- An induction principle for span membership. This is a version of `Submodule.span_induction`
for binary predicates. -/
theorem span_induction₂ {p : M → M → Prop} {a b : M} (ha : a ∈ Submodule.span R s)
(hb : b ∈ Submodule.span R s) (mem_mem : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, p x y)
(zero_left : ∀ y, p 0 y) (zero_right : ∀ x, p x 0)
(add_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ + x₂) y)
(add_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ + y₂))
(smul_left : ∀ (r : R) x y, p x y → p (r • x) y)
(smul_right : ∀ (r : R) x y, p x y → p x (r • y)) : p a b :=
Submodule.span_induction ha
(fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction hb (mem_mem x hx) (zero_right x) (add_right x) fun r =>
smul_right r x)
(zero_left b) (fun x₁ x₂ => add_left x₁ x₂ b) fun r x => smul_left r x b
/-- A dependent version of `Submodule.span_induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem span_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ span R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_span h))
(zero : p 0 (Submodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul : ∀ (a : R) (x hx), p x hx → p (a • x) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ‹_›)) {x}
(hx : x ∈ span R s) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ span R s) (hc : p x hx) => hc
refine
span_induction hx (fun m hm => ⟨subset_span hm, mem m hm⟩) ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
(fun x y hx hy =>
Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx =>
Exists.elim hy fun hy' hy => ⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
fun r x hx => Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx => ⟨smul_mem _ _ hx', smul r _ _ hx⟩
#align submodule.span_induction' Submodule.span_induction'
open AddSubmonoid in
theorem span_eq_closure {s : Set M} : (span R s).toAddSubmonoid = closure (@univ R • s) := by
refine le_antisymm
(fun x hx ↦ span_induction hx (fun x hx ↦ subset_closure ⟨1, trivial, x, hx, one_smul R x⟩)
(zero_mem _) (fun _ _ ↦ add_mem) fun r m hm ↦ closure_induction hm ?_ ?_ fun _ _ h h' ↦ ?_)
(closure_le.2 ?_)
· rintro _ ⟨r, -, m, hm, rfl⟩; exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hm)
· rintro _ ⟨r', -, m, hm, rfl⟩; exact subset_closure ⟨r * r', trivial, m, hm, mul_smul r r' m⟩
· rw [smul_zero]; apply zero_mem
· rw [smul_add]; exact add_mem h h'
/-- A variant of `span_induction` that combines `∀ x ∈ s, p x` and `∀ r x, p x → p (r • x)`
into a single condition `∀ r, ∀ x ∈ s, p (r • x)`, which can be easier to verify. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s) (zero : p 0)
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) (smul_mem : ∀ r : R, ∀ x ∈ s, p (r • x)) : p x := by
rw [← mem_toAddSubmonoid, span_eq_closure] at h
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_induction h ?_ zero add
rintro _ ⟨r, -, m, hm, rfl⟩
exact smul_mem r m hm
/-- A dependent version of `Submodule.closure_induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ span R s → Prop}
(zero : p 0 (Submodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul_mem : ∀ (r x) (h : x ∈ s), p (r • x) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ <| subset_span h)) {x}
(hx : x ∈ span R s) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ span R s) (hc : p x hx) ↦ hc
refine closure_induction hx ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
(fun x y hx hy ↦ Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx ↦
Exists.elim hy fun hy' hy ↦ ⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
fun r x hx ↦ ⟨Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hx), smul_mem r x hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem span_span_coe_preimage : span R (((↑) : span R s → M) ⁻¹' s) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x ↦ Subtype.recOn x fun x hx _ ↦ by
refine span_induction' (p := fun x hx ↦ (⟨x, hx⟩ : span R s) ∈ span R (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s))
(fun x' hx' ↦ subset_span hx') ?_ (fun x _ y _ ↦ ?_) (fun r x _ ↦ ?_) hx
· exact zero_mem _
· exact add_mem
· exact smul_mem _ _
#align submodule.span_span_coe_preimage Submodule.span_span_coe_preimage
@[simp]
lemma span_setOf_mem_eq_top :
span R {x : span R s | (x : M) ∈ s} = ⊤ :=
span_span_coe_preimage
theorem span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure (s : Set M) :
(span ℕ s).toAddSubmonoid = AddSubmonoid.closure s := by
refine Eq.symm (AddSubmonoid.closure_eq_of_le subset_span ?_)
apply (OrderIso.to_galoisConnection (AddSubmonoid.toNatSubmodule (M := M)).symm).l_le
(a := span ℕ s) (b := AddSubmonoid.closure s)
rw [span_le]
exact AddSubmonoid.subset_closure
#align submodule.span_nat_eq_add_submonoid_closure Submodule.span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure
@[simp]
theorem span_nat_eq (s : AddSubmonoid M) : (span ℕ (s : Set M)).toAddSubmonoid = s := by
rw [span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure, s.closure_eq]
#align submodule.span_nat_eq Submodule.span_nat_eq
theorem span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (s : Set M) :
(span ℤ s).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.closure s :=
Eq.symm <|
AddSubgroup.closure_eq_of_le _ subset_span fun x hx =>
span_induction hx (fun x hx => AddSubgroup.subset_closure hx) (AddSubgroup.zero_mem _)
(fun _ _ => AddSubgroup.add_mem _) fun _ _ _ => AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem _ ‹_› _
#align submodule.span_int_eq_add_subgroup_closure Submodule.span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure
@[simp]
theorem span_int_eq {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (s : AddSubgroup M) :
(span ℤ (s : Set M)).toAddSubgroup = s := by rw [span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure, s.closure_eq]
#align submodule.span_int_eq Submodule.span_int_eq
section
variable (R M)
/-- `span` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from submodule to set. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@span R M _ _ _) (↑) where
choice s _ := span R s
gc _ _ := span_le
le_l_u _ := subset_span
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align submodule.gi Submodule.gi
end
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : span R (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_bot
#align submodule.span_empty Submodule.span_empty
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : span R (univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 <| subset_span
#align submodule.span_univ Submodule.span_univ
theorem span_union (s t : Set M) : span R (s ∪ t) = span R s ⊔ span R t :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_sup
#align submodule.span_union Submodule.span_union
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : span R (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, span R (s i) :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_iSup
#align submodule.span_Union Submodule.span_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem span_iUnion₂ {ι} {κ : ι → Sort*} (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set M) :
span R (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⨆ (i) (j), span R (s i j) :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_iSup₂
#align submodule.span_Union₂ Submodule.span_iUnion₂
theorem span_attach_biUnion [DecidableEq M] {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : s → Finset M) :
span R (s.attach.biUnion f : Set M) = ⨆ x, span R (f x) := by simp [span_iUnion]
#align submodule.span_attach_bUnion Submodule.span_attach_biUnion
theorem sup_span : p ⊔ span R s = span R (p ∪ s) := by rw [Submodule.span_union, p.span_eq]
#align submodule.sup_span Submodule.sup_span
theorem span_sup : span R s ⊔ p = span R (s ∪ p) := by rw [Submodule.span_union, p.span_eq]
#align submodule.span_sup Submodule.span_sup
notation:1000
/- Note that the character `∙` U+2219 used below is different from the scalar multiplication
character `•` U+2022. -/
R " ∙ " x => span R (singleton x)
theorem span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans (s : Set M) : span R s = ⨆ x ∈ s, R ∙ x := by
simp only [← span_iUnion, Set.biUnion_of_singleton s]
#align submodule.span_eq_supr_of_singleton_spans Submodule.span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans
theorem span_range_eq_iSup {ι : Sort*} {v : ι → M} : span R (range v) = ⨆ i, R ∙ v i := by
rw [span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans, iSup_range]
#align submodule.span_range_eq_supr Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup
theorem span_smul_le (s : Set M) (r : R) : span R (r • s) ≤ span R s := by
rw [span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact smul_mem (span R s) r (subset_span hx)
#align submodule.span_smul_le Submodule.span_smul_le
theorem subset_span_trans {U V W : Set M} (hUV : U ⊆ Submodule.span R V)
(hVW : V ⊆ Submodule.span R W) : U ⊆ Submodule.span R W :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.le_u_l_trans hUV hVW
#align submodule.subset_span_trans Submodule.subset_span_trans
/-- See `Submodule.span_smul_eq` (in `RingTheory.Ideal.Operations`) for
`span R (r • s) = r • span R s` that holds for arbitrary `r` in a `CommSemiring`. -/
theorem span_smul_eq_of_isUnit (s : Set M) (r : R) (hr : IsUnit r) : span R (r • s) = span R s := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply span_smul_le
· convert span_smul_le (r • s) ((hr.unit⁻¹ : _) : R)
rw [smul_smul]
erw [hr.unit.inv_val]
rw [one_smul]
#align submodule.span_smul_eq_of_is_unit Submodule.span_smul_eq_of_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] (S : ι → Submodule R M)
(H : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) : ((iSup S: Submodule R M) : Set M) = ⋃ i, S i :=
let s : Submodule R M :=
{ __ := AddSubmonoid.copy _ _ (AddSubmonoid.coe_iSup_of_directed H).symm
smul_mem' := fun r _ hx ↦ have ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp hx
Set.mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨i, (S i).smul_mem' r hi⟩ }
have : iSup S = s := le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i ↦ le_iSup (fun i ↦ (S i : Set M)) i) (Set.iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ le_iSup S _)
this.symm ▸ rfl
#align submodule.coe_supr_of_directed Submodule.coe_iSup_of_directed
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] (S : ι → Submodule R M) (H : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) {x} :
x ∈ iSup S ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup_of_directed S H, mem_iUnion]
rfl
#align submodule.mem_supr_of_directed Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed
theorem mem_sSup_of_directed {s : Set (Submodule R M)} {z} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) : z ∈ sSup s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, z ∈ y := by
have : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed _ hdir.directed_val, SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk,
exists_prop]
#align submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed Submodule.mem_sSup_of_directed
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_iSup_of_chain (a : ℕ →o Submodule R M) : (↑(⨆ k, a k) : Set M) = ⋃ k, (a k : Set M) :=
coe_iSup_of_directed a a.monotone.directed_le
#align submodule.coe_supr_of_chain Submodule.coe_iSup_of_chain
/-- We can regard `coe_iSup_of_chain` as the statement that `(↑) : (Submodule R M) → Set M` is
Scott continuous for the ω-complete partial order induced by the complete lattice structures. -/
theorem coe_scott_continuous :
OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous' ((↑) : Submodule R M → Set M) :=
⟨SetLike.coe_mono, coe_iSup_of_chain⟩
#align submodule.coe_scott_continuous Submodule.coe_scott_continuous
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_of_chain (a : ℕ →o Submodule R M) (m : M) : (m ∈ ⨆ k, a k) ↔ ∃ k, m ∈ a k :=
mem_iSup_of_directed a a.monotone.directed_le
#align submodule.mem_supr_of_chain Submodule.mem_iSup_of_chain
section
variable {p p'}
theorem mem_sup : x ∈ p ⊔ p' ↔ ∃ y ∈ p, ∃ z ∈ p', y + z = x :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← span_eq p, ← span_eq p', ← span_union] at h
refine span_induction h ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro y (h | h)
· exact ⟨y, h, 0, by simp, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨0, by simp, y, h, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨0, by simp, 0, by simp⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨y₁, hy₁, z₁, hz₁, rfl⟩ ⟨y₂, hy₂, z₂, hz₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, add_mem hy₁ hy₂, _, add_mem hz₁ hz₂, by
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, ← add_assoc y₂, ← add_assoc z₁, add_comm y₂]⟩
· rintro a _ ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, smul_mem _ a hy, _, smul_mem _ a hz, by simp [smul_add]⟩, by
rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
exact add_mem ((le_sup_left : p ≤ p ⊔ p') hy) ((le_sup_right : p' ≤ p ⊔ p') hz)⟩
#align submodule.mem_sup Submodule.mem_sup
theorem mem_sup' : x ∈ p ⊔ p' ↔ ∃ (y : p) (z : p'), (y : M) + z = x :=
mem_sup.trans <| by simp only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
#align submodule.mem_sup' Submodule.mem_sup'
lemma exists_add_eq_of_codisjoint (h : Codisjoint p p') (x : M) :
∃ y ∈ p, ∃ z ∈ p', y + z = x := by
suffices x ∈ p ⊔ p' by exact Submodule.mem_sup.mp this
simpa only [h.eq_top] using Submodule.mem_top
variable (p p')
theorem coe_sup : ↑(p ⊔ p') = (p + p' : Set M) := by
ext
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_sup, Set.mem_add]
simp
#align submodule.coe_sup Submodule.coe_sup
theorem sup_toAddSubmonoid : (p ⊔ p').toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid ⊔ p'.toAddSubmonoid := by
ext x
rw [mem_toAddSubmonoid, mem_sup, AddSubmonoid.mem_sup]
rfl
#align submodule.sup_to_add_submonoid Submodule.sup_toAddSubmonoid
theorem sup_toAddSubgroup {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
(p p' : Submodule R M) : (p ⊔ p').toAddSubgroup = p.toAddSubgroup ⊔ p'.toAddSubgroup := by
ext x
rw [mem_toAddSubgroup, mem_sup, AddSubgroup.mem_sup]
rfl
#align submodule.sup_to_add_subgroup Submodule.sup_toAddSubgroup
end
theorem mem_span_singleton_self (x : M) : x ∈ R ∙ x :=
subset_span rfl
#align submodule.mem_span_singleton_self Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self
theorem nontrivial_span_singleton {x : M} (h : x ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (R ∙ x) :=
⟨by
use 0, ⟨x, Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x⟩
intro H
rw [eq_comm, Submodule.mk_eq_zero] at H
exact h H⟩
#align submodule.nontrivial_span_singleton Submodule.nontrivial_span_singleton
theorem mem_span_singleton {y : M} : (x ∈ R ∙ y) ↔ ∃ a : R, a • y = x :=
⟨fun h => by
refine span_induction h ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro y (rfl | ⟨⟨_⟩⟩)
exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a + b, by simp [add_smul]⟩
· rintro a _ ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a * b, by simp [smul_smul]⟩, by
rintro ⟨a, y, rfl⟩; exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span <| by simp)⟩
#align submodule.mem_span_singleton Submodule.mem_span_singleton
theorem le_span_singleton_iff {s : Submodule R M} {v₀ : M} :
(s ≤ R ∙ v₀) ↔ ∀ v ∈ s, ∃ r : R, r • v₀ = v := by simp_rw [SetLike.le_def, mem_span_singleton]
#align submodule.le_span_singleton_iff Submodule.le_span_singleton_iff
variable (R)
theorem span_singleton_eq_top_iff (x : M) : (R ∙ x) = ⊤ ↔ ∀ v, ∃ r : R, r • x = v := by
rw [eq_top_iff, le_span_singleton_iff]
tauto
#align submodule.span_singleton_eq_top_iff Submodule.span_singleton_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem span_zero_singleton : (R ∙ (0 : M)) = ⊥ := by
ext
simp [mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
#align submodule.span_zero_singleton Submodule.span_zero_singleton
theorem span_singleton_eq_range (y : M) : ↑(R ∙ y) = range ((· • y) : R → M) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_span_singleton
#align submodule.span_singleton_eq_range Submodule.span_singleton_eq_range
theorem span_singleton_smul_le {S} [Monoid S] [SMul S R] [MulAction S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
(r : S) (x : M) : (R ∙ r • x) ≤ R ∙ x := by
rw [span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact smul_of_tower_mem _ _ (mem_span_singleton_self _)
#align submodule.span_singleton_smul_le Submodule.span_singleton_smul_le
theorem span_singleton_group_smul_eq {G} [Group G] [SMul G R] [MulAction G M] [IsScalarTower G R M]
(g : G) (x : M) : (R ∙ g • x) = R ∙ x := by
refine le_antisymm (span_singleton_smul_le R g x) ?_
convert span_singleton_smul_le R g⁻¹ (g • x)
exact (inv_smul_smul g x).symm
#align submodule.span_singleton_group_smul_eq Submodule.span_singleton_group_smul_eq
variable {R}
theorem span_singleton_smul_eq {r : R} (hr : IsUnit r) (x : M) : (R ∙ r • x) = R ∙ x := by
lift r to Rˣ using hr
rw [← Units.smul_def]
exact span_singleton_group_smul_eq R r x
#align submodule.span_singleton_smul_eq Submodule.span_singleton_smul_eq
theorem disjoint_span_singleton {K E : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E]
{s : Submodule K E} {x : E} : Disjoint s (K ∙ x) ↔ x ∈ s → x = 0 := by
refine disjoint_def.trans ⟨fun H hx => H x hx <| subset_span <| mem_singleton x, ?_⟩
intro H y hy hyx
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hyx
by_cases hc : c = 0
· rw [hc, zero_smul]
· rw [s.smul_mem_iff hc] at hy
rw [H hy, smul_zero]
#align submodule.disjoint_span_singleton Submodule.disjoint_span_singleton
theorem disjoint_span_singleton' {K E : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E]
{p : Submodule K E} {x : E} (x0 : x ≠ 0) : Disjoint p (K ∙ x) ↔ x ∉ p :=
disjoint_span_singleton.trans ⟨fun h₁ h₂ => x0 (h₁ h₂), fun h₁ h₂ => (h₁ h₂).elim⟩
#align submodule.disjoint_span_singleton' Submodule.disjoint_span_singleton'
theorem mem_span_singleton_trans {x y z : M} (hxy : x ∈ R ∙ y) (hyz : y ∈ R ∙ z) : x ∈ R ∙ z := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← singleton_subset_iff] at *
exact Submodule.subset_span_trans hxy hyz
#align submodule.mem_span_singleton_trans Submodule.mem_span_singleton_trans
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Span.lean | 561 | 562 | theorem span_insert (x) (s : Set M) : span R (insert x s) = (R ∙ x) ⊔ span R s := by |
rw [insert_eq, span_union]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.BalancedCoreHull
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformGroup
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
#align_import analysis.locally_convex.bounded from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Von Neumann Boundedness
This file defines natural or von Neumann bounded sets and proves elementary properties.
## Main declarations
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded`: A set `s` is von Neumann-bounded if every neighborhood of zero
absorbs `s`.
* `Bornology.vonNBornology`: The bornology made of the von Neumann-bounded sets.
## Main results
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le`: A coarser topology admits more
von Neumann-bounded sets.
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.image`: A continuous linear image of a bounded set is bounded.
* `Bornology.isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero`: Given any sequence `ε` of scalars which tends
to `𝓝[≠] 0`, we have that a set `S` is bounded if and only if for any sequence `x : ℕ → S`,
`ε • x` tends to 0. This shows that bounded sets are completely determined by sequences, which is
the key fact for proving that sequential continuity implies continuity for linear maps defined on
a bornological space
## References
* [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
-/
variable {𝕜 𝕜' E E' F ι : Type*}
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Topology Pointwise
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
namespace Bornology
section SeminormedRing
section Zero
variable (𝕜)
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Zero E]
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
/-- A set `s` is von Neumann bounded if every neighborhood of 0 absorbs `s`. -/
def IsVonNBounded (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃V⦄, V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E) → Absorbs 𝕜 V s
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded Bornology.IsVonNBounded
variable (E)
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_empty : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) := fun _ _ => Absorbs.empty
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded_empty Bornology.isVonNBounded_empty
variable {𝕜 E}
theorem isVonNBounded_iff (s : Set E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E), Absorbs 𝕜 V s :=
Iff.rfl
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded_iff Bornology.isVonNBounded_iff
theorem _root_.Filter.HasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff {q : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set E} {A : Set E}
(h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis q s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 A ↔ ∀ i, q i → Absorbs 𝕜 (s i) A := by
refine ⟨fun hA i hi => hA (h.mem_of_mem hi), fun hA V hV => ?_⟩
rcases h.mem_iff.mp hV with ⟨i, hi, hV⟩
exact (hA i hi).mono_left hV
#align filter.has_basis.is_vonN_bounded_basis_iff Filter.HasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-12")]
alias _root_.Filter.HasBasis.isVonNBounded_basis_iff := Filter.HasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff
/-- Subsets of bounded sets are bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.subset {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁ := fun _ hV => (hs₂ hV).mono_right h
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded.subset Bornology.IsVonNBounded.subset
/-- The union of two bounded sets is bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.union {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (hs₁ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s₁ ∪ s₂) := fun _ hV => (hs₁ hV).union (hs₂ hV)
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded.union Bornology.IsVonNBounded.union
end Zero
section ContinuousAdd
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddZeroClass E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.add (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (ht : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t) := fun U hU ↦ by
rcases exists_open_nhds_zero_add_subset hU with ⟨V, hVo, hV, hVU⟩
exact ((hs <| hVo.mem_nhds hV).add (ht <| hVo.mem_nhds hV)).mono_left hVU
end ContinuousAdd
section TopologicalAddGroup
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalAddGroup E]
[DistribMulAction 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.neg (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (-s) := fun U hU ↦ by
rw [← neg_neg U]
exact (hs <| neg_mem_nhds_zero _ hU).neg_neg
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_neg : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (-s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg s ▸ h.neg, fun h ↦ h.neg⟩
alias ⟨IsVonNBounded.of_neg, _⟩ := isVonNBounded_neg
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.sub (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (ht : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hs.add ht.neg
end TopologicalAddGroup
end SeminormedRing
section MultipleTopologies
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- If a topology `t'` is coarser than `t`, then any set `s` that is bounded with respect to
`t` is bounded with respect to `t'`. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le {t t' : TopologicalSpace E} (h : t ≤ t') {s : Set E}
(hs : @IsVonNBounded 𝕜 E _ _ _ t s) : @IsVonNBounded 𝕜 E _ _ _ t' s := fun _ hV =>
hs <| (le_iff_nhds t t').mp h 0 hV
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded.of_topological_space_le Bornology.IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le
end MultipleTopologies
lemma isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds {𝕜 E : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ Tendsto (· • S : 𝕜 → Set E) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0).smallSets := by
rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun V hV ↦ ?_
simp only [absorbs_iff_eventually_nhds_zero (mem_of_mem_nhds hV), mapsTo', image_smul]
alias ⟨IsVonNBounded.tendsto_smallSets_nhds, _⟩ := isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds
lemma isVonNBounded_pi_iff {𝕜 ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[∀ i, AddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, Module 𝕜 (E i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (E i)]
{S : Set (∀ i, E i)} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ ∀ i, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (eval i '' S) := by
simp_rw [isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, smallSets_iInf,
smallSets_comap_eq_comap_image, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp,
← image_smul, image_image]; rfl
section Image
variable {𝕜₁ 𝕜₂ : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜₁] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E]
[Module 𝕜₁ E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A continuous linear image of a bounded set is bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.image {σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomSurjective σ] [RingHomIsometric σ] {s : Set E}
(hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜₁ s) (f : E →SL[σ] F) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜₂ (f '' s) := by
have σ_iso : Isometry σ := AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm σ fun x => RingHomIsometric.is_iso
have : map σ (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 0 := by
rw [σ_iso.embedding.map_nhds_eq, σ.surjective.range_eq, nhdsWithin_univ, map_zero]
have hf₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) := f.continuous.tendsto' 0 0 (map_zero f)
simp only [isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds, ← this, tendsto_map'_iff] at hs ⊢
simpa only [comp_def, image_smul_setₛₗ _ _ σ f] using hf₀.image_smallSets.comp hs
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded.image Bornology.IsVonNBounded.image
end Image
section sequence
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕝] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
[Module 𝕝 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕝 E]
theorem IsVonNBounded.smul_tendsto_zero {S : Set E} {ε : ι → 𝕜} {x : ι → E} {l : Filter ι}
(hS : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S) (hxS : ∀ᶠ n in l, x n ∈ S) (hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0) :=
(hS.tendsto_smallSets_nhds.comp hε).of_smallSets <| hxS.mono fun _ ↦ smul_mem_smul_set
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded.smul_tendsto_zero Bornology.IsVonNBounded.smul_tendsto_zero
theorem isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero {ε : ι → 𝕝} {l : Filter ι} [l.NeBot]
(hε : ∀ᶠ n in l, ε n ≠ 0) {S : Set E}
(H : ∀ x : ι → E, (∀ n, x n ∈ S) → Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0)) : IsVonNBounded 𝕝 S := by
rw [(nhds_basis_balanced 𝕝 E).isVonNBounded_iff]
by_contra! H'
rcases H' with ⟨V, ⟨hV, hVb⟩, hVS⟩
have : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∃ x : S, ε n • (x : E) ∉ V := by
filter_upwards [hε] with n hn
rw [absorbs_iff_norm] at hVS
push_neg at hVS
rcases hVS ‖(ε n)⁻¹‖ with ⟨a, haε, haS⟩
rcases Set.not_subset.mp haS with ⟨x, hxS, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, hxS⟩, fun hnx => ?_⟩
rw [← Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ hn] at hnx
exact hx (hVb.smul_mono haε hnx)
rcases this.choice with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine Filter.frequently_false l (Filter.Eventually.frequently ?_)
filter_upwards [hx,
(H (_ ∘ x) fun n => (x n).2).eventually (eventually_mem_set.mpr hV)] using fun n => id
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero Bornology.isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero
/-- Given any sequence `ε` of scalars which tends to `𝓝[≠] 0`, we have that a set `S` is bounded
if and only if for any sequence `x : ℕ → S`, `ε • x` tends to 0. This actually works for any
indexing type `ι`, but in the special case `ι = ℕ` we get the important fact that convergent
sequences fully characterize bounded sets. -/
theorem isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero {ε : ι → 𝕝} {l : Filter ι} [l.NeBot]
(hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝[≠] 0)) {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕝 S ↔ ∀ x : ι → E, (∀ n, x n ∈ S) → Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun hS x hxS => hS.smul_tendsto_zero (eventually_of_forall hxS) (le_trans hε nhdsWithin_le_nhds),
isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero (by exact hε self_mem_nhdsWithin)⟩
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero Bornology.isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero
end sequence
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- Singletons are bounded. -/
theorem isVonNBounded_singleton (x : E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 ({x} : Set E) := fun _ hV =>
(absorbent_nhds_zero hV).absorbs
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded_singleton Bornology.isVonNBounded_singleton
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.vadd (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (x : E) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (x +ᵥ s) := by
rw [← singleton_vadd]
-- TODO: dot notation timeouts in the next line
exact IsVonNBounded.add (isVonNBounded_singleton x) hs
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_vadd (x : E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (x +ᵥ s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.vadd (-x), fun h ↦ h.vadd x⟩
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_add_right (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t)) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
(isVonNBounded_vadd x).mp <| hst.subset <| image_subset_image2_right hx
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_add_left (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t)) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
((add_comm s t).subst hst).of_add_right ht
theorem isVonNBounded_add_of_nonempty (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.of_add_left ht, h.of_add_right hs⟩, and_imp.2 IsVonNBounded.add⟩
theorem isVonNBounded_add :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t) ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ ∨ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs; · simp
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ht; · simp
simp [hs.ne_empty, ht.ne_empty, isVonNBounded_add_of_nonempty hs ht]
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_add_self : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs <;> simp [isVonNBounded_add_of_nonempty, *]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_sub_left (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t)) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
((sub_eq_add_neg s t).subst hst).of_add_left ht.neg
end ContinuousAdd
section TopologicalAddGroup
variable [TopologicalAddGroup E] {s t : Set E}
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_sub_right (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t)) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t :=
(((sub_eq_add_neg s t).subst hst).of_add_right hs).of_neg
theorem isVonNBounded_sub_of_nonempty (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, isVonNBounded_add_of_nonempty, hs, ht]
theorem isVonNBounded_sub :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t) ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ ∨ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, isVonNBounded_add]
end TopologicalAddGroup
/-- The union of all bounded set is the whole space. -/
theorem isVonNBounded_covers : ⋃₀ setOf (IsVonNBounded 𝕜) = (Set.univ : Set E) :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun x =>
Set.mem_sUnion.mpr ⟨{x}, isVonNBounded_singleton _, Set.mem_singleton _⟩
#align bornology.is_vonN_bounded_covers Bornology.isVonNBounded_covers
variable (𝕜 E)
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- The von Neumann bornology defined by the von Neumann bounded sets.
Note that this is not registered as an instance, in order to avoid diamonds with the
metric bornology. -/
abbrev vonNBornology : Bornology E :=
Bornology.ofBounded (setOf (IsVonNBounded 𝕜)) (isVonNBounded_empty 𝕜 E)
(fun _ hs _ ht => hs.subset ht) (fun _ hs _ => hs.union) isVonNBounded_singleton
#align bornology.vonN_bornology Bornology.vonNBornology
variable {E}
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_iff_isVonNBounded {s : Set E} :
@IsBounded _ (vonNBornology 𝕜 E) s ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
isBounded_ofBounded_iff _
#align bornology.is_bounded_iff_is_vonN_bounded Bornology.isBounded_iff_isVonNBounded
end NormedField
end Bornology
section UniformAddGroup
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [UniformSpace E] [UniformAddGroup E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem TotallyBounded.isVonNBounded {s : Set E} (hs : TotallyBounded s) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
rw [totallyBounded_iff_subset_finite_iUnion_nhds_zero] at hs
intro U hU
have h : Filter.Tendsto (fun x : E × E => x.fst + x.snd) (𝓝 (0, 0)) (𝓝 ((0 : E) + (0 : E))) :=
tendsto_add
rw [add_zero] at h
have h' := (nhds_basis_balanced 𝕜 E).prod (nhds_basis_balanced 𝕜 E)
simp_rw [← nhds_prod_eq, id] at h'
rcases h.basis_left h' U hU with ⟨x, hx, h''⟩
rcases hs x.snd hx.2.1 with ⟨t, ht, hs⟩
refine Absorbs.mono_right ?_ hs
rw [ht.absorbs_biUnion]
have hx_fstsnd : x.fst + x.snd ⊆ U := add_subset_iff.mpr fun z1 hz1 z2 hz2 ↦
h'' <| mk_mem_prod hz1 hz2
refine fun y _ => Absorbs.mono_left ?_ hx_fstsnd
-- TODO: with dot notation, Lean timeouts on the next line. Why?
exact Absorbent.vadd_absorbs (absorbent_nhds_zero hx.1.1) hx.2.2.absorbs_self
#align totally_bounded.is_vonN_bounded TotallyBounded.isVonNBounded
end UniformAddGroup
section VonNBornologyEqMetric
namespace NormedSpace
section NormedField
variable (𝕜)
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
theorem isVonNBounded_of_isBounded {s : Set E} (h : Bornology.IsBounded s) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
rcases h.subset_ball 0 with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [Metric.nhds_basis_ball.isVonNBounded_iff]
rw [← ball_normSeminorm 𝕜 E] at hr ⊢
exact fun ε hε ↦ ((normSeminorm 𝕜 E).ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hε).mono_right hr
variable (E)
theorem isVonNBounded_ball (r : ℝ) : Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (Metric.ball (0 : E) r) :=
isVonNBounded_of_isBounded _ Metric.isBounded_ball
#align normed_space.is_vonN_bounded_ball NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_ball
theorem isVonNBounded_closedBall (r : ℝ) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (Metric.closedBall (0 : E) r) :=
isVonNBounded_of_isBounded _ Metric.isBounded_closedBall
#align normed_space.is_vonN_bounded_closed_ball NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_closedBall
end NormedField
variable (𝕜)
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/Bounded.lean | 390 | 397 | theorem isVonNBounded_iff {s : Set E} : Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ Bornology.IsBounded s := by |
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, isVonNBounded_of_isBounded _⟩
rcases (h (Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 zero_lt_one)).exists_pos with ⟨ρ, hρ, hρball⟩
rcases NormedField.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 ρ with ⟨a, ha⟩
specialize hρball a ha.le
rw [← ball_normSeminorm 𝕜 E, Seminorm.smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hρ.trans ha),
ball_normSeminorm] at hρball
exact Metric.isBounded_ball.subset hρball
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 396 | 396 | theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
#align_import data.set.function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"996b0ff959da753a555053a480f36e5f264d4207"
/-!
# Functions over sets
## Main definitions
### Predicate
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
### Functions
* `Set.restrict f s` : restrict the domain of `f` to the set `s`;
* `Set.codRestrict f s h` : given `h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s`, restrict the codomain of `f` to the set `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo.restrict f s t h`: given `h : MapsTo f s t`, restrict the domain of `f` to `s`
and the codomain to `t`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Restrict -/
section restrict
/-- Restrict domain of a function `f` to a set `s`. Same as `Subtype.restrict` but this version
takes an argument `↥s` instead of `Subtype s`. -/
def restrict (s : Set α) (f : ∀ a : α, π a) : ∀ a : s, π a := fun x => f x
#align set.restrict Set.restrict
theorem restrict_eq (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s.restrict f = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_eq Set.restrict_eq
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : s) : s.restrict f x = f x :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_apply Set.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_eq_iff {f : ∀ a, π a} {s : Set α} {g : ∀ a : s, π a} :
restrict s f = g ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : a ∈ s), f a = g ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
funext_iff.trans Subtype.forall
#align set.restrict_eq_iff Set.restrict_eq_iff
theorem eq_restrict_iff {s : Set α} {f : ∀ a : s, π a} {g : ∀ a, π a} :
f = restrict s g ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : a ∈ s), f ⟨a, ha⟩ = g a :=
funext_iff.trans Subtype.forall
#align set.eq_restrict_iff Set.eq_restrict_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : Set.range (s.restrict f) = f '' s :=
(range_comp _ _).trans <| congr_arg (f '' ·) Subtype.range_coe
#align set.range_restrict Set.range_restrict
theorem image_restrict (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) :
s.restrict f '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = f '' (t ∩ s) := by
rw [restrict_eq, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.image_restrict Set.image_restrict
@[simp]
theorem restrict_dite {s : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β)
(g : ∀ a ∉ s, β) :
(s.restrict fun a => if h : a ∈ s then f a h else g a h) = (fun a : s => f a a.2) :=
funext fun a => dif_pos a.2
#align set.restrict_dite Set.restrict_dite
@[simp]
theorem restrict_dite_compl {s : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β)
(g : ∀ a ∉ s, β) :
(sᶜ.restrict fun a => if h : a ∈ s then f a h else g a h) = (fun a : (sᶜ : Set α) => g a a.2) :=
funext fun a => dif_neg a.2
#align set.restrict_dite_compl Set.restrict_dite_compl
@[simp]
theorem restrict_ite (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
(s.restrict fun a => if a ∈ s then f a else g a) = s.restrict f :=
restrict_dite _ _
#align set.restrict_ite Set.restrict_ite
@[simp]
theorem restrict_ite_compl (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
(sᶜ.restrict fun a => if a ∈ s then f a else g a) = sᶜ.restrict g :=
restrict_dite_compl _ _
#align set.restrict_ite_compl Set.restrict_ite_compl
@[simp]
theorem restrict_piecewise (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
s.restrict (piecewise s f g) = s.restrict f :=
restrict_ite _ _ _
#align set.restrict_piecewise Set.restrict_piecewise
@[simp]
theorem restrict_piecewise_compl (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
sᶜ.restrict (piecewise s f g) = sᶜ.restrict g :=
restrict_ite_compl _ _ _
#align set.restrict_piecewise_compl Set.restrict_piecewise_compl
theorem restrict_extend_range (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
(range f).restrict (extend f g g') = fun x => g x.coe_prop.choose := by
classical
exact restrict_dite _ _
#align set.restrict_extend_range Set.restrict_extend_range
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend_compl_range (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
(range f)ᶜ.restrict (extend f g g') = g' ∘ Subtype.val := by
classical
exact restrict_dite_compl _ _
#align set.restrict_extend_compl_range Set.restrict_extend_compl_range
theorem range_extend_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
range (extend f g g') ⊆ range g ∪ g' '' (range f)ᶜ := by
classical
rintro _ ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [extend_def]
split_ifs with h
exacts [Or.inl (mem_range_self _), Or.inr (mem_image_of_mem _ h)]
#align set.range_extend_subset Set.range_extend_subset
theorem range_extend {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
range (extend f g g') = range g ∪ g' '' (range f)ᶜ := by
refine (range_extend_subset _ _ _).antisymm ?_
rintro z (⟨x, rfl⟩ | ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨f x, hf.extend_apply _ _ _⟩, ⟨y, extend_apply' _ _ _ hy⟩]
#align set.range_extend Set.range_extend
/-- Restrict codomain of a function `f` to a set `s`. Same as `Subtype.coind` but this version
has codomain `↥s` instead of `Subtype s`. -/
def codRestrict (f : ι → α) (s : Set α) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : ι → s := fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩
#align set.cod_restrict Set.codRestrict
@[simp]
theorem val_codRestrict_apply (f : ι → α) (s : Set α) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) (x : ι) :
(codRestrict f s h x : α) = f x :=
rfl
#align set.coe_cod_restrict_apply Set.val_codRestrict_apply
@[simp]
theorem restrict_comp_codRestrict {f : ι → α} {g : α → β} {b : Set α} (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ b) :
b.restrict g ∘ b.codRestrict f h = g ∘ f :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_comp_cod_restrict Set.restrict_comp_codRestrict
@[simp]
theorem injective_codRestrict {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) :
Injective (codRestrict f s h) ↔ Injective f := by
simp only [Injective, Subtype.ext_iff, val_codRestrict_apply]
#align set.injective_cod_restrict Set.injective_codRestrict
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Injective.codRestrict⟩ := injective_codRestrict
#align function.injective.cod_restrict Function.Injective.codRestrict
end restrict
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
#align set.eq_on_empty Set.eqOn_empty
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
#align set.eq_on_singleton Set.eqOn_singleton
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_restrict_iff : restrict s f₁ = restrict s f₂ ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s :=
restrict_eq_iff
#align set.restrict_eq_restrict_iff Set.restrict_eq_restrict_iff
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
#align set.eq_on.symm Set.EqOn.symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on_comm Set.eqOn_comm
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
#align set.eq_on_refl Set.eqOn_refl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in mathlib4#7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
#align set.eq_on.trans Set.EqOn.trans
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
#align set.eq_on.image_eq Set.EqOn.image_eq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
theorem EqOn.inter_preimage_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (t : Set β) : s ∩ f₁ ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' t :=
ext fun x => and_congr_right_iff.2 fun hx => by rw [mem_preimage, mem_preimage, heq hx]
#align set.eq_on.inter_preimage_eq Set.EqOn.inter_preimage_eq
theorem EqOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ := fun _ hx => hf (hs hx)
#align set.eq_on.mono Set.EqOn.mono
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_union : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ ∧ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂ :=
forall₂_or_left
#align set.eq_on_union Set.eqOn_union
theorem EqOn.union (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁) (h₂ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
eqOn_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align set.eq_on.union Set.EqOn.union
theorem EqOn.comp_left (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) := fun _ ha =>
congr_arg _ <| h ha
#align set.eq_on.comp_left Set.EqOn.comp_left
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} {g₁ g₂ : α → β} :
EqOn g₁ g₂ (range f) ↔ g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f :=
forall_mem_range.trans <| funext_iff.symm
#align set.eq_on_range Set.eqOn_range
alias ⟨EqOn.comp_eq, _⟩ := eqOn_range
#align set.eq_on.comp_eq Set.EqOn.comp_eq
end equality
/-! ### Congruence lemmas for monotonicity and antitonicity -/
section Order
variable {s : Set α} {f₁ f₂ : α → β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.congr (h₁ : MonotoneOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : MonotoneOn f₂ s := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [← h ha, ← h hb]
exact h₁ ha hb hab
#align monotone_on.congr MonotoneOn.congr
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.congr (h₁ : AntitoneOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : AntitoneOn f₂ s :=
h₁.dual_right.congr h
#align antitone_on.congr AntitoneOn.congr
theorem _root_.StrictMonoOn.congr (h₁ : StrictMonoOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) :
StrictMonoOn f₂ s := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [← h ha, ← h hb]
exact h₁ ha hb hab
#align strict_mono_on.congr StrictMonoOn.congr
theorem _root_.StrictAntiOn.congr (h₁ : StrictAntiOn f₁ s) (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : StrictAntiOn f₂ s :=
h₁.dual_right.congr h
#align strict_anti_on.congr StrictAntiOn.congr
theorem EqOn.congr_monotoneOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : MonotoneOn f₁ s ↔ MonotoneOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_monotone_on Set.EqOn.congr_monotoneOn
theorem EqOn.congr_antitoneOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : AntitoneOn f₁ s ↔ AntitoneOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_antitone_on Set.EqOn.congr_antitoneOn
theorem EqOn.congr_strictMonoOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : StrictMonoOn f₁ s ↔ StrictMonoOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_strict_mono_on Set.EqOn.congr_strictMonoOn
theorem EqOn.congr_strictAntiOn (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : StrictAntiOn f₁ s ↔ StrictAntiOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h₁ => h₁.congr h, fun h₂ => h₂.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.congr_strict_anti_on Set.EqOn.congr_strictAntiOn
end Order
/-! ### Monotonicity lemmas-/
section Mono
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.mono (h : MonotoneOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : MonotoneOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align monotone_on.mono MonotoneOn.mono
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.mono (h : AntitoneOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : AntitoneOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align antitone_on.mono AntitoneOn.mono
theorem _root_.StrictMonoOn.mono (h : StrictMonoOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : StrictMonoOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align strict_mono_on.mono StrictMonoOn.mono
theorem _root_.StrictAntiOn.mono (h : StrictAntiOn f s) (h' : s₂ ⊆ s) : StrictAntiOn f s₂ :=
fun _ hx _ hy => h (h' hx) (h' hy)
#align strict_anti_on.mono StrictAntiOn.mono
protected theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.monotone (h : MonotoneOn f s) :
Monotone (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hle => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hle
#align monotone_on.monotone MonotoneOn.monotone
protected theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.monotone (h : AntitoneOn f s) :
Antitone (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hle => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hle
#align antitone_on.monotone AntitoneOn.monotone
protected theorem _root_.StrictMonoOn.strictMono (h : StrictMonoOn f s) :
StrictMono (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hlt => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hlt
#align strict_mono_on.strict_mono StrictMonoOn.strictMono
protected theorem _root_.StrictAntiOn.strictAnti (h : StrictAntiOn f s) :
StrictAnti (f ∘ Subtype.val : s → β) :=
fun x y hlt => h x.coe_prop y.coe_prop hlt
#align strict_anti_on.strict_anti StrictAntiOn.strictAnti
end Mono
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
section MapsTo
theorem MapsTo.restrict_commutes (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
Subtype.val ∘ h.restrict f s t = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem MapsTo.val_restrict_apply (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : s) : (h.restrict f s t x : β) = f x :=
rfl
#align set.maps_to.coe_restrict_apply Set.MapsTo.val_restrict_apply
theorem MapsTo.coe_iterate_restrict {f : α → α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (x : s) (k : ℕ) :
h.restrict^[k] x = f^[k] x := by
induction' k with k ih; · simp
simp only [iterate_succ', comp_apply, val_restrict_apply, ih]
/-- Restricting the domain and then the codomain is the same as `MapsTo.restrict`. -/
@[simp]
theorem codRestrict_restrict (h : ∀ x : s, f x ∈ t) :
codRestrict (s.restrict f) t h = MapsTo.restrict f s t fun x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align set.cod_restrict_restrict Set.codRestrict_restrict
/-- Reverse of `Set.codRestrict_restrict`. -/
theorem MapsTo.restrict_eq_codRestrict (h : MapsTo f s t) :
h.restrict f s t = codRestrict (s.restrict f) t fun x => h x.2 :=
rfl
#align set.maps_to.restrict_eq_cod_restrict Set.MapsTo.restrict_eq_codRestrict
theorem MapsTo.coe_restrict (h : Set.MapsTo f s t) :
Subtype.val ∘ h.restrict f s t = s.restrict f :=
rfl
#align set.maps_to.coe_restrict Set.MapsTo.coe_restrict
theorem MapsTo.range_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
range (h.restrict f s t) = Subtype.val ⁻¹' (f '' s) :=
Set.range_subtype_map f h
#align set.maps_to.range_restrict Set.MapsTo.range_restrict
theorem mapsTo_iff_exists_map_subtype : MapsTo f s t ↔ ∃ g : s → t, ∀ x : s, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.restrict f s t, fun _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨g, hg⟩ x hx => by
erw [hg ⟨x, hx⟩]
apply Subtype.coe_prop⟩
#align set.maps_to_iff_exists_map_subtype Set.mapsTo_iff_exists_map_subtype
theorem mapsTo' : MapsTo f s t ↔ f '' s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.symm
#align set.maps_to' Set.mapsTo'
theorem mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal : MapsTo (Prod.map f f) (diagonal α) (diagonal β) :=
diagonal_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
#align set.maps_to_prod_map_diagonal Set.mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal
theorem MapsTo.subset_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hf : MapsTo f s t) :
s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
hf
#align set.maps_to.subset_preimage Set.MapsTo.subset_preimage
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_singleton {x : α} : MapsTo f {x} t ↔ f x ∈ t :=
singleton_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_singleton Set.mapsTo_singleton
theorem mapsTo_empty (f : α → β) (t : Set β) : MapsTo f ∅ t :=
empty_subset _
#align set.maps_to_empty Set.mapsTo_empty
@[simp] theorem mapsTo_empty_iff : MapsTo f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [mapsTo', subset_empty_iff]
/-- If `f` maps `s` to `t` and `s` is non-empty, `t` is non-empty. -/
theorem MapsTo.nonempty (h : MapsTo f s t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(hs.image f).mono (mapsTo'.mp h)
theorem MapsTo.image_subset (h : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s ⊆ t :=
mapsTo'.1 h
#align set.maps_to.image_subset Set.MapsTo.image_subset
theorem MapsTo.congr (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₂ s t := fun _ hx =>
h hx ▸ h₁ hx
#align set.maps_to.congr Set.MapsTo.congr
theorem EqOn.comp_right (hg : t.EqOn g₁ g₂) (hf : s.MapsTo f t) : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) :=
fun _ ha => hg <| hf ha
#align set.eq_on.comp_right Set.EqOn.comp_right
theorem EqOn.mapsTo_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₁ s t ↔ MapsTo f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.maps_to_iff Set.EqOn.mapsTo_iff
theorem MapsTo.comp (h₁ : MapsTo g t p) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s p := fun _ h =>
h₁ (h₂ h)
#align set.maps_to.comp Set.MapsTo.comp
theorem mapsTo_id (s : Set α) : MapsTo id s s := fun _ => id
#align set.maps_to_id Set.mapsTo_id
theorem MapsTo.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) : ∀ n, MapsTo f^[n] s s
| 0 => fun _ => id
| n + 1 => (MapsTo.iterate h n).comp h
#align set.maps_to.iterate Set.MapsTo.iterate
theorem MapsTo.iterate_restrict {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
(h.restrict f s s)^[n] = (h.iterate n).restrict _ _ _ := by
funext x
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, MapsTo.val_restrict_apply]
induction' n with n ihn generalizing x
· rfl
· simp [Nat.iterate, ihn]
#align set.maps_to.iterate_restrict Set.MapsTo.iterate_restrict
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty) :
MapsTo f s t :=
fun a ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| h ⟨a, ha⟩
#align set.maps_to_of_subsingleton' Set.mapsTo_of_subsingleton'
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s s :=
mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ id
#align set.maps_to_of_subsingleton Set.mapsTo_of_subsingleton
theorem MapsTo.mono (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s₂ t₂ :=
fun _ hx => ht (hf <| hs hx)
#align set.maps_to.mono Set.MapsTo.mono
theorem MapsTo.mono_left (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : MapsTo f s₂ t := fun _ hx =>
hf (hs hx)
#align set.maps_to.mono_left Set.MapsTo.mono_left
theorem MapsTo.mono_right (hf : MapsTo f s t₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s t₂ := fun _ hx =>
ht (hf hx)
#align set.maps_to.mono_right Set.MapsTo.mono_right
theorem MapsTo.union_union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => Or.inl <| h₁ hx) fun hx => Or.inr <| h₂ hx
#align set.maps_to.union_union Set.MapsTo.union_union
theorem MapsTo.union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t) : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t :=
union_self t ▸ h₁.union_union h₂
#align set.maps_to.union Set.MapsTo.union
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_union : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t ↔ MapsTo f s₁ t ∧ MapsTo f s₂ t :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl t),
h.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl t)⟩,
fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
#align set.maps_to_union Set.mapsTo_union
theorem MapsTo.inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t₂) : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩
#align set.maps_to.inter Set.MapsTo.inter
theorem MapsTo.inter_inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
#align set.maps_to.inter_inter Set.MapsTo.inter_inter
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_inter : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) ↔ MapsTo f s t₁ ∧ MapsTo f s t₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_left,
h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.inter h.2⟩
#align set.maps_to_inter Set.mapsTo_inter
theorem mapsTo_univ (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s univ := fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.maps_to_univ Set.mapsTo_univ
theorem mapsTo_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s (range f) :=
(mapsTo_image f s).mono (Subset.refl s) (image_subset_range _ _)
#align set.maps_to_range Set.mapsTo_range
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_image_iff {f : α → β} {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} {t : Set β} :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
⟨fun h c hc => h ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc.2 ▸ h hc.1⟩
#align set.maps_image_to Set.mapsTo_image_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2023-12-25")]
lemma maps_image_to (f : α → β) (g : γ → α) (s : Set γ) (t : Set β) :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
mapsTo_image_iff
lemma MapsTo.comp_left (g : β → γ) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hf hx, rfl⟩
#align set.maps_to.comp_left Set.MapsTo.comp_left
lemma MapsTo.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hg : MapsTo g s t) (f : α → β) :
MapsTo (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := fun _ hx ↦ hg hx
#align set.maps_to.comp_right Set.MapsTo.comp_right
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_univ_iff : MapsTo f univ t ↔ ∀ x, f x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h _ => h (mem_univ _), fun h x _ => h x⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2023-12-25")]
theorem maps_univ_to (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : MapsTo f univ s ↔ ∀ a, f a ∈ s :=
mapsTo_univ_iff
#align set.maps_univ_to Set.maps_univ_to
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_range_iff {g : ι → α} : MapsTo f (range g) t ↔ ∀ i, f (g i) ∈ t :=
forall_mem_range
@[deprecated mapsTo_range_iff (since := "2023-12-25")]
theorem maps_range_to (f : α → β) (g : γ → α) (s : Set β) :
MapsTo f (range g) s ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) univ s := by rw [← image_univ, mapsTo_image_iff]
#align set.maps_range_to Set.maps_range_to
theorem surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
Surjective ((mapsTo_image f s).restrict f s (f '' s)) := fun ⟨_, x, hs, hxy⟩ =>
⟨⟨x, hs⟩, Subtype.ext hxy⟩
#align set.surjective_maps_to_image_restrict Set.surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict
theorem MapsTo.mem_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ) {x} : f x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ht => by_contra fun hs => hc hs ht, fun hx => h hx⟩
#align set.maps_to.mem_iff Set.MapsTo.mem_iff
end MapsTo
/-! ### Restriction onto preimage -/
section
variable (t)
variable (f s) in
theorem image_restrictPreimage :
t.restrictPreimage f '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s) = Subtype.val ⁻¹' (f '' s) := by
delta Set.restrictPreimage
rw [← (Subtype.coe_injective).image_injective.eq_iff, ← image_comp, MapsTo.restrict_commutes,
image_comp, Subtype.image_preimage_coe, Subtype.image_preimage_coe, image_preimage_inter]
variable (f) in
theorem range_restrictPreimage : range (t.restrictPreimage f) = Subtype.val ⁻¹' range f := by
simp only [← image_univ, ← image_restrictPreimage, preimage_univ]
#align set.range_restrict_preimage Set.range_restrictPreimage
variable {U : ι → Set β}
lemma restrictPreimage_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (t.restrictPreimage f) :=
fun _ _ e => Subtype.coe_injective <| hf <| Subtype.mk.inj e
#align set.restrict_preimage_injective Set.restrictPreimage_injective
lemma restrictPreimage_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (t.restrictPreimage f) :=
fun x => ⟨⟨_, ((hf x).choose_spec.symm ▸ x.2 : _ ∈ t)⟩, Subtype.ext (hf x).choose_spec⟩
#align set.restrict_preimage_surjective Set.restrictPreimage_surjective
lemma restrictPreimage_bijective (hf : Bijective f) : Bijective (t.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨t.restrictPreimage_injective hf.1, t.restrictPreimage_surjective hf.2⟩
#align set.restrict_preimage_bijective Set.restrictPreimage_bijective
alias _root_.Function.Injective.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_injective
alias _root_.Function.Surjective.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_surjective
alias _root_.Function.Bijective.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_bijective
#align function.bijective.restrict_preimage Function.Bijective.restrictPreimage
#align function.surjective.restrict_preimage Function.Surjective.restrictPreimage
#align function.injective.restrict_preimage Function.Injective.restrictPreimage
end
/-! ### Injectivity on a set -/
section injOn
theorem Subsingleton.injOn (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy _ =>
hs hx hy
#align set.subsingleton.inj_on Set.Subsingleton.injOn
@[simp]
theorem injOn_empty (f : α → β) : InjOn f ∅ :=
subsingleton_empty.injOn f
#align set.inj_on_empty Set.injOn_empty
@[simp]
theorem injOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : InjOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.injOn f
#align set.inj_on_singleton Set.injOn_singleton
@[simp] lemma injOn_pair {b : α} : InjOn f {a, b} ↔ f a = f b → a = b := by unfold InjOn; aesop
theorem InjOn.eq_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
⟨h hx hy, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
#align set.inj_on.eq_iff Set.InjOn.eq_iff
theorem InjOn.ne_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
(h.eq_iff hx hy).not
#align set.inj_on.ne_iff Set.InjOn.ne_iff
alias ⟨_, InjOn.ne⟩ := InjOn.ne_iff
#align set.inj_on.ne Set.InjOn.ne
theorem InjOn.congr (h₁ : InjOn f₁ s) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₂ s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
h hx ▸ h hy ▸ h₁ hx hy
#align set.inj_on.congr Set.InjOn.congr
theorem EqOn.injOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₁ s ↔ InjOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.inj_on_iff Set.EqOn.injOn_iff
theorem InjOn.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : InjOn f s₂) : InjOn f s₁ := fun _ hx _ hy H =>
ht (h hx) (h hy) H
#align set.inj_on.mono Set.InjOn.mono
theorem injOn_union (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ InjOn f s₁ ∧ InjOn f s₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁, ∀ y ∈ s₂, f x ≠ f y := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.mono subset_union_left, H.mono subset_union_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x hx y hy hxy
obtain rfl : x = y := H (Or.inl hx) (Or.inr hy) hxy
exact h.le_bot ⟨hx, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂, h₁₂⟩
rintro x (hx | hx) y (hy | hy) hxy
exacts [h₁ hx hy hxy, (h₁₂ _ hx _ hy hxy).elim, (h₁₂ _ hy _ hx hxy.symm).elim, h₂ hx hy hxy]
#align set.inj_on_union Set.injOn_union
theorem injOn_insert {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) :
Set.InjOn f (insert a s) ↔ Set.InjOn f s ∧ f a ∉ f '' s := by
rw [← union_singleton, injOn_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has)]
simp
#align set.inj_on_insert Set.injOn_insert
theorem injective_iff_injOn_univ : Injective f ↔ InjOn f univ :=
⟨fun h _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy, fun h _ _ heq => h trivial trivial heq⟩
#align set.injective_iff_inj_on_univ Set.injective_iff_injOn_univ
theorem injOn_of_injective (h : Injective f) {s : Set α} : InjOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy
#align set.inj_on_of_injective Set.injOn_of_injective
alias _root_.Function.Injective.injOn := injOn_of_injective
#align function.injective.inj_on Function.Injective.injOn
-- A specialization of `injOn_of_injective` for `Subtype.val`.
theorem injOn_subtype_val {s : Set { x // p x }} : Set.InjOn Subtype.val s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
lemma injOn_id (s : Set α) : InjOn id s := injective_id.injOn
#align set.inj_on_id Set.injOn_id
theorem InjOn.comp (hg : InjOn g t) (hf : InjOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq => hf hx hy <| hg (h hx) (h hy) heq
#align set.inj_on.comp Set.InjOn.comp
lemma InjOn.image_of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn g (f '' s) :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy heq ↦ congr_arg f <| h hx hy heq
lemma InjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hf : MapsTo f s s) :
∀ n, InjOn f^[n] s
| 0 => injOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate hf n).comp h hf
#align set.inj_on.iterate Set.InjOn.iterate
lemma injOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : InjOn f s :=
(injective_of_subsingleton _).injOn
#align set.inj_on_of_subsingleton Set.injOn_of_subsingleton
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.injOn_range (h : Injective (g ∘ f)) : InjOn g (range f) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ H
exact congr_arg f (h H)
#align function.injective.inj_on_range Function.Injective.injOn_range
theorem injOn_iff_injective : InjOn f s ↔ Injective (s.restrict f) :=
⟨fun H a b h => Subtype.eq <| H a.2 b.2 h, fun H a as b bs h =>
congr_arg Subtype.val <| @H ⟨a, as⟩ ⟨b, bs⟩ h⟩
#align set.inj_on_iff_injective Set.injOn_iff_injective
alias ⟨InjOn.injective, _⟩ := Set.injOn_iff_injective
#align set.inj_on.injective Set.InjOn.injective
theorem MapsTo.restrict_inj (h : MapsTo f s t) : Injective (h.restrict f s t) ↔ InjOn f s := by
rw [h.restrict_eq_codRestrict, injective_codRestrict, injOn_iff_injective]
#align set.maps_to.restrict_inj Set.MapsTo.restrict_inj
theorem exists_injOn_iff_injective [Nonempty β] :
(∃ f : α → β, InjOn f s) ↔ ∃ f : s → β, Injective f :=
⟨fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => ⟨_, hf.injective⟩,
fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => by
lift f to α → β using trivial
exact ⟨f, injOn_iff_injective.2 hf⟩⟩
#align set.exists_inj_on_iff_injective Set.exists_injOn_iff_injective
theorem injOn_preimage {B : Set (Set β)} (hB : B ⊆ 𝒫 range f) : InjOn (preimage f) B :=
fun s hs t ht hst => (preimage_eq_preimage' (@hB s hs) (@hB t ht)).1 hst
-- Porting note: is there a semi-implicit variable problem with `⊆`?
#align set.inj_on_preimage Set.injOn_preimage
theorem InjOn.mem_of_mem_image {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (h : x ∈ s) (h₁ : f x ∈ f '' s₁) :
x ∈ s₁ :=
let ⟨_, h', Eq⟩ := h₁
hf (hs h') h Eq ▸ h'
#align set.inj_on.mem_of_mem_image Set.InjOn.mem_of_mem_image
theorem InjOn.mem_image_iff {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
f x ∈ f '' s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₁ :=
⟨hf.mem_of_mem_image hs hx, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
#align set.inj_on.mem_image_iff Set.InjOn.mem_image_iff
theorem InjOn.preimage_image_inter (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s₁) ∩ s = s₁ :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => hf.mem_of_mem_image hs h₂ h₁, fun h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h, hs h⟩⟩
#align set.inj_on.preimage_image_inter Set.InjOn.preimage_image_inter
theorem EqOn.cancel_left (h : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂)) (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t)
(hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) : s.EqOn f₁ f₂ := fun _ ha => hg (hf₁ ha) (hf₂ ha) (h ha)
#align set.eq_on.cancel_left Set.EqOn.cancel_left
theorem InjOn.cancel_left (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t) (hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) :
s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) ↔ s.EqOn f₁ f₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_left hg hf₁ hf₂, EqOn.comp_left⟩
#align set.inj_on.cancel_left Set.InjOn.cancel_left
lemma InjOn.image_inter {s t u : Set α} (hf : u.InjOn f) (hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t := by
apply Subset.antisymm (image_inter_subset _ _ _)
intro x ⟨⟨y, ys, hy⟩, ⟨z, zt, hz⟩⟩
have : y = z := by
apply hf (hs ys) (ht zt)
rwa [← hz] at hy
rw [← this] at zt
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, zt⟩, hy⟩
#align set.inj_on.image_inter Set.InjOn.image_inter
lemma InjOn.image (h : s.InjOn f) : s.powerset.InjOn (image f) :=
fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ h' ↦ by rw [← h.preimage_image_inter hs₁, h', h.preimage_image_inter hs₂]
theorem InjOn.image_eq_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ = f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
h.image.eq_iff h₁ h₂
lemma InjOn.image_subset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊆ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := by
refine' ⟨fun h' ↦ _, image_subset _⟩
rw [← h.preimage_image_inter h₁, ← h.preimage_image_inter h₂]
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono h')
lemma InjOn.image_ssubset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊂ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ := by
simp_rw [ssubset_def, h.image_subset_image_iff h₁ h₂, h.image_subset_image_iff h₂ h₁]
-- TODO: can this move to a better place?
theorem _root_.Disjoint.image {s t u : Set α} {f : α → β} (h : Disjoint s t) (hf : u.InjOn f)
(hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at h ⊢
rw [← hf.image_inter hs ht, h, image_empty]
#align disjoint.image Disjoint.image
lemma InjOn.image_diff {t : Set α} (h : s.InjOn f) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' (s ∩ t) := by
refine subset_antisymm (subset_diff.2 ⟨image_subset f diff_subset, ?_⟩)
(diff_subset_iff.2 (by rw [← image_union, inter_union_diff]))
exact Disjoint.image disjoint_sdiff_inter h diff_subset inter_subset_left
lemma InjOn.image_diff_subset {f : α → β} {t : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t := by
rw [h.image_diff, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
theorem InjOn.imageFactorization_injective (h : InjOn f s) :
Injective (s.imageFactorization f) :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h' ↦ by simpa [imageFactorization, h.eq_iff hx hy] using h'
@[simp] theorem imageFactorization_injective_iff : Injective (s.imageFactorization f) ↔ InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ ↦ by simpa using @h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ (by simpa [imageFactorization]),
InjOn.imageFactorization_injective⟩
end injOn
section graphOn
@[simp] lemma graphOn_empty (f : α → β) : graphOn f ∅ = ∅ := image_empty _
@[simp]
lemma graphOn_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : graphOn f (s ∪ t) = graphOn f s ∪ graphOn f t :=
image_union ..
@[simp]
lemma graphOn_singleton (f : α → β) (x : α) : graphOn f {x} = {(x, f x)} :=
image_singleton ..
@[simp]
lemma graphOn_insert (f : α → β) (x : α) (s : Set α) :
graphOn f (insert x s) = insert (x, f x) (graphOn f s) :=
image_insert_eq ..
@[simp]
lemma image_fst_graphOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : Prod.fst '' graphOn f s = s := by
simp [graphOn, image_image]
lemma exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f : α → β, s = graphOn f (Prod.fst '' s)) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
rw [hf]
exact InjOn.image_of_comp <| injOn_id _
· have : ∀ x ∈ Prod.fst '' s, ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s := forall_mem_image.2 fun (x, y) h ↦ ⟨y, h⟩
choose! f hf using this
rw [forall_mem_image] at hf
use f
rw [graphOn, image_image, EqOn.image_eq_self]
exact fun x hx ↦ h (hf hx) hx rfl
lemma exists_eq_graphOn [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f t, s = graphOn f t) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s :=
.trans ⟨fun ⟨f, t, hs⟩ ↦ ⟨f, by rw [hs, image_fst_graphOn]⟩, fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ↦ ⟨f, _, hf⟩⟩
exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst
end graphOn
/-! ### Surjectivity on a set -/
section surjOn
theorem SurjOn.subset_range (h : SurjOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
Subset.trans h <| image_subset_range f s
#align set.surj_on.subset_range Set.SurjOn.subset_range
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_map_subtype :
SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ (t' : Set β) (g : s → t'), t ⊆ t' ∧ Surjective g ∧ ∀ x : s, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨_, (mapsTo_image f s).restrict f s _, h, surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _, fun _ => rfl⟩,
fun ⟨t', g, htt', hg, hfg⟩ y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hg ⟨y, htt' hy⟩
⟨x, x.2, by rw [hfg, hx, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩⟩
#align set.surj_on_iff_exists_map_subtype Set.surjOn_iff_exists_map_subtype
theorem surjOn_empty (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s ∅ :=
empty_subset _
#align set.surj_on_empty Set.surjOn_empty
@[simp] theorem surjOn_empty_iff : SurjOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ := by
simp [SurjOn, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma surjOn_singleton : SurjOn f s {b} ↔ b ∈ f '' s := singleton_subset_iff
#align set.surj_on_singleton Set.surjOn_singleton
theorem surjOn_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s (f '' s) :=
Subset.rfl
#align set.surj_on_image Set.surjOn_image
theorem SurjOn.comap_nonempty (h : SurjOn f s t) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(ht.mono h).of_image
#align set.surj_on.comap_nonempty Set.SurjOn.comap_nonempty
theorem SurjOn.congr (h : SurjOn f₁ s t) (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₂ s t := by
rwa [SurjOn, ← H.image_eq]
#align set.surj_on.congr Set.SurjOn.congr
theorem EqOn.surjOn_iff (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₁ s t ↔ SurjOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun H => H.congr h, fun H => H.congr h.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.surj_on_iff Set.EqOn.surjOn_iff
theorem SurjOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (hf : SurjOn f s₁ t₂) : SurjOn f s₂ t₁ :=
Subset.trans ht <| Subset.trans hf <| image_subset _ hs
#align set.surj_on.mono Set.SurjOn.mono
theorem SurjOn.union (h₁ : SurjOn f s t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s t₂) : SurjOn f s (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => h₁ hx) fun hx => h₂ hx
#align set.surj_on.union Set.SurjOn.union
theorem SurjOn.union_union (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
(h₁.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl _)).union
(h₂.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl _))
#align set.surj_on.union_union Set.SurjOn.union_union
theorem SurjOn.inter_inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
intro y hy
rcases h₁ hy.1 with ⟨x₁, hx₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ hy.2 with ⟨x₂, hx₂, heq⟩
obtain rfl : x₁ = x₂ := h (Or.inl hx₁) (Or.inr hx₂) heq.symm
exact mem_image_of_mem f ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align set.surj_on.inter_inter Set.SurjOn.inter_inter
theorem SurjOn.inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) t :=
inter_self t ▸ h₁.inter_inter h₂ h
#align set.surj_on.inter Set.SurjOn.inter
-- Porting note: Why does `simp` not call `refl` by itself?
lemma surjOn_id (s : Set α) : SurjOn id s s := by simp [SurjOn, subset_rfl]
#align set.surj_on_id Set.surjOn_id
theorem SurjOn.comp (hg : SurjOn g t p) (hf : SurjOn f s t) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
Subset.trans hg <| Subset.trans (image_subset g hf) <| image_comp g f s ▸ Subset.refl _
#align set.surj_on.comp Set.SurjOn.comp
lemma SurjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : SurjOn f s s) : ∀ n, SurjOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => surjOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
#align set.surj_on.iterate Set.SurjOn.iterate
lemma SurjOn.comp_left (hf : SurjOn f s t) (g : β → γ) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) := by
rw [SurjOn, image_comp g f]; exact image_subset _ hf
#align set.surj_on.comp_left Set.SurjOn.comp_left
lemma SurjOn.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := by
rwa [SurjOn, image_comp g f, image_preimage_eq _ hf]
#align set.surj_on.comp_right Set.SurjOn.comp_right
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : t.Nonempty → s.Nonempty) :
SurjOn f s t :=
fun _ ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| (h ⟨_, ha⟩).image _
#align set.surj_on_of_subsingleton' Set.surjOn_of_subsingleton'
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s s :=
surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ id
#align set.surj_on_of_subsingleton Set.surjOn_of_subsingleton
theorem surjective_iff_surjOn_univ : Surjective f ↔ SurjOn f univ univ := by
simp [Surjective, SurjOn, subset_def]
#align set.surjective_iff_surj_on_univ Set.surjective_iff_surjOn_univ
theorem surjOn_iff_surjective : SurjOn f s univ ↔ Surjective (s.restrict f) :=
⟨fun H b =>
let ⟨a, as, e⟩ := @H b trivial
⟨⟨a, as⟩, e⟩,
fun H b _ =>
let ⟨⟨a, as⟩, e⟩ := H b
⟨a, as, e⟩⟩
#align set.surj_on_iff_surjective Set.surjOn_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem MapsTo.restrict_surjective_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) :
Surjective (MapsTo.restrict _ _ _ h) ↔ SurjOn f s t := by
refine ⟨fun h' b hb ↦ ?_, fun h' ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ha'⟩ := h' ⟨b, hb⟩
replace ha' : f a = b := by simpa [Subtype.ext_iff] using ha'
rw [← ha']
exact mem_image_of_mem f ha
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h' hb
exact ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
theorem SurjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo (h₁ : SurjOn f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s = t :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset h₂.image_subset h₁
#align set.surj_on.image_eq_of_maps_to Set.SurjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo
theorem image_eq_iff_surjOn_mapsTo : f '' s = t ↔ s.SurjOn f t ∧ s.MapsTo f t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.1.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.2⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.surjOn_image f, s.mapsTo_image f⟩
#align set.image_eq_iff_surj_on_maps_to Set.image_eq_iff_surjOn_mapsTo
lemma SurjOn.image_preimage (h : Set.SurjOn f s t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : f '' (f ⁻¹' t₁) = t₁ :=
image_preimage_eq_iff.2 fun _ hx ↦ mem_range_of_mem_image f s <| h <| ht hx
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_compl (h : SurjOn f s t) (h' : Injective f) : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ :=
fun _ hs ht =>
let ⟨_, hx', HEq⟩ := h ht
hs <| h' HEq ▸ hx'
#align set.surj_on.maps_to_compl Set.SurjOn.mapsTo_compl
theorem MapsTo.surjOn_compl (h : MapsTo f s t) (h' : Surjective f) : SurjOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
h'.forall.2 fun _ ht => (mem_image_of_mem _) fun hs => ht (h hs)
#align set.maps_to.surj_on_compl Set.MapsTo.surjOn_compl
theorem EqOn.cancel_right (hf : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f)) (hf' : s.SurjOn f t) : t.EqOn g₁ g₂ := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf' hb
exact hf ha
#align set.eq_on.cancel_right Set.EqOn.cancel_right
theorem SurjOn.cancel_right (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ t.EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_right hf, fun h => h.comp_right hf'⟩
#align set.surj_on.cancel_right Set.SurjOn.cancel_right
theorem eqOn_comp_right_iff : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ (f '' s).EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
(s.surjOn_image f).cancel_right <| s.mapsTo_image f
#align set.eq_on_comp_right_iff Set.eqOn_comp_right_iff
theorem SurjOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
(∀ y ∈ t, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
⟨fun H x hx ↦ H (f x) (hf' hx), fun H _y hy ↦ let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := hf hy; hxy ▸ H x hx⟩
end surjOn
/-! ### Bijectivity -/
section bijOn
theorem BijOn.mapsTo (h : BijOn f s t) : MapsTo f s t :=
h.left
#align set.bij_on.maps_to Set.BijOn.mapsTo
theorem BijOn.injOn (h : BijOn f s t) : InjOn f s :=
h.right.left
#align set.bij_on.inj_on Set.BijOn.injOn
theorem BijOn.surjOn (h : BijOn f s t) : SurjOn f s t :=
h.right.right
#align set.bij_on.surj_on Set.BijOn.surjOn
theorem BijOn.mk (h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : InjOn f s) (h₃ : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
#align set.bij_on.mk Set.BijOn.mk
theorem bijOn_empty (f : α → β) : BijOn f ∅ ∅ :=
⟨mapsTo_empty f ∅, injOn_empty f, surjOn_empty f ∅⟩
#align set.bij_on_empty Set.bijOn_empty
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_left : BijOn f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.mapsTo, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_right : BijOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.surjOn, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] lemma bijOn_singleton : BijOn f {a} {b} ↔ f a = b := by simp [BijOn, eq_comm]
#align set.bij_on_singleton Set.bijOn_singleton
theorem BijOn.inter_mapsTo (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s₂) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun _ hy =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h₁.surjOn hy.1
⟨x, ⟨hx, h₃ ⟨hx, hxy.symm.subst hy.2⟩⟩, hxy⟩⟩
#align set.bij_on.inter_maps_to Set.BijOn.inter_mapsTo
theorem MapsTo.inter_bijOn (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₂ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s₁) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
inter_comm s₂ s₁ ▸ inter_comm t₂ t₁ ▸ h₂.inter_mapsTo h₁ h₃
#align set.maps_to.inter_bij_on Set.MapsTo.inter_bijOn
theorem BijOn.inter (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left,
h₁.surjOn.inter_inter h₂.surjOn h⟩
#align set.bij_on.inter Set.BijOn.inter
theorem BijOn.union (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.union_union h₂.mapsTo, h, h₁.surjOn.union_union h₂.surjOn⟩
#align set.bij_on.union Set.BijOn.union
theorem BijOn.subset_range (h : BijOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
h.surjOn.subset_range
#align set.bij_on.subset_range Set.BijOn.subset_range
theorem InjOn.bijOn_image (h : InjOn f s) : BijOn f s (f '' s) :=
BijOn.mk (mapsTo_image f s) h (Subset.refl _)
#align set.inj_on.bij_on_image Set.InjOn.bijOn_image
theorem BijOn.congr (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₂ s t :=
BijOn.mk (h₁.mapsTo.congr h) (h₁.injOn.congr h) (h₁.surjOn.congr h)
#align set.bij_on.congr Set.BijOn.congr
theorem EqOn.bijOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₁ s t ↔ BijOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
#align set.eq_on.bij_on_iff Set.EqOn.bijOn_iff
theorem BijOn.image_eq (h : BijOn f s t) : f '' s = t :=
h.surjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.mapsTo
#align set.bij_on.image_eq Set.BijOn.image_eq
lemma BijOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∀ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp h a ha := h _ $ hf.mapsTo ha
mpr h b hb := by obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact h _ ha
lemma BijOn.exists {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∃ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp := by rintro ⟨b, hb, h⟩; obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact ⟨a, ha, h⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨a, ha, h⟩; exact ⟨f a, hf.mapsTo ha, h⟩
lemma _root_.Equiv.image_eq_iff_bijOn (e : α ≃ β) : e '' s = t ↔ BijOn e s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨(mapsTo_image e s).mono_right h.subset, e.injective.injOn, h ▸ surjOn_image e s⟩,
BijOn.image_eq⟩
lemma bijOn_id (s : Set α) : BijOn id s s := ⟨s.mapsTo_id, s.injOn_id, s.surjOn_id⟩
#align set.bij_on_id Set.bijOn_id
theorem BijOn.comp (hg : BijOn g t p) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
BijOn.mk (hg.mapsTo.comp hf.mapsTo) (hg.injOn.comp hf.injOn hf.mapsTo) (hg.surjOn.comp hf.surjOn)
#align set.bij_on.comp Set.BijOn.comp
lemma BijOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n, BijOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => s.bijOn_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
#align set.bij_on.iterate Set.BijOn.iterate
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β)
(h : s.Nonempty ↔ t.Nonempty) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ h.1, injOn_of_subsingleton _ _, surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ h.2⟩
#align set.bij_on_of_subsingleton' Set.bijOn_of_subsingleton'
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : BijOn f s s :=
bijOn_of_subsingleton' _ Iff.rfl
#align set.bij_on_of_subsingleton Set.bijOn_of_subsingleton
theorem BijOn.bijective (h : BijOn f s t) : Bijective (h.mapsTo.restrict f s t) :=
⟨fun x y h' => Subtype.ext <| h.injOn x.2 y.2 <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h', fun ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h.surjOn hy
⟨⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.eq hxy⟩⟩
#align set.bij_on.bijective Set.BijOn.bijective
theorem bijective_iff_bijOn_univ : Bijective f ↔ BijOn f univ univ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨mapsTo_univ f _, inj.injOn, Iff.mp surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩)
fun h =>
let ⟨_map, inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨Iff.mpr injective_iff_injOn_univ inj, Iff.mpr surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩
#align set.bijective_iff_bij_on_univ Set.bijective_iff_bijOn_univ
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Bijective.bijOn_univ, _⟩ := bijective_iff_bijOn_univ
#align function.bijective.bij_on_univ Function.Bijective.bijOn_univ
theorem BijOn.compl (hst : BijOn f s t) (hf : Bijective f) : BijOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
⟨hst.surjOn.mapsTo_compl hf.1, hf.1.injOn, hst.mapsTo.surjOn_compl hf.2⟩
#align set.bij_on.compl Set.BijOn.compl
theorem BijOn.subset_right {r : Set β} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrt : r ⊆ t) :
BijOn f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' r) r := by
refine ⟨inter_subset_right, hf.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn (hrt hx)
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_left {r : Set α} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
BijOn f r (f '' r) :=
(hf.injOn.mono hrs).bijOn_image
end bijOn
/-! ### left inverse -/
namespace LeftInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : EqOn (f' ∘ f) id s :=
h
#align set.left_inv_on.eq_on Set.LeftInvOn.eqOn
theorem eq (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : f' (f x) = x :=
h hx
#align set.left_inv_on.eq Set.LeftInvOn.eq
theorem congr_left (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) {t : Set β} (h₁' : MapsTo f s t)
(heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) : LeftInvOn f₂' f s := fun _ hx => heq (h₁' hx) ▸ h₁ hx
#align set.left_inv_on.congr_left Set.LeftInvOn.congr_left
theorem congr_right (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f₁ s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : LeftInvOn f₁' f₂ s :=
fun _ hx => heq hx ▸ h₁ hx
#align set.left_inv_on.congr_right Set.LeftInvOn.congr_right
theorem injOn (h : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) : InjOn f s := fun x₁ h₁ x₂ h₂ heq =>
calc
x₁ = f₁' (f x₁) := Eq.symm <| h h₁
_ = f₁' (f x₂) := congr_arg f₁' heq
_ = x₂ := h h₂
#align set.left_inv_on.inj_on Set.LeftInvOn.injOn
theorem surjOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn f' t s := fun x hx =>
⟨f x, hf hx, h hx⟩
#align set.left_inv_on.surj_on Set.LeftInvOn.surjOn
theorem mapsTo (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
MapsTo f' t s := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hs, hx⟩ := hf hy
rwa [← hx, h hs]
#align set.left_inv_on.maps_to Set.LeftInvOn.mapsTo
lemma _root_.Set.leftInvOn_id (s : Set α) : LeftInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
#align set.left_inv_on_id Set.leftInvOn_id
theorem comp (hf' : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hg' : LeftInvOn g' g t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) :
LeftInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s := fun x h =>
calc
(f' ∘ g') ((g ∘ f) x) = f' (f x) := congr_arg f' (hg' (hf h))
_ = x := hf' h
#align set.left_inv_on.comp Set.LeftInvOn.comp
theorem mono (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s) : LeftInvOn f' f s₁ := fun _ hx =>
hf (ht hx)
#align set.left_inv_on.mono Set.LeftInvOn.mono
theorem image_inter' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' s₁ ∩ f '' s := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨by rwa [mem_preimage, hf h], mem_image_of_mem _ h⟩
· rintro _ ⟨h₁, ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨by rwa [← hf h], h⟩
#align set.left_inv_on.image_inter' Set.LeftInvOn.image_inter'
theorem image_inter (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) :
f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' (s₁ ∩ s) ∩ f '' s := by
rw [hf.image_inter']
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono inter_subset_left))
rintro _ ⟨h₁, x, hx, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨h₁, by rwa [hf hx]⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
#align set.left_inv_on.image_inter Set.LeftInvOn.image_inter
theorem image_image (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f' '' (f '' s) = s := by
rw [Set.image_image, image_congr hf, image_id']
#align set.left_inv_on.image_image Set.LeftInvOn.image_image
theorem image_image' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f' '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).image_image
#align set.left_inv_on.image_image' Set.LeftInvOn.image_image'
end LeftInvOn
/-! ### Right inverse -/
section RightInvOn
namespace RightInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : RightInvOn f' f t) : EqOn (f ∘ f') id t :=
h
#align set.right_inv_on.eq_on Set.RightInvOn.eqOn
theorem eq (h : RightInvOn f' f t) {y} (hy : y ∈ t) : f (f' y) = y :=
h hy
#align set.right_inv_on.eq Set.RightInvOn.eq
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.rightInvOn_image (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : RightInvOn f' f (f '' s) :=
fun _y ⟨_x, hx, heq⟩ => heq ▸ (congr_arg f <| h.eq hx)
#align set.left_inv_on.right_inv_on_image Set.LeftInvOn.rightInvOn_image
theorem congr_left (h₁ : RightInvOn f₁' f t) (heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) :
RightInvOn f₂' f t :=
h₁.congr_right heq
#align set.right_inv_on.congr_left Set.RightInvOn.congr_left
theorem congr_right (h₁ : RightInvOn f' f₁ t) (hg : MapsTo f' t s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) :
RightInvOn f' f₂ t :=
LeftInvOn.congr_left h₁ hg heq
#align set.right_inv_on.congr_right Set.RightInvOn.congr_right
theorem surjOn (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : SurjOn f s t :=
LeftInvOn.surjOn hf hf'
#align set.right_inv_on.surj_on Set.RightInvOn.surjOn
theorem mapsTo (h : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf : SurjOn f' t s) : MapsTo f s t :=
LeftInvOn.mapsTo h hf
#align set.right_inv_on.maps_to Set.RightInvOn.mapsTo
lemma _root_.Set.rightInvOn_id (s : Set α) : RightInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
#align set.right_inv_on_id Set.rightInvOn_id
theorem comp (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hg : RightInvOn g' g p) (g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
RightInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) p :=
LeftInvOn.comp hg hf g'pt
#align set.right_inv_on.comp Set.RightInvOn.comp
theorem mono (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : RightInvOn f' f t₁ :=
LeftInvOn.mono hf ht
#align set.right_inv_on.mono Set.RightInvOn.mono
end RightInvOn
theorem InjOn.rightInvOn_of_leftInvOn (hf : InjOn f s) (hf' : LeftInvOn f f' t)
(h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f' t s) : RightInvOn f f' s := fun _ h =>
hf (h₂ <| h₁ h) h (hf' (h₁ h))
#align set.inj_on.right_inv_on_of_left_inv_on Set.InjOn.rightInvOn_of_leftInvOn
theorem eqOn_of_leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) (h₂ : RightInvOn f₂' f t)
(h : MapsTo f₂' t s) : EqOn f₁' f₂' t := fun y hy =>
calc
f₁' y = (f₁' ∘ f ∘ f₂') y := congr_arg f₁' (h₂ hy).symm
_ = f₂' y := h₁ (h hy)
#align set.eq_on_of_left_inv_on_of_right_inv_on Set.eqOn_of_leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn
theorem SurjOn.leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (hf : SurjOn f s t) (hf' : RightInvOn f f' s) :
LeftInvOn f f' t := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hx, heq⟩ := hf hy
rw [← heq, hf' hx]
#align set.surj_on.left_inv_on_of_right_inv_on Set.SurjOn.leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn
end RightInvOn
/-! ### Two-side inverses -/
namespace InvOn
lemma _root_.Set.invOn_id (s : Set α) : InvOn id id s s := ⟨s.leftInvOn_id, s.rightInvOn_id⟩
#align set.inv_on_id Set.invOn_id
lemma comp (hf : InvOn f' f s t) (hg : InvOn g' g t p) (fst : MapsTo f s t)
(g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
InvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s p :=
⟨hf.1.comp hg.1 fst, hf.2.comp hg.2 g'pt⟩
#align set.inv_on.comp Set.InvOn.comp
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : InvOn f' f s t) : InvOn f f' t s :=
⟨h.right, h.left⟩
#align set.inv_on.symm Set.InvOn.symm
theorem mono (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : InvOn f' f s₁ t₁ :=
⟨h.1.mono hs, h.2.mono ht⟩
#align set.inv_on.mono Set.InvOn.mono
/-- If functions `f'` and `f` are inverse on `s` and `t`, `f` maps `s` into `t`, and `f'` maps `t`
into `s`, then `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`. The `mapsTo` arguments can be deduced from
`surjOn` statements using `LeftInvOn.mapsTo` and `RightInvOn.mapsTo`. -/
theorem bijOn (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨hf, h.left.injOn, h.right.surjOn hf'⟩
#align set.inv_on.bij_on Set.InvOn.bijOn
end InvOn
end Set
/-! ### `invFunOn` is a left/right inverse -/
namespace Function
variable [Nonempty α] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : β}
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. This function is a right inverse of `f`
on `f '' s`. For a computable version, see `Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange`. -/
noncomputable def invFunOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (b : β) : α :=
if h : ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then Classical.choose h else Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α›
#align function.inv_fun_on Function.invFunOn
theorem invFunOn_pos (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s ∧ f (invFunOn f s b) = b := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_pos h]
exact Classical.choose_spec h
#align function.inv_fun_on_pos Function.invFunOn_pos
theorem invFunOn_mem (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s :=
(invFunOn_pos h).left
#align function.inv_fun_on_mem Function.invFunOn_mem
theorem invFunOn_eq (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : f (invFunOn f s b) = b :=
(invFunOn_pos h).right
#align function.inv_fun_on_eq Function.invFunOn_eq
theorem invFunOn_neg (h : ¬∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b = Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α› := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_neg h]
#align function.inv_fun_on_neg Function.invFunOn_neg
@[simp]
theorem invFunOn_apply_mem (h : a ∈ s) : invFunOn f s (f a) ∈ s :=
invFunOn_mem ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
#align function.inv_fun_on_apply_mem Function.invFunOn_apply_mem
theorem invFunOn_apply_eq (h : a ∈ s) : f (invFunOn f s (f a)) = f a :=
invFunOn_eq ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
#align function.inv_fun_on_apply_eq Function.invFunOn_apply_eq
end Function
open Function
namespace Set
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun _a ha => h (invFunOn_apply_mem ha) ha (invFunOn_apply_eq ha)
#align set.inj_on.left_inv_on_inv_fun_on Set.InjOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn
theorem InjOn.invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s₂) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
invFunOn f s₂ '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
h.leftInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' ht
#align set.inj_on.inv_fun_on_image Set.InjOn.invFunOn_image
theorem _root_.Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image [Nonempty α]
(h : s ⊆ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s)) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨-, ⟨x, hx', rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h hx
rw [invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self [Nonempty α] :
InjOn f s ↔ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) = s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.invFunOn_image Subset.rfl, fun h ↦
(Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image h.symm.subset).injOn⟩
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_injOn_image [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
Set.InjOn (invFunOn f s) (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ he
rw [← invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx, he, invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_image_image_subset [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
(invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) ⊆ s := by
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨x,hx,rfl⟩, rfl⟩; exact invFunOn_apply_mem hx
theorem SurjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
RightInvOn (invFunOn f s) f t := fun _y hy => invFunOn_eq <| h hy
#align set.surj_on.right_inv_on_inv_fun_on Set.SurjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn
theorem BijOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : BijOn f s t) : InvOn (invFunOn f s) f s t :=
⟨h.injOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn, h.surjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
#align set.bij_on.inv_on_inv_fun_on Set.BijOn.invOn_invFunOn
theorem SurjOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
InvOn (invFunOn f s) f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine ⟨?_, h.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
#align set.surj_on.inv_on_inv_fun_on Set.SurjOn.invOn_invFunOn
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : MapsTo (invFunOn f s) t s :=
fun _y hy => mem_preimage.2 <| invFunOn_mem <| h hy
#align set.surj_on.maps_to_inv_fun_on Set.SurjOn.mapsTo_invFunOn
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image'`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image_of_subset [Nonempty α] {r : Set β} (hf : SurjOn f s t)
(hrt : r ⊆ t) : f '' (f.invFunOn s '' r) = r :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' hrt
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
f '' (f.invFunOn s '' t) = t :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image
theorem SurjOn.bijOn_subset [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine h.invOn_invFunOn.bijOn ?_ (mapsTo_image _ _)
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rwa [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
#align set.surj_on.bij_on_subset Set.SurjOn.bijOn_subset
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset : SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' t := by
constructor
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with (rfl | ht)
· exact fun _ => ⟨∅, empty_subset _, bijOn_empty f⟩
· intro h
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨Classical.choose (h.comap_nonempty ht)⟩
exact ⟨_, h.mapsTo_invFunOn.image_subset, h.bijOn_subset⟩
· rintro ⟨s', hs', hfs'⟩
exact hfs'.surjOn.mono hs' (Subset.refl _)
#align set.surj_on_iff_exists_bij_on_subset Set.surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset
alias ⟨SurjOn.exists_bijOn_subset, _⟩ := Set.surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset
variable (f s)
lemma exists_subset_bijOn : ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' (f '' s) :=
surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset.mp (surjOn_image f s)
lemma exists_image_eq_and_injOn : ∃ u, f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u :=
let ⟨u, _, hfu⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn s f
⟨u, hfu.image_eq, hfu.injOn⟩
variable {f s}
lemma exists_image_eq_injOn_of_subset_range (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
∃ s, f '' s = t ∧ InjOn f s :=
image_preimage_eq_of_subset ht ▸ exists_image_eq_and_injOn _ _
theorem preimage_invFun_of_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∈ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp only [mem_preimage, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, mem_range_self, not_true, or_false,
leftInverse_invFun hf _, hf.mem_set_image]
· simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, hx, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, not_false_iff, or_true]
#align set.preimage_inv_fun_of_mem Set.preimage_invFun_of_mem
theorem preimage_invFun_of_not_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∉ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· rw [mem_preimage, leftInverse_invFun hf, hf.mem_set_image]
· have : x ∉ f '' s := fun h' => hx (image_subset_range _ _ h')
simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, this]
#align set.preimage_inv_fun_of_not_mem Set.preimage_invFun_of_not_mem
lemma BijOn.symm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn g t s :=
⟨h.2.mapsTo hf.surjOn, h.1.injOn, h.2.surjOn hf.mapsTo⟩
#align set.bij_on.symm Set.BijOn.symm
lemma bijOn_comm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) : BijOn f s t ↔ BijOn g t s :=
⟨BijOn.symm h, BijOn.symm h.symm⟩
#align set.bij_on_comm Set.bijOn_comm
end Set
/-! ### Monotone -/
namespace Monotone
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
protected theorem restrict (h : Monotone f) (s : Set α) : Monotone (s.restrict f) := fun _ _ hxy =>
h hxy
#align monotone.restrict Monotone.restrict
protected theorem codRestrict (h : Monotone f) {s : Set β} (hs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) :
Monotone (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
h
#align monotone.cod_restrict Monotone.codRestrict
protected theorem rangeFactorization (h : Monotone f) : Monotone (Set.rangeFactorization f) :=
h
#align monotone.range_factorization Monotone.rangeFactorization
end Monotone
/-! ### Piecewise defined function -/
namespace Set
variable {δ : α → Sort*} (s : Set α) (f g : ∀ i, δ i)
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_empty [∀ i : α, Decidable (i ∈ (∅ : Set α))] : piecewise ∅ f g = g := by
ext i
simp [piecewise]
#align set.piecewise_empty Set.piecewise_empty
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_univ [∀ i : α, Decidable (i ∈ (Set.univ : Set α))] :
piecewise Set.univ f g = f := by
ext i
simp [piecewise]
#align set.piecewise_univ Set.piecewise_univ
--@[simp] -- Porting note: simpNF linter complains
theorem piecewise_insert_self {j : α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g j = f j := by simp [piecewise]
#align set.piecewise_insert_self Set.piecewise_insert_self
variable [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)]
-- TODO: move!
instance Compl.decidableMem (j : α) : Decidable (j ∈ sᶜ) :=
instDecidableNot
#align set.compl.decidable_mem Set.Compl.decidableMem
theorem piecewise_insert [DecidableEq α] (j : α) [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g = Function.update (s.piecewise f g) j (f j) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [piecewise, mem_insert_iff]
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· rw [h]
simp
· by_cases h' : i ∈ s <;> simp [h, h']
#align set.piecewise_insert Set.piecewise_insert
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_eq_of_mem {i : α} (hi : i ∈ s) : s.piecewise f g i = f i :=
if_pos hi
#align set.piecewise_eq_of_mem Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_eq_of_not_mem {i : α} (hi : i ∉ s) : s.piecewise f g i = g i :=
if_neg hi
#align set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem
theorem piecewise_singleton (x : α) [∀ y, Decidable (y ∈ ({x} : Set α))] [DecidableEq α]
(f g : α → β) : piecewise {x} f g = Function.update g x (f x) := by
ext y
by_cases hy : y = x
· subst y
simp
· simp [hy]
#align set.piecewise_singleton Set.piecewise_singleton
theorem piecewise_eqOn (f g : α → β) : EqOn (s.piecewise f g) f s := fun _ =>
piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _
#align set.piecewise_eq_on Set.piecewise_eqOn
theorem piecewise_eqOn_compl (f g : α → β) : EqOn (s.piecewise f g) g sᶜ := fun _ =>
piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _
#align set.piecewise_eq_on_compl Set.piecewise_eqOn_compl
theorem piecewise_le {δ : α → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (δ i)] {s : Set α} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)]
{f₁ f₂ g : ∀ i, δ i} (h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f₁ i ≤ g i) (h₂ : ∀ i ∉ s, f₂ i ≤ g i) :
s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ≤ g := fun i => if h : i ∈ s then by simp [*] else by simp [*]
#align set.piecewise_le Set.piecewise_le
theorem le_piecewise {δ : α → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (δ i)] {s : Set α} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)]
{f₁ f₂ g : ∀ i, δ i} (h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ≤ f₁ i) (h₂ : ∀ i ∉ s, g i ≤ f₂ i) :
g ≤ s.piecewise f₁ f₂ :=
@piecewise_le α (fun i => (δ i)ᵒᵈ) _ s _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
#align set.le_piecewise Set.le_piecewise
theorem piecewise_le_piecewise {δ : α → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (δ i)] {s : Set α}
[∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, δ i} (h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f₁ i ≤ g₁ i)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∉ s, f₂ i ≤ g₂ i) : s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ≤ s.piecewise g₁ g₂ := by
apply piecewise_le <;> intros <;> simp [*]
#align set.piecewise_le_piecewise Set.piecewise_le_piecewise
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_insert_of_ne {i j : α} (h : i ≠ j) [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g i = s.piecewise f g i := by simp [piecewise, h]
#align set.piecewise_insert_of_ne Set.piecewise_insert_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_compl [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ sᶜ)] : sᶜ.piecewise f g = s.piecewise g f :=
funext fun x => if hx : x ∈ s then by simp [hx] else by simp [hx]
#align set.piecewise_compl Set.piecewise_compl
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_range_comp {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α) [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ range f)]
(g₁ g₂ : α → β) : (range f).piecewise g₁ g₂ ∘ f = g₁ ∘ f :=
(piecewise_eqOn ..).comp_eq
#align set.piecewise_range_comp Set.piecewise_range_comp
theorem MapsTo.piecewise_ite {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {f₁ f₂ : α → β}
[∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ s)] (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ (s₁ ∩ s) (t₁ ∩ t))
(h₂ : MapsTo f₂ (s₂ ∩ sᶜ) (t₂ ∩ tᶜ)) :
MapsTo (s.piecewise f₁ f₂) (s.ite s₁ s₂) (t.ite t₁ t₂) := by
refine (h₁.congr ?_).union_union (h₂.congr ?_)
exacts [(piecewise_eqOn s f₁ f₂).symm.mono inter_subset_right,
(piecewise_eqOn_compl s f₁ f₂).symm.mono inter_subset_right]
#align set.maps_to.piecewise_ite Set.MapsTo.piecewise_ite
theorem eqOn_piecewise {f f' g : α → β} {t} :
EqOn (s.piecewise f f') g t ↔ EqOn f g (t ∩ s) ∧ EqOn f' g (t ∩ sᶜ) := by
simp only [EqOn, ← forall_and]
refine forall_congr' fun a => ?_; by_cases a ∈ s <;> simp [*]
#align set.eq_on_piecewise Set.eqOn_piecewise
theorem EqOn.piecewise_ite' {f f' g : α → β} {t t'} (h : EqOn f g (t ∩ s))
(h' : EqOn f' g (t' ∩ sᶜ)) : EqOn (s.piecewise f f') g (s.ite t t') := by
simp [eqOn_piecewise, *]
#align set.eq_on.piecewise_ite' Set.EqOn.piecewise_ite'
theorem EqOn.piecewise_ite {f f' g : α → β} {t t'} (h : EqOn f g t) (h' : EqOn f' g t') :
EqOn (s.piecewise f f') g (s.ite t t') :=
(h.mono inter_subset_left).piecewise_ite' s (h'.mono inter_subset_left)
#align set.eq_on.piecewise_ite Set.EqOn.piecewise_ite
theorem piecewise_preimage (f g : α → β) (t) : s.piecewise f g ⁻¹' t = s.ite (f ⁻¹' t) (g ⁻¹' t) :=
ext fun x => by by_cases x ∈ s <;> simp [*, Set.ite]
#align set.piecewise_preimage Set.piecewise_preimage
theorem apply_piecewise {δ' : α → Sort*} (h : ∀ i, δ i → δ' i) {x : α} :
h x (s.piecewise f g x) = s.piecewise (fun x => h x (f x)) (fun x => h x (g x)) x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
#align set.apply_piecewise Set.apply_piecewise
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 1,659 | 1,663 | theorem apply_piecewise₂ {δ' δ'' : α → Sort*} (f' g' : ∀ i, δ' i) (h : ∀ i, δ i → δ' i → δ'' i)
{x : α} :
h x (s.piecewise f g x) (s.piecewise f' g' x) =
s.piecewise (fun x => h x (f x) (f' x)) (fun x => h x (g x) (g' x)) x := by |
by_cases hx : x ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Algebra.Monoid
#align_import geometry.manifold.algebra.lie_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f9ec187127cc5b381dfcf5f4a22dacca4c20b63d"
/-!
# Lie groups
A Lie group is a group that is also a smooth manifold, in which the group operations of
multiplication and inversion are smooth maps. Smoothness of the group multiplication means that
multiplication is a smooth mapping of the product manifold `G` × `G` into `G`.
Note that, since a manifold here is not second-countable and Hausdorff a Lie group here is not
guaranteed to be second-countable (even though it can be proved it is Hausdorff). Note also that Lie
groups here are not necessarily finite dimensional.
## Main definitions
* `LieAddGroup I G` : a Lie additive group where `G` is a manifold on the model with corners `I`.
* `LieGroup I G` : a Lie multiplicative group where `G` is a manifold on the model with corners `I`.
* `SmoothInv₀`: typeclass for smooth manifolds with `0` and `Inv` such that inversion is a smooth
map at each non-zero point. This includes complete normed fields and (multiplicative) Lie groups.
## Main results
* `ContMDiff.inv`, `ContMDiff.div` and variants: point-wise inversion and division of maps `M → G`
is smooth
* `ContMDiff.inv₀` and variants: if `SmoothInv₀ N`, point-wise inversion of smooth maps `f : M → N`
is smooth at all points at which `f` doesn't vanish.
* `ContMDiff.div₀` and variants: if also `SmoothMul N` (i.e., `N` is a Lie group except possibly
for smoothness of inversion at `0`), similar results hold for point-wise division.
* `normedSpaceLieAddGroup` : a normed vector space over a nontrivially normed field
is an additive Lie group.
* `Instances/UnitsOfNormedAlgebra` shows that the group of units of a complete normed `𝕜`-algebra
is a multiplicative Lie group.
## Implementation notes
A priori, a Lie group here is a manifold with corners.
The definition of Lie group cannot require `I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E` with the same space as the
model space and as the model vector space, as one might hope, beause in the product situation,
the model space is `ModelProd E E'` and the model vector space is `E × E'`, which are not the same,
so the definition does not apply. Hence the definition should be more general, allowing
`I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
/-- An additive Lie group is a group and a smooth manifold at the same time in which
the addition and negation operations are smooth. -/
class LieAddGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] extends SmoothAdd I G : Prop where
/-- Negation is smooth in an additive Lie group. -/
smooth_neg : Smooth I I fun a : G => -a
#align lie_add_group LieAddGroup
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
/-- A (multiplicative) Lie group is a group and a smooth manifold at the same time in which
the multiplication and inverse operations are smooth. -/
@[to_additive]
class LieGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] extends SmoothMul I G : Prop where
/-- Inversion is smooth in a Lie group. -/
smooth_inv : Smooth I I fun a : G => a⁻¹
#align lie_group LieGroup
/-!
### Smoothness of inversion, negation, division and subtraction
Let `f : M → G` be a `C^n` or smooth functions into a Lie group, then `f` is point-wise
invertible with smooth inverse `f`. If `f` and `g` are two such functions, the quotient
`f / g` (i.e., the point-wise product of `f` and the point-wise inverse of `g`) is also smooth. -/
section PointwiseDivision
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F F} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Group G] [LieGroup I G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H'' M']
{n : ℕ∞}
section
variable (I)
/-- In a Lie group, inversion is a smooth map. -/
@[to_additive "In an additive Lie group, inversion is a smooth map."]
theorem smooth_inv : Smooth I I fun x : G => x⁻¹ :=
LieGroup.smooth_inv
#align smooth_inv smooth_inv
#align smooth_neg smooth_neg
/-- A Lie group is a topological group. This is not an instance for technical reasons,
see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]. -/
@[to_additive "An additive Lie group is an additive topological group. This is not an instance for
technical reasons, see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]."]
theorem topologicalGroup_of_lieGroup : TopologicalGroup G :=
{ continuousMul_of_smooth I with continuous_inv := (smooth_inv I).continuous }
#align topological_group_of_lie_group topologicalGroup_of_lieGroup
#align topological_add_group_of_lie_add_group topologicalAddGroup_of_lieAddGroup
end
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s x₀ :=
((smooth_inv I).of_le le_top).contMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt.comp x₀ hf <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.inv ContMDiffWithinAt.inv
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.neg ContMDiffWithinAt.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffAt.inv {f : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀) :
ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) x₀ :=
((smooth_inv I).of_le le_top).contMDiffAt.comp x₀ hf
#align cont_mdiff_at.inv ContMDiffAt.inv
#align cont_mdiff_at.neg ContMDiffAt.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffOn.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) :
ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.inv ContMDiffOn.inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.neg ContMDiffOn.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiff.inv {f : M → G} (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) : ContMDiff I' I n fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
fun x => (hf x).inv
#align cont_mdiff.inv ContMDiff.inv
#align cont_mdiff.neg ContMDiff.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothWithinAt.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : SmoothWithinAt I' I f s x₀) : SmoothWithinAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s x₀ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_within_at.inv SmoothWithinAt.inv
#align smooth_within_at.neg SmoothWithinAt.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothAt.inv {f : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : SmoothAt I' I f x₀) :
SmoothAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) x₀ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_at.inv SmoothAt.inv
#align smooth_at.neg SmoothAt.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothOn.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : SmoothOn I' I f s) :
SmoothOn I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_on.inv SmoothOn.inv
#align smooth_on.neg SmoothOn.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem Smooth.inv {f : M → G} (hf : Smooth I' I f) : Smooth I' I fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth.inv Smooth.inv
#align smooth.neg Smooth.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) (hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n g s x₀) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) s x₀ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.div ContMDiffWithinAt.div
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.sub ContMDiffWithinAt.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffAt.div {f g : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀)
(hg : ContMDiffAt I' I n g x₀) : ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) x₀ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff_at.div ContMDiffAt.div
#align cont_mdiff_at.sub ContMDiffAt.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffOn.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s)
(hg : ContMDiffOn I' I n g s) : ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) s := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.div ContMDiffOn.div
#align cont_mdiff_on.sub ContMDiffOn.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiff.div {f g : M → G} (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) (hg : ContMDiff I' I n g) :
ContMDiff I' I n fun x => f x / g x := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff.div ContMDiff.div
#align cont_mdiff.sub ContMDiff.sub
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothWithinAt.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : SmoothWithinAt I' I f s x₀) (hg : SmoothWithinAt I' I g s x₀) :
SmoothWithinAt I' I (fun x => f x / g x) s x₀ :=
hf.div hg
#align smooth_within_at.div SmoothWithinAt.div
#align smooth_within_at.sub SmoothWithinAt.sub
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothAt.div {f g : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : SmoothAt I' I f x₀)
(hg : SmoothAt I' I g x₀) : SmoothAt I' I (fun x => f x / g x) x₀ :=
hf.div hg
#align smooth_at.div SmoothAt.div
#align smooth_at.sub SmoothAt.sub
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothOn.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : SmoothOn I' I f s)
(hg : SmoothOn I' I g s) : SmoothOn I' I (f / g) s :=
hf.div hg
#align smooth_on.div SmoothOn.div
#align smooth_on.sub SmoothOn.sub
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem Smooth.div {f g : M → G} (hf : Smooth I' I f) (hg : Smooth I' I g) :
Smooth I' I (f / g) :=
hf.div hg
#align smooth.div Smooth.div
#align smooth.sub Smooth.sub
end PointwiseDivision
/-! Binary product of Lie groups -/
section Product
-- Instance of product group
@[to_additive]
instance {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Group G] [LieGroup I G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] [ChartedSpace H' G']
[Group G'] [LieGroup I' G'] : LieGroup (I.prod I') (G × G') :=
{ SmoothMul.prod _ _ _ _ with smooth_inv := smooth_fst.inv.prod_mk smooth_snd.inv }
end Product
/-! ### Normed spaces are Lie groups -/
instance normedSpaceLieAddGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : LieAddGroup 𝓘(𝕜, E) E where
smooth_neg := contDiff_neg.contMDiff
#align normed_space_lie_add_group normedSpaceLieAddGroup
/-! ## Smooth manifolds with smooth inversion away from zero
Typeclass for smooth manifolds with `0` and `Inv` such that inversion is smooth at all non-zero
points. (This includes multiplicative Lie groups, but also complete normed semifields.)
Point-wise inversion is smooth when the function/denominator is non-zero. -/
section SmoothInv₀
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
/-- A smooth manifold with `0` and `Inv` such that `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is smooth at all nonzero points.
Any complete normed (semi)field has this property. -/
class SmoothInv₀ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[Inv G] [Zero G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] : Prop where
/-- Inversion is smooth away from `0`. -/
smoothAt_inv₀ : ∀ ⦃x : G⦄, x ≠ 0 → SmoothAt I I (fun y ↦ y⁻¹) x
instance {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [CompleteSpace 𝕜] : SmoothInv₀ 𝓘(𝕜) 𝕜 :=
{ smoothAt_inv₀ := by
intro x hx
change ContMDiffAt 𝓘(𝕜) 𝓘(𝕜) ⊤ Inv.inv x
rw [contMDiffAt_iff_contDiffAt]
exact contDiffAt_inv 𝕜 hx }
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Inv G] [Zero G] [SmoothInv₀ I G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
{n : ℕ∞} {f g : M → G}
theorem smoothAt_inv₀ {x : G} (hx : x ≠ 0) : SmoothAt I I (fun y ↦ y⁻¹) x :=
SmoothInv₀.smoothAt_inv₀ hx
/-- In a manifold with smooth inverse away from `0`, the inverse is continuous away from `0`.
This is not an instance for technical reasons, see
note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]. -/
theorem hasContinuousInv₀_of_hasSmoothInv₀ : HasContinuousInv₀ G :=
{ continuousAt_inv₀ := fun _ hx ↦ (smoothAt_inv₀ I hx).continuousAt }
theorem SmoothOn_inv₀ : SmoothOn I I (Inv.inv : G → G) {0}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(smoothAt_inv₀ I hx).smoothWithinAt
variable {I} {s : Set M} {a : M}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s a :=
(smoothAt_inv₀ I ha).contMDiffAt.comp_contMDiffWithinAt a hf
theorem ContMDiffAt.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) a :=
(smoothAt_inv₀ I ha).contMDiffAt.comp a hf
theorem ContMDiff.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
ContMDiff I' I n (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) :=
fun x ↦ ContMDiffAt.inv₀ (hf x) (h0 x)
theorem ContMDiffOn.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s :=
fun x hx ↦ ContMDiffWithinAt.inv₀ (hf x hx) (h0 x hx)
theorem SmoothWithinAt.inv₀ (hf : SmoothWithinAt I' I f s a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
SmoothWithinAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s a :=
ContMDiffWithinAt.inv₀ hf ha
theorem SmoothAt.inv₀ (hf : SmoothAt I' I f a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
SmoothAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) a :=
ContMDiffAt.inv₀ hf ha
theorem Smooth.inv₀ (hf : Smooth I' I f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Smooth I' I fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
ContMDiff.inv₀ hf h0
theorem SmoothOn.inv₀ (hf : SmoothOn I' I f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
SmoothOn I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s :=
ContMDiffOn.inv₀ hf h0
end SmoothInv₀
/-! ### Point-wise division of smooth functions
If `[SmoothMul I N]` and `[SmoothInv₀ I N]`, point-wise division of smooth functions `f : M → N`
is smooth whenever the denominator is non-zero. (This includes `N` being a completely normed field.)
-/
section Div
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [GroupWithZero G] [SmoothInv₀ I G] [SmoothMul I G]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
{f g : M → G} {s : Set M} {a : M} {n : ℕ∞}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.div₀
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s a) (hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n g s a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (f / g) s a := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
theorem ContMDiffOn.div₀ (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) (hg : ContMDiffOn I' I n g s)
(h₀ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0) : ContMDiffOn I' I n (f / g) s := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Algebra/LieGroup.lean | 351 | 353 | theorem ContMDiffAt.div₀ (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f a) (hg : ContMDiffAt I' I n g a)
(h₀ : g a ≠ 0) : ContMDiffAt I' I n (f / g) a := by |
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Basic
/-!
# Independence with respect to a kernel and a measure
A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is independent with respect to a kernel
`κ : kernel α Ω` and a measure `μ` on `α` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`,
for any sets `f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then for `μ`-almost every `a : α`,
`κ a (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i)`.
This notion of independence is a generalization of both independence and conditional independence.
For conditional independence, `κ` is the conditional kernel `ProbabilityTheory.condexpKernel` and
`μ` is the ambiant measure. For (non-conditional) independence, `κ = kernel.const Unit μ` and the
measure is the Dirac measure on `Unit`.
The main purpose of this file is to prove only once the properties that hold for both conditional
and non-conditional independence.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepSets`: independence of a family of sets of sets.
Variant for two sets of sets: `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepSets`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndep`: independence of a family of σ-algebras. Variant for two
σ-algebras: `Indep`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepSet`: independence of a family of sets. Variant for two sets:
`ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepSet`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepFun`: independence of a family of functions (random variables).
Variant for two functions: `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepFun`.
See the file `Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Basic.lean` for a more detailed discussion of these
definitions in the particular case of the usual independence notion.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.iIndepSets.iIndep`: if π-systems are independent as sets of sets,
then the measurable space structures they generate are independent.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IndepSets.Indep`: variant with two π-systems.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory.kernel
variable {α Ω ι : Type*}
section Definitions
variable {_mα : MeasurableSpace α}
/-- A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is independent with respect to a kernel `κ` and
a measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then `∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i)`.
It will be used for families of pi_systems. -/
def iIndepSets {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
(π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (κ : kernel α Ω) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω} (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i),
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i)
/-- Two sets of sets `s₁, s₂` are independent with respect to a kernel `κ` and a measure `μ` if for
any sets `t₁ ∈ s₁, t₂ ∈ s₂`, then `∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (t₁ ∩ t₂) = κ a (t₁) * κ a (t₂)` -/
def IndepSets {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
(s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (κ : kernel α Ω) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ t1 t2 : Set Ω, t1 ∈ s1 → t2 ∈ s2 → (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (t1 ∩ t2) = κ a t1 * κ a t2)
/-- A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
kernel `κ` and a measure `μ` if the family of sets of measurable sets they define is independent. -/
def iIndep (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
iIndepSets (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) κ μ
/-- Two measurable space structures (or σ-algebras) `m₁, m₂` are independent with respect to a
kernel `κ` and a measure `μ` if for any sets `t₁ ∈ m₁, t₂ ∈ m₂`,
`∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (t₁ ∩ t₂) = κ a (t₁) * κ a (t₂)` -/
def Indep (m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
IndepSets {s | MeasurableSet[m₁] s} {s | MeasurableSet[m₂] s} κ μ
/-- A family of sets is independent if the family of measurable space structures they generate is
independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def iIndepSet {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (s : ι → Set Ω) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
iIndep (fun i ↦ generateFrom {s i}) κ μ
/-- Two sets are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are independent.
For a set `s`, the generated measurable space structure has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def IndepSet {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (s t : Set Ω) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (generateFrom {s}) (generateFrom {t}) κ μ
/-- A family of functions defined on the same space `Ω` and taking values in possibly different
spaces, each with a measurable space structure, is independent if the family of measurable space
structures they generate on `Ω` is independent. For a function `g` with codomain having measurable
space structure `m`, the generated measurable space structure is `MeasurableSpace.comap g m`. -/
def iIndepFun {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {β : ι → Type*} (m : ∀ x : ι, MeasurableSpace (β x))
(f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
iIndep (fun x ↦ MeasurableSpace.comap (f x) (m x)) κ μ
/-- Two functions are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are
independent. For a function `f` with codomain having measurable space structure `m`, the generated
measurable space structure is `MeasurableSpace.comap f m`. -/
def IndepFun {β γ} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [mγ : MeasurableSpace γ]
(f : Ω → β) (g : Ω → γ) (κ : kernel α Ω)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (MeasurableSpace.comap f mβ) (MeasurableSpace.comap g mγ) κ μ
end Definitions
section ByDefinition
variable {β : ι → Type*} {mβ : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (β i)}
{_mα : MeasurableSpace α} {m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α}
{π : ι → Set (Set Ω)} {s : ι → Set Ω} {S : Finset ι} {f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x}
lemma iIndepSets.meas_biInter (h : iIndepSets π κ μ) (s : Finset ι)
{f : ι → Set Ω} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, κ a (f i) := h s hf
lemma iIndepSets.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (h : iIndepSets π κ μ) (hs : ∀ i, s i ∈ π i) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, κ a (s i) := by
filter_upwards [h.meas_biInter Finset.univ (fun _i _ ↦ hs _)] with a ha using by simp [← ha]
lemma iIndep.iIndepSets' (hμ : iIndep m κ μ) :
iIndepSets (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) κ μ := hμ
lemma iIndep.meas_biInter (hμ : iIndep m κ μ) (hs : ∀ i, i ∈ S → MeasurableSet[m i] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ S, s i) = ∏ i ∈ S, κ a (s i) := hμ _ hs
lemma iIndep.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (h : iIndep m κ μ) (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[m i] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, κ a (s i) := by
filter_upwards [h.meas_biInter (fun i (_ : i ∈ Finset.univ) ↦ hs _)] with a ha
simp [← ha]
protected lemma iIndepFun.iIndep (hf : iIndepFun mβ f κ μ) :
iIndep (fun x ↦ (mβ x).comap (f x)) κ μ := hf
lemma iIndepFun.meas_biInter (hf : iIndepFun mβ f κ μ)
(hs : ∀ i, i ∈ S → MeasurableSet[(mβ i).comap (f i)] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i ∈ S, s i) = ∏ i ∈ S, κ a (s i) := hf.iIndep.meas_biInter hs
lemma iIndepFun.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (hf : iIndepFun mβ f κ μ)
(hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[(mβ i).comap (f i)] (s i)) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, κ a (s i) := hf.iIndep.meas_iInter hs
lemma IndepFun.meas_inter {β γ : Type*} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [mγ : MeasurableSpace γ]
{f : Ω → β} {g : Ω → γ} (hfg : IndepFun f g κ μ)
{s t : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[mβ.comap f] s) (ht : MeasurableSet[mγ.comap g] t) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, κ a (s ∩ t) = κ a s * κ a t := hfg _ _ hs ht
end ByDefinition
section Indep
variable {_mα : MeasurableSpace α}
@[symm]
theorem IndepSets.symm {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α}
{s₁ s₂ : Set (Set Ω)} (h : IndepSets s₁ s₂ κ μ) :
IndepSets s₂ s₁ κ μ := by
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2
filter_upwards [h t2 t1 ht2 ht1] with a ha
rwa [Set.inter_comm, mul_comm]
@[symm]
theorem Indep.symm {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {κ : kernel α Ω}
{μ : Measure α} (h : Indep m₁ m₂ κ μ) :
Indep m₂ m₁ κ μ :=
IndepSets.symm h
theorem indep_bot_right (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} [IsMarkovKernel κ] :
Indep m' ⊥ κ μ := by
intros s t _ ht
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_bot_iff] at ht
refine Filter.eventually_of_forall (fun a ↦ ?_)
cases' ht with ht ht
· rw [ht, Set.inter_empty, measure_empty, mul_zero]
· rw [ht, Set.inter_univ, measure_univ, mul_one]
theorem indep_bot_left (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} [IsMarkovKernel κ] :
Indep ⊥ m' κ μ := (indep_bot_right m').symm
| Mathlib/Probability/Independence/Kernel.lean | 193 | 197 | theorem indepSet_empty_right {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
{κ : kernel α Ω} {μ : Measure α} [IsMarkovKernel κ] (s : Set Ω) :
IndepSet s ∅ κ μ := by |
simp only [IndepSet, generateFrom_singleton_empty];
exact indep_bot_right _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Deprecated.Group
#align_import deprecated.submonoid from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"509de852e1de55e1efa8eacfa11df0823f26f226"
/-!
# Unbundled submonoids (deprecated)
This file is deprecated, and is no longer imported by anything in mathlib other than other
deprecated files, and test files. You should not need to import it.
This file defines unbundled multiplicative and additive submonoids. Instead of using this file,
please use `Submonoid G` and `AddSubmonoid A`, defined in `GroupTheory.Submonoid.Basic`.
## Main definitions
`IsAddSubmonoid (S : Set M)` : the predicate that `S` is the underlying subset of an additive
submonoid of `M`. The bundled variant `AddSubmonoid M` should be used in preference to this.
`IsSubmonoid (S : Set M)` : the predicate that `S` is the underlying subset of a submonoid
of `M`. The bundled variant `Submonoid M` should be used in preference to this.
## Tags
Submonoid, Submonoids, IsSubmonoid
-/
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] {s : Set M}
variable {A : Type*} [AddMonoid A] {t : Set A}
/-- `s` is an additive submonoid: a set containing 0 and closed under addition.
Note that this structure is deprecated, and the bundled variant `AddSubmonoid A` should be
preferred. -/
structure IsAddSubmonoid (s : Set A) : Prop where
/-- The proposition that s contains 0. -/
zero_mem : (0 : A) ∈ s
/-- The proposition that s is closed under addition. -/
add_mem {a b} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a + b ∈ s
#align is_add_submonoid IsAddSubmonoid
/-- `s` is a submonoid: a set containing 1 and closed under multiplication.
Note that this structure is deprecated, and the bundled variant `Submonoid M` should be
preferred. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsSubmonoid (s : Set M) : Prop where
/-- The proposition that s contains 1. -/
one_mem : (1 : M) ∈ s
/-- The proposition that s is closed under multiplication. -/
mul_mem {a b} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a * b ∈ s
#align is_submonoid IsSubmonoid
theorem Additive.isAddSubmonoid {s : Set M} :
IsSubmonoid s → @IsAddSubmonoid (Additive M) _ s
| ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩
#align additive.is_add_submonoid Additive.isAddSubmonoid
theorem Additive.isAddSubmonoid_iff {s : Set M} :
@IsAddSubmonoid (Additive M) _ s ↔ IsSubmonoid s :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩, Additive.isAddSubmonoid⟩
#align additive.is_add_submonoid_iff Additive.isAddSubmonoid_iff
theorem Multiplicative.isSubmonoid {s : Set A} :
IsAddSubmonoid s → @IsSubmonoid (Multiplicative A) _ s
| ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩
#align multiplicative.is_submonoid Multiplicative.isSubmonoid
theorem Multiplicative.isSubmonoid_iff {s : Set A} :
@IsSubmonoid (Multiplicative A) _ s ↔ IsAddSubmonoid s :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩, Multiplicative.isSubmonoid⟩
#align multiplicative.is_submonoid_iff Multiplicative.isSubmonoid_iff
/-- The intersection of two submonoids of a monoid `M` is a submonoid of `M`. -/
@[to_additive
"The intersection of two `AddSubmonoid`s of an `AddMonoid` `M` is an `AddSubmonoid` of M."]
theorem IsSubmonoid.inter {s₁ s₂ : Set M} (is₁ : IsSubmonoid s₁) (is₂ : IsSubmonoid s₂) :
IsSubmonoid (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
{ one_mem := ⟨is₁.one_mem, is₂.one_mem⟩
mul_mem := @fun _ _ hx hy => ⟨is₁.mul_mem hx.1 hy.1, is₂.mul_mem hx.2 hy.2⟩ }
#align is_submonoid.inter IsSubmonoid.inter
#align is_add_submonoid.inter IsAddSubmonoid.inter
/-- The intersection of an indexed set of submonoids of a monoid `M` is a submonoid of `M`. -/
@[to_additive
"The intersection of an indexed set of `AddSubmonoid`s of an `AddMonoid` `M` is
an `AddSubmonoid` of `M`."]
theorem IsSubmonoid.iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set M} (h : ∀ y : ι, IsSubmonoid (s y)) :
IsSubmonoid (Set.iInter s) :=
{ one_mem := Set.mem_iInter.2 fun y => (h y).one_mem
mul_mem := fun h₁ h₂ =>
Set.mem_iInter.2 fun y => (h y).mul_mem (Set.mem_iInter.1 h₁ y) (Set.mem_iInter.1 h₂ y) }
#align is_submonoid.Inter IsSubmonoid.iInter
#align is_add_submonoid.Inter IsAddSubmonoid.iInter
/-- The union of an indexed, directed, nonempty set of submonoids of a monoid `M` is a submonoid
of `M`. -/
@[to_additive
"The union of an indexed, directed, nonempty set of `AddSubmonoid`s of an `AddMonoid` `M`
is an `AddSubmonoid` of `M`. "]
theorem isSubmonoid_iUnion_of_directed {ι : Type*} [hι : Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set M}
(hs : ∀ i, IsSubmonoid (s i)) (Directed : ∀ i j, ∃ k, s i ⊆ s k ∧ s j ⊆ s k) :
IsSubmonoid (⋃ i, s i) :=
{ one_mem :=
let ⟨i⟩ := hι
Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, (hs i).one_mem⟩
mul_mem := fun ha hb =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.1 ha
let ⟨j, hj⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.1 hb
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := Directed i j
Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨k, (hs k).mul_mem (hk.1 hi) (hk.2 hj)⟩ }
#align is_submonoid_Union_of_directed isSubmonoid_iUnion_of_directed
#align is_add_submonoid_Union_of_directed isAddSubmonoid_iUnion_of_directed
section powers
/-- The set of natural number powers `1, x, x², ...` of an element `x` of a monoid. -/
@[to_additive
"The set of natural number multiples `0, x, 2x, ...` of an element `x` of an `AddMonoid`."]
def powers (x : M) : Set M :=
{ y | ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ n = y }
#align powers powers
#align multiples multiples
/-- 1 is in the set of natural number powers of an element of a monoid. -/
@[to_additive "0 is in the set of natural number multiples of an element of an `AddMonoid`."]
theorem powers.one_mem {x : M} : (1 : M) ∈ powers x :=
⟨0, pow_zero _⟩
#align powers.one_mem powers.one_mem
#align multiples.zero_mem multiples.zero_mem
/-- An element of a monoid is in the set of that element's natural number powers. -/
@[to_additive
"An element of an `AddMonoid` is in the set of that element's natural number multiples."]
theorem powers.self_mem {x : M} : x ∈ powers x :=
⟨1, pow_one _⟩
#align powers.self_mem powers.self_mem
#align multiples.self_mem multiples.self_mem
/-- The set of natural number powers of an element of a monoid is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive
"The set of natural number multiples of an element of an `AddMonoid` is closed under
addition."]
theorem powers.mul_mem {x y z : M} : y ∈ powers x → z ∈ powers x → y * z ∈ powers x :=
fun ⟨n₁, h₁⟩ ⟨n₂, h₂⟩ => ⟨n₁ + n₂, by simp only [pow_add, *]⟩
#align powers.mul_mem powers.mul_mem
#align multiples.add_mem multiples.add_mem
/-- The set of natural number powers of an element of a monoid `M` is a submonoid of `M`. -/
@[to_additive
"The set of natural number multiples of an element of an `AddMonoid` `M` is
an `AddSubmonoid` of `M`."]
theorem powers.isSubmonoid (x : M) : IsSubmonoid (powers x) :=
{ one_mem := powers.one_mem
mul_mem := powers.mul_mem }
#align powers.is_submonoid powers.isSubmonoid
#align multiples.is_add_submonoid multiples.isAddSubmonoid
/-- A monoid is a submonoid of itself. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddMonoid` is an `AddSubmonoid` of itself."]
theorem Univ.isSubmonoid : IsSubmonoid (@Set.univ M) := by constructor <;> simp
#align univ.is_submonoid Univ.isSubmonoid
#align univ.is_add_submonoid Univ.isAddSubmonoid
/-- The preimage of a submonoid under a monoid hom is a submonoid of the domain. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of an `AddSubmonoid` under an `AddMonoid` hom is
an `AddSubmonoid` of the domain."]
theorem IsSubmonoid.preimage {N : Type*} [Monoid N] {f : M → N} (hf : IsMonoidHom f) {s : Set N}
(hs : IsSubmonoid s) : IsSubmonoid (f ⁻¹' s) :=
{ one_mem := show f 1 ∈ s by (rw [IsMonoidHom.map_one hf]; exact hs.one_mem)
mul_mem := fun {a b} (ha : f a ∈ s) (hb : f b ∈ s) =>
show f (a * b) ∈ s by (rw [IsMonoidHom.map_mul' hf]; exact hs.mul_mem ha hb) }
#align is_submonoid.preimage IsSubmonoid.preimage
#align is_add_submonoid.preimage IsAddSubmonoid.preimage
/-- The image of a submonoid under a monoid hom is a submonoid of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of an `AddSubmonoid` under an `AddMonoid` hom is an `AddSubmonoid` of the
codomain."]
theorem IsSubmonoid.image {γ : Type*} [Monoid γ] {f : M → γ} (hf : IsMonoidHom f) {s : Set M}
(hs : IsSubmonoid s) : IsSubmonoid (f '' s) :=
{ one_mem := ⟨1, hs.one_mem, hf.map_one⟩
mul_mem := @fun a b ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨x * y, hs.mul_mem hx.1 hy.1, by rw [hf.map_mul, hx.2, hy.2]⟩ }
#align is_submonoid.image IsSubmonoid.image
#align is_add_submonoid.image IsAddSubmonoid.image
/-- The image of a monoid hom is a submonoid of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an `AddMonoid` hom is an `AddSubmonoid` of the codomain."]
| Mathlib/Deprecated/Submonoid.lean | 195 | 198 | theorem Range.isSubmonoid {γ : Type*} [Monoid γ] {f : M → γ} (hf : IsMonoidHom f) :
IsSubmonoid (Set.range f) := by |
rw [← Set.image_univ]
exact Univ.isSubmonoid.image hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Integers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integer
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Bezout
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import ring_theory.valuation.valuation_ring from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c163ec99dfc664628ca15d215fce0a5b9c265b68"
/-!
# Valuation Rings
A valuation ring is a domain such that for every pair of elements `a b`, either `a` divides
`b` or vice-versa.
Any valuation ring induces a natural valuation on its fraction field, as we show in this file.
Namely, given the following instances:
`[CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [ValuationRing A] [Field K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]`,
there is a natural valuation `Valuation A K` on `K` with values in `value_group A K` where
the image of `A` under `algebraMap A K` agrees with `(Valuation A K).integer`.
We also provide the equivalence of the following notions for a domain `R` in `ValuationRing.tFAE`.
1. `R` is a valuation ring.
2. For each `x : FractionRing K`, either `x` or `x⁻¹` is in `R`.
3. "divides" is a total relation on the elements of `R`.
4. "contains" is a total relation on the ideals of `R`.
5. `R` is a local bezout domain.
-/
universe u v w
/-- An integral domain is called a `ValuationRing` provided that for any pair
of elements `a b : A`, either `a` divides `b` or vice versa. -/
class ValuationRing (A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] : Prop where
cond' : ∀ a b : A, ∃ c : A, a * c = b ∨ b * c = a
#align valuation_ring ValuationRing
-- Porting note: this lemma is needed since infer kinds are unsupported in Lean 4
lemma ValuationRing.cond {A : Type u} [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [ValuationRing A] (a b : A) :
∃ c : A, a * c = b ∨ b * c = a := @ValuationRing.cond' A _ _ _ _ _
namespace ValuationRing
section
variable (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
variable (K : Type v) [Field K] [Algebra A K]
/-- The value group of the valuation ring `A`. Note: this is actually a group with zero. -/
def ValueGroup : Type v := Quotient (MulAction.orbitRel Aˣ K)
#align valuation_ring.value_group ValuationRing.ValueGroup
instance : Inhabited (ValueGroup A K) := ⟨Quotient.mk'' 0⟩
instance : LE (ValueGroup A K) :=
LE.mk fun x y =>
Quotient.liftOn₂' x y (fun a b => ∃ c : A, c • b = a)
(by
rintro _ _ a b ⟨c, rfl⟩ ⟨d, rfl⟩; ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨e, he⟩; use (c⁻¹ : Aˣ) * e * d
apply_fun fun t => c⁻¹ • t at he
simpa [mul_smul] using he
· rintro ⟨e, he⟩; dsimp
use c * e * (d⁻¹ : Aˣ)
simp_rw [Units.smul_def, ← he, mul_smul]
rw [← mul_smul _ _ b, Units.inv_mul, one_smul])
instance : Zero (ValueGroup A K) := ⟨Quotient.mk'' 0⟩
instance : One (ValueGroup A K) := ⟨Quotient.mk'' 1⟩
instance : Mul (ValueGroup A K) :=
Mul.mk fun x y =>
Quotient.liftOn₂' x y (fun a b => Quotient.mk'' <| a * b)
(by
rintro _ _ a b ⟨c, rfl⟩ ⟨d, rfl⟩
apply Quotient.sound'
dsimp
use c * d
simp only [mul_smul, Algebra.smul_def, Units.smul_def, RingHom.map_mul, Units.val_mul]
ring)
instance : Inv (ValueGroup A K) :=
Inv.mk fun x =>
Quotient.liftOn' x (fun a => Quotient.mk'' a⁻¹)
(by
rintro _ a ⟨b, rfl⟩
apply Quotient.sound'
use b⁻¹
dsimp
rw [Units.smul_def, Units.smul_def, Algebra.smul_def, Algebra.smul_def, mul_inv,
map_units_inv])
variable [IsDomain A] [ValuationRing A] [IsFractionRing A K]
protected theorem le_total (a b : ValueGroup A K) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
rcases a with ⟨a⟩; rcases b with ⟨b⟩
obtain ⟨xa, ya, hya, rfl⟩ : ∃ a b : A, _ := IsFractionRing.div_surjective a
obtain ⟨xb, yb, hyb, rfl⟩ : ∃ a b : A, _ := IsFractionRing.div_surjective b
have : (algebraMap A K) ya ≠ 0 := IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hya
have : (algebraMap A K) yb ≠ 0 := IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hyb
obtain ⟨c, h | h⟩ := ValuationRing.cond (xa * yb) (xb * ya)
· right
use c
rw [Algebra.smul_def]
field_simp
simp only [← RingHom.map_mul, ← h]; congr 1; ring
· left
use c
rw [Algebra.smul_def]
field_simp
simp only [← RingHom.map_mul, ← h]; congr 1; ring
#align valuation_ring.le_total ValuationRing.le_total
-- Porting note: it is much faster to split the instance `LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero`
-- into two parts
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder (ValueGroup A K) where
le_refl := by rintro ⟨⟩; use 1; rw [one_smul]
le_trans := by rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ ⟨e, rfl⟩ ⟨f, rfl⟩; use e * f; rw [mul_smul]
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨e, rfl⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩
by_cases hb : b = 0; · simp [hb]
have : IsUnit e := by
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
use f
rw [mul_comm]
rw [← mul_smul, Algebra.smul_def] at hf
nth_rw 2 [← one_mul b] at hf
rw [← (algebraMap A K).map_one] at hf
exact IsFractionRing.injective _ _ (mul_right_cancel₀ hb hf).symm
apply Quotient.sound'
exact ⟨this.unit, rfl⟩
le_total := ValuationRing.le_total _ _
decidableLE := by classical infer_instance
noncomputable instance linearOrderedCommGroupWithZero :
LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero (ValueGroup A K) :=
{ linearOrder .. with
mul_assoc := by rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩; apply Quotient.sound'; rw [mul_assoc]; apply Setoid.refl'
one_mul := by rintro ⟨a⟩; apply Quotient.sound'; rw [one_mul]; apply Setoid.refl'
mul_one := by rintro ⟨a⟩; apply Quotient.sound'; rw [mul_one]; apply Setoid.refl'
mul_comm := by rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩; apply Quotient.sound'; rw [mul_comm]; apply Setoid.refl'
mul_le_mul_left := by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c, rfl⟩ ⟨d⟩
use c; simp only [Algebra.smul_def]; ring
zero_mul := by rintro ⟨a⟩; apply Quotient.sound'; rw [zero_mul]; apply Setoid.refl'
mul_zero := by rintro ⟨a⟩; apply Quotient.sound'; rw [mul_zero]; apply Setoid.refl'
zero_le_one := ⟨0, by rw [zero_smul]⟩
exists_pair_ne := by
use 0, 1
intro c; obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := Quotient.exact' c
apply_fun fun t => d⁻¹ • t at hd
simp only [inv_smul_smul, smul_zero, one_ne_zero] at hd
inv_zero := by apply Quotient.sound'; rw [inv_zero]; apply Setoid.refl'
mul_inv_cancel := by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ha
apply Quotient.sound'
use 1
simp only [one_smul, ne_eq]
apply (mul_inv_cancel _).symm
contrapose ha
simp only [Classical.not_not] at ha ⊢
rw [ha]
rfl }
/-- Any valuation ring induces a valuation on its fraction field. -/
def valuation : Valuation K (ValueGroup A K) where
toFun := Quotient.mk''
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_add_le_max' := by
intro a b
obtain ⟨xa, ya, hya, rfl⟩ : ∃ a b : A, _ := IsFractionRing.div_surjective a
obtain ⟨xb, yb, hyb, rfl⟩ : ∃ a b : A, _ := IsFractionRing.div_surjective b
have : (algebraMap A K) ya ≠ 0 := IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hya
have : (algebraMap A K) yb ≠ 0 := IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hyb
obtain ⟨c, h | h⟩ := ValuationRing.cond (xa * yb) (xb * ya)
· dsimp
apply le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)
use c + 1
rw [Algebra.smul_def]
field_simp
simp only [← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_add, ← (algebraMap A K).map_one, ← h]
congr 1; ring
· apply le_trans _ (le_max_right _ _)
use c + 1
rw [Algebra.smul_def]
field_simp
simp only [← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_add, ← (algebraMap A K).map_one, ← h]
congr 1; ring
#align valuation_ring.valuation ValuationRing.valuation
theorem mem_integer_iff (x : K) : x ∈ (valuation A K).integer ↔ ∃ a : A, algebraMap A K a = x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
use c
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
use c
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
#align valuation_ring.mem_integer_iff ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff
/-- The valuation ring `A` is isomorphic to the ring of integers of its associated valuation. -/
noncomputable def equivInteger : A ≃+* (valuation A K).integer :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective
(show A →ₙ+* (valuation A K).integer from
{ toFun := fun a => ⟨algebraMap A K a, (mem_integer_iff _ _ _).mpr ⟨a, rfl⟩⟩
map_mul' := fun _ _ => by ext1; exact (algebraMap A K).map_mul _ _
map_zero' := by ext1; exact (algebraMap A K).map_zero
map_add' := fun _ _ => by ext1; exact (algebraMap A K).map_add _ _ })
(by
constructor
· intro x y h
apply_fun (algebraMap (valuation A K).integer K) at h
exact IsFractionRing.injective _ _ h
· rintro ⟨-, ha⟩
rw [mem_integer_iff] at ha
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := ha
exact ⟨a, rfl⟩)
#align valuation_ring.equiv_integer ValuationRing.equivInteger
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivInteger_apply (a : A) : (equivInteger A K a : K) = algebraMap A K a := rfl
#align valuation_ring.coe_equiv_integer_apply ValuationRing.coe_equivInteger_apply
theorem range_algebraMap_eq : (valuation A K).integer = (algebraMap A K).range := by
ext; exact mem_integer_iff _ _ _
#align valuation_ring.range_algebra_map_eq ValuationRing.range_algebraMap_eq
end
section
variable (A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [ValuationRing A]
instance (priority := 100) localRing : LocalRing A :=
LocalRing.of_isUnit_or_isUnit_one_sub_self
(by
intro a
obtain ⟨c, h | h⟩ := ValuationRing.cond a (1 - a)
· left
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (c + 1)
simp [mul_add, h]
· right
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (c + 1)
simp [mul_add, h])
instance [DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : Ideal A → Ideal A → Prop)] : LinearOrder (Ideal A) :=
{ (inferInstance : CompleteLattice (Ideal A)) with
le_total := by
intro α β
by_cases h : α ≤ β; · exact Or.inl h
erw [not_forall] at h
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ := h
right
intro b hb
obtain ⟨c, h | h⟩ := ValuationRing.cond a b
· rw [← h]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ h₁
· exfalso; apply h₂; rw [← h]
apply Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ hb
decidableLE := inferInstance }
end
section
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {K : Type*}
variable [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/ValuationRing.lean | 282 | 286 | theorem iff_dvd_total : ValuationRing R ↔ IsTotal R (· ∣ ·) := by |
classical
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨fun a b => ?_⟩, fun H => ⟨fun a b => ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨c, rfl | rfl⟩ := ValuationRing.cond a b <;> simp
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ | ⟨c, rfl⟩ := @IsTotal.total _ _ H a b <;> use c <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
#align_import linear_algebra.std_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"13bce9a6b6c44f6b4c91ac1c1d2a816e2533d395"
/-!
# The standard basis
This file defines the standard basis `Pi.basis (s : ∀ j, Basis (ι j) R (M j))`,
which is the `Σ j, ι j`-indexed basis of `Π j, M j`. The basis vectors are given by
`Pi.basis s ⟨j, i⟩ j' = LinearMap.stdBasis R M j' (s j) i = if j = j' then s i else 0`.
The standard basis on `R^η`, i.e. `η → R` is called `Pi.basisFun`.
To give a concrete example, `LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun (i : Fin 3) ↦ R) i 1`
gives the `i`th unit basis vector in `R³`, and `Pi.basisFun R (Fin 3)` proves
this is a basis over `Fin 3 → R`.
## Main definitions
- `LinearMap.stdBasis R M`: if `x` is a basis vector of `M i`, then
`LinearMap.stdBasis R M i x` is the `i`th standard basis vector of `Π i, M i`.
- `Pi.basis s`: given a basis `s i` for each `M i`, the standard basis on `Π i, M i`
- `Pi.basisFun R η`: the standard basis on `R^η`, i.e. `η → R`, given by
`Pi.basisFun R η i j = if i = j then 1 else 0`.
- `Matrix.stdBasis R n m`: the standard basis on `Matrix n m R`, given by
`Matrix.stdBasis R n m (i, j) i' j' = if (i, j) = (i', j') then 1 else 0`.
-/
open Function Set Submodule
namespace LinearMap
variable (R : Type*) {ι : Type*} [Semiring R] (φ : ι → Type*) [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (φ i)]
[∀ i, Module R (φ i)] [DecidableEq ι]
/-- The standard basis of the product of `φ`. -/
def stdBasis : ∀ i : ι, φ i →ₗ[R] ∀ i, φ i :=
single
#align linear_map.std_basis LinearMap.stdBasis
theorem stdBasis_apply (i : ι) (b : φ i) : stdBasis R φ i b = update (0 : (a : ι) → φ a) i b :=
rfl
#align linear_map.std_basis_apply LinearMap.stdBasis_apply
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply' (i i' : ι) : (stdBasis R (fun _x : ι => R) i) 1 i' = ite (i = i') 1 0 := by
rw [LinearMap.stdBasis_apply, Function.update_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
congr 1; rw [eq_iff_iff, eq_comm]
#align linear_map.std_basis_apply' LinearMap.stdBasis_apply'
theorem coe_stdBasis (i : ι) : ⇑(stdBasis R φ i) = Pi.single i :=
rfl
#align linear_map.coe_std_basis LinearMap.coe_stdBasis
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_same (i : ι) (b : φ i) : stdBasis R φ i b i = b :=
Pi.single_eq_same i b
#align linear_map.std_basis_same LinearMap.stdBasis_same
theorem stdBasis_ne (i j : ι) (h : j ≠ i) (b : φ i) : stdBasis R φ i b j = 0 :=
Pi.single_eq_of_ne h b
#align linear_map.std_basis_ne LinearMap.stdBasis_ne
theorem stdBasis_eq_pi_diag (i : ι) : stdBasis R φ i = pi (diag i) := by
ext x j
-- Porting note: made types explicit
convert (update_apply (R := R) (φ := φ) (ι := ι) 0 x i j _).symm
rfl
#align linear_map.std_basis_eq_pi_diag LinearMap.stdBasis_eq_pi_diag
theorem ker_stdBasis (i : ι) : ker (stdBasis R φ i) = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot_of_injective <| Pi.single_injective _ _
#align linear_map.ker_std_basis LinearMap.ker_stdBasis
theorem proj_comp_stdBasis (i j : ι) : (proj i).comp (stdBasis R φ j) = diag j i := by
rw [stdBasis_eq_pi_diag, proj_pi]
#align linear_map.proj_comp_std_basis LinearMap.proj_comp_stdBasis
theorem proj_stdBasis_same (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (stdBasis R φ i) = id :=
LinearMap.ext <| stdBasis_same R φ i
#align linear_map.proj_std_basis_same LinearMap.proj_stdBasis_same
theorem proj_stdBasis_ne (i j : ι) (h : i ≠ j) : (proj i).comp (stdBasis R φ j) = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext <| stdBasis_ne R φ _ _ h
#align linear_map.proj_std_basis_ne LinearMap.proj_stdBasis_ne
theorem iSup_range_stdBasis_le_iInf_ker_proj (I J : Set ι) (h : Disjoint I J) :
⨆ i ∈ I, range (stdBasis R φ i) ≤ ⨅ i ∈ J, ker (proj i : (∀ i, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) := by
refine iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun hi => range_le_iff_comap.2 ?_
simp only [← ker_comp, eq_top_iff, SetLike.le_def, mem_ker, comap_iInf, mem_iInf]
rintro b - j hj
rw [proj_stdBasis_ne R φ j i, zero_apply]
rintro rfl
exact h.le_bot ⟨hi, hj⟩
#align linear_map.supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj LinearMap.iSup_range_stdBasis_le_iInf_ker_proj
theorem iInf_ker_proj_le_iSup_range_stdBasis {I : Finset ι} {J : Set ι} (hu : Set.univ ⊆ ↑I ∪ J) :
⨅ i ∈ J, ker (proj i : (∀ i, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) ≤ ⨆ i ∈ I, range (stdBasis R φ i) :=
SetLike.le_def.2
(by
intro b hb
simp only [mem_iInf, mem_ker, proj_apply] at hb
rw [←
show (∑ i ∈ I, stdBasis R φ i (b i)) = b by
ext i
rw [Finset.sum_apply, ← stdBasis_same R φ i (b i)]
refine Finset.sum_eq_single i (fun j _ ne => stdBasis_ne _ _ _ _ ne.symm _) ?_
intro hiI
rw [stdBasis_same]
exact hb _ ((hu trivial).resolve_left hiI)]
exact sum_mem_biSup fun i _ => mem_range_self (stdBasis R φ i) (b i))
#align linear_map.infi_ker_proj_le_supr_range_std_basis LinearMap.iInf_ker_proj_le_iSup_range_stdBasis
theorem iSup_range_stdBasis_eq_iInf_ker_proj {I J : Set ι} (hd : Disjoint I J)
(hu : Set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) (hI : Set.Finite I) :
⨆ i ∈ I, range (stdBasis R φ i) = ⨅ i ∈ J, ker (proj i : (∀ i, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_range_stdBasis_le_iInf_ker_proj _ _ _ _ hd) ?_
have : Set.univ ⊆ ↑hI.toFinset ∪ J := by rwa [hI.coe_toFinset]
refine le_trans (iInf_ker_proj_le_iSup_range_stdBasis R φ this) (iSup_mono fun i => ?_)
rw [Set.Finite.mem_toFinset]
#align linear_map.supr_range_std_basis_eq_infi_ker_proj LinearMap.iSup_range_stdBasis_eq_iInf_ker_proj
theorem iSup_range_stdBasis [Finite ι] : ⨆ i, range (stdBasis R φ i) = ⊤ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
convert top_unique (iInf_emptyset.ge.trans <| iInf_ker_proj_le_iSup_range_stdBasis R φ _)
· rename_i i
exact ((@iSup_pos _ _ _ fun _ => range <| stdBasis R φ i) <| Finset.mem_univ i).symm
· rw [Finset.coe_univ, Set.union_empty]
#align linear_map.supr_range_std_basis LinearMap.iSup_range_stdBasis
theorem disjoint_stdBasis_stdBasis (I J : Set ι) (h : Disjoint I J) :
Disjoint (⨆ i ∈ I, range (stdBasis R φ i)) (⨆ i ∈ J, range (stdBasis R φ i)) := by
refine
Disjoint.mono (iSup_range_stdBasis_le_iInf_ker_proj _ _ _ _ <| disjoint_compl_right)
(iSup_range_stdBasis_le_iInf_ker_proj _ _ _ _ <| disjoint_compl_right) ?_
simp only [disjoint_iff_inf_le, SetLike.le_def, mem_iInf, mem_inf, mem_ker, mem_bot, proj_apply,
funext_iff]
rintro b ⟨hI, hJ⟩ i
classical
by_cases hiI : i ∈ I
· by_cases hiJ : i ∈ J
· exact (h.le_bot ⟨hiI, hiJ⟩).elim
· exact hJ i hiJ
· exact hI i hiI
#align linear_map.disjoint_std_basis_std_basis LinearMap.disjoint_stdBasis_stdBasis
theorem stdBasis_eq_single {a : R} :
(fun i : ι => (stdBasis R (fun _ : ι => R) i) a) = fun i : ι => ↑(Finsupp.single i a) :=
funext fun i => (Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single i a).symm
#align linear_map.std_basis_eq_single LinearMap.stdBasis_eq_single
end LinearMap
namespace Pi
open LinearMap
open Set
variable {R : Type*}
section Module
variable {η : Type*} {ιs : η → Type*} {Ms : η → Type*}
theorem linearIndependent_stdBasis [Ring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (Ms i)] [∀ i, Module R (Ms i)]
[DecidableEq η] (v : ∀ j, ιs j → Ms j) (hs : ∀ i, LinearIndependent R (v i)) :
LinearIndependent R fun ji : Σj, ιs j => stdBasis R Ms ji.1 (v ji.1 ji.2) := by
have hs' : ∀ j : η, LinearIndependent R fun i : ιs j => stdBasis R Ms j (v j i) := by
intro j
exact (hs j).map' _ (ker_stdBasis _ _ _)
apply linearIndependent_iUnion_finite hs'
intro j J _ hiJ
have h₀ :
∀ j, span R (range fun i : ιs j => stdBasis R Ms j (v j i)) ≤
LinearMap.range (stdBasis R Ms j) := by
intro j
rw [span_le, LinearMap.range_coe]
apply range_comp_subset_range
have h₁ :
span R (range fun i : ιs j => stdBasis R Ms j (v j i)) ≤
⨆ i ∈ ({j} : Set _), LinearMap.range (stdBasis R Ms i) := by
rw [@iSup_singleton _ _ _ fun i => LinearMap.range (stdBasis R (Ms) i)]
apply h₀
have h₂ :
⨆ j ∈ J, span R (range fun i : ιs j => stdBasis R Ms j (v j i)) ≤
⨆ j ∈ J, LinearMap.range (stdBasis R (fun j : η => Ms j) j) :=
iSup₂_mono fun i _ => h₀ i
have h₃ : Disjoint (fun i : η => i ∈ ({j} : Set _)) J := by
convert Set.disjoint_singleton_left.2 hiJ using 0
exact (disjoint_stdBasis_stdBasis _ _ _ _ h₃).mono h₁ h₂
#align pi.linear_independent_std_basis Pi.linearIndependent_stdBasis
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Ms i)] [∀ i, Module R (Ms i)]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype η]
open LinearEquiv
/-- `Pi.basis (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j))` is the `Σ j, ιs j`-indexed basis on `Π j, Ms j`
given by `s j` on each component.
For the standard basis over `R` on the finite-dimensional space `η → R` see `Pi.basisFun`.
-/
protected noncomputable def basis (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) :
Basis (Σj, ιs j) R (∀ j, Ms j) :=
Basis.ofRepr
((LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun j => (s j).repr) ≪≫ₗ
(Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppLEquivPiFinsupp R).symm)
-- Porting note: was
-- -- The `AddCommMonoid (Π j, Ms j)` instance was hard to find.
-- -- Defining this in tactic mode seems to shake up instance search enough
-- -- that it works by itself.
-- refine Basis.ofRepr (?_ ≪≫ₗ (Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppLEquivPiFinsupp R).symm)
-- exact LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun j => (s j).repr
#align pi.basis Pi.basis
@[simp]
theorem basis_repr_stdBasis [DecidableEq η] (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) (j i) :
(Pi.basis s).repr (stdBasis R _ j (s j i)) = Finsupp.single ⟨j, i⟩ 1 := by
ext ⟨j', i'⟩
by_cases hj : j = j'
· subst hj
-- Porting note: needed to add more lemmas
simp only [Pi.basis, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Basis.repr_self, stdBasis_same,
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight, Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppLEquivPiFinsupp_symm_apply,
Basis.repr_symm_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_mk, ne_eq, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
symm
-- Porting note: `Sigma.mk.inj` not found in the following, replaced by `Sigma.mk.inj_iff.mp`
exact
Finsupp.single_apply_left
(fun i i' (h : (⟨j, i⟩ : Σj, ιs j) = ⟨j, i'⟩) => eq_of_heq (Sigma.mk.inj_iff.mp h).2) _ _ _
simp only [Pi.basis, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppLEquivPiFinsupp_symm_apply,
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight]
dsimp
rw [stdBasis_ne _ _ _ _ (Ne.symm hj), LinearEquiv.map_zero, Finsupp.zero_apply,
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne]
rintro ⟨⟩
contradiction
#align pi.basis_repr_std_basis Pi.basis_repr_stdBasis
@[simp]
theorem basis_apply [DecidableEq η] (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) (ji) :
Pi.basis s ji = stdBasis R _ ji.1 (s ji.1 ji.2) :=
Basis.apply_eq_iff.mpr (by simp)
#align pi.basis_apply Pi.basis_apply
@[simp]
theorem basis_repr (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) (x) (ji) :
(Pi.basis s).repr x ji = (s ji.1).repr (x ji.1) ji.2 :=
rfl
#align pi.basis_repr Pi.basis_repr
end Fintype
section
variable [Finite η]
variable (R η)
/-- The basis on `η → R` where the `i`th basis vector is `Function.update 0 i 1`. -/
noncomputable def basisFun : Basis η R (η → R) :=
Basis.ofEquivFun (LinearEquiv.refl _ _)
#align pi.basis_fun Pi.basisFun
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/StdBasis.lean | 278 | 280 | theorem basisFun_apply [DecidableEq η] (i) : basisFun R η i = stdBasis R (fun _ : η => R) i 1 := by |
simp only [basisFun, Basis.coe_ofEquivFun, LinearEquiv.refl_symm, LinearEquiv.refl_apply,
stdBasis_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Felix Weilacher
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Perfect
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.Topology.CountableSeparatingOn
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.polish from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# The Borel sigma-algebra on Polish spaces
We discuss several results pertaining to the relationship between the topology and the Borel
structure on Polish spaces.
## Main definitions and results
First, we define standard Borel spaces.
* A `StandardBorelSpace α` is a typeclass for measurable spaces which arise as the Borel sets
of some Polish topology.
Next, we define the class of analytic sets and establish its basic properties.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet s`: a set in a topological space is analytic if it is the continuous
image of a Polish space. Equivalently, it is empty, or the image of `ℕ → ℕ`.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous`: a continuous image of an analytic set is
analytic.
* `MeasurableSet.analyticSet`: in a Polish space, any Borel-measurable set is analytic.
Then, we show Lusin's theorem that two disjoint analytic sets can be separated by Borel sets.
* `MeasurablySeparable s t` states that there exists a measurable set containing `s` and disjoint
from `t`.
* `AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable` shows that two disjoint analytic sets are separated by a
Borel set.
We then prove the Lusin-Souslin theorem that a continuous injective image of a Borel subset of
a Polish space is Borel. The proof of this nontrivial result relies on the above results on
analytic sets.
* `MeasurableSet.image_of_continuousOn_injOn` asserts that, if `s` is a Borel measurable set in
a Polish space, then the image of `s` under a continuous injective map is still Borel measurable.
* `Continuous.measurableEmbedding` states that a continuous injective map on a Polish space
is a measurable embedding for the Borel sigma-algebra.
* `ContinuousOn.measurableEmbedding` is the same result for a map restricted to a measurable set
on which it is continuous.
* `Measurable.measurableEmbedding` states that a measurable injective map from
a standard Borel space to a second-countable topological space is a measurable embedding.
* `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`: in a Polish space, a set is clopenable (i.e., it can be made
open and closed by using a finer Polish topology) if and only if it is Borel-measurable.
We use this to prove several versions of the Borel isomorphism theorem.
* `PolishSpace.measurableEquivOfNotCountable` : Any two uncountable standard Borel spaces
are Borel isomorphic.
* `PolishSpace.Equiv.measurableEquiv` : Any two standard Borel spaces of the same cardinality
are Borel isomorphic.
-/
open Set Function PolishSpace PiNat TopologicalSpace Bornology Metric Filter Topology MeasureTheory
/-! ### Standard Borel Spaces -/
variable (α : Type*)
/-- A standard Borel space is a measurable space arising as the Borel sets of some Polish topology.
This is useful in situations where a space has no natural topology or
the natural topology in a space is non-Polish.
To endow a standard Borel space `α` with a compatible Polish topology, use
`letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. One can then use `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α` to
rewrite the `MeasurableSpace α` instance to `borel α t`, where `t` is the new topology. -/
class StandardBorelSpace [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
/-- There exists a compatible Polish topology. -/
polish : ∃ _ : TopologicalSpace α, BorelSpace α ∧ PolishSpace α
/-- A convenience class similar to `UpgradedPolishSpace`. No instance should be registered.
Instead one should use `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
class UpgradedStandardBorel extends MeasurableSpace α, TopologicalSpace α,
BorelSpace α, PolishSpace α
/-- Use as `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α` to endow a standard Borel space `α` with
a compatible Polish topology.
Warning: following this with `borelize α` will cause an error. Instead, one can
rewrite with `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α`.
TODO: fix the corresponding bug in `borelize`. -/
noncomputable
def upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [h : StandardBorelSpace α] :
UpgradedStandardBorel α := by
choose τ hb hp using h.polish
constructor
/-- The `MeasurableSpace α` instance on a `StandardBorelSpace` `α` is equal to
the borel sets of `upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
theorem eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace α] :
‹MeasurableSpace α› = @borel _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace :=
@BorelSpace.measurable_eq _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace _
(upgradeStandardBorel α).toBorelSpace
variable {α}
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
instance standardBorel_of_polish [τ : TopologicalSpace α]
[BorelSpace α] [PolishSpace α] : StandardBorelSpace α := by exists τ
instance countablyGenerated_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
instance measurableSingleton_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] : MeasurableSingletonClass α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
namespace StandardBorelSpace
variable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
section instances
/-- A product of two standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance prod [StandardBorelSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace β] : StandardBorelSpace (α × β) :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
letI := upgradeStandardBorel β
inferInstance
/-- A product of countably many standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance pi_countable {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {α : ι → Type*} [∀ n, MeasurableSpace (α n)]
[∀ n, StandardBorelSpace (α n)] : StandardBorelSpace (∀ n, α n) :=
letI := fun n => upgradeStandardBorel (α n)
inferInstance
end instances
end StandardBorelSpace
end section
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-! ### Analytic sets -/
/-- An analytic set is a set which is the continuous image of some Polish space. There are several
equivalent characterizations of this definition. For the definition, we pick one that avoids
universe issues: a set is analytic if and only if it is a continuous image of `ℕ → ℕ` (or if it
is empty). The above more usual characterization is given
in `analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range`.
Warning: these are analytic sets in the context of descriptive set theory (which is why they are
registered in the namespace `MeasureTheory`). They have nothing to do with analytic sets in the
context of complex analysis. -/
irreducible_def AnalyticSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s = ∅ ∨ ∃ f : (ℕ → ℕ) → α, Continuous f ∧ range f = s
#align measure_theory.analytic_set MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Polish.lean | 169 | 171 | theorem analyticSet_empty : AnalyticSet (∅ : Set α) := by |
rw [AnalyticSet]
exact Or.inl rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Interval
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Pi
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
#align_import topology.order.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3efd324a3a31eaa40c9d5bfc669c4fafee5f9423"
/-!
# Theory of topology on ordered spaces
## Main definitions
The order topology on an ordered space is the topology generated by all open intervals (or
equivalently by those of the form `(-∞, a)` and `(b, +∞)`). We define it as `Preorder.topology α`.
However, we do *not* register it as an instance (as many existing ordered types already have
topologies, which would be equal but not definitionally equal to `Preorder.topology α`). Instead,
we introduce a class `OrderTopology α` (which is a `Prop`, also known as a mixin) saying that on
the type `α` having already a topological space structure and a preorder structure, the topological
structure is equal to the order topology.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts. For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `OrderTopology`, `Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
* `exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds`, `exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds` : if `x < y`, then any
neighborhood of `x` includes an interval `[x, z)` for some `z ∈ (x, y]`, and any neighborhood
of `y` includes an interval `(z, y]` for some `z ∈ [x, y)`.
* `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le` : theorem known as squeeze theorem,
sandwich theorem, theorem of Carabinieri, and two policemen (and a drunk) theorem; if `g` and `h`
both converge to `a`, and eventually `g x ≤ f x ≤ h x`, then `f` converges to `a`.
## Implementation notes
We do _not_ register the order topology as an instance on a preorder (or even on a linear order).
Indeed, on many such spaces, a topology has already been constructed in a different way (think
of the discrete spaces `ℕ` or `ℤ`, or `ℝ` that could inherit a topology as the completion of `ℚ`),
and is in general not defeq to the one generated by the intervals. We make it available as a
definition `Preorder.topology α` though, that can be registered as an instance when necessary, or
for specific types.
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: define `Preorder.topology` before `OrderTopology` and reuse the def
/-- The order topology on an ordered type is the topology generated by open intervals. We register
it on a preorder, but it is mostly interesting in linear orders, where it is also order-closed.
We define it as a mixin. If you want to introduce the order topology on a preorder, use
`Preorder.topology`. -/
class OrderTopology (α : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The topology is generated by open intervals `Set.Ioi _` and `Set.Iio _`. -/
topology_eq_generate_intervals : t = generateFrom { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a }
#align order_topology OrderTopology
/-- (Order) topology on a partial order `α` generated by the subbase of open intervals
`(a, ∞) = { x ∣ a < x }, (-∞ , b) = {x ∣ x < b}` for all `a, b` in `α`. We do not register it as an
instance as many ordered sets are already endowed with the same topology, most often in a non-defeq
way though. Register as a local instance when necessary. -/
def Preorder.topology (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : TopologicalSpace α :=
generateFrom { s : Set α | ∃ a : α, s = { b : α | a < b } ∨ s = { b : α | b < a } }
#align preorder.topology Preorder.topology
section OrderTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [t : OrderTopology α]
instance : OrderTopology αᵒᵈ :=
⟨by
convert OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals (α := α) using 6
apply or_comm⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_generate_intervals {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ GenerateOpen { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a } s := by
rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals]; rfl
#align is_open_iff_generate_intervals isOpen_iff_generate_intervals
theorem isOpen_lt' (a : α) : IsOpen { b : α | a < b } :=
isOpen_iff_generate_intervals.2 <| .basic _ ⟨a, .inl rfl⟩
#align is_open_lt' isOpen_lt'
theorem isOpen_gt' (a : α) : IsOpen { b : α | b < a } :=
isOpen_iff_generate_intervals.2 <| .basic _ ⟨a, .inr rfl⟩
#align is_open_gt' isOpen_gt'
theorem lt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a < x :=
(isOpen_lt' _).mem_nhds h
#align lt_mem_nhds lt_mem_nhds
theorem le_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a ≤ x :=
(lt_mem_nhds h).mono fun _ => le_of_lt
#align le_mem_nhds le_mem_nhds
theorem gt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x < b :=
(isOpen_gt' _).mem_nhds h
#align gt_mem_nhds gt_mem_nhds
theorem ge_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≤ b :=
(gt_mem_nhds h).mono fun _ => le_of_lt
#align ge_mem_nhds ge_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_eq_order (a : α) : 𝓝 a = (⨅ b ∈ Iio a, 𝓟 (Ioi b)) ⊓ ⨅ b ∈ Ioi a, 𝓟 (Iio b) := by
rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals, nhds_generateFrom]
simp_rw [mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (a ∈ _), exists_or, or_and_right, iInf_or, iInf_and, iInf_exists,
iInf_inf_eq, iInf_comm (ι := Set α), iInf_iInf_eq_left, mem_Ioi, mem_Iio]
#align nhds_eq_order nhds_eq_order
theorem tendsto_order {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : Filter β} :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ a' < a, ∀ᶠ b in x, a' < f b) ∧ ∀ a' > a, ∀ᶠ b in x, f b < a' := by
simp only [nhds_eq_order a, tendsto_inf, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]; rfl
#align tendsto_order tendsto_order
instance tendstoIccClassNhds (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Icc (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) := by
simp only [nhds_eq_order, iInf_subtype']
refine
((hasBasis_iInf_principal_finite _).inf (hasBasis_iInf_principal_finite _)).tendstoIxxClass
fun s _ => ?_
refine ((ordConnected_biInter ?_).inter (ordConnected_biInter ?_)).out <;> intro _ _
exacts [ordConnected_Ioi, ordConnected_Iio]
#align tendsto_Icc_class_nhds tendstoIccClassNhds
instance tendstoIcoClassNhds (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Ico (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendstoIxxClass_of_subset fun _ _ => Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align tendsto_Ico_class_nhds tendstoIcoClassNhds
instance tendstoIocClassNhds (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Ioc (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendstoIxxClass_of_subset fun _ _ => Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align tendsto_Ioc_class_nhds tendstoIocClassNhds
instance tendstoIooClassNhds (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Ioo (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendstoIxxClass_of_subset fun _ _ => Ioo_subset_Icc_self
#align tendsto_Ioo_class_nhds tendstoIooClassNhds
/-- **Squeeze theorem** (also known as **sandwich theorem**). This version assumes that inequalities
hold eventually for the filter. -/
theorem tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' {f g h : β → α} {b : Filter β} {a : α}
(hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : Tendsto h b (𝓝 a)) (hgf : ∀ᶠ b in b, g b ≤ f b)
(hfh : ∀ᶠ b in b, f b ≤ h b) : Tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
(hg.Icc hh).of_smallSets <| hgf.and hfh
#align tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'
/-- **Squeeze theorem** (also known as **sandwich theorem**). This version assumes that inequalities
hold everywhere. -/
theorem tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le {f g h : β → α} {b : Filter β} {a : α}
(hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : Tendsto h b (𝓝 a)) (hgf : g ≤ f) (hfh : f ≤ h) :
Tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' hg hh (eventually_of_forall hgf)
(eventually_of_forall hfh)
#align tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le
theorem nhds_order_unbounded {a : α} (hu : ∃ u, a < u) (hl : ∃ l, l < a) :
𝓝 a = ⨅ (l) (_ : l < a) (u) (_ : a < u), 𝓟 (Ioo l u) := by
simp only [nhds_eq_order, ← inf_biInf, ← biInf_inf, *, ← inf_principal, ← Ioi_inter_Iio]; rfl
#align nhds_order_unbounded nhds_order_unbounded
theorem tendsto_order_unbounded {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : Filter β} (hu : ∃ u, a < u)
(hl : ∃ l, l < a) (h : ∀ l u, l < a → a < u → ∀ᶠ b in x, l < f b ∧ f b < u) :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) := by
simp only [nhds_order_unbounded hu hl, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
exact fun l hl u => h l u hl
#align tendsto_order_unbounded tendsto_order_unbounded
end Preorder
instance tendstoIxxNhdsWithin {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] (a : α) {s t : Set α}
{Ixx} [TendstoIxxClass Ixx (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a)] [TendstoIxxClass Ixx (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t)] :
TendstoIxxClass Ixx (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] a) :=
Filter.tendstoIxxClass_inf
#align tendsto_Ixx_nhds_within tendstoIxxNhdsWithin
instance tendstoIccClassNhdsPi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] [∀ i, OrderTopology (α i)] (f : ∀ i, α i) :
TendstoIxxClass Icc (𝓝 f) (𝓝 f) := by
constructor
conv in (𝓝 f).smallSets => rw [nhds_pi, Filter.pi]
simp only [smallSets_iInf, smallSets_comap_eq_comap_image, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff]
intro i
have : Tendsto (fun g : ∀ i, α i => g i) (𝓝 f) (𝓝 (f i)) := (continuous_apply i).tendsto f
refine (this.comp tendsto_fst).Icc (this.comp tendsto_snd) |>.smallSets_mono ?_
filter_upwards [] using fun ⟨f, g⟩ ↦ image_subset_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ ⟨hp.1 i, hp.2 i⟩
#align tendsto_Icc_class_nhds_pi tendstoIccClassNhdsPi
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem induced_topology_le_preorder [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y) :
induced f ‹TopologicalSpace β› ≤ Preorder.topology α := by
let _ := Preorder.topology α; have : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
refine le_of_nhds_le_nhds fun x => ?_
simp only [nhds_eq_order, nhds_induced, comap_inf, comap_iInf, comap_principal, Ioi, Iio, ← hf]
refine inf_le_inf (le_iInf₂ fun a ha => ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun a ha => ?_)
exacts [iInf₂_le (f a) ha, iInf₂_le (f a) ha]
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem induced_topology_eq_preorder [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H₁ : ∀ {a b x}, b < f a → ¬(b < f x) → ∃ y, y < a ∧ b ≤ f y)
(H₂ : ∀ {a b x}, f a < b → ¬(f x < b) → ∃ y, a < y ∧ f y ≤ b) :
induced f ‹TopologicalSpace β› = Preorder.topology α := by
let _ := Preorder.topology α; have : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
refine le_antisymm (induced_topology_le_preorder hf) ?_
refine le_of_nhds_le_nhds fun a => ?_
simp only [nhds_eq_order, nhds_induced, comap_inf, comap_iInf, comap_principal]
refine inf_le_inf (le_iInf₂ fun b hb => ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun b hb => ?_)
· rcases em (∃ x, ¬(b < f x)) with (⟨x, hx⟩ | hb)
· rcases H₁ hb hx with ⟨y, hya, hyb⟩
exact iInf₂_le_of_le y hya (principal_mono.2 fun z hz => hyb.trans_lt (hf.2 hz))
· push_neg at hb
exact le_principal_iff.2 (univ_mem' hb)
· rcases em (∃ x, ¬(f x < b)) with (⟨x, hx⟩ | hb)
· rcases H₂ hb hx with ⟨y, hya, hyb⟩
exact iInf₂_le_of_le y hya (principal_mono.2 fun z hz => (hf.2 hz).trans_le hyb)
· push_neg at hb
exact le_principal_iff.2 (univ_mem' hb)
theorem induced_orderTopology' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Preorder α] [ta : TopologicalSpace β]
[Preorder β] [OrderTopology β] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H₁ : ∀ {a x}, x < f a → ∃ b < a, x ≤ f b) (H₂ : ∀ {a x}, f a < x → ∃ b > a, f b ≤ x) :
@OrderTopology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
let _ := induced f ta
⟨induced_topology_eq_preorder hf (fun h _ => H₁ h) (fun h _ => H₂ h)⟩
#align induced_order_topology' induced_orderTopology'
theorem induced_orderTopology {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Preorder α] [ta : TopologicalSpace β]
[Preorder β] [OrderTopology β] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H : ∀ {x y}, x < y → ∃ a, x < f a ∧ f a < y) : @OrderTopology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
induced_orderTopology' f (hf)
(fun xa => let ⟨b, xb, ba⟩ := H xa; ⟨b, hf.1 ba, le_of_lt xb⟩)
fun ax => let ⟨b, ab, bx⟩ := H ax; ⟨b, hf.1 ab, le_of_lt bx⟩
#align induced_order_topology induced_orderTopology
/-- The topology induced by a strictly monotone function with order-connected range is the preorder
topology. -/
nonrec theorem StrictMono.induced_topology_eq_preorder {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α]
[LinearOrder β] [t : TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StrictMono f) (hc : OrdConnected (range f)) : t.induced f = Preorder.topology α := by
refine induced_topology_eq_preorder hf.lt_iff_lt (fun h₁ h₂ => ?_) fun h₁ h₂ => ?_
· rcases hc.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨not_lt.1 h₂, h₁.le⟩ with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hf.lt_iff_lt.1 h₁, le_rfl⟩
· rcases hc.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨h₁.le, not_lt.1 h₂⟩ with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hf.lt_iff_lt.1 h₁, le_rfl⟩
/-- A strictly monotone function between linear orders with order topology is a topological
embedding provided that the range of `f` is order-connected. -/
theorem StrictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
[TopologicalSpace α] [h : OrderTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StrictMono f) (hc : OrdConnected (range f)) : Embedding f :=
⟨⟨h.1.trans <| Eq.symm <| hf.induced_topology_eq_preorder hc⟩, hf.injective⟩
/-- On a `Set.OrdConnected` subset of a linear order, the order topology for the restriction of the
order is the same as the restriction to the subset of the order topology. -/
instance orderTopology_of_ordConnected {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] {t : Set α} [ht : OrdConnected t] : OrderTopology t :=
⟨(Subtype.strictMono_coe t).induced_topology_eq_preorder <| by
rwa [← @Subtype.range_val _ t] at ht⟩
#align order_topology_of_ord_connected orderTopology_of_ordConnected
theorem nhdsWithin_Ici_eq'' [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] (a : α) :
𝓝[≥] a = (⨅ (u) (_ : a < u), 𝓟 (Iio u)) ⊓ 𝓟 (Ici a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_eq_order]
refine le_antisymm (inf_le_inf_right _ inf_le_right) (le_inf (le_inf ?_ inf_le_left) inf_le_right)
exact inf_le_right.trans (le_iInf₂ fun l hl => principal_mono.2 <| Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hl)
#align nhds_within_Ici_eq'' nhdsWithin_Ici_eq''
theorem nhdsWithin_Iic_eq'' [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] (a : α) :
𝓝[≤] a = (⨅ l < a, 𝓟 (Ioi l)) ⊓ 𝓟 (Iic a) :=
nhdsWithin_Ici_eq'' (toDual a)
#align nhds_within_Iic_eq'' nhdsWithin_Iic_eq''
theorem nhdsWithin_Ici_eq' [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ u, a < u) : 𝓝[≥] a = ⨅ (u) (_ : a < u), 𝓟 (Ico a u) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin_Ici_eq'', biInf_inf ha, inf_principal, Iio_inter_Ici]
#align nhds_within_Ici_eq' nhdsWithin_Ici_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_Iic_eq' [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ l, l < a) : 𝓝[≤] a = ⨅ l < a, 𝓟 (Ioc l a) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin_Iic_eq'', biInf_inf ha, inf_principal, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align nhds_within_Iic_eq' nhdsWithin_Iic_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_Ici_basis' [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ u, a < u) : (𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (fun u => a < u) fun u => Ico a u :=
(nhdsWithin_Ici_eq' ha).symm ▸
hasBasis_biInf_principal
(fun b hb c hc => ⟨min b c, lt_min hb hc, Ico_subset_Ico_right (min_le_left _ _),
Ico_subset_Ico_right (min_le_right _ _)⟩)
ha
#align nhds_within_Ici_basis' nhdsWithin_Ici_basis'
theorem nhdsWithin_Iic_basis' [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ l, l < a) : (𝓝[≤] a).HasBasis (fun l => l < a) fun l => Ioc l a := by
convert nhdsWithin_Ici_basis' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha using 2
exact dual_Ico.symm
#align nhds_within_Iic_basis' nhdsWithin_Iic_basis'
theorem nhdsWithin_Ici_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [NoMaxOrder α]
(a : α) : (𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (fun u => a < u) fun u => Ico a u :=
nhdsWithin_Ici_basis' (exists_gt a)
#align nhds_within_Ici_basis nhdsWithin_Ici_basis
theorem nhdsWithin_Iic_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [NoMinOrder α]
(a : α) : (𝓝[≤] a).HasBasis (fun l => l < a) fun l => Ioc l a :=
nhdsWithin_Iic_basis' (exists_lt a)
#align nhds_within_Iic_basis nhdsWithin_Iic_basis
theorem nhds_top_order [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] [OrderTopology α] :
𝓝 (⊤ : α) = ⨅ (l) (h₂ : l < ⊤), 𝓟 (Ioi l) := by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊤ : α)]
#align nhds_top_order nhds_top_order
theorem nhds_bot_order [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] [OrderTopology α] :
𝓝 (⊥ : α) = ⨅ (l) (h₂ : ⊥ < l), 𝓟 (Iio l) := by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊥ : α)]
#align nhds_bot_order nhds_bot_order
theorem nhds_top_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTop α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] : (𝓝 ⊤).HasBasis (fun a : α => a < ⊤) fun a : α => Ioi a := by
have : ∃ x : α, x < ⊤ := (exists_ne ⊤).imp fun x hx => hx.lt_top
simpa only [Iic_top, nhdsWithin_univ, Ioc_top] using nhdsWithin_Iic_basis' this
#align nhds_top_basis nhds_top_basis
theorem nhds_bot_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderBot α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] : (𝓝 ⊥).HasBasis (fun a : α => ⊥ < a) fun a : α => Iio a :=
nhds_top_basis (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align nhds_bot_basis nhds_bot_basis
theorem nhds_top_basis_Ici [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTop α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] [DenselyOrdered α] : (𝓝 ⊤).HasBasis (fun a : α => a < ⊤) Ici :=
nhds_top_basis.to_hasBasis
(fun _a ha => let ⟨b, hab, hb⟩ := exists_between ha; ⟨b, hb, Ici_subset_Ioi.mpr hab⟩)
fun a ha => ⟨a, ha, Ioi_subset_Ici_self⟩
#align nhds_top_basis_Ici nhds_top_basis_Ici
theorem nhds_bot_basis_Iic [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderBot α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] [DenselyOrdered α] : (𝓝 ⊥).HasBasis (fun a : α => ⊥ < a) Iic :=
nhds_top_basis_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align nhds_bot_basis_Iic nhds_bot_basis_Iic
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/Basic.lean | 353 | 357 | theorem tendsto_nhds_top_mono [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] [OrderTopology β]
{l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 ⊤)) (hg : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 ⊤) := by |
simp only [nhds_top_order, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal] at hf ⊢
intro x hx
filter_upwards [hf x hx, hg] with _ using lt_of_lt_of_le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
#align_import algebra.algebra.spectrum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"58a272265b5e05f258161260dd2c5d247213cbd3"
/-!
# Spectrum of an element in an algebra
This file develops the basic theory of the spectrum of an element of an algebra.
This theory will serve as the foundation for spectral theory in Banach algebras.
## Main definitions
* `resolventSet a : Set R`: the resolvent set of an element `a : A` where
`A` is an `R`-algebra.
* `spectrum a : Set R`: the spectrum of an element `a : A` where
`A` is an `R`-algebra.
* `resolvent : R → A`: the resolvent function is `fun r ↦ Ring.inverse (↑ₐr - a)`, and hence
when `r ∈ resolvent R A`, it is actually the inverse of the unit `(↑ₐr - a)`.
## Main statements
* `spectrum.unit_smul_eq_smul` and `spectrum.smul_eq_smul`: units in the scalar ring commute
(multiplication) with the spectrum, and over a field even `0` commutes with the spectrum.
* `spectrum.left_add_coset_eq`: elements of the scalar ring commute (addition) with the spectrum.
* `spectrum.unit_mem_mul_iff_mem_swap_mul` and `spectrum.preimage_units_mul_eq_swap_mul`: the
units (of `R`) in `σ (a*b)` coincide with those in `σ (b*a)`.
* `spectrum.scalar_eq`: in a nontrivial algebra over a field, the spectrum of a scalar is
a singleton.
## Notations
* `σ a` : `spectrum R a` of `a : A`
-/
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v
section Defs
variable (R : Type u) {A : Type v}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap R A
-- definition and basic properties
/-- Given a commutative ring `R` and an `R`-algebra `A`, the *resolvent set* of `a : A`
is the `Set R` consisting of those `r : R` for which `r•1 - a` is a unit of the
algebra `A`. -/
def resolventSet (a : A) : Set R :=
{r : R | IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a)}
#align resolvent_set resolventSet
/-- Given a commutative ring `R` and an `R`-algebra `A`, the *spectrum* of `a : A`
is the `Set R` consisting of those `r : R` for which `r•1 - a` is not a unit of the
algebra `A`.
