Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align_import category_theory.idempotents.karoubi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"200eda15d8ff5669854ff6bcc10aaf37cb70498f"
/-!
# The Karoubi envelope of a category
In this file, we define the Karoubi envelope `Karoubi C` of a category `C`.
## Main constructions and definitions
- `Karoubi C` is the Karoubi envelope of a category `C`: it is an idempotent
complete category. It is also preadditive when `C` is preadditive.
- `toKaroubi C : C ⥤ Karoubi C` is a fully faithful functor, which is an equivalence
(`toKaroubiIsEquivalence`) when `C` is idempotent complete.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Preadditive CategoryTheory.Limits BigOperators
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
namespace Idempotents
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- In a preadditive category `C`, when an object `X` decomposes as `X ≅ P ⨿ Q`, one may
consider `P` as a direct factor of `X` and up to unique isomorphism, it is determined by the
obvious idempotent `X ⟶ P ⟶ X` which is the projection onto `P` with kernel `Q`. More generally,
one may define a formal direct factor of an object `X : C` : it consists of an idempotent
`p : X ⟶ X` which is thought as the "formal image" of `p`. The type `Karoubi C` shall be the
type of the objects of the karoubi envelope of `C`. It makes sense for any category `C`. -/
structure Karoubi where
/-- an object of the underlying category -/
X : C
/-- an endomorphism of the object -/
p : X ⟶ X
/-- the condition that the given endomorphism is an idempotent -/
idem : p ≫ p = p := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi
namespace Karoubi
variable {C}
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] idem
@[ext]
theorem ext {P Q : Karoubi C} (h_X : P.X = Q.X) (h_p : P.p ≫ eqToHom h_X = eqToHom h_X ≫ Q.p) :
P = Q := by
cases P
cases Q
dsimp at h_X h_p
subst h_X
simpa only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and, eqToHom_refl, comp_id, id_comp] using h_p
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.ext CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.ext
/-- A morphism `P ⟶ Q` in the category `Karoubi C` is a morphism in the underlying category
`C` which satisfies a relation, which in the preadditive case, expresses that it induces a
map between the corresponding "formal direct factors" and that it vanishes on the complement
formal direct factor. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (P Q : Karoubi C) where
/-- a morphism between the underlying objects -/
f : P.X ⟶ Q.X
/-- compatibility of the given morphism with the given idempotents -/
comm : f = P.p ≫ f ≫ Q.p := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.hom CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.Hom
instance [Preadditive C] (P Q : Karoubi C) : Inhabited (Hom P Q) :=
⟨⟨0, by rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]⟩⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem p_comp {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : P.p ≫ f.f = f.f := by rw [f.comm, ← assoc, P.idem]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.p_comp CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.p_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_p {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : f.f ≫ Q.p = f.f := by
rw [f.comm, assoc, assoc, Q.idem]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.comp_p CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.comp_p
@[reassoc]
theorem p_comm {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : P.p ≫ f.f = f.f ≫ Q.p := by rw [p_comp, comp_p]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.p_comm CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.p_comm
theorem comp_proof {P Q R : Karoubi C} (g : Hom Q R) (f : Hom P Q) :
f.f ≫ g.f = P.p ≫ (f.f ≫ g.f) ≫ R.p := by rw [assoc, comp_p, ← assoc, p_comp]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.comp_proof CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.comp_proof
/-- The category structure on the karoubi envelope of a category. -/
instance : Category (Karoubi C) where
Hom := Karoubi.Hom
id P := ⟨P.p, by repeat' rw [P.idem]⟩
comp f g := ⟨f.f ≫ g.f, Karoubi.comp_proof g f⟩
@[simp]
theorem hom_ext_iff {P Q : Karoubi C} {f g : P ⟶ Q} : f = g ↔ f.f = g.f := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [h]
· apply Hom.ext
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.hom_ext_iff
-- Porting note: added because `Hom.ext` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {P Q : Karoubi C} (f g : P ⟶ Q) (h : f.f = g.f) : f = g := by
simpa [hom_ext_iff] using h
@[simp]
theorem comp_f {P Q R : Karoubi C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) : (f ≫ g).f = f.f ≫ g.f := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.comp_f CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.comp_f
@[simp]
theorem id_eq {P : Karoubi C} : 𝟙 P = ⟨P.p, by repeat' rw [P.idem]⟩ := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.id_eq CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.id_eq
/-- It is possible to coerce an object of `C` into an object of `Karoubi C`.
See also the functor `toKaroubi`. -/
instance coe : CoeTC C (Karoubi C) :=
⟨fun X => ⟨X, 𝟙 X, by rw [comp_id]⟩⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.coe CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.coe
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complains
theorem coe_X (X : C) : (X : Karoubi C).X = X := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.coe_X CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.coe_X
@[simp]
theorem coe_p (X : C) : (X : Karoubi C).p = 𝟙 X := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.coe_p CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.coe_p
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {P Q : Karoubi C} (h : P = Q) :
Karoubi.Hom.f (eqToHom h) = P.p ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg Karoubi.X h) := by
subst h
simp only [eqToHom_refl, Karoubi.id_eq, comp_id]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.eq_to_hom_f CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.eqToHom_f
end Karoubi
/-- The obvious fully faithful functor `toKaroubi` sends an object `X : C` to the obvious
formal direct factor of `X` given by `𝟙 X`. -/
@[simps]
def toKaroubi : C ⥤ Karoubi C where
obj X := ⟨X, 𝟙 X, by rw [comp_id]⟩
map f := ⟨f, by simp only [comp_id, id_comp]⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubi
instance : (toKaroubi C).Full where map_surjective f := ⟨f.f, rfl⟩
instance : (toKaroubi C).Faithful where
map_injective := fun h => congr_arg Karoubi.Hom.f h
variable {C}
@[simps add]
instance instAdd [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Add (P ⟶ Q) where
add f g := ⟨f.f + g.f, by rw [add_comp, comp_add, ← f.comm, ← g.comm]⟩
@[simps neg]
instance instNeg [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Neg (P ⟶ Q) where
neg f := ⟨-f.f, by simpa only [neg_comp, comp_neg, neg_inj] using f.comm⟩
@[simps zero]
instance instZero [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Zero (P ⟶ Q) where
zero := ⟨0, by simp only [comp_zero, zero_comp]⟩
instance instAddCommGroupHom [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : AddCommGroup (P ⟶ Q) where
zero_add f := by
ext
apply zero_add
add_zero f := by
ext
apply add_zero
add_assoc f g h' := by
ext
apply add_assoc
add_comm f g := by
ext
apply add_comm
add_left_neg f := by
ext
apply add_left_neg
zsmul := zsmulRec
nsmul := nsmulRec
namespace Karoubi
theorem hom_eq_zero_iff [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} {f : P ⟶ Q} : f = 0 ↔ f.f = 0 :=
hom_ext_iff
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.hom_eq_zero_iff CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.hom_eq_zero_iff
/-- The map sending `f : P ⟶ Q` to `f.f : P.X ⟶ Q.X` is additive. -/
@[simps]
def inclusionHom [Preadditive C] (P Q : Karoubi C) : AddMonoidHom (P ⟶ Q) (P.X ⟶ Q.X) where
toFun f := f.f
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.inclusion_hom CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.inclusionHom
@[simp]
theorem sum_hom [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → (P ⟶ Q)) :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).f = ∑ x ∈ s, (f x).f :=
map_sum (inclusionHom P Q) f s
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.sum_hom CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.sum_hom
end Karoubi
/-- The category `Karoubi C` is preadditive if `C` is. -/
instance [Preadditive C] : Preadditive (Karoubi C) where
homGroup P Q := by infer_instance
instance [Preadditive C] : Functor.Additive (toKaroubi C) where
open Karoubi
variable (C)
instance : IsIdempotentComplete (Karoubi C) := by
refine ⟨?_⟩
intro P p hp
simp only [hom_ext_iff, comp_f] at hp
use ⟨P.X, p.f, hp⟩
use ⟨p.f, by rw [comp_p p, hp]⟩
use ⟨p.f, by rw [hp, p_comp p]⟩
simp [hp]
instance [IsIdempotentComplete C] : (toKaroubi C).EssSurj :=
⟨fun P => by
rcases IsIdempotentComplete.idempotents_split P.X P.p P.idem with ⟨Y, i, e, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
use Y
exact
Nonempty.intro
{ hom := ⟨i, by erw [id_comp, ← h₂, ← assoc, h₁, id_comp]⟩
inv := ⟨e, by erw [comp_id, ← h₂, assoc, h₁, comp_id]⟩ }⟩
/-- If `C` is idempotent complete, the functor `toKaroubi : C ⥤ Karoubi C` is an equivalence. -/
instance toKaroubi_isEquivalence [IsIdempotentComplete C] : (toKaroubi C).IsEquivalence where
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi_is_equivalence CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubi_isEquivalence
/-- The equivalence `C ≅ Karoubi C` when `C` is idempotent complete. -/
def toKaroubiEquivalence [IsIdempotentComplete C] : C ≌ Karoubi C :=
(toKaroubi C).asEquivalence
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi_equivalence CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubiEquivalence
instance toKaroubiEquivalence_functor_additive [Preadditive C] [IsIdempotentComplete C] :
(toKaroubiEquivalence C).functor.Additive :=
(inferInstance : (toKaroubi C).Additive)
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi_equivalence_functor_additive CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubiEquivalence_functor_additive
namespace Karoubi
variable {C}
/-- The split mono which appears in the factorisation `decompId P`. -/
@[simps]
def decompId_i (P : Karoubi C) : P ⟶ P.X :=
⟨P.p, by erw [coe_p, comp_id, P.idem]⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.decomp_id_i CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.decompId_i
/-- The split epi which appears in the factorisation `decompId P`. -/
@[simps]
def decompId_p (P : Karoubi C) : (P.X : Karoubi C) ⟶ P :=
⟨P.p, by erw [coe_p, id_comp, P.idem]⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.decomp_id_p CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.decompId_p
/-- The formal direct factor of `P.X` given by the idempotent `P.p` in the category `C`
is actually a direct factor in the category `Karoubi C`. -/
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Idempotents/Karoubi.lean | 281 | 283 | theorem decompId (P : Karoubi C) : 𝟙 P = decompId_i P ≫ decompId_p P := by |
ext
simp only [comp_f, id_eq, P.idem, decompId_i, decompId_p]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import data.finset.n_ary from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"eba7871095e834365616b5e43c8c7bb0b37058d0"
/-!
# N-ary images of finsets
This file defines `Finset.image₂`, the binary image of finsets. This is the finset version of
`Set.image2`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Order.Filter.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
We do not define `Finset.image₃` as its only purpose would be to prove properties of `Finset.image₂`
and `Set.image2` already fulfills this task.
-/
open Function Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] [DecidableEq γ'] [DecidableEq δ]
[DecidableEq δ'] [DecidableEq ε] [DecidableEq ε'] {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
{s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {u u' : Finset γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Finset α → Finset β → Finset γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset γ :=
(s ×ˢ t).image <| uncurry f
#align finset.image₂ Finset.image₂
@[simp]
theorem mem_image₂ : c ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, f a b = c := by
simp [image₂, and_assoc]
#align finset.mem_image₂ Finset.mem_image₂
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t : Set γ) = Set.image2 f s t :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image₂
#align finset.coe_image₂ Finset.coe_image₂
theorem card_image₂_le (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t).card ≤ s.card * t.card :=
card_image_le.trans_eq <| card_product _ _
#align finset.card_image₂_le Finset.card_image₂_le
theorem card_image₂_iff :
(image₂ f s t).card = s.card * t.card ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).InjOn fun x => f x.1 x.2 := by
rw [← card_product, ← coe_product]
exact card_image_iff
#align finset.card_image₂_iff Finset.card_image₂_iff
theorem card_image₂ (hf : Injective2 f) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t).card = s.card * t.card :=
(card_image_of_injective _ hf.uncurry).trans <| card_product _ _
#align finset.card_image₂ Finset.card_image₂
theorem mem_image₂_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t :=
mem_image₂.2 ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
#align finset.mem_image₂_of_mem Finset.mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem mem_image₂_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, mem_image2_iff hf, mem_coe, mem_coe]
#align finset.mem_image₂_iff Finset.mem_image₂_iff
theorem image₂_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image₂, coe_image₂]
exact image2_subset hs ht
#align finset.image₂_subset Finset.image₂_subset
theorem image₂_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s t' :=
image₂_subset Subset.rfl ht
#align finset.image₂_subset_left Finset.image₂_subset_left
theorem image₂_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t :=
image₂_subset hs Subset.rfl
#align finset.image₂_subset_right Finset.image₂_subset_right
theorem image_subset_image₂_left (hb : b ∈ t) : s.image (fun a => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => mem_image₂_of_mem ha hb
#align finset.image_subset_image₂_left Finset.image_subset_image₂_left
theorem image_subset_image₂_right (ha : a ∈ s) : t.image (fun b => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_image₂_of_mem ha
#align finset.image_subset_image₂_right Finset.image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_image₂_iff {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, forall_image2_iff]
#align finset.forall_image₂_iff Finset.forall_image₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem image₂_subset_iff : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_image₂_iff
#align finset.image₂_subset_iff Finset.image₂_subset_iff
theorem image₂_subset_iff_left : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (t.image fun b => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff]
#align finset.image₂_subset_iff_left Finset.image₂_subset_iff_left
theorem image₂_subset_iff_right : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (s.image fun a => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, @forall₂_swap α]
#align finset.image₂_subset_iff_right Finset.image₂_subset_iff_right
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem image₂_nonempty_iff : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_image₂]
exact image2_nonempty_iff
#align finset.image₂_nonempty_iff Finset.image₂_nonempty_iff
theorem Nonempty.image₂ (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
#align finset.nonempty.image₂ Finset.Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_left (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
#align finset.nonempty.of_image₂_left Finset.Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_right (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
#align finset.nonempty.of_image₂_right Finset.Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_left : image₂ f ∅ t = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
#align finset.image₂_empty_left Finset.image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_right : image₂ f s ∅ = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
#align finset.image₂_empty_right Finset.image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_eq_empty_iff : image₂ f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image₂_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
#align finset.image₂_eq_empty_iff Finset.image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_left : image₂ f {a} t = t.image fun b => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align finset.image₂_singleton_left Finset.image₂_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_right : image₂ f s {b} = s.image fun a => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align finset.image₂_singleton_right Finset.image₂_singleton_right
theorem image₂_singleton_left' : image₂ f {a} t = t.image (f a) :=
image₂_singleton_left
#align finset.image₂_singleton_left' Finset.image₂_singleton_left'
theorem image₂_singleton : image₂ f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
#align finset.image₂_singleton Finset.image₂_singleton
theorem image₂_union_left [DecidableEq α] : image₂ f (s ∪ s') t = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_left
#align finset.image₂_union_left Finset.image₂_union_left
theorem image₂_union_right [DecidableEq β] : image₂ f s (t ∪ t') = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_right
#align finset.image₂_union_right Finset.image₂_union_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (insert a s) t = (t.image fun b => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_left
#align finset.image₂_insert_left Finset.image₂_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (insert b t) = (s.image fun a => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_right
#align finset.image₂_insert_right Finset.image₂_insert_right
theorem image₂_inter_left [DecidableEq α] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_left hf
#align finset.image₂_inter_left Finset.image₂_inter_left
theorem image₂_inter_right [DecidableEq β] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_right hf
#align finset.image₂_inter_right Finset.image₂_inter_right
theorem image₂_inter_subset_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_left
#align finset.image₂_inter_subset_left Finset.image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem image₂_inter_subset_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_right
#align finset.image₂_inter_subset_right Finset.image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem image₂_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_congr h
#align finset.image₂_congr Finset.image₂_congr
/-- A common special case of `image₂_congr` -/
theorem image₂_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
image₂_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
#align finset.image₂_congr' Finset.image₂_congr'
variable (s t)
theorem card_image₂_singleton_left (hf : Injective (f a)) : (image₂ f {a} t).card = t.card := by
rw [image₂_singleton_left, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
#align finset.card_image₂_singleton_left Finset.card_image₂_singleton_left
theorem card_image₂_singleton_right (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
(image₂ f s {b}).card = s.card := by rw [image₂_singleton_right, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
#align finset.card_image₂_singleton_right Finset.card_image₂_singleton_right
theorem image₂_singleton_inter [DecidableEq β] (t₁ t₂ : Finset β) (hf : Injective (f a)) :
image₂ f {a} (t₁ ∩ t₂) = image₂ f {a} t₁ ∩ image₂ f {a} t₂ := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_left, image_inter _ _ hf]
#align finset.image₂_singleton_inter Finset.image₂_singleton_inter
theorem image₂_inter_singleton [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
image₂ f (s₁ ∩ s₂) {b} = image₂ f s₁ {b} ∩ image₂ f s₂ {b} := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_right, image_inter _ _ hf]
#align finset.image₂_inter_singleton Finset.image₂_inter_singleton
theorem card_le_card_image₂_left {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (hf : ∀ a, Injective (f a)) :
t.card ≤ (image₂ f s t).card := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_left _ (hf a)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_right <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)
#align finset.card_le_card_image₂_left Finset.card_le_card_image₂_left
theorem card_le_card_image₂_right {t : Finset β} (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hf : ∀ b, Injective fun a => f a b) : s.card ≤ (image₂ f s t).card := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_right _ (hf b)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_left <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hb)
#align finset.card_le_card_image₂_right Finset.card_le_card_image₂_right
variable {s t}
theorem biUnion_image_left : (s.biUnion fun a => t.image <| f a) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_left _
#align finset.bUnion_image_left Finset.biUnion_image_left
theorem biUnion_image_right : (t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => f a b) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_right _
#align finset.bUnion_image_right Finset.biUnion_image_right
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
A collection of lemmas to transfer associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of operations
to the associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of `Finset.image₂` of those operations.
The proof pattern is `image₂_lemma operation_lemma`. For example, `image₂_comm mul_comm` proves that
`image₂ (*) f g = image₂ (*) g f` in a `CommSemigroup`.
-/
theorem image_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ (fun a b => g (f a b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2 _ _
#align finset.image_image₂ Finset.image_image₂
theorem image₂_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = image₂ (fun a b => f (g a) b) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_left _ _
#align finset.image₂_image_left Finset.image₂_image_left
theorem image₂_image_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = image₂ (fun a b => f a (g b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_right _ _
#align finset.image₂_image_right Finset.image₂_image_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NAry.lean | 313 | 314 | theorem image₂_mk_eq_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := by | ext; simp [Prod.ext_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.OfArity
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import set_theory.zfc.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0b3759a8ef0bd8239ecdaa5e1089add5feebe1a"
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ Choice) using Lean's underlying type theory.
We do this in four main steps:
* Define pre-sets inductively.
* Define extensional equivalence on pre-sets and give it a `setoid` instance.
* Define ZFC sets by quotienting pre-sets by extensional equivalence.
* Define classes as sets of ZFC sets.
Then the rest is usual set theory.
## The model
* `PSet`: Pre-set. A pre-set is inductively defined by its indexing type and its members, which are
themselves pre-sets.
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `Class`: Class. Defined as `Set ZFSet`.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
## Other definitions
* `PSet.Type`: Underlying type of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Func`: Underlying family of pre-sets of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of pre-sets. Defined inductively.
* `PSet.omega`, `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `PSet`, as a `Set`.
* `PSet.Arity.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions. Extension of
`PSet.Equiv`.
* `PSet.Resp`: Collection of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions that respect extensional equivalence.
* `PSet.eval`: Turns a `PSet`-valued function that respect extensional equivalence into a
`ZFSet`-valued function.
* `Classical.allDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
* `Class.iota`: Definite description operator.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
## TODO
Prove `ZFSet.mapDefinableAux` computably.
-/
-- Porting note: Lean 3 uses `Set` for `ZFSet`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v
open Function (OfArity)
/-- The type of pre-sets in universe `u`. A pre-set
is a family of pre-sets indexed by a type in `Type u`.
The ZFC universe is defined as a quotient of this
to ensure extensionality. -/
inductive PSet : Type (u + 1)
| mk (α : Type u) (A : α → PSet) : PSet
#align pSet PSet
namespace PSet
/-- The underlying type of a pre-set -/
def «Type» : PSet → Type u
| ⟨α, _⟩ => α
#align pSet.type PSet.Type
/-- The underlying pre-set family of a pre-set -/
def Func : ∀ x : PSet, x.Type → PSet
| ⟨_, A⟩ => A
#align pSet.func PSet.Func
@[simp]
theorem mk_type (α A) : «Type» ⟨α, A⟩ = α :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_type PSet.mk_type
@[simp]
theorem mk_func (α A) : Func ⟨α, A⟩ = A :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_func PSet.mk_func
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ x : PSet, mk x.Type x.Func = x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.eta PSet.eta
/-- Two pre-sets are extensionally equivalent if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family and vice-versa. -/
def Equiv : PSet → PSet → Prop
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => (∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) ∧ (∀ b, ∃ a, Equiv (A a) (B b))
#align pSet.equiv PSet.Equiv
theorem equiv_iff :
∀ {x y : PSet},
Equiv x y ↔ (∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)) ∧ ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ => Iff.rfl
#align pSet.equiv_iff PSet.equiv_iff
theorem Equiv.exists_left {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).1
#align pSet.equiv.exists_left PSet.Equiv.exists_left
theorem Equiv.exists_right {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).2
#align pSet.equiv.exists_right PSet.Equiv.exists_right
@[refl]
protected theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ x, Equiv x x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩, fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.refl PSet.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Equiv.rfl {x} : Equiv x x :=
Equiv.refl x
#align pSet.equiv.rfl PSet.Equiv.rfl
protected theorem Equiv.euc : ∀ {x y z}, Equiv x y → Equiv z y → Equiv x z
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨γβ, βγ⟩ =>
⟨ fun a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.euc ab bc⟩,
fun c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.euc ba cb⟩ ⟩
#align pSet.equiv.euc PSet.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y} : Equiv x y → Equiv y x :=
(Equiv.refl y).euc
#align pSet.equiv.symm PSet.Equiv.symm
protected theorem Equiv.comm {x y} : Equiv x y ↔ Equiv y x :=
⟨Equiv.symm, Equiv.symm⟩
#align pSet.equiv.comm PSet.Equiv.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z} (h1 : Equiv x y) (h2 : Equiv y z) : Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.equiv.trans PSet.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_of_isEmpty (x y : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] [IsEmpty y.Type] : Equiv x y :=
equiv_iff.2 <| by simp
#align pSet.equiv_of_is_empty PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty
instance setoid : Setoid PSet :=
⟨PSet.Equiv, Equiv.refl, Equiv.symm, Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.setoid PSet.setoid
/-- A pre-set is a subset of another pre-set if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family. -/
protected def Subset (x y : PSet) : Prop :=
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (x.Func a) (y.Func b)
#align pSet.subset PSet.Subset
instance : HasSubset PSet :=
⟨PSet.Subset⟩
instance : IsRefl PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
instance : IsTrans PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun x y z hxy hyz a => by
cases' hxy a with b hb
cases' hyz b with c hc
exact ⟨c, hb.trans hc⟩⟩
theorem Equiv.ext : ∀ x y : PSet, Equiv x y ↔ x ⊆ y ∧ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩,
fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.ext PSet.Equiv.ext
theorem Subset.congr_left : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (x ⊆ z ↔ y ⊆ z)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun αγ b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
let ⟨c, ac⟩ := αγ a
⟨c, (Equiv.symm ba).trans ac⟩,
fun βγ a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.trans ab bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_left PSet.Subset.congr_left
theorem Subset.congr_right : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (z ⊆ x ↔ z ⊆ y)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun γα c =>
let ⟨a, ca⟩ := γα c
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ca.trans ab⟩,
fun γβ c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨a, cb.trans (Equiv.symm ab)⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_right PSet.Subset.congr_right
/-- `x ∈ y` as pre-sets if `x` is extensionally equivalent to a member of the family `y`. -/
protected def Mem (x y : PSet.{u}) : Prop :=
∃ b, Equiv x (y.Func b)
#align pSet.mem PSet.Mem
instance : Membership PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.Mem⟩
theorem Mem.mk {α : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (a : α) : A a ∈ mk α A :=
⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩
#align pSet.mem.mk PSet.Mem.mk
theorem func_mem (x : PSet) (i : x.Type) : x.Func i ∈ x := by
cases x
apply Mem.mk
#align pSet.func_mem PSet.func_mem
theorem Mem.ext : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, (∀ w : PSet.{u}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) → Equiv x y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩, h =>
⟨fun a => (h (A a)).1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (h (B b)).2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, ha.symm⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.ext PSet.Mem.ext
theorem Mem.congr_right : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ha.trans hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨a, hb.euc ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_right PSet.Mem.congr_right
theorem equiv_iff_mem {x y : PSet.{u}} : Equiv x y ↔ ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y :=
⟨Mem.congr_right,
match x, y with
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => fun h =>
⟨fun a => h.1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := h.2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, h.symm⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv_iff_mem PSet.equiv_iff_mem
theorem Mem.congr_left : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, x ∈ w ↔ y ∈ w
| _, _, h, ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.symm.trans ha⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.trans ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_left PSet.Mem.congr_left
private theorem mem_wf_aux : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → Acc (· ∈ ·) y
| ⟨α, A⟩, ⟨β, B⟩, H =>
⟨_, by
rintro ⟨γ, C⟩ ⟨b, hc⟩
cases' H.exists_right b with a ha
have H := ha.trans hc.symm
rw [mk_func] at H
exact mem_wf_aux H⟩
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨fun x => mem_wf_aux <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.mem_wf PSet.mem_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation PSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
instance : IsIrrefl PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : PSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align pSet.mem_asymm PSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : PSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align pSet.mem_irrefl PSet.mem_irrefl
/-- Convert a pre-set to a `Set` of pre-sets. -/
def toSet (u : PSet.{u}) : Set PSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align pSet.to_set PSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : PSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.mem_to_set PSet.mem_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : PSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align pSet.nonempty PSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : PSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_def PSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : PSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_of_mem PSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : PSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_to_set_iff PSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
theorem nonempty_type_iff_nonempty {x : PSet} : Nonempty x.Type ↔ PSet.Nonempty x :=
⟨fun ⟨i⟩ => ⟨_, func_mem _ i⟩, fun ⟨_, j, _⟩ => ⟨j⟩⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty PSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_type (x : PSet) [h : Nonempty x.Type] : PSet.Nonempty x :=
nonempty_type_iff_nonempty.1 h
#align pSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type PSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type
/-- Two pre-sets are equivalent iff they have the same members. -/
theorem Equiv.eq {x y : PSet} : Equiv x y ↔ toSet x = toSet y :=
equiv_iff_mem.trans Set.ext_iff.symm
#align pSet.equiv.eq PSet.Equiv.eq
instance : Coe PSet (Set PSet) :=
⟨toSet⟩
/-- The empty pre-set -/
protected def empty : PSet :=
⟨_, PEmpty.elim⟩
#align pSet.empty PSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection PSet :=
⟨PSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited PSet :=
⟨∅⟩
instance : IsEmpty («Type» ∅) :=
⟨PEmpty.elim⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x : PSet.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : PSet.{u}) :=
IsEmpty.exists_iff.1
#align pSet.not_mem_empty PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align pSet.to_set_empty PSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : PSet.{u}) : (∅ : PSet) ⊆ x := fun x => x.elim
#align pSet.empty_subset PSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬PSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [PSet.Nonempty]
#align pSet.not_nonempty_empty PSet.not_nonempty_empty
protected theorem equiv_empty (x : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] : Equiv x ∅ :=
PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty x _
#align pSet.equiv_empty PSet.equiv_empty
/-- Insert an element into a pre-set -/
protected def insert (x y : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Option y.Type, fun o => Option.casesOn o x y.Func⟩
#align pSet.insert PSet.insert
instance : Insert PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.insert⟩
instance : Singleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun s => insert s ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
instance (x y : PSet) : Inhabited (insert x y).Type :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited <| Option y.Type)
/-- The n-th von Neumann ordinal -/
def ofNat : ℕ → PSet
| 0 => ∅
| n + 1 => insert (ofNat n) (ofNat n)
#align pSet.of_nat PSet.ofNat
/-- The von Neumann ordinal ω -/
def omega : PSet :=
⟨ULift ℕ, fun n => ofNat n.down⟩
#align pSet.omega PSet.omega
/-- The pre-set separation operation `{x ∈ a | p x}` -/
protected def sep (p : PSet → Prop) (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨{ a // p (x.Func a) }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩
#align pSet.sep PSet.sep
instance : Sep PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.sep⟩
/-- The pre-set powerset operator -/
def powerset (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Set x.Type, fun p => ⟨{ a // p a }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩⟩
#align pSet.powerset PSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset : ∀ {x y : PSet}, y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => (Subset.congr_left e).2 fun ⟨a, _⟩ => ⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩, fun βα =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, Equiv (B b) (A a) }, fun b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, ba⟩, ba⟩,
fun ⟨_, b, ba⟩ => ⟨b, ba⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_powerset PSet.mem_powerset
/-- The pre-set union operator -/
def sUnion (a : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Σx, (a.Func x).Type, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (a.Func x).Func y⟩
#align pSet.sUnion PSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z
| ⟨α, A⟩, y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, c⟩, (e : Equiv y ((A a).Func c))⟩ =>
have : Func (A a) c ∈ mk (A a).Type (A a).Func := Mem.mk (A a).Func c
⟨_, Mem.mk _ _, (Mem.congr_left e).2 (by rwa [eta] at this)⟩,
fun ⟨⟨β, B⟩, ⟨a, (e : Equiv (mk β B) (A a))⟩, ⟨b, yb⟩⟩ => by
rw [← eta (A a)] at e
exact
let ⟨βt, _⟩ := e
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βt b
⟨⟨a, c⟩, yb.trans bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_sUnion PSet.mem_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : PSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align pSet.to_set_sUnion PSet.toSet_sUnion
/-- The image of a function from pre-sets to pre-sets. -/
def image (f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (x : PSet.{u}) : PSet :=
⟨x.Type, f ∘ x.Func⟩
#align pSet.image PSet.image
-- Porting note: H arguments made explicit.
theorem mem_image {f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}} (H : ∀ x y, Equiv x y → Equiv (f x) (f y)) :
∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, Equiv y (f z)
| ⟨_, A⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨A a, Mem.mk A a, ya⟩, fun ⟨_, ⟨a, za⟩, yz⟩ => ⟨a, yz.trans <| H _ _ za⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_image PSet.mem_image
/-- Universe lift operation -/
protected def Lift : PSet.{u} → PSet.{max u v}
| ⟨α, A⟩ => ⟨ULift.{v, u} α, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift (A x)⟩
#align pSet.lift PSet.Lift
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- Embedding of one universe in another -/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
def embed : PSet.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨ULift.{v, u + 1} PSet, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x⟩
#align pSet.embed PSet.embed
theorem lift_mem_embed : ∀ x : PSet.{u}, PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x ∈ embed.{u, v} := fun x =>
⟨⟨x⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align pSet.lift_mem_embed PSet.lift_mem_embed
/-- Function equivalence is defined so that `f ~ g` iff `∀ x y, x ~ y → f x ~ g y`. This extends to
equivalence of `n`-ary functions. -/
def Arity.Equiv : ∀ {n}, OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → Prop
| 0, a, b => PSet.Equiv a b
| _ + 1, a, b => ∀ x y : PSet, PSet.Equiv x y → Arity.Equiv (a x) (b y)
#align pSet.arity.equiv PSet.Arity.Equiv
theorem Arity.equiv_const {a : PSet.{u}} :
∀ n, Arity.Equiv (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n) (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n)
| 0 => Equiv.rfl
| _ + 1 => fun _ _ _ => Arity.equiv_const _
#align pSet.arity.equiv_const PSet.Arity.equiv_const
/-- `resp n` is the collection of n-ary functions on `PSet` that respect
equivalence, i.e. when the inputs are equivalent the output is as well. -/
def Resp (n) :=
{ x : OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n // Arity.Equiv x x }
#align pSet.resp PSet.Resp
instance Resp.inhabited {n} : Inhabited (Resp n) :=
⟨⟨OfArity.const _ default _, Arity.equiv_const _⟩⟩
#align pSet.resp.inhabited PSet.Resp.inhabited
/-- The `n`-ary image of a `(n + 1)`-ary function respecting equivalence as a function respecting
equivalence. -/
def Resp.f {n} (f : Resp (n + 1)) (x : PSet) : Resp n :=
⟨f.1 x, f.2 _ _ <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.resp.f PSet.Resp.f
/-- Function equivalence for functions respecting equivalence. See `PSet.Arity.Equiv`. -/
def Resp.Equiv {n} (a b : Resp n) : Prop :=
Arity.Equiv a.1 b.1
#align pSet.resp.equiv PSet.Resp.Equiv
@[refl]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.refl {n} (a : Resp n) : Resp.Equiv a a :=
a.2
#align pSet.resp.equiv.refl PSet.Resp.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.euc :
∀ {n} {a b c : Resp n}, Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv c b → Resp.Equiv a c
| 0, _, _, _, hab, hcb => PSet.Equiv.euc hab hcb
| n + 1, a, b, c, hab, hcb => fun x y h =>
@Resp.Equiv.euc n (a.f x) (b.f y) (c.f y) (hab _ _ h) (hcb _ _ <| PSet.Equiv.refl y)
#align pSet.resp.equiv.euc PSet.Resp.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.symm {n} {a b : Resp n} : Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv b a :=
(Resp.Equiv.refl b).euc
#align pSet.resp.equiv.symm PSet.Resp.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.trans {n} {x y z : Resp n} (h1 : Resp.Equiv x y)
(h2 : Resp.Equiv y z) : Resp.Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.resp.equiv.trans PSet.Resp.Equiv.trans
instance Resp.setoid {n} : Setoid (Resp n) :=
⟨Resp.Equiv, Resp.Equiv.refl, Resp.Equiv.symm, Resp.Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.resp.setoid PSet.Resp.setoid
end PSet
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
#align Set ZFSet
namespace PSet
namespace Resp
/-- Helper function for `PSet.eval`. -/
def evalAux :
∀ {n},
{ f : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n // ∀ a b : Resp n, Resp.Equiv a b → f a = f b }
| 0 => ⟨fun a => ⟦a.1⟧, fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound h⟩
| n + 1 =>
let F : Resp (n + 1) → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1) := fun a =>
@Quotient.lift _ _ PSet.setoid (fun x => evalAux.1 (a.f x)) fun _ _ h =>
evalAux.2 _ _ (a.2 _ _ h)
⟨F, fun b c h =>
funext <|
(@Quotient.ind _ _ fun q => F b q = F c q) fun z =>
evalAux.2 (Resp.f b z) (Resp.f c z) (h _ _ (PSet.Equiv.refl z))⟩
#align pSet.resp.eval_aux PSet.Resp.evalAux
/-- An equivalence-respecting function yields an n-ary ZFC set function. -/
def eval (n) : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n :=
evalAux.1
#align pSet.resp.eval PSet.Resp.eval
theorem eval_val {n f x} :
(@eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) ⟦x⟧ = eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align pSet.resp.eval_val PSet.Resp.eval_val
end Resp
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary pre-set
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class inductive Definable (n) : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n → Type (u + 1)
| mk (f) : Definable n (Resp.eval n f)
#align pSet.definable PSet.Definable
attribute [instance] Definable.mk
/-- The evaluation of a function respecting equivalence is definable, by that same function. -/
def Definable.EqMk {n} (f) :
∀ {s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n} (_ : Resp.eval _ f = s), Definable n s
| _, rfl => ⟨f⟩
#align pSet.definable.eq_mk PSet.Definable.EqMk
/-- Turns a definable function into a function that respects equivalence. -/
def Definable.Resp {n} : ∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [Definable n s], Resp n
| _, ⟨f⟩ => f
#align pSet.definable.resp PSet.Definable.Resp
theorem Definable.eq {n} :
∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [H : Definable n s], (@Definable.Resp n s H).eval _ = s
| _, ⟨_⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.definable.eq PSet.Definable.eq
end PSet
namespace Classical
open PSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allDefinable : ∀ {n} (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n), Definable n F
| 0, F =>
let p := @Quotient.exists_rep PSet _ F
@Definable.EqMk 0 ⟨choose p, Equiv.rfl⟩ _ (choose_spec p)
| n + 1, (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1)) => by
have I : (x : ZFSet) → Definable n (F x) := fun x => allDefinable (F x)
refine @Definable.EqMk (n + 1) ⟨fun x : PSet => (@Definable.Resp _ _ (I ⟦x⟧)).1, ?_⟩ _ ?_
· dsimp [Arity.Equiv]
intro x y h
rw [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]
exact (Definable.Resp (F ⟦y⟧)).2
refine funext fun q => Quotient.inductionOn q fun x => ?_
simp_rw [Resp.eval_val, Resp.f]
exact @Definable.eq _ (F ⟦x⟧) (I ⟦x⟧)
#align classical.all_definable Classical.allDefinable
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
#align Set.mk ZFSet.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
#align Set.mk_eq ZFSet.mk_eq
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
#align Set.mk_out ZFSet.mk_out
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
#align Set.eq ZFSet.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
#align Set.sound ZFSet.sound
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
#align Set.exact ZFSet.exact
@[simp]
theorem eval_mk {n f x} :
(@Resp.eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) (mk x) = Resp.eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align Set.eval_mk ZFSet.eval_mk
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PSet.Mem fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
#align Set.mem ZFSet.Mem
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mk_mem_iff ZFSet.mk_mem_iff
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align Set.to_set ZFSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mem_to_set ZFSet.mem_toSet
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
cases' hb with i h
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
#align Set.small_to_set ZFSet.small_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align Set.nonempty ZFSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_def ZFSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_of_mem ZFSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_to_set_iff ZFSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
#align Set.subset ZFSet.Subset
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
#align Set.has_subset ZFSet.hasSubset
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.subset_def ZFSet.subset_def
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
#align Set.subset_iff ZFSet.subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
#align Set.to_set_subset_iff ZFSet.toSet_subset_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
#align Set.ext ZFSet.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x = y ↔ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h], ext⟩
#align Set.ext_iff ZFSet.ext_iff
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
#align Set.to_set_injective ZFSet.toSet_injective
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.to_set_inj ZFSet.toSet_inj
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
#align Set.empty ZFSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
#align Set.not_mem_empty ZFSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align Set.to_set_empty ZFSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
#align Set.empty_subset ZFSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 802 | 802 | theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by | simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectLimit
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Algebra
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
#align_import field_theory.is_alg_closed.algebraic_closure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
/-!
# Algebraic Closure
In this file we construct the algebraic closure of a field
## Main Definitions
- `AlgebraicClosure k` is an algebraic closure of `k` (in the same universe).
It is constructed by taking the polynomial ring generated by indeterminates `x_f`
corresponding to monic irreducible polynomials `f` with coefficients in `k`, and quotienting
out by a maximal ideal containing every `f(x_f)`, and then repeating this step countably
many times. See Exercise 1.13 in Atiyah--Macdonald.
## Tags
algebraic closure, algebraically closed
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable (k : Type u) [Field k]
namespace AlgebraicClosure
open MvPolynomial
/-- The subtype of monic irreducible polynomials -/
abbrev MonicIrreducible : Type u :=
{ f : k[X] // Monic f ∧ Irreducible f }
#align algebraic_closure.monic_irreducible AlgebraicClosure.MonicIrreducible
/-- Sends a monic irreducible polynomial `f` to `f(x_f)` where `x_f` is a formal indeterminate. -/
def evalXSelf (f : MonicIrreducible k) : MvPolynomial (MonicIrreducible k) k :=
Polynomial.eval₂ MvPolynomial.C (X f) f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_closure.eval_X_self AlgebraicClosure.evalXSelf
/-- The span of `f(x_f)` across monic irreducible polynomials `f` where `x_f` is an
indeterminate. -/
def spanEval : Ideal (MvPolynomial (MonicIrreducible k) k) :=
Ideal.span <| Set.range <| evalXSelf k
#align algebraic_closure.span_eval AlgebraicClosure.spanEval
/-- Given a finset of monic irreducible polynomials, construct an algebra homomorphism to the
splitting field of the product of the polynomials sending each indeterminate `x_f` represented by
the polynomial `f` in the finset to a root of `f`. -/
def toSplittingField (s : Finset (MonicIrreducible k)) :
MvPolynomial (MonicIrreducible k) k →ₐ[k] SplittingField (∏ x ∈ s, x : k[X]) :=
MvPolynomial.aeval fun f =>
if hf : f ∈ s then
rootOfSplits _
((splits_prod_iff _ fun (j : MonicIrreducible k) _ => j.2.2.ne_zero).1
(SplittingField.splits _) f hf)
(mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 f.2.2.not_unit)
else 37
#align algebraic_closure.to_splitting_field AlgebraicClosure.toSplittingField
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsAlgClosed/AlgebraicClosure.lean | 77 | 81 | theorem toSplittingField_evalXSelf {s : Finset (MonicIrreducible k)} {f} (hf : f ∈ s) :
toSplittingField k s (evalXSelf k f) = 0 := by |
rw [toSplittingField, evalXSelf, ← AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, hom_eval₂, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom,
MvPolynomial.aeval_X, dif_pos hf, ← MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq, AlgHom.comp_algebraMap]
exact map_rootOfSplits _ _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Jensen
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
#align_import analysis.convex.normed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a63928c34ec358b5edcda2bf7513c50052a5230f"
/-!
# Topological and metric properties of convex sets in normed spaces
We prove the following facts:
* `convexOn_norm`, `convexOn_dist` : norm and distance to a fixed point is convex on any convex
set;
* `convexOn_univ_norm`, `convexOn_univ_dist` : norm and distance to a fixed point is convex on
the whole space;
* `convexHull_ediam`, `convexHull_diam` : convex hull of a set has the same (e)metric diameter
as the original set;
* `bounded_convexHull` : convex hull of a set is bounded if and only if the original set
is bounded.
-/
variable {ι : Type*} {E P : Type*}
open Metric Set
open scoped Convex
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [PseudoMetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor E P]
variable {s t : Set E}
/-- The norm on a real normed space is convex on any convex set. See also `Seminorm.convexOn`
and `convexOn_univ_norm`. -/
theorem convexOn_norm (hs : Convex ℝ s) : ConvexOn ℝ s norm :=
⟨hs, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb _ =>
calc
‖a • x + b • y‖ ≤ ‖a • x‖ + ‖b • y‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ = a * ‖x‖ + b * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg ha, Real.norm_of_nonneg hb]⟩
#align convex_on_norm convexOn_norm
/-- The norm on a real normed space is convex on the whole space. See also `Seminorm.convexOn`
and `convexOn_norm`. -/
theorem convexOn_univ_norm : ConvexOn ℝ univ (norm : E → ℝ) :=
convexOn_norm convex_univ
#align convex_on_univ_norm convexOn_univ_norm
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Normed.lean | 53 | 55 | theorem convexOn_dist (z : E) (hs : Convex ℝ s) : ConvexOn ℝ s fun z' => dist z' z := by |
simpa [dist_eq_norm, preimage_preimage] using
(convexOn_norm (hs.translate (-z))).comp_affineMap (AffineMap.id ℝ E - AffineMap.const ℝ E z)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
#align_import topology.support from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d90e4e186f1d18e375dcd4e5b5f6364b01cb3e46"
/-!
# The topological support of a function
In this file we define the topological support of a function `f`, `tsupport f`, as the closure of
the support of `f`.
Furthermore, we say that `f` has compact support if the topological support of `f` is compact.
## Main definitions
* `mulTSupport` & `tsupport`
* `HasCompactMulSupport` & `HasCompactSupport`
## Implementation Notes
* We write all lemmas for multiplicative functions, and use `@[to_additive]` to get the more common
additive versions.
* We do not put the definitions in the `Function` namespace, following many other topological
definitions that are in the root namespace (compare `Embedding` vs `Function.Embedding`).
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology
variable {X α α' β γ δ M E R : Type*}
section One
variable [One α] [TopologicalSpace X]
/-- The topological support of a function is the closure of its support, i.e. the closure of the
set of all elements where the function is not equal to 1. -/
@[to_additive " The topological support of a function is the closure of its support. i.e. the
closure of the set of all elements where the function is nonzero. "]
def mulTSupport (f : X → α) : Set X := closure (mulSupport f)
#align mul_tsupport mulTSupport
#align tsupport tsupport
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_mulTSupport (f : X → α) : mulSupport f ⊆ mulTSupport f :=
subset_closure
#align subset_mul_tsupport subset_mulTSupport
#align subset_tsupport subset_tsupport
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosed_mulTSupport (f : X → α) : IsClosed (mulTSupport f) :=
isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_mul_tsupport isClosed_mulTSupport
#align is_closed_tsupport isClosed_tsupport
@[to_additive]
theorem mulTSupport_eq_empty_iff {f : X → α} : mulTSupport f = ∅ ↔ f = 1 := by
rw [mulTSupport, closure_empty_iff, mulSupport_eq_empty_iff]
#align mul_tsupport_eq_empty_iff mulTSupport_eq_empty_iff
#align tsupport_eq_empty_iff tsupport_eq_empty_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem image_eq_one_of_nmem_mulTSupport {f : X → α} {x : X} (hx : x ∉ mulTSupport f) : f x = 1 :=
mulSupport_subset_iff'.mp (subset_mulTSupport f) x hx
#align image_eq_one_of_nmem_mul_tsupport image_eq_one_of_nmem_mulTSupport
#align image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport
@[to_additive]
theorem range_subset_insert_image_mulTSupport (f : X → α) :
range f ⊆ insert 1 (f '' mulTSupport f) :=
(range_subset_insert_image_mulSupport f).trans <|
insert_subset_insert <| image_subset _ subset_closure
#align range_subset_insert_image_mul_tsupport range_subset_insert_image_mulTSupport
#align range_subset_insert_image_tsupport range_subset_insert_image_tsupport
@[to_additive]
theorem range_eq_image_mulTSupport_or (f : X → α) :
range f = f '' mulTSupport f ∨ range f = insert 1 (f '' mulTSupport f) :=
(wcovBy_insert _ _).eq_or_eq (image_subset_range _ _) (range_subset_insert_image_mulTSupport f)
#align range_eq_image_mul_tsupport_or range_eq_image_mulTSupport_or
#align range_eq_image_tsupport_or range_eq_image_tsupport_or
theorem tsupport_mul_subset_left {α : Type*} [MulZeroClass α] {f g : X → α} :
(tsupport fun x => f x * g x) ⊆ tsupport f :=
closure_mono (support_mul_subset_left _ _)
#align tsupport_mul_subset_left tsupport_mul_subset_left
theorem tsupport_mul_subset_right {α : Type*} [MulZeroClass α] {f g : X → α} :
(tsupport fun x => f x * g x) ⊆ tsupport g :=
closure_mono (support_mul_subset_right _ _)
#align tsupport_mul_subset_right tsupport_mul_subset_right
end One
theorem tsupport_smul_subset_left {M α} [TopologicalSpace X] [Zero M] [Zero α] [SMulWithZero M α]
(f : X → M) (g : X → α) : (tsupport fun x => f x • g x) ⊆ tsupport f :=
closure_mono <| support_smul_subset_left f g
#align tsupport_smul_subset_left tsupport_smul_subset_left
theorem tsupport_smul_subset_right {M α} [TopologicalSpace X] [Zero α] [SMulZeroClass M α]
(f : X → M) (g : X → α) : (tsupport fun x => f x • g x) ⊆ tsupport g :=
closure_mono <| support_smul_subset_right f g
@[to_additive]
theorem mulTSupport_mul [TopologicalSpace X] [Monoid α] {f g : X → α} :
(mulTSupport fun x ↦ f x * g x) ⊆ mulTSupport f ∪ mulTSupport g :=
closure_minimal
((mulSupport_mul f g).trans (union_subset_union (subset_mulTSupport _) (subset_mulTSupport _)))
(isClosed_closure.union isClosed_closure)
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α']
variable [One β] [One γ] [One δ]
variable {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {m : β → γ → δ} {x : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_mulTSupport_iff_eventuallyEq : x ∉ mulTSupport f ↔ f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 := by
simp_rw [mulTSupport, mem_closure_iff_nhds, not_forall, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, exists_prop,
← disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, disjoint_mulSupport_iff, eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem]
#align not_mem_mul_tsupport_iff_eventually_eq not_mem_mulTSupport_iff_eventuallyEq
#align not_mem_tsupport_iff_eventually_eq not_mem_tsupport_iff_eventuallyEq
@[to_additive]
theorem continuous_of_mulTSupport [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ mulTSupport f, ContinuousAt f x) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (em _).elim (hf x) fun hx =>
(@continuousAt_const _ _ _ _ _ 1).congr (not_mem_mulTSupport_iff_eventuallyEq.mp hx).symm
#align continuous_of_mul_tsupport continuous_of_mulTSupport
#align continuous_of_tsupport continuous_of_tsupport
end
/-! ## Functions with compact support -/
section CompactSupport
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α']
variable [One β] [One γ] [One δ]
variable {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {m : β → γ → δ} {x : α}
/-- A function `f` *has compact multiplicative support* or is *compactly supported* if the closure
of the multiplicative support of `f` is compact. In a T₂ space this is equivalent to `f` being equal
to `1` outside a compact set. -/
@[to_additive " A function `f` *has compact support* or is *compactly supported* if the closure of
the support of `f` is compact. In a T₂ space this is equivalent to `f` being equal to `0` outside a
compact set. "]
def HasCompactMulSupport (f : α → β) : Prop :=
IsCompact (mulTSupport f)
#align has_compact_mul_support HasCompactMulSupport
#align has_compact_support HasCompactSupport
@[to_additive]
theorem hasCompactMulSupport_def : HasCompactMulSupport f ↔ IsCompact (closure (mulSupport f)) := by
rfl
#align has_compact_mul_support_def hasCompactMulSupport_def
#align has_compact_support_def hasCompactSupport_def
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_compact_iff_hasCompactMulSupport [R1Space α] :
(∃ K : Set α, IsCompact K ∧ ∀ x, x ∉ K → f x = 1) ↔ HasCompactMulSupport f := by
simp_rw [← nmem_mulSupport, ← mem_compl_iff, ← subset_def, compl_subset_compl,
hasCompactMulSupport_def, exists_isCompact_superset_iff]
#align exists_compact_iff_has_compact_mul_support exists_compact_iff_hasCompactMulSupport
#align exists_compact_iff_has_compact_support exists_compact_iff_hasCompactSupport
namespace HasCompactMulSupport
@[to_additive]
theorem intro [R1Space α] {K : Set α} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hfK : ∀ x, x ∉ K → f x = 1) : HasCompactMulSupport f :=
exists_compact_iff_hasCompactMulSupport.mp ⟨K, hK, hfK⟩
#align has_compact_mul_support.intro HasCompactMulSupport.intro
#align has_compact_support.intro HasCompactSupport.intro
@[to_additive]
theorem intro' {K : Set α} (hK : IsCompact K) (h'K : IsClosed K)
(hfK : ∀ x, x ∉ K → f x = 1) : HasCompactMulSupport f := by
have : mulTSupport f ⊆ K := by
rw [← h'K.closure_eq]
apply closure_mono (mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 hfK)
exact IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset hK ( isClosed_mulTSupport f) this
@[to_additive]
theorem of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact [R1Space α] {K : Set α}
(hK : IsCompact K) (h : mulSupport f ⊆ K) : HasCompactMulSupport f :=
hK.closure_of_subset h
@[to_additive]
theorem isCompact (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) : IsCompact (mulTSupport f) :=
hf
#align has_compact_mul_support.is_compact HasCompactMulSupport.isCompact
#align has_compact_support.is_compact HasCompactSupport.isCompact
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.hasCompactMulSupport_iff_eventuallyEq :
HasCompactMulSupport f ↔ f =ᶠ[coclosedCompact α] 1 :=
mem_coclosedCompact_iff.symm
#align has_compact_mul_support_iff_eventually_eq hasCompactMulSupport_iff_eventuallyEq
#align has_compact_support_iff_eventually_eq hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k) (h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) :
IsCompact (range f) := by
cases' range_eq_image_or_of_mulSupport_subset h'f with h2 h2 <;> rw [h2]
exacts [hk.image hf, (hk.image hf).insert 1]
@[to_additive]
theorem isCompact_range [TopologicalSpace β] (h : HasCompactMulSupport f)
(hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (range f) :=
isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf h (subset_mulTSupport f)
#align has_compact_mul_support.is_compact_range HasCompactMulSupport.isCompact_range
#align has_compact_support.is_compact_range HasCompactSupport.isCompact_range
@[to_additive]
theorem mono' {f' : α → γ} (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f)
(hff' : mulSupport f' ⊆ mulTSupport f) : HasCompactMulSupport f' :=
IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset hf isClosed_closure <| closure_minimal hff' isClosed_closure
#align has_compact_mul_support.mono' HasCompactMulSupport.mono'
#align has_compact_support.mono' HasCompactSupport.mono'
@[to_additive]
theorem mono {f' : α → γ} (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f)
(hff' : mulSupport f' ⊆ mulSupport f) : HasCompactMulSupport f' :=
hf.mono' <| hff'.trans subset_closure
#align has_compact_mul_support.mono HasCompactMulSupport.mono
#align has_compact_support.mono HasCompactSupport.mono
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_left (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) (hg : g 1 = 1) :
HasCompactMulSupport (g ∘ f) :=
hf.mono <| mulSupport_comp_subset hg f
#align has_compact_mul_support.comp_left HasCompactMulSupport.comp_left
#align has_compact_support.comp_left HasCompactSupport.comp_left
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.hasCompactMulSupport_comp_left (hg : ∀ {x}, g x = 1 ↔ x = 1) :
HasCompactMulSupport (g ∘ f) ↔ HasCompactMulSupport f := by
simp_rw [hasCompactMulSupport_def, mulSupport_comp_eq g (@hg) f]
#align has_compact_mul_support_comp_left hasCompactMulSupport_comp_left
#align has_compact_support_comp_left hasCompactSupport_comp_left
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_closedEmbedding (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) {g : α' → α}
(hg : ClosedEmbedding g) : HasCompactMulSupport (f ∘ g) := by
rw [hasCompactMulSupport_def, Function.mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
refine IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hg.isCompact_preimage hf) isClosed_closure ?_
rw [hg.toEmbedding.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image]
exact preimage_mono (closure_mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _)
#align has_compact_mul_support.comp_closed_embedding HasCompactMulSupport.comp_closedEmbedding
#align has_compact_support.comp_closed_embedding HasCompactSupport.comp_closedEmbedding
@[to_additive]
theorem comp₂_left (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f)
(hf₂ : HasCompactMulSupport f₂) (hm : m 1 1 = 1) :
HasCompactMulSupport fun x => m (f x) (f₂ x) := by
rw [hasCompactMulSupport_iff_eventuallyEq] at hf hf₂ ⊢
#adaptation_note /-- `nightly-2024-03-11`
If we *either* (1) remove the type annotations on the
binders in the following `fun` or (2) revert `simp only` to `simp_rw`, `to_additive` fails
because an `OfNat.ofNat 1` is not replaced with `0`. Notably, as of this nightly, what used to
look like `OfNat.ofNat (nat_lit 1) x` in the proof term now looks like
`OfNat.ofNat (OfNat.ofNat (α := ℕ) (nat_lit 1)) x`, and this seems to trip up `to_additive`.
-/
filter_upwards [hf, hf₂] using fun x (hx : f x = (1 : α → β) x) (hx₂ : f₂ x = (1 : α → γ) x) => by
simp only [hx, hx₂, Pi.one_apply, hm]
#align has_compact_mul_support.comp₂_left HasCompactMulSupport.comp₂_left
#align has_compact_support.comp₂_left HasCompactSupport.comp₂_left
@[to_additive]
lemma isCompact_preimage [TopologicalSpace β]
(h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) (hf : Continuous f) {k : Set β} (hk : IsClosed k)
(h'k : 1 ∉ k) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' k) := by
apply IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset h'f (hk.preimage hf) (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
apply subset_mulTSupport
aesop
variable [T2Space α'] (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) {g : α → α'} (cont : Continuous g)
@[to_additive]
theorem mulTSupport_extend_one_subset :
mulTSupport (g.extend f 1) ⊆ g '' mulTSupport f :=
(hf.image cont).isClosed.closure_subset_iff.mpr <|
mulSupport_extend_one_subset.trans (image_subset g subset_closure)
@[to_additive]
theorem extend_one : HasCompactMulSupport (g.extend f 1) :=
HasCompactMulSupport.of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact (hf.image cont)
(subset_closure.trans <| hf.mulTSupport_extend_one_subset cont)
@[to_additive]
theorem mulTSupport_extend_one (inj : g.Injective) :
mulTSupport (g.extend f 1) = g '' mulTSupport f :=
(hf.mulTSupport_extend_one_subset cont).antisymm <|
(image_closure_subset_closure_image cont).trans
(closure_mono (mulSupport_extend_one inj).superset)
@[to_additive]
theorem continuous_extend_one [TopologicalSpace β] {U : Set α'} (hU : IsOpen U) {f : U → β}
(cont : Continuous f) (supp : HasCompactMulSupport f) :
Continuous (Subtype.val.extend f 1) :=
continuous_of_mulTSupport fun x h ↦ by
rw [show x = ↑(⟨x, Subtype.coe_image_subset _ _
(supp.mulTSupport_extend_one_subset continuous_subtype_val h)⟩ : U) by rfl,
← (hU.openEmbedding_subtype_val).continuousAt_iff, extend_comp Subtype.val_injective]
exact cont.continuousAt
end HasCompactMulSupport
end CompactSupport
/-! ## Functions with compact support: algebraic operations -/
section CompactSupport2
section Monoid
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Monoid β]
variable {f f' : α → β} {x : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem HasCompactMulSupport.mul (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) (hf' : HasCompactMulSupport f') :
HasCompactMulSupport (f * f') := hf.comp₂_left hf' (mul_one 1)
#align has_compact_mul_support.mul HasCompactMulSupport.mul
#align has_compact_support.add HasCompactSupport.add
end Monoid
section DistribMulAction
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [MonoidWithZero R] [AddMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M]
variable {f : α → R} {f' : α → M} {x : α}
theorem HasCompactSupport.smul_left (hf : HasCompactSupport f') : HasCompactSupport (f • f') := by
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono fun x hx => by simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply', hx, Pi.zero_apply, smul_zero]
#align has_compact_support.smul_left HasCompactSupport.smul_left
end DistribMulAction
section SMulWithZero
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Zero R] [Zero M] [SMulWithZero R M]
variable {f : α → R} {f' : α → M} {x : α}
| Mathlib/Topology/Support.lean | 348 | 350 | theorem HasCompactSupport.smul_right (hf : HasCompactSupport f) : HasCompactSupport (f • f') := by |
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono fun x hx => by simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply', hx, Pi.zero_apply, zero_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.l2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ContinuousMapDense
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Periodic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.StoneWeierstrass
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FundThmCalculus
#align_import analysis.fourier.add_circle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
/-!
# Fourier analysis on the additive circle
This file contains basic results on Fourier series for functions on the additive circle
`AddCircle T = ℝ / ℤ • T`.
## Main definitions
* `haarAddCircle`, Haar measure on `AddCircle T`, normalized to have total measure `1`. (Note
that this is not the same normalisation as the standard measure defined in `Integral.Periodic`,
so we do not declare it as a `MeasureSpace` instance, to avoid confusion.)
* for `n : ℤ`, `fourier n` is the monomial `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`,
bundled as a continuous map from `AddCircle T` to `ℂ`.
* `fourierBasis` is the Hilbert basis of `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` given by the images of the
monomials `fourier n`.
* `fourierCoeff f n`, for `f : AddCircle T → E` (with `E` a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space), is
the `n`-th Fourier coefficient of `f`, defined as an integral over `AddCircle T`. The lemma
`fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, a + T]` for any real
`a`.
* `fourierCoeffOn`, for `f : ℝ → E` and `a < b` reals, is the `n`-th Fourier
coefficient of the unique periodic function of period `b - a` which agrees with `f` on `(a, b]`.
The lemma `fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, b]`.
## Main statements
The theorem `span_fourier_closure_eq_top` states that the span of the monomials `fourier n` is
dense in `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`, i.e. that its `Submodule.topologicalClosure` is `⊤`. This follows
from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem after checking that the span is a subalgebra, is closed under
conjugation, and separates points.
Using this and general theory on approximation of Lᵖ functions by continuous functions, we deduce
(`span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top`) that for any `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the span of the Fourier monomials is
dense in the Lᵖ space of `AddCircle T`. For `p = 2` we show (`orthonormal_fourier`) that the
monomials are also orthonormal, so they form a Hilbert basis for L², which is named as
`fourierBasis`; in particular, for `L²` functions `f`, the Fourier series of `f` converges to `f`
in the `L²` topology (`hasSum_fourier_series_L2`). Parseval's identity, `tsum_sq_fourierCoeff`, is
a direct consequence.
For continuous maps `f : AddCircle T → ℂ`, the theorem
`hasSum_fourier_series_of_summable` states that if the sequence of Fourier
coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series `∑ (i : ℤ), fourierCoeff f i * fourier i`
converges to `f` in the uniform-convergence topology of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped ENNReal ComplexConjugate Real
open TopologicalSpace ContinuousMap MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Algebra Submodule Set
variable {T : ℝ}
namespace AddCircle
/-! ### Measure on `AddCircle T`
In this file we use the Haar measure on `AddCircle T` normalised to have total measure 1 (which is
**not** the same as the standard measure defined in `Topology.Instances.AddCircle`). -/
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- Haar measure on the additive circle, normalised to have total measure 1. -/
def haarAddCircle : Measure (AddCircle T) :=
addHaarMeasure ⊤
#align add_circle.haar_add_circle AddCircle.haarAddCircle
-- Porting note: was `deriving IsAddHaarMeasure` on `haarAddCircle`
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
Measure.isAddHaarMeasure_addHaarMeasure ⊤
instance : IsProbabilityMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
IsProbabilityMeasure.mk addHaarMeasure_self
theorem volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle :
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T • (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
rfl
#align add_circle.volume_eq_smul_haar_add_circle AddCircle.volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle
end AddCircle
open AddCircle
section Monomials
/-- The family of exponential monomials `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and
considered as bundled continuous maps from `ℝ / ℤ • T` to `ℂ`. -/
def fourier (n : ℤ) : C(AddCircle T, ℂ) where
toFun x := toCircle (n • x :)
continuous_toFun := continuous_induced_dom.comp <| continuous_toCircle.comp <| continuous_zsmul _
#align fourier fourier
@[simp]
theorem fourier_apply {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier n x = toCircle (n • x :) :=
rfl
#align fourier_apply fourier_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_coe_apply'`
theorem fourier_coe_apply {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
fourier n (x : AddCircle T) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [fourier_apply, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, toCircle, Function.Periodic.lift_coe,
expMapCircle_apply, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_div, Complex.ofReal_mul, zsmul_eq_mul,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_intCast]
norm_num
congr 1; ring
#align fourier_coe_apply fourier_coe_apply
@[simp]
theorem fourier_coe_apply' {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
toCircle (n • (x : AddCircle T) :) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_coe_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_zero {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 0 x = 1 := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp only [fourier_coe_apply]
norm_num
#align fourier_zero fourier_zero
@[simp]
theorem fourier_zero' {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T 0 = (1 : ℂ) := by
have : fourier 0 x = @toCircle T 0 := by rw [fourier_apply, zero_smul]
rw [← this]; exact fourier_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is *also* `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_eval_zero (n : ℤ) : fourier n (0 : AddCircle T) = 1 := by
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, fourier_coe_apply, Complex.ofReal_zero, mul_zero,
zero_div, Complex.exp_zero]
#align fourier_eval_zero fourier_eval_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem fourier_one {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 1 x = toCircle x := by rw [fourier_apply, one_zsmul]
#align fourier_one fourier_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_neg'`
theorem fourier_neg {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (-n) x = conj (fourier n x) := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp_rw [fourier_apply, toCircle]
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul]
simp_rw [Function.Periodic.lift_coe, ← coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, ← expMapCircle_neg,
neg_smul, mul_neg]
#align fourier_neg fourier_neg
@[simp]
theorem fourier_neg' {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T (-(n • x)) = conj (fourier n x) := by
rw [← neg_smul, ← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_neg
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_add'`
theorem fourier_add {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (m+n) x = fourier m x * fourier n x := by
simp_rw [fourier_apply, add_zsmul, toCircle_add, coe_mul_unitSphere]
#align fourier_add fourier_add
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/AddCircle.lean | 172 | 174 | theorem fourier_add' {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} :
toCircle ((m + n) • x :) = fourier m x * fourier n x := by |
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_add
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Julian Kuelshammer, Heather Macbeth, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.chebyshev from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d774451114d6045faeb6751c396bea1eb9058946"
/-!
# Chebyshev polynomials
The Chebyshev polynomials are families of polynomials indexed by `ℤ`,
with integral coefficients.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.U`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
## Main statements
* The formal derivative of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind is a scalar multiple of the
Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.mul_T`, twice the product of the `m`-th and `k`-th Chebyshev polynomials of
the first kind is the sum of the `m + k`-th and `m - k`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first
kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_mul`, the `(m * n)`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is the
composition of the `m`-th and `n`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.
## Implementation details
Since Chebyshev polynomials have interesting behaviour over the complex numbers and modulo `p`,
we define them to have coefficients in an arbitrary commutative ring, even though
technically `ℤ` would suffice.
The benefit of allowing arbitrary coefficient rings, is that the statements afterwards are clean,
and do not have `map (Int.castRingHom R)` interfering all the time.
## References
[Lionel Ponton, _Roots of the Chebyshev polynomials: A purely algebraic approach_]
[ponton2020chebyshev]
## TODO
* Redefine and/or relate the definition of Chebyshev polynomials to `LinearRecurrence`.
* Add explicit formula involving square roots for Chebyshev polynomials
* Compute zeroes and extrema of Chebyshev polynomials.
* Prove that the roots of the Chebyshev polynomials (except 0) are irrational.
* Prove minimax properties of Chebyshev polynomials.
-/
namespace Polynomial.Chebyshev
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `T` `U` `X`
open Polynomial
variable (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
/-- `T n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def T : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * T (n + 1) - T n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * T (-n) - T (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T Polynomial.Chebyshev.T
/-- Induction principle used for proving facts about Chebyshev polynomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induct (motive : ℤ → Prop)
(zero : motive 0)
(one : motive 1)
(add_two : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (↑n + 1) → motive ↑n → motive (↑n + 2))
(neg_add_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (-↑n) → motive (-↑n + 1) → motive (-↑n - 1)) :
∀ (a : ℤ), motive a :=
T.induct Unit motive zero one add_two fun n hn hnm => by
simpa only [Int.negSucc_eq, neg_add] using neg_add_one n hn hnm
@[simp]
theorem T_add_two : ∀ n, T R (n + 2) = 2 * X * T R (n + 1) - T R n
| (k : ℕ) => T.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) T.eq_4 R k
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_add_two Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_add_two
theorem T_add_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_sub_two (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 2) = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem T_sub_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_eq (n : ℤ) : T R n = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_of_two_le Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_eq
@[simp]
theorem T_zero : T R 0 = 1 := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_zero Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_zero
@[simp]
theorem T_one : T R 1 = X := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_one Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_one
theorem T_neg_one : T R (-1) = X := (by ring : 2 * X * 1 - X = X)
theorem T_two : T R 2 = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
simpa [pow_two, mul_assoc] using T_add_two R 0
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_two Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_two
@[simp]
theorem T_neg (n : ℤ) : T R (-n) = T R n := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => rfl
| one => show 2 * X * 1 - X = X; ring
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_two R n
have h₂ := T_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X:R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 - h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_one R n
have h₂ := T_sub_one R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X:R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ - h₂
theorem T_natAbs (n : ℤ) : T R n.natAbs = T R n := by
obtain h | h := Int.natAbs_eq n <;> nth_rw 2 [h]; simp
theorem T_neg_two : T R (-2) = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by simp [T_two]
/-- `U n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def U : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => 2 * X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * U (n + 1) - U n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * U (-n) - U (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U Polynomial.Chebyshev.U
@[simp]
theorem U_add_two : ∀ n, U R (n + 2) = 2 * X * U R (n + 1) - U R n
| (k : ℕ) => U.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) U.eq_4 R k
theorem U_add_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n + 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 2) = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem U_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_eq (n : ℤ) : U R n = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_of_two_le Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_eq
@[simp]
theorem U_zero : U R 0 = 1 := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_zero Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_zero
@[simp]
theorem U_one : U R 1 = 2 * X := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_one Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_one
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_one : U R (-1) = 0 := by simpa using U_sub_one R 0
theorem U_two : U R 2 = 4 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
have := U_add_two R 0
simp only [zero_add, U_one, U_zero] at this
linear_combination this
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_two Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_two
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_two : U R (-2) = -1 := by
simpa [zero_sub, Int.reduceNeg, U_neg_one, mul_zero, U_zero] using U_sub_two R 0
theorem U_neg_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 1) = -U R (n - 1) := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_one R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n - 1)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_eq R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
theorem U_neg (n : ℤ) : U R (-n) = -U R (n - 2) := by simpa [sub_sub] using U_neg_sub_one R (n - 1)
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 2) = -U R n := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] using U_neg R (n + 2)
theorem U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T (n : ℤ) : U R (n + 1) = X * U R n + T R (n + 1) := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp [two_mul]
| one => simp [U_two, T_two]; ring
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_two R (n + 1)
have h₂ := U_add_two R n
have h₃ := T_add_two R (n + 1)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) -h₃ - (X:R[X]) * h₂ + h₁ + 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 - ih2
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_two R (-n - 1)
have h₂ := U_add_two R (-n)
have h₃ := T_add_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) -h₃ + h₂ - (X:R[X]) * h₁ - ih2 + 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T
theorem T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U (n : ℤ) : T R n = U R n - X * U R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) - U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T R (n - 1)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U
theorem T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 2) = X * T R (n + 1) - (1 - X ^ 2) * U R n := by
have h₁ := U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T R n
have h₂ := U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T R (n + 1)
have h₃ := U_add_two R n
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) h₃ - h₂ + (X:R[X]) * h₁
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U
theorem one_sub_X_sq_mul_U_eq_pol_in_T (n : ℤ) :
(1 - X ^ 2) * U R n = X * T R (n + 1) - T R (n + 2) := by
linear_combination T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U R n
#align polynomial.chebyshev.one_sub_X_sq_mul_U_eq_pol_in_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.one_sub_X_sq_mul_U_eq_pol_in_T
variable {R S}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Chebyshev.lean | 241 | 250 | theorem map_T (f : R →+* S) (n : ℤ) : map f (T R n) = T S n := by |
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp_rw [T_add_two, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_X,
ih1, ih2];
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp_rw [T_sub_one, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_X, ih1,
ih2];
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.l2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ContinuousMapDense
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Periodic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.StoneWeierstrass
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FundThmCalculus
#align_import analysis.fourier.add_circle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
/-!
# Fourier analysis on the additive circle
This file contains basic results on Fourier series for functions on the additive circle
`AddCircle T = ℝ / ℤ • T`.
## Main definitions
* `haarAddCircle`, Haar measure on `AddCircle T`, normalized to have total measure `1`. (Note
that this is not the same normalisation as the standard measure defined in `Integral.Periodic`,
so we do not declare it as a `MeasureSpace` instance, to avoid confusion.)
* for `n : ℤ`, `fourier n` is the monomial `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`,
bundled as a continuous map from `AddCircle T` to `ℂ`.
* `fourierBasis` is the Hilbert basis of `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` given by the images of the
monomials `fourier n`.
* `fourierCoeff f n`, for `f : AddCircle T → E` (with `E` a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space), is
the `n`-th Fourier coefficient of `f`, defined as an integral over `AddCircle T`. The lemma
`fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, a + T]` for any real
`a`.
* `fourierCoeffOn`, for `f : ℝ → E` and `a < b` reals, is the `n`-th Fourier
coefficient of the unique periodic function of period `b - a` which agrees with `f` on `(a, b]`.
The lemma `fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, b]`.
## Main statements
The theorem `span_fourier_closure_eq_top` states that the span of the monomials `fourier n` is
dense in `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`, i.e. that its `Submodule.topologicalClosure` is `⊤`. This follows
from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem after checking that the span is a subalgebra, is closed under
conjugation, and separates points.
Using this and general theory on approximation of Lᵖ functions by continuous functions, we deduce
(`span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top`) that for any `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the span of the Fourier monomials is
dense in the Lᵖ space of `AddCircle T`. For `p = 2` we show (`orthonormal_fourier`) that the
monomials are also orthonormal, so they form a Hilbert basis for L², which is named as
`fourierBasis`; in particular, for `L²` functions `f`, the Fourier series of `f` converges to `f`
in the `L²` topology (`hasSum_fourier_series_L2`). Parseval's identity, `tsum_sq_fourierCoeff`, is
a direct consequence.
For continuous maps `f : AddCircle T → ℂ`, the theorem
`hasSum_fourier_series_of_summable` states that if the sequence of Fourier
coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series `∑ (i : ℤ), fourierCoeff f i * fourier i`
converges to `f` in the uniform-convergence topology of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped ENNReal ComplexConjugate Real
open TopologicalSpace ContinuousMap MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Algebra Submodule Set
variable {T : ℝ}
namespace AddCircle
/-! ### Measure on `AddCircle T`
In this file we use the Haar measure on `AddCircle T` normalised to have total measure 1 (which is
**not** the same as the standard measure defined in `Topology.Instances.AddCircle`). -/
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- Haar measure on the additive circle, normalised to have total measure 1. -/
def haarAddCircle : Measure (AddCircle T) :=
addHaarMeasure ⊤
#align add_circle.haar_add_circle AddCircle.haarAddCircle
-- Porting note: was `deriving IsAddHaarMeasure` on `haarAddCircle`
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
Measure.isAddHaarMeasure_addHaarMeasure ⊤
instance : IsProbabilityMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
IsProbabilityMeasure.mk addHaarMeasure_self
theorem volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle :
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T • (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
rfl
#align add_circle.volume_eq_smul_haar_add_circle AddCircle.volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle
end AddCircle
open AddCircle
section Monomials
/-- The family of exponential monomials `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and
considered as bundled continuous maps from `ℝ / ℤ • T` to `ℂ`. -/
def fourier (n : ℤ) : C(AddCircle T, ℂ) where
toFun x := toCircle (n • x :)
continuous_toFun := continuous_induced_dom.comp <| continuous_toCircle.comp <| continuous_zsmul _
#align fourier fourier
@[simp]
theorem fourier_apply {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier n x = toCircle (n • x :) :=
rfl
#align fourier_apply fourier_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_coe_apply'`
theorem fourier_coe_apply {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
fourier n (x : AddCircle T) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [fourier_apply, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, toCircle, Function.Periodic.lift_coe,
expMapCircle_apply, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_div, Complex.ofReal_mul, zsmul_eq_mul,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_intCast]
norm_num
congr 1; ring
#align fourier_coe_apply fourier_coe_apply
@[simp]
theorem fourier_coe_apply' {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
toCircle (n • (x : AddCircle T) :) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_coe_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_zero {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 0 x = 1 := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp only [fourier_coe_apply]
norm_num
#align fourier_zero fourier_zero
@[simp]
theorem fourier_zero' {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T 0 = (1 : ℂ) := by
have : fourier 0 x = @toCircle T 0 := by rw [fourier_apply, zero_smul]
rw [← this]; exact fourier_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is *also* `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_eval_zero (n : ℤ) : fourier n (0 : AddCircle T) = 1 := by
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, fourier_coe_apply, Complex.ofReal_zero, mul_zero,
zero_div, Complex.exp_zero]
#align fourier_eval_zero fourier_eval_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem fourier_one {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 1 x = toCircle x := by rw [fourier_apply, one_zsmul]
#align fourier_one fourier_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_neg'`
theorem fourier_neg {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (-n) x = conj (fourier n x) := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on'
simp_rw [fourier_apply, toCircle]
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul]
simp_rw [Function.Periodic.lift_coe, ← coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, ← expMapCircle_neg,
neg_smul, mul_neg]
#align fourier_neg fourier_neg
@[simp]
theorem fourier_neg' {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T (-(n • x)) = conj (fourier n x) := by
rw [← neg_smul, ← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_neg
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `fourier_add'`
theorem fourier_add {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (m+n) x = fourier m x * fourier n x := by
simp_rw [fourier_apply, add_zsmul, toCircle_add, coe_mul_unitSphere]
#align fourier_add fourier_add
@[simp]
theorem fourier_add' {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} :
toCircle ((m + n) • x :) = fourier m x * fourier n x := by
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_add
theorem fourier_norm [Fact (0 < T)] (n : ℤ) : ‖@fourier T n‖ = 1 := by
rw [ContinuousMap.norm_eq_iSup_norm]
have : ∀ x : AddCircle T, ‖fourier n x‖ = 1 := fun x => abs_coe_circle _
simp_rw [this]
exact @ciSup_const _ _ _ Zero.instNonempty _
#align fourier_norm fourier_norm
/-- For `n ≠ 0`, a translation by `T / 2 / n` negates the function `fourier n`. -/
theorem fourier_add_half_inv_index {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hT : 0 < T) (x : AddCircle T) :
@fourier T n (x + ↑(T / 2 / n)) = -fourier n x := by
rw [fourier_apply, zsmul_add, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, toCircle_add, coe_mul_unitSphere]
have : (n : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by simpa using hn
have : (@toCircle T (n • (T / 2 / n) : ℝ) : ℂ) = -1 := by
rw [zsmul_eq_mul, toCircle, Function.Periodic.lift_coe, expMapCircle_apply]
replace hT := Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hT.ne'
convert Complex.exp_pi_mul_I using 3
field_simp; ring
rw [this]; simp
#align fourier_add_half_inv_index fourier_add_half_inv_index
/-- The star subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` . -/
def fourierSubalgebra : StarSubalgebra ℂ C(AddCircle T, ℂ) where
toSubalgebra := Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range fourier)
star_mem' := by
show Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range (fourier (T := T))) ≤
star (Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range (fourier (T := T))))
refine adjoin_le ?_
rintro - ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact subset_adjoin ⟨-n, ext fun _ => fourier_neg⟩
#align fourier_subalgebra fourierSubalgebra
/-- The star subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is in fact the
linear span of these functions. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_coe :
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (@fourierSubalgebra T).toSubalgebra = span ℂ (range (@fourier T)) := by
apply adjoin_eq_span_of_subset
refine Subset.trans ?_ Submodule.subset_span
intro x hx
refine Submonoid.closure_induction hx (fun _ => id) ⟨0, ?_⟩ ?_
· ext1 z; exact fourier_zero
· rintro _ _ ⟨m, rfl⟩ ⟨n, rfl⟩
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
ext1 z
exact fourier_add
#align fourier_subalgebra_coe fourierSubalgebra_coe
/- a post-port refactor made `fourierSubalgebra` into a `StarSubalgebra`, and eliminated
`conjInvariantSubalgebra` entirely, making this lemma irrelevant. -/
#noalign fourier_subalgebra_conj_invariant
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- The subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ`
separates points. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints : (@fourierSubalgebra T).SeparatesPoints := by
intro x y hxy
refine ⟨_, ⟨fourier 1, subset_adjoin ⟨1, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
dsimp only; rw [fourier_one, fourier_one]
contrapose! hxy
rw [Subtype.coe_inj] at hxy
exact injective_toCircle hT.elim.ne' hxy
#align fourier_subalgebra_separates_points fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints
/-- The subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is dense. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top : (@fourierSubalgebra T).topologicalClosure = ⊤ :=
ContinuousMap.starSubalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints fourierSubalgebra
fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints
#align fourier_subalgebra_closure_eq_top fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top
/-- The linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`. -/
theorem span_fourier_closure_eq_top : (span ℂ (range <| @fourier T)).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [← fourierSubalgebra_coe]
exact congr_arg (Subalgebra.toSubmodule <| StarSubalgebra.toSubalgebra ·)
fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top
#align span_fourier_closure_eq_top span_fourier_closure_eq_top
/-- The family of monomials `fourier n`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and considered as
elements of the `Lp` space of functions `AddCircle T → ℂ`. -/
abbrev fourierLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) : Lp ℂ p (@haarAddCircle T hT) :=
toLp (E := ℂ) p haarAddCircle ℂ (fourier n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align fourier_Lp fourierLp
theorem coeFn_fourierLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) :
@fourierLp T hT p _ n =ᵐ[haarAddCircle] fourier n :=
coeFn_toLp haarAddCircle (fourier n)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align coe_fn_fourier_Lp coeFn_fourierLp
/-- For each `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in
`Lp ℂ p haarAddCircle`. -/
theorem span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top {p : ℝ≥0∞} [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hp : p ≠ ∞) :
(span ℂ (range (@fourierLp T _ p _))).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
convert
(ContinuousMap.toLp_denseRange ℂ (@haarAddCircle T hT) hp ℂ).topologicalClosure_map_submodule
span_fourier_closure_eq_top
erw [map_span, range_comp]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align span_fourier_Lp_closure_eq_top span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top
/-- The monomials `fourier n` are an orthonormal set with respect to normalised Haar measure. -/
theorem orthonormal_fourier : Orthonormal ℂ (@fourierLp T _ 2 _) := by
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite]
intro i j
rw [ContinuousMap.inner_toLp (@haarAddCircle T hT) (fourier i) (fourier j)]
simp_rw [← fourier_neg, ← fourier_add]
split_ifs with h
· simp_rw [h, neg_add_self]
have : ⇑(@fourier T 0) = (fun _ => 1 : AddCircle T → ℂ) := by ext1; exact fourier_zero
rw [this, integral_const, measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, Complex.real_smul,
Complex.ofReal_one, mul_one]
have hij : -i + j ≠ 0 := by
rw [add_comm]
exact sub_ne_zero.mpr (Ne.symm h)
convert integral_eq_zero_of_add_right_eq_neg (μ := haarAddCircle)
(fourier_add_half_inv_index hij hT.elim)
#align orthonormal_fourier orthonormal_fourier
end Monomials
section ScopeHT
-- everything from here on needs `0 < T`
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
section fourierCoeff
variable {E : Type} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]
/-- The `n`-th Fourier coefficient of a function `AddCircle T → E`, for `E` a complete normed
`ℂ`-vector space, defined as the integral over `AddCircle T` of `fourier (-n) t • f t`. -/
def fourierCoeff (f : AddCircle T → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
∫ t : AddCircle T, fourier (-n) t • f t ∂haarAddCircle
#align fourier_coeff fourierCoeff
/-- The Fourier coefficients of a function on `AddCircle T` can be computed as an integral
over `[a, a + T]`, for any real `a`. -/
theorem fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral (f : AddCircle T → E) (n : ℤ) (a : ℝ) :
fourierCoeff f n = (1 / T) • ∫ x in a..a + T, @fourier T (-n) x • f x := by
have : ∀ x : ℝ, @fourier T (-n) x • f x = (fun z : AddCircle T => @fourier T (-n) z • f z) x := by
intro x; rfl
-- After leanprover/lean4#3124, we need to add `singlePass := true` to avoid an infinite loop.
simp_rw (config := {singlePass := true}) [this]
rw [fourierCoeff, AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage T a (fun z => _ • _),
volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle, integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hT.out.le,
← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hT.out.ne', one_smul]
#align fourier_coeff_eq_interval_integral fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral
theorem fourierCoeff.const_smul (f : AddCircle T → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (c • f :) n = c • fourierCoeff f n := by
simp_rw [fourierCoeff, Pi.smul_apply, ← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul,
smul_assoc, integral_smul]
#align fourier_coeff.const_smul fourierCoeff.const_smul
theorem fourierCoeff.const_mul (f : AddCircle T → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (fun x => c * f x) n = c * fourierCoeff f n :=
fourierCoeff.const_smul f c n
#align fourier_coeff.const_mul fourierCoeff.const_mul
/-- For a function on `ℝ`, the Fourier coefficients of `f` on `[a, b]` are defined as the
Fourier coefficients of the unique periodic function agreeing with `f` on `Ioc a b`. -/
def fourierCoeffOn {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIoc (b - a) a f) n
#align fourier_coeff_on fourierCoeffOn
theorem fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab f n =
(1 / (b - a)) • ∫ x in a..b, fourier (-n) (x : AddCircle (b - a)) • f x := by
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
rw [fourierCoeffOn, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral _ _ a, add_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
congr 1
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hab.le]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
rw [liftIoc_coe_apply]
rwa [add_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
#align fourier_coeff_on_eq_integral fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral
theorem fourierCoeffOn.const_smul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab (c • f) n = c • fourierCoeffOn hab f n := by
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
apply fourierCoeff.const_smul
#align fourier_coeff_on.const_smul fourierCoeffOn.const_smul
theorem fourierCoeffOn.const_mul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab (fun x => c * f x) n = c * fourierCoeffOn hab f n :=
fourierCoeffOn.const_smul _ _ _ _
#align fourier_coeff_on.const_mul fourierCoeffOn.const_mul
theorem fourierCoeff_liftIoc_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIoc T a f) n =
fourierCoeffOn (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n := by
rw [fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral, add_sub_cancel_left a T]
· congr 1
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae (ae_of_all _ fun x hx => ?_)
rw [liftIoc_coe_apply]
rwa [uIoc_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le] at hx
#align fourier_coeff_lift_Ioc_eq fourierCoeff_liftIoc_eq
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/AddCircle.lean | 377 | 385 | theorem fourierCoeff_liftIco_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIco T a f) n =
fourierCoeffOn (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n := by |
rw [fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral _ _ a, add_sub_cancel_left a T]
congr 1
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le]
iterate 2 rw [integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioo fun x hx => ?_
rw [liftIco_coe_apply (Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Univariate.M
#align_import data.qpf.univariate.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"14b69e9f3c16630440a2cbd46f1ddad0d561dee7"
/-!
# Quotients of Polynomial Functors
We assume the following:
* `P`: a polynomial functor
* `W`: its W-type
* `M`: its M-type
* `F`: a functor
We define:
* `q`: `QPF` data, representing `F` as a quotient of `P`
The main goal is to construct:
* `Fix`: the initial algebra with structure map `F Fix → Fix`.
* `Cofix`: the final coalgebra with structure map `Cofix → F Cofix`
We also show that the composition of qpfs is a qpf, and that the quotient of a qpf
is a qpf.
The present theory focuses on the univariate case for qpfs
## References
* [Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon, *Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial
Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u
/-- Quotients of polynomial functors.
Roughly speaking, saying that `F` is a quotient of a polynomial functor means that for each `α`,
elements of `F α` are represented by pairs `⟨a, f⟩`, where `a` is the shape of the object and
`f` indexes the relevant elements of `α`, in a suitably natural manner.
-/
class QPF (F : Type u → Type u) [Functor F] where
P : PFunctor.{u}
abs : ∀ {α}, P α → F α
repr : ∀ {α}, F α → P α
abs_repr : ∀ {α} (x : F α), abs (repr x) = x
abs_map : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β) (p : P α), abs (P.map f p) = f <$> abs p
#align qpf QPF
namespace QPF
variable {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : QPF F]
open Functor (Liftp Liftr)
/-
Show that every qpf is a lawful functor.
Note: every functor has a field, `map_const`, and `lawfulFunctor` has the defining
characterization. We can only propagate the assumption.
-/
theorem id_map {α : Type _} (x : F α) : id <$> x = x := by
rw [← abs_repr x]
cases' repr x with a f
rw [← abs_map]
rfl
#align qpf.id_map QPF.id_map
theorem comp_map {α β γ : Type _} (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x : F α) :
(g ∘ f) <$> x = g <$> f <$> x := by
rw [← abs_repr x]
cases' repr x with a f
rw [← abs_map, ← abs_map, ← abs_map]
rfl
#align qpf.comp_map QPF.comp_map
theorem lawfulFunctor
(h : ∀ α β : Type u, @Functor.mapConst F _ α _ = Functor.map ∘ Function.const β) :
LawfulFunctor F :=
{ map_const := @h
id_map := @id_map F _ _
comp_map := @comp_map F _ _ }
#align qpf.is_lawful_functor QPF.lawfulFunctor
/-
Lifting predicates and relations
-/
section
open Functor
theorem liftp_iff {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (x : F α) :
Liftp p x ↔ ∃ a f, x = abs ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ ∀ i, p (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
cases' h : repr y with a f
use a, fun i => (f i).val
constructor
· rw [← hy, ← abs_repr y, h, ← abs_map]
rfl
intro i
apply (f i).property
rintro ⟨a, f, h₀, h₁⟩
use abs ⟨a, fun i => ⟨f i, h₁ i⟩⟩
rw [← abs_map, h₀]; rfl
#align qpf.liftp_iff QPF.liftp_iff
theorem liftp_iff' {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (x : F α) :
Liftp p x ↔ ∃ u : q.P α, abs u = x ∧ ∀ i, p (u.snd i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
cases' h : repr y with a f
use ⟨a, fun i => (f i).val⟩
dsimp
constructor
· rw [← hy, ← abs_repr y, h, ← abs_map]
rfl
intro i
apply (f i).property
rintro ⟨⟨a, f⟩, h₀, h₁⟩; dsimp at *
use abs ⟨a, fun i => ⟨f i, h₁ i⟩⟩
rw [← abs_map, ← h₀]; rfl
#align qpf.liftp_iff' QPF.liftp_iff'
theorem liftr_iff {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (x y : F α) :
Liftr r x y ↔ ∃ a f₀ f₁, x = abs ⟨a, f₀⟩ ∧ y = abs ⟨a, f₁⟩ ∧ ∀ i, r (f₀ i) (f₁ i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, xeq, yeq⟩
cases' h : repr u with a f
use a, fun i => (f i).val.fst, fun i => (f i).val.snd
constructor
· rw [← xeq, ← abs_repr u, h, ← abs_map]
rfl
constructor
· rw [← yeq, ← abs_repr u, h, ← abs_map]
rfl
intro i
exact (f i).property
rintro ⟨a, f₀, f₁, xeq, yeq, h⟩
use abs ⟨a, fun i => ⟨(f₀ i, f₁ i), h i⟩⟩
constructor
· rw [xeq, ← abs_map]
rfl
rw [yeq, ← abs_map]; rfl
#align qpf.liftr_iff QPF.liftr_iff
end
/-
Think of trees in the `W` type corresponding to `P` as representatives of elements of the
least fixed point of `F`, and assign a canonical representative to each equivalence class
of trees.
-/
/-- does recursion on `q.P.W` using `g : F α → α` rather than `g : P α → α` -/
def recF {α : Type _} (g : F α → α) : q.P.W → α
| ⟨a, f⟩ => g (abs ⟨a, fun x => recF g (f x)⟩)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align qpf.recF QPF.recF
theorem recF_eq {α : Type _} (g : F α → α) (x : q.P.W) :
recF g x = g (abs (q.P.map (recF g) x.dest)) := by
cases x
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align qpf.recF_eq QPF.recF_eq
theorem recF_eq' {α : Type _} (g : F α → α) (a : q.P.A) (f : q.P.B a → q.P.W) :
recF g ⟨a, f⟩ = g (abs (q.P.map (recF g) ⟨a, f⟩)) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align qpf.recF_eq' QPF.recF_eq'
/-- two trees are equivalent if their F-abstractions are -/
inductive Wequiv : q.P.W → q.P.W → Prop
| ind (a : q.P.A) (f f' : q.P.B a → q.P.W) : (∀ x, Wequiv (f x) (f' x)) → Wequiv ⟨a, f⟩ ⟨a, f'⟩
| abs (a : q.P.A) (f : q.P.B a → q.P.W) (a' : q.P.A) (f' : q.P.B a' → q.P.W) :
abs ⟨a, f⟩ = abs ⟨a', f'⟩ → Wequiv ⟨a, f⟩ ⟨a', f'⟩
| trans (u v w : q.P.W) : Wequiv u v → Wequiv v w → Wequiv u w
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align qpf.Wequiv QPF.Wequiv
/-- `recF` is insensitive to the representation -/
theorem recF_eq_of_Wequiv {α : Type u} (u : F α → α) (x y : q.P.W) :
Wequiv x y → recF u x = recF u y := by
intro h
induction h with
| ind a f f' _ ih => simp only [recF_eq', PFunctor.map_eq, Function.comp, ih]
| abs a f a' f' h => simp only [recF_eq', abs_map, h]
| trans x y z _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => exact Eq.trans ih₁ ih₂
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align qpf.recF_eq_of_Wequiv QPF.recF_eq_of_Wequiv
theorem Wequiv.abs' (x y : q.P.W) (h : QPF.abs x.dest = QPF.abs y.dest) : Wequiv x y := by
cases x
cases y
apply Wequiv.abs
apply h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align qpf.Wequiv.abs' QPF.Wequiv.abs'
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Univariate/Basic.lean | 210 | 212 | theorem Wequiv.refl (x : q.P.W) : Wequiv x x := by |
cases' x with a f
exact Wequiv.abs a f a f rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.IsLocalHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic
#align_import topology.covering from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
/-!
# Covering Maps
This file defines covering maps.
## Main definitions
* `IsEvenlyCovered f x I`: A point `x` is evenly covered by `f : E → X` with fiber `I` if `I` is
discrete and there is a `Trivialization` of `f` at `x` with fiber `I`.
* `IsCoveringMap f`: A function `f : E → X` is a covering map if every point `x` is evenly
covered by `f` with fiber `f ⁻¹' {x}`. The fibers `f ⁻¹' {x}` must be discrete, but if `X` is
not connected, then the fibers `f ⁻¹' {x}` are not necessarily isomorphic. Also, `f` is not
assumed to be surjective, so the fibers are even allowed to be empty.
-/
open Bundle
variable {E X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace X] (f : E → X) (s : Set X)
/-- A point `x : X` is evenly covered by `f : E → X` if `x` has an evenly covered neighborhood. -/
def IsEvenlyCovered (x : X) (I : Type*) [TopologicalSpace I] :=
DiscreteTopology I ∧ ∃ t : Trivialization I f, x ∈ t.baseSet
#align is_evenly_covered IsEvenlyCovered
namespace IsEvenlyCovered
variable {f}
/-- If `x` is evenly covered by `f`, then we can construct a trivialization of `f` at `x`. -/
noncomputable def toTrivialization {x : X} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f x I) : Trivialization (f ⁻¹' {x}) f :=
(Classical.choose h.2).transFiberHomeomorph
((Classical.choose h.2).preimageSingletonHomeomorph (Classical.choose_spec h.2)).symm
#align is_evenly_covered.to_trivialization IsEvenlyCovered.toTrivialization
theorem mem_toTrivialization_baseSet {x : X} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f x I) : x ∈ h.toTrivialization.baseSet :=
Classical.choose_spec h.2
#align is_evenly_covered.mem_to_trivialization_base_set IsEvenlyCovered.mem_toTrivialization_baseSet
theorem toTrivialization_apply {x : E} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f (f x) I) : (h.toTrivialization x).2 = ⟨x, rfl⟩ :=
let e := Classical.choose h.2
let h := Classical.choose_spec h.2
let he := e.mk_proj_snd' h
Subtype.ext
((e.toPartialEquiv.eq_symm_apply (e.mem_source.mpr h)
(by rwa [he, e.mem_target, e.coe_fst (e.mem_source.mpr h)])).mpr
he.symm).symm
#align is_evenly_covered.to_trivialization_apply IsEvenlyCovered.toTrivialization_apply
protected theorem continuousAt {x : E} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f (f x) I) : ContinuousAt f x :=
let e := h.toTrivialization
e.continuousAt_proj (e.mem_source.mpr (mem_toTrivialization_baseSet h))
#align is_evenly_covered.continuous_at IsEvenlyCovered.continuousAt
theorem to_isEvenlyCovered_preimage {x : X} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f x I) : IsEvenlyCovered f x (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := h
⟨((Classical.choose h2).preimageSingletonHomeomorph
(Classical.choose_spec h2)).embedding.discreteTopology,
_, h.mem_toTrivialization_baseSet⟩
#align is_evenly_covered.to_is_evenly_covered_preimage IsEvenlyCovered.to_isEvenlyCovered_preimage
end IsEvenlyCovered
/-- A covering map is a continuous function `f : E → X` with discrete fibers such that each point
of `X` has an evenly covered neighborhood. -/
def IsCoveringMapOn :=
∀ x ∈ s, IsEvenlyCovered f x (f ⁻¹' {x})
#align is_covering_map_on IsCoveringMapOn
namespace IsCoveringMapOn
theorem mk (F : X → Type*) [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (F x)] [hF : ∀ x, DiscreteTopology (F x)]
(e : ∀ x ∈ s, Trivialization (F x) f) (h : ∀ (x : X) (hx : x ∈ s), x ∈ (e x hx).baseSet) :
IsCoveringMapOn f s := fun x hx =>
IsEvenlyCovered.to_isEvenlyCovered_preimage ⟨hF x, e x hx, h x hx⟩
#align is_covering_map_on.mk IsCoveringMapOn.mk
variable {f} {s}
protected theorem continuousAt (hf : IsCoveringMapOn f s) {x : E} (hx : f x ∈ s) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
(hf (f x) hx).continuousAt
#align is_covering_map_on.continuous_at IsCoveringMapOn.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousOn (hf : IsCoveringMapOn f s) : ContinuousOn f (f ⁻¹' s) :=
ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun _ => hf.continuousAt
#align is_covering_map_on.continuous_on IsCoveringMapOn.continuousOn
protected theorem isLocalHomeomorphOn (hf : IsCoveringMapOn f s) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f (f ⁻¹' s) := by
refine IsLocalHomeomorphOn.mk f (f ⁻¹' s) fun x hx => ?_
let e := (hf (f x) hx).toTrivialization
have h := (hf (f x) hx).mem_toTrivialization_baseSet
let he := e.mem_source.2 h
refine
⟨e.toPartialHomeomorph.trans
{ toFun := fun p => p.1
invFun := fun p => ⟨p, x, rfl⟩
source := e.baseSet ×ˢ ({⟨x, rfl⟩} : Set (f ⁻¹' {f x}))
target := e.baseSet
open_source :=
e.open_baseSet.prod (singletons_open_iff_discrete.2 (hf (f x) hx).1 ⟨x, rfl⟩)
open_target := e.open_baseSet
map_source' := fun p => And.left
map_target' := fun p hp => ⟨hp, rfl⟩
left_inv' := fun p hp => Prod.ext rfl hp.2.symm
right_inv' := fun p _ => rfl
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_fst.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const).continuousOn },
⟨he, by rwa [e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm_symm, e.proj_toFun x he],
(hf (f x) hx).toTrivialization_apply⟩,
fun p h => (e.proj_toFun p h.1).symm⟩
#align is_covering_map_on.is_locally_homeomorph_on IsCoveringMapOn.isLocalHomeomorphOn
end IsCoveringMapOn
/-- A covering map is a continuous function `f : E → X` with discrete fibers such that each point
of `X` has an evenly covered neighborhood. -/
def IsCoveringMap :=
∀ x, IsEvenlyCovered f x (f ⁻¹' {x})
#align is_covering_map IsCoveringMap
variable {f}
| Mathlib/Topology/Covering.lean | 140 | 141 | theorem isCoveringMap_iff_isCoveringMapOn_univ : IsCoveringMap f ↔ IsCoveringMapOn f Set.univ := by |
simp only [IsCoveringMap, IsCoveringMapOn, Set.mem_univ, forall_true_left]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.variables from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Degrees of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the degree of a multivariate polynomial.
The *degree set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Multiset` containing, for each $x$ in the
variable set, $n$ copies of $x$, where $n$ is the maximum number of copies of $x$ appearing in a
monomial of $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.degrees p` : the multiset of variables representing the union of the multisets
corresponding to each non-zero monomial in `p`.
For example if `7 ≠ 0` in `R` and `p = x²y+7y³` then `degrees p = {x, x, y, y, y}`
* `MvPolynomial.degreeOf n p : ℕ` : the total degree of `p` with respect to the variable `n`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `degreeOf y p = 1`.
* `MvPolynomial.totalDegree p : ℕ` :
the max of the sizes of the multisets `s` whose monomials `X^s` occur in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `totalDegree p = 5`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Degrees
/-! ### `degrees` -/
/-- The maximal degrees of each variable in a multi-variable polynomial, expressed as a multiset.
(For example, `degrees (x^2 * y + y^3)` would be `{x, x, y, y, y}`.)
-/
def degrees (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Multiset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => toMultiset s
#align mv_polynomial.degrees MvPolynomial.degrees
theorem degrees_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degrees = p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => Finsupp.toMultiset s := by rw [degrees]; convert rfl
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_def MvPolynomial.degrees_def
theorem degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ toMultiset s := by
classical
refine (supDegree_single s a).trans_le ?_
split_ifs
exacts [bot_le, le_rfl]
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_monomial MvPolynomial.degrees_monomial
theorem degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = toMultiset s := by
classical
exact (supDegree_single s a).trans (if_neg ha)
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_monomial_eq MvPolynomial.degrees_monomial_eq
theorem degrees_C (a : R) : degrees (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
Multiset.le_zero.1 <| degrees_monomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_C MvPolynomial.degrees_C
theorem degrees_X' (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) <| le_of_eq <| toMultiset_single _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_X' MvPolynomial.degrees_X'
@[simp]
theorem degrees_X [Nontrivial R] (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) = {n} :=
(degrees_monomial_eq _ (1 : R) one_ne_zero).trans (toMultiset_single _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_X MvPolynomial.degrees_X
@[simp]
theorem degrees_zero : degrees (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
rw [← C_0]
exact degrees_C 0
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_zero MvPolynomial.degrees_zero
@[simp]
theorem degrees_one : degrees (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
degrees_C 1
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_one MvPolynomial.degrees_one
theorem degrees_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_add_le
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_add MvPolynomial.degrees_add
theorem degrees_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ s.sup fun i => (f i).degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_sum_le
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_sum MvPolynomial.degrees_sum
theorem degrees_mul (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees := by
classical
simp_rw [degrees_def]
exact supDegree_mul_le (map_add _)
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_mul MvPolynomial.degrees_mul
theorem degrees_prod {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degrees := by
classical exact supDegree_prod_le (map_zero _) (map_add _)
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_prod MvPolynomial.degrees_prod
theorem degrees_pow (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).degrees ≤ n • p.degrees := by
simpa using degrees_prod (Finset.range n) fun _ ↦ p
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_pow MvPolynomial.degrees_pow
theorem mem_degrees {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {i : σ} :
i ∈ p.degrees ↔ ∃ d, p.coeff d ≠ 0 ∧ i ∈ d.support := by
classical
simp only [degrees_def, Multiset.mem_sup, ← mem_support_iff, Finsupp.mem_toMultiset, exists_prop]
#align mv_polynomial.mem_degrees MvPolynomial.mem_degrees
theorem le_degrees_add {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p.degrees.Disjoint q.degrees) :
p.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
classical
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [Multiset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [toMultiset_zero]; apply Multiset.zero_le
· refine Finset.le_sup_of_le (b := d) ?_ le_rfl
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_add]
suffices q.coeff d = 0 by rwa [this, add_zero, coeff, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
rw [Ne, ← Finsupp.support_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h0
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0
contrapose! h
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
refine ⟨j, ?_, j, ?_, rfl⟩
all_goals rw [mem_degrees]; refine ⟨d, ?_, hj⟩; assumption
#align mv_polynomial.le_degrees_add MvPolynomial.le_degrees_add
theorem degrees_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
(h : Multiset.Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : (p + q).degrees = p.degrees ∪ q.degrees := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply degrees_add
· apply Multiset.union_le
· apply le_degrees_add h
· rw [add_comm]
apply le_degrees_add h.symm
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_add_of_disjoint MvPolynomial.degrees_add_of_disjoint
theorem degrees_map [CommSemiring S] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (f : R →+* S) :
(map f p).degrees ⊆ p.degrees := by
classical
dsimp only [degrees]
apply Multiset.subset_of_le
apply Finset.sup_mono
apply MvPolynomial.support_map_subset
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_map MvPolynomial.degrees_map
theorem degrees_rename (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(rename f φ).degrees ⊆ φ.degrees.map f := by
classical
intro i
rw [mem_degrees, Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨d, hd, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩ := coeff_rename_ne_zero _ _ _ hd
simp only [Finsupp.mapDomain, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at hi
rw [sum_apply, Finsupp.sum] at hi
contrapose! hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro j hj
simp only [exists_prop, mem_degrees] at hi
specialize hi j ⟨x, hx, hj⟩
rw [Finsupp.single_apply, if_neg hi]
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_rename MvPolynomial.degrees_rename
theorem degrees_map_of_injective [CommSemiring S] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Injective f) : (map f p).degrees = p.degrees := by
simp only [degrees, MvPolynomial.support_map_of_injective _ hf]
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_map_of_injective MvPolynomial.degrees_map_of_injective
theorem degrees_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f) :
degrees (rename f p) = (degrees p).map f := by
classical
simp only [degrees, Multiset.map_finset_sup p.support Finsupp.toMultiset f h,
support_rename_of_injective h, Finset.sup_image]
refine Finset.sup_congr rfl fun x _ => ?_
exact (Finsupp.toMultiset_map _ _).symm
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_rename_of_injective MvPolynomial.degrees_rename_of_injective
end Degrees
section DegreeOf
/-! ### `degreeOf` -/
/-- `degreeOf n p` gives the highest power of X_n that appears in `p` -/
def degreeOf (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.count n
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of MvPolynomial.degreeOf
theorem degreeOf_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degreeOf n = p.degrees.count n := by rw [degreeOf]; convert rfl
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_def MvPolynomial.degreeOf_def
theorem degreeOf_eq_sup (n : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n f = f.support.sup fun m => m n := by
classical
rw [degreeOf_def, degrees, Multiset.count_finset_sup]
congr
ext
simp
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_eq_sup MvPolynomial.degreeOf_eq_sup
theorem degreeOf_lt_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} (h : 0 < d) :
degreeOf n f < d ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m ∈ f.support → m n < d := by
rwa [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_lt_iff MvPolynomial.degreeOf_lt_iff
lemma degreeOf_le_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} :
degreeOf n f ≤ d ↔ ∀ m ∈ support f, m n ≤ d := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_zero (n : σ) : degreeOf n (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp only [degreeOf_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.count_zero]
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_zero MvPolynomial.degreeOf_zero
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_C (a : R) (x : σ) : degreeOf x (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp [degreeOf_def, degrees_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_C MvPolynomial.degreeOf_C
theorem degreeOf_X [DecidableEq σ] (i j : σ) [Nontrivial R] :
degreeOf i (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
classical
by_cases c : i = j
· simp only [c, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, degreeOf_def, degrees_X, Multiset.count_singleton]
simp [c, if_false, degreeOf_def, degrees_X]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_X MvPolynomial.degreeOf_X
theorem degreeOf_add_le (n : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n (f + g) ≤ max (degreeOf n f) (degreeOf n g) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]; exact supDegree_add_le
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_add_le MvPolynomial.degreeOf_add_le
theorem monomial_le_degreeOf (i : σ) {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} (h_m : m ∈ f.support) :
m i ≤ degreeOf i f := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup i]
apply Finset.le_sup h_m
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_le_degree_of MvPolynomial.monomial_le_degreeOf
-- TODO we can prove equality here if R is a domain
theorem degreeOf_mul_le (i : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (f * g) ≤ degreeOf i f + degreeOf i g := by
classical
repeat' rw [degreeOf]
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i (degrees_mul f g)
rw [Multiset.count_add]
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_mul_le MvPolynomial.degreeOf_mul_le
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_ne {i j : σ} (f : MvPolynomial σ R) (h : i ≠ j) :
degreeOf i (f * X j) = degreeOf i f := by
classical
repeat' rw [degreeOf_eq_sup (R := R) i]
rw [support_mul_X]
simp only [Finset.sup_map]
congr
ext
simp only [Finsupp.single, Nat.one_ne_zero, add_right_eq_self, addRightEmbedding_apply, coe_mk,
Pi.add_apply, comp_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.single_eq_of_ne h]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_mul_X_ne MvPolynomial.degreeOf_mul_X_ne
-- TODO in the following we have equality iff f ≠ 0
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_eq (j : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf j (f * X j) ≤ degreeOf j f + 1 := by
classical
repeat' rw [degreeOf]
apply (Multiset.count_le_of_le j (degrees_mul f (X j))).trans
simp only [Multiset.count_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le j (degrees_X' (R := R) j)
rw [Multiset.count_singleton_self]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_mul_X_eq MvPolynomial.degreeOf_mul_X_eq
theorem degreeOf_C_mul_le (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) (c : R) :
(C c * p).degreeOf i ≤ p.degreeOf i := by
unfold degreeOf
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i <| degrees_mul (C c) p
simp [degrees_C]
theorem degreeOf_mul_C_le (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) (c : R) :
(p * C c).degreeOf i ≤ p.degreeOf i := by
unfold degreeOf
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i <| degrees_mul p (C c)
simp [degrees_C]
theorem degreeOf_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f)
(i : σ) : degreeOf (f i) (rename f p) = degreeOf i p := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf, degrees_rename_of_injective h, Multiset.count_map_eq_count' f p.degrees h]
#align mv_polynomial.degree_of_rename_of_injective MvPolynomial.degreeOf_rename_of_injective
end DegreeOf
section TotalDegree
/-! ### `totalDegree` -/
/-- `totalDegree p` gives the maximum |s| over the monomials X^s in `p` -/
def totalDegree (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : ℕ :=
p.support.sup fun s => s.sum fun _ e => e
#align mv_polynomial.total_degree MvPolynomial.totalDegree
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Degrees.lean | 358 | 362 | theorem totalDegree_eq (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.totalDegree = p.support.sup fun m => Multiset.card (toMultiset m) := by |
rw [totalDegree]
congr; funext m
exact (Finsupp.card_toMultiset _).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.inverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open Set Filter
open Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
#align real.arcsin Real.arcsin
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arcsin_mem_Icc Real.arcsin_mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
#align real.range_arcsin Real.range_arcsin
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
#align real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
#align real.arcsin_proj_Icc Real.arcsin_projIcc
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
#align real.sin_arcsin' Real.sin_arcsin'
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.sin_arcsin Real.sin_arcsin
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
#align real.arcsin_sin' Real.arcsin_sin'
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_sin Real.arcsin_sin
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
#align real.strict_mono_on_arcsin Real.strictMonoOn_arcsin
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
#align real.monotone_arcsin Real.monotone_arcsin
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
#align real.inj_on_arcsin Real.injOn_arcsin
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_inj Real.arcsin_inj
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align real.continuous_arcsin Real.continuous_arcsin
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
#align real.continuous_at_arcsin Real.continuousAt_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
#align real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq Real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
#align real.arcsin_zero Real.arcsin_zero
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_one Real.arcsin_one
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_one_le Real.arcsin_of_one_le
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_neg_one Real.arcsin_neg_one
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one Real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
#align real.arcsin_neg Real.arcsin_neg
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
cases' lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin'
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
#align real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le Real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
#align real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' Real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le'
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
#align real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin Real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
#align real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' Real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin'
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
#align real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt Real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
#align real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' Real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt'
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
#align real.arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin Real.arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
#align real.arcsin_nonneg Real.arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
#align real.arcsin_nonpos Real.arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
#align real.arcsin_eq_zero_iff Real.arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
#align real.zero_eq_arcsin_iff Real.zero_eq_arcsin_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
#align real.arcsin_pos Real.arcsin_pos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
#align real.arcsin_lt_zero Real.arcsin_lt_zero
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
#align real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
#align real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
#align real.pi_div_two_eq_arcsin Real.pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
#align real.pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.pi_div_two_le_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
#align real.arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
#align real.arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
#align real.pi_div_four_le_arcsin Real.pi_div_four_le_arcsin
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
#align real.maps_to_sin_Ioo Real.mapsTo_sin_Ioo
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
#align real.sin_local_homeomorph Real.sinPartialHomeomorph
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
#align real.cos_arcsin_nonneg Real.cos_arcsin_nonneg
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 306 | 318 | theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by |
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.GaussSum
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.quadratic_reciprocity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
/-!
# Quadratic reciprocity.
## Main results
We prove the law of quadratic reciprocity, see `legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity` and
`legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity'`, as well as the
interpretations in terms of existence of square roots depending on the congruence mod 4,
`ZMod.exists_sq_eq_prime_iff_of_mod_four_eq_one` and
`ZMod.exists_sq_eq_prime_iff_of_mod_four_eq_three`.
We also prove the supplementary laws that give conditions for when `2` or `-2`
is a square modulo a prime `p`:
`legendreSym.at_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff` for `2` and
`legendreSym.at_neg_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff` for `-2`.
## Implementation notes
The proofs use results for quadratic characters on arbitrary finite fields
from `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.GaussSum`, which in turn are based on
properties of quadratic Gauss sums as provided by `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussSum`.
## Tags
quadratic residue, quadratic nonresidue, Legendre symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
open Nat
section Values
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
open ZMod
/-!
### The value of the Legendre symbol at `2` and `-2`
See `jacobiSym.at_two` and `jacobiSym.at_neg_two` for the corresponding statements
for the Jacobi symbol.
-/
namespace legendreSym
variable (hp : p ≠ 2)
/-- `legendreSym p 2` is given by `χ₈ p`. -/
theorem at_two : legendreSym p 2 = χ₈ p := by
have : (2 : ZMod p) = (2 : ℤ) := by norm_cast
rw [legendreSym, ← this, quadraticChar_two ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp), card p]
#align legendre_sym.at_two legendreSym.at_two
/-- `legendreSym p (-2)` is given by `χ₈' p`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/QuadraticReciprocity.lean | 66 | 68 | theorem at_neg_two : legendreSym p (-2) = χ₈' p := by |
have : (-2 : ZMod p) = (-2 : ℤ) := by norm_cast
rw [legendreSym, ← this, quadraticChar_neg_two ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp), card p]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Louis Carlin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Louis Carlin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
#align_import algebra.euclidean_domain.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ee7b9f9a9ac2a8d9f04ea39bbfe6b1a3be053b38"
/-!
# Euclidean domains
This file introduces Euclidean domains and provides the extended Euclidean algorithm. To be precise,
a slightly more general version is provided which is sometimes called a transfinite Euclidean domain
and differs in the fact that the degree function need not take values in `ℕ` but can take values in
any well-ordered set. Transfinite Euclidean domains were introduced by Motzkin and examples which
don't satisfy the classical notion were provided independently by Hiblot and Nagata.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanDomain`: Defines Euclidean domain with functions `quotient` and `remainder`. Instances
of `Div` and `Mod` are provided, so that one can write `a = b * (a / b) + a % b`.
* `gcd`: defines the greatest common divisors of two elements of a Euclidean domain.
* `xgcd`: given two elements `a b : R`, `xgcd a b` defines the pair `(x, y)` such that
`x * a + y * b = gcd a b`.
* `lcm`: defines the lowest common multiple of two elements `a` and `b` of a Euclidean domain as
`a * b / (gcd a b)`
## Main statements
See `Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic` for most of the theorems about Euclidean domains,
including Bézout's lemma.
See `Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Instances` for the fact that `ℤ` is a Euclidean domain,
as is any field.
## Notation
`≺` denotes the well founded relation on the Euclidean domain, e.g. in the example of the polynomial
ring over a field, `p ≺ q` for polynomials `p` and `q` if and only if the degree of `p` is less than
the degree of `q`.
## Implementation details
Instead of working with a valuation, `EuclideanDomain` is implemented with the existence of a well
founded relation `r` on the integral domain `R`, which in the example of `ℤ` would correspond to
setting `i ≺ j` for integers `i` and `j` if the absolute value of `i` is smaller than the absolute
value of `j`.
## References
* [Th. Motzkin, *The Euclidean algorithm*][MR32592]
* [J.-J. Hiblot, *Des anneaux euclidiens dont le plus petit algorithme n'est pas à valeurs finies*]
[MR399081]
* [M. Nagata, *On Euclid algorithm*][MR541021]
## Tags
Euclidean domain, transfinite Euclidean domain, Bézout's lemma
-/
universe u
/-- A `EuclideanDomain` is a non-trivial commutative ring with a division and a remainder,
satisfying `b * (a / b) + a % b = a`.
The definition of a Euclidean domain usually includes a valuation function `R → ℕ`.
This definition is slightly generalised to include a well founded relation
`r` with the property that `r (a % b) b`, instead of a valuation. -/
class EuclideanDomain (R : Type u) extends CommRing R, Nontrivial R where
/-- A division function (denoted `/`) on `R`.
This satisfies the property `b * (a / b) + a % b = a`, where `%` denotes `remainder`. -/
protected quotient : R → R → R
/-- Division by zero should always give zero by convention. -/
protected quotient_zero : ∀ a, quotient a 0 = 0
/-- A remainder function (denoted `%`) on `R`.
This satisfies the property `b * (a / b) + a % b = a`, where `/` denotes `quotient`. -/
protected remainder : R → R → R
/-- The property that links the quotient and remainder functions.
This allows us to compute GCDs and LCMs. -/
protected quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq : ∀ a b, b * quotient a b + remainder a b = a
/-- A well-founded relation on `R`, satisfying `r (a % b) b`.
This ensures that the GCD algorithm always terminates. -/
protected r : R → R → Prop
/-- The relation `r` must be well-founded.
This ensures that the GCD algorithm always terminates. -/
r_wellFounded : WellFounded r
/-- The relation `r` satisfies `r (a % b) b`. -/
protected remainder_lt : ∀ (a) {b}, b ≠ 0 → r (remainder a b) b
/-- An additional constraint on `r`. -/
mul_left_not_lt : ∀ (a) {b}, b ≠ 0 → ¬r (a * b) a
#align euclidean_domain EuclideanDomain
#align euclidean_domain.quotient EuclideanDomain.quotient
#align euclidean_domain.quotient_zero EuclideanDomain.quotient_zero
#align euclidean_domain.remainder EuclideanDomain.remainder
#align euclidean_domain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq EuclideanDomain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq
#align euclidean_domain.r EuclideanDomain.r
#align euclidean_domain.r_well_founded EuclideanDomain.r_wellFounded
#align euclidean_domain.remainder_lt EuclideanDomain.remainder_lt
#align euclidean_domain.mul_left_not_lt EuclideanDomain.mul_left_not_lt
namespace EuclideanDomain
variable {R : Type u} [EuclideanDomain R]
/-- Abbreviated notation for the well-founded relation `r` in a Euclidean domain. -/
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => EuclideanDomain.r
local instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation R where
wf := r_wellFounded
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) : Div R :=
⟨EuclideanDomain.quotient⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) : Mod R :=
⟨EuclideanDomain.remainder⟩
theorem div_add_mod (a b : R) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
EuclideanDomain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq _ _
#align euclidean_domain.div_add_mod EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod
theorem mod_add_div (a b : R) : a % b + b * (a / b) = a :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (div_add_mod _ _)
#align euclidean_domain.mod_add_div EuclideanDomain.mod_add_div
theorem mod_add_div' (m k : R) : m % k + m / k * k = m := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mod_add_div _ _
#align euclidean_domain.mod_add_div' EuclideanDomain.mod_add_div'
theorem div_add_mod' (m k : R) : m / k * k + m % k = m := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact div_add_mod _ _
#align euclidean_domain.div_add_mod' EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod'
| Mathlib/Algebra/EuclideanDomain/Defs.lean | 141 | 144 | theorem mod_eq_sub_mul_div {R : Type*} [EuclideanDomain R] (a b : R) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
calc
a % b = b * (a / b) + a % b - b * (a / b) := (add_sub_cancel_left _ _).symm
_ = a - b * (a / b) := by | rw [div_add_mod]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
/-!
# Marginals of multivariate functions
In this file, we define a convenient way to compute integrals of multivariate functions, especially
if you want to write expressions where you integrate only over some of the variables that the
function depends on. This is common in induction arguments involving integrals of multivariate
functions.
This constructions allows working with iterated integrals and applying Tonelli's theorem
and Fubini's theorem, without using measurable equivalences by changing the representation of your
space (e.g. `((ι ⊕ ι') → ℝ) ≃ (ι → ℝ) × (ι' → ℝ)`).
## Main Definitions
* Assume that `∀ i : ι, π i` is a product of measurable spaces with measures `μ i` on `π i`,
`f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞` is a function and `s : Finset ι`.
Then `lmarginal μ s f` or `∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ` is the function that integrates `f`
over all variables in `s`. It returns a function that still takes the same variables as `f`,
but is constant in the variables in `s`. Mathematically, if `s = {i₁, ..., iₖ}`,
then `lmarginal μ s f` is the expression
$$
\vec{x}\mapsto \int\!\!\cdots\!\!\int f(\vec{x}[\vec{y}])dy_{i_1}\cdots dy_{i_k}.
$$
where $\vec{x}[\vec{y}]$ is the vector $\vec{x}$ with $x_{i_j}$ replaced by $y_{i_j}$ for all
$1 \le j \le k$.
If `f` is the distribution of a random variable, this is the marginal distribution of all
variables not in `s` (but not the most general notion, since we only consider product measures
here).
Note that the notation `∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ` is not a binder, and returns a function.
## Main Results
* `lmarginal_union` is the analogue of Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals. It states that
for measurable functions `f` and disjoint finsets `s` and `t` we have
`∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ`.
## Implementation notes
The function `f` can have an arbitrary product as its domain (even infinite products), but the
set `s` of integration variables is a `Finset`. We are assuming that the function `f` is measurable
for most of this file. Note that asking whether it is `AEMeasurable` is not even well-posed,
since there is no well-behaved measure on the domain of `f`.
## Todo
* Define the marginal function for functions taking values in a Banach space.
-/
open scoped Classical ENNReal
open Set Function Equiv Finset
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
section LMarginal
variable {δ δ' : Type*} {π : δ → Type*} [∀ x, MeasurableSpace (π x)]
variable {μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)} [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] [DecidableEq δ]
variable {s t : Finset δ} {f g : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞} {x y : ∀ i, π i} {i : δ}
/-- Integrate `f(x₁,…,xₙ)` over all variables `xᵢ` where `i ∈ s`. Return a function in the
remaining variables (it will be constant in the `xᵢ` for `i ∈ s`).
This is the marginal distribution of all variables not in `s` when the considered measure
is the product measure. -/
def lmarginal (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) (s : Finset δ) (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(x : ∀ i, π i) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⁻ y : ∀ i : s, π i, f (updateFinset x s y) ∂Measure.pi fun i : s => μ i
-- Note: this notation is not a binder. This is more convenient since it returns a function.
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f " ∂" μ:70 => lmarginal μ s f
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f => lmarginal (fun _ ↦ volume) s f
variable (μ)
theorem _root_.Measurable.lmarginal (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) := by
refine Measurable.lintegral_prod_right ?_
refine hf.comp ?_
rw [measurable_pi_iff]; intro i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· simp [hi, updateFinset]
exact measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_snd _
· simp [hi, updateFinset]
exact measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_fst _
@[simp] theorem lmarginal_empty (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⋯∫⁻_∅, f ∂μ = f := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [lmarginal, Measure.pi_of_empty fun i : (∅ : Finset δ) => μ i]
apply lintegral_dirac'
exact Subsingleton.measurable
/-- The marginal distribution is independent of the variables in `s`. -/
theorem lmarginal_congr {x y : ∀ i, π i} (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ i ∉ s, x i = y i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) y := by
dsimp [lmarginal, updateFinset_def]; rcongr; exact h _ ‹_›
theorem lmarginal_update_of_mem {i : δ} (hi : i ∈ s)
(f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, π i) (y : π i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) (Function.update x i y) = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x := by
apply lmarginal_congr
intro j hj
have : j ≠ i := by rintro rfl; exact hj hi
apply update_noteq this
theorem lmarginal_union (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f)
(hst : Disjoint s t) : ∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ := by
ext1 x
let e := MeasurableEquiv.piFinsetUnion π hst
calc (∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ) x
= ∫⁻ (y : (i : ↥(s ∪ t)) → π i), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) y)
∂.pi fun i' : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ μ i' := rfl
_ = ∫⁻ (y : ((i : s) → π i) × ((j : t) → π j)), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) _)
∂(Measure.pi fun i : s ↦ μ i).prod (.pi fun j : t ↦ μ j) := by
rw [measurePreserving_piFinsetUnion hst μ |>.lintegral_map_equiv]
_ = ∫⁻ (y : (i : s) → π i), ∫⁻ (z : (j : t) → π j), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) (e (y, z)))
∂.pi fun j : t ↦ μ j ∂.pi fun i : s ↦ μ i := by
apply lintegral_prod
apply Measurable.aemeasurable
exact hf.comp <| measurable_updateFinset.comp e.measurable
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ) x := by
simp_rw [lmarginal, updateFinset_updateFinset hst]
rfl
theorem lmarginal_union' (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {s t : Finset δ}
(hst : Disjoint s t) : ∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_t, ∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ ∂μ := by
rw [Finset.union_comm, lmarginal_union μ f hf hst.symm]
variable {μ}
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem lmarginal_singleton (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (i : δ) :
∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ = fun x => ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by
let α : Type _ := ({i} : Finset δ)
let e := (MeasurableEquiv.piUnique fun j : α ↦ π j).symm
ext1 x
calc (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x
= ∫⁻ (y : π (default : α)), f (updateFinset x {i} (e y)) ∂μ (default : α) := by
simp_rw [lmarginal, measurePreserving_piUnique (fun j : ({i} : Finset δ) ↦ μ j) |>.symm _
|>.lintegral_map_equiv]
_ = ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by simp [update_eq_updateFinset]; rfl
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the beginning (compare with
`lmarginal_insert'`, which peels off an integral at the end). -/
theorem lmarginal_insert (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∉ s) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) x = ∫⁻ xᵢ, (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by
rw [Finset.insert_eq, lmarginal_union μ f hf (Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr hi),
lmarginal_singleton]
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the beginning (compare with
`lmarginal_erase'`, which peels off an integral at the end). -/
theorem lmarginal_erase (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∈ s) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x = ∫⁻ xᵢ, (∫⋯∫⁻_(erase s i), f ∂μ) (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by
simpa [insert_erase hi] using lmarginal_insert _ hf (not_mem_erase i s) x
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the end (compare with
`lmarginal_insert`, which peels off an integral at the beginning). -/
theorem lmarginal_insert' (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∉ s) :
∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, (fun x ↦ ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ∂μ := by
rw [Finset.insert_eq, Finset.union_comm,
lmarginal_union (s := s) μ f hf (Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr hi), lmarginal_singleton]
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the end (compare with
`lmarginal_erase`, which peels off an integral at the beginning). -/
theorem lmarginal_erase' (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∈ s) :
∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_(erase s i), (fun x ↦ ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ∂μ := by
simpa [insert_erase hi] using lmarginal_insert' _ hf (not_mem_erase i s)
open Filter
@[gcongr]
theorem lmarginal_mono {f g : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ ≤ ∫⋯∫⁻_s, g ∂μ :=
fun _ => lintegral_mono fun _ => hfg _
@[simp] theorem lmarginal_univ [Fintype δ] {f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞} :
∫⋯∫⁻_univ, f ∂μ = fun _ => ∫⁻ x, f x ∂Measure.pi μ := by
let e : { j // j ∈ Finset.univ } ≃ δ := Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv mem_univ
ext1 x
simp_rw [lmarginal, measurePreserving_piCongrLeft μ e |>.lintegral_map_equiv, updateFinset_def]
simp
rfl
theorem lintegral_eq_lmarginal_univ [Fintype δ] {f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞} (x : ∀ i, π i) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂Measure.pi μ = (∫⋯∫⁻_univ, f ∂μ) x := by simp
theorem lmarginal_image [DecidableEq δ'] {e : δ' → δ} (he : Injective e) (s : Finset δ')
{f : (∀ i, π (e i)) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s.image e, f ∘ (· ∘' e) ∂μ) x = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ ∘' e) (x ∘' e) := by
have h : Measurable ((· ∘' e) : (∀ i, π i) → _) :=
measurable_pi_iff.mpr <| fun i ↦ measurable_pi_apply (e i)
induction s using Finset.induction generalizing x with
| empty => simp
| insert hi ih =>
rw [image_insert, lmarginal_insert _ (hf.comp h) (he.mem_finset_image.not.mpr hi),
lmarginal_insert _ hf hi]
simp_rw [ih, ← update_comp_eq_of_injective' x he]
theorem lmarginal_update_of_not_mem {i : δ}
{f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hi : i ∉ s) (x : ∀ i, π i) (y : π i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) (Function.update x i y) = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∘ (Function.update · i y) ∂μ) x := by
induction s using Finset.induction generalizing x with
| empty => simp
| @insert i' s hi' ih =>
rw [lmarginal_insert _ hf hi', lmarginal_insert _ (hf.comp measurable_update_left) hi']
have hii' : i ≠ i' := mt (by rintro rfl; exact mem_insert_self i s) hi
simp_rw [update_comm hii', ih (mt Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Marginal.lean | 224 | 228 | theorem lmarginal_eq_of_subset {f g : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (hfg : ∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, g ∂μ) :
∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_t, g ∂μ := by |
rw [← union_sdiff_of_subset hst, lmarginal_union' μ f hf disjoint_sdiff,
lmarginal_union' μ g hg disjoint_sdiff, hfg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Chris Hughes, Michael Howes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Semiconj.Units
#align_import algebra.group.conj from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0743cc5d9d86bcd1bba10f480e948a257d65056f"
/-!
# Conjugacy of group elements
See also `MulAut.conj` and `Quandle.conj`.
-/
-- TODO: After #13027,
-- assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists Multiset
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β]
/-- We say that `a` is conjugate to `b` if for some unit `c` we have `c * a * c⁻¹ = b`. -/
def IsConj (a b : α) :=
∃ c : αˣ, SemiconjBy (↑c) a b
#align is_conj IsConj
@[refl]
theorem IsConj.refl (a : α) : IsConj a a :=
⟨1, SemiconjBy.one_left a⟩
#align is_conj.refl IsConj.refl
@[symm]
theorem IsConj.symm {a b : α} : IsConj a b → IsConj b a
| ⟨c, hc⟩ => ⟨c⁻¹, hc.units_inv_symm_left⟩
#align is_conj.symm IsConj.symm
theorem isConj_comm {g h : α} : IsConj g h ↔ IsConj h g :=
⟨IsConj.symm, IsConj.symm⟩
#align is_conj_comm isConj_comm
@[trans]
theorem IsConj.trans {a b c : α} : IsConj a b → IsConj b c → IsConj a c
| ⟨c₁, hc₁⟩, ⟨c₂, hc₂⟩ => ⟨c₂ * c₁, hc₂.mul_left hc₁⟩
#align is_conj.trans IsConj.trans
@[simp]
theorem isConj_iff_eq {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} : IsConj a b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => by
rw [SemiconjBy, mul_comm, ← Units.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_assoc, c.mul_inv, mul_one] at hc
exact hc, fun h => by rw [h]⟩
#align is_conj_iff_eq isConj_iff_eq
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_isConj (f : α →* β) {a b : α} : IsConj a b → IsConj (f a) (f b)
| ⟨c, hc⟩ => ⟨Units.map f c, by rw [Units.coe_map, SemiconjBy, ← f.map_mul, hc.eq, f.map_mul]⟩
#align monoid_hom.map_is_conj MonoidHom.map_isConj
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [CancelMonoid α]
-- These lemmas hold for `RightCancelMonoid` with the current proofs, but for the sake of
-- not duplicating code (these lemmas also hold for `LeftCancelMonoids`) we leave these
-- not generalised.
@[simp]
theorem isConj_one_right {a : α} : IsConj 1 a ↔ a = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => mul_right_cancel (hc.symm.trans ((mul_one _).trans (one_mul _).symm)), fun h => by
rw [h]⟩
#align is_conj_one_right isConj_one_right
@[simp]
theorem isConj_one_left {a : α} : IsConj a 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
calc
IsConj a 1 ↔ IsConj 1 a := ⟨IsConj.symm, IsConj.symm⟩
_ ↔ a = 1 := isConj_one_right
#align is_conj_one_left isConj_one_left
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group α]
@[simp]
theorem isConj_iff {a b : α} : IsConj a b ↔ ∃ c : α, c * a * c⁻¹ = b :=
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => ⟨c, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 hc⟩, fun ⟨c, hc⟩ =>
⟨⟨c, c⁻¹, mul_inv_self c, inv_mul_self c⟩, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul.1 hc⟩⟩
#align is_conj_iff isConj_iff
-- Porting note: not in simp NF.
-- @[simp]
theorem conj_inv {a b : α} : (b * a * b⁻¹)⁻¹ = b * a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ :=
((MulAut.conj b).map_inv a).symm
#align conj_inv conj_inv
@[simp]
theorem conj_mul {a b c : α} : b * a * b⁻¹ * (b * c * b⁻¹) = b * (a * c) * b⁻¹ :=
((MulAut.conj b).map_mul a c).symm
#align conj_mul conj_mul
@[simp]
theorem conj_pow {i : ℕ} {a b : α} : (a * b * a⁻¹) ^ i = a * b ^ i * a⁻¹ := by
induction' i with i hi
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, hi]
#align conj_pow conj_pow
@[simp]
theorem conj_zpow {i : ℤ} {a b : α} : (a * b * a⁻¹) ^ i = a * b ^ i * a⁻¹ := by
induction' i
· change (a * b * a⁻¹) ^ (_ : ℤ) = a * b ^ (_ : ℤ) * a⁻¹
simp [zpow_natCast]
· simp only [zpow_negSucc, conj_pow, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
rw [mul_assoc]
-- Porting note: Added `change`, `zpow_natCast`, and `rw`.
#align conj_zpow conj_zpow
theorem conj_injective {x : α} : Function.Injective fun g : α => x * g * x⁻¹ :=
(MulAut.conj x).injective
#align conj_injective conj_injective
end Group
namespace IsConj
/- This small quotient API is largely copied from the API of `Associates`;
where possible, try to keep them in sync -/
/-- The setoid of the relation `IsConj` iff there is a unit `u` such that `u * x = y * u` -/
protected def setoid (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Setoid α where
r := IsConj
iseqv := ⟨IsConj.refl, IsConj.symm, IsConj.trans⟩
#align is_conj.setoid IsConj.setoid
end IsConj
attribute [local instance] IsConj.setoid
/-- The quotient type of conjugacy classes of a group. -/
def ConjClasses (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Type _ :=
Quotient (IsConj.setoid α)
#align conj_classes ConjClasses
namespace ConjClasses
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β]
/-- The canonical quotient map from a monoid `α` into the `ConjClasses` of `α` -/
protected def mk {α : Type*} [Monoid α] (a : α) : ConjClasses α := ⟦a⟧
#align conj_classes.mk ConjClasses.mk
instance : Inhabited (ConjClasses α) := ⟨⟦1⟧⟩
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff_isConj {a b : α} : ConjClasses.mk a = ConjClasses.mk b ↔ IsConj a b :=
Iff.intro Quotient.exact Quot.sound
#align conj_classes.mk_eq_mk_iff_is_conj ConjClasses.mk_eq_mk_iff_isConj
theorem quotient_mk_eq_mk (a : α) : ⟦a⟧ = ConjClasses.mk a :=
rfl
#align conj_classes.quotient_mk_eq_mk ConjClasses.quotient_mk_eq_mk
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk (a : α) : Quot.mk Setoid.r a = ConjClasses.mk a :=
rfl
#align conj_classes.quot_mk_eq_mk ConjClasses.quot_mk_eq_mk
theorem forall_isConj {p : ConjClasses α → Prop} : (∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, p (ConjClasses.mk a) :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ => h _) fun h a => Quotient.inductionOn a h
#align conj_classes.forall_is_conj ConjClasses.forall_isConj
theorem mk_surjective : Function.Surjective (@ConjClasses.mk α _) :=
forall_isConj.2 fun a => ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align conj_classes.mk_surjective ConjClasses.mk_surjective
instance : One (ConjClasses α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
theorem one_eq_mk_one : (1 : ConjClasses α) = ConjClasses.mk 1 :=
rfl
#align conj_classes.one_eq_mk_one ConjClasses.one_eq_mk_one
theorem exists_rep (a : ConjClasses α) : ∃ a0 : α, ConjClasses.mk a0 = a :=
Quot.exists_rep a
#align conj_classes.exists_rep ConjClasses.exists_rep
/-- A `MonoidHom` maps conjugacy classes of one group to conjugacy classes of another. -/
def map (f : α →* β) : ConjClasses α → ConjClasses β :=
Quotient.lift (ConjClasses.mk ∘ f) fun _ _ ab => mk_eq_mk_iff_isConj.2 (f.map_isConj ab)
#align conj_classes.map ConjClasses.map
theorem map_surjective {f : α →* β} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (ConjClasses.map f) := by
intro b
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := ConjClasses.mk_surjective b
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hf b
exact ⟨ConjClasses.mk a, rfl⟩
#align conj_classes.map_surjective ConjClasses.map_surjective
-- Porting note: This has not been adapted to mathlib4, is it still accurate?
library_note "slow-failing instance priority"/--
Certain instances trigger further searches when they are considered as candidate instances;
these instances should be assigned a priority lower than the default of 1000 (for example, 900).