The spectrum is simply the complement of the resolvent set. -/
def spectrum (a : A) : Set R :=
(resolventSet R a)ᶜ
#align spectrum spectrum
variable {R}
/-- Given an `a : A` where `A` is an `R`-algebra, the *resolvent* is
a map `R → A` which sends `r : R` to `(algebraMap R A r - a)⁻¹` when
`r ∈ resolvent R A` and `0` when `r ∈ spectrum R A`. -/
noncomputable def resolvent (a : A) (r : R) : A :=
Ring.inverse (↑ₐ r - a)
#align resolvent resolvent
/-- The unit `1 - r⁻¹ • a` constructed from `r • 1 - a` when the latter is a unit. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def IsUnit.subInvSMul {r : Rˣ} {s : R} {a : A} (h : IsUnit <| r • ↑ₐ s - a) : Aˣ where
val := ↑ₐ s - r⁻¹ • a
inv := r • ↑h.unit⁻¹
val_inv := by rw [mul_smul_comm, ← smul_mul_assoc, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul, h.mul_val_inv]
inv_val := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, ← mul_smul_comm, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul, h.val_inv_mul]
#align is_unit.sub_inv_smul IsUnit.subInvSMul
#align is_unit.coe_sub_inv_smul IsUnit.val_subInvSMul
#align is_unit.coe_inv_sub_inv_smul IsUnit.val_inv_subInvSMul
end Defs
namespace spectrum
section ScalarSemiring
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
local notation "σ" => spectrum R
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap R A
theorem mem_iff {r : R} {a : A} : r ∈ σ a ↔ ¬IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align spectrum.mem_iff spectrum.mem_iff
theorem not_mem_iff {r : R} {a : A} : r ∉ σ a ↔ IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a) := by
apply not_iff_not.mp
simp [Set.not_not_mem, mem_iff]
#align spectrum.not_mem_iff spectrum.not_mem_iff
variable (R)
theorem zero_mem_iff {a : A} : (0 : R) ∈ σ a ↔ ¬IsUnit a := by
rw [mem_iff, map_zero, zero_sub, IsUnit.neg_iff]
#align spectrum.zero_mem_iff spectrum.zero_mem_iff
alias ⟨not_isUnit_of_zero_mem, zero_mem⟩ := spectrum.zero_mem_iff
theorem zero_not_mem_iff {a : A} : (0 : R) ∉ σ a ↔ IsUnit a := by
rw [zero_mem_iff, Classical.not_not]
#align spectrum.zero_not_mem_iff spectrum.zero_not_mem_iff
alias ⟨isUnit_of_zero_not_mem, zero_not_mem⟩ := spectrum.zero_not_mem_iff
lemma subset_singleton_zero_compl {a : A} (ha : IsUnit a) : spectrum R a ⊆ {0}ᶜ :=
Set.subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr <| spectrum.zero_not_mem R ha
variable {R}
theorem mem_resolventSet_of_left_right_inverse {r : R} {a b c : A} (h₁ : (↑ₐ r - a) * b = 1)
(h₂ : c * (↑ₐ r - a) = 1) : r ∈ resolventSet R a :=
Units.isUnit ⟨↑ₐ r - a, b, h₁, by rwa [← left_inv_eq_right_inv h₂ h₁]⟩
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_of_left_right_inverse spectrum.mem_resolventSet_of_left_right_inverse
theorem mem_resolventSet_iff {r : R} {a : A} : r ∈ resolventSet R a ↔ IsUnit (↑ₐ r - a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_iff spectrum.mem_resolventSet_iff
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_mem_iff (S : Type*) {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Ring A] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] {a : A} {r : R} :
algebraMap R S r ∈ spectrum S a ↔ r ∈ spectrum R a := by
simp only [spectrum.mem_iff, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
protected alias ⟨of_algebraMap_mem, algebraMap_mem⟩ := spectrum.algebraMap_mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_algebraMap (S : Type*) {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Ring A] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] {a : A} :
algebraMap R S ⁻¹' spectrum S a = spectrum R a :=
Set.ext fun _ => spectrum.algebraMap_mem_iff _
@[simp]
theorem resolventSet_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton A] (a : A) : resolventSet R a = Set.univ := by
simp_rw [resolventSet, Subsingleton.elim (algebraMap R A _ - a) 1, isUnit_one, Set.setOf_true]
#align spectrum.resolvent_set_of_subsingleton spectrum.resolventSet_of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton A] (a : A) : spectrum R a = ∅ := by
rw [spectrum, resolventSet_of_subsingleton, Set.compl_univ]
#align spectrum.of_subsingleton spectrum.of_subsingleton
theorem resolvent_eq {a : A} {r : R} (h : r ∈ resolventSet R a) : resolvent a r = ↑h.unit⁻¹ :=
Ring.inverse_unit h.unit
#align spectrum.resolvent_eq spectrum.resolvent_eq
theorem units_smul_resolvent {r : Rˣ} {s : R} {a : A} :
r • resolvent a (s : R) = resolvent (r⁻¹ • a) (r⁻¹ • s : R) := by
by_cases h : s ∈ spectrum R a
· rw [mem_iff] at h
simp only [resolvent, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] at *
rw [smul_assoc, ← smul_sub]
have h' : ¬IsUnit (r⁻¹ • (s • (1 : A) - a)) := fun hu =>
h (by simpa only [smul_inv_smul] using IsUnit.smul r hu)
simp only [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h', smul_zero]
· simp only [resolvent]
have h' : IsUnit (r • algebraMap R A (r⁻¹ • s) - a) := by
simpa [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc] using not_mem_iff.mp h
rw [← h'.val_subInvSMul, ← (not_mem_iff.mp h).unit_spec, Ring.inverse_unit, Ring.inverse_unit,
h'.val_inv_subInvSMul]
simp only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, smul_inv_smul]
#align spectrum.units_smul_resolvent spectrum.units_smul_resolvent
theorem units_smul_resolvent_self {r : Rˣ} {a : A} :
r • resolvent a (r : R) = resolvent (r⁻¹ • a) (1 : R) := by
simpa only [Units.smul_def, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Units.inv_mul] using
@units_smul_resolvent _ _ _ _ _ r r a
#align spectrum.units_smul_resolvent_self spectrum.units_smul_resolvent_self
/-- The resolvent is a unit when the argument is in the resolvent set. -/
theorem isUnit_resolvent {r : R} {a : A} : r ∈ resolventSet R a ↔ IsUnit (resolvent a r) :=
isUnit_ring_inverse.symm
#align spectrum.is_unit_resolvent spectrum.isUnit_resolvent
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Spectrum.lean | 198 | 207 | theorem inv_mem_resolventSet {r : Rˣ} {a : Aˣ} (h : (r : R) ∈ resolventSet R (a : A)) :
(↑r⁻¹ : R) ∈ resolventSet R (↑a⁻¹ : A) := by |
rw [mem_resolventSet_iff, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← Units.smul_def] at h ⊢
rw [IsUnit.smul_sub_iff_sub_inv_smul, inv_inv, IsUnit.sub_iff]
have h₁ : (a : A) * (r • (↑a⁻¹ : A) - 1) = r • (1 : A) - a := by
rw [mul_sub, mul_smul_comm, a.mul_inv, mul_one]
have h₂ : (r • (↑a⁻¹ : A) - 1) * a = r • (1 : A) - a := by
rw [sub_mul, smul_mul_assoc, a.inv_mul, one_mul]
have hcomm : Commute (a : A) (r • (↑a⁻¹ : A) - 1) := by rwa [← h₂] at h₁
exact (hcomm.isUnit_mul_iff.mp (h₁.symm ▸ h)).2
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### mem -/
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
/-! ### List subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
/-! ### tail -/
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
/-! ### next? -/
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
/-! ### get? -/
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
/-! ### drop -/
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
/-! ### modifyNth -/
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
/-! ### set -/
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
/-! ### removeNth -/
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
/-! ### tail -/
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
/-! ### eraseP -/
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [BEq α]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP' (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a = l.eraseP (· == a) := by
induction l
· simp
· next b t ih =>
rw [erase_cons, eraseP_cons, ih]
if h : b == a then simp [h] else simp [h]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) : ∀ l : List α, l.erase a = l.eraseP (a == ·)
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by
if h : a = b then simp [h] else simp [h, Ne.symm h, erase_eq_eraseP a l]
theorem exists_erase_eq [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, e, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_eraseP h (beq_self_eq_true _)
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, fun h => h₁ _ h (beq_self_eq_true _), eq_of_beq e ▸ h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact length_eraseP_of_mem h (beq_self_eq_true a)
theorem erase_append_left [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ : List α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ := by
simp [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact eraseP_append_left (beq_self_eq_true a) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l₁ : List α} (l₂ : List α) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = (l₁ ++ l₂.erase a) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_append_right]
intros b h' h''; rw [eq_of_beq h''] at h; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP' a l ▸ eraseP_sublist l
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a ⊆ l := (erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem Sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq_eraseP']; exact h.eraseP
@[deprecated] alias sublist.erase := Sublist.erase
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.erase b) : a ∈ l := erase_subset _ _ h
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} {l : List α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP b l ▸ mem_eraseP_of_neg (mt eq_of_beq ab.symm)
theorem erase_comm [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) :
(l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a := by
if ab : a == b then rw [eq_of_beq ab] else ?_
if ha : a ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
if hb : b ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha with
| _, _, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩ =>
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end erase
/-! ### filter and partition -/
@[simp] theorem filter_sublist {p : α → Bool} : ∀ (l : List α), filter p l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => by rw [filter]; split <;> simp [Sublist.cons, Sublist.cons₂, filter_sublist l]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem length_filter_le (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
(l.filter p).length ≤ l.length := (filter_sublist _).length_le
theorem length_filterMap_le (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
(filterMap f l).length ≤ l.length := by
rw [← length_map _ some, map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some, ← length_map _ f]
apply length_filter_le
protected theorem Sublist.filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) :
filterMap f l₁ <+ filterMap f l₂ := by
induction s <;> simp <;> split <;> simp [*, cons, cons₂]
theorem Sublist.filter (p : α → Bool) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter]; apply s.filterMap
@[simp]
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
induction l with simp
| cons a l ih =>
cases h : p a <;> simp [*]
intro h; exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (h ▸ length_filter_le p l)
@[simp]
theorem filter_length_eq_length {l} : (filter p l).length = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
Iff.trans ⟨l.filter_sublist.eq_of_length, congrArg length⟩ filter_eq_self
/-! ### findIdx -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx_nil {α : Type _} (p : α → Bool) : [].findIdx p = 0 := rfl
theorem findIdx_cons (p : α → Bool) (b : α) (l : List α) :
(b :: l).findIdx p = bif p b then 0 else (l.findIdx p) + 1 := by
cases H : p b with
| true => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go]
| false => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go, findIdx_go_succ]
where
findIdx_go_succ (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
List.findIdx.go p l (n + 1) = (findIdx.go p l n) + 1 := by
cases l with
| nil => unfold findIdx.go; exact Nat.succ_eq_add_one n
| cons head tail =>
unfold findIdx.go
cases p head <;> simp only [cond_false, cond_true]
exact findIdx_go_succ p tail (n + 1)
theorem findIdx_of_get?_eq_some {xs : List α} (w : xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some y) : p y := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih => by_cases h : p x <;> simp_all [findIdx_cons]
theorem findIdx_get {xs : List α} {w : xs.findIdx p < xs.length} :
p (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, w⟩) :=
xs.findIdx_of_get?_eq_some (get?_eq_get w)
theorem findIdx_lt_length_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.findIdx p < xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
by_cases p x
· simp_all only [forall_exists_index, and_imp, mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp, true_or,
findIdx_cons, cond_true, length_cons]
apply Nat.succ_pos
· simp_all [findIdx_cons]
refine Nat.succ_lt_succ ?_
obtain ⟨x', m', h'⟩ := h
exact ih x' m' h'
theorem findIdx_get?_eq_get_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, xs.findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h⟩) :=
get?_eq_get (findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h)
/-! ### findIdx? -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_cons :
(x :: xs).findIdx? p i = if p x then some i else findIdx? p xs (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_succ :
(xs : List α).findIdx? p (i+1) = (xs.findIdx? p i).map fun i => i + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing i with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_eq_some_iff (xs : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
xs.findIdx? p = some i ↔ (xs.take (i + 1)).map p = replicate i false ++ [true] := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, take_succ_cons, map_cons]
split <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_some {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = some i) :
match xs.get? i with | some a => p a | none => false := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
split at w <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_none {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = none) :
∀ i, match xs.get? i with | some a => ¬ p a | none => true := by
intro i
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [Bool.not_eq_true, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
cases i with
| zero =>
split at w <;> simp_all
| succ i =>
simp only [get?_cons_succ]
apply ih
split at w <;> simp_all
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_append :
(xs ++ ys : List α).findIdx? p =
(xs.findIdx? p <|> (ys.findIdx? p).map fun i => i + xs.length) := by
induction xs with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all [Option.map_orElse, Option.map_map]; rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_replicate :
(replicate n a).findIdx? p = if 0 < n ∧ p a then some 0 else none := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, Nat.zero_lt_succ, true_and]
split <;> simp_all
/-! ### pairwise -/
theorem Pairwise.sublist : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₂.Pairwise R → l₁.Pairwise R
| .slnil, h => h
| .cons _ s, .cons _ h₂ => h₂.sublist s
| .cons₂ _ s, .cons h₁ h₂ => (h₂.sublist s).cons fun _ h => h₁ _ (s.subset h)
theorem pairwise_map {l : List α} :
(l.map f).Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise fun a b => R (f a) (f b) := by
induction l
· simp
· simp only [map, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_map_iff, *]
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
(l₁ ++ l₂).Pairwise R ↔ l₁.Pairwise R ∧ l₂.Pairwise R ∧ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, R a b := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_imp, forall_and, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
theorem pairwise_reverse {l : List α} :
l.reverse.Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise (fun a b => R b a) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, pairwise_append, and_comm]
theorem Pairwise.imp {α R S} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) :
∀ {l : List α}, l.Pairwise R → l.Pairwise S
| _, .nil => .nil
| _, .cons h₁ h₂ => .cons (H ∘ h₁ ·) (h₂.imp H)
/-! ### replaceF -/
theorem replaceF_nil : [].replaceF p = [] := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = match p a with
| none => a :: replaceF p l
| some a' => a' :: l := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons_of_some {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = some a') :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a' :: l := by
simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_cons_of_none {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = none) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a :: l.replaceF p := by simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_of_forall_none {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → p a = none) : l.replaceF p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_replaceF : ∀ {l : List α} {a a'} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a = some a'),
∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂
| b :: l, a, a', al, pa =>
match pb : p b with
| some b' => ⟨b, b', [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
| none =>
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb.symm.trans pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, c', l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_replaceF al pa
⟨c, c', b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_replaceF (p) (l : List α) :
l.replaceF p = l ∨ ∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, (p a).isSome then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_replaceF ha (Option.get_mem pa))
else
.inl <| replaceF_of_forall_none fun a ha =>
Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.1 fun h' => h ⟨a, ha, h'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_replaceF : length (replaceF f l) = length l := by
induction l <;> simp [replaceF]; split <;> simp [*]
/-! ### disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₂ l₁ := ⟨disjoint_symm, disjoint_symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := by simp [Disjoint]
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ := disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h _ al1 _ bl2 ab => h al1 (ab ▸ bl2), fun h _ al1 al2 => h _ al1 _ al2 rfl⟩
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l l₂) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m => d (ss m)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l₁ l) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m m₁ => d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint (a :: l₁) l₂ → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : List α) : Disjoint [] l := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : List α) : Disjoint l [] := by
rw [disjoint_comm]; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint : Disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l := by simp [Disjoint]
@[simp 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l := by
rw [disjoint_comm, singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l ↔ Disjoint l₁ l ∧ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp [Disjoint, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Disjoint l l₁ ∧ Disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_append_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left : Disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ (a ∉ l₂) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_left (l₁ := [a])).trans <| by simp [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) ↔ (a ∉ l₁) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_cons_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
/-! ### foldl / foldr -/
theorem foldl_hom (f : α₁ → α₂) (g₁ : α₁ → β → α₁) (g₂ : α₂ → β → α₂) (l : List β) (init : α₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ (f x) y = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldl g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldl g₁ init) := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, H]
theorem foldr_hom (f : β₁ → β₂) (g₁ : α → β₁ → β₁) (g₂ : α → β₂ → β₂) (l : List α) (init : β₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ x (f y) = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldr g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldr g₁ init) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, H]
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [BEq α]
theorem union_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ = foldr .insert l₂ l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : List α) : nil ∪ l = l := by simp [List.union_def, foldr]
@[simp] theorem cons_union (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
(a :: l₁) ∪ l₂ = (l₁ ∪ l₂).insert a := by simp [List.union_def, foldr]
@[simp] theorem mem_union_iff [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∨ x ∈ l₂ := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_assoc]
end union
/-! ### inter -/
theorem inter_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ = filter (elem · l₂) l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_iff [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∧ x ∈ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> simp [List.inter_def, mem_filter]
/-! ### product -/
/-- List.prod satisfies a specification of cartesian product on lists. -/
@[simp]
theorem pair_mem_product {xs : List α} {ys : List β} {x : α} {y : β} :
(x, y) ∈ product xs ys ↔ x ∈ xs ∧ y ∈ ys := by
simp only [product, and_imp, mem_map, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right_right, mem_bind, iff_self]
/-! ### leftpad -/
/-- The length of the List returned by `List.leftpad n a l` is equal
to the larger of `n` and `l.length` -/
@[simp]
theorem leftpad_length (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(leftpad n a l).length = max n l.length := by
simp only [leftpad, length_append, length_replicate, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
theorem leftpad_prefix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
replicate (n - length l) a <+: leftpad n a l := by
simp only [IsPrefix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro l rfl
theorem leftpad_suffix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) : l <:+ (leftpad n a l) := by
simp only [IsSuffix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro (replicate (n - length l) a) rfl
/-! ### monadic operations -/
-- we use ForIn.forIn as the simp normal form
@[simp] theorem forIn_eq_forIn [Monad m] : @List.forIn α β m _ = forIn := rfl
theorem forIn_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
(f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) (l : List α) (init : β) :
forIn l init f = ForInStep.run <$> (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f l := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, map_eq_pure_bind]
congr; ext (b | b) <;> simp
@[simp] theorem forM_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (l₁ l₂ : List α) (f : α → m PUnit) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).forM f = (do l₁.forM f; l₂.forM f) := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [BEq α]
variable [LawfulBEq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : List α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := by
simp_all [List.diff, erase_of_not_mem]
theorem diff_cons_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.diff l₂).erase a := by
apply Eq.symm; induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> simp [erase_comm, *]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 963 | 964 | theorem diff_erase (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : (l₁.diff l₂).erase a = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := by |
rw [← diff_cons_right, diff_cons]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Vincent Beffara. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Vincent Beffara
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Dslope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Uniqueness
#align_import analysis.analytic.isolated_zeros from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3209ddf94136d36e5e5c624b10b2a347cc9d090"
/-!
# Principle of isolated zeros
This file proves the fact that the zeros of a non-constant analytic function of one variable are
isolated. It also introduces a little bit of API in the `HasFPowerSeriesAt` namespace that is
useful in this setup.
## Main results
* `AnalyticAt.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero` is the main statement that if a function is
analytic at `z₀`, then either it is identically zero in a neighborhood of `z₀`, or it does not
vanish in a punctured neighborhood of `z₀`.
* `AnalyticOn.eqOn_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq` is the identity theorem for analytic
functions: if a function `f` is analytic on a connected set `U` and is zero on a set with an
accumulation point in `U` then `f` is identically `0` on `U`.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Filter Function Nat FormalMultilinearSeries EMetric Set
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {s : E} {p q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 𝕜 E} {f g : 𝕜 → E} {n : ℕ} {z z₀ : 𝕜}
namespace HasSum
variable {a : ℕ → E}
theorem hasSum_at_zero (a : ℕ → E) : HasSum (fun n => (0 : 𝕜) ^ n • a n) (a 0) := by
convert hasSum_single (α := E) 0 fun b h ↦ _ <;> simp [*]
#align has_sum.has_sum_at_zero HasSum.hasSum_at_zero
theorem exists_hasSum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero (hs : HasSum (fun m => z ^ m • a m) s)
(ha : ∀ k < n, a k = 0) : ∃ t : E, z ^ n • t = s ∧ HasSum (fun m => z ^ m • a (m + n)) t := by
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· simpa
by_cases h : z = 0
· have : s = 0 := hs.unique (by simpa [ha 0 hn, h] using hasSum_at_zero a)
exact ⟨a n, by simp [h, hn.ne', this], by simpa [h] using hasSum_at_zero fun m => a (m + n)⟩
· refine ⟨(z ^ n)⁻¹ • s, by field_simp [smul_smul], ?_⟩
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, z ^ i • a i = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun k hk => by simp [ha k (Finset.mem_range.mp hk)]
have h2 : HasSum (fun m => z ^ (m + n) • a (m + n)) s := by
simpa [h1] using (hasSum_nat_add_iff' n).mpr hs
convert h2.const_smul (z⁻¹ ^ n) using 1
· field_simp [pow_add, smul_smul]
· simp only [inv_pow]
#align has_sum.exists_has_sum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero HasSum.exists_hasSum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero
end HasSum
namespace HasFPowerSeriesAt
theorem has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (dslope f z₀) p.fslope z₀ := by
have hpd : deriv f z₀ = p.coeff 1 := hp.deriv
have hp0 : p.coeff 0 = f z₀ := hp.coeff_zero 1
simp only [hasFPowerSeriesAt_iff, apply_eq_pow_smul_coeff, coeff_fslope] at hp ⊢
refine hp.mono fun x hx => ?_
by_cases h : x = 0
· convert hasSum_single (α := E) 0 _ <;> intros <;> simp [*]
· have hxx : ∀ n : ℕ, x⁻¹ * x ^ (n + 1) = x ^ n := fun n => by field_simp [h, _root_.pow_succ]
suffices HasSum (fun n => x⁻¹ • x ^ (n + 1) • p.coeff (n + 1)) (x⁻¹ • (f (z₀ + x) - f z₀)) by
simpa [dslope, slope, h, smul_smul, hxx] using this
simpa [hp0] using ((hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr hx).const_smul x⁻¹
#align has_fpower_series_at.has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope HasFPowerSeriesAt.has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope
theorem has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope (n : ℕ) (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt ((swap dslope z₀)^[n] f) (fslope^[n] p) z₀ := by
induction' n with n ih generalizing f p
· exact hp
· simpa using ih (has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope hp)
#align has_fpower_series_at.has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope HasFPowerSeriesAt.has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope
theorem iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) (h : p ≠ 0) :
(swap dslope z₀)^[p.order] f z₀ ≠ 0 := by
rw [← coeff_zero (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp) 1]
simpa [coeff_eq_zero] using apply_order_ne_zero h
#align has_fpower_series_at.iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero HasFPowerSeriesAt.iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero
theorem eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = (z - z₀) ^ p.order • (swap dslope z₀)^[p.order] f z := by
have hq := hasFPowerSeriesAt_iff'.mp (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp)
filter_upwards [hq, hasFPowerSeriesAt_iff'.mp hp] with x hx1 hx2
have : ∀ k < p.order, p.coeff k = 0 := fun k hk => by
simpa [coeff_eq_zero] using apply_eq_zero_of_lt_order hk
obtain ⟨s, hs1, hs2⟩ := HasSum.exists_hasSum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero hx2 this
convert hs1.symm
simp only [coeff_iterate_fslope] at hx1
exact hx1.unique hs2
#align has_fpower_series_at.eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope HasFPowerSeriesAt.eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope
theorem locally_ne_zero (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) (h : p ≠ 0) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z ≠ 0 := by
rw [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff]
have h2 := (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp).continuousAt
have h3 := h2.eventually_ne (iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero hp h)
filter_upwards [eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope hp, h3] with z e1 e2 e3
simpa [e1, e2, e3] using pow_ne_zero p.order (sub_ne_zero.mpr e3)
#align has_fpower_series_at.locally_ne_zero HasFPowerSeriesAt.locally_ne_zero
theorem locally_zero_iff (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) : (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = 0) ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun hf => hp.eq_zero_of_eventually hf, fun h => eventually_eq_zero (by rwa [h] at hp)⟩
#align has_fpower_series_at.locally_zero_iff HasFPowerSeriesAt.locally_zero_iff
end HasFPowerSeriesAt
namespace AnalyticAt
/-- The *principle of isolated zeros* for an analytic function, local version: if a function is
analytic at `z₀`, then either it is identically zero in a neighborhood of `z₀`, or it does not
vanish in a punctured neighborhood of `z₀`. -/
theorem eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f z₀) :
(∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = 0) ∨ ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z ≠ 0 := by
rcases hf with ⟨p, hp⟩
by_cases h : p = 0
· exact Or.inl (HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_eq_zero (by rwa [h] at hp))
· exact Or.inr (hp.locally_ne_zero h)
#align analytic_at.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero AnalyticAt.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero
theorem eventually_eq_or_eventually_ne (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f z₀) (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g z₀) :
(∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = g z) ∨ ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z ≠ g z := by
simpa [sub_eq_zero] using (hf.sub hg).eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero
#align analytic_at.eventually_eq_or_eventually_ne AnalyticAt.eventually_eq_or_eventually_ne
theorem frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero {f : 𝕜 → E} {w : 𝕜} (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f w) :
(∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] w, f z = 0) ↔ ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 w, f z = 0 :=
⟨hf.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero.resolve_right, fun h =>
(h.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds).frequently⟩
#align analytic_at.frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero AnalyticAt.frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/IsolatedZeros.lean | 146 | 148 | theorem frequently_eq_iff_eventually_eq (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f z₀) (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g z₀) :
(∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z = g z) ↔ ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = g z := by |
simpa [sub_eq_zero] using frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero (hf.sub hg)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
#align_import model_theory.semantics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d565b3df44619c1498326936be16f1a935df0728"
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Semantics
This file defines the interpretations of first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories
in a style inspired by the [Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
* `FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize` is defined so that `t.realize v` is the term `t` evaluated at
variables `v`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v xs` is the bounded
formula `φ` evaluated at tuples of variables `v` and `xs`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v` is the formula `φ`
evaluated at variables `v`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize M` is the sentence `φ`
evaluated in the structure `M`. Also denoted `M ⊨ φ`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model` is defined so that `T.Model M` is true if and only if every
sentence of `T` is realized in `M`. Also denoted `T ⊨ φ`.
## Main Results
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenex` shows that the prenex normal form of a
formula has the same realization as the original formula.
* Several results in this file show that syntactic constructions such as `relabel`, `castLE`,
`liftAt`, `subst`, and the actions of language maps commute with realization of terms, formulas,
sentences, and theories.
## Implementation Notes
* Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal Fin
namespace Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- A term `t` with variables indexed by `α` can be evaluated by giving a value to each variable. -/
def realize (v : α → M) : ∀ _t : L.Term α, M
| var k => v k
| func f ts => funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v
#align first_order.language.term.realize FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize
/- Porting note: The equation lemma of `realize` is too strong; it simplifies terms like the LHS of
`realize_functions_apply₁`. Even `eqns` can't fix this. We removed `simp` attr from `realize` and
prepare new simp lemmas for `realize`. -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_var (v : α → M) (k) : realize v (var k : L.Term α) = v k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_func (v : α → M) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (ts) :
realize v (func f ts : L.Term α) = funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {t : L.Term α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(t.relabel g).realize v = t.realize (v ∘ g) := by
induction' t with _ n f ts ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_relabel
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))} {v : Sum α (Fin (n + n')) → M} :
(t.liftAt n' m).realize v =
t.realize (v ∘ Sum.map id fun i : Fin _ =>
if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') :=
realize_relabel
#align first_order.language.term.realize_lift_at FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_liftAt
@[simp]
theorem realize_constants {c : L.Constants} {v : α → M} : c.term.realize v = c :=
funMap_eq_coe_constants
#align first_order.language.term.realize_constants FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_constants
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₁ {f : L.Functions 1} {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₁ t).realize v = funMap f ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₁, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_functions_apply₁ FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_functions_apply₁
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₂ {f : L.Functions 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₂ t₁ t₂).realize v = funMap f ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₂, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_functions_apply₂ FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_functions_apply₂
theorem realize_con {A : Set M} {a : A} {v : α → M} : (L.con a).term.realize v = a :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.term.realize_con FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_con
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {t : L.Term α} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} :
(t.subst tf).realize v = t.realize fun a => (tf a).realize v := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_subst FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_subst
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVar [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {s : Set α} (h : ↑t.varFinset ⊆ s)
{v : α → M} : (t.restrictVar (Set.inclusion h)).realize (v ∘ (↑)) = t.realize v := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp_rw [varFinset, Finset.coe_biUnion, Set.iUnion_subset_iff] at h
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (h i (Finset.mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.realize_restrict_var FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_restrictVar
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (Sum α γ)} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑t.varFinsetLeft ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : γ → M} :
(t.restrictVarLeft (Set.inclusion h)).realize (Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
induction' t with a _ _ _ ih
· cases a <;> rfl
· simp_rw [varFinsetLeft, Finset.coe_biUnion, Set.iUnion_subset_iff] at h
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (h i (Finset.mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.realize_restrict_var_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_restrictVarLeft
@[simp]
theorem realize_constantsToVars [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L[[α]].Term β} {v : β → M} :
t.constantsToVars.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) = t.realize v := by
induction' t with _ n f ts ih
· simp
· cases n
· cases f
· simp only [realize, ih, Nat.zero_eq, constantsOn, mk₂_Functions]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sum_inl]
· simp only [realize, constantsToVars, Sum.elim_inl, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
rfl
· cases' f with _ f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, mk₂_Functions]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sum_inl]
· exact isEmptyElim f
#align first_order.language.term.realize_constants_to_vars FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_constantsToVars
@[simp]
theorem realize_varsToConstants [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L.Term (Sum α β)} {v : β → M} :
t.varsToConstants.realize v = t.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) := by
induction' t with ab n f ts ih
· cases' ab with a b
-- Porting note: both cases were `simp [Language.con]`
· simp [Language.con, realize, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
· simp [realize, constantMap]
· simp only [realize, constantsOn, mk₂_Functions, ih]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sum_inl]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_vars_to_constants FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_varsToConstants
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M] {n} {t : L[[α]].Term (Sum β (Fin n))} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquivLeft t).realize (Sum.elim (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
simp only [constantsVarsEquivLeft, realize_relabel, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
constantsVarsEquiv_apply, relabelEquiv_symm_apply]
refine _root_.trans ?_ realize_constantsToVars
rcongr x
rcases x with (a | (b | i)) <;> simp
#align first_order.language.term.realize_constants_vars_equiv_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft
end Term
namespace LHom
@[simp]
theorem realize_onTerm [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (t : L.Term α)
(v : α → M) : (φ.onTerm t).realize v = t.realize v := by
induction' t with _ n f ts ih
· rfl
· simp only [Term.realize, LHom.onTerm, LHom.map_onFunction, ih]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onTerm
end LHom
@[simp]
theorem Hom.realize_term (g : M →[L] N) {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) := by
induction t
· rfl
· rw [Term.realize, Term.realize, g.map_fun]
refine congr rfl ?_
ext x
simp [*]
#align first_order.language.hom.realize_term FirstOrder.Language.Hom.realize_term
@[simp]
theorem Embedding.realize_term {v : α → M} (t : L.Term α) (g : M ↪[L] N) :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) :=
g.toHom.realize_term
#align first_order.language.embedding.realize_term FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.realize_term
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.realize_term {v : α → M} (t : L.Term α) (g : M ≃[L] N) :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) :=
g.toHom.realize_term
#align first_order.language.equiv.realize_term FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.realize_term
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace BoundedFormula
open Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- A bounded formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
def Realize : ∀ {l} (_f : L.BoundedFormula α l) (_v : α → M) (_xs : Fin l → M), Prop
| _, falsum, _v, _xs => False
| _, equal t₁ t₂, v, xs => t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, rel R ts, v, xs => RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, imp f₁ f₂, v, xs => Realize f₁ v xs → Realize f₂ v xs
| _, all f, v, xs => ∀ x : M, Realize f v (snoc xs x)
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize
variable {l : ℕ} {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α l} {θ : L.BoundedFormula α l.succ}
variable {v : α → M} {xs : Fin l → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_bot FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_bot
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v xs ↔ ¬φ.Realize v xs :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_not FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_not
@[simp]
theorem realize_bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin l))) :
(t₁.bdEqual t₂).Realize v xs ↔ t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_bd_equal FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_bdEqual
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ True := by simp [Top.top]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_top FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_top
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∧ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp [Inf.inf, Realize]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_inf FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_inf (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_foldr_inf FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs → ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [Realize]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_imp FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_imp
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula ts).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_rel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_rel
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₁ t).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_rel₁ FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_rel₁
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v xs ↔
RelMap R ![t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs), t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_rel₂ FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∨ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [realize, Sup.sup, realize_not, eq_iff_iff]
tauto
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_sup FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_sup (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥).Realize v xs ↔ ∃ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp_rw [List.foldr_cons, realize_sup, ih, List.mem_cons, or_and_right, exists_or,
exists_eq_left]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_foldr_sup FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_all : (all θ).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_all FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_all
@[simp]
theorem realize_ex : θ.ex.Realize v xs ↔ ∃ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) := by
rw [BoundedFormula.ex, realize_not, realize_all, not_forall]
simp_rw [realize_not, Classical.not_not]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_ex FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_ex
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs) := by
simp only [BoundedFormula.iff, realize_inf, realize_imp, and_imp, ← iff_def]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_iff FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_iff
theorem realize_castLE_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α m}
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.castLE h').Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ cast h) := by
subst h
simp only [castLE_rfl, cast_refl, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_cast_le_of_eq FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_castLE_of_eq
theorem realize_mapTermRel_id [L'.Structure M]
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{v' : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) (xs : Fin n → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs) = t.realize (Sum.elim v xs))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).Realize v' xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
· simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, id]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_map_term_rel_id FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_id
theorem realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe [L'.Structure M] {k : ℕ}
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin (k + n)))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
(v : ∀ {n}, (Fin (k + n) → M) → α → M) {v' : β → M} (xs : Fin (k + n) → M)
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) (xs' : Fin (k + n) → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs') = t.realize (Sum.elim (v xs') (xs' ∘ Fin.natAdd _)))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x)
(hv : ∀ (n) (xs : Fin (k + n) → M) (x : M), @v (n + 1) (snoc xs x : Fin _ → M) = v xs) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun n => castLE (add_assoc _ _ _).symm.le).Realize v' xs ↔
φ.Realize (v xs) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd _) := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, hv]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_map_term_rel_add_cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {m n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {g : α → Sum β (Fin m)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (m + n) → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ Fin.castAdd n) ∘ g) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd m) := by
rw [relabel, realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe] <;> intros <;> simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_relabel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_relabel
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + n') → M}
(hmn : m + n' ≤ n + 1) :
(φ.liftAt n' m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') := by
rw [liftAt]
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 k _ ih3
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
· simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1 hmn, ih2 hmn]
· have h : k + 1 + n' = k + n' + 1 := by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1 n', ← add_assoc]
simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_castLE_of_eq h, ih3 (hmn.trans k.succ.le_succ)]
refine forall_congr' fun x => iff_eq_eq.mpr (congr rfl (funext (Fin.lastCases ?_ fun i => ?_)))
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, val_last, snoc_last]
by_cases h : k < m
· rw [if_pos h]
refine (congr rfl (ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
simp only [coe_cast, coe_castAdd, val_last, self_eq_add_right]
refine le_antisymm
(le_of_add_le_add_left ((hmn.trans (Nat.succ_le_of_lt h)).trans ?_)) n'.zero_le
rw [add_zero]
· rw [if_neg h]
refine (congr rfl (ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
simp
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, Fin.snoc_castSucc]
refine (congr rfl (ext ?_)).trans (snoc_castSucc _ _ _)
simp only [coe_castSucc, coe_cast]
split_ifs <;> simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_lift_at FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_liftAt
theorem realize_liftAt_one {n m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + 1) → M}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(φ.liftAt 1 m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then castSucc i else i.succ) := by
simp [realize_liftAt (add_le_add_right hmn 1), castSucc]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_lift_at_one FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_liftAt_one
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin (n + 1) → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ castSucc) := by
rw [realize_liftAt_one (refl n), iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_))
rw [if_pos i.is_lt]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_lift_at_one_self FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_liftAt_one_self
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.subst tf).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (fun a => (tf a).realize v) xs :=
realize_mapTermRel_id
(fun n t x => by
rw [Term.realize_subst]
rcongr a
cases a
· simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Function.comp_apply, Term.realize_relabel, Sum.elim_comp_inl]
· rfl)
(by simp)
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_subst FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_subst
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑φ.freeVarFinset ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.restrictFreeVar (Set.inclusion h)).Realize (v ∘ (↑)) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize, ih1, ih2]
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_restrict_free_var FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquiv [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{n} {φ : L[[α]].BoundedFormula β n} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquiv φ).Realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun n R xs => ?_
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← (lhomWithConstants L α).map_onRelation
(Equiv.sumEmpty (L.Relations n) ((constantsOn α).Relations n) R) xs]
rcongr
cases' R with R R
· simp
· exact isEmptyElim R
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_constants_vars_equiv FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_constantsVarsEquiv
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabelEquiv {g : α ≃ β} {k} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α k} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin k → M} : (relabelEquiv g φ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) xs := by
simp only [relabelEquiv, mapTermRelEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_refl]
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => ?_) fun _ _ _ => rfl
simp only [relabelEquiv_apply, Term.realize_relabel]
refine congr (congr rfl ?_) rfl
ext (i | i) <;> rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_relabel_equiv FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_relabelEquiv
variable [Nonempty M]
theorem realize_all_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).all.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
inhabit M
simp only [realize_all, realize_liftAt_one_self]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h a => ?_⟩
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp (h default)
simp
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp h
simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_all_lift_at_one_self FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_all_liftAt_one_self
theorem realize_toPrenexImpRight {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n} (hφ : IsQF φ) (hψ : IsPrenex ψ)
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.toPrenexImpRight ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs := by
induction' hψ with _ _ hψ _ _ _hψ ih _ _ _hψ ih
· rw [hψ.toPrenexImpRight]
· refine _root_.trans (forall_congr' fun _ => ih hφ.liftAt) ?_
simp only [realize_imp, realize_liftAt_one_self, snoc_comp_castSucc, realize_all]
exact ⟨fun h1 a h2 => h1 h2 a, fun h1 h2 a => h1 a h2⟩
· unfold toPrenexImpRight
rw [realize_ex]
refine _root_.trans (exists_congr fun _ => ih hφ.liftAt) ?_
simp only [realize_imp, realize_liftAt_one_self, snoc_comp_castSucc, realize_ex]
refine ⟨?_, fun h' => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ h
exact ⟨a, ha h⟩
· by_cases h : φ.Realize v xs
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h' h
exact ⟨a, fun _ => ha⟩
· inhabit M
exact ⟨default, fun h'' => (h h'').elim⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_to_prenex_imp_right FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenexImpRight
theorem realize_toPrenexImp {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n} (hφ : IsPrenex φ) (hψ : IsPrenex ψ)
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.toPrenexImp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs := by
revert ψ
induction' hφ with _ _ hφ _ _ _hφ ih _ _ _hφ ih <;> intro ψ hψ
· rw [hφ.toPrenexImp]
exact realize_toPrenexImpRight hφ hψ
· unfold toPrenexImp
rw [realize_ex]
refine _root_.trans (exists_congr fun _ => ih hψ.liftAt) ?_
simp only [realize_imp, realize_liftAt_one_self, snoc_comp_castSucc, realize_all]
refine ⟨?_, fun h' => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ h
exact ha (h a)
· by_cases h : ψ.Realize v xs
· inhabit M
exact ⟨default, fun _h'' => h⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := not_forall.1 (h ∘ h')
exact ⟨a, fun h => (ha h).elim⟩
· refine _root_.trans (forall_congr' fun _ => ih hψ.liftAt) ?_
simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_to_prenex_imp FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenexImp
@[simp]
theorem realize_toPrenex (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M} :
∀ {xs : Fin n → M}, φ.toPrenex.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f1 f2 h1 h2 _ _ h
· exact Iff.rfl
· exact Iff.rfl
· exact Iff.rfl
· intros
rw [toPrenex, realize_toPrenexImp f1.toPrenex_isPrenex f2.toPrenex_isPrenex, realize_imp,
realize_imp, h1, h2]
· intros
rw [realize_all, toPrenex, realize_all]
exact forall_congr' fun a => h
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_to_prenex FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenex
end BoundedFormula
-- Porting note: no `protected` attribute in Lean4
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.falsum bounded_formula.equal bounded_formula.rel
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.imp bounded_formula.all
namespace LHom
open BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_onBoundedFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] {n : ℕ}
(ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.onBoundedFormula ψ).Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs := by
induction' ψ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_bdEqual, realize_onTerm]
rfl
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_rel, LHom.map_onRelation,
Function.comp_apply, realize_onTerm]
rfl
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih1, ih2, realize_imp]
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih3, realize_all]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onBoundedFormula
end LHom
-- Porting note: no `protected` attribute in Lean4
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.falsum bounded_formula.equal bounded_formula.rel
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.imp bounded_formula.all
namespace Formula
/-- A formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
nonrec def Realize (φ : L.Formula α) (v : α → M) : Prop :=
φ.Realize v default
#align first_order.language.formula.realize FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize
variable {φ ψ : L.Formula α} {v : α → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v ↔ ¬φ.Realize v :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_not FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_not
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_bot FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_bot
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ True :=
BoundedFormula.realize_top
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_top FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_top
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∧ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_inf
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_inf FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v → ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_imp
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_imp FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_imp
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term α} :
(R.formula ts).Realize v ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_rel.trans (by simp)
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_rel FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_rel
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₁ t).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_rel₁ FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_rel₁
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_rel₂ FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∨ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_sup
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_sup FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v ↔ (φ.Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v) :=
BoundedFormula.realize_iff
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_iff FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iff
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {φ : L.Formula α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) := by
rw [Realize, Realize, relabel, BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, iff_eq_eq, Fin.castAdd_zero]
exact congr rfl (funext finZeroElim)
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_relabel
theorem realize_relabel_sum_inr (φ : L.Formula (Fin n)) {v : Empty → M} {x : Fin n → M} :
(BoundedFormula.relabel Sum.inr φ).Realize v x ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, Formula.Realize, Sum.elim_comp_inr, Fin.castAdd_zero,
cast_refl, Function.comp_id,
Subsingleton.elim (x ∘ (natAdd n : Fin 0 → Fin n)) default]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_relabel_sum_inr FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_relabel_sum_inr
@[simp]
theorem realize_equal {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {x : α → M} :
(t₁.equal t₂).Realize x ↔ t₁.realize x = t₂.realize x := by simp [Term.equal, Realize]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equal FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equal
@[simp]
theorem realize_graph {f : L.Functions n} {x : Fin n → M} {y : M} :
(Formula.graph f).Realize (Fin.cons y x : _ → M) ↔ funMap f x = y := by
simp only [Formula.graph, Term.realize, realize_equal, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ]
rw [eq_comm]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_graph FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_graph
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (ψ : L.Formula α)
{v : α → M} : (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v :=
φ.realize_onBoundedFormula ψ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_formula FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onFormula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.setOf_realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Formula α) : (setOf (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize : Set (α → M)) = setOf ψ.Realize := by
ext
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.set_of_realize_on_formula FirstOrder.Language.LHom.setOf_realize_onFormula
variable (M)
/-- A sentence can be evaluated as true or false in a structure. -/
nonrec def Sentence.Realize (φ : L.Sentence) : Prop :=
φ.Realize (default : _ → M)
#align first_order.language.sentence.realize FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Sentence.Realize]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Sentence.Realize
@[simp]
theorem Sentence.realize_not {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ φ.not ↔ ¬M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.sentence.realize_not FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.realize_not
namespace Formula
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm_con [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M] (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) :
((equivSentence.symm φ).Realize fun a => (L.con a : M)) ↔ φ.Realize M := by
simp only [equivSentence, _root_.Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.coe_trans, Realize,
BoundedFormula.realize_relabelEquiv, Function.comp]
refine _root_.trans ?_ BoundedFormula.realize_constantsVarsEquiv
rw [iff_iff_eq]
congr with (_ | a)
· simp
· cases a
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equiv_sentence_symm_con FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equivSentence_symm_con
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence [L[[α]].Structure M] [(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M]
(φ : L.Formula α) : (equivSentence φ).Realize M ↔ φ.Realize fun a => (L.con a : M) := by
rw [← realize_equivSentence_symm_con M (equivSentence φ), _root_.Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equiv_sentence FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equivSentence
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) (v : α → M) :
(equivSentence.symm φ).Realize v ↔
@Sentence.Realize _ M (@Language.withConstantsStructure L M _ α (constantsOn.structure v))
φ :=
letI := constantsOn.structure v
realize_equivSentence_symm_con M φ
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equiv_sentence_symm FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equivSentence_symm
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onSentence [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ.onSentence ψ ↔ M ⊨ ψ :=
φ.realize_onFormula ψ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_sentence FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onSentence
variable (L)
/-- The complete theory of a structure `M` is the set of all sentences `M` satisfies. -/
def completeTheory : L.Theory :=
{ φ | M ⊨ φ }
#align first_order.language.complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.completeTheory
variable (N)
/-- Two structures are elementarily equivalent when they satisfy the same sentences. -/
def ElementarilyEquivalent : Prop :=
L.completeTheory M = L.completeTheory N
#align first_order.language.elementarily_equivalent FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent
@[inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent]
scoped[FirstOrder]
notation:25 A " ≅[" L "] " B:50 => FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent L A B
variable {L} {M} {N}
@[simp]
theorem mem_completeTheory {φ : Sentence L} : φ ∈ L.completeTheory M ↔ M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.mem_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.mem_completeTheory
theorem elementarilyEquivalent_iff : M ≅[L] N ↔ ∀ φ : L.Sentence, M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
simp only [ElementarilyEquivalent, Set.ext_iff, completeTheory, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align first_order.language.elementarily_equivalent_iff FirstOrder.Language.elementarilyEquivalent_iff
variable (M)
/-- A model of a theory is a structure in which every sentence is realized as true. -/
class Theory.Model (T : L.Theory) : Prop where
realize_of_mem : ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Theory.Model]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Theory.Model
variable {M} (T : L.Theory)
@[simp default-10]
theorem Theory.model_iff : M ⊨ T ↔ ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ :=
⟨fun h => h.realize_of_mem, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_iff FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_iff
theorem Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem [M ⊨ T] {φ : L.Sentence} (h : φ ∈ T) : M ⊨ φ :=
Theory.Model.realize_of_mem φ h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem FirstOrder.Language.Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem LHom.onTheory_model [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (T : L.Theory) :
M ⊨ φ.onTheory T ↔ M ⊨ T := by simp [Theory.model_iff, LHom.onTheory]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.on_Theory_model FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onTheory_model
variable {T}
instance model_empty : M ⊨ (∅ : L.Theory) :=
⟨fun φ hφ => (Set.not_mem_empty φ hφ).elim⟩
#align first_order.language.model_empty FirstOrder.Language.model_empty
namespace Theory
theorem Model.mono {T' : L.Theory} (_h : M ⊨ T') (hs : T ⊆ T') : M ⊨ T :=
⟨fun _φ hφ => T'.realize_sentence_of_mem (hs hφ)⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model.mono FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model.mono
theorem Model.union {T' : L.Theory} (h : M ⊨ T) (h' : M ⊨ T') : M ⊨ T ∪ T' := by
simp only [model_iff, Set.mem_union] at *
exact fun φ hφ => hφ.elim (h _) (h' _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model.union FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model.union
@[simp]
theorem model_union_iff {T' : L.Theory} : M ⊨ T ∪ T' ↔ M ⊨ T ∧ M ⊨ T' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono Set.subset_union_left, h.mono Set.subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_union_iff FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_union_iff
theorem model_singleton_iff {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ ({φ} : L.Theory) ↔ M ⊨ φ := by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_singleton_iff FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_singleton_iff
theorem model_iff_subset_completeTheory : M ⊨ T ↔ T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
T.model_iff
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_iff_subset_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory
theorem completeTheory.subset [MT : M ⊨ T] : T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
model_iff_subset_completeTheory.1 MT
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_theory.subset FirstOrder.Language.Theory.completeTheory.subset
end Theory
instance model_completeTheory : M ⊨ L.completeTheory M :=
Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory.2 (subset_refl _)
#align first_order.language.model_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.model_completeTheory
variable (M N)
theorem realize_iff_of_model_completeTheory [N ⊨ L.completeTheory M] (φ : L.Sentence) :
N ⊨ φ ↔ M ⊨ φ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← Sentence.realize_not] at *
exact (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem (mem_completeTheory.2 h)
#align first_order.language.realize_iff_of_model_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.realize_iff_of_model_completeTheory
variable {M N}
namespace BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_alls {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.alls.Realize v ↔ ∀ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.forall_iff.symm
· simp only [alls, ih, Realize]
exact ⟨fun h xs => Fin.snoc_init_self xs ▸ h _ _, fun h xs x => h (Fin.snoc xs x)⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_alls FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_alls
@[simp]
theorem realize_exs {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.exs.Realize v ↔ ∃ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.exists_iff.symm
· simp only [BoundedFormula.exs, ih, realize_ex]
constructor
· rintro ⟨xs, x, h⟩
exact ⟨_, h⟩
· rintro ⟨xs, h⟩
rw [← Fin.snoc_init_self xs] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_exs FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_exs
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iAlls
[Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} : (φ.iAlls f).Realize v ↔
∀ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin γ))
rw [Formula.iAlls]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_alls, realize_relabel, Function.comp,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
refine Equiv.forall_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
theorem realize_iAlls [Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iAlls f) v v' ↔
∀ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iAlls, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iExs
[Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} : (φ.iExs f).Realize v ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin γ))
rw [Formula.iExs]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_exs, realize_relabel, Function.comp,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_exists]
refine Equiv.forall_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Semantics.lean | 957 | 961 | theorem realize_iExs [Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iExs f) v v' ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by |
rw [← Formula.realize_iExs, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Uniformity
#align_import topology.instances.discrete from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
/-!
# Instances related to the discrete topology
We prove that the discrete topology is
* first-countable,
* second-countable for an encodable type,
* equal to the order topology in linear orders which are also `PredOrder` and `SuccOrder`,
* metrizable.
When importing this file and `Data.Nat.SuccPred`, the instances `SecondCountableTopology ℕ`
and `OrderTopology ℕ` become available.
-/
open Order Set TopologicalSpace Filter
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
instance (priority := 100) DiscreteTopology.firstCountableTopology [DiscreteTopology α] :
FirstCountableTopology α where
nhds_generated_countable := by rw [nhds_discrete]; exact isCountablyGenerated_pure
#align discrete_topology.first_countable_topology DiscreteTopology.firstCountableTopology
instance (priority := 100) DiscreteTopology.secondCountableTopology_of_countable
[hd : DiscreteTopology α] [Countable α] : SecondCountableTopology α :=
haveI : ∀ i : α, SecondCountableTopology (↥({i} : Set α)) := fun i =>
{ is_open_generated_countable :=
⟨{univ}, countable_singleton _, by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]⟩ }
secondCountableTopology_of_countable_cover (singletons_open_iff_discrete.mpr hd)
(iUnion_of_singleton α)
#align discrete_topology.second_countable_topology_of_encodable DiscreteTopology.secondCountableTopology_of_countable
@[deprecated DiscreteTopology.secondCountableTopology_of_countable (since := "2024-03-11")]
theorem DiscreteTopology.secondCountableTopology_of_encodable {α : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] [Countable α] : SecondCountableTopology α :=
DiscreteTopology.secondCountableTopology_of_countable
#align discrete_topology.second_countable_topology_of_countable DiscreteTopology.secondCountableTopology_of_countable
theorem bot_topologicalSpace_eq_generateFrom_of_pred_succOrder [PartialOrder α] [PredOrder α]
[SuccOrder α] [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] :
(⊥ : TopologicalSpace α) = generateFrom { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a } := by
refine (eq_bot_of_singletons_open fun a => ?_).symm
have h_singleton_eq_inter : {a} = Iio (succ a) ∩ Ioi (pred a) := by
suffices h_singleton_eq_inter' : {a} = Iic a ∩ Ici a by
rw [h_singleton_eq_inter', ← Ioi_pred, ← Iio_succ]
rw [inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iic, Icc_self a]
rw [h_singleton_eq_inter]
letI := Preorder.topology α
apply IsOpen.inter
· exact isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem ⟨succ a, Or.inr rfl⟩
· exact isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem ⟨pred a, Or.inl rfl⟩
#align bot_topological_space_eq_generate_from_of_pred_succ_order bot_topologicalSpace_eq_generateFrom_of_pred_succOrder
theorem discreteTopology_iff_orderTopology_of_pred_succ' [PartialOrder α] [PredOrder α]
[SuccOrder α] [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] : DiscreteTopology α ↔ OrderTopology α := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_⟩⟩
· rw [h.eq_bot]
exact bot_topologicalSpace_eq_generateFrom_of_pred_succOrder
· rw [h.topology_eq_generate_intervals]
exact bot_topologicalSpace_eq_generateFrom_of_pred_succOrder.symm
#align discrete_topology_iff_order_topology_of_pred_succ' discreteTopology_iff_orderTopology_of_pred_succ'
instance (priority := 100) DiscreteTopology.orderTopology_of_pred_succ' [h : DiscreteTopology α]
[PartialOrder α] [PredOrder α] [SuccOrder α] [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] : OrderTopology α :=
discreteTopology_iff_orderTopology_of_pred_succ'.1 h
#align discrete_topology.order_topology_of_pred_succ' DiscreteTopology.orderTopology_of_pred_succ'
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/Discrete.lean | 80 | 108 | theorem LinearOrder.bot_topologicalSpace_eq_generateFrom [LinearOrder α] [PredOrder α]
[SuccOrder α] : (⊥ : TopologicalSpace α) = generateFrom { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a } := by |
refine (eq_bot_of_singletons_open fun a => ?_).symm
have h_singleton_eq_inter : {a} = Iic a ∩ Ici a := by rw [inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iic, Icc_self a]
by_cases ha_top : IsTop a
· rw [ha_top.Iic_eq, inter_comm, inter_univ] at h_singleton_eq_inter
by_cases ha_bot : IsBot a
· rw [ha_bot.Ici_eq] at h_singleton_eq_inter
rw [h_singleton_eq_inter]
-- Porting note: Specified instance for `isOpen_univ` explicitly to fix an error.
apply @isOpen_univ _ (generateFrom { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a })
· rw [isBot_iff_isMin] at ha_bot
rw [← Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha_bot] at h_singleton_eq_inter
rw [h_singleton_eq_inter]
exact isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem ⟨pred a, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rw [isTop_iff_isMax] at ha_top
rw [← Iio_succ_of_not_isMax ha_top] at h_singleton_eq_inter
by_cases ha_bot : IsBot a
· rw [ha_bot.Ici_eq, inter_univ] at h_singleton_eq_inter
rw [h_singleton_eq_inter]
exact isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem ⟨succ a, Or.inr rfl⟩
· rw [isBot_iff_isMin] at ha_bot
rw [← Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha_bot] at h_singleton_eq_inter
rw [h_singleton_eq_inter]
-- Porting note: Specified instance for `IsOpen.inter` explicitly to fix an error.
letI := Preorder.topology α
apply IsOpen.inter
· exact isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem ⟨succ a, Or.inr rfl⟩
· exact isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem ⟨pred a, Or.inl rfl⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
#align ennreal.to_real_add ENNReal.toReal_add
theorem toReal_sub_of_le {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : b ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
(a - b).toReal = a.toReal - b.toReal := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_le_ne_top ha h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_sub, ENNReal.coe_toReal, NNReal.coe_sub (ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mp h)]
#align ennreal.to_real_sub_of_le ENNReal.toReal_sub_of_le
theorem le_toReal_sub {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal - b.toReal ≤ (a - b).toReal := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
induction a
· simp
· simp only [← coe_sub, NNReal.sub_def, Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_toReal]
exact le_max_left _ _
#align ennreal.le_to_real_sub ENNReal.le_toReal_sub
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, top_toReal, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, top_toReal, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
#align ennreal.to_real_add_le ENNReal.toReal_add_le
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
#align ennreal.of_real_add ENNReal.ofReal_add
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
#align ennreal.of_real_add_le ENNReal.ofReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
#align ennreal.to_real_le_to_real ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
#align ennreal.to_real_mono ENNReal.toReal_mono
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
#align ennreal.to_real_lt_to_real ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
#align ennreal.to_real_strict_mono ENNReal.toReal_strict_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_mono ENNReal.toNNReal_mono
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
/-- If `a ≤ b + c` and `a = ∞` whenever `b = ∞` or `c = ∞`, then
`ENNReal.toReal a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b + ENNReal.toReal c`. This lemma is useful to transfer
triangle-like inequalities from `ENNReal`s to `Real`s. -/
theorem toReal_le_add' (hle : a ≤ b + c) (hb : b = ∞ → a = ∞) (hc : c = ∞ → a = ∞) :
a.toReal ≤ b.toReal + c.toReal := by
refine le_trans (toReal_mono' hle ?_) toReal_add_le
simpa only [add_eq_top, or_imp] using And.intro hb hc
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
/-- If `a ≤ b + c`, `b ≠ ∞`, and `c ≠ ∞`, then
`ENNReal.toReal a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b + ENNReal.toReal c`. This lemma is useful to transfer
triangle-like inequalities from `ENNReal`s to `Real`s. -/
theorem toReal_le_add (hle : a ≤ b + c) (hb : b ≠ ∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
a.toReal ≤ b.toReal + c.toReal :=
toReal_le_add' hle (flip absurd hb) (flip absurd hc)
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_le_to_nnreal ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_strict_mono ENNReal.toNNReal_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal ENNReal.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hr hp).2 h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hp hr).2 h, max_eq_left]
#align ennreal.to_real_max ENNReal.toReal_max
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hr hp).2 h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal hp hr).2 h, min_eq_right]
#align ennreal.to_real_min ENNReal.toReal_min
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
#align ennreal.to_real_sup ENNReal.toReal_sup
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
#align ennreal.to_real_inf ENNReal.toReal_inf
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_pos_iff ENNReal.toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_pos ENNReal.toNNReal_pos
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
#align ennreal.to_real_pos_iff ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
#align ennreal.to_real_pos ENNReal.toReal_pos
@[gcongr]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
#align ennreal.of_real_le_of_real ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
#align ennreal.of_real_le_of_le_to_real ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
#align ennreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
#align ennreal.of_real_eq_of_real_iff ENNReal.ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
#align ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
#align ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
#align ennreal.of_real_pos ENNReal.ofReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
#align ennreal.of_real_eq_zero ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 0 = ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
eq_comm.trans ofReal_eq_zero
#align ennreal.zero_eq_of_real ENNReal.zero_eq_ofReal
alias ⟨_, ofReal_of_nonpos⟩ := ofReal_eq_zero
#align ennreal.of_real_of_nonpos ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_natCast {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal p < n ↔ p < n := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn.bot_lt)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ofReal_lt_nat_cast := ofReal_lt_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_one {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < 1 ↔ p < 1 := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_natCast one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofNat {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal p < no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ p < OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma natCast_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} {p : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ n ≤ p := by
simp only [← not_lt, ofReal_lt_natCast hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_le_ofReal := natCast_le_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma one_le_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 1 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 1 ≤ p := by
exact mod_cast natCast_le_ofReal one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {p : ℝ} :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ p :=
natCast_le_ofReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ofReal_le_nat_cast := ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ r ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : n < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ n < r :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_lt_ofReal := natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_ofReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ 1 < r := coe_lt_coe.trans Real.one_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {r : ℝ} :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ OfNat.ofNat n < r :=
natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal r = n ↔ r = n :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans <| Real.toNNReal_eq_natCast h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ofReal_eq_nat_cast := ofReal_eq_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans Real.toNNReal_eq_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r = no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
theorem ofReal_sub (p : ℝ) {q : ℝ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p - q) = ENNReal.ofReal p - ENNReal.ofReal q := by
obtain h | h := le_total p q
· rw [ofReal_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos_of_le h), tsub_eq_zero_of_le (ofReal_le_ofReal h)]
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq ofReal_ne_top ?_
rw [← ofReal_add (sub_nonneg_of_le h) hq, sub_add_cancel]
#align ennreal.of_real_sub ENNReal.ofReal_sub
theorem ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
#align ennreal.of_real_le_iff_le_to_real ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal
theorem ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
#align ennreal.of_real_lt_iff_lt_to_real ENNReal.ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal
theorem ofReal_lt_coe_iff {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < b :=
(ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal ha coe_ne_top).trans <| by rw [coe_toReal]
theorem le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hb
#align ennreal.le_of_real_iff_to_real_le ENNReal.le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le
theorem toReal_le_of_le_ofReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b) :
ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top ofReal_ne_top h
(le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha hb).1 h
#align ennreal.to_real_le_of_le_of_real ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal
theorem lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt
#align ennreal.lt_of_real_iff_to_real_lt ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt
theorem toReal_lt_of_lt_ofReal {b : ℝ} (h : a < ENNReal.ofReal b) : ENNReal.toReal a < b :=
(lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt h.ne_top).1 h
theorem ofReal_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_mul, Real.toNNReal_mul hp]
#align ennreal.of_real_mul ENNReal.ofReal_mul
theorem ofReal_mul' {p q : ℝ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [mul_comm, ofReal_mul hq, mul_comm]
#align ennreal.of_real_mul' ENNReal.ofReal_mul'
theorem ofReal_pow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (n : ℕ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p ^ n) = ENNReal.ofReal p ^ n := by
rw [ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hp, ← coe_pow, ← ofReal_coe_nnreal, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_mk]
#align ennreal.of_real_pow ENNReal.ofReal_pow
theorem ofReal_nsmul {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal (n • x) = n • ENNReal.ofReal x := by
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_natCast n, ← ofReal_mul n.cast_nonneg]
#align ennreal.of_real_nsmul ENNReal.ofReal_nsmul
theorem ofReal_inv_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : ENNReal.ofReal x⁻¹ = (ENNReal.ofReal x)⁻¹ := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← @coe_inv (Real.toNNReal x) (by simp [hx]), coe_inj,
← Real.toNNReal_inv]
#align ennreal.of_real_inv_of_pos ENNReal.ofReal_inv_of_pos
theorem ofReal_div_of_pos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
ENNReal.ofReal (x / y) = ENNReal.ofReal x / ENNReal.ofReal y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ofReal_mul' (inv_nonneg.2 hy.le), ofReal_inv_of_pos hy]
#align ennreal.of_real_div_of_pos ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : (a * b).toNNReal = a.toNNReal * b.toNNReal :=
WithTop.untop'_zero_mul a b
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_mul ENNReal.toNNReal_mul
theorem toNNReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by simp
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_mul_top ENNReal.toNNReal_mul_top
theorem toNNReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by simp
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_top_mul ENNReal.toNNReal_top_mul
@[simp]
theorem smul_toNNReal (a : ℝ≥0) (b : ℝ≥0∞) : (a • b).toNNReal = a * b.toNNReal := by
change ((a : ℝ≥0∞) * b).toNNReal = a * b.toNNReal
simp only [ENNReal.toNNReal_mul, ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
#align ennreal.smul_to_nnreal ENNReal.smul_toNNReal
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: upgrade to `→*₀`
/-- `ENNReal.toNNReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toNNRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := ENNReal.toNNReal
map_one' := toNNReal_coe
map_mul' _ _ := toNNReal_mul
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_hom ENNReal.toNNRealHom
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toNNReal = a.toNNReal ^ n :=
toNNRealHom.map_pow a n
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_pow ENNReal.toNNReal_pow
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).toNNReal = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i).toNNReal :=
map_prod toNNRealHom _ _
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_prod ENNReal.toNNReal_prod
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: upgrade to `→*₀`
/-- `ENNReal.toReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →* ℝ :=
(NNReal.toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ).comp toNNRealHom
#align ennreal.to_real_hom ENNReal.toRealHom
@[simp]
theorem toReal_mul : (a * b).toReal = a.toReal * b.toReal :=
toRealHom.map_mul a b
#align ennreal.to_real_mul ENNReal.toReal_mul
theorem toReal_nsmul (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (n • a).toReal = n • a.toReal := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toReal = a.toReal ^ n :=
toRealHom.map_pow a n
#align ennreal.to_real_pow ENNReal.toReal_pow
@[simp]
theorem toReal_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).toReal = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i).toReal :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
#align ennreal.to_real_prod ENNReal.toReal_prod
theorem toReal_ofReal_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ENNReal.toReal (ENNReal.ofReal c * a) = c * ENNReal.toReal a := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h]
#align ennreal.to_real_of_real_mul ENNReal.toReal_ofReal_mul
theorem toReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by
rw [toReal_mul, top_toReal, mul_zero]
#align ennreal.to_real_mul_top ENNReal.toReal_mul_top
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 454 | 456 | theorem toReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by |
rw [mul_comm]
exact toReal_mul_top _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs products, sums, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, sum, disjoint union, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
#align mem_nhds_subtype mem_nhds_subtype
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
#align nhds_subtype nhds_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
#align nhds_within_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_ne_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align discrete_topology_subtype_iff discreteTopology_subtype_iff
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
#align cofinite_topology CofiniteTopology
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
#align cofinite_topology.of CofiniteTopology.of
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff' CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff'
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
#align cofinite_topology.is_closed_iff CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
#align cofinite_topology.nhds_eq CofiniteTopology.nhds_eq
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
#align cofinite_topology.mem_nhds_iff CofiniteTopology.mem_nhds_iff
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
[TopologicalSpace ε] [TopologicalSpace ζ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean 4 fails to deduce implicit args
@[simp] theorem continuous_prod_mk {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} :
(Continuous fun x => (f x, g x)) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
(@continuous_inf_rng X (Y × Z) _ _ (TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _)).trans <|
continuous_induced_rng.and continuous_induced_rng
#align continuous_prod_mk continuous_prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_fst : Continuous (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).1
#align continuous_fst continuous_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.fst {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).1 :=
continuous_fst.comp hf
#align continuous.fst Continuous.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.fst' {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.fst :=
hf.comp continuous_fst
#align continuous.fst' Continuous.fst'
theorem continuousAt_fst {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.fst p :=
continuous_fst.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_fst continuousAt_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.fst {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).1) x :=
continuousAt_fst.comp hf
#align continuous_at.fst ContinuousAt.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst' {f : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst' ContinuousAt.fst'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst'' {f : X → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.fst) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst'' ContinuousAt.fst''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).1) l (𝓝 <| p.1) :=
continuousAt_fst.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_snd : Continuous (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).2
#align continuous_snd continuous_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.snd {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).2 :=
continuous_snd.comp hf
#align continuous.snd Continuous.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.snd' {f : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.snd :=
hf.comp continuous_snd
#align continuous.snd' Continuous.snd'
theorem continuousAt_snd {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.snd p :=
continuous_snd.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_snd continuousAt_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.snd {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).2) x :=
continuousAt_snd.comp hf
#align continuous_at.snd ContinuousAt.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd' {f : Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd' ContinuousAt.snd'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd'' {f : Y → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.snd) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd'' ContinuousAt.snd''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).2) l (𝓝 <| p.2) :=
continuousAt_snd.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.prod_mk {f : Z → X} {g : Z → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => (f x, g x) :=
continuous_prod_mk.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.prod_mk Continuous.prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk (x : X) : Continuous fun y : Y => (x, y) :=
continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align continuous.prod.mk Continuous.Prod.mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk_left (y : Y) : Continuous fun x : X => (x, y) :=
continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const
#align continuous.prod.mk_left Continuous.Prod.mk_left
/-- If `f x y` is continuous in `x` for all `y ∈ s`,
then the set of `x` such that `f x` maps `s` to `t` is closed. -/
lemma IsClosed.setOf_mapsTo {α : Type*} {f : X → α → Z} {s : Set α} {t : Set Z} (ht : IsClosed t)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Continuous (f · a)) : IsClosed {x | MapsTo (f x) s t} := by
simpa only [MapsTo, setOf_forall] using isClosed_biInter fun y hy ↦ ht.preimage (hf y hy)
theorem Continuous.comp₂ {g : X × Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w) :=
hg.comp <| he.prod_mk hf
#align continuous.comp₂ Continuous.comp₂
theorem Continuous.comp₃ {g : X × Y × Z → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) :
Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w) :=
hg.comp₂ he <| hf.prod_mk hk
#align continuous.comp₃ Continuous.comp₃
theorem Continuous.comp₄ {g : X × Y × Z × ζ → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) {l : W → ζ}
(hl : Continuous l) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w, l w) :=
hg.comp₃ he hf <| hk.prod_mk hl
#align continuous.comp₄ Continuous.comp₄
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.prod_map {f : Z → X} {g : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun p : Z × W => (f p.1, g p.2) :=
hf.fst'.prod_mk hg.snd'
#align continuous.prod_map Continuous.prod_map
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta1; haveI := tb1; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta1 tb1 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_left₂ continuous_inf_dom_left₂
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta2; haveI := tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta2 tb2 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_right₂ continuous_inf_dom_right₂
/-- A version of `continuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_sInf_dom₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {tas : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
{tbs : Set (TopologicalSpace Y)} {tX : TopologicalSpace X} {tY : TopologicalSpace Y}
{tc : TopologicalSpace Z} (hX : tX ∈ tas) (hY : tY ∈ tbs)
(hf : Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf tas; haveI := sInf tbs;
exact @Continuous _ _ _ tc fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have hX := continuous_sInf_dom hX continuous_id
have hY := continuous_sInf_dom hY continuous_id
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ tX tY (sInf tas) (sInf tbs) _ _ hX hY
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_continuous_id
#align continuous_Inf_dom₂ continuous_sInf_dom₂
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds {p : X → Prop} {x : X} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (y : Y) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).1 :=
continuousAt_fst h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds {p : Y → Prop} {y : Y} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).2 :=
continuousAt_snd h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds {px : X → Prop} {x} (hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, px x) {py : Y → Prop}
{y} (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, py y) : ∀ᶠ p in 𝓝 (x, y), px (p : X × Y).1 ∧ py p.2 :=
(hx.prod_inl_nhds y).and (hy.prod_inr_nhds x)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds
theorem continuous_swap : Continuous (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) :=
continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst
#align continuous_swap continuous_swap
lemma isClosedMap_swap : IsClosedMap (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) := fun s hs ↦ by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
exact hs.preimage continuous_swap
theorem Continuous.uncurry_left {f : X → Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous (f x) :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk _)
#align continuous_uncurry_left Continuous.uncurry_left
theorem Continuous.uncurry_right {f : X → Y → Z} (y : Y) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous fun a => f a y :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk_left _)
#align continuous_uncurry_right Continuous.uncurry_right
-- 2024-03-09
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_left := Continuous.uncurry_left
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_right := Continuous.uncurry_right
theorem continuous_curry {g : X × Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous g) : Continuous (curry g x) :=
Continuous.uncurry_left x h
#align continuous_curry continuous_curry
theorem IsOpen.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).inter (ht.preimage continuous_snd)
#align is_open.prod IsOpen.prod
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean fails to find `t₁` and `t₂` by unification
theorem nhds_prod_eq {x : X} {y : Y} : 𝓝 (x, y) = 𝓝 x ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, instTopologicalSpaceProd, nhds_inf (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _), nhds_induced, nhds_induced]
#align nhds_prod_eq nhds_prod_eq
-- Porting note: moved from `Topology.ContinuousOn`
theorem nhdsWithin_prod_eq (x : X) (y : Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (x, y) = 𝓝[s] x ×ˢ 𝓝[t] y := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
#align nhds_within_prod_eq nhdsWithin_prod_eq
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝 y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff mem_nhds_prod_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} {tx : Set X} {ty : Set Y} :
s ∈ 𝓝[tx ×ˢ ty] (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[tx] x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝[ty] y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds {ιX ιY : Type*} {px : ιX → Prop} {py : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : (𝓝 x).HasBasis px sx)
(hy : (𝓝 y).HasBasis py sy) :
(𝓝 (x, y)).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => px i.1 ∧ py i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact hx.prod hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds' {ιX ιY : Type*} {pX : ιX → Prop} {pY : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {p : X × Y} (hx : (𝓝 p.1).HasBasis pX sx)
(hy : (𝓝 p.2).HasBasis pY sy) :
(𝓝 p).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => pX i.1 ∧ pY i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 :=
hx.prod_nhds hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds' Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds'
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff' {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).prod_nhds (nhds_basis_opens y)).mem_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Prod.exists, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff' mem_nhds_prod_iff'
theorem Prod.tendsto_iff {X} (seq : X → Y × Z) {f : Filter X} (p : Y × Z) :
Tendsto seq f (𝓝 p) ↔
Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).fst) f (𝓝 p.fst) ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).snd) f (𝓝 p.snd) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.tendsto_prod_iff']
#align prod.tendsto_iff Prod.tendsto_iff
instance [DiscreteTopology X] [DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X × Y) :=
discreteTopology_iff_nhds.2 fun (a, b) => by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete X, nhds_discrete Y, prod_pure_pure]
theorem prod_mem_nhds_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 y := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_mem_prod_iff]
#align prod_mem_nhds_iff prod_mem_nhds_iff
theorem prod_mem_nhds {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hy : t ∈ 𝓝 y) :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) :=
prod_mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
#align prod_mem_nhds prod_mem_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds : IsOpen { p : X × X | Disjoint (𝓝 p.1) (𝓝 p.2) } := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall, mem_setOf_eq]
intro x y h
obtain ⟨U, hU, V, hV, hd⟩ := ((nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y)).mp h
exact mem_nhds_prod_iff'.mpr ⟨U, V, hU.2, hU.1, hV.2, hV.1, fun ⟨x', y'⟩ ⟨hx', hy'⟩ =>
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem hd (hU.2.mem_nhds hx') (hV.2.mem_nhds hy')⟩
#align is_open_set_of_disjoint_nhds_nhds isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, q y) : ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x, y), p z.1 ∧ q z.2 :=
prod_mem_nhds hx hy
#align filter.eventually.prod_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds
theorem nhds_swap (x : X) (y : Y) : 𝓝 (x, y) = (𝓝 (y, x)).map Prod.swap := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.prod_comm, nhds_prod_eq]; rfl
#align nhds_swap nhds_swap
theorem Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds {γ} {x : X} {y : Y} {f : Filter γ} {mx : γ → X} {my : γ → Y}
(hx : Tendsto mx f (𝓝 x)) (hy : Tendsto my f (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun c => (mx c, my c)) f (𝓝 (x, y)) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk hx hy
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds {p : X × Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p x) : ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ y' in 𝓝 y, p (x', y') := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq] at h
exact h.curry
#align filter.eventually.curry_nhds Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.prod {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
hf.prod_mk_nhds hg
#align continuous_at.prod ContinuousAt.prod
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {p : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f p.fst)
(hg : ContinuousAt g p.snd) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) p :=
hf.fst''.prod hg.snd''
#align continuous_at.prod_map ContinuousAt.prod_map
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map' {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) (x, y) :=
hf.fst'.prod hg.snd'
#align continuous_at.prod_map' ContinuousAt.prod_map'
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂ {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf (hg.prod hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_of_eq {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y × Z}
(hf : ContinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂ hg hh
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their first argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_left {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {y : Y} :
Continuous fun x ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
alias Continuous.along_fst := Continuous.curry_left
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their second argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_right {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {x : X} :
Continuous fun y ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
alias Continuous.along_snd := Continuous.curry_right
-- todo: prove a version of `generateFrom_union` with `image2 (∩) s t` in the LHS and use it here
theorem prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq {X Y : Type*} {s : Set (Set X)} {t : Set (Set Y)}
(hs : ⋃₀ s = univ) (ht : ⋃₀ t = univ) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Y (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t) :=
let G := generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t)
le_antisymm
(le_generateFrom fun g ⟨u, hu, v, hv, g_eq⟩ =>
g_eq.symm ▸
@IsOpen.prod _ _ (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) _ _ (GenerateOpen.basic _ hu)
(GenerateOpen.basic _ hv))
(le_inf
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun u hu =>
have : ⋃ v ∈ t, u ×ˢ v = Prod.fst ⁻¹' u := by
simp_rw [← prod_iUnion, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, ht, prod_univ]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.fst ⁻¹' u) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun v =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hv => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun v hv =>
have : ⋃ u ∈ s, u ×ˢ v = Prod.snd ⁻¹' v := by
simp_rw [← iUnion_prod_const, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, hs, univ_prod]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.snd ⁻¹' v) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun u =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hu => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩))
#align prod_generate_from_generate_from_eq prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq
-- todo: use the previous lemma?
theorem prod_eq_generateFrom :
instTopologicalSpaceProd =
generateFrom { g | ∃ (s : Set X) (t : Set Y), IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ g = s ×ˢ t } :=
le_antisymm (le_generateFrom fun g ⟨s, t, hs, ht, g_eq⟩ => g_eq.symm ▸ hs.prod ht)
(le_inf
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨t, univ, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩)
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨univ, t, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩))
#align prod_eq_generate_from prod_eq_generateFrom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: align with `mem_nhds_prod_iff'`
theorem isOpen_prod_iff {s : Set (X × Y)} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s →
∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ a ∈ u ∧ b ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.trans <| by simp_rw [Prod.forall, mem_nhds_prod_iff', and_left_comm]
#align is_open_prod_iff isOpen_prod_iff
/-- A product of induced topologies is induced by the product map -/
theorem prod_induced_induced (f : X → Y) (g : Z → W) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Z (induced f ‹_›) (induced g ‹_›) =
induced (fun p => (f p.1, g p.2)) instTopologicalSpaceProd := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceProd
simp_rw [induced_inf, induced_compose]
rfl
#align prod_induced_induced prod_induced_induced
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology_left
/-- Given a neighborhood `s` of `(x, x)`, then `(x, x)` has a square open neighborhood
that is a subset of `s`. -/
theorem exists_nhds_square {s : Set (X × X)} {x : X} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 (x, x)) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ U ×ˢ U ⊆ s := by
simpa [nhds_prod_eq, (nhds_basis_opens x).prod_self.mem_iff, and_assoc, and_left_comm] using hx
#align exists_nhds_square exists_nhds_square
/-- `Prod.fst` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}`
to `𝓝 x.1`. -/
theorem map_fst_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝[Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}] x) = 𝓝 x.1 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_fst.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hu fun z hz => H _ hz _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hv) rfl
#align map_fst_nhds_within map_fst_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.1 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_fst <| (map_fst_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_fst_nhds map_fst_nhds
/-- The first projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_fst : IsOpenMap (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_fst_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_fst isOpenMap_fst
/-- `Prod.snd` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}`
to `𝓝 x.2`. -/
theorem map_snd_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝[Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}] x) = 𝓝 x.2 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_snd.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hv fun z hz => H _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hu) _ hz rfl
#align map_snd_nhds_within map_snd_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.2 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_snd <| (map_snd_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_snd_nhds map_snd_nhds
/-- The second projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_snd : IsOpenMap (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_snd_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_snd isOpenMap_snd
/-- A product set is open in a product space if and only if each factor is open, or one of them is
empty -/
theorem isOpen_prod_iff' {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} :
IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) ↔ IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
· have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := prod_nonempty_iff.1 h
constructor
· intro (H : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t))
refine Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· show IsOpen s
rw [← fst_image_prod s st.2]
exact isOpenMap_fst _ H
· show IsOpen t
rw [← snd_image_prod st.1 t]
exact isOpenMap_snd _ H
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, not_false_iff, or_false_iff] at H
exact H.1.prod H.2
#align is_open_prod_iff' isOpen_prod_iff'
theorem closure_prod_eq {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} : closure (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ closure t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
simp_rw [mem_prod, mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_prod_eq, prod_neBot]
#align closure_prod_eq closure_prod_eq
theorem interior_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) : interior (s ×ˢ t) = interior s ×ˢ interior t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp only [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_prod, prod_mem_nhds_iff]
#align interior_prod_eq interior_prod_eq
theorem frontier_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
frontier (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ˢ closure t := by
simp only [frontier, closure_prod_eq, interior_prod_eq, prod_diff_prod]
#align frontier_prod_eq frontier_prod_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_prod_univ_eq (s : Set X) :
frontier (s ×ˢ (univ : Set Y)) = frontier s ×ˢ univ := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_prod_univ_eq frontier_prod_univ_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ_prod_eq (s : Set Y) :
frontier ((univ : Set X) ×ˢ s) = univ ×ˢ frontier s := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_univ_prod_eq frontier_univ_prod_eq
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 839 | 844 | theorem map_mem_closure₂ {f : X → Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {u : Set Z}
(hf : Continuous (uncurry f)) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure t)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b ∈ u) : f x y ∈ closure u :=
have H₁ : (x, y) ∈ closure (s ×ˢ t) := by | simpa only [closure_prod_eq] using mk_mem_prod hx hy
have H₂ : MapsTo (uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) u := forall_prod_set.2 h
H₂.closure hf H₁
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.BigOperators
#align_import data.dfinsupp.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6623e6af705e97002a9054c1c05a980180276fc1"
/-!
# Dependent functions with finite support
For a non-dependent version see `data/finsupp.lean`.
## Notation
This file introduces the notation `Π₀ a, β a` as notation for `DFinsupp β`, mirroring the `α →₀ β`
notation used for `Finsupp`. This works for nested binders too, with `Π₀ a b, γ a b` as notation
for `DFinsupp (fun a ↦ DFinsupp (γ a))`.
## Implementation notes
The support is internally represented (in the primed `DFinsupp.support'`) as a `Multiset` that
represents a superset of the true support of the function, quotiented by the always-true relation so
that this does not impact equality. This approach has computational benefits over storing a
`Finset`; it allows us to add together two finitely-supported functions without
having to evaluate the resulting function to recompute its support (which would required
decidability of `b = 0` for `b : β i`).
The true support of the function can still be recovered with `DFinsupp.support`; but these
decidability obligations are now postponed to when the support is actually needed. As a consequence,
there are two ways to sum a `DFinsupp`: with `DFinsupp.sum` which works over an arbitrary function
but requires recomputation of the support and therefore a `Decidable` argument; and with
`DFinsupp.sumAddHom` which requires an additive morphism, using its properties to show that
summing over a superset of the support is sufficient.
`Finsupp` takes an altogether different approach here; it uses `Classical.Decidable` and declares
the `Add` instance as noncomputable. This design difference is independent of the fact that
`DFinsupp` is dependently-typed and `Finsupp` is not; in future, we may want to align these two
definitions, or introduce two more definitions for the other combinations of decisions.
-/
universe u u₁ u₂ v v₁ v₂ v₃ w x y l
variable {ι : Type u} {γ : Type w} {β : ι → Type v} {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
variable (β)
/-- A dependent function `Π i, β i` with finite support, with notation `Π₀ i, β i`.
Note that `DFinsupp.support` is the preferred API for accessing the support of the function,
`DFinsupp.support'` is an implementation detail that aids computability; see the implementation
notes in this file for more information. -/
structure DFinsupp [∀ i, Zero (β i)] : Type max u v where mk' ::
/-- The underlying function of a dependent function with finite support (aka `DFinsupp`). -/
toFun : ∀ i, β i
/-- The support of a dependent function with finite support (aka `DFinsupp`). -/
support' : Trunc { s : Multiset ι // ∀ i, i ∈ s ∨ toFun i = 0 }
#align dfinsupp DFinsupp
variable {β}
/-- `Π₀ i, β i` denotes the type of dependent functions with finite support `DFinsupp β`. -/
notation3 "Π₀ "(...)", "r:(scoped f => DFinsupp f) => r
namespace DFinsupp
section Basic
variable [∀ i, Zero (β i)] [∀ i, Zero (β₁ i)] [∀ i, Zero (β₂ i)]
instance instDFunLike : DFunLike (Π₀ i, β i) ι β :=
⟨fun f => f.toFun, fun ⟨f₁, s₁⟩ ⟨f₂, s₁⟩ ↦ fun (h : f₁ = f₂) ↦ by
subst h
congr
apply Subsingleton.elim ⟩
#align dfinsupp.fun_like DFinsupp.instDFunLike
/-- Helper instance for when there are too many metavariables to apply `DFunLike.coeFunForall`
directly. -/
instance : CoeFun (Π₀ i, β i) fun _ => ∀ i, β i :=
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : Π₀ i, β i) : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.to_fun_eq_coe DFinsupp.toFun_eq_coe
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : Π₀ i, β i} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align dfinsupp.ext DFinsupp.ext
#align dfinsupp.ext_iff DFunLike.ext_iff
#align dfinsupp.coe_fn_injective DFunLike.coe_injective
lemma ne_iff {f g : Π₀ i, β i} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ i, f i ≠ g i := DFunLike.ne_iff
instance : Zero (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨⟨0, Trunc.mk <| ⟨∅, fun _ => Or.inr rfl⟩⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk' (f : ∀ i, β i) (s) : ⇑(⟨f, s⟩ : Π₀ i, β i) = f := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_mk' DFinsupp.coe_mk'
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_zero DFinsupp.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply (i : ι) : (0 : Π₀ i, β i) i = 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zero_apply DFinsupp.zero_apply
/-- The composition of `f : β₁ → β₂` and `g : Π₀ i, β₁ i` is
`mapRange f hf g : Π₀ i, β₂ i`, well defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled:
* `DFinsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `DFinsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `dfinsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `dfinsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (x : Π₀ i, β₁ i) : Π₀ i, β₂ i :=
⟨fun i => f i (x i),
x.support'.map fun s => ⟨s.1, fun i => (s.2 i).imp_right fun h : x i = 0 => by
rw [← hf i, ← h]⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.map_range DFinsupp.mapRange
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (i : ι) :
mapRange f hf g i = f i (g i) :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_apply DFinsupp.mapRange_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (h : ∀ i, id (0 : β₁ i) = 0 := fun i => rfl) (g : Π₀ i : ι, β₁ i) :
mapRange (fun i => (id : β₁ i → β₁ i)) h g = g := by
ext
rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_id DFinsupp.mapRange_id
theorem mapRange_comp (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (f₂ : ∀ i, β i → β₁ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : ∀ i, f₂ i 0 = 0) (h : ∀ i, (f i ∘ f₂ i) 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i : ι, β i) :
mapRange (fun i => f i ∘ f₂ i) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) := by
ext
simp only [mapRange_apply]; rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_comp DFinsupp.mapRange_comp
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) :
mapRange f hf (0 : Π₀ i, β₁ i) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [mapRange_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, hf]
#align dfinsupp.map_range_zero DFinsupp.mapRange_zero
/-- Let `f i` be a binary operation `β₁ i → β₂ i → β i` such that `f i 0 0 = 0`.
Then `zipWith f hf` is a binary operation `Π₀ i, β₁ i → Π₀ i, β₂ i → Π₀ i, β i`. -/
def zipWith (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0) (x : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (y : Π₀ i, β₂ i) :
Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => f i (x i) (y i), by
refine x.support'.bind fun xs => ?_
refine y.support'.map fun ys => ?_
refine ⟨xs + ys, fun i => ?_⟩
obtain h1 | (h1 : x i = 0) := xs.prop i
· left
rw [Multiset.mem_add]
left
exact h1
obtain h2 | (h2 : y i = 0) := ys.prop i
· left
rw [Multiset.mem_add]
right
exact h2
right; rw [← hf, ← h1, ← h2]⟩
#align dfinsupp.zip_with DFinsupp.zipWith
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i)
(g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) (i : ι) : zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ i = f i (g₁ i) (g₂ i) :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zip_with_apply DFinsupp.zipWith_apply
section Piecewise
variable (x y : Π₀ i, β i) (s : Set ι) [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ s)]
/-- `x.piecewise y s` is the finitely supported function equal to `x` on the set `s`,
and to `y` on its complement. -/
def piecewise : Π₀ i, β i :=
zipWith (fun i x y => if i ∈ s then x else y) (fun _ => ite_self 0) x y
#align dfinsupp.piecewise DFinsupp.piecewise
theorem piecewise_apply (i : ι) : x.piecewise y s i = if i ∈ s then x i else y i :=
zipWith_apply _ _ x y i
#align dfinsupp.piecewise_apply DFinsupp.piecewise_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_piecewise : ⇑(x.piecewise y s) = s.piecewise x y := by
ext
apply piecewise_apply
#align dfinsupp.coe_piecewise DFinsupp.coe_piecewise
end Piecewise
end Basic
section Algebra
instance [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] : Add (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨zipWith (fun _ => (· + ·)) fun _ => add_zero 0⟩
theorem add_apply [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) :
(g₁ + g₂) i = g₁ i + g₂ i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.add_apply DFinsupp.add_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(g₁ + g₂) = g₁ + g₂ :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_add DFinsupp.coe_add
instance addZeroClass [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] : AddZeroClass (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] [∀ i, IsLeftCancelAdd (β i)] :
IsLeftCancelAdd (Π₀ i, β i) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] [∀ i, IsRightCancelAdd (β i)] :
IsRightCancelAdd (Π₀ i, β i) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] [∀ i, IsCancelAdd (β i)] :
IsCancelAdd (Π₀ i, β i) where
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance doesn't apply as `ℕ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance hasNatScalar [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] : SMul ℕ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun c v => v.mapRange (fun _ => (c • ·)) fun _ => nsmul_zero _⟩
#align dfinsupp.has_nat_scalar DFinsupp.hasNatScalar
theorem nsmul_apply [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] (b : ℕ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (b • v) i = b • v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.nsmul_apply DFinsupp.nsmul_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nsmul [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] (b : ℕ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(b • v) = b • ⇑v :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_nsmul DFinsupp.coe_nsmul
instance [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] : AddMonoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _
/-- Coercion from a `DFinsupp` to a pi type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeFnAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ ∀ i, β i where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align dfinsupp.coe_fn_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.coeFnAddMonoidHom
/-- Evaluation at a point is an `AddMonoidHom`. This is the finitely-supported version of
`Pi.evalAddMonoidHom`. -/
def evalAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (i : ι) : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ β i :=
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom β i).comp coeFnAddMonoidHom
#align dfinsupp.eval_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.evalAddMonoidHom
instance addCommMonoid [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : AddCommMonoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_sum {α} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] (s : Finset α) (g : α → Π₀ i, β i) :
⇑(∑ a ∈ s, g a) = ∑ a ∈ s, ⇑(g a) :=
map_sum coeFnAddMonoidHom g s
#align dfinsupp.coe_finset_sum DFinsupp.coe_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem finset_sum_apply {α} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] (s : Finset α) (g : α → Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) :
(∑ a ∈ s, g a) i = ∑ a ∈ s, g a i :=
map_sum (evalAddMonoidHom i) g s
#align dfinsupp.finset_sum_apply DFinsupp.finset_sum_apply
instance [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : Neg (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun f => f.mapRange (fun _ => Neg.neg) fun _ => neg_zero⟩
theorem neg_apply [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (-g) i = -g i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.neg_apply DFinsupp.neg_apply
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(-g) = -g := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_neg DFinsupp.coe_neg
instance [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : Sub (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨zipWith (fun _ => Sub.sub) fun _ => sub_zero 0⟩
theorem sub_apply [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (g₁ - g₂) i = g₁ i - g₂ i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.sub_apply DFinsupp.sub_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(g₁ - g₂) = g₁ - g₂ :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_sub DFinsupp.coe_sub
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance doesn't apply as `ℤ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance hasIntScalar [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : SMul ℤ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun c v => v.mapRange (fun _ => (c • ·)) fun _ => zsmul_zero _⟩
#align dfinsupp.has_int_scalar DFinsupp.hasIntScalar
theorem zsmul_apply [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (b : ℤ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (b • v) i = b • v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zsmul_apply DFinsupp.zsmul_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zsmul [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (b : ℤ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(b • v) = b • ⇑v :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_zsmul DFinsupp.coe_zsmul
instance [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] : AddGroup (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addGroup _ coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _)
fun _ _ => coe_zsmul _ _
instance addCommGroup [∀ i, AddCommGroup (β i)] : AddCommGroup (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup _ coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_nsmul _ _)
fun _ _ => coe_zsmul _ _
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a semiring action from an action on each
coordinate. -/
instance [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] : SMul γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨fun c v => v.mapRange (fun _ => (c • ·)) fun _ => smul_zero _⟩
theorem smul_apply [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] (b : γ)
(v : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (b • v) i = b • v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.smul_apply DFinsupp.smul_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] (b : γ)
(v : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(b • v) = b • ⇑v :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_smul DFinsupp.coe_smul
instance smulCommClass {δ : Type*} [Monoid γ] [Monoid δ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)]
[∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction δ (β i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass γ δ (β i)] :
SMulCommClass γ δ (Π₀ i, β i) where
smul_comm r s m := ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, smul_comm r s (m i)]
instance isScalarTower {δ : Type*} [Monoid γ] [Monoid δ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)]
[∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction δ (β i)] [SMul γ δ]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower γ δ (β i)] : IsScalarTower γ δ (Π₀ i, β i) where
smul_assoc r s m := ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, smul_assoc r s (m i)]
instance isCentralScalar [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)]
[∀ i, DistribMulAction γᵐᵒᵖ (β i)] [∀ i, IsCentralScalar γ (β i)] :
IsCentralScalar γ (Π₀ i, β i) where
op_smul_eq_smul r m := ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, op_smul_eq_smul r (m i)]
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a `DistribMulAction` structure from such a
structure on each coordinate. -/
instance distribMulAction [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] :
DistribMulAction γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
Function.Injective.distribMulAction coeFnAddMonoidHom DFunLike.coe_injective coe_smul
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a module structure from such a structure on
each coordinate. -/
instance module [Semiring γ] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, Module γ (β i)] :
Module γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DistribMulAction γ (Π₀ i, β i)) with
zero_smul := fun c => ext fun i => by simp only [smul_apply, zero_smul, zero_apply]
add_smul := fun c x y => ext fun i => by simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, add_smul] }
#align dfinsupp.module DFinsupp.module
end Algebra
section FilterAndSubtypeDomain
/-- `Filter p f` is the function which is `f i` if `p i` is true and 0 otherwise. -/
def filter [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => if p i then x i else 0,
x.support'.map fun xs =>
⟨xs.1, fun i => (xs.prop i).imp_right fun H : x i = 0 => by simp only [H, ite_self]⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.filter DFinsupp.filter
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.filter p i = if p i then f i else 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.filter_apply DFinsupp.filter_apply
theorem filter_apply_pos [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) {i : ι}
(h : p i) : f.filter p i = f i := by simp only [filter_apply, if_pos h]
#align dfinsupp.filter_apply_pos DFinsupp.filter_apply_pos
theorem filter_apply_neg [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) {i : ι}
(h : ¬p i) : f.filter p i = 0 := by simp only [filter_apply, if_neg h]
#align dfinsupp.filter_apply_neg DFinsupp.filter_apply_neg
theorem filter_pos_add_filter_neg [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (f : Π₀ i, β i) (p : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] : (f.filter p + f.filter fun i => ¬p i) = f :=
ext fun i => by
simp only [add_apply, filter_apply]; split_ifs <;> simp only [add_zero, zero_add]
#align dfinsupp.filter_pos_add_filter_neg DFinsupp.filter_pos_add_filter_neg
@[simp]
theorem filter_zero [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(0 : Π₀ i, β i).filter p = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align dfinsupp.filter_zero DFinsupp.filter_zero
@[simp]
theorem filter_add [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f g : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f + g).filter p = f.filter p + g.filter p := by
ext
simp [ite_add_zero]
#align dfinsupp.filter_add DFinsupp.filter_add
@[simp]
theorem filter_smul [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)] (p : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] (r : γ) (f : Π₀ i, β i) : (r • f).filter p = r • f.filter p := by
ext
simp [smul_apply, smul_ite]
#align dfinsupp.filter_smul DFinsupp.filter_smul
variable (γ β)
/-- `DFinsupp.filter` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def filterAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(Π₀ i, β i) →+ Π₀ i, β i where
toFun := filter p
map_zero' := filter_zero p
map_add' := filter_add p
#align dfinsupp.filter_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.filterAddMonoidHom
#align dfinsupp.filter_add_monoid_hom_apply DFinsupp.filterAddMonoidHom_apply
/-- `DFinsupp.filter` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def filterLinearMap [Semiring γ] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, Module γ (β i)] (p : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] : (Π₀ i, β i) →ₗ[γ] Π₀ i, β i where
toFun := filter p
map_add' := filter_add p
map_smul' := filter_smul p
#align dfinsupp.filter_linear_map DFinsupp.filterLinearMap
#align dfinsupp.filter_linear_map_apply DFinsupp.filterLinearMap_apply
variable {γ β}
@[simp]
theorem filter_neg [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(-f).filter p = -f.filter p :=
(filterAddMonoidHom β p).map_neg f
#align dfinsupp.filter_neg DFinsupp.filter_neg
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f g : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f - g).filter p = f.filter p - g.filter p :=
(filterAddMonoidHom β p).map_sub f g
#align dfinsupp.filter_sub DFinsupp.filter_sub
/-- `subtypeDomain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function
`f` to the subtype `p`. -/
def subtypeDomain [∀ i, Zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : Π₀ i, β i) :
Π₀ i : Subtype p, β i :=
⟨fun i => x (i : ι),
x.support'.map fun xs =>
⟨(Multiset.filter p xs.1).attach.map fun j => ⟨j.1, (Multiset.mem_filter.1 j.2).2⟩, fun i =>
(xs.prop i).imp_left fun H =>
Multiset.mem_map.2
⟨⟨i, Multiset.mem_filter.2 ⟨H, i.2⟩⟩, Multiset.mem_attach _ _, Subtype.eta _ _⟩⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain DFinsupp.subtypeDomain
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_zero [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
subtypeDomain p (0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_zero DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_zero
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_apply [∀ i, Zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {i : Subtype p}
{v : Π₀ i, β i} : (subtypeDomain p v) i = v i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_apply DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_apply
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_add [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
(v v' : Π₀ i, β i) : (v + v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p + v'.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_add DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_smul [Monoid γ] [∀ i, AddMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DistribMulAction γ (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (r : γ) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(r • f).subtypeDomain p = r • f.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_smul DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_smul
variable (γ β)
/-- `subtypeDomain` but as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(Π₀ i : ι, β i) →+ Π₀ i : Subtype p, β i where
toFun := subtypeDomain p
map_zero' := subtypeDomain_zero
map_add' := subtypeDomain_add
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_add_monoid_hom DFinsupp.subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_add_monoid_hom_apply DFinsupp.subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom_apply
/-- `DFinsupp.subtypeDomain` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeDomainLinearMap [Semiring γ] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, Module γ (β i)]
(p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : (Π₀ i, β i) →ₗ[γ] Π₀ i : Subtype p, β i where
toFun := subtypeDomain p
map_add' := subtypeDomain_add
map_smul' := subtypeDomain_smul
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_linear_map DFinsupp.subtypeDomainLinearMap
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_linear_map_apply DFinsupp.subtypeDomainLinearMap_apply
variable {γ β}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_neg [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {v : Π₀ i, β i} :
(-v).subtypeDomain p = -v.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_neg DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_neg
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_sub [∀ i, AddGroup (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
{v v' : Π₀ i, β i} : (v - v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p - v'.subtypeDomain p :=
DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
#align dfinsupp.subtype_domain_sub DFinsupp.subtypeDomain_sub
end FilterAndSubtypeDomain
variable [DecidableEq ι]
section Basic
variable [∀ i, Zero (β i)]
theorem finite_support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : Set.Finite { i | f i ≠ 0 } :=
Trunc.induction_on f.support' fun xs ↦
xs.1.finite_toSet.subset fun i H ↦ ((xs.prop i).resolve_right H)
#align dfinsupp.finite_support DFinsupp.finite_support
/-- Create an element of `Π₀ i, β i` from a finset `s` and a function `x`
defined on this `Finset`. -/
def mk (s : Finset ι) (x : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β (i : ι)) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0,
Trunc.mk ⟨s.1, fun i => if H : i ∈ s then Or.inl H else Or.inr <| dif_neg H⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.mk DFinsupp.mk
variable {s : Finset ι} {x : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β i} {i : ι}
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.mk_apply DFinsupp.mk_apply
theorem mk_of_mem (hi : i ∈ s) : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = x ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
dif_pos hi
#align dfinsupp.mk_of_mem DFinsupp.mk_of_mem
theorem mk_of_not_mem (hi : i ∉ s) : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = 0 :=
dif_neg hi
#align dfinsupp.mk_of_not_mem DFinsupp.mk_of_not_mem
theorem mk_injective (s : Finset ι) : Function.Injective (@mk ι β _ _ s) := by
intro x y H
ext i
have h1 : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = (mk s y : ∀ i, β i) i := by rw [H]
obtain ⟨i, hi : i ∈ s⟩ := i
dsimp only [mk_apply, Subtype.coe_mk] at h1
simpa only [dif_pos hi] using h1
#align dfinsupp.mk_injective DFinsupp.mk_injective
instance unique [∀ i, Subsingleton (β i)] : Unique (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
#align dfinsupp.unique DFinsupp.unique
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : Unique (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
#align dfinsupp.unique_of_is_empty DFinsupp.uniqueOfIsEmpty
/-- Given `Fintype ι`, `equivFunOnFintype` is the `Equiv` between `Π₀ i, β i` and `Π i, β i`.
(All dependent functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps apply]
def equivFunOnFintype [Fintype ι] : (Π₀ i, β i) ≃ ∀ i, β i where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := ⟨f, Trunc.mk ⟨Finset.univ.1, fun _ => Or.inl <| Finset.mem_univ_val _⟩⟩
left_inv _ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype_apply DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_apply
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFintype_symm_coe [Fintype ι] (f : Π₀ i, β i) : equivFunOnFintype.symm f = f :=
Equiv.symm_apply_apply _ _
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype_symm_coe DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_symm_coe
/-- The function `single i b : Π₀ i, β i` sends `i` to `b`
and all other points to `0`. -/
def single (i : ι) (b : β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨Pi.single i b,
Trunc.mk ⟨{i}, fun j => (Decidable.eq_or_ne j i).imp (by simp) fun h => Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.single DFinsupp.single
theorem single_eq_pi_single {i b} : ⇑(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) = Pi.single i b :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_pi_single DFinsupp.single_eq_pi_single
@[simp]
theorem single_apply {i i' b} :
(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = if h : i = i' then Eq.recOn h b else 0 := by
rw [single_eq_pi_single, Pi.single, Function.update]
simp [@eq_comm _ i i']
#align dfinsupp.single_apply DFinsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_zero (i) : (single i 0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| Pi.single_zero _
#align dfinsupp.single_zero DFinsupp.single_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem single_eq_same {i b} : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i = b := by
simp only [single_apply, dite_eq_ite, ite_true]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_same DFinsupp.single_eq_same
theorem single_eq_of_ne {i i' b} (h : i ≠ i') : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = 0 := by
simp only [single_apply, dif_neg h]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_of_ne DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne
theorem single_injective {i} : Function.Injective (single i : β i → Π₀ i, β i) := fun _ _ H =>
Pi.single_injective β i <| DFunLike.coe_injective.eq_iff.mpr H
#align dfinsupp.single_injective DFinsupp.single_injective
/-- Like `Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff`, but with a `HEq` due to dependent types -/
theorem single_eq_single_iff (i j : ι) (xi : β i) (xj : β j) :
DFinsupp.single i xi = DFinsupp.single j xj ↔ i = j ∧ HEq xi xj ∨ xi = 0 ∧ xj = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst hij
exact Or.inl ⟨rfl, heq_of_eq (DFinsupp.single_injective h)⟩
· have h_coe : ⇑(DFinsupp.single i xi) = DFinsupp.single j xj := congr_arg (⇑) h
have hci := congr_fun h_coe i
have hcj := congr_fun h_coe j
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_same] at hci hcj
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne (Ne.symm hij)] at hci
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne hij] at hcj
exact Or.inr ⟨hci, hcj.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, hxi⟩ | ⟨hi, hj⟩)
· rw [eq_of_heq hxi]
· rw [hi, hj, DFinsupp.single_zero, DFinsupp.single_zero]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_single_iff DFinsupp.single_eq_single_iff
/-- `DFinsupp.single a b` is injective in `a`. For the statement that it is injective in `b`, see
`DFinsupp.single_injective` -/
theorem single_left_injective {b : ∀ i : ι, β i} (h : ∀ i, b i ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (fun i => single i (b i) : ι → Π₀ i, β i) := fun _ _ H =>
(((single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _).mp H).resolve_right fun hb => h _ hb.1).left
#align dfinsupp.single_left_injective DFinsupp.single_left_injective
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero {i : ι} {xi : β i} : single i xi = 0 ↔ xi = 0 := by
rw [← single_zero i, single_eq_single_iff]
simp
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_zero DFinsupp.single_eq_zero
theorem filter_single (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (i : ι) (x : β i) :
(single i x).filter p = if p i then single i x else 0 := by
ext j
have := apply_ite (fun x : Π₀ i, β i => x j) (p i) (single i x) 0
dsimp at this
rw [filter_apply, this]
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rfl
· rw [single_eq_of_ne hij, ite_self, ite_self]
#align dfinsupp.filter_single DFinsupp.filter_single
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_pos {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (i : ι) (x : β i) (h : p i) :
(single i x).filter p = single i x := by rw [filter_single, if_pos h]
#align dfinsupp.filter_single_pos DFinsupp.filter_single_pos
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_neg {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (i : ι) (x : β i) (h : ¬p i) :
(single i x).filter p = 0 := by rw [filter_single, if_neg h]
#align dfinsupp.filter_single_neg DFinsupp.filter_single_neg
/-- Equality of sigma types is sufficient (but not necessary) to show equality of `DFinsupp`s. -/
theorem single_eq_of_sigma_eq {i j} {xi : β i} {xj : β j} (h : (⟨i, xi⟩ : Sigma β) = ⟨j, xj⟩) :
DFinsupp.single i xi = DFinsupp.single j xj := by
cases h
rfl
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_of_sigma_eq DFinsupp.single_eq_of_sigma_eq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/Basic.lean | 709 | 713 | theorem equivFunOnFintype_single [Fintype ι] (i : ι) (m : β i) :
(@DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype ι β _ _) (DFinsupp.single i m) = Pi.single i m := by |
ext x
dsimp [Pi.single, Function.update]
simp [DFinsupp.single_eq_pi_single, @eq_comm _ i]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ddec54a71a0dd025c05445d467f1a2b7d586a3ba"
/-!
# Smooth manifolds (possibly with boundary or corners)
A smooth manifold is a manifold modelled on a normed vector space, or a subset like a
half-space (to get manifolds with boundaries) for which the changes of coordinates are smooth maps.
We define a model with corners as a map `I : H → E` embedding nicely the topological space `H` in
the vector space `E` (or more precisely as a structure containing all the relevant properties).
Given such a model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of local
homeomorphisms of `H` which are smooth when read in `E` (for any regularity `n : ℕ∞`).
With this groupoid at hand and the general machinery of charted spaces, we thus get the notion
of `C^n` manifold with respect to any model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`. We also introduce a
specific type class for `C^∞` manifolds as these are the most commonly used.
Some texts assume manifolds to be Hausdorff and secound countable. We (in mathlib) assume neither,
but add these assumptions later as needed. (Quite a few results still do not require them.)
## Main definitions
* `ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H` :
a structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space E over the field `𝕜`. This is all that is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
* `modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E` :
trivial model with corners structure on the space `E` embedded in itself by the identity.
* `contDiffGroupoid n I` :
when `I` is a model with corners on `(𝕜, E, H)`, this is the groupoid of partial homeos of `H`
which are of class `C^n` over the normed field `𝕜`, when read in `E`.
* `SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M` :
a type class saying that the charted space `M`, modelled on the space `H`, has `C^∞` changes of
coordinates with respect to the model with corners `I` on `(𝕜, E, H)`. This type class is just
a shortcut for `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)`.
* `extChartAt I x`:
in a smooth manifold with corners with the model `I` on `(E, H)`, the charts take values in `H`,
but often we may want to use their `E`-valued version, obtained by composing the charts with `I`.
Since the target is in general not open, we can not register them as partial homeomorphisms, but
we register them as `PartialEquiv`s.
`extChartAt I x` is the canonical such partial equiv around `x`.
As specific examples of models with corners, we define (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real`)
* `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` for the model space used to define
`n`-dimensional real manifolds without boundary (with notation `𝓡 n` in the locale `Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanHalfSpace n)` for the model space
used to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary (with notation `𝓡∂ n` in the locale
`Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanQuadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
With these definitions at hand, to invoke an `n`-dimensional real manifold without boundary,
one could use
`variable {n : ℕ} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M]`.
However, this is not the recommended way: a theorem proved using this assumption would not apply
for instance to the tangent space of such a manifold, which is modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` and not on `EuclideanSpace (Fin (2 * n))`!
In the same way, it would not apply to product manifolds, modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin m))`.
The right invocation does not focus on one specific construction, but on all constructions sharing
the right properties, like
`variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E E} [I.Boundaryless]
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace E M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]`
Here, `I.Boundaryless` is a typeclass property ensuring that there is no boundary (this is for
instance the case for `modelWithCornersSelf`, or products of these). Note that one could consider
as a natural assumption to only use the trivial model with corners `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ E`,
but again in product manifolds the natural model with corners will not be this one but the product
one (and they are not defeq as `(fun p : E × F ↦ (p.1, p.2))` is not defeq to the identity).
So, it is important to use the above incantation to maximize the applicability of theorems.
## Implementation notes
We want to talk about manifolds modelled on a vector space, but also on manifolds with
boundary, modelled on a half space (or even manifolds with corners). For the latter examples,
we still want to define smooth functions, tangent bundles, and so on. As smooth functions are
well defined on vector spaces or subsets of these, one could take for model space a subtype of a
vector space. With the drawback that the whole vector space itself (which is the most basic
example) is not directly a subtype of itself: the inclusion of `univ : Set E` in `Set E` would
show up in the definition, instead of `id`.
A good abstraction covering both cases it to have a vector
space `E` (with basic example the Euclidean space), a model space `H` (with basic example the upper
half space), and an embedding of `H` into `E` (which can be the identity for `H = E`, or
`Subtype.val` for manifolds with corners). We say that the pair `(E, H)` with their embedding is a
model with corners, and we encompass all the relevant properties (in particular the fact that the
image of `H` in `E` should have unique differentials) in the definition of `ModelWithCorners`.
We concentrate on `C^∞` manifolds: all the definitions work equally well for `C^n` manifolds, but
later on it is a pain to carry all over the smoothness parameter, especially when one wants to deal
with `C^k` functions as there would be additional conditions `k ≤ n` everywhere. Since one deals
almost all the time with `C^∞` (or analytic) manifolds, this seems to be a reasonable choice that
one could revisit later if needed. `C^k` manifolds are still available, but they should be called
using `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid k I)` where `I` is the model with corners.
I have considered using the model with corners `I` as a typeclass argument, possibly `outParam`, to
get lighter notations later on, but it did not turn out right, as on `E × F` there are two natural
model with corners, the trivial (identity) one, and the product one, and they are not defeq and one
needs to indicate to Lean which one we want to use.
This means that when talking on objects on manifolds one will most often need to specify the model
with corners one is using. For instance, the tangent bundle will be `TangentBundle I M` and the
derivative will be `mfderiv I I' f`, instead of the more natural notations `TangentBundle 𝕜 M` and
`mfderiv 𝕜 f` (the field has to be explicit anyway, as some manifolds could be considered both as
real and complex manifolds).
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w u' v' w'
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Manifold Filter Topology
/-- The extended natural number `∞` -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
/-! ### Models with corners. -/
/-- A structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space `E` over the field `𝕜`. This is all what is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
-/
@[ext] -- Porting note(#5171): was nolint has_nonempty_instance
structure ModelWithCorners (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] extends
PartialEquiv H E where
source_eq : source = univ
unique_diff' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 toPartialEquiv.target
continuous_toFun : Continuous toFun := by continuity
continuous_invFun : Continuous invFun := by continuity
#align model_with_corners ModelWithCorners
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] ModelWithCorners.source_eq
/-- A vector space is a model with corners. -/
def modelWithCornersSelf (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.refl E
source_eq := rfl
unique_diff' := uniqueDiffOn_univ
continuous_toFun := continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id
#align model_with_corners_self modelWithCornersSelf
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ", " E ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E
/-- A normed field is a model with corners. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 𝕜
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-- Coercion of a model with corners to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is actually
`e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to
switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' (e : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) fun _ => H → E := ⟨toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse to a model with corners, only registered as a `PartialEquiv`. -/
protected def symm : PartialEquiv E H :=
I.toPartialEquiv.symm
#align model_with_corners.symm ModelWithCorners.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E :=
I
#align model_with_corners.simps.apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : E → H :=
I.symm
#align model_with_corners.simps.symm_apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections ModelWithCorners (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Register a few lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts expressions in normal form
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe : (I.toPartialEquiv : H → E) = I :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
((ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E) = (e : H → E) :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_coe ModelWithCorners.mk_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe_symm : (I.toPartialEquiv.symm : E → H) = I.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe_symm ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_symm (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
(ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_symm ModelWithCorners.mk_symm
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous I :=
I.continuous_toFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous ModelWithCorners.continuous
protected theorem continuousAt {x} : ContinuousAt I x :=
I.continuous.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at ModelWithCorners.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I s x :=
I.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous I.symm :=
I.continuous_invFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous_symm ModelWithCorners.continuous_symm
theorem continuousAt_symm {x} : ContinuousAt I.symm x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousAt_symm
theorem continuousWithinAt_symm {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I.symm s x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_symm {s} : ContinuousOn I.symm s :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousOn
#align model_with_corners.continuous_on_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousOn_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem target_eq : I.target = range (I : H → E) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← I.source_eq]
exact I.image_source_eq_target.symm
#align model_with_corners.target_eq ModelWithCorners.target_eq
protected theorem unique_diff : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (range I) :=
I.target_eq ▸ I.unique_diff'
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff ModelWithCorners.unique_diff
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem left_inv (x : H) : I.symm (I x) = x := by refine I.left_inv' ?_; simp
#align model_with_corners.left_inv ModelWithCorners.left_inv
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse I.symm I :=
I.left_inv
#align model_with_corners.left_inverse ModelWithCorners.leftInverse
theorem injective : Injective I :=
I.leftInverse.injective
#align model_with_corners.injective ModelWithCorners.injective
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_comp_self : I.symm ∘ I = id :=
I.leftInverse.comp_eq_id
#align model_with_corners.symm_comp_self ModelWithCorners.symm_comp_self
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn I.symm I (range I) :=
I.leftInverse.rightInvOn_range
#align model_with_corners.right_inv_on ModelWithCorners.rightInvOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem right_inv {x : E} (hx : x ∈ range I) : I (I.symm x) = x :=
I.rightInvOn hx
#align model_with_corners.right_inv ModelWithCorners.right_inv
theorem preimage_image (s : Set H) : I ⁻¹' (I '' s) = s :=
I.injective.preimage_image s
#align model_with_corners.preimage_image ModelWithCorners.preimage_image
protected theorem image_eq (s : Set H) : I '' s = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I := by
refine (I.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage ?_).trans ?_
· rw [I.source_eq]; exact subset_univ _
· rw [inter_comm, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm]
#align model_with_corners.image_eq ModelWithCorners.image_eq
protected theorem closedEmbedding : ClosedEmbedding I :=
I.leftInverse.closedEmbedding I.continuous_symm I.continuous
#align model_with_corners.closed_embedding ModelWithCorners.closedEmbedding
theorem isClosed_range : IsClosed (range I) :=
I.closedEmbedding.isClosed_range
#align model_with_corners.closed_range ModelWithCorners.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")] alias closed_range := isClosed_range
theorem map_nhds_eq (x : H) : map I (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhds_eq x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (s : Set H) (x : H) : map I (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[I '' s] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq s x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_within_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhdsWithin_eq
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin {x : H} {s : Set H} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : I '' s ∈ 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align model_with_corners.image_mem_nhds_within ModelWithCorners.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_image {x : H} {s : Set H} : map I.symm (𝓝[I '' s] I x) = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [← I.map_nhdsWithin_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_image ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_range (x : H) : map I.symm (𝓝[range I] I x) = 𝓝 x := by
rw [← I.map_nhds_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_range ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range
theorem unique_diff_preimage {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact I.unique_diff.inter (hs.preimage I.continuous_invFun)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage
theorem unique_diff_preimage_source {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {e : PartialHomeomorph H β} :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ range I) :=
I.unique_diff_preimage e.open_source
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage_source ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage_source
theorem unique_diff_at_image {x : H} : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (range I) (I x) :=
I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_at_image ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_at_image
theorem symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : H → X} {s : Set H}
{x : H} :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.comp I.continuousWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
simp_rw [preimage_inter, preimage_preimage, I.left_inv, preimage_id', preimage_range,
inter_univ] at this
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, I.symm_comp_self] at this
· rw [← I.left_inv x] at h; exact h.comp I.continuousWithinAt_symm inter_subset_left
#align model_with_corners.symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff ModelWithCorners.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
protected theorem locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
LocallyCompactSpace H := by
have : ∀ x : H, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 (I x) ∧ IsCompact s)
fun s => I.symm '' (s ∩ range I) := fun x ↦ by
rw [← I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (I x)).inf_principal _).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨-, hsc⟩
exact (hsc.inter_right I.isClosed_range).image I.continuous_symm
#align model_with_corners.locally_compact ModelWithCorners.locallyCompactSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem secondCountableTopology [SecondCountableTopology E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
SecondCountableTopology H :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
#align model_with_corners.second_countable_topology ModelWithCorners.secondCountableTopology
end ModelWithCorners
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- In the trivial model with corners, the associated `PartialEquiv` is the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv : 𝓘(𝕜, E).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl E :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_local_equiv modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe : (𝓘(𝕜, E) : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe modelWithCornersSelf_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm : (𝓘(𝕜, E).symm : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe_symm modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm
end
end
section ModelWithCornersProd
/-- Given two model_with_corners `I` on `(E, H)` and `I'` on `(E', H')`, we define the model with
corners `I.prod I'` on `(E × E', ModelProd H H')`. This appears in particular for the manifold
structure on the tangent bundle to a manifold modelled on `(E, H)`: it will be modelled on
`(E × E, H × E)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about `ModelProd H H'`
vs `H × H'`. -/
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def ModelWithCorners.prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E') (ModelProd H H') :=
{ I.toPartialEquiv.prod I'.toPartialEquiv with
toFun := fun x => (I x.1, I' x.2)
invFun := fun x => (I.symm x.1, I'.symm x.2)
source := { x | x.1 ∈ I.source ∧ x.2 ∈ I'.source }
source_eq := by simp only [setOf_true, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := I.unique_diff'.prod I'.unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := I.continuous_toFun.prod_map I'.continuous_toFun
continuous_invFun := I.continuous_invFun.prod_map I'.continuous_invFun }
#align model_with_corners.prod ModelWithCorners.prod
/-- Given a finite family of `ModelWithCorners` `I i` on `(E i, H i)`, we define the model with
corners `pi I` on `(Π i, E i, ModelPi H)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about
`ModelPi H`. -/
def ModelWithCorners.pi {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
{E : ι → Type w} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {H : ι → Type u'}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (I : ∀ i, ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E i) (H i)) :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) (ModelPi H) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (I i).toPartialEquiv
source_eq := by simp only [pi_univ, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := UniqueDiffOn.pi ι E _ _ fun i _ => (I i).unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous.comp (continuous_apply i)
continuous_invFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous_symm.comp (continuous_apply i)
#align model_with_corners.pi ModelWithCorners.pi
/-- Special case of product model with corners, which is trivial on the second factor. This shows up
as the model to tangent bundles. -/
abbrev ModelWithCorners.tangent {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E) (ModelProd H E) :=
I.prod 𝓘(𝕜, E)
#align model_with_corners.tangent ModelWithCorners.tangent
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F']
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H}
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv :
(I.prod J).toPartialEquiv = I.toPartialEquiv.prod J.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_to_local_equiv modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
(I.prod I' : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I I' :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe modelWithCorners_prod_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
((I.prod I').symm : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I.symm I'.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe_symm modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_prod : 𝓘(𝕜, E × F) = 𝓘(𝕜, E).prod 𝓘(𝕜, F) := by ext1 <;> simp
#align model_with_corners_self_prod modelWithCornersSelf_prod
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_prod : range (I.prod J) = range I ×ˢ range J := by
simp_rw [← ModelWithCorners.target_eq]; rfl
#align model_with_corners.range_prod ModelWithCorners.range_prod
end ModelWithCornersProd
section Boundaryless
/-- Property ensuring that the model with corners `I` defines manifolds without boundary. This
differs from the more general `BoundarylessManifold`, which requires every point on the manifold
to be an interior point. -/
class ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : Prop where
range_eq_univ : range I = univ
#align model_with_corners.boundaryless ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] :
range I = univ := ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ
/-- If `I` is a `ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless` model, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps (config := {simpRhs := true})]
def ModelWithCorners.toHomeomorph {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] : H ≃ₜ E where
__ := I
left_inv := I.left_inv
right_inv _ := I.right_inv <| I.range_eq_univ.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- The trivial model with corners has no boundary -/
instance modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E).Boundaryless :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align model_with_corners_self_boundaryless modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless
/-- If two model with corners are boundaryless, their product also is -/
instance ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H')
[I'.Boundaryless] : (I.prod I').Boundaryless := by
constructor
dsimp [ModelWithCorners.prod, ModelProd]
rw [← prod_range_range_eq, ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ,
ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ, univ_prod_univ]
#align model_with_corners.range_eq_univ_prod ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod
end Boundaryless
section contDiffGroupoid
/-! ### Smooth functions on models with corners -/
variable {m n : ℕ∞} {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
variable (n)
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the pregroupoid of `C^n` transformations of `H`
as the maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffPregroupoid : Pregroupoid H where
property f s := ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
comp {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ := by
have : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
simp only [this]
refine hg.comp (hf.mono fun x ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ ↦ ⟨hx1.1, hx2⟩) ?_
rintro x ⟨hx1, _⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx1 ⊢
exact hx1.2
id_mem := by
apply ContDiffOn.congr contDiff_id.contDiffOn
rintro x ⟨_, hx2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hx2 with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy]
simp only [mfld_simps]
locality {f u} _ H := by
apply contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rcases H x hy1 with ⟨v, v_open, xv, hv⟩
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' u ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' v := by
rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc, inter_assoc]
congr 1
rw [inter_comm]
rw [this] at hv
exact ⟨I.symm ⁻¹' v, v_open.preimage I.continuous_symm, by simpa, hv⟩
congr {f g u} _ fg hf := by
apply hf.congr
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rw [fg _ hy1]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of invertible `C^n` transformations
of `H` as the invertible maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (contDiffPregroupoid n I)
#align cont_diff_groupoid contDiffGroupoid
variable {n}
/-- Inclusion of the groupoid of `C^n` local diffeos in the groupoid of `C^m` local diffeos when
`m ≤ n` -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_le (h : m ≤ n) : contDiffGroupoid n I ≤ contDiffGroupoid m I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, contDiffGroupoid]
apply groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le
intro f s hfs
exact ContDiffOn.of_le hfs h
#align cont_diff_groupoid_le contDiffGroupoid_le
/-- The groupoid of `0`-times continuously differentiable maps is just the groupoid of all
partial homeomorphisms -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq : contDiffGroupoid 0 I = continuousGroupoid H := by
apply le_antisymm le_top
intro u _
-- we have to check that every partial homeomorphism belongs to `contDiffGroupoid 0 I`,
-- by unfolding its definition
change u ∈ contDiffGroupoid 0 I
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid, contDiffPregroupoid]
simp only [contDiffOn_zero]
constructor
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.symm.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
#align cont_diff_groupoid_zero_eq contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq
variable (n)
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid]
suffices h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) by
simp [h, contDiffPregroupoid]
have : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n id (univ : Set E) := contDiff_id.contDiffOn
exact this.congr_mono (fun x hx => I.right_inv hx.2) (subset_univ _)
#align of_set_mem_cont_diff_groupoid ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I e.open_target) this
#align symm_trans_mem_cont_diff_groupoid symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid
variable {E' H' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
/-- The product of two smooth partial homeomorphisms is smooth. -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_prod {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'} (he : e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I)
(he' : e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I') : e.prod e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ (I.prod I') := by
cases' he with he he_symm
cases' he' with he' he'_symm
simp only at he he_symm he' he'_symm
constructor <;> simp only [PartialEquiv.prod_source, PartialHomeomorph.prod_toPartialEquiv,
contDiffPregroupoid]
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he he'
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he_symm he'_symm
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
#align cont_diff_groupoid_prod contDiffGroupoid_prod
/-- The `C^n` groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (contDiffGroupoid n I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (contDiffGroupoid n I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I hs)
end contDiffGroupoid
section analyticGroupoid
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of analytic transformations of `H`
as the maps that are analytic and map interior to interior when read in `E` through `I`. We also
explicitly define that they are `C^∞` on the whole domain, since we are only requiring
analyticity on the interior of the domain. -/
def analyticGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) ⊓ Pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := fun f s => AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I)
comp := fun {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ => by
simp only [] at hf hg ⊢
have comp : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
apply And.intro
· simp only [comp, preimage_inter]
refine hg.left.comp (hf.left.mono ?_) ?_
· simp only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_right]
rw [inter_assoc]
simp
· intro x hx
apply And.intro
· rw [mem_preimage, comp_apply, I.left_inv]
exact hx.left.right
· apply hf.right
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨x, ⟨⟨hx.left.left, hx.right⟩, rfl⟩⟩
· simp only [comp]
rw [image_comp]
intro x hx
rw [mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx'⟩
refine hg.right ⟨x', And.intro ?_ hx'.right⟩
apply And.intro
· have hx'1 : x' ∈ ((v.preimage f).preimage (I.symm)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) := by
refine image_subset (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ?_ hx'.left
rw [preimage_inter]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (u.preimage I.symm).inter_subset_right
apply inter_subset_left
rcases hx'1 with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
rw [hx''.right.symm]
simp only [comp_apply, mem_preimage, I.left_inv]
exact hx''.left
· rw [mem_image] at hx'
rcases hx'.left with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
exact hf.right ⟨x'', ⟨⟨hx''.left.left.left, hx''.left.right⟩, hx''.right⟩⟩
id_mem := by
apply And.intro
· simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact AnalyticOn.congr isOpen_interior
(f := (1 : E →L[𝕜] E)) (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
(fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz)).symm)
· intro x hx
simp only [id_comp, comp_apply, preimage_univ, univ_inter, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left)]
exact hy.left
locality := fun {f u} _ h => by
simp only [] at h
simp only [AnalyticOn]
apply And.intro
· intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) (mem_preimage.mp hx.left) with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact hv.right.right.left x ⟨mem_preimage.mpr ⟨hx.left, hv.right.left⟩, hx.right⟩
· apply mapsTo'.mp
simp only [MapsTo]
intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) hx.left with ⟨v, hv⟩
apply hv.right.right.right
rw [mem_image]
have hx' := And.intro hx (mem_preimage.mpr hv.right.left)
rw [← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, ← preimage_inter, inter_comm v u] at hx'
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx', rfl⟩⟩
congr := fun {f g u} hu fg hf => by
simp only [] at hf ⊢
apply And.intro
· refine AnalyticOn.congr (IsOpen.inter (hu.preimage I.continuous_symm) isOpen_interior)
hf.left ?_
intro z hz
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [fg (I.symm z) hz.left]
· intro x hx
apply hf.right
rw [mem_image] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy.left, ?_⟩⟩
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, fg (I.symm y) hy.left.left] at hy
exact hy.right }
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ analyticGroupoid I := by
rw [analyticGroupoid]
refine And.intro (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid ∞ I hs) ?_
apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr
suffices h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I) by
simp only [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_apply, id_comp, PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_toPartialEquiv,
PartialEquiv.ofSet_source, h, comp_apply, mem_range, image_subset_iff, true_and,
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_symm, PartialEquiv.ofSet_target, and_self]
intro x hx
refine mem_preimage.mpr ?_
rw [← I.right_inv (interior_subset hx.right)] at hx
exact hx.right
apply And.intro
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (1 : E →L[𝕜] E) (univ : Set E) := (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
exact (this.mono (subset_univ (s.preimage (I.symm) ∩ interior (range I)))).congr
((hs.preimage I.continuous_symm).inter isOpen_interior)
fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz.right)).symm
· intro x hx
simp only [comp_apply, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left.right)]
exact hy.left.right
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_analyticGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ analyticGroupoid I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I e.open_target) this
/-- The analytic groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (analyticGroupoid I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (analyticGroupoid I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I hs)
/-- The analytic groupoid on a boundaryless charted space modeled on a complete vector space
consists of the partial homeomorphisms which are analytic and have analytic inverse. -/
theorem mem_analyticGroupoid_of_boundaryless [CompleteSpace E] [I.Boundaryless]
(e : PartialHomeomorph H H) :
e ∈ analyticGroupoid I ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.source) ∧
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.target) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro he
have := mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mp he.right
simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ, interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true] at this ⊢
exact this
· intro he
apply And.intro
all_goals apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr; simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ,
interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true, contDiffPregroupoid] at he ⊢
· exact ⟨he.left.contDiffOn, he.right.contDiffOn⟩
· exact he
end analyticGroupoid
section SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/-! ### Smooth manifolds with corners -/
/-- Typeclass defining smooth manifolds with corners with respect to a model with corners, over a
field `𝕜` and with infinite smoothness to simplify typeclass search and statements later on. -/
class SmoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] extends
HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) : Prop
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[gr : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M :=
{ gr with }
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.mk' SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk'
theorem smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
(h : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M →
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (I ∘ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source ∩ range I)) :
SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M where
compatible := by
haveI : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) := hasGroupoid_of_pregroupoid _ (h _ _)
apply StructureGroupoid.compatible
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners_of_cont_diff_on smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn
/-- For any model with corners, the model space is a smooth manifold -/
instance model_space_smooth {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I H :=
{ hasGroupoid_model_space _ _ with }
#align model_space_smooth model_space_smooth
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/- We restate in the namespace `SmoothManifoldWithCorners` some lemmas that hold for general
charted space with a structure groupoid, avoiding the need to specify the groupoid
`contDiffGroupoid ∞ I` explicitly. -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
/-- The maximal atlas of `M` for the smooth manifold with corners structure corresponding to the
model with corners `I`. -/
def maximalAtlas :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I).maximalAtlas M
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.maximalAtlas
variable {M}
theorem subset_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] : atlas H M ⊆ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.subset_maximalAtlas _
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.subset_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.subset_maximalAtlas
theorem chart_mem_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x : M) :
chartAt H x ∈ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.chart_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.chart_mem_maximalAtlas
variable {I}
theorem compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) : e.symm.trans e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas
/-- The product of two smooth manifolds with corners is naturally a smooth manifold with corners. -/
instance prod {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (M' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M'] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners (I.prod I') (M × M') where
compatible := by
rintro f g ⟨f1, hf1, f2, hf2, rfl⟩ ⟨g1, hg1, g2, hg2, rfl⟩
rw [PartialHomeomorph.prod_symm, PartialHomeomorph.prod_trans]
have h1 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I).compatible hf1 hg1
have h2 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I').compatible hf2 hg2
exact contDiffGroupoid_prod h1 h2
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.prod SmoothManifoldWithCorners.prod
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) (h : e.source = Set.univ) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ (e.singletonChartedSpace h) :=
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (id _) <|
e.singleton_hasGroupoid h (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)
#align local_homeomorph.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [Nonempty M] {f : M → H}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ h.singletonChartedSpace :=
(h.toPartialHomeomorph f).singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners I (by simp)
#align open_embedding.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
open TopologicalSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (s : Opens M)
instance : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I s :=
{ s.instHasGroupoid (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) with }
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
section ExtendedCharts
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 E M H E' M' H' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] (f f' : PartialHomeomorph M H)
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
[TopologicalSpace M'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {s t : Set M}
/-!
### Extended charts
In a smooth manifold with corners, the model space is the space `H`. However, we will also
need to use extended charts taking values in the model vector space `E`. These extended charts are
not `PartialHomeomorph` as the target is not open in `E` in general, but we can still register them
as `PartialEquiv`.
-/
namespace PartialHomeomorph
/-- Given a chart `f` on a manifold with corners, `f.extend I` is the extended chart to the model
vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extend : PartialEquiv M E :=
f.toPartialEquiv ≫ I.toPartialEquiv
#align local_homeomorph.extend PartialHomeomorph.extend
theorem extend_coe : ⇑(f.extend I) = I ∘ f :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe
theorem extend_coe_symm : ⇑(f.extend I).symm = f.symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe_symm PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe_symm
theorem extend_source : (f.extend I).source = f.source := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.source_eq, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_source
theorem isOpen_extend_source : IsOpen (f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_source]
exact f.open_source
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_source PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_source
theorem extend_target : (f.extend I).target = I.symm ⁻¹' f.target ∩ range I := by
simp_rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm, inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target PartialHomeomorph.extend_target
theorem extend_target' : (f.extend I).target = I '' f.target := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target'', I.source_eq, univ_inter, I.toPartialEquiv_coe]
lemma isOpen_extend_target [I.Boundaryless] : IsOpen (f.extend I).target := by
rw [extend_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact I.continuous_symm.isOpen_preimage _ f.open_target
theorem mapsTo_extend (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
MapsTo (f.extend I) s ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [mapsTo', extend_coe, extend_coe_symm, preimage_comp, ← I.image_eq, image_comp,
f.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hs]
exact image_subset _ inter_subset_right
#align local_homeomorph.maps_to_extend PartialHomeomorph.mapsTo_extend
theorem extend_left_inv {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) = x :=
(f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_left_inv PartialHomeomorph.extend_left_inv
/-- Variant of `f.extend_left_inv I`, stated in terms of images. -/
lemma extend_left_inv' (ht: t ⊆ f.source) : ((f.extend I).symm ∘ (f.extend I)) '' t = t :=
EqOn.image_eq_self (fun _ hx ↦ f.extend_left_inv I (ht hx))
theorem extend_source_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(isOpen_extend_source f I).mem_nhds <| by rwa [f.extend_source I]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds
theorem extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extend : ContinuousOn (f.extend I) (f.extend I).source := by
refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn ?_
rw [extend_source]
exact f.continuousOn
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend
theorem continuousAt_extend {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : ContinuousAt (f.extend I) x :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).continuousAt <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend
theorem map_extend_nhds {x : M} (hy : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [extend_coe, comp_apply, ← I.map_nhds_eq, ← f.map_nhds_eq, map_map]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhds
theorem map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
rw [f.map_extend_nhds _ hx, I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
(f.extend I).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [← PartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target, ← map_extend_nhds f I hy]
exact image_mem_map (extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x} (hx : x ∈ f.source)
{s : Set M} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : (f.extend I) '' s ∈ 𝓝 ((f.extend I) x) := by
rw [← f.map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless _ hx, Filter.mem_map]
filter_upwards [h] using subset_preimage_image (f.extend I) s
theorem extend_target_subset_range : (f.extend I).target ⊆ range I := by simp only [mfld_simps]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_subset_range PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_subset_range
lemma interior_extend_target_subset_interior_range :
interior (f.extend I).target ⊆ interior (range I) := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq]
exact inter_subset_right
/-- If `y ∈ f.target` and `I y ∈ interior (range I)`,
then `I y` is an interior point of `(I ∘ f).target`. -/
lemma mem_interior_extend_target {y : H} (hy : y ∈ f.target)
(hy' : I y ∈ interior (range I)) : I y ∈ interior (f.extend I).target := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq,
mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨mem_of_eq_of_mem (I.left_inv (y)) hy, hy'⟩
theorem nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
𝓝[(f.extend I).target] f.extend I y = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y :=
(nhdsWithin_mono _ (extend_target_subset_range _ _)).antisymm <|
nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.nhds_within_extend_target_eq PartialHomeomorph.nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm' {x : E} (h : x ∈ (f.extend I).target) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm x :=
(f.continuousAt_symm h.2).comp I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm' PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' f I <| (f.extend I).map_source <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm
theorem continuousOn_extend_symm : ContinuousOn (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I).target := fun _ h =>
(continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend_symm
theorem extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {g : M → X}
{s : Set M} {x : M} :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I x) ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f.symm) (f.symm ⁻¹' s) (f x) := by
rw [← I.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff]; rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage' {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((f.extend I).source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).isOpen_inter_preimage (isOpen_extend_source _ _) hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage' PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (f.source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extend_source f I]; exact isOpen_extend_preimage' f I hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' ((f.extend I).source ∩ s)] f.extend I y := by
set e := f.extend I
calc
map e (𝓝[s] y) = map e (𝓝[e.source ∩ s] y) :=
congr_arg (map e) (nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin f I hy)).symm
_ = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e y :=
((f.extend I).leftInvOn.mono inter_subset_left).map_nhdsWithin_eq
((f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source])
(continuousAt_extend_symm f I hy).continuousWithinAt
(continuousAt_extend f I hy).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within_eq_image PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' s] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ hy, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
rwa [extend_source]
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image f I hy, nhdsWithin_inter, ←
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ hy, ← nhdsWithin_inter, (f.extend I).image_source_inter_eq',
inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝[s] y := by
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin f I hy, map_map, Filter.map_congr, map_id]
exact (f.extend I).leftInvOn.eqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝 y := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ, ← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I hy, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within_range PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range
theorem tendsto_extend_comp_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {g : α → M}
(hg : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ∈ f.source) {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
Tendsto (f.extend I ∘ g) l (𝓝 (f.extend I y)) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 y) := by
refine ⟨fun h u hu ↦ mem_map.2 ?_, (continuousAt_extend _ _ hy).tendsto.comp⟩
have := (f.continuousAt_extend_symm I hy).tendsto.comp h
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy] at this
filter_upwards [hg, mem_map.1 (this hu)] with z hz hzu
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), extend_left_inv _ _ hz, mem_preimage] using hzu
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
theorem continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'} {y : M}
(hy : y ∈ f.source) (hgy : g y ∈ f'.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousWithinAt (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm)
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I y) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s y := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy, f'.tendsto_extend_comp_iff _ _ hgy,
← f.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin I hy, tendsto_map'_iff]
rw [← f.map_extend_nhdsWithin I hy, eventually_map]
filter_upwards [inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (f.open_source.mem_nhds hy)] with z hz
rw [comp_apply, extend_left_inv _ _ hz.2]
exact hmaps hz.1
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
/-- If `s ⊆ f.source` and `g x ∈ f'.source` whenever `x ∈ s`, then `g` is continuous on `s` if and
only if `g` written in charts `f.extend I` and `f'.extend I'` is continuous on `f.extend I '' s`. -/
theorem continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'}
(hs : s ⊆ f.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousOn (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) (f.extend I '' s) ↔ ContinuousOn g s := by
refine forall_mem_image.trans <| forall₂_congr fun x hx ↦ ?_
refine (continuousWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_).trans
(continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff _ _ _ (hs hx) (hmaps hx) hmaps)
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin]
exacts [hs hx, hs hx, hs]
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I h, mem_map] at ht
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
apply (continuousAt_extend_symm f I h).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(f.extend I).left_inv]
rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds
/-- Technical lemma to rewrite suitably the preimage of an intersection under an extended chart, to
bring it into a convenient form to apply derivative lemmas. -/
theorem extend_preimage_inter_eq :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) ∩ range I =
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t := by
mfld_set_tac
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq
-- Porting note: an `aux` lemma that is no longer needed. Delete?
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux {s : Set M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)]
((f.extend I).target ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s : Set _) := by
rw [f.extend_target, inter_assoc, inter_comm (range I)]
conv =>
congr
· skip
rw [← univ_inter (_ ∩ range I)]
refine (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr ?_).symm.inter EventuallyEq.rfl
refine I.continuousAt_symm.preimage_mem_nhds (f.open_target.mem_nhds ?_)
simp_rw [f.extend_coe, Function.comp_apply, I.left_inv, f.mapsTo hx]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq_aux PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq {s : Set M} {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ f.source)
(hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)] f.extend I '' s := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ hx,
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset _ _ hx hs]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq
/-! We use the name `extend_coord_change` for `(f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I`. -/
theorem extend_coord_change_source :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source = I '' (f.symm ≫ₕ f').source := by
simp_rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.image_eq, extend_source, PartialEquiv.symm_source,
extend_target, inter_right_comm _ (range I)]
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source
theorem extend_image_source_inter :
f.extend I '' (f.source ∩ f'.source) = ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source := by
simp_rw [f.extend_coord_change_source, f.extend_coe, image_comp I f, trans_source'', symm_symm,
symm_target]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_image_source_inter PartialHomeomorph.extend_image_source_inter
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] x := by
rw [f.extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := hx
refine I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hx
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source)
(hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
apply extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf, hxf'⟩
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within' PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
variable {f f'}
open SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem contDiffOn_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_coord_change_source, I.image_eq]
exact (StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas hf' hf).1
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_on_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffOn_extend_coord_change
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothManifoldWithCorners.lean | 1,257 | 1,263 | theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) x := by |
apply (contDiffOn_extend_coord_change I hf hf' x hx).mono_of_mem
rw [extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := hx
exact I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hz)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.InitTail
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.truncated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"acbe099ced8be9c9754d62860110295cde0d7181"
/-!
# Truncated Witt vectors
The ring of truncated Witt vectors (of length `n`) is a quotient of the ring of Witt vectors.
It retains the first `n` coefficients of each Witt vector.
In this file, we set up the basic quotient API for this ring.
The ring of Witt vectors is the projective limit of all the rings of truncated Witt vectors.
## Main declarations
- `TruncatedWittVector`: the underlying type of the ring of truncated Witt vectors
- `TruncatedWittVector.instCommRing`: the ring structure on truncated Witt vectors
- `WittVector.truncate`: the quotient homomorphism that truncates a Witt vector,
to obtain a truncated Witt vector
- `TruncatedWittVector.truncate`: the homomorphism that truncates
a truncated Witt vector of length `n` to one of length `m` (for some `m ≤ n`)
- `WittVector.lift`: the unique ring homomorphism into the ring of Witt vectors
that is compatible with a family of ring homomorphisms to the truncated Witt vectors:
this realizes the ring of Witt vectors as projective limit of the rings of truncated Witt vectors
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open Function (Injective Surjective)
noncomputable section
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) (R : Type*)
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
/-- A truncated Witt vector over `R` is a vector of elements of `R`,
i.e., the first `n` coefficients of a Witt vector.
We will define operations on this type that are compatible with the (untruncated) Witt
vector operations.
`TruncatedWittVector p n R` takes a parameter `p : ℕ` that is not used in the definition.
In practice, this number `p` is assumed to be a prime number,
and under this assumption we construct a ring structure on `TruncatedWittVector p n R`.
(`TruncatedWittVector p₁ n R` and `TruncatedWittVector p₂ n R` are definitionally
equal as types but will have different ring operations.)
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def TruncatedWittVector (_ : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) :=
Fin n → R
#align truncated_witt_vector TruncatedWittVector
instance (p n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
variable {n R}
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable (p)
/-- Create a `TruncatedWittVector` from a vector `x`. -/
def mk (x : Fin n → R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
x
#align truncated_witt_vector.mk TruncatedWittVector.mk
variable {p}
/-- `x.coeff i` is the `i`th entry of `x`. -/
def coeff (i : Fin n) (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : R :=
x i
#align truncated_witt_vector.coeff TruncatedWittVector.coeff
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : TruncatedWittVector p n R} (h : ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i) : x = y :=
funext h
#align truncated_witt_vector.ext TruncatedWittVector.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : TruncatedWittVector p n R} : x = y ↔ ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i :=
⟨fun h i => by rw [h], ext⟩
#align truncated_witt_vector.ext_iff TruncatedWittVector.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (x : Fin n → R) (i : Fin n) : (mk p x).coeff i = x i :=
rfl
#align truncated_witt_vector.coeff_mk TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_coeff (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : (mk p fun i => x.coeff i) = x := by
ext i; rw [coeff_mk]
#align truncated_witt_vector.mk_coeff TruncatedWittVector.mk_coeff
variable [CommRing R]
/-- We can turn a truncated Witt vector `x` into a Witt vector
by setting all coefficients after `x` to be 0.
-/
def out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : 𝕎 R :=
@WittVector.mk' p _ fun i => if h : i < n then x.coeff ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
#align truncated_witt_vector.out TruncatedWittVector.out
@[simp]
theorem coeff_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) (i : Fin n) : x.out.coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [out]; dsimp only; rw [dif_pos i.is_lt, Fin.eta]
#align truncated_witt_vector.coeff_out TruncatedWittVector.coeff_out
theorem out_injective : Injective (@out p n R _) := by
intro x y h
ext i
rw [WittVector.ext_iff] at h
simpa only [coeff_out] using h ↑i
#align truncated_witt_vector.out_injective TruncatedWittVector.out_injective
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
variable (n)
section
/-- `truncateFun n x` uses the first `n` entries of `x` to construct a `TruncatedWittVector`,
which has the same base `p` as `x`.
This function is bundled into a ring homomorphism in `WittVector.truncate` -/
def truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
TruncatedWittVector.mk p fun i => x.coeff i
#align witt_vector.truncate_fun WittVector.truncateFun
end
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) (i : Fin n) : (truncateFun n x).coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [truncateFun, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk]
#align witt_vector.coeff_truncate_fun WittVector.coeff_truncateFun
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem out_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : (truncateFun n x).out = init n x := by
ext i
dsimp [TruncatedWittVector.out, init, select, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hi; swap; · rfl
rw [coeff_truncateFun, Fin.val_mk]
#align witt_vector.out_truncate_fun WittVector.out_truncateFun
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : x.out.truncateFun n = x := by
simp only [WittVector.truncateFun, coeff_out, mk_coeff]
#align truncated_witt_vector.truncate_fun_out TruncatedWittVector.truncateFun_out
open WittVector
variable (p n R)
instance : Zero (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 0⟩
instance : One (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 1⟩
instance : NatCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : IntCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : Add (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out + y.out)⟩
instance : Mul (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out * y.out)⟩
instance : Neg (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x => truncateFun n (-x.out)⟩
instance : Sub (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out - y.out)⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
#align truncated_witt_vector.has_nat_scalar TruncatedWittVector.hasNatScalar
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
#align truncated_witt_vector.has_int_scalar TruncatedWittVector.hasIntScalar
instance hasNatPow : Pow (TruncatedWittVector p n R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x m => truncateFun n (x.out ^ m)⟩
#align truncated_witt_vector.has_nat_pow TruncatedWittVector.hasNatPow
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (i : Fin n) : (0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R).coeff i = 0 := by
show coeff i (truncateFun _ 0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R) = 0
rw [coeff_truncateFun, WittVector.zero_coeff]
#align truncated_witt_vector.coeff_zero TruncatedWittVector.coeff_zero
end TruncatedWittVector
/-- A macro tactic used to prove that `truncateFun` respects ring operations. -/
macro (name := witt_truncateFun_tac) "witt_truncateFun_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ show _ = WittVector.truncateFun n _
apply TruncatedWittVector.out_injective
iterate rw [WittVector.out_truncateFun]
first
| rw [WittVector.init_add]
| rw [WittVector.init_mul]
| rw [WittVector.init_neg]
| rw [WittVector.init_sub]
| rw [WittVector.init_nsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_zsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_pow]})
namespace WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [CommRing R]
theorem truncateFun_surjective : Surjective (@truncateFun p n R) :=
Function.RightInverse.surjective TruncatedWittVector.truncateFun_out
#align witt_vector.truncate_fun_surjective WittVector.truncateFun_surjective
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_zero : truncateFun n (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := rfl
#align witt_vector.truncate_fun_zero WittVector.truncateFun_zero
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_one : truncateFun n (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := rfl
#align witt_vector.truncate_fun_one WittVector.truncateFun_one
variable {p R}
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_add (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x + y) = truncateFun n x + truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
#align witt_vector.truncate_fun_add WittVector.truncateFun_add
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Truncated.lean | 259 | 261 | theorem truncateFun_mul (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x * y) = truncateFun n x * truncateFun n y := by |
witt_truncateFun_tac
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ddec54a71a0dd025c05445d467f1a2b7d586a3ba"
/-!
# Smooth manifolds (possibly with boundary or corners)
A smooth manifold is a manifold modelled on a normed vector space, or a subset like a
half-space (to get manifolds with boundaries) for which the changes of coordinates are smooth maps.
We define a model with corners as a map `I : H → E` embedding nicely the topological space `H` in
the vector space `E` (or more precisely as a structure containing all the relevant properties).
Given such a model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of local
homeomorphisms of `H` which are smooth when read in `E` (for any regularity `n : ℕ∞`).
With this groupoid at hand and the general machinery of charted spaces, we thus get the notion
of `C^n` manifold with respect to any model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`. We also introduce a
specific type class for `C^∞` manifolds as these are the most commonly used.
Some texts assume manifolds to be Hausdorff and secound countable. We (in mathlib) assume neither,
but add these assumptions later as needed. (Quite a few results still do not require them.)
## Main definitions
* `ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H` :
a structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space E over the field `𝕜`. This is all that is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
* `modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E` :
trivial model with corners structure on the space `E` embedded in itself by the identity.
* `contDiffGroupoid n I` :
when `I` is a model with corners on `(𝕜, E, H)`, this is the groupoid of partial homeos of `H`
which are of class `C^n` over the normed field `𝕜`, when read in `E`.
* `SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M` :
a type class saying that the charted space `M`, modelled on the space `H`, has `C^∞` changes of
coordinates with respect to the model with corners `I` on `(𝕜, E, H)`. This type class is just
a shortcut for `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)`.
* `extChartAt I x`:
in a smooth manifold with corners with the model `I` on `(E, H)`, the charts take values in `H`,
but often we may want to use their `E`-valued version, obtained by composing the charts with `I`.
Since the target is in general not open, we can not register them as partial homeomorphisms, but
we register them as `PartialEquiv`s.
`extChartAt I x` is the canonical such partial equiv around `x`.
As specific examples of models with corners, we define (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real`)
* `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` for the model space used to define
`n`-dimensional real manifolds without boundary (with notation `𝓡 n` in the locale `Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanHalfSpace n)` for the model space
used to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary (with notation `𝓡∂ n` in the locale
`Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanQuadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
With these definitions at hand, to invoke an `n`-dimensional real manifold without boundary,
one could use
`variable {n : ℕ} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M]`.
However, this is not the recommended way: a theorem proved using this assumption would not apply
for instance to the tangent space of such a manifold, which is modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` and not on `EuclideanSpace (Fin (2 * n))`!
In the same way, it would not apply to product manifolds, modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin m))`.
The right invocation does not focus on one specific construction, but on all constructions sharing
the right properties, like
`variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E E} [I.Boundaryless]
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace E M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]`
Here, `I.Boundaryless` is a typeclass property ensuring that there is no boundary (this is for
instance the case for `modelWithCornersSelf`, or products of these). Note that one could consider
as a natural assumption to only use the trivial model with corners `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ E`,
but again in product manifolds the natural model with corners will not be this one but the product
one (and they are not defeq as `(fun p : E × F ↦ (p.1, p.2))` is not defeq to the identity).
So, it is important to use the above incantation to maximize the applicability of theorems.
## Implementation notes
We want to talk about manifolds modelled on a vector space, but also on manifolds with
boundary, modelled on a half space (or even manifolds with corners). For the latter examples,
we still want to define smooth functions, tangent bundles, and so on. As smooth functions are
well defined on vector spaces or subsets of these, one could take for model space a subtype of a
vector space. With the drawback that the whole vector space itself (which is the most basic
example) is not directly a subtype of itself: the inclusion of `univ : Set E` in `Set E` would
show up in the definition, instead of `id`.
A good abstraction covering both cases it to have a vector
space `E` (with basic example the Euclidean space), a model space `H` (with basic example the upper
half space), and an embedding of `H` into `E` (which can be the identity for `H = E`, or
`Subtype.val` for manifolds with corners). We say that the pair `(E, H)` with their embedding is a
model with corners, and we encompass all the relevant properties (in particular the fact that the
image of `H` in `E` should have unique differentials) in the definition of `ModelWithCorners`.
We concentrate on `C^∞` manifolds: all the definitions work equally well for `C^n` manifolds, but
later on it is a pain to carry all over the smoothness parameter, especially when one wants to deal
with `C^k` functions as there would be additional conditions `k ≤ n` everywhere. Since one deals
almost all the time with `C^∞` (or analytic) manifolds, this seems to be a reasonable choice that
one could revisit later if needed. `C^k` manifolds are still available, but they should be called
using `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid k I)` where `I` is the model with corners.
I have considered using the model with corners `I` as a typeclass argument, possibly `outParam`, to
get lighter notations later on, but it did not turn out right, as on `E × F` there are two natural
model with corners, the trivial (identity) one, and the product one, and they are not defeq and one
needs to indicate to Lean which one we want to use.
This means that when talking on objects on manifolds one will most often need to specify the model
with corners one is using. For instance, the tangent bundle will be `TangentBundle I M` and the
derivative will be `mfderiv I I' f`, instead of the more natural notations `TangentBundle 𝕜 M` and
`mfderiv 𝕜 f` (the field has to be explicit anyway, as some manifolds could be considered both as
real and complex manifolds).
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w u' v' w'
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Manifold Filter Topology
/-- The extended natural number `∞` -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
/-! ### Models with corners. -/
/-- A structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space `E` over the field `𝕜`. This is all what is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
-/
@[ext] -- Porting note(#5171): was nolint has_nonempty_instance
structure ModelWithCorners (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] extends
PartialEquiv H E where
source_eq : source = univ
unique_diff' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 toPartialEquiv.target
continuous_toFun : Continuous toFun := by continuity
continuous_invFun : Continuous invFun := by continuity
#align model_with_corners ModelWithCorners
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] ModelWithCorners.source_eq
/-- A vector space is a model with corners. -/
def modelWithCornersSelf (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.refl E
source_eq := rfl
unique_diff' := uniqueDiffOn_univ
continuous_toFun := continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id
#align model_with_corners_self modelWithCornersSelf
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ", " E ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E
/-- A normed field is a model with corners. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 𝕜
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-- Coercion of a model with corners to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is actually
`e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to
switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' (e : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) fun _ => H → E := ⟨toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse to a model with corners, only registered as a `PartialEquiv`. -/
protected def symm : PartialEquiv E H :=
I.toPartialEquiv.symm
#align model_with_corners.symm ModelWithCorners.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E :=
I
#align model_with_corners.simps.apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : E → H :=
I.symm
#align model_with_corners.simps.symm_apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections ModelWithCorners (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Register a few lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts expressions in normal form
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe : (I.toPartialEquiv : H → E) = I :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
((ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E) = (e : H → E) :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_coe ModelWithCorners.mk_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe_symm : (I.toPartialEquiv.symm : E → H) = I.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe_symm ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_symm (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
(ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_symm ModelWithCorners.mk_symm
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous I :=
I.continuous_toFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous ModelWithCorners.continuous
protected theorem continuousAt {x} : ContinuousAt I x :=
I.continuous.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at ModelWithCorners.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I s x :=
I.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous I.symm :=
I.continuous_invFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous_symm ModelWithCorners.continuous_symm
theorem continuousAt_symm {x} : ContinuousAt I.symm x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousAt_symm
theorem continuousWithinAt_symm {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I.symm s x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_symm {s} : ContinuousOn I.symm s :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousOn
#align model_with_corners.continuous_on_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousOn_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem target_eq : I.target = range (I : H → E) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← I.source_eq]
exact I.image_source_eq_target.symm
#align model_with_corners.target_eq ModelWithCorners.target_eq
protected theorem unique_diff : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (range I) :=
I.target_eq ▸ I.unique_diff'
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff ModelWithCorners.unique_diff
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem left_inv (x : H) : I.symm (I x) = x := by refine I.left_inv' ?_; simp
#align model_with_corners.left_inv ModelWithCorners.left_inv
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse I.symm I :=
I.left_inv
#align model_with_corners.left_inverse ModelWithCorners.leftInverse
theorem injective : Injective I :=
I.leftInverse.injective
#align model_with_corners.injective ModelWithCorners.injective
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_comp_self : I.symm ∘ I = id :=
I.leftInverse.comp_eq_id
#align model_with_corners.symm_comp_self ModelWithCorners.symm_comp_self
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn I.symm I (range I) :=
I.leftInverse.rightInvOn_range
#align model_with_corners.right_inv_on ModelWithCorners.rightInvOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem right_inv {x : E} (hx : x ∈ range I) : I (I.symm x) = x :=
I.rightInvOn hx
#align model_with_corners.right_inv ModelWithCorners.right_inv
theorem preimage_image (s : Set H) : I ⁻¹' (I '' s) = s :=
I.injective.preimage_image s
#align model_with_corners.preimage_image ModelWithCorners.preimage_image
protected theorem image_eq (s : Set H) : I '' s = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I := by
refine (I.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage ?_).trans ?_
· rw [I.source_eq]; exact subset_univ _
· rw [inter_comm, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm]
#align model_with_corners.image_eq ModelWithCorners.image_eq
protected theorem closedEmbedding : ClosedEmbedding I :=
I.leftInverse.closedEmbedding I.continuous_symm I.continuous
#align model_with_corners.closed_embedding ModelWithCorners.closedEmbedding
theorem isClosed_range : IsClosed (range I) :=
I.closedEmbedding.isClosed_range
#align model_with_corners.closed_range ModelWithCorners.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")] alias closed_range := isClosed_range
theorem map_nhds_eq (x : H) : map I (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhds_eq x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (s : Set H) (x : H) : map I (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[I '' s] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq s x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_within_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhdsWithin_eq
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin {x : H} {s : Set H} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : I '' s ∈ 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align model_with_corners.image_mem_nhds_within ModelWithCorners.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_image {x : H} {s : Set H} : map I.symm (𝓝[I '' s] I x) = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [← I.map_nhdsWithin_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_image ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_range (x : H) : map I.symm (𝓝[range I] I x) = 𝓝 x := by
rw [← I.map_nhds_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_range ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range
theorem unique_diff_preimage {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact I.unique_diff.inter (hs.preimage I.continuous_invFun)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage
theorem unique_diff_preimage_source {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {e : PartialHomeomorph H β} :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ range I) :=
I.unique_diff_preimage e.open_source
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage_source ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage_source
theorem unique_diff_at_image {x : H} : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (range I) (I x) :=
I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_at_image ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_at_image
theorem symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : H → X} {s : Set H}
{x : H} :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.comp I.continuousWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
simp_rw [preimage_inter, preimage_preimage, I.left_inv, preimage_id', preimage_range,
inter_univ] at this
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, I.symm_comp_self] at this
· rw [← I.left_inv x] at h; exact h.comp I.continuousWithinAt_symm inter_subset_left
#align model_with_corners.symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff ModelWithCorners.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
protected theorem locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
LocallyCompactSpace H := by
have : ∀ x : H, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 (I x) ∧ IsCompact s)
fun s => I.symm '' (s ∩ range I) := fun x ↦ by
rw [← I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (I x)).inf_principal _).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨-, hsc⟩
exact (hsc.inter_right I.isClosed_range).image I.continuous_symm
#align model_with_corners.locally_compact ModelWithCorners.locallyCompactSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem secondCountableTopology [SecondCountableTopology E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
SecondCountableTopology H :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
#align model_with_corners.second_countable_topology ModelWithCorners.secondCountableTopology
end ModelWithCorners
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- In the trivial model with corners, the associated `PartialEquiv` is the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv : 𝓘(𝕜, E).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl E :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_local_equiv modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe : (𝓘(𝕜, E) : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe modelWithCornersSelf_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm : (𝓘(𝕜, E).symm : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe_symm modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm
end
end
section ModelWithCornersProd
/-- Given two model_with_corners `I` on `(E, H)` and `I'` on `(E', H')`, we define the model with
corners `I.prod I'` on `(E × E', ModelProd H H')`. This appears in particular for the manifold
structure on the tangent bundle to a manifold modelled on `(E, H)`: it will be modelled on
`(E × E, H × E)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about `ModelProd H H'`
vs `H × H'`. -/
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def ModelWithCorners.prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E') (ModelProd H H') :=
{ I.toPartialEquiv.prod I'.toPartialEquiv with
toFun := fun x => (I x.1, I' x.2)
invFun := fun x => (I.symm x.1, I'.symm x.2)
source := { x | x.1 ∈ I.source ∧ x.2 ∈ I'.source }
source_eq := by simp only [setOf_true, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := I.unique_diff'.prod I'.unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := I.continuous_toFun.prod_map I'.continuous_toFun
continuous_invFun := I.continuous_invFun.prod_map I'.continuous_invFun }
#align model_with_corners.prod ModelWithCorners.prod
/-- Given a finite family of `ModelWithCorners` `I i` on `(E i, H i)`, we define the model with
corners `pi I` on `(Π i, E i, ModelPi H)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about
`ModelPi H`. -/
def ModelWithCorners.pi {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
{E : ι → Type w} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {H : ι → Type u'}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (I : ∀ i, ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E i) (H i)) :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) (ModelPi H) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (I i).toPartialEquiv
source_eq := by simp only [pi_univ, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := UniqueDiffOn.pi ι E _ _ fun i _ => (I i).unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous.comp (continuous_apply i)
continuous_invFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous_symm.comp (continuous_apply i)
#align model_with_corners.pi ModelWithCorners.pi
/-- Special case of product model with corners, which is trivial on the second factor. This shows up
as the model to tangent bundles. -/
abbrev ModelWithCorners.tangent {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E) (ModelProd H E) :=
I.prod 𝓘(𝕜, E)
#align model_with_corners.tangent ModelWithCorners.tangent
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F']
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H}
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv :
(I.prod J).toPartialEquiv = I.toPartialEquiv.prod J.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_to_local_equiv modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
(I.prod I' : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I I' :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe modelWithCorners_prod_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
((I.prod I').symm : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I.symm I'.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe_symm modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_prod : 𝓘(𝕜, E × F) = 𝓘(𝕜, E).prod 𝓘(𝕜, F) := by ext1 <;> simp
#align model_with_corners_self_prod modelWithCornersSelf_prod
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_prod : range (I.prod J) = range I ×ˢ range J := by
simp_rw [← ModelWithCorners.target_eq]; rfl
#align model_with_corners.range_prod ModelWithCorners.range_prod
end ModelWithCornersProd
section Boundaryless
/-- Property ensuring that the model with corners `I` defines manifolds without boundary. This
differs from the more general `BoundarylessManifold`, which requires every point on the manifold
to be an interior point. -/
class ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : Prop where
range_eq_univ : range I = univ
#align model_with_corners.boundaryless ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] :
range I = univ := ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ
/-- If `I` is a `ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless` model, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps (config := {simpRhs := true})]
def ModelWithCorners.toHomeomorph {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] : H ≃ₜ E where
__ := I
left_inv := I.left_inv
right_inv _ := I.right_inv <| I.range_eq_univ.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- The trivial model with corners has no boundary -/
instance modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E).Boundaryless :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align model_with_corners_self_boundaryless modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless
/-- If two model with corners are boundaryless, their product also is -/
instance ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H')
[I'.Boundaryless] : (I.prod I').Boundaryless := by
constructor
dsimp [ModelWithCorners.prod, ModelProd]
rw [← prod_range_range_eq, ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ,
ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ, univ_prod_univ]
#align model_with_corners.range_eq_univ_prod ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod
end Boundaryless
section contDiffGroupoid
/-! ### Smooth functions on models with corners -/
variable {m n : ℕ∞} {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
variable (n)
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the pregroupoid of `C^n` transformations of `H`
as the maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffPregroupoid : Pregroupoid H where
property f s := ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
comp {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ := by
have : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
simp only [this]
refine hg.comp (hf.mono fun x ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ ↦ ⟨hx1.1, hx2⟩) ?_
rintro x ⟨hx1, _⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx1 ⊢
exact hx1.2
id_mem := by
apply ContDiffOn.congr contDiff_id.contDiffOn
rintro x ⟨_, hx2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hx2 with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy]
simp only [mfld_simps]
locality {f u} _ H := by
apply contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rcases H x hy1 with ⟨v, v_open, xv, hv⟩
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' u ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' v := by
rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc, inter_assoc]
congr 1
rw [inter_comm]
rw [this] at hv
exact ⟨I.symm ⁻¹' v, v_open.preimage I.continuous_symm, by simpa, hv⟩
congr {f g u} _ fg hf := by
apply hf.congr
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rw [fg _ hy1]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of invertible `C^n` transformations
of `H` as the invertible maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (contDiffPregroupoid n I)
#align cont_diff_groupoid contDiffGroupoid
variable {n}
/-- Inclusion of the groupoid of `C^n` local diffeos in the groupoid of `C^m` local diffeos when
`m ≤ n` -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_le (h : m ≤ n) : contDiffGroupoid n I ≤ contDiffGroupoid m I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, contDiffGroupoid]
apply groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le
intro f s hfs
exact ContDiffOn.of_le hfs h
#align cont_diff_groupoid_le contDiffGroupoid_le
/-- The groupoid of `0`-times continuously differentiable maps is just the groupoid of all
partial homeomorphisms -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq : contDiffGroupoid 0 I = continuousGroupoid H := by
apply le_antisymm le_top
intro u _
-- we have to check that every partial homeomorphism belongs to `contDiffGroupoid 0 I`,
-- by unfolding its definition
change u ∈ contDiffGroupoid 0 I
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid, contDiffPregroupoid]
simp only [contDiffOn_zero]
constructor
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.symm.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
#align cont_diff_groupoid_zero_eq contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq
variable (n)
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid]
suffices h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) by
simp [h, contDiffPregroupoid]
have : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n id (univ : Set E) := contDiff_id.contDiffOn
exact this.congr_mono (fun x hx => I.right_inv hx.2) (subset_univ _)
#align of_set_mem_cont_diff_groupoid ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I e.open_target) this
#align symm_trans_mem_cont_diff_groupoid symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid
variable {E' H' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
/-- The product of two smooth partial homeomorphisms is smooth. -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_prod {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'} (he : e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I)
(he' : e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I') : e.prod e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ (I.prod I') := by
cases' he with he he_symm
cases' he' with he' he'_symm
simp only at he he_symm he' he'_symm
constructor <;> simp only [PartialEquiv.prod_source, PartialHomeomorph.prod_toPartialEquiv,
contDiffPregroupoid]
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he he'
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he_symm he'_symm
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
#align cont_diff_groupoid_prod contDiffGroupoid_prod
/-- The `C^n` groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (contDiffGroupoid n I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (contDiffGroupoid n I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I hs)
end contDiffGroupoid
section analyticGroupoid
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of analytic transformations of `H`
as the maps that are analytic and map interior to interior when read in `E` through `I`. We also
explicitly define that they are `C^∞` on the whole domain, since we are only requiring
analyticity on the interior of the domain. -/
def analyticGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) ⊓ Pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := fun f s => AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I)
comp := fun {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ => by
simp only [] at hf hg ⊢
have comp : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
apply And.intro
· simp only [comp, preimage_inter]
refine hg.left.comp (hf.left.mono ?_) ?_
· simp only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_right]
rw [inter_assoc]
simp
· intro x hx
apply And.intro
· rw [mem_preimage, comp_apply, I.left_inv]
exact hx.left.right
· apply hf.right
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨x, ⟨⟨hx.left.left, hx.right⟩, rfl⟩⟩
· simp only [comp]
rw [image_comp]
intro x hx
rw [mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx'⟩
refine hg.right ⟨x', And.intro ?_ hx'.right⟩
apply And.intro
· have hx'1 : x' ∈ ((v.preimage f).preimage (I.symm)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) := by
refine image_subset (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ?_ hx'.left
rw [preimage_inter]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (u.preimage I.symm).inter_subset_right
apply inter_subset_left
rcases hx'1 with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
rw [hx''.right.symm]
simp only [comp_apply, mem_preimage, I.left_inv]
exact hx''.left
· rw [mem_image] at hx'
rcases hx'.left with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
exact hf.right ⟨x'', ⟨⟨hx''.left.left.left, hx''.left.right⟩, hx''.right⟩⟩
id_mem := by
apply And.intro
· simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact AnalyticOn.congr isOpen_interior
(f := (1 : E →L[𝕜] E)) (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
(fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz)).symm)
· intro x hx
simp only [id_comp, comp_apply, preimage_univ, univ_inter, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left)]
exact hy.left
locality := fun {f u} _ h => by
simp only [] at h
simp only [AnalyticOn]
apply And.intro
· intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) (mem_preimage.mp hx.left) with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact hv.right.right.left x ⟨mem_preimage.mpr ⟨hx.left, hv.right.left⟩, hx.right⟩
· apply mapsTo'.mp
simp only [MapsTo]
intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) hx.left with ⟨v, hv⟩
apply hv.right.right.right
rw [mem_image]
have hx' := And.intro hx (mem_preimage.mpr hv.right.left)
rw [← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, ← preimage_inter, inter_comm v u] at hx'
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx', rfl⟩⟩
congr := fun {f g u} hu fg hf => by
simp only [] at hf ⊢
apply And.intro
· refine AnalyticOn.congr (IsOpen.inter (hu.preimage I.continuous_symm) isOpen_interior)
hf.left ?_
intro z hz
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [fg (I.symm z) hz.left]
· intro x hx
apply hf.right
rw [mem_image] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy.left, ?_⟩⟩
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, fg (I.symm y) hy.left.left] at hy
exact hy.right }
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ analyticGroupoid I := by
rw [analyticGroupoid]
refine And.intro (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid ∞ I hs) ?_
apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr
suffices h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I) by
simp only [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_apply, id_comp, PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_toPartialEquiv,
PartialEquiv.ofSet_source, h, comp_apply, mem_range, image_subset_iff, true_and,
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_symm, PartialEquiv.ofSet_target, and_self]
intro x hx
refine mem_preimage.mpr ?_
rw [← I.right_inv (interior_subset hx.right)] at hx
exact hx.right
apply And.intro
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (1 : E →L[𝕜] E) (univ : Set E) := (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
exact (this.mono (subset_univ (s.preimage (I.symm) ∩ interior (range I)))).congr
((hs.preimage I.continuous_symm).inter isOpen_interior)
fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz.right)).symm
· intro x hx
simp only [comp_apply, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left.right)]
exact hy.left.right
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_analyticGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ analyticGroupoid I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I e.open_target) this
/-- The analytic groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (analyticGroupoid I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (analyticGroupoid I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I hs)
/-- The analytic groupoid on a boundaryless charted space modeled on a complete vector space
consists of the partial homeomorphisms which are analytic and have analytic inverse. -/
theorem mem_analyticGroupoid_of_boundaryless [CompleteSpace E] [I.Boundaryless]
(e : PartialHomeomorph H H) :
e ∈ analyticGroupoid I ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.source) ∧
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.target) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro he
have := mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mp he.right
simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ, interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true] at this ⊢
exact this
· intro he
apply And.intro
all_goals apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr; simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ,
interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true, contDiffPregroupoid] at he ⊢
· exact ⟨he.left.contDiffOn, he.right.contDiffOn⟩
· exact he
end analyticGroupoid
section SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/-! ### Smooth manifolds with corners -/
/-- Typeclass defining smooth manifolds with corners with respect to a model with corners, over a
field `𝕜` and with infinite smoothness to simplify typeclass search and statements later on. -/
class SmoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] extends
HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) : Prop
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[gr : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M :=
{ gr with }
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.mk' SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk'
theorem smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
(h : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M →
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (I ∘ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source ∩ range I)) :
SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M where
compatible := by
haveI : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) := hasGroupoid_of_pregroupoid _ (h _ _)
apply StructureGroupoid.compatible
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners_of_cont_diff_on smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn
/-- For any model with corners, the model space is a smooth manifold -/
instance model_space_smooth {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I H :=
{ hasGroupoid_model_space _ _ with }
#align model_space_smooth model_space_smooth
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/- We restate in the namespace `SmoothManifoldWithCorners` some lemmas that hold for general
charted space with a structure groupoid, avoiding the need to specify the groupoid
`contDiffGroupoid ∞ I` explicitly. -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
/-- The maximal atlas of `M` for the smooth manifold with corners structure corresponding to the
model with corners `I`. -/
def maximalAtlas :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I).maximalAtlas M
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.maximalAtlas
variable {M}
theorem subset_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] : atlas H M ⊆ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.subset_maximalAtlas _
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.subset_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.subset_maximalAtlas
theorem chart_mem_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x : M) :
chartAt H x ∈ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.chart_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.chart_mem_maximalAtlas
variable {I}
theorem compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) : e.symm.trans e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas
/-- The product of two smooth manifolds with corners is naturally a smooth manifold with corners. -/
instance prod {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (M' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M'] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners (I.prod I') (M × M') where
compatible := by
rintro f g ⟨f1, hf1, f2, hf2, rfl⟩ ⟨g1, hg1, g2, hg2, rfl⟩
rw [PartialHomeomorph.prod_symm, PartialHomeomorph.prod_trans]
have h1 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I).compatible hf1 hg1
have h2 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I').compatible hf2 hg2
exact contDiffGroupoid_prod h1 h2
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.prod SmoothManifoldWithCorners.prod
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) (h : e.source = Set.univ) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ (e.singletonChartedSpace h) :=
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (id _) <|
e.singleton_hasGroupoid h (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)
#align local_homeomorph.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [Nonempty M] {f : M → H}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ h.singletonChartedSpace :=
(h.toPartialHomeomorph f).singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners I (by simp)
#align open_embedding.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
open TopologicalSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (s : Opens M)
instance : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I s :=
{ s.instHasGroupoid (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) with }
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
section ExtendedCharts
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 E M H E' M' H' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] (f f' : PartialHomeomorph M H)
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
[TopologicalSpace M'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {s t : Set M}
/-!
### Extended charts
In a smooth manifold with corners, the model space is the space `H`. However, we will also
need to use extended charts taking values in the model vector space `E`. These extended charts are
not `PartialHomeomorph` as the target is not open in `E` in general, but we can still register them
as `PartialEquiv`.
-/
namespace PartialHomeomorph
/-- Given a chart `f` on a manifold with corners, `f.extend I` is the extended chart to the model
vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extend : PartialEquiv M E :=
f.toPartialEquiv ≫ I.toPartialEquiv
#align local_homeomorph.extend PartialHomeomorph.extend
theorem extend_coe : ⇑(f.extend I) = I ∘ f :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe
theorem extend_coe_symm : ⇑(f.extend I).symm = f.symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe_symm PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe_symm
theorem extend_source : (f.extend I).source = f.source := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.source_eq, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_source
theorem isOpen_extend_source : IsOpen (f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_source]
exact f.open_source
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_source PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_source
theorem extend_target : (f.extend I).target = I.symm ⁻¹' f.target ∩ range I := by
simp_rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm, inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target PartialHomeomorph.extend_target
theorem extend_target' : (f.extend I).target = I '' f.target := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target'', I.source_eq, univ_inter, I.toPartialEquiv_coe]
lemma isOpen_extend_target [I.Boundaryless] : IsOpen (f.extend I).target := by
rw [extend_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact I.continuous_symm.isOpen_preimage _ f.open_target
theorem mapsTo_extend (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
MapsTo (f.extend I) s ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [mapsTo', extend_coe, extend_coe_symm, preimage_comp, ← I.image_eq, image_comp,
f.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hs]
exact image_subset _ inter_subset_right
#align local_homeomorph.maps_to_extend PartialHomeomorph.mapsTo_extend
theorem extend_left_inv {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) = x :=
(f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_left_inv PartialHomeomorph.extend_left_inv
/-- Variant of `f.extend_left_inv I`, stated in terms of images. -/
lemma extend_left_inv' (ht: t ⊆ f.source) : ((f.extend I).symm ∘ (f.extend I)) '' t = t :=
EqOn.image_eq_self (fun _ hx ↦ f.extend_left_inv I (ht hx))
theorem extend_source_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(isOpen_extend_source f I).mem_nhds <| by rwa [f.extend_source I]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds
theorem extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extend : ContinuousOn (f.extend I) (f.extend I).source := by
refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn ?_
rw [extend_source]
exact f.continuousOn
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend
theorem continuousAt_extend {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : ContinuousAt (f.extend I) x :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).continuousAt <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend
theorem map_extend_nhds {x : M} (hy : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [extend_coe, comp_apply, ← I.map_nhds_eq, ← f.map_nhds_eq, map_map]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhds
theorem map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
rw [f.map_extend_nhds _ hx, I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
(f.extend I).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [← PartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target, ← map_extend_nhds f I hy]
exact image_mem_map (extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x} (hx : x ∈ f.source)
{s : Set M} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : (f.extend I) '' s ∈ 𝓝 ((f.extend I) x) := by
rw [← f.map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless _ hx, Filter.mem_map]
filter_upwards [h] using subset_preimage_image (f.extend I) s
theorem extend_target_subset_range : (f.extend I).target ⊆ range I := by simp only [mfld_simps]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_subset_range PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_subset_range
lemma interior_extend_target_subset_interior_range :
interior (f.extend I).target ⊆ interior (range I) := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq]
exact inter_subset_right
/-- If `y ∈ f.target` and `I y ∈ interior (range I)`,
then `I y` is an interior point of `(I ∘ f).target`. -/
lemma mem_interior_extend_target {y : H} (hy : y ∈ f.target)
(hy' : I y ∈ interior (range I)) : I y ∈ interior (f.extend I).target := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq,
mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨mem_of_eq_of_mem (I.left_inv (y)) hy, hy'⟩
theorem nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
𝓝[(f.extend I).target] f.extend I y = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y :=
(nhdsWithin_mono _ (extend_target_subset_range _ _)).antisymm <|
nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.nhds_within_extend_target_eq PartialHomeomorph.nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm' {x : E} (h : x ∈ (f.extend I).target) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm x :=
(f.continuousAt_symm h.2).comp I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm' PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' f I <| (f.extend I).map_source <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm
theorem continuousOn_extend_symm : ContinuousOn (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I).target := fun _ h =>
(continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend_symm
theorem extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {g : M → X}
{s : Set M} {x : M} :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I x) ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f.symm) (f.symm ⁻¹' s) (f x) := by
rw [← I.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff]; rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage' {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((f.extend I).source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).isOpen_inter_preimage (isOpen_extend_source _ _) hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage' PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (f.source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extend_source f I]; exact isOpen_extend_preimage' f I hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' ((f.extend I).source ∩ s)] f.extend I y := by
set e := f.extend I
calc
map e (𝓝[s] y) = map e (𝓝[e.source ∩ s] y) :=
congr_arg (map e) (nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin f I hy)).symm
_ = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e y :=
((f.extend I).leftInvOn.mono inter_subset_left).map_nhdsWithin_eq
((f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source])
(continuousAt_extend_symm f I hy).continuousWithinAt
(continuousAt_extend f I hy).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within_eq_image PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' s] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ hy, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
rwa [extend_source]
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image f I hy, nhdsWithin_inter, ←
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ hy, ← nhdsWithin_inter, (f.extend I).image_source_inter_eq',
inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝[s] y := by
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin f I hy, map_map, Filter.map_congr, map_id]
exact (f.extend I).leftInvOn.eqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝 y := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ, ← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I hy, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within_range PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range
theorem tendsto_extend_comp_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {g : α → M}
(hg : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ∈ f.source) {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
Tendsto (f.extend I ∘ g) l (𝓝 (f.extend I y)) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 y) := by
refine ⟨fun h u hu ↦ mem_map.2 ?_, (continuousAt_extend _ _ hy).tendsto.comp⟩
have := (f.continuousAt_extend_symm I hy).tendsto.comp h
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy] at this
filter_upwards [hg, mem_map.1 (this hu)] with z hz hzu
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), extend_left_inv _ _ hz, mem_preimage] using hzu
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
theorem continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'} {y : M}
(hy : y ∈ f.source) (hgy : g y ∈ f'.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousWithinAt (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm)
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I y) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s y := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy, f'.tendsto_extend_comp_iff _ _ hgy,
← f.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin I hy, tendsto_map'_iff]
rw [← f.map_extend_nhdsWithin I hy, eventually_map]
filter_upwards [inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (f.open_source.mem_nhds hy)] with z hz
rw [comp_apply, extend_left_inv _ _ hz.2]
exact hmaps hz.1
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
/-- If `s ⊆ f.source` and `g x ∈ f'.source` whenever `x ∈ s`, then `g` is continuous on `s` if and
only if `g` written in charts `f.extend I` and `f'.extend I'` is continuous on `f.extend I '' s`. -/
theorem continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'}
(hs : s ⊆ f.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousOn (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) (f.extend I '' s) ↔ ContinuousOn g s := by
refine forall_mem_image.trans <| forall₂_congr fun x hx ↦ ?_
refine (continuousWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_).trans
(continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff _ _ _ (hs hx) (hmaps hx) hmaps)
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin]
exacts [hs hx, hs hx, hs]
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I h, mem_map] at ht
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
apply (continuousAt_extend_symm f I h).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(f.extend I).left_inv]
rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds
/-- Technical lemma to rewrite suitably the preimage of an intersection under an extended chart, to
bring it into a convenient form to apply derivative lemmas. -/
theorem extend_preimage_inter_eq :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) ∩ range I =
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t := by
mfld_set_tac
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq
-- Porting note: an `aux` lemma that is no longer needed. Delete?
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux {s : Set M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)]
((f.extend I).target ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s : Set _) := by
rw [f.extend_target, inter_assoc, inter_comm (range I)]
conv =>
congr
· skip
rw [← univ_inter (_ ∩ range I)]
refine (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr ?_).symm.inter EventuallyEq.rfl
refine I.continuousAt_symm.preimage_mem_nhds (f.open_target.mem_nhds ?_)
simp_rw [f.extend_coe, Function.comp_apply, I.left_inv, f.mapsTo hx]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq_aux PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq {s : Set M} {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ f.source)
(hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)] f.extend I '' s := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ hx,
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset _ _ hx hs]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq
/-! We use the name `extend_coord_change` for `(f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I`. -/
theorem extend_coord_change_source :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source = I '' (f.symm ≫ₕ f').source := by
simp_rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.image_eq, extend_source, PartialEquiv.symm_source,
extend_target, inter_right_comm _ (range I)]
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source
theorem extend_image_source_inter :
f.extend I '' (f.source ∩ f'.source) = ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source := by
simp_rw [f.extend_coord_change_source, f.extend_coe, image_comp I f, trans_source'', symm_symm,
symm_target]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_image_source_inter PartialHomeomorph.extend_image_source_inter
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] x := by
rw [f.extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := hx
refine I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hx
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source)
(hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
apply extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf, hxf'⟩
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within' PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
variable {f f'}
open SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem contDiffOn_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_coord_change_source, I.image_eq]
exact (StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas hf' hf).1
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_on_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffOn_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) x := by
apply (contDiffOn_extend_coord_change I hf hf' x hx).mono_of_mem
rw [extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := hx
exact I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hz)
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) (hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) (f'.extend I x) := by
refine contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change I hf hf' ?_
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf', hxf⟩
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change' PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change'
end PartialHomeomorph
open PartialHomeomorph
variable [ChartedSpace H M] [ChartedSpace H' M']
/-- The preferred extended chart on a manifold with corners around a point `x`, from a neighborhood
of `x` to the model vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extChartAt (x : M) : PartialEquiv M E :=
(chartAt H x).extend I
#align ext_chart_at extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_coe (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x) = I ∘ chartAt H x :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe extChartAt_coe
theorem extChartAt_coe_symm (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x).symm = (chartAt H x).symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe_symm extChartAt_coe_symm
theorem extChartAt_source (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source = (chartAt H x).source :=
extend_source _ _
#align ext_chart_at_source extChartAt_source
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_source (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).source :=
isOpen_extend_source _ _
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_source isOpen_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_source (x : M) : x ∈ (extChartAt I x).source := by
simp only [extChartAt_source, mem_chart_source]
#align mem_ext_chart_source mem_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_target (x : M) : extChartAt I x x ∈ (extChartAt I x).target :=
(extChartAt I x).map_source <| mem_extChartAt_source _ _
theorem extChartAt_target (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target = I.symm ⁻¹' (chartAt H x).target ∩ range I :=
extend_target _ _
#align ext_chart_at_target extChartAt_target
theorem uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target (x : M) : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target := by
rw [extChartAt_target]
exact I.unique_diff_preimage (chartAt H x).open_target
theorem uniqueDiffWithinAt_extChartAt_target (x : M) :
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target (extChartAt I x x) :=
uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target I x _ <| mem_extChartAt_target I x
theorem extChartAt_to_inv (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) = x :=
(extChartAt I x).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_to_inv extChartAt_to_inv
theorem mapsTo_extChartAt {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source) :
MapsTo (extChartAt I x) s ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) :=
mapsTo_extend _ _ hs
#align maps_to_ext_chart_at mapsTo_extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x' :=
extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds' extChartAt_source_mem_nhds'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds extChartAt_source_mem_nhds
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x' :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I h)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x) (extChartAt I x).source :=
continuousOn_extend _ _
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at continuousOn_extChartAt
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x' :=
continuousAt_extend _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at' continuousAt_extChartAt'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x :=
continuousAt_extChartAt' _ (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at continuousAt_extChartAt
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds' map_extChartAt_nhds'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds (x : M) : map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhds' I <| mem_extChartAt_source I x
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds map_extChartAt_nhds
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless (chartAt H x) I (mem_chart_source H x)
variable {x} in
theorem extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless]
{x : M} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : extChartAt I x '' s ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless _ I (mem_chart_source H x) hx
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin
/-- If we're boundaryless, `extChartAt` has open target -/
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_target [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).target := by
simp_rw [extChartAt_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_target _).preimage I.continuous_symm
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of the key point -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
convert extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin I x
simp only [I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of any of its points -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds' [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} {y : E}
(m : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) : (extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 y :=
(isOpen_extChartAt_target I x).mem_nhds m
theorem extChartAt_target_subset_range (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).target ⊆ range I := by
simp only [mfld_simps]
#align ext_chart_at_target_subset_range extChartAt_target_subset_range
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] extChartAt I x y = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq' nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq (x : M) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] (extChartAt I x) x = 𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' {x : M} {y : E} (h : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm y :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm'' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm''
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x x') :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' I <| (extChartAt I x).map_source h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm continuousAt_extChartAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x).target :=
fun _y hy => (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' _ hy).continuousWithinAt
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at_symm continuousOn_extChartAt_symm
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) :=
isOpen_extend_preimage' _ _ hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage' isOpen_extChartAt_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((chartAt H x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extChartAt_source I]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' I x hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage isOpen_extChartAt_preimage
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y) =
𝓝[s] y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y) = 𝓝 y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x) =
𝓝[s] x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x) = 𝓝 x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x' := by
rwa [← map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I h, mem_map] at ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of the
base point is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x) ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x') : (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x') :=
extend_preimage_mem_nhds _ _ (by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]) ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds' extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds'
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
is a neighborhood of the preimage. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothManifoldWithCorners.lean | 1,520 | 1,523 | theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 ((extChartAt I x) x) := by |
apply (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm I x).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(extChartAt I x).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source _ _)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Construction
#align_import category_theory.localization.predicate from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efef279998820353694feb6ff5631ed0d309ecc"
/-!