The conditions for this rule are as follows:
* a class `C` has instances `instT : C T` and `instT' : C T'`
* types `T` and `T'` are both specializations of another type `S`
* the parameters supplied to `S` to produce `T` are not (fully) determined by `instT`,
instead they have to be found by instance search
If those conditions hold, the instance `instT` should be assigned lower priority.
For example, suppose the search for an instance of `DecidableEq (Multiset α)` tries the
candidate instance `Con.quotient.decidableEq (c : Con M) : decidableEq c.quotient`.
Since `Multiset` and `Con.quotient` are both quotient types, unification will check
that the relations `List.perm` and `c.toSetoid.r` unify. However, `c.toSetoid` depends on
a `Mul M` instance, so this unification triggers a search for `Mul (List α)`;
this will traverse all subclasses of `Mul` before failing.
On the other hand, the search for an instance of `DecidableEq (Con.quotient c)` for `c : Con M`
can quickly reject the candidate instance `Multiset.decidableEq` because the type of
`List.perm : List ?m_1 → List ?m_1 → Prop` does not unify with `M → M → Prop`.
Therefore, we should assign `Con.quotient.decidableEq` a lower priority because it fails slowly.
(In terms of the rules above, `C := DecidableEq`, `T := Con.quotient`,
`instT := Con.quotient.decidableEq`, `T' := Multiset`, `instT' := Multiset.decidableEq`,
and `S := Quot`.)
If the type involved is a free variable (rather than an instantiation of some type `S`),
the instance priority should be even lower, see Note [lower instance priority].
-/
-- see Note [slow-failing instance priority]
instance (priority := 900) [DecidableRel (IsConj : α → α → Prop)] : DecidableEq (ConjClasses α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq <| Quotient (IsConj.setoid α)
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
theorem mk_injective : Function.Injective (@ConjClasses.mk α _) := fun _ _ =>
(mk_eq_mk_iff_isConj.trans isConj_iff_eq).1
#align conj_classes.mk_injective ConjClasses.mk_injective
theorem mk_bijective : Function.Bijective (@ConjClasses.mk α _) :=
⟨mk_injective, mk_surjective⟩
#align conj_classes.mk_bijective ConjClasses.mk_bijective
/-- The bijection between a `CommGroup` and its `ConjClasses`. -/
def mkEquiv : α ≃ ConjClasses α :=
⟨ConjClasses.mk, Quotient.lift id fun (a : α) b => isConj_iff_eq.1, Quotient.lift_mk _ _, by
rw [Function.RightInverse, Function.LeftInverse, forall_isConj]
intro x
rw [← quotient_mk_eq_mk, ← quotient_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.lift_mk, id]⟩
#align conj_classes.mk_equiv ConjClasses.mkEquiv
end CommMonoid
end ConjClasses
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α]
/-- Given an element `a`, `conjugatesOf a` is the set of conjugates. -/
def conjugatesOf (a : α) : Set α :=
{ b | IsConj a b }
#align conjugates_of conjugatesOf
theorem mem_conjugatesOf_self {a : α} : a ∈ conjugatesOf a :=
IsConj.refl _
#align mem_conjugates_of_self mem_conjugatesOf_self
theorem IsConj.conjugatesOf_eq {a b : α} (ab : IsConj a b) : conjugatesOf a = conjugatesOf b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨fun ag => ab.symm.trans ag, fun bg => ab.trans bg⟩
#align is_conj.conjugates_of_eq IsConj.conjugatesOf_eq
theorem isConj_iff_conjugatesOf_eq {a b : α} : IsConj a b ↔ conjugatesOf a = conjugatesOf b :=
⟨IsConj.conjugatesOf_eq, fun h => by
have ha := @mem_conjugatesOf_self _ _ b -- Porting note: added `@`.
rwa [← h] at ha⟩
#align is_conj_iff_conjugates_of_eq isConj_iff_conjugatesOf_eq
end Monoid
namespace ConjClasses
variable [Monoid α]
attribute [local instance] IsConj.setoid
/-- Given a conjugacy class `a`, `carrier a` is the set it represents. -/
def carrier : ConjClasses α → Set α :=
Quotient.lift conjugatesOf fun (_ : α) _ ab => IsConj.conjugatesOf_eq ab
#align conj_classes.carrier ConjClasses.carrier
theorem mem_carrier_mk {a : α} : a ∈ carrier (ConjClasses.mk a) :=
IsConj.refl _
#align conj_classes.mem_carrier_mk ConjClasses.mem_carrier_mk
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Conj.lean | 307 | 313 | theorem mem_carrier_iff_mk_eq {a : α} {b : ConjClasses α} :
a ∈ carrier b ↔ ConjClasses.mk a = b := by |
revert b
rw [forall_isConj]
intro b
rw [carrier, eq_comm, mk_eq_mk_iff_isConj, ← quotient_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.lift_mk]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Semantics
#align_import model_theory.definability from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Definable Sets
This file defines what it means for a set over a first-order structure to be definable.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.Definable` is defined so that `A.Definable L s` indicates that the
set `s` of a finite cartesian power of `M` is definable with parameters in `A`.
* `Set.Definable₁` is defined so that `A.Definable₁ L s` indicates that
`(s : Set M)` is definable with parameters in `A`.
* `Set.Definable₂` is defined so that `A.Definable₂ L s` indicates that
`(s : Set (M × M))` is definable with parameters in `A`.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.DefinableSet` is defined so that `L.DefinableSet A α` is the boolean
algebra of subsets of `α → M` defined by formulas with parameters in `A`.
## Main Results
* `L.DefinableSet A α` forms a `BooleanAlgebra`
* `Set.Definable.image_comp` shows that definability is closed under projections in finite
dimensions.
-/
universe u v w u₁
namespace Set
variable {M : Type w} (A : Set M) (L : FirstOrder.Language.{u, v}) [L.Structure M]
open FirstOrder FirstOrder.Language FirstOrder.Language.Structure
variable {α : Type u₁} {β : Type*}
/-- A subset of a finite Cartesian product of a structure is definable over a set `A` when
membership in the set is given by a first-order formula with parameters from `A`. -/
def Definable (s : Set (α → M)) : Prop :=
∃ φ : L[[A]].Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize
#align set.definable Set.Definable
variable {L} {A} {B : Set M} {s : Set (α → M)}
theorem Definable.map_expansion {L' : FirstOrder.Language} [L'.Structure M] (h : A.Definable L s)
(φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] : A.Definable L' s := by
obtain ⟨ψ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨(φ.addConstants A).onFormula ψ, ?_⟩
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, LHom.realize_onFormula]
#align set.definable.map_expansion Set.Definable.map_expansion
theorem definable_iff_exists_formula_sum :
A.Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula (A ⊕ α), s = {v | φ.Realize (Sum.elim (↑) v)} := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv)]
refine exists_congr (fun φ => iff_iff_eq.2 (congr_arg (s = ·) ?_))
ext
simp only [Formula.Realize, BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv, constantsOn, mk₂_Relations,
BoundedFormula.mapTermRelEquiv_symm_apply, mem_setOf_eq]
refine BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_id ?_ (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
intros
simp only [Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply, Term.realize_varsToConstants,
coe_con, Term.realize_relabel]
congr
ext a
rcases a with (_ | _) | _ <;> rfl
theorem empty_definable_iff :
(∅ : Set M).Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (LEquiv.addEmptyConstants L (∅ : Set M)).onFormula]
simp [-constantsOn]
#align set.empty_definable_iff Set.empty_definable_iff
theorem definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params :
A.Definable L s ↔ (∅ : Set M).Definable (L[[A]]) s :=
empty_definable_iff.symm
#align set.definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params Set.definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params
theorem Definable.mono (hAs : A.Definable L s) (hAB : A ⊆ B) : B.Definable L s := by
rw [definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params] at *
exact hAs.map_expansion (L.lhomWithConstantsMap (Set.inclusion hAB))
#align set.definable.mono Set.Definable.mono
@[simp]
theorem definable_empty : A.Definable L (∅ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊥, by
ext
simp⟩
#align set.definable_empty Set.definable_empty
@[simp]
theorem definable_univ : A.Definable L (univ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊤, by
ext
simp⟩
#align set.definable_univ Set.definable_univ
@[simp]
theorem Definable.inter {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∩ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, rfl⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊓ θ, ?_⟩
ext
simp
#align set.definable.inter Set.Definable.inter
@[simp]
theorem Definable.union {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∪ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, hθ⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊔ θ, ?_⟩
ext
rw [hφ, hθ, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.realize_sup, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq]
#align set.definable.union Set.Definable.union
theorem definable_finset_inf {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)} (hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i))
(s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (s.inf f) := by
classical
refine Finset.induction definable_univ (fun i s _ h => ?_) s
rw [Finset.inf_insert]
exact (hf i).inter h
#align set.definable_finset_inf Set.definable_finset_inf
theorem definable_finset_sup {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)} (hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i))
(s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (s.sup f) := by
classical
refine Finset.induction definable_empty (fun i s _ h => ?_) s
rw [Finset.sup_insert]
exact (hf i).union h
#align set.definable_finset_sup Set.definable_finset_sup
theorem definable_finset_biInter {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)}
(hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i)) (s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
rw [← Finset.inf_set_eq_iInter]
exact definable_finset_inf hf s
#align set.definable_finset_bInter Set.definable_finset_biInter
theorem definable_finset_biUnion {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)}
(hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i)) (s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
rw [← Finset.sup_set_eq_biUnion]
exact definable_finset_sup hf s
#align set.definable_finset_bUnion Set.definable_finset_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem Definable.compl {s : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L s) : A.Definable L sᶜ := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
refine ⟨φ.not, ?_⟩
ext v
rw [hφ, compl_setOf, mem_setOf, mem_setOf, Formula.realize_not]
#align set.definable.compl Set.Definable.compl
@[simp]
theorem Definable.sdiff {s t : Set (α → M)} (hs : A.Definable L s) (ht : A.Definable L t) :
A.Definable L (s \ t) :=
hs.inter ht.compl
#align set.definable.sdiff Set.Definable.sdiff
theorem Definable.preimage_comp (f : α → β) {s : Set (α → M)} (h : A.Definable L s) :
A.Definable L ((fun g : β → M => g ∘ f) ⁻¹' s) := by
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨φ.relabel f, ?_⟩
ext
simp only [Set.preimage_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.realize_relabel]
#align set.definable.preimage_comp Set.Definable.preimage_comp
theorem Definable.image_comp_equiv {s : Set (β → M)} (h : A.Definable L s) (f : α ≃ β) :
A.Definable L ((fun g : β → M => g ∘ f) '' s) := by
refine (congr rfl ?_).mp (h.preimage_comp f.symm)
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse]
· intro i
ext b
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
· intro i
ext a
simp
#align set.definable.image_comp_equiv Set.Definable.image_comp_equiv
theorem definable_iff_finitely_definable :
A.Definable L s ↔ ∃ (A0 : Finset M), (A0 : Set M) ⊆ A ∧
(A0 : Set M).Definable L s := by
letI := Classical.decEq M
letI := Classical.decEq α
constructor
· simp only [definable_iff_exists_formula_sum]
rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩
let A0 := (φ.freeVarFinset.preimage Sum.inl
(Function.Injective.injOn Sum.inl_injective)).image Subtype.val
have hA0 : (A0 : Set M) ⊆ A := by simp [A0]
refine ⟨A0, hA0, (φ.restrictFreeVar
(Set.inclusion (Set.Subset.refl _))).relabel ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a | a, ha⟩
· exact Sum.inl (Sum.inl ⟨a, by simpa [A0] using ha⟩)
· exact Sum.inl (Sum.inr a)
· ext v
simp only [Formula.Realize, BoundedFormula.realize_relabel,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
apply Iff.symm
convert BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar _
ext a
rcases a with ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> simp
· rintro ⟨A0, hA0, hd⟩
exact Definable.mono hd hA0
/-- This lemma is only intended as a helper for `Definable.image_comp`. -/
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Definability.lean | 214 | 226 | theorem Definable.image_comp_sum_inl_fin (m : ℕ) {s : Set (Sum α (Fin m) → M)}
(h : A.Definable L s) : A.Definable L ((fun g : Sum α (Fin m) → M => g ∘ Sum.inl) '' s) := by |
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨(BoundedFormula.relabel id φ).exs, ?_⟩
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_image, mem_setOf_eq, BoundedFormula.realize_exs,
BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, Function.comp_id, Fin.castAdd_zero, Fin.cast_refl]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact
⟨y ∘ Sum.inr, (congr (congr rfl (Sum.elim_comp_inl_inr y).symm) (funext finZeroElim)).mp hy⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ⟨Sum.elim x y, (congr rfl (funext finZeroElim)).mp hy, Sum.elim_comp_inl _ _⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EffectiveEpi.Comp
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
/-!
# Functors preserving effective epimorphisms
This file concerns functors which preserve and/or reflect effective epimorphisms and effective
epimorphic families.
## TODO
- Find nice sufficient conditions in terms of preserving/reflecting (co)limits, to preserve/reflect
effective epis, similar to `CategoryTheory.preserves_epi_of_preservesColimit`.
-/
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
variable {C : Type*} [Category C]
noncomputable section Equivalence
variable {D : Type*} [Category D] (e : C ≌ D) {B : C}
variable {α : Type*} (X : α → C) (π : (a : α) → (X a ⟶ B)) [EffectiveEpiFamily X π]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/EffectiveEpi/Preserves.lean | 34 | 42 | theorem effectiveEpiFamilyStructOfEquivalence_aux {W : D} (ε : (a : α) → e.functor.obj (X a) ⟶ W)
(h : ∀ {Z : D} (a₁ a₂ : α) (g₁ : Z ⟶ e.functor.obj (X a₁)) (g₂ : Z ⟶ e.functor.obj (X a₂)),
g₁ ≫ e.functor.map (π a₁) = g₂ ≫ e.functor.map (π a₂) → g₁ ≫ ε a₁ = g₂ ≫ ε a₂)
{Z : C} (a₁ a₂ : α) (g₁ : Z ⟶ X a₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ X a₂) (hg : g₁ ≫ π a₁ = g₂ ≫ π a₂) :
g₁ ≫ (fun a ↦ e.unit.app (X a) ≫ e.inverse.map (ε a)) a₁ =
g₂ ≫ (fun a ↦ e.unit.app (X a) ≫ e.inverse.map (ε a)) a₂ := by |
have := h a₁ a₂ (e.functor.map g₁) (e.functor.map g₂)
simp only [← Functor.map_comp, hg] at this
simpa using congrArg e.inverse.map (this (by trivial))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.PiAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2d5739b61641ee4e7e53eca5688a08f66f2e6a60"
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
#align mv_power_series MvPowerSeries
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n
#align mv_power_series.monomial MvPowerSeries.monomial
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
#align mv_power_series.coeff MvPowerSeries.coeff
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
#align mv_power_series.ext MvPowerSeries.ext
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
theorem ext_iff {φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R} : φ = ψ ↔ ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ :=
Function.funext_iff
#align mv_power_series.ext_iff MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
#align mv_power_series.monomial_def MvPowerSeries.monomial_def
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [coeff, monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m)]
dsimp only
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [LinearMap.stdBasis_apply, Function.update_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact LinearMap.stdBasis_same R (fun _ ↦ R) n a
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_same MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact LinearMap.stdBasis_ne R (fun _ ↦ R) _ _ h a
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_ne MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_ne
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
#align mv_power_series.eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero MvPowerSeries.eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
#align mv_power_series.coeff_comp_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_comp_monomial
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this.
-- @[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
#align mv_power_series.coeff_one MvPowerSeries.coeff_one
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_one MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_one
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.monomial_zero_one MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_one
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
#align mv_power_series.zero_mul MvPowerSeries.zero_mul
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
#align mv_power_series.mul_zero MvPowerSeries.mul_zero
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_mul
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_snd_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_mul_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul_monomial
theorem coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_left]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_add_monomial_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_add_monomial_mul
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 244 | 247 | theorem coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a := by |
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact le_add_left le_rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Multilinear.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.PiTensorProduct
/-!
# Projective seminorm on the tensor of a finite family of normed spaces.
Let `𝕜` be a nontrivially normed field and `E` be a family of normed `𝕜`-vector spaces `Eᵢ`,
indexed by a finite type `ι`. We define a seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, which we call the
"projective seminorm". For `x` an element of `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, its projective seminorm is the
infimum over all expressions of `x` as `∑ j, ⨂ₜ[𝕜] mⱼ i` (with the `mⱼ` ∈ `Π i, Eᵢ`)
of `∑ j, Π i, ‖mⱼ i‖`.
In particular, every norm `‖.‖` on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` satisfying `‖⨂ₜ[𝕜] i, m i‖ ≤ Π i, ‖m i‖`
for every `m` in `Π i, Eᵢ` is bounded above by the projective seminorm.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct.projectiveSeminorm`: The projective seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
## Main results
* `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm`: If `f` is a continuous multilinear map on
`E = Π i, Eᵢ` and `x` is in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, then `‖f.lift x‖ ≤ projectiveSeminorm x * ‖f‖`.
## TODO
* If the base field is `ℝ` or `ℂ` (or more generally if the injection of `Eᵢ` into its bidual is
an isometry for every `i`), then we have `projectiveSeminorm ⨂ₜ[𝕜] i, mᵢ = Π i, ‖mᵢ‖`.
* The functoriality.
-/
universe uι u𝕜 uE uF
variable {ι : Type uι} [Fintype ι]
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : ι → Type uE} [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)]
variable {F : Type uF} [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
open scoped TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
/-- A lift of the projective seminorm to `FreeAddMonoid (𝕜 × Π i, Eᵢ)`, useful to prove the
properties of `projectiveSeminorm`.
-/
def projectiveSeminormAux : FreeAddMonoid (𝕜 × Π i, E i) → ℝ :=
List.sum ∘ (List.map (fun p ↦ ‖p.1‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖))
theorem projectiveSeminormAux_nonneg (p : FreeAddMonoid (𝕜 × Π i, E i)) :
0 ≤ projectiveSeminormAux p := by
simp only [projectiveSeminormAux, Function.comp_apply]
refine List.sum_nonneg ?_
intro a
simp only [Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_map, Prod.exists, forall_exists_index,
and_imp]
intro x m _ h
rw [← h]
exact mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (Finset.prod_nonneg (fun _ _ ↦ norm_nonneg _))
theorem projectiveSeminormAux_add_le (p q : FreeAddMonoid (𝕜 × Π i, E i)) :
projectiveSeminormAux (p + q) ≤ projectiveSeminormAux p + projectiveSeminormAux q := by
simp only [projectiveSeminormAux, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.sum_coe]
erw [List.map_append]
rw [List.sum_append]
rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/PiTensorProduct/ProjectiveSeminorm.lean | 73 | 82 | theorem projectiveSeminormAux_smul (p : FreeAddMonoid (𝕜 × Π i, E i)) (a : 𝕜) :
projectiveSeminormAux (List.map (fun (y : 𝕜 × Π i, E i) ↦ (a * y.1, y.2)) p) =
‖a‖ * projectiveSeminormAux p := by |
simp only [projectiveSeminormAux, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.map_coe, List.map_map,
Multiset.sum_coe]
rw [← smul_eq_mul, List.smul_sum, ← List.comp_map]
congr 2
ext x
simp only [Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [mul_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.PUnitInstances
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import algebra.module.submodule.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# The lattice structure on `Submodule`s
This file defines the lattice structure on submodules, `Submodule.CompleteLattice`, with `⊥`
defined as `{0}` and `⊓` defined as intersection of the underlying carrier.
If `p` and `q` are submodules of a module, `p ≤ q` means that `p ⊆ q`.
Many results about operations on this lattice structure are defined in `LinearAlgebra/Basic.lean`,
most notably those which use `span`.
## Implementation notes
This structure should match the `AddSubmonoid.CompleteLattice` structure, and we should try
to unify the APIs where possible.
-/
universe v
variable {R S M : Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
variable [SMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable {p q : Submodule R M}
namespace Submodule
/-!
## Bottom element of a submodule
-/
/-- The set `{0}` is the bottom element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : Bot (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := {0}
smul_mem' := by simp }⟩
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (Submodule R M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
#align submodule.inhabited' Submodule.inhabited'
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
#align submodule.bot_coe Submodule.bot_coe
@[simp]
theorem bot_toAddSubmonoid : (⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align submodule.bot_to_add_submonoid Submodule.bot_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
lemma bot_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊥ := rfl
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {x : M} : x ∈ (⊥ : Submodule R M) ↔ x = 0 :=
Set.mem_singleton_iff
#align submodule.mem_bot Submodule.mem_bot
instance uniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M) :=
⟨inferInstance, fun x ↦ Subtype.ext <| (mem_bot R).1 x.mem⟩
#align submodule.unique_bot Submodule.uniqueBot
instance : OrderBot (Submodule R M) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le p x := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [zero_mem]
protected theorem eq_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x = (0 : M) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ fun _ hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mp hx,
fun h ↦ eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mpr (h x hx)⟩
#align submodule.eq_bot_iff Submodule.eq_bot_iff
@[ext high]
protected theorem bot_ext (x y : (⊥ : Submodule R M)) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨x, xm⟩; rcases y with ⟨y, ym⟩; congr
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl x xm]
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl y ym]
#align submodule.bot_ext Submodule.bot_ext
protected theorem ne_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ≠ (0 : M) := by
simp only [ne_eq, p.eq_bot_iff, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align submodule.ne_bot_iff Submodule.ne_bot_iff
theorem nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt {p : Submodule R M} (bot_lt : ⊥ < p) : ∃ a : p, a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp bot_lt.ne'
⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂ ∘ congr_arg Subtype.val⟩
#align submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot {p : Submodule R M} (h : p ≠ ⊥) : ∃ b : M, b ∈ p ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp h
⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
#align submodule.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot Submodule.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot
-- FIXME: we default PUnit to PUnit.{1} here without the explicit universe annotation
/-- The bottom submodule is linearly equivalent to punit as an `R`-module. -/
@[simps]
def botEquivPUnit : (⊥ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] PUnit.{v+1} where
toFun _ := PUnit.unit
invFun _ := 0
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := rfl
#align submodule.bot_equiv_punit Submodule.botEquivPUnit
theorem subsingleton_iff_eq_bot : Subsingleton p ↔ p = ⊥ := by
rw [subsingleton_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ by simpa using h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ by simp [h x hx, h y hy]⟩
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton p] : p = ⊥ :=
subsingleton_iff_eq_bot.mp inferInstance
#align submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton Submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot : Nontrivial p ↔ p ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [iff_not_comm, not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, subsingleton_iff_eq_bot]
/-!
## Top element of a submodule
-/
/-- The universal set is the top element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : Top (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := Set.univ
smul_mem' := fun _ _ _ ↦ trivial }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align submodule.top_coe Submodule.top_coe
@[simp]
theorem top_toAddSubmonoid : (⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align submodule.top_to_add_submonoid Submodule.top_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
lemma top_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : M} : x ∈ (⊤ : Submodule R M) :=
trivial
#align submodule.mem_top Submodule.mem_top
instance : OrderTop (Submodule R M) where
top := ⊤
le_top _ _ _ := trivial
theorem eq_top_iff' {p : Submodule R M} : p = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ p :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h _ ↦ h trivial, fun h x _ ↦ h x⟩
#align submodule.eq_top_iff' Submodule.eq_top_iff'
/-- The top submodule is linearly equivalent to the module.
This is the module version of `AddSubmonoid.topEquiv`. -/
@[simps]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] M where
toFun x := x
invFun x := ⟨x, mem_top⟩
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align submodule.top_equiv Submodule.topEquiv
/-!
## Infima & suprema in a submodule
-/
instance : InfSet (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ carrier := ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M)
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [smul_mem] }⟩
private theorem sInf_le' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : p ∈ S → sInf S ≤ p :=
Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
private theorem le_sInf' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : (∀ q ∈ S, p ≤ q) → p ≤ sInf S :=
Set.subset_iInter₂
instance : Inf (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun p q ↦
{ carrier := p ∩ q
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [smul_mem] }⟩
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Submodule R M) :=
{ (inferInstance : OrderTop (Submodule R M)),
(inferInstance : OrderBot (Submodule R M)) with
sup := fun a b ↦ sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ ↦ h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ sInf_le' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ↦ Set.subset_inter
inf_le_left := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_right
le_sSup := fun _ _ hs ↦ le_sInf' fun _ hq ↦ by exact hq _ hs
sSup_le := fun _ _ hs ↦ sInf_le' hs
le_sInf := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf'
sInf_le := fun _ _ ↦ sInf_le' }
#align submodule.complete_lattice Submodule.completeLattice
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : ↑(p ⊓ q) = (p ∩ q : Set M) :=
rfl
#align submodule.inf_coe Submodule.inf_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p q : Submodule R M} {x : M} : x ∈ p ⊓ q ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_inf Submodule.mem_inf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (P : Set (Submodule R M)) : (↑(sInf P) : Set M) = ⋂ p ∈ P, ↑p :=
rfl
#align submodule.Inf_coe Submodule.sInf_coe
@[simp]
theorem finset_inf_coe {ι} (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
(↑(s.inf p) : Set M) = ⋂ i ∈ s, ↑(p i) := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
refine s.induction_on ?_ fun i s _ ih ↦ ?_
· simp
· rw [Finset.inf_insert, inf_coe, ih]
simp
#align submodule.finset_inf_coe Submodule.finset_inf_coe
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Lattice.lean | 251 | 252 | theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → Submodule R M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by |
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.IntegralNormalization
#align_import ring_theory.algebraic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Algebraic elements and algebraic extensions
An element of an R-algebra is algebraic over R if it is the root of a nonzero polynomial.
An R-algebra is algebraic over R if and only if all its elements are algebraic over R.
The main result in this file proves transitivity of algebraicity:
a tower of algebraic field extensions is algebraic.
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial
section
variable (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- An element of an R-algebra is algebraic over R if it is a root of a nonzero polynomial
with coefficients in R. -/
def IsAlgebraic (x : A) : Prop :=
∃ p : R[X], p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval x p = 0
#align is_algebraic IsAlgebraic
/-- An element of an R-algebra is transcendental over R if it is not algebraic over R. -/
def Transcendental (x : A) : Prop :=
¬IsAlgebraic R x
#align transcendental Transcendental
theorem is_transcendental_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (x : A) : Transcendental R x :=
fun ⟨p, h, _⟩ => h <| Subsingleton.elim p 0
#align is_transcendental_of_subsingleton is_transcendental_of_subsingleton
variable {R}
/-- A subalgebra is algebraic if all its elements are algebraic. -/
nonrec
def Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic (S : Subalgebra R A) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ S, IsAlgebraic R x
#align subalgebra.is_algebraic Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic
variable (R A)
/-- An algebra is algebraic if all its elements are algebraic. -/
protected class Algebra.IsAlgebraic : Prop :=
isAlgebraic : ∀ x : A, IsAlgebraic R x
#align algebra.is_algebraic Algebra.IsAlgebraic
variable {R A}
lemma Algebra.isAlgebraic_def : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A ↔ ∀ x : A, IsAlgebraic R x :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
/-- A subalgebra is algebraic if and only if it is algebraic as an algebra. -/
theorem Subalgebra.isAlgebraic_iff (S : Subalgebra R A) :
S.IsAlgebraic ↔ @Algebra.IsAlgebraic R S _ _ S.algebra := by
delta Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic
rw [Subtype.forall', Algebra.isAlgebraic_def]
refine forall_congr' fun x => exists_congr fun p => and_congr Iff.rfl ?_
have h : Function.Injective S.val := Subtype.val_injective
conv_rhs => rw [← h.eq_iff, AlgHom.map_zero]
rw [← aeval_algHom_apply, S.val_apply]
#align subalgebra.is_algebraic_iff Subalgebra.isAlgebraic_iff
/-- An algebra is algebraic if and only if it is algebraic as a subalgebra. -/
theorem Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A ↔ (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).IsAlgebraic := by
delta Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic
simp only [Algebra.isAlgebraic_def, Algebra.mem_top, forall_prop_of_true, iff_self_iff]
#align algebra.is_algebraic_iff Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff
theorem isAlgebraic_iff_not_injective {x : A} :
IsAlgebraic R x ↔ ¬Function.Injective (Polynomial.aeval x : R[X] →ₐ[R] A) := by
simp only [IsAlgebraic, injective_iff_map_eq_zero, not_forall, and_comm, exists_prop]
#align is_algebraic_iff_not_injective isAlgebraic_iff_not_injective
end
section zero_ne_one
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*} {A : Type v} [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing S] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A]
/-- An integral element of an algebra is algebraic. -/
theorem IsIntegral.isAlgebraic [Nontrivial R] {x : A} : IsIntegral R x → IsAlgebraic R x :=
fun ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩ => ⟨p, hp.ne_zero, hpx⟩
#align is_integral.is_algebraic IsIntegral.isAlgebraic
instance Algebra.IsIntegral.isAlgebraic [Nontrivial R] [Algebra.IsIntegral R A] :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A := ⟨fun a ↦ (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral a).isAlgebraic⟩
theorem isAlgebraic_zero [Nontrivial R] : IsAlgebraic R (0 : A) :=
⟨_, X_ne_zero, aeval_X 0⟩
#align is_algebraic_zero isAlgebraic_zero
/-- An element of `R` is algebraic, when viewed as an element of the `R`-algebra `A`. -/
theorem isAlgebraic_algebraMap [Nontrivial R] (x : R) : IsAlgebraic R (algebraMap R A x) :=
⟨_, X_sub_C_ne_zero x, by rw [_root_.map_sub, aeval_X, aeval_C, sub_self]⟩
#align is_algebraic_algebra_map isAlgebraic_algebraMap
theorem isAlgebraic_one [Nontrivial R] : IsAlgebraic R (1 : A) := by
rw [← _root_.map_one (algebraMap R A)]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap 1
#align is_algebraic_one isAlgebraic_one
theorem isAlgebraic_nat [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) : IsAlgebraic R (n : A) := by
rw [← map_natCast (_ : R →+* A) n]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap (Nat.cast n)
#align is_algebraic_nat isAlgebraic_nat
theorem isAlgebraic_int [Nontrivial R] (n : ℤ) : IsAlgebraic R (n : A) := by
rw [← _root_.map_intCast (algebraMap R A)]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap (Int.cast n)
#align is_algebraic_int isAlgebraic_int
theorem isAlgebraic_rat (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [DivisionRing A] [Field R] [Algebra R A] (n : ℚ) :
IsAlgebraic R (n : A) := by
rw [← map_ratCast (algebraMap R A)]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap (Rat.cast n)
#align is_algebraic_rat isAlgebraic_rat
theorem isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [Field R] [Field A] [Algebra R A]
{p : R[X]} {x : A} (hx : x ∈ p.rootSet A) : IsAlgebraic R x :=
⟨p, ne_zero_of_mem_rootSet hx, aeval_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSet hx⟩
#align is_algebraic_of_mem_root_set isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet
open IsScalarTower
protected theorem IsAlgebraic.algebraMap {a : S} :
IsAlgebraic R a → IsAlgebraic R (algebraMap S A a) := fun ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ =>
⟨f, hf₁, by rw [aeval_algebraMap_apply, hf₂, map_zero]⟩
#align is_algebraic_algebra_map_of_is_algebraic IsAlgebraic.algebraMap
section
variable {B} [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
/-- This is slightly more general than `IsAlgebraic.algebraMap` in that it
allows noncommutative intermediate rings `A`. -/
protected theorem IsAlgebraic.algHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) {a : A}
(h : IsAlgebraic R a) : IsAlgebraic R (f a) :=
let ⟨p, hp, ha⟩ := h
⟨p, hp, by rw [aeval_algHom, f.comp_apply, ha, map_zero]⟩
#align is_algebraic_alg_hom_of_is_algebraic IsAlgebraic.algHom
theorem isAlgebraic_algHom_iff (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f)
{a : A} : IsAlgebraic R (f a) ↔ IsAlgebraic R a :=
⟨fun ⟨p, hp0, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨p, hp0, hf <| by rwa [map_zero, ← f.comp_apply, ← aeval_algHom]⟩,
IsAlgebraic.algHom f⟩
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_injective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f)
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic R B] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A :=
⟨fun _ ↦ (isAlgebraic_algHom_iff f hf).mp (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic _)⟩
/-- Transfer `Algebra.IsAlgebraic` across an `AlgEquiv`. -/
theorem AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B)
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R B :=
Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_injective e.symm.toAlgHom e.symm.injective
#align alg_equiv.is_algebraic AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic
theorem AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic_iff (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A ↔ Algebra.IsAlgebraic R B :=
⟨fun _ ↦ e.isAlgebraic, fun _ ↦ e.symm.isAlgebraic⟩
#align alg_equiv.is_algebraic_iff AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic_iff
end
theorem isAlgebraic_algebraMap_iff {a : S} (h : Function.Injective (algebraMap S A)) :
IsAlgebraic R (algebraMap S A a) ↔ IsAlgebraic R a :=
isAlgebraic_algHom_iff (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S A) h
#align is_algebraic_algebra_map_iff isAlgebraic_algebraMap_iff
theorem IsAlgebraic.of_pow {r : A} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (ht : IsAlgebraic R (r ^ n)) :
IsAlgebraic R r := by
obtain ⟨p, p_nonzero, hp⟩ := ht
refine ⟨Polynomial.expand _ n p, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Polynomial.expand_ne_zero hn]
· rwa [Polynomial.expand_aeval n p r]
#align is_algebraic_of_pow IsAlgebraic.of_pow
theorem Transcendental.pow {r : A} (ht : Transcendental R r) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Transcendental R (r ^ n) := fun ht' ↦ ht <| ht'.of_pow hn
#align transcendental.pow Transcendental.pow
lemma IsAlgebraic.invOf {x : S} [Invertible x] (h : IsAlgebraic R x) : IsAlgebraic R (⅟ x) := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := h
refine ⟨p.reverse, by simpa using hp, ?_⟩
rwa [Polynomial.aeval_def, Polynomial.eval₂_reverse_eq_zero_iff, ← Polynomial.aeval_def]
lemma IsAlgebraic.invOf_iff {x : S} [Invertible x] :
IsAlgebraic R (⅟ x) ↔ IsAlgebraic R x :=
⟨IsAlgebraic.invOf, IsAlgebraic.invOf⟩
lemma IsAlgebraic.inv_iff {K} [Field K] [Algebra R K] {x : K} :
IsAlgebraic R (x⁻¹) ↔ IsAlgebraic R x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
letI := invertibleOfNonzero hx
exact IsAlgebraic.invOf_iff (R := R) (x := x)
alias ⟨_, IsAlgebraic.inv⟩ := IsAlgebraic.inv_iff
end zero_ne_one
section Field
variable {K : Type u} {A : Type v} [Field K] [Ring A] [Algebra K A]
/-- An element of an algebra over a field is algebraic if and only if it is integral. -/
theorem isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral {x : A} : IsAlgebraic K x ↔ IsIntegral K x := by
refine ⟨?_, IsIntegral.isAlgebraic⟩
rintro ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩
refine ⟨_, monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hp, ?_⟩
rw [← aeval_def, AlgHom.map_mul, hpx, zero_mul]
#align is_algebraic_iff_is_integral isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral
protected theorem Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A ↔ Algebra.IsIntegral K A := by
rw [Algebra.isAlgebraic_def, Algebra.isIntegral_def,
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
#align algebra.is_algebraic_iff_is_integral Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral
alias ⟨IsAlgebraic.isIntegral, _⟩ := isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral
/-- This used to be an `alias` of `Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral` but that would make
`Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A` an explicit parameter instead of instance implicit. -/
protected instance Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isIntegral [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A] :
Algebra.IsIntegral K A := Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral.mp ‹_›
end Field
section
variable {K L R S A : Type*}
section Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Ring A]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
/-- If x is algebraic over R, then x is algebraic over S when S is an extension of R,
and the map from `R` to `S` is injective. -/
theorem IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective
(hinj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S)) {x : A}
(A_alg : IsAlgebraic R x) : IsAlgebraic S x :=
let ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := A_alg
⟨p.map (algebraMap _ _), by
rwa [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, degree_map_eq_of_injective hinj, degree_eq_bot], by simpa⟩
#align is_algebraic_of_larger_base_of_injective IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective
/-- If A is an algebraic algebra over R, then A is algebraic over S when S is an extension of R,
and the map from `R` to `S` is injective. -/
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective (hinj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S))
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic S A :=
⟨fun _ ↦ _root_.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective hinj (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic _)⟩
#align algebra.is_algebraic_of_larger_base_of_injective Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective
end CommRing
section Field
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Ring A]
variable [Algebra K L] [Algebra L A] [Algebra K A] [IsScalarTower K L A]
variable (L)
/-- If x is algebraic over K, then x is algebraic over L when L is an extension of K -/
theorem IsAlgebraic.tower_top {x : A} (A_alg : IsAlgebraic K x) :
IsAlgebraic L x :=
A_alg.tower_top_of_injective (algebraMap K L).injective
#align is_algebraic_of_larger_base IsAlgebraic.tower_top
/-- If A is an algebraic algebra over K, then A is algebraic over L when L is an extension of K -/
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic L A :=
Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective (algebraMap K L).injective
#align algebra.is_algebraic_of_larger_base Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top
variable (K)
theorem IsAlgebraic.of_finite (e : A) [FiniteDimensional K A] : IsAlgebraic K e :=
(IsIntegral.of_finite K e).isAlgebraic
variable (A)
/-- A field extension is algebraic if it is finite. -/
instance Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite [FiniteDimensional K A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A :=
(IsIntegral.of_finite K A).isAlgebraic
#align algebra.is_algebraic_of_finite Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite
end Field
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Ring A]
variable [Algebra K L] [Algebra L A] [Algebra K A] [IsScalarTower K L A]
/-- If L is an algebraic field extension of K and A is an algebraic algebra over L,
then A is algebraic over K. -/
protected theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.trans
[L_alg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] [A_alg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic L A] :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A := by
rw [Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral] at L_alg A_alg ⊢
exact Algebra.IsIntegral.trans L
#align algebra.is_algebraic_trans Algebra.IsAlgebraic.trans
end CommRing
section NoZeroSMulDivisors
namespace Algebra.IsAlgebraic
variable [CommRing K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra K L] [NoZeroSMulDivisors K L]
theorem algHom_bijective [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] (f : L →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f := by
refine ⟨f.injective, fun b ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic (R := K) b
let f' : p.rootSet L → p.rootSet L := (rootSet_maps_to' (fun x ↦ x) f).restrict f _ _
have : f'.Surjective := Finite.injective_iff_surjective.1
fun _ _ h ↦ Subtype.eq <| f.injective <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := this ⟨b, mem_rootSet.2 ⟨hp, he⟩⟩
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext_iff.1 ha⟩
#align algebra.is_algebraic.alg_hom_bijective Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algHom_bijective
theorem algHom_bijective₂ [Field R] [Algebra K R]
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] (f : L →ₐ[K] R) (g : R →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f ∧ Function.Bijective g :=
(g.injective.bijective₂_of_surjective f.injective (algHom_bijective <| g.comp f).2).symm
theorem bijective_of_isScalarTower [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L]
[Field R] [Algebra K R] [Algebra L R] [IsScalarTower K L R] (f : R →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f :=
(algHom_bijective₂ (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom K L R) f).2
theorem bijective_of_isScalarTower' [Field R] [Algebra K R]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors K R]
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic K R] [Algebra L R] [IsScalarTower K L R] (f : R →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f :=
(algHom_bijective₂ f (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom K L R)).1
variable (K L)
/-- Bijection between algebra equivalences and algebra homomorphisms -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def algEquivEquivAlgHom [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] :
(L ≃ₐ[K] L) ≃* (L →ₐ[K] L) where
toFun ϕ := ϕ.toAlgHom
invFun ϕ := AlgEquiv.ofBijective ϕ (algHom_bijective ϕ)
left_inv _ := by ext; rfl
right_inv _ := by ext; rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align algebra.is_algebraic.alg_equiv_equiv_alg_hom Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom
end Algebra.IsAlgebraic
end NoZeroSMulDivisors
section Field
variable [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra K L]
theorem AlgHom.bijective [FiniteDimensional K L] (ϕ : L →ₐ[K] L) : Function.Bijective ϕ :=
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite K L).algHom_bijective ϕ
#align alg_hom.bijective AlgHom.bijective
variable (K L)
/-- Bijection between algebra equivalences and algebra homomorphisms -/
noncomputable abbrev algEquivEquivAlgHom [FiniteDimensional K L] :
(L ≃ₐ[K] L) ≃* (L →ₐ[K] L) :=
Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom K L
#align alg_equiv_equiv_alg_hom algEquivEquivAlgHom
end Field
end
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [CommRing S]
theorem exists_integral_multiple [Algebra R S] {z : S} (hz : IsAlgebraic R z)
(inj : ∀ x, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) :
∃ᵉ (x : integralClosure R S) (y ≠ (0 : R)), z * algebraMap R S y = x := by
rcases hz with ⟨p, p_ne_zero, px⟩
set a := p.leadingCoeff
have a_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 := mt Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp p_ne_zero
have x_integral : IsIntegral R (z * algebraMap R S a) :=
⟨p.integralNormalization, monic_integralNormalization p_ne_zero,
integralNormalization_aeval_eq_zero px inj⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, x_integral⟩, a, a_ne_zero, rfl⟩
#align exists_integral_multiple exists_integral_multiple
/-- A fraction `(a : S) / (b : S)` can be reduced to `(c : S) / (d : R)`,
if `S` is the integral closure of `R` in an algebraic extension `L` of `R`. -/
theorem IsIntegralClosure.exists_smul_eq_mul {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra R S] [Algebra S L]
[Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R S L] [IsIntegralClosure S R L] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic R L]
(inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R L)) (a : S) {b : S} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ᵉ (c : S) (d ≠ (0 : R)), d • a = b * c := by
obtain ⟨c, d, d_ne, hx⟩ :=
exists_integral_multiple (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic (algebraMap _ L a / algebraMap _ L b))
((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp inj)
refine
⟨IsIntegralClosure.mk' S (c : L) c.2, d, d_ne, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_injective S R L ?_⟩
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_mul, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_mk', ← hx, ←
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
rw [← mul_assoc _ (_ / _), mul_div_cancel₀ (algebraMap S L a), mul_comm]
exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_injective S R L) _) hb
#align is_integral_closure.exists_smul_eq_mul IsIntegralClosure.exists_smul_eq_mul
section Field
variable {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] (A : Subalgebra K L)
theorem inv_eq_of_aeval_divX_ne_zero {x : L} {p : K[X]} (aeval_ne : aeval x (divX p) ≠ 0) :
x⁻¹ = aeval x (divX p) / (aeval x p - algebraMap _ _ (p.coeff 0)) := by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, inv_div, eq_comm, div_eq_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm]
conv_lhs => rw [← divX_mul_X_add p]
· rw [AlgHom.map_add, AlgHom.map_mul, aeval_X, aeval_C]
· exact aeval_ne
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inv_eq_of_aeval_div_X_ne_zero inv_eq_of_aeval_divX_ne_zero
theorem inv_eq_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero {x : L} {p : K[X]} (aeval_eq : aeval x p = 0)
(coeff_zero_ne : p.coeff 0 ≠ 0) : x⁻¹ = -(aeval x (divX p) / algebraMap _ _ (p.coeff 0)) := by
convert inv_eq_of_aeval_divX_ne_zero (p := p) (L := L)
(mt (fun h => (algebraMap K L).injective ?_) coeff_zero_ne) using 1
· rw [aeval_eq, zero_sub, div_neg]
rw [RingHom.map_zero]
convert aeval_eq
conv_rhs => rw [← divX_mul_X_add p]
rw [AlgHom.map_add, AlgHom.map_mul, h, zero_mul, zero_add, aeval_C]
#align inv_eq_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero inv_eq_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero
theorem Subalgebra.inv_mem_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero {x : A} {p : K[X]}
(aeval_eq : aeval x p = 0) (coeff_zero_ne : p.coeff 0 ≠ 0) : (x⁻¹ : L) ∈ A := by
suffices (x⁻¹ : L) = (-p.coeff 0)⁻¹ • aeval x (divX p) by
rw [this]
exact A.smul_mem (aeval x _).2 _
have : aeval (x : L) p = 0 := by rw [Subalgebra.aeval_coe, aeval_eq, Subalgebra.coe_zero]
-- Porting note: this was a long sequence of `rw`.
rw [inv_eq_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero this coeff_zero_ne, div_eq_inv_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
simp only [aeval_coe, Submonoid.coe_mul, Subsemiring.coe_toSubmonoid, coe_toSubsemiring,
coe_algebraMap]
rw [map_inv₀, map_neg, inv_neg, neg_mul]
#align subalgebra.inv_mem_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero Subalgebra.inv_mem_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Algebraic.lean | 463 | 479 | theorem Subalgebra.inv_mem_of_algebraic {x : A} (hx : _root_.IsAlgebraic K (x : L)) :
(x⁻¹ : L) ∈ A := by |
obtain ⟨p, ne_zero, aeval_eq⟩ := hx
rw [Subalgebra.aeval_coe, Subalgebra.coe_eq_zero] at aeval_eq
revert ne_zero aeval_eq
refine p.recOnHorner ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro h
contradiction
· intro p a hp ha _ih _ne_zero aeval_eq
refine A.inv_mem_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero aeval_eq ?_
rwa [coeff_add, hp, zero_add, coeff_C, if_pos rfl]
· intro p hp ih _ne_zero aeval_eq
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, aeval_X, mul_eq_zero] at aeval_eq
cases' aeval_eq with aeval_eq x_eq
· exact ih hp aeval_eq
· rw [x_eq, Subalgebra.coe_zero, inv_zero]
exact A.zero_mem
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Semicontinuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableSequence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# Borel sigma algebras on spaces with orders
## Main statements
* `borel_eq_generateFrom_Ixx` (where Ixx is one of {Iio, Ioi, Iic, Ici, Ico, Ioc}):
The Borel sigma algebra of a linear order topology is generated by intervals of the given kind.
* `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem`, `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem`:
The Borel sigma algebra of a dense linear order topology is generated by intervals of a given
kind, with endpoints from dense subsets.
* `ext_of_Ico`, `ext_of_Ioc`:
A locally finite Borel measure on a second countable conditionally complete linear order is
characterized by the measures of intervals of the given kind.
* `ext_of_Iic`, `ext_of_Ici`:
A finite Borel measure on a second countable linear order is characterized by the measures of
intervals of the given kind.
* `UpperSemicontinuous.measurable`, `LowerSemicontinuous.measurable`:
Semicontinuous functions are measurable.
* `measurable_iSup`, `measurable_iInf`, `measurable_sSup`, `measurable_sInf`:
Countable supremums and infimums of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
* `measurable_liminf`, `measurable_limsup`:
Countable liminfs and limsups of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
-/
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
section OrderTopology
variable (α)
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio : borel α = .generateFrom (range Iio) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le ?_)
· rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_of_subbasis (@OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _)]
letI : MeasurableSpace α := MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iio)
have H : ∀ a : α, MeasurableSet (Iio a) := fun a => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
refine generateFrom_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩
· rcases em (∃ b, a ⋖ b) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hcovBy
· rw [hb.Ioi_eq, ← compl_Iio]
exact (H _).compl
· rcases isOpen_biUnion_countable (Ioi a) Ioi fun _ _ ↦ isOpen_Ioi with ⟨t, hat, htc, htU⟩
have : Ioi a = ⋃ b ∈ t, Ici b := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ <| iUnion₂_subset fun b hb ↦ Ici_subset_Ioi.2 (hat hb)
refine Subset.trans ?_ <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self
simpa [CovBy, htU, subset_def] using hcovBy
simp only [this, ← compl_Iio]
exact .biUnion htc <| fun _ _ ↦ (H _).compl
· apply H
· rw [forall_mem_range]
intro a
exact GenerateMeasurable.basic _ isOpen_Iio
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Iio borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi : borel α = .generateFrom (range Ioi) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio αᵒᵈ _ (by infer_instance : SecondCountableTopology α) _ _
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Ioi borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic :
borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iic) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Ioi]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Iic borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici : borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Ici) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Ici borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici
end OrderTopology
section Orders
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
variable [MeasurableSpace δ]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α}
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a) :=
isClosed_Ici.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Ici measurableSet_Ici
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a) :=
isClosed_Iic.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Iic measurableSet_Iic
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Icc : MeasurableSet (Icc a b) :=
isClosed_Icc.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Icc measurableSet_Icc
instance nhdsWithin_Ici_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ici b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ici.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Ici_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Ici_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_Iic_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iic b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iic.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Iic_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Iic_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[Icc a b] x) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, nhdsWithin_inter]
infer_instance
#align nhds_within_Icc_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance atTop_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atTop : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
#align at_top_is_measurably_generated atTop_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance atBot_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atBot : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
#align at_bot_is_measurably_generated atBot_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance [R1Space α] : IsMeasurablyGenerated (cocompact α) where
exists_measurable_subset := by
intro _ hs
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := mem_cocompact.mp hs
exact ⟨(closure t)ᶜ, ht.closure.compl_mem_cocompact, isClosed_closure.measurableSet.compl,
(compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure).trans hts⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {a b : α}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le' : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_le' measurableSet_le'
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
MeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } :=
hf.prod_mk hg measurableSet_le'
#align measurable_set_le measurableSet_le
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α}
-- we open this locale only here to avoid issues with list being treated as intervals above
open Interval
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iio : MeasurableSet (Iio a) :=
isOpen_Iio.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Iio measurableSet_Iio
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioi : MeasurableSet (Ioi a) :=
isOpen_Ioi.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Ioi measurableSet_Ioi
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Ioo a b) :=
isOpen_Ioo.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_Ioo measurableSet_Ioo
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc a b) :=
measurableSet_Ioi.inter measurableSet_Iic
#align measurable_set_Ioc measurableSet_Ioc
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ico : MeasurableSet (Ico a b) :=
measurableSet_Ici.inter measurableSet_Iio
#align measurable_set_Ico measurableSet_Ico
instance nhdsWithin_Ioi_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ioi b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Ioi_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Ioi_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_Iio_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iio b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iio.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
#align nhds_within_Iio_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_Iio_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance nhdsWithin_uIcc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[[[a, b]]] x) :=
nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated
#align nhds_within_uIcc_is_measurably_generated nhdsWithin_uIcc_isMeasurablyGenerated
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } :=
(isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd).measurableSet
#align measurable_set_lt' measurableSet_lt'
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } :=
hf.prod_mk hg measurableSet_lt'
#align measurable_set_lt measurableSet_lt
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ} {f g : δ → α}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : NullMeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } μ :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_lt'
#align null_measurable_set_lt nullMeasurableSet_lt
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure (α × α)} :
NullMeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } μ :=
measurableSet_lt'.nullMeasurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_le [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ}
{f g : δ → α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
NullMeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } μ :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_le'
theorem Set.OrdConnected.measurableSet (h : OrdConnected s) : MeasurableSet s := by
let u := ⋃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Ioo x y
have huopen : IsOpen u := isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_Ioo
have humeas : MeasurableSet u := huopen.measurableSet
have hfinite : (s \ u).Finite := s.finite_diff_iUnion_Ioo
have : u ⊆ s := iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => iUnion₂_subset fun y hy =>
Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans (h.out hx hy)
rw [← union_diff_cancel this]
exact humeas.union hfinite.measurableSet
#align set.ord_connected.measurable_set Set.OrdConnected.measurableSet
theorem IsPreconnected.measurableSet (h : IsPreconnected s) : MeasurableSet s :=
h.ordConnected.measurableSet
#align is_preconnected.measurable_set IsPreconnected.measurableSet
theorem generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderClosedTopology α] (s t : Set α) :
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ t, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
≤ borel α := by
apply generateFrom_le
borelize α
rintro _ ⟨a, -, b, -, -, rfl⟩
exact measurableSet_Ico
#align generate_from_Ico_mem_le_borel generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → y ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
set S : Set (Set α) := { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel _ _)
letI : MeasurableSpace α := generateFrom S
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio]
refine generateFrom_le (forall_mem_range.2 fun a => ?_)
rcases hd.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top with ⟨t, hts, hc, htd, htb, -⟩
by_cases ha : ∀ b < a, (Ioo b a).Nonempty
· convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (u ∈ t) (_ : l < u) (_ : u ≤ a), Ico l u)
· ext y
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Iio, mem_Ico]
constructor
· intro hy
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) y with ⟨l, hlt, hly⟩
rcases htd.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioo (ha y hy) with ⟨u, hut, hyu, hua⟩
exact ⟨l, hlt, u, hut, hly.trans_lt hyu, hua.le, hly, hyu⟩
· rintro ⟨l, -, u, -, -, hua, -, hyu⟩
exact hyu.trans_le hua
· refine MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun a ha => MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun b hb => ?_
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hab => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨a, hts ha, b, hts hb, hab, mem_singleton _⟩
· simp only [not_forall, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at ha
replace ha : a ∈ s := hIoo ha.choose a ha.choose_spec.fst ha.choose_spec.snd
convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (_ : l < a), Ico l a)
· symm
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, inter_eq_right, subset_def, mem_iUnion,
mem_Ici, mem_Iio]
intro x hx
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) x with ⟨z, hzt, hzx⟩
exact ⟨z, hzt, hzx.trans_lt hx, hzx⟩
· refine .biUnion hc fun x hx => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hlt => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨x, hts hx, a, ha, hlt, mem_singleton _⟩
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ico_mem_aux Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (by simp) fun x y hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ico_mem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ (l u : α), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and_iff] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Ico borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → x ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by
convert hd.orderDual.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux hbot fun x y hlt he => hIoo y x hlt _
using 2
· ext s
constructor <;> rintro ⟨l, hl, u, hu, hlt, rfl⟩
exacts [⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, dual_Ico⟩, ⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, dual_Ioc⟩]
· erw [dual_Ioo]
exact he
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ioc_mem_aux Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (by simp) fun x y hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
#align dense.borel_eq_generate_from_Ioc_mem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l u, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and_iff] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
#align borel_eq_generate_from_Ioc borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all closed-open intervals. If
`α` is a conditionally complete linear order with no top element,
`MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ico` is an extensionality lemma with weaker assumptions on `μ` and
`ν`. -/
theorem ext_of_Ico_finite {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμν : μ univ = ν univ) (h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) = ν (Ico a b)) :
μ = ν := by
refine
ext_of_generate_finite _ (BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico α))
(isPiSystem_Ico (id : α → α) id) ?_ hμν
rintro - ⟨a, b, hlt, rfl⟩
exact h hlt
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Ico_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ico_finite
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all open-closed intervals. If
`α` is a conditionally complete linear order with no top element,
`MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ioc` is an extensionality lemma with weaker assumptions on `μ` and
`ν`. -/
theorem ext_of_Ioc_finite {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμν : μ univ = ν univ) (h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) = ν (Ioc a b)) :
μ = ν := by
refine @ext_of_Ico_finite αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ ‹_› μ ν _ hμν fun a b hab => ?_
erw [dual_Ico (α := α)]
exact h hab
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Ioc_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ioc_finite
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
closed-open intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ico' {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [NoMaxOrder α]
(μ ν : Measure α) (hμ : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) = ν (Ico a b)) : μ = ν := by
rcases exists_countable_dense_bot_top α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd, hsb, _⟩
have : (⋃ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ s) (_ : l < u), {Ico l u} : Set (Set α)).Countable :=
hsc.biUnion fun l _ => hsc.biUnion fun u _ => countable_iUnion fun _ => countable_singleton _
simp only [← setOf_eq_eq_singleton, ← setOf_exists] at this
refine
Measure.ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset
(BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico α)) (isPiSystem_Ico id id) ?_ this
?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨l, -, u, -, h, rfl⟩
exact ⟨l, u, h, rfl⟩
· refine sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ?_
rcases hsd.exists_le' hsb x with ⟨l, hls, hlx⟩
rcases hsd.exists_gt x with ⟨u, hus, hxu⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨l, hls, u, hus, hlx.trans_lt hxu, rfl⟩, hlx, hxu⟩
· rintro _ ⟨l, -, u, -, hlt, rfl⟩
exact hμ hlt
· rintro _ ⟨l, u, hlt, rfl⟩
exact h hlt
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Ico' MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ico'
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
open-closed intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ioc' {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [NoMinOrder α]
(μ ν : Measure α) (hμ : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) = ν (Ioc a b)) : μ = ν := by
refine @ext_of_Ico' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ ‹_› _ μ ν ?_ ?_ <;> intro a b hab <;> erw [dual_Ico (α := α)]
exacts [hμ hab, h hab]
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Ioc' MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ioc'
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
closed-open intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ico {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
[BorelSpace α] [NoMaxOrder α] (μ ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) = ν (Ico a b)) : μ = ν :=
μ.ext_of_Ico' ν (fun _ _ _ => measure_Ico_lt_top.ne) h
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Ico MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ico
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
open-closed intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ioc {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
[BorelSpace α] [NoMinOrder α] (μ ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) = ν (Ioc a b)) : μ = ν :=
μ.ext_of_Ioc' ν (fun _ _ _ => measure_Ioc_lt_top.ne) h
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Ioc MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ioc
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all left-infinite right-closed
intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Iic {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h : ∀ a, μ (Iic a) = ν (Iic a)) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_Ioc_finite μ ν ?_ fun a b hlt => ?_
· rcases exists_countable_dense_bot_top α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd, -, hst⟩
have : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s := directedOn_iff_directed.2 (Subtype.mono_coe _).directed_le
simp only [← biSup_measure_Iic hsc (hsd.exists_ge' hst) this, h]
rw [← Iic_diff_Iic, measure_diff (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hlt.le) measurableSet_Iic,
measure_diff (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hlt.le) measurableSet_Iic, h a, h b]
· rw [← h a]
exact (measure_lt_top μ _).ne
· exact (measure_lt_top μ _).ne
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Iic MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Iic
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all left-closed right-infinite
intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ici {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h : ∀ a, μ (Ici a) = ν (Ici a)) : μ = ν :=
@ext_of_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ ‹_› _ _ _ h
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Ici MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ici
end MeasureTheory.Measure
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_uIcc : MeasurableSet (uIcc a b) :=
measurableSet_Icc
#align measurable_set_uIcc measurableSet_uIcc
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_uIoc : MeasurableSet (uIoc a b) :=
measurableSet_Ioc
#align measurable_set_uIoc measurableSet_uIoc
variable [SecondCountableTopology α]
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.max {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => max (f a) (g a) := by
simpa only [max_def'] using hf.piecewise (measurableSet_le hg hf) hg
#align measurable.max Measurable.max
@[measurability]
nonrec theorem AEMeasurable.max {f g : δ → α} {μ : Measure δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : AEMeasurable (fun a => max (f a) (g a)) μ :=
⟨fun a => max (hf.mk f a) (hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.max hg.measurable_mk,
EventuallyEq.comp₂ hf.ae_eq_mk _ hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align ae_measurable.max AEMeasurable.max
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.min {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => min (f a) (g a) := by
simpa only [min_def] using hf.piecewise (measurableSet_le hf hg) hg
#align measurable.min Measurable.min
@[measurability]
nonrec theorem AEMeasurable.min {f g : δ → α} {μ : Measure δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : AEMeasurable (fun a => min (f a) (g a)) μ :=
⟨fun a => min (hf.mk f a) (hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.min hg.measurable_mk,
EventuallyEq.comp₂ hf.ae_eq_mk _ hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align ae_measurable.min AEMeasurable.min
end LinearOrder
section Lattice
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [MeasurableSpace γ] [BorelSpace γ]
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousSup.measurableSup [Sup γ] [ContinuousSup γ] :
MeasurableSup γ where
measurable_const_sup _ := (continuous_const.sup continuous_id).measurable
measurable_sup_const _ := (continuous_id.sup continuous_const).measurable
#align has_continuous_sup.has_measurable_sup ContinuousSup.measurableSup
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousSup.measurableSup₂ [SecondCountableTopology γ] [Sup γ]
[ContinuousSup γ] : MeasurableSup₂ γ :=
⟨continuous_sup.measurable⟩
#align has_continuous_sup.has_measurable_sup₂ ContinuousSup.measurableSup₂
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousInf.measurableInf [Inf γ] [ContinuousInf γ] :
MeasurableInf γ where
measurable_const_inf _ := (continuous_const.inf continuous_id).measurable
measurable_inf_const _ := (continuous_id.inf continuous_const).measurable
#align has_continuous_inf.has_measurable_inf ContinuousInf.measurableInf
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousInf.measurableInf₂ [SecondCountableTopology γ] [Inf γ]
[ContinuousInf γ] : MeasurableInf₂ γ :=
⟨continuous_inf.measurable⟩
#align has_continuous_inf.has_measurable_inf₂ ContinuousInf.measurableInf₂
end Lattice
end Orders
section BorelSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α]
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
variable [MeasurableSpace δ]
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
theorem measurable_of_Iio {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Iio x)) : Measurable f := by
convert measurable_generateFrom (α := δ) _
· exact BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio _)
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact hf x
#align measurable_of_Iio measurable_of_Iio
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.measurable [TopologicalSpace δ] [OpensMeasurableSpace δ] {f : δ → α}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_Iio fun y => (hf.isOpen_preimage y).measurableSet
#align upper_semicontinuous.measurable UpperSemicontinuous.measurable
theorem measurable_of_Ioi {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Ioi x)) : Measurable f := by
convert measurable_generateFrom (α := δ) _
· exact BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi _)
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact hf x
#align measurable_of_Ioi measurable_of_Ioi
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.measurable [TopologicalSpace δ] [OpensMeasurableSpace δ] {f : δ → α}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_Ioi fun y => (hf.isOpen_preimage y).measurableSet
#align lower_semicontinuous.measurable LowerSemicontinuous.measurable
theorem measurable_of_Iic {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Iic x)) : Measurable f := by
apply measurable_of_Ioi
simp_rw [← compl_Iic, preimage_compl, MeasurableSet.compl_iff]
assumption
#align measurable_of_Iic measurable_of_Iic
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Order.lean | 568 | 571 | theorem measurable_of_Ici {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Ici x)) : Measurable f := by |
apply measurable_of_Iio
simp_rw [← compl_Ici, preimage_compl, MeasurableSet.compl_iff]
assumption
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import order.filter.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `Filter` : filters on a set;
* `Filter.principal` : filter of all sets containing a given set;
* `Filter.map`, `Filter.comap` : operations on filters;
* `Filter.Tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `Filter.Eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `Filter.Frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` :
a tactic that takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`,
and replaces a goal `s ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `Filter.NeBot f` : a utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `Filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `Filter.Tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on Topology.Basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from Topology.Basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Order
open scoped Classical
universe u v w x y
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure Filter (α : Type*) where
/-- The set of sets that belong to the filter. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set `Set.univ` belongs to any filter. -/
univ_sets : Set.univ ∈ sets
/-- If a set belongs to a filter, then its superset belongs to the filter as well. -/
sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets
/-- If two sets belong to a filter, then their intersection belongs to the filter as well. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets
#align filter Filter
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (Filter α) :=
⟨fun U F => U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_mk {t : Set (Set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_mk Filter.mem_mk
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sets Filter.mem_sets
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
#align filter.inhabited_mem Filter.inhabitedMem
theorem filter_eq : ∀ {f g : Filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align filter.filter_eq Filter.filter_eq
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
#align filter.filter_eq_iff Filter.filter_eq_iff
protected theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g := by
simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, Filter.mem_sets]
#align filter.ext_iff Filter.ext_iff
@[ext]
protected theorem ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
Filter.ext_iff.2
#align filter.ext Filter.ext
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
#align filter.coext Filter.coext
@[simp]
theorem univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
#align filter.univ_mem Filter.univ_mem
theorem mem_of_superset {x y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ f) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset hx hxy
#align filter.mem_of_superset Filter.mem_of_superset
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
theorem inter_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets hs ht
#align filter.inter_mem Filter.inter_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_iff Filter.inter_mem_iff
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.diff_mem Filter.diff_mem
theorem univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => h x
#align filter.univ_mem' Filter.univ_mem'
theorem mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : { x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t } ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ h₁
#align filter.mp_mem Filter.mp_mem
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
#align filter.congr_sets Filter.congr_sets
/-- Override `sets` field of a filter to provide better definitional equality. -/
protected def copy (f : Filter α) (S : Set (Set α)) (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : Filter α where
sets := S
univ_sets := (hmem _).2 univ_mem
sets_of_superset h hsub := (hmem _).2 <| mem_of_superset ((hmem _).1 h) hsub
inter_sets h₁ h₂ := (hmem _).2 <| inter_mem ((hmem _).1 h₁) ((hmem _).1 h₂)
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
@[simp] lemma mem_copy {S hmem} : s ∈ f.copy S hmem ↔ s ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem biInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Finite) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
Finite.induction_on hf (by simp) fun _ _ hs => by simp [hs]
#align filter.bInter_mem Filter.biInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem biInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} (is : Finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
biInter_mem is.finite_toSet
#align filter.bInter_finset_mem Filter.biInter_finset_mem
alias _root_.Finset.iInter_mem_sets := biInter_finset_mem
#align finset.Inter_mem_sets Finset.iInter_mem_sets
-- attribute [protected] Finset.iInter_mem_sets porting note: doesn't work
@[simp]
theorem sInter_mem {s : Set (Set α)} (hfin : s.Finite) : ⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem hfin]
#align filter.sInter_mem Filter.sInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem iInter_mem {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Finite β] : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
(sInter_mem (finite_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align filter.Inter_mem Filter.iInter_mem
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_subset_iff Filter.exists_mem_subset_iff
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
#align filter.monotone_mem Filter.monotone_mem
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_and_iff Filter.exists_mem_and_iff
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
#align filter.forall_in_swap Filter.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
/--
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f` and terms
`h₁ : t₁ ∈ f, ⋯, hₙ : tₙ ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t₁ → ⋯ → x ∈ tₙ → x ∈ s`.
The list is an optional parameter, `[]` being its default value.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ], intros a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ }`.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] using e` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
Combining both shortcuts is done by writing `filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ using e`.
Note that in this case, the `aᵢ` terms can be used in `e`.
-/
syntax (name := filterUpwards) "filter_upwards" (" [" term,* "]")?
(" with" (ppSpace colGt term:max)*)? (" using " term)? : tactic
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| filter_upwards $[[$[$args],*]]? $[with $wth*]? $[using $usingArg]?) => do
let config : ApplyConfig := {newGoals := ApplyNewGoals.nonDependentOnly}
for e in args.getD #[] |>.reverse do
let goal ← getMainGoal
replaceMainGoal <| ← goal.withContext <| runTermElab do
let m ← mkFreshExprMVar none
let lem ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType
(← ``(Filter.mp_mem $e $(← Term.exprToSyntax m))) (← goal.getType)
goal.assign lem
return [m.mvarId!]
liftMetaTactic fun goal => do
goal.apply (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``Filter.univ_mem') config
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| dsimp (config := {zeta := false}) only [Set.mem_setOf_eq])
if let some l := wth then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| intro $[$l]*)
if let some e := usingArg then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| exact $e)
end Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
section Principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : Set α) : Filter α where
sets := { t | s ⊆ t }
univ_sets := subset_univ s
sets_of_superset hx := Subset.trans hx
inter_sets := subset_inter
#align filter.principal Filter.principal
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "𝓟" => Filter.principal
@[simp] theorem mem_principal {s t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal Filter.mem_principal
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal_self Filter.mem_principal_self
end Principal
open Filter
section Join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : Filter (Filter α)) : Filter α where
sets := { s | { t : Filter α | s ∈ t } ∈ f }
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, univ_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, setOf_true]
sets_of_superset hx xy := mem_of_superset hx fun f h => mem_of_superset h xy
inter_sets hx hy := mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) fun f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => inter_mem h₁ h₂
#align filter.join Filter.join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {s : Set α} {f : Filter (Filter α)} : s ∈ join f ↔ { t | s ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_join Filter.mem_join
end Join
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance : PartialOrder (Filter α) where
le f g := ∀ ⦃U : Set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := filter_eq <| Subset.antisymm h₂ h₁
le_refl a := Subset.rfl
le_trans a b c h₁ h₂ := Subset.trans h₂ h₁
theorem le_def : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.le_def Filter.le_def
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align filter.not_le Filter.not_le
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
#align filter.generate_sets Filter.GenerateSets
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
#align filter.generate Filter.generate
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
#align filter.sets_iff_generate Filter.le_generate_iff
theorem mem_generate_iff {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction h with
| @basic V V_in =>
exact ⟨{V}, singleton_subset_iff.2 V_in, finite_singleton _, (sInter_singleton _).subset⟩
| univ => exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, finite_empty, subset_univ _⟩
| superset _ hVW hV =>
rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, ht, htV.trans hVW⟩
| inter _ _ hV hW =>
rcases hV, hW with ⟨⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩, u, hus, hu, huW⟩
exact
⟨t ∪ u, union_subset hts hus, ht.union hu,
(sInter_union _ _).subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter htV huW⟩
· rcases h with ⟨t, hts, tfin, h⟩
exact mem_of_superset ((sInter_mem tfin).2 fun V hV => GenerateSets.basic <| hts hV) h
#align filter.mem_generate_iff Filter.mem_generate_iff
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
#align filter.mk_of_closure Filter.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.mk_of_closure_sets Filter.mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align filter.gi_generate Filter.giGenerate
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : Inf (Filter α) :=
⟨fun f g : Filter α =>
{ sets := { s | ∃ a ∈ f, ∃ b ∈ g, s = a ∩ b }
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy
refine
⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha subset_union_left, b ∪ y,
mem_of_superset hb subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
inter_sets := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, ?_⟩
ac_rfl }⟩
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inf_iff Filter.mem_inf_iff
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_left Filter.mem_inf_of_left
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_right Filter.mem_inf_of_right
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_inf Filter.inter_mem_inf
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
#align filter.mem_inf_of_inter Filter.mem_inf_of_inter
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_iff_superset Filter.mem_inf_iff_superset
instance : Top (Filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := { s | ∀ x, x ∈ s }
univ_sets := fun x => mem_univ x
sets_of_superset := fun hx hxy a => hxy (hx a)
inter_sets := fun hx hy _ => mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
theorem mem_top_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_top_iff_forall Filter.mem_top_iff_forall
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ s = univ := by
rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.mem_top Filter.mem_top
section CompleteLattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for some lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) :=
{ @OrderDual.instCompleteLattice _ (giGenerate α).liftCompleteLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _s hs => (mem_top.1 hs).symm ▸ univ_mem
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
sSup := join ∘ 𝓟
le_sSup := fun _ _f hf _s hs => hs hf
sSup_le := fun _ _f hf _s hs _g hg => hf _ hg hs }
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
/-- A filter is `NeBot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set does not belong to
the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition of a filter but we prefer to have a
`CompleteLattice` structure on `Filter _`, so we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class NeBot (f : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- The filter is nontrivial: `f ≠ ⊥` or equivalently, `∅ ∉ f`. -/
ne' : f ≠ ⊥
#align filter.ne_bot Filter.NeBot
theorem neBot_iff {f : Filter α} : NeBot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.ne_bot_iff Filter.neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
#align filter.ne_bot.ne Filter.NeBot.ne
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
#align filter.not_ne_bot Filter.not_neBot
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.mono Filter.NeBot.mono
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
#align filter.ne_bot_of_le Filter.neBot_of_le
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.sup_ne_bot Filter.sup_neBot
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
#align filter.not_disjoint_self_iff Filter.not_disjoint_self_iff
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
#align filter.bot_sets_eq Filter.bot_sets_eq
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
#align filter.sup_sets_eq Filter.sup_sets_eq
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
#align filter.Sup_sets_eq Filter.sSup_sets_eq
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
#align filter.supr_sets_eq Filter.iSup_sets_eq
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
#align filter.generate_empty Filter.generate_empty
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
#align filter.generate_univ Filter.generate_univ
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
#align filter.generate_union Filter.generate_union
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
#align filter.generate_Union Filter.generate_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : Filter α) :=
trivial
#align filter.mem_bot Filter.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sup Filter.mem_sup
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
#align filter.union_mem_sup Filter.union_mem_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {x : Set α} {s : Set (Filter α)} : x ∈ sSup s ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : Filter α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_Sup Filter.mem_sSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter]
#align filter.mem_supr Filter.mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
#align filter.supr_ne_bot Filter.iSup_neBot
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
show generate _ = generate _ from congr_arg _ <| congr_arg sSup <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align filter.infi_eq_generate Filter.iInf_eq_generate
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
#align filter.mem_infi_of_mem Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem
theorem mem_iInf_of_iInter {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} {I : Set ι} (I_fin : I.Finite)
{V : I → Set α} (hV : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i) (hU : ⋂ i, V i ⊆ U) : U ∈ ⨅ i, s i := by
haveI := I_fin.fintype
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 fun i => ?_) hU
exact mem_iInf_of_mem (i : ι) (hV _)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_Inter Filter.mem_iInf_of_iInter
theorem mem_iInf {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : I → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
constructor
· rw [iInf_eq_generate, mem_generate_iff]
rintro ⟨t, tsub, tfin, tinter⟩
rcases eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion tfin tsub with ⟨I, Ifin, σ, σfin, σsub, rfl⟩
rw [sInter_iUnion] at tinter
set V := fun i => U ∪ ⋂₀ σ i with hV
have V_in : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i := by
rintro i
have : ⋂₀ σ i ∈ s i := by
rw [sInter_mem (σfin _)]
apply σsub
exact mem_of_superset this subset_union_right
refine ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, ?_⟩
rwa [hV, ← union_iInter, union_eq_self_of_subset_right]
· rintro ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInf_of_iInter Ifin V_in Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_infi Filter.mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf' {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : ι → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧
(∀ i ∉ I, V i = univ) ∧ (U = ⋂ i ∈ I, V i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
simp only [mem_iInf, SetCoe.forall', biInter_eq_iInter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨I, If, V, hVs, _, hVU, _⟩ => ⟨I, If, fun i => V i, fun i => hVs i, hVU⟩⟩
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hV, rfl⟩
refine ⟨I, If, fun i => if hi : i ∈ I then V ⟨i, hi⟩ else univ, fun i => ?_, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [hV _, univ_mem]
· exact dif_neg hi
· simp only [iInter_dite, biInter_eq_iInter, dif_pos (Subtype.coe_prop _), Subtype.coe_eta,
iInter_univ, inter_univ, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
#align filter.mem_infi' Filter.mem_iInf'
theorem exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} {s}
(hs : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) : ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
let ⟨_, _, V, hVs, _, _, hVU'⟩ := mem_iInf'.1 hs; ⟨V, hVs, hVU'⟩
#align filter.exists_Inter_of_mem_infi Filter.exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf_of_finite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
(s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i := by
refine ⟨exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun i => mem_iInf_of_mem i (ht i)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_finite Filter.mem_iInf_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
#align filter.le_principal_iff Filter.le_principal_iff
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
#align filter.Iic_principal Filter.Iic_principal
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, iff_self_iff, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_mono Filter.principal_mono
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
#align filter.monotone_principal Filter.monotone_principal
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
#align filter.principal_eq_iff_eq Filter.principal_eq_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
#align filter.join_principal_eq_Sup Filter.join_principal_eq_sSup
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_univ Filter.principal_univ
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
#align filter.principal_empty Filter.principal_empty
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
#align filter.generate_eq_binfi Filter.generate_eq_biInf
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
#align filter.empty_mem_iff_bot Filter.empty_mem_iff_bot
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
#align filter.nonempty_of_mem Filter.nonempty_of_mem
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
#align filter.ne_bot.nonempty_of_mem Filter.NeBot.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
#align filter.empty_not_mem Filter.empty_not_mem
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
#align filter.nonempty_of_ne_bot Filter.nonempty_of_neBot
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
#align filter.compl_not_mem Filter.compl_not_mem
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
#align filter.filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty Filter.filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
#align filter.disjoint_iff Filter.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem Filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.not_disjoint Filter.NeBot.not_disjoint
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
#align filter.inf_eq_bot_iff Filter.inf_eq_bot_iff
theorem _root_.Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {l : ι → Filter α}
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on l)) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on s) := by
have : Pairwise fun i j => ∃ (s : {s // s ∈ l i}) (t : {t // t ∈ l j}), Disjoint s.1 t.1 := by
simpa only [Pairwise, Function.onFun, Filter.disjoint_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists] using hd
choose! s t hst using this
refine ⟨fun i => ⋂ j, @s i j ∩ @t j i, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exacts [iInter_mem.2 fun j => inter_mem (@s i j).2 (@t j i).2,
(hst hij).mono ((iInter_subset _ j).trans inter_subset_left)
((iInter_subset _ i).trans inter_subset_right)]
#align pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter {ι : Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {t : Set ι}
(hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint l) (ht : t.Finite) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ t.PairwiseDisjoint s := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rcases (hd.subtype _ _).exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint with ⟨s, hsl, hsd⟩
lift s to (i : t) → {s // s ∈ l i} using hsl
rcases @Subtype.exists_pi_extension ι (fun i => { s // s ∈ l i }) _ _ s with ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun i => s i, fun i => (s i).2, hsd.set_of_subtype _ _⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.exists_mem_filter Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
#align filter.unique Filter.unique
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
#align filter.eq_top_of_ne_bot Filter.eq_top_of_neBot
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
#align filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot Filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, NeBot.ne <| forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1
fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
#align filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty Filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
#align filter.eq_Inf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans exists_range_iff.symm
#align filter.eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
#align filter.eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_memₓ
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
-- Porting note: it was just `congr_arg filter.sets this.symm`
(congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm).trans <| by simp only
#align filter.infi_sets_eq Filter.iInf_sets_eq
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
#align filter.mem_infi_of_directed Filter.mem_iInf_of_directed
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
#align filter.mem_binfi_of_directed Filter.mem_biInf_of_directed
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
#align filter.binfi_sets_eq Filter.biInf_sets_eq
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset ι, (⨅ i ∈ t, f i).sets := by
rw [iInf_eq_iInf_finset, iInf_sets_eq]
exact directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ => biInf_mono
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite' (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset (PLift ι), (⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i)).sets := by
rw [← iInf_sets_eq_finite, ← Equiv.plift.surjective.iInf_comp, Equiv.plift_apply]
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite' Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite'
theorem mem_iInf_finite {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset ι, s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f i :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite Filter.mem_iInf_finite
theorem mem_iInf_finite' {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset (PLift ι), s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i) :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite' f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite' Filter.mem_iInf_finite'
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
#align filter.sup_join Filter.sup_join
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
#align filter.supr_join Filter.iSup_join
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
-- The dual version does not hold! `Filter α` is not a `CompleteDistribLattice`. -/
instance : Coframe (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := fun f s t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [iInf_subtype']
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_sets_eq_finite, mem_iUnion] at h₂
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₂
rw [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hu
suffices ⨅ i : s, f ⊔ ↑i ≤ f ⊔ u.inf fun i => ↑i from this ⟨h₁, hu⟩
refine Finset.induction_on u (le_sup_of_le_right le_top) ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ u _ ih
rw [Finset.inf_insert, sup_inf_left]
exact le_inf (iInf_le _ _) ih }
theorem mem_iInf_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Filter β} {t : Set β} :
(t ∈ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) ↔ ∃ p : α → Set β, (∀ a ∈ s, p a ∈ f a) ∧ t = ⋂ a ∈ s, p a := by
simp only [← Finset.set_biInter_coe, biInter_eq_iInter, iInf_subtype']
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases (mem_iInf_of_finite _).1 h with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun a => if h : a ∈ s then p ⟨a, h⟩ else univ,
fun a ha => by simpa [ha] using hp ⟨a, ha⟩, ?_⟩
refine iInter_congr_of_surjective id surjective_id ?_
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
simp [ha]
· rintro ⟨p, hpf, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun a => mem_iInf_of_mem a (hpf a a.2)
#align filter.mem_infi_finset Filter.mem_iInf_finset
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed'
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed'
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed'
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iInf_sets_induct {f : ι → Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ iInf f) {p : Set α → Prop}
(uni : p univ) (ins : ∀ {i s₁ s₂}, s₁ ∈ f i → p s₂ → p (s₁ ∩ s₂)) : p s := by
rw [mem_iInf_finite'] at hs
simp only [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨is, his⟩
induction is using Finset.induction_on generalizing s with
| empty => rwa [mem_top.1 his]
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_iff] at his
rcases his with ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩
exact ins hs₁ (ih hs₂)
#align filter.infi_sets_induct Filter.iInf_sets_induct
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
#align filter.inf_principal Filter.inf_principal
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
#align filter.sup_principal Filter.sup_principal
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
#align filter.supr_principal Filter.iSup_principal
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
#align filter.principal_eq_bot_iff Filter.principal_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align filter.principal_ne_bot_iff Filter.principal_neBot_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
#align set.nonempty.principal_ne_bot Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
#align filter.is_compl_principal Filter.isCompl_principal
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal' Filter.mem_inf_principal'
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal Filter.mem_inf_principal
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.supr_inf_principal Filter.iSup_inf_principal
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
#align filter.mem_of_eq_bot Filter.mem_of_eq_bot
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
#align filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl Filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_le_iff Filter.principal_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal_finset {ι : Type w} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs
· simp
· rw [Finset.iInf_insert, Finset.set_biInter_insert, hs, inf_principal]
#align filter.infi_principal_finset Filter.iInf_principal_finset
theorem iInf_principal {ι : Sort w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype (PLift ι)
rw [← iInf_plift_down, ← iInter_plift_down]
simpa using iInf_principal_finset Finset.univ (f <| PLift.down ·)
/-- A special case of `iInf_principal` that is safe to mark `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal' {ι : Type w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) :=
iInf_principal _
#align filter.infi_principal Filter.iInf_principal
theorem iInf_principal_finite {ι : Type w} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
lift s to Finset ι using hs
exact mod_cast iInf_principal_finset s f
#align filter.infi_principal_finite Filter.iInf_principal_finite
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
#align filter.join_mono Filter.join_mono
/-! ### Eventually -/
/-- `f.Eventually p` or `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | p x} ∈ f`. E.g., `∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that `p` holds true for sufficiently large `x`. -/
protected def Eventually (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
{ x | p x } ∈ f
#align filter.eventually Filter.Eventually
@[inherit_doc Filter.Eventually]
notation3 "∀ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p f) => r
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_iff Filter.eventually_iff
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_mem_set Filter.eventually_mem_set
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
#align filter.ext' Filter.ext'
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
#align filter.eventually.filter_mono Filter.Eventually.filter_mono
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
#align filter.eventually_of_mem Filter.eventually_of_mem
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
#align filter.eventually.and Filter.Eventually.and
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
#align filter.eventually_true Filter.eventually_true
theorem eventually_of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
#align filter.eventually_of_forall Filter.eventually_of_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
#align filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot Filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
#align filter.eventually_const Filter.eventually_const
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
#align filter.eventually.exists_mem Filter.Eventually.exists_mem
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
#align filter.eventually.mp Filter.Eventually.mp
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (eventually_of_forall hq)
#align filter.eventually.mono Filter.Eventually.mono
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
#align filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall Filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
#align filter.eventually_and Filter.eventually_and
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
#align filter.eventually.congr Filter.Eventually.congr
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
#align filter.eventually_congr Filter.eventually_congr
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p i x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using iInter_mem
#align filter.eventually_all Filter.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all_finite {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using biInter_mem hI
#align filter.eventually_all_finite Filter.eventually_all_finite
alias _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_all := eventually_all_finite
#align set.finite.eventually_all Set.Finite.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Set.Finite.eventually_all
@[simp] theorem eventually_all_finset {ι} (I : Finset ι) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x :=
I.finite_toSet.eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_all_finset Filter.eventually_all_finset
alias _root_.Finset.eventually_all := eventually_all_finset
#align finset.eventually_all Finset.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Finset.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_left Filter.eventually_or_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_right Filter.eventually_or_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
#align filter.eventually_bot Filter.eventually_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_top Filter.eventually_top
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_sup Filter.eventually_sup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_Sup Filter.eventually_sSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
#align filter.eventually_supr Filter.eventually_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_principal Filter.eventually_principal
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
#align filter.eventually_inf Filter.eventually_inf
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_inf_principal Filter.eventually_inf_principal
/-! ### Frequently -/
/-- `f.Frequently p` or `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`. E.g., `∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that there exist arbitrarily large `x` for which `p` holds true. -/
protected def Frequently (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
¬∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x
#align filter.frequently Filter.Frequently
@[inherit_doc Filter.Frequently]
notation3 "∃ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Frequently p f) => r
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
#align filter.eventually.frequently Filter.Eventually.frequently
theorem frequently_of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (eventually_of_forall h)
#align filter.frequently_of_forall Filter.frequently_of_forall
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
#align filter.frequently.mp Filter.Frequently.mp
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
#align filter.frequently.filter_mono Filter.Frequently.filter_mono
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (eventually_of_forall hpq)
#align filter.frequently.mono Filter.Frequently.mono
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
#align filter.frequently.and_eventually Filter.Frequently.and_eventually
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
#align filter.eventually.and_frequently Filter.Eventually.and_frequently
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := eventually_of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
#align filter.frequently.exists Filter.Frequently.exists
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
#align filter.eventually.exists Filter.Eventually.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp q hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
#align filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and Filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
#align filter.frequently_iff Filter.frequently_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.not_eventually Filter.not_eventually
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
#align filter.not_frequently Filter.not_frequently
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
#align filter.frequently_true_iff_ne_bot Filter.frequently_true_iff_neBot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
#align filter.frequently_false Filter.frequently_false
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align filter.frequently_const Filter.frequently_const
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib Filter.frequently_or_distrib
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_left Filter.frequently_or_distrib_left
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_right Filter.frequently_or_distrib_right
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib Filter.frequently_imp_distrib
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_left Filter.frequently_and_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_right Filter.frequently_and_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_bot Filter.frequently_bot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.frequently_top Filter.frequently_top
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_principal Filter.frequently_principal
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
#align filter.frequently_sup Filter.frequently_sup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
#align filter.frequently_Sup Filter.frequently_sSup
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
#align filter.frequently_supr Filter.frequently_iSup
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
#align filter.eventually.choice Filter.Eventually.choice
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
/-- Two functions `f` and `g` are *eventually equal* along a filter `l` if the set of `x` such that
`f x = g x` belongs to `l`. -/
def EventuallyEq (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x
#align filter.eventually_eq Filter.EventuallyEq
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " =ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyEq l f g
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x :=
h
#align filter.eventually_eq.eventually Filter.EventuallyEq.eventually
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.rw Filter.EventuallyEq.rw
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
#align filter.eventually_eq_set Filter.eventuallyEq_set
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
#align filter.eventually_eq.mem_iff Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_iff
#align filter.eventually.set_eq Filter.Eventually.set_eq
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
#align filter.eventually_eq_univ Filter.eventuallyEq_univ
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
#align filter.eventually_eq.exists_mem Filter.EventuallyEq.exists_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
#align filter.eventually_eq_of_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.filter_mono Filter.EventuallyEq.filter_mono
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.refl Filter.EventuallyEq.refl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_eq.rfl Filter.EventuallyEq.rfl
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.symm Filter.EventuallyEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans Filter.EventuallyEq.trans
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_mk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_mk Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_mk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
#align filter.eventually_eq.fun_comp Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prod_mk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
#align filter.eventually_eq.comp₂ Filter.EventuallyEq.comp₂
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.mul Filter.EventuallyEq.mul
#align filter.eventually_eq.add Filter.EventuallyEq.add
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ):
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_smul Filter.EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.inv Filter.EventuallyEq.inv
#align filter.eventually_eq.neg Filter.EventuallyEq.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.div Filter.EventuallyEq.div
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub Filter.EventuallyEq.sub
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.const_vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.const_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.smul Filter.EventuallyEq.smul
#align filter.eventually_eq.vadd Filter.EventuallyEq.vadd
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Sup β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.sup Filter.EventuallyEq.sup
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Inf β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
#align filter.eventually_eq.inf Filter.EventuallyEq.inf
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
#align filter.eventually_eq.preimage Filter.EventuallyEq.preimage
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.inter Filter.EventuallyEq.inter
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
#align filter.eventually_eq.union Filter.EventuallyEq.union
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
#align filter.eventually_eq.compl Filter.EventuallyEq.compl
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_eq.diff Filter.EventuallyEq.diff
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
#align filter.eventually_eq_empty Filter.eventuallyEq_empty
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_left Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_left
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
#align filter.inter_eventually_eq_right Filter.inter_eventuallyEq_right
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq_principal Filter.eventuallyEq_principal
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_eq_inf_principal_iff Filter.eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.sub_eq Filter.EventuallyEq.sub_eq
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
#align filter.eventually_eq_iff_sub Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_sub
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
/-- A function `f` is eventually less than or equal to a function `g` at a filter `l`. -/
def EventuallyLE (l : Filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x
#align filter.eventually_le Filter.EventuallyLE
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 f " ≤ᶠ[" l:50 "] " g:50 => EventuallyLE l f g
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
#align filter.eventually_le.congr Filter.EventuallyLE.congr
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
#align filter.eventually_le_congr Filter.eventuallyLE_congr
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
#align filter.eventually_eq.le Filter.EventuallyEq.le
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
#align filter.eventually_le.refl Filter.EventuallyLE.refl
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
#align filter.eventually_le.rfl Filter.EventuallyLE.rfl
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
#align filter.eventually_le.trans Filter.EventuallyLE.trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_le Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_le
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
#align filter.eventually_le.trans_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.trans_eq
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
#align filter.eventually_le.antisymm Filter.EventuallyLE.antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
#align filter.eventually_le_antisymm_iff Filter.eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
#align filter.eventually_le.le_iff_eq Filter.EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
#align filter.eventually.ne_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_of_lt
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
#align filter.eventually.ne_top_of_lt Filter.Eventually.ne_top_of_lt
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_of_ne Filter.Eventually.lt_top_of_ne
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
#align filter.eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top Filter.Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.inter Filter.EventuallyLE.inter
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
#align filter.eventually_le.union Filter.EventuallyLE.union
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 hx'; mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hx i hi⟩
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iUnion [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋃ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iUnion fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
protected lemma EventuallyLE.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) ≤ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(eventually_all.2 h).mono fun _x hx hx' ↦ mem_iInter.2 fun i ↦ hx i (mem_iInter.1 hx' i)
protected lemma EventuallyEq.iInter [Finite ι] {s t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) : (⋂ i, s i) =ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.iInter fun i ↦ (h i).le).antisymm <| .iInter fun i ↦ (h i).symm.le
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact .iUnion fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biUnion hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biUnion := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biInter_eq_iInter, biInter_eq_iInter]
exact .iInter fun i ↦ hle i.1 i.2
alias EventuallyLE.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyLE_iInter
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite)
{f g : ι → Set α} (heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
(EventuallyLE.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).le).antisymm <|
.biInter hs fun i hi ↦ (heq i hi).symm.le
alias EventuallyEq.biInter := Set.Finite.eventuallyEq_iInter
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋃ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biUnion s.finite_toSet heq
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyLE_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet hle
lemma _root_.Finset.eventuallyEq_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {f g : ι → Set α}
(heq : ∀ i ∈ s, f i =ᶠ[l] g i) : (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) =ᶠ[l] (⋂ i ∈ s, g i) :=
.biInter s.finite_toSet heq
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
#align filter.eventually_le.compl Filter.EventuallyLE.compl
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
#align filter.eventually_le.diff Filter.EventuallyLE.diff
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_mem_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and_iff, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.set_eventually_le_iff_inf_principal_le Filter.set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
#align filter.set_eventually_eq_iff_inf_principal Filter.set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul [MulZeroClass β] [PartialOrder β] [PosMulMono β] [MulPosMono β]
{l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) (hg₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g₁)
(hf₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg, hg₀, hf₀] with x using _root_.mul_le_mul
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul
@[to_additive EventuallyLE.add_le_add]
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul' [Mul β] [Preorder β] [CovariantClass β β (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
[CovariantClass β β (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β}
(hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.mul_le_mul' hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_le_mul' Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul'
#align filter.eventually_le.add_le_add Filter.EventuallyLE.add_le_add
theorem EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg [OrderedSemiring β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f)
(hg : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g) : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f * g := by filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x using _root_.mul_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_le.mul_nonneg Filter.EventuallyLE.mul_nonneg
theorem eventually_sub_nonneg [OrderedRing β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
0 ≤ᶠ[l] g - f ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_congr <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => sub_nonneg
#align filter.eventually_sub_nonneg Filter.eventually_sub_nonneg
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup Filter.EventuallyLE.sup
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
#align filter.eventually_le.sup_le Filter.EventuallyLE.sup_le
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_left Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
#align filter.eventually_le.le_sup_of_le_right Filter.EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
#align filter.join_le Filter.join_le
/-! ### Push-forwards, pull-backs, and the monad structure -/
section Map
/-- The forward map of a filter -/
def map (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := preimage m ⁻¹' f.sets
univ_sets := univ_mem
sets_of_superset hs st := mem_of_superset hs <| preimage_mono st
inter_sets hs ht := inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.map Filter.map
@[simp]
theorem map_principal {s : Set α} {f : α → β} : map f (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (Set.image f s) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => image_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.map_principal Filter.map_principal
variable {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp]
theorem eventually_map {P : β → Prop} : (∀ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∀ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_map Filter.eventually_map
@[simp]
theorem frequently_map {P : β → Prop} : (∃ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∃ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.frequently_map Filter.frequently_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map : t ∈ map m f ↔ m ⁻¹' t ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map Filter.mem_map
theorem mem_map' : t ∈ map m f ↔ { x | m x ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map' Filter.mem_map'
theorem image_mem_map (hs : s ∈ f) : m '' s ∈ map m f :=
f.sets_of_superset hs <| subset_preimage_image m s
#align filter.image_mem_map Filter.image_mem_map
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Filter.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem image_mem_map_iff (hf : Injective m) : m '' s ∈ map m f ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← preimage_image_eq s hf], image_mem_map⟩
#align filter.image_mem_map_iff Filter.image_mem_map_iff
theorem range_mem_map : range m ∈ map m f := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact image_mem_map univ_mem
#align filter.range_mem_map Filter.range_mem_map
theorem mem_map_iff_exists_image : t ∈ map m f ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, m '' s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun ht => ⟨m ⁻¹' t, ht, image_preimage_subset _ _⟩, fun ⟨_, hs, ht⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (image_mem_map hs) ht⟩
#align filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image Filter.mem_map_iff_exists_image
@[simp]
theorem map_id : Filter.map id f = f :=
filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_id Filter.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : Filter.map (fun x => x) f = f :=
map_id
#align filter.map_id' Filter.map_id'
@[simp]
theorem map_compose : Filter.map m' ∘ Filter.map m = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) :=
funext fun _ => filter_eq <| rfl
#align filter.map_compose Filter.map_compose
@[simp]
theorem map_map : Filter.map m' (Filter.map m f) = Filter.map (m' ∘ m) f :=
congr_fun Filter.map_compose f
#align filter.map_map Filter.map_map
/-- If functions `m₁` and `m₂` are eventually equal at a filter `f`, then
they map this filter to the same filter. -/
theorem map_congr {m₁ m₂ : α → β} {f : Filter α} (h : m₁ =ᶠ[f] m₂) : map m₁ f = map m₂ f :=
Filter.ext' fun _ => eventually_congr (h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl)
#align filter.map_congr Filter.map_congr
end Map
section Comap
/-- The inverse map of a filter. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.comap m f` if either of the following
equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s`. This is used as a definition.
2. The set `kernImage m s = {y | ∀ x, m x = y → x ∈ s}` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap'`.
3. The set `(m '' sᶜ)ᶜ` belongs to `f`, see `Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl` and
`Filter.compl_mem_comap`. -/
def comap (m : α → β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := { s | ∃ t ∈ f, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, by simp only [subset_univ, preimage_univ]⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁, inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂⟩
#align filter.comap Filter.comap
variable {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α}
theorem mem_comap' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ { y | ∀ ⦃x⦄, f x = y → x ∈ s } ∈ l :=
⟨fun ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht fun y hy x hx => hts <| mem_preimage.2 <| by rwa [hx],
fun h => ⟨_, h, fun x hx => hx rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.mem_comap' Filter.mem_comap'
-- TODO: it would be nice to use `kernImage` much more to take advantage of common name and API,
-- and then this would become `mem_comap'`
theorem mem_comap'' : s ∈ comap f l ↔ kernImage f s ∈ l :=
mem_comap'
/-- RHS form is used, e.g., in the definition of `UniformSpace`. -/
lemma mem_comap_prod_mk {x : α} {s : Set β} {F : Filter (α × β)} :
s ∈ comap (Prod.mk x) F ↔ {p : α × β | p.fst = x → p.snd ∈ s} ∈ F := by
simp_rw [mem_comap', Prod.ext_iff, and_imp, @forall_swap β (_ = _), forall_eq, eq_comm]
#align filter.mem_comap_prod_mk Filter.mem_comap_prod_mk
@[simp]
theorem eventually_comap : (∀ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∀ᶠ b in l, ∀ a, f a = b → p a :=
mem_comap'
#align filter.eventually_comap Filter.eventually_comap
@[simp]
theorem frequently_comap : (∃ᶠ a in comap f l, p a) ↔ ∃ᶠ b in l, ∃ a, f a = b ∧ p a := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_comap, not_exists, _root_.not_and]
#align filter.frequently_comap Filter.frequently_comap
theorem mem_comap_iff_compl : s ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ ∈ l := by
simp only [mem_comap'', kernImage_eq_compl]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff_compl Filter.mem_comap_iff_compl
theorem compl_mem_comap : sᶜ ∈ comap f l ↔ (f '' s)ᶜ ∈ l := by rw [mem_comap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
#align filter.compl_mem_comap Filter.compl_mem_comap
end Comap
section KernMap
/-- The analog of `kernImage` for filters. A set `s` belongs to `Filter.kernMap m f` if either of
the following equivalent conditions hold.
1. There exists a set `t ∈ f` such that `s = kernImage m t`. This is used as a definition.
2. There exists a set `t` such that `tᶜ ∈ f` and `sᶜ = m '' t`, see `Filter.mem_kernMap_iff_compl`
and `Filter.compl_mem_kernMap`.
This definition because it gives a right adjoint to `Filter.comap`, and because it has a nice
interpretation when working with `co-` filters (`Filter.cocompact`, `Filter.cofinite`, ...).
For example, `kernMap m (cocompact α)` is the filter generated by the complements of the sets
`m '' K` where `K` is a compact subset of `α`. -/
def kernMap (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := (kernImage m) '' f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨univ, f.univ_sets, by simp [kernImage_eq_compl]⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro _ t ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩ hst
refine ⟨s ∪ m ⁻¹' t, mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [kernImage_union_preimage, union_eq_right.mpr hst]
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨s₁, h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁ ∩ s₂, f.inter_sets h₁ h₂, Set.preimage_kernImage.u_inf⟩
variable {m : α → β} {f : Filter α}
theorem mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, kernImage m t = s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_kernMap_iff_compl {s : Set β} : s ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = sᶜ := by
rw [mem_kernMap, compl_surjective.exists]
refine exists_congr (fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦ ?_)
rw [kernImage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm]
theorem compl_mem_kernMap {s : Set β} : sᶜ ∈ kernMap m f ↔ ∃ t, tᶜ ∈ f ∧ m '' t = s := by
simp_rw [mem_kernMap_iff_compl, compl_compl]
end KernMap
/-- The monadic bind operation on filter is defined the usual way in terms of `map` and `join`.
Unfortunately, this `bind` does not result in the expected applicative. See `Filter.seq` for the
applicative instance. -/
def bind (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : Filter β :=
join (map m f)
#align filter.bind Filter.bind
/-- The applicative sequentiation operation. This is not induced by the bind operation. -/
def seq (f : Filter (α → β)) (g : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := { s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ m ∈ u, ∀ x ∈ t, (m : α → β) x ∈ s }
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, univ, univ_mem, fun _ _ _ _ => trivial⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, h⟩ hst =>
⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, fun _ hx _ hy => hst <| h _ hx _ hy⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨t₀, ht₀, t₁, ht₁, ht⟩ ⟨u₀, hu₀, u₁, hu₁, hu⟩ =>
⟨t₀ ∩ u₀, inter_mem ht₀ hu₀, t₁ ∩ u₁, inter_mem ht₁ hu₁, fun _ ⟨hx₀, hx₁⟩ _ ⟨hy₀, hy₁⟩ =>
⟨ht _ hx₀ _ hy₀, hu _ hx₁ _ hy₁⟩⟩
#align filter.seq Filter.seq
/-- `pure x` is the set of sets that contain `x`. It is equal to `𝓟 {x}` but
with this definition we have `s ∈ pure a` defeq `a ∈ s`. -/
instance : Pure Filter :=
⟨fun x =>
{ sets := { s | x ∈ s }
inter_sets := And.intro
sets_of_superset := fun hs hst => hst hs
univ_sets := trivial }⟩
instance : Bind Filter :=
⟨@Filter.bind⟩
instance : Functor Filter where map := @Filter.map
instance : LawfulFunctor (Filter : Type u → Type u) where
id_map _ := map_id
comp_map _ _ _ := map_map.symm
map_const := rfl
theorem pure_sets (a : α) : (pure a : Filter α).sets = { s | a ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align filter.pure_sets Filter.pure_sets
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ (pure a : Filter α) ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_pure Filter.mem_pure
@[simp]
theorem eventually_pure {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in pure a, p x) ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_pure Filter.eventually_pure
@[simp]
theorem principal_singleton (a : α) : 𝓟 {a} = pure a :=
Filter.ext fun s => by simp only [mem_pure, mem_principal, singleton_subset_iff]
#align filter.principal_singleton Filter.principal_singleton
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
#align filter.map_pure Filter.map_pure
theorem pure_le_principal (a : α) : pure a ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp
@[simp] theorem join_pure (f : Filter α) : join (pure f) = f := rfl
#align filter.join_pure Filter.join_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_bind (a : α) (m : α → Filter β) : bind (pure a) m = m a := by
simp only [Bind.bind, bind, map_pure, join_pure]
#align filter.pure_bind Filter.pure_bind
theorem map_bind {α β} (m : β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : α → Filter β) :
map m (bind f g) = bind f (map m ∘ g) :=
rfl
theorem bind_map {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) (g : β → Filter γ) :
(bind (map m f) g) = bind f (g ∘ m) :=
rfl
/-!
### `Filter` as a `Monad`
In this section we define `Filter.monad`, a `Monad` structure on `Filter`s. This definition is not
an instance because its `Seq` projection is not equal to the `Filter.seq` function we use in the
`Applicative` instance on `Filter`.
-/
section
/-- The monad structure on filters. -/
protected def monad : Monad Filter where map := @Filter.map
#align filter.monad Filter.monad
attribute [local instance] Filter.monad
protected theorem lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad Filter where
map_const := rfl
id_map _ := rfl
seqLeft_eq _ _ := rfl
seqRight_eq _ _ := rfl
pure_seq _ _ := rfl
bind_pure_comp _ _ := rfl
bind_map _ _ := rfl
pure_bind _ _ := rfl
bind_assoc _ _ _ := rfl
#align filter.is_lawful_monad Filter.lawfulMonad
end
instance : Alternative Filter where
seq := fun x y => x.seq (y ())
failure := ⊥
orElse x y := x ⊔ y ()
@[simp]
theorem map_def {α β} (m : α → β) (f : Filter α) : m <$> f = map m f :=
rfl
#align filter.map_def Filter.map_def
@[simp]
theorem bind_def {α β} (f : Filter α) (m : α → Filter β) : f >>= m = bind f m :=
rfl
#align filter.bind_def Filter.bind_def
/-! #### `map` and `comap` equations -/
section Map
variable {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
@[simp] theorem mem_comap : s ∈ comap m g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_comap Filter.mem_comap
theorem preimage_mem_comap (ht : t ∈ g) : m ⁻¹' t ∈ comap m g :=
⟨t, ht, Subset.rfl⟩
#align filter.preimage_mem_comap Filter.preimage_mem_comap
theorem Eventually.comap {p : β → Prop} (hf : ∀ᶠ b in g, p b) (f : α → β) :
∀ᶠ a in comap f g, p (f a) :=
preimage_mem_comap hf
#align filter.eventually.comap Filter.Eventually.comap
theorem comap_id : comap id f = f :=
le_antisymm (fun _ => preimage_mem_comap) fun _ ⟨_, ht, hst⟩ => mem_of_superset ht hst
#align filter.comap_id Filter.comap_id
theorem comap_id' : comap (fun x => x) f = f := comap_id
#align filter.comap_id' Filter.comap_id'
theorem comap_const_of_not_mem {x : β} (ht : t ∈ g) (hx : x ∉ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| mem_comap'.2 <| mem_of_superset ht fun _ hx' _ h => hx <| h.symm ▸ hx'
#align filter.comap_const_of_not_mem Filter.comap_const_of_not_mem
theorem comap_const_of_mem {x : β} (h : ∀ t ∈ g, x ∈ t) : comap (fun _ : α => x) g = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ hs => univ_mem' fun _ => h _ (mem_comap'.1 hs) rfl
#align filter.comap_const_of_mem Filter.comap_const_of_mem
theorem map_const [NeBot f] {c : β} : (f.map fun _ => c) = pure c := by
ext s
by_cases h : c ∈ s <;> simp [h]
#align filter.map_const Filter.map_const
theorem comap_comap {m : γ → β} {n : β → α} : comap m (comap n f) = comap (n ∘ m) f :=
Filter.coext fun s => by simp only [compl_mem_comap, image_image, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.comap_comap Filter.comap_comap
section comm
/-!
The variables in the following lemmas are used as in this diagram:
```
φ
α → β
θ ↓ ↓ ψ
γ → δ
ρ
```
-/
variable {φ : α → β} {θ : α → γ} {ψ : β → δ} {ρ : γ → δ} (H : ψ ∘ φ = ρ ∘ θ)
theorem map_comm (F : Filter α) : map ψ (map φ F) = map ρ (map θ F) := by
rw [Filter.map_map, H, ← Filter.map_map]
#align filter.map_comm Filter.map_comm
theorem comap_comm (G : Filter δ) : comap φ (comap ψ G) = comap θ (comap ρ G) := by
rw [Filter.comap_comap, H, ← Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_comm Filter.comap_comm
end comm
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_map {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) :=
map_comm h.comp_eq
#align function.semiconj.filter_map Function.Semiconj.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_map {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_map
#align function.commute.filter_map Function.Commute.filter_map
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.filter_comap {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (comap f) (comap gb) (comap ga) :=
comap_comm h.comp_eq.symm
#align function.semiconj.filter_comap Function.Semiconj.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.filter_comap {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (comap f) (comap g) :=
h.semiconj.filter_comap
#align function.commute.filter_comap Function.Commute.filter_comap
section
open Filter
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
LeftInverse (map g) (map f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [map_map, hfg.comp_eq_id, map_id]
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInverse g f) :
RightInverse (comap g) (comap f) := fun F ↦ by
rw [comap_comap, hfg.comp_eq_id, comap_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : RightInverse (map g) (map f) :=
hfg.filter_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.filter_comap {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInverse g f) : LeftInverse (comap g) (comap f) :=
hfg.filter_comap
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hfg : LeftInvOn g f s) :
LeftInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 s) := fun F (hF : F ≤ 𝓟 s) ↦ by
have : (g ∘ f) =ᶠ[𝓟 s] id := by simpa only [eventuallyEq_principal] using hfg
rw [map_map, map_congr (this.filter_mono hF), map_id]
nonrec theorem _root_.Set.RightInvOn.filter_map_Iic {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hfg : RightInvOn g f t) : RightInvOn (map g) (map f) (Iic <| 𝓟 t) :=
hfg.filter_map_Iic
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_principal {t : Set β} : comap m (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' t) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_u, hu, b⟩ => (preimage_mono hu).trans b,
fun h => ⟨t, Subset.rfl, h⟩⟩
#align filter.comap_principal Filter.comap_principal
theorem principal_subtype {α : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set s) :
𝓟 t = comap (↑) (𝓟 (((↑) : s → α) '' t)) := by
rw [comap_principal, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.coe_injective]
#align principal_subtype Filter.principal_subtype
@[simp]
theorem comap_pure {b : β} : comap m (pure b) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [← principal_singleton, comap_principal]
#align filter.comap_pure Filter.comap_pure
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map m f ≤ g ↔ f ≤ comap m g :=
⟨fun h _ ⟨_, ht, hts⟩ => mem_of_superset (h ht) hts, fun h _ ht => h ⟨_, ht, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.map_le_iff_le_comap Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (map m) (comap m) :=
fun _ _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align filter.gc_map_comap Filter.gc_map_comap
theorem comap_le_iff_le_kernMap : comap m g ≤ f ↔ g ≤ kernMap m f := by
simp [Filter.le_def, mem_comap'', mem_kernMap, -mem_comap]
theorem gc_comap_kernMap (m : α → β) : GaloisConnection (comap m) (kernMap m) :=
fun _ _ ↦ comap_le_iff_le_kernMap
theorem kernMap_principal {s : Set α} : kernMap m (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (kernImage m s) := by
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (fun g ↦ ?_)
rw [← comap_le_iff_le_kernMap, le_principal_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_comap'']
@[mono]
theorem map_mono : Monotone (map m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_l
#align filter.map_mono Filter.map_mono
@[mono]
theorem comap_mono : Monotone (comap m) :=
(gc_map_comap m).monotone_u
#align filter.comap_mono Filter.comap_mono
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem map_le_map (h : F ≤ G) : map m F ≤ map m G := map_mono h
/-- Temporary lemma that we can tag with `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr, deprecated] theorem comap_le_comap (h : F ≤ G) : comap m F ≤ comap m G := comap_mono h
@[simp] theorem map_bot : map m ⊥ = ⊥ := (gc_map_comap m).l_bot
#align filter.map_bot Filter.map_bot
@[simp] theorem map_sup : map m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) = map m f₁ ⊔ map m f₂ := (gc_map_comap m).l_sup
#align filter.map_sup Filter.map_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {f : ι → Filter α} : map m (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, map m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_iSup
#align filter.map_supr Filter.map_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top (f : α → β) : map f ⊤ = 𝓟 (range f) := by
rw [← principal_univ, map_principal, image_univ]
#align filter.map_top Filter.map_top
@[simp] theorem comap_top : comap m ⊤ = ⊤ := (gc_map_comap m).u_top
#align filter.comap_top Filter.comap_top
@[simp] theorem comap_inf : comap m (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊓ comap m g₂ := (gc_map_comap m).u_inf
#align filter.comap_inf Filter.comap_inf
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf {f : ι → Filter β} : comap m (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_map_comap m).u_iInf
#align filter.comap_infi Filter.comap_iInf
theorem le_comap_top (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) : l ≤ comap f ⊤ := by
rw [comap_top]
exact le_top
#align filter.le_comap_top Filter.le_comap_top
theorem map_comap_le : map m (comap m g) ≤ g :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_u_le _
#align filter.map_comap_le Filter.map_comap_le
theorem le_comap_map : f ≤ comap m (map m f) :=
(gc_map_comap m).le_u_l _
#align filter.le_comap_map Filter.le_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : comap m ⊥ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp only [empty_subset, preimage_empty]⟩
#align filter.comap_bot Filter.comap_bot
theorem neBot_of_comap (h : (comap m g).NeBot) : g.NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff] at *
contrapose! h
rw [h]
exact comap_bot
#align filter.ne_bot_of_comap Filter.neBot_of_comap
theorem comap_inf_principal_range : comap m (g ⊓ 𝓟 (range m)) = comap m g := by
simp
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_range Filter.comap_inf_principal_range
theorem disjoint_comap (h : Disjoint g₁ g₂) : Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, h.eq_bot, comap_bot]
#align filter.disjoint_comap Filter.disjoint_comap
theorem comap_iSup {ι} {f : ι → Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m (iSup f) = ⨆ i, comap m (f i) :=
(gc_comap_kernMap m).l_iSup
#align filter.comap_supr Filter.comap_iSup
theorem comap_sSup {s : Set (Filter β)} {m : α → β} : comap m (sSup s) = ⨆ f ∈ s, comap m f := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.comap_Sup Filter.comap_sSup
theorem comap_sup : comap m (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊔ comap m g₂ := by
rw [sup_eq_iSup, comap_iSup, iSup_bool_eq, Bool.cond_true, Bool.cond_false]
#align filter.comap_sup Filter.comap_sup
theorem map_comap (f : Filter β) (m : α → β) : (f.comap m).map m = f ⊓ 𝓟 (range m) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_inf map_comap_le <| le_principal_iff.2 range_mem_map) ?_
rintro t' ⟨t, ht, sub⟩
refine mem_inf_principal.2 (mem_of_superset ht ?_)
rintro _ hxt ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact sub hxt
#align filter.map_comap Filter.map_comap
theorem map_comap_setCoe_val (f : Filter β) (s : Set β) :
(f.comap ((↑) : s → β)).map (↑) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_comap_of_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) : (f.comap m).map m = f := by
rw [map_comap, inf_eq_left.2 (le_principal_iff.2 hf)]
#align filter.map_comap_of_mem Filter.map_comap_of_mem
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Filter α) (Filter β) (map c) fun f => ∀ᶠ x : α in f, p x where
prf f hf := ⟨comap c f, map_comap_of_mem <| hf.mono CanLift.prf⟩
#align filter.can_lift Filter.canLift
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f g : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) :
comap m f ≤ comap m g ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => map_comap_of_mem hf ▸ (map_mono h).trans map_comap_le, fun h => comap_mono h⟩
#align filter.comap_le_comap_iff Filter.comap_le_comap_iff
theorem map_comap_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (l : Filter β) :
map f (comap f l) = l :=
map_comap_of_mem <| by simp only [hf.range_eq, univ_mem]
#align filter.map_comap_of_surjective Filter.map_comap_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (comap f) :=
LeftInverse.injective <| map_comap_of_surjective hf
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.filter_map_top {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(congr_arg _ comap_top).symm.trans <| map_comap_of_surjective hf ⊤
#align function.surjective.filter_map_top Function.Surjective.filter_map_top
theorem subtype_coe_map_comap (s : Set α) (f : Filter α) :
map ((↑) : s → α) (comap ((↑) : s → α) f) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s := by rw [map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
#align filter.subtype_coe_map_comap Filter.subtype_coe_map_comap
theorem image_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {c : β → α} (h : range c ∈ f) {W : Set β}
(W_in : W ∈ comap c f) : c '' W ∈ f := by
rw [← map_comap_of_mem h]
exact image_mem_map W_in
#align filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap {f : Filter α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ f) {W : Set U}
(W_in : W ∈ comap ((↑) : U → α) f) : (↑) '' W ∈ f :=
image_mem_of_mem_comap (by simp [h]) W_in
#align filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap Filter.image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap
theorem comap_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) : comap m (map m f) = f :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
mem_of_superset (preimage_mem_comap <| image_mem_map hs) <| by
simp only [preimage_image_eq s h, Subset.rfl])
le_comap_map
#align filter.comap_map Filter.comap_map
theorem mem_comap_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (inj : Injective m) (large : Set.range m ∈ f)
{S : Set α} : S ∈ comap m f ↔ m '' S ∈ f := by
rw [← image_mem_map_iff inj, map_comap_of_mem large]
#align filter.mem_comap_iff Filter.mem_comap_iff
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injOn {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : s ∈ l₁)
(h₂ : s ∈ l₂) (hinj : InjOn f s) : map f l₁ ≤ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂ :=
⟨fun h _t ht =>
mp_mem h₁ <|
mem_of_superset (h <| image_mem_map (inter_mem h₂ ht)) fun _y ⟨_x, ⟨hxs, hxt⟩, hxy⟩ hys =>
hinj hxs hys hxy ▸ hxt,
fun h => map_mono h⟩
#align filter.map_le_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_le_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_le_map_iff {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) :
map m f ≤ map m g ↔ f ≤ g := by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map hm]
#align filter.map_le_map_iff Filter.map_le_map_iff
theorem map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {s : Set α} (hsf : s ∈ f) (hsg : s ∈ g)
(hm : InjOn m s) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsf hsg hm,
map_le_map_iff_of_injOn hsg hsf hm]
#align filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_inj_on Filter.map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn
theorem map_inj {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : map m f = map m g ↔ f = g :=
map_eq_map_iff_of_injOn univ_mem univ_mem hm.injOn
#align filter.map_inj Filter.map_inj
theorem map_injective {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) : Injective (map m) := fun _ _ =>
(map_inj hm).1
#align filter.map_injective Filter.map_injective
theorem comap_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t := by
simp only [← forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot, mem_comap, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
exact ⟨fun h t t_in => h (m ⁻¹' t) t t_in Subset.rfl, fun h s t ht hst => (h t ht).imp hst⟩
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_neBot_iff
theorem comap_neBot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff.mpr hm
#align filter.comap_ne_bot Filter.comap_neBot
theorem comap_neBot_iff_frequently {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in f, y ∈ range m := by
simp only [comap_neBot_iff, frequently_iff, mem_range, @and_comm (_ ∈ _), exists_exists_eq_and]
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently Filter.comap_neBot_iff_frequently
theorem comap_neBot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} :
NeBot (comap m f) ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∉ f :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently
#align filter.comap_ne_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} : comap m f = ⊥ ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∈ f :=
not_iff_not.mp <| neBot_iff.symm.trans comap_neBot_iff_compl_range
#align filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range Filter.comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range
theorem comap_surjective_eq_bot {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : Surjective m) :
comap m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ := by
rw [comap_eq_bot_iff_compl_range, hm.range_eq, compl_univ, empty_mem_iff_bot]
#align filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot Filter.comap_surjective_eq_bot
theorem disjoint_comap_iff (h : Surjective m) :
Disjoint (comap m g₁) (comap m g₂) ↔ Disjoint g₁ g₂ := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← comap_inf, comap_surjective_eq_bot h]
#align filter.disjoint_comap_iff Filter.disjoint_comap_iff
theorem NeBot.comap_of_range_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (_ : NeBot f) (hm : range m ∈ f) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
comap_neBot_iff_frequently.2 <| Eventually.frequently hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_range_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_range_mem
@[simp]
theorem comap_fst_neBot_iff {f : Filter α} :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ Nonempty β := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp [*]
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_fst_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_fst_neBot [Nonempty β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.fst : α × β → α)).NeBot :=
comap_fst_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_fst_ne_bot Filter.comap_fst_neBot
@[simp]
theorem comap_snd_neBot_iff {f : Filter β} :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot ↔ Nonempty α ∧ f.NeBot := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; simp
· simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, hα]
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_snd_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_snd_neBot [Nonempty α] {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] :
(f.comap (Prod.snd : α × β → β)).NeBot :=
comap_snd_neBot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
#align filter.comap_snd_ne_bot Filter.comap_snd_neBot
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {i : ι} {f : Filter (α i)} :
(comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ (∀ j, Nonempty (α j)) ∧ NeBot f := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty (∀ j, α j) with H H
· rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]
simp [← Classical.nonempty_pi]
· have : ∀ j, Nonempty (α j) := Classical.nonempty_pi.1 H
simp [comap_neBot_iff_frequently, *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff' Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff'
@[simp]
theorem comap_eval_neBot_iff {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] {i : ι}
{f : Filter (α i)} : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot ↔ NeBot f := by simp [comap_eval_neBot_iff', *]
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot_iff Filter.comap_eval_neBot_iff
@[instance]
theorem comap_eval_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, Nonempty (α j)] (i : ι)
(f : Filter (α i)) [NeBot f] : (comap (eval i) f).NeBot :=
comap_eval_neBot_iff.2 ‹_›
#align filter.comap_eval_ne_bot Filter.comap_eval_neBot
theorem comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := by
refine ⟨compl_compl s ▸ mt mem_of_eq_bot ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
rcases hf.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hs ht) with ⟨_, ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩, hxt⟩
exact absurd hxs (hts hxt)
#align filter.comap_inf_principal_ne_bot_of_image_mem Filter.comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem
theorem comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal {s : Set γ} {l : Filter γ} [h : NeBot l] (h' : l ≤ 𝓟 s) :
NeBot (comap ((↑) : s → γ) l) :=
h.comap_of_range_mem <| (@Subtype.range_coe γ s).symm ▸ h' (mem_principal_self s)
#align filter.comap_coe_ne_bot_of_le_principal Filter.comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal
theorem NeBot.comap_of_surj {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) (hm : Surjective m) :
NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| univ_mem' hm
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_surj Filter.NeBot.comap_of_surj
theorem NeBot.comap_of_image_mem {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α}
(hs : m '' s ∈ f) : NeBot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem <| mem_of_superset hs (image_subset_range _ _)
#align filter.ne_bot.comap_of_image_mem Filter.NeBot.comap_of_image_mem
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff : map m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot]
exact id, fun h => by simp only [h, map_bot]⟩
#align filter.map_eq_bot_iff Filter.map_eq_bot_iff
theorem map_neBot_iff (f : α → β) {F : Filter α} : NeBot (map f F) ↔ NeBot F := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.map_ne_bot_iff Filter.map_neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.map (hf : NeBot f) (m : α → β) : NeBot (map m f) :=
(map_neBot_iff m).2 hf
#align filter.ne_bot.map Filter.NeBot.map
theorem NeBot.of_map : NeBot (f.map m) → NeBot f :=
(map_neBot_iff m).1
#align filter.ne_bot.of_map Filter.NeBot.of_map
instance map_neBot [hf : NeBot f] : NeBot (f.map m) :=
hf.map m
#align filter.map_ne_bot Filter.map_neBot
theorem sInter_comap_sets (f : α → β) (F : Filter β) : ⋂₀ (comap f F).sets = ⋂ U ∈ F, f ⁻¹' U := by
ext x
suffices (∀ (A : Set α) (B : Set β), B ∈ F → f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A → x ∈ A) ↔
∀ B : Set β, B ∈ F → f x ∈ B by
simp only [mem_sInter, mem_iInter, Filter.mem_sets, mem_comap, this, and_imp, exists_prop,
mem_preimage, exists_imp]
constructor
· intro h U U_in
simpa only [Subset.rfl, forall_prop_of_true, mem_preimage] using h (f ⁻¹' U) U U_in
· intro h V U U_in f_U_V
exact f_U_V (h U U_in)
#align filter.sInter_comap_sets Filter.sInter_comap_sets
end Map
-- this is a generic rule for monotone functions:
theorem map_iInf_le {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (iInf f) ≤ ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => map_mono <| iInf_le _ _
#align filter.map_infi_le Filter.map_iInf_le
theorem map_iInf_eq {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] :
map m (iInf f) = ⨅ i, map m (f i) :=
map_iInf_le.antisymm fun s (hs : m ⁻¹' s ∈ iInf f) =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := (mem_iInf_of_directed hf _).1 hs
have : ⨅ i, map m (f i) ≤ 𝓟 s :=
iInf_le_of_le i <| by simpa only [le_principal_iff, mem_map]
Filter.le_principal_iff.1 this
#align filter.map_infi_eq Filter.map_iInf_eq
theorem map_biInf_eq {ι : Type w} {f : ι → Filter α} {m : α → β} {p : ι → Prop}
(h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) { x | p x }) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
map m (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), map m (f i) := by
haveI := nonempty_subtype.2 ne
simp only [iInf_subtype']
exact map_iInf_eq h.directed_val
#align filter.map_binfi_eq Filter.map_biInf_eq
theorem map_inf_le {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (f ⊓ g) ≤ map m f ⊓ map m g :=
(@map_mono _ _ m).map_inf_le f g
#align filter.map_inf_le Filter.map_inf_le
theorem map_inf {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} (h : Injective m) :
map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
refine map_inf_le.antisymm ?_
rintro t ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, ht : m ⁻¹' t = s₁ ∩ s₂⟩
refine mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂) ?_
rw [← image_inter h, image_subset_iff, ht]
#align filter.map_inf Filter.map_inf
theorem map_inf' {f g : Filter α} {m : α → β} {t : Set α} (htf : t ∈ f) (htg : t ∈ g)
(h : InjOn m t) : map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g := by
lift f to Filter t using htf; lift g to Filter t using htg
replace h : Injective (m ∘ ((↑) : t → α)) := h.injective
simp only [map_map, ← map_inf Subtype.coe_injective, map_inf h]
#align filter.map_inf' Filter.map_inf'
lemma disjoint_of_map {α β : Type*} {F G : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : Disjoint (map f F) (map f G)) : Disjoint F G :=
disjoint_iff.mpr <| map_eq_bot_iff.mp <| le_bot_iff.mp <| trans map_inf_le (disjoint_iff.mp h)
theorem disjoint_map {m : α → β} (hm : Injective m) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} :
Disjoint (map m f₁) (map m f₂) ↔ Disjoint f₁ f₂ := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← map_inf hm, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.disjoint_map Filter.disjoint_map
theorem map_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter β) : map e.symm f = comap e f :=
map_injective e.injective <| by
rw [map_map, e.self_comp_symm, map_id, map_comap_of_surjective e.surjective]
#align filter.map_equiv_symm Filter.map_equiv_symm
theorem map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {n : β → α} (h₁ : m ∘ n = id)
(h₂ : n ∘ m = id) : map m f = comap n f :=
map_equiv_symm ⟨n, m, congr_fun h₁, congr_fun h₂⟩ f
#align filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse Filter.map_eq_comap_of_inverse
theorem comap_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : Filter α) : comap e.symm f = map e f :=
(map_eq_comap_of_inverse e.self_comp_symm e.symm_comp_self).symm
#align filter.comap_equiv_symm Filter.comap_equiv_symm
theorem map_swap_eq_comap_swap {f : Filter (α × β)} : Prod.swap <$> f = comap Prod.swap f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse Prod.swap_swap_eq Prod.swap_swap_eq
#align filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap Filter.map_swap_eq_comap_swap
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_eq_comap {f : Filter ((α × β) × γ × δ)} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f =
comap (fun p : (α × γ) × β × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl) (funext fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl)
#align filter.map_swap4_eq_comap Filter.map_swap4_eq_comap
theorem le_map {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} (h : ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g) : g ≤ f.map m :=
fun _ hs => mem_of_superset (h _ hs) <| image_preimage_subset _ _
#align filter.le_map Filter.le_map
theorem le_map_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} {g : Filter β} : g ≤ f.map m ↔ ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g :=
⟨fun h _ hs => h (image_mem_map hs), le_map⟩
#align filter.le_map_iff Filter.le_map_iff
protected theorem push_pull (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) = map f F ⊓ G := by
apply le_antisymm
· calc
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) ≤ map f F ⊓ (map f <| comap f G) := map_inf_le
_ ≤ map f F ⊓ G := inf_le_inf_left (map f F) map_comap_le
· rintro U ⟨V, V_in, W, ⟨Z, Z_in, hZ⟩, h⟩
apply mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map V_in) Z_in
calc
f '' V ∩ Z = f '' (V ∩ f ⁻¹' Z) := by rw [image_inter_preimage]
_ ⊆ f '' (V ∩ W) := image_subset _ (inter_subset_inter_right _ ‹_›)
_ = f '' (f ⁻¹' U) := by rw [h]
_ ⊆ U := image_preimage_subset f U
#align filter.push_pull Filter.push_pull
protected theorem push_pull' (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
map f (comap f G ⊓ F) = G ⊓ map f F := by simp only [Filter.push_pull, inf_comm]
#align filter.push_pull' Filter.push_pull'
theorem principal_eq_map_coe_top (s : Set α) : 𝓟 s = map ((↑) : s → α) ⊤ := by simp
#align filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top Filter.principal_eq_map_coe_top
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
F ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ comap ((↑) : s → α) F = ⊥ := by
rw [principal_eq_map_coe_top s, ← Filter.push_pull', inf_top_eq, map_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap
section Applicative
theorem singleton_mem_pure {a : α} : {a} ∈ (pure a : Filter α) :=
mem_singleton a
#align filter.singleton_mem_pure Filter.singleton_mem_pure
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → Filter α) := fun a _ hab =>
(Filter.ext_iff.1 hab { x | a = x }).1 rfl
#align filter.pure_injective Filter.pure_injective
instance pure_neBot {α : Type u} {a : α} : NeBot (pure a) :=
⟨mt empty_mem_iff_bot.2 <| not_mem_empty a⟩
#align filter.pure_ne_bot Filter.pure_neBot
@[simp]
theorem le_pure_iff {f : Filter α} {a : α} : f ≤ pure a ↔ {a} ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_singleton, le_principal_iff]
#align filter.le_pure_iff Filter.le_pure_iff
theorem mem_seq_def {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, (x : α → β) y ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_seq_def Filter.mem_seq_def
theorem mem_seq_iff {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Set.seq u t ⊆ s := by
simp only [mem_seq_def, seq_subset, exists_prop, iff_self_iff]
#align filter.mem_seq_iff Filter.mem_seq_iff
theorem mem_map_seq_iff {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {m : α → β → γ} {s : Set γ} :
s ∈ (f.map m).seq g ↔ ∃ t u, t ∈ g ∧ u ∈ f ∧ ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, m x y ∈ s :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hts⟩ => ⟨s, m ⁻¹' t, hs, ht, fun _ => hts _⟩)
fun ⟨t, s, ht, hs, hts⟩ =>
⟨m '' s, image_mem_map hs, t, ht, fun _ ⟨_, has, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ hts _ has⟩
#align filter.mem_map_seq_iff Filter.mem_map_seq_iff
theorem seq_mem_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : s.seq t ∈ f.seq g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun f hf a ha => ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.seq_mem_seq Filter.seq_mem_seq
theorem le_seq {f : Filter (α → β)} {g : Filter α} {h : Filter β}
(hh : ∀ t ∈ f, ∀ u ∈ g, Set.seq t u ∈ h) : h ≤ seq f g := fun _ ⟨_, ht, _, hu, hs⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hh _ ht _ hu) fun _ ⟨_, hm, _, ha, eq⟩ => eq ▸ hs _ hm _ ha
#align filter.le_seq Filter.le_seq
@[mono]
theorem seq_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (α → β)} {g₁ g₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.seq g₁ ≤ f₂.seq g₂ :=
le_seq fun _ hs _ ht => seq_mem_seq (hf hs) (hg ht)
#align filter.seq_mono Filter.seq_mono
@[simp]
theorem pure_seq_eq_map (g : α → β) (f : Filter α) : seq (pure g) f = f.map g := by
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← singleton_seq]
apply seq_mem_seq _ hs
exact singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map g f) (image_mem_map ht) ?_
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align filter.pure_seq_eq_map Filter.pure_seq_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem seq_pure (f : Filter (α → β)) (a : α) : seq f (pure a) = map (fun g : α → β => g a) f := by
refine le_antisymm (le_map fun s hs => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rw [← seq_singleton]
exact seq_mem_seq hs singleton_mem_pure
· refine sets_of_superset (map (fun g : α → β => g a) f) (image_mem_map hs) ?_
rintro b ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g, hg, a, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.seq_pure Filter.seq_pure
@[simp]
theorem seq_assoc (x : Filter α) (g : Filter (α → β)) (h : Filter (β → γ)) :
seq h (seq g x) = seq (seq (map (· ∘ ·) h) g) x := by
refine le_antisymm (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rcases mem_seq_iff.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, hs⟩
rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hu with ⟨w, hw, hu⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono ((Set.seq_mono hu Subset.rfl).trans hs) Subset.rfl)
rw [← Set.seq_seq]
exact seq_mem_seq hw (seq_mem_seq hv ht)
· rcases mem_seq_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, ht⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono Subset.rfl ht)
rw [Set.seq_seq]
exact seq_mem_seq (seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map hs) hu) hv
#align filter.seq_assoc Filter.seq_assoc
theorem prod_map_seq_comm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
(map Prod.mk f).seq g = seq (map (fun b a => (a, b)) g) f := by
refine le_antisymm (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_) (le_seq fun s hs t ht => ?_)
· rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono hs Subset.rfl)
rw [← Set.prod_image_seq_comm]
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu
· rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (Set.seq_mono hs Subset.rfl)
rw [Set.prod_image_seq_comm]
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu
#align filter.prod_map_seq_comm Filter.prod_map_seq_comm
theorem seq_eq_filter_seq {α β : Type u} (f : Filter (α → β)) (g : Filter α) :
f <*> g = seq f g :=
rfl
#align filter.seq_eq_filter_seq Filter.seq_eq_filter_seq
instance : LawfulApplicative (Filter : Type u → Type u) where
map_pure := map_pure
seqLeft_eq _ _ := rfl
seqRight_eq _ _ := rfl
seq_pure := seq_pure
pure_seq := pure_seq_eq_map
seq_assoc := seq_assoc
instance : CommApplicative (Filter : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨fun f g => prod_map_seq_comm f g⟩
end Applicative
/-! #### `bind` equations -/
section Bind
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bind {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in bind f m, p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ᶠ y in m x, p y :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_bind Filter.eventually_bind
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_bind {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ =ᶠ[bind f m] g₂ ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ =ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq_bind Filter.eventuallyEq_bind
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyLE_bind [LE γ] {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ≤ᶠ[bind f m] g₂ ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ ≤ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_le_bind Filter.eventuallyLE_bind
theorem mem_bind' {s : Set β} {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ { a | s ∈ m a } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_bind' Filter.mem_bind'
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {s : Set β} {f : Filter α} {m : α → Filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x :=
calc
s ∈ bind f m ↔ { a | s ∈ m a } ∈ f := Iff.rfl
_ ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ { a | s ∈ m a } := exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
_ ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_bind Filter.mem_bind
theorem bind_le {f : Filter α} {g : α → Filter β} {l : Filter β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, g x ≤ l) :
f.bind g ≤ l :=
join_le <| eventually_map.2 h
#align filter.bind_le Filter.bind_le
@[mono]
theorem bind_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : α → Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[f₁] g₂) :
bind f₁ g₁ ≤ bind f₂ g₂ := by
refine le_trans (fun s hs => ?_) (join_mono <| map_mono hf)
simp only [mem_join, mem_bind', mem_map] at hs ⊢
filter_upwards [hg, hs] with _ hx hs using hx hs
#align filter.bind_mono Filter.bind_mono
theorem bind_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {g : α → Filter β} {s : Set β} :
(f.bind fun x => g x ⊓ 𝓟 s) = f.bind g ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
Filter.ext fun s => by simp only [mem_bind, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.bind_inf_principal Filter.bind_inf_principal
theorem sup_bind {f g : Filter α} {h : α → Filter β} : bind (f ⊔ g) h = bind f h ⊔ bind g h := rfl
#align filter.sup_bind Filter.sup_bind
theorem principal_bind {s : Set α} {f : α → Filter β} : bind (𝓟 s) f = ⨆ x ∈ s, f x :=
show join (map f (𝓟 s)) = ⨆ x ∈ s, f x by
simp only [sSup_image, join_principal_eq_sSup, map_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_bind Filter.principal_bind
end Bind
/-! ### Limits -/
/-- `Filter.Tendsto` is the generic "limit of a function" predicate.
`Tendsto f l₁ l₂` asserts that for every `l₂` neighborhood `a`,
the `f`-preimage of `a` is an `l₁` neighborhood. -/
def Tendsto (f : α → β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :=
l₁.map f ≤ l₂
#align filter.tendsto Filter.Tendsto
theorem tendsto_def {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, f ⁻¹' s ∈ l₁ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_def Filter.tendsto_def
theorem tendsto_iff_eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃p : β → Prop⦄, (∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) → ∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_iff_eventually Filter.tendsto_iff_eventually
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, ∀ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem Filter.tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem
lemma Tendsto.eventually_mem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {s : Set β}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : s ∈ l₂) : ∀ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∈ s :=
hf h
theorem Tendsto.eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) : ∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
hf h
#align filter.tendsto.eventually Filter.Tendsto.eventually
theorem not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
¬Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∃ s ∈ l₂, ∃ᶠ x in l₁, f x ∉ s := by
simp only [tendsto_iff_forall_eventually_mem, not_forall, exists_prop, not_eventually]
#align filter.not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem Filter.not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem
theorem Tendsto.frequently {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x)) : ∃ᶠ y in l₂, p y :=
mt hf.eventually h
#align filter.tendsto.frequently Filter.Tendsto.frequently
theorem Tendsto.frequently_map {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(f : α → β) (c : Filter.Tendsto f l₁ l₂) (w : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p x) :
∃ᶠ y in l₂, q y :=
c.frequently (h.mono w)
#align filter.tendsto.frequently_map Filter.Tendsto.frequently_map
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_bot {f : α → β} {l : Filter β} : Tendsto f ⊥ l := by simp [Tendsto]
#align filter.tendsto_bot Filter.tendsto_bot
@[simp] theorem tendsto_top {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} : Tendsto f l ⊤ := le_top
#align filter.tendsto_top Filter.tendsto_top
theorem le_map_of_right_inverse {mab : α → β} {mba : β → α} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
(h₁ : mab ∘ mba =ᶠ[g] id) (h₂ : Tendsto mba g f) : g ≤ map mab f := by
rw [← @map_id _ g, ← map_congr h₁, ← map_map]
exact map_mono h₂
#align filter.le_map_of_right_inverse Filter.le_map_of_right_inverse
theorem tendsto_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {f : α → β} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} :
Tendsto f la lb := by simp only [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty la, tendsto_bot]
#align filter.tendsto_of_is_empty Filter.tendsto_of_isEmpty
theorem eventuallyEq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} {fa : Filter α}
{fb : Filter β} (hleft : ∀ᶠ x in fa, g₁ (f x) = x) (hright : ∀ᶠ y in fb, f (g₂ y) = y)
(htendsto : Tendsto g₂ fb fa) : g₁ =ᶠ[fb] g₂ :=
(htendsto.eventually hleft).mp <| hright.mono fun _ hr hl => (congr_arg g₁ hr.symm).trans hl
#align filter.eventually_eq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv Filter.eventuallyEq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv
theorem tendsto_iff_comap {f : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.comap f :=
map_le_iff_le_comap
#align filter.tendsto_iff_comap Filter.tendsto_iff_comap
alias ⟨Tendsto.le_comap, _⟩ := tendsto_iff_comap
#align filter.tendsto.le_comap Filter.Tendsto.le_comap
protected theorem Tendsto.disjoint {f : α → β} {la₁ la₂ : Filter α} {lb₁ lb₂ : Filter β}
(h₁ : Tendsto f la₁ lb₁) (hd : Disjoint lb₁ lb₂) (h₂ : Tendsto f la₂ lb₂) : Disjoint la₁ la₂ :=
(disjoint_comap hd).mono h₁.le_comap h₂.le_comap
#align filter.tendsto.disjoint Filter.Tendsto.disjoint
theorem tendsto_congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ := by rw [Tendsto, Tendsto, map_congr hl]
#align filter.tendsto_congr' Filter.tendsto_congr'
theorem Tendsto.congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂)
(h : Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂) : Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr' hl).1 h
#align filter.tendsto.congr' Filter.Tendsto.congr'
theorem tendsto_congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
tendsto_congr' (univ_mem' h)
#align filter.tendsto_congr Filter.tendsto_congr
theorem Tendsto.congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : Filter α} {l₂ : Filter β} (h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
Tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ → Tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr h).1
#align filter.tendsto.congr Filter.Tendsto.congr
theorem tendsto_id' {x y : Filter α} : Tendsto id x y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.tendsto_id' Filter.tendsto_id'
theorem tendsto_id {x : Filter α} : Tendsto id x x :=
le_refl x
#align filter.tendsto_id Filter.tendsto_id
theorem Tendsto.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} {z : Filter γ}
(hg : Tendsto g y z) (hf : Tendsto f x y) : Tendsto (g ∘ f) x z := fun _ hs => hf (hg hs)
#align filter.tendsto.comp Filter.Tendsto.comp
protected theorem Tendsto.iterate {f : α → α} {l : Filter α} (h : Tendsto f l l) :
∀ n, Tendsto (f^[n]) l l
| 0 => tendsto_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
theorem Tendsto.mono_left {f : α → β} {x y : Filter α} {z : Filter β} (hx : Tendsto f x z)
(h : y ≤ x) : Tendsto f y z :=
(map_mono h).trans hx
#align filter.tendsto.mono_left Filter.Tendsto.mono_left
theorem Tendsto.mono_right {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y z : Filter β} (hy : Tendsto f x y)
(hz : y ≤ z) : Tendsto f x z :=
le_trans hy hz
#align filter.tendsto.mono_right Filter.Tendsto.mono_right
theorem Tendsto.neBot {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} (h : Tendsto f x y) [hx : NeBot x] :
NeBot y :=
(hx.map _).mono h
#align filter.tendsto.ne_bot Filter.Tendsto.neBot
theorem tendsto_map {f : α → β} {x : Filter α} : Tendsto f x (map f x) :=
le_refl (map f x)
#align filter.tendsto_map Filter.tendsto_map
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_map'_iff {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f (map g x) y ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ g) x y := by
rw [Tendsto, Tendsto, map_map]
#align filter.tendsto_map'_iff Filter.tendsto_map'_iff
alias ⟨_, tendsto_map'⟩ := tendsto_map'_iff
#align filter.tendsto_map' Filter.tendsto_map'
theorem tendsto_comap {f : α → β} {x : Filter β} : Tendsto f (comap f x) x :=
map_comap_le
#align filter.tendsto_comap Filter.tendsto_comap
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comap_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : Filter α} {c : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f a (c.comap g) ↔ Tendsto (g ∘ f) a c :=
⟨fun h => tendsto_comap.comp h, fun h => map_le_iff_le_comap.mp <| by rwa [map_map]⟩
#align filter.tendsto_comap_iff Filter.tendsto_comap_iff
theorem tendsto_comap'_iff {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {i : γ → α} (h : range i ∈ f) :
Tendsto (m ∘ i) (comap i f) g ↔ Tendsto m f g := by
rw [Tendsto, ← map_compose]
simp only [(· ∘ ·), map_comap_of_mem h, Tendsto]
#align filter.tendsto_comap'_iff Filter.tendsto_comap'_iff
theorem Tendsto.of_tendsto_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β} {c : Filter γ}
(hfg : Tendsto (g ∘ f) a c) (hg : comap g c ≤ b) : Tendsto f a b := by
rw [tendsto_iff_comap] at hfg ⊢
calc
a ≤ comap (g ∘ f) c := hfg
_ ≤ comap f b := by simpa [comap_comap] using comap_mono hg
#align filter.tendsto.of_tendsto_comp Filter.Tendsto.of_tendsto_comp
theorem comap_eq_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α) (eq : ψ ∘ φ = id)
(hφ : Tendsto φ f g) (hψ : Tendsto ψ g f) : comap φ g = f := by
refine ((comap_mono <| map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hψ).trans ?_).antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hφ)
rw [comap_comap, eq, comap_id]
#align filter.comap_eq_of_inverse Filter.comap_eq_of_inverse
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 3,183 | 3,186 | theorem map_eq_of_inverse {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α) (eq : φ ∘ ψ = id)
(hφ : Tendsto φ f g) (hψ : Tendsto ψ g f) : map φ f = g := by |
refine le_antisymm hφ (le_trans ?_ (map_mono hψ))
rw [map_map, eq, map_id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
/-!
# Topology on extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
/-- Topology on `ℝ≥0∞`.
Note: this is different from the `EMetricSpace` topology. The `EMetricSpace` topology has
`IsOpen {∞}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
/-- Closed intervals `Set.Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)`, `ε ≠ 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of an
extended nonnegative real number `x ≠ ∞`. We use `Set.Icc` instead of `Set.Ioo` because this way the
statement works for `x = 0`.
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ℝ≥0∞` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_right ENNReal.continuous_sub_right
protected theorem Tendsto.pow {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => m x ^ n) f (𝓝 (a ^ n)) :=
((continuous_pow n).tendsto a).comp hm
#align ennreal.tendsto.pow ENNReal.Tendsto.pow
theorem le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a < 1, a * x ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
have : Tendsto (· * x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 (1 * x)) :=
(ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inr one_ne_zero)).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [one_mul] at this
exact le_of_tendsto this (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall h)
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le
theorem iInf_mul_left' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i := by
by_cases H : a = ∞ ∧ ⨅ i, f i = 0
· rcases h H.1 H.2 with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [H.2, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
exact fun b hb => ⟨i, by rwa [hi, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero]⟩
· rw [not_and_or] at H
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, iInf_of_empty, mul_top]
exact mt h0 (not_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›)
· exact (ENNReal.mul_left_mono.map_iInf_of_continuousAt'
(ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul H)).symm
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left' ENNReal.iInf_mul_left'
theorem iInf_mul_left {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_mul_left' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left ENNReal.iInf_mul_left
theorem iInf_mul_right' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a := by
simpa only [mul_comm a] using iInf_mul_left' h h0
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right' ENNReal.iInf_mul_right'
theorem iInf_mul_right {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a :=
iInf_mul_right' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right ENNReal.iInf_mul_right
theorem inv_map_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iInf x)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iInf x
#align ennreal.inv_map_infi ENNReal.inv_map_iInf
theorem inv_map_iSup {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iSup x)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iSup x
#align ennreal.inv_map_supr ENNReal.inv_map_iSup
theorem inv_limsup {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(limsup x l)⁻¹ = liminf (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.limsup_apply
#align ennreal.inv_limsup ENNReal.inv_limsup
theorem inv_liminf {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(liminf x l)⁻¹ = limsup (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.liminf_apply
#align ennreal.inv_liminf ENNReal.inv_liminf
instance : ContinuousInv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨OrderIso.invENNReal.continuous⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `[InvolutiveInv _] [ContinuousInv _]`
protected theorem tendsto_inv_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun x => (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using Tendsto.inv h, Tendsto.inv⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff
protected theorem Tendsto.div {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul hma _ (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _ <;> simp [ha, hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div ENNReal.Tendsto.div
protected theorem Tendsto.const_div {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.const_mul (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm)
simp [hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_div ENNReal.Tendsto.const_div
protected theorem Tendsto.div_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul_const hm
simp [ha]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div_const ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const
protected theorem tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.inv_top ▸ ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : iSup s + a = ⨆ b, s b + a :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) <|
monotone_id.add monotone_const
#align ennreal.supr_add ENNReal.iSup_add
theorem biSup_add' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + a = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i + a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 h
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_add]
#align ennreal.bsupr_add' ENNReal.biSup_add'
theorem add_biSup' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), a + f i := by
simp only [add_comm a, biSup_add' h]
#align ennreal.add_bsupr' ENNReal.add_biSup'
theorem biSup_add {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + a = ⨆ i ∈ s, f i + a :=
biSup_add' hs
#align ennreal.bsupr_add ENNReal.biSup_add
theorem add_biSup {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, a + f i :=
add_biSup' hs
#align ennreal.add_bsupr ENNReal.add_biSup
theorem sSup_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s + a = ⨆ b ∈ s, b + a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_add hs]
#align ennreal.Sup_add ENNReal.sSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : a + iSup s = ⨆ b, a + s b := by
rw [add_comm, iSup_add]; simp [add_comm]
#align ennreal.add_supr ENNReal.add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_le {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞}
{a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, f i + g j ≤ a) : iSup f + iSup g ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_add, add_iSup]; exact iSup₂_le h
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_le ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_le
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {q : ι' → Prop} (hp : ∃ i, p i) (hq : ∃ j, q j)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, q j → f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + ⨆ (j) (_ : q j), g j) ≤ a := by
simp_rw [biSup_add' hp, add_biSup' hq]
exact iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup₂_le (h i hi)
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le' ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le'
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le {ι ι'} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ t, f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) ≤ a :=
biSup_add_biSup_le' hs ht h
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le
theorem iSup_add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iSup_of_empty, bot_eq_zero, zero_add]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun a => add_le_add (le_iSup _ _) (le_iSup _ _))
refine iSup_add_iSup_le fun i j => ?_
rcases h i j with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact le_iSup_of_le k hk
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : Monotone g) : iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a :=
iSup_add_iSup fun i j => ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add (hf <| le_sup_left) (hg <| le_sup_right)⟩
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_of_monotone ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone
theorem finset_sum_iSup_nat {α} {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] {s : Finset α} {f : α → ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) : (∑ a ∈ s, iSup (f a)) = ⨆ n, ∑ a ∈ s, f a n := by
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a s has ih
simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [ih, iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone (hf a)]
intro i j h
exact Finset.sum_le_sum fun a _ => hf a h
#align ennreal.finset_sum_supr_nat ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * iSup f = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· obtain rfl : f = fun _ => 0 := funext hf
simp only [iSup_zero_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· refine (monotone_id.const_mul' _).map_iSup_of_continuousAt ?_ (mul_zero a)
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id (Or.inl ?_)
exact mt iSup_eq_zero.1 hf
#align ennreal.mul_supr ENNReal.mul_iSup
theorem mul_sSup {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, a * i := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.mul_Sup ENNReal.mul_sSup
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
#align ennreal.supr_mul ENNReal.iSup_mul
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (f : ι → ℝ≥0∞)
(c : R) : (c • ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, c • f i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `iSup _` with `iSup f`
simp only [← smul_one_mul c (f _), ← smul_one_mul c (iSup f), ENNReal.mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.smul_supr ENNReal.smul_iSup
theorem smul_sSup {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (c : R) :
c • sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, c • i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `_` with `s`
simp_rw [← smul_one_mul c (sSup s), ENNReal.mul_sSup, smul_one_mul]
#align ennreal.smul_Sup ENNReal.smul_sSup
theorem iSup_div {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f / a = ⨆ i, f i / a :=
iSup_mul
#align ennreal.supr_div ENNReal.iSup_div
protected theorem tendsto_coe_sub {b : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun b : ℝ≥0∞ => ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
continuous_nnreal_sub.tendsto _
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub ENNReal.tendsto_coe_sub
theorem sub_iSup {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {b : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a < ∞) :
(a - ⨆ i, b i) = ⨅ i, a - b i :=
antitone_const_tsub.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuous_sub_left hr.ne).continuousAt
#align ennreal.sub_supr ENNReal.sub_iSup
theorem exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ 0 ∉ s ∧ ∞ ∉ s := by
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, hs⟩ :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∉ s) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∉ s :=
exists_countable_dense_no_bot_top ℝ≥0∞
exact ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, fun h => hs.1 0 (by simp) h, fun h => hs.2 ∞ (by simp) h⟩
#align ennreal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
theorem exists_lt_add_of_lt_add {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x < y + z) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
∃ y' z', y' < y ∧ z' < z ∧ x < y' + z' := by
have : NeZero y := ⟨hy⟩
have : NeZero z := ⟨hz⟩
have A : Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 + p.2) (𝓝[<] y ×ˢ 𝓝[<] z) (𝓝 (y + z)) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ (Filter.prod_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
rw [← nhds_prod_eq]
exact tendsto_add
rcases ((A.eventually (lt_mem_nhds h)).and
(Filter.prod_mem_prod self_mem_nhdsWithin self_mem_nhdsWithin)).exists with
⟨⟨y', z'⟩, hx, hy', hz'⟩
exact ⟨y', z', hy', hz', hx⟩
#align ennreal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add ENNReal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add
theorem ofReal_cinfi (f : α → ℝ) [Nonempty α] :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
by_cases hf : BddBelow (range f)
· exact
Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
(fun i j hij => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hij) hf
· symm
rw [Real.iInf_of_not_bddBelow hf, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
obtain ⟨y, hy_mem, hy_neg⟩ := not_bddBelow_iff.mp hf 0
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hy_mem
refine fun x hx => ⟨i, ?_⟩
rwa [ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hy_neg.le]
#align ennreal.of_real_cinfi ENNReal.ofReal_cinfi
end TopologicalSpace
section Liminf
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, x n < R := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h r] with i hi using hi.trans (le_abs_self (x i))
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, R < x n := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h (-r)] with i hi using(le_neg.1 hi).trans (neg_le_abs _)
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top'
theorem exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hf : liminf (fun i => (Real.nnabs (x i) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞)
(hbdd : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun i => |x i|) :
∃ a b : ℚ, a < b ∧ (∃ᶠ i in l, x i < a) ∧ ∃ᶠ i in l, ↑b < x i := by
rw [isBoundedUnder_le_abs, not_and_or] at hbdd
obtain hbdd | hbdd := hbdd
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_gt R
refine ⟨q, q + 1, (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le hq (not_lt.1 hx)).le
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q + 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_lt R
refine ⟨q - 1, q, (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q - 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 ((not_lt.1 hx).trans hq.le)
#align ennreal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under ENNReal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under
end Liminf
section tsum
variable {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
@[norm_cast]
protected theorem hasSum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum (fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↑r ↔ HasSum f r := by
simp only [HasSum, ← coe_finset_sum, tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.has_sum_coe ENNReal.hasSum_coe
protected theorem tsum_coe_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0} (h : HasSum f r) : (∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = r :=
(ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 h).tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq
protected theorem coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : Summable f → ↑(tsum f) = ∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)
| ⟨r, hr⟩ => by rw [hr.tsum_eq, ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
#align ennreal.coe_tsum ENNReal.coe_tsum
protected theorem hasSum : HasSum f (⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a) :=
tendsto_atTop_iSup fun _ _ => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset
#align ennreal.has_sum ENNReal.hasSum
@[simp]
protected theorem summable : Summable f :=
⟨_, ENNReal.hasSum⟩
#align ennreal.summable ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → ℝ≥0} : (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ENNReal.coe_tsum h ▸ ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
lift ∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞) to ℝ≥0 using h with a ha
refine ⟨a, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 ?_⟩
rw [ha]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum : ∑' a, f a = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a :=
ENNReal.hasSum.tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Finset α) (hs : ∀ t, ∃ i, t ⊆ s i) :
∑' a, f a = ⨆ i, ∑ a ∈ s i, f a := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
symm
change ⨆ i : ι, (fun t : Finset α => ∑ a ∈ t, f a) (s i) = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a
exact (Finset.sum_mono_set f).iSup_comp_eq hs
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum'
protected theorem tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : ∀ a, β a → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma ENNReal.tsum_sigma
protected theorem tsum_sigma' {β : α → Type*} (f : (Σa, β a) → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma' ENNReal.tsum_sigma'
protected theorem tsum_prod {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod ENNReal.tsum_prod
protected theorem tsum_prod' {f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f (a, b) :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod' ENNReal.tsum_prod'
protected theorem tsum_comm {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' a, ∑' b, f a b = ∑' b, ∑' a, f a b :=
tsum_comm' ENNReal.summable (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_comm ENNReal.tsum_comm
protected theorem tsum_add : ∑' a, (f a + g a) = ∑' a, f a + ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_add ENNReal.tsum_add
protected theorem tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : ∑' a, f a ≤ ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_le_tsum h ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_le_tsum ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum
@[gcongr]
protected theorem _root_.GCongr.ennreal_tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : tsum f ≤ tsum g :=
ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum h
protected theorem sum_le_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (s : Finset α) : ∑ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
sum_le_tsum s (fun _ _ => zero_le _) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.sum_le_tsum ENNReal.sum_le_tsum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat' {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {N : ℕ → ℕ} (hN : Tendsto N atTop atTop) :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range (N i), f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ fun t =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := t.exists_nat_subset_range
let ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop hN 0 n
⟨k, Finset.Subset.trans hn (Finset.range_mono hk)⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat'
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range i, f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = liminf (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.liminf_eq.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_limsup_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = limsup (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.limsup_eq.symm
protected theorem le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ ∑' a, f a :=
le_tsum' ENNReal.summable a
#align ennreal.le_tsum ENNReal.le_tsum
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_eq_zero : ∑' i, f i = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 :=
tsum_eq_zero_iff ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_zero ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero
protected theorem tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → ∑' a, f a = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => top_unique <| ha ▸ ENNReal.le_tsum a
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top
protected theorem lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top {a : α → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞) (j : α) :
a j < ∞ := by
contrapose! tsum_ne_top with h
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨j, top_unique h⟩
#align ennreal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_top [Nonempty α] : ∑' _ : α, ∞ = ∞ :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_top ENNReal.tsum_top
theorem tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero {α : Type*} [Infinite α] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
∑' _ : α, c = ∞ := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c) atTop (𝓝 (∞ * c)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_nat_nhds_top
simp only [true_or_iff, top_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff]
have B : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c ≤ ∑' _ : α, c := fun n => by
rcases Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n with ⟨s, hs⟩
simpa [hs] using @ENNReal.sum_le_tsum α (fun _ => c) s
simpa [hc] using le_of_tendsto' A B
#align ennreal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero
protected theorem ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : ∑' a, f a ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ := fun ha =>
h <| ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
#align ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top
protected theorem tsum_mul_left : ∑' i, a * f i = a * ∑' i, f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· simp [hf]
· rw [← ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at hf
have : Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑ j ∈ s, a * f j) atTop (𝓝 (a * ∑' i, f i)) := by
simp only [← Finset.mul_sum]
exact ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.summable.hasSum (Or.inl hf)
exact HasSum.tsum_eq this
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_left ENNReal.tsum_mul_left
protected theorem tsum_mul_right : ∑' i, f i * a = (∑' i, f i) * a := by
simp [mul_comm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_right ENNReal.tsum_mul_right
protected theorem tsum_const_smul {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (a : R) :
∑' i, a • f i = a • ∑' i, f i := by
simpa only [smul_one_mul] using @ENNReal.tsum_mul_left _ (a • (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) _
#align ennreal.tsum_const_smul ENNReal.tsum_const_smul
@[simp]
theorem tsum_iSup_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} : (∑' b : α, ⨆ _ : a = b, f b) = f a :=
(tsum_eq_single a fun _ h => by simp [h.symm]).trans <| by simp
#align ennreal.tsum_supr_eq ENNReal.tsum_iSup_eq
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
refine ⟨HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← iSup_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat]
· exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
· exact fun s t hst => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (Finset.range_subset.2 hst)
#align ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem tendsto_nat_tsum (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) := by
rw [← hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_tsum ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum
theorem toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) (x : α) :
(((ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = f x :=
coe_toNNReal <| ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf _
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Summable (ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) := by
simpa only [← tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top hf] using hf
#align ennreal.summable_to_nnreal_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) := by
have f_ne_top : ∀ n, f n ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
have h_f_coe : f = fun n => ((f n).toNNReal : ENNReal) :=
funext fun n => (coe_toNNReal (f_ne_top n)).symm
rw [h_f_coe, ← @coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact NNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_summable (summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top hf)
#align ennreal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
exact tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top hf
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- The sum over the complement of a finset tends to `0` when the finset grows to cover the whole
space. This does not need a summability assumption, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑' b : { x // x ∉ s }, f b) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
convert ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 (NNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero f)
rw [ENNReal.coe_tsum]
exact NNReal.summable_comp_injective (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf) Subtype.coe_injective
#align ennreal.tendsto_tsum_compl_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero
protected theorem tsum_apply {ι α : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : α} :
(∑' i, f i) x = ∑' i, f i x :=
tsum_apply <| Pi.summable.mpr fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_apply ENNReal.tsum_apply
theorem tsum_sub {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : ∑' i, g i ≠ ∞) (h₂ : g ≤ f) :
∑' i, (f i - g i) = ∑' i, f i - ∑' i, g i :=
have : ∀ i, f i - g i + g i = f i := fun i => tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h₂ i)
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h₁ <| by simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_add, this]
#align ennreal.tsum_sub ENNReal.tsum_sub
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' x, g (f x) ≤ ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj f hf (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable
ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' y, g y ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) :=
calc ∑' y, g y = ∑' y, g (f (surjInv hf y)) := by simp only [surjInv_eq hf]
_ ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) := tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf) _
theorem tsum_mono_subtype (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∑' x : s, f x ≤ ∑' x : t, f x :=
tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (inclusion_injective h) _
#align ennreal.tsum_mono_subtype ENNReal.tsum_mono_subtype
theorem tsum_iUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' x : Σ i, t i, f x.2 :=
tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective (sigmaToiUnion_surjective t) _
_ = ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x := ENNReal.tsum_sigma' _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s , t i, f x ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x = ∑' x : ⋃ i : s, t i, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ <| by simp
_ ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x := tsum_iUnion_le_tsum _ _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
(tsum_biUnion_le_tsum f s.toSet t).trans_eq (Finset.tsum_subtype s fun i => ∑' x : t i, f x)
#align ennreal.tsum_bUnion_le ENNReal.tsum_biUnion_le
theorem tsum_iUnion_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i, ∑' x : t i, f x := by
rw [← tsum_fintype]
exact tsum_iUnion_le_tsum f t
#align ennreal.tsum_Union_le ENNReal.tsum_iUnion_le
theorem tsum_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x ≤ ∑' x : s, f x + ∑' x : t, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x = ∑' x : ⋃ b, cond b s t, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ union_eq_iUnion
_ ≤ _ := by simpa using tsum_iUnion_le f (cond · s t)
#align ennreal.tsum_union_le ENNReal.tsum_union_le
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (b : β) :
∑' x, f x = f b + ∑' x, ite (x = b) 0 (f x) :=
tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' b ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite ENNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
theorem tsum_add_one_eq_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' n, f n = ∞) (hf0 : f 0 ≠ ∞) :
∑' n, f (n + 1) = ∞ := by
rw [tsum_eq_zero_add' ENNReal.summable, add_eq_top] at hf
exact hf.resolve_left hf0
#align ennreal.tsum_add_one_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_add_one_eq_top
/-- A sum of extended nonnegative reals which is finite can have only finitely many terms
above any positive threshold. -/
theorem finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite := by
by_contra h
have := Infinite.to_subtype h
refine tsum_ne_top (top_unique ?_)
calc ∞ = ∑' _ : { i | ε ≤ a i }, ε := (tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ε_ne_zero).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.val_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun i => i.2) ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- Markov's inequality for `Finset.card` and `tsum` in `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
theorem finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (c_ne_top : c ≠ ∞)
(tsum_le_c : ∑' i, a i ≤ c) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite, ↑hf.toFinset.card ≤ c / ε := by
have hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite :=
finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top (ne_top_of_le_ne_top c_ne_top tsum_le_c) ε_ne_zero
refine ⟨hf, (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (.inl ε_ne_zero) (.inr c_ne_top)).2 ?_⟩
calc ↑hf.toFinset.card * ε = ∑ _i ∈ hf.toFinset, ε := by rw [Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ hf.toFinset, a i := Finset.sum_le_sum fun i => hf.mem_toFinset.1
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := ENNReal.sum_le_tsum _
_ ≤ c := tsum_le_c
#align ennreal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le ENNReal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le
theorem tsum_fiberwise (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) (g : β → γ) :
∑' x, ∑' b : g ⁻¹' {x}, f b = ∑' i, f i := by
apply HasSum.tsum_eq
let equiv := Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv g
apply (equiv.hasSum_iff.mpr ENNReal.summable.hasSum).sigma
exact fun _ ↦ ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.mpr rfl
end tsum
theorem tendsto_toReal_iff {ι} {fi : Filter ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) {x : ℝ≥0∞}
(hx : x ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun n => (f n).toReal) fi (𝓝 x.toReal) ↔ Tendsto f fi (𝓝 x) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx
simp [tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) := by
rw [NNReal.summable_coe]
exact tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe
theorem tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = ∞ ↔ ¬Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) :=
tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe.not_right
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe
theorem hasSum_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
HasSum (fun x => (f x).toReal) (∑' x, (f x).toReal) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hsum
simp only [coe_toReal, ← NNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.hasSum_coe]
exact (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hsum).hasSum
#align ennreal.has_sum_to_real ENNReal.hasSum_toReal
theorem summable_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) : Summable fun x => (f x).toReal :=
(hasSum_toReal hsum).summable
#align ennreal.summable_to_real ENNReal.summable_toReal
end ENNReal
namespace NNReal
theorem tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum {f : β → ℝ≥0} : ∑' b, f b = (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)).toNNReal := by
by_cases h : Summable f
· rw [← ENNReal.coe_tsum h, ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
· have A := tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable h
simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, Classical.not_not] at h
simp only [h, ENNReal.top_toNNReal, A]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_to_nnreal_tsum NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem exists_le_hasSum_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : HasSum f r) :
∃ p ≤ r, HasSum g p :=
have : (∑' b, (g b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≤ r := by
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) ENNReal.summable.hasSum (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 hfr)
exact ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
let ⟨p, Eq, hpr⟩ := ENNReal.le_coe_iff.1 this
⟨p, hpr, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 <| Eq ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum⟩
#align nnreal.exists_le_has_sum_of_le NNReal.exists_le_hasSum_of_le
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem summable_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) : Summable f → Summable g
| ⟨_r, hfr⟩ =>
let ⟨_p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_hasSum_of_le hgf hfr
hp.summable
#align nnreal.summable_of_le NNReal.summable_of_le
/-- Summable non-negative functions have countable support -/
theorem _root_.Summable.countable_support_nnreal (f : α → ℝ≥0) (h : Summable f) :
f.support.Countable := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe] at h
simpa [support] using h.countable_support
/-- A series of non-negative real numbers converges to `r` in the sense of `HasSum` if and only if
the sequence of partial sum converges to `r`. -/
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
rw [← ENNReal.hasSum_coe, ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_finset_sum]
exact ENNReal.tendsto_coe
#align nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat NNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ((tendsto_of_monotone ?_).resolve_right h).comp ?_
exacts [Finset.sum_mono_set _, tendsto_finset_range]
· rintro hnat ⟨r, hr⟩
exact not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop hnat _ (hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat.1 hr)
#align nnreal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop]
#align nnreal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : Summable f := by
refine summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop.2 fun H => ?_
rcases exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop H 0 c with ⟨n, -, hn⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ (hn.trans_le (h n))
#align nnreal.summable_of_sum_range_le NNReal.summable_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le (summable_of_sum_range_le h) h
#align nnreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le NNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {i : β → α}
(hi : Function.Injective i) : (∑' x, f (i x)) ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj i hi (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) (summable_comp_injective hf hi)
hf
#align nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
theorem summable_sigma {β : α → Type*} {f : (Σ x, β x) → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y => f ⟨x, y⟩) ∧ Summable fun x => ∑' y, f ⟨x, y⟩ := by
constructor
· simp only [← NNReal.summable_coe, NNReal.coe_tsum]
exact fun h => ⟨h.sigma_factor, h.sigma⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simpa only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, ENNReal.tsum_sigma',
ENNReal.coe_tsum (h₁ _)] using h₂
#align nnreal.summable_sigma NNReal.summable_sigma
theorem indicator_summable {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (s : Set α) :
Summable (s.indicator f) := by
refine NNReal.summable_of_le (fun a => le_trans (le_of_eq (s.indicator_apply f a)) ?_) hf
split_ifs
· exact le_refl (f a)
· exact zero_le_coe
#align nnreal.indicator_summable NNReal.indicator_summable
theorem tsum_indicator_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {s : Set α} (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :
(∑' x, (s.indicator f) x) ≠ 0 := fun h' =>
let ⟨a, ha, hap⟩ := h
hap ((Set.indicator_apply_eq_self.mpr (absurd ha)).symm.trans
((tsum_eq_zero_iff (indicator_summable hf s)).1 h' a))
#align nnreal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero NNReal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero
open Finset
/-- For `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0`, then `∑' k, f (k + i)` tends to zero. This does not require a summability
assumption on `f`, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0) : Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← tendsto_coe]
convert _root_.tendsto_sum_nat_add fun i => (f i : ℝ)
norm_cast
#align nnreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
nonrec theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
have A : ∀ a : α, (f a : ℝ) ≤ g a := fun a => NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
have : (sf : ℝ) < sg := hasSum_lt A (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hi) (hasSum_coe.2 hf) (hasSum_coe.2 hg)
exact NNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 this
#align nnreal.has_sum_lt NNReal.hasSum_lt
@[mono]
theorem hasSum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg)
(h : f < g) : sf < sg :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
hasSum_lt hle hi hf hg
#align nnreal.has_sum_strict_mono NNReal.hasSum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hg : Summable g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
hasSum_lt h hi (summable_of_le h hg).hasSum hg.hasSum
#align nnreal.tsum_lt_tsum NNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
@[mono]
theorem tsum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (h : f < g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
tsum_lt_tsum hle hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_strict_mono NNReal.tsum_strict_mono
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 1,261 | 1,263 | theorem tsum_pos {g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (i : α) (hi : 0 < g i) : 0 < ∑' b, g b := by |
rw [← tsum_zero]
exact tsum_lt_tsum (fun a => zero_le _) hi hg
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
import Mathlib.Topology.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41bef4ae1254365bc190aee63b947674d2977f01"
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## TODO
This file is huge; move material into separate files,
such as `Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Lemmas.lean`.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
#align has_norm Norm
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
#align has_nnnorm NNNorm
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_group SeminormedGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_group NormedAddGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_group NormedGroup
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_comm_group SeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_comm_group SeminormedCommGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_comm_group NormedCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
#align normed_group.to_seminormed_group NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align normed_add_group.to_seminormed_add_group NormedAddGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
#align seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_normed_group NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_group NormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
def NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| by exact (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- Porting note: the `rwa` no longer worked, but it was easy enough to provide the term.
-- however, notice that if you make `x` and `y` accessible, then the following does work:
-- `have := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq x y; rwa [← this]`, so I'm not sure why the `rwa`
-- was broken.
#align normed_group.of_separation NormedGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_group.of_separation NormedAddGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
#align normed_comm_group.of_separation NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_separation NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist NormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist' NormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq x y := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
-- Porting note: how did `mathlib3` solve this automatically?
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_comm_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
#align group_norm.to_normed_group GroupNorm.toNormedGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_norm.to_normed_comm_group GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
instance PUnit.normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup PUnit where
norm := Function.const _ 0
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem PUnit.norm_eq_zero (r : PUnit) : ‖r‖ = 0 :=
rfl
#align punit.norm_eq_zero PUnit.norm_eq_zero
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
#align dist_eq_norm_div dist_eq_norm_div
#align dist_eq_norm_sub dist_eq_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align dist_eq_norm_div' dist_eq_norm_div'
#align dist_eq_norm_sub' dist_eq_norm_sub'
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
#align dist_eq_norm dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
#align dist_eq_norm' dist_eq_norm'
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right : IsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_right NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_right NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
#align dist_one_right dist_one_right
#align dist_zero_right dist_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext fun a => by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
#align dist_one_left dist_one_left
#align dist_zero_left dist_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_one Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero Isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) comap_norm_atTop]
theorem comap_norm_atTop' : comap norm atTop = cobounded E := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using comap_dist_right_atTop (1 : E)
@[to_additive Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm]
lemma Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set ℝ}
(h : HasBasis atTop p s) : HasBasis (cobounded E) p fun i ↦ norm ⁻¹' s i :=
comap_norm_atTop' (E := E) ▸ h.comap _
@[to_additive Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm]
lemma Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm' : HasBasis (cobounded E) (fun _ ↦ True) ({x | · ≤ ‖x‖}) :=
atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded' {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (‖f ·‖) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded E) := by
rw [← comap_norm_atTop', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop' : Tendsto norm (cobounded E) atTop :=
tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded'.2 tendsto_id
@[to_additive eventually_cobounded_le_norm]
lemma eventually_cobounded_le_norm' (a : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ x in cobounded E, a ≤ ‖x‖ :=
tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'.eventually_ge_atTop a
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop' [ProperSpace E] : Tendsto norm (cocompact E) atTop :=
cobounded_eq_cocompact (α := E) ▸ tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
#align norm_div_rev norm_div_rev
#align norm_sub_rev norm_sub_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
#align norm_inv' norm_inv'
#align norm_neg norm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
#align dist_mul_self_right dist_mul_self_right
#align dist_add_self_right dist_add_self_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
#align dist_mul_self_left dist_mul_self_left
#align dist_add_self_left dist_add_self_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Filter.inv_cobounded : (cobounded E)⁻¹ = cobounded E := by
simp only [← comap_norm_atTop', ← Filter.comap_inv, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), norm_inv']
/-- In a (semi)normed group, inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to infinity at infinity. -/
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity."]
theorem Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded : Tendsto Inv.inv (cobounded E) (cobounded E) :=
inv_cobounded.le
#align filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded
#align filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded Filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
#align norm_mul_le' norm_mul_le'
#align norm_add_le norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align norm_mul_le_of_le norm_mul_le_of_le
#align norm_add_le_of_le norm_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le]
theorem norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
#align norm_mul₃_le norm_mul₃_le
#align norm_add₃_le norm_add₃_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
#align norm_nonneg' norm_nonneg'
#align norm_nonneg norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
#align abs_norm abs_norm
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are nonnegative, via
`norm_nonneg'`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg' $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: additive norms are nonnegative, via `norm_nonneg`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalAddNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedAddGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
#align norm_one' norm_one'
#align norm_zero norm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
#align ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
#align norm_of_subsingleton' norm_of_subsingleton'
#align norm_of_subsingleton norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq'
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
#align norm_div_le norm_div_le
#align norm_sub_le norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
#align norm_div_le_of_le norm_div_le_of_le
#align norm_sub_le_of_le norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm' dist_le_norm_add_norm'
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm dist_le_norm_add_norm
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le' abs_norm_sub_norm_le'
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le abs_norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
#align norm_sub_norm_le' norm_sub_norm_le'
#align norm_sub_norm_le norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
#align dist_norm_norm_le' dist_norm_norm_le'
#align dist_norm_norm_le dist_norm_norm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' norm_le_norm_add_norm_div'
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub' norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div norm_le_norm_add_norm_div
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
#align norm_le_insert' norm_le_insert'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
#align norm_le_insert norm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
#align norm_le_mul_norm_add norm_le_mul_norm_add
#align norm_le_add_norm_add norm_le_add_norm_add
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align ball_eq' ball_eq'
#align ball_eq ball_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
#align ball_one_eq ball_one_eq
#align ball_zero_eq ball_zero_eq
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm'' mem_ball_iff_norm''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm mem_ball_iff_norm
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 698 | 698 | theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by | rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShape
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
#align_import algebra.homology.homological_complex from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88bca0ce5d22ebfd9e73e682e51d60ea13b48347"
/-!
# Homological complexes.
A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
We provide `ChainComplex V α` for
`α`-indexed chain complexes in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`,
and similarly `CochainComplex V α`, with `i = j + 1`.
There is a category structure, where morphisms are chain maps.
For `C : HomologicalComplex V c`, we define `C.xNext i`, which is either `C.X j` for some
arbitrarily chosen `j` such that `c.r i j`, or `C.X i` if there is no such `j`.
Similarly we have `C.xPrev j`.
Defined in terms of these we have `C.dFrom i : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i` and
`C.dTo j : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j`, which are either defined as `C.d i j`, or zero, as needed.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
-/
structure HomologicalComplex (c : ComplexShape ι) where
X : ι → V
d : ∀ i j, X i ⟶ X j
shape : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel i j → d i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
d_comp_d' : ∀ i j k, c.Rel i j → c.Rel j k → d i j ≫ d j k = 0 := by aesop_cat
#align homological_complex HomologicalComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
attribute [simp] shape
variable {V} {c : ComplexShape ι}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem d_comp_d (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i j k : ι) : C.d i j ≫ C.d j k = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· by_cases hjk : c.Rel j k
· exact C.d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk
· rw [C.shape j k hjk, comp_zero]
· rw [C.shape i j hij, zero_comp]
#align homological_complex.d_comp_d HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d
theorem ext {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h_X : C₁.X = C₂.X)
(h_d :
∀ i j : ι,
c.Rel i j → C₁.d i j ≫ eqToHom (congr_fun h_X j) = eqToHom (congr_fun h_X i) ≫ C₂.d i j) :
C₁ = C₂ := by
obtain ⟨X₁, d₁, s₁, h₁⟩ := C₁
obtain ⟨X₂, d₂, s₂, h₂⟩ := C₂
dsimp at h_X
subst h_X
simp only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
ext i j
by_cases hij: c.Rel i j
· simpa only [comp_id, id_comp, eqToHom_refl] using h_d i j hij
· rw [s₁ i j hij, s₂ i j hij]
#align homological_complex.ext HomologicalComplex.ext
/-- The obvious isomorphism `K.X p ≅ K.X q` when `p = q`. -/
def XIsoOfEq (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p q : ι} (h : p = q) : K.X p ≅ K.X q :=
eqToIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
lemma XIsoOfEq_rfl (K : HomologicalComplex V c) (p : ι) :
K.XIsoOfEq (rfl : p = p) = Iso.refl _ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₃₂.symm)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₂₁.symm.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₃₂.trans h₂₁).symm).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ : ι} (h : p₁ = p₂) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₁ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₁) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₃) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₃ = p₂) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
end HomologicalComplex
/-- An `α`-indexed chain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`.
-/
abbrev ChainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.down α)
#align chain_complex ChainComplex
/-- An `α`-indexed cochain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `i + 1 = j`.
-/
abbrev CochainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.up α)
#align cochain_complex CochainComplex
namespace ChainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.down α).prev i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).prev_eq' rfl
#align chain_complex.prev ChainComplex.prev
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.down α).next i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).next_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
#align chain_complex.next ChainComplex.next
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
#align chain_complex.next_nat_zero ChainComplex.next_nat_zero
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.down ℕ).next_eq' rfl
#align chain_complex.next_nat_succ ChainComplex.next_nat_succ
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.up α).prev i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).prev_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
#align cochain_complex.prev CochainComplex.prev
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.up α).next i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).next_eq' rfl
#align cochain_complex.next CochainComplex.next
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
#align cochain_complex.prev_nat_zero CochainComplex.prev_nat_zero
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev_eq' rfl
#align cochain_complex.prev_nat_succ CochainComplex.prev_nat_succ
end CochainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {V}
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} (C : HomologicalComplex V c)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes consists of maps between the chain groups,
commuting with the differentials.
-/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) where
f : ∀ i, A.X i ⟶ B.X i
comm' : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f j := by aesop_cat
#align homological_complex.hom HomologicalComplex.Hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Hom.comm {A B : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : A.Hom B) (i j : ι) :
f.f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f.f j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· exact f.comm' i j hij
· rw [A.shape i j hij, B.shape i j hij, comp_zero, zero_comp]
#align homological_complex.hom.comm HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm
instance (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) : Inhabited (Hom A B) :=
⟨{ f := fun i => 0 }⟩
/-- Identity chain map. -/
def id (A : HomologicalComplex V c) : Hom A A where f _ := 𝟙 _
#align homological_complex.id HomologicalComplex.id
/-- Composition of chain maps. -/
def comp (A B C : HomologicalComplex V c) (φ : Hom A B) (ψ : Hom B C) : Hom A C where
f i := φ.f i ≫ ψ.f i
#align homological_complex.comp HomologicalComplex.comp
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
instance : Category (HomologicalComplex V c) where
Hom := Hom
id := id
comp := comp _ _ _
end
-- Porting note: added because `Hom.ext` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} (f g : C ⟶ D)
(h : ∀ i, f.f i = g.f i) : f = g := by
apply Hom.ext
funext
apply h
@[simp]
theorem id_f (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : Hom.f (𝟙 C) i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.id_f HomologicalComplex.id_f
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_f {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
(f ≫ g).f i = f.f i ≫ g.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.comp_f HomologicalComplex.comp_f
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h : C₁ = C₂) (n : ι) :
HomologicalComplex.Hom.f (eqToHom h) n =
eqToHom (congr_fun (congr_arg HomologicalComplex.X h) n) := by
subst h
rfl
#align homological_complex.eq_to_hom_f HomologicalComplex.eqToHom_f
-- We'll use this later to show that `HomologicalComplex V c` is preadditive when `V` is.
theorem hom_f_injective {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} :
Function.Injective fun f : Hom C₁ C₂ => f.f := by aesop_cat
#align homological_complex.hom_f_injective HomologicalComplex.hom_f_injective
instance (X Y : HomologicalComplex V c) : Zero (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨{ f := fun i => 0}⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_f (C D : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.zero_apply HomologicalComplex.zero_f
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (HomologicalComplex V c) where
open ZeroObject
/-- The zero complex -/
noncomputable def zero [HasZeroObject V] : HomologicalComplex V c where
X _ := 0
d _ _ := 0
#align homological_complex.zero HomologicalComplex.zero
theorem isZero_zero [HasZeroObject V] : IsZero (zero : HomologicalComplex V c) := by
refine ⟨fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩
all_goals
ext
dsimp [zero]
apply Subsingleton.elim
#align homological_complex.is_zero_zero HomologicalComplex.isZero_zero
instance [HasZeroObject V] : HasZeroObject (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨⟨zero, isZero_zero⟩⟩
noncomputable instance [HasZeroObject V] : Inhabited (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨zero⟩
theorem congr_hom {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} {f g : C ⟶ D} (w : f = g) (i : ι) :
f.f i = g.f i :=
congr_fun (congr_arg Hom.f w) i
#align homological_complex.congr_hom HomologicalComplex.congr_hom
lemma mono_of_mono_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Mono (φ.f i)) : Mono φ where
right_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_mono (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
lemma epi_of_epi_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Epi (φ.f i)) : Epi φ where
left_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_epi (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
section
variable (V c)
/-- The functor picking out the `i`-th object of a complex. -/
@[simps]
def eval (i : ι) : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ V where
obj C := C.X i
map f := f.f i
#align homological_complex.eval HomologicalComplex.eval
/-- The functor forgetting the differential in a complex, obtaining a graded object. -/
@[simps]
def forget : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ GradedObject ι V where
obj C := C.X
map f := f.f
#align homological_complex.forget HomologicalComplex.forget
instance : (forget V c).Faithful where
map_injective h := by
ext i
exact congr_fun h i
/-- Forgetting the differentials than picking out the `i`-th object is the same as
just picking out the `i`-th object. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetEval (i : ι) : forget V c ⋙ GradedObject.eval i ≅ eval V c i :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Iso.refl _
#align homological_complex.forget_eval HomologicalComplex.forgetEval
end
noncomputable section
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ φ.f n' := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n' ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ φ.f n := by subst h; simp
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i j'` are both allowed, then we must have `j = j'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem d_comp_eqToHom {i j j' : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i j') :
C.d i j' ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.next_eq rij' rij)) = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
#align homological_complex.d_comp_eq_to_hom HomologicalComplex.d_comp_eqToHom
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i' j` are both allowed, then we must have `i = i'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem eqToHom_comp_d {i i' j : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i' j) :
eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.prev_eq rij rij')) ≫ C.d i' j = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]
#align homological_complex.eq_to_hom_comp_d HomologicalComplex.eqToHom_comp_d
theorem kernel_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j j' : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) (r' : c.Rel i j') :
kernelSubobject (C.d i j) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j') := by
rw [← d_comp_eqToHom C r r']
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
#align homological_complex.kernel_eq_kernel HomologicalComplex.kernel_eq_kernel
theorem image_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i i' j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j)
(r' : c.Rel i' j) : imageSubobject (C.d i j) = imageSubobject (C.d i' j) := by
rw [← eqToHom_comp_d C r r']
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
#align homological_complex.image_eq_image HomologicalComplex.image_eq_image
section
/-- Either `C.X i`, if there is some `i` with `c.Rel i j`, or `C.X j`. -/
abbrev xPrev (j : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.prev j)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_prev HomologicalComplex.xPrev
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xPrevIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.prev_eq' r]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_prev_iso HomologicalComplex.xPrevIso
/-- If there is no `i` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xPrevIsoSelf {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.prev]
rw [dif_neg]
push_neg; intro i hi
have : c.prev j = i := c.prev_eq' hi
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_prev_iso_self HomologicalComplex.xPrevIsoSelf
/-- Either `C.X j`, if there is some `j` with `c.rel i j`, or `C.X i`. -/
abbrev xNext (i : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.next i)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_next HomologicalComplex.xNext
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.next_eq' r]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_next_iso HomologicalComplex.xNextIso
/-- If there is no `j` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.next]
rw [dif_neg]; rintro ⟨j, hj⟩
have : c.next i = j := c.next_eq' hj
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_next_iso_self HomologicalComplex.xNextIsoSelf
/-- The differential mapping into `C.X j`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dTo (j : ι) : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j :=
C.d (c.prev j) j
#align homological_complex.d_to HomologicalComplex.dTo
/-- The differential mapping out of `C.X i`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dFrom (i : ι) : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i :=
C.d i (c.next i)
#align homological_complex.d_from HomologicalComplex.dFrom
theorem dTo_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dTo j = (C.xPrevIso r).hom ≫ C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' r
exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
#align homological_complex.d_to_eq HomologicalComplex.dTo_eq
@[simp]
theorem dTo_eq_zero {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.dTo j = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
#align homological_complex.d_to_eq_zero HomologicalComplex.dTo_eq_zero
theorem dFrom_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dFrom i = C.d i j ≫ (C.xNextIso r).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' r
exact (Category.comp_id _).symm
#align homological_complex.d_from_eq HomologicalComplex.dFrom_eq
@[simp]
theorem dFrom_eq_zero {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.dFrom i = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
#align homological_complex.d_from_eq_zero HomologicalComplex.dFrom_eq_zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIso_comp_dTo {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : (C.xPrevIso r).inv ≫ C.dTo j = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dTo_eq r]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_prev_iso_comp_d_to HomologicalComplex.xPrevIso_comp_dTo
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIsoSelf_comp_dTo {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) :
(C.xPrevIsoSelf h).inv ≫ C.dTo j = 0 := by simp [h]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.X_prev_iso_self_comp_d_to HomologicalComplex.xPrevIsoSelf_comp_dTo
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIso r).hom = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dFrom_eq r]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.d_from_comp_X_next_iso HomologicalComplex.dFrom_comp_xNextIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIsoSelf h).hom = 0 := by simp [h]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align homological_complex.d_from_comp_X_next_iso_self HomologicalComplex.dFrom_comp_xNextIsoSelf
@[simp 1100]
theorem dTo_comp_dFrom (j : ι) : C.dTo j ≫ C.dFrom j = 0 :=
C.d_comp_d _ _ _
#align homological_complex.d_to_comp_d_from HomologicalComplex.dTo_comp_dFrom
theorem kernel_from_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
kernelSubobject (C.dFrom i) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dFrom_eq r]
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
#align homological_complex.kernel_from_eq_kernel HomologicalComplex.kernel_from_eq_kernel
theorem image_to_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
imageSubobject (C.dTo j) = imageSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dTo_eq r]
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
#align homological_complex.image_to_eq_image HomologicalComplex.image_to_eq_image
end
namespace Hom
variable {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c}
/-- The `i`-th component of an isomorphism of chain complexes. -/
@[simps!]
def isoApp (f : C₁ ≅ C₂) (i : ι) : C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i :=
(eval V c i).mapIso f
#align homological_complex.hom.iso_app HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoApp
/-- Construct an isomorphism of chain complexes from isomorphism of the objects
which commute with the differentials. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfComponents (f : ∀ i, C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i)
(hf : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → (f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j = C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom := by aesop_cat) :
C₁ ≅ C₂ where
hom :=
{ f := fun i => (f i).hom
comm' := hf }
inv :=
{ f := fun i => (f i).inv
comm' := fun i j hij =>
calc
(f i).inv ≫ C₁.d i j = (f i).inv ≫ (C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom) ≫ (f j).inv := by simp
_ = (f i).inv ≫ ((f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j) ≫ (f j).inv := by rw [hf i j hij]
_ = C₂.d i j ≫ (f j).inv := by simp }
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
exact (f i).hom_inv_id
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
exact (f i).inv_hom_id
#align homological_complex.hom.iso_of_components HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents
@[simp]
theorem isoOfComponents_app (f : ∀ i, C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i)
(hf : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → (f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j = C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom) (i : ι) :
isoApp (isoOfComponents f hf) i = f i := by
ext
simp
#align homological_complex.hom.iso_of_components_app HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents_app
theorem isIso_of_components (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) [∀ n : ι, IsIso (f.f n)] : IsIso f :=
(HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents fun n => asIso (f.f n)).isIso_hom
#align homological_complex.hom.is_iso_of_components HomologicalComplex.Hom.isIso_of_components
/-! Lemmas relating chain maps and `dTo`/`dFrom`. -/
/-- `f.prev j` is `f.f i` if there is some `r i j`, and `f.f j` otherwise. -/
abbrev prev (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : C₁.xPrev j ⟶ C₂.xPrev j :=
f.f _
#align homological_complex.hom.prev HomologicalComplex.Hom.prev
theorem prev_eq (f : Hom C₁ C₂) {i j : ι} (w : c.Rel i j) :
f.prev j = (C₁.xPrevIso w).hom ≫ f.f i ≫ (C₂.xPrevIso w).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' w
simp only [xPrevIso, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
#align homological_complex.hom.prev_eq HomologicalComplex.Hom.prev_eq
/-- `f.next i` is `f.f j` if there is some `r i j`, and `f.f j` otherwise. -/
abbrev next (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : C₁.xNext i ⟶ C₂.xNext i :=
f.f _
#align homological_complex.hom.next HomologicalComplex.Hom.next
theorem next_eq (f : Hom C₁ C₂) {i j : ι} (w : c.Rel i j) :
f.next i = (C₁.xNextIso w).hom ≫ f.f j ≫ (C₂.xNextIso w).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' w
simp only [xNextIso, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
#align homological_complex.hom.next_eq HomologicalComplex.Hom.next_eq
@[reassoc, elementwise] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem comm_from (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : f.f i ≫ C₂.dFrom i = C₁.dFrom i ≫ f.next i :=
f.comm _ _
#align homological_complex.hom.comm_from HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm_from
attribute [simp 1100] comm_from_assoc
attribute [simp] comm_from_apply
@[reassoc, elementwise] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem comm_to (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : f.prev j ≫ C₂.dTo j = C₁.dTo j ≫ f.f j :=
f.comm _ _
#align homological_complex.hom.comm_to HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm_to
attribute [simp 1100] comm_to_assoc
attribute [simp] comm_to_apply
/-- A morphism of chain complexes
induces a morphism of arrows of the differentials out of each object.
-/
def sqFrom (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : Arrow.mk (C₁.dFrom i) ⟶ Arrow.mk (C₂.dFrom i) :=
Arrow.homMk (f.comm_from i)
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_from HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqFrom
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_left (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : (f.sqFrom i).left = f.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_from_left HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqFrom_left
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_right (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : (f.sqFrom i).right = f.next i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_from_right HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqFrom_right
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_id (C₁ : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : sqFrom (𝟙 C₁) i = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_from_id HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqFrom_id
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_comp (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
sqFrom (f ≫ g) i = sqFrom f i ≫ sqFrom g i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_from_comp HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqFrom_comp
/-- A morphism of chain complexes
induces a morphism of arrows of the differentials into each object.
-/
def sqTo (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : Arrow.mk (C₁.dTo j) ⟶ Arrow.mk (C₂.dTo j) :=
Arrow.homMk (f.comm_to j)
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_to HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqTo
@[simp]
theorem sqTo_left (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : (f.sqTo j).left = f.prev j :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_to_left HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqTo_left
@[simp]
theorem sqTo_right (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : (f.sqTo j).right = f.f j :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.sq_to_right HomologicalComplex.Hom.sqTo_right
end Hom
end
end HomologicalComplex
namespace ChainComplex
section Of
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
/-- Construct an `α`-indexed chain complex from a dependently-typed differential.
-/
def of (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0) : ChainComplex V α :=
{ X := X
d := fun i j => if h : i = j + 1 then eqToHom (by rw [h]) ≫ d j else 0
shape := fun i j w => by
dsimp
rw [dif_neg (Ne.symm w)]
d_comp_d' := fun i j k hij hjk => by
dsimp at hij hjk
substs hij hjk
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp, dite_eq_ite, ite_true, sq] }
#align chain_complex.of ChainComplex.of
variable (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0)
@[simp]
theorem of_x (n : α) : (of X d sq).X n = X n :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align chain_complex.of_X ChainComplex.of_x
@[simp]
theorem of_d (j : α) : (of X d sq).d (j + 1) j = d j := by
dsimp [of]
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
#align chain_complex.of_d ChainComplex.of_d
theorem of_d_ne {i j : α} (h : i ≠ j + 1) : (of X d sq).d i j = 0 := by
dsimp [of]
rw [dif_neg h]
#align chain_complex.of_d_ne ChainComplex.of_d_ne
end Of
section OfHom
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
variable (X : α → V) (d_X : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq_X : ∀ n, d_X (n + 1) ≫ d_X n = 0) (Y : α → V)
(d_Y : ∀ n, Y (n + 1) ⟶ Y n) (sq_Y : ∀ n, d_Y (n + 1) ≫ d_Y n = 0)
/-- A constructor for chain maps between `α`-indexed chain complexes built using `ChainComplex.of`,
from a dependently typed collection of morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : ∀ i : α, X i ⟶ Y i) (comm : ∀ i : α, f (i + 1) ≫ d_Y i = d_X i ≫ f i) :
of X d_X sq_X ⟶ of Y d_Y sq_Y :=
{ f
comm' := fun n m => by
by_cases h : n = m + 1
· subst h
simpa using comm m
· rw [of_d_ne X _ _ h, of_d_ne Y _ _ h]
simp }
#align chain_complex.of_hom ChainComplex.ofHom
end OfHom
section Mk
variable {V}
variable (X₀ X₁ X₂ : V) (d₀ : X₁ ⟶ X₀) (d₁ : X₂ ⟶ X₁) (s : d₁ ≫ d₀ = 0)
(succ : ∀ (S : ShortComplex V), Σ' (X₃ : V) (d₂ : X₃ ⟶ S.X₁), d₂ ≫ S.f = 0)
/-- Auxiliary definition for `mk`. -/
def mkAux : ℕ → ShortComplex V
| 0 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ s
| n + 1 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ (succ (mkAux n)).2.2
#align chain_complex.mk_aux ChainComplex.mkAux
/-- An inductive constructor for `ℕ`-indexed chain complexes.
You provide explicitly the first two differentials,
then a function which takes two differentials and the fact they compose to zero,
and returns the next object, its differential, and the fact it composes appropriately to zero.
See also `mk'`, which only sees the previous differential in the inductive step.
-/
def mk : ChainComplex V ℕ :=
of (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).X₃) (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).g)
fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).zero
#align chain_complex.mk ChainComplex.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 0 = X₀ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align chain_complex.mk_X_0 ChainComplex.mk_X_0
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_1 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 1 = X₁ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align chain_complex.mk_X_1 ChainComplex.mk_X_1
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_2 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 2 = X₂ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align chain_complex.mk_X_2 ChainComplex.mk_X_2
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologicalComplex.lean | 798 | 800 | theorem mk_d_1_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).d 1 0 = d₀ := by |
change ite (1 = 0 + 1) (𝟙 X₁ ≫ d₀) 0 = d₀
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Alex Meiburg
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
#align_import data.polynomial.erase_lead from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fa256f00ce018e7b40e1dc756e403c86680bf448"
/-!
# Erase the leading term of a univariate polynomial
## Definition
* `eraseLead f`: the polynomial `f - leading term of f`
`eraseLead` serves as reduction step in an induction, shaving off one monomial from a polynomial.
The definition is set up so that it does not mention subtraction in the definition,
and thus works for polynomials over semirings as well as rings.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- `eraseLead f` for a polynomial `f` is the polynomial obtained by
subtracting from `f` the leading term of `f`. -/
def eraseLead (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.erase f.natDegree f
#align polynomial.erase_lead Polynomial.eraseLead
section EraseLead
theorem eraseLead_support (f : R[X]) : f.eraseLead.support = f.support.erase f.natDegree := by
simp only [eraseLead, support_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_support Polynomial.eraseLead_support
theorem eraseLead_coeff (i : ℕ) :
f.eraseLead.coeff i = if i = f.natDegree then 0 else f.coeff i := by
simp only [eraseLead, coeff_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_natDegree : f.eraseLead.coeff f.natDegree = 0 := by simp [eraseLead_coeff]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_natDegree
theorem eraseLead_coeff_of_ne (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ f.natDegree) : f.eraseLead.coeff i = f.coeff i := by
simp [eraseLead_coeff, hi]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_of_ne Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_zero : eraseLead (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp only [eraseLead, erase_zero]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_zero
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (f.monomial_add_erase _)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f.eraseLead :=
(eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mpr (eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff f)).symm
#align polynomial.self_sub_monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff Polynomial.self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_C_mul_X_pow {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f.eraseLead := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.self_sub_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.self_sub_C_mul_X_pow
theorem eraseLead_ne_zero (f0 : 2 ≤ f.support.card) : eraseLead f ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, ← card_support_eq_zero, eraseLead_support]
exact
(zero_lt_one.trans_le <| (tsub_le_tsub_right f0 1).trans Finset.pred_card_le_card_erase).ne.symm
#align polynomial.erase_lead_ne_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_ne_zero
theorem lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a < f.natDegree := by
rw [eraseLead_support, mem_erase] at h
exact (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp a h.2).lt_of_ne h.1
#align polynomial.lt_nat_degree_of_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a ≠ f.natDegree :=
(lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h).ne
#align polynomial.ne_nat_degree_of_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support : f.natDegree ∉ (eraseLead f).support := fun h =>
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_not_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem eraseLead_support_card_lt (h : f ≠ 0) : (eraseLead f).support.card < f.support.card := by
rw [eraseLead_support]
exact card_lt_card (erase_ssubset <| natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_support_card_lt Polynomial.eraseLead_support_card_lt
theorem card_support_eraseLead_add_one (h : f ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.support.card + 1 = f.support.card := by
set c := f.support.card with hc
cases h₁ : c
case zero =>
by_contra
exact h (card_support_eq_zero.mp h₁)
case succ =>
rw [eraseLead_support, card_erase_of_mem (natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h), ← hc, h₁]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_support_eraseLead : f.eraseLead.support.card = f.support.card - 1 := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, eraseLead_zero, support_zero, card_empty]
· rw [← card_support_eraseLead_add_one hf, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem card_support_eraseLead' {c : ℕ} (fc : f.support.card = c + 1) :
f.eraseLead.support.card = c := by
rw [card_support_eraseLead, fc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_card_support' Polynomial.card_support_eraseLead'
theorem card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h₀ : f ≠ 0) (h₁ : f.eraseLead = 0) :
f.support.card = 1 :=
(card_support_eq_zero.mpr h₁ ▸ card_support_eraseLead_add_one h₀).symm
theorem card_support_le_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h : f.eraseLead = 0) : f.support.card ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hpz : f = 0
case pos => simp [hpz]
case neg => exact le_of_eq (card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero hpz h)
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_monomial (i : ℕ) (r : R) : eraseLead (monomial i r) = 0 := by
classical
by_cases hr : r = 0
· subst r
simp only [monomial_zero_right, eraseLead_zero]
· rw [eraseLead, natDegree_monomial, if_neg hr, erase_monomial]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_monomial Polynomial.eraseLead_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_C (r : R) : eraseLead (C r) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_C Polynomial.eraseLead_C
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X : eraseLead (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_X Polynomial.eraseLead_X
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X_pow (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (X ^ n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_X_pow Polynomial.eraseLead_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (C r * X ^ n) = 0 := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp] lemma eraseLead_C_mul_X (r : R) : eraseLead (C r * X) = 0 := by
simpa using eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow _ 1
theorem eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_left {p q : R[X]} (pq : q.natDegree < p.natDegree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p.eraseLead + q := by
ext n
by_cases nd : n = p.natDegree
· rw [nd, eraseLead_coeff, if_pos (natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm]
simpa using (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm
· rw [eraseLead_coeff, coeff_add, coeff_add, eraseLead_coeff, if_neg, if_neg nd]
rintro rfl
exact nd (natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt pq)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_of_nat_degree_lt_left Polynomial.eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_left
theorem eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_right {p q : R[X]} (pq : p.natDegree < q.natDegree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p + q.eraseLead := by
ext n
by_cases nd : n = q.natDegree
· rw [nd, eraseLead_coeff, if_pos (natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm]
simpa using (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm
· rw [eraseLead_coeff, coeff_add, coeff_add, eraseLead_coeff, if_neg, if_neg nd]
rintro rfl
exact nd (natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt pq)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_of_nat_degree_lt_right Polynomial.eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_right
theorem eraseLead_degree_le : (eraseLead f).degree ≤ f.degree :=
f.degree_erase_le _
#align polynomial.erase_lead_degree_le Polynomial.eraseLead_degree_le
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux : (eraseLead f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree :=
natDegree_le_natDegree eraseLead_degree_le
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_le_aux Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_lt (f0 : 2 ≤ f.support.card) : (eraseLead f).natDegree < f.natDegree :=
lt_of_le_of_ne eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux <|
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support <|
natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero <| eraseLead_ne_zero f0
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_lt
theorem natDegree_pos_of_eraseLead_ne_zero (h : f.eraseLead ≠ 0) : 0 < f.natDegree := by
by_contra h₂
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_not_pos h₂)] at h
simp at h
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero (f : R[X]) :
(eraseLead f).natDegree < f.natDegree ∨ f.eraseLead = 0 := by
by_cases h : f.support.card ≤ 1
· right
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self h]
simp
· left
apply eraseLead_natDegree_lt (lt_of_not_ge h)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_lt_or_erase_lead_eq_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_le (f : R[X]) : (eraseLead f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree - 1 := by
rcases f.eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero with (h | h)
· exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt h
· simp only [h, natDegree_zero, zero_le]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_le Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_le
lemma natDegree_eraseLead (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) : f.eraseLead.natDegree = f.natDegree - 1 := by
have := natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
refine f.eraseLead_natDegree_le.antisymm $ le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ?_
rwa [eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self _ _).ne, ← nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos]
all_goals positivity
lemma natDegree_eraseLead_add_one (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.natDegree + 1 = f.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_eraseLead h, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_eraseLead_le_of_nextCoeff_eq_zero (h : f.nextCoeff = 0) :
f.eraseLead.natDegree ≤ f.natDegree - 2 := by
refine natDegree_le_pred (n := f.natDegree - 1) (eraseLead_natDegree_le f) ?_
rw [nextCoeff_eq_zero, natDegree_eq_zero] at h
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ | ⟨hf, h⟩ := h
· simp
rw [eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self hf zero_lt_one).ne, ← nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos hf]
simp [nextCoeff_eq_zero, h, eq_zero_or_pos]
lemma two_le_natDegree_of_nextCoeff_eraseLead (hlead : f.eraseLead ≠ 0) (hnext : f.nextCoeff = 0) :
2 ≤ f.natDegree := by
contrapose! hlead
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero, natDegree_eq_one]
at hlead
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, ha, b, rfl⟩ := hlead
· simp
· rw [nextCoeff_C_mul_X_add_C ha] at hnext
subst b
simp
theorem leadingCoeff_eraseLead_eq_nextCoeff (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.leadingCoeff = f.nextCoeff := by
have := natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
rw [leadingCoeff, nextCoeff, natDegree_eraseLead h, if_neg,
eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self _ _).ne]
all_goals positivity
theorem nextCoeff_eq_zero_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h : f.eraseLead = 0) : f.nextCoeff = 0 := by
by_contra h₂
exact leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mp (leadingCoeff_eraseLead_eq_nextCoeff h₂ ▸ h₂) h
end EraseLead
/-- An induction lemma for polynomials. It takes a natural number `N` as a parameter, that is
required to be at least as big as the `nat_degree` of the polynomial. This is useful to prove
results where you want to change each term in a polynomial to something else depending on the
`nat_degree` of the polynomial itself and not on the specific `nat_degree` of each term. -/
theorem induction_with_natDegree_le (P : R[X] → Prop) (N : ℕ) (P_0 : P 0)
(P_C_mul_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ r : R, r ≠ 0 → n ≤ N → P (C r * X ^ n))
(P_C_add : ∀ f g : R[X], f.natDegree < g.natDegree → g.natDegree ≤ N → P f → P g → P (f + g)) :
∀ f : R[X], f.natDegree ≤ N → P f := by
intro f df
generalize hd : card f.support = c
revert f
induction' c with c hc
· intro f _ f0
convert P_0
simpa [support_eq_empty, card_eq_zero] using f0
· intro f df f0
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow f]
cases c
· convert P_C_mul_pow f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff ?_ df using 1
· convert zero_add (C (leadingCoeff f) * X ^ f.natDegree)
rw [← card_support_eq_zero, card_support_eraseLead' f0]
· rw [leadingCoeff_ne_zero, Ne, ← card_support_eq_zero, f0]
exact zero_ne_one.symm
refine P_C_add f.eraseLead _ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine (eraseLead_natDegree_lt ?_).trans_le (le_of_eq ?_)
· exact (Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.zero_le _))).trans f0.ge
· rw [natDegree_C_mul_X_pow _ _ (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr _)]
rintro rfl
simp at f0
· exact (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le f.leadingCoeff f.natDegree).trans df
· exact hc _ (eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux.trans df) (card_support_eraseLead' f0)
· refine P_C_mul_pow _ _ ?_ df
rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← card_support_eq_zero, f0]
exact Nat.succ_ne_zero _
#align polynomial.induction_with_nat_degree_le Polynomial.induction_with_natDegree_le
/-- Let `φ : R[x] → S[x]` be an additive map, `k : ℕ` a bound, and `fu : ℕ → ℕ` a
"sufficiently monotone" map. Assume also that
* `φ` maps to `0` all monomials of degree less than `k`,
* `φ` maps each monomial `m` in `R[x]` to a polynomial `φ m` of degree `fu (deg m)`.
Then, `φ` maps each polynomial `p` in `R[x]` to a polynomial of degree `fu (deg p)`. -/
theorem mono_map_natDegree_eq {S F : Type*} [Semiring S]
[FunLike F R[X] S[X]] [AddMonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] {φ : F}
{p : R[X]} (k : ℕ) (fu : ℕ → ℕ) (fu0 : ∀ {n}, n ≤ k → fu n = 0)
(fc : ∀ {n m}, k ≤ n → n < m → fu n < fu m) (φ_k : ∀ {f : R[X]}, f.natDegree < k → φ f = 0)
(φ_mon_nat : ∀ n c, c ≠ 0 → (φ (monomial n c)).natDegree = fu n) :
(φ p).natDegree = fu p.natDegree := by
refine induction_with_natDegree_le (fun p => (φ p).natDegree = fu p.natDegree)
p.natDegree (by simp [fu0]) ?_ ?_ _ rfl.le
· intro n r r0 _
rw [natDegree_C_mul_X_pow _ _ r0, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, φ_mon_nat _ _ r0]
· intro f g fg _ fk gk
rw [natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt fg, _root_.map_add]
by_cases FG : k ≤ f.natDegree
· rw [natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt, gk]
rw [fk, gk]
exact fc FG fg
· cases k
· exact (FG (Nat.zero_le _)).elim
· rwa [φ_k (not_le.mp FG), zero_add]
#align polynomial.mono_map_nat_degree_eq Polynomial.mono_map_natDegree_eq
theorem map_natDegree_eq_sub {S F : Type*} [Semiring S]
[FunLike F R[X] S[X]] [AddMonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] {φ : F}
{p : R[X]} {k : ℕ} (φ_k : ∀ f : R[X], f.natDegree < k → φ f = 0)
(φ_mon : ∀ n c, c ≠ 0 → (φ (monomial n c)).natDegree = n - k) :
(φ p).natDegree = p.natDegree - k :=
mono_map_natDegree_eq k (fun j => j - k) (by simp_all)
(@fun m n h => (tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right h).mpr)
(φ_k _) φ_mon
#align polynomial.map_nat_degree_eq_sub Polynomial.map_natDegree_eq_sub
theorem map_natDegree_eq_natDegree {S F : Type*} [Semiring S]
[FunLike F R[X] S[X]] [AddMonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]]
{φ : F} (p) (φ_mon_nat : ∀ n c, c ≠ 0 → (φ (monomial n c)).natDegree = n) :
(φ p).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
(map_natDegree_eq_sub (fun f h => (Nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim) (by simpa)).trans
p.natDegree.sub_zero
#align polynomial.map_nat_degree_eq_nat_degree Polynomial.map_natDegree_eq_natDegree
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/EraseLead.lean | 363 | 375 | theorem card_support_eq' {n : ℕ} (k : Fin n → ℕ) (x : Fin n → R) (hk : Function.Injective k)
(hx : ∀ i, x i ≠ 0) : (∑ i, C (x i) * X ^ k i).support.card = n := by |
suffices (∑ i, C (x i) * X ^ k i).support = image k univ by
rw [this, univ.card_image_of_injective hk, card_fin]
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support_iff, finset_sum_coeff, coeff_C_mul_X_pow, mem_image,
mem_univ, true_and]
refine fun i => ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨j, _, h⟩ := exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero h
exact ⟨j, (ite_ne_right_iff.mp h).1.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨j, _, rfl⟩
rw [sum_eq_single_of_mem j (mem_univ j), if_pos rfl]
· exact hx j
· exact fun m _ hmj => if_neg fun h => hmj.symm (hk h)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.IdentDistrib
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.FloorPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
#align_import probability.strong_law from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# The strong law of large numbers
We prove the strong law of large numbers, in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae`:
If `X n` is a sequence of independent identically distributed integrable random
variables, then `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`.
We give here the strong version, due to Etemadi, that only requires pairwise independence.
This file also contains the Lᵖ version of the strong law of large numbers provided by
`ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_Lp` which shows `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges in Lᵖ to
`𝔼[X 0]` provided `X n` is independent identically distributed and is Lᵖ.
## Implementation
The main point is to prove the result for real-valued random variables, as the general case
of Banach-space valued random variables follows from this case and approximation by simple
functions. The real version is given in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae_real`.
We follow the proof by Etemadi
[Etemadi, *An elementary proof of the strong law of large numbers*][etemadi_strong_law],
which goes as follows.
It suffices to prove the result for nonnegative `X`, as one can prove the general result by
splitting a general `X` into its positive part and negative part.
Consider `Xₙ` a sequence of nonnegative integrable identically distributed pairwise independent
random variables. Let `Yₙ` be the truncation of `Xₙ` up to `n`. We claim that
* Almost surely, `Xₙ = Yₙ` for all but finitely many indices. Indeed, `∑ ℙ (Xₙ ≠ Yₙ)` is bounded by
`1 + 𝔼[X]` (see `sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le` and `tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top`).
* Let `c > 1`. Along the sequence `n = c ^ k`, then `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ])/n` converges almost
surely to `0`. This follows from a variance control, as
```
∑_k ℙ (|∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ]| > c^k ε)
≤ ∑_k (c^k ε)^{-2} ∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Var[Yᵢ] (by Markov inequality)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) Var[Yᵢ] (as ∑_{c^k > i} 1/(c^k)^2 ≤ C/i^2)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) 𝔼[Yᵢ^2]
≤ 2C 𝔼[X^2] (see `sum_variance_truncation_le`)
```
* As `𝔼[Yᵢ]` converges to `𝔼[X]`, it follows from the two previous items and Cesàro that, along
the sequence `n = c^k`, one has `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ) / n → 𝔼[X]` almost surely.
* To generalize it to all indices, we use the fact that `∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ` is nondecreasing and
that, if `c` is close enough to `1`, the gap between `c^k` and `c^(k+1)` is small.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Asymptotics
open Set (indicator)
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-! ### Prerequisites on truncations -/
section Truncation
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Truncating a real-valued function to the interval `(-A, A]`. -/
def truncation (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) :=
indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id ∘ f
#align probability_theory.truncation ProbabilityTheory.truncation
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{A : ℝ} : AEStronglyMeasurable (truncation f A) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable _ hf.aemeasurable
exact (stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc).aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.truncation MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation
theorem abs_truncation_le_bound (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |A| := by
simp only [truncation, Set.indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_le_abs h.2 (neg_le.2 h.1.le)
· simp [abs_nonneg]
#align probability_theory.abs_truncation_le_bound ProbabilityTheory.abs_truncation_le_bound
@[simp]
theorem truncation_zero (f : α → ℝ) : truncation f 0 = 0 := by simp [truncation]; rfl
#align probability_theory.truncation_zero ProbabilityTheory.truncation_zero
theorem abs_truncation_le_abs_self (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |f x| := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· simp [abs_nonneg]
#align probability_theory.abs_truncation_le_abs_self ProbabilityTheory.abs_truncation_le_abs_self
theorem truncation_eq_self {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} {x : α} (h : |f x| < A) :
truncation f A x = f x := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro H
apply H.elim
simp [(abs_lt.1 h).1, (abs_lt.1 h).2.le]
#align probability_theory.truncation_eq_self ProbabilityTheory.truncation_eq_self
theorem truncation_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} (h : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
truncation f A = indicator (Set.Ioc 0 A) id ∘ f := by
ext x
rcases (h x).lt_or_eq with (hx | hx)
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, Set.mem_Ioc, id, Function.comp_apply, true_and_iff]
by_cases h'x : f x ≤ A
· have : -A < f x := by linarith [h x]
simp only [this, true_and_iff]
· simp only [h'x, and_false_iff]
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_self]
#align probability_theory.truncation_eq_of_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.truncation_eq_of_nonneg
theorem truncation_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (A : ℝ) {x : α} (h : 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ truncation f A x :=
Set.indicator_apply_nonneg fun _ => h
#align probability_theory.truncation_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.truncation_nonneg
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.memℒp_truncation [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0∞} : Memℒp (truncation f A) p μ :=
Memℒp.of_bound hf.truncation |A| (eventually_of_forall fun _ => abs_truncation_le_bound _ _ _)
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.mem_ℒp_truncation MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.memℒp_truncation
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integrable_truncation [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} : Integrable (truncation f A) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]; exact hf.memℒp_truncation
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.integrable_truncation MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integrable_truncation
theorem moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} (hA : 0 ≤ A)
{n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ^ n ∂μ = ∫ y in -A..A, y ^ n ∂Measure.map f μ := by
have M : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc (-A) A) := measurableSet_Ioc
change ∫ x, (fun z => indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id z ^ n) (f x) ∂μ = _
rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le,
← integral_indicator M]
· simp only [indicator, zero_pow hn, id, ite_pow]
· linarith
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
#align probability_theory.moment_truncation_eq_interval_integral ProbabilityTheory.moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral
theorem moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
{n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h'f : 0 ≤ f) :
∫ x, truncation f A x ^ n ∂μ = ∫ y in (0)..A, y ^ n ∂Measure.map f μ := by
have M : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc 0 A) := measurableSet_Ioc
have M' : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc A 0) := measurableSet_Ioc
rw [truncation_eq_of_nonneg h'f]
change ∫ x, (fun z => indicator (Set.Ioc 0 A) id z ^ n) (f x) ∂μ = _
rcases le_or_lt 0 A with (hA | hA)
· rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hA,
← integral_indicator M]
· simp only [indicator, zero_pow hn, id, ite_pow]
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
· rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_ge hA.le,
← integral_indicator M']
· simp only [Set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le hA.le, zero_pow hn, Set.indicator_empty, integral_zero,
zero_eq_neg]
apply integral_eq_zero_of_ae
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂Measure.map f μ, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x :=
(ae_map_iff hf.aemeasurable measurableSet_Ici).2 (eventually_of_forall h'f)
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
simp only [indicator, Set.mem_Ioc, Pi.zero_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, and_imp]
intro _ h''x
have : x = 0 := by linarith
simp [this, zero_pow hn]
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
#align probability_theory.moment_truncation_eq_interval_integral_of_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg
theorem integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
(hA : 0 ≤ A) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ = ∫ y in -A..A, y ∂Measure.map f μ := by
simpa using moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral hf hA one_ne_zero
#align probability_theory.integral_truncation_eq_interval_integral ProbabilityTheory.integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral
theorem integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
(h'f : 0 ≤ f) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ = ∫ y in (0)..A, y ∂Measure.map f μ := by
simpa using moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hf one_ne_zero h'f
#align probability_theory.integral_truncation_eq_interval_integral_of_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg
theorem integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg (hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : 0 ≤ f) {A : ℝ} :
∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
apply integral_mono_of_nonneg
(eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_) hf (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
· exact truncation_nonneg _ (h'f x)
· calc
truncation f A x ≤ |truncation f A x| := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ |f x| := abs_truncation_le_abs_self _ _ _
_ = f x := abs_of_nonneg (h'f x)
#align probability_theory.integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg
/-- If a function is integrable, then the integral of its truncated versions converges to the
integral of the whole function. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_truncation {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun A => ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun x => abs (f x)) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact eventually_of_forall fun A ↦ hf.aestronglyMeasurable.truncation
· filter_upwards with A
filter_upwards with x
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_truncation_le_abs_self _ _ _
· exact hf.abs
· filter_upwards with x
apply tendsto_const_nhds.congr' _
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop (abs (f x))] with A hA
exact (truncation_eq_self hA).symm
#align probability_theory.tendsto_integral_truncation ProbabilityTheory.tendsto_integral_truncation
theorem IdentDistrib.truncation {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ}
{g : β → ℝ} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) {A : ℝ} :
IdentDistrib (truncation f A) (truncation g A) μ ν :=
h.comp (measurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc)
#align probability_theory.ident_distrib.truncation ProbabilityTheory.IdentDistrib.truncation
end Truncation
section StrongLawAeReal
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasureSpace Ω] [IsProbabilityMeasure (ℙ : Measure Ω)]
section MomentEstimates
theorem sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) {K : ℕ} {N : ℕ}
(hKN : K ≤ N) :
∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) := by
let ρ : Measure ℝ := Measure.map X ℙ
haveI : IsProbabilityMeasure ρ := isProbabilityMeasure_map hint.aemeasurable
have A : ∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in j..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ ≤ 𝔼[X] + 1 :=
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in j..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ =
∑ j ∈ range K, ∑ i ∈ Ico j N, ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
apply sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals_Ico ((mem_range.1 hj).le.trans hKN)]
intro k _
exact continuous_const.intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∑ i ∈ range N, ∑ j ∈ range (min (i + 1) K), ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
simp_rw [sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
aesop (add simp Nat.lt_succ_iff)
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range N, (i + 1) * ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_min]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_left _ _) ?_
apply intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg
· simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
· simp only [zero_le_one, imp_true_iff]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range N, ∫ x in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), x + 1 ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
have I : (i : ℝ) ≤ (i + 1 : ℕ) := by
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le I, ← integral_mul_left]
apply setIntegral_mono_on
· exact continuous_const.integrableOn_Ioc
· exact (continuous_id.add continuous_const).integrableOn_Ioc
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
· intro x hx
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Set.mem_Ioc] at hx
simp [hx.1.le]
_ = ∫ x in (0)..N, x + 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals fun k _ => ?_]
· norm_cast
· exact (continuous_id.add continuous_const).intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∫ x in (0)..N, x ∂ρ + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add]
· exact continuous_id.intervalIntegrable _ _
· exact continuous_const.intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = 𝔼[truncation X N] + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hint.1 hnonneg]
_ ≤ 𝔼[X] + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ :=
(add_le_add_right (integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg hint hnonneg) _)
_ ≤ 𝔼[X] + 1 := by
refine add_le_add le_rfl ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (Nat.cast_nonneg _)]
simp only [integral_const, Measure.restrict_apply', measurableSet_Ioc, Set.univ_inter,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [← ENNReal.one_toReal]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono ENNReal.one_ne_top prob_le_one
have B : ∀ a b, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc a b} = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in Set.Ioc a b, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
intro a b
rw [ofReal_setIntegral_one ρ _,
Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable hint.aemeasurable measurableSet_Ioc]
rfl
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N} =
∑ j ∈ range K, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by simp_rw [B]
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_sum_of_nonneg]
simp only [integral_const, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg,
imp_true_iff]
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in (j : ℝ)..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
congr 1
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 ((mem_range.1 hj).le.trans hKN))]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) := ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal A
#align probability_theory.sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le ProbabilityTheory.sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le
| Mathlib/Probability/StrongLaw.lean | 304 | 326 | theorem tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) :
(∑' j : ℕ, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)}) < ∞ := by |
suffices ∀ K : ℕ, ∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) from
(le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto (ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum _) tendsto_const_nhds
(eventually_of_forall this)).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
intro K
have A : Tendsto (fun N : ℕ => ∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N}) atTop
(𝓝 (∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)})) := by
refine tendsto_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
have : {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (i : ℝ)} = ⋃ N : ℕ, {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (i : ℝ) N} := by
apply Set.Subset.antisymm _ _
· intro ω hω
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, X ω ≤ N := exists_nat_ge (X ω)
exact Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨N, hω, hN⟩
· simp (config := {contextual := true}) only [Set.mem_Ioc, Set.mem_Ioi,
Set.iUnion_subset_iff, Set.setOf_subset_setOf, imp_true_iff]
rw [this]
apply tendsto_measure_iUnion
intro m n hmn x hx
exact ⟨hx.1, hx.2.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 hmn)⟩
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto A tendsto_const_nhds
filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop K] with N hN
exact sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le hint hnonneg hN
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
#align_import field_theory.ratfunc from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf9bbbcf0c1c1ead18280b0d010e417b10abb1b6"
/-!
# The field structure of rational functions
## Main definitions
Working with rational functions as polynomials:
- `RatFunc.instField` provides a field structure
You can use `IsFractionRing` API to treat `RatFunc` as the field of fractions of polynomials:
* `algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps polynomials to rational functions
* `IsFractionRing.algEquiv` maps other fields of fractions of `K[X]` to `RatFunc K`,
in particular:
* `FractionRing.algEquiv K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps the generic field of
fraction construction to `RatFunc K`. Combine this with `AlgEquiv.restrictScalars` to change
the `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K[X]] RatFunc K` to `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K] RatFunc K`.
Working with rational functions as fractions:
- `RatFunc.num` and `RatFunc.denom` give the numerator and denominator.
These values are chosen to be coprime and such that `RatFunc.denom` is monic.
Lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other types, by mapping and dividing, as long
as the homomorphism retains the non-zero-divisor property:
- `RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom` lifts a `K[X] →*₀ G₀` to
a `RatFunc K →*₀ G₀`, where `[CommRing K] [CommGroupWithZero G₀]`
- `RatFunc.liftRingHom` lifts a `K[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc K →+* L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L]`
- `RatFunc.liftAlgHom` lifts a `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] [Algebra S L]`
This is satisfied by injective homs.
We also have lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other polynomials,
with the same condition on retaining the non-zero-divisor property across the map:
- `RatFunc.map` lifts `K[X] →* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapRingHom` lifts `K[X] →+* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapAlgHom` lifts `K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]` when
`[CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]`
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Field
variable [CommRing K]
/-- The zero rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def zero : RatFunc K :=
⟨0⟩
#align ratfunc.zero RatFunc.zero
instance : Zero (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.zero⟩
-- Porting note: added `OfNat.ofNat`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [zero_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_zero : (ofFractionRing 0 : RatFunc K) = 0 := by
simp only [Zero.zero, OfNat.ofNat, RatFunc.zero]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_zero RatFunc.ofFractionRing_zero
/-- Addition of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def add : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p + q⟩
#align ratfunc.add RatFunc.add
instance : Add (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.add⟩
-- Porting note: added `HAdd.hAdd`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [add_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_add (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p + q) = ofFractionRing p + ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add, RatFunc.add]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_add RatFunc.ofFractionRing_add
/-- Subtraction of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def sub : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p - q⟩
#align ratfunc.sub RatFunc.sub
instance : Sub (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.sub⟩
-- Porting note: added `HSub.hSub`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [sub_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_sub (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p - q) = ofFractionRing p - ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [Sub.sub, HSub.hSub, RatFunc.sub]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_sub RatFunc.ofFractionRing_sub
/-- Additive inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def neg : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨-p⟩
#align ratfunc.neg RatFunc.neg
instance : Neg (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.neg⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_neg (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (-p) = -ofFractionRing p := by simp only [Neg.neg, RatFunc.neg]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_neg RatFunc.ofFractionRing_neg
/-- The multiplicative unit of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def one : RatFunc K :=
⟨1⟩
#align ratfunc.one RatFunc.one
instance : One (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.one⟩
-- Porting note: added `OfNat.ofNat`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [one_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_one : (ofFractionRing 1 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by
simp only [One.one, OfNat.ofNat, RatFunc.one]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_one RatFunc.ofFractionRing_one
/-- Multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def mul : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p * q⟩
#align ratfunc.mul RatFunc.mul
instance : Mul (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.mul⟩
-- Porting note: added `HMul.hMul`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [mul_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_mul (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p * q) = ofFractionRing p * ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [Mul.mul, HMul.hMul, RatFunc.mul]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_mul RatFunc.ofFractionRing_mul
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
/-- Division of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def div : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p / q⟩
#align ratfunc.div RatFunc.div
instance : Div (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.div⟩
-- Porting note: added `HDiv.hDiv`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [div_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_div (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p / q) = ofFractionRing p / ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [Div.div, HDiv.hDiv, RatFunc.div]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_div RatFunc.ofFractionRing_div
/-- Multiplicative inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def inv : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p⁻¹⟩
#align ratfunc.inv RatFunc.inv
instance : Inv (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.inv⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_inv (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing p⁻¹ = (ofFractionRing p)⁻¹ := by
simp only [Inv.inv, RatFunc.inv]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_inv RatFunc.ofFractionRing_inv
-- Auxiliary lemma for the `Field` instance
theorem mul_inv_cancel : ∀ {p : RatFunc K}, p ≠ 0 → p * p⁻¹ = 1
| ⟨p⟩, h => by
have : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h <| by rw [hp, ofFractionRing_zero]
simpa only [← ofFractionRing_inv, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_one,
ofFractionRing.injEq] using -- Porting note: `ofFractionRing.injEq` was not present
_root_.mul_inv_cancel this
#align ratfunc.mul_inv_cancel RatFunc.mul_inv_cancel
end IsDomain
section SMul
variable {R : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : R → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| r, ⟨p⟩ => ⟨r • p⟩
#align ratfunc.smul RatFunc.smul
-- cannot reproduce
--@[nolint fails_quickly] -- Porting note: `linter 'fails_quickly' not found`
instance [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : SMul R (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.smul⟩
-- Porting note: added `SMul.hSMul`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [smul_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (c • p) = c • ofFractionRing p := by
simp only [SMul.smul, HSMul.hSMul, RatFunc.smul]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_smul RatFunc.ofFractionRing_smul
theorem toFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : RatFunc K) :
toFractionRing (c • p) = c • toFractionRing p := by
cases p
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul]
#align ratfunc.to_fraction_ring_smul RatFunc.toFractionRing_smul
theorem smul_eq_C_smul (x : RatFunc K) (r : K) : r • x = Polynomial.C r • x := by
cases' x with x
-- Porting note: had to specify the induction principle manually
induction x using Localization.induction_on
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul, ← ofFractionRing_smul, Localization.smul_mk,
Localization.smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, Polynomial.smul_eq_C_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ratfunc.smul_eq_C_smul RatFunc.smul_eq_C_smul
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
variable [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]]
variable [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]]
theorem mk_smul (c : R) (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk (c • p) q = c • RatFunc.mk p q := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mk_zero, mk_zero, ← ofFractionRing_smul, smul_zero]
· rw [mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, ← Localization.smul_mk, ←
ofFractionRing_smul]
#align ratfunc.mk_smul RatFunc.mk_smul
instance : IsScalarTower R K[X] (RatFunc K) :=
⟨fun c p q => q.induction_on' fun q r _ => by rw [← mk_smul, smul_assoc, mk_smul, mk_smul]⟩
end IsDomain
end SMul
variable (K)
instance [Subsingleton K] : Subsingleton (RatFunc K) :=
toFractionRing_injective.subsingleton
instance : Inhabited (RatFunc K) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNontrivial [Nontrivial K] : Nontrivial (RatFunc K) :=
ofFractionRing_injective.nontrivial
#align ratfunc.nontrivial RatFunc.instNontrivial
/-- `RatFunc K` is isomorphic to the field of fractions of `K[X]`, as rings.
This is an auxiliary definition; `simp`-normal form is `IsLocalization.algEquiv`.
-/
@[simps apply]
def toFractionRingRingEquiv : RatFunc K ≃+* FractionRing K[X] where
toFun := toFractionRing
invFun := ofFractionRing
left_inv := fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_add' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_mul]
#align ratfunc.to_fraction_ring_ring_equiv RatFunc.toFractionRingRingEquiv
end Field
section TacticInterlude
-- Porting note: reimplemented the `frac_tac` and `smul_tac` as close to the originals as I could
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by working in `FractionRing K[X]`. -/
macro "frac_tac" : tactic => `(tactic| repeat (rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _)) <;>
try simp only [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_sub,
← ofFractionRing_neg, ← ofFractionRing_one, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_div,
← ofFractionRing_inv,
add_assoc, zero_add, add_zero, mul_assoc, mul_zero, mul_one, mul_add, inv_zero,
add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, div_eq_mul_inv,
add_mul, zero_mul, one_mul, neg_mul, mul_neg, add_right_neg])
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by applying `RatFunc.induction_on`. -/
macro "smul_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
repeat
(first
| rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _)
| intro) <;>
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_smul] <;>
simp only [add_comm, mul_comm, zero_smul, succ_nsmul, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_add, mul_one, mul_zero,
neg_add, mul_neg,
Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_zero, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
Int.cast_negSucc, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_succ,
Localization.mk_zero, Localization.add_mk_self, Localization.neg_mk,
ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_neg])
end TacticInterlude
section CommRing
variable (K) [CommRing K]
-- Porting note: split the CommRing instance up into multiple defs because it was hard to see
-- if the big instance declaration made any progress.
/-- `RatFunc K` is a commutative monoid.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (RatFunc K) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc := by frac_tac
mul_comm := by frac_tac
one := 1
one_mul := by frac_tac
mul_one := by frac_tac
npow := npowRec
/-- `RatFunc K` is an additive commutative group.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (RatFunc K) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by frac_tac
-- Porting note: `by frac_tac` didn't work:
add_comm := by repeat rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _) <;> simp only [← ofFractionRing_add, add_comm]
zero := 0
zero_add := by frac_tac
add_zero := by frac_tac
neg := Neg.neg
add_left_neg := by frac_tac
sub := Sub.sub
sub_eq_add_neg := by frac_tac
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by smul_tac
nsmul_succ _ := by smul_tac
zsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul_zero' := by smul_tac
zsmul_succ' _ := by smul_tac
zsmul_neg' _ := by smul_tac
instance instCommRing : CommRing (RatFunc K) :=
{ instCommMonoid K, instAddCommGroup K with
zero := 0
sub := Sub.sub
zero_mul := by frac_tac
mul_zero := by frac_tac
left_distrib := by frac_tac
right_distrib := by frac_tac
one := 1
nsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul := (· • ·)
npow := npowRec }
#align ratfunc.comm_ring RatFunc.instCommRing
variable {K}
section LiftHom
open RatFunc
variable {G₀ L R S F : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero G₀] [Field L] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable [FunLike F R[X] S[X]]
/-- Lift a monoid homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def map [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →* RatFunc S where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f
(fun n d => if h : φ d ∈ S[X]⁰ then ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, h⟩) else 0)
fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
beta_reduce -- Porting note(#12129): force the function to be applied
rw [dif_pos, dif_pos]
on_goal 1 =>
congr 1 -- Porting note: this was a `rw [ofFractionRing.inj_eq]` which was overkill anyway
rw [Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff]
rotate_left
· exact hφ hq
· exact hφ hq'
refine Localization.r_of_eq ?_
simpa only [map_mul] using congr_arg φ h
map_one' := by
beta_reduce -- Porting note(#12129): force the function to be applied
rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, dif_pos]
· simpa using ofFractionRing_one
· simpa using Submonoid.one_mem _
map_mul' x y := by
beta_reduce -- Porting note(#12129): force the function to be applied
cases' x with x; cases' y with y
-- Porting note: added `using Localization.rec` (`Localization.induction_on` didn't work)
induction' x using Localization.rec with p q
· induction' y using Localization.rec with p' q'
· have hq : φ q ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q.prop
have hq' : φ q' ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q'.prop
have hqq' : φ ↑(q * q') ∈ S[X]⁰ := by simpa using Submonoid.mul_mem _ hq hq'
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, dif_pos hq,
dif_pos hq', dif_pos hqq', ← ofFractionRing_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, map_mul,
Localization.mk_mul, Submonoid.mk_mul_mk]
· rfl
· rfl
#align ratfunc.map RatFunc.map
theorem map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F)
(hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
map φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) =
ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, hφ d.prop⟩) := by
-- Porting note: replaced `convert` with `refine Eq.trans`
refine (liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk n _ _ _).trans ?_
rw [dif_pos]
#align ratfunc.map_apply_of_fraction_ring_mk RatFunc.map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk
theorem map_injective [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ)
(hf : Function.Injective φ) : Function.Injective (map φ hφ) := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h
-- Porting note: had to hint `induction` which induction principle to use
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
simpa only [map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, ofFractionRing_injective.eq_iff,
Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff, Localization.r_iff_exists, mul_cancel_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors,
exists_const, ← map_mul, hf.eq_iff] using h
#align ratfunc.map_injective RatFunc.map_injective
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →+* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapRingHom [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S :=
{ map φ hφ with
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, ← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰),
← Localization.mk_zero (1 : S[X]⁰), map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, map_zero,
Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.mk'_zero]
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
-- Porting note: had to hint `induction` which induction principle to use
induction x using Localization.rec
induction y using Localization.rec
· simp only [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk, map_add, map_mul,
MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul]
-- Porting note: `Submonoid.mk_mul_mk` couldn't be applied: motive incorrect,
-- even though it is a rfl lemma.
rfl
· rfl
· rfl }
#align ratfunc.map_ring_hom RatFunc.mapRingHom
theorem coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
(mapRingHom φ hφ : RatFunc R → RatFunc S) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
#align ratfunc.coe_map_ring_hom_eq_coe_map RatFunc.coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map
-- TODO: Generalize to `FunLike` classes,
/-- Lift a monoid with zero homomorphism `R[X] →*₀ G₀` to a `RatFunc R →*₀ G₀`
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftMonoidWithZeroHom (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →*₀ G₀ where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f (fun p q => φ p / φ q) fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim p q, Subsingleton.elim p' q, Subsingleton.elim q' q]
rw [div_eq_div_iff, ← map_mul, mul_comm p, h, map_mul, mul_comm] <;>
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ ‹_›)
map_one' := by
dsimp only -- Porting note: force the function to be applied (not just beta reduction!)
rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk]
simp only [map_one, OneMemClass.coe_one, div_one]
map_mul' x y := by
cases' x with x
cases' y with y
induction' x using Localization.rec with p q
· induction' y using Localization.rec with p' q'
· rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul]
simp only [liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, div_mul_div_comm, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
· rfl
· rfl
map_zero' := by
beta_reduce -- Porting note(#12129): force the function to be applied
rw [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰), liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk]
simp only [map_zero, zero_div]
#align ratfunc.lift_monoid_with_zero_hom RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ)
(n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk _ _ _ _
#align ratfunc.lift_monoid_with_zero_hom_apply_of_fraction_ring_mk RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ') := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with a
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with a'
simp_rw [liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
intro h
congr 1
refine Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr (Localization.r_of_eq (M := R[X]) ?_)
have := mul_eq_mul_of_div_eq_div _ _ ?_ ?_ h
· rwa [← map_mul, ← map_mul, hφ.eq_iff, mul_comm, mul_comm a'.fst] at this
all_goals exact map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _)
#align ratfunc.lift_monoid_with_zero_hom_injective RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective
/-- Lift an injective ring homomorphism `R[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc R →+* L`
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftRingHom (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →+* L :=
{ liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ.toMonoidWithZeroHom hφ with
map_add' := fun x y => by
-- Porting note: used to invoke `MonoidWithZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe`
simp only [ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidWithZeroHom.toZeroHom_coe]
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim (x + y) y, Subsingleton.elim x 0, map_zero, zero_add]
cases' x with x
cases' y with y
-- Porting note: had to add the recursor explicitly below
induction' x using Localization.rec with p q
· induction' y using Localization.rec with p' q'
· rw [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk]
simp only [RingHom.toMonoidWithZeroHom_eq_coe,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
rw [div_add_div, div_eq_div_iff]
· rw [mul_comm _ p, mul_comm _ p', mul_comm _ (φ p'), add_comm]
simp only [map_add, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
all_goals
try simp only [← map_mul, ← Submonoid.coe_mul]
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _))
· rfl
· rfl }
#align ratfunc.lift_ring_hom RatFunc.liftRingHom
theorem liftRingHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X])
(d : R[X]⁰) : liftRingHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ hφ _ _
#align ratfunc.lift_ring_hom_apply_of_fraction_ring_mk RatFunc.liftRingHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk
theorem liftRingHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftRingHom φ hφ') :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective _ hφ
#align ratfunc.lift_ring_hom_injective RatFunc.liftRingHom_injective
end LiftHom
variable (K)
instance instField [IsDomain K] : Field (RatFunc K) where
-- Porting note: used to be `by frac_tac`
inv_zero := by rw [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_inv, inv_zero]
div := (· / ·)
div_eq_mul_inv := by frac_tac
mul_inv_cancel _ := mul_inv_cancel
zpow := zpowRec
nnqsmul := _
qsmul := _
section IsFractionRing
/-! ### `RatFunc` as field of fractions of `Polynomial` -/
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
instance (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] : Algebra R (RatFunc K) where
toFun x := RatFunc.mk (algebraMap _ _ x) 1
map_add' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_add, ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_mul, ofFractionRing_mul]
map_one' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_one, ofFractionRing_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_zero, ofFractionRing_zero]
smul := (· • ·)
smul_def' c x := by
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on' with p q hq
-- Porting note: the first `rw [...]` was not needed
rw [RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk]
rw [mk_one', ← mk_smul, mk_def_of_ne (c • p) hq, mk_def_of_ne p hq, ←
ofFractionRing_mul, IsLocalization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' c x := mul_comm _ _
variable {K}
/-- The coercion from polynomials to rational functions, implemented as the algebra map from a
domain to its field of fractions -/
@[coe]
def coePolynomial (P : Polynomial K) : RatFunc K := algebraMap _ _ P
instance : Coe (Polynomial K) (RatFunc K) := ⟨coePolynomial⟩
theorem mk_one (x : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk x 1 = algebraMap _ _ x :=
rfl
#align ratfunc.mk_one RatFunc.mk_one
theorem ofFractionRing_algebraMap (x : K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (algebraMap _ (FractionRing K[X]) x) = algebraMap _ _ x := by
rw [← mk_one, mk_one']
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_algebra_map RatFunc.ofFractionRing_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_div (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk p q = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
simp only [mk_eq_div', ofFractionRing_div, ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
#align ratfunc.mk_eq_div RatFunc.mk_eq_div
@[simp]
theorem div_smul {R} [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]] [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]] (c : R)
(p q : K[X]) :
algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) (c • p) / algebraMap _ _ q =
c • (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) := by
rw [← mk_eq_div, mk_smul, mk_eq_div]
#align ratfunc.div_smul RatFunc.div_smul
theorem algebraMap_apply {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] (x : R) :
algebraMap R (RatFunc K) x = algebraMap _ _ (algebraMap R K[X] x) / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by
rw [← mk_eq_div]
rfl
#align ratfunc.algebra_map_apply RatFunc.algebraMap_apply
theorem map_apply_div_ne_zero {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
have hq' : φ q ≠ 0 := nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr hq))
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk,
mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq']
#align ratfunc.map_apply_div_ne_zero RatFunc.map_apply_div_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_div {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· have : (0 : RatFunc K) = algebraMap K[X] _ 0 / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by simp
rw [map_zero, map_zero, map_zero, div_zero, div_zero, this, map_apply_div_ne_zero, map_one,
map_one, div_one, map_zero, map_zero]
exact one_ne_zero
exact map_apply_div_ne_zero _ _ _ _ hq
#align ratfunc.map_apply_div RatFunc.map_apply_div
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· simp only [div_zero, map_zero]
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
#align ratfunc.lift_monoid_with_zero_hom_apply_div RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div
@[simp]
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q := by
rw [← map_div₀, liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div _ hφ _ _ -- Porting note: gave explicitly the `hφ`
#align ratfunc.lift_ring_hom_apply_div RatFunc.liftRingHom_apply_div
@[simp]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' _ hφ _ _ -- Porting note: gave explicitly the `hφ`
variable (K)
theorem ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap :
ofFractionRing ∘ algebraMap K[X] (FractionRing K[X]) = algebraMap _ _ :=
funext ofFractionRing_algebraMap
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_comp_algebra_map RatFunc.ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap
theorem algebraMap_injective : Function.Injective (algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)) := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap]
exact ofFractionRing_injective.comp (IsFractionRing.injective _ _)
#align ratfunc.algebra_map_injective RatFunc.algebraMap_injective
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq_zero_iff {x : K[X]} : algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨(injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (algebraMap_injective K) _, fun hx => by
rw [hx, RingHom.map_zero]⟩
#align ratfunc.algebra_map_eq_zero_iff RatFunc.algebraMap_eq_zero_iff
variable {K}
theorem algebraMap_ne_zero {x : K[X]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) x ≠ 0 :=
mt (algebraMap_eq_zero_iff K).mp hx
#align ratfunc.algebra_map_ne_zero RatFunc.algebraMap_ne_zero
section LiftAlgHom
variable {L R S : Type*} [Field L] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]]
[Algebra S L] [Algebra S R[X]] (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
/-- Lift an algebra homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]`
to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] RatFunc R`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapAlgHom (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc K →ₐ[S] RatFunc R :=
{ mapRingHom φ hφ with
commutes' := fun r => by
simp_rw [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map, algebraMap_apply r, map_apply_div,
map_one, AlgHom.commutes] }
#align ratfunc.map_alg_hom RatFunc.mapAlgHom
theorem coe_mapAlgHom_eq_coe_map (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) :
(mapAlgHom φ hφ : RatFunc K → RatFunc R) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
#align ratfunc.coe_map_alg_hom_eq_coe_map RatFunc.coe_mapAlgHom_eq_coe_map
/-- Lift an injective algebra homomorphism `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftAlgHom : RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L :=
{ liftRingHom φ.toRingHom hφ with
commutes' := fun r => by
simp_rw [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, algebraMap_apply r,
liftRingHom_apply_div, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, map_one, div_one, AlgHom.commutes] }
#align ratfunc.lift_alg_hom RatFunc.liftAlgHom
theorem liftAlgHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (n : K[X]) (d : K[X]⁰) :
liftAlgHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ hφ _ _ -- Porting note: gave explicitly the `hφ`
#align ratfunc.lift_alg_hom_apply_of_fraction_ring_mk RatFunc.liftAlgHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk
theorem liftAlgHom_injective (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] L) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftAlgHom φ hφ') :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective _ hφ
#align ratfunc.lift_alg_hom_injective RatFunc.liftAlgHom_injective
@[simp]
theorem liftAlgHom_apply_div' (p q : K[X]) :
liftAlgHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftAlgHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' _ hφ _ _ -- Porting note: gave explicitly the `hφ`
theorem liftAlgHom_apply_div (p q : K[X]) :
liftAlgHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div _ hφ _ _ -- Porting note: gave explicitly the `hφ`
#align ratfunc.lift_alg_hom_apply_div RatFunc.liftAlgHom_apply_div
end LiftAlgHom
variable (K)
/-- `RatFunc K` is the field of fractions of the polynomials over `K`. -/
instance : IsFractionRing K[X] (RatFunc K) where
map_units' y := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
exact (toFractionRingRingEquiv K).symm.toRingHom.isUnit_map (IsLocalization.map_units _ y)
exists_of_eq {x y} := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_algebraMap, ← ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
exact fun h ↦ IsLocalization.exists_of_eq ((toFractionRingRingEquiv K).symm.injective h)
surj' := by
rintro ⟨z⟩
convert IsLocalization.surj K[X]⁰ z
-- Porting note: `ext ⟨x, y⟩` no longer necessary
simp only [← ofFractionRing_algebraMap, Function.comp_apply, ← ofFractionRing_mul]
rw [ofFractionRing.injEq] -- Porting note: added
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem liftOn_div {P : Sort v} (p q : K[X]) (f : K[X] → K[X] → P) (f0 : ∀ p, f p 0 = f 0 1)
(H' : ∀ {p q p' q'} (_hq : q ≠ 0) (_hq' : q' ≠ 0), q' * p = q * p' → f p q = f p' q')
(H : ∀ {p q p' q'} (_hq : q ∈ K[X]⁰) (_hq' : q' ∈ K[X]⁰), q' * p = q * p' → f p q = f p' q' :=
fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => H' (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hq) (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hq') h) :
(RatFunc.liftOn (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p / algebraMap _ _ q)) f @H = f p q := by
rw [← mk_eq_div, liftOn_mk _ _ f f0 @H']
#align ratfunc.lift_on_div RatFunc.liftOn_div
@[simp]
theorem liftOn'_div {P : Sort v} (p q : K[X]) (f : K[X] → K[X] → P) (f0 : ∀ p, f p 0 = f 0 1)
(H) :
(RatFunc.liftOn' (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p / algebraMap _ _ q)) f @H = f p q := by
rw [RatFunc.liftOn', liftOn_div _ _ _ f0]
apply liftOn_condition_of_liftOn'_condition H -- Porting note: `exact` did not work. Also,
-- was `@H` that still works, but is not needed.
#align ratfunc.lift_on'_div RatFunc.liftOn'_div
/-- Induction principle for `RatFunc K`: if `f p q : P (p / q)` for all `p q : K[X]`,
then `P` holds on all elements of `RatFunc K`.
See also `induction_on'`, which is a recursion principle defined in terms of `RatFunc.mk`.
-/
protected theorem induction_on {P : RatFunc K → Prop} (x : RatFunc K)
(f : ∀ (p q : K[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0), P (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p / algebraMap _ _ q)) : P x :=
x.induction_on' fun p q hq => by simpa using f p q hq
#align ratfunc.induction_on RatFunc.induction_on
theorem ofFractionRing_mk' (x : K[X]) (y : K[X]⁰) :
-- Porting note: I gave explicitly the argument `(FractionRing K[X])`
ofFractionRing (IsLocalization.mk' (FractionRing K[X]) x y) =
IsLocalization.mk' (RatFunc K) x y := by
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ← mk_eq_div', ← mk_eq_div]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_mk' RatFunc.ofFractionRing_mk'
@[simp]
theorem ofFractionRing_eq :
(ofFractionRing : FractionRing K[X] → RatFunc K) = IsLocalization.algEquiv K[X]⁰ _ _ :=
funext fun x =>
Localization.induction_on x fun x => by
simp only [IsLocalization.algEquiv_apply, IsLocalization.ringEquivOfRingEquiv_apply,
Localization.mk_eq_mk'_apply, IsLocalization.map_mk', ofFractionRing_mk',
RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, RingEquiv.refl_apply, SetLike.eta]
-- Porting note: added following `simp`. The previous one can be squeezed.
simp only [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, RingHom.id_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_eq RatFunc.ofFractionRing_eq
@[simp]
theorem toFractionRing_eq :
(toFractionRing : RatFunc K → FractionRing K[X]) = IsLocalization.algEquiv K[X]⁰ _ _ :=
funext fun ⟨x⟩ =>
Localization.induction_on x fun x => by
simp only [Localization.mk_eq_mk'_apply, ofFractionRing_mk', IsLocalization.algEquiv_apply,
IsLocalization.ringEquivOfRingEquiv_apply, IsLocalization.map_mk',
RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, RingEquiv.refl_apply, SetLike.eta]
-- Porting note: added following `simp`. The previous one can be squeezed.
simp only [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, RingHom.id_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
#align ratfunc.to_fraction_ring_eq RatFunc.toFractionRing_eq
@[simp]
theorem toFractionRingRingEquiv_symm_eq :
(toFractionRingRingEquiv K).symm = (IsLocalization.algEquiv K[X]⁰ _ _).toRingEquiv := by
ext x
simp [toFractionRingRingEquiv, ofFractionRing_eq, AlgEquiv.coe_ringEquiv']
#align ratfunc.to_fraction_ring_ring_equiv_symm_eq RatFunc.toFractionRingRingEquiv_symm_eq
end IsDomain
end IsFractionRing
end CommRing
section NumDenom
/-! ### Numerator and denominator -/
open GCDMonoid Polynomial
variable [Field K]
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
/-- `RatFunc.numDenom` are numerator and denominator of a rational function over a field,
normalized such that the denominator is monic. -/
def numDenom (x : RatFunc K) : K[X] × K[X] :=
x.liftOn'
(fun p q =>
if q = 0 then ⟨0, 1⟩
else
let r := gcd p q
⟨Polynomial.C (q / r).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / r),
Polynomial.C (q / r).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (q / r)⟩)
(by
intros p q a hq ha
dsimp
rw [if_neg hq, if_neg (mul_ne_zero ha hq)]
have ha' : a.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := Polynomial.leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr ha
have hainv : a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ ≠ 0 := inv_ne_zero ha'
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, gcd_mul_left, normalize_apply, Polynomial.coe_normUnit, mul_assoc,
CommGroupWithZero.coe_normUnit _ ha']
have hdeg : (gcd p q).degree ≤ q.degree := degree_gcd_le_right _ hq
have hdeg' : (Polynomial.C a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ * gcd p q).degree ≤ q.degree := by
rw [Polynomial.degree_mul, Polynomial.degree_C hainv, zero_add]
exact hdeg
have hdivp : Polynomial.C a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ * gcd p q ∣ p :=
(C_mul_dvd hainv).mpr (gcd_dvd_left p q)
have hdivq : Polynomial.C a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ * gcd p q ∣ q :=
(C_mul_dvd hainv).mpr (gcd_dvd_right p q)
-- Porting note: added `simp only [...]` and `rw [mul_assoc]`
-- Porting note: note the unfolding of `normalize` and `normUnit`!
simp only [normalize, normUnit, coe_normUnit, leadingCoeff_eq_zero, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk,
ZeroHom.coe_mk, ha, dite_false, Units.val_inv_eq_inv_val, Units.val_mk0]
rw [mul_assoc]
rw [EuclideanDomain.mul_div_mul_cancel ha hdivp, EuclideanDomain.mul_div_mul_cancel ha hdivq,
leadingCoeff_div hdeg, leadingCoeff_div hdeg', Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul,
Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C, div_C_mul, div_C_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Polynomial.C_mul, ←
mul_assoc, ← Polynomial.C_mul]
constructor <;> congr <;>
rw [inv_div, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, ← mul_assoc, inv_inv, _root_.mul_inv_cancel ha',
one_mul, inv_div])
#align ratfunc.num_denom RatFunc.numDenom
@[simp]
theorem numDenom_div (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
numDenom (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
(Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q),
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (q / gcd p q)) := by
rw [numDenom, liftOn'_div, if_neg hq]
intro p
rw [if_pos rfl, if_neg (one_ne_zero' K[X])]
simp
#align ratfunc.num_denom_div RatFunc.numDenom_div
/-- `RatFunc.num` is the numerator of a rational function,
normalized such that the denominator is monic. -/
def num (x : RatFunc K) : K[X] :=
x.numDenom.1
#align ratfunc.num RatFunc.num
private theorem num_div' (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
num (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q) := by
rw [num, numDenom_div _ hq]
@[simp]
theorem num_zero : num (0 : RatFunc K) = 0 := by convert num_div' (0 : K[X]) one_ne_zero <;> simp
#align ratfunc.num_zero RatFunc.num_zero
@[simp]
theorem num_div (p q : K[X]) :
num (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q) := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· exact num_div' p hq
#align ratfunc.num_div RatFunc.num_div
@[simp]
theorem num_one : num (1 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by convert num_div (1 : K[X]) 1 <;> simp
#align ratfunc.num_one RatFunc.num_one
@[simp]
theorem num_algebraMap (p : K[X]) : num (algebraMap _ _ p) = p := by convert num_div p 1 <;> simp
#align ratfunc.num_algebra_map RatFunc.num_algebraMap
theorem num_div_dvd (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
num (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) ∣ p := by
rw [num_div _ q, C_mul_dvd]
· exact EuclideanDomain.div_dvd_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left p q)
· simpa only [Ne, inv_eq_zero, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] using right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq
#align ratfunc.num_div_dvd RatFunc.num_div_dvd
/-- A version of `num_div_dvd` with the LHS in simp normal form -/
@[simp]
theorem num_div_dvd' (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q) ∣ p := by simpa using num_div_dvd p hq
#align ratfunc.num_div_dvd' RatFunc.num_div_dvd'
/-- `RatFunc.denom` is the denominator of a rational function,
normalized such that it is monic. -/
def denom (x : RatFunc K) : K[X] :=
x.numDenom.2
#align ratfunc.denom RatFunc.denom
@[simp]
theorem denom_div (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
denom (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (q / gcd p q) := by
rw [denom, numDenom_div _ hq]
#align ratfunc.denom_div RatFunc.denom_div
theorem monic_denom (x : RatFunc K) : (denom x).Monic := by
induction x using RatFunc.induction_on with
| f p q hq =>
rw [denom_div p hq, mul_comm]
exact Polynomial.monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv (right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq)
#align ratfunc.monic_denom RatFunc.monic_denom
theorem denom_ne_zero (x : RatFunc K) : denom x ≠ 0 :=
(monic_denom x).ne_zero
#align ratfunc.denom_ne_zero RatFunc.denom_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem denom_zero : denom (0 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by
convert denom_div (0 : K[X]) one_ne_zero <;> simp
#align ratfunc.denom_zero RatFunc.denom_zero
@[simp]
theorem denom_one : denom (1 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by
convert denom_div (1 : K[X]) one_ne_zero <;> simp
#align ratfunc.denom_one RatFunc.denom_one
@[simp]
theorem denom_algebraMap (p : K[X]) : denom (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p) = 1 := by
convert denom_div p one_ne_zero <;> simp
#align ratfunc.denom_algebra_map RatFunc.denom_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem denom_div_dvd (p q : K[X]) : denom (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) ∣ q := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
rw [denom_div _ hq, C_mul_dvd]
· exact EuclideanDomain.div_dvd_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_right p q)
· simpa only [Ne, inv_eq_zero, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] using right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq
#align ratfunc.denom_div_dvd RatFunc.denom_div_dvd
@[simp]
theorem num_div_denom (x : RatFunc K) : algebraMap _ _ (num x) / algebraMap _ _ (denom x) = x := by
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on with p q hq
-- Porting note: had to hint the type of this `have`
have q_div_ne_zero : q / gcd p q ≠ 0 := right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq
rw [num_div p q, denom_div p hq, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_div_mul_left,
div_eq_div_iff, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_mul, mul_comm _ q, ←
EuclideanDomain.mul_div_assoc, ← EuclideanDomain.mul_div_assoc, mul_comm]
· apply gcd_dvd_right
· apply gcd_dvd_left
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero q_div_ne_zero
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero hq
· refine algebraMap_ne_zero (mt Polynomial.C_eq_zero.mp ?_)
exact inv_ne_zero (Polynomial.leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr q_div_ne_zero)
#align ratfunc.num_div_denom RatFunc.num_div_denom
theorem isCoprime_num_denom (x : RatFunc K) : IsCoprime x.num x.denom := by
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on with p q hq
rw [num_div, denom_div _ hq]
exact (isCoprime_mul_unit_left
((leadingCoeff_ne_zero.2 <| right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq).isUnit.inv.map C) _ _).2
(isCoprime_div_gcd_div_gcd hq)
#align ratfunc.is_coprime_num_denom RatFunc.isCoprime_num_denom
@[simp]
theorem num_eq_zero_iff {x : RatFunc K} : num x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← num_div_denom x, h, RingHom.map_zero, zero_div], fun h => h.symm ▸ num_zero⟩
#align ratfunc.num_eq_zero_iff RatFunc.num_eq_zero_iff
theorem num_ne_zero {x : RatFunc K} (hx : x ≠ 0) : num x ≠ 0 :=
mt num_eq_zero_iff.mp hx
#align ratfunc.num_ne_zero RatFunc.num_ne_zero
theorem num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff {x : RatFunc K} {p q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
x.num * q = p * x.denom ↔ x = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
rw [← (algebraMap_injective K).eq_iff, eq_div_iff (algebraMap_ne_zero hq)]
conv_rhs => rw [← num_div_denom x]
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, mul_comm (Inv.inv _), ←
mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_iff]
exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x)
#align ratfunc.num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff RatFunc.num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff
theorem num_denom_add (x y : RatFunc K) :
(x + y).num * (x.denom * y.denom) = (x.num * y.denom + x.denom * y.num) * (x + y).denom :=
(num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))).mpr <| by
conv_lhs => rw [← num_div_denom x, ← num_div_denom y]
rw [div_add_div, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul]
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x)
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero y)
#align ratfunc.num_denom_add RatFunc.num_denom_add
theorem num_denom_neg (x : RatFunc K) : (-x).num * x.denom = -x.num * (-x).denom := by
rw [num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff (denom_ne_zero x), _root_.map_neg, neg_div, num_div_denom]
#align ratfunc.num_denom_neg RatFunc.num_denom_neg
theorem num_denom_mul (x y : RatFunc K) :
(x * y).num * (x.denom * y.denom) = x.num * y.num * (x * y).denom :=
(num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))).mpr <| by
conv_lhs =>
rw [← num_div_denom x, ← num_div_denom y, div_mul_div_comm, ← RingHom.map_mul, ←
RingHom.map_mul]
#align ratfunc.num_denom_mul RatFunc.num_denom_mul
theorem num_dvd {x : RatFunc K} {p : K[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
num x ∣ p ↔ ∃ q : K[X], q ≠ 0 ∧ x = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨q, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨_hx, hq⟩ := mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hp
use denom x * q
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, div_self, mul_one, num_div_denom]
· exact ⟨mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) hq, rfl⟩
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero hq
· rintro ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩
exact num_div_dvd p hq
#align ratfunc.num_dvd RatFunc.num_dvd
theorem denom_dvd {x : RatFunc K} {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
denom x ∣ q ↔ ∃ p : K[X], x = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨_hx, hp⟩ := mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hq
use num x * p
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, div_self, mul_one, num_div_denom]
exact algebraMap_ne_zero hp
· rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩
exact denom_div_dvd p q
#align ratfunc.denom_dvd RatFunc.denom_dvd
theorem num_mul_dvd (x y : RatFunc K) : num (x * y) ∣ num x * num y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
rw [num_dvd (mul_ne_zero (num_ne_zero hx) (num_ne_zero hy))]
refine ⟨x.denom * y.denom, mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y), ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, num_div_denom, num_div_denom]
#align ratfunc.num_mul_dvd RatFunc.num_mul_dvd
theorem denom_mul_dvd (x y : RatFunc K) : denom (x * y) ∣ denom x * denom y := by
rw [denom_dvd (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))]
refine ⟨x.num * y.num, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, num_div_denom, num_div_denom]
#align ratfunc.denom_mul_dvd RatFunc.denom_mul_dvd
theorem denom_add_dvd (x y : RatFunc K) : denom (x + y) ∣ denom x * denom y := by
rw [denom_dvd (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))]
refine ⟨x.num * y.denom + x.denom * y.num, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_add_div,
num_div_denom, num_div_denom]
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x)
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero y)
#align ratfunc.denom_add_dvd RatFunc.denom_add_dvd
theorem map_denom_ne_zero {L F : Type*} [Zero L] [FunLike F K[X] L] [ZeroHomClass F K[X] L]
(φ : F) (hφ : Function.Injective φ) (f : RatFunc K) : φ f.denom ≠ 0 := fun H =>
(denom_ne_zero f) ((map_eq_zero_iff φ hφ).mp H)
#align ratfunc.map_denom_ne_zero RatFunc.map_denom_ne_zero
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Basic.lean | 1,115 | 1,120 | theorem map_apply {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidHomClass F K[X] R[X]] (φ : F)
(hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (f : RatFunc K) :
map φ hφ f = algebraMap _ _ (φ f.num) / algebraMap _ _ (φ f.denom) := by |
rw [← num_div_denom f, map_apply_div_ne_zero, num_div_denom f]
exact denom_ne_zero _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.MulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
#align_import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Asymptotics
We introduce these relations:
* `IsBigOWith c l f g` : "f is big O of g along l with constant c";
* `f =O[l] g` : "f is big O of g along l";
* `f =o[l] g` : "f is little o of g along l".
Here `l` is any filter on the domain of `f` and `g`, which are assumed to be the same. The codomains
of `f` and `g` do not need to be the same; all that is needed that there is a norm associated with
these types, and it is the norm that is compared asymptotically.
The relation `IsBigOWith c` is introduced to factor out common algebraic arguments in the proofs of
similar properties of `IsBigO` and `IsLittleO`. Usually proofs outside of this file should use
`IsBigO` instead.
Often the ranges of `f` and `g` will be the real numbers, in which case the norm is the absolute
value. In general, we have
`f =O[l] g ↔ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖) =O[l] (fun x ↦ ‖g x‖)`,
and similarly for `IsLittleO`. But our setup allows us to use the notions e.g. with functions
to the integers, rationals, complex numbers, or any normed vector space without mentioning the
norm explicitly.
If `f` and `g` are functions to a normed field like the reals or complex numbers and `g` is always
nonzero, we have
`f =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / (g x)) l (𝓝 0)`.
In fact, the right-to-left direction holds without the hypothesis on `g`, and in the other direction
it suffices to assume that `f` is zero wherever `g` is. (This generalization is useful in defining
the Fréchet derivative.)
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter NNReal
namespace Asymptotics
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {E : Type*} {F : Type*} {G : Type*} {E' : Type*}
{F' : Type*} {G' : Type*} {E'' : Type*} {F'' : Type*} {G'' : Type*} {E''' : Type*}
{R : Type*} {R' : Type*} {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*}
variable [Norm E] [Norm F] [Norm G]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedAddCommGroup G''] [SeminormedRing R]
[SeminormedAddGroup E''']
[SeminormedRing R']
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜']
variable {c c' c₁ c₂ : ℝ} {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G}
variable {f' : α → E'} {g' : α → F'} {k' : α → G'}
variable {f'' : α → E''} {g'' : α → F''} {k'' : α → G''}
variable {l l' : Filter α}
section Defs
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- This version of the Landau notation `IsBigOWith C l f g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on
a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by `C * ‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded by `C`, modulo division by zero issues that are
avoided by this definition. Probably you want to use `IsBigO` instead of this relation. -/
irreducible_def IsBigOWith (c : ℝ) (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
#align asymptotics.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigOWith` is irreducible. -/
theorem isBigOWith_iff : IsBigOWith c l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by rw [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_iff Asymptotics.isBigOWith_iff
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.bound, IsBigOWith.of_bound⟩ := isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =O[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by a constant multiple of `‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided
by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsBigO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =O[" l "] " g:100 => IsBigO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigO` is
irreducible. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g := by rw [IsBigO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isBigO_iff : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_iff
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with a positive constant. -/
theorem isBigO_iff' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff] at h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
refine ⟨max c 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _), ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
apply hx.trans
gcongr
exact le_max_left _ _
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
obtain ⟨c, ⟨_, hc⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with the constant in the lower bound. -/
theorem isBigO_iff'' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff'] at h
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)]
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff']
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [← inv_inv c, inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)] at hx
theorem IsBigO.of_bound (c : ℝ) (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff.2 ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound
theorem IsBigO.of_bound' (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound 1 <| by
simp_rw [one_mul]
exact h
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound' Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound'
theorem IsBigO.bound : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigO_iff.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =o[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by an arbitrarily small constant
multiple of `‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` tends to `0` along `l`, modulo division by zero
issues that are avoided by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsLittleO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_o Asymptotics.IsLittleO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =o[" l "] " g:100 => IsLittleO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g := by
rw [IsLittleO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
alias ⟨IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith, IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith⟩ := isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff
alias ⟨IsLittleO.bound, IsLittleO.of_bound⟩ := isLittleO_iff
#align asymptotics.is_o.bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.bound
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_bound
theorem IsLittleO.def (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def
theorem IsLittleO.def' (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigOWith_iff.2 <| isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def'
theorem IsLittleO.eventuallyLE (h : f =o[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simpa using h.def zero_lt_one
end Defs
/-! ### Conversions -/
theorem IsBigOWith.isBigO (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) : f =O[l] g := by rw [IsBigO_def]; exact ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.isBigOWith (hgf : f =o[l] g) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
hgf.def' zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigOWith
theorem IsLittleO.isBigO (hgf : f =o[l] g) : f =O[l] g :=
hgf.isBigOWith.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigO
theorem IsBigO.isBigOWith : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigO.isBigOWith
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/Asymptotics.lean | 225 | 230 | theorem IsBigOWith.weaken (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : c ≤ c') : IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_of_superset h.bound fun x hx =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ := hx
_ ≤ _ := by | gcongr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import order.filter.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `Filter` : filters on a set;
* `Filter.principal` : filter of all sets containing a given set;
* `Filter.map`, `Filter.comap` : operations on filters;
* `Filter.Tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `Filter.Eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `Filter.Frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` :
a tactic that takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`,
and replaces a goal `s ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `Filter.NeBot f` : a utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `Filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `Filter.Tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on Topology.Basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from Topology.Basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Order
open scoped Classical
universe u v w x y
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure Filter (α : Type*) where
/-- The set of sets that belong to the filter. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set `Set.univ` belongs to any filter. -/
univ_sets : Set.univ ∈ sets
/-- If a set belongs to a filter, then its superset belongs to the filter as well. -/
sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets
/-- If two sets belong to a filter, then their intersection belongs to the filter as well. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets
#align filter Filter
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (Filter α) :=
⟨fun U F => U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_mk {t : Set (Set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_mk Filter.mem_mk
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sets Filter.mem_sets
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
#align filter.inhabited_mem Filter.inhabitedMem
theorem filter_eq : ∀ {f g : Filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align filter.filter_eq Filter.filter_eq
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
#align filter.filter_eq_iff Filter.filter_eq_iff
protected theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g := by
simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, Filter.mem_sets]
#align filter.ext_iff Filter.ext_iff
@[ext]
protected theorem ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
Filter.ext_iff.2
#align filter.ext Filter.ext
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
#align filter.coext Filter.coext
@[simp]
theorem univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
#align filter.univ_mem Filter.univ_mem
theorem mem_of_superset {x y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ f) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset hx hxy
#align filter.mem_of_superset Filter.mem_of_superset
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
theorem inter_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets hs ht
#align filter.inter_mem Filter.inter_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_iff Filter.inter_mem_iff
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.diff_mem Filter.diff_mem
theorem univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => h x
#align filter.univ_mem' Filter.univ_mem'
theorem mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : { x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t } ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ h₁
#align filter.mp_mem Filter.mp_mem
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
#align filter.congr_sets Filter.congr_sets
/-- Override `sets` field of a filter to provide better definitional equality. -/
protected def copy (f : Filter α) (S : Set (Set α)) (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : Filter α where
sets := S
univ_sets := (hmem _).2 univ_mem
sets_of_superset h hsub := (hmem _).2 <| mem_of_superset ((hmem _).1 h) hsub
inter_sets h₁ h₂ := (hmem _).2 <| inter_mem ((hmem _).1 h₁) ((hmem _).1 h₂)
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
@[simp] lemma mem_copy {S hmem} : s ∈ f.copy S hmem ↔ s ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem biInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Finite) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
Finite.induction_on hf (by simp) fun _ _ hs => by simp [hs]
#align filter.bInter_mem Filter.biInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem biInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} (is : Finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
biInter_mem is.finite_toSet
#align filter.bInter_finset_mem Filter.biInter_finset_mem
alias _root_.Finset.iInter_mem_sets := biInter_finset_mem
#align finset.Inter_mem_sets Finset.iInter_mem_sets
-- attribute [protected] Finset.iInter_mem_sets porting note: doesn't work
@[simp]
theorem sInter_mem {s : Set (Set α)} (hfin : s.Finite) : ⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem hfin]
#align filter.sInter_mem Filter.sInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem iInter_mem {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Finite β] : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
(sInter_mem (finite_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align filter.Inter_mem Filter.iInter_mem
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_subset_iff Filter.exists_mem_subset_iff
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
#align filter.monotone_mem Filter.monotone_mem
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_and_iff Filter.exists_mem_and_iff
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
#align filter.forall_in_swap Filter.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
/--
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f` and terms
`h₁ : t₁ ∈ f, ⋯, hₙ : tₙ ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t₁ → ⋯ → x ∈ tₙ → x ∈ s`.
The list is an optional parameter, `[]` being its default value.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ], intros a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ }`.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] using e` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
Combining both shortcuts is done by writing `filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ using e`.
Note that in this case, the `aᵢ` terms can be used in `e`.
-/
syntax (name := filterUpwards) "filter_upwards" (" [" term,* "]")?