# Predicate for localized categories
In this file, a predicate `L.IsLocalization W` is introduced for a functor `L : C ⥤ D`
and `W : MorphismProperty C`: it expresses that `L` identifies `D` with the localized
category of `C` with respect to `W` (up to equivalence).
We introduce a universal property `StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget L W E` which
states that `L` inverts the morphisms in `W` and that all functors `C ⥤ E` inverting
`W` uniquely factors as a composition of `L ⋙ G` with `G : D ⥤ E`. Such universal
properties are inputs for the constructor `IsLocalization.mk'` for `L.IsLocalization W`.
When `L : C ⥤ D` is a localization functor for `W : MorphismProperty` (i.e. when
`[L.IsLocalization W]` holds), for any category `E`, there is
an equivalence `FunctorEquivalence L W E : (D ⥤ E) ≌ (W.FunctorsInverting E)`
that is induced by the composition with the functor `L`. When two functors
`F : C ⥤ E` and `F' : D ⥤ E` correspond via this equivalence, we shall say
that `F'` lifts `F`, and the associated isomorphism `L ⋙ F' ≅ F` is the
datum that is part of the class `Lifting L W F F'`. The functions
`liftNatTrans` and `liftNatIso` can be used to lift natural transformations
and natural isomorphisms between functors.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (L : C ⥤ D) (W : MorphismProperty C) (E : Type*)
[Category E]
namespace Functor
/-- The predicate expressing that, up to equivalence, a functor `L : C ⥤ D`
identifies the category `D` with the localized category of `C` with respect
to `W : MorphismProperty C`. -/
class IsLocalization : Prop where
/-- the functor inverts the given `MorphismProperty` -/
inverts : W.IsInvertedBy L
/-- the induced functor from the constructed localized category is an equivalence -/
isEquivalence : IsEquivalence (Localization.Construction.lift L inverts)
#align category_theory.functor.is_localization CategoryTheory.Functor.IsLocalization
instance q_isLocalization : W.Q.IsLocalization W where
inverts := W.Q_inverts
isEquivalence := by
suffices Localization.Construction.lift W.Q W.Q_inverts = 𝟭 _ by
rw [this]
infer_instance
apply Localization.Construction.uniq
simp only [Localization.Construction.fac]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.functor.Q_is_localization CategoryTheory.Functor.q_isLocalization
end Functor
namespace Localization
/-- This universal property states that a functor `L : C ⥤ D` inverts morphisms
in `W` and the all functors `D ⥤ E` (for a fixed category `E`) uniquely factors
through `L`. -/
structure StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget where
/-- the functor `L` inverts `W` -/
inverts : W.IsInvertedBy L
/-- any functor `C ⥤ E` which inverts `W` can be lifted as a functor `D ⥤ E` -/
lift : ∀ (F : C ⥤ E) (_ : W.IsInvertedBy F), D ⥤ E
/-- there is a factorisation involving the lifted functor -/
fac : ∀ (F : C ⥤ E) (hF : W.IsInvertedBy F), L ⋙ lift F hF = F
/-- uniqueness of the lifted functor -/
uniq : ∀ (F₁ F₂ : D ⥤ E) (_ : L ⋙ F₁ = L ⋙ F₂), F₁ = F₂
#align category_theory.localization.strict_universal_property_fixed_target CategoryTheory.Localization.StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget
/-- The localized category `W.Localization` that was constructed satisfies
the universal property of the localization. -/
@[simps]
def strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetQ : StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget W.Q W E where
inverts := W.Q_inverts
lift := Construction.lift
fac := Construction.fac
uniq := Construction.uniq
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.localization.strict_universal_property_fixed_target_Q CategoryTheory.Localization.strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetQ
instance : Inhabited (StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget W.Q W E) :=
⟨strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetQ _ _⟩
/-- When `W` consists of isomorphisms, the identity satisfies the universal property
of the localization. -/
@[simps]
def strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetId (hW : W ≤ MorphismProperty.isomorphisms C) :
StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget (𝟭 C) W E where
inverts X Y f hf := hW f hf
lift F _ := F
fac F hF := by
cases F
rfl
uniq F₁ F₂ eq := by
cases F₁
cases F₂
exact eq
#align category_theory.localization.strict_universal_property_fixed_target_id CategoryTheory.Localization.strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetId
end Localization
namespace Functor
theorem IsLocalization.mk' (h₁ : Localization.StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget L W D)
(h₂ : Localization.StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget L W W.Localization) :
IsLocalization L W :=
{ inverts := h₁.inverts
isEquivalence := IsEquivalence.mk' (h₂.lift W.Q W.Q_inverts)
(eqToIso (Localization.Construction.uniq _ _ (by
simp only [← Functor.assoc, Localization.Construction.fac, h₂.fac, Functor.comp_id])))
(eqToIso (h₁.uniq _ _ (by
simp only [← Functor.assoc, h₂.fac, Localization.Construction.fac, Functor.comp_id]))) }
#align category_theory.functor.is_localization.mk' CategoryTheory.Functor.IsLocalization.mk'
theorem IsLocalization.for_id (hW : W ≤ MorphismProperty.isomorphisms C) : (𝟭 C).IsLocalization W :=
IsLocalization.mk' _ _ (Localization.strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetId W _ hW)
(Localization.strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetId W _ hW)
#align category_theory.functor.is_localization.for_id CategoryTheory.Functor.IsLocalization.for_id
end Functor
namespace Localization
variable [L.IsLocalization W]
theorem inverts : W.IsInvertedBy L :=
(inferInstance : L.IsLocalization W).inverts
#align category_theory.localization.inverts CategoryTheory.Localization.inverts
/-- The isomorphism `L.obj X ≅ L.obj Y` that is deduced from a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` which
belongs to `W`, when `L.IsLocalization W`. -/
@[simps!]
def isoOfHom {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : W f) : L.obj X ≅ L.obj Y :=
haveI : IsIso (L.map f) := inverts L W f hf
asIso (L.map f)
#align category_theory.localization.iso_of_hom CategoryTheory.Localization.isoOfHom
instance : (Localization.Construction.lift L (inverts L W)).IsEquivalence :=
(inferInstance : L.IsLocalization W).isEquivalence
/-- A chosen equivalence of categories `W.Localization ≅ D` for a functor
`L : C ⥤ D` which satisfies `L.IsLocalization W`. This shall be used in
order to deduce properties of `L` from properties of `W.Q`. -/
def equivalenceFromModel : W.Localization ≌ D :=
(Localization.Construction.lift L (inverts L W)).asEquivalence
#align category_theory.localization.equivalence_from_model CategoryTheory.Localization.equivalenceFromModel
/-- Via the equivalence of categories `equivalence_from_model L W : W.localization ≌ D`,
one may identify the functors `W.Q` and `L`. -/
def qCompEquivalenceFromModelFunctorIso : W.Q ⋙ (equivalenceFromModel L W).functor ≅ L :=
eqToIso (Construction.fac _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.localization.Q_comp_equivalence_from_model_functor_iso CategoryTheory.Localization.qCompEquivalenceFromModelFunctorIso
/-- Via the equivalence of categories `equivalence_from_model L W : W.localization ≌ D`,
one may identify the functors `L` and `W.Q`. -/
def compEquivalenceFromModelInverseIso : L ⋙ (equivalenceFromModel L W).inverse ≅ W.Q :=
calc
L ⋙ (equivalenceFromModel L W).inverse ≅ _ :=
isoWhiskerRight (qCompEquivalenceFromModelFunctorIso L W).symm _
_ ≅ W.Q ⋙ (equivalenceFromModel L W).functor ⋙ (equivalenceFromModel L W).inverse :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _)
_ ≅ W.Q ⋙ 𝟭 _ := isoWhiskerLeft _ (equivalenceFromModel L W).unitIso.symm
_ ≅ W.Q := Functor.rightUnitor _
#align category_theory.localization.comp_equivalence_from_model_inverse_iso CategoryTheory.Localization.compEquivalenceFromModelInverseIso
theorem essSurj : L.EssSurj :=
⟨fun X =>
⟨(Construction.objEquiv W).invFun ((equivalenceFromModel L W).inverse.obj X),
Nonempty.intro
((qCompEquivalenceFromModelFunctorIso L W).symm.app _ ≪≫
(equivalenceFromModel L W).counitIso.app X)⟩⟩
#align category_theory.localization.ess_surj CategoryTheory.Localization.essSurj
/-- The functor `(D ⥤ E) ⥤ W.functors_inverting E` induced by the composition
with a localization functor `L : C ⥤ D` with respect to `W : morphism_property C`. -/
def whiskeringLeftFunctor : (D ⥤ E) ⥤ W.FunctorsInverting E :=
FullSubcategory.lift _ ((whiskeringLeft _ _ E).obj L)
(MorphismProperty.IsInvertedBy.of_comp W L (inverts L W))
#align category_theory.localization.whiskering_left_functor CategoryTheory.Localization.whiskeringLeftFunctor
instance : (whiskeringLeftFunctor L W E).IsEquivalence := by
let iso : (whiskeringLeft (MorphismProperty.Localization W) D E).obj
(equivalenceFromModel L W).functor ⋙
(Construction.whiskeringLeftEquivalence W E).functor ≅ whiskeringLeftFunctor L W E :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun F => eqToIso (by
ext
change (W.Q ⋙ Localization.Construction.lift L (inverts L W)) ⋙ F = L ⋙ F
rw [Construction.fac])) (fun τ => by
ext
dsimp [Construction.whiskeringLeftEquivalence, equivalenceFromModel, whiskerLeft]
erw [NatTrans.comp_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_app, eqToHom_app, eqToHom_refl,
eqToHom_refl, comp_id, id_comp]
· rfl
all_goals
change (W.Q ⋙ Localization.Construction.lift L (inverts L W)) ⋙ _ = L ⋙ _
rw [Construction.fac])
exact Functor.isEquivalence_of_iso iso
/-- The equivalence of categories `(D ⥤ E) ≌ (W.FunctorsInverting E)` induced by
the composition with a localization functor `L : C ⥤ D` with respect to
`W : MorphismProperty C`. -/
def functorEquivalence : D ⥤ E ≌ W.FunctorsInverting E :=
(whiskeringLeftFunctor L W E).asEquivalence
#align category_theory.localization.functor_equivalence CategoryTheory.Localization.functorEquivalence
/-- The functor `(D ⥤ E) ⥤ (C ⥤ E)` given by the composition with a localization
functor `L : C ⥤ D` with respect to `W : MorphismProperty C`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def whiskeringLeftFunctor' (_ : MorphismProperty C) (E : Type*) [Category E] :
(D ⥤ E) ⥤ C ⥤ E :=
(whiskeringLeft C D E).obj L
#align category_theory.localization.whiskering_left_functor' CategoryTheory.Localization.whiskeringLeftFunctor'
theorem whiskeringLeftFunctor'_eq :
whiskeringLeftFunctor' L W E = Localization.whiskeringLeftFunctor L W E ⋙ inducedFunctor _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.localization.whiskering_left_functor'_eq CategoryTheory.Localization.whiskeringLeftFunctor'_eq
variable {E} in
@[simp]
theorem whiskeringLeftFunctor'_obj (F : D ⥤ E) : (whiskeringLeftFunctor' L W E).obj F = L ⋙ F :=
rfl
#align category_theory.localization.whiskering_left_functor'_obj CategoryTheory.Localization.whiskeringLeftFunctor'_obj
instance : (whiskeringLeftFunctor' L W E).Full := by
rw [whiskeringLeftFunctor'_eq]
apply @Functor.Full.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· infer_instance
apply InducedCategory.full -- why is it not found automatically ???
instance : (whiskeringLeftFunctor' L W E).Faithful := by
rw [whiskeringLeftFunctor'_eq]
apply @Functor.Faithful.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· infer_instance
apply InducedCategory.faithful -- why is it not found automatically ???
lemma full_whiskeringLeft : ((whiskeringLeft C D E).obj L).Full :=
inferInstanceAs (whiskeringLeftFunctor' L W E).Full
lemma faithful_whiskeringLeft : ((whiskeringLeft C D E).obj L).Faithful :=
inferInstanceAs (whiskeringLeftFunctor' L W E).Faithful
variable {E}
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/Predicate.lean | 263 | 267 | theorem natTrans_ext {F₁ F₂ : D ⥤ E} (τ τ' : F₁ ⟶ F₂)
(h : ∀ X : C, τ.app (L.obj X) = τ'.app (L.obj X)) : τ = τ' := by |
haveI := essSurj L W
ext Y
rw [← cancel_epi (F₁.map (L.objObjPreimageIso Y).hom), τ.naturality, τ'.naturality, h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
#align_import number_theory.padics.padic_numbers from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b9b2114f7711fec1c1e055d507f082f8ceb2c3b7"
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
A small special-purpose simplification tactic, `padic_index_simp`, is used to manipulate sequence
indices in the proof that the norm extends.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Nat multiplicity padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
#align padic_seq PadicSeq
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
#align padic_seq.stationary PadicSeq.stationary
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
#align padic_seq.stationary_point PadicSeq.stationaryPoint
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
#align padic_seq.stationary_point_spec PadicSeq.stationaryPoint_spec
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
#align padic_seq.norm PadicSeq.norm
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
· contradiction
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
#align padic_seq.norm_zero_iff PadicSeq.norm_zero_iff
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
#align padic_seq.equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero PadicSeq.equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
#align padic_seq.norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero PadicSeq.norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
#align padic_seq.norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero PadicSeq.norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
#align padic_seq.not_lim_zero_const_of_nonzero PadicSeq.not_limZero_const_of_nonzero
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦ not_limZero_const_of_nonzero hq <| by simpa using h
#align padic_seq.not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero PadicSeq.not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
#align padic_seq.norm_nonneg PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
#align padic_seq.lift_index_left_left PadicSeq.lift_index_left_left
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
#align padic_seq.lift_index_left PadicSeq.lift_index_left
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
#align padic_seq.lift_index_right PadicSeq.lift_index_right
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `PadicSeq` -/
/-- The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `PadicSeq p`.
`Valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`. -/
def valuation (f : PadicSeq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicValRat p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
#align padic_seq.valuation PadicSeq.valuation
theorem norm_eq_pow_val {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-f.valuation : ℤ) := by
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padicNorm, if_neg]
intro H
apply CauSeq.not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
intro ε hε
use stationaryPoint hf
intro n hn
rw [stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hn]
simpa [H] using hε
#align padic_seq.norm_eq_pow_val PadicSeq.norm_eq_pow_val
theorem val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm := by
rw [norm_eq_pow_val hf, norm_eq_pow_val hg, ← neg_inj, zpow_inj]
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).pos
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
#align padic_seq.val_eq_iff_norm_eq PadicSeq.val_eq_iff_norm_eq
end Valuation
end PadicSeq
section
open PadicSeq
-- Porting note: Commented out `padic_index_simp` tactic
/-
private unsafe def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : Interactive.Loc := Interactive.Loc.ns [none]) : tactic Unit := do
let [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mapM fun n => tactic.mk_app `` stationary_point [n] <|> return n
let e1 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e2 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e3 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return q(True)
let sl ← [e1, e2, e3].foldlM (fun s e => simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk
when at_ (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip)
let hs ← at_.get_locals
hs (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
#align index_simp_core index_simp_core
/-- This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts `padicNorm (f (stationary_point f))` to
`padicNorm (f (max _ _ _))`. -/
unsafe def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic Unit := do
let [h, f, g] ← l.mapM tactic.i_to_expr
index_simp_core h f g at_
#align tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp
-/
end
namespace PadicSeq
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_mul (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero' _ hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hf : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero _ hg
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else by
unfold norm
split_ifs with hfg
· exact (mul_not_equiv_zero hf hg hfg).elim
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.mul
#align padic_seq.norm_mul PadicSeq.norm_mul
theorem eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
#align padic_seq.eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero PadicSeq.eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero
theorem ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬f ≈ 0 :=
not_iff_not.2 (eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _)
#align padic_seq.ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero PadicSeq.ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero
theorem norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padicNorm p) q) = padicNorm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then by
have : const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 := by simp [hq]; apply Setoid.refl (const (padicNorm p) 0)
subst hq; simp [norm, this]
else by
have : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 := not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq
simp [norm, this]
#align padic_seq.norm_const PadicSeq.norm_const
theorem norm_values_discrete (a : PadicSeq p) (ha : ¬a ≈ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, a.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) := by
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha
simpa [hk] using padicNorm.values_discrete hk'
#align padic_seq.norm_values_discrete PadicSeq.norm_values_discrete
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : PadicSeq p) = 1 := by
have h1 : ¬(1 : PadicSeq p) ≈ 0 := one_not_equiv_zero _
simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
#align padic_seq.norm_one PadicSeq.norm_one
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) ≠ padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)))
(hlt : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) :
False := by
have hpn : 0 < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) - padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) :=
sub_pos_of_lt hlt
cases' hfg _ hpn with N hN
let i := max N (max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg))
have hi : N ≤ i := le_max_left _ _
have hN' := hN _ hi
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt`
rw [lift_index_left hf N (stationaryPoint hg), lift_index_right hg N (stationaryPoint hf)]
at hN' h hlt
have hpne : padicNorm p (f i) ≠ padicNorm p (-g i) := by rwa [← padicNorm.neg (g i)] at h
rw [CauSeq.sub_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_max_of_ne hpne, padicNorm.neg, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
at hN'
have : padicNorm p (f i) < padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN'
apply sub_le_self
apply padicNorm.nonneg
exact lt_irrefl _ this
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) := by
by_contra h
cases'
Decidable.em
(padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) with
hlt hnlt
· exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt
· apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (Setoid.symm hfg) (Ne.symm h)
apply lt_of_le_of_ne
· apply le_of_not_gt hnlt
· apply h
theorem norm_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm hfg) hf
simp [norm, hf, hg]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := hf ∘ Setoid.trans hfg
unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
#align padic_seq.norm_equiv PadicSeq.norm_equiv
private theorem norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬f ≈ 0)
(hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
unfold norm; split_ifs
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm :=
if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then by
have : 0 ≤ max f.norm g.norm := le_max_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
simpa only [hfg, norm]
else
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g := by
change LimZero (f - 0) at hf
show LimZero (f + g - g); · simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right] using hf
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf
have : max f.norm g.norm = g.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f := by
change LimZero (g - 0) at hg
show LimZero (f + g - f); · simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero] using hg
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg
have : max f.norm g.norm = f.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
#align padic_seq.norm_nonarchimedean PadicSeq.norm_nonarchimedean
theorem norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := fun hg ↦
hf <| equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp only [h, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true]) hg
simp only [hg, hf, norm, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
let i := max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg)
have hpf : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
have hpg : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) = padicNorm p (g i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
#align padic_seq.norm_eq PadicSeq.norm_eq
theorem norm_neg (a : PadicSeq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq <| by simp
#align padic_seq.norm_neg PadicSeq.norm_neg
theorem norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm := by
have : LimZero (f + g - 0) := h
have : f ≈ -g := show LimZero (f - -g) by simpa only [sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
have : f.norm = (-g).norm := norm_equiv this
simpa only [norm_neg] using this
#align padic_seq.norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero PadicSeq.norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm :=
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0 := mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : f + g ≈ g := show LimZero (f + g - g) by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (g - 0) := hg
have : f + g ≈ f := show LimZero (f + g - f) by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)]
else by
unfold norm at hfgne ⊢; split_ifs at hfgne ⊢
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at hfgne ⊢`
rw [lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg] at hfgne
· rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
exact padicNorm.add_eq_max_of_ne hfgne
#align padic_seq.add_eq_max_of_ne PadicSeq.add_eq_max_of_ne
end Embedding
end PadicSeq
/-- The `p`-adic numbers `ℚ_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
-/
def Padic (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] :=
CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (padicNorm p)
#align padic Padic
/-- notation for p-padic rationals -/
notation "ℚ_[" p "]" => Padic p
namespace Padic
section Completion
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
instance field : Field ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.field
instance : Inhabited ℚ_[p] :=
⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : CommRing ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.commRing
instance : Ring ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.ring
instance : Zero ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : One ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Add ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Mul ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Sub ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Neg ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Div ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
/-- Builds the equivalence class of a Cauchy sequence of rationals. -/
def mk : PadicSeq p → ℚ_[p] :=
Quotient.mk'
#align padic.mk Padic.mk
variable (p)
theorem zero_def : (0 : ℚ_[p]) = ⟦0⟧ := rfl
#align padic.zero_def Padic.zero_def
theorem mk_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
Quotient.eq'
#align padic.mk_eq Padic.mk_eq
theorem const_equiv {q r : ℚ} : const (padicNorm p) q ≈ const (padicNorm p) r ↔ q = r :=
⟨fun heq ↦ eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| const_limZero.1 heq, fun heq ↦ by
rw [heq]⟩
#align padic.const_equiv Padic.const_equiv
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {q r : ℚ} : (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = ↑r ↔ q = r :=
⟨(const_equiv p).1 ∘ Quotient.eq'.1, fun h ↦ by rw [h]⟩
#align padic.coe_inj Padic.coe_inj
instance : CharZero ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun m n ↦ by
rw [← Rat.cast_natCast]
norm_cast
exact id⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x + y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x + ↑y :=
Rat.cast_add _ _
#align padic.coe_add Padic.coe_add
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ∀ {x : ℚ}, (↑(-x) : ℚ_[p]) = -↑x :=
Rat.cast_neg _
#align padic.coe_neg Padic.coe_neg
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x * y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x * ↑y :=
Rat.cast_mul _ _
#align padic.coe_mul Padic.coe_mul
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x - y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x - ↑y :=
Rat.cast_sub _ _
#align padic.coe_sub Padic.coe_sub
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_div : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x / y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x / ↑y :=
Rat.cast_div _ _
#align padic.coe_div Padic.coe_div
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : (↑(1 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
#align padic.coe_one Padic.coe_one
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
#align padic.coe_zero Padic.coe_zero
end Completion
end Padic
/-- The rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]` is lifted from the norm on Cauchy sequences. The
canonical form of this function is the normed space instance, with notation `‖ ‖`. -/
def padicNormE {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] : AbsoluteValue ℚ_[p] ℚ where
toFun := Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _
map_mul' q r := Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_mul
nonneg' q := Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
eq_zero' q := Quotient.inductionOn q fun r ↦ by
rw [Padic.zero_def, Quotient.eq]
exact PadicSeq.norm_zero_iff r
add_le' q r := by
trans
max ((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) q)
((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) r)
· exact Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonarchimedean
refine max_le_add_of_nonneg (Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg) ?_
exact Quotient.inductionOn r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
#align padic_norm_e padicNormE
namespace padicNormE
section Embedding
open PadicSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
-- Porting note: Expanded `⟦f⟧` to `Padic.mk f`
theorem defn (f : PadicSeq p) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (Padic.mk f - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
dsimp [padicNormE]
change ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε
by_contra! h
cases' cauchy₂ f hε with N hN
rcases h N with ⟨i, hi, hge⟩
have hne : ¬f - const (padicNorm p) (f i) ≈ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos h] at hge
exact not_lt_of_ge hge hε
unfold PadicSeq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge
· exact not_le_of_gt hε hge
apply not_le_of_gt _ hge
cases' _root_.em (N ≤ stationaryPoint hne) with hgen hngen
· apply hN _ hgen _ hi
· have := stationaryPoint_spec hne le_rfl (le_of_not_le hngen)
rw [← this]
exact hN _ le_rfl _ hi
#align padic_norm_e.defn padicNormE.defn
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem nonarchimedean' (q r : ℚ_[p]) :
padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) ≤ max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| norm_nonarchimedean
#align padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean' padicNormE.nonarchimedean'
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne' {q r : ℚ_[p]} :
padicNormE q ≠ padicNormE r → padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) = max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r fun _ _ ↦ PadicSeq.add_eq_max_of_ne
#align padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne' padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne'
@[simp]
theorem eq_padic_norm' (q : ℚ) : padicNormE (q : ℚ_[p]) = padicNorm p q :=
norm_const _
#align padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm' padicNormE.eq_padic_norm'
protected theorem image' {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, padicNormE q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-n) :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun f hf ↦
have : ¬f ≈ 0 := (ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf
norm_values_discrete f this
#align padic_norm_e.image' padicNormE.image'
end Embedding
end padicNormE
namespace Padic
section Complete
open PadicSeq Padic
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (f : CauSeq _ (@padicNormE p _))
theorem rat_dense' (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ r : ℚ, padicNormE (q - r : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun q' ↦
have : ∃ N, ∀ m ≥ N, ∀ n ≥ N, padicNorm p (q' m - q' n) < ε := cauchy₂ _ hε
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := this
⟨q' N, by
dsimp [padicNormE]
-- Porting note: `change` → `convert_to` (`change` times out!)
-- and add `PadicSeq p` type annotation
convert_to PadicSeq.norm (q' - const _ (q' N) : PadicSeq p) < ε
cases' Decidable.em (q' - const (padicNorm p) (q' N) ≈ 0) with heq hne'
· simpa only [heq, PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos]
· simp only [PadicSeq.norm, dif_neg hne']
change padicNorm p (q' _ - q' _) < ε
cases' Decidable.em (stationaryPoint hne' ≤ N) with hle hle
· -- Porting note: inlined `stationaryPoint_spec` invocation.
have := (stationaryPoint_spec hne' le_rfl hle).symm
simp only [const_apply, sub_apply, padicNorm.zero, sub_self] at this
simpa only [this]
· exact hN _ (lt_of_not_ge hle).le _ le_rfl⟩
#align padic.rat_dense' Padic.rat_dense'
open scoped Classical
private theorem div_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < 1 / (n + 1 : ℚ) :=
div_pos zero_lt_one (mod_cast succ_pos _)
/-- `limSeq f`, for `f` a Cauchy sequence of `p`-adic numbers, is a sequence of rationals with the
same limit point as `f`. -/
def limSeq : ℕ → ℚ :=
fun n ↦ Classical.choose (rat_dense' (f n) (div_nat_pos n))
#align padic.lim_seq Padic.limSeq
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - (limSeq f i : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
refine (exists_nat_gt (1 / ε)).imp fun N hN i hi ↦ ?_
have h := Classical.choose_spec (rat_dense' (f i) (div_nat_pos i))
refine lt_of_lt_of_le h ((div_le_iff' <| mod_cast succ_pos _).mpr ?_)
rw [right_distrib]
apply le_add_of_le_of_nonneg
· exact (div_le_iff hε).mp (le_trans (le_of_lt hN) (mod_cast hi))
· apply le_of_lt
simpa
#align padic.exi_rat_seq_conv Padic.exi_rat_seq_conv
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) (limSeq f) := fun ε hε ↦ by
have hε3 : 0 < ε / 3 := div_pos hε (by norm_num)
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f hε3
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := f.cauchy₂ hε3
exists max N N2
intro j hj
suffices
padicNormE (limSeq f j - f (max N N2) + (f (max N N2) - limSeq f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε by
ring_nf at this ⊢
rw [← padicNormE.eq_padic_norm']
exact mod_cast this
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· rw [← add_thirds ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· suffices padicNormE (limSeq f j - f j + (f j - f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε / 3 + ε / 3 by
simpa only [sub_add_sub_cancel]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· apply _root_.add_lt_add
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
apply mod_cast hN j
exact le_of_max_le_left hj
· exact hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hj) _ (le_max_right _ _)
· apply mod_cast hN (max N N2)
apply le_max_left
#align padic.exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy Padic.exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy
private def lim' : PadicSeq p :=
⟨_, exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy f⟩
private def lim : ℚ_[p] :=
⟦lim' f⟧
theorem complete' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (q - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
⟨lim f, fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f (half_pos hε)
obtain ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := padicNormE.defn (lim' f) (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨max N N2, fun i hi ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel _ (lim' f i : ℚ_[p]) _]
refine (padicNormE.add_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· apply hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hi)
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN _ (le_of_max_le_left hi)⟩
#align padic.complete' Padic.complete'
theorem complete'' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - q : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := complete' f
refine ⟨x, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hx ε hε
refine ⟨N, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN i hi
end Complete
section NormedSpace
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Dist ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x y ↦ padicNormE (x - y : ℚ_[p])⟩
instance metricSpace : MetricSpace ℚ_[p] where
dist_self := by simp [dist]
dist := dist
dist_comm x y := by simp [dist, ← padicNormE.map_neg (x - y : ℚ_[p])]
dist_triangle x y z := by
dsimp [dist]
exact mod_cast padicNormE.sub_le x y z
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := by
dsimp [dist]; intro _ _ h
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
apply padicNormE.eq_zero.1
exact mod_cast h
-- Porting note: added because autoparam was not ported
edist_dist := by intros; exact (ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _).symm
instance : Norm ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x ↦ padicNormE x⟩
instance normedField : NormedField ℚ_[p] :=
{ Padic.field,
Padic.metricSpace p with
dist_eq := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
norm_mul' := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
norm := norm }
instance isAbsoluteValue : IsAbsoluteValue fun a : ℚ_[p] ↦ ‖a‖ where
abv_nonneg' := norm_nonneg
abv_eq_zero' := norm_eq_zero
abv_add' := norm_add_le
abv_mul' := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
#align padic.is_absolute_value Padic.isAbsoluteValue
theorem rat_dense (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ r : ℚ, ‖q - r‖ < ε :=
let ⟨ε', hε'l, hε'r⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense' q (ε := ε') (by simpa using hε'l)
⟨r, lt_trans (by simpa [Norm.norm] using hr) hε'r⟩
#align padic.rat_dense Padic.rat_dense
end NormedSpace
end Padic
namespace padicNormE
section NormedSpace
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
-- Porting note: Linter thinks this is a duplicate simp lemma, so `priority` is assigned
@[simp (high)]
protected theorem mul (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ‖q * r‖ = ‖q‖ * ‖r‖ := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
#align padic_norm_e.mul padicNormE.mul
protected theorem is_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ↑(padicNormE q) = ‖q‖ := rfl
#align padic_norm_e.is_norm padicNormE.is_norm
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := by
dsimp [norm]
exact mod_cast nonarchimedean' _ _
#align padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean padicNormE.nonarchimedean
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖) : ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := by
dsimp [norm] at h ⊢
have : padicNormE q ≠ padicNormE r := mod_cast h
exact mod_cast add_eq_max_of_ne' this
#align padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eq_padicNorm (q : ℚ) : ‖(q : ℚ_[p])‖ = padicNorm p q := by
dsimp [norm]
rw [← padicNormE.eq_padic_norm']
#align padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm padicNormE.eq_padicNorm
@[simp]
theorem norm_p : ‖(p : ℚ_[p])‖ = (p : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
rw [← @Rat.cast_natCast ℝ _ p]
rw [← @Rat.cast_natCast ℚ_[p] _ p]
simp [hp.1.ne_zero, hp.1.ne_one, norm, padicNorm, padicValRat, padicValInt, zpow_neg,
-Rat.cast_natCast]
#align padic_norm_e.norm_p padicNormE.norm_p
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 845 | 848 | theorem norm_p_lt_one : ‖(p : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 := by |
rw [norm_p]
apply inv_lt_one
exact mod_cast hp.1.one_lt
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Basic
/-!
# Matroid Independence and Basis axioms
Matroids in mathlib are defined axiomatically in terms of bases,
but can be described just as naturally via their collections of independent sets,
and in fact such a description, being more 'verbose', can often be useful.
As well as this, the definition of a `Matroid` uses an unwieldy 'maximality'
axiom that can be dropped in cases where there is some finiteness assumption.
This file provides several ways to do define a matroid in terms of its independence or base
predicates, using axiom sets that are appropriate in different settings,
and often much simpler than the general definition.
It also contains `simp` lemmas and typeclasses as appropriate.
All the independence axiom sets need nontriviality (the empty set is independent),
monotonicity (subsets of independent sets are independent),
and some form of 'augmentation' axiom, which allows one to enlarge a non-maximal independent set.
This augmentation axiom is still required when there are finiteness assumptions, but is simpler.
It just states that if `I` is a finite independent set and `J` is a larger finite
independent set, then there exists `e ∈ J \ I` for which `insert e I` is independent.
This is the axiom that appears in all most of the definitions.
## Implementation Details
To facilitate building a matroid from its independent sets, we define a structure `IndepMatroid`
which has a ground set `E`, an independence predicate `Indep`, and some axioms as its fields.
This structure is another encoding of the data in a `Matroid`; the function `IndepMatroid.matroid`
constructs a `Matroid` from an `IndepMatroid`.
This is convenient because if one wants to define `M : Matroid α` from a known independence
predicate `Ind`, it is easier to define an `M' : IndepMatroid α` so that `M'.Indep = Ind` and
then set `M = M'.matroid` than it is to directly define `M` with the base axioms.
The simp lemma `IndepMatroid.matroid_indep_iff` is important here; it shows that `M.Indep = Ind`,
so the `Matroid` constructed is the right one, and the intermediate `IndepMatroid` can be
made essentially invisible by the simplifier when working with `M`.
Because of this setup, we don't define any API for `IndepMatroid`, as it would be
a redundant copy of the existing API for `Matroid.Indep`.
(In particular, one could define a natural equivalence `e : IndepMatroid α ≃ Matroid α`
with `e.toFun = IndepMatroid.matroid`, but this would be pointless, as there is no need
for the inverse of `e`).
## Main definitions
* `IndepMatroid α` is a matroid structure on `α` described in terms of its independent sets
in full generality, using infinite versions of the axioms.
* `IndepMatroid.matroid` turns `M' : IndepMatroid α` into `M : Matroid α` with `M'.Indep = M.Indep`.
* `IndepMatroid.ofFinitary` constructs an `IndepMatroid` whose associated `Matroid` is `Finitary`
in the special case where independence of a set is determined only by that of its
finite subsets. This construction uses Zorn's lemma.
* `IndepMatroid.ofBdd` constructs an `IndepMatroid` in the case where there is some known
absolute upper bound on the size of an independent set. This uses the infinite version of
the augmentation axiom; the corresponding `Matroid` is `FiniteRk`.
* `IndepMatroid.ofBddAugment` is the same as the above, but with a finite augmentation axiom.
* `IndepMatroid.ofFinite` constructs an `IndepMatroid` from a finite ground set in terms of
its independent sets.
* `IndepMatroid.ofFinset` constructs an `IndepMatroid α` whose corresponding matroid is `Finitary`
from an independence predicate on `Finset α`.
* `Matroid.ofExistsMatroid` constructs a 'copy' of a matroid that is known only
existentially, but whose independence predicate is known explicitly.
* `Matroid.ofExistsFiniteBase` constructs a matroid from its bases, if it is known that one
of them is finite. This gives a `FiniteRk` matroid.
* `Matroid.ofBaseOfFinite` constructs a `Finite` matroid from its bases.
-/
open Set Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {I B X : Set α}
section IndepMatroid
/-- A matroid as defined by the independence axioms. This is the same thing as a `Matroid`,
and so does not need its own API; it exists to make it easier to construct a matroid from its
independent sets. The constructed `IndepMatroid` can then be converted into a matroid
with `IndepMatroid.matroid`. -/
structure IndepMatroid (α : Type*) where
/-- The ground set -/
(E : Set α)
/-- The independence predicate -/
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
(indep_empty : Indep ∅)
(indep_subset : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep J → I ⊆ J → Indep I)
(indep_aug : ∀⦃I B⦄, Indep I → I ∉ maximals (· ⊆ ·) {I | Indep I} →
B ∈ maximals (· ⊆ ·) {I | Indep I} → ∃ x ∈ B \ I, Indep (insert x I))
(indep_maximal : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
(subset_ground : ∀ I, Indep I → I ⊆ E)
namespace IndepMatroid
/-- An `M : IndepMatroid α` gives a `Matroid α` whose bases are the maximal `M`-independent sets. -/
@[simps] protected def matroid (M : IndepMatroid α) : Matroid α where
E := M.E
Base := (· ∈ maximals (· ⊆ ·) {I | M.Indep I})
Indep := M.Indep
indep_iff' := by
refine fun I ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B,⟨h,_⟩,hIB'⟩ ↦ M.indep_subset h hIB'⟩
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.indep_maximal M.E Subset.rfl I h (M.subset_ground I h)
simp only [mem_maximals_iff, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp] at hB ⊢
exact ⟨B, ⟨hB.1.1,fun J hJ hBJ ↦ hB.2 hJ (hB.1.2.1.trans hBJ) (M.subset_ground J hJ) hBJ⟩,
hB.1.2.1⟩
exists_base := by
obtain ⟨B, ⟨hB,-,-⟩, hB₁⟩ :=
M.indep_maximal M.E rfl.subset ∅ M.indep_empty (empty_subset _)
exact ⟨B, ⟨hB, fun B' hB' h' ↦ hB₁ ⟨hB', empty_subset _,M.subset_ground B' hB'⟩ h'⟩⟩
base_exchange := by
rintro B B' ⟨hB, hBmax⟩ ⟨hB',hB'max⟩ e he
have hnotmax : B \ {e} ∉ maximals (· ⊆ ·) {I | M.Indep I} := by
simp only [mem_maximals_setOf_iff, diff_singleton_subset_iff, not_and, not_forall,
exists_prop, exists_and_left]
exact fun _ ↦ ⟨B, hB, subset_insert _ _, by simpa using he.1⟩
obtain ⟨f,hf,hfB⟩ := M.indep_aug (M.indep_subset hB diff_subset) hnotmax ⟨hB',hB'max⟩
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_and, not_not] at hf
have hfB' : f ∉ B := by (intro hfB; obtain rfl := hf.2 hfB; exact he.2 hf.1)
refine ⟨f, ⟨hf.1, hfB'⟩, by_contra (fun hnot ↦ ?_)⟩
obtain ⟨x,hxB, hind⟩ := M.indep_aug hfB hnot ⟨hB, hBmax⟩
simp only [mem_diff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, not_or, not_and, not_not] at hxB
obtain rfl := hxB.2.2 hxB.1
rw [insert_comm, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem he.1] at hind
exact not_mem_subset (hBmax hind (subset_insert _ _)) hfB' (mem_insert _ _)
maximality := M.indep_maximal
subset_ground B hB := M.subset_ground B hB.1
@[simp] theorem matroid_indep_iff {M : IndepMatroid α} {I : Set α} :
M.matroid.Indep I ↔ M.Indep I := Iff.rfl
/-- An independence predicate satisfying the finite matroid axioms determines a matroid,
provided independence is determined by its behaviour on finite sets.
This fundamentally needs choice, since it can be used to prove that every vector space
has a basis. -/
@[simps E] protected def ofFinitary (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(indep_empty : Indep ∅)
(indep_subset : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep J → I ⊆ J → Indep I)
(indep_aug : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep I → I.Finite → Indep J → J.Finite → I.ncard < J.ncard →
∃ e ∈ J, e ∉ I ∧ Indep (insert e I))
(indep_compact : ∀ I, (∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → Indep J) → Indep I)
(subset_ground : ∀ I, Indep I → I ⊆ E) : IndepMatroid α :=
have htofin : ∀ I e, Indep I → ¬ Indep (insert e I) →
∃ I₀, I₀ ⊆ I ∧ I₀.Finite ∧ ¬ Indep (insert e I₀) := by
by_contra h; push_neg at h
obtain ⟨I, e, -, hIe, h⟩ := h
refine hIe <| indep_compact _ fun J hJss hJfin ↦ ?_
exact indep_subset (h (J \ {e}) (by rwa [diff_subset_iff]) (hJfin.diff _)) (by simp)
IndepMatroid.mk
(E := E)
(Indep := Indep)
(indep_empty := indep_empty)
(indep_subset := indep_subset)
(indep_aug := by
intro I B hI hImax hBmax
simp only [mem_maximals_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop,
exists_and_left, iff_true_intro hI, true_imp_iff] at hImax hBmax
obtain ⟨I', hI', hII', hne⟩ := hImax
obtain ⟨e, heI', heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (hII'.ssubset_of_ne hne)
have hins : Indep (insert e I) := indep_subset hI' (insert_subset heI' hII')
obtain (heB | heB) := em (e ∈ B)
· exact ⟨e, ⟨heB, heI⟩, hins⟩
by_contra hcon; push_neg at hcon
have heBdep : ¬Indep (insert e B) :=
fun hi ↦ heB <| insert_eq_self.1 (hBmax.2 hi (subset_insert _ _)).symm
-- There is a finite subset `B₀` of `B` so that `B₀ + e` is dependent
obtain ⟨B₀, hB₀B, hB₀fin, hB₀e⟩ := htofin B e hBmax.1 heBdep
have hB₀ := indep_subset hBmax.1 hB₀B
-- There is a finite subset `I₀` of `I` so that `I₀` doesn't extend into `B₀`
have hexI₀ : ∃ I₀, I₀ ⊆ I ∧ I₀.Finite ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ B₀ \ I₀ → ¬Indep (insert x I₀) := by
have hchoose : ∀ (b : ↑(B₀ \ I)), ∃ Ib, Ib ⊆ I ∧ Ib.Finite ∧ ¬Indep (insert (b : α) Ib) := by
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩; exact htofin I b hI (hcon b ⟨hB₀B hb.1, hb.2⟩)
choose! f hf using hchoose
have := (hB₀fin.diff I).to_subtype
refine ⟨iUnion f ∪ (B₀ ∩ I),
union_subset (iUnion_subset (fun i ↦ (hf i).1)) inter_subset_right,
(finite_iUnion fun i ↦ (hf i).2.1).union (hB₀fin.subset inter_subset_left),
fun x ⟨hxB₀, hxn⟩ hi ↦ ?_⟩
have hxI : x ∉ I := fun hxI ↦ hxn <| Or.inr ⟨hxB₀, hxI⟩
refine (hf ⟨x, ⟨hxB₀, hxI⟩⟩).2.2 (indep_subset hi <| insert_subset_insert ?_)
apply subset_union_of_subset_left
apply subset_iUnion
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀I, hI₀fin, hI₀⟩ := hexI₀
set E₀ := insert e (I₀ ∪ B₀)
have hE₀fin : E₀.Finite := (hI₀fin.union hB₀fin).insert e
-- Extend `B₀` to a maximal independent subset of `I₀ ∪ B₀ + e`
obtain ⟨J, ⟨hB₀J, hJ, hJss⟩, hJmax⟩ := Finite.exists_maximal_wrt (f := id)
(s := {J | B₀ ⊆ J ∧ Indep J ∧ J ⊆ E₀})
(hE₀fin.finite_subsets.subset (by simp))
⟨B₀, Subset.rfl, hB₀, subset_union_right.trans (subset_insert _ _)⟩
have heI₀ : e ∉ I₀ := not_mem_subset hI₀I heI
have heI₀i : Indep (insert e I₀) := indep_subset hins (insert_subset_insert hI₀I)
have heJ : e ∉ J := fun heJ ↦ hB₀e (indep_subset hJ <| insert_subset heJ hB₀J)
have hJfin := hE₀fin.subset hJss
-- We have `|I₀ + e| ≤ |J|`, since otherwise we could extend the maximal set `J`
have hcard : (insert e I₀).ncard ≤ J.ncard := by
refine not_lt.1 fun hlt ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨f, hfI, hfJ, hfi⟩ := indep_aug hJ hJfin heI₀i (hI₀fin.insert e) hlt
have hfE₀ : f ∈ E₀ := mem_of_mem_of_subset hfI (insert_subset_insert subset_union_left)
refine hfJ (insert_eq_self.1 <| Eq.symm (hJmax _
⟨hB₀J.trans <| subset_insert _ _,hfi,insert_subset hfE₀ hJss⟩ (subset_insert _ _)))
-- But this means `|I₀| < |J|`, and extending `I₀` into `J` gives a contradiction
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem heI₀ hI₀fin, ← Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le] at hcard
obtain ⟨f, hfJ, hfI₀, hfi⟩ := indep_aug (indep_subset hI hI₀I) hI₀fin hJ hJfin hcard
exact hI₀ f ⟨Or.elim (hJss hfJ) (fun hfe ↦ (heJ <| hfe ▸ hfJ).elim) (by aesop), hfI₀⟩ hfi )
(indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I hI hIX
have hzorn := zorn_subset_nonempty {Y | Indep Y ∧ I ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊆ X} ?_ I ⟨hI, Subset.rfl, hIX⟩
· obtain ⟨J, hJ, -, hJmax⟩ := hzorn
exact ⟨J, hJ, fun K hK hJK ↦ (hJmax K hK hJK).subset⟩
refine fun Is hIs hchain ⟨K, hK⟩ ↦ ⟨⋃₀ Is, ⟨?_,?_,?_⟩, fun _ ↦ subset_sUnion_of_mem⟩
· refine indep_compact _ fun J hJ hJfin ↦ ?_
have hchoose : ∀ e, e ∈ J → ∃ I, I ∈ Is ∧ (e : α) ∈ I := fun _ he ↦ mem_sUnion.1 <| hJ he
choose! f hf using hchoose
refine J.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun hJ ↦ hJ ▸ indep_empty) (fun hne ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨x, hxJ, hxmax⟩ := Finite.exists_maximal_wrt f _ hJfin hne
refine indep_subset (hIs (hf x hxJ).1).1 fun y hyJ ↦ ?_
obtain (hle | hle) := hchain.total (hf _ hxJ).1 (hf _ hyJ).1
· rw [hxmax _ hyJ hle]; exact (hf _ hyJ).2
exact hle (hf _ hyJ).2
· exact subset_sUnion_of_subset _ K (hIs hK).2.1 hK
exact sUnion_subset fun X hX ↦ (hIs hX).2.2)
(subset_ground := subset_ground)
@[simp] theorem ofFinitary_indep (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug indep_compact subset_ground : (IndepMatroid.ofFinitary
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug indep_compact subset_ground).Indep = Indep := rfl
instance ofFinitary_finitary (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug indep_compact subset_ground : Finitary
(IndepMatroid.ofFinitary
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug indep_compact subset_ground).matroid :=
⟨by simpa⟩
/-- If there is an absolute upper bound on the size of a set satisfying `P`, then the
maximal subset property always holds. -/
theorem _root_.Matroid.existsMaximalSubsetProperty_of_bdd {P : Set α → Prop}
(hP : ∃ (n : ℕ), ∀ Y, P Y → Y.encard ≤ n) (X : Set α) : ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty P X := by
obtain ⟨n, hP⟩ := hP
rintro I hI hIX
have hfin : Set.Finite (ncard '' {Y | P Y ∧ I ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊆ X}) := by
rw [finite_iff_bddAbove, bddAbove_def]
simp_rw [ENat.le_coe_iff] at hP
use n
rintro x ⟨Y, ⟨hY,-,-⟩, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨n₀, heq, hle⟩ := hP Y hY
rwa [ncard_def, heq, ENat.toNat_coe]
-- have := (hP Y hY).2
obtain ⟨Y, hY, hY'⟩ := Finite.exists_maximal_wrt' ncard _ hfin ⟨I, hI, rfl.subset, hIX⟩
refine ⟨Y, hY, fun J ⟨hJ, hIJ, hJX⟩ (hYJ : Y ⊆ J) ↦ (?_ : J ⊆ Y)⟩
have hJfin := finite_of_encard_le_coe (hP J hJ)
refine (eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le hYJ ?_ hJfin).symm.subset
rw [hY' J ⟨hJ, hIJ, hJX⟩ (ncard_le_ncard hYJ hJfin)]
/-- If there is an absolute upper bound on the size of an independent set, then the maximality axiom
isn't needed to define a matroid by independent sets. -/
@[simps E] protected def ofBdd (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(indep_empty : Indep ∅)
(indep_subset : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep J → I ⊆ J → Indep I)
(indep_aug : ∀⦃I B⦄, Indep I → I ∉ maximals (· ⊆ ·) {I | Indep I} →
B ∈ maximals (· ⊆ ·) {I | Indep I} → ∃ x ∈ B \ I, Indep (insert x I))
(subset_ground : ∀ I, Indep I → I ⊆ E)
(indep_bdd : ∃ (n : ℕ), ∀ I, Indep I → I.encard ≤ n ) : IndepMatroid α where
E := E
Indep := Indep
indep_empty := indep_empty
indep_subset := indep_subset
indep_aug := indep_aug
indep_maximal X _ := Matroid.existsMaximalSubsetProperty_of_bdd indep_bdd X
subset_ground := subset_ground
@[simp] theorem ofBdd_indep (E : Set α) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
subset_ground h_bdd : (IndepMatroid.ofBdd
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground h_bdd).Indep = Indep := rfl
/-- `IndepMatroid.ofBdd` constructs a `FiniteRk` matroid. -/
instance (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop) indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground h_bdd :
FiniteRk (IndepMatroid.ofBdd
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground h_bdd).matroid := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := (IndepMatroid.ofBdd E Indep _ _ _ _ _).matroid.exists_base
refine hB.finiteRk_of_finite ?_
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h_bdd
exact finite_of_encard_le_coe <| hn B (by simpa using hB.indep)
/-- If there is an absolute upper bound on the size of an independent set, then matroids
can be defined using an 'augmentation' axiom similar to the standard definition of
finite matroids for independent sets. -/
protected def ofBddAugment (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(indep_empty : Indep ∅)
(indep_subset : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep J → I ⊆ J → Indep I)
(indep_aug : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep I → Indep J → I.encard < J.encard →
∃ e ∈ J, e ∉ I ∧ Indep (insert e I))
(indep_bdd : ∃ (n : ℕ), ∀ I, Indep I → I.encard ≤ n )
(subset_ground : ∀ I, Indep I → I ⊆ E) : IndepMatroid α :=
IndepMatroid.ofBdd (E := E) (Indep := Indep)
(indep_empty := indep_empty)
(indep_subset := indep_subset)
(indep_aug := by
simp_rw [mem_maximals_setOf_iff, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, mem_diff,
and_imp, and_assoc]
rintro I B hI hImax hB hBmax
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ, hne⟩ := hImax hI
obtain ⟨n, h_bdd⟩ := indep_bdd
have hlt : I.encard < J.encard :=
(finite_of_encard_le_coe (h_bdd J hJ)).encard_lt_encard (hIJ.ssubset_of_ne hne)
have hle : J.encard ≤ B.encard := by
refine le_of_not_lt (fun hlt' ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ := indep_aug hB hJ hlt'
rw [hBmax he.2.2 (subset_insert _ _)] at he
exact he.2.1 (mem_insert _ _)
exact indep_aug hI hB (hlt.trans_le hle))
(indep_bdd := indep_bdd) (subset_ground := subset_ground)
@[simp] theorem ofBddAugment_E (E : Set α) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
indep_bdd subset_ground : (IndepMatroid.ofBddAugment
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug indep_bdd subset_ground).E = E := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofBddAugment_indep (E : Set α) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
indep_bdd subset_ground : (IndepMatroid.ofBddAugment
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug indep_bdd subset_ground).Indep = Indep := rfl
instance ofBddAugment_finiteRk (E : Set α) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
indep_bdd subset_ground : FiniteRk (IndepMatroid.ofBddAugment
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug indep_bdd subset_ground).matroid := by
rw [IndepMatroid.ofBddAugment]
infer_instance
/-- If `E` is finite, then any collection of subsets of `E` satisfying
the usual independence axioms determines a matroid -/
protected def ofFinite {E : Set α} (hE : E.Finite) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(indep_empty : Indep ∅)
(indep_subset : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep J → I ⊆ J → Indep I)
(indep_aug :
∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep I → Indep J → I.ncard < J.ncard → ∃ e ∈ J, e ∉ I ∧ Indep (insert e I))
(subset_ground : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I → I ⊆ E) : IndepMatroid α :=
IndepMatroid.ofBddAugment (E := E) (Indep := Indep) (indep_empty := indep_empty)
(indep_subset := indep_subset)
(indep_aug := by
refine fun {I J} hI hJ hIJ ↦ indep_aug hI hJ ?_
rwa [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℕ∞), (hE.subset (subset_ground hJ)).cast_ncard_eq,
(hE.subset (subset_ground hI)).cast_ncard_eq] )
(indep_bdd := ⟨E.ncard, fun I hI ↦ by
rw [hE.cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_le_card <| subset_ground hI ⟩)
(subset_ground := subset_ground)
@[simp] theorem ofFinite_E {E : Set α} hE Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground :
(IndepMatroid.ofFinite
(hE : E.Finite) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground).E = E := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofFinite_indep {E : Set α} hE Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
subset_ground : (IndepMatroid.ofFinite
(hE : E.Finite) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground).Indep = Indep := rfl
instance ofFinite_finite {E : Set α} hE Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground :
(IndepMatroid.ofFinite
(hE : E.Finite) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground).matroid.Finite :=
⟨hE⟩
/-- An independence predicate on `Finset α` that obeys the finite matroid axioms determines a
finitary matroid on `α`. -/
protected def ofFinset [DecidableEq α] (E : Set α) (Indep : Finset α → Prop)
(indep_empty : Indep ∅)
(indep_subset : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep J → I ⊆ J → Indep I)
(indep_aug : ∀ ⦃I J⦄, Indep I → Indep J → I.card < J.card → ∃ e ∈ J, e ∉ I ∧ Indep (insert e I))
(subset_ground : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I → (I : Set α) ⊆ E) : IndepMatroid α :=
IndepMatroid.ofFinitary
(E := E)
(Indep := (fun I ↦ (∀ (J : Finset α), (J : Set α) ⊆ I → Indep J)))
(indep_empty := by simpa [subset_empty_iff])
(indep_subset := ( fun I J hJ hIJ K hKI ↦ hJ _ (hKI.trans hIJ) ))
(indep_aug := by
intro I J hI hIfin hJ hJfin hIJ
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hIfin, ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hJfin] at hIJ
have aug := indep_aug (hI _ (by simp [Subset.rfl])) (hJ _ (by simp [Subset.rfl])) hIJ
simp only [Finite.mem_toFinset] at aug
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heI, hi⟩ := aug
exact ⟨e, heJ, heI, fun K hK ↦ indep_subset hi <| Finset.coe_subset.1 (by simpa)⟩ )
(indep_compact := fun I h J hJ ↦ h _ hJ J.finite_toSet _ Subset.rfl )
(subset_ground := fun I hI x hxI ↦ by simpa using subset_ground <| hI {x} (by simpa) )
@[simp] theorem ofFinset_E [DecidableEq α] (E : Set α) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
subset_ground : (IndepMatroid.ofFinset
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground).E = E := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofFinset_indep [DecidableEq α] (E : Set α) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
subset_ground {I : Finset α} : (IndepMatroid.ofFinset
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground).Indep I ↔ Indep I := by
simp only [IndepMatroid.ofFinset, ofFinitary_indep, Finset.coe_subset]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ h _ Subset.rfl, fun h J hJI ↦ indep_subset h hJI⟩
/-- This can't be `@[simp]`, because it would cause the more useful
`Matroid.ofIndepFinset_apply` not to be in simp normal form. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/IndepAxioms.lean | 423 | 427 | theorem ofFinset_indep' [DecidableEq α] (E : Set α) Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug
subset_ground {I : Set α} : (IndepMatroid.ofFinset
E Indep indep_empty indep_subset indep_aug subset_ground).Indep I ↔
∀ (J : Finset α), (J : Set α) ⊆ I → Indep J := by |
simp only [IndepMatroid.ofFinset, ofFinitary_indep]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_mod self_sub_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ico_div_zsmul toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ioc_div_zsmul toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ico_mod toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ioc_mod toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_iff toIcoMod_eq_iff
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_iff toIocMod_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_left toIcoDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_left toIocDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_left toIcoMod_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_left toIocMod_apply_left
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_right toIcoDiv_apply_right
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_right toIocDiv_apply_right
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 222 | 224 | theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by |
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# The complex `log` function
Basic properties, relationship with `exp`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped Real Topology ComplexConjugate
/-- Inverse of the `exp` function. Returns values such that `(log x).im > - π` and `(log x).im ≤ π`.
`log 0 = 0`-/
-- Porting note: @[pp_nodot] does not exist in mathlib4
noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ :=
x.abs.log + arg x * I
#align complex.log Complex.log
theorem log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_re Complex.log_re
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Log.lean | 36 | 36 | theorem log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by | simp [log]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.Differentiation
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
#align_import measure_theory.covering.besicovitch from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5f6e827d81dfbeb6151d7016586ceeb0099b9655"
/-!
# Besicovitch covering theorems
The topological Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, in a nice metric space, there exists a
number `N` such that, from any family of balls with bounded radii, one can extract `N` families,
each made of disjoint balls, covering together all the centers of the initial family.
By "nice metric space", we mean a technical property stated as follows: there exists no satellite
configuration of `N + 1` points (with a given parameter `τ > 1`). Such a configuration is a family
of `N + 1` balls, where the first `N` balls all intersect the last one, but none of them contains
the center of another one and their radii are controlled. This property is for instance
satisfied by finite-dimensional real vector spaces.
In this file, we prove the topological Besicovitch covering theorem,
in `Besicovitch.exist_disjoint_covering_families`.
The measurable Besicovitch theorem ensures that, in the same class of metric spaces, if at every
point one considers a class of balls of arbitrarily small radii, called admissible balls, then
one can cover almost all the space by a family of disjoint admissible balls.
It is deduced from the topological Besicovitch theorem, and proved
in `Besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
This implies that balls of small radius form a Vitali family in such spaces. Therefore, theorems
on differentiation of measures hold as a consequence of general results. We restate them in this
context to make them more easily usable.
## Main definitions and results
* `SatelliteConfig α N τ` is the type of all satellite configurations of `N + 1` points
in the metric space `α`, with parameter `τ`.
* `HasBesicovitchCovering` is a class recording that there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there is no satellite configuration of `N + 1` points with parameter `τ`.
* `exist_disjoint_covering_families` is the topological Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls one can extract finitely many disjoint subfamilies covering the same set.
* `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering` is the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls with arbitrarily small radii at every point, one can extract countably many
disjoint balls covering almost all the space. While the value of `N` is relevant for the precise
statement of the topological Besicovitch theorem, it becomes irrelevant for the measurable one.
Therefore, this statement is expressed using the `Prop`-valued
typeclass `HasBesicovitchCovering`.
We also restate the following specialized versions of general theorems on differentiation of
measures:
* `Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv` ensures that `ρ (closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)` tends
almost surely to the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ` at `x`.
* `Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that almost every point in an arbitrary set `s`
is a Lebesgue density point, i.e., `μ (s ∩ closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)` tends to `1` as
`r` tends to `0`. A stronger version for measurable sets is given in
`Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurableSet`.
## Implementation
#### Sketch of proof of the topological Besicovitch theorem:
We choose balls in a greedy way. First choose a ball with maximal radius (or rather, since there
is no guarantee the maximal radius is realized, a ball with radius within a factor `τ` of the
supremum). Then, remove all balls whose center is covered by the first ball, and choose among the
remaining ones a ball with radius close to maximum. Go on forever until there is no available
center (this is a transfinite induction in general).
Then define inductively a coloring of the balls. A ball will be of color `i` if it intersects
already chosen balls of color `0`, ..., `i - 1`, but none of color `i`. In this way, balls of the
same color form a disjoint family, and the space is covered by the families of the different colors.
The nontrivial part is to show that at most `N` colors are used. If one needs `N + 1` colors,
consider the first time this happens. Then the corresponding ball intersects `N` balls of the
different colors. Moreover, the inductive construction ensures that the radii of all the balls are
controlled: they form a satellite configuration with `N + 1` balls (essentially by definition of
satellite configurations). Since we assume that there are no such configurations, this is a
contradiction.
#### Sketch of proof of the measurable Besicovitch theorem:
From the topological Besicovitch theorem, one can find a disjoint countable family of balls
covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the space. Taking a large enough finite subset of these
balls, one gets the same property for finitely many balls. Their union is closed. Therefore, any
point in the complement has around it an admissible ball not intersecting these finitely many balls.
Applying again the topological Besicovitch theorem, one extracts from these a disjoint countable
subfamily covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the remaining points, and then even a disjoint
finite subfamily. Then one goes on again and again, covering at each step a positive proportion of
the remaining points, while remaining disjoint from the already chosen balls. The union of all these
balls is the desired almost everywhere covering.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open Metric Set Filter Fin MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology Classical ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal
/-!
### Satellite configurations
-/
/-- A satellite configuration is a configuration of `N+1` points that shows up in the inductive
construction for the Besicovitch covering theorem. It depends on some parameter `τ ≥ 1`.
This is a family of balls (indexed by `i : Fin N.succ`, with center `c i` and radius `r i`) such
that the last ball intersects all the other balls (condition `inter`),
and given any two balls there is an order between them, ensuring that the first ball does not
contain the center of the other one, and the radius of the second ball can not be larger than
the radius of the first ball (up to a factor `τ`). This order corresponds to the order of choice
in the inductive construction: otherwise, the second ball would have been chosen before.
This is the condition `h`.
Finally, the last ball is chosen after all the other ones, meaning that `h` can be strengthened
by keeping only one side of the alternative in `hlast`.
-/
structure Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig (α : Type*) [MetricSpace α] (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ) where
c : Fin N.succ → α
r : Fin N.succ → ℝ
rpos : ∀ i, 0 < r i
h : Pairwise fun i j =>
r i ≤ dist (c i) (c j) ∧ r j ≤ τ * r i ∨ r j ≤ dist (c j) (c i) ∧ r i ≤ τ * r j
hlast : ∀ i < last N, r i ≤ dist (c i) (c (last N)) ∧ r (last N) ≤ τ * r i
inter : ∀ i < last N, dist (c i) (c (last N)) ≤ r i + r (last N)
#align besicovitch.satellite_config Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.c Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.c
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.r Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.rpos Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.rpos
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.h Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.h
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.hlast Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.hlast
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.inter Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.inter
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r`. -/
@[positivity Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r _ _]
def evalBesicovitchSatelliteConfigR : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r $β $inst $N $τ $self $i) =>
assertInstancesCommute
return .positive q(Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.rpos $self $i)
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-- A metric space has the Besicovitch covering property if there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there are no satellite configuration of parameter `τ` with `N+1` points. This is the condition that
guarantees that the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem holds. It is satisfied by
finite-dimensional real vector spaces. -/
class HasBesicovitchCovering (α : Type*) [MetricSpace α] : Prop where
no_satelliteConfig : ∃ (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ), 1 < τ ∧ IsEmpty (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α N τ)
#align has_besicovitch_covering HasBesicovitchCovering
#align has_besicovitch_covering.no_satellite_config HasBesicovitchCovering.no_satelliteConfig
/-- There is always a satellite configuration with a single point. -/
instance Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.instInhabited {α : Type*} {τ : ℝ}
[Inhabited α] [MetricSpace α] : Inhabited (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α 0 τ) :=
⟨{ c := default
r := fun _ => 1
rpos := fun _ => zero_lt_one
h := fun i j hij => (hij (Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i j)).elim
hlast := fun i hi => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i (last 0)] at hi; exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim
inter := fun i hi => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i (last 0)] at hi; exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim }⟩
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.inhabited Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.instInhabited
namespace Besicovitch
namespace SatelliteConfig
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig α N τ)
theorem inter' (i : Fin N.succ) : dist (a.c i) (a.c (last N)) ≤ a.r i + a.r (last N) := by
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with (H | H)
· exact a.inter i H
· have I : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H
have := (a.rpos (last N)).le
simp only [I, add_nonneg this this, dist_self]
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.inter' Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.inter'
theorem hlast' (i : Fin N.succ) (h : 1 ≤ τ) : a.r (last N) ≤ τ * a.r i := by
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with (H | H)
· exact (a.hlast i H).2
· have : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H
rw [this]
exact le_mul_of_one_le_left (a.rpos _).le h
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.hlast' Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.hlast'
end SatelliteConfig
/-! ### Extracting disjoint subfamilies from a ball covering -/
/-- A ball package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii. -/
structure BallPackage (β : Type*) (α : Type*) where
c : β → α
r : β → ℝ
rpos : ∀ b, 0 < r b
r_bound : ℝ
r_le : ∀ b, r b ≤ r_bound
#align besicovitch.ball_package Besicovitch.BallPackage
#align besicovitch.ball_package.c Besicovitch.BallPackage.c
#align besicovitch.ball_package.r Besicovitch.BallPackage.r
#align besicovitch.ball_package.rpos Besicovitch.BallPackage.rpos
#align besicovitch.ball_package.r_bound Besicovitch.BallPackage.r_bound
#align besicovitch.ball_package.r_le Besicovitch.BallPackage.r_le
/-- The ball package made of unit balls. -/
def unitBallPackage (α : Type*) : BallPackage α α where
c := id
r _ := 1
rpos _ := zero_lt_one
r_bound := 1
r_le _ := le_rfl
#align besicovitch.unit_ball_package Besicovitch.unitBallPackage
instance BallPackage.instInhabited (α : Type*) : Inhabited (BallPackage α α) :=
⟨unitBallPackage α⟩
#align besicovitch.ball_package.inhabited Besicovitch.BallPackage.instInhabited
/-- A Besicovitch tau-package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii,
together with enough data to proceed with the Besicovitch greedy algorithm. We register this in
a single structure to make sure that all our constructions in this algorithm only depend on
one variable. -/
structure TauPackage (β : Type*) (α : Type*) extends BallPackage β α where
τ : ℝ
one_lt_tau : 1 < τ
#align besicovitch.tau_package Besicovitch.TauPackage
#align besicovitch.tau_package.τ Besicovitch.TauPackage.τ
#align besicovitch.tau_package.one_lt_tau Besicovitch.TauPackage.one_lt_tau
instance TauPackage.instInhabited (α : Type*) : Inhabited (TauPackage α α) :=
⟨{ unitBallPackage α with
τ := 2
one_lt_tau := one_lt_two }⟩
#align besicovitch.tau_package.inhabited Besicovitch.TauPackage.instInhabited
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {β : Type u}
namespace TauPackage
variable [Nonempty β] (p : TauPackage β α)
/-- Choose inductively large balls with centers that are not contained in the union of already
chosen balls. This is a transfinite induction. -/
noncomputable def index : Ordinal.{u} → β
| i =>
-- `Z` is the set of points that are covered by already constructed balls
let Z := ⋃ j : { j // j < i }, ball (p.c (index j)) (p.r (index j))
-- `R` is the supremum of the radii of balls with centers not in `Z`
let R := iSup fun b : { b : β // p.c b ∉ Z } => p.r b
-- return an index `b` for which the center `c b` is not in `Z`, and the radius is at
-- least `R / τ`, if such an index exists (and garbage otherwise).
Classical.epsilon fun b : β => p.c b ∉ Z ∧ R ≤ p.τ * p.r b
termination_by i => i
decreasing_by exact j.2
#align besicovitch.tau_package.index Besicovitch.TauPackage.index
/-- The set of points that are covered by the union of balls selected at steps `< i`. -/
def iUnionUpTo (i : Ordinal.{u}) : Set α :=
⋃ j : { j // j < i }, ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
#align besicovitch.tau_package.Union_up_to Besicovitch.TauPackage.iUnionUpTo
theorem monotone_iUnionUpTo : Monotone p.iUnionUpTo := by
intro i j hij
simp only [iUnionUpTo]
exact iUnion_mono' fun r => ⟨⟨r, r.2.trans_le hij⟩, Subset.rfl⟩
#align besicovitch.tau_package.monotone_Union_up_to Besicovitch.TauPackage.monotone_iUnionUpTo
/-- Supremum of the radii of balls whose centers are not yet covered at step `i`. -/
def R (i : Ordinal.{u}) : ℝ :=
iSup fun b : { b : β // p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i } => p.r b
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align besicovitch.tau_package.R Besicovitch.TauPackage.R
/-- Group the balls into disjoint families, by assigning to a ball the smallest color for which
it does not intersect any already chosen ball of this color. -/
noncomputable def color : Ordinal.{u} → ℕ
| i =>
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < i })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty), {color j}
sInf (univ \ A)
termination_by i => i
decreasing_by exact j.2
#align besicovitch.tau_package.color Besicovitch.TauPackage.color
/-- `p.lastStep` is the first ordinal where the construction stops making sense, i.e., `f` returns
garbage since there is no point left to be chosen. We will only use ordinals before this step. -/
def lastStep : Ordinal.{u} :=
sInf {i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}
#align besicovitch.tau_package.last_step Besicovitch.TauPackage.lastStep
theorem lastStep_nonempty :
{i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}.Nonempty := by
by_contra h
suffices H : Function.Injective p.index from not_injective_of_ordinal p.index H
intro x y hxy
wlog x_le_y : x ≤ y generalizing x y
· exact (this hxy.symm (le_of_not_le x_le_y)).symm
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le x_le_y with (rfl | H); · rfl
simp only [nonempty_def, not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_setOf_eq,
not_forall] at h
specialize h y
have A : p.c (p.index y) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo y := by
have :
p.index y =
Classical.epsilon fun b : β => p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo y ∧ p.R y ≤ p.τ * p.r b := by
rw [TauPackage.index]; rfl
rw [this]
exact (Classical.epsilon_spec h).1
simp only [iUnionUpTo, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_le,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at A
specialize A x H
simp? [hxy] at A says simp only [hxy, mem_ball, dist_self, not_lt] at A
exact (lt_irrefl _ ((p.rpos (p.index y)).trans_le A)).elim
#align besicovitch.tau_package.last_step_nonempty Besicovitch.TauPackage.lastStep_nonempty
/-- Every point is covered by chosen balls, before `p.lastStep`. -/
theorem mem_iUnionUpTo_lastStep (x : β) : p.c x ∈ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep := by
have A : ∀ z : β, p.c z ∈ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep ∨ p.τ * p.r z < p.R p.lastStep := by
have : p.lastStep ∈ {i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b} :=
csInf_mem p.lastStep_nonempty
simpa only [not_exists, mem_setOf_eq, not_and_or, not_le, not_not_mem]
by_contra h
rcases A x with (H | H); · exact h H
have Rpos : 0 < p.R p.lastStep := by
apply lt_trans (mul_pos (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau) (p.rpos _)) H
have B : p.τ⁻¹ * p.R p.lastStep < p.R p.lastStep := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul (p.R p.lastStep)]
exact mul_lt_mul (inv_lt_one p.one_lt_tau) le_rfl Rpos zero_le_one
obtain ⟨y, hy1, hy2⟩ : ∃ y, p.c y ∉ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep ∧ p.τ⁻¹ * p.R p.lastStep < p.r y := by
have := exists_lt_of_lt_csSup ?_ B
· simpa only [exists_prop, mem_range, exists_exists_and_eq_and, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [← image_univ, image_nonempty]
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, mem_univ _⟩
rcases A y with (Hy | Hy)
· exact hy1 Hy
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul] at hy2
have := (div_le_iff' (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau)).1 hy2.le
exact lt_irrefl _ (Hy.trans_le this)
#align besicovitch.tau_package.mem_Union_up_to_last_step Besicovitch.TauPackage.mem_iUnionUpTo_lastStep
/-- If there are no configurations of satellites with `N+1` points, one never uses more than `N`
distinct families in the Besicovitch inductive construction. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Besicovitch.lean | 362 | 478 | theorem color_lt {i : Ordinal.{u}} (hi : i < p.lastStep) {N : ℕ}
(hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N p.τ)) : p.color i < N := by |
/- By contradiction, consider the first ordinal `i` for which one would have `p.color i = N`.
Choose for each `k < N` a ball with color `k` that intersects the ball at color `i`
(there is such a ball, otherwise one would have used the color `k` and not `N`).
Then this family of `N+1` balls forms a satellite configuration, which is forbidden by
the assumption `hN`. -/
induction' i using Ordinal.induction with i IH
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < i })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty),
{p.color j}
have color_i : p.color i = sInf (univ \ A) := by rw [color]
rw [color_i]
have N_mem : N ∈ univ \ A := by
simp only [A, not_exists, true_and_iff, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff,
mem_closedBall, not_and, mem_univ, mem_diff, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
intro j ji _
exact (IH j ji (ji.trans hi)).ne'
suffices sInf (univ \ A) ≠ N by
rcases (csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow (univ \ A)) N_mem).lt_or_eq with (H | H)
· exact H
· exact (this H).elim
intro Inf_eq_N
have :
∀ k, k < N → ∃ j, j < i ∧
(closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty ∧ k = p.color j := by
intro k hk
rw [← Inf_eq_N] at hk
have : k ∈ A := by
simpa only [true_and_iff, mem_univ, Classical.not_not, mem_diff] using
Nat.not_mem_of_lt_sInf hk
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right,
and_assoc] at this
simpa only [A, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, mem_closedBall, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
choose! g hg using this
-- Choose for each `k < N` an ordinal `G k < i` giving a ball of color `k` intersecting
-- the last ball.
let G : ℕ → Ordinal := fun n => if n = N then i else g n
have color_G : ∀ n, n ≤ N → p.color (G n) = n := by
intro n hn
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· simp only [G]; simp only [color_i, Inf_eq_N, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
· simp only [G]; simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).right.right.symm, if_false]
have G_lt_last : ∀ n, n ≤ N → G n < p.lastStep := by
intro n hn
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· simp only [G]; simp only [hi, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
· simp only [G]; simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).left.trans hi, if_false]
have fGn :
∀ n, n ≤ N →
p.c (p.index (G n)) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G n)) := by
intro n hn
have :
p.index (G n) =
Classical.epsilon fun t => p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t := by
rw [index]; rfl
rw [this]
have : ∃ t, p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t := by
simpa only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall] using
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (G_lt_last n hn) (OrderBot.bddBelow _)
exact Classical.epsilon_spec this
-- the balls with indices `G k` satisfy the characteristic property of satellite configurations.
have Gab :
∀ a b : Fin (Nat.succ N),
G a < G b →
p.r (p.index (G a)) ≤ dist (p.c (p.index (G a))) (p.c (p.index (G b))) ∧
p.r (p.index (G b)) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G a)) := by
intro a b G_lt
have ha : (a : ℕ) ≤ N := Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2
have hb : (b : ℕ) ≤ N := Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2
constructor
· have := (fGn b hb).1
simp only [iUnionUpTo, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_le,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at this
simpa only [dist_comm, mem_ball, not_lt] using this (G a) G_lt
· apply le_trans _ (fGn a ha).2
have B : p.c (p.index (G b)) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) := by
intro H; exact (fGn b hb).1 (p.monotone_iUnionUpTo G_lt.le H)
let b' : { t // p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) } := ⟨p.index (G b), B⟩
apply @le_ciSup _ _ _ (fun t : { t // p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) } => p.r t) _ b'
refine ⟨p.r_bound, fun t ht => ?_⟩
simp only [exists_prop, mem_range, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at ht
rcases ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [← hu.2]
exact p.r_le _
-- therefore, one may use them to construct a satellite configuration with `N+1` points
let sc : SatelliteConfig α N p.τ :=
{ c := fun k => p.c (p.index (G k))
r := fun k => p.r (p.index (G k))
rpos := fun k => p.rpos (p.index (G k))
h := by
intro a b a_ne_b
wlog G_le : G a ≤ G b generalizing a b
· exact (this a_ne_b.symm (le_of_not_le G_le)).symm
have G_lt : G a < G b := by
rcases G_le.lt_or_eq with (H | H); · exact H
have A : (a : ℕ) ≠ b := Fin.val_injective.ne a_ne_b
rw [← color_G a (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2), ← color_G b (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2), H] at A
exact (A rfl).elim
exact Or.inl (Gab a b G_lt)
hlast := by
intro a ha
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha
have : G a < G (Fin.last N) := by dsimp; simp [G, I.ne, (hg a I).1]
exact Gab _ _ this
inter := by
intro a ha
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha
have J : G (Fin.last N) = i := by dsimp; simp only [G, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
have K : G a = g a := by dsimp [G]; simp [I.ne, (hg a I).1]
convert dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall (hg _ I).2.1 }
-- this is a contradiction
exact hN.false sc
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Bilinear
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.SuppressCompilation
#align_import linear_algebra.tensor_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88fcdc3da43943f5b01925deddaa5bf0c0e85e4e"
/-!
# Tensor product of modules over commutative semirings.
This file constructs the tensor product of modules over commutative semirings. Given a semiring
`R` and modules over it `M` and `N`, the standard construction of the tensor product is
`TensorProduct R M N`. It is also a module over `R`.
It comes with a canonical bilinear map `M → N → TensorProduct R M N`.
Given any bilinear map `M → N → P`, there is a unique linear map `TensorProduct R M N → P` whose
composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → TensorProduct R M N` is the given bilinear
map `M → N → P`.
We start by proving basic lemmas about bilinear maps.
## Notations
This file uses the localized notation `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N` for `TensorProduct R M N`, as well
as `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n` for `TensorProduct.tmul R m n`.
## Tags
bilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R' : Type*} [Monoid R']
variable {R'' : Type*} [Semiring R'']
variable {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} {Q : Type*} {S : Type*} {T : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [AddCommMonoid Q] [AddCommMonoid S] [AddCommMonoid T]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q] [Module R S] [Module R T]
variable [DistribMulAction R' M]
variable [Module R'' M]
variable (M N)
namespace TensorProduct
section
variable (R)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (M × N)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → Prop
| of_zero_left : ∀ n : N, Eqv (.of (0, n)) 0
| of_zero_right : ∀ m : M, Eqv (.of (m, 0)) 0
| of_add_left : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (m₁, n) + .of (m₂, n)) (.of (m₁ + m₂, n))
| of_add_right : ∀ (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), Eqv (.of (m, n₁) + .of (m, n₂)) (.of (m, n₁ + n₂))
| of_smul : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (r • m, n)) (.of (m, r • n))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
#align tensor_product.eqv TensorProduct.Eqv
end
end TensorProduct
variable (R)
/-- The tensor product of two modules `M` and `N` over the same commutative semiring `R`.
The localized notations are `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N`, accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def TensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).Quotient
#align tensor_product TensorProduct
variable {R}
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc TensorProduct] scoped[TensorProduct] infixl:100 " ⊗ " => TensorProduct _
@[inherit_doc] scoped[TensorProduct] notation:100 M " ⊗[" R "] " N:100 => TensorProduct R M N
namespace TensorProduct
section Module
protected instance add : Add (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).hasAdd
instance addZeroClass : AddZeroClass (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
/- The `toAdd` field is given explicitly as `TensorProduct.add` for performance reasons.
This avoids any need to unfold `Con.addMonoid` when the type checker is checking
that instance diagrams commute -/
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _ }
instance addSemigroup : AddSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _ }
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
add_comm := fun x y =>
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (R) {M N}
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. The localized notations are `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n`,
accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def tmul (m : M) (n : N) : M ⊗[R] N :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (m, n)
#align tensor_product.tmul TensorProduct.tmul
variable {R}
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
infixl:100 " ⊗ₜ " => tmul _
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
notation:100 x " ⊗ₜ[" R "] " y:100 => tmul R x y
-- Porting note: make the arguments of induction_on explicit
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : M ⊗[R] N → Prop} (z : M ⊗[R] N)
(zero : motive 0)
(tmul : ∀ x y, motive <| x ⊗ₜ[R] y)
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) : motive z :=
AddCon.induction_on z fun x =>
FreeAddMonoid.recOn x zero fun ⟨m, n⟩ y ih => by
rw [AddCon.coe_add]
exact add _ _ (tmul ..) ih
#align tensor_product.induction_on TensorProduct.induction_on
/-- Lift an `R`-balanced map to the tensor product.
A map `f : M →+ N →+ P` additive in both components is `R`-balanced, or middle linear with respect
to `R`, if scalar multiplication in either argument is equivalent, `f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)`.
Note that strictly the first action should be a right-action by `R`, but for now `R` is commutative
so it doesn't matter. -/
-- TODO: use this to implement `lift` and `SMul.aux`. For now we do not do this as it causes
-- performance issues elsewhere.
def liftAddHom (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) :
M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift (fun mn : M × N => f mn.1 mn.2)) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero,
AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add,
AddMonoidHom.add_apply]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, hf]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem liftAddHom_tmul (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) (m : M) (n : N) :
liftAddHom f hf (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
variable (M)
@[simp]
theorem zero_tmul (n : N) : (0 : M) ⊗ₜ[R] n = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_left _
#align tensor_product.zero_tmul TensorProduct.zero_tmul
variable {M}
theorem add_tmul (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : (m₁ + m₂) ⊗ₜ n = m₁ ⊗ₜ n + m₂ ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_left _ _ _
#align tensor_product.add_tmul TensorProduct.add_tmul
variable (N)
@[simp]
theorem tmul_zero (m : M) : m ⊗ₜ[R] (0 : N) = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_right _
#align tensor_product.tmul_zero TensorProduct.tmul_zero
variable {N}
theorem tmul_add (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N) : m ⊗ₜ (n₁ + n₂) = m ⊗ₜ n₁ + m ⊗ₜ[R] n₂ :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_right _ _ _
#align tensor_product.tmul_add TensorProduct.tmul_add
instance uniqueLeft [Subsingleton M] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0, zero_tmul]; rfl) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
instance uniqueRight [Subsingleton N] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim y 0, tmul_zero]; rfl) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
section
variable (R R' M N)
/-- A typeclass for `SMul` structures which can be moved across a tensor product.
This typeclass is generated automatically from an `IsScalarTower` instance, but exists so that
we can also add an instance for `AddCommGroup.intModule`, allowing `z •` to be moved even if
`R` does not support negation.
Note that `Module R' (M ⊗[R] N)` is available even without this typeclass on `R'`; it's only
needed if `TensorProduct.smul_tmul`, `TensorProduct.smul_tmul'`, or `TensorProduct.tmul_smul` is
used.
-/
class CompatibleSMul [DistribMulAction R' N] : Prop where
smul_tmul : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), (r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n)
#align tensor_product.compatible_smul TensorProduct.CompatibleSMul
end
/-- Note that this provides the default `compatible_smul R R M N` instance through
`IsScalarTower.left`. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompatibleSMul.isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M]
[DistribMulAction R' N] [IsScalarTower R' R N] : CompatibleSMul R R' M N :=
⟨fun r m n => by
conv_lhs => rw [← one_smul R m]
conv_rhs => rw [← one_smul R n]
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc]
exact Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _⟩
#align tensor_product.compatible_smul.is_scalar_tower TensorProduct.CompatibleSMul.isScalarTower
/-- `smul` can be moved from one side of the product to the other . -/
theorem smul_tmul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
(r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n) :=
CompatibleSMul.smul_tmul _ _ _
#align tensor_product.smul_tmul TensorProduct.smul_tmul
-- Porting note: This is added as a local instance for `SMul.aux`.
-- For some reason type-class inference in Lean 3 unfolded this definition.
private def addMonoidWithWrongNSMul : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with }
attribute [local instance] addMonoidWithWrongNSMul in
/-- Auxiliary function to defining scalar multiplication on tensor product. -/
def SMul.aux {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) →+ M ⊗[R] N :=
FreeAddMonoid.lift fun p : M × N => (r • p.1) ⊗ₜ p.2
#align tensor_product.smul.aux TensorProduct.SMul.aux
theorem SMul.aux_of {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
SMul.aux r (.of (m, n)) = (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.smul.aux_of TensorProduct.SMul.aux_of
variable [SMulCommClass R R' M] [SMulCommClass R R'' M]
/-- Given two modules over a commutative semiring `R`, if one of the factors carries a
(distributive) action of a second type of scalars `R'`, which commutes with the action of `R`, then
the tensor product (over `R`) carries an action of `R'`.
This instance defines this `R'` action in the case that it is the left module which has the `R'`
action. Two natural ways in which this situation arises are:
* Extension of scalars
* A tensor product of a group representation with a module not carrying an action
Note that in the special case that `R = R'`, since `R` is commutative, we just get the usual scalar
action on a tensor product of two modules. This special case is important enough that, for
performance reasons, we define it explicitly below. -/
instance leftHasSMul : SMul R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun r =>
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (SMul.aux r : _ →+ M ⊗[R] N) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, smul_zero, zero_tmul]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, tmul_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, smul_add, add_tmul]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, tmul_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [SMul.aux_of, SMul.aux_of, ← smul_comm, smul_tmul]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]⟩
#align tensor_product.left_has_smul TensorProduct.leftHasSMul
instance : SMul R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftHasSMul
protected theorem smul_zero (r : R') : r • (0 : M ⊗[R] N) = 0 :=
AddMonoidHom.map_zero _
#align tensor_product.smul_zero TensorProduct.smul_zero
protected theorem smul_add (r : R') (x y : M ⊗[R] N) : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
#align tensor_product.smul_add TensorProduct.smul_add
protected theorem zero_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (0 : R'') • x = 0 :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, zero_smul, zero_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_zero]
#align tensor_product.zero_smul TensorProduct.zero_smul
protected theorem one_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (1 : R') • x = x :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, one_smul])
fun x y ihx ihy => by rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy]
#align tensor_product.one_smul TensorProduct.one_smul
protected theorem add_smul (r s : R'') (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero, add_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, add_smul, add_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy, add_add_add_comm]
#align tensor_product.add_smul TensorProduct.add_smul
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addZeroClass _ _ with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
toZero := (TensorProduct.addZeroClass _ _).toZero
nsmul := fun n v => n • v
nsmul_zero := by simp [TensorProduct.zero_smul]
nsmul_succ := by simp only [TensorProduct.one_smul, TensorProduct.add_smul, add_comm,
forall_const] }
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addCommSemigroup _ _ with
toAddMonoid := TensorProduct.addMonoid }
instance leftDistribMulAction : DistribMulAction R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
{ smul_add := fun r x y => TensorProduct.smul_add r x y
mul_smul := fun r s x =>
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, mul_smul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy]
one_smul := TensorProduct.one_smul
smul_zero := TensorProduct.smul_zero }
#align tensor_product.left_distrib_mul_action TensorProduct.leftDistribMulAction
instance : DistribMulAction R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftDistribMulAction
theorem smul_tmul' (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) : r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.smul_tmul' TensorProduct.smul_tmul'
@[simp]
theorem tmul_smul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (x : M) (y : N) :
x ⊗ₜ (r • y) = r • x ⊗ₜ[R] y :=
(smul_tmul _ _ _).symm
#align tensor_product.tmul_smul TensorProduct.tmul_smul
theorem smul_tmul_smul (r s : R) (m : M) (n : N) : (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] (s • n) = (r * s) • m ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul, mul_smul]
#align tensor_product.smul_tmul_smul TensorProduct.smul_tmul_smul
instance leftModule : Module R'' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ add_smul := TensorProduct.add_smul
zero_smul := TensorProduct.zero_smul }
#align tensor_product.left_module TensorProduct.leftModule
instance : Module R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftModule
instance [Module R''ᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar R'' M] : IsCentralScalar R'' (M ⊗[R] N) where
op_smul_eq_smul r x :=
x.induction_on (by rw [smul_zero, smul_zero])
(fun x y => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', op_smul_eq_smul]) fun x y hx hy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
section
-- Like `R'`, `R'₂` provides a `DistribMulAction R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)`
variable {R'₂ : Type*} [Monoid R'₂] [DistribMulAction R'₂ M]
variable [SMulCommClass R R'₂ M]
/-- `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M` implies `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance smulCommClass_left [SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M] : SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N) where
smul_comm r' r'₂ x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul', smul_comm]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]; rw [ihx, ihy]
#align tensor_product.smul_comm_class_left TensorProduct.smulCommClass_left
variable [SMul R'₂ R']
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_left [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
#align tensor_product.is_scalar_tower_left TensorProduct.isScalarTower_left
variable [DistribMulAction R'₂ N] [DistribMulAction R' N]
variable [CompatibleSMul R R'₂ M N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N]
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_right [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
#align tensor_product.is_scalar_tower_right TensorProduct.isScalarTower_right
end
/-- A short-cut instance for the common case, where the requirements for the `compatible_smul`
instances are sufficient. -/
instance isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M] : IsScalarTower R' R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.isScalarTower_left
#align tensor_product.is_scalar_tower TensorProduct.isScalarTower
-- or right
variable (R M N)
/-- The canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def mk : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (· ⊗ₜ ·) add_tmul (fun c m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul])
tmul_add tmul_smul
#align tensor_product.mk TensorProduct.mk
variable {R M N}
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (m : M) (n : N) : mk R M N m n = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.mk_apply TensorProduct.mk_apply
theorem ite_tmul (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(if P then x₁ else 0) ⊗ₜ[R] x₂ = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
#align tensor_product.ite_tmul TensorProduct.ite_tmul
theorem tmul_ite (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(x₁ ⊗ₜ[R] if P then x₂ else 0) = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
#align tensor_product.tmul_ite TensorProduct.tmul_ite
section
theorem sum_tmul {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (m : α → M) (n : N) :
(∑ a ∈ s, m a) ⊗ₜ[R] n = ∑ a ∈ s, m a ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has ih h
· simp
· simp [Finset.sum_insert has, add_tmul, ih]
#align tensor_product.sum_tmul TensorProduct.sum_tmul
theorem tmul_sum (m : M) {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (n : α → N) :
(m ⊗ₜ[R] ∑ a ∈ s, n a) = ∑ a ∈ s, m ⊗ₜ[R] n a := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has ih h
· simp
· simp [Finset.sum_insert has, tmul_add, ih]
#align tensor_product.tmul_sum TensorProduct.tmul_sum
end
variable (R M N)
/-- The simple (aka pure) elements span the tensor product. -/
theorem span_tmul_eq_top : Submodule.span R { t : M ⊗[R] N | ∃ m n, m ⊗ₜ n = t } = ⊤ := by
ext t; simp only [Submodule.mem_top, iff_true_iff]
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro m n
apply Submodule.subset_span
use m, n
· intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
exact Submodule.add_mem _ ht₁ ht₂
#align tensor_product.span_tmul_eq_top TensorProduct.span_tmul_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk_top_top_eq_top : Submodule.map₂ (mk R M N) ⊤ ⊤ = ⊤ := by
rw [← top_le_iff, ← span_tmul_eq_top, Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2]
exact Submodule.span_mono fun _ ⟨m, n, h⟩ => ⟨m, trivial, n, trivial, h⟩
#align tensor_product.map₂_mk_top_top_eq_top TensorProduct.map₂_mk_top_top_eq_top
theorem exists_eq_tmul_of_forall (x : TensorProduct R M N)
(h : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), ∃ m n, m₁ ⊗ₜ n₁ + m₂ ⊗ₜ n₂ = m ⊗ₜ[R] n) :
∃ m n, x = m ⊗ₜ n := by
induction x using TensorProduct.induction_on with
| zero =>
use 0, 0
rw [TensorProduct.zero_tmul]
| tmul m n => use m, n
| add x y h₁ h₂ =>
obtain ⟨m₁, n₁, rfl⟩ := h₁
obtain ⟨m₂, n₂, rfl⟩ := h₂
apply h
end Module
section UMP
variable {M N}
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P)
/-- Auxiliary function to constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def liftAux : M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
liftAddHom (LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom'.comp <| f.toAddMonoidHom)
fun r m n => by dsimp; rw [LinearMap.map_smul₂, map_smul]
#align tensor_product.lift_aux TensorProduct.liftAux
theorem liftAux_tmul (m n) : liftAux f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lift_aux_tmul TensorProduct.liftAux_tmul
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem liftAux.smul (r : R) (x) : liftAux f (r • x) = r • liftAux f x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (smul_zero _).symm
(fun p q => by simp_rw [← tmul_smul, liftAux_tmul, (f p).map_smul])
fun p q ih1 ih2 => by simp_rw [smul_add, (liftAux f).map_add, ih1, ih2, smul_add]
#align tensor_product.lift_aux.smul TensorProduct.liftAux.smul
variable (f)
/-- Constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P` with the property that
its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ liftAux f with map_smul' := liftAux.smul }
#align tensor_product.lift TensorProduct.lift
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul (x y) : lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lift.tmul TensorProduct.lift.tmul
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul' (x y) : (lift f).1 (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lift.tmul' TensorProduct.lift.tmul'
theorem ext' {g h : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
LinearMap.ext fun z =>
TensorProduct.induction_on z (by simp_rw [LinearMap.map_zero]) H fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [g.map_add, h.map_add, ihx, ihy]
#align tensor_product.ext' TensorProduct.ext'
theorem lift.unique {g : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y) : g = lift f :=
ext' fun m n => by rw [H, lift.tmul]
#align tensor_product.lift.unique TensorProduct.lift.unique
theorem lift_mk : lift (mk R M N) = LinearMap.id :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => rfl
#align tensor_product.lift_mk TensorProduct.lift_mk
theorem lift_compr₂ (g : P →ₗ[R] Q) : lift (f.compr₂ g) = g.comp (lift f) :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => by simp
#align tensor_product.lift_compr₂ TensorProduct.lift_compr₂
theorem lift_mk_compr₂ (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) : lift ((mk R M N).compr₂ f) = f := by
rw [lift_compr₂ f, lift_mk, LinearMap.comp_id]
#align tensor_product.lift_mk_compr₂ TensorProduct.lift_mk_compr₂
/-- This used to be an `@[ext]` lemma, but it fails very slowly when the `ext` tactic tries to apply
it in some cases, notably when one wants to show equality of two linear maps. The `@[ext]`
attribute is now added locally where it is needed. Using this as the `@[ext]` lemma instead of
`TensorProduct.ext'` allows `ext` to apply lemmas specific to `M →ₗ _` and `N →ₗ _`.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
theorem ext {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P} (H : (mk R M N).compr₂ g = (mk R M N).compr₂ h) : g = h := by
rw [← lift_mk_compr₂ g, H, lift_mk_compr₂]
#align tensor_product.ext TensorProduct.ext
attribute [local ext high] ext
example : M → N → (M → N → P) → P := fun m => flip fun f => f m
variable (R M N P)
/-- Linearly constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def uncurry : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
LinearMap.flip <| lift <| LinearMap.lflip.comp (LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id)
#align tensor_product.uncurry TensorProduct.uncurry
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
uncurry R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n := by rw [uncurry, LinearMap.flip_apply, lift.tmul]; rfl
#align tensor_product.uncurry_apply TensorProduct.uncurry_apply
variable (R M N P)
/-- A linear equivalence constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ uncurry R M N P with
invFun := fun f => (mk R M N).compr₂ f
left_inv := fun _ => LinearMap.ext₂ fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _
right_inv := fun _ => ext' fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _ }
#align tensor_product.lift.equiv TensorProduct.lift.equiv
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
lift.equiv R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
uncurry_apply f m n
#align tensor_product.lift.equiv_apply TensorProduct.lift.equiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_symm_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lift.equiv_symm_apply TensorProduct.lift.equiv_symm_apply
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lcurry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm
#align tensor_product.lcurry TensorProduct.lcurry
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem lcurry_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : lcurry R M N P f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lcurry_apply TensorProduct.lcurry_apply
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def curry (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
lcurry R M N P f
#align tensor_product.curry TensorProduct.curry
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : curry f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.curry_apply TensorProduct.curry_apply
theorem curry_injective : Function.Injective (curry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) → M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :=
fun _ _ H => ext H
#align tensor_product.curry_injective TensorProduct.curry_injective
theorem ext_threefold {g h : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P →ₗ[R] Q}
(H : ∀ x y z, g (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext x y z
exact H x y z
#align tensor_product.ext_threefold TensorProduct.ext_threefold
-- We'll need this one for checking the pentagon identity!
theorem ext_fourfold {g h : ((M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P) ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, g (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext w x y z
exact H w x y z
#align tensor_product.ext_fourfold TensorProduct.ext_fourfold
/-- Two linear maps (M ⊗ N) ⊗ (P ⊗ Q) → S which agree on all elements of the
form (m ⊗ₜ n) ⊗ₜ (p ⊗ₜ q) are equal. -/
theorem ext_fourfold' {φ ψ : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, φ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z)) = ψ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z))) : φ = ψ := by
ext m n p q
exact H m n p q
#align tensor_product.ext_fourfold' TensorProduct.ext_fourfold'
end UMP
variable {M N}
section
variable (R M)
/-- The base ring is a left identity for the tensor product of modules, up to linear equivalence.
-/
protected def lid : R ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[R] M :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (lift <| LinearMap.lsmul R M) (mk R R M 1) (LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
(ext' fun r m => by simp; rw [← tmul_smul, ← smul_tmul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one])
#align tensor_product.lid TensorProduct.lid
end
@[simp]
theorem lid_tmul (m : M) (r : R) : (TensorProduct.lid R M : R ⊗ M → M) (r ⊗ₜ m) = r • m :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lid_tmul TensorProduct.lid_tmul
@[simp]
theorem lid_symm_apply (m : M) : (TensorProduct.lid R M).symm m = 1 ⊗ₜ m :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lid_symm_apply TensorProduct.lid_symm_apply
section
variable (R M N)
/-- The tensor product of modules is commutative, up to linear equivalence.
-/
protected def comm : M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] M :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (lift (mk R N M).flip) (lift (mk R M N).flip) (ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
(ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
#align tensor_product.comm TensorProduct.comm
@[simp]
theorem comm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N) (m ⊗ₜ n) = n ⊗ₜ m :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.comm_tmul TensorProduct.comm_tmul
@[simp]
theorem comm_symm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N).symm (n ⊗ₜ m) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.comm_symm_tmul TensorProduct.comm_symm_tmul
lemma lift_comp_comm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :
lift f ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N M = lift f.flip :=
ext rfl
end
section
variable (R M)
/-- The base ring is a right identity for the tensor product of modules, up to linear equivalence.
-/
protected def rid : M ⊗[R] R ≃ₗ[R] M :=
LinearEquiv.trans (TensorProduct.comm R M R) (TensorProduct.lid R M)
#align tensor_product.rid TensorProduct.rid
end
@[simp]
theorem rid_tmul (m : M) (r : R) : (TensorProduct.rid R M) (m ⊗ₜ r) = r • m :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.rid_tmul TensorProduct.rid_tmul
@[simp]
theorem rid_symm_apply (m : M) : (TensorProduct.rid R M).symm m = m ⊗ₜ 1 :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.rid_symm_apply TensorProduct.rid_symm_apply
variable (R) in
theorem lid_eq_rid : TensorProduct.lid R R = TensorProduct.rid R R :=
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| ext' mul_comm
open LinearMap
section
variable (R M N P)
/-- The associator for tensor product of R-modules, as a linear equivalence. -/
protected def assoc : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N ⊗[R] P := by
refine
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (lift <| lift <| comp (lcurry R _ _ _) <| mk _ _ _)
(lift <| comp (uncurry R _ _ _) <| curry <| mk _ _ _)
(ext <| LinearMap.ext fun m => ext' fun n p => ?_)
(ext <| flip_inj <| LinearMap.ext fun p => ext' fun m n => ?_) <;>
repeat'
first
|rw [lift.tmul]|rw [compr₂_apply]|rw [comp_apply]|rw [mk_apply]|rw [flip_apply]
|rw [lcurry_apply]|rw [uncurry_apply]|rw [curry_apply]|rw [id_apply]
#align tensor_product.assoc TensorProduct.assoc
end
@[simp]
theorem assoc_tmul (m : M) (n : N) (p : P) :
(TensorProduct.assoc R M N P) (m ⊗ₜ n ⊗ₜ p) = m ⊗ₜ (n ⊗ₜ p) :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.assoc_tmul TensorProduct.assoc_tmul
@[simp]
theorem assoc_symm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) (p : P) :
(TensorProduct.assoc R M N P).symm (m ⊗ₜ (n ⊗ₜ p)) = m ⊗ₜ n ⊗ₜ p :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.assoc_symm_tmul TensorProduct.assoc_symm_tmul
/-- The tensor product of a pair of linear maps between modules. -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
lift <| comp (compl₂ (mk _ _ _) g) f
#align tensor_product.map TensorProduct.map
@[simp]
theorem map_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) (n : N) : map f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.map_tmul TensorProduct.map_tmul
/-- Given linear maps `f : M → P`, `g : N → Q`, if we identify `M ⊗ N` with `N ⊗ M` and `P ⊗ Q`
with `Q ⊗ P`, then this lemma states that `f ⊗ g = g ⊗ f`. -/
lemma map_comp_comm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map f g ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N M = TensorProduct.comm R Q P ∘ₗ map g f :=
ext rfl
lemma map_comm (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (x : N ⊗[R] M):
map f g (TensorProduct.comm R N M x) = TensorProduct.comm R Q P (map g f x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_comp_comm_eq _ _) _
/-- Given linear maps `f : M → Q`, `g : N → S`, and `h : P → T`, if we identify `(M ⊗ N) ⊗ P`
with `M ⊗ (N ⊗ P)` and `(Q ⊗ S) ⊗ T` with `Q ⊗ (S ⊗ T)`, then this lemma states that
`f ⊗ (g ⊗ h) = (f ⊗ g) ⊗ h`. -/
lemma map_map_comp_assoc_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S) (h : P →ₗ[R] T) :
map f (map g h) ∘ₗ TensorProduct.assoc R M N P =
TensorProduct.assoc R Q S T ∘ₗ map (map f g) h :=
ext <| ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => LinearMap.ext fun _ => LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
lemma map_map_assoc (f : M →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S) (h : P →ₗ[R] T) (x : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P) :
map f (map g h) (TensorProduct.assoc R M N P x) =
TensorProduct.assoc R Q S T (map (map f g) h x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_map_comp_assoc_eq _ _ _) _
/-- Given linear maps `f : M → Q`, `g : N → S`, and `h : P → T`, if we identify `M ⊗ (N ⊗ P)`
with `(M ⊗ N) ⊗ P` and `Q ⊗ (S ⊗ T)` with `(Q ⊗ S) ⊗ T`, then this lemma states that
`(f ⊗ g) ⊗ h = f ⊗ (g ⊗ h)`. -/
lemma map_map_comp_assoc_symm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S) (h : P →ₗ[R] T) :
map (map f g) h ∘ₗ (TensorProduct.assoc R M N P).symm =
(TensorProduct.assoc R Q S T).symm ∘ₗ map f (map g h) :=
ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
lemma map_map_assoc_symm (f : M →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S) (h : P →ₗ[R] T) (x : M ⊗[R] (N ⊗[R] P)) :
map (map f g) h ((TensorProduct.assoc R M N P).symm x) =
(TensorProduct.assoc R Q S T).symm (map f (map g h) x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_map_comp_assoc_symm_eq _ _ _) _
theorem map_range_eq_span_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
range (map f g) = Submodule.span R { t | ∃ m n, f m ⊗ₜ g n = t } := by
simp only [← Submodule.map_top, ← span_tmul_eq_top, Submodule.map_span, Set.mem_image,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
congr; ext t
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨m, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩
use m, n
simp only [map_tmul]
· rintro ⟨m, n, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨⟨m, n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [map_tmul]
#align tensor_product.map_range_eq_span_tmul TensorProduct.map_range_eq_span_tmul
/-- Given submodules `p ⊆ P` and `q ⊆ Q`, this is the natural map: `p ⊗ q → P ⊗ Q`. -/
@[simp]
def mapIncl (p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) : p ⊗[R] q →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
map p.subtype q.subtype
#align tensor_product.map_incl TensorProduct.mapIncl
lemma range_mapIncl (p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) :
LinearMap.range (mapIncl p q) = Submodule.span R (Set.image2 (· ⊗ₜ ·) p q) := by
rw [mapIncl, map_range_eq_span_tmul]
congr; ext; simp
theorem map₂_eq_range_lift_comp_mapIncl (f : P →ₗ[R] Q →ₗ[R] M)
(p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) :
Submodule.map₂ f p q = LinearMap.range (lift f ∘ₗ mapIncl p q) := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.range_comp, range_mapIncl, Submodule.map_span,
Set.image_image2, Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2, lift.tmul]
section
variable {P' Q' : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid P'] [Module R P']
variable [AddCommMonoid Q'] [Module R Q']
theorem map_comp (f₂ : P →ₗ[R] P') (f₁ : M →ₗ[R] P) (g₂ : Q →ₗ[R] Q') (g₁ : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map (f₂.comp f₁) (g₂.comp g₁) = (map f₂ g₂).comp (map f₁ g₁) :=
ext' fun _ _ => rfl
#align tensor_product.map_comp TensorProduct.map_comp
lemma range_mapIncl_mono {p p' : Submodule R P} {q q' : Submodule R Q} (hp : p ≤ p') (hq : q ≤ q') :
LinearMap.range (mapIncl p q) ≤ LinearMap.range (mapIncl p' q') := by
simp_rw [range_mapIncl]
exact Submodule.span_mono (Set.image2_subset hp hq)
theorem lift_comp_map (i : P →ₗ[R] Q →ₗ[R] Q') (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(lift i).comp (map f g) = lift ((i.comp f).compl₂ g) :=
ext' fun _ _ => rfl
#align tensor_product.lift_comp_map TensorProduct.lift_comp_map
attribute [local ext high] ext
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 899 | 901 | theorem map_id : map (id : M →ₗ[R] M) (id : N →ₗ[R] N) = .id := by |
ext
simp only [mk_apply, id_coe, compr₂_apply, _root_.id, map_tmul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
#align_import data.polynomial.mirror from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# "Mirror" of a univariate polynomial
In this file we define `Polynomial.mirror`, a variant of `Polynomial.reverse`. The difference
between `reverse` and `mirror` is that `reverse` will decrease the degree if the polynomial is
divisible by `X`.
## Main definitions
- `Polynomial.mirror`
## Main results
- `Polynomial.mirror_mul_of_domain`: `mirror` preserves multiplication.
- `Polynomial.irreducible_of_mirror`: an irreducibility criterion involving `mirror`
-/
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (p q : R[X])
/-- mirror of a polynomial: reverses the coefficients while preserving `Polynomial.natDegree` -/
noncomputable def mirror :=
p.reverse * X ^ p.natTrailingDegree
#align polynomial.mirror Polynomial.mirror
@[simp]
theorem mirror_zero : (0 : R[X]).mirror = 0 := by simp [mirror]
#align polynomial.mirror_zero Polynomial.mirror_zero
theorem mirror_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) : (monomial n a).mirror = monomial n a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· rw [ha, monomial_zero_right, mirror_zero]
· rw [mirror, reverse, natDegree_monomial n a, if_neg ha, natTrailingDegree_monomial ha, ←
C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, revAt_le (le_refl n), tsub_self, pow_zero,
mul_one]
#align polynomial.mirror_monomial Polynomial.mirror_monomial
theorem mirror_C (a : R) : (C a).mirror = C a :=
mirror_monomial 0 a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mirror_C Polynomial.mirror_C
theorem mirror_X : X.mirror = (X : R[X]) :=
mirror_monomial 1 (1 : R)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mirror_X Polynomial.mirror_X
theorem mirror_natDegree : p.mirror.natDegree = p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, mirror_zero]
nontriviality R
rw [mirror, natDegree_mul', reverse_natDegree, natDegree_X_pow,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le p.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree]
rwa [leadingCoeff_X_pow, mul_one, reverse_leadingCoeff, Ne, trailingCoeff_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.mirror_nat_degree Polynomial.mirror_natDegree
theorem mirror_natTrailingDegree : p.mirror.natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, mirror_zero]
· rw [mirror, natTrailingDegree_mul_X_pow ((mt reverse_eq_zero.mp) hp),
natTrailingDegree_reverse, zero_add]
#align polynomial.mirror_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.mirror_natTrailingDegree
theorem coeff_mirror (n : ℕ) :
p.mirror.coeff n = p.coeff (revAt (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) n) := by
by_cases h2 : p.natDegree < n
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (by rwa [mirror_natDegree])]
by_cases h1 : n ≤ p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree
· rw [revAt_le h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree]
exact (tsub_lt_iff_left h1).mpr (Nat.add_lt_add_right h2 _)
· rw [← revAtFun_eq, revAtFun, if_neg h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt h2]
rw [not_lt] at h2
rw [revAt_le (h2.trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))]
by_cases h3 : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ n
· rw [← tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h2, ← tsub_tsub_assoc h2 h3, mirror, coeff_mul_X_pow', if_pos h3,
coeff_reverse, revAt_le (tsub_le_self.trans h2)]
rw [not_le] at h3
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_tsub_iff_right.mpr (Nat.add_lt_add_left h3 _))]
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree (by rwa [mirror_natTrailingDegree])
#align polynomial.coeff_mirror Polynomial.coeff_mirror
--TODO: Extract `Finset.sum_range_rev_at` lemma.
theorem mirror_eval_one : p.mirror.eval 1 = p.eval 1 := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_range, one_pow, mul_one, mirror_natDegree]
refine Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun n _ _ => revAt (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) n
· intro n hn hp
rw [Finset.mem_range_succ_iff] at *
rw [revAt_le (hn.trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))]
rw [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le, add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_right, ← mirror_natTrailingDegree]
exact natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hp
· exact fun n₁ _ _ _ _ _ h => by rw [← @revAt_invol _ n₁, h, revAt_invol]
· intro n hn hp
use revAt (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) n
refine ⟨?_, ?_, revAt_invol⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_range_succ_iff] at *
rw [revAt_le (hn.trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))]
rw [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le, add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hp
· change p.mirror.coeff _ ≠ 0
rwa [coeff_mirror, revAt_invol]
· exact fun n _ _ => p.coeff_mirror n
#align polynomial.mirror_eval_one Polynomial.mirror_eval_one
theorem mirror_mirror : p.mirror.mirror = p :=
Polynomial.ext fun n => by
rw [coeff_mirror, coeff_mirror, mirror_natDegree, mirror_natTrailingDegree, revAt_invol]
#align polynomial.mirror_mirror Polynomial.mirror_mirror
variable {p q}
theorem mirror_involutive : Function.Involutive (mirror : R[X] → R[X]) :=
mirror_mirror
#align polynomial.mirror_involutive Polynomial.mirror_involutive
theorem mirror_eq_iff : p.mirror = q ↔ p = q.mirror :=
mirror_involutive.eq_iff
#align polynomial.mirror_eq_iff Polynomial.mirror_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem mirror_inj : p.mirror = q.mirror ↔ p = q :=
mirror_involutive.injective.eq_iff
#align polynomial.mirror_inj Polynomial.mirror_inj
@[simp]
theorem mirror_eq_zero : p.mirror = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← p.mirror_mirror, h, mirror_zero], fun h => by rw [h, mirror_zero]⟩
#align polynomial.mirror_eq_zero Polynomial.mirror_eq_zero
variable (p q)
@[simp]
theorem mirror_trailingCoeff : p.mirror.trailingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, trailingCoeff, mirror_natTrailingDegree, coeff_mirror,
revAt_le (Nat.le_add_left _ _), add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align polynomial.mirror_trailing_coeff Polynomial.mirror_trailingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem mirror_leadingCoeff : p.mirror.leadingCoeff = p.trailingCoeff := by
rw [← p.mirror_mirror, mirror_trailingCoeff, p.mirror_mirror]
#align polynomial.mirror_leading_coeff Polynomial.mirror_leadingCoeff
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Mirror.lean | 161 | 169 | theorem coeff_mul_mirror :
(p * p.mirror).coeff (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) = p.sum fun n => (· ^ 2) := by |
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk]
refine
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun n hn => ?_).trans
(p.sum_eq_of_subset (fun _ ↦ (· ^ 2)) (fun _ ↦ zero_pow two_ne_zero) fun n hn ↦
Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mpr
((le_natDegree_of_mem_supp n hn).trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))).symm
rw [coeff_mirror, ← revAt_le (Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hn), revAt_invol, ← sq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearPMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
#align_import topology.algebra.module.linear_pmap from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Partially defined linear operators over topological vector spaces
We define basic notions of partially defined linear operators, which we call unbounded operators
for short.
In this file we prove all elementary properties of unbounded operators that do not assume that the
underlying spaces are normed.
## Main definitions
* `LinearPMap.IsClosed`: An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed.
* `LinearPMap.IsClosable`: An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a
graph.
* `LinearPMap.closure`: For a closable unbounded operator `f : LinearPMap R E F` the closure is
the smallest closed extension of `f`. If `f` is not closable, then `f.closure` is defined as `f`.
* `LinearPMap.HasCore`: a submodule contained in the domain is a core if restricting to the core
does not lose information about the unbounded operator.
## Main statements
* `LinearPMap.closable_iff_exists_closed_extension`: an unbounded operator is closable iff it has a
closed extension.
* `LinearPMap.closable.exists_unique`: there exists a unique closure
* `LinearPMap.closureHasCore`: the domain of `f` is a core of its closure
## References
* [J. Weidmann, *Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces*][weidmann_linear]
## Tags
Unbounded operators, closed operators
-/
open Topology
variable {R E F : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
variable [Module R E] [Module R F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
namespace LinearPMap
/-! ### Closed and closable operators -/
/-- An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed. -/
def IsClosed (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
_root_.IsClosed (f.graph : Set (E × F))
#align linear_pmap.is_closed LinearPMap.IsClosed
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [ContinuousSMul R E] [ContinuousSMul R F]
/-- An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a graph. -/
def IsClosable (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
∃ f' : LinearPMap R E F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph
#align linear_pmap.is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosable
/-- A closed operator is trivially closable. -/
theorem IsClosed.isClosable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosed) : f.IsClosable :=
⟨f, hf.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq⟩
#align linear_pmap.is_closed.is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosed.isClosable
/-- If `g` has a closable extension `f`, then `g` itself is closable. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/LinearPMap.lean | 77 | 85 | theorem IsClosable.leIsClosable {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) (hfg : g ≤ f) :
g.IsClosable := by |
cases' hf with f' hf
have : g.graph.topologicalClosure ≤ f'.graph := by
rw [← hf]
exact Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono (le_graph_of_le hfg)
use g.graph.topologicalClosure.toLinearPMap
rw [Submodule.toLinearPMap_graph_eq]
exact fun _ hx hx' => f'.graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (this hx) hx'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
/-!
# Lebesgue Integration on Groups
We develop properties of integrals with a group as domain.
This file contains properties about Lebesgue integration.
-/
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace
open scoped ENNReal
variable {G : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] {μ : Measure G} {g : G}
section MeasurableMul
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul G]
/-- Translating a function by left-multiplication does not change its Lebesgue integral
with respect to a left-invariant measure. -/
@[to_additive
"Translating a function by left-addition does not change its Lebesgue integral with
respect to a left-invariant measure."]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/LIntegral.lean | 34 | 37 | theorem lintegral_mul_left_eq_self [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] (f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (g : G) :
(∫⁻ x, f (g * x) ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by |
convert (lintegral_map_equiv f <| MeasurableEquiv.mulLeft g).symm
simp [map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.SupIndep
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
#align_import order.partition.finpartition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
/-!
# Finite partitions
In this file, we define finite partitions. A finpartition of `a : α` is a finite set of pairwise
disjoint parts `parts : Finset α` which does not contain `⊥` and whose supremum is `a`.
Finpartitions of a finset are at the heart of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. They are also studied
purely order theoretically in Sperner theory.
## Constructions
We provide many ways to build finpartitions:
* `Finpartition.ofErase`: Builds a finpartition by erasing `⊥` for you.
* `Finpartition.ofSubset`: Builds a finpartition from a subset of the parts of a previous
finpartition.
* `Finpartition.empty`: The empty finpartition of `⊥`.
* `Finpartition.indiscrete`: The indiscrete, aka trivial, aka pure, finpartition made of a single
part.
* `Finpartition.discrete`: The discrete finpartition of `s : Finset α` made of singletons.
* `Finpartition.bind`: Puts together the finpartitions of the parts of a finpartition into a new
finpartition.
* `Finpartition.ofSetoid`: With `Fintype α`, constructs the finpartition of `univ : Finset α`
induced by the equivalence classes of `s : Setoid α`.
* `Finpartition.atomise`: Makes a finpartition of `s : Finset α` by breaking `s` along all finsets
in `F : Finset (Finset α)`. Two elements of `s` belong to the same part iff they belong to the
same elements of `F`.
`Finpartition.indiscrete` and `Finpartition.bind` together form the monadic structure of
`Finpartition`.
## Implementation notes
Forbidding `⊥` as a part follows mathematical tradition and is a pragmatic choice concerning
operations on `Finpartition`. Not caring about `⊥` being a part or not breaks extensionality (it's
not because the parts of `P` and the parts of `Q` have the same elements that `P = Q`). Enforcing
`⊥` to be a part makes `Finpartition.bind` uglier and doesn't rid us of the need of
`Finpartition.ofErase`.
## TODO
The order is the wrong way around to make `Finpartition a` a graded order. Is it bad to depart from
the literature and turn the order around?
-/
open Finset Function
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A finite partition of `a : α` is a pairwise disjoint finite set of elements whose supremum is
`a`. We forbid `⊥` as a part. -/
@[ext]
structure Finpartition [Lattice α] [OrderBot α] (a : α) where
-- Porting note: Docstrings added
/-- The elements of the finite partition of `a` -/
parts : Finset α
/-- The partition is supremum-independent -/
supIndep : parts.SupIndep id
/-- The supremum of the partition is `a` -/
sup_parts : parts.sup id = a
/-- No element of the partition is bottom-/
not_bot_mem : ⊥ ∉ parts
deriving DecidableEq
#align finpartition Finpartition
#align finpartition.parts Finpartition.parts
#align finpartition.sup_indep Finpartition.supIndep
#align finpartition.sup_parts Finpartition.sup_parts
#align finpartition.not_bot_mem Finpartition.not_bot_mem
-- Porting note: attribute [protected] doesn't work
-- attribute [protected] Finpartition.supIndep
namespace Finpartition
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
/-- A `Finpartition` constructor which does not insist on `⊥` not being a part. -/
@[simps]
def ofErase [DecidableEq α] {a : α} (parts : Finset α) (sup_indep : parts.SupIndep id)
(sup_parts : parts.sup id = a) : Finpartition a where
parts := parts.erase ⊥
supIndep := sup_indep.subset (erase_subset _ _)
sup_parts := (sup_erase_bot _).trans sup_parts
not_bot_mem := not_mem_erase _ _
#align finpartition.of_erase Finpartition.ofErase
/-- A `Finpartition` constructor from a bigger existing finpartition. -/
@[simps]
def ofSubset {a b : α} (P : Finpartition a) {parts : Finset α} (subset : parts ⊆ P.parts)
(sup_parts : parts.sup id = b) : Finpartition b :=
{ parts := parts
supIndep := P.supIndep.subset subset
sup_parts := sup_parts
not_bot_mem := fun h ↦ P.not_bot_mem (subset h) }
#align finpartition.of_subset Finpartition.ofSubset
/-- Changes the type of a finpartition to an equal one. -/
@[simps]
def copy {a b : α} (P : Finpartition a) (h : a = b) : Finpartition b where
parts := P.parts
supIndep := P.supIndep
sup_parts := h ▸ P.sup_parts
not_bot_mem := P.not_bot_mem
#align finpartition.copy Finpartition.copy
/-- Transfer a finpartition over an order isomorphism. -/
def map {β : Type*} [Lattice β] [OrderBot β] {a : α} (e : α ≃o β) (P : Finpartition a) :
Finpartition (e a) where
parts := P.parts.map e
supIndep u hu _ hb hbu _ hx hxu := by
rw [← map_symm_subset] at hu
simp only [mem_map_equiv] at hb
have := P.supIndep hu hb (by simp [hbu]) (map_rel e.symm hx) ?_
· rw [← e.symm.map_bot] at this
exact e.symm.map_rel_iff.mp this
· convert e.symm.map_rel_iff.mpr hxu
rw [map_finset_sup, sup_map]
rfl
sup_parts := by simp [← P.sup_parts]
not_bot_mem := by
rw [mem_map_equiv]
convert P.not_bot_mem
exact e.symm.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem parts_map {β : Type*} [Lattice β] [OrderBot β] {a : α} {e : α ≃o β} {P : Finpartition a} :
(P.map e).parts = P.parts.map e := rfl
variable (α)
/-- The empty finpartition. -/
@[simps]
protected def empty : Finpartition (⊥ : α) where
parts := ∅
supIndep := supIndep_empty _
sup_parts := Finset.sup_empty
not_bot_mem := not_mem_empty ⊥
#align finpartition.empty Finpartition.empty
instance : Inhabited (Finpartition (⊥ : α)) :=
⟨Finpartition.empty α⟩
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_empty : (default : Finpartition (⊥ : α)) = Finpartition.empty α :=
rfl
#align finpartition.default_eq_empty Finpartition.default_eq_empty
variable {α} {a : α}
/-- The finpartition in one part, aka indiscrete finpartition. -/
@[simps]
def indiscrete (ha : a ≠ ⊥) : Finpartition a where
parts := {a}
supIndep := supIndep_singleton _ _
sup_parts := Finset.sup_singleton
not_bot_mem h := ha (mem_singleton.1 h).symm
#align finpartition.indiscrete Finpartition.indiscrete
variable (P : Finpartition a)
protected theorem le {b : α} (hb : b ∈ P.parts) : b ≤ a :=
(le_sup hb).trans P.sup_parts.le
#align finpartition.le Finpartition.le
theorem ne_bot {b : α} (hb : b ∈ P.parts) : b ≠ ⊥ := by
intro h
refine P.not_bot_mem (?_)
rw [h] at hb
exact hb
#align finpartition.ne_bot Finpartition.ne_bot
protected theorem disjoint : (P.parts : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint id :=
P.supIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
#align finpartition.disjoint Finpartition.disjoint
variable {P}
theorem parts_eq_empty_iff : P.parts = ∅ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← P.sup_parts]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun b hb ↦ P.not_bot_mem ?_⟩
· rw [h]
exact Finset.sup_empty
· rwa [← le_bot_iff.1 ((le_sup hb).trans h.le)]
#align finpartition.parts_eq_empty_iff Finpartition.parts_eq_empty_iff
theorem parts_nonempty_iff : P.parts.Nonempty ↔ a ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, not_iff_not, parts_eq_empty_iff]
#align finpartition.parts_nonempty_iff Finpartition.parts_nonempty_iff
theorem parts_nonempty (P : Finpartition a) (ha : a ≠ ⊥) : P.parts.Nonempty :=
parts_nonempty_iff.2 ha
#align finpartition.parts_nonempty Finpartition.parts_nonempty
instance : Unique (Finpartition (⊥ : α)) :=
{ (inferInstance : Inhabited (Finpartition (⊥ : α))) with
uniq := fun P ↦ by
ext a
exact iff_of_false (fun h ↦ P.ne_bot h <| le_bot_iff.1 <| P.le h) (not_mem_empty a) }
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- There's a unique partition of an atom. -/
abbrev _root_.IsAtom.uniqueFinpartition (ha : IsAtom a) : Unique (Finpartition a) where
default := indiscrete ha.1
uniq P := by
have h : ∀ b ∈ P.parts, b = a := fun _ hb ↦
(ha.le_iff.mp <| P.le hb).resolve_left (P.ne_bot hb)
ext b
refine Iff.trans ⟨h b, ?_⟩ mem_singleton.symm
rintro rfl
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := P.parts_nonempty ha.1
simp_rw [← h c hc]
exact hc
#align is_atom.unique_finpartition IsAtom.uniqueFinpartition
instance [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : Fintype (Finpartition a) :=
@Fintype.ofSurjective { p : Finset α // p.SupIndep id ∧ p.sup id = a ∧ ⊥ ∉ p } (Finpartition a) _
(Subtype.fintype _) (fun i ↦ ⟨i.1, i.2.1, i.2.2.1, i.2.2.2⟩) fun ⟨_, y, z, w⟩ ↦
⟨⟨_, y, z, w⟩, rfl⟩
/-! ### Refinement order -/
section Order
/-- We say that `P ≤ Q` if `P` refines `Q`: each part of `P` is less than some part of `Q`. -/
instance : LE (Finpartition a) :=
⟨fun P Q ↦ ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ P.parts → ∃ c ∈ Q.parts, b ≤ c⟩
instance : PartialOrder (Finpartition a) :=
{ (inferInstance : LE (Finpartition a)) with
le_refl := fun P b hb ↦ ⟨b, hb, le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun P Q R hPQ hQR b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hQR hc
exact ⟨d, hd, hbc.trans hcd⟩
le_antisymm := fun P Q hPQ hQP ↦ by
ext b
refine ⟨fun hb ↦ ?_, fun hb ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hQP hc
rwa [hbc.antisymm]
rwa [P.disjoint.eq_of_le hb hd (P.ne_bot hb) (hbc.trans hcd)]
· obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hQP hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hPQ hc
rwa [hbc.antisymm]
rwa [Q.disjoint.eq_of_le hb hd (Q.ne_bot hb) (hbc.trans hcd)] }
instance [Decidable (a = ⊥)] : OrderTop (Finpartition a) where
top := if ha : a = ⊥ then (Finpartition.empty α).copy ha.symm else indiscrete ha
le_top P := by
split_ifs with h
· intro x hx
simpa [h, P.ne_bot hx] using P.le hx
· exact fun b hb ↦ ⟨a, mem_singleton_self _, P.le hb⟩
theorem parts_top_subset (a : α) [Decidable (a = ⊥)] : (⊤ : Finpartition a).parts ⊆ {a} := by
intro b hb
have hb : b ∈ Finpartition.parts (dite _ _ _) := hb
split_ifs at hb
· simp only [copy_parts, empty_parts, not_mem_empty] at hb
· exact hb
#align finpartition.parts_top_subset Finpartition.parts_top_subset
theorem parts_top_subsingleton (a : α) [Decidable (a = ⊥)] :
((⊤ : Finpartition a).parts : Set α).Subsingleton :=
Set.subsingleton_of_subset_singleton fun _ hb ↦ mem_singleton.1 <| parts_top_subset _ hb
#align finpartition.parts_top_subsingleton Finpartition.parts_top_subsingleton
end Order
end Lattice
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α]
section Inf
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α}
instance : Inf (Finpartition a) :=
⟨fun P Q ↦
ofErase ((P.parts ×ˢ Q.parts).image fun bc ↦ bc.1 ⊓ bc.2)
(by
rw [supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase]
simp only [mem_image, and_imp, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, id, Prod.exists,
mem_product, Finset.disjoint_sup_right, mem_erase, Ne]
rintro _ x₁ y₁ hx₁ hy₁ rfl _ h x₂ y₂ hx₂ hy₂ rfl
rcases eq_or_ne x₁ x₂ with (rfl | xdiff)
· refine Disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right (Q.disjoint hy₁ hy₂ ?_)
intro t
simp [t] at h
exact Disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left (P.disjoint hx₁ hx₂ xdiff))
(by
rw [sup_image, id_comp, sup_product_left]
trans P.parts.sup id ⊓ Q.parts.sup id
· simp_rw [Finset.sup_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup_inf_distrib_left]
rfl
· rw [P.sup_parts, Q.sup_parts, inf_idem])⟩
@[simp]
theorem parts_inf (P Q : Finpartition a) :
(P ⊓ Q).parts = ((P.parts ×ˢ Q.parts).image fun bc : α × α ↦ bc.1 ⊓ bc.2).erase ⊥ :=
rfl
#align finpartition.parts_inf Finpartition.parts_inf
instance : SemilatticeInf (Finpartition a) :=
{ (inferInstance : PartialOrder (Finpartition a)),
(inferInstance : Inf (Finpartition a)) with
inf_le_left := fun P Q b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_mem_erase hb)
rw [mem_product] at hc
exact ⟨c.1, hc.1, inf_le_left⟩
inf_le_right := fun P Q b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_mem_erase hb)
rw [mem_product] at hc
exact ⟨c.2, hc.2, inf_le_right⟩
le_inf := fun P Q R hPQ hPR b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hbd⟩ := hPR hb
have h := _root_.le_inf hbc hbd
refine
⟨c ⊓ d,
mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (P.ne_bot hb) h)
(mem_image.2 ⟨(c, d), mem_product.2 ⟨hc, hd⟩, rfl⟩),
h⟩ }
end Inf
theorem exists_le_of_le {a b : α} {P Q : Finpartition a} (h : P ≤ Q) (hb : b ∈ Q.parts) :
∃ c ∈ P.parts, c ≤ b := by
by_contra H
refine Q.ne_bot hb (disjoint_self.1 <| Disjoint.mono_right (Q.le hb) ?_)
rw [← P.sup_parts, Finset.disjoint_sup_right]
rintro c hc
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := h hc
refine (Q.disjoint hb hd ?_).mono_right hcd
rintro rfl
simp only [not_exists, not_and] at H
exact H _ hc hcd
#align finpartition.exists_le_of_le Finpartition.exists_le_of_le
theorem card_mono {a : α} {P Q : Finpartition a} (h : P ≤ Q) : Q.parts.card ≤ P.parts.card := by
classical
have : ∀ b ∈ Q.parts, ∃ c ∈ P.parts, c ≤ b := fun b ↦ exists_le_of_le h
choose f hP hf using this
rw [← card_attach]
refine card_le_card_of_inj_on (fun b ↦ f _ b.2) (fun b _ ↦ hP _ b.2) fun b _ c _ h ↦ ?_
exact
Subtype.coe_injective
(Q.disjoint.elim b.2 c.2 fun H ↦
P.ne_bot (hP _ b.2) <| disjoint_self.1 <| H.mono (hf _ b.2) <| h.le.trans <| hf _ c.2)
#align finpartition.card_mono Finpartition.card_mono
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α}
section Bind
variable {P : Finpartition a} {Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i}
/-- Given a finpartition `P` of `a` and finpartitions of each part of `P`, this yields the
finpartition of `a` obtained by juxtaposing all the subpartitions. -/
@[simps]
def bind (P : Finpartition a) (Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i) : Finpartition a where
parts := P.parts.attach.biUnion fun i ↦ (Q i.1 i.2).parts
supIndep := by
rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint]
rintro a ha b hb h
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion] at ha hb
obtain ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨⟨B, hB⟩, -, hb⟩ := hb
obtain rfl | hAB := eq_or_ne A B
· exact (Q A hA).disjoint ha hb h
· exact (P.disjoint hA hB hAB).mono ((Q A hA).le ha) ((Q B hB).le hb)
sup_parts := by
simp_rw [sup_biUnion]
trans (sup P.parts id)
· rw [eq_comm, ← Finset.sup_attach]
exact sup_congr rfl fun b _hb ↦ (Q b.1 b.2).sup_parts.symm
· exact P.sup_parts
not_bot_mem h := by
rw [Finset.mem_biUnion] at h
obtain ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, h⟩ := h
exact (Q A hA).not_bot_mem h
#align finpartition.bind Finpartition.bind
theorem mem_bind : b ∈ (P.bind Q).parts ↔ ∃ A hA, b ∈ (Q A hA).parts := by
rw [bind, mem_biUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, h⟩
exact ⟨A, hA, h⟩
· rintro ⟨A, hA, h⟩
exact ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, mem_attach _ ⟨A, hA⟩, h⟩
#align finpartition.mem_bind Finpartition.mem_bind
theorem card_bind (Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i) :
(P.bind Q).parts.card = ∑ A ∈ P.parts.attach, (Q _ A.2).parts.card := by
apply card_biUnion
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩ - ⟨c, hc⟩ - hbc
rw [Finset.disjoint_left]
rintro d hdb hdc
rw [Ne, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at hbc
exact
(Q b hb).ne_bot hdb
(eq_bot_iff.2 <|
(le_inf ((Q b hb).le hdb) <| (Q c hc).le hdc).trans <| (P.disjoint hb hc hbc).le_bot)
#align finpartition.card_bind Finpartition.card_bind
end Bind
/-- Adds `b` to a finpartition of `a` to make a finpartition of `a ⊔ b`. -/
@[simps]
def extend (P : Finpartition a) (hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hab : Disjoint a b) (hc : a ⊔ b = c) :
Finpartition c where
parts := insert b P.parts
supIndep := by
rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint, coe_insert]
exact P.disjoint.insert fun d hd _ ↦ hab.symm.mono_right <| P.le hd
sup_parts := by rwa [sup_insert, P.sup_parts, id, _root_.sup_comm]
not_bot_mem h := (mem_insert.1 h).elim hb.symm P.not_bot_mem
#align finpartition.extend Finpartition.extend
theorem card_extend (P : Finpartition a) (b c : α) {hb : b ≠ ⊥} {hab : Disjoint a b}
{hc : a ⊔ b = c} : (P.extend hb hab hc).parts.card = P.parts.card + 1 :=
card_insert_of_not_mem fun h ↦ hb <| hab.symm.eq_bot_of_le <| P.le h
#align finpartition.card_extend Finpartition.card_extend
end DistribLattice
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α} (P : Finpartition a)
/-- Restricts a finpartition to avoid a given element. -/
@[simps!]
def avoid (b : α) : Finpartition (a \ b) :=
ofErase
(P.parts.image (· \ b))
(P.disjoint.image_finset_of_le fun a ↦ sdiff_le).supIndep
(by rw [sup_image, id_comp, Finset.sup_sdiff_right, ← Function.id_def, P.sup_parts])
#align finpartition.avoid Finpartition.avoid
@[simp]
theorem mem_avoid : c ∈ (P.avoid b).parts ↔ ∃ d ∈ P.parts, ¬d ≤ b ∧ d \ b = c := by
simp only [avoid, ofErase, mem_erase, Ne, mem_image, exists_prop, ← exists_and_left,
@and_left_comm (c ≠ ⊥)]
refine exists_congr fun d ↦ and_congr_right' <| and_congr_left ?_
rintro rfl
rw [sdiff_eq_bot_iff]
#align finpartition.mem_avoid Finpartition.mem_avoid
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
end Finpartition
/-! ### Finite partitions of finsets -/
namespace Finpartition
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u : Finset α} (P : Finpartition s) {a : α}
theorem nonempty_of_mem_parts {a : Finset α} (ha : a ∈ P.parts) : a.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 <| P.ne_bot ha
#align finpartition.nonempty_of_mem_parts Finpartition.nonempty_of_mem_parts
lemma eq_of_mem_parts (ht : t ∈ P.parts) (hu : u ∈ P.parts) (hat : a ∈ t) (hau : a ∈ u) : t = u :=
P.disjoint.elim ht hu <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨a, hat, hau⟩
theorem exists_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : ∃ t ∈ P.parts, a ∈ t := by
simp_rw [← P.sup_parts] at ha
exact mem_sup.1 ha
#align finpartition.exists_mem Finpartition.exists_mem
theorem biUnion_parts : P.parts.biUnion id = s :=
(sup_eq_biUnion _ _).symm.trans P.sup_parts
#align finpartition.bUnion_parts Finpartition.biUnion_parts
theorem existsUnique_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : ∃! t, t ∈ P.parts ∧ a ∈ t := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := P.exists_mem ha
refine ⟨t, ⟨ht, ht'⟩, ?_⟩
rintro u ⟨hu, hu'⟩
exact P.eq_of_mem_parts hu ht hu' ht'
/-- The part of the finpartition that `a` lies in. -/
def part (a : α) : Finset α := if ha : a ∈ s then choose (hp := P.existsUnique_mem ha) else ∅
theorem part_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : P.part a ∈ P.parts := by simp [part, ha, choose_mem]
theorem mem_part (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ P.part a := by simp [part, ha, choose_property]
theorem part_surjOn : Set.SurjOn P.part s P.parts := fun p hp ↦ by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := P.nonempty_of_mem_parts hp
have hx' := mem_of_subset (P.le hp) hx
use x, hx', (P.existsUnique_mem hx').unique ⟨P.part_mem hx', P.mem_part hx'⟩ ⟨hp, hx⟩
theorem exists_subset_part_bijOn : ∃ r ⊆ s, Set.BijOn P.part r P.parts := by
obtain ⟨r, hrs, hr⟩ := P.part_surjOn.exists_bijOn_subset
lift r to Finset α using s.finite_toSet.subset hrs
exact ⟨r, mod_cast hrs, hr⟩
/-- Equivalence between a finpartition's parts as a dependent sum and the partitioned set. -/
def equivSigmaParts : s ≃ Σ t : P.parts, t.1 where
toFun x := ⟨⟨P.part x.1, P.part_mem x.2⟩, ⟨x, P.mem_part x.2⟩⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.2, mem_of_subset (P.le x.1.2) x.2.2⟩
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by
ext e
· obtain ⟨⟨p, mp⟩, ⟨f, mf⟩⟩ := x
dsimp only at mf ⊢
have mfs := mem_of_subset (P.le mp) mf
rw [P.eq_of_mem_parts mp (P.part_mem mfs) mf (P.mem_part mfs)]
· simp
lemma exists_enumeration : ∃ f : s ≃ Σ t : P.parts, Fin t.1.card,
∀ a b : s, P.part a = P.part b ↔ (f a).1 = (f b).1 := by
use P.equivSigmaParts.trans ((Equiv.refl _).sigmaCongr (fun t ↦ t.1.equivFin))
simp [equivSigmaParts, Equiv.sigmaCongr, Equiv.sigmaCongrLeft]
theorem sum_card_parts : ∑ i ∈ P.parts, i.card = s.card := by
convert congr_arg Finset.card P.biUnion_parts
rw [card_biUnion P.supIndep.pairwiseDisjoint]
rfl
#align finpartition.sum_card_parts Finpartition.sum_card_parts
/-- `⊥` is the partition in singletons, aka discrete partition. -/
instance (s : Finset α) : Bot (Finpartition s) :=
⟨{ parts := s.map ⟨singleton, singleton_injective⟩
supIndep :=
Set.PairwiseDisjoint.supIndep
(by
rw [Finset.coe_map]
exact Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_range_singleton.subset (Set.image_subset_range _ _))
sup_parts := by rw [sup_map, id_comp, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Finset.sup_singleton']
not_bot_mem := by simp }⟩
@[simp]
theorem parts_bot (s : Finset α) :
(⊥ : Finpartition s).parts = s.map ⟨singleton, singleton_injective⟩ :=
rfl
#align finpartition.parts_bot Finpartition.parts_bot
theorem card_bot (s : Finset α) : (⊥ : Finpartition s).parts.card = s.card :=
Finset.card_map _
#align finpartition.card_bot Finpartition.card_bot
theorem mem_bot_iff : t ∈ (⊥ : Finpartition s).parts ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, {a} = t :=
mem_map
#align finpartition.mem_bot_iff Finpartition.mem_bot_iff
instance (s : Finset α) : OrderBot (Finpartition s) :=
{ (inferInstance : Bot (Finpartition s)) with
bot_le := fun P t ht ↦ by
rw [mem_bot_iff] at ht
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ht
obtain ⟨t, ht, hat⟩ := P.exists_mem ha
exact ⟨t, ht, singleton_subset_iff.2 hat⟩ }
theorem card_parts_le_card : P.parts.card ≤ s.card := by
rw [← card_bot s]
exact card_mono bot_le
#align finpartition.card_parts_le_card Finpartition.card_parts_le_card
lemma card_mod_card_parts_le : s.card % P.parts.card ≤ P.parts.card := by
rcases P.parts.card.eq_zero_or_pos with h | h
· have h' := h
rw [Finset.card_eq_zero, parts_eq_empty_iff, bot_eq_empty, ← Finset.card_eq_zero] at h'
rw [h, h']
· exact (Nat.mod_lt _ h).le
variable [Fintype α]
/-- A setoid over a finite type induces a finpartition of the type's elements,
where the parts are the setoid's equivalence classes. -/
def ofSetoid (s : Setoid α) [DecidableRel s.r] : Finpartition (univ : Finset α) where
parts := univ.image fun a => univ.filter (s.r a)
supIndep := by
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left, supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint, Set.PairwiseDisjoint,
Set.Pairwise, coe_image, coe_univ, Set.image_univ, Set.mem_range, ne_eq,
forall_exists_index, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff]
intro _ _ q
contrapose! q
rw [not_disjoint_iff] at q
obtain ⟨c, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ := q
rw [id_eq, mem_filter] at d1 d2
ext y
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left, mem_filter, true_and]
exact ⟨fun r1 => s.trans (s.trans d2.2 (s.symm d1.2)) r1,
fun r2 => s.trans (s.trans d1.2 (s.symm d2.2)) r2⟩
sup_parts := by
ext a
simp only [sup_image, Function.id_comp, mem_univ, mem_sup, mem_filter, true_and, iff_true]
use a; exact s.refl a
not_bot_mem := by
rw [bot_eq_empty, mem_image, not_exists]
intro a
simp only [filter_eq_empty_iff, not_forall, mem_univ, forall_true_left, true_and, not_not]
use a; exact s.refl a
theorem mem_part_ofSetoid_iff_rel {s : Setoid α} [DecidableRel s.r] {b : α} :
b ∈ (ofSetoid s).part a ↔ s.r a b := by
simp_rw [part, ofSetoid, mem_univ, reduceDite]
generalize_proofs H
have := choose_spec _ _ H
simp only [mem_univ, mem_image, true_and] at this
obtain ⟨⟨_, hc⟩, this⟩ := this
simp only [← hc, mem_univ, mem_filter, true_and] at this ⊢
exact ⟨s.trans (s.symm this), s.trans this⟩
section Atomise
/-- Cuts `s` along the finsets in `F`: Two elements of `s` will be in the same part if they are
in the same finsets of `F`. -/
def atomise (s : Finset α) (F : Finset (Finset α)) : Finpartition s :=
ofErase (F.powerset.image fun Q ↦ s.filter fun i ↦ ∀ t ∈ F, t ∈ Q ↔ i ∈ t)
(Set.PairwiseDisjoint.supIndep fun x hx y hy h ↦
disjoint_left.mpr fun z hz1 hz2 ↦
h (by
rw [mem_coe, mem_image] at hx hy
obtain ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩ := hy
suffices h' : Q = R by
subst h'
exact of_eq_true (eq_self (
filter (fun i ↦ ∀ (t : Finset α), t ∈ F → (t ∈ Q ↔ i ∈ t)) s))
rw [id, mem_filter] at hz1 hz2
rw [mem_powerset] at hQ hR
ext i
refine ⟨fun hi ↦ ?_, fun hi ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [hz2.2 _ (hQ hi), ← hz1.2 _ (hQ hi)]
· rwa [hz1.2 _ (hR hi), ← hz2.2 _ (hR hi)]))
(by
refine (Finset.sup_le fun t ht ↦ ?_).antisymm fun a ha ↦ ?_
· rw [mem_image] at ht
obtain ⟨A, _, rfl⟩ := ht
exact s.filter_subset _
· rw [mem_sup]
refine
⟨s.filter fun i ↦ ∀ t, t ∈ F → ((t ∈ F.filter fun u ↦ a ∈ u) ↔ i ∈ t),
mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_powerset.2 <| filter_subset _ _),
mem_filter.2 ⟨ha, fun t ht ↦ ?_⟩⟩
rw [mem_filter]
exact and_iff_right ht)
#align finpartition.atomise Finpartition.atomise
variable {F : Finset (Finset α)}
theorem mem_atomise :
t ∈ (atomise s F).parts ↔
t.Nonempty ∧ ∃ Q ⊆ F, (s.filter fun i ↦ ∀ u ∈ F, u ∈ Q ↔ i ∈ u) = t := by
simp only [atomise, ofErase, bot_eq_empty, mem_erase, mem_image, nonempty_iff_ne_empty,
mem_singleton, and_comm, mem_powerset, exists_prop]
#align finpartition.mem_atomise Finpartition.mem_atomise
theorem atomise_empty (hs : s.Nonempty) : (atomise s ∅).parts = {s} := by
simp only [atomise, powerset_empty, image_singleton, not_mem_empty, IsEmpty.forall_iff,
imp_true_iff, filter_True]
exact erase_eq_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 hs.ne_empty.symm)
#align finpartition.atomise_empty Finpartition.atomise_empty
theorem card_atomise_le : (atomise s F).parts.card ≤ 2 ^ F.card :=
(card_le_card <| erase_subset _ _).trans <| Finset.card_image_le.trans (card_powerset _).le
#align finpartition.card_atomise_le Finpartition.card_atomise_le
theorem biUnion_filter_atomise (ht : t ∈ F) (hts : t ⊆ s) :
((atomise s F).parts.filter fun u ↦ u ⊆ t ∧ u.Nonempty).biUnion id = t := by
ext a
refine mem_biUnion.trans ⟨fun ⟨u, hu, ha⟩ ↦ (mem_filter.1 hu).2.1 ha, fun ha ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu, hau⟩ := (atomise s F).exists_mem (hts ha)
refine ⟨u, mem_filter.2 ⟨hu, fun b hb ↦ ?_, _, hau⟩, hau⟩
obtain ⟨Q, _hQ, rfl⟩ := (mem_atomise.1 hu).2
rw [mem_filter] at hau hb
rwa [← hb.2 _ ht, hau.2 _ ht]
#align finpartition.bUnion_filter_atomise Finpartition.biUnion_filter_atomise
| Mathlib/Order/Partition/Finpartition.lean | 689 | 701 | theorem card_filter_atomise_le_two_pow (ht : t ∈ F) :
((atomise s F).parts.filter fun u ↦ u ⊆ t ∧ u.Nonempty).card ≤ 2 ^ (F.card - 1) := by |
suffices h :
((atomise s F).parts.filter fun u ↦ u ⊆ t ∧ u.Nonempty) ⊆
(F.erase t).powerset.image fun P ↦ s.filter fun i ↦ ∀ x ∈ F, x ∈ insert t P ↔ i ∈ x by
refine (card_le_card h).trans (card_image_le.trans ?_)
rw [card_powerset, card_erase_of_mem ht]
rw [subset_iff]
simp_rw [mem_image, mem_powerset, mem_filter, and_imp, Finset.Nonempty, exists_imp, mem_atomise,
and_imp, Finset.Nonempty, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro P' i hi P PQ rfl hy₂ j _hj
refine ⟨P.erase t, erase_subset_erase _ PQ, ?_⟩
simp only [insert_erase (((mem_filter.1 hi).2 _ ht).2 <| hy₂ hi)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
#align_import algebra.support from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"29cb56a7b35f72758b05a30490e1f10bd62c35c1"
/-!
# Support of a function
In this file we define `Function.support f = {x | f x ≠ 0}` and prove its basic properties.
We also define `Function.mulSupport f = {x | f x ≠ 1}`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Function
variable {α β A B M N P G : Type*}
section One
variable [One M] [One N] [One P]
/-- `mulSupport` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
def mulSupport (f : α → M) : Set α := {x | f x ≠ 1}
#align function.mul_support Function.mulSupport
#align function.support Function.support
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_preimage (f : α → M) : mulSupport f = f ⁻¹' {1}ᶜ :=
rfl
#align function.mul_support_eq_preimage Function.mulSupport_eq_preimage
#align function.support_eq_preimage Function.support_eq_preimage
@[to_additive]
theorem nmem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∉ mulSupport f ↔ f x = 1 :=
not_not
#align function.nmem_mul_support Function.nmem_mulSupport
#align function.nmem_support Function.nmem_support
@[to_additive]
theorem compl_mulSupport {f : α → M} : (mulSupport f)ᶜ = { x | f x = 1 } :=
ext fun _ => nmem_mulSupport
#align function.compl_mul_support Function.compl_mulSupport
#align function.compl_support Function.compl_support
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∈ mulSupport f ↔ f x ≠ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align function.mem_mul_support Function.mem_mulSupport
#align function.mem_support Function.mem_support
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} : mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 1 → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align function.mul_support_subset_iff Function.mulSupport_subset_iff
#align function.support_subset_iff Function.support_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff' {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 1 :=
forall_congr' fun _ => not_imp_comm
#align function.mul_support_subset_iff' Function.mulSupport_subset_iff'
#align function.support_subset_iff' Function.support_subset_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f = s ↔ (∀ x, x ∈ s → f x ≠ 1) ∧ ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [ext_iff, mem_mulSupport, ne_eq, iff_def,
not_imp_comm, and_comm, forall_and]
#align function.mul_support_eq_iff Function.mulSupport_eq_iff
#align function.support_eq_iff Function.support_eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff_mulSupport {f g : α → M} :
f = g ↔ f.mulSupport = g.mulSupport ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.mulSupport, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ funext fun x ↦ by
if hx : x ∈ f.mulSupport then exact h₂ x hx
else rw [nmem_mulSupport.1 hx, nmem_mulSupport.1 (mt (Set.ext_iff.1 h₁ x).2 hx)]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_of_ne_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) {y : M} (hy : y ≠ 1) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = insert x (mulSupport f) := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) :
mulSupport (update f x 1) = mulSupport f \ {x} := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_eq_ite [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] (f : α → M) (x : α) (y : M) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = if y = 1 then mulSupport f \ {x} else insert x (mulSupport f) := by
rcases eq_or_ne y 1 with rfl | hy <;> simp [mulSupport_update_one, mulSupport_update_of_ne_one, *]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one_subset {f : α → M} {g : α → N} :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) ⊆ f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_subset_iff'.mpr fun x hfg ↦ by
by_cases hf : ∃ a, f a = x
· rw [extend, dif_pos hf, ← nmem_mulSupport]
rw [← Classical.choose_spec hf] at hfg
exact fun hg ↦ hfg ⟨_, hg, rfl⟩
· rw [extend_apply' _ _ _ hf]; rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one {f : α → M} {g : α → N} (hf : f.Injective) :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) = f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_extend_one_subset.antisymm <| by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; rwa [mem_mulSupport, hf.extend_apply]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Support.lean | 119 | 122 | theorem mulSupport_disjoint_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
Disjoint (mulSupport f) s ↔ EqOn f 1 s := by |
simp_rw [← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, mulSupport_subset_iff', not_mem_compl_iff, EqOn,
Pi.one_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sort
import Mathlib.Order.Category.NonemptyFinLinOrd
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsIso
#align_import algebraic_topology.simplex_category from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8ac6315bcfcbaf2d19a046719c3b553206dac75"
/-! # The simplex category
We construct a skeletal model of the simplex category, with objects `ℕ` and the
morphism `n ⟶ m` being the monotone maps from `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin (m+1)`.
We show that this category is equivalent to `NonemptyFinLinOrd`.
## Remarks
The definitions `SimplexCategory` and `SimplexCategory.Hom` are marked as irreducible.
We provide the following functions to work with these objects:
1. `SimplexCategory.mk` creates an object of `SimplexCategory` out of a natural number.
Use the notation `[n]` in the `Simplicial` locale.
2. `SimplexCategory.len` gives the "length" of an object of `SimplexCategory`, as a natural.
3. `SimplexCategory.Hom.mk` makes a morphism out of a monotone map between `Fin`'s.
4. `SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom` gives the underlying monotone map associated to a
term of `SimplexCategory.Hom`.
-/
universe v
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
/-- The simplex category:
* objects are natural numbers `n : ℕ`
* morphisms from `n` to `m` are monotone functions `Fin (n+1) → Fin (m+1)`
-/
def SimplexCategory :=
ℕ
#align simplex_category SimplexCategory
namespace SimplexCategory
section
-- Porting note: the definition of `SimplexCategory` is made irreducible below
/-- Interpret a natural number as an object of the simplex category. -/
def mk (n : ℕ) : SimplexCategory :=
n
#align simplex_category.mk SimplexCategory.mk
/-- the `n`-dimensional simplex can be denoted `[n]` -/
scoped[Simplicial] notation "[" n "]" => SimplexCategory.mk n
-- TODO: Make `len` irreducible.
/-- The length of an object of `SimplexCategory`. -/
def len (n : SimplexCategory) : ℕ :=
n
#align simplex_category.len SimplexCategory.len
@[ext]
theorem ext (a b : SimplexCategory) : a.len = b.len → a = b :=
id
#align simplex_category.ext SimplexCategory.ext
attribute [irreducible] SimplexCategory
open Simplicial
@[simp]
theorem len_mk (n : ℕ) : [n].len = n :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.len_mk SimplexCategory.len_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_len (n : SimplexCategory) : ([n.len] : SimplexCategory) = n :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.mk_len SimplexCategory.mk_len
/-- A recursor for `SimplexCategory`. Use it as `induction Δ using SimplexCategory.rec`. -/
protected def rec {F : SimplexCategory → Sort*} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, F [n]) : ∀ X, F X := fun n =>
h n.len
#align simplex_category.rec SimplexCategory.rec
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- Morphisms in the `SimplexCategory`. -/
protected def Hom (a b : SimplexCategory) :=
Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)
#align simplex_category.hom SimplexCategory.Hom
namespace Hom
/-- Make a morphism in `SimplexCategory` from a monotone map of `Fin`'s. -/
def mk {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)) : SimplexCategory.Hom a b :=
f
#align simplex_category.hom.mk SimplexCategory.Hom.mk
/-- Recover the monotone map from a morphism in the simplex category. -/
def toOrderHom {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1) :=
f
#align simplex_category.hom.to_order_hom SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom
theorem ext' {a b : SimplexCategory} (f g : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
f.toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom → f = g :=
id
#align simplex_category.hom.ext SimplexCategory.Hom.ext'
attribute [irreducible] SimplexCategory.Hom
@[simp]
theorem mk_toOrderHom {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) : mk f.toOrderHom = f :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.mk_to_order_hom SimplexCategory.Hom.mk_toOrderHom
@[simp]
theorem toOrderHom_mk {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)) :
(mk f).toOrderHom = f :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.to_order_hom_mk SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom_mk
theorem mk_toOrderHom_apply {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1))
(i : Fin (a.len + 1)) : (mk f).toOrderHom i = f i :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.mk_to_order_hom_apply SimplexCategory.Hom.mk_toOrderHom_apply
/-- Identity morphisms of `SimplexCategory`. -/
@[simp]
def id (a : SimplexCategory) : SimplexCategory.Hom a a :=
mk OrderHom.id
#align simplex_category.hom.id SimplexCategory.Hom.id
/-- Composition of morphisms of `SimplexCategory`. -/
@[simp]
def comp {a b c : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom b c) (g : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
SimplexCategory.Hom a c :=
mk <| f.toOrderHom.comp g.toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.hom.comp SimplexCategory.Hom.comp
end Hom
instance smallCategory : SmallCategory.{0} SimplexCategory where
Hom n m := SimplexCategory.Hom n m
id m := SimplexCategory.Hom.id _
comp f g := SimplexCategory.Hom.comp g f
#align simplex_category.small_category SimplexCategory.smallCategory
@[simp]
lemma id_toOrderHom (a : SimplexCategory) :
Hom.toOrderHom (𝟙 a) = OrderHom.id := rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_toOrderHom {a b c: SimplexCategory} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(f ≫ g).toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom.comp f.toOrderHom := rfl
-- Porting note: added because `Hom.ext'` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
theorem Hom.ext {a b : SimplexCategory} (f g : a ⟶ b) :
f.toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom → f = g :=
Hom.ext' _ _
/-- The constant morphism from [0]. -/
def const (x y : SimplexCategory) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) : x ⟶ y :=
Hom.mk <| ⟨fun _ => i, by tauto⟩
#align simplex_category.const SimplexCategory.const
@[simp]
lemma const_eq_id : const [0] [0] 0 = 𝟙 _ := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma const_apply (x y : SimplexCategory) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) (a : Fin (x.len + 1)) :
(const x y i).toOrderHom a = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_comp (x : SimplexCategory) {y z : SimplexCategory}
(f : y ⟶ z) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) :
const x y i ≫ f = const x z (f.toOrderHom i) :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.const_comp SimplexCategory.const_comp
/-- Make a morphism `[n] ⟶ [m]` from a monotone map between fin's.
This is useful for constructing morphisms between `[n]` directly
without identifying `n` with `[n].len`.
-/
@[simp]
def mkHom {n m : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) →o Fin (m + 1)) : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [m] :=
SimplexCategory.Hom.mk f
#align simplex_category.mk_hom SimplexCategory.mkHom
theorem hom_zero_zero (f : ([0] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [0]) : f = 𝟙 _ := by
ext : 3
apply @Subsingleton.elim (Fin 1)
#align simplex_category.hom_zero_zero SimplexCategory.hom_zero_zero
end
open Simplicial
section Generators
/-!
## Generating maps for the simplex category
TODO: prove that the simplex category is equivalent to
one given by the following generators and relations.
-/
/-- The `i`-th face map from `[n]` to `[n+1]` -/
def δ {n} (i : Fin (n + 2)) : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n + 1] :=
mkHom (Fin.succAboveOrderEmb i).toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.δ SimplexCategory.δ
/-- The `i`-th degeneracy map from `[n+1]` to `[n]` -/
def σ {n} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : ([n + 1] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n] :=
mkHom
{ toFun := Fin.predAbove i
monotone' := Fin.predAbove_right_monotone i }
#align simplex_category.σ SimplexCategory.σ
/-- The generic case of the first simplicial identity -/
theorem δ_comp_δ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ j) :
δ i ≫ δ j.succ = δ j ≫ δ (Fin.castSucc i) := by
ext k
dsimp [δ, Fin.succAbove]
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩
rcases j with ⟨j, _⟩
rcases k with ⟨k, _⟩
split_ifs <;> · simp at * <;> omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ
theorem δ_comp_δ' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : Fin.castSucc i < j) :
δ i ≫ δ j =
δ (j.pred fun (hj : j = 0) => by simp [hj, Fin.not_lt_zero] at H) ≫
δ (Fin.castSucc i) := by
rw [← δ_comp_δ]
· rw [Fin.succ_pred]
· simpa only [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← Fin.val_succ,
j.succ_pred, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val] using H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ'
theorem δ_comp_δ'' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
δ (i.castLT (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.le_iff_val_le_val.mp H) j.is_lt)) ≫ δ j.succ =
δ j ≫ δ i := by
rw [δ_comp_δ]
· rfl
· exact H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ'' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ''
/-- The special case of the first simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} : δ i ≫ δ (Fin.castSucc i) = δ i ≫ δ i.succ :=
(δ_comp_δ (le_refl i)).symm
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ_self SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
δ i ≫ δ j = δ i ≫ δ i.succ := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_δ_self]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ_self' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ_self'
/-- The second simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_le {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ j.succ = σ j ≫ δ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [σ, δ]
rcases le_or_lt i k with (hik | hik)
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hik),
Fin.succ_predAbove_succ, Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc]
rcases le_or_lt k (j.castSucc) with (hjk | hjk)
· rwa [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk, Fin.castSucc_castPred]
· rw [Fin.le_castSucc_iff, Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.succ_pred]
exact H.trans_lt hjk
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hik)]
have hjk := H.trans_lt' hik
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr
(hjk.trans (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ _)).le),
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk.le, Fin.castPred_castSucc, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt,
Fin.castSucc_castPred]
rwa [Fin.castSucc_castPred]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_le SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_le
/-- The first part of the third simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
rcases i with ⟨i, hi⟩
ext ⟨j, hj⟩
simp? at hj says simp only [len_mk] at hj
dsimp [σ, δ, Fin.predAbove, Fin.succAbove]
simp only [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, Fin.dite_val, Fin.ite_val, Fin.coe_pred, ge_iff_le,
Fin.coe_castLT, dite_eq_ite]
split_ifs
any_goals simp
all_goals omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_self SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self' {n} {j : Fin (n + 2)} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
δ j ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_self]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_self' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_self'
/-- The second part of the third simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} : δ i.succ ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
ext j
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩
rcases j with ⟨j, _⟩
dsimp [δ, σ, Fin.succAbove, Fin.predAbove]
split_ifs <;> simp <;> simp at * <;> omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_succ SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_succ
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ' {n} (j : Fin (n + 2)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (H : j = i.succ) :
δ j ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_succ]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_succ' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_succ'
/-- The fourth simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : Fin.castSucc j < i) :
δ i.succ ≫ σ (Fin.castSucc j) = σ j ≫ δ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [δ, σ]
rcases le_or_lt k i with (hik | hik)
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr hik)]
rcases le_or_lt k (j.castSucc) with (hjk | hjk)
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _
(Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hjk), Fin.castPred_castSucc,
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, Fin.castSucc_castPred]
rw [Fin.castSucc_castPred]
exact hjk.trans_lt H
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hjk),
Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt,
Fin.castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
rwa [Fin.castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, Fin.succ_pred]
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hik)]
have hjk := H.trans hik
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _
(Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr hjk.le),
Fin.pred_succ, Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc, Fin.succ_pred]
rwa [Fin.le_castSucc_pred_iff]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_gt SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_gt
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : j.succ < i) :
δ i ≫ σ j = σ (j.castLT ((add_lt_add_iff_right 1).mp (lt_of_lt_of_le H i.is_le))) ≫
δ (i.pred fun (hi : i = 0) => by simp only [Fin.not_lt_zero, hi] at H) := by
rw [← δ_comp_σ_of_gt]
· simp
· rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT, ← Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff, Fin.succ_pred]
exact H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_gt' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_gt'
/-- The fifth simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem σ_comp_σ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : i ≤ j) :
σ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ j = σ j.succ ≫ σ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [σ]
cases' k using Fin.lastCases with k
· simp only [len_mk, Fin.predAbove_right_last]
· cases' k using Fin.cases with k
· rw [Fin.castSucc_zero, Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ 0 (Fin.zero_le _),
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.zero_le _), Fin.castPred_zero,
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ 0 (Fin.zero_le _),
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.zero_le _)]
· rcases le_or_lt i k with (h | h)
· simp_rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt i.castSucc _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr
(Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)), ← Fin.succ_castSucc, Fin.pred_succ,
Fin.succ_predAbove_succ]
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt i _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr _), Fin.pred_succ]
rcases le_or_lt k j with (hkj | hkj)
· rwa [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hkj),
Fin.castPred_castSucc]
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hkj),
Fin.le_pred_iff,
Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff]
exact H.trans_lt hkj
· simp_rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc i.castSucc _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr
(Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)), Fin.castPred_castSucc, ← Fin.succ_castSucc,
Fin.succ_predAbove_succ]
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ k.castSucc
(Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (h.le.trans H)),
Fin.castPred_castSucc, Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ k.succ
(Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (H.trans_lt' h)), Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ k.succ
(Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)]
#align simplex_category.σ_comp_σ SimplexCategory.σ_comp_σ
/--
If `f : [m] ⟶ [n+1]` is a morphism and `j` is not in the range of `f`,
then `factor_δ f j` is a morphism `[m] ⟶ [n]` such that
`factor_δ f j ≫ δ j = f` (as witnessed by `factor_δ_spec`).
-/
def factor_δ {m n : ℕ} (f : ([m] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n+1]) (j : Fin (n+2)) :
([m] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n] :=
f ≫ σ (Fin.predAbove 0 j)
open Fin in
lemma factor_δ_spec {m n : ℕ} (f : ([m] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n+1]) (j : Fin (n+2))
(hj : ∀ (k : Fin (m+1)), f.toOrderHom k ≠ j) :
factor_δ f j ≫ δ j = f := by
ext k : 3
specialize hj k
dsimp [factor_δ, δ, σ]
cases' j using cases with j
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero, predAbove_of_castSucc_lt 0 _
(castSucc_zero ▸ pos_of_ne_zero hj),
zero_succAbove, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt 0 _ (castSucc_zero ▸ succ_pos _), pred_succ]
rcases hj.lt_or_lt with (hj | hj)
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc j _]
swap
· exact (le_castSucc_iff.mpr hj)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
swap
· rwa [castSucc_lt_succ_iff, castPred_le_iff, le_castSucc_iff]
rw [castSucc_castPred]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
swap
· exact (castSucc_lt_succ _).trans hj
rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc]
swap
· rwa [succ_le_castSucc_iff, lt_pred_iff]
rw [succ_pred]
end Generators
section Skeleton
/-- The functor that exhibits `SimplexCategory` as skeleton
of `NonemptyFinLinOrd` -/
@[simps obj map]
def skeletalFunctor : SimplexCategory ⥤ NonemptyFinLinOrd where
obj a := NonemptyFinLinOrd.of (Fin (a.len + 1))
map f := f.toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.skeletal_functor SimplexCategory.skeletalFunctor
theorem skeletalFunctor.coe_map {Δ₁ Δ₂ : SimplexCategory} (f : Δ₁ ⟶ Δ₂) :
↑(skeletalFunctor.map f) = f.toOrderHom :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.skeletal_functor.coe_map SimplexCategory.skeletalFunctor.coe_map
theorem skeletal : Skeletal SimplexCategory := fun X Y ⟨I⟩ => by
suffices Fintype.card (Fin (X.len + 1)) = Fintype.card (Fin (Y.len + 1)) by
ext
simpa
apply Fintype.card_congr
exact ((skeletalFunctor ⋙ forget NonemptyFinLinOrd).mapIso I).toEquiv
#align simplex_category.skeletal SimplexCategory.skeletal
namespace SkeletalFunctor
instance : skeletalFunctor.Full where
map_surjective f := ⟨SimplexCategory.Hom.mk f, rfl⟩
instance : skeletalFunctor.Faithful where
map_injective {_ _ f g} h := by
ext1
exact h
instance : skeletalFunctor.EssSurj where
mem_essImage X :=
⟨mk (Fintype.card X - 1 : ℕ),
⟨by
have aux : Fintype.card X = Fintype.card X - 1 + 1 :=
(Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨⊥⟩).symm
let f := monoEquivOfFin X aux
have hf := (Finset.univ.orderEmbOfFin aux).strictMono
refine
{ hom := ⟨f, hf.monotone⟩
inv := ⟨f.symm, ?_⟩
hom_inv_id := by ext1; apply f.symm_apply_apply
inv_hom_id := by ext1; apply f.apply_symm_apply }
intro i j h
show f.symm i ≤ f.symm j
rw [← hf.le_iff_le]
show f (f.symm i) ≤ f (f.symm j)
simpa only [OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]⟩⟩
noncomputable instance isEquivalence : skeletalFunctor.IsEquivalence where
#align simplex_category.skeletal_functor.is_equivalence SimplexCategory.SkeletalFunctor.isEquivalence
end SkeletalFunctor
/-- The equivalence that exhibits `SimplexCategory` as skeleton
of `NonemptyFinLinOrd` -/
noncomputable def skeletalEquivalence : SimplexCategory ≌ NonemptyFinLinOrd :=
Functor.asEquivalence skeletalFunctor
#align simplex_category.skeletal_equivalence SimplexCategory.skeletalEquivalence
end Skeleton
/-- `SimplexCategory` is a skeleton of `NonemptyFinLinOrd`.
-/
lemma isSkeletonOf :
IsSkeletonOf NonemptyFinLinOrd SimplexCategory skeletalFunctor where
skel := skeletal
eqv := SkeletalFunctor.isEquivalence
#align simplex_category.is_skeleton_of SimplexCategory.isSkeletonOf
/-- The truncated simplex category. -/
def Truncated (n : ℕ) :=
FullSubcategory fun a : SimplexCategory => a.len ≤ n
#align simplex_category.truncated SimplexCategory.Truncated
instance (n : ℕ) : SmallCategory.{0} (Truncated n) :=
FullSubcategory.category _
namespace Truncated
instance {n} : Inhabited (Truncated n) :=
⟨⟨[0], by simp⟩⟩
/-- The fully faithful inclusion of the truncated simplex category into the usual
simplex category.
-/
def inclusion {n : ℕ} : SimplexCategory.Truncated n ⥤ SimplexCategory :=
fullSubcategoryInclusion _
#align simplex_category.truncated.inclusion SimplexCategory.Truncated.inclusion
instance (n : ℕ) : (inclusion : Truncated n ⥤ _).Full := FullSubcategory.full _
instance (n : ℕ) : (inclusion : Truncated n ⥤ _).Faithful := FullSubcategory.faithful _
end Truncated
section Concrete
instance : ConcreteCategory.{0} SimplexCategory where
forget :=
{ obj := fun i => Fin (i.len + 1)
map := fun f => f.toOrderHom }
forget_faithful := ⟨fun h => by ext : 2; exact h⟩
end Concrete
section EpiMono
/-- A morphism in `SimplexCategory` is a monomorphism precisely when it is an injective function
-/
theorem mono_iff_injective {n m : SimplexCategory} {f : n ⟶ m} :
Mono f ↔ Function.Injective f.toOrderHom := by
rw [← Functor.mono_map_iff_mono skeletalEquivalence.functor]
dsimp only [skeletalEquivalence, Functor.asEquivalence_functor]
simp only [skeletalFunctor_obj, skeletalFunctor_map,
NonemptyFinLinOrd.mono_iff_injective, NonemptyFinLinOrd.coe_of]
#align simplex_category.mono_iff_injective SimplexCategory.mono_iff_injective
/-- A morphism in `SimplexCategory` is an epimorphism if and only if it is a surjective function
-/
theorem epi_iff_surjective {n m : SimplexCategory} {f : n ⟶ m} :
Epi f ↔ Function.Surjective f.toOrderHom := by
rw [← Functor.epi_map_iff_epi skeletalEquivalence.functor]
dsimp only [skeletalEquivalence, Functor.asEquivalence_functor]
simp only [skeletalFunctor_obj, skeletalFunctor_map,
NonemptyFinLinOrd.epi_iff_surjective, NonemptyFinLinOrd.coe_of]
#align simplex_category.epi_iff_surjective SimplexCategory.epi_iff_surjective
/-- A monomorphism in `SimplexCategory` must increase lengths-/
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SimplexCategory.lean | 572 | 575 | theorem len_le_of_mono {x y : SimplexCategory} {f : x ⟶ y} : Mono f → x.len ≤ y.len := by |
intro hyp_f_mono
have f_inj : Function.Injective f.toOrderHom.toFun := mono_iff_injective.1 hyp_f_mono
simpa using Fintype.card_le_of_injective f.toOrderHom.toFun f_inj
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.OpenImmersion
/-!
# Restriction of Schemes and Morphisms
## Main definition
- `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrict`: The restriction of a scheme along an open embedding.
The map `X.restrict f ⟶ X` is `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.ofRestrict`.
`X ∣_ᵤ U` is the notation for restricting onto an open set, and `ιOpens U` is a shorthand
for `X.restrict U.open_embedding : X ∣_ᵤ U ⟶ X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.morphism_restrict`: The restriction of `X ⟶ Y` to `X ∣_ᵤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U ⟶ Y ∣_ᵤ U`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe v v₁ v₂ u u₁
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v} C]
section
variable (X : Scheme.{u})
/-- `f ⁻¹ᵁ U` is notation for `(Opens.map f.1.base).obj U`,
the preimage of an open set `U` under `f`. -/
notation3:90 f:91 "⁻¹ᵁ " U:90 => (Opens.map (f : LocallyRingedSpace.Hom _ _).val.base).obj U
/-- `X ∣_ᵤ U` is notation for `X.restrict U.openEmbedding`, the restriction of `X` to an open set
`U` of `X`. -/
notation3:60 X:60 " ∣_ᵤ " U:61 => Scheme.restrict X (U : Opens X).openEmbedding
/-- The restriction of a scheme to an open subset. -/
abbrev Scheme.ιOpens {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : Opens X.carrier) : X ∣_ᵤ U ⟶ X := X.ofRestrict _
lemma Scheme.ofRestrict_val_c_app_self {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : Opens X) :
(X.ofRestrict U.openEmbedding).1.c.app (op U) = X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp)).op := rfl
lemma Scheme.eq_restrict_presheaf_map_eqToHom {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : Opens X) {V W : Opens U}
(e : U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj V = U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj W) :
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom e).op =
(X ∣_ᵤ U).presheaf.map (eqToHom <| U.openEmbedding.functor_obj_injective e).op := rfl
instance ΓRestrictAlgebra {X : Scheme.{u}} {Y : TopCat.{u}} {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : OpenEmbedding f) :
Algebra (Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)) (Scheme.Γ.obj (op <| X.restrict hf)) :=
(Scheme.Γ.map (X.ofRestrict hf).op).toAlgebra
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_restrict_algebra AlgebraicGeometry.ΓRestrictAlgebra
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen' (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X) (r : Scheme.Γ.obj (op <| X ∣_ᵤ U)) :
U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((X ∣_ᵤ U).basicOpen r) = X.basicOpen
(X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.openEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op r) := by
refine (Scheme.image_basicOpen (X.ofRestrict U.openEmbedding) r).trans ?_
erw [← Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq _ _ (eqToHom U.openEmbedding_obj_top).op]
rw [← comp_apply, ← CategoryTheory.Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl,
op_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id]
congr
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ _ _
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X) (r : Scheme.Γ.obj (op <| X ∣_ᵤ U)) :
U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((X ∣_ᵤ U).basicOpen r) = X.basicOpen r := by
rw [Scheme.map_basicOpen', Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq]
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen_map (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X) (r : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((X ∣_ᵤ U).basicOpen <|
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.openEmbedding_obj_top).op r) = X.basicOpen r := by
rw [Scheme.map_basicOpen', Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq, Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq]
-- Porting note: `simps` can't synthesize `obj_left, obj_hom, mapLeft`
/-- The functor taking open subsets of `X` to open subschemes of `X`. -/
-- @[simps obj_left obj_hom mapLeft]
def Scheme.restrictFunctor : Opens X ⥤ Over X where
obj U := Over.mk (ιOpens U)
map {U V} i :=
Over.homMk
(IsOpenImmersion.lift (ιOpens V) (ιOpens U) <| by
dsimp [restrict, ofRestrict, LocallyRingedSpace.ofRestrict, Opens.coe_inclusion]
rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
exact i.le)
(IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac _ _ _)
map_id U := by
ext1
dsimp only [Over.homMk_left, Over.id_left]
rw [← cancel_mono (ιOpens U), Category.id_comp,
IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac]
map_comp {U V W} i j := by
ext1
dsimp only [Over.homMk_left, Over.comp_left]
rw [← cancel_mono (ιOpens W), Category.assoc]
iterate 3 rw [IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctor
@[simp] lemma Scheme.restrictFunctor_obj_left (U : Opens X) :
(X.restrictFunctor.obj U).left = X ∣_ᵤ U := rfl
@[simp] lemma Scheme.restrictFunctor_obj_hom (U : Opens X) :
(X.restrictFunctor.obj U).hom = Scheme.ιOpens U := rfl
@[simp] lemma Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_left {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(X.restrictFunctor.map i).left = IsOpenImmersion.lift (ιOpens V) (ιOpens U) (by
dsimp [ofRestrict, LocallyRingedSpace.ofRestrict, Opens.inclusion]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]; rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
exact i.le) := rfl
-- Porting note: the `by ...` used to be automatically done by unification magic
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_ofRestrict {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(X.restrictFunctor.map i).1 ≫ ιOpens V = ιOpens U :=
IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac _ _ (by
dsimp [restrict, ofRestrict, LocallyRingedSpace.ofRestrict]
rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
exact i.le)
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor_map_ofRestrict AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_ofRestrict
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Restrict.lean | 131 | 135 | theorem Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_base {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(X.restrictFunctor.map i).1.1.base = (Opens.toTopCat _).map i := by |
ext a; refine Subtype.ext ?_ -- Porting note: `ext` did not pick up `Subtype.ext`
exact (congr_arg (fun f : X.restrict U.openEmbedding ⟶ X => f.1.base a)
(X.restrictFunctor_map_ofRestrict i))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Restrict
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Reflective
#align_import algebraic_geometry.Gamma_Spec_adjunction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
/-!
# Adjunction between `Γ` and `Spec`
We define the adjunction `ΓSpec.adjunction : Γ ⊣ Spec` by defining the unit (`toΓSpec`,
in multiple steps in this file) and counit (done in `Spec.lean`) and checking that they satisfy
the left and right triangle identities. The constructions and proofs make use of
maps and lemmas defined and proved in structure_sheaf.lean extensively.
Notice that since the adjunction is between contravariant functors, you get to choose
one of the two categories to have arrows reversed, and it is equally valid to present
the adjunction as `Spec ⊣ Γ` (`Spec.to_LocallyRingedSpace.right_op ⊣ Γ`), in which
case the unit and the counit would switch to each other.