(" with" (ppSpace colGt term:max)*)? (" using " term)? : tactic
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| filter_upwards $[[$[$args],*]]? $[with $wth*]? $[using $usingArg]?) => do
let config : ApplyConfig := {newGoals := ApplyNewGoals.nonDependentOnly}
for e in args.getD #[] |>.reverse do
let goal ← getMainGoal
replaceMainGoal <| ← goal.withContext <| runTermElab do
let m ← mkFreshExprMVar none
let lem ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType
(← ``(Filter.mp_mem $e $(← Term.exprToSyntax m))) (← goal.getType)
goal.assign lem
return [m.mvarId!]
liftMetaTactic fun goal => do
goal.apply (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``Filter.univ_mem') config
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| dsimp (config := {zeta := false}) only [Set.mem_setOf_eq])
if let some l := wth then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| intro $[$l]*)
if let some e := usingArg then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| exact $e)
end Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
section Principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : Set α) : Filter α where
sets := { t | s ⊆ t }
univ_sets := subset_univ s
sets_of_superset hx := Subset.trans hx
inter_sets := subset_inter
#align filter.principal Filter.principal
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "𝓟" => Filter.principal
@[simp] theorem mem_principal {s t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal Filter.mem_principal
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal_self Filter.mem_principal_self
end Principal
open Filter
section Join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : Filter (Filter α)) : Filter α where
sets := { s | { t : Filter α | s ∈ t } ∈ f }
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, univ_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, setOf_true]
sets_of_superset hx xy := mem_of_superset hx fun f h => mem_of_superset h xy
inter_sets hx hy := mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) fun f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => inter_mem h₁ h₂
#align filter.join Filter.join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {s : Set α} {f : Filter (Filter α)} : s ∈ join f ↔ { t | s ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_join Filter.mem_join
end Join
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance : PartialOrder (Filter α) where
le f g := ∀ ⦃U : Set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := filter_eq <| Subset.antisymm h₂ h₁
le_refl a := Subset.rfl
le_trans a b c h₁ h₂ := Subset.trans h₂ h₁
theorem le_def : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.le_def Filter.le_def
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align filter.not_le Filter.not_le
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
#align filter.generate_sets Filter.GenerateSets
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
#align filter.generate Filter.generate
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
#align filter.sets_iff_generate Filter.le_generate_iff
theorem mem_generate_iff {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction h with
| @basic V V_in =>
exact ⟨{V}, singleton_subset_iff.2 V_in, finite_singleton _, (sInter_singleton _).subset⟩
| univ => exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, finite_empty, subset_univ _⟩
| superset _ hVW hV =>
rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, ht, htV.trans hVW⟩
| inter _ _ hV hW =>
rcases hV, hW with ⟨⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩, u, hus, hu, huW⟩
exact
⟨t ∪ u, union_subset hts hus, ht.union hu,
(sInter_union _ _).subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter htV huW⟩
· rcases h with ⟨t, hts, tfin, h⟩
exact mem_of_superset ((sInter_mem tfin).2 fun V hV => GenerateSets.basic <| hts hV) h
#align filter.mem_generate_iff Filter.mem_generate_iff
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
#align filter.mk_of_closure Filter.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.mk_of_closure_sets Filter.mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align filter.gi_generate Filter.giGenerate
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : Inf (Filter α) :=
⟨fun f g : Filter α =>
{ sets := { s | ∃ a ∈ f, ∃ b ∈ g, s = a ∩ b }
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy
refine
⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha subset_union_left, b ∪ y,
mem_of_superset hb subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
inter_sets := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, ?_⟩
ac_rfl }⟩
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inf_iff Filter.mem_inf_iff
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_left Filter.mem_inf_of_left
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_right Filter.mem_inf_of_right
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_inf Filter.inter_mem_inf
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
#align filter.mem_inf_of_inter Filter.mem_inf_of_inter
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_iff_superset Filter.mem_inf_iff_superset
instance : Top (Filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := { s | ∀ x, x ∈ s }
univ_sets := fun x => mem_univ x
sets_of_superset := fun hx hxy a => hxy (hx a)
inter_sets := fun hx hy _ => mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
theorem mem_top_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_top_iff_forall Filter.mem_top_iff_forall
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ s = univ := by
rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.mem_top Filter.mem_top
section CompleteLattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for some lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) :=
{ @OrderDual.instCompleteLattice _ (giGenerate α).liftCompleteLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _s hs => (mem_top.1 hs).symm ▸ univ_mem
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
sSup := join ∘ 𝓟
le_sSup := fun _ _f hf _s hs => hs hf
sSup_le := fun _ _f hf _s hs _g hg => hf _ hg hs }
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
/-- A filter is `NeBot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set does not belong to
the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition of a filter but we prefer to have a
`CompleteLattice` structure on `Filter _`, so we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class NeBot (f : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- The filter is nontrivial: `f ≠ ⊥` or equivalently, `∅ ∉ f`. -/
ne' : f ≠ ⊥
#align filter.ne_bot Filter.NeBot
theorem neBot_iff {f : Filter α} : NeBot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.ne_bot_iff Filter.neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
#align filter.ne_bot.ne Filter.NeBot.ne
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
#align filter.not_ne_bot Filter.not_neBot
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.mono Filter.NeBot.mono
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
#align filter.ne_bot_of_le Filter.neBot_of_le
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.sup_ne_bot Filter.sup_neBot
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
#align filter.not_disjoint_self_iff Filter.not_disjoint_self_iff
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
#align filter.bot_sets_eq Filter.bot_sets_eq
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
#align filter.sup_sets_eq Filter.sup_sets_eq
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
#align filter.Sup_sets_eq Filter.sSup_sets_eq
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
#align filter.supr_sets_eq Filter.iSup_sets_eq
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
#align filter.generate_empty Filter.generate_empty
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
#align filter.generate_univ Filter.generate_univ
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
#align filter.generate_union Filter.generate_union
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
#align filter.generate_Union Filter.generate_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : Filter α) :=
trivial
#align filter.mem_bot Filter.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sup Filter.mem_sup
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
#align filter.union_mem_sup Filter.union_mem_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {x : Set α} {s : Set (Filter α)} : x ∈ sSup s ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : Filter α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_Sup Filter.mem_sSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter]
#align filter.mem_supr Filter.mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
#align filter.supr_ne_bot Filter.iSup_neBot
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
show generate _ = generate _ from congr_arg _ <| congr_arg sSup <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align filter.infi_eq_generate Filter.iInf_eq_generate
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
#align filter.mem_infi_of_mem Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem
theorem mem_iInf_of_iInter {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} {I : Set ι} (I_fin : I.Finite)
{V : I → Set α} (hV : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i) (hU : ⋂ i, V i ⊆ U) : U ∈ ⨅ i, s i := by
haveI := I_fin.fintype
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 fun i => ?_) hU
exact mem_iInf_of_mem (i : ι) (hV _)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_Inter Filter.mem_iInf_of_iInter
theorem mem_iInf {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : I → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
constructor
· rw [iInf_eq_generate, mem_generate_iff]
rintro ⟨t, tsub, tfin, tinter⟩
rcases eq_finite_iUnion_of_finite_subset_iUnion tfin tsub with ⟨I, Ifin, σ, σfin, σsub, rfl⟩
rw [sInter_iUnion] at tinter
set V := fun i => U ∪ ⋂₀ σ i with hV
have V_in : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i := by
rintro i
have : ⋂₀ σ i ∈ s i := by
rw [sInter_mem (σfin _)]
apply σsub
exact mem_of_superset this subset_union_right
refine ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, ?_⟩
rwa [hV, ← union_iInter, union_eq_self_of_subset_right]
· rintro ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInf_of_iInter Ifin V_in Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_infi Filter.mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf' {ι} {s : ι → Filter α} {U : Set α} :
(U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ V : ι → Set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧
(∀ i ∉ I, V i = univ) ∧ (U = ⋂ i ∈ I, V i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i := by
simp only [mem_iInf, SetCoe.forall', biInter_eq_iInter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨I, If, V, hVs, _, hVU, _⟩ => ⟨I, If, fun i => V i, fun i => hVs i, hVU⟩⟩
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hV, rfl⟩
refine ⟨I, If, fun i => if hi : i ∈ I then V ⟨i, hi⟩ else univ, fun i => ?_, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [hV _, univ_mem]
· exact dif_neg hi
· simp only [iInter_dite, biInter_eq_iInter, dif_pos (Subtype.coe_prop _), Subtype.coe_eta,
iInter_univ, inter_univ, eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
#align filter.mem_infi' Filter.mem_iInf'
theorem exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} {s}
(hs : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) : ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
let ⟨_, _, V, hVs, _, _, hVU'⟩ := mem_iInf'.1 hs; ⟨V, hVs, hVU'⟩
#align filter.exists_Inter_of_mem_infi Filter.exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf
theorem mem_iInf_of_finite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {α : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
(s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ t : ι → Set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i := by
refine ⟨exists_iInter_of_mem_iInf, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun i => mem_iInf_of_mem i (ht i)
#align filter.mem_infi_of_finite Filter.mem_iInf_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
#align filter.le_principal_iff Filter.le_principal_iff
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
#align filter.Iic_principal Filter.Iic_principal
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, iff_self_iff, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_mono Filter.principal_mono
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
#align filter.monotone_principal Filter.monotone_principal
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
#align filter.principal_eq_iff_eq Filter.principal_eq_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
#align filter.join_principal_eq_Sup Filter.join_principal_eq_sSup
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.principal_univ Filter.principal_univ
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
#align filter.principal_empty Filter.principal_empty
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
#align filter.generate_eq_binfi Filter.generate_eq_biInf
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
#align filter.empty_mem_iff_bot Filter.empty_mem_iff_bot
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
#align filter.nonempty_of_mem Filter.nonempty_of_mem
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
#align filter.ne_bot.nonempty_of_mem Filter.NeBot.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
#align filter.empty_not_mem Filter.empty_not_mem
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
#align filter.nonempty_of_ne_bot Filter.nonempty_of_neBot
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
#align filter.compl_not_mem Filter.compl_not_mem
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
#align filter.filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty Filter.filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
#align filter.disjoint_iff Filter.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem Filter.disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.not_disjoint Filter.NeBot.not_disjoint
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
#align filter.inf_eq_bot_iff Filter.inf_eq_bot_iff
theorem _root_.Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {l : ι → Filter α}
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on l)) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on s) := by
have : Pairwise fun i j => ∃ (s : {s // s ∈ l i}) (t : {t // t ∈ l j}), Disjoint s.1 t.1 := by
simpa only [Pairwise, Function.onFun, Filter.disjoint_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists] using hd
choose! s t hst using this
refine ⟨fun i => ⋂ j, @s i j ∩ @t j i, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exacts [iInter_mem.2 fun j => inter_mem (@s i j).2 (@t j i).2,
(hst hij).mono ((iInter_subset _ j).trans inter_subset_left)
((iInter_subset _ i).trans inter_subset_right)]
#align pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint Pairwise.exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter {ι : Type*} {l : ι → Filter α} {t : Set ι}
(hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint l) (ht : t.Finite) :
∃ s : ι → Set α, (∀ i, s i ∈ l i) ∧ t.PairwiseDisjoint s := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rcases (hd.subtype _ _).exists_mem_filter_of_disjoint with ⟨s, hsl, hsd⟩
lift s to (i : t) → {s // s ∈ l i} using hsl
rcases @Subtype.exists_pi_extension ι (fun i => { s // s ∈ l i }) _ _ s with ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun i => s i, fun i => (s i).2, hsd.set_of_subtype _ _⟩
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.exists_mem_filter Set.PairwiseDisjoint.exists_mem_filter
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
#align filter.unique Filter.unique
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
#align filter.eq_top_of_ne_bot Filter.eq_top_of_neBot
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
#align filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot Filter.forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, NeBot.ne <| forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1
fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
#align filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty Filter.nontrivial_iff_nonempty
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
#align filter.eq_Inf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans exists_range_iff.symm
#align filter.eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
#align filter.eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem Filter.eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_memₓ
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
-- Porting note: it was just `congr_arg filter.sets this.symm`
(congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm).trans <| by simp only
#align filter.infi_sets_eq Filter.iInf_sets_eq
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
#align filter.mem_infi_of_directed Filter.mem_iInf_of_directed
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
#align filter.mem_binfi_of_directed Filter.mem_biInf_of_directed
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
#align filter.binfi_sets_eq Filter.biInf_sets_eq
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset ι, (⨅ i ∈ t, f i).sets := by
rw [iInf_eq_iInf_finset, iInf_sets_eq]
exact directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ => biInf_mono
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite
theorem iInf_sets_eq_finite' (f : ι → Filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = ⋃ t : Finset (PLift ι), (⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i)).sets := by
rw [← iInf_sets_eq_finite, ← Equiv.plift.surjective.iInf_comp, Equiv.plift_apply]
#align filter.infi_sets_eq_finite' Filter.iInf_sets_eq_finite'
theorem mem_iInf_finite {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset ι, s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f i :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite Filter.mem_iInf_finite
theorem mem_iInf_finite' {f : ι → Filter α} (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ t : Finset (PLift ι), s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f (PLift.down i) :=
(Set.ext_iff.1 (iInf_sets_eq_finite' f) s).trans mem_iUnion
#align filter.mem_infi_finite' Filter.mem_iInf_finite'
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
#align filter.sup_join Filter.sup_join
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
#align filter.supr_join Filter.iSup_join
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
-- The dual version does not hold! `Filter α` is not a `CompleteDistribLattice`. -/
instance : Coframe (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := fun f s t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [iInf_subtype']
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_sets_eq_finite, mem_iUnion] at h₂
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₂
rw [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hu
suffices ⨅ i : s, f ⊔ ↑i ≤ f ⊔ u.inf fun i => ↑i from this ⟨h₁, hu⟩
refine Finset.induction_on u (le_sup_of_le_right le_top) ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ u _ ih
rw [Finset.inf_insert, sup_inf_left]
exact le_inf (iInf_le _ _) ih }
theorem mem_iInf_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Filter β} {t : Set β} :
(t ∈ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) ↔ ∃ p : α → Set β, (∀ a ∈ s, p a ∈ f a) ∧ t = ⋂ a ∈ s, p a := by
simp only [← Finset.set_biInter_coe, biInter_eq_iInter, iInf_subtype']
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases (mem_iInf_of_finite _).1 h with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun a => if h : a ∈ s then p ⟨a, h⟩ else univ,
fun a ha => by simpa [ha] using hp ⟨a, ha⟩, ?_⟩
refine iInter_congr_of_surjective id surjective_id ?_
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
simp [ha]
· rintro ⟨p, hpf, rfl⟩
exact iInter_mem.2 fun a => mem_iInf_of_mem a (hpf a a.2)
#align filter.mem_infi_finset Filter.mem_iInf_finset
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed'
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed' Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed'
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
#align filter.Inf_ne_bot_of_directed Filter.sInf_neBot_of_directed
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed' Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed'
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
#align filter.infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed Filter.iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iInf_sets_induct {f : ι → Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ iInf f) {p : Set α → Prop}
(uni : p univ) (ins : ∀ {i s₁ s₂}, s₁ ∈ f i → p s₂ → p (s₁ ∩ s₂)) : p s := by
rw [mem_iInf_finite'] at hs
simp only [← Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨is, his⟩
induction is using Finset.induction_on generalizing s with
| empty => rwa [mem_top.1 his]
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_iff] at his
rcases his with ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩
exact ins hs₁ (ih hs₂)
#align filter.infi_sets_induct Filter.iInf_sets_induct
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
#align filter.inf_principal Filter.inf_principal
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
#align filter.sup_principal Filter.sup_principal
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
#align filter.supr_principal Filter.iSup_principal
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
#align filter.principal_eq_bot_iff Filter.principal_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align filter.principal_ne_bot_iff Filter.principal_neBot_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
#align set.nonempty.principal_ne_bot Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
#align filter.is_compl_principal Filter.isCompl_principal
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal' Filter.mem_inf_principal'
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
#align filter.mem_inf_principal Filter.mem_inf_principal
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
#align filter.supr_inf_principal Filter.iSup_inf_principal
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
#align filter.inf_principal_eq_bot Filter.inf_principal_eq_bot
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
#align filter.mem_of_eq_bot Filter.mem_of_eq_bot
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
#align filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl Filter.diff_mem_inf_principal_compl
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
#align filter.principal_le_iff Filter.principal_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal_finset {ι : Type w} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs
· simp
· rw [Finset.iInf_insert, Finset.set_biInter_insert, hs, inf_principal]
#align filter.infi_principal_finset Filter.iInf_principal_finset
theorem iInf_principal {ι : Sort w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype (PLift ι)
rw [← iInf_plift_down, ← iInter_plift_down]
simpa using iInf_principal_finset Finset.univ (f <| PLift.down ·)
/-- A special case of `iInf_principal` that is safe to mark `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem iInf_principal' {ι : Type w} [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) : ⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) :=
iInf_principal _
#align filter.infi_principal Filter.iInf_principal
theorem iInf_principal_finite {ι : Type w} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set α) :
⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
lift s to Finset ι using hs
exact mod_cast iInf_principal_finset s f
#align filter.infi_principal_finite Filter.iInf_principal_finite
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
#align filter.join_mono Filter.join_mono
/-! ### Eventually -/
/-- `f.Eventually p` or `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | p x} ∈ f`. E.g., `∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that `p` holds true for sufficiently large `x`. -/
protected def Eventually (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
{ x | p x } ∈ f
#align filter.eventually Filter.Eventually
@[inherit_doc Filter.Eventually]
notation3 "∀ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p f) => r
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_iff Filter.eventually_iff
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_mem_set Filter.eventually_mem_set
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
#align filter.ext' Filter.ext'
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
#align filter.eventually.filter_mono Filter.Eventually.filter_mono
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
#align filter.eventually_of_mem Filter.eventually_of_mem
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
#align filter.eventually.and Filter.Eventually.and
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
#align filter.eventually_true Filter.eventually_true
theorem eventually_of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
#align filter.eventually_of_forall Filter.eventually_of_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
#align filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot Filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
#align filter.eventually_const Filter.eventually_const
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
#align filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem Filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
#align filter.eventually.exists_mem Filter.Eventually.exists_mem
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
#align filter.eventually.mp Filter.Eventually.mp
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (eventually_of_forall hq)
#align filter.eventually.mono Filter.Eventually.mono
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
#align filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall Filter.forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
#align filter.eventually_and Filter.eventually_and
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
#align filter.eventually.congr Filter.Eventually.congr
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
#align filter.eventually_congr Filter.eventually_congr
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p i x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using iInter_mem
#align filter.eventually_all Filter.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_all_finite {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using biInter_mem hI
#align filter.eventually_all_finite Filter.eventually_all_finite
alias _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_all := eventually_all_finite
#align set.finite.eventually_all Set.Finite.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Set.Finite.eventually_all
@[simp] theorem eventually_all_finset {ι} (I : Finset ι) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x :=
I.finite_toSet.eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_all_finset Filter.eventually_all_finset
alias _root_.Finset.eventually_all := eventually_all_finset
#align finset.eventually_all Finset.eventually_all
-- attribute [protected] Finset.eventually_all
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_left Filter.eventually_or_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
#align filter.eventually_or_distrib_right Filter.eventually_or_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
eventually_all
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
#align filter.eventually_bot Filter.eventually_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_top Filter.eventually_top
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_sup Filter.eventually_sup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_Sup Filter.eventually_sSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
#align filter.eventually_supr Filter.eventually_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.eventually_principal Filter.eventually_principal
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
#align filter.eventually_inf Filter.eventually_inf
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align filter.eventually_inf_principal Filter.eventually_inf_principal
/-! ### Frequently -/
/-- `f.Frequently p` or `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`. E.g., `∃ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that there exist arbitrarily large `x` for which `p` holds true. -/
protected def Frequently (p : α → Prop) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
¬∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x
#align filter.frequently Filter.Frequently
@[inherit_doc Filter.Frequently]
notation3 "∃ᶠ "(...)" in "f", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Frequently p f) => r
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
#align filter.eventually.frequently Filter.Eventually.frequently
theorem frequently_of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (eventually_of_forall h)
#align filter.frequently_of_forall Filter.frequently_of_forall
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
#align filter.frequently.mp Filter.Frequently.mp
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
#align filter.frequently.filter_mono Filter.Frequently.filter_mono
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (eventually_of_forall hpq)
#align filter.frequently.mono Filter.Frequently.mono
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
#align filter.frequently.and_eventually Filter.Frequently.and_eventually
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
#align filter.eventually.and_frequently Filter.Eventually.and_frequently
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := eventually_of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
#align filter.frequently.exists Filter.Frequently.exists
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
#align filter.eventually.exists Filter.Eventually.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp q hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
#align filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and Filter.frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
#align filter.frequently_iff Filter.frequently_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.not_eventually Filter.not_eventually
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
#align filter.not_frequently Filter.not_frequently
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
#align filter.frequently_true_iff_ne_bot Filter.frequently_true_iff_neBot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
#align filter.frequently_false Filter.frequently_false
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align filter.frequently_const Filter.frequently_const
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib Filter.frequently_or_distrib
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_left Filter.frequently_or_distrib_left
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
#align filter.frequently_or_distrib_right Filter.frequently_or_distrib_right
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib Filter.frequently_imp_distrib
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_left
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
#align filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right Filter.frequently_imp_distrib_right
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
#align filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right Filter.eventually_imp_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_left Filter.frequently_and_distrib_left
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
#align filter.frequently_and_distrib_right Filter.frequently_and_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
#align filter.frequently_bot Filter.frequently_bot
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
#align filter.frequently_top Filter.frequently_top
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 1,431 | 1,432 | theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by |
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Two
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
#align_import data.nat.totient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5cc2dfdd3e92f340411acea4427d701dc7ed26f8"
/-!
# Euler's totient function
This file defines [Euler's totient function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_totient_function)
`Nat.totient n` which counts the number of naturals less than `n` that are coprime with `n`.
We prove the divisor sum formula, namely that `n` equals `φ` summed over the divisors of `n`. See
`sum_totient`. We also prove two lemmas to help compute totients, namely `totient_mul` and
`totient_prime_pow`.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
/-- Euler's totient function. This counts the number of naturals strictly less than `n` which are
coprime with `n`. -/
def totient (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
((range n).filter n.Coprime).card
#align nat.totient Nat.totient
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "φ" => Nat.totient
@[simp]
theorem totient_zero : φ 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.totient_zero Nat.totient_zero
@[simp]
theorem totient_one : φ 1 = 1 := rfl
#align nat.totient_one Nat.totient_one
theorem totient_eq_card_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = ((range n).filter n.Coprime).card :=
rfl
#align nat.totient_eq_card_coprime Nat.totient_eq_card_coprime
/-- A characterisation of `Nat.totient` that avoids `Finset`. -/
theorem totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = Nat.card { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } := by
let e : { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } ≃ Finset.filter n.Coprime (Finset.range n) :=
{ toFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
invFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
left_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta] }
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, card_congr e, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
#align nat.totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime Nat.totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime
theorem totient_le (n : ℕ) : φ n ≤ n :=
((range n).card_filter_le _).trans_eq (card_range n)
#align nat.totient_le Nat.totient_le
theorem totient_lt (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 < n) : φ n < n :=
(card_lt_card (filter_ssubset.2 ⟨0, by simp [hn.ne', pos_of_gt hn]⟩)).trans_eq (card_range n)
#align nat.totient_lt Nat.totient_lt
@[simp]
theorem totient_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ}, φ n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => by decide
| n + 1 =>
suffices ∃ x < n + 1, (n + 1).gcd x = 1 by simpa [totient, filter_eq_empty_iff]
⟨1 % (n + 1), mod_lt _ n.succ_pos, by rw [gcd_comm, ← gcd_rec, gcd_one_right]⟩
@[simp] theorem totient_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < φ n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.totient_pos Nat.totient_pos
theorem filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient (a n : ℕ) :
((Ico n (n + a)).filter (Coprime a)).card = totient a := by
rw [totient, filter_Ico_card_eq_of_periodic, count_eq_card_filter_range]
exact periodic_coprime a
#align nat.filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient Nat.filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient
theorem Ico_filter_coprime_le {a : ℕ} (k n : ℕ) (a_pos : 0 < a) :
((Ico k (k + n)).filter (Coprime a)).card ≤ totient a * (n / a + 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n a]
induction' n / a with i ih
· rw [← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a k]
simp only [add_zero, mul_one, mul_zero, le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos),
Nat.zero_eq, zero_add]
-- Porting note: below line was `mono`
refine Finset.card_mono ?_
refine monotone_filter_left a.Coprime ?_
simp only [Finset.le_eq_subset]
exact Ico_subset_Ico rfl.le (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos)) k)
simp only [mul_succ]
simp_rw [← add_assoc] at ih ⊢
calc
(filter a.Coprime (Ico k (k + n % a + a * i + a))).card = (filter a.Coprime
(Ico k (k + n % a + a * i) ∪ Ico (k + n % a + a * i) (k + n % a + a * i + a))).card := by
congr
rw [Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico]
· rw [add_assoc]
exact le_self_add
exact le_self_add
_ ≤ (filter a.Coprime (Ico k (k + n % a + a * i))).card + a.totient := by
rw [filter_union, ← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a (k + n % a + a * i)]
apply card_union_le
_ ≤ a.totient * i + a.totient + a.totient := add_le_add_right ih (totient a)
#align nat.Ico_filter_coprime_le Nat.Ico_filter_coprime_le
open ZMod
/-- Note this takes an explicit `Fintype ((ZMod n)ˣ)` argument to avoid trouble with instance
diamonds. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ZMod.card_units_eq_totient (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] [Fintype (ZMod n)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = φ n :=
calc
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = Fintype.card { x : ZMod n // x.val.Coprime n } :=
Fintype.card_congr ZMod.unitsEquivCoprime
_ = φ n := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : ∃ m, n = m + 1 := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero NeZero.out
simp only [totient, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, Fintype.card_subtype, Finset.sum_filter, ←
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range, @Nat.coprime_comm (m + 1)]
rfl
#align zmod.card_units_eq_totient ZMod.card_units_eq_totient
theorem totient_even {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) : Even n.totient := by
haveI : Fact (1 < n) := ⟨one_lt_two.trans hn⟩
haveI : NeZero n := NeZero.of_gt hn
suffices 2 = orderOf (-1 : (ZMod n)ˣ) by
rw [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, even_iff_two_dvd, this]
exact orderOf_dvd_card
rw [← orderOf_units, Units.coe_neg_one, orderOf_neg_one, ringChar.eq (ZMod n) n, if_neg hn.ne']
#align nat.totient_even Nat.totient_even
theorem totient_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : φ (m * n) = φ m * φ n :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
cases' Nat.mul_eq_zero.1 hmn0 with h h <;>
simp only [totient_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, h]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
simp only [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient]
rw [Fintype.card_congr (Units.mapEquiv (ZMod.chineseRemainder h).toMulEquiv).toEquiv,
Fintype.card_congr (@MulEquiv.prodUnits (ZMod m) (ZMod n) _ _).toEquiv, Fintype.card_prod]
#align nat.totient_mul Nat.totient_mul
/-- For `d ∣ n`, the totient of `n/d` equals the number of values `k < n` such that `gcd n k = d` -/
theorem totient_div_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (hnd : d ∣ n) :
φ (n / d) = (filter (fun k : ℕ => n.gcd k = d) (range n)).card := by
rcases d.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hd0); · simp [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd hnd]
rcases hnd with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left x hd0]
apply Finset.card_bij fun k _ => d * k
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, and_imp, Coprime]
refine fun a ha1 ha2 => ⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).2 ha1, ?_⟩
rw [gcd_mul_left, ha2, mul_one]
· simp [hd0.ne']
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, exists_prop, and_imp]
refine fun b hb1 hb2 => ?_
have : d ∣ b := by
rw [← hb2]
apply gcd_dvd_right
rcases this with ⟨q, rfl⟩
refine ⟨q, ⟨⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).1 hb1, ?_⟩, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [gcd_mul_left, mul_right_eq_self_iff hd0] at hb2
#align nat.totient_div_of_dvd Nat.totient_div_of_dvd
theorem sum_totient (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sum φ = n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [← sum_div_divisors n φ]
have : n = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, (filter (fun k : ℕ => n.gcd k = d) (range n)).card := by
nth_rw 1 [← card_range n]
refine card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise fun x _ => mem_divisors.2 ⟨?_, hn.ne'⟩
apply gcd_dvd_left
nth_rw 3 [this]
exact sum_congr rfl fun x hx => totient_div_of_dvd (dvd_of_mem_divisors hx)
#align nat.sum_totient Nat.sum_totient
theorem sum_totient' (n : ℕ) : (∑ m ∈ (range n.succ).filter (· ∣ n), φ m) = n := by
convert sum_totient _ using 1
simp only [Nat.divisors, sum_filter, range_eq_Ico]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot] <;> simp
#align nat.sum_totient' Nat.sum_totient'
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ (n + 1)` is `p ^ n * (p - 1)` -/
theorem totient_prime_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) : φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = p ^ n * (p - 1) :=
calc
φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = ((range (p ^ (n + 1))).filter (Coprime (p ^ (n + 1)))).card :=
totient_eq_card_coprime _
_ = (range (p ^ (n + 1)) \ (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p)).card :=
(congr_arg card
(by
rw [sdiff_eq_filter]
apply filter_congr
simp only [mem_range, mem_filter, coprime_pow_left_iff n.succ_pos, mem_image, not_exists,
hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd]
intro a ha
constructor
· intro hap b h; rcases h with ⟨_, rfl⟩
exact hap (dvd_mul_left _ _)
· rintro h ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [pow_succ'] at ha
exact h b ⟨lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ha (zero_le _), mul_comm _ _⟩))
_ = _ := by
have h1 : Function.Injective (· * p) := mul_left_injective₀ hp.ne_zero
have h2 : (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p) ⊆ range (p ^ (n + 1)) := fun a => by
simp only [mem_image, mem_range, exists_imp]
rintro b ⟨h, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.pow_succ]
exact (mul_lt_mul_right hp.pos).2 h
rw [card_sdiff h2, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ h1, card_range, card_range, ←
one_mul (p ^ n), pow_succ', ← tsub_mul, one_mul, mul_comm]
#align nat.totient_prime_pow_succ Nat.totient_prime_pow_succ
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ n` is `p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1)` -/
theorem totient_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
φ (p ^ n) = p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1) := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact totient_prime_pow_succ hp _
#align nat.totient_prime_pow Nat.totient_prime_pow
theorem totient_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : φ p = p - 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, totient_prime_pow hp] <;> simp
#align nat.totient_prime Nat.totient_prime
theorem totient_eq_iff_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : p.totient = p - 1 ↔ p.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, totient_prime⟩
replace hp : 1 < p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne
· rwa [succ_le_iff]
· rintro rfl
rw [totient_one, tsub_self] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, range_eq_Ico, ← Ico_insert_succ_left hp.le, Finset.filter_insert,
if_neg (not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd hp (dvd_refl p) (dvd_zero p)), ← Nat.card_Ico 1 p] at h
refine
p.prime_of_coprime hp fun n hn hnz => Finset.filter_card_eq h n <| Finset.mem_Ico.mpr ⟨?_, hn⟩
rwa [succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.totient_eq_iff_prime Nat.totient_eq_iff_prime
theorem card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ ≤ p - 1 := by
haveI : NeZero p := ⟨(pos_of_gt hp).ne'⟩
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient p]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Nat.totient_lt p hp)
#align nat.card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one Nat.card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Totient.lean | 253 | 261 | theorem prime_iff_card_units (p : ℕ) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
p.Prime ↔ Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ = p - 1 := by |
cases' eq_zero_or_neZero p with hp hp
· subst hp
simp only [ZMod, not_prime_zero, false_iff_iff, zero_tsub]
-- the subst created a non-defeq but subsingleton instance diamond; resolve it
suffices Fintype.card ℤˣ ≠ 0 by convert this
simp
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, Nat.totient_eq_iff_prime <| NeZero.pos p]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
#align_import algebra.add_torsor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Torsors of additive group actions
This file defines torsors of additive group actions.
## Notations
The group elements are referred to as acting on points. This file
defines the notation `+ᵥ` for adding a group element to a point and
`-ᵥ` for subtracting two points to produce a group element.
## Implementation notes
Affine spaces are the motivating example of torsors of additive group actions. It may be appropriate
to refactor in terms of the general definition of group actions, via `to_additive`, when there is a
use for multiplicative torsors (currently mathlib only develops the theory of group actions for
multiplicative group actions).
## Notations
* `v +ᵥ p` is a notation for `VAdd.vadd`, the left action of an additive monoid;
* `p₁ -ᵥ p₂` is a notation for `VSub.vsub`, difference between two points in an additive torsor
as an element of the corresponding additive group;
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
/-- An `AddTorsor G P` gives a structure to the nonempty type `P`,
acted on by an `AddGroup G` with a transitive and free action given
by the `+ᵥ` operation and a corresponding subtraction given by the
`-ᵥ` operation. In the case of a vector space, it is an affine
space. -/
class AddTorsor (G : outParam Type*) (P : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddAction G P,
VSub G P where
[nonempty : Nonempty P]
/-- Torsor subtraction and addition with the same element cancels out. -/
vsub_vadd' : ∀ p₁ p₂ : P, (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G) +ᵥ p₂ = p₁
/-- Torsor addition and subtraction with the same element cancels out. -/
vadd_vsub' : ∀ (g : G) (p : P), g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g
#align add_torsor AddTorsor
-- Porting note(#12096): removed `nolint instance_priority`; lint not ported yet
attribute [instance 100] AddTorsor.nonempty
-- Porting note(#12094): removed nolint; dangerous_instance linter not ported yet
--attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] AddTorsor.toVSub
/-- An `AddGroup G` is a torsor for itself. -/
-- Porting note(#12096): linter not ported yet
--@[nolint instance_priority]
instance addGroupIsAddTorsor (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] : AddTorsor G G where
vsub := Sub.sub
vsub_vadd' := sub_add_cancel
vadd_vsub' := add_sub_cancel_right
#align add_group_is_add_torsor addGroupIsAddTorsor
/-- Simplify subtraction for a torsor for an `AddGroup G` over
itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem vsub_eq_sub {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] (g₁ g₂ : G) : g₁ -ᵥ g₂ = g₁ - g₂ :=
rfl
#align vsub_eq_sub vsub_eq_sub
section General
variable {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [AddGroup G] [T : AddTorsor G P]
/-- Adding the result of subtracting from another point produces that
point. -/
@[simp]
theorem vsub_vadd (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ +ᵥ p₂ = p₁ :=
AddTorsor.vsub_vadd' p₁ p₂
#align vsub_vadd vsub_vadd
/-- Adding a group element then subtracting the original point
produces that group element. -/
@[simp]
theorem vadd_vsub (g : G) (p : P) : g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g :=
AddTorsor.vadd_vsub' g p
#align vadd_vsub vadd_vsub
/-- If the same point added to two group elements produces equal
results, those group elements are equal. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddTorsor.lean | 98 | 100 | theorem vadd_right_cancel {g₁ g₂ : G} (p : P) (h : g₁ +ᵥ p = g₂ +ᵥ p) : g₁ = g₂ := by |
-- Porting note: vadd_vsub g₁ → vadd_vsub g₁ p
rw [← vadd_vsub g₁ p, h, vadd_vsub]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Init.Function
#align_import data.option.n_ary from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"995b47e555f1b6297c7cf16855f1023e355219fb"
/-!
# Binary map of options
This file defines the binary map of `Option`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations
on intervals.
## Main declarations
* `Option.map₂`: Binary map of options.
## Notes
This file is very similar to the n-ary section of `Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic`, to
`Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry` and to `Mathlib.Order.Filter.NAry`. Please keep them in sync.
(porting note - only some of these may exist right now!)
We do not define `Option.map₃` as its only purpose so far would be to prove properties of
`Option.map₂` and casing already fulfills this task.
-/
universe u
open Function
namespace Option
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {f : α → β → γ} {a : Option α} {b : Option β} {c : Option γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Option α → Option β → Option γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) : Option γ :=
a.bind fun a => b.map <| f a
#align option.map₂ Option.map₂
/-- `Option.map₂` in terms of monadic operations. Note that this can't be taken as the definition
because of the lack of universe polymorphism. -/
theorem map₂_def {α β γ : Type u} (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
map₂ f a b = f <$> a <*> b := by
cases a <;> rfl
#align option.map₂_def Option.map₂_def
-- Porting note (#10618): In Lean3, was `@[simp]` but now `simp` can prove it
theorem map₂_some_some (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f (some a) (some b) = f a b := rfl
#align option.map₂_some_some Option.map₂_some_some
theorem map₂_coe_coe (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f a b = f a b := rfl
#align option.map₂_coe_coe Option.map₂_coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem map₂_none_left (f : α → β → γ) (b : Option β) : map₂ f none b = none := rfl
#align option.map₂_none_left Option.map₂_none_left
@[simp]
theorem map₂_none_right (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) : map₂ f a none = none := by cases a <;> rfl
#align option.map₂_none_right Option.map₂_none_right
@[simp]
theorem map₂_coe_left (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : Option β) : map₂ f a b = b.map fun b => f a b :=
rfl
#align option.map₂_coe_left Option.map₂_coe_left
-- Porting note: This proof was `rfl` in Lean3, but now is not.
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Option/NAry.lean | 73 | 74 | theorem map₂_coe_right (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : β) :
map₂ f a b = a.map fun a => f a b := by | cases a <;> rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
#align_import linear_algebra.projective_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4658a649d216f57e99621708b09dcb3dcccbd23"
/-!
# Projective Spaces
This file contains the definition of the projectivization of a vector space over a field,
as well as the bijection between said projectivization and the collection of all one
dimensional subspaces of the vector space.
## Notation
`ℙ K V` is localized notation for `Projectivization K V`, the projectivization of a `K`-vector
space `V`.
## Constructing terms of `ℙ K V`.
We have three ways to construct terms of `ℙ K V`:
- `Projectivization.mk K v hv` where `v : V` and `hv : v ≠ 0`.
- `Projectivization.mk' K v` where `v : { w : V // w ≠ 0 }`.
- `Projectivization.mk'' H h` where `H : Submodule K V` and `h : finrank H = 1`.
## Other definitions
- For `v : ℙ K V`, `v.submodule` gives the corresponding submodule of `V`.
- `Projectivization.equivSubmodule` is the equivalence between `ℙ K V`
and `{ H : Submodule K V // finrank H = 1 }`.
- For `v : ℙ K V`, `v.rep : V` is a representative of `v`.
-/
variable (K V : Type*) [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
/-- The setoid whose quotient is the projectivization of `V`. -/
def projectivizationSetoid : Setoid { v : V // v ≠ 0 } :=
(MulAction.orbitRel Kˣ V).comap (↑)
#align projectivization_setoid projectivizationSetoid
/-- The projectivization of the `K`-vector space `V`.
The notation `ℙ K V` is preferred. -/
def Projectivization := Quotient (projectivizationSetoid K V)
#align projectivization Projectivization
/-- We define notations `ℙ K V` for the projectivization of the `K`-vector space `V`. -/
scoped[LinearAlgebra.Projectivization] notation "ℙ" => Projectivization
namespace Projectivization
open scoped LinearAlgebra.Projectivization
variable {V}
/-- Construct an element of the projectivization from a nonzero vector. -/
def mk (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : ℙ K V :=
Quotient.mk'' ⟨v, hv⟩
#align projectivization.mk Projectivization.mk
/-- A variant of `Projectivization.mk` in terms of a subtype. `mk` is preferred. -/
def mk' (v : { v : V // v ≠ 0 }) : ℙ K V :=
Quotient.mk'' v
#align projectivization.mk' Projectivization.mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_mk (v : { v : V // v ≠ 0 }) : mk' K v = mk K ↑v v.2 := rfl
#align projectivization.mk'_eq_mk Projectivization.mk'_eq_mk
instance [Nontrivial V] : Nonempty (ℙ K V) :=
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := exists_ne (0 : V)
⟨mk K v hv⟩
variable {K}
/-- Choose a representative of `v : Projectivization K V` in `V`. -/
protected noncomputable def rep (v : ℙ K V) : V :=
v.out'
#align projectivization.rep Projectivization.rep
theorem rep_nonzero (v : ℙ K V) : v.rep ≠ 0 :=
v.out'.2
#align projectivization.rep_nonzero Projectivization.rep_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem mk_rep (v : ℙ K V) : mk K v.rep v.rep_nonzero = v := Quotient.out_eq' _
#align projectivization.mk_rep Projectivization.mk_rep
open FiniteDimensional
/-- Consider an element of the projectivization as a submodule of `V`. -/
protected def submodule (v : ℙ K V) : Submodule K V :=
(Quotient.liftOn' v fun v => K ∙ (v : V)) <| by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨x, rfl : x • b = a⟩
exact Submodule.span_singleton_group_smul_eq _ x _
#align projectivization.submodule Projectivization.submodule
variable (K)
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff (v w : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
mk K v hv = mk K w hw ↔ ∃ a : Kˣ, a • w = v :=
Quotient.eq''
#align projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff Projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff
/-- Two nonzero vectors go to the same point in projective space if and only if one is
a scalar multiple of the other. -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff' (v w : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
mk K v hv = mk K w hw ↔ ∃ a : K, a • w = v := by
rw [mk_eq_mk_iff K v w hv hw]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
refine ⟨Units.mk0 a fun c => hv.symm ?_, ha⟩
rwa [c, zero_smul] at ha
#align projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff' Projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff'
theorem exists_smul_eq_mk_rep (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : ∃ a : Kˣ, a • v = (mk K v hv).rep :=
(mk_eq_mk_iff K _ _ (rep_nonzero _) hv).1 (mk_rep _)
#align projectivization.exists_smul_eq_mk_rep Projectivization.exists_smul_eq_mk_rep
variable {K}
/-- An induction principle for `Projectivization`.
Use as `induction v using Projectivization.ind`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem ind {P : ℙ K V → Prop} (h : ∀ (v : V) (h : v ≠ 0), P (mk K v h)) : ∀ p, P p :=
Quotient.ind' <| Subtype.rec <| h
#align projectivization.ind Projectivization.ind
@[simp]
theorem submodule_mk (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : (mk K v hv).submodule = K ∙ v :=
rfl
#align projectivization.submodule_mk Projectivization.submodule_mk
theorem submodule_eq (v : ℙ K V) : v.submodule = K ∙ v.rep := by
conv_lhs => rw [← v.mk_rep]
rfl
#align projectivization.submodule_eq Projectivization.submodule_eq
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projectivization/Basic.lean | 142 | 144 | theorem finrank_submodule (v : ℙ K V) : finrank K v.submodule = 1 := by |
rw [submodule_eq]
exact finrank_span_singleton v.rep_nonzero
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.int.gcd from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a1a73351de8dd6c8d3d32b569c8e434b03ca47"
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
#align nat.xgcd_aux Nat.xgcdAux
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
#align nat.xgcd_zero_left Nat.xgcd_zero_left
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
#align nat.xgcd_aux_rec Nat.xgcdAux_rec
/-- Use the extended GCD algorithm to generate the `a` and `b` values
satisfying `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
#align nat.xgcd Nat.xgcd
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
#align nat.gcd_a Nat.gcdA
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
#align nat.gcd_b Nat.gcdB
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
#align nat.gcd_a_zero_left Nat.gcdA_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
#align nat.gcd_b_zero_left Nat.gcdB_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
#align nat.gcd_a_zero_right Nat.gcdA_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
#align nat.gcd_b_zero_right Nat.gcdB_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
#align nat.xgcd_aux_fst Nat.xgcdAux_fst
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
#align nat.xgcd_aux_val Nat.xgcdAux_val
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
#align nat.xgcd_val Nat.xgcd_val
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align nat.xgcd_aux_P Nat.xgcdAux_P
/-- **Bézout's lemma**: given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`, where `a = gcd_a x y` and
`b = gcd_b x y` are computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm.
-/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
#align nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
end
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd {k n : ℕ} (hk : gcd n k < k) : ∃ m, n * m % k = gcd n k := by
have hk' := Int.ofNat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le (gcd n k)) hk))
have key := congr_arg (fun (m : ℤ) => (m % k).toNat) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab n k)
simp only at key
rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, ← Int.natCast_mod, Int.toNat_natCast, mod_eq_of_lt hk] at key
refine ⟨(n.gcdA k % k).toNat, Eq.trans (Int.ofNat.inj ?_) key.symm⟩
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_mod, Int.ofNat_mul, Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'),
Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.mul_emod, Int.emod_emod,
← Int.mul_emod]
#align nat.exists_mul_mod_eq_gcd Nat.exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime {k n : ℕ} (hkn : Coprime n k) (hk : 1 < k) :
∃ m, n * m % k = 1 :=
Exists.recOn (exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq hkn) hk)) fun m hm ↦
⟨m, hm.trans hkn⟩
#align nat.exists_mul_mod_eq_one_of_coprime Nat.exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime
end Nat
/-! ### Divisibility over ℤ -/
namespace Int
theorem gcd_def (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = Nat.gcd i.natAbs j.natAbs := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma gcd_natCast_natCast (m n : ℕ) : gcd ↑m ↑n = m.gcd n := rfl
#align int.coe_nat_gcd Int.gcd_natCast_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_gcd := Int.gcd_natCast_natCast
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| ofNat m, n => m.gcdA n.natAbs
| -[m+1], n => -m.succ.gcdA n.natAbs
#align int.gcd_a Int.gcdA
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| m, ofNat n => m.natAbs.gcdB n
| m, -[n+1] => -m.natAbs.gcdB n.succ
#align int.gcd_b Int.gcdB
/-- **Bézout's lemma** -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : ∀ x y : ℤ, (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab _ _
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = _ + -(n + 1) * -_ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + _ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + -(n + 1) * -_ by
rw [Int.neg_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_neg]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
#align int.gcd_eq_gcd_ab Int.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
#align int.lcm Int.lcm
theorem lcm_def (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = Nat.lcm (natAbs i) (natAbs j) :=
rfl
#align int.lcm_def Int.lcm_def
protected theorem coe_nat_lcm (m n : ℕ) : Int.lcm ↑m ↑n = Nat.lcm m n :=
rfl
#align int.coe_nat_lcm Int.coe_nat_lcm
#align int.gcd_dvd_left Int.gcd_dvd_left
#align int.gcd_dvd_right Int.gcd_dvd_right
theorem dvd_gcd {i j k : ℤ} (h1 : k ∣ i) (h2 : k ∣ j) : k ∣ gcd i j :=
natAbs_dvd.1 <|
natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| Nat.dvd_gcd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h2)
#align int.dvd_gcd Int.dvd_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j * lcm i j = natAbs (i * j) := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.lcm, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm, natAbs_mul]
#align int.gcd_mul_lcm Int.gcd_mul_lcm
theorem gcd_comm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = gcd j i :=
Nat.gcd_comm _ _
#align int.gcd_comm Int.gcd_comm
theorem gcd_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (gcd i j) k = gcd i (gcd j k) :=
Nat.gcd_assoc _ _ _
#align int.gcd_assoc Int.gcd_assoc
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (i : ℤ) : gcd i i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
#align int.gcd_self Int.gcd_self
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 237 | 237 | theorem gcd_zero_left (i : ℤ) : gcd 0 i = natAbs i := by | simp [gcd]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e7f0ddbf65bd7181a85edb74b64bdc35ba4bdc74"
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
assert_not_exists Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
#align ideal.map Ideal.map
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
#align ideal.comap Ideal.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
#align ideal.map_mono Ideal.map_mono
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
#align ideal.mem_map_of_mem Ideal.mem_map_of_mem
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
#align ideal.apply_coe_mem_map Ideal.apply_coe_mem_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
#align ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.mem_comap Ideal.mem_comap
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
#align ideal.comap_mono Ideal.comap_mono
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
#align ideal.comap_ne_top Ideal.comap_ne_top
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R] [rcg : RingHomClass G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : Ideal R) (hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
#align ideal.map_le_comap_of_inv_on Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inv_on
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g := fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
#align ideal.comap_le_map_of_inv_on Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inv_on
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal R) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
#align ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
#align ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
#align ideal.is_prime.comap Ideal.IsPrime.comap
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
#align ideal.map_top Ideal.map_top
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align ideal.gc_map_comap Ideal.gc_map_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
#align ideal.comap_id Ideal.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
#align ideal.map_id Ideal.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align ideal.comap_comap Ideal.comap_comap
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
#align ideal.map_map Ideal.map_map
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
#align ideal.map_span Ideal.map_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
#align ideal.map_le_of_le_comap Ideal.map_le_of_le_comap
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
#align ideal.le_comap_of_map_le Ideal.le_comap_of_map_le
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align ideal.le_comap_map Ideal.le_comap_map
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align ideal.map_comap_le Ideal.map_comap_le
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align ideal.comap_top Ideal.comap_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
#align ideal.comap_eq_top_iff Ideal.comap_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align ideal.map_bot Ideal.map_bot
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
#align ideal.map_comap_map Ideal.map_comap_map
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
#align ideal.comap_map_comap Ideal.comap_map_comap
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
#align ideal.map_sup Ideal.map_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
#align ideal.comap_inf Ideal.comap_inf
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
#align ideal.map_supr Ideal.map_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
#align ideal.comap_infi Ideal.comap_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
#align ideal.map_Sup Ideal.map_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
#align ideal.comap_Inf Ideal.comap_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
#align ideal.comap_Inf' Ideal.comap_sInf'
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
⟨comap_ne_top f H.ne_top, fun {x y} h => H.mem_or_mem <| by rwa [mem_comap, map_mul] at h⟩
#align ideal.comap_is_prime Ideal.comap_isPrime
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
#align ideal.map_inf_le Ideal.map_inf_le
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
#align ideal.le_comap_sup Ideal.le_comap_sup
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact (_root_.map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _)
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
#align ideal.smul_top_eq_map Ideal.smul_top_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
#align ideal.coe_restrict_scalars Ideal.coe_restrictScalars
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I J : Ideal S) : (I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ hx =>
Submodule.mul_induction_on hx (fun _ hx _ hy => Submodule.mul_mem_mul hx hy) fun _ _ =>
Submodule.add_mem _)
(Submodule.mul_le.mpr fun _ hx _ hy => Ideal.mul_mem_mul hx hy)
#align ideal.restrict_scalars_mul Ideal.restrictScalars_mul
section Surjective
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
#align ideal.map_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_comap_of_surjective
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
#align ideal.gi_map_comap Ideal.giMapComap
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
#align ideal.map_surjective_of_surjective Ideal.map_surjective_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
#align ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective Ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
#align ideal.map_sup_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_sup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
#align ideal.map_supr_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_iSup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
#align ideal.map_inf_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_inf_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
#align ideal.map_infi_comap_of_surjective Ideal.map_iInf_comap_of_surjective
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction H (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
#align ideal.mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective Ideal.mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
#align ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective Ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
#align ideal.le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective Ideal.le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
#align ideal.map_eq_submodule_map Ideal.map_eq_submodule_map
end Surjective
section Injective
variable (hf : Function.Injective f)
theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
#align ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective
theorem comap_bot_of_injective : Ideal.comap f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp (Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf)
#align ideal.comap_bot_of_injective Ideal.comap_bot_of_injective
end Injective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm (map f I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_of_equiv (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_map,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
#align ideal.map_of_equiv Ideal.map_of_equiv
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`,
then `comap f (comap f.symm I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_of_equiv (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, comap_comap,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, comap_id]
#align ideal.comap_of_equiv Ideal.comap_of_equiv
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
theorem map_comap_of_equiv (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.left_inv' _))
(Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.right_inv' _))
#align ideal.map_comap_of_equiv Ideal.map_comap_of_equiv
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `comap f.symm I = map f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm (I : Ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.comap f.symm = I.map f :=
(map_comap_of_equiv I f).symm
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm I = comap f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_symm (I : Ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map f.symm = I.comap f :=
map_comap_of_equiv I (RingEquiv.symm f)
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
section Surjective
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (I : Ideal R) : comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm
(fun r h =>
let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h
Submodule.mem_sup.2
⟨s, hsi, r - s, (Submodule.mem_bot S).2 <| by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
#align ideal.comap_map_of_surjective Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def relIsoOfSurjective : Ideal S ≃o { p : Ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } where
toFun J := ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩
invFun I := map f I.1
left_inv J := map_comap_of_surjective f hf J
right_inv I :=
Subtype.eq <|
show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1 from
(comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left
map_rel_iff' {I1 I2} :=
⟨fun H => map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸ map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H,
comap_mono⟩
#align ideal.rel_iso_of_surjective Ideal.relIsoOfSurjective
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def orderEmbeddingOfSurjective : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R :=
(relIsoOfSurjective f hf).toRelEmbedding.trans (Subtype.relEmbedding (fun x y => x ≤ y) _)
#align ideal.order_embedding_of_surjective Ideal.orderEmbeddingOfSurjective
theorem map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} (H : IsMaximal I) :
map f I = ⊤ ∨ IsMaximal (map f I) := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun ne_top => ⟨⟨fun h => ne_top h, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
· refine
(relIsoOfSurjective f hf).injective
(Subtype.ext_iff.2 (Eq.trans (H.1.2 (comap f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne ?_ ?_)) comap_top.symm))
· exact map_le_iff_le_comap.1 (le_of_lt hJ)
· exact fun h => hJ.right (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf (le_of_eq h.symm))
#align ideal.map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective Ideal.map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective
theorem comap_isMaximal_of_surjective {K : Ideal S} [H : IsMaximal K] : IsMaximal (comap f K) := by
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
suffices map f J = ⊤ by
have := congr_arg (comap f) this
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this
rw [eq_top_iff]
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)))
refine
H.1.2 (map f J)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ)) fun h =>
ne_of_lt hJ (_root_.trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) ?_))
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left]
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
#align ideal.comap_is_maximal_of_surjective Ideal.comap_isMaximal_of_surjective
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨fun h => (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h), fun h =>
le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
#align ideal.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective Ideal.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective
end Surjective
section Bijective
variable (hf : Function.Bijective f)
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def relIsoOfBijective : Ideal S ≃o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
invFun := map f
left_inv := (relIsoOfSurjective f hf.right).left_inv
right_inv J :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1
((relIsoOfSurjective f hf.right).right_inv ⟨J, comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf.left⟩)
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := (relIsoOfSurjective f hf.right).map_rel_iff'
#align ideal.rel_iso_of_bijective Ideal.relIsoOfBijective
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map {I : Ideal R} {K : Ideal S} : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨fun h => le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h, fun h =>
(relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I ▸ comap_mono h⟩
#align ideal.comap_le_iff_le_map Ideal.comap_le_iff_le_map
theorem map.isMaximal {I : Ideal R} (H : IsMaximal I) : IsMaximal (map f I) := by
refine
or_iff_not_imp_left.1 (map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective f hf.right H) fun h => H.1.1 ?_
calc
I = comap f (map f I) := ((relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I).symm
_ = comap f ⊤ := by rw [h]
_ = ⊤ := by rw [comap_top]
#align ideal.map.is_maximal Ideal.map.isMaximal
end Bijective
theorem RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff (e : R ≃+* S) :
(⊥ : Ideal R).IsMaximal ↔ (⊥ : Ideal S).IsMaximal :=
⟨fun h => map_bot (f := e.toRingHom) ▸ map.isMaximal e.toRingHom e.bijective h, fun h =>
map_bot (f := e.symm.toRingHom) ▸ map.isMaximal e.symm.toRingHom e.symm.bijective h⟩
#align ideal.ring_equiv.bot_maximal_iff Ideal.RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {F : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_mul : map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj =>
show (f (r * s)) ∈ map f I * map f J by
rw [_root_.map_mul]; exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(span_mul_span (↑f '' ↑I) (↑f '' ↑J) ▸ (span_le.2 <|
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun i ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩ =>
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun j ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩ =>
Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 <|
hfri ▸ hfsj ▸ by rw [← _root_.map_mul]; exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj)))
#align ideal.map_mul Ideal.map_mul
/-- The pushforward `Ideal.map` as a monoid-with-zero homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom : Ideal R →*₀ Ideal S where
toFun := map f
map_mul' I J := Ideal.map_mul f I J
map_one' := by simp only [one_eq_top]; exact Ideal.map_top f
map_zero' := Ideal.map_bot
#align ideal.map_hom Ideal.mapHom
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I ^ n) = map f I ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) I n
#align ideal.map_pow Ideal.map_pow
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) := by
ext
simp [radical]
#align ideal.comap_radical Ideal.comap_radical
variable {K}
theorem IsRadical.comap (hK : K.IsRadical) : (comap f K).IsRadical := by
rw [← hK.radical, comap_radical]
apply radical_isRadical
#align ideal.is_radical.comap Ideal.IsRadical.comap
variable {I J L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun r ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
#align ideal.map_radical_le Ideal.map_radical_le
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
(map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl)
#align ideal.le_comap_mul Ideal.le_comap_mul
theorem le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) : K.comap f ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f := by
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact rfl.le
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (Ideal.mul_mono_left n_ih).trans (Ideal.le_comap_mul f)
#align ideal.le_comap_pow Ideal.le_comap_pow
end CommRing
end MapAndComap
end Ideal
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rcf : RingHomClass F R S] [FunLike G T S] [rcg : RingHomClass G T S]
variable (f : F) (g : G)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : Ideal R :=
Ideal.comap f ⊥
#align ring_hom.ker RingHom.ker
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero. -/
theorem mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 := by rw [ker, Ideal.mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot]
#align ring_hom.mem_ker RingHom.mem_ker
theorem ker_eq : (ker f : Set R) = Set.preimage f {0} :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.ker_eq RingHom.ker_eq
theorem ker_eq_comap_bot (f : F) : ker f = Ideal.comap f ⊥ :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot
theorem comap_ker (f : S →+* R) (g : T →+* S) : f.ker.comap g = ker (f.comp g) := by
rw [RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, Ideal.comap_comap, RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
#align ring_hom.comap_ker RingHom.comap_ker
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel. -/
theorem not_one_mem_ker [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : (1 : R) ∉ ker f := by
rw [mem_ker, map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
#align ring_hom.not_one_mem_ker RingHom.not_one_mem_ker
theorem ker_ne_top [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : ker f ≠ ⊤ :=
(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).mpr <| not_one_mem_ker f
#align ring_hom.ker_ne_top RingHom.ker_ne_top
lemma _root_.Pi.ker_ringHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
(φ : ∀ i, S →+* R i) : ker (Pi.ringHom φ) = ⨅ i, ker (φ i) := by
ext x
simp [mem_ker, Ideal.mem_iInf, Function.funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeSRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeSRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Semiring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
theorem injective_iff_ker_eq_bot : Function.Injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, ker_eq, Set.ext_iff]
exact injective_iff_map_eq_zero' f
#align ring_hom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 → x = 0 := by
rw [← injective_iff_map_eq_zero f, injective_iff_ker_eq_bot]
#align ring_hom.ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero RingHom.ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 655 | 656 | theorem ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) : ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ := by |
simpa only [← injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] using EquivLike.injective f
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
/-!
# Hausdorff distance
The Hausdorff distance on subsets of a metric (or emetric) space.
Given two subsets `s` and `t` of a metric space, their Hausdorff distance is the smallest `d`
such that any point `s` is within `d` of a point in `t`, and conversely. This quantity
is often infinite (think of `s` bounded and `t` unbounded), and therefore better
expressed in the setting of emetric spaces.
## Main definitions
This files introduces:
* `EMetric.infEdist x s`, the infimum edistance of a point `x` to a set `s` in an emetric space
* `EMetric.hausdorffEdist s t`, the Hausdorff edistance of two sets in an emetric space
* Versions of these notions on metric spaces, called respectively `Metric.infDist`
and `Metric.hausdorffDist`
## Main results
* `infEdist_closure`: the edistance to a set and its closure coincide
* `EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero`: a point `x` belongs to the closure of `s` iff
`infEdist x s = 0`
* `IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist`: if `s` is compact and non-empty, there exists a point `y`
which attains this edistance
* `IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed`: every open set `U` can be written as the increasing union
of countably many closed subsets of `U`
* `hausdorffEdist_closure`: replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance
* `hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure`: two sets have Hausdorff edistance zero
iff their closures coincide
* the Hausdorff edistance is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
* in particular, closed sets in an emetric space are an emetric space
(this is shown in `EMetricSpace.closeds.emetricspace`)
* versions of these notions on metric spaces
* `hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded`: if two sets in a metric space
are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff edistance.
## Tags
metric space, Hausdorff distance
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The minimal edistance of a point to a set -/
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
#align emetric.inf_edist EMetric.infEdist
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align emetric.inf_edist_empty EMetric.infEdist_empty
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
#align emetric.le_inf_edist EMetric.le_infEdist
/-- The edist to a union is the minimum of the edists -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
#align emetric.inf_edist_union EMetric.infEdist_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
#align emetric.inf_edist_Union EMetric.infEdist_iUnion
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
/-- The edist to a singleton is the edistance to the single point of this singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
#align emetric.inf_edist_singleton EMetric.infEdist_singleton
/-- The edist to a set is bounded above by the edist to any of its points -/
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem
/-- If a point `x` belongs to `s`, then its edist to `s` vanishes -/
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
#align emetric.inf_edist_zero_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_zero_of_mem
/-- The edist is antitone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
#align emetric.inf_edist_anti EMetric.infEdist_anti
/-- The edist to a set is `< r` iff there exists a point in the set at edistance `< r` -/
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align emetric.inf_edist_lt_iff EMetric.infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The edist of `x` to `s` is bounded by the sum of the edist of `y` to `s` and
the edist from `x` to `y` -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun z _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
theorem infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y + infEdist y s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_add_inf_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist
theorem edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ infEdist x s + diam s := by
simp_rw [infEdist, ENNReal.iInf_add]
refine le_iInf₂ fun i hi => ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x i + edist i y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ edist x i + diam s := add_le_add le_rfl (edist_le_diam_of_mem hi hy)
#align emetric.edist_le_inf_edist_add_ediam EMetric.edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam
/-- The edist to a set depends continuously on the point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infEdist : Continuous fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_of_le_add_edist 1 (by simp) <| by
simp only [one_mul, infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist, forall₂_true_iff]
#align emetric.continuous_inf_edist EMetric.continuous_infEdist
/-- The edist to a set and to its closure coincide -/
theorem infEdist_closure : infEdist x (closure s) = infEdist x s := by
refine le_antisymm (infEdist_anti subset_closure) ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_
have ε0 : 0 < (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x (closure s) < infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right h.ne ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨y : α, ycs : y ∈ closure s, hy : edist x y < infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
obtain ⟨z : α, zs : z ∈ s, dyz : edist y z < ↑ε / 2⟩ := EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 ycs (ε / 2) ε0
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zs
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_le_add (le_of_lt hy) (le_of_lt dyz)
_ = infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero : x ∈ closure s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← infEdist_closure]
exact infEdist_zero_of_mem h,
fun h =>
EMetric.mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => infEdist_lt_iff.mp <| by rwa [h]⟩
#align emetric.mem_closure_iff_inf_edist_zero EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed (h : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, h.closure_eq]
#align emetric.mem_iff_inf_edist_zero_of_closed EMetric.mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed
/-- The infimum edistance of a point to a set is positive if and only if the point is not in the
closure of the set. -/
theorem infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x E ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align emetric.inf_edist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x (closure E) ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [infEdist_closure, infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ENNReal.ofReal ε < infEdist x E := by
rw [← infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure, ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn] at h
rcases h with ⟨ε, ⟨_, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨ε, ⟨ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mp ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
#align emetric.exists_real_pos_lt_inf_edist_of_not_mem_closure EMetric.exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < infEdist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s := by
rw [disjoint_left]
intro y hy h'y
apply lt_irrefl (infEdist x s)
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x y := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h'y
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall, edist_comm] at hy
_ < infEdist x s := h
#align emetric.disjoint_closed_ball_of_lt_inf_edist EMetric.disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist
/-- The infimum edistance is invariant under isometries -/
theorem infEdist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infEdist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infEdist x t := by
simp only [infEdist, iInf_image, hΦ.edist_eq]
#align emetric.inf_edist_image EMetric.infEdist_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_smul {M} [SMul M α] [IsometricSMul M α] (c : M) (x : α) (s : Set α) :
infEdist (c • x) (c • s) = infEdist x s :=
infEdist_image (isometry_smul _ _)
#align emetric.inf_edist_smul EMetric.infEdist_smul
#align emetric.inf_edist_vadd EMetric.infEdist_vadd
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed {U : Set α} (hU : IsOpen U) :
∃ F : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, IsClosed (F n)) ∧ (∀ n, F n ⊆ U) ∧ ⋃ n, F n = U ∧ Monotone F := by
obtain ⟨a, a_pos, a_lt_one⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < a ∧ a < 1 := exists_between zero_lt_one
let F := fun n : ℕ => (fun x => infEdist x Uᶜ) ⁻¹' Ici (a ^ n)
have F_subset : ∀ n, F n ⊆ U := fun n x hx ↦ by
by_contra h
have : infEdist x Uᶜ ≠ 0 := ((ENNReal.pow_pos a_pos _).trans_le hx).ne'
exact this (infEdist_zero_of_mem h)
refine ⟨F, fun n => IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Ici, F_subset, ?_, ?_⟩
· show ⋃ n, F n = U
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp only [iUnion_subset_iff, F_subset, forall_const]) fun x hx => ?_
have : ¬x ∈ Uᶜ := by simpa using hx
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed hU.isClosed_compl] at this
have B : 0 < infEdist x Uᶜ := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using this
have : Filter.Tendsto (fun n => a ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one a_lt_one
rcases ((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ B).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Ici, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨n, hn.le⟩
show Monotone F
intro m n hmn x hx
simp only [F, mem_Ici, mem_preimage] at hx ⊢
apply le_trans (pow_le_pow_right_of_le_one' a_lt_one.le hmn) hx
#align is_open.exists_Union_is_closed IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infEdist x s = edist x y := by
have A : Continuous fun y => edist x y := continuous_const.edist continuous_id
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne A.continuousOn
exact ⟨y, ys, le_antisymm (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) (by rwa [le_infEdist])⟩
#align is_compact.exists_inf_edist_eq_edist IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist
theorem exists_pos_forall_lt_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hst : Disjoint s t) :
∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (r : ℝ≥0∞) < edist x y := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· use 1
simp
obtain ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne continuous_infEdist.continuousOn
have : 0 < infEdist x t :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => hst.le_bot ⟨hx, (mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht).mpr H⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 this with ⟨r, h₀, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ENNReal.coe_pos.mp h₀, fun y hy z hz => hr.trans_le <| le_infEdist.1 (h hy) z hz⟩
#align emetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist EMetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist
end InfEdist
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between two sets is the smallest `r` such that each set
is contained in the `r`-neighborhood of the other one -/
irreducible_def hausdorffEdist {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (s t : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(⨆ x ∈ s, infEdist x t) ⊔ ⨆ y ∈ t, infEdist y s
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_def EMetric.hausdorffEdist_def
section HausdorffEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t u : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-- The Hausdorff edistance of a set to itself vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self : hausdorffEdist s s = 0 := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_idem, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
exact fun x hx => infEdist_zero_of_mem hx
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_self EMetric.hausdorffEdist_self
/-- The Haudorff edistances of `s` to `t` and of `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_comm : hausdorffEdist s t = hausdorffEdist t s := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def]; apply sup_comm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_comm EMetric.hausdorffEdist_comm
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by bounding the edistance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infEdist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
exact ⟨H1, H2⟩
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_inf_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, edist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist (fun x xs ↦ ?_) (fun x xt ↦ ?_)
· rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem yt) hy
· rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) hy
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_mem_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
theorem infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
refine le_trans ?_ le_sup_left
exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) x h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_Hausdorff_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, then any point in one of the sets has
a corresponding point at distance `< r` in the other set. -/
theorem exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ∈ s) (H : hausdorffEdist s t < r) :
∃ y ∈ t, edist x y < r :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp <|
calc
infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem h
_ < r := H
#align emetric.exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt EMetric.exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt
/-- The distance from `x` to `s` or `t` is controlled in terms of the Hausdorff distance
between `s` and `t`. -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist :
infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t :=
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => by
have ε0 : (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x s < infEdist x s + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).1.ne ε0
obtain ⟨y : α, ys : y ∈ s, dxy : edist x y < infEdist x s + ↑ε / 2⟩ := infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
have : hausdorffEdist s t < hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).2.ne ε0
obtain ⟨z : α, zt : z ∈ t, dyz : edist y z < hausdorffEdist s t + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt ys this
calc
infEdist x t ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zt
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x s + ε / 2 + (hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2) := add_le_add dxy.le dyz.le
_ = infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t + ε := by
simp [ENNReal.add_halves, add_comm, add_left_comm]
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_Hausdorff_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
/-- The Hausdorff edistance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_image (h : Isometry Φ) :
hausdorffEdist (Φ '' s) (Φ '' t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, iSup_image, infEdist_image h]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_image EMetric.hausdorffEdist_image
/-- The Hausdorff distance is controlled by the diameter of the union. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_ediam (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
hausdorffEdist s t ≤ diam (s ∪ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨y, yt⟩
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist ?_ ?_
· intro z hz
exact ⟨y, yt, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_left hz) (subset_union_right yt)⟩
· intro z hz
exact ⟨x, xs, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_right hz) (subset_union_left xs)⟩
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_ediam EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_ediam
/-- The Hausdorff distance satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_triangle : hausdorffEdist s u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
simp only [sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
constructor
· show ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xs =>
calc
infEdist x u ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs) _
· show ∀ x ∈ u, infEdist x s ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xu =>
calc
infEdist x s ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist u t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xu) _
_ = hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm, add_comm]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_triangle EMetric.hausdorffEdist_triangle
/-- Two sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they have the same closure. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ closure s = closure t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, ENNReal.sup_eq_zero, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero, ← subset_def,
← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, subset_antisymm_iff, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between a set and its closure vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self_closure : hausdorffEdist s (closure s) = 0 := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, closure_closure]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_self_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_self_closure
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₁ : hausdorffEdist (closure s) t = hausdorffEdist s t := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist (closure s) s + hausdorffEdist s t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist s t := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm]
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s (closure s) + hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := by simp
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure₁ EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure₁
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₂ : hausdorffEdist s (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp [@hausdorffEdist_comm _ _ s _]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure₂ EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure₂
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between sets or their closures is the same. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure : hausdorffEdist (closure s) (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure
/-- Two closed sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ s = t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed EMetric.hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed
/-- The Haudorff edistance to the empty set is infinite. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_empty (ne : s.Nonempty) : hausdorffEdist s ∅ = ∞ := by
rcases ne with ⟨x, xs⟩
have : infEdist x ∅ ≤ hausdorffEdist s ∅ := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs
simpa using this
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_empty EMetric.hausdorffEdist_empty
/-- If a set is at finite Hausdorff edistance of a nonempty set, it is nonempty. -/
theorem nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (hs : s.Nonempty) (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
t.Nonempty :=
t.eq_empty_or_nonempty.resolve_left fun ht ↦ fin (ht.symm ▸ hausdorffEdist_empty hs)
#align emetric.nonempty_of_Hausdorff_edist_ne_top EMetric.nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top
theorem empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
(s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅) ∨ (s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht | ht
· exact Or.inl ⟨hs, ht⟩
· rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
exact Or.inr ⟨nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top ht fin, ht⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hs, nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top hs fin⟩
#align emetric.empty_or_nonempty_of_Hausdorff_edist_ne_top EMetric.empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top
end HausdorffEdist
-- section
end EMetric
/-! Now, we turn to the same notions in metric spaces. To avoid the difficulties related to
`sInf` and `sSup` on `ℝ` (which is only conditionally complete), we use the notions in `ℝ≥0∞`
formulated in terms of the edistance, and coerce them to `ℝ`.
Then their properties follow readily from the corresponding properties in `ℝ≥0∞`,
modulo some tedious rewriting of inequalities from one to the other. -/
--namespace
namespace Metric
section
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {s t u : Set α} {x y : α} {Φ : α → β}
open EMetric
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set -/
def infDist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (infEdist x s)
#align metric.inf_dist Metric.infDist
theorem infDist_eq_iInf : infDist x s = ⨅ y : s, dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infEdist, iInf_subtype', ENNReal.toReal_iInf]
· simp only [dist_edist]
· exact fun _ ↦ edist_ne_top _ _
#align metric.inf_dist_eq_infi Metric.infDist_eq_iInf
/-- The minimal distance is always nonnegative -/
theorem infDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ infDist x s := toReal_nonneg
#align metric.inf_dist_nonneg Metric.infDist_nonneg
/-- The minimal distance to the empty set is 0 (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.infEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`) -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_empty : infDist x ∅ = 0 := by simp [infDist]
#align metric.inf_dist_empty Metric.infDist_empty
/-- In a metric space, the minimal edistance to a nonempty set is finite. -/
theorem infEdist_ne_top (h : s.Nonempty) : infEdist x s ≠ ⊤ := by
rcases h with ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy)
#align metric.inf_edist_ne_top Metric.infEdist_ne_top
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: make it a `simp` lemma
theorem infEdist_eq_top_iff : infEdist x s = ∞ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs <;> simp [*, Nonempty.ne_empty, infEdist_ne_top]
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set containing it vanishes. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [infEdist_zero_of_mem h, infDist]
#align metric.inf_dist_zero_of_mem Metric.infDist_zero_of_mem
/-- The minimal distance to a singleton is the distance to the unique point in this singleton. -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_singleton : infDist x {y} = dist x y := by simp [infDist, dist_edist]
#align metric.inf_dist_singleton Metric.infDist_singleton
/-- The minimal distance to a set is bounded by the distance to any point in this set. -/
theorem infDist_le_dist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infDist x s ≤ dist x y := by
rw [dist_edist, infDist]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h)
#align metric.inf_dist_le_dist_of_mem Metric.infDist_le_dist_of_mem
/-- The minimal distance is monotone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x t ≤ infDist x s :=
ENNReal.toReal_mono (infEdist_ne_top hs) (infEdist_anti h)
#align metric.inf_dist_le_inf_dist_of_subset Metric.infDist_le_infDist_of_subset
/-- The minimal distance to a set `s` is `< r` iff there exists a point in `s` at distance `< r`. -/
theorem infDist_lt_iff {r : ℝ} (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infDist, ← ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top hs), infEdist_lt_iff,
ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (edist_ne_top _ _), ← dist_edist]
#align metric.inf_dist_lt_iff Metric.infDist_lt_iff
/-- The minimal distance from `x` to `s` is bounded by the distance from `y` to `s`, modulo
the distance between `x` and `y`. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_add_dist : infDist x s ≤ infDist y s + dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infDist, dist_edist]
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_add' infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist ?_ (flip absurd (edist_ne_top _ _))
simp only [infEdist_eq_top_iff, imp_self]
#align metric.inf_dist_le_inf_dist_add_dist Metric.infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
theorem not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist (h : dist x y < infDist x s) : y ∉ s := fun hy =>
h.not_le <| infDist_le_dist_of_mem hy
#align metric.not_mem_of_dist_lt_inf_dist Metric.not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist
theorem disjoint_ball_infDist : Disjoint (ball x (infDist x s)) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _y hy => not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist <| mem_ball'.1 hy
#align metric.disjoint_ball_inf_dist Metric.disjoint_ball_infDist
theorem ball_infDist_subset_compl : ball x (infDist x s) ⊆ sᶜ :=
(disjoint_ball_infDist (s := s)).subset_compl_right
#align metric.ball_inf_dist_subset_compl Metric.ball_infDist_subset_compl
theorem ball_infDist_compl_subset : ball x (infDist x sᶜ) ⊆ s :=
ball_infDist_subset_compl.trans_eq (compl_compl s)
#align metric.ball_inf_dist_compl_subset Metric.ball_infDist_compl_subset
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist {r : ℝ} (h : r < infDist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s :=
disjoint_ball_infDist.mono_left <| closedBall_subset_ball h
#align metric.disjoint_closed_ball_of_lt_inf_dist Metric.disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist
theorem dist_le_infDist_add_diam (hs : IsBounded s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
dist x y ≤ infDist x s + diam s := by
rw [infDist, diam, dist_edist]
exact toReal_le_add (edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam hy) (infEdist_ne_top ⟨y, hy⟩) hs.ediam_ne_top
#align metric.dist_le_inf_dist_add_diam Metric.dist_le_infDist_add_diam
variable (s)
/-- The minimal distance to a set is Lipschitz in point with constant 1 -/
theorem lipschitz_infDist_pt : LipschitzWith 1 (infDist · s) :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
#align metric.lipschitz_inf_dist_pt Metric.lipschitz_infDist_pt
/-- The minimal distance to a set is uniformly continuous in point -/
theorem uniformContinuous_infDist_pt : UniformContinuous (infDist · s) :=
(lipschitz_infDist_pt s).uniformContinuous
#align metric.uniform_continuous_inf_dist_pt Metric.uniformContinuous_infDist_pt
/-- The minimal distance to a set is continuous in point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infDist_pt : Continuous (infDist · s) :=
(uniformContinuous_infDist_pt s).continuous
#align metric.continuous_inf_dist_pt Metric.continuous_infDist_pt
variable {s}
/-- The minimal distances to a set and its closure coincide. -/
theorem infDist_closure : infDist x (closure s) = infDist x s := by
simp [infDist, infEdist_closure]
#align metric.inf_dist_eq_closure Metric.infDist_closure
/-- If a point belongs to the closure of `s`, then its infimum distance to `s` equals zero.
The converse is true provided that `s` is nonempty, see `Metric.mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero`. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem_closure (hx : x ∈ closure s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
rw [← infDist_closure]
exact infDist_zero_of_mem hx
#align metric.inf_dist_zero_of_mem_closure Metric.infDist_zero_of_mem_closure
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero (h : s.Nonempty) : x ∈ closure s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, infDist, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, infEdist_ne_top h]
#align metric.mem_closure_iff_inf_dist_zero Metric.mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.mem_iff_infDist_zero (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∈ s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by rw [← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs, h.closure_eq]
#align is_closed.mem_iff_inf_dist_zero IsClosed.mem_iff_infDist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∉ s ↔ 0 < infDist x s := by
simp [h.mem_iff_infDist_zero hs, infDist_nonneg.gt_iff_ne]
#align is_closed.not_mem_iff_inf_dist_pos IsClosed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem continuousAt_inv_infDist_pt (h : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ (infDist x s)⁻¹) x := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp only [infDist_empty, continuousAt_const]
· refine (continuous_infDist_pt s).continuousAt.inv₀ ?_
rwa [Ne, ← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs]
/-- The infimum distance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem infDist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infDist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infDist x t := by
simp [infDist, infEdist_image hΦ]
#align metric.inf_dist_image Metric.infDist_image
theorem infDist_inter_closedBall_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) :
infDist x (s ∩ closedBall x (dist y x)) = infDist x s := by
replace h : y ∈ s ∩ closedBall x (dist y x) := ⟨h, mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (infDist_le_infDist_of_subset inter_subset_left ⟨y, h⟩)
refine not_lt.1 fun hlt => ?_
rcases (infDist_lt_iff ⟨y, h.1⟩).mp hlt with ⟨z, hzs, hz⟩
rcases le_or_lt (dist z x) (dist y x) with hle | hlt
· exact hz.not_le (infDist_le_dist_of_mem ⟨hzs, hle⟩)
· rw [dist_comm z, dist_comm y] at hlt
exact (hlt.trans hz).not_le (infDist_le_dist_of_mem h)
#align metric.inf_dist_inter_closed_ball_of_mem Metric.infDist_inter_closedBall_of_mem
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infDist_eq_dist (h : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infDist x s = dist x y :=
let ⟨y, hys, hy⟩ := h.exists_infEdist_eq_edist hne x
⟨y, hys, by rw [infDist, dist_edist, hy]⟩
#align is_compact.exists_inf_dist_eq_dist IsCompact.exists_infDist_eq_dist
theorem _root_.IsClosed.exists_infDist_eq_dist [ProperSpace α] (h : IsClosed s) (hne : s.Nonempty)
(x : α) : ∃ y ∈ s, infDist x s = dist x y := by
rcases hne with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [← infDist_inter_closedBall_of_mem hz]
set t := s ∩ closedBall x (dist z x)
have htc : IsCompact t := (isCompact_closedBall x (dist z x)).inter_left h
have htne : t.Nonempty := ⟨z, hz, mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, ⟨hys, -⟩, hyd⟩ : ∃ y ∈ t, infDist x t = dist x y := htc.exists_infDist_eq_dist htne x
exact ⟨y, hys, hyd⟩
#align is_closed.exists_inf_dist_eq_dist IsClosed.exists_infDist_eq_dist
theorem exists_mem_closure_infDist_eq_dist [ProperSpace α] (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ closure s, infDist x s = dist x y := by
simpa only [infDist_closure] using isClosed_closure.exists_infDist_eq_dist hne.closure x
#align metric.exists_mem_closure_inf_dist_eq_dist Metric.exists_mem_closure_infDist_eq_dist
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set as a `ℝ≥0` -/
def infNndist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0 :=
ENNReal.toNNReal (infEdist x s)
#align metric.inf_nndist Metric.infNndist
@[simp]
theorem coe_infNndist : (infNndist x s : ℝ) = infDist x s :=
rfl
#align metric.coe_inf_nndist Metric.coe_infNndist
/-- The minimal distance to a set (as `ℝ≥0`) is Lipschitz in point with constant 1 -/
theorem lipschitz_infNndist_pt (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith 1 fun x => infNndist x s :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
#align metric.lipschitz_inf_nndist_pt Metric.lipschitz_infNndist_pt
/-- The minimal distance to a set (as `ℝ≥0`) is uniformly continuous in point -/
theorem uniformContinuous_infNndist_pt (s : Set α) : UniformContinuous fun x => infNndist x s :=
(lipschitz_infNndist_pt s).uniformContinuous
#align metric.uniform_continuous_inf_nndist_pt Metric.uniformContinuous_infNndist_pt
/-- The minimal distance to a set (as `ℝ≥0`) is continuous in point -/
theorem continuous_infNndist_pt (s : Set α) : Continuous fun x => infNndist x s :=
(uniformContinuous_infNndist_pt s).continuous
#align metric.continuous_inf_nndist_pt Metric.continuous_infNndist_pt
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff distance between two sets is the smallest nonnegative `r` such that each set is
included in the `r`-neighborhood of the other. If there is no such `r`, it is defined to
be `0`, arbitrarily. -/
def hausdorffDist (s t : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (hausdorffEdist s t)
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist Metric.hausdorffDist
/-- The Hausdorff distance is nonnegative. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ hausdorffDist s t := by simp [hausdorffDist]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_nonneg Metric.hausdorffDist_nonneg
/-- If two sets are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff
edistance. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(bs : IsBounded s) (bt : IsBounded t) : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤ := by
rcases hs with ⟨cs, hcs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨ct, hct⟩
rcases bs.subset_closedBall ct with ⟨rs, hrs⟩
rcases bt.subset_closedBall cs with ⟨rt, hrt⟩
have : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (max rs rt) := by
apply hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist
· intro x xs
exists ct, hct
have : dist x ct ≤ max rs rt := le_trans (hrs xs) (le_max_left _ _)
rwa [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff]
exact le_trans dist_nonneg this
· intro x xt
exists cs, hcs
have : dist x cs ≤ max rs rt := le_trans (hrt xt) (le_max_right _ _)
rwa [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff]
exact le_trans dist_nonneg this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top this
#align metric.Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded Metric.hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded
/-- The Hausdorff distance between a set and itself is zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_self_zero : hausdorffDist s s = 0 := by simp [hausdorffDist]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_self_zero Metric.hausdorffDist_self_zero
/-- The Hausdorff distances from `s` to `t` and from `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_comm : hausdorffDist s t = hausdorffDist t s := by
simp [hausdorffDist, hausdorffEdist_comm]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_comm Metric.hausdorffDist_comm
/-- The Hausdorff distance to the empty set vanishes (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.hausdorffEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`). -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_empty : hausdorffDist s ∅ = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hausdorffDist, hausdorffEdist_empty h]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_empty Metric.hausdorffDist_empty
/-- The Hausdorff distance to the empty set vanishes (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.hausdorffEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`). -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_empty' : hausdorffDist ∅ s = 0 := by simp [hausdorffDist_comm]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_empty' Metric.hausdorffDist_empty'
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff distance by bounding the distance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffDist_le_of_infDist {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infDist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infDist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffDist s t ≤ r := by
by_cases h1 : hausdorffEdist s t = ⊤
· rwa [hausdorffDist, h1, ENNReal.top_toReal]
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rwa [hs, hausdorffDist_empty']
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht | ht
· rwa [ht, hausdorffDist_empty]
have : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r := by
apply hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist _ _
· intro x hx
have I := H1 x hx
rwa [infDist, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hr,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (infEdist_ne_top ht) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top] at I
· intro x hx
have I := H2 x hx
rwa [infDist, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hr,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (infEdist_ne_top hs) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top] at I
rwa [hausdorffDist, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hr,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal h1 ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_le_of_inf_dist Metric.hausdorffDist_le_of_infDist
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff distance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffDist_le_of_mem_dist {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, dist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffDist s t ≤ r := by
apply hausdorffDist_le_of_infDist hr
· intro x xs
rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infDist_le_dist_of_mem yt) hy
· intro x xt
rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infDist_le_dist_of_mem ys) hy
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist Metric.hausdorffDist_le_of_mem_dist
/-- The Hausdorff distance is controlled by the diameter of the union. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_le_diam (hs : s.Nonempty) (bs : IsBounded s) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(bt : IsBounded t) : hausdorffDist s t ≤ diam (s ∪ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨y, yt⟩
refine hausdorffDist_le_of_mem_dist diam_nonneg ?_ ?_
· exact fun z hz => ⟨y, yt, dist_le_diam_of_mem (bs.union bt) (subset_union_left hz)
(subset_union_right yt)⟩
· exact fun z hz => ⟨x, xs, dist_le_diam_of_mem (bs.union bt) (subset_union_right hz)
(subset_union_left xs)⟩
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_le_diam Metric.hausdorffDist_le_diam
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
theorem infDist_le_hausdorffDist_of_mem (hx : x ∈ s) (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
infDist x t ≤ hausdorffDist s t :=
toReal_mono fin (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem hx)
#align metric.inf_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist_of_mem Metric.infDist_le_hausdorffDist_of_mem
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, any point in one of the sets is at distance
`< r` of a point in the other set. -/
theorem exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt {r : ℝ} (h : x ∈ s) (H : hausdorffDist s t < r)
(fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) : ∃ y ∈ t, dist x y < r := by
have r0 : 0 < r := lt_of_le_of_lt hausdorffDist_nonneg H
have : hausdorffEdist s t < ENNReal.ofReal r := by
rwa [hausdorffDist, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (le_of_lt r0),
ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal fin ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top] at H
rcases exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt h this with ⟨y, hy, yr⟩
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff r0] at yr
exact ⟨y, hy, yr⟩
#align metric.exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt Metric.exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, any point in one of the sets is at distance
`< r` of a point in the other set. -/
theorem exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt' {r : ℝ} (h : y ∈ t) (H : hausdorffDist s t < r)
(fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) : ∃ x ∈ s, dist x y < r := by
rw [hausdorffDist_comm] at H
rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
simpa [dist_comm] using exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt h H fin
#align metric.exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt' Metric.exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt'
/-- The infimum distance to `s` and `t` are the same, up to the Hausdorff distance
between `s` and `t` -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_add_hausdorffDist (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
infDist x t ≤ infDist x s + hausdorffDist s t := by
refine toReal_le_add' infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist (fun h ↦ ?_) (flip absurd fin)
rw [infEdist_eq_top_iff, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at h ⊢
rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
exact mt (nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top · fin) h
#align metric.inf_dist_le_inf_dist_add_Hausdorff_dist Metric.infDist_le_infDist_add_hausdorffDist
/-- The Hausdorff distance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_image (h : Isometry Φ) :
hausdorffDist (Φ '' s) (Φ '' t) = hausdorffDist s t := by
simp [hausdorffDist, hausdorffEdist_image h]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_image Metric.hausdorffDist_image
/-- The Hausdorff distance satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_triangle (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
hausdorffDist s u ≤ hausdorffDist s t + hausdorffDist t u := by
refine toReal_le_add' hausdorffEdist_triangle (flip absurd fin) (not_imp_not.1 fun h ↦ ?_)
rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (add_ne_top.2 ⟨fin, h⟩) hausdorffEdist_triangle
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_triangle Metric.hausdorffDist_triangle
/-- The Hausdorff distance satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_triangle' (fin : hausdorffEdist t u ≠ ⊤) :
hausdorffDist s u ≤ hausdorffDist s t + hausdorffDist t u := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
have I : hausdorffDist u s ≤ hausdorffDist u t + hausdorffDist t s :=
hausdorffDist_triangle fin
simpa [add_comm, hausdorffDist_comm] using I
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_triangle' Metric.hausdorffDist_triangle'
/-- The Hausdorff distance between a set and its closure vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_self_closure : hausdorffDist s (closure s) = 0 := by simp [hausdorffDist]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_self_closure Metric.hausdorffDist_self_closure
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff distance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_closure₁ : hausdorffDist (closure s) t = hausdorffDist s t := by
simp [hausdorffDist]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_closure₁ Metric.hausdorffDist_closure₁
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff distance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_closure₂ : hausdorffDist s (closure t) = hausdorffDist s t := by
simp [hausdorffDist]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_closure₂ Metric.hausdorffDist_closure₂
/-- The Hausdorff distances between two sets and their closures coincide. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem hausdorffDist_closure : hausdorffDist (closure s) (closure t) = hausdorffDist s t := by
simp [hausdorffDist]
#align metric.Hausdorff_dist_closure Metric.hausdorffDist_closure
/-- Two sets are at zero Hausdorff distance if and only if they have the same closures. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 894 | 897 | theorem hausdorffDist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
hausdorffDist s t = 0 ↔ closure s = closure t := by |
simp [← hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, hausdorffDist,
ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, fin]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.intervals.pi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e4bc74cbaf429d706cb9140902f7ca6c431e75a4"
/-!
# Intervals in `pi`-space
In this we prove various simple lemmas about intervals in `Π i, α i`. Closed intervals (`Ici x`,
`Iic x`, `Icc x y`) are equal to products of their projections to `α i`, while (semi-)open intervals
usually include the corresponding products as proper subsets.
-/
-- Porting note: Added, since dot notation no longer works on `Function.update`
open Function
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace Set
section PiPreorder
variable [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (x y : ∀ i, α i)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Ici : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ici (x i)) = Ici x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
#align set.pi_univ_Ici Set.pi_univ_Ici
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Iic : (pi univ fun i ↦ Iic (x i)) = Iic x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
#align set.pi_univ_Iic Set.pi_univ_Iic
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Icc : (pi univ fun i ↦ Icc (x i) (y i)) = Icc x y :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def, forall_and]
#align set.pi_univ_Icc Set.pi_univ_Icc
theorem piecewise_mem_Icc {s : Set ι} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, α i}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f₁ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) (h₂ : ∀ i ∉ s, f₂ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) :
s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂ :=
⟨le_piecewise (fun i hi ↦ (h₁ i hi).1) fun i hi ↦ (h₂ i hi).1,
piecewise_le (fun i hi ↦ (h₁ i hi).2) fun i hi ↦ (h₂ i hi).2⟩
#align set.piecewise_mem_Icc Set.piecewise_mem_Icc
theorem piecewise_mem_Icc' {s : Set ι} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, α i}
(h₁ : f₁ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂) (h₂ : f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂) : s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂ :=
piecewise_mem_Icc (fun _ _ ↦ ⟨h₁.1 _, h₁.2 _⟩) fun _ _ ↦ ⟨h₂.1 _, h₂.2 _⟩
#align set.piecewise_mem_Icc' Set.piecewise_mem_Icc'
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem pi_univ_Ioi_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioi (x i)) ⊆ Ioi x := fun z hz ↦
⟨fun i ↦ le_of_lt <| hz i trivial, fun h ↦
(Nonempty.elim ‹Nonempty ι›) fun i ↦ not_lt_of_le (h i) (hz i trivial)⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ioi_subset Set.pi_univ_Ioi_subset
theorem pi_univ_Iio_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)) ⊆ Iio x :=
@pi_univ_Ioi_subset ι (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x _
#align set.pi_univ_Iio_subset Set.pi_univ_Iio_subset
theorem pi_univ_Ioo_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioo (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ioo x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨(pi_univ_Ioi_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).1, (pi_univ_Iio_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).2⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ioo_subset Set.pi_univ_Ioo_subset
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ioc x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨(pi_univ_Ioi_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).1, fun i ↦ (hx i trivial).2⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ioc_subset Set.pi_univ_Ioc_subset
theorem pi_univ_Ico_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ico (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ico x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨fun i ↦ (hx i trivial).1, (pi_univ_Iio_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).2⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ico_subset Set.pi_univ_Ico_subset
end Nonempty
variable [DecidableEq ι]
open Function (update)
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_update_left {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} (hm : x i₀ ≤ m) :
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (update x i₀ m i) (y i)) =
{ z | m < z i₀ } ∩ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i) := by
have : Ioc m (y i₀) = Ioi m ∩ Ioc (x i₀) (y i₀) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_assoc,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Ioi_subset_Ioi hm)]
simp_rw [univ_pi_update i₀ _ _ fun i z ↦ Ioc z (y i), ← pi_inter_compl ({i₀} : Set ι),
singleton_pi', ← inter_assoc, this]
rfl
#align set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_left Set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_left
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_update_right {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} (hm : m ≤ y i₀) :
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (update y i₀ m i)) =
{ z | z i₀ ≤ m } ∩ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i) := by
have : Ioc (x i₀) m = Iic m ∩ Ioc (x i₀) (y i₀) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_left_comm,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hm)]
simp_rw [univ_pi_update i₀ y m fun i z ↦ Ioc (x i) z, ← pi_inter_compl ({i₀} : Set ι),
singleton_pi', ← inter_assoc, this]
rfl
#align set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_right Set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_right
theorem disjoint_pi_univ_Ioc_update_left_right {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} :
Disjoint (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (update y i₀ m i))
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (update x i₀ m i) (y i)) := by
rw [disjoint_left]
rintro z h₁ h₂
refine (h₁ i₀ (mem_univ _)).2.not_lt ?_
simpa only [Function.update_same] using (h₂ i₀ (mem_univ _)).1
#align set.disjoint_pi_univ_Ioc_update_left_right Set.disjoint_pi_univ_Ioc_update_left_right
end PiPreorder
section PiPartialOrder
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, PartialOrder (α i)]
-- Porting note: Dot notation on `Function.update` broke
theorem image_update_Icc (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Icc a b = Icc (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
ext x
rw [← Set.pi_univ_Icc]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨x i, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
simpa [update_le_update_iff]
· simpa only [Function.update_same] using h i (mem_univ i)
· ext j
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· exact Function.update_same _ _ _
· simpa only [Function.update_noteq hij.symm, le_antisymm_iff] using h j (mem_univ j)
#align set.image_update_Icc Set.image_update_Icc
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Pi.lean | 142 | 145 | theorem image_update_Ico (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Ico a b = Ico (update f i a) (update f i b) := by |
rw [← Icc_diff_right, ← Icc_diff_right, image_diff (update_injective _ _), image_singleton,
image_update_Icc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.prod.integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Integration with respect to the product measure
In this file we prove Fubini's theorem.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.integrable_prod_iff` states that a binary function is integrable iff both
* `y ↦ f (x, y)` is integrable for almost every `x`, and
* the function `x ↦ ∫ ‖f (x, y)‖ dy` is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.integral_prod`: Fubini's theorem. It states that for an integrable function
`α × β → E` (where `E` is a second countable Banach space) we have
`∫ z, f z ∂(μ.prod ν) = ∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂ν ∂μ`. This theorem has the same variants as
Tonelli's theorem (see `MeasureTheory.lintegral_prod`). The lemma
`MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_prod_right` states that the inner integral of the right-hand
side is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.integral_integral_swap_of_hasCompactSupport`: a version of Fubini theorem for
continuous functions with compact support, which does not assume that the measures are σ-finite
contrary to all the usual versions of Fubini.
## Tags
product measure, Fubini's theorem, Fubini-Tonelli theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open TopologicalSpace
open Filter hiding prod_eq map
variable {α α' β β' γ E : Type*}
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α'] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β']
variable [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ' : Measure α} {ν ν' : Measure β} {τ : Measure γ}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-! ### Measurability
Before we define the product measure, we can talk about the measurability of operations on binary
functions. We show that if `f` is a binary measurable function, then the function that integrates
along one of the variables (using either the Lebesgue or Bochner integral) is measurable.
-/
theorem measurableSet_integrable [SigmaFinite ν] ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : MeasurableSet {x | Integrable (f x) ν} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.of_uncurry_left.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and_iff]
exact measurableSet_lt (Measurable.lintegral_prod_right hf.ennnorm) measurable_const
#align measurable_set_integrable measurableSet_integrable
section
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
Fubini's theorem is measurable.
This version has `f` in curried form. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right [SigmaFinite ν] ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f x y ∂ν := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap; · simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
haveI : SeparableSpace (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc (α × β) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let s' : ℕ → α → SimpleFunc β E := fun n x => (s n).comp (Prod.mk x) measurable_prod_mk_left
let f' : ℕ → α → E := fun n => {x | Integrable (f x) ν}.indicator fun x => (s' n x).integral ν
have hf' : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f' n) := by
intro n; refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_integrable hf)
have : ∀ x, ((s' n x).range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ (s n).range := by
intro x; refine Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.filter_subset _ _) ?_; intro y
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range]; rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩; exact ⟨(x, z), rfl⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset (this _)]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun x _ => ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
simp only [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp, preimage_comp]
apply measurable_measure_prod_mk_left
exact (s n).measurableSet_fiber x
have h2f' : Tendsto f' atTop (𝓝 fun x : α => ∫ y : β, f x y ∂ν) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable (f x) ν
· have (n) : Integrable (s' n x) ν := by
apply (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm).mono' (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simp_rw [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp]; exact SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
simp only [f', hfx, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (this _), indicator_of_mem,
mem_setOf_eq]
refine
tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun y => ‖f x y‖ + ‖f x y‖)
(fun n => (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable) (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm) ?_ ?_
· refine fun n => eventually_of_forall fun y =>
SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le ?_ ?_ (x, y) n
-- Porting note: Lean 3 solved the following two subgoals on its own
· exact hf.measurable
· simp
· refine eventually_of_forall fun y => SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn ?_ ?_ ?_
-- Porting note: Lean 3 solved the following two subgoals on its own
· exact hf.measurable.of_uncurry_left
· simp
apply subset_closure
simp [-uncurry_apply_pair]
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
exact stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ hf' h2f'
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_right MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
Fubini's theorem is measurable. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right' [SigmaFinite ν] ⦃f : α × β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂ν := by
rw [← uncurry_curry f] at hf; exact hf.integral_prod_right
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_right' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right'
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
the symmetric version of Fubini's theorem is measurable.
This version has `f` in curried form. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left [SigmaFinite μ] ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f x y ∂μ :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_prod_right'
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_left MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left
/-- The Bochner integral is measurable. This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of)
the symmetric version of Fubini's theorem is measurable. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left' [SigmaFinite μ] ⦃f : α × β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂μ :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_prod_right'
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.integral_prod_left' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_left'
end
/-! ### The product measure -/
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
variable [SigmaFinite ν]
theorem integrable_measure_prod_mk_left {s : Set (α × β)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (μ.prod ν) s ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun x => (ν (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s)).toReal) μ := by
refine ⟨(measurable_measure_prod_mk_left hs).ennreal_toReal.aemeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg]
convert h2s.lt_top using 1
-- Porting note: was `simp_rw`
rw [prod_apply hs]
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [ae_measure_lt_top hs h2s] with x hx
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top] at hx; simp [ofReal_toReal, hx]
#align measure_theory.measure.integrable_measure_prod_mk_left MeasureTheory.Measure.integrable_measure_prod_mk_left
end Measure
open Measure
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory.Measure
section
nonrec theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.prod_swap {γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace γ]
[SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] {f : β × α → γ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (ν.prod μ)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.swap) (μ.prod ν) := by
rw [← prod_swap] at hf
exact hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.prod_swap MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.prod_swap
theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fst {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] [SigmaFinite ν] {f : α → γ}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.1) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving quasiMeasurePreserving_fst
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.fst MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fst
theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.snd {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] [SigmaFinite ν] {f : β → γ}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν) : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.2) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving quasiMeasurePreserving_snd
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.snd MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.snd
/-- The Bochner integral is a.e.-measurable.
This shows that the integrand of (the right-hand-side of) Fubini's theorem is a.e.-measurable. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right' [SigmaFinite ν] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.prod ν)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂ν) μ :=
⟨fun x => ∫ y, hf.mk f (x, y) ∂ν, hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.integral_prod_right', by
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_prod hf.ae_eq_mk] with _ hx using integral_congr_ae hx⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.integral_prod_right' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_prod_right'
theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.prod_mk_left {γ : Type*} [SigmaFinite ν]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {f : α × β → γ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.prod ν)) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y => f (x, y)) ν := by
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_prod hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
exact
⟨fun y => hf.mk f (x, y), hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left, hx⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.prod_mk_left MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.prod_mk_left
end
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [SigmaFinite ν]
/-! ### Integrability on a product -/
section
theorem integrable_swap_iff [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α × β → E} :
Integrable (f ∘ Prod.swap) (ν.prod μ) ↔ Integrable f (μ.prod ν) :=
measurePreserving_swap.integrable_comp_emb MeasurableEquiv.prodComm.measurableEmbedding
#align measure_theory.integrable_swap_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_swap_iff
theorem Integrable.swap [SigmaFinite μ] ⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (hf : Integrable f (μ.prod ν)) :
Integrable (f ∘ Prod.swap) (ν.prod μ) :=
integrable_swap_iff.2 hf
#align measure_theory.integrable.swap MeasureTheory.Integrable.swap
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_prod_iff ⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (h1f : StronglyMeasurable f) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.prod ν) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, HasFiniteIntegral (fun y => f (x, y)) ν) ∧
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂ν) μ := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_prod_of_measurable _ h1f.ennnorm]
have (x) : ∀ᵐ y ∂ν, 0 ≤ ‖f (x, y)‖ := by filter_upwards with y using norm_nonneg _
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (this _)
(h1f.norm.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left).aestronglyMeasurable,
ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
-- this fact is probably too specialized to be its own lemma
have : ∀ {p q r : Prop} (_ : r → p), (r ↔ p ∧ q) ↔ p → (r ↔ q) := fun {p q r} h1 => by
rw [← and_congr_right_iff, and_iff_right_of_imp h1]
rw [this]
· intro h2f; rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
filter_upwards [h2f] with x hx
rw [ofReal_toReal]; rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]; exact hx
· intro h2f; refine ae_lt_top ?_ h2f.ne; exact h1f.ennnorm.lintegral_prod_right'
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_prod_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_prod_iff
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Prod/Integral.lean | 253 | 266 | theorem hasFiniteIntegral_prod_iff' ⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (h1f : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.prod ν)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.prod ν) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, HasFiniteIntegral (fun y => f (x, y)) ν) ∧
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂ν) μ := by |
rw [hasFiniteIntegral_congr h1f.ae_eq_mk,
hasFiniteIntegral_prod_iff h1f.stronglyMeasurable_mk]
apply and_congr
· apply eventually_congr
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_prod h1f.ae_eq_mk.symm]
intro x hx
exact hasFiniteIntegral_congr hx
· apply hasFiniteIntegral_congr
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_prod h1f.ae_eq_mk.symm] with _ hx using
integral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hx _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Init.ZeroOne
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
#align_import data.set.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"001ffdc42920050657fd45bd2b8bfbec8eaaeb29"
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `Set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the core library.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the core
library, as well as extra lemmas for functions in the core library (empty set, univ, union,
intersection, insert, singleton, set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `Set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `SetTheory/ZFC.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : Set α` and `s₁ s₂ : Set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : Set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `Nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.Nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.Nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : Set α`, do not use `Subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open Function
universe u v w x
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebraSet : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align set.top_eq_univ Set.top_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.bot_eq_empty Set.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.sup_eq_union Set.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.inf_eq_inter Set.inf_eq_inter
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.le_eq_subset Set.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.lt_eq_ssubset Set.lt_eq_ssubset
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.le_iff_subset Set.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.lt_iff_ssubset Set.lt_iff_ssubset
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.le HasSubset.Subset.le
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
#align has_ssubset.ssubset.lt HasSSubset.SSubset.lt
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift Set.PiSetCoe.canLift
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift' Set.PiSetCoe.canLift'
end Set
section SetCoe
variable {α : Type u}
instance (s : Set α) : CoeTC s α := ⟨fun x => x.1⟩
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype (s : Set α) : ↥s = { x // x ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align set.coe_eq_subtype Set.coe_eq_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Set.coe_setOf (p : α → Prop) : ↥{ x | p x } = { x // p x } :=
rfl
#align set.coe_set_of Set.coe_setOf
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem SetCoe.forall {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} : (∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align set_coe.forall SetCoe.forall
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem SetCoe.exists {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align set_coe.exists SetCoe.exists
theorem SetCoe.exists' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∃ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.exists _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
#align set_coe.exists' SetCoe.exists'
theorem SetCoe.forall' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∀ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.forall _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
#align set_coe.forall' SetCoe.forall'
@[simp]
theorem set_coe_cast :
∀ {s t : Set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s), cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| _, _, rfl, _, _ => rfl
#align set_coe_cast set_coe_cast
theorem SetCoe.ext {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (a : α) = b → a = b :=
Subtype.eq
#align set_coe.ext SetCoe.ext
theorem SetCoe.ext_iff {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro SetCoe.ext fun h => h ▸ rfl
#align set_coe.ext_iff SetCoe.ext_iff
end SetCoe
/-- See also `Subtype.prop` -/
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
#align subtype.mem Subtype.mem
/-- Duplicate of `Eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
#align eq.subset Eq.subset
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
theorem ext_iff {s t : Set α} : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h x => by rw [h], ext⟩
#align set.ext_iff Set.ext_iff
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
#align set.mem_of_mem_of_subset Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
#align set.forall_in_swap Set.forall_in_swap
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `setOf` -/
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_set_of Set.mem_setOf
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
#align has_mem.mem.out Membership.mem.out
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nmem_set_of_iff Set.nmem_setOf_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_mem_eq Set.setOf_mem_eq
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_set Set.setOf_set
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_app_iff Set.setOf_app_iff
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_def Set.mem_def
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
#align set.set_of_bijective Set.setOf_bijective
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_subset_set_of Set.setOf_subset_setOf
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_and Set.setOf_and
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_or Set.setOf_or
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
#align set.subset_def Set.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
#align set.ssubset_def Set.ssubset_def
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
#align set.subset.refl Set.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
#align set.subset.rfl Set.Subset.rfl
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
#align set.subset.trans Set.Subset.trans
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
#align set.mem_of_eq_of_mem Set.mem_of_eq_of_mem
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm Set.Subset.antisymm
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm_iff Set.Subset.antisymm_iff
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
#align set.eq_of_subset_of_subset Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
#align set.mem_of_subset_of_mem Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
#align set.not_mem_subset Set.not_mem_subset
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align set.not_subset Set.not_subset
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
#align set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset Set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
#align set.exists_of_ssubset Set.exists_of_ssubset
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
#align set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
#align set.ssubset_iff_of_subset Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
#align set.not_mem_empty Set.not_mem_empty
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_not_mem Set.not_not_mem
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
-- Porting note: we seem to need parentheses at `(↥s)`,
-- even if we increase the right precedence of `↥` in `Mathlib.Tactic.Coe`.
-- Porting note: removed `simp` as it is competing with `nonempty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty (↥s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align set.nonempty_coe_sort Set.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align set.nonempty.coe_sort Set.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nonempty_def Set.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_mem Set.nonempty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
#align set.nonempty.not_subset_empty Set.Nonempty.not_subset_empty
/-- Extract a witness from `s.Nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `Classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
#align set.nonempty.some Set.Nonempty.some
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
#align set.nonempty.some_mem Set.Nonempty.some_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
#align set.nonempty.mono Set.Nonempty.mono
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_not_subset Set.nonempty_of_not_subset
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset Set.nonempty_of_ssubset
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.of_diff Set.Nonempty.of_diff
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset' Set.nonempty_of_ssubset'
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.nonempty.inl Set.Nonempty.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.nonempty.inr Set.Nonempty.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
#align set.union_nonempty Set.union_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.left Set.Nonempty.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
#align set.nonempty.right Set.Nonempty.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.inter_nonempty Set.inter_nonempty
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty Set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.univ_nonempty Set.univ_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
#align set.nonempty.to_subtype Set.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align set.nonempty.to_type Set.Nonempty.to_type
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
#align set.univ.nonempty Set.univ.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
#align set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype Set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
#align set.empty_def Set.empty_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_empty_iff_false Set.mem_empty_iff_false
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_false Set.setOf_false
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
#align set.empty_subset Set.empty_subset
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
#align set.subset_empty_iff Set.subset_empty_iff
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
#align set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
#align set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
#align set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty Set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
#align set.eq_empty_of_is_empty Set.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
#align set.unique_empty Set.uniqueEmpty
/-- See also `Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
/-- See also `Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
#align set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
/-- See also `nonempty_iff_ne_empty'`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.ne_empty Set.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
#align set.not_nonempty_empty Set.not_nonempty_empty
-- Porting note: removing `@[simp]` as it is competing with `isEmpty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.is_empty_coe_sort Set.isEmpty_coe_sort
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
#align set.eq_empty_or_nonempty Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
#align set.subset_eq_empty Set.subset_eq_empty
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
#align set.ball_empty_iff Set.forall_mem_empty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_empty_iff := forall_mem_empty
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.empty_ssubset Set.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align set.nonempty.empty_ssubset Set.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : Set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_true Set.setOf_true
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
#align set.univ_eq_empty_iff Set.univ_eq_empty_iff
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
#align set.empty_ne_univ Set.empty_ne_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.subset_univ Set.subset_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
#align set.univ_subset_iff Set.univ_subset_iff
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
#align set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset Set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
#align set.eq_univ_iff_forall Set.eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
#align set.eq_univ_of_forall Set.eq_univ_of_forall
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
#align set.nonempty.eq_univ Set.Nonempty.eq_univ
theorem eq_univ_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| (hs ▸ h : univ ⊆ t)
#align set.eq_univ_of_subset Set.eq_univ_of_subset
theorem exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [Nonempty α], ∃ x : α, x ∈ (univ : Set α)
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.exists_mem_of_nonempty Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty
theorem ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : Set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
rw [← not_forall, ← eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem Set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem
theorem not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} :
¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem Set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : @Set.univ α = {default} :=
Set.ext fun x => iff_of_true trivial <| Subsingleton.elim x default
#align set.univ_unique Set.univ_unique
theorem ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top
#align set.ssubset_univ_iff Set.ssubset_univ_iff
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Set α) :=
⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
#align set.nontrivial_of_nonempty Set.nontrivial_of_nonempty
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.union_def Set.union_def
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : Set α} (b : Set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inl
#align set.mem_union_left Set.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : Set α} (a : Set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_union_right Set.mem_union_right
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : Set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
H
#align set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union Set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union
theorem MemUnion.elim {x : α} {a b : Set α} {P : Prop} (H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P)
(H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
Or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
#align set.mem_union.elim Set.MemUnion.elim
@[simp]
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_union Set.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem union_self (a : Set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => or_self_iff
#align set.union_self Set.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (a : Set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext fun _ => or_false_iff _
#align set.union_empty Set.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (a : Set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => false_or_iff _
#align set.empty_union Set.empty_union
theorem union_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext fun _ => or_comm
#align set.union_comm Set.union_comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∪ b ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.union_assoc Set.union_assoc
instance union_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
#align set.union_is_assoc Set.union_isAssoc
instance union_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
#align set.union_is_comm Set.union_isComm
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_left_comm Set.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => or_right_comm
#align set.union_right_comm Set.union_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_left {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
#align set.union_eq_left_iff_subset Set.union_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_right {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
#align set.union_eq_right_iff_subset Set.union_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.subset_union_left Set.subset_union_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_union_right Set.subset_union_right
theorem union_subset {s t r : Set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r := fun _ =>
Or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
#align set.union_subset Set.union_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => or_imp).trans forall_and
#align set.union_subset_iff Set.union_subset_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := fun _ => Or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.union_subset_union Set.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align set.union_subset_union_left Set.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align set.union_subset_union_right Set.union_subset_union_right
theorem subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_left
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_left Set.subset_union_of_subset_left
theorem subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : Set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_right
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_right Set.subset_union_of_subset_right
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align set.union_congr_left Set.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align set.union_congr_right Set.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_left Set.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_right Set.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem union_empty_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := by
simp only [← subset_empty_iff]
exact union_subset_iff
#align set.union_empty_iff Set.union_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_univ (s : Set α) : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq _
#align set.union_univ Set.union_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_union (s : Set α) : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq _
#align set.univ_union Set.univ_union
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.inter_def Set.inter_def
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_inter_iff Set.mem_inter_iff
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : Set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.mem_inter Set.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_left Set.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_right Set.mem_of_mem_inter_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (a : Set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext fun _ => and_self_iff
#align set.inter_self Set.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (a : Set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => and_false_iff _
#align set.inter_empty Set.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (a : Set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_inter Set.empty_inter
theorem inter_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.inter_comm Set.inter_comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
#align set.inter_assoc Set.inter_assoc
instance inter_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
#align set.inter_is_assoc Set.inter_isAssoc
instance inter_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
#align set.inter_is_comm Set.inter_isComm
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => and_left_comm
#align set.inter_left_comm Set.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => and_right_comm
#align set.inter_right_comm Set.inter_right_comm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
#align set.inter_subset_left Set.inter_subset_left
@[simp]
theorem inter_subset_right {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ t := fun _ => And.right
#align set.inter_subset_right Set.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : Set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := fun _ h =>
⟨rs h, rt h⟩
#align set.subset_inter Set.subset_inter
@[simp]
theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : Set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_and).trans forall_and
#align set.subset_inter_iff Set.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align set.inter_eq_left_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s := inf_eq_right
#align set.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_right
@[simp] lemma left_eq_inter : s = s ∩ t ↔ s ⊆ t := left_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma right_eq_inter : t = s ∩ t ↔ t ⊆ s := right_eq_inf
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align set.inter_congr_left Set.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align set.inter_congr_right Set.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_univ (a : Set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq _
#align set.inter_univ Set.inter_univ
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_inter (a : Set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq _
#align set.univ_inter Set.univ_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := fun _ => And.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.inter_subset_inter Set.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H Subset.rfl
#align set.inter_subset_inter_left Set.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl H
#align set.inter_subset_inter_right Set.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_left
#align set.union_inter_cancel_left Set.union_inter_cancel_left
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_right
#align set.union_inter_cancel_right Set.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_setOf_eq_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
rfl
#align set.inter_set_of_eq_sep Set.inter_setOf_eq_sep
theorem setOf_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : Set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.set_of_inter_eq_sep Set.setOf_inter_eq_sep
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_left Set.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_right Set.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_left Set.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_right Set.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_left Set.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_right Set.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_left Set.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_right Set.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.union_union_union_comm Set.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_inter_comm Set.inter_inter_inter_comm
/-!
### Lemmas about `insert`
`insert α s` is the set `{α} ∪ s`.
-/
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align set.insert_def Set.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ insert x s := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_insert Set.subset_insert
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : x ∈ insert x s :=
Or.inl rfl
#align set.mem_insert Set.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : Set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_insert_of_mem Set.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
id
#align set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne : b ∈ insert a s → b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
Or.resolve_left
#align set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert : b ∈ insert a s → b ∉ s → b = a :=
Or.resolve_right
#align set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_insert_iff Set.mem_insert_iff
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_right_of_imp fun e => e.symm ▸ h
#align set.insert_eq_of_mem Set.insert_eq_of_mem
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem {s : Set α} (t : Set α) {a : α} : a ∉ s → s ≠ insert a t :=
mt fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
#align set.ne_insert_of_not_mem Set.ne_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align set.insert_eq_self Set.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align set.insert_ne_self Set.insert_ne_self
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_insert_iff, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align set.insert_subset Set.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha, hs⟩
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t := fun _ => Or.imp_right (@h _)
#align set.insert_subset_insert Set.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] theorem insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => ?_, insert_subset_insert⟩
rcases h (subset_insert _ _ hx) with (rfl | hxt)
exacts [(ha hx).elim, hxt]
#align set.insert_subset_insert_iff Set.insert_subset_insert_iff
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
forall₂_congr fun _ hb => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha
#align set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem Set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem
theorem ssubset_iff_insert {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := by
simp only [insert_subset_iff, exists_and_right, ssubset_def, not_subset]
aesop
#align set.ssubset_iff_insert Set.ssubset_iff_insert
theorem ssubset_insert {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_insert.2 ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align set.ssubset_insert Set.ssubset_insert
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.insert_comm Set.insert_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_insert _ _
#align set.insert_idem Set.insert_idem
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.insert_union Set.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_insert Set.union_insert
@[simp]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert a s⟩
#align set.insert_nonempty Set.insert_nonempty
instance (a : α) (s : Set α) : Nonempty (insert a s : Set α) :=
(insert_nonempty a s).to_subtype
theorem insert_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_and_left
#align set.insert_inter_distrib Set.insert_inter_distrib
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_or_distrib_left
#align set.insert_union_distrib Set.insert_union_distrib
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert a s) ha,
congr_arg (fun x => insert x s)⟩
#align set.insert_inj Set.insert_inj
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x)
(x) (h : x ∈ s) : P x :=
H _ (Or.inr h)
#align set.forall_of_forall_insert Set.forall_of_forall_insert
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a)
(x) (h : x ∈ insert a s) : P x :=
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ ha) (H _)
#align set.forall_insert_of_forall Set.forall_insert_of_forall
/- Porting note: ∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x is parsed as ∃ x, x ∈ insert a s ∧ P x,
where in Lean3 it was parsed as `∃ x, ∃ (h : x ∈ insert a s), P x` -/
theorem exists_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ (P a ∨ ∃ x ∈ s, P x) := by
simp [mem_insert_iff, or_and_right, exists_and_left, exists_or]
#align set.bex_insert_iff Set.exists_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias bex_insert_iff := exists_mem_insert
theorem forall_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
forall₂_or_left.trans <| and_congr_left' forall_eq
#align set.ball_insert_iff Set.forall_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_insert_iff := forall_mem_insert
/-! ### Lemmas about singletons -/
/- porting note: instance was in core in Lean3 -/
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Set α) :=
⟨fun x => Set.ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, mem_insert_iff, or_false]
exact Iff.rfl⟩
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) = insert a ∅ :=
(insert_emptyc_eq a).symm
#align set.singleton_def Set.singleton_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : Set α) ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_singleton_iff Set.mem_singleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { n | n = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton' {a : α} : { x | a = x } = {a} :=
ext fun _ => eq_comm
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton' Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton'
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
--Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute
theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Set α) :=
@rfl _ _
#align set.mem_singleton Set.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Set α)) : x = y :=
h
#align set.eq_of_mem_singleton Set.eq_of_mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : Set α) ↔ x = y :=
ext_iff.trans eq_iff_eq_cancel_left
#align set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
singleton_eq_singleton_iff.mp
#align set.singleton_injective Set.singleton_injective
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : Set α) :=
H
#align set.mem_singleton_of_eq Set.mem_singleton_of_eq
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = ({x} : Set α) ∪ s :=
rfl
#align set.insert_eq Set.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, rfl⟩
#align set.singleton_nonempty Set.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty _).ne_empty
#align set.singleton_ne_empty Set.singleton_ne_empty
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Set α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align set.empty_ssubset_singleton Set.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
forall_eq
#align set.singleton_subset_iff Set.singleton_subset_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align set.singleton_subset_singleton Set.singleton_subset_singleton
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { b | b = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton Set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_union : {a} ∪ s = insert a s :=
rfl
#align set.singleton_union Set.singleton_union
@[simp]
theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s :=
union_comm _ _
#align set.union_singleton Set.union_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_nonempty : ({a} ∩ s).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, mem_inter_iff, mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
#align set.singleton_inter_nonempty Set.singleton_inter_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_nonempty : (s ∩ {a}).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_singleton_nonempty Set.inter_singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans singleton_inter_nonempty.not
#align set.singleton_inter_eq_empty Set.singleton_inter_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
#align set.inter_singleton_eq_empty Set.inter_singleton_eq_empty
theorem nmem_singleton_empty {s : Set α} : s ∉ ({∅} : Set (Set α)) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.nmem_singleton_empty Set.nmem_singleton_empty
instance uniqueSingleton (a : α) : Unique (↥({a} : Set α)) :=
⟨⟨⟨a, mem_singleton a⟩⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.eq h⟩
#align set.unique_singleton Set.uniqueSingleton
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_comm.trans <| and_congr_left' singleton_subset_iff
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.trans <|
and_congr_left fun H => ⟨fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩, fun ⟨x, h⟩ => H x h ▸ h⟩
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
-- while `simp` is capable of proving this, it is not capable of turning the LHS into the RHS.
@[simp]
theorem default_coe_singleton (x : α) : (default : ({x} : Set α)) = ⟨x, rfl⟩ :=
rfl
#align set.default_coe_singleton Set.default_coe_singleton
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
section Sep
variable {p q : α → Prop} {x : α}
theorem mem_sep (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } :=
⟨xs, px⟩
#align set.mem_sep Set.mem_sep
@[simp]
theorem sep_mem_eq : { x ∈ s | x ∈ t } = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align set.sep_mem_eq Set.sep_mem_eq
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_sep_iff Set.mem_sep_iff
theorem sep_ext_iff : { x ∈ s | p x } = { x ∈ s | q x } ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
#align set.sep_ext_iff Set.sep_ext_iff
theorem sep_eq_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : { x ∈ t | x ∈ s } = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h
#align set.sep_eq_of_subset Set.sep_eq_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem sep_subset (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ s | p x } ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
#align set.sep_subset Set.sep_subset
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true : { x ∈ s | p x } = s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
#align set.sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true Set.sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false : { x ∈ s | p x } = ∅ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false_iff, not_and]
#align set.sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false Set.sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_true : { x ∈ s | True } = s :=
inter_univ s
#align set.sep_true Set.sep_true
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_false : { x ∈ s | False } = ∅ :=
inter_empty s
#align set.sep_false Set.sep_false
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_empty (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ (∅ : Set α) | p x } = ∅ :=
empty_inter {x | p x}
#align set.sep_empty Set.sep_empty
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_univ : { x ∈ (univ : Set α) | p x } = { x | p x } :=
univ_inter {x | p x}
#align set.sep_univ Set.sep_univ
@[simp]
theorem sep_union : { x | (x ∈ s ∨ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
union_inter_distrib_right { x | x ∈ s } { x | x ∈ t } p
#align set.sep_union Set.sep_union
@[simp]
theorem sep_inter : { x | (x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_right s t {x | p x}
#align set.sep_inter Set.sep_inter
@[simp]
theorem sep_and : { x ∈ s | p x ∧ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_left s {x | p x} {x | q x}
#align set.sep_and Set.sep_and
@[simp]
theorem sep_or : { x ∈ s | p x ∨ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_union_distrib_left s p q
#align set.sep_or Set.sep_or
@[simp]
theorem sep_setOf : { x ∈ { y | p y } | q x } = { x | p x ∧ q x } :=
rfl
#align set.sep_set_of Set.sep_setOf
end Sep
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {α : Type*} {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.subset_singleton_iff Set.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff_eq {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {x} := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨fun _ => Or.inl rfl, fun _ => empty_subset _⟩
· simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, hs, hs.ne_empty]
#align set.subset_singleton_iff_eq Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq
theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff (h : s.Nonempty) : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff_eq.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Set.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊂ {x} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [ssubset_iff_subset_ne, subset_singleton_iff_eq, or_and_right, and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff,
and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun h => h ▸ (singleton_ne_empty _).symm
#align set.ssubset_singleton_iff Set.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Set α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton {α} [Subsingleton α] (s t : Set α) [Nonempty s]
[Nonempty t] : s = t :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.trans nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.symm
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {α} [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} (t : Set α)
(hs : s.Nonempty) [Nonempty t] : s = t :=
have := hs.to_subtype; eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton s t
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_zero [Subsingleton α] [Zero α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {0} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {0} h
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_one [Subsingleton α] [One α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {1} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {1} h
/-! ### Disjointness -/
protected theorem disjoint_iff : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ ∅ :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le
#align set.disjoint_iff Set.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
theorem _root_.Disjoint.inter_eq : Disjoint s t → s ∩ t = ∅ :=
Disjoint.eq_bot
#align disjoint.inter_eq Disjoint.inter_eq
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => not_and
#align set.disjoint_left Set.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align set.disjoint_right Set.disjoint_right
lemma not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Set.disjoint_iff.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ not_not
#align set.not_disjoint_iff Set.not_disjoint_iff
lemma not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬ Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := not_disjoint_iff
#align set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align set.nonempty.not_disjoint Set.Nonempty.not_disjoint
lemma disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Set α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
(em _).imp_right not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter.1
#align set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter Set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter
lemma disjoint_iff_forall_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ t → a ≠ b := by
simp only [Ne, disjoint_left, @imp_not_comm _ (_ = _), forall_eq']
#align set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne Set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne
alias ⟨_root_.Disjoint.ne_of_mem, _⟩ := disjoint_iff_forall_ne
#align disjoint.ne_of_mem Disjoint.ne_of_mem
lemma disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_left h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_left Set.disjoint_of_subset_left
lemma disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_right h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_right Set.disjoint_of_subset_right
lemma disjoint_of_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h : Disjoint s₂ t₂) : Disjoint s₁ t₁ :=
h.mono hs ht
#align set.disjoint_of_subset Set.disjoint_of_subset
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := disjoint_sup_left
#align set.disjoint_union_left Set.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := disjoint_sup_right
#align set.disjoint_union_right Set.disjoint_union_right
@[simp] lemma disjoint_empty (s : Set α) : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
#align set.disjoint_empty Set.disjoint_empty
@[simp] lemma empty_disjoint (s : Set α) : Disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
#align set.empty_disjoint Set.empty_disjoint
@[simp] lemma univ_disjoint : Disjoint univ s ↔ s = ∅ := top_disjoint
#align set.univ_disjoint Set.univ_disjoint
@[simp] lemma disjoint_univ : Disjoint s univ ↔ s = ∅ := disjoint_top
#align set.disjoint_univ Set.disjoint_univ
lemma disjoint_sdiff_left : Disjoint (t \ s) s := disjoint_sdiff_self_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_left Set.disjoint_sdiff_left
lemma disjoint_sdiff_right : Disjoint s (t \ s) := disjoint_sdiff_self_right
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_right Set.disjoint_sdiff_right
-- TODO: prove this in terms of a lattice lemma
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_inter Set.disjoint_sdiff_inter
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
#align set.diff_union_diff_cancel Set.diff_union_diff_cancel
theorem diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
#align set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union Set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union
@[simp default+1]
lemma disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint {a} s ↔ a ∉ s := by simp [Set.disjoint_iff, subset_def]
#align set.disjoint_singleton_left Set.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s {a} ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align set.disjoint_singleton_right Set.disjoint_singleton_right
lemma disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Set α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
simp
#align set.disjoint_singleton Set.disjoint_singleton
lemma subset_diff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ Disjoint s u := le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
#align set.subset_diff Set.subset_diff
lemma ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t \ {a} := by
simp [ssubset_iff_insert, subset_diff, insert_subset_iff]; aesop
theorem inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_left Set.inter_diff_distrib_left
theorem inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_right Set.inter_diff_distrib_right
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
theorem compl_def (s : Set α) : sᶜ = { x | x ∉ s } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_def Set.compl_def
theorem mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ :=
h
#align set.mem_compl Set.mem_compl
theorem compl_setOf {α} (p : α → Prop) : { a | p a }ᶜ = { a | ¬p a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_set_of Set.compl_setOf
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s :=
h
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_compl Set.not_mem_of_mem_compl
theorem not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_mem_compl_iff Set.not_mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
#align set.inter_compl_self Set.inter_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ :=
compl_inf_eq_bot
#align set.compl_inter_self Set.compl_inter_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Set α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
#align set.compl_empty Set.compl_empty
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
#align set.compl_union Set.compl_union
theorem compl_inter (s t : Set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
#align set.compl_inter Set.compl_inter
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Set α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
#align set.compl_univ Set.compl_univ
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
#align set.compl_empty_iff Set.compl_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
#align set.compl_univ_iff Set.compl_univ_iff
theorem compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty :=
compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.compl_ne_univ Set.compl_ne_univ
theorem nonempty_compl : sᶜ.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
(ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
#align set.nonempty_compl Set.nonempty_compl
@[simp] lemma nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial α] (x : α) : Set.Nonempty {x}ᶜ := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_ne x
exact ⟨y, by simp [hy]⟩
theorem mem_compl_singleton_iff {a x : α} : x ∈ ({a} : Set α)ᶜ ↔ x ≠ a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_compl_singleton_iff Set.mem_compl_singleton_iff
theorem compl_singleton_eq (a : α) : ({a} : Set α)ᶜ = { x | x ≠ a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_singleton_eq Set.compl_singleton_eq
@[simp]
theorem compl_ne_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({ x | x ≠ a } : Set α)ᶜ = {a} :=
compl_compl _
#align set.compl_ne_eq_singleton Set.compl_ne_eq_singleton
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_not_and_not
#align set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl Set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => and_iff_not_or_not
#align set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl Set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl
@[simp]
theorem union_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => em _
#align set.union_compl_self Set.union_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_union_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
#align set.compl_union_self Set.compl_union_self
theorem compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
#align set.compl_subset_comm Set.compl_subset_comm
theorem subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
@le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
#align set.subset_compl_comm Set.subset_compl_comm
@[simp]
theorem compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_compl_iff_le (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.compl_subset_compl Set.compl_subset_compl
@[gcongr] theorem compl_subset_compl_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ := compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint t s :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_left (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_right (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset : Disjoint sᶜ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
disjoint_compl_left_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
theorem disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset : Disjoint s tᶜ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
disjoint_compl_right_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_right⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
#align disjoint.subset_compl_right Disjoint.subset_compl_right
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_left⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
#align disjoint.subset_compl_left Disjoint.subset_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left⟩ := disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_left HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right⟩ := disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_right HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : Set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@isCompl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
#align set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset Set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : Set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
Iff.symm <| eq_univ_iff_forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => or_iff_not_imp_left
#align set.compl_subset_iff_union Set.compl_subset_iff_union
@[simp]
theorem subset_compl_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ {a}ᶜ ↔ a ∉ s :=
subset_compl_comm.trans singleton_subset_iff
#align set.subset_compl_singleton_iff Set.subset_compl_singleton_iff
theorem inter_subset (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr' fun _ => and_imp.trans <| imp_congr_right fun _ => imp_iff_not_or
#align set.inter_subset Set.inter_subset
theorem inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : Set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans <| exists_congr fun x => by simp [mem_compl]).symm
#align set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff Set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t := fun h => h.2 hx
#align set.not_mem_diff_of_mem Set.not_mem_diff_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_diff Set.mem_of_mem_diff
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_diff Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s := by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
#align set.diff_eq_compl_inter Set.diff_eq_compl_inter
theorem nonempty_diff {s t : Set α} : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
inter_compl_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty_diff Set.nonempty_diff
theorem diff_subset {s t : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s from sdiff_le
#align set.diff_subset Set.diff_subset
theorem diff_subset_compl (s t : Set α) : s \ t ⊆ tᶜ :=
diff_eq_compl_inter ▸ inter_subset_left
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : Set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ u \ s = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
#align set.union_diff_cancel' Set.union_diff_cancel'
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
#align set.union_diff_cancel Set.union_diff_cancel
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_left Set.union_diff_cancel_left
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_right Set.union_diff_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
#align set.union_diff_left Set.union_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align set.union_diff_right Set.union_diff_right
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
#align set.union_diff_distrib Set.union_diff_distrib
theorem inter_diff_assoc (a b c : Set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) :=
inf_sdiff_assoc
#align set.inter_diff_assoc Set.inter_diff_assoc
@[simp]
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : Set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
#align set.inter_diff_self Set.inter_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s \ t = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
#align set.inter_union_diff Set.inter_union_diff
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s := by
rw [union_comm]
exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _
#align set.diff_union_inter Set.diff_union_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
#align set.inter_union_compl Set.inter_union_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂ from sdiff_le_sdiff
#align set.diff_subset_diff Set.diff_subset_diff
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_right ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
#align set.diff_subset_diff_left Set.diff_subset_diff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : Set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left ‹t ≤ u›
#align set.diff_subset_diff_right Set.diff_subset_diff_right
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : Set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
#align set.compl_eq_univ_diff Set.compl_eq_univ_diff
@[simp]
theorem empty_diff (s : Set α) : (∅ \ s : Set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
#align set.empty_diff Set.empty_diff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
#align set.diff_eq_empty Set.diff_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem diff_empty {s : Set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
#align set.diff_empty Set.diff_empty
@[simp]
theorem diff_univ (s : Set α) : s \ univ = ∅ :=
diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
#align set.diff_univ Set.diff_univ
theorem diff_diff {u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
#align set.diff_diff Set.diff_diff
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
theorem diff_diff_comm {s t u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
#align set.diff_diff_comm Set.diff_diff_comm
theorem diff_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u from sdiff_le_iff
#align set.diff_subset_iff Set.diff_subset_iff
theorem subset_diff_union (s t : Set α) : s ⊆ s \ t ∪ t :=
show s ≤ s \ t ∪ t from le_sdiff_sup
#align set.subset_diff_union Set.subset_diff_union
theorem diff_union_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s \ t ∪ t = s :=
Subset.antisymm (union_subset diff_subset h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
#align set.diff_union_of_subset Set.diff_union_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_subset_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} : s \ {x} ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ insert x t := by
rw [← union_singleton, union_comm]
apply diff_subset_iff
#align set.diff_singleton_subset_iff Set.diff_singleton_subset_iff
theorem subset_diff_singleton {x : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hx : x ∉ s) : s ⊆ t \ {x} :=
subset_inter h <| subset_compl_comm.1 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hx
#align set.subset_diff_singleton Set.subset_diff_singleton
theorem subset_insert_diff_singleton (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ insert x (s \ {x}) := by
rw [← diff_singleton_subset_iff]
#align set.subset_insert_diff_singleton Set.subset_insert_diff_singleton
theorem diff_subset_comm {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t from sdiff_le_comm
#align set.diff_subset_comm Set.diff_subset_comm
theorem diff_inter {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
#align set.diff_inter Set.diff_inter
theorem diff_inter_diff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
#align set.diff_inter_diff Set.diff_inter_diff
theorem diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_compl
#align set.diff_compl Set.diff_compl
theorem diff_diff_right {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
#align set.diff_diff_right Set.diff_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_of_mem (s) (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s \ t = s \ t := by
ext
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [or_imp, h]
#align set.insert_diff_of_mem Set.insert_diff_of_mem
theorem insert_diff_of_not_mem (s) (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s \ t = insert a (s \ t) := by
classical
ext x
by_cases h' : x ∈ t
· have : x ≠ a := by
intro H
rw [H] at h'
exact h h'
simp [h, h', this]
· simp [h, h']
#align set.insert_diff_of_not_mem Set.insert_diff_of_not_mem
theorem insert_diff_self_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ {a} = s := by
ext x
simp [and_iff_left_of_imp fun hx : x ∈ s => show x ≠ a from fun hxa => h <| hxa ▸ hx]
#align set.insert_diff_self_of_not_mem Set.insert_diff_self_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_eq_singleton {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ s = {a} := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, or_and_right, and_not_self_iff,
or_false_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl
exact h
#align set.insert_diff_eq_singleton Set.insert_diff_eq_singleton
theorem inter_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ insert a t = insert a (s ∩ t) := by
rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align set.inter_insert_of_mem Set.inter_insert_of_mem
theorem insert_inter_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s ∩ t = insert a (s ∩ t) := by
rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align set.insert_inter_of_mem Set.insert_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ insert a t = s ∩ t :=
ext fun _ => and_congr_right fun hx => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
#align set.inter_insert_of_not_mem Set.inter_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
ext fun _ => and_congr_left fun hx => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
#align set.insert_inter_of_not_mem Set.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_self {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self _ _
#align set.union_diff_self Set.union_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_self {s t : Set α} : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sdiff_sup_self _ _
#align set.diff_union_self Set.diff_union_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self {a b : Set α} : b \ a ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
#align set.diff_inter_self Set.diff_inter_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
#align set.diff_inter_self_eq_diff Set.diff_inter_self_eq_diff
@[simp]
theorem diff_self_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
#align set.diff_self_inter Set.diff_self_inter
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_eq_self {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 <| by simp [h]
#align set.diff_singleton_eq_self Set.diff_singleton_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_sSubset {s : Set α} {a : α} : s \ {a} ⊂ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
sdiff_le.lt_iff_ne.trans <| sdiff_eq_left.not.trans <| by simp
#align set.diff_singleton_ssubset Set.diff_singleton_sSubset
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_singleton {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a (s \ {a}) = insert a s := by
simp [insert_eq, union_diff_self, -union_singleton, -singleton_union]
#align set.insert_diff_singleton Set.insert_diff_singleton
theorem insert_diff_singleton_comm (hab : a ≠ b) (s : Set α) :
insert a (s \ {b}) = insert a s \ {b} := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, union_diff_distrib,
diff_singleton_eq_self (mem_singleton_iff.not.2 hab.symm)]
#align set.insert_diff_singleton_comm Set.insert_diff_singleton_comm
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem diff_self {s : Set α} : s \ s = ∅ :=
sdiff_self
#align set.diff_self Set.diff_self
theorem diff_diff_right_self (s t : Set α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
#align set.diff_diff_right_self Set.diff_diff_right_self
theorem diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
#align set.diff_diff_cancel_left Set.diff_diff_cancel_left
theorem mem_diff_singleton {x y : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ s \ {y} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ≠ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_diff_singleton Set.mem_diff_singleton
theorem mem_diff_singleton_empty {t : Set (Set α)} : s ∈ t \ {∅} ↔ s ∈ t ∧ s.Nonempty :=
mem_diff_singleton.trans <| and_congr_right' nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.mem_diff_singleton_empty Set.mem_diff_singleton_empty
theorem subset_insert_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
s ⊆ insert x t ↔ s ⊆ t ∨ (x ∈ s ∧ s \ {x} ⊆ t) := by
rw [← diff_singleton_subset_iff]
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· rw [and_iff_right hx, or_iff_right_of_imp diff_subset.trans]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self hx, or_iff_left_of_imp And.right]
theorem union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s ∪ s ∩ t :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
#align set.union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter Set.union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter
/-! ### Lemmas about pairs -/
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Set α) = {a} :=
union_self _
#align set.pair_eq_singleton Set.pair_eq_singleton
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Set α) = {b, a} :=
union_comm _ _
#align set.pair_comm Set.pair_comm
theorem pair_eq_pair_iff {x y z w : α} :
({x, y} : Set α) = {z, w} ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by
simp [subset_antisymm_iff, insert_subset_iff]; aesop
#align set.pair_eq_pair_iff Set.pair_eq_pair_iff
theorem pair_diff_left (hne : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α) \ {a} = {b} := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ (mem_singleton a), diff_singleton_eq_self (by simpa)]
theorem pair_diff_right (hne : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α) \ {b} = {a} := by
rw [pair_comm, pair_diff_left hne.symm]
theorem pair_subset_iff : {a, b} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s := by
rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
theorem pair_subset (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : {a, b} ⊆ s :=
pair_subset_iff.2 ⟨ha,hb⟩
theorem subset_pair_iff : s ⊆ {a, b} ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a ∨ x = b := by
simp [subset_def]
theorem subset_pair_iff_eq {x y : α} : s ⊆ {x, y} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {x} ∨ s = {y} ∨ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨?_, by rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp [pair_subset_iff]⟩
rw [subset_insert_iff, subset_singleton_iff_eq, subset_singleton_iff_eq,
← subset_empty_iff (s := s \ {x}), diff_subset_iff, union_empty, subset_singleton_iff_eq]
have h : x ∈ s → {y} = s \ {x} → s = {x,y} := fun h₁ h₂ ↦ by simp [h₁, h₂]
tauto
theorem Nonempty.subset_pair_iff_eq (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a, b} ↔ s = {a} ∨ s = {b} ∨ s = {a, b} := by
rw [Set.subset_pair_iff_eq, or_iff_right]; exact hs.ne_empty
/-! ### Symmetric difference -/
section
open scoped symmDiff
theorem mem_symmDiff : a ∈ s ∆ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t ∨ a ∈ t ∧ a ∉ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_symm_diff Set.mem_symmDiff
protected theorem symmDiff_def (s t : Set α) : s ∆ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s :=
rfl
#align set.symm_diff_def Set.symmDiff_def
theorem symmDiff_subset_union : s ∆ t ⊆ s ∪ t :=
@symmDiff_le_sup (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.symm_diff_subset_union Set.symmDiff_subset_union
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_empty : s ∆ t = ∅ ↔ s = t :=
symmDiff_eq_bot
#align set.symm_diff_eq_empty Set.symmDiff_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_nonempty : (s ∆ t).Nonempty ↔ s ≠ t :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans symmDiff_eq_empty.not
#align set.symm_diff_nonempty Set.symmDiff_nonempty
theorem inter_symmDiff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∆ u = (s ∩ t) ∆ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_symmDiff_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_symm_diff_distrib_left Set.inter_symmDiff_distrib_left
theorem inter_symmDiff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∆ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∆ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_symmDiff_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_symm_diff_distrib_right Set.inter_symmDiff_distrib_right
theorem subset_symmDiff_union_symmDiff_left (h : Disjoint s t) : u ⊆ s ∆ u ∪ t ∆ u :=
h.le_symmDiff_sup_symmDiff_left
#align set.subset_symm_diff_union_symm_diff_left Set.subset_symmDiff_union_symmDiff_left
theorem subset_symmDiff_union_symmDiff_right (h : Disjoint t u) : s ⊆ s ∆ t ∪ s ∆ u :=
h.le_symmDiff_sup_symmDiff_right
#align set.subset_symm_diff_union_symm_diff_right Set.subset_symmDiff_union_symmDiff_right
end
/-! ### Powerset -/
#align set.powerset Set.powerset
theorem mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ 𝒫 s := @h
#align set.mem_powerset Set.mem_powerset
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ∈ 𝒫 s) : x ⊆ s := @h
#align set.subset_of_mem_powerset Set.subset_of_mem_powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : Set α) : x ∈ 𝒫 s ↔ x ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_powerset_iff Set.mem_powerset_iff
theorem powerset_inter (s t : Set α) : 𝒫(s ∩ t) = 𝒫 s ∩ 𝒫 t :=
ext fun _ => subset_inter_iff
#align set.powerset_inter Set.powerset_inter
@[simp]
theorem powerset_mono : 𝒫 s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => @h _ (fun _ h => h), fun h _ hu _ ha => h (hu ha)⟩
#align set.powerset_mono Set.powerset_mono
theorem monotone_powerset : Monotone (powerset : Set α → Set (Set α)) := fun _ _ => powerset_mono.2
#align set.monotone_powerset Set.monotone_powerset
@[simp]
theorem powerset_nonempty : (𝒫 s).Nonempty :=
⟨∅, fun _ h => empty_subset s h⟩
#align set.powerset_nonempty Set.powerset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem powerset_empty : 𝒫(∅ : Set α) = {∅} :=
ext fun _ => subset_empty_iff
#align set.powerset_empty Set.powerset_empty
@[simp]
theorem powerset_univ : 𝒫(univ : Set α) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall subset_univ
#align set.powerset_univ Set.powerset_univ
/-- The powerset of a singleton contains only `∅` and the singleton itself. -/
theorem powerset_singleton (x : α) : 𝒫({x} : Set α) = {∅, {x}} := by
ext y
rw [mem_powerset_iff, subset_singleton_iff_eq, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
#align set.powerset_singleton Set.powerset_singleton
/-! ### Sets defined as an if-then-else -/
theorem mem_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) (t : ¬ p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h : p, x ∈ s h) ∧ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by
split_ifs with hp
· exact ⟨fun hx => ⟨fun _ => hx, fun hnp => (hnp hp).elim⟩, fun hx => hx.1 hp⟩
· exact ⟨fun hx => ⟨fun h => (hp h).elim, fun _ => hx⟩, fun hx => hx.2 hp⟩
theorem mem_dite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else univ) ↔ ∀ h : p, x ∈ t h := by
split_ifs <;> simp_all
#align set.mem_dite_univ_right Set.mem_dite_univ_right
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t Set.univ ↔ p → x ∈ t :=
mem_dite_univ_right p (fun _ => t) x
#align set.mem_ite_univ_right Set.mem_ite_univ_right
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 2,221 | 2,223 | theorem mem_dite_univ_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : ¬p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then univ else t h) ↔ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by |
split_ifs <;> simp_all
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury G. Kudryashov, Dylan MacKenzie, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.ModEq
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
#align_import analysis.specific_limits.normed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file contains important specific limit computations in (semi-)normed groups/rings/spaces, as
well as such computations in `ℝ` when the natural proof passes through a fact about normed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Asymptotics
open scoped Classical
open Topology Nat uniformity NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop : Tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop
#align tendsto_norm_at_top_at_top tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop
theorem summable_of_absolute_convergence_real {f : ℕ → ℝ} :
(∃ r, Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, |f i|) atTop (𝓝 r)) → Summable f
| ⟨r, hr⟩ => by
refine .of_norm ⟨r, (hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg ?_ _).2 ?_⟩
· exact fun i ↦ norm_nonneg _
· simpa only using hr
#align summable_of_absolute_convergence_real summable_of_absolute_convergence_real
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem tendsto_norm_zero' {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] :
Tendsto (norm : 𝕜 → ℝ) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_norm_zero.inf <| tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun _ hx ↦ norm_pos_iff.2 hx
#align tendsto_norm_zero' tendsto_norm_zero'
namespace NormedField
theorem tendsto_norm_inverse_nhdsWithin_0_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] :
Tendsto (fun x : 𝕜 ↦ ‖x⁻¹‖) (𝓝[≠] 0) atTop :=
(tendsto_inv_zero_atTop.comp tendsto_norm_zero').congr fun x ↦ (norm_inv x).symm
#align normed_field.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhds_within_0_at_top NormedField.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhdsWithin_0_atTop
theorem tendsto_norm_zpow_nhdsWithin_0_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] {m : ℤ}
(hm : m < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x : 𝕜 ↦ ‖x ^ m‖) (𝓝[≠] 0) atTop := by
rcases neg_surjective m with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rw [neg_lt_zero] at hm; lift m to ℕ using hm.le; rw [Int.natCast_pos] at hm
simp only [norm_pow, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, ← inv_pow]
exact (tendsto_pow_atTop hm.ne').comp NormedField.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhdsWithin_0_atTop
#align normed_field.tendsto_norm_zpow_nhds_within_0_at_top NormedField.tendsto_norm_zpow_nhdsWithin_0_atTop
/-- The (scalar) product of a sequence that tends to zero with a bounded one also tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_smul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded {ι 𝕜 𝔸 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[NormedAddCommGroup 𝔸] [Module 𝕜 𝔸] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 𝔸] {l : Filter ι} {ε : ι → 𝕜} {f : ι → 𝔸}
(hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝 0)) (hf : Filter.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f)) :
Tendsto (ε • f) l (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← isLittleO_one_iff 𝕜] at hε ⊢
simpa using IsLittleO.smul_isBigO hε (hf.isBigO_const (one_ne_zero : (1 : 𝕜) ≠ 0))
#align normed_field.tendsto_zero_smul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded NormedField.tendsto_zero_smul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_zpow {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {m : ℤ} {x : 𝕜} :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ x ^ m) x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ m := by
refine ⟨?_, continuousAt_zpow₀ _ _⟩
contrapose!; rintro ⟨rfl, hm⟩ hc
exact not_tendsto_atTop_of_tendsto_nhds (hc.tendsto.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds).norm
(tendsto_norm_zpow_nhdsWithin_0_atTop hm)
#align normed_field.continuous_at_zpow NormedField.continuousAt_zpow
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Normed.lean | 90 | 92 | theorem continuousAt_inv {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {x : 𝕜} :
ContinuousAt Inv.inv x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by |
simpa [(zero_lt_one' ℤ).not_le] using @continuousAt_zpow _ _ (-1) x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Supported
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.algebraic_independent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
/-!