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.identityToΓSpec` : The natural transformation `𝟭 _ ⟶ Γ ⋙ Spec`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `LocallyRingedSpace`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `Scheme`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
universe u
open PrimeSpectrum
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open StructureSheaf
open Spec (structureSheaf)
open TopologicalSpace
open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace
open TopCat.Presheaf
open TopCat.Presheaf.SheafCondition
namespace LocallyRingedSpace
variable (X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u})
/-- The map from the global sections to a stalk. -/
def ΓToStalk (x : X) : Γ.obj (op X) ⟶ X.presheaf.stalk x :=
X.presheaf.germ (⟨x, trivial⟩ : (⊤ : Opens X))
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_to_stalk AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.ΓToStalk
/-- The canonical map from the underlying set to the prime spectrum of `Γ(X)`. -/
def toΓSpecFun : X → PrimeSpectrum (Γ.obj (op X)) := fun x =>
comap (X.ΓToStalk x) (LocalRing.closedPoint (X.presheaf.stalk x))
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_fun AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecFun
theorem not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk (r : Γ.obj (op X)) (x : X) :
r ∉ (X.toΓSpecFun x).asIdeal ↔ IsUnit (X.ΓToStalk x r) := by
erw [LocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal, Classical.not_not]
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk
/-- The preimage of a basic open in `Spec Γ(X)` under the unit is the basic
open in `X` defined by the same element (they are equal as sets). -/
theorem toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq (r : Γ.obj (op X)) :
X.toΓSpecFun ⁻¹' (basicOpen r).1 = (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r).1 := by
ext
erw [X.toRingedSpace.mem_top_basicOpen]; apply not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_preim_basic_open_eq AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq
/-- `toΓSpecFun` is continuous. -/
theorem toΓSpec_continuous : Continuous X.toΓSpecFun := by
rw [isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens.continuous_iff]
rintro _ ⟨r, rfl⟩
erw [X.toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq r]
exact (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r).2
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_continuous AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec_continuous
/-- The canonical (bundled) continuous map from the underlying topological
space of `X` to the prime spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps]
def toΓSpecBase : X.toTopCat ⟶ Spec.topObj (Γ.obj (op X)) where
toFun := X.toΓSpecFun
continuous_toFun := X.toΓSpec_continuous
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_base AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecBase
-- These lemmas have always been bad (#7657), but lean4#2644 made `simp` start noticing
attribute [nolint simpNF] AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecBase_apply
variable (r : Γ.obj (op X))
/-- The preimage in `X` of a basic open in `Spec Γ(X)` (as an open set). -/
abbrev toΓSpecMapBasicOpen : Opens X :=
(Opens.map X.toΓSpecBase).obj (basicOpen r)
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen
/-- The preimage is the basic open in `X` defined by the same element `r`. -/
theorem toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq : X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r = X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r :=
Opens.ext (X.toΓSpec_preim_basicOpen_eq r)
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open_eq AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq
/-- The map from the global sections `Γ(X)` to the sections on the (preimage of) a basic open. -/
abbrev toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen :
X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤) ⟶ X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r) :=
X.presheaf.map (X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r).leTop.op
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen
/-- `r` is a unit as a section on the basic open defined by `r`. -/
theorem isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen : IsUnit (X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r r) := by
convert
(X.presheaf.map <| (eqToHom <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq r).op).isUnit_map
(X.toRingedSpace.isUnit_res_basicOpen r)
-- Porting note: `rw [comp_apply]` to `erw [comp_apply]`
erw [← comp_apply, ← Functor.map_comp]
congr
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.is_unit_res_to_Γ_Spec_map_basic_open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen
/-- Define the sheaf hom on individual basic opens for the unit. -/
def toΓSpecCApp :
(structureSheaf <| Γ.obj <| op X).val.obj (op <| basicOpen r) ⟶
X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r) :=
IsLocalization.Away.lift r (isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen _ r)
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_app AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCApp
/-- Characterization of the sheaf hom on basic opens,
direction ← (next lemma) is used at various places, but → is not used in this file. -/
theorem toΓSpecCApp_iff
(f :
(structureSheaf <| Γ.obj <| op X).val.obj (op <| basicOpen r) ⟶
X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r)) :
toOpen _ (basicOpen r) ≫ f = X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r ↔ f = X.toΓSpecCApp r := by
-- Porting Note: Type class problem got stuck in `IsLocalization.Away.AwayMap.lift_comp`
-- created instance manually. This replaces the `pick_goal` tactics
have loc_inst := IsLocalization.to_basicOpen (Γ.obj (op X)) r
rw [← @IsLocalization.Away.AwayMap.lift_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r loc_inst _
(X.isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r)]
--pick_goal 5; exact is_localization.to_basic_open _ r
constructor
· intro h
exact IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (Submonoid.powers r) h
apply congr_arg
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_app_iff AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCApp_iff
theorem toΓSpecCApp_spec : toOpen _ (basicOpen r) ≫ X.toΓSpecCApp r = X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r :=
(X.toΓSpecCApp_iff r _).2 rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_app_spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCApp_spec
/-- The sheaf hom on all basic opens, commuting with restrictions. -/
@[simps app]
def toΓSpecCBasicOpens :
(inducedFunctor basicOpen).op ⋙ (structureSheaf (Γ.obj (op X))).1 ⟶
(inducedFunctor basicOpen).op ⋙ ((TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ X.toΓSpecBase).obj X.𝒪).1 where
app r := X.toΓSpecCApp r.unop
naturality r s f := by
apply (StructureSheaf.to_basicOpen_epi (Γ.obj (op X)) r.unop).1
simp only [← Category.assoc]
erw [X.toΓSpecCApp_spec r.unop]
convert X.toΓSpecCApp_spec s.unop
symm
apply X.presheaf.map_comp
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_c_basic_opens AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecCBasicOpens
/-- The canonical morphism of sheafed spaces from `X` to the spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps]
def toΓSpecSheafedSpace : X.toSheafedSpace ⟶ Spec.toSheafedSpace.obj (op (Γ.obj (op X))) where
base := X.toΓSpecBase
c :=
TopCat.Sheaf.restrictHomEquivHom (structureSheaf (Γ.obj (op X))).1 _ isBasis_basic_opens
X.toΓSpecCBasicOpens
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_SheafedSpace AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecSheafedSpace
-- Porting Note: Now need much more hand holding: all variables explicit, and need to tidy up
-- significantly, was `TopCat.Sheaf.extend_hom_app _ _ _ _`
theorem toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq :
X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace.c.app (op (basicOpen r)) = X.toΓSpecCApp r := by
have := TopCat.Sheaf.extend_hom_app (Spec.toSheafedSpace.obj (op (Γ.obj (op X)))).presheaf
((TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ X.toΓSpecBase).obj X.𝒪)
isBasis_basic_opens X.toΓSpecCBasicOpens r
dsimp at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_SheafedSpace_app_eq AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq
-- Porting note: need a helper lemma `toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec_assoc` to help compile
-- `toStalk_stalkMap_to_Γ_Spec`
@[reassoc] theorem toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec (r : Γ.obj (op X)) :
toOpen (Γ.obj (op X)) (basicOpen r) ≫ X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace.c.app (op (basicOpen r)) =
X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r :=
(X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq r).symm ▸ X.toΓSpecCApp_spec r
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec_SheafedSpace_app_spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec
/-- The map on stalks induced by the unit commutes with maps from `Γ(X)` to
stalks (in `Spec Γ(X)` and in `X`). -/
theorem toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec (x : X) :
toStalk _ _ ≫ PresheafedSpace.stalkMap X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace x = X.ΓToStalk x := by
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap]
erw [← toOpen_germ _ (basicOpen (1 : Γ.obj (op X)))
⟨X.toΓSpecFun x, by rw [basicOpen_one]; trivial⟩]
rw [← Category.assoc, Category.assoc (toOpen _ _)]
erw [stalkFunctor_map_germ]
rw [← Category.assoc, toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec]
unfold ΓToStalk
rw [← stalkPushforward_germ _ X.toΓSpecBase X.presheaf ⊤]
congr 1
change (X.toΓSpecBase _* X.presheaf).map le_top.hom.op ≫ _ = _
apply germ_res
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_stalk_stalk_map_to_Γ_Spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec
/-- The canonical morphism from `X` to the spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps! val_base]
def toΓSpec : X ⟶ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (Γ.obj (op X)) where
val := X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace
prop := by
intro x
let p : PrimeSpectrum (Γ.obj (op X)) := X.toΓSpecFun x
constructor
-- show stalk map is local hom ↓
let S := (structureSheaf _).presheaf.stalk p
rintro (t : S) ht
obtain ⟨⟨r, s⟩, he⟩ := IsLocalization.surj p.asIdeal.primeCompl t
dsimp at he
set t' := _
change t * t' = _ at he
apply isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left (y := t')
rw [he]
refine IsLocalization.map_units S (⟨r, ?_⟩ : p.asIdeal.primeCompl)
apply (not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk _ _ _).mpr
rw [← toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec]
erw [comp_apply, ← he]
rw [RingHom.map_mul]
-- Porting note: `IsLocalization.map_units` and the goal needs to be simplified before Lean
-- realize it is useful
have := IsLocalization.map_units (R := Γ.obj (op X)) S s
dsimp at this ⊢
exact ht.mul <| this.map _
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.to_Γ_Spec AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec
theorem comp_ring_hom_ext {X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u}} {R : CommRingCat.{u}} {f : R ⟶ Γ.obj (op X)}
{β : X ⟶ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R}
(w : X.toΓSpec.1.base ≫ (Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f).1.base = β.1.base)
(h :
∀ r : R,
f ≫ X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top : (Opens.map β.1.base).obj (basicOpen r) ⟶ _).op =
toOpen R (basicOpen r) ≫ β.1.c.app (op (basicOpen r))) :
X.toΓSpec ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f = β := by
ext1
-- Porting note: was `apply Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext`
refine Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext w ?_
intro r U
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_val_c_app]
erw [toOpen_comp_comap_assoc]
rw [Category.assoc]
erw [toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
exact h r
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
/-- `toSpecΓ _` is an isomorphism so these are mutually two-sided inverses. -/
theorem Γ_Spec_left_triangle : toSpecΓ (Γ.obj (op X)) ≫ X.toΓSpec.1.c.app (op ⊤) = 𝟙 _ := by
unfold toSpecΓ
rw [← toOpen_res _ (basicOpen (1 : Γ.obj (op X))) ⊤ (eqToHom basicOpen_one.symm)]
erw [Category.assoc]
rw [NatTrans.naturality, ← Category.assoc]
erw [X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec 1, ← Functor.map_comp]
convert eqToHom_map X.presheaf _; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_Spec_left_triangle AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_Spec_left_triangle
end LocallyRingedSpace
/-- The unit as a natural transformation. -/
def identityToΓSpec : 𝟭 LocallyRingedSpace.{u} ⟶ Γ.rightOp ⋙ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace where
app := LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec
naturality X Y f := by
symm
apply LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
· ext1 x
dsimp only [Spec.topMap, LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpecFun]
-- Porting note: Had to add the next four lines
rw [comp_apply]
dsimp [toΓSpecBase]
-- The next six lines were `rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]` before
-- leanprover/lean4#2644
have : (ContinuousMap.mk (toΓSpecFun Y) (toΓSpec_continuous _)) (f.val.base x)
= toΓSpecFun Y (f.val.base x) := by rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
erw [this]
have : (ContinuousMap.mk (toΓSpecFun X) (toΓSpec_continuous _)) x
= toΓSpecFun X x := by rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
erw [this]
dsimp [toΓSpecFun]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← LocalRing.comap_closedPoint (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.val x), ←
PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply, ← PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply]
congr 2
exact (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap_germ f.1 ⊤ ⟨x, trivial⟩).symm
· intro r
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_val_c_app, ← Category.assoc]
erw [Y.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec, f.1.c.naturality]
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.identity_to_Γ_Spec AlgebraicGeometry.identityToΓSpec
namespace ΓSpec
set_option backward.isDefEq.lazyWhnfCore false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12534
theorem left_triangle (X : LocallyRingedSpace) :
SpecΓIdentity.inv.app (Γ.obj (op X)) ≫ (identityToΓSpec.app X).val.c.app (op ⊤) = 𝟙 _ :=
X.Γ_Spec_left_triangle
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.left_triangle AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.left_triangle
/-- `SpecΓIdentity` is iso so these are mutually two-sided inverses. -/
theorem right_triangle (R : CommRingCat) :
identityToΓSpec.app (Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.obj <| op R) ≫
Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.map (SpecΓIdentity.inv.app R).op =
𝟙 _ := by
apply LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
· ext (p : PrimeSpectrum R)
dsimp
ext x
erw [← IsLocalization.AtPrime.to_map_mem_maximal_iff ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk p)
p.asIdeal x]
rfl
· intro r; apply toOpen_res
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.right_triangle AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.right_triangle
/-- The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from `CommRingᵒᵖ` to `LocallyRingedSpace`. -/
-- Porting note: `simps` cause a time out, so `Unit` and `counit` will be added manually
def locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction : Γ.rightOp ⊣ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.{u} :=
Adjunction.mkOfUnitCounit
{ unit := identityToΓSpec
counit := (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity).inv
left_triangle := by
ext X; erw [Category.id_comp]
exact congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op (left_triangle X)
right_triangle := by
ext R : 2
-- Porting note: a little bit hand holding
change identityToΓSpec.app _ ≫ 𝟙 _ ≫ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.map _ =
𝟙 _
simp_rw [Category.id_comp, show (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity).inv.app R =
(SpecΓIdentity.inv.app R.unop).op from rfl]
exact right_triangle R.unop
}
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_unit :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.unit = identityToΓSpec := rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction_unit AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_unit
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit = (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity.{u}).inv := rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction_counit AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit
@[simp]
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app (R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app R =
(toOpen R.unop ⊤).op := rfl
@[simp]
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app (op <| CommRingCat.of R) =
(toOpen R ⊤).op := rfl
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_apply
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : Γ.rightOp.obj X ⟶ R) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X R f =
identityToΓSpec.app X ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f.unop := rfl
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_apply'
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
(f : CommRingCat.of R ⟶ Γ.obj <| op X) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X (op <| CommRingCat.of R) (op f) =
identityToΓSpec.app X ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f := rfl
lemma toOpen_comp_locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_app
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
(f : Γ.rightOp.obj X ⟶ op (CommRingCat.of R)) (U) :
StructureSheaf.toOpen R U.unop ≫
(locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X (op <| CommRingCat.of R) f).1.c.app U =
f.unop ≫ X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top).op := by
rw [← StructureSheaf.toOpen_res _ _ _ (homOfLE le_top), Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality _ (homOfLE (le_top (a := U.unop))).op,
show (toOpen R ⊤) = (toOpen R ⊤).op.unop from rfl,
← locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app']
simp_rw [← Γ_map_op]
rw [← Γ.rightOp_map_unop, ← Category.assoc, ← unop_comp, ← Adjunction.homEquiv_counit,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
rfl
-- Porting Note: Commented
--attribute [local semireducible] Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace
/-- The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from `CommRingᵒᵖ` to `Scheme`. -/
def adjunction : Scheme.Γ.rightOp ⊣ Scheme.Spec :=
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.restrictFullyFaithful
Scheme.fullyFaithfulForgetToLocallyRingedSpace (Functor.FullyFaithful.id _)
(NatIso.ofComponents (fun X => Iso.refl _))
(NatIso.ofComponents (fun X => Iso.refl _))
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.adjunction AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction
theorem adjunction_homEquiv_apply {X : Scheme} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : (op <| Scheme.Γ.obj <| op X) ⟶ R) :
ΓSpec.adjunction.homEquiv X R f = locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X.1 R f := by
dsimp only [adjunction]
rw [Adjunction.restrictFullyFaithful_homEquiv_apply, Adjunction.homEquiv_unit]
simp
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.adjunction_hom_equiv_apply AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction_homEquiv_apply
theorem adjunction_homEquiv (X : Scheme) (R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ) :
ΓSpec.adjunction.homEquiv X R = locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X.1 R :=
Equiv.ext fun f => adjunction_homEquiv_apply f
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.adjunction_hom_equiv AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction_homEquiv
theorem adjunction_homEquiv_symm_apply {X : Scheme} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : X ⟶ Scheme.Spec.obj R) :
(ΓSpec.adjunction.homEquiv X R).symm f = (locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X.1 R).symm f :=
by rw [adjunction_homEquiv]; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.adjunction_hom_equiv_symm_apply AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction_homEquiv_symm_apply
set_option backward.isDefEq.lazyWhnfCore false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12534
@[simp]
theorem adjunction_counit_app {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ} :
ΓSpec.adjunction.counit.app R = locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app R := by
rw [← Adjunction.homEquiv_symm_id, ← Adjunction.homEquiv_symm_id,
adjunction_homEquiv_symm_apply]
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.adjunction_counit_app AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction_counit_app
@[simp]
theorem adjunction_unit_app {X : Scheme} :
ΓSpec.adjunction.unit.app X = locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.unit.app X.1 := by
rw [← Adjunction.homEquiv_id, ← Adjunction.homEquiv_id, adjunction_homEquiv_apply]; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.adjunction_unit_app AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction_unit_app
-- Porting Note: Commented
-- attribute [local semireducible] locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction ΓSpec.adjunction
instance isIso_locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit :
IsIso.{u + 1, u + 1} locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit :=
(NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity).isIso_inv
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.is_iso_LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction_counit AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.isIso_locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit
instance isIso_adjunction_counit : IsIso ΓSpec.adjunction.counit := by
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app
intro R
rw [adjunction_counit_app]
infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_Spec.is_iso_adjunction_counit AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.isIso_adjunction_counit
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/GammaSpecAdjunction.lean | 468 | 488 | theorem adjunction_unit_app_app_top (X : Scheme.{u}) :
(ΓSpec.adjunction.unit.app X).1.c.app (op ⊤) =
SpecΓIdentity.hom.app (X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤)) := by |
have := congr_app ΓSpec.adjunction.left_triangle X
dsimp at this
-- Porting note: Slightly changed some rewrites.
-- Originally:
-- rw [← is_iso.eq_comp_inv] at this
-- simp only [Γ_Spec.LocallyRingedSpace_adjunction_counit, nat_trans.op_app, category.id_comp,
-- Γ_Spec.adjunction_counit_app] at this
-- rw [← op_inv, nat_iso.inv_inv_app, quiver.hom.op_inj.eq_iff] at this
rw [← IsIso.eq_comp_inv] at this
simp only [adjunction_counit_app, locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit, NatIso.op_inv,
NatTrans.op_app, unop_op, Functor.id_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Functor.rightOp_obj,
Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace_obj, Γ_obj, Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_toSheafedSpace,
Spec.sheafedSpaceObj_carrier, Spec.sheafedSpaceObj_presheaf,
SpecΓIdentity_inv_app, Category.id_comp] at this
rw [← op_inv, Quiver.Hom.op_inj.eq_iff] at this
-- Note: changed from `rw` to `simp_rw` to improve performance
simp_rw [SpecΓIdentity_hom_app]
exact this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
#align_import measure_theory.measure.haar.of_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
/-!
# Additive Haar measure constructed from a basis
Given a basis of a finite-dimensional real vector space, we define the corresponding Lebesgue
measure, which gives measure `1` to the parallelepiped spanned by the basis.
## Main definitions
* `parallelepiped v` is the parallelepiped spanned by a finite family of vectors.
* `Basis.parallelepiped` is the parallelepiped associated to a basis, seen as a compact set with
nonempty interior.
* `Basis.addHaar` is the Lebesgue measure associated to a basis, giving measure `1` to the
corresponding parallelepiped.
In particular, we declare a `MeasureSpace` instance on any finite-dimensional inner product space,
by using the Lebesgue measure associated to some orthonormal basis (which is in fact independent
of the basis).
-/
open Set TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure FiniteDimensional
open scoped Pointwise
noncomputable section
variable {ι ι' E F : Type*}
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι] [Fintype ι']
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module ℝ F]
/-- The closed parallelepiped spanned by a finite family of vectors. -/
def parallelepiped (v : ι → E) : Set E :=
(fun t : ι → ℝ => ∑ i, t i • v i) '' Icc 0 1
#align parallelepiped parallelepiped
theorem mem_parallelepiped_iff (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
x ∈ parallelepiped v ↔ ∃ t ∈ Icc (0 : ι → ℝ) 1, x = ∑ i, t i • v i := by
simp [parallelepiped, eq_comm]
#align mem_parallelepiped_iff mem_parallelepiped_iff
theorem parallelepiped_basis_eq (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
parallelepiped b = {x | ∀ i, b.repr x i ∈ Set.Icc 0 1} := by
classical
ext x
simp_rw [mem_parallelepiped_iff, mem_setOf_eq, b.ext_elem_iff, _root_.map_sum,
_root_.map_smul, Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single, smul_eq_mul,
mul_one, Finsupp.single_apply, Finset.sum_ite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, mem_Icc,
Pi.le_def, Pi.zero_apply, Pi.one_apply, ← forall_and]
aesop
theorem image_parallelepiped (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] F) (v : ι → E) :
f '' parallelepiped v = parallelepiped (f ∘ v) := by
simp only [parallelepiped, ← image_comp]
congr 1 with t
simp only [Function.comp_apply, _root_.map_sum, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply]
#align image_parallelepiped image_parallelepiped
/-- Reindexing a family of vectors does not change their parallelepiped. -/
@[simp]
theorem parallelepiped_comp_equiv (v : ι → E) (e : ι' ≃ ι) :
parallelepiped (v ∘ e) = parallelepiped v := by
simp only [parallelepiped]
let K : (ι' → ℝ) ≃ (ι → ℝ) := Equiv.piCongrLeft' (fun _a : ι' => ℝ) e
have : Icc (0 : ι → ℝ) 1 = K '' Icc (0 : ι' → ℝ) 1 := by
rw [← Equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image]
ext x
simp only [K, mem_preimage, mem_Icc, Pi.le_def, Pi.zero_apply, Equiv.piCongrLeft'_apply,
Pi.one_apply]
refine
⟨fun h => ⟨fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_⟩, fun h =>
⟨fun i => h.1 (e.symm i), fun i => h.2 (e.symm i)⟩⟩
· simpa only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply] using h.1 (e i)
· simpa only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply] using h.2 (e i)
rw [this, ← image_comp]
congr 1 with x
have := fun z : ι' → ℝ => e.symm.sum_comp fun i => z i • v (e i)
simp_rw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply] at this
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mem_image, mem_Icc, K, Equiv.piCongrLeft'_apply, this]
#align parallelepiped_comp_equiv parallelepiped_comp_equiv
-- The parallelepiped associated to an orthonormal basis of `ℝ` is either `[0, 1]` or `[-1, 0]`.
theorem parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ ℝ) :
parallelepiped b = Icc 0 1 ∨ parallelepiped b = Icc (-1) 0 := by
have e : ι ≃ Fin 1 := by
apply Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq
simp only [← finrank_eq_card_basis b.toBasis, finrank_self]
have B : parallelepiped (b.reindex e) = parallelepiped b := by
convert parallelepiped_comp_equiv b e.symm
ext i
simp only [OrthonormalBasis.coe_reindex]
rw [← B]
let F : ℝ → Fin 1 → ℝ := fun t => fun _i => t
have A : Icc (0 : Fin 1 → ℝ) 1 = F '' Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro x hx
refine ⟨x 0, ⟨hx.1 0, hx.2 0⟩, ?_⟩
ext j
simp only [Subsingleton.elim j 0]
· rintro x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun _j => hy.1, fun _j => hy.2⟩
rcases orthonormalBasis_one_dim (b.reindex e) with (H | H)
· left
simp_rw [parallelepiped, H, A, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
simp only [Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, Finset.sum_singleton,
← image_comp, Function.comp_apply, image_id', ge_iff_le, zero_le_one, not_true, gt_iff_lt]
· right
simp_rw [H, parallelepiped, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, A]
simp only [F, Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, mul_neg, mul_one, Finset.sum_neg_distrib,
Finset.sum_singleton, ← image_comp, Function.comp, image_neg, preimage_neg_Icc, neg_zero]
#align parallelepiped_orthonormal_basis_one_dim parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim
theorem parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment (v : ι → E) : parallelepiped v = ∑ i, segment ℝ 0 (v i) := by
ext
simp only [mem_parallelepiped_iff, Set.mem_finset_sum, Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left,
segment_eq_image, smul_zero, zero_add, ← Set.pi_univ_Icc, Set.mem_univ_pi]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t • v, fun {i} => ⟨t i, ht _, by simp⟩, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
choose t ht hg using @hg
refine ⟨@t, @ht, ?_⟩
simp_rw [hg]
#align parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment
theorem convex_parallelepiped (v : ι → E) : Convex ℝ (parallelepiped v) := by
rw [parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment]
exact convex_sum _ fun _i _hi => convex_segment _ _
#align convex_parallelepiped convex_parallelepiped
/-- A `parallelepiped` is the convex hull of its vertices -/
theorem parallelepiped_eq_convexHull (v : ι → E) :
parallelepiped v = convexHull ℝ (∑ i, {(0 : E), v i}) := by
simp_rw [convexHull_sum, convexHull_pair, parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment]
#align parallelepiped_eq_convex_hull parallelepiped_eq_convexHull
/-- The axis aligned parallelepiped over `ι → ℝ` is a cuboid. -/
theorem parallelepiped_single [DecidableEq ι] (a : ι → ℝ) :
(parallelepiped fun i => Pi.single i (a i)) = Set.uIcc 0 a := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.uIcc, mem_parallelepiped_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Pi.le_def, ← forall_and, Pi.inf_apply,
Pi.sup_apply, ← Pi.single_smul', Pi.one_apply, Pi.zero_apply, ← Pi.smul_apply',
Finset.univ_sum_single (_ : ι → ℝ)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ i
specialize ht i
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, Pi.mul_apply]
rcases le_total (a i) 0 with hai | hai
· rw [sup_eq_left.mpr hai, inf_eq_right.mpr hai]
exact ⟨le_mul_of_le_one_left hai ht.2, mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ht.1 hai⟩
· rw [sup_eq_right.mpr hai, inf_eq_left.mpr hai]
exact ⟨mul_nonneg ht.1 hai, mul_le_of_le_one_left hai ht.2⟩
· intro h
refine ⟨fun i => x i / a i, fun i => ?_, funext fun i => ?_⟩
· specialize h i
rcases le_total (a i) 0 with hai | hai
· rw [sup_eq_left.mpr hai, inf_eq_right.mpr hai] at h
exact ⟨div_nonneg_of_nonpos h.2 hai, div_le_one_of_ge h.1 hai⟩
· rw [sup_eq_right.mpr hai, inf_eq_left.mpr hai] at h
exact ⟨div_nonneg h.1 hai, div_le_one_of_le h.2 hai⟩
· specialize h i
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.mul_apply]
rcases eq_or_ne (a i) 0 with hai | hai
· rw [hai, inf_idem, sup_idem, ← le_antisymm_iff] at h
rw [hai, ← h, zero_div, zero_mul]
· rw [div_mul_cancel₀ _ hai]
#align parallelepiped_single parallelepiped_single
end AddCommGroup
section NormedSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The parallelepiped spanned by a basis, as a compact set with nonempty interior. -/
def Basis.parallelepiped (b : Basis ι ℝ E) : PositiveCompacts E where
carrier := _root_.parallelepiped b
isCompact' := IsCompact.image isCompact_Icc
(continuous_finset_sum Finset.univ fun (i : ι) (_H : i ∈ Finset.univ) =>
(continuous_apply i).smul continuous_const)
interior_nonempty' := by
suffices H : Set.Nonempty (interior (b.equivFunL.symm.toHomeomorph '' Icc 0 1)) by
dsimp only [_root_.parallelepiped]
convert H
exact (b.equivFun_symm_apply _).symm
have A : Set.Nonempty (interior (Icc (0 : ι → ℝ) 1)) := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc, interior_pi_set (@finite_univ ι _)]
simp only [univ_pi_nonempty_iff, Pi.zero_apply, Pi.one_apply, interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo,
zero_lt_one, imp_true_iff]
rwa [← Homeomorph.image_interior, image_nonempty]
#align basis.parallelepiped Basis.parallelepiped
@[simp]
theorem Basis.coe_parallelepiped (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
(b.parallelepiped : Set E) = _root_.parallelepiped b := rfl
#align basis.coe_parallelepiped Basis.coe_parallelepiped
@[simp]
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_reindex (b : Basis ι ℝ E) (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(b.reindex e).parallelepiped = b.parallelepiped :=
PositiveCompacts.ext <|
(congr_arg _root_.parallelepiped (b.coe_reindex e)).trans (parallelepiped_comp_equiv b e.symm)
#align basis.parallelepiped_reindex Basis.parallelepiped_reindex
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_map (b : Basis ι ℝ E) (e : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] F) :
(b.map e).parallelepiped = b.parallelepiped.map e
(have := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b
-- Porting note: Lean cannot infer the instance above
LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional e.toLinearMap)
(have := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis (b.map e)
-- Porting note: Lean cannot infer the instance above
LinearMap.isOpenMap_of_finiteDimensional _ e.surjective) :=
PositiveCompacts.ext (image_parallelepiped e.toLinearMap _).symm
#align basis.parallelepiped_map Basis.parallelepiped_map
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
theorem Basis.prod_parallelepiped (v : Basis ι ℝ E) (w : Basis ι' ℝ F) :
(v.prod w).parallelepiped = v.parallelepiped.prod w.parallelepiped := by
ext x
simp only [Basis.coe_parallelepiped, TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.coe_prod, Set.mem_prod,
mem_parallelepiped_iff]
constructor
· intro h
rcases h with ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩
constructor
· use t ∘ Sum.inl
constructor
· exact ⟨(ht1.1 <| Sum.inl ·), (ht1.2 <| Sum.inl ·)⟩
simp [ht2, Prod.fst_sum, Prod.snd_sum]
· use t ∘ Sum.inr
constructor
· exact ⟨(ht1.1 <| Sum.inr ·), (ht1.2 <| Sum.inr ·)⟩
simp [ht2, Prod.fst_sum, Prod.snd_sum]
intro h
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩, ⟨s, hs1, hs2⟩⟩
use Sum.elim t s
constructor
· constructor
· change ∀ x : ι ⊕ ι', 0 ≤ Sum.elim t s x
aesop
· change ∀ x : ι ⊕ ι', Sum.elim t s x ≤ 1
aesop
ext
· simp [ht2, Prod.fst_sum]
· simp [hs2, Prod.snd_sum]
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
/-- The Lebesgue measure associated to a basis, giving measure `1` to the parallelepiped spanned
by the basis. -/
irreducible_def Basis.addHaar (b : Basis ι ℝ E) : Measure E :=
Measure.addHaarMeasure b.parallelepiped
#align basis.add_haar Basis.addHaar
instance IsAddHaarMeasure_basis_addHaar (b : Basis ι ℝ E) : IsAddHaarMeasure b.addHaar := by
rw [Basis.addHaar]; exact Measure.isAddHaarMeasure_addHaarMeasure _
#align is_add_haar_measure_basis_add_haar IsAddHaarMeasure_basis_addHaar
instance (b : Basis ι ℝ E) : SigmaFinite b.addHaar := by
have : FiniteDimensional ℝ E := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b
rw [Basis.addHaar_def]; exact sigmaFinite_addHaarMeasure
/-- Let `μ` be a σ-finite left invariant measure on `E`. Then `μ` is equal to the Haar measure
defined by `b` iff the parallelepiped defined by `b` has measure `1` for `μ`. -/
theorem Basis.addHaar_eq_iff [SecondCountableTopology E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) (μ : Measure E)
[SigmaFinite μ] [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] :
b.addHaar = μ ↔ μ b.parallelepiped = 1 := by
rw [Basis.addHaar_def]
exact addHaarMeasure_eq_iff b.parallelepiped μ
@[simp]
theorem Basis.addHaar_reindex (b : Basis ι ℝ E) (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(b.reindex e).addHaar = b.addHaar := by
rw [Basis.addHaar, b.parallelepiped_reindex e, ← Basis.addHaar]
theorem Basis.addHaar_self (b : Basis ι ℝ E) : b.addHaar (_root_.parallelepiped b) = 1 := by
rw [Basis.addHaar]; exact addHaarMeasure_self
#align basis.add_haar_self Basis.addHaar_self
variable [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopologyEither E F]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/OfBasis.lean | 297 | 301 | theorem Basis.prod_addHaar (v : Basis ι ℝ E) (w : Basis ι' ℝ F) :
(v.prod w).addHaar = v.addHaar.prod w.addHaar := by |
have : FiniteDimensional ℝ E := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis v
have : FiniteDimensional ℝ F := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis w
simp [(v.prod w).addHaar_eq_iff, Basis.prod_parallelepiped, Basis.addHaar_self]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.nonsingular_inverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"722b3b152ddd5e0cf21c0a29787c76596cb6b422"
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible determinant.
For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a more general notion of
pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
We show that dividing the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`),
will result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
Note that there are at least three different inverses in mathlib:
* `A⁻¹` (`Inv.inv`): alone, this satisfies no properties, although it is usually used in
conjunction with `Group` or `GroupWithZero`. On matrices, this is defined to be zero when no
inverse exists.
* `⅟A` (`invOf`): this is only available in the presence of `[Invertible A]`, which guarantees an
inverse exists.
* `Ring.inverse A`: this is defined on any `MonoidWithZero`, and just like `⁻¹` on matrices, is
defined to be zero when no inverse exists.
We start by working with `Invertible`, and show the main results:
* `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible`
* `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible`
* `Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det`
* `Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm`
After this we define `Matrix.inv` and show it matches `⅟A` and `Ring.inverse A`.
The rest of the results in the file are then about `A⁻¹`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u u' v
variable {l : Type*} {m : Type u} {n : Type u'} {α : Type v}
open Matrix Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
/-! ### Matrices are `Invertible` iff their determinants are -/
section Invertible
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertibleOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : Invertible A where
invOf := ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [smul_mul_assoc, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
#align matrix.invertible_of_det_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible
theorem invOf_eq [Invertible A.det] [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate := by
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
convert (rfl : ⅟ A = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_eq Matrix.invOf_eq
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
#align matrix.det_invertible_of_left_inverse Matrix.detInvertibleOfLeftInverse
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
#align matrix.det_invertible_of_right_inverse Matrix.detInvertibleOfRightInverse
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def detInvertibleOfInvertible [Invertible A] : Invertible A.det :=
detInvertibleOfLeftInverse A (⅟ A) (invOf_mul_self _)
#align matrix.det_invertible_of_invertible Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible
theorem det_invOf [Invertible A] [Invertible A.det] : (⅟ A).det = ⅟ A.det := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
convert (rfl : _ = ⅟ A.det)
#align matrix.det_inv_of Matrix.det_invOf
/-- Together `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def invertibleEquivDetInvertible : Invertible A ≃ Invertible A.det where
toFun := @detInvertibleOfInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
invFun := @invertibleOfDetInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.invertible_equiv_det_invertible Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible
variable {A B}
theorem mul_eq_one_comm : A * B = 1 ↔ B * A = 1 :=
suffices ∀ A B : Matrix n n α, A * B = 1 → B * A = 1 from ⟨this A B, this B A⟩
fun A B h => by
letI : Invertible B.det := detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
letI : Invertible B := invertibleOfDetInvertible B
calc
B * A = B * A * (B * ⅟ B) := by rw [mul_invOf_self, Matrix.mul_one]
_ = B * (A * B * ⅟ B) := by simp only [Matrix.mul_assoc]
_ = B * ⅟ B := by rw [h, Matrix.one_mul]
_ = 1 := mul_invOf_self B
#align matrix.mul_eq_one_comm Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm
variable (A B)
/-- We can construct an instance of invertible A if A has a left inverse. -/
def invertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A :=
⟨B, h, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h⟩
#align matrix.invertible_of_left_inverse Matrix.invertibleOfLeftInverse
/-- We can construct an instance of invertible A if A has a right inverse. -/
def invertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A :=
⟨B, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h, h⟩
#align matrix.invertible_of_right_inverse Matrix.invertibleOfRightInverse
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `(Matrix n n α)ˣ`-/
def unitOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ A (invertibleOfDetInvertible A)
#align matrix.unit_of_det_invertible Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_det : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, (invertibleEquivDetInvertible A).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_iff_is_unit_det Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det
@[simp]
theorem isUnits_det_units (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : IsUnit (A : Matrix n n α).det :=
isUnit_iff_isUnit_det _ |>.mp A.isUnit
/-! #### Variants of the statements above with `IsUnit`-/
theorem isUnit_det_of_invertible [Invertible A] : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfInvertible A)
#align matrix.is_unit_det_of_invertible Matrix.isUnit_det_of_invertible
variable {A B}
theorem isUnit_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A :=
⟨⟨A, B, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h, h⟩, rfl⟩
#align matrix.is_unit_of_left_inverse Matrix.isUnit_of_left_inverse
theorem exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit : (∃ B, B * A = 1) ↔ IsUnit A :=
⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ isUnit_of_left_inverse h, fun h ↦ have := h.invertible; ⟨⅟A, invOf_mul_self' A⟩⟩
theorem isUnit_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A :=
⟨⟨A, B, h, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h⟩, rfl⟩
#align matrix.is_unit_of_right_inverse Matrix.isUnit_of_right_inverse
theorem exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit : (∃ B, A * B = 1) ↔ IsUnit A :=
⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ isUnit_of_right_inverse h, fun h ↦ have := h.invertible; ⟨⅟A, mul_invOf_self' A⟩⟩
theorem isUnit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h)
#align matrix.is_unit_det_of_left_inverse Matrix.isUnit_det_of_left_inverse
theorem isUnit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfRightInverse _ _ h)
#align matrix.is_unit_det_of_right_inverse Matrix.isUnit_det_of_right_inverse
theorem det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : B * A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h).ne_zero
#align matrix.det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse Matrix.det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse
theorem det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : A * B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_right_inverse h).ne_zero
#align matrix.det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse Matrix.det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse
end Invertible
section Inv
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem isUnit_det_transpose (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit Aᵀ.det := by
rw [det_transpose]
exact h
#align matrix.is_unit_det_transpose Matrix.isUnit_det_transpose
/-! ### A noncomputable `Inv` instance -/
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise). -/
noncomputable instance inv : Inv (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨fun A => Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
theorem inv_def (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate :=
rfl
#align matrix.inv_def Matrix.inv_def
theorem nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit (h : ¬IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_apply_not_is_unit Matrix.nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit
theorem nonsing_inv_apply (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate := by
rw [inv_def, ← Ring.inverse_unit h.unit, IsUnit.unit_spec]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_apply Matrix.nonsing_inv_apply
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as `invOf` when `A` is invertible. -/
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_nonsing_inv [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_eq]
#align matrix.inv_of_eq_nonsing_inv Matrix.invOf_eq_nonsing_inv
/-- Coercing the result of `Units.instInv` is the same as coercing first and applying the
nonsingular inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_units_inv (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : ↑A⁻¹ = (A⁻¹ : Matrix n n α) := by
letI := A.invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_units]
#align matrix.coe_units_inv Matrix.coe_units_inv
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as the general `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A := by
by_cases h_det : IsUnit A.det
· cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h_det).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, Ring.inverse_invertible]
· have h := mt A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h_det
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit A h_det]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse Matrix.nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse
theorem transpose_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹ᵀ = Aᵀ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
#align matrix.transpose_nonsing_inv Matrix.transpose_nonsing_inv
theorem conjTranspose_nonsing_inv [StarRing α] : A⁻¹ᴴ = Aᴴ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, conjTranspose_smul, det_conjTranspose, adjugate_conjTranspose,
Ring.inverse_star]
#align matrix.conj_transpose_nonsing_inv Matrix.conjTranspose_nonsing_inv
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * A⁻¹ = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, mul_invOf_self]
#align matrix.mul_nonsing_inv Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * A = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_mul_self]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_mul Matrix.nonsing_inv_mul
instance [Invertible A] : Invertible A⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A := by
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_invOf]
#align matrix.inv_inv_of_invertible Matrix.inv_inv_of_invertible
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A * A⁻¹ = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
#align matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
#align matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A⁻¹ * A = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right Matrix.nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left Matrix.nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A * A⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_nonsing_inv A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
#align matrix.mul_inv_of_invertible Matrix.mul_inv_of_invertible
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * A = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_mul A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
#align matrix.inv_mul_of_invertible Matrix.inv_mul_of_invertible
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A * A⁻¹ = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
#align matrix.mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible Matrix.mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
#align matrix.mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible Matrix.mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A⁻¹ * A = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
#align matrix.inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible Matrix.inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
#align matrix.inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible Matrix.inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
A⁻¹ * B = C ↔ B = A * C :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible]⟩
#align matrix.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible Matrix.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
B * A⁻¹ = C ↔ B = C * A :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible]⟩
#align matrix.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible Matrix.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible
lemma mul_right_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix n m α) => A * x) :=
fun _ _ h => by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible] using congr_arg (A⁻¹ * ·) h
lemma mul_left_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix m n α) => x * A) :=
fun a x hax => by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible] using congr_arg (· * A⁻¹) hax
lemma mul_right_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix n m α} : A * x = A * y ↔ x = y :=
(mul_right_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
lemma mul_left_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix m n α} : x * A = y * A ↔ x = y :=
(mul_left_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
end Inv
section InjectiveMul
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommRing α]
variable [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l]
lemma mul_left_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix l m α => x * A) := fun _ _ g => by
simpa only [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_one, h] using congr_arg (· * B) g
lemma mul_right_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix m l α => B * x) :=
fun _ _ g => by simpa only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.one_mul, h] using congr_arg (A * ·) g
end InjectiveMul
section vecMul
variable [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse [Fintype m] [Finite n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, B * A = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨y ᵥ* B, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose rows hrows using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨Matrix.of rows, Matrix.ext fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [mul_apply_eq_vecMul, one_eq_pi_single, ← hrows]
rfl
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse [Finite m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, A * B = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨B *ᵥ y, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose cols hcols using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨(Matrix.of cols)ᵀ, Matrix.ext fun i j ↦ ?_⟩
rw [one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm, ← hcols j]
rfl
end Semiring
variable {R K : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Fintype m]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse, exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse, exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit]
exact LinearMap.surjective_of_injective (f := A.vecMulLinear) h
change Function.Injective A.vecMulLinear
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
intro c hc
replace h := h.invertible
simpa using congr_arg A⁻¹.vecMulLinear hc
theorem mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← isUnit_transpose, ← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit]
simp_rw [vecMul_transpose]
theorem linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K (fun i ↦ A i) ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← transpose_transpose A, ← mulVec_injective_iff, ← coe_mulVecLin, mulVecLin_transpose,
transpose_transpose, ← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit, coe_vecMulLinear]
theorem linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K (fun i ↦ Aᵀ i) ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← transpose_transpose A, isUnit_transpose, linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit,
transpose_transpose]
theorem vecMul_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem vecMul_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_rows_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K (fun i ↦ A i) :=
linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_cols_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K (fun i ↦ Aᵀ i) :=
linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
end vecMul
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero : A⁻¹ * A = 1 ∧ A * A⁻¹ = 1 ∨ A⁻¹ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· exact Or.inl ⟨nonsing_inv_mul _ h, mul_nonsing_inv _ h⟩
· exact Or.inr (nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h)
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero Matrix.nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero
theorem det_nonsing_inv_mul_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹.det * A.det = 1 := by
rw [← det_mul, A.nonsing_inv_mul h, det_one]
#align matrix.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det Matrix.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det
@[simp]
theorem det_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹.det = Ring.inverse A.det := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, det_invOf]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· rw [det_isEmpty, det_isEmpty, Ring.inverse_one]
· rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h, det_zero ‹_›]
#align matrix.det_nonsing_inv Matrix.det_nonsing_inv
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit A⁻¹.det :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (A.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det h)
#align matrix.is_unit_nonsing_inv_det Matrix.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A :=
calc
A⁻¹⁻¹ = 1 * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [Matrix.one_mul]
_ = A * A⁻¹ * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [A.mul_nonsing_inv h]
_ = A := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, A⁻¹.mul_nonsing_inv (A.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det h), Matrix.mul_one]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv Matrix.nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹.det ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
rw [Matrix.det_nonsing_inv, isUnit_ring_inverse]
#align matrix.is_unit_nonsing_inv_det_iff Matrix.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff
-- `IsUnit.invertible` lifts the proposition `IsUnit A` to a constructive inverse of `A`.
/-- A version of `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is
therefore noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def invertibleOfIsUnitDet (h : IsUnit A.det) : Invertible A :=
⟨A⁻¹, nonsing_inv_mul A h, mul_nonsing_inv A h⟩
#align matrix.invertible_of_is_unit_det Matrix.invertibleOfIsUnitDet
/-- A version of `Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is therefore
noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def nonsingInvUnit (h : IsUnit A.det) : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ _ (invertibleOfIsUnitDet A h)
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_unit Matrix.nonsingInvUnit
theorem unitOfDetInvertible_eq_nonsingInvUnit [Invertible A.det] :
unitOfDetInvertible A = nonsingInvUnit A (isUnit_of_invertible _) := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.unit_of_det_invertible_eq_nonsing_inv_unit Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible_eq_nonsingInvUnit
variable {A} {B}
/-- If matrix A is left invertible, then its inverse equals its left inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
letI := invertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
invOf_eq_nonsing_inv A ▸ invOf_eq_left_inv h
#align matrix.inv_eq_left_inv Matrix.inv_eq_left_inv
/-- If matrix A is right invertible, then its inverse equals its right inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
inv_eq_left_inv (mul_eq_one_comm.2 h)
#align matrix.inv_eq_right_inv Matrix.inv_eq_right_inv
section InvEqInv
variable {C : Matrix n n α}
/-- The left inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem left_inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_left_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
#align matrix.left_inv_eq_left_inv Matrix.left_inv_eq_left_inv
/-- The right inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : A * C = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_right_inv g]
#align matrix.right_inv_eq_right_inv Matrix.right_inv_eq_right_inv
/-- The right inverse of matrix A equals the left inverse of A when they exist. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_left_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
#align matrix.right_inv_eq_left_inv Matrix.right_inv_eq_left_inv
theorem inv_inj (h : A⁻¹ = B⁻¹) (h' : IsUnit A.det) : A = B := by
refine left_inv_eq_left_inv (mul_nonsing_inv _ h') ?_
rw [h]
refine mul_nonsing_inv _ ?_
rwa [← isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, ← h, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
#align matrix.inv_inj Matrix.inv_inj
end InvEqInv
variable (A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_zero : (0 : Matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 0 := by
cases' subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with ht ht
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rcases (Fintype.card n).zero_le.eq_or_lt with hc | hc
· rw [eq_comm, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hc
haveI := hc
ext i
exact (IsEmpty.false i).elim
· have hn : Nonempty n := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp hc
refine nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ ?_
simp [hn]
#align matrix.inv_zero Matrix.inv_zero
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.one, Matrix.inv with inv_one := inv_eq_left_inv (by simp) }
theorem inv_smul (k : α) [Invertible k] (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = ⅟ k • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
#align matrix.inv_smul Matrix.inv_smul
theorem inv_smul' (k : αˣ) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = k⁻¹ • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
#align matrix.inv_smul' Matrix.inv_smul'
theorem inv_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (adjugate A)⁻¹ = h.unit⁻¹ • A := by
refine inv_eq_left_inv ?_
rw [smul_mul, mul_adjugate, Units.smul_def, smul_smul, h.val_inv_mul, one_smul]
#align matrix.inv_adjugate Matrix.inv_adjugate
section Diagonal
/-- `diagonal v` is invertible if `v` is -/
def diagonalInvertible {α} [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] :
Invertible (diagonal v) :=
Invertible.map (diagonalRingHom n α) v
#align matrix.diagonal_invertible Matrix.diagonalInvertible
theorem invOf_diagonal_eq {α} [Semiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] [Invertible (diagonal v)] :
⅟ (diagonal v) = diagonal (⅟ v) := by
letI := diagonalInvertible v
-- Porting note: no longer need `haveI := Invertible.subsingleton (diagonal v)`
convert (rfl : ⅟ (diagonal v) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_diagonal_eq Matrix.invOf_diagonal_eq
/-- `v` is invertible if `diagonal v` is -/
def invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible (v : n → α) [Invertible (diagonal v)] : Invertible v where
invOf := diag (⅟ (diagonal v))
invOf_mul_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_assoc, prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
mul_invOf_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_prod_erase _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
#align matrix.invertible_of_diagonal_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible
/-- Together `Matrix.diagonalInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible (v : n → α) : Invertible (diagonal v) ≃ Invertible v where
toFun := @invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
invFun := @diagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.diagonal_invertible_equiv_invertible Matrix.diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_diagonal {v : n → α} : IsUnit (diagonal v) ↔ IsUnit v := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible v).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_diagonal Matrix.isUnit_diagonal
theorem inv_diagonal (v : n → α) : (diagonal v)⁻¹ = diagonal (Ring.inverse v) := by
rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse]
by_cases h : IsUnit v
· have := isUnit_diagonal.mpr h
cases this.nonempty_invertible
cases h.nonempty_invertible
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_diagonal_eq]
· have := isUnit_diagonal.not.mpr h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Pi.zero_def, diagonal_zero, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this]
#align matrix.inv_diagonal Matrix.inv_diagonal
end Diagonal
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_inv (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹⁻¹⁻¹ = A⁻¹ := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· rw [nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv _ h]
· simp [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
#align matrix.inv_inv_inv Matrix.inv_inv_inv
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_add_inv'` -/
theorem inv_add_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ + B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (A + B) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse] using Ring.inverse_add_inverse h
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_sub_inv'` -/
theorem inv_sub_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ - B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (B - A) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse] using Ring.inverse_sub_inverse h
theorem mul_inv_rev (A B : Matrix n n α) : (A * B)⁻¹ = B⁻¹ * A⁻¹ := by
simp only [inv_def]
rw [Matrix.smul_mul, Matrix.mul_smul, smul_smul, det_mul, adjugate_mul_distrib,
Ring.mul_inverse_rev]
#align matrix.mul_inv_rev Matrix.mul_inv_rev
/-- A version of `List.prod_inv_reverse` for `Matrix.inv`. -/
theorem list_prod_inv_reverse : ∀ l : List (Matrix n n α), l.prod⁻¹ = (l.reverse.map Inv.inv).prod
| [] => by rw [List.reverse_nil, List.map_nil, List.prod_nil, inv_one]
| A::Xs => by
rw [List.reverse_cons', List.map_concat, List.prod_concat, List.prod_cons,
mul_inv_rev, list_prod_inv_reverse Xs]
#align matrix.list_prod_inv_reverse Matrix.list_prod_inv_reverse
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • A⁻¹ *ᵥ b = cramer A b := by
rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec, A.nonsing_inv_apply h, ← smul_mulVec_assoc, smul_smul,
h.mul_val_inv, one_smul]
#align matrix.det_smul_inv_mul_vec_eq_cramer Matrix.det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_vecMul_eq_cramer_transpose (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • b ᵥ* A⁻¹ = cramer Aᵀ b := by
rw [← A⁻¹.transpose_transpose, vecMul_transpose, transpose_nonsing_inv, ← det_transpose,
Aᵀ.det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer _ (isUnit_det_transpose A h)]
#align matrix.det_smul_inv_vec_mul_eq_cramer_transpose Matrix.det_smul_inv_vecMul_eq_cramer_transpose
/-! ### Inverses of permutated matrices
Note that the simp-normal form of `Matrix.reindex` is `Matrix.submatrix`, so we prove most of these
results about only the latter.
-/
section Submatrix
variable [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- `A.submatrix e₁ e₂` is invertible if `A` is -/
def submatrixEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) [Invertible A] :
Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ ((⅟ A).submatrix e₂ e₁) <| by
rw [Matrix.submatrix_mul_equiv, mul_invOf_self, submatrix_one_equiv]
#align matrix.submatrix_equiv_invertible Matrix.submatrixEquivInvertible
/-- `A` is invertible if `A.submatrix e₁ e₂` is -/
def invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m)
[Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)] : Invertible A :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ ((⅟ (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)).submatrix e₂.symm e₁.symm) <| by
have : A = (A.submatrix e₁ e₂).submatrix e₁.symm e₂.symm := by simp
-- Porting note: was
-- conv in _ * _ =>
-- congr
-- rw [this]
rw [congr_arg₂ (· * ·) this rfl]
rw [Matrix.submatrix_mul_equiv, mul_invOf_self, submatrix_one_equiv]
#align matrix.invertible_of_submatrix_equiv_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible
theorem invOf_submatrix_equiv_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) [Invertible A]
[Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)] : ⅟ (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) = (⅟ A).submatrix e₂ e₁ := by
letI := submatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂
-- Porting note: no longer need `haveI := Invertible.subsingleton (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)`
convert (rfl : ⅟ (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_submatrix_equiv_eq Matrix.invOf_submatrix_equiv_eq
/-- Together `Matrix.submatrixEquivInvertible` and
`Matrix.invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible` form an equivalence, although both sides of the
equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def submatrixEquivInvertibleEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) :
Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) ≃ Invertible A where
toFun _ := invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂
invFun _ := submatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.submatrix_equiv_invertible_equiv_invertible Matrix.submatrixEquivInvertibleEquivInvertible
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_submatrix_equiv {A : Matrix m m α} (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) :
IsUnit (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) ↔ IsUnit A := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(submatrixEquivInvertibleEquivInvertible A _ _).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_submatrix_equiv Matrix.isUnit_submatrix_equiv
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/NonsingularInverse.lean | 772 | 780 | theorem inv_submatrix_equiv (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) :
(A.submatrix e₁ e₂)⁻¹ = A⁻¹.submatrix e₂ e₁ := by |
by_cases h : IsUnit A
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := submatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_submatrix_equiv_eq A]
· have := (isUnit_submatrix_equiv e₁ e₂).not.mpr h
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this,
submatrix_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.GaussSum
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.quadratic_reciprocity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
/-!
# Quadratic reciprocity.
## Main results
We prove the law of quadratic reciprocity, see `legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity` and
`legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity'`, as well as the
interpretations in terms of existence of square roots depending on the congruence mod 4,
`ZMod.exists_sq_eq_prime_iff_of_mod_four_eq_one` and
`ZMod.exists_sq_eq_prime_iff_of_mod_four_eq_three`.
We also prove the supplementary laws that give conditions for when `2` or `-2`
is a square modulo a prime `p`:
`legendreSym.at_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff` for `2` and
`legendreSym.at_neg_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff` for `-2`.
## Implementation notes
The proofs use results for quadratic characters on arbitrary finite fields
from `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.GaussSum`, which in turn are based on
properties of quadratic Gauss sums as provided by `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussSum`.
## Tags
quadratic residue, quadratic nonresidue, Legendre symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
open Nat
section Values
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
open ZMod
/-!
### The value of the Legendre symbol at `2` and `-2`
See `jacobiSym.at_two` and `jacobiSym.at_neg_two` for the corresponding statements
for the Jacobi symbol.
-/
namespace legendreSym
variable (hp : p ≠ 2)
/-- `legendreSym p 2` is given by `χ₈ p`. -/
theorem at_two : legendreSym p 2 = χ₈ p := by
have : (2 : ZMod p) = (2 : ℤ) := by norm_cast
rw [legendreSym, ← this, quadraticChar_two ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp), card p]
#align legendre_sym.at_two legendreSym.at_two
/-- `legendreSym p (-2)` is given by `χ₈' p`. -/
theorem at_neg_two : legendreSym p (-2) = χ₈' p := by
have : (-2 : ZMod p) = (-2 : ℤ) := by norm_cast
rw [legendreSym, ← this, quadraticChar_neg_two ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp), card p]
#align legendre_sym.at_neg_two legendreSym.at_neg_two
end legendreSym
namespace ZMod
variable (hp : p ≠ 2)
/-- `2` is a square modulo an odd prime `p` iff `p` is congruent to `1` or `7` mod `8`. -/
theorem exists_sq_eq_two_iff : IsSquare (2 : ZMod p) ↔ p % 8 = 1 ∨ p % 8 = 7 := by
rw [FiniteField.isSquare_two_iff, card p]
have h₁ := Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two.mpr hp
rw [← mod_mod_of_dvd p (by decide : 2 ∣ 8)] at h₁
have h₂ := mod_lt p (by norm_num : 0 < 8)
revert h₂ h₁
generalize p % 8 = m; clear! p
intros; interval_cases m <;> simp_all -- Porting note (#11043): was `decide!`
#align zmod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff ZMod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff
/-- `-2` is a square modulo an odd prime `p` iff `p` is congruent to `1` or `3` mod `8`. -/
theorem exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff : IsSquare (-2 : ZMod p) ↔ p % 8 = 1 ∨ p % 8 = 3 := by
rw [FiniteField.isSquare_neg_two_iff, card p]
have h₁ := Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two.mpr hp
rw [← mod_mod_of_dvd p (by decide : 2 ∣ 8)] at h₁
have h₂ := mod_lt p (by norm_num : 0 < 8)
revert h₂ h₁
generalize p % 8 = m; clear! p
intros; interval_cases m <;> simp_all -- Porting note (#11043): was `decide!`
#align zmod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff
end ZMod
end Values
section Reciprocity
/-!
### The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity
See `jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity` and variants for a version of Quadratic Reciprocity
for the Jacobi symbol.
-/
variable {p q : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] [Fact q.Prime]
namespace legendreSym
open ZMod
/-- **The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity**: if `p` and `q` are distinct odd primes, then
`(q / p) * (p / q) = (-1)^((p-1)(q-1)/4)`. -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity (hp : p ≠ 2) (hq : q ≠ 2) (hpq : p ≠ q) :
legendreSym q p * legendreSym p q = (-1) ^ (p / 2 * (q / 2)) := by
have hp₁ := (Prime.eq_two_or_odd <| @Fact.out p.Prime _).resolve_left hp
have hq₁ := (Prime.eq_two_or_odd <| @Fact.out q.Prime _).resolve_left hq
have hq₂ : ringChar (ZMod q) ≠ 2 := (ringChar_zmod_n q).substr hq
have h :=
quadraticChar_odd_prime ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp) hq ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hpq)
rw [card p] at h
have nc : ∀ n r : ℕ, ((n : ℤ) : ZMod r) = n := fun n r => by norm_cast
have nc' : (((-1) ^ (p / 2) : ℤ) : ZMod q) = (-1) ^ (p / 2) := by norm_cast
rw [legendreSym, legendreSym, nc, nc, h, map_mul, mul_rotate', mul_comm (p / 2), ← pow_two,
quadraticChar_sq_one (prime_ne_zero q p hpq.symm), mul_one, pow_mul, χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow hp₁, nc',
map_pow, quadraticChar_neg_one hq₂, card q, χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow hq₁]
#align legendre_sym.quadratic_reciprocity legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity
/-- The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity: if `p` and `q` are odd primes, then
`(q / p) = (-1)^((p-1)(q-1)/4) * (p / q)`. -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity' (hp : p ≠ 2) (hq : q ≠ 2) :
legendreSym q p = (-1) ^ (p / 2 * (q / 2)) * legendreSym p q := by
rcases eq_or_ne p q with h | h
· subst p
rw [(eq_zero_iff q q).mpr (mod_cast natCast_self q), mul_zero]
· have qr := congr_arg (· * legendreSym p q) (quadratic_reciprocity hp hq h)
have : ((q : ℤ) : ZMod p) ≠ 0 := mod_cast prime_ne_zero p q h
simpa only [mul_assoc, ← pow_two, sq_one p this, mul_one] using qr
#align legendre_sym.quadratic_reciprocity' legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity'
/-- The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity: if `p` and `q` are odd primes and `p % 4 = 1`,
then `(q / p) = (p / q)`. -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four (hp : p % 4 = 1) (hq : q ≠ 2) :
legendreSym q p = legendreSym p q := by
rw [quadratic_reciprocity' (Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two.mp (odd_of_mod_four_eq_one hp)) hq,
pow_mul, neg_one_pow_div_two_of_one_mod_four hp, one_pow, one_mul]
#align legendre_sym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four
/-- The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity: if `p` and `q` are primes that are both congruent
to `3` mod `4`, then `(q / p) = -(p / q)`. -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four (hp : p % 4 = 3) (hq : q % 4 = 3) :
legendreSym q p = -legendreSym p q := by
let nop := @neg_one_pow_div_two_of_three_mod_four
rw [quadratic_reciprocity', pow_mul, nop hp, nop hq, neg_one_mul] <;>
rwa [← Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two, odd_of_mod_four_eq_three]
#align legendre_sym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four
end legendreSym
namespace ZMod
open legendreSym
/-- If `p` and `q` are odd primes and `p % 4 = 1`, then `q` is a square mod `p` iff
`p` is a square mod `q`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/QuadraticReciprocity.lean | 173 | 178 | theorem exists_sq_eq_prime_iff_of_mod_four_eq_one (hp1 : p % 4 = 1) (hq1 : q ≠ 2) :
IsSquare (q : ZMod p) ↔ IsSquare (p : ZMod q) := by |
rcases eq_or_ne p q with h | h
· subst p; rfl
· rw [← eq_one_iff' p (prime_ne_zero p q h), ← eq_one_iff' q (prime_ne_zero q p h.symm),
quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four hp1 hq1]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.Differentiation
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
#align_import measure_theory.covering.besicovitch from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5f6e827d81dfbeb6151d7016586ceeb0099b9655"
/-!
# Besicovitch covering theorems
The topological Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, in a nice metric space, there exists a
number `N` such that, from any family of balls with bounded radii, one can extract `N` families,
each made of disjoint balls, covering together all the centers of the initial family.
By "nice metric space", we mean a technical property stated as follows: there exists no satellite
configuration of `N + 1` points (with a given parameter `τ > 1`). Such a configuration is a family
of `N + 1` balls, where the first `N` balls all intersect the last one, but none of them contains
the center of another one and their radii are controlled. This property is for instance
satisfied by finite-dimensional real vector spaces.
In this file, we prove the topological Besicovitch covering theorem,
in `Besicovitch.exist_disjoint_covering_families`.
The measurable Besicovitch theorem ensures that, in the same class of metric spaces, if at every
point one considers a class of balls of arbitrarily small radii, called admissible balls, then
one can cover almost all the space by a family of disjoint admissible balls.
It is deduced from the topological Besicovitch theorem, and proved
in `Besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
This implies that balls of small radius form a Vitali family in such spaces. Therefore, theorems
on differentiation of measures hold as a consequence of general results. We restate them in this
context to make them more easily usable.
## Main definitions and results
* `SatelliteConfig α N τ` is the type of all satellite configurations of `N + 1` points
in the metric space `α`, with parameter `τ`.
* `HasBesicovitchCovering` is a class recording that there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there is no satellite configuration of `N + 1` points with parameter `τ`.
* `exist_disjoint_covering_families` is the topological Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls one can extract finitely many disjoint subfamilies covering the same set.
* `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering` is the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls with arbitrarily small radii at every point, one can extract countably many
disjoint balls covering almost all the space. While the value of `N` is relevant for the precise
statement of the topological Besicovitch theorem, it becomes irrelevant for the measurable one.
Therefore, this statement is expressed using the `Prop`-valued
typeclass `HasBesicovitchCovering`.
We also restate the following specialized versions of general theorems on differentiation of
measures:
* `Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv` ensures that `ρ (closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)` tends
almost surely to the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ` at `x`.
* `Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that almost every point in an arbitrary set `s`
is a Lebesgue density point, i.e., `μ (s ∩ closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)` tends to `1` as
`r` tends to `0`. A stronger version for measurable sets is given in
`Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurableSet`.
## Implementation
#### Sketch of proof of the topological Besicovitch theorem:
We choose balls in a greedy way. First choose a ball with maximal radius (or rather, since there
is no guarantee the maximal radius is realized, a ball with radius within a factor `τ` of the
supremum). Then, remove all balls whose center is covered by the first ball, and choose among the
remaining ones a ball with radius close to maximum. Go on forever until there is no available
center (this is a transfinite induction in general).
Then define inductively a coloring of the balls. A ball will be of color `i` if it intersects
already chosen balls of color `0`, ..., `i - 1`, but none of color `i`. In this way, balls of the
same color form a disjoint family, and the space is covered by the families of the different colors.
The nontrivial part is to show that at most `N` colors are used. If one needs `N + 1` colors,
consider the first time this happens. Then the corresponding ball intersects `N` balls of the
different colors. Moreover, the inductive construction ensures that the radii of all the balls are
controlled: they form a satellite configuration with `N + 1` balls (essentially by definition of
satellite configurations). Since we assume that there are no such configurations, this is a
contradiction.
#### Sketch of proof of the measurable Besicovitch theorem:
From the topological Besicovitch theorem, one can find a disjoint countable family of balls
covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the space. Taking a large enough finite subset of these
balls, one gets the same property for finitely many balls. Their union is closed. Therefore, any
point in the complement has around it an admissible ball not intersecting these finitely many balls.
Applying again the topological Besicovitch theorem, one extracts from these a disjoint countable
subfamily covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the remaining points, and then even a disjoint
finite subfamily. Then one goes on again and again, covering at each step a positive proportion of
the remaining points, while remaining disjoint from the already chosen balls. The union of all these
balls is the desired almost everywhere covering.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open Metric Set Filter Fin MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology Classical ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal
/-!
### Satellite configurations
-/
/-- A satellite configuration is a configuration of `N+1` points that shows up in the inductive
construction for the Besicovitch covering theorem. It depends on some parameter `τ ≥ 1`.
This is a family of balls (indexed by `i : Fin N.succ`, with center `c i` and radius `r i`) such
that the last ball intersects all the other balls (condition `inter`),
and given any two balls there is an order between them, ensuring that the first ball does not
contain the center of the other one, and the radius of the second ball can not be larger than
the radius of the first ball (up to a factor `τ`). This order corresponds to the order of choice
in the inductive construction: otherwise, the second ball would have been chosen before.
This is the condition `h`.
Finally, the last ball is chosen after all the other ones, meaning that `h` can be strengthened
by keeping only one side of the alternative in `hlast`.
-/
structure Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig (α : Type*) [MetricSpace α] (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ) where
c : Fin N.succ → α
r : Fin N.succ → ℝ
rpos : ∀ i, 0 < r i
h : Pairwise fun i j =>
r i ≤ dist (c i) (c j) ∧ r j ≤ τ * r i ∨ r j ≤ dist (c j) (c i) ∧ r i ≤ τ * r j
hlast : ∀ i < last N, r i ≤ dist (c i) (c (last N)) ∧ r (last N) ≤ τ * r i
inter : ∀ i < last N, dist (c i) (c (last N)) ≤ r i + r (last N)
#align besicovitch.satellite_config Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.c Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.c
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.r Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.rpos Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.rpos
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.h Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.h
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.hlast Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.hlast
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.inter Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.inter
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r`. -/
@[positivity Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r _ _]
def evalBesicovitchSatelliteConfigR : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r $β $inst $N $τ $self $i) =>
assertInstancesCommute
return .positive q(Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.rpos $self $i)
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-- A metric space has the Besicovitch covering property if there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there are no satellite configuration of parameter `τ` with `N+1` points. This is the condition that
guarantees that the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem holds. It is satisfied by
finite-dimensional real vector spaces. -/
class HasBesicovitchCovering (α : Type*) [MetricSpace α] : Prop where
no_satelliteConfig : ∃ (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ), 1 < τ ∧ IsEmpty (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α N τ)
#align has_besicovitch_covering HasBesicovitchCovering
#align has_besicovitch_covering.no_satellite_config HasBesicovitchCovering.no_satelliteConfig
/-- There is always a satellite configuration with a single point. -/
instance Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.instInhabited {α : Type*} {τ : ℝ}
[Inhabited α] [MetricSpace α] : Inhabited (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α 0 τ) :=
⟨{ c := default
r := fun _ => 1
rpos := fun _ => zero_lt_one
h := fun i j hij => (hij (Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i j)).elim
hlast := fun i hi => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i (last 0)] at hi; exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim
inter := fun i hi => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i (last 0)] at hi; exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim }⟩
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.inhabited Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.instInhabited
namespace Besicovitch
namespace SatelliteConfig
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig α N τ)
theorem inter' (i : Fin N.succ) : dist (a.c i) (a.c (last N)) ≤ a.r i + a.r (last N) := by
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with (H | H)
· exact a.inter i H
· have I : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H
have := (a.rpos (last N)).le
simp only [I, add_nonneg this this, dist_self]
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.inter' Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.inter'
theorem hlast' (i : Fin N.succ) (h : 1 ≤ τ) : a.r (last N) ≤ τ * a.r i := by
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with (H | H)
· exact (a.hlast i H).2
· have : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H
rw [this]
exact le_mul_of_one_le_left (a.rpos _).le h
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.hlast' Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.hlast'
end SatelliteConfig
/-! ### Extracting disjoint subfamilies from a ball covering -/
/-- A ball package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii. -/
structure BallPackage (β : Type*) (α : Type*) where
c : β → α
r : β → ℝ
rpos : ∀ b, 0 < r b
r_bound : ℝ
r_le : ∀ b, r b ≤ r_bound
#align besicovitch.ball_package Besicovitch.BallPackage
#align besicovitch.ball_package.c Besicovitch.BallPackage.c
#align besicovitch.ball_package.r Besicovitch.BallPackage.r
#align besicovitch.ball_package.rpos Besicovitch.BallPackage.rpos
#align besicovitch.ball_package.r_bound Besicovitch.BallPackage.r_bound
#align besicovitch.ball_package.r_le Besicovitch.BallPackage.r_le
/-- The ball package made of unit balls. -/
def unitBallPackage (α : Type*) : BallPackage α α where
c := id
r _ := 1
rpos _ := zero_lt_one
r_bound := 1
r_le _ := le_rfl
#align besicovitch.unit_ball_package Besicovitch.unitBallPackage
instance BallPackage.instInhabited (α : Type*) : Inhabited (BallPackage α α) :=
⟨unitBallPackage α⟩
#align besicovitch.ball_package.inhabited Besicovitch.BallPackage.instInhabited
/-- A Besicovitch tau-package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii,
together with enough data to proceed with the Besicovitch greedy algorithm. We register this in
a single structure to make sure that all our constructions in this algorithm only depend on
one variable. -/
structure TauPackage (β : Type*) (α : Type*) extends BallPackage β α where
τ : ℝ
one_lt_tau : 1 < τ
#align besicovitch.tau_package Besicovitch.TauPackage
#align besicovitch.tau_package.τ Besicovitch.TauPackage.τ
#align besicovitch.tau_package.one_lt_tau Besicovitch.TauPackage.one_lt_tau
instance TauPackage.instInhabited (α : Type*) : Inhabited (TauPackage α α) :=
⟨{ unitBallPackage α with
τ := 2
one_lt_tau := one_lt_two }⟩
#align besicovitch.tau_package.inhabited Besicovitch.TauPackage.instInhabited
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {β : Type u}
namespace TauPackage
variable [Nonempty β] (p : TauPackage β α)
/-- Choose inductively large balls with centers that are not contained in the union of already
chosen balls. This is a transfinite induction. -/
noncomputable def index : Ordinal.{u} → β
| i =>
-- `Z` is the set of points that are covered by already constructed balls
let Z := ⋃ j : { j // j < i }, ball (p.c (index j)) (p.r (index j))
-- `R` is the supremum of the radii of balls with centers not in `Z`
let R := iSup fun b : { b : β // p.c b ∉ Z } => p.r b
-- return an index `b` for which the center `c b` is not in `Z`, and the radius is at
-- least `R / τ`, if such an index exists (and garbage otherwise).
Classical.epsilon fun b : β => p.c b ∉ Z ∧ R ≤ p.τ * p.r b
termination_by i => i
decreasing_by exact j.2
#align besicovitch.tau_package.index Besicovitch.TauPackage.index
/-- The set of points that are covered by the union of balls selected at steps `< i`. -/
def iUnionUpTo (i : Ordinal.{u}) : Set α :=
⋃ j : { j // j < i }, ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
#align besicovitch.tau_package.Union_up_to Besicovitch.TauPackage.iUnionUpTo
theorem monotone_iUnionUpTo : Monotone p.iUnionUpTo := by
intro i j hij
simp only [iUnionUpTo]
exact iUnion_mono' fun r => ⟨⟨r, r.2.trans_le hij⟩, Subset.rfl⟩
#align besicovitch.tau_package.monotone_Union_up_to Besicovitch.TauPackage.monotone_iUnionUpTo
/-- Supremum of the radii of balls whose centers are not yet covered at step `i`. -/
def R (i : Ordinal.{u}) : ℝ :=
iSup fun b : { b : β // p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i } => p.r b
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align besicovitch.tau_package.R Besicovitch.TauPackage.R
/-- Group the balls into disjoint families, by assigning to a ball the smallest color for which
it does not intersect any already chosen ball of this color. -/
noncomputable def color : Ordinal.{u} → ℕ
| i =>
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < i })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty), {color j}
sInf (univ \ A)
termination_by i => i
decreasing_by exact j.2
#align besicovitch.tau_package.color Besicovitch.TauPackage.color
/-- `p.lastStep` is the first ordinal where the construction stops making sense, i.e., `f` returns
garbage since there is no point left to be chosen. We will only use ordinals before this step. -/
def lastStep : Ordinal.{u} :=
sInf {i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}
#align besicovitch.tau_package.last_step Besicovitch.TauPackage.lastStep
theorem lastStep_nonempty :
{i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}.Nonempty := by
by_contra h
suffices H : Function.Injective p.index from not_injective_of_ordinal p.index H
intro x y hxy
wlog x_le_y : x ≤ y generalizing x y
· exact (this hxy.symm (le_of_not_le x_le_y)).symm
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le x_le_y with (rfl | H); · rfl
simp only [nonempty_def, not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_setOf_eq,
not_forall] at h
specialize h y
have A : p.c (p.index y) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo y := by
have :
p.index y =
Classical.epsilon fun b : β => p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo y ∧ p.R y ≤ p.τ * p.r b := by
rw [TauPackage.index]; rfl
rw [this]
exact (Classical.epsilon_spec h).1
simp only [iUnionUpTo, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_le,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at A
specialize A x H
simp? [hxy] at A says simp only [hxy, mem_ball, dist_self, not_lt] at A
exact (lt_irrefl _ ((p.rpos (p.index y)).trans_le A)).elim
#align besicovitch.tau_package.last_step_nonempty Besicovitch.TauPackage.lastStep_nonempty
/-- Every point is covered by chosen balls, before `p.lastStep`. -/
theorem mem_iUnionUpTo_lastStep (x : β) : p.c x ∈ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep := by
have A : ∀ z : β, p.c z ∈ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep ∨ p.τ * p.r z < p.R p.lastStep := by
have : p.lastStep ∈ {i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b} :=
csInf_mem p.lastStep_nonempty
simpa only [not_exists, mem_setOf_eq, not_and_or, not_le, not_not_mem]
by_contra h
rcases A x with (H | H); · exact h H
have Rpos : 0 < p.R p.lastStep := by
apply lt_trans (mul_pos (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau) (p.rpos _)) H
have B : p.τ⁻¹ * p.R p.lastStep < p.R p.lastStep := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul (p.R p.lastStep)]
exact mul_lt_mul (inv_lt_one p.one_lt_tau) le_rfl Rpos zero_le_one
obtain ⟨y, hy1, hy2⟩ : ∃ y, p.c y ∉ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep ∧ p.τ⁻¹ * p.R p.lastStep < p.r y := by
have := exists_lt_of_lt_csSup ?_ B
· simpa only [exists_prop, mem_range, exists_exists_and_eq_and, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [← image_univ, image_nonempty]
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, mem_univ _⟩
rcases A y with (Hy | Hy)
· exact hy1 Hy
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul] at hy2
have := (div_le_iff' (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau)).1 hy2.le
exact lt_irrefl _ (Hy.trans_le this)
#align besicovitch.tau_package.mem_Union_up_to_last_step Besicovitch.TauPackage.mem_iUnionUpTo_lastStep
/-- If there are no configurations of satellites with `N+1` points, one never uses more than `N`
distinct families in the Besicovitch inductive construction. -/
theorem color_lt {i : Ordinal.{u}} (hi : i < p.lastStep) {N : ℕ}
(hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N p.τ)) : p.color i < N := by
/- By contradiction, consider the first ordinal `i` for which one would have `p.color i = N`.
Choose for each `k < N` a ball with color `k` that intersects the ball at color `i`
(there is such a ball, otherwise one would have used the color `k` and not `N`).
Then this family of `N+1` balls forms a satellite configuration, which is forbidden by
the assumption `hN`. -/
induction' i using Ordinal.induction with i IH
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < i })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty),
{p.color j}
have color_i : p.color i = sInf (univ \ A) := by rw [color]
rw [color_i]
have N_mem : N ∈ univ \ A := by
simp only [A, not_exists, true_and_iff, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff,
mem_closedBall, not_and, mem_univ, mem_diff, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
intro j ji _
exact (IH j ji (ji.trans hi)).ne'
suffices sInf (univ \ A) ≠ N by
rcases (csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow (univ \ A)) N_mem).lt_or_eq with (H | H)
· exact H
· exact (this H).elim
intro Inf_eq_N
have :
∀ k, k < N → ∃ j, j < i ∧
(closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty ∧ k = p.color j := by
intro k hk
rw [← Inf_eq_N] at hk
have : k ∈ A := by
simpa only [true_and_iff, mem_univ, Classical.not_not, mem_diff] using
Nat.not_mem_of_lt_sInf hk
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right,
and_assoc] at this
simpa only [A, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, mem_closedBall, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
choose! g hg using this
-- Choose for each `k < N` an ordinal `G k < i` giving a ball of color `k` intersecting
-- the last ball.
let G : ℕ → Ordinal := fun n => if n = N then i else g n
have color_G : ∀ n, n ≤ N → p.color (G n) = n := by
intro n hn
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· simp only [G]; simp only [color_i, Inf_eq_N, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
· simp only [G]; simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).right.right.symm, if_false]
have G_lt_last : ∀ n, n ≤ N → G n < p.lastStep := by
intro n hn
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· simp only [G]; simp only [hi, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
· simp only [G]; simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).left.trans hi, if_false]
have fGn :
∀ n, n ≤ N →
p.c (p.index (G n)) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G n)) := by
intro n hn
have :
p.index (G n) =
Classical.epsilon fun t => p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t := by
rw [index]; rfl
rw [this]
have : ∃ t, p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t := by
simpa only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall] using
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (G_lt_last n hn) (OrderBot.bddBelow _)
exact Classical.epsilon_spec this
-- the balls with indices `G k` satisfy the characteristic property of satellite configurations.
have Gab :
∀ a b : Fin (Nat.succ N),
G a < G b →
p.r (p.index (G a)) ≤ dist (p.c (p.index (G a))) (p.c (p.index (G b))) ∧
p.r (p.index (G b)) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G a)) := by
intro a b G_lt
have ha : (a : ℕ) ≤ N := Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2
have hb : (b : ℕ) ≤ N := Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2
constructor
· have := (fGn b hb).1
simp only [iUnionUpTo, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_le,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at this
simpa only [dist_comm, mem_ball, not_lt] using this (G a) G_lt
· apply le_trans _ (fGn a ha).2
have B : p.c (p.index (G b)) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) := by
intro H; exact (fGn b hb).1 (p.monotone_iUnionUpTo G_lt.le H)
let b' : { t // p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) } := ⟨p.index (G b), B⟩
apply @le_ciSup _ _ _ (fun t : { t // p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) } => p.r t) _ b'
refine ⟨p.r_bound, fun t ht => ?_⟩
simp only [exists_prop, mem_range, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at ht
rcases ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [← hu.2]
exact p.r_le _
-- therefore, one may use them to construct a satellite configuration with `N+1` points
let sc : SatelliteConfig α N p.τ :=
{ c := fun k => p.c (p.index (G k))
r := fun k => p.r (p.index (G k))
rpos := fun k => p.rpos (p.index (G k))
h := by
intro a b a_ne_b
wlog G_le : G a ≤ G b generalizing a b
· exact (this a_ne_b.symm (le_of_not_le G_le)).symm
have G_lt : G a < G b := by
rcases G_le.lt_or_eq with (H | H); · exact H
have A : (a : ℕ) ≠ b := Fin.val_injective.ne a_ne_b
rw [← color_G a (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2), ← color_G b (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2), H] at A
exact (A rfl).elim
exact Or.inl (Gab a b G_lt)
hlast := by
intro a ha
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha
have : G a < G (Fin.last N) := by dsimp; simp [G, I.ne, (hg a I).1]
exact Gab _ _ this
inter := by
intro a ha
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha
have J : G (Fin.last N) = i := by dsimp; simp only [G, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
have K : G a = g a := by dsimp [G]; simp [I.ne, (hg a I).1]
convert dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall (hg _ I).2.1 }
-- this is a contradiction
exact hN.false sc
#align besicovitch.tau_package.color_lt Besicovitch.TauPackage.color_lt
end TauPackage
open TauPackage
/-- The topological Besicovitch covering theorem: there exist finitely many families of disjoint
balls covering all the centers in a package. More specifically, one can use `N` families if there
are no satellite configurations with `N+1` points. -/
theorem exist_disjoint_covering_families {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (hτ : 1 < τ)
(hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N τ)) (q : BallPackage β α) :
∃ s : Fin N → Set β,
(∀ i : Fin N, (s i).PairwiseDisjoint fun j => closedBall (q.c j) (q.r j)) ∧
range q.c ⊆ ⋃ i : Fin N, ⋃ j ∈ s i, ball (q.c j) (q.r j) := by
-- first exclude the trivial case where `β` is empty (we need non-emptiness for the transfinite
-- induction, to be able to choose garbage when there is no point left).
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· refine ⟨fun _ => ∅, fun _ => pairwiseDisjoint_empty, ?_⟩
rw [← image_univ, eq_empty_of_isEmpty (univ : Set β)]
simp
-- Now, assume `β` is nonempty.
let p : TauPackage β α :=
{ q with
τ
one_lt_tau := hτ }
-- we use for `s i` the balls of color `i`.
let s := fun i : Fin N =>
⋃ (k : Ordinal.{u}) (_ : k < p.lastStep) (_ : p.color k = i), ({p.index k} : Set β)
refine ⟨s, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· -- show that balls of the same color are disjoint
intro x hx y hy x_ne_y
obtain ⟨jx, jx_lt, jxi, rfl⟩ :
∃ jx : Ordinal, jx < p.lastStep ∧ p.color jx = i ∧ x = p.index jx := by
simpa only [s, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff] using hx
obtain ⟨jy, jy_lt, jyi, rfl⟩ :
∃ jy : Ordinal, jy < p.lastStep ∧ p.color jy = i ∧ y = p.index jy := by
simpa only [s, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff] using hy
wlog jxy : jx ≤ jy generalizing jx jy
· exact (this jy jy_lt jyi hy jx jx_lt jxi hx x_ne_y.symm (le_of_not_le jxy)).symm
replace jxy : jx < jy := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le jxy with (H | rfl); · { exact H }; · { exact (x_ne_y rfl).elim }
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < jy })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index jy)) (p.r (p.index jy))).Nonempty),
{p.color j}
have color_j : p.color jy = sInf (univ \ A) := by rw [TauPackage.color]
have h : p.color jy ∈ univ \ A := by
rw [color_j]
apply csInf_mem
refine ⟨N, ?_⟩
simp only [A, not_exists, true_and_iff, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, not_and,
mem_univ, mem_diff, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
intro k hk _
exact (p.color_lt (hk.trans jy_lt) hN).ne'
simp only [A, not_exists, true_and_iff, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, not_and,
mem_univ, mem_diff, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at h
specialize h jx jxy
contrapose! h
simpa only [jxi, jyi, and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] using h
· -- show that the balls of color at most `N` cover every center.
refine range_subset_iff.2 fun b => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ :
∃ a : Ordinal, a < p.lastStep ∧ dist (p.c b) (p.c (p.index a)) < p.r (p.index a) := by
simpa only [iUnionUpTo, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_ball, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk] using p.mem_iUnionUpTo_lastStep b
simp only [s, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_ball, mem_singleton_iff, biUnion_and',
exists_eq_left, iUnion_exists, exists_and_left]
exact ⟨⟨p.color a, p.color_lt ha.1 hN⟩, a, rfl, ha⟩
#align besicovitch.exist_disjoint_covering_families Besicovitch.exist_disjoint_covering_families
/-!
### The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem
-/
open scoped NNReal
variable [SecondCountableTopology α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
/-- Consider, for each `x` in a set `s`, a radius `r x ∈ (0, 1]`. Then one can find finitely
many disjoint balls of the form `closedBall x (r x)` covering a proportion `1/(N+1)` of `s`, if
there are no satellite configurations with `N+1` points.
-/
theorem exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {N : ℕ}
{τ : ℝ} (hτ : 1 < τ) (hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N τ)) (s : Set α) (r : α → ℝ)
(rpos : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < r x) (rle : ∀ x ∈ s, r x ≤ 1) :
∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) ≤ N / (N + 1) * μ s ∧
(t : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
-- exclude the trivial case where `μ s = 0`.
rcases le_or_lt (μ s) 0 with (hμs | hμs)
· have : μ s = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 hμs
refine ⟨∅, by simp only [Finset.coe_empty, empty_subset], ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [this, Finset.not_mem_empty, diff_empty, iUnion_false, iUnion_empty,
nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· simp only [Finset.coe_empty, pairwiseDisjoint_empty]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· simp only [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty] at hμs
exact (lt_irrefl _ hμs).elim
have Npos : N ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
inhabit α
exact not_isEmpty_of_nonempty _ hN
-- introduce a measurable superset `o` with the same measure, for measure computations
obtain ⟨o, so, omeas, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, s ⊆ o ∧ MeasurableSet o ∧ μ o = μ s :=
exists_measurable_superset μ s
/- We will apply the topological Besicovitch theorem, giving `N` disjoint subfamilies of balls
covering `s`. Among these, one of them covers a proportion at least `1/N` of `s`. A large
enough finite subfamily will then cover a proportion at least `1/(N+1)`. -/
let a : BallPackage s α :=
{ c := fun x => x
r := fun x => r x
rpos := fun x => rpos x x.2
r_bound := 1
r_le := fun x => rle x x.2 }
rcases exist_disjoint_covering_families hτ hN a with ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩
have u_count : ∀ i, (u i).Countable := by
intro i
refine (hu i).countable_of_nonempty_interior fun j _ => ?_
have : (ball (j : α) (r j)).Nonempty := nonempty_ball.2 (a.rpos _)
exact this.mono ball_subset_interior_closedBall
let v : Fin N → Set α := fun i => ⋃ (x : s) (_ : x ∈ u i), closedBall x (r x)
have A : s = ⋃ i : Fin N, s ∩ v i := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (iUnion_subset fun i => inter_subset_left)
intro x hx
obtain ⟨i, y, hxy, h'⟩ :
∃ (i : Fin N) (i_1 : ↥s), i_1 ∈ u i ∧ x ∈ ball (↑i_1) (r ↑i_1) := by
have : x ∈ range a.c := by simpa only [Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
simpa only [mem_iUnion, bex_def] using hu' this
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ⟨hx, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [v, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, SetCoe.exists, exists_and_right, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact ⟨y, ⟨y.2, by simpa only [Subtype.coe_eta]⟩, ball_subset_closedBall h'⟩
have S : ∑ _i : Fin N, μ s / N ≤ ∑ i, μ (s ∩ v i) :=
calc
∑ _i : Fin N, μ s / N = μ s := by
simp only [Finset.card_fin, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
rw [ENNReal.mul_div_cancel']
· simp only [Npos, Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, not_false_iff]
· exact ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _
_ ≤ ∑ i, μ (s ∩ v i) := by
conv_lhs => rw [A]
apply measure_iUnion_fintype_le
-- choose an index `i` of a subfamily covering at least a proportion `1/N` of `s`.
obtain ⟨i, -, hi⟩ : ∃ (i : Fin N), i ∈ Finset.univ ∧ μ s / N ≤ μ (s ∩ v i) := by
apply ENNReal.exists_le_of_sum_le _ S
exact ⟨⟨0, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 Npos⟩, Finset.mem_univ _⟩
replace hi : μ s / (N + 1) < μ (s ∩ v i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ hi
apply (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left hμs.ne' (measure_lt_top μ s).ne).2
rw [ENNReal.inv_lt_inv]
conv_lhs => rw [← add_zero (N : ℝ≥0∞)]
exact ENNReal.add_lt_add_left (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top N) zero_lt_one
have B : μ (o ∩ v i) = ∑' x : u i, μ (o ∩ closedBall x (r x)) := by
have : o ∩ v i = ⋃ (x : s) (_ : x ∈ u i), o ∩ closedBall x (r x) := by
simp only [v, inter_iUnion]
rw [this, measure_biUnion (u_count i)]
· exact (hu i).mono fun k => inter_subset_right
· exact fun b _ => omeas.inter measurableSet_closedBall
-- A large enough finite subfamily of `u i` will also cover a proportion `> 1/(N+1)` of `s`.
-- Since `s` might not be measurable, we express this in terms of the measurable superset `o`.
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ :
∃ w : Finset (u i), μ s / (N + 1) <
∑ x ∈ w, μ (o ∩ closedBall (x : α) (r (x : α))) := by
have C : HasSum (fun x : u i => μ (o ∩ closedBall x (r x))) (μ (o ∩ v i)) := by
rw [B]; exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
have : μ s / (N + 1) < μ (o ∩ v i) := hi.trans_le (measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ so))
exact ((tendsto_order.1 C).1 _ this).exists
-- Bring back the finset `w i` of `↑(u i)` to a finset of `α`, and check that it works by design.
refine ⟨Finset.image (fun x : u i => x) w, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
-- show that the finset is included in `s`.
· simp only [image_subset_iff, Finset.coe_image]
intro y _
simp only [Subtype.coe_prop, mem_preimage]
-- show that it covers a large enough proportion of `s`. For measure computations, we do not
-- use `s` (which might not be measurable), but its measurable superset `o`. Since their measures
-- are the same, this does not spoil the estimates
· suffices H : μ (o \ ⋃ x ∈ w, closedBall (↑x) (r ↑x)) ≤ N / (N + 1) * μ s by
rw [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]
exact le_trans (measure_mono (diff_subset_diff so (Subset.refl _))) H
rw [← diff_inter_self_eq_diff,
measure_diff_le_iff_le_add _ inter_subset_right (measure_lt_top μ _).ne]
swap
· apply MeasurableSet.inter _ omeas
haveI : Encodable (u i) := (u_count i).toEncodable
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => measurableSet_closedBall
calc
μ o = 1 / (N + 1) * μ s + N / (N + 1) * μ s := by
rw [μo, ← add_mul, ENNReal.div_add_div_same, add_comm, ENNReal.div_self, one_mul] <;> simp
_ ≤ μ ((⋃ x ∈ w, closedBall (↑x) (r ↑x)) ∩ o) + N / (N + 1) * μ s := by
gcongr
rw [one_div, mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
apply hw.le.trans (le_of_eq _)
rw [← Finset.set_biUnion_coe, inter_comm _ o, inter_iUnion₂, Finset.set_biUnion_coe,
measure_biUnion_finset]
· have : (w : Set (u i)).PairwiseDisjoint
fun b : u i => closedBall (b : α) (r (b : α)) := by
intro k _ l _ hkl; exact hu i k.2 l.2 (Subtype.val_injective.ne hkl)
exact this.mono fun k => inter_subset_right
· intro b _
apply omeas.inter measurableSet_closedBall
-- show that the balls are disjoint
· intro k hk l hl hkl
obtain ⟨k', _, rfl⟩ : ∃ k' : u i, k' ∈ w ∧ ↑k' = k := by
simpa only [mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_image] using hk
obtain ⟨l', _, rfl⟩ : ∃ l' : u i, l' ∈ w ∧ ↑l' = l := by
simpa only [mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_image] using hl
have k'nel' : (k' : s) ≠ l' := by intro h; rw [h] at hkl; exact hkl rfl
exact hu i k'.2 l'.2 k'nel'
#align besicovitch.exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure Besicovitch.exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure
variable [HasBesicovitchCovering α]
/-- The **measurable Besicovitch covering theorem**. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`.
This version requires that the underlying measure is finite, and that the space has the Besicovitch
covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces). It expresses the
conclusion in a slightly awkward form (with a subset of `α × ℝ`) coming from the proof technique.
For a version assuming that the measure is sigma-finite,
see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux`.
For a version giving the conclusion in a nicer form, see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_of_finiteMeasure_aux (μ : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → Set ℝ) (s : Set α)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Set (α × ℝ), t.Countable ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.2 ∈ f p.1) ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2 := by
rcases HasBesicovitchCovering.no_satelliteConfig (α := α) with ⟨N, τ, hτ, hN⟩
/- Introduce a property `P` on finsets saying that we have a nice disjoint covering of a
subset of `s` by admissible balls. -/
let P : Finset (α × ℝ) → Prop := fun t =>
((t : Set (α × ℝ)).PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2) ∧
(∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧ ∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ f p.1
/- Given a finite good covering of a subset `s`, one can find a larger finite good covering,
covering additionally a proportion at least `1/(N+1)` of leftover points. This follows from
`exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure` applied to balls not intersecting the initial
covering. -/
have :
∀ t : Finset (α × ℝ), P t → ∃ u : Finset (α × ℝ), t ⊆ u ∧ P u ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u), closedBall p.1 p.2) ≤
N / (N + 1) * μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) := by
intro t ht
set B := ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2 with hB
have B_closed : IsClosed B := isClosed_biUnion_finset fun i _ => isClosed_ball
set s' := s \ B
have : ∀ x ∈ s', ∃ r ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 1, Disjoint B (closedBall x r) := by
intro x hx
have xs : x ∈ s := ((mem_diff x).1 hx).1
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty B with (hB | hB)
· rcases hf x xs 1 zero_lt_one with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩
exact ⟨r, ⟨hr, h'r⟩, by simp only [hB, empty_disjoint]⟩
· let r := infDist x B
have : 0 < min r 1 :=
lt_min ((B_closed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos hB).1 ((mem_diff x).1 hx).2) zero_lt_one
rcases hf x xs _ this with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩
refine ⟨r, ⟨hr, ⟨h'r.1, h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rw [disjoint_comm]
exact disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist (h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))
choose! r hr using this
obtain ⟨v, vs', hμv, hv⟩ :
∃ v : Finset α,
↑v ⊆ s' ∧
μ (s' \ ⋃ x ∈ v, closedBall x (r x)) ≤ N / (N + 1) * μ s' ∧
(v : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint fun x : α => closedBall x (r x) :=
haveI rI : ∀ x ∈ s', r x ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 := fun x hx => (hr x hx).1.2
exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure μ hτ hN s' r (fun x hx => (rI x hx).1) fun x hx =>
(rI x hx).2.le
refine ⟨t ∪ Finset.image (fun x => (x, r x)) v, Finset.subset_union_left, ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp only [Finset.coe_union, pairwiseDisjoint_union, ht.1, true_and_iff, Finset.coe_image]
constructor
· intro p hp q hq hpq
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hp with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hq with ⟨q', q'v, rfl⟩
refine hv p'v q'v fun hp'q' => ?_
rw [hp'q'] at hpq
exact hpq rfl
· intro p hp q hq hpq
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hq with ⟨q', q'v, rfl⟩
apply disjoint_of_subset_left _ (hr q' (vs' q'v)).2
rw [hB, ← Finset.set_biUnion_coe]
exact subset_biUnion_of_mem (u := fun x : α × ℝ => closedBall x.1 x.2) hp
· intro p hp
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 hp with (h'p | h'p)
· exact ht.2.1 p h'p
· rcases Finset.mem_image.1 h'p with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩
exact ((mem_diff _).1 (vs' (Finset.mem_coe.2 p'v))).1
· intro p hp
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 hp with (h'p | h'p)
· exact ht.2.2 p h'p
· rcases Finset.mem_image.1 h'p with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩
exact (hr p' (vs' p'v)).1.1
· convert hμv using 2
rw [Finset.set_biUnion_union, ← diff_diff, Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]
/- Define `F` associating to a finite good covering the above enlarged good covering, covering
a proportion `1/(N+1)` of leftover points. Iterating `F`, one will get larger and larger good
coverings, missing in the end only a measure-zero set. -/
choose! F hF using this
let u n := F^[n] ∅
have u_succ : ∀ n : ℕ, u n.succ = F (u n) := fun n => by
simp only [u, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ']
have Pu : ∀ n, P (u n) := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [P, u, Prod.forall, id, Function.iterate_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, IsEmpty.forall_iff, Finset.coe_empty, forall₂_true_iff,
and_self_iff, pairwiseDisjoint_empty]
· rw [u_succ]
exact (hF (u n) IH).2.1
refine ⟨⋃ n, u n, countable_iUnion fun n => (u n).countable_toSet, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro p hp
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hp with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact (Pu n).2.1 p (Finset.mem_coe.1 hn)
· intro p hp
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hp with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact (Pu n).2.2 p (Finset.mem_coe.1 hn)
· have A :
∀ n,
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ ⋃ n : ℕ, (u n : Set (α × ℝ))), closedBall p.fst p.snd) ≤
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n), closedBall p.fst p.snd) := by
intro n
gcongr μ (s \ ?_)
exact biUnion_subset_biUnion_left (subset_iUnion (fun i => (u i : Set (α × ℝ))) n)
have B :
∀ n, μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n), closedBall p.fst p.snd) ≤
(N / (N + 1) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n * μ s := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [u, le_refl, diff_empty, one_mul, iUnion_false, iUnion_empty, pow_zero,
Nat.zero_eq, Function.iterate_zero, id, Finset.not_mem_empty]
calc
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n.succ), closedBall p.fst p.snd) ≤
N / (N + 1) * μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n), closedBall p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [u_succ]; exact (hF (u n) (Pu n)).2.2
_ ≤ (N / (N + 1) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n.succ * μ s := by
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc]; exact mul_le_mul_left' IH _
have C : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((N : ℝ≥0∞) / (N + 1)) ^ n * μ s) atTop (𝓝 (0 * μ s)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const _ (Or.inr (measure_lt_top μ s).ne)
apply ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one
rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff, one_mul]
· conv_lhs => rw [← add_zero (N : ℝ≥0∞)]
exact ENNReal.add_lt_add_left (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top N) zero_lt_one
· simp only [true_or_iff, add_eq_zero_iff, Ne, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero, and_false_iff]
· simp only [ENNReal.natCast_ne_top, Ne, not_false_iff, or_true_iff]
rw [zero_mul] at C
apply le_bot_iff.1
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' tendsto_const_nhds C fun n => (A n).trans (B n)
· refine (pairwiseDisjoint_iUnion ?_).2 fun n => (Pu n).1
apply (monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => ?_).directed_le
rw [← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, u_succ]
exact (hF (u n) (Pu n)).1
#align besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae_of_finite_measure_aux Besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_of_finiteMeasure_aux
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`.
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
It expresses the conclusion in a slightly awkward form (with a subset of `α × ℝ`) coming from the
proof technique.
For a version giving the conclusion in a nicer form, see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
(s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Set (α × ℝ), t.Countable ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.2 ∈ f p.1) ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2 := by
/- This is deduced from the finite measure case, by using a finite measure with respect to which
the initial sigma-finite measure is absolutely continuous. -/
rcases exists_absolutelyContinuous_isFiniteMeasure μ with ⟨ν, hν, hμν⟩
rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_of_finiteMeasure_aux ν f s hf with
⟨t, t_count, ts, tr, tν, tdisj⟩
exact ⟨t, t_count, ts, tr, hμν tν, tdisj⟩
#align besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae_aux Besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
(s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
(hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := fun x hx δ δpos ↦ by
rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
obtain ⟨r, t, rfl⟩ : ∃ (r : α → ℝ) (t : Set α), v = graphOn r t := by
have I : ∀ p ∈ v, 0 ≤ p.2 := fun p hp => (vg p hp).2.1.le
rw [exists_eq_graphOn]
refine fun x hx y hy heq ↦ v_disj.eq hx hy <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨x.1, ?_⟩
simp [*]
have hinj : InjOn (fun x ↦ (x, r x)) t := LeftInvOn.injOn (f₁' := Prod.fst) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
simp only [graphOn, forall_mem_image, biUnion_image, hinj.pairwiseDisjoint_image] at *
exact ⟨t, r, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image hinj v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
#align besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae Besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch property, any set `s` can be covered with balls whose measures
add up to at most `μ s + ε`, for any positive `ε`. This works even if one restricts the set of
allowed radii around a point `x` to a set `f x` which accumulates at `0`. -/
theorem exists_closedBall_covering_tsum_measure_le (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ]
[Measure.OuterRegular μ] {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) (f : α → Set ℝ) (s : Set α)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) :
∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) ∧ (∑' x : t, μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤ μ s + ε := by
/- For the proof, first cover almost all `s` with disjoint balls thanks to the usual Besicovitch
theorem. Taking the balls included in a well-chosen open neighborhood `u` of `s`, one may
ensure that their measures add at most to `μ s + ε / 2`. Let `s'` be the remaining set, of
measure `0`. Applying the other version of Besicovitch, one may cover it with at most `N`
disjoint subfamilies. Making sure that they are all included in a neighborhood `v` of `s'` of
measure at most `ε / (2 N)`, the sum of their measures is at most `ε / 2`,
completing the proof. -/
obtain ⟨u, su, u_open, μu⟩ : ∃ U, U ⊇ s ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U ≤ μ s + ε / 2 :=
Set.exists_isOpen_le_add _ _
(by
simpa only [or_false, Ne, ENNReal.div_eq_zero_iff, ENNReal.two_ne_top] using hε)
have : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ R > 0, ball x R ⊆ u := fun x hx =>
Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (u_open.mem_nhds (su hx))
choose! R hR using this
obtain ⟨t0, r0, t0_count, t0s, hr0, μt0, t0_disj⟩ :
∃ (t0 : Set α) (r0 : α → ℝ), t0.Countable ∧ t0 ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x ∈ t0, r0 x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t0, closedBall x (r0 x)) = 0 ∧
t0.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r0 x) :=
exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae μ f s hf R fun x hx => (hR x hx).1
-- we have constructed an almost everywhere covering of `s` by disjoint balls. Let `s'` be the
-- remaining set.
let s' := s \ ⋃ x ∈ t0, closedBall x (r0 x)
have s's : s' ⊆ s := diff_subset
obtain ⟨N, τ, hτ, H⟩ : ∃ N τ, 1 < τ ∧ IsEmpty (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α N τ) :=
HasBesicovitchCovering.no_satelliteConfig
obtain ⟨v, s'v, v_open, μv⟩ : ∃ v, v ⊇ s' ∧ IsOpen v ∧ μ v ≤ μ s' + ε / 2 / N :=
Set.exists_isOpen_le_add _ _
(by simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_zero_iff, hε, ENNReal.two_ne_top, or_self,
ENNReal.natCast_ne_top, not_false_eq_true])
have : ∀ x ∈ s', ∃ r1 ∈ f x ∩ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, closedBall x r1 ⊆ v := by
intro x hx
rcases Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (v_open.mem_nhds (s'v hx)) with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩
rcases hf x (s's hx) (min r 1) (lt_min rpos zero_lt_one) with ⟨R', hR'⟩
exact
⟨R', ⟨hR'.1, hR'.2.1, hR'.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
Subset.trans (closedBall_subset_ball (hR'.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))) hr⟩
choose! r1 hr1 using this
let q : BallPackage s' α :=
{ c := fun x => x
r := fun x => r1 x
rpos := fun x => (hr1 x.1 x.2).1.2.1
r_bound := 1
r_le := fun x => (hr1 x.1 x.2).1.2.2.le }
-- by Besicovitch, we cover `s'` with at most `N` families of disjoint balls, all included in
-- a suitable neighborhood `v` of `s'`.
obtain ⟨S, S_disj, hS⟩ :
∃ S : Fin N → Set s',
(∀ i : Fin N, (S i).PairwiseDisjoint fun j => closedBall (q.c j) (q.r j)) ∧
range q.c ⊆ ⋃ i : Fin N, ⋃ j ∈ S i, ball (q.c j) (q.r j) :=
exist_disjoint_covering_families hτ H q
have S_count : ∀ i, (S i).Countable := by
intro i
apply (S_disj i).countable_of_nonempty_interior fun j _ => ?_
have : (ball (j : α) (r1 j)).Nonempty := nonempty_ball.2 (q.rpos _)
exact this.mono ball_subset_interior_closedBall
let r x := if x ∈ s' then r1 x else r0 x
have r_t0 : ∀ x ∈ t0, r x = r0 x := by
intro x hx
have : ¬x ∈ s' := by
simp only [s', not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_lt, not_le,
mem_diff, not_forall]
intro _
refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [dist_self]
exact (hr0 x hx).2.1.le
simp only [r, if_neg this]
-- the desired covering set is given by the union of the families constructed in the first and
-- second steps.
refine ⟨t0 ∪ ⋃ i : Fin N, ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, r, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
-- it remains to check that they have the desired properties
· exact t0_count.union (countable_iUnion fun i => (S_count i).image _)
· simp only [t0s, true_and_iff, union_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i x _
exact s's x.2
· intro x hx
cases hx with
| inl hx =>
rw [r_t0 x hx]
exact (hr0 _ hx).1
| inr hx =>
have h'x : x ∈ s' := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨i, y, _, rfl⟩
exact y.2
simp only [r, if_pos h'x, (hr1 x h'x).1.1]
· intro x hx
by_cases h'x : x ∈ s'
· obtain ⟨i, y, ySi, xy⟩ : ∃ (i : Fin N) (y : ↥s'), y ∈ S i ∧ x ∈ ball (y : α) (r1 y) := by
have A : x ∈ range q.c := by
simpa only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_le,
mem_setOf_eq, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, mem_diff] using h'x
simpa only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, bex_def] using hS A
refine mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, Or.inr ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image]
exact ⟨i, y, ySi, rfl⟩
· have : (y : α) ∈ s' := y.2
simp only [r, if_pos this]
exact ball_subset_closedBall xy
· obtain ⟨y, yt0, hxy⟩ : ∃ y : α, y ∈ t0 ∧ x ∈ closedBall y (r0 y) := by
simpa [s', hx, -mem_closedBall] using h'x
refine mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, Or.inl yt0, ?_⟩
rwa [r_t0 _ yt0]
-- the only nontrivial property is the measure control, which we check now
· -- the sets in the first step have measure at most `μ s + ε / 2`
have A : (∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤ μ s + ε / 2 :=
calc
(∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) = ∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r0 x)) := by
congr 1; ext x; rw [r_t0 x x.2]
_ = μ (⋃ x : t0, closedBall x (r0 x)) := by
haveI : Encodable t0 := t0_count.toEncodable
rw [measure_iUnion]
· exact (pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set _ _).2 t0_disj
· exact fun i => measurableSet_closedBall
_ ≤ μ u := by
apply measure_mono
simp only [SetCoe.forall, Subtype.coe_mk, iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x hx
apply Subset.trans (closedBall_subset_ball (hr0 x hx).2.2) (hR x (t0s hx)).2
_ ≤ μ s + ε / 2 := μu
-- each subfamily in the second step has measure at most `ε / (2 N)`.
have B : ∀ i : Fin N, (∑' x : ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤ ε / 2 / N :=
fun i =>
calc
(∑' x : ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x))) =
∑' x : S i, μ (closedBall x (r x)) := by
have : InjOn ((↑) : s' → α) (S i) := Subtype.val_injective.injOn
let F : S i ≃ ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i := this.bijOn_image.equiv _
exact (F.tsum_eq fun x => μ (closedBall x (r x))).symm
_ = ∑' x : S i, μ (closedBall x (r1 x)) := by
congr 1; ext x; have : (x : α) ∈ s' := x.1.2; simp only [s', r, if_pos this]
_ = μ (⋃ x : S i, closedBall x (r1 x)) := by
haveI : Encodable (S i) := (S_count i).toEncodable
rw [measure_iUnion]
· exact (pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set _ _).2 (S_disj i)
· exact fun i => measurableSet_closedBall
_ ≤ μ v := by
apply measure_mono
simp only [SetCoe.forall, Subtype.coe_mk, iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x xs' _
exact (hr1 x xs').2
_ ≤ ε / 2 / N := by have : μ s' = 0 := μt0; rwa [this, zero_add] at μv
-- add up all these to prove the desired estimate
calc
(∑' x : ↥(t0 ∪ ⋃ i : Fin N, ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i), μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤
(∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) +
∑' x : ⋃ i : Fin N, ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x)) :=
ENNReal.tsum_union_le (fun x => μ (closedBall x (r x))) _ _
_ ≤
(∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) +
∑ i : Fin N, ∑' x : ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x)) :=
(add_le_add le_rfl (ENNReal.tsum_iUnion_le (fun x => μ (closedBall x (r x))) _))
_ ≤ μ s + ε / 2 + ∑ i : Fin N, ε / 2 / N := by
gcongr
apply B
_ ≤ μ s + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := by
gcongr
simp only [Finset.card_fin, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_div_le]
_ = μ s + ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
#align besicovitch.exists_closed_ball_covering_tsum_measure_le Besicovitch.exists_closedBall_covering_tsum_measure_le
/-! ### Consequences on differentiation of measures -/
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch covering property, the set of closed balls with positive radius
forms a Vitali family. This is essentially a restatement of the measurable Besicovitch theorem. -/
protected def vitaliFamily (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : VitaliFamily μ where
setsAt x := (fun r : ℝ => closedBall x r) '' Ioi (0 : ℝ)
measurableSet _ := forall_mem_image.2 fun _ _ ↦ isClosed_ball.measurableSet
nonempty_interior _ := forall_mem_image.2 fun r rpos ↦
(nonempty_ball.2 rpos).mono ball_subset_interior_closedBall
nontrivial x ε εpos := ⟨closedBall x ε, mem_image_of_mem _ εpos, Subset.rfl⟩
covering := by
intro s f fsubset ffine
let g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => {r | 0 < r ∧ closedBall x r ∈ f x}
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
intro x xs δ δpos
obtain ⟨t, tf, ht⟩ : ∃ (t : Set α), t ∈ f x ∧ t ⊆ closedBall x (δ / 2) :=
ffine x xs (δ / 2) (half_pos δpos)
obtain ⟨r, rpos, rfl⟩ : ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ closedBall x r = t := by simpa using fsubset x xs tf
rcases le_total r (δ / 2) with (H | H)
· exact ⟨r, ⟨rpos, tf⟩, ⟨rpos, H.trans_lt (half_lt_self δpos)⟩⟩
· have : closedBall x r = closedBall x (δ / 2) :=
Subset.antisymm ht (closedBall_subset_closedBall H)
rw [this] at tf
exact ⟨δ / 2, ⟨half_pos δpos, tf⟩, ⟨half_pos δpos, half_lt_self δpos⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, r, _, ts, tg, μt, tdisj⟩ :
∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ),
t.Countable ∧
t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ g x ∩ Ioo 0 1) ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) :=
exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae μ g s A (fun _ => 1) fun _ _ => zero_lt_one
let F : α → α × Set α := fun x => (x, closedBall x (r x))
refine ⟨F '' t, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact ts hx
· rintro p ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ q ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ hxy
exact tdisj hx hy (ne_of_apply_ne F hxy)
· rintro - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact (tg x hx).1.2
· rwa [biUnion_image]
#align besicovitch.vitali_family Besicovitch.vitaliFamily
/-- The main feature of the Besicovitch Vitali family is that its filter at a point `x` corresponds
to convergence along closed balls. We record one of the two implications here, which will enable us
to deduce specific statements on differentiation of measures in this context from the general
versions. -/
theorem tendsto_filterAt (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun r => closedBall x r) (𝓝[>] 0) ((Besicovitch.vitaliFamily μ).filterAt x) := by
intro s hs
simp only [mem_map]
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ :
∃ (ε : ℝ), ε > 0 ∧
∀ a : Set α, a ∈ (Besicovitch.vitaliFamily μ).setsAt x → a ⊆ closedBall x ε → a ∈ s :=
(VitaliFamily.mem_filterAt_iff _).1 hs
have : Ioc (0 : ℝ) ε ∈ 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ) := Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, εpos⟩
filter_upwards [this] with _ hr
apply hε
· exact mem_image_of_mem _ hr.1
· exact closedBall_subset_closedBall hr.2
#align besicovitch.tendsto_filter_at Besicovitch.tendsto_filterAt
variable [MetricSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β]
[HasBesicovitchCovering β]
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch covering property, the ratio of the measure of balls converges
almost surely to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Besicovitch.lean | 1,119 | 1,123 | theorem ae_tendsto_rnDeriv (ρ μ : Measure β) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ρ] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun r => ρ (closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (ρ.rnDeriv μ x)) := by |
filter_upwards [VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv (Besicovitch.vitaliFamily μ) ρ] with x hx
exact hx.comp (tendsto_filterAt μ x)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
#align_import topology.sober from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0a0ec35061ed9960bf0e7ffb0335f44447b58977"
/-!
# Sober spaces
A quasi-sober space is a topological space where every
irreducible closed subset has a generic point.
A sober space is a quasi-sober space where every irreducible closed subset
has a *unique* generic point. This is if and only if the space is T0, and thus sober spaces can be
stated via `[QuasiSober α] [T0Space α]`.
## Main definition
* `IsGenericPoint` : `x` is the generic point of `S` if `S` is the closure of `x`.
* `QuasiSober` : A space is quasi-sober if every irreducible closed subset has a generic point.
-/
open Set
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
section genericPoint
/-- `x` is a generic point of `S` if `S` is the closure of `x`. -/
def IsGenericPoint (x : α) (S : Set α) : Prop :=
closure ({x} : Set α) = S
#align is_generic_point IsGenericPoint
theorem isGenericPoint_def {x : α} {S : Set α} : IsGenericPoint x S ↔ closure ({x} : Set α) = S :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_generic_point_def isGenericPoint_def
theorem IsGenericPoint.def {x : α} {S : Set α} (h : IsGenericPoint x S) :
closure ({x} : Set α) = S :=
h
#align is_generic_point.def IsGenericPoint.def
theorem isGenericPoint_closure {x : α} : IsGenericPoint x (closure ({x} : Set α)) :=
refl _
#align is_generic_point_closure isGenericPoint_closure
variable {x y : α} {S U Z : Set α}
| Mathlib/Topology/Sober.lean | 53 | 54 | theorem isGenericPoint_iff_specializes : IsGenericPoint x S ↔ ∀ y, x ⤳ y ↔ y ∈ S := by |
simp only [specializes_iff_mem_closure, IsGenericPoint, Set.ext_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import analysis.normed_space.riesz_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Applications of the Hausdorff distance in normed spaces
Riesz's lemma, stated for a normed space over a normed field: for any
closed proper subspace `F` of `E`, there is a nonzero `x` such that `‖x - F‖`
is at least `r * ‖x‖` for any `r < 1`. This is `riesz_lemma`.
In a nontrivially normed field (with an element `c` of norm `> 1`) and any `R > ‖c‖`, one can
guarantee `‖x‖ ≤ R` and `‖x - y‖ ≥ 1` for any `y` in `F`. This is `riesz_lemma_of_norm_lt`.
A further lemma, `Metric.closedBall_infDist_compl_subset_closure`, finds a *closed* ball within
the closure of a set `s` of optimal distance from a point in `x` to the frontier of `s`.
-/
open Set Metric
open Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- Riesz's lemma, which usually states that it is possible to find a
vector with norm 1 whose distance to a closed proper subspace is
arbitrarily close to 1. The statement here is in terms of multiples of
norms, since in general the existence of an element of norm exactly 1
is not guaranteed. For a variant giving an element with norm in `[1, R]`, see
`riesz_lemma_of_norm_lt`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/RieszLemma.lean | 41 | 70 | theorem riesz_lemma {F : Subspace 𝕜 E} (hFc : IsClosed (F : Set E)) (hF : ∃ x : E, x ∉ F) {r : ℝ}
(hr : r < 1) : ∃ x₀ : E, x₀ ∉ F ∧ ∀ y ∈ F, r * ‖x₀‖ ≤ ‖x₀ - y‖ := by |
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x : E, x ∉ F := hF
let d := Metric.infDist x F
have hFn : (F : Set E).Nonempty := ⟨_, F.zero_mem⟩
have hdp : 0 < d :=
lt_of_le_of_ne Metric.infDist_nonneg fun heq =>
hx ((hFc.mem_iff_infDist_zero hFn).2 heq.symm)
let r' := max r 2⁻¹
have hr' : r' < 1 := by
simp only [r', ge_iff_le, max_lt_iff, hr, true_and]
norm_num
have hlt : 0 < r' := lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) (le_max_right r 2⁻¹)
have hdlt : d < d / r' := (lt_div_iff hlt).mpr ((mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right hdp).2 hr')
obtain ⟨y₀, hy₀F, hxy₀⟩ : ∃ y ∈ F, dist x y < d / r' := (Metric.infDist_lt_iff hFn).mp hdlt
have x_ne_y₀ : x - y₀ ∉ F := by
by_contra h
have : x - y₀ + y₀ ∈ F := F.add_mem h hy₀F
simp only [neg_add_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg] at this
exact hx this
refine ⟨x - y₀, x_ne_y₀, fun y hy => le_of_lt ?_⟩
have hy₀y : y₀ + y ∈ F := F.add_mem hy₀F hy
calc
r * ‖x - y₀‖ ≤ r' * ‖x - y₀‖ := by gcongr; apply le_max_left
_ < d := by
rw [← dist_eq_norm]
exact (lt_div_iff' hlt).1 hxy₀
_ ≤ dist x (y₀ + y) := Metric.infDist_le_dist_of_mem hy₀y
_ = ‖x - y₀ - y‖ := by rw [sub_sub, dist_eq_norm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.opposites from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"63417e01fbc711beaf25fa73b6edb395c0cfddd0"
/-! # Interactions between `R[X]` and `Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]`
This file contains the basic API for "pushing through" the isomorphism
`opRingEquiv : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]`. It allows going back and forth between a polynomial ring
over a semiring and the polynomial ring over the opposite semiring. -/
open Polynomial
open Polynomial MulOpposite
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ` and `Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]` sending each coefficient of a polynomial
to the corresponding element of the opposite ring. -/
def opRingEquiv (R : Type*) [Semiring R] : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ[X] :=
((toFinsuppIso R).op.trans AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv).trans (toFinsuppIso _).symm
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv Polynomial.opRingEquiv
/-! Lemmas to get started, using `opRingEquiv R` on the various expressions of
`Finsupp.single`: `monomial`, `C a`, `X`, `C a * X ^ n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) :
opRingEquiv R (op (monomial n r : R[X])) = monomial n (op r) := by
simp only [opRingEquiv, RingEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.op_apply_apply, toFinsuppIso_apply, unop_op,
toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.mapRange_single, toFinsuppIso_symm_apply, ofFinsupp_single]
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv_op_monomial Polynomial.opRingEquiv_op_monomial
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_C (a : R) : opRingEquiv R (op (C a)) = C (op a) :=
opRingEquiv_op_monomial 0 a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv_op_C Polynomial.opRingEquiv_op_C
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_X : opRingEquiv R (op (X : R[X])) = X :=
opRingEquiv_op_monomial 1 1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv_op_X Polynomial.opRingEquiv_op_X
theorem opRingEquiv_op_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
opRingEquiv R (op (C r * X ^ n : R[X])) = C (op r) * X ^ n := by
simp only [X_pow_mul, op_mul, op_pow, map_mul, map_pow, opRingEquiv_op_X, opRingEquiv_op_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv_op_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.opRingEquiv_op_C_mul_X_pow
/-! Lemmas to get started, using `(opRingEquiv R).symm` on the various expressions of
`Finsupp.single`: `monomial`, `C a`, `X`, `C a * X ^ n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : Rᵐᵒᵖ) :
(opRingEquiv R).symm (monomial n r) = op (monomial n (unop r)) :=
(opRingEquiv R).injective (by simp)
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv_symm_monomial Polynomial.opRingEquiv_symm_monomial
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_C (a : Rᵐᵒᵖ) : (opRingEquiv R).symm (C a) = op (C (unop a)) :=
opRingEquiv_symm_monomial 0 a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv_symm_C Polynomial.opRingEquiv_symm_C
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_X : (opRingEquiv R).symm (X : Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]) = op X :=
opRingEquiv_symm_monomial 1 1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.op_ring_equiv_symm_X Polynomial.opRingEquiv_symm_X
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Opposites.lean | 85 | 87 | theorem opRingEquiv_symm_C_mul_X_pow (r : Rᵐᵒᵖ) (n : ℕ) :
(opRingEquiv R).symm (C r * X ^ n : Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]) = op (C (unop r) * X ^ n) := by |
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, opRingEquiv_symm_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import algebra.big_operators.finprod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open scoped Classical
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
#align finsum finsum
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
#align finprod finprod
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x`-/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x`-/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
#align finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mul_support_to_finset_subset finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_to_finset_subset finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_toFinset_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
#align finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mul_support_subset finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
#align finprod_one finprod_one
#align finsum_zero finsum_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finprod_of_is_empty finprod_of_isEmpty
#align finsum_of_is_empty finsum_of_isEmpty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
#align finprod_false finprod_false
#align finsum_false finsum_false
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
#align finprod_eq_single finprod_eq_single
#align finsum_eq_single finsum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
#align finprod_unique finprod_unique
#align finsum_unique finsum_unique
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
#align finprod_true finprod_true
#align finsum_true finsum_true
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
#align finprod_eq_dif finprod_eq_dif
#align finsum_eq_dif finsum_eq_dif
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
#align finprod_eq_if finprod_eq_if
#align finsum_eq_if finsum_eq_if
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align finprod_congr finprod_congr
#align finsum_congr finsum_congr
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
#align finprod_congr_Prop finprod_congr_Prop
#align finsum_congr_Prop finsum_congr_Prop
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
#align finprod_induction finprod_induction
#align finsum_induction finsum_induction
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [OrderedCommSemiring R] {f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
#align finprod_nonneg finprod_nonneg
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [OrderedCommMonoid M] {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
#align one_le_finprod' one_le_finprod'
#align finsum_nonneg finsum_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_plift MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_plift AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_plift
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_Prop MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_Prop AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_Prop
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_of_preimage_zero AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_of_preimage_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
#align monoid_hom.map_finprod_of_injective MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective
#align add_monoid_hom.map_finsum_of_injective AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_of_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
#align mul_equiv.map_finprod MulEquiv.map_finprod
#align add_equiv.map_finsum AddEquiv.map_finsum
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
#align finsum_smul finsum_smul
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
#align smul_finsum smul_finsum
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
#align finprod_inv_distrib finprod_inv_distrib
#align finsum_neg_distrib finsum_neg_distrib
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
#align finprod_eq_mul_indicator_apply finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply
#align finsum_eq_indicator_apply finsum_eq_indicator_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
#align finprod_mem_mul_support finprod_mem_mulSupport
#align finsum_mem_support finsum_mem_support
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
#align finprod_mem_def finprod_mem_def
#align finsum_mem_def finsum_mem_def
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
#align finprod_eq_prod_of_mul_support_subset finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_of_support_subset finsum_eq_sum_of_support_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
#align finprod_eq_prod_of_mul_support_to_finset_subset finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset
#align finsum_eq_sum_of_support_to_finset_subset finsum_eq_sum_of_support_toFinset_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
#align finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mul_support_subset finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset
#align finsum_eq_finset_sum_of_support_subset finsum_eq_finset_sum_of_support_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
#align finprod_def finprod_def
#align finsum_def finsum_def
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
#align finprod_of_infinite_mul_support finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
#align finsum_of_infinite_support finsum_of_infinite_support
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
#align finprod_eq_prod finprod_eq_prod
#align finsum_eq_sum finsum_eq_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
#align finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype
#align finsum_eq_sum_of_fintype finsum_eq_sum_of_fintype
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
erw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
#align finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
#align finsum_cond_eq_sum_of_cond_iff finsum_cond_eq_sum_of_cond_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
#align finprod_cond_ne finprod_cond_ne
#align finsum_cond_ne finsum_cond_ne
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
#align finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mul_support_eq finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq
#align finsum_mem_eq_sum_of_inter_support_eq finsum_mem_eq_sum_of_inter_support_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
#align finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset
#align finsum_mem_eq_sum_of_subset finsum_mem_eq_sum_of_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
#align finprod_mem_eq_prod finprod_mem_eq_prod
#align finsum_mem_eq_sum finsum_mem_eq_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ Finset.filter (· ∈ s) hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
#align finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter
#align finsum_mem_eq_sum_filter finsum_mem_eq_sum_filter
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
#align finprod_mem_eq_to_finset_prod finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod
#align finsum_mem_eq_to_finset_sum finsum_mem_eq_toFinset_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
#align finprod_mem_eq_finite_to_finset_prod finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod
#align finsum_mem_eq_finite_to_finset_sum finsum_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
#align finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod
#align finsum_mem_finset_eq_sum finsum_mem_finset_eq_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
#align finprod_mem_coe_finset finprod_mem_coe_finset
#align finsum_mem_coe_finset finsum_mem_coe_finset
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
#align finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite
#align finsum_mem_eq_zero_of_infinite finsum_mem_eq_zero_of_infinite
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [h]
#align finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one
#align finsum_mem_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero finsum_mem_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
#align finprod_mem_inter_mul_support finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport
#align finsum_mem_inter_support finsum_mem_inter_support
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
#align finprod_mem_inter_mul_support_eq finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
#align finsum_mem_inter_support_eq finsum_mem_inter_support_eq
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 561 | 565 | theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by |
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Doubling
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
#align_import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.eq_haar from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Relationship between the Haar and Lebesgue measures
We prove that the Haar measure and Lebesgue measure are equal on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`, in
`MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume` and `MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi`.
We deduce basic properties of any Haar measure on a finite dimensional real vector space:
* `map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar`: a linear map rescales the Haar measure by the
absolute value of its determinant.
* `addHaar_preimage_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map with nonzero determinant, the measure
of `f ⁻¹' s` is the measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the inverse of the
determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_image_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map, the measure of `f '' s` is the
measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_submodule` : a strict submodule has measure `0`.
* `addHaar_smul` : the measure of `r • s` is `|r| ^ dim * μ s`.
* `addHaar_ball`: the measure of `ball x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_closedBall`: the measure of `closedBall x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_sphere`: spheres have zero measure.
This makes it possible to associate a Lebesgue measure to an `n`-alternating map in dimension `n`.
This measure is called `AlternatingMap.measure`. Its main property is
`ω.measure_parallelepiped v`, stating that the associated measure of the parallelepiped spanned
by vectors `v₁, ..., vₙ` is given by `|ω v|`.
We also show that a Lebesgue density point `x` of a set `s` (with respect to closed balls) has
density one for the rescaled copies `{x} + r • t` of a given set `t` with positive measure, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one`. In particular, `s` intersects `{x} + r • t` for
small `r`, see `eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one`.
Statements on integrals of functions with respect to an additive Haar measure can be found in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace`.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal
/-- The interval `[0,1]` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01 : PositiveCompacts ℝ where
carrier := Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by simp_rw [interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo, zero_lt_one]
#align topological_space.positive_compacts.Icc01 TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01
universe u
/-- The set `[0,1]^ι` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
PositiveCompacts (ι → ℝ) where
carrier := pi univ fun _ => Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_univ_pi fun _ => isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by
simp only [interior_pi_set, Set.toFinite, interior_Icc, univ_pi_nonempty_iff, nonempty_Ioo,
imp_true_iff, zero_lt_one]
#align topological_space.positive_compacts.pi_Icc01 TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01
/-- The parallelepiped formed from the standard basis for `ι → ℝ` is `[0,1]^ι` -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
(Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).parallelepiped = TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
refine Eq.trans ?_ ((uIcc_of_le ?_).trans (Set.pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm)
· classical convert parallelepiped_single (ι := ι) 1
· exact zero_le_one
#align basis.parallelepiped_basis_fun Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun
/-- A parallelepiped can be expressed on the standard basis. -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_eq_map {ι E : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
b.parallelepiped = (PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι).map b.equivFun.symm
b.equivFunL.symm.continuous b.equivFunL.symm.isOpenMap := by
classical
rw [← Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun, ← Basis.parallelepiped_map]
congr with x
simp
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Basis.map_addHaar {ι E F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace E]
[BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopology F] [SigmaCompactSpace F]
(b : Basis ι ℝ E) (f : E ≃L[ℝ] F) :
map f b.addHaar = (b.map f.toLinearEquiv).addHaar := by
have : IsAddHaarMeasure (map f b.addHaar) :=
AddEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map b.addHaar f.toAddEquiv f.continuous f.symm.continuous
rw [eq_comm, Basis.addHaar_eq_iff, Measure.map_apply f.continuous.measurable
(PositiveCompacts.isCompact _).measurableSet, Basis.coe_parallelepiped, Basis.coe_map]
erw [← image_parallelepiped, f.toEquiv.preimage_image, addHaar_self]
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts FiniteDimensional
/-!
### The Lebesgue measure is a Haar measure on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`.
-/
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume : addHaarMeasure Icc01 = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume Icc01).symm; simp [Icc01]
#align measure_theory.add_haar_measure_eq_volume MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ^ι`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean | 120 | 124 | theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
addHaarMeasure (piIcc01 ι) = volume := by |
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume (piIcc01 ι)).symm
simp only [piIcc01, volume_pi_pi fun _ => Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, PositiveCompacts.coe_mk,
Compacts.coe_mk, Finset.prod_const_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, Real.volume_Icc, one_smul, sub_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.GeometryOfNumbers
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.VolumeOfBalls
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.Basic
#align_import number_theory.number_field.canonical_embedding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60da01b41bbe4206f05d34fd70c8dd7498717a30"
/-!
# Convex Bodies
The file contains the definitions of several convex bodies lying in the space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`
associated to a number field of signature `K` and proves several existence theorems by applying
*Minkowski Convex Body Theorem* to those.
## Main definitions and results
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodyLT`: The set of points `x` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w` with `f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodySum`: The set of points `x` such that
`∑ w real, ‖x w‖ + 2 * ∑ w complex, ‖x w‖ ≤ B`
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal of `K`.
Assume that `f` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodyLT K f)`, then there exists a
nonzero algebraic number `a` in `I` such that `w a < f w` for all infinite places `w`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal
of `K`. Assume that `B` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodySum K B)` (see
`convexBodySum_volume` for the computation of this volume), then there exists a nonzero algebraic
number `a` in `I` such that `|Norm a| < (B / d) ^ d` where `d` is the degree of `K`.
## Tags
number field, infinite places
-/
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace FiniteDimensional
/-- The space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂` with `(r₁, r₂)` the signature of `K`. -/
local notation "E" K =>
({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)
section convexBodyLT
open Metric NNReal
variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0)
/-- The convex body defined by `f`: the set of points `x : E` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w`. -/
abbrev convexBodyLT : Set (E K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } => ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } => ball 0 (f w)))
theorem convexBodyLT_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) ↔ ∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x < f w := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, mem_ball_zero_iff, Pi.ringHom_apply, ← Complex.norm_real,
embedding_of_isReal_apply, Subtype.forall, ← forall₂_or_left, ← not_isReal_iff_isComplex, em,
forall_true_left, norm_embedding_eq]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/ConvexBody.lean | 70 | 75 | theorem convexBodyLT_neg_mem (x : E K) (hx : x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f)) :
-x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) := by |
simp only [Set.mem_prod, Prod.fst_neg, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ, Pi.neg_apply,
mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_neg, Real.norm_eq_abs, forall_true_left, Subtype.forall,
Prod.snd_neg, Complex.norm_eq_abs] at hx ⊢
exact hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.Besicovitch
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import measure_theory.covering.besicovitch_vector_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Satellite configurations for Besicovitch covering lemma in vector spaces
The Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, in a nice metric space, there exists a number `N`
such that, from any family of balls with bounded radii, one can extract `N` families, each made of
disjoint balls, covering together all the centers of the initial family.
A key tool in the proof of this theorem is the notion of a satellite configuration, i.e., a family
of `N + 1` balls, where the first `N` balls all intersect the last one, but none of them contains
the center of another one and their radii are controlled. This is a technical notion, but it shows
up naturally in the proof of the Besicovitch theorem (which goes through a greedy algorithm): to
ensure that in the end one needs at most `N` families of balls, the crucial property of the
underlying metric space is that there should be no satellite configuration of `N + 1` points.
This file is devoted to the study of this property in vector spaces: we prove the main result
of [Füredi and Loeb, On the best constant for the Besicovitch covering theorem][furedi-loeb1994],
which shows that the optimal such `N` in a vector space coincides with the maximal number
of points one can put inside the unit ball of radius `2` under the condition that their distances
are bounded below by `1`.
In particular, this number is bounded by `5 ^ dim` by a straightforward measure argument.
## Main definitions and results
* `multiplicity E` is the maximal number of points one can put inside the unit ball
of radius `2` in the vector space `E`, under the condition that their distances
are bounded below by `1`.
* `multiplicity_le E` shows that `multiplicity E ≤ 5 ^ (dim E)`.
* `good_τ E` is a constant `> 1`, but close enough to `1` that satellite configurations
with this parameter `τ` are not worst than for `τ = 1`.
* `isEmpty_satelliteConfig_multiplicity` is the main theorem, saying that there are
no satellite configurations of `(multiplicity E) + 1` points, for the parameter `goodτ E`.
-/
universe u
open Metric Set FiniteDimensional MeasureTheory Filter Fin
open scoped ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Besicovitch
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace SatelliteConfig
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
/-- Rescaling a satellite configuration in a vector space, to put the basepoint at `0` and the base
radius at `1`. -/
def centerAndRescale : SatelliteConfig E N τ where
c i := (a.r (last N))⁻¹ • (a.c i - a.c (last N))
r i := (a.r (last N))⁻¹ * a.r i
rpos i := by positivity
h i j hij := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, dist_sub_right, mul_left_comm τ,
Real.norm_of_nonneg]
rcases a.h hij with (⟨H₁, H₂⟩ | ⟨H₁, H₂⟩) <;> [left; right] <;> constructor <;> gcongr
hlast i hi := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, dist_sub_right, mul_left_comm τ,
Real.norm_of_nonneg]
have ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := a.hlast i hi
constructor <;> gcongr
inter i hi := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, ← mul_add, dist_sub_right, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
gcongr
exact a.inter i hi
#align besicovitch.satellite_config.center_and_rescale Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/BesicovitchVectorSpace.lean | 83 | 84 | theorem centerAndRescale_center : a.centerAndRescale.c (last N) = 0 := by |
simp [SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Filtered.Connected
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.TypesFiltered
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Final
/-!
# Final functors with filtered (co)domain
If `C` is a filtered category, then the usual equivalent conditions for a functor `F : C ⥤ D` to be
final can be restated. We show:
* `final_iff_of_isFiltered`: a concrete description of finality which is sometimes a convenient way
to show that a functor is final.
* `final_iff_isFiltered_structuredArrow`: `F` is final if and only if `StructuredArrow d F` is
filtered for all `d : D`, which strengthens the usual statement that `F` is final if and only
if `StructuredArrow d F` is connected for all `d : D`.
Additionally, we show that if `D` is a filtered category and `F : C ⥤ D` is fully faithful and
satisfies the additional condition that for every `d : D` there is an object `c : D` and a morphism
`d ⟶ F.obj c`, then `C` is filtered and `F` is final.
## References
* [M. Kashiwara, P. Schapira, *Categories and Sheaves*][Kashiwara2006], Section 3.2
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
section ArbitraryUniverses
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- If `StructuredArrow d F` is filtered for any `d : D`, then `F : C ⥤ D` is final. This is
simply because filtered categories are connected. More profoundly, the converse is also true if
`C` is filtered, see `final_iff_isFiltered_structuredArrow`. -/
theorem Functor.final_of_isFiltered_structuredArrow [∀ d, IsFiltered (StructuredArrow d F)] :
Final F where
out _ := IsFiltered.isConnected _
/-- If `CostructuredArrow F d` is filtered for any `d : D`, then `F : C ⥤ D` is initial. This is
simply because cofiltered categories are connectged. More profoundly, the converse is also true
if `C` is cofiltered, see `initial_iff_isCofiltered_costructuredArrow`. -/
theorem Functor.initial_of_isCofiltered_costructuredArrow
[∀ d, IsCofiltered (CostructuredArrow F d)] : Initial F where
out _ := IsCofiltered.isConnected _
theorem isFiltered_structuredArrow_of_isFiltered_of_exists [IsFilteredOrEmpty C]
(h₁ : ∀ d, ∃ c, Nonempty (d ⟶ F.obj c)) (h₂ : ∀ {d : D} {c : C} (s s' : d ⟶ F.obj c),
∃ (c' : C) (t : c ⟶ c'), s ≫ F.map t = s' ≫ F.map t) (d : D) :
IsFiltered (StructuredArrow d F) := by
have : Nonempty (StructuredArrow d F) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨f⟩⟩ := h₁ d
exact ⟨.mk f⟩
suffices IsFilteredOrEmpty (StructuredArrow d F) from IsFiltered.mk
refine ⟨fun f g => ?_, fun f g η μ => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, ⟨t, ht⟩⟩ := h₂ (f.hom ≫ F.map (IsFiltered.leftToMax f.right g.right))
(g.hom ≫ F.map (IsFiltered.rightToMax f.right g.right))
refine ⟨.mk (f.hom ≫ F.map (IsFiltered.leftToMax f.right g.right ≫ t)), ?_, ?_, trivial⟩
· exact StructuredArrow.homMk (IsFiltered.leftToMax _ _ ≫ t) rfl
· exact StructuredArrow.homMk (IsFiltered.rightToMax _ _ ≫ t) (by simpa using ht.symm)
· refine ⟨.mk (f.hom ≫ F.map (η.right ≫ IsFiltered.coeqHom η.right μ.right)),
StructuredArrow.homMk (IsFiltered.coeqHom η.right μ.right) (by simp), ?_⟩
simpa using IsFiltered.coeq_condition _ _
theorem isCofiltered_costructuredArrow_of_isCofiltered_of_exists [IsCofilteredOrEmpty C]
(h₁ : ∀ d, ∃ c, Nonempty (F.obj c ⟶ d)) (h₂ : ∀ {d : D} {c : C} (s s' : F.obj c ⟶ d),
∃ (c' : C) (t : c' ⟶ c), F.map t ≫ s = F.map t ≫ s') (d : D) :
IsCofiltered (CostructuredArrow F d) := by
suffices IsFiltered (CostructuredArrow F d)ᵒᵖ from isCofiltered_of_isFiltered_op _
suffices IsFiltered (StructuredArrow (op d) F.op) from
IsFiltered.of_equivalence (costructuredArrowOpEquivalence _ _).symm
apply isFiltered_structuredArrow_of_isFiltered_of_exists
· intro d
obtain ⟨c, ⟨t⟩⟩ := h₁ d.unop
exact ⟨op c, ⟨Quiver.Hom.op t⟩⟩
· intro d c s s'
obtain ⟨c', t, ht⟩ := h₂ s.unop s'.unop
exact ⟨op c', Quiver.Hom.op t, Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ht⟩
/-- If `C` is filtered, then we can give an explicit condition for a functor `F : C ⥤ D` to
be final. The converse is also true, see `final_iff_of_isFiltered`. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Filtered/Final.lean | 91 | 95 | theorem Functor.final_of_exists_of_isFiltered [IsFilteredOrEmpty C]
(h₁ : ∀ d, ∃ c, Nonempty (d ⟶ F.obj c)) (h₂ : ∀ {d : D} {c : C} (s s' : d ⟶ F.obj c),
∃ (c' : C) (t : c ⟶ c'), s ≫ F.map t = s' ≫ F.map t) : Functor.Final F := by |
suffices ∀ d, IsFiltered (StructuredArrow d F) from final_of_isFiltered_structuredArrow F
exact isFiltered_structuredArrow_of_isFiltered_of_exists F h₁ h₂
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs products, sums, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, sum, disjoint union, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
#align mem_nhds_subtype mem_nhds_subtype
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
#align nhds_subtype nhds_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
#align nhds_within_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align nhds_ne_subtype_ne_bot_iff nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
#align discrete_topology_subtype_iff discreteTopology_subtype_iff
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
#align cofinite_topology CofiniteTopology
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
#align cofinite_topology.of CofiniteTopology.of
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align cofinite_topology.is_open_iff' CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff'
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
#align cofinite_topology.is_closed_iff CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
#align cofinite_topology.nhds_eq CofiniteTopology.nhds_eq
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
#align cofinite_topology.mem_nhds_iff CofiniteTopology.mem_nhds_iff
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
[TopologicalSpace ε] [TopologicalSpace ζ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean 4 fails to deduce implicit args
@[simp] theorem continuous_prod_mk {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} :
(Continuous fun x => (f x, g x)) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
(@continuous_inf_rng X (Y × Z) _ _ (TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _)).trans <|
continuous_induced_rng.and continuous_induced_rng
#align continuous_prod_mk continuous_prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_fst : Continuous (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).1
#align continuous_fst continuous_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.fst {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).1 :=
continuous_fst.comp hf
#align continuous.fst Continuous.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.fst' {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.fst :=
hf.comp continuous_fst
#align continuous.fst' Continuous.fst'
theorem continuousAt_fst {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.fst p :=
continuous_fst.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_fst continuousAt_fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.fst {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).1) x :=
continuousAt_fst.comp hf
#align continuous_at.fst ContinuousAt.fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst' {f : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst' ContinuousAt.fst'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.fst'' {f : X → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.fst) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.fst) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_fst
#align continuous_at.fst'' ContinuousAt.fst''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).1) l (𝓝 <| p.1) :=
continuousAt_fst.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_snd : Continuous (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
(continuous_prod_mk.1 continuous_id).2
#align continuous_snd continuous_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.snd {f : X → Y × Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X => (f x).2 :=
continuous_snd.comp hf
#align continuous.snd Continuous.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous -/
theorem Continuous.snd' {f : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x : X × Y => f x.snd :=
hf.comp continuous_snd
#align continuous.snd' Continuous.snd'
theorem continuousAt_snd {p : X × Y} : ContinuousAt Prod.snd p :=
continuous_snd.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_snd continuousAt_snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.snd {f : X → Y × Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X => (f x).2) x :=
continuousAt_snd.comp hf
#align continuous_at.snd ContinuousAt.snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd' {f : Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) (x, y) :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd' ContinuousAt.snd'
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is continuous at `x : X × Y` -/
theorem ContinuousAt.snd'' {f : Y → Z} {x : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x.snd) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : X × Y => f x.snd) x :=
hf.comp continuousAt_snd
#align continuous_at.snd'' ContinuousAt.snd''
theorem Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds {l : Filter X} {f : X → Y × Z} {p : Y × Z}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 p)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ (f a).2) l (𝓝 <| p.2) :=
continuousAt_snd.tendsto.comp h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.prod_mk {f : Z → X} {g : Z → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => (f x, g x) :=
continuous_prod_mk.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.prod_mk Continuous.prod_mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk (x : X) : Continuous fun y : Y => (x, y) :=
continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align continuous.prod.mk Continuous.Prod.mk
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.Prod.mk_left (y : Y) : Continuous fun x : X => (x, y) :=
continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const
#align continuous.prod.mk_left Continuous.Prod.mk_left
/-- If `f x y` is continuous in `x` for all `y ∈ s`,
then the set of `x` such that `f x` maps `s` to `t` is closed. -/
lemma IsClosed.setOf_mapsTo {α : Type*} {f : X → α → Z} {s : Set α} {t : Set Z} (ht : IsClosed t)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Continuous (f · a)) : IsClosed {x | MapsTo (f x) s t} := by
simpa only [MapsTo, setOf_forall] using isClosed_biInter fun y hy ↦ ht.preimage (hf y hy)
theorem Continuous.comp₂ {g : X × Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w) :=
hg.comp <| he.prod_mk hf
#align continuous.comp₂ Continuous.comp₂
theorem Continuous.comp₃ {g : X × Y × Z → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) :
Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w) :=
hg.comp₂ he <| hf.prod_mk hk
#align continuous.comp₃ Continuous.comp₃
theorem Continuous.comp₄ {g : X × Y × Z × ζ → ε} (hg : Continuous g) {e : W → X} (he : Continuous e)
{f : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {k : W → Z} (hk : Continuous k) {l : W → ζ}
(hl : Continuous l) : Continuous fun w => g (e w, f w, k w, l w) :=
hg.comp₃ he hf <| hk.prod_mk hl
#align continuous.comp₄ Continuous.comp₄
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.prod_map {f : Z → X} {g : W → Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun p : Z × W => (f p.1, g p.2) :=
hf.fst'.prod_mk hg.snd'
#align continuous.prod_map Continuous.prod_map
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta1; haveI := tb1; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_left _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb1 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta1 tb1 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_left₂ continuous_inf_dom_left₂
/-- A version of `continuous_inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {ta1 ta2 : TopologicalSpace X}
{tb1 tb2 : TopologicalSpace Y} {tc1 : TopologicalSpace Z}
(h : by haveI := ta2; haveI := tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ta1 ⊓ ta2; haveI := tb1 ⊓ tb2; exact Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have ha := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id ta1 ta2 ta2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @continuous_inf_dom_right _ _ id tb1 tb2 tb2 (@continuous_id _ (id _))
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ ta2 tb2 (ta1 ⊓ ta2) (tb1 ⊓ tb2) _ _ ha hb
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_continuous_id
#align continuous_inf_dom_right₂ continuous_inf_dom_right₂
/-- A version of `continuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem continuous_sInf_dom₂ {X Y Z} {f : X → Y → Z} {tas : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
{tbs : Set (TopologicalSpace Y)} {tX : TopologicalSpace X} {tY : TopologicalSpace Y}
{tc : TopologicalSpace Z} (hX : tX ∈ tas) (hY : tY ∈ tbs)
(hf : Continuous fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf tas; haveI := sInf tbs;
exact @Continuous _ _ _ tc fun p : X × Y => f p.1 p.2 := by
have hX := continuous_sInf_dom hX continuous_id
have hY := continuous_sInf_dom hY continuous_id
have h_continuous_id := @Continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ tX tY (sInf tas) (sInf tbs) _ _ hX hY
exact @Continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_continuous_id
#align continuous_Inf_dom₂ continuous_sInf_dom₂
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds {p : X → Prop} {x : X} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (y : Y) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).1 :=
continuousAt_fst h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inl_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds {p : Y → Prop} {y : Y} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p (x : X × Y).2 :=
continuousAt_snd h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_inr_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds {px : X → Prop} {x} (hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, px x) {py : Y → Prop}
{y} (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, py y) : ∀ᶠ p in 𝓝 (x, y), px (p : X × Y).1 ∧ py p.2 :=
(hx.prod_inl_nhds y).and (hy.prod_inr_nhds x)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_mk_nhds
theorem continuous_swap : Continuous (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) :=
continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst
#align continuous_swap continuous_swap
lemma isClosedMap_swap : IsClosedMap (Prod.swap : X × Y → Y × X) := fun s hs ↦ by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
exact hs.preimage continuous_swap
theorem Continuous.uncurry_left {f : X → Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous (f x) :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk _)
#align continuous_uncurry_left Continuous.uncurry_left
theorem Continuous.uncurry_right {f : X → Y → Z} (y : Y) (h : Continuous (uncurry f)) :
Continuous fun a => f a y :=
h.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk_left _)
#align continuous_uncurry_right Continuous.uncurry_right
-- 2024-03-09
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_left := Continuous.uncurry_left
@[deprecated] alias continuous_uncurry_right := Continuous.uncurry_right
theorem continuous_curry {g : X × Y → Z} (x : X) (h : Continuous g) : Continuous (curry g x) :=
Continuous.uncurry_left x h
#align continuous_curry continuous_curry
theorem IsOpen.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).inter (ht.preimage continuous_snd)
#align is_open.prod IsOpen.prod
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Lean fails to find `t₁` and `t₂` by unification
theorem nhds_prod_eq {x : X} {y : Y} : 𝓝 (x, y) = 𝓝 x ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, instTopologicalSpaceProd, nhds_inf (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.fst _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.induced Prod.snd _), nhds_induced, nhds_induced]
#align nhds_prod_eq nhds_prod_eq
-- Porting note: moved from `Topology.ContinuousOn`
theorem nhdsWithin_prod_eq (x : X) (y : Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (x, y) = 𝓝[s] x ×ˢ 𝓝[t] y := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
#align nhds_within_prod_eq nhdsWithin_prod_eq
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝 y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff mem_nhds_prod_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} {tx : Set X} {ty : Set Y} :
s ∈ 𝓝[tx ×ˢ ty] (x, y) ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[tx] x, ∃ v ∈ 𝓝[ty] y, u ×ˢ v ⊆ s := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, mem_prod_iff]
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds {ιX ιY : Type*} {px : ιX → Prop} {py : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : (𝓝 x).HasBasis px sx)
(hy : (𝓝 y).HasBasis py sy) :
(𝓝 (x, y)).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => px i.1 ∧ py i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact hx.prod hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds
-- Porting note: moved up
theorem Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds' {ιX ιY : Type*} {pX : ιX → Prop} {pY : ιY → Prop}
{sx : ιX → Set X} {sy : ιY → Set Y} {p : X × Y} (hx : (𝓝 p.1).HasBasis pX sx)
(hy : (𝓝 p.2).HasBasis pY sy) :
(𝓝 p).HasBasis (fun i : ιX × ιY => pX i.1 ∧ pY i.2) fun i => sx i.1 ×ˢ sy i.2 :=
hx.prod_nhds hy
#align filter.has_basis.prod_nhds' Filter.HasBasis.prod_nhds'
theorem mem_nhds_prod_iff' {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set (X × Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ ∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).prod_nhds (nhds_basis_opens y)).mem_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Prod.exists, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_nhds_prod_iff' mem_nhds_prod_iff'
theorem Prod.tendsto_iff {X} (seq : X → Y × Z) {f : Filter X} (p : Y × Z) :
Tendsto seq f (𝓝 p) ↔
Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).fst) f (𝓝 p.fst) ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (seq n).snd) f (𝓝 p.snd) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.tendsto_prod_iff']
#align prod.tendsto_iff Prod.tendsto_iff
instance [DiscreteTopology X] [DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X × Y) :=
discreteTopology_iff_nhds.2 fun (a, b) => by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete X, nhds_discrete Y, prod_pure_pure]
theorem prod_mem_nhds_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 y := by rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_mem_prod_iff]
#align prod_mem_nhds_iff prod_mem_nhds_iff
theorem prod_mem_nhds {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hy : t ∈ 𝓝 y) :
s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) :=
prod_mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
#align prod_mem_nhds prod_mem_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds : IsOpen { p : X × X | Disjoint (𝓝 p.1) (𝓝 p.2) } := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall, mem_setOf_eq]
intro x y h
obtain ⟨U, hU, V, hV, hd⟩ := ((nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y)).mp h
exact mem_nhds_prod_iff'.mpr ⟨U, V, hU.2, hU.1, hV.2, hV.1, fun ⟨x', y'⟩ ⟨hx', hy'⟩ =>
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem hd (hU.2.mem_nhds hx') (hV.2.mem_nhds hy')⟩
#align is_open_set_of_disjoint_nhds_nhds isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hx : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) (hy : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 y, q y) : ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x, y), p z.1 ∧ q z.2 :=
prod_mem_nhds hx hy
#align filter.eventually.prod_nhds Filter.Eventually.prod_nhds
theorem nhds_swap (x : X) (y : Y) : 𝓝 (x, y) = (𝓝 (y, x)).map Prod.swap := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.prod_comm, nhds_prod_eq]; rfl
#align nhds_swap nhds_swap
theorem Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds {γ} {x : X} {y : Y} {f : Filter γ} {mx : γ → X} {my : γ → Y}
(hx : Tendsto mx f (𝓝 x)) (hy : Tendsto my f (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun c => (mx c, my c)) f (𝓝 (x, y)) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk hx hy
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk_nhds Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds {p : X × Y → Prop} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x, y), p x) : ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ y' in 𝓝 y, p (x', y') := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq] at h
exact h.curry
#align filter.eventually.curry_nhds Filter.Eventually.curry_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.prod {f : X → Y} {g : X → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
hf.prod_mk_nhds hg
#align continuous_at.prod ContinuousAt.prod
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {p : X × Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f p.fst)
(hg : ContinuousAt g p.snd) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) p :=
hf.fst''.prod hg.snd''
#align continuous_at.prod_map ContinuousAt.prod_map
theorem ContinuousAt.prod_map' {f : X → Z} {g : Y → W} {x : X} {y : Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) : ContinuousAt (fun p : X × Y => (f p.1, g p.2)) (x, y) :=
hf.fst'.prod hg.snd'
#align continuous_at.prod_map' ContinuousAt.prod_map'
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂ {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x :=
ContinuousAt.comp hf (hg.prod hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_of_eq {f : Y × Z → W} {g : X → Y} {h : X → Z} {x : X} {y : Y × Z}
(hf : ContinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hh : ContinuousAt h x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂ hg hh
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their first argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_left {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {y : Y} :
Continuous fun x ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
alias Continuous.along_fst := Continuous.curry_left
/-- Continuous functions on products are continuous in their second argument -/
theorem Continuous.curry_right {f : X × Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) {x : X} :
Continuous fun y ↦ f (x, y) :=
hf.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
alias Continuous.along_snd := Continuous.curry_right
-- todo: prove a version of `generateFrom_union` with `image2 (∩) s t` in the LHS and use it here
theorem prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq {X Y : Type*} {s : Set (Set X)} {t : Set (Set Y)}
(hs : ⋃₀ s = univ) (ht : ⋃₀ t = univ) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Y (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t) :=
let G := generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) s t)
le_antisymm
(le_generateFrom fun g ⟨u, hu, v, hv, g_eq⟩ =>
g_eq.symm ▸
@IsOpen.prod _ _ (generateFrom s) (generateFrom t) _ _ (GenerateOpen.basic _ hu)
(GenerateOpen.basic _ hv))
(le_inf
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun u hu =>
have : ⋃ v ∈ t, u ×ˢ v = Prod.fst ⁻¹' u := by
simp_rw [← prod_iUnion, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, ht, prod_univ]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.fst ⁻¹' u) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun v =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hv => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp <|
le_generateFrom fun v hv =>
have : ⋃ u ∈ s, u ×ˢ v = Prod.snd ⁻¹' v := by
simp_rw [← iUnion_prod_const, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, hs, univ_prod]
show G.IsOpen (Prod.snd ⁻¹' v) by
rw [← this]
exact
isOpen_iUnion fun u =>
isOpen_iUnion fun hu => GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, hu, _, hv, rfl⟩))
#align prod_generate_from_generate_from_eq prod_generateFrom_generateFrom_eq
-- todo: use the previous lemma?
theorem prod_eq_generateFrom :
instTopologicalSpaceProd =
generateFrom { g | ∃ (s : Set X) (t : Set Y), IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ g = s ×ˢ t } :=
le_antisymm (le_generateFrom fun g ⟨s, t, hs, ht, g_eq⟩ => g_eq.symm ▸ hs.prod ht)
(le_inf
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨t, univ, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩)
(forall_mem_image.2 fun t ht =>
GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨univ, t, by simpa [Set.prod_eq] using ht⟩))
#align prod_eq_generate_from prod_eq_generateFrom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: align with `mem_nhds_prod_iff'`
theorem isOpen_prod_iff {s : Set (X × Y)} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s →
∃ u v, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ a ∈ u ∧ b ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ s :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.trans <| by simp_rw [Prod.forall, mem_nhds_prod_iff', and_left_comm]
#align is_open_prod_iff isOpen_prod_iff
/-- A product of induced topologies is induced by the product map -/
theorem prod_induced_induced (f : X → Y) (g : Z → W) :
@instTopologicalSpaceProd X Z (induced f ‹_›) (induced g ‹_›) =
induced (fun p => (f p.1, g p.2)) instTopologicalSpaceProd := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceProd
simp_rw [induced_inf, induced_compose]
rfl
#align prod_induced_induced prod_induced_induced
#noalign continuous_uncurry_of_discrete_topology_left
/-- Given a neighborhood `s` of `(x, x)`, then `(x, x)` has a square open neighborhood
that is a subset of `s`. -/
theorem exists_nhds_square {s : Set (X × X)} {x : X} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 (x, x)) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ U ×ˢ U ⊆ s := by
simpa [nhds_prod_eq, (nhds_basis_opens x).prod_self.mem_iff, and_assoc, and_left_comm] using hx
#align exists_nhds_square exists_nhds_square
/-- `Prod.fst` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}`
to `𝓝 x.1`. -/
theorem map_fst_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝[Prod.snd ⁻¹' {x.2}] x) = 𝓝 x.1 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_fst.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hu fun z hz => H _ hz _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hv) rfl
#align map_fst_nhds_within map_fst_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.fst (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.1 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_fst <| (map_fst_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_fst_nhds map_fst_nhds
/-- The first projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_fst : IsOpenMap (@Prod.fst X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_fst_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_fst isOpenMap_fst
/-- `Prod.snd` maps neighborhood of `x : X × Y` within the section `Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}`
to `𝓝 x.2`. -/
theorem map_snd_nhdsWithin (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝[Prod.fst ⁻¹' {x.1}] x) = 𝓝 x.2 := by
refine le_antisymm (continuousAt_snd.mono_left inf_le_left) fun s hs => ?_
rcases x with ⟨x, y⟩
rw [mem_map, nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_prod_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, H⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_preimage] at H
exact mem_of_superset hv fun z hz => H _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hu) _ hz rfl
#align map_snd_nhds_within map_snd_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_nhds (x : X × Y) : map Prod.snd (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x.2 :=
le_antisymm continuousAt_snd <| (map_snd_nhdsWithin x).symm.trans_le (map_mono inf_le_left)
#align map_snd_nhds map_snd_nhds
/-- The second projection in a product of topological spaces sends open sets to open sets. -/
theorem isOpenMap_snd : IsOpenMap (@Prod.snd X Y) :=
isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le.2 fun x => (map_snd_nhds x).ge
#align is_open_map_snd isOpenMap_snd
/-- A product set is open in a product space if and only if each factor is open, or one of them is
empty -/
theorem isOpen_prod_iff' {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} :
IsOpen (s ×ˢ t) ↔ IsOpen s ∧ IsOpen t ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
· have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := prod_nonempty_iff.1 h
constructor
· intro (H : IsOpen (s ×ˢ t))
refine Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· show IsOpen s
rw [← fst_image_prod s st.2]
exact isOpenMap_fst _ H
· show IsOpen t
rw [← snd_image_prod st.1 t]
exact isOpenMap_snd _ H
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, not_false_iff, or_false_iff] at H
exact H.1.prod H.2
#align is_open_prod_iff' isOpen_prod_iff'
theorem closure_prod_eq {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} : closure (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ closure t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
simp_rw [mem_prod, mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_prod_eq, prod_neBot]
#align closure_prod_eq closure_prod_eq
theorem interior_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) : interior (s ×ˢ t) = interior s ×ˢ interior t :=
ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp only [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_prod, prod_mem_nhds_iff]
#align interior_prod_eq interior_prod_eq
theorem frontier_prod_eq (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) :
frontier (s ×ˢ t) = closure s ×ˢ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ˢ closure t := by
simp only [frontier, closure_prod_eq, interior_prod_eq, prod_diff_prod]
#align frontier_prod_eq frontier_prod_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_prod_univ_eq (s : Set X) :
frontier (s ×ˢ (univ : Set Y)) = frontier s ×ˢ univ := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_prod_univ_eq frontier_prod_univ_eq
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ_prod_eq (s : Set Y) :
frontier ((univ : Set X) ×ˢ s) = univ ×ˢ frontier s := by
simp [frontier_prod_eq]
#align frontier_univ_prod_eq frontier_univ_prod_eq
theorem map_mem_closure₂ {f : X → Y → Z} {x : X} {y : Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {u : Set Z}
(hf : Continuous (uncurry f)) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure t)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b ∈ u) : f x y ∈ closure u :=
have H₁ : (x, y) ∈ closure (s ×ˢ t) := by simpa only [closure_prod_eq] using mk_mem_prod hx hy
have H₂ : MapsTo (uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) u := forall_prod_set.2 h
H₂.closure hf H₁
#align map_mem_closure₂ map_mem_closure₂
theorem IsClosed.prod {s₁ : Set X} {s₂ : Set Y} (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) :
IsClosed (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
closure_eq_iff_isClosed.mp <| by simp only [h₁.closure_eq, h₂.closure_eq, closure_prod_eq]
#align is_closed.prod IsClosed.prod
/-- The product of two dense sets is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.prod {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) : Dense (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun x => by
rw [closure_prod_eq]
exact ⟨hs x.1, ht x.2⟩
#align dense.prod Dense.prod
/-- If `f` and `g` are maps with dense range, then `Prod.map f g` has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.prod_map {ι : Type*} {κ : Type*} {f : ι → Y} {g : κ → Z} (hf : DenseRange f)
(hg : DenseRange g) : DenseRange (Prod.map f g) := by
simpa only [DenseRange, prod_range_range_eq] using hf.prod hg
#align dense_range.prod_map DenseRange.prod_map
theorem Inducing.prod_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Inducing f) (hg : Inducing g) :
Inducing (Prod.map f g) :=
inducing_iff_nhds.2 fun (x, z) => by simp_rw [Prod.map_def, nhds_prod_eq, hf.nhds_eq_comap,
hg.nhds_eq_comap, prod_comap_comap_eq]
#align inducing.prod_mk Inducing.prod_map
@[simp]
theorem inducing_const_prod {x : X} {f : Y → Z} : (Inducing fun x' => (x, f x')) ↔ Inducing f := by
simp_rw [inducing_iff, instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose, Function.comp,
induced_const, top_inf_eq]
#align inducing_const_prod inducing_const_prod
@[simp]
theorem inducing_prod_const {y : Y} {f : X → Z} : (Inducing fun x => (f x, y)) ↔ Inducing f := by
simp_rw [inducing_iff, instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose, Function.comp,
induced_const, inf_top_eq]
#align inducing_prod_const inducing_prod_const
theorem Embedding.prod_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Embedding f) (hg : Embedding g) :
Embedding (Prod.map f g) :=
{ hf.toInducing.prod_map hg.toInducing with
inj := fun ⟨x₁, z₁⟩ ⟨x₂, z₂⟩ => by simp [hf.inj.eq_iff, hg.inj.eq_iff] }
#align embedding.prod_mk Embedding.prod_map
protected theorem IsOpenMap.prod {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hg : IsOpenMap g) :
IsOpenMap fun p : X × Z => (f p.1, g p.2) := by
rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le]
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_prod_eq, ← Filter.prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono (hf.nhds_le a) (hg.nhds_le b)
#align is_open_map.prod IsOpenMap.prod
protected theorem OpenEmbedding.prod {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : OpenEmbedding f)
(hg : OpenEmbedding g) : OpenEmbedding fun x : X × Z => (f x.1, g x.2) :=
openEmbedding_of_embedding_open (hf.1.prod_map hg.1) (hf.isOpenMap.prod hg.isOpenMap)
#align open_embedding.prod OpenEmbedding.prod
theorem embedding_graph {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : Embedding fun x => (x, f x) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (continuous_id.prod_mk hf) continuous_fst embedding_id
#align embedding_graph embedding_graph
theorem embedding_prod_mk (x : X) : Embedding (Prod.mk x : Y → X × Y) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (Continuous.Prod.mk x) continuous_snd embedding_id
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Sum
open Sum
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace W]
theorem continuous_sum_dom {f : X ⊕ Y → Z} :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∧ Continuous (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
(continuous_sup_dom (t₁ := TopologicalSpace.coinduced Sum.inl _)
(t₂ := TopologicalSpace.coinduced Sum.inr _)).trans <|
continuous_coinduced_dom.and continuous_coinduced_dom
#align continuous_sum_dom continuous_sum_dom
theorem continuous_sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} :
Continuous (Sum.elim f g) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
continuous_sum_dom
#align continuous_sum_elim continuous_sum_elim
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (Sum.elim f g) :=
continuous_sum_elim.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.sum_elim Continuous.sum_elim
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_isLeft : Continuous (isLeft : X ⊕ Y → Bool) :=
continuous_sum_dom.2 ⟨continuous_const, continuous_const⟩
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_isRight : Continuous (isRight : X ⊕ Y → Bool) :=
continuous_sum_dom.2 ⟨continuous_const, continuous_const⟩
@[continuity]
-- Porting note: the proof was `continuous_sup_rng_left continuous_coinduced_rng`
theorem continuous_inl : Continuous (@inl X Y) := ⟨fun _ => And.left⟩
#align continuous_inl continuous_inl
@[continuity]
-- Porting note: the proof was `continuous_sup_rng_right continuous_coinduced_rng`
theorem continuous_inr : Continuous (@inr X Y) := ⟨fun _ => And.right⟩
#align continuous_inr continuous_inr
theorem isOpen_sum_iff {s : Set (X ⊕ Y)} : IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen (inl ⁻¹' s) ∧ IsOpen (inr ⁻¹' s) :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_open_sum_iff isOpen_sum_iff
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem isClosed_sum_iff {s : Set (X ⊕ Y)} :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed (inl ⁻¹' s) ∧ IsClosed (inr ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_compl]
theorem isOpenMap_inl : IsOpenMap (@inl X Y) := fun u hu => by
simpa [isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_image_eq u Sum.inl_injective]
#align is_open_map_inl isOpenMap_inl
theorem isOpenMap_inr : IsOpenMap (@inr X Y) := fun u hu => by
simpa [isOpen_sum_iff, preimage_image_eq u Sum.inr_injective]
#align is_open_map_inr isOpenMap_inr
theorem openEmbedding_inl : OpenEmbedding (@inl X Y) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_inl inl_injective isOpenMap_inl
#align open_embedding_inl openEmbedding_inl
theorem openEmbedding_inr : OpenEmbedding (@inr X Y) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_inr inr_injective isOpenMap_inr
#align open_embedding_inr openEmbedding_inr
theorem embedding_inl : Embedding (@inl X Y) :=
openEmbedding_inl.1
#align embedding_inl embedding_inl
theorem embedding_inr : Embedding (@inr X Y) :=
openEmbedding_inr.1
#align embedding_inr embedding_inr
theorem isOpen_range_inl : IsOpen (range (inl : X → X ⊕ Y)) :=
openEmbedding_inl.2
#align is_open_range_inl isOpen_range_inl
theorem isOpen_range_inr : IsOpen (range (inr : Y → X ⊕ Y)) :=
openEmbedding_inr.2
#align is_open_range_inr isOpen_range_inr
theorem isClosed_range_inl : IsClosed (range (inl : X → X ⊕ Y)) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_range_inl]
exact isOpen_range_inr
#align is_closed_range_inl isClosed_range_inl
theorem isClosed_range_inr : IsClosed (range (inr : Y → X ⊕ Y)) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_range_inr]
exact isOpen_range_inl
#align is_closed_range_inr isClosed_range_inr
theorem closedEmbedding_inl : ClosedEmbedding (inl : X → X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨embedding_inl, isClosed_range_inl⟩
#align closed_embedding_inl closedEmbedding_inl
theorem closedEmbedding_inr : ClosedEmbedding (inr : Y → X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨embedding_inr, isClosed_range_inr⟩
#align closed_embedding_inr closedEmbedding_inr
theorem nhds_inl (x : X) : 𝓝 (inl x : X ⊕ Y) = map inl (𝓝 x) :=
(openEmbedding_inl.map_nhds_eq _).symm
#align nhds_inl nhds_inl
theorem nhds_inr (y : Y) : 𝓝 (inr y : X ⊕ Y) = map inr (𝓝 y) :=
(openEmbedding_inr.map_nhds_eq _).symm
#align nhds_inr nhds_inr
@[simp]
theorem continuous_sum_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} :
Continuous (Sum.map f g) ↔ Continuous f ∧ Continuous g :=
continuous_sum_elim.trans <|
embedding_inl.continuous_iff.symm.and embedding_inr.continuous_iff.symm
#align continuous_sum_map continuous_sum_map
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.sum_map {f : X → Y} {g : Z → W} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (Sum.map f g) :=
continuous_sum_map.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align continuous.sum_map Continuous.sum_map
theorem isOpenMap_sum {f : X ⊕ Y → Z} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ (IsOpenMap fun a => f (inl a)) ∧ IsOpenMap fun b => f (inr b) := by
simp only [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Sum.forall, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, Filter.map_map, comp]
#align is_open_map_sum isOpenMap_sum
@[simp]
theorem isOpenMap_sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} :
IsOpenMap (Sum.elim f g) ↔ IsOpenMap f ∧ IsOpenMap g := by
simp only [isOpenMap_sum, elim_inl, elim_inr]
#align is_open_map_sum_elim isOpenMap_sum_elim
theorem IsOpenMap.sum_elim {f : X → Z} {g : Y → Z} (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hg : IsOpenMap g) :
IsOpenMap (Sum.elim f g) :=
isOpenMap_sum_elim.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align is_open_map.sum_elim IsOpenMap.sum_elim
end Sum
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] {p : X → Prop}
theorem inducing_subtype_val {t : Set Y} : Inducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
#align inducing_coe inducing_subtype_val
theorem Inducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : Inducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : Inducing f :=
inducing_subtype_val.comp h
#align inducing.of_cod_restrict Inducing.of_codRestrict
theorem embedding_subtype_val : Embedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨inducing_subtype_val, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
#align embedding_subtype_coe embedding_subtype_val
theorem closedEmbedding_subtype_val (h : IsClosed { a | p a }) :
ClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨embedding_subtype_val, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
#align closed_embedding_subtype_coe closedEmbedding_subtype_val
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
#align continuous_subtype_val continuous_subtype_val
#align continuous_subtype_coe continuous_subtype_val
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
#align continuous.subtype_coe Continuous.subtype_val
theorem IsOpen.openEmbedding_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
OpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨embedding_subtype_val, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
#align is_open.open_embedding_subtype_coe IsOpen.openEmbedding_subtype_val
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.openEmbedding_subtype_val.isOpenMap
#align is_open.is_open_map_subtype_coe IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
#align is_open_map.restrict IsOpenMap.restrict
nonrec theorem IsClosed.closedEmbedding_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
ClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
closedEmbedding_subtype_val hs
#align is_closed.closed_embedding_subtype_coe IsClosed.closedEmbedding_subtype_val
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
#align continuous.subtype_mk Continuous.subtype_mk
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
#align continuous.subtype_map Continuous.subtype_map
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
#align continuous_inclusion continuous_inclusion
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_subtype_coe continuousAt_subtype_val
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [inducing_subtype_val.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
#align subtype.dense_iff Subtype.dense_iff
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [inducing_subtype_val.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
#align map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
#align nhds_subtype_eq_comap nhds_subtype_eq_comap
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
#align tendsto_subtype_rng tendsto_subtype_rng
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
#align closure_subtype closure_subtype
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
inducing_subtype_val.continuousAt_iff
#align continuous_at_cod_restrict_iff continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
#align continuous_at.cod_restrict ContinuousAt.codRestrict
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
#align continuous_at.restrict ContinuousAt.restrict
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
#align continuous_at.restrict_preimage ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
#align continuous.cod_restrict Continuous.codRestrict
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
theorem Inducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : Inducing e) {s : Set Y} (hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) :
Inducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
inducing_of_inducing_compose (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val he
#align inducing.cod_restrict Inducing.codRestrict
theorem Embedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : Embedding e) (s : Set Y) (hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) :
Embedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
embedding_of_embedding_compose (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val he
#align embedding.cod_restrict Embedding.codRestrict
theorem embedding_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Embedding (inclusion h) :=
embedding_subtype_val.codRestrict _ _
#align embedding_inclusion embedding_inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(embedding_inclusion ts).discreteTopology
#align discrete_topology.of_subset DiscreteTopology.of_subset
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem quotientMap_quot_mk : QuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
#align quotient_map_quot_mk quotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
#align continuous_quot_mk continuous_quot_mk
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
#align continuous_quot_lift continuous_quot_lift
theorem quotientMap_quotient_mk' : QuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
quotientMap_quot_mk
#align quotient_map_quotient_mk quotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
#align continuous_quotient_mk continuous_quotient_mk'
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
#align continuous.quotient_lift Continuous.quotient_lift
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, @Setoid.r _ s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
#align continuous.quotient_lift_on' Continuous.quotient_liftOn'
@[continuity] theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
#align continuous.quotient_map' Continuous.quotient_map'
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp]
#align continuous_pi_iff continuous_pi_iff
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
#align continuous_pi continuous_pi
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
#align continuous_apply continuous_apply
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
#align continuous_apply_apply continuous_apply_apply
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
#align continuous_at_apply continuousAt_apply
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.apply Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 1,305 | 1,306 | theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by |
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
/-!
# Theory of degrees of polynomials
Some of the main results include
- `natDegree_comp_le` : The degree of the composition is at most the product of degrees
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {ι : Type w} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Degree
theorem natDegree_comp_le : natDegree (p.comp q) ≤ natDegree p * natDegree q :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : p.comp q = 0 then by rw [h0, natDegree_zero]; exact Nat.zero_le _
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
↑(natDegree (p.comp q)) = degree (p.comp q) := (degree_eq_natDegree h0).symm
_ = _ := congr_arg degree comp_eq_sum_left
_ ≤ _ := degree_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ _ :=
Finset.sup_le fun n hn =>
calc
degree (C (coeff p n) * q ^ n) ≤ degree (C (coeff p n)) + degree (q ^ n) :=
degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • degree q :=
(add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_pow_le _ _))
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • ↑(natDegree q) :=
(add_le_add_left (nsmul_le_nsmul_right (@degree_le_natDegree _ _ q) n) _)
_ = (n * natDegree q : ℕ) := by
rw [natDegree_C, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, nsmul_eq_mul];
simp
_ ≤ (natDegree p * natDegree q : ℕ) :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mem_support_iff.1 hn))
(Nat.zero_le _)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_comp_le Polynomial.natDegree_comp_le
theorem degree_pos_of_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (h : IsRoot p a) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hlt
rw [IsRoot, this, eval_C] at h
simp only [h, RingHom.map_zero] at this
exact hp this
#align polynomial.degree_pos_of_root Polynomial.degree_pos_of_root
theorem natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero : p.natDegree ≤ n ↔ ∀ N : ℕ, n < N → p.coeff N = 0 := by
simp_rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero Polynomial.natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_left {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le h qn⟩
refine natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr fun m hm => ?_
convert natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp h m hm using 1
rw [coeff_add, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp qn _ hm, add_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le_iff_left Polynomial.natDegree_add_le_iff_left
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_right {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ q.natDegree ≤ n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ pn
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_le_iff_right Polynomial.natDegree_add_le_iff_right
theorem natDegree_C_mul_le (a : R) (f : R[X]) : (C a * f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree :=
calc
(C a * f).natDegree ≤ (C a).natDegree + f.natDegree := natDegree_mul_le
_ = 0 + f.natDegree := by rw [natDegree_C a]
_ = f.natDegree := zero_add _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_le Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_le
theorem natDegree_mul_C_le (f : R[X]) (a : R) : (f * C a).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree :=
calc
(f * C a).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree + (C a).natDegree := natDegree_mul_le
_ = f.natDegree + 0 := by rw [natDegree_C a]
_ = f.natDegree := add_zero _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_C_le Polynomial.natDegree_mul_C_le
theorem eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (ns : n ∈ p.support) :
p.natDegree = n :=
le_antisymm pn (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ ns)
#align polynomial.eq_nat_degree_of_le_mem_support Polynomial.eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support
theorem natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : ai * a = 1) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_C_mul_le a p)
(calc
p.natDegree = (1 * p).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← one_mul p]
_ = (C ai * (C a * p)).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (C a * p).natDegree := natDegree_C_mul_le ai (C a * p))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : a * ai = 1) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_mul_C_le p a)
(calc
p.natDegree = (p * 1).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← mul_one p]
_ = (p * C a * C ai).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (p * C a).natDegree := natDegree_mul_C_le (p * C a) ai)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one Polynomial.natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `nat_degree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leading_coeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : p.leadingCoeff * a ≠ 0) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_mul_C_le p a) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_mul_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `nat_degree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leading_coeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : a * p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_C_mul_le a p) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_C_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_add_coeff_mul (f g : R[X]) :
(f * g).coeff (f.natDegree + g.natDegree) = f.coeff f.natDegree * g.coeff g.natDegree := by
simp only [coeff_natDegree, coeff_mul_degree_add_degree]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_add_coeff_mul Polynomial.natDegree_add_coeff_mul
theorem natDegree_lt_coeff_mul (h : p.natDegree + q.natDegree < m + n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (natDegree_mul_le.trans_lt h)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_coeff_mul Polynomial.natDegree_lt_coeff_mul
theorem coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le (pm : p.natDegree ≤ m) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = p.coeff m * q.coeff n := by
simp_rw [← Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply, toFinsupp_mul]
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.apply_add_of_supDegree_le ?_ Function.injective_id ?_ ?_
· simp
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le
theorem coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p ^ m).coeff (m * n) = p.coeff n ^ m := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ← hm, Nat.succ_mul, coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le _ pn]
refine natDegree_pow_le.trans (le_trans ?_ (le_refl _))
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left pn m.zero_le
#align polynomial.coeff_pow_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le
theorem coeff_pow_eq_ite_of_natDegree_le_of_le {o : ℕ}
(pn : natDegree p ≤ n) (mno : m * n ≤ o) :
coeff (p ^ m) o = if o = m * n then (coeff p n) ^ m else 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o (m * n) with rfl | h
· simpa only [ite_true] using coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le pn
· simpa only [h, ite_false] using coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <|
lt_of_le_of_lt (natDegree_pow_le_of_le m pn) (lt_of_le_of_ne mno h.symm)
theorem coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt (qn : q.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = p.coeff n :=
(coeff_add _ _ _).trans <|
(congr_arg _ <| coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| qn).trans <| add_zero _
#align polynomial.coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt Polynomial.coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt
theorem coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt (pn : p.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = q.coeff n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt pn
#align polynomial.coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt Polynomial.coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt
theorem degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on degree ∘ f)) :
degree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => degree (f i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with x s hx IH
· simp
· simp only [hx, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff, Finset.sup_insert]
specialize IH (h.mono fun _ => by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
rcases lt_trichotomy (degree (f x)) (degree (s.sum f)) with (H | H | H)
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_right.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt H]
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp
obtain ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ := Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs fun i => degree (f i)
rw [IH, hy'] at H
by_cases hx0 : f x = 0
· simp [hx0, IH]
have hy0 : f y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! H
simpa [H, degree_eq_bot] using hx0
refine absurd H (h ?_ ?_ fun H => hx ?_)
· simp [hx0]
· simp [hy, hy0]
· exact H.symm ▸ hy
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_left.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt H]
#align polynomial.degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint Polynomial.degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint
theorem natDegree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on natDegree ∘ f)) :
natDegree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => natDegree (f i) := by
by_cases H : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0
· obtain ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ := H
have hs : s.Nonempty := ⟨x, hx⟩
refine natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some ?_
rw [degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint]
· rw [← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs, ← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs,
Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.coe_sup' hs, ←
Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· simpa [hb'] using hs
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hb', Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup' (fun i : S => (natDegree (f i) : WithBot ℕ)) hb
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
simp only [Finset.le_sup'_iff, exists_prop, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx'
simpa [← Nat.cast_withBot, hb', degree_eq_bot] using hx'
exact ⟨b, hb, (degree_eq_natDegree hb').ge⟩
· exact h.imp fun x y hxy hxy' => hxy (natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq hxy')
· push_neg at H
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero H, natDegree_zero, eq_comm, show 0 = ⊥ from rfl, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
simp [H x hx]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint Polynomial.natDegree_sum_eq_of_disjoint
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem natDegree_bit0 (a : R[X]) : (bit0 a).natDegree ≤ a.natDegree :=
(natDegree_add_le _ _).trans (max_self _).le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_bit0 Polynomial.natDegree_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem natDegree_bit1 (a : R[X]) : (bit1 a).natDegree ≤ a.natDegree :=
(natDegree_add_le _ _).trans (by simp [natDegree_bit0])
#align polynomial.nat_degree_bit1 Polynomial.natDegree_bit1
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < natDegree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have A : p = C (p.coeff 0) := eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero hlt
rw [A, eval₂_C] at hz
simp only [inj (p.coeff 0) hz, RingHom.map_zero] at A
exact hp A
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pos_of_eval₂_root Polynomial.natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root
theorem degree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < degree p :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp f hz inj)
#align polynomial.degree_pos_of_eval₂_root Polynomial.degree_pos_of_eval₂_root
@[simp]
theorem coe_lt_degree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (n : WithBot ℕ) < degree p ↔ n < natDegree p := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp [h]
simp [degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.coe_lt_degree Polynomial.coe_lt_degree
@[simp]
theorem degree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
degree (map f p) = degree p ↔ f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0 ∨ p = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with h|h
· simp [h]
simp only [h, or_false]
refine ⟨fun h2 ↦ ?_, degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f⟩
have h3 : natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p := by simp_rw [natDegree, h2]
have h4 : map f p ≠ 0 := by
rwa [ne_eq, ← degree_eq_bot, h2, degree_eq_bot]
rwa [← coeff_natDegree, ← coeff_map, ← h3, coeff_natDegree, ne_eq, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Lemmas.lean | 304 | 312 | theorem natDegree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p ↔ f (p.leadingCoeff) ≠ 0 ∨ natDegree p = 0 := by |
rcases eq_or_ne (natDegree p) 0 with h|h
· simp_rw [h, ne_eq, or_true, iff_true, ← Nat.le_zero, ← h, natDegree_map_le f p]
have h2 : p ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp at h
have h3 : degree p ≠ (0 : ℕ) := degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne h
simp_rw [h, or_false, natDegree, WithBot.unbot'_eq_unbot'_iff, degree_map_eq_iff]
simp [h, h2, h3] -- simp doesn't rewrite in the hypothesis for some reason
tauto
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.OfArity
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import set_theory.zfc.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0b3759a8ef0bd8239ecdaa5e1089add5feebe1a"
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ Choice) using Lean's underlying type theory.
We do this in four main steps:
* Define pre-sets inductively.
* Define extensional equivalence on pre-sets and give it a `setoid` instance.
* Define ZFC sets by quotienting pre-sets by extensional equivalence.
* Define classes as sets of ZFC sets.
Then the rest is usual set theory.
## The model
* `PSet`: Pre-set. A pre-set is inductively defined by its indexing type and its members, which are
themselves pre-sets.
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `Class`: Class. Defined as `Set ZFSet`.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
## Other definitions
* `PSet.Type`: Underlying type of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Func`: Underlying family of pre-sets of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of pre-sets. Defined inductively.
* `PSet.omega`, `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `PSet`, as a `Set`.
* `PSet.Arity.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions. Extension of
`PSet.Equiv`.
* `PSet.Resp`: Collection of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions that respect extensional equivalence.
* `PSet.eval`: Turns a `PSet`-valued function that respect extensional equivalence into a
`ZFSet`-valued function.
* `Classical.allDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
* `Class.iota`: Definite description operator.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
## TODO
Prove `ZFSet.mapDefinableAux` computably.
-/
-- Porting note: Lean 3 uses `Set` for `ZFSet`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v
open Function (OfArity)
/-- The type of pre-sets in universe `u`. A pre-set
is a family of pre-sets indexed by a type in `Type u`.