# Algebraic Independence
This file defines algebraic independence of a family of element of an `R` algebra.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicIndependent` - `AlgebraicIndependent R x` states the family of elements `x`
is algebraically independent over `R`, meaning that the canonical map out of the multivariable
polynomial ring is injective.
* `AlgebraicIndependent.repr` - The canonical map from the subalgebra generated by an
algebraic independent family into the polynomial ring.
## References
* [Stacks: Transcendence](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/030D)
## TODO
Define the transcendence degree and show it is independent of the choice of a
transcendence basis.
## Tags
transcendence basis, transcendence degree, transcendence
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Subalgebra MvPolynomial Algebra
open scoped Classical
universe x u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} (R : Type*) {K : Type*}
variable {A : Type*} {A' A'' : Type*} {V : Type u} {V' : Type*}
variable (x : ι → A)
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [CommRing A'] [CommRing A'']
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R A'] [Algebra R A'']
variable {a b : R}
/-- `AlgebraicIndependent R x` states the family of elements `x`
is algebraically independent over `R`, meaning that the canonical
map out of the multivariable polynomial ring is injective. -/
def AlgebraicIndependent : Prop :=
Injective (MvPolynomial.aeval x : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] A)
#align algebraic_independent AlgebraicIndependent
variable {R} {x}
theorem algebraicIndependent_iff_ker_eq_bot :
AlgebraicIndependent R x ↔
RingHom.ker (MvPolynomial.aeval x : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] A).toRingHom = ⊥ :=
RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot _
#align algebraic_independent_iff_ker_eq_bot algebraicIndependent_iff_ker_eq_bot
theorem algebraicIndependent_iff :
AlgebraicIndependent R x ↔
∀ p : MvPolynomial ι R, MvPolynomial.aeval (x : ι → A) p = 0 → p = 0 :=
injective_iff_map_eq_zero _
#align algebraic_independent_iff algebraicIndependent_iff
theorem AlgebraicIndependent.eq_zero_of_aeval_eq_zero (h : AlgebraicIndependent R x) :
∀ p : MvPolynomial ι R, MvPolynomial.aeval (x : ι → A) p = 0 → p = 0 :=
algebraicIndependent_iff.1 h
#align algebraic_independent.eq_zero_of_aeval_eq_zero AlgebraicIndependent.eq_zero_of_aeval_eq_zero
theorem algebraicIndependent_iff_injective_aeval :
AlgebraicIndependent R x ↔ Injective (MvPolynomial.aeval x : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] A) :=
Iff.rfl
#align algebraic_independent_iff_injective_aeval algebraicIndependent_iff_injective_aeval
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AlgebraicIndependent.lean | 90 | 96 | theorem algebraicIndependent_empty_type_iff [IsEmpty ι] :
AlgebraicIndependent R x ↔ Injective (algebraMap R A) := by |
have : aeval x = (Algebra.ofId R A).comp (@isEmptyAlgEquiv R ι _ _).toAlgHom := by
ext i
exact IsEmpty.elim' ‹IsEmpty ι› i
rw [AlgebraicIndependent, this, ← Injective.of_comp_iff' _ (@isEmptyAlgEquiv R ι _ _).bijective]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.adj_matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
/-!
# Adjacency Matrices
This module defines the adjacency matrix of a graph, and provides theorems connecting graph
properties to computational properties of the matrix.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix`: `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`.
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.to_graph`: for `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : A.IsAdjMatrix`,
`h.to_graph` is the simple graph induced by `A`.
* `Matrix.compl`: for `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be
the adjacency matrix of the complement graph of the graph induced by `A`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix`: the adjacency matrix of a `SimpleGraph`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk`: each entry of the `n`th power of
a graph's adjacency matrix counts the number of length-`n` walks between the corresponding
pair of vertices.
-/
open Matrix
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph
variable {V α β : Type*}
namespace Matrix
/-- `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`. -/
structure IsAdjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] (A : Matrix V V α) : Prop where
zero_or_one : ∀ i j, A i j = 0 ∨ A i j = 1 := by aesop
symm : A.IsSymm := by aesop
apply_diag : ∀ i, A i i = 0 := by aesop
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix Matrix.IsAdjMatrix
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A : Matrix V V α}
@[simp]
theorem apply_diag_ne [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i : V) :
¬A i i = 1 := by simp [h.apply_diag i]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_diag_ne Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_diag_ne
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_one_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 1 ↔ A i j = 0 := by obtain h | h := h.zero_or_one i j <;> simp [h]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_ne_one_iff Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_ne_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_zero_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 0 ↔ A i j = 1 := by rw [← apply_ne_one_iff h, Classical.not_not]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_ne_zero_iff Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_ne_zero_iff
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : IsAdjMatrix A`,
`h.toGraph` is the simple graph whose adjacency matrix is `A`. -/
@[simps]
def toGraph [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj i j := A i j = 1
symm i j hij := by simp only; rwa [h.symm.apply i j]
loopless i := by simp [h]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.to_graph Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.toGraph
instance [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
DecidableRel h.toGraph.Adj := by
simp only [toGraph]
infer_instance
end IsAdjMatrix
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be the adjacency matrix of
the complement graph of the graph induced by `A.adjMatrix`. -/
def compl [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α) : Matrix V V α :=
fun i j => ite (i = j) 0 (ite (A i j = 0) 1 0)
#align matrix.compl Matrix.compl
section Compl
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α)
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply_diag [Zero α] [One α] (i : V) : A.compl i i = 0 := by simp [compl]
#align matrix.compl_apply_diag Matrix.compl_apply_diag
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply [Zero α] [One α] (i j : V) : A.compl i j = 0 ∨ A.compl i j = 1 := by
unfold compl
split_ifs <;> simp
#align matrix.compl_apply Matrix.compl_apply
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : A.compl.IsSymm := by
ext
simp [compl, h.apply, eq_comm]
#align matrix.is_symm_compl Matrix.isSymm_compl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/AdjMatrix.lean | 121 | 122 | theorem isAdjMatrix_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
{ symm := by | simp [h] }
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sublists
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
#align_import group_theory.free_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f93c11933efbc3c2f0299e47b8ff83e9b539cbf6"
/-!
# Free groups
This file defines free groups over a type. Furthermore, it is shown that the free group construction
is an instance of a monad. For the result that `FreeGroup` is the left adjoint to the forgetful
functor from groups to types, see `Algebra/Category/Group/Adjunctions`.
## Main definitions
* `FreeGroup`/`FreeAddGroup`: the free group (resp. free additive group) associated to a type
`α` defined as the words over `a : α × Bool` modulo the relation `a * x * x⁻¹ * b = a * b`.
* `FreeGroup.mk`/`FreeAddGroup.mk`: the canonical quotient map `List (α × Bool) → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.of`/`FreeAddGroup.of`: the canonical injection `α → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.lift f`/`FreeAddGroup.lift`: the canonical group homomorphism `FreeGroup α →* G`
given a group `G` and a function `f : α → G`.
## Main statements
* `FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser`/`FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser`: The Church-Rosser theorem for word
reduction (also known as Newman's diamond lemma).
* `FreeGroup.freeGroupUnitEquivInt`: The free group over the one-point type
is isomorphic to the integers.
* The free group construction is an instance of a monad.
## Implementation details
First we introduce the one step reduction relation `FreeGroup.Red.Step`:
`w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v`, its reflexive transitive closure `FreeGroup.Red.trans`
and prove that its join is an equivalence relation. Then we introduce `FreeGroup α` as a quotient
over `FreeGroup.Red.Step`.
For the additive version we introduce the same relation under a different name so that we can
distinguish the quotient types more easily.
## Tags
free group, Newman's diamond lemma, Church-Rosser theorem
-/
open Relation
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u}
attribute [local simp] List.append_eq_has_append
-- Porting note: to_additive.map_namespace is not supported yet
-- worked around it by putting a few extra manual mappings (but not too many all in all)
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `FreeGroup `FreeAddGroup
/-- Reduction step for the additive free group relation: `w + x + (-x) + v ~> w + v` -/
inductive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeAddGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
#align free_add_group.red.step FreeAddGroup.Red.Step
attribute [simp] FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not
/-- Reduction step for the multiplicative free group relation: `w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step]
inductive FreeGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
#align free_group.red.step FreeGroup.Red.Step
attribute [simp] FreeGroup.Red.Step.not
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red "Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step`"]
def Red : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop :=
ReflTransGen Red.Step
#align free_group.red FreeGroup.Red
#align free_add_group.red FreeAddGroup.Red
@[to_additive (attr := refl)]
theorem Red.refl : Red L L :=
ReflTransGen.refl
#align free_group.red.refl FreeGroup.Red.refl
#align free_add_group.red.refl FreeAddGroup.Red.refl
@[to_additive (attr := trans)]
theorem Red.trans : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₂ L₃ → Red L₁ L₃ :=
ReflTransGen.trans
#align free_group.red.trans FreeGroup.Red.trans
#align free_add_group.red.trans FreeAddGroup.Red.trans
namespace Red
/-- Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there are words
`w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃xx⁻¹w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄` -/
@[to_additive "Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there
are words `w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃ + x + (-x) + w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄`"]
theorem Step.length : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → L₂.length + 2 = L₁.length
| _, _, @Red.Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by rw [List.length_append, List.length_append]; rfl
#align free_group.red.step.length FreeGroup.Red.Step.length
#align free_add_group.red.step.length FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.length
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.not_rev {x b} : Step (L₁ ++ (x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂) := by
cases b <;> exact Step.not
#align free_group.red.step.bnot_rev FreeGroup.Red.Step.not_rev
#align free_add_group.red.step.bnot_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not {x b} : Red.Step ((x, b) :: (x, !b) :: L) L :=
@Step.not _ [] _ _ _
#align free_group.red.step.cons_bnot FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_not
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_bnot FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not_rev {x b} : Red.Step ((x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L) L :=
@Red.Step.not_rev _ [] _ _ _
#align free_group.red.step.cons_bnot_rev FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_not_rev
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_bnot_rev FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_not_rev
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₂ L₃ → Step (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₁ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by rw [← List.append_assoc, ← List.append_assoc]; constructor
#align free_group.red.step.append_left FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_left
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_left FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons {x} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Red.Step (x :: L₁) (x :: L₂) :=
@Step.append_left _ [x] _ _ H
#align free_group.red.step.cons FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_right : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → Step (L₁ ++ L₃) (L₂ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by simp
#align free_group.red.step.append_right FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_right
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_right FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_right
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_nil : ¬Step [] L := by
generalize h' : [] = L'
intro h
cases' h with L₁ L₂
simp [List.nil_eq_append] at h'
#align free_group.red.not_step_nil FreeGroup.Red.not_step_nil
#align free_add_group.red.not_step_nil FreeAddGroup.Red.not_step_nil
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_left_iff {a : α} {b : Bool} :
Step ((a, b) :: L₁) L₂ ↔ (∃ L, Step L₁ L ∧ L₂ = (a, b) :: L) ∨ L₁ = (a, ! b) :: L₂ := by
constructor
· generalize hL : ((a, b) :: L₁ : List _) = L
rintro @⟨_ | ⟨p, s'⟩, e, a', b'⟩
· simp at hL
simp [*]
· simp at hL
rcases hL with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
refine Or.inl ⟨s' ++ e, Step.not, ?_⟩
simp
· rintro (⟨L, h, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact Step.cons h
· exact Step.cons_not
#align free_group.red.step.cons_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_singleton : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, ¬Step [p] L
| (a, b) => by simp [Step.cons_left_iff, not_step_nil]
#align free_group.red.not_step_singleton FreeGroup.Red.not_step_singleton
#align free_add_group.red.not_step_singleton FreeAddGroup.Red.not_step_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_cons_iff : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, Step (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Step.cons_left_iff, iff_def, or_imp]
#align free_group.red.step.cons_cons_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.cons_cons_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.cons_cons_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.cons_cons_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left_iff : ∀ L, Step (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂
| [] => by simp
| p :: l => by simp [Step.append_left_iff l, Step.cons_cons_iff]
#align free_group.red.step.append_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.Step.append_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.step.append_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.append_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond_aux :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)} {x1 b1 x2 b2},
L₁ ++ (x1, b1) :: (x1, !b1) :: L₂ = L₃ ++ (x2, b2) :: (x2, !b2) :: L₄ →
L₁ ++ L₂ = L₃ ++ L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step (L₁ ++ L₂) L₅ ∧ Red.Step (L₃ ++ L₄) L₅
| [], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, [(x3, b3)], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [(x3, b3)], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; simp; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.cons_not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; simp; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.cons_not, Red.Step.not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: tl, _, (x4, b4) :: tl2, _, _, _, _, _, H =>
let ⟨H1, H2⟩ := List.cons.inj H
match Step.diamond_aux H2 with
| Or.inl H3 => Or.inl <| by simp [H1, H3]
| Or.inr ⟨L₅, H3, H4⟩ => Or.inr ⟨_, Step.cons H3, by simpa [H1] using Step.cons H4⟩
#align free_group.red.step.diamond_aux FreeGroup.Red.Step.diamond_aux
#align free_add_group.red.step.diamond_aux FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.diamond_aux
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)},
Red.Step L₁ L₃ → Red.Step L₂ L₄ → L₁ = L₂ → L₃ = L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step L₃ L₅ ∧ Red.Step L₄ L₅
| _, _, _, _, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.not, H => Step.diamond_aux H
#align free_group.red.step.diamond FreeGroup.Red.Step.diamond
#align free_add_group.red.step.diamond FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.diamond
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.to_red : Step L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₂ :=
ReflTransGen.single
#align free_group.red.step.to_red FreeGroup.Red.Step.to_red
#align free_add_group.red.step.to_red FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.to_red
/-- **Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma. -/
@[to_additive
"**Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma."]
theorem church_rosser : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₃ → Join Red L₂ L₃ :=
Relation.church_rosser fun a b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| b, c, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, hcd.to_red⟩
#align free_group.red.church_rosser FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser
#align free_add_group.red.church_rosser FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons {p} : Red L₁ L₂ → Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) :=
ReflTransGen.lift (List.cons p) fun _ _ => Step.cons
#align free_group.red.cons_cons FreeGroup.Red.cons_cons
#align free_add_group.red.cons_cons FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_cons
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons_iff (p) : Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq₁ : (p :: L₁ : List _) = LL₁
generalize eq₂ : (p :: L₂ : List _) = LL₂
intro h
induction' h using Relation.ReflTransGen.head_induction_on
with L₁ L₂ h₁₂ h ih
generalizing L₁ L₂
· subst_vars
cases eq₂
constructor
· subst_vars
cases' p with a b
rw [Step.cons_left_iff] at h₁₂
rcases h₁₂ with (⟨L, h₁₂, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact (ih rfl rfl).head h₁₂
· exact (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not_rev)
cons_cons
#align free_group.red.cons_cons_iff FreeGroup.Red.cons_cons_iff
#align free_add_group.red.cons_cons_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_cons_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append_left_iff : ∀ L, Red (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| p :: L => by simp [append_append_left_iff L, cons_cons_iff]
#align free_group.red.append_append_left_iff FreeGroup.Red.append_append_left_iff
#align free_add_group.red.append_append_left_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.append_append_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append (h₁ : Red L₁ L₃) (h₂ : Red L₂ L₄) : Red (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₃ ++ L₄) :=
(h₁.lift (fun L => L ++ L₂) fun _ _ => Step.append_right).trans ((append_append_left_iff _).2 h₂)
#align free_group.red.append_append FreeGroup.Red.append_append
#align free_add_group.red.append_append FreeAddGroup.Red.append_append
@[to_additive]
theorem to_append_iff : Red L (L₁ ++ L₂) ↔ ∃ L₃ L₄, L = L₃ ++ L₄ ∧ Red L₃ L₁ ∧ Red L₄ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq : L₁ ++ L₂ = L₁₂
intro h
induction' h with L' L₁₂ hLL' h ih generalizing L₁ L₂
· exact ⟨_, _, eq.symm, by rfl, by rfl⟩
· cases' h with s e a b
rcases List.append_eq_append_iff.1 eq with (⟨s', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨e', rfl, rfl⟩)
· have : L₁ ++ (s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e) = L₁ ++ s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂.tail Step.not⟩
· have : s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e' ++ L₂ = s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: (e' ++ L₂) :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁.tail Step.not, h₂⟩)
fun ⟨L₃, L₄, Eq, h₃, h₄⟩ => Eq.symm ▸ append_append h₃ h₄
#align free_group.red.to_append_iff FreeGroup.Red.to_append_iff
#align free_add_group.red.to_append_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.to_append_iff
/-- The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself."]
theorem nil_iff : Red [] L ↔ L = [] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => Red.not_step_nil
#align free_group.red.nil_iff FreeGroup.Red.nil_iff
#align free_add_group.red.nil_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.nil_iff
/-- A letter only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "A letter only reduces to itself."]
theorem singleton_iff {x} : Red [x] L₁ ↔ L₁ = [x] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => not_step_singleton
#align free_group.red.singleton_iff FreeGroup.Red.singleton_iff
#align free_add_group.red.singleton_iff FreeAddGroup.Red.singleton_iff
/-- If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `xw` reduces to the empty word, then `w` reduces
to `x⁻¹` -/
@[to_additive
"If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `x + w` reduces to the empty word, then `w`
reduces to `-x`."]
theorem cons_nil_iff_singleton {x b} : Red ((x, b) :: L) [] ↔ Red L [(x, not b)] :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
have h₁ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) [(x, not b)] := cons_cons h
have h₂ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) L := ReflTransGen.single Step.cons_not_rev
let ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩ := church_rosser h₁ h₂
rw [singleton_iff] at h₁
subst L'
assumption)
fun h => (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not
#align free_group.red.cons_nil_iff_singleton FreeGroup.Red.cons_nil_iff_singleton
#align free_add_group.red.cons_nil_iff_singleton FreeAddGroup.Red.cons_nil_iff_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem red_iff_irreducible {x1 b1 x2 b2} (h : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2)) :
Red [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] L ↔ L = [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] := by
apply reflTransGen_iff_eq
generalize eq : [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] = L'
intro L h'
cases h'
simp [List.cons_eq_append, List.nil_eq_append] at eq
rcases eq with ⟨rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
simp at h
#align free_group.red.red_iff_irreducible FreeGroup.Red.red_iff_irreducible
#align free_add_group.red.red_iff_irreducible FreeAddGroup.Red.red_iff_irreducible
/-- If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `xw₁` reduces to `yw₂`, then
`w₁` reduces to `x⁻¹yw₂`. -/
@[to_additive "If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `x + w₁` reduces
to `y + w₂`, then `w₁` reduces to `-x + y + w₂`."]
theorem inv_of_red_of_ne {x1 b1 x2 b2} (H1 : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2))
(H2 : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ((x2, b2) :: L₂)) : Red L₁ ((x1, not b1) :: (x2, b2) :: L₂) := by
have : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ([(x2, b2)] ++ L₂) := H2
rcases to_append_iff.1 this with ⟨_ | ⟨p, L₃⟩, L₄, eq, h₁, h₂⟩
· simp [nil_iff] at h₁
· cases eq
show Red (L₃ ++ L₄) ([(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] ++ L₂)
apply append_append _ h₂
have h₁ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] := cons_cons h₁
have h₂ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) L₃ := Step.cons_not_rev.to_red
rcases church_rosser h₁ h₂ with ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩
rw [red_iff_irreducible H1] at h₁
rwa [h₁] at h₂
#align free_group.red.inv_of_red_of_ne FreeGroup.Red.inv_of_red_of_ne
#align free_add_group.red.neg_of_red_of_ne FreeAddGroup.Red.neg_of_red_of_ne
open List -- for <+ notation
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeGroup/Basic.lean | 377 | 378 | theorem Step.sublist (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Sublist L₂ L₁ := by |
cases H; simp; constructor; constructor; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
#align_import algebra.group.ext from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e574b1a4e891376b0ef974b926da39e05da12a06"
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for monoid and group structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for `Monoid` and higher algebraic structures with one
binary operation. Extensionality lemmas for structures that are lower in the hierarchy can be found
in `Algebra.Group.Defs`.
## Implementation details
To get equality of `npow` etc, we define a monoid homomorphism between two monoid structures on the
same type, then apply lemmas like `MonoidHom.map_div`, `MonoidHom.map_pow` etc.
To refer to the `*` operator of a particular instance `i`, we use
`(letI := i; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)` instead of `i.mul` (which elaborates to `Mul.mul`), as the
former uses `HMul.hMul` which is the canonical spelling.
## Tags
monoid, group, extensionality
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem Monoid.ext {M : Type u} ⦃m₁ m₂ : Monoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ := by
have : m₁.toMulOneClass = m₂.toMulOneClass := MulOneClass.ext h_mul
have h₁ : m₁.one = m₂.one := congr_arg (·.one) this
let f : @MonoidHom M M m₁.toMulOneClass m₂.toMulOneClass :=
@MonoidHom.mk _ _ (_) _ (@OneHom.mk _ _ (_) _ id h₁)
(fun x y => congr_fun (congr_fun h_mul x) y)
have : m₁.npow = m₂.npow := by
ext n x
exact @MonoidHom.map_pow M M m₁ m₂ f x n
rcases m₁ with @⟨@⟨⟨_⟩⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
rcases m₂ with @⟨@⟨⟨_⟩⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
congr
#align monoid.ext Monoid.ext
#align add_monoid.ext AddMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem CommMonoid.toMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@CommMonoid.toMonoid M) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ h
congr
#align comm_monoid.to_monoid_injective CommMonoid.toMonoid_injective
#align add_comm_monoid.to_add_monoid_injective AddCommMonoid.toAddMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem CommMonoid.ext {M : Type*} ⦃m₁ m₂ : CommMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) : m₁ = m₂ :=
CommMonoid.toMonoid_injective <| Monoid.ext h_mul
#align comm_monoid.ext CommMonoid.ext
#align add_comm_monoid.ext AddCommMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid M) := by
rintro @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ h
congr <;> injection h
#align left_cancel_monoid.to_monoid_injective LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective
#align add_left_cancel_monoid.to_add_monoid_injective AddLeftCancelMonoid.toAddMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem LeftCancelMonoid.ext {M : Type u} ⦃m₁ m₂ : LeftCancelMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ :=
LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective <| Monoid.ext h_mul
#align left_cancel_monoid.ext LeftCancelMonoid.ext
#align add_left_cancel_monoid.ext AddLeftCancelMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean | 87 | 90 | theorem RightCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@RightCancelMonoid.toMonoid M) := by |
rintro @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ h
congr <;> injection h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.type from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47adfab39a11a072db552f47594bf8ed2cf8a722"
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
namespace Equiv.Perm
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type Equiv.Perm.cycleType
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_def Equiv.Perm.cycleType_def
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq' Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq'
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, (· ∘ ·)]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq_zero Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq_zero
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_one Equiv.Perm.cycleType_one
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 87 | 88 | theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by |
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.nat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file deals with prime numbers: natural numbers `p ≥ 2` whose only divisors are `p` and `1`.
## Important declarations
- `Nat.Prime`: the predicate that expresses that a natural number `p` is prime
- `Nat.Primes`: the subtype of natural numbers that are prime
- `Nat.minFac n`: the minimal prime factor of a natural number `n ≠ 1`
- `Nat.exists_infinite_primes`: Euclid's theorem that there exist infinitely many prime numbers.
This also appears as `Nat.not_bddAbove_setOf_prime` and `Nat.infinite_setOf_prime` (the latter
in `Data.Nat.PrimeFin`).
- `Nat.prime_iff`: `Nat.Prime` coincides with the general definition of `Prime`
- `Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime`: a non-unit natural number is
only divisible by `1` iff it is prime
-/
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- `Nat.Prime p` means that `p` is a prime number, that is, a natural number
at least 2 whose only divisors are `p` and `1`. -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed @[pp_nodot]
def Prime (p : ℕ) :=
Irreducible p
#align nat.prime Nat.Prime
theorem irreducible_iff_nat_prime (a : ℕ) : Irreducible a ↔ Nat.Prime a :=
Iff.rfl
#align irreducible_iff_nat_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime 0
| h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align nat.not_prime_zero Nat.not_prime_zero
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime 1
| h => h.ne_one rfl
#align nat.not_prime_one Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : Prime n) : n ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero h
#align nat.prime.ne_zero Nat.Prime.ne_zero
theorem Prime.pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < p :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.pos Nat.Prime.pos
theorem Prime.two_le : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Prime p → 2 ≤ p
| 0, h => (not_prime_zero h).elim
| 1, h => (not_prime_one h).elim
| _ + 2, _ => le_add_self
#align nat.prime.two_le Nat.Prime.two_le
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p → 1 < p :=
Prime.two_le
#align nat.prime.one_lt Nat.Prime.one_lt
lemma Prime.one_le {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : 1 ≤ p := hp.one_lt.le
instance Prime.one_lt' (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (1 < p) :=
⟨hp.1.one_lt⟩
#align nat.prime.one_lt' Nat.Prime.one_lt'
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : p ≠ 1 :=
hp.one_lt.ne'
#align nat.prime.ne_one Nat.Prime.ne_one
theorem Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (m : ℕ) (hm : m ∣ p) :
m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hm
have := pp.isUnit_or_isUnit hn
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff] at this
apply Or.imp_right _ this
rintro rfl
rw [hn, mul_one]
#align nat.prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd
theorem prime_def_lt'' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.two_le, h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: needed to make ℕ explicit
have h1 := (@one_lt_two ℕ ..).trans_le h.1
refine ⟨mt Nat.isUnit_iff.mp h1.ne', fun a b hab => ?_⟩
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff]
apply Or.imp_right _ (h.2 a _)
· rintro rfl
rw [← mul_right_inj' (pos_of_gt h1).ne', ← hab, mul_one]
· rw [hab]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align nat.prime_def_lt'' Nat.prime_def_lt''
theorem prime_def_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m < p, m ∣ p → m = 1 :=
prime_def_lt''.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun h l d => (h d).resolve_right (ne_of_lt l), fun h d =>
(le_of_dvd (le_of_succ_le p2) d).lt_or_eq_dec.imp_left fun l => h l d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt Nat.prime_def_lt
theorem prime_def_lt' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m < p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun m =>
⟨fun h m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge m2 ((h l d).symm ▸ by decide), fun h l d => by
rcases m with (_ | _ | m)
· rw [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd d] at p2
revert p2
decide
· rfl
· exact (h le_add_self l).elim d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt' Nat.prime_def_lt'
theorem prime_def_le_sqrt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ≤ sqrt p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt'.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
⟨fun a m m2 l => a m m2 <| lt_of_le_of_lt l <| sqrt_lt_self p2, fun a =>
have : ∀ {m k : ℕ}, m ≤ k → 1 < m → p ≠ m * k := fun {m k} mk m1 e =>
a m m1 (le_sqrt.2 (e.symm ▸ Nat.mul_le_mul_left m mk)) ⟨k, e⟩
fun m m2 l ⟨k, e⟩ => by
rcases le_total m k with mk | km
· exact this mk m2 e
· rw [mul_comm] at e
refine this km (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ (zero_le m)) e
rwa [one_mul, ← e]⟩
#align nat.prime_def_le_sqrt Nat.prime_def_le_sqrt
theorem prime_of_coprime (n : ℕ) (h1 : 1 < n) (h : ∀ m < n, m ≠ 0 → n.Coprime m) : Prime n := by
refine prime_def_lt.mpr ⟨h1, fun m mlt mdvd => ?_⟩
have hm : m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at mdvd
exact mlt.ne' mdvd
exact (h m mlt hm).symm.eq_one_of_dvd mdvd
#align nat.prime_of_coprime Nat.prime_of_coprime
section
/-- This instance is slower than the instance `decidablePrime` defined below,
but has the advantage that it works in the kernel for small values.
If you need to prove that a particular number is prime, in any case
you should not use `by decide`, but rather `by norm_num`, which is
much faster.
-/
@[local instance]
def decidablePrime1 (p : ℕ) : Decidable (Prime p) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ prime_def_lt'
#align nat.decidable_prime_1 Nat.decidablePrime1
theorem prime_two : Prime 2 := by decide
#align nat.prime_two Nat.prime_two
theorem prime_three : Prime 3 := by decide
#align nat.prime_three Nat.prime_three
theorem prime_five : Prime 5 := by decide
theorem Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h_two : p ≠ 2)
(h_three : p ≠ 3) : 5 ≤ p := by
by_contra! h
revert h_two h_three hp
-- Porting note (#11043): was `decide!`
match p with
| 0 => decide
| 1 => decide
| 2 => decide
| 3 => decide
| 4 => decide
| n + 5 => exact (h.not_le le_add_self).elim
#align nat.prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three Nat.Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three
end
theorem Prime.pred_pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < pred p :=
lt_pred_iff.2 pp.one_lt
#align nat.prime.pred_pos Nat.Prime.pred_pos
theorem succ_pred_prime {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : succ (pred p) = p :=
succ_pred_eq_of_pos pp.pos
#align nat.succ_pred_prime Nat.succ_pred_prime
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p :=
⟨fun d => pp.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd m d, fun h =>
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ one_dvd _) fun e => e.symm ▸ dvd_rfl⟩
#align nat.dvd_prime Nat.dvd_prime
theorem dvd_prime_two_le {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (H : 2 ≤ m) : m ∣ p ↔ m = p :=
(dvd_prime pp).trans <| or_iff_right_of_imp <| Not.elim <| ne_of_gt H
#align nat.dvd_prime_two_le Nat.dvd_prime_two_le
theorem prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq {p q : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (qp : q.Prime) : p ∣ q ↔ p = q :=
dvd_prime_two_le qp (Prime.two_le pp)
#align nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq Nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
Irreducible.not_dvd_one pp
#align nat.prime.not_dvd_one Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem prime_mul_iff {a b : ℕ} : Nat.Prime (a * b) ↔ a.Prime ∧ b = 1 ∨ b.Prime ∧ a = 1 := by
simp only [iff_self_iff, irreducible_mul_iff, ← irreducible_iff_nat_prime, Nat.isUnit_iff]
#align nat.prime_mul_iff Nat.prime_mul_iff
theorem not_prime_mul {a b : ℕ} (a1 : a ≠ 1) (b1 : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a * b) := by
simp [prime_mul_iff, _root_.not_or, *]
#align nat.not_prime_mul Nat.not_prime_mul
theorem not_prime_mul' {a b n : ℕ} (h : a * b = n) (h₁ : a ≠ 1) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime n :=
h ▸ not_prime_mul h₁ h₂
#align nat.not_prime_mul' Nat.not_prime_mul'
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_eq {p a : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (a1 : a ≠ 1) : a ∣ p ↔ p = a := by
refine ⟨?_, by rintro rfl; rfl⟩
rintro ⟨j, rfl⟩
rcases prime_mul_iff.mp hp with (⟨_, rfl⟩ | ⟨_, rfl⟩)
· exact mul_one _
· exact (a1 rfl).elim
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_eq Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_eq
section MinFac
theorem minFac_lemma (n k : ℕ) (h : ¬n < k * k) : sqrt n - k < sqrt n + 2 - k :=
(tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right <| le_sqrt.2 <| le_of_not_gt h).2 <| Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (by decide)
#align nat.min_fac_lemma Nat.minFac_lemma
/--
If `n < k * k`, then `minFacAux n k = n`, if `k | n`, then `minFacAux n k = k`.
Otherwise, `minFacAux n k = minFacAux n (k+2)` using well-founded recursion.
If `n` is odd and `1 < n`, then `minFacAux n 3` is the smallest prime factor of `n`.
By default this well-founded recursion would be irreducible.
This prevents use `decide` to resolve `Nat.prime n` for small values of `n`,
so we mark this as `@[semireducible]`.
In future, we may want to remove this annotation and instead use `norm_num` instead of `decide`
in these situations.
-/
@[semireducible] def minFacAux (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| k =>
if n < k * k then n
else
if k ∣ n then k
else
minFacAux n (k + 2)
termination_by k => sqrt n + 2 - k
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply minFac_lemma n k; assumption
#align nat.min_fac_aux Nat.minFacAux
/-- Returns the smallest prime factor of `n ≠ 1`. -/
def minFac (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if 2 ∣ n then 2 else minFacAux n 3
#align nat.min_fac Nat.minFac
@[simp]
theorem minFac_zero : minFac 0 = 2 :=
rfl
#align nat.min_fac_zero Nat.minFac_zero
@[simp]
theorem minFac_one : minFac 1 = 1 := by
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
#align nat.min_fac_one Nat.minFac_one
@[simp]
theorem minFac_two : minFac 2 = 2 := by
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
theorem minFac_eq (n : ℕ) : minFac n = if 2 ∣ n then 2 else minFacAux n 3 := rfl
#align nat.min_fac_eq Nat.minFac_eq
private def minFacProp (n k : ℕ) :=
2 ≤ k ∧ k ∣ n ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m
theorem minFacAux_has_prop {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) :
∀ k i, k = 2 * i + 3 → (∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m) → minFacProp n (minFacAux n k)
| k => fun i e a => by
rw [minFacAux]
by_cases h : n < k * k <;> simp [h]
· have pp : Prime n :=
prime_def_le_sqrt.2
⟨n2, fun m m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge l <| lt_of_lt_of_le (sqrt_lt.2 h) (a m m2 d)⟩
exact ⟨n2, dvd_rfl, fun m m2 d => le_of_eq ((dvd_prime_two_le pp m2).1 d).symm⟩
have k2 : 2 ≤ k := by
subst e
apply Nat.le_add_left
by_cases dk : k ∣ n <;> simp [dk]
· exact ⟨k2, dk, a⟩
· refine
have := minFac_lemma n k h
minFacAux_has_prop n2 (k + 2) (i + 1) (by simp [k, e, left_distrib, add_right_comm])
fun m m2 d => ?_
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (a m m2 d) with me | ml
· subst me
contradiction
apply (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ml).resolve_left
intro me
rw [← me, e] at d
have d' : 2 * (i + 2) ∣ n := d
have := a _ le_rfl (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd d')
rw [e] at this
exact absurd this (by contradiction)
termination_by k => sqrt n + 2 - k
#align nat.min_fac_aux_has_prop Nat.minFacAux_has_prop
theorem minFac_has_prop {n : ℕ} (n1 : n ≠ 1) : minFacProp n (minFac n) := by
by_cases n0 : n = 0
· simp [n0, minFacProp, GE.ge]
have n2 : 2 ≤ n := by
revert n0 n1
rcases n with (_ | _ | _) <;> simp [succ_le_succ]
simp only [minFac_eq, Nat.isUnit_iff]
by_cases d2 : 2 ∣ n <;> simp [d2]
· exact ⟨le_rfl, d2, fun k k2 _ => k2⟩
· refine
minFacAux_has_prop n2 3 0 rfl fun m m2 d => (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le m2).resolve_left (mt ?_ d2)
exact fun e => e.symm ▸ d
#align nat.min_fac_has_prop Nat.minFac_has_prop
theorem minFac_dvd (n : ℕ) : minFac n ∣ n :=
if n1 : n = 1 then by simp [n1] else (minFac_has_prop n1).2.1
#align nat.min_fac_dvd Nat.minFac_dvd
theorem minFac_prime {n : ℕ} (n1 : n ≠ 1) : Prime (minFac n) :=
let ⟨f2, fd, a⟩ := minFac_has_prop n1
prime_def_lt'.2 ⟨f2, fun m m2 l d => not_le_of_gt l (a m m2 (d.trans fd))⟩
#align nat.min_fac_prime Nat.minFac_prime
theorem minFac_le_of_dvd {n : ℕ} : ∀ {m : ℕ}, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → minFac n ≤ m := by
by_cases n1 : n = 1 <;> [exact fun m2 _ => n1.symm ▸ le_trans (by simp) m2;
apply (minFac_has_prop n1).2.2]
#align nat.min_fac_le_of_dvd Nat.minFac_le_of_dvd
theorem minFac_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < minFac n := by
by_cases n1 : n = 1 <;> [exact n1.symm ▸ (by simp); exact (minFac_prime n1).pos]
#align nat.min_fac_pos Nat.minFac_pos
theorem minFac_le {n : ℕ} (H : 0 < n) : minFac n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd H (minFac_dvd n)
#align nat.min_fac_le Nat.minFac_le
theorem le_minFac {m n : ℕ} : n = 1 ∨ m ≤ minFac n ↔ ∀ p, Prime p → p ∣ n → m ≤ p :=
⟨fun h p pp d =>
h.elim (by rintro rfl; cases pp.not_dvd_one d) fun h =>
le_trans h <| minFac_le_of_dvd pp.two_le d,
fun H => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun n1 => H _ (minFac_prime n1) (minFac_dvd _)⟩
#align nat.le_min_fac Nat.le_minFac
theorem le_minFac' {m n : ℕ} : n = 1 ∨ m ≤ minFac n ↔ ∀ p, 2 ≤ p → p ∣ n → m ≤ p :=
⟨fun h p (pp : 1 < p) d =>
h.elim (by rintro rfl; cases not_le_of_lt pp (le_of_dvd (by decide) d)) fun h =>
le_trans h <| minFac_le_of_dvd pp d,
fun H => le_minFac.2 fun p pp d => H p pp.two_le d⟩
#align nat.le_min_fac' Nat.le_minFac'
theorem prime_def_minFac {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ minFac p = p :=
⟨fun pp =>
⟨pp.two_le,
let ⟨f2, fd, _⟩ := minFac_has_prop <| ne_of_gt pp.one_lt
((dvd_prime pp).1 fd).resolve_left (ne_of_gt f2)⟩,
fun ⟨p2, e⟩ => e ▸ minFac_prime (ne_of_gt p2)⟩
#align nat.prime_def_min_fac Nat.prime_def_minFac
@[simp]
theorem Prime.minFac_eq {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : minFac p = p :=
(prime_def_minFac.1 hp).2
#align nat.prime.min_fac_eq Nat.Prime.minFac_eq
/-- This instance is faster in the virtual machine than `decidablePrime1`,
but slower in the kernel.
If you need to prove that a particular number is prime, in any case
you should not use `by decide`, but rather `by norm_num`, which is
much faster.
-/
instance decidablePrime (p : ℕ) : Decidable (Prime p) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ prime_def_minFac
#align nat.decidable_prime Nat.decidablePrime
theorem not_prime_iff_minFac_lt {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) : ¬Prime n ↔ minFac n < n :=
(not_congr <| prime_def_minFac.trans <| and_iff_right n2).trans <|
(lt_iff_le_and_ne.trans <| and_iff_right <| minFac_le <| le_of_succ_le n2).symm
#align nat.not_prime_iff_min_fac_lt Nat.not_prime_iff_minFac_lt
theorem minFac_le_div {n : ℕ} (pos : 0 < n) (np : ¬Prime n) : minFac n ≤ n / minFac n :=
match minFac_dvd n with
| ⟨0, h0⟩ => absurd pos <| by rw [h0, mul_zero]; decide
| ⟨1, h1⟩ => by
rw [mul_one] at h1
rw [prime_def_minFac, not_and_or, ← h1, eq_self_iff_true, _root_.not_true, or_false_iff,
not_le] at np
rw [le_antisymm (le_of_lt_succ np) (succ_le_of_lt pos), minFac_one, Nat.div_one]
| ⟨x + 2, hx⟩ => by
conv_rhs =>
congr
rw [hx]
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (minFac_pos _)]
exact minFac_le_of_dvd (le_add_left 2 x) ⟨minFac n, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
#align nat.min_fac_le_div Nat.minFac_le_div
/-- The square of the smallest prime factor of a composite number `n` is at most `n`.
-/
theorem minFac_sq_le_self {n : ℕ} (w : 0 < n) (h : ¬Prime n) : minFac n ^ 2 ≤ n :=
have t : minFac n ≤ n / minFac n := minFac_le_div w h
calc
minFac n ^ 2 = minFac n * minFac n := sq (minFac n)
_ ≤ n / minFac n * minFac n := Nat.mul_le_mul_right (minFac n) t
_ ≤ n := div_mul_le_self n (minFac n)
#align nat.min_fac_sq_le_self Nat.minFac_sq_le_self
@[simp]
theorem minFac_eq_one_iff {n : ℕ} : minFac n = 1 ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hn
have := minFac_prime hn
rw [h] at this
exact not_prime_one this
· rintro rfl
rfl
#align nat.min_fac_eq_one_iff Nat.minFac_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem minFac_eq_two_iff (n : ℕ) : minFac n = 2 ↔ 2 ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact minFac_dvd n
· intro h
have ub := minFac_le_of_dvd (le_refl 2) h
have lb := minFac_pos n
refine ub.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h' => ?_
have := le_antisymm (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lb) (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h')
rw [eq_comm, Nat.minFac_eq_one_iff] at this
subst this
exact not_lt_of_le (le_of_dvd zero_lt_one h) one_lt_two
#align nat.min_fac_eq_two_iff Nat.minFac_eq_two_iff
end MinFac
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) (np : ¬Prime n) : ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_dvd _, ne_of_gt (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt n2)).one_lt,
ne_of_lt <| (not_prime_iff_minFac_lt n2).1 np⟩
#align nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime Nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) (np : ¬Prime n) :
∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ 2 ≤ m ∧ m < n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_dvd _, (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt n2)).two_le,
(not_prime_iff_minFac_lt n2).1 np⟩
#align nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 Nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime2
theorem not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (h1 : m ∣ n) (h2 : m ≠ 1) (h3 : m ≠ n) : ¬Prime n :=
fun h => Or.elim (h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd m h1) h2 h3
theorem not_prime_of_dvd_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (h1 : m ∣ n) (h2 : 2 ≤ m) (h3 : m < n) : ¬Prime n :=
not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne h1 (ne_of_gt h2) (ne_of_lt h3)
theorem not_prime_iff_exists_dvd_ne {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : (¬Prime n) ↔ ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n :=
⟨exists_dvd_of_not_prime h, fun ⟨_, h1, h2, h3⟩ => not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne h1 h2 h3⟩
theorem not_prime_iff_exists_dvd_lt {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : (¬Prime n) ↔ ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ 2 ≤ m ∧ m < n :=
⟨exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 h, fun ⟨_, h1, h2, h3⟩ => not_prime_of_dvd_of_lt h1 h2 h3⟩
theorem exists_prime_and_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ∃ p, Prime p ∧ p ∣ n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_prime hn, minFac_dvd _⟩
#align nat.exists_prime_and_dvd Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd
theorem dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd {a b : ℕ}
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ a → p * a ∣ b) : a ∣ b := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 1
· apply one_dvd
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_prime_and_dvd ha
exact _root_.trans (dvd_mul_left a p) (hdvd p hp.1 hp.2)
#align nat.dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd Nat.dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
/-- Euclid's theorem on the **infinitude of primes**.
Here given in the form: for every `n`, there exists a prime number `p ≥ n`. -/
theorem exists_infinite_primes (n : ℕ) : ∃ p, n ≤ p ∧ Prime p :=
let p := minFac (n ! + 1)
have f1 : n ! + 1 ≠ 1 := ne_of_gt <| succ_lt_succ <| factorial_pos _
have pp : Prime p := minFac_prime f1
have np : n ≤ p :=
le_of_not_ge fun h =>
have h₁ : p ∣ n ! := dvd_factorial (minFac_pos _) h
have h₂ : p ∣ 1 := (Nat.dvd_add_iff_right h₁).2 (minFac_dvd _)
pp.not_dvd_one h₂
⟨p, np, pp⟩
#align nat.exists_infinite_primes Nat.exists_infinite_primes
/-- A version of `Nat.exists_infinite_primes` using the `BddAbove` predicate. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Prime.lean | 509 | 513 | theorem not_bddAbove_setOf_prime : ¬BddAbove { p | Prime p } := by |
rw [not_bddAbove_iff]
intro n
obtain ⟨p, hi, hp⟩ := exists_infinite_primes n.succ
exact ⟨p, hp, hi⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import group_theory.subgroup.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
/-!
# Subgroups
This file defines multiplicative and additive subgroups as an extension of submonoids, in a bundled
form (unbundled subgroups are in `Deprecated/Subgroups.lean`).
We prove subgroups of a group form a complete lattice, and results about images and preimages of
subgroups under group homomorphisms. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid homomorphisms.
There are also theorems about the subgroups generated by an element or a subset of a group,
defined both inductively and as the infimum of the set of subgroups containing a given
element/subset.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup G` : the type of subgroups of a group `G`
* `AddSubgroup A` : the type of subgroups of an additive group `A`
* `CompleteLattice (Subgroup G)` : the subgroups of `G` form a complete lattice
* `Subgroup.closure k` : the minimal subgroup that includes the set `k`
* `Subgroup.subtype` : the natural group homomorphism from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`
* `Subgroup.gi` : `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set
* `Subgroup.comap H f` : the preimage of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.map f H` : the image of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
* `MonoidHom.range f` : the range of the group homomorphism `f` is a subgroup
* `MonoidHom.ker f` : the kernel of a group homomorphism `f` is the subgroup of elements `x : G`
such that `f x = 1`
* `MonoidHom.eq_locus f g` : given group homomorphisms `f`, `g`, the elements of `G` such that
`f x = g x` form a subgroup of `G`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
open Function
open Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
/-- `InvMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under inverses. -/
class InvMemClass (S G : Type*) [Inv G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s
#align inv_mem_class InvMemClass
export InvMemClass (inv_mem)
/-- `NegMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under negation. -/
class NegMemClass (S G : Type*) [Neg G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → -x ∈ s
#align neg_mem_class NegMemClass
export NegMemClass (neg_mem)
/-- `SubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are subgroups of `G`. -/
class SubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends SubmonoidClass S G,
InvMemClass S G : Prop
#align subgroup_class SubgroupClass
/-- `AddSubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are
additive subgroups of `G`. -/
class AddSubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [SubNegMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends AddSubmonoidClass S G,
NegMemClass S G : Prop
#align add_subgroup_class AddSubgroupClass
attribute [to_additive] InvMemClass SubgroupClass
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] inv_mem neg_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mem_iff {S G} [InvolutiveInv G] {_ : SetLike S G} [InvMemClass S G] {H : S}
{x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ inv_mem h, inv_mem⟩
#align inv_mem_iff inv_mem_iff
#align neg_mem_iff neg_mem_iff
@[simp] theorem abs_mem_iff {S G} [AddGroup G] [LinearOrder G] {_ : SetLike S G}
[NegMemClass S G] {H : S} {x : G} : |x| ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H := by
cases abs_choice x <;> simp [*]
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"An additive subgroup is closed under subtraction."]
theorem div_mem {x y : M} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact mul_mem hx (inv_mem hy)
#align div_mem div_mem
#align sub_mem sub_mem
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))]
theorem zpow_mem {x : M} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K
| (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact pow_mem hx n
| -[n+1] => by
rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact inv_mem (pow_mem hx n.succ)
#align zpow_mem zpow_mem
#align zsmul_mem zsmul_mem
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
#align div_mem_comm_iff div_mem_comm_iff
#align sub_mem_comm_iff sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive /-(attr := simp)-/] -- Porting note: `simp` cannot simplify LHS
theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ H ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, P x := by
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, inv_mem x_in, by simp [hx]⟩
#align exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hba => by simpa using mul_mem hba (inv_mem h), fun hb => mul_mem hb h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_right mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_mem_cancel_right add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hab => by simpa using mul_mem (inv_mem h) hab, mul_mem h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_left mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_mem_cancel_left add_mem_cancel_left
namespace InvMemClass
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [Inv G] [SetLike S G]
[InvMemClass S G] {H : S} : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_inv InvMemClass.inv
#align add_subgroup_class.has_neg NegMemClass.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : (x⁻¹).1 = x.1⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_inv InvMemClass.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_neg NegMemClass.coe_neg
end InvMemClass
namespace SubgroupClass
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-15"))] alias coe_inv := InvMemClass.coe_inv
-- Here we assume H, K, and L are subgroups, but in fact any one of them
-- could be allowed to be a subsemigroup.
-- Counterexample where K and L are submonoids: H = ℤ, K = ℕ, L = -ℕ
-- Counterexample where H and K are submonoids: H = {n | n = 0 ∨ 3 ≤ n}, K = 3ℕ + 4ℕ, L = 5ℤ
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_union {H K L : S} : (H : Set G) ⊆ K ∪ L ↔ H ≤ K ∨ H ≤ L := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h x xH ↦ h.imp (· xH) (· xH)⟩
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists]
exact fun ⟨x, xH, xK⟩ y yH ↦ (h <| mul_mem xH yH).elim
((h yH).resolve_left fun yK ↦ xK <| (mul_mem_cancel_right yK).mp ·)
(mul_mem_cancel_left <| (h xH).resolve_left xK).mp
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G]
[SubgroupClass S G] {H : S} : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_div SubgroupClass.div
#align add_subgroup_class.has_sub AddSubgroupClass.sub
/-- An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroupClass.zsmul {M S} [SubNegMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a.1, zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup_class.has_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power. -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow {M S} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [SubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a.1 ^ n, zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_zpow SubgroupClass.zpow
-- Porting note: additive align statement is given above
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (x / y).1 = x.1 / y.1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_div SubgroupClass.coe_div
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_sub AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub
variable (H)
-- Prefer subclasses of `Group` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance (priority := 75) toGroup : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_group SubgroupClass.toGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddGroup
-- Prefer subclasses of `CommGroup` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance (priority := 75) toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] :
CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_comm_group SubgroupClass.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"The natural group hom from an additive subgroup of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.subtype SubgroupClass.subtype
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype AddSubgroupClass.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : (SubgroupClass.subtype H : H → G) = ((↑) : H → G) := by
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_subtype SubgroupClass.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_subtype AddSubgroupClass.coeSubtype
variable {H}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_pow SubgroupClass.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_smul AddSubgroupClass.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_zpow SubgroupClass.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.coe_zsmul
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : S} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.prop⟩) fun _ _=> rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion AddSubgroupClass.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_self (x : H) : inclusion le_rfl x = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_self SubgroupClass.inclusion_self
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_self AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_mk {h : H ≤ K} (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = ⟨x, h hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_mk SubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_mk AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_right (h : H ≤ K) (x : K) (hx : (x : G) ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_right SubgroupClass.inclusion_right
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_right AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_right
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_inclusion {L : S} (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) (x : H) :
inclusion hKL (inclusion hHK x) = inclusion (hHK.trans hKL) x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : S} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup_class.coe_inclusion SubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : S} (hH : H ≤ K) :
(SubgroupClass.subtype K).comp (inclusion hH) = SubgroupClass.subtype H := by
ext
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, coeSubtype, coe_inclusion]
#align subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion SubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
end SubgroupClass
end SubgroupClass
/-- A subgroup of a group `G` is a subset containing 1, closed under multiplication
and closed under multiplicative inverse. -/
structure Subgroup (G : Type*) [Group G] extends Submonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align subgroup Subgroup
/-- An additive subgroup of an additive group `G` is a subset containing 0, closed
under addition and additive inverse. -/
structure AddSubgroup (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddSubmonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → -x ∈ carrier
#align add_subgroup AddSubgroup
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup
-- Porting note: Removed, translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid] Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `Subgroup` as a `Submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subgroup.toSubmonoid
#align subgroup.to_submonoid Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret an `AddSubgroup` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (Subgroup G) G where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hp,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := p
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hq,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := q
congr
-- Porting note: Below can probably be written more uniformly
@[to_additive]
instance : SubgroupClass (Subgroup G) G where
inv_mem := Subgroup.inv_mem' _
one_mem _ := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).one_mem'
mul_mem := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).mul_mem'
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_carrier Subgroup.mem_carrier
#align add_subgroup.mem_carrier AddSubgroup.mem_carrier
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mk {s : Set G} {x : G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
x ∈ mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_mk Subgroup.mem_mk
#align add_subgroup.mem_mk AddSubgroup.mem_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_set_mk {s : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
(mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_set_mk Subgroup.coe_set_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_set_mk AddSubgroup.coe_set_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_le_mk {s t : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) (h_one') (h_mul') (h_inv') :
mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ≤ mk ⟨⟨t, h_one'⟩, h_mul'⟩ h_inv' ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mk_le_mk Subgroup.mk_le_mk
#align add_subgroup.mk_le_mk AddSubgroup.mk_le_mk
initialize_simps_projections Subgroup (carrier → coe)
initialize_simps_projections AddSubgroup (carrier → coe)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) : (K.toSubmonoid : Set G) = K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_to_submonoid Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.coe_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.coe_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) (x : G) : x ∈ K.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_to_submonoid Subgroup.mem_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.mem_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.mem_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
-- fun p q h => SetLike.ext'_iff.2 (show _ from SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h)
fun p q h => by
have := SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h
rw [coe_toSubmonoid, coe_toSubmonoid] at this
exact SetLike.ext'_iff.2 this
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_injective Subgroup.toSubmonoid_injective
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_injective AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_eq {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid = q.toSubmonoid ↔ p = q :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_eq Subgroup.toSubmonoid_eq
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_eq AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_eq
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) := fun _ _ =>
id
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_strictMono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_mono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_mono
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_le {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid ≤ q.toSubmonoid ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_le Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_le AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_nonempty (s : Subgroup G) : (s : Set G).Nonempty := ⟨1, one_mem _⟩
end Subgroup
/-!
### Conversion to/from `Additive`/`Multiplicative`
-/
section mul_add
/-- Subgroups of a group `G` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `Additive G`. -/
@[simps!]
def Subgroup.toAddSubgroup : Subgroup G ≃o AddSubgroup (Additive G) where
toFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
invFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup Subgroup.toAddSubgroup
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_apply_coe
/-- Additive subgroup of an additive group `Additive G` are isomorphic to subgroup of `G`. -/
abbrev AddSubgroup.toSubgroup' : AddSubgroup (Additive G) ≃o Subgroup G :=
Subgroup.toAddSubgroup.symm
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup' AddSubgroup.toSubgroup'
/-- Additive subgroups of an additive group `A` are isomorphic to subgroups of `Multiplicative A`.
-/
@[simps!]
def AddSubgroup.toSubgroup : AddSubgroup A ≃o Subgroup (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
invFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup AddSubgroup.toSubgroup
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
/-- Subgroups of an additive group `Multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `A`.
-/
abbrev Subgroup.toAddSubgroup' : Subgroup (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubgroup A :=
AddSubgroup.toSubgroup.symm
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup' Subgroup.toAddSubgroup'
end mul_add
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
/-- Copy of a subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an additive subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities"]
protected def copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = K) : Subgroup G where
carrier := s
one_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.one_mem'
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.mul_mem'
inv_mem' hx := by simpa [hs] using hx -- Porting note: `▸` didn't work here
#align subgroup.copy Subgroup.copy
#align add_subgroup.copy AddSubgroup.copy
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : (K.copy s hs : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_copy Subgroup.coe_copy
#align add_subgroup.coe_copy AddSubgroup.coe_copy
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : K.copy s hs = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subgroup.copy_eq Subgroup.copy_eq
#align add_subgroup.copy_eq AddSubgroup.copy_eq
/-- Two subgroups are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two `AddSubgroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {H K : Subgroup G} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ H ↔ x ∈ K) : H = K :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subgroup.ext Subgroup.ext
#align add_subgroup.ext AddSubgroup.ext
/-- A subgroup contains the group's 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` contains the group's 0."]
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ H :=
one_mem _
#align subgroup.one_mem Subgroup.one_mem
#align add_subgroup.zero_mem AddSubgroup.zero_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under addition."]
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : G} : x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H :=
mul_mem
#align subgroup.mul_mem Subgroup.mul_mem
#align add_subgroup.add_mem AddSubgroup.add_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under inverse."]
protected theorem inv_mem {x : G} : x ∈ H → x⁻¹ ∈ H :=
inv_mem
#align subgroup.inv_mem Subgroup.inv_mem
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem AddSubgroup.neg_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under subtraction."]
protected theorem div_mem {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H :=
div_mem hx hy
#align subgroup.div_mem Subgroup.div_mem
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem AddSubgroup.sub_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_mem_iff {x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
inv_mem_iff
#align subgroup.inv_mem_iff Subgroup.inv_mem_iff
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem_iff AddSubgroup.neg_mem_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
#align subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff Subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff AddSubgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem (K : Subgroup G) {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ K ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, P x :=
exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem Subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align add_subgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem AddSubgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_right h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_right AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_left h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_left AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem pow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
pow_mem hx
#align subgroup.pow_mem Subgroup.pow_mem
#align add_subgroup.nsmul_mem AddSubgroup.nsmul_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem zpow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
zpow_mem hx
#align subgroup.zpow_mem Subgroup.zpow_mem
#align add_subgroup.zsmul_mem AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem
/-- Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under subtraction"]
def ofDiv (s : Set G) (hsn : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x * y⁻¹ ∈ s) :
Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s := by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hsn
simpa using hs x hx x hx
have inv_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s := fun x hx => by simpa using hs 1 one_mem x hx
{ carrier := s
one_mem' := one_mem
inv_mem' := inv_mem _
mul_mem' := fun hx hy => by simpa using hs _ hx _ (inv_mem _ hy) }
#align subgroup.of_div Subgroup.ofDiv
#align add_subgroup.of_sub AddSubgroup.ofSub
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an addition."]
instance mul : Mul H :=
H.toSubmonoid.mul
#align subgroup.has_mul Subgroup.mul
#align add_subgroup.has_add AddSubgroup.add
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a zero."]
instance one : One H :=
H.toSubmonoid.one
#align subgroup.has_one Subgroup.one
#align add_subgroup.has_zero AddSubgroup.zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, H.inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_inv Subgroup.inv
#align add_subgroup.has_neg AddSubgroup.neg
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, H.div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_div Subgroup.div
#align add_subgroup.has_sub AddSubgroup.sub
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a natural scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.nsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℕ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.nsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_nsmul AddSubgroup.nsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a natural power -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected instance npow : Pow H ℕ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.pow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_npow Subgroup.npow
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.zsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_zsmul AddSubgroup.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_zpow Subgroup.zpow
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul (x y : H) : (↑(x * y) : G) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mul Subgroup.coe_mul
#align add_subgroup.coe_add AddSubgroup.coe_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : H) : G) = 1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_one Subgroup.coe_one
#align add_subgroup.coe_zero AddSubgroup.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : ↑(x⁻¹ : H) = (x⁻¹ : G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inv Subgroup.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup.coe_neg AddSubgroup.coe_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (↑(x / y) : G) = ↑x / ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_div Subgroup.coe_div
#align add_subgroup.coe_sub AddSubgroup.coe_sub
-- Porting note: removed simp, theorem has variable as head symbol
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mk (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : ((⟨x, hx⟩ : H) : G) = x :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mk Subgroup.coe_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_mk AddSubgroup.coe_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_pow Subgroup.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup.coe_nsmul AddSubgroup.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_zpow Subgroup.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup.coe_zsmul AddSubgroup.coe_zsmul
@[to_additive] -- This can be proved by `Submonoid.mk_eq_one`
theorem mk_eq_one {g : G} {h} : (⟨g, h⟩ : H) = 1 ↔ g = 1 := by simp
#align subgroup.mk_eq_one_iff Subgroup.mk_eq_one
#align add_subgroup.mk_eq_zero_iff AddSubgroup.mk_eq_zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance toGroup {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_group Subgroup.toGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_group AddSubgroup.toAddGroup
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (H : Subgroup G) : CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_comm_group Subgroup.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroup.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural group hom from an `AddSubgroup` of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align subgroup.subtype Subgroup.subtype
#align add_subgroup.subtype AddSubgroup.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : ⇑ H.subtype = ((↑) : H → G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_subtype Subgroup.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup.coe_subtype AddSubgroup.coeSubtype
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_injective : Function.Injective (Subgroup.subtype H) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.subtype_injective Subgroup.subtype_injective
#align add_subgroup.subtype_injective AddSubgroup.subtype_injective
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.2⟩) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.inclusion Subgroup.inclusion
#align add_subgroup.inclusion AddSubgroup.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, coe_mk, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup.coe_inclusion Subgroup.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.coe_inclusion AddSubgroup.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_injective {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : Function.Injective <| inclusion h :=
Set.inclusion_injective h
#align subgroup.inclusion_injective Subgroup.inclusion_injective
#align add_subgroup.inclusion_injective AddSubgroup.inclusion_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : H ≤ K) :
K.subtype.comp (inclusion hH) = H.subtype :=
rfl
#align subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion Subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
/-- The subgroup `G` of the group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup G` of the `AddGroup G`."]
instance : Top (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := fun _ => Set.mem_univ _ }⟩
/-- The top subgroup is isomorphic to the group.
This is the group version of `Submonoid.topEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!)
"The top additive subgroup is isomorphic to the additive group.
This is the additive group version of `AddSubmonoid.topEquiv`."]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgroup G) ≃* G :=
Submonoid.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv Subgroup.topEquiv
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv AddSubgroup.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_apply AddSubgroup.topEquiv_apply
/-- The trivial subgroup `{1}` of a group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial `AddSubgroup` `{0}` of an `AddGroup` `G`."]
instance : Bot (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := by simp}⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_bot {x : G} : x ∈ (⊥ : Subgroup G) ↔ x = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_bot Subgroup.mem_bot
#align add_subgroup.mem_bot AddSubgroup.mem_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_top (x : G) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subgroup.mem_top Subgroup.mem_top
#align add_subgroup.mem_top AddSubgroup.mem_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_top Subgroup.coe_top
#align add_subgroup.coe_top AddSubgroup.coe_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = {1} :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_bot Subgroup.coe_bot
#align add_subgroup.coe_bot AddSubgroup.coe_bot
@[to_additive]
instance : Unique (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨1⟩, fun g => Subtype.ext g.2⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_toSubmonoid : (⊤ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.top_to_submonoid Subgroup.top_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.top_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.top_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_toSubmonoid : (⊥ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.bot_to_submonoid Subgroup.bot_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.bot_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.bot_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_iff_forall : H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ H, x = (1 : G) :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff.symm.trans <| Submonoid.eq_bot_iff_forall _
#align subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall AddSubgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton H] : H = ⊥ := by
rw [Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall]
intro y hy
rw [← Subgroup.coe_mk H y hy, Subsingleton.elim (⟨y, hy⟩ : H) 1, Subgroup.coe_one]
#align subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton Subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton AddSubgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_eq_univ {H : Subgroup G} : (H : Set G) = Set.univ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
(SetLike.ext'_iff.trans (by rfl)).symm
#align subgroup.coe_eq_univ Subgroup.coe_eq_univ
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_univ AddSubgroup.coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {H : Subgroup G} : (∃ g : G, (H : Set G) = {g}) ↔ H = ⊥ :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hg⟩ =>
haveI : Subsingleton (H : Set G) := by
rw [hg]
infer_instance
H.eq_bot_of_subsingleton,
fun h => ⟨1, SetLike.ext'_iff.mp h⟩⟩
#align subgroup.coe_eq_singleton Subgroup.coe_eq_singleton
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_singleton AddSubgroup.coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
rw [Subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (fun x => x ∈ H) (1 : H)]
simp
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) [Nontrivial H] :
∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ 1 := by
rwa [← Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ H ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one, ne_eq, eq_bot_iff_forall]
simp only [ne_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial."]
theorem bot_or_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ Nontrivial H := by
have := nontrivial_iff_ne_bot H
tauto
#align subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial Subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial AddSubgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a non-identity element. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a nonzero element."]
theorem bot_or_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
convert H.bot_or_nontrivial
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
#align subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one Subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
lemma ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one {H : Subgroup G} : H ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ a : ↥H, a ≠ 1 := by
rw [← nontrivial_iff_ne_bot, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
simp only [ne_eq, Subtype.exists, mk_eq_one, exists_prop]
/-- The inf of two subgroups is their intersection. -/
@[to_additive "The inf of two `AddSubgroup`s is their intersection."]
instance : Inf (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun H₁ H₂ =>
{ H₁.toSubmonoid ⊓ H₂.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun ⟨hx, hx'⟩ => ⟨H₁.inv_mem hx, H₂.inv_mem hx'⟩ }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subgroup G) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subgroup G) : Set G) = (p : Set G) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inf Subgroup.coe_inf
#align add_subgroup.coe_inf AddSubgroup.coe_inf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_inf Subgroup.mem_inf
#align add_subgroup.mem_inf AddSubgroup.mem_inf
@[to_additive]
instance : InfSet (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ (⨅ S ∈ s, Subgroup.toSubmonoid S).copy (⋂ S ∈ s, ↑S) (by simp) with
inv_mem' := fun {x} hx =>
Set.mem_biInter fun i h => i.inv_mem (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hx i h) }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_sInf (H : Set (Subgroup G)) : ((sInf H : Subgroup G) : Set G) = ⋂ s ∈ H, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_Inf Subgroup.coe_sInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_Inf AddSubgroup.coe_sInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {x : G} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subgroup.mem_Inf Subgroup.mem_sInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_Inf AddSubgroup.mem_sInf
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} {x : G} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align subgroup.mem_infi Subgroup.mem_iInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_infi AddSubgroup.mem_iInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set G) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
#align subgroup.coe_infi Subgroup.coe_iInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_infi AddSubgroup.coe_iInf
/-- Subgroups of a group form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup`s of an `AddGroup` form a complete lattice."]
instance : CompleteLattice (Subgroup G) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subgroup G) fun _s =>
IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun S _x hx => (mem_bot.1 hx).symm ▸ S.one_mem
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _S x _hx => mem_top x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _a _b _c ha hb _x hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _a _b _x => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _a _b _x => And.right }
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : S ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_left; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_left Subgroup.mem_sup_left
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_left AddSubgroup.mem_sup_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : T ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_right; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_right Subgroup.mem_sup_right
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_right AddSubgroup.mem_sup_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : Subgroup G} {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) : x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
(S ⊔ T).mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
#align subgroup.mul_mem_sup Subgroup.mul_mem_sup
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_sup AddSubgroup.add_mem_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ iSup S :=
have : S i ≤ iSup S := le_iSup _ _; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem Subgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sSup_of_mem {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {s : Subgroup G} (hs : s ∈ S) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ s → x ∈ sSup S :=
have : s ≤ sSup S := le_sSup hs; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem Subgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (Subgroup G) ↔ Subsingleton G :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨fun x y =>
have : ∀ i : G, i = 1 := fun i =>
mem_bot.mp <| Subsingleton.elim (⊤ : Subgroup G) ⊥ ▸ mem_top i
(this x).trans (this y).symm⟩,
fun h => ⟨fun x y => Subgroup.ext fun i => Subsingleton.elim 1 i ▸ by simp [Subgroup.one_mem]⟩⟩
#align subgroup.subsingleton_iff Subgroup.subsingleton_iff
#align add_subgroup.subsingleton_iff AddSubgroup.subsingleton_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) ↔ Nontrivial G :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff Subgroup.nontrivial_iff
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff
@[to_additive]
instance [Subsingleton G] : Unique (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨⊥⟩, fun a => @Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_iff.mpr ‹_›) a _⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [Nontrivial G] : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) :=
nontrivial_iff.mpr ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_top_iff' : H = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : G, x ∈ H :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align subgroup.eq_top_iff' Subgroup.eq_top_iff'
#align add_subgroup.eq_top_iff' AddSubgroup.eq_top_iff'
/-- The `Subgroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (k : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
sInf { K | k ⊆ K }
#align subgroup.closure Subgroup.closure
#align add_subgroup.closure AddSubgroup.closure
variable {k : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure {x : G} : x ∈ closure k ↔ ∀ K : Subgroup G, k ⊆ K → x ∈ K :=
mem_sInf
#align subgroup.mem_closure Subgroup.mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure AddSubgroup.mem_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
theorem subset_closure : k ⊆ closure k := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hK => hK hx
#align subgroup.subset_closure Subgroup.subset_closure
#align add_subgroup.subset_closure AddSubgroup.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : G} (hP : P ∉ closure k) : P ∉ k := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure Subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure AddSubgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
open Set
/-- A subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"An additive subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`"]
theorem closure_le : closure k ≤ K ↔ k ⊆ K :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align subgroup.closure_le Subgroup.closure_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_le AddSubgroup.closure_le
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : k ⊆ K) (h₂ : K ≤ closure k) : closure k = K :=
le_antisymm ((closure_le <| K).2 h₁) h₂
#align subgroup.closure_eq_of_le Subgroup.closure_eq_of_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_of_le AddSubgroup.closure_eq_of_le
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of `k`, and
is preserved under multiplication and inverse, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure
of `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p`
holds for `0` and all elements of `k`, and is preserved under addition and inverses, then `p`
holds for all elements of the additive closure of `k`."]
theorem closure_induction {p : G → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure k) (mem : ∀ x ∈ k, p x) (one : p 1)
(mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (inv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ ⟨⟨⟨setOf p, fun {x y} ↦ mul x y⟩, one⟩, fun {x} ↦ inv x⟩ k).2 mem h
#align subgroup.closure_induction Subgroup.closure_induction
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction AddSubgroup.closure_induction
/-- A dependent version of `Subgroup.closure_induction`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "A dependent version of `AddSubgroup.closure_induction`. "]
theorem closure_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure k → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ k), p x (subset_closure h)) (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(inv : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p x⁻¹ (inv_mem hx)) {x} (hx : x ∈ closure k) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hc : p x hx) => hc
exact
closure_induction hx (fun x hx => ⟨_, mem x hx⟩) ⟨_, one⟩
(fun x y ⟨hx', hx⟩ ⟨hy', hy⟩ => ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩) fun x ⟨hx', hx⟩ => ⟨_, inv _ _ hx⟩
#align subgroup.closure_induction' Subgroup.closure_induction'
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction' AddSubgroup.closure_induction'
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership, for
predicates with two arguments."]
theorem closure_induction₂ {p : G → G → Prop} {x} {y : G} (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hy : y ∈ closure k)
(Hk : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, p x y) (H1_left : ∀ x, p 1 x) (H1_right : ∀ x, p x 1)
(Hmul_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ * x₂) y)
(Hmul_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ * y₂)) (Hinv_left : ∀ x y, p x y → p x⁻¹ y)
(Hinv_right : ∀ x y, p x y → p x y⁻¹) : p x y :=
closure_induction hx
(fun x xk => closure_induction hy (Hk x xk) (H1_right x) (Hmul_right x) (Hinv_right x))
(H1_left y) (fun z z' => Hmul_left z z' y) fun z => Hinv_left z y
#align subgroup.closure_induction₂ Subgroup.closure_induction₂
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction₂ AddSubgroup.closure_induction₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_closure_coe_preimage {k : Set G} : closure (((↑) : closure k → G) ⁻¹' k) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x =>
Subtype.recOn x fun x hx _ => by
refine closure_induction' (fun g hg => ?_) ?_ (fun g₁ g₂ hg₁ hg₂ => ?_) (fun g hg => ?_) hx
· exact subset_closure hg
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem
· exact inv_mem
#align subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage Subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
#align add_subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage AddSubgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
/-- If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is a commutative group. -/
@[to_additive
"If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is an additive
commutative group."]
def closureCommGroupOfComm {k : Set G} (hcomm : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, x * y = y * x) :
CommGroup (closure k) :=
{ (closure k).toGroup with
mul_comm := fun x y => by
ext
simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul]
refine
closure_induction₂ x.prop y.prop hcomm (fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc])
(fun x y h => by
rw [inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one])
fun x y h => by
rw [mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_assoc, h, ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_self, one_mul] }
#align subgroup.closure_comm_group_of_comm Subgroup.closureCommGroupOfComm
#align add_subgroup.closure_add_comm_group_of_comm AddSubgroup.closureAddCommGroupOfComm
variable (G)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure G _) (↑) where
choice s _ := closure s
gc s t := @closure_le _ _ t s
le_l_u _s := subset_closure
choice_eq _s _h := rfl
#align subgroup.gi Subgroup.gi
#align add_subgroup.gi AddSubgroup.gi
variable {G}
/-- Subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`. -/
@[to_additive
"Additive subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`"]
theorem closure_mono ⦃h k : Set G⦄ (h' : h ⊆ k) : closure h ≤ closure k :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.monotone_l h'
#align subgroup.closure_mono Subgroup.closure_mono
#align add_subgroup.closure_mono AddSubgroup.closure_mono
/-- Closure of a subgroup `K` equals `K`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Additive closure of an additive subgroup `K` equals `K`"]
theorem closure_eq : closure (K : Set G) = K :=
(Subgroup.gi G).l_u_eq K
#align subgroup.closure_eq Subgroup.closure_eq
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq AddSubgroup.closure_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set G) = ⊥ :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_bot
#align subgroup.closure_empty Subgroup.closure_empty
#align add_subgroup.closure_empty AddSubgroup.closure_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set G) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top G _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
#align subgroup.closure_univ Subgroup.closure_univ
#align add_subgroup.closure_univ AddSubgroup.closure_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_union (s t : Set G) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_sup
#align subgroup.closure_union Subgroup.closure_union
#align add_subgroup.closure_union AddSubgroup.closure_union
@[to_additive]
theorem sup_eq_closure (H H' : Subgroup G) : H ⊔ H' = closure ((H : Set G) ∪ (H' : Set G)) := by
simp_rw [closure_union, closure_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set G) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_iSup
#align subgroup.closure_Union Subgroup.closure_iUnion
#align add_subgroup.closure_Union AddSubgroup.closure_iUnion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_eq_bot_iff : closure k = ⊥ ↔ k ⊆ {1} := le_bot_iff.symm.trans <| closure_le _
#align subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_eq_closure {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subgroup G) :
⨆ i, p i = closure (⋃ i, (p i : Set G)) := by simp_rw [closure_iUnion, closure_eq]
#align subgroup.supr_eq_closure Subgroup.iSup_eq_closure
#align add_subgroup.supr_eq_closure AddSubgroup.iSup_eq_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by an element of a group equals the set of integer number powers of
the element. -/
@[to_additive
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by an element of an `AddGroup` equals the set of
natural number multiples of the element."]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,265 | 1,276 | theorem mem_closure_singleton {x y : G} : y ∈ closure ({x} : Set G) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x ^ n = y := by |
refine
⟨fun hy => closure_induction hy ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
hn ▸ zpow_mem (subset_closure <| mem_singleton x) n⟩
· intro y hy
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton hy]
exact ⟨1, zpow_one x⟩
· exact ⟨0, zpow_zero x⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n + m, zpow_add x n m⟩
rintro _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨-n, zpow_neg x n⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import topology.metric_space.pi_nat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"49b7f94aab3a3bdca1f9f34c5d818afb253b3993"
/-!
# Topological study of spaces `Π (n : ℕ), E n`
When `E n` are topological spaces, the space `Π (n : ℕ), E n` is naturally a topological space
(with the product topology). When `E n` are uniform spaces, it also inherits a uniform structure.
However, it does not inherit a canonical metric space structure of the `E n`. Nevertheless, one
can put a noncanonical metric space structure (or rather, several of them). This is done in this
file.
## Main definitions and results
One can define a combinatorial distance on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, as follows:
* `PiNat.cylinder x n` is the set of points `y` with `x i = y i` for `i < n`.
* `PiNat.firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x i ≠ y i`.
* `PiNat.dist x y` is equal to `(1/2) ^ (firstDiff x y)`. It defines a distance
on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, compatible with the topology when the `E n` have the discrete topology.
* `PiNat.metricSpace`: the metric space structure, given by this distance. Not registered as an
instance. This space is a complete metric space.
* `PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity`: the same metric space structure, but adjusting the
uniformity defeqness when the `E n` already have the discrete uniformity. Not registered as an
instance
* `PiNat.metricSpaceNatNat`: the particular case of `ℕ → ℕ`, not registered as an instance.
These results are used to construct continuous functions on `Π n, E n`:
* `PiNat.exists_retraction_of_isClosed`: given a nonempty closed subset `s` of `Π (n : ℕ), E n`,
there exists a retraction onto `s`, i.e., a continuous map from the whole space to `s`
restricting to the identity on `s`.
* `exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective_of_completeSpace`: given any nonempty complete metric
space with second-countable topology, there exists a continuous surjection from `ℕ → ℕ` onto
this space.
One can also put distances on `Π (i : ι), E i` when the spaces `E i` are metric spaces (not discrete
in general), and `ι` is countable.
* `PiCountable.dist` is the distance on `Π i, E i` given by
`dist x y = ∑' i, min (1/2)^(encode i) (dist (x i) (y i))`.
* `PiCountable.metricSpace` is the corresponding metric space structure, adjusted so that
the uniformity is definitionally the product uniformity. Not registered as an instance.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right one_lt_two inv_le_inv zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
/-! ### The firstDiff function -/
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, then `firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x` and `y`
differ. If `x = y`, then by convention we set `firstDiff x x = 0`. -/
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
#align pi_nat.first_diff PiNat.firstDiff
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
#align pi_nat.apply_first_diff_ne PiNat.apply_firstDiff_ne
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
#align pi_nat.apply_eq_of_lt_first_diff PiNat.apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
#align pi_nat.first_diff_comm PiNat.firstDiff_comm
theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
#align pi_nat.min_first_diff_le PiNat.min_firstDiff_le
/-! ### Cylinders -/
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, the cylinder set of length `n` around `x`, denoted
`cylinder x n`, is the set of sequences `y` that coincide with `x` on the first `n` symbols, i.e.,
such that `y i = x i` for all `i < n`.
-/
def cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : Set (∀ n, E n) :=
{ y | ∀ i, i < n → y i = x i }
#align pi_nat.cylinder PiNat.cylinder
theorem cylinder_eq_pi (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = Set.pi (Finset.range n : Set ℕ) fun i : ℕ => {x i} := by
ext y
simp [cylinder]
#align pi_nat.cylinder_eq_pi PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_zero (x : ∀ n, E n) : cylinder x 0 = univ := by simp [cylinder_eq_pi]
#align pi_nat.cylinder_zero PiNat.cylinder_zero
theorem cylinder_anti (x : ∀ n, E n) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : cylinder x n ⊆ cylinder x m :=
fun _y hy i hi => hy i (hi.trans_le h)
#align pi_nat.cylinder_anti PiNat.cylinder_anti
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ ∀ i < n, y i = x i :=
Iff.rfl
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff
theorem self_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : x ∈ cylinder x n := by simp
#align pi_nat.self_mem_cylinder PiNat.self_mem_cylinder
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_eq {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ cylinder y n = cylinder x n := by
constructor
· intro hy
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro z hz i hi
rw [← hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro z hz i hi
rw [hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact self_mem_cylinder _ _
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_eq PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_eq
theorem mem_cylinder_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ x ∈ cylinder y n := by
simp [mem_cylinder_iff_eq, eq_comm]
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_comm PiNat.mem_cylinder_comm
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} (hne : x ≠ y) (i : ℕ) :
x ∈ cylinder y i ↔ i ≤ firstDiff x y := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra!
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (h _ this)
· intro hi j hj
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hj.trans_le hi)
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_le_first_diff PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff
theorem mem_cylinder_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : x ∈ cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := fun _i hi =>
apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff hi
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_first_diff PiNat.mem_cylinder_firstDiff
theorem cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ firstDiff x y) :
cylinder x n = cylinder y n := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
intro i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le hn)
#align pi_nat.cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_first_diff PiNat.cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff
theorem iUnion_cylinder_update (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
⋃ k, cylinder (update x n k) (n + 1) = cylinder x n := by
ext y
simp only [mem_cylinder_iff, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ i hi
simpa [hi.ne] using hk i (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
refine ⟨y n, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rcases Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi with (h'i | rfl)
· simp [H i h'i, h'i.ne]
· simp
#align pi_nat.Union_cylinder_update PiNat.iUnion_cylinder_update
theorem update_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) (y : E n) : update x n y ∈ cylinder x n :=
mem_cylinder_iff.2 fun i hi => by simp [hi.ne]
#align pi_nat.update_mem_cylinder PiNat.update_mem_cylinder
section Res
variable {α : Type*}
open List
/-- In the case where `E` has constant value `α`,
the cylinder `cylinder x n` can be identified with the element of `List α`
consisting of the first `n` entries of `x`. See `cylinder_eq_res`.
We call this list `res x n`, the restriction of `x` to `n`. -/
def res (x : ℕ → α) : ℕ → List α
| 0 => nil
| Nat.succ n => x n :: res x n
#align pi_nat.res PiNat.res
@[simp]
theorem res_zero (x : ℕ → α) : res x 0 = @nil α :=
rfl
#align pi_nat.res_zero PiNat.res_zero
@[simp]
theorem res_succ (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : res x n.succ = x n :: res x n :=
rfl
#align pi_nat.res_succ PiNat.res_succ
@[simp]
theorem res_length (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : (res x n).length = n := by induction n <;> simp [*]
#align pi_nat.res_length PiNat.res_length
/-- The restrictions of `x` and `y` to `n` are equal if and only if `x m = y m` for all `m < n`. -/
theorem res_eq_res {x y : ℕ → α} {n : ℕ} :
res x n = res y n ↔ ∀ ⦃m⦄, m < n → x m = y m := by
constructor <;> intro h <;> induction' n with n ih; · simp
· intro m hm
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq] at h
cases' hm with hm hm
· exact ih h.2 hm
rw [hm]
exact h.1
· simp
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq]
refine ⟨h (Nat.lt_succ_self _), ih fun m hm => ?_⟩
exact h (hm.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
#align pi_nat.res_eq_res PiNat.res_eq_res
theorem res_injective : Injective (@res α) := by
intro x y h
ext n
apply res_eq_res.mp _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
rw [h]
#align pi_nat.res_injective PiNat.res_injective
/-- `cylinder x n` is equal to the set of sequences `y` with the same restriction to `n` as `x`. -/
theorem cylinder_eq_res (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = { y | res y n = res x n } := by
ext y
dsimp [cylinder]
rw [res_eq_res]
#align pi_nat.cylinder_eq_res PiNat.cylinder_eq_res
end Res
/-!
### A distance function on `Π n, E n`
We define a distance function on `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is the first
index at which `x` and `y` differ. When each `E n` has the discrete topology, this distance will
define the right topology on the product space. We do not record a global `Dist` instance nor
a `MetricSpace` instance, as other distances may be used on these spaces, but we register them as
local instances in this section.
-/
/-- The distance function on a product space `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is
the first index at which `x` and `y` differ. -/
protected def dist : Dist (∀ n, E n) :=
⟨fun x y => if x ≠ y then (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y else 0⟩
#align pi_nat.has_dist PiNat.dist
attribute [local instance] PiNat.dist
theorem dist_eq_of_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) : dist x y = (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y := by
simp [dist, h]
#align pi_nat.dist_eq_of_ne PiNat.dist_eq_of_ne
protected theorem dist_self (x : ∀ n, E n) : dist x x = 0 := by simp [dist]
#align pi_nat.dist_self PiNat.dist_self
protected theorem dist_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : dist x y = dist y x := by
simp [dist, @eq_comm _ x y, firstDiff_comm]
#align pi_nat.dist_comm PiNat.dist_comm
protected theorem dist_nonneg (x y : ∀ n, E n) : 0 ≤ dist x y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp [dist]
· simp [dist, h, zero_le_two]
#align pi_nat.dist_nonneg PiNat.dist_nonneg
theorem dist_triangle_nonarch (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x z with (rfl | hxz)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self x, PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hxy)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y z with (rfl | hyz)
· simp
simp only [dist_eq_of_ne, hxz, hxy, hyz, inv_le_inv, one_div, inv_pow, zero_lt_two, Ne,
not_false_iff, le_max_iff, pow_le_pow_iff_right, one_lt_two, pow_pos,
min_le_iff.1 (min_firstDiff_le x y z hxz)]
#align pi_nat.dist_triangle_nonarch PiNat.dist_triangle_nonarch
protected theorem dist_triangle (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
calc
dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := dist_triangle_nonarch x y z
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z := max_le_add_of_nonneg (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _) (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _)
#align pi_nat.dist_triangle PiNat.dist_triangle
protected theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero (x y : ∀ n, E n) (hxy : dist x y = 0) : x = y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h); · rfl
simp [dist_eq_of_ne h] at hxy
#align pi_nat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ dist y x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self]
suffices (∀ i : ℕ, i < n → y i = x i) ↔ n ≤ firstDiff y x by simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
constructor
· intro hy
by_contra! H
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (hy _ H)
· intro h i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le h)
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le
theorem apply_eq_of_dist_lt {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (h : dist x y < (1 / 2) ^ n) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i ≤ n) : x i = y i := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· rfl
have : n < firstDiff x y := by
simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne, inv_lt_inv, pow_lt_pow_iff_right, one_lt_two] using h
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_lt this)
#align pi_nat.apply_eq_of_dist_lt PiNat.apply_eq_of_dist_lt
/-- A function to a pseudo-metric-space is `1`-Lipschitz if and only if points in the same cylinder
of length `n` are sent to points within distance `(1/2)^n`.
Not expressed using `LipschitzWith` as we don't have a metric space structure -/
theorem lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder {α : Type*}
[PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : (∀ n, E n) → α} :
(∀ x y : ∀ n, E n, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) ↔
∀ x y n, y ∈ cylinder x n → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
constructor
· intro H x y n hxy
apply (H x y).trans
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hxy
· intro H x y
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rw [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
apply H x y (firstDiff x y)
rw [firstDiff_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_firstDiff _ _
#align pi_nat.lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder PiNat.lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder
variable (E)
variable [∀ n, TopologicalSpace (E n)] [∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n)]
theorem isOpen_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : IsOpen (cylinder x n) := by
rw [PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi]
exact isOpen_set_pi (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun a _ => isOpen_discrete _
#align pi_nat.is_open_cylinder PiNat.isOpen_cylinder
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 365 | 385 | theorem isTopologicalBasis_cylinders :
IsTopologicalBasis { s : Set (∀ n, E n) | ∃ (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n } := by |
apply isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro u ⟨x, n, rfl⟩
apply isOpen_cylinder
· intro x u hx u_open
obtain ⟨v, ⟨U, F, -, rfl⟩, xU, Uu⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { S : Set (∀ i : ℕ, E i) | ∃ (U : ∀ i : ℕ, Set (E i)) (F : Finset ℕ),
(∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → U i ∈ { s : Set (E i) | IsOpen s }) ∧ S = (F : Set ℕ).pi U },
x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
(isTopologicalBasis_pi fun n : ℕ => isTopologicalBasis_opens).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx
u_open
rcases Finset.bddAbove F with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨cylinder x (n + 1), ⟨x, n + 1, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder _ _, Subset.trans ?_ Uu⟩
intro y hy
suffices ∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → y i ∈ U i by simpa
intro i hi
have : y i = x i := mem_cylinder_iff.1 hy i ((hn hi).trans_lt (lt_add_one n))
rw [this]
simp only [Set.mem_pi, Finset.mem_coe] at xU
exact xU i hi
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.category from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g: X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:max => (MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit : C)
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Used to ensure that `𝟙_` notation is used, as the ascription makes this not automatic. -/
@[delab app.CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit]
def delabTensorUnit : Delab := whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 3 do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit 3
let C ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(𝟙_ $C)
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g: X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Composition of tensor products is tensor product of compositions:
`(f₁ ⊗ g₁) ∘ (f₂ ⊗ g₂) = (f₁ ∘ f₂) ⊗ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monoidal_category CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.left_unitor_conjugation CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerLeft
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.right_unitor_conjugation CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.whiskerRight_id
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
end MonoidalCategory
open scoped MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
namespace MonoidalCategory
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 302 | 304 | theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by |
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalities
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.WithLp
/-!
# `L^p` distance on products of two metric spaces
Given two metric spaces, one can put the max distance on their product, but there is also
a whole family of natural distances, indexed by a parameter `p : ℝ≥0∞`, that also induce
the product topology. We define them in this file. For `0 < p < ∞`, the distance on `α × β`
is given by
$$
d(x, y) = \left(d(x_1, y_1)^p + d(x_2, y_2)^p\right)^{1/p}.
$$
For `p = ∞` the distance is the supremum of the distances and `p = 0` the distance is the
cardinality of the elements that are not equal.
We give instances of this construction for emetric spaces, metric spaces, normed groups and normed
spaces.
To avoid conflicting instances, all these are defined on a copy of the original Prod-type, named
`WithLp p (α × β)`. The assumption `[Fact (1 ≤ p)]` is required for the metric and normed space
instances.
We ensure that the topology, bornology and uniform structure on `WithLp p (α × β)` are (defeq to)
the product topology, product bornology and product uniformity, to be able to use freely continuity
statements for the coordinate functions, for instance.
# Implementation notes
This files is a straight-forward adaption of `Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.PiLp`.
-/
open Real Set Filter RCLike Bornology Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
variable (p : ℝ≥0∞) (𝕜 α β : Type*)
namespace WithLp
section algebra
/- Register simplification lemmas for the applications of `WithLp p (α × β)` elements, as the usual
lemmas for `Prod` will not trigger. -/
variable {p 𝕜 α β}
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommGroup α] [AddCommGroup β]
variable (x y : WithLp p (α × β)) (c : 𝕜)
@[simp]
theorem zero_fst : (0 : WithLp p (α × β)).fst = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_snd : (0 : WithLp p (α × β)).snd = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_fst : (x + y).fst = x.fst + y.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_snd : (x + y).snd = x.snd + y.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_fst : (x - y).fst = x.fst - y.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_snd : (x - y).snd = x.snd - y.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_fst : (-x).fst = -x.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_snd : (-x).snd = -x.snd :=
rfl
variable [Module 𝕜 α] [Module 𝕜 β]
@[simp]
theorem smul_fst : (c • x).fst = c • x.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_snd : (c • x).snd = c • x.snd :=
rfl
end algebra
/-! Note that the unapplied versions of these lemmas are deliberately omitted, as they break
the use of the type synonym. -/
section equiv
variable {p α β}
@[simp]
theorem equiv_fst (x : WithLp p (α × β)) : (WithLp.equiv p (α × β) x).fst = x.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equiv_snd (x : WithLp p (α × β)) : (WithLp.equiv p (α × β) x).snd = x.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equiv_symm_fst (x : α × β) : ((WithLp.equiv p (α × β)).symm x).fst = x.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equiv_symm_snd (x : α × β) : ((WithLp.equiv p (α × β)).symm x).snd = x.snd :=
rfl
end equiv
section DistNorm
/-!
### Definition of `edist`, `dist` and `norm` on `WithLp p (α × β)`
In this section we define the `edist`, `dist` and `norm` functions on `WithLp p (α × β)` without
assuming `[Fact (1 ≤ p)]` or metric properties of the spaces `α` and `β`. This allows us to provide
the rewrite lemmas for each of three cases `p = 0`, `p = ∞` and `0 < p.toReal`.
-/
section EDist
variable [EDist α] [EDist β]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Endowing the space `WithLp p (α × β)` with the `L^p` edistance. We register this instance
separate from `WithLp.instProdPseudoEMetric` since the latter requires the type class hypothesis
`[Fact (1 ≤ p)]` in order to prove the triangle inequality.
Registering this separately allows for a future emetric-like structure on `WithLp p (α × β)` for
`p < 1` satisfying a relaxed triangle inequality. The terminology for this varies throughout the
literature, but it is sometimes called a *quasi-metric* or *semi-metric*. -/
instance instProdEDist : EDist (WithLp p (α × β)) where
edist f g :=
if _hp : p = 0 then
(if edist f.fst g.fst = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if edist f.snd g.snd = 0 then 0 else 1)
else if p = ∞ then
edist f.fst g.fst ⊔ edist f.snd g.snd
else
(edist f.fst g.fst ^ p.toReal + edist f.snd g.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal)
variable {p α β}
variable (x y : WithLp p (α × β)) (x' : α × β)
@[simp]
theorem prod_edist_eq_card (f g : WithLp 0 (α × β)) :
edist f g =
(if edist f.fst g.fst = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if edist f.snd g.snd = 0 then 0 else 1) := by
convert if_pos rfl
theorem prod_edist_eq_add (hp : 0 < p.toReal) (f g : WithLp p (α × β)) :
edist f g = (edist f.fst g.fst ^ p.toReal + edist f.snd g.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
let hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff.mp hp
(if_neg hp'.1.ne').trans (if_neg hp'.2.ne)
theorem prod_edist_eq_sup (f g : WithLp ∞ (α × β)) :
edist f g = edist f.fst g.fst ⊔ edist f.snd g.snd := by
dsimp [edist]
exact if_neg ENNReal.top_ne_zero
end EDist
section EDistProp
variable {α β}
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
/-- The distance from one point to itself is always zero.
This holds independent of `p` and does not require `[Fact (1 ≤ p)]`. We keep it separate
from `WithLp.instProdPseudoEMetricSpace` so it can be used also for `p < 1`. -/
theorem prod_edist_self (f : WithLp p (α × β)) : edist f f = 0 := by
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | h)
· classical
simp
· simp [prod_edist_eq_sup]
· simp [prod_edist_eq_add h, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos h,
ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos (inv_pos.2 <| h)]
/-- The distance is symmetric.
This holds independent of `p` and does not require `[Fact (1 ≤ p)]`. We keep it separate
from `WithLp.instProdPseudoEMetricSpace` so it can be used also for `p < 1`. -/
theorem prod_edist_comm (f g : WithLp p (α × β)) : edist f g = edist g f := by
classical
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | h)
· simp only [prod_edist_eq_card, edist_comm]
· simp only [prod_edist_eq_sup, edist_comm]
· simp only [prod_edist_eq_add h, edist_comm]
end EDistProp
section Dist
variable [Dist α] [Dist β]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Endowing the space `WithLp p (α × β)` with the `L^p` distance. We register this instance
separate from `WithLp.instProdPseudoMetricSpace` since the latter requires the type class hypothesis
`[Fact (1 ≤ p)]` in order to prove the triangle inequality.
Registering this separately allows for a future metric-like structure on `WithLp p (α × β)` for
`p < 1` satisfying a relaxed triangle inequality. The terminology for this varies throughout the
literature, but it is sometimes called a *quasi-metric* or *semi-metric*. -/
instance instProdDist : Dist (WithLp p (α × β)) where
dist f g :=
if _hp : p = 0 then
(if dist f.fst g.fst = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if dist f.snd g.snd = 0 then 0 else 1)
else if p = ∞ then
dist f.fst g.fst ⊔ dist f.snd g.snd
else
(dist f.fst g.fst ^ p.toReal + dist f.snd g.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal)
variable {p α β}
theorem prod_dist_eq_card (f g : WithLp 0 (α × β)) : dist f g =
(if dist f.fst g.fst = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if dist f.snd g.snd = 0 then 0 else 1) := by
convert if_pos rfl
theorem prod_dist_eq_add (hp : 0 < p.toReal) (f g : WithLp p (α × β)) :
dist f g = (dist f.fst g.fst ^ p.toReal + dist f.snd g.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
let hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff.mp hp
(if_neg hp'.1.ne').trans (if_neg hp'.2.ne)
theorem prod_dist_eq_sup (f g : WithLp ∞ (α × β)) :
dist f g = dist f.fst g.fst ⊔ dist f.snd g.snd := by
dsimp [dist]
exact if_neg ENNReal.top_ne_zero
end Dist
section Norm
variable [Norm α] [Norm β]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Endowing the space `WithLp p (α × β)` with the `L^p` norm. We register this instance
separate from `WithLp.instProdSeminormedAddCommGroup` since the latter requires the type class
hypothesis `[Fact (1 ≤ p)]` in order to prove the triangle inequality.
Registering this separately allows for a future norm-like structure on `WithLp p (α × β)` for
`p < 1` satisfying a relaxed triangle inequality. These are called *quasi-norms*. -/
instance instProdNorm : Norm (WithLp p (α × β)) where
norm f :=
if _hp : p = 0 then
(if ‖f.fst‖ = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if ‖f.snd‖ = 0 then 0 else 1)
else if p = ∞ then
‖f.fst‖ ⊔ ‖f.snd‖
else
(‖f.fst‖ ^ p.toReal + ‖f.snd‖ ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal)
variable {p α β}
@[simp]
theorem prod_norm_eq_card (f : WithLp 0 (α × β)) :
‖f‖ = (if ‖f.fst‖ = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if ‖f.snd‖ = 0 then 0 else 1) := by
convert if_pos rfl
theorem prod_norm_eq_sup (f : WithLp ∞ (α × β)) : ‖f‖ = ‖f.fst‖ ⊔ ‖f.snd‖ := by
dsimp [Norm.norm]
exact if_neg ENNReal.top_ne_zero
theorem prod_norm_eq_add (hp : 0 < p.toReal) (f : WithLp p (α × β)) :
‖f‖ = (‖f.fst‖ ^ p.toReal + ‖f.snd‖ ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
let hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff.mp hp
(if_neg hp'.1.ne').trans (if_neg hp'.2.ne)
end Norm
end DistNorm
section Aux
/-!
### The uniformity on finite `L^p` products is the product uniformity
In this section, we put the `L^p` edistance on `WithLp p (α × β)`, and we check that the uniformity
coming from this edistance coincides with the product uniformity, by showing that the canonical
map to the Prod type (with the `L^∞` distance) is a uniform embedding, as it is both Lipschitz and
antiLipschitz.
We only register this emetric space structure as a temporary instance, as the true instance (to be
registered later) will have as uniformity exactly the product uniformity, instead of the one coming
from the edistance (which is equal to it, but not defeq). See Note [forgetful inheritance]
explaining why having definitionally the right uniformity is often important.
-/
variable [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)]
/-- Endowing the space `WithLp p (α × β)` with the `L^p` pseudoemetric structure. This definition is
not satisfactory, as it does not register the fact that the topology and the uniform structure
coincide with the product one. Therefore, we do not register it as an instance. Using this as a
temporary pseudoemetric space instance, we will show that the uniform structure is equal (but not
defeq) to the product one, and then register an instance in which we replace the uniform structure
by the product one using this pseudoemetric space and `PseudoEMetricSpace.replaceUniformity`. -/
def prodPseudoEMetricAux [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
PseudoEMetricSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) where
edist_self := prod_edist_self p
edist_comm := prod_edist_comm p
edist_triangle f g h := by
rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | hp)
· simp only [prod_edist_eq_sup]
exact sup_le ((edist_triangle _ g.fst _).trans <| add_le_add le_sup_left le_sup_left)
((edist_triangle _ g.snd _).trans <| add_le_add le_sup_right le_sup_right)
· simp only [prod_edist_eq_add (zero_lt_one.trans_le hp)]
calc
(edist f.fst h.fst ^ p.toReal + edist f.snd h.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤
((edist f.fst g.fst + edist g.fst h.fst) ^ p.toReal +
(edist f.snd g.snd + edist g.snd h.snd) ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
gcongr <;> apply edist_triangle
_ ≤
(edist f.fst g.fst ^ p.toReal + edist f.snd g.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) +
(edist g.fst h.fst ^ p.toReal + edist g.snd h.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
have := ENNReal.Lp_add_le {0, 1}
(if · = 0 then edist f.fst g.fst else edist f.snd g.snd)
(if · = 0 then edist g.fst h.fst else edist g.snd h.snd) hp
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, not_false_eq_true, Finset.sum_insert,
Finset.sum_singleton] at this
exact this
attribute [local instance] WithLp.prodPseudoEMetricAux
variable {α β}
/-- An auxiliary lemma used twice in the proof of `WithLp.prodPseudoMetricAux` below. Not intended
for use outside this file. -/
theorem prod_sup_edist_ne_top_aux [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
(f g : WithLp ∞ (α × β)) :
edist f.fst g.fst ⊔ edist f.snd g.snd ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| by simp [edist, PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist]
variable (α β)
/-- Endowing the space `WithLp p (α × β)` with the `L^p` pseudometric structure. This definition is
not satisfactory, as it does not register the fact that the topology, the uniform structure, and the
bornology coincide with the product ones. Therefore, we do not register it as an instance. Using
this as a temporary pseudoemetric space instance, we will show that the uniform structure is equal
(but not defeq) to the product one, and then register an instance in which we replace the uniform
structure and the bornology by the product ones using this pseudometric space,
`PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity`, and `PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology`.
See note [reducible non-instances] -/
abbrev prodPseudoMetricAux [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] :
PseudoMetricSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist dist
(fun f g => by
rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h)
· exact prod_sup_edist_ne_top_aux f g
· rw [prod_edist_eq_add (zero_lt_one.trans_le h)]
refine ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by positivity) (ne_of_lt ?_)
simp [ENNReal.add_lt_top, ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg, edist_ne_top] )
fun f g => by
rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h)
· rw [prod_edist_eq_sup, prod_dist_eq_sup]
refine le_antisymm (sup_le ?_ ?_) ?_
· rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal (prod_sup_edist_ne_top_aux f g),
← PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist]
exact le_sup_left
· rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal (prod_sup_edist_ne_top_aux f g),
← PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist]
exact le_sup_right
· refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal ?_ ?_
· simp only [ge_iff_le, le_sup_iff, dist_nonneg, or_self]
· simp [edist, PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal]
· have h1 : edist f.fst g.fst ^ p.toReal ≠ ⊤ :=
ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans h) (edist_ne_top _ _)
have h2 : edist f.snd g.snd ^ p.toReal ≠ ⊤ :=
ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans h) (edist_ne_top _ _)
simp only [prod_edist_eq_add (zero_lt_one.trans_le h), dist_edist, ENNReal.toReal_rpow,
prod_dist_eq_add (zero_lt_one.trans_le h), ← ENNReal.toReal_add h1 h2]
attribute [local instance] WithLp.prodPseudoMetricAux
theorem prod_lipschitzWith_equiv_aux [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
LipschitzWith 1 (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) := by
intro x y
rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h)
· simp [edist]
· have cancel : p.toReal * (1 / p.toReal) = 1 := mul_div_cancel₀ 1 (zero_lt_one.trans_le h).ne'
rw [prod_edist_eq_add (zero_lt_one.trans_le h)]
simp only [edist, forall_prop_of_true, one_mul, ENNReal.coe_one, ge_iff_le, sup_le_iff]
constructor
· calc
edist x.fst y.fst ≤ (edist x.fst y.fst ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
simp only [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one, le_refl]
_ ≤ (edist x.fst y.fst ^ p.toReal + edist x.snd y.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
gcongr
simp only [self_le_add_right]
· calc
edist x.snd y.snd ≤ (edist x.snd y.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
simp only [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one, le_refl]
_ ≤ (edist x.fst y.fst ^ p.toReal + edist x.snd y.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
gcongr
simp only [self_le_add_left]
theorem prod_antilipschitzWith_equiv_aux [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
AntilipschitzWith ((2 : ℝ≥0) ^ (1 / p).toReal) (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) := by
intro x y
rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h)
· simp [edist]
· have pos : 0 < p.toReal := by positivity
have nonneg : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := by positivity
have cancel : p.toReal * (1 / p.toReal) = 1 := mul_div_cancel₀ 1 (ne_of_gt pos)
rw [prod_edist_eq_add pos, ENNReal.toReal_div 1 p]
simp only [edist, ← one_div, ENNReal.one_toReal]
calc
(edist x.fst y.fst ^ p.toReal + edist x.snd y.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤
(edist (WithLp.equiv p _ x) (WithLp.equiv p _ y) ^ p.toReal +
edist (WithLp.equiv p _ x) (WithLp.equiv p _ y) ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
gcongr <;> simp [edist]
_ = (2 ^ (1 / p.toReal) : ℝ≥0) * edist (WithLp.equiv p _ x) (WithLp.equiv p _ y) := by
simp only [← two_mul, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ nonneg, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, cancel,
ENNReal.rpow_one, ← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ nonneg, coe_ofNat]
theorem prod_aux_uniformity_eq [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
𝓤 (WithLp p (α × β)) = 𝓤[instUniformSpaceProd] := by
have A : UniformInducing (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) :=
(prod_antilipschitzWith_equiv_aux p α β).uniformInducing
(prod_lipschitzWith_equiv_aux p α β).uniformContinuous
have : (fun x : WithLp p (α × β) × WithLp p (α × β) =>
((WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) x.fst, (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) x.snd)) = id := by
ext i <;> rfl
rw [← A.comap_uniformity, this, comap_id]
theorem prod_aux_cobounded_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] :
cobounded (WithLp p (α × β)) = @cobounded _ Prod.instBornology :=
calc
cobounded (WithLp p (α × β)) = comap (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) (cobounded _) :=
le_antisymm (prod_antilipschitzWith_equiv_aux p α β).tendsto_cobounded.le_comap
(prod_lipschitzWith_equiv_aux p α β).comap_cobounded_le
_ = _ := comap_id
end Aux
/-! ### Instances on `L^p` products -/
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
instance instProdTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
instTopologicalSpaceProd
@[continuity]
theorem prod_continuous_equiv : Continuous (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) :=
continuous_id
@[continuity]
theorem prod_continuous_equiv_symm : Continuous (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)).symm :=
continuous_id
variable [T0Space α] [T0Space β]
instance instProdT0Space : T0Space (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
Prod.instT0Space
end TopologicalSpace
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
instance instProdUniformSpace : UniformSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
instUniformSpaceProd
theorem prod_uniformContinuous_equiv : UniformContinuous (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem prod_uniformContinuous_equiv_symm : UniformContinuous (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)).symm :=
uniformContinuous_id
variable [CompleteSpace α] [CompleteSpace β]
instance instProdCompleteSpace : CompleteSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
CompleteSpace.prod
end UniformSpace
instance instProdBornology [Bornology α] [Bornology β] : Bornology (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
Prod.instBornology
section ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommGroup α] [AddCommGroup β]
variable [Module 𝕜 α] [Module 𝕜 β]
/-- `WithLp.equiv` as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[simps! (config := .asFn) apply symm_apply]
protected def prodContinuousLinearEquiv : WithLp p (α × β) ≃L[𝕜] α × β where
toLinearEquiv := WithLp.linearEquiv _ _ _
continuous_toFun := prod_continuous_equiv _ _ _
continuous_invFun := prod_continuous_equiv_symm _ _ _
end ContinuousLinearEquiv
/-! Throughout the rest of the file, we assume `1 ≤ p` -/
variable [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)]
/-- `PseudoEMetricSpace` instance on the product of two pseudoemetric spaces, using the
`L^p` pseudoedistance, and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance instProdPseudoEMetricSpace [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
PseudoEMetricSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
(prodPseudoEMetricAux p α β).replaceUniformity (prod_aux_uniformity_eq p α β).symm
/-- `EMetricSpace` instance on the product of two emetric spaces, using the `L^p`
edistance, and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance instProdEMetricSpace [EMetricSpace α] [EMetricSpace β] : EMetricSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (WithLp p (α × β))
/-- `PseudoMetricSpace` instance on the product of two pseudometric spaces, using the
`L^p` distance, and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance instProdPseudoMetricSpace [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] :
PseudoMetricSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
((prodPseudoMetricAux p α β).replaceUniformity
(prod_aux_uniformity_eq p α β).symm).replaceBornology
fun s => Filter.ext_iff.1 (prod_aux_cobounded_eq p α β).symm sᶜ
/-- `MetricSpace` instance on the product of two metric spaces, using the `L^p` distance,
and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance instProdMetricSpace [MetricSpace α] [MetricSpace β] : MetricSpace (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
MetricSpace.ofT0PseudoMetricSpace _
variable {p α β}
theorem prod_nndist_eq_add [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
(hp : p ≠ ∞) (x y : WithLp p (α × β)) :
nndist x y = (nndist x.fst y.fst ^ p.toReal + nndist x.snd y.snd ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
NNReal.eq <| by
push_cast
exact prod_dist_eq_add (p.toReal_pos_iff_ne_top.mpr hp) _ _
theorem prod_nndist_eq_sup [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (x y : WithLp ∞ (α × β)) :
nndist x y = nndist x.fst y.fst ⊔ nndist x.snd y.snd :=
NNReal.eq <| by
push_cast
exact prod_dist_eq_sup _ _
variable (p α β)
theorem prod_lipschitzWith_equiv [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
LipschitzWith 1 (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) :=
prod_lipschitzWith_equiv_aux p α β
theorem prod_antilipschitzWith_equiv [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
AntilipschitzWith ((2 : ℝ≥0) ^ (1 / p).toReal) (WithLp.equiv p (α × β)) :=
prod_antilipschitzWith_equiv_aux p α β
theorem prod_infty_equiv_isometry [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
Isometry (WithLp.equiv ∞ (α × β)) :=
fun x y =>
le_antisymm (by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using prod_lipschitzWith_equiv ∞ α β x y)
(by
simpa only [ENNReal.div_top, ENNReal.zero_toReal, NNReal.rpow_zero, ENNReal.coe_one,
one_mul] using prod_antilipschitzWith_equiv ∞ α β x y)
/-- Seminormed group instance on the product of two normed groups, using the `L^p`
norm. -/
instance instProdSeminormedAddCommGroup [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (WithLp p (α × β)) where
dist_eq x y := by
rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h)
· simp only [prod_dist_eq_sup, prod_norm_eq_sup, dist_eq_norm]
rfl
· simp only [prod_dist_eq_add (zero_lt_one.trans_le h),
prod_norm_eq_add (zero_lt_one.trans_le h), dist_eq_norm]
rfl
/-- normed group instance on the product of two normed groups, using the `L^p` norm. -/
instance instProdNormedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedAddCommGroup β] :
NormedAddCommGroup (WithLp p (α × β)) :=
{ instProdSeminormedAddCommGroup p α β with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
example [NormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedAddCommGroup β] :
(instProdNormedAddCommGroup p α β).toMetricSpace.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace =
instProdTopologicalSpace p α β :=
rfl
example [NormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedAddCommGroup β] :
(instProdNormedAddCommGroup p α β).toMetricSpace.toUniformSpace = instProdUniformSpace p α β :=
rfl
example [NormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedAddCommGroup β] :
(instProdNormedAddCommGroup p α β).toMetricSpace.toBornology = instProdBornology p α β :=
rfl
section norm_of
variable {p α β}
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/ProdLp.lean | 608 | 612 | theorem prod_norm_eq_of_nat [Norm α] [Norm β] (n : ℕ) (h : p = n) (f : WithLp p (α × β)) :
‖f‖ = (‖f.fst‖ ^ n + ‖f.snd‖ ^ n) ^ (1 / (n : ℝ)) := by |
have := p.toReal_pos_iff_ne_top.mpr (ne_of_eq_of_ne h <| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top n)
simp only [one_div, h, Real.rpow_natCast, ENNReal.toReal_nat, eq_self_iff_true, Finset.sum_congr,
prod_norm_eq_add this]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
import Mathlib.Analysis.MellinTransform
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gamma.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cca40788df1b8755d5baf17ab2f27dacc2e17acb"
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
* `Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma`: `Γ` is complex-differentiable at all `s : ℂ` with
`s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`,
`Real.differentiableAt_Gamma`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
#align real.Gamma_integrand_is_o Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
#align real.Gamma_integral_convergent Real.GammaIntegral_convergent
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply ContinuousAt.continuousOn
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
#align complex.Gamma_integral_convergent Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
#align complex.Gamma_integral Complex.GammaIntegral
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
#align complex.Gamma_integral_conj Complex.GammaIntegral_conj
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal' r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
#align complex.Gamma_integral_of_real Complex.GammaIntegral_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
#align complex.Gamma_integral_one Complex.GammaIntegral_one
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
#align complex.partial_Gamma Complex.partialGamma
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
#align complex.tendsto_partial_Gamma Complex.tendsto_partialGamma
private theorem Gamma_integrand_interval_integrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_interval_integrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply ContinuousAt.continuousOn
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
#align complex.partial_Gamma_add_one Complex.partialGamma_add_one
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
(fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs.map_neg, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
#align complex.Gamma_integral_add_one Complex.GammaIntegral_add_one
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
#align complex.Gamma_aux Complex.GammaAux
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]; rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1]
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀]; contrapose! h1; rw [h1]
simp
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [← hn (s + 1) hh1]
#align complex.Gamma_aux_recurrence1 Complex.GammaAux_recurrence1
theorem GammaAux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux (n + 1) s := by
cases' n with n n
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]
rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
rintro rfl
rw [zero_re] at h1
exact h1.false
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have : GammaAux n (s + 1 + 1) / (s + 1) = GammaAux n (s + 1) := by
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [GammaAux_recurrence1 (s + 1) n hh1]
rw [this]
#align complex.Gamma_aux_recurrence2 Complex.GammaAux_recurrence2
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
irreducible_def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
GammaAux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
#align complex.Gamma Complex.Gamma
theorem Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = GammaAux n s := by
have u : ∀ k : ℕ, GammaAux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s := by
intro k; induction' k with k hk
· simp [Gamma]
· rw [← hk, ← add_assoc]
refine (GammaAux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) ?_).symm
rw [Nat.cast_add]
have i0 := Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_le]; exact Nat.zero_le k
convert (u <| n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm; rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
by_cases h : 0 ≤ 1 - s.re
· apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
exact_mod_cast lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.floor_le h) (by linarith : 1 - s.re < n + 1)
· rw [Nat.floor_of_nonpos]
· omega
· linarith
#align complex.Gamma_eq_Gamma_aux Complex.Gamma_eq_GammaAux
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` function. -/
theorem Gamma_add_one (s : ℂ) (h2 : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊
have t1 : -s.re < n := by simpa only [sub_sub_cancel_left] using Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
have t2 : -(s + 1).re < n := by rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [Gamma_eq_GammaAux s n t1, Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s + 1) n t2, GammaAux_recurrence1 s n t1]
field_simp
#align complex.Gamma_add_one Complex.Gamma_add_one
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) : Gamma s = GammaIntegral s :=
Gamma_eq_GammaAux s 0 (by norm_cast; linarith)
#align complex.Gamma_eq_integral Complex.Gamma_eq_integral
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by rw [Gamma_eq_integral] <;> simp
#align complex.Gamma_one Complex.Gamma_one
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [Gamma_add_one n.succ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n]
simp only [Nat.cast_succ, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul]; congr
#align complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (no_index (OfNat.ofNat (n + 1) : ℂ)) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [Gamma, zero_re, sub_zero, Nat.floor_one, GammaAux, div_zero]
#align complex.Gamma_zero Complex.Gamma_zero
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value 0. -/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Gamma_zero]
· have A : -(n.succ : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [neg_ne_zero, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : -(n : ℂ) = -↑n.succ + 1 := by simp
rw [this, Gamma_add_one _ A] at IH
contrapose! IH
exact mul_ne_zero A IH
#align complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero
theorem Gamma_conj (s : ℂ) : Gamma (conj s) = conj (Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : ℂ), GammaAux n (conj s) = conj (GammaAux n s) by
simp [Gamma, this]
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· rw [GammaAux]; exact GammaIntegral_conj
· intro s
rw [GammaAux]
dsimp only
rw [div_eq_mul_inv _ s, RingHom.map_mul, conj_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
suffices conj s + 1 = conj (s + 1) by rw [this, IH]
rw [RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_one]
#align complex.Gamma_conj Complex.Gamma_conj
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))` in terms of the Gamma
function, for complex `a`. -/
lemma integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
have aux : (1 / r : ℂ) ^ a = 1 / r * (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← cpow_one (1 / r : ℂ)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (one_div_ne_zero <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hr.ne'), add_sub_cancel]
calc
_ = ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * (r * t) ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) := by
refine MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hr.le hx.le, ← mul_assoc, one_div, ← ofReal_inv,
← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg (inv_pos.mpr hr).le hr.le, ← ofReal_mul r⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel hr.ne',
ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_mul]
_ = 1 / r * ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t) := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_mul]
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x ↦ _ * x ^ (a - 1) * exp (-x)) _ hr, mul_zero,
real_smul, ← one_div, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
_ = 1 / r * (1 / r : ℂ) ^ (a - 1) * (∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t)) := by
simp_rw [← integral_mul_left, mul_assoc]
_ = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [aux, Gamma_eq_integral ha]
congr 2 with x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, mul_comm]
end GammaDef
/-! Now check that the `Γ` function is differentiable, wherever this makes sense. -/
section GammaHasDeriv
/-- Rewrite the Gamma integral as an example of a Mellin transform. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_eq_mellin : GammaIntegral = mellin fun x => ↑(Real.exp (-x)) :=
funext fun s => by simp only [mellin, GammaIntegral, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align complex.Gamma_integral_eq_mellin Complex.GammaIntegral_eq_mellin
/-- The derivative of the `Γ` integral, at any `s ∈ ℂ` with `1 < re s`, is given by the Mellin
transform of `log t * exp (-t)`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_GammaIntegral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
HasDerivAt GammaIntegral (∫ t : ℝ in Ioi 0, t ^ (s - 1) * (Real.log t * Real.exp (-t))) s := by
rw [GammaIntegral_eq_mellin]
convert (mellin_hasDerivAt_of_isBigO_rpow (E := ℂ) _ _ (lt_add_one _) _ hs).2
· refine (Continuous.continuousOn ?_).locallyIntegrableOn measurableSet_Ioi
exact continuous_ofReal.comp (Real.continuous_exp.comp continuous_neg)
· rw [← isBigO_norm_left]
simp_rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, abs_ofReal, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, isBigO_norm_left]
simpa only [neg_one_mul] using (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop zero_lt_one _).isBigO
· simp_rw [neg_zero, rpow_zero]
refine isBigO_const_of_tendsto (?_ : Tendsto _ _ (𝓝 (1 : ℂ))) one_ne_zero
rw [(by simp : (1 : ℂ) = Real.exp (-0))]
exact (continuous_ofReal.comp (Real.continuous_exp.comp continuous_neg)).continuousWithinAt
#align complex.has_deriv_at_Gamma_integral Complex.hasDerivAt_GammaIntegral
theorem differentiableAt_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : 1 - s.re < n) (h2 : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (GammaAux n) s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· refine (hasDerivAt_GammaIntegral ?_).differentiableAt
rw [Nat.cast_zero] at h1; linarith
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
specialize hn (s + 1)
have a : 1 - (s + 1).re < ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ] at h1; rw [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re]; linarith
have b : ∀ m : ℕ, s + 1 ≠ -m := by
intro m; have := h2 (1 + m)
contrapose! this
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at this
simpa using this
refine DifferentiableAt.div (DifferentiableAt.comp _ (hn a b) ?_) ?_ ?_
· rw [differentiableAt_add_const_iff (1 : ℂ)]; exact differentiableAt_id
· exact differentiableAt_id
· simpa using h2 0
#align complex.differentiable_at_Gamma_aux Complex.differentiableAt_GammaAux
theorem differentiableAt_Gamma (s : ℂ) (hs : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) : DifferentiableAt ℂ Gamma s := by
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + 1
have hn : 1 - s.re < n := mod_cast Nat.lt_floor_add_one (1 - s.re)
apply (differentiableAt_GammaAux s n hn hs).congr_of_eventuallyEq
let S := {t : ℂ | 1 - t.re < n}
have : S ∈ 𝓝 s := by
rw [mem_nhds_iff]; use S
refine ⟨Subset.rfl, ?_, hn⟩
have : S = re ⁻¹' Ioi (1 - n : ℝ) := by
ext; rw [preimage, Ioi, mem_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq]; exact sub_lt_comm
rw [this]
exact Continuous.isOpen_preimage continuous_re _ isOpen_Ioi
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem this
intro t ht; rw [mem_setOf_eq] at ht
apply Gamma_eq_GammaAux; linarith
#align complex.differentiable_at_Gamma Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma
end GammaHasDeriv
/-- At `s = 0`, the Gamma function has a simple pole with residue 1. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_Gamma_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun z : ℂ => z * Gamma z) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 1) := by
rw [show 𝓝 (1 : ℂ) = 𝓝 (Gamma (0 + 1)) by simp only [zero_add, Complex.Gamma_one]]
convert (Tendsto.mono_left _ nhdsWithin_le_nhds).congr'
(eventuallyEq_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin Complex.Gamma_add_one)
refine ContinuousAt.comp (g := Gamma) ?_ (continuous_id.add continuous_const).continuousAt
refine (Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma _ fun m => ?_).continuousAt
rw [zero_add, ← ofReal_natCast, ← ofReal_neg, ← ofReal_one, Ne, ofReal_inj]
refine (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ zero_lt_one).ne'
exact neg_nonpos.mpr (Nat.cast_nonneg _)
#align complex.tendsto_self_mul_Gamma_nhds_zero Complex.tendsto_self_mul_Gamma_nhds_zero
end Complex
namespace Real
/-- The `Γ` function (of a real variable `s`). -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
def Gamma (s : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Complex.Gamma s).re
#align real.Gamma Real.Gamma
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
Gamma s = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.Gamma_eq_integral (by rwa [Complex.ofReal_re] : 0 < Complex.re s)]
dsimp only [Complex.GammaIntegral]
simp_rw [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_sub]
suffices ∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ↑(exp (-x)) * (x : ℂ) ^ ((s - 1 : ℝ) : ℂ) =
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ((exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ) : ℂ) by
have cc : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal' r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
conv_lhs => rw [this]; enter [1, 2, x]; rw [cc]
rw [_root_.integral_ofReal, ← cc, Complex.ofReal_re]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow (le_of_lt hx)]
push_cast; rfl
#align real.Gamma_eq_integral Real.Gamma_eq_integral
theorem Gamma_add_one {s : ℝ} (hs : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
simp_rw [Gamma]
rw [Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_add_one, Complex.re_ofReal_mul]
rwa [Complex.ofReal_ne_zero]
#align real.Gamma_add_one Real.Gamma_add_one
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_one, Complex.one_re]
#align real.Gamma_one Real.Gamma_one
theorem _root_.Complex.Gamma_ofReal (s : ℝ) : Complex.Gamma (s : ℂ) = Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_re, ← Complex.Gamma_conj, Complex.conj_ofReal]
#align complex.Gamma_of_real Complex.Gamma_ofReal
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_one,
Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial, ← Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (no_index (OfNat.ofNat (n + 1) : ℝ)) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.Gamma_ofReal, Complex.ofReal_inj] using
Complex.Gamma_zero
#align real.Gamma_zero Real.Gamma_zero
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`.
-/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_natCast, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.Gamma_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] using Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero n
#align real.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero Real.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 563 | 575 | theorem Gamma_pos_of_pos {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) : 0 < Gamma s := by |
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs]
have : (Function.support fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) ∩ Ioi 0 = Ioi 0 := by
rw [inter_eq_right]
intro x hx
rw [Function.mem_support]
exact mul_ne_zero (exp_pos _).ne' (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _).ne'
rw [setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae]
· rw [this, volume_Ioi, ← ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
· refine eventually_of_mem (self_mem_ae_restrict measurableSet_Ioi) ?_
exact fun x hx => (mul_pos (exp_pos _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)).le
· exact GammaIntegral_convergent hs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpaceDef
#align_import measure_theory.function.ae_measurable_sequence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d003c55042c3cd08aefd1ae9a42ef89441cdaaf3"
/-!
# Sequence of measurable functions associated to a sequence of a.e.-measurable functions
We define here tools to prove statements about limits (infi, supr...) of sequences of
`AEMeasurable` functions.
Given a sequence of a.e.-measurable functions `f : ι → α → β` with hypothesis
`hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ`, and a pointwise property `p : α → (ι → β) → Prop` such that we
have `hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x (fun n ↦ f n x)`, we define a sequence of measurable functions `aeSeq hf p`
and a measurable set `aeSeqSet hf p`, such that
* `μ (aeSeqSet hf p)ᶜ = 0`
* `x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p → ∀ i : ι, aeSeq hf hp i x = f i x`
* `x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p → p x (fun n ↦ f n x)`
-/
open MeasureTheory
open scoped Classical
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β γ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {f : ι → α → β}
{μ : Measure α} {p : α → (ι → β) → Prop}
/-- If we have the additional hypothesis `∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x (fun n ↦ f n x)`, this is a measurable set
whose complement has measure 0 such that for all `x ∈ aeSeqSet`, `f i x` is equal to
`(hf i).mk (f i) x` for all `i` and we have the pointwise property `p x (fun n ↦ f n x)`. -/
def aeSeqSet (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) (p : α → (ι → β) → Prop) : Set α :=
(toMeasurable μ { x | (∀ i, f i x = (hf i).mk (f i) x) ∧ p x fun n => f n x }ᶜ)ᶜ
#align ae_seq_set aeSeqSet
/-- A sequence of measurable functions that are equal to `f` and verify property `p` on the
measurable set `aeSeqSet hf p`. -/
noncomputable def aeSeq (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) (p : α → (ι → β) → Prop) : ι → α → β :=
fun i x => ite (x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p) ((hf i).mk (f i) x) (⟨f i x⟩ : Nonempty β).some
#align ae_seq aeSeq
namespace aeSeq
section MemAESeqSet
theorem mk_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p)
(i : ι) : (hf i).mk (f i) x = f i x :=
haveI h_ss : aeSeqSet hf p ⊆ { x | ∀ i, f i x = (hf i).mk (f i) x } := by
rw [aeSeqSet, ← compl_compl { x | ∀ i, f i x = (hf i).mk (f i) x }, Set.compl_subset_compl]
refine Set.Subset.trans (Set.compl_subset_compl.mpr fun x h => ?_) (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
exact h.1
(h_ss hx i).symm
#align ae_seq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_ae_seq_set aeSeq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet
theorem aeSeq_eq_mk_of_mem_aeSeqSet (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p) (i : ι) : aeSeq hf p i x = (hf i).mk (f i) x := by
simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_true]
#align ae_seq.ae_seq_eq_mk_of_mem_ae_seq_set aeSeq.aeSeq_eq_mk_of_mem_aeSeqSet
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEMeasurableSequence.lean | 64 | 66 | theorem aeSeq_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p) (i : ι) : aeSeq hf p i x = f i x := by |
simp only [aeSeq_eq_mk_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx i, mk_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx i]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Set neighborhoods of intervals
In this file we prove basic theorems about `𝓝ˢ s`,
where `s` is one of the intervals
`Set.Ici`, `Set.Iic`, `Set.Ioi`, `Set.Iio`, `Set.Ico`, `Set.Ioc`, `Set.Ioo`, and `Set.Icc`.
First, we prove lemmas in terms of filter equalities.
Then we prove lemmas about `s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t`, where both `s` and `t` are intervals.
Finally, we prove a few lemmas about filter bases of `𝓝ˢ (Iic a)` and `𝓝ˢ (Ici a)`.
-/
open Set Filter OrderDual
open scoped Topology
section OrderClosedTopology
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b c d : α}
/-!
# Formulae for `𝓝ˢ` of intervals
-/
@[simp] theorem nhdsSet_Ioi : 𝓝ˢ (Ioi a) = 𝓟 (Ioi a) := isOpen_Ioi.nhdsSet_eq
@[simp] theorem nhdsSet_Iio : 𝓝ˢ (Iio a) = 𝓟 (Iio a) := isOpen_Iio.nhdsSet_eq
@[simp] theorem nhdsSet_Ioo : 𝓝ˢ (Ioo a b) = 𝓟 (Ioo a b) := isOpen_Ioo.nhdsSet_eq
theorem nhdsSet_Ici : 𝓝ˢ (Ici a) = 𝓝 a ⊔ 𝓟 (Ioi a) := by
rw [← Ioi_insert, nhdsSet_insert, nhdsSet_Ioi]
theorem nhdsSet_Iic : 𝓝ˢ (Iic a) = 𝓝 a ⊔ 𝓟 (Iio a) := nhdsSet_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem nhdsSet_Ico (h : a < b) : 𝓝ˢ (Ico a b) = 𝓝 a ⊔ 𝓟 (Ioo a b) := by
rw [← Ioo_insert_left h, nhdsSet_insert, nhdsSet_Ioo]
theorem nhdsSet_Ioc (h : a < b) : 𝓝ˢ (Ioc a b) = 𝓝 b ⊔ 𝓟 (Ioo a b) := by
rw [← Ioo_insert_right h, nhdsSet_insert, nhdsSet_Ioo]
theorem nhdsSet_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : 𝓝ˢ (Icc a b) = 𝓝 a ⊔ 𝓝 b ⊔ 𝓟 (Ioo a b) := by
rcases h.eq_or_lt with rfl | hlt
· simp
· rw [← Ioc_insert_left h, nhdsSet_insert, nhdsSet_Ioc hlt, sup_assoc]
/-!
### Lemmas about `Ixi _ ∈ 𝓝ˢ (Set.Ici _)`
-/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/NhdsSet.lean | 57 | 58 | theorem Ioi_mem_nhdsSet_Ici_iff : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝ˢ (Ici b) ↔ a < b := by |
rw [isOpen_Ioi.mem_nhdsSet, Ici_subset_Ioi]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Tree.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Core
import Mathlib.Util.SynthesizeUsing
import Mathlib.Util.Qq
/-!
# A tactic for canceling numeric denominators
This file defines tactics that cancel numeric denominators from field Expressions.
As an example, we want to transform a comparison `5*(a/3 + b/4) < c/3` into the equivalent
`5*(4*a + 3*b) < 4*c`.
## Implementation notes
The tooling here was originally written for `linarith`, not intended as an interactive tactic.
The interactive version has been split off because it is sometimes convenient to use on its own.
There are likely some rough edges to it.
Improving this tactic would be a good project for someone interested in learning tactic programming.
-/
open Lean Parser Tactic Mathlib Meta NormNum Qq
initialize registerTraceClass `CancelDenoms
namespace CancelDenoms
/-! ### Lemmas used in the procedure -/
theorem mul_subst {α} [CommRing α] {n1 n2 k e1 e2 t1 t2 : α}
(h1 : n1 * e1 = t1) (h2 : n2 * e2 = t2) (h3 : n1 * n2 = k) : k * (e1 * e2) = t1 * t2 := by
rw [← h3, mul_comm n1, mul_assoc n2, ← mul_assoc n1, h1,
← mul_assoc n2, mul_comm n2, mul_assoc, h2]
#align cancel_factors.mul_subst CancelDenoms.mul_subst
theorem div_subst {α} [Field α] {n1 n2 k e1 e2 t1 : α}
(h1 : n1 * e1 = t1) (h2 : n2 / e2 = 1) (h3 : n1 * n2 = k) : k * (e1 / e2) = t1 := by
rw [← h3, mul_assoc, mul_div_left_comm, h2, ← mul_assoc, h1, mul_comm, one_mul]
#align cancel_factors.div_subst CancelDenoms.div_subst
theorem cancel_factors_eq_div {α} [Field α] {n e e' : α}
(h : n * e = e') (h2 : n ≠ 0) : e = e' / n :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq h2 <| by rwa [mul_comm] at h
#align cancel_factors.cancel_factors_eq_div CancelDenoms.cancel_factors_eq_div
theorem add_subst {α} [Ring α] {n e1 e2 t1 t2 : α} (h1 : n * e1 = t1) (h2 : n * e2 = t2) :
n * (e1 + e2) = t1 + t2 := by simp [left_distrib, *]
#align cancel_factors.add_subst CancelDenoms.add_subst
theorem sub_subst {α} [Ring α] {n e1 e2 t1 t2 : α} (h1 : n * e1 = t1) (h2 : n * e2 = t2) :
n * (e1 - e2) = t1 - t2 := by simp [left_distrib, *, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align cancel_factors.sub_subst CancelDenoms.sub_subst
theorem neg_subst {α} [Ring α] {n e t : α} (h1 : n * e = t) : n * -e = -t := by simp [*]
#align cancel_factors.neg_subst CancelDenoms.neg_subst
| Mathlib/Tactic/CancelDenoms/Core.lean | 66 | 68 | theorem pow_subst {α} [CommRing α] {n e1 t1 k l : α} {e2 : ℕ}
(h1 : n * e1 = t1) (h2 : l * n ^ e2 = k) : k * (e1 ^ e2) = l * t1 ^ e2 := by |
rw [← h2, ← h1, mul_pow, mul_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Quasispectrum
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Spectrum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Liouville
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Polynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.RadiusLiminf
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.CharacterSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Exponential
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.UnitizationL1
#align_import analysis.normed_space.spectrum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d608fc5d4e69d4cc21885913fb573a88b0deb521"
/-!
# The spectrum of elements in a complete normed algebra
This file contains the basic theory for the resolvent and spectrum of a Banach algebra.
## Main definitions
* `spectralRadius : ℝ≥0∞`: supremum of `‖k‖₊` for all `k ∈ spectrum 𝕜 a`
* `NormedRing.algEquivComplexOfComplete`: **Gelfand-Mazur theorem** For a complex
Banach division algebra, the natural `algebraMap ℂ A` is an algebra isomorphism whose inverse
is given by selecting the (unique) element of `spectrum ℂ a`
## Main statements
* `spectrum.isOpen_resolventSet`: the resolvent set is open.
* `spectrum.isClosed`: the spectrum is closed.
* `spectrum.subset_closedBall_norm`: the spectrum is a subset of closed disk of radius
equal to the norm.
* `spectrum.isCompact`: the spectrum is compact.
* `spectrum.spectralRadius_le_nnnorm`: the spectral radius is bounded above by the norm.
* `spectrum.hasDerivAt_resolvent`: the resolvent function is differentiable on the resolvent set.
* `spectrum.pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div_tendsto_nhds_spectralRadius`: Gelfand's formula for the
spectral radius in Banach algebras over `ℂ`.
* `spectrum.nonempty`: the spectrum of any element in a complex Banach algebra is nonempty.
## TODO
* compute all derivatives of `resolvent a`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open NormedSpace -- For `NormedSpace.exp`.
/-- The *spectral radius* is the supremum of the `nnnorm` (`‖·‖₊`) of elements in the spectrum,
coerced into an element of `ℝ≥0∞`. Note that it is possible for `spectrum 𝕜 a = ∅`. In this
case, `spectralRadius a = 0`. It is also possible that `spectrum 𝕜 a` be unbounded (though
not for Banach algebras, see `spectrum.isBounded`, below). In this case,
`spectralRadius a = ∞`. -/
noncomputable def spectralRadius (𝕜 : Type*) {A : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [Ring A] [Algebra 𝕜 A]
(a : A) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ k ∈ spectrum 𝕜 a, ‖k‖₊
#align spectral_radius spectralRadius
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {A : Type*}
namespace spectrum
section SpectrumCompact
open Filter
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
local notation "σ" => spectrum 𝕜
local notation "ρ" => resolventSet 𝕜
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap 𝕜 A
@[simp]
theorem SpectralRadius.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton A] (a : A) : spectralRadius 𝕜 a = 0 := by
simp [spectralRadius]
#align spectrum.spectral_radius.of_subsingleton spectrum.SpectralRadius.of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem spectralRadius_zero : spectralRadius 𝕜 (0 : A) = 0 := by
nontriviality A
simp [spectralRadius]
#align spectrum.spectral_radius_zero spectrum.spectralRadius_zero
theorem mem_resolventSet_of_spectralRadius_lt {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (h : spectralRadius 𝕜 a < ‖k‖₊) :
k ∈ ρ a :=
Classical.not_not.mp fun hn => h.not_le <| le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) k hn
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_of_spectral_radius_lt spectrum.mem_resolventSet_of_spectralRadius_lt
variable [CompleteSpace A]
theorem isOpen_resolventSet (a : A) : IsOpen (ρ a) :=
Units.isOpen.preimage ((continuous_algebraMap 𝕜 A).sub continuous_const)
#align spectrum.is_open_resolvent_set spectrum.isOpen_resolventSet
protected theorem isClosed (a : A) : IsClosed (σ a) :=
(isOpen_resolventSet a).isClosed_compl
#align spectrum.is_closed spectrum.isClosed
theorem mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt_mul {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (h : ‖a‖ * ‖(1 : A)‖ < ‖k‖) : k ∈ ρ a := by
rw [resolventSet, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
nontriviality A
have hk : k ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ((mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)).trans_lt h).ne'
letI ku := Units.map ↑ₐ.toMonoidHom (Units.mk0 k hk)
rw [← inv_inv ‖(1 : A)‖,
mul_inv_lt_iff (inv_pos.2 <| norm_pos_iff.2 (one_ne_zero : (1 : A) ≠ 0))] at h
have hku : ‖-a‖ < ‖(↑ku⁻¹ : A)‖⁻¹ := by simpa [ku, norm_algebraMap] using h
simpa [ku, sub_eq_add_neg, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] using (ku.add (-a) hku).isUnit
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_of_norm_lt_mul spectrum.mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt_mul
theorem mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt [NormOneClass A] {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (h : ‖a‖ < ‖k‖) : k ∈ ρ a :=
mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt_mul (by rwa [norm_one, mul_one])
#align spectrum.mem_resolvent_set_of_norm_lt spectrum.mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt
theorem norm_le_norm_mul_of_mem {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (hk : k ∈ σ a) : ‖k‖ ≤ ‖a‖ * ‖(1 : A)‖ :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt_mul hk
#align spectrum.norm_le_norm_mul_of_mem spectrum.norm_le_norm_mul_of_mem
theorem norm_le_norm_of_mem [NormOneClass A] {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (hk : k ∈ σ a) : ‖k‖ ≤ ‖a‖ :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt hk
#align spectrum.norm_le_norm_of_mem spectrum.norm_le_norm_of_mem
theorem subset_closedBall_norm_mul (a : A) : σ a ⊆ Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) (‖a‖ * ‖(1 : A)‖) :=
fun k hk => by simp [norm_le_norm_mul_of_mem hk]
#align spectrum.subset_closed_ball_norm_mul spectrum.subset_closedBall_norm_mul
theorem subset_closedBall_norm [NormOneClass A] (a : A) : σ a ⊆ Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) ‖a‖ :=
fun k hk => by simp [norm_le_norm_of_mem hk]
#align spectrum.subset_closed_ball_norm spectrum.subset_closedBall_norm
theorem isBounded (a : A) : Bornology.IsBounded (σ a) :=
Metric.isBounded_closedBall.subset (subset_closedBall_norm_mul a)
#align spectrum.is_bounded spectrum.isBounded
protected theorem isCompact [ProperSpace 𝕜] (a : A) : IsCompact (σ a) :=
Metric.isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded (spectrum.isClosed a) (isBounded a)
#align spectrum.is_compact spectrum.isCompact
instance instCompactSpace [ProperSpace 𝕜] (a : A) : CompactSpace (spectrum 𝕜 a) :=
isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp <| spectrum.isCompact a
instance instCompactSpaceNNReal {A : Type*} [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra ℝ A]
(a : A) [CompactSpace (spectrum ℝ a)] : CompactSpace (spectrum ℝ≥0 a) := by
rw [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at *
rw [← preimage_algebraMap ℝ]
exact closedEmbedding_subtype_val isClosed_nonneg |>.isCompact_preimage <| by assumption
section QuasispectrumCompact
variable {B : Type*} [NonUnitalNormedRing B] [NormedSpace 𝕜 B] [CompleteSpace B]
variable [IsScalarTower 𝕜 B B] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 B B] [ProperSpace 𝕜]
theorem _root_.quasispectrum.isCompact (a : B) : IsCompact (quasispectrum 𝕜 a) := by
rw [Unitization.quasispectrum_eq_spectrum_inr' 𝕜 𝕜,
← AlgEquiv.spectrum_eq (WithLp.unitizationAlgEquiv 𝕜).symm (a : Unitization 𝕜 B)]
exact spectrum.isCompact _
instance _root_.quasispectrum.instCompactSpace (a : B) :
CompactSpace (quasispectrum 𝕜 a) :=
isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp <| quasispectrum.isCompact a
instance _root_.quasispectrum.instCompactSpaceNNReal [NormedSpace ℝ B] [IsScalarTower ℝ B B]
[SMulCommClass ℝ B B] (a : B) [CompactSpace (quasispectrum ℝ a)] :
CompactSpace (quasispectrum ℝ≥0 a) := by
rw [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at *
rw [← quasispectrum.preimage_algebraMap ℝ]
exact closedEmbedding_subtype_val isClosed_nonneg |>.isCompact_preimage <| by assumption
end QuasispectrumCompact
theorem spectralRadius_le_nnnorm [NormOneClass A] (a : A) : spectralRadius 𝕜 a ≤ ‖a‖₊ := by
refine iSup₂_le fun k hk => ?_
exact mod_cast norm_le_norm_of_mem hk
#align spectrum.spectral_radius_le_nnnorm spectrum.spectralRadius_le_nnnorm
theorem exists_nnnorm_eq_spectralRadius_of_nonempty [ProperSpace 𝕜] {a : A} (ha : (σ a).Nonempty) :
∃ k ∈ σ a, (‖k‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = spectralRadius 𝕜 a := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, h⟩ := (spectrum.isCompact a).exists_isMaxOn ha continuous_nnnorm.continuousOn
exact ⟨k, hk, le_antisymm (le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) k hk) (iSup₂_le <| mod_cast h)⟩
#align spectrum.exists_nnnorm_eq_spectral_radius_of_nonempty spectrum.exists_nnnorm_eq_spectralRadius_of_nonempty
theorem spectralRadius_lt_of_forall_lt_of_nonempty [ProperSpace 𝕜] {a : A} (ha : (σ a).Nonempty)
{r : ℝ≥0} (hr : ∀ k ∈ σ a, ‖k‖₊ < r) : spectralRadius 𝕜 a < r :=
sSup_image.symm.trans_lt <|
((spectrum.isCompact a).sSup_lt_iff_of_continuous ha
(ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp continuous_nnnorm).continuousOn (r : ℝ≥0∞)).mpr
(by dsimp only [(· ∘ ·)]; exact mod_cast hr)
#align spectrum.spectral_radius_lt_of_forall_lt_of_nonempty spectrum.spectralRadius_lt_of_forall_lt_of_nonempty
open ENNReal Polynomial
variable (𝕜)
theorem spectralRadius_le_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div (a : A) (n : ℕ) :
spectralRadius 𝕜 a ≤ (‖a ^ (n + 1)‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / (n + 1) : ℝ) *
(‖(1 : A)‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / (n + 1) : ℝ) := by
refine iSup₂_le fun k hk => ?_
-- apply easy direction of the spectral mapping theorem for polynomials
have pow_mem : k ^ (n + 1) ∈ σ (a ^ (n + 1)) := by
simpa only [one_mul, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, one_smul, aeval_monomial, one_mul,
eval_monomial] using subset_polynomial_aeval a (@monomial 𝕜 _ (n + 1) (1 : 𝕜)) ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
-- power of the norm is bounded by norm of the power
have nnnorm_pow_le : (↑(‖k‖₊ ^ (n + 1)) : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ‖a ^ (n + 1)‖₊ * ‖(1 : A)‖₊ := by
simpa only [Real.toNNReal_mul (norm_nonneg _), norm_toNNReal, nnnorm_pow k (n + 1),
ENNReal.coe_mul] using coe_mono (Real.toNNReal_mono (norm_le_norm_mul_of_mem pow_mem))
-- take (n + 1)ᵗʰ roots and clean up the left-hand side
have hn : 0 < ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.succ_pos'
convert monotone_rpow_of_nonneg (one_div_pos.mpr hn).le nnnorm_pow_le using 1
all_goals dsimp
· rw [one_div, pow_rpow_inv_natCast]
positivity
rw [Nat.cast_succ, ENNReal.coe_mul_rpow]
#align spectrum.spectral_radius_le_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div spectrum.spectralRadius_le_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div
theorem spectralRadius_le_liminf_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div (a : A) :
spectralRadius 𝕜 a ≤ atTop.liminf fun n : ℕ => (‖a ^ n‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / n : ℝ) := by
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun ε hε => ?_
by_cases h : ε = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, zero_le']
have hε' : ε⁻¹ ≠ ∞ := fun h' =>
h (by simpa only [inv_inv, inv_top] using congr_arg (fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x⁻¹) h')
simp only [ENNReal.mul_le_iff_le_inv h (hε.trans_le le_top).ne, mul_comm ε⁻¹,
liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat', ENNReal.iSup_mul]
conv_rhs => arg 1; intro i; rw [ENNReal.iInf_mul hε']
rw [← ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, inv_one] at hε
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.mp
(ENNReal.eventually_pow_one_div_le (ENNReal.coe_ne_top : ↑‖(1 : A)‖₊ ≠ ∞) hε)
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (N + 1))
refine le_iInf fun n => ?_
simp only [← add_assoc]
refine (spectralRadius_le_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div 𝕜 a (n + N)).trans ?_
norm_cast
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hN (n + N + 1) (by omega)) _
#align spectrum.spectral_radius_le_liminf_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div spectrum.spectralRadius_le_liminf_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div
end SpectrumCompact
section resolvent
open Filter Asymptotics Bornology Topology
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A] [CompleteSpace A]
local notation "ρ" => resolventSet 𝕜
local notation "↑ₐ" => algebraMap 𝕜 A
theorem hasDerivAt_resolvent {a : A} {k : 𝕜} (hk : k ∈ ρ a) :
HasDerivAt (resolvent a) (-resolvent a k ^ 2) k := by
have H₁ : HasFDerivAt Ring.inverse _ (↑ₐ k - a) := hasFDerivAt_ring_inverse (𝕜 := 𝕜) hk.unit
have H₂ : HasDerivAt (fun k => ↑ₐ k - a) 1 k := by
simpa using (Algebra.linearMap 𝕜 A).hasDerivAt.sub_const a
simpa [resolvent, sq, hk.unit_spec, ← Ring.inverse_unit hk.unit] using H₁.comp_hasDerivAt k H₂
#align spectrum.has_deriv_at_resolvent spectrum.hasDerivAt_resolvent
-- refactored so this result was no longer necessary or useful
#noalign spectrum.norm_resolvent_le_forall
theorem eventually_isUnit_resolvent (a : A) : ∀ᶠ z in cobounded 𝕜, IsUnit (resolvent a z) := by
rw [atTop_basis_Ioi.cobounded_of_norm.eventually_iff]
exact ⟨‖a‖ * ‖(1 : A)‖, trivial, fun _ ↦ isUnit_resolvent.mp ∘ mem_resolventSet_of_norm_lt_mul⟩
theorem resolvent_isBigO_inv (a : A) : resolvent a =O[cobounded 𝕜] Inv.inv :=
have h : (fun z ↦ resolvent (z⁻¹ • a) (1 : 𝕜)) =O[cobounded 𝕜] (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ)) := by
simpa [Function.comp_def, resolvent] using
(NormedRing.inverse_one_sub_norm (R := A)).comp_tendsto
(by simpa using (tendsto_inv₀_cobounded (α := 𝕜)).smul_const a)
calc
resolvent a =ᶠ[cobounded 𝕜] fun z ↦ z⁻¹ • resolvent (z⁻¹ • a) (1 : 𝕜) := by
filter_upwards [isBounded_singleton (x := 0)] with z hz
lift z to 𝕜ˣ using Ne.isUnit hz
simpa [Units.smul_def] using congr(z⁻¹ • $(units_smul_resolvent_self (r := z) (a := a)))
_ =O[cobounded 𝕜] (· ⁻¹) := .of_norm_right <| by
simpa using (isBigO_refl (· ⁻¹) (cobounded 𝕜)).norm_right.smul h
theorem resolvent_tendsto_cobounded (a : A) : Tendsto (resolvent a) (cobounded 𝕜) (𝓝 0) :=
resolvent_isBigO_inv a |>.trans_tendsto tendsto_inv₀_cobounded
end resolvent
section OneSubSMul
open ContinuousMultilinearMap ENNReal FormalMultilinearSeries
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
variable (𝕜)
/-- In a Banach algebra `A` over a nontrivially normed field `𝕜`, for any `a : A` the
power series with coefficients `a ^ n` represents the function `(1 - z • a)⁻¹` in a disk of
radius `‖a‖₊⁻¹`. -/
theorem hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_inverse_one_sub_smul [CompleteSpace A] (a : A) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun z : 𝕜 => Ring.inverse (1 - z • a))
(fun n => ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing 𝕜 (Fin n) (a ^ n)) 0 ‖a‖₊⁻¹ :=
{ r_le := by
refine le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr =>
le_radius_of_bound_nnreal _ (max 1 ‖(1 : A)‖₊) fun n => ?_
rw [← norm_toNNReal, norm_mkPiRing, norm_toNNReal]
cases' n with n
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, le_refl, mul_one, or_true_iff, le_max_iff, pow_zero]
· refine
le_trans (le_trans (mul_le_mul_right' (nnnorm_pow_le' a n.succ_pos) (r ^ n.succ)) ?_)
(le_max_left _ _)
by_cases h : ‖a‖₊ = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, zero_le', pow_succ']
· rw [← coe_inv h, coe_lt_coe, NNReal.lt_inv_iff_mul_lt h] at hr
simpa only [← mul_pow, mul_comm] using pow_le_one' hr.le n.succ
r_pos := ENNReal.inv_pos.mpr coe_ne_top
hasSum := fun {y} hy => by
have norm_lt : ‖y • a‖ < 1 := by
by_cases h : ‖a‖₊ = 0
· simp only [nnnorm_eq_zero.mp h, norm_zero, zero_lt_one, smul_zero]
· have nnnorm_lt : ‖y‖₊ < ‖a‖₊⁻¹ := by
simpa only [← coe_inv h, mem_ball_zero_iff, Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal] using hy
rwa [← coe_nnnorm, ← Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt, Real.toNNReal_one, nnnorm_smul,
← NNReal.lt_inv_iff_mul_lt h]
simpa [← smul_pow, (NormedRing.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one _ norm_lt).hasSum_iff] using
(NormedRing.inverse_one_sub _ norm_lt).symm }
#align spectrum.has_fpower_series_on_ball_inverse_one_sub_smul spectrum.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_inverse_one_sub_smul
variable {𝕜}
theorem isUnit_one_sub_smul_of_lt_inv_radius {a : A} {z : 𝕜} (h : ↑‖z‖₊ < (spectralRadius 𝕜 a)⁻¹) :
IsUnit (1 - z • a) := by
by_cases hz : z = 0
· simp only [hz, isUnit_one, sub_zero, zero_smul]
· let u := Units.mk0 z hz
suffices hu : IsUnit (u⁻¹ • (1 : A) - a) by
rwa [IsUnit.smul_sub_iff_sub_inv_smul, inv_inv u] at hu
rw [Units.smul_def, ← Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← mem_resolventSet_iff]
refine mem_resolventSet_of_spectralRadius_lt ?_
rwa [Units.val_inv_eq_inv_val, nnnorm_inv,
coe_inv (nnnorm_ne_zero_iff.mpr (Units.val_mk0 hz ▸ hz : (u : 𝕜) ≠ 0)), lt_inv_iff_lt_inv]
#align spectrum.is_unit_one_sub_smul_of_lt_inv_radius spectrum.isUnit_one_sub_smul_of_lt_inv_radius
/-- In a Banach algebra `A` over `𝕜`, for `a : A` the function `fun z ↦ (1 - z • a)⁻¹` is
differentiable on any closed ball centered at zero of radius `r < (spectralRadius 𝕜 a)⁻¹`. -/
theorem differentiableOn_inverse_one_sub_smul [CompleteSpace A] {a : A} {r : ℝ≥0}
(hr : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < (spectralRadius 𝕜 a)⁻¹) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun z : 𝕜 => Ring.inverse (1 - z • a)) (Metric.closedBall 0 r) := by
intro z z_mem
apply DifferentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
have hu : IsUnit (1 - z • a) := by
refine isUnit_one_sub_smul_of_lt_inv_radius (lt_of_le_of_lt (coe_mono ?_) hr)
simpa only [norm_toNNReal, Real.toNNReal_coe] using
Real.toNNReal_mono (mem_closedBall_zero_iff.mp z_mem)
have H₁ : Differentiable 𝕜 fun w : 𝕜 => 1 - w • a := (differentiable_id.smul_const a).const_sub 1
exact DifferentiableAt.comp z (differentiableAt_inverse hu) H₁.differentiableAt
#align spectrum.differentiable_on_inverse_one_sub_smul spectrum.differentiableOn_inverse_one_sub_smul
end OneSubSMul
section GelfandFormula
open Filter ENNReal ContinuousMultilinearMap
open scoped Topology
variable [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra ℂ A] [CompleteSpace A]
/-- The `limsup` relationship for the spectral radius used to prove `spectrum.gelfand_formula`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Spectrum.lean | 367 | 382 | theorem limsup_pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div_le_spectralRadius (a : A) :
limsup (fun n : ℕ => (‖a ^ n‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / n : ℝ)) atTop ≤ spectralRadius ℂ a := by |
refine ENNReal.inv_le_inv.mp (le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt fun r r_pos r_lt => ?_)
simp_rw [inv_limsup, ← one_div]
let p : FormalMultilinearSeries ℂ ℂ A := fun n =>
ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing ℂ (Fin n) (a ^ n)
suffices h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius by
convert h
simp only [p, p.radius_eq_liminf, ← norm_toNNReal, norm_mkPiRing]
congr
ext n
rw [norm_toNNReal, ENNReal.coe_rpow_def ‖a ^ n‖₊ (1 / n : ℝ), if_neg]
exact fun ha => (lt_self_iff_false _).mp
(ha.2.trans_le (one_div_nonneg.mpr n.cast_nonneg : 0 ≤ (1 / n : ℝ)))
have H₁ := (differentiableOn_inverse_one_sub_smul r_lt).hasFPowerSeriesOnBall r_pos
exact ((hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_inverse_one_sub_smul ℂ a).exchange_radius H₁).r_le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Module
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Exponential
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
#align_import analysis.complex.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
/-!
# Normed space structure on `ℂ`.
This file gathers basic facts on complex numbers of an analytic nature.
## Main results
This file registers `ℂ` as a normed field, expresses basic properties of the norm, and gives
tools on the real vector space structure of `ℂ`. Notably, in the namespace `Complex`,
it defines functions:
* `reCLM`
* `imCLM`
* `ofRealCLM`
* `conjCLE`
They are bundled versions of the real part, the imaginary part, the embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`, and
the complex conjugate as continuous `ℝ`-linear maps. The last two are also bundled as linear
isometries in `ofRealLI` and `conjLIE`.
We also register the fact that `ℂ` is an `RCLike` field.
-/
assert_not_exists Absorbs
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
variable {z : ℂ}
open ComplexConjugate Topology Filter
instance : Norm ℂ :=
⟨abs⟩
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_abs (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = abs z :=
rfl
#align complex.norm_eq_abs Complex.norm_eq_abs
lemma norm_I : ‖I‖ = 1 := abs_I
theorem norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I (t : ℝ) : ‖exp (t * I)‖ = 1 := by
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.norm_exp_of_real_mul_I Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I
instance instNormedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup ℂ :=
AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ abs with
map_zero' := map_zero abs
neg' := abs.map_neg
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun _ => abs.eq_zero.1 }
instance : NormedField ℂ where
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
norm_mul' := map_mul abs
instance : DenselyNormedField ℂ where
lt_norm_lt r₁ r₂ h₀ hr :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := exists_between hr
⟨x, by rwa [norm_eq_abs, abs_ofReal, abs_of_pos (h₀.trans_lt h.1)]⟩
instance {R : Type*} [NormedField R] [NormedAlgebra R ℝ] : NormedAlgebra R ℂ where
norm_smul_le r x := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul ℝ r x, real_smul, norm_mul, norm_eq_abs, abs_ofReal, ← Real.norm_eq_abs,
norm_algebraMap']
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The module structure from `Module.complexToReal` is a normed space. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedSpace.complexToReal : NormedSpace ℝ E :=
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ E
#align normed_space.complex_to_real NormedSpace.complexToReal
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The algebra structure from `Algebra.complexToReal` is a normed algebra. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedAlgebra.complexToReal {A : Type*} [SeminormedRing A]
[NormedAlgebra ℂ A] : NormedAlgebra ℝ A :=
NormedAlgebra.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ A
theorem dist_eq (z w : ℂ) : dist z w = abs (z - w) :=
rfl
#align complex.dist_eq Complex.dist_eq
theorem dist_eq_re_im (z w : ℂ) : dist z w = √((z.re - w.re) ^ 2 + (z.im - w.im) ^ 2) := by
rw [sq, sq]
rfl
#align complex.dist_eq_re_im Complex.dist_eq_re_im
@[simp]
theorem dist_mk (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : ℝ) :
dist (mk x₁ y₁) (mk x₂ y₂) = √((x₁ - x₂) ^ 2 + (y₁ - y₂) ^ 2) :=
dist_eq_re_im _ _
#align complex.dist_mk Complex.dist_mk
theorem dist_of_re_eq {z w : ℂ} (h : z.re = w.re) : dist z w = dist z.im w.im := by
rw [dist_eq_re_im, h, sub_self, zero_pow two_ne_zero, zero_add, Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs, Real.dist_eq]
#align complex.dist_of_re_eq Complex.dist_of_re_eq
theorem nndist_of_re_eq {z w : ℂ} (h : z.re = w.re) : nndist z w = nndist z.im w.im :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_of_re_eq h
#align complex.nndist_of_re_eq Complex.nndist_of_re_eq
theorem edist_of_re_eq {z w : ℂ} (h : z.re = w.re) : edist z w = edist z.im w.im := by
rw [edist_nndist, edist_nndist, nndist_of_re_eq h]
#align complex.edist_of_re_eq Complex.edist_of_re_eq
theorem dist_of_im_eq {z w : ℂ} (h : z.im = w.im) : dist z w = dist z.re w.re := by
rw [dist_eq_re_im, h, sub_self, zero_pow two_ne_zero, add_zero, Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs, Real.dist_eq]
#align complex.dist_of_im_eq Complex.dist_of_im_eq
theorem nndist_of_im_eq {z w : ℂ} (h : z.im = w.im) : nndist z w = nndist z.re w.re :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_of_im_eq h
#align complex.nndist_of_im_eq Complex.nndist_of_im_eq
theorem edist_of_im_eq {z w : ℂ} (h : z.im = w.im) : edist z w = edist z.re w.re := by
rw [edist_nndist, edist_nndist, nndist_of_im_eq h]
#align complex.edist_of_im_eq Complex.edist_of_im_eq
theorem dist_conj_self (z : ℂ) : dist (conj z) z = 2 * |z.im| := by
rw [dist_of_re_eq (conj_re z), conj_im, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, sub_neg_eq_add, ← two_mul,
_root_.abs_mul, abs_of_pos (zero_lt_two' ℝ)]
#align complex.dist_conj_self Complex.dist_conj_self
theorem nndist_conj_self (z : ℂ) : nndist (conj z) z = 2 * Real.nnabs z.im :=
NNReal.eq <| by rw [← dist_nndist, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_two, Real.coe_nnabs, dist_conj_self]
#align complex.nndist_conj_self Complex.nndist_conj_self
theorem dist_self_conj (z : ℂ) : dist z (conj z) = 2 * |z.im| := by rw [dist_comm, dist_conj_self]
#align complex.dist_self_conj Complex.dist_self_conj
theorem nndist_self_conj (z : ℂ) : nndist z (conj z) = 2 * Real.nnabs z.im := by
rw [nndist_comm, nndist_conj_self]
#align complex.nndist_self_conj Complex.nndist_self_conj
@[simp 1100]
theorem comap_abs_nhds_zero : comap abs (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 0 :=
comap_norm_nhds_zero
#align complex.comap_abs_nhds_zero Complex.comap_abs_nhds_zero
theorem norm_real (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : ℂ)‖ = ‖r‖ :=
abs_ofReal _
#align complex.norm_real Complex.norm_real
@[simp 1100]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean | 163 | 165 | theorem norm_rat (r : ℚ) : ‖(r : ℂ)‖ = |(r : ℝ)| := by |
rw [← ofReal_ratCast]
exact norm_real _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.AddChar
#align_import analysis.fourier.fourier_transform from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# The Fourier transform
We set up the Fourier transform for complex-valued functions on finite-dimensional spaces.
## Design choices
In namespace `VectorFourier`, we define the Fourier integral in the following context:
* `𝕜` is a commutative ring.
* `V` and `W` are `𝕜`-modules.
* `e` is a unitary additive character of `𝕜`, i.e. an `AddChar 𝕜 circle`.
* `μ` is a measure on `V`.
* `L` is a `𝕜`-bilinear form `V × W → 𝕜`.
* `E` is a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space.
With these definitions, we define `fourierIntegral` to be the map from functions `V → E` to
functions `W → E` that sends `f` to
`fun w ↦ ∫ v in V, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ`,
This includes the cases `W` is the dual of `V` and `L` is the canonical pairing, or `W = V` and `L`
is a bilinear form (e.g. an inner product).
In namespace `Fourier`, we consider the more familiar special case when `V = W = 𝕜` and `L` is the
multiplication map (but still allowing `𝕜` to be an arbitrary ring equipped with a measure).
The most familiar case of all is when `V = W = 𝕜 = ℝ`, `L` is multiplication, `μ` is volume, and
`e` is `Real.fourierChar`, i.e. the character `fun x ↦ exp ((2 * π * x) * I)` (for which we
introduce the notation `𝐞` in the locale `FourierTransform`).
Another familiar case (which generalizes the previous one) is when `V = W` is an inner product space
over `ℝ` and `L` is the scalar product. We introduce two notations `𝓕` for the Fourier transform in
this case and `𝓕⁻ f (v) = 𝓕 f (-v)` for the inverse Fourier transform. These notations make
in particular sense for `V = W = ℝ`.
## Main results
At present the only nontrivial lemma we prove is `fourierIntegral_continuous`, stating that the
Fourier transform of an integrable function is continuous (under mild assumptions).
-/
noncomputable section
local notation "𝕊" => circle
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped Topology
/-! ## Fourier theory for functions on general vector spaces -/
namespace VectorFourier
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [CommRing 𝕜] {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [MeasurableSpace V]
{W : Type*} [AddCommGroup W] [Module 𝕜 W]
{E F G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℂ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℂ G]
section Defs
/-- The Fourier transform integral for `f : V → E`, with respect to a bilinear form `L : V × W → 𝕜`
and an additive character `e`. -/
def fourierIntegral (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V) (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E)
(w : W) : E :=
∫ v, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ
#align vector_fourier.fourier_integral VectorFourier.fourierIntegral
theorem fourierIntegral_smul_const (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (r : ℂ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (r • f) = r • fourierIntegral e μ L f := by
ext1 w
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [Pi.smul_apply, fourierIntegral, smul_comm _ r, integral_smul]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, fourierIntegral, ← integral_smul]
congr 1 with v
rw [smul_comm]
#align vector_fourier.fourier_integral_smul_const VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_smul_const
/-- The uniform norm of the Fourier integral of `f` is bounded by the `L¹` norm of `f`. -/
theorem norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
‖fourierIntegral e μ L f w‖ ≤ ∫ v : V, ‖f v‖ ∂μ := by
refine (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
simp_rw [norm_circle_smul]
#align vector_fourier.norm_fourier_integral_le_integral_norm VectorFourier.norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm
/-- The Fourier integral converts right-translation into scalar multiplication by a phase factor. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_comp_add_right [MeasurableAdd V] (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
[μ.IsAddRightInvariant] (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (v₀ : V) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (f ∘ fun v ↦ v + v₀) =
fun w ↦ e (L v₀ w) • fourierIntegral e μ L f w := by
ext1 w
dsimp only [fourierIntegral, Function.comp_apply, Submonoid.smul_def]
conv in L _ => rw [← add_sub_cancel_right v v₀]
rw [integral_add_right_eq_self fun v : V ↦ (e (-L (v - v₀) w) : ℂ) • f v, ← integral_smul]
congr 1 with v
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← Submonoid.coe_mul, ← e.map_add_eq_mul, ← LinearMap.neg_apply,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.map_sub, neg_sub]
#align vector_fourier.fourier_integral_comp_add_right VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_comp_add_right
end Defs
section Continuous
/-! In this section we assume 𝕜, `V`, `W` have topologies,
and `L`, `e` are continuous (but `f` needn't be).
This is used to ensure that `e (-L v w)` is (a.e. strongly) measurable. We could get away with
imposing only a measurable-space structure on 𝕜 (it doesn't have to be the Borel sigma-algebra of
a topology); but it seems hard to imagine cases where this extra generality would be useful, and
allowing it would complicate matters in the most important use cases.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [TopologicalRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
[TopologicalSpace W] {e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊} {μ : Measure V} {L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜}
/-- For any `w`, the Fourier integral is convergent iff `f` is integrable. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransform.lean | 132 | 147 | theorem fourierIntegral_convergent_iff (he : Continuous e)
(hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2) {f : V → E} (w : W) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ e (-L v w) • f v) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by |
-- first prove one-way implication
have aux {g : V → E} (hg : Integrable g μ) (x : W) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ e (-L v x) • g v) μ := by
have c : Continuous fun v ↦ e (-L v x) :=
he.comp (hL.comp (continuous_prod_mk.mpr ⟨continuous_id, continuous_const⟩)).neg
simp_rw [← integrable_norm_iff (c.aestronglyMeasurable.smul hg.1), norm_circle_smul]
exact hg.norm
-- then use it for both directions
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ aux hf w⟩
have := aux hf (-w)
simp_rw [← mul_smul (e _) (e _) (f _), ← e.map_add_eq_mul, LinearMap.map_neg, neg_add_self,
e.map_zero_eq_one, one_smul] at this -- the `(e _)` speeds up elaboration considerably
exact this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
#align_import topology.metric_space.gluing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e1a7bdeb4fd826b7e71d130d34988f0a2d26a177"
/-!
# Metric space gluing
Gluing two metric spaces along a common subset. Formally, we are given
```
Φ
Z ---> X
|
|Ψ
v
Y
```
where `hΦ : Isometry Φ` and `hΨ : Isometry Ψ`.
We want to complete the square by a space `GlueSpacescan hΦ hΨ` and two isometries
`toGlueL hΦ hΨ` and `toGlueR hΦ hΨ` that make the square commute.
We start by defining a predistance on the disjoint union `X ⊕ Y`, for which
points `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance 0. The (quotient) metric space associated
to this predistance is the desired space.
This is an instance of a more general construction, where `Φ` and `Ψ` do not have to be isometries,
but the distances in the image almost coincide, up to `2ε` say. Then one can almost glue the two
spaces so that the images of a point under `Φ` and `Ψ` are `ε`-close. If `ε > 0`, this yields a
metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, without the need to take a quotient. In particular,
this gives a natural metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, where the basepoints
are at distance 1, say, and the distances between other points are obtained by going through the two
basepoints.
(We also register the same metric space structure on a general disjoint union `Σ i, E i`).
We also define the inductive limit of metric spaces. Given
```
f 0 f 1 f 2 f 3
X 0 -----> X 1 -----> X 2 -----> X 3 -----> ...
```
where the `X n` are metric spaces and `f n` isometric embeddings, we define the inductive
limit of the `X n`, also known as the increasing union of the `X n` in this context, if we
identify `X n` and `X (n+1)` through `f n`. This is a metric space in which all `X n` embed
isometrically and in a way compatible with `f n`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
open Function Set Uniformity Topology
namespace Metric
section ApproxGluing
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y] {Φ : Z → X} {Ψ : Z → Y} {ε : ℝ}
/-- Define a predistance on `X ⊕ Y`, for which `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance `ε` -/
def glueDist (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : Sum X Y → Sum X Y → ℝ
| .inl x, .inl y => dist x y
| .inr x, .inr y => dist x y
| .inl x, .inr y => (⨅ p, dist x (Φ p) + dist y (Ψ p)) + ε
| .inr x, .inl y => (⨅ p, dist y (Φ p) + dist x (Ψ p)) + ε
#align metric.glue_dist Metric.glueDist
private theorem glueDist_self (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : ∀ x, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x x = 0
| .inl _ => dist_self _
| .inr _ => dist_self _
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Gluing.lean | 76 | 85 | theorem glueDist_glued_points [Nonempty Z] (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (p : Z) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl (Φ p)) (.inr (Ψ p)) = ε := by |
have : ⨅ q, dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) = 0 := by
have A : ∀ q, 0 ≤ dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) := fun _ =>
add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf A)
have : 0 = dist (Φ p) (Φ p) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ p) := by simp
rw [this]
exact ciInf_le ⟨0, forall_mem_range.2 A⟩ p
simp only [glueDist, this, zero_add]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
/-!
# Exact sequences with free modules
This file proves results about linear independence and span in exact sequences of modules.
## Main theorems
* `linearIndependent_shortExact`: Given a short exact sequence `0 ⟶ X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0` of
`R`-modules and linearly independent families `v : ι → X₁` and `w : ι' → X₃`, we get a linearly
independent family `ι ⊕ ι' → X₂`
* `span_rightExact`: Given an exact sequence `X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0` of `R`-modules and spanning
families `v : ι → X₁` and `w : ι' → X₃`, we get a spanning family `ι ⊕ ι' → X₂`
* Using `linearIndependent_shortExact` and `span_rightExact`, we prove `free_shortExact`: In a
short exact sequence `0 ⟶ X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0` where `X₁` and `X₃` are free, `X₂` is free as well.
## Tags
linear algebra, module, free
-/
open CategoryTheory
namespace ModuleCat
variable {ι ι' R : Type*} [Ring R] {S : ShortComplex (ModuleCat R)}
(hS : S.Exact) (hS' : S.ShortExact) {v : ι → S.X₁}
open CategoryTheory Submodule Set
section LinearIndependent
variable (hv : LinearIndependent R v) {u : ι ⊕ ι' → S.X₂}
(hw : LinearIndependent R (S.g ∘ u ∘ Sum.inr))
(hm : Mono S.f) (huv : u ∘ Sum.inl = S.f ∘ v)
theorem disjoint_span_sum : Disjoint (span R (range (u ∘ Sum.inl)))
(span R (range (u ∘ Sum.inr))) := by
rw [huv, disjoint_comm]
refine Disjoint.mono_right (span_mono (range_comp_subset_range _ _)) ?_
rw [← LinearMap.range_coe, span_eq (LinearMap.range S.f), hS.moduleCat_range_eq_ker]
exact range_ker_disjoint hw
/-- In the commutative diagram
```
f g
0 --→ X₁ --→ X₂ --→ X₃
↑ ↑ ↑
v| u| w|
ι → ι ⊕ ι' ← ι'
```
where the top row is an exact sequence of modules and the maps on the bottom are `Sum.inl` and
`Sum.inr`. If `u` is injective and `v` and `w` are linearly independent, then `u` is linearly
independent. -/
theorem linearIndependent_leftExact : LinearIndependent R u := by
rw [linearIndependent_sum]
refine ⟨?_, LinearIndependent.of_comp S.g hw, disjoint_span_sum hS hw huv⟩
rw [huv, LinearMap.linearIndependent_iff S.f]; swap
· rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, ← mono_iff_injective]
infer_instance
exact hv
/-- Given a short exact sequence `0 ⟶ X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0` of `R`-modules and linearly independent
families `v : ι → N` and `w : ι' → P`, we get a linearly independent family `ι ⊕ ι' → M` -/
theorem linearIndependent_shortExact {w : ι' → S.X₃} (hw : LinearIndependent R w) :
LinearIndependent R (Sum.elim (S.f ∘ v) (S.g.toFun.invFun ∘ w)) := by
apply linearIndependent_leftExact hS'.exact hv _ hS'.mono_f rfl
dsimp
convert hw
ext
apply Function.rightInverse_invFun ((epi_iff_surjective _).mp hS'.epi_g)
end LinearIndependent
section Span
/-- In the commutative diagram
```
f g
X₁ --→ X₂ --→ X₃
↑ ↑ ↑
v| u| w|
ι → ι ⊕ ι' ← ι'
```
where the top row is an exact sequence of modules and the maps on the bottom are `Sum.inl` and
`Sum.inr`. If `v` spans `X₁` and `w` spans `X₃`, then `u` spans `X₂`. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/ModuleCat/Free.lean | 94 | 125 | theorem span_exact {β : Type*} {u : ι ⊕ β → S.X₂} (huv : u ∘ Sum.inl = S.f ∘ v)
(hv : ⊤ ≤ span R (range v))
(hw : ⊤ ≤ span R (range (S.g ∘ u ∘ Sum.inr))) :
⊤ ≤ span R (range u) := by |
intro m _
have hgm : S.g m ∈ span R (range (S.g ∘ u ∘ Sum.inr)) := hw mem_top
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp] at hgm
obtain ⟨cm, hm⟩ := hgm
let m' : S.X₂ := Finsupp.sum cm fun j a ↦ a • (u (Sum.inr j))
have hsub : m - m' ∈ LinearMap.range S.f := by
rw [hS.moduleCat_range_eq_ker]
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
rw [← hm, map_finsupp_sum]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_smul]
obtain ⟨n, hnm⟩ := hsub
have hn : n ∈ span R (range v) := hv mem_top
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp] at hn
obtain ⟨cn, hn⟩ := hn
rw [← hn, map_finsupp_sum] at hnm
rw [← sub_add_cancel m m', ← hnm,]
simp only [map_smul]
have hn' : (Finsupp.sum cn fun a b ↦ b • S.f (v a)) =
(Finsupp.sum cn fun a b ↦ b • u (Sum.inl a)) := by
congr; ext a b; rw [← Function.comp_apply (f := S.f), ← huv, Function.comp_apply]
rw [hn']
apply add_mem
· rw [Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp]
use cn.mapDomain (Sum.inl)
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index_inj Sum.inl_injective]
· rw [Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp]
use cm.mapDomain (Sum.inr)
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index_inj Sum.inr_injective]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.category from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g: X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:max => (MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit : C)
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Used to ensure that `𝟙_` notation is used, as the ascription makes this not automatic. -/
@[delab app.CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit]
def delabTensorUnit : Delab := whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 3 do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit 3
let C ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(𝟙_ $C)
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g: X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Composition of tensor products is tensor product of compositions:
`(f₁ ⊗ g₁) ∘ (f₂ ⊗ g₂) = (f₁ ∘ f₂) ⊗ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monoidal_category CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.left_unitor_conjugation CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerLeft
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.right_unitor_conjugation CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.whiskerRight_id
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
end MonoidalCategory
open scoped MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
namespace MonoidalCategory
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
end MonoidalCategory
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {C : Type u} {X Y X' Y' : C} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
#align category_theory.tensor_iso CategoryTheory.tensorIso
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
namespace MonoidalCategory
section
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C]
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.tensor_is_iso CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.tensor_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.inv_tensor CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.inv_tensor
variable {U V W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C):
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.tensor_dite CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.tensor_dite
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.dite_tensor CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.dite_tensor
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 452 | 455 | theorem eqToHom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X = Y) (Z : C) :
eqToHom f ▷ Z = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj f rfl) := by |
cases f
simp only [id_whiskerRight, eqToHom_refl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.Basic
/-!
# Totally disconnected and totally separated topological spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsTotallyDisconnected`: all of its connected components are singletons.
* `IsTotallySeparated`: any two points can be separated by two disjoint opens that cover the set.
For both of these definitions, we also have a class stating that the whole space
satisfies that property: `TotallyDisconnectedSpace`, `TotallySeparatedSpace`.
-/
open Set Function
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section TotallyDisconnected
/-- A set `s` is called totally disconnected if every subset `t ⊆ s` which is preconnected is
a subsingleton, ie either empty or a singleton. -/
def IsTotallyDisconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ t, t ⊆ s → IsPreconnected t → t.Subsingleton
#align is_totally_disconnected IsTotallyDisconnected
theorem isTotallyDisconnected_empty : IsTotallyDisconnected (∅ : Set α) := fun _ ht _ _ x_in _ _ =>
(ht x_in).elim
#align is_totally_disconnected_empty isTotallyDisconnected_empty
theorem isTotallyDisconnected_singleton {x} : IsTotallyDisconnected ({x} : Set α) := fun _ ht _ =>
subsingleton_singleton.anti ht
#align is_totally_disconnected_singleton isTotallyDisconnected_singleton
/-- A space is totally disconnected if all of its connected components are singletons. -/
@[mk_iff]
class TotallyDisconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The universal set `Set.univ` in a totally disconnected space is totally disconnected. -/
isTotallyDisconnected_univ : IsTotallyDisconnected (univ : Set α)
#align totally_disconnected_space TotallyDisconnectedSpace
theorem IsPreconnected.subsingleton [TotallyDisconnectedSpace α] {s : Set α}
(h : IsPreconnected s) : s.Subsingleton :=
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.isTotallyDisconnected_univ s (subset_univ s) h
#align is_preconnected.subsingleton IsPreconnected.subsingleton
instance Pi.totallyDisconnectedSpace {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[∀ a, TopologicalSpace (β a)] [∀ a, TotallyDisconnectedSpace (β a)] :
TotallyDisconnectedSpace (∀ a : α, β a) :=
⟨fun t _ h2 =>
have this : ∀ a, IsPreconnected ((fun x : ∀ a, β a => x a) '' t) := fun a =>
h2.image (fun x => x a) (continuous_apply a).continuousOn
fun x x_in y y_in => funext fun a => (this a).subsingleton ⟨x, x_in, rfl⟩ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩⟩
#align pi.totally_disconnected_space Pi.totallyDisconnectedSpace
instance Prod.totallyDisconnectedSpace [TopologicalSpace β] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace α]
[TotallyDisconnectedSpace β] : TotallyDisconnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨fun t _ h2 =>
have H1 : IsPreconnected (Prod.fst '' t) := h2.image Prod.fst continuous_fst.continuousOn
have H2 : IsPreconnected (Prod.snd '' t) := h2.image Prod.snd continuous_snd.continuousOn
fun x hx y hy =>
Prod.ext (H1.subsingleton ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)
(H2.subsingleton ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)⟩
#align prod.totally_disconnected_space Prod.totallyDisconnectedSpace
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace α] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace β] :
TotallyDisconnectedSpace (Sum α β) := by
refine ⟨fun s _ hs => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ | ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := Sum.isPreconnected_iff.1 hs
· exact ht.subsingleton.image _
· exact ht.subsingleton.image _
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, TotallyDisconnectedSpace (π i)] :
TotallyDisconnectedSpace (Σi, π i) := by
refine ⟨fun s _ hs => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact subsingleton_empty
· obtain ⟨a, t, ht, rfl⟩ := Sigma.isConnected_iff.1 ⟨h, hs⟩
exact ht.isPreconnected.subsingleton.image _
-- Porting note: reformulated using `Pairwise`
/-- Let `X` be a topological space, and suppose that for all distinct `x,y ∈ X`, there
is some clopen set `U` such that `x ∈ U` and `y ∉ U`. Then `X` is totally disconnected. -/
theorem isTotallyDisconnected_of_isClopen_set {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
(hX : Pairwise fun x y => ∃ (U : Set X), IsClopen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U) :
IsTotallyDisconnected (Set.univ : Set X) := by
rintro S - hS
unfold Set.Subsingleton
by_contra! h_contra
rcases h_contra with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
obtain ⟨U, hU, hxU, hyU⟩ := hX hxy
specialize
hS U Uᶜ hU.2 hU.compl.2 (fun a _ => em (a ∈ U)) ⟨x, hx, hxU⟩ ⟨y, hy, hyU⟩
rw [inter_compl_self, Set.inter_empty] at hS
exact Set.not_nonempty_empty hS
#align is_totally_disconnected_of_clopen_set isTotallyDisconnected_of_isClopen_set
/-- A space is totally disconnected iff its connected components are subsingletons. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/TotallyDisconnected.lean | 108 | 119 | theorem totallyDisconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent_subsingleton :
TotallyDisconnectedSpace α ↔ ∀ x : α, (connectedComponent x).Subsingleton := by |
constructor
· intro h x
apply h.1
· exact subset_univ _
exact isPreconnected_connectedComponent
intro h; constructor
intro s s_sub hs
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, x_in⟩)
· exact subsingleton_empty
· exact (h x).anti (hs.subset_connectedComponent x_in)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Group
#align_import dynamics.periodic_pts from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d07245fd37786daa997af4f1a73a49fa3b748408"
/-!
# Periodic points
A point `x : α` is a periodic point of `f : α → α` of period `n` if `f^[n] x = x`.
## Main definitions
* `IsPeriodicPt f n x` : `x` is a periodic point of `f` of period `n`, i.e. `f^[n] x = x`.
We do not require `n > 0` in the definition.
* `ptsOfPeriod f n` : the set `{x | IsPeriodicPt f n x}`. Note that `n` is not required to
be the minimal period of `x`.
* `periodicPts f` : the set of all periodic points of `f`.
* `minimalPeriod f x` : the minimal period of a point `x` under an endomorphism `f` or zero
if `x` is not a periodic point of `f`.
* `orbit f x`: the cycle `[x, f x, f (f x), ...]` for a periodic point.
* `MulAction.period g x` : the minimal period of a point `x` under the multiplicative action of `g`;
an equivalent `AddAction.period g x` is defined for additive actions.
## Main statements
We provide “dot syntax”-style operations on terms of the form `h : IsPeriodicPt f n x` including
arithmetic operations on `n` and `h.map (hg : SemiconjBy g f f')`. We also prove that `f`
is bijective on each set `ptsOfPeriod f n` and on `periodicPts f`. Finally, we prove that `x`
is a periodic point of `f` of period `n` if and only if `minimalPeriod f x | n`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_point
-/
open Set
namespace Function
open Function (Commute)
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f fa : α → α} {fb : β → β} {x y : α} {m n : ℕ}
/-- A point `x` is a periodic point of `f : α → α` of period `n` if `f^[n] x = x`.
Note that we do not require `0 < n` in this definition. Many theorems about periodic points
need this assumption. -/
def IsPeriodicPt (f : α → α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :=
IsFixedPt f^[n] x
#align function.is_periodic_pt Function.IsPeriodicPt
/-- A fixed point of `f` is a periodic point of `f` of any prescribed period. -/
theorem IsFixedPt.isPeriodicPt (hf : IsFixedPt f x) (n : ℕ) : IsPeriodicPt f n x :=
hf.iterate n
#align function.is_fixed_pt.is_periodic_pt Function.IsFixedPt.isPeriodicPt
/-- For the identity map, all points are periodic. -/
theorem is_periodic_id (n : ℕ) (x : α) : IsPeriodicPt id n x :=
(isFixedPt_id x).isPeriodicPt n
#align function.is_periodic_id Function.is_periodic_id
/-- Any point is a periodic point of period `0`. -/
theorem isPeriodicPt_zero (f : α → α) (x : α) : IsPeriodicPt f 0 x :=
isFixedPt_id x
#align function.is_periodic_pt_zero Function.isPeriodicPt_zero
namespace IsPeriodicPt
instance [DecidableEq α] {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : Decidable (IsPeriodicPt f n x) :=
IsFixedPt.decidable
protected theorem isFixedPt (hf : IsPeriodicPt f n x) : IsFixedPt f^[n] x :=
hf
#align function.is_periodic_pt.is_fixed_pt Function.IsPeriodicPt.isFixedPt
protected theorem map (hx : IsPeriodicPt fa n x) {g : α → β} (hg : Semiconj g fa fb) :
IsPeriodicPt fb n (g x) :=
IsFixedPt.map hx (hg.iterate_right n)
#align function.is_periodic_pt.map Function.IsPeriodicPt.map
theorem apply_iterate (hx : IsPeriodicPt f n x) (m : ℕ) : IsPeriodicPt f n (f^[m] x) :=
hx.map <| Commute.iterate_self f m
#align function.is_periodic_pt.apply_iterate Function.IsPeriodicPt.apply_iterate
protected theorem apply (hx : IsPeriodicPt f n x) : IsPeriodicPt f n (f x) :=
hx.apply_iterate 1
#align function.is_periodic_pt.apply Function.IsPeriodicPt.apply
protected theorem add (hn : IsPeriodicPt f n x) (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) :
IsPeriodicPt f (n + m) x := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, iterate_add]
exact hn.comp hm
#align function.is_periodic_pt.add Function.IsPeriodicPt.add
theorem left_of_add (hn : IsPeriodicPt f (n + m) x) (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) :
IsPeriodicPt f n x := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, iterate_add] at hn
exact hn.left_of_comp hm
#align function.is_periodic_pt.left_of_add Function.IsPeriodicPt.left_of_add
theorem right_of_add (hn : IsPeriodicPt f (n + m) x) (hm : IsPeriodicPt f n x) :
IsPeriodicPt f m x := by
rw [add_comm] at hn
exact hn.left_of_add hm
#align function.is_periodic_pt.right_of_add Function.IsPeriodicPt.right_of_add
protected theorem sub (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) (hn : IsPeriodicPt f n x) :
IsPeriodicPt f (m - n) x := by
rcases le_total n m with h | h
· refine left_of_add ?_ hn
rwa [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h]
apply isPeriodicPt_zero
#align function.is_periodic_pt.sub Function.IsPeriodicPt.sub
protected theorem mul_const (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) (n : ℕ) : IsPeriodicPt f (m * n) x := by
simp only [IsPeriodicPt, iterate_mul, hm.isFixedPt.iterate n]
#align function.is_periodic_pt.mul_const Function.IsPeriodicPt.mul_const
protected theorem const_mul (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) (n : ℕ) : IsPeriodicPt f (n * m) x := by
simp only [mul_comm n, hm.mul_const n]
#align function.is_periodic_pt.const_mul Function.IsPeriodicPt.const_mul
theorem trans_dvd (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) {n : ℕ} (hn : m ∣ n) : IsPeriodicPt f n x :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hn
hk.symm ▸ hm.mul_const k
#align function.is_periodic_pt.trans_dvd Function.IsPeriodicPt.trans_dvd
protected theorem iterate (hf : IsPeriodicPt f n x) (m : ℕ) : IsPeriodicPt f^[m] n x := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, ← iterate_mul, mul_comm, iterate_mul]
exact hf.isFixedPt.iterate m
#align function.is_periodic_pt.iterate Function.IsPeriodicPt.iterate
theorem comp {g : α → α} (hco : Commute f g) (hf : IsPeriodicPt f n x) (hg : IsPeriodicPt g n x) :
IsPeriodicPt (f ∘ g) n x := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, hco.comp_iterate]
exact IsFixedPt.comp hf hg
#align function.is_periodic_pt.comp Function.IsPeriodicPt.comp
theorem comp_lcm {g : α → α} (hco : Commute f g) (hf : IsPeriodicPt f m x)
(hg : IsPeriodicPt g n x) : IsPeriodicPt (f ∘ g) (Nat.lcm m n) x :=
(hf.trans_dvd <| Nat.dvd_lcm_left _ _).comp hco (hg.trans_dvd <| Nat.dvd_lcm_right _ _)
#align function.is_periodic_pt.comp_lcm Function.IsPeriodicPt.comp_lcm
theorem left_of_comp {g : α → α} (hco : Commute f g) (hfg : IsPeriodicPt (f ∘ g) n x)
(hg : IsPeriodicPt g n x) : IsPeriodicPt f n x := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, hco.comp_iterate] at hfg
exact hfg.left_of_comp hg
#align function.is_periodic_pt.left_of_comp Function.IsPeriodicPt.left_of_comp
theorem iterate_mod_apply (h : IsPeriodicPt f n x) (m : ℕ) : f^[m % n] x = f^[m] x := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.mod_add_div m n, iterate_add_apply, (h.mul_const _).eq]
#align function.is_periodic_pt.iterate_mod_apply Function.IsPeriodicPt.iterate_mod_apply
protected theorem mod (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) (hn : IsPeriodicPt f n x) :
IsPeriodicPt f (m % n) x :=
(hn.iterate_mod_apply m).trans hm
#align function.is_periodic_pt.mod Function.IsPeriodicPt.mod
protected theorem gcd (hm : IsPeriodicPt f m x) (hn : IsPeriodicPt f n x) :
IsPeriodicPt f (m.gcd n) x := by
revert hm hn
refine Nat.gcd.induction m n (fun n _ hn => ?_) fun m n _ ih hm hn => ?_
· rwa [Nat.gcd_zero_left]
· rw [Nat.gcd_rec]
exact ih (hn.mod hm) hm
#align function.is_periodic_pt.gcd Function.IsPeriodicPt.gcd
/-- If `f` sends two periodic points `x` and `y` of the same positive period to the same point,
then `x = y`. For a similar statement about points of different periods see `eq_of_apply_eq`. -/
theorem eq_of_apply_eq_same (hx : IsPeriodicPt f n x) (hy : IsPeriodicPt f n y) (hn : 0 < n)
(h : f x = f y) : x = y := by
rw [← hx.eq, ← hy.eq, ← iterate_pred_comp_of_pos f hn, comp_apply, comp_apply, h]
#align function.is_periodic_pt.eq_of_apply_eq_same Function.IsPeriodicPt.eq_of_apply_eq_same
/-- If `f` sends two periodic points `x` and `y` of positive periods to the same point,
then `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_apply_eq (hx : IsPeriodicPt f m x) (hy : IsPeriodicPt f n y) (hm : 0 < m) (hn : 0 < n)
(h : f x = f y) : x = y :=
(hx.mul_const n).eq_of_apply_eq_same (hy.const_mul m) (mul_pos hm hn) h
#align function.is_periodic_pt.eq_of_apply_eq Function.IsPeriodicPt.eq_of_apply_eq
end IsPeriodicPt
/-- The set of periodic points of a given (possibly non-minimal) period. -/
def ptsOfPeriod (f : α → α) (n : ℕ) : Set α :=
{ x : α | IsPeriodicPt f n x }
#align function.pts_of_period Function.ptsOfPeriod
@[simp]
theorem mem_ptsOfPeriod : x ∈ ptsOfPeriod f n ↔ IsPeriodicPt f n x :=
Iff.rfl
#align function.mem_pts_of_period Function.mem_ptsOfPeriod
theorem Semiconj.mapsTo_ptsOfPeriod {g : α → β} (h : Semiconj g fa fb) (n : ℕ) :
MapsTo g (ptsOfPeriod fa n) (ptsOfPeriod fb n) :=
(h.iterate_right n).mapsTo_fixedPoints
#align function.semiconj.maps_to_pts_of_period Function.Semiconj.mapsTo_ptsOfPeriod
theorem bijOn_ptsOfPeriod (f : α → α) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
BijOn f (ptsOfPeriod f n) (ptsOfPeriod f n) :=
⟨(Commute.refl f).mapsTo_ptsOfPeriod n, fun x hx y hy hxy => hx.eq_of_apply_eq_same hy hn hxy,
fun x hx =>
⟨f^[n.pred] x, hx.apply_iterate _, by
rw [← comp_apply (f := f), comp_iterate_pred_of_pos f hn, hx.eq]⟩⟩
#align function.bij_on_pts_of_period Function.bijOn_ptsOfPeriod
theorem directed_ptsOfPeriod_pNat (f : α → α) : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun n : ℕ+ => ptsOfPeriod f n :=
fun m n => ⟨m * n, fun _ hx => hx.mul_const n, fun _ hx => hx.const_mul m⟩
#align function.directed_pts_of_period_pnat Function.directed_ptsOfPeriod_pNat
/-- The set of periodic points of a map `f : α → α`. -/
def periodicPts (f : α → α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | ∃ n > 0, IsPeriodicPt f n x }
#align function.periodic_pts Function.periodicPts
theorem mk_mem_periodicPts (hn : 0 < n) (hx : IsPeriodicPt f n x) : x ∈ periodicPts f :=
⟨n, hn, hx⟩
#align function.mk_mem_periodic_pts Function.mk_mem_periodicPts
theorem mem_periodicPts : x ∈ periodicPts f ↔ ∃ n > 0, IsPeriodicPt f n x :=
Iff.rfl
#align function.mem_periodic_pts Function.mem_periodicPts
theorem isPeriodicPt_of_mem_periodicPts_of_isPeriodicPt_iterate (hx : x ∈ periodicPts f)
(hm : IsPeriodicPt f m (f^[n] x)) : IsPeriodicPt f m x := by
rcases hx with ⟨r, hr, hr'⟩
suffices n ≤ (n / r + 1) * r by
-- Porting note: convert used to unfold IsPeriodicPt
change _ = _
convert (hm.apply_iterate ((n / r + 1) * r - n)).eq <;>
rw [← iterate_add_apply, Nat.sub_add_cancel this, iterate_mul, (hr'.iterate _).eq]
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
exact (Nat.lt_div_mul_add hr).le
#align function.is_periodic_pt_of_mem_periodic_pts_of_is_periodic_pt_iterate Function.isPeriodicPt_of_mem_periodicPts_of_isPeriodicPt_iterate
variable (f)
theorem bUnion_ptsOfPeriod : ⋃ n > 0, ptsOfPeriod f n = periodicPts f :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp [mem_periodicPts]
#align function.bUnion_pts_of_period Function.bUnion_ptsOfPeriod
theorem iUnion_pNat_ptsOfPeriod : ⋃ n : ℕ+, ptsOfPeriod f n = periodicPts f :=
iSup_subtype.trans <| bUnion_ptsOfPeriod f
#align function.Union_pnat_pts_of_period Function.iUnion_pNat_ptsOfPeriod
theorem bijOn_periodicPts : BijOn f (periodicPts f) (periodicPts f) :=
iUnion_pNat_ptsOfPeriod f ▸
bijOn_iUnion_of_directed (directed_ptsOfPeriod_pNat f) fun i => bijOn_ptsOfPeriod f i.pos
#align function.bij_on_periodic_pts Function.bijOn_periodicPts
variable {f}
theorem Semiconj.mapsTo_periodicPts {g : α → β} (h : Semiconj g fa fb) :
MapsTo g (periodicPts fa) (periodicPts fb) := fun _ ⟨n, hn, hx⟩ => ⟨n, hn, hx.map h⟩
#align function.semiconj.maps_to_periodic_pts Function.Semiconj.mapsTo_periodicPts
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
/-- Minimal period of a point `x` under an endomorphism `f`. If `x` is not a periodic point of `f`,
then `minimalPeriod f x = 0`. -/
def minimalPeriod (f : α → α) (x : α) :=
if h : x ∈ periodicPts f then Nat.find h else 0
#align function.minimal_period Function.minimalPeriod
theorem isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (f : α → α) (x : α) : IsPeriodicPt f (minimalPeriod f x) x := by
delta minimalPeriod
split_ifs with hx
· exact (Nat.find_spec hx).2
· exact isPeriodicPt_zero f x
#align function.is_periodic_pt_minimal_period Function.isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod
@[simp]
theorem iterate_minimalPeriod : f^[minimalPeriod f x] x = x :=
isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod f x
#align function.iterate_minimal_period Function.iterate_minimalPeriod
@[simp]
theorem iterate_add_minimalPeriod_eq : f^[n + minimalPeriod f x] x = f^[n] x := by
rw [iterate_add_apply]
congr
exact isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod f x
#align function.iterate_add_minimal_period_eq Function.iterate_add_minimalPeriod_eq
@[simp]
theorem iterate_mod_minimalPeriod_eq : f^[n % minimalPeriod f x] x = f^[n] x :=
(isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod f x).iterate_mod_apply n
#align function.iterate_mod_minimal_period_eq Function.iterate_mod_minimalPeriod_eq
theorem minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts (hx : x ∈ periodicPts f) : 0 < minimalPeriod f x := by
simp only [minimalPeriod, dif_pos hx, (Nat.find_spec hx).1.lt]
#align function.minimal_period_pos_of_mem_periodic_pts Function.minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts
theorem minimalPeriod_eq_zero_of_nmem_periodicPts (hx : x ∉ periodicPts f) :
minimalPeriod f x = 0 := by simp only [minimalPeriod, dif_neg hx]
#align function.minimal_period_eq_zero_of_nmem_periodic_pts Function.minimalPeriod_eq_zero_of_nmem_periodicPts
theorem IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_pos (hn : 0 < n) (hx : IsPeriodicPt f n x) :
0 < minimalPeriod f x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts <| mk_mem_periodicPts hn hx
#align function.is_periodic_pt.minimal_period_pos Function.IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_pos
theorem minimalPeriod_pos_iff_mem_periodicPts : 0 < minimalPeriod f x ↔ x ∈ periodicPts f :=
⟨not_imp_not.1 fun h => by simp only [minimalPeriod, dif_neg h, lt_irrefl 0, not_false_iff],
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts⟩
#align function.minimal_period_pos_iff_mem_periodic_pts Function.minimalPeriod_pos_iff_mem_periodicPts
theorem minimalPeriod_eq_zero_iff_nmem_periodicPts : minimalPeriod f x = 0 ↔ x ∉ periodicPts f := by
rw [← minimalPeriod_pos_iff_mem_periodicPts, not_lt, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
#align function.minimal_period_eq_zero_iff_nmem_periodic_pts Function.minimalPeriod_eq_zero_iff_nmem_periodicPts
| Mathlib/Dynamics/PeriodicPts.lean | 325 | 328 | theorem IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le (hn : 0 < n) (hx : IsPeriodicPt f n x) :
minimalPeriod f x ≤ n := by |
rw [minimalPeriod, dif_pos (mk_mem_periodicPts hn hx)]
exact Nat.find_min' (mk_mem_periodicPts hn hx) ⟨hn, hx⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_sin Complex.continuous_sin
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
#align complex.continuous_on_sin Complex.continuousOn_sin
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_cos Complex.continuous_cos
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
#align complex.continuous_on_cos Complex.continuousOn_cos
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_sinh Complex.continuous_sinh
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
continuity
#align complex.continuous_cosh Complex.continuous_cosh
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_sin Real.continuous_sin
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
#align real.continuous_on_sin Real.continuousOn_sin
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_cos Real.continuous_cos
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
#align real.continuous_on_cos Real.continuousOn_cos
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_sinh Real.continuous_sinh
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
#align real.continuous_cosh Real.continuous_cosh
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
#align real.exists_cos_eq_zero Real.exists_cos_eq_zero
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
#align real.pi Real.pi
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
#align real.cos_pi_div_two Real.cos_pi_div_two
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
#align real.one_le_pi_div_two Real.one_le_pi_div_two
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
#align real.pi_div_two_le_two Real.pi_div_two_le_two
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
#align real.two_le_pi Real.two_le_pi
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
#align real.pi_le_four Real.pi_le_four
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
#align real.pi_pos Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
#align real.pi_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
#align real.pi_div_two_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.two_pi_pos Real.two_pi_pos
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
#align nnreal.pi NNReal.pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_real_pi NNReal.coe_real_pi
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
#align nnreal.pi_pos NNReal.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
#align nnreal.pi_ne_zero NNReal.pi_ne_zero
end NNReal
namespace Real
open Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
#align real.sin_pi Real.sin_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
#align real.cos_pi Real.cos_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
#align real.sin_two_pi Real.sin_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
#align real.cos_two_pi Real.cos_two_pi
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
#align real.sin_antiperiodic Real.sin_antiperiodic
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
#align real.sin_periodic Real.sin_periodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
#align real.sin_add_pi Real.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
#align real.sin_add_two_pi Real.sin_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
#align real.sin_sub_pi Real.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
#align real.sin_sub_two_pi Real.sin_sub_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
#align real.sin_pi_sub Real.sin_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
#align real.sin_two_pi_sub Real.sin_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align real.sin_nat_mul_pi Real.sin_nat_mul_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align real.sin_int_mul_pi Real.sin_int_mul_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align real.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi Real.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
#align real.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi Real.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align real.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi Real.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align real.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi Real.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub Real.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub Real.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.coe_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
#align real.cos_antiperiodic Real.cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
#align real.cos_periodic Real.cos_periodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
#align real.cos_add_pi Real.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
#align real.cos_add_two_pi Real.cos_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
#align real.cos_sub_pi Real.cos_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
#align real.cos_sub_two_pi Real.cos_sub_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
#align real.cos_pi_sub Real.cos_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
#align real.cos_two_pi_sub Real.cos_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align real.cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
#align real.cos_add_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_add_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align real.cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align real.cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
#align real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
#align real.sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo Real.sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
#align real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
#align real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
#align real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
#align real.sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le Real.sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
#align real.sin_pi_div_two Real.sin_pi_div_two
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
#align real.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
#align real.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
#align real.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
#align real.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
#align real.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
#align real.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
#align real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
#align real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
#align real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le Real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align real.cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le Real.cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
#align real.sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq Real.sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
#align real.cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq Real.cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt Real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.sin_ne_zero_iff
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq Real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel ((Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero _ _).2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
#align real.cos_eq_one_iff Real.cos_eq_one_iff
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align real.cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt Real.cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
#align real.sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two Real.sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
#align real.strict_mono_on_sin Real.strictMonoOn_sin
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
#align real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
#align real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two Real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
#align real.strict_anti_on_cos Real.strictAntiOn_cos
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
#align real.cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
#align real.sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two Real.sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
#align real.inj_on_sin Real.injOn_sin
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
#align real.inj_on_cos Real.injOn_cos
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
#align real.surj_on_sin Real.surjOn_sin
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
#align real.surj_on_cos Real.surjOn_cos
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
#align real.sin_mem_Icc Real.sin_mem_Icc
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
#align real.cos_mem_Icc Real.cos_mem_Icc
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
#align real.maps_to_sin Real.mapsTo_sin
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
#align real.maps_to_cos Real.mapsTo_cos
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
#align real.bij_on_sin Real.bijOn_sin
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
#align real.bij_on_cos Real.bijOn_cos
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
#align real.range_cos Real.range_cos
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
#align real.range_sin Real.range_sin
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
#align real.range_cos_infinite Real.range_cos_infinite
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
#align real.range_sin_infinite Real.range_sin_infinite
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_zero Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_one Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_one
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_two Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_two
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_nonneg Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_succ Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
#align real.sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left Real.sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
#align real.cos_pi_over_two_pow Real.cos_pi_over_two_pow
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 791 | 793 | theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by |
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.measure.vector_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70a4f2197832bceab57d7f41379b2592d1110570"
/-!
# Vector valued measures
This file defines vector valued measures, which are σ-additive functions from a set to an add monoid
`M` such that it maps the empty set and non-measurable sets to zero. In the case
that `M = ℝ`, we called the vector measure a signed measure and write `SignedMeasure α`.
Similarly, when `M = ℂ`, we call the measure a complex measure and write `ComplexMeasure α`.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure` is a vector valued, σ-additive function that maps the empty
and non-measurable set to zero.
* `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map` is the pushforward of a vector measure along a function.
* `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict` is the restriction of a vector measure on some set.
## Notation
* `v ≤[i] w` means that the vector measure `v` restricted on the set `i` is less than or equal
to the vector measure `w` restricted on `i`, i.e. `v.restrict i ≤ w.restrict i`.
## Implementation notes
We require all non-measurable sets to be mapped to zero in order for the extensionality lemma
to only compare the underlying functions for measurable sets.
We use `HasSum` instead of `tsum` in the definition of vector measures in comparison to `Measure`
since this provides summability.
## Tags
vector measure, signed measure, complex measure
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
/-- A vector measure on a measurable space `α` is a σ-additive `M`-valued function (for some `M`
an add monoid) such that the empty set and non-measurable sets are mapped to zero. -/
structure VectorMeasure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M]
[TopologicalSpace M] where
measureOf' : Set α → M
empty' : measureOf' ∅ = 0
not_measurable' ⦃i : Set α⦄ : ¬MeasurableSet i → measureOf' i = 0
m_iUnion' ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
HasSum (fun i => measureOf' (f i)) (measureOf' (⋃ i, f i))
#align measure_theory.vector_measure MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.measure_of' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.measureOf'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.empty' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.empty'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.not_measurable' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.not_measurable'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.m_Union' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.m_iUnion'
/-- A `SignedMeasure` is an `ℝ`-vector measure. -/
abbrev SignedMeasure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] :=
VectorMeasure α ℝ
#align measure_theory.signed_measure MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure
/-- A `ComplexMeasure` is a `ℂ`-vector measure. -/
abbrev ComplexMeasure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] :=
VectorMeasure α ℂ
#align measure_theory.complex_measure MeasureTheory.ComplexMeasure
open Set MeasureTheory
namespace VectorMeasure
section
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
attribute [coe] VectorMeasure.measureOf'
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (VectorMeasure α M) fun _ => Set α → M :=
⟨VectorMeasure.measureOf'⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instCoeFun
initialize_simps_projections VectorMeasure (measureOf' → apply)
#noalign measure_theory.vector_measure.measure_of_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem empty (v : VectorMeasure α M) : v ∅ = 0 :=
v.empty'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.empty MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.empty
theorem not_measurable (v : VectorMeasure α M) {i : Set α} (hi : ¬MeasurableSet i) : v i = 0 :=
v.not_measurable' hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.not_measurable
theorem m_iUnion (v : VectorMeasure α M) {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : HasSum (fun i => v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) :=
v.m_iUnion' hf₁ hf₂
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.m_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.m_iUnion
theorem of_disjoint_iUnion_nat [T2Space M] (v : VectorMeasure α M) {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_disjoint_Union_nat MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (VectorMeasure α M) (Set α → M) (⇑) := fun v w h => by
cases v
cases w
congr
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_injective MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_injective
theorem ext_iff' (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : v = w ↔ ∀ i : Set α, v i = w i := by
rw [← coe_injective.eq_iff, Function.funext_iff]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ext_iff' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext_iff'
theorem ext_iff (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : v = w ↔ ∀ i : Set α, MeasurableSet i → v i = w i := by
constructor
· rintro rfl _ _
rfl
· rw [ext_iff']
intro h i
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· exact h i hi
· simp_rw [not_measurable _ hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ext_iff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : VectorMeasure α M} (h : ∀ i : Set α, MeasurableSet i → s i = t i) : s = t :=
(ext_iff s t).2 h
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ext MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext
variable [T2Space M] {v : VectorMeasure α M} {f : ℕ → Set α}
theorem hasSum_of_disjoint_iUnion [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : HasSum (fun i => v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
set g := fun i : ℕ => ⋃ (b : β) (_ : b ∈ Encodable.decode₂ β i), f b with hg
have hg₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (g i) :=
fun _ => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => hf₁ b
have hg₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on g) := Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_disjoint_on hf₂
have := v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hg₁ hg₂
rw [hg, Encodable.iUnion_decode₂] at this
have hg₃ : (fun i : β => v (f i)) = fun i => v (g (Encodable.encode i)) := by
ext x
rw [hg]
simp only
congr
ext y
simp only [exists_prop, Set.mem_iUnion, Option.mem_def]
constructor
· intro hy
exact ⟨x, (Encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).2 rfl, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
rw [Encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _] at hb₁
rwa [← Encodable.encode_injective hb₁]
rw [Summable.hasSum_iff, this, ← tsum_iUnion_decode₂]
· exact v.empty
· rw [hg₃]
change Summable ((fun i => v (g i)) ∘ Encodable.encode)
rw [Function.Injective.summable_iff Encodable.encode_injective]
· exact (v.m_iUnion hg₁ hg₂).summable
· intro x hx
convert v.empty
simp only [g, Set.iUnion_eq_empty, Option.mem_def, not_exists, Set.mem_range] at hx ⊢
intro i hi
exact False.elim ((hx i) ((Encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).1 hi))
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_sum_of_disjoint_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.hasSum_of_disjoint_iUnion
theorem of_disjoint_iUnion [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(hasSum_of_disjoint_iUnion hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_disjoint_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_disjoint_iUnion
theorem of_union {A B : Set α} (h : Disjoint A B) (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B) :
v (A ∪ B) = v A + v B := by
rw [Set.union_eq_iUnion, of_disjoint_iUnion, tsum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond]
exacts [fun b => Bool.casesOn b hB hA, pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 h]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_union
theorem of_add_of_diff {A B : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B) (h : A ⊆ B) :
v A + v (B \ A) = v B := by
rw [← of_union (@Set.disjoint_sdiff_right _ A B) hA (hB.diff hA), Set.union_diff_cancel h]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_add_of_diff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_add_of_diff
theorem of_diff {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [TopologicalSpace M] [T2Space M]
{v : VectorMeasure α M} {A B : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B)
(h : A ⊆ B) : v (B \ A) = v B - v A := by
rw [← of_add_of_diff hA hB h, add_sub_cancel_left]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_diff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_diff
theorem of_diff_of_diff_eq_zero {A B : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B)
(h' : v (B \ A) = 0) : v (A \ B) + v B = v A := by
symm
calc
v A = v (A \ B ∪ A ∩ B) := by simp only [Set.diff_union_inter]
_ = v (A \ B) + v (A ∩ B) := by
rw [of_union]
· rw [disjoint_comm]
exact Set.disjoint_of_subset_left A.inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_self_right
· exact hA.diff hB
· exact hA.inter hB
_ = v (A \ B) + v (A ∩ B ∪ B \ A) := by
rw [of_union, h', add_zero]
· exact Set.disjoint_of_subset_left A.inter_subset_left disjoint_sdiff_self_right
· exact hA.inter hB
· exact hB.diff hA
_ = v (A \ B) + v B := by rw [Set.union_comm, Set.inter_comm, Set.diff_union_inter]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_diff_of_diff_eq_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_diff_of_diff_eq_zero
theorem of_iUnion_nonneg {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [OrderedAddCommMonoid M]
[OrderClosedTopology M] {v : VectorMeasure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ v (f i)) : 0 ≤ v (⋃ i, f i) :=
(v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonneg hf₃
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_Union_nonneg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_iUnion_nonneg
theorem of_iUnion_nonpos {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [OrderedAddCommMonoid M]
[OrderClosedTopology M] {v : VectorMeasure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, v (f i) ≤ 0) : v (⋃ i, f i) ≤ 0 :=
(v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonpos hf₃
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_Union_nonpos MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_iUnion_nonpos
theorem of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : SignedMeasure α} {A B : Set α} (h : Disjoint A B)
(hA₁ : MeasurableSet A) (hB₁ : MeasurableSet B) (hA₂ : 0 ≤ s A) (hB₂ : 0 ≤ s B)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 := by
rw [of_union h hA₁ hB₁] at hAB
linarith
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero
theorem of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : SignedMeasure α} {A B : Set α} (h : Disjoint A B)
(hA₁ : MeasurableSet A) (hB₁ : MeasurableSet B) (hA₂ : s A ≤ 0) (hB₂ : s B ≤ 0)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 := by
rw [of_union h hA₁ hB₁] at hAB
linarith
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero
end
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [DistribMulAction R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
/-- Given a real number `r` and a signed measure `s`, `smul r s` is the signed
measure corresponding to the function `r • s`. -/
def smul (r : R) (v : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := r • ⇑v
empty' := by rw [Pi.smul_apply, empty, smul_zero]
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.smul_apply, v.not_measurable hi, smul_zero]
m_iUnion' _ hf₁ hf₂ := by exact HasSum.const_smul _ (v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.smul
instance instSMul : SMul R (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨smul⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (r : R) (v : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(r • v) = r • ⇑v := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_smul
theorem smul_apply (r : R) (v : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (r • v) i = r • v i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.smul_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.smul_apply
end SMul
section AddCommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
instance instZero : Zero (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨⟨0, rfl, fun _ _ => rfl, fun _ _ _ => hasSum_zero⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instZero
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨0⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.inhabited MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instInhabited
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : VectorMeasure α M) = 0 := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply (i : Set α) : (0 : VectorMeasure α M) i = 0 := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.zero_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.zero_apply
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
/-- The sum of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := v + w
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.add_apply, v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi, add_zero]
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := HasSum.add (v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂) (w.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.add
instance instAdd : Add (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨add⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(v + w) = v + w := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_add
theorem add_apply (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (v + w) i = v i + w i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.add_apply
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.addCommMonoid _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instAddCommMonoid
/-- `(⇑)` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : VectorMeasure α M →+ Set α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_fn_add_monoid_hom MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coeFnAddMonoidHom
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalAddGroup M]
/-- The negative of a vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def neg (v : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := -v
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.neg_apply, neg_eq_zero, v.not_measurable hi]
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := HasSum.neg <| v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.neg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.neg
instance instNeg : Neg (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨neg⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_neg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instNeg
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (v : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(-v) = -v := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_neg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_neg
theorem neg_apply (v : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (-v) i = -v i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.neg_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.neg_apply
/-- The difference of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def sub (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := v - w
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.sub_apply, v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi, sub_zero]
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := HasSum.sub (v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂) (w.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.sub MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.sub
instance instSub : Sub (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨sub⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_sub MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instSub
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(v - w) = v - w := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_sub MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_sub
theorem sub_apply (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (v - w) i = v i - w i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.sub_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.sub_apply
instance instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.addCommGroup _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add_comm_group MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instAddCommGroup
end AddCommGroup
section DistribMulAction
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [DistribMulAction R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
instance instDistribMulAction [ContinuousAdd M] : DistribMulAction R (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.distribMulAction coeFnAddMonoidHom coe_injective coe_smul
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.distrib_mul_action MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instDistribMulAction
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
instance instModule [ContinuousAdd M] : Module R (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.module R coeFnAddMonoidHom coe_injective coe_smul
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.module MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instModule
end Module
end VectorMeasure
namespace Measure
/-- A finite measure coerced into a real function is a signed measure. -/
@[simps]
def toSignedMeasure (μ : Measure α) [hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ] : SignedMeasure α where
measureOf' := fun s : Set α => if MeasurableSet s then (μ s).toReal else 0
empty' := by simp [μ.empty]
not_measurable' _ hi := if_neg hi
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := by
simp only [*, MeasurableSet.iUnion hf₁, if_true, measure_iUnion hf₂ hf₁]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_toReal_eq]
exacts [(summable_measure_toReal hf₁ hf₂).hasSum, fun _ ↦ measure_ne_top _ _]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure
theorem toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {i : Set α}
(hi : MeasurableSet i) : μ.toSignedMeasure i = (μ i).toReal :=
if_pos hi
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable
-- Without this lemma, `singularPart_neg` in `MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue` is
-- extremely slow
theorem toSignedMeasure_congr {μ ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν]
(h : μ = ν) : μ.toSignedMeasure = ν.toSignedMeasure := by
congr
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_congr
theorem toSignedMeasure_eq_toSignedMeasure_iff {μ ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
[IsFiniteMeasure ν] : μ.toSignedMeasure = ν.toSignedMeasure ↔ μ = ν := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· ext1 i hi
have : μ.toSignedMeasure i = ν.toSignedMeasure i := by rw [h]
rwa [toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi,
ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal] at this
<;> exact measure_ne_top _ _
· congr
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_eq_to_signed_measure_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_eq_toSignedMeasure_iff
@[simp]
theorem toSignedMeasure_zero : (0 : Measure α).toSignedMeasure = 0 := by
ext i
simp
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_zero
@[simp]
theorem toSignedMeasure_add (μ ν : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] :
(μ + ν).toSignedMeasure = μ.toSignedMeasure + ν.toSignedMeasure := by
ext i hi
rw [toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply,
ENNReal.toReal_add (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)) (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)),
VectorMeasure.add_apply, toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi,
toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_add MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_add
@[simp]
theorem toSignedMeasure_smul (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • μ).toSignedMeasure = r • μ.toSignedMeasure := by
ext i hi
rw [toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, VectorMeasure.smul_apply,
toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, ENNReal.toReal_smul]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_smul
/-- A measure is a vector measure over `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
@[simps]
def toENNRealVectorMeasure (μ : Measure α) : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞ where
measureOf' := fun i : Set α => if MeasurableSet i then μ i else 0
empty' := by simp [μ.empty]
not_measurable' _ hi := if_neg hi
m_iUnion' _ hf₁ hf₂ := by
simp only
rw [Summable.hasSum_iff ENNReal.summable, if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hf₁),
MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion hf₂ hf₁]
exact tsum_congr fun n => if_pos (hf₁ n)
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure
theorem toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable {μ : Measure α} {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) :
μ.toENNRealVectorMeasure i = μ i :=
if_pos hi
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable
@[simp]
theorem toENNRealVectorMeasure_zero : (0 : Measure α).toENNRealVectorMeasure = 0 := by
ext i
simp
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_zero
@[simp]
theorem toENNRealVectorMeasure_add (μ ν : Measure α) :
(μ + ν).toENNRealVectorMeasure = μ.toENNRealVectorMeasure + ν.toENNRealVectorMeasure := by
refine MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext fun i hi => ?_
rw [toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply, VectorMeasure.add_apply,
toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hi, toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hi]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure_add MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_add
theorem toSignedMeasure_sub_apply {μ ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν]
{i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) :
(μ.toSignedMeasure - ν.toSignedMeasure) i = (μ i).toReal - (ν i).toReal := by
rw [VectorMeasure.sub_apply, toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi,
Measure.toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_sub_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_sub_apply
end Measure
namespace VectorMeasure
open Measure
section
/-- A vector measure over `ℝ≥0∞` is a measure. -/
def ennrealToMeasure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (v : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞) : Measure α :=
ofMeasurable (fun s _ => v s) v.empty fun _ hf₁ hf₂ => v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hf₁ hf₂
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ennreal_to_measure MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ennrealToMeasure
theorem ennrealToMeasure_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} {v : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ennrealToMeasure v s = v s := by
rw [ennrealToMeasure, ofMeasurable_apply _ hs]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ennreal_to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ennrealToMeasure_apply
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_ennrealToMeasure
(μ : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞) :
toENNRealVectorMeasure (ennrealToMeasure μ) = μ := ext fun s hs => by
rw [toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hs, ennrealToMeasure_apply hs]
@[simp]
theorem ennrealToMeasure_toENNRealVectorMeasure (μ : Measure α) :
ennrealToMeasure (toENNRealVectorMeasure μ) = μ := Measure.ext fun s hs => by
rw [ennrealToMeasure_apply hs, toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hs]
/-- The equiv between `VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞` and `Measure α` formed by
`MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ennrealToMeasure` and
`MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure`. -/
@[simps]
def equivMeasure [MeasurableSpace α] : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞ ≃ Measure α where
toFun := ennrealToMeasure
invFun := toENNRealVectorMeasure
left_inv := toENNRealVectorMeasure_ennrealToMeasure
right_inv := ennrealToMeasure_toENNRealVectorMeasure
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.equiv_measure MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.equivMeasure
end
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable (v : VectorMeasure α M)
/-- The pushforward of a vector measure along a function. -/
def map (v : VectorMeasure α M) (f : α → β) : VectorMeasure β M :=
if hf : Measurable f then
{ measureOf' := fun s => if MeasurableSet s then v (f ⁻¹' s) else 0
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' := fun i hi => if_neg hi
m_iUnion' := by
intro g hg₁ hg₂
simp only
convert v.m_iUnion (fun i => hf (hg₁ i)) fun i j hij => (hg₂ hij).preimage _
· rw [if_pos (hg₁ _)]
· rw [Set.preimage_iUnion, if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hg₁)] }
else 0
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map
theorem map_not_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : ¬Measurable f) : v.map f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_not_measurable
theorem map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
v.map f s = v (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map, dif_pos hf]
exact if_pos hs
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_apply
@[simp]
theorem map_id : v.map id = v :=
ext fun i hi => by rw [map_apply v measurable_id hi, Set.preimage_id]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_id MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : VectorMeasure α M).map f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Measurable f
· ext i hi
rw [map_apply _ hf hi, zero_apply, zero_apply]
· exact dif_neg hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_zero
section
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [TopologicalSpace N]
/-- Given a vector measure `v` on `M` and a continuous `AddMonoidHom` `f : M → N`, `f ∘ v` is a
vector measure on `N`. -/
def mapRange (v : VectorMeasure α M) (f : M →+ N) (hf : Continuous f) : VectorMeasure α N where
measureOf' s := f (v s)
empty' := by simp only; rw [empty, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
not_measurable' i hi := by simp only; rw [not_measurable v hi, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
m_iUnion' g hg₁ hg₂ := HasSum.map (v.m_iUnion hg₁ hg₂) f hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M →+ N} (hf : Continuous f) {s : Set α} : v.mapRange f hf s = f (v s) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id : v.mapRange (AddMonoidHom.id M) continuous_id = v := by
ext
rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_id MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_id
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M →+ N} (hf : Continuous f) :
mapRange (0 : VectorMeasure α M) f hf = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_zero
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousAdd N]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_add {v w : VectorMeasure α M} {f : M →+ N} (hf : Continuous f) :
(v + w).mapRange f hf = v.mapRange f hf + w.mapRange f hf := by
ext
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_add
/-- Given a continuous `AddMonoidHom` `f : M → N`, `mapRangeHom` is the `AddMonoidHom` mapping the
vector measure `v` on `M` to the vector measure `f ∘ v` on `N`. -/
def mapRangeHom (f : M →+ N) (hf : Continuous f) : VectorMeasure α M →+ VectorMeasure α N where
toFun v := v.mapRange f hf
map_zero' := mapRange_zero hf
map_add' _ _ := mapRange_add hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_hom MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRangeHom
end ContinuousAdd
section Module
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R M] [Module R N]
variable [ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousAdd N] [ContinuousConstSMul R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R N]
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f : M → N`, `mapRangeₗ` is the linear map mapping the
vector measure `v` on `M` to the vector measure `f ∘ v` on `N`. -/
def mapRangeₗ (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (hf : Continuous f) : VectorMeasure α M →ₗ[R] VectorMeasure α N where
toFun v := v.mapRange f.toAddMonoidHom hf
map_add' _ _ := mapRange_add hf
map_smul' := by
intros
ext
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_rangeₗ MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRangeₗ
end Module
end
/-- The restriction of a vector measure on some set. -/
def restrict (v : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : VectorMeasure α M :=
if hi : MeasurableSet i then
{ measureOf' := fun s => if MeasurableSet s then v (s ∩ i) else 0
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' := fun i hi => if_neg hi
m_iUnion' := by
intro f hf₁ hf₂
simp only
convert v.m_iUnion (fun n => (hf₁ n).inter hi)
(hf₂.mono fun i j => Disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left)
· rw [if_pos (hf₁ _)]
· rw [Set.iUnion_inter, if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hf₁)] }
else 0
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict
theorem restrict_not_measurable {i : Set α} (hi : ¬MeasurableSet i) : v.restrict i = 0 :=
dif_neg hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_not_measurable
theorem restrict_apply {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) {j : Set α} (hj : MeasurableSet j) :
v.restrict i j = v (j ∩ i) := by
rw [restrict, dif_pos hi]
exact if_pos hj
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_eq_self {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) {j : Set α} (hj : MeasurableSet j)
(hij : j ⊆ i) : v.restrict i j = v j := by
rw [restrict_apply v hi hj, Set.inter_eq_left.2 hij]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_eq_self MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : v.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
ext fun i hi => by
rw [restrict_apply v MeasurableSet.empty hi, Set.inter_empty, v.empty, zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_empty MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : v.restrict Set.univ = v :=
ext fun i hi => by rw [restrict_apply v MeasurableSet.univ hi, Set.inter_univ]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_univ MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_univ
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {i : Set α} : (0 : VectorMeasure α M).restrict i = 0 := by
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· ext j hj
rw [restrict_apply 0 hi hj, zero_apply, zero_apply]
· exact dif_neg hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_zero
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
theorem map_add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (f : α → β) : (v + w).map f = v.map f + w.map f := by
by_cases hf : Measurable f
· ext i hi
simp [map_apply _ hf hi]
· simp [map, dif_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_add
/-- `VectorMeasure.map` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapGm (f : α → β) : VectorMeasure α M →+ VectorMeasure β M where
toFun v := v.map f
map_zero' := map_zero f
map_add' _ _ := map_add _ _ f
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_gm MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapGm
theorem restrict_add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) :
(v + w).restrict i = v.restrict i + w.restrict i := by
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· ext j hj
simp [restrict_apply _ hi hj]
· simp [restrict_not_measurable _ hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_add
/-- `VectorMeasure.restrict` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def restrictGm (i : Set α) : VectorMeasure α M →+ VectorMeasure α M where
toFun v := v.restrict i
map_zero' := restrict_zero
map_add' _ _ := restrict_add _ _ i
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_gm MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrictGm
end ContinuousAdd
end
section
variable [MeasurableSpace β]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [DistribMulAction R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
@[simp]
theorem map_smul {v : VectorMeasure α M} {f : α → β} (c : R) : (c • v).map f = c • v.map f := by
by_cases hf : Measurable f
· ext i hi
simp [map_apply _ hf hi]
· simp only [map, dif_neg hf]
-- `smul_zero` does not work since we do not require `ContinuousAdd`
ext i
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_smul
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {v : VectorMeasure α M} {i : Set α} (c : R) :
(c • v).restrict i = c • v.restrict i := by
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· ext j hj
simp [restrict_apply _ hi hj]
· simp only [restrict_not_measurable _ hi]
-- `smul_zero` does not work since we do not require `ContinuousAdd`
ext j
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_smul
end
section
variable [MeasurableSpace β]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M] [ContinuousAdd M]
/-- `VectorMeasure.map` as a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def mapₗ (f : α → β) : VectorMeasure α M →ₗ[R] VectorMeasure β M where
toFun v := v.map f
map_add' _ _ := map_add _ _ f
map_smul' _ _ := map_smul _
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.mapₗ MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapₗ
/-- `VectorMeasure.restrict` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def restrictₗ (i : Set α) : VectorMeasure α M →ₗ[R] VectorMeasure α M where
toFun v := v.restrict i
map_add' _ _ := restrict_add _ _ i
map_smul' _ _ := restrict_smul _
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrictₗ MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrictₗ
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M]
/-- Vector measures over a partially ordered monoid is partially ordered.
This definition is consistent with `Measure.instPartialOrder`. -/
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (VectorMeasure α M) where
le v w := ∀ i, MeasurableSet i → v i ≤ w i
le_refl v i _ := le_rfl
le_trans u v w h₁ h₂ i hi := le_trans (h₁ i hi) (h₂ i hi)
le_antisymm v w h₁ h₂ := ext fun i hi => le_antisymm (h₁ i hi) (h₂ i hi)
variable {u v w : VectorMeasure α M}
theorem le_iff : v ≤ w ↔ ∀ i, MeasurableSet i → v i ≤ w i := Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.le_iff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.le_iff
theorem le_iff' : v ≤ w ↔ ∀ i, v i ≤ w i := by
refine ⟨fun h i => ?_, fun h i _ => h i⟩
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· exact h i hi
· rw [v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.le_iff' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.le_iff'
end
set_option quotPrecheck false in -- Porting note: error message suggested to do this
scoped[MeasureTheory]
notation:50 v " ≤[" i:50 "] " w:50 =>
MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict v i ≤ MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict w i
section
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M]
variable (v w : VectorMeasure α M)
theorem restrict_le_restrict_iff {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) :
v ≤[i] w ↔ ∀ ⦃j⦄, MeasurableSet j → j ⊆ i → v j ≤ w j :=
⟨fun h j hj₁ hj₂ => restrict_eq_self v hi hj₁ hj₂ ▸ restrict_eq_self w hi hj₁ hj₂ ▸ h j hj₁,
fun h => le_iff.1 fun _ hj =>
(restrict_apply v hi hj).symm ▸ (restrict_apply w hi hj).symm ▸
h (hj.inter hi) Set.inter_subset_right⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_restrict_iff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_restrict_iff
theorem subset_le_of_restrict_le_restrict {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] w)
{j : Set α} (hj : j ⊆ i) : v j ≤ w j := by
by_cases hj₁ : MeasurableSet j
· exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi).1 hi₂ hj₁ hj
· rw [v.not_measurable hj₁, w.not_measurable hj₁]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.subset_le_of_restrict_le_restrict MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.subset_le_of_restrict_le_restrict
theorem restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le {i : Set α}
(h : ∀ ⦃j⦄, MeasurableSet j → j ⊆ i → v j ≤ w j) : v ≤[i] w := by
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi).2 h
· rw [restrict_not_measurable v hi, restrict_not_measurable w hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le
theorem restrict_le_restrict_subset {i j : Set α} (hi₁ : MeasurableSet i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] w)
(hij : j ⊆ i) : v ≤[j] w :=
restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le v w fun _ _ hk₂ =>
subset_le_of_restrict_le_restrict v w hi₁ hi₂ (Set.Subset.trans hk₂ hij)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_restrict_subset MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_restrict_subset
theorem le_restrict_empty : v ≤[∅] w := by
intro j _
rw [restrict_empty, restrict_empty]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.le_restrict_empty MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.le_restrict_empty
theorem le_restrict_univ_iff_le : v ≤[Set.univ] w ↔ v ≤ w := by
constructor
· intro h s hs
have := h s hs
rwa [restrict_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ hs, Set.inter_univ,
restrict_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ hs, Set.inter_univ] at this
· intro h s hs
rw [restrict_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ hs, Set.inter_univ,
restrict_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ hs, Set.inter_univ]
exact h s hs
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.le_restrict_univ_iff_le MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.le_restrict_univ_iff_le
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [OrderedAddCommGroup M] [TopologicalAddGroup M]
variable (v w : VectorMeasure α M)
nonrec theorem neg_le_neg {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) (h : v ≤[i] w) : -w ≤[i] -v := by
intro j hj₁
rw [restrict_apply _ hi hj₁, restrict_apply _ hi hj₁, neg_apply, neg_apply]
refine neg_le_neg ?_
rw [← restrict_apply _ hi hj₁, ← restrict_apply _ hi hj₁]
exact h j hj₁
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.neg_le_neg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.neg_le_neg
@[simp]
theorem neg_le_neg_iff {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) : -w ≤[i] -v ↔ v ≤[i] w :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg v ▸ neg_neg w ▸ neg_le_neg _ _ hi h, fun h => neg_le_neg _ _ hi h⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.neg_le_neg_iff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.neg_le_neg_iff
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [OrderedAddCommMonoid M] [OrderClosedTopology M]
variable (v w : VectorMeasure α M) {i j : Set α}
theorem restrict_le_restrict_iUnion {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf₁ : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (f n))
(hf₂ : ∀ n, v ≤[f n] w) : v ≤[⋃ n, f n] w := by
refine restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le v w fun a ha₁ ha₂ => ?_
have ha₃ : ⋃ n, a ∩ disjointed f n = a := by
rwa [← Set.inter_iUnion, iUnion_disjointed, Set.inter_eq_left]
have ha₄ : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => a ∩ disjointed f n) :=
(disjoint_disjointed _).mono fun i j => Disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right
rw [← ha₃, v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat _ ha₄, w.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat _ ha₄]
· refine tsum_le_tsum (fun n => (restrict_le_restrict_iff v w (hf₁ n)).1 (hf₂ n) ?_ ?_) ?_ ?_
· exact ha₁.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hf₁ n)
· exact Set.Subset.trans Set.inter_subset_right (disjointed_subset _ _)
· refine (v.m_iUnion (fun n => ?_) ?_).summable
· exact ha₁.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hf₁ n)
· exact (disjoint_disjointed _).mono fun i j => Disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right
· refine (w.m_iUnion (fun n => ?_) ?_).summable
· exact ha₁.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hf₁ n)
· exact (disjoint_disjointed _).mono fun i j => Disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right
· intro n
exact ha₁.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hf₁ n)
· exact fun n => ha₁.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hf₁ n)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_restrict_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_restrict_iUnion
theorem restrict_le_restrict_countable_iUnion [Countable β] {f : β → Set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ b, MeasurableSet (f b)) (hf₂ : ∀ b, v ≤[f b] w) : v ≤[⋃ b, f b] w := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
rw [← Encodable.iUnion_decode₂]
refine restrict_le_restrict_iUnion v w ?_ ?_
· intro n
measurability
· intro n
cases' Encodable.decode₂ β n with b
· simp
· simp [hf₂ b]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_restrict_countable_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_restrict_countable_iUnion
theorem restrict_le_restrict_union (hi₁ : MeasurableSet i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] w) (hj₁ : MeasurableSet j)
(hj₂ : v ≤[j] w) : v ≤[i ∪ j] w := by
rw [Set.union_eq_iUnion]
refine restrict_le_restrict_countable_iUnion v w ?_ ?_
· measurability
· rintro (_ | _) <;> simpa
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_restrict_union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_restrict_union
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [OrderedAddCommMonoid M]
variable (v w : VectorMeasure α M) {i j : Set α}
theorem nonneg_of_zero_le_restrict (hi₂ : 0 ≤[i] v) : 0 ≤ v i := by
by_cases hi₁ : MeasurableSet i
· exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hi₁ Set.Subset.rfl
· rw [v.not_measurable hi₁]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.nonneg_of_zero_le_restrict MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.nonneg_of_zero_le_restrict
theorem nonpos_of_restrict_le_zero (hi₂ : v ≤[i] 0) : v i ≤ 0 := by
by_cases hi₁ : MeasurableSet i
· exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hi₁ Set.Subset.rfl
· rw [v.not_measurable hi₁]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.nonpos_of_restrict_le_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.nonpos_of_restrict_le_zero
theorem zero_le_restrict_not_measurable (hi : ¬MeasurableSet i) : 0 ≤[i] v := by
rw [restrict_zero, restrict_not_measurable _ hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.zero_le_restrict_not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.zero_le_restrict_not_measurable
theorem restrict_le_zero_of_not_measurable (hi : ¬MeasurableSet i) : v ≤[i] 0 := by
rw [restrict_zero, restrict_not_measurable _ hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_zero_of_not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_zero_of_not_measurable
theorem measurable_of_not_zero_le_restrict (hi : ¬0 ≤[i] v) : MeasurableSet i :=
Not.imp_symm (zero_le_restrict_not_measurable _) hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.measurable_of_not_zero_le_restrict MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.measurable_of_not_zero_le_restrict
theorem measurable_of_not_restrict_le_zero (hi : ¬v ≤[i] 0) : MeasurableSet i :=
Not.imp_symm (restrict_le_zero_of_not_measurable _) hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.measurable_of_not_restrict_le_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.measurable_of_not_restrict_le_zero
theorem zero_le_restrict_subset (hi₁ : MeasurableSet i) (hij : j ⊆ i) (hi₂ : 0 ≤[i] v) : 0 ≤[j] v :=
restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le _ _ fun _ hk₁ hk₂ =>
(restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hk₁ (Set.Subset.trans hk₂ hij)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.zero_le_restrict_subset MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.zero_le_restrict_subset
theorem restrict_le_zero_subset (hi₁ : MeasurableSet i) (hij : j ⊆ i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] 0) : v ≤[j] 0 :=
restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le _ _ fun _ hk₁ hk₂ =>
(restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hk₁ (Set.Subset.trans hk₂ hij)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_le_zero_subset MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_le_zero_subset
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid M]
variable (v w : VectorMeasure α M) {i j : Set α}
theorem exists_pos_measure_of_not_restrict_le_zero (hi : ¬v ≤[i] 0) :
∃ j : Set α, MeasurableSet j ∧ j ⊆ i ∧ 0 < v j := by
have hi₁ : MeasurableSet i := measurable_of_not_restrict_le_zero _ hi
rw [restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁] at hi
push_neg at hi
exact hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.exists_pos_measure_of_not_restrict_le_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.exists_pos_measure_of_not_restrict_le_zero
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M]
[CovariantClass M M (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] [ContinuousAdd M]
instance covariant_add_le :
CovariantClass (VectorMeasure α M) (VectorMeasure α M) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h i hi => add_le_add_left (h i hi) _⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.covariant_add_le MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.covariant_add_le
end
section
variable {L M N : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid L] [TopologicalSpace L] [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommMonoid N] [TopologicalSpace N]
/-- A vector measure `v` is absolutely continuous with respect to a measure `μ` if for all sets
`s`, `μ s = 0`, we have `v s = 0`. -/
def AbsolutelyContinuous (v : VectorMeasure α M) (w : VectorMeasure α N) :=
∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, w s = 0 → v s = 0
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.AbsolutelyContinuous
@[inherit_doc VectorMeasure.AbsolutelyContinuous]
scoped[MeasureTheory] infixl:50 " ≪ᵥ " => MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.AbsolutelyContinuous
open MeasureTheory
namespace AbsolutelyContinuous
variable {v : VectorMeasure α M} {w : VectorMeasure α N}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/VectorMeasure.lean | 1,053 | 1,057 | theorem mk (h : ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, MeasurableSet s → w s = 0 → v s = 0) : v ≪ᵥ w := by |
intro s hs
by_cases hmeas : MeasurableSet s
· exact h hmeas hs
· exact not_measurable v hmeas
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.order.group.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b599f4e4e5cf1fbcb4194503671d3d9e569c1fce"
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file develops the basics of ordered groups.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
class OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
#align ordered_add_comm_group OrderedAddCommGroup
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
class OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
#align ordered_comm_group OrderedCommGroup
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance OrderedCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := OrderedCommGroup.mul_le_mul_left b c bc a
#align ordered_comm_group.to_covariant_class_left_le OrderedCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_covariant_class_left_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) OrderedCommGroup.toOrderedCancelCommMonoid [OrderedCommGroup α] :
OrderedCancelCommMonoid α :=
{ ‹OrderedCommGroup α› with le_of_mul_le_mul_left := fun a b c ↦ le_of_mul_le_mul_left' }
#align ordered_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid OrderedCommGroup.toOrderedCancelCommMonoid
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid OrderedAddCommGroup.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
example (α : Type u) [OrderedAddCommGroup α] : CovariantClass α α (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
IsRightCancelAdd.covariant_swap_add_lt_of_covariant_swap_add_le α
-- Porting note: this instance is not used,
-- and causes timeouts after lean4#2210.
-- It was introduced in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/17564
-- but without the motivation clearly explained.
/-- A choice-free shortcut instance. -/
@[to_additive "A choice-free shortcut instance."]
theorem OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
ContravariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
#align ordered_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_left_le OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_left_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le
-- Porting note: this instance is not used,
-- and causes timeouts after lean4#2210.
-- See further explanation on `OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le`.
/-- A choice-free shortcut instance. -/
@[to_additive "A choice-free shortcut instance."]
theorem OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
ContravariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_right' bc a⁻¹
#align ordered_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_right_le OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_right_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le
section Group
variable [Group α]
section TypeclassesLeftLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.inv_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align left.inv_le_one_iff Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align left.neg_nonpos_iff Left.neg_nonpos_iff
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.one_le_inv_iff : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align left.one_le_inv_iff Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align left.nonneg_neg_iff Left.nonneg_neg_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le : b ≤ a⁻¹ * c ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align le_neg_add_iff_add_le le_neg_add_iff_add_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul : b⁻¹ * a ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left b, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul
#align neg_add_le_iff_le_add neg_add_le_iff_le_add
@[to_additive neg_le_iff_add_nonneg']
theorem inv_le_iff_one_le_mul' : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_left a).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align inv_le_iff_one_le_mul' inv_le_iff_one_le_mul'
#align neg_le_iff_add_nonneg' neg_le_iff_add_nonneg'
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b * a ≤ 1 :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_left b).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left
#align le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_left le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_left
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_mul_iff_le : 1 ≤ b⁻¹ * a ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left b, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align le_inv_mul_iff_le le_inv_mul_iff_le
#align le_neg_add_iff_le le_neg_add_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ * b ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a :=
-- Porting note: why is the `_root_` needed?
_root_.trans inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul <| by rw [mul_one]
#align inv_mul_le_one_iff inv_mul_le_one_iff
#align neg_add_nonpos_iff neg_add_nonpos_iff
end TypeclassesLeftLE
section TypeclassesLeftLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Left.neg_pos_iff "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.one_lt_inv_iff : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
#align left.one_lt_inv_iff Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align left.neg_pos_iff Left.neg_pos_iff
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.inv_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
#align left.inv_lt_one_iff Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align left.neg_neg_iff Left.neg_neg_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt : b < a⁻¹ * c ↔ a * b < c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul : b⁻¹ * a < c ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left b, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul' : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < a * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left a).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul' inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul'
#align neg_lt_iff_pos_add' neg_lt_iff_pos_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one' : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b * a < 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left b).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one' lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one'
#align lt_neg_iff_add_neg' lt_neg_iff_add_neg'
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_mul_iff_lt : 1 < b⁻¹ * a ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left b, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align lt_inv_mul_iff_lt lt_inv_mul_iff_lt
#align lt_neg_add_iff_lt lt_neg_add_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ * b < 1 ↔ b < a :=
_root_.trans inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul <| by rw [mul_one]
#align inv_mul_lt_one_iff inv_mul_lt_one_iff
#align neg_add_neg_iff neg_add_neg_iff
end TypeclassesLeftLT
section TypeclassesRightLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.inv_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right a]
simp
#align right.inv_le_one_iff Right.inv_le_one_iff
#align right.neg_nonpos_iff Right.neg_nonpos_iff
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.one_le_inv_iff : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right a]
simp
#align right.one_le_inv_iff Right.one_le_inv_iff
#align right.nonneg_neg_iff Right.nonneg_neg_iff
@[to_additive neg_le_iff_add_nonneg]
theorem inv_le_iff_one_le_mul : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ b * a :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right a).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align inv_le_iff_one_le_mul inv_le_iff_one_le_mul
#align neg_le_iff_add_nonneg neg_le_iff_add_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right
#align le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul
#align add_neg_le_iff_le_add add_neg_le_iff_le_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le : c ≤ a * b⁻¹ ↔ c * b ≤ a :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le
#align le_add_neg_iff_add_le le_add_neg_iff_add_le
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_one_iff_le : a * b⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul.trans <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_le_one_iff_le mul_inv_le_one_iff_le
#align add_neg_nonpos_iff_le add_neg_nonpos_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_inv_iff_le : 1 ≤ a * b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_mul_inv_iff_le le_mul_inv_iff_le
#align le_add_neg_iff_le le_add_neg_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_one_iff : b * a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a :=
_root_.trans mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_le_one_iff mul_inv_le_one_iff
#align add_neg_nonpos_iff add_neg_nonpos_iff
end TypeclassesRightLE
section TypeclassesRightLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.inv_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right a, inv_mul_self, one_mul]
#align right.inv_lt_one_iff Right.inv_lt_one_iff
#align right.neg_neg_iff Right.neg_neg_iff
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Right.neg_pos_iff "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.one_lt_inv_iff : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right a, inv_mul_self, one_mul]
#align right.one_lt_inv_iff Right.one_lt_inv_iff
#align right.neg_pos_iff Right.neg_pos_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < b * a :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right a).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul
#align neg_lt_iff_pos_add neg_lt_iff_pos_add
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one : a < b⁻¹ ↔ a * b < 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one
#align lt_neg_iff_add_neg lt_neg_iff_add_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < c * b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt : c < a * b⁻¹ ↔ c * b < a :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt : a * b⁻¹ < 1 ↔ a < b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, inv_mul_cancel_right, one_mul]
#align inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt
#align neg_add_neg_iff_lt neg_add_neg_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_inv_iff_lt : 1 < a * b⁻¹ ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_mul_inv_iff_lt lt_mul_inv_iff_lt
#align lt_add_neg_iff_lt lt_add_neg_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_one_iff : b * a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ b < a :=
_root_.trans mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_lt_one_iff mul_inv_lt_one_iff
#align add_neg_neg_iff add_neg_neg_iff
end TypeclassesRightLT
section TypeclassesLeftRightLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)]
{a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_inv_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a, ← mul_le_mul_iff_right b]
simp
#align inv_le_inv_iff inv_le_inv_iff
#align neg_le_neg_iff neg_le_neg_iff
alias ⟨le_of_neg_le_neg, _⟩ := neg_le_neg_iff
#align le_of_neg_le_neg le_of_neg_le_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff : a * b⁻¹ ≤ d⁻¹ * c ↔ d * a ≤ c * b := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left d, ← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff
#align add_neg_le_neg_add_iff add_neg_le_neg_add_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_le_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a / b ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ b := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_le_self_iff div_le_self_iff
#align sub_le_self_iff sub_le_self_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_div_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ 1 := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align le_div_self_iff le_div_self_iff
#align le_sub_self_iff le_sub_self_iff
alias ⟨_, sub_le_self⟩ := sub_le_self_iff
#align sub_le_self sub_le_self
end TypeclassesLeftRightLE
section TypeclassesLeftRightLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)]
{a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_inv_iff : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b]
simp
#align inv_lt_inv_iff inv_lt_inv_iff
#align neg_lt_neg_iff neg_lt_neg_iff
@[to_additive neg_lt]
theorem inv_lt' : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by rw [← inv_lt_inv_iff, inv_inv]
#align inv_lt' inv_lt'
#align neg_lt neg_lt
@[to_additive lt_neg]
theorem lt_inv' : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_lt_inv_iff, inv_inv]
#align lt_inv' lt_inv'
#align lt_neg lt_neg
alias ⟨lt_inv_of_lt_inv, _⟩ := lt_inv'
#align lt_inv_of_lt_inv lt_inv_of_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive] lt_inv_of_lt_inv
#align lt_neg_of_lt_neg lt_neg_of_lt_neg
alias ⟨inv_lt_of_inv_lt', _⟩ := inv_lt'
#align inv_lt_of_inv_lt' inv_lt_of_inv_lt'
attribute [to_additive neg_lt_of_neg_lt] inv_lt_of_inv_lt'
#align neg_lt_of_neg_lt neg_lt_of_neg_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff : a * b⁻¹ < d⁻¹ * c ↔ d * a < c * b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left d, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff
#align add_neg_lt_neg_add_iff add_neg_lt_neg_add_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_lt_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a / b < a ↔ 1 < b := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_lt_self_iff div_lt_self_iff
#align sub_lt_self_iff sub_lt_self_iff
alias ⟨_, sub_lt_self⟩ := sub_lt_self_iff
#align sub_lt_self sub_lt_self
end TypeclassesLeftRightLT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LeftLE
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.inv_le_self (h : 1 ≤ a) : a⁻¹ ≤ a :=
le_trans (Left.inv_le_one_iff.mpr h) h
#align left.inv_le_self Left.inv_le_self
#align left.neg_le_self Left.neg_le_self
alias neg_le_self := Left.neg_le_self
#align neg_le_self neg_le_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.self_le_inv (h : a ≤ 1) : a ≤ a⁻¹ :=
le_trans h (Left.one_le_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align left.self_le_inv Left.self_le_inv
#align left.self_le_neg Left.self_le_neg
end LeftLE
section LeftLT
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.inv_lt_self (h : 1 < a) : a⁻¹ < a :=
(Left.inv_lt_one_iff.mpr h).trans h
#align left.inv_lt_self Left.inv_lt_self
#align left.neg_lt_self Left.neg_lt_self
alias neg_lt_self := Left.neg_lt_self
#align neg_lt_self neg_lt_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.self_lt_inv (h : a < 1) : a < a⁻¹ :=
lt_trans h (Left.one_lt_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align left.self_lt_inv Left.self_lt_inv
#align left.self_lt_neg Left.self_lt_neg
end LeftLT
section RightLE
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.inv_le_self (h : 1 ≤ a) : a⁻¹ ≤ a :=
le_trans (Right.inv_le_one_iff.mpr h) h
#align right.inv_le_self Right.inv_le_self
#align right.neg_le_self Right.neg_le_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.self_le_inv (h : a ≤ 1) : a ≤ a⁻¹ :=
le_trans h (Right.one_le_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align right.self_le_inv Right.self_le_inv
#align right.self_le_neg Right.self_le_neg
end RightLE
section RightLT
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.inv_lt_self (h : 1 < a) : a⁻¹ < a :=
(Right.inv_lt_one_iff.mpr h).trans h
#align right.inv_lt_self Right.inv_lt_self
#align right.neg_lt_self Right.neg_lt_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.self_lt_inv (h : a < 1) : a < a⁻¹ :=
lt_trans h (Right.one_lt_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align right.self_lt_inv Right.self_lt_inv
#align right.self_lt_neg Right.self_lt_neg
end RightLT
end Preorder
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul' : c⁻¹ * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul' inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul'
#align neg_add_le_iff_le_add' neg_add_le_iff_le_add'
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `a ≤ c * b`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul' : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul' mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul'
#align add_neg_le_iff_le_add' add_neg_le_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive add_neg_le_add_neg_iff]
theorem mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff' : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d ≤ c * b := by
rw [mul_comm c, mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff' mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff'
#align add_neg_le_add_neg_iff add_neg_le_add_neg_iff
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul' : c⁻¹ * a < b ↔ a < b * c := by rw [inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul' inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul'
#align neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add' neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add'
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `a < c * b`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul' : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul' mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul'
#align add_neg_lt_iff_le_add' add_neg_lt_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff]
theorem mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff' : a * b⁻¹ < c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d < c * b := by
rw [mul_comm c, mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff' mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff'
#align add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff
end LT
end CommGroup
alias ⟨one_le_of_inv_le_one, _⟩ := Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align one_le_of_inv_le_one one_le_of_inv_le_one
attribute [to_additive] one_le_of_inv_le_one
#align nonneg_of_neg_nonpos nonneg_of_neg_nonpos
alias ⟨le_one_of_one_le_inv, _⟩ := Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align le_one_of_one_le_inv le_one_of_one_le_inv
attribute [to_additive nonpos_of_neg_nonneg] le_one_of_one_le_inv
#align nonpos_of_neg_nonneg nonpos_of_neg_nonneg
alias ⟨lt_of_inv_lt_inv, _⟩ := inv_lt_inv_iff
#align lt_of_inv_lt_inv lt_of_inv_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive] lt_of_inv_lt_inv
#align lt_of_neg_lt_neg lt_of_neg_lt_neg
alias ⟨one_lt_of_inv_lt_one, _⟩ := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align one_lt_of_inv_lt_one one_lt_of_inv_lt_one
attribute [to_additive] one_lt_of_inv_lt_one
#align pos_of_neg_neg pos_of_neg_neg
alias inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt
attribute [to_additive] inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt
#align neg_neg_iff_pos neg_neg_iff_pos
alias inv_lt_one' := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align inv_lt_one' inv_lt_one'
attribute [to_additive neg_lt_zero] inv_lt_one'
#align neg_lt_zero neg_lt_zero
alias ⟨inv_of_one_lt_inv, _⟩ := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align inv_of_one_lt_inv inv_of_one_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_of_neg_pos] inv_of_one_lt_inv
#align neg_of_neg_pos neg_of_neg_pos
alias ⟨_, one_lt_inv_of_inv⟩ := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align one_lt_inv_of_inv one_lt_inv_of_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_pos_of_neg] one_lt_inv_of_inv
#align neg_pos_of_neg neg_pos_of_neg
alias ⟨mul_le_of_le_inv_mul, _⟩ := le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align mul_le_of_le_inv_mul mul_le_of_le_inv_mul
attribute [to_additive] mul_le_of_le_inv_mul
#align add_le_of_le_neg_add add_le_of_le_neg_add
alias ⟨_, le_inv_mul_of_mul_le⟩ := le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align le_inv_mul_of_mul_le le_inv_mul_of_mul_le
attribute [to_additive] le_inv_mul_of_mul_le
#align le_neg_add_of_add_le le_neg_add_of_add_le
alias ⟨_, inv_mul_le_of_le_mul⟩ := inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul
#align inv_mul_le_of_le_mul inv_mul_le_of_le_mul
-- Porting note: was `inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul`
attribute [to_additive] inv_mul_le_of_le_mul
alias ⟨mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul, _⟩ := lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul
attribute [to_additive] mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul
#align add_lt_of_lt_neg_add add_lt_of_lt_neg_add
alias ⟨_, lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt⟩ := lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt
attribute [to_additive] lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt
#align lt_neg_add_of_add_lt lt_neg_add_of_add_lt
alias ⟨lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt, inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul⟩ := inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul
attribute [to_additive] lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align lt_add_of_neg_add_lt lt_add_of_neg_add_lt
attribute [to_additive] inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul
#align neg_add_lt_of_lt_add neg_add_lt_of_lt_add
alias lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left := lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left
attribute [to_additive] lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left
#align lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left
alias inv_le_one' := Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align inv_le_one' inv_le_one'
attribute [to_additive neg_nonpos] inv_le_one'
#align neg_nonpos neg_nonpos
alias one_le_inv' := Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align one_le_inv' one_le_inv'
attribute [to_additive neg_nonneg] one_le_inv'
#align neg_nonneg neg_nonneg
alias one_lt_inv' := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align one_lt_inv' one_lt_inv'
attribute [to_additive neg_pos] one_lt_inv'
#align neg_pos neg_pos
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.mul_lt_mul_left' OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_add_comm_group.add_lt_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.le_of_mul_le_mul_left OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
#align ordered_add_comm_group.le_of_add_le_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.le_of_add_le_add_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
#align ordered_add_comm_group.lt_of_add_lt_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.lt_of_add_lt_add_left
-- Most of the lemmas that are primed in this section appear in ordered_field.
-- I (DT) did not try to minimise the assumptions.
section Group
variable [Group α] [LE α]
section Right
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_div_iff_right (c : α) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_le_mul_iff_right _
#align div_le_div_iff_right div_le_div_iff_right
#align sub_le_sub_iff_right sub_le_sub_iff_right
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub_right]
theorem div_le_div_right' (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
(div_le_div_iff_right c).2 h
#align div_le_div_right' div_le_div_right'
#align sub_le_sub_right sub_le_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_nonneg]
theorem one_le_div' : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align one_le_div' one_le_div'
#align sub_nonneg sub_nonneg
alias ⟨le_of_sub_nonneg, sub_nonneg_of_le⟩ := sub_nonneg
#align sub_nonneg_of_le sub_nonneg_of_le
#align le_of_sub_nonneg le_of_sub_nonneg
@[to_additive sub_nonpos]
theorem div_le_one' : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_le_one' div_le_one'
#align sub_nonpos sub_nonpos
alias ⟨le_of_sub_nonpos, sub_nonpos_of_le⟩ := sub_nonpos
#align sub_nonpos_of_le sub_nonpos_of_le
#align le_of_sub_nonpos le_of_sub_nonpos
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le : a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_div_iff_mul_le le_div_iff_mul_le
#align le_sub_iff_add_le le_sub_iff_add_le
alias ⟨add_le_of_le_sub_right, le_sub_right_of_add_le⟩ := le_sub_iff_add_le
#align add_le_of_le_sub_right add_le_of_le_sub_right
#align le_sub_right_of_add_le le_sub_right_of_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_iff_le_mul : a / c ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right c, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_le_iff_le_mul div_le_iff_le_mul
#align sub_le_iff_le_add sub_le_iff_le_add
-- Note: we intentionally don't have `@[simp]` for the additive version,
-- since the LHS simplifies with `tsub_le_iff_right`
attribute [simp] div_le_iff_le_mul
-- TODO: Should we get rid of `sub_le_iff_le_add` in favor of
-- (a renamed version of) `tsub_le_iff_right`?
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) AddGroup.toHasOrderedSub {α : Type*} [AddGroup α] [LE α]
[CovariantClass α α (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·)] : OrderedSub α :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => sub_le_iff_le_add⟩
#align add_group.to_has_ordered_sub AddGroup.toHasOrderedSub
end Right
section Left
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_div_iff_left (a : α) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_le_mul_iff_left a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_left,
inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_le_inv_iff]
#align div_le_div_iff_left div_le_div_iff_left
#align sub_le_sub_iff_left sub_le_sub_iff_left
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub_left]
theorem div_le_div_left' (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
(div_le_div_iff_left c).2 h
#align div_le_div_left' div_le_div_left'
#align sub_le_sub_left sub_le_sub_left
end Left
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive sub_le_sub_iff]
theorem div_le_div_iff' : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff'
#align div_le_div_iff' div_le_div_iff'
#align sub_le_sub_iff sub_le_sub_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le' : b ≤ c / a ↔ a * b ≤ c := by rw [le_div_iff_mul_le, mul_comm]
#align le_div_iff_mul_le' le_div_iff_mul_le'
#align le_sub_iff_add_le' le_sub_iff_add_le'
alias ⟨add_le_of_le_sub_left, le_sub_left_of_add_le⟩ := le_sub_iff_add_le'
#align le_sub_left_of_add_le le_sub_left_of_add_le
#align add_le_of_le_sub_left add_le_of_le_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_iff_le_mul' : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align div_le_iff_le_mul' div_le_iff_le_mul'
#align sub_le_iff_le_add' sub_le_iff_le_add'
alias ⟨le_add_of_sub_left_le, sub_left_le_of_le_add⟩ := sub_le_iff_le_add'
#align sub_left_le_of_le_add sub_left_le_of_le_add
#align le_add_of_sub_left_le le_add_of_sub_left_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_div_iff_le_mul : b⁻¹ ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ a * b :=
le_div_iff_mul_le.trans inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul'
#align inv_le_div_iff_le_mul inv_le_div_iff_le_mul
#align neg_le_sub_iff_le_add neg_le_sub_iff_le_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_div_iff_le_mul' : a⁻¹ ≤ b / c ↔ c ≤ a * b := by rw [inv_le_div_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_le_div_iff_le_mul' inv_le_div_iff_le_mul'
#align neg_le_sub_iff_le_add' neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_comm : a / b ≤ c ↔ a / c ≤ b :=
div_le_iff_le_mul'.trans div_le_iff_le_mul.symm
#align div_le_comm div_le_comm
#align sub_le_comm sub_le_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_comm : a ≤ b / c ↔ c ≤ b / a :=
le_div_iff_mul_le'.trans le_div_iff_mul_le.symm
#align le_div_comm le_div_comm
#align le_sub_comm le_sub_comm
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub]
theorem div_le_div'' (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a / d ≤ b / c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm b, mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
exact mul_le_mul' hab hcd
#align div_le_div'' div_le_div''
#align sub_le_sub sub_le_sub
end Preorder
end CommGroup
-- Most of the lemmas that are primed in this section appear in ordered_field.
-- I (DT) did not try to minimise the assumptions.
section Group
variable [Group α] [LT α]
section Right
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_lt_div_iff_right (c : α) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_lt_mul_iff_right _
#align div_lt_div_iff_right div_lt_div_iff_right
#align sub_lt_sub_iff_right sub_lt_sub_iff_right
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_lt_sub_right]
theorem div_lt_div_right' (h : a < b) (c : α) : a / c < b / c :=
(div_lt_div_iff_right c).2 h
#align div_lt_div_right' div_lt_div_right'
#align sub_lt_sub_right sub_lt_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_pos]
theorem one_lt_div' : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align one_lt_div' one_lt_div'
#align sub_pos sub_pos
alias ⟨lt_of_sub_pos, sub_pos_of_lt⟩ := sub_pos
#align lt_of_sub_pos lt_of_sub_pos
#align sub_pos_of_lt sub_pos_of_lt
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_neg "For `a - -b = a + b`, see `sub_neg_eq_add`."]
theorem div_lt_one' : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_lt_one' div_lt_one'
#align sub_neg sub_neg
alias ⟨lt_of_sub_neg, sub_neg_of_lt⟩ := sub_neg
#align lt_of_sub_neg lt_of_sub_neg
#align sub_neg_of_lt sub_neg_of_lt
alias sub_lt_zero := sub_neg
#align sub_lt_zero sub_lt_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt : a < c / b ↔ a * b < c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_div_iff_mul_lt lt_div_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_sub_iff_add_lt lt_sub_iff_add_lt
alias ⟨add_lt_of_lt_sub_right, lt_sub_right_of_add_lt⟩ := lt_sub_iff_add_lt
#align add_lt_of_lt_sub_right add_lt_of_lt_sub_right
#align lt_sub_right_of_add_lt lt_sub_right_of_add_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul : a / c < b ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right c, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_lt_iff_lt_mul div_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align sub_lt_iff_lt_add sub_lt_iff_lt_add
alias ⟨lt_add_of_sub_right_lt, sub_right_lt_of_lt_add⟩ := sub_lt_iff_lt_add
#align lt_add_of_sub_right_lt lt_add_of_sub_right_lt
#align sub_right_lt_of_lt_add sub_right_lt_of_lt_add
end Right
section Left
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)]
{a b c : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_lt_div_iff_left (a : α) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_left,
inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_lt_inv_iff]
#align div_lt_div_iff_left div_lt_div_iff_left
#align sub_lt_sub_iff_left sub_lt_sub_iff_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul : a⁻¹ < b / c ↔ c < a * b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt, inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul]
#align inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul
#align neg_lt_sub_iff_lt_add neg_lt_sub_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_lt_sub_left]
theorem div_lt_div_left' (h : a < b) (c : α) : c / b < c / a :=
(div_lt_div_iff_left c).2 h
#align div_lt_div_left' div_lt_div_left'
#align sub_lt_sub_left sub_lt_sub_left
end Left
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive sub_lt_sub_iff]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 968 | 969 | theorem div_lt_div_iff' : a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b := by |
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
#align_import data.set.ncard from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74c2af38a828107941029b03839882c5c6f87a04"
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `PartENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := PartENat.withTopEquiv (PartENat.card s)
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, PartENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = PartENat.withTopEquiv (PartENat.card α) := by
rw [encard, PartENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, PartENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card,
PartENat.withTopEquiv_natCast, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) : encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ← PartENat.withTopEquiv.symm.injective.eq_iff, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
PartENat.withTopEquiv_symm_top, PartENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ← PartENat.withTopEquiv.symm.injective.eq_iff, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
PartENat.withTopEquiv_symm_zero, PartENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype,
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ← PartENat.withTopEquiv.symm.injective.eq_iff, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
PartENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]; rfl
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
have e := (Equiv.Set.union (by rwa [subset_empty_iff, ← disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty])).symm
simp [encard, ← PartENat.card_congr e, PartENat.card_sum, PartENat.withTopEquiv]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
refine h.induction_on (by simp) ?_
rintro a t hat _ ht'
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_card (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_card
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_cancel_iff h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (ht : t.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne (fun he ↦ h.ne (ht.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le))
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_card inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_cancel_iff WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_cancel_iff WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left (hfin.diff _).encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_cancel_iff WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_cancel_iff (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_cancel_iff WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm,
WithTop.add_left_cancel_iff hs.encard_lt_top.ne, encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 363 | 375 | theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by |
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import probability.kernel.integral_comp_prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0d694db494dd4f9aa57f2714b6e4c82b4ebc113"
/-!