The ZFC universe is defined as a quotient of this
to ensure extensionality. -/
inductive PSet : Type (u + 1)
| mk (α : Type u) (A : α → PSet) : PSet
#align pSet PSet
namespace PSet
/-- The underlying type of a pre-set -/
def «Type» : PSet → Type u
| ⟨α, _⟩ => α
#align pSet.type PSet.Type
/-- The underlying pre-set family of a pre-set -/
def Func : ∀ x : PSet, x.Type → PSet
| ⟨_, A⟩ => A
#align pSet.func PSet.Func
@[simp]
theorem mk_type (α A) : «Type» ⟨α, A⟩ = α :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_type PSet.mk_type
@[simp]
theorem mk_func (α A) : Func ⟨α, A⟩ = A :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_func PSet.mk_func
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ x : PSet, mk x.Type x.Func = x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.eta PSet.eta
/-- Two pre-sets are extensionally equivalent if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family and vice-versa. -/
def Equiv : PSet → PSet → Prop
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => (∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) ∧ (∀ b, ∃ a, Equiv (A a) (B b))
#align pSet.equiv PSet.Equiv
theorem equiv_iff :
∀ {x y : PSet},
Equiv x y ↔ (∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)) ∧ ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ => Iff.rfl
#align pSet.equiv_iff PSet.equiv_iff
theorem Equiv.exists_left {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).1
#align pSet.equiv.exists_left PSet.Equiv.exists_left
theorem Equiv.exists_right {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).2
#align pSet.equiv.exists_right PSet.Equiv.exists_right
@[refl]
protected theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ x, Equiv x x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩, fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.refl PSet.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Equiv.rfl {x} : Equiv x x :=
Equiv.refl x
#align pSet.equiv.rfl PSet.Equiv.rfl
protected theorem Equiv.euc : ∀ {x y z}, Equiv x y → Equiv z y → Equiv x z
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨γβ, βγ⟩ =>
⟨ fun a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.euc ab bc⟩,
fun c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.euc ba cb⟩ ⟩
#align pSet.equiv.euc PSet.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y} : Equiv x y → Equiv y x :=
(Equiv.refl y).euc
#align pSet.equiv.symm PSet.Equiv.symm
protected theorem Equiv.comm {x y} : Equiv x y ↔ Equiv y x :=
⟨Equiv.symm, Equiv.symm⟩
#align pSet.equiv.comm PSet.Equiv.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z} (h1 : Equiv x y) (h2 : Equiv y z) : Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.equiv.trans PSet.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_of_isEmpty (x y : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] [IsEmpty y.Type] : Equiv x y :=
equiv_iff.2 <| by simp
#align pSet.equiv_of_is_empty PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty
instance setoid : Setoid PSet :=
⟨PSet.Equiv, Equiv.refl, Equiv.symm, Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.setoid PSet.setoid
/-- A pre-set is a subset of another pre-set if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family. -/
protected def Subset (x y : PSet) : Prop :=
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (x.Func a) (y.Func b)
#align pSet.subset PSet.Subset
instance : HasSubset PSet :=
⟨PSet.Subset⟩
instance : IsRefl PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
instance : IsTrans PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun x y z hxy hyz a => by
cases' hxy a with b hb
cases' hyz b with c hc
exact ⟨c, hb.trans hc⟩⟩
theorem Equiv.ext : ∀ x y : PSet, Equiv x y ↔ x ⊆ y ∧ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩,
fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.ext PSet.Equiv.ext
theorem Subset.congr_left : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (x ⊆ z ↔ y ⊆ z)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun αγ b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
let ⟨c, ac⟩ := αγ a
⟨c, (Equiv.symm ba).trans ac⟩,
fun βγ a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.trans ab bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_left PSet.Subset.congr_left
theorem Subset.congr_right : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (z ⊆ x ↔ z ⊆ y)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun γα c =>
let ⟨a, ca⟩ := γα c
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ca.trans ab⟩,
fun γβ c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨a, cb.trans (Equiv.symm ab)⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_right PSet.Subset.congr_right
/-- `x ∈ y` as pre-sets if `x` is extensionally equivalent to a member of the family `y`. -/
protected def Mem (x y : PSet.{u}) : Prop :=
∃ b, Equiv x (y.Func b)
#align pSet.mem PSet.Mem
instance : Membership PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.Mem⟩
theorem Mem.mk {α : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (a : α) : A a ∈ mk α A :=
⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩
#align pSet.mem.mk PSet.Mem.mk
theorem func_mem (x : PSet) (i : x.Type) : x.Func i ∈ x := by
cases x
apply Mem.mk
#align pSet.func_mem PSet.func_mem
theorem Mem.ext : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, (∀ w : PSet.{u}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) → Equiv x y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩, h =>
⟨fun a => (h (A a)).1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (h (B b)).2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, ha.symm⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.ext PSet.Mem.ext
theorem Mem.congr_right : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ha.trans hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨a, hb.euc ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_right PSet.Mem.congr_right
theorem equiv_iff_mem {x y : PSet.{u}} : Equiv x y ↔ ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y :=
⟨Mem.congr_right,
match x, y with
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => fun h =>
⟨fun a => h.1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := h.2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, h.symm⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv_iff_mem PSet.equiv_iff_mem
theorem Mem.congr_left : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, x ∈ w ↔ y ∈ w
| _, _, h, ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.symm.trans ha⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.trans ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_left PSet.Mem.congr_left
private theorem mem_wf_aux : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → Acc (· ∈ ·) y
| ⟨α, A⟩, ⟨β, B⟩, H =>
⟨_, by
rintro ⟨γ, C⟩ ⟨b, hc⟩
cases' H.exists_right b with a ha
have H := ha.trans hc.symm
rw [mk_func] at H
exact mem_wf_aux H⟩
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨fun x => mem_wf_aux <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.mem_wf PSet.mem_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation PSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
instance : IsIrrefl PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : PSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align pSet.mem_asymm PSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : PSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align pSet.mem_irrefl PSet.mem_irrefl
/-- Convert a pre-set to a `Set` of pre-sets. -/
def toSet (u : PSet.{u}) : Set PSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align pSet.to_set PSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : PSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.mem_to_set PSet.mem_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : PSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align pSet.nonempty PSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : PSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_def PSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : PSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_of_mem PSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : PSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_to_set_iff PSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
theorem nonempty_type_iff_nonempty {x : PSet} : Nonempty x.Type ↔ PSet.Nonempty x :=
⟨fun ⟨i⟩ => ⟨_, func_mem _ i⟩, fun ⟨_, j, _⟩ => ⟨j⟩⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty PSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_type (x : PSet) [h : Nonempty x.Type] : PSet.Nonempty x :=
nonempty_type_iff_nonempty.1 h
#align pSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type PSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type
/-- Two pre-sets are equivalent iff they have the same members. -/
theorem Equiv.eq {x y : PSet} : Equiv x y ↔ toSet x = toSet y :=
equiv_iff_mem.trans Set.ext_iff.symm
#align pSet.equiv.eq PSet.Equiv.eq
instance : Coe PSet (Set PSet) :=
⟨toSet⟩
/-- The empty pre-set -/
protected def empty : PSet :=
⟨_, PEmpty.elim⟩
#align pSet.empty PSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection PSet :=
⟨PSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited PSet :=
⟨∅⟩
instance : IsEmpty («Type» ∅) :=
⟨PEmpty.elim⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x : PSet.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : PSet.{u}) :=
IsEmpty.exists_iff.1
#align pSet.not_mem_empty PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align pSet.to_set_empty PSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : PSet.{u}) : (∅ : PSet) ⊆ x := fun x => x.elim
#align pSet.empty_subset PSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬PSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [PSet.Nonempty]
#align pSet.not_nonempty_empty PSet.not_nonempty_empty
protected theorem equiv_empty (x : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] : Equiv x ∅ :=
PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty x _
#align pSet.equiv_empty PSet.equiv_empty
/-- Insert an element into a pre-set -/
protected def insert (x y : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Option y.Type, fun o => Option.casesOn o x y.Func⟩
#align pSet.insert PSet.insert
instance : Insert PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.insert⟩
instance : Singleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun s => insert s ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
instance (x y : PSet) : Inhabited (insert x y).Type :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited <| Option y.Type)
/-- The n-th von Neumann ordinal -/
def ofNat : ℕ → PSet
| 0 => ∅
| n + 1 => insert (ofNat n) (ofNat n)
#align pSet.of_nat PSet.ofNat
/-- The von Neumann ordinal ω -/
def omega : PSet :=
⟨ULift ℕ, fun n => ofNat n.down⟩
#align pSet.omega PSet.omega
/-- The pre-set separation operation `{x ∈ a | p x}` -/
protected def sep (p : PSet → Prop) (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨{ a // p (x.Func a) }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩
#align pSet.sep PSet.sep
instance : Sep PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.sep⟩
/-- The pre-set powerset operator -/
def powerset (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Set x.Type, fun p => ⟨{ a // p a }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩⟩
#align pSet.powerset PSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset : ∀ {x y : PSet}, y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => (Subset.congr_left e).2 fun ⟨a, _⟩ => ⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩, fun βα =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, Equiv (B b) (A a) }, fun b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, ba⟩, ba⟩,
fun ⟨_, b, ba⟩ => ⟨b, ba⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_powerset PSet.mem_powerset
/-- The pre-set union operator -/
def sUnion (a : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Σx, (a.Func x).Type, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (a.Func x).Func y⟩
#align pSet.sUnion PSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z
| ⟨α, A⟩, y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, c⟩, (e : Equiv y ((A a).Func c))⟩ =>
have : Func (A a) c ∈ mk (A a).Type (A a).Func := Mem.mk (A a).Func c
⟨_, Mem.mk _ _, (Mem.congr_left e).2 (by rwa [eta] at this)⟩,
fun ⟨⟨β, B⟩, ⟨a, (e : Equiv (mk β B) (A a))⟩, ⟨b, yb⟩⟩ => by
rw [← eta (A a)] at e
exact
let ⟨βt, _⟩ := e
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βt b
⟨⟨a, c⟩, yb.trans bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_sUnion PSet.mem_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : PSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align pSet.to_set_sUnion PSet.toSet_sUnion
/-- The image of a function from pre-sets to pre-sets. -/
def image (f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (x : PSet.{u}) : PSet :=
⟨x.Type, f ∘ x.Func⟩
#align pSet.image PSet.image
-- Porting note: H arguments made explicit.
theorem mem_image {f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}} (H : ∀ x y, Equiv x y → Equiv (f x) (f y)) :
∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, Equiv y (f z)
| ⟨_, A⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨A a, Mem.mk A a, ya⟩, fun ⟨_, ⟨a, za⟩, yz⟩ => ⟨a, yz.trans <| H _ _ za⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_image PSet.mem_image
/-- Universe lift operation -/
protected def Lift : PSet.{u} → PSet.{max u v}
| ⟨α, A⟩ => ⟨ULift.{v, u} α, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift (A x)⟩
#align pSet.lift PSet.Lift
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- Embedding of one universe in another -/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
def embed : PSet.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨ULift.{v, u + 1} PSet, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x⟩
#align pSet.embed PSet.embed
theorem lift_mem_embed : ∀ x : PSet.{u}, PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x ∈ embed.{u, v} := fun x =>
⟨⟨x⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align pSet.lift_mem_embed PSet.lift_mem_embed
/-- Function equivalence is defined so that `f ~ g` iff `∀ x y, x ~ y → f x ~ g y`. This extends to
equivalence of `n`-ary functions. -/
def Arity.Equiv : ∀ {n}, OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → Prop
| 0, a, b => PSet.Equiv a b
| _ + 1, a, b => ∀ x y : PSet, PSet.Equiv x y → Arity.Equiv (a x) (b y)
#align pSet.arity.equiv PSet.Arity.Equiv
theorem Arity.equiv_const {a : PSet.{u}} :
∀ n, Arity.Equiv (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n) (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n)
| 0 => Equiv.rfl
| _ + 1 => fun _ _ _ => Arity.equiv_const _
#align pSet.arity.equiv_const PSet.Arity.equiv_const
/-- `resp n` is the collection of n-ary functions on `PSet` that respect
equivalence, i.e. when the inputs are equivalent the output is as well. -/
def Resp (n) :=
{ x : OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n // Arity.Equiv x x }
#align pSet.resp PSet.Resp
instance Resp.inhabited {n} : Inhabited (Resp n) :=
⟨⟨OfArity.const _ default _, Arity.equiv_const _⟩⟩
#align pSet.resp.inhabited PSet.Resp.inhabited
/-- The `n`-ary image of a `(n + 1)`-ary function respecting equivalence as a function respecting
equivalence. -/
def Resp.f {n} (f : Resp (n + 1)) (x : PSet) : Resp n :=
⟨f.1 x, f.2 _ _ <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.resp.f PSet.Resp.f
/-- Function equivalence for functions respecting equivalence. See `PSet.Arity.Equiv`. -/
def Resp.Equiv {n} (a b : Resp n) : Prop :=
Arity.Equiv a.1 b.1
#align pSet.resp.equiv PSet.Resp.Equiv
@[refl]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.refl {n} (a : Resp n) : Resp.Equiv a a :=
a.2
#align pSet.resp.equiv.refl PSet.Resp.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.euc :
∀ {n} {a b c : Resp n}, Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv c b → Resp.Equiv a c
| 0, _, _, _, hab, hcb => PSet.Equiv.euc hab hcb
| n + 1, a, b, c, hab, hcb => fun x y h =>
@Resp.Equiv.euc n (a.f x) (b.f y) (c.f y) (hab _ _ h) (hcb _ _ <| PSet.Equiv.refl y)
#align pSet.resp.equiv.euc PSet.Resp.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.symm {n} {a b : Resp n} : Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv b a :=
(Resp.Equiv.refl b).euc
#align pSet.resp.equiv.symm PSet.Resp.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.trans {n} {x y z : Resp n} (h1 : Resp.Equiv x y)
(h2 : Resp.Equiv y z) : Resp.Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.resp.equiv.trans PSet.Resp.Equiv.trans
instance Resp.setoid {n} : Setoid (Resp n) :=
⟨Resp.Equiv, Resp.Equiv.refl, Resp.Equiv.symm, Resp.Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.resp.setoid PSet.Resp.setoid
end PSet
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
#align Set ZFSet
namespace PSet
namespace Resp
/-- Helper function for `PSet.eval`. -/
def evalAux :
∀ {n},
{ f : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n // ∀ a b : Resp n, Resp.Equiv a b → f a = f b }
| 0 => ⟨fun a => ⟦a.1⟧, fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound h⟩
| n + 1 =>
let F : Resp (n + 1) → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1) := fun a =>
@Quotient.lift _ _ PSet.setoid (fun x => evalAux.1 (a.f x)) fun _ _ h =>
evalAux.2 _ _ (a.2 _ _ h)
⟨F, fun b c h =>
funext <|
(@Quotient.ind _ _ fun q => F b q = F c q) fun z =>
evalAux.2 (Resp.f b z) (Resp.f c z) (h _ _ (PSet.Equiv.refl z))⟩
#align pSet.resp.eval_aux PSet.Resp.evalAux
/-- An equivalence-respecting function yields an n-ary ZFC set function. -/
def eval (n) : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n :=
evalAux.1
#align pSet.resp.eval PSet.Resp.eval
theorem eval_val {n f x} :
(@eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) ⟦x⟧ = eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align pSet.resp.eval_val PSet.Resp.eval_val
end Resp
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary pre-set
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class inductive Definable (n) : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n → Type (u + 1)
| mk (f) : Definable n (Resp.eval n f)
#align pSet.definable PSet.Definable
attribute [instance] Definable.mk
/-- The evaluation of a function respecting equivalence is definable, by that same function. -/
def Definable.EqMk {n} (f) :
∀ {s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n} (_ : Resp.eval _ f = s), Definable n s
| _, rfl => ⟨f⟩
#align pSet.definable.eq_mk PSet.Definable.EqMk
/-- Turns a definable function into a function that respects equivalence. -/
def Definable.Resp {n} : ∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [Definable n s], Resp n
| _, ⟨f⟩ => f
#align pSet.definable.resp PSet.Definable.Resp
theorem Definable.eq {n} :
∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [H : Definable n s], (@Definable.Resp n s H).eval _ = s
| _, ⟨_⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.definable.eq PSet.Definable.eq
end PSet
namespace Classical
open PSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allDefinable : ∀ {n} (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n), Definable n F
| 0, F =>
let p := @Quotient.exists_rep PSet _ F
@Definable.EqMk 0 ⟨choose p, Equiv.rfl⟩ _ (choose_spec p)
| n + 1, (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1)) => by
have I : (x : ZFSet) → Definable n (F x) := fun x => allDefinable (F x)
refine @Definable.EqMk (n + 1) ⟨fun x : PSet => (@Definable.Resp _ _ (I ⟦x⟧)).1, ?_⟩ _ ?_
· dsimp [Arity.Equiv]
intro x y h
rw [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]
exact (Definable.Resp (F ⟦y⟧)).2
refine funext fun q => Quotient.inductionOn q fun x => ?_
simp_rw [Resp.eval_val, Resp.f]
exact @Definable.eq _ (F ⟦x⟧) (I ⟦x⟧)
#align classical.all_definable Classical.allDefinable
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
#align Set.mk ZFSet.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
#align Set.mk_eq ZFSet.mk_eq
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
#align Set.mk_out ZFSet.mk_out
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
#align Set.eq ZFSet.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
#align Set.sound ZFSet.sound
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
#align Set.exact ZFSet.exact
@[simp]
theorem eval_mk {n f x} :
(@Resp.eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) (mk x) = Resp.eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align Set.eval_mk ZFSet.eval_mk
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PSet.Mem fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
#align Set.mem ZFSet.Mem
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mk_mem_iff ZFSet.mk_mem_iff
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align Set.to_set ZFSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mem_to_set ZFSet.mem_toSet
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
cases' hb with i h
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
#align Set.small_to_set ZFSet.small_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align Set.nonempty ZFSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_def ZFSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_of_mem ZFSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_to_set_iff ZFSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
#align Set.subset ZFSet.Subset
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
#align Set.has_subset ZFSet.hasSubset
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.subset_def ZFSet.subset_def
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
#align Set.subset_iff ZFSet.subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
#align Set.to_set_subset_iff ZFSet.toSet_subset_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
#align Set.ext ZFSet.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x = y ↔ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h], ext⟩
#align Set.ext_iff ZFSet.ext_iff
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
#align Set.to_set_injective ZFSet.toSet_injective
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.to_set_inj ZFSet.toSet_inj
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
#align Set.empty ZFSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
#align Set.not_mem_empty ZFSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align Set.to_set_empty ZFSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
#align Set.empty_subset ZFSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
#align Set.not_nonempty_empty ZFSet.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_mk_iff ZFSet.nonempty_mk_iff
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp
#align Set.eq_empty ZFSet.eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
#align Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 2
⟨PSet.insert, fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.insert ZFSet.Insert
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun x y ⟨α, A⟩ =>
show (x ∈ PSet.mk (Option α) fun o => Option.rec y A o) ↔ mk x = mk y ∨ x ∈ PSet.mk α A from
⟨fun m =>
match m with
| ⟨some a, ha⟩ => Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩
| ⟨none, h⟩ => Or.inl (Quotient.sound h),
fun m =>
match m with
| Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨some a, ha⟩
| Or.inl h => ⟨none, Quotient.exact h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_insert_iff ZFSet.mem_insert_iff
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
#align Set.mem_insert ZFSet.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
#align Set.mem_insert_of_mem ZFSet.mem_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_insert ZFSet.toSet_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Iff.trans mem_insert_iff
⟨fun o => Or.rec (fun h => h) (fun n => absurd n (not_mem_empty _)) o, Or.inl⟩
#align Set.mem_singleton ZFSet.mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_singleton ZFSet.toSet_singleton
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
#align Set.insert_nonempty ZFSet.insert_nonempty
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
#align Set.singleton_nonempty ZFSet.singleton_nonempty
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
#align Set.mem_pair ZFSet.mem_pair
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
#align Set.omega ZFSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_zero ZFSet.omega_zero
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_succ ZFSet.omega_succ
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y), fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sep ZFSet.sep
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, h⟩ => ⟨⟨a, h⟩, by rwa [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]⟩, fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩, pa⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, by
rw [mk_func] at h
rwa [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound h]⟩,
h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_sep ZFSet.mem_sep
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sep ZFSet.toSet_sep
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.powerset, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.powerset ZFSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ =>
show (⟨β, B⟩ : PSet.{u}) ∈ PSet.powerset.{u} ⟨α, A⟩ ↔ _ by simp [mem_powerset, subset_iff]
#align Set.mem_powerset ZFSet.mem_powerset
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
cases' hb with γδ δγ
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
#align Set.sUnion_lem ZFSet.sUnion_lem
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sUnion, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sUnion ZFSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
special-case `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
noncomputable def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := by
classical exact if h : x.Nonempty then ZFSet.sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z) h.some else ∅
#align Set.sInter ZFSet.sInter
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Iff.trans PSet.mem_sUnion
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion ZFSet.mem_sUnion
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
rw [sInter, dif_pos h]
simp only [mem_toSet, mem_sep, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun H => H _ h.some_mem
#align Set.mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align Set.sUnion_empty ZFSet.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := dif_neg <| by simp
#align Set.sInter_empty ZFSet.sInter_empty
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
#align Set.mem_of_mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_of_mem_sInter
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem ZFSet.mem_sUnion_of_mem
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
#align Set.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem ZFSet.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
#align Set.sUnion_singleton ZFSet.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align Set.sInter_singleton ZFSet.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sUnion ZFSet.toSet_sUnion
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
#align Set.to_set_sInter ZFSet.toSet_sInter
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
#align Set.singleton_injective ZFSet.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.singleton_inj ZFSet.singleton_inj
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
#align Set.union ZFSet.union
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
#align Set.inter ZFSet.inter
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
#align Set.diff ZFSet.diff
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
#align Set.to_set_union ZFSet.toSet_union
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_inter ZFSet.toSet_inter
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sdiff ZFSet.toSet_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
#align Set.mem_union ZFSet.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
#align Set.mem_inter ZFSet.mem_inter
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
#align Set.mem_diff ZFSet.mem_diff
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
#align Set.sUnion_pair ZFSet.sUnion_pair
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
#align Set.mem_wf ZFSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
#align Set.induction_on ZFSet.inductionOn
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
-- Porting note: this can't be inferred automatically for some reason.
instance : IsIrrefl ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align Set.mem_asymm ZFSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align Set.mem_irrefl ZFSet.mem_irrefl
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
#align Set.regularity ZFSet.regularity
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable 1 f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := @Definable.Resp 1 f _
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.image r, fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image hr).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image hr).symm⟩
#align Set.image ZFSet.image
theorem image.mk :
∀ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [H : Definable 1 f] (x) {y} (_ : y ∈ x), f y ∈ @image f H x
| _, ⟨F⟩, x, y => Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨a, F.2 _ _ ya⟩
#align Set.image.mk ZFSet.image.mk
@[simp]
theorem mem_image :
∀ {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [H : Definable 1 f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}},
y ∈ @image f H x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y
| _, ⟨_⟩, x, y =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ya⟩, fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ =>
e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
#align Set.mem_image ZFSet.mem_image
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [H : Definable 1 f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_image ZFSet.toSet_image
/-- The range of an indexed family of sets. The universes allow for a more general index type
without manual use of `ULift`. -/
noncomputable def range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) : ZFSet.{max u v} :=
⟦⟨ULift.{v} α, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ ULift.down⟩⟧
#align Set.range ZFSet.range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α : Type u} {f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}} {x : ZFSet.{max u v}} :
x ∈ range.{u, v} f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨z.down, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use ULift.up z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
#align Set.mem_range ZFSet.mem_range
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) :
(range.{u, v} f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_range ZFSet.toSet_range
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
#align Set.pair ZFSet.pair
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
#align Set.to_set_pair ZFSet.toSet_pair
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b) (powerset (powerset (x ∪ y)))
#align Set.pair_sep ZFSet.pairSep
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
#align Set.mem_pair_sep ZFSet.mem_pairSep
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := fun x x' y y' H => by
have ae := ext_iff.1 H
simp only [pair, mem_pair] at ae
obtain rfl : x = x' := by
cases' (ae {x}).1 (by simp) with h h
· exact singleton_injective h
· have m : x' ∈ ({x} : ZFSet) := by simp [h]
rw [mem_singleton.mp m]
have he : x = y → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
cases' (ae {x, y'}).2 (by simp only [eq_self_iff_true, or_true_iff]) with xy'x xy'xx
· rw [eq_comm, ← mem_singleton, ← xy'x, mem_pair]
exact Or.inr rfl
· simpa [eq_comm] using (ext_iff.1 xy'xx y').1 (by simp)
obtain xyx | xyy' := (ae {x, y}).1 (by simp)
· obtain rfl := mem_singleton.mp ((ext_iff.1 xyx y).1 <| by simp)
simp [he rfl]
· obtain rfl | yy' := mem_pair.mp ((ext_iff.1 xyy' y).1 <| by simp)
· simp [he rfl]
· simp [yy']
#align Set.pair_injective ZFSet.pair_injective
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.pair_inj ZFSet.pair_inj
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
#align Set.prod ZFSet.prod
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
#align Set.mem_prod ZFSet.mem_prod
theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by
simp
#align Set.pair_mem_prod ZFSet.pair_mem_prod
/-- `isFunc x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f` as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def IsFunc (x y f : ZFSet.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
#align Set.is_func ZFSet.IsFunc
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (IsFunc x y) (powerset (prod x y))
#align Set.funs ZFSet.funs
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,325 | 1,325 | theorem mem_funs {x y f : ZFSet.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ IsFunc x y f := by | simp [funs, IsFunc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import logic.equiv.set from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"aba57d4d3dae35460225919dcd82fe91355162f9"
/-!
# Equivalences and sets
In this file we provide lemmas linking equivalences to sets.
Some notable definitions are:
* `Equiv.ofInjective`: an injective function is (noncomputably) equivalent to its range.
* `Equiv.setCongr`: two equal sets are equivalent as types.
* `Equiv.Set.union`: a disjoint union of sets is equivalent to their `Sum`.
This file is separate from `Equiv/Basic` such that we do not require the full lattice structure
on sets before defining what an equivalence is.
-/
open Function Set
universe u v w z
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w}
namespace Equiv
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_univ {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) : range e = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall e.surjective
#align equiv.range_eq_univ Equiv.range_eq_univ
protected theorem image_eq_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e '' s = e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image_iff_of_inverse e.left_inv e.right_inv
#align equiv.image_eq_preimage Equiv.image_eq_preimage
@[simp 1001]
theorem _root_.Set.mem_image_equiv {α β} {S : Set α} {f : α ≃ β} {x : β} :
x ∈ f '' S ↔ f.symm x ∈ S :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (f.image_eq_preimage S) x
#align set.mem_image_equiv Set.mem_image_equiv
/-- Alias for `Equiv.image_eq_preimage` -/
theorem _root_.Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm {α β} (S : Set α) (f : α ≃ β) :
f '' S = f.symm ⁻¹' S :=
f.image_eq_preimage S
#align set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm
/-- Alias for `Equiv.image_eq_preimage` -/
theorem _root_.Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm {α β} (S : Set α) (f : β ≃ α) :
f ⁻¹' S = f.symm '' S :=
(f.symm.image_eq_preimage S).symm
#align set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm
-- Porting note: increased priority so this fires before `image_subset_iff`
@[simp high]
protected theorem symm_image_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
e.symm '' t ⊆ s ↔ t ⊆ e '' s := by rw [image_subset_iff, e.image_eq_preimage]
#align equiv.subset_image Equiv.symm_image_subset
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-19")] alias subset_image := Equiv.symm_image_subset
-- Porting note: increased priority so this fires before `image_subset_iff`
@[simp high]
protected theorem subset_symm_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
s ⊆ e.symm '' t ↔ e '' s ⊆ t :=
calc
s ⊆ e.symm '' t ↔ e.symm.symm '' s ⊆ t := by rw [e.symm.symm_image_subset]
_ ↔ e '' s ⊆ t := by rw [e.symm_symm]
#align equiv.subset_image' Equiv.subset_symm_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-19")] alias subset_image' := Equiv.subset_symm_image
@[simp]
theorem symm_image_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e.symm '' (e '' s) = s :=
e.leftInverse_symm.image_image s
#align equiv.symm_image_image Equiv.symm_image_image
theorem eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
t = e '' s ↔ e.symm '' t = s :=
(e.symm.injective.image_injective.eq_iff' (e.symm_image_image s)).symm
#align equiv.eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq Equiv.eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_symm_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : e '' (e.symm '' s) = s :=
e.symm.symm_image_image s
#align equiv.image_symm_image Equiv.image_symm_image
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : e '' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.surjective.image_preimage s
#align equiv.image_preimage Equiv.image_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e ⁻¹' (e '' s) = s :=
e.injective.preimage_image s
#align equiv.preimage_image Equiv.preimage_image
protected theorem image_compl {α β} (f : Equiv α β) (s : Set α) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
image_compl_eq f.bijective
#align equiv.image_compl Equiv.image_compl
@[simp]
theorem symm_preimage_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.rightInverse_symm.preimage_preimage s
#align equiv.symm_preimage_preimage Equiv.symm_preimage_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_symm_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) : e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.leftInverse_symm.preimage_preimage s
#align equiv.preimage_symm_preimage Equiv.preimage_symm_preimage
theorem preimage_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : Set β) : e ⁻¹' s ⊆ e ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
e.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
#align equiv.preimage_subset Equiv.preimage_subset
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute. `simp` can prove it.
theorem image_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : Set α) : e '' s ⊆ e '' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_image_iff e.injective
#align equiv.image_subset Equiv.image_subset
@[simp]
theorem image_eq_iff_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : Set α) : e '' s = e '' t ↔ s = t :=
image_eq_image e.injective
#align equiv.image_eq_iff_eq Equiv.image_eq_iff_eq
theorem preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t) : e ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = e '' t :=
Set.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image e.bijective
#align equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image Equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image
theorem eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t) : s = e ⁻¹' t ↔ e '' s = t :=
Set.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq e.bijective
#align equiv.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq Equiv.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq
lemma setOf_apply_symm_eq_image_setOf {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (p : α → Prop) :
{b | p (e.symm b)} = e '' {a | p a} := by
rw [Equiv.image_eq_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem prod_assoc_preimage {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u = (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align equiv.prod_assoc_preimage Equiv.prod_assoc_preimage
@[simp]
theorem prod_assoc_symm_preimage {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
(Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm ⁻¹' (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u = s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align equiv.prod_assoc_symm_preimage Equiv.prod_assoc_symm_preimage
-- `@[simp]` doesn't like these lemmas, as it uses `Set.image_congr'` to turn `Equiv.prodAssoc`
-- into a lambda expression and then unfold it.
theorem prod_assoc_image {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ '' (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u = s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u := by
simpa only [Equiv.image_eq_preimage] using prod_assoc_symm_preimage
#align equiv.prod_assoc_image Equiv.prod_assoc_image
theorem prod_assoc_symm_image {α β γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ} :
(Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm '' s ×ˢ t ×ˢ u = (s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ u := by
simpa only [Equiv.image_eq_preimage] using prod_assoc_preimage
#align equiv.prod_assoc_symm_image Equiv.prod_assoc_symm_image
/-- A set `s` in `α × β` is equivalent to the sigma-type `Σ x, {y | (x, y) ∈ s}`. -/
def setProdEquivSigma {α β : Type*} (s : Set (α × β)) :
s ≃ Σx : α, { y : β | (x, y) ∈ s } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, by simp⟩
invFun x := ⟨(x.1, x.2.1), x.2.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.set_prod_equiv_sigma Equiv.setProdEquivSigma
/-- The subtypes corresponding to equal sets are equivalent. -/
@[simps! apply]
def setCongr {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} (h : s = t) : s ≃ t :=
subtypeEquivProp h
#align equiv.set_congr Equiv.setCongr
#align equiv.set_congr_apply Equiv.setCongr_apply
-- We could construct this using `Equiv.Set.image e s e.injective`,
-- but this definition provides an explicit inverse.
/-- A set is equivalent to its image under an equivalence.
-/
@[simps]
def image {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) (s : Set α) :
s ≃ e '' s where
toFun x := ⟨e x.1, by simp⟩
invFun y :=
⟨e.symm y.1, by
rcases y with ⟨-, ⟨a, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simpa using m⟩
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv y := by simp
#align equiv.image Equiv.image
#align equiv.image_symm_apply_coe Equiv.image_symm_apply_coe
#align equiv.image_apply_coe Equiv.image_apply_coe
namespace Set
-- Porting note: Removed attribute @[simps apply symm_apply]
/-- `univ α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
protected def univ (α) : @univ α ≃ α :=
⟨Subtype.val, fun a => ⟨a, trivial⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.set.univ Equiv.Set.univ
/-- An empty set is equivalent to the `Empty` type. -/
protected def empty (α) : (∅ : Set α) ≃ Empty :=
equivEmpty _
#align equiv.set.empty Equiv.Set.empty
/-- An empty set is equivalent to a `PEmpty` type. -/
protected def pempty (α) : (∅ : Set α) ≃ PEmpty :=
equivPEmpty _
#align equiv.set.pempty Equiv.Set.pempty
/-- If sets `s` and `t` are separated by a decidable predicate, then `s ∪ t` is equivalent to
`s ⊕ t`. -/
protected def union' {α} {s t : Set α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(ht : ∀ x ∈ t, ¬p x) : (s ∪ t : Set α) ≃ s ⊕ t where
toFun x :=
if hp : p x then Sum.inl ⟨_, x.2.resolve_right fun xt => ht _ xt hp⟩
else Sum.inr ⟨_, x.2.resolve_left fun xs => hp (hs _ xs)⟩
invFun o :=
match o with
| Sum.inl x => ⟨x, Or.inl x.2⟩
| Sum.inr x => ⟨x, Or.inr x.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, h'⟩ => by by_cases h : p x <;> simp [h]
right_inv o := by
rcases o with (⟨x, h⟩ | ⟨x, h⟩) <;> [simp [hs _ h]; simp [ht _ h]]
#align equiv.set.union' Equiv.Set.union'
/-- If sets `s` and `t` are disjoint, then `s ∪ t` is equivalent to `s ⊕ t`. -/
protected def union {α} {s t : Set α} [DecidablePred fun x => x ∈ s] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) :
(s ∪ t : Set α) ≃ s ⊕ t :=
Set.union' (fun x => x ∈ s) (fun _ => id) fun _ xt xs => H ⟨xs, xt⟩
#align equiv.set.union Equiv.Set.union
theorem union_apply_left {α} {s t : Set α} [DecidablePred fun x => x ∈ s] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
{a : (s ∪ t : Set α)} (ha : ↑a ∈ s) : Equiv.Set.union H a = Sum.inl ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
dif_pos ha
#align equiv.set.union_apply_left Equiv.Set.union_apply_left
theorem union_apply_right {α} {s t : Set α} [DecidablePred fun x => x ∈ s] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
{a : (s ∪ t : Set α)} (ha : ↑a ∈ t) : Equiv.Set.union H a = Sum.inr ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
dif_neg fun h => H ⟨h, ha⟩
#align equiv.set.union_apply_right Equiv.Set.union_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem union_symm_apply_left {α} {s t : Set α} [DecidablePred fun x => x ∈ s] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
(a : s) : (Equiv.Set.union H).symm (Sum.inl a) = ⟨a, by simp⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.union_symm_apply_left Equiv.Set.union_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem union_symm_apply_right {α} {s t : Set α} [DecidablePred fun x => x ∈ s] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
(a : t) : (Equiv.Set.union H).symm (Sum.inr a) = ⟨a, by simp⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.union_symm_apply_right Equiv.Set.union_symm_apply_right
/-- A singleton set is equivalent to a `PUnit` type. -/
protected def singleton {α} (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) ≃ PUnit.{u} :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit.unit, fun _ => ⟨a, mem_singleton _⟩, fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by
simp? at h says simp only [mem_singleton_iff] at h
subst x
rfl, fun ⟨⟩ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.set.singleton Equiv.Set.singleton
/-- Equal sets are equivalent.
TODO: this is the same as `Equiv.setCongr`! -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
protected def ofEq {α : Type u} {s t : Set α} (h : s = t) : s ≃ t :=
Equiv.setCongr h
#align equiv.set.of_eq Equiv.Set.ofEq
/-- If `a ∉ s`, then `insert a s` is equivalent to `s ⊕ PUnit`. -/
protected def insert {α} {s : Set.{u} α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s : Set α) ≃ Sum s PUnit.{u + 1} :=
calc
(insert a s : Set α) ≃ ↥(s ∪ {a}) := Equiv.Set.ofEq (by simp)
_ ≃ Sum s ({a} : Set α) := Equiv.Set.union fun x ⟨hx, _⟩ => by simp_all
_ ≃ Sum s PUnit.{u + 1} := sumCongr (Equiv.refl _) (Equiv.Set.singleton _)
#align equiv.set.insert Equiv.Set.insert
@[simp]
theorem insert_symm_apply_inl {α} {s : Set.{u} α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s)
(b : s) : (Equiv.Set.insert H).symm (Sum.inl b) = ⟨b, Or.inr b.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.insert_symm_apply_inl Equiv.Set.insert_symm_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem insert_symm_apply_inr {α} {s : Set.{u} α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s)
(b : PUnit.{u + 1}) : (Equiv.Set.insert H).symm (Sum.inr b) = ⟨a, Or.inl rfl⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.insert_symm_apply_inr Equiv.Set.insert_symm_apply_inr
@[simp]
theorem insert_apply_left {α} {s : Set.{u} α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s) :
Equiv.Set.insert H ⟨a, Or.inl rfl⟩ = Sum.inr PUnit.unit :=
(Equiv.Set.insert H).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 rfl
#align equiv.set.insert_apply_left Equiv.Set.insert_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem insert_apply_right {α} {s : Set.{u} α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s) (b : s) :
Equiv.Set.insert H ⟨b, Or.inr b.2⟩ = Sum.inl b :=
(Equiv.Set.insert H).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 rfl
#align equiv.set.insert_apply_right Equiv.Set.insert_apply_right
/-- If `s : Set α` is a set with decidable membership, then `s ⊕ sᶜ` is equivalent to `α`. -/
protected def sumCompl {α} (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : Sum s (sᶜ : Set α) ≃ α :=
calc
Sum s (sᶜ : Set α) ≃ ↥(s ∪ sᶜ) := (Equiv.Set.union (by simp [Set.ext_iff])).symm
_ ≃ @univ α := Equiv.Set.ofEq (by simp)
_ ≃ α := Equiv.Set.univ _
#align equiv.set.sum_compl Equiv.Set.sumCompl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inl {α : Type u} (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (x : s) :
Equiv.Set.sumCompl s (Sum.inl x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.sum_compl_apply_inl Equiv.Set.sumCompl_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inr {α : Type u} (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (x : (sᶜ : Set α)) :
Equiv.Set.sumCompl s (Sum.inr x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.sum_compl_apply_inr Equiv.Set.sumCompl_apply_inr
theorem sumCompl_symm_apply_of_mem {α : Type u} {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ s) : (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s).symm x = Sum.inl ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
have : ((⟨x, Or.inl hx⟩ : (s ∪ sᶜ : Set α)) : α) ∈ s := hx
rw [Equiv.Set.sumCompl]
simpa using Set.union_apply_left (by simp) this
#align equiv.set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_mem Equiv.Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_of_mem
theorem sumCompl_symm_apply_of_not_mem {α : Type u} {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {x : α}
(hx : x ∉ s) : (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s).symm x = Sum.inr ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
have : ((⟨x, Or.inr hx⟩ : (s ∪ sᶜ : Set α)) : α) ∈ sᶜ := hx
rw [Equiv.Set.sumCompl]
simpa using Set.union_apply_right (by simp) this
#align equiv.set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_not_mem Equiv.Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_symm_apply {α : Type*} {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {x : s} :
(Equiv.Set.sumCompl s).symm x = Sum.inl x := by
cases' x with x hx; exact Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_of_mem hx
#align equiv.set.sum_compl_symm_apply Equiv.Set.sumCompl_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_symm_apply_compl {α : Type*} {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
{x : (sᶜ : Set α)} : (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s).symm x = Sum.inr x := by
cases' x with x hx; exact Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_of_not_mem hx
#align equiv.set.sum_compl_symm_apply_compl Equiv.Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_compl
/-- `sumDiffSubset s t` is the natural equivalence between
`s ⊕ (t \ s)` and `t`, where `s` and `t` are two sets. -/
protected def sumDiffSubset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Sum s (t \ s : Set α) ≃ t :=
calc
Sum s (t \ s : Set α) ≃ (s ∪ t \ s : Set α) :=
(Equiv.Set.union (by simp [inter_diff_self])).symm
_ ≃ t := Equiv.Set.ofEq (by simp [union_diff_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_left h])
#align equiv.set.sum_diff_subset Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset
@[simp]
theorem sumDiffSubset_apply_inl {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (x : s) :
Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset h (Sum.inl x) = inclusion h x :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.sum_diff_subset_apply_inl Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumDiffSubset_apply_inr {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(x : (t \ s : Set α)) : Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset h (Sum.inr x) = inclusion diff_subset x :=
rfl
#align equiv.set.sum_diff_subset_apply_inr Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset_apply_inr
theorem sumDiffSubset_symm_apply_of_mem {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
{x : t} (hx : x.1 ∈ s) : (Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset h).symm x = Sum.inl ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
apply (Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset h).injective
simp only [apply_symm_apply, sumDiffSubset_apply_inl]
exact Subtype.eq rfl
#align equiv.set.sum_diff_subset_symm_apply_of_mem Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset_symm_apply_of_mem
theorem sumDiffSubset_symm_apply_of_not_mem {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
{x : t} (hx : x.1 ∉ s) : (Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset h).symm x = Sum.inr ⟨x, ⟨x.2, hx⟩⟩ := by
apply (Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset h).injective
simp only [apply_symm_apply, sumDiffSubset_apply_inr]
exact Subtype.eq rfl
#align equiv.set.sum_diff_subset_symm_apply_of_not_mem Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset_symm_apply_of_not_mem
/-- If `s` is a set with decidable membership, then the sum of `s ∪ t` and `s ∩ t` is equivalent
to `s ⊕ t`. -/
protected def unionSumInter {α : Type u} (s t : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Sum (s ∪ t : Set α) (s ∩ t : Set α) ≃ Sum s t :=
calc
Sum (s ∪ t : Set α) (s ∩ t : Set α)
≃ Sum (s ∪ t \ s : Set α) (s ∩ t : Set α) := by rw [union_diff_self]
_ ≃ Sum (Sum s (t \ s : Set α)) (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
sumCongr (Set.union <| subset_empty_iff.2 (inter_diff_self _ _)) (Equiv.refl _)
_ ≃ Sum s (Sum (t \ s : Set α) (s ∩ t : Set α)) := sumAssoc _ _ _
_ ≃ Sum s (t \ s ∪ s ∩ t : Set α) :=
sumCongr (Equiv.refl _)
(by
refine (Set.union' (· ∉ s) ?_ ?_).symm
exacts [fun x hx => hx.2, fun x hx => not_not_intro hx.1])
_ ≃ Sum s t := by
{ rw [(_ : t \ s ∪ s ∩ t = t)]
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, inter_union_diff] }
#align equiv.set.union_sum_inter Equiv.Set.unionSumInter
/-- Given an equivalence `e₀` between sets `s : Set α` and `t : Set β`, the set of equivalences
`e : α ≃ β` such that `e ↑x = ↑(e₀ x)` for each `x : s` is equivalent to the set of equivalences
between `sᶜ` and `tᶜ`. -/
protected def compl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
[DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (e₀ : s ≃ t) :
{ e : α ≃ β // ∀ x : s, e x = e₀ x } ≃ ((sᶜ : Set α) ≃ (tᶜ : Set β)) where
toFun e :=
subtypeEquiv e fun a =>
not_congr <|
Iff.symm <|
MapsTo.mem_iff (mapsTo_iff_exists_map_subtype.2 ⟨e₀, e.2⟩)
(SurjOn.mapsTo_compl
(surjOn_iff_exists_map_subtype.2 ⟨t, e₀, Subset.refl t, e₀.surjective, e.2⟩)
e.1.injective)
invFun e₁ :=
Subtype.mk
(calc
α ≃ Sum s (sᶜ : Set α) := (Set.sumCompl s).symm
_ ≃ Sum t (tᶜ : Set β) := e₀.sumCongr e₁
_ ≃ β := Set.sumCompl t
)
fun x => by
simp only [Sum.map_inl, trans_apply, sumCongr_apply, Set.sumCompl_apply_inl,
Set.sumCompl_symm_apply, Trans.trans]
left_inv e := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_of_mem hx, ← e.prop ⟨x, hx⟩, Sum.map_inl, sumCongr_apply,
trans_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, Set.sumCompl_apply_inl, Trans.trans]
· simp only [Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_of_not_mem hx, Sum.map_inr, subtypeEquiv_apply,
Set.sumCompl_apply_inr, trans_apply, sumCongr_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, Trans.trans]
right_inv e :=
Equiv.ext fun x => by
simp only [Sum.map_inr, subtypeEquiv_apply, Set.sumCompl_apply_inr, Function.comp_apply,
sumCongr_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Subtype.coe_eta, Subtype.coe_mk, Trans.trans,
Set.sumCompl_symm_apply_compl]
#align equiv.set.compl Equiv.Set.compl
/-- The set product of two sets is equivalent to the type product of their coercions to types. -/
protected def prod {α β} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : ↥(s ×ˢ t) ≃ s × t :=
@subtypeProdEquivProd α β s t
#align equiv.set.prod Equiv.Set.prod
/-- The set `Set.pi Set.univ s` is equivalent to `Π a, s a`. -/
@[simps]
protected def univPi {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} (s : ∀ a, Set (β a)) :
pi univ s ≃ ∀ a, s a where
toFun f a := ⟨(f : ∀ a, β a) a, f.2 a (mem_univ a)⟩
invFun f := ⟨fun a => f a, fun a _ => (f a).2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => by
ext a
rfl
right_inv f := by
ext a
rfl
#align equiv.set.univ_pi Equiv.Set.univPi
#align equiv.set.univ_pi_symm_apply_coe Equiv.Set.univPi_symm_apply_coe
#align equiv.set.univ_pi_apply_coe Equiv.Set.univPi_apply_coe
/-- If a function `f` is injective on a set `s`, then `s` is equivalent to `f '' s`. -/
protected noncomputable def imageOfInjOn {α β} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (H : InjOn f s) :
s ≃ f '' s :=
⟨fun p => ⟨f p, mem_image_of_mem f p.2⟩, fun p =>
⟨Classical.choose p.2, (Classical.choose_spec p.2).1⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ =>
Subtype.eq
(H (Classical.choose_spec (mem_image_of_mem f h)).1 h
(Classical.choose_spec (mem_image_of_mem f h)).2),
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.eq (Classical.choose_spec h).2⟩
#align equiv.set.image_of_inj_on Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn
/-- If `f` is an injective function, then `s` is equivalent to `f '' s`. -/
@[simps! apply]
protected noncomputable def image {α β} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (H : Injective f) : s ≃ f '' s :=
Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s H.injOn
#align equiv.set.image Equiv.Set.image
#align equiv.set.image_apply Equiv.Set.image_apply
@[simp]
protected theorem image_symm_apply {α β} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (H : Injective f) (x : α)
(h : f x ∈ f '' s) : (Set.image f s H).symm ⟨f x, h⟩ = ⟨x, H.mem_set_image.1 h⟩ :=
(Equiv.symm_apply_eq _).2 rfl
#align equiv.set.image_symm_apply Equiv.Set.image_symm_apply
theorem image_symm_preimage {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (u s : Set α) :
(fun x => (Set.image f s hf).symm x : f '' s → α) ⁻¹' u = Subtype.val ⁻¹' (f '' u) := by
ext ⟨b, a, has, rfl⟩
simp [hf.eq_iff]
#align equiv.set.image_symm_preimage Equiv.Set.image_symm_preimage
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Set α` is equivalent to `Set β`. -/
@[simps]
protected def congr {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) : Set α ≃ Set β :=
⟨fun s => e '' s, fun t => e.symm '' t, symm_image_image e, symm_image_image e.symm⟩
#align equiv.set.congr Equiv.Set.congr
#align equiv.set.congr_apply Equiv.Set.congr_apply
#align equiv.set.congr_symm_apply Equiv.Set.congr_symm_apply
/-- The set `{x ∈ s | t x}` is equivalent to the set of `x : s` such that `t x`. -/
protected def sep {α : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) :
({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) ≃ { x : s | t x } :=
(Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter s t).symm
#align equiv.set.sep Equiv.Set.sep
/-- The set `𝒫 S := {x | x ⊆ S}` is equivalent to the type `Set S`. -/
protected def powerset {α} (S : Set α) :
𝒫 S ≃ Set S where
toFun := fun x : 𝒫 S => Subtype.val ⁻¹' (x : Set α)
invFun := fun x : Set S => ⟨Subtype.val '' x, by rintro _ ⟨a : S, _, rfl⟩; exact a.2⟩
left_inv x := by ext y;exact ⟨fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h, rfl⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨⟨_, x.2 h⟩, h, rfl⟩⟩
right_inv x := by ext; simp
#align equiv.set.powerset Equiv.Set.powerset
/-- If `s` is a set in `range f`,
then its image under `rangeSplitting f` is in bijection (via `f`) with `s`.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rangeSplittingImageEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Set (range f)) :
rangeSplitting f '' s ≃ s where
toFun x :=
⟨⟨f x, by simp⟩, by
rcases x with ⟨x, ⟨y, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simpa [apply_rangeSplitting f] using m⟩
invFun x := ⟨rangeSplitting f x, ⟨x, ⟨x.2, rfl⟩⟩⟩
left_inv x := by
rcases x with ⟨x, ⟨y, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp [apply_rangeSplitting f]
right_inv x := by simp [apply_rangeSplitting f]
#align equiv.set.range_splitting_image_equiv Equiv.Set.rangeSplittingImageEquiv
#align equiv.set.range_splitting_image_equiv_symm_apply_coe Equiv.Set.rangeSplittingImageEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align equiv.set.range_splitting_image_equiv_apply_coe_coe Equiv.Set.rangeSplittingImageEquiv_apply_coe_coe
/-- Equivalence between the range of `Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β` and `α`. -/
@[simps symm_apply_coe]
def rangeInl (α β : Type*) : Set.range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ≃ α where
toFun
| ⟨.inl x, _⟩ => x
| ⟨.inr _, h⟩ => False.elim <| by rcases h with ⟨x, h'⟩; cases h'
invFun x := ⟨.inl x, mem_range_self _⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ => rfl
right_inv x := rfl
@[simp] lemma rangeInl_apply_inl {α : Type*} (β : Type*) (x : α) :
(rangeInl α β) ⟨.inl x, mem_range_self _⟩ = x :=
rfl
/-- Equivalence between the range of `Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β` and `β`. -/
@[simps symm_apply_coe]
def rangeInr (α β : Type*) : Set.range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ≃ β where
toFun
| ⟨.inl _, h⟩ => False.elim <| by rcases h with ⟨x, h'⟩; cases h'
| ⟨.inr x, _⟩ => x
invFun x := ⟨.inr x, mem_range_self _⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ => rfl
right_inv x := rfl
@[simp] lemma rangeInr_apply_inr (α : Type*) {β : Type*} (x : β) :
(rangeInr α β) ⟨.inr x, mem_range_self _⟩ = x :=
rfl
end Set
/-- If `f : α → β` has a left-inverse when `α` is nonempty, then `α` is computably equivalent to the
range of `f`.
While awkward, the `Nonempty α` hypothesis on `f_inv` and `hf` allows this to be used when `α` is
empty too. This hypothesis is absent on analogous definitions on stronger `Equiv`s like
`LinearEquiv.ofLeftInverse` and `RingEquiv.ofLeftInverse` as their typeclass assumptions
are already sufficient to ensure non-emptiness. -/
@[simps]
def ofLeftInverse {α β : Sort _} (f : α → β) (f_inv : Nonempty α → β → α)
(hf : ∀ h : Nonempty α, LeftInverse (f_inv h) f) :
α ≃ range f where
toFun a := ⟨f a, a, rfl⟩
invFun b := f_inv (nonempty_of_exists b.2) b
left_inv a := hf ⟨a⟩ a
right_inv := fun ⟨b, a, ha⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| show f (f_inv ⟨a⟩ b) = b from Eq.trans (congr_arg f <| ha ▸ hf _ a) ha
#align equiv.of_left_inverse Equiv.ofLeftInverse
#align equiv.of_left_inverse_apply_coe Equiv.ofLeftInverse_apply_coe
#align equiv.of_left_inverse_symm_apply Equiv.ofLeftInverse_symm_apply
/-- If `f : α → β` has a left-inverse, then `α` is computably equivalent to the range of `f`.
Note that if `α` is empty, no such `f_inv` exists and so this definition can't be used, unlike
the stronger but less convenient `ofLeftInverse`. -/
abbrev ofLeftInverse' {α β : Sort _} (f : α → β) (f_inv : β → α) (hf : LeftInverse f_inv f) :
α ≃ range f :=
ofLeftInverse f (fun _ => f_inv) fun _ => hf
#align equiv.of_left_inverse' Equiv.ofLeftInverse'
/-- If `f : α → β` is an injective function, then domain `α` is equivalent to the range of `f`. -/
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def ofInjective {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f) : α ≃ range f :=
Equiv.ofLeftInverse f (fun _ => Function.invFun f) fun _ => Function.leftInverse_invFun hf
#align equiv.of_injective Equiv.ofInjective
#align equiv.of_injective_apply Equiv.ofInjective_apply
theorem apply_ofInjective_symm {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (b : range f) :
f ((ofInjective f hf).symm b) = b :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (ofInjective f hf).apply_symm_apply b
#align equiv.apply_of_injective_symm Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm
@[simp]
theorem ofInjective_symm_apply {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (a : α) :
(ofInjective f hf).symm ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩⟩ = a := by
apply (ofInjective f hf).injective
simp [apply_ofInjective_symm hf]
#align equiv.of_injective_symm_apply Equiv.ofInjective_symm_apply
theorem coe_ofInjective_symm {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
((ofInjective f hf).symm : range f → α) = rangeSplitting f := by
ext ⟨y, x, rfl⟩
apply hf
simp [apply_rangeSplitting f]
#align equiv.coe_of_injective_symm Equiv.coe_ofInjective_symm
@[simp]
theorem self_comp_ofInjective_symm {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
f ∘ (ofInjective f hf).symm = Subtype.val :=
funext fun x => apply_ofInjective_symm hf x
#align equiv.self_comp_of_injective_symm Equiv.self_comp_ofInjective_symm
theorem ofLeftInverse_eq_ofInjective {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (f_inv : Nonempty α → β → α)
(hf : ∀ h : Nonempty α, LeftInverse (f_inv h) f) :
ofLeftInverse f f_inv hf =
ofInjective f ((isEmpty_or_nonempty α).elim (fun h _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _)
(fun h => (hf h).injective)) := by
ext
simp
#align equiv.of_left_inverse_eq_of_injective Equiv.ofLeftInverse_eq_ofInjective
theorem ofLeftInverse'_eq_ofInjective {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (f_inv : β → α)
(hf : LeftInverse f_inv f) : ofLeftInverse' f f_inv hf = ofInjective f hf.injective := by
ext
simp
#align equiv.of_left_inverse'_eq_of_injective Equiv.ofLeftInverse'_eq_ofInjective
protected theorem set_forall_iff {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {p : Set α → Prop} :
(∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, p (e ⁻¹' a) :=
e.injective.preimage_surjective.forall
#align equiv.set_forall_iff Equiv.set_forall_iff
theorem preimage_piEquivPiSubtypeProd_symm_pi {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] (s : ∀ i, Set (β i)) :
(piEquivPiSubtypeProd p β).symm ⁻¹' pi univ s =
(pi univ fun i : { i // p i } => s i) ×ˢ pi univ fun i : { i // ¬p i } => s i := by
ext ⟨f, g⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_univ_pi, prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, Subtype.forall, ← forall_and]
refine forall_congr' fun i => ?_
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk]
by_cases hi : p i <;> simp [hi]
#align equiv.preimage_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_pi Equiv.preimage_piEquivPiSubtypeProd_symm_pi
-- See also `Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv`.
/-- `sigmaPreimageEquiv f` for `f : α → β` is the natural equivalence between
the type of all preimages of points under `f` and the total space `α`. -/
@[simps!]
def sigmaPreimageEquiv {α β} (f : α → β) : (Σb, f ⁻¹' {b}) ≃ α :=
sigmaFiberEquiv f
#align equiv.sigma_preimage_equiv Equiv.sigmaPreimageEquiv
#align equiv.sigma_preimage_equiv_symm_apply_snd_coe Equiv.sigmaPreimageEquiv_symm_apply_snd_coe
#align equiv.sigma_preimage_equiv_apply Equiv.sigmaPreimageEquiv_apply
#align equiv.sigma_preimage_equiv_symm_apply_fst Equiv.sigmaPreimageEquiv_symm_apply_fst
-- See also `Equiv.ofFiberEquiv`.
/-- A family of equivalences between preimages of points gives an equivalence between domains. -/
@[simps!]
def ofPreimageEquiv {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (e : ∀ c, f ⁻¹' {c} ≃ g ⁻¹' {c}) : α ≃ β :=
Equiv.ofFiberEquiv e
#align equiv.of_preimage_equiv Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv
#align equiv.of_preimage_equiv_apply Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv_apply
#align equiv.of_preimage_equiv_symm_apply Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv_symm_apply
theorem ofPreimageEquiv_map {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (e : ∀ c, f ⁻¹' {c} ≃ g ⁻¹' {c})
(a : α) : g (ofPreimageEquiv e a) = f a :=
Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_map e a
#align equiv.of_preimage_equiv_map Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv_map
end Equiv
/-- If a function is a bijection between two sets `s` and `t`, then it induces an
equivalence between the types `↥s` and `↥t`. -/
noncomputable def Set.BijOn.equiv {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (f : α → β)
(h : BijOn f s t) : s ≃ t :=
Equiv.ofBijective _ h.bijective
#align set.bij_on.equiv Set.BijOn.equiv
/-- The composition of an updated function with an equiv on a subtype can be expressed as an
updated function. -/
-- Porting note: replace `s : Set α` and `: s` with `p : α → Prop` and `: Subtype p`, since the
-- former now unfolds syntactically to a less general case of the latter.
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Set.lean | 711 | 728 | theorem dite_comp_equiv_update {α : Type*} {β : Sort*} {γ : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
(e : β ≃ Subtype p)
(v : β → γ) (w : α → γ) (j : β) (x : γ) [DecidableEq β] [DecidableEq α]
[∀ j, Decidable (p j)] :
(fun i : α => if h : p i then (Function.update v j x) (e.symm ⟨i, h⟩) else w i) =
Function.update (fun i : α => if h : p i then v (e.symm ⟨i, h⟩) else w i) (e j) x := by |
ext i
by_cases h : p i
· rw [dif_pos h, Function.update_apply_equiv_apply, Equiv.symm_symm,
Function.update_apply, Function.update_apply, dif_pos h]
have h_coe : (⟨i, h⟩ : Subtype p) = e j ↔ i = e j :=
Subtype.ext_iff.trans (by rw [Subtype.coe_mk])
simp [h_coe]
· have : i ≠ e j := by
contrapose! h
have : p (e j : α) := (e j).2
rwa [← h] at this
simp [h, this]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
#align_import algebra.big_operators.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Big operators
In this file we define products and sums indexed by finite sets (specifically, `Finset`).
## Notation
We introduce the following notation.
Let `s` be a `Finset α`, and `f : α → β` a function.
* `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f` (assuming `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f` (assuming `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
* `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
## Implementation Notes
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists AddCommMonoidWithOne
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
variable {ι κ α β γ : Type*}
open Fin Function
namespace Finset
/-- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is the product of `f x`
as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`.
-/
@[to_additive "`∑ x ∈ s, f x` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : β :=
(s.1.map f).prod
#align finset.prod Finset.prod
#align finset.sum Finset.sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (hs : s.Nodup) (f : α → β) :
(⟨s, hs⟩ : Finset α).prod f = (s.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_mk Finset.prod_mk
#align finset.sum_mk Finset.sum_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_val [CommMonoid α] (s : Finset α) : s.1.prod = s.prod id := by
rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_val Finset.prod_val
#align finset.sum_val Finset.sum_val
end Finset
library_note "operator precedence of big operators"/--
There is no established mathematical convention
for the operator precedence of big operators like `∏` and `∑`.
We will have to make a choice.
Online discussions, such as https://math.stackexchange.com/q/185538/30839
seem to suggest that `∏` and `∑` should have the same precedence,
and that this should be somewhere between `*` and `+`.
The latter have precedence levels `70` and `65` respectively,
and we therefore choose the level `67`.
In practice, this means that parentheses should be placed as follows:
```lean
∑ k ∈ K, (a k + b k) = ∑ k ∈ K, a k + ∑ k ∈ K, b k →
∏ k ∈ K, a k * b k = (∏ k ∈ K, a k) * (∏ k ∈ K, b k)
```
(Example taken from page 490 of Knuth's *Concrete Mathematics*.)
-/
namespace BigOperators
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder Lean Meta
-- TODO: contribute this modification back to `extBinder`
/-- A `bigOpBinder` is like an `extBinder` and has the form `x`, `x : ty`, or `x pred`
where `pred` is a `binderPred` like `< 2`.
Unlike `extBinder`, `x` is a term. -/
syntax bigOpBinder := term:max ((" : " term) <|> binderPred)?
/-- A BigOperator binder in parentheses -/
syntax bigOpBinderParenthesized := " (" bigOpBinder ")"
/-- A list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinderCollection := bigOpBinderParenthesized+
/-- A single (unparenthesized) binder, or a list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinders := bigOpBinderCollection <|> (ppSpace bigOpBinder)
/-- Collects additional binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinder`.
Note: this is not extensible at the moment, unlike the usual `bigOpBinder` expansions. -/
def processBigOpBinder (processed : (Array (Term × Term)))
(binder : TSyntax ``bigOpBinder) : MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
set_option hygiene false in
withRef binder do
match binder with
| `(bigOpBinder| $x:term) =>
match x with
| `(($a + $b = $n)) => -- Maybe this is too cute.
return processed |>.push (← `(⟨$a, $b⟩), ← `(Finset.Nat.antidiagonal $n))
| _ => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``(Finset.univ))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x : $t) => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``((Finset.univ : Finset $t)))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ∈ $s) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(finset% $s))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x < $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iio $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≤ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iic $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x > $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ioi $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≥ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ici $n))
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collects the binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinders`. -/
def processBigOpBinders (binders : TSyntax ``bigOpBinders) :
MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
match binders with
| `(bigOpBinders| $b:bigOpBinder) => processBigOpBinder #[] b
| `(bigOpBinders| $[($bs:bigOpBinder)]*) => bs.foldlM processBigOpBinder #[]
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collect the binderIdents into a `⟨...⟩` expression. -/
def bigOpBindersPattern (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
let ts := processed.map Prod.fst
if ts.size == 1 then
return ts[0]!
else
`(⟨$ts,*⟩)
/-- Collect the terms into a product of sets. -/
def bigOpBindersProd (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
if processed.isEmpty then
`((Finset.univ : Finset Unit))
else if processed.size == 1 then
return processed[0]!.2
else
processed.foldrM (fun s p => `(SProd.sprod $(s.2) $p)) processed.back.2
(start := processed.size - 1)
/--
- `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∑ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∑ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.sum (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∑ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∑" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigsum) "∑ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
/--
- `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∏ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∏ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.prod (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∏ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∏" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigprod) "∏ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsum)
| `(∑ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.sum (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.sum $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
macro_rules (kind := bigprod)
| `(∏ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.prod (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.prod $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
/-- (Deprecated, use `∑ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∑ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigsumin) "∑ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsumin)
| `(∑ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∑ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
/-- (Deprecated, use `∏ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∏ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigprodin) "∏ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigprodin)
| `(∏ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∏ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
open Lean Meta Parser.Term PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.prod`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the product is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.prod] def delabFinsetProd : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∏ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∏ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.sum`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the sum is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.sum] def delabFinsetSum : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∑ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∑ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
end BigOperators
namespace Finset
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_multiset_prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = (s.1.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod
#align finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_map_val [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.1.map f).prod = ∏ a ∈ s, f a :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_map_val Finset.prod_map_val
#align finset.sum_map_val Finset.sum_map_val
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = s.fold ((· * ·) : β → β → β) 1 f :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_fold Finset.prod_eq_fold
#align finset.sum_eq_fold Finset.sum_eq_fold
@[simp]
theorem sum_multiset_singleton (s : Finset α) : (s.sum fun x => {x}) = s.val := by
simp only [sum_eq_multiset_sum, Multiset.sum_map_singleton]
#align finset.sum_multiset_singleton Finset.sum_multiset_singleton
end Finset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_prod [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {G : Type*} [FunLike G β γ] [MonoidHomClass G β γ]
(g : G) (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : g (∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g (f x) := by
simp only [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, map_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align map_prod map_prod
#align map_sum map_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, ⇑(f x) :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.coeFn β γ) _ _
#align monoid_hom.coe_finset_prod MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_finset_sum AddMonoidHom.coe_finset_sum
/-- See also `Finset.prod_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"See also `Finset.sum_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ`"]
theorem MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α)
(b : β) : (∏ x ∈ s, f x) b = ∏ x ∈ s, f x b :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.eval b) _ _
#align monoid_hom.finset_prod_apply MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.finset_sum_apply AddMonoidHom.finset_sum_apply
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_empty : ∏ x ∈ ∅, f x = 1 :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_empty Finset.prod_empty
#align finset.sum_empty Finset.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_of_empty Finset.prod_of_empty
#align finset.sum_of_empty Finset.sum_of_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (h : a ∉ s) : ∏ x ∈ cons a s h, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.prod_cons Finset.prod_cons
#align finset.sum_cons Finset.sum_cons
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_insert [DecidableEq α] : a ∉ s → ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_insert
#align finset.prod_insert Finset.prod_insert
#align finset.sum_insert Finset.sum_insert
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
by_cases hm : a ∈ s
· simp_rw [insert_eq_of_mem hm]
· rw [prod_insert hm, h hm, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem Finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem
#align finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_one [DecidableEq α] (h : f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
#align finset.prod_insert_one Finset.prod_insert_one
#align finset.sum_insert_zero Finset.sum_insert_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_insert_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) {f : α → M} :
(∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x) / f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ∏ x ∈ singleton a, f x = f a :=
Eq.trans fold_singleton <| mul_one _
#align finset.prod_singleton Finset.prod_singleton
#align finset.sum_singleton Finset.sum_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pair [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
(∏ x ∈ ({a, b} : Finset α), f x) = f a * f b := by
rw [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_pair Finset.prod_pair
#align finset.sum_pair Finset.sum_pair
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const_one : (∏ _x ∈ s, (1 : β)) = 1 := by
simp only [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_const', Multiset.prod_replicate, one_pow]
#align finset.prod_const_one Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.sum_const_zero Finset.sum_const_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_image [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, g x = g y → x = y) → ∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (g x) :=
fold_image
#align finset.prod_image Finset.prod_image
#align finset.sum_image Finset.sum_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map (s : Finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.map e, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (e x) := by
rw [Finset.prod, Finset.map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_map Finset.prod_map
#align finset.sum_map Finset.sum_map
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s.attach, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
classical rw [← prod_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn, attach_image_val]
#align finset.prod_attach Finset.prod_attach
#align finset.sum_attach Finset.sum_attach
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀ x ∈ s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g := by
rw [h]; exact fold_congr
#align finset.prod_congr Finset.prod_congr
#align finset.sum_congr Finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ _x ∈ s, 1 := Finset.prod_congr rfl h
_ = 1 := Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_one Finset.prod_eq_one
#align finset.sum_eq_zero Finset.sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjUnion (h) :
∏ x ∈ s₁.disjUnion s₂ h, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjUnion h)
rw [one_mul]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_union Finset.prod_disjUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_union Finset.sum_disjUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjiUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Finset α) (h) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjiUnion t h, f x = ∏ i ∈ s, ∏ x ∈ t i, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjiUnion h)
dsimp [Finset.prod, Multiset.prod, Multiset.fold, Finset.disjUnion, Finset.fold]
congr
exact prod_const_one.symm
#align finset.prod_disj_Union Finset.prod_disjiUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_Union Finset.sum_disjiUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union_inter [DecidableEq α] :
(∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
fold_union_inter
#align finset.prod_union_inter Finset.prod_union_inter
#align finset.sum_union_inter Finset.sum_union_inter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union [DecidableEq α] (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h]; exact (mul_one _).symm
#align finset.prod_union Finset.prod_union
#align finset.sum_union Finset.sum_union
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
(s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
have := Classical.decEq α
rw [← prod_union (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s s p), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
#align finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not Finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not
section ToList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_to_list (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.toList.map f).prod = s.prod f := by
rw [Finset.prod, ← Multiset.prod_coe, ← Multiset.map_coe, Finset.coe_toList]
#align finset.prod_to_list Finset.prod_to_list
#align finset.sum_to_list Finset.sum_to_list
end ToList
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (prod_map s σ.toEmbedding f).symm
exact (map_perm hs).symm
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp Equiv.Perm.prod_comp
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp Equiv.Perm.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp' (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x) x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x (σ.symm x) := by
convert σ.prod_comp s (fun x => f x (σ.symm x)) hs
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp' Equiv.Perm.prod_comp'
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp' Equiv.Perm.sum_comp'
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (insert a s).powerset, f t =
(∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) * ∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f (insert a t) := by
rw [powerset_insert, prod_union, prod_image]
· exact insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn.mono fun t ht ↦ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 ht) ha
· aesop (add simp [disjoint_left, insert_subset_iff])
#align finset.prod_powerset_insert Finset.prod_powerset_insert
#align finset.sum_powerset_insert Finset.sum_powerset_insert
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_cons (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (s.cons a ha).powerset, f t = (∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) *
∏ t ∈ s.powerset.attach, f (cons a t $ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 t.2) ha) := by
classical
simp_rw [cons_eq_insert]
rw [prod_powerset_insert ha, prod_attach _ fun t ↦ f (insert a t)]
/-- A product over `powerset s` is equal to the double product over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over `powerset s` is equal to the double sum over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`"]
lemma prod_powerset (s : Finset α) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ powerset s, f t = ∏ j ∈ range (card s + 1), ∏ t ∈ powersetCard j s, f t := by
rw [powerset_card_disjiUnion, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_powerset Finset.prod_powerset
#align finset.sum_powerset Finset.sum_powerset
end CommMonoid
end Finset
section
open Finset
variable [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompl.prod_mul_prod {s t : Finset α} (h : IsCompl s t) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ t, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(Finset.prod_disjUnion h.disjoint).symm.trans <| by
classical rw [Finset.disjUnion_eq_union, ← Finset.sup_eq_union, h.sup_eq_top]; rfl
#align is_compl.prod_mul_prod IsCompl.prod_mul_prod
#align is_compl.sum_add_sum IsCompl.sum_add_sum
end
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
/-- Multiplying the products of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole product.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype`. -/
@[to_additive "Adding the sums of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole sum.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype`. "]
theorem prod_mul_prod_compl [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
IsCompl.prod_mul_prod isCompl_compl f
#align finset.prod_mul_prod_compl Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl
#align finset.sum_add_sum_compl Finset.sum_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_compl_mul_prod [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i) * ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(@isCompl_compl _ s _).symm.prod_mul_prod f
#align finset.prod_compl_mul_prod Finset.prod_compl_mul_prod
#align finset.sum_compl_add_sum Finset.sum_compl_add_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset_one_on_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, g x = 1)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f x = g x) : ∏ i ∈ s₁, f i = ∏ i ∈ s₂, g i := by
rw [← prod_sdiff h, prod_eq_one hg, one_mul]
exact prod_congr rfl hfg
#align finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
#align finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
prod_subset_one_on_sdiff h (by simpa) fun _ _ => rfl
#align finset.prod_subset Finset.prod_subset
#align finset.sum_subset Finset.sum_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_disj_sum (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : Sum α γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f (Sum.inl x)) * ∏ x ∈ t, f (Sum.inr x) := by
rw [← map_inl_disjUnion_map_inr, prod_disjUnion, prod_map, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_sum Finset.prod_disj_sum
#align finset.sum_disj_sum Finset.sum_disj_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sum_elim (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, Sum.elim f g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by simp
#align finset.prod_sum_elim Finset.prod_sum_elim
#align finset.sum_sum_elim Finset.sum_sum_elim
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_biUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α}
(hs : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) : ∏ x ∈ s.biUnion t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ i ∈ t x, f i := by
rw [← disjiUnion_eq_biUnion _ _ hs, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_bUnion Finset.prod_biUnion
#align finset.sum_bUnion Finset.sum_biUnion
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the product of fiberwise products. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.prod_sigma'`. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the sum of fiberwise sums. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.sum_sigma'`"]
theorem prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : Sigma σ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x = ∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f ⟨a, s⟩ := by
simp_rw [← disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk, prod_disjiUnion, prod_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
#align finset.prod_sigma Finset.prod_sigma
#align finset.sum_sigma Finset.sum_sigma
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sigma' {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : ∀ a, σ a → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f a s) = ∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x.1 x.2 :=
Eq.symm <| prod_sigma s t fun x => f x.1 x.2
#align finset.prod_sigma' Finset.prod_sigma'
#align finset.sum_sigma' Finset.sum_sigma'
section bij
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α}
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the product, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the sum, rather than being a non-dependent function."]
theorem prod_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
congr_arg Multiset.prod (Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi i_inj i_surj h)
#align finset.prod_bij Finset.prod_bij
#align finset.sum_bij Finset.sum_bij
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the products, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather than
as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the sums, rather than being non-dependent functions."]
theorem prod_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, ι) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
refine prod_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩) h
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
#align finset.prod_bij' Finset.prod_bij'
#align finset.sum_bij' Finset.sum_bij'
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the sum."]
lemma prod_nbij (i : ι → κ) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set ι).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set ι).SurjOn i t) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj) h
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the products.
The difference with `Finset.prod_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the products, rather than on the entire types.
-/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the sums.
The difference with `Finset.sum_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the sums, rather than on the entire types."]
lemma prod_nbij' (i : ι → κ) (j : κ → ι) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv h
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := by refine prod_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hfg <;> simp [hst]
#align finset.equiv.prod_comp_finset Finset.prod_equiv
#align finset.equiv.sum_comp_finset Finset.sum_equiv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t)
(hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst hfg
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injOn (e : ι → κ) (he : Set.InjOn e s) (hest : Set.MapsTo e s t)
(h' : ∀ i ∈ t, i ∉ e '' s → g i = 1) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ j ∈ t, g j := by
classical
exact (prod_nbij e (fun a ↦ mem_image_of_mem e) he (by simp [Set.surjOn_image]) h).trans <|
prod_subset (image_subset_iff.2 hest) <| by simpa using h'
variable [DecidableEq κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f (g i) :=
prod_congr rfl fun j _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hi).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to h]
#align finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to
#align finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x ↦ g x = y, f (g x) :=
prod_congr rfl fun y _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hx).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to h _
variable [Fintype κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
#align finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.prod_fiberwise
#align finset.sum_fiberwise Finset.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
end bij
/-- Taking a product over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the product over `Fintype.piFinset t`.
`univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`, but differ
in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the sum over
`Fintype.piFinset t`. `univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`,
but differ in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`."]
lemma prod_univ_pi [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {κ : ι → Type*} (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i))
(f : (∀ i ∈ (univ : Finset ι), κ i) → β) :
∏ x ∈ univ.pi t, f x = ∏ x ∈ Fintype.piFinset t, f fun a _ ↦ x a := by
apply prod_nbij' (fun x i ↦ x i $ mem_univ _) (fun x i _ ↦ x i) <;> simp
#align finset.prod_univ_pi Finset.prod_univ_pi
#align finset.sum_univ_pi Finset.sum_univ_pi
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_diag [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α × α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s.diag, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f (i, i) := by
apply prod_nbij' Prod.fst (fun i ↦ (i, i)) <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (c, a) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.1, p.2))
apply prod_equiv (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product Finset.prod_finset_product
#align finset.sum_finset_product Finset.sum_finset_product
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product' (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f c a :=
prod_finset_product r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product' Finset.prod_finset_product'
#align finset.sum_finset_product' Finset.sum_finset_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α × γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (a, c) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.2, p.1))
apply prod_equiv ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm) <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right Finset.prod_finset_product_right
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right Finset.sum_finset_product_right
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right' (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α → γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f a c :=
prod_finset_product_right r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right' Finset.prod_finset_product_right'
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right' Finset.sum_finset_product_right'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_image' [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀ c ∈ s, f (g c) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = g c, h x) :
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, h x :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.image g, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = x, h x :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _x hx =>
let ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩ := mem_image.1 hx
hc ▸ eq c hcs
_ = ∏ x ∈ s, h x := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _x => mem_image_of_mem g) _
#align finset.prod_image' Finset.prod_image'
#align finset.sum_image' Finset.sum_image'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mul_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x * g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]; rfl) fold_op_distrib
#align finset.prod_mul_distrib Finset.prod_mul_distrib
#align finset.sum_add_distrib Finset.sum_add_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_comm (f g h i : α → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, f a * g a) * ∏ a ∈ s, h a * i a = (∏ a ∈ s, f a * h a) * ∏ a ∈ s, g a * i a := by
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_mul_mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product (s ×ˢ t) s (fun _a => t) fun _p => mem_product
#align finset.prod_product Finset.prod_product
#align finset.sum_product Finset.sum_product
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product`"]
theorem prod_product' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y :=
prod_product
#align finset.prod_product' Finset.prod_product'
#align finset.sum_product' Finset.sum_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product_right {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product_right (s ×ˢ t) t (fun _a => s) fun _p => mem_product.trans and_comm
#align finset.prod_product_right Finset.prod_product_right
#align finset.sum_product_right Finset.sum_product_right
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product_right`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product_right`"]
theorem prod_product_right' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_product_right
#align finset.prod_product_right' Finset.prod_product_right'
#align finset.sum_product_right' Finset.sum_product_right'
/-- Generalization of `Finset.prod_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on the outer
variable. -/
@[to_additive "Generalization of `Finset.sum_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on
the outer variable."]
theorem prod_comm' {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α} {t' : Finset α} {s' : α → Finset γ}
(h : ∀ x y, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t x ↔ x ∈ s' y ∧ y ∈ t') {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t x, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t', ∏ x ∈ s' y, f x y := by
classical
have : ∀ z : γ × α, (z ∈ s.biUnion fun x => (t x).map <| Function.Embedding.sectr x _) ↔
z.1 ∈ s ∧ z.2 ∈ t z.1 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_map, Function.Embedding.sectr_apply, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right, ← and_assoc]
exact
(prod_finset_product' _ _ _ this).symm.trans
((prod_finset_product_right' _ _ _) fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (this _).trans ((h x y).trans and_comm))
#align finset.prod_comm' Finset.prod_comm'
#align finset.sum_comm' Finset.sum_comm'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_comm {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_comm' fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align finset.prod_comm Finset.prod_comm
#align finset.sum_comm Finset.sum_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel [CommMonoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀ a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (∏ x ∈ s, f x) (∏ x ∈ s, g x) := by
delta Finset.prod
apply Multiset.prod_hom_rel <;> assumption
#align finset.prod_hom_rel Finset.prod_hom_rel
#align finset.sum_hom_rel Finset.sum_hom_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_of_ne {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
(prod_subset (filter_subset _ _)) fun x => by
classical
rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter]
exact fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨h₁, by simpa using hp _ h₁ h₂⟩
#align finset.prod_filter_of_ne Finset.prod_filter_of_ne
#align finset.sum_filter_of_ne Finset.sum_filter_of_ne
-- If we use `[DecidableEq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `Decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_ne_one (s : Finset α) [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)] :
∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_filter_of_ne fun _ _ => id
#align finset.prod_filter_ne_one Finset.prod_filter_ne_one
#align finset.sum_filter_ne_zero Finset.sum_filter_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α → β) :
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 :=
calc
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s.filter p, if p a then f a else 1 :=
prod_congr rfl fun a h => by rw [if_pos]; simpa using (mem_filter.1 h).2
_ = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 := by
{ refine prod_subset (filter_subset _ s) fun x hs h => ?_
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h
exact if_neg (by simpa using h hs) }
#align finset.prod_filter Finset.prod_filter
#align finset.sum_filter Finset.sum_filter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h : a ∈ s)
(h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ {a}, f x := by
{ refine (prod_subset ?_ ?_).symm
· intro _ H
rwa [mem_singleton.1 H]
· simpa only [mem_singleton] }
_ = f a := prod_singleton _ _
#align finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1)
(h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
by_cases (prod_eq_single_of_mem a · h₀) fun this =>
(prod_congr rfl fun b hb => h₀ b hb <| by rintro rfl; exact this hb).trans <|
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm
#align finset.prod_eq_single Finset.prod_eq_single
#align finset.sum_eq_single Finset.sum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_left [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₂, a ∉ s₁ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₁, f a :=
Eq.symm <|
prod_subset subset_union_left fun _a ha ha' ↦ hs _ ((mem_union.1 ha).resolve_left ha') ha'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_right [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₁, a ∉ s₂ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₂, f a := by rw [union_comm, prod_union_eq_left hs]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s)
(hn : a ≠ b) (h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; let s' := ({a, b} : Finset α)
have hu : s' ⊆ s := by
refine insert_subset_iff.mpr ?_
apply And.intro ha
apply singleton_subset_iff.mpr hb
have hf : ∀ c ∈ s, c ∉ s' → f c = 1 := by
intro c hc hcs
apply h₀ c hc
apply not_or.mp
intro hab
apply hcs
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
exact hab
rw [← prod_subset hu hf]
exact Finset.prod_pair hn
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (hn : a ≠ b)
(h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) (ha : a ∉ s → f a = 1) (hb : b ∉ s → f b = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; by_cases h₁ : a ∈ s <;> by_cases h₂ : b ∈ s
· exact prod_eq_mul_of_mem a b h₁ h₂ hn h₀
· rw [hb h₂, mul_one]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem a h₁
exact fun c hc hca => h₀ c hc ⟨hca, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩
· rw [ha h₁, one_mul]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem b h₂
exact fun c hc hcb => h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, hcb⟩
· rw [ha h₁, hb h₂, mul_one]
exact
_root_.trans
(prod_congr rfl fun c hc =>
h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩)
prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_mul Finset.prod_eq_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_add Finset.sum_eq_add
-- Porting note: simpNF linter complains that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
/-- A product over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)
"A sum over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`."]
theorem prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x := by
conv_lhs => erw [← prod_map (s.subtype p) (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f]
exact prod_congr (subtype_map _) fun x _hx => rfl
#align finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter
/-- If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a product
over `s.subtype p` equals that product over `s`. -/
@[to_additive "If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a sum
over `s.subtype p` equals that sum over `s`."]
theorem prod_subtype_of_mem (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter, filter_true_of_mem]
simpa using h
#align finset.prod_subtype_of_mem Finset.prod_subtype_of_mem
#align finset.sum_subtype_of_mem Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem
/-- A product of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
product in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
sum in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`."]
theorem prod_subtype_map_embedding {p : α → Prop} {s : Finset { x // p x }} {f : { x // p x } → β}
{g : α → β} (h : ∀ x : { x // p x }, x ∈ s → g x = f x) :
(∏ x ∈ s.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [Finset.prod_map]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h
#align finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding Finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding
#align finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding
variable (f s)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort_eq_attach (f : s → β) : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.attach, f i :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach
#align finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := prod_attach _ _
#align finset.prod_coe_sort Finset.prod_coe_sort
#align finset.sum_coe_sort Finset.sum_coe_sort
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_coe (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (∏ i : (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_coe_sort s f
#align finset.prod_finset_coe Finset.prod_finset_coe
#align finset.sum_finset_coe Finset.sum_finset_coe
variable {f s}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype {p : α → Prop} {F : Fintype (Subtype p)} (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
(f : α → β) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a : Subtype p, f a := by
have : (· ∈ s) = p := Set.ext h
subst p
rw [← prod_coe_sort]
congr!
#align finset.prod_subtype Finset.prod_subtype
#align finset.sum_subtype Finset.sum_subtype
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage' (f : ι → κ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)] (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter (· ∈ Set.range f), g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ preimage s f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ image f (preimage s f hf), g x :=
Eq.symm <| prod_image <| by simpa only [mem_preimage, Set.InjOn] using hf
_ = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => x ∈ Set.range f, g x := by rw [image_preimage]
#align finset.prod_preimage' Finset.prod_preimage'
#align finset.sum_preimage' Finset.sum_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∉ Set.range f → g x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
classical rw [prod_preimage', prod_filter_of_ne]; exact fun x hx ↦ Not.imp_symm (hg x hx)
#align finset.prod_preimage Finset.prod_preimage
#align finset.sum_preimage Finset.sum_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage_of_bij (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf.injOn, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
prod_preimage _ _ hf.injOn g fun _ hs h_f ↦ (h_f <| hf.subset_range hs).elim
#align finset.prod_preimage_of_bij Finset.prod_preimage_of_bij
#align finset.sum_preimage_of_bij Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set_coe (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : (∏ i : s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
(Finset.prod_subtype s.toFinset (fun _ ↦ Set.mem_toFinset) f).symm
/-- The product of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the product of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 1` off `s`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the sum of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 0` off `s`."]
theorem prod_congr_set {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {β : Type*} [Fintype β] (s : Set β)
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f : β → α) (g : s → α) (w : ∀ (x : β) (h : x ∈ s), f x = g ⟨x, h⟩)
(w' : ∀ x : β, x ∉ s → f x = 1) : Finset.univ.prod f = Finset.univ.prod g := by
rw [← @Finset.prod_subset _ _ s.toFinset Finset.univ f _ (by simp)]
· rw [Finset.prod_subtype]
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
exact fun ⟨x, h⟩ _ => w x h
· simp
· rintro x _ h
exact w' x (by simpa using h)
#align finset.prod_congr_set Finset.prod_congr_set
#align finset.sum_congr_set Finset.sum_congr_set
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p}
[DecidablePred fun x => ¬p x] (f : ∀ x : α, p x → γ) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
calc
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) *
∏ x ∈ s.filter (¬p ·), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) :=
(prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s p _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ _).symm (prod_attach _ _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_congr rfl fun x _hx ↦
congr_arg h (dif_pos <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
(prod_congr rfl fun x _hx => congr_arg h (dif_neg <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
#align finset.prod_apply_dite Finset.prod_apply_dite
#align finset.sum_apply_dite Finset.sum_apply_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {_hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ)
(h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (f x)) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, h (g x) :=
(prod_apply_dite _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ (h ∘ f)) (prod_attach _ (h ∘ g))
#align finset.prod_apply_ite Finset.prod_apply_ite
#align finset.sum_apply_ite Finset.sum_apply_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f : ∀ x : α, p x → β)
(g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, f x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, g x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) := by
simp [prod_apply_dite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_dite Finset.prod_dite
#align finset.sum_dite Finset.sum_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, g x := by
simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_ite Finset.prod_ite
#align finset.sum_ite Finset.sum_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
rw [prod_ite, filter_false_of_mem, filter_true_of_mem]
· simp only [prod_empty, one_mul]
all_goals intros; apply h; assumption
#align finset.prod_ite_of_false Finset.prod_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_ite_of_false Finset.sum_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
simp_rw [← ite_not (p _)]
apply prod_ite_of_false
simpa
#align finset.prod_ite_of_true Finset.prod_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_ite_of_true Finset.sum_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (g x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_false _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (f x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_true _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_extend_by_one [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ s then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _i hi => if_pos hi
#align finset.prod_extend_by_one Finset.prod_extend_by_one
#align finset.sum_extend_by_zero Finset.sum_extend_by_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_mem [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ t then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← Finset.prod_filter, Finset.filter_mem_eq_inter]
#align finset.prod_ite_mem Finset.prod_ite_mem
#align finset.sum_ite_mem Finset.sum_ite_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, a = x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : a = x then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h.symm
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq Finset.prod_dite_eq
#align finset.sum_dite_eq Finset.sum_dite_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, x = a → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : x = a then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq' Finset.prod_dite_eq'
#align finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.sum_dite_eq'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (a = x) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq Finset.prod_ite_eq
#align finset.sum_ite_eq Finset.sum_ite_eq
/-- A product taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality test on the index and whose
alternative is `1` has value either the term at that index or `1`.
The difference with `Finset.prod_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "A sum taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality
test on the index and whose alternative is `0` has value either the term at that index or `0`.
The difference with `Finset.sum_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped."]
theorem prod_ite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (x = a) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq' Finset.prod_ite_eq'
#align finset.sum_ite_eq' Finset.sum_ite_eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_index (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ if p then s else t, f x = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ t, f x :=
apply_ite (fun s => ∏ x ∈ s, f x) _ _ _
#align finset.prod_ite_index Finset.prod_ite_index
#align finset.sum_ite_index Finset.sum_ite_index
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p then f x else g x) = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_ite_irrel Finset.prod_ite_irrel
#align finset.sum_ite_irrel Finset.sum_ite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f : p → α → β) (g : ¬p → α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : p then f h x else g h x) =
if h : p then ∏ x ∈ s, f h x else ∏ x ∈ s, g h x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_dite_irrel Finset.prod_dite_irrel
#align finset.sum_dite_irrel Finset.sum_dite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (x : β) (s : Finset α) :
∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a x a' = if a ∈ s then x else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single' Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle'
#align finset.sum_pi_single' Finset.sum_pi_single'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle {β : α → Type*} [DecidableEq α] [∀ a, CommMonoid (β a)] (a : α)
(f : ∀ a, β a) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a' (f a') a) = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α → β) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ s, mulSupport (f i) := by
simp only [mulSupport_subset_iff', Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists, nmem_mulSupport]
exact fun x ↦ prod_eq_one
#align function.mul_support_prod Finset.mulSupport_prod
#align function.support_sum Finset.support_sum
section indicator
open Set
variable {κ : Type*}
/-- Consider a product of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (· ^ n)`, which maps a second argument of `1` to `1`. Then if `f` is replaced by the
corresponding multiplicative indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly larger
finset without changing the value of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Consider a sum of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (n • ·)`, which maps a second argument of `0` to `0` (or a weighted sum of `f i * h i` or
`f i • h i`, where `f` gives the weights that are multiplied by some other function `h`). Then if
`f` is replaced by the corresponding indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly
larger finset without changing the value of the sum."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one [One α] (f : ι → α) (g : ι → α → β) {s t : Finset ι}
(h : s ⊆ t) (hg : ∀ a, g a 1 = 1) :
∏ i ∈ t, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (f i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) := by rw [prod_subset h fun i _ hn ↦ by simp [hn, hg]]
-- Porting note: This did not use to need the implicit argument
_ = _ := prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg _ <| mulIndicator_of_mem (α := ι) hi f
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset_of_eq_one Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one
#align set.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero Finset.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero
/-- Taking the product of an indicator function over a possibly larger finset is the same as
taking the original function over the original finset. -/
@[to_additive "Summing an indicator function over a possibly larger `Finset` is the same as summing
the original function over the original finset."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset (f : ι → β) {s t : Finset ι} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∏ i ∈ t, mulIndicator (↑s) f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one _ (fun _ ↦ id) h fun _ ↦ rfl
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset
#align set.sum_indicator_subset Finset.sum_indicator_subset
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → κ → β) (t : ι → Set κ) (g : ι → κ)
[DecidablePred fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i] :
∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) (f i) (g i) = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i, f i (g i) := by
refine (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s (fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i) _).symm.trans <|
Eq.trans (congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_) (mul_one _)
· exact prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
· exact prod_eq_one fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_not_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
#align finset.prod_mul_indicator_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_inter [DecidableEq ι] (s t : Finset ι) (f : ι → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (t : Set ι).mulIndicator f i = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter]; rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_prod (s : Finset ι) (t : Set κ) (f : ι → κ → β) :
mulIndicator t (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator t (f i) :=
map_prod (mulIndicatorHom _ _) _ _
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_prod Finset.mulIndicator_prod
#align set.indicator_finset_sum Finset.indicator_sum
variable {κ : Type*}
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β} :
((s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) →
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f = fun a ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f a := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s (by simp) fun i s hi ih hs ↦ funext fun j ↦ ?_
rw [prod_insert hi, set_biUnion_insert, mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter,
ih (hs.subset <| subset_insert _ _)]
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, not_and]
exact fun hji i' hi' hji' ↦ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi' hi).symm <|
hs.elim_set (mem_insert_self _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem hi') _ hji hji'
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.indicator_biUnion
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion_apply (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β}
(h : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) (x : κ) :
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f x = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f x := by
rw [mulIndicator_biUnion s t h]
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion_apply
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply
end indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_bij_ne_one {s : Finset α} {t : Finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 → γ) (hi : ∀ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂, i a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ = i a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, g b ≠ 1 → ∃ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ = b) (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a = g (i a h₁ h₂)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x := by rw [prod_filter_ne_one]
_ = ∏ x ∈ t.filter fun x => g x ≠ 1, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a ha => i a (mem_filter.mp ha).1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp ha).2)
?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
_ = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := prod_filter_ne_one _
· intros a ha
refine (mem_filter.mp ha).elim ?_
intros h₁ h₂
refine (mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi a h₁ _, ?_⟩)
specialize h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
rwa [← h]
· intros a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₁).elim fun _ha₁₁ _ha₁₂ ↦ ?_
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₂).elim fun _ha₂₁ _ha₂₂ ↦ ?_
apply i_inj
· intros b hb
refine (mem_filter.mp hb).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂, eq⟩ := i_surj b h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
exact ⟨a, mem_filter.mpr ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, eq⟩
· refine (fun a ha => (mem_filter.mp ha).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_)
exact h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
#align finset.prod_bij_ne_one Finset.prod_bij_ne_one
#align finset.sum_bij_ne_zero Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, g x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_false Finset.prod_dite_of_false
#align finset.sum_dite_of_false Finset.sum_dite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, f x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_true Finset.prod_dite_of_true
#align finset.sum_dite_of_true Finset.sum_dite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem nonempty_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun H => False.elim <| h <| H.symm ▸ prod_empty) id
#align finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one Finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 := by
classical
rw [← prod_filter_ne_one] at h
rcases nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, (mem_filter.1 hx).1, by simpa using (mem_filter.1 hx).2⟩
#align finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one Finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ_comm (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = f n * ∏ x ∈ range n, f x := by
rw [range_succ, prod_insert not_mem_range_self]
#align finset.prod_range_succ_comm Finset.prod_range_succ_comm
#align finset.sum_range_succ_comm Finset.sum_range_succ_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * f n := by
simp only [mul_comm, prod_range_succ_comm]
#align finset.prod_range_succ Finset.prod_range_succ
#align finset.sum_range_succ Finset.sum_range_succ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ' (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (∏ k ∈ range (n + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ range n, f (k + 1)) * f 0
| 0 => prod_range_succ _ _
| n + 1 => by rw [prod_range_succ _ n, mul_right_comm, ← prod_range_succ' _ n, prod_range_succ]
#align finset.prod_range_succ' Finset.prod_range_succ'
#align finset.sum_range_succ' Finset.sum_range_succ'
@[to_additive]
theorem eventually_constant_prod {u : ℕ → β} {N : ℕ} (hu : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : N ≤ n) :
(∏ k ∈ range n, u k) = ∏ k ∈ range N, u k := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl : n = N + m⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hn
clear hn
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· simp [← add_assoc, prod_range_succ, hm, hu]
#align finset.eventually_constant_prod Finset.eventually_constant_prod
#align finset.eventually_constant_sum Finset.eventually_constant_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add (f : ℕ → β) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + m), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * ∏ x ∈ range m, f (n + x) := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· erw [Nat.add_succ, prod_range_succ, prod_range_succ, hm, mul_assoc]
#align finset.prod_range_add Finset.prod_range_add
#align finset.sum_range_add Finset.sum_range_add
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] (f : ℕ → α) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ k ∈ range (n + m), f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k = ∏ k ∈ Finset.range m, f (n + k) :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_range_add f n m)
#align finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range Finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range
#align finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range Finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_zero (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 0, f k = 1 := by rw [range_zero, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_range_zero Finset.prod_range_zero
#align finset.sum_range_zero Finset.sum_range_zero
@[to_additive sum_range_one]
theorem prod_range_one (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 1, f k = f 0 := by
rw [range_one, prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_range_one Finset.prod_range_one
#align finset.sum_range_one Finset.sum_range_one
open List
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_map_count [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) :
(l.map f).prod = ∏ m ∈ l.toFinset, f m ^ l.count m := by
induction' l with a s IH; · simp only [map_nil, prod_nil, count_nil, pow_zero, prod_const_one]
simp only [List.map, List.prod_cons, toFinset_cons, IH]
by_cases has : a ∈ s.toFinset
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_erase has, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ← mul_assoc, count_cons_self, pow_succ']
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne (ne_of_mem_erase hx)]
rw [prod_insert has, count_cons_self, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt mem_toFinset.2 has), pow_one]
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne]
rintro rfl
exact has hx
#align finset.prod_list_map_count Finset.prod_list_map_count
#align finset.sum_list_map_count Finset.sum_list_map_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_count [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (s : List α) :
s.prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, m ^ s.count m := by simpa using prod_list_map_count s id
#align finset.prod_list_count Finset.prod_list_count
#align finset.sum_list_count Finset.sum_list_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_count_of_subset [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (m : List α) (s : Finset α)
(hs : m.toFinset ⊆ s) : m.prod = ∏ i ∈ s, i ^ m.count i := by
rw [prod_list_count]
refine prod_subset hs fun x _ hx => ?_
rw [mem_toFinset] at hx
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem hx, pow_zero]
#align finset.prod_list_count_of_subset Finset.prod_list_count_of_subset
#align finset.sum_list_count_of_subset Finset.sum_list_count_of_subset
theorem sum_filter_count_eq_countP [DecidableEq α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α) :
∑ x ∈ l.toFinset.filter p, l.count x = l.countP p := by
simp [Finset.sum, sum_map_count_dedup_filter_eq_countP p l]
#align finset.sum_filter_count_eq_countp Finset.sum_filter_count_eq_countP
open Multiset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_map_count [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M]
(f : α → M) : (s.map f).prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, f m ^ s.count m := by
refine Quot.induction_on s fun l => ?_
simp [prod_list_map_count l f]
#align finset.prod_multiset_map_count Finset.prod_multiset_map_count
#align finset.sum_multiset_map_count Finset.sum_multiset_map_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_count [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, m ^ s.count m := by
convert prod_multiset_map_count s id
rw [Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_multiset_count Finset.prod_multiset_count
#align finset.sum_multiset_count Finset.sum_multiset_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_count_of_subset [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (m : Multiset α) (s : Finset α)
(hs : m.toFinset ⊆ s) : m.prod = ∏ i ∈ s, i ^ m.count i := by
revert hs
refine Quot.induction_on m fun l => ?_
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', prod_coe, coe_count]
apply prod_list_count_of_subset l s
#align finset.prod_multiset_count_of_subset Finset.prod_multiset_count_of_subset
#align finset.sum_multiset_count_of_subset Finset.sum_multiset_count_of_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mem_multiset [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (f : { x // x ∈ m } → β) (g : α → β)
(hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x) : ∏ x : { x // x ∈ m }, f x = ∏ x ∈ m.toFinset, g x := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x _ ↦ x) (fun x hx ↦ ⟨x, Multiset.mem_toFinset.1 hx⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp [hfg]
#align finset.prod_mem_multiset Finset.prod_mem_multiset
#align finset.sum_mem_multiset Finset.sum_mem_multiset
/-- To prove a property of a product, it suffices to prove that
the property is multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive "To prove a property of a sum, it suffices to prove that
the property is additive and holds on summands."]
theorem prod_induction {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) (p : M → Prop)
(hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (unit : p 1) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) :
p <| ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
Multiset.prod_induction _ _ hom unit (Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.mpr base)
#align finset.prod_induction Finset.prod_induction
#align finset.sum_induction Finset.sum_induction
/-- To prove a property of a product, it suffices to prove that
the property is multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive "To prove a property of a sum, it suffices to prove that
the property is additive and holds on summands."]
theorem prod_induction_nonempty {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) (p : M → Prop)
(hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (nonempty : s.Nonempty) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) :
p <| ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
Multiset.prod_induction_nonempty p hom (by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty.mp nonempty])
(Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.mpr base)
#align finset.prod_induction_nonempty Finset.prod_induction_nonempty
#align finset.sum_induction_nonempty Finset.sum_induction_nonempty
/-- For any product along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function, we can verify
that it's equal to a different function just by checking ratios of adjacent terms.
This is a multiplicative discrete analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus. -/
@[to_additive "For any sum along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function, we can
verify that it's equal to a different function just by checking differences of adjacent terms.
This is a discrete analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus."]
theorem prod_range_induction (f s : ℕ → β) (base : s 0 = 1)
(step : ∀ n, s (n + 1) = s n * f n) (n : ℕ) :
∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, f k = s n := by
induction' n with k hk
· rw [Finset.prod_range_zero, base]
· simp only [hk, Finset.prod_range_succ, step, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_range_induction Finset.prod_range_induction
#align finset.sum_range_induction Finset.sum_range_induction
/-- A telescoping product along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative group valued function reduces to
the ratio of the last and first factors. -/
@[to_additive "A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of an additive commutative group valued
function reduces to the difference of the last and first terms."]
theorem prod_range_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ range n, f (i + 1) / f i) = f n / f 0 := by apply prod_range_induction <;> simp
#align finset.prod_range_div Finset.prod_range_div
#align finset.sum_range_sub Finset.sum_range_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_div' {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ range n, f i / f (i + 1)) = f 0 / f n := by apply prod_range_induction <;> simp
#align finset.prod_range_div' Finset.prod_range_div'
#align finset.sum_range_sub' Finset.sum_range_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_prod_range_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
f n = f 0 * ∏ i ∈ range n, f (i + 1) / f i := by rw [prod_range_div, mul_div_cancel]
#align finset.eq_prod_range_div Finset.eq_prod_range_div
#align finset.eq_sum_range_sub Finset.eq_sum_range_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_prod_range_div' {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
f n = ∏ i ∈ range (n + 1), if i = 0 then f 0 else f i / f (i - 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [Finset.eq_prod_range_div f]
simp [Finset.prod_range_succ', mul_comm]
#align finset.eq_prod_range_div' Finset.eq_prod_range_div'
#align finset.eq_sum_range_sub' Finset.eq_sum_range_sub'
/-- A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n-1}` of an `ℕ`-valued function
reduces to the difference of the last and first terms
when the function we are summing is monotone.
-/
theorem sum_range_tsub [CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α]
[ContravariantClass α α (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] {f : ℕ → α} (h : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, (f (i + 1) - f i) = f n - f 0 := by
apply sum_range_induction
case base => apply tsub_self
case step =>
intro n
have h₁ : f n ≤ f (n + 1) := h (Nat.le_succ _)
have h₂ : f 0 ≤ f n := h (Nat.zero_le _)
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h₂, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h₁]
#align finset.sum_range_tsub Finset.sum_range_tsub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const (b : β) : ∏ _x ∈ s, b = b ^ s.card :=
(congr_arg _ <| s.val.map_const b).trans <| Multiset.prod_replicate s.card b
#align finset.prod_const Finset.prod_const
#align finset.sum_const Finset.sum_const
@[to_additive sum_eq_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_eq_pow_card {b : β} (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = b) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = b ^ s.card :=
(prod_congr rfl hf).trans <| prod_const _
#align finset.prod_eq_pow_card Finset.prod_eq_pow_card
#align finset.sum_eq_card_nsmul Finset.sum_eq_card_nsmul
@[to_additive card_nsmul_add_sum]
theorem pow_card_mul_prod {b : β} : b ^ s.card * ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, b * f a :=
(Finset.prod_const b).symm ▸ prod_mul_distrib.symm
@[to_additive sum_add_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_mul_pow_card {b : β} : (∏ a ∈ s, f a) * b ^ s.card = ∏ a ∈ s, f a * b :=
(Finset.prod_const b).symm ▸ prod_mul_distrib.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_prod_const (b : β) : ∀ n, b ^ n = ∏ _k ∈ range n, b := by simp
#align finset.pow_eq_prod_const Finset.pow_eq_prod_const
#align finset.nsmul_eq_sum_const Finset.nsmul_eq_sum_const
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pow (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ^ n = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) ^ n :=
Multiset.prod_map_pow
#align finset.prod_pow Finset.prod_pow
#align finset.sum_nsmul Finset.sum_nsmul
@[to_additive sum_nsmul_assoc]
lemma prod_pow_eq_pow_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℕ) (a : β) :
∏ i ∈ s, a ^ f i = a ^ ∑ i ∈ s, f i :=
cons_induction (by simp) (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ by simp [prod_cons, sum_cons, pow_add, *]) s
#align finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum Finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum
/-- A product over `Finset.powersetCard` which only depends on the size of the sets is constant. -/
@[to_additive
"A sum over `Finset.powersetCard` which only depends on the size of the sets is constant."]
lemma prod_powersetCard (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ t ∈ powersetCard n s, f t.card = f n ^ s.card.choose n := by
rw [prod_eq_pow_card, card_powersetCard]; rintro a ha; rw [(mem_powersetCard.1 ha).2]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_flip {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → β) :
(∏ r ∈ range (n + 1), f (n - r)) = ∏ k ∈ range (n + 1), f k := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [prod_range_one, prod_range_one]
· rw [prod_range_succ', prod_range_succ _ (Nat.succ n)]
simp [← ih]
#align finset.prod_flip Finset.prod_flip
#align finset.sum_flip Finset.sum_flip
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_involution {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} :
∀ (g : ∀ a ∈ s, α) (_ : ∀ a ha, f a * f (g a ha) = 1) (_ : ∀ a ha, f a ≠ 1 → g a ha ≠ a)
(g_mem : ∀ a ha, g a ha ∈ s) (_ : ∀ a ha, g (g a ha) (g_mem a ha) = a),
∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; haveI := Classical.decEq β
exact
Finset.strongInductionOn s fun s ih g h g_ne g_mem g_inv =>
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun hs => hs.symm ▸ rfl) fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
have hmem : ∀ y ∈ (s.erase x).erase (g x hx), y ∈ s := fun y hy =>
mem_of_mem_erase (mem_of_mem_erase hy)
have g_inj : ∀ {x hx y hy}, g x hx = g y hy → x = y := fun {x hx y hy} h => by
rw [← g_inv x hx, ← g_inv y hy]; simp [h]
have ih' : (∏ y ∈ erase (erase s x) (g x hx), f y) = (1 : β) :=
ih ((s.erase x).erase (g x hx))
⟨Subset.trans (erase_subset _ _) (erase_subset _ _), fun h =>
not_mem_erase (g x hx) (s.erase x) (h (g_mem x hx))⟩
(fun y hy => g y (hmem y hy)) (fun y hy => h y (hmem y hy))
(fun y hy => g_ne y (hmem y hy))
(fun y hy =>
mem_erase.2
⟨fun h : g y _ = g x hx => by simp [g_inj h] at hy,
mem_erase.2
⟨fun h : g y _ = x => by
have : y = g x hx := g_inv y (hmem y hy) ▸ by simp [h]
simp [this] at hy, g_mem y (hmem y hy)⟩⟩)
fun y hy => g_inv y (hmem y hy)
if hx1 : f x = 1 then
ih' ▸
Eq.symm
(prod_subset hmem fun y hy hy₁ =>
have : y = x ∨ y = g x hx := by
simpa [hy, -not_and, mem_erase, not_and_or, or_comm] using hy₁
this.elim (fun hy => hy.symm ▸ hx1) fun hy =>
h x hx ▸ hy ▸ hx1.symm ▸ (one_mul _).symm)
else by
rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
insert_erase (mem_erase.2 ⟨g_ne x hx hx1, g_mem x hx⟩),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ih', mul_one, h x hx]
#align finset.prod_involution Finset.prod_involution
#align finset.sum_involution Finset.sum_involution
/-- The product of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the product over `b ∈ s.image g` of
`f b` to the power of the cardinality of the fibre of `b`. See also `Finset.prod_image`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the sum over `b ∈ s.image g`
of `f b` times of the cardinality of the fibre of `b`. See also `Finset.sum_image`."]
theorem prod_comp [DecidableEq γ] (f : γ → β) (g : α → γ) :
∏ a ∈ s, f (g a) = ∏ b ∈ s.image g, f b ^ (s.filter fun a => g a = b).card := by
simp_rw [← prod_const, prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' fun _ ↦ mem_image_of_mem _]
#align finset.prod_comp Finset.prod_comp
#align finset.sum_comp Finset.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_piecewise [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f g : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, (t.piecewise f g) x) = (∏ x ∈ s ∩ t, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s \ t, g x := by
erw [prod_ite, filter_mem_eq_inter, ← sdiff_eq_filter]
#align finset.prod_piecewise Finset.prod_piecewise
#align finset.sum_piecewise Finset.sum_piecewise
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_inter_mul_prod_diff [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s ∩ t, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s \ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (s.prod_piecewise t f f).symm
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Finset.piecewise]
#align finset.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff Finset.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff
#align finset.sum_inter_add_sum_diff Finset.sum_inter_add_sum_diff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s)
(f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f i * ∏ x ∈ s \ {i}, f x := by
convert (s.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff {i} f).symm
simp [h]
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton Finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton
#align finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton Finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s)
(f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = (∏ x ∈ s \ {i}, f x) * f i := by
rw [prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton h, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul Finset.prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Fintype.prod_eq_mul_prod_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (a : α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i, f i = f a * ∏ i ∈ {a}ᶜ, f i :=
prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton (mem_univ a) f
#align fintype.prod_eq_mul_prod_compl Fintype.prod_eq_mul_prod_compl
#align fintype.sum_eq_add_sum_compl Fintype.sum_eq_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Fintype.prod_eq_prod_compl_mul [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (a : α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i ∈ {a}ᶜ, f i) * f a :=
prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem_univ a) f
#align fintype.prod_eq_prod_compl_mul Fintype.prod_eq_prod_compl_mul
#align fintype.sum_eq_sum_compl_add Fintype.sum_eq_sum_compl_add
theorem dvd_prod_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∈ s) : f a ∣ ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
classical
rw [Finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton ha]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align finset.dvd_prod_of_mem Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem
/-- A product can be partitioned into a product of products, each equivalent under a setoid. -/
@[to_additive "A sum can be partitioned into a sum of sums, each equivalent under a setoid."]
theorem prod_partition (R : Setoid α) [DecidableRel R.r] :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ xbar ∈ s.image Quotient.mk'', ∏ y ∈ s.filter (⟦·⟧ = xbar), f y := by
refine (Finset.prod_image' f fun x _hx => ?_).symm
rfl
#align finset.prod_partition Finset.prod_partition
#align finset.sum_partition Finset.sum_partition
/-- If we can partition a product into subsets that cancel out, then the whole product cancels. -/
@[to_additive "If we can partition a sum into subsets that cancel out, then the whole sum cancels."]
theorem prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels (R : Setoid α) [DecidableRel R.r]
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ s.filter fun y => y ≈ x, f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 := by
rw [prod_partition R, ← Finset.prod_eq_one]
intro xbar xbar_in_s
obtain ⟨x, x_in_s, rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp xbar_in_s
simp only [← Quotient.eq] at h
exact h x x_in_s
#align finset.prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels Finset.prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels
#align finset.sum_cancels_of_partition_cancels Finset.sum_cancels_of_partition_cancels
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_update_of_not_mem [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∉ s) (f : α → β)
(b : β) : ∏ x ∈ s, Function.update f i b x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
apply prod_congr rfl
intros j hj
have : j ≠ i := by
rintro rfl
exact h hj
simp [this]
#align finset.prod_update_of_not_mem Finset.prod_update_of_not_mem
#align finset.sum_update_of_not_mem Finset.sum_update_of_not_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_update_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) :
∏ x ∈ s, Function.update f i b x = b * ∏ x ∈ s \ singleton i, f x := by
rw [update_eq_piecewise, prod_piecewise]
simp [h]
#align finset.prod_update_of_mem Finset.prod_update_of_mem
#align finset.sum_update_of_mem Finset.sum_update_of_mem
/-- If a product of a `Finset` of size at most 1 has a given value, so
do the terms in that product. -/
@[to_additive eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq "If a sum of a `Finset` of size at most 1 has a given
value, so do the terms in that sum."]
theorem eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq {s : Finset α} (hc : s.card ≤ 1) {f : α → β} {b : β}
(h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = b) : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = b := by
intro x hx
by_cases hc0 : s.card = 0
· exact False.elim (card_ne_zero_of_mem hx hc0)
· have h1 : s.card = 1 := le_antisymm hc (Nat.one_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0))
rw [card_eq_one] at h1
cases' h1 with x2 hx2
rw [hx2, mem_singleton] at hx
simp_rw [hx2] at h
rw [hx]
rw [prod_singleton] at h
exact h
#align finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq Finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq
#align finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq Finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq
/-- Taking a product over `s : Finset α` is the same as multiplying the value on a single element
`f a` by the product of `s.erase a`.
See `Multiset.prod_map_erase` for the `Multiset` version. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `s : Finset α` is the same as adding the value on a single element
`f a` to the sum over `s.erase a`.
See `Multiset.sum_map_erase` for the `Multiset` version."]
theorem mul_prod_erase [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
(f a * ∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← prod_insert (not_mem_erase a s), insert_erase h]
#align finset.mul_prod_erase Finset.mul_prod_erase
#align finset.add_sum_erase Finset.add_sum_erase
/-- A variant of `Finset.mul_prod_erase` with the multiplication swapped. -/
@[to_additive "A variant of `Finset.add_sum_erase` with the addition swapped."]
theorem prod_erase_mul [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
(∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_erase s f h]
#align finset.prod_erase_mul Finset.prod_erase_mul
#align finset.sum_erase_add Finset.sum_erase_add
/-- If a function applied at a point is 1, a product is unchanged by
removing that point, if present, from a `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "If a function applied at a point is 0, a sum is unchanged by
removing that point, if present, from a `Finset`."]
theorem prod_erase [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) {f : α → β} {a : α} (h : f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
refine prod_subset sdiff_subset fun x hx hnx => ?_
rw [sdiff_singleton_eq_erase] at hnx
rwa [eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase hx hnx]
#align finset.prod_erase Finset.prod_erase
#align finset.sum_erase Finset.sum_erase
/-- See also `Finset.prod_boole`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_boole`."]
theorem prod_ite_one (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i → p j → i = j) (a : β) :
∏ i ∈ s, ite (p i) a 1 = ite (∃ i ∈ s, p i) a 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨i, hi, hpi⟩ := h
rw [prod_eq_single_of_mem _ hi, if_pos hpi]
exact fun j hj hji ↦ if_neg fun hpj ↦ hji <| h _ hj _ hi hpj hpi
· push_neg at h
rw [prod_eq_one]
exact fun i hi => if_neg (h i hi)
#align finset.prod_ite_one Finset.prod_ite_one
#align finset.sum_ite_zero Finset.sum_ite_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_erase_lt_of_one_lt {γ : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [OrderedCommMonoid γ]
[CovariantClass γ γ (· * ·) (· < ·)] {s : Finset α} {d : α} (hd : d ∈ s) {f : α → γ}
(hdf : 1 < f d) : ∏ m ∈ s.erase d, f m < ∏ m ∈ s, f m := by
conv in ∏ m ∈ s, f m => rw [← Finset.insert_erase hd]
rw [Finset.prod_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase d s)]
exact lt_mul_of_one_lt_left' _ hdf
#align finset.prod_erase_lt_of_one_lt Finset.prod_erase_lt_of_one_lt
#align finset.sum_erase_lt_of_pos Finset.sum_erase_lt_of_pos
/-- If a product is 1 and the function is 1 except possibly at one
point, it is 1 everywhere on the `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "If a sum is 0 and the function is 0 except possibly at one
point, it is 0 everywhere on the `Finset`."]
theorem eq_one_of_prod_eq_one {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} {a : α} (hp : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1)
(h1 : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≠ a → f x = 1) : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1 := by
intro x hx
classical
by_cases h : x = a
· rw [h]
rw [h] at hx
rw [← prod_subset (singleton_subset_iff.2 hx) fun t ht ha => h1 t ht (not_mem_singleton.1 ha),
prod_singleton] at hp
exact hp
· exact h1 x hx h
#align finset.eq_one_of_prod_eq_one Finset.eq_one_of_prod_eq_one
#align finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive sum_boole_nsmul]
theorem prod_pow_boole [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
(∏ x ∈ s, f x ^ ite (a = x) 1 0) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 1 := by simp
#align finset.prod_pow_boole Finset.prod_pow_boole
theorem prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd {S : Finset α} (g1 g2 : α → β) (h : ∀ a ∈ S, g1 a ∣ g2 a) :
S.prod g1 ∣ S.prod g2 := by
classical
induction' S using Finset.induction_on' with a T _haS _hTS haT IH
· simp
· rw [Finset.prod_insert haT, prod_insert haT]
exact mul_dvd_mul (h a <| T.mem_insert_self a) <| IH fun b hb ↦ h b <| mem_insert_of_mem hb
#align finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd
theorem prod_dvd_prod_of_subset {ι M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (s t : Finset ι) (f : ι → M)
(h : s ⊆ t) : (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ∣ ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
Multiset.prod_dvd_prod_of_le <| Multiset.map_le_map <| by simpa
#align finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_subset Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_subset
end CommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [DecidableEq ι] [CancelCommMonoid α] {s t : Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sdiff_eq_prod_sdiff_iff :
∏ i ∈ s \ t, f i = ∏ i ∈ t \ s, f i ↔ ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
eq_comm.trans $ eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul $ by
rw [← prod_union disjoint_sdiff_self_left, ← prod_union disjoint_sdiff_self_left,
sdiff_union_self_eq_union, sdiff_union_self_eq_union, union_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sdiff_ne_prod_sdiff_iff :
∏ i ∈ s \ t, f i ≠ ∏ i ∈ t \ s, f i ↔ ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
prod_sdiff_eq_prod_sdiff_iff.not
end CancelCommMonoid
theorem card_eq_sum_ones (s : Finset α) : s.card = ∑ x ∈ s, 1 := by simp
#align finset.card_eq_sum_ones Finset.card_eq_sum_ones
theorem sum_const_nat {m : ℕ} {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = m) :
∑ x ∈ s, f x = card s * m := by
rw [← Nat.nsmul_eq_mul, ← sum_const]
apply sum_congr rfl h₁
#align finset.sum_const_nat Finset.sum_const_nat
lemma sum_card_fiberwise_eq_card_filter {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ)
(g : ι → κ) : ∑ j ∈ t, (s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j).card = (s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t).card := by
simpa only [card_eq_sum_ones] using sum_fiberwise_eq_sum_filter _ _ _ _
lemma card_filter (p) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
(filter p s).card = ∑ a ∈ s, ite (p a) 1 0 := by simp [sum_ite]
#align finset.card_filter Finset.card_filter
section Opposite
open MulOpposite
/-- Moving to the opposite additive commutative monoid commutes with summing. -/
@[simp]
theorem op_sum [AddCommMonoid β] {s : Finset α} (f : α → β) :
op (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, op (f x) :=
map_sum (opAddEquiv : β ≃+ βᵐᵒᵖ) _ _
#align finset.op_sum Finset.op_sum
@[simp]
theorem unop_sum [AddCommMonoid β] {s : Finset α} (f : α → βᵐᵒᵖ) :
unop (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, unop (f x) :=
map_sum (opAddEquiv : β ≃+ βᵐᵒᵖ).symm _ _
#align finset.unop_sum Finset.unop_sum
end Opposite
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_inv_distrib : (∏ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ x ∈ s, f x)⁻¹ :=
Multiset.prod_map_inv
#align finset.prod_inv_distrib Finset.prod_inv_distrib
#align finset.sum_neg_distrib Finset.sum_neg_distrib
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_div_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x / g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Multiset.prod_map_div
#align finset.prod_div_distrib Finset.prod_div_distrib
#align finset.sum_sub_distrib Finset.sum_sub_distrib
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_zpow (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) (n : ℤ) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a ^ n = (∏ a ∈ s, f a) ^ n :=
Multiset.prod_map_zpow
#align finset.prod_zpow Finset.prod_zpow
#align finset.sum_zsmul Finset.sum_zsmul
end DivisionCommMonoid
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup β] [DecidableEq α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_sdiff_eq_div (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₂, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq', prod_sdiff h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff_eq_div Finset.prod_sdiff_eq_div
#align finset.sum_sdiff_eq_sub Finset.sum_sdiff_eq_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff_div_prod_sdiff :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₂, f x) / ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x := by
simp [← Finset.prod_sdiff (@inf_le_left _ _ s₁ s₂), ← Finset.prod_sdiff (@inf_le_right _ _ s₁ s₂)]
#align finset.prod_sdiff_div_prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff_div_prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff_sub_sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff_sub_sum_sdiff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_erase_eq_div {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
∏ x ∈ s.erase a, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) / f a := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq', prod_erase_mul _ _ h]
#align finset.prod_erase_eq_div Finset.prod_erase_eq_div
#align finset.sum_erase_eq_sub Finset.sum_erase_eq_sub
end CommGroup
@[simp]
theorem card_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) :
card (s.sigma t) = ∑ a ∈ s, card (t a) :=
Multiset.card_sigma _ _
#align finset.card_sigma Finset.card_sigma
@[simp]
theorem card_disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).card = s.sum fun i => (t i).card :=
Multiset.card_bind _ _
#align finset.card_disj_Union Finset.card_disjiUnion
theorem card_biUnion [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : α → Finset β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → Disjoint (t x) (t y)) :
(s.biUnion t).card = ∑ u ∈ s, card (t u) :=
calc
(s.biUnion t).card = ∑ i ∈ s.biUnion t, 1 := card_eq_sum_ones _
_ = ∑ a ∈ s, ∑ _i ∈ t a, 1 := Finset.sum_biUnion h
_ = ∑ u ∈ s, card (t u) := by simp_rw [card_eq_sum_ones]
#align finset.card_bUnion Finset.card_biUnion
theorem card_biUnion_le [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : α → Finset β} :
(s.biUnion t).card ≤ ∑ a ∈ s, (t a).card :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
Finset.induction_on s (by simp) fun a s has ih =>
calc
((insert a s).biUnion t).card ≤ (t a).card + (s.biUnion t).card := by
{ rw [biUnion_insert]; exact Finset.card_union_le _ _ }
_ ≤ ∑ a ∈ insert a s, card (t a) := by rw [sum_insert has]; exact Nat.add_le_add_left ih _
#align finset.card_bUnion_le Finset.card_biUnion_le
theorem card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) : s.card = ∑ a ∈ t, (s.filter fun x => f x = a).card := by
simp only [card_eq_sum_ones, sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to H]
#align finset.card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise Finset.card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise
theorem card_eq_sum_card_image [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) :
s.card = ∑ a ∈ s.image f, (s.filter fun x => f x = a).card :=
card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise fun _ => mem_image_of_mem _
#align finset.card_eq_sum_card_image Finset.card_eq_sum_card_image
theorem mem_sum {f : α → Multiset β} (s : Finset α) (b : β) :
(b ∈ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a := by
classical
refine s.induction_on (by simp) ?_
intro a t hi ih
simp [sum_insert hi, ih, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align finset.mem_sum Finset.mem_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_unique_nonempty {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [Unique α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(h : s.Nonempty) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f default := by
rw [h.eq_singleton_default, Finset.prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_unique_nonempty Finset.prod_unique_nonempty
#align finset.sum_unique_nonempty Finset.sum_unique_nonempty
theorem sum_nat_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∑ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.sum_nat_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.sum, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.sum_nat_mod Finset.sum_nat_mod
theorem prod_nat_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∏ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.prod_nat_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_nat_mod Finset.prod_nat_mod
theorem sum_int_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℤ) (f : α → ℤ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∑ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.sum_int_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.sum, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.sum_int_mod Finset.sum_int_mod
theorem prod_int_mod (s : Finset α) (n : ℤ) (f : α → ℤ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) % n = (∏ i ∈ s, f i % n) % n :=
(Multiset.prod_int_mod _ _).trans <| by rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_int_mod Finset.prod_int_mod
end Finset
namespace Fintype
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [Fintype ι] [Fintype κ]
open Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
/-- `Fintype.prod_bijective` is a variant of `Finset.prod_bij` that accepts `Function.Bijective`.
See `Function.Bijective.prod_comp` for a version without `h`. -/
@[to_additive "`Fintype.sum_bijective` is a variant of `Finset.sum_bij` that accepts
`Function.Bijective`.
See `Function.Bijective.sum_comp` for a version without `h`. "]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α)
(h : ∀ x, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ x, f x = ∏ x, g x :=
prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) (by simp) (by simp [h])
#align fintype.prod_bijective Fintype.prod_bijective
#align fintype.sum_bijective Fintype.sum_bijective
@[to_additive] alias _root_.Function.Bijective.finset_prod := prod_bijective
/-- `Fintype.prod_equiv` is a specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that
automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Equiv.prod_comp` for a version without `h`.
-/
@[to_additive "`Fintype.sum_equiv` is a specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that
automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Equiv.sum_comp` for a version without `h`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) (h : ∀ x, f x = g (e x)) :
∏ x, f x = ∏ x, g x := prod_bijective _ e.bijective _ _ h
#align fintype.prod_equiv Fintype.prod_equiv
#align fintype.sum_equiv Fintype.sum_equiv
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Function.Bijective.prod_comp {e : ι → κ} (he : e.Bijective) (g : κ → α) :
∏ i, g (e i) = ∏ i, g i := prod_bijective _ he _ _ fun _ ↦ rfl
#align function.bijective.prod_comp Function.Bijective.prod_comp
#align function.bijective.sum_comp Function.Bijective.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Equiv.prod_comp (e : ι ≃ κ) (g : κ → α) : ∏ i, g (e i) = ∏ i, g i :=
prod_equiv e _ _ fun _ ↦ rfl
#align equiv.prod_comp Equiv.prod_comp
#align equiv.sum_comp Equiv.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injective (e : ι → κ) (he : Injective e) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α)
(h' : ∀ i ∉ Set.range e, g i = 1) (h : ∀ i, f i = g (e i)) : ∏ i, f i = ∏ j, g j :=
prod_of_injOn e he.injOn (by simp) (by simpa using h') (fun i _ ↦ h i)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise [DecidableEq κ] (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i : {i // g i = j}, f i = ∏ i, f i := by
rw [← Finset.prod_fiberwise _ g f]
congr with j
exact (prod_subtype _ (by simp) _).symm
#align fintype.prod_fiberwise Fintype.prod_fiberwise
#align fintype.sum_fiberwise Fintype.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' [DecidableEq κ] (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i : {i // g i = j}, f j = ∏ i, f (g i) := by
rw [← Finset.prod_fiberwise' _ g f]
congr with j
exact (prod_subtype _ (by simp) fun _ ↦ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_unique {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [Unique α] [Fintype α] (f : α → β) :
∏ x : α, f x = f default := by rw [univ_unique, prod_singleton]
#align fintype.prod_unique Fintype.prod_unique
#align fintype.sum_unique Fintype.sum_unique
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_empty {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [IsEmpty α] [Fintype α] (f : α → β) :
∏ x : α, f x = 1 :=
Finset.prod_of_empty _
#align fintype.prod_empty Fintype.prod_empty
#align fintype.sum_empty Fintype.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subsingleton {α β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] [Subsingleton α] [Fintype α] (f : α → β)
(a : α) : ∏ x : α, f x = f a := by
haveI : Unique α := uniqueOfSubsingleton a
rw [prod_unique f, Subsingleton.elim default a]
#align fintype.prod_subsingleton Fintype.prod_subsingleton
#align fintype.sum_subsingleton Fintype.sum_subsingleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β] (p : α → Prop)
(f : α → β) [DecidablePred p] :
(∏ i : { x // p x }, f i) * ∏ i : { x // ¬p x }, f i = ∏ i, f i := by
classical
let s := { x | p x }.toFinset
rw [← Finset.prod_subtype s, ← Finset.prod_subtype sᶜ]
· exact Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl _ _
· simp [s]
· simp [s]
#align fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype
#align fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype
@[to_additive] lemma prod_subset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} (h : ∀ i, f i ≠ 1 → i ∈ s) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
Finset.prod_subset s.subset_univ $ by simpa [not_imp_comm (a := _ ∈ s)]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_ite_eq_ite_exists (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ i j, p i → p j → i = j)
(a : α) : ∏ i, ite (p i) a 1 = ite (∃ i, p i) a 1 := by
simp [prod_ite_one univ p (by simpa using h)]
variable [DecidableEq ι]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_dite_eq`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_dite_eq`."] lemma prod_dite_eq (i : ι) (f : ∀ j, i = j → α) :
∏ j, (if h : i = j then f j h else 1) = f i rfl := by
rw [Finset.prod_dite_eq, if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_dite_eq'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_dite_eq'`."] lemma prod_dite_eq' (i : ι) (f : ∀ j, j = i → α) :
∏ j, (if h : j = i then f j h else 1) = f i rfl := by
rw [Finset.prod_dite_eq', if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_ite_eq`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_ite_eq`."]
lemma prod_ite_eq (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : ∏ j, (if i = j then f j else 1) = f i := by
rw [Finset.prod_ite_eq, if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_ite_eq'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_ite_eq'`."]
lemma prod_ite_eq' (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : ∏ j, (if j = i then f j else 1) = f i := by
rw [Finset.prod_ite_eq', if_pos (mem_univ _)]
/-- See also `Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_pi_single`."]
lemma prod_pi_mulSingle {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CommMonoid (α i)] (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, α i) :
∏ j, Pi.mulSingle j (f j) i = f i := prod_dite_eq _ _
/-- See also `Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_pi_single'`."]
lemma prod_pi_mulSingle' (i : ι) (a : α) : ∏ j, Pi.mulSingle i a j = a := prod_dite_eq' _ _
end CommMonoid
end Fintype
namespace Finset
variable [CommMonoid α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_attach_univ [Fintype ι] (f : {i // i ∈ @univ ι _} → α) :
∏ i ∈ univ.attach, f i = ∏ i, f ⟨i, mem_univ _⟩ :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv mem_univ) _ _ $ by simp
#align finset.prod_attach_univ Finset.prod_attach_univ
#align finset.sum_attach_univ Finset.sum_attach_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_erase_attach [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι} (f : ι → α) (i : ↑s) :
∏ j ∈ s.attach.erase i, f ↑j = ∏ j ∈ s.erase ↑i, f j := by
rw [← Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, ← prod_map]
simp [attach_map_val]
end Finset
namespace List
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_toFinset {M : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) :
∀ {l : List α} (_hl : l.Nodup), l.toFinset.prod f = (l.map f).prod
| [], _ => by simp
| a :: l, hl => by
let ⟨not_mem, hl⟩ := List.nodup_cons.mp hl
simp [Finset.prod_insert (mt List.mem_toFinset.mp not_mem), prod_toFinset _ hl]
#align list.prod_to_finset List.prod_toFinset
#align list.sum_to_finset List.sum_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem sum_toFinset_count_eq_length [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
∑ a in l.toFinset, l.count a = l.length := by
simpa using (Finset.sum_list_map_count l fun _ => (1 : ℕ)).symm
end List
namespace Multiset
theorem disjoint_list_sum_left {a : Multiset α} {l : List (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint l.sum a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, Multiset.Disjoint b a := by
induction' l with b bs ih
· simp only [zero_disjoint, List.not_mem_nil, IsEmpty.forall_iff, forall_const, List.sum_nil]
· simp_rw [List.sum_cons, disjoint_add_left, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp]
simp [and_congr_left_iff, iff_self_iff, ih]
#align multiset.disjoint_list_sum_left Multiset.disjoint_list_sum_left
theorem disjoint_list_sum_right {a : Multiset α} {l : List (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint a l.sum ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, Multiset.Disjoint a b := by
simpa only [@disjoint_comm _ a] using disjoint_list_sum_left
#align multiset.disjoint_list_sum_right Multiset.disjoint_list_sum_right
theorem disjoint_sum_left {a : Multiset α} {i : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint i.sum a ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint b a :=
Quotient.inductionOn i fun l => by
rw [quot_mk_to_coe, Multiset.sum_coe]
exact disjoint_list_sum_left
#align multiset.disjoint_sum_left Multiset.disjoint_sum_left
theorem disjoint_sum_right {a : Multiset α} {i : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
Multiset.Disjoint a i.sum ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint a b := by
simpa only [@disjoint_comm _ a] using disjoint_sum_left
#align multiset.disjoint_sum_right Multiset.disjoint_sum_right
theorem disjoint_finset_sum_left {β : Type*} {i : Finset β} {f : β → Multiset α} {a : Multiset α} :
Multiset.Disjoint (i.sum f) a ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint (f b) a := by
convert @disjoint_sum_left _ a (map f i.val)
simp [and_congr_left_iff, iff_self_iff]
#align multiset.disjoint_finset_sum_left Multiset.disjoint_finset_sum_left
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 2,450 | 2,452 | theorem disjoint_finset_sum_right {β : Type*} {i : Finset β} {f : β → Multiset α}
{a : Multiset α} : Multiset.Disjoint a (i.sum f) ↔ ∀ b ∈ i, Multiset.Disjoint a (f b) := by |
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using disjoint_finset_sum_left
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### mem -/
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
/-! ### List subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
/-! ### tail -/
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
/-! ### next? -/
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
/-! ### get? -/
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
/-! ### drop -/
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
/-! ### modifyNth -/
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
/-! ### set -/
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
/-! ### removeNth -/
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
/-! ### tail -/
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
/-! ### eraseP -/
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [BEq α]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP' (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a = l.eraseP (· == a) := by
induction l
· simp
· next b t ih =>
rw [erase_cons, eraseP_cons, ih]
if h : b == a then simp [h] else simp [h]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) : ∀ l : List α, l.erase a = l.eraseP (a == ·)
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by
if h : a = b then simp [h] else simp [h, Ne.symm h, erase_eq_eraseP a l]
theorem exists_erase_eq [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, e, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_eraseP h (beq_self_eq_true _)
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, fun h => h₁ _ h (beq_self_eq_true _), eq_of_beq e ▸ h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact length_eraseP_of_mem h (beq_self_eq_true a)
theorem erase_append_left [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ : List α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ := by
simp [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact eraseP_append_left (beq_self_eq_true a) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l₁ : List α} (l₂ : List α) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = (l₁ ++ l₂.erase a) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_append_right]
intros b h' h''; rw [eq_of_beq h''] at h; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP' a l ▸ eraseP_sublist l
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a ⊆ l := (erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem Sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq_eraseP']; exact h.eraseP
@[deprecated] alias sublist.erase := Sublist.erase
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.erase b) : a ∈ l := erase_subset _ _ h
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} {l : List α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP b l ▸ mem_eraseP_of_neg (mt eq_of_beq ab.symm)
theorem erase_comm [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) :
(l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a := by
if ab : a == b then rw [eq_of_beq ab] else ?_
if ha : a ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
if hb : b ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha with
| _, _, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩ =>
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end erase
/-! ### filter and partition -/
@[simp] theorem filter_sublist {p : α → Bool} : ∀ (l : List α), filter p l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => by rw [filter]; split <;> simp [Sublist.cons, Sublist.cons₂, filter_sublist l]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem length_filter_le (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
(l.filter p).length ≤ l.length := (filter_sublist _).length_le
theorem length_filterMap_le (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
(filterMap f l).length ≤ l.length := by
rw [← length_map _ some, map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some, ← length_map _ f]
apply length_filter_le
protected theorem Sublist.filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) :
filterMap f l₁ <+ filterMap f l₂ := by
induction s <;> simp <;> split <;> simp [*, cons, cons₂]
theorem Sublist.filter (p : α → Bool) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter]; apply s.filterMap
@[simp]
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
induction l with simp
| cons a l ih =>
cases h : p a <;> simp [*]
intro h; exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (h ▸ length_filter_le p l)
@[simp]
theorem filter_length_eq_length {l} : (filter p l).length = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
Iff.trans ⟨l.filter_sublist.eq_of_length, congrArg length⟩ filter_eq_self
/-! ### findIdx -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx_nil {α : Type _} (p : α → Bool) : [].findIdx p = 0 := rfl
theorem findIdx_cons (p : α → Bool) (b : α) (l : List α) :
(b :: l).findIdx p = bif p b then 0 else (l.findIdx p) + 1 := by
cases H : p b with
| true => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go]
| false => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go, findIdx_go_succ]
where
findIdx_go_succ (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
List.findIdx.go p l (n + 1) = (findIdx.go p l n) + 1 := by
cases l with
| nil => unfold findIdx.go; exact Nat.succ_eq_add_one n
| cons head tail =>
unfold findIdx.go
cases p head <;> simp only [cond_false, cond_true]
exact findIdx_go_succ p tail (n + 1)
theorem findIdx_of_get?_eq_some {xs : List α} (w : xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some y) : p y := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih => by_cases h : p x <;> simp_all [findIdx_cons]
theorem findIdx_get {xs : List α} {w : xs.findIdx p < xs.length} :
p (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, w⟩) :=
xs.findIdx_of_get?_eq_some (get?_eq_get w)
theorem findIdx_lt_length_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.findIdx p < xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
by_cases p x
· simp_all only [forall_exists_index, and_imp, mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp, true_or,
findIdx_cons, cond_true, length_cons]
apply Nat.succ_pos
· simp_all [findIdx_cons]
refine Nat.succ_lt_succ ?_
obtain ⟨x', m', h'⟩ := h
exact ih x' m' h'
theorem findIdx_get?_eq_get_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, xs.findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h⟩) :=
get?_eq_get (findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h)
/-! ### findIdx? -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_cons :
(x :: xs).findIdx? p i = if p x then some i else findIdx? p xs (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_succ :
(xs : List α).findIdx? p (i+1) = (xs.findIdx? p i).map fun i => i + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing i with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_eq_some_iff (xs : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
xs.findIdx? p = some i ↔ (xs.take (i + 1)).map p = replicate i false ++ [true] := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, take_succ_cons, map_cons]
split <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_some {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = some i) :
match xs.get? i with | some a => p a | none => false := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
split at w <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_none {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = none) :
∀ i, match xs.get? i with | some a => ¬ p a | none => true := by
intro i
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [Bool.not_eq_true, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
cases i with
| zero =>
split at w <;> simp_all
| succ i =>
simp only [get?_cons_succ]
apply ih
split at w <;> simp_all
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_append :
(xs ++ ys : List α).findIdx? p =
(xs.findIdx? p <|> (ys.findIdx? p).map fun i => i + xs.length) := by
induction xs with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all [Option.map_orElse, Option.map_map]; rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_replicate :
(replicate n a).findIdx? p = if 0 < n ∧ p a then some 0 else none := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, Nat.zero_lt_succ, true_and]
split <;> simp_all
/-! ### pairwise -/
theorem Pairwise.sublist : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₂.Pairwise R → l₁.Pairwise R
| .slnil, h => h
| .cons _ s, .cons _ h₂ => h₂.sublist s
| .cons₂ _ s, .cons h₁ h₂ => (h₂.sublist s).cons fun _ h => h₁ _ (s.subset h)
theorem pairwise_map {l : List α} :
(l.map f).Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise fun a b => R (f a) (f b) := by
induction l
· simp
· simp only [map, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_map_iff, *]
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
(l₁ ++ l₂).Pairwise R ↔ l₁.Pairwise R ∧ l₂.Pairwise R ∧ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, R a b := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_imp, forall_and, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
theorem pairwise_reverse {l : List α} :
l.reverse.Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise (fun a b => R b a) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, pairwise_append, and_comm]
theorem Pairwise.imp {α R S} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) :
∀ {l : List α}, l.Pairwise R → l.Pairwise S
| _, .nil => .nil
| _, .cons h₁ h₂ => .cons (H ∘ h₁ ·) (h₂.imp H)
/-! ### replaceF -/
theorem replaceF_nil : [].replaceF p = [] := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = match p a with
| none => a :: replaceF p l
| some a' => a' :: l := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons_of_some {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = some a') :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a' :: l := by
simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_cons_of_none {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = none) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a :: l.replaceF p := by simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_of_forall_none {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → p a = none) : l.replaceF p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_replaceF : ∀ {l : List α} {a a'} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a = some a'),
∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂
| b :: l, a, a', al, pa =>
match pb : p b with
| some b' => ⟨b, b', [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
| none =>
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb.symm.trans pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, c', l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_replaceF al pa
⟨c, c', b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_replaceF (p) (l : List α) :
l.replaceF p = l ∨ ∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, (p a).isSome then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_replaceF ha (Option.get_mem pa))
else
.inl <| replaceF_of_forall_none fun a ha =>
Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.1 fun h' => h ⟨a, ha, h'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_replaceF : length (replaceF f l) = length l := by
induction l <;> simp [replaceF]; split <;> simp [*]
/-! ### disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₂ l₁ := ⟨disjoint_symm, disjoint_symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := by simp [Disjoint]
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ := disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h _ al1 _ bl2 ab => h al1 (ab ▸ bl2), fun h _ al1 al2 => h _ al1 _ al2 rfl⟩
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l l₂) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m => d (ss m)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l₁ l) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m m₁ => d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint (a :: l₁) l₂ → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : List α) : Disjoint [] l := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : List α) : Disjoint l [] := by
rw [disjoint_comm]; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint : Disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l := by simp [Disjoint]
@[simp 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l := by
rw [disjoint_comm, singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l ↔ Disjoint l₁ l ∧ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp [Disjoint, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Disjoint l l₁ ∧ Disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_append_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left : Disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ (a ∉ l₂) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_left (l₁ := [a])).trans <| by simp [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) ↔ (a ∉ l₁) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_cons_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
/-! ### foldl / foldr -/
theorem foldl_hom (f : α₁ → α₂) (g₁ : α₁ → β → α₁) (g₂ : α₂ → β → α₂) (l : List β) (init : α₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ (f x) y = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldl g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldl g₁ init) := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, H]
theorem foldr_hom (f : β₁ → β₂) (g₁ : α → β₁ → β₁) (g₂ : α → β₂ → β₂) (l : List α) (init : β₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ x (f y) = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldr g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldr g₁ init) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, H]
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [BEq α]
theorem union_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ = foldr .insert l₂ l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : List α) : nil ∪ l = l := by simp [List.union_def, foldr]
@[simp] theorem cons_union (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
(a :: l₁) ∪ l₂ = (l₁ ∪ l₂).insert a := by simp [List.union_def, foldr]
@[simp] theorem mem_union_iff [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∨ x ∈ l₂ := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_assoc]
end union
/-! ### inter -/
theorem inter_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ = filter (elem · l₂) l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_iff [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∧ x ∈ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> simp [List.inter_def, mem_filter]
/-! ### product -/
/-- List.prod satisfies a specification of cartesian product on lists. -/
@[simp]
theorem pair_mem_product {xs : List α} {ys : List β} {x : α} {y : β} :
(x, y) ∈ product xs ys ↔ x ∈ xs ∧ y ∈ ys := by
simp only [product, and_imp, mem_map, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right_right, mem_bind, iff_self]
/-! ### leftpad -/
/-- The length of the List returned by `List.leftpad n a l` is equal
to the larger of `n` and `l.length` -/
@[simp]
theorem leftpad_length (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(leftpad n a l).length = max n l.length := by
simp only [leftpad, length_append, length_replicate, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
theorem leftpad_prefix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
replicate (n - length l) a <+: leftpad n a l := by
simp only [IsPrefix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro l rfl
theorem leftpad_suffix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) : l <:+ (leftpad n a l) := by
simp only [IsSuffix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro (replicate (n - length l) a) rfl
/-! ### monadic operations -/
-- we use ForIn.forIn as the simp normal form
@[simp] theorem forIn_eq_forIn [Monad m] : @List.forIn α β m _ = forIn := rfl
theorem forIn_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
(f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) (l : List α) (init : β) :
forIn l init f = ForInStep.run <$> (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f l := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, map_eq_pure_bind]
congr; ext (b | b) <;> simp
@[simp] theorem forM_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (l₁ l₂ : List α) (f : α → m PUnit) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).forM f = (do l₁.forM f; l₂.forM f) := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [BEq α]
variable [LawfulBEq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : List α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := by
simp_all [List.diff, erase_of_not_mem]
theorem diff_cons_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.diff l₂).erase a := by
apply Eq.symm; induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> simp [erase_comm, *]
theorem diff_erase (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : (l₁.diff l₂).erase a = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := by
rw [← diff_cons_right, diff_cons]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : List α) : [].diff l = [] := by
induction l <;> simp [*, erase_of_not_mem]
theorem cons_diff (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
(a :: l₁).diff l₂ = if a ∈ l₂ then l₁.diff (l₂.erase a) else a :: l₁.diff l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ with
| nil => rfl
| cons b l₂ ih =>
by_cases h : a = b
next => simp [*]
next =>
have := Ne.symm h
simp[*]
theorem cons_diff_of_mem {a : α} {l₂ : List α} (h : a ∈ l₂) (l₁ : List α) :
(a :: l₁).diff l₂ = l₁.diff (l₂.erase a) := by rw [cons_diff, if_pos h]
theorem cons_diff_of_not_mem {a : α} {l₂ : List α} (h : a ∉ l₂) (l₁ : List α) :
(a :: l₁).diff l₂ = a :: l₁.diff l₂ := by rw [cons_diff, if_neg h]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁.diff l₂ = foldl List.erase l₁ l₂
| _, [] => rfl
| l₁, a :: l₂ => (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| _, [] => .refl _
| l₁, a :: l₂ =>
calc
l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := diff_cons ..
_ <+ l₁.erase a := diff_sublist ..
_ <+ l₁ := erase_sublist ..
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ := (diff_sublist ..).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| _, [], h₁, _ => h₁
| l₁, b :: l₂, h₁, h₂ => by
rw [diff_cons]
exact mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne <| ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂).2 h₁) (mt (.tail _) h₂)
theorem Sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| _, _, [], h => h
| l₁, l₂, a :: l₃, h => by simp only [diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist {a : α} :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [], l₂, _ => erase_sublist _ _
| b :: l₁, l₂, h => by
if heq : b = a then
simp [heq]
else
simp [heq, erase_comm a]
exact (erase_cons_head b _ ▸ h.erase b).erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) := by
rw [← List.append_assoc]; apply infix_append
theorem IsPrefix.isInfix : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem IsSuffix.isInfix : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨t, [], by rw [h, append_nil]⟩
theorem nil_prefix (l : List α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : List α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
theorem nil_infix (l : List α) : [] <:+: l := (nil_prefix _).isInfix
theorem prefix_refl (l : List α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
theorem suffix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
theorem infix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+: l := (prefix_refl l).isInfix
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem infix_cons : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ => ⟨a :: L₁, L₂, h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem infix_concat : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: concat l₂ a := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ =>
⟨L₁, concat L₂ a, by simp [← h, concat_eq_append, append_assoc]⟩
theorem IsPrefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
theorem IsSuffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨l₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
theorem IsInfix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l, _, _, ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
protected theorem IsInfix.sublist : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ (sublist_append_right ..).trans (sublist_append_left ..)
protected theorem IsInfix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsPrefix.sublist (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsPrefix.subset (hl : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsSuffix.sublist (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsSuffix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
@[simp] theorem reverse_suffix : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem reverse_prefix : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
rw [← reverse_suffix]; simp only [reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem reverse_infix : reverse l₁ <:+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩, fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e,
reverse_reverse]
· rw [append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e]
theorem IsInfix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsPrefix.length_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsSuffix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
@[simp] theorem infix_nil : l <:+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ infix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem prefix_nil : l <+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ prefix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_nil : l <:+ [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ suffix_refl _)⟩
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨_, t, e⟩ => ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, e ▸ append_assoc .. ▸ ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, ⟨t, rfl⟩, s, e⟩ => ⟨s, t, append_assoc .. ▸ e⟩⟩
theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le :
∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [], l₂, _, _, _, _ => nil_prefix _
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, e⟩, ll => by
injection e with _ e'; subst b
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩ (le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(Nat.le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp (prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 <|
prefix_of_prefix_length_le (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix (h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp reverse_prefix.1
reverse_prefix.1
theorem suffix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ = a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl hl₃
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, hl₄⟩
· rintro (rfl | hl₁)
· exact (a :: l₂).suffix_refl
· exact hl₁.trans (l₂.suffix_cons _)
theorem infix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, t, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨t, hl₃⟩
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, t, hl₄⟩
· rintro (h | hl₁)
· exact h.isInfix
· exact infix_cons hl₁
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| l' :: _, h =>
match h with
| List.Mem.head .. => infix_append [] _ _
| List.Mem.tail _ hlMemL =>
IsInfix.trans (infix_of_mem_join hlMemL) <| (suffix_append _ _).isInfix
theorem prefix_append_right_inj (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem prefix_cons_inj (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+: l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <:+ l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem take_sublist (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+ l :=
(take_prefix n l).sublist
theorem drop_sublist (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <+ l :=
(drop_suffix n l).sublist
theorem take_subset (n) (l : List α) : take n l ⊆ l :=
(take_sublist n l).subset
theorem drop_subset (n) (l : List α) : drop n l ⊆ l :=
(drop_sublist n l).subset
theorem mem_of_mem_take {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.take n) : a ∈ l :=
take_subset n l h
theorem IsPrefix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply prefix_append
theorem IsSuffix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+ l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply suffix_append
theorem IsInfix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, ys, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append, filter_append]; apply infix_append _
/-! ### drop -/
theorem mem_of_mem_drop {n} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.drop n) : a ∈ l := drop_subset _ _ h
theorem disjoint_take_drop : ∀ {l : List α}, l.Nodup → m ≤ n → Disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n)
| [], _, _ => by simp
| x :: xs, hl, h => by
cases m <;> cases n <;> simp only [disjoint_cons_left, drop, not_mem_nil, disjoint_nil_left,
take, not_false_eq_true, and_self]
· case succ.zero => cases h
· cases hl with | cons h₀ h₁ =>
refine ⟨fun h => h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, ?_⟩
exact disjoint_take_drop h₁ (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
/-! ### Chain -/
attribute [simp] Chain.nil
@[simp]
theorem chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} : Chain R a (b :: l) ↔ R a b ∧ Chain R b l :=
⟨fun p => by cases p with | cons n p => exact ⟨n, p⟩,
fun ⟨n, p⟩ => p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : Chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem Chain.imp' {R S : α → α → Prop} (HRS : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, R a b → S a b) {a b : α}
(Hab : ∀ ⦃c⦄, R a c → S b c) {l : List α} (p : Chain R a l) : Chain S b l := by
induction p generalizing b with
| nil => constructor
| cons r _ ih =>
constructor
· exact Hab r
· exact ih (@HRS _)
theorem Chain.imp {R S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : List α}
(p : Chain R a l) : Chain S a l :=
p.imp' H (H a)
protected theorem Pairwise.chain (p : Pairwise R (a :: l)) : Chain R a l := by
let ⟨r, p'⟩ := pairwise_cons.1 p; clear p
induction p' generalizing a with
| nil => exact Chain.nil
| @cons b l r' _ IH =>
simp only [chain_cons, forall_mem_cons] at r
exact chain_cons.2 ⟨r.1, IH r'⟩
/-! ### range', range -/
@[simp] theorem length_range' (s step) : ∀ n : Nat, length (range' s n step) = n
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => congrArg succ (length_range' _ _ _)
@[simp] theorem range'_eq_nil : range' s n step = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_range']
theorem mem_range' : ∀{n}, m ∈ range' s n step ↔ ∃ i < n, m = s + step * i
| 0 => by simp [range', Nat.not_lt_zero]
| n + 1 => by
have h (i) : i ≤ n ↔ i = 0 ∨ ∃ j, i = succ j ∧ j < n := by cases i <;> simp [Nat.succ_le]
simp [range', mem_range', Nat.lt_succ, h]; simp only [← exists_and_right, and_assoc]
rw [exists_comm]; simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem mem_range'_1 : m ∈ range' s n ↔ s ≤ m ∧ m < s + n := by
simp [mem_range']; exact ⟨
fun ⟨i, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨Nat.le_add_right .., Nat.add_lt_add_left h _⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨m - s, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂, (Nat.add_sub_cancel' h₁).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_add_range' (a) : ∀ s n step, map (a + ·) (range' s n step) = range' (a + s) n step
| _, 0, _ => rfl
| s, n + 1, step => by simp [range', map_add_range' _ (s + step) n step, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem map_sub_range' (a s n : Nat) (h : a ≤ s) :
map (· - a) (range' s n step) = range' (s - a) n step := by
conv => lhs; rw [← Nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
rw [← map_add_range', map_map, (?_ : _∘_ = _), map_id]
funext x; apply Nat.add_sub_cancel_left
theorem chain_succ_range' : ∀ s n step : Nat,
Chain (fun a b => b = a + step) s (range' (s + step) n step)
| _, 0, _ => Chain.nil
| s, n + 1, step => (chain_succ_range' (s + step) n step).cons rfl
theorem chain_lt_range' (s n : Nat) {step} (h : 0 < step) :
Chain (· < ·) s (range' (s + step) n step) :=
(chain_succ_range' s n step).imp fun _ _ e => e.symm ▸ Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right h
theorem range'_append : ∀ s m n step : Nat,
range' s m step ++ range' (s + step * m) n step = range' s (n + m) step
| s, 0, n, step => rfl
| s, m + 1, n, step => by
simpa [range', Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
using range'_append (s + step) m n step
@[simp] theorem range'_append_1 (s m n : Nat) :
range' s m ++ range' (s + m) n = range' s (n + m) := by simpa using range'_append s m n 1
theorem range'_sublist_right {s m n : Nat} : range' s m step <+ range' s n step ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [length_range'] using h.length_le,
fun h => by rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, ← range'_append]; apply sublist_append_left⟩
theorem range'_subset_right {s m n : Nat} (step0 : 0 < step) :
range' s m step ⊆ range' s n step ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => Nat.le_of_not_lt fun hn => ?_, fun h => (range'_sublist_right.2 h).subset⟩
have ⟨i, h', e⟩ := mem_range'.1 <| h <| mem_range'.2 ⟨_, hn, rfl⟩
exact Nat.ne_of_gt h' (Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left step0 (Nat.add_left_cancel e))
theorem range'_subset_right_1 {s m n : Nat} : range' s m ⊆ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
range'_subset_right (by decide)
theorem get?_range' (s step) : ∀ {m n : Nat}, m < n → get? (range' s n step) m = some (s + step * m)
| 0, n + 1, _ => rfl
| m + 1, n + 1, h =>
(get?_range' (s + step) step (Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right h)).trans <| by
simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem get_range' {n m step} (i) (H : i < (range' n m step).length) :
get (range' n m step) ⟨i, H⟩ = n + step * i :=
(get?_eq_some.1 <| get?_range' n step (by simpa using H)).2
theorem range'_concat (s n : Nat) : range' s (n + 1) step = range' s n step ++ [s + step * n] := by
rw [Nat.add_comm n 1]; exact (range'_append s n 1 step).symm
theorem range'_1_concat (s n : Nat) : range' s (n + 1) = range' s n ++ [s + n] := by
simp [range'_concat]
theorem range_loop_range' : ∀ s n : Nat, range.loop s (range' s n) = range' 0 (n + s)
| 0, n => rfl
| s + 1, n => by rw [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm n s 1]; exact range_loop_range' s (n + 1)
theorem range_eq_range' (n : Nat) : range n = range' 0 n :=
(range_loop_range' n 0).trans <| by rw [Nat.zero_add]
theorem range_succ_eq_map (n : Nat) : range (n + 1) = 0 :: map succ (range n) := by
rw [range_eq_range', range_eq_range', range', Nat.add_comm, ← map_add_range']
congr; exact funext one_add
theorem range'_eq_map_range (s n : Nat) : range' s n = map (s + ·) (range n) := by
rw [range_eq_range', map_add_range']; rfl
@[simp] theorem length_range (n : Nat) : length (range n) = n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', length_range']
@[simp] theorem range_eq_nil {n : Nat} : range n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_range]
@[simp]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 1,371 | 1,372 | theorem range_sublist {m n : Nat} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n := by |
simp only [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jalex Stark. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jalex Stark, Scott Morrison, Eric Wieser, Oliver Nash, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
#align_import data.matrix.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"320df450e9abeb5fc6417971e75acb6ae8bc3794"
/-!
# Matrices with a single non-zero element.
This file provides `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix`. The matrix `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c` has `c`
at position `(i, j)`, and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
variable {l m n : Type*}
variable {R α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Matrix
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
variable [Semiring α]
/-- `stdBasisMatrix i j a` is the matrix with `a` in the `i`-th row, `j`-th column,
and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
def stdBasisMatrix (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) : Matrix m n α := fun i' j' =>
if i = i' ∧ j = j' then a else 0
#align matrix.std_basis_matrix Matrix.stdBasisMatrix
@[simp]
theorem smul_stdBasisMatrix [SMulZeroClass R α] (r : R) (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) :
r • stdBasisMatrix i j a = stdBasisMatrix i j (r • a) := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp [smul_ite]
#align matrix.smul_std_basis_matrix Matrix.smul_stdBasisMatrix
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basis.lean | 45 | 48 | theorem stdBasisMatrix_zero (i : m) (j : n) : stdBasisMatrix i j (0 : α) = 0 := by |
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_mod self_sub_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ico_div_zsmul toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ioc_div_zsmul toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ico_mod toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ioc_mod toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_iff toIcoMod_eq_iff
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_iff toIocMod_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_left toIcoDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_left toIocDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_left toIcoMod_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_left toIocMod_apply_left
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_right toIcoDiv_apply_right
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_right toIocDiv_apply_right
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_right toIcoMod_apply_right
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_right toIocMod_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul toIcoDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul' toIcoDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul toIocDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul' toIocDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_add toIcoDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_add toIocDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul' toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul toIocDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul' toIocDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right toIcoDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right' toIcoDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right toIocDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right' toIocDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ico_div_add_left toIcoDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ico_div_add_left' toIcoDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left toIocDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left' toIocDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub toIcoDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub' toIcoDiv_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub toIocDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub' toIocDiv_sub'
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add' toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add'
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add' toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add'
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
#align to_Ico_div_neg toIcoDiv_neg
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ico_div_neg' toIcoDiv_neg'
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_neg toIocDiv_neg
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ioc_div_neg' toIocDiv_neg'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul toIcoMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul' toIcoMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul toIocMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul' toIocMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 431 | 432 | theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by |
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.GroupCat.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.ReflectsIso
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv
#align_import algebra.category.Ring.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"34b2a989ad80bce3a5de749d935a4f23726e26e9"
/-!
# Category instances for `Semiring`, `Ring`, `CommSemiring`, and `CommRing`.
We introduce the bundled categories:
* `SemiRingCat`
* `RingCat`
* `CommSemiRingCat`
* `CommRingCat`
along with the relevant forgetful functors between them.
-/
universe u v
open CategoryTheory
/-- The category of semirings. -/
abbrev SemiRingCat : Type (u + 1) :=
Bundled Semiring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing SemiRingCat
-- Porting note: typemax hack to fix universe complaints
/-- An alias for `Semiring.{max u v}`, to deal around unification issues. -/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
abbrev SemiRingCatMax.{u1, u2} := SemiRingCat.{max u1 u2}
namespace SemiRingCat
/-- `RingHom` doesn't actually assume associativity. This alias is needed to make the category
theory machinery work. We use the same trick in `MonCat.AssocMonoidHom`. -/
abbrev AssocRingHom (M N : Type*) [Semiring M] [Semiring N] :=
RingHom M N
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.assoc_ring_hom SemiRingCat.AssocRingHom
instance bundledHom : BundledHom AssocRingHom where
toFun _ _ f := f
id _ := RingHom.id _
comp _ _ _ f g := f.comp g
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.bundled_hom SemiRingCat.bundledHom
-- Porting note: deriving fails for ConcreteCategory, adding instance manually.
--deriving instance LargeCategory, ConcreteCategory for SemiRingCat
-- see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
-- Porting note: Hinting to Lean that `forget R` and `R` are the same
unif_hint forget_obj_eq_coe (R : SemiRingCat) where ⊢
(forget SemiRingCat).obj R ≟ R
instance instSemiring (X : SemiRingCat) : Semiring X := X.str
instance instFunLike {X Y : SemiRingCat} : FunLike (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance instRingHomClass {X Y : SemiRingCat} : RingHomClass (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
RingHom.instRingHomClass
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_id {X : SemiRingCat} : (𝟙 X : X → X) = id := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_comp {X Y Z : SemiRingCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g : X → Z) = g ∘ f := rfl
-- porting note (#10756): added lemma
@[simp] lemma forget_map {X Y : SemiRingCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(forget SemiRingCat).map f = (f : X → Y) := rfl
lemma ext {X Y : SemiRingCat} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ x : X, f x = g x) : f = g :=
RingHom.ext w
/-- Construct a bundled SemiRing from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [Semiring R] : SemiRingCat :=
Bundled.of R
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.of SemiRingCat.of
@[simp]
theorem coe_of (R : Type u) [Semiring R] : (SemiRingCat.of R : Type u) = R :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.coe_of SemiRingCat.coe_of
-- Coercing the identity morphism, as a ring homomorphism, gives the identity function.
@[simp] theorem coe_ringHom_id {X : SemiRingCat} :
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (𝟙 X) = id :=
rfl
-- Coercing `𝟙 (of X)` to a function should be expressed as the coercion of `RingHom.id X`.
@[simp] theorem coe_id_of {X : Type u} [Semiring X] :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (SemiRingCat.of X ⟶ SemiRingCat.of X) X
(fun _ ↦ X) _
(𝟙 (of X)) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (RingHom.id X) :=
rfl
-- Coercing `f ≫ g`, where `f : of X ⟶ of Y` and `g : of Y ⟶ of Z`, to a function should be
-- expressed in terms of the coercion of `g.comp f`.
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_of {X Y Z : Type u} [Semiring X] [Semiring Y] [Semiring Z]
(f : X →+* Y) (g : Y →+* Z) :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (SemiRingCat.of X ⟶ SemiRingCat.of Z) X
(fun _ ↦ Z) _
(CategoryStruct.comp (X := SemiRingCat.of X) (Y := SemiRingCat.of Y) (Z := SemiRingCat.of Z)
f g) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* Z) X (fun _ ↦ Z) _ (RingHom.comp g f) :=
rfl
-- Sometimes neither the `ext` lemma for `SemiRingCat` nor for `RingHom` is applicable,
-- because of incomplete unfolding of `SemiRingCat.of X ⟶ SemiRingCat.of Y := X →+* Y`,
-- but this one will fire.
@[ext] theorem ext_of {X Y : Type u} [Semiring X] [Semiring Y] (f g : X →+* Y)
(h : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
@Eq (SemiRingCat.of X ⟶ SemiRingCat.of Y) f g :=
RingHom.ext h
@[simp]
lemma RingEquiv_coe_eq {X Y : Type _} [Semiring X] [Semiring Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) :
(@DFunLike.coe (SemiRingCat.of X ⟶ SemiRingCat.of Y) _ (fun _ => (forget SemiRingCat).obj _)
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike (e : X →+* Y) : X → Y) = ↑e :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited SemiRingCat :=
⟨of PUnit⟩
instance hasForgetToMonCat : HasForget₂ SemiRingCat MonCat :=
BundledHom.mkHasForget₂
(fun R hR => @MonoidWithZero.toMonoid R (@Semiring.toMonoidWithZero R hR))
(fun {_ _} => RingHom.toMonoidHom)
(fun _ => rfl)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.has_forget_to_Mon SemiRingCat.hasForgetToMonCat
instance hasForgetToAddCommMonCat : HasForget₂ SemiRingCat AddCommMonCat where
-- can't use BundledHom.mkHasForget₂, since AddCommMon is an induced category
forget₂ :=
{ obj := fun R => AddCommMonCat.of R
-- Porting note: This doesn't work without the `(_ := _)` trick.
map := fun {R₁ R₂} f => RingHom.toAddMonoidHom (α := R₁) (β := R₂) f }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.has_forget_to_AddCommMon SemiRingCat.hasForgetToAddCommMonCat
/-- Typecheck a `RingHom` as a morphism in `SemiRingCat`. -/
def ofHom {R S : Type u} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) : of R ⟶ of S :=
f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.of_hom SemiRingCat.ofHom
-- Porting note: `simpNF` should not trigger on `rfl` lemmas.
-- see https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/86
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem ofHom_apply {R S : Type u} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : R) :
ofHom f x = f x :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiRing.of_hom_apply SemiRingCat.ofHom_apply
/--
Ring equivalence are isomorphisms in category of semirings
-/
@[simps]
def _root_.RingEquiv.toSemiRingCatIso {X Y : Type u} [Semiring X] [Semiring Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) :
SemiRingCat.of X ≅ SemiRingCat.of Y where
hom := e.toRingHom
inv := e.symm.toRingHom
instance forgetReflectIsos : (forget SemiRingCat).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects {X Y} f _ := by
let i := asIso ((forget SemiRingCat).map f)
let ff : X →+* Y := f
let e : X ≃+* Y := { ff, i.toEquiv with }
exact e.toSemiRingCatIso.isIso_hom
end SemiRingCat
/-- The category of rings. -/
abbrev RingCat : Type (u + 1) :=
Bundled Ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Ring RingCat
namespace RingCat
instance : BundledHom.ParentProjection @Ring.toSemiring :=
⟨⟩
-- Porting note: Another place where mathlib had derived a concrete category
-- but this does not work here, so we add the instance manually.
-- see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
instance (X : RingCat) : Ring X := X.str
-- Porting note: Hinting to Lean that `forget R` and `R` are the same
unif_hint forget_obj_eq_coe (R : RingCat) where ⊢
(forget RingCat).obj R ≟ R
instance instRing (X : RingCat) : Ring X := X.str
instance instFunLike {X Y : RingCat} : FunLike (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
-- Note: this is apparently _not_ defeq to RingHom.instFunLike with reducible transparency
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance instRingHomClass {X Y : RingCat} : RingHomClass (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
RingHom.instRingHomClass
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_id {X : RingCat} : (𝟙 X : X → X) = id := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_comp {X Y Z : RingCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g : X → Z) = g ∘ f := rfl
-- porting note (#10756): added lemma
@[simp] lemma forget_map {X Y : RingCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (forget RingCat).map f = (f : X → Y) := rfl
lemma ext {X Y : RingCat} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ x : X, f x = g x) : f = g :=
RingHom.ext w
/-- Construct a bundled `RingCat` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [Ring R] : RingCat :=
Bundled.of R
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Ring.of RingCat.of
/-- Typecheck a `RingHom` as a morphism in `RingCat`. -/
def ofHom {R S : Type u} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) : of R ⟶ of S :=
f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Ring.of_hom RingCat.ofHom
-- Porting note: I think this is now redundant.
-- @[simp]
-- theorem ofHom_apply {R S : Type u} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : R) : ofHom f x = f x :=
-- rfl
-- set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
-- #align Ring.of_hom_apply RingCat.ofHom_apply
instance : Inhabited RingCat :=
⟨of PUnit⟩
instance (R : RingCat) : Ring R :=
R.str
@[simp]
theorem coe_of (R : Type u) [Ring R] : (RingCat.of R : Type u) = R :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Ring.coe_of RingCat.coe_of
-- Coercing the identity morphism, as a ring homomorphism, gives the identity function.
@[simp] theorem coe_ringHom_id {X : RingCat} :
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (𝟙 X) = id :=
rfl
-- Coercing `𝟙 (of X)` to a function should be expressed as the coercion of `RingHom.id X`.
@[simp] theorem coe_id_of {X : Type u} [Ring X] :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (RingCat.of X ⟶ RingCat.of X) X
(fun _ ↦ X) _
(𝟙 (of X)) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (RingHom.id X) :=
rfl
-- Coercing `f ≫ g`, where `f : of X ⟶ of Y` and `g : of Y ⟶ of Z`, to a function should be
-- expressed in terms of the coercion of `g.comp f`.
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_of {X Y Z : Type u} [Ring X] [Ring Y] [Ring Z]
(f : X →+* Y) (g : Y →+* Z) :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (RingCat.of X ⟶ RingCat.of Z) X
(fun _ ↦ Z) _
(CategoryStruct.comp (X := RingCat.of X) (Y := RingCat.of Y) (Z := RingCat.of Z)
f g) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* Z) X (fun _ ↦ Z) _ (RingHom.comp g f) :=
rfl
-- Sometimes neither the `ext` lemma for `RingCat` nor for `RingHom` is applicable,
-- because of incomplete unfolding of `RingCat.of X ⟶ RingCat.of Y := X →+* Y`,
-- but this one will fire.
@[ext] theorem ext_of {X Y : Type u} [Ring X] [Ring Y] (f g : X →+* Y)
(h : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
@Eq (RingCat.of X ⟶ RingCat.of Y) f g :=
RingHom.ext h
@[simp]
lemma RingEquiv_coe_eq {X Y : Type _} [Ring X] [Ring Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) :
(@DFunLike.coe (RingCat.of X ⟶ RingCat.of Y) _ (fun _ => (forget RingCat).obj _)
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike (e : X →+* Y) : X → Y) = ↑e :=
rfl
instance hasForgetToSemiRingCat : HasForget₂ RingCat SemiRingCat :=
BundledHom.forget₂ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Ring.has_forget_to_SemiRing RingCat.hasForgetToSemiRingCat
instance hasForgetToAddCommGroupCat : HasForget₂ RingCat AddCommGroupCat where
-- can't use BundledHom.mkHasForget₂, since AddCommGroup is an induced category
forget₂ :=
{ obj := fun R => AddCommGroupCat.of R
-- Porting note: use `(_ := _)` similar to above.
map := fun {R₁ R₂} f => RingHom.toAddMonoidHom (α := R₁) (β := R₂) f }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Ring.has_forget_to_AddCommGroup RingCat.hasForgetToAddCommGroupCat
end RingCat
/-- The category of commutative semirings. -/
def CommSemiRingCat : Type (u + 1) :=
Bundled CommSemiring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommSemiRing CommSemiRingCat
namespace CommSemiRingCat
instance : BundledHom.ParentProjection @CommSemiring.toSemiring :=
⟨⟩
-- Porting note: again, deriving fails for concrete category instances.
-- see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
deriving instance LargeCategory for CommSemiRingCat
instance : ConcreteCategory CommSemiRingCat := by
dsimp [CommSemiRingCat]
infer_instance
instance : CoeSort CommSemiRingCat Type* where
coe X := X.α
instance (X : CommSemiRingCat) : CommSemiring X := X.str
-- Porting note: Hinting to Lean that `forget R` and `R` are the same
unif_hint forget_obj_eq_coe (R : CommSemiRingCat) where ⊢
(forget CommSemiRingCat).obj R ≟ R
instance instCommSemiring (X : CommSemiRingCat) : CommSemiring X := X.str
instance instCommSemiring' (X : CommSemiRingCat) : CommSemiring <| (forget CommSemiRingCat).obj X :=
X.str
instance instFunLike {X Y : CommSemiRingCat} : FunLike (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
-- Note: this is apparently _not_ defeq to RingHom.instFunLike with reducible transparency
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance instRingHomClass {X Y : CommSemiRingCat} : RingHomClass (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
RingHom.instRingHomClass
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_id {X : CommSemiRingCat} : (𝟙 X : X → X) = id := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_comp {X Y Z : CommSemiRingCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g : X → Z) = g ∘ f := rfl
-- porting note (#10756): added lemma
@[simp] lemma forget_map {X Y : CommSemiRingCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(forget CommSemiRingCat).map f = (f : X → Y) := rfl
lemma ext {X Y : CommSemiRingCat} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ x : X, f x = g x) : f = g :=
RingHom.ext w
/-- Construct a bundled `CommSemiRingCat` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiRingCat :=
Bundled.of R
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommSemiRing.of CommSemiRingCat.of
/-- Typecheck a `RingHom` as a morphism in `CommSemiRingCat`. -/
def ofHom {R S : Type u} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) : of R ⟶ of S :=
f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommSemiRing.of_hom CommSemiRingCat.ofHom
@[simp]
lemma RingEquiv_coe_eq {X Y : Type _} [CommSemiring X] [CommSemiring Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) :
(@DFunLike.coe (CommSemiRingCat.of X ⟶ CommSemiRingCat.of Y) _
(fun _ => (forget CommSemiRingCat).obj _)
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike (e : X →+* Y) : X → Y) = ↑e :=
rfl
-- Porting note: I think this is now redundant.
-- @[simp]
-- theorem ofHom_apply {R S : Type u} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : R) :
-- ofHom f x = f x :=
-- rfl
-- set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#noalign CommSemiRing.of_hom_apply
instance : Inhabited CommSemiRingCat :=
⟨of PUnit⟩
instance (R : CommSemiRingCat) : CommSemiring R :=
R.str
@[simp]
theorem coe_of (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] : (CommSemiRingCat.of R : Type u) = R :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommSemiRing.coe_of CommSemiRingCat.coe_of
-- Coercing the identity morphism, as a ring homomorphism, gives the identity function.
@[simp] theorem coe_ringHom_id {X : CommSemiRingCat} :
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (𝟙 X) = id :=
rfl
-- Coercing `𝟙 (of X)` to a function should be expressed as the coercion of `RingHom.id X`.
@[simp] theorem coe_id_of {X : Type u} [CommSemiring X] :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (CommSemiRingCat.of X ⟶ CommSemiRingCat.of X) X
(fun _ ↦ X) _
(𝟙 (of X)) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (RingHom.id X) :=
rfl
-- Coercing `f ≫ g`, where `f : of X ⟶ of Y` and `g : of Y ⟶ of Z`, to a function should be
-- expressed in terms of the coercion of `g.comp f`.
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_of {X Y Z : Type u} [CommSemiring X] [CommSemiring Y] [CommSemiring Z]
(f : X →+* Y) (g : Y →+* Z) :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (CommSemiRingCat.of X ⟶ CommSemiRingCat.of Z) X
(fun _ ↦ Z) _
(CategoryStruct.comp (X := CommSemiRingCat.of X) (Y := CommSemiRingCat.of Y)
(Z := CommSemiRingCat.of Z) f g) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* Z) X (fun _ ↦ Z) _ (RingHom.comp g f) :=
rfl
-- Sometimes neither the `ext` lemma for `CommSemiRingCat` nor for `RingHom` is applicable,
-- because of incomplete unfolding of `CommSemiRingCat.of X ⟶ CommSemiRingCat.of Y := X →+* Y`,
-- but this one will fire.
@[ext] theorem ext_of {X Y : Type u} [CommSemiring X] [CommSemiring Y] (f g : X →+* Y)
(h : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
@Eq (CommSemiRingCat.of X ⟶ CommSemiRingCat.of Y) f g :=
RingHom.ext h
instance hasForgetToSemiRingCat : HasForget₂ CommSemiRingCat SemiRingCat :=
BundledHom.forget₂ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommSemiRing.has_forget_to_SemiRing CommSemiRingCat.hasForgetToSemiRingCat
/-- The forgetful functor from commutative rings to (multiplicative) commutative monoids. -/
instance hasForgetToCommMonCat : HasForget₂ CommSemiRingCat CommMonCat :=
HasForget₂.mk' (fun R : CommSemiRingCat => CommMonCat.of R) (fun R => rfl)
-- Porting note: `(_ := _)` trick
(fun {R₁ R₂} f => RingHom.toMonoidHom (α := R₁) (β := R₂) f) (by rfl)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommSemiRing.has_forget_to_CommMon CommSemiRingCat.hasForgetToCommMonCat
/--
Ring equivalence are isomorphisms in category of commutative semirings
-/
@[simps]
def _root_.RingEquiv.toCommSemiRingCatIso {X Y : Type u} [CommSemiring X] [CommSemiring Y]
(e : X ≃+* Y) : CommSemiRingCat.of X ≅ CommSemiRingCat.of Y where
hom := e.toRingHom
inv := e.symm.toRingHom
instance forgetReflectIsos : (forget CommSemiRingCat).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects {X Y} f _ := by
let i := asIso ((forget CommSemiRingCat).map f)
let ff : X →+* Y := f
let e : X ≃+* Y := { ff, i.toEquiv with }
exact ⟨e.toSemiRingCatIso.isIso_hom.1⟩
end CommSemiRingCat
/-- The category of commutative rings. -/
def CommRingCat : Type (u + 1) :=
Bundled CommRing
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommRing CommRingCat
namespace CommRingCat
instance : BundledHom.ParentProjection @CommRing.toRing :=
⟨⟩
-- Porting note: deriving fails for concrete category.
-- see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
deriving instance LargeCategory for CommRingCat
instance : ConcreteCategory CommRingCat := by
dsimp [CommRingCat]
infer_instance
instance : CoeSort CommRingCat Type* where
coe X := X.α
-- Porting note: Hinting to Lean that `forget R` and `R` are the same
unif_hint forget_obj_eq_coe (R : CommRingCat) where ⊢
(forget CommRingCat).obj R ≟ R
instance instCommRing (X : CommRingCat) : CommRing X := X.str
instance instCommRing' (X : CommRingCat) : CommRing <| (forget CommRingCat).obj X := X.str
instance instFunLike {X Y : CommRingCat} : FunLike (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
-- Note: this is apparently _not_ defeq to RingHom.instFunLike with reducible transparency
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance instRingHomClass {X Y : CommRingCat} : RingHomClass (X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
RingHom.instRingHomClass
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_id {X : CommRingCat} : (𝟙 X : X → X) = id := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): added lemma
lemma coe_comp {X Y Z : CommRingCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g : X → Z) = g ∘ f := rfl
-- porting note (#10756): added lemma
@[simp] lemma forget_map {X Y : CommRingCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(forget CommRingCat).map f = (f : X → Y) := rfl
lemma ext {X Y : CommRingCat} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ x : X, f x = g x) : f = g :=
RingHom.ext w
/-- Construct a bundled `CommRingCat` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [CommRing R] : CommRingCat :=
Bundled.of R
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommRing.of CommRingCat.of
instance instFunLike' {X : Type*} [CommRing X] {Y : CommRingCat} :
FunLike (CommRingCat.of X ⟶ Y) X Y :=
-- Note: this is apparently _not_ defeq to RingHom.instFunLike with reducible transparency
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
instance instFunLike'' {X : CommRingCat} {Y : Type*} [CommRing Y] :
FunLike (X ⟶ CommRingCat.of Y) X Y :=
-- Note: this is apparently _not_ defeq to RingHom.instFunLike with reducible transparency
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
instance instFunLike''' {X Y : Type _} [CommRing X] [CommRing Y] :
FunLike (CommRingCat.of X ⟶ CommRingCat.of Y) X Y :=
-- Note: this is apparently _not_ defeq to RingHom.instFunLike with reducible transparency
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
/-- Typecheck a `RingHom` as a morphism in `CommRingCat`. -/
def ofHom {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S) : of R ⟶ of S :=
f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommRing.of_hom CommRingCat.ofHom
@[simp]
lemma RingEquiv_coe_eq {X Y : Type _} [CommRing X] [CommRing Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) :
(@DFunLike.coe (CommRingCat.of X ⟶ CommRingCat.of Y) _ (fun _ => (forget CommRingCat).obj _)
ConcreteCategory.instFunLike (e : X →+* Y) : X → Y) = ↑e :=
rfl
-- Porting note: I think this is now redundant.
-- @[simp]
-- theorem ofHom_apply {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S) (x : R) :
-- ofHom f x = f x :=
-- rfl
-- set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#noalign CommRing.of_hom_apply
instance : Inhabited CommRingCat :=
⟨of PUnit⟩
instance (R : CommRingCat) : CommRing R :=
R.str
@[simp]
theorem coe_of (R : Type u) [CommRing R] : (CommRingCat.of R : Type u) = R :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommRing.coe_of CommRingCat.coe_of
-- Coercing the identity morphism, as a ring homomorphism, gives the identity function.
@[simp] theorem coe_ringHom_id {X : CommRingCat} :
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (𝟙 X) = id :=
rfl
-- Coercing `𝟙 (of X)` to a function should be expressed as the coercion of `RingHom.id X`.
@[simp] theorem coe_id_of {X : Type u} [CommRing X] :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (CommRingCat.of X ⟶ CommRingCat.of X) X
(fun _ ↦ X) _
(𝟙 (of X)) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* X) X (fun _ ↦ X) _ (RingHom.id X) :=
rfl
-- Coercing `f ≫ g`, where `f : of X ⟶ of Y` and `g : of Y ⟶ of Z`, to a function should be
-- expressed in terms of the coercion of `g.comp f`.
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_of {X Y Z : Type u} [CommRing X] [CommRing Y] [CommRing Z]
(f : X →+* Y) (g : Y →+* Z) :
@DFunLike.coe no_index (CommRingCat.of X ⟶ CommRingCat.of Z) X
(fun _ ↦ Z) _
(CategoryStruct.comp (X := CommRingCat.of X) (Y := CommRingCat.of Y) (Z := CommRingCat.of Z)
f g) =
@DFunLike.coe (X →+* Z) X (fun _ ↦ Z) _ (RingHom.comp g f) :=
rfl
-- Sometimes neither the `ext` lemma for `CommRingCat` nor for `RingHom` is applicable,
-- because of incomplete unfolding of `CommRingCat.of X ⟶ CommRingCat.of Y := X →+* Y`,
-- but this one will fire.
@[ext] theorem ext_of {X Y : Type u} [CommRing X] [CommRing Y] (f g : X →+* Y)
(h : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
@Eq (CommRingCat.of X ⟶ CommRingCat.of Y) f g :=
RingHom.ext h
instance hasForgetToRingCat : HasForget₂ CommRingCat RingCat :=
BundledHom.forget₂ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommRing.has_forget_to_Ring CommRingCat.hasForgetToRingCat
/-- The forgetful functor from commutative rings to (multiplicative) commutative monoids. -/
instance hasForgetToCommSemiRingCat : HasForget₂ CommRingCat CommSemiRingCat :=
HasForget₂.mk' (fun R : CommRingCat => CommSemiRingCat.of R) (fun R => rfl)
(fun {R₁ R₂} f => f) (by rfl)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CommRing.has_forget_to_CommSemiRing CommRingCat.hasForgetToCommSemiRingCat
instance : (forget₂ CommRingCat CommSemiRingCat).Full where map_surjective f := ⟨f, rfl⟩
end CommRingCat
-- We verify that simp lemmas apply when coercing morphisms to functions.
example {R S : CommRingCat} (i : R ⟶ S) (r : R) (h : r = 0) : i r = 0 := by simp [h]
namespace RingEquiv
variable {X Y : Type u}
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `RingCat` from a `RingEquiv` between `RingCat`s. -/
@[simps]
def toRingCatIso [Ring X] [Ring Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) : RingCat.of X ≅ RingCat.of Y where
hom := e.toRingHom
inv := e.symm.toRingHom
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ring_equiv.to_Ring_iso RingEquiv.toRingCatIso
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `CommRingCat` from a `RingEquiv` between `CommRingCat`s. -/
@[simps]
def toCommRingCatIso [CommRing X] [CommRing Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) :
CommRingCat.of X ≅ CommRingCat.of Y where
hom := e.toRingHom
inv := e.symm.toRingHom
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ring_equiv.to_CommRing_iso RingEquiv.toCommRingCatIso
end RingEquiv
namespace CategoryTheory.Iso
/-- Build a `RingEquiv` from an isomorphism in the category `RingCat`. -/
def ringCatIsoToRingEquiv {X Y : RingCat} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃+* Y :=
RingEquiv.ofHomInv i.hom i.inv i.hom_inv_id i.inv_hom_id
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.iso.Ring_iso_to_ring_equiv CategoryTheory.Iso.ringCatIsoToRingEquiv
/-- Build a `RingEquiv` from an isomorphism in the category `CommRingCat`. -/
def commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv {X Y : CommRingCat} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃+* Y :=
RingEquiv.ofHomInv i.hom i.inv i.hom_inv_id i.inv_hom_id
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.iso.CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv CategoryTheory.Iso.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv
-- Porting note: make this high priority to short circuit simplifier
@[simp (high)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Ring/Basic.lean | 665 | 668 | theorem commRingIsoToRingEquiv_toRingHom {X Y : CommRingCat} (i : X ≅ Y) :
i.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.toRingHom = i.hom := by |
ext
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Ralf Stephan, Neil Strickland, Ruben Van de Velde
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Positive.Ring
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
#align_import data.pnat.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"172bf2812857f5e56938cc148b7a539f52f84ca9"
/-!
# The positive natural numbers
This file develops the type `ℕ+` or `PNat`, the subtype of natural numbers that are positive.
It is defined in `Data.PNat.Defs`, but most of the development is deferred to here so
that `Data.PNat.Defs` can have very few imports.
-/
deriving instance AddLeftCancelSemigroup, AddRightCancelSemigroup, AddCommSemigroup,
LinearOrderedCancelCommMonoid, Add, Mul, Distrib for PNat
namespace PNat
-- Porting note: this instance is no longer automatically inferred in Lean 4.
instance instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT ℕ+ := WellFoundedRelation.isWellFounded
instance instIsWellOrder : IsWellOrder ℕ+ (· < ·) where
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Basic.lean | 33 | 34 | theorem one_add_natPred (n : ℕ+) : 1 + n.natPred = n := by |
rw [natPred, add_tsub_cancel_iff_le.mpr <| show 1 ≤ (n : ℕ) from n.2]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Update
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.TProd
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
#align_import measure_theory.measurable_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"001ffdc42920050657fd45bd2b8bfbec8eaaeb29"
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file provides properties of measurable spaces and the functions and isomorphisms between them.
The definition of a measurable space is in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Defs.lean`.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of
subsets closed under complementation and countable union. A function
between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of each
measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order
σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂` if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is
also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`). In particular, any
collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which
contains all of them. A function `f : α → β` induces a Galois connection
between the lattices of σ-algebras on `α` and `β`.
A measurable equivalence between measurable spaces is an equivalence
which respects the σ-algebras, that is, for which both directions of
the equivalence are measurable functions.
We say that a filter `f` is measurably generated if every set `s ∈ f` includes a measurable
set `t ∈ f`. This property is useful, e.g., to extract a measurable witness of `Filter.Eventually`.
## Notation
* We write `α ≃ᵐ β` for measurable equivalences between the measurable spaces `α` and `β`.
This should not be confused with `≃ₘ` which is used for diffeomorphisms between manifolds.
## Implementation notes
Measurability of a function `f : α → β` between measurable spaces is
defined in terms of the Galois connection induced by f.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function, measurable equivalence, dynkin system,
π-λ theorem, π-system
-/
open Set Encodable Function Equiv Filter MeasureTheory
universe uι
variable {α β γ δ δ' : Type*} {ι : Sort uι} {s t u : Set α}
namespace MeasurableSpace
section Functors
variable {m m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace α} {m' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- The forward image of a measurable space under a function. `map f m` contains the sets
`s : Set β` whose preimage under `f` is measurable. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace α) : MeasurableSpace β where
MeasurableSet' s := MeasurableSet[m] <| f ⁻¹' s
measurableSet_empty := m.measurableSet_empty
measurableSet_compl s hs := m.measurableSet_compl _ hs
measurableSet_iUnion f hf := by simpa only [preimage_iUnion] using m.measurableSet_iUnion _ hf
#align measurable_space.map MeasurableSpace.map
lemma map_def {s : Set β} : MeasurableSet[m.map f] s ↔ MeasurableSet[m] (f ⁻¹' s) := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : m.map id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
#align measurable_space.map_id MeasurableSpace.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (m.map f).map g = m.map (g ∘ f) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
#align measurable_space.map_comp MeasurableSpace.map_comp
/-- The reverse image of a measurable space under a function. `comap f m` contains the sets
`s : Set α` such that `s` is the `f`-preimage of a measurable set in `β`. -/
protected def comap (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace β) : MeasurableSpace α where
MeasurableSet' s := ∃ s', MeasurableSet[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s
measurableSet_empty := ⟨∅, m.measurableSet_empty, rfl⟩
measurableSet_compl := fun s ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨s'ᶜ, m.measurableSet_compl _ h₁, h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
measurableSet_iUnion s hs :=
let ⟨s', hs'⟩ := Classical.axiom_of_choice hs
⟨⋃ i, s' i, m.measurableSet_iUnion _ fun i => (hs' i).left, by simp [hs']⟩
#align measurable_space.comap MeasurableSpace.comap
theorem comap_eq_generateFrom (m : MeasurableSpace β) (f : α → β) :
m.comap f = generateFrom { t | ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ f ⁻¹' s = t } :=
(@generateFrom_measurableSet _ (.comap f m)).symm
#align measurable_space.comap_eq_generate_from MeasurableSpace.comap_eq_generateFrom
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : m.comap id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun s => ⟨fun ⟨_, hs', h⟩ => h ▸ hs', fun h => ⟨s, h, rfl⟩⟩
#align measurable_space.comap_id MeasurableSpace.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp {f : β → α} {g : γ → β} : (m.comap f).comap g = m.comap (f ∘ g) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨u, h, hu⟩, ht⟩ => ⟨u, h, ht ▸ hu ▸ rfl⟩, fun ⟨t, h, ht⟩ => ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, ht⟩⟩
#align measurable_space.comap_comp MeasurableSpace.comap_comp
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map {f : α → β} : m'.comap f ≤ m ↔ m' ≤ m.map f :=
⟨fun h _s hs => h _ ⟨_, hs, rfl⟩, fun h _s ⟨_t, ht, heq⟩ => heq ▸ h _ ht⟩
#align measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map MeasurableSpace.comap_le_iff_le_map
theorem gc_comap_map (f : α → β) :
GaloisConnection (MeasurableSpace.comap f) (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ =>
comap_le_iff_le_map
#align measurable_space.gc_comap_map MeasurableSpace.gc_comap_map
theorem map_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.map f ≤ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).monotone_u h
#align measurable_space.map_mono MeasurableSpace.map_mono
theorem monotone_map : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ => map_mono
#align measurable_space.monotone_map MeasurableSpace.monotone_map
theorem comap_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.comap g ≤ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).monotone_l h
#align measurable_space.comap_mono MeasurableSpace.comap_mono
theorem monotone_comap : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.comap g) := fun _ _ h => comap_mono h
#align measurable_space.monotone_comap MeasurableSpace.monotone_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : (⊥ : MeasurableSpace α).comap g = ⊥ :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_bot
#align measurable_space.comap_bot MeasurableSpace.comap_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_sup : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).comap g = m₁.comap g ⊔ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_sup
#align measurable_space.comap_sup MeasurableSpace.comap_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_iSup {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨆ i, m i).comap g = ⨆ i, (m i).comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_iSup
#align measurable_space.comap_supr MeasurableSpace.comap_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top : (⊤ : MeasurableSpace α).map f = ⊤ :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_top
#align measurable_space.map_top MeasurableSpace.map_top
@[simp]
theorem map_inf : (m₁ ⊓ m₂).map f = m₁.map f ⊓ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_inf
#align measurable_space.map_inf MeasurableSpace.map_inf
@[simp]
theorem map_iInf {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨅ i, m i).map f = ⨅ i, (m i).map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_iInf
#align measurable_space.map_infi MeasurableSpace.map_iInf
theorem comap_map_le : (m.map f).comap f ≤ m :=
(gc_comap_map f).l_u_le _
#align measurable_space.comap_map_le MeasurableSpace.comap_map_le
theorem le_map_comap : m ≤ (m.comap g).map g :=
(gc_comap_map g).le_u_l _
#align measurable_space.le_map_comap MeasurableSpace.le_map_comap
end Functors
@[simp] theorem map_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.map (fun _a : α ↦ b) m = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| fun s _ ↦ by rw [map_def]; by_cases h : b ∈ s <;> simp [h]
#align measurable_space.map_const MeasurableSpace.map_const
@[simp] theorem comap_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.comap (fun _a : α => b) m = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| by rintro _ ⟨s, -, rfl⟩; by_cases b ∈ s <;> simp [*]
#align measurable_space.comap_const MeasurableSpace.comap_const
theorem comap_generateFrom {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} :
(generateFrom s).comap f = generateFrom (preimage f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(comap_le_iff_le_map.2 <|
generateFrom_le fun _t hts => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ <| mem_image_of_mem _ <| hts)
(generateFrom_le fun _t ⟨u, hu, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ ⟨u, GenerateMeasurable.basic _ hu, rfl⟩)
#align measurable_space.comap_generate_from MeasurableSpace.comap_generateFrom
end MeasurableSpace
section MeasurableFunctions
open MeasurableSpace
theorem measurable_iff_le_map {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂ ≤ m₁.map f :=
Iff.rfl
#align measurable_iff_le_map measurable_iff_le_map
alias ⟨Measurable.le_map, Measurable.of_le_map⟩ := measurable_iff_le_map
#align measurable.le_map Measurable.le_map
#align measurable.of_le_map Measurable.of_le_map
theorem measurable_iff_comap_le {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂.comap f ≤ m₁ :=
comap_le_iff_le_map.symm
#align measurable_iff_comap_le measurable_iff_comap_le
alias ⟨Measurable.comap_le, Measurable.of_comap_le⟩ := measurable_iff_comap_le
#align measurable.comap_le Measurable.comap_le
#align measurable.of_comap_le Measurable.of_comap_le
theorem comap_measurable {m : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) : Measurable[m.comap f] f :=
fun s hs => ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
#align comap_measurable comap_measurable
theorem Measurable.mono {ma ma' : MeasurableSpace α} {mb mb' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : @Measurable α β ma mb f) (ha : ma ≤ ma') (hb : mb' ≤ mb) : @Measurable α β ma' mb' f :=
fun _t ht => ha _ <| hf <| hb _ ht
#align measurable.mono Measurable.mono
theorem measurable_id'' {m mα : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ mα) : @Measurable α α mα m id :=
measurable_id.mono le_rfl hm
#align probability_theory.measurable_id'' measurable_id''
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add TC `DiscreteMeasurable` + instances
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_from_top [MeasurableSpace β] {f : α → β} : Measurable[⊤] f := fun _ _ => trivial
#align measurable_from_top measurable_from_top
theorem measurable_generateFrom [MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t)) : @Measurable _ _ _ (generateFrom s) f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <| generateFrom_le h
#align measurable_generate_from measurable_generateFrom
variable {f g : α → β}
section TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.measurable [Subsingleton α] : Measurable f := fun _ _ =>
@Subsingleton.measurableSet α _ _ _
#align subsingleton.measurable Subsingleton.measurable
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
fun s _ => Subsingleton.set_cases MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.univ s
#align measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem measurable_one [One α] : Measurable (1 : β → α) :=
@measurable_const _ _ _ _ 1
#align measurable_one measurable_one
#align measurable_zero measurable_zero
theorem measurable_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
Subsingleton.measurable
#align measurable_of_empty measurable_of_empty
theorem measurable_of_empty_codomain [IsEmpty β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f
#align measurable_of_empty_codomain measurable_of_empty_codomain
/-- A version of `measurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`. This version works
for functions between empty types. -/
theorem measurable_const' {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : Measurable f := by
nontriviality β
inhabit β
convert @measurable_const α β _ _ (f default) using 2
apply hf
#align measurable_const' measurable_const'
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_natCast [NatCast α] (n : ℕ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
#align measurable_nat_cast measurable_natCast
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_intCast [IntCast α] (n : ℤ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
#align measurable_int_cast measurable_intCast
theorem measurable_of_countable [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) :
Measurable f := fun s _ =>
(f ⁻¹' s).to_countable.measurableSet
#align measurable_of_countable measurable_of_countable
theorem measurable_of_finite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_countable f
#align measurable_of_finite measurable_of_finite
end TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.iterate {f : α → α} (hf : Measurable f) : ∀ n, Measurable f^[n]
| 0 => measurable_id
| n + 1 => (Measurable.iterate hf n).comp hf
#align measurable.iterate Measurable.iterate
variable {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_preimage {t : Set β} (hf : Measurable f) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
#align measurable_set_preimage measurableSet_preimage
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
protected theorem MeasurableSet.preimage {t : Set β} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
@[measurability]
protected theorem Measurable.piecewise {_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable (piecewise s f g) := by
intro t ht
rw [piecewise_preimage]
exact hs.ite (hf ht) (hg ht)
#align measurable.piecewise Measurable.piecewise
/-- This is slightly different from `Measurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`Measurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact Measurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const`,
but replacing `Measurable.ite` by `Measurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
theorem Measurable.ite {p : α → Prop} {_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a })
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
Measurable.piecewise hp hf hg
#align measurable.ite Measurable.ite
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.indicator [Zero β] (hf : Measurable f) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs measurable_const
#align measurable.indicator Measurable.indicator
/-- The measurability of a set `A` is equivalent to the measurability of the indicator function
which takes a constant value `b ≠ 0` on a set `A` and `0` elsewhere. -/
lemma measurable_indicator_const_iff [Zero β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (b : β) [NeZero b] :
Measurable (s.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)) ↔ MeasurableSet s := by
constructor <;> intro h
· convert h (MeasurableSet.singleton (0 : β)).compl
ext a
simp [NeZero.ne b]
· exact measurable_const.indicator h
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem measurableSet_mulSupport [One β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) :=
hf (measurableSet_singleton 1).compl
#align measurable_set_mul_support measurableSet_mulSupport
#align measurable_set_support measurableSet_support
/-- If a function coincides with a measurable function outside of a countable set, it is
measurable. -/
theorem Measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (hf : Measurable f)
(h : Set.Countable { x | f x ≠ g x }) : Measurable g := by
intro t ht
have : g ⁻¹' t = g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x }ᶜ ∪ g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x } := by
simp [← inter_union_distrib_left]
rw [this]
refine (h.mono inter_subset_right).measurableSet.union ?_
have : g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } = f ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } := by
ext x
simp (config := { contextual := true })
rw [this]
exact (hf ht).inter h.measurableSet.of_compl
#align measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne Measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne
end MeasurableFunctions
section Constructions
instance Empty.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace Empty := ⊤
#align empty.measurable_space Empty.instMeasurableSpace
instance PUnit.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace PUnit := ⊤
#align punit.measurable_space PUnit.instMeasurableSpace
instance Bool.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace Bool := ⊤
#align bool.measurable_space Bool.instMeasurableSpace
instance Prop.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace Prop := ⊤
#align Prop.measurable_space Prop.instMeasurableSpace
instance Nat.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace ℕ := ⊤
#align nat.measurable_space Nat.instMeasurableSpace
instance Fin.instMeasurableSpace (n : ℕ) : MeasurableSpace (Fin n) := ⊤
instance Int.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace ℤ := ⊤
#align int.measurable_space Int.instMeasurableSpace
instance Rat.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace ℚ := ⊤
#align rat.measurable_space Rat.instMeasurableSpace
instance Subsingleton.measurableSingletonClass {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [Subsingleton α] :
MeasurableSingletonClass α := by
refine ⟨fun i => ?_⟩
convert MeasurableSet.univ
simp [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#noalign empty.measurable_singleton_class
#noalign punit.measurable_singleton_class
instance Bool.instMeasurableSingletonClass : MeasurableSingletonClass Bool := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
#align bool.measurable_singleton_class Bool.instMeasurableSingletonClass
instance Prop.instMeasurableSingletonClass : MeasurableSingletonClass Prop := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
#align Prop.measurable_singleton_class Prop.instMeasurableSingletonClass
instance Nat.instMeasurableSingletonClass : MeasurableSingletonClass ℕ := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
#align nat.measurable_singleton_class Nat.instMeasurableSingletonClass
instance Fin.instMeasurableSingletonClass (n : ℕ) : MeasurableSingletonClass (Fin n) :=
⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
instance Int.instMeasurableSingletonClass : MeasurableSingletonClass ℤ := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
#align int.measurable_singleton_class Int.instMeasurableSingletonClass
instance Rat.instMeasurableSingletonClass : MeasurableSingletonClass ℚ := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
#align rat.measurable_singleton_class Rat.instMeasurableSingletonClass
theorem measurable_to_countable [MeasurableSpace α] [Countable α] [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → α}
(h : ∀ y, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {f y})) : Measurable f := fun s _ => by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton]
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun y => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hy => ?_
by_cases hyf : y ∈ range f
· rcases hyf with ⟨y, rfl⟩
apply h
· simp only [preimage_singleton_eq_empty.2 hyf, MeasurableSet.empty]
#align measurable_to_countable measurable_to_countable
theorem measurable_to_countable' [MeasurableSpace α] [Countable α] [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → α}
(h : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {x})) : Measurable f :=
measurable_to_countable fun y => h (f y)
#align measurable_to_countable' measurable_to_countable'
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_unit [MeasurableSpace α] (f : Unit → α) : Measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
#align measurable_unit measurable_unit
section ULift
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
instance _root_.ULift.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace (ULift α) :=
‹MeasurableSpace α›.map ULift.up
lemma measurable_down : Measurable (ULift.down : ULift α → α) := fun _ ↦ id
lemma measurable_up : Measurable (ULift.up : α → ULift α) := fun _ ↦ id
@[simp] lemma measurableSet_preimage_down {s : Set α} :
MeasurableSet (ULift.down ⁻¹' s) ↔ MeasurableSet s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma measurableSet_preimage_up {s : Set (ULift α)} :
MeasurableSet (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) ↔ MeasurableSet s := Iff.rfl
end ULift
section Nat
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_from_nat {f : ℕ → α} : Measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
#align measurable_from_nat measurable_from_nat
theorem measurable_to_nat {f : α → ℕ} : (∀ y, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {f y})) → Measurable f :=
measurable_to_countable
#align measurable_to_nat measurable_to_nat
theorem measurable_to_bool {f : α → Bool} (h : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {true})) : Measurable f := by
apply measurable_to_countable'
rintro (- | -)
· convert h.compl
rw [← preimage_compl, Bool.compl_singleton, Bool.not_true]
exact h
#align measurable_to_bool measurable_to_bool
theorem measurable_to_prop {f : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {True})) : Measurable f := by
refine measurable_to_countable' fun x => ?_
by_cases hx : x
· simpa [hx] using h
· simpa only [hx, ← preimage_compl, Prop.compl_singleton, not_true, preimage_singleton_false]
using h.compl
#align measurable_to_prop measurable_to_prop
theorem measurable_findGreatest' {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, DecidablePred (p x)] {N : ℕ}
(hN : ∀ k ≤ N, MeasurableSet { x | Nat.findGreatest (p x) N = k }) :
Measurable fun x => Nat.findGreatest (p x) N :=
measurable_to_nat fun _ => hN _ N.findGreatest_le
#align measurable_find_greatest' measurable_findGreatest'
theorem measurable_findGreatest {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, DecidablePred (p x)] {N}
(hN : ∀ k ≤ N, MeasurableSet { x | p x k }) : Measurable fun x => Nat.findGreatest (p x) N := by
refine measurable_findGreatest' fun k hk => ?_
simp only [Nat.findGreatest_eq_iff, setOf_and, setOf_forall, ← compl_setOf]
repeat' apply_rules [MeasurableSet.inter, MeasurableSet.const, MeasurableSet.iInter,
MeasurableSet.compl, hN] <;> try intros
#align measurable_find_greatest measurable_findGreatest
theorem measurable_find {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, DecidablePred (p x)] (hp : ∀ x, ∃ N, p x N)
(hm : ∀ k, MeasurableSet { x | p x k }) : Measurable fun x => Nat.find (hp x) := by
refine measurable_to_nat fun x => ?_
rw [preimage_find_eq_disjointed (fun k => {x | p x k})]
exact MeasurableSet.disjointed hm _
#align measurable_find measurable_find
end Nat
section Quotient
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
instance Quot.instMeasurableSpace {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [m : MeasurableSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace (Quot r) :=
m.map (Quot.mk r)
#align quot.measurable_space Quot.instMeasurableSpace
instance Quotient.instMeasurableSpace {α} {s : Setoid α} [m : MeasurableSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace (Quotient s) :=
m.map Quotient.mk''
#align quotient.measurable_space Quotient.instMeasurableSpace
@[to_additive]
instance QuotientGroup.measurableSpace {G} [Group G] [MeasurableSpace G] (S : Subgroup G) :
MeasurableSpace (G ⧸ S) :=
Quotient.instMeasurableSpace
#align quotient_group.measurable_space QuotientGroup.measurableSpace
#align quotient_add_group.measurable_space QuotientAddGroup.measurableSpace
theorem measurableSet_quotient {s : Setoid α} {t : Set (Quotient s)} :
MeasurableSet t ↔ MeasurableSet (Quotient.mk'' ⁻¹' t) :=
Iff.rfl
#align measurable_set_quotient measurableSet_quotient
theorem measurable_from_quotient {s : Setoid α} {f : Quotient s → β} :
Measurable f ↔ Measurable (f ∘ Quotient.mk'') :=
Iff.rfl
#align measurable_from_quotient measurable_from_quotient
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_quotient_mk' [s : Setoid α] : Measurable (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) :=
fun _ => id
#align measurable_quotient_mk measurable_quotient_mk'
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_quotient_mk'' {s : Setoid α} : Measurable (Quotient.mk'' : α → Quotient s) :=
fun _ => id
#align measurable_quotient_mk' measurable_quotient_mk''
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_quot_mk {r : α → α → Prop} : Measurable (Quot.mk r) := fun _ => id
#align measurable_quot_mk measurable_quot_mk
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem QuotientGroup.measurable_coe {G} [Group G] [MeasurableSpace G] {S : Subgroup G} :
Measurable ((↑) : G → G ⧸ S) :=
measurable_quotient_mk''
#align quotient_group.measurable_coe QuotientGroup.measurable_coe
#align quotient_add_group.measurable_coe QuotientAddGroup.measurable_coe
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem QuotientGroup.measurable_from_quotient {G} [Group G] [MeasurableSpace G]
{S : Subgroup G} {f : G ⧸ S → α} : Measurable f ↔ Measurable (f ∘ ((↑) : G → G ⧸ S)) :=
measurable_from_quotient
#align quotient_group.measurable_from_quotient QuotientGroup.measurable_from_quotient
#align quotient_add_group.measurable_from_quotient QuotientAddGroup.measurable_from_quotient
end Quotient
section Subtype
instance Subtype.instMeasurableSpace {α} {p : α → Prop} [m : MeasurableSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace (Subtype p) :=
m.comap ((↑) : _ → α)
#align subtype.measurable_space Subtype.instMeasurableSpace
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_subtype_coe {p : α → Prop} : Measurable ((↑) : Subtype p → α) :=
MeasurableSpace.le_map_comap
#align measurable_subtype_coe measurable_subtype_coe
instance Subtype.instMeasurableSingletonClass {p : α → Prop} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
MeasurableSingletonClass (Subtype p) where
measurableSet_singleton x :=
⟨{(x : α)}, measurableSet_singleton (x : α), by
rw [← image_singleton, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective]⟩
#align subtype.measurable_singleton_class Subtype.instMeasurableSingletonClass
end
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
theorem MeasurableSet.of_subtype_image {s : Set α} {t : Set s}
(h : MeasurableSet (Subtype.val '' t)) : MeasurableSet t :=
⟨_, h, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩
theorem MeasurableSet.subtype_image {s : Set α} {t : Set s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet t → MeasurableSet (((↑) : s → α) '' t) := by
rintro ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter hu
#align measurable_set.subtype_image MeasurableSet.subtype_image
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.subtype_coe {p : β → Prop} {f : α → Subtype p} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun a : α => (f a : β) :=
measurable_subtype_coe.comp hf
#align measurable.subtype_coe Measurable.subtype_coe
alias Measurable.subtype_val := Measurable.subtype_coe
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.subtype_mk {p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {h : ∀ x, p (f x)} :
Measurable fun x => (⟨f x, h x⟩ : Subtype p) := fun t ⟨s, hs⟩ =>
hs.2 ▸ by simp only [← preimage_comp, (· ∘ ·), Subtype.coe_mk, hf hs.1]
#align measurable.subtype_mk Measurable.subtype_mk
@[measurability]
protected theorem Measurable.rangeFactorization {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable (rangeFactorization f) :=
hf.subtype_mk
theorem Measurable.subtype_map {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (hf : Measurable f)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Measurable (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(hf.comp measurable_subtype_coe).subtype_mk
theorem measurable_inclusion {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : Measurable (inclusion h) :=
measurable_id.subtype_map h
theorem MeasurableSet.image_inclusion' {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) {u : Set s}
(hs : MeasurableSet (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s : Set t)) (hu : MeasurableSet u) :
MeasurableSet (inclusion h '' u) := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
convert (measurable_subtype_coe hu).inter hs
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa [@and_comm _ (_ = x)] using and_comm
theorem MeasurableSet.image_inclusion {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) {u : Set s}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hu : MeasurableSet u) :
MeasurableSet (inclusion h '' u) :=
(measurable_subtype_coe hs).image_inclusion' h hu
theorem MeasurableSet.of_union_cover {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hsu : MeasurableSet (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u))
(htu : MeasurableSet (((↑) : t → α) ⁻¹' u)) : MeasurableSet u := by
convert (hs.subtype_image hsu).union (ht.subtype_image htu)
simp [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left, univ_subset_iff.1 h]
theorem measurable_of_measurable_union_cover {f : α → β} (s t : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hc : Measurable fun a : s => f a)
(hd : Measurable fun a : t => f a) : Measurable f := fun _u hu =>
.of_union_cover hs ht h (hc hu) (hd hu)
#align measurable_of_measurable_union_cover measurable_of_measurable_union_cover
theorem measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h₁ : Measurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : Measurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁ h₂
#align measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl
theorem Measurable.dite [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] {f : s → β} (hf : Measurable f)
{g : (sᶜ : Set α) → β} (hg : Measurable g) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => if hx : x ∈ s then f ⟨x, hx⟩ else g ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs (by simpa) (by simpa)
#align measurable.dite Measurable.dite
theorem measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → β}
(s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite) (hf : Measurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) : Measurable f :=
have := hs.to_subtype
measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs.measurableSet (measurable_of_finite _) hf
#align measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite
theorem measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → β} (a : α)
(hf : Measurable ({ x | x ≠ a }.restrict f)) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite {a} (finite_singleton a) hf
#align measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton
end Subtype
section Atoms
variable [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- The *measurable atom* of `x` is the intersection of all the measurable sets countaining `x`.
It is measurable when the space is countable (or more generally when the measurable space is
countably generated). -/
def measurableAtom (x : β) : Set β :=
⋂ (s : Set β) (_h's : x ∈ s) (_hs : MeasurableSet s), s
@[simp] lemma mem_measurableAtom_self (x : β) : x ∈ measurableAtom x := by
simp (config := {contextual := true}) [measurableAtom]
lemma mem_of_mem_measurableAtom {x y : β} (h : y ∈ measurableAtom x) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hxs : x ∈ s) : y ∈ s := by
simp only [measurableAtom, mem_iInter] at h
exact h s hxs hs
lemma measurableAtom_subset {s : Set β} {x : β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
measurableAtom x ⊆ s :=
iInter₂_subset_of_subset s hx fun ⦃a⦄ ↦ (by simp [hs])
@[simp] lemma measurableAtom_of_measurableSingletonClass [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (x : β) :
measurableAtom x = {x} :=
Subset.antisymm (measurableAtom_subset (measurableSet_singleton x) rfl) (by simp)
lemma MeasurableSet.measurableAtom_of_countable [Countable β] (x : β) :
MeasurableSet (measurableAtom x) := by
have : ∀ (y : β), y ∉ measurableAtom x → ∃ s, x ∈ s ∧ MeasurableSet s ∧ y ∉ s :=
fun y hy ↦ by simpa [measurableAtom] using hy
choose! s hs using this
have : measurableAtom x = ⋂ (y ∈ (measurableAtom x)ᶜ), s y := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro z hz
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff]
intro i hi
show z ∈ s i
exact mem_of_mem_measurableAtom hz (hs i hi).2.1 (hs i hi).1
· apply compl_subset_compl.1
intro z hz
simp only [compl_iInter, mem_iUnion, mem_compl_iff, exists_prop]
exact ⟨z, hz, (hs z hz).2.2⟩
rw [this]
exact MeasurableSet.biInter (to_countable (measurableAtom x)ᶜ) (fun i hi ↦ (hs i hi).2.1)
end Atoms
section Prod
/-- A `MeasurableSpace` structure on the product of two measurable spaces. -/
def MeasurableSpace.prod {α β} (m₁ : MeasurableSpace α) (m₂ : MeasurableSpace β) :
MeasurableSpace (α × β) :=
m₁.comap Prod.fst ⊔ m₂.comap Prod.snd
#align measurable_space.prod MeasurableSpace.prod
instance Prod.instMeasurableSpace {α β} [m₁ : MeasurableSpace α] [m₂ : MeasurableSpace β] :
MeasurableSpace (α × β) :=
m₁.prod m₂
#align prod.measurable_space Prod.instMeasurableSpace
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_fst {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} :
Measurable (Prod.fst : α × β → α) :=
Measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_left
#align measurable_fst measurable_fst
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_snd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} :
Measurable (Prod.snd : α × β → β) :=
Measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_right
#align measurable_snd measurable_snd
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
theorem Measurable.fst {f : α → β × γ} (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable fun a : α => (f a).1 :=
measurable_fst.comp hf
#align measurable.fst Measurable.fst
theorem Measurable.snd {f : α → β × γ} (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable fun a : α => (f a).2 :=
measurable_snd.comp hf
#align measurable.snd Measurable.snd
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.prod {f : α → β × γ} (hf₁ : Measurable fun a => (f a).1)
(hf₂ : Measurable fun a => (f a).2) : Measurable f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <|
sup_le
(by
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap_le_iff_le_map, MeasurableSpace.map_comp]
exact hf₁)
(by
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap_le_iff_le_map, MeasurableSpace.map_comp]
exact hf₂)
#align measurable.prod Measurable.prod
theorem Measurable.prod_mk {β γ} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} {f : α → β}
{g : α → γ} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun a : α => (f a, g a) :=
Measurable.prod hf hg
#align measurable.prod_mk Measurable.prod_mk
theorem Measurable.prod_map [MeasurableSpace δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : Measurable (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk (hg.comp measurable_snd)
#align measurable.prod_map Measurable.prod_map
theorem measurable_prod_mk_left {x : α} : Measurable (@Prod.mk _ β x) :=
measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_id
#align measurable_prod_mk_left measurable_prod_mk_left
theorem measurable_prod_mk_right {y : β} : Measurable fun x : α => (x, y) :=
measurable_id.prod_mk measurable_const
#align measurable_prod_mk_right measurable_prod_mk_right
theorem Measurable.of_uncurry_left {f : α → β → γ} (hf : Measurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} :
Measurable (f x) :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_left
#align measurable.of_uncurry_left Measurable.of_uncurry_left
theorem Measurable.of_uncurry_right {f : α → β → γ} (hf : Measurable (uncurry f)) {y : β} :
Measurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_right
#align measurable.of_uncurry_right Measurable.of_uncurry_right
theorem measurable_prod {f : α → β × γ} :
Measurable f ↔ (Measurable fun a => (f a).1) ∧ Measurable fun a => (f a).2 :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨measurable_fst.comp hf, measurable_snd.comp hf⟩, fun h => Measurable.prod h.1 h.2⟩
#align measurable_prod measurable_prod
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_swap : Measurable (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) :=
Measurable.prod measurable_snd measurable_fst
#align measurable_swap measurable_swap
theorem measurable_swap_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
Measurable (f ∘ Prod.swap) ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun hf => hf.comp measurable_swap, fun hf => hf.comp measurable_swap⟩
#align measurable_swap_iff measurable_swap_iff
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (s ×ˢ t) :=
MeasurableSet.inter (measurable_fst hs) (measurable_snd ht)
#align measurable_set.prod MeasurableSet.prod
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Basic.lean | 836 | 842 | theorem measurableSet_prod_of_nonempty {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
MeasurableSet (s ×ˢ t) ↔ MeasurableSet s ∧ MeasurableSet t := by |
rcases h with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hx, hy⟩
refine ⟨fun hst => ?_, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
have : MeasurableSet ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t) := measurable_prod_mk_right hst
have : MeasurableSet (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t) := measurable_prod_mk_left hst
simp_all
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.PrimeMultiplicity
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.discrete_valuation_ring.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c163ec99dfc664628ca15d215fce0a5b9c265b68"
/-!
# Discrete valuation rings
This file defines discrete valuation rings (DVRs) and develops a basic interface
for them.
## Important definitions
There are various definitions of a DVR in the literature; we define a DVR to be a local PID
which is not a field (the first definition in Wikipedia) and prove that this is equivalent
to being a PID with a unique non-zero prime ideal (the definition in Serre's
book "Local Fields").
Let R be an integral domain, assumed to be a principal ideal ring and a local ring.
* `DiscreteValuationRing R` : a predicate expressing that R is a DVR.
### Definitions
* `addVal R : AddValuation R PartENat` : the additive valuation on a DVR.
## Implementation notes
It's a theorem that an element of a DVR is a uniformizer if and only if it's irreducible.
We do not hence define `Uniformizer` at all, because we can use `Irreducible` instead.
## Tags
discrete valuation ring
-/
open scoped Classical
universe u
open Ideal LocalRing
/-- An integral domain is a *discrete valuation ring* (DVR) if it's a local PID which
is not a field. -/
class DiscreteValuationRing (R : Type u) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
extends IsPrincipalIdealRing R, LocalRing R : Prop where
not_a_field' : maximalIdeal R ≠ ⊥
#align discrete_valuation_ring DiscreteValuationRing
namespace DiscreteValuationRing
variable (R : Type u) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DiscreteValuationRing R]
theorem not_a_field : maximalIdeal R ≠ ⊥ :=
not_a_field'
#align discrete_valuation_ring.not_a_field DiscreteValuationRing.not_a_field
/-- A discrete valuation ring `R` is not a field. -/
theorem not_isField : ¬IsField R :=
LocalRing.isField_iff_maximalIdeal_eq.not.mpr (not_a_field R)
#align discrete_valuation_ring.not_is_field DiscreteValuationRing.not_isField
variable {R}
open PrincipalIdealRing
theorem irreducible_of_span_eq_maximalIdeal {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [LocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
(ϖ : R) (hϖ : ϖ ≠ 0) (h : maximalIdeal R = Ideal.span {ϖ}) : Irreducible ϖ := by
have h2 : ¬IsUnit ϖ := show ϖ ∈ maximalIdeal R from h.symm ▸ Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self ϖ
refine ⟨h2, ?_⟩
intro a b hab
by_contra! h
obtain ⟨ha : a ∈ maximalIdeal R, hb : b ∈ maximalIdeal R⟩ := h
rw [h, mem_span_singleton'] at ha hb
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rcases hb with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [show a * ϖ * (b * ϖ) = ϖ * (ϖ * (a * b)) by ring] at hab
apply hϖ
apply eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right _ hab.symm
exact fun hh => h2 (isUnit_of_dvd_one ⟨_, hh.symm⟩)
#align discrete_valuation_ring.irreducible_of_span_eq_maximal_ideal DiscreteValuationRing.irreducible_of_span_eq_maximalIdeal
/-- An element of a DVR is irreducible iff it is a uniformizer, that is, generates the
maximal ideal of `R`. -/
theorem irreducible_iff_uniformizer (ϖ : R) : Irreducible ϖ ↔ maximalIdeal R = Ideal.span {ϖ} :=
⟨fun hϖ => (eq_maximalIdeal (isMaximal_of_irreducible hϖ)).symm,
fun h => irreducible_of_span_eq_maximalIdeal ϖ
(fun e => not_a_field R <| by rwa [h, span_singleton_eq_bot]) h⟩
#align discrete_valuation_ring.irreducible_iff_uniformizer DiscreteValuationRing.irreducible_iff_uniformizer
theorem _root_.Irreducible.maximalIdeal_eq {ϖ : R} (h : Irreducible ϖ) :
maximalIdeal R = Ideal.span {ϖ} :=
(irreducible_iff_uniformizer _).mp h
#align irreducible.maximal_ideal_eq Irreducible.maximalIdeal_eq
variable (R)
/-- Uniformizers exist in a DVR. -/
theorem exists_irreducible : ∃ ϖ : R, Irreducible ϖ := by
simp_rw [irreducible_iff_uniformizer]
exact (IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal <| maximalIdeal R).principal
#align discrete_valuation_ring.exists_irreducible DiscreteValuationRing.exists_irreducible
/-- Uniformizers exist in a DVR. -/
theorem exists_prime : ∃ ϖ : R, Prime ϖ :=
(exists_irreducible R).imp fun _ => irreducible_iff_prime.1
#align discrete_valuation_ring.exists_prime DiscreteValuationRing.exists_prime
/-- An integral domain is a DVR iff it's a PID with a unique non-zero prime ideal. -/
theorem iff_pid_with_one_nonzero_prime (R : Type u) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
DiscreteValuationRing R ↔ IsPrincipalIdealRing R ∧ ∃! P : Ideal R, P ≠ ⊥ ∧ IsPrime P := by
constructor
· intro RDVR
rcases id RDVR with ⟨Rlocal⟩
constructor
· assumption
use LocalRing.maximalIdeal R
constructor
· exact ⟨Rlocal, inferInstance⟩
· rintro Q ⟨hQ1, hQ2⟩
obtain ⟨q, rfl⟩ := (IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal Q).1
have hq : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
apply hQ1
simp
erw [span_singleton_prime hq] at hQ2
replace hQ2 := hQ2.irreducible
rw [irreducible_iff_uniformizer] at hQ2
exact hQ2.symm
· rintro ⟨RPID, Punique⟩
haveI : LocalRing R := LocalRing.of_unique_nonzero_prime Punique
refine { not_a_field' := ?_ }
rcases Punique with ⟨P, ⟨hP1, hP2⟩, _⟩
have hPM : P ≤ maximalIdeal R := le_maximalIdeal hP2.1
intro h
rw [h, le_bot_iff] at hPM
exact hP1 hPM
#align discrete_valuation_ring.iff_pid_with_one_nonzero_prime DiscreteValuationRing.iff_pid_with_one_nonzero_prime
theorem associated_of_irreducible {a b : R} (ha : Irreducible a) (hb : Irreducible b) :
Associated a b := by
rw [irreducible_iff_uniformizer] at ha hb
rw [← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, ← ha, hb]
#align discrete_valuation_ring.associated_of_irreducible DiscreteValuationRing.associated_of_irreducible
end DiscreteValuationRing
namespace DiscreteValuationRing
variable (R : Type*)
/-- Alternative characterisation of discrete valuation rings. -/
def HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization [CommRing R] : Prop :=
∃ p : R, Irreducible p ∧ ∀ {x : R}, x ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℕ, Associated (p ^ n) x
#align discrete_valuation_ring.has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization DiscreteValuationRing.HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization
namespace HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization
variable {R} [CommRing R] (hR : HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization R)
theorem unique_irreducible ⦃p q : R⦄ (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
Associated p q := by
rcases hR with ⟨ϖ, hϖ, hR⟩
suffices ∀ {p : R} (_ : Irreducible p), Associated p ϖ by
apply Associated.trans (this hp) (this hq).symm
clear hp hq p q
intro p hp
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hR hp.ne_zero
have : Irreducible (ϖ ^ n) := hn.symm.irreducible hp
rcases lt_trichotomy n 1 with (H | rfl | H)
· obtain rfl : n = 0 := by
clear hn this
revert H n
decide
simp [not_irreducible_one, pow_zero] at this
· simpa only [pow_one] using hn.symm
· obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ k, n = 1 + k + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt H
rw [pow_succ'] at this
rcases this.isUnit_or_isUnit rfl with (H0 | H0)
· exact (hϖ.not_unit H0).elim
· rw [add_comm, pow_succ'] at H0
exact (hϖ.not_unit (isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left H0)).elim
#align discrete_valuation_ring.has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization.unique_irreducible DiscreteValuationRing.HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization.unique_irreducible
variable [IsDomain R]
/-- An integral domain in which there is an irreducible element `p`
such that every nonzero element is associated to a power of `p` is a unique factorization domain.
See `DiscreteValuationRing.ofHasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization`. -/
theorem toUniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid R :=
let p := Classical.choose hR
let spec := Classical.choose_spec hR
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.of_exists_prime_factors fun x hx => by
use Multiset.replicate (Classical.choose (spec.2 hx)) p
constructor
· intro q hq
have hpq := Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate hq
rw [hpq]
refine ⟨spec.1.ne_zero, spec.1.not_unit, ?_⟩
intro a b h
by_cases ha : a = 0
· rw [ha]
simp only [true_or_iff, dvd_zero]
obtain ⟨m, u, rfl⟩ := spec.2 ha
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, Units.dvd_mul_left] at h
rw [Units.dvd_mul_right]
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp only [hm, one_mul, pow_zero] at h ⊢
right
exact h
left
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hm
rw [pow_succ']
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left dvd_rfl _
· rw [Multiset.prod_replicate]
exact Classical.choose_spec (spec.2 hx)
#align discrete_valuation_ring.has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization.to_unique_factorization_monoid DiscreteValuationRing.HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization.toUniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible [UniqueFactorizationMonoid R] (h₁ : ∃ p : R, Irreducible p)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃p q : R⦄, Irreducible p → Irreducible q → Associated p q) :
HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization R := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h₁
refine ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
intro x hx
cases' WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors x hx with fx hfx
refine ⟨Multiset.card fx, ?_⟩
have H := hfx.2
rw [← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated] at H ⊢
rw [← H, ← Associates.prod_mk, Associates.mk_pow, ← Multiset.prod_replicate]
congr 1
symm
rw [Multiset.eq_replicate]
simp only [true_and_iff, and_imp, Multiset.card_map, eq_self_iff_true, Multiset.mem_map,
exists_imp]
rintro _ q hq rfl
rw [Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
apply h₂ (hfx.1 _ hq) hp
#align discrete_valuation_ring.has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization.of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible DiscreteValuationRing.HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization.of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible
end HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization
theorem aux_pid_of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible (R : Type u) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[UniqueFactorizationMonoid R] (h₁ : ∃ p : R, Irreducible p)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃p q : R⦄, Irreducible p → Irreducible q → Associated p q) :
IsPrincipalIdealRing R := by
constructor
intro I
by_cases I0 : I = ⊥
· rw [I0]
use 0
simp only [Set.singleton_zero, Submodule.span_zero]
obtain ⟨x, hxI, hx0⟩ : ∃ x ∈ I, x ≠ (0 : R) := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I0
obtain ⟨p, _, H⟩ := HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization.of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible h₁ h₂
have ex : ∃ n : ℕ, p ^ n ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H hx0
refine ⟨n, ?_⟩
simpa only [Units.mul_inv_cancel_right] using I.mul_mem_right (↑u⁻¹) hxI
constructor
use p ^ Nat.find ex
show I = Ideal.span _
apply le_antisymm
· intro r hr
by_cases hr0 : r = 0
· simp only [hr0, Submodule.zero_mem]
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H hr0
simp only [mem_span_singleton, Units.isUnit, IsUnit.dvd_mul_right]
apply pow_dvd_pow
apply Nat.find_min'
simpa only [Units.mul_inv_cancel_right] using I.mul_mem_right (↑u⁻¹) hr
· erw [Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem]
exact Nat.find_spec ex
#align discrete_valuation_ring.aux_pid_of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible DiscreteValuationRing.aux_pid_of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible
/-- A unique factorization domain with at least one irreducible element
in which all irreducible elements are associated
is a discrete valuation ring.
-/
theorem of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[UniqueFactorizationMonoid R] (h₁ : ∃ p : R, Irreducible p)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃p q : R⦄, Irreducible p → Irreducible q → Associated p q) :
DiscreteValuationRing R := by
rw [iff_pid_with_one_nonzero_prime]
haveI PID : IsPrincipalIdealRing R := aux_pid_of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible R h₁ h₂
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h₁
refine ⟨PID, ⟨Ideal.span {p}, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [Submodule.ne_bot_iff]
exact ⟨p, Ideal.mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl p), hp.ne_zero⟩
· rwa [Ideal.span_singleton_prime hp.ne_zero, ← UniqueFactorizationMonoid.irreducible_iff_prime]
· intro I
rw [← Submodule.IsPrincipal.span_singleton_generator I]
rintro ⟨I0, hI⟩
apply span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr
apply h₂ _ hp
erw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_bot] at I0
rwa [UniqueFactorizationMonoid.irreducible_iff_prime, ← Ideal.span_singleton_prime I0]
#align discrete_valuation_ring.of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible DiscreteValuationRing.of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible
/-- An integral domain in which there is an irreducible element `p`
such that every nonzero element is associated to a power of `p`
is a discrete valuation ring.
-/
theorem ofHasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
(hR : HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization R) : DiscreteValuationRing R := by
letI : UniqueFactorizationMonoid R := hR.toUniqueFactorizationMonoid
apply of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible _ hR.unique_irreducible
obtain ⟨p, hp, H⟩ := hR
exact ⟨p, hp⟩
#align discrete_valuation_ring.of_has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization DiscreteValuationRing.ofHasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization
section
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DiscreteValuationRing R]
variable {R}
theorem associated_pow_irreducible {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) {ϖ : R} (hirr : Irreducible ϖ) :
∃ n : ℕ, Associated x (ϖ ^ n) := by
have : WfDvdMonoid R := IsNoetherianRing.wfDvdMonoid
cases' WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors x hx with fx hfx
use Multiset.card fx
have H := hfx.2
rw [← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated] at H ⊢
rw [← H, ← Associates.prod_mk, Associates.mk_pow, ← Multiset.prod_replicate]
congr 1
rw [Multiset.eq_replicate]
simp only [true_and_iff, and_imp, Multiset.card_map, eq_self_iff_true, Multiset.mem_map,
exists_imp]
rintro _ _ _ rfl
rw [Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
refine associated_of_irreducible _ ?_ hirr
apply hfx.1
assumption
#align discrete_valuation_ring.associated_pow_irreducible DiscreteValuationRing.associated_pow_irreducible
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DiscreteValuationRing/Basic.lean | 342 | 347 | theorem eq_unit_mul_pow_irreducible {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) {ϖ : R} (hirr : Irreducible ϖ) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (u : Rˣ), x = u * ϖ ^ n := by |
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := associated_pow_irreducible hx hirr
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := hn.symm
use n, u
apply mul_comm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.biproducts from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ac3ae212f394f508df43e37aa093722fa9b65d31"
/-!
# Biproducts and binary biproducts
We introduce the notion of (finite) biproducts and binary biproducts.
These are slightly unusual relative to the other shapes in the library,
as they are simultaneously limits and colimits.
(Zero objects are similar; they are "biterminal".)
For results about biproducts in preadditive categories see
`CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`.
In a category with zero morphisms, we model the (binary) biproduct of `P Q : C`
using a `BinaryBicone`, which has a cone point `X`,
and morphisms `fst : X ⟶ P`, `snd : X ⟶ Q`, `inl : P ⟶ X` and `inr : X ⟶ Q`,
such that `inl ≫ fst = 𝟙 P`, `inl ≫ snd = 0`, `inr ≫ fst = 0`, and `inr ≫ snd = 𝟙 Q`.
Such a `BinaryBicone` is a biproduct if the cone is a limit cone, and the cocone is a colimit
cocone.
For biproducts indexed by a `Fintype J`, a `bicone` again consists of a cone point `X`
and morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
## Notation
As `⊕` is already taken for the sum of types, we introduce the notation `X ⊞ Y` for
a binary biproduct. We introduce `⨁ f` for the indexed biproduct.
## Implementation notes
Prior to leanprover-community/mathlib#14046,
`HasFiniteBiproducts` required a `DecidableEq` instance on the indexing type.
As this had no pay-off (everything about limits is non-constructive in mathlib),
and occasional cost
(constructing decidability instances appropriate for constructions involving the indexing type),
we made everything classical.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open scoped Classical
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
variable {J : Type w}
universe uC' uC uD' uD
variable {C : Type uC} [Category.{uC'} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type uD} [Category.{uD'} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
/-- A `c : Bicone F` is:
* an object `c.pt` and
* morphisms `π j : pt ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ pt` for each `j`,
* such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
-/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] Porting note (#5171): removed
structure Bicone (F : J → C) where
pt : C
π : ∀ j, pt ⟶ F j
ι : ∀ j, F j ⟶ pt
ι_π : ∀ j j', ι j ≫ π j' =
if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congrArg F h) else 0 := by aesop
#align category_theory.limits.bicone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.pt
attribute [inherit_doc Bicone] Bicone.pt Bicone.π Bicone.ι Bicone.ι_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_self {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.ι j ≫ B.π j = 𝟙 (F j) := by
simpa using B.ι_π j j
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_ι_π_self CategoryTheory.Limits.bicone_ι_π_self
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_ne {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') : B.ι j ≫ B.π j' = 0 := by
simpa [h] using B.ι_π j j'
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_ι_π_ne CategoryTheory.Limits.bicone_ι_π_ne
variable {F : J → C}
/-- A bicone morphism between two bicones for the same diagram is a morphism of the bicone points
which commutes with the cone and cocone legs. -/
structure BiconeMorphism {F : J → C} (A B : Bicone F) where
/-- A morphism between the two vertex objects of the bicones -/
hom : A.pt ⟶ B.pt
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wπ : ∀ j : J, hom ≫ B.π j = A.π j := by aesop_cat
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wι : ∀ j : J, A.ι j ≫ hom = B.ι j := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wι
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wπ
/-- The category of bicones on a given diagram. -/
@[simps]
instance Bicone.category : Category (Bicone F) where
Hom A B := BiconeMorphism A B
comp f g := { hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom }
id B := { hom := 𝟙 B.pt }
-- Porting note: if we do not have `simps` automatically generate the lemma for simplifying
-- the `hom` field of a category, we need to write the `ext` lemma in terms of the categorical
-- morphism, rather than the underlying structure.
@[ext]
theorem BiconeMorphism.ext {c c' : Bicone F} (f g : c ⟶ c') (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
congr
namespace Bicones
/-- To give an isomorphism between cocones, it suffices to give an
isomorphism between their vertices which commutes with the cocone
maps. -/
-- Porting note: `@[ext]` used to accept lemmas like this. Now we add an aesop rule
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory]), simps]
def ext {c c' : Bicone F} (φ : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(wι : ∀ j, c.ι j ≫ φ.hom = c'.ι j := by aesop_cat)
(wπ : ∀ j, φ.hom ≫ c'.π j = c.π j := by aesop_cat) : c ≅ c' where
hom := { hom := φ.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := φ.inv
wι := fun j => φ.comp_inv_eq.mpr (wι j).symm
wπ := fun j => φ.inv_comp_eq.mpr (wπ j).symm }
variable (F) in
/-- A functor `G : C ⥤ D` sends bicones over `F` to bicones over `G.obj ∘ F` functorially. -/
@[simps]
def functoriality (G : C ⥤ D) [Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms G] :
Bicone F ⥤ Bicone (G.obj ∘ F) where
obj A :=
{ pt := G.obj A.pt
π := fun j => G.map (A.π j)
ι := fun j => G.map (A.ι j)
ι_π := fun i j => (Functor.map_comp _ _ _).symm.trans <| by
rw [A.ι_π]
aesop_cat }
map f :=
{ hom := G.map f.hom
wπ := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wπ, ← f.wπ j]
wι := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wι, ← f.wι j] }
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
instance functoriality_full [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Full] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Full where
map_surjective t :=
⟨{ hom := G.preimage t.hom
wι := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wι j)
wπ := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wπ j) }, by aesop_cat⟩
instance functoriality_faithful [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Faithful where
map_injective {_X} {_Y} f g h :=
BiconeMorphism.ext f g <| G.map_injective <| congr_arg BiconeMorphism.hom h
end Bicones
namespace Bicone
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- Extract the cone from a bicone. -/
def toConeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, π := { app := fun j => B.π j.as } }
map {X Y} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wπ _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toConeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCone (B : Bicone F) : Cone (Discrete.functor F) := toConeFunctor.obj B
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone
-- TODO Consider changing this API to `toFan (B : Bicone F) : Fan F`.
@[simp]
theorem toCone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCone.pt = B.pt := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone_pt
@[simp]
theorem toCone_π_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCone.π.app j = B.π j.as := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone_π_app CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone_π_app
theorem toCone_π_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ = B.π j := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone_π_app_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone_π_app_mk
@[simp]
theorem toCone_proj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Fan.proj B.toCone j = B.π j := rfl
/-- Extract the cocone from a bicone. -/
def toCoconeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cocone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, ι := { app := fun j => B.ι j.as } }
map {X Y} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wι _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toCoconeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCocone (B : Bicone F) : Cocone (Discrete.functor F) := toCoconeFunctor.obj B
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCocone.pt = B.pt := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone_pt
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_ι_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCocone.ι.app j = B.ι j.as := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone_ι_app CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone_ι_app
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_inj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Cofan.inj B.toCocone j = B.ι j := rfl
theorem toCocone_ι_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCocone.ι.app ⟨j⟩ = B.ι j := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone_ι_app_mk
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofLimitCone {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsLimit t) : Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := t.π.app ⟨j⟩
ι j := ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι_π j j' := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.of_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.ofLimitCone
theorem ι_of_isLimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) (j : J) :
t.ι j = ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.ι_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.ι_of_isLimit
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofColimitCocone {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι j := t.ι.app ⟨j⟩
ι_π j j' := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.of_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.ofColimitCocone
theorem π_of_isColimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) (j : J) :
t.π j = ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.π_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.π_of_isColimit
/-- Structure witnessing that a bicone is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] Porting note (#5171): removed
structure IsBilimit {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) where
isLimit : IsLimit B.toCone
isColimit : IsColimit B.toCocone
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.IsBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.is_bilimit.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.IsBilimit.isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.is_bilimit.is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.IsBilimit.isColimit
attribute [inherit_doc IsBilimit] IsBilimit.isLimit IsBilimit.isColimit
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this, linter doesn't notice it is removed
attribute [-simp, nolint simpNF] IsBilimit.mk.injEq
attribute [local ext] Bicone.IsBilimit
instance subsingleton_isBilimit {f : J → C} {c : Bicone f} : Subsingleton c.IsBilimit :=
⟨fun _ _ => Bicone.IsBilimit.ext _ _ (Subsingleton.elim _ _) (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.subsingleton_is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.subsingleton_isBilimit
section Whisker
variable {K : Type w'}
/-- Whisker a bicone with an equivalence between the indexing types. -/
@[simps]
def whisker {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) : Bicone (f ∘ g) where
pt := c.pt
π k := c.π (g k)
ι k := c.ι (g k)
ι_π k k' := by
simp only [c.ι_π]
split_ifs with h h' h' <;> simp [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq g] at h h' <;> tauto
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whisker
/-- Taking the cone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cone and postcomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCone ≅
(Cones.postcompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).inv).obj
(c.toCone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker_to_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whiskerToCone
/-- Taking the cocone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cocone and precomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCocone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCocone ≅
(Cocones.precompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).hom).obj
(c.toCocone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker_to_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whiskerToCocone
/-- Whiskering a bicone with an equivalence between types preserves being a bilimit bicone. -/
def whiskerIsBilimitIff {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).IsBilimit ≃ c.IsBilimit := by
refine equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩) fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· let this := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc.isLimit (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g)
let this := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _) this
exact IsLimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· let this := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc.isColimit (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g)
let this := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _) this
exact IsColimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g).symm
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _).symm _
exact IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isLimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
· apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g).symm
apply (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _).symm _
exact IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isColimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker_is_bilimit_iff CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whiskerIsBilimitIff
end Whisker
end Bicone
/-- A bicone over `F : J → C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone.
-/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note(#5171): removed; linter not ported yet
structure LimitBicone (F : J → C) where
bicone : Bicone F
isBilimit : bicone.IsBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit_bicone CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitBicone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_bicone.is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitBicone.isBilimit
attribute [inherit_doc LimitBicone] LimitBicone.bicone LimitBicone.isBilimit
/-- `HasBiproduct F` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `F`.
-/
class HasBiproduct (F : J → C) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_biproduct : Nonempty (LimitBicone F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct
attribute [inherit_doc HasBiproduct] HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
theorem HasBiproduct.mk {F : J → C} (d : LimitBicone F) : HasBiproduct F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproduct.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct.mk
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `BiproductData F` from `HasBiproduct F`. -/
def getBiproductData (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : LimitBicone F :=
Classical.choice HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
#align category_theory.limits.get_biproduct_data CategoryTheory.Limits.getBiproductData
/-- A bicone for `F` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.bicone (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Bicone F :=
(getBiproductData F).bicone
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.bicone CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.bicone
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a bilimit bicone. -/
def biproduct.isBilimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : (biproduct.bicone F).IsBilimit :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isBilimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a limit cone. -/
def biproduct.isLimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsLimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isLimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.isColimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsColimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isColimit
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasProduct F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCone
isLimit := biproduct.isLimit F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_product_of_has_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasCoproduct F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone
isColimit := biproduct.isColimit F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproduct_of_has_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has biproducts of shape `J` if we have
a limit and a colimit, with the same cone points,
of every function `F : J → C`.
-/
class HasBiproductsOfShape : Prop where
has_biproduct : ∀ F : J → C, HasBiproduct F
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproducts_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproductsOfShape
attribute [instance 100] HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct
/-- `HasFiniteBiproducts C` represents a choice of biproduct for every family of objects in `C`
indexed by a finite type. -/
class HasFiniteBiproducts : Prop where
out : ∀ n, HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.HasFiniteBiproducts
attribute [inherit_doc HasFiniteBiproducts] HasFiniteBiproducts.out
variable {J}
theorem hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv {K : Type w'} [HasBiproductsOfShape K C] (e : J ≃ K) :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C :=
⟨fun F =>
let ⟨⟨h⟩⟩ := HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct (F ∘ e.symm)
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
HasBiproduct.mk <| by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), e.symm_apply_apply] using
LimitBicone.mk (c.whisker e) ((c.whiskerIsBilimitIff _).2 hc)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproducts_of_shape_of_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv
instance (priority := 100) hasBiproductsOfShape_finite [HasFiniteBiproducts C] [Finite J] :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin J with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
haveI : HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C := HasFiniteBiproducts.out n
exact hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv C e
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproducts_of_shape_finite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBiproductsOfShape_finite
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteProducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasLimitOfIso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_of_has_finite_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteCoproducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasColimitOfIso Discrete.natIsoFunctor⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_of_has_finite_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts
variable {C}
/-- The isomorphism between the specified limit and the specified colimit for
a functor with a bilimit.
-/
def biproductIso (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Limits.piObj F ≅ Limits.sigmaObj F :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) (biproduct.isLimit F)).trans <|
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.biproductIso
end Limits
namespace Limits
variable {J : Type w} {K : Type*}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- `biproduct f` computes the biproduct of a family of elements `f`. (It is defined as an
abbreviation for `limit (Discrete.functor f)`, so for most facts about `biproduct f`, you will
just use general facts about limits and colimits.) -/
abbrev biproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : C :=
(biproduct.bicone f).pt
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct
@[inherit_doc biproduct]
notation "⨁ " f:20 => biproduct f
/-- The projection onto a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : ⨁ f ⟶ f b :=
(biproduct.bicone f).π b
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.π
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).π b = biproduct.π f b := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.bicone_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.bicone_π
/-- The inclusion into a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : f b ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b = biproduct.ι f b := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.bicone_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.bicone_ι
/-- Note that as this lemma has an `if` in the statement, we include a `DecidableEq` argument.
This means you may not be able to `simp` using this lemma unless you `open scoped Classical`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_π [DecidableEq J] (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j j' : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0 := by
convert (biproduct.bicone f).ι_π j j'
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_π
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both versions proven by simp
theorem biproduct.ι_π_self (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j = 𝟙 _ := by simp [biproduct.ι_π]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_π_self CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_π_self
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_π_ne (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = 0 := by simp [biproduct.ι_π, h]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_π_ne CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_π_ne
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.eqToHom_comp_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ biproduct.ι f j' = biproduct.ι f j := by
cases w
simp
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.π_comp_eqToHom (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
biproduct.π f j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = biproduct.π f j' := by
cases w
simp
/-- Given a collection of maps into the summands, we obtain a map into the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.lift {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).lift (Fan.mk P p)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift
/-- Given a collection of maps out of the summands, we obtain a map out of the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : ⨁ f ⟶ P :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).desc (Cofan.mk P p)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.desc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_π {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) (j : J) :
biproduct.lift p ≫ biproduct.π f j = p j := (biproduct.isLimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.desc p = p j := (biproduct.isColimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_desc
/-- Given a collection of maps between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain a map between the biproducts. -/
abbrev biproduct.map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsLimit.map (biproduct.bicone f).toCone (biproduct.isLimit g)
(Discrete.natTrans (fun j => p j.as))
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map
/-- An alternative to `biproduct.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biproduct.map`. -/
abbrev biproduct.map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsColimit.map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map' CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map'
-- We put this at slightly higher priority than `biproduct.hom_ext'`,
-- to get the matrix indices in the "right" order.
@[ext 1001]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ ⨁ f)
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ biproduct.π f j = h ≫ biproduct.π f j) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.hom_ext
@[ext]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext' {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : ⨁ f ⟶ Z)
(w : ∀ j, biproduct.ι f j ≫ g = biproduct.ι f j ≫ h) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.hom_ext' CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.hom_ext'
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen product. -/
def biproduct.isoProduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∏ᶜ f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit f) (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_product CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoProduct
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).hom = Pi.lift (biproduct.π f) :=
limit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoProduct]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_product_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoProduct_hom
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).inv = biproduct.lift (Pi.π f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_product_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoProduct_inv
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen coproduct. -/
def biproduct.isoCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∐ f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit f) (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_coproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoCoproduct
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).inv = Sigma.desc (biproduct.ι f) :=
colimit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoCoproduct]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_coproduct_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).hom = biproduct.desc (Sigma.ι f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ fun j => by simp [← Iso.eq_comp_inv]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_coproduct_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoCoproduct_hom
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 619 | 630 | theorem biproduct.map_eq_map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
biproduct.map p = biproduct.map' p := by |
ext
dsimp
simp only [Discrete.natTrans_app, Limits.IsColimit.ι_map_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.map_π,
Category.assoc, ← Bicone.toCone_π_app_mk, ← biproduct.bicone_π, ← Bicone.toCocone_ι_app_mk,
← biproduct.bicone_ι]
dsimp
rw [biproduct.ι_π_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; rw [eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]; erw [Category.comp_id]
· simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetToL1
#align_import measure_theory.integral.bochner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `SetToL1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal * x`.
`weightedSMul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `DominatedFinMeasAdditive`
(defined in the file `SetToL1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `SimpleFunc α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `SimpleFunc.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simpleFunc α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simpleFunc.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `ContinuousLinearMap.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `setToFun` (which are described in the
file `SetToL1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` :
`∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. (In the file `DominatedConvergence`)
`tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `SetIntegral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm`
* `LinearIsometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `Integrable.induction` in the file `SimpleFuncDenseLp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` for a complicated example, which proves
that `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part`
is scattered in sections with the name `posPart`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal <| ‖f a‖)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `isClosed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `isClosed_property` or `DenseRange.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/Integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`MeasureTheory/LpSpace`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/SimpleFuncDense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`MeasureTheory/SetIntegral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Differentiable
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section WeightedSMul
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `fun x => (μ s).toReal • x`. The extension
of that set function through `setToL1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).toReal • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) (x : F) :
weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal • x := by simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_apply MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} :
weightedSMul (0 : Measure α) = (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1; simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_zero_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_empty {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
weightedSMul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_empty MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_empty
theorem weightedSMul_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weightedSMul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul ν s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
rw [Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.toReal_add hμs hνs, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_add_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_add_measure
theorem weightedSMul_smul_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} :
(weightedSMul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.toReal • weightedSMul μ s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, smul_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul_measure
theorem weightedSMul_congr (s t : Set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr 2
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_congr MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_congr
theorem weightedSMul_null {s : Set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 := by
ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply, h_zero]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_null MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_null
theorem weightedSMul_union' (s t : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [add_apply, weightedSMul_apply,
measure_union (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ENNReal.toReal_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union' MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union'
@[nolint unusedArguments]
theorem weightedSMul_union (s t : Set α) (_hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t :=
weightedSMul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union
theorem weightedSMul_smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (c : 𝕜)
(s : Set α) (x : F) : weightedSMul μ s (c • x) = c • weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul
theorem norm_weightedSMul_le (s : Set α) : ‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal :=
calc
‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ = ‖(μ s).toReal‖ * ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F‖ :=
norm_smul (μ s).toReal (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F)
_ ≤ ‖(μ s).toReal‖ :=
((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le)
_ = abs (μ s).toReal := Real.norm_eq_abs _
_ = (μ s).toReal := abs_eq_self.mpr ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.norm_weighted_smul_le MeasureTheory.norm_weightedSMul_le
theorem dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul μ : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weightedSMul_union, fun s _ _ => (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul MeasureTheory.dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_nonneg (s : Set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp only [weightedSMul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', _root_.id, coe_id', Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_nonneg toReal_nonneg hx
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_nonneg
end WeightedSMul
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section PosPart
variable [LinearOrder E] [Zero E] [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- Positive part of a simple function. -/
def posPart (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
f.map fun b => max b 0
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function. -/
def negPart [Neg E] (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart
theorem posPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (posPart f).map norm = posPart f := by
ext; rw [map_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]; exact le_max_right _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm
theorem negPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (negPart f).map norm = negPart f := by
rw [negPart]; exact posPart_map_norm _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm
theorem posPart_sub_negPart (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : f.posPart - f.negPart = f := by
simp only [posPart, negPart]
ext a
rw [coe_sub]
exact max_zero_sub_eq_self (f a)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_sub_neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_sub_negPart
end PosPart
section Integral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of simple functions
Define the Bochner integral of simple functions of the type `α →ₛ β` where `β` is a normed group,
and prove basic property of this integral.
-/
open Finset
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {G F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α}
/-- Bochner integral of simple functions whose codomain is a real `NormedSpace`.
This is equal to `∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x` (see `integral_eq`). -/
def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) : F :=
f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_def MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_def
theorem integral_eq {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
simp [integral, setToSimpleFunc, weightedSMul_apply]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_sum_filter [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [integral_def, setToSimpleFunc_eq_sum_filter]; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_filter MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter
/-- The Bochner integral is equal to a sum over any set that includes `f.range` (except `0`). -/
theorem integral_eq_sum_of_subset [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {f : α →ₛ F} {s : Finset F}
(hs : (f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ s) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter, Finset.sum_subset hs]
rintro x - hx; rw [Finset.mem_filter, not_and_or, Ne, Classical.not_not] at hx
-- Porting note: reordered for clarity
rcases hx.symm with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range] at hx
-- Porting note: added
simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists] at hx
rw [preimage_eq_empty] <;> simp [Set.disjoint_singleton_left, hx]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_of_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem integral_const {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (y : F) :
(const α y).integral μ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by
classical
calc
(const α y).integral μ = ∑ z ∈ {y}, (μ (const α y ⁻¹' {z})).toReal • z :=
integral_eq_sum_of_subset <| (filter_subset _ _).trans (range_const_subset _ _)
_ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by simp [Set.preimage] -- Porting note: added `Set.preimage`
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_piecewise_zero {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (piecewise s hs f 0).integral μ = f.integral (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
refine (integral_eq_sum_of_subset ?_).trans
((sum_congr rfl fun y hy => ?_).trans (integral_eq_sum_filter _ _).symm)
· intro y hy
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator,
mem_range_indicator] at *
rcases hy with ⟨⟨rfl, -⟩ | ⟨x, -, rfl⟩, h₀⟩
exacts [(h₀ rfl).elim, ⟨Set.mem_range_self _, h₀⟩]
· dsimp
rw [Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem,
Measure.restrict_apply (f.measurableSet_preimage _)]
exact fun h₀ => (mem_filter.1 hy).2 (Eq.symm h₀)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_piecewise_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_piecewise_zero
/-- Calculate the integral of `g ∘ f : α →ₛ F`, where `f` is an integrable function from `α` to `E`
and `g` is a function from `E` to `F`. We require `g 0 = 0` so that `g ∘ f` is integrable. -/
theorem map_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (g : E → F) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
(f.map g).integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • g x :=
map_setToSimpleFunc _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_integral
/-- `SimpleFunc.integral` and `SimpleFunc.lintegral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion.
See `integral_eq_lintegral` for a simpler version. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral' {f : α →ₛ E} {g : E → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg0 : g 0 = 0)
(ht : ∀ b, g b ≠ ∞) :
(f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ g)).integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ) := by
have hf' : f.FinMeasSupp μ := integrable_iff_finMeasSupp.1 hf
simp only [← map_apply g f, lintegral_eq_lintegral]
rw [map_integral f _ hf, map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => ?_
-- Porting note: added `Function.comp_apply`
rw [smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, mul_comm, Function.comp_apply]
· rintro a -
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· rw [a0, hg0, zero_mul]; exact WithTop.zero_ne_top
· apply mul_ne_top (ht a) (hf'.meas_preimage_singleton_ne_zero a0).ne
· simp [hg0]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral'
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem integral_congr {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f.integral μ = g.integral μ :=
setToSimpleFunc_congr (weightedSMul μ) (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union hf h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
/-- `SimpleFunc.bintegral` and `SimpleFunc.integral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →ₛ ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
f.integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ ENNReal.ofReal) :=
h_pos.mono fun a h => (ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h).symm
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral' hf]
exacts [integral_congr hf this, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, fun b => ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_add {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f + g) = integral μ f + integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_add _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_neg {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) : integral μ (-f) = -integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_neg _ weightedSMul_union hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_neg MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_neg
theorem integral_sub {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f - g) = integral μ f - integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_sub _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_sub MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_sub
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
integral μ (c • f) = c • integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_smul _ weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal) {f : α →ₛ E}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * (f.map norm).integral μ :=
calc
‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) * ‖x‖ :=
norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm f hf
_ = C * (f.map norm).integral μ := by
rw [map_integral f norm hf norm_zero]; simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_set_to_simple_func_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖f.integral μ‖ ≤ (f.map norm).integral μ := by
refine (norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm _ (fun s _ _ => ?_) hf).trans (one_mul _).le
exact (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_integral_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
theorem integral_add_measure {ν} (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
f.integral (μ + ν) = f.integral μ + f.integral ν := by
simp_rw [integral_def]
refine setToSimpleFunc_add_left'
(weightedSMul μ) (weightedSMul ν) (weightedSMul (μ + ν)) (fun s _ hμνs => ?_) hf
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.add_ne_top] at hμνs
rw [weightedSMul_add_measure _ _ hμνs.1 hμνs.2]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add_measure
end Integral
end SimpleFunc
namespace L1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `L1`
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖f‖ = ((toSimpleFunc f).map norm).integral μ := by
rw [norm_eq_sum_mul f, (toSimpleFunc f).map_integral norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f) norm_zero]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_eq_integral
section PosPart
/-- Positive part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
nonrec def posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
⟨Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ), by
rcases f with ⟨f, s, hsf⟩
use s.posPart
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Lp.coe_posPart, ← hsf, AEEqFun.posPart_mk,
SimpleFunc.coe_map, mk_eq_mk]
-- Porting note: added
simp [SimpleFunc.posPart, Function.comp, EventuallyEq.rfl] ⟩
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
def negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (posPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_posPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (negPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.negPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_negPart
end PosPart
section SimpleFuncIntegral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of `L1`
Define the Bochner integral on `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` by extension from the simple functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`,
and prove basic properties of this integral. -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] {F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space. -/
def integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : E :=
(toSimpleFunc f).integral μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral
nonrec theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ} (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc f) :
integral f = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((toSimpleFunc f) a) ∂μ) := by
rw [integral, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h_pos]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_eq_setToL1S (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = setToL1S (weightedSMul μ) f := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_set_to_L1s MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_setToL1S
nonrec theorem integral_congr {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
integral f = integral g :=
SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g :=
setToL1S_add _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union _ _
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f :=
setToL1S_smul _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_integral_le_norm (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := by
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral]
exact (toSimpleFunc f).norm_integral_le_integral_norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_integral_le_norm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_norm
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
def integralCLM' : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous ⟨⟨integral, integral_add⟩, integral_smul⟩ 1 fun f =>
le_trans (norm_integral_le_norm _) <| by rw [one_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM'
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' α E ℝ μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
local notation "Integral" => integralCLM α E μ
open ContinuousLinearMap
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖Integral‖ ≤ 1 :=
-- Porting note: Old proof was `LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _`
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one (fun f => by
rw [one_mul]
exact norm_integral_le_norm f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_Integral_le_one
section PosPart
theorem posPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (posPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).posPart := by
have eq : ∀ a, (toSimpleFunc f).posPart a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := fun a => rfl
have ae_eq : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, toSimpleFunc (posPart f) a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (posPart f), Lp.coeFn_posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ),
toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f] with _ _ h₂ h₃
convert h₂ using 1
-- Porting note: added
rw [h₃]
refine ae_eq.mono fun a h => ?_
rw [h, eq]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem negPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (negPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).negPart := by
rw [SimpleFunc.negPart, MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart]
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc (-f), neg_toSimpleFunc f]
intro a h₁ h₂
rw [h₁]
show max _ _ = max _ _
rw [h₂]
rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : integral f = ‖posPart f‖ - ‖negPart f‖ := by
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₁ : (toSimpleFunc f).posPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₂ : (toSimpleFunc f).negPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [negPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral, norm_eq_integral, ← SimpleFunc.integral_sub]
· show (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ =
((toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm - (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm).integral μ
apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
filter_upwards [ae_eq₁, ae_eq₂] with _ h₁ h₂
show _ = _ - _
rw [← h₁, ← h₂]
have := (toSimpleFunc f).posPart_sub_negPart
conv_lhs => rw [← this]
rfl
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).pos_part.congr ae_eq₁
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).neg_part.congr ae_eq₂
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end SimpleFuncIntegral
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ _ _ _ μ _
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace E]
section IntegrationInL1
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable (𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
nonrec def integralCLM' : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
(integralCLM' α E 𝕜 μ).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.uniformInducing
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM'
variable {𝕜}
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' ℝ
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM
-- Porting note: added `(E := E)` in several places below.
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space -/
irreducible_def integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : E :=
integralCLM (E := E) f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral
theorem integral_eq (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral f = integralCLM (E := E) f := by
simp only [integral]
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToL1 (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
integral f = setToL1 (E := E) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_set_to_L1 MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_setToL1
@[norm_cast]
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
L1.integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) = SimpleFunc.integral f := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral]
exact setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_L1_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral
variable (α E)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : integral (0 : α →₁[μ] E) = 0 := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_zero integralCLM
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_zero MeasureTheory.L1.integral_zero
variable {α E}
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_add integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.integral_add
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (-f) = -integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_neg integralCLM f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_neg MeasureTheory.L1.integral_neg
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_sub (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f - g) = integral f - integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_sub integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_sub
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f := by
simp only [integral]
show (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) (c • f) = c • (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) f
exact map_smul (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) c f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.integral_smul
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ μ _ _
local notation "sIntegral" => @SimpleFunc.integralCLM α E _ _ μ _
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ ≤ 1 :=
norm_setToL1_le (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) zero_le_one
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one
theorem nnnorm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_Integral_le_one
theorem norm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖integral f‖ = ‖integralCLM (E := E) f‖ := by simp only [integral]
_ ≤ ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ * ‖f‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ 1 * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right norm_Integral_le_one <| norm_nonneg _
_ = ‖f‖ := one_mul _
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_integral_le MeasureTheory.L1.norm_integral_le
theorem nnnorm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ :=
norm_integral_le f
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact L1.integralCLM.continuous
#align measure_theory.L1.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.L1.continuous_integral
section PosPart
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) :
integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖ := by
-- Use `isClosed_property` and `isClosed_eq`
refine @isClosed_property _ _ _ ((↑) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) → α →₁[μ] ℝ)
(fun f : α →₁[μ] ℝ => integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) (isClosed_eq ?_ ?_) ?_ f
· simp only [integral]
exact cont _
· refine Continuous.sub (continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_posPart)
(continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_negPart)
-- Show that the property holds for all simple functions in the `L¹` space.
· intro s
norm_cast
exact SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end IntegrationInL1
end L1
/-!
## The Bochner integral on functions
Define the Bochner integral on functions generally to be the `L1` Bochner integral, for integrable
functions, and 0 otherwise; prove its basic properties.
-/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [hE : CompleteSpace E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
{G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section
open scoped Classical
/-- The Bochner integral -/
irreducible_def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → G) : G :=
if _ : CompleteSpace G then
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.integral MeasureTheory.integral
end
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => integral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => integral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
section Properties
open ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
variable {f g : α → E} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem integral_eq (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) := by
simp [integral, hE, hf]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq MeasureTheory.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToFun (f : α → E) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = setToFun μ (weightedSMul μ) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral, hE, L1.integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_set_to_fun MeasureTheory.integral_eq_setToFun
theorem L1.integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : L1.integral f = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral, integral_eq_setToFun]
exact (L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_integral
theorem integral_undef {f : α → G} (h : ¬Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp [integral, hG, h]
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_undef MeasureTheory.integral_undef
theorem Integrable.of_integral_ne_zero {f : α → G} (h : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≠ 0) : Integrable f μ :=
Not.imp_symm integral_undef h
theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → G} (h : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_undef <| not_and_of_not_left _ h
#align measure_theory.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
variable (α G)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : ∫ _ : α, (0 : G) ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_zero (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_zero MeasureTheory.integral_zero
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero' : integral μ (0 : α → G) = 0 :=
integral_zero α G
#align measure_theory.integral_zero' MeasureTheory.integral_zero'
variable {α G}
theorem integrable_of_integral_eq_one {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1) : Integrable f μ :=
.of_integral_ne_zero <| h ▸ one_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one MeasureTheory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one
theorem integral_add {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_add (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_add MeasureTheory.integral_add
theorem integral_add' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f + g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_add hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_add' MeasureTheory.integral_add'
theorem integral_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → G} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
∫ a, ∑ i ∈ s, f i a ∂μ = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ a, f i a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_finset_sum (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) s hf
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.integral_finset_sum
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α → G) : ∫ a, -f a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_neg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_neg MeasureTheory.integral_neg
theorem integral_neg' (f : α → G) : ∫ a, (-f) a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
#align measure_theory.integral_neg' MeasureTheory.integral_neg'
theorem integral_sub {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_sub (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_sub MeasureTheory.integral_sub
theorem integral_sub' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f - g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_sub hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_sub' MeasureTheory.integral_sub'
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 G] (c : 𝕜) (f : α → G) :
∫ a, c • f a ∂μ = c • ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_smul (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) weightedSMul_smul c f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_smul MeasureTheory.integral_smul
theorem integral_mul_left {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_smul r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_left MeasureTheory.integral_mul_left
theorem integral_mul_right {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by
simp only [mul_comm]; exact integral_mul_left r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_right MeasureTheory.integral_mul_right
theorem integral_div {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a / r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) / r := by
simpa only [← div_eq_mul_inv] using integral_mul_right r⁻¹ f
#align measure_theory.integral_div MeasureTheory.integral_div
theorem integral_congr_ae {f g : α → G} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_congr_ae (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) h
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.integral_congr_ae
-- Porting note: `nolint simpNF` added because simplify fails on left-hand side
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, (hf.toL1 f) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [MeasureTheory.integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_toL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf
· simp [MeasureTheory.integral, hG]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G => ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.continuous_integral
theorem norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm (f : α → G) :
‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq f hf, ← Integrable.norm_toL1_eq_lintegral_norm f hf]
exact L1.norm_integral_le _
· rw [integral_undef hf, norm_zero]; exact toReal_nonneg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm
theorem ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm (f : α → G) :
(‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
exact norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm f
#align measure_theory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm MeasureTheory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_ae {f : α → G} (hf : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
simp [integral_congr_ae hf, integral_zero]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G}
(hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_zero, NNReal.tendsto_coe, ← ENNReal.tendsto_coe,
ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_set_lintegral_zero (ne_of_lt hf) hs) (fun i => zero_le _)
fun i => ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `f` is integrable, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ)
{l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) :=
hf.2.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero hs
#align measure_theory.integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias Integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ)
(hF : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f hfi hFi hF
· simp [integral, hG, tendsto_const_nhds]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_of_L1 MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_integral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi.restrict ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [hFi] with i hi using hi.restrict
· simp_rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm] at hF ⊢
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds hF (fun _ ↦ zero_le')
(fun _ ↦ snorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1 := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_ s
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1' := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1'
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => F x a) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousWithinAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_within_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousWithinAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousAt (fun x => F x a) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousOn_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousOn (fun x => F x a) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousOn_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousOn_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_on_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousOn_of_dominated
theorem continuous_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ) (h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ) (h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Continuous fun x => F x a) :
Continuous fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuous_of_dominated
/-- The Bochner integral of a real-valued function `f : α → ℝ` is the difference between the
integral of the positive part of `f` and the integral of the negative part of `f`. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ =
ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (f a) ∂μ) - ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) := by
let f₁ := hf.toL1 f
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₁ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.posPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_posPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (le_max_right _ _)]
rw [Real.coe_toNNReal', NNReal.coe_mk]
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₂ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.negPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_negPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_neg]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _), ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
rw [eq₁, eq₂, integral, dif_pos, dif_pos]
exact L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part hfi]
have h_min : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· refine hf.mono ?_
simp only [Pi.zero_apply]
intro a h
simp only [h, neg_nonpos, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfm.aemeasurable.neg
rw [h_min, zero_toReal, _root_.sub_zero]
· rw [integral_undef hfi]
simp_rw [Integrable, hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, true_and_iff,
Classical.not_not] at hfi
have : ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae (hf.mono fun a h => ?_)
dsimp only
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h]
rw [this, hfi]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hf.norm]
· simp_rw [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
· filter_upwards; simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
#align measure_theory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.aestronglyMeasurable,
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hf.2)]
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (f a) : ℝ) ∂μ - ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (-f a) : ℝ) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_sub hf.real_toNNReal]
· simp
· exact hf.neg.real_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part
theorem integral_nonneg_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : CompleteSpace ℝ := by infer_instance
simp only [integral_def, A, L1.integral_def, dite_true, ge_iff_le]
exact setToFun_nonneg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
(fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_nonneg s) hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg_of_ae
theorem lintegral_coe_eq_integral (f : α → ℝ≥0) (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => (f x).coe_nonneg)
hfi.aestronglyMeasurable, ← ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]
convert hfi.hasFiniteIntegral
-- Porting note: `convert` no longer unfolds `HasFiniteIntegral`
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, NNReal.nnnorm_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 1,204 | 1,209 | theorem ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, f x ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by |
have : f =ᵐ[μ] (‖f ·‖) := f_nn.mono fun _x hx ↦ (abs_of_nonneg hx).symm
simp_rw [integral_congr_ae this, ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hfi,
← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (this.symm.fun_comp ENNReal.ofReal)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sigma
#align_import data.finset.sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Finite sets in a sigma type
This file defines a few `Finset` constructions on `Σ i, α i`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sigma`: Given a finset `s` in `ι` and finsets `t i` in each `α i`, `s.sigma t` is the
finset of the dependent sum `Σ i, α i`
* `Finset.sigmaLift`: Lifts maps `α i → β i → Finset (γ i)` to a map
`Σ i, α i → Σ i, β i → Finset (Σ i, γ i)`.
## TODO
`Finset.sigmaLift` can be generalized to any alternative functor. But to make the generalization
worth it, we must first refactor the functor library so that the `alternative` instance for `Finset`
is computable and universe-polymorphic.
-/
open Function Multiset
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sigma
variable {α : ι → Type*} {β : Type*} (s s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
/-- `s.sigma t` is the finset of dependent pairs `⟨i, a⟩` such that `i ∈ s` and `a ∈ t i`. -/
protected def sigma : Finset (Σi, α i) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.sigma fun i => (t i).nodup⟩
#align finset.sigma Finset.sigma
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sigma {a : Σi, α i} : a ∈ s.sigma t ↔ a.1 ∈ s ∧ a.2 ∈ t a.1 :=
Multiset.mem_sigma
#align finset.mem_sigma Finset.mem_sigma
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
(s.sigma t : Set (Σ i, α i)) = (s : Set ι).sigma fun i ↦ (t i : Set (α i)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_sigma
#align finset.coe_sigma Finset.coe_sigma
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem sigma_nonempty : (s.sigma t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, (t i).Nonempty := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.sigma_nonempty Finset.sigma_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem sigma_eq_empty : s.sigma t = ∅ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, t i = ∅ := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, sigma_nonempty, not_exists, not_and]
#align finset.sigma_eq_empty Finset.sigma_eq_empty
@[mono]
theorem sigma_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : ∀ i, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : s₁.sigma t₁ ⊆ s₂.sigma t₂ :=
fun ⟨i, _⟩ h =>
let ⟨hi, ha⟩ := mem_sigma.1 h
mem_sigma.2 ⟨hs hi, ht i ha⟩
#align finset.sigma_mono Finset.sigma_mono
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk :
(s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i) := by
intro i _ j _ hij
rw [Function.onFun, disjoint_left]
simp_rw [mem_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
rintro _ ⟨y, _, rfl⟩ ⟨z, _, hz'⟩
exact hij (congr_arg Sigma.fst hz'.symm)
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_map_sigma_mk Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk
@[simp]
theorem disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk :
s.disjiUnion (fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i)) pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk =
s.sigma t :=
rfl
#align finset.disj_Union_map_sigma_mk Finset.disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk
theorem sigma_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (Σi, α i)] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
s.sigma t = s.biUnion fun i => (t i).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk i := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm]
#align finset.sigma_eq_bUnion Finset.sigma_eq_biUnion
variable (s t) (f : (Σi, α i) → β)
theorem sup_sigma [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] :
(s.sigma t).sup f = s.sup fun i => (t i).sup fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_sigma, and_imp, Sigma.forall]
exact
⟨fun i a hi ha => (le_sup hi).trans' <| le_sup (f := fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) ha, fun i hi a ha =>
le_sup <| mem_sigma.2 ⟨hi, ha⟩⟩
#align finset.sup_sigma Finset.sup_sigma
theorem inf_sigma [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] :
(s.sigma t).inf f = s.inf fun i => (t i).inf fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩ :=
@sup_sigma _ _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sigma Finset.inf_sigma
theorem _root_.biSup_finsetSigma [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → β) : ⨆ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⨆ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f ⟨i, j⟩ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.iSup_coe, Finset.coe_sigma, biSup_sigma]
theorem _root_.biSup_finsetSigma' [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → β) : ⨆ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f i j = ⨆ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
Eq.symm (biSup_finsetSigma _ _ _)
theorem _root_.biInf_finsetSigma [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → β) : ⨅ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⨅ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biSup_finsetSigma (β := βᵒᵈ) _ _ _
theorem _root_.biInf_finsetSigma' [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → β) : ⨅ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f i j = ⨅ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
Eq.symm (biInf_finsetSigma _ _ _)
theorem _root_.Set.biUnion_finsetSigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → Set β) : ⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j ∈ t i, f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biSup_finsetSigma _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biUnion_finsetSigma' (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → Set β) : ⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j ∈ t i, f i j = ⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
biSup_finsetSigma' _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biInter_finsetSigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → Set β) : ⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j ∈ t i, f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biInf_finsetSigma _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biInter_finsetSigma' (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → Set β) : ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j ∈ t i, f i j = ⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.1 ij.2 :=
biInf_finsetSigma' _ _ _
end Sigma
section SigmaLift
variable {α β γ : ι → Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Lifts maps `α i → β i → Finset (γ i)` to a map `Σ i, α i → Σ i, β i → Finset (Σ i, γ i)`. -/
def sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β) :
Finset (Sigma γ) :=
dite (a.1 = b.1) (fun h => (f (h ▸ a.2) b.2).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk _) fun _ => ∅
#align finset.sigma_lift Finset.sigmaLift
theorem mem_sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β)
(x : Sigma γ) :
x ∈ sigmaLift f a b ↔ ∃ (ha : a.1 = x.1) (hb : b.1 = x.1), x.2 ∈ f (ha ▸ a.2) (hb ▸ b.2) := by
obtain ⟨⟨i, a⟩, j, b⟩ := a, b
obtain rfl | h := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· constructor
· simp_rw [sigmaLift]
simp only [dite_eq_ite, ite_true, mem_map, Embedding.sigmaMk_apply, forall_exists_index,
and_imp]
rintro x hx rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, hx⟩
rw [sigmaLift, dif_pos rfl, mem_map]
exact ⟨_, hx, by simp [Sigma.ext_iff]⟩
· rw [sigmaLift, dif_neg h]
refine iff_of_false (not_mem_empty _) ?_
rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, _⟩
exact h rfl
#align finset.mem_sigma_lift Finset.mem_sigmaLift
theorem mk_mem_sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (i : ι) (a : α i) (b : β i)
(x : γ i) : (⟨i, x⟩ : Sigma γ) ∈ sigmaLift f ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨i, b⟩ ↔ x ∈ f a b := by
rw [sigmaLift, dif_pos rfl, mem_map]
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx, _, rfl⟩
exact hx
#align finset.mk_mem_sigma_lift Finset.mk_mem_sigmaLift
theorem not_mem_sigmaLift_of_ne_left (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α)
(b : Sigma β) (x : Sigma γ) (h : a.1 ≠ x.1) : x ∉ sigmaLift f a b := by
rw [mem_sigmaLift]
exact fun H => h H.fst
#align finset.not_mem_sigma_lift_of_ne_left Finset.not_mem_sigmaLift_of_ne_left
theorem not_mem_sigmaLift_of_ne_right (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) {a : Sigma α}
(b : Sigma β) {x : Sigma γ} (h : b.1 ≠ x.1) : x ∉ sigmaLift f a b := by
rw [mem_sigmaLift]
exact fun H => h H.snd.fst
#align finset.not_mem_sigma_lift_of_ne_right Finset.not_mem_sigmaLift_of_ne_right
variable {f g : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)} {a : Σi, α i} {b : Σi, β i}
theorem sigmaLift_nonempty :
(sigmaLift f a b).Nonempty ↔ ∃ h : a.1 = b.1, (f (h ▸ a.2) b.2).Nonempty := by
simp_rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sigmaLift]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align finset.sigma_lift_nonempty Finset.sigmaLift_nonempty
theorem sigmaLift_eq_empty : sigmaLift f a b = ∅ ↔ ∀ h : a.1 = b.1, f (h ▸ a.2) b.2 = ∅ := by
simp_rw [sigmaLift]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, forall_prop_of_true h]
· simp [h, forall_prop_of_false h]
#align finset.sigma_lift_eq_empty Finset.sigmaLift_eq_empty
theorem sigmaLift_mono (h : ∀ ⦃i⦄ ⦃a : α i⦄ ⦃b : β i⦄, f a b ⊆ g a b) (a : Σi, α i) (b : Σi, β i) :
sigmaLift f a b ⊆ sigmaLift g a b := by
rintro x hx
rw [mem_sigmaLift] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨ha, hb, hx⟩ := hx
exact ⟨ha, hb, h hx⟩
#align finset.sigma_lift_mono Finset.sigmaLift_mono
variable (f a b)
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sigma.lean | 221 | 224 | theorem card_sigmaLift :
(sigmaLift f a b).card = dite (a.1 = b.1) (fun h => (f (h ▸ a.2) b.2).card) fun _ => 0 := by |
simp_rw [sigmaLift]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.integral.interval_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Integral over an interval
In this file we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ` if `a ≤ b` and
`-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ` if `b ≤ a`.
## Implementation notes
### Avoiding `if`, `min`, and `max`
In order to avoid `if`s in the definition, we define `IntervalIntegrable f μ a b` as
`integrable_on f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ integrable_on f (Ioc b a) μ`. For any `a`, `b` one of these
intervals is empty and the other coincides with `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)`.
Similarly, we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`.
Again, for any `a`, `b` one of these integrals is zero, and the other gives the expected result.
This way some properties can be translated from integrals over sets without dealing with
the cases `a ≤ b` and `b ≤ a` separately.
### Choice of the interval
We use integral over `Set.uIoc a b = Set.Ioc (min a b) (max a b)` instead of one of the other
three possible intervals with the same endpoints for two reasons:
* this way `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ` holds whenever
`f` is integrable on each interval; in particular, it works even if the measure `μ` has an atom
at `b`; this rules out `Set.Ioo` and `Set.Icc` intervals;
* with this definition for a probability measure `μ`, the integral `∫ x in a..b, 1 ∂μ` equals
the difference $F_μ(b)-F_μ(a)$, where $F_μ(a)=μ(-∞, a]$ is the
[cumulative distribution function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function)
of `μ`.
## Tags
integral
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory Set Filter Function
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal Interval NNReal
variable {ι 𝕜 E F A : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-!
### Integrability on an interval
-/
/-- A function `f` is called *interval integrable* with respect to a measure `μ` on an unordered
interval `a..b` if it is integrable on both intervals `(a, b]` and `(b, a]`. One of these
intervals is always empty, so this property is equivalent to `f` being integrable on
`(min a b, max a b]`. -/
def IntervalIntegrable (f : ℝ → E) (μ : Measure ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : Prop :=
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ IntegrableOn f (Ioc b a) μ
#align interval_integrable IntervalIntegrable
/-!
## Basic iff's for `IntervalIntegrable`
-/
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ}
/-- A function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` if and
only if it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. This is an equivalent
definition of `IntervalIntegrable`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ := by
rw [uIoc_eq_union, integrableOn_union, IntervalIntegrable]
#align interval_integrable_iff intervalIntegrable_iff
/-- If a function is interval integrable with respect to a given measure `μ` on `a..b` then
it is integrable on `uIoc a b` with respect to `μ`. -/
theorem IntervalIntegrable.def' (h : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b) : IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ :=
intervalIntegrable_iff.mp h
#align interval_integrable.def IntervalIntegrable.def'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le hab]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Ioc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff' [NoAtoms μ] :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (uIcc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, ← Icc_min_max, uIoc, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff' intervalIntegrable_iff'
theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b)
{μ : Measure ℝ} [NoAtoms μ] : IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
#align interval_integrable_iff_integrable_Icc_of_le intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 108 | 110 | theorem intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ico_of_le [NoAtoms μ] (hab : a ≤ b) :
IntervalIntegrable f μ a b ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ := by |
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le hab, integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johanes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
#align_import order.filter.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
/-- Product of filters. This is the filter generated by cartesian products
of elements of the component filters. -/
protected def prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter (α × β) :=
f.comap Prod.fst ⊓ g.comap Prod.snd
#align filter.prod Filter.prod
instance instSProd : SProd (Filter α) (Filter β) (Filter (α × β)) where
sprod := Filter.prod
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
#align filter.prod_mem_prod Filter.prod_mem_prod
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
#align filter.mem_prod_iff Filter.mem_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_mem_prod_iff Filter.prod_mem_prod_iff
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
#align filter.mem_prod_principal Filter.mem_prod_principal
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
#align filter.mem_prod_top Filter.mem_prod_top
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
#align filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff Filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
erw [comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_prod Filter.comap_prod
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
#align filter.prod_top Filter.prod_top
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_right, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.sup_prod Filter.sup_prod
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_left, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.prod_sup Filter.prod_sup
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
#align filter.eventually_prod_iff Filter.eventually_prod_iff
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_fst Filter.tendsto_fst
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_snd Filter.tendsto_snd
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prod_mk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prod_mk tendsto_fst
#align filter.tendsto_prod_swap Filter.tendsto_prod_swap
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl Filter.Eventually.prod_inl
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr Filter.Eventually.prod_inr
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk Filter.Eventually.prod_mk
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_map {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_map Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_map
theorem EventuallyLE.prod_map {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
#align filter.eventually_le.prod_map Filter.EventuallyLE.prod_map
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
#align filter.eventually.curry Filter.Eventually.curry
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_left Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_left
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_right Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_right
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
#align filter.tendsto_diag Filter.tendsto_diag
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_left Filter.prod_iInf_left
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_right Filter.prod_iInf_right
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
#align filter.prod_mono Filter.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
#align filter.prod_mono_left Filter.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
#align filter.prod_mono_right Filter.prod_mono_right
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, comap_inf, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.prod_comap_comap_eq Filter.prod_comap_comap_eq
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
#align filter.prod_comm' Filter.prod_comm'
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 272 | 274 | theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by |
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import computability.turing_machine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
/-!
# Turing machines
This file defines a sequence of simple machine languages, starting with Turing machines and working
up to more complex languages based on Wang B-machines.
## Naming conventions
Each model of computation in this file shares a naming convention for the elements of a model of
computation. These are the parameters for the language:
* `Γ` is the alphabet on the tape.
* `Λ` is the set of labels, or internal machine states.
* `σ` is the type of internal memory, not on the tape. This does not exist in the TM0 model, and
later models achieve this by mixing it into `Λ`.
* `K` is used in the TM2 model, which has multiple stacks, and denotes the number of such stacks.
All of these variables denote "essentially finite" types, but for technical reasons it is
convenient to allow them to be infinite anyway. When using an infinite type, we will be interested
to prove that only finitely many values of the type are ever interacted with.
Given these parameters, there are a few common structures for the model that arise:
* `Stmt` is the set of all actions that can be performed in one step. For the TM0 model this set is
finite, and for later models it is an infinite inductive type representing "possible program
texts".
* `Cfg` is the set of instantaneous configurations, that is, the state of the machine together with
its environment.
* `Machine` is the set of all machines in the model. Usually this is approximately a function
`Λ → Stmt`, although different models have different ways of halting and other actions.
* `step : Cfg → Option Cfg` is the function that describes how the state evolves over one step.
If `step c = none`, then `c` is a terminal state, and the result of the computation is read off
from `c`. Because of the type of `step`, these models are all deterministic by construction.
* `init : Input → Cfg` sets up the initial state. The type `Input` depends on the model;
in most cases it is `List Γ`.
* `eval : Machine → Input → Part Output`, given a machine `M` and input `i`, starts from
`init i`, runs `step` until it reaches an output, and then applies a function `Cfg → Output` to
the final state to obtain the result. The type `Output` depends on the model.
* `Supports : Machine → Finset Λ → Prop` asserts that a machine `M` starts in `S : Finset Λ`, and
can only ever jump to other states inside `S`. This implies that the behavior of `M` on any input
cannot depend on its values outside `S`. We use this to allow `Λ` to be an infinite set when
convenient, and prove that only finitely many of these states are actually accessible. This
formalizes "essentially finite" mentioned above.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Relation
open Nat (iterate)
open Function (update iterate_succ iterate_succ_apply iterate_succ' iterate_succ_apply'
iterate_zero_apply)
namespace Turing
/-- The `BlankExtends` partial order holds of `l₁` and `l₂` if `l₂` is obtained by adding
blanks (`default : Γ`) to the end of `l₁`. -/
def BlankExtends {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) : Prop :=
∃ n, l₂ = l₁ ++ List.replicate n default
#align turing.blank_extends Turing.BlankExtends
@[refl]
theorem BlankExtends.refl {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) : BlankExtends l l :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
#align turing.blank_extends.refl Turing.BlankExtends.refl
@[trans]
theorem BlankExtends.trans {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List Γ} :
BlankExtends l₁ l₂ → BlankExtends l₂ l₃ → BlankExtends l₁ l₃ := by
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i + j, by simp [List.replicate_add]⟩
#align turing.blank_extends.trans Turing.BlankExtends.trans
theorem BlankExtends.below_of_le {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : List Γ} :
BlankExtends l l₁ → BlankExtends l l₂ → l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → BlankExtends l₁ l₂ := by
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, rfl⟩ h; use j - i
simp only [List.length_append, Nat.add_le_add_iff_left, List.length_replicate] at h
simp only [← List.replicate_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel' h, List.append_assoc]
#align turing.blank_extends.below_of_le Turing.BlankExtends.below_of_le
/-- Any two extensions by blank `l₁,l₂` of `l` have a common join (which can be taken to be the
longer of `l₁` and `l₂`). -/
def BlankExtends.above {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : List Γ} (h₁ : BlankExtends l l₁)
(h₂ : BlankExtends l l₂) : { l' // BlankExtends l₁ l' ∧ BlankExtends l₂ l' } :=
if h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length then ⟨l₂, h₁.below_of_le h₂ h, BlankExtends.refl _⟩
else ⟨l₁, BlankExtends.refl _, h₂.below_of_le h₁ (le_of_not_ge h)⟩
#align turing.blank_extends.above Turing.BlankExtends.above
theorem BlankExtends.above_of_le {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : List Γ} :
BlankExtends l₁ l → BlankExtends l₂ l → l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → BlankExtends l₁ l₂ := by
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, e⟩ h; use i - j
refine List.append_cancel_right (e.symm.trans ?_)
rw [List.append_assoc, ← List.replicate_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
apply_fun List.length at e
simp only [List.length_append, List.length_replicate] at e
rwa [← Nat.add_le_add_iff_left, e, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
#align turing.blank_extends.above_of_le Turing.BlankExtends.above_of_le
/-- `BlankRel` is the symmetric closure of `BlankExtends`, turning it into an equivalence
relation. Two lists are related by `BlankRel` if one extends the other by blanks. -/
def BlankRel {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) : Prop :=
BlankExtends l₁ l₂ ∨ BlankExtends l₂ l₁
#align turing.blank_rel Turing.BlankRel
@[refl]
theorem BlankRel.refl {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) : BlankRel l l :=
Or.inl (BlankExtends.refl _)
#align turing.blank_rel.refl Turing.BlankRel.refl
@[symm]
theorem BlankRel.symm {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : List Γ} : BlankRel l₁ l₂ → BlankRel l₂ l₁ :=
Or.symm
#align turing.blank_rel.symm Turing.BlankRel.symm
@[trans]
theorem BlankRel.trans {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List Γ} :
BlankRel l₁ l₂ → BlankRel l₂ l₃ → BlankRel l₁ l₃ := by
rintro (h₁ | h₁) (h₂ | h₂)
· exact Or.inl (h₁.trans h₂)
· rcases le_total l₁.length l₃.length with h | h
· exact Or.inl (h₁.above_of_le h₂ h)
· exact Or.inr (h₂.above_of_le h₁ h)
· rcases le_total l₁.length l₃.length with h | h
· exact Or.inl (h₁.below_of_le h₂ h)
· exact Or.inr (h₂.below_of_le h₁ h)
· exact Or.inr (h₂.trans h₁)
#align turing.blank_rel.trans Turing.BlankRel.trans
/-- Given two `BlankRel` lists, there exists (constructively) a common join. -/
def BlankRel.above {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : List Γ} (h : BlankRel l₁ l₂) :
{ l // BlankExtends l₁ l ∧ BlankExtends l₂ l } := by
refine
if hl : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length then ⟨l₂, Or.elim h id fun h' ↦ ?_, BlankExtends.refl _⟩
else ⟨l₁, BlankExtends.refl _, Or.elim h (fun h' ↦ ?_) id⟩
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' hl
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' (le_of_not_ge hl)
#align turing.blank_rel.above Turing.BlankRel.above
/-- Given two `BlankRel` lists, there exists (constructively) a common meet. -/
def BlankRel.below {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : List Γ} (h : BlankRel l₁ l₂) :
{ l // BlankExtends l l₁ ∧ BlankExtends l l₂ } := by
refine
if hl : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length then ⟨l₁, BlankExtends.refl _, Or.elim h id fun h' ↦ ?_⟩
else ⟨l₂, Or.elim h (fun h' ↦ ?_) id, BlankExtends.refl _⟩
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' hl
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' (le_of_not_ge hl)
#align turing.blank_rel.below Turing.BlankRel.below
theorem BlankRel.equivalence (Γ) [Inhabited Γ] : Equivalence (@BlankRel Γ _) :=
⟨BlankRel.refl, @BlankRel.symm _ _, @BlankRel.trans _ _⟩
#align turing.blank_rel.equivalence Turing.BlankRel.equivalence
/-- Construct a setoid instance for `BlankRel`. -/
def BlankRel.setoid (Γ) [Inhabited Γ] : Setoid (List Γ) :=
⟨_, BlankRel.equivalence _⟩
#align turing.blank_rel.setoid Turing.BlankRel.setoid
/-- A `ListBlank Γ` is a quotient of `List Γ` by extension by blanks at the end. This is used to
represent half-tapes of a Turing machine, so that we can pretend that the list continues
infinitely with blanks. -/
def ListBlank (Γ) [Inhabited Γ] :=
Quotient (BlankRel.setoid Γ)
#align turing.list_blank Turing.ListBlank
instance ListBlank.inhabited {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : Inhabited (ListBlank Γ) :=
⟨Quotient.mk'' []⟩
#align turing.list_blank.inhabited Turing.ListBlank.inhabited
instance ListBlank.hasEmptyc {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : EmptyCollection (ListBlank Γ) :=
⟨Quotient.mk'' []⟩
#align turing.list_blank.has_emptyc Turing.ListBlank.hasEmptyc
/-- A modified version of `Quotient.liftOn'` specialized for `ListBlank`, with the stronger
precondition `BlankExtends` instead of `BlankRel`. -/
-- Porting note: Removed `@[elab_as_elim]`
protected abbrev ListBlank.liftOn {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {α} (l : ListBlank Γ) (f : List Γ → α)
(H : ∀ a b, BlankExtends a b → f a = f b) : α :=
l.liftOn' f <| by rintro a b (h | h) <;> [exact H _ _ h; exact (H _ _ h).symm]
#align turing.list_blank.lift_on Turing.ListBlank.liftOn
/-- The quotient map turning a `List` into a `ListBlank`. -/
def ListBlank.mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : List Γ → ListBlank Γ :=
Quotient.mk''
#align turing.list_blank.mk Turing.ListBlank.mk
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ListBlank.induction_on {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {p : ListBlank Γ → Prop}
(q : ListBlank Γ) (h : ∀ a, p (ListBlank.mk a)) : p q :=
Quotient.inductionOn' q h
#align turing.list_blank.induction_on Turing.ListBlank.induction_on
/-- The head of a `ListBlank` is well defined. -/
def ListBlank.head {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) : Γ := by
apply l.liftOn List.headI
rintro a _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
cases a
· cases i <;> rfl
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head Turing.ListBlank.head
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.head_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) :
ListBlank.head (ListBlank.mk l) = l.headI :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head_mk Turing.ListBlank.head_mk
/-- The tail of a `ListBlank` is well defined (up to the tail of blanks). -/
def ListBlank.tail {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) : ListBlank Γ := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk l.tail)
rintro a _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ?_)
cases a
· cases' i with i <;> [exact ⟨0, rfl⟩; exact ⟨i, rfl⟩]
exact ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align turing.list_blank.tail Turing.ListBlank.tail
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.tail_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) :
ListBlank.tail (ListBlank.mk l) = ListBlank.mk l.tail :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.tail_mk Turing.ListBlank.tail_mk
/-- We can cons an element onto a `ListBlank`. -/
def ListBlank.cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) (l : ListBlank Γ) : ListBlank Γ := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk (List.cons a l))
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨i, rfl⟩)
#align turing.list_blank.cons Turing.ListBlank.cons
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.cons_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) (l : List Γ) :
ListBlank.cons a (ListBlank.mk l) = ListBlank.mk (a :: l) :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.cons_mk Turing.ListBlank.cons_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.head_cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) : ∀ l : ListBlank Γ, (l.cons a).head = a :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head_cons Turing.ListBlank.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.tail_cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) : ∀ l : ListBlank Γ, (l.cons a).tail = l :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.tail_cons Turing.ListBlank.tail_cons
/-- The `cons` and `head`/`tail` functions are mutually inverse, unlike in the case of `List` where
this only holds for nonempty lists. -/
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.cons_head_tail {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : ∀ l : ListBlank Γ, l.tail.cons l.head = l := by
apply Quotient.ind'
refine fun l ↦ Quotient.sound' (Or.inr ?_)
cases l
· exact ⟨1, rfl⟩
· rfl
#align turing.list_blank.cons_head_tail Turing.ListBlank.cons_head_tail
/-- The `cons` and `head`/`tail` functions are mutually inverse, unlike in the case of `List` where
this only holds for nonempty lists. -/
theorem ListBlank.exists_cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) :
∃ a l', l = ListBlank.cons a l' :=
⟨_, _, (ListBlank.cons_head_tail _).symm⟩
#align turing.list_blank.exists_cons Turing.ListBlank.exists_cons
/-- The n-th element of a `ListBlank` is well defined for all `n : ℕ`, unlike in a `List`. -/
def ListBlank.nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) : Γ := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ List.getI l n)
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
cases' lt_or_le n _ with h h
· rw [List.getI_append _ _ _ h]
rw [List.getI_eq_default _ h]
rcases le_or_lt _ n with h₂ | h₂
· rw [List.getI_eq_default _ h₂]
rw [List.getI_eq_get _ h₂, List.get_append_right' h, List.get_replicate]
#align turing.list_blank.nth Turing.ListBlank.nth
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) (n : ℕ) :
(ListBlank.mk l).nth n = l.getI n :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_mk Turing.ListBlank.nth_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_zero {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) : l.nth 0 = l.head := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l.tail fun l ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_zero Turing.ListBlank.nth_zero
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_succ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
l.nth (n + 1) = l.tail.nth n := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l.tail fun l ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_succ Turing.ListBlank.nth_succ
@[ext]
theorem ListBlank.ext {Γ} [i : Inhabited Γ] {L₁ L₂ : ListBlank Γ} :
(∀ i, L₁.nth i = L₂.nth i) → L₁ = L₂ := by
refine ListBlank.induction_on L₁ fun l₁ ↦ ListBlank.induction_on L₂ fun l₂ H ↦ ?_
wlog h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length
· cases le_total l₁.length l₂.length <;> [skip; symm] <;> apply this <;> try assumption
intro
rw [H]
refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨l₂.length - l₁.length, ?_⟩)
refine List.ext_get ?_ fun i h h₂ ↦ Eq.symm ?_
· simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel' h, List.length_append, List.length_replicate]
simp only [ListBlank.nth_mk] at H
cases' lt_or_le i l₁.length with h' h'
· simp only [List.get_append _ h', List.get?_eq_get h, List.get?_eq_get h',
← List.getI_eq_get _ h, ← List.getI_eq_get _ h', H]
· simp only [List.get_append_right' h', List.get_replicate, List.get?_eq_get h,
List.get?_len_le h', ← List.getI_eq_default _ h', H, List.getI_eq_get _ h]
#align turing.list_blank.ext Turing.ListBlank.ext
/-- Apply a function to a value stored at the nth position of the list. -/
@[simp]
def ListBlank.modifyNth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) : ℕ → ListBlank Γ → ListBlank Γ
| 0, L => L.tail.cons (f L.head)
| n + 1, L => (L.tail.modifyNth f n).cons L.head
#align turing.list_blank.modify_nth Turing.ListBlank.modifyNth
theorem ListBlank.nth_modifyNth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) (n i) (L : ListBlank Γ) :
(L.modifyNth f n).nth i = if i = n then f (L.nth i) else L.nth i := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing i L
· cases i <;> simp only [ListBlank.nth_zero, if_true, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth,
ListBlank.nth_succ, if_false, ListBlank.tail_cons, Nat.zero_eq]
· cases i
· rw [if_neg (Nat.succ_ne_zero _).symm]
simp only [ListBlank.nth_zero, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth, Nat.zero_eq]
· simp only [IH, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.tail_cons, Nat.succ.injEq]
#align turing.list_blank.nth_modify_nth Turing.ListBlank.nth_modifyNth
/-- A pointed map of `Inhabited` types is a map that sends one default value to the other. -/
structure PointedMap.{u, v} (Γ : Type u) (Γ' : Type v) [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] :
Type max u v where
/-- The map underlying this instance. -/
f : Γ → Γ'
map_pt' : f default = default
#align turing.pointed_map Turing.PointedMap
instance {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] : Inhabited (PointedMap Γ Γ') :=
⟨⟨default, rfl⟩⟩
instance {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] : CoeFun (PointedMap Γ Γ') fun _ ↦ Γ → Γ' :=
⟨PointedMap.f⟩
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem PointedMap.mk_val {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : Γ → Γ') (pt) :
(PointedMap.mk f pt : Γ → Γ') = f :=
rfl
#align turing.pointed_map.mk_val Turing.PointedMap.mk_val
@[simp]
theorem PointedMap.map_pt {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') :
f default = default :=
PointedMap.map_pt' _
#align turing.pointed_map.map_pt Turing.PointedMap.map_pt
@[simp]
theorem PointedMap.headI_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : List Γ) : (l.map f).headI = f l.headI := by
cases l <;> [exact (PointedMap.map_pt f).symm; rfl]
#align turing.pointed_map.head_map Turing.PointedMap.headI_map
/-- The `map` function on lists is well defined on `ListBlank`s provided that the map is
pointed. -/
def ListBlank.map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (l : ListBlank Γ) :
ListBlank Γ' := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk (List.map f l))
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨i, ?_⟩)
simp only [PointedMap.map_pt, List.map_append, List.map_replicate]
#align turing.list_blank.map Turing.ListBlank.map
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.map_mk {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (l : List Γ) :
(ListBlank.mk l).map f = ListBlank.mk (l.map f) :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.map_mk Turing.ListBlank.map_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.head_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) : (l.map f).head = f l.head := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l fun a ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head_map Turing.ListBlank.head_map
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.tail_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) : (l.map f).tail = l.tail.map f := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l fun a ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.tail_map Turing.ListBlank.tail_map
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.map_cons {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) (a : Γ) : (l.cons a).map f = (l.map f).cons (f a) := by
refine (ListBlank.cons_head_tail _).symm.trans ?_
simp only [ListBlank.head_map, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_map, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.list_blank.map_cons Turing.ListBlank.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) : (l.map f).nth n = f (l.nth n) := by
refine l.inductionOn fun l ↦ ?_
-- Porting note: Added `suffices` to get `simp` to work.
suffices ((mk l).map f).nth n = f ((mk l).nth n) by exact this
simp only [List.get?_map, ListBlank.map_mk, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_get?]
cases l.get? n
· exact f.2.symm
· rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_map Turing.ListBlank.nth_map
/-- The `i`-th projection as a pointed map. -/
def proj {ι : Type*} {Γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Inhabited (Γ i)] (i : ι) :
PointedMap (∀ i, Γ i) (Γ i) :=
⟨fun a ↦ a i, rfl⟩
#align turing.proj Turing.proj
theorem proj_map_nth {ι : Type*} {Γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Inhabited (Γ i)] (i : ι) (L n) :
(ListBlank.map (@proj ι Γ _ i) L).nth n = L.nth n i := by
rw [ListBlank.nth_map]; rfl
#align turing.proj_map_nth Turing.proj_map_nth
theorem ListBlank.map_modifyNth {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (F : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(f : Γ → Γ) (f' : Γ' → Γ') (H : ∀ x, F (f x) = f' (F x)) (n) (L : ListBlank Γ) :
(L.modifyNth f n).map F = (L.map F).modifyNth f' n := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing L <;>
simp only [*, ListBlank.head_map, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.map_cons, ListBlank.tail_map]
#align turing.list_blank.map_modify_nth Turing.ListBlank.map_modifyNth
/-- Append a list on the left side of a `ListBlank`. -/
@[simp]
def ListBlank.append {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : List Γ → ListBlank Γ → ListBlank Γ
| [], L => L
| a :: l, L => ListBlank.cons a (ListBlank.append l L)
#align turing.list_blank.append Turing.ListBlank.append
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.append_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) :
ListBlank.append l₁ (ListBlank.mk l₂) = ListBlank.mk (l₁ ++ l₂) := by
induction l₁ <;>
simp only [*, ListBlank.append, List.nil_append, List.cons_append, ListBlank.cons_mk]
#align turing.list_blank.append_mk Turing.ListBlank.append_mk
theorem ListBlank.append_assoc {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) (l₃ : ListBlank Γ) :
ListBlank.append (l₁ ++ l₂) l₃ = ListBlank.append l₁ (ListBlank.append l₂ l₃) := by
refine l₃.inductionOn fun l ↦ ?_
-- Porting note: Added `suffices` to get `simp` to work.
suffices append (l₁ ++ l₂) (mk l) = append l₁ (append l₂ (mk l)) by exact this
simp only [ListBlank.append_mk, List.append_assoc]
#align turing.list_blank.append_assoc Turing.ListBlank.append_assoc
/-- The `bind` function on lists is well defined on `ListBlank`s provided that the default element
is sent to a sequence of default elements. -/
def ListBlank.bind {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (l : ListBlank Γ) (f : Γ → List Γ')
(hf : ∃ n, f default = List.replicate n default) : ListBlank Γ' := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk (List.bind l f))
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; cases' hf with n e; refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨i * n, ?_⟩)
rw [List.append_bind, mul_comm]; congr
induction' i with i IH
· rfl
simp only [IH, e, List.replicate_add, Nat.mul_succ, add_comm, List.replicate_succ, List.cons_bind]
#align turing.list_blank.bind Turing.ListBlank.bind
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.bind_mk {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (l : List Γ) (f : Γ → List Γ') (hf) :
(ListBlank.mk l).bind f hf = ListBlank.mk (l.bind f) :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.bind_mk Turing.ListBlank.bind_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.cons_bind {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (a : Γ) (l : ListBlank Γ)
(f : Γ → List Γ') (hf) : (l.cons a).bind f hf = (l.bind f hf).append (f a) := by
refine l.inductionOn fun l ↦ ?_
-- Porting note: Added `suffices` to get `simp` to work.
suffices ((mk l).cons a).bind f hf = ((mk l).bind f hf).append (f a) by exact this
simp only [ListBlank.append_mk, ListBlank.bind_mk, ListBlank.cons_mk, List.cons_bind]
#align turing.list_blank.cons_bind Turing.ListBlank.cons_bind
/-- The tape of a Turing machine is composed of a head element (which we imagine to be the
current position of the head), together with two `ListBlank`s denoting the portions of the tape
going off to the left and right. When the Turing machine moves right, an element is pulled from the
right side and becomes the new head, while the head element is `cons`ed onto the left side. -/
structure Tape (Γ : Type*) [Inhabited Γ] where
/-- The current position of the head. -/
head : Γ
/-- The portion of the tape going off to the left. -/
left : ListBlank Γ
/-- The portion of the tape going off to the right. -/
right : ListBlank Γ
#align turing.tape Turing.Tape
instance Tape.inhabited {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : Inhabited (Tape Γ) :=
⟨by constructor <;> apply default⟩
#align turing.tape.inhabited Turing.Tape.inhabited
/-- A direction for the Turing machine `move` command, either
left or right. -/
inductive Dir
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align turing.dir Turing.Dir
/-- The "inclusive" left side of the tape, including both `left` and `head`. -/
def Tape.left₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ListBlank Γ :=
T.left.cons T.head
#align turing.tape.left₀ Turing.Tape.left₀
/-- The "inclusive" right side of the tape, including both `right` and `head`. -/
def Tape.right₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ListBlank Γ :=
T.right.cons T.head
#align turing.tape.right₀ Turing.Tape.right₀
/-- Move the tape in response to a motion of the Turing machine. Note that `T.move Dir.left` makes
`T.left` smaller; the Turing machine is moving left and the tape is moving right. -/
def Tape.move {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : Dir → Tape Γ → Tape Γ
| Dir.left, ⟨a, L, R⟩ => ⟨L.head, L.tail, R.cons a⟩
| Dir.right, ⟨a, L, R⟩ => ⟨R.head, L.cons a, R.tail⟩
#align turing.tape.move Turing.Tape.move
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_left_right {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) :
(T.move Dir.left).move Dir.right = T := by
cases T; simp [Tape.move]
#align turing.tape.move_left_right Turing.Tape.move_left_right
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_left {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) :
(T.move Dir.right).move Dir.left = T := by
cases T; simp [Tape.move]
#align turing.tape.move_right_left Turing.Tape.move_right_left
/-- Construct a tape from a left side and an inclusive right side. -/
def Tape.mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : Tape Γ :=
⟨R.head, L, R.tail⟩
#align turing.tape.mk' Turing.Tape.mk'
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_left {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).left = L :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.mk'_left Turing.Tape.mk'_left
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_head {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).head = R.head :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.mk'_head Turing.Tape.mk'_head
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_right {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).right = R.tail :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.mk'_right Turing.Tape.mk'_right
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_right₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).right₀ = R :=
ListBlank.cons_head_tail _
#align turing.tape.mk'_right₀ Turing.Tape.mk'_right₀
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_left_right₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : Tape.mk' T.left T.right₀ = T := by
cases T
simp only [Tape.right₀, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_cons, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self_iff]
#align turing.tape.mk'_left_right₀ Turing.Tape.mk'_left_right₀
theorem Tape.exists_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ∃ L R, T = Tape.mk' L R :=
⟨_, _, (Tape.mk'_left_right₀ _).symm⟩
#align turing.tape.exists_mk' Turing.Tape.exists_mk'
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_left_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).move Dir.left = Tape.mk' L.tail (R.cons L.head) := by
simp only [Tape.move, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, eq_self_iff_true, ListBlank.cons_head_tail,
and_self_iff, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.tape.move_left_mk' Turing.Tape.move_left_mk'
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).move Dir.right = Tape.mk' (L.cons R.head) R.tail := by
simp only [Tape.move, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, eq_self_iff_true, ListBlank.cons_head_tail,
and_self_iff, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.tape.move_right_mk' Turing.Tape.move_right_mk'
/-- Construct a tape from a left side and an inclusive right side. -/
def Tape.mk₂ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : List Γ) : Tape Γ :=
Tape.mk' (ListBlank.mk L) (ListBlank.mk R)
#align turing.tape.mk₂ Turing.Tape.mk₂
/-- Construct a tape from a list, with the head of the list at the TM head and the rest going
to the right. -/
def Tape.mk₁ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) : Tape Γ :=
Tape.mk₂ [] l
#align turing.tape.mk₁ Turing.Tape.mk₁
/-- The `nth` function of a tape is integer-valued, with index `0` being the head, negative indexes
on the left and positive indexes on the right. (Picture a number line.) -/
def Tape.nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ℤ → Γ
| 0 => T.head
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => T.right.nth n
| -(n + 1 : ℕ) => T.left.nth n
#align turing.tape.nth Turing.Tape.nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.nth_zero {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : T.nth 0 = T.1 :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.nth_zero Turing.Tape.nth_zero
theorem Tape.right₀_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) (n : ℕ) : T.right₀.nth n = T.nth n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Tape.nth, Tape.right₀, Int.ofNat_zero, ListBlank.nth_zero,
ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_cons, Nat.zero_eq]
#align turing.tape.right₀_nth Turing.Tape.right₀_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_nth_nat {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).nth n = R.nth n := by
rw [← Tape.right₀_nth, Tape.mk'_right₀]
#align turing.tape.mk'_nth_nat Turing.Tape.mk'_nth_nat
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_left_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] :
∀ (T : Tape Γ) (i : ℤ), (T.move Dir.left).nth i = T.nth (i - 1)
| ⟨_, L, _⟩, -(n + 1 : ℕ) => (ListBlank.nth_succ _ _).symm
| ⟨_, L, _⟩, 0 => (ListBlank.nth_zero _).symm
| ⟨a, L, R⟩, 1 => (ListBlank.nth_zero _).trans (ListBlank.head_cons _ _)
| ⟨a, L, R⟩, (n + 1 : ℕ) + 1 => by
rw [add_sub_cancel_right]
change (R.cons a).nth (n + 1) = R.nth n
rw [ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.tape.move_left_nth Turing.Tape.move_left_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) (i : ℤ) :
(T.move Dir.right).nth i = T.nth (i + 1) := by
conv => rhs; rw [← T.move_right_left]
rw [Tape.move_left_nth, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align turing.tape.move_right_nth Turing.Tape.move_right_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_n_head {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) (i : ℕ) :
((Tape.move Dir.right)^[i] T).head = T.nth i := by
induction i generalizing T
· rfl
· simp only [*, Tape.move_right_nth, Int.ofNat_succ, iterate_succ, Function.comp_apply]
#align turing.tape.move_right_n_head Turing.Tape.move_right_n_head
/-- Replace the current value of the head on the tape. -/
def Tape.write {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (b : Γ) (T : Tape Γ) : Tape Γ :=
{ T with head := b }
#align turing.tape.write Turing.Tape.write
@[simp]
theorem Tape.write_self {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : ∀ T : Tape Γ, T.write T.1 = T := by
rintro ⟨⟩; rfl
#align turing.tape.write_self Turing.Tape.write_self
@[simp]
theorem Tape.write_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (b : Γ) :
∀ (T : Tape Γ) {i : ℤ}, (T.write b).nth i = if i = 0 then b else T.nth i
| _, 0 => rfl
| _, (_ + 1 : ℕ) => rfl
| _, -(_ + 1 : ℕ) => rfl
#align turing.tape.write_nth Turing.Tape.write_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.write_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a b : Γ) (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L (R.cons a)).write b = Tape.mk' L (R.cons b) := by
simp only [Tape.write, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_cons, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self_iff]
#align turing.tape.write_mk' Turing.Tape.write_mk'
/-- Apply a pointed map to a tape to change the alphabet. -/
def Tape.map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (T : Tape Γ) : Tape Γ' :=
⟨f T.1, T.2.map f, T.3.map f⟩
#align turing.tape.map Turing.Tape.map
@[simp]
theorem Tape.map_fst {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') :
∀ T : Tape Γ, (T.map f).1 = f T.1 := by
rintro ⟨⟩; rfl
#align turing.tape.map_fst Turing.Tape.map_fst
@[simp]
theorem Tape.map_write {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (b : Γ) :
∀ T : Tape Γ, (T.write b).map f = (T.map f).write (f b) := by
rintro ⟨⟩; rfl
#align turing.tape.map_write Turing.Tape.map_write
-- Porting note: `simpNF` complains about LHS does not simplify when using the simp lemma on
-- itself, but it does indeed.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Tape.write_move_right_n {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) (L R : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
((Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' L R)).write (f (R.nth n)) =
(Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' L (R.modifyNth f n)) := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing L R
· simp only [ListBlank.nth_zero, ListBlank.modifyNth, iterate_zero_apply, Nat.zero_eq]
rw [← Tape.write_mk', ListBlank.cons_head_tail]
simp only [ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.modifyNth, Tape.move_right_mk',
ListBlank.tail_cons, iterate_succ_apply, IH]
#align turing.tape.write_move_right_n Turing.Tape.write_move_right_n
theorem Tape.map_move {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (T : Tape Γ) (d) :
(T.move d).map f = (T.map f).move d := by
cases T
cases d <;> simp only [Tape.move, Tape.map, ListBlank.head_map, eq_self_iff_true,
ListBlank.map_cons, and_self_iff, ListBlank.tail_map]
#align turing.tape.map_move Turing.Tape.map_move
theorem Tape.map_mk' {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).map f = Tape.mk' (L.map f) (R.map f) := by
simp only [Tape.mk', Tape.map, ListBlank.head_map, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff,
ListBlank.tail_map]
#align turing.tape.map_mk' Turing.Tape.map_mk'
theorem Tape.map_mk₂ {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (L R : List Γ) :
(Tape.mk₂ L R).map f = Tape.mk₂ (L.map f) (R.map f) := by
simp only [Tape.mk₂, Tape.map_mk', ListBlank.map_mk]
#align turing.tape.map_mk₂ Turing.Tape.map_mk₂
theorem Tape.map_mk₁ {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (l : List Γ) :
(Tape.mk₁ l).map f = Tape.mk₁ (l.map f) :=
Tape.map_mk₂ _ _ _
#align turing.tape.map_mk₁ Turing.Tape.map_mk₁
/-- Run a state transition function `σ → Option σ` "to completion". The return value is the last
state returned before a `none` result. If the state transition function always returns `some`,
then the computation diverges, returning `Part.none`. -/
def eval {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) : σ → Part σ :=
PFun.fix fun s ↦ Part.some <| (f s).elim (Sum.inl s) Sum.inr
#align turing.eval Turing.eval
/-- The reflexive transitive closure of a state transition function. `Reaches f a b` means
there is a finite sequence of steps `f a = some a₁`, `f a₁ = some a₂`, ... such that `aₙ = b`.
This relation permits zero steps of the state transition function. -/
def Reaches {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) : σ → σ → Prop :=
ReflTransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ f a
#align turing.reaches Turing.Reaches
/-- The transitive closure of a state transition function. `Reaches₁ f a b` means there is a
nonempty finite sequence of steps `f a = some a₁`, `f a₁ = some a₂`, ... such that `aₙ = b`.
This relation does not permit zero steps of the state transition function. -/
def Reaches₁ {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) : σ → σ → Prop :=
TransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ f a
#align turing.reaches₁ Turing.Reaches₁
theorem reaches₁_eq {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c} (h : f a = f b) :
Reaches₁ f a c ↔ Reaches₁ f b c :=
TransGen.head'_iff.trans (TransGen.head'_iff.trans <| by rw [h]).symm
#align turing.reaches₁_eq Turing.reaches₁_eq
theorem reaches_total {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c} (hab : Reaches f a b) (hac : Reaches f a c) :
Reaches f b c ∨ Reaches f c b :=
ReflTransGen.total_of_right_unique (fun _ _ _ ↦ Option.mem_unique) hab hac
#align turing.reaches_total Turing.reaches_total
theorem reaches₁_fwd {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c} (h₁ : Reaches₁ f a c) (h₂ : b ∈ f a) :
Reaches f b c := by
rcases TransGen.head'_iff.1 h₁ with ⟨b', hab, hbc⟩
cases Option.mem_unique hab h₂; exact hbc
#align turing.reaches₁_fwd Turing.reaches₁_fwd
/-- A variation on `Reaches`. `Reaches₀ f a b` holds if whenever `Reaches₁ f b c` then
`Reaches₁ f a c`. This is a weaker property than `Reaches` and is useful for replacing states with
equivalent states without taking a step. -/
def Reaches₀ {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) (a b : σ) : Prop :=
∀ c, Reaches₁ f b c → Reaches₁ f a c
#align turing.reaches₀ Turing.Reaches₀
theorem Reaches₀.trans {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h₁ : Reaches₀ f a b)
(h₂ : Reaches₀ f b c) : Reaches₀ f a c
| _, h₃ => h₁ _ (h₂ _ h₃)
#align turing.reaches₀.trans Turing.Reaches₀.trans
@[refl]
theorem Reaches₀.refl {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} (a : σ) : Reaches₀ f a a
| _, h => h
#align turing.reaches₀.refl Turing.Reaches₀.refl
theorem Reaches₀.single {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b : σ} (h : b ∈ f a) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h₂ => h₂.head h
#align turing.reaches₀.single Turing.Reaches₀.single
theorem Reaches₀.head {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h : b ∈ f a) (h₂ : Reaches₀ f b c) :
Reaches₀ f a c :=
(Reaches₀.single h).trans h₂
#align turing.reaches₀.head Turing.Reaches₀.head
theorem Reaches₀.tail {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h₁ : Reaches₀ f a b) (h : c ∈ f b) :
Reaches₀ f a c :=
h₁.trans (Reaches₀.single h)
#align turing.reaches₀.tail Turing.Reaches₀.tail
theorem reaches₀_eq {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (e : f a = f b) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h => (reaches₁_eq e).2 h
#align turing.reaches₀_eq Turing.reaches₀_eq
theorem Reaches₁.to₀ {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b : σ} (h : Reaches₁ f a b) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h₂ => h.trans h₂
#align turing.reaches₁.to₀ Turing.Reaches₁.to₀
theorem Reaches.to₀ {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b : σ} (h : Reaches f a b) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h₂ => h₂.trans_right h
#align turing.reaches.to₀ Turing.Reaches.to₀
theorem Reaches₀.tail' {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h : Reaches₀ f a b) (h₂ : c ∈ f b) :
Reaches₁ f a c :=
h _ (TransGen.single h₂)
#align turing.reaches₀.tail' Turing.Reaches₀.tail'
/-- (co-)Induction principle for `eval`. If a property `C` holds of any point `a` evaluating to `b`
which is either terminal (meaning `a = b`) or where the next point also satisfies `C`, then it
holds of any point where `eval f a` evaluates to `b`. This formalizes the notion that if
`eval f a` evaluates to `b` then it reaches terminal state `b` in finitely many steps. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def evalInduction {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {b : σ} {C : σ → Sort*} {a : σ}
(h : b ∈ eval f a) (H : ∀ a, b ∈ eval f a → (∀ a', f a = some a' → C a') → C a) : C a :=
PFun.fixInduction h fun a' ha' h' ↦
H _ ha' fun b' e ↦ h' _ <| Part.mem_some_iff.2 <| by rw [e]; rfl
#align turing.eval_induction Turing.evalInduction
theorem mem_eval {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} : b ∈ eval f a ↔ Reaches f a b ∧ f b = none := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: Explicitly specify `c`.
refine @evalInduction _ _ _ (fun a ↦ Reaches f a b ∧ f b = none) _ h fun a h IH ↦ ?_
cases' e : f a with a'
· rw [Part.mem_unique h
(PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 <| Or.inl <| Part.mem_some_iff.2 <| by rw [e] <;> rfl)]
exact ⟨ReflTransGen.refl, e⟩
· rcases PFun.mem_fix_iff.1 h with (h | ⟨_, h, _⟩) <;> rw [e] at h <;>
cases Part.mem_some_iff.1 h
cases' IH a' e with h₁ h₂
exact ⟨ReflTransGen.head e h₁, h₂⟩
· refine ReflTransGen.head_induction_on h₁ ?_ fun h _ IH ↦ ?_
· refine PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inl ?_)
rw [h₂]
apply Part.mem_some
· refine PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, ?_, IH⟩)
rw [h]
apply Part.mem_some
#align turing.mem_eval Turing.mem_eval
theorem eval_maximal₁ {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (h : b ∈ eval f a) (c) : ¬Reaches₁ f b c
| bc => by
let ⟨_, b0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
let ⟨b', h', _⟩ := TransGen.head'_iff.1 bc
cases b0.symm.trans h'
#align turing.eval_maximal₁ Turing.eval_maximal₁
theorem eval_maximal {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (h : b ∈ eval f a) {c} : Reaches f b c ↔ c = b :=
let ⟨_, b0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun b' h' ↦ by cases b0.symm.trans h'
#align turing.eval_maximal Turing.eval_maximal
theorem reaches_eval {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (ab : Reaches f a b) : eval f a = eval f b := by
refine Part.ext fun _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· have ⟨ac, c0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
exact mem_eval.2 ⟨(or_iff_left_of_imp fun cb ↦ (eval_maximal h).1 cb ▸ ReflTransGen.refl).1
(reaches_total ab ac), c0⟩
· have ⟨bc, c0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
exact mem_eval.2 ⟨ab.trans bc, c0⟩
#align turing.reaches_eval Turing.reaches_eval
/-- Given a relation `tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop` between state spaces, and state transition functions
`f₁ : σ₁ → Option σ₁` and `f₂ : σ₂ → Option σ₂`, `Respects f₁ f₂ tr` means that if `tr a₁ a₂` holds
initially and `f₁` takes a step to `a₂` then `f₂` will take one or more steps before reaching a
state `b₂` satisfying `tr a₂ b₂`, and if `f₁ a₁` terminates then `f₂ a₂` also terminates.
Such a relation `tr` is also known as a refinement. -/
def Respects {σ₁ σ₂} (f₁ : σ₁ → Option σ₁) (f₂ : σ₂ → Option σ₂) (tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂⦄, tr a₁ a₂ → (match f₁ a₁ with
| some b₁ => ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ Reaches₁ f₂ a₂ b₂
| none => f₂ a₂ = none : Prop)
#align turing.respects Turing.Respects
theorem tr_reaches₁ {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop} (H : Respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂}
(aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₁} (ab : Reaches₁ f₁ a₁ b₁) : ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ Reaches₁ f₂ a₂ b₂ := by
induction' ab with c₁ ac c₁ d₁ _ cd IH
· have := H aa
rwa [show f₁ a₁ = _ from ac] at this
· rcases IH with ⟨c₂, cc, ac₂⟩
have := H cc
rw [show f₁ c₁ = _ from cd] at this
rcases this with ⟨d₂, dd, cd₂⟩
exact ⟨_, dd, ac₂.trans cd₂⟩
#align turing.tr_reaches₁ Turing.tr_reaches₁
| Mathlib/Computability/TuringMachine.lean | 901 | 906 | theorem tr_reaches {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop} (H : Respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂}
(aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₁} (ab : Reaches f₁ a₁ b₁) : ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ Reaches f₂ a₂ b₂ := by |
rcases reflTransGen_iff_eq_or_transGen.1 ab with (rfl | ab)
· exact ⟨_, aa, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
· have ⟨b₂, bb, h⟩ := tr_reaches₁ H aa ab
exact ⟨b₂, bb, h.to_reflTransGen⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
#align_import ring_theory.rees_algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Rees algebra
The Rees algebra of an ideal `I` is the subalgebra `R[It]` of `R[t]` defined as `R[It] = ⨁ₙ Iⁿ tⁿ`.
This is used to prove the Artin-Rees lemma, and will potentially enable us to calculate some
blowup in the future.
## Main definition
- `reesAlgebra` : The Rees algebra of an ideal `I`, defined as a subalgebra of `R[X]`.
- `adjoin_monomial_eq_reesAlgebra` : The Rees algebra is generated by the degree one elements.
- `reesAlgebra.fg` : The Rees algebra of a f.g. ideal is of finite type. In particular, this
implies that the rees algebra over a noetherian ring is still noetherian.
-/
universe u v
variable {R M : Type u} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
/-- The Rees algebra of an ideal `I`, defined as the subalgebra of `R[X]` whose `i`-th coefficient
falls in `I ^ i`. -/
def reesAlgebra : Subalgebra R R[X] where
carrier := { f | ∀ i, f.coeff i ∈ I ^ i }
mul_mem' hf hg i := by
rw [coeff_mul]
apply Ideal.sum_mem
rintro ⟨j, k⟩ e
rw [← Finset.mem_antidiagonal.mp e, pow_add]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_mul (hf j) (hg k)
one_mem' i := by
rw [coeff_one]
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
add_mem' hf hg i := by
rw [coeff_add]
exact Ideal.add_mem _ (hf i) (hg i)
zero_mem' i := Ideal.zero_mem _
algebraMap_mem' r i := by
rw [algebraMap_apply, coeff_C]
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
#align rees_algebra reesAlgebra
theorem mem_reesAlgebra_iff (f : R[X]) : f ∈ reesAlgebra I ↔ ∀ i, f.coeff i ∈ I ^ i :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_rees_algebra_iff mem_reesAlgebra_iff
theorem mem_reesAlgebra_iff_support (f : R[X]) :
f ∈ reesAlgebra I ↔ ∀ i ∈ f.support, f.coeff i ∈ I ^ i := by
apply forall_congr'
intro a
rw [mem_support_iff, Iff.comm, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff, Ne, ← imp_iff_not_or]
exact fun e => e.symm ▸ (I ^ a).zero_mem
#align mem_rees_algebra_iff_support mem_reesAlgebra_iff_support
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ReesAlgebra.lean | 76 | 79 | theorem reesAlgebra.monomial_mem {I : Ideal R} {i : ℕ} {r : R} :
monomial i r ∈ reesAlgebra I ↔ r ∈ I ^ i := by |
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [mem_reesAlgebra_iff_support, coeff_monomial, ←
imp_iff_not_or]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatTrans
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Iso
#align_import category_theory.functor.category from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"63721b2c3eba6c325ecf8ae8cca27155a4f6306f"
/-!
# The category of functors and natural transformations between two fixed categories.
We provide the category instance on `C ⥤ D`, with morphisms the natural transformations.
## Universes
If `C` and `D` are both small categories at the same universe level,
this is another small category at that level.
However if `C` and `D` are both large categories at the same universe level,
this is a small category at the next higher level.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
-- declare the `v`'s first; see note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
open NatTrans Category CategoryTheory.Functor
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} D]
attribute [local simp] vcomp_app
variable {C D} {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E]
variable {F G H I : C ⥤ D}
/-- `Functor.category C D` gives the category structure on functors and natural transformations
between categories `C` and `D`.
Notice that if `C` and `D` are both small categories at the same universe level,
this is another small category at that level.
However if `C` and `D` are both large categories at the same universe level,
this is a small category at the next higher level.
-/
instance Functor.category : Category.{max u₁ v₂} (C ⥤ D) where
Hom F G := NatTrans F G
id F := NatTrans.id F
comp α β := vcomp α β
#align category_theory.functor.category CategoryTheory.Functor.category
namespace NatTrans
-- Porting note: the behaviour of `ext` has changed here.
-- We need to provide a copy of the `NatTrans.ext` lemma,
-- written in terms of `F ⟶ G` rather than `NatTrans F G`,
-- or `ext` will not retrieve it from the cache.
@[ext]
theorem ext' {α β : F ⟶ G} (w : α.app = β.app) : α = β := NatTrans.ext _ _ w
@[simp]
theorem vcomp_eq_comp (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) : vcomp α β = α ≫ β := rfl
#align category_theory.nat_trans.vcomp_eq_comp CategoryTheory.NatTrans.vcomp_eq_comp
theorem vcomp_app' (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) (X : C) : (α ≫ β).app X = α.app X ≫ β.app X := rfl
#align category_theory.nat_trans.vcomp_app' CategoryTheory.NatTrans.vcomp_app'
theorem congr_app {α β : F ⟶ G} (h : α = β) (X : C) : α.app X = β.app X := by rw [h]
#align category_theory.nat_trans.congr_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.congr_app
@[simp]
theorem id_app (F : C ⥤ D) (X : C) : (𝟙 F : F ⟶ F).app X = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := rfl
#align category_theory.nat_trans.id_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.id_app
@[simp]
theorem comp_app {F G H : C ⥤ D} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) (X : C) :
(α ≫ β).app X = α.app X ≫ β.app X := rfl
#align category_theory.nat_trans.comp_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.comp_app
attribute [reassoc] comp_app
@[reassoc]
theorem app_naturality {F G : C ⥤ D ⥤ E} (T : F ⟶ G) (X : C) {Y Z : D} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
(F.obj X).map f ≫ (T.app X).app Z = (T.app X).app Y ≫ (G.obj X).map f :=
(T.app X).naturality f
#align category_theory.nat_trans.app_naturality CategoryTheory.NatTrans.app_naturality
@[reassoc]
theorem naturality_app {F G : C ⥤ D ⥤ E} (T : F ⟶ G) (Z : D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F.map f).app Z ≫ (T.app Y).app Z = (T.app X).app Z ≫ (G.map f).app Z :=
congr_fun (congr_arg app (T.naturality f)) Z
#align category_theory.nat_trans.naturality_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.naturality_app
/-- A natural transformation is a monomorphism if each component is. -/
theorem mono_of_mono_app (α : F ⟶ G) [∀ X : C, Mono (α.app X)] : Mono α :=
⟨fun g h eq => by
ext X
rw [← cancel_mono (α.app X), ← comp_app, eq, comp_app]⟩
#align category_theory.nat_trans.mono_of_mono_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mono_of_mono_app
/-- A natural transformation is an epimorphism if each component is. -/
theorem epi_of_epi_app (α : F ⟶ G) [∀ X : C, Epi (α.app X)] : Epi α :=
⟨fun g h eq => by
ext X
rw [← cancel_epi (α.app X), ← comp_app, eq, comp_app]⟩
#align category_theory.nat_trans.epi_of_epi_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.epi_of_epi_app
/-- `hcomp α β` is the horizontal composition of natural transformations. -/
@[simps]
def hcomp {H I : D ⥤ E} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : H ⟶ I) : F ⋙ H ⟶ G ⋙ I where
app := fun X : C => β.app (F.obj X) ≫ I.map (α.app X)
naturality X Y f := by
rw [Functor.comp_map, Functor.comp_map, ← assoc, naturality, assoc, ← map_comp I, naturality,
map_comp, assoc]
#align category_theory.nat_trans.hcomp CategoryTheory.NatTrans.hcomp
#align category_theory.nat_trans.hcomp_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.hcomp_app
/-- Notation for horizontal composition of natural transformations. -/
infixl:80 " ◫ " => hcomp
theorem hcomp_id_app {H : D ⥤ E} (α : F ⟶ G) (X : C) : (α ◫ 𝟙 H).app X = H.map (α.app X) := by
simp
#align category_theory.nat_trans.hcomp_id_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.hcomp_id_app
theorem id_hcomp_app {H : E ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) (X : E) : (𝟙 H ◫ α).app X = α.app _ := by simp
#align category_theory.nat_trans.id_hcomp_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.id_hcomp_app
-- Note that we don't yet prove a `hcomp_assoc` lemma here: even stating it is painful, because we
-- need to use associativity of functor composition. (It's true without the explicit associator,
-- because functor composition is definitionally associative,
-- but relying on the definitional equality causes bad problems with elaboration later.)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Functor/Category.lean | 132 | 134 | theorem exchange {I J K : D ⥤ E} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) (γ : I ⟶ J) (δ : J ⟶ K) :
(α ≫ β) ◫ (γ ≫ δ) = (α ◫ γ) ≫ β ◫ δ := by |
aesop_cat
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Single
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
#align_import algebra.homology.additive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"200eda15d8ff5669854ff6bcc10aaf37cb70498f"
/-!
# Homology is an additive functor
When `V` is preadditive, `HomologicalComplex V c` is also preadditive,
and `homologyFunctor` is additive.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [Preadditive V]
variable {W : Type*} [Category W] [Preadditive W]
variable {W₁ W₂ : Type*} [Category W₁] [Category W₂] [HasZeroMorphisms W₁] [HasZeroMorphisms W₂]
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} {C D E : HomologicalComplex V c}
variable (f g : C ⟶ D) (h k : D ⟶ E) (i : ι)
namespace HomologicalComplex
instance : Zero (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨{ f := fun i => 0 }⟩
instance : Add (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun f g => { f := fun i => f.f i + g.f i }⟩
instance : Neg (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun f => { f := fun i => -f.f i }⟩
instance : Sub (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun f g => { f := fun i => f.f i - g.f i }⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun n f =>
{ f := fun i => n • f.f i
comm' := fun i j _ => by simp [Preadditive.nsmul_comp, Preadditive.comp_nsmul] }⟩
#align homological_complex.has_nat_scalar HomologicalComplex.hasNatScalar
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun n f =>
{ f := fun i => n • f.f i
comm' := fun i j _ => by simp [Preadditive.zsmul_comp, Preadditive.comp_zsmul] }⟩
#align homological_complex.has_int_scalar HomologicalComplex.hasIntScalar
@[simp]
theorem zero_f_apply (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.zero_f_apply HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem add_f_apply (f g : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (f + g).f i = f.f i + g.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.add_f_apply HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem neg_f_apply (f : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (-f).f i = -f.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.neg_f_apply HomologicalComplex.neg_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem sub_f_apply (f g : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (f - g).f i = f.f i - g.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.sub_f_apply HomologicalComplex.sub_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_f_apply (n : ℕ) (f : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (n • f).f i = n • f.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.nsmul_f_apply HomologicalComplex.nsmul_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_f_apply (n : ℤ) (f : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (n • f).f i = n • f.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.zsmul_f_apply HomologicalComplex.zsmul_f_apply
instance : AddCommGroup (C ⟶ D) :=
Function.Injective.addCommGroup Hom.f HomologicalComplex.hom_f_injective
(by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat)
-- Porting note: proofs had to be provided here, otherwise Lean tries to apply
-- `Preadditive.add_comp/comp_add` to `HomologicalComplex V c`
instance : Preadditive (HomologicalComplex V c) where
add_comp _ _ _ f f' g := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, add_f_apply]
rw [Preadditive.add_comp]
comp_add _ _ _ f g g' := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, add_f_apply]
rw [Preadditive.comp_add]
/-- The `i`-th component of a chain map, as an additive map from chain maps to morphisms. -/
@[simps!]
def Hom.fAddMonoidHom {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (i : ι) : (C₁ ⟶ C₂) →+ (C₁.X i ⟶ C₂.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => Hom.f f i) fun _ _ => rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.f_add_monoid_hom HomologicalComplex.Hom.fAddMonoidHom
end HomologicalComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
instance eval_additive (i : ι) : (eval V c i).Additive where
#align homological_complex.eval_additive HomologicalComplex.eval_additive
instance cycles'_additive [HasEqualizers V] : (cycles'Functor V c i).Additive where
#align homological_complex.cycles_additive HomologicalComplex.cycles'_additive
variable [HasImages V] [HasImageMaps V]
instance boundaries_additive : (boundariesFunctor V c i).Additive where
#align homological_complex.boundaries_additive HomologicalComplex.boundaries_additive
variable [HasEqualizers V] [HasCokernels V]
instance homology_additive : (homology'Functor V c i).Additive where
map_add {_ _ f g} := by
dsimp [homology'Functor]
ext
simp only [homology'.π_map, Preadditive.comp_add, ← Preadditive.add_comp]
congr
ext
simp
#align homological_complex.homology_additive HomologicalComplex.homology_additive
end HomologicalComplex
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- An additive functor induces a functor between homological complexes.
This is sometimes called the "prolongation".
-/
@[simps]
def Functor.mapHomologicalComplex (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
HomologicalComplex W₁ c ⥤ HomologicalComplex W₂ c where
obj C :=
{ X := fun i => F.obj (C.X i)
d := fun i j => F.map (C.d i j)
shape := fun i j w => by
dsimp only
rw [C.shape _ _ w, F.map_zero]
d_comp_d' := fun i j k _ _ => by rw [← F.map_comp, C.d_comp_d, F.map_zero] }
map f :=
{ f := fun i => F.map (f.f i)
comm' := fun i j _ => by
dsimp
rw [← F.map_comp, ← F.map_comp, f.comm] }
#align category_theory.functor.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplex
instance (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex c).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance Functor.map_homogical_complex_additive (F : V ⥤ W) [F.Additive] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex c).Additive where
#align category_theory.functor.map_homogical_complex_additive CategoryTheory.Functor.map_homogical_complex_additive
variable (W₁)
/-- The functor on homological complexes induced by the identity functor is
isomorphic to the identity functor. -/
@[simps!]
def Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso (c : ComplexShape ι) :
(𝟭 W₁).mapHomologicalComplex c ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents fun i => Iso.refl _
#align category_theory.functor.map_homological_complex_id_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso
instance Functor.mapHomologicalComplex_reflects_iso (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[ReflectsIsomorphisms F] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
ReflectsIsomorphisms (F.mapHomologicalComplex c) :=
⟨fun f => by
intro
haveI : ∀ n : ι, IsIso (F.map (f.f n)) := fun n =>
((HomologicalComplex.eval W₂ c n).mapIso
(asIso ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map f))).isIso_hom
haveI := fun n => isIso_of_reflects_iso (f.f n) F
exact HomologicalComplex.Hom.isIso_of_components f⟩
#align category_theory.functor.map_homological_complex_reflects_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplex_reflects_iso
variable {W₁}
/-- A natural transformation between functors induces a natural transformation
between those functors applied to homological complexes.
-/
@[simps]
def NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex {F G : W₁ ⥤ W₂}
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (α : F ⟶ G)
(c : ComplexShape ι) : F.mapHomologicalComplex c ⟶ G.mapHomologicalComplex c where
app C := { f := fun i => α.app _ }
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex
@[simp]
theorem NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id
(c : ComplexShape ι) (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] :
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex (𝟙 F) c = 𝟙 (F.mapHomologicalComplex c) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex_id CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id
@[simp]
theorem NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp (c : ComplexShape ι) {F G H : W₁ ⥤ W₂}
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [H.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
(α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) :
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex (α ≫ β) c =
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α c ≫ NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex β c := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex_comp CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_naturality {c : ComplexShape ι} {F G : W₁ ⥤ W₂}
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
(α : F ⟶ G) {C D : HomologicalComplex W₁ c} (f : C ⟶ D) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map f ≫ (NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α c).app D =
(NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α c).app C ≫ (G.mapHomologicalComplex c).map f := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex_naturality CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_naturality
/-- A natural isomorphism between functors induces a natural isomorphism
between those functors applied to homological complexes.
-/
@[simps!]
def NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex {F G : W₁ ⥤ W₂} [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (α : F ≅ G) (c : ComplexShape ι) :
F.mapHomologicalComplex c ≅ G.mapHomologicalComplex c where
hom := NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α.hom c
inv := NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α.inv c
hom_inv_id := by simp only [← NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp, α.hom_inv_id,
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id]
inv_hom_id := by simp only [← NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp, α.inv_hom_id,
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex
/-- An equivalence of categories induces an equivalences between the respective categories
of homological complex.
-/
@[simps]
def Equivalence.mapHomologicalComplex (e : W₁ ≌ W₂) [e.functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
(c : ComplexShape ι) :
HomologicalComplex W₁ c ≌ HomologicalComplex W₂ c where
functor := e.functor.mapHomologicalComplex c
inverse := e.inverse.mapHomologicalComplex c
unitIso :=
(Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso W₁ c).symm ≪≫ NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex e.unitIso c
counitIso := NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex e.counitIso c ≪≫
Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso W₂ c
#align category_theory.equivalence.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.Equivalence.mapHomologicalComplex
end CategoryTheory
namespace ChainComplex
variable {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
theorem map_chain_complex_of (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (X : α → W₁)
(d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj (ChainComplex.of X d sq) =
ChainComplex.of (fun n => F.obj (X n)) (fun n => F.map (d n)) fun n => by
rw [← F.map_comp, sq n, Functor.map_zero] := by
refine HomologicalComplex.ext rfl ?_
rintro i j (rfl : j + 1 = i)
simp only [CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplex_obj_d, of_d, eqToHom_refl, comp_id,
id_comp]
#align chain_complex.map_chain_complex_of ChainComplex.map_chain_complex_of
end ChainComplex
variable [HasZeroObject W₁] [HasZeroObject W₂]
namespace HomologicalComplex
instance (W : Type*) [Category W] [Preadditive W] [HasZeroObject W] [DecidableEq ι] (j : ι) :
(single W c j).Additive where
map_add {_ _ f g} := by ext; simp [single]
variable (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
(c : ComplexShape ι) [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Turning an object into a complex supported at `j` then applying a functor is
the same as applying the functor then forming the complex.
-/
noncomputable def singleMapHomologicalComplex (j : ι) :
single W₁ c j ⋙ F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ≅ F ⋙ single W₂ c j :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun X =>
{ hom := { f := fun i => if h : i = j then eqToHom (by simp [h]) else 0 }
inv := { f := fun i => if h : i = j then eqToHom (by simp [h]) else 0 }
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· rw [zero_comp, ← F.map_id,
(isZero_single_obj_X c j X _ h).eq_of_src (𝟙 _) 0, F.map_zero]
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j _ _ h).eq_of_src })
fun f => by
ext i
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp [single_map_f_self, singleObjXSelf, singleObjXIsoOfEq, eqToHom_map]
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j _ _ h).eq_of_tgt
#align homological_complex.single_map_homological_complex HomologicalComplex.singleMapHomologicalComplex
@[simp]
theorem singleMapHomologicalComplex_hom_app_self (j : ι) (X : W₁) :
((singleMapHomologicalComplex F c j).hom.app X).f j =
F.map (singleObjXSelf c j X).hom ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j (F.obj X)).inv := by
simp [singleMapHomologicalComplex, singleObjXSelf, singleObjXIsoOfEq, eqToHom_map]
#align homological_complex.single_map_homological_complex_hom_app_self HomologicalComplex.singleMapHomologicalComplex_hom_app_self
@[simp]
theorem singleMapHomologicalComplex_hom_app_ne {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (X : W₁) :
((singleMapHomologicalComplex F c j).hom.app X).f i = 0 := by
simp [singleMapHomologicalComplex, h]
#align homological_complex.single_map_homological_complex_hom_app_ne HomologicalComplex.singleMapHomologicalComplex_hom_app_ne
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Additive.lean | 331 | 334 | theorem singleMapHomologicalComplex_inv_app_self (j : ι) (X : W₁) :
((singleMapHomologicalComplex F c j).inv.app X).f j =
(singleObjXSelf c j (F.obj X)).hom ≫ F.map (singleObjXSelf c j X).inv := by |
simp [singleMapHomologicalComplex, singleObjXSelf, singleObjXIsoOfEq, eqToHom_map]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
#align_import data.polynomial.monic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cbdf7b565832144d024caa5a550117c6df0204a5"
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`Monic.mul`, `Monic.map`, `Monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ Subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
#align polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton
theorem not_monic_zero_iff : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
#align polynomial.not_monic_zero_iff Polynomial.not_monic_zero_iff
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ ∀ a b : R, a = b :=
Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans
⟨by
intro
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton], fun h => subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
#align polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton'
theorem Monic.as_sum (hp : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree + ∑ i ∈ range p.natDegree, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm]
suffices C (p.coeff p.natDegree) = 1 by rw [this, one_mul]
exact congr_arg C hp
#align polynomial.monic.as_sum Polynomial.Monic.as_sum
theorem ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_zero] at hq
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp
exact hp rfl
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic Polynomial.ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic
theorem Monic.map [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : Monic p) : Monic (p.map f) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
have : f p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [show _ = _ from hp, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, coeff_map]
suffices p.coeff (p.map f).natDegree = 1 by simp [this]
rwa [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f this)]
#align polynomial.monic.map Polynomial.Monic.map
theorem monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one {b : R} (hp : b * p.leadingCoeff = 1) :
Monic (C b * p) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_C_mul_of_mul_leading_coeff_eq_one Polynomial.monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one
theorem monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one {b : R} (hp : p.leadingCoeff * b = 1) :
Monic (p * C b) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_mul_C_of_leading_coeff_mul_eq_one Polynomial.monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one
theorem monic_of_degree_le (n : ℕ) (H1 : degree p ≤ n) (H2 : coeff p n = 1) : Monic p :=
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : degree p < n => eq_of_zero_eq_one (H2 ▸ (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H).symm) _ _)
fun H : ¬degree p < n => by
rwa [Monic, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, (lt_or_eq_of_le H1).resolve_left H]
#align polynomial.monic_of_degree_le Polynomial.monic_of_degree_le
theorem monic_X_pow_add {n : ℕ} (H : degree p ≤ n) : Monic (X ^ (n + 1) + p) :=
have H1 : degree p < (n + 1 : ℕ) := lt_of_le_of_lt H (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self n))
monic_of_degree_le (n + 1)
(le_trans (degree_add_le _ _) (max_le (degree_X_pow_le _) (le_of_lt H1)))
(by rw [coeff_add, coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H1, add_zero])
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow_add Polynomial.monic_X_pow_add
variable (a) in
theorem monic_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (X ^ n + C a).Monic := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
exact monic_X_pow_add <| degree_C_le.trans Nat.WithBot.coe_nonneg
theorem monic_X_add_C (x : R) : Monic (X + C x) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ monic_X_pow_add_C x one_ne_zero
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_add_C Polynomial.monic_X_add_C
theorem Monic.mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) : Monic (p * q) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then
haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0
Subsingleton.elim _ _
else by
have : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, Ne.symm h0]
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul' this, Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
#align polynomial.monic.mul Polynomial.Monic.mul
theorem Monic.pow (hp : Monic p) : ∀ n : ℕ, Monic (p ^ n)
| 0 => monic_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact (Monic.pow hp n).mul hp
#align polynomial.monic.pow Polynomial.Monic.pow
theorem Monic.add_of_left (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
#align polynomial.monic.add_of_left Polynomial.Monic.add_of_left
theorem Monic.add_of_right (hq : Monic q) (hpq : degree p < degree q) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
#align polynomial.monic.add_of_right Polynomial.Monic.add_of_right
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_left (hp : p.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : q.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hp]
#align polynomial.monic.of_mul_monic_left Polynomial.Monic.of_mul_monic_left
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_right (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : p.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_mul_monic hq]
#align polynomial.monic.of_mul_monic_right Polynomial.Monic.of_mul_monic_right
namespace Monic
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
swap
· rw [h]
exact natDegree_one
have : p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff]
rwa [Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero] at h
rw [this]
rw [← h, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Monic.def.1 hp, C_1]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.degree ≤ 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
rw [← hp.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one Polynomial.Monic.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
nontriviality R
apply natDegree_mul'
simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_mul Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_mul
theorem degree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).degree = (q * p).degree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [degree_mul', hp.degree_mul]
· exact add_comm _ _
· rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.degree_mul_comm Polynomial.Monic.degree_mul_comm
nonrec theorem natDegree_mul' (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_mul']
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_mul' Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_mul'
theorem natDegree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).natDegree = (q * p).natDegree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' h, Polynomial.natDegree_mul', add_comm]
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_mul_comm Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_mul_comm
theorem not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
¬p ∣ q := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' <| right_ne_zero_of_mul h0] at hl
exact hl.not_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align polynomial.monic.not_dvd_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt
theorem not_dvd_of_degree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : degree q < degree p) : ¬p ∣ q :=
Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hp h0 <| natDegree_lt_natDegree h0 hl
#align polynomial.monic.not_dvd_of_degree_lt Polynomial.Monic.not_dvd_of_degree_lt
theorem nextCoeff_mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) :
nextCoeff (p * q) = nextCoeff p + nextCoeff q := by
nontriviality
simp only [← coeff_one_reverse]
rw [reverse_mul] <;>
simp [coeff_mul, antidiagonal, hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff, add_comm,
show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
#align polynomial.monic.next_coeff_mul Polynomial.Monic.nextCoeff_mul
theorem nextCoeff_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).nextCoeff = n • p.nextCoeff := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, zero_smul, ← map_one (f := C), nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).nextCoeff_mul hp, ih, succ_nsmul]
theorem eq_one_of_map_eq_one {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : p.Monic)
(map_eq : p.map f = 1) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
have hdeg : p.degree = 0 := by
rw [← degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f _, map_eq, degree_one]
· rw [hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
have hndeg : p.natDegree = 0 :=
WithBot.coe_eq_coe.mp ((degree_eq_natDegree hp.ne_zero).symm.trans hdeg)
convert eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg
rw [← hndeg, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, hp.leadingCoeff, C.map_one]
#align polynomial.monic.eq_one_of_map_eq_one Polynomial.Monic.eq_one_of_map_eq_one
theorem natDegree_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).natDegree = n * p.natDegree := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).natDegree_mul hp, hn, Nat.succ_mul, add_comm]
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_pow Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_pow
end Monic
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_pow_X_add_C [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) (r : R) : ((X + C r) ^ n).natDegree = n := by
rw [(monic_X_add_C r).natDegree_pow, natDegree_X_add_C, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow_X_add_C Polynomial.natDegree_pow_X_add_C
theorem Monic.eq_one_of_isUnit (hm : Monic p) (hpu : IsUnit p) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨q, h⟩ := hpu.exists_right_inv
have := hm.natDegree_mul' (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h)
rw [h, natDegree_one, eq_comm, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact hm.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one.mp this.1
#align polynomial.monic.eq_one_of_is_unit Polynomial.Monic.eq_one_of_isUnit
theorem Monic.isUnit_iff (hm : p.Monic) : IsUnit p ↔ p = 1 :=
⟨hm.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h => h.symm ▸ isUnit_one⟩
#align polynomial.monic.is_unit_iff Polynomial.Monic.isUnit_iff
theorem eq_of_monic_of_associated (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : Associated p q) : p = q := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := hpq
rw [(hp.of_mul_monic_left hq).eq_one_of_isUnit u.isUnit, mul_one]
#align polynomial.eq_of_monic_of_associated Polynomial.eq_of_monic_of_associated
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_multiset_prod_of_monic (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (ht : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (t.map f).prod := by
revert ht
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_; · simp
intro a t ih ht
rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons]
exact (ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)).mul (ih fun _ hi => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi))
#align polynomial.monic_multiset_prod_of_monic Polynomial.monic_multiset_prod_of_monic
theorem monic_prod_of_monic (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic s.1 f hs
#align polynomial.monic_prod_of_monic Polynomial.monic_prod_of_monic
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (t.map f).prod = (t.map fun i => nextCoeff (f i)).sum := by
revert h
refine Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t ih ht => ?_
· simp only [Multiset.not_mem_zero, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false, Multiset.map_zero,
Multiset.prod_zero, Multiset.sum_zero, not_false_iff, forall_true_iff]
rw [← C_1]
rw [nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.sum_cons,
Monic.nextCoeff_mul, ih]
exacts [fun i hi => ht i (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi), ht a (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _),
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ fun b bs => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem bs)]
#align polynomial.monic.next_coeff_multiset_prod Polynomial.Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, nextCoeff (f i) :=
Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod s.1 f h
#align polynomial.monic.next_coeff_prod Polynomial.Monic.nextCoeff_prod
end CommSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem Monic.natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).natDegree = P.natDegree := by
refine le_antisymm (natDegree_map_le _ _) (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ?_)
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.nat_degree_map Polynomial.Monic.natDegree_map
@[simp]
theorem Monic.degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).degree = P.degree := by
by_cases hP : P = 0
· simp [hP]
· refine le_antisymm (degree_map_le _ _) ?_
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hP]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
#align polynomial.monic.degree_map Polynomial.Monic.degree_map
section Injective
open Function
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} (hf : Injective f)
theorem degree_map_eq_of_injective (p : R[X]) : degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else
degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [← f.map_zero]; exact mt hf.eq_iff.1 (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h))
#align polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_injective Polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_injective
theorem natDegree_map_eq_of_injective (p : R[X]) : natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_injective hf p)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_map_eq_of_injective Polynomial.natDegree_map_eq_of_injective
theorem leadingCoeff_map' (p : R[X]) : leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_map' Polynomial.leadingCoeff_map'
theorem nextCoeff_map (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).nextCoeff = f p.nextCoeff := by
unfold nextCoeff
rw [natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
#align polynomial.next_coeff_map Polynomial.nextCoeff_map
theorem leadingCoeff_of_injective (p : R[X]) : leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
delta leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map f, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
#align polynomial.leading_coeff_of_injective Polynomial.leadingCoeff_of_injective
theorem monic_of_injective {p : R[X]} (hp : (p.map f).Monic) : p.Monic := by
apply hf
rw [← leadingCoeff_of_injective hf, hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
#align polynomial.monic_of_injective Polynomial.monic_of_injective
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.monic_map_iff {p : R[X]} : p.Monic ↔ (p.map f).Monic :=
⟨Monic.map _, Polynomial.monic_of_injective hf⟩
#align function.injective.monic_map_iff Function.Injective.monic_map_iff
end Injective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_X_sub_C (x : R) : Monic (X - C x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using monic_X_add_C (-x)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_sub_C Polynomial.monic_X_sub_C
theorem monic_X_pow_sub {n : ℕ} (H : degree p ≤ n) : Monic (X ^ (n + 1) - p) := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add (show degree (-p) ≤ n by rwa [← degree_neg p] at H)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub Polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub
/-- `X ^ n - a` is monic. -/
theorem monic_X_pow_sub_C {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R) {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n - C a).Monic := by
simpa only [map_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add_C (-a) h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub_C Polynomial.monic_X_pow_sub_C
theorem not_isUnit_X_pow_sub_one (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
¬IsUnit (X ^ n - 1 : R[X]) := by
intro h
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp at h
apply hn
rw [← @natDegree_one R, ← (monic_X_pow_sub_C _ hn).eq_one_of_isUnit h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.not_is_unit_X_pow_sub_one Polynomial.not_isUnit_X_pow_sub_one
theorem Monic.sub_of_left {p q : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) :
Monic (p - q) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply hp.add_of_left
rwa [degree_neg]
#align polynomial.monic.sub_of_left Polynomial.Monic.sub_of_left
theorem Monic.sub_of_right {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.leadingCoeff = -1) (hpq : degree p < degree q) :
Monic (p - q) := by
have : (-q).coeff (-q).natDegree = 1 := by
rw [natDegree_neg, coeff_neg, show q.coeff q.natDegree = -1 from hq, neg_neg]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply Monic.add_of_right this
rwa [degree_neg]
#align polynomial.monic.sub_of_right Polynomial.Monic.sub_of_right
end Ring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem not_monic_zero : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) :=
not_monic_zero_iff.mp zero_ne_one
#align polynomial.not_monic_zero Polynomial.not_monic_zero
end NonzeroSemiring
section NotZeroDivisor
-- TODO: using gh-8537, rephrase lemmas that involve commutation around `*` using the op-ring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem Monic.mul_left_ne_zero (hp : Monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) : q * p ≠ 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· simpa [h]
rw [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul, WithBot.add_eq_bot, not_or, degree_eq_bot]
refine ⟨hq, ?_⟩
rw [← hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h
refine (lt_trans ?_ h).ne'
simp
#align polynomial.monic.mul_left_ne_zero Polynomial.Monic.mul_left_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul_right_ne_zero (hp : Monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) : p * q ≠ 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· simpa [h]
rw [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul_comm, hp.degree_mul, WithBot.add_eq_bot, not_or,
degree_eq_bot]
refine ⟨hq, ?_⟩
rw [← hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h
refine (lt_trans ?_ h).ne'
simp
#align polynomial.monic.mul_right_ne_zero Polynomial.Monic.mul_right_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul_natDegree_lt_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} :
(p * q).natDegree < p.natDegree ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· suffices 0 < p.natDegree ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 by simpa [hq, ← h.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one]
exact ⟨fun h => h.ne', fun h => lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) h.symm⟩
· simp [h.natDegree_mul', hq]
#align polynomial.monic.mul_nat_degree_lt_iff Polynomial.Monic.mul_natDegree_lt_iff
theorem Monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} : p * q = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0 <;> simp [h.mul_right_ne_zero, hq]
#align polynomial.monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.Monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff
theorem Monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} : q * p = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0 <;> simp [h.mul_left_ne_zero, hq]
#align polynomial.monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.Monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff
theorem Monic.isRegular {R : Type*} [Ring R] {p : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) : IsRegular p := by
constructor
· intro q r h
dsimp only at h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hp.mul_right_eq_zero_iff, mul_sub, h, sub_self]
· intro q r h
simp only at h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hp.mul_left_eq_zero_iff, sub_mul, h, sub_self]
#align polynomial.monic.is_regular Polynomial.Monic.isRegular
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monic.lean | 496 | 507 | theorem degree_smul_of_smul_regular {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] {k : S}
(p : R[X]) (h : IsSMulRegular R k) : (k • p).degree = p.degree := by |
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [degree_le_iff_coeff_zero]
intro m hm
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
simp [hm m le_rfl]
· rw [degree_le_iff_coeff_zero]
intro m hm
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
refine h ?_
simpa using hm m le_rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Equiv.piFinSucc 2 G).trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, Function.funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, apply_eq_self, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ (inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1 := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.coe_fin_one, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 166 | 173 | theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ (inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2 := by |
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Counit
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Invertible
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Defs
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9556784a5b84697562e9c6acb40500d4a82e675a"
/-!
# Witt vectors
This file verifies that the ring operations on `WittVector p R`
satisfy the axioms of a commutative ring.
## Main definitions
* `WittVector.map`: lifts a ring homomorphism `R →+* S` to a ring homomorphism `𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 S`.
* `WittVector.ghostComponent n x`: evaluates the `n`th Witt polynomial
on the first `n` coefficients of `x`, producing a value in `R`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
* `WittVector.ghostMap`: a ring homomorphism `𝕎 R →+* (ℕ → R)`, obtained by packaging
all the ghost components together.
If `p` is invertible in `R`, then the ghost map is an equivalence,
which we use to define the ring operations on `𝕎 R`.
* `WittVector.CommRing`: the ring structure induced by the ghost components.
## Notation
We use notation `𝕎 R`, entered `\bbW`, for the Witt vectors over `R`.
## Implementation details
As we prove that the ghost components respect the ring operations, we face a number of repetitive
proofs. To avoid duplicating code we factor these proofs into a custom tactic, only slightly more
powerful than a tactic macro. This tactic is not particularly useful outside of its applications
in this file.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable section
open MvPolynomial Function
variable {p : ℕ} {R S T : Type*} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing T]
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
local notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- type as `\bbW`
open scoped Witt
namespace WittVector
/-- `f : α → β` induces a map from `𝕎 α` to `𝕎 β` by applying `f` componentwise.
If `f` is a ring homomorphism, then so is `f`, see `WittVector.map f`. -/
def mapFun (f : α → β) : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β := fun x => mk _ (f ∘ x.coeff)
#align witt_vector.map_fun WittVector.mapFun
namespace mapFun
-- Porting note: switched the proof to tactic mode. I think that `ext` was the issue.
theorem injective (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f) : Injective (mapFun f : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β) := by
intros _ _ h
ext p
exact hf (congr_arg (fun x => coeff x p) h : _)
#align witt_vector.map_fun.injective WittVector.mapFun.injective
theorem surjective (f : α → β) (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (mapFun f : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β) := fun x =>
⟨mk _ fun n => Classical.choose <| hf <| x.coeff n,
by ext n; simp only [mapFun, coeff_mk, comp_apply, Classical.choose_spec (hf (x.coeff n))]⟩
#align witt_vector.map_fun.surjective WittVector.mapFun.surjective
-- Porting note: using `(x y : 𝕎 R)` instead of `(x y : WittVector p R)` produced sorries.
variable (f : R →+* S) (x y : WittVector p R)
/-- Auxiliary tactic for showing that `mapFun` respects the ring operations. -/
-- porting note: a very crude port.
macro "map_fun_tac" : tactic => `(tactic| (
ext n
simp only [mapFun, mk, comp_apply, zero_coeff, map_zero,
-- Porting note: the lemmas on the next line do not have the `simp` tag in mathlib4
add_coeff, sub_coeff, mul_coeff, neg_coeff, nsmul_coeff, zsmul_coeff, pow_coeff,
peval, map_aeval, algebraMap_int_eq, coe_eval₂Hom] <;>
try { cases n <;> simp <;> done } <;> -- Porting note: this line solves `one`
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl <;>
ext ⟨i, k⟩ <;>
fin_cases i <;> rfl))
-- and until `pow`.
-- We do not tag these lemmas as `@[simp]` because they will be bundled in `map` later on.
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Basic.lean | 102 | 102 | theorem zero : mapFun f (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := by | map_fun_tac
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
#align_import topology.uniform_space.cauchy from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"22131150f88a2d125713ffa0f4693e3355b1eb49"
/-!
# Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
universe u v
open scoped Classical
open Filter TopologicalSpace Set UniformSpace Function
open scoped Classical
open Uniformity Topology Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniformSpace : UniformSpace α]
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
NeBot f ∧ f ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓤 α
#align cauchy Cauchy
/-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f`
has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/
def IsComplete (s : Set α) :=
∀ f, Cauchy f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, f ≤ 𝓝 x
#align is_complete IsComplete
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchy_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s i :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
(f.basis_sets.prod_self.le_basis_iff h).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
#align filter.has_basis.cauchy_iff Filter.HasBasis.cauchy_iff
theorem cauchy_iff' {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff
#align cauchy_iff' cauchy_iff'
theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} : Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
cauchy_iff'.trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
#align cauchy_iff cauchy_iff
lemma cauchy_iff_le {l : Filter α} [hl : l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ l ×ˢ l ≤ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [Cauchy, hl, true_and]
theorem Cauchy.ultrafilter_of {l : Filter α} (h : Cauchy l) :
Cauchy (@Ultrafilter.of _ l h.1 : Filter α) := by
haveI := h.1
have := Ultrafilter.of_le l
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.neBot _, (Filter.prod_mono this this).trans h.2⟩
#align cauchy.ultrafilter_of Cauchy.ultrafilter_of
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Cauchy.lean | 70 | 72 | theorem cauchy_map_iff {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ NeBot l ∧ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) := by |
rw [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, Tendsto]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Alena Gusakov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Grade
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sups
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
#align_import combinatorics.set_family.shadow from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Shadows
This file defines shadows of a set family. The shadow of a set family is the set family of sets we
get by removing any element from any set of the original family. If one pictures `Finset α` as a big
hypercube (each dimension being membership of a given element), then taking the shadow corresponds
to projecting each finset down once in all available directions.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.shadow`: The shadow of a set family. Everything we can get by removing a new element from
some set.
* `Finset.upShadow`: The upper shadow of a set family. Everything we can get by adding an element
to some set.
## Notation
We define notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `∂ 𝒜`: Shadow of `𝒜`.
* `∂⁺ 𝒜`: Upper shadow of `𝒜`.