# Bochner integral of a function against the composition-product of two kernels
We prove properties of the composition-product of two kernels. If `κ` is an s-finite kernel from
`α` to `β` and `η` is an s-finite kernel from `α × β` to `γ`, we can form their composition-product
`κ ⊗ₖ η : kernel α (β × γ)`. We proved in `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_compProd` that it
verifies `∫⁻ bc, f bc ∂((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) = ∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ c, f (b, c) ∂(η (a, b)) ∂(κ a)`. In this file, we
prove the same equality for the Bochner integral.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.integral_compProd`: the integral against the composition-product is
`∫ z, f z ∂((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) = ∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂(η (a, x)) ∂(κ a)`
## Implementation details
This file is to a large extent a copy of part of
`Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Prod/Basic.lean`. The product of
two measures is a particular case of composition-product of kernels and it turns out that once the
measurablity of the Lebesgue integral of a kernel is proved, almost all proofs about integrals
against products of measures extend with minimal modifications to the composition-product of two
kernels.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal MeasureTheory Filter ProbabilityTheory ProbabilityTheory.kernel
variable {α β γ E : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
{mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {κ : kernel α β} [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
{η : kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η] {a : α}
namespace ProbabilityTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/IntegralCompProd.lean | 48 | 61 | theorem hasFiniteIntegral_prod_mk_left (a : α) {s : Set (β × γ)} (h2s : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s ≠ ∞) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun b => (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal) (κ a) := by |
let t := toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg]
calc
∫⁻ b, ENNReal.ofReal (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal ∂κ a
_ ≤ ∫⁻ b, η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' t) ∂κ a := by
refine lintegral_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [ae_kernel_lt_top a h2s] with b hb
rw [ofReal_toReal hb.ne]
exact measure_mono (preimage_mono (subset_toMeasurable _ _))
_ ≤ (κ ⊗ₖ η) a t := le_compProd_apply _ _ _ _
_ = (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s := measure_toMeasurable s
_ < ⊤ := h2s.lt_top
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Baire.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Baire.CompleteMetrizable
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
#align_import analysis.normed_space.banach from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Banach open mapping theorem
This file contains the Banach open mapping theorem, i.e., the fact that a bijective
bounded linear map between Banach spaces has a bounded inverse.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Function Metric Set Filter Finset Topology NNReal
open LinearMap (range ker)
variable {𝕜 𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] {σ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜'}
{σ' : 𝕜' →+* 𝕜} [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] [RingHomInvPair σ' σ] [RingHomIsometric σ]
[RingHomIsometric σ']
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F] (f : E →SL[σ] F)
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
/-- A (possibly nonlinear) right inverse to a continuous linear map, which doesn't have to be
linear itself but which satisfies a bound `‖inverse x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. A surjective continuous linear
map doesn't always have a continuous linear right inverse, but it always has a nonlinear inverse
in this sense, by Banach's open mapping theorem. -/
structure NonlinearRightInverse where
toFun : F → E
nnnorm : ℝ≥0
bound' : ∀ y, ‖toFun y‖ ≤ nnnorm * ‖y‖
right_inv' : ∀ y, f (toFun y) = y
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse
instance : CoeFun (NonlinearRightInverse f) fun _ => F → E :=
⟨fun fsymm => fsymm.toFun⟩
@[simp]
theorem NonlinearRightInverse.right_inv {f : E →SL[σ] F} (fsymm : NonlinearRightInverse f) (y : F) :
f (fsymm y) = y :=
fsymm.right_inv' y
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse.right_inv ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse.right_inv
theorem NonlinearRightInverse.bound {f : E →SL[σ] F} (fsymm : NonlinearRightInverse f) (y : F) :
‖fsymm y‖ ≤ fsymm.nnnorm * ‖y‖ :=
fsymm.bound' y
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse.bound ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse.bound
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-- Given a continuous linear equivalence, the inverse is in particular an instance of
`ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse` (which turns out to be linear). -/
noncomputable def ContinuousLinearEquiv.toNonlinearRightInverse (f : E ≃SL[σ] F) :
ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse (f : E →SL[σ] F) where
toFun := f.invFun
nnnorm := ‖(f.symm : F →SL[σ'] E)‖₊
bound' _ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm (f.symm : F →SL[σ'] E) _
right_inv' := f.apply_symm_apply
#align continuous_linear_equiv.to_nonlinear_right_inverse ContinuousLinearEquiv.toNonlinearRightInverse
noncomputable instance (f : E ≃SL[σ] F) :
Inhabited (ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse (f : E →SL[σ] F)) :=
⟨f.toNonlinearRightInverse⟩
/-! ### Proof of the Banach open mapping theorem -/
variable [CompleteSpace F]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
/-- First step of the proof of the Banach open mapping theorem (using completeness of `F`):
by Baire's theorem, there exists a ball in `E` whose image closure has nonempty interior.
Rescaling everything, it follows that any `y ∈ F` is arbitrarily well approached by
images of elements of norm at most `C * ‖y‖`.
For further use, we will only need such an element whose image
is within distance `‖y‖/2` of `y`, to apply an iterative process. -/
theorem exists_approx_preimage_norm_le (surj : Surjective f) :
∃ C ≥ 0, ∀ y, ∃ x, dist (f x) y ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ ∧ ‖x‖ ≤ C * ‖y‖ := by
have A : ⋃ n : ℕ, closure (f '' ball 0 n) = Set.univ := by
refine Subset.antisymm (subset_univ _) fun y _ => ?_
rcases surj y with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases exists_nat_gt ‖x‖ with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, subset_closure ?_⟩
refine (mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨x, ⟨?_, hx⟩⟩
rwa [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero]
have : ∃ (n : ℕ) (x : _), x ∈ interior (closure (f '' ball 0 n)) :=
nonempty_interior_of_iUnion_of_closed (fun n => isClosed_closure) A
simp only [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, Metric.mem_nhds_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨n, a, ε, ⟨εpos, H⟩⟩
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
refine ⟨(ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * 2 * n, by positivity, fun y => ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy
· use 0
simp
· have hc' : 1 < ‖σ c‖ := by simp only [RingHomIsometric.is_iso, hc]
rcases rescale_to_shell hc' (half_pos εpos) hy with ⟨d, hd, ydlt, -, dinv⟩
let δ := ‖d‖ * ‖y‖ / 4
have δpos : 0 < δ := div_pos (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hd) (norm_pos_iff.2 hy)) (by norm_num)
have : a + d • y ∈ ball a ε := by
simp [dist_eq_norm, lt_of_le_of_lt ydlt.le (half_lt_self εpos)]
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 (H this) _ δpos with ⟨z₁, z₁im, h₁⟩
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 z₁im with ⟨x₁, hx₁, xz₁⟩
rw [← xz₁] at h₁
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] at hx₁
have : a ∈ ball a ε := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_self]
exact εpos
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 (H this) _ δpos with ⟨z₂, z₂im, h₂⟩
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 z₂im with ⟨x₂, hx₂, xz₂⟩
rw [← xz₂] at h₂
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] at hx₂
let x := x₁ - x₂
have I : ‖f x - d • y‖ ≤ 2 * δ :=
calc
‖f x - d • y‖ = ‖f x₁ - (a + d • y) - (f x₂ - a)‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [f.map_sub]
abel
_ ≤ ‖f x₁ - (a + d • y)‖ + ‖f x₂ - a‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ δ + δ := by rw [dist_eq_norm'] at h₁ h₂; gcongr
_ = 2 * δ := (two_mul _).symm
have J : ‖f (σ' d⁻¹ • x) - y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖f (σ' d⁻¹ • x) - y‖ = ‖d⁻¹ • f x - (d⁻¹ * d) • y‖ := by
rwa [f.map_smulₛₗ _, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul, map_inv₀, map_inv₀,
RingHomCompTriple.comp_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
_ = ‖d⁻¹ • (f x - d • y)‖ := by rw [mul_smul, smul_sub]
_ = ‖d‖⁻¹ * ‖f x - d • y‖ := by rw [norm_smul, norm_inv]
_ ≤ ‖d‖⁻¹ * (2 * δ) := by gcongr
_ = ‖d‖⁻¹ * ‖d‖ * ‖y‖ / 2 := by
simp only [δ]
ring
_ = ‖y‖ / 2 := by
rw [inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
simp [norm_eq_zero, hd]
_ = 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ := by ring
rw [← dist_eq_norm] at J
have K : ‖σ' d⁻¹ • x‖ ≤ (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * 2 * ↑n * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖σ' d⁻¹ • x‖ = ‖d‖⁻¹ * ‖x₁ - x₂‖ := by rw [norm_smul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso, norm_inv]
_ ≤ (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * ‖y‖ * (n + n) := by
gcongr
· simpa using dinv
· exact le_trans (norm_sub_le _ _) (by gcongr)
_ = (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * 2 * ↑n * ‖y‖ := by ring
exact ⟨σ' d⁻¹ • x, J, K⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.exists_approx_preimage_norm_le ContinuousLinearMap.exists_approx_preimage_norm_le
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- The Banach open mapping theorem: if a bounded linear map between Banach spaces is onto, then
any point has a preimage with controlled norm. -/
theorem exists_preimage_norm_le (surj : Surjective f) :
∃ C > 0, ∀ y, ∃ x, f x = y ∧ ‖x‖ ≤ C * ‖y‖ := by
obtain ⟨C, C0, hC⟩ := exists_approx_preimage_norm_le f surj
/- Second step of the proof: starting from `y`, we want an exact preimage of `y`. Let `g y` be
the approximate preimage of `y` given by the first step, and `h y = y - f(g y)` the part that
has no preimage yet. We will iterate this process, taking the approximate preimage of `h y`,
leaving only `h^2 y` without preimage yet, and so on. Let `u n` be the approximate preimage
of `h^n y`. Then `u` is a converging series, and by design the sum of the series is a
preimage of `y`. This uses completeness of `E`. -/
choose g hg using hC
let h y := y - f (g y)
have hle : ∀ y, ‖h y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ := by
intro y
rw [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm]
exact (hg y).1
refine ⟨2 * C + 1, by linarith, fun y => ?_⟩
have hnle : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖h^[n] y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n * ‖y‖ := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [one_div, Nat.zero_eq, one_mul, iterate_zero_apply, pow_zero, le_rfl]
· rw [iterate_succ']
apply le_trans (hle _) _
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc]
gcongr
let u n := g (h^[n] y)
have ule : ∀ n, ‖u n‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n * (C * ‖y‖) := fun n ↦ by
apply le_trans (hg _).2
calc
C * ‖h^[n] y‖ ≤ C * ((1 / 2) ^ n * ‖y‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hnle n) C0
_ = (1 / 2) ^ n * (C * ‖y‖) := by ring
have sNu : Summable fun n => ‖u n‖ := by
refine .of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => norm_nonneg _) ule ?_
exact Summable.mul_right _ (summable_geometric_of_lt_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
have su : Summable u := sNu.of_norm
let x := tsum u
have x_ineq : ‖x‖ ≤ (2 * C + 1) * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖x‖ ≤ ∑' n, ‖u n‖ := norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm sNu
_ ≤ ∑' n, (1 / 2) ^ n * (C * ‖y‖) :=
tsum_le_tsum ule sNu (Summable.mul_right _ summable_geometric_two)
_ = (∑' n, (1 / 2) ^ n) * (C * ‖y‖) := tsum_mul_right
_ = 2 * C * ‖y‖ := by rw [tsum_geometric_two, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ 2 * C * ‖y‖ + ‖y‖ := le_add_of_nonneg_right (norm_nonneg y)
_ = (2 * C + 1) * ‖y‖ := by ring
have fsumeq : ∀ n : ℕ, f (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, u i) = y - h^[n] y := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp [f.map_zero]
· rw [sum_range_succ, f.map_add, IH, iterate_succ_apply', sub_add]
have : Tendsto (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, u i) atTop (𝓝 x) := su.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat
have L₁ : Tendsto (fun n => f (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, u i)) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
(f.continuous.tendsto _).comp this
simp only [fsumeq] at L₁
have L₂ : Tendsto (fun n => y - h^[n] y) atTop (𝓝 (y - 0)) := by
refine tendsto_const_nhds.sub ?_
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
simp only [sub_zero]
refine squeeze_zero (fun _ => norm_nonneg _) hnle ?_
rw [← zero_mul ‖y‖]
refine (_root_.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one ?_ ?_).mul tendsto_const_nhds <;> norm_num
have feq : f x = y - 0 := tendsto_nhds_unique L₁ L₂
rw [sub_zero] at feq
exact ⟨x, feq, x_ineq⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.exists_preimage_norm_le ContinuousLinearMap.exists_preimage_norm_le
/-- The Banach open mapping theorem: a surjective bounded linear map between Banach spaces is
open. -/
protected theorem isOpenMap (surj : Surjective f) : IsOpenMap f := by
intro s hs
rcases exists_preimage_norm_le f surj with ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩
refine isOpen_iff.2 fun y yfs => ?_
rcases yfs with ⟨x, xs, fxy⟩
rcases isOpen_iff.1 hs x xs with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
refine ⟨ε / C, div_pos εpos Cpos, fun z hz => ?_⟩
rcases hC (z - y) with ⟨w, wim, wnorm⟩
have : f (x + w) = z := by rw [f.map_add, wim, fxy, add_sub_cancel]
rw [← this]
have : x + w ∈ ball x ε :=
calc
dist (x + w) x = ‖w‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm]
simp
_ ≤ C * ‖z - y‖ := wnorm
_ < C * (ε / C) := by
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ Cpos
rwa [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hz
_ = ε := mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt Cpos)
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (hε this)
#align continuous_linear_map.is_open_map ContinuousLinearMap.isOpenMap
protected theorem quotientMap (surj : Surjective f) : QuotientMap f :=
(f.isOpenMap surj).to_quotientMap f.continuous surj
#align continuous_linear_map.quotient_map ContinuousLinearMap.quotientMap
theorem _root_.AffineMap.isOpenMap {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
[CompleteSpace F] {P Q : Type*} [MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor E P] [MetricSpace Q]
[NormedAddTorsor F Q] (f : P →ᵃ[𝕜] Q) (hf : Continuous f) (surj : Surjective f) :
IsOpenMap f :=
AffineMap.isOpenMap_linear_iff.mp <|
ContinuousLinearMap.isOpenMap { f.linear with cont := AffineMap.continuous_linear_iff.mpr hf }
(f.linear_surjective_iff.mpr surj)
#align affine_map.is_open_map AffineMap.isOpenMap
/-! ### Applications of the Banach open mapping theorem -/
theorem interior_preimage (hsurj : Surjective f) (s : Set F) :
interior (f ⁻¹' s) = f ⁻¹' interior s :=
((f.isOpenMap hsurj).preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage f.continuous s).symm
#align continuous_linear_map.interior_preimage ContinuousLinearMap.interior_preimage
theorem closure_preimage (hsurj : Surjective f) (s : Set F) : closure (f ⁻¹' s) = f ⁻¹' closure s :=
((f.isOpenMap hsurj).preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage f.continuous s).symm
#align continuous_linear_map.closure_preimage ContinuousLinearMap.closure_preimage
theorem frontier_preimage (hsurj : Surjective f) (s : Set F) :
frontier (f ⁻¹' s) = f ⁻¹' frontier s :=
((f.isOpenMap hsurj).preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage f.continuous s).symm
#align continuous_linear_map.frontier_preimage ContinuousLinearMap.frontier_preimage
theorem exists_nonlinearRightInverse_of_surjective (f : E →SL[σ] F)
(hsurj : LinearMap.range f = ⊤) :
∃ fsymm : NonlinearRightInverse f, 0 < fsymm.nnnorm := by
choose C hC fsymm h using exists_preimage_norm_le _ (LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp hsurj)
use {
toFun := fsymm
nnnorm := ⟨C, hC.lt.le⟩
bound' := fun y => (h y).2
right_inv' := fun y => (h y).1 }
exact hC
#align continuous_linear_map.exists_nonlinear_right_inverse_of_surjective ContinuousLinearMap.exists_nonlinearRightInverse_of_surjective
/-- A surjective continuous linear map between Banach spaces admits a (possibly nonlinear)
controlled right inverse. In general, it is not possible to ensure that such a right inverse
is linear (take for instance the map from `E` to `E/F` where `F` is a closed subspace of `E`
without a closed complement. Then it doesn't have a continuous linear right inverse.) -/
noncomputable irreducible_def nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective (f : E →SL[σ] F)
(hsurj : LinearMap.range f = ⊤) : NonlinearRightInverse f :=
Classical.choose (exists_nonlinearRightInverse_of_surjective f hsurj)
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse_of_surjective ContinuousLinearMap.nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective
theorem nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective_nnnorm_pos (f : E →SL[σ] F)
(hsurj : LinearMap.range f = ⊤) : 0 < (nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective f hsurj).nnnorm := by
rw [nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective]
exact Classical.choose_spec (exists_nonlinearRightInverse_of_surjective f hsurj)
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse_of_surjective_nnnorm_pos ContinuousLinearMap.nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective_nnnorm_pos
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- If a bounded linear map is a bijection, then its inverse is also a bounded linear map. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm (e : E ≃ₛₗ[σ] F) (h : Continuous e) : Continuous e.symm := by
rw [continuous_def]
intro s hs
rw [← e.image_eq_preimage]
rw [← e.coe_coe] at h ⊢
exact ContinuousLinearMap.isOpenMap (σ := σ) ⟨↑e, h⟩ e.surjective s hs
#align linear_equiv.continuous_symm LinearEquiv.continuous_symm
/-- Associating to a linear equivalence between Banach spaces a continuous linear equivalence when
the direct map is continuous, thanks to the Banach open mapping theorem that ensures that the
inverse map is also continuous. -/
def toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous (e : E ≃ₛₗ[σ] F) (h : Continuous e) : E ≃SL[σ] F :=
{ e with
continuous_toFun := h
continuous_invFun := e.continuous_symm h }
#align linear_equiv.to_continuous_linear_equiv_of_continuous LinearEquiv.toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous (e : E ≃ₛₗ[σ] F) (h : Continuous e) :
⇑(e.toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous h) = e :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_fn_to_continuous_linear_equiv_of_continuous LinearEquiv.coeFn_toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous_symm (e : E ≃ₛₗ[σ] F) (h : Continuous e) :
⇑(e.toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous h).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_fn_to_continuous_linear_equiv_of_continuous_symm LinearEquiv.coeFn_toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous_symm
end LinearEquiv
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- An injective continuous linear map with a closed range defines a continuous linear equivalence
between its domain and its range. -/
noncomputable def equivRange (f : E →SL[σ] F) (hinj : Injective f) (hclo : IsClosed (range f)) :
E ≃SL[σ] LinearMap.range f :=
have : CompleteSpace (LinearMap.range f) := hclo.completeSpace_coe
LinearEquiv.toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous (LinearEquiv.ofInjective f.toLinearMap hinj) <|
(f.continuous.codRestrict fun x ↦ LinearMap.mem_range_self f x).congr fun _ ↦ rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearMap_equivRange (f : E →SL[σ] F) (hinj : Injective f) (hclo : IsClosed (range f)) :
f.equivRange hinj hclo = f.rangeRestrict :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivRange (f : E →SL[σ] F) (hinj : Injective f) (hclo : IsClosed (range f)) :
(f.equivRange hinj hclo : E → LinearMap.range f) = f.rangeRestrict :=
rfl
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- Convert a bijective continuous linear map `f : E →SL[σ] F` from a Banach space to a normed space
to a continuous linear equivalence. -/
noncomputable def ofBijective (f : E →SL[σ] F) (hinj : ker f = ⊥) (hsurj : LinearMap.range f = ⊤) :
E ≃SL[σ] F :=
(LinearEquiv.ofBijective ↑f
⟨LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mp hinj,
LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp hsurj⟩).toContinuousLinearEquivOfContinuous
-- Porting note: added `by convert`
(by convert f.continuous)
#align continuous_linear_equiv.of_bijective ContinuousLinearEquiv.ofBijective
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_ofBijective (f : E →SL[σ] F) (hinj : ker f = ⊥) (hsurj : LinearMap.range f = ⊤) :
⇑(ofBijective f hinj hsurj) = f :=
rfl
#align continuous_linear_equiv.coe_fn_of_bijective ContinuousLinearEquiv.coeFn_ofBijective
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Banach.lean | 396 | 399 | theorem coe_ofBijective (f : E →SL[σ] F) (hinj : ker f = ⊥) (hsurj : LinearMap.range f = ⊤) :
↑(ofBijective f hinj hsurj) = f := by |
ext
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Eric Wieser, Jeremy Avigad, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.PosDef
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.schur_complement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a176cb1219e300e85793d44583dede42377b51af"
/-! # 2×2 block matrices and the Schur complement
This file proves properties of 2×2 block matrices `[A B; C D]` that relate to the Schur complement
`D - C*A⁻¹*B`.
Some of the results here generalize to 2×2 matrices in a category, rather than just a ring. A few
results in this direction can be found in the file `CateogryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`,
especially the declarations `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian` and `CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`.
Compare with `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_fromBlocks₁₁`, `Matrix.det_fromBlocks₂₂`: determinant of a block matrix in terms of
the Schur complement.
* `Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq`, `Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq`: the inverse of a
block triangular matrix.
* `Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁`, `Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂`: invertibility of a
block triangular matrix.
* `Matrix.det_one_add_mul_comm`: the **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity**.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.fromBlocks₁₁` and `Matrix.PosSemidef.fromBlocks₂₂`: If a matrix `A` is
positive definite, then `[A B; Bᴴ D]` is postive semidefinite if and only if `D - Bᴴ A⁻¹ B` is
postive semidefinite.
-/
variable {l m n α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open scoped Matrix
section CommRing
variable [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommRing α]
/-- LDU decomposition of a block matrix with an invertible top-left corner, using the
Schur complement. -/
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix l m α)
(D : Matrix l n α) [Invertible A] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 0 (C * ⅟ A) 1 * fromBlocks A 0 0 (D - C * ⅟ A * B) *
fromBlocks 1 (⅟ A * B) 0 1 := by
simp only [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, add_zero, zero_add,
Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_self_assoc,
Matrix.mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel, Matrix.mul_assoc, add_sub_cancel]
#align matrix.from_blocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ Matrix.fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁
/-- LDU decomposition of a block matrix with an invertible bottom-right corner, using the
Schur complement. -/
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix l n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 (B * ⅟ D) 0 1 * fromBlocks (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 0 D *
fromBlocks 1 0 (⅟ D * C) 1 :=
(Matrix.reindex (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)).injective <| by
simpa [reindex_apply, Equiv.sumComm_symm, ← submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n m), ←
submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n l), Equiv.sumComm_apply,
fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap] using fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ D C B A
#align matrix.from_blocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ Matrix.fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂
section Triangular
/-! #### Block triangular matrices -/
/-- An upper-block-triangular matrix is invertible if its diagonal is. -/
def fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] : Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D) :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (fromBlocks (⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D)) <| by
simp_rw [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, add_zero,
Matrix.neg_mul, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel, add_right_neg,
fromBlocks_one]
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₂₁_invertible Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible
/-- A lower-block-triangular matrix is invertible if its diagonal is. -/
def fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] : Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D) :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _
(fromBlocks (⅟ A) 0 (-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ A))
(⅟ D)) <| by -- a symmetry argument is more work than just copying the proof
simp_rw [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, add_zero,
Matrix.neg_mul, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel, add_left_neg,
fromBlocks_one]
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₁₂_invertible Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible
theorem invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D) = fromBlocks (⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks_zero₂₁_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq
theorem invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D) = fromBlocks (⅟ A) 0 (-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks_zero₁₂_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq
/-- Both diagonal entries of an invertible upper-block-triangular matrix are invertible (by reading
off the diagonal entries of the inverse). -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D)] : Invertible A × Invertible D where
fst :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)).toBlocks₁₁ <| by
have := invOf_mul_self (fromBlocks A B 0 D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₁₁ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁, Matrix.mul_zero, add_zero, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
snd :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)).toBlocks₂₂ <| by
have := mul_invOf_self (fromBlocks A B 0 D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₂₂ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks_zero₂₁_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible
/-- Both diagonal entries of an invertible lower-block-triangular matrix are invertible (by reading
off the diagonal entries of the inverse). -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D)] : Invertible A × Invertible D where
fst :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)).toBlocks₁₁ <| by
have := mul_invOf_self (fromBlocks A 0 C D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₁₁ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁, Matrix.zero_mul, add_zero, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
snd :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)).toBlocks₂₂ <| by
have := invOf_mul_self (fromBlocks A 0 C D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₂₂ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂, Matrix.mul_zero, zero_add, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks_zero₁₂_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible
/-- `invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible` form
an equivalence. -/
def fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D) ≃ Invertible A × Invertible D where
toFun _ := invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
invFun i := by
letI := i.1
letI := i.2
exact fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₂₁_invertible_equiv Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv
/-- `invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible` form
an equivalence. -/
def fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D) ≃ Invertible A × Invertible D where
toFun _ := invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
invFun i := by
letI := i.1
letI := i.2
exact fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₁₂_invertible_equiv Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv
/-- An upper block-triangular matrix is invertible iff both elements of its diagonal are.
This is a propositional form of `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α} {D : Matrix n n α} :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B 0 D) ↔ IsUnit A ∧ IsUnit D := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, ← nonempty_prod,
(fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv _ _ _).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_zero₂₁ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁
/-- A lower block-triangular matrix is invertible iff both elements of its diagonal are.
This is a propositional form of `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂ {A : Matrix m m α} {C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A 0 C D) ↔ IsUnit A ∧ IsUnit D := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, ← nonempty_prod,
(fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv _ _ _).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_zero₁₂ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂
/-- An expression for the inverse of an upper block-triangular matrix, when either both elements of
diagonal are invertible, or both are not. -/
theorem inv_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_of_isUnit_iff (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
(hAD : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit D) :
(fromBlocks A B 0 D)⁻¹ = fromBlocks A⁻¹ (-(A⁻¹ * B * D⁻¹)) 0 D⁻¹ := by
by_cases hA : IsUnit A
· have hD := hAD.mp hA
cases hA.nonempty_invertible
cases hD.nonempty_invertible
letI := fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
simp_rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq]
· have hD := hAD.not.mp hA
have : ¬IsUnit (fromBlocks A B 0 D) :=
isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁.not.mpr (not_and'.mpr fun _ => hA)
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hA, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hD,
Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this, Matrix.zero_mul, neg_zero, fromBlocks_zero]
#align matrix.inv_from_blocks_zero₂₁_of_is_unit_iff Matrix.inv_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_of_isUnit_iff
/-- An expression for the inverse of a lower block-triangular matrix, when either both elements of
diagonal are invertible, or both are not. -/
theorem inv_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_of_isUnit_iff (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
(hAD : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit D) :
(fromBlocks A 0 C D)⁻¹ = fromBlocks A⁻¹ 0 (-(D⁻¹ * C * A⁻¹)) D⁻¹ := by
by_cases hA : IsUnit A
· have hD := hAD.mp hA
cases hA.nonempty_invertible
cases hD.nonempty_invertible
letI := fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
simp_rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq]
· have hD := hAD.not.mp hA
have : ¬IsUnit (fromBlocks A 0 C D) :=
isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂.not.mpr (not_and'.mpr fun _ => hA)
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hA, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hD,
Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this, Matrix.zero_mul, neg_zero, fromBlocks_zero]
#align matrix.inv_from_blocks_zero₁₂_of_is_unit_iff Matrix.inv_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_of_isUnit_iff
end Triangular
/-! ### 2×2 block matrices -/
section Block
/-! #### General 2×2 block matrices-/
/-- A block matrix is invertible if the bottom right corner and the corresponding schur complement
is. -/
def fromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C)] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) := by
-- factor `fromBlocks` via `fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂`, and state the inverse we expect
convert Invertible.copy' _ _ (fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C))) (⅟ D + ⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ _ _ _ _) _
· -- the product is invertible because all the factors are
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
refine Invertible.mul ?_ (fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible _ _ _)
exact
Invertible.mul (fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _)
(fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _)
· -- unfold the `Invertible` instances to get the raw factors
show
_ =
fromBlocks 1 0 (-(1 * (⅟ D * C) * 1)) 1 *
(fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * 0 * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D) *
fromBlocks 1 (-(1 * (B * ⅟ D) * 1)) 0 1)
-- combine into a single block matrix
simp only [fromBlocks_multiply, invOf_one, Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one, Matrix.zero_mul,
Matrix.mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, neg_zero, Matrix.mul_neg, Matrix.neg_mul, neg_neg, ←
Matrix.mul_assoc, add_comm (⅟D)]
#align matrix.from_blocks₂₂_invertible Matrix.fromBlocks₂₂Invertible
/-- A block matrix is invertible if the top left corner and the corresponding schur complement
is. -/
def fromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B)] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) := by
-- we argue by symmetry
letI := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible D C B A
letI iDCBA :=
submatrixEquivInvertible (fromBlocks D C B A) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)
exact
iDCBA.copy' _
(fromBlocks (⅟ A + ⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(-(⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
(fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
#align matrix.from_blocks₁₁_invertible Matrix.fromBlocks₁₁Invertible
theorem invOf_fromBlocks₂₂_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C)]
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) =
fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C))) (⅟ D + ⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible A B C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks₂₂_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks₂₂_eq
theorem invOf_fromBlocks₁₁_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B)]
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) =
fromBlocks (⅟ A + ⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(-(⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)) := by
letI := fromBlocks₁₁Invertible A B C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks₁₁_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks₁₁_eq
/-- If a block matrix is invertible and so is its bottom left element, then so is the corresponding
Schur complement. -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
suffices Invertible (fromBlocks (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 0 D) by
exact (invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 D).1
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
letI iDC : Invertible (fromBlocks 1 0 (⅟ D * C) 1 : Matrix (Sum m n) (Sum m n) α) :=
fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible _ _ _
letI iBD : Invertible (fromBlocks 1 (B * ⅟ D) 0 1 : Matrix (Sum m n) (Sum m n) α) :=
fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _
letI iBDC := Invertible.copy ‹_› _ (fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ A B C D).symm
refine (iBD.mulLeft _).symm ?_
exact (iDC.mulRight _).symm iBDC
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks₂₂_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible
/-- If a block matrix is invertible and so is its bottom left element, then so is the corresponding
Schur complement. -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
-- another symmetry argument
letI iABCD' :=
submatrixEquivInvertible (fromBlocks A B C D) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)
letI iDCBA := iABCD'.copy _ (fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
exact invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible D C B A
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks₁₁_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible
/-- `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocks₂₂Invertible` as an
equivalence. -/
def invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) ≃ Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) where
toFun _iABCD := invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible _ _ _ _
invFun _i_schur := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible _ _ _ _
left_inv _iABCD := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _i_schur := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.invertible_equiv_from_blocks₂₂_invertible Matrix.invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible
/-- `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocks₁₁Invertible` as an
equivalence. -/
def invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) ≃ Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B) where
toFun _iABCD := invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible _ _ _ _
invFun _i_schur := fromBlocks₁₁Invertible _ _ _ _
left_inv _iABCD := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _i_schur := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.invertible_equiv_from_blocks₁₁_invertible Matrix.invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible
/-- If the bottom-left element of a block matrix is invertible, then the whole matrix is invertible
iff the corresponding schur complement is. -/
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₂₂ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α}
{C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} [Invertible D] :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B C D) ↔ IsUnit (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible A B C D).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_iff_of_invertible₂₂ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₂₂
/-- If the top-right element of a block matrix is invertible, then the whole matrix is invertible
iff the corresponding schur complement is. -/
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₁₁ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α}
{C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A] :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B C D) ↔ IsUnit (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible A B C D).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_iff_of_invertible₁₁ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₁₁
end Block
/-! ### Lemmas about `Matrix.det` -/
section Det
/-- Determinant of a 2×2 block matrix, expanded around an invertible top left element in terms of
the Schur complement. -/
theorem det_fromBlocks₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det A * det (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
rw [fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A := A), det_mul, det_mul, det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁,
det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁, det_fromBlocks_zero₁₂, det_one, det_one, one_mul, one_mul, mul_one]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks₁₁ Matrix.det_fromBlocks₁₁
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_one₁₁ (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks 1 B C D).det = det (D - C * B) := by
haveI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
rw [det_fromBlocks₁₁, invOf_one, Matrix.mul_one, det_one, one_mul]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks_one₁₁ Matrix.det_fromBlocks_one₁₁
/-- Determinant of a 2×2 block matrix, expanded around an invertible bottom right element in terms
of the Schur complement. -/
theorem det_fromBlocks₂₂ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det D * det (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
have : fromBlocks A B C D =
(fromBlocks D C B A).submatrix (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) := by
ext (i j)
cases i <;> cases j <;> rfl
rw [this, det_submatrix_equiv_self, det_fromBlocks₁₁]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks₂₂ Matrix.det_fromBlocks₂₂
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_one₂₂ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C 1).det = det (A - B * C) := by
haveI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
rw [det_fromBlocks₂₂, invOf_one, Matrix.mul_one, det_one, one_mul]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks_one₂₂ Matrix.det_fromBlocks_one₂₂
/-- The **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity**. Note the `1` on the LHS is of shape m×m, while the `1` on
the RHS is of shape n×n. -/
theorem det_one_add_mul_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (1 + A * B) = det (1 + B * A) :=
calc
det (1 + A * B) = det (fromBlocks 1 (-A) B 1) := by
rw [det_fromBlocks_one₂₂, Matrix.neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add]
_ = det (1 + B * A) := by rw [det_fromBlocks_one₁₁, Matrix.mul_neg, sub_neg_eq_add]
#align matrix.det_one_add_mul_comm Matrix.det_one_add_mul_comm
/-- Alternate statement of the **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity** -/
theorem det_mul_add_one_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (A * B + 1) = det (B * A + 1) := by rw [add_comm, det_one_add_mul_comm, add_comm]
#align matrix.det_mul_add_one_comm Matrix.det_mul_add_one_comm
theorem det_one_sub_mul_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (1 - A * B) = det (1 - B * A) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← Matrix.neg_mul, det_one_add_mul_comm, Matrix.mul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align matrix.det_one_sub_mul_comm Matrix.det_one_sub_mul_comm
/-- A special case of the **Matrix determinant lemma** for when `A = I`. -/
theorem det_one_add_col_mul_row (u v : m → α) : det (1 + col u * row v) = 1 + v ⬝ᵥ u := by
rw [det_one_add_mul_comm, det_unique, Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, Matrix.one_apply_eq,
Matrix.row_mul_col_apply]
#align matrix.det_one_add_col_mul_row Matrix.det_one_add_col_mul_row
/-- The **Matrix determinant lemma**
TODO: show the more general version without `hA : IsUnit A.det` as
`(A + col u * row v).det = A.det + v ⬝ᵥ (adjugate A) *ᵥ u`.
-/
theorem det_add_col_mul_row {A : Matrix m m α} (hA : IsUnit A.det) (u v : m → α) :
(A + col u * row v).det = A.det * (1 + row v * A⁻¹ * col u).det := by
nth_rewrite 1 [← Matrix.mul_one A]
rwa [← Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A (col u * row v),
← Matrix.mul_add, det_mul, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_one_add_mul_comm,
← Matrix.mul_assoc]
/-- A generalization of the **Matrix determinant lemma** -/
theorem det_add_mul {A : Matrix m m α} (U : Matrix m n α)
(V : Matrix n m α) (hA : IsUnit A.det) :
(A + U * V).det = A.det * (1 + V * A⁻¹ * U).det := by
nth_rewrite 1 [← Matrix.mul_one A]
rwa [← Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A (U * V), ← Matrix.mul_add,
det_mul, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_one_add_mul_comm, ← Matrix.mul_assoc]
end Det
end CommRing
/-! ### Lemmas about `ℝ` and `ℂ` and other `StarOrderedRing`s -/
section StarOrderedRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [CommRing 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [StarRing 𝕜] [StarOrderedRing 𝕜]
scoped infixl:65 " ⊕ᵥ " => Sum.elim
theorem schur_complement_eq₁₁ [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m m 𝕜}
(B : Matrix m n 𝕜) (D : Matrix n n 𝕜) (x : m → 𝕜) (y : n → 𝕜) [Invertible A]
(hA : A.IsHermitian) :
(star (x ⊕ᵥ y)) ᵥ* (fromBlocks A B Bᴴ D) ⬝ᵥ (x ⊕ᵥ y) =
(star (x + (A⁻¹ * B) *ᵥ y)) ᵥ* A ⬝ᵥ (x + (A⁻¹ * B) *ᵥ y) +
(star y) ᵥ* (D - Bᴴ * A⁻¹ * B) ⬝ᵥ y := by
simp [Function.star_sum_elim, fromBlocks_mulVec, vecMul_fromBlocks, add_vecMul,
dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_sub, Matrix.mul_assoc, vecMul_mulVec, hA.eq,
conjTranspose_nonsing_inv, star_mulVec]
abel
#align matrix.schur_complement_eq₁₁ Matrix.schur_complement_eq₁₁
theorem schur_complement_eq₂₂ [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix m m 𝕜)
(B : Matrix m n 𝕜) {D : Matrix n n 𝕜} (x : m → 𝕜) (y : n → 𝕜) [Invertible D]
(hD : D.IsHermitian) :
(star (x ⊕ᵥ y)) ᵥ* (fromBlocks A B Bᴴ D) ⬝ᵥ (x ⊕ᵥ y) =
(star ((D⁻¹ * Bᴴ) *ᵥ x + y)) ᵥ* D ⬝ᵥ ((D⁻¹ * Bᴴ) *ᵥ x + y) +
(star x) ᵥ* (A - B * D⁻¹ * Bᴴ) ⬝ᵥ x := by
simp [Function.star_sum_elim, fromBlocks_mulVec, vecMul_fromBlocks, add_vecMul,
dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_sub, Matrix.mul_assoc, vecMul_mulVec, hD.eq,
conjTranspose_nonsing_inv, star_mulVec]
abel
#align matrix.schur_complement_eq₂₂ Matrix.schur_complement_eq₂₂
theorem IsHermitian.fromBlocks₁₁ [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {A : Matrix m m 𝕜} (B : Matrix m n 𝕜)
(D : Matrix n n 𝕜) (hA : A.IsHermitian) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B Bᴴ D).IsHermitian ↔ (D - Bᴴ * A⁻¹ * B).IsHermitian := by
have hBAB : (Bᴴ * A⁻¹ * B).IsHermitian := by
apply isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul
apply hA.inv
rw [isHermitian_fromBlocks_iff]
constructor
· intro h
apply IsHermitian.sub h.2.2.2 hBAB
· intro h
refine ⟨hA, rfl, conjTranspose_conjTranspose B, ?_⟩
rw [← sub_add_cancel D]
apply IsHermitian.add h hBAB
#align matrix.is_hermitian.from_blocks₁₁ Matrix.IsHermitian.fromBlocks₁₁
theorem IsHermitian.fromBlocks₂₂ [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix m m 𝕜) (B : Matrix m n 𝕜)
{D : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hD : D.IsHermitian) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B Bᴴ D).IsHermitian ↔ (A - B * D⁻¹ * Bᴴ).IsHermitian := by
rw [← isHermitian_submatrix_equiv (Equiv.sumComm n m), Equiv.sumComm_apply,
fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap]
convert IsHermitian.fromBlocks₁₁ _ _ hD <;> simp
#align matrix.is_hermitian.from_blocks₂₂ Matrix.IsHermitian.fromBlocks₂₂
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SchurComplement.lean | 530 | 546 | theorem PosSemidef.fromBlocks₁₁ [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m m 𝕜}
(B : Matrix m n 𝕜) (D : Matrix n n 𝕜) (hA : A.PosDef) [Invertible A] :
(fromBlocks A B Bᴴ D).PosSemidef ↔ (D - Bᴴ * A⁻¹ * B).PosSemidef := by |
rw [PosSemidef, IsHermitian.fromBlocks₁₁ _ _ hA.1]
constructor
· refine fun h => ⟨h.1, fun x => ?_⟩
have := h.2 (-((A⁻¹ * B) *ᵥ x) ⊕ᵥ x)
rw [dotProduct_mulVec, schur_complement_eq₁₁ B D _ _ hA.1, neg_add_self, dotProduct_zero,
zero_add] at this
rw [dotProduct_mulVec]; exact this
· refine fun h => ⟨h.1, fun x => ?_⟩
rw [dotProduct_mulVec, ← Sum.elim_comp_inl_inr x, schur_complement_eq₁₁ B D _ _ hA.1]
apply le_add_of_nonneg_of_le
· rw [← dotProduct_mulVec]
apply hA.posSemidef.2
· rw [← dotProduct_mulVec (star (x ∘ Sum.inr))]
apply h.2
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
#align_import group_theory.specific_groups.cyclic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0f6670b8af2dff699de1c0b4b49039b31bc13c46"
/-!
# Cyclic groups
A group `G` is called cyclic if there exists an element `g : G` such that every element of `G` is of
the form `g ^ n` for some `n : ℕ`. This file only deals with the predicate on a group to be cyclic.
For the concrete cyclic group of order `n`, see `Data.ZMod.Basic`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclic` is a predicate on a group stating that the group is cyclic.
## Main statements
* `isCyclic_of_prime_card` proves that a finite group of prime order is cyclic.
* `isSimpleGroup_of_prime_card`, `IsSimpleGroup.isCyclic`,
and `IsSimpleGroup.prime_card` classify finite simple abelian groups.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_card`: For a finite cyclic group `G`, the exponent is equal to
the group's cardinality.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_zero_of_infinite`: Infinite cyclic groups have exponent zero.
* `IsCyclic.iff_exponent_eq_card`: A finite commutative group is cyclic iff its exponent
is equal to its cardinality.
## Tags
cyclic group
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {a : α}
section Cyclic
attribute [local instance] setFintype
open Subgroup
/-- A group is called *cyclic* if it is generated by a single element. -/
class IsAddCyclic (α : Type u) [AddGroup α] : Prop where
exists_generator : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples g
#align is_add_cyclic IsAddCyclic
/-- A group is called *cyclic* if it is generated by a single element. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsCyclic (α : Type u) [Group α] : Prop where
exists_generator : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g
#align is_cyclic IsCyclic
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) isCyclic_of_subsingleton [Group α] [Subsingleton α] : IsCyclic α :=
⟨⟨1, fun x => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
exact mem_zpowers 1⟩⟩
#align is_cyclic_of_subsingleton isCyclic_of_subsingleton
#align is_add_cyclic_of_subsingleton isAddCyclic_of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem isCyclic_multiplicative_iff [AddGroup α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) ↔ IsAddCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isCyclic_multiplicative [AddGroup α] [IsAddCyclic α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) :=
isCyclic_multiplicative_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem isAddCyclic_additive_iff [Group α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) ↔ IsCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isAddCyclic_additive [Group α] [IsCyclic α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) :=
isAddCyclic_additive_iff.mpr inferInstance
/-- A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have a better
proof of `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have
a better proof of `AddCommGroup`."]
def IsCyclic.commGroup [hg : Group α] [IsCyclic α] : CommGroup α :=
{ hg with
mul_comm := fun x y =>
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := hg x
let ⟨_, hm⟩ := hg y
hm ▸ hn ▸ zpow_mul_comm _ _ _ }
#align is_cyclic.comm_group IsCyclic.commGroup
#align is_add_cyclic.add_comm_group IsAddCyclic.addCommGroup
variable [Group α]
/-- A non-cyclic multiplicative group is non-trivial. -/
@[to_additive "A non-cyclic additive group is non-trivial."]
theorem Nontrivial.of_not_isCyclic (nc : ¬IsCyclic α) : Nontrivial α := by
contrapose! nc
exact @isCyclic_of_subsingleton _ _ (not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp nc)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_cyclic {G : Type*} [Group G] [h : IsCyclic G] (σ : G →* G) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ g : G, σ g = g ^ m := by
obtain ⟨h, hG⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hG (σ h)
refine ⟨m, fun g => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hG g
rw [MonoidHom.map_zpow, ← hm, ← zpow_mul, ← zpow_mul']
#align monoid_hom.map_cyclic MonoidHom.map_cyclic
#align monoid_add_hom.map_add_cyclic AddMonoidHom.map_addCyclic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias
MonoidAddHom.map_add_cyclic := AddMonoidHom.map_addCyclic
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card [Fintype α] (x : α) (hx : orderOf x = Fintype.card α) :
IsCyclic α := by
classical
use x
simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
rw [← Fintype.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α), ← Fintype.card_zpowers] at hx
exact Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_univ _) (ge_of_eq hx)
#align is_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card
#align is_add_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card isAddCyclic_of_addOrderOf_eq_card
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias isAddCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card := isAddCyclic_of_addOrderOf_eq_card
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G}
(H : Subgroup G) [hp : Fact (Fintype.card G).Prime] : H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤ := by
classical
have := card_subgroup_dvd_card H
rwa [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card (α := G), Nat.dvd_prime hp.1, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
← eq_bot_iff_card, card_eq_iff_eq_top] at this
/-- Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group. -/
@[to_additive "Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group."]
theorem zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Fintype.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : zpowers g = ⊤ := by
subst h
have := (zpowers g).eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card
rwa [zpowers_eq_bot, or_iff_right hg] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_zpowers_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ zpowers g := by
simp_rw [zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card h hg, Subgroup.mem_top]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ Submonoid.powers g := by
rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg
@[to_additive]
theorem powers_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Fintype.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : Submonoid.powers g = ⊤ := by
ext x
simp [mem_powers_of_prime_card h hg]
/-- A finite group of prime order is cyclic. -/
@[to_additive "A finite group of prime order is cyclic."]
theorem isCyclic_of_prime_card {α : Type u} [Group α] [Fintype α] {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card α = p) : IsCyclic α := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g ≠ 1 := Fintype.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (h.symm ▸ hp.1.one_lt) 1
exact ⟨g, fun g' ↦ mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg⟩
#align is_cyclic_of_prime_card isCyclic_of_prime_card
#align is_add_cyclic_of_prime_card isAddCyclic_of_prime_card
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_surjective {H G F : Type*} [Group H] [Group G] [hH : IsCyclic H]
[FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G] (f : F) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
IsCyclic G := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hH
refine ⟨f x, fun a ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hf a
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hx a
exact ⟨n, (map_zpow _ _ _).symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers [Fintype α] {g : α} (hx : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) :
orderOf g = Fintype.card α := by
classical
rw [← Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply Fintype.card_of_finset'
simpa using hx
#align order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers
#align add_order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zmultiples addOrderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zmultiples
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_generator_eq_natCard (h : ∀ x, x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers a) : orderOf a = Nat.card α :=
Nat.card_zpowers a ▸ (Nat.card_congr <| Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv h)
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] [G_cyclic : IsCyclic G]
{k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Fintype.card G) : ∃ a : G, a ^ k ≠ 1 := by
rcases G_cyclic with ⟨a, ha⟩
use a
contrapose! k_lt_card_G
convert orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt k_lt_card_G
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Nat.card_zpowers, eq_comm, card_eq_iff_eq_top, eq_top_iff]
exact fun x _ ↦ ha x
@[to_additive]
theorem Infinite.orderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers [Infinite α] {g : α}
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) : orderOf g = 0 := by
classical
rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff']
refine fun n hn hgn => ?_
have ho := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, hn, hgn⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Infinite.exists_not_mem_finset
(Finset.image (fun x => g ^ x) <| Finset.range <| orderOf g)
apply hx
rw [← ho.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf, Submonoid.mem_powers_iff]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h x
dsimp at hk
obtain ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩ := k.eq_nat_or_neg
· exact ⟨k, mod_cast hk⟩
rw [← zpow_mod_orderOf] at hk
have : 0 ≤ (-k % orderOf g : ℤ) := Int.emod_nonneg (-k) (mod_cast ho.orderOf_pos.ne')
refine ⟨(-k % orderOf g : ℤ).toNat, ?_⟩
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this]
#align infinite.order_of_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers Infinite.orderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers
#align infinite.add_order_of_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zmultiples Infinite.addOrderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zmultiples
@[to_additive]
instance Bot.isCyclic {α : Type u} [Group α] : IsCyclic (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
⟨⟨1, fun x => ⟨0, Subtype.eq <| (zpow_zero (1 : α)).trans <| Eq.symm (Subgroup.mem_bot.1 x.2)⟩⟩⟩
#align bot.is_cyclic Bot.isCyclic
#align bot.is_add_cyclic Bot.isAddCyclic
@[to_additive]
instance Subgroup.isCyclic {α : Type u} [Group α] [IsCyclic α] (H : Subgroup α) : IsCyclic H :=
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
if hx : ∃ x : α, x ∈ H ∧ x ≠ (1 : α) then
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := hx
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hex : ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ g ^ n ∈ H :=
⟨k.natAbs,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun h => hx₂ <| by
rw [← hk, Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h, zpow_zero], by
cases' k with k k
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natAbs_cast k, ← zpow_natCast, ← Int.ofNat_eq_coe, hk]
exact hx₁
· rw [Int.natAbs_negSucc, ← Subgroup.inv_mem_iff H]; simp_all⟩
⟨⟨⟨g ^ Nat.find hex, (Nat.find_spec hex).2⟩, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hk₂ : g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) ∈ H := by
rw [zpow_mul]
apply H.zpow_mem
exact mod_cast (Nat.find_spec hex).2
have hk₃ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex : ℤ) ∈ H :=
(Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right H hk₂).1 <| by
rw [← zpow_add, Int.emod_add_ediv, hk]; exact hx
have hk₄ : k % Nat.find hex = (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs := by
rw [Int.natAbs_of_nonneg
(Int.emod_nonneg _ (Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))]
have hk₅ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs ∈ H := by rwa [← zpow_natCast, ← hk₄]
have hk₆ : (k % (Nat.find hex : ℤ)).natAbs = 0 :=
by_contradiction fun h =>
Nat.find_min hex
(Int.ofNat_lt.1 <| by
rw [← hk₄]; exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))
⟨Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h, hk₅⟩
⟨k / (Nat.find hex : ℤ),
Subtype.ext_iff_val.2
(by
suffices g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) = x by simpa [zpow_mul]
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel'
(Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero (Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp hk₆)),
hk])⟩⟩⟩
else by
have : H = (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
Subgroup.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => by simp at *; tauto, fun h => by rw [Subgroup.mem_bot.1 h]; exact H.one_mem⟩
subst this; infer_instance
#align subgroup.is_cyclic Subgroup.isCyclic
#align add_subgroup.is_add_cyclic AddSubgroup.isAddCyclic
open Finset Nat
section Classical
open scoped Classical
@[to_additive IsAddCyclic.card_nsmul_eq_zero_le]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SpecificGroups/Cyclic.lean | 298 | 329 | theorem IsCyclic.card_pow_eq_one_le [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] [IsCyclic α] {n : ℕ} (hn0 : 0 < n) :
(univ.filter fun a : α => a ^ n = 1).card ≤ n :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
calc
(univ.filter fun a : α => a ^ n = 1).card ≤
(zpowers (g ^ (Fintype.card α / Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α))) : Set α).toFinset.card :=
card_le_card fun x hx =>
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := show x ∈ Submonoid.powers g from mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.2 <| hg x
Set.mem_toFinset.2
⟨(m / (Fintype.card α / Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α)) : ℕ), by
dsimp at hm
have hgmn : g ^ (m * Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α)) = 1 := by |
rw [pow_mul, hm, ← pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff]; exact (mem_filter.1 hx).2
dsimp only
rw [zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left', hm]
refine Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (gcd_pos_of_pos_left (Fintype.card α) hn0) ?_
conv_lhs =>
rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), ←
orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg]
exact orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hgmn⟩
_ ≤ n := by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := Nat.gcd_dvd_right n (Fintype.card α)
have hm0 : 0 < m :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun hm0 => by
rw [hm0, mul_zero, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hm
exact hm.elim' 1
simp only [Set.toFinset_card, SetLike.coe_sort_coe]
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers, orderOf_pow g, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg]
nth_rw 2 [hm]; nth_rw 3 [hm]
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ hn0), gcd_mul_left_left, hm,
Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hm0]
exact le_of_dvd hn0 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
#align_import data.finset.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Lattice operations on finsets
-/
-- TODO:
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function Multiset OrderDual
variable {F α β γ ι κ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### sup -/
section Sup
-- TODO: define with just `[Bot α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[OrderBot α]`
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α]
/-- Supremum of a finite set: `sup {a, b, c} f = f a ⊔ f b ⊔ f c` -/
def sup (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ f
#align finset.sup Finset.sup
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f g : β → α} {a : α}
theorem sup_def : s.sup f = (s.1.map f).sup :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_def Finset.sup_def
@[simp]
theorem sup_empty : (∅ : Finset β).sup f = ⊥ :=
fold_empty
#align finset.sup_empty Finset.sup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_cons {b : β} (h : b ∉ s) : (cons b s h).sup f = f b ⊔ s.sup f :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.sup_cons Finset.sup_cons
@[simp]
theorem sup_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} : (insert b s : Finset β).sup f = f b ⊔ s.sup f :=
fold_insert_idem
#align finset.sup_insert Finset.sup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sup_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (f : γ → β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image f).sup g = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
fold_image_idem
#align finset.sup_image Finset.sup_image
@[simp]
theorem sup_map (s : Finset γ) (f : γ ↪ β) (g : β → α) : (s.map f).sup g = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
fold_map
#align finset.sup_map Finset.sup_map
@[simp]
theorem sup_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).sup f = f b :=
Multiset.sup_singleton
#align finset.sup_singleton Finset.sup_singleton
theorem sup_sup : s.sup (f ⊔ g) = s.sup f ⊔ s.sup g := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, sup_empty, sup_empty, bot_sup_eq]
| cons _ _ _ ih =>
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, sup_cons, ih]
exact sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.sup_sup Finset.sup_sup
theorem sup_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.sup f = s₂.sup g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
#align finset.sup_congr Finset.sup_congr
@[simp]
theorem _root_.map_finset_sup [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β]
[FunLike F α β] [SupBotHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α) : f (s.sup g) = s.sup (f ∘ g) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (map_bot f) fun i s _ h => by
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, map_sup, h, Function.comp_apply]
#align map_finset_sup map_finset_sup
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_le_iff {a : α} : s.sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.sup_le
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb => k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h => h ▸ k _ hb⟩
#align finset.sup_le_iff Finset.sup_le_iff
protected alias ⟨_, sup_le⟩ := Finset.sup_le_iff
#align finset.sup_le Finset.sup_le
theorem sup_const_le : (s.sup fun _ => a) ≤ a :=
Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
#align finset.sup_const_le Finset.sup_const_le
theorem le_sup {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ≤ s.sup f :=
Finset.sup_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ hb
#align finset.le_sup Finset.le_sup
theorem le_sup_of_le {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ f b) : a ≤ s.sup f := h.trans <| le_sup hb
#align finset.le_sup_of_le Finset.le_sup_of_le
theorem sup_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).sup f = s₁.sup f ⊔ s₂.sup f :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.sup_union Finset.sup_union
@[simp]
theorem sup_biUnion [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).sup f = s.sup fun x => (t x).sup f :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [@forall_swap _ β]
#align finset.sup_bUnion Finset.sup_biUnion
theorem sup_const {s : Finset β} (h : s.Nonempty) (c : α) : (s.sup fun _ => c) = c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff (fun _ => Finset.sup_le_iff.trans h.forall_const)
#align finset.sup_const Finset.sup_const
@[simp]
theorem sup_bot (s : Finset β) : (s.sup fun _ => ⊥) = (⊥ : α) := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact sup_empty
· exact sup_const hs _
#align finset.sup_bot Finset.sup_bot
theorem sup_ite (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.sup fun i => ite (p i) (f i) (g i)) = (s.filter p).sup f ⊔ (s.filter fun i => ¬p i).sup g :=
fold_ite _
#align finset.sup_ite Finset.sup_ite
theorem sup_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ g b) : s.sup f ≤ s.sup g :=
Finset.sup_le fun b hb => le_trans (h b hb) (le_sup hb)
#align finset.sup_mono_fun Finset.sup_mono_fun
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.sup f ≤ s₂.sup f :=
Finset.sup_le (fun _ hb => le_sup (h hb))
#align finset.sup_mono Finset.sup_mono
protected theorem sup_comm (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β → γ → α) :
(s.sup fun b => t.sup (f b)) = t.sup fun c => s.sup fun b => f b c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simpa using forall₂_swap
#align finset.sup_comm Finset.sup_comm
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS does not simplify
theorem sup_attach (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : (s.attach.sup fun x => f x) = s.sup f :=
(s.attach.sup_map (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f).symm.trans <| congr_arg _ attach_map_val
#align finset.sup_attach Finset.sup_attach
/-- See also `Finset.product_biUnion`. -/
theorem sup_product_left (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup f = s.sup fun i => t.sup fun i' => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simp [@forall_swap _ γ]
#align finset.sup_product_left Finset.sup_product_left
theorem sup_product_right (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup f = t.sup fun i' => s.sup fun i => f ⟨i, i'⟩ := by
rw [sup_product_left, Finset.sup_comm]
#align finset.sup_product_right Finset.sup_product_right
section Prod
variable {ι κ α β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β]
{s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ}
@[simp] lemma sup_prodMap (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
sup (s ×ˢ t) (Prod.map f g) = (sup s f, sup t g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun i ↦ by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
simp only [Prod.map, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_product, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.le_def]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i hi ↦ (h _ _ hi hb).1, fun j hj ↦ (h _ _ ha hj).2⟩, by aesop⟩
end Prod
@[simp]
theorem sup_erase_bot [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : (s.erase ⊥).sup id = s.sup id := by
refine (sup_mono (s.erase_subset _)).antisymm (Finset.sup_le_iff.2 fun a ha => ?_)
obtain rfl | ha' := eq_or_ne a ⊥
· exact bot_le
· exact le_sup (mem_erase.2 ⟨ha', ha⟩)
#align finset.sup_erase_bot Finset.sup_erase_bot
theorem sup_sdiff_right {α β : Type*} [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → α)
(a : α) : (s.sup fun b => f b \ a) = s.sup f \ a := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, sup_empty, bot_sdiff]
| cons _ _ _ h => rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, h, sup_sdiff]
#align finset.sup_sdiff_right Finset.sup_sdiff_right
theorem comp_sup_eq_sup_comp [SemilatticeSup γ] [OrderBot γ] {s : Finset β} {f : β → α} (g : α → γ)
(g_sup : ∀ x y, g (x ⊔ y) = g x ⊔ g y) (bot : g ⊥ = ⊥) : g (s.sup f) = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s bot fun c t hc ih => by
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, g_sup, ih, Function.comp_apply]
#align finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp
/-- Computing `sup` in a subtype (closed under `sup`) is the same as computing it in `α`. -/
theorem sup_coe {P : α → Prop} {Pbot : P ⊥} {Psup : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)} (t : Finset β)
(f : β → { x : α // P x }) :
(@sup { x // P x } _ (Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup) (Subtype.orderBot Pbot) t f : α) =
t.sup fun x => ↑(f x) := by
letI := Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup
letI := Subtype.orderBot Pbot
apply comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Subtype.val <;> intros <;> rfl
#align finset.sup_coe Finset.sup_coe
@[simp]
theorem sup_toFinset {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → Multiset β) :
(s.sup f).toFinset = s.sup fun x => (f x).toFinset :=
comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Multiset.toFinset toFinset_union rfl
#align finset.sup_to_finset Finset.sup_toFinset
theorem _root_.List.foldr_sup_eq_sup_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ = l.toFinset.sup id := by
rw [← coe_fold_r, ← Multiset.fold_dedup_idem, sup_def, ← List.toFinset_coe, toFinset_val,
Multiset.map_id]
rfl
#align list.foldr_sup_eq_sup_to_finset List.foldr_sup_eq_sup_toFinset
theorem subset_range_sup_succ (s : Finset ℕ) : s ⊆ range (s.sup id).succ := fun _ hn =>
mem_range.2 <| Nat.lt_succ_of_le <| @le_sup _ _ _ _ _ id _ hn
#align finset.subset_range_sup_succ Finset.subset_range_sup_succ
theorem exists_nat_subset_range (s : Finset ℕ) : ∃ n : ℕ, s ⊆ range n :=
⟨_, s.subset_range_sup_succ⟩
#align finset.exists_nat_subset_range Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
theorem sup_induction {p : α → Prop} (hb : p ⊥) (hp : ∀ a₁, p a₁ → ∀ a₂, p a₂ → p (a₁ ⊔ a₂))
(hs : ∀ b ∈ s, p (f b)) : p (s.sup f) := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact hb
| cons _ _ _ ih =>
simp only [sup_cons, forall_mem_cons] at hs ⊢
exact hp _ hs.1 _ (ih hs.2)
#align finset.sup_induction Finset.sup_induction
theorem sup_le_of_le_directed {α : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] (s : Set α)
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) (t : Finset α) :
(∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) → ∃ x ∈ s, t.sup id ≤ x := by
classical
induction' t using Finset.induction_on with a r _ ih h
· simpa only [forall_prop_of_true, and_true_iff, forall_prop_of_false, bot_le, not_false_iff,
sup_empty, forall_true_iff, not_mem_empty]
· intro h
have incs : (r : Set α) ⊆ ↑(insert a r) := by
rw [Finset.coe_subset]
apply Finset.subset_insert
-- x ∈ s is above the sup of r
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxs, hsx_sup⟩⟩ := ih fun x hx => h x <| incs hx
-- y ∈ s is above a
obtain ⟨y, hys, hay⟩ := h a (Finset.mem_insert_self a r)
-- z ∈ s is above x and y
obtain ⟨z, hzs, ⟨hxz, hyz⟩⟩ := hdir x hxs y hys
use z, hzs
rw [sup_insert, id, sup_le_iff]
exact ⟨le_trans hay hyz, le_trans hsx_sup hxz⟩
#align finset.sup_le_of_le_directed Finset.sup_le_of_le_directed
-- If we acquire sublattices
-- the hypotheses should be reformulated as `s : SubsemilatticeSupBot`
theorem sup_mem (s : Set α) (w₁ : ⊥ ∈ s) (w₂ : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ⊔ y ∈ s)
{ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (p : ι → α) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : t.sup p ∈ s :=
@sup_induction _ _ _ _ _ _ (· ∈ s) w₁ w₂ h
#align finset.sup_mem Finset.sup_mem
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_eq_bot_iff (f : β → α) (S : Finset β) : S.sup f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, f s = ⊥ := by
classical induction' S using Finset.induction with a S _ hi <;> simp [*]
#align finset.sup_eq_bot_iff Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff
end Sup
theorem sup_eq_iSup [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : s.sup f = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a :=
le_antisymm
(Finset.sup_le (fun a ha => le_iSup_of_le a <| le_iSup (fun _ => f a) ha))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun ha => le_sup ha)
#align finset.sup_eq_supr Finset.sup_eq_iSup
theorem sup_id_eq_sSup [CompleteLattice α] (s : Finset α) : s.sup id = sSup s := by
simp [sSup_eq_iSup, sup_eq_iSup]
#align finset.sup_id_eq_Sup Finset.sup_id_eq_sSup
theorem sup_id_set_eq_sUnion (s : Finset (Set α)) : s.sup id = ⋃₀ ↑s :=
sup_id_eq_sSup _
#align finset.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion Finset.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem sup_set_eq_biUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Set β) : s.sup f = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sup_eq_iSup _ _
#align finset.sup_set_eq_bUnion Finset.sup_set_eq_biUnion
theorem sup_eq_sSup_image [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
s.sup f = sSup (f '' s) := by
classical rw [← Finset.coe_image, ← sup_id_eq_sSup, sup_image, Function.id_comp]
#align finset.sup_eq_Sup_image Finset.sup_eq_sSup_image
/-! ### inf -/
section Inf
-- TODO: define with just `[Top α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[OrderTop α]`
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α]
/-- Infimum of a finite set: `inf {a, b, c} f = f a ⊓ f b ⊓ f c` -/
def inf (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold (· ⊓ ·) ⊤ f
#align finset.inf Finset.inf
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f g : β → α} {a : α}
theorem inf_def : s.inf f = (s.1.map f).inf :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_def Finset.inf_def
@[simp]
theorem inf_empty : (∅ : Finset β).inf f = ⊤ :=
fold_empty
#align finset.inf_empty Finset.inf_empty
@[simp]
theorem inf_cons {b : β} (h : b ∉ s) : (cons b s h).inf f = f b ⊓ s.inf f :=
@sup_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align finset.inf_cons Finset.inf_cons
@[simp]
theorem inf_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} : (insert b s : Finset β).inf f = f b ⊓ s.inf f :=
fold_insert_idem
#align finset.inf_insert Finset.inf_insert
@[simp]
theorem inf_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (f : γ → β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image f).inf g = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
fold_image_idem
#align finset.inf_image Finset.inf_image
@[simp]
theorem inf_map (s : Finset γ) (f : γ ↪ β) (g : β → α) : (s.map f).inf g = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
fold_map
#align finset.inf_map Finset.inf_map
@[simp]
theorem inf_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).inf f = f b :=
Multiset.inf_singleton
#align finset.inf_singleton Finset.inf_singleton
theorem inf_inf : s.inf (f ⊓ g) = s.inf f ⊓ s.inf g :=
@sup_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_inf Finset.inf_inf
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Lattice.lean | 370 | 373 | theorem inf_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.inf f = s₂.inf g := by |
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ZPow
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.hermitian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"caa58cbf5bfb7f81ccbaca4e8b8ac4bc2b39cc1c"
/-! # Hermitian matrices
This file defines hermitian matrices and some basic results about them.
See also `IsSelfAdjoint`, which generalizes this definition to other star rings.
## Main definition
* `Matrix.IsHermitian` : a matrix `A : Matrix n n α` is hermitian if `Aᴴ = A`.
## Tags
self-adjoint matrix, hermitian matrix
-/
namespace Matrix
variable {α β : Type*} {m n : Type*} {A : Matrix n n α}
open scoped Matrix
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner α _ _ x y
section Star
variable [Star α] [Star β]
/-- A matrix is hermitian if it is equal to its conjugate transpose. On the reals, this definition
captures symmetric matrices. -/
def IsHermitian (A : Matrix n n α) : Prop := Aᴴ = A
#align matrix.is_hermitian Matrix.IsHermitian
instance (A : Matrix n n α) [Decidable (Aᴴ = A)] : Decidable (IsHermitian A) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (_ = _)
theorem IsHermitian.eq {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) : Aᴴ = A := h
#align matrix.is_hermitian.eq Matrix.IsHermitian.eq
protected theorem IsHermitian.isSelfAdjoint {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) :
IsSelfAdjoint A := h
#align matrix.is_hermitian.is_self_adjoint Matrix.IsHermitian.isSelfAdjoint
-- @[ext] -- Porting note: incorrect ext, not a structure or a lemma proving x = y
theorem IsHermitian.ext {A : Matrix n n α} : (∀ i j, star (A j i) = A i j) → A.IsHermitian := by
intro h; ext i j; exact h i j
#align matrix.is_hermitian.ext Matrix.IsHermitian.ext
theorem IsHermitian.apply {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) (i j : n) : star (A j i) = A i j :=
congr_fun (congr_fun h _) _
#align matrix.is_hermitian.apply Matrix.IsHermitian.apply
theorem IsHermitian.ext_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : A.IsHermitian ↔ ∀ i j, star (A j i) = A i j :=
⟨IsHermitian.apply, IsHermitian.ext⟩
#align matrix.is_hermitian.ext_iff Matrix.IsHermitian.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem IsHermitian.map {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) (f : α → β)
(hf : Function.Semiconj f star star) : (A.map f).IsHermitian :=
(conjTranspose_map f hf).symm.trans <| h.eq.symm ▸ rfl
#align matrix.is_hermitian.map Matrix.IsHermitian.map
theorem IsHermitian.transpose {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) : Aᵀ.IsHermitian := by
rw [IsHermitian, conjTranspose, transpose_map]
exact congr_arg Matrix.transpose h
#align matrix.is_hermitian.transpose Matrix.IsHermitian.transpose
@[simp]
theorem isHermitian_transpose_iff (A : Matrix n n α) : Aᵀ.IsHermitian ↔ A.IsHermitian :=
⟨by intro h; rw [← transpose_transpose A]; exact IsHermitian.transpose h, IsHermitian.transpose⟩
#align matrix.is_hermitian_transpose_iff Matrix.isHermitian_transpose_iff
theorem IsHermitian.conjTranspose {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) : Aᴴ.IsHermitian :=
h.transpose.map _ fun _ => rfl
#align matrix.is_hermitian.conj_transpose Matrix.IsHermitian.conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem IsHermitian.submatrix {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) (f : m → n) :
(A.submatrix f f).IsHermitian := (conjTranspose_submatrix _ _ _).trans (h.symm ▸ rfl)
#align matrix.is_hermitian.submatrix Matrix.IsHermitian.submatrix
@[simp]
theorem isHermitian_submatrix_equiv {A : Matrix n n α} (e : m ≃ n) :
(A.submatrix e e).IsHermitian ↔ A.IsHermitian :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.submatrix e.symm, fun h => h.submatrix _⟩
#align matrix.is_hermitian_submatrix_equiv Matrix.isHermitian_submatrix_equiv
end Star
section InvolutiveStar
variable [InvolutiveStar α]
@[simp]
theorem isHermitian_conjTranspose_iff (A : Matrix n n α) : Aᴴ.IsHermitian ↔ A.IsHermitian :=
IsSelfAdjoint.star_iff
#align matrix.is_hermitian_conj_transpose_iff Matrix.isHermitian_conjTranspose_iff
/-- A block matrix `A.from_blocks B C D` is hermitian,
if `A` and `D` are hermitian and `Bᴴ = C`. -/
theorem IsHermitian.fromBlocks {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α} {C : Matrix n m α}
{D : Matrix n n α} (hA : A.IsHermitian) (hBC : Bᴴ = C) (hD : D.IsHermitian) :
(A.fromBlocks B C D).IsHermitian := by
have hCB : Cᴴ = B := by rw [← hBC, conjTranspose_conjTranspose]
unfold Matrix.IsHermitian
rw [fromBlocks_conjTranspose, hBC, hCB, hA, hD]
#align matrix.is_hermitian.from_blocks Matrix.IsHermitian.fromBlocks
/-- This is the `iff` version of `Matrix.IsHermitian.fromBlocks`. -/
theorem isHermitian_fromBlocks_iff {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α} {C : Matrix n m α}
{D : Matrix n n α} :
(A.fromBlocks B C D).IsHermitian ↔ A.IsHermitian ∧ Bᴴ = C ∧ Cᴴ = B ∧ D.IsHermitian :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨congr_arg toBlocks₁₁ h, congr_arg toBlocks₂₁ h, congr_arg toBlocks₁₂ h,
congr_arg toBlocks₂₂ h⟩,
fun ⟨hA, hBC, _hCB, hD⟩ => IsHermitian.fromBlocks hA hBC hD⟩
#align matrix.is_hermitian_from_blocks_iff Matrix.isHermitian_fromBlocks_iff
end InvolutiveStar
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid α] [StarAddMonoid α] [AddMonoid β] [StarAddMonoid β]
/-- A diagonal matrix is hermitian if the entries are self-adjoint (as a vector) -/
theorem isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (h : IsSelfAdjoint v) :
(diagonal v).IsHermitian :=
(-- TODO: add a `pi.has_trivial_star` instance and remove the `funext`
diagonal_conjTranspose v).trans <| congr_arg _ h
#align matrix.is_hermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint Matrix.isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint
/-- A diagonal matrix is hermitian if each diagonal entry is self-adjoint -/
lemma isHermitian_diagonal_iff [DecidableEq n] {d : n → α} :
IsHermitian (diagonal d) ↔ (∀ i : n, IsSelfAdjoint (d i)) := by
simp [isSelfAdjoint_iff, IsHermitian, conjTranspose, diagonal_transpose, diagonal_map]
/-- A diagonal matrix is hermitian if the entries have the trivial `star` operation
(such as on the reals). -/
@[simp]
theorem isHermitian_diagonal [TrivialStar α] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) :
(diagonal v).IsHermitian :=
isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint _ (IsSelfAdjoint.all _)
#align matrix.is_hermitian_diagonal Matrix.isHermitian_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem isHermitian_zero : (0 : Matrix n n α).IsHermitian :=
isSelfAdjoint_zero _
#align matrix.is_hermitian_zero Matrix.isHermitian_zero
@[simp]
theorem IsHermitian.add {A B : Matrix n n α} (hA : A.IsHermitian) (hB : B.IsHermitian) :
(A + B).IsHermitian :=
IsSelfAdjoint.add hA hB
#align matrix.is_hermitian.add Matrix.IsHermitian.add
end AddMonoid
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [StarAddMonoid α]
theorem isHermitian_add_transpose_self (A : Matrix n n α) : (A + Aᴴ).IsHermitian :=
isSelfAdjoint_add_star_self A
#align matrix.is_hermitian_add_transpose_self Matrix.isHermitian_add_transpose_self
theorem isHermitian_transpose_add_self (A : Matrix n n α) : (Aᴴ + A).IsHermitian :=
isSelfAdjoint_star_add_self A
#align matrix.is_hermitian_transpose_add_self Matrix.isHermitian_transpose_add_self
end AddCommMonoid
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup α] [StarAddMonoid α]
@[simp]
theorem IsHermitian.neg {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) : (-A).IsHermitian :=
IsSelfAdjoint.neg h
#align matrix.is_hermitian.neg Matrix.IsHermitian.neg
@[simp]
theorem IsHermitian.sub {A B : Matrix n n α} (hA : A.IsHermitian) (hB : B.IsHermitian) :
(A - B).IsHermitian :=
IsSelfAdjoint.sub hA hB
#align matrix.is_hermitian.sub Matrix.IsHermitian.sub
end AddGroup
section NonUnitalSemiring
variable [NonUnitalSemiring α] [StarRing α] [NonUnitalSemiring β] [StarRing β]
/-- Note this is more general than `IsSelfAdjoint.mul_star_self` as `B` can be rectangular. -/
theorem isHermitian_mul_conjTranspose_self [Fintype n] (A : Matrix m n α) :
(A * Aᴴ).IsHermitian := by rw [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_mul, conjTranspose_conjTranspose]
#align matrix.is_hermitian_mul_conj_transpose_self Matrix.isHermitian_mul_conjTranspose_self
/-- Note this is more general than `IsSelfAdjoint.star_mul_self` as `B` can be rectangular. -/
theorem isHermitian_transpose_mul_self [Fintype m] (A : Matrix m n α) : (Aᴴ * A).IsHermitian := by
rw [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_mul, conjTranspose_conjTranspose]
#align matrix.is_hermitian_transpose_mul_self Matrix.isHermitian_transpose_mul_self
/-- Note this is more general than `IsSelfAdjoint.conjugate'` as `B` can be rectangular. -/
theorem isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul [Fintype m] {A : Matrix m m α} (B : Matrix m n α)
(hA : A.IsHermitian) : (Bᴴ * A * B).IsHermitian := by
simp only [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_mul, conjTranspose_conjTranspose, hA.eq, Matrix.mul_assoc]
#align matrix.is_hermitian_conj_transpose_mul_mul Matrix.isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul
/-- Note this is more general than `IsSelfAdjoint.conjugate` as `B` can be rectangular. -/
theorem isHermitian_mul_mul_conjTranspose [Fintype m] {A : Matrix m m α} (B : Matrix n m α)
(hA : A.IsHermitian) : (B * A * Bᴴ).IsHermitian := by
simp only [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_mul, conjTranspose_conjTranspose, hA.eq, Matrix.mul_assoc]
#align matrix.is_hermitian_mul_mul_conj_transpose Matrix.isHermitian_mul_mul_conjTranspose
lemma commute_iff [Fintype n] {A B : Matrix n n α}
(hA : A.IsHermitian) (hB : B.IsHermitian) : Commute A B ↔ (A * B).IsHermitian :=
hA.isSelfAdjoint.commute_iff hB.isSelfAdjoint
end NonUnitalSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] [StarRing α] [Semiring β] [StarRing β]
/-- Note this is more general for matrices than `isSelfAdjoint_one` as it does not
require `Fintype n`, which is necessary for `Monoid (Matrix n n R)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isHermitian_one [DecidableEq n] : (1 : Matrix n n α).IsHermitian :=
conjTranspose_one
#align matrix.is_hermitian_one Matrix.isHermitian_one
theorem IsHermitian.pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsHermitian) (k : ℕ) :
(A ^ k).IsHermitian := IsSelfAdjoint.pow h _
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing α] [StarRing α]
theorem IsHermitian.inv [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {A : Matrix m m α} (hA : A.IsHermitian) :
A⁻¹.IsHermitian := by simp [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_nonsing_inv, hA.eq]
#align matrix.is_hermitian.inv Matrix.IsHermitian.inv
@[simp]
theorem isHermitian_inv [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix m m α) [Invertible A] :
A⁻¹.IsHermitian ↔ A.IsHermitian :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← inv_inv_of_invertible A]; exact IsHermitian.inv h, IsHermitian.inv⟩
#align matrix.is_hermitian_inv Matrix.isHermitian_inv
theorem IsHermitian.adjugate [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {A : Matrix m m α} (hA : A.IsHermitian) :
A.adjugate.IsHermitian := by simp [IsHermitian, adjugate_conjTranspose, hA.eq]
#align matrix.is_hermitian.adjugate Matrix.IsHermitian.adjugate
/-- Note that `IsSelfAdjoint.zpow` does not apply to matrices as they are not a division ring. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Hermitian.lean | 267 | 270 | theorem IsHermitian.zpow [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {A : Matrix m m α} (h : A.IsHermitian)
(k : ℤ) :
(A ^ k).IsHermitian := by |
rw [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_zpow, h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
#align_import group_theory.order_of_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d07245fd37786daa997af4f1a73a49fa3b748408"
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
#align is_periodic_pt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one
#align is_periodic_pt_add_iff_nsmul_eq_zero isPeriodicPt_add_iff_nsmul_eq_zero
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
#align is_of_fin_order IsOfFinOrder
#align is_of_fin_add_order IsOfFinAddOrder
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_of_fin_add_order_of_mul_iff isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
#align is_of_fin_order_of_add_iff isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
#align is_of_fin_order_iff_pow_eq_one isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
#align is_of_fin_add_order_iff_nsmul_eq_zero isOfFinAddOrder_iff_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [Group G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
cases' (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
#align not_is_of_fin_order_of_injective_pow not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow
#align not_is_of_fin_add_order_of_injective_nsmul not_isOfFinAddOrder_of_injective_nsmul
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
#align is_of_fin_order_iff_coe Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe
#align is_of_fin_add_order_iff_coe AddSubmonoid.isOfFinAddOrder_coe
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
#align monoid_hom.is_of_fin_order MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder
#align add_monoid_hom.is_of_fin_order AddMonoidHom.isOfFinAddOrder
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
#align is_of_fin_order.apply IsOfFinOrder.apply
#align is_of_fin_add_order.apply IsOfFinAddOrder.apply
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
#align is_of_fin_order_one isOfFinOrder_one
#align is_of_fin_order_zero isOfFinAddOrder_zero
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
#align order_of orderOf
#align add_order_of addOrderOf
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
#align add_order_of_of_mul_eq_order_of addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
#align order_of_of_add_eq_add_order_of orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
#align order_of_pos' IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
#align add_order_of_pos' IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
#align pow_order_of_eq_one pow_orderOf_eq_one
#align add_order_of_nsmul_eq_zero addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
#align order_of_eq_zero orderOf_eq_zero
#align add_order_of_eq_zero addOrderOf_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
#align order_of_eq_zero_iff orderOf_eq_zero_iff
#align add_order_of_eq_zero_iff addOrderOf_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
#align order_of_eq_zero_iff' orderOf_eq_zero_iff'
#align add_order_of_eq_zero_iff' addOrderOf_eq_zero_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
#align order_of_eq_iff orderOf_eq_iff
#align add_order_of_eq_iff addOrderOf_eq_iff
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align order_of_pos_iff orderOf_pos_iff
#align add_order_of_pos_iff addOrderOf_pos_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
#align is_of_fin_order.mono IsOfFinOrder.mono
#align is_of_fin_add_order.mono IsOfFinAddOrder.mono
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf' (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
#align pow_ne_one_of_lt_order_of' pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf'
#align nsmul_ne_zero_of_lt_add_order_of' nsmul_ne_zero_of_lt_addOrderOf'
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
#align order_of_le_of_pow_eq_one orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one
#align add_order_of_le_of_nsmul_eq_zero addOrderOf_le_of_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1:G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
#align order_of_one orderOf_one
#align order_of_zero addOrderOf_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
#align order_of_eq_one_iff orderOf_eq_one_iff
#align add_monoid.order_of_eq_one_iff AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
#align pow_eq_mod_order_of pow_mod_orderOf
#align nsmul_eq_mod_add_order_of mod_addOrderOf_nsmul
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
#align order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
#align add_order_of_dvd_of_nsmul_eq_zero addOrderOf_dvd_of_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
#align order_of_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one
#align add_order_of_dvd_iff_nsmul_eq_zero addOrderOf_dvd_iff_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
#align order_of_pow_dvd orderOf_pow_dvd
#align add_order_of_smul_dvd addOrderOf_smul_dvd
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
#align pow_injective_of_lt_order_of pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf
#align nsmul_injective_of_lt_add_order_of nsmul_injOn_Iio_addOrderOf
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
#align mem_powers_iff_mem_range_order_of' IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
#align mem_multiples_iff_mem_range_add_order_of' IsOfFinAddOrder.mem_multiples_iff_mem_range_addOrderOf
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias IsOfFinAddOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf :=
IsOfFinAddOrder.multiples_eq_image_range_addOrderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
#align pow_eq_one_iff_modeq pow_eq_one_iff_modEq
#align nsmul_eq_zero_iff_modeq nsmul_eq_zero_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
#align order_of_map_dvd orderOf_map_dvd
#align add_order_of_map_dvd addOrderOf_map_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
#align exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime
#align exists_nsmul_eq_self_of_coprime exists_nsmul_eq_self_of_coprime
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
cases' exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx) with a ha
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
#align order_of_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime
#align add_order_of_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
#align order_of_eq_order_of_iff orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff
#align add_order_of_eq_add_order_of_iff addOrderOf_eq_addOrderOf_iff
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
#align order_of_injective orderOf_injective
#align add_order_of_injective addOrderOf_injective
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
#align order_of_submonoid orderOf_submonoid
#align order_of_add_submonoid addOrderOf_addSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
#align order_of_units orderOf_units
#align order_of_add_units addOrderOf_addUnits
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable
def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 410 | 412 | theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by |
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# The complex `log` function
Basic properties, relationship with `exp`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped Real Topology ComplexConjugate
/-- Inverse of the `exp` function. Returns values such that `(log x).im > - π` and `(log x).im ≤ π`.
`log 0 = 0`-/
-- Porting note: @[pp_nodot] does not exist in mathlib4
noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ :=
x.abs.log + arg x * I
#align complex.log Complex.log
theorem log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_re Complex.log_re
theorem log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_im Complex.log_im
theorem neg_pi_lt_log_im (x : ℂ) : -π < (log x).im := by simp only [log_im, neg_pi_lt_arg]
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im Complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im
theorem log_im_le_pi (x : ℂ) : (log x).im ≤ π := by simp only [log_im, arg_le_pi]
#align complex.log_im_le_pi Complex.log_im_le_pi
theorem exp_log {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [log, exp_add_mul_I, ← ofReal_sin, sin_arg, ← ofReal_cos, cos_arg hx, ← ofReal_exp,
Real.exp_log (abs.pos hx), mul_add, ofReal_div, ofReal_div,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.2 <| abs.ne_zero hx), ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.2 <| abs.ne_zero hx), re_add_im]
#align complex.exp_log Complex.exp_log
@[simp]
theorem range_exp : Set.range exp = {0}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨by
rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact exp_ne_zero x, fun hx => ⟨log x, exp_log hx⟩⟩
#align complex.range_exp Complex.range_exp
theorem log_exp {x : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π) : log (exp x) = x := by
rw [log, abs_exp, Real.log_exp, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, ← ofReal_exp,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (Real.exp_pos _) ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, re_add_im]
#align complex.log_exp Complex.log_exp
theorem exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi {x y : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π) (hy₁ : -π < y.im)
(hy₂ : y.im ≤ π) (hxy : exp x = exp y) : x = y := by
rw [← log_exp hx₁ hx₂, ← log_exp hy₁ hy₂, hxy]
#align complex.exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi Complex.exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi
theorem ofReal_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (x.log : ℂ) = log x :=
Complex.ext (by rw [log_re, ofReal_re, abs_of_nonneg hx])
(by rw [ofReal_im, log_im, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx])
#align complex.of_real_log Complex.ofReal_log
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_log {n : ℕ} : Real.log n = log n := ofReal_natCast n ▸ ofReal_log n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_log {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Real.log (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = log (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
natCast_log
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Log.lean | 83 | 83 | theorem log_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (log (x : ℂ)).re = Real.log x := by | simp [log_re]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
#align real.log Real.log
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
#align real.log_of_ne_zero Real.log_of_ne_zero
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.log_of_pos Real.log_of_pos
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align real.exp_log_eq_abs Real.exp_log_eq_abs
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.exp_log Real.exp_log
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
#align real.exp_log_of_neg Real.exp_log_of_neg
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
#align real.le_exp_log Real.le_exp_log
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
#align real.log_exp Real.log_exp
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.surj_on_log Real.surjOn_log
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.log_surjective Real.log_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
#align real.range_log Real.range_log
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align real.log_zero Real.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
#align real.log_one Real.log_one
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
#align real.log_abs Real.log_abs
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
#align real.log_neg_eq_log Real.log_neg_eq_log
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.sinh_log Real.sinh_log
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.cosh_log Real.cosh_log
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
#align real.surj_on_log' Real.surjOn_log'
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
#align real.log_mul Real.log_mul
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
#align real.log_div Real.log_div
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
#align real.log_inv Real.log_inv
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
#align real.log_le_log Real.log_le_log_iff
@[gcongr]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
#align real.log_lt_log Real.log_lt_log
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
#align real.log_lt_log_iff Real.log_lt_log_iff
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_le_iff_le_exp Real.log_le_iff_le_exp
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp Real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.le_log_iff_exp_le Real.le_log_iff_exp_le
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
#align real.log_pos_iff Real.log_pos_iff
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)).2 hx
#align real.log_pos Real.log_pos
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
#align real.log_neg_iff Real.log_neg_iff
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
#align real.log_neg Real.log_neg
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
#align real.log_nonneg_iff Real.log_nonneg_iff
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
#align real.log_nonneg Real.log_nonneg
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx, not_lt]
#align real.log_nonpos_iff Real.log_nonpos_iff
theorem log_nonpos_iff' (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
exact log_nonpos_iff hx
#align real.log_nonpos_iff' Real.log_nonpos_iff'
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff' hx).2 h'x
#align real.log_nonpos Real.log_nonpos
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_nat_cast_nonneg := log_natCast_nonneg
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_neg_nat_cast_nonneg := log_neg_natCast_nonneg
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_int_cast_nonneg := log_intCast_nonneg
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
#align real.strict_mono_on_log Real.strictMonoOn_log
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
#align real.strict_anti_on_log Real.strictAntiOn_log
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
#align real.log_inj_on_pos Real.log_injOn_pos
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
#align real.log_lt_sub_one_of_pos Real.log_lt_sub_one_of_pos
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
#align real.eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero Real.eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
#align real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one Real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
#align real.log_eq_zero Real.log_eq_zero
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
#align real.log_ne_zero Real.log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [pow_succ, log_mul (pow_ne_zero _ hx) hx, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul]
#align real.log_pow Real.log_pow
@[simp]
theorem log_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast, log_pow, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [zpow_negSucc, log_inv, log_pow, Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
#align real.log_zpow Real.log_zpow
theorem log_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log (√x) = log x / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff, mul_comm, ← Nat.cast_two, ← log_pow, sq_sqrt hx]
exact two_ne_zero
#align real.log_sqrt Real.log_sqrt
theorem log_le_sub_one_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ x - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le]
convert add_one_le_exp (log x)
rw [exp_log hx]
#align real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos Real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos
/-- Bound for `|log x * x|` in the interval `(0, 1]`. -/
theorem abs_log_mul_self_lt (x : ℝ) (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) : |log x * x| < 1 := by
have : 0 < 1 / x := by simpa only [one_div, inv_pos] using h1
replace := log_le_sub_one_of_pos this
replace : log (1 / x) < 1 / x := by linarith
rw [log_div one_ne_zero h1.ne', log_one, zero_sub, lt_div_iff h1] at this
have aux : 0 ≤ -log x * x := by
refine mul_nonneg ?_ h1.le
rw [← log_inv]
apply log_nonneg
rw [← le_inv h1 zero_lt_one, inv_one]
exact h2
rw [← abs_of_nonneg aux, neg_mul, abs_neg] at this
exact this
#align real.abs_log_mul_self_lt Real.abs_log_mul_self_lt
/-- The real logarithm function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_log_atTop : Tendsto log atTop atTop :=
tendsto_comp_exp_atTop.1 <| by simpa only [log_exp] using tendsto_id
#align real.tendsto_log_at_top Real.tendsto_log_atTop
theorem tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[≠] 0) atBot := by
rw [← show _ = log from funext log_abs]
refine Tendsto.comp (g := log) ?_ tendsto_abs_nhdsWithin_zero
simpa [← tendsto_comp_exp_atBot] using tendsto_id
#align real.tendsto_log_nhds_within_zero Real.tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero
lemma tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero_right : Tendsto log (𝓝[>] 0) atBot :=
tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _ h ↦ ne_of_gt h
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 356 | 360 | theorem continuousOn_log : ContinuousOn log {0}ᶜ := by |
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict,
restrict]
conv in log _ => rw [log_of_ne_zero (show (x : ℝ) ≠ 0 from x.2)]
exact expOrderIso.symm.continuous.comp (continuous_subtype_val.norm.subtype_mk _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import group_theory.subgroup.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
/-!
# Subgroups
This file defines multiplicative and additive subgroups as an extension of submonoids, in a bundled
form (unbundled subgroups are in `Deprecated/Subgroups.lean`).
We prove subgroups of a group form a complete lattice, and results about images and preimages of
subgroups under group homomorphisms. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid homomorphisms.
There are also theorems about the subgroups generated by an element or a subset of a group,
defined both inductively and as the infimum of the set of subgroups containing a given
element/subset.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup G` : the type of subgroups of a group `G`
* `AddSubgroup A` : the type of subgroups of an additive group `A`
* `CompleteLattice (Subgroup G)` : the subgroups of `G` form a complete lattice
* `Subgroup.closure k` : the minimal subgroup that includes the set `k`
* `Subgroup.subtype` : the natural group homomorphism from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`
* `Subgroup.gi` : `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set
* `Subgroup.comap H f` : the preimage of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.map f H` : the image of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
* `MonoidHom.range f` : the range of the group homomorphism `f` is a subgroup
* `MonoidHom.ker f` : the kernel of a group homomorphism `f` is the subgroup of elements `x : G`
such that `f x = 1`
* `MonoidHom.eq_locus f g` : given group homomorphisms `f`, `g`, the elements of `G` such that
`f x = g x` form a subgroup of `G`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
open Function
open Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
/-- `InvMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under inverses. -/
class InvMemClass (S G : Type*) [Inv G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s
#align inv_mem_class InvMemClass
export InvMemClass (inv_mem)
/-- `NegMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under negation. -/
class NegMemClass (S G : Type*) [Neg G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → -x ∈ s
#align neg_mem_class NegMemClass
export NegMemClass (neg_mem)
/-- `SubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are subgroups of `G`. -/
class SubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends SubmonoidClass S G,
InvMemClass S G : Prop
#align subgroup_class SubgroupClass
/-- `AddSubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are
additive subgroups of `G`. -/
class AddSubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [SubNegMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends AddSubmonoidClass S G,
NegMemClass S G : Prop
#align add_subgroup_class AddSubgroupClass
attribute [to_additive] InvMemClass SubgroupClass
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] inv_mem neg_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mem_iff {S G} [InvolutiveInv G] {_ : SetLike S G} [InvMemClass S G] {H : S}
{x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ inv_mem h, inv_mem⟩
#align inv_mem_iff inv_mem_iff
#align neg_mem_iff neg_mem_iff
@[simp] theorem abs_mem_iff {S G} [AddGroup G] [LinearOrder G] {_ : SetLike S G}
[NegMemClass S G] {H : S} {x : G} : |x| ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H := by
cases abs_choice x <;> simp [*]
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"An additive subgroup is closed under subtraction."]
theorem div_mem {x y : M} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact mul_mem hx (inv_mem hy)
#align div_mem div_mem
#align sub_mem sub_mem
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))]
theorem zpow_mem {x : M} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K
| (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact pow_mem hx n
| -[n+1] => by
rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact inv_mem (pow_mem hx n.succ)
#align zpow_mem zpow_mem
#align zsmul_mem zsmul_mem
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
#align div_mem_comm_iff div_mem_comm_iff
#align sub_mem_comm_iff sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive /-(attr := simp)-/] -- Porting note: `simp` cannot simplify LHS
theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ H ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, P x := by
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, inv_mem x_in, by simp [hx]⟩
#align exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hba => by simpa using mul_mem hba (inv_mem h), fun hb => mul_mem hb h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_right mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_mem_cancel_right add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hab => by simpa using mul_mem (inv_mem h) hab, mul_mem h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_left mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_mem_cancel_left add_mem_cancel_left
namespace InvMemClass
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [Inv G] [SetLike S G]
[InvMemClass S G] {H : S} : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_inv InvMemClass.inv
#align add_subgroup_class.has_neg NegMemClass.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : (x⁻¹).1 = x.1⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_inv InvMemClass.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_neg NegMemClass.coe_neg
end InvMemClass
namespace SubgroupClass
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-15"))] alias coe_inv := InvMemClass.coe_inv
-- Here we assume H, K, and L are subgroups, but in fact any one of them
-- could be allowed to be a subsemigroup.
-- Counterexample where K and L are submonoids: H = ℤ, K = ℕ, L = -ℕ
-- Counterexample where H and K are submonoids: H = {n | n = 0 ∨ 3 ≤ n}, K = 3ℕ + 4ℕ, L = 5ℤ
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_union {H K L : S} : (H : Set G) ⊆ K ∪ L ↔ H ≤ K ∨ H ≤ L := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h x xH ↦ h.imp (· xH) (· xH)⟩
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists]
exact fun ⟨x, xH, xK⟩ y yH ↦ (h <| mul_mem xH yH).elim
((h yH).resolve_left fun yK ↦ xK <| (mul_mem_cancel_right yK).mp ·)
(mul_mem_cancel_left <| (h xH).resolve_left xK).mp
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G]
[SubgroupClass S G] {H : S} : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_div SubgroupClass.div
#align add_subgroup_class.has_sub AddSubgroupClass.sub
/-- An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroupClass.zsmul {M S} [SubNegMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a.1, zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup_class.has_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power. -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow {M S} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [SubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a.1 ^ n, zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_zpow SubgroupClass.zpow
-- Porting note: additive align statement is given above
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (x / y).1 = x.1 / y.1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_div SubgroupClass.coe_div
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_sub AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub
variable (H)
-- Prefer subclasses of `Group` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance (priority := 75) toGroup : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_group SubgroupClass.toGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddGroup
-- Prefer subclasses of `CommGroup` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance (priority := 75) toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] :
CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_comm_group SubgroupClass.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"The natural group hom from an additive subgroup of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.subtype SubgroupClass.subtype
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype AddSubgroupClass.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : (SubgroupClass.subtype H : H → G) = ((↑) : H → G) := by
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_subtype SubgroupClass.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_subtype AddSubgroupClass.coeSubtype
variable {H}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_pow SubgroupClass.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_smul AddSubgroupClass.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_zpow SubgroupClass.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.coe_zsmul
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : S} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.prop⟩) fun _ _=> rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion AddSubgroupClass.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_self (x : H) : inclusion le_rfl x = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_self SubgroupClass.inclusion_self
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_self AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_mk {h : H ≤ K} (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = ⟨x, h hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_mk SubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_mk AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_right (h : H ≤ K) (x : K) (hx : (x : G) ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_right SubgroupClass.inclusion_right
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_right AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_right
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_inclusion {L : S} (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) (x : H) :
inclusion hKL (inclusion hHK x) = inclusion (hHK.trans hKL) x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : S} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup_class.coe_inclusion SubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : S} (hH : H ≤ K) :
(SubgroupClass.subtype K).comp (inclusion hH) = SubgroupClass.subtype H := by
ext
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, coeSubtype, coe_inclusion]
#align subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion SubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
end SubgroupClass
end SubgroupClass
/-- A subgroup of a group `G` is a subset containing 1, closed under multiplication
and closed under multiplicative inverse. -/
structure Subgroup (G : Type*) [Group G] extends Submonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align subgroup Subgroup
/-- An additive subgroup of an additive group `G` is a subset containing 0, closed
under addition and additive inverse. -/
structure AddSubgroup (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddSubmonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → -x ∈ carrier
#align add_subgroup AddSubgroup
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup
-- Porting note: Removed, translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid] Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `Subgroup` as a `Submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subgroup.toSubmonoid
#align subgroup.to_submonoid Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret an `AddSubgroup` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (Subgroup G) G where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hp,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := p
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hq,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := q
congr
-- Porting note: Below can probably be written more uniformly
@[to_additive]
instance : SubgroupClass (Subgroup G) G where
inv_mem := Subgroup.inv_mem' _
one_mem _ := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).one_mem'
mul_mem := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).mul_mem'
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_carrier Subgroup.mem_carrier
#align add_subgroup.mem_carrier AddSubgroup.mem_carrier
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mk {s : Set G} {x : G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
x ∈ mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_mk Subgroup.mem_mk
#align add_subgroup.mem_mk AddSubgroup.mem_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_set_mk {s : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
(mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_set_mk Subgroup.coe_set_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_set_mk AddSubgroup.coe_set_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_le_mk {s t : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) (h_one') (h_mul') (h_inv') :
mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ≤ mk ⟨⟨t, h_one'⟩, h_mul'⟩ h_inv' ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mk_le_mk Subgroup.mk_le_mk
#align add_subgroup.mk_le_mk AddSubgroup.mk_le_mk
initialize_simps_projections Subgroup (carrier → coe)
initialize_simps_projections AddSubgroup (carrier → coe)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) : (K.toSubmonoid : Set G) = K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_to_submonoid Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.coe_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.coe_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) (x : G) : x ∈ K.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_to_submonoid Subgroup.mem_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.mem_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.mem_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
-- fun p q h => SetLike.ext'_iff.2 (show _ from SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h)
fun p q h => by
have := SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h
rw [coe_toSubmonoid, coe_toSubmonoid] at this
exact SetLike.ext'_iff.2 this
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_injective Subgroup.toSubmonoid_injective
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_injective AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_eq {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid = q.toSubmonoid ↔ p = q :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_eq Subgroup.toSubmonoid_eq
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_eq AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_eq
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) := fun _ _ =>
id
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_strictMono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_mono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_mono
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_le {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid ≤ q.toSubmonoid ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_le Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_le AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_nonempty (s : Subgroup G) : (s : Set G).Nonempty := ⟨1, one_mem _⟩
end Subgroup
/-!
### Conversion to/from `Additive`/`Multiplicative`
-/
section mul_add
/-- Subgroups of a group `G` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `Additive G`. -/
@[simps!]
def Subgroup.toAddSubgroup : Subgroup G ≃o AddSubgroup (Additive G) where
toFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
invFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup Subgroup.toAddSubgroup
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_apply_coe
/-- Additive subgroup of an additive group `Additive G` are isomorphic to subgroup of `G`. -/
abbrev AddSubgroup.toSubgroup' : AddSubgroup (Additive G) ≃o Subgroup G :=
Subgroup.toAddSubgroup.symm
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup' AddSubgroup.toSubgroup'
/-- Additive subgroups of an additive group `A` are isomorphic to subgroups of `Multiplicative A`.
-/
@[simps!]
def AddSubgroup.toSubgroup : AddSubgroup A ≃o Subgroup (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
invFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup AddSubgroup.toSubgroup
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
/-- Subgroups of an additive group `Multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `A`.
-/
abbrev Subgroup.toAddSubgroup' : Subgroup (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubgroup A :=
AddSubgroup.toSubgroup.symm
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup' Subgroup.toAddSubgroup'
end mul_add
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
/-- Copy of a subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an additive subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities"]
protected def copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = K) : Subgroup G where
carrier := s
one_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.one_mem'
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.mul_mem'
inv_mem' hx := by simpa [hs] using hx -- Porting note: `▸` didn't work here
#align subgroup.copy Subgroup.copy
#align add_subgroup.copy AddSubgroup.copy
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : (K.copy s hs : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_copy Subgroup.coe_copy
#align add_subgroup.coe_copy AddSubgroup.coe_copy
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : K.copy s hs = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subgroup.copy_eq Subgroup.copy_eq
#align add_subgroup.copy_eq AddSubgroup.copy_eq
/-- Two subgroups are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two `AddSubgroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {H K : Subgroup G} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ H ↔ x ∈ K) : H = K :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subgroup.ext Subgroup.ext
#align add_subgroup.ext AddSubgroup.ext
/-- A subgroup contains the group's 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` contains the group's 0."]
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ H :=
one_mem _
#align subgroup.one_mem Subgroup.one_mem
#align add_subgroup.zero_mem AddSubgroup.zero_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under addition."]
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : G} : x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H :=
mul_mem
#align subgroup.mul_mem Subgroup.mul_mem
#align add_subgroup.add_mem AddSubgroup.add_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under inverse."]
protected theorem inv_mem {x : G} : x ∈ H → x⁻¹ ∈ H :=
inv_mem
#align subgroup.inv_mem Subgroup.inv_mem
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem AddSubgroup.neg_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under subtraction."]
protected theorem div_mem {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H :=
div_mem hx hy
#align subgroup.div_mem Subgroup.div_mem
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem AddSubgroup.sub_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_mem_iff {x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
inv_mem_iff
#align subgroup.inv_mem_iff Subgroup.inv_mem_iff
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem_iff AddSubgroup.neg_mem_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
#align subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff Subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff AddSubgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem (K : Subgroup G) {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ K ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, P x :=
exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem Subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align add_subgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem AddSubgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_right h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_right AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_left h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_left AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem pow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
pow_mem hx
#align subgroup.pow_mem Subgroup.pow_mem
#align add_subgroup.nsmul_mem AddSubgroup.nsmul_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem zpow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
zpow_mem hx
#align subgroup.zpow_mem Subgroup.zpow_mem
#align add_subgroup.zsmul_mem AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem
/-- Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under subtraction"]
def ofDiv (s : Set G) (hsn : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x * y⁻¹ ∈ s) :
Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s := by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hsn
simpa using hs x hx x hx
have inv_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s := fun x hx => by simpa using hs 1 one_mem x hx
{ carrier := s
one_mem' := one_mem
inv_mem' := inv_mem _
mul_mem' := fun hx hy => by simpa using hs _ hx _ (inv_mem _ hy) }
#align subgroup.of_div Subgroup.ofDiv
#align add_subgroup.of_sub AddSubgroup.ofSub
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an addition."]
instance mul : Mul H :=
H.toSubmonoid.mul
#align subgroup.has_mul Subgroup.mul
#align add_subgroup.has_add AddSubgroup.add
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a zero."]
instance one : One H :=
H.toSubmonoid.one
#align subgroup.has_one Subgroup.one
#align add_subgroup.has_zero AddSubgroup.zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, H.inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_inv Subgroup.inv
#align add_subgroup.has_neg AddSubgroup.neg
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, H.div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_div Subgroup.div
#align add_subgroup.has_sub AddSubgroup.sub
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a natural scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.nsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℕ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.nsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_nsmul AddSubgroup.nsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a natural power -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected instance npow : Pow H ℕ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.pow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_npow Subgroup.npow
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.zsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_zsmul AddSubgroup.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_zpow Subgroup.zpow
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul (x y : H) : (↑(x * y) : G) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mul Subgroup.coe_mul
#align add_subgroup.coe_add AddSubgroup.coe_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : H) : G) = 1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_one Subgroup.coe_one
#align add_subgroup.coe_zero AddSubgroup.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : ↑(x⁻¹ : H) = (x⁻¹ : G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inv Subgroup.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup.coe_neg AddSubgroup.coe_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (↑(x / y) : G) = ↑x / ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_div Subgroup.coe_div
#align add_subgroup.coe_sub AddSubgroup.coe_sub
-- Porting note: removed simp, theorem has variable as head symbol
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mk (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : ((⟨x, hx⟩ : H) : G) = x :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mk Subgroup.coe_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_mk AddSubgroup.coe_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_pow Subgroup.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup.coe_nsmul AddSubgroup.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_zpow Subgroup.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup.coe_zsmul AddSubgroup.coe_zsmul
@[to_additive] -- This can be proved by `Submonoid.mk_eq_one`
theorem mk_eq_one {g : G} {h} : (⟨g, h⟩ : H) = 1 ↔ g = 1 := by simp
#align subgroup.mk_eq_one_iff Subgroup.mk_eq_one
#align add_subgroup.mk_eq_zero_iff AddSubgroup.mk_eq_zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance toGroup {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_group Subgroup.toGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_group AddSubgroup.toAddGroup
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (H : Subgroup G) : CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_comm_group Subgroup.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroup.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural group hom from an `AddSubgroup` of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align subgroup.subtype Subgroup.subtype
#align add_subgroup.subtype AddSubgroup.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : ⇑ H.subtype = ((↑) : H → G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_subtype Subgroup.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup.coe_subtype AddSubgroup.coeSubtype
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_injective : Function.Injective (Subgroup.subtype H) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.subtype_injective Subgroup.subtype_injective
#align add_subgroup.subtype_injective AddSubgroup.subtype_injective
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.2⟩) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.inclusion Subgroup.inclusion
#align add_subgroup.inclusion AddSubgroup.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 785 | 787 | theorem coe_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by |
cases a
simp only [inclusion, coe_mk, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.SemiNormedGroupCat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Quotient
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
#align_import analysis.normed.group.SemiNormedGroup.kernels from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"17ef379e997badd73e5eabb4d38f11919ab3c4b3"
/-!
# Kernels and cokernels in SemiNormedGroupCat₁ and SemiNormedGroupCat
We show that `SemiNormedGroupCat₁` has cokernels
(for which of course the `cokernel.π f` maps are norm non-increasing),
as well as the easier result that `SemiNormedGroupCat` has cokernels. We also show that
`SemiNormedGroupCat` has kernels.
So far, I don't see a way to state nicely what we really want:
`SemiNormedGroupCat` has cokernels, and `cokernel.π f` is norm non-increasing.
The problem is that the limits API doesn't promise you any particular model of the cokernel,
and in `SemiNormedGroupCat` one can always take a cokernel and rescale its norm
(and hence making `cokernel.π f` arbitrarily large in norm), obtaining another categorical cokernel.
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
universe u
namespace SemiNormedGroupCat₁
noncomputable section
/-- Auxiliary definition for `HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat₁`. -/
def cokernelCocone {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat₁.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Cofork f 0 :=
Cofork.ofπ
(@SemiNormedGroupCat₁.mkHom _ (SemiNormedGroupCat.of (Y ⧸ NormedAddGroupHom.range f.1))
f.1.range.normedMk (NormedAddGroupHom.isQuotientQuotient _).norm_le)
(by
ext x
-- Porting note(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026): was
-- simp only [comp_apply, Limits.zero_comp, NormedAddGroupHom.zero_apply,
-- SemiNormedGroupCat₁.mkHom_apply, SemiNormedGroupCat₁.zero_apply,
-- ← NormedAddGroupHom.mem_ker, f.1.range.ker_normedMk, f.1.mem_range]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [Limits.zero_comp, comp_apply, SemiNormedGroupCat₁.mkHom_apply,
SemiNormedGroupCat₁.zero_apply, ← NormedAddGroupHom.mem_ker, f.1.range.ker_normedMk,
f.1.mem_range]
use x
rfl)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup₁.cokernel_cocone SemiNormedGroupCat₁.cokernelCocone
/-- Auxiliary definition for `HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat₁`. -/
def cokernelLift {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat₁.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (s : CokernelCofork f) :
(cokernelCocone f).pt ⟶ s.pt := by
fconstructor
-- The lift itself:
· apply NormedAddGroupHom.lift _ s.π.1
rintro _ ⟨b, rfl⟩
change (f ≫ s.π) b = 0
simp
-- This used to be the end of the proof before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [zero_apply]
-- The lift has norm at most one:
exact NormedAddGroupHom.lift_normNoninc _ _ _ s.π.2
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup₁.cokernel_lift SemiNormedGroupCat₁.cokernelLift
instance : HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat₁.{u} where
has_colimit f :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := cokernelCocone f
isColimit :=
isColimitAux _ (cokernelLift f)
(fun s => by
ext
apply NormedAddGroupHom.lift_mk f.1.range
rintro _ ⟨b, rfl⟩
change (f ≫ s.π) b = 0
simp
-- This used to be the end of the proof before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [zero_apply])
fun s m w =>
Subtype.eq
(NormedAddGroupHom.lift_unique f.1.range _ _ _ (congr_arg Subtype.val w : _)) }
-- Sanity check
example : HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat₁ := by infer_instance
end
end SemiNormedGroupCat₁
namespace SemiNormedGroupCat
section EqualizersAndKernels
-- Porting note: these weren't needed in Lean 3
instance {V W : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} : Sub (V ⟶ W) :=
(inferInstance : Sub (NormedAddGroupHom V W))
noncomputable instance {V W : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} : Norm (V ⟶ W) :=
(inferInstance : Norm (NormedAddGroupHom V W))
noncomputable instance {V W : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} : NNNorm (V ⟶ W) :=
(inferInstance : NNNorm (NormedAddGroupHom V W))
/-- The equalizer cone for a parallel pair of morphisms of seminormed groups. -/
def fork {V W : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f g : V ⟶ W) : Fork f g :=
@Fork.ofι _ _ _ _ _ _ (of (f - g : NormedAddGroupHom V W).ker)
(NormedAddGroupHom.incl (f - g).ker) <| by
-- Porting note: not needed in mathlib3
change NormedAddGroupHom V W at f g
ext v
have : v.1 ∈ (f - g).ker := v.2
simpa only [NormedAddGroupHom.incl_apply, Pi.zero_apply, coe_comp, NormedAddGroupHom.coe_zero,
NormedAddGroupHom.mem_ker, NormedAddGroupHom.coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply,
sub_eq_zero] using this
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.fork SemiNormedGroupCat.fork
instance hasLimit_parallelPair {V W : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f g : V ⟶ W) :
HasLimit (parallelPair f g) where
exists_limit :=
Nonempty.intro
{ cone := fork f g
isLimit :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _
(fun c =>
NormedAddGroupHom.ker.lift (Fork.ι c) _ <|
show NormedAddGroupHom.compHom (f - g) c.ι = 0 by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_sub, AddMonoidHom.sub_apply, sub_eq_zero]; exact c.condition)
(fun c => NormedAddGroupHom.ker.incl_comp_lift _ _ _) fun c g h => by
-- Porting note: the `simp_rw` was was `rw [← h]` but motive is not type correct in mathlib4
ext x; dsimp; simp_rw [← h]; rfl}
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.has_limit_parallel_pair SemiNormedGroupCat.hasLimit_parallelPair
instance : Limits.HasEqualizers.{u, u + 1} SemiNormedGroupCat :=
@hasEqualizers_of_hasLimit_parallelPair SemiNormedGroupCat _ fun {_ _ f g} =>
SemiNormedGroupCat.hasLimit_parallelPair f g
end EqualizersAndKernels
section Cokernel
-- PROJECT: can we reuse the work to construct cokernels in `SemiNormedGroupCat₁` here?
-- I don't see a way to do this that is less work than just repeating the relevant parts.
/-- Auxiliary definition for `HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat`. -/
noncomputable
def cokernelCocone {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Cofork f 0 :=
@Cofork.ofπ _ _ _ _ _ _ (SemiNormedGroupCat.of (Y ⧸ NormedAddGroupHom.range f)) f.range.normedMk
(by
ext a
simp only [comp_apply, Limits.zero_comp]
-- Porting note: `simp` not firing on the below
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [comp_apply, NormedAddGroupHom.zero_apply]
-- Porting note: Lean 3 didn't need this instance
letI : SeminormedAddCommGroup ((forget SemiNormedGroupCat).obj Y) :=
(inferInstance : SeminormedAddCommGroup Y)
-- Porting note: again simp doesn't seem to be firing in the below line
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← NormedAddGroupHom.mem_ker, f.range.ker_normedMk, f.mem_range]
-- This used to be `simp only [exists_apply_eq_apply]` before leanprover/lean4#2644
convert exists_apply_eq_apply f a)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.cokernel_cocone SemiNormedGroupCat.cokernelCocone
/-- Auxiliary definition for `HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat`. -/
noncomputable
def cokernelLift {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (s : CokernelCofork f) :
(cokernelCocone f).pt ⟶ s.pt :=
NormedAddGroupHom.lift _ s.π
(by
rintro _ ⟨b, rfl⟩
change (f ≫ s.π) b = 0
simp
-- This used to be the end of the proof before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [zero_apply])
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.cokernel_lift SemiNormedGroupCat.cokernelLift
/-- Auxiliary definition for `HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat`. -/
noncomputable
def isColimitCokernelCocone {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsColimit (cokernelCocone f) :=
isColimitAux _ (cokernelLift f)
(fun s => by
ext
apply NormedAddGroupHom.lift_mk f.range
rintro _ ⟨b, rfl⟩
change (f ≫ s.π) b = 0
simp
-- This used to be the end of the proof before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [zero_apply])
fun s m w => NormedAddGroupHom.lift_unique f.range _ _ _ w
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.is_colimit_cokernel_cocone SemiNormedGroupCat.isColimitCokernelCocone
instance : HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat.{u} where
has_colimit f :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := cokernelCocone f
isColimit := isColimitCokernelCocone f }
-- Sanity check
example : HasCokernels SemiNormedGroupCat := by infer_instance
section ExplicitCokernel
/-- An explicit choice of cokernel, which has good properties with respect to the norm. -/
noncomputable
def explicitCokernel {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u} :=
(cokernelCocone f).pt
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.explicit_cokernel SemiNormedGroupCat.explicitCokernel
/-- Descend to the explicit cokernel. -/
noncomputable
def explicitCokernelDesc {X Y Z : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
explicitCokernel f ⟶ Z :=
(isColimitCokernelCocone f).desc (Cofork.ofπ g (by simp [w]))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.explicit_cokernel_desc SemiNormedGroupCat.explicitCokernelDesc
/-- The projection from `Y` to the explicit cokernel of `X ⟶ Y`. -/
noncomputable
def explicitCokernelπ {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Y ⟶ explicitCokernel f :=
(cokernelCocone f).ι.app WalkingParallelPair.one
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.explicit_cokernel_π SemiNormedGroupCat.explicitCokernelπ
theorem explicitCokernelπ_surjective {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y} :
Function.Surjective (explicitCokernelπ f) :=
surjective_quot_mk _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align SemiNormedGroup.explicit_cokernel_π_surjective SemiNormedGroupCat.explicitCokernelπ_surjective
@[simp, reassoc]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/SemiNormedGroupCat/Kernels.lean | 242 | 245 | theorem comp_explicitCokernelπ {X Y : SemiNormedGroupCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ explicitCokernelπ f = 0 := by |
convert (cokernelCocone f).w WalkingParallelPairHom.left
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import algebra.algebra.bilinear from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"657df4339ae6ceada048c8a2980fb10e393143ec"
/-!
# Facts about algebras involving bilinear maps and tensor products
We move a few basic statements about algebras out of `Algebra.Algebra.Basic`,
in order to avoid importing `LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap` and
`LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct` unnecessarily.
-/
open TensorProduct Module
namespace LinearMap
section NonUnitalNonAssoc
variable (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
[SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- The multiplication in a non-unital non-associative algebra is a bilinear map.
A weaker version of this for semirings exists as `AddMonoidHom.mul`. -/
def mul : A →ₗ[R] A →ₗ[R] A :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (· * ·) add_mul smul_mul_assoc mul_add mul_smul_comm
#align linear_map.mul LinearMap.mul
/-- The multiplication map on a non-unital algebra, as an `R`-linear map from `A ⊗[R] A` to `A`. -/
noncomputable def mul' : A ⊗[R] A →ₗ[R] A :=
TensorProduct.lift (mul R A)
#align linear_map.mul' LinearMap.mul'
variable {A}
/-- The multiplication on the left in a non-unital algebra is a linear map. -/
def mulLeft (a : A) : A →ₗ[R] A :=
mul R A a
#align linear_map.mul_left LinearMap.mulLeft
/-- The multiplication on the right in an algebra is a linear map. -/
def mulRight (a : A) : A →ₗ[R] A :=
(mul R A).flip a
#align linear_map.mul_right LinearMap.mulRight
/-- Simultaneous multiplication on the left and right is a linear map. -/
def mulLeftRight (ab : A × A) : A →ₗ[R] A :=
(mulRight R ab.snd).comp (mulLeft R ab.fst)
#align linear_map.mul_left_right LinearMap.mulLeftRight
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_toAddMonoidHom (a : A) : (mulLeft R a : A →+ A) = AddMonoidHom.mulLeft a :=
rfl
#align linear_map.mul_left_to_add_monoid_hom LinearMap.mulLeft_toAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_toAddMonoidHom (a : A) : (mulRight R a : A →+ A) = AddMonoidHom.mulRight a :=
rfl
#align linear_map.mul_right_to_add_monoid_hom LinearMap.mulRight_toAddMonoidHom
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply' (a b : A) : mul R A a b = a * b :=
rfl
#align linear_map.mul_apply' LinearMap.mul_apply'
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_apply (a b : A) : mulLeft R a b = a * b :=
rfl
#align linear_map.mul_left_apply LinearMap.mulLeft_apply
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_apply (a b : A) : mulRight R a b = b * a :=
rfl
#align linear_map.mul_right_apply LinearMap.mulRight_apply
@[simp]
theorem mulLeftRight_apply (a b x : A) : mulLeftRight R (a, b) x = a * x * b :=
rfl
#align linear_map.mul_left_right_apply LinearMap.mulLeftRight_apply
@[simp]
theorem mul'_apply {a b : A} : mul' R A (a ⊗ₜ b) = a * b :=
rfl
#align linear_map.mul'_apply LinearMap.mul'_apply
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_zero_eq_zero : mulLeft R (0 : A) = 0 :=
(mul R A).map_zero
#align linear_map.mul_left_zero_eq_zero LinearMap.mulLeft_zero_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_zero_eq_zero : mulRight R (0 : A) = 0 :=
(mul R A).flip.map_zero
#align linear_map.mul_right_zero_eq_zero LinearMap.mulRight_zero_eq_zero
end NonUnitalNonAssoc
section NonUnital
variable (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
[IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- The multiplication in a non-unital algebra is a bilinear map.
A weaker version of this for non-unital non-associative algebras exists as `LinearMap.mul`. -/
def _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.lmul : A →ₙₐ[R] End R A :=
{ mul R A with
map_mul' := by
intro a b
ext c
exact mul_assoc a b c
map_zero' := by
ext a
exact zero_mul a }
#align non_unital_alg_hom.lmul NonUnitalAlgHom.lmul
variable {R A}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_lmul_eq_mul : ⇑(NonUnitalAlgHom.lmul R A) = mul R A :=
rfl
#align non_unital_alg_hom.coe_lmul_eq_mul NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_lmul_eq_mul
theorem commute_mulLeft_right (a b : A) : Commute (mulLeft R a) (mulRight R b) := by
ext c
exact (mul_assoc a c b).symm
#align linear_map.commute_mul_left_right LinearMap.commute_mulLeft_right
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_mul (a b : A) : mulLeft R (a * b) = (mulLeft R a).comp (mulLeft R b) := by
ext
simp only [mulLeft_apply, comp_apply, mul_assoc]
#align linear_map.mul_left_mul LinearMap.mulLeft_mul
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_mul (a b : A) : mulRight R (a * b) = (mulRight R b).comp (mulRight R a) := by
ext
simp only [mulRight_apply, comp_apply, mul_assoc]
#align linear_map.mul_right_mul LinearMap.mulRight_mul
end NonUnital
section Semiring
variable (R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {R A B} in
/-- A `LinearMap` preserves multiplication if pre- and post- composition with `LinearMap.mul` are
equivalent. By converting the statement into an equality of `LinearMap`s, this lemma allows various
specialized `ext` lemmas about `→ₗ[R]` to then be applied.
This is the `LinearMap` version of `AddMonoidHom.map_mul_iff`. -/
theorem map_mul_iff (f : A →ₗ[R] B) :
(∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) ↔
(LinearMap.mul R A).compr₂ f = (LinearMap.mul R B ∘ₗ f).compl₂ f :=
Iff.symm LinearMap.ext_iff₂
/-- The multiplication in an algebra is an algebra homomorphism into the endomorphisms on
the algebra.
A weaker version of this for non-unital algebras exists as `NonUnitalAlgHom.mul`. -/
def _root_.Algebra.lmul : A →ₐ[R] End R A :=
{ LinearMap.mul R A with
map_one' := by
ext a
exact one_mul a
map_mul' := by
intro a b
ext c
exact mul_assoc a b c
map_zero' := by
ext a
exact zero_mul a
commutes' := by
intro r
ext a
exact (Algebra.smul_def r a).symm }
#align algebra.lmul Algebra.lmul
variable {R A}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Algebra.coe_lmul_eq_mul : ⇑(Algebra.lmul R A) = mul R A :=
rfl
#align algebra.coe_lmul_eq_mul Algebra.coe_lmul_eq_mul
theorem _root_.Algebra.lmul_injective : Function.Injective (Algebra.lmul R A) :=
fun a₁ a₂ h ↦ by simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun h 1
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Bilinear.lean | 200 | 203 | theorem _root_.Algebra.lmul_isUnit_iff {x : A} :
IsUnit (Algebra.lmul R A x) ↔ IsUnit x := by |
rw [Module.End_isUnit_iff, Iff.comm]
exact IsUnit.isUnit_iff_mulLeft_bijective
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Restrict
/-!
# Classes of measures
We introduce the following typeclasses for measures:
* `IsProbabilityMeasure μ`: `μ univ = 1`;
* `IsFiniteMeasure μ`: `μ univ < ∞`;
* `SigmaFinite μ`: there exists a countable collection of sets that cover `univ`
where `μ` is finite;
* `SFinite μ`: the measure `μ` can be written as a countable sum of finite measures;
* `IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ` : `∀ x, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, μ s < ∞`;
* `NoAtoms μ` : `∀ x, μ {x} = 0`; possibly should be redefined as
`∀ s, 0 < μ s → ∃ t ⊆ s, 0 < μ t ∧ μ t < μ s`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter Function MeasurableSpace ENNReal
variable {α β δ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] {μ ν ν₁ ν₂: Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
section IsFiniteMeasure
/-- A measure `μ` is called finite if `μ univ < ∞`. -/
class IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
measure_univ_lt_top : μ univ < ∞
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure.measure_univ_lt_top MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure.measure_univ_lt_top
theorem not_isFiniteMeasure_iff : ¬IsFiniteMeasure μ ↔ μ Set.univ = ∞ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => fun h' => h'.measure_univ_lt_top.ne h⟩
by_contra h'
exact h ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr h'⟩
#align measure_theory.not_is_finite_measure_iff MeasureTheory.not_isFiniteMeasure_iff
instance Restrict.isFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure α) [hs : Fact (μ s < ∞)] :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨by simpa using hs.elim⟩
#align measure_theory.restrict.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.Restrict.isFiniteMeasure
theorem measure_lt_top (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) : μ s < ∞ :=
(measure_mono (subset_univ s)).trans_lt IsFiniteMeasure.measure_univ_lt_top
#align measure_theory.measure_lt_top MeasureTheory.measure_lt_top
instance isFiniteMeasureRestrict (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) [h : IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨by simpa using measure_lt_top μ s⟩
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_restrict MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureRestrict
theorem measure_ne_top (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) : μ s ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top μ s)
#align measure_theory.measure_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_ne_top
theorem measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ s ≤ μ t + ε) : μ tᶜ ≤ μ sᶜ + ε := by
rw [measure_compl ht (measure_ne_top μ _), measure_compl hs (measure_ne_top μ _),
tsub_le_iff_right]
calc
μ univ = μ univ - μ s + μ s := (tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| measure_mono s.subset_univ).symm
_ ≤ μ univ - μ s + (μ t + ε) := add_le_add_left h _
_ = _ := by rw [add_right_comm, add_assoc]
#align measure_theory.measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add
theorem measure_compl_le_add_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ sᶜ ≤ μ tᶜ + ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε :=
⟨fun h => compl_compl s ▸ compl_compl t ▸ measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add hs.compl ht.compl h,
measure_compl_le_add_of_le_add ht hs⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_compl_le_add_iff MeasureTheory.measure_compl_le_add_iff
/-- The measure of the whole space with respect to a finite measure, considered as `ℝ≥0`. -/
def measureUnivNNReal (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0 :=
(μ univ).toNNReal
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal
@[simp]
theorem coe_measureUnivNNReal (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
↑(measureUnivNNReal μ) = μ univ :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_ne_top μ univ)
#align measure_theory.coe_measure_univ_nnreal MeasureTheory.coe_measureUnivNNReal
instance isFiniteMeasureZero : IsFiniteMeasure (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_zero MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero
instance (priority := 50) isFiniteMeasureOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : IsFiniteMeasure μ := by
rw [eq_zero_of_isEmpty μ]
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureOfIsEmpty
@[simp]
theorem measureUnivNNReal_zero : measureUnivNNReal (0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal_zero MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal_zero
instance isFiniteMeasureAdd [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] : IsFiniteMeasure (μ + ν) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by
rw [Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.add_lt_top]
exact ⟨measure_lt_top _ _, measure_lt_top _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_add MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureAdd
instance isFiniteMeasureSMulNNReal [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {r : ℝ≥0} : IsFiniteMeasure (r • μ) where
measure_univ_lt_top := ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (measure_ne_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_smul_nnreal MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulNNReal
instance IsFiniteMeasure.average : IsFiniteMeasure ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by
rw [smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
exact ENNReal.div_self_le_one.trans_lt ENNReal.one_lt_top
instance isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0] [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {r : R} : IsFiniteMeasure (r • μ) := by
rw [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r μ]
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_smul_of_nnreal_tower MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower
theorem isFiniteMeasure_of_le (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h : ν ≤ μ) : IsFiniteMeasure ν :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top := (h Set.univ).trans_lt (measure_lt_top _ _) }
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_of_le MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasure_of_le
@[instance]
theorem Measure.isFiniteMeasure_map {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(f : α → β) : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.map f) := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· constructor
rw [map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf MeasurableSet.univ]
exact measure_lt_top μ _
· rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable hf]
exact MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero
#align measure_theory.measure.is_finite_measure_map MeasureTheory.Measure.isFiniteMeasure_map
@[simp]
theorem measureUnivNNReal_eq_zero [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : measureUnivNNReal μ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, ← coe_measureUnivNNReal]
norm_cast
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal_eq_zero
theorem measureUnivNNReal_pos [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : 0 < measureUnivNNReal μ := by
contrapose! hμ
simpa [measureUnivNNReal_eq_zero, Nat.le_zero] using hμ
#align measure_theory.measure_univ_nnreal_pos MeasureTheory.measureUnivNNReal_pos
/-- `le_of_add_le_add_left` is normally applicable to `OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid`,
but it holds for measures with the additional assumption that μ is finite. -/
theorem Measure.le_of_add_le_add_left [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (A2 : μ + ν₁ ≤ μ + ν₂) : ν₁ ≤ ν₂ :=
fun S => ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_left (MeasureTheory.measure_ne_top μ S) (A2 S)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_of_add_le_add_left MeasureTheory.Measure.le_of_add_le_add_left
theorem summable_measure_toReal [hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i : ℕ, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
Summable fun x => (μ (f x)).toReal := by
apply ENNReal.summable_toReal
rw [← MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion hf₂ hf₁]
exact ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.summable_measure_to_real MeasureTheory.summable_measure_toReal
theorem ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
s =ᵐ[μ] univ ↔ μ s = μ univ := by
refine ⟨measure_congr, fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, -, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq
exact
ht₂.symm.trans
(ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (subset_univ t) (Eq.le ((measure_congr ht₂).trans h).symm) ht₁
(measure_ne_top μ univ))
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq MeasureTheory.ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq
theorem ae_iff_measure_eq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {p : α → Prop}
(hp : NullMeasurableSet { a | p a } μ) : (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | p a } = μ univ := by
rw [← ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq hp, eventuallyEq_univ, eventually_iff]
#align measure_theory.ae_iff_measure_eq MeasureTheory.ae_iff_measure_eq
theorem ae_mem_iff_measure_eq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
(∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ s) ↔ μ s = μ univ :=
ae_iff_measure_eq hs
#align measure_theory.ae_mem_iff_measure_eq MeasureTheory.ae_mem_iff_measure_eq
lemma tendsto_measure_biUnion_Ici_zero_of_pairwise_disjoint
{X : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] {μ : Measure X} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{Es : ℕ → Set X} (Es_mble : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (Es i))
(Es_disj : Pairwise fun n m ↦ Disjoint (Es n) (Es m)) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ fun n ↦ ⋃ i ≥ n, Es i) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have decr : Antitone fun n ↦ ⋃ i ≥ n, Es i :=
fun n m hnm ↦ biUnion_mono (fun _ hi ↦ le_trans hnm hi) (fun _ _ ↦ subset_rfl)
have nothing : ⋂ n, ⋃ i ≥ n, Es i = ∅ := by
apply subset_antisymm _ (empty_subset _)
intro x hx
simp only [ge_iff_le, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
obtain ⟨j, _, x_in_Es_j⟩ := hx 0
obtain ⟨k, k_gt_j, x_in_Es_k⟩ := hx (j+1)
have oops := (Es_disj (Nat.ne_of_lt k_gt_j)).ne_of_mem x_in_Es_j x_in_Es_k
contradiction
have key :=
tendsto_measure_iInter (μ := μ) (fun n ↦ by measurability) decr ⟨0, measure_ne_top _ _⟩
simp only [ge_iff_le, nothing, measure_empty] at key
convert key
open scoped symmDiff
theorem abs_toReal_measure_sub_le_measure_symmDiff'
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht' : μ t ≠ ∞) :
|(μ s).toReal - (μ t).toReal| ≤ (μ (s ∆ t)).toReal := by
have hst : μ (s \ t) ≠ ∞ := (measure_lt_top_of_subset diff_subset hs').ne
have hts : μ (t \ s) ≠ ∞ := (measure_lt_top_of_subset diff_subset ht').ne
suffices (μ s).toReal - (μ t).toReal = (μ (s \ t)).toReal - (μ (t \ s)).toReal by
rw [this, measure_symmDiff_eq hs ht, ENNReal.toReal_add hst hts]
convert abs_sub (μ (s \ t)).toReal (μ (t \ s)).toReal <;> simp
rw [measure_diff' s ht ht', measure_diff' t hs hs',
ENNReal.toReal_sub_of_le measure_le_measure_union_right (measure_union_ne_top hs' ht'),
ENNReal.toReal_sub_of_le measure_le_measure_union_right (measure_union_ne_top ht' hs'),
union_comm t s]
abel
theorem abs_toReal_measure_sub_le_measure_symmDiff [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
|(μ s).toReal - (μ t).toReal| ≤ (μ (s ∆ t)).toReal :=
abs_toReal_measure_sub_le_measure_symmDiff' hs ht (measure_ne_top μ s) (measure_ne_top μ t)
end IsFiniteMeasure
section IsProbabilityMeasure
/-- A measure `μ` is called a probability measure if `μ univ = 1`. -/
class IsProbabilityMeasure (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
measure_univ : μ univ = 1
#align measure_theory.is_probability_measure MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure
#align measure_theory.is_probability_measure.measure_univ MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure.measure_univ
export MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure (measure_univ)
attribute [simp] IsProbabilityMeasure.measure_univ
lemma isProbabilityMeasure_iff : IsProbabilityMeasure μ ↔ μ univ = 1 :=
⟨fun _ ↦ measure_univ, IsProbabilityMeasure.mk⟩
instance (priority := 100) IsProbabilityMeasure.toIsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure α)
[IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : IsFiniteMeasure μ :=
⟨by simp only [measure_univ, ENNReal.one_lt_top]⟩
#align measure_theory.is_probability_measure.to_is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure.toIsFiniteMeasure
theorem IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ ≠ 0 :=
mt measure_univ_eq_zero.2 <| by simp [measure_univ]
#align measure_theory.is_probability_measure.ne_zero MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero
instance (priority := 100) IsProbabilityMeasure.neZero (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
NeZero μ := ⟨IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ⟩
-- Porting note: no longer an `instance` because `inferInstance` can find it now
theorem IsProbabilityMeasure.ae_neBot [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : NeBot (ae μ) := inferInstance
#align measure_theory.is_probability_measure.ae_ne_bot MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure.ae_neBot
theorem prob_add_prob_compl [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = 1 :=
(measure_add_measure_compl h).trans measure_univ
#align measure_theory.prob_add_prob_compl MeasureTheory.prob_add_prob_compl
theorem prob_le_one [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ s ≤ 1 :=
(measure_mono <| Set.subset_univ _).trans_eq measure_univ
#align measure_theory.prob_le_one MeasureTheory.prob_le_one
-- Porting note: made an `instance`, using `NeZero`
instance isProbabilityMeasureSMul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [NeZero μ] :
IsProbabilityMeasure ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) :=
⟨ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel (NeZero.ne (μ univ)) (measure_ne_top _ _)⟩
#align measure_theory.is_probability_measure_smul MeasureTheory.isProbabilityMeasureSMulₓ
variable [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α}
theorem isProbabilityMeasure_map {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (map f μ) :=
⟨by simp [map_apply_of_aemeasurable, hf]⟩
#align measure_theory.is_probability_measure_map MeasureTheory.isProbabilityMeasure_map
@[simp]
theorem one_le_prob_iff : 1 ≤ μ s ↔ μ s = 1 :=
⟨fun h => le_antisymm prob_le_one h, fun h => h ▸ le_refl _⟩
#align measure_theory.one_le_prob_iff MeasureTheory.one_le_prob_iff
/-- Note that this is not quite as useful as it looks because the measure takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`.
Thus the subtraction appearing is the truncated subtraction of `ℝ≥0∞`, rather than the
better-behaved subtraction of `ℝ`. -/
lemma prob_compl_eq_one_sub₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ sᶜ = 1 - μ s := by
rw [measure_compl₀ h (measure_ne_top _ _), measure_univ]
/-- Note that this is not quite as useful as it looks because the measure takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`.
Thus the subtraction appearing is the truncated subtraction of `ℝ≥0∞`, rather than the
better-behaved subtraction of `ℝ`. -/
theorem prob_compl_eq_one_sub (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ sᶜ = 1 - μ s :=
prob_compl_eq_one_sub₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.prob_compl_eq_one_sub MeasureTheory.prob_compl_eq_one_sub
lemma prob_compl_lt_one_sub_of_lt_prob {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hμs : p < μ s) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
μ sᶜ < 1 - p := by
rw [prob_compl_eq_one_sub s_mble]
apply ENNReal.sub_lt_of_sub_lt prob_le_one (Or.inl one_ne_top)
convert hμs
exact ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel one_ne_top (lt_of_lt_of_le hμs prob_le_one).le
lemma prob_compl_le_one_sub_of_le_prob {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hμs : p ≤ μ s) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
μ sᶜ ≤ 1 - p := by
simpa [prob_compl_eq_one_sub s_mble] using tsub_le_tsub_left hμs 1
@[simp] lemma prob_compl_eq_zero_iff₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ sᶜ = 0 ↔ μ s = 1 := by
rw [prob_compl_eq_one_sub₀ hs, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_prob_iff]
@[simp] lemma prob_compl_eq_zero_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ sᶜ = 0 ↔ μ s = 1 :=
prob_compl_eq_zero_iff₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.prob_compl_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.prob_compl_eq_zero_iff
@[simp] lemma prob_compl_eq_one_iff₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ sᶜ = 1 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← prob_compl_eq_zero_iff₀ hs.compl, compl_compl]
@[simp] lemma prob_compl_eq_one_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ sᶜ = 1 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
prob_compl_eq_one_iff₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.prob_compl_eq_one_iff MeasureTheory.prob_compl_eq_one_iff
lemma mem_ae_iff_prob_eq_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : s ∈ ae μ ↔ μ s = 1 :=
mem_ae_iff.trans <| prob_compl_eq_zero_iff₀ hs
lemma mem_ae_iff_prob_eq_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : s ∈ ae μ ↔ μ s = 1 :=
mem_ae_iff.trans <| prob_compl_eq_zero_iff hs
lemma ae_iff_prob_eq_one (hp : Measurable p) : (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ {a | p a} = 1 :=
mem_ae_iff_prob_eq_one hp.setOf
lemma isProbabilityMeasure_comap (hf : Injective f) (hf' : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ range f)
(hf'' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (μ.comap f) where
measure_univ := by
rw [comap_apply _ hf hf'' _ MeasurableSet.univ,
← mem_ae_iff_prob_eq_one (hf'' _ MeasurableSet.univ)]
simpa
protected lemma _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.isProbabilityMeasure_comap (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
(hf' : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ range f) : IsProbabilityMeasure (μ.comap f) :=
isProbabilityMeasure_comap hf.injective hf' hf.measurableSet_image'
instance isProbabilityMeasure_map_up :
IsProbabilityMeasure (μ.map ULift.up) := isProbabilityMeasure_map measurable_up.aemeasurable
instance isProbabilityMeasure_comap_down : IsProbabilityMeasure (μ.comap ULift.down) :=
MeasurableEquiv.ulift.measurableEmbedding.isProbabilityMeasure_comap <| ae_of_all _ <| by
simp [Function.Surjective.range_eq <| EquivLike.surjective _]
end IsProbabilityMeasure
section NoAtoms
/-- Measure `μ` *has no atoms* if the measure of each singleton is zero.