We also maintain the convention that `a, b : α` are elements of the ground type, `s, t : Finset α`
are finsets, and `𝒜, ℬ : Finset (Finset α)` are finset families.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
* http://discretemath.imp.fu-berlin.de/DMII-2015-16/kruskal.pdf
## Tags
shadow, set family
-/
open Finset Nat
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Shadow
variable [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α} {a : α} {k r : ℕ}
/-- The shadow of a set family `𝒜` is all sets we can get by removing one element from any set in
`𝒜`, and the (`k` times) iterated shadow (`shadow^[k]`) is all sets we can get by removing `k`
elements from any set in `𝒜`. -/
def shadow (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
𝒜.sup fun s => s.image (erase s)
#align finset.shadow Finset.shadow
-- Porting note: added `inherit_doc` to calm linter
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FinsetFamily] notation:max "∂ " => Finset.shadow
-- Porting note: had to open FinsetFamily
open FinsetFamily
/-- The shadow of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem shadow_empty : ∂ (∅ : Finset (Finset α)) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.shadow_empty Finset.shadow_empty
@[simp] lemma shadow_iterate_empty (k : ℕ) : ∂^[k] (∅ : Finset (Finset α)) = ∅ := by
induction' k <;> simp [*, shadow_empty]
@[simp]
theorem shadow_singleton_empty : ∂ ({∅} : Finset (Finset α)) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.shadow_singleton_empty Finset.shadow_singleton_empty
--TODO: Prove `∂ {{a}} = {∅}` quickly using `covers` and `GradeOrder`
/-- The shadow is monotone. -/
@[mono]
theorem shadow_monotone : Monotone (shadow : Finset (Finset α) → Finset (Finset α)) := fun _ _ =>
sup_mono
#align finset.shadow_monotone Finset.shadow_monotone
/-- `t` is in the shadow of `𝒜` iff there is a `s ∈ 𝒜` from which we can remove one element to
get `t`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, ∃ a ∈ s, erase s a = t := by
simp only [shadow, mem_sup, mem_image]
#align finset.mem_shadow_iff Finset.mem_shadow_iff
theorem erase_mem_shadow (hs : s ∈ 𝒜) (ha : a ∈ s) : erase s a ∈ ∂ 𝒜 :=
mem_shadow_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align finset.erase_mem_shadow Finset.erase_mem_shadow
/-- `t ∈ ∂𝒜` iff `t` is exactly one element less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ (s \ t).card = 1 := by
simp_rw [mem_shadow_iff, ← covBy_iff_card_sdiff_eq_one, covBy_iff_exists_erase]
/-- `t` is in the shadow of `𝒜` iff we can add an element to it so that the resulting finset is in
`𝒜`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff_insert_mem : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ a ∉ t, insert a t ∈ 𝒜 := by
simp_rw [mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff, ← covBy_iff_card_sdiff_eq_one, covBy_iff_exists_insert]
aesop
#align finset.mem_shadow_iff_insert_mem Finset.mem_shadow_iff_insert_mem
/-- `s ∈ ∂ 𝒜` iff `s` is exactly one element less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one :
t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ s.card = t.card + 1 := by
refine mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff.trans <| exists_congr fun t ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦
and_congr_right fun hst ↦ ?_
rw [card_sdiff hst, tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le, add_comm]
exact card_mono hst
#align finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one Finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one
lemma mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_card :
t ∈ ∂^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ u : Finset α, u.card = k ∧ Disjoint t u ∧ t ∪ u ∈ 𝒜 := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing t
· simp
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp only [mem_shadow_iff_insert_mem, ih, Function.iterate_succ_apply', card_eq_succ]
aesop
/-- `t ∈ ∂^k 𝒜` iff `t` is exactly `k` elements less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff : t ∈ ∂^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ (s \ t).card = k := by
rw [mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_card]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl, htu, hsuA⟩
exact ⟨_, hsuA, subset_union_left, by rw [union_sdiff_cancel_left htu]⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hts, rfl⟩
refine ⟨s \ t, rfl, disjoint_sdiff, ?_⟩
rwa [union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_eq_right.2 hts]
/-- `t ∈ ∂^k 𝒜` iff `t` is exactly `k` elements less than something in `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_mem_card_add :
t ∈ ∂^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ s.card = t.card + k := by
refine mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff.trans <| exists_congr fun t ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦
and_congr_right fun hst ↦ ?_
rw [card_sdiff hst, tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le, add_comm]
exact card_mono hst
#align finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add Finset.mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_mem_card_add
/-- The shadow of a family of `r`-sets is a family of `r - 1`-sets. -/
protected theorem _root_.Set.Sized.shadow (h𝒜 : (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized r) :
(∂ 𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized (r - 1) := by
intro A h
obtain ⟨A, hA, i, hi, rfl⟩ := mem_shadow_iff.1 h
rw [card_erase_of_mem hi, h𝒜 hA]
#align finset.set.sized.shadow Set.Sized.shadow
/-- The `k`-th shadow of a family of `r`-sets is a family of `r - k`-sets. -/
lemma _root_.Set.Sized.shadow_iterate (h𝒜 : (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized r) :
(∂^[k] 𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized (r - k) := by
simp_rw [Set.Sized, mem_coe, mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff]
rintro t ⟨s, hs, hts, rfl⟩
rw [card_sdiff hts, ← h𝒜 hs, Nat.sub_sub_self (card_le_card hts)]
theorem sized_shadow_iff (h : ∅ ∉ 𝒜) :
(∂ 𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized r ↔ (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized (r + 1) := by
refine ⟨fun h𝒜 s hs => ?_, Set.Sized.shadow⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hs h)
rw [← h𝒜 (erase_mem_shadow hs ha), card_erase_add_one ha]
#align finset.sized_shadow_iff Finset.sized_shadow_iff
/-- Being in the shadow of `𝒜` means we have a superset in `𝒜`. -/
lemma exists_subset_of_mem_shadow (hs : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜) : ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ht, hst⟩ := mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one.1 hs
⟨t, ht, hst.1⟩
#align finset.exists_subset_of_mem_shadow Finset.exists_subset_of_mem_shadow
end Shadow
open FinsetFamily
section UpShadow
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α} {a : α} {k r : ℕ}
/-- The upper shadow of a set family `𝒜` is all sets we can get by adding one element to any set in
`𝒜`, and the (`k` times) iterated upper shadow (`upShadow^[k]`) is all sets we can get by adding
`k` elements from any set in `𝒜`. -/
def upShadow (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
𝒜.sup fun s => sᶜ.image fun a => insert a s
#align finset.up_shadow Finset.upShadow
-- Porting note: added `inherit_doc` to calm linter
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FinsetFamily] notation:max "∂⁺ " => Finset.upShadow
/-- The upper shadow of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem upShadow_empty : ∂⁺ (∅ : Finset (Finset α)) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.up_shadow_empty Finset.upShadow_empty
/-- The upper shadow is monotone. -/
@[mono]
theorem upShadow_monotone : Monotone (upShadow : Finset (Finset α) → Finset (Finset α)) :=
fun _ _ => sup_mono
#align finset.up_shadow_monotone Finset.upShadow_monotone
/-- `t` is in the upper shadow of `𝒜` iff there is a `s ∈ 𝒜` from which we can remove one element
to get `t`. -/
lemma mem_upShadow_iff : t ∈ ∂⁺ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t := by
simp_rw [upShadow, mem_sup, mem_image, mem_compl]
#align finset.mem_up_shadow_iff Finset.mem_upShadow_iff
theorem insert_mem_upShadow (hs : s ∈ 𝒜) (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ∈ ∂⁺ 𝒜 :=
mem_upShadow_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align finset.insert_mem_up_shadow Finset.insert_mem_upShadow
/-- `t` is in the upper shadow of `𝒜` iff `t` is exactly one element more than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one`. -/
lemma mem_upShadow_iff_exists_sdiff : t ∈ ∂⁺ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, s ⊆ t ∧ (t \ s).card = 1 := by
simp_rw [mem_upShadow_iff, ← covBy_iff_card_sdiff_eq_one, covBy_iff_exists_insert]
/-- `t` is in the upper shadow of `𝒜` iff we can remove an element from it so that the resulting
finset is in `𝒜`. -/
lemma mem_upShadow_iff_erase_mem : t ∈ ∂⁺ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ t ∧ erase t a ∈ 𝒜 := by
simp_rw [mem_upShadow_iff_exists_sdiff, ← covBy_iff_card_sdiff_eq_one, covBy_iff_exists_erase]
aesop
#align finset.mem_up_shadow_iff_erase_mem Finset.mem_upShadow_iff_erase_mem
/-- `t` is in the upper shadow of `𝒜` iff `t` is exactly one element less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_upShadow_iff_exists_sdiff`. -/
lemma mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one :
t ∈ ∂⁺ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, s ⊆ t ∧ t.card = s.card + 1 := by
refine mem_upShadow_iff_exists_sdiff.trans <| exists_congr fun t ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦
and_congr_right fun hst ↦ ?_
rw [card_sdiff hst, tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le, add_comm]
exact card_mono hst
#align finset.mem_up_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one Finset.mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one
lemma mem_upShadow_iterate_iff_exists_card :
t ∈ ∂⁺^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ u : Finset α, u.card = k ∧ u ⊆ t ∧ t \ u ∈ 𝒜 := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing t
· simp
simp only [mem_upShadow_iff_erase_mem, ih, Function.iterate_succ_apply', card_eq_succ,
subset_erase, erase_sdiff_comm, ← sdiff_insert]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, hat, u, rfl, ⟨hut, hau⟩, htu⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, _, hau, rfl, rfl⟩, insert_subset hat hut, htu⟩
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨a, u, hau, rfl, rfl⟩, hut, htu⟩
rw [insert_subset_iff] at hut
exact ⟨a, hut.1, _, rfl, ⟨hut.2, hau⟩, htu⟩
/-- `t` is in the upper shadow of `𝒜` iff `t` is exactly `k` elements less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add`. -/
lemma mem_upShadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff :
t ∈ ∂⁺^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, s ⊆ t ∧ (t \ s).card = k := by
rw [mem_upShadow_iterate_iff_exists_card]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl, hut, htu⟩
exact ⟨_, htu, sdiff_subset, by rw [sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hut]⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hst, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, rfl, sdiff_subset, by rwa [sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hst]⟩
/-- `t ∈ ∂⁺^k 𝒜` iff `t` is exactly `k` elements less than something in `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_upShadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff`. -/
lemma mem_upShadow_iterate_iff_exists_mem_card_add :
t ∈ ∂⁺^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, s ⊆ t ∧ t.card = s.card + k := by
refine mem_upShadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff.trans <| exists_congr fun t ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦
and_congr_right fun hst ↦ ?_
rw [card_sdiff hst, tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le, add_comm]
exact card_mono hst
/-- The upper shadow of a family of `r`-sets is a family of `r + 1`-sets. -/
protected lemma _root_.Set.Sized.upShadow (h𝒜 : (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized r) :
(∂⁺ 𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized (r + 1) := by
intro A h
obtain ⟨A, hA, i, hi, rfl⟩ := mem_upShadow_iff.1 h
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem hi, h𝒜 hA]
#align finset.set.sized.up_shadow Set.Sized.upShadow
/-- Being in the upper shadow of `𝒜` means we have a superset in `𝒜`. -/
theorem exists_subset_of_mem_upShadow (hs : s ∈ ∂⁺ 𝒜) : ∃ t ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ht, hts, _⟩ := mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one.1 hs
⟨t, ht, hts⟩
#align finset.exists_subset_of_mem_up_shadow Finset.exists_subset_of_mem_upShadow
/-- `t ∈ ∂^k 𝒜` iff `t` is exactly `k` elements more than something in `𝒜`. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Shadow.lean | 297 | 322 | theorem mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add :
s ∈ ∂⁺ ^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ t.card + k = s.card := by |
induction' k with k ih generalizing 𝒜 s
· refine ⟨fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.refl _, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, hst, hcard⟩
rwa [← eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hcard.ge]
simp only [exists_prop, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ]
refine ih.trans ?_
clear ih
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hts, hcardst⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu, hut, hcardtu⟩ := mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one.1 ht
refine ⟨u, hu, hut.trans hts, ?_⟩
rw [← hcardst, hcardtu, add_right_comm]
rfl
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hts, hcard⟩
obtain ⟨u, htu, hus, hu⟩ :=
Finset.exists_intermediate_set 1
(by
rw [add_comm, ← hcard]
exact add_le_add_left (succ_le_of_lt (zero_lt_succ _)) _)
hts
rw [add_comm] at hu
refine ⟨u, mem_upShadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one.2 ⟨t, ht, htu, hu⟩, hus, ?_⟩
rw [hu, ← hcard, add_right_comm]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Interval
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.multiset.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals of multisets
This file provides the `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for `Multiset α` and calculates the
cardinality of its finite intervals.
## Implementation notes
We implement the intervals via the intervals on `DFinsupp`, rather than via filtering
`Multiset.Powerset`; this is because `(Multiset.replicate n x).Powerset` has `2^n` entries not `n+1`
entries as it contains duplicates. We do not go via `Finsupp` as this would be noncomputable, and
multisets are typically used computationally.
-/
open Finset DFinsupp Function
open Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (Multiset α) :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc (Multiset α)
(fun s t => (Finset.Icc (toDFinsupp s) (toDFinsupp t)).map
Multiset.equivDFinsupp.toEquiv.symm.toEmbedding)
fun s t x => by simp
theorem Icc_eq :
Finset.Icc s t = (Finset.Icc (toDFinsupp s) (toDFinsupp t)).map
Multiset.equivDFinsupp.toEquiv.symm.toEmbedding :=
rfl
#align multiset.Icc_eq Multiset.Icc_eq
theorem uIcc_eq :
uIcc s t =
(uIcc (toDFinsupp s) (toDFinsupp t)).map Multiset.equivDFinsupp.toEquiv.symm.toEmbedding :=
(Icc_eq _ _).trans <| by simp [uIcc]
#align multiset.uIcc_eq Multiset.uIcc_eq
theorem card_Icc :
(Finset.Icc s t).card = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset, (t.count i + 1 - s.count i) := by
simp_rw [Icc_eq, Finset.card_map, DFinsupp.card_Icc, Nat.card_Icc, Multiset.toDFinsupp_apply,
toDFinsupp_support]
#align multiset.card_Icc Multiset.card_Icc
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Interval.lean | 62 | 64 | theorem card_Ico :
(Finset.Ico s t).card = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset, (t.count i + 1 - s.count i) - 1 := by |
rw [Finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury G. Kudryashov, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
#align_import algebra.monoid_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
/-!
# Monoid algebras
When the domain of a `Finsupp` has a multiplicative or additive structure, we can define
a convolution product. To mathematicians this structure is known as the "monoid algebra",
i.e. the finite formal linear combinations over a given semiring of elements of the monoid.
The "group ring" ℤ[G] or the "group algebra" k[G] are typical uses.
In fact the construction of the "monoid algebra" makes sense when `G` is not even a monoid, but
merely a magma, i.e., when `G` carries a multiplication which is not required to satisfy any
conditions at all. In this case the construction yields a not-necessarily-unital,
not-necessarily-associative algebra but it is still adjoint to the forgetful functor from such
algebras to magmas, and we prove this as `MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma`.
In this file we define `MonoidAlgebra k G := G →₀ k`, and `AddMonoidAlgebra k G`
in the same way, and then define the convolution product on these.
When the domain is additive, this is used to define polynomials:
```
Polynomial R := AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
MvPolynomial σ α := AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
```
When the domain is multiplicative, e.g. a group, this will be used to define the group ring.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `R[A]` for `AddMonoidAlgebra R A`.
## Implementation note
Unfortunately because additive and multiplicative structures both appear in both cases,
it doesn't appear to be possible to make much use of `to_additive`, and we just settle for
saying everything twice.
Similarly, I attempted to just define
`k[G] := MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G)`, but the definitional equality
`Multiplicative G = G` leaks through everywhere, and seems impossible to use.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
section
variable [Semiring k]
/-- The monoid algebra over a semiring `k` generated by the monoid `G`.
It is the type of finite formal `k`-linear combinations of terms of `G`,
endowed with the convolution product.
-/
def MonoidAlgebra : Type max u₁ u₂ :=
G →₀ k
#align monoid_algebra MonoidAlgebra
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance MonoidAlgebra.inhabited : Inhabited (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (G →₀ k))
#align monoid_algebra.inhabited MonoidAlgebra.inhabited
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance MonoidAlgebra.addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (G →₀ k))
#align monoid_algebra.add_comm_monoid MonoidAlgebra.addCommMonoid
instance MonoidAlgebra.instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd k] : IsCancelAdd (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsCancelAdd (G →₀ k))
instance MonoidAlgebra.coeFun : CoeFun (MonoidAlgebra k G) fun _ => G → k :=
Finsupp.instCoeFun
#align monoid_algebra.has_coe_to_fun MonoidAlgebra.coeFun
end
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
section
variable [Semiring k] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`, so we replace some definitions and theorems with
-- new ones which have new types.
abbrev single (a : G) (b : k) : MonoidAlgebra k G := Finsupp.single a b
theorem single_zero (a : G) : (single a 0 : MonoidAlgebra k G) = 0 := Finsupp.single_zero a
theorem single_add (a : G) (b₁ b₂ : k) : single a (b₁ + b₂) = single a b₁ + single a b₂ :=
Finsupp.single_add a b₁ b₂
@[simp]
theorem sum_single_index {N} [AddCommMonoid N] {a : G} {b : k} {h : G → k → N}
(h_zero : h a 0 = 0) :
(single a b).sum h = h a b := Finsupp.sum_single_index h_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_single (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) : f.sum single = f :=
Finsupp.sum_single f
theorem single_apply {a a' : G} {b : k} [Decidable (a = a')] :
single a b a' = if a = a' then b else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero {a : G} {b : k} : single a b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := Finsupp.single_eq_zero
abbrev mapDomain {G' : Type*} (f : G → G') (v : MonoidAlgebra k G) : MonoidAlgebra k G' :=
Finsupp.mapDomain f v
theorem mapDomain_sum {k' G' : Type*} [Semiring k'] {f : G → G'} {s : MonoidAlgebra k' G}
{v : G → k' → MonoidAlgebra k G} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
Finsupp.mapDomain_sum
/-- A non-commutative version of `MonoidAlgebra.lift`: given an additive homomorphism `f : k →+ R`
and a homomorphism `g : G → R`, returns the additive homomorphism from
`MonoidAlgebra k G` such that `liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g a`. If `f` is a ring homomorphism
and the range of either `f` or `g` is in center of `R`, then the result is a ring homomorphism. If
`R` is a `k`-algebra and `f = algebraMap k R`, then the result is an algebra homomorphism called
`MonoidAlgebra.lift`. -/
def liftNC (f : k →+ R) (g : G → R) : MonoidAlgebra k G →+ R :=
liftAddHom fun x : G => (AddMonoidHom.mulRight (g x)).comp f
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc MonoidAlgebra.liftNC
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_single (f : k →+ R) (g : G → R) (a : G) (b : k) :
liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g a :=
liftAddHom_apply_single _ _ _
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_single MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_single
end
section Mul
variable [Semiring k] [Mul G]
/-- The multiplication in a monoid algebra. We make it irreducible so that Lean doesn't unfold
it trying to unify two things that are different. -/
@[irreducible] def mul' (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) : MonoidAlgebra k G :=
f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
/-- The product of `f g : MonoidAlgebra k G` is the finitely supported function
whose value at `a` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all pairs `x, y`
such that `x * y = a`. (Think of the group ring of a group.) -/
instance instMul : Mul (MonoidAlgebra k G) := ⟨MonoidAlgebra.mul'⟩
#align monoid_algebra.has_mul MonoidAlgebra.instMul
theorem mul_def {f g : MonoidAlgebra k G} :
f * g = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
#align monoid_algebra.mul_def MonoidAlgebra.mul_def
instance nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ Finsupp.instAddCommMonoid with
-- Porting note: `refine` & `exact` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
left_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_add_index ?_ ?_)) ?_ <;>
simp only [mul_add, mul_zero, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_add]
right_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (sum_add_index ?_ ?_) ?_ <;>
simp only [add_mul, zero_mul, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_zero, sum_add]
zero_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact sum_zero_index
mul_zero := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_zero_index)) sum_zero }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem liftNC_mul {g_hom : Type*} [FunLike g_hom G R] [MulHomClass g_hom G R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) (a b : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(h_comm : ∀ {x y}, y ∈ a.support → Commute (f (b x)) (g y)) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g (a * b) = liftNC (f : k →+ R) g a * liftNC (f : k →+ R) g b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← sum_single a, ← sum_single b]
-- Porting note: `(liftNC _ g).map_finsupp_sum` → `map_finsupp_sum`
simp_rw [mul_def, map_finsupp_sum, liftNC_single, Finsupp.sum_mul, Finsupp.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun y hy => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _hx => ?_
simp [mul_assoc, (h_comm hy).left_comm]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_mul MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_mul
end Mul
section Semigroup
variable [Semiring k] [Semigroup G] [Semiring R]
instance nonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
mul_assoc := fun f g h => by
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp only [mul_def]
rw [sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₁ b₁
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₂ b₂
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_single_index]; congr; ext a₃ b₃
rw [sum_single_index, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
all_goals simp only [single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, add_mul,
mul_add, zero_mul, mul_zero, sum_zero, sum_add] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring
end Semigroup
section One
variable [NonAssocSemiring R] [Semiring k] [One G]
/-- The unit of the multiplication is `single 1 1`, i.e. the function
that is `1` at `1` and zero elsewhere. -/
instance one : One (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨single 1 1⟩
#align monoid_algebra.has_one MonoidAlgebra.one
theorem one_def : (1 : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single 1 1 :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.one_def MonoidAlgebra.one_def
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_one {g_hom : Type*} [FunLike g_hom G R] [OneHomClass g_hom G R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g 1 = 1 := by simp [one_def]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_one MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_one
end One
section MulOneClass
variable [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G]
instance nonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
natCast := fun n => single 1 n
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ := fun _ => by simp; rfl
one_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, zero_mul, single_zero, sum_zero, zero_add,
one_mul, sum_single]
mul_one := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, mul_zero, single_zero, sum_zero, add_zero,
mul_one, sum_single] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_assoc_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring
theorem natCast_def (n : ℕ) : (n : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single (1 : G) (n : k) :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.nat_cast_def MonoidAlgebra.natCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_def := natCast_def
end MulOneClass
/-! #### Semiring structure -/
section Semiring
variable [Semiring k] [Monoid G]
instance semiring : Semiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring,
MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.semiring MonoidAlgebra.semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `liftNC` as a `RingHom`, for when `f x` and `g y` commute -/
def liftNCRingHom (f : k →+* R) (g : G →* R) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra k G →+* R :=
{ liftNC (f : k →+ R) g with
map_one' := liftNC_one _ _
map_mul' := fun _a _b => liftNC_mul _ _ _ _ fun {_ _} _ => h_comm _ _ }
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_ring_hom MonoidAlgebra.liftNCRingHom
end Semiring
instance nonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring k] [CommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
simp only [mul_def, Finsupp.sum, mul_comm]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
simp only [mul_comm] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring
instance nontrivial [Semiring k] [Nontrivial k] [Nonempty G] : Nontrivial (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.instNontrivial
#align monoid_algebra.nontrivial MonoidAlgebra.nontrivial
/-! #### Derived instances -/
section DerivedInstances
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring k] [CommMonoid G] : CommSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, MonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.comm_semiring MonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance unique [Semiring k] [Subsingleton k] : Unique (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.uniqueOfRight
#align monoid_algebra.unique MonoidAlgebra.unique
instance addCommGroup [Ring k] : AddCommGroup (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.instAddCommGroup
#align monoid_algebra.add_comm_group MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup
instance nonUnitalNonAssocRing [Ring k] [Mul G] : NonUnitalNonAssocRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocRing
instance nonUnitalRing [Ring k] [Semigroup G] : NonUnitalRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing
instance nonAssocRing [Ring k] [MulOneClass G] : NonAssocRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup,
MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with
intCast := fun z => single 1 (z : k)
-- Porting note: Both were `simpa`.
intCast_ofNat := fun n => by simp; rfl
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by simp; rfl }
#align monoid_algebra.non_assoc_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing
theorem intCast_def [Ring k] [MulOneClass G] (z : ℤ) :
(z : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single (1 : G) (z : k) :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.int_cast_def MonoidAlgebra.intCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_def := intCast_def
instance ring [Ring k] [Monoid G] : Ring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing, MonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.ring MonoidAlgebra.ring
instance nonUnitalCommRing [CommRing k] [CommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing
instance commRing [CommRing k] [CommMonoid G] : CommRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing, MonoidAlgebra.ring with }
#align monoid_algebra.comm_ring MonoidAlgebra.commRing
variable {S : Type*}
instance smulZeroClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] : SMulZeroClass R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.smulZeroClass
#align monoid_algebra.smul_zero_class MonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance distribSMul [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] : DistribSMul R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.distribSMul _ _
#align monoid_algebra.distrib_smul MonoidAlgebra.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction [Monoid R] [Semiring k] [DistribMulAction R k] :
DistribMulAction R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.distribMulAction G k
#align monoid_algebra.distrib_mul_action MonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance module [Semiring R] [Semiring k] [Module R k] : Module R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.module G k
#align monoid_algebra.module MonoidAlgebra.module
instance faithfulSMul [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [FaithfulSMul R k] [Nonempty G] :
FaithfulSMul R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.faithfulSMul
#align monoid_algebra.has_faithful_smul MonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance isScalarTower [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S k] : IsScalarTower R S (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.isScalarTower G k
#align monoid_algebra.is_scalar_tower MonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMulCommClass R S k] :
SMulCommClass R S (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.smulCommClass G k
#align monoid_algebra.smul_comm_tower MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ k]
[IsCentralScalar R k] : IsCentralScalar R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.isCentralScalar G k
#align monoid_algebra.is_central_scalar MonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
/-- This is not an instance as it conflicts with `MonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction` when `G = kˣ`.
-/
def comapDistribMulActionSelf [Group G] [Semiring k] : DistribMulAction G (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.comapDistribMulAction
#align monoid_algebra.comap_distrib_mul_action_self MonoidAlgebra.comapDistribMulActionSelf
end DerivedInstances
section MiscTheorems
variable [Semiring k]
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
theorem mul_apply [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) :
(f * g) x = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => if a₁ * a₂ = x then b₁ * b₂ else 0 := by
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
rw [mul_def, Finsupp.sum_apply]; congr; ext
rw [Finsupp.sum_apply]; congr; ext
apply single_apply
#align monoid_algebra.mul_apply MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply
theorem mul_apply_antidiagonal [Mul G] (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) (s : Finset (G × G))
(hs : ∀ {p : G × G}, p ∈ s ↔ p.1 * p.2 = x) : (f * g) x = ∑ p ∈ s, f p.1 * g p.2 := by
classical exact
let F : G × G → k := fun p => if p.1 * p.2 = x then f p.1 * g p.2 else 0
calc
(f * g) x = ∑ a₁ ∈ f.support, ∑ a₂ ∈ g.support, F (a₁, a₂) := mul_apply f g x
_ = ∑ p ∈ f.support ×ˢ g.support, F p := Finset.sum_product.symm
_ = ∑ p ∈ (f.support ×ˢ g.support).filter fun p : G × G => p.1 * p.2 = x, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
(Finset.sum_filter _ _).symm
_ = ∑ p ∈ s.filter fun p : G × G => p.1 ∈ f.support ∧ p.2 ∈ g.support, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
(sum_congr
(by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_product, hs, and_comm])
fun _ _ => rfl)
_ = ∑ p ∈ s, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun p hps hp => by
simp only [mem_filter, mem_support_iff, not_and, Classical.not_not] at hp ⊢
by_cases h1 : f p.1 = 0
· rw [h1, zero_mul]
· rw [hp hps h1, mul_zero]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem single_mul_single [Mul G] {a₁ a₂ : G} {b₁ b₂ : k} :
single a₁ b₁ * single a₂ b₂ = single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by
rw [mul_def]
exact (sum_single_index (by simp only [zero_mul, single_zero, sum_zero])).trans
(sum_single_index (by rw [mul_zero, single_zero]))
#align monoid_algebra.single_mul_single MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
theorem single_commute_single [Mul G] {a₁ a₂ : G} {b₁ b₂ : k}
(ha : Commute a₁ a₂) (hb : Commute b₁ b₂) :
Commute (single a₁ b₁) (single a₂ b₂) :=
single_mul_single.trans <| congr_arg₂ single ha hb |>.trans single_mul_single.symm
theorem single_commute [Mul G] {a : G} {b : k} (ha : ∀ a', Commute a a') (hb : ∀ b', Commute b b') :
∀ f : MonoidAlgebra k G, Commute (single a b) f :=
suffices AddMonoidHom.mulLeft (single a b) = AddMonoidHom.mulRight (single a b) from
DFunLike.congr_fun this
addHom_ext' fun a' => AddMonoidHom.ext fun b' => single_commute_single (ha a') (hb b')
@[simp]
theorem single_pow [Monoid G] {a : G} {b : k} : ∀ n : ℕ, single a b ^ n = single (a ^ n) (b ^ n)
| 0 => by
simp only [pow_zero]
rfl
| n + 1 => by simp only [pow_succ, single_pow n, single_mul_single]
#align monoid_algebra.single_pow MonoidAlgebra.single_pow
section
/-- Like `Finsupp.mapDomain_zero`, but for the `1` we define in this file -/
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_one {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} [Semiring β] [One α] [One α₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F α α₂] [OneHomClass F α α₂] (f : F) :
(mapDomain f (1 : MonoidAlgebra β α) : MonoidAlgebra β α₂) = (1 : MonoidAlgebra β α₂) := by
simp_rw [one_def, mapDomain_single, map_one]
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_one MonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_one
/-- Like `Finsupp.mapDomain_add`, but for the convolutive multiplication we define in this file -/
theorem mapDomain_mul {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} [Semiring β] [Mul α] [Mul α₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F α α₂] [MulHomClass F α α₂] (f : F) (x y : MonoidAlgebra β α) :
mapDomain f (x * y) = mapDomain f x * mapDomain f y := by
simp_rw [mul_def, mapDomain_sum, mapDomain_single, map_mul]
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
· congr
ext a b
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
· simp
· simp [mul_add]
· simp
· simp [add_mul]
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_mul MonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_mul
variable (k G)
/-- The embedding of a magma into its magma algebra. -/
@[simps]
def ofMagma [Mul G] : G →ₙ* MonoidAlgebra k G where
toFun a := single a 1
map_mul' a b := by simp only [mul_def, mul_one, sum_single_index, single_eq_zero, mul_zero]
#align monoid_algebra.of_magma MonoidAlgebra.ofMagma
#align monoid_algebra.of_magma_apply MonoidAlgebra.ofMagma_apply
/-- The embedding of a unital magma into its magma algebra. -/
@[simps]
def of [MulOneClass G] : G →* MonoidAlgebra k G :=
{ ofMagma k G with
toFun := fun a => single a 1
map_one' := rfl }
#align monoid_algebra.of MonoidAlgebra.of
#align monoid_algebra.of_apply MonoidAlgebra.of_apply
end
theorem smul_of [MulOneClass G] (g : G) (r : k) : r • of k G g = single g r := by
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp`.
rw [of_apply, smul_single', mul_one]
#align monoid_algebra.smul_of MonoidAlgebra.smul_of
theorem of_injective [MulOneClass G] [Nontrivial k] :
Function.Injective (of k G) := fun a b h => by
simpa using (single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _).mp h
#align monoid_algebra.of_injective MonoidAlgebra.of_injective
theorem of_commute [MulOneClass G] {a : G} (h : ∀ a', Commute a a') (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
Commute (of k G a) f :=
single_commute h Commute.one_left f
/-- `Finsupp.single` as a `MonoidHom` from the product type into the monoid algebra.
Note the order of the elements of the product are reversed compared to the arguments of
`Finsupp.single`.
-/
@[simps]
def singleHom [MulOneClass G] : k × G →* MonoidAlgebra k G where
toFun a := single a.2 a.1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _a _b := single_mul_single.symm
#align monoid_algebra.single_hom MonoidAlgebra.singleHom
#align monoid_algebra.single_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.singleHom_apply
theorem mul_single_apply_aux [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k} {x y z : G}
(H : ∀ a, a * x = z ↔ a = y) : (f * single x r) z = f y * r := by
classical exact
have A :
∀ a₁ b₁,
((single x r).sum fun a₂ b₂ => ite (a₁ * a₂ = z) (b₁ * b₂) 0) =
ite (a₁ * x = z) (b₁ * r) 0 :=
fun a₁ b₁ => sum_single_index <| by simp
calc
(HMul.hMul (β := MonoidAlgebra k G) f (single x r)) z =
sum f fun a b => if a = y then b * r else 0 := by simp only [mul_apply, A, H]
_ = if y ∈ f.support then f y * r else 0 := f.support.sum_ite_eq' _ _
_ = f y * r := by split_ifs with h <;> simp at h <;> simp [h]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply_aux MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux
theorem mul_single_one_apply [MulOneClass G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (x : G) :
(HMul.hMul (β := MonoidAlgebra k G) f (single 1 r)) x = f x * r :=
f.mul_single_apply_aux fun a => by rw [mul_one]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_single_one_apply MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_one_apply
theorem mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_mul [Mul G] (r : k) {g g' : G} (x : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(h : ¬∃ d, g' = d * g) : (x * single g r) g' = 0 := by
classical
rw [mul_apply, Finsupp.sum_comm, Finsupp.sum_single_index]
swap
· simp_rw [Finsupp.sum, mul_zero, ite_self, Finset.sum_const_zero]
· apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
simp_rw [ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro g'' _hg'' rfl
exfalso
exact h ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_mul MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_mul
theorem single_mul_apply_aux [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k} {x y z : G}
(H : ∀ a, x * a = y ↔ a = z) : (single x r * f) y = r * f z := by
classical exact
have : (f.sum fun a b => ite (x * a = y) (0 * b) 0) = 0 := by simp
calc
(HMul.hMul (α := MonoidAlgebra k G) (single x r) f) y =
sum f fun a b => ite (x * a = y) (r * b) 0 :=
(mul_apply _ _ _).trans <| sum_single_index this
_ = f.sum fun a b => ite (a = z) (r * b) 0 := by simp only [H]
_ = if z ∈ f.support then r * f z else 0 := f.support.sum_ite_eq' _ _
_ = _ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp at h <;> simp [h]
#align monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply_aux MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux
theorem single_one_mul_apply [MulOneClass G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (x : G) :
(single (1 : G) r * f) x = r * f x :=
f.single_mul_apply_aux fun a => by rw [one_mul]
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_mul_apply MonoidAlgebra.single_one_mul_apply
theorem single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_mul [Mul G] (r : k) {g g' : G} (x : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(h : ¬∃ d, g' = g * d) : (single g r * x) g' = 0 := by
classical
rw [mul_apply, Finsupp.sum_single_index]
swap
· simp_rw [Finsupp.sum, zero_mul, ite_self, Finset.sum_const_zero]
· apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
simp_rw [ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro g'' _hg'' rfl
exfalso
exact h ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_mul MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_mul
theorem liftNC_smul [MulOneClass G] {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (f : k →+* R) (g : G →* R) (c : k)
(φ : MonoidAlgebra k G) : liftNC (f : k →+ R) g (c • φ) = f c * liftNC (f : k →+ R) g φ := by
suffices (liftNC (↑f) g).comp (smulAddHom k (MonoidAlgebra k G) c) =
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft (f c)).comp (liftNC (↑f) g) from
DFunLike.congr_fun this φ
-- Porting note: `ext` couldn't a find appropriate theorem.
refine addHom_ext' fun a => AddMonoidHom.ext fun b => ?_
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so the proof gets more complex.
unfold MonoidAlgebra
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, singleAddHom_apply, smulAddHom_apply,
smul_single, smul_eq_mul, AddMonoidHom.coe_mulLeft]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [liftNC_single, liftNC_single]; rw [AddMonoidHom.coe_coe, map_mul, mul_assoc]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_smul MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_smul
end MiscTheorems
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Mul G]
instance isScalarTower_self [IsScalarTower R k k] :
IsScalarTower R (MonoidAlgebra k G) (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨fun t a b => by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
refine Finsupp.ext fun m => ?_
-- Porting note: `refine` & `rw` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
classical
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_apply]
rw [coe_smul]
refine Eq.trans (sum_smul_index' (g := a) (b := t) ?_) ?_ <;>
simp only [mul_apply, Finsupp.smul_sum, smul_ite, smul_mul_assoc,
zero_mul, ite_self, imp_true_iff, sum_zero, Pi.smul_apply, smul_zero]⟩
#align monoid_algebra.is_scalar_tower_self MonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self
/-- Note that if `k` is a `CommSemiring` then we have `SMulCommClass k k k` and so we can take
`R = k` in the below. In other words, if the coefficients are commutative amongst themselves, they
also commute with the algebra multiplication. -/
instance smulCommClass_self [SMulCommClass R k k] :
SMulCommClass R (MonoidAlgebra k G) (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨fun t a b => by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
refine Finsupp.ext fun m => ?_
-- Porting note: `refine` & `rw` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
classical
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_apply]
rw [coe_smul]
refine Eq.symm (Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum a)
(funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_smul_index' (g := b) (b := t) ?_)) ?_) <;>
simp only [mul_apply, Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, smul_ite, mul_smul_comm,
imp_true_iff, ite_eq_right_iff, Pi.smul_apply, mul_zero, smul_zero]⟩
#align monoid_algebra.smul_comm_class_self MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self
instance smulCommClass_symm_self [SMulCommClass k R k] :
SMulCommClass (MonoidAlgebra k G) R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨fun t a b => by
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm k R k
rw [← smul_comm]⟩
#align monoid_algebra.smul_comm_class_symm_self MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_symm_self
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.to_distribMulActionHom_injective <|
Finsupp.distribMulActionHom_ext' fun a => DistribMulActionHom.ext_ring (h a)
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_alg_hom_ext MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_alg_hom_ext' MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext'
/-- The functor `G ↦ MonoidAlgebra k G`, from the category of magmas to the category of non-unital,
non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(G →ₙ* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A) where
toFun f :=
{ liftAddHom fun x => (smulAddHom k A).flip (f x) with
toFun := fun a => a.sum fun m t => t • f m
map_smul' := fun t' a => by
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
beta_reduce
rw [Finsupp.smul_sum, sum_smul_index']
· simp_rw [smul_assoc, MonoidHom.id_apply]
· intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
map_mul' := fun a₁ a₂ => by
let g : G → k → A := fun m t => t • f m
have h₁ : ∀ m, g m 0 = 0 := by
intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
have h₂ : ∀ (m) (t₁ t₂ : k), g m (t₁ + t₂) = g m t₁ + g m t₂ := by
intros
rw [← add_smul]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp_rw [Finsupp.mul_sum, Finsupp.sum_mul, smul_mul_smul, ← f.map_mul, mul_def,
sum_comm a₂ a₁]
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_single_index (h₁ _)] }
invFun F := F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)
left_inv f := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
right_inv F := by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (MulHom.ext fun m => ?_)`
refine nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (MulHom.ext fun m => ?_)
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_magma MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma
#align monoid_algebra.lift_magma_apply_apply MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma_apply_apply
#align monoid_algebra.lift_magma_symm_apply MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma_symm_apply
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
theorem single_one_comm [CommSemiring k] [MulOneClass G] (r : k) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
single (1 : G) r * f = f * single (1 : G) r :=
single_commute Commute.one_left (Commute.all _) f
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_comm MonoidAlgebra.single_one_comm
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as a `RingHom` -/
@[simps]
def singleOneRingHom [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G] : k →+* MonoidAlgebra k G :=
{ Finsupp.singleAddHom 1 with
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun x y => by
-- Porting note (#10691): Was `rw`.
simp only [ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom_coe, singleAddHom_apply,
single_mul_single, mul_one] }
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_ring_hom MonoidAlgebra.singleOneRingHom
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_ring_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.singleOneRingHom_apply
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a ring homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainRingHom (k : Type*) {H F : Type*} [Semiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
[FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) : MonoidAlgebra k G →+* MonoidAlgebra k H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra k G →+ MonoidAlgebra k H) with
map_one' := mapDomain_one f
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y }
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_ring_hom MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainRingHom
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_ring_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainRingHom_apply
/-- If two ring homomorphisms from `MonoidAlgebra k G` are equal on all `single a 1`
and `single 1 b`, then they are equal. -/
theorem ringHom_ext {R} [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G] [Semiring R] {f g : MonoidAlgebra k G →+* R}
(h₁ : ∀ b, f (single 1 b) = g (single 1 b)) (h_of : ∀ a, f (single a 1) = g (single a 1)) :
f = g :=
RingHom.coe_addMonoidHom_injective <|
addHom_ext fun a b => by
rw [← single, ← one_mul a, ← mul_one b, ← single_mul_single]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [AddMonoidHom.coe_coe f, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe g]; rw [f.map_mul, g.map_mul, h₁, h_of]
#align monoid_algebra.ring_hom_ext MonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext
/-- If two ring homomorphisms from `MonoidAlgebra k G` are equal on all `single a 1`
and `single 1 b`, then they are equal.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem ringHom_ext' {R} [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G] [Semiring R] {f g : MonoidAlgebra k G →+* R}
(h₁ : f.comp singleOneRingHom = g.comp singleOneRingHom)
(h_of :
(f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* R).comp (of k G) = (g : MonoidAlgebra k G →* R).comp (of k G)) :
f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.congr_fun h₁) (DFunLike.congr_fun h_of)
#align monoid_algebra.ring_hom_ext' MonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext'
/-- The instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G)` whenever we have `Algebra k A`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra k G)`.
-/
instance algebra {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G) :=
{ singleOneRingHom.comp (algebraMap k A) with
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
smul_def' := fun r a => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
-- Porting note: Newly required.
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_one_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_one_mul_apply, mul_single_one_apply, Algebra.commutes] }
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleOneAlgHom {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G :=
{ singleOneRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp
rfl }
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_alg_hom MonoidAlgebra.singleOneAlgHom
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_alg_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.singleOneAlgHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
⇑(algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) = single 1 ∘ algebraMap k A :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.coe_algebra_map MonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap
theorem single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a b = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) b * of k G a := by simp
#align monoid_algebra.single_eq_algebra_map_mul_of MonoidAlgebra.single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of
theorem single_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap_mul_of {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A]
[Algebra k A] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a (algebraMap k A b) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) b * of A G a := by simp
#align monoid_algebra.single_algebra_map_eq_algebra_map_mul_of MonoidAlgebra.single_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap_mul_of
theorem induction_on [Semiring k] [Monoid G] {p : MonoidAlgebra k G → Prop} (f : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(hM : ∀ g, p (of k G g)) (hadd : ∀ f g : MonoidAlgebra k G, p f → p g → p (f + g))
(hsmul : ∀ (r : k) (f), p f → p (r • f)) : p f := by
refine Finsupp.induction_linear f ?_ (fun f g hf hg => hadd f g hf hg) fun g r => ?_
· simpa using hsmul 0 (of k G 1) (hM 1)
· convert hsmul r (of k G g) (hM g)
-- Porting note: Was `simp only`.
rw [of_apply, smul_single', mul_one]
#align monoid_algebra.induction_on MonoidAlgebra.induction_on
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_alg_hom MonoidAlgebra.liftNCAlgHom
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective <| Finsupp.lhom_ext' fun a => LinearMap.ext_ring (h a)
#align monoid_algebra.alg_hom_ext MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext
-- Porting note: The priority must be `high`.
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h :
(φ₁ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
#align monoid_algebra.alg_hom_ext' MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext'
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (G →* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) where
invFun f := (f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun F := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
right_inv F := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
#align monoid_algebra.lift MonoidAlgebra.lift
variable {k G H A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F a :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.lift_apply' MonoidAlgebra.lift_apply'
theorem lift_apply (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F a := by simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_apply MonoidAlgebra.lift_apply
theorem lift_def (F : G →* A) : ⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.lift_def MonoidAlgebra.lift_def
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (x : G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x 1) :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.lift_symm_apply MonoidAlgebra.lift_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : G →* A) (a b) : lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F a := by
rw [lift_def, liftNC_single, Algebra.smul_def, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_single MonoidAlgebra.lift_single
theorem lift_of (F : G →* A) (x) : lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := by simp
#align monoid_algebra.lift_of MonoidAlgebra.lift_of
theorem lift_unique' (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
#align monoid_algebra.lift_unique' MonoidAlgebra.lift_unique'
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_unique MonoidAlgebra.lift_unique
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two magmas, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between their magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] [FunLike F G H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₙₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_non_unital_alg_hom MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_non_unital_alg_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom_apply
variable (A) in
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap {F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) r) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A H) r := by
simp only [coe_algebraMap, mapDomain_single, map_one, (· ∘ ·)]
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_algebra_map MonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_algebraMap
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {H F : Type*}
[Monoid H] [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_alg_hom MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainAlgHom
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_alg_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainAlgHom_apply
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (MonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (MonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [MonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[Monoid G₁] [Monoid G₂] [Monoid G₃] (f : G₁ →* G₂) (g : G₂ →* G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`MonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃* H) : MonoidAlgebra A G ≃ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃* H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (MulEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end lift
section
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
variable (k)
/-- When `V` is a `k[G]`-module, multiplication by a group element `g` is a `k`-linear map. -/
def GroupSMul.linearMap [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G) : V →ₗ[k] V where
toFun v := single g (1 : k) • v
map_add' x y := smul_add (single g (1 : k)) x y
map_smul' _c _x := smul_algebra_smul_comm _ _ _
#align monoid_algebra.group_smul.linear_map MonoidAlgebra.GroupSMul.linearMap
@[simp]
theorem GroupSMul.linearMap_apply [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V]
[Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G)
(v : V) : (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g) v = single g (1 : k) • v :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.group_smul.linear_map_apply MonoidAlgebra.GroupSMul.linearMap_apply
section
variable {k}
variable [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] {V : Type u₃} {W : Type u₄} [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [AddCommMonoid W]
[Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
(f : V →ₗ[k] W)
(h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v)
/-- Build a `k[G]`-linear map from a `k`-linear map and evidence that it is `G`-equivariant. -/
def equivariantOfLinearOfComm : V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W where
toFun := f
map_add' v v' := by simp
map_smul' c v := by
-- Porting note: Was `apply`.
refine Finsupp.induction c ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro g r c' _nm _nz w
dsimp at *
simp only [add_smul, f.map_add, w, add_left_inj, single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of, ← smul_smul]
erw [algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, f.map_smul,
h g v, of_apply]
#align monoid_algebra.equivariant_of_linear_of_comm MonoidAlgebra.equivariantOfLinearOfComm
@[simp]
theorem equivariantOfLinearOfComm_apply (v : V) : (equivariantOfLinearOfComm f h) v = f v :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.equivariant_of_linear_of_comm_apply MonoidAlgebra.equivariantOfLinearOfComm_apply
end
end
section
universe ui
variable {ι : Type ui}
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
theorem prod_single [CommSemiring k] [CommMonoid G] {s : Finset ι} {a : ι → G} {b : ι → k} :
(∏ i ∈ s, single (a i) (b i)) = single (∏ i ∈ s, a i) (∏ i ∈ s, b i) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s rfl fun a s has ih => by
rw [prod_cons has, ih, single_mul_single, prod_cons has, prod_cons has]
#align monoid_algebra.prod_single MonoidAlgebra.prod_single
end
section
-- We now prove some additional statements that hold for group algebras.
variable [Semiring k] [Group G]
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
@[simp]
theorem mul_single_apply (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (x y : G) :
(f * single x r) y = f (y * x⁻¹) * r :=
f.mul_single_apply_aux fun _a => eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq.symm
#align monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_mul_apply (r : k) (x : G) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (y : G) :
(single x r * f) y = r * f (x⁻¹ * y) :=
f.single_mul_apply_aux fun _z => eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq.symm
#align monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply
theorem mul_apply_left (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) :
(f * g) x = f.sum fun a b => b * g (a⁻¹ * x) :=
calc
(f * g) x = sum f fun a b => (single a b * g) x := by
rw [← Finsupp.sum_apply, ← Finsupp.sum_mul g f, f.sum_single]
_ = _ := by simp only [single_mul_apply, Finsupp.sum]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_apply_left MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_left
-- If we'd assumed `CommSemiring`, we could deduce this from `mul_apply_left`.
theorem mul_apply_right (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) :
(f * g) x = g.sum fun a b => f (x * a⁻¹) * b :=
calc
(f * g) x = sum g fun a b => (f * single a b) x := by
rw [← Finsupp.sum_apply, ← Finsupp.mul_sum f g, g.sum_single]
_ = _ := by simp only [mul_single_apply, Finsupp.sum]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_apply_right MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_right
end
section Opposite
open Finsupp MulOpposite
variable [Semiring k]
/-- The opposite of a `MonoidAlgebra R I` equivalent as a ring to
the `MonoidAlgebra Rᵐᵒᵖ Iᵐᵒᵖ` over the opposite ring, taking elements to their opposite. -/
@[simps! (config := { simpRhs := true }) apply symm_apply]
protected noncomputable def opRingEquiv [Monoid G] :
(MonoidAlgebra k G)ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* MonoidAlgebra kᵐᵒᵖ Gᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ opAddEquiv.symm.trans <|
(Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv (opAddEquiv : k ≃+ kᵐᵒᵖ)).trans <| Finsupp.domCongr opEquiv with
map_mul' := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, AddEquiv.toEquiv_eq_coe]; erw [AddEquiv.coe_toEquiv]
rw [← AddEquiv.coe_toAddMonoidHom]
refine Iff.mpr (AddMonoidHom.map_mul_iff (R := (MonoidAlgebra k G)ᵐᵒᵖ)
(S := MonoidAlgebra kᵐᵒᵖ Gᵐᵒᵖ) _) ?_
-- Porting note: Was `ext`.
refine AddMonoidHom.mul_op_ext _ _ <| addHom_ext' fun i₁ => AddMonoidHom.ext fun r₁ =>
AddMonoidHom.mul_op_ext _ _ <| addHom_ext' fun i₂ => AddMonoidHom.ext fun r₂ => ?_
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, AddEquiv.coe_toAddMonoidHom, opAddEquiv_apply,
Function.comp_apply, singleAddHom_apply, AddMonoidHom.compr₂_apply, AddMonoidHom.coe_mul,
AddMonoidHom.coe_mulLeft, AddMonoidHom.compl₂_apply]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [AddEquiv.trans_apply, AddEquiv.trans_apply, AddEquiv.trans_apply, AddEquiv.trans_apply,
AddEquiv.trans_apply, AddEquiv.trans_apply, MulOpposite.opAddEquiv_symm_apply]
rw [MulOpposite.unop_mul (α := MonoidAlgebra k G)]
-- This was not needed before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [unop_op, unop_op, single_mul_single]
simp }
#align monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv MonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv
#align monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_apply MonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_apply
#align monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_symm_apply MonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_symm_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem opRingEquiv_single [Monoid G] (r : k) (x : G) :
MonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv (op (single x r)) = single (op x) (op r) := by simp
#align monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_single MonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_single
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_single [Monoid G] (r : kᵐᵒᵖ) (x : Gᵐᵒᵖ) :
MonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv.symm (single x r) = op (single x.unop r.unop) := by simp
#align monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_symm_single MonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_symm_single
end Opposite
section Submodule
variable [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G]
variable {V : Type*} [AddCommMonoid V]
variable [Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
/-- A submodule over `k` which is stable under scalar multiplication by elements of `G` is a
submodule over `MonoidAlgebra k G` -/
def submoduleOfSMulMem (W : Submodule k V) (h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), v ∈ W → of k G g • v ∈ W) :
Submodule (MonoidAlgebra k G) V where
carrier := W
zero_mem' := W.zero_mem'
add_mem' := W.add_mem'
smul_mem' := by
intro f v hv
rw [← Finsupp.sum_single f, Finsupp.sum, Finset.sum_smul]
simp_rw [← smul_of, smul_assoc]
exact Submodule.sum_smul_mem W _ fun g _ => h g v hv
#align monoid_algebra.submodule_of_smul_mem MonoidAlgebra.submoduleOfSMulMem
end Submodule
end MonoidAlgebra
/-! ### Additive monoids -/
section
variable [Semiring k]
/-- The monoid algebra over a semiring `k` generated by the additive monoid `G`.
It is the type of finite formal `k`-linear combinations of terms of `G`,
endowed with the convolution product.
-/
def AddMonoidAlgebra :=
G →₀ k
#align add_monoid_algebra AddMonoidAlgebra
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[AddMonoidAlgebra] notation:9000 R:max "[" A "]" => AddMonoidAlgebra R A
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance inhabited : Inhabited k[G] :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (G →₀ k))
#align add_monoid_algebra.inhabited AddMonoidAlgebra.inhabited
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid k[G] :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (G →₀ k))
#align add_monoid_algebra.add_comm_monoid AddMonoidAlgebra.addCommMonoid
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd k] : IsCancelAdd (AddMonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsCancelAdd (G →₀ k))
instance coeFun : CoeFun k[G] fun _ => G → k :=
Finsupp.instCoeFun
#align add_monoid_algebra.has_coe_to_fun AddMonoidAlgebra.coeFun
end AddMonoidAlgebra
end
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
section
variable [Semiring k] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`, so we replace some definitions and theorems with
-- new ones which have new types.
abbrev single (a : G) (b : k) : k[G] := Finsupp.single a b
theorem single_zero (a : G) : (single a 0 : k[G]) = 0 := Finsupp.single_zero a
theorem single_add (a : G) (b₁ b₂ : k) : single a (b₁ + b₂) = single a b₁ + single a b₂ :=
Finsupp.single_add a b₁ b₂
@[simp]
theorem sum_single_index {N} [AddCommMonoid N] {a : G} {b : k} {h : G → k → N}
(h_zero : h a 0 = 0) :
(single a b).sum h = h a b := Finsupp.sum_single_index h_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_single (f : k[G]) : f.sum single = f :=
Finsupp.sum_single f
theorem single_apply {a a' : G} {b : k} [Decidable (a = a')] :
single a b a' = if a = a' then b else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero {a : G} {b : k} : single a b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := Finsupp.single_eq_zero
abbrev mapDomain {G' : Type*} (f : G → G') (v : k[G]) : k[G'] :=
Finsupp.mapDomain f v
theorem mapDomain_sum {k' G' : Type*} [Semiring k'] {f : G → G'} {s : AddMonoidAlgebra k' G}
{v : G → k' → k[G]} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
Finsupp.mapDomain_sum
theorem mapDomain_single {G' : Type*} {f : G → G'} {a : G} {b : k} :
mapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b :=
Finsupp.mapDomain_single
/-- A non-commutative version of `AddMonoidAlgebra.lift`: given an additive homomorphism
`f : k →+ R` and a map `g : Multiplicative G → R`, returns the additive
homomorphism from `k[G]` such that `liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g a`. If `f`
is a ring homomorphism and the range of either `f` or `g` is in center of `R`, then the result is a
ring homomorphism. If `R` is a `k`-algebra and `f = algebraMap k R`, then the result is an algebra
homomorphism called `AddMonoidAlgebra.lift`. -/
def liftNC (f : k →+ R) (g : Multiplicative G → R) : k[G] →+ R :=
liftAddHom fun x : G => (AddMonoidHom.mulRight (g <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)).comp f
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_nc AddMonoidAlgebra.liftNC
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_single (f : k →+ R) (g : Multiplicative G → R) (a : G) (b : k) :
liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
liftAddHom_apply_single _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_nc_single AddMonoidAlgebra.liftNC_single
end
section Mul
variable [Semiring k] [Add G]
/-- The product of `f g : k[G]` is the finitely supported function
whose value at `a` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all pairs `x, y`
such that `x + y = a`. (Think of the product of multivariate
polynomials where `α` is the additive monoid of monomial exponents.) -/
instance hasMul : Mul k[G] :=
⟨fun f g => MonoidAlgebra.mul' (G := Multiplicative G) f g⟩
#align add_monoid_algebra.has_mul AddMonoidAlgebra.hasMul
theorem mul_def {f g : k[G]} :
f * g = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => single (a₁ + a₂) (b₁ * b₂) :=
MonoidAlgebra.mul_def (G := Multiplicative G)
#align add_monoid_algebra.mul_def AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
instance nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring k[G] :=
{ Finsupp.instAddCommMonoid with
-- Porting note: `refine` & `exact` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
left_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_add_index ?_ ?_)) ?_ <;>
simp only [mul_add, mul_zero, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_add]
right_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (sum_add_index ?_ ?_) ?_ <;>
simp only [add_mul, zero_mul, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_zero, sum_add]
zero_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact sum_zero_index
mul_zero := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_zero_index)) sum_zero
nsmul := fun n f => n • f
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
nsmul_zero := by
intros
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [-nsmul_eq_mul, add_smul]
nsmul_succ := by
intros
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [-nsmul_eq_mul, add_smul] }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem liftNC_mul {g_hom : Type*}
[FunLike g_hom (Multiplicative G) R] [MulHomClass g_hom (Multiplicative G) R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) (a b : k[G])
(h_comm : ∀ {x y}, y ∈ a.support → Commute (f (b x)) (g <| Multiplicative.ofAdd y)) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g (a * b) = liftNC (f : k →+ R) g a * liftNC (f : k →+ R) g b :=
(MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_mul f g _ _ @h_comm : _)
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_nc_mul AddMonoidAlgebra.liftNC_mul
end Mul
section One
variable [Semiring k] [Zero G] [NonAssocSemiring R]
/-- The unit of the multiplication is `single 0 1`, i.e. the function
that is `1` at `0` and zero elsewhere. -/
instance one : One k[G] :=
⟨single 0 1⟩
#align add_monoid_algebra.has_one AddMonoidAlgebra.one
theorem one_def : (1 : k[G]) = single 0 1 :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.one_def AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_one {g_hom : Type*}
[FunLike g_hom (Multiplicative G) R] [OneHomClass g_hom (Multiplicative G) R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) : liftNC (f : k →+ R) g 1 = 1 :=
(MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_one f g : _)
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_nc_one AddMonoidAlgebra.liftNC_one
end One
section Semigroup
variable [Semiring k] [AddSemigroup G]
instance nonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
mul_assoc := fun f g h => by
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp only [mul_def]
rw [sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₁ b₁
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₂ b₂
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_single_index]; congr; ext a₃ b₃
rw [sum_single_index, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
all_goals simp only [single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, add_mul,
mul_add, zero_mul, mul_zero, sum_zero, sum_add] }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_semiring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring
end Semigroup
section MulOneClass
variable [Semiring k] [AddZeroClass G]
instance nonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
natCast := fun n => single 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ := fun _ => by simp; rfl
one_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, zero_mul, single_zero, sum_zero, zero_add,
one_mul, sum_single]
mul_one := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, mul_zero, single_zero, sum_zero, add_zero,
mul_one, sum_single] }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_assoc_semiring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring
theorem natCast_def (n : ℕ) : (n : k[G]) = single (0 : G) (n : k) :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.nat_cast_def AddMonoidAlgebra.natCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_def := natCast_def
end MulOneClass
/-! #### Semiring structure -/
section Semiring
instance smulZeroClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] : SMulZeroClass R k[G] :=
Finsupp.smulZeroClass
#align add_monoid_algebra.smul_zero_class AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
variable [Semiring k] [AddMonoid G]
instance semiring : Semiring k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring,
AddMonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with }
#align add_monoid_algebra.semiring AddMonoidAlgebra.semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `liftNC` as a `RingHom`, for when `f` and `g` commute -/
def liftNCRingHom (f : k →+* R) (g : Multiplicative G →* R) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
k[G] →+* R :=
{ liftNC (f : k →+ R) g with
map_one' := liftNC_one _ _
map_mul' := fun _a _b => liftNC_mul _ _ _ _ fun {_ _} _ => h_comm _ _ }
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_nc_ring_hom AddMonoidAlgebra.liftNCRingHom
end Semiring
instance nonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring k] [AddCommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommSemiring k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with
mul_comm := @mul_comm (MonoidAlgebra k <| Multiplicative G) _ }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_semiring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring
instance nontrivial [Semiring k] [Nontrivial k] [Nonempty G] : Nontrivial k[G] :=
Finsupp.instNontrivial
#align add_monoid_algebra.nontrivial AddMonoidAlgebra.nontrivial
/-! #### Derived instances -/
section DerivedInstances
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring k] [AddCommMonoid G] : CommSemiring k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, AddMonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align add_monoid_algebra.comm_semiring AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance unique [Semiring k] [Subsingleton k] : Unique k[G] :=
Finsupp.uniqueOfRight
#align add_monoid_algebra.unique AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
instance addCommGroup [Ring k] : AddCommGroup k[G] :=
Finsupp.instAddCommGroup
#align add_monoid_algebra.add_comm_group AddMonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup
instance nonUnitalNonAssocRing [Ring k] [Add G] : NonUnitalNonAssocRing k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_ring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocRing
instance nonUnitalRing [Ring k] [AddSemigroup G] : NonUnitalRing k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_ring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing
instance nonAssocRing [Ring k] [AddZeroClass G] : NonAssocRing k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup,
AddMonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with
intCast := fun z => single 0 (z : k)
-- Porting note: Both were `simpa`.
intCast_ofNat := fun n => by simp; rfl
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by simp; rfl }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_assoc_ring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing
theorem intCast_def [Ring k] [AddZeroClass G] (z : ℤ) :
(z : k[G]) = single (0 : G) (z : k) :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.int_cast_def AddMonoidAlgebra.intCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_def := intCast_def
instance ring [Ring k] [AddMonoid G] : Ring k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing, AddMonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align add_monoid_algebra.ring AddMonoidAlgebra.ring
instance nonUnitalCommRing [CommRing k] [AddCommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommRing k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing with }
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_ring AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing
instance commRing [CommRing k] [AddCommMonoid G] : CommRing k[G] :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing, AddMonoidAlgebra.ring with }
#align add_monoid_algebra.comm_ring AddMonoidAlgebra.commRing
variable {S : Type*}
instance distribSMul [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] : DistribSMul R k[G] :=
Finsupp.distribSMul G k
#align add_monoid_algebra.distrib_smul AddMonoidAlgebra.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction [Monoid R] [Semiring k] [DistribMulAction R k] :
DistribMulAction R k[G] :=
Finsupp.distribMulAction G k
#align add_monoid_algebra.distrib_mul_action AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance faithfulSMul [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [FaithfulSMul R k] [Nonempty G] :
FaithfulSMul R k[G] :=
Finsupp.faithfulSMul
#align add_monoid_algebra.faithful_smul AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [Semiring k] [Module R k] : Module R k[G] :=
Finsupp.module G k
#align add_monoid_algebra.module AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S k] : IsScalarTower R S k[G] :=
Finsupp.isScalarTower G k
#align add_monoid_algebra.is_scalar_tower AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMulCommClass R S k] :
SMulCommClass R S k[G] :=
Finsupp.smulCommClass G k
#align add_monoid_algebra.smul_comm_tower AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ k]
[IsCentralScalar R k] : IsCentralScalar R k[G] :=
Finsupp.isCentralScalar G k
#align add_monoid_algebra.is_central_scalar AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
/-! It is hard to state the equivalent of `DistribMulAction G k[G]`
because we've never discussed actions of additive groups. -/
end DerivedInstances
section MiscTheorems
variable [Semiring k]
theorem mul_apply [DecidableEq G] [Add G] (f g : k[G]) (x : G) :
(f * g) x = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => if a₁ + a₂ = x then b₁ * b₂ else 0 :=
@MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.mul_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply
theorem mul_apply_antidiagonal [Add G] (f g : k[G]) (x : G) (s : Finset (G × G))
(hs : ∀ {p : G × G}, p ∈ s ↔ p.1 + p.2 = x) : (f * g) x = ∑ p ∈ s, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
@MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ s @hs
#align add_monoid_algebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal
theorem single_mul_single [Add G] {a₁ a₂ : G} {b₁ b₂ : k} :
single a₁ b₁ * single a₂ b₂ = single (a₁ + a₂) (b₁ * b₂) :=
@MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_mul_single AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
theorem single_commute_single [Add G] {a₁ a₂ : G} {b₁ b₂ : k}
(ha : AddCommute a₁ a₂) (hb : Commute b₁ b₂) :
Commute (single a₁ b₁) (single a₂ b₂) :=
@MonoidAlgebra.single_commute_single k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ ha hb
-- This should be a `@[simp]` lemma, but the simp_nf linter times out if we add this.
-- Probably the correct fix is to make a `[Add]MonoidAlgebra.single` with the correct type,
-- instead of relying on `Finsupp.single`.
theorem single_pow [AddMonoid G] {a : G} {b : k} : ∀ n : ℕ, single a b ^ n = single (n • a) (b ^ n)
| 0 => by
simp only [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]
rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, single_pow n, single_mul_single, add_nsmul, one_nsmul]
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_pow AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow
/-- Like `Finsupp.mapDomain_zero`, but for the `1` we define in this file -/
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_one {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} [Semiring β] [Zero α] [Zero α₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F α α₂] [ZeroHomClass F α α₂] (f : F) :
(mapDomain f (1 : AddMonoidAlgebra β α) : AddMonoidAlgebra β α₂) =
(1 : AddMonoidAlgebra β α₂) := by
simp_rw [one_def, mapDomain_single, map_zero]
#align add_monoid_algebra.map_domain_one AddMonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_one
/-- Like `Finsupp.mapDomain_add`, but for the convolutive multiplication we define in this file -/
theorem mapDomain_mul {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} [Semiring β] [Add α] [Add α₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F α α₂] [AddHomClass F α α₂] (f : F) (x y : AddMonoidAlgebra β α) :
mapDomain f (x * y) = mapDomain f x * mapDomain f y := by
simp_rw [mul_def, mapDomain_sum, mapDomain_single, map_add]
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
· congr
ext a b
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
· simp
· simp [mul_add]
· simp
· simp [add_mul]
#align add_monoid_algebra.map_domain_mul AddMonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_mul
section
variable (k G)
/-- The embedding of an additive magma into its additive magma algebra. -/
@[simps]
def ofMagma [Add G] : Multiplicative G →ₙ* k[G] where
toFun a := single a 1
map_mul' a b := by simp only [mul_def, mul_one, sum_single_index, single_eq_zero, mul_zero]; rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.of_magma AddMonoidAlgebra.ofMagma
#align add_monoid_algebra.of_magma_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.ofMagma_apply
/-- Embedding of a magma with zero into its magma algebra. -/
def of [AddZeroClass G] : Multiplicative G →* k[G] :=
{ ofMagma k G with
toFun := fun a => single a 1
map_one' := rfl }
#align add_monoid_algebra.of AddMonoidAlgebra.of
/-- Embedding of a magma with zero `G`, into its magma algebra, having `G` as source. -/
def of' : G → k[G] := fun a => single a 1
#align add_monoid_algebra.of' AddMonoidAlgebra.of'
end
@[simp]
theorem of_apply [AddZeroClass G] (a : Multiplicative G) :
of k G a = single (Multiplicative.toAdd a) 1 :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.of_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.of_apply
@[simp]
theorem of'_apply (a : G) : of' k G a = single a 1 :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.of'_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_apply
theorem of'_eq_of [AddZeroClass G] (a : G) : of' k G a = of k G (.ofAdd a) := rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.of'_eq_of AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_eq_of
theorem of_injective [Nontrivial k] [AddZeroClass G] : Function.Injective (of k G) :=
MonoidAlgebra.of_injective
#align add_monoid_algebra.of_injective AddMonoidAlgebra.of_injective
theorem of'_commute [Semiring k] [AddZeroClass G] {a : G} (h : ∀ a', AddCommute a a')
(f : AddMonoidAlgebra k G) :
Commute (of' k G a) f :=
MonoidAlgebra.of_commute (G := Multiplicative G) h f
/-- `Finsupp.single` as a `MonoidHom` from the product type into the additive monoid algebra.
Note the order of the elements of the product are reversed compared to the arguments of
`Finsupp.single`.
-/
@[simps]
def singleHom [AddZeroClass G] : k × Multiplicative G →* k[G] where
toFun a := single (Multiplicative.toAdd a.2) a.1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _a _b := single_mul_single.symm
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_hom AddMonoidAlgebra.singleHom
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_hom_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.singleHom_apply
theorem mul_single_apply_aux [Add G] (f : k[G]) (r : k) (x y z : G)
(H : ∀ a, a + x = z ↔ a = y) : (f * single x r) z = f y * r :=
@MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H
#align add_monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply_aux AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux
theorem mul_single_zero_apply [AddZeroClass G] (f : k[G]) (r : k) (x : G) :
(f * single (0 : G) r) x = f x * r :=
f.mul_single_apply_aux r _ _ _ fun a => by rw [add_zero]
#align add_monoid_algebra.mul_single_zero_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_zero_apply
theorem mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_add [Add G] (r : k) {g g' : G} (x : k[G])
(h : ¬∃ d, g' = d + g) : (x * single g r) g' = 0 :=
@MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_mul k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align add_monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_add AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_add
theorem single_mul_apply_aux [Add G] (f : k[G]) (r : k) (x y z : G)
(H : ∀ a, x + a = y ↔ a = z) : (single x r * f) y = r * f z :=
@MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply_aux AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux
theorem single_zero_mul_apply [AddZeroClass G] (f : k[G]) (r : k) (x : G) :
(single (0 : G) r * f) x = r * f x :=
f.single_mul_apply_aux r _ _ _ fun a => by rw [zero_add]
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_zero_mul_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.single_zero_mul_apply
theorem single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_add [Add G] (r : k) {g g' : G} (x : k[G])
(h : ¬∃ d, g' = g + d) : (single g r * x) g' = 0 :=
@MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_mul k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_add AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_add
theorem mul_single_apply [AddGroup G] (f : k[G]) (r : k) (x y : G) :
(f * single x r) y = f (y - x) * r :=
(sub_eq_add_neg y x).symm ▸ @MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply
theorem single_mul_apply [AddGroup G] (r : k) (x : G) (f : k[G]) (y : G) :
(single x r * f) y = r * f (-x + y) :=
@MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply
theorem liftNC_smul {R : Type*} [AddZeroClass G] [Semiring R] (f : k →+* R)
(g : Multiplicative G →* R) (c : k) (φ : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g (c • φ) = f c * liftNC (f : k →+ R) g φ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_smul k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ f g c φ
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_nc_smul AddMonoidAlgebra.liftNC_smul
theorem induction_on [AddMonoid G] {p : k[G] → Prop} (f : k[G])
(hM : ∀ g, p (of k G (Multiplicative.ofAdd g)))
(hadd : ∀ f g : k[G], p f → p g → p (f + g))
(hsmul : ∀ (r : k) (f), p f → p (r • f)) : p f := by
refine Finsupp.induction_linear f ?_ (fun f g hf hg => hadd f g hf hg) fun g r => ?_
· simpa using hsmul 0 (of k G (Multiplicative.ofAdd 0)) (hM 0)
· convert hsmul r (of k G (Multiplicative.ofAdd g)) (hM g)
-- Porting note: Was `simp only`.
rw [of_apply, toAdd_ofAdd, smul_single', mul_one]
#align add_monoid_algebra.induction_on AddMonoidAlgebra.induction_on
/-- If `f : G → H` is an additive homomorphism between two additive monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a ring homomorphism between their add monoid algebras. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainRingHom (k : Type*) [Semiring k] {H F : Type*} [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H]
[FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) : k[G] →+* k[H] :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra k G →+ MonoidAlgebra k H) with
map_one' := mapDomain_one f
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y }
#align add_monoid_algebra.map_domain_ring_hom AddMonoidAlgebra.mapDomainRingHom
#align add_monoid_algebra.map_domain_ring_hom_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.mapDomainRingHom_apply
end MiscTheorems
end AddMonoidAlgebra
/-!
#### Conversions between `AddMonoidAlgebra` and `MonoidAlgebra`
We have not defined `k[G] = MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G)`
because historically this caused problems;
since the changes that have made `nsmul` definitional, this would be possible,
but for now we just construct the ring isomorphisms using `RingEquiv.refl _`.
-/
/-- The equivalence between `AddMonoidAlgebra` and `MonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Multiplicative` -/
protected def AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative [Semiring k] [Add G] :
AddMonoidAlgebra k G ≃+* MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G) :=
{ Finsupp.domCongr
Multiplicative.ofAdd with
toFun := equivMapDomain Multiplicative.ofAdd
map_mul' := fun x y => by
-- Porting note: added `dsimp only`; `beta_reduce` alone is not sufficient
dsimp only
repeat' rw [equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain (M := k)]
dsimp [Multiplicative.ofAdd]
exact MonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_mul (α := Multiplicative G) (β := k)
(MulHom.id (Multiplicative G)) x y }
#align add_monoid_algebra.to_multiplicative AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative
/-- The equivalence between `MonoidAlgebra` and `AddMonoidAlgebra` in terms of `Additive` -/
protected def MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive [Semiring k] [Mul G] :
MonoidAlgebra k G ≃+* AddMonoidAlgebra k (Additive G) :=
{ Finsupp.domCongr Additive.ofMul with
toFun := equivMapDomain Additive.ofMul
map_mul' := fun x y => by
-- Porting note: added `dsimp only`; `beta_reduce` alone is not sufficient
dsimp only
repeat' rw [equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain (M := k)]
dsimp [Additive.ofMul]
convert MonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_mul (β := k) (MulHom.id G) x y }
#align monoid_algebra.to_additive MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {k G H}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Add G]
instance isScalarTower_self [IsScalarTower R k k] :
IsScalarTower R k[G] k[G] :=
@MonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self k (Multiplicative G) R _ _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.is_scalar_tower_self AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self
/-- Note that if `k` is a `CommSemiring` then we have `SMulCommClass k k k` and so we can take
`R = k` in the below. In other words, if the coefficients are commutative amongst themselves, they
also commute with the algebra multiplication. -/
instance smulCommClass_self [SMulCommClass R k k] :
SMulCommClass R k[G] k[G] :=
@MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self k (Multiplicative G) R _ _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.smul_comm_class_self AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self
instance smulCommClass_symm_self [SMulCommClass k R k] :
SMulCommClass k[G] R k[G] :=
@MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_symm_self k (Multiplicative G) R _ _ _ _
#align add_monoid_algebra.smul_comm_class_symm_self AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_symm_self
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_alg_hom_ext AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
#align add_monoid_algebra.non_unital_alg_hom_ext' AddMonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext'
/-- The functor `G ↦ k[G]`, from the category of magmas to the category of
non-unital, non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other
direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A) :=
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k : (Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (_ →ₙₐ[k] A)) with
toFun := fun f =>
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k f : _) with
toFun := fun a => sum a fun m t => t • f (Multiplicative.ofAdd m) }
invFun := fun F => F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) }
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_magma AddMonoidAlgebra.liftMagma
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_magma_apply_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.liftMagma_apply_apply
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_magma_symm_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.liftMagma_symm_apply
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
/-- `Finsupp.single 0` as a `RingHom` -/
@[simps]
def singleZeroRingHom [Semiring k] [AddMonoid G] : k →+* k[G] :=
{ Finsupp.singleAddHom 0 with
map_one' := rfl
-- Porting note (#10691): Was `rw`.
map_mul' := fun x y => by simp only [singleAddHom, single_mul_single, zero_add] }
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_zero_ring_hom AddMonoidAlgebra.singleZeroRingHom
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_zero_ring_hom_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.singleZeroRingHom_apply
/-- If two ring homomorphisms from `k[G]` are equal on all `single a 1`
and `single 0 b`, then they are equal. -/
theorem ringHom_ext {R} [Semiring k] [AddMonoid G] [Semiring R] {f g : k[G] →+* R}
(h₀ : ∀ b, f (single 0 b) = g (single 0 b)) (h_of : ∀ a, f (single a 1) = g (single a 1)) :
f = g :=
@MonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) R _ _ _ _ _ h₀ h_of
#align add_monoid_algebra.ring_hom_ext AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext
/-- If two ring homomorphisms from `k[G]` are equal on all `single a 1`
and `single 0 b`, then they are equal.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem ringHom_ext' {R} [Semiring k] [AddMonoid G] [Semiring R] {f g : k[G] →+* R}
(h₁ : f.comp singleZeroRingHom = g.comp singleZeroRingHom)
(h_of : (f : k[G] →* R).comp (of k G) = (g : k[G] →* R).comp (of k G)) :
f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.congr_fun h₁) (DFunLike.congr_fun h_of)
#align add_monoid_algebra.ring_hom_ext' AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext'
section Opposite
open Finsupp MulOpposite
variable [Semiring k]
/-- The opposite of an `R[I]` is ring equivalent to
the `AddMonoidAlgebra Rᵐᵒᵖ I` over the opposite ring, taking elements to their opposite. -/
@[simps! (config := { simpRhs := true }) apply symm_apply]
protected noncomputable def opRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid G] :
k[G]ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* kᵐᵒᵖ[G] :=
{ MulOpposite.opAddEquiv.symm.trans
(Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv (MulOpposite.opAddEquiv : k ≃+ kᵐᵒᵖ)) with
map_mul' := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, AddEquiv.toEquiv_eq_coe]; erw [AddEquiv.coe_toEquiv]
rw [← AddEquiv.coe_toAddMonoidHom]
refine Iff.mpr (AddMonoidHom.map_mul_iff (R := k[G]ᵐᵒᵖ) (S := kᵐᵒᵖ[G]) _) ?_
-- Porting note: Was `ext`.
refine AddMonoidHom.mul_op_ext _ _ <| addHom_ext' fun i₁ => AddMonoidHom.ext fun r₁ =>
AddMonoidHom.mul_op_ext _ _ <| addHom_ext' fun i₂ => AddMonoidHom.ext fun r₂ => ?_
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
dsimp
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [AddEquiv.trans_apply, AddEquiv.trans_apply, AddEquiv.trans_apply,
MulOpposite.opAddEquiv_symm_apply]; rw [MulOpposite.unop_mul (α := k[G])]
dsimp
-- This was not needed before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [mapRange_single, single_mul_single, mapRange_single, mapRange_single]
simp only [mapRange_single, single_mul_single, ← op_mul, add_comm] }
#align add_monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv
#align add_monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_apply
#align add_monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_symm_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_symm_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem opRingEquiv_single [AddCommMonoid G] (r : k) (x : G) :
AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv (op (single x r)) = single x (op r) := by simp
#align add_monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_single AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_single
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_single [AddCommMonoid G] (r : kᵐᵒᵖ) (x : Gᵐᵒᵖ) :
AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv.symm (single x r) = op (single x r.unop) := by simp
#align add_monoid_algebra.op_ring_equiv_symm_single AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_symm_single
end Opposite
/-- The instance `Algebra R k[G]` whenever we have `Algebra R k`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k k[G]`.
-/
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
Algebra R k[G] :=
{ singleZeroRingHom.comp (algebraMap R k) with
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
smul_def' := fun r a => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
-- Porting note: Newly required.
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, mul_single_zero_apply, Algebra.commutes] }
#align add_monoid_algebra.algebra AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
/-- `Finsupp.single 0` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] : k →ₐ[R] k[G] :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp
rfl }
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_zero_alg_hom AddMonoidAlgebra.singleZeroAlgHom
#align add_monoid_algebra.single_zero_alg_hom_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.singleZeroAlgHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
(algebraMap R k[G] : R → k[G]) = single 0 ∘ algebraMap R k :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.coe_algebra_map AddMonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : Multiplicative G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_nc_alg_hom AddMonoidAlgebra.liftNCAlgHom
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align add_monoid_algebra.alg_hom_ext AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : (φ₁ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
#align add_monoid_algebra.alg_hom_ext' AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext'
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`k[G] →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (Multiplicative G →* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :=
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ with
invFun := fun f => (f : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun := fun F =>
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ F with
toFun := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _ } }
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift AddMonoidAlgebra.lift
variable {k G A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_apply' AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_apply'
theorem lift_apply (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) := by
simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_apply
theorem lift_def (F : Multiplicative G →* A) :
⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_def AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_def
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single (Multiplicative.toAdd x) 1) :=
rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_symm_apply AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_symm_apply
theorem lift_of (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := MonoidAlgebra.lift_of F x
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_of AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_of
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (a b) :
lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
MonoidAlgebra.lift_single F (.ofAdd a) b
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_single AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_single
lemma lift_of' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : G) :
lift k G A F (of' k G x) = F (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) :=
lift_of F x
theorem lift_unique' (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_unique' AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_unique'
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
#align add_monoid_algebra.lift_unique AddMonoidAlgebra.lift_unique
theorem algHom_ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A} :
(∀ x, φ₁ (Finsupp.single x 1) = φ₂ (Finsupp.single x 1)) ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ :=
⟨fun h => algHom_ext h, by rintro rfl _; rfl⟩
#align add_monoid_algebra.alg_hom_ext_iff AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext_iff
end lift
section
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
universe ui
variable {ι : Type ui}
theorem prod_single [CommSemiring k] [AddCommMonoid G] {s : Finset ι} {a : ι → G} {b : ι → k} :
(∏ i ∈ s, single (a i) (b i)) = single (∑ i ∈ s, a i) (∏ i ∈ s, b i) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s rfl fun a s has ih => by
rw [prod_cons has, ih, single_mul_single, sum_cons has, prod_cons has]
#align add_monoid_algebra.prod_single AddMonoidAlgebra.prod_single
end
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 2,100 | 2,104 | theorem mapDomain_algebraMap (A : Type*) {H F : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k A[G] r) = algebraMap k A[H] r := by |
simp only [Function.comp_apply, mapDomain_single, AddMonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap, map_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
#align_import data.complex.exponential from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a8b2226cfb0a79f5986492053fc49b1a0c6aeffb"
/-!
# Exponential, trigonometric and hyperbolic trigonometric functions
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential, sine, cosine, tangent,
hyperbolic sine, hyperbolic cosine, and hyperbolic tangent functions.
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped Classical ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_abs_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq _root_.abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, abs (z ^ m / m.factorial) :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt (abs z)
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (abs.nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (abs z / n) (div_nonneg (abs.nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_abs, abs_abs, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul, ← div_div,
mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
#align complex.is_cau_abs_exp Complex.isCauSeq_abs_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_abs_exp z).of_abv
#align complex.is_cau_exp Complex.isCauSeq_exp
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ Complex.abs :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
#align complex.exp' Complex.exp'
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
-- Porting note: removed `irreducible` attribute, so I can prove things
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
#align complex.exp Complex.exp
/-- The complex sine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def sin (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
#align complex.sin Complex.sin
/-- The complex cosine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def cos (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
#align complex.cos Complex.cos
/-- The complex tangent function, defined as `sin z / cos z` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def tan (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
sin z / cos z
#align complex.tan Complex.tan
/-- The complex cotangent function, defined as `cos z / sin z` -/
def cot (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cos z / sin z
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def sinh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
#align complex.sinh Complex.sinh
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function, defined via `exp` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def cosh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
(exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
#align complex.cosh Complex.cosh
/-- The complex hyperbolic tangent function, defined as `sinh z / cosh z` -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
def tanh (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
sinh z / cosh z
#align complex.tanh Complex.tanh
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
#align real.exp Real.exp
/-- The real sine function, defined as the real part of the complex sine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def sin (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(sin x).re
#align real.sin Real.sin
/-- The real cosine function, defined as the real part of the complex cosine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def cos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cos x).re
#align real.cos Real.cos
/-- The real tangent function, defined as the real part of the complex tangent -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def tan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(tan x).re
#align real.tan Real.tan
/-- The real cotangent function, defined as the real part of the complex cotangent -/
nonrec def cot (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cot x).re
/-- The real hypebolic sine function, defined as the real part of the complex hyperbolic sine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def sinh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(sinh x).re
#align real.sinh Real.sinh
/-- The real hypebolic cosine function, defined as the real part of the complex hyperbolic cosine -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def cosh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(cosh x).re
#align real.cosh Real.cosh
/-- The real hypebolic tangent function, defined as the real part of
the complex hyperbolic tangent -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed `@[pp_nodot]`
nonrec def tanh (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(tanh x).re
#align real.tanh Real.tanh
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- Porting note: ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
cases' j with j j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
#align complex.exp_zero Complex.exp_zero
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_abs_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
#align complex.exp_add Complex.exp_add
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp (Multiplicative.toAdd z),
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
#align complex.exp_list_sum Complex.exp_list_sum
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
#align complex.exp_multiset_sum Complex.exp_multiset_sum
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
#align complex.exp_sum Complex.exp_sum
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
#align complex.exp_nat_mul Complex.exp_nat_mul
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_self x, exp_add, h]; simp
#align complex.exp_ne_zero Complex.exp_ne_zero
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel (exp_ne_zero x)]
#align complex.exp_neg Complex.exp_neg
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align complex.exp_sub Complex.exp_sub
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
#align complex.exp_int_mul Complex.exp_int_mul
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.exp_conj Complex.exp_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_exp_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_exp_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_exp Complex.ofReal_exp
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.exp_of_real_im Complex.exp_ofReal_im
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
#align complex.exp_of_real_re Complex.exp_ofReal_re
theorem two_sinh : 2 * sinh x = exp x - exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_sinh Complex.two_sinh
theorem two_cosh : 2 * cosh x = exp x + exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_cosh Complex.two_cosh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_zero : sinh 0 = 0 := by simp [sinh]
#align complex.sinh_zero Complex.sinh_zero
@[simp]
theorem sinh_neg : sinh (-x) = -sinh x := by simp [sinh, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
#align complex.sinh_neg Complex.sinh_neg
private theorem sinh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a - b) * (c + d) + (a + b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c - b * d) := by ring
theorem sinh_add : sinh (x + y) = sinh x * cosh y + cosh x * sinh y := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_sinh, exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm, mul_add, ←
mul_assoc, two_sinh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh, ← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_cosh]
exact sinh_add_aux
#align complex.sinh_add Complex.sinh_add
@[simp]
theorem cosh_zero : cosh 0 = 1 := by simp [cosh]
#align complex.cosh_zero Complex.cosh_zero
@[simp]
theorem cosh_neg : cosh (-x) = cosh x := by simp [add_comm, cosh, exp_neg]
#align complex.cosh_neg Complex.cosh_neg
private theorem cosh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) + (a - b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
theorem cosh_add : cosh (x + y) = cosh x * cosh y + sinh x * sinh y := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_cosh, exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm, mul_add, ←
mul_assoc, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_sinh, ← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh]
exact cosh_add_aux
#align complex.cosh_add Complex.cosh_add
theorem sinh_sub : sinh (x - y) = sinh x * cosh y - cosh x * sinh y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sinh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.sinh_sub Complex.sinh_sub
theorem cosh_sub : cosh (x - y) = cosh x * cosh y - sinh x * sinh y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cosh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.cosh_sub Complex.cosh_sub
theorem sinh_conj : sinh (conj x) = conj (sinh x) := by
rw [sinh, ← RingHom.map_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← RingHom.map_sub, sinh, map_div₀]
-- Porting note: not nice
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align complex.sinh_conj Complex.sinh_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((sinh x).re : ℂ) = sinh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← sinh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_sinh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sinh (x : ℝ) : (Real.sinh x : ℂ) = sinh x :=
ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_sinh Complex.ofReal_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sinh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.sinh_of_real_im Complex.sinh_ofReal_im
theorem sinh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).re = Real.sinh x :=
rfl
#align complex.sinh_of_real_re Complex.sinh_ofReal_re
theorem cosh_conj : cosh (conj x) = conj (cosh x) := by
rw [cosh, ← RingHom.map_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← RingHom.map_add, cosh, map_div₀]
-- Porting note: not nice
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align complex.cosh_conj Complex.cosh_conj
theorem ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((cosh x).re : ℂ) = cosh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← cosh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_cosh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_cosh (x : ℝ) : (Real.cosh x : ℂ) = cosh x :=
ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_cosh Complex.ofReal_cosh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_cosh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.cosh_of_real_im Complex.cosh_ofReal_im
@[simp]
theorem cosh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).re = Real.cosh x :=
rfl
#align complex.cosh_of_real_re Complex.cosh_ofReal_re
theorem tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh : tanh x = sinh x / cosh x :=
rfl
#align complex.tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh Complex.tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh
@[simp]
theorem tanh_zero : tanh 0 = 0 := by simp [tanh]
#align complex.tanh_zero Complex.tanh_zero
@[simp]
theorem tanh_neg : tanh (-x) = -tanh x := by simp [tanh, neg_div]
#align complex.tanh_neg Complex.tanh_neg
theorem tanh_conj : tanh (conj x) = conj (tanh x) := by
rw [tanh, sinh_conj, cosh_conj, ← map_div₀, tanh]
#align complex.tanh_conj Complex.tanh_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((tanh x).re : ℂ) = tanh x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← tanh_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_tanh_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_tanh (x : ℝ) : (Real.tanh x : ℂ) = tanh x :=
ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_tanh Complex.ofReal_tanh
@[simp]
theorem tanh_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_tanh_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.tanh_of_real_im Complex.tanh_ofReal_im
theorem tanh_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).re = Real.tanh x :=
rfl
#align complex.tanh_of_real_re Complex.tanh_ofReal_re
@[simp]
theorem cosh_add_sinh : cosh x + sinh x = exp x := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_add, two_cosh, two_sinh, add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
#align complex.cosh_add_sinh Complex.cosh_add_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_add_cosh : sinh x + cosh x = exp x := by rw [add_comm, cosh_add_sinh]
#align complex.sinh_add_cosh Complex.sinh_add_cosh
@[simp]
theorem exp_sub_cosh : exp x - cosh x = sinh x :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (sinh_add_cosh x).symm
#align complex.exp_sub_cosh Complex.exp_sub_cosh
@[simp]
theorem exp_sub_sinh : exp x - sinh x = cosh x :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (cosh_add_sinh x).symm
#align complex.exp_sub_sinh Complex.exp_sub_sinh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_sub_sinh : cosh x - sinh x = exp (-x) := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_sub, two_cosh, two_sinh, add_sub_sub_cancel, two_mul]
#align complex.cosh_sub_sinh Complex.cosh_sub_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_sub_cosh : sinh x - cosh x = -exp (-x) := by rw [← neg_sub, cosh_sub_sinh]
#align complex.sinh_sub_cosh Complex.sinh_sub_cosh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq : cosh x ^ 2 - sinh x ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [sq_sub_sq, cosh_add_sinh, cosh_sub_sinh, ← exp_add, add_neg_self, exp_zero]
#align complex.cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq Complex.cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq
theorem cosh_sq : cosh x ^ 2 = sinh x ^ 2 + 1 := by
rw [← cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq x]
ring
#align complex.cosh_sq Complex.cosh_sq
theorem sinh_sq : sinh x ^ 2 = cosh x ^ 2 - 1 := by
rw [← cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq x]
ring
#align complex.sinh_sq Complex.sinh_sq
theorem cosh_two_mul : cosh (2 * x) = cosh x ^ 2 + sinh x ^ 2 := by rw [two_mul, cosh_add, sq, sq]
#align complex.cosh_two_mul Complex.cosh_two_mul
theorem sinh_two_mul : sinh (2 * x) = 2 * sinh x * cosh x := by
rw [two_mul, sinh_add]
ring
#align complex.sinh_two_mul Complex.sinh_two_mul
theorem cosh_three_mul : cosh (3 * x) = 4 * cosh x ^ 3 - 3 * cosh x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, cosh_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cosh_two_mul, sinh_two_mul]
have h2 : sinh x * (2 * sinh x * cosh x) = 2 * cosh x * sinh x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, sinh_sq]
ring
#align complex.cosh_three_mul Complex.cosh_three_mul
theorem sinh_three_mul : sinh (3 * x) = 4 * sinh x ^ 3 + 3 * sinh x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, sinh_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cosh_two_mul, sinh_two_mul]
have h2 : cosh x * (2 * sinh x * cosh x) = 2 * sinh x * cosh x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, cosh_sq]
ring
#align complex.sinh_three_mul Complex.sinh_three_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin 0 = 0 := by simp [sin]
#align complex.sin_zero Complex.sin_zero
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg : sin (-x) = -sin x := by
simp [sin, sub_eq_add_neg, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
#align complex.sin_neg Complex.sin_neg
theorem two_sin : 2 * sin x = (exp (-x * I) - exp (x * I)) * I :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_sin Complex.two_sin
theorem two_cos : 2 * cos x = exp (x * I) + exp (-x * I) :=
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero
#align complex.two_cos Complex.two_cos
theorem sinh_mul_I : sinh (x * I) = sin x * I := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_sinh, ← mul_assoc, two_sin, mul_assoc, I_mul_I,
mul_neg_one, neg_sub, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sinh_mul_I Complex.sinh_mul_I
theorem cosh_mul_I : cosh (x * I) = cos x := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℂ), two_cosh, two_cos, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cosh_mul_I Complex.cosh_mul_I
theorem tanh_mul_I : tanh (x * I) = tan x * I := by
rw [tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh, cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_div_right_comm, tan]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.tanh_mul_I Complex.tanh_mul_I
theorem cos_mul_I : cos (x * I) = cosh x := by rw [← cosh_mul_I]; ring_nf; simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_mul_I Complex.cos_mul_I
theorem sin_mul_I : sin (x * I) = sinh x * I := by
have h : I * sin (x * I) = -sinh x := by
rw [mul_comm, ← sinh_mul_I]
ring_nf
simp
rw [← neg_neg (sinh x), ← h]
apply Complex.ext <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sin_mul_I Complex.sin_mul_I
theorem tan_mul_I : tan (x * I) = tanh x * I := by
rw [tan, sin_mul_I, cos_mul_I, mul_div_right_comm, tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.tan_mul_I Complex.tan_mul_I
theorem sin_add : sin (x + y) = sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y := by
rw [← mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I, add_mul, add_mul, mul_right_comm, ← sinh_mul_I,
mul_assoc, ← sinh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, sinh_add]
#align complex.sin_add Complex.sin_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos 0 = 1 := by simp [cos]
#align complex.cos_zero Complex.cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg : cos (-x) = cos x := by simp [cos, sub_eq_add_neg, exp_neg, add_comm]
#align complex.cos_neg Complex.cos_neg
private theorem cos_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) - (b - a) * (d - c) * -1 = 2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
theorem cos_add : cos (x + y) = cos x * cos y - sin x * sin y := by
rw [← cosh_mul_I, add_mul, cosh_add, cosh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I,
mul_mul_mul_comm, I_mul_I, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.cos_add Complex.cos_add
theorem sin_sub : sin (x - y) = sin x * cos y - cos x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align complex.sin_sub Complex.sin_sub
theorem cos_sub : cos (x - y) = cos x * cos y + sin x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align complex.cos_sub Complex.cos_sub
theorem sin_add_mul_I (x y : ℂ) : sin (x + y * I) = sin x * cosh y + cos x * sinh y * I := by
rw [sin_add, cos_mul_I, sin_mul_I, mul_assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.sin_add_mul_I Complex.sin_add_mul_I
theorem sin_eq (z : ℂ) : sin z = sin z.re * cosh z.im + cos z.re * sinh z.im * I := by
convert sin_add_mul_I z.re z.im; exact (re_add_im z).symm
#align complex.sin_eq Complex.sin_eq
theorem cos_add_mul_I (x y : ℂ) : cos (x + y * I) = cos x * cosh y - sin x * sinh y * I := by
rw [cos_add, cos_mul_I, sin_mul_I, mul_assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_add_mul_I Complex.cos_add_mul_I
theorem cos_eq (z : ℂ) : cos z = cos z.re * cosh z.im - sin z.re * sinh z.im * I := by
convert cos_add_mul_I z.re z.im; exact (re_add_im z).symm
#align complex.cos_eq Complex.cos_eq
theorem sin_sub_sin : sin x - sin y = 2 * sin ((x - y) / 2) * cos ((x + y) / 2) := by
have s1 := sin_add ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
have s2 := sin_sub ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel_right, half_add_self] at s1
rw [div_sub_div_same, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, half_add_self] at s2
rw [s1, s2]
ring
#align complex.sin_sub_sin Complex.sin_sub_sin
theorem cos_sub_cos : cos x - cos y = -2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) := by
have s1 := cos_add ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
have s2 := cos_sub ((x + y) / 2) ((x - y) / 2)
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel_right, half_add_self] at s1
rw [div_sub_div_same, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, half_add_self] at s2
rw [s1, s2]
ring
#align complex.cos_sub_cos Complex.cos_sub_cos
theorem sin_add_sin : sin x + sin y = 2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := by
simpa using sin_sub_sin x (-y)
theorem cos_add_cos : cos x + cos y = 2 * cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := by
calc
cos x + cos y = cos ((x + y) / 2 + (x - y) / 2) + cos ((x + y) / 2 - (x - y) / 2) := ?_
_ =
cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) - sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) +
(cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) + sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2)) :=
?_
_ = 2 * cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) := ?_
· congr <;> field_simp
· rw [cos_add, cos_sub]
ring
#align complex.cos_add_cos Complex.cos_add_cos
theorem sin_conj : sin (conj x) = conj (sin x) := by
rw [← mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I, ← conj_neg_I, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_mul,
sinh_conj, mul_neg, sinh_neg, sinh_mul_I, mul_neg]
#align complex.sin_conj Complex.sin_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_sin_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((sin x).re : ℂ) = sin x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← sin_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_sin_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_sin_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sin (x : ℝ) : (Real.sin x : ℂ) = sin x :=
ofReal_sin_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_sin Complex.ofReal_sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (sin x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sin_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.sin_of_real_im Complex.sin_ofReal_im
theorem sin_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (sin x).re = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align complex.sin_of_real_re Complex.sin_ofReal_re
theorem cos_conj : cos (conj x) = conj (cos x) := by
rw [← cosh_mul_I, ← conj_neg_I, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← cosh_mul_I, cosh_conj, mul_neg, cosh_neg]
#align complex.cos_conj Complex.cos_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_cos_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((cos x).re : ℂ) = cos x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← cos_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_cos_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_cos_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_cos (x : ℝ) : (Real.cos x : ℂ) = cos x :=
ofReal_cos_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_cos Complex.ofReal_cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (cos x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_cos_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.cos_of_real_im Complex.cos_ofReal_im
theorem cos_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (cos x).re = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align complex.cos_of_real_re Complex.cos_ofReal_re
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan 0 = 0 := by simp [tan]
#align complex.tan_zero Complex.tan_zero
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos : tan x = sin x / cos x :=
rfl
#align complex.tan_eq_sin_div_cos Complex.tan_eq_sin_div_cos
theorem tan_mul_cos {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) : tan x * cos x = sin x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hx]
#align complex.tan_mul_cos Complex.tan_mul_cos
@[simp]
theorem tan_neg : tan (-x) = -tan x := by simp [tan, neg_div]
#align complex.tan_neg Complex.tan_neg
theorem tan_conj : tan (conj x) = conj (tan x) := by rw [tan, sin_conj, cos_conj, ← map_div₀, tan]
#align complex.tan_conj Complex.tan_conj
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_tan_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((tan x).re : ℂ) = tan x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← tan_conj, conj_ofReal]
#align complex.of_real_tan_of_real_re Complex.ofReal_tan_ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_tan (x : ℝ) : (Real.tan x : ℂ) = tan x :=
ofReal_tan_ofReal_re _
#align complex.of_real_tan Complex.ofReal_tan
@[simp]
theorem tan_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (tan x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_tan_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
#align complex.tan_of_real_im Complex.tan_ofReal_im
theorem tan_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (tan x).re = Real.tan x :=
rfl
#align complex.tan_of_real_re Complex.tan_ofReal_re
theorem cos_add_sin_I : cos x + sin x * I = exp (x * I) := by
rw [← cosh_add_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_add_sin_I Complex.cos_add_sin_I
theorem cos_sub_sin_I : cos x - sin x * I = exp (-x * I) := by
rw [neg_mul, ← cosh_sub_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_sub_sin_I Complex.cos_sub_sin_I
@[simp]
theorem sin_sq_add_cos_sq : sin x ^ 2 + cos x ^ 2 = 1 :=
Eq.trans (by rw [cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_pow, I_sq, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm])
(cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq (x * I))
#align complex.sin_sq_add_cos_sq Complex.sin_sq_add_cos_sq
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq : cos x ^ 2 + sin x ^ 2 = 1 := by rw [add_comm, sin_sq_add_cos_sq]
#align complex.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Complex.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem cos_two_mul' : cos (2 * x) = cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2 := by rw [two_mul, cos_add, ← sq, ← sq]
#align complex.cos_two_mul' Complex.cos_two_mul'
theorem cos_two_mul : cos (2 * x) = 2 * cos x ^ 2 - 1 := by
rw [cos_two_mul', eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 (sin_sq_add_cos_sq x), ← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub,
two_mul]
#align complex.cos_two_mul Complex.cos_two_mul
theorem sin_two_mul : sin (2 * x) = 2 * sin x * cos x := by
rw [two_mul, sin_add, two_mul, add_mul, mul_comm]
#align complex.sin_two_mul Complex.sin_two_mul
theorem cos_sq : cos x ^ 2 = 1 / 2 + cos (2 * x) / 2 := by
simp [cos_two_mul, div_add_div_same, mul_div_cancel_left₀, two_ne_zero, -one_div]
#align complex.cos_sq Complex.cos_sq
theorem cos_sq' : cos x ^ 2 = 1 - sin x ^ 2 := by rw [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, add_sub_cancel_left]
#align complex.cos_sq' Complex.cos_sq'
theorem sin_sq : sin x ^ 2 = 1 - cos x ^ 2 := by rw [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align complex.sin_sq Complex.sin_sq
theorem inv_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) : (1 + tan x ^ 2)⁻¹ = cos x ^ 2 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, div_pow]
field_simp
#align complex.inv_one_add_tan_sq Complex.inv_one_add_tan_sq
theorem tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) :
tan x ^ 2 / (1 + tan x ^ 2) = sin x ^ 2 := by
simp only [← tan_mul_cos hx, mul_pow, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq hx, div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul]
#align complex.tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq Complex.tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq
theorem cos_three_mul : cos (3 * x) = 4 * cos x ^ 3 - 3 * cos x := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, cos_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cos_two_mul, sin_two_mul, mul_add, mul_sub, mul_one, sq]
have h2 : 4 * cos x ^ 3 = 2 * cos x * cos x * cos x + 2 * cos x * cos x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, cos_sq']
ring
#align complex.cos_three_mul Complex.cos_three_mul
theorem sin_three_mul : sin (3 * x) = 3 * sin x - 4 * sin x ^ 3 := by
have h1 : x + 2 * x = 3 * x := by ring
rw [← h1, sin_add x (2 * x)]
simp only [cos_two_mul, sin_two_mul, cos_sq']
have h2 : cos x * (2 * sin x * cos x) = 2 * sin x * cos x ^ 2 := by ring
rw [h2, cos_sq']
ring
#align complex.sin_three_mul Complex.sin_three_mul
theorem exp_mul_I : exp (x * I) = cos x + sin x * I :=
(cos_add_sin_I _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.exp_mul_I Complex.exp_mul_I
theorem exp_add_mul_I : exp (x + y * I) = exp x * (cos y + sin y * I) := by rw [exp_add, exp_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.exp_add_mul_I Complex.exp_add_mul_I
theorem exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos : exp x = exp x.re * (cos x.im + sin x.im * I) := by
rw [← exp_add_mul_I, re_add_im]
#align complex.exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos Complex.exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos
theorem exp_re : (exp x).re = Real.exp x.re * Real.cos x.im := by
rw [exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos]
simp [exp_ofReal_re, cos_ofReal_re]
#align complex.exp_re Complex.exp_re
theorem exp_im : (exp x).im = Real.exp x.re * Real.sin x.im := by
rw [exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos]
simp [exp_ofReal_re, sin_ofReal_re]
#align complex.exp_im Complex.exp_im
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_mul_I_re (x : ℝ) : (exp (x * I)).re = Real.cos x := by
simp [exp_mul_I, cos_ofReal_re]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.exp_of_real_mul_I_re Complex.exp_ofReal_mul_I_re
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_mul_I_im (x : ℝ) : (exp (x * I)).im = Real.sin x := by
simp [exp_mul_I, sin_ofReal_re]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.exp_of_real_mul_I_im Complex.exp_ofReal_mul_I_im
/-- **De Moivre's formula** -/
theorem cos_add_sin_mul_I_pow (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) :
(cos z + sin z * I) ^ n = cos (↑n * z) + sin (↑n * z) * I := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, ← exp_mul_I]
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero, Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, zero_mul, exp_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, add_mul, one_mul, exp_add]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.cos_add_sin_mul_I_pow Complex.cos_add_sin_mul_I_pow
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
#align real.exp_zero Real.exp_zero
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
#align real.exp_add Real.exp_add
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp (Multiplicative.toAdd x),
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
#align real.exp_list_sum Real.exp_list_sum
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
#align real.exp_multiset_sum Real.exp_multiset_sum
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
#align real.exp_sum Real.exp_sum
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
#align real.exp_nat_mul Real.exp_nat_mul
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
#align real.exp_ne_zero Real.exp_ne_zero
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
#align real.exp_neg Real.exp_neg
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.exp_sub Real.exp_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin 0 = 0 := by simp [sin]
#align real.sin_zero Real.sin_zero
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg : sin (-x) = -sin x := by simp [sin, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
#align real.sin_neg Real.sin_neg
nonrec theorem sin_add : sin (x + y) = sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [sin_add]
#align real.sin_add Real.sin_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos 0 = 1 := by simp [cos]
#align real.cos_zero Real.cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg : cos (-x) = cos x := by simp [cos, exp_neg]
#align real.cos_neg Real.cos_neg
@[simp]
theorem cos_abs : cos |x| = cos x := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp only [*, _root_.abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos, cos_neg]
#align real.cos_abs Real.cos_abs
nonrec theorem cos_add : cos (x + y) = cos x * cos y - sin x * sin y :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [cos_add]
#align real.cos_add Real.cos_add
theorem sin_sub : sin (x - y) = sin x * cos y - cos x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align real.sin_sub Real.sin_sub
theorem cos_sub : cos (x - y) = cos x * cos y + sin x * sin y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
#align real.cos_sub Real.cos_sub
nonrec theorem sin_sub_sin : sin x - sin y = 2 * sin ((x - y) / 2) * cos ((x + y) / 2) :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [sin_sub_sin]
#align real.sin_sub_sin Real.sin_sub_sin
nonrec theorem cos_sub_cos : cos x - cos y = -2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [cos_sub_cos]
#align real.cos_sub_cos Real.cos_sub_cos
nonrec theorem cos_add_cos : cos x + cos y = 2 * cos ((x + y) / 2) * cos ((x - y) / 2) :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [cos_add_cos]
#align real.cos_add_cos Real.cos_add_cos
nonrec theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos : tan x = sin x / cos x :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
#align real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos
theorem tan_mul_cos {x : ℝ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) : tan x * cos x = sin x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hx]
#align real.tan_mul_cos Real.tan_mul_cos
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan 0 = 0 := by simp [tan]
#align real.tan_zero Real.tan_zero
@[simp]
theorem tan_neg : tan (-x) = -tan x := by simp [tan, neg_div]
#align real.tan_neg Real.tan_neg
@[simp]
nonrec theorem sin_sq_add_cos_sq : sin x ^ 2 + cos x ^ 2 = 1 :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [sin_sq_add_cos_sq])
#align real.sin_sq_add_cos_sq Real.sin_sq_add_cos_sq
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq : cos x ^ 2 + sin x ^ 2 = 1 := by rw [add_comm, sin_sq_add_cos_sq]
#align real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_sq_le_one : sin x ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by
rw [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x]; exact le_add_of_nonneg_right (sq_nonneg _)
#align real.sin_sq_le_one Real.sin_sq_le_one
theorem cos_sq_le_one : cos x ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by
rw [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x]; exact le_add_of_nonneg_left (sq_nonneg _)
#align real.cos_sq_le_one Real.cos_sq_le_one
theorem abs_sin_le_one : |sin x| ≤ 1 :=
abs_le_one_iff_mul_self_le_one.2 <| by simp only [← sq, sin_sq_le_one]
#align real.abs_sin_le_one Real.abs_sin_le_one
theorem abs_cos_le_one : |cos x| ≤ 1 :=
abs_le_one_iff_mul_self_le_one.2 <| by simp only [← sq, cos_sq_le_one]
#align real.abs_cos_le_one Real.abs_cos_le_one
theorem sin_le_one : sin x ≤ 1 :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_sin_le_one _)).2
#align real.sin_le_one Real.sin_le_one
theorem cos_le_one : cos x ≤ 1 :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_cos_le_one _)).2
#align real.cos_le_one Real.cos_le_one
theorem neg_one_le_sin : -1 ≤ sin x :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_sin_le_one _)).1
#align real.neg_one_le_sin Real.neg_one_le_sin
theorem neg_one_le_cos : -1 ≤ cos x :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_cos_le_one _)).1
#align real.neg_one_le_cos Real.neg_one_le_cos
nonrec theorem cos_two_mul : cos (2 * x) = 2 * cos x ^ 2 - 1 :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [cos_two_mul]
#align real.cos_two_mul Real.cos_two_mul
nonrec theorem cos_two_mul' : cos (2 * x) = cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2 :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [cos_two_mul']
#align real.cos_two_mul' Real.cos_two_mul'
nonrec theorem sin_two_mul : sin (2 * x) = 2 * sin x * cos x :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [sin_two_mul]
#align real.sin_two_mul Real.sin_two_mul
nonrec theorem cos_sq : cos x ^ 2 = 1 / 2 + cos (2 * x) / 2 :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [cos_sq]
#align real.cos_sq Real.cos_sq
theorem cos_sq' : cos x ^ 2 = 1 - sin x ^ 2 := by rw [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, add_sub_cancel_left]
#align real.cos_sq' Real.cos_sq'
theorem sin_sq : sin x ^ 2 = 1 - cos x ^ 2 :=
eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 <| sin_sq_add_cos_sq _
#align real.sin_sq Real.sin_sq
lemma sin_sq_eq_half_sub : sin x ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - cos (2 * x) / 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_sq, ← sub_sub, sub_half]
theorem abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq (x : ℝ) : |sin x| = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← sin_sq, sqrt_sq_eq_abs]
#align real.abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq Real.abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq
theorem abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq (x : ℝ) : |cos x| = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← cos_sq', sqrt_sq_eq_abs]
#align real.abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq Real.abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq
theorem inv_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℝ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) : (1 + tan x ^ 2)⁻¹ = cos x ^ 2 :=
have : Complex.cos x ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg re) hx
ofReal_inj.1 <| by simpa using Complex.inv_one_add_tan_sq this
#align real.inv_one_add_tan_sq Real.inv_one_add_tan_sq
theorem tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℝ} (hx : cos x ≠ 0) :
tan x ^ 2 / (1 + tan x ^ 2) = sin x ^ 2 := by
simp only [← tan_mul_cos hx, mul_pow, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq hx, div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul]
#align real.tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq Real.tan_sq_div_one_add_tan_sq
theorem inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < cos x) : (√(1 + tan x ^ 2))⁻¹ = cos x := by
rw [← sqrt_sq hx.le, ← sqrt_inv, inv_one_add_tan_sq hx.ne']
#align real.inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq Real.inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq
theorem tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < cos x) :
tan x / √(1 + tan x ^ 2) = sin x := by
rw [← tan_mul_cos hx.ne', ← inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq Real.tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq
nonrec theorem cos_three_mul : cos (3 * x) = 4 * cos x ^ 3 - 3 * cos x := by
rw [← ofReal_inj]; simp [cos_three_mul]
#align real.cos_three_mul Real.cos_three_mul
nonrec theorem sin_three_mul : sin (3 * x) = 3 * sin x - 4 * sin x ^ 3 := by
rw [← ofReal_inj]; simp [sin_three_mul]
#align real.sin_three_mul Real.sin_three_mul
/-- The definition of `sinh` in terms of `exp`. -/
nonrec theorem sinh_eq (x : ℝ) : sinh x = (exp x - exp (-x)) / 2 :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [Complex.sinh]
#align real.sinh_eq Real.sinh_eq
@[simp]
theorem sinh_zero : sinh 0 = 0 := by simp [sinh]
#align real.sinh_zero Real.sinh_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 1,046 | 1,046 | theorem sinh_neg : sinh (-x) = -sinh x := by | simp [sinh, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Combination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.independent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Affine independence
This file defines affinely independent families of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineIndependent` defines affinely independent families of points
as those where no nontrivial weighted subtraction is `0`. This is
proved equivalent to two other formulations: linear independence of
the results of subtracting a base point in the family from the other
points in the family, or any equal affine combinations having the
same weights. A bundled type `Simplex` is provided for finite
affinely independent families of points, with an abbreviation
`Triangle` for the case of three points.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
open scoped Affine
section AffineIndependent
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
/-- An indexed family is said to be affinely independent if no
nontrivial weighted subtractions (where the sum of weights is 0) are
0. -/
def AffineIndependent (p : ι → P) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0
#align affine_independent AffineIndependent
/-- The definition of `AffineIndependent`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_def (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_independent_def affineIndependent_def
/-- A family with at most one point is affinely independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (p : ι → P) : AffineIndependent k p :=
fun _ _ h _ i hi => Fintype.eq_of_subsingleton_of_sum_eq h i hi
#align affine_independent_of_subsingleton affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
/-- A family indexed by a `Fintype` is affinely independent if and
only if no nontrivial weighted subtractions over `Finset.univ` (where
the sum of the weights is 0) are 0. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 0 → Finset.univ.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i, w i = 0 := by
constructor
· exact fun h w hw hs i => h Finset.univ w hw hs i (Finset.mem_univ _)
· intro h s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hs
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hw
replace h := h ((↑s : Set ι).indicator w) hw hs i
simpa [hi] using h
#align affine_independent_iff_of_fintype affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if the differences
from a base point in that family are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub (p : ι → P) (i1 : ι) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ LinearIndependent k fun i : { x // x ≠ i1 } => (p i -ᵥ p i1 : V) := by
classical
constructor
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
set f : ι → k := fun x => if hx : x = i1 then -∑ y ∈ s, g y else g ⟨x, hx⟩ with hfdef
let s2 : Finset ι := insert i1 (s.map (Embedding.subtype _))
have hfg : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, g x = f x := by
intro x
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
erw [dif_neg x.property, Subtype.coe_eta]
rw [hfg]
have hf : ∑ ι ∈ s2, f ι = 0 := by
rw [Finset.sum_insert
(Finset.not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property s (Classical.not_not.2 rfl)),
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => (hfg x).symm]
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos rfl]
exact neg_add_self _
have hs2 : s2.weightedVSub p f = (0 : V) := by
set f2 : ι → V := fun x => f x • (p x -ᵥ p i1) with hf2def
set g2 : { x // x ≠ i1 } → V := fun x => g x • (p x -ᵥ p i1)
have hf2g2 : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, f2 x = g2 x := by
simp only [g2, hf2def]
refine fun x => ?_
rw [hfg]
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s2 f p hf (p i1),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => hf2g2 x]
exact hg
exact h s2 f hf hs2 i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_map.2 ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at h
intro s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p hw (p i1), ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase w p i1, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply] at hs
let f : ι → V := fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i1)
have hs2 : (∑ i ∈ (s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1, f i) = 0 := by
rw [← hs]
convert Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem f fun x => Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
have h2 := h ((s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1) (fun x => w x) hs2
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype] at h2
have h2b : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ i1 → w i = 0 := fun i his hi =>
h2 ⟨i, hi⟩ (Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hi his)
exact Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw h2b i hi
#align affine_independent_iff_linear_independent_vsub affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub
/-- A set is affinely independent if and only if the differences from
a base point in that set are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub {s : Set P} {p₁ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P) ↔
LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → V) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (fun p => p : s → P) ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩]
constructor
· intro h
have hv : ∀ v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}), (v : V) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ s \ {p₁} := fun v =>
(vsub_left_injective p₁).mem_set_image.1 ((vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm ▸ v.property)
let f : (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } := fun x =>
⟨⟨(x : V) +ᵥ p₁, Set.mem_of_mem_diff (hv x)⟩, fun hx =>
Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff (hv x) (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (vadd_right_cancel p₁ (Subtype.ext_iff.1 (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
ext v
exact (vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm
· intro h
let f : { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } → (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) := fun x =>
⟨((x : s) : P) -ᵥ p₁, ⟨x, ⟨⟨(x : s).property, fun hx => x.property (Subtype.ext hx)⟩, rfl⟩⟩⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (vsub_left_cancel (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
#align affine_independent_set_iff_linear_independent_vsub affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub
/-- A set of nonzero vectors is linearly independent if and only if,
given a point `p₁`, the vectors added to `p₁` and `p₁` itself are
affinely independent. -/
theorem linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton {s : Set V}
(hs : ∀ v ∈ s, v ≠ (0 : V)) (p₁ : P) : LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : s → V) ↔
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : ({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s : Set P) → P) := by
rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k
(Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton p₁))]
have h : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s) \ {p₁}) = s := by
simp_rw [Set.union_diff_left, Set.image_diff (vsub_left_injective p₁), Set.image_image,
Set.image_singleton, vsub_self, vadd_vsub, Set.image_id']
exact Set.diff_singleton_eq_self fun h => hs 0 h rfl
rw [h]
#align linear_independent_set_iff_affine_independent_vadd_union_singleton linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point
have equal `Set.indicator`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s1 s2 : Finset ι) (w1 w2 : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s1, w1 i = 1 →
∑ i ∈ s2, w2 i = 1 →
s1.affineCombination k p w1 = s2.affineCombination k p w2 →
Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 = Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 := by
classical
constructor
· intro ha s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 heq
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s1 ∪ s2
· rw [← sub_eq_zero]
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w1 (s1.subset_union_left (s₂:=s2))] at hw1
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w2 (s1.subset_union_right)] at hw2
have hws : (∑ i ∈ s1 ∪ s2, (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) i) = 0 := by
simp [hw1, hw2]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (s1.subset_union_left (s₂:=s2)),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p s1.subset_union_right,
← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, Finset.affineCombination_vsub] at heq
exact ha (s1 ∪ s2) (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) hws heq i hi
· rw [← Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_union] at hi
have h₁ : Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_left _ i ↑s1 ↑s2) hi) h
have h₂ : Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_right _ i ↑s2 ↑s1) hi) h
simp [h₁, h₂]
· intro ha s w hw hs i0 hi0
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i0 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi0]
simp only [Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, const_apply]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i0 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi0 (Function.update_same _ _ _)
fun _ _ hne => Function.update_noteq hne _ _
let w2 := w + w1
have hw2 : ∑ i ∈ s, w2 i = 1 := by
simp_all only [w2, Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, zero_add]
have hw2s : s.affineCombination k p w2 = p i0 := by
simp_all only [w2, ← Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, zero_vadd]
replace ha := ha s s w2 w1 hw2 hw1 (hw1s.symm ▸ hw2s)
have hws : w2 i0 - w1 i0 = 0 := by
rw [← Finset.mem_coe] at hi0
rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w2, ← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w1, ha, sub_self]
simpa [w2] using hws
#align affine_independent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affine_combination_eq affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq
/-- A finite family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point are equal. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ ∀ w1 w2 : ι → k, ∑ i, w1 i = 1 → ∑ i, w2 i = 1 →
Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w1 = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w2 → w1 = w2 := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq]
constructor
· intro h w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
simpa only [Set.indicator_univ, Finset.coe_univ] using h _ _ w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
· intro h s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
have hw1' : (∑ i, (s1 : Set ι).indicator w1 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s1)]
have hw2' : (∑ i, (s2 : Set ι).indicator w2 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s2)]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (Finset.subset_univ s1),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p (Finset.subset_univ s2)] at hweq
exact h _ _ hw1' hw2' hweq
#align affine_independent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affine_combination_eq affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq
variable {k}
/-- If we single out one member of an affine-independent family of points and affinely transport
all others along the line joining them to this member, the resulting new family of points is affine-
independent.
This is the affine version of `LinearIndependent.units_smul`. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.units_lineMap {p : ι → P} (hp : AffineIndependent k p) (j : ι)
(w : ι → Units k) : AffineIndependent k fun i => AffineMap.lineMap (p j) (p i) (w i : k) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k _ j] at hp ⊢
simp only [AffineMap.lineMap_vsub_left, AffineMap.coe_const, AffineMap.lineMap_same, const_apply]
exact hp.units_smul fun i => w i
#align affine_independent.units_line_map AffineIndependent.units_lineMap
theorem AffineIndependent.indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 1) (h : s₁.affineCombination k p w₁ = s₂.affineCombination k p w₂) :
Set.indicator (↑s₁) w₁ = Set.indicator (↑s₂) w₂ :=
(affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq k p).1 ha s₁ s₂ w₁ w₂ hw₁ hw₂ h
#align affine_independent.indicator_eq_of_affine_combination_eq AffineIndependent.indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq
/-- An affinely independent family is injective, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.injective [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : Function.Injective p := by
intro i j hij
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub _ _ j] at ha
by_contra hij'
refine ha.ne_zero ⟨i, hij'⟩ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.mpr ?_)
simp_all only [ne_eq]
#align affine_independent.injective AffineIndependent.injective
/-- If a family is affinely independent, so is any subfamily given by
composition of an embedding into index type with the original
family. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.comp_embedding {ι2 : Type*} (f : ι2 ↪ ι) {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : AffineIndependent k (p ∘ f) := by
classical
intro fs w hw hs i0 hi0
let fs' := fs.map f
let w' i := if h : ∃ i2, f i2 = i then w h.choose else 0
have hw' : ∀ i2 : ι2, w' (f i2) = w i2 := by
intro i2
have h : ∃ i : ι2, f i = f i2 := ⟨i2, rfl⟩
have hs : h.choose = i2 := f.injective h.choose_spec
simp_rw [w', dif_pos h, hs]
have hw's : ∑ i ∈ fs', w' i = 0 := by
rw [← hw, Finset.sum_map]
simp [hw']
have hs' : fs'.weightedVSub p w' = (0 : V) := by
rw [← hs, Finset.weightedVSub_map]
congr with i
simp_all only [comp_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, exists_eq, dite_true]
rw [← ha fs' w' hw's hs' (f i0) ((Finset.mem_map' _).2 hi0), hw']
#align affine_independent.comp_embedding AffineIndependent.comp_embedding
/-- If a family is affinely independent, so is any subfamily indexed
by a subtype of the index type. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.subtype {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s : Set ι) :
AffineIndependent k fun i : s => p i :=
ha.comp_embedding (Embedding.subtype _)
#align affine_independent.subtype AffineIndependent.subtype
/-- If an indexed family of points is affinely independent, so is the
corresponding set of points. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.range {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P) := by
let f : Set.range p → ι := fun x => x.property.choose
have hf : ∀ x, p (f x) = x := fun x => x.property.choose_spec
let fe : Set.range p ↪ ι := ⟨f, fun x₁ x₂ he => Subtype.ext (hf x₁ ▸ hf x₂ ▸ he ▸ rfl)⟩
convert ha.comp_embedding fe
ext
simp [fe, hf]
#align affine_independent.range AffineIndependent.range
theorem affineIndependent_equiv {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') {p : ι' → P} :
AffineIndependent k (p ∘ e) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
refine ⟨?_, AffineIndependent.comp_embedding e.toEmbedding⟩
intro h
have : p = p ∘ e ∘ e.symm.toEmbedding := by
ext
simp
rw [this]
exact h.comp_embedding e.symm.toEmbedding
#align affine_independent_equiv affineIndependent_equiv
/-- If a set of points is affinely independent, so is any subset. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.mono {s t : Set P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : t → P)) (hs : s ⊆ t) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : s → P) :=
ha.comp_embedding (s.embeddingOfSubset t hs)
#align affine_independent.mono AffineIndependent.mono
/-- If the range of an injective indexed family of points is affinely
independent, so is that family. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.of_set_of_injective {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P)) (hi : Function.Injective p) :
AffineIndependent k p :=
ha.comp_embedding
(⟨fun i => ⟨p i, Set.mem_range_self _⟩, fun _ _ h => hi (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 h)⟩ :
ι ↪ Set.range p)
#align affine_independent.of_set_of_injective AffineIndependent.of_set_of_injective
section Composition
variable {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
/-- If the image of a family of points in affine space under an affine transformation is affine-
independent, then the original family of points is also affine-independent. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.of_comp {p : ι → P} (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) (hai : AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p)) :
AffineIndependent k p := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h h;
· haveI := h
apply affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
obtain ⟨i⟩ := h
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k p i]
simp_rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (f ∘ p) i, Function.comp_apply, ←
f.linearMap_vsub] at hai
exact LinearIndependent.of_comp f.linear hai
#align affine_independent.of_comp AffineIndependent.of_comp
/-- The image of a family of points in affine space, under an injective affine transformation, is
affine-independent. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.map' {p : ι → P} (hai : AffineIndependent k p) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p) := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h h
· haveI := h
apply affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
obtain ⟨i⟩ := h
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k p i] at hai
simp_rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (f ∘ p) i, Function.comp_apply, ←
f.linearMap_vsub]
have hf' : LinearMap.ker f.linear = ⊥ := by rwa [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, f.linear_injective_iff]
exact LinearIndependent.map' hai f.linear hf'
#align affine_independent.map' AffineIndependent.map'
/-- Injective affine maps preserve affine independence. -/
theorem AffineMap.affineIndependent_iff {p : ι → P} (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p :=
⟨AffineIndependent.of_comp f, fun hai => AffineIndependent.map' hai f hf⟩
#align affine_map.affine_independent_iff AffineMap.affineIndependent_iff
/-- Affine equivalences preserve affine independence of families of points. -/
theorem AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_iff {p : ι → P} (e : P ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
AffineIndependent k (e ∘ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p :=
e.toAffineMap.affineIndependent_iff e.toEquiv.injective
#align affine_equiv.affine_independent_iff AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_iff
/-- Affine equivalences preserve affine independence of subsets. -/
theorem AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_set_of_eq_iff {s : Set P} (e : P ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
AffineIndependent k ((↑) : e '' s → P₂) ↔ AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → P) := by
have : e ∘ ((↑) : s → P) = ((↑) : e '' s → P₂) ∘ (e : P ≃ P₂).image s := rfl
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← e.affineIndependent_iff, this, affineIndependent_equiv]
#align affine_equiv.affine_independent_set_of_eq_iff AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_set_of_eq_iff
end Composition
/-- If a family is affinely independent, and the spans of points
indexed by two subsets of the index type have a point in common, those
subsets of the index type have an element in common, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) {s1 s2 : Set ι} {p0 : P} (hp0s1 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s1))
(hp0s2 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s2)) : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ s1 ∩ s2 := by
rw [Set.image_eq_range] at hp0s1 hp0s2
rw [mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_affineCombination, ←
Finset.eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype] at hp0s1 hp0s2
rcases hp0s1 with ⟨fs1, hfs1, w1, hw1, hp0s1⟩
rcases hp0s2 with ⟨fs2, hfs2, w2, hw2, hp0s2⟩
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq] at ha
replace ha := ha fs1 fs2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 (hp0s1 ▸ hp0s2)
have hnz : ∑ i ∈ fs1, w1 i ≠ 0 := hw1.symm ▸ one_ne_zero
rcases Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hnz with ⟨i, hifs1, hinz⟩
simp_rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem (Finset.mem_coe.2 hifs1) w1, ha] at hinz
use i, hfs1 hifs1
exact hfs2 (Set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero hinz)
#align affine_independent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affine_span AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan
/-- If a family is affinely independent, the spans of points indexed
by disjoint subsets of the index type are disjoint, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.affineSpan_disjoint_of_disjoint [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) {s1 s2 : Set ι} (hd : Disjoint s1 s2) :
Disjoint (affineSpan k (p '' s1) : Set P) (affineSpan k (p '' s2)) := by
refine Set.disjoint_left.2 fun p0 hp0s1 hp0s2 => ?_
cases' ha.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan hp0s1 hp0s2 with i hi
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 hd hi
#align affine_independent.affine_span_disjoint_of_disjoint AffineIndependent.affineSpan_disjoint_of_disjoint
/-- If a family is affinely independent, a point in the family is in
the span of some of the points given by a subset of the index type if
and only if that point's index is in the subset, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem AffineIndependent.mem_affineSpan_iff [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (i : ι) (s : Set ι) : p i ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s) ↔ i ∈ s := by
constructor
· intro hs
have h :=
AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan ha hs
(mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _)))
rwa [← Set.nonempty_def, Set.inter_singleton_nonempty] at h
· exact fun h => mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_image_of_mem p h)
#align affine_independent.mem_affine_span_iff AffineIndependent.mem_affineSpan_iff
/-- If a family is affinely independent, a point in the family is not
in the affine span of the other points, if the underlying ring is
nontrivial. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.not_mem_affineSpan_diff [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (i : ι) (s : Set ι) : p i ∉ affineSpan k (p '' (s \ {i})) := by
simp [ha]
#align affine_independent.not_mem_affine_span_diff AffineIndependent.not_mem_affineSpan_diff
theorem exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind {t : Finset V}
(h : ¬AffineIndependent k ((↑) : t → V)) :
∃ f : V → k, ∑ e ∈ t, f e • e = 0 ∧ ∑ e ∈ t, f e = 0 ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, f x ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype] at h
simp only [exists_prop, not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨w, hw, hwt, i, hi⟩ := h
simp only [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ w ((↑) : t → V) hw 0,
vsub_eq_sub, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sub_zero] at hwt
let f : ∀ x : V, x ∈ t → k := fun x hx => w ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨fun x => if hx : x ∈ t then f x hx else (0 : k), ?_, ?_, by use i; simp [hi]⟩
on_goal 1 =>
suffices (∑ e ∈ t, dite (e ∈ t) (fun hx => f e hx • e) fun _ => 0) = 0 by
convert this
rename V => x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [hx]
all_goals
simp only [Finset.sum_dite_of_true fun _ h => h, Finset.mk_coe, hwt, hw]
#align exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind
variable {s : Finset ι} {w w₁ w₂ : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, we can characterise affine independence
in terms of linear combinations. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff {ι} {p : ι → V} :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), s.sum w = 0 → ∑ e ∈ s, w e • p e = 0 → ∀ e ∈ s, w e = 0 :=
forall₃_congr fun s w hw => by simp [s.weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination hw]
#align affine_independent_iff affineIndependent_iff
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero (hp : AffineIndependent k p)
(hw₀ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i = 0) : ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
affineIndependent_iff.1 hp _ _ hw₀ hw₁
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_of_sum_eq_sum (hp : AffineIndependent k p)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i) (hwp : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i • p i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i • p i) :
∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i := by
refine fun i hi ↦ sub_eq_zero.1 (hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero (w := w₁ - w₂) ?_ ?_ _ hi) <;>
simpa [sub_mul, sub_smul, sub_eq_zero]
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero_subtype {s : Finset V}
(hp : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V)) {w : V → k} (hw₀ : ∑ x ∈ s, w x = 0)
(hw₁ : ∑ x ∈ s, w x • x = 0) : ∀ x ∈ s, w x = 0 := by
rw [← sum_attach] at hw₀ hw₁
exact fun x hx ↦ hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw₀ hw₁ ⟨x, hx⟩ (mem_univ _)
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_of_sum_eq_sum_subtype {s : Finset V}
(hp : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V)) {w₁ w₂ : V → k} (hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i)
(hwp : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i • i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i • i) : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i := by
refine fun i hi => sub_eq_zero.1 (hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero_subtype (w := w₁ - w₂) ?_ ?_ _ hi) <;>
simpa [sub_mul, sub_smul, sub_eq_zero]
/-- Given an affinely independent family of points, a weighted subtraction lies in the
`vectorSpan` of two points given as affine combinations if and only if it is a weighted
subtraction with weights a multiple of the difference between the weights of the two points. -/
theorem weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair {p : ι → P} (h : AffineIndependent k p) {w w₁ w₂ : ι → k}
{s : Finset ι} (hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) :
s.weightedVSub p w ∈
vectorSpan k ({s.affineCombination k p w₁, s.affineCombination k p w₂} : Set P) ↔
∃ r : k, ∀ i ∈ s, w i = r * (w₁ i - w₂ i) := by
rw [mem_vectorSpan_pair]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
refine ⟨r, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rw [s.affineCombination_vsub, ← s.weightedVSub_const_smul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub] at hr
have hw' : (∑ j ∈ s, (r • (w₁ - w₂) - w) j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.sub_apply, smul_sub, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ←
Finset.smul_sum, hw, hw₁, hw₂, sub_self]
have hr' := h s _ hw' hr i hi
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← smul_eq_mul]
exact hr'
· rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
refine ⟨r, ?_⟩
let w' i := r * (w₁ i - w₂ i)
change ∀ i ∈ s, w i = w' i at hr
rw [s.weightedVSub_congr hr fun _ _ => rfl, s.affineCombination_vsub, ←
s.weightedVSub_const_smul]
congr
#align weighted_vsub_mem_vector_span_pair weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair
/-- Given an affinely independent family of points, an affine combination lies in the
span of two points given as affine combinations if and only if it is an affine combination
with weights those of one point plus a multiple of the difference between the weights of the
two points. -/
theorem affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair {p : ι → P} (h : AffineIndependent k p)
{w w₁ w₂ : ι → k} {s : Finset ι} (_ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k p w ∈ line[k, s.affineCombination k p w₁, s.affineCombination k p w₂] ↔
∃ r : k, ∀ i ∈ s, w i = r * (w₂ i - w₁ i) + w₁ i := by
rw [← vsub_vadd (s.affineCombination k p w) (s.affineCombination k p w₁),
AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _),
direction_affineSpan, s.affineCombination_vsub, Set.pair_comm,
weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair h _ hw₂ hw₁]
· simp only [Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
· simp_all only [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, sub_self]
#align affine_combination_mem_affine_span_pair affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair
end AffineIndependent
section DivisionRing
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
/-- An affinely independent set of points can be extended to such a
set that spans the whole space. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Independent.lean | 572 | 602 | theorem exists_subset_affineIndependent_affineSpan_eq_top {s : Set P}
(h : AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P)) :
∃ t : Set P, s ⊆ t ∧ AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : t → P) ∧ affineSpan k t = ⊤ := by |
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩)
· have p₁ : P := AddTorsor.nonempty.some
let hsv := Basis.ofVectorSpace k V
have hsvi := hsv.linearIndependent
have hsvt := hsv.span_eq
rw [Basis.coe_ofVectorSpace] at hsvi hsvt
have h0 : ∀ v : V, v ∈ Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex k V → v ≠ 0 := by
intro v hv
simpa [hsv] using hsv.ne_zero ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton k h0 p₁] at hsvi
exact
⟨{p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' _, Set.empty_subset _, hsvi,
affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top p₁ hsvt⟩
· rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k hp₁] at h
let bsv := Basis.extend h
have hsvi := bsv.linearIndependent
have hsvt := bsv.span_eq
rw [Basis.coe_extend] at hsvi hsvt
have hsv := h.subset_extend (Set.subset_univ _)
have h0 : ∀ v : V, v ∈ h.extend (Set.subset_univ _) → v ≠ 0 := by
intro v hv
simpa [bsv] using bsv.ne_zero ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton k h0 p₁] at hsvi
refine ⟨{p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' h.extend (Set.subset_univ _), ?_, ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ?_ (Set.union_subset_union_right _ (Set.image_subset _ hsv))
simp [Set.image_image]
· use hsvi
exact affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top p₁ hsvt
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
#align_import data.set.pointwise.iterate from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Results about pointwise operations on sets with iteration.
-/
open Pointwise
open Set Function
/-- Let `n : ℤ` and `s` a subset of a commutative group `G` that is invariant under preimage for
the map `x ↦ x^n`. Then `s` is invariant under the pointwise action of the subgroup of elements
`g : G` such that `g^(n^j) = 1` for some `j : ℕ`. (This subgroup is called the Prüfer subgroup when
`G` is the `Circle` and `n` is prime.) -/
@[to_additive
"Let `n : ℤ` and `s` a subset of an additive commutative group `G` that is invariant
under preimage for the map `x ↦ n • x`. Then `s` is invariant under the pointwise action of
the additive subgroup of elements `g : G` such that `(n^j) • g = 0` for some `j : ℕ`.
(This additive subgroup is called the Prüfer subgroup when `G` is the `AddCircle` and `n` is
prime.)"]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Iterate.lean | 31 | 42 | theorem smul_eq_self_of_preimage_zpow_eq_self {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] {n : ℤ} {s : Set G}
(hs : (fun x => x ^ n) ⁻¹' s = s) {g : G} {j : ℕ} (hg : g ^ n ^ j = 1) : g • s = s := by |
suffices ∀ {g' : G} (_ : g' ^ n ^ j = 1), g' • s ⊆ s by
refine le_antisymm (this hg) ?_
conv_lhs => rw [← smul_inv_smul g s]
replace hg : g⁻¹ ^ n ^ j = 1 := by rw [inv_zpow, hg, inv_one]
simpa only [le_eq_subset, set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff] using this hg
rw [(IsFixedPt.preimage_iterate hs j : (zpowGroupHom n)^[j] ⁻¹' s = s).symm]
rintro g' hg' - ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
change (zpowGroupHom n)^[j] (g' * y) ∈ s
replace hg' : (zpowGroupHom n)^[j] g' = 1 := by simpa [zpowGroupHom]
rwa [iterate_map_mul, hg', one_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
#align_import data.list.sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f808feb6c18afddb25e66a71d317643cf7fb5fbb"
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u v
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
#align list.keys List.keys
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
#align list.keys_nil List.keys_nil
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
#align list.keys_cons List.keys_cons
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem Sigma.fst
#align list.mem_keys_of_mem List.mem_keys_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
#align list.exists_of_mem_keys List.exists_of_mem_keys
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
#align list.mem_keys List.mem_keys
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
#align list.not_mem_keys List.not_mem_keys
theorem not_eq_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨b, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
#align list.not_eq_key List.not_eq_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
#align list.nodupkeys List.NodupKeys
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
#align list.nodupkeys_iff_pairwise List.nodupKeys_iff_pairwise
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
#align list.nodupkeys.pairwise_ne List.NodupKeys.pairwise_ne
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
#align list.nodupkeys_nil List.nodupKeys_nil
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 102 | 103 | theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by | simp [keys, NodupKeys]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
#align_import probability.martingale.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ba074af83b6cf54c3104e59402b39410ddbd6dca"
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `Probability.Process.Stopping`.
### Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `MeasureTheory.martingale_condexp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `fun i => μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
#align measure_theory.martingale MeasureTheory.Martingale
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.supermartingale MeasureTheory.Supermartingale
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.submartingale MeasureTheory.Submartingale
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condexp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_const MeasureTheory.martingale_const
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
#align measure_theory.martingale_const_fun MeasureTheory.martingale_const_fun
variable (E)
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condexp_zero]; simp⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_zero MeasureTheory.martingale_zero
variable {E}
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.martingale.adapted MeasureTheory.Martingale.adapted
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
#align measure_theory.martingale.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Martingale.stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_ae_eq (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) : μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
#align measure_theory.martingale.condexp_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.condexp_ae_eq
protected theorem integrable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condexp.congr (hf.condexp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
#align measure_theory.martingale.integrable MeasureTheory.Martingale.integrable
theorem setIntegral_eq [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j)
{s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) : ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← @setIntegral_condexp _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) m0 _ _ _ (ℱ.le i) _ (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm
#align measure_theory.martingale.set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq := setIntegral_eq
theorem add (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exact (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij))
#align measure_theory.martingale.add MeasureTheory.Martingale.add
theorem neg (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.adapted.neg, fun i j hij => (condexp_neg (f j)).trans (hf.2 i j hij).neg⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale.neg MeasureTheory.Martingale.neg
theorem sub (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
#align measure_theory.martingale.sub MeasureTheory.Martingale.sub
theorem smul (c : ℝ) (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
refine (condexp_smul c (f j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
#align measure_theory.martingale.smul MeasureTheory.Martingale.smul
theorem supermartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Supermartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale.supermartingale MeasureTheory.Martingale.supermartingale
theorem submartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).symm.le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale.submartingale MeasureTheory.Martingale.submartingale
end Martingale
theorem martingale_iff [PartialOrder E] :
Martingale f ℱ μ ↔ Supermartingale f ℱ μ ∧ Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.supermartingale, hf.submartingale⟩, fun ⟨hf₁, hf₂⟩ =>
⟨hf₁.1, fun i j hij => (hf₁.2.1 i j hij).antisymm (hf₂.2.1 i j hij)⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_iff MeasureTheory.martingale_iff
theorem martingale_condexp (f : Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω)
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] : Martingale (fun i => μ[f|ℱ i]) ℱ μ :=
⟨fun _ => stronglyMeasurable_condexp, fun _ j hij => condexp_condexp_of_le (ℱ.mono hij) (ℱ.le j)⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_condexp MeasureTheory.martingale_condexp
namespace Supermartingale
protected theorem adapted [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.adapted MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.adapted
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.stronglyMeasurable
protected theorem integrable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
hf.2.2 i
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.integrable MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.integrable
theorem condexp_ae_le [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
#align measure_theory.supermartingale.condexp_ae_le MeasureTheory.Supermartingale.condexp_ae_le
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 179 | 184 | theorem setIntegral_le [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) :
∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ := by |
rw [← setIntegral_condexp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_mono_ae integrable_condexp.integrableOn (hf.integrable i).integrableOn ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ heq using heq
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import order.filter.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `Filter` : filters on a set;
* `Filter.principal` : filter of all sets containing a given set;
* `Filter.map`, `Filter.comap` : operations on filters;
* `Filter.Tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `Filter.Eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `Filter.Frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` :
a tactic that takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`,
and replaces a goal `s ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `Filter.NeBot f` : a utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `Filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `Filter.Tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on Topology.Basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from Topology.Basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Order
open scoped Classical
universe u v w x y
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure Filter (α : Type*) where
/-- The set of sets that belong to the filter. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set `Set.univ` belongs to any filter. -/
univ_sets : Set.univ ∈ sets
/-- If a set belongs to a filter, then its superset belongs to the filter as well. -/
sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets
/-- If two sets belong to a filter, then their intersection belongs to the filter as well. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets
#align filter Filter
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (Filter α) :=
⟨fun U F => U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_mk {t : Set (Set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_mk Filter.mem_mk
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sets Filter.mem_sets
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
#align filter.inhabited_mem Filter.inhabitedMem
theorem filter_eq : ∀ {f g : Filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align filter.filter_eq Filter.filter_eq
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
#align filter.filter_eq_iff Filter.filter_eq_iff
protected theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g := by
simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, Filter.mem_sets]
#align filter.ext_iff Filter.ext_iff
@[ext]
protected theorem ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
Filter.ext_iff.2
#align filter.ext Filter.ext
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
#align filter.coext Filter.coext
@[simp]
theorem univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
#align filter.univ_mem Filter.univ_mem
theorem mem_of_superset {x y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ f) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset hx hxy
#align filter.mem_of_superset Filter.mem_of_superset
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
theorem inter_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets hs ht
#align filter.inter_mem Filter.inter_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_iff Filter.inter_mem_iff
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.diff_mem Filter.diff_mem
theorem univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => h x
#align filter.univ_mem' Filter.univ_mem'
theorem mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : { x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t } ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ h₁
#align filter.mp_mem Filter.mp_mem
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
#align filter.congr_sets Filter.congr_sets
/-- Override `sets` field of a filter to provide better definitional equality. -/
protected def copy (f : Filter α) (S : Set (Set α)) (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : Filter α where
sets := S
univ_sets := (hmem _).2 univ_mem
sets_of_superset h hsub := (hmem _).2 <| mem_of_superset ((hmem _).1 h) hsub
inter_sets h₁ h₂ := (hmem _).2 <| inter_mem ((hmem _).1 h₁) ((hmem _).1 h₂)
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
@[simp] lemma mem_copy {S hmem} : s ∈ f.copy S hmem ↔ s ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem biInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Finite) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
Finite.induction_on hf (by simp) fun _ _ hs => by simp [hs]
#align filter.bInter_mem Filter.biInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem biInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} (is : Finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
biInter_mem is.finite_toSet
#align filter.bInter_finset_mem Filter.biInter_finset_mem
alias _root_.Finset.iInter_mem_sets := biInter_finset_mem
#align finset.Inter_mem_sets Finset.iInter_mem_sets
-- attribute [protected] Finset.iInter_mem_sets porting note: doesn't work
@[simp]
theorem sInter_mem {s : Set (Set α)} (hfin : s.Finite) : ⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem hfin]
#align filter.sInter_mem Filter.sInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem iInter_mem {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Finite β] : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
(sInter_mem (finite_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align filter.Inter_mem Filter.iInter_mem
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_subset_iff Filter.exists_mem_subset_iff
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
#align filter.monotone_mem Filter.monotone_mem
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_and_iff Filter.exists_mem_and_iff
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
#align filter.forall_in_swap Filter.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
/--
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f` and terms
`h₁ : t₁ ∈ f, ⋯, hₙ : tₙ ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t₁ → ⋯ → x ∈ tₙ → x ∈ s`.
The list is an optional parameter, `[]` being its default value.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ], intros a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ }`.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] using e` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
Combining both shortcuts is done by writing `filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ using e`.
Note that in this case, the `aᵢ` terms can be used in `e`.
-/
syntax (name := filterUpwards) "filter_upwards" (" [" term,* "]")?
(" with" (ppSpace colGt term:max)*)? (" using " term)? : tactic
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| filter_upwards $[[$[$args],*]]? $[with $wth*]? $[using $usingArg]?) => do
let config : ApplyConfig := {newGoals := ApplyNewGoals.nonDependentOnly}
for e in args.getD #[] |>.reverse do
let goal ← getMainGoal
replaceMainGoal <| ← goal.withContext <| runTermElab do
let m ← mkFreshExprMVar none
let lem ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType
(← ``(Filter.mp_mem $e $(← Term.exprToSyntax m))) (← goal.getType)
goal.assign lem
return [m.mvarId!]
liftMetaTactic fun goal => do
goal.apply (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``Filter.univ_mem') config
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| dsimp (config := {zeta := false}) only [Set.mem_setOf_eq])
if let some l := wth then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| intro $[$l]*)
if let some e := usingArg then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| exact $e)
end Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
section Principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : Set α) : Filter α where
sets := { t | s ⊆ t }
univ_sets := subset_univ s
sets_of_superset hx := Subset.trans hx
inter_sets := subset_inter
#align filter.principal Filter.principal
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "𝓟" => Filter.principal
@[simp] theorem mem_principal {s t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal Filter.mem_principal
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal_self Filter.mem_principal_self
end Principal
open Filter
section Join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : Filter (Filter α)) : Filter α where
sets := { s | { t : Filter α | s ∈ t } ∈ f }
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, univ_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, setOf_true]
sets_of_superset hx xy := mem_of_superset hx fun f h => mem_of_superset h xy
inter_sets hx hy := mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) fun f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => inter_mem h₁ h₂
#align filter.join Filter.join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {s : Set α} {f : Filter (Filter α)} : s ∈ join f ↔ { t | s ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_join Filter.mem_join
end Join
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance : PartialOrder (Filter α) where
le f g := ∀ ⦃U : Set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := filter_eq <| Subset.antisymm h₂ h₁
le_refl a := Subset.rfl
le_trans a b c h₁ h₂ := Subset.trans h₂ h₁
theorem le_def : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.le_def Filter.le_def
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align filter.not_le Filter.not_le
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
#align filter.generate_sets Filter.GenerateSets
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
#align filter.generate Filter.generate
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
#align filter.sets_iff_generate Filter.le_generate_iff
theorem mem_generate_iff {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction h with
| @basic V V_in =>
exact ⟨{V}, singleton_subset_iff.2 V_in, finite_singleton _, (sInter_singleton _).subset⟩
| univ => exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, finite_empty, subset_univ _⟩
| superset _ hVW hV =>
rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, ht, htV.trans hVW⟩
| inter _ _ hV hW =>
rcases hV, hW with ⟨⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩, u, hus, hu, huW⟩
exact
⟨t ∪ u, union_subset hts hus, ht.union hu,
(sInter_union _ _).subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter htV huW⟩
· rcases h with ⟨t, hts, tfin, h⟩
exact mem_of_superset ((sInter_mem tfin).2 fun V hV => GenerateSets.basic <| hts hV) h
#align filter.mem_generate_iff Filter.mem_generate_iff
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
#align filter.mk_of_closure Filter.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.mk_of_closure_sets Filter.mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align filter.gi_generate Filter.giGenerate
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : Inf (Filter α) :=
⟨fun f g : Filter α =>
{ sets := { s | ∃ a ∈ f, ∃ b ∈ g, s = a ∩ b }
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy
refine
⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha subset_union_left, b ∪ y,
mem_of_superset hb subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
inter_sets := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, ?_⟩
ac_rfl }⟩
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inf_iff Filter.mem_inf_iff
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_left Filter.mem_inf_of_left
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_right Filter.mem_inf_of_right
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_inf Filter.inter_mem_inf
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
#align filter.mem_inf_of_inter Filter.mem_inf_of_inter
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_iff_superset Filter.mem_inf_iff_superset
instance : Top (Filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := { s | ∀ x, x ∈ s }
univ_sets := fun x => mem_univ x
sets_of_superset := fun hx hxy a => hxy (hx a)
inter_sets := fun hx hy _ => mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
theorem mem_top_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_top_iff_forall Filter.mem_top_iff_forall
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ s = univ := by
rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.mem_top Filter.mem_top
section CompleteLattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for some lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) :=
{ @OrderDual.instCompleteLattice _ (giGenerate α).liftCompleteLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _s hs => (mem_top.1 hs).symm ▸ univ_mem
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
sSup := join ∘ 𝓟
le_sSup := fun _ _f hf _s hs => hs hf
sSup_le := fun _ _f hf _s hs _g hg => hf _ hg hs }
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
/-- A filter is `NeBot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set does not belong to
the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition of a filter but we prefer to have a
`CompleteLattice` structure on `Filter _`, so we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class NeBot (f : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- The filter is nontrivial: `f ≠ ⊥` or equivalently, `∅ ∉ f`. -/
ne' : f ≠ ⊥
#align filter.ne_bot Filter.NeBot
theorem neBot_iff {f : Filter α} : NeBot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.ne_bot_iff Filter.neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
#align filter.ne_bot.ne Filter.NeBot.ne
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
#align filter.not_ne_bot Filter.not_neBot
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.mono Filter.NeBot.mono
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
#align filter.ne_bot_of_le Filter.neBot_of_le
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.sup_ne_bot Filter.sup_neBot
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
#align filter.not_disjoint_self_iff Filter.not_disjoint_self_iff
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
#align filter.bot_sets_eq Filter.bot_sets_eq
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
#align filter.sup_sets_eq Filter.sup_sets_eq
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
#align filter.Sup_sets_eq Filter.sSup_sets_eq
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
#align filter.supr_sets_eq Filter.iSup_sets_eq
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
#align filter.generate_empty Filter.generate_empty
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
#align filter.generate_univ Filter.generate_univ
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
#align filter.generate_union Filter.generate_union
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
#align filter.generate_Union Filter.generate_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : Filter α) :=
trivial
#align filter.mem_bot Filter.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sup Filter.mem_sup
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
#align filter.union_mem_sup Filter.union_mem_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {x : Set α} {s : Set (Filter α)} : x ∈ sSup s ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : Filter α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_Sup Filter.mem_sSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter]
#align filter.mem_supr Filter.mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
#align filter.supr_ne_bot Filter.iSup_neBot
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
show generate _ = generate _ from congr_arg _ <| congr_arg sSup <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align filter.infi_eq_generate Filter.iInf_eq_generate
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
#align filter.mem_infi_of_mem Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem
theorem mem_iInf_of_iInter {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} {I : Set ι} (I_fin : I.Finite)
{V : I → Set α} (hV : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i) (hU : ⋂ i, V i ⊆ U) : U ∈ ⨅ i, s i := by
haveI := I_fin.fintype
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 fun i => ?_) hU
exact mem_iInf_of_mem (i : ι) (hV _)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_Inter Filter.mem_iInf_of_iInter
theorem mem_iInf {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : I → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
constructor
· rw [iInf_eq_generate, mem_generate_iff]
rintro ⟨t, tsub, tfin, tinter⟩
rcases eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion tfin tsub with ⟨I, Ifin, σ, σfin, σsub, rfl⟩
rw [sInter_iUnion] at tinter
set V := fun i => U ∪ ⋂₀ σ i with hV
have V_in : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i := by
rintro i
have : ⋂₀ σ i ∈ s i := by
rw [sInter_mem (σfin _)]
apply σsub
exact mem_of_superset this subset_union_right
refine ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, ?_⟩
rwa [hV, ← union_iInter, union_eq_self_of_subset_right]
· rintro ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInf_of_iInter Ifin V_in Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_infi Filter.mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf' {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : ι → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧
(∀ i ∉ I, V i = univ) ∧ (U = ⋂ i ∈ I, V i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
simp only [mem_iInf, SetCoe.forall', biInter_eq_iInter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨I, If, V, hVs, _, hVU, _⟩ => ⟨I, If, fun i => V i, fun i => hVs i, hVU⟩⟩
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hV, rfl⟩
refine ⟨I, If, fun i => if hi : i ∈ I then V ⟨i, hi⟩ else univ, fun i => ?_, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [hV _, univ_mem]
· exact dif_neg hi
· simp only [iInter_dite, biInter_eq_iInter, dif_pos (Subtype.coe_prop _), Subtype.coe_eta,
iInter_univ, inter_univ, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
#align filter.mem_infi' Filter.mem_iInf'
theorem exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} {s}
(hs : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) : ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
let ⟨_, _, V, hVs, _, _, hVU'⟩ := mem_iInf'.1 hs; ⟨V, hVs, hVU'⟩
#align filter.exists_Inter_of_mem_infi Filter.exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 662 | 666 | theorem mem_iInf_of_finite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
(s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i := by |
refine ⟨exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun i => mem_iInf_of_mem i (ht i)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kevin Buzzard, Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Patrick Massot
This file is to a certain extent based on `quotient_module.lean` by Johannes Hölzl.
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset
#align_import group_theory.quotient_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59694bd07f0a39c5beccba34bd9f413a160782bf"
/-!
# Quotients of groups by normal subgroups
This files develops the basic theory of quotients of groups by normal subgroups. In particular it
proves Noether's first and second isomorphism theorems.
## Main definitions
* `mk'`: the canonical group homomorphism `G →* G/N` given a normal subgroup `N` of `G`.
* `lift φ`: the group homomorphism `G/N →* H` given a group homomorphism `φ : G →* H` such that
`N ⊆ ker φ`.
* `map f`: the group homomorphism `G/N →* H/M` given a group homomorphism `f : G →* H` such that
`N ⊆ f⁻¹(M)`.
## Main statements
* `QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivRange`: Noether's first isomorphism theorem, an explicit
isomorphism `G/ker φ → range φ` for every group homomorphism `φ : G →* H`.
* `QuotientGroup.quotientInfEquivProdNormalQuotient`: Noether's second isomorphism theorem, an
explicit isomorphism between `H/(H ∩ N)` and `(HN)/N` given a subgroup `H` and a normal subgroup
`N` of a group `G`.
* `QuotientGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotient`: Noether's third isomorphism theorem,
the canonical isomorphism between `(G / N) / (M / N)` and `G / M`, where `N ≤ M`.
## Tags
isomorphism theorems, quotient groups
-/
open Function
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
namespace QuotientGroup
variable {G : Type u} [Group G] (N : Subgroup G) [nN : N.Normal] {H : Type v} [Group H]
{M : Type x} [Monoid M]
/-- The congruence relation generated by a normal subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The additive congruence relation generated by a normal additive subgroup."]
protected def con : Con G where
toSetoid := leftRel N
mul' := @fun a b c d hab hcd => by
rw [leftRel_eq] at hab hcd ⊢
dsimp only
calc
(a * c)⁻¹ * (b * d) = c⁻¹ * (a⁻¹ * b) * c⁻¹⁻¹ * (c⁻¹ * d) := by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left]
_ ∈ N := N.mul_mem (nN.conj_mem _ hab _) hcd
#align quotient_group.con QuotientGroup.con
#align quotient_add_group.con QuotientAddGroup.con
@[to_additive]
instance Quotient.group : Group (G ⧸ N) :=
(QuotientGroup.con N).group
#align quotient_group.quotient.group QuotientGroup.Quotient.group
#align quotient_add_group.quotient.add_group QuotientAddGroup.Quotient.addGroup
/-- The group homomorphism from `G` to `G/N`. -/
@[to_additive "The additive group homomorphism from `G` to `G/N`."]
def mk' : G →* G ⧸ N :=
MonoidHom.mk' QuotientGroup.mk fun _ _ => rfl
#align quotient_group.mk' QuotientGroup.mk'
#align quotient_add_group.mk' QuotientAddGroup.mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_mk' : (mk' N : G → G ⧸ N) = mk :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.coe_mk' QuotientGroup.coe_mk'
#align quotient_add_group.coe_mk' QuotientAddGroup.coe_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_apply (x : G) : mk' N x = x :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.mk'_apply QuotientGroup.mk'_apply
#align quotient_add_group.mk'_apply QuotientAddGroup.mk'_apply
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_surjective : Surjective <| mk' N :=
@mk_surjective _ _ N
#align quotient_group.mk'_surjective QuotientGroup.mk'_surjective
#align quotient_add_group.mk'_surjective QuotientAddGroup.mk'_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_mk' {x y : G} : mk' N x = mk' N y ↔ ∃ z ∈ N, x * z = y :=
QuotientGroup.eq'.trans <| by
simp only [← _root_.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, exists_prop, exists_eq_right]
#align quotient_group.mk'_eq_mk' QuotientGroup.mk'_eq_mk'
#align quotient_add_group.mk'_eq_mk' QuotientAddGroup.mk'_eq_mk'
open scoped Pointwise in
@[to_additive]
theorem sound (U : Set (G ⧸ N)) (g : N.op) :
g • (mk' N) ⁻¹' U = (mk' N) ⁻¹' U := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
congr! 1
exact Quotient.sound ⟨g⁻¹, rfl⟩
/-- Two `MonoidHom`s from a quotient group are equal if their compositions with
`QuotientGroup.mk'` are equal.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext 1100) "Two `AddMonoidHom`s from an additive quotient group are equal if
their compositions with `AddQuotientGroup.mk'` are equal.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. "]
theorem monoidHom_ext ⦃f g : G ⧸ N →* M⦄ (h : f.comp (mk' N) = g.comp (mk' N)) : f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext fun x => QuotientGroup.induction_on x <| (DFunLike.congr_fun h : _)
#align quotient_group.monoid_hom_ext QuotientGroup.monoidHom_ext
#align quotient_add_group.add_monoid_hom_ext QuotientAddGroup.addMonoidHom_ext
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eq_one_iff {N : Subgroup G} [nN : N.Normal] (x : G) : (x : G ⧸ N) = 1 ↔ x ∈ N := by
refine QuotientGroup.eq.trans ?_
rw [mul_one, Subgroup.inv_mem_iff]
#align quotient_group.eq_one_iff QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff
#align quotient_add_group.eq_zero_iff QuotientAddGroup.eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_le_range_iff {I : Type w} [Group I] (f : G →* H) [f.range.Normal] (g : H →* I) :
g.ker ≤ f.range ↔ (mk' f.range).comp g.ker.subtype = 1 :=
⟨fun h => MonoidHom.ext fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => (eq_one_iff _).mpr <| h hx,
fun h x hx => (eq_one_iff _).mp <| by exact DFunLike.congr_fun h ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ker_mk' : MonoidHom.ker (QuotientGroup.mk' N : G →* G ⧸ N) = N :=
Subgroup.ext eq_one_iff
#align quotient_group.ker_mk QuotientGroup.ker_mk'
#align quotient_add_group.ker_mk QuotientAddGroup.ker_mk'
-- Porting note: I think this is misnamed without the prime
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_div_mem {N : Subgroup G} [nN : N.Normal] {x y : G} :
(x : G ⧸ N) = y ↔ x / y ∈ N := by
refine eq_comm.trans (QuotientGroup.eq.trans ?_)
rw [nN.mem_comm_iff, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align quotient_group.eq_iff_div_mem QuotientGroup.eq_iff_div_mem
#align quotient_add_group.eq_iff_sub_mem QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem
-- for commutative groups we don't need normality assumption
@[to_additive]
instance Quotient.commGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (N : Subgroup G) : CommGroup (G ⧸ N) :=
{ toGroup := @QuotientGroup.Quotient.group _ _ N N.normal_of_comm
mul_comm := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂' a b fun a b => congr_arg mk (mul_comm a b) }
#align quotient_group.quotient.comm_group QuotientGroup.Quotient.commGroup
#align quotient_add_group.quotient.add_comm_group QuotientAddGroup.Quotient.addCommGroup
local notation " Q " => G ⧸ N
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_one : ((1 : G) : Q) = 1 :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.coe_one QuotientGroup.mk_one
#align quotient_add_group.coe_zero QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_mul (a b : G) : ((a * b : G) : Q) = a * b :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.coe_mul QuotientGroup.mk_mul
#align quotient_add_group.coe_add QuotientAddGroup.mk_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_inv (a : G) : ((a⁻¹ : G) : Q) = (a : Q)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.coe_inv QuotientGroup.mk_inv
#align quotient_add_group.coe_neg QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_div (a b : G) : ((a / b : G) : Q) = a / b :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.coe_div QuotientGroup.mk_div
#align quotient_add_group.coe_sub QuotientAddGroup.mk_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_pow (a : G) (n : ℕ) : ((a ^ n : G) : Q) = (a : Q) ^ n :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.coe_pow QuotientGroup.mk_pow
#align quotient_add_group.coe_nsmul QuotientAddGroup.mk_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_zpow (a : G) (n : ℤ) : ((a ^ n : G) : Q) = (a : Q) ^ n :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.coe_zpow QuotientGroup.mk_zpow
#align quotient_add_group.coe_zsmul QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_prod {G ι : Type*} [CommGroup G] (N : Subgroup G) (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → G} :
((Finset.prod s f : G) : G ⧸ N) = Finset.prod s (fun i => (f i : G ⧸ N)) :=
map_prod (QuotientGroup.mk' N) _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma map_mk'_self : N.map (mk' N) = ⊥ := by aesop
/-- A group homomorphism `φ : G →* M` with `N ⊆ ker(φ)` descends (i.e. `lift`s) to a
group homomorphism `G/N →* M`. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddGroup` homomorphism `φ : G →+ M` with `N ⊆ ker(φ)` descends (i.e. `lift`s)
to a group homomorphism `G/N →* M`."]
def lift (φ : G →* M) (HN : N ≤ φ.ker) : Q →* M :=
(QuotientGroup.con N).lift φ fun x y h => by
simp only [QuotientGroup.con, leftRel_apply, Con.rel_mk] at h
rw [Con.ker_rel]
calc
φ x = φ (y * (x⁻¹ * y)⁻¹) := by rw [mul_inv_rev, inv_inv, mul_inv_cancel_left]
_ = φ y := by rw [φ.map_mul, HN (N.inv_mem h), mul_one]
#align quotient_group.lift QuotientGroup.lift
#align quotient_add_group.lift QuotientAddGroup.lift
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_mk {φ : G →* M} (HN : N ≤ φ.ker) (g : G) : lift N φ HN (g : Q) = φ g :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.lift_mk QuotientGroup.lift_mk
#align quotient_add_group.lift_mk QuotientAddGroup.lift_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_mk' {φ : G →* M} (HN : N ≤ φ.ker) (g : G) : lift N φ HN (mk g : Q) = φ g :=
rfl
-- TODO: replace `mk` with `mk'`)
#align quotient_group.lift_mk' QuotientGroup.lift_mk'
#align quotient_add_group.lift_mk' QuotientAddGroup.lift_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_quot_mk {φ : G →* M} (HN : N ≤ φ.ker) (g : G) :
lift N φ HN (Quot.mk _ g : Q) = φ g :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.lift_quot_mk QuotientGroup.lift_quot_mk
#align quotient_add_group.lift_quot_mk QuotientAddGroup.lift_quot_mk
/-- A group homomorphism `f : G →* H` induces a map `G/N →* H/M` if `N ⊆ f⁻¹(M)`. -/
@[to_additive
"An `AddGroup` homomorphism `f : G →+ H` induces a map `G/N →+ H/M` if `N ⊆ f⁻¹(M)`."]
def map (M : Subgroup H) [M.Normal] (f : G →* H) (h : N ≤ M.comap f) : G ⧸ N →* H ⧸ M := by
refine QuotientGroup.lift N ((mk' M).comp f) ?_
intro x hx
refine QuotientGroup.eq.2 ?_
rw [mul_one, Subgroup.inv_mem_iff]
exact h hx
#align quotient_group.map QuotientGroup.map
#align quotient_add_group.map QuotientAddGroup.map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mk (M : Subgroup H) [M.Normal] (f : G →* H) (h : N ≤ M.comap f) (x : G) :
map N M f h ↑x = ↑(f x) :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.map_coe QuotientGroup.map_mk
#align quotient_add_group.map_coe QuotientAddGroup.map_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mk' (M : Subgroup H) [M.Normal] (f : G →* H) (h : N ≤ M.comap f) (x : G) :
map N M f h (mk' _ x) = ↑(f x) :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.map_mk' QuotientGroup.map_mk'
#align quotient_add_group.map_mk' QuotientAddGroup.map_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem map_id_apply (h : N ≤ Subgroup.comap (MonoidHom.id _) N := (Subgroup.comap_id N).le) (x) :
map N N (MonoidHom.id _) h x = x :=
induction_on' x fun _x => rfl
#align quotient_group.map_id_apply QuotientGroup.map_id_apply
#align quotient_add_group.map_id_apply QuotientAddGroup.map_id_apply
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id (h : N ≤ Subgroup.comap (MonoidHom.id _) N := (Subgroup.comap_id N).le) :
map N N (MonoidHom.id _) h = MonoidHom.id _ :=
MonoidHom.ext (map_id_apply N h)
#align quotient_group.map_id QuotientGroup.map_id
#align quotient_add_group.map_id QuotientAddGroup.map_id
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_map {I : Type*} [Group I] (M : Subgroup H) (O : Subgroup I) [M.Normal] [O.Normal]
(f : G →* H) (g : H →* I) (hf : N ≤ Subgroup.comap f M) (hg : M ≤ Subgroup.comap g O)
(hgf : N ≤ Subgroup.comap (g.comp f) O :=
hf.trans ((Subgroup.comap_mono hg).trans_eq (Subgroup.comap_comap _ _ _)))
(x : G ⧸ N) : map M O g hg (map N M f hf x) = map N O (g.comp f) hgf x := by
refine induction_on' x fun x => ?_
simp only [map_mk, MonoidHom.comp_apply]
#align quotient_group.map_map QuotientGroup.map_map
#align quotient_add_group.map_map QuotientAddGroup.map_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp_map {I : Type*} [Group I] (M : Subgroup H) (O : Subgroup I) [M.Normal] [O.Normal]
(f : G →* H) (g : H →* I) (hf : N ≤ Subgroup.comap f M) (hg : M ≤ Subgroup.comap g O)
(hgf : N ≤ Subgroup.comap (g.comp f) O :=
hf.trans ((Subgroup.comap_mono hg).trans_eq (Subgroup.comap_comap _ _ _))) :
(map M O g hg).comp (map N M f hf) = map N O (g.comp f) hgf :=
MonoidHom.ext (map_map N M O f g hf hg hgf)
#align quotient_group.map_comp_map QuotientGroup.map_comp_map
#align quotient_add_group.map_comp_map QuotientAddGroup.map_comp_map
section Pointwise
open Set
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma image_coe : ((↑) : G → Q) '' N = 1 :=
congr_arg ((↑) : Subgroup Q → Set Q) <| map_mk'_self N
@[to_additive]
lemma preimage_image_coe (s : Set G) : ((↑) : G → Q) ⁻¹' ((↑) '' s) = N * s := by
ext a
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, hb, h⟩
refine ⟨a / b, (QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).1 ?_, b, hb, div_mul_cancel _ _⟩
simp only [h, QuotientGroup.mk_div, div_self']
· rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
refine ⟨b, hb, ?_⟩
simpa only [QuotientGroup.mk_mul, self_eq_mul_left, QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff]
@[to_additive]
lemma image_coe_inj {s t : Set G} : ((↑) : G → Q) '' s = ((↑) : G → Q) '' t ↔ ↑N * s = N * t := by
simp_rw [← preimage_image_coe]
exact QuotientGroup.mk_surjective.preimage_injective.eq_iff.symm
end Pointwise
section congr
variable (G' : Subgroup G) (H' : Subgroup H) [Subgroup.Normal G'] [Subgroup.Normal H']
/-- `QuotientGroup.congr` lifts the isomorphism `e : G ≃ H` to `G ⧸ G' ≃ H ⧸ H'`,
given that `e` maps `G` to `H`. -/
@[to_additive "`QuotientAddGroup.congr` lifts the isomorphism `e : G ≃ H` to `G ⧸ G' ≃ H ⧸ H'`,
given that `e` maps `G` to `H`."]
def congr (e : G ≃* H) (he : G'.map e = H') : G ⧸ G' ≃* H ⧸ H' :=
{ map G' H' e (he ▸ G'.le_comap_map (e : G →* H)) with
toFun := map G' H' e (he ▸ G'.le_comap_map (e : G →* H))
invFun := map H' G' e.symm (he ▸ (G'.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm e).le)
left_inv := fun x => by
rw [map_map G' H' G' e e.symm (he ▸ G'.le_comap_map (e : G →* H))
(he ▸ (G'.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm e).le)]
simp only [map_map, ← MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_trans, MulEquiv.self_trans_symm,
MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_refl, map_id_apply]
right_inv := fun x => by
rw [map_map H' G' H' e.symm e (he ▸ (G'.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm e).le)
(he ▸ G'.le_comap_map (e : G →* H)) ]
simp only [← MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_trans, MulEquiv.symm_trans_self,
MulEquiv.coe_monoidHom_refl, map_id_apply] }
#align quotient_group.congr QuotientGroup.congr
#align quotient_add_group.congr QuotientAddGroup.congr
@[simp]
theorem congr_mk (e : G ≃* H) (he : G'.map ↑e = H') (x) : congr G' H' e he (mk x) = e x :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.congr_mk QuotientGroup.congr_mk
theorem congr_mk' (e : G ≃* H) (he : G'.map ↑e = H') (x) :
congr G' H' e he (mk' G' x) = mk' H' (e x) :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.congr_mk' QuotientGroup.congr_mk'
@[simp]
theorem congr_apply (e : G ≃* H) (he : G'.map ↑e = H') (x : G) :
congr G' H' e he x = mk' H' (e x) :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.congr_apply QuotientGroup.congr_apply
@[simp]
theorem congr_refl (he : G'.map (MulEquiv.refl G : G →* G) = G' := Subgroup.map_id G') :
congr G' G' (MulEquiv.refl G) he = MulEquiv.refl (G ⧸ G') := by
ext ⟨x⟩
rfl
#align quotient_group.congr_refl QuotientGroup.congr_refl
@[simp]
theorem congr_symm (e : G ≃* H) (he : G'.map ↑e = H') :
(congr G' H' e he).symm = congr H' G' e.symm ((Subgroup.map_symm_eq_iff_map_eq _).mpr he) :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.congr_symm QuotientGroup.congr_symm
end congr
variable (φ : G →* H)
open MonoidHom
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain. -/
@[to_additive "The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain."]
def kerLift : G ⧸ ker φ →* H :=
lift _ φ fun _g => φ.mem_ker.mp
#align quotient_group.ker_lift QuotientGroup.kerLift
#align quotient_add_group.ker_lift QuotientAddGroup.kerLift
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem kerLift_mk (g : G) : (kerLift φ) g = φ g :=
lift_mk _ _ _
#align quotient_group.ker_lift_mk QuotientGroup.kerLift_mk
#align quotient_add_group.ker_lift_mk QuotientAddGroup.kerLift_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem kerLift_mk' (g : G) : (kerLift φ) (mk g) = φ g :=
lift_mk' _ _ _
#align quotient_group.ker_lift_mk' QuotientGroup.kerLift_mk'
#align quotient_add_group.ker_lift_mk' QuotientAddGroup.kerLift_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem kerLift_injective : Injective (kerLift φ) := fun a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂' a b fun a b (h : φ a = φ b) =>
Quotient.sound' <| by rw [leftRel_apply, mem_ker, φ.map_mul, ← h, φ.map_inv, inv_mul_self]
#align quotient_group.ker_lift_injective QuotientGroup.kerLift_injective
#align quotient_add_group.ker_lift_injective QuotientAddGroup.kerLift_injective
-- Note that `ker φ` isn't definitionally `ker (φ.rangeRestrict)`
-- so there is a bit of annoying code duplication here
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the range. -/
@[to_additive "The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the range."]
def rangeKerLift : G ⧸ ker φ →* φ.range :=
lift _ φ.rangeRestrict fun g hg => (mem_ker _).mp <| by rwa [ker_rangeRestrict]
#align quotient_group.range_ker_lift QuotientGroup.rangeKerLift
#align quotient_add_group.range_ker_lift QuotientAddGroup.rangeKerLift
@[to_additive]
theorem rangeKerLift_injective : Injective (rangeKerLift φ) := fun a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂' a b fun a b (h : φ.rangeRestrict a = φ.rangeRestrict b) =>
Quotient.sound' <| by
rw [leftRel_apply, ← ker_rangeRestrict, mem_ker, φ.rangeRestrict.map_mul, ← h,
φ.rangeRestrict.map_inv, inv_mul_self]
#align quotient_group.range_ker_lift_injective QuotientGroup.rangeKerLift_injective
#align quotient_add_group.range_ker_lift_injective QuotientAddGroup.rangeKerLift_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem rangeKerLift_surjective : Surjective (rangeKerLift φ) := by
rintro ⟨_, g, rfl⟩
use mk g
rfl
#align quotient_group.range_ker_lift_surjective QuotientGroup.rangeKerLift_surjective
#align quotient_add_group.range_ker_lift_surjective QuotientAddGroup.rangeKerLift_surjective
/-- **Noether's first isomorphism theorem** (a definition): the canonical isomorphism between
`G/(ker φ)` to `range φ`. -/
@[to_additive "The first isomorphism theorem (a definition): the canonical isomorphism between
`G/(ker φ)` to `range φ`."]
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRange : G ⧸ ker φ ≃* range φ :=
MulEquiv.ofBijective (rangeKerLift φ) ⟨rangeKerLift_injective φ, rangeKerLift_surjective φ⟩
#align quotient_group.quotient_ker_equiv_range QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivRange
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_ker_equiv_range QuotientAddGroup.quotientKerEquivRange
/-- The canonical isomorphism `G/(ker φ) ≃* H` induced by a homomorphism `φ : G →* H`
with a right inverse `ψ : H → G`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The canonical isomorphism `G/(ker φ) ≃+ H` induced by a homomorphism
`φ : G →+ H` with a right inverse `ψ : H → G`."]
def quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (ψ : H → G) (hφ : RightInverse ψ φ) : G ⧸ ker φ ≃* H :=
{ kerLift φ with
toFun := kerLift φ
invFun := mk ∘ ψ
left_inv := fun x => kerLift_injective φ (by rw [Function.comp_apply, kerLift_mk', hφ])
right_inv := hφ }
#align quotient_group.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse QuotientAddGroup.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse
/-- The canonical isomorphism `G/⊥ ≃* G`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) "The canonical isomorphism `G/⊥ ≃+ G`."]
def quotientBot : G ⧸ (⊥ : Subgroup G) ≃* G :=
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (MonoidHom.id G) id fun _x => rfl
#align quotient_group.quotient_bot QuotientGroup.quotientBot
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_bot QuotientAddGroup.quotientBot
/-- The canonical isomorphism `G/(ker φ) ≃* H` induced by a surjection `φ : G →* H`.
For a `computable` version, see `QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`.
-/
@[to_additive "The canonical isomorphism `G/(ker φ) ≃+ H` induced by a surjection `φ : G →+ H`.
For a `computable` version, see `QuotientAddGroup.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`."]
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (hφ : Surjective φ) : G ⧸ ker φ ≃* H :=
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse φ _ hφ.hasRightInverse.choose_spec
#align quotient_group.quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective QuotientAddGroup.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective
/-- If two normal subgroups `M` and `N` of `G` are the same, their quotient groups are
isomorphic. -/
@[to_additive "If two normal subgroups `M` and `N` of `G` are the same, their quotient groups are
isomorphic."]
def quotientMulEquivOfEq {M N : Subgroup G} [M.Normal] [N.Normal] (h : M = N) : G ⧸ M ≃* G ⧸ N :=
{ Subgroup.quotientEquivOfEq h with
map_mul' := fun q r => Quotient.inductionOn₂' q r fun _g _h => rfl }
#align quotient_group.quotient_mul_equiv_of_eq QuotientGroup.quotientMulEquivOfEq
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_add_equiv_of_eq QuotientAddGroup.quotientAddEquivOfEq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quotientMulEquivOfEq_mk {M N : Subgroup G} [M.Normal] [N.Normal] (h : M = N) (x : G) :
QuotientGroup.quotientMulEquivOfEq h (QuotientGroup.mk x) = QuotientGroup.mk x :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.quotient_mul_equiv_of_eq_mk QuotientGroup.quotientMulEquivOfEq_mk
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_add_equiv_of_eq_mk QuotientAddGroup.quotientAddEquivOfEq_mk
/-- Let `A', A, B', B` be subgroups of `G`. If `A' ≤ B'` and `A ≤ B`,
then there is a map `A / (A' ⊓ A) →* B / (B' ⊓ B)` induced by the inclusions. -/
@[to_additive "Let `A', A, B', B` be subgroups of `G`. If `A' ≤ B'` and `A ≤ B`, then there is a map
`A / (A' ⊓ A) →+ B / (B' ⊓ B)` induced by the inclusions."]
def quotientMapSubgroupOfOfLe {A' A B' B : Subgroup G} [_hAN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal]
[_hBN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] (h' : A' ≤ B') (h : A ≤ B) :
A ⧸ A'.subgroupOf A →* B ⧸ B'.subgroupOf B :=
map _ _ (Subgroup.inclusion h) <| Subgroup.comap_mono h'
#align quotient_group.quotient_map_subgroup_of_of_le QuotientGroup.quotientMapSubgroupOfOfLe
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_map_add_subgroup_of_of_le QuotientAddGroup.quotientMapAddSubgroupOfOfLe
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quotientMapSubgroupOfOfLe_mk {A' A B' B : Subgroup G} [_hAN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal]
[_hBN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] (h' : A' ≤ B') (h : A ≤ B) (x : A) :
quotientMapSubgroupOfOfLe h' h x = ↑(Subgroup.inclusion h x : B) :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.quotient_map_subgroup_of_of_le_coe QuotientGroup.quotientMapSubgroupOfOfLe_mk
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_map_add_subgroup_of_of_le_coe QuotientAddGroup.quotientMapAddSubgroupOfOfLe_mk
/-- Let `A', A, B', B` be subgroups of `G`.
If `A' = B'` and `A = B`, then the quotients `A / (A' ⊓ A)` and `B / (B' ⊓ B)` are isomorphic.
Applying this equiv is nicer than rewriting along the equalities, since the type of
`(A'.subgroupOf A : Subgroup A)` depends on `A`.
-/
@[to_additive "Let `A', A, B', B` be subgroups of `G`. If `A' = B'` and `A = B`, then the quotients
`A / (A' ⊓ A)` and `B / (B' ⊓ B)` are isomorphic. Applying this equiv is nicer than rewriting along
the equalities, since the type of `(A'.addSubgroupOf A : AddSubgroup A)` depends on on `A`. "]
def equivQuotientSubgroupOfOfEq {A' A B' B : Subgroup G} [hAN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal]
[hBN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] (h' : A' = B') (h : A = B) :
A ⧸ A'.subgroupOf A ≃* B ⧸ B'.subgroupOf B :=
MonoidHom.toMulEquiv (quotientMapSubgroupOfOfLe h'.le h.le) (quotientMapSubgroupOfOfLe h'.ge h.ge)
(by ext ⟨x, hx⟩; rfl)
(by ext ⟨x, hx⟩; rfl)
#align quotient_group.equiv_quotient_subgroup_of_of_eq QuotientGroup.equivQuotientSubgroupOfOfEq
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_quotient_add_subgroup_of_of_eq QuotientAddGroup.equivQuotientAddSubgroupOfOfEq
section ZPow
variable {A B C : Type u} [CommGroup A] [CommGroup B] [CommGroup C]
variable (f : A →* B) (g : B →* A) (e : A ≃* B) (d : B ≃* C) (n : ℤ)
/-- The map of quotients by powers of an integer induced by a group homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The map of quotients by multiples of an integer induced by an additive group
homomorphism."]
def homQuotientZPowOfHom :
A ⧸ (zpowGroupHom n : A →* A).range →* B ⧸ (zpowGroupHom n : B →* B).range :=
lift _ ((mk' _).comp f) fun g ⟨h, (hg : h ^ n = g)⟩ =>
(eq_one_iff _).mpr ⟨f h, by
simp only [← hg, map_zpow, zpowGroupHom_apply]⟩
#align quotient_group.hom_quotient_zpow_of_hom QuotientGroup.homQuotientZPowOfHom
#align quotient_add_group.hom_quotient_zsmul_of_hom QuotientAddGroup.homQuotientZSMulOfHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem homQuotientZPowOfHom_id : homQuotientZPowOfHom (MonoidHom.id A) n = MonoidHom.id _ :=
monoidHom_ext _ rfl
#align quotient_group.hom_quotient_zpow_of_hom_id QuotientGroup.homQuotientZPowOfHom_id
#align quotient_add_group.hom_quotient_zsmul_of_hom_id QuotientAddGroup.homQuotientZSMulOfHom_id
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem homQuotientZPowOfHom_comp :
homQuotientZPowOfHom (f.comp g) n =
(homQuotientZPowOfHom f n).comp (homQuotientZPowOfHom g n) :=
monoidHom_ext _ rfl
#align quotient_group.hom_quotient_zpow_of_hom_comp QuotientGroup.homQuotientZPowOfHom_comp
#align quotient_add_group.hom_quotient_zsmul_of_hom_comp QuotientAddGroup.homQuotientZSMulOfHom_comp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem homQuotientZPowOfHom_comp_of_rightInverse (i : Function.RightInverse g f) :
(homQuotientZPowOfHom f n).comp (homQuotientZPowOfHom g n) = MonoidHom.id _ :=
monoidHom_ext _ <| MonoidHom.ext fun x => congrArg _ <| i x
#align quotient_group.hom_quotient_zpow_of_hom_comp_of_right_inverse QuotientGroup.homQuotientZPowOfHom_comp_of_rightInverse
#align quotient_add_group.hom_quotient_zsmul_of_hom_comp_of_right_inverse QuotientAddGroup.homQuotientZSMulOfHom_comp_of_rightInverse
/-- The equivalence of quotients by powers of an integer induced by a group isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence of quotients by multiples of an integer induced by an additive group
isomorphism."]
def equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv :
A ⧸ (zpowGroupHom n : A →* A).range ≃* B ⧸ (zpowGroupHom n : B →* B).range :=
MonoidHom.toMulEquiv _ _
(homQuotientZPowOfHom_comp_of_rightInverse (e.symm : B →* A) (e : A →* B) n e.left_inv)
(homQuotientZPowOfHom_comp_of_rightInverse (e : A →* B) (e.symm : B →* A) n e.right_inv)
-- Porting note: had to explicitly coerce the `MulEquiv`s to `MonoidHom`s
#align quotient_group.equiv_quotient_zpow_of_equiv QuotientGroup.equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_quotient_zsmul_of_equiv QuotientAddGroup.equivQuotientZSMulOfEquiv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv_refl :
MulEquiv.refl (A ⧸ (zpowGroupHom n : A →* A).range) =
equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv (MulEquiv.refl A) n := by
ext x
rw [← Quotient.out_eq' x]
rfl
#align quotient_group.equiv_quotient_zpow_of_equiv_refl QuotientGroup.equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv_refl
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_quotient_zsmul_of_equiv_refl QuotientAddGroup.equivQuotientZSMulOfEquiv_refl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv_symm :
(equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv e n).symm = equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv e.symm n :=
rfl
#align quotient_group.equiv_quotient_zpow_of_equiv_symm QuotientGroup.equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv_symm
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_quotient_zsmul_of_equiv_symm QuotientAddGroup.equivQuotientZSMulOfEquiv_symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv_trans :
(equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv e n).trans (equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv d n) =
equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv (e.trans d) n := by
ext x
rw [← Quotient.out_eq' x]
rfl
#align quotient_group.equiv_quotient_zpow_of_equiv_trans QuotientGroup.equivQuotientZPowOfEquiv_trans
#align quotient_add_group.equiv_quotient_zsmul_of_equiv_trans QuotientAddGroup.equivQuotientZSMulOfEquiv_trans
end ZPow
section SndIsomorphismThm
open Subgroup
/-- **Noether's second isomorphism theorem**: given two subgroups `H` and `N` of a group `G`, where
`N` is normal, defines an isomorphism between `H/(H ∩ N)` and `(HN)/N`. -/
@[to_additive "The second isomorphism theorem: given two subgroups `H` and `N` of a group `G`, where
`N` is normal, defines an isomorphism between `H/(H ∩ N)` and `(H + N)/N`"]
noncomputable def quotientInfEquivProdNormalQuotient (H N : Subgroup G) [N.Normal] :
H ⧸ N.subgroupOf H ≃* _ ⧸ N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N) :=
let
φ :-- φ is the natural homomorphism H →* (HN)/N.
H →*
_ ⧸ N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N) :=
(mk' <| N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).comp (inclusion le_sup_left)
have φ_surjective : Surjective φ := fun x =>
x.inductionOn' <| by
rintro ⟨y, hy : y ∈ (H ⊔ N)⟩;
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe] at hy
rw [mul_normal H N] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨h, hh, n, hn, rfl⟩
use ⟨h, hh⟩
let _ : Setoid ↑(H ⊔ N) :=
(@leftRel ↑(H ⊔ N) (H ⊔ N : Subgroup G).toGroup (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)))
-- Porting note: Lean couldn't find this automatically
refine Quotient.eq.mpr ?_
change Setoid.r _ _
rw [leftRel_apply]
change h⁻¹ * (h * n) ∈ N
rwa [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_self, one_mul]
(quotientMulEquivOfEq (by simp [φ, ← comap_ker])).trans
(quotientKerEquivOfSurjective φ φ_surjective)
#align quotient_group.quotient_inf_equiv_prod_normal_quotient QuotientGroup.quotientInfEquivProdNormalQuotient
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_inf_equiv_sum_normal_quotient QuotientAddGroup.quotientInfEquivSumNormalQuotient
end SndIsomorphismThm
section ThirdIsoThm
variable (M : Subgroup G) [nM : M.Normal]
@[to_additive]
instance map_normal : (M.map (QuotientGroup.mk' N)).Normal :=
nM.map _ mk_surjective
#align quotient_group.map_normal QuotientGroup.map_normal
#align quotient_add_group.map_normal QuotientAddGroup.map_normal
variable (h : N ≤ M)
/-- The map from the third isomorphism theorem for groups: `(G / N) / (M / N) → G / M`. -/
@[to_additive "The map from the third isomorphism theorem for additive groups:
`(A / N) / (M / N) → A / M`."]
def quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux : (G ⧸ N) ⧸ M.map (mk' N) →* G ⧸ M :=
lift (M.map (mk' N)) (map N M (MonoidHom.id G) h)
(by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ker, map_mk' N M _ _ x]
exact (QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr hx)
#align quotient_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient_aux QuotientGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient_aux QuotientAddGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux_mk (x : G ⧸ N) :
quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux N M h x = QuotientGroup.map N M (MonoidHom.id G) h x :=
QuotientGroup.lift_mk' _ _ x
#align quotient_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient_aux_coe QuotientGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux_mk
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient_aux_coe QuotientAddGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux_mk_mk (x : G) :
quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux N M h (x : G ⧸ N) = x :=
QuotientGroup.lift_mk' (M.map (mk' N)) _ x
#align quotient_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient_aux_coe_coe QuotientGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux_mk_mk
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient_aux_coe_coe QuotientAddGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux_mk_mk
/-- **Noether's third isomorphism theorem** for groups: `(G / N) / (M / N) ≃* G / M`. -/
@[to_additive
"**Noether's third isomorphism theorem** for additive groups: `(A / N) / (M / N) ≃+ A / M`."]
def quotientQuotientEquivQuotient : (G ⧸ N) ⧸ M.map (QuotientGroup.mk' N) ≃* G ⧸ M :=
MonoidHom.toMulEquiv (quotientQuotientEquivQuotientAux N M h)
(QuotientGroup.map _ _ (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.le_comap_map _ _))
(by ext; simp)
(by ext; simp)
#align quotient_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient QuotientGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotient
#align quotient_add_group.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient QuotientAddGroup.quotientQuotientEquivQuotient
end ThirdIsoThm
section trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem subsingleton_quotient_top : Subsingleton (G ⧸ (⊤ : Subgroup G)) := by
dsimp [HasQuotient.Quotient, QuotientGroup.instHasQuotientSubgroup, Quotient]
rw [leftRel_eq]
exact Trunc.instSubsingletonTrunc
#align quotient_group.subsingleton_quotient_top QuotientGroup.subsingleton_quotient_top
#align quotient_add_group.subsingleton_quotient_top QuotientAddGroup.subsingleton_quotient_top
/-- If the quotient by a subgroup gives a singleton then the subgroup is the whole group. -/
@[to_additive "If the quotient by an additive subgroup gives a singleton then the additive subgroup
is the whole additive group."]
theorem subgroup_eq_top_of_subsingleton (H : Subgroup G) (h : Subsingleton (G ⧸ H)) : H = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun x _ => by
have this : 1⁻¹ * x ∈ H := QuotientGroup.eq.1 (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
rwa [inv_one, one_mul] at this
#align quotient_group.subgroup_eq_top_of_subsingleton QuotientGroup.subgroup_eq_top_of_subsingleton
#align quotient_add_group.add_subgroup_eq_top_of_subsingleton QuotientAddGroup.addSubgroup_eq_top_of_subsingleton
end trivial
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/QuotientGroup.lean | 724 | 729 | theorem comap_comap_center {H₁ : Subgroup G} [H₁.Normal] {H₂ : Subgroup (G ⧸ H₁)} [H₂.Normal] :
((Subgroup.center ((G ⧸ H₁) ⧸ H₂)).comap (mk' H₂)).comap (mk' H₁) =
(Subgroup.center (G ⧸ H₂.comap (mk' H₁))).comap (mk' (H₂.comap (mk' H₁))) := by |
ext x
simp only [mk'_apply, Subgroup.mem_comap, Subgroup.mem_center_iff, forall_mk, ← mk_mul,
eq_iff_div_mem, mk_div]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
#align_import group_theory.perm.fin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e1c1263b6a25eb90bf16e80d8f47a657e403c4c"
/-!
# Permutations of `Fin n`
-/
open Equiv
/-- Permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` are equivalent to fixing a single
`Fin (n + 1)` and permuting the remaining with a `Perm (Fin n)`.
The fixed `Fin (n + 1)` is swapped with `0`. -/
def Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin {n : ℕ} : Perm (Fin n.succ) ≃ Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n) :=
((Equiv.permCongr <| finSuccEquiv n).trans Equiv.Perm.decomposeOption).trans
(Equiv.prodCongr (finSuccEquiv n).symm (Equiv.refl _))
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, Equiv.refl _) = swap 0 p := by
simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Equiv.permCongr_def]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_of_refl Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, 1) = swap 0 p :=
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl p
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_of_one Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma.
See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12232 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 0 = p := by simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_zero Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin n)) (p : Fin (n + 1))
(x : Fin n) : Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) x.succ = swap 0 p (e x).succ := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p
· simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· intro i
by_cases h : i = e x
· simp [h, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· simp [h, Fin.succ_ne_zero, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map,
swap_apply_def, Ne.symm h]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_succ Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma.
See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12232 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin (n + 1))) (p : Fin (n + 2)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 1 = swap 0 p (e 0).succ := by
rw [← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ e p 0]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_one Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Perm.sign (Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e)) = ite (p = 0) 1 (-1) * Perm.sign e := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p <;> simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Fin.succ_ne_zero]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin.symm_sign Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign
/-- The set of all permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` can be constructed by augmenting the set of
permutations of `Fin n` by each element of `Fin (n + 1)` in turn. -/
theorem Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ {n : ℕ} :
@Finset.univ (Perm <| Fin n.succ) _ =
(Finset.univ : Finset <| Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n)).map
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm.toEmbedding :=
(Finset.univ_map_equiv_to_embedding _).symm
#align finset.univ_perm_fin_succ Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ
section CycleRange
/-! ### `cycleRange` section
Define the permutations `Fin.cycleRange i`, the cycle `(0 1 2 ... i)`.
-/
open Equiv.Perm
-- Porting note: renamed from finRotate_succ because there is already a theorem with that name
theorem finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin {n : ℕ} :
finRotate n.succ = decomposeFin.symm (1, finRotate n) := by
ext i
cases n; · simp
refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· simp
rw [coe_finRotate, decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ, if_congr i.succ_eq_last_succ rfl rfl]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· rw [Fin.val_succ, Function.Injective.map_swap Fin.val_injective, Fin.val_succ, coe_finRotate,
if_neg h, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (Nat.succ_ne_zero _) (Nat.succ_succ_ne_one _)]
#align fin_rotate_succ finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin
@[simp]
theorem sign_finRotate (n : ℕ) : Perm.sign (finRotate (n + 1)) = (-1) ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin]
simp [ih, pow_succ]
#align sign_fin_rotate sign_finRotate
@[simp]
theorem support_finRotate {n : ℕ} : support (finRotate (n + 2)) = Finset.univ := by
ext
simp
#align support_fin_rotate support_finRotate
theorem support_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : support (finRotate n) = Finset.univ := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, support_finRotate]
#align support_fin_rotate_of_le support_finRotate_of_le
theorem isCycle_finRotate {n : ℕ} : IsCycle (finRotate (n + 2)) := by
refine ⟨0, by simp, fun x hx' => ⟨x, ?_⟩⟩
clear hx'
cases' x with x hx
rw [zpow_natCast, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_mk]
induction' x with x ih; · rfl
rw [pow_succ', Perm.mul_apply, coe_finRotate_of_ne_last, ih (lt_trans x.lt_succ_self hx)]
rw [Ne, Fin.ext_iff, ih (lt_trans x.lt_succ_self hx), Fin.val_last]
exact ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hx)
#align is_cycle_fin_rotate isCycle_finRotate
theorem isCycle_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : IsCycle (finRotate n) := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm]
exact isCycle_finRotate
#align is_cycle_fin_rotate_of_le isCycle_finRotate_of_le
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_finRotate {n : ℕ} : cycleType (finRotate (n + 2)) = {n + 2} := by
rw [isCycle_finRotate.cycleType, support_finRotate, ← Fintype.card, Fintype.card_fin]
rfl
#align cycle_type_fin_rotate cycleType_finRotate
theorem cycleType_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : cycleType (finRotate n) = {n} := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, cycleType_finRotate]
#align cycle_type_fin_rotate_of_le cycleType_finRotate_of_le
namespace Fin
/-- `Fin.cycleRange i` is the cycle `(0 1 2 ... i)` leaving `(i+1 ... (n-1))` unchanged. -/
def cycleRange {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : Perm (Fin n) :=
(finRotate (i + 1)).extendDomain
(Equiv.ofLeftInverse' (Fin.castLEEmb (Nat.succ_le_of_lt i.is_lt)) (↑)
(by
intro x
ext
simp))
#align fin.cycle_range Fin.cycleRange
theorem cycleRange_of_gt {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n.succ} (h : i < j) : cycleRange i j = j := by
rw [cycleRange, ofLeftInverse'_eq_ofInjective,
← Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_eq_ofInjective, ← viaFintypeEmbedding,
viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_not_mem_range]
simpa
#align fin.cycle_range_of_gt Fin.cycleRange_of_gt
theorem cycleRange_of_le {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n.succ} (h : j ≤ i) :
cycleRange i j = if j = i then 0 else j + 1 := by
cases n
· exact Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) _ _ --Porting note; was `simp`
have : j = (Fin.castLE (Nat.succ_le_of_lt i.is_lt))
⟨j, lt_of_le_of_lt h (Nat.lt_succ_self i)⟩ := by simp
ext
erw [this, cycleRange, ofLeftInverse'_eq_ofInjective, ←
Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_eq_ofInjective, ← viaFintypeEmbedding,
viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_image, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk,
coe_castLE, coe_finRotate]
simp only [Fin.ext_iff, val_last, val_mk, val_zero, Fin.eta, castLE_mk]
split_ifs with heq
· rfl
· rw [Fin.val_add_one_of_lt]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_ne h (mt (congr_arg _) heq)) (le_last i)
#align fin.cycle_range_of_le Fin.cycleRange_of_le
theorem coe_cycleRange_of_le {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n.succ} (h : j ≤ i) :
(cycleRange i j : ℕ) = if j = i then 0 else (j : ℕ) + 1 := by
rw [cycleRange_of_le h]
split_ifs with h'
· rfl
exact
val_add_one_of_lt
(calc
(j : ℕ) < i := Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val.mp (lt_of_le_of_ne h h')
_ ≤ n := Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp i.2)
#align fin.coe_cycle_range_of_le Fin.coe_cycleRange_of_le
theorem cycleRange_of_lt {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n.succ} (h : j < i) : cycleRange i j = j + 1 := by
rw [cycleRange_of_le h.le, if_neg h.ne]
#align fin.cycle_range_of_lt Fin.cycleRange_of_lt
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Fin.lean | 209 | 210 | theorem coe_cycleRange_of_lt {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n.succ} (h : j < i) :
(cycleRange i j : ℕ) = j + 1 := by | rw [coe_cycleRange_of_le h.le, if_neg h.ne]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3fb84046afd187b710170887195d50bada934ee"
/-!
# The derivative of a linear equivalence
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
continuous linear equivalences.
We also prove the usual formula for the derivative of the inverse function, assuming it exists.
The inverse function theorem is in `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/FDeriv.lean`.
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter Asymptotics ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_strict_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAtFilter
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.fderivWithin hxs
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiable
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_on ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H
rwa [← Function.comp.assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← differentiableWithinAt_univ,
iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
rw [DifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn]
simp only [iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
rw [← differentiableOn_univ, ← differentiableOn_univ]
exact iso.comp_differentiableOn_iff
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H⟩
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f := by
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, iso.symm_comp_self]
rfl
have B : f' = (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
rw [A, B]
exact iso.symm.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H⟩
convert iso.symm.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H using 1 <;>
ext z <;> apply (iso.symm_apply_apply _).symm
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x := by
rw [← iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· rw [fderiv.comp_fderivWithin x iso.differentiableAt h hxs, iso.fderiv]
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x := mt iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ]
exact iso.comp_fderivWithin uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv
lemma _root_.fderivWithin_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G))
(hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) s x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
change fderivWithin 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) s x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hs]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) (x : E) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
change fderiv 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp' (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) =
fun x ↦ (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
ext x : 1
exact fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp L f x
theorem comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.differentiableWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 ((f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.differentiableWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (iso x) := by
simp only [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff,
preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableOn_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun H y hy => ?_, fun H y hy => iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.2 (H _ hy)⟩
rw [← iso.apply_symm_apply y, ← comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
apply H
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiable_iff {f : F → G} :
Differentiable 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [← differentiableOn_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.hasFDerivWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
have A : f = (f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm := by
rw [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm]
rfl
have B : f' = (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)).comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
rw [A, B]
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.hasFDerivWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) f' (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc,
iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff', preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_right_fderivWithin {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E}
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ⁻¹' s) x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 f s (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x)
· exact (iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff.2 h.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x := by
intro h'
exact h (iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h')
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin
theorem comp_right_fderiv {f : F → G} {x : E} :
fderiv 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x = (fderiv 𝕜 f (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ, ← iso.comp_right_fderivWithin, preimage_univ]
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderiv
end ContinuousLinearEquiv
namespace LinearIsometryEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear isometry equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasStrictFDerivAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.has_strict_fderiv_at LinearIsometryEquiv.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivWithinAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.has_fderiv_within_at LinearIsometryEquiv.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.has_fderiv_at LinearIsometryEquiv.hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable_at LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable_within_at LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
#align linear_isometry_equiv.fderiv LinearIsometryEquiv.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).fderivWithin hxs
#align linear_isometry_equiv.fderiv_within LinearIsometryEquiv.fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiable
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
#align linear_isometry_equiv.differentiable_on LinearIsometryEquiv.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableOn_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_on_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiable_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_differentiable_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff' LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_fderivWithin hxs
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_fderiv_within LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderivWithin
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_fderiv
#align linear_isometry_equiv.comp_fderiv LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderiv
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Equiv.lean | 378 | 381 | theorem comp_fderiv' {f : G → E} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) = fun x ↦ (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by |
ext x : 1
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderiv iso
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Michael Howes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Finiteness
#align_import group_theory.abelianization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
/-!
# The abelianization of a group
This file defines the commutator and the abelianization of a group. It furthermore prepares for the
result that the abelianization is left adjoint to the forgetful functor from abelian groups to
groups, which can be found in `Algebra/Category/Group/Adjunctions`.
## Main definitions
* `commutator`: defines the commutator of a group `G` as a subgroup of `G`.
* `Abelianization`: defines the abelianization of a group `G` as the quotient of a group by its
commutator subgroup.
* `Abelianization.map`: lifts a group homomorphism to a homomorphism between the abelianizations
* `MulEquiv.abelianizationCongr`: Equivalent groups have equivalent abelianizations
-/
universe u v w
-- Let G be a group.
variable (G : Type u) [Group G]
open Subgroup (centralizer)
/-- The commutator subgroup of a group G is the normal subgroup
generated by the commutators [p,q]=`p*q*p⁻¹*q⁻¹`. -/
def commutator : Subgroup G := ⁅(⊤ : Subgroup G), ⊤⁆
#align commutator commutator
-- Porting note: this instance should come from `deriving Subgroup.Normal`
instance : Subgroup.Normal (commutator G) := Subgroup.commutator_normal ⊤ ⊤
theorem commutator_def : commutator G = ⁅(⊤ : Subgroup G), ⊤⁆ :=
rfl
#align commutator_def commutator_def
theorem commutator_eq_closure : commutator G = Subgroup.closure (commutatorSet G) := by
simp [commutator, Subgroup.commutator_def, commutatorSet]
#align commutator_eq_closure commutator_eq_closure
theorem commutator_eq_normalClosure : commutator G = Subgroup.normalClosure (commutatorSet G) := by
simp [commutator, Subgroup.commutator_def', commutatorSet]
#align commutator_eq_normal_closure commutator_eq_normalClosure
instance commutator_characteristic : (commutator G).Characteristic :=
Subgroup.commutator_characteristic ⊤ ⊤
#align commutator_characteristic commutator_characteristic
instance [Finite (commutatorSet G)] : Group.FG (commutator G) := by
rw [commutator_eq_closure]
apply Group.closure_finite_fg
theorem rank_commutator_le_card [Finite (commutatorSet G)] :
Group.rank (commutator G) ≤ Nat.card (commutatorSet G) := by
rw [Subgroup.rank_congr (commutator_eq_closure G)]
apply Subgroup.rank_closure_finite_le_nat_card
#align rank_commutator_le_card rank_commutator_le_card
theorem commutator_centralizer_commutator_le_center :
⁅centralizer (commutator G : Set G), centralizer (commutator G)⁆ ≤ Subgroup.center G := by
rw [← Subgroup.centralizer_univ, ← Subgroup.coe_top, ←
Subgroup.commutator_eq_bot_iff_le_centralizer]
suffices ⁅⁅⊤, centralizer (commutator G : Set G)⁆, centralizer (commutator G : Set G)⁆ = ⊥ by
refine Subgroup.commutator_commutator_eq_bot_of_rotate ?_ this
rwa [Subgroup.commutator_comm (centralizer (commutator G : Set G))]
rw [Subgroup.commutator_comm, Subgroup.commutator_eq_bot_iff_le_centralizer]
exact Set.centralizer_subset (Subgroup.commutator_mono le_top le_top)
#align commutator_centralizer_commutator_le_center commutator_centralizer_commutator_le_center
/-- The abelianization of G is the quotient of G by its commutator subgroup. -/
def Abelianization : Type u :=
G ⧸ commutator G
#align abelianization Abelianization
namespace Abelianization
attribute [local instance] QuotientGroup.leftRel
instance commGroup : CommGroup (Abelianization G) :=
{ QuotientGroup.Quotient.group _ with
mul_comm := fun x y =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y fun a b =>
Quotient.sound' <|
QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply.mpr <|
Subgroup.subset_closure
⟨b⁻¹, Subgroup.mem_top b⁻¹, a⁻¹, Subgroup.mem_top a⁻¹, by group⟩ }
instance : Inhabited (Abelianization G) :=
⟨1⟩
instance [Unique G] : Unique (Abelianization G) := Quotient.instUniqueQuotient _
instance [Fintype G] [DecidablePred (· ∈ commutator G)] : Fintype (Abelianization G) :=
QuotientGroup.fintype (commutator G)
instance [Finite G] : Finite (Abelianization G) :=
Quotient.finite _
variable {G}
/-- `of` is the canonical projection from G to its abelianization. -/
def of : G →* Abelianization G where
toFun := QuotientGroup.mk
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align abelianization.of Abelianization.of
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_of (a : G) : Quot.mk _ a = of a :=
rfl
#align abelianization.mk_eq_of Abelianization.mk_eq_of
section lift
-- So far we have built Gᵃᵇ and proved it's an abelian group.
-- Furthermore we defined the canonical projection `of : G → Gᵃᵇ`
-- Let `A` be an abelian group and let `f` be a group homomorphism from `G` to `A`.
variable {A : Type v} [CommGroup A] (f : G →* A)
theorem commutator_subset_ker : commutator G ≤ f.ker := by
rw [commutator_eq_closure, Subgroup.closure_le]
rintro x ⟨p, q, rfl⟩
simp [MonoidHom.mem_ker, mul_right_comm (f p) (f q), commutatorElement_def]
#align abelianization.commutator_subset_ker Abelianization.commutator_subset_ker
/-- If `f : G → A` is a group homomorphism to an abelian group, then `lift f` is the unique map
from the abelianization of a `G` to `A` that factors through `f`. -/
def lift : (G →* A) ≃ (Abelianization G →* A) where
toFun f := QuotientGroup.lift _ f fun _ h => f.mem_ker.2 <| commutator_subset_ker _ h
invFun F := F.comp of
left_inv _ := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
right_inv _ := MonoidHom.ext fun x => QuotientGroup.induction_on x fun _ => rfl
#align abelianization.lift Abelianization.lift
@[simp]
theorem lift.of (x : G) : lift f (of x) = f x :=
rfl
#align abelianization.lift.of Abelianization.lift.of
theorem lift.unique (φ : Abelianization G →* A)
-- hφ : φ agrees with f on the image of G in Gᵃᵇ
(hφ : ∀ x : G, φ (Abelianization.of x) = f x)
{x : Abelianization G} : φ x = lift f x :=
QuotientGroup.induction_on x hφ
#align abelianization.lift.unique Abelianization.lift.unique
@[simp]
theorem lift_of : lift of = MonoidHom.id (Abelianization G) :=
lift.apply_symm_apply <| MonoidHom.id _
#align abelianization.lift_of Abelianization.lift_of
end lift
variable {A : Type v} [Monoid A]
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext (φ ψ : Abelianization G →* A) (h : φ.comp of = ψ.comp of) : φ = ψ :=
MonoidHom.ext fun x => QuotientGroup.induction_on x <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
#align abelianization.hom_ext Abelianization.hom_ext
section Map
variable {H : Type v} [Group H] (f : G →* H)
/-- The map operation of the `Abelianization` functor -/
def map : Abelianization G →* Abelianization H :=
lift (of.comp f)
#align abelianization.map Abelianization.map
/-- Use `map` as the preferred simp normal form. -/
@[simp] theorem lift_of_comp :
Abelianization.lift (Abelianization.of.comp f) = Abelianization.map f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_of (x : G) : map f (of x) = of (f x) :=
rfl
#align abelianization.map_of Abelianization.map_of
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (MonoidHom.id G) = MonoidHom.id (Abelianization G) :=
hom_ext _ _ rfl
#align abelianization.map_id Abelianization.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_comp {I : Type w} [Group I] (g : H →* I) : (map g).comp (map f) = map (g.comp f) :=
hom_ext _ _ rfl
#align abelianization.map_comp Abelianization.map_comp
@[simp]
theorem map_map_apply {I : Type w} [Group I] {g : H →* I} {x : Abelianization G} :
map g (map f x) = map (g.comp f) x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_comp _ _) x
#align abelianization.map_map_apply Abelianization.map_map_apply
end Map
end Abelianization
section AbelianizationCongr
-- Porting note: `[Group G]` should not be necessary here
variable {G} [Group G] {H : Type v} [Group H] (e : G ≃* H)
/-- Equivalent groups have equivalent abelianizations -/
def MulEquiv.abelianizationCongr : Abelianization G ≃* Abelianization H where
toFun := Abelianization.map e.toMonoidHom
invFun := Abelianization.map e.symm.toMonoidHom
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨a⟩
simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a⟩
simp
map_mul' := MonoidHom.map_mul _
#align mul_equiv.abelianization_congr MulEquiv.abelianizationCongr
@[simp]
theorem abelianizationCongr_of (x : G) :
e.abelianizationCongr (Abelianization.of x) = Abelianization.of (e x) :=
rfl
#align abelianization_congr_of abelianizationCongr_of
@[simp]
theorem abelianizationCongr_refl :
(MulEquiv.refl G).abelianizationCongr = MulEquiv.refl (Abelianization G) :=
MulEquiv.toMonoidHom_injective Abelianization.lift_of
#align abelianization_congr_refl abelianizationCongr_refl
@[simp]
theorem abelianizationCongr_symm : e.abelianizationCongr.symm = e.symm.abelianizationCongr :=
rfl
#align abelianization_congr_symm abelianizationCongr_symm
@[simp]
theorem abelianizationCongr_trans {I : Type v} [Group I] (e₂ : H ≃* I) :
e.abelianizationCongr.trans e₂.abelianizationCongr = (e.trans e₂).abelianizationCongr :=
MulEquiv.toMonoidHom_injective (Abelianization.hom_ext _ _ rfl)
#align abelianization_congr_trans abelianizationCongr_trans
end AbelianizationCongr
/-- An Abelian group is equivalent to its own abelianization. -/
@[simps]
def Abelianization.equivOfComm {H : Type*} [CommGroup H] : H ≃* Abelianization H :=
{ Abelianization.of with
toFun := Abelianization.of
invFun := Abelianization.lift (MonoidHom.id H)
left_inv := fun a => rfl
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a⟩
rfl }
#align abelianization.equiv_of_comm Abelianization.equivOfComm
section commutatorRepresentatives
open Subgroup
/-- Representatives `(g₁, g₂) : G × G` of commutators `⁅g₁, g₂⁆ ∈ G`. -/
def commutatorRepresentatives : Set (G × G) :=
Set.range fun g : commutatorSet G => (g.2.choose, g.2.choose_spec.choose)
#align commutator_representatives commutatorRepresentatives
instance [Finite (commutatorSet G)] : Finite (commutatorRepresentatives G) :=
Set.finite_coe_iff.mpr (Set.finite_range _)
/-- Subgroup generated by representatives `g₁ g₂ : G` of commutators `⁅g₁, g₂⁆ ∈ G`. -/
def closureCommutatorRepresentatives : Subgroup G :=
closure (Prod.fst '' commutatorRepresentatives G ∪ Prod.snd '' commutatorRepresentatives G)
#align closure_commutator_representatives closureCommutatorRepresentatives
instance closureCommutatorRepresentatives_fg [Finite (commutatorSet G)] :
Group.FG (closureCommutatorRepresentatives G) :=
Group.closure_finite_fg _
#align closure_commutator_representatives_fg closureCommutatorRepresentatives_fg
theorem rank_closureCommutatorRepresentatives_le [Finite (commutatorSet G)] :
Group.rank (closureCommutatorRepresentatives G) ≤ 2 * Nat.card (commutatorSet G) := by
rw [two_mul]
exact
(Subgroup.rank_closure_finite_le_nat_card _).trans
((Set.card_union_le _ _).trans
(add_le_add ((Finite.card_image_le _).trans (Finite.card_range_le _))
((Finite.card_image_le _).trans (Finite.card_range_le _))))
#align rank_closure_commutator_representations_le rank_closureCommutatorRepresentatives_le
theorem image_commutatorSet_closureCommutatorRepresentatives :
(closureCommutatorRepresentatives G).subtype ''
commutatorSet (closureCommutatorRepresentatives G) =
commutatorSet G := by
apply Set.Subset.antisymm
· rintro - ⟨-, ⟨g₁, g₂, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g₁, g₂, rfl⟩
· exact fun g hg =>
⟨_,
⟨⟨_, subset_closure (Or.inl ⟨_, ⟨⟨g, hg⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩)⟩,
⟨_, subset_closure (Or.inr ⟨_, ⟨⟨g, hg⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩)⟩, rfl⟩,
hg.choose_spec.choose_spec⟩
#align image_commutator_set_closure_commutator_representatives image_commutatorSet_closureCommutatorRepresentatives
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Abelianization.lean | 313 | 316 | theorem card_commutatorSet_closureCommutatorRepresentatives :
Nat.card (commutatorSet (closureCommutatorRepresentatives G)) = Nat.card (commutatorSet G) := by |
rw [← image_commutatorSet_closureCommutatorRepresentatives G]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.image _ _ (subtype_injective _))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.SeparatedMap
#align_import topology.is_locally_homeomorph from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e97cf15cd1aec9bd5c193b2ffac5a6dc9118912b"
/-!
# Local homeomorphisms
This file defines local homeomorphisms.
## Main definitions
For a function `f : X → Y ` between topological spaces, we say
* `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s` if `f` is a local homeomorphism around each point of `s`: for each
`x : X`, the restriction of `f` to some open neighborhood `U` of `x` gives a homeomorphism
between `U` and an open subset of `Y`.
* `IsLocalHomeomorph f`: `f` is a local homeomorphism, i.e. it's a local homeomorphism on `univ`.
Note that `IsLocalHomeomorph` is a global condition. This is in contrast to
`PartialHomeomorph`, which is a homeomorphism between specific open subsets.
## Main results
* local homeomorphisms are locally injective open maps
* more!
-/
open Topology
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] (g : Y → Z)
(f : X → Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y)
/-- A function `f : X → Y` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s` if each `x ∈ s` is contained in
the source of some `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` with `f = e`. -/
def IsLocalHomeomorphOn :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ f = e
#align is_locally_homeomorph_on IsLocalHomeomorphOn
theorem isLocalHomeomorphOn_iff_openEmbedding_restrict {f : X → Y} :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, OpenEmbedding (U.restrict f) := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨e, hxe, rfl⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨e.source, e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe, e.openEmbedding_restrict⟩
· obtain ⟨U, hU, emb⟩ := h x hx
have : OpenEmbedding ((interior U).restrict f) := by
refine emb.comp ⟨embedding_inclusion interior_subset, ?_⟩
rw [Set.range_inclusion]; exact isOpen_induced isOpen_interior
obtain ⟨cont, inj, openMap⟩ := openEmbedding_iff_continuous_injective_open.mp this
haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
exact ⟨PartialHomeomorph.ofContinuousOpenRestrict
(Set.injOn_iff_injective.mpr inj).toPartialEquiv
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mpr cont) openMap isOpen_interior,
mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mpr hU, rfl⟩
namespace IsLocalHomeomorphOn
/-- Proves that `f` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s`. The condition `h` is weaker than the
definition of `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s`, since it only requires `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` to
agree with `f` on its source `e.source`, as opposed to on the whole space `X`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/IsLocalHomeomorph.lean | 66 | 77 | theorem mk (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ Set.EqOn f e e.source) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s := by |
intro x hx
obtain ⟨e, hx, he⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨{ e with
toFun := f
map_source' := fun _x hx ↦ by rw [he hx]; exact e.map_source' hx
left_inv' := fun _x hx ↦ by rw [he hx]; exact e.left_inv' hx
right_inv' := fun _y hy ↦ by rw [he (e.map_target' hy)]; exact e.right_inv' hy
continuousOn_toFun := (continuousOn_congr he).mpr e.continuousOn_toFun },
hx, rfl⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Rayleigh
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Minpoly
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.spectrum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
/-! # Spectral theory of self-adjoint operators
This file covers the spectral theory of self-adjoint operators on an inner product space.
The first part of the file covers general properties, true without any condition on boundedness or
compactness of the operator or finite-dimensionality of the underlying space, notably:
* `LinearMap.IsSymmetric.conj_eigenvalue_eq_self`: the eigenvalues are real
* `LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces`: the eigenspaces are orthogonal
* `LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces`: the restriction of the operator to
the mutual orthogonal complement of the eigenspaces has, itself, no eigenvectors
The second part of the file covers properties of self-adjoint operators in finite dimension.
Letting `T` be a self-adjoint operator on a finite-dimensional inner product space `T`,
* The definition `LinearMap.IsSymmetric.diagonalization` provides a linear isometry equivalence `E`
to the direct sum of the eigenspaces of `T`. The theorem
`LinearMap.IsSymmetric.diagonalization_apply_self_apply` states that, when `T` is transferred via
this equivalence to an operator on the direct sum, it acts diagonally.
* The definition `LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvectorBasis` provides an orthonormal basis for `E`
consisting of eigenvectors of `T`, with `LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvalues` giving the
corresponding list of eigenvalues, as real numbers. The definition
`LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvectorBasis` gives the associated linear isometry equivalence
from `E` to Euclidean space, and the theorem
`LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvectorBasis_apply_self_apply` states that, when `T` is
transferred via this equivalence to an operator on Euclidean space, it acts diagonally.
These are forms of the *diagonalization theorem* for self-adjoint operators on finite-dimensional
inner product spaces.
## TODO
Spectral theory for compact self-adjoint operators, bounded self-adjoint operators.
## Tags
self-adjoint operator, spectral theorem, diagonalization theorem
-/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
open scoped ComplexConjugate
open Module.End
namespace LinearMap
namespace IsSymmetric
variable {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric)
/-- A self-adjoint operator preserves orthogonal complements of its eigenspaces. -/
theorem invariant_orthogonalComplement_eigenspace (μ : 𝕜) (v : E) (hv : v ∈ (eigenspace T μ)ᗮ) :
T v ∈ (eigenspace T μ)ᗮ := by
intro w hw
have : T w = (μ : 𝕜) • w := by rwa [mem_eigenspace_iff] at hw
simp [← hT w, this, inner_smul_left, hv w hw]
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.invariant_orthogonal_eigenspace LinearMap.IsSymmetric.invariant_orthogonalComplement_eigenspace
/-- The eigenvalues of a self-adjoint operator are real. -/
theorem conj_eigenvalue_eq_self {μ : 𝕜} (hμ : HasEigenvalue T μ) : conj μ = μ := by
obtain ⟨v, hv₁, hv₂⟩ := hμ.exists_hasEigenvector
rw [mem_eigenspace_iff] at hv₁
simpa [hv₂, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, hv₁] using hT v v
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.conj_eigenvalue_eq_self LinearMap.IsSymmetric.conj_eigenvalue_eq_self
/-- The eigenspaces of a self-adjoint operator are mutually orthogonal. -/
theorem orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces :
OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun μ => eigenspace T μ) fun μ => (eigenspace T μ).subtypeₗᵢ := by
rintro μ ν hμν ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
by_cases hv' : v = 0
· simp [hv']
have H := hT.conj_eigenvalue_eq_self (hasEigenvalue_of_hasEigenvector ⟨hv, hv'⟩)
rw [mem_eigenspace_iff] at hv hw
refine Or.resolve_left ?_ hμν.symm
simpa [inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, hv, hw, H] using (hT v w).symm
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_family_eigenspaces LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces
theorem orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces' :
OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ) fun μ =>
(eigenspace T μ).subtypeₗᵢ :=
hT.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces.comp Subtype.coe_injective
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_family_eigenspaces' LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces'
/-- The mutual orthogonal complement of the eigenspaces of a self-adjoint operator on an inner
product space is an invariant subspace of the operator. -/
theorem orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant ⦃v : E⦄ (hv : v ∈ (⨆ μ, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ) :
T v ∈ (⨆ μ, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ := by
rw [← Submodule.iInf_orthogonal] at hv ⊢
exact T.iInf_invariant hT.invariant_orthogonalComplement_eigenspace v hv
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_supr_eigenspaces_invariant LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant
/-- The mutual orthogonal complement of the eigenspaces of a self-adjoint operator on an inner
product space has no eigenvalues. -/
theorem orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces (μ : 𝕜) :
eigenspace (T.restrict hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant) μ = ⊥ := by
set p : Submodule 𝕜 E := (⨆ μ, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ
refine eigenspace_restrict_eq_bot hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant ?_
have H₂ : eigenspace T μ ⟂ p := (Submodule.isOrtho_orthogonal_right _).mono_left (le_iSup _ _)
exact H₂.disjoint
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_supr_eigenspaces LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces
/-! ### Finite-dimensional theory -/
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E]
/-- The mutual orthogonal complement of the eigenspaces of a self-adjoint operator on a
finite-dimensional inner product space is trivial. -/
theorem orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_eq_bot : (⨆ μ, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ = ⊥ := by
have hT' : IsSymmetric _ :=
hT.restrict_invariant hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_invariant
-- a self-adjoint operator on a nontrivial inner product space has an eigenvalue
haveI :=
hT'.subsingleton_of_no_eigenvalue_finiteDimensional hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces
exact Submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_supr_eigenspaces_eq_bot LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_eq_bot
theorem orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_eq_bot' :
(⨆ μ : Eigenvalues T, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ = ⊥ :=
show (⨆ μ : { μ // eigenspace T μ ≠ ⊥ }, eigenspace T μ)ᗮ = ⊥ by
rw [iSup_ne_bot_subtype, hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_eq_bot]
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.orthogonal_supr_eigenspaces_eq_bot' LinearMap.IsSymmetric.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_eq_bot'
/-- The eigenspaces of a self-adjoint operator on a finite-dimensional inner product space `E` gives
an internal direct sum decomposition of `E`.
Note this takes `hT` as a `Fact` to allow it to be an instance. -/
noncomputable instance directSumDecomposition [hT : Fact T.IsSymmetric] :
DirectSum.Decomposition fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ :=
haveI h : ∀ μ : Eigenvalues T, CompleteSpace (eigenspace T μ) := fun μ => by infer_instance
hT.out.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces'.decomposition
(Submodule.orthogonal_eq_bot_iff.mp hT.out.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_eq_bot')
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.direct_sum_decomposition LinearMap.IsSymmetric.directSumDecomposition
theorem directSum_decompose_apply [_hT : Fact T.IsSymmetric] (x : E) (μ : Eigenvalues T) :
DirectSum.decompose (fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ) x μ =
orthogonalProjection (eigenspace T μ) x :=
rfl
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.direct_sum_decompose_apply LinearMap.IsSymmetric.directSum_decompose_apply
/-- The eigenspaces of a self-adjoint operator on a finite-dimensional inner product space `E` gives
an internal direct sum decomposition of `E`. -/
theorem direct_sum_isInternal : DirectSum.IsInternal fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ :=
hT.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces'.isInternal_iff.mpr
hT.orthogonalComplement_iSup_eigenspaces_eq_bot'
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.direct_sum_is_internal LinearMap.IsSymmetric.direct_sum_isInternal
section Version1
/-- Isometry from an inner product space `E` to the direct sum of the eigenspaces of some
self-adjoint operator `T` on `E`. -/
noncomputable def diagonalization : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] PiLp 2 fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ :=
hT.direct_sum_isInternal.isometryL2OfOrthogonalFamily hT.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces'
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.diagonalization LinearMap.IsSymmetric.diagonalization
@[simp]
theorem diagonalization_symm_apply (w : PiLp 2 fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ) :
hT.diagonalization.symm w = ∑ μ, w μ :=
hT.direct_sum_isInternal.isometryL2OfOrthogonalFamily_symm_apply
hT.orthogonalFamily_eigenspaces' w
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.diagonalization_symm_apply LinearMap.IsSymmetric.diagonalization_symm_apply
/-- *Diagonalization theorem*, *spectral theorem*; version 1: A self-adjoint operator `T` on a
finite-dimensional inner product space `E` acts diagonally on the decomposition of `E` into the
direct sum of the eigenspaces of `T`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Spectrum.lean | 182 | 191 | theorem diagonalization_apply_self_apply (v : E) (μ : Eigenvalues T) :
hT.diagonalization (T v) μ = (μ : 𝕜) • hT.diagonalization v μ := by |
suffices
∀ w : PiLp 2 fun μ : Eigenvalues T => eigenspace T μ,
T (hT.diagonalization.symm w) = hT.diagonalization.symm fun μ => (μ : 𝕜) • w μ by
simpa only [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using
congr_arg (fun w => hT.diagonalization w μ) (this (hT.diagonalization v))
intro w
have hwT : ∀ μ, T (w μ) = (μ : 𝕜) • w μ := fun μ => mem_eigenspace_iff.1 (w μ).2
simp only [hwT, diagonalization_symm_apply, map_sum, Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.PiAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2d5739b61641ee4e7e53eca5688a08f66f2e6a60"
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
#align mv_power_series MvPowerSeries
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n
#align mv_power_series.monomial MvPowerSeries.monomial
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
#align mv_power_series.coeff MvPowerSeries.coeff
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
#align mv_power_series.ext MvPowerSeries.ext
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
theorem ext_iff {φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R} : φ = ψ ↔ ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ :=
Function.funext_iff
#align mv_power_series.ext_iff MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
#align mv_power_series.monomial_def MvPowerSeries.monomial_def
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [coeff, monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m)]
dsimp only
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [LinearMap.stdBasis_apply, Function.update_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact LinearMap.stdBasis_same R (fun _ ↦ R) n a
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_same MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact LinearMap.stdBasis_ne R (fun _ ↦ R) _ _ h a
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_ne MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_ne
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
#align mv_power_series.eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero MvPowerSeries.eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
#align mv_power_series.coeff_comp_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_comp_monomial
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this.
-- @[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
#align mv_power_series.coeff_one MvPowerSeries.coeff_one
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_one MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_one
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.monomial_zero_one MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_one
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
#align mv_power_series.zero_mul MvPowerSeries.zero_mul
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
#align mv_power_series.mul_zero MvPowerSeries.mul_zero
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_mul
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_snd_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_mul_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul_monomial
theorem coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_left]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_add_monomial_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_add_monomial_mul
theorem coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a := by
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact le_add_left le_rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_add_mul_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_add_mul_monomial
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 251 | 257 | theorem commute_monomial {a : R} {n} :
Commute φ (monomial R n a) ↔ ∀ m, Commute (coeff R m φ) a := by |
refine ext_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => ?_, fun h m => ?_⟩
· have := h (m + n)
rwa [coeff_add_mul_monomial, add_comm, coeff_add_monomial_mul] at this
· rw [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial_mul]
split_ifs <;> [apply h; rfl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Subobjects
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Submonoid.Centralizer
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.subsemiring.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b915e9392ecb2a861e1e766f0e1df6ac481188ca"
/-!
# Bundled subsemirings
We define bundled subsemirings and some standard constructions: `CompleteLattice` structure,
`Subtype` and `inclusion` ring homomorphisms, subsemiring `map`, `comap` and range (`rangeS`) of
a `RingHom` etc.
-/
universe u v w
section AddSubmonoidWithOneClass
/-- `AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R` says `S` is a type of subsets `s ≤ R` that contain `0`, `1`,
and are closed under `(+)` -/
class AddSubmonoidWithOneClass (S R : Type*) [AddMonoidWithOne R]
[SetLike S R] extends AddSubmonoidClass S R, OneMemClass S R : Prop
#align add_submonoid_with_one_class AddSubmonoidWithOneClass
variable {S R : Type*} [AddMonoidWithOne R] [SetLike S R] (s : S)
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem natCast_mem [AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R] (n : ℕ) : (n : R) ∈ s := by
induction n <;> simp [zero_mem, add_mem, one_mem, *]
#align nat_cast_mem natCast_mem
#align coe_nat_mem natCast_mem
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated] alias coe_nat_mem := natCast_mem
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
lemma ofNat_mem [AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R] (s : S) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ∈ s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_eq_ofNat]; exact natCast_mem s n
instance (priority := 74) AddSubmonoidWithOneClass.toAddMonoidWithOne
[AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R] : AddMonoidWithOne s :=
{ AddSubmonoidClass.toAddMonoid s with
one := ⟨_, one_mem s⟩
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, natCast_mem s n⟩
natCast_zero := Subtype.ext Nat.cast_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => Subtype.ext (Nat.cast_succ _) }
#align add_submonoid_with_one_class.to_add_monoid_with_one AddSubmonoidWithOneClass.toAddMonoidWithOne
end AddSubmonoidWithOneClass
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} [NonAssocSemiring R] (M : Submonoid R)
section SubsemiringClass
/-- `SubsemiringClass S R` states that `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ R` that
are both a multiplicative and an additive submonoid. -/
class SubsemiringClass (S : Type*) (R : Type u) [NonAssocSemiring R]
[SetLike S R] extends SubmonoidClass S R, AddSubmonoidClass S R : Prop
#align subsemiring_class SubsemiringClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SubsemiringClass.addSubmonoidWithOneClass (S : Type*)
(R : Type u) [NonAssocSemiring R] [SetLike S R] [h : SubsemiringClass S R] :
AddSubmonoidWithOneClass S R :=
{ h with }
#align subsemiring_class.add_submonoid_with_one_class SubsemiringClass.addSubmonoidWithOneClass
variable [SetLike S R] [hSR : SubsemiringClass S R] (s : S)
namespace SubsemiringClass
-- Prefer subclasses of `NonAssocSemiring` over subclasses of `SubsemiringClass`.
/-- A subsemiring of a `NonAssocSemiring` inherits a `NonAssocSemiring` structure -/
instance (priority := 75) toNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.nonAssocSemiring (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.to_non_assoc_semiring SubsemiringClass.toNonAssocSemiring
instance nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial s :=
nontrivial_of_ne 0 1 fun H => zero_ne_one (congr_arg Subtype.val H)
#align subsemiring_class.nontrivial SubsemiringClass.nontrivial
instance noZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.noZeroDivisors _ rfl fun _ _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.no_zero_divisors SubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors
/-- The natural ring hom from a subsemiring of semiring `R` to `R`. -/
def subtype : s →+* R :=
{ SubmonoidClass.subtype s, AddSubmonoidClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
#align subsemiring_class.subtype SubsemiringClass.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → R) = ((↑) : s → R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring_class.coe_subtype SubsemiringClass.coe_subtype
-- Prefer subclasses of `Semiring` over subclasses of `SubsemiringClass`.
/-- A subsemiring of a `Semiring` is a `Semiring`. -/
instance (priority := 75) toSemiring {R} [Semiring R] [SetLike S R] [SubsemiringClass S R] :
Semiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.semiring (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.to_semiring SubsemiringClass.toSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow {R} [Semiring R] [SetLike S R] [SubsemiringClass S R] (x : s) (n : ℕ) :
((x ^ n : s) : R) = (x : R) ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, ih]
#align subsemiring_class.coe_pow SubsemiringClass.coe_pow
/-- A subsemiring of a `CommSemiring` is a `CommSemiring`. -/
instance toCommSemiring {R} [CommSemiring R] [SetLike S R] [SubsemiringClass S R] :
CommSemiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commSemiring (↑) rfl rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align subsemiring_class.to_comm_semiring SubsemiringClass.toCommSemiring
instance instCharZero [CharZero R] : CharZero s :=
⟨Function.Injective.of_comp (f := Subtype.val) (g := Nat.cast (R := s)) Nat.cast_injective⟩
end SubsemiringClass
end SubsemiringClass
variable [NonAssocSemiring S] [NonAssocSemiring T]
/-- A subsemiring of a semiring `R` is a subset `s` that is both a multiplicative and an additive
submonoid. -/
structure Subsemiring (R : Type u) [NonAssocSemiring R] extends Submonoid R, AddSubmonoid R
#align subsemiring Subsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `Subsemiring` as a `Submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subsemiring.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `Subsemiring` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid
namespace Subsemiring
instance : SetLike (Subsemiring R) R where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : SubsemiringClass (Subsemiring R) R where
zero_mem := zero_mem'
add_mem {s} := AddSubsemigroup.add_mem' s.toAddSubmonoid.toAddSubsemigroup
one_mem {s} := Submonoid.one_mem' s.toSubmonoid
mul_mem {s} := Subsemigroup.mul_mem' s.toSubmonoid.toSubsemigroup
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmonoid {s : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_to_submonoid Subsemiring.mem_toSubmonoid
-- `@[simp]` -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove thisrove this
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_carrier Subsemiring.mem_carrier
/-- Two subsemirings are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : Subsemiring R} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subsemiring.ext Subsemiring.ext
/-- Copy of a subsemiring with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : Subsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : Subsemiring R :=
{ S.toAddSubmonoid.copy s hs, S.toSubmonoid.copy s hs with carrier := s }
#align subsemiring.copy Subsemiring.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : Subsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_copy Subsemiring.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : Subsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subsemiring.copy_eq Subsemiring.copy_eq
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (toSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → Submonoid R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align subsemiring.to_submonoid_injective Subsemiring.toSubmonoid_injective
@[mono]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → Submonoid R) :=
fun _ _ => id
#align subsemiring.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subsemiring.toSubmonoid_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → Submonoid R) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subsemiring.to_submonoid_mono Subsemiring.toSubmonoid_mono
theorem toAddSubmonoid_injective :
Function.Injective (toAddSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_injective Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toAddSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) :=
fun _ _ => id
#align subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toAddSubmonoid : Subsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) :=
toAddSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_mono Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_mono
/-- Construct a `Subsemiring R` from a set `s`, a submonoid `sm`, and an additive
submonoid `sa` such that `x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ sm ↔ x ∈ sa`. -/
protected def mk' (s : Set R) (sm : Submonoid R) (hm : ↑sm = s) (sa : AddSubmonoid R)
(ha : ↑sa = s) : Subsemiring R where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by exact ha ▸ sa.zero_mem
one_mem' := by exact hm ▸ sm.one_mem
add_mem' {x y} := by simpa only [← ha] using sa.add_mem
mul_mem' {x y} := by simpa only [← hm] using sm.mul_mem
#align subsemiring.mk' Subsemiring.mk'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R} (ha : ↑sa = s) :
(Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_mk' Subsemiring.coe_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk' {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R} (ha : ↑sa = s)
{x : R} : x ∈ Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_mk' Subsemiring.mem_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toSubmonoid {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha).toSubmonoid = sm :=
SetLike.coe_injective hm.symm
#align subsemiring.mk'_to_submonoid Subsemiring.mk'_toSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toAddSubmonoid {s : Set R} {sm : Submonoid R} (hm : ↑sm = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (Subsemiring.mk' s sm hm sa ha).toAddSubmonoid = sa :=
SetLike.coe_injective ha.symm
#align subsemiring.mk'_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.mk'_toAddSubmonoid
end Subsemiring
namespace Subsemiring
variable (s : Subsemiring R)
/-- A subsemiring contains the semiring's 1. -/
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : R) ∈ s :=
one_mem s
#align subsemiring.one_mem Subsemiring.one_mem
/-- A subsemiring contains the semiring's 0. -/
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : R) ∈ s :=
zero_mem s
#align subsemiring.zero_mem Subsemiring.zero_mem
/-- A subsemiring is closed under multiplication. -/
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : R} : x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s :=
mul_mem
#align subsemiring.mul_mem Subsemiring.mul_mem
/-- A subsemiring is closed under addition. -/
protected theorem add_mem {x y : R} : x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s :=
add_mem
#align subsemiring.add_mem Subsemiring.add_mem
/-- Product of a list of elements in a `Subsemiring` is in the `Subsemiring`. -/
nonrec theorem list_prod_mem {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) {l : List R} :
(∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s) → l.prod ∈ s :=
list_prod_mem
#align subsemiring.list_prod_mem Subsemiring.list_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a list of elements in a `Subsemiring` is in the `Subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem list_sum_mem {l : List R} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s) → l.sum ∈ s :=
list_sum_mem
#align subsemiring.list_sum_mem Subsemiring.list_sum_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in a `Subsemiring` of a `CommSemiring`
is in the `Subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem multiset_prod_mem {R} [CommSemiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) (m : Multiset R) :
(∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s) → m.prod ∈ s :=
multiset_prod_mem m
#align subsemiring.multiset_prod_mem Subsemiring.multiset_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a multiset of elements in a `Subsemiring` of a `Semiring` is
in the `add_subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem (m : Multiset R) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s) → m.sum ∈ s :=
multiset_sum_mem m
#align subsemiring.multiset_sum_mem Subsemiring.multiset_sum_mem
/-- Product of elements of a subsemiring of a `CommSemiring` indexed by a `Finset` is in the
subsemiring. -/
protected theorem prod_mem {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) {ι : Type*}
{t : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ s) : (∏ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ s :=
prod_mem h
#align subsemiring.prod_mem Subsemiring.prod_mem
/-- Sum of elements in a `Subsemiring` of a `Semiring` indexed by a `Finset`
is in the `add_subsemiring`. -/
protected theorem sum_mem (s : Subsemiring R) {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → R}
(h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ s) : (∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ s :=
sum_mem h
#align subsemiring.sum_mem Subsemiring.sum_mem
/-- A subsemiring of a `NonAssocSemiring` inherits a `NonAssocSemiring` structure -/
instance toNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring s :=
-- Porting note: this used to be a specialized instance which needed to be expensively unified.
SubsemiringClass.toNonAssocSemiring _
#align subsemiring.to_non_assoc_semiring Subsemiring.toNonAssocSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : s) : R) = (1 : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_one Subsemiring.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : s) : R) = (0 : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_zero Subsemiring.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : s) : ((x + y : s) : R) = (x + y : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_add Subsemiring.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : s) : ((x * y : s) : R) = (x * y : R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_mul Subsemiring.coe_mul
instance nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial s :=
nontrivial_of_ne 0 1 fun H => zero_ne_one (congr_arg Subtype.val H)
#align subsemiring.nontrivial Subsemiring.nontrivial
protected theorem pow_mem {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) {x : R} (hx : x ∈ s)
(n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ s :=
pow_mem hx n
#align subsemiring.pow_mem Subsemiring.pow_mem
instance noZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors s where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {_ _} h :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| Subtype.ext_iff.mp h).imp Subtype.eq Subtype.eq
#align subsemiring.no_zero_divisors Subsemiring.noZeroDivisors
/-- A subsemiring of a `Semiring` is a `Semiring`. -/
instance toSemiring {R} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) : Semiring s :=
{ s.toNonAssocSemiring, s.toSubmonoid.toMonoid with }
#align subsemiring.to_semiring Subsemiring.toSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow {R} [Semiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) (x : s) (n : ℕ) :
((x ^ n : s) : R) = (x : R) ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, ih]
#align subsemiring.coe_pow Subsemiring.coe_pow
/-- A subsemiring of a `CommSemiring` is a `CommSemiring`. -/
instance toCommSemiring {R} [CommSemiring R] (s : Subsemiring R) : CommSemiring s :=
{ s.toSemiring with mul_comm := fun _ _ => Subtype.eq <| mul_comm _ _ }
#align subsemiring.to_comm_semiring Subsemiring.toCommSemiring
/-- The natural ring hom from a subsemiring of semiring `R` to `R`. -/
def subtype : s →+* R :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.subtype, s.toAddSubmonoid.subtype with toFun := (↑) }
#align subsemiring.subtype Subsemiring.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : ⇑s.subtype = ((↑) : s → R) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_subtype Subsemiring.coe_subtype
protected theorem nsmul_mem {x : R} (hx : x ∈ s) (n : ℕ) : n • x ∈ s :=
nsmul_mem hx n
#align subsemiring.nsmul_mem Subsemiring.nsmul_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.toSubmonoid : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_to_submonoid Subsemiring.coe_toSubmonoid
-- Porting note: adding this as `simp`-normal form for `coe_toAddSubmonoid`
@[simp]
theorem coe_carrier_toSubmonoid (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.toSubmonoid.carrier : Set R) = s :=
rfl
-- Porting note: can be proven using `SetLike` so removing `@[simp]`
theorem mem_toAddSubmonoid {s : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toAddSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.mem_toAddSubmonoid
-- Porting note: new normal form is `coe_carrier_toSubmonoid` so removing `@[simp]`
theorem coe_toAddSubmonoid (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.toAddSubmonoid : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.coe_toAddSubmonoid
/-- The subsemiring `R` of the semiring `R`. -/
instance : Top (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submonoid R), (⊤ : AddSubmonoid R) with }⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : R) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subsemiring R) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subsemiring.mem_top Subsemiring.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_top Subsemiring.coe_top
/-- The ring equiv between the top element of `Subsemiring R` and `R`. -/
@[simps]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subsemiring R) ≃+* R where
toFun r := r
invFun r := ⟨r, Subsemiring.mem_top r⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_mul' := (⊤ : Subsemiring R).coe_mul
map_add' := (⊤ : Subsemiring R).coe_add
#align subsemiring.top_equiv Subsemiring.topEquiv
/-- The preimage of a subsemiring along a ring homomorphism is a subsemiring. -/
def comap (f : R →+* S) (s : Subsemiring S) : Subsemiring R :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.comap (f : R →* S), s.toAddSubmonoid.comap (f : R →+ S) with carrier := f ⁻¹' s }
#align subsemiring.comap Subsemiring.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (s : Subsemiring S) (f : R →+* S) : (s.comap f : Set R) = f ⁻¹' s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_comap Subsemiring.coe_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {s : Subsemiring S} {f : R →+* S} {x : R} : x ∈ s.comap f ↔ f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_comap Subsemiring.mem_comap
theorem comap_comap (s : Subsemiring T) (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S) :
(s.comap g).comap f = s.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.comap_comap Subsemiring.comap_comap
/-- The image of a subsemiring along a ring homomorphism is a subsemiring. -/
def map (f : R →+* S) (s : Subsemiring R) : Subsemiring S :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.map (f : R →* S), s.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : R →+ S) with carrier := f '' s }
#align subsemiring.map Subsemiring.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : R →+* S) (s : Subsemiring R) : (s.map f : Set S) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_map Subsemiring.coe_map
@[simp]
lemma mem_map {f : R →+* S} {s : Subsemiring R} {y : S} : y ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, f x = y := Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_map Subsemiring.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : s.map (RingHom.id R) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
#align subsemiring.map_id Subsemiring.map_id
theorem map_map (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
#align subsemiring.map_map Subsemiring.map_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : R →+* S} {s : Subsemiring R} {t : Subsemiring S} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
#align subsemiring.map_le_iff_le_comap Subsemiring.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : R →+* S) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align subsemiring.gc_map_comap Subsemiring.gc_map_comap
/-- A subsemiring is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) : s ≃+* s.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f s hf with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (f.map_mul _ _)
map_add' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (f.map_add _ _) }
#align subsemiring.equiv_map_of_injective Subsemiring.equivMapOfInjective
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : s) :
(equivMapOfInjective s f hf x : S) = f x :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply Subsemiring.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
end Subsemiring
namespace RingHom
variable (g : S →+* T) (f : R →+* S)
/-- The range of a ring homomorphism is a subsemiring. See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def rangeS : Subsemiring S :=
((⊤ : Subsemiring R).map f).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align ring_hom.srange RingHom.rangeS
@[simp]
theorem coe_rangeS : (f.rangeS : Set S) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.coe_srange RingHom.coe_rangeS
@[simp]
theorem mem_rangeS {f : R →+* S} {y : S} : y ∈ f.rangeS ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align ring_hom.mem_srange RingHom.mem_rangeS
theorem rangeS_eq_map (f : R →+* S) : f.rangeS = (⊤ : Subsemiring R).map f := by
ext
simp
#align ring_hom.srange_eq_map RingHom.rangeS_eq_map
theorem mem_rangeS_self (f : R →+* S) (x : R) : f x ∈ f.rangeS :=
mem_rangeS.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align ring_hom.mem_srange_self RingHom.mem_rangeS_self
theorem map_rangeS : f.rangeS.map g = (g.comp f).rangeS := by
simpa only [rangeS_eq_map] using (⊤ : Subsemiring R).map_map g f
#align ring_hom.map_srange RingHom.map_rangeS
/-- The range of a morphism of semirings is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `Fintype S`. -/
instance fintypeRangeS [Fintype R] [DecidableEq S] (f : R →+* S) : Fintype (rangeS f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
#align ring_hom.fintype_srange RingHom.fintypeRangeS
end RingHom
namespace Subsemiring
instance : Bot (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨(Nat.castRingHom R).rangeS⟩
instance : Inhabited (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨⊥⟩
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = Set.range ((↑) : ℕ → R) :=
(Nat.castRingHom R).coe_rangeS
#align subsemiring.coe_bot Subsemiring.coe_bot
theorem mem_bot {x : R} : x ∈ (⊥ : Subsemiring R) ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ↑n = x :=
RingHom.mem_rangeS
#align subsemiring.mem_bot Subsemiring.mem_bot
/-- The inf of two subsemirings is their intersection. -/
instance : Inf (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨fun s t =>
{ s.toSubmonoid ⊓ t.toSubmonoid, s.toAddSubmonoid ⊓ t.toAddSubmonoid with carrier := s ∩ t }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subsemiring R) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = (p : Set R) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_inf Subsemiring.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_inf Subsemiring.mem_inf
instance : InfSet (Subsemiring R) :=
⟨fun s =>
Subsemiring.mk' (⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t) (⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toSubmonoid t) (by simp)
(⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t)
(by simp)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (Subsemiring R)) : ((sInf S : Subsemiring R) : Set R) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_Inf Subsemiring.coe_sInf
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subsemiring R)} {x : R} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subsemiring.mem_Inf Subsemiring.mem_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmonoid (s : Set (Subsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toSubmonoid = ⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toSubmonoid t :=
mk'_toSubmonoid _ _
#align subsemiring.Inf_to_submonoid Subsemiring.sInf_toSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toAddSubmonoid (s : Set (Subsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toAddSubmonoid = ⨅ t ∈ s, Subsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t :=
mk'_toAddSubmonoid _ _
#align subsemiring.Inf_to_add_submonoid Subsemiring.sInf_toAddSubmonoid
/-- Subsemirings of a semiring form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (Subsemiring R) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subsemiring R) fun _ =>
IsGLB.of_image
(fun {s t : Subsemiring R} => show (s : Set R) ⊆ t ↔ s ≤ t from SetLike.coe_subset_coe)
isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun s _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := mem_bot.1 hx
hn ▸ natCast_mem s n
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _ _ => trivial
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩ }
theorem eq_top_iff' (A : Subsemiring R) : A = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : R, x ∈ A :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align subsemiring.eq_top_iff' Subsemiring.eq_top_iff'
section NonAssocSemiring
variable (R) [NonAssocSemiring R]
/-- The center of a non-associative semiring `R` is the set of elements that commute and associate
with everything in `R` -/
def center : Subsemiring R :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiring.center R with
one_mem' := Set.one_mem_center R }
#align subsemiring.center Subsemiring.center
theorem coe_center : ↑(center R) = Set.center R :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_center Subsemiring.coe_center
@[simp]
theorem center_toSubmonoid : (center R).toSubmonoid = Submonoid.center R :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.center_to_submonoid Subsemiring.center_toSubmonoid
/-- The center is commutative and associative.
This is not an instance as it forms a non-defeq diamond with
`NonUnitalSubringClass.tNonUnitalring ` in the `npow` field. -/
abbrev center.commSemiring' : CommSemiring (center R) :=
{ Submonoid.center.commMonoid', (center R).toNonAssocSemiring with }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
/-- The center is commutative. -/
instance center.commSemiring {R} [Semiring R] : CommSemiring (center R) :=
{ Submonoid.center.commMonoid, (center R).toSemiring with }
-- no instance diamond, unlike the primed version
example {R} [Semiring R] :
center.commSemiring.toSemiring = Subsemiring.toSemiring (center R) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem mem_center_iff {R} [Semiring R] {z : R} : z ∈ center R ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g :=
Subsemigroup.mem_center_iff
#align subsemiring.mem_center_iff Subsemiring.mem_center_iff
instance decidableMemCenter {R} [Semiring R] [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ center R) := fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
#align subsemiring.decidable_mem_center Subsemiring.decidableMemCenter
@[simp]
theorem center_eq_top (R) [CommSemiring R] : center R = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.center_eq_univ R)
#align subsemiring.center_eq_top Subsemiring.center_eq_top
end Semiring
section Centralizer
/-- The centralizer of a set as subsemiring. -/
def centralizer {R} [Semiring R] (s : Set R) : Subsemiring R :=
{ Submonoid.centralizer s with
carrier := s.centralizer
zero_mem' := Set.zero_mem_centralizer _
add_mem' := Set.add_mem_centralizer }
#align subsemiring.centralizer Subsemiring.centralizer
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] (s : Set R) : (centralizer s : Set R) = s.centralizer :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.coe_centralizer Subsemiring.coe_centralizer
theorem centralizer_toSubmonoid {R} [Semiring R] (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s).toSubmonoid = Submonoid.centralizer s :=
rfl
#align subsemiring.centralizer_to_submonoid Subsemiring.centralizer_toSubmonoid
theorem mem_centralizer_iff {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} {z : R} :
z ∈ centralizer s ↔ ∀ g ∈ s, g * z = z * g :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemiring.mem_centralizer_iff Subsemiring.mem_centralizer_iff
theorem center_le_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] (s) : center R ≤ centralizer s :=
s.center_subset_centralizer
#align subsemiring.center_le_centralizer Subsemiring.center_le_centralizer
theorem centralizer_le {R} [Semiring R] (s t : Set R) (h : s ⊆ t) : centralizer t ≤ centralizer s :=
Set.centralizer_subset h
#align subsemiring.centralizer_le Subsemiring.centralizer_le
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} :
centralizer s = ⊤ ↔ s ⊆ center R :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
#align subsemiring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset Subsemiring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_univ {R} [Semiring R] : centralizer Set.univ = center R :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.centralizer_univ R)
#align subsemiring.centralizer_univ Subsemiring.centralizer_univ
lemma le_centralizer_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] {s : Subsemiring R} :
s ≤ centralizer (centralizer (s : Set R)) :=
Set.subset_centralizer_centralizer
@[simp]
lemma centralizer_centralizer_centralizer {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} :
centralizer s.centralizer.centralizer = centralizer s := by
apply SetLike.coe_injective
simp only [coe_centralizer, Set.centralizer_centralizer_centralizer]
end Centralizer
/-- The `Subsemiring` generated by a set. -/
def closure (s : Set R) : Subsemiring R :=
sInf { S | s ⊆ S }
#align subsemiring.closure Subsemiring.closure
theorem mem_closure {x : R} {s : Set R} : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : Subsemiring R, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
#align subsemiring.mem_closure Subsemiring.mem_closure
/-- The subsemiring generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_closure {s : Set R} : s ⊆ closure s := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hS => hS hx
#align subsemiring.subset_closure Subsemiring.subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : Set R} {P : R} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align subsemiring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure Subsemiring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
/-- A subsemiring `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_le {s : Set R} {t : Subsemiring R} : closure s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Set.Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align subsemiring.closure_le Subsemiring.closure_le
/-- Subsemiring closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set R⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Set.Subset.trans h subset_closure
#align subsemiring.closure_mono Subsemiring.closure_mono
theorem closure_eq_of_le {s : Set R} {t : Subsemiring R} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ≤ closure s) :
closure s = t :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
#align subsemiring.closure_eq_of_le Subsemiring.closure_eq_of_le
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : R ≃+* S} {K : Subsemiring R} {x : S} :
x ∈ K.map (f : R →+* S) ↔ f.symm x ∈ K := by
convert @Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (↑K) f.toEquiv x using 1
#align subsemiring.mem_map_equiv Subsemiring.mem_map_equiv
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : Subsemiring R) :
K.map (f : R →+* S) = K.comap f.symm :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
#align subsemiring.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm Subsemiring.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : Subsemiring S) :
K.comap (f : R →+* S) = K.map f.symm :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
#align subsemiring.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm Subsemiring.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm
end Subsemiring
namespace Submonoid
/-- The additive closure of a submonoid is a subsemiring. -/
def subsemiringClosure (M : Submonoid R) : Subsemiring R :=
{ AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) with
one_mem' := AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mpr fun _ hy => hy M.one_mem
mul_mem' := MulMemClass.mul_mem_add_closure }
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure Submonoid.subsemiringClosure
theorem subsemiringClosure_coe :
(M.subsemiringClosure : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure_coe Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_coe
theorem subsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid :
M.subsemiringClosure.toAddSubmonoid = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure_to_add_submonoid Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid
/-- The `Subsemiring` generated by a multiplicative submonoid coincides with the
`Subsemiring.closure` of the submonoid itself . -/
theorem subsemiringClosure_eq_closure : M.subsemiringClosure = Subsemiring.closure (M : Set R) := by
ext
refine
⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx =>
(Subsemiring.mem_closure.mp hx) M.subsemiringClosure fun s sM => ?_⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H1, rfl⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H2, rfl⟩
· exact AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp hx H1.toAddSubmonoid H2
· exact H2 sM
#align submonoid.subsemiring_closure_eq_closure Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_eq_closure
end Submonoid
namespace Subsemiring
@[simp]
theorem closure_submonoid_closure (s : Set R) : closure ↑(Submonoid.closure s) = closure s :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le.mpr fun _ hy =>
(Submonoid.mem_closure.mp hy) (closure s).toSubmonoid subset_closure)
(closure_mono Submonoid.subset_closure)
#align subsemiring.closure_submonoid_closure Subsemiring.closure_submonoid_closure
/-- The elements of the subsemiring closure of `M` are exactly the elements of the additive closure
of a multiplicative submonoid `M`. -/
theorem coe_closure_eq (s : Set R) :
(closure s : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (Submonoid.closure s : Set R) := by
simp [← Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid, Submonoid.subsemiringClosure_eq_closure]
#align subsemiring.coe_closure_eq Subsemiring.coe_closure_eq
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set R} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ x ∈ AddSubmonoid.closure (Submonoid.closure s : Set R) :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (coe_closure_eq s) x
#align subsemiring.mem_closure_iff Subsemiring.mem_closure_iff
@[simp]
theorem closure_addSubmonoid_closure {s : Set R} :
closure ↑(AddSubmonoid.closure s) = closure s := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => closure_mono AddSubmonoid.subset_closure hx⟩
rintro - ⟨H, rfl⟩
rintro - ⟨J, rfl⟩
refine (AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp (mem_closure_iff.mp hx)) H.toAddSubmonoid fun y hy => ?_
refine (Submonoid.mem_closure.mp hy) H.toSubmonoid fun z hz => ?_
exact (AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp hz) H.toAddSubmonoid fun w hw => J hw
#align subsemiring.closure_add_submonoid_closure Subsemiring.closure_addSubmonoid_closure
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `0`, `1`, and all elements
of `s`, and is preserved under addition and multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements
of the closure of `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {s : Set R} {p : R → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(zero : p 0) (one : p 1) (add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨p, @mul⟩, one⟩, @add, zero⟩).2 mem h
#align subsemiring.closure_induction Subsemiring.closure_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction' {s : Set R} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure h))
(zero : p 0 (zero_mem _)) (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy))
(mul : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
{a : R} (ha : a ∈ closure s) : p a ha := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (ha : a ∈ closure s) (hc : p a ha) => hc
refine
closure_induction ha (fun m hm => ⟨subset_closure hm, mem m hm⟩) ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
⟨one_mem _, one⟩ ?_ ?_
· exact (fun x y hx hy => hx.elim fun hx' hx => hy.elim fun hy' hy =>
⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
· exact (fun x y hx hy => hx.elim fun hx' hx => hy.elim fun hy' hy =>
⟨mul_mem hx' hy', mul _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction₂ {s : Set R} {p : R → R → Prop} {x} {y : R} (hx : x ∈ closure s)
(hy : y ∈ closure s) (Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, p x y) (H0_left : ∀ x, p 0 x)
(H0_right : ∀ x, p x 0) (H1_left : ∀ x, p 1 x) (H1_right : ∀ x, p x 1)
(Hadd_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ + x₂) y)
(Hadd_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ + y₂))
(Hmul_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ * x₂) y)
(Hmul_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ * y₂)) : p x y :=
closure_induction hx
(fun x₁ x₁s =>
closure_induction hy (Hs x₁ x₁s) (H0_right x₁) (H1_right x₁) (Hadd_right x₁) (Hmul_right x₁))
(H0_left y) (H1_left y) (fun z z' => Hadd_left z z' y) fun z z' => Hmul_left z z' y
#align subsemiring.closure_induction₂ Subsemiring.closure_induction₂
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Subsemiring/Basic.lean | 900 | 925 | theorem mem_closure_iff_exists_list {R} [Semiring R] {s : Set R} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ L : List (List R), (∀ t ∈ L, ∀ y ∈ t, y ∈ s) ∧ (L.map List.prod).sum = x := by |
constructor
· intro hx
-- Porting note: needed explicit `p`
let p : R → Prop := fun x =>
∃ (L : List (List R)),
(∀ (t : List R), t ∈ L → ∀ (y : R), y ∈ t → y ∈ s) ∧ (List.map List.prod L).sum = x
exact AddSubmonoid.closure_induction (p := p) (mem_closure_iff.1 hx)
(fun x hx =>
suffices ∃ t : List R, (∀ y ∈ t, y ∈ s) ∧ t.prod = x from
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := this
⟨[t], List.forall_mem_singleton.2 ht1, by
rw [List.map_singleton, List.sum_singleton, ht2]⟩
Submonoid.closure_induction hx
(fun x hx => ⟨[x], List.forall_mem_singleton.2 hx, one_mul x⟩)
⟨[], List.forall_mem_nil _, rfl⟩ fun x y ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ ⟨u, hu1, hu2⟩ =>
⟨t ++ u, List.forall_mem_append.2 ⟨ht1, hu1⟩, by rw [List.prod_append, ht2, hu2]⟩)
⟨[], List.forall_mem_nil _, rfl⟩ fun x y ⟨L, HL1, HL2⟩ ⟨M, HM1, HM2⟩ =>
⟨L ++ M, List.forall_mem_append.2 ⟨HL1, HM1⟩, by
rw [List.map_append, List.sum_append, HL2, HM2]⟩
· rintro ⟨L, HL1, HL2⟩
exact HL2 ▸
list_sum_mem fun r hr =>
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := List.mem_map.1 hr
ht2 ▸ list_prod_mem _ fun y hy => subset_closure <| HL1 t ht1 y hy
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
#align uniform_space_of_dist UniformSpace.ofDist
-- Porting note: dropped the `dist_self` argument
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun x hx y => hx.elim⟩ (fun s ⟨c, hc⟩ t h => ⟨c, fun x hx y hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
#align bornology.of_dist Bornology.ofDistₓ
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
dist : α → α → ℝ
#align has_dist Dist
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
#noalign pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist_tac -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore
/-- Pseudo metric and Metric spaces
A pseudo metric space is endowed with a distance for which the requirement `d(x,y)=0 → x = y` might
not hold. A metric space is a pseudo metric space such that `d(x,y)=0 → x = y`.
Each pseudo metric space induces a canonical `UniformSpace` and hence a canonical
`TopologicalSpace` This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `UniformSpace`
structure. When instantiating a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure, the uniformity fields are not
necessary, they will be filled in by default. In the same way, each (pseudo) metric space induces a
(pseudo) emetric space structure. It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
-/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends Dist α : Type u where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y)
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add := by _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space PseudoMetricSpace
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with d _ _ _ ed hed U hU B hB
cases' m' with d' _ _ _ ed' hed' U' hU' B' hB'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
#align pseudo_metric_space.ext PseudoMetricSpace.ext
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_edist PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
#align pseudo_metric_space.of_dist_topology PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
#align dist_self dist_self
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
#align dist_comm dist_comm
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
#align edist_dist edist_dist
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
#align dist_triangle dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_left dist_triangle_left
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_right dist_triangle_right
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
#align dist_triangle4 dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_left dist_triangle4_left
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_right dist_triangle4_right
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, dist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
dist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ dist (f m) (f n) + dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_dist dist_le_Ico_sum_dist
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align dist_le_range_sum_dist dist_le_range_sum_dist
/-- A version of `dist_le_Ico_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le
/-- A version of `dist_le_range_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
#align swap_dist swap_dist
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
#align abs_dist_sub_le abs_dist_sub_le
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
#align dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align abs_dist abs_dist
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
#align has_nndist NNDist
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_nndist PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
#align dist_nndist dist_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
#align coe_nndist coe_nndist
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align edist_nndist edist_nndist
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
#align nndist_edist nndist_edist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
#align coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
#align edist_lt_coe edist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align edist_le_coe edist_le_coe
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align edist_lt_top edist_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
#align edist_ne_top edist_ne_top
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
#align nndist_self nndist_self
-- Porting note: `dist_nndist` and `coe_nndist` moved up
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_lt_coe dist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_le_coe dist_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
#align edist_lt_of_real edist_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
#align edist_le_of_real edist_le_ofReal
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align nndist_dist nndist_dist
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
#align nndist_comm nndist_comm
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle nndist_triangle
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_left nndist_triangle_left
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_right nndist_triangle_right
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
#align dist_edist dist_edist
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
#align metric.ball Metric.ball
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_ball Metric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball' Metric.mem_ball'
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
#align metric.pos_of_mem_ball Metric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_ball_self Metric.mem_ball_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_ball Metric.nonempty_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
#align metric.ball_eq_empty Metric.ball_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
#align metric.ball_zero Metric.ball_zero
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball Metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
#align metric.ball_eq_ball Metric.ball_eq_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
#align metric.ball_eq_ball' Metric.ball_eq_ball'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_ball_nat
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat_succ Metric.iUnion_ball_nat_succ
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
#align metric.closed_ball Metric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_closed_ball Metric.mem_closedBall
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball' Metric.mem_closedBall'
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
#align metric.sphere Metric.sphere
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_sphere Metric.mem_sphere
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
#align metric.mem_sphere' Metric.mem_sphere'
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
#align metric.ne_of_mem_sphere Metric.ne_of_mem_sphere
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
#align metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere Metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
#align metric.sphere_is_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball_self Metric.mem_closedBall_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_closed_ball Metric.nonempty_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_empty Metric.closedBall_eq_empty
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_sphere_of_nonpos Metric.closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
#align metric.ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.ball_subset_closedBall
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
#align metric.sphere_subset_closed_ball Metric.sphere_subset_closedBall
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_ball
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
#align metric.ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_closedBall
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.ball_disjoint_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_ball
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_closedBall
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
#align metric.sphere_disjoint_ball Metric.sphere_disjoint_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
#align metric.ball_union_sphere Metric.ball_union_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
#align metric.sphere_union_ball Metric.sphere_union_ball
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
#align metric.closed_ball_diff_sphere Metric.closedBall_diff_sphere
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
#align metric.closed_ball_diff_ball Metric.closedBall_diff_ball
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball_comm Metric.mem_ball_comm
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball_comm Metric.mem_closedBall_comm
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
#align metric.mem_sphere_comm Metric.mem_sphere_comm
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
#align metric.ball_subset_ball Metric.ball_subset_ball
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_bInter_ball Metric.closedBall_eq_bInter_ball
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
#align metric.ball_subset_ball' Metric.ball_subset_ball'
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.closedBall_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_closed_ball' Metric.closedBall_subset_closedBall'
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_ball Metric.closedBall_subset_ball
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
#align metric.closed_ball_subset_ball' Metric.closedBall_subset_ball'
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
#align metric.dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closed_ball_inter_closed_ball Metric.dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closed_ball_inter_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closed_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
#align metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball Metric.dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_closed_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_closedBall_nat
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
#align metric.Union_inter_closed_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
#align metric.ball_subset Metric.ball_subset
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
#align metric.ball_half_subset Metric.ball_half_subset
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
#align metric.exists_ball_subset_ball Metric.exists_ball_subset_ball
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
#align metric.forall_of_forall_mem_closed_ball Metric.forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
#align metric.forall_of_forall_mem_ball Metric.forall_of_forall_mem_ball
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
#align metric.is_bounded_iff Metric.isBounded_iff
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_eventually Metric.isBounded_iff_eventually
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_exists_ge Metric.isBounded_iff_exists_ge
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
#align metric.is_bounded_iff_nndist Metric.isBounded_iff_nndist
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
#align metric.to_uniform_space_eq Metric.toUniformSpace_eq
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
#align metric.mk_uniformity_basis Metric.mk_uniformity_basis
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_rat Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_rat
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_pow Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_pow
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_lt Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_lt
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
#align metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
#align metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
#align metric.mem_uniformity_dist Metric.mem_uniformity_dist
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, id⟩
#align metric.dist_mem_uniformity Metric.dist_mem_uniformity
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.uniform_continuous_iff Metric.uniformContinuous_iff
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.uniform_continuous_on_iff Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
#align metric.uniform_continuous_on_iff_le Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff_le
nonrec theorem uniformInducing_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
uniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_dist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, gt_iff_lt, preimage_setOf_eq, Prod.map_apply, mem_setOf]
nonrec theorem uniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ := by
rw [uniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, uniformInducing_iff]
#align metric.uniform_embedding_iff Metric.uniformEmbedding_iff
/-- If a map between pseudometric spaces is a uniform embedding then the distance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`. -/
theorem controlled_of_uniformEmbedding [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : UniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (uniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
#align metric.controlled_of_uniform_embedding Metric.controlled_of_uniformEmbedding
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.totallyBounded_iff
#align metric.totally_bounded_iff Metric.totallyBounded_iff
/-- A pseudometric space is totally bounded if one can reconstruct up to any ε>0 any element of the
space from finitely many data. -/
theorem totallyBounded_of_finite_discretization {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ),
∃ (β : Type u) (_ : Fintype β) (F : s → β), ∀ x y, F x = F y → dist (x : α) y < ε) :
TotallyBounded s := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rw [hs]
exact totallyBounded_empty
rcases hs with ⟨x0, hx0⟩
haveI : Inhabited s := ⟨⟨x0, hx0⟩⟩
refine totallyBounded_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases H ε ε0 with ⟨β, fβ, F, hF⟩
let Finv := Function.invFun F
refine ⟨range (Subtype.val ∘ Finv), finite_range _, fun x xs => ?_⟩
let x' := Finv (F ⟨x, xs⟩)
have : F x' = F ⟨x, xs⟩ := Function.invFun_eq ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, ⟨F ⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩, hF _ _ this.symm⟩
#align metric.totally_bounded_of_finite_discretization Metric.totallyBounded_of_finite_discretization
theorem finite_approx_of_totallyBounded {s : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε := by
intro ε ε_pos
rw [totallyBounded_iff_subset] at hs
exact hs _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε_pos)
#align metric.finite_approx_of_totally_bounded Metric.finite_approx_of_totallyBounded
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `dist` -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter β} :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n : ι × β in p ×ˢ p', dist (f n.snd) (F n.fst n.snd) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hn => hε hn
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_iff Metric.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, dist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
#align metric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on_iff Metric.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, dist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (dist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_on_iff Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, dist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, nhdsWithin_univ,
mem_univ, forall_const, exists_prop]
#align metric.tendsto_locally_uniformly_iff Metric.tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `dist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, dist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff]
simp
#align metric.tendsto_uniformly_iff Metric.tendstoUniformly_iff
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, dist x y < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.cauchy_iff
#align metric.cauchy_iff Metric.cauchy_iff
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball Metric.nhds_basis_ball
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
#align metric.mem_nhds_iff Metric.mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
#align metric.eventually_nhds_iff Metric.eventually_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
#align metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball Metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ {x}, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ {i}, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
#align metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ {i}, pa i → ∀ {x}, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
#align metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff Metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
#align metric.nhds_basis_closed_ball Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ Metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos Metric.nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
#align metric.nhds_basis_ball_pow Metric.nhds_basis_ball_pow
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
#align metric.nhds_basis_closed_ball_pow Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall_pow
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
#align metric.is_open_iff Metric.isOpen_iff
theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
#align metric.is_open_ball Metric.isOpen_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
#align metric.ball_mem_nhds Metric.ball_mem_nhds
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds Metric.closedBall_mem_nhds
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds_of_mem Metric.closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
#align metric.nhds_within_basis_ball Metric.nhdsWithin_basis_ball
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
#align metric.mem_nhds_within_iff Metric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds_within Metric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and_iff]
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_within_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
#align metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_at_iff Metric.continuousAt_iff
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_within_at_iff Metric.continuousWithinAt_iff
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
#align metric.continuous_on_iff Metric.continuousOn_iff
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
#align metric.continuous_iff Metric.continuous_iff
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
#align metric.tendsto_nhds Metric.tendsto_nhds
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_at_iff' Metric.continuousAt_iff'
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
#align metric.continuous_within_at_iff' Metric.continuousWithinAt_iff'
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
#align metric.continuous_on_iff' Metric.continuousOn_iff'
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
#align metric.continuous_iff' Metric.continuous_iff'
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
#align metric.tendsto_at_top Metric.tendsto_atTop
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
#align metric.tendsto_at_top' Metric.tendsto_atTop'
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
#align metric.is_open_singleton_iff Metric.isOpen_singleton_iff
/-- Given a point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a pseudometric space, there is an open ball
centered at `x` and intersecting `s` only at `x`. -/
theorem exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete [DiscreteTopology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ ε > 0, Metric.ball x ε ∩ s = {x} :=
nhds_basis_ball.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align metric.exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete Metric.exists_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
/-- Given a point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a pseudometric space, there is a closed ball
of positive radius centered at `x` and intersecting `s` only at `x`. -/
theorem exists_closedBall_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ ε > 0, Metric.closedBall x ε ∩ s = {x} :=
nhds_basis_closedBall.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align metric.exists_closed_ball_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete Metric.exists_closedBall_inter_eq_singleton_of_discrete
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
#align dense.exists_dist_lt Dense.exists_dist_lt
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
#align dense_range.exists_dist_lt DenseRange.exists_dist_lt
end Metric
open Metric
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
#align metric.uniformity_edist Metric.uniformity_edist
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_pseudo_emetric_space PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace
/-- Expressing the uniformity in terms of `edist` -/
@[deprecated _root_.uniformity_basis_edist]
protected theorem Metric.uniformity_basis_edist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
uniformity_basis_edist
#align pseudo_metric.uniformity_basis_edist Metric.uniformity_basis_edist
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
#align metric.eball_top_eq_univ Metric.eball_top_eq_univ
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align metric.emetric_ball Metric.emetric_ball
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_ball]
simp
#align metric.emetric_ball_nnreal Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
EMetric.closedBall x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = closedBall x ε := by
ext y; simp [edist_le_ofReal h]
#align metric.emetric_closed_ball Metric.emetric_closedBall
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} :
EMetric.closedBall x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_closedBall ε.coe_nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align metric.emetric_closed_ball_nnreal Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_top (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ⊤ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => edist_lt_top _ _
#align metric.emetric_ball_top Metric.emetric_ball_top
theorem Metric.inseparable_iff {x y : α} : Inseparable x y ↔ dist x y = 0 := by
rw [EMetric.inseparable_iff, edist_nndist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
#align metric.inseparable_iff Metric.inseparable_iff
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled uniform structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given uniform structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_dist := H.trans PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist }
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_uniformity PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : m.replaceUniformity H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_uniformity_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq
-- ensure that the bornology is unchanged when replacing the uniformity.
example {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity m H).toBornology = m.toBornology := rfl
/-- Build a new pseudo metric space from an old one where the bundled topological structure is
provably (but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given topological structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : PseudoMetricSpace γ :=
@PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity γ (m.toUniformSpace.replaceTopology H) m rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_topology PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : m.replaceTopology H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_topology_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the pseudoemetric space. In this definition, the
distance is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the
push-forward of the edistance to reals. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist {α : Type u} [e : PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ) (edist_ne_top : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀ x y, dist x y = ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) : PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist := dist
dist_self x := by simp [h]
dist_comm x y := by simp [h, edist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
simp only [h]
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_add (edist_triangle _ _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _)
edist := edist
edist_dist _ _ := by simp only [h, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _)]
toUniformSpace := e.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := e.uniformity_edist.trans <| by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (edist_ne_top _ _), h]
using (Metric.uniformity_edist_aux fun x y : α => (edist x y).toNNReal).symm
#align pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space_of_dist PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the emetric space. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist (fun x y => ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) h fun _ _ =>
rfl
#align pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled bornology structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given bornology structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toBornology := B
cobounded_sets := Set.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 fun s =>
(H s).trans <| by rw [isBounded_iff, mem_setOf_eq, compl_compl] }
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_bornology PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq {α} [m : PseudoMetricSpace α] [B : Bornology α]
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology _ H = m := by
ext
rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space.replace_bornology_eq PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq
-- ensure that the uniformity is unchanged when replacing the bornology.
example {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology m H).toUniformSpace = m.toUniformSpace := rfl
section Real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a pseudometric space. -/
instance Real.pseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ where
dist x y := |x - y|
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero]
dist_comm x y := abs_sub_comm _ _
dist_triangle x y z := abs_sub_le _ _ _
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
#align real.pseudo_metric_space Real.pseudoMetricSpace
theorem Real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = |x - y| := rfl
#align real.dist_eq Real.dist_eq
theorem Real.nndist_eq (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (x - y) := rfl
#align real.nndist_eq Real.nndist_eq
theorem Real.nndist_eq' (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (y - x) :=
nndist_comm _ _
#align real.nndist_eq' Real.nndist_eq'
theorem Real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = |x| := by simp [Real.dist_eq]
#align real.dist_0_eq_abs Real.dist_0_eq_abs
theorem Real.sub_le_dist (x y : ℝ) : x - y ≤ dist x y := by
rw [Real.dist_eq, le_abs]
exact Or.inl (le_refl _)
theorem Real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y z : ℝ} (h : y ∈ uIcc x z) : dist x y ≤ dist x z := by
simpa only [dist_comm x] using abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc h
#align real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_left_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y z : ℝ} (h : y ∈ uIcc x z) : dist y z ≤ dist x z := by
simpa only [dist_comm _ z] using abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc h
#align real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_right_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc {x y x' y' : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ uIcc x' y') (hy : y ∈ uIcc x' y') :
dist x y ≤ dist x' y' :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc (by rwa [uIcc_comm]) (by rwa [uIcc_comm])
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc {x y x' y' : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc x' y') (hy : y ∈ Icc x' y') :
dist x y ≤ y' - x' := by
simpa only [Real.dist_eq, abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 <| hx.1.trans hx.2), neg_sub] using
Real.dist_le_of_mem_uIcc (Icc_subset_uIcc hx) (Icc_subset_uIcc hy)
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc
theorem Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
dist x y ≤ 1 := by simpa only [sub_zero] using Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc hx hy
#align real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01
instance : OrderTopology ℝ :=
orderTopology_of_nhds_abs fun x => by
simp only [nhds_basis_ball.eq_biInf, ball, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_comm]
theorem Real.ball_eq_Ioo (x r : ℝ) : ball x r = Ioo (x - r) (x + r) :=
Set.ext fun y => by
rw [mem_ball, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_lt_iff, mem_Ioo, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
sub_lt_comm]
#align real.ball_eq_Ioo Real.ball_eq_Ioo
theorem Real.closedBall_eq_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closedBall x r = Icc (x - r) (x + r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add',
sub_le_comm]
#align real.closed_ball_eq_Icc Real.closedBall_eq_Icc
theorem Real.Ioo_eq_ball (x y : ℝ) : Ioo x y = ball ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.ball_eq_Ioo, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
#align real.Ioo_eq_ball Real.Ioo_eq_ball
theorem Real.Icc_eq_closedBall (x y : ℝ) : Icc x y = closedBall ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
#align real.Icc_eq_closed_ball Real.Icc_eq_closedBall
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem; see `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'` for the
general case. -/
theorem squeeze_zero' {α} {f g : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (hf : ∀ᶠ t in t₀, 0 ≤ f t)
(hft : ∀ᶠ t in t₀, f t ≤ g t) (g0 : Tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds g0 hf hft
#align squeeze_zero' squeeze_zero'
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem; see `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le`
and `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'` for the general case. -/
theorem squeeze_zero {α} {f g : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (hf : ∀ t, 0 ≤ f t) (hft : ∀ t, f t ≤ g t)
(g0 : Tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall hf) (eventually_of_forall hft) g0
#align squeeze_zero squeeze_zero
theorem Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero :
𝓤 α = comap (fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
ext s
simp only [mem_uniformity_dist, (nhds_basis_ball.comap _).mem_iff]
simp [subset_def, Real.dist_0_eq_abs]
#align metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero
theorem cauchySeq_iff_tendsto_dist_atTop_0 [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ Tendsto (fun n : β × β => dist (u n.1) (u n.2)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto, Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, tendsto_comap_iff,
Function.comp_def]
simp_rw [Prod.map_apply]
#align cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto_dist_at_top_0 cauchySeq_iff_tendsto_dist_atTop_0
theorem tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : ι → α × α} {p : Filter ι} :
Tendsto f p (𝓤 α) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x).1 (f x).2) p (𝓝 0) := by
rw [Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h₁ : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a)) (h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
h₁.congr_uniformity <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
#align filter.tendsto.congr_dist Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist
alias tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist := Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist
#align tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist
theorem tendsto_iff_of_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
Uniform.tendsto_congr <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
#align tendsto_iff_of_dist tendsto_iff_of_dist
/-- If `u` is a neighborhood of `x`, then for small enough `r`, the closed ball
`Metric.closedBall x r` is contained in `u`. -/
theorem eventually_closedBall_subset {x : α} {u : Set α} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ r in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), closedBall x r ⊆ u := by
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε, 0 < ε ∧ closedBall x ε ⊆ u := nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.1 hu
have : Iic ε ∈ 𝓝 (0 : ℝ) := Iic_mem_nhds εpos
filter_upwards [this] with _ hr using Subset.trans (closedBall_subset_closedBall hr) hε
#align eventually_closed_ball_subset eventually_closedBall_subset
theorem tendsto_closedBall_smallSets (x : α) : Tendsto (closedBall x) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 x).smallSets :=
tendsto_smallSets_iff.2 fun _ ↦ eventually_closedBall_subset
end Real
/-- Pseudometric space structure pulled back by a function. -/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoMetricSpace β) :
PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist x y := dist (f x) (f y)
dist_self x := dist_self _
dist_comm x y := dist_comm _ _
dist_triangle x y z := dist_triangle _ _ _
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_dist x y := edist_dist _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := (uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).eq_biInf
toBornology := Bornology.induced f
cobounded_sets := Set.ext fun s => mem_comap_iff_compl.trans <| by
simp only [← isBounded_def, isBounded_iff, forall_mem_image, mem_setOf]
#align pseudo_metric_space.induced PseudoMetricSpace.induced
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by an inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `TopologicalSpace`
structure. -/
def Inducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β} [TopologicalSpace α] [m : PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Inducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceTopology (.induced f m) hf.induced
#align inducing.comap_pseudo_metric_space Inducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by a uniform inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `UniformSpace`
structure. -/
def UniformInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β} [UniformSpace α] [m : PseudoMetricSpace β]
(f : α → β) (h : UniformInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceUniformity (.induced f m) h.comap_uniformity.symm
#align uniform_inducing.comap_pseudo_metric_space UniformInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace
instance Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace {p : α → Prop} : PseudoMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
#align subtype.pseudo_metric_space Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace
theorem Subtype.dist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : dist x y = dist (x : α) y :=
rfl
#align subtype.dist_eq Subtype.dist_eq
theorem Subtype.nndist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : nndist x y = nndist (x : α) y :=
rfl
#align subtype.nndist_eq Subtype.nndist_eq
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : dist (unop x) (unop y) = dist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.dist_unop MulOpposite.dist_unop
#align add_opposite.dist_unop AddOpposite.dist_unop
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_op (x y : α) : dist (op x) (op y) = dist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.dist_op MulOpposite.dist_op
#align add_opposite.dist_op AddOpposite.dist_op
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : nndist (unop x) (unop y) = nndist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.nndist_unop MulOpposite.nndist_unop
#align add_opposite.nndist_unop AddOpposite.nndist_unop
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_op (x y : α) : nndist (op x) (op y) = nndist x y := rfl
#align mul_opposite.nndist_op MulOpposite.nndist_op
#align add_opposite.nndist_op AddOpposite.nndist_op
end MulOpposite
section NNReal
instance : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ≥0 := Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace
theorem NNReal.dist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : dist a b = |(a : ℝ) - b| := rfl
#align nnreal.dist_eq NNReal.dist_eq
theorem NNReal.nndist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : nndist a b = max (a - b) (b - a) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ => by
simp only [max_le_iff, tsub_le_iff_right (α := ℝ≥0)]
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nndist, dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff,
tsub_le_iff_right, NNReal.coe_add]
#align nnreal.nndist_eq NNReal.nndist_eq
@[simp]
theorem NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist 0 z = z := by
simp only [NNReal.nndist_eq, max_eq_right, tsub_zero, zero_tsub, zero_le']
#align nnreal.nndist_zero_eq_val NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val
@[simp]
theorem NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val' (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist z 0 = z := by
rw [nndist_comm]
exact NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val z
#align nnreal.nndist_zero_eq_val' NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val'
theorem NNReal.le_add_nndist (a b : ℝ≥0) : a ≤ b + nndist a b := by
suffices (a : ℝ) ≤ (b : ℝ) + dist a b by
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_nndist]
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact le_of_abs_le (dist_eq a b).ge
#align nnreal.le_add_nndist NNReal.le_add_nndist
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Ico 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico (c : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Ico 0 c.toNNReal := by
by_cases c_pos : 0 < c
· convert NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' ⟨c, c_pos.le⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_pos.le]
simp [not_lt.mp c_pos]
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Icc 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc {c : ℝ} (c_nn : 0 ≤ c) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Icc 0 c.toNNReal := by
convert NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' ⟨c, c_nn⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_nn]
end NNReal
section ULift
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (ULift β) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced ULift.down ‹_›
theorem ULift.dist_eq (x y : ULift β) : dist x y = dist x.down y.down := rfl
#align ulift.dist_eq ULift.dist_eq
theorem ULift.nndist_eq (x y : ULift β) : nndist x y = nndist x.down y.down := rfl
#align ulift.nndist_eq ULift.nndist_eq
@[simp]
theorem ULift.dist_up_up (x y : β) : dist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = dist x y := rfl
#align ulift.dist_up_up ULift.dist_up_up
@[simp]
theorem ULift.nndist_up_up (x y : β) : nndist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = nndist x y := rfl
#align ulift.nndist_up_up ULift.nndist_up_up
end ULift
section Prod
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
-- Porting note: added `let`, otherwise `simp` failed
instance Prod.pseudoMetricSpaceMax : PseudoMetricSpace (α × β) :=
let i := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
(fun x y : α × β => dist x.1 y.1 ⊔ dist x.2 y.2)
(fun x y => (max_lt (edist_lt_top _ _) (edist_lt_top _ _)).ne) fun x y => by
simp only [sup_eq_max, dist_edist, ← ENNReal.toReal_max (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _),
Prod.edist_eq]
i.replaceBornology fun s => by
simp only [← isBounded_image_fst_and_snd, isBounded_iff_eventually, forall_mem_image, ←
eventually_and, ← forall_and, ← max_le_iff]
rfl
#align prod.pseudo_metric_space_max Prod.pseudoMetricSpaceMax
theorem Prod.dist_eq {x y : α × β} : dist x y = max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) := rfl
#align prod.dist_eq Prod.dist_eq
@[simp]
theorem dist_prod_same_left {x : α} {y₁ y₂ : β} : dist (x, y₁) (x, y₂) = dist y₁ y₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
#align dist_prod_same_left dist_prod_same_left
@[simp]
theorem dist_prod_same_right {x₁ x₂ : α} {y : β} : dist (x₁, y) (x₂, y) = dist x₁ x₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
#align dist_prod_same_right dist_prod_same_right
theorem ball_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) : ball x r ×ˢ ball y r = ball (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
#align ball_prod_same ball_prod_same
theorem closedBall_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r ×ˢ closedBall y r = closedBall (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
#align closed_ball_prod_same closedBall_prod_same
theorem sphere_prod (x : α × β) (r : ℝ) :
sphere x r = sphere x.1 r ×ˢ closedBall x.2 r ∪ closedBall x.1 r ×ˢ sphere x.2 r := by
obtain hr | rfl | hr := lt_trichotomy r 0
· simp [hr]
· cases x
simp_rw [← closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos le_rfl, union_self, closedBall_prod_same]
· ext ⟨x', y'⟩
simp_rw [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_prod, Metric.mem_closedBall, Metric.mem_sphere, Prod.dist_eq,
max_eq_iff]
refine or_congr (and_congr_right ?_) (and_comm.trans (and_congr_left ?_))
all_goals rintro rfl; rfl
#align sphere_prod sphere_prod
end Prod
-- Porting note: 3 new lemmas
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_left (x y z : α) : dist (dist x z) (dist y z) ≤ dist x y :=
abs_dist_sub_le ..
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_right (x y z : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x z) ≤ dist y z := by
simpa only [dist_comm x] using dist_dist_dist_le_left y z x
theorem dist_dist_dist_le (x y x' y' : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x' y') ≤ dist x x' + dist y y' :=
(dist_triangle _ _ _).trans <|
add_le_add (dist_dist_dist_le_left _ _ _) (dist_dist_dist_le_right _ _ _)
theorem uniformContinuous_dist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2 :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a b} h =>
calc dist (dist a.1 a.2) (dist b.1 b.2) ≤ dist a.1 b.1 + dist a.2 b.2 :=
dist_dist_dist_le _ _ _ _
_ ≤ dist a b + dist a b := add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
_ < ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_lt_add h h
_ = ε := add_halves ε⟩
#align uniform_continuous_dist uniformContinuous_dist
protected theorem UniformContinuous.dist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_dist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align uniform_continuous.dist UniformContinuous.dist
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_dist : Continuous fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_dist.continuous
#align continuous_dist continuous_dist
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_dist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
#align continuous.dist Continuous.dist
protected theorem Filter.Tendsto.dist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (dist a b)) :=
(continuous_dist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
#align filter.tendsto.dist Filter.Tendsto.dist
theorem nhds_comap_dist (a : α) : ((𝓝 (0 : ℝ)).comap (dist · a)) = 𝓝 a := by
simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity α, Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, comap_comap,
(· ∘ ·), dist_comm]
#align nhds_comap_dist nhds_comap_dist
theorem tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a : α} :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun b => dist (f b) a) x (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← nhds_comap_dist a, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
#align tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero
theorem continuous_iff_continuous_dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous fun x : β × β => dist (f x.1) (f x.2) :=
⟨fun h => h.fst'.dist h.snd', fun h =>
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 <|
(h.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)).tendsto' _ _ <| dist_self _⟩
#align continuous_iff_continuous_dist continuous_iff_continuous_dist
theorem uniformContinuous_nndist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_dist.subtype_mk _
#align uniform_continuous_nndist uniformContinuous_nndist
protected theorem UniformContinuous.nndist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align uniform_continuous.nndist UniformContinuous.nndist
theorem continuous_nndist : Continuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.continuous
#align continuous_nndist continuous_nndist
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.nndist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_nndist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
#align continuous.nndist Continuous.nndist
protected theorem Filter.Tendsto.nndist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => nndist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (nndist a b)) :=
(continuous_nndist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
#align filter.tendsto.nndist Filter.Tendsto.nndist
namespace Metric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_ball : IsClosed (closedBall x ε) :=
isClosed_le (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.is_closed_ball Metric.isClosed_ball
theorem isClosed_sphere : IsClosed (sphere x ε) :=
isClosed_eq (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.is_closed_sphere Metric.isClosed_sphere
@[simp]
theorem closure_closedBall : closure (closedBall x ε) = closedBall x ε :=
isClosed_ball.closure_eq
#align metric.closure_closed_ball Metric.closure_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem closure_sphere : closure (sphere x ε) = sphere x ε :=
isClosed_sphere.closure_eq
#align metric.closure_sphere Metric.closure_sphere
theorem closure_ball_subset_closedBall : closure (ball x ε) ⊆ closedBall x ε :=
closure_minimal ball_subset_closedBall isClosed_ball
#align metric.closure_ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.closure_ball_subset_closedBall
theorem frontier_ball_subset_sphere : frontier (ball x ε) ⊆ sphere x ε :=
frontier_lt_subset_eq (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.frontier_ball_subset_sphere Metric.frontier_ball_subset_sphere
theorem frontier_closedBall_subset_sphere : frontier (closedBall x ε) ⊆ sphere x ε :=
frontier_le_subset_eq (continuous_id.dist continuous_const) continuous_const
#align metric.frontier_closed_ball_subset_sphere Metric.frontier_closedBall_subset_sphere
theorem ball_subset_interior_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ interior (closedBall x ε) :=
interior_maximal ball_subset_closedBall isOpen_ball
#align metric.ball_subset_interior_closed_ball Metric.ball_subset_interior_closedBall
/-- ε-characterization of the closure in pseudometric spaces-/
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm]
#align metric.mem_closure_iff Metric.mem_closure_iff
theorem mem_closure_range_iff {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < ε := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
#align metric.mem_closure_range_iff Metric.mem_closure_range_iff
theorem mem_closure_range_iff_nat {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1) :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ).trans <| by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm, exists_range_iff, forall_const]
#align metric.mem_closure_range_iff_nat Metric.mem_closure_range_iff_nat
theorem mem_of_closed' {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {a : α} :
a ∈ s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε := by
simpa only [hs.closure_eq] using @mem_closure_iff _ _ s a
#align metric.mem_of_closed' Metric.mem_of_closed'
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : α) : closedBall x 0 = closure {x} :=
Subset.antisymm
(fun _y hy =>
mem_closure_iff.2 fun _ε ε0 => ⟨x, mem_singleton x, (mem_closedBall.1 hy).trans_lt ε0⟩)
(closure_minimal (singleton_subset_iff.2 (dist_self x).le) isClosed_ball)
#align metric.closed_ball_zero' Metric.closedBall_zero'
lemma eventually_isCompact_closedBall [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ r in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), IsCompact (closedBall x r) := by
rcases exists_compact_mem_nhds x with ⟨s, s_compact, hs⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_closedBall_subset hs] with r hr
exact IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset s_compact isClosed_ball hr
lemma exists_isCompact_closedBall [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace α] (x : α) :
∃ r, 0 < r ∧ IsCompact (closedBall x r) := by
have : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[>] 0, IsCompact (closedBall x r) :=
eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds (eventually_isCompact_closedBall x)
simpa only [and_comm] using (this.and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
theorem dense_iff {s : Set α} : Dense s ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, (ball x r ∩ s).Nonempty :=
forall_congr' fun x => by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_ball', and_comm]
#align metric.dense_iff Metric.dense_iff
theorem denseRange_iff {f : β → α} : DenseRange f ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, ∃ y, dist x (f y) < r :=
forall_congr' fun x => by simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
#align metric.dense_range_iff Metric.denseRange_iff
-- Porting note: `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace` moved to `EMetricSpace`
/-- The preimage of a separable set by an inducing map is separable. -/
protected theorem _root_.Inducing.isSeparable_preimage {f : β → α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : Inducing f) {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : IsSeparable (f ⁻¹' s) := by
have : SeparableSpace s := hs.separableSpace
have : SecondCountableTopology s := UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable _
have : Inducing ((mapsTo_preimage f s).restrict _ _ _) :=
(hf.comp inducing_subtype_val).codRestrict _
have := this.secondCountableTopology
exact .of_subtype _
#align inducing.is_separable_preimage Inducing.isSeparable_preimage
protected theorem _root_.Embedding.isSeparable_preimage {f : β → α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : Embedding f) {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : IsSeparable (f ⁻¹' s) :=
hf.toInducing.isSeparable_preimage hs
#align embedding.is_separable_preimage Embedding.isSeparable_preimage
/-- If a map is continuous on a separable set `s`, then the image of `s` is also separable. -/
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.isSeparable_image [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsSeparable s) : IsSeparable (f '' s) := by
rw [image_eq_range, ← image_univ]
exact (isSeparable_univ_iff.2 hs.separableSpace).image hf.restrict
#align continuous_on.is_separable_image ContinuousOn.isSeparable_image
end Metric
/-- A compact set is separable. -/
theorem IsCompact.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : IsSeparable s :=
haveI : CompactSpace s := isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp hs
.of_subtype s
#align is_compact.is_separable IsCompact.isSeparable
section Pi
open Finset
variable {π : β → Type*} [Fintype β] [∀ b, PseudoMetricSpace (π b)]
/-- A finite product of pseudometric spaces is a pseudometric space, with the sup distance. -/
instance pseudoMetricSpacePi : PseudoMetricSpace (∀ b, π b) := by
/- we construct the instance from the pseudoemetric space instance to avoid checking again that
the uniformity is the same as the product uniformity, but we register nevertheless a nice
formula for the distance -/
let i := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
(fun f g : ∀ b, π b => ((sup univ fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ))
(fun f g => ((Finset.sup_lt_iff bot_lt_top).2 fun b _ => edist_lt_top _ _).ne)
(fun f g => by
simp only [edist_pi_def, edist_nndist, ← ENNReal.coe_finset_sup, ENNReal.coe_toReal])
refine i.replaceBornology fun s => ?_
simp only [← isBounded_def, isBounded_iff_eventually, ← forall_isBounded_image_eval_iff,
forall_mem_image, ← Filter.eventually_all, Function.eval_apply, @dist_nndist (π _)]
refine eventually_congr ((eventually_ge_atTop 0).mono fun C hC ↦ ?_)
lift C to ℝ≥0 using hC
refine ⟨fun H x hx y hy ↦ NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 <| Finset.sup_le fun b _ ↦ H b hx hy,
fun H b x hx y hy ↦ NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 ?_⟩
simpa only using Finset.sup_le_iff.1 (NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| H hx hy) b (Finset.mem_univ b)
#align pseudo_metric_space_pi pseudoMetricSpacePi
theorem nndist_pi_def (f g : ∀ b, π b) : nndist f g = sup univ fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
NNReal.eq rfl
#align nndist_pi_def nndist_pi_def
theorem dist_pi_def (f g : ∀ b, π b) : dist f g = (sup univ fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) : ℝ≥0) :=
rfl
#align dist_pi_def dist_pi_def
theorem nndist_pi_le_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ≥0} :
nndist f g ≤ r ↔ ∀ b, nndist (f b) (g b) ≤ r := by simp [nndist_pi_def]
#align nndist_pi_le_iff nndist_pi_le_iff
theorem nndist_pi_lt_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) :
nndist f g < r ↔ ∀ b, nndist (f b) (g b) < r := by
rw [← bot_eq_zero'] at hr
simp [nndist_pi_def, Finset.sup_lt_iff hr]
#align nndist_pi_lt_iff nndist_pi_lt_iff
theorem nndist_pi_eq_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) :
nndist f g = r ↔ (∃ i, nndist (f i) (g i) = r) ∧ ∀ b, nndist (f b) (g b) ≤ r := by
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, nndist_pi_lt_iff hr, nndist_pi_le_iff, not_forall, and_comm]
simp_rw [not_lt, and_congr_left_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
intro h
refine exists_congr fun b => ?_
apply (and_iff_right <| h _).symm
#align nndist_pi_eq_iff nndist_pi_eq_iff
theorem dist_pi_lt_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
dist f g < r ↔ ∀ b, dist (f b) (g b) < r := by
lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr.le
exact nndist_pi_lt_iff hr
#align dist_pi_lt_iff dist_pi_lt_iff
theorem dist_pi_le_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
dist f g ≤ r ↔ ∀ b, dist (f b) (g b) ≤ r := by
lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
exact nndist_pi_le_iff
#align dist_pi_le_iff dist_pi_le_iff
theorem dist_pi_eq_iff {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
dist f g = r ↔ (∃ i, dist (f i) (g i) = r) ∧ ∀ b, dist (f b) (g b) ≤ r := by
lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr.le
simp_rw [← coe_nndist, NNReal.coe_inj, nndist_pi_eq_iff hr, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align dist_pi_eq_iff dist_pi_eq_iff
theorem dist_pi_le_iff' [Nonempty β] {f g : ∀ b, π b} {r : ℝ} :
dist f g ≤ r ↔ ∀ b, dist (f b) (g b) ≤ r := by
by_cases hr : 0 ≤ r
· exact dist_pi_le_iff hr
· exact iff_of_false (fun h => hr <| dist_nonneg.trans h) fun h =>
hr <| dist_nonneg.trans <| h <| Classical.arbitrary _
#align dist_pi_le_iff' dist_pi_le_iff'
theorem dist_pi_const_le (a b : α) : (dist (fun _ : β => a) fun _ => b) ≤ dist a b :=
(dist_pi_le_iff dist_nonneg).2 fun _ => le_rfl
#align dist_pi_const_le dist_pi_const_le
theorem nndist_pi_const_le (a b : α) : (nndist (fun _ : β => a) fun _ => b) ≤ nndist a b :=
nndist_pi_le_iff.2 fun _ => le_rfl
#align nndist_pi_const_le nndist_pi_const_le
@[simp]
theorem dist_pi_const [Nonempty β] (a b : α) : (dist (fun _ : β => a) fun _ => b) = dist a b := by
simpa only [dist_edist] using congr_arg ENNReal.toReal (edist_pi_const a b)
#align dist_pi_const dist_pi_const
@[simp]
theorem nndist_pi_const [Nonempty β] (a b : α) :
(nndist (fun _ : β => a) fun _ => b) = nndist a b :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_pi_const a b
#align nndist_pi_const nndist_pi_const
theorem nndist_le_pi_nndist (f g : ∀ b, π b) (b : β) : nndist (f b) (g b) ≤ nndist f g := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ← edist_nndist, ← edist_nndist]
exact edist_le_pi_edist f g b
#align nndist_le_pi_nndist nndist_le_pi_nndist
theorem dist_le_pi_dist (f g : ∀ b, π b) (b : β) : dist (f b) (g b) ≤ dist f g := by
simp only [dist_nndist, NNReal.coe_le_coe, nndist_le_pi_nndist f g b]
#align dist_le_pi_dist dist_le_pi_dist
/-- An open ball in a product space is a product of open balls. See also `ball_pi'`
for a version assuming `Nonempty β` instead of `0 < r`. -/
theorem ball_pi (x : ∀ b, π b) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball x r = Set.pi univ fun b => ball (x b) r := by
ext p
simp [dist_pi_lt_iff hr]
#align ball_pi ball_pi
/-- An open ball in a product space is a product of open balls. See also `ball_pi`
for a version assuming `0 < r` instead of `Nonempty β`. -/
theorem ball_pi' [Nonempty β] (x : ∀ b, π b) (r : ℝ) :
ball x r = Set.pi univ fun b => ball (x b) r :=
(lt_or_le 0 r).elim (ball_pi x) fun hr => by simp [ball_eq_empty.2 hr]
#align ball_pi' ball_pi'
/-- A closed ball in a product space is a product of closed balls. See also `closedBall_pi'`
for a version assuming `Nonempty β` instead of `0 ≤ r`. -/
theorem closedBall_pi (x : ∀ b, π b) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall x r = Set.pi univ fun b => closedBall (x b) r := by
ext p
simp [dist_pi_le_iff hr]
#align closed_ball_pi closedBall_pi
/-- A closed ball in a product space is a product of closed balls. See also `closedBall_pi`
for a version assuming `0 ≤ r` instead of `Nonempty β`. -/
theorem closedBall_pi' [Nonempty β] (x : ∀ b, π b) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r = Set.pi univ fun b => closedBall (x b) r :=
(le_or_lt 0 r).elim (closedBall_pi x) fun hr => by simp [closedBall_eq_empty.2 hr]
#align closed_ball_pi' closedBall_pi'
/-- A sphere in a product space is a union of spheres on each component restricted to the closed
ball. -/
theorem sphere_pi (x : ∀ b, π b) {r : ℝ} (h : 0 < r ∨ Nonempty β) :
sphere x r = (⋃ i : β, Function.eval i ⁻¹' sphere (x i) r) ∩ closedBall x r := by
obtain hr | rfl | hr := lt_trichotomy r 0
· simp [hr]
· rw [closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos le_rfl, eq_comm, Set.inter_eq_right]
letI := h.resolve_left (lt_irrefl _)
inhabit β
refine subset_iUnion_of_subset default ?_
intro x hx
replace hx := hx.le
rw [dist_pi_le_iff le_rfl] at hx
exact le_antisymm (hx default) dist_nonneg
· ext
simp [dist_pi_eq_iff hr, dist_pi_le_iff hr.le]
#align sphere_pi sphere_pi
@[simp]
theorem Fin.nndist_insertNth_insertNth {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, PseudoMetricSpace (α i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x y : α i) (f g : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)) :
nndist (i.insertNth x f) (i.insertNth y g) = max (nndist x y) (nndist f g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [nndist_pi_le_iff, i.forall_iff_succAbove]
#align fin.nndist_insert_nth_insert_nth Fin.nndist_insertNth_insertNth
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PseudoMetric.lean | 2,039 | 2,042 | theorem Fin.dist_insertNth_insertNth {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, PseudoMetricSpace (α i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x y : α i) (f g : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)) :
dist (i.insertNth x f) (i.insertNth y g) = max (dist x y) (dist f g) := by |
simp only [dist_nndist, Fin.nndist_insertNth_insertNth, NNReal.coe_max]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
#align_import order.circular from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# Circular order hierarchy
This file defines circular preorders, circular partial orders and circular orders.
## Hierarchy
* A ternary "betweenness" relation `btw : α → α → α → Prop` forms a `CircularOrder` if it is
- reflexive: `btw a a a`
- cyclic: `btw a b c → btw b c a`
- antisymmetric: `btw a b c → btw c b a → a = b ∨ b = c ∨ c = a`
- total: `btw a b c ∨ btw c b a`
along with a strict betweenness relation `sbtw : α → α → α → Prop` which respects
`sbtw a b c ↔ btw a b c ∧ ¬ btw c b a`, analogously to how `<` and `≤` are related, and is
- transitive: `sbtw a b c → sbtw b d c → sbtw a d c`.
* A `CircularPartialOrder` drops totality.
* A `CircularPreorder` further drops antisymmetry.
The intuition is that a circular order is a circle and `btw a b c` means that going around
clockwise from `a` you reach `b` before `c` (`b` is between `a` and `c` is meaningless on an
unoriented circle). A circular partial order is several, potentially intersecting, circles. A
circular preorder is like a circular partial order, but several points can coexist.
Note that the relations between `CircularPreorder`, `CircularPartialOrder` and `CircularOrder`
are subtler than between `Preorder`, `PartialOrder`, `LinearOrder`. In particular, one cannot
simply extend the `btw` of a `CircularPartialOrder` to make it a `CircularOrder`.
One can translate from usual orders to circular ones by "closing the necklace at infinity". See
`LE.toBtw` and `LT.toSBtw`. Going the other way involves "cutting the necklace" or
"rolling the necklace open".
## Examples
Some concrete circular orders one encounters in the wild are `ZMod n` for `0 < n`, `Circle`,
`Real.Angle`...
## Main definitions
* `Set.cIcc`: Closed-closed circular interval.
* `Set.cIoo`: Open-open circular interval.
## Notes
There's an unsolved diamond on `OrderDual α` here. The instances `LE α → Btw αᵒᵈ` and
`LT α → SBtw αᵒᵈ` can each be inferred in two ways:
* `LE α` → `Btw α` → `Btw αᵒᵈ` vs
`LE α` → `LE αᵒᵈ` → `Btw αᵒᵈ`
* `LT α` → `SBtw α` → `SBtw αᵒᵈ` vs
`LT α` → `LT αᵒᵈ` → `SBtw αᵒᵈ`
The fields are propeq, but not defeq. It is temporarily fixed by turning the circularizing instances
into definitions.
## TODO
Antisymmetry is quite weak in the sense that there's no way to discriminate which two points are
equal. This prevents defining closed-open intervals `cIco` and `cIoc` in the neat `=`-less way. We
currently haven't defined them at all.
What is the correct generality of "rolling the necklace" open? At least, this works for `α × β` and
`β × α` where `α` is a circular order and `β` is a linear order.
What's next is to define circular groups and provide instances for `ZMod n`, the usual circle group
`Circle`, and `RootsOfUnity M`. What conditions do we need on `M` for this last one
to work?
We should have circular order homomorphisms. The typical example is
`days_to_month : days_of_the_year →c months_of_the_year` which relates the circular order of days
and the circular order of months. Is `α →c β` a good notation?
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_order
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_cyclic_order
## Tags
circular order, cyclic order, circularly ordered set, cyclically ordered set
-/
/-- Syntax typeclass for a betweenness relation. -/
class Btw (α : Type*) where
/-- Betweenness for circular orders. `btw a b c` states that `b` is between `a` and `c` (in that
order). -/
btw : α → α → α → Prop
#align has_btw Btw
export Btw (btw)
/-- Syntax typeclass for a strict betweenness relation. -/
class SBtw (α : Type*) where
/-- Strict betweenness for circular orders. `sbtw a b c` states that `b` is strictly between `a`
and `c` (in that order). -/
sbtw : α → α → α → Prop
#align has_sbtw SBtw
export SBtw (sbtw)
/-- A circular preorder is the analogue of a preorder where you can loop around. `≤` and `<` are
replaced by ternary relations `btw` and `sbtw`. `btw` is reflexive and cyclic. `sbtw` is transitive.
-/
class CircularPreorder (α : Type*) extends Btw α, SBtw α where
/-- `a` is between `a` and `a`. -/
btw_refl (a : α) : btw a a a
/-- If `b` is between `a` and `c`, then `c` is between `b` and `a`.
This is motivated by imagining three points on a circle. -/
btw_cyclic_left {a b c : α} : btw a b c → btw b c a
sbtw := fun a b c => btw a b c ∧ ¬btw c b a
/-- Strict betweenness is given by betweenness in one direction and non-betweenness in the other.
I.e., if `b` is between `a` and `c` but not between `c` and `a`, then we say `b` is strictly
between `a` and `c`. -/
sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw {a b c : α} : sbtw a b c ↔ btw a b c ∧ ¬btw c b a := by intros; rfl
/-- For any fixed `c`, `fun a b ↦ sbtw a b c` is a transitive relation.
I.e., given `a` `b` `d` `c` in that "order", if we have `b` strictly between `a` and `c`, and `d`
strictly between `b` and `c`, then `d` is strictly between `a` and `c`. -/
sbtw_trans_left {a b c d : α} : sbtw a b c → sbtw b d c → sbtw a d c
#align circular_preorder CircularPreorder
export CircularPreorder (btw_refl btw_cyclic_left sbtw_trans_left)
/-- A circular partial order is the analogue of a partial order where you can loop around. `≤` and
`<` are replaced by ternary relations `btw` and `sbtw`. `btw` is reflexive, cyclic and
antisymmetric. `sbtw` is transitive. -/
class CircularPartialOrder (α : Type*) extends CircularPreorder α where
/-- If `b` is between `a` and `c` and also between `c` and `a`, then at least one pair of points
among `a`, `b`, `c` are identical. -/
btw_antisymm {a b c : α} : btw a b c → btw c b a → a = b ∨ b = c ∨ c = a
#align circular_partial_order CircularPartialOrder
export CircularPartialOrder (btw_antisymm)
/-- A circular order is the analogue of a linear order where you can loop around. `≤` and `<` are
replaced by ternary relations `btw` and `sbtw`. `btw` is reflexive, cyclic, antisymmetric and total.
`sbtw` is transitive. -/
class CircularOrder (α : Type*) extends CircularPartialOrder α where
/-- For any triple of points, the second is between the other two one way or another. -/
btw_total : ∀ a b c : α, btw a b c ∨ btw c b a
#align circular_order CircularOrder
export CircularOrder (btw_total)
/-! ### Circular preorders -/
section CircularPreorder
variable {α : Type*} [CircularPreorder α]
theorem btw_rfl {a : α} : btw a a a :=
btw_refl _
#align btw_rfl btw_rfl
-- TODO: `alias` creates a def instead of a lemma (because `btw_cyclic_left` is a def).
-- alias btw_cyclic_left ← Btw.btw.cyclic_left
theorem Btw.btw.cyclic_left {a b c : α} (h : btw a b c) : btw b c a :=
btw_cyclic_left h
#align has_btw.btw.cyclic_left Btw.btw.cyclic_left
theorem btw_cyclic_right {a b c : α} (h : btw a b c) : btw c a b :=
h.cyclic_left.cyclic_left
#align btw_cyclic_right btw_cyclic_right
alias Btw.btw.cyclic_right := btw_cyclic_right
#align has_btw.btw.cyclic_right Btw.btw.cyclic_right
/-- The order of the `↔` has been chosen so that `rw [btw_cyclic]` cycles to the right while
`rw [← btw_cyclic]` cycles to the left (thus following the prepended arrow). -/
theorem btw_cyclic {a b c : α} : btw a b c ↔ btw c a b :=
⟨btw_cyclic_right, btw_cyclic_left⟩
#align btw_cyclic btw_cyclic
theorem sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw {a b c : α} : sbtw a b c ↔ btw a b c ∧ ¬btw c b a :=
CircularPreorder.sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw
#align sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw
theorem btw_of_sbtw {a b c : α} (h : sbtw a b c) : btw a b c :=
(sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw.1 h).1
#align btw_of_sbtw btw_of_sbtw
alias SBtw.sbtw.btw := btw_of_sbtw
#align has_sbtw.sbtw.btw SBtw.sbtw.btw
theorem not_btw_of_sbtw {a b c : α} (h : sbtw a b c) : ¬btw c b a :=
(sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw.1 h).2
#align not_btw_of_sbtw not_btw_of_sbtw
alias SBtw.sbtw.not_btw := not_btw_of_sbtw
#align has_sbtw.sbtw.not_btw SBtw.sbtw.not_btw
theorem not_sbtw_of_btw {a b c : α} (h : btw a b c) : ¬sbtw c b a := fun h' => h'.not_btw h
#align not_sbtw_of_btw not_sbtw_of_btw
alias Btw.btw.not_sbtw := not_sbtw_of_btw
#align has_btw.btw.not_sbtw Btw.btw.not_sbtw
theorem sbtw_of_btw_not_btw {a b c : α} (habc : btw a b c) (hcba : ¬btw c b a) : sbtw a b c :=
sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw.2 ⟨habc, hcba⟩
#align sbtw_of_btw_not_btw sbtw_of_btw_not_btw
alias Btw.btw.sbtw_of_not_btw := sbtw_of_btw_not_btw
#align has_btw.btw.sbtw_of_not_btw Btw.btw.sbtw_of_not_btw
theorem sbtw_cyclic_left {a b c : α} (h : sbtw a b c) : sbtw b c a :=
h.btw.cyclic_left.sbtw_of_not_btw fun h' => h.not_btw h'.cyclic_left
#align sbtw_cyclic_left sbtw_cyclic_left
alias SBtw.sbtw.cyclic_left := sbtw_cyclic_left
#align has_sbtw.sbtw.cyclic_left SBtw.sbtw.cyclic_left
theorem sbtw_cyclic_right {a b c : α} (h : sbtw a b c) : sbtw c a b :=
h.cyclic_left.cyclic_left
#align sbtw_cyclic_right sbtw_cyclic_right
alias SBtw.sbtw.cyclic_right := sbtw_cyclic_right
#align has_sbtw.sbtw.cyclic_right SBtw.sbtw.cyclic_right
/-- The order of the `↔` has been chosen so that `rw [sbtw_cyclic]` cycles to the right while
`rw [← sbtw_cyclic]` cycles to the left (thus following the prepended arrow). -/
theorem sbtw_cyclic {a b c : α} : sbtw a b c ↔ sbtw c a b :=
⟨sbtw_cyclic_right, sbtw_cyclic_left⟩
#align sbtw_cyclic sbtw_cyclic
-- TODO: `alias` creates a def instead of a lemma (because `sbtw_trans_left` is a def).
-- alias btw_trans_left ← SBtw.sbtw.trans_left
theorem SBtw.sbtw.trans_left {a b c d : α} (h : sbtw a b c) : sbtw b d c → sbtw a d c :=
sbtw_trans_left h
#align has_sbtw.sbtw.trans_left SBtw.sbtw.trans_left
theorem sbtw_trans_right {a b c d : α} (hbc : sbtw a b c) (hcd : sbtw a c d) : sbtw a b d :=
(hbc.cyclic_left.trans_left hcd.cyclic_left).cyclic_right
#align sbtw_trans_right sbtw_trans_right
alias SBtw.sbtw.trans_right := sbtw_trans_right
#align has_sbtw.sbtw.trans_right SBtw.sbtw.trans_right
theorem sbtw_asymm {a b c : α} (h : sbtw a b c) : ¬sbtw c b a :=
h.btw.not_sbtw
#align sbtw_asymm sbtw_asymm
alias SBtw.sbtw.not_sbtw := sbtw_asymm
#align has_sbtw.sbtw.not_sbtw SBtw.sbtw.not_sbtw
theorem sbtw_irrefl_left_right {a b : α} : ¬sbtw a b a := fun h => h.not_btw h.btw
#align sbtw_irrefl_left_right sbtw_irrefl_left_right
theorem sbtw_irrefl_left {a b : α} : ¬sbtw a a b := fun h => sbtw_irrefl_left_right h.cyclic_left
#align sbtw_irrefl_left sbtw_irrefl_left
theorem sbtw_irrefl_right {a b : α} : ¬sbtw a b b := fun h => sbtw_irrefl_left_right h.cyclic_right
#align sbtw_irrefl_right sbtw_irrefl_right
theorem sbtw_irrefl (a : α) : ¬sbtw a a a :=
sbtw_irrefl_left_right
#align sbtw_irrefl sbtw_irrefl
end CircularPreorder
/-! ### Circular partial orders -/
section CircularPartialOrder
variable {α : Type*} [CircularPartialOrder α]
-- TODO: `alias` creates a def instead of a lemma (because `btw_antisymm` is a def).
-- alias btw_antisymm ← Btw.btw.antisymm
theorem Btw.btw.antisymm {a b c : α} (h : btw a b c) : btw c b a → a = b ∨ b = c ∨ c = a :=
btw_antisymm h
#align has_btw.btw.antisymm Btw.btw.antisymm
end CircularPartialOrder
/-! ### Circular orders -/
section CircularOrder
variable {α : Type*} [CircularOrder α]
theorem btw_refl_left_right (a b : α) : btw a b a :=
or_self_iff.1 (btw_total a b a)
#align btw_refl_left_right btw_refl_left_right
theorem btw_rfl_left_right {a b : α} : btw a b a :=
btw_refl_left_right _ _
#align btw_rfl_left_right btw_rfl_left_right
theorem btw_refl_left (a b : α) : btw a a b :=
btw_rfl_left_right.cyclic_right
#align btw_refl_left btw_refl_left
theorem btw_rfl_left {a b : α} : btw a a b :=
btw_refl_left _ _
#align btw_rfl_left btw_rfl_left
theorem btw_refl_right (a b : α) : btw a b b :=
btw_rfl_left_right.cyclic_left
#align btw_refl_right btw_refl_right
theorem btw_rfl_right {a b : α} : btw a b b :=
btw_refl_right _ _
#align btw_rfl_right btw_rfl_right
theorem sbtw_iff_not_btw {a b c : α} : sbtw a b c ↔ ¬btw c b a := by
rw [sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp (btw_total _ _ _).resolve_left
#align sbtw_iff_not_btw sbtw_iff_not_btw
theorem btw_iff_not_sbtw {a b c : α} : btw a b c ↔ ¬sbtw c b a :=
iff_not_comm.1 sbtw_iff_not_btw
#align btw_iff_not_sbtw btw_iff_not_sbtw
end CircularOrder
/-! ### Circular intervals -/
namespace Set
section CircularPreorder
variable {α : Type*} [CircularPreorder α]
/-- Closed-closed circular interval -/
def cIcc (a b : α) : Set α :=
{ x | btw a x b }
#align set.cIcc Set.cIcc
/-- Open-open circular interval -/
def cIoo (a b : α) : Set α :=
{ x | sbtw a x b }
#align set.cIoo Set.cIoo
@[simp]
theorem mem_cIcc {a b x : α} : x ∈ cIcc a b ↔ btw a x b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_cIcc Set.mem_cIcc
@[simp]
theorem mem_cIoo {a b x : α} : x ∈ cIoo a b ↔ sbtw a x b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_cIoo Set.mem_cIoo
end CircularPreorder
section CircularOrder
variable {α : Type*} [CircularOrder α]
theorem left_mem_cIcc (a b : α) : a ∈ cIcc a b :=
btw_rfl_left
#align set.left_mem_cIcc Set.left_mem_cIcc
theorem right_mem_cIcc (a b : α) : b ∈ cIcc a b :=
btw_rfl_right
#align set.right_mem_cIcc Set.right_mem_cIcc
theorem compl_cIcc {a b : α} : (cIcc a b)ᶜ = cIoo b a := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_cIoo, sbtw_iff_not_btw, cIcc, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf]
#align set.compl_cIcc Set.compl_cIcc
| Mathlib/Order/Circular.lean | 374 | 376 | theorem compl_cIoo {a b : α} : (cIoo a b)ᶜ = cIcc b a := by |
ext
rw [Set.mem_cIcc, btw_iff_not_sbtw, cIoo, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.set.intervals.with_bot_top from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
/-!
# Intervals in `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
In this file we prove various lemmas about `Set.image`s and `Set.preimage`s of intervals under
`some : α → WithTop α` and `some : α → WithBot α`.
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### `WithTop` -/
namespace WithTop
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' {⊤} = (∅ : Set α) :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => coe_ne_top
#align with_top.preimage_coe_top WithTop.preimage_coe_top
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithTop α) = Iio ⊤ := by
ext x
rw [mem_Iio, WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, mem_range, ne_top_iff_exists]
#align with_top.range_coe WithTop.range_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ioi WithTop.preimage_coe_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ici WithTop.preimage_coe_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Iio WithTop.preimage_coe_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Iic WithTop.preimage_coe_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Icc WithTop.preimage_coe_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ico WithTop.preimage_coe_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ioc WithTop.preimage_coe_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ioo WithTop.preimage_coe_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio ⊤ = univ := by
rw [← range_coe, preimage_range]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Iio_top WithTop.preimage_coe_Iio_top
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a ⊤ = Ici a := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ico_top WithTop.preimage_coe_Ico_top
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a ⊤ = Ioi a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align with_top.preimage_coe_Ioo_top WithTop.preimage_coe_Ioo_top
theorem image_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioi a = Ioo (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align with_top.image_coe_Ioi WithTop.image_coe_Ioi
theorem image_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ici a = Ico (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ici_inter_Iio]
#align with_top.image_coe_Ici WithTop.image_coe_Ici
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/WithBotTop.lean | 97 | 99 | theorem image_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iio a = Iio (a : WithTop α) := by |
rw [← preimage_coe_Iio, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import number_theory.multiplicity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
_root_.map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
#align dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [geom_sum₂_comm, dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub]; simpa using h.neg_right
#align dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub'
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_self {x y : R} (h : ↑n ∣ x - y) :
↑n ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub h).mpr (dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align dvd_geom_sum₂_self dvd_geom_sum₂_self
theorem sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (p x : R) (n : ℕ) :
p ^ 2 ∣ (x + p) ^ n - x ^ (n - 1) * p * n - x ^ n := by
cases' n with n n
· simp only [pow_zero, Nat.cast_zero, sub_zero, sub_self, dvd_zero, Nat.zero_eq, mul_zero]
· simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, Nat.cast_succ, add_pow, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Nat.choose_self, Nat.succ_sub _, tsub_self, pow_one, Nat.choose_succ_self_right, pow_zero,
mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_left]
suffices p ^ 2 ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * p ^ (n + 1 - i) * ↑((n + 1).choose i) by
convert this; abel
apply Finset.dvd_sum
intro y hy
calc
p ^ 2 ∣ p ^ (n + 1 - y) :=
pow_dvd_pow p (le_tsub_of_add_le_left (by linarith [Finset.mem_range.mp hy]))
_ ∣ x ^ y * p ^ (n + 1 - y) * ↑((n + 1).choose y) :=
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left _ _) _
#align sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub
theorem not_dvd_geom_sum₂ {p : R} (hp : Prime p) (hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) (hn : ¬p ∣ n) :
¬p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := fun h =>
hx <|
hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow <| (hp.dvd_or_dvd <| (dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' hxy).mp h).resolve_left hn
#align not_dvd_geom_sum₂ not_dvd_geom_sum₂
variable {p : ℕ} (a b)
theorem odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub (hp : Odd p) :
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + p * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) - p * a ^ (p - 1) := by
have h1 : ∀ (i : ℕ),
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * i + a ^ i) := by
intro i
calc
↑p ^ 2 ∣ (↑p * b) ^ 2 := by simp only [mul_pow, dvd_mul_right]
_ ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) := by
simp only [sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (↑p * b) a i, ← sub_sub]
simp_rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at *
let s : R := (p : R)^2
calc
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (span {s})) (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + (p : R) * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range p,
mk (span {s}) ((a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, ← map_pow, h1, ← _root_.map_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x))) := by
ring_nf
simp only [← pow_add, map_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← map_sum]
congr
simp [pow_add a, mul_assoc]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ _x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 1)) := by
rw [add_right_inj]
have : ∀ (x : ℕ), (hx : x ∈ range p) → a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x)) = a ^ (p - 1) := by
intro x hx
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc _ x, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx)
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl this]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [add_right_inj, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s}) (↑p * b * ∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 2) * x) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [Finset.mul_sum, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_add]
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl]
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨x⟩) hx
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
· have : x.succ - 1 + (p - 1 - x.succ) = p - 2 := by
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx))]
exact congr_arg Nat.pred (Nat.add_sub_cancel_left _ _)
rw [this]
ring1
_ = mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
have : Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : R)) =
((Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : ℕ)))) := by simp only [Nat.cast_sum]
simp only [add_left_eq_self, ← Finset.mul_sum, this]
norm_cast
simp only [Finset.sum_range_id]
norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_mul, _root_.map_mul,
Nat.mul_div_assoc p (even_iff_two_dvd.mp (Nat.Odd.sub_odd hp odd_one))]
ring_nf
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left ?_ _
refine Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr ?_
simp [mem_span_singleton]
#align odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub
namespace multiplicity
section IntegralDomain
variable [IsDomain R] [@DecidableRel R (· ∣ ·)]
theorem pow_sub_pow_of_prime {p : R} (hp : Prime p) {x y : R} (hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x)
{n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) : multiplicity p (x ^ n - y ^ n) = multiplicity p (x - y) := by
rw [← geom_sum₂_mul, multiplicity.mul hp, multiplicity_eq_zero.2 (not_dvd_geom_sum₂ hp hxy hx hn),
zero_add]
#align multiplicity.pow_sub_pow_of_prime multiplicity.pow_sub_pow_of_prime
variable (hp : Prime (p : R)) (hp1 : Odd p) (hxy : ↑p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬↑p ∣ x)
theorem geom_sum₂_eq_one : multiplicity (↑p) (∑ i ∈ range p, x ^ i * y ^ (p - 1 - i)) = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one]
refine multiplicity.eq_coe_iff.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [pow_one]
exact dvd_geom_sum₂_self hxy
rw [dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub hxy] at hx
cases' hxy with k hk
rw [one_add_one_eq_two, eq_add_of_sub_eq' hk]
refine mt (dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub (@odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub _ _ y k _ hp1)).mp ?_
rw [pow_two, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hp.ne_zero]
exact mt hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hx
#align multiplicity.geom_sum₂_eq_one multiplicity.geom_sum₂_eq_one
theorem pow_prime_sub_pow_prime :
multiplicity (↑p) (x ^ p - y ^ p) = multiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + 1 := by
rw [← geom_sum₂_mul, multiplicity.mul hp, geom_sum₂_eq_one hp hp1 hxy hx, add_comm]
#align multiplicity.pow_prime_sub_pow_prime multiplicity.pow_prime_sub_pow_prime
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 181 | 189 | theorem pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow (a : ℕ) :
multiplicity (↑p) (x ^ p ^ a - y ^ p ^ a) = multiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + a := by |
induction' a with a h_ind
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, pow_zero, pow_one, pow_one]
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, ← add_assoc, ← h_ind, pow_succ, pow_mul, pow_mul]
apply pow_prime_sub_pow_prime hp hp1
· rw [← geom_sum₂_mul]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hxy _
· exact fun h => hx (hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow h)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
#align uniform_space_of_dist UniformSpace.ofDist
-- Porting note: dropped the `dist_self` argument
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun x hx y => hx.elim⟩ (fun s ⟨c, hc⟩ t h => ⟨c, fun x hx y hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
#align bornology.of_dist Bornology.ofDistₓ
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
dist : α → α → ℝ
#align has_dist Dist
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
#noalign pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist_tac -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore
/-- Pseudo metric and Metric spaces
A pseudo metric space is endowed with a distance for which the requirement `d(x,y)=0 → x = y` might
not hold. A metric space is a pseudo metric space such that `d(x,y)=0 → x = y`.
Each pseudo metric space induces a canonical `UniformSpace` and hence a canonical
`TopologicalSpace` This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `UniformSpace`
structure. When instantiating a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure, the uniformity fields are not
necessary, they will be filled in by default. In the same way, each (pseudo) metric space induces a
(pseudo) emetric space structure. It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
-/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends Dist α : Type u where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y)
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add := by _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space PseudoMetricSpace
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with d _ _ _ ed hed U hU B hB
cases' m' with d' _ _ _ ed' hed' U' hU' B' hB'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
#align pseudo_metric_space.ext PseudoMetricSpace.ext
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_edist PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
#align pseudo_metric_space.of_dist_topology PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
#align dist_self dist_self
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
#align dist_comm dist_comm
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
#align edist_dist edist_dist
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
#align dist_triangle dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_left dist_triangle_left
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_right dist_triangle_right
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
#align dist_triangle4 dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_left dist_triangle4_left
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_right dist_triangle4_right
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, dist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
dist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ dist (f m) (f n) + dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_dist dist_le_Ico_sum_dist
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align dist_le_range_sum_dist dist_le_range_sum_dist
/-- A version of `dist_le_Ico_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le
/-- A version of `dist_le_range_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
#align swap_dist swap_dist
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
#align abs_dist_sub_le abs_dist_sub_le
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
#align dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align abs_dist abs_dist
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
#align has_nndist NNDist
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_nndist PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
#align dist_nndist dist_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
#align coe_nndist coe_nndist
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align edist_nndist edist_nndist
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
#align nndist_edist nndist_edist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
#align coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
#align edist_lt_coe edist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align edist_le_coe edist_le_coe
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align edist_lt_top edist_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
#align edist_ne_top edist_ne_top
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
#align nndist_self nndist_self
-- Porting note: `dist_nndist` and `coe_nndist` moved up
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_lt_coe dist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_le_coe dist_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
#align edist_lt_of_real edist_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
#align edist_le_of_real edist_le_ofReal
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align nndist_dist nndist_dist
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
#align nndist_comm nndist_comm
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle nndist_triangle
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_left nndist_triangle_left
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_right nndist_triangle_right
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
#align dist_edist dist_edist
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
#align metric.ball Metric.ball
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_ball Metric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball' Metric.mem_ball'
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
#align metric.pos_of_mem_ball Metric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_ball_self Metric.mem_ball_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_ball Metric.nonempty_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
#align metric.ball_eq_empty Metric.ball_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
#align metric.ball_zero Metric.ball_zero
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball Metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
#align metric.ball_eq_ball Metric.ball_eq_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
#align metric.ball_eq_ball' Metric.ball_eq_ball'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_ball_nat
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat_succ Metric.iUnion_ball_nat_succ
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
#align metric.closed_ball Metric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_closed_ball Metric.mem_closedBall
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball' Metric.mem_closedBall'
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
#align metric.sphere Metric.sphere
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_sphere Metric.mem_sphere
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
#align metric.mem_sphere' Metric.mem_sphere'
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
#align metric.ne_of_mem_sphere Metric.ne_of_mem_sphere
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
#align metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere Metric.nonneg_of_mem_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_neg
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
#align metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
#align metric.sphere_is_empty_of_subsingleton Metric.sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_closed_ball_self Metric.mem_closedBall_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_closed_ball Metric.nonempty_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_empty Metric.closedBall_eq_empty
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
#align metric.closed_ball_eq_sphere_of_nonpos Metric.closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
#align metric.ball_subset_closed_ball Metric.ball_subset_closedBall
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
#align metric.sphere_subset_closed_ball Metric.sphere_subset_closedBall
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_ball
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
#align metric.ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_closedBall
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.ball_disjoint_ball Metric.ball_disjoint_ball
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
#align metric.closed_ball_disjoint_closed_ball Metric.closedBall_disjoint_closedBall
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
#align metric.sphere_disjoint_ball Metric.sphere_disjoint_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
#align metric.ball_union_sphere Metric.ball_union_sphere
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
#align metric.sphere_union_ball Metric.sphere_union_ball
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
#align metric.closed_ball_diff_sphere Metric.closedBall_diff_sphere
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PseudoMetric.lean | 576 | 577 | theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by |
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
#align_import data.nat.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals of naturals
This file proves that `ℕ` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
## TODO
Some lemmas can be generalized using `OrderedGroup`, `CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid` or `SuccOrder`
and subsequently be moved upstream to `Order.Interval.Finset`.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists Ring
open Finset Nat
variable (a b c : ℕ)
namespace Nat
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℕ where
finsetIcc a b := ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIco a b := ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoc a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finsetIoo a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
theorem Icc_eq_range' : Icc a b = ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Icc_eq_range' Nat.Icc_eq_range'
theorem Ico_eq_range' : Ico a b = ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ico_eq_range' Nat.Ico_eq_range'
theorem Ioc_eq_range' : Ioc a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioc_eq_range' Nat.Ioc_eq_range'
theorem Ioo_eq_range' : Ioo a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align nat.Ioo_eq_range' Nat.Ioo_eq_range'
theorem uIcc_eq_range' :
uIcc a b = ⟨List.range' (min a b) (max a b + 1 - min a b), List.nodup_range' _ _⟩ := rfl
#align nat.uIcc_eq_range' Nat.uIcc_eq_range'
theorem Iio_eq_range : Iio = range := by
ext b x
rw [mem_Iio, mem_range]
#align nat.Iio_eq_range Nat.Iio_eq_range
@[simp]
theorem Ico_zero_eq_range : Ico 0 = range := by rw [← Nat.bot_eq_zero, ← Iio_eq_Ico, Iio_eq_range]
#align nat.Ico_zero_eq_range Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range
lemma range_eq_Icc_zero_sub_one (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0): range n = Icc 0 (n - 1) := by
ext b
simp_all only [mem_Icc, zero_le, true_and, mem_range]
exact lt_iff_le_pred (zero_lt_of_ne_zero hn)
theorem _root_.Finset.range_eq_Ico : range = Ico 0 :=
Ico_zero_eq_range.symm
#align finset.range_eq_Ico Finset.range_eq_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = b + 1 - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Icc Nat.card_Icc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ico Nat.card_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = b - a :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioc Nat.card_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = b - a - 1 :=
List.length_range' _ _ _
#align nat.card_Ioo Nat.card_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : (uIcc a b).card = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_Icc _ _).trans $ by rw [← Int.natCast_inj, sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min, Int.ofNat_sub] <;> omega
#align nat.card_uIcc Nat.card_uIcc
@[simp]
lemma card_Iic : (Iic b).card = b + 1 := by rw [Iic_eq_Icc, card_Icc, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iic Nat.card_Iic
@[simp]
theorem card_Iio : (Iio b).card = b := by rw [Iio_eq_Ico, card_Ico, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
#align nat.card_Iio Nat.card_Iio
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIcc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Icc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Icc Nat.card_fintypeIcc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIco : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ico]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ico Nat.card_fintypeIco
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = b - a := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioc]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioc Nat.card_fintypeIoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Ioo]
#align nat.card_fintype_Ioo Nat.card_fintypeIoo
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIic : Fintype.card (Set.Iic b) = b + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Iic]
#align nat.card_fintype_Iic Nat.card_fintypeIic
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIio : Fintype.card (Set.Iio b) = b := by rw [Fintype.card_ofFinset, card_Iio]
#align nat.card_fintype_Iio Nat.card_fintypeIio
-- TODO@Yaël: Generalize all the following lemmas to `SuccOrder`
theorem Icc_succ_left : Icc a.succ b = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff]
#align nat.Icc_succ_left Nat.Icc_succ_left
theorem Ico_succ_right : Ico a b.succ = Icc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Icc, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_right Nat.Ico_succ_right
theorem Ico_succ_left : Ico a.succ b = Ioo a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, succ_le_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_left Nat.Ico_succ_left
theorem Icc_pred_right {b : ℕ} (h : 0 < b) : Icc a (b - 1) = Ico a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ico, lt_iff_le_pred h]
#align nat.Icc_pred_right Nat.Icc_pred_right
theorem Ico_succ_succ : Ico a.succ b.succ = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
#align nat.Ico_succ_succ Nat.Ico_succ_succ
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_singleton : Ico a (a + 1) = {a} := by rw [Ico_succ_right, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ico_succ_singleton Nat.Ico_succ_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Ico_pred_singleton {a : ℕ} (h : 0 < a) : Ico (a - 1) a = {a - 1} := by
rw [← Icc_pred_right _ h, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ico_pred_singleton Nat.Ico_pred_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_succ_singleton : Ioc b (b + 1) = {b + 1} := by rw [← Nat.Icc_succ_left, Icc_self]
#align nat.Ioc_succ_singleton Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton
variable {a b c}
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a (b + 1) = insert b (Ico a b) := by
rw [Ico_succ_right, ← Ico_insert_right h]
#align nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico
theorem Ico_insert_succ_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ico a.succ b) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico_succ_left, ← Ioo_insert_left h]
#align nat.Ico_insert_succ_left Nat.Ico_insert_succ_left
theorem image_sub_const_Ico (h : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).image fun x => x - c) = Ico (a - c) (b - c) := by
ext x
simp_rw [mem_image, mem_Ico]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨x + c, by omega⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
omega
#align nat.image_sub_const_Ico Nat.image_sub_const_Ico
theorem Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (hac : a ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).image fun x => c - x) = Ico (c + 1 - b) (c + 1 - a) := by
ext x
simp_rw [mem_image, mem_Ico]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨c - x, by omega⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
omega
#align nat.Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico Nat.Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Nat.lean | 214 | 217 | theorem Ico_succ_left_eq_erase_Ico : Ico a.succ b = erase (Ico a b) a := by |
ext x
rw [Ico_succ_left, mem_erase, mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, ← and_assoc, ne_comm, @and_comm (a ≠ x),
lt_iff_le_and_ne]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
#align_import data.finset.locally_finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
#align finset.nonempty_Icc Finset.nonempty_Icc
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
#align finset.nonempty_Ico Finset.nonempty_Ico
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
#align finset.nonempty_Ioc Finset.nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
#align finset.nonempty_Ioo Finset.nonempty_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff Finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty Finset.Icc_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty Finset.Ico_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty Finset.Ioc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty Finset.Ioo_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt Finset.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ico_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.left_mem_Icc Finset.left_mem_Icc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and_iff, le_refl]
#align finset.left_mem_Ico Finset.left_mem_Ico
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.right_mem_Icc Finset.right_mem_Icc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.right_mem_Ioc Finset.right_mem_Ioc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
#align finset.left_not_mem_Ioc Finset.left_not_mem_Ioc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
#align finset.left_not_mem_Ioo Finset.left_not_mem_Ioo
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
#align finset.right_not_mem_Ico Finset.right_not_mem_Ico
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
#align finset.right_not_mem_Ioo Finset.right_not_mem_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc Finset.Icc_subset_Icc
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico Finset.Ico_subset_Ico
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_left Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_left
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_left Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_right Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_right Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ioo_left Finset.Ico_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ico_right Finset.Icc_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ico_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ico_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
#align finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left Finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
#align finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right Finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right
variable (a)
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ico_self Finset.Ico_self
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ioc_self Finset.Ioc_self
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ioo_self Finset.Ioo_self
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
#align set.fintype_of_mem_bounds Set.fintypeOfMemBounds
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (c ≤ ·) = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
(Ico a b).filter (b ≤ ·) = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (c ≤ ·) = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
(Icc a b).filter (· < c) = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
#align finset.Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
(Ioc a b).filter (· < c) = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
#align finset.Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : (Iic a).filter (· < c) = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
#align finset.Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a < j ∧ j < b) = Ioo a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo Finset.filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b) = Ioc a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc Finset.filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b) = Ico a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_lt_eq_Ico Finset.filter_le_lt_eq_Ico
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b) = Icc a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_le_eq_Icc Finset.filter_le_le_eq_Icc
end Filter
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ici_self Finset.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Icc_subset_Iic_self Finset.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Iio_self Finset.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Iio_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ico_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Iic_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioi_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
#align bdd_below.finite BddBelow.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
#align set.infinite.not_bdd_below Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : univ.filter (a < ·) = Ioi a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_eq_Ioi Finset.filter_lt_eq_Ioi
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : univ.filter (a ≤ ·) = Ici a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_eq_Ici Finset.filter_le_eq_Ici
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Iio_subset_Iic_self Finset.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
#align bdd_above.finite BddAbove.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
#align set.infinite.not_bdd_above Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : univ.filter (· < a) = Iio a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_gt_eq_Iio Finset.filter_gt_eq_Iio
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : univ.filter (· ≤ a) = Iic a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_ge_eq_Iic Finset.filter_ge_eq_Iic
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
#align finset.disjoint_Ioi_Iio Finset.disjoint_Ioi_Iio
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
#align finset.Icc_self Finset.Icc_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
#align finset.Icc_eq_singleton_iff Finset.Icc_eq_singleton_iff
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
#align finset.Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive Finset.Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_erase_left Finset.Icc_erase_left
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_erase_right Finset.Icc_erase_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Ico_erase_left Finset.Ico_erase_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Ioc_erase_right Finset.Ioc_erase_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_diff_both Finset.Icc_diff_both
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
#align finset.Ico_insert_right Finset.Ico_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
#align finset.Ioc_insert_left Finset.Ioc_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
#align finset.Ioo_insert_left Finset.Ioo_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
#align finset.Ioo_insert_right Finset.Ioo_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ico_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ico_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ioc_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ioc_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Ico_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Ico_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Ioc_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Ioc_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
#align finset.Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive Finset.Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
#align finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ico Finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ico
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
#align finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ioc Finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ioc
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
#align finset.Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo Finset.Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
#align finset.Ico_eq_cons_Ioo Finset.Ico_eq_cons_Ioo
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x ≤ a) = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_le_left
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ico a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
#align finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one Finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one Finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Ico a b).card - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Ioc a b).card - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two
end PartialOrder
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
#align finset.Ici_erase Finset.Ici_erase
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
#align finset.Ioi_insert Finset.Ioi_insert
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
#align finset.not_mem_Ioi_self Finset.not_mem_Ioi_self
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
#align finset.Ici_eq_cons_Ioi Finset.Ici_eq_cons_Ioi
theorem card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one (a : α) : (Ioi a).card = (Ici a).card - 1 := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one Finset.card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_erase [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : (Iic b).erase b = Iio b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm]
#align finset.Iic_erase Finset.Iic_erase
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : insert b (Iio b) = Iic b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm]
#align finset.Iio_insert Finset.Iio_insert
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self {b : α} : b ∉ Iio b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Iio.1 h)
#align finset.not_mem_Iio_self Finset.not_mem_Iio_self
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Iio_insert`. -/
theorem Iic_eq_cons_Iio (b : α) : Iic b = (Iio b).cons b not_mem_Iio_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Iio_insert]
#align finset.Iic_eq_cons_Iio Finset.Iic_eq_cons_Iio
theorem card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one (a : α) : (Iio a).card = (Iic a).card - 1 := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one Finset.card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one
end OrderBot
end BoundedPartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
-- TODO: Why does `id_eq` simplify the LHS here but not the LHS of `Finset.sup_Iic`?
lemma sup'_Iic (a : α) : (Iic a).sup' nonempty_Iic id = a :=
le_antisymm (sup'_le _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup' (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma sup_Iic [OrderBot α] (a : α) : (Iic a).sup id = a :=
le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
lemma inf'_Ici (a : α) : (Ici a).inf' nonempty_Ici id = a :=
ge_antisymm (le_inf' _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1) <| inf'_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma inf_Ici [OrderTop α] (a : α) : (Ici a).inf id = a :=
le_antisymm (inf_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a) <| Finset.le_inf fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1
end SemilatticeInf
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h]
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico b c = Ico a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico Finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) :
Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b c = Ioc a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc h₁ h₂]
#align finset.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc Finset.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico {a b c : α} : Ico a c ⊆ Ico a b ∪ Ico b c := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
theorem Ico_union_Ico' {a b c d : α} (hcb : c ≤ b) (had : a ≤ d) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico' hcb had]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico' Finset.Ico_union_Ico'
theorem Ico_union_Ico {a b c d : α} (h₁ : min a b ≤ max c d) (h₂ : min c d ≤ max a b) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico h₁ h₂]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico Finset.Ico_union_Ico
theorem Ico_inter_Ico {a b c d : α} : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = Ico (max a c) (min b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, ← inf_eq_min, ← sup_eq_max,
Set.Ico_inter_Ico]
#align finset.Ico_inter_Ico Finset.Ico_inter_Ico
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_lt (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a (min b c) := by
cases le_total b c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le h, min_eq_left h]
| inr h => rw [Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right h, min_eq_right h]
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt Finset.Ico_filter_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_le (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico (max a c) b := by
cases le_total a c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_filter_le_of_left_le h, max_eq_right h]
| inr h => rw [Ico_filter_le_of_le_left h, max_eq_left h]
#align finset.Ico_filter_le Finset.Ico_filter_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_filter_lt (a b c : α) : (Ioo a b).filter (· < c) = Ioo a (min b c) := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align finset.Ioo_filter_lt Finset.Ioo_filter_lt
@[simp]
theorem Iio_filter_lt {α} [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] (a b : α) :
(Iio a).filter (· < b) = Iio (min a b) := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align finset.Iio_filter_lt Finset.Iio_filter_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ico_left (a b c : α) : Ico a b \ Ico a c = Ico (max a c) b := by
cases le_total a c with
| inl h =>
ext x
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, max_eq_right h, and_right_comm, not_and, not_lt]
exact and_congr_left' ⟨fun hx => hx.2 hx.1, fun hx => ⟨h.trans hx, fun _ => hx⟩⟩
| inr h => rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, sdiff_empty, max_eq_left h]
#align finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ico_right (a b c : α) : Ico a b \ Ico c b = Ico a (min b c) := by
cases le_total b c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, sdiff_empty, min_eq_left h]
| inr h =>
ext x
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, min_eq_right h, and_assoc, not_and', not_le]
exact and_congr_right' ⟨fun hx => hx.2 hx.1, fun hx => ⟨hx.trans_le h, fun _ => hx⟩⟩
#align finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {s : Set α}
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.exists_gt (hs : s.Infinite) : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
not_bddAbove_iff.1 hs.not_bddAbove
#align set.infinite.exists_gt Set.Infinite.exists_gt
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_exists_gt [Nonempty α] : s.Infinite ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
⟨Set.Infinite.exists_gt, Set.infinite_of_forall_exists_gt⟩
#align set.infinite_iff_exists_gt Set.infinite_iff_exists_gt
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {s : Set α}
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.exists_lt (hs : s.Infinite) : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
not_bddBelow_iff.1 hs.not_bddBelow
#align set.infinite.exists_lt Set.Infinite.exists_lt
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_exists_lt [Nonempty α] : s.Infinite ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨Set.Infinite.exists_lt, Set.infinite_of_forall_exists_lt⟩
#align set.infinite_iff_exists_lt Set.infinite_iff_exists_lt
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [Fintype α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem Ioi_disjUnion_Iio (a : α) :
(Ioi a).disjUnion (Iio a) (disjoint_Ioi_Iio a) = ({a} : Finset α)ᶜ := by
ext
simp [eq_comm]
#align finset.Ioi_disj_union_Iio Finset.Ioi_disjUnion_Iio
end LinearOrder
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
theorem uIcc_toDual (a b : α) : [[toDual a, toDual b]] = [[a, b]].map toDual.toEmbedding :=
Icc_toDual _ _
#align finset.uIcc_to_dual Finset.uIcc_toDual
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 915 | 916 | theorem uIcc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : [[a, b]] = Icc a b := by |
rw [uIcc, inf_eq_left.2 h, sup_eq_right.2 h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.NatAntidiagonal
#align_import data.finset.nat_antidiagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Antidiagonals in ℕ × ℕ as finsets
This file defines the antidiagonals of ℕ × ℕ as finsets: the `n`-th antidiagonal is the finset of
pairs `(i, j)` such that `i + j = n`. This is useful for polynomial multiplication and more
generally for sums going from `0` to `n`.
## Notes
This refines files `Data.List.NatAntidiagonal` and `Data.Multiset.NatAntidiagonal`, providing an
instance enabling `Finset.antidiagonal` on `Nat`.
-/
open Function
namespace Finset
namespace Nat
/-- The antidiagonal of a natural number `n` is
the finset of pairs `(i, j)` such that `i + j = n`. -/
instance instHasAntidiagonal : HasAntidiagonal ℕ where
antidiagonal n := ⟨Multiset.Nat.antidiagonal n, Multiset.Nat.nodup_antidiagonal n⟩
mem_antidiagonal {n} {xy} := by
rw [mem_def, Multiset.Nat.mem_antidiagonal]
lemma antidiagonal_eq_map (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n = (range (n + 1)).map ⟨fun i ↦ (i, n - i), fun _ _ h ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).1⟩ :=
rfl
lemma antidiagonal_eq_map' (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n =
(range (n + 1)).map ⟨fun i ↦ (n - i, i), fun _ _ h ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).2⟩ := by
rw [← map_swap_antidiagonal, antidiagonal_eq_map, map_map]; rfl
lemma antidiagonal_eq_image (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n = (range (n + 1)).image fun i ↦ (i, n - i) := by
simp only [antidiagonal_eq_map, map_eq_image, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
lemma antidiagonal_eq_image' (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n = (range (n + 1)).image fun i ↦ (n - i, i) := by
simp only [antidiagonal_eq_map', map_eq_image, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
/-- The cardinality of the antidiagonal of `n` is `n + 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : (antidiagonal n).card = n + 1 := by simp [antidiagonal]
#align finset.nat.card_antidiagonal Finset.Nat.card_antidiagonal
/-- The antidiagonal of `0` is the list `[(0, 0)]` -/
-- nolint as this is for dsimp
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem antidiagonal_zero : antidiagonal 0 = {(0, 0)} := rfl
#align finset.nat.antidiagonal_zero Finset.Nat.antidiagonal_zero
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NatAntidiagonal.lean | 67 | 75 | theorem antidiagonal_succ (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal (n + 1) =
cons (0, n + 1)
((antidiagonal n).map
(Embedding.prodMap ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩ (Embedding.refl _)))
(by simp) := by |
apply eq_of_veq
rw [cons_val, map_val]
apply Multiset.Nat.antidiagonal_succ
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
#align_import data.set.image from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"001ffdc42920050657fd45bd2b8bfbec8eaaeb29"
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_empty Set.preimage_empty
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
#align set.preimage_congr Set.preimage_congr
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
#align set.preimage_mono Set.preimage_mono
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_univ Set.preimage_univ
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
#align set.subset_preimage_univ Set.subset_preimage_univ
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_inter Set.preimage_inter
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_union Set.preimage_union
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_compl Set.preimage_compl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_diff Set.preimage_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_symm_diff Set.preimage_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_ite Set.preimage_ite
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_set_of_eq Set.preimage_setOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_id_eq Set.preimage_id_eq
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_id Set.preimage_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_id' Set.preimage_id'
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
#align set.preimage_const_of_mem Set.preimage_const_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
#align set.preimage_const_of_not_mem Set.preimage_const_of_not_mem
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
#align set.preimage_const Set.preimage_const
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_comp Set.preimage_comp
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_comp_eq Set.preimage_comp_eq
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction' n with n ih; · simp
rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
#align set.preimage_iterate_eq Set.preimage_iterate_eq
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
#align set.preimage_preimage Set.preimage_preimage
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
#align set.eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff Set.eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage Set.nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
#align set.preimage_singleton_true Set.preimage_singleton_true
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
#align set.preimage_singleton_false Set.preimage_singleton_false
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
#align set.preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl Set.preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
-- Porting note: `Set.image` is already defined in `Init.Set`
#align set.image Set.image
@[deprecated mem_image (since := "2024-03-23")]
theorem mem_image_iff_bex {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {y : β} :
y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ (x : _) (_ : x ∈ s), f x = y :=
bex_def.symm
#align set.mem_image_iff_bex Set.mem_image_iff_bex
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
#align set.image_eta Set.image_eta
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
#align function.injective.mem_set_image Function.Injective.mem_set_image
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
#align set.ball_image_iff Set.forall_mem_image
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
#align set.bex_image_iff Set.exists_mem_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias ball_image_iff := forall_mem_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias bex_image_iff := exists_mem_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias ⟨_, ball_image_of_ball⟩ := forall_mem_image
#align set.ball_image_of_ball Set.ball_image_of_ball
@[deprecated forall_mem_image (since := "2024-02-21")]
theorem mem_image_elim {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {C : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → C (f x)) :
∀ {y : β}, y ∈ f '' s → C y := forall_mem_image.2 h _
#align set.mem_image_elim Set.mem_image_elim
@[deprecated forall_mem_image (since := "2024-02-21")]
theorem mem_image_elim_on {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {C : β → Prop} {y : β} (h_y : y ∈ f '' s)
(h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → C (f x)) : C y := forall_mem_image.2 h _ h_y
#align set.mem_image_elim_on Set.mem_image_elim_on
-- Porting note: used to be `safe`
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
ext x
exact exists_congr fun a ↦ and_congr_right fun ha ↦ by rw [h a ha]
#align set.image_congr Set.image_congr
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
#align set.image_congr' Set.image_congr'
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
#align set.image_comp Set.image_comp
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
#align set.image_image Set.image_image
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
#align set.image_comm Set.image_comm
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
#align function.semiconj.set_image Function.Semiconj.set_image
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
#align function.commute.set_image Function.Commute.set_image
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
#align set.image_subset Set.image_subset
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
#align set.monotone_image Set.monotone_image
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
#align set.image_union Set.image_union
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align set.image_empty Set.image_empty
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
#align set.image_inter_subset Set.image_inter_subset
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
#align set.image_inter_on Set.image_inter_on
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
#align set.image_inter Set.image_inter
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
#align set.image_univ_of_surjective Set.image_univ_of_surjective
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
#align set.image_singleton Set.image_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty.image_const Set.Nonempty.image_const
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
#align set.image_eq_empty Set.image_eq_empty
-- Porting note: `compl` is already defined in `Init.Set`
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
#align set.preimage_compl_eq_image_compl Set.preimage_compl_eq_image_compl
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
#align set.mem_compl_image Set.mem_compl_image
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
#align set.image_id' Set.image_id'
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
#align set.image_id Set.image_id
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
#align set.compl_compl_image Set.compl_compl_image
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
#align set.image_insert_eq Set.image_insert_eq
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
#align set.image_pair Set.image_pair
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
#align set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
#align set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
#align set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
#align set.mem_image_iff_of_inverse Set.mem_image_iff_of_inverse
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
#align set.image_compl_subset Set.image_compl_subset
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
#align set.subset_image_compl Set.subset_image_compl
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
#align set.image_compl_eq Set.image_compl_eq
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
#align set.subset_image_diff Set.subset_image_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
#align set.subset_image_symm_diff Set.subset_image_symmDiff
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
#align set.image_diff Set.image_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
#align set.image_symm_diff Set.image_symmDiff
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
#align set.nonempty.image Set.Nonempty.image
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_image Set.Nonempty.of_image
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
#align set.nonempty_image_iff Set.image_nonempty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-06")] alias nonempty_image_iff := image_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
#align set.nonempty.preimage Set.Nonempty.preimage
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
#align set.image_subset_iff Set.image_subset_iff
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
#align set.image_preimage_subset Set.image_preimage_subset
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
#align set.subset_preimage_image Set.subset_preimage_image
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
#align set.preimage_image_eq Set.preimage_image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
#align set.image_preimage_eq Set.image_preimage_eq
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.intro
fun eq => by rw [← image_preimage_eq s hf, ← image_preimage_eq t hf, eq]
fun eq => eq ▸ rfl
#align set.preimage_eq_preimage Set.preimage_eq_preimage
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.image_inter_preimage Set.image_inter_preimage
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
#align set.image_preimage_inter Set.image_preimage_inter
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
#align set.image_inter_nonempty_iff Set.image_inter_nonempty_iff
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
#align set.image_diff_preimage Set.image_diff_preimage
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
#align set.compl_image Set.compl_image
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
#align set.compl_image_set_of Set.compl_image_set_of
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
#align set.inter_preimage_subset Set.inter_preimage_subset
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
#align set.union_preimage_subset Set.union_preimage_subset
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
#align set.subset_image_union Set.subset_image_union
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.preimage_subset_iff Set.preimage_subset_iff
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
#align set.image_eq_image Set.image_eq_image
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
#align set.image_subset_image_iff Set.image_subset_image_iff
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
#align set.prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image Set.prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
#align set.exists_image_iff Set.exists_image_iff
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
#align set.image_factorization_eq Set.imageFactorization_eq
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.surjective_onto_image Set.surjective_onto_image
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
#align set.image_perm Set.image_perm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
#align set.powerset_insert Set.powerset_insert
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
#align set.forall_range_iff Set.forall_mem_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias forall_range_iff := forall_mem_range
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H i => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
#align set.forall_subtype_range_iff Set.forall_subtype_range_iff
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
#align set.exists_range_iff Set.exists_range_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-10")]
alias exists_range_iff' := exists_range_iff
#align set.exists_range_iff' Set.exists_range_iff'
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
#align set.exists_subtype_range_iff Set.exists_subtype_range_iff
theorem range_iff_surjective : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
#align set.range_iff_surjective Set.range_iff_surjective
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_iff_surjective
#align function.surjective.range_eq Function.Surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
#align set.image_univ Set.image_univ
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
#align set.image_subset_range Set.image_subset_range
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
#align set.mem_range_of_mem_image Set.mem_range_of_mem_image
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
#align nat.mem_range_succ Nat.mem_range_succ
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
#align set.nonempty.preimage' Set.Nonempty.preimage'
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
#align set.range_comp Set.range_comp
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
#align set.range_subset_iff Set.range_subset_iff
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, Function.funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
#align set.range_eq_iff Set.range_eq_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
#align set.range_comp_subset_range Set.range_comp_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
#align set.range_nonempty_iff_nonempty Set.range_nonempty_iff_nonempty
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
#align set.range_nonempty Set.range_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
#align set.range_eq_empty_iff Set.range_eq_empty_iff
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
#align set.range_eq_empty Set.range_eq_empty
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
#align set.image_union_image_compl_eq_range Set.image_union_image_compl_eq_range
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
#align set.insert_image_compl_eq_range Set.insert_image_compl_eq_range
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
#align set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
#align set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
#align set.image_preimage_eq_iff Set.image_preimage_eq_iff
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
#align set.subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq Set.subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
#align set.range_image Set.range_image
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
#align set.exists_subset_range_and_iff Set.exists_subset_range_and_iff
theorem exists_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ (s : _) (_ : s ⊆ range f), p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by simp
#align set.exists_subset_range_iff Set.exists_subset_range_iff
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
#align set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
#align set.preimage_eq_preimage' Set.preimage_eq_preimage'
-- Porting note:
-- @[simp] `simp` can prove this
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align set.preimage_inter_range Set.preimage_inter_range
-- Porting note:
-- @[simp] `simp` can prove this
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
#align set.preimage_range_inter Set.preimage_range_inter
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
#align set.preimage_image_preimage Set.preimage_image_preimage
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_iff_surjective.2 surjective_id
#align set.range_id Set.range_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
#align set.range_id' Set.range_id'
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
#align prod.range_fst Prod.range_fst
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
#align prod.range_snd Prod.range_snd
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
#align set.range_eval Set.range_eval
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
#align set.range_inl Set.range_inl
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
#align set.range_inr Set.range_inr
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
#align set.is_compl_range_inl_range_inr Set.isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → Sum α β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
#align set.range_inl_union_range_inr Set.range_inl_union_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → Sum α β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
#align set.range_inl_inter_range_inr Set.range_inl_inter_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → Sum α β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
#align set.range_inr_union_range_inl Set.range_inr_union_range_inl
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → Sum α β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
#align set.range_inr_inter_range_inl Set.range_inr_inter_range_inl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align set.preimage_inl_image_inr Set.preimage_inl_image_inr
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align set.preimage_inr_image_inl Set.preimage_inr_image_inl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → Sum α β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
#align set.preimage_inl_range_inr Set.preimage_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → Sum α β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
#align set.preimage_inr_range_inl Set.preimage_inr_range_inl
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → Sum α β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → Sum α β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
#align set.compl_range_inl Set.compl_range_inl
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → Sum α β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → Sum α β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
#align set.compl_range_inr Set.compl_range_inr
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (Sum α β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
#align set.image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr Set.image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
(surjective_quot_mk r).range_eq
#align set.range_quot_mk Set.range_quot_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => (surjective_quot_mk _).exists
#align set.range_quot_lift Set.range_quot_lift
-- Porting note: the `Setoid α` instance is not being filled in
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk [sa : Setoid α] : (range (α := Quotient sa) fun x : α => ⟦x⟧) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
#align set.range_quotient_mk Set.range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
#align set.range_quotient_lift Set.range_quotient_lift
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
#align set.range_quotient_mk' Set.range_quotient_mk'
@[simp] lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
#align set.range_quotient_lift_on' Set.range_quotient_lift_on'
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
#align set.can_lift Set.canLift
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
#align set.range_const_subset Set.range_const_subset
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
#align set.range_const Set.range_const
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply Iff.intro
· rintro ⟨a, b, hab⟩
rw [Subtype.map, Subtype.mk.injEq] at hab
use a
trivial
· rintro ⟨a, b, hab⟩
use a
use b
rw [Subtype.map, Subtype.mk.injEq]
exact hab
-- Porting note: `simp_rw` fails here
-- simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map, Subtype.coe_mk,
-- mem_set_of, exists_prop]
#align set.range_subtype_map Set.range_subtype_map
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
#align set.image_swap_eq_preimage_swap Set.image_swap_eq_preimage_swap
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.preimage_singleton_nonempty Set.preimage_singleton_nonempty
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
#align set.preimage_singleton_eq_empty Set.preimage_singleton_eq_empty
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
#align set.range_subset_singleton Set.range_subset_singleton
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
#align set.image_compl_preimage Set.image_compl_preimage
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
#align set.range_factorization_eq Set.rangeFactorization_eq
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
#align set.range_factorization_coe Set.rangeFactorization_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
#align set.coe_comp_range_factorization Set.coe_comp_rangeFactorization
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align set.surjective_onto_range Set.surjective_onto_range
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
#align set.image_eq_range Set.image_eq_range
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : Sum α β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
#align sum.range_eq Sum.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
#align set.sum.elim_range Set.Sum.elim_range
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
#align set.range_ite_subset' Set.range_ite_subset'
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
#align set.range_ite_subset Set.range_ite_subset
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
#align set.preimage_range Set.preimage_range
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
#align set.range_unique Set.range_unique
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
#align set.range_diff_image_subset Set.range_diff_image_subset
theorem range_diff_image {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ :=
(Subset.antisymm (range_diff_image_subset f s)) fun _ ⟨_, hx, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, fun ⟨_, hx', Eq⟩ => hx <| H Eq ▸ hx'⟩
#align set.range_diff_image Set.range_diff_image
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
-- Porting note: `simp [inclusion]` doesn't solve goal
apply Iff.intro
· rw [mem_range]
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [inclusion, Subtype.mk.injEq] at ha
rw [mem_setOf, Subtype.coe_mk, ← ha]
exact Subtype.coe_prop _
· rw [mem_setOf, Subtype.coe_mk, mem_range]
intro hx'
use ⟨x, hx'⟩
trivial
-- simp_rw [inclusion, mem_range, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
-- rw [SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk, exists_prop, exists_eq_right, mem_set_of, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align set.range_inclusion Set.range_inclusion
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
apply Subtype.ext -- Porting note: why doesn't `ext` find this lemma?
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
#align set.left_inverse_range_splitting Set.leftInverse_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
#align set.range_splitting_injective Set.rangeSplitting_injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
#align set.right_inverse_range_splitting Set.rightInverse_rangeSplitting
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
#align set.preimage_range_splitting Set.preimage_rangeSplitting
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
#align set.is_compl_range_some_none Set.isCompl_range_some_none
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
#align set.compl_range_some Set.compl_range_some
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
#align set.range_some_inter_none Set.range_some_inter_none
-- Porting note:
-- @[simp] `simp` can prove this
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
#align set.range_some_union_none Set.range_some_union_none
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
#align set.insert_none_range_some Set.insert_none_range_some
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
#align set.subsingleton.image Set.Subsingleton.image
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton) {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
#align set.subsingleton.preimage Set.Subsingleton.preimage
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
#align set.subsingleton_of_image Set.subsingleton_of_image
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
#align set.subsingleton_of_preimage Set.subsingleton_of_preimage
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
#align set.subsingleton_range Set.subsingleton_range
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial) {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
#align set.nontrivial.preimage Set.Nontrivial.preimage
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
#align set.nontrivial.image Set.Nontrivial.image
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
#align set.nontrivial_of_image Set.nontrivial_of_image
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial {f : α → β} (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
#align set.nontrivial_of_preimage Set.nontrivial_of_preimage
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
#align function.surjective.preimage_injective Function.Surjective.preimage_injective
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
#align function.injective.preimage_image Function.Injective.preimage_image
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) := by
intro s
use f '' s
rw [hf.preimage_image]
#align function.injective.preimage_surjective Function.Injective.preimage_surjective
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
#align function.injective.subsingleton_image_iff Function.Injective.subsingleton_image_iff
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
#align function.surjective.image_preimage Function.Surjective.image_preimage
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
#align function.surjective.image_surjective Function.Surjective.image_surjective
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
#align function.surjective.nonempty_preimage Function.Surjective.nonempty_preimage
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
#align function.injective.image_injective Function.Injective.image_injective
theorem Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set β} (hf : Surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
apply Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
rw [hf.range_eq]
apply subset_univ
#align function.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff Function.Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
theorem Surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext fun y => (@Surjective.exists _ _ _ hf fun x => g x = y).symm
#align function.surjective.range_comp Function.Surjective.range_comp
theorem Injective.mem_range_iff_exists_unique (hf : Injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h, fun _ ha => hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, ExistsUnique.exists⟩
#align function.injective.mem_range_iff_exists_unique Function.Injective.mem_range_iff_exists_unique
theorem Injective.exists_unique_of_mem_range (hf : Injective f) {b : β} (hb : b ∈ range f) :
∃! a, f a = b :=
hf.mem_range_iff_exists_unique.mp hb
#align function.injective.exists_unique_of_mem_range Function.Injective.exists_unique_of_mem_range
theorem Injective.compl_image_eq (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s)ᶜ = f '' sᶜ ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext y
rcases em (y ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp [hf.eq_iff]
· rw [mem_range, not_exists] at hx
simp [hx]
#align function.injective.compl_image_eq Function.Injective.compl_image_eq
theorem LeftInverse.image_image {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
g '' (f '' s) = s := by rw [← image_comp, h.comp_eq_id, image_id]
#align function.left_inverse.image_image Function.LeftInverse.image_image
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,335 | 1,336 | theorem LeftInverse.preimage_preimage {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = s := by | rw [← preimage_comp, h.comp_eq_id, preimage_id]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.