NB: Wikipedia assumes that for any measurable set `s` with positive `μ`-measure,
there exists a measurable `t ⊆ s` such that `0 < μ t < μ s`. While this implies `μ {x} = 0`,
the converse is not true. -/
class NoAtoms {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
measure_singleton : ∀ x, μ {x} = 0
#align measure_theory.has_no_atoms MeasureTheory.NoAtoms
#align measure_theory.has_no_atoms.measure_singleton MeasureTheory.NoAtoms.measure_singleton
export MeasureTheory.NoAtoms (measure_singleton)
attribute [simp] measure_singleton
variable [NoAtoms μ]
theorem _root_.Set.Subsingleton.measure_zero (hs : s.Subsingleton) (μ : Measure α) [NoAtoms μ] :
μ s = 0 :=
hs.induction_on (p := fun s => μ s = 0) measure_empty measure_singleton
#align set.subsingleton.measure_zero Set.Subsingleton.measure_zero
theorem Measure.restrict_singleton' {a : α} : μ.restrict {a} = 0 := by
simp only [measure_singleton, Measure.restrict_eq_zero]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_singleton' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_singleton'
instance Measure.restrict.instNoAtoms (s : Set α) : NoAtoms (μ.restrict s) := by
refine ⟨fun x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, hxt, ht1, ht2⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (measure_singleton x : μ {x} = 0)
apply measure_mono_null hxt
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht1]
apply measure_mono_null inter_subset_left ht2
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict.has_no_atoms MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict.instNoAtoms
theorem _root_.Set.Countable.measure_zero (h : s.Countable) (μ : Measure α) [NoAtoms μ] :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, measure_biUnion_null_iff h]
simp
#align set.countable.measure_zero Set.Countable.measure_zero
theorem _root_.Set.Countable.ae_not_mem (h : s.Countable) (μ : Measure α) [NoAtoms μ] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s := by
simpa only [ae_iff, Classical.not_not] using h.measure_zero μ
#align set.countable.ae_not_mem Set.Countable.ae_not_mem
lemma _root_.Set.Countable.measure_restrict_compl (h : s.Countable) (μ : Measure α) [NoAtoms μ] :
μ.restrict sᶜ = μ :=
restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem <| h.ae_not_mem μ
@[simp]
lemma restrict_compl_singleton (a : α) : μ.restrict ({a}ᶜ) = μ :=
(countable_singleton _).measure_restrict_compl μ
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.measure_zero (h : s.Finite) (μ : Measure α) [NoAtoms μ] : μ s = 0 :=
h.countable.measure_zero μ
#align set.finite.measure_zero Set.Finite.measure_zero
theorem _root_.Finset.measure_zero (s : Finset α) (μ : Measure α) [NoAtoms μ] : μ s = 0 :=
s.finite_toSet.measure_zero μ
#align finset.measure_zero Finset.measure_zero
theorem insert_ae_eq_self (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s :=
union_ae_eq_right.2 <| measure_mono_null diff_subset (measure_singleton _)
#align measure_theory.insert_ae_eq_self MeasureTheory.insert_ae_eq_self
section
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Iio_ae_eq_Iic : Iio a =ᵐ[μ] Iic a :=
Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (measure_singleton a)
#align measure_theory.Iio_ae_eq_Iic MeasureTheory.Iio_ae_eq_Iic
theorem Ioi_ae_eq_Ici : Ioi a =ᵐ[μ] Ici a :=
Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' (measure_singleton a)
#align measure_theory.Ioi_ae_eq_Ici MeasureTheory.Ioi_ae_eq_Ici
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' (measure_singleton b)
#align measure_theory.Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc MeasureTheory.Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc
theorem Ioc_ae_eq_Icc : Ioc a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
Ioc_ae_eq_Icc' (measure_singleton a)
#align measure_theory.Ioc_ae_eq_Icc MeasureTheory.Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ico : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ico a b :=
Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' (measure_singleton a)
#align measure_theory.Ioo_ae_eq_Ico MeasureTheory.Ioo_ae_eq_Ico
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Icc : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
Ioo_ae_eq_Icc' (measure_singleton a) (measure_singleton b)
#align measure_theory.Ioo_ae_eq_Icc MeasureTheory.Ioo_ae_eq_Icc
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Icc : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
Ico_ae_eq_Icc' (measure_singleton b)
#align measure_theory.Ico_ae_eq_Icc MeasureTheory.Ico_ae_eq_Icc
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Ioc : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
Ico_ae_eq_Ioc' (measure_singleton a) (measure_singleton b)
#align measure_theory.Ico_ae_eq_Ioc MeasureTheory.Ico_ae_eq_Ioc
theorem restrict_Iio_eq_restrict_Iic : μ.restrict (Iio a) = μ.restrict (Iic a) :=
restrict_congr_set Iio_ae_eq_Iic
theorem restrict_Ioi_eq_restrict_Ici : μ.restrict (Ioi a) = μ.restrict (Ici a) :=
restrict_congr_set Ioi_ae_eq_Ici
theorem restrict_Ioo_eq_restrict_Ioc : μ.restrict (Ioo a b) = μ.restrict (Ioc a b) :=
restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc
theorem restrict_Ioc_eq_restrict_Icc : μ.restrict (Ioc a b) = μ.restrict (Icc a b) :=
restrict_congr_set Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
theorem restrict_Ioo_eq_restrict_Ico : μ.restrict (Ioo a b) = μ.restrict (Ico a b) :=
restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico
theorem restrict_Ioo_eq_restrict_Icc : μ.restrict (Ioo a b) = μ.restrict (Icc a b) :=
restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc
theorem restrict_Ico_eq_restrict_Icc : μ.restrict (Ico a b) = μ.restrict (Icc a b) :=
restrict_congr_set Ico_ae_eq_Icc
theorem restrict_Ico_eq_restrict_Ioc : μ.restrict (Ico a b) = μ.restrict (Ioc a b) :=
restrict_congr_set Ico_ae_eq_Ioc
end
open Interval
theorem uIoc_ae_eq_interval [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} : Ι a b =ᵐ[μ] [[a, b]] :=
Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
#align measure_theory.uIoc_ae_eq_interval MeasureTheory.uIoc_ae_eq_interval
end NoAtoms
theorem ite_ae_eq_of_measure_zero {γ} (f : α → γ) (g : α → γ) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hs_zero : μ s = 0) :
(fun x => ite (x ∈ s) (f x) (g x)) =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have h_ss : sᶜ ⊆ { a : α | ite (a ∈ s) (f a) (g a) = g a } := fun x hx => by
simp [(Set.mem_compl_iff _ _).mp hx]
refine measure_mono_null ?_ hs_zero
conv_rhs => rw [← compl_compl s]
rwa [Set.compl_subset_compl]
#align measure_theory.ite_ae_eq_of_measure_zero MeasureTheory.ite_ae_eq_of_measure_zero
theorem ite_ae_eq_of_measure_compl_zero {γ} (f : α → γ) (g : α → γ)
(s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs_zero : μ sᶜ = 0) :
(fun x => ite (x ∈ s) (f x) (g x)) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [← mem_ae_iff] at hs_zero
filter_upwards [hs_zero]
intros
split_ifs
rfl
#align measure_theory.ite_ae_eq_of_measure_compl_zero MeasureTheory.ite_ae_eq_of_measure_compl_zero
namespace Measure
/-- A measure is called finite at filter `f` if it is finite at some set `s ∈ f`.
Equivalently, it is eventually finite at `s` in `f.small_sets`. -/
def FiniteAtFilter {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : Filter α) : Prop :=
∃ s ∈ f, μ s < ∞
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_at_filter MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteAtFilter
theorem finiteAtFilter_of_finite {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(f : Filter α) : μ.FiniteAtFilter f :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, measure_lt_top μ univ⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_at_filter_of_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.finiteAtFilter_of_finite
theorem FiniteAtFilter.exists_mem_basis {f : Filter α} (hμ : FiniteAtFilter μ f) {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set α} (hf : f.HasBasis p s) : ∃ i, p i ∧ μ (s i) < ∞ :=
(hf.exists_iff fun {_s _t} hst ht => (measure_mono hst).trans_lt ht).1 hμ
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_at_filter.exists_mem_basis MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteAtFilter.exists_mem_basis
theorem finiteAtBot {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ.FiniteAtFilter ⊥ :=
⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp only [measure_empty, zero_lt_top]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_at_bot MeasureTheory.Measure.finiteAtBot
/-- `μ` has finite spanning sets in `C` if there is a countable sequence of sets in `C` that have
finite measures. This structure is a type, which is useful if we want to record extra properties
about the sets, such as that they are monotone.
`SigmaFinite` is defined in terms of this: `μ` is σ-finite if there exists a sequence of
finite spanning sets in the collection of all measurable sets. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure FiniteSpanningSetsIn {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (C : Set (Set α)) where
protected set : ℕ → Set α
protected set_mem : ∀ i, set i ∈ C
protected finite : ∀ i, μ (set i) < ∞
protected spanning : ⋃ i, set i = univ
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.set MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.set
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.set_mem MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.set_mem
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.finite MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.finite
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.spanning MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.spanning
end Measure
open Measure
section SFinite
/-- A measure is called s-finite if it is a countable sum of finite measures. -/
class SFinite (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
out' : ∃ m : ℕ → Measure α, (∀ n, IsFiniteMeasure (m n)) ∧ μ = Measure.sum m
/-- A sequence of finite measures such that `μ = sum (sFiniteSeq μ)` (see `sum_sFiniteSeq`). -/
noncomputable
def sFiniteSeq (μ : Measure α) [h : SFinite μ] : ℕ → Measure α := h.1.choose
instance isFiniteMeasure_sFiniteSeq [h : SFinite μ] (n : ℕ) : IsFiniteMeasure (sFiniteSeq μ n) :=
h.1.choose_spec.1 n
lemma sum_sFiniteSeq (μ : Measure α) [h : SFinite μ] : sum (sFiniteSeq μ) = μ :=
h.1.choose_spec.2.symm
instance : SFinite (0 : Measure α) := ⟨fun _ ↦ 0, inferInstance, by rw [Measure.sum_zero]⟩
@[simp]
lemma sFiniteSeq_zero (n : ℕ) : sFiniteSeq (0 : Measure α) n = 0 := by
ext s hs
have h : ∑' n, sFiniteSeq (0 : Measure α) n s = 0 := by
simp [← Measure.sum_apply _ hs, sum_sFiniteSeq]
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at h
exact h n
/-- A countable sum of finite measures is s-finite.
This lemma is superseeded by the instance below. -/
lemma sfinite_sum_of_countable [Countable ι]
(m : ι → Measure α) [∀ n, IsFiniteMeasure (m n)] : SFinite (Measure.sum m) := by
classical
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ : ∃ f : ι → ℕ, Function.Injective f := Countable.exists_injective_nat ι
refine ⟨_, fun n ↦ ?_, (sum_extend_zero hf m).symm⟩
rcases em (n ∈ range f) with ⟨i, rfl⟩ | hn
· rw [hf.extend_apply]
infer_instance
· rw [Function.extend_apply' _ _ _ hn, Pi.zero_apply]
infer_instance
instance [Countable ι] (m : ι → Measure α) [∀ n, SFinite (m n)] : SFinite (Measure.sum m) := by
change SFinite (Measure.sum (fun i ↦ m i))
simp_rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq (m _), Measure.sum_sum]
apply sfinite_sum_of_countable
instance [SFinite μ] [SFinite ν] : SFinite (μ + ν) := by
refine ⟨fun n ↦ sFiniteSeq μ n + sFiniteSeq ν n, inferInstance, ?_⟩
ext s hs
simp only [Measure.add_apply, sum_apply _ hs]
rw [tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable, ← sum_apply _ hs, ← sum_apply _ hs,
sum_sFiniteSeq, sum_sFiniteSeq]
instance [SFinite μ] (s : Set α) : SFinite (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨fun n ↦ (sFiniteSeq μ n).restrict s, fun n ↦ inferInstance,
by rw [← restrict_sum_of_countable, sum_sFiniteSeq]⟩
end SFinite
/-- A measure `μ` is called σ-finite if there is a countable collection of sets
`{ A i | i ∈ ℕ }` such that `μ (A i) < ∞` and `⋃ i, A i = s`. -/
class SigmaFinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
out' : Nonempty (μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn univ)
#align measure_theory.sigma_finite MeasureTheory.SigmaFinite
#align measure_theory.sigma_finite.out' MeasureTheory.SigmaFinite.out'
theorem sigmaFinite_iff : SigmaFinite μ ↔ Nonempty (μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn univ) :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.sigma_finite_iff MeasureTheory.sigmaFinite_iff
theorem SigmaFinite.out (h : SigmaFinite μ) : Nonempty (μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn univ) :=
h.1
#align measure_theory.sigma_finite.out MeasureTheory.SigmaFinite.out
/-- If `μ` is σ-finite it has finite spanning sets in the collection of all measurable sets. -/
def Measure.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn (μ : Measure α) [h : SigmaFinite μ] :
μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn { s | MeasurableSet s } where
set n := toMeasurable μ (h.out.some.set n)
set_mem n := measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
finite n := by
rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact h.out.some.finite n
spanning := eq_univ_of_subset (iUnion_mono fun n => subset_toMeasurable _ _) h.out.some.spanning
#align measure_theory.measure.to_finite_spanning_sets_in MeasureTheory.Measure.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn
/-- A noncomputable way to get a monotone collection of sets that span `univ` and have finite
measure using `Classical.choose`. This definition satisfies monotonicity in addition to all other
properties in `SigmaFinite`. -/
def spanningSets (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (i : ℕ) : Set α :=
Accumulate μ.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn.set i
#align measure_theory.spanning_sets MeasureTheory.spanningSets
theorem monotone_spanningSets (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : Monotone (spanningSets μ) :=
monotone_accumulate
#align measure_theory.monotone_spanning_sets MeasureTheory.monotone_spanningSets
theorem measurable_spanningSets (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (i : ℕ) :
MeasurableSet (spanningSets μ i) :=
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun j => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => μ.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn.set_mem j
#align measure_theory.measurable_spanning_sets MeasureTheory.measurable_spanningSets
theorem measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (i : ℕ) :
μ (spanningSets μ i) < ∞ :=
measure_biUnion_lt_top (finite_le_nat i) fun j _ => (μ.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn.finite j).ne
#align measure_theory.measure_spanning_sets_lt_top MeasureTheory.measure_spanningSets_lt_top
theorem iUnion_spanningSets (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : ⋃ i : ℕ, spanningSets μ i = univ := by
simp_rw [spanningSets, iUnion_accumulate, μ.toFiniteSpanningSetsIn.spanning]
#align measure_theory.Union_spanning_sets MeasureTheory.iUnion_spanningSets
theorem isCountablySpanning_spanningSets (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] :
IsCountablySpanning (range (spanningSets μ)) :=
⟨spanningSets μ, mem_range_self, iUnion_spanningSets μ⟩
#align measure_theory.is_countably_spanning_spanning_sets MeasureTheory.isCountablySpanning_spanningSets
open scoped Classical in
/-- `spanningSetsIndex μ x` is the least `n : ℕ` such that `x ∈ spanningSets μ n`. -/
noncomputable def spanningSetsIndex (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (x : α) : ℕ :=
Nat.find <| iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_spanningSets μ) x
#align measure_theory.spanning_sets_index MeasureTheory.spanningSetsIndex
open scoped Classical in
theorem measurable_spanningSetsIndex (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] :
Measurable (spanningSetsIndex μ) :=
measurable_find _ <| measurable_spanningSets μ
#align measure_theory.measurable_spanning_sets_index MeasureTheory.measurable_spanningSetsIndex
open scoped Classical in
theorem preimage_spanningSetsIndex_singleton (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (n : ℕ) :
spanningSetsIndex μ ⁻¹' {n} = disjointed (spanningSets μ) n :=
preimage_find_eq_disjointed _ _ _
#align measure_theory.preimage_spanning_sets_index_singleton MeasureTheory.preimage_spanningSetsIndex_singleton
theorem spanningSetsIndex_eq_iff (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
spanningSetsIndex μ x = n ↔ x ∈ disjointed (spanningSets μ) n := by
convert Set.ext_iff.1 (preimage_spanningSetsIndex_singleton μ n) x
#align measure_theory.spanning_sets_index_eq_iff MeasureTheory.spanningSetsIndex_eq_iff
theorem mem_disjointed_spanningSetsIndex (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (x : α) :
x ∈ disjointed (spanningSets μ) (spanningSetsIndex μ x) :=
(spanningSetsIndex_eq_iff μ).1 rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_disjointed_spanning_sets_index MeasureTheory.mem_disjointed_spanningSetsIndex
theorem mem_spanningSetsIndex (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (x : α) :
x ∈ spanningSets μ (spanningSetsIndex μ x) :=
disjointed_subset _ _ (mem_disjointed_spanningSetsIndex μ x)
#align measure_theory.mem_spanning_sets_index MeasureTheory.mem_spanningSetsIndex
theorem mem_spanningSets_of_index_le (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (x : α) {n : ℕ}
(hn : spanningSetsIndex μ x ≤ n) : x ∈ spanningSets μ n :=
monotone_spanningSets μ hn (mem_spanningSetsIndex μ x)
#align measure_theory.mem_spanning_sets_of_index_le MeasureTheory.mem_spanningSets_of_index_le
theorem eventually_mem_spanningSets (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ n in atTop, x ∈ spanningSets μ n :=
eventually_atTop.2 ⟨spanningSetsIndex μ x, fun _ => mem_spanningSets_of_index_le μ x⟩
#align measure_theory.eventually_mem_spanning_sets MeasureTheory.eventually_mem_spanningSets
theorem sum_restrict_disjointed_spanningSets (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] :
sum (fun n ↦ μ.restrict (disjointed (spanningSets μ) n)) = μ := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion (disjoint_disjointed _)
(MeasurableSet.disjointed (measurable_spanningSets _)),
iUnion_disjointed, iUnion_spanningSets, restrict_univ]
instance (priority := 100) [SigmaFinite μ] : SFinite μ := by
have : ∀ n, Fact (μ (disjointed (spanningSets μ) n) < ∞) :=
fun n ↦ ⟨(measure_mono (disjointed_subset _ _)).trans_lt (measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ n)⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun n ↦ μ.restrict (disjointed (spanningSets μ) n), fun n ↦ by infer_instance,
(sum_restrict_disjointed_spanningSets μ).symm⟩⟩
namespace Measure
/-- A set in a σ-finite space has zero measure if and only if its intersection with
all members of the countable family of finite measure spanning sets has zero measure. -/
theorem forall_measure_inter_spanningSets_eq_zero [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[SigmaFinite μ] (s : Set α) : (∀ n, μ (s ∩ spanningSets μ n) = 0) ↔ μ s = 0 := by
nth_rw 2 [show s = ⋃ n, s ∩ spanningSets μ n by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets, inter_univ] ]
rw [measure_iUnion_null_iff]
#align measure_theory.measure.forall_measure_inter_spanning_sets_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.forall_measure_inter_spanningSets_eq_zero
/-- A set in a σ-finite space has positive measure if and only if its intersection with
some member of the countable family of finite measure spanning sets has positive measure. -/
theorem exists_measure_inter_spanningSets_pos [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [SigmaFinite μ]
(s : Set α) : (∃ n, 0 < μ (s ∩ spanningSets μ n)) ↔ 0 < μ s := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_exists, not_lt, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact forall_measure_inter_spanningSets_eq_zero s
#align measure_theory.measure.exists_measure_inter_spanning_sets_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.exists_measure_inter_spanningSets_pos
/-- If the union of a.e.-disjoint null-measurable sets has finite measure, then there are only
finitely many members of the union whose measure exceeds any given positive number. -/
theorem finite_const_le_meas_of_disjoint_iUnion₀ {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) {As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) (Union_As_finite : μ (⋃ i, As i) ≠ ∞) :
Set.Finite { i : ι | ε ≤ μ (As i) } :=
ENNReal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top Union_As_finite (tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ As_mble As_disj))
ε_pos.ne'
/-- If the union of disjoint measurable sets has finite measure, then there are only
finitely many members of the union whose measure exceeds any given positive number. -/
theorem finite_const_le_meas_of_disjoint_iUnion {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) {As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) (Union_As_finite : μ (⋃ i, As i) ≠ ∞) :
Set.Finite { i : ι | ε ≤ μ (As i) } :=
finite_const_le_meas_of_disjoint_iUnion₀ μ ε_pos (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h)) Union_As_finite
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_const_le_meas_of_disjoint_Union MeasureTheory.Measure.finite_const_le_meas_of_disjoint_iUnion
/-- If all elements of an infinite set have measure uniformly separated from zero,
then the set has infinite measure. -/
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.meas_eq_top [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
{s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) (h' : ∃ ε, ε ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ε ≤ μ {x}) : μ s = ∞ := top_unique <|
let ⟨ε, hne, hε⟩ := h'; have := hs.to_subtype
calc
∞ = ∑' _ : s, ε := (ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero hne).symm
_ ≤ ∑' x : s, μ {x.1} := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x ↦ hε x x.2
_ ≤ μ (⋃ x : s, {x.1}) := tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint _
(fun _ ↦ MeasurableSet.singleton _) fun x y hne ↦ by simpa [Subtype.val_inj]
_ = μ s := by simp
/-- If the union of a.e.-disjoint null-measurable sets has finite measure, then there are only
countably many members of the union whose measure is positive. -/
theorem countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_of_meas_iUnion_ne_top₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) (Union_As_finite : μ (⋃ i, As i) ≠ ∞) :
Set.Countable { i : ι | 0 < μ (As i) } := by
set posmeas := { i : ι | 0 < μ (As i) } with posmeas_def
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto' (zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < 1) with
⟨as, _, as_mem, as_lim⟩
set fairmeas := fun n : ℕ => { i : ι | as n ≤ μ (As i) }
have countable_union : posmeas = ⋃ n, fairmeas n := by
have fairmeas_eq : ∀ n, fairmeas n = (fun i => μ (As i)) ⁻¹' Ici (as n) := fun n => by
simp only [fairmeas]
rfl
simpa only [fairmeas_eq, posmeas_def, ← preimage_iUnion,
iUnion_Ici_eq_Ioi_of_lt_of_tendsto (0 : ℝ≥0∞) (fun n => (as_mem n).1) as_lim]
rw [countable_union]
refine countable_iUnion fun n => Finite.countable ?_
exact finite_const_le_meas_of_disjoint_iUnion₀ μ (as_mem n).1 As_mble As_disj Union_As_finite
/-- If the union of disjoint measurable sets has finite measure, then there are only
countably many members of the union whose measure is positive. -/
theorem countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_of_meas_iUnion_ne_top {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) (Union_As_finite : μ (⋃ i, As i) ≠ ∞) :
Set.Countable { i : ι | 0 < μ (As i) } :=
countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_of_meas_iUnion_ne_top₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
((fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))) Union_As_finite
#align measure_theory.measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_of_meas_Union_ne_top MeasureTheory.Measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_of_meas_iUnion_ne_top
/-- In an s-finite space, among disjoint null-measurable sets, only countably many can have positive
measure. -/
theorem countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion₀ {ι : Type*} { _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SFinite μ] {As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) :
Set.Countable { i : ι | 0 < μ (As i) } := by
rw [← sum_sFiniteSeq μ] at As_disj As_mble ⊢
have obs : { i : ι | 0 < sum (sFiniteSeq μ) (As i) }
⊆ ⋃ n, { i : ι | 0 < sFiniteSeq μ n (As i) } := by
intro i hi
by_contra con
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at *
rw [sum_apply₀] at hi
· simp_rw [con] at hi
simp at hi
· exact As_mble i
apply Countable.mono obs
refine countable_iUnion fun n ↦ ?_
apply countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_of_meas_iUnion_ne_top₀
· exact fun i ↦ (As_mble i).mono (le_sum _ _)
· exact fun i j hij ↦ AEDisjoint.of_le (As_disj hij) (le_sum _ _)
· exact measure_ne_top _ (⋃ i, As i)
/-- In an s-finite space, among disjoint measurable sets, only countably many can have positive
measure. -/
theorem countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SFinite μ] {As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : Set.Countable { i : ι | 0 < μ (As i) } :=
countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion₀ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
((fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h)))
#align measure_theory.measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_Union MeasureTheory.Measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion
theorem countable_meas_level_set_pos₀ {α β : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SFinite μ] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] {g : α → β}
(g_mble : NullMeasurable g μ) : Set.Countable { t : β | 0 < μ { a : α | g a = t } } := by
have level_sets_disjoint : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun t : β => { a : α | g a = t }) :=
fun s t hst => Disjoint.preimage g (disjoint_singleton.mpr hst)
exact Measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion₀
(fun b => g_mble (‹MeasurableSingletonClass β›.measurableSet_singleton b))
((fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (level_sets_disjoint h)))
theorem countable_meas_level_set_pos {α β : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SFinite μ] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] {g : α → β}
(g_mble : Measurable g) : Set.Countable { t : β | 0 < μ { a : α | g a = t } } :=
countable_meas_level_set_pos₀ g_mble.nullMeasurable
#align measure_theory.measure.countable_meas_level_set_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.countable_meas_level_set_pos
/-- If a measure `μ` is the sum of a countable family `mₙ`, and a set `t` has finite measure for
each `mₙ`, then its measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sum {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set α}
{m : ℕ → Measure α} (hv : ∀ n, m n t ≠ ∞) (hμ : μ = sum m) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
-- we show that there is a measurable superset of `t` satisfying the conclusion for any
-- measurable set `s`. It is built for each measure `mₙ` using `toMeasurable`
-- (which is well behaved for finite measure sets thanks to `measure_toMeasurable_inter`), and
-- then taking the intersection over `n`.
have A : ∃ t', t' ⊇ t ∧ MeasurableSet t' ∧ ∀ u, MeasurableSet u → μ (t' ∩ u) = μ (t ∩ u) := by
let w n := toMeasurable (m n) t
have T : t ⊆ ⋂ n, w n := subset_iInter (fun i ↦ subset_toMeasurable (m i) t)
have M : MeasurableSet (⋂ n, w n) :=
MeasurableSet.iInter (fun i ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable (m i) t)
refine ⟨⋂ n, w n, T, M, fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by gcongr)
rw [hμ, sum_apply _ (M.inter hu)]
apply le_trans _ (le_sum_apply _ _)
apply ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum (fun i ↦ ?_)
calc
m i ((⋂ n, w n) ∩ u) ≤ m i (w i ∩ u) := by gcongr; apply iInter_subset
_ = m i (t ∩ u) := measure_toMeasurable_inter hu (hv i)
-- thanks to the definition of `toMeasurable`, the previous property will also be shared
-- by `toMeasurable μ t`, which is enough to conclude the proof.
rw [toMeasurable]
split_ifs with ht
· apply measure_congr
exact ae_eq_set_inter ht.choose_spec.2.2 (ae_eq_refl _)
· exact A.choose_spec.2.2 s hs
/-- If a set `t` is covered by a countable family of finite measure sets, then its measurable
superset `toMeasurable μ t` (which has the same measure as `t`) satisfies,
for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_cover {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set α}
{v : ℕ → Set α} (hv : t ⊆ ⋃ n, v n) (h'v : ∀ n, μ (t ∩ v n) ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
-- we show that there is a measurable superset of `t` satisfying the conclusion for any
-- measurable set `s`. It is built on each member of a spanning family using `toMeasurable`
-- (which is well behaved for finite measure sets thanks to `measure_toMeasurable_inter`), and
-- the desired property passes to the union.
have A : ∃ t', t' ⊇ t ∧ MeasurableSet t' ∧ ∀ u, MeasurableSet u → μ (t' ∩ u) = μ (t ∩ u) := by
let w n := toMeasurable μ (t ∩ v n)
have hw : ∀ n, μ (w n) < ∞ := by
intro n
simp_rw [w, measure_toMeasurable]
exact (h'v n).lt_top
set t' := ⋃ n, toMeasurable μ (t ∩ disjointed w n) with ht'
have tt' : t ⊆ t' :=
calc
t ⊆ ⋃ n, t ∩ disjointed w n := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_disjointed, inter_iUnion]
intro x hx
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hv hx) with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, ?_⟩
have : x ∈ t ∩ v n := ⟨hx, hn⟩
exact ⟨hx, subset_toMeasurable μ _ this⟩
_ ⊆ ⋃ n, toMeasurable μ (t ∩ disjointed w n) :=
iUnion_mono fun n => subset_toMeasurable _ _
refine ⟨t', tt', MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable μ _, fun u hu => ?_⟩
apply le_antisymm _ (by gcongr)
calc
μ (t' ∩ u) ≤ ∑' n, μ (toMeasurable μ (t ∩ disjointed w n) ∩ u) := by
rw [ht', iUnion_inter]
exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ∑' n, μ (t ∩ disjointed w n ∩ u) := by
congr 1
ext1 n
apply measure_toMeasurable_inter hu
apply ne_of_lt
calc
μ (t ∩ disjointed w n) ≤ μ (t ∩ w n) := by
gcongr
exact disjointed_le w n
_ ≤ μ (w n) := measure_mono inter_subset_right
_ < ∞ := hw n
_ = ∑' n, μ.restrict (t ∩ u) (disjointed w n) := by
congr 1
ext1 n
rw [restrict_apply, inter_comm t _, inter_assoc]
refine MeasurableSet.disjointed (fun n => ?_) n
exact measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
_ = μ.restrict (t ∩ u) (⋃ n, disjointed w n) := by
rw [measure_iUnion]
· exact disjoint_disjointed _
· intro i
refine MeasurableSet.disjointed (fun n => ?_) i
exact measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
_ ≤ μ.restrict (t ∩ u) univ := measure_mono (subset_univ _)
_ = μ (t ∩ u) := by rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
-- thanks to the definition of `toMeasurable`, the previous property will also be shared
-- by `toMeasurable μ t`, which is enough to conclude the proof.
rw [toMeasurable]
split_ifs with ht
· apply measure_congr
exact ae_eq_set_inter ht.choose_spec.2.2 (ae_eq_refl _)
· exact A.choose_spec.2.2 s hs
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_inter_of_cover MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_cover
theorem restrict_toMeasurable_of_cover {s : Set α} {v : ℕ → Set α} (hv : s ⊆ ⋃ n, v n)
(h'v : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ v n) ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_comm t, measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_cover ht hv h'v]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_to_measurable_of_cover MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_toMeasurable_of_cover
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s)`.
This only holds when `μ` is s-finite -- for example for σ-finite measures. For a version without
this assumption (but requiring that `t` has finite measure), see `measure_toMeasurable_inter`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite [SFinite μ] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(t : Set α) : μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sum hs (fun _ ↦ measure_ne_top _ t) (sum_sFiniteSeq μ).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_inter_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite
@[simp]
theorem restrict_toMeasurable_of_sFinite [SFinite μ] (s : Set α) :
μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, inter_comm t, measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite ht,
restrict_apply ht, inter_comm t]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_to_measurable_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_toMeasurable_of_sFinite
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `iSup_restrict_spanningSets`. -/
theorem iSup_restrict_spanningSets_of_measurableSet [SigmaFinite μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
⨆ i, μ.restrict (spanningSets μ i) s = μ s :=
calc
⨆ i, μ.restrict (spanningSets μ i) s = μ.restrict (⋃ i, spanningSets μ i) s :=
(restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup (monotone_spanningSets μ).directed_le hs).symm
_ = μ s := by rw [iUnion_spanningSets, restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure.supr_restrict_spanning_sets MeasureTheory.Measure.iSup_restrict_spanningSets_of_measurableSet
theorem iSup_restrict_spanningSets [SigmaFinite μ] (s : Set α) :
⨆ i, μ.restrict (spanningSets μ i) s = μ s := by
rw [← measure_toMeasurable s,
← iSup_restrict_spanningSets_of_measurableSet (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)]
simp_rw [restrict_apply' (measurable_spanningSets μ _), Set.inter_comm s,
← restrict_apply (measurable_spanningSets μ _), ← restrict_toMeasurable_of_sFinite s,
restrict_apply (measurable_spanningSets μ _), Set.inter_comm _ (toMeasurable μ s)]
/-- In a σ-finite space, any measurable set of measure `> r` contains a measurable subset of
finite measure `> r`. -/
theorem exists_subset_measure_lt_top [SigmaFinite μ] {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h's : r < μ s) : ∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ r < μ t ∧ μ t < ∞ := by
rw [← iSup_restrict_spanningSets,
@lt_iSup_iff _ _ _ r fun i : ℕ => μ.restrict (spanningSets μ i) s] at h's
rcases h's with ⟨n, hn⟩
simp only [restrict_apply hs] at hn
refine
⟨s ∩ spanningSets μ n, hs.inter (measurable_spanningSets _ _), inter_subset_left, hn, ?_⟩
exact (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt (measure_spanningSets_lt_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.measure.exists_subset_measure_lt_top MeasureTheory.Measure.exists_subset_measure_lt_top
namespace FiniteSpanningSetsIn
variable {C D : Set (Set α)}
/-- If `μ` has finite spanning sets in `C` and `C ∩ {s | μ s < ∞} ⊆ D` then `μ` has finite spanning
sets in `D`. -/
protected def mono' (h : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) (hC : C ∩ { s | μ s < ∞ } ⊆ D) :
μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn D :=
⟨h.set, fun i => hC ⟨h.set_mem i, h.finite i⟩, h.finite, h.spanning⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.mono' MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.mono'
/-- If `μ` has finite spanning sets in `C` and `C ⊆ D` then `μ` has finite spanning sets in `D`. -/
protected def mono (h : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) (hC : C ⊆ D) : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn D :=
h.mono' fun _s hs => hC hs.1
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.mono MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.mono
/-- If `μ` has finite spanning sets in the collection of measurable sets `C`, then `μ` is σ-finite.
-/
protected theorem sigmaFinite (h : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) : SigmaFinite μ :=
⟨⟨h.mono <| subset_univ C⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.sigma_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.sigmaFinite
/-- An extensionality for measures. It is `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` formulated in terms of
`FiniteSpanningSetsIn`. -/
protected theorem ext {ν : Measure α} {C : Set (Set α)} (hA : ‹_› = generateFrom C)
(hC : IsPiSystem C) (h : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν :=
ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion C _ hA hC h.spanning h.set_mem (fun i => (h.finite i).ne) h_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.ext MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ext
protected theorem isCountablySpanning (h : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) : IsCountablySpanning C :=
⟨h.set, h.set_mem, h.spanning⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.is_countably_spanning MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.isCountablySpanning
end FiniteSpanningSetsIn
theorem sigmaFinite_of_countable {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hμ : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s < ∞)
(hU : ⋃₀ S = univ) : SigmaFinite μ := by
obtain ⟨s, hμ, hs⟩ : ∃ s : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, μ (s n) < ∞) ∧ ⋃ n, s n = univ :=
(@exists_seq_cover_iff_countable _ (fun x => μ x < ∞) ⟨∅, by simp⟩).2 ⟨S, hc, hμ, hU⟩
exact ⟨⟨⟨fun n => s n, fun _ => trivial, hμ, hs⟩⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.sigma_finite_of_countable MeasureTheory.Measure.sigmaFinite_of_countable
/-- Given measures `μ`, `ν` where `ν ≤ μ`, `FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ofLe` provides the induced
`FiniteSpanningSet` with respect to `ν` from a `FiniteSpanningSet` with respect to `μ`. -/
def FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ofLE (h : ν ≤ μ) {C : Set (Set α)} (S : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C) :
ν.FiniteSpanningSetsIn C where
set := S.set
set_mem := S.set_mem
finite n := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_iff'.1 h _) (S.finite n)
spanning := S.spanning
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.of_le MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ofLE
theorem sigmaFinite_of_le (μ : Measure α) [hs : SigmaFinite μ] (h : ν ≤ μ) : SigmaFinite ν :=
⟨hs.out.map <| FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ofLE h⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.sigma_finite_of_le MeasureTheory.Measure.sigmaFinite_of_le
@[simp] lemma add_right_inj (μ ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] :
μ + ν₁ = μ + ν₂ ↔ ν₁ = ν₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by rw [h]⟩
rw [ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ (iUnion_spanningSets μ)]
intro i
ext s hs
rw [← ENNReal.add_right_inj (measure_mono s.inter_subset_right |>.trans_lt <|
measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ i).ne]
simp only [ext_iff', coe_add, Pi.add_apply] at h
simp [hs, h]
@[simp] lemma add_left_inj (μ ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] :
ν₁ + μ = ν₂ + μ ↔ ν₁ = ν₂ := by rw [add_comm _ μ, add_comm _ μ, μ.add_right_inj]
end Measure
/-- Every finite measure is σ-finite. -/
instance (priority := 100) IsFiniteMeasure.toSigmaFinite {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] : SigmaFinite μ :=
⟨⟨⟨fun _ => univ, fun _ => trivial, fun _ => measure_lt_top μ _, iUnion_const _⟩⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure.to_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure.toSigmaFinite
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Typeclasses.lean | 1,082 | 1,101 | theorem sigmaFinite_bot_iff (μ : @Measure α ⊥) : SigmaFinite μ ↔ IsFiniteMeasure μ := by |
refine
⟨fun h => ⟨?_⟩, fun h => by
haveI := h
infer_instance⟩
haveI : SigmaFinite μ := h
let s := spanningSets μ
have hs_univ : ⋃ i, s i = Set.univ := iUnion_spanningSets μ
have hs_meas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[⊥] (s i) := measurable_spanningSets μ
simp_rw [MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_bot_iff] at hs_meas
by_cases h_univ_empty : (Set.univ : Set α) = ∅
· rw [h_univ_empty, measure_empty]
exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top.lt_top
obtain ⟨i, hsi⟩ : ∃ i, s i = Set.univ := by
by_contra! h_not_univ
have h_empty : ∀ i, s i = ∅ := by simpa [h_not_univ] using hs_meas
simp only [h_empty, iUnion_empty] at hs_univ
exact h_univ_empty hs_univ.symm
rw [← hsi]
exact measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ i
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Init.Algebra.Classes
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Ordering.Basic
#align_import init.data.ordering.lemmas from "leanprover-community/lean"@"4bd314f7bd5e0c9e813fc201f1279a23f13f9f1d"
/-!
# Some `Ordering` lemmas
-/
universe u
namespace Ordering
@[simp]
theorem ite_eq_lt_distrib (c : Prop) [Decidable c] (a b : Ordering) :
((if c then a else b) = Ordering.lt) = if c then a = Ordering.lt else b = Ordering.lt := by
by_cases c <;> simp [*]
#align ordering.ite_eq_lt_distrib Ordering.ite_eq_lt_distrib
@[simp]
theorem ite_eq_eq_distrib (c : Prop) [Decidable c] (a b : Ordering) :
((if c then a else b) = Ordering.eq) = if c then a = Ordering.eq else b = Ordering.eq := by
by_cases c <;> simp [*]
#align ordering.ite_eq_eq_distrib Ordering.ite_eq_eq_distrib
@[simp]
theorem ite_eq_gt_distrib (c : Prop) [Decidable c] (a b : Ordering) :
((if c then a else b) = Ordering.gt) = if c then a = Ordering.gt else b = Ordering.gt := by
by_cases c <;> simp [*]
#align ordering.ite_eq_gt_distrib Ordering.ite_eq_gt_distrib
end Ordering
section
variable {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt]
attribute [local simp] cmpUsing
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Init/Data/Ordering/Lemmas.lean | 46 | 47 | theorem cmpUsing_eq_lt (a b : α) : (cmpUsing lt a b = Ordering.lt) = lt a b := by |
simp only [cmpUsing, Ordering.ite_eq_lt_distrib, ite_self, if_false_right, and_true]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.rel from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"706d88f2b8fdfeb0b22796433d7a6c1a010af9f2"
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODOs
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop -- deriving CompleteLattice, Inhabited
#align rel Rel
-- Porting note: `deriving` above doesn't work.
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
-- Porting note: required for later theorems.
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
#align rel.inv Rel.inv
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.inv_def Rel.inv_def
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
#align rel.inv_inv Rel.inv_inv
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
#align rel.dom Rel.dom
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
#align rel.dom_mono Rel.dom_mono
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
#align rel.codom Rel.codom
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.codom_inv Rel.codom_inv
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.dom_inv Rel.dom_inv
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
#align rel.comp Rel.comp
-- Porting note: the original `∘` syntax can't be overloaded here, lean considers it ambiguous.
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
#align rel.comp_assoc Rel.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
#align rel.comp_right_id Rel.comp_right_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
#align rel.comp_left_id Rel.comp_left_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 131 | 133 | theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by |
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
#align_import linear_algebra.vandermonde from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Vandermonde matrix
This file defines the `vandermonde` matrix and gives its determinant.
## Main definitions
- `vandermonde v`: a square matrix with the `i, j`th entry equal to `v i ^ j`.
## Main results
- `det_vandermonde`: `det (vandermonde v)` is the product of `v i - v j`, where
`(i, j)` ranges over the unordered pairs.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
open Equiv Finset
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
/-- `vandermonde v` is the square matrix with `i`th row equal to `1, v i, v i ^ 2, v i ^ 3, ...`.
-/
def vandermonde {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n → R) : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) R := fun i j => v i ^ (j : ℕ)
#align matrix.vandermonde Matrix.vandermonde
@[simp]
theorem vandermonde_apply {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n → R) (i j) : vandermonde v i j = v i ^ (j : ℕ) :=
rfl
#align matrix.vandermonde_apply Matrix.vandermonde_apply
@[simp]
theorem vandermonde_cons {n : ℕ} (v0 : R) (v : Fin n → R) :
vandermonde (Fin.cons v0 v : Fin n.succ → R) =
Fin.cons (fun (j : Fin n.succ) => v0 ^ (j : ℕ)) fun i => Fin.cons 1
fun j => v i * vandermonde v i j := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases (by simp) (fun i => ?_) i
refine Fin.cases (by simp) (fun j => ?_) j
simp [pow_succ']
#align matrix.vandermonde_cons Matrix.vandermonde_cons
theorem vandermonde_succ {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → R) :
vandermonde v =
Fin.cons (fun (j : Fin n.succ) => v 0 ^ (j : ℕ)) fun i =>
Fin.cons 1 fun j => v i.succ * vandermonde (Fin.tail v) i j := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Fin.cons_self_tail v, vandermonde_cons]
rfl
#align matrix.vandermonde_succ Matrix.vandermonde_succ
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Vandermonde.lean | 67 | 69 | theorem vandermonde_mul_vandermonde_transpose {n : ℕ} (v w : Fin n → R) (i j) :
(vandermonde v * (vandermonde w)ᵀ) i j = ∑ k : Fin n, (v i * w j) ^ (k : ℕ) := by |
simp only [vandermonde_apply, Matrix.mul_apply, Matrix.transpose_apply, mul_pow]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.GaussianIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
/-!
# Fourier transform of the Gaussian
We prove that the Fourier transform of the Gaussian function is another Gaussian:
* `integral_cexp_quadratic`: general formula for `∫ (x : ℝ), exp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d)`
* `fourierIntegral_gaussian`: for all complex `b` and `t` with `0 < re b`, we have
`∫ x:ℝ, exp (I * t * x) * exp (-b * x^2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2) * exp (-t ^ 2 / (4 * b))`.
* `fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi`: a variant with `b` and `t` scaled to give a more symmetric
statement, and formulated in terms of the Fourier transform operator `𝓕`.
We also give versions of these formulas in finite-dimensional inner product spaces, see
`integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add` and `fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace`.
-/
/-!
## Fourier integral of Gaussian functions
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
open scoped Real Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp abs_of_nonneg sq_abs
noncomputable section
namespace GaussianFourier
variable {b : ℂ}
/-- The integral of the Gaussian function over the vertical edges of a rectangle
with vertices at `(±T, 0)` and `(±T, c)`. -/
def verticalIntegral (b : ℂ) (c T : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ y : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, I * (cexp (-b * (T + y * I) ^ 2) - cexp (-b * (T - y * I) ^ 2))
#align gaussian_fourier.vertical_integral GaussianFourier.verticalIntegral
/-- Explicit formula for the norm of the Gaussian function along the vertical
edges. -/
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I (b : ℂ) (c T : ℝ) :
‖cexp (-b * (T + c * I) ^ 2)‖ = exp (-(b.re * T ^ 2 - 2 * b.im * c * T - b.re * c ^ 2)) := by
rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_exp, neg_mul, neg_re, ← re_add_im b]
simp only [sq, re_add_im, mul_re, mul_im, add_re, add_im, ofReal_re, ofReal_im, I_re, I_im]
ring_nf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gaussian_fourier.norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I GaussianFourier.norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I' (hb : b.re ≠ 0) (c T : ℝ) :
‖cexp (-b * (T + c * I) ^ 2)‖ =
exp (-(b.re * (T - b.im * c / b.re) ^ 2 - c ^ 2 * (b.im ^ 2 / b.re + b.re))) := by
have :
b.re * T ^ 2 - 2 * b.im * c * T - b.re * c ^ 2 =
b.re * (T - b.im * c / b.re) ^ 2 - c ^ 2 * (b.im ^ 2 / b.re + b.re) := by
field_simp; ring
rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I, this]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gaussian_fourier.norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I' GaussianFourier.norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I'
theorem verticalIntegral_norm_le (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 ≤ T) :
‖verticalIntegral b c T‖ ≤
(2 : ℝ) * |c| * exp (-(b.re * T ^ 2 - (2 : ℝ) * |b.im| * |c| * T - b.re * c ^ 2)) := by
-- first get uniform bound for integrand
have vert_norm_bound :
∀ {T : ℝ},
0 ≤ T →
∀ {c y : ℝ},
|y| ≤ |c| →
‖cexp (-b * (T + y * I) ^ 2)‖ ≤
exp (-(b.re * T ^ 2 - (2 : ℝ) * |b.im| * |c| * T - b.re * c ^ 2)) := by
intro T hT c y hy
rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I b]
gcongr exp (- (_ - ?_ * _ - _ * ?_))
· (conv_lhs => rw [mul_assoc]); (conv_rhs => rw [mul_assoc])
gcongr _ * ?_
refine (le_abs_self _).trans ?_
rw [abs_mul]
gcongr
· rwa [sq_le_sq]
-- now main proof
apply (intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const _).trans
pick_goal 1
· rw [sub_zero]
conv_lhs => simp only [mul_comm _ |c|]
conv_rhs =>
conv =>
congr
rw [mul_comm]
rw [mul_assoc]
· intro y hy
have absy : |y| ≤ |c| := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 c with (h | h)
· rw [uIoc_of_le h] at hy
rw [abs_of_nonneg h, abs_of_pos hy.1]
exact hy.2
· rw [uIoc_of_lt h] at hy
rw [abs_of_neg h, abs_of_nonpos hy.2, neg_le_neg_iff]
exact hy.1.le
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_eq_abs, abs_I, one_mul, two_mul]
refine (norm_sub_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (vert_norm_bound hT absy) ?_)
rw [← abs_neg y] at absy
simpa only [neg_mul, ofReal_neg] using vert_norm_bound hT absy
#align gaussian_fourier.vertical_integral_norm_le GaussianFourier.verticalIntegral_norm_le
theorem tendsto_verticalIntegral (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) :
Tendsto (verticalIntegral b c) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
-- complete proof using squeeze theorem:
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
refine
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds ?_
(eventually_of_forall fun _ => norm_nonneg _)
((eventually_ge_atTop (0 : ℝ)).mp
(eventually_of_forall fun T hT => verticalIntegral_norm_le hb c hT))
rw [(by ring : 0 = 2 * |c| * 0)]
refine (tendsto_exp_atBot.comp (tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot.comp ?_)).const_mul _
apply tendsto_atTop_add_const_right
simp_rw [sq, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul]
refine Tendsto.atTop_mul_atTop (tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ ?_) tendsto_id
exact (tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos hb).mpr tendsto_id
#align gaussian_fourier.tendsto_vertical_integral GaussianFourier.tendsto_verticalIntegral
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => cexp (-b * (x + c * I) ^ 2) := by
refine
⟨(Complex.continuous_exp.comp
(continuous_const.mul
((continuous_ofReal.add continuous_const).pow 2))).aestronglyMeasurable,
?_⟩
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I' hb.ne', neg_sub _ (c ^ 2 * _),
sub_eq_add_neg _ (b.re * _), Real.exp_add]
suffices Integrable fun x : ℝ => exp (-(b.re * x ^ 2)) by
exact (Integrable.comp_sub_right this (b.im * c / b.re)).hasFiniteIntegral.const_mul _
simp_rw [← neg_mul]
apply integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq hb
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gaussian_fourier.integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I GaussianFourier.integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x + c * I) ^ 2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) := by
refine
tendsto_nhds_unique
(intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I hb c)
tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot tendsto_id)
?_
set I₁ := fun T => ∫ x : ℝ in -T..T, cexp (-b * (x + c * I) ^ 2) with HI₁
let I₂ := fun T : ℝ => ∫ x : ℝ in -T..T, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)
let I₄ := fun T : ℝ => ∫ y : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, cexp (-b * (T + y * I) ^ 2)
let I₅ := fun T : ℝ => ∫ y : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, cexp (-b * (-T + y * I) ^ 2)
have C : ∀ T : ℝ, I₂ T - I₁ T + I * I₄ T - I * I₅ T = 0 := by
intro T
have :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn (fun z => cexp (-b * z ^ 2)) (-T)
(T + c * I)
(by
refine Differentiable.differentiableOn (Differentiable.const_mul ?_ _).cexp
exact differentiable_pow 2)
simpa only [neg_im, ofReal_im, neg_zero, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero, neg_re,
ofReal_re, add_re, mul_re, I_re, mul_zero, I_im, tsub_zero, add_im, mul_im,
mul_one, zero_add, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, ofReal_neg] using this
simp_rw [id, ← HI₁]
have : I₁ = fun T : ℝ => I₂ T + verticalIntegral b c T := by
ext1 T
specialize C T
rw [sub_eq_zero] at C
unfold verticalIntegral
rw [integral_const_mul, intervalIntegral.integral_sub]
· simp_rw [(fun a b => by rw [sq]; ring_nf : ∀ a b : ℂ, (a - b * I) ^ 2 = (-a + b * I) ^ 2)]
change I₁ T = I₂ T + I * (I₄ T - I₅ T)
rw [mul_sub, ← C]
abel
all_goals apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable; continuity
rw [this, ← add_zero ((π / b : ℂ) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ)), ← integral_gaussian_complex hb]
refine Tendsto.add ?_ (tendsto_verticalIntegral hb c)
exact
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb) tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot
tendsto_id
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gaussian_fourier.integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I GaussianFourier.integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I
theorem _root_.integral_cexp_quadratic (hb : b.re < 0) (c d : ℂ) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d) = (π / -b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (d - c^2 / (4 * b)) := by
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
have h (x : ℝ) : cexp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d) =
cexp (- -b * (x + c / (2 * b)) ^ 2) * cexp (d - c ^ 2 / (4 * b)) := by
simp_rw [← Complex.exp_add]
congr 1
field_simp
ring_nf
simp_rw [h, integral_mul_right]
rw [← re_add_im (c / (2 * b))]
simp_rw [← add_assoc, ← ofReal_add]
rw [integral_add_right_eq_self fun a : ℝ ↦ cexp (- -b * (↑a + ↑(c / (2 * b)).im * I) ^ 2),
integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I ((neg_re b).symm ▸ (neg_pos.mpr hb))]
lemma _root_.integrable_cexp_quadratic' (hb : b.re < 0) (c d : ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (x : ℝ) ↦ cexp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d)) := by
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
by_contra H
simpa [hb', pi_ne_zero, Complex.exp_ne_zero, integral_undef H]
using integral_cexp_quadratic hb c d
lemma _root_.integrable_cexp_quadratic (hb : 0 < b.re) (c d : ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (x : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d)) := by
have : (-b).re < 0 := by simpa using hb
exact integrable_cexp_quadratic' this c d
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian (hb : 0 < b.re) (t : ℂ) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (I * t * x) * cexp (-b * x ^ 2) =
(π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-t ^ 2 / (4 * b)) := by
conv => enter [1, 2, x]; rw [← Complex.exp_add, add_comm, ← add_zero (-b * x ^ 2 + I * t * x)]
rw [integral_cexp_quadratic (show (-b).re < 0 by rwa [neg_re, neg_lt_zero]), neg_neg, zero_sub,
mul_neg, div_neg, neg_neg, mul_pow, I_sq, neg_one_mul, mul_comm]
#align fourier_transform_gaussian fourierIntegral_gaussian
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias _root_.fourier_transform_gaussian := fourierIntegral_gaussian
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi' (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) :
(𝓕 fun x : ℝ => cexp (-π * b * x ^ 2 + 2 * π * c * x)) = fun t : ℝ =>
1 / b ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π / b * (t + I * c) ^ 2) := by
haveI : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
have h : (-↑π * b).re < 0 := by
simpa only [neg_mul, neg_re, re_ofReal_mul, neg_lt_zero] using mul_pos pi_pos hb
ext1 t
simp_rw [fourierIntegral_real_eq_integral_exp_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← Complex.exp_add, ← add_assoc]
have (x : ℝ) : ↑(-2 * π * x * t) * I + -π * b * x ^ 2 + 2 * π * c * x =
-π * b * x ^ 2 + (-2 * π * I * t + 2 * π * c) * x + 0 := by push_cast; ring
simp_rw [this, integral_cexp_quadratic h, neg_mul, neg_neg]
congr 2
· rw [← div_div, div_self <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero, one_div, inv_cpow, ← one_div]
rw [Ne, arg_eq_pi_iff, not_and_or, not_lt]
exact Or.inl hb.le
· field_simp [ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero]
ring_nf
simp only [I_sq]
ring
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias _root_.fourier_transform_gaussian_pi' := _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi'
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi (hb : 0 < b.re) :
(𝓕 fun (x : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-π * b * x ^ 2)) =
fun t : ℝ ↦ 1 / b ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π / b * t ^ 2) := by
simpa only [mul_zero, zero_mul, add_zero] using fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi' hb 0
#align fourier_transform_gaussian_pi fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias root_.fourier_transform_gaussian_pi := _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi
section InnerProductSpace
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → ℂ}
(hb : ∀ i, 0 < (b i).re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (v : ι → ℝ) ↦ cexp (- ∑ i, b i * (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)) := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_neg_distrib, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, Complex.exp_sum, ← neg_mul]
apply Integrable.fintype_prod (f := fun i (v : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-b i * v^2 + c i * v)) (fun i ↦ ?_)
convert integrable_cexp_quadratic (hb i) (c i) 0 using 3 with x
simp only [add_zero]
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (v : ι → ℝ) ↦ cexp (- b * ∑ i, (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)) := by
simp_rw [neg_mul, Finset.mul_sum]
exact integrable_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add (fun _ ↦ hb) c
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι) :
Integrable (fun (v : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι) ↦ cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫)) := by
have := EuclideanSpace.volume_preserving_measurableEquiv ι
rw [← MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb this.symm (MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)]
simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_def]
convert integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add hb (fun i ↦ c * w i) using 3 with v
simp only [EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk, MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk,
EuclideanSpace.norm_eq, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, PiLp.inner_apply,
RCLike.inner_apply, conj_trivial, ofReal_sum, ofReal_mul, Finset.mul_sum, neg_mul,
Finset.sum_neg_distrib, mul_assoc, add_left_inj, neg_inj]
norm_cast
rw [sq_sqrt]
· simp [Finset.mul_sum]
· exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun i _hi ↦ by positivity)
/-- In a real inner product space, the complex exponential of minus the square of the norm plus
a scalar product is integrable. Useful when discussing the Fourier transform of a Gaussian. -/
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : V) :
Integrable (fun (v : V) ↦ cexp (-b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫)) := by
let e := (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ V).repr.symm
rw [← e.measurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb e.toHomeomorph.measurableEmbedding]
convert integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
hb c (e.symm w) with v
simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map,
LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_symm, conj_trivial, ofReal_sum,
ofReal_mul, LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_eq_flip]
theorem integral_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → ℂ}
(hb : ∀ i, 0 < (b i).re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
∫ v : ι → ℝ, cexp (- ∑ i, b i * (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)
= ∏ i, (π / b i) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (c i ^ 2 / (4 * b i)) := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_neg_distrib, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, Complex.exp_sum, ← neg_mul]
rw [integral_fintype_prod_eq_prod (f := fun i (v : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-b i * v ^ 2 + c i * v))]
congr with i
have : (-b i).re < 0 := by simpa using hb i
convert integral_cexp_quadratic this (c i) 0 using 1 <;> simp [div_neg]
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
∫ v : ι → ℝ, cexp (- b * ∑ i, (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)
= (π / b) ^ (Fintype.card ι / 2 : ℂ) * cexp ((∑ i, c i ^ 2) / (4 * b)) := by
simp_rw [neg_mul, Finset.mul_sum, integral_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add (fun _ ↦ hb) c]
simp only [one_div, Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const, ← cpow_nat_mul, ← Complex.exp_sum,
Fintype.card, Finset.sum_div]
rfl
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι) :
∫ v : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι, cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫) =
(π / b) ^ (Fintype.card ι / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (c ^ 2 * ‖w‖^2 / (4 * b)) := by
have := (EuclideanSpace.volume_preserving_measurableEquiv ι).symm
rw [← this.integral_comp (MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)]
simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_def]
convert integral_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add hb (fun i ↦ c * w i) using 5 with _x y
· simp only [EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk, MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk,
EuclideanSpace.norm_eq, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, neg_mul,
neg_inj, mul_eq_mul_left_iff]
norm_cast
left
rw [sq_sqrt]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun i _hi ↦ by positivity)
· simp [PiLp.inner_apply, EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv, Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc]
· simp only [EuclideanSpace.norm_eq, Real.norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, mul_pow, ← Finset.mul_sum]
congr
norm_cast
rw [sq_sqrt]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun i _hi ↦ by positivity)
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add
(hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : V) :
∫ v : V, cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫) =
(π / b) ^ (FiniteDimensional.finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (c ^ 2 * ‖w‖^2 / (4 * b)) := by
let e := (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ V).repr.symm
rw [← e.measurePreserving.integral_comp e.toHomeomorph.measurableEmbedding]
convert integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
hb c (e.symm w) <;> simp [LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_eq_flip]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/FourierTransform.lean | 356 | 358 | theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm (hb : 0 < b.re) :
∫ v : V, cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2) = (π / b) ^ (FiniteDimensional.finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) := by |
simpa using integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add hb 0 (0 : V)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
#align_import data.rat.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"550b58538991c8977703fdeb7c9d51a5aa27df11"
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
open Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
cases' e : a /. b with n d h c
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_ofNat] at this; simp [this]
#align rat.num_dvd Rat.num_dvd
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
cases' e : a /. b with n d h c
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
#align rat.denom_dvd Rat.den_dvd
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
#align rat.num_denom_mk Rat.num_den_mk
#noalign rat.mk_pnat_num
#noalign rat.mk_pnat_denom
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 62 | 68 | theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by |
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Option.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Computation
#align_import data.seq.seq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `Seq α` type representing possibly infinite lists (referred here as sequences).
It is encoded as an infinite stream of options such that if `f n = none`, then
`f m = none` for all `m ≥ n`.
-/
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
/-
coinductive seq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : seq α
| cons : α → seq α → seq α
-/
/-- A stream `s : Option α` is a sequence if `s.get n = none` implies `s.get (n + 1) = none`.
-/
def IsSeq {α : Type u} (s : Stream' (Option α)) : Prop :=
∀ {n : ℕ}, s n = none → s (n + 1) = none
#align stream.is_seq Stream'.IsSeq
/-- `Seq α` is the type of possibly infinite lists (referred here as sequences).
It is encoded as an infinite stream of options such that if `f n = none`, then
`f m = none` for all `m ≥ n`. -/
def Seq (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // f.IsSeq }
#align stream.seq Stream'.Seq
/-- `Seq1 α` is the type of nonempty sequences. -/
def Seq1 (α) :=
α × Seq α
#align stream.seq1 Stream'.Seq1
namespace Seq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- The empty sequence -/
def nil : Seq α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun {_} _ => rfl⟩
#align stream.seq.nil Stream'.Seq.nil
instance : Inhabited (Seq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
/-- Prepend an element to a sequence -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Seq α) : Seq α :=
⟨some a::s.1, by
rintro (n | _) h
· contradiction
· exact s.2 h⟩
#align stream.seq.cons Stream'.Seq.cons
@[simp]
theorem val_cons (s : Seq α) (x : α) : (cons x s).val = some x::s.val :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.val_cons Stream'.Seq.val_cons
/-- Get the nth element of a sequence (if it exists) -/
def get? : Seq α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
#align stream.seq.nth Stream'.Seq.get?
@[simp]
theorem get?_mk (f hf) : @get? α ⟨f, hf⟩ = f :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.nth_mk Stream'.Seq.get?_mk
@[simp]
theorem get?_nil (n : ℕ) : (@nil α).get? n = none :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.nth_nil Stream'.Seq.get?_nil
@[simp]
theorem get?_cons_zero (a : α) (s : Seq α) : (cons a s).get? 0 = some a :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.nth_cons_zero Stream'.Seq.get?_cons_zero
@[simp]
theorem get?_cons_succ (a : α) (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : (cons a s).get? (n + 1) = s.get? n :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.nth_cons_succ Stream'.Seq.get?_cons_succ
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s t : Seq α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, s.get? n = t.get? n) : s = t :=
Subtype.eq <| funext h
#align stream.seq.ext Stream'.Seq.ext
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Seq α → Seq α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← Option.some_inj, ← get?_cons_zero, h, get?_cons_zero],
Seq.ext fun n => by simp_rw [← get?_cons_succ x s n, h, get?_cons_succ]⟩
#align stream.seq.cons_injective2 Stream'.Seq.cons_injective2
theorem cons_left_injective (s : Seq α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
#align stream.seq.cons_left_injective Stream'.Seq.cons_left_injective
theorem cons_right_injective (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
#align stream.seq.cons_right_injective Stream'.Seq.cons_right_injective
/-- A sequence has terminated at position `n` if the value at position `n` equals `none`. -/
def TerminatedAt (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
s.get? n = none
#align stream.seq.terminated_at Stream'.Seq.TerminatedAt
/-- It is decidable whether a sequence terminates at a given position. -/
instance terminatedAtDecidable (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : Decidable (s.TerminatedAt n) :=
decidable_of_iff' (s.get? n).isNone <| by unfold TerminatedAt; cases s.get? n <;> simp
#align stream.seq.terminated_at_decidable Stream'.Seq.terminatedAtDecidable
/-- A sequence terminates if there is some position `n` at which it has terminated. -/
def Terminates (s : Seq α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, s.TerminatedAt n
#align stream.seq.terminates Stream'.Seq.Terminates
theorem not_terminates_iff {s : Seq α} : ¬s.Terminates ↔ ∀ n, (s.get? n).isSome := by
simp only [Terminates, TerminatedAt, ← Ne.eq_def, Option.ne_none_iff_isSome, not_exists, iff_self]
#align stream.seq.not_terminates_iff Stream'.Seq.not_terminates_iff
/-- Functorial action of the functor `Option (α × _)` -/
@[simp]
def omap (f : β → γ) : Option (α × β) → Option (α × γ)
| none => none
| some (a, b) => some (a, f b)
#align stream.seq.omap Stream'.Seq.omap
/-- Get the first element of a sequence -/
def head (s : Seq α) : Option α :=
get? s 0
#align stream.seq.head Stream'.Seq.head
/-- Get the tail of a sequence (or `nil` if the sequence is `nil`) -/
def tail (s : Seq α) : Seq α :=
⟨s.1.tail, fun n' => by
cases' s with f al
exact al n'⟩
#align stream.seq.tail Stream'.Seq.tail
/-- member definition for `Seq`-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : Seq α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
#align stream.seq.mem Stream'.Seq.Mem
instance : Membership α (Seq α) :=
⟨Seq.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Seq α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.get? m = none → s.get? n = none := by
cases' s with f al
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
#align stream.seq.le_stable Stream'.Seq.le_stable
/-- If a sequence terminated at position `n`, it also terminated at `m ≥ n`. -/
theorem terminated_stable : ∀ (s : Seq α) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → s.TerminatedAt m → s.TerminatedAt n :=
le_stable
#align stream.seq.terminated_stable Stream'.Seq.terminated_stable
/-- If `s.get? n = some aₙ` for some value `aₙ`, then there is also some value `aₘ` such
that `s.get? = some aₘ` for `m ≤ n`.
-/
theorem ge_stable (s : Seq α) {aₙ : α} {n m : ℕ} (m_le_n : m ≤ n)
(s_nth_eq_some : s.get? n = some aₙ) : ∃ aₘ : α, s.get? m = some aₘ :=
have : s.get? n ≠ none := by simp [s_nth_eq_some]
have : s.get? m ≠ none := mt (s.le_stable m_le_n) this
Option.ne_none_iff_exists'.mp this
#align stream.seq.ge_stable Stream'.Seq.ge_stable
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α := fun ⟨_, (h : some a = none)⟩ => by injection h
#align stream.seq.not_mem_nil Stream'.Seq.not_mem_nil
theorem mem_cons (a : α) : ∀ s : Seq α, a ∈ cons a s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Stream'.mem_cons (some a) _
#align stream.seq.mem_cons Stream'.Seq.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem (y : α) {a : α} : ∀ {s : Seq α}, a ∈ s → a ∈ cons y s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem (some y)
#align stream.seq.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.Seq.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} : ∀ {s : Seq α}, a ∈ cons b s → a = b ∨ a ∈ s
| ⟨f, al⟩, h => (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).imp_left fun h => by injection h
#align stream.seq.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Stream'.Seq.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff {a b : α} {s : Seq α} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
⟨eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, by rintro (rfl | m) <;> [apply mem_cons; exact mem_cons_of_mem _ m]⟩
#align stream.seq.mem_cons_iff Stream'.Seq.mem_cons_iff
/-- Destructor for a sequence, resulting in either `none` (for `nil`) or
`some (a, s)` (for `cons a s`). -/
def destruct (s : Seq α) : Option (Seq1 α) :=
(fun a' => (a', s.tail)) <$> get? s 0
#align stream.seq.destruct Stream'.Seq.destruct
theorem destruct_eq_nil {s : Seq α} : destruct s = none → s = nil := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : get? s 0 <;> intro h
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
exacts [f0, s.2 IH]
· contradiction
#align stream.seq.destruct_eq_nil Stream'.Seq.destruct_eq_nil
theorem destruct_eq_cons {s : Seq α} {a s'} : destruct s = some (a, s') → s = cons a s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : get? s 0 with a' <;> intro h
· contradiction
· cases' s with f al
injections _ h1 h2
rw [← h2]
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [tail, cons]
rw [h1] at f0
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
#align stream.seq.destruct_eq_cons Stream'.Seq.destruct_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : Seq α) = none :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.destruct_nil Stream'.Seq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) : ∀ s, destruct (cons a s) = some (a, s)
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
unfold cons destruct Functor.map
apply congr_arg fun s => some (a, s)
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail]
#align stream.seq.destruct_cons Stream'.Seq.destruct_cons
-- Porting note: needed universe annotation to avoid universe issues
theorem head_eq_destruct (s : Seq α) : head.{u} s = Prod.fst.{u} <$> destruct.{u} s := by
unfold destruct head; cases get? s 0 <;> rfl
#align stream.seq.head_eq_destruct Stream'.Seq.head_eq_destruct
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : Seq α) = none :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.head_nil Stream'.Seq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = some a := by
rw [head_eq_destruct, destruct_cons, Option.map_eq_map, Option.map_some']
#align stream.seq.head_cons Stream'.Seq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : Seq α) = nil :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.tail_nil Stream'.Seq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by
cases' s with f al
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [tail, cons]
#align stream.seq.tail_cons Stream'.Seq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem get?_tail (s : Seq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.nth_tail Stream'.Seq.get?_tail
/-- Recursion principle for sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Seq α → Sort v} (s : Seq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s)) :
C s := by
cases' H : destruct s with v
· rw [destruct_eq_nil H]
apply h1
· cases' v with a s'
rw [destruct_eq_cons H]
apply h2
#align stream.seq.rec_on Stream'.Seq.recOn
theorem mem_rec_on {C : Seq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s)
(h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s')) : C s := by
cases' M with k e; unfold Stream'.get at e
induction' k with k IH generalizing s
· have TH : s = cons a (tail s) := by
apply destruct_eq_cons
unfold destruct get? Functor.map
rw [← e]
rfl
rw [TH]
apply h1 _ _ (Or.inl rfl)
-- Porting note: had to reshuffle `intro`
revert e; apply s.recOn _ fun b s' => _
· intro e; injection e
· intro b s' e
have h_eq : (cons b s').val (Nat.succ k) = s'.val k := by cases s'; rfl
rw [h_eq] at e
apply h1 _ _ (Or.inr (IH e))
#align stream.seq.mem_rec_on Stream'.Seq.mem_rec_on
/-- Corecursor over pairs of `Option` values-/
def Corec.f (f : β → Option (α × β)) : Option β → Option α × Option β
| none => (none, none)
| some b =>
match f b with
| none => (none, none)
| some (a, b') => (some a, some b')
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align stream.seq.corec.F Stream'.Seq.Corec.f
/-- Corecursor for `Seq α` as a coinductive type. Iterates `f` to produce new elements
of the sequence until `none` is obtained. -/
def corec (f : β → Option (α × β)) (b : β) : Seq α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (some b), fun {n} h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (some b)).2 n = none
revert h; generalize some b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = none → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = none
cases' o with b <;> intro h
· rfl
dsimp [Corec.f] at h
dsimp [Corec.f]
revert h; cases' h₁: f b with s <;> intro h
· rfl
· cases' s with a b'
contradiction
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
#align stream.seq.corec Stream'.Seq.corec
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → Option (α × β)) (b : β) :
destruct (corec f b) = omap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct, get]
-- Porting note: next two lines were `change`...`with`...
have h: Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (some b) 0 = (Corec.f f (some b)).1 := rfl
rw [h]
dsimp [Corec.f]
induction' h : f b with s; · rfl
cases' s with a b'; dsimp [Corec.f]
apply congr_arg fun b' => some (a, b')
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
#align stream.seq.corec_eq Stream'.Seq.corec_eq
section Bisim
variable (R : Seq α → Seq α → Prop)
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity relation over `Option` of `Seq1 α`-/
def BisimO : Option (Seq1 α) → Option (Seq1 α) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (a', s') => a = a' ∧ R s s'
| _, _ => False
#align stream.seq.bisim_o Stream'.Seq.BisimO
attribute [simp] BisimO
/-- a relation is bisimilar if it meets the `BisimO` test-/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
#align stream.seq.is_bisimulation Stream'.Seq.IsBisimulation
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Seq α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
exact
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ => by
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have := bisim r; revert r this
apply recOn s _ _ <;> apply recOn s' _ _
· intro r _
constructor
· rfl
· assumption
· intro x s _ this
rw [destruct_nil, destruct_cons] at this
exact False.elim this
· intro x s _ this
rw [destruct_nil, destruct_cons] at this
exact False.elim this
· intro x s x' s' _ this
rw [destruct_cons, destruct_cons] at this
rw [head_cons, head_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
cases' this with h1 h2
constructor
· rw [h1]
· exact h2
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
#align stream.seq.eq_of_bisim Stream'.Seq.eq_of_bisim
end Bisim
theorem coinduction :
∀ {s₁ s₂ : Seq α},
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Seq α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂
| _, _, hh, ht =>
Subtype.eq (Stream'.coinduction hh fun β fr => ht β fun s => fr s.1)
#align stream.seq.coinduction Stream'.Seq.coinduction
theorem coinduction2 (s) (f g : Seq α → Seq β)
(H :
∀ s,
BisimO (fun s1 s2 : Seq β => ∃ s : Seq α, s1 = f s ∧ s2 = g s) (destruct (f s))
(destruct (g s))) :
f s = g s := by
refine eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => ∃ s, s1 = f s ∧ s2 = g s) ?_ ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨s, h1, h2⟩
rw [h1, h2]; apply H
#align stream.seq.coinduction2 Stream'.Seq.coinduction2
/-- Embed a list as a sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : Seq α :=
⟨List.get? l, fun {n} h => by
rw [List.get?_eq_none] at h ⊢
exact h.trans (Nat.le_succ n)⟩
#align stream.seq.of_list Stream'.Seq.ofList
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (Seq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.seq.coe_list Stream'.Seq.coeList
@[simp]
theorem ofList_nil : ofList [] = (nil : Seq α) :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.of_list_nil Stream'.Seq.ofList_nil
@[simp]
theorem ofList_get (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : (ofList l).get? n = l.get? n :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.of_list_nth Stream'.Seq.ofList_get
@[simp]
theorem ofList_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : ofList (a::l) = cons a (ofList l) := by
ext1 (_ | n) <;> rfl
#align stream.seq.of_list_cons Stream'.Seq.ofList_cons
/-- Embed an infinite stream as a sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (s : Stream' α) : Seq α :=
⟨s.map some, fun {n} h => by contradiction⟩
#align stream.seq.of_stream Stream'.Seq.ofStream
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (Seq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.seq.coe_stream Stream'.Seq.coeStream
/-- Embed a `LazyList α` as a sequence. Note that even though this
is non-meta, it will produce infinite sequences if used with
cyclic `LazyList`s created by meta constructions. -/
def ofLazyList : LazyList α → Seq α :=
corec fun l =>
match l with
| LazyList.nil => none
| LazyList.cons a l' => some (a, l'.get)
#align stream.seq.of_lazy_list Stream'.Seq.ofLazyList
instance coeLazyList : Coe (LazyList α) (Seq α) :=
⟨ofLazyList⟩
#align stream.seq.coe_lazy_list Stream'.Seq.coeLazyList
/-- Translate a sequence into a `LazyList`. Since `LazyList` and `List`
are isomorphic as non-meta types, this function is necessarily meta. -/
unsafe def toLazyList : Seq α → LazyList α
| s =>
match destruct s with
| none => LazyList.nil
| some (a, s') => LazyList.cons a (toLazyList s')
#align stream.seq.to_lazy_list Stream'.Seq.toLazyList
/-- Translate a sequence to a list. This function will run forever if
run on an infinite sequence. -/
unsafe def forceToList (s : Seq α) : List α :=
(toLazyList s).toList
#align stream.seq.force_to_list Stream'.Seq.forceToList
/-- The sequence of natural numbers some 0, some 1, ... -/
def nats : Seq ℕ :=
Stream'.nats
#align stream.seq.nats Stream'.Seq.nats
@[simp]
theorem nats_get? (n : ℕ) : nats.get? n = some n :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.nats_nth Stream'.Seq.nats_get?
/-- Append two sequences. If `s₁` is infinite, then `s₁ ++ s₂ = s₁`,
otherwise it puts `s₂` at the location of the `nil` in `s₁`. -/
def append (s₁ s₂ : Seq α) : Seq α :=
@corec α (Seq α × Seq α)
(fun ⟨s₁, s₂⟩ =>
match destruct s₁ with
| none => omap (fun s₂ => (nil, s₂)) (destruct s₂)
| some (a, s₁') => some (a, s₁', s₂))
(s₁, s₂)
#align stream.seq.append Stream'.Seq.append
/-- Map a function over a sequence. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Seq α → Seq β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map (Option.map f), fun {n} => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with e <;> intro
· rw [al e]
assumption
· contradiction⟩
#align stream.seq.map Stream'.Seq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of sequences. (It is required that the
sequences be nonempty to ensure productivity; in the case
of an infinite sequence of `nil`, the first element is never
generated.) -/
def join : Seq (Seq1 α) → Seq α :=
corec fun S =>
match destruct S with
| none => none
| some ((a, s), S') =>
some
(a,
match destruct s with
| none => S'
| some s' => cons s' S')
#align stream.seq.join Stream'.Seq.join
/-- Remove the first `n` elements from the sequence. -/
def drop (s : Seq α) : ℕ → Seq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.seq.drop Stream'.Seq.drop
attribute [simp] drop
/-- Take the first `n` elements of the sequence (producing a list) -/
def take : ℕ → Seq α → List α
| 0, _ => []
| n + 1, s =>
match destruct s with
| none => []
| some (x, r) => List.cons x (take n r)
#align stream.seq.take Stream'.Seq.take
/-- Split a sequence at `n`, producing a finite initial segment
and an infinite tail. -/
def splitAt : ℕ → Seq α → List α × Seq α
| 0, s => ([], s)
| n + 1, s =>
match destruct s with
| none => ([], nil)
| some (x, s') =>
let (l, r) := splitAt n s'
(List.cons x l, r)
#align stream.seq.split_at Stream'.Seq.splitAt
section ZipWith
/-- Combine two sequences with a function -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s₁ : Seq α) (s₂ : Seq β) : Seq γ :=
⟨fun n => Option.map₂ f (s₁.get? n) (s₂.get? n), fun {_} hn =>
Option.map₂_eq_none_iff.2 <| (Option.map₂_eq_none_iff.1 hn).imp s₁.2 s₂.2⟩
#align stream.seq.zip_with Stream'.Seq.zipWith
variable {s : Seq α} {s' : Seq β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem get?_zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s s' n) :
(zipWith f s s').get? n = Option.map₂ f (s.get? n) (s'.get? n) :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.nth_zip_with Stream'.Seq.get?_zipWith
end ZipWith
/-- Pair two sequences into a sequence of pairs -/
def zip : Seq α → Seq β → Seq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.seq.zip Stream'.Seq.zip
theorem get?_zip (s : Seq α) (t : Seq β) (n : ℕ) :
get? (zip s t) n = Option.map₂ Prod.mk (get? s n) (get? t n) :=
get?_zipWith _ _ _ _
#align stream.seq.nth_zip Stream'.Seq.get?_zip
/-- Separate a sequence of pairs into two sequences -/
def unzip (s : Seq (α × β)) : Seq α × Seq β :=
(map Prod.fst s, map Prod.snd s)
#align stream.seq.unzip Stream'.Seq.unzip
/-- Enumerate a sequence by tagging each element with its index. -/
def enum (s : Seq α) : Seq (ℕ × α) :=
Seq.zip nats s
#align stream.seq.enum Stream'.Seq.enum
@[simp]
theorem get?_enum (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : get? (enum s) n = Option.map (Prod.mk n) (get? s n) :=
get?_zip _ _ _
#align stream.seq.nth_enum Stream'.Seq.get?_enum
@[simp]
theorem enum_nil : enum (nil : Seq α) = nil :=
rfl
#align stream.seq.enum_nil Stream'.Seq.enum_nil
/-- Convert a sequence which is known to terminate into a list -/
def toList (s : Seq α) (h : s.Terminates) : List α :=
take (Nat.find h) s
#align stream.seq.to_list Stream'.Seq.toList
/-- Convert a sequence which is known not to terminate into a stream -/
def toStream (s : Seq α) (h : ¬s.Terminates) : Stream' α := fun n =>
Option.get _ <| not_terminates_iff.1 h n
#align stream.seq.to_stream Stream'.Seq.toStream
/-- Convert a sequence into either a list or a stream depending on whether
it is finite or infinite. (Without decidability of the infiniteness predicate,
this is not constructively possible.) -/
def toListOrStream (s : Seq α) [Decidable s.Terminates] : Sum (List α) (Stream' α) :=
if h : s.Terminates then Sum.inl (toList s h) else Sum.inr (toStream s h)
#align stream.seq.to_list_or_stream Stream'.Seq.toListOrStream
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : Seq α) : append nil s = s := by
apply coinduction2; intro s
dsimp [append]; rw [corec_eq]
dsimp [append]; apply recOn s _ _
· trivial
· intro x s
rw [destruct_cons]
dsimp
exact ⟨rfl, s, rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.seq.nil_append Stream'.Seq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
destruct_eq_cons <| by
dsimp [append]; rw [corec_eq]
dsimp [append]; rw [destruct_cons]
#align stream.seq.cons_append Stream'.Seq.cons_append
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Seq.lean | 657 | 664 | theorem append_nil (s : Seq α) : append s nil = s := by |
apply coinduction2 s; intro s
apply recOn s _ _
· trivial
· intro x s
rw [cons_append, destruct_cons, destruct_cons]
dsimp
exact ⟨rfl, s, rfl, rfl⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, David Loeffler, Heather Macbeth, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds
/-!
# Derivatives of the Fourier transform
In this file we compute the Fréchet derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`, where `f` is a
function such that both `f` and `v ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖` are integrable. Here the Fourier transform is
understood as an operator `(V → E) → (W → E)`, where `V` and `W` are normed `ℝ`-vector spaces
and the Fourier transform is taken with respect to a continuous `ℝ`-bilinear
pairing `L : V × W → ℝ` and a given reference measure `μ`.
We also investigate higher derivatives: Assuming that `‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖` is integrable, we show
that the Fourier transform of `f` is `C^n`.
We also study in a parallel way the Fourier transform of the derivative, which is obtained by
tensoring the Fourier transform of the original function with the bilinear form. We also get
results for iterated derivatives.
A consequence of these results is that, if a function is smooth and all its derivatives are
integrable when multiplied by `‖v‖^k`, then the same goes for its Fourier transform, with
explicit bounds.
We give specialized versions of these results on inner product spaces (where `L` is the scalar
product) and on the real line, where we express the one-dimensional derivative in more concrete
terms, as the Fourier transform of `-2πI x * f x` (or `(-2πI x)^n * f x` for higher derivatives).
## Main definitions and results
We introduce two convenience definitions:
* `VectorFourier.fourierSMulRight L f`: given `f : V → E` and `L` a bilinear pairing
between `V` and `W`, then this is the function `fun v ↦ -(2 * π * I) (L v ⬝) • f v`,
from `V` to `Hom (W, E)`.
This is essentially `ContinousLinearMap.smulRight`, up to the factor `- 2πI` designed to make sure
that the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier
integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierPowSMulRight` is the higher order analogue for higher derivatives:
`fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` is informally `(-(2 * π * I))^n (L v ⬝)^n • f v`, in
the space of continuous multilinear maps `W [×n]→L[ℝ] E`.
With these definitions, the statements read as follows, first in a general context
(arbitrary `L` and `μ`):
* `VectorFourier.hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable, with
derivative the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f`.
* `VectorFourier.differentiable_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable.
* `VectorFourier.fderiv_fourierIntegral`: formula for the derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_fderiv`: formula for the Fourier integral of the derivative of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` has an explicit Taylor series up to order `N`, given by the Fourier
integrals of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.contDiff_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` is `C^n`.
* `VectorFourier.iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
explicit formula for the `n`-th derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`, as the Fourier
integral of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.pow_mul_norm_iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral_le`: explicit bounds for the `n`-th
derivative of the Fourier integral, multiplied by a power function, in terms of corresponding
integrals for the original function.
These statements are then specialized to the case of the usual Fourier transform on
finite-dimensional inner product spaces with their canonical Lebesgue measure (covering in
particular the case of the real line), replacing the namespace `VectorFourier` by
the namespace `Real` in the above statements.
We also give specialized versions of the one-dimensional real derivative (and iterated derivative)
in `Real.deriv_fourierIntegral` and `Real.iteratedDeriv_fourierIntegral`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Complex MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped FourierTransform Topology
-- without this local instance, Lean tries first the instance
-- `secondCountableTopologyEither_of_right` (whose priority is 100) and takes a very long time to
-- fail. Since we only use the left instance in this file, we make sure it is tried first.
attribute [local instance 101] secondCountableTopologyEither_of_left
namespace Real
lemma hasDerivAt_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) (2 * π * I * 𝐞 x) x := by
have h1 (y : ℝ) : 𝐞 y = fourier 1 (y : UnitAddCircle) := by
rw [fourierChar_apply, fourier_coe_apply]
push_cast
ring_nf
simpa only [h1, Int.cast_one, ofReal_one, div_one, mul_one] using hasDerivAt_fourier 1 1 x
lemma differentiable_fourierChar : Differentiable ℝ (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) :=
fun x ↦ (Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).differentiableAt
lemma deriv_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : deriv (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) x = 2 * π * I * 𝐞 x :=
(Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).deriv
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ)
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L v))) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert (hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg using 1
ext y
simp only [neg_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_neg,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, real_smul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right_apply (v : V) (w y : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) w y = -2 * π * I * L v y * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun w ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).differentiableAt
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L.flip w))) v :=
hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L.flip w v
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left_apply (v y : V) (w : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) v y = -2 * π * I * L y w * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (w : W) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun v ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).differentiableAt
end Real
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
namespace VectorFourier
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E)
/-- Send a function `f : V → E` to the function `f : V → Hom (W, E)` given by
`v ↦ (w ↦ -2 * π * I * L (v, w) • f v)`. This is designed so that the Fourier transform of
`fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`. -/
def fourierSMulRight (v : V) : (W →L[ℝ] E) := -(2 * π * I) • (L v).smulRight (f v)
@[simp] lemma fourierSMulRight_apply (v : V) (w : W) :
fourierSMulRight L f v w = -(2 * π * I) • L v w • f v := rfl
/-- The `w`-derivative of the Fourier transform integrand. -/
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w' ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v) (𝐞 (-L v w) • fourierSMulRight L f v) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert ((hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg).smul_const (f v)
ext w' : 1
simp_rw [fourierSMulRight, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, ← smul_assoc, smul_comm,
← smul_assoc, real_smul, real_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
push_cast
ring_nf
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by
rw [fourierSMulRight, norm_smul _ (ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (L v) (f v)),
norm_neg, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_eq_abs I, abs_I,
mul_one, norm_eq_abs ((_ : ℝ) : ℂ), Complex.abs_of_nonneg pi_pos.le, norm_eq_abs (2 : ℂ),
Complex.abs_two, ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, ← mul_assoc]
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight_le (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ ≤ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := calc
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := norm_fourierSMulRight _ _ _
_ ≤ (2 * π) * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) * ‖f v‖ := by gcongr; exact L.le_opNorm _
_ = 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by ring
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fourierSMulRight
[SecondCountableTopologyEither V (W →L[ℝ] ℝ)] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
{L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ} {f : V → E} {μ : Measure V}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ fourierSMulRight L f v) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
have aux0 : Continuous fun p : (W →L[ℝ] ℝ) × E ↦ p.1.smulRight p.2 :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.smulRightL ℝ W E).continuous₂
have aux1 : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ (L v, f v)) μ :=
L.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable.prod_mk hf
-- Elaboration without the expected type is faster here:
exact (aux0.comp_aestronglyMeasurable aux1 : _)
variable {f}
/-- Main theorem of this section: if both `f` and `x ↦ ‖x‖ * ‖f x‖` are integrable, then the
Fourier transform of `f` has a Fréchet derivative (everywhere in its domain) and its derivative is
the Fourier transform of `smulRight L f`. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)
(fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fourierSMulRight L f) w) w := by
let F : W → V → E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v
let F' : W → V → W →L[ℝ] E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • fourierSMulRight L f v
let B : V → ℝ := fun v ↦ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖
have h0 (w' : W) : Integrable (F w') μ :=
(fourierIntegral_convergent_iff continuous_fourierChar
(by apply L.continuous₂ : Continuous (fun p : V × W ↦ L.toLinearMap₂ p.1 p.2)) w').2 hf
have h1 : ∀ᶠ w' in 𝓝 w, AEStronglyMeasurable (F w') μ :=
eventually_of_forall (fun w' ↦ (h0 w').aestronglyMeasurable)
have h3 : AEStronglyMeasurable (F' w) μ := by
refine .smul ?_ hf.1.fourierSMulRight
refine (continuous_fourierChar.comp ?_).aestronglyMeasurable
exact (L.continuous₂.comp (Continuous.Prod.mk_left w)).neg
have h4 : (∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ (w' : W), w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → ‖F' w' v‖ ≤ B v) := by
filter_upwards with v w' _
rw [norm_circle_smul _ (fourierSMulRight L f v)]
exact norm_fourierSMulRight_le L f v
have h5 : Integrable B μ := by simpa only [← mul_assoc] using hf'.const_mul (2 * π * ‖L‖)
have h6 : ∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ w', w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ F x v) (F' w' v) w' :=
ae_of_all _ (fun v w' _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul L f v w')
exact hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le one_pos h1 (h0 w) h3 h4 h5 h6
lemma fderiv_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) :
fderiv ℝ (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) =
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fourierSMulRight L f) := by
ext w : 1
exact (hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L hf hf' w).fderiv
lemma differentiable_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) :
Differentiable ℝ (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) :=
fun w ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L hf hf' w).differentiableAt
/-- The Fourier integral of the derivative of a function is obtained by multiplying the Fourier
integral of the original function by `-L w v`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransformDeriv.lean | 251 | 277 | theorem fourierIntegral_fderiv [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
{μ : Measure V} [Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : Differentiable ℝ f) (hf' : Integrable (fderiv ℝ f) μ) :
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fderiv ℝ f)
= fourierSMulRight (-L.flip) (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) := by |
ext w y
let g (v : V) : ℂ := 𝐞 (-L v w)
/- First rewrite things in a simplified form, without any real change. -/
suffices ∫ x, g x • fderiv ℝ f x y ∂μ = ∫ x, (2 * ↑π * I * L y w * g x) • f x ∂μ by
rw [fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply' hf']
simpa only [fourierIntegral, ContinuousLinearMap.toLinearMap₂_apply, fourierSMulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ← integral_smul, neg_smul,
smul_neg, ← smul_smul, coe_smul, neg_neg]
-- Key step: integrate by parts with respect to `y` to switch the derivative from `f` to `g`.
have A x : fderiv ℝ g x y = - 2 * ↑π * I * L y w * g x :=
fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left_apply _ _ _ _
rw [integral_smul_fderiv_eq_neg_fderiv_smul_of_integrable, ← integral_neg]
· congr with x
simp only [A, neg_mul, neg_smul, neg_neg]
· have : Integrable (fun x ↦ (-(2 * ↑π * I * ↑((L y) w)) • ((g x : ℂ) • f x))) μ :=
((fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 hf).smul _
convert this using 2 with x
simp only [A, neg_mul, neg_smul, smul_smul]
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 (hf'.apply_continuousLinearMap _)
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 hf
· exact differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left _ _
· exact h'f
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
#align_import linear_algebra.trace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4cf7ca0e69e048b006674cf4499e5c7d296a89e0"
/-!
# Trace of a linear map
This file defines the trace of a linear map.
See also `LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Trace.lean` for the trace of a matrix.
## Tags
linear_map, trace, diagonal
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace LinearMap
open Matrix
open FiniteDimensional
open TensorProduct
section
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] [Fintype κ]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (c : Basis κ R M)
/-- The trace of an endomorphism given a basis. -/
def traceAux : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
Matrix.traceLinearMap ι R R ∘ₗ ↑(LinearMap.toMatrix b b)
#align linear_map.trace_aux LinearMap.traceAux
-- Can't be `simp` because it would cause a loop.
theorem traceAux_def (b : Basis ι R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
traceAux R b f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.trace_aux_def LinearMap.traceAux_def
theorem traceAux_eq : traceAux R b = traceAux R c :=
LinearMap.ext fun f =>
calc
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) =
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b ((LinearMap.id.comp f).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.comp_id]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id * LinearMap.toMatrix c c f *
LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f * LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id *
LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.trace_mul_comm]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c ((f.comp LinearMap.id).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ b, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by rw [LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.comp_id]
#align linear_map.trace_aux_eq LinearMap.traceAux_eq
open scoped Classical
variable (M)
/-- Trace of an endomorphism independent of basis. -/
def trace : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then traceAux R H.choose_spec.some else 0
#align linear_map.trace LinearMap.trace
variable {M}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `trace_eq_matrix_trace`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Trace.lean | 84 | 89 | theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset {s : Finset M} (b : Basis s R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by |
have : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) := ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← traceAux_def]
congr 1
apply traceAux_eq
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
#align_import measure_theory.covering.vitali_family from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Vitali families
On a metric space `X` with a measure `μ`, consider for each `x : X` a family of measurable sets with
nonempty interiors, called `setsAt x`. This family is a Vitali family if it satisfies the following
property: consider a (possibly non-measurable) set `s`, and for any `x` in `s` a
subfamily `f x` of `setsAt x` containing sets of arbitrarily small diameter. Then one can extract
a disjoint subfamily covering almost all `s`.
Vitali families are provided by covering theorems such as the Besicovitch covering theorem or the
Vitali covering theorem. They make it possible to formulate general versions of theorems on
differentiations of measure that apply in both contexts.
This file gives the basic definition of Vitali families. More interesting developments of this
notion are deferred to other files:
* constructions of specific Vitali families are provided by the Besicovitch covering theorem, in
`Besicovitch.vitaliFamily`, and by the Vitali covering theorem, in `Vitali.vitaliFamily`.
* The main theorem on differentiation of measures along a Vitali family is proved in
`VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`.
## Main definitions
* `VitaliFamily μ` is a structure made, for each `x : X`, of a family of sets around `x`, such that
one can extract an almost everywhere disjoint covering from any subfamily containing sets of
arbitrarily small diameters.
Let `v` be such a Vitali family.
* `v.FineSubfamilyOn` describes the subfamilies of `v` from which one can extract almost
everywhere disjoint coverings. This property, called
`v.FineSubfamilyOn.exists_disjoint_covering_ae`, is essentially a restatement of the definition
of a Vitali family. We also provide an API to use efficiently such a disjoint covering.
* `v.filterAt x` is a filter on sets of `X`, such that convergence with respect to this filter
means convergence when sets in the Vitali family shrink towards `x`.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.8][Federer1996] (Vitali families are called
Vitali relations there)
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open Filter MeasureTheory Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α]
/-- On a metric space `X` with a measure `μ`, consider for each `x : X` a family of measurable sets
with nonempty interiors, called `setsAt x`. This family is a Vitali family if it satisfies the
following property: consider a (possibly non-measurable) set `s`, and for any `x` in `s` a
subfamily `f x` of `setsAt x` containing sets of arbitrarily small diameter. Then one can extract
a disjoint subfamily covering almost all `s`.
Vitali families are provided by covering theorems such as the Besicovitch covering theorem or the
Vitali covering theorem. They make it possible to formulate general versions of theorems on
differentiations of measure that apply in both contexts.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure VitaliFamily {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) where
/-- Sets of the family "centered" at a given point. -/
setsAt : α → Set (Set α)
/-- All sets of the family are measurable. -/
measurableSet : ∀ x : α, ∀ s ∈ setsAt x, MeasurableSet s
/-- All sets of the family have nonempty interior. -/
nonempty_interior : ∀ x : α, ∀ s ∈ setsAt x, (interior s).Nonempty
/-- For any closed ball around `x`, there exists a set of the family contained in this ball. -/
nontrivial : ∀ (x : α), ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s ∈ setsAt x, s ⊆ closedBall x ε
/-- Consider a (possibly non-measurable) set `s`,
and for any `x` in `s` a subfamily `f x` of `setsAt x`
containing sets of arbitrarily small diameter.
Then one can extract a disjoint subfamily covering almost all `s`. -/
covering : ∀ (s : Set α) (f : α → Set (Set α)),
(∀ x ∈ s, f x ⊆ setsAt x) → (∀ x ∈ s, ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ a ∈ f x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε) →
∃ t : Set (α × Set α), (∀ p ∈ t, p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p ↦ p.2) ∧
(∀ p ∈ t, p.2 ∈ f p.1) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ t, p.2) = 0
#align vitali_family VitaliFamily
namespace VitaliFamily
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- A Vitali family for a measure `μ` is also a Vitali family for any measure absolutely continuous
with respect to `μ`. -/
def mono (v : VitaliFamily μ) (ν : Measure α) (hν : ν ≪ μ) : VitaliFamily ν where
__ := v
covering s f h h' :=
let ⟨t, ts, disj, mem_f, hμ⟩ := v.covering s f h h'
⟨t, ts, disj, mem_f, hν hμ⟩
#align vitali_family.mono VitaliFamily.mono
/-- Given a Vitali family `v` for a measure `μ`, a family `f` is a fine subfamily on a set `s` if
every point `x` in `s` belongs to arbitrarily small sets in `v.setsAt x ∩ f x`. This is precisely
the subfamilies for which the Vitali family definition ensures that one can extract a disjoint
covering of almost all `s`. -/
def FineSubfamilyOn (v : VitaliFamily μ) (f : α → Set (Set α)) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ a ∈ v.setsAt x ∩ f x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn
namespace FineSubfamilyOn
variable {v : VitaliFamily μ} {f : α → Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} (h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s)
theorem exists_disjoint_covering_ae :
∃ t : Set (α × Set α),
(∀ p : α × Set α, p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧
(t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p => p.2) ∧
(∀ p : α × Set α, p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ v.setsAt p.1 ∩ f p.1) ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × Set α) (_ : p ∈ t), p.2) = 0 :=
v.covering s (fun x => v.setsAt x ∩ f x) (fun _ _ => inter_subset_left) h
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.exists_disjoint_covering_ae VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.exists_disjoint_covering_ae
/-- Given `h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s`, then `h.index` is a set parametrizing a disjoint
covering of almost every `s`. -/
protected def index : Set (α × Set α) :=
h.exists_disjoint_covering_ae.choose
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.index VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.index
-- Porting note: Needed to add `(_h : FineSubfamilyOn v f s)`
/-- Given `h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s`, then `h.covering p` is a set in the family,
for `p ∈ h.index`, such that these sets form a disjoint covering of almost every `s`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
protected def covering (_h : FineSubfamilyOn v f s) : α × Set α → Set α :=
fun p => p.2
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.covering VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.covering
theorem index_subset : ∀ p : α × Set α, p ∈ h.index → p.1 ∈ s :=
h.exists_disjoint_covering_ae.choose_spec.1
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.index_subset VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.index_subset
theorem covering_disjoint : h.index.PairwiseDisjoint h.covering :=
h.exists_disjoint_covering_ae.choose_spec.2.1
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.covering_disjoint VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.covering_disjoint
theorem covering_disjoint_subtype : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun x : h.index => h.covering x) :=
(pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set _ _).2 h.covering_disjoint
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.covering_disjoint_subtype VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.covering_disjoint_subtype
theorem covering_mem {p : α × Set α} (hp : p ∈ h.index) : h.covering p ∈ f p.1 :=
(h.exists_disjoint_covering_ae.choose_spec.2.2.1 p hp).2
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.covering_mem VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.covering_mem
theorem covering_mem_family {p : α × Set α} (hp : p ∈ h.index) : h.covering p ∈ v.setsAt p.1 :=
(h.exists_disjoint_covering_ae.choose_spec.2.2.1 p hp).1
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.covering_mem_family VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.covering_mem_family
theorem measure_diff_biUnion : μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ h.index, h.covering p) = 0 :=
h.exists_disjoint_covering_ae.choose_spec.2.2.2
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.measure_diff_bUnion VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.measure_diff_biUnion
theorem index_countable [SecondCountableTopology α] : h.index.Countable :=
h.covering_disjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior fun _ hx =>
v.nonempty_interior _ _ (h.covering_mem_family hx)
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.index_countable VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.index_countable
protected theorem measurableSet_u {p : α × Set α} (hp : p ∈ h.index) :
MeasurableSet (h.covering p) :=
v.measurableSet p.1 _ (h.covering_mem_family hp)
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.measurable_set_u VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.measurableSet_u
theorem measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous [SecondCountableTopology α] {ρ : Measure α}
(hρ : ρ ≪ μ) : ρ s ≤ ∑' p : h.index, ρ (h.covering p) :=
calc
ρ s ≤ ρ ((s \ ⋃ p ∈ h.index, h.covering p) ∪ ⋃ p ∈ h.index, h.covering p) :=
measure_mono (by simp only [subset_union_left, diff_union_self])
_ ≤ ρ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ h.index, h.covering p) + ρ (⋃ p ∈ h.index, h.covering p) :=
(measure_union_le _ _)
_ = ∑' p : h.index, ρ (h.covering p) := by
rw [hρ h.measure_diff_biUnion, zero_add,
measure_biUnion h.index_countable h.covering_disjoint fun x hx => h.measurableSet_u hx]
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutely_continuous VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous
theorem measure_le_tsum [SecondCountableTopology α] : μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) :=
h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on.measure_le_tsum VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn.measure_le_tsum
end FineSubfamilyOn
/-- One can enlarge a Vitali family by adding to the sets `f x` at `x` all sets which are not
contained in a `δ`-neighborhood on `x`. This does not change the local filter at a point, but it
can be convenient to get a nicer global behavior. -/
def enlarge (v : VitaliFamily μ) (δ : ℝ) (δpos : 0 < δ) : VitaliFamily μ where
setsAt x := v.setsAt x ∪ { a | MeasurableSet a ∧ (interior a).Nonempty ∧ ¬a ⊆ closedBall x δ }
measurableSet x a ha := by
cases' ha with ha ha
exacts [v.measurableSet _ _ ha, ha.1]
nonempty_interior x a ha := by
cases' ha with ha ha
exacts [v.nonempty_interior _ _ ha, ha.2.1]
nontrivial := by
intro x ε εpos
rcases v.nontrivial x ε εpos with ⟨a, ha, h'a⟩
exact ⟨a, mem_union_left _ ha, h'a⟩
covering := by
intro s f fset ffine
let g : α → Set (Set α) := fun x => f x ∩ v.setsAt x
have : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ ε : ℝ, ε > 0 → ∃ (a : Set α), a ∈ g x ∧ a ⊆ closedBall x ε := by
intro x hx ε εpos
obtain ⟨a, af, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ f x, a ⊆ closedBall x (min ε δ) :=
ffine x hx (min ε δ) (lt_min εpos δpos)
rcases fset x hx af with (h'a | h'a)
· exact ⟨a, ⟨af, h'a⟩, ha.trans (closedBall_subset_closedBall (min_le_left _ _))⟩
· refine False.elim (h'a.2.2 ?_)
exact ha.trans (closedBall_subset_closedBall (min_le_right _ _))
rcases v.covering s g (fun x _ => inter_subset_right) this with ⟨t, ts, tdisj, tg, μt⟩
exact ⟨t, ts, tdisj, fun p hp => (tg p hp).1, μt⟩
#align vitali_family.enlarge VitaliFamily.enlarge
variable (v : VitaliFamily μ)
/-- Given a vitali family `v`, then `v.filterAt x` is the filter on `Set α` made of those families
that contain all sets of `v.setsAt x` of a sufficiently small diameter. This filter makes it
possible to express limiting behavior when sets in `v.setsAt x` shrink to `x`. -/
def filterAt (x : α) : Filter (Set α) := (𝓝 x).smallSets ⊓ 𝓟 (v.setsAt x)
#align vitali_family.filter_at VitaliFamily.filterAt
theorem _root_.Filter.HasBasis.vitaliFamily {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {x : α}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : (v.filterAt x).HasBasis p (fun i ↦ {t ∈ v.setsAt x | t ⊆ s i}) := by
simpa only [← Set.setOf_inter_eq_sep] using h.smallSets.inf_principal _
theorem filterAt_basis_closedBall (x : α) :
(v.filterAt x).HasBasis (0 < ·) ({a ∈ v.setsAt x | a ⊆ closedBall x ·}) :=
nhds_basis_closedBall.vitaliFamily v
theorem mem_filterAt_iff {x : α} {s : Set (Set α)} :
s ∈ v.filterAt x ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∀ a ∈ v.setsAt x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε → a ∈ s := by
simp only [(v.filterAt_basis_closedBall x).mem_iff, ← and_imp, subset_def, mem_setOf]
#align vitali_family.mem_filter_at_iff VitaliFamily.mem_filterAt_iff
instance filterAt_neBot (x : α) : (v.filterAt x).NeBot :=
(v.filterAt_basis_closedBall x).neBot_iff.2 <| v.nontrivial _ _
#align vitali_family.filter_at_ne_bot VitaliFamily.filterAt_neBot
theorem eventually_filterAt_iff {x : α} {P : Set α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, P a) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∀ a ∈ v.setsAt x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε → P a :=
v.mem_filterAt_iff
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_iff VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_iff
theorem tendsto_filterAt_iff {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → Set α} {x : α} :
Tendsto f l (v.filterAt x) ↔
(∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ v.setsAt x) ∧ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ⊆ closedBall x ε := by
simp only [filterAt, tendsto_inf, nhds_basis_closedBall.smallSets.tendsto_right_iff,
tendsto_principal, and_comm, mem_powerset_iff]
#align vitali_family.tendsto_filter_at_iff VitaliFamily.tendsto_filterAt_iff
theorem eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, a ∈ v.setsAt x :=
(v.tendsto_filterAt_iff.mp tendsto_id).1
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_mem_sets VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt
theorem eventually_filterAt_subset_closedBall (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ a : Set α in v.filterAt x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε :=
(v.tendsto_filterAt_iff.mp tendsto_id).2 ε hε
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_subset_closed_ball VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_subset_closedBall
theorem eventually_filterAt_measurableSet (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, MeasurableSet a := by
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x] with _ ha using v.measurableSet _ _ ha
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_measurable_set VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_measurableSet
theorem frequently_filterAt_iff {x : α} {P : Set α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, P a) ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ a ∈ v.setsAt x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε ∧ P a := by
simp only [(v.filterAt_basis_closedBall x).frequently_iff, ← and_assoc, subset_def, mem_setOf]
#align vitali_family.frequently_filter_at_iff VitaliFamily.frequently_filterAt_iff
theorem eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds {x : α} {o : Set α} (hx : o ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, a ⊆ o :=
(eventually_smallSets_subset.2 hx).filter_mono inf_le_left
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_subset_of_nhds VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/VitaliFamily.lean | 278 | 283 | theorem fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently (v : VitaliFamily μ) (f : α → Set (Set α)) (s : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, a ∈ f x) : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by |
intro x hx ε εpos
obtain ⟨a, av, ha, af⟩ : ∃ (a : Set α) , a ∈ v.setsAt x ∧ a ⊆ closedBall x ε ∧ a ∈ f x :=
v.frequently_filterAt_iff.1 (h x hx) ε εpos
exact ⟨a, ⟨av, af⟩, ha⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# The complex `log` function
Basic properties, relationship with `exp`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped Real Topology ComplexConjugate
/-- Inverse of the `exp` function. Returns values such that `(log x).im > - π` and `(log x).im ≤ π`.
`log 0 = 0`-/
-- Porting note: @[pp_nodot] does not exist in mathlib4
noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ :=
x.abs.log + arg x * I
#align complex.log Complex.log
theorem log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_re Complex.log_re
theorem log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_im Complex.log_im
theorem neg_pi_lt_log_im (x : ℂ) : -π < (log x).im := by simp only [log_im, neg_pi_lt_arg]
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im Complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im
theorem log_im_le_pi (x : ℂ) : (log x).im ≤ π := by simp only [log_im, arg_le_pi]
#align complex.log_im_le_pi Complex.log_im_le_pi
theorem exp_log {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [log, exp_add_mul_I, ← ofReal_sin, sin_arg, ← ofReal_cos, cos_arg hx, ← ofReal_exp,
Real.exp_log (abs.pos hx), mul_add, ofReal_div, ofReal_div,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.2 <| abs.ne_zero hx), ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.2 <| abs.ne_zero hx), re_add_im]
#align complex.exp_log Complex.exp_log
@[simp]
theorem range_exp : Set.range exp = {0}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨by
rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact exp_ne_zero x, fun hx => ⟨log x, exp_log hx⟩⟩
#align complex.range_exp Complex.range_exp
theorem log_exp {x : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π) : log (exp x) = x := by
rw [log, abs_exp, Real.log_exp, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, ← ofReal_exp,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (Real.exp_pos _) ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, re_add_im]
#align complex.log_exp Complex.log_exp
theorem exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi {x y : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π) (hy₁ : -π < y.im)
(hy₂ : y.im ≤ π) (hxy : exp x = exp y) : x = y := by
rw [← log_exp hx₁ hx₂, ← log_exp hy₁ hy₂, hxy]
#align complex.exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi Complex.exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi
theorem ofReal_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (x.log : ℂ) = log x :=
Complex.ext (by rw [log_re, ofReal_re, abs_of_nonneg hx])
(by rw [ofReal_im, log_im, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx])
#align complex.of_real_log Complex.ofReal_log
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_log {n : ℕ} : Real.log n = log n := ofReal_natCast n ▸ ofReal_log n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_log {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Real.log (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = log (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
natCast_log
theorem log_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (log (x : ℂ)).re = Real.log x := by simp [log_re]
#align complex.log_of_real_re Complex.log_ofReal_re
theorem log_ofReal_mul {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
log (r * x) = Real.log r + log x := by
replace hx := Complex.abs.ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
simp_rw [log, map_mul, abs_ofReal, arg_real_mul _ hr, abs_of_pos hr, Real.log_mul hr.ne' hx,
ofReal_add, add_assoc]
#align complex.log_of_real_mul Complex.log_ofReal_mul
theorem log_mul_ofReal (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
log (x * r) = Real.log r + log x := by rw [mul_comm, log_ofReal_mul hr hx]
#align complex.log_mul_of_real Complex.log_mul_ofReal
lemma log_mul_eq_add_log_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
log (x * y) = log x + log y ↔ arg x + arg y ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
refine ext_iff.trans <| Iff.trans ?_ <| arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff hx₀ hy₀
simp_rw [add_re, add_im, log_re, log_im, AbsoluteValue.map_mul,
Real.log_mul (abs.ne_zero hx₀) (abs.ne_zero hy₀), true_and]
alias ⟨_, log_mul⟩ := log_mul_eq_add_log_iff
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_zero Complex.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_one Complex.log_one
theorem log_neg_one : log (-1) = π * I := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_neg_one Complex.log_neg_one
theorem log_I : log I = π / 2 * I := by simp [log]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.log_I Complex.log_I
theorem log_neg_I : log (-I) = -(π / 2) * I := by simp [log]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.log_neg_I Complex.log_neg_I
theorem log_conj_eq_ite (x : ℂ) : log (conj x) = if x.arg = π then log x else conj (log x) := by
simp_rw [log, abs_conj, arg_conj, map_add, map_mul, conj_ofReal]
split_ifs with hx
· rw [hx]
simp_rw [ofReal_neg, conj_I, mul_neg, neg_mul]
#align complex.log_conj_eq_ite Complex.log_conj_eq_ite
theorem log_conj (x : ℂ) (h : x.arg ≠ π) : log (conj x) = conj (log x) := by
rw [log_conj_eq_ite, if_neg h]
#align complex.log_conj Complex.log_conj
theorem log_inv_eq_ite (x : ℂ) : log x⁻¹ = if x.arg = π then -conj (log x) else -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
rw [inv_def, log_mul_ofReal, Real.log_inv, ofReal_neg, ← sub_eq_neg_add, log_conj_eq_ite]
· simp_rw [log, map_add, map_mul, conj_ofReal, conj_I, normSq_eq_abs, Real.log_pow,
Nat.cast_two, ofReal_mul, neg_add, mul_neg, neg_neg]
norm_num; rw [two_mul] -- Porting note: added to simplify `↑2`
split_ifs
· rw [add_sub_right_comm, sub_add_cancel_left]
· rw [add_sub_right_comm, sub_add_cancel_left]
· rwa [inv_pos, Complex.normSq_pos]
· rwa [map_ne_zero]
#align complex.log_inv_eq_ite Complex.log_inv_eq_ite
theorem log_inv (x : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by rw [log_inv_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
#align complex.log_inv Complex.log_inv
theorem two_pi_I_ne_zero : (2 * π * I : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by norm_num [Real.pi_ne_zero, I_ne_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.two_pi_I_ne_zero Complex.two_pi_I_ne_zero
theorem exp_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : exp x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = n * (2 * π * I) := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos x.im (-π) with ⟨n, hn, -⟩
use -n
rw [Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero]
have : (x + n * (2 * π * I)).im ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by simpa [two_mul, mul_add] using hn
rw [← log_exp this.1 this.2, exp_periodic.int_mul n, h, log_one]
· rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (exp_periodic.int_mul n).eq.trans exp_zero
#align complex.exp_eq_one_iff Complex.exp_eq_one_iff
theorem exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ exp (x - y) = 1 := by
rw [exp_sub, div_eq_one_iff_eq (exp_ne_zero _)]
#align complex.exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one Complex.exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one
theorem exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = y + n * (2 * π * I) := by
simp only [exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one, exp_eq_one_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
#align complex.exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int Complex.exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int
@[simp]
theorem countable_preimage_exp {s : Set ℂ} : (exp ⁻¹' s).Countable ↔ s.Countable := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, fun hs => ?_⟩
· refine ((hs.image exp).insert 0).mono ?_
rw [Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_exp, ← Set.diff_eq, ← Set.union_singleton,
Set.diff_union_self]
exact Set.subset_union_left
· rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton]
refine hs.biUnion fun z hz => ?_
rcases em (∃ w, exp w = z) with (⟨w, rfl⟩ | hne)
· simp only [Set.preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int, Set.setOf_exists]
exact Set.countable_iUnion fun m => Set.countable_singleton _
· push_neg at hne
simp [Set.preimage, hne]
#align complex.countable_preimage_exp Complex.countable_preimage_exp
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.preimage_cexp⟩ := countable_preimage_exp
#align set.countable.preimage_cexp Set.Countable.preimage_cexp
theorem tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero {z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0)
(him : z.im = 0) : Tendsto log (𝓝[{ z : ℂ | z.im < 0 }] z) (𝓝 <| Real.log (abs z) - π * I) := by
convert
(continuous_ofReal.continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt
(continuous_abs.continuousWithinAt.log _)).tendsto.add
(((continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp <|
tendsto_arg_nhdsWithin_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero hre him).mul
tendsto_const_nhds) using 1
· simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
· lift z to ℝ using him
simpa using hre.ne
#align complex.tendsto_log_nhds_within_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero Complex.tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero
theorem continuousWithinAt_log_of_re_neg_of_im_zero {z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0) (him : z.im = 0) :
ContinuousWithinAt log { z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im } z := by
convert
(continuous_ofReal.continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt
(continuous_abs.continuousWithinAt.log _)).tendsto.add
((continuous_ofReal.continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt <|
continuousWithinAt_arg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero hre him).mul
tendsto_const_nhds) using 1
lift z to ℝ using him
simpa using hre.ne
#align complex.continuous_within_at_log_of_re_neg_of_im_zero Complex.continuousWithinAt_log_of_re_neg_of_im_zero
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Log.lean | 220 | 223 | theorem tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_im_nonneg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero {z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0)
(him : z.im = 0) : Tendsto log (𝓝[{ z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im }] z) (𝓝 <| Real.log (abs z) + π * I) := by |
simpa only [log, arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩] using
(continuousWithinAt_log_of_re_neg_of_im_zero hre him).tendsto
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
import Mathlib.Analysis.MellinTransform
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gamma.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cca40788df1b8755d5baf17ab2f27dacc2e17acb"
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
* `Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma`: `Γ` is complex-differentiable at all `s : ℂ` with
`s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`,
`Real.differentiableAt_Gamma`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
#align real.Gamma_integrand_is_o Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
#align real.Gamma_integral_convergent Real.GammaIntegral_convergent
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply ContinuousAt.continuousOn
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
#align complex.Gamma_integral_convergent Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
#align complex.Gamma_integral Complex.GammaIntegral
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
#align complex.Gamma_integral_conj Complex.GammaIntegral_conj
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal' r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
#align complex.Gamma_integral_of_real Complex.GammaIntegral_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
#align complex.Gamma_integral_one Complex.GammaIntegral_one
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
#align complex.partial_Gamma Complex.partialGamma
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
#align complex.tendsto_partial_Gamma Complex.tendsto_partialGamma
private theorem Gamma_integrand_interval_integrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_interval_integrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply ContinuousAt.continuousOn
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
#align complex.partial_Gamma_add_one Complex.partialGamma_add_one
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
(fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs.map_neg, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
#align complex.Gamma_integral_add_one Complex.GammaIntegral_add_one
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
#align complex.Gamma_aux Complex.GammaAux
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]; rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1]
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀]; contrapose! h1; rw [h1]
simp
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [← hn (s + 1) hh1]
#align complex.Gamma_aux_recurrence1 Complex.GammaAux_recurrence1
theorem GammaAux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux (n + 1) s := by
cases' n with n n
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]
rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
rintro rfl
rw [zero_re] at h1
exact h1.false
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have : GammaAux n (s + 1 + 1) / (s + 1) = GammaAux n (s + 1) := by
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [GammaAux_recurrence1 (s + 1) n hh1]
rw [this]
#align complex.Gamma_aux_recurrence2 Complex.GammaAux_recurrence2
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
irreducible_def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
GammaAux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
#align complex.Gamma Complex.Gamma
theorem Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = GammaAux n s := by
have u : ∀ k : ℕ, GammaAux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s := by
intro k; induction' k with k hk
· simp [Gamma]
· rw [← hk, ← add_assoc]
refine (GammaAux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) ?_).symm
rw [Nat.cast_add]
have i0 := Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_le]; exact Nat.zero_le k
convert (u <| n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm; rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
by_cases h : 0 ≤ 1 - s.re
· apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
exact_mod_cast lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.floor_le h) (by linarith : 1 - s.re < n + 1)
· rw [Nat.floor_of_nonpos]
· omega
· linarith
#align complex.Gamma_eq_Gamma_aux Complex.Gamma_eq_GammaAux
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` function. -/
theorem Gamma_add_one (s : ℂ) (h2 : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊
have t1 : -s.re < n := by simpa only [sub_sub_cancel_left] using Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
have t2 : -(s + 1).re < n := by rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [Gamma_eq_GammaAux s n t1, Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s + 1) n t2, GammaAux_recurrence1 s n t1]
field_simp
#align complex.Gamma_add_one Complex.Gamma_add_one
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) : Gamma s = GammaIntegral s :=
Gamma_eq_GammaAux s 0 (by norm_cast; linarith)
#align complex.Gamma_eq_integral Complex.Gamma_eq_integral
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by rw [Gamma_eq_integral] <;> simp
#align complex.Gamma_one Complex.Gamma_one
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [Gamma_add_one n.succ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n]
simp only [Nat.cast_succ, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul]; congr
#align complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (no_index (OfNat.ofNat (n + 1) : ℂ)) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [Gamma, zero_re, sub_zero, Nat.floor_one, GammaAux, div_zero]
#align complex.Gamma_zero Complex.Gamma_zero
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value 0. -/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Gamma_zero]
· have A : -(n.succ : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [neg_ne_zero, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : -(n : ℂ) = -↑n.succ + 1 := by simp
rw [this, Gamma_add_one _ A] at IH
contrapose! IH
exact mul_ne_zero A IH
#align complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero
theorem Gamma_conj (s : ℂ) : Gamma (conj s) = conj (Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : ℂ), GammaAux n (conj s) = conj (GammaAux n s) by
simp [Gamma, this]
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· rw [GammaAux]; exact GammaIntegral_conj
· intro s
rw [GammaAux]
dsimp only
rw [div_eq_mul_inv _ s, RingHom.map_mul, conj_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
suffices conj s + 1 = conj (s + 1) by rw [this, IH]
rw [RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_one]
#align complex.Gamma_conj Complex.Gamma_conj
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))` in terms of the Gamma
function, for complex `a`. -/
lemma integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
have aux : (1 / r : ℂ) ^ a = 1 / r * (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← cpow_one (1 / r : ℂ)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (one_div_ne_zero <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hr.ne'), add_sub_cancel]
calc
_ = ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * (r * t) ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) := by
refine MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hr.le hx.le, ← mul_assoc, one_div, ← ofReal_inv,
← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg (inv_pos.mpr hr).le hr.le, ← ofReal_mul r⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel hr.ne',
ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_mul]
_ = 1 / r * ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t) := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_mul]
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x ↦ _ * x ^ (a - 1) * exp (-x)) _ hr, mul_zero,
real_smul, ← one_div, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
_ = 1 / r * (1 / r : ℂ) ^ (a - 1) * (∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t)) := by
simp_rw [← integral_mul_left, mul_assoc]
_ = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [aux, Gamma_eq_integral ha]
congr 2 with x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, mul_comm]
end GammaDef
/-! Now check that the `Γ` function is differentiable, wherever this makes sense. -/
section GammaHasDeriv
/-- Rewrite the Gamma integral as an example of a Mellin transform. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_eq_mellin : GammaIntegral = mellin fun x => ↑(Real.exp (-x)) :=
funext fun s => by simp only [mellin, GammaIntegral, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align complex.Gamma_integral_eq_mellin Complex.GammaIntegral_eq_mellin
/-- The derivative of the `Γ` integral, at any `s ∈ ℂ` with `1 < re s`, is given by the Mellin
transform of `log t * exp (-t)`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_GammaIntegral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
HasDerivAt GammaIntegral (∫ t : ℝ in Ioi 0, t ^ (s - 1) * (Real.log t * Real.exp (-t))) s := by
rw [GammaIntegral_eq_mellin]
convert (mellin_hasDerivAt_of_isBigO_rpow (E := ℂ) _ _ (lt_add_one _) _ hs).2
· refine (Continuous.continuousOn ?_).locallyIntegrableOn measurableSet_Ioi
exact continuous_ofReal.comp (Real.continuous_exp.comp continuous_neg)
· rw [← isBigO_norm_left]
simp_rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, abs_ofReal, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, isBigO_norm_left]
simpa only [neg_one_mul] using (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop zero_lt_one _).isBigO
· simp_rw [neg_zero, rpow_zero]
refine isBigO_const_of_tendsto (?_ : Tendsto _ _ (𝓝 (1 : ℂ))) one_ne_zero
rw [(by simp : (1 : ℂ) = Real.exp (-0))]
exact (continuous_ofReal.comp (Real.continuous_exp.comp continuous_neg)).continuousWithinAt
#align complex.has_deriv_at_Gamma_integral Complex.hasDerivAt_GammaIntegral
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 447 | 464 | theorem differentiableAt_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : 1 - s.re < n) (h2 : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (GammaAux n) s := by |
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· refine (hasDerivAt_GammaIntegral ?_).differentiableAt
rw [Nat.cast_zero] at h1; linarith
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
specialize hn (s + 1)
have a : 1 - (s + 1).re < ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ] at h1; rw [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re]; linarith
have b : ∀ m : ℕ, s + 1 ≠ -m := by
intro m; have := h2 (1 + m)
contrapose! this
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at this
simpa using this
refine DifferentiableAt.div (DifferentiableAt.comp _ (hn a b) ?_) ?_ ?_
· rw [differentiableAt_add_const_iff (1 : ℂ)]; exact differentiableAt_id
· exact differentiableAt_id
· simpa using h2 0
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
/-!
# Restricting a measure to a subset or a subtype
Given a measure `μ` on a type `α` and a subset `s` of `α`, we define a measure `μ.restrict s` as
the restriction of `μ` to `s` (still as a measure on `α`).
We investigate how this notion interacts with usual operations on measures (sum, pushforward,
pullback), and on sets (inclusion, union, Union).
We also study the relationship between the restriction of a measure to a subtype (given by the
pullback under `Subtype.val`) and the restriction to a set as above.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter MeasurableSpace ENNReal Function
variable {R α β δ γ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ℝ≥0∞`-linear map. -/
noncomputable def restrictₗ {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.restrict s) fun μ s' hs' t => by
suffices μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ ((s ∩ t) \ s') by
simpa [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc]
exact le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _
#align measure_theory.measure.restrictₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrictₗ
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
noncomputable def restrict {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Measure α :=
restrictₗ s μ
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict
@[simp]
theorem restrictₗ_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.restrictₗ_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.restrictₗ_apply
/-- This lemma shows that `restrict` and `toOuterMeasure` commute. Note that the LHS has a
restrict on measures and the RHS has a restrict on outer measures. -/
theorem restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict (h : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict s).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.restrict s μ.toOuterMeasure := by
simp_rw [restrict, restrictₗ, liftLinear, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
toMeasure_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.restrict_trim h, μ.trimmed]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_to_outer_measure_eq_to_outer_measure_restrict MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict
theorem restrict_apply₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.restrict s)) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, liftLinear_apply₀ _ ht, OuterMeasure.restrict_apply,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply₀
/-- If `t` is a measurable set, then the measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. An alternate version requiring that `s`
be measurable instead of `t` exists as `Measure.restrict_apply'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
restrict_apply₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
theorem restrict_mono' {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hs : s ≤ᵐ[μ] s')
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s') := (measure_mono_ae <| hs.mono fun _x hx ⟨hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨hxt, hx hxs⟩)
_ ≤ ν (t ∩ s') := le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
_ = ν.restrict s' t := (restrict_apply ht).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_mono' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_mono'
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono]
theorem restrict_mono {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
restrict_mono' (ae_of_all _ hs) hμν
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_mono
theorem restrict_mono_ae (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono' h (le_refl μ)
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_mono_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_mono_ae
theorem restrict_congr_set (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae h.le) (restrict_mono_ae h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_congr_set MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_congr_set
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then the outer measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. This is an alternate version of
`Measure.restrict_apply`, requiring that `s` is measurable instead of `t`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_apply,
Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict hs,
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply s t _, toOuterMeasure_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply'
theorem restrict_apply₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq,
restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_congr ((ae_eq_refl t).inter hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq)]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply₀' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply₀'
theorem restrict_le_self : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_le_self MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_le_self
variable (μ)
theorem restrict_eq_self (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict t s = μ s :=
(le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self s).antisymm <|
calc
μ s ≤ μ (toMeasurable (μ.restrict t) s ∩ t) :=
measure_mono (subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable _ _) h)
_ = μ.restrict t s := by
rw [← restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), measure_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_eq_self MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply_self (s : Set α) : (μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
restrict_eq_self μ Subset.rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_self MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply_self
variable {μ}
theorem restrict_apply_univ (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s := by
rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply_univ
theorem le_restrict_apply (s t : Set α) : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
calc
μ (t ∩ s) = μ.restrict s (t ∩ s) := (restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ μ.restrict s t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
#align measure_theory.measure.le_restrict_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_restrict_apply
theorem restrict_apply_le (s t : Set α) : μ.restrict s t ≤ μ t :=
Measure.le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self _
theorem restrict_apply_superset (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict s t = μ s :=
((measure_mono (subset_univ _)).trans_eq <| restrict_apply_univ _).antisymm
((restrict_apply_self μ s).symm.trans_le <| measure_mono h)
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_superset MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply_superset
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_add MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_add
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : (0 : Measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_zero
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_smul c μ
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_smul
theorem restrict_restrict₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.restrict t)) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by
simp only [Set.inter_assoc, restrict_apply hu,
restrict_apply₀ (hu.nullMeasurableSet.inter hs)]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_restrict₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_restrict₀
@[simp]
theorem restrict_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_restrict MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_restrict
theorem restrict_restrict_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
rw [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply hu, restrict_eq_self]
exact inter_subset_right.trans h
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset
theorem restrict_restrict₀' (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by simp only [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply₀' ht, inter_assoc]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_restrict₀' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_restrict₀'
theorem restrict_restrict' (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀' ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_restrict' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_restrict'
theorem restrict_comm (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).restrict t := by
rw [restrict_restrict hs, restrict_restrict' hs, inter_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_comm MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_comm
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply ht]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply_eq_zero
theorem measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict (h : μ.restrict s t = 0) : μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply' hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_zero : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_eq_zero
/-- If `μ s ≠ 0`, then `μ.restrict s ≠ 0`, in terms of `NeZero` instances. -/
instance restrict.neZero [NeZero (μ s)] : NeZero (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨mt restrict_eq_zero.mp <| NeZero.ne _⟩
theorem restrict_zero_set {s : Set α} (h : μ s = 0) : μ.restrict s = 0 :=
restrict_eq_zero.2 h
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_zero_set MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_zero_set
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
restrict_zero_set measure_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_univ
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, ← inter_assoc, diff_eq]
exact measure_inter_add_diff₀ (u ∩ s) ht
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_inter_add_diff₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_inter_add_diff₀
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s :=
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_inter_add_diff
theorem restrict_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [← restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union_add_inter₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union_add_inter₀
theorem restrict_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union_add_inter MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union_add_inter
theorem restrict_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simpa only [union_comm, inter_comm, add_comm] using restrict_union_add_inter t hs
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union_add_inter' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union_add_inter'
theorem restrict_union₀ (h : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simp [← restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht, restrict_zero_set h]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union₀
theorem restrict_union (h : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union₀ h.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union
theorem restrict_union' (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [union_comm, restrict_union h.symm hs, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union' MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union'
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ := by
rw [← restrict_union (@disjoint_compl_right (Set α) _ _) hs.compl, union_compl_self,
restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_add_restrict_compl MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_add_restrict_compl
@[simp]
theorem restrict_compl_add_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ := by
rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_compl_add_restrict MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_compl_add_restrict
theorem restrict_union_le (s s' : Set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by
simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left] using measure_union_le (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union_le
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_iUnion]
exact
measure_iUnion₀ (hd.mono fun i j h => h.mono inter_subset_right inter_subset_right)
fun i => ht.nullMeasurableSet.inter (hm i)
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_apply_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_iUnion_apply_ae
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd.aedisjoint (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) ht
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_iUnion_apply
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_iUnion]
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup]
exacts [hd.mono_comp _ fun s₁ s₂ => inter_subset_inter_right _]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_apply_eq_supr MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup
/-- The restriction of the pushforward measure is the pushforward of the restriction. For a version
assuming only `AEMeasurable`, see `restrict_map_of_aemeasurable`. -/
theorem restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
ext fun t ht => by simp [*, hf ht]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_map MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_map
theorem restrict_toMeasurable (h : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_inter ht h,
inter_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_to_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_toMeasurable
theorem restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃μ : Measure α⦄
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) : μ.restrict s = μ :=
calc
μ.restrict s = μ.restrict univ := restrict_congr_set (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr hs)
_ = μ := restrict_univ
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem
theorem restrict_congr_meas (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨fun H t hts ht => by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht], fun H =>
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ inter_subset_right (ht.inter hs)]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_congr_meas MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_congr_meas
theorem restrict_congr_mono (hs : s ⊆ t) (h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [← restrict_restrict_of_subset hs, h, restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_congr_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_congr_mono
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem restrict_union_congr :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨restrict_congr_mono subset_union_left h,
restrict_congr_mono subset_union_right h⟩,
?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left]
rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ ν (u ∩ s) with ⟨US, hsub, hm, hμ, hν⟩
calc
μ (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) = μ (US ∪ u ∩ t) :=
measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hμ.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
_ = μ US + μ ((u ∩ t) \ US) := (measure_add_diff hm _).symm
_ = restrict μ s u + restrict μ t (u \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hμ, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = restrict ν s u + restrict ν t (u \ US) := by rw [hs, ht]
_ = ν US + ν ((u ∩ t) \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hν, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = ν (US ∪ u ∩ t) := measure_add_diff hm _
_ = ν (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := Eq.symm <| measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hν.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_union_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_union_congr
theorem restrict_finset_biUnion_congr {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs; · simp
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left, Finset.mem_insert]
rw [restrict_union_congr, ← hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_finset_bUnion_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_finset_biUnion_congr
theorem restrict_iUnion_congr [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => restrict_congr_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) h, fun h => ?_⟩
ext1 t ht
have D : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun t : Finset ι => ⋃ i ∈ t, s i :=
Monotone.directed_le fun t₁ t₂ ht => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset]
simp only [restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup D ht, restrict_finset_biUnion_congr.2 fun i _ => h i]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_iUnion_congr
theorem restrict_biUnion_congr {s : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (hc : s.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall', restrict_iUnion_congr]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_bUnion_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_biUnion_congr
theorem restrict_sUnion_congr {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, restrict_biUnion_congr hc]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_sUnion_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_sUnion_congr
/-- This lemma shows that `Inf` and `restrict` commute for measures. -/
theorem restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m : Set (Measure α)}
(hm : m.Nonempty) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(sInf m).restrict t = sInf ((fun μ : Measure α => μ.restrict t) '' m) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sInf_apply hs, restrict_apply hs, sInf_apply (MeasurableSet.inter hs ht),
Set.image_image, restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict ht, ←
Set.image_image _ toOuterMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict _ (hm.image _),
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Inf_eq_Inf_restrict MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict
theorem exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae (hs : μ s ≠ 0) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
rw [← μ.restrict_apply_self, ← frequently_ae_mem_iff] at hs
exact (hs.and_eventually hp).exists
#align measure_theory.measure.exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ⋃ i, s i = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_congr, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_iff_of_Union_eq_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Union_eq_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `biUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ {S : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hc : S.Countable)
(hs : ⋃ i ∈ S, s i = univ) : μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_biUnion_congr hc, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_iff_of_bUnion_eq_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_bUnion_eq_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hs : ⋃₀ S = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ hc <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(hc : T.Countable) (h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t ≠ ∞)
(ST_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, ∀ s ∈ S, μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hU fun t ht => ?_
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu]
refine induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter ?_ (ST_eq t ht) ?_ ?_ hu
· simp only [Set.empty_inter, measure_empty]
· intro v hv hvt
have := T_eq t ht
rw [Set.inter_comm] at hvt ⊢
rwa [← measure_inter_add_diff t hv, ← measure_inter_add_diff t hv, ← hvt,
ENNReal.add_right_inj] at this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (htop t ht) (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)
· intro f hfd hfm h_eq
simp only [← restrict_apply (hfm _), ← restrict_apply (MeasurableSet.iUnion hfm)] at h_eq ⊢
simp only [measure_iUnion hfd hfm, h_eq]
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_generate_from_of_cover MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `sUnion`. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (h_sub : T ⊆ S) (hc : T.Countable) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ)
(htop : ∀ s ∈ T, μ s ≠ ∞) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover h_gen hc h_inter hU htop ?_ fun t ht => h_eq t (h_sub ht)
intro t ht s hs; rcases (s ∩ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with H | H
· simp only [H, measure_empty]
· exact h_eq _ (h_inter _ hs _ (h_sub ht) H)
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_generate_from_of_cover_subset MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `iUnion`.
`FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ext` is a reformulation of this lemma. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion (C : Set (Set α)) (B : ℕ → Set α) (hA : ‹_› = generateFrom C)
(hC : IsPiSystem C) (h1B : ⋃ i, B i = univ) (h2B : ∀ i, B i ∈ C) (hμB : ∀ i, μ (B i) ≠ ∞)
(h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset hA hC ?_ (countable_range B) h1B ?_ h_eq
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply h2B
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply hμB
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_of_generate_from_of_Union MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ht, ht.inter hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_sum
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum_of_countable [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s := by
ext t ht
simp_rw [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_apply ht, sum_apply_of_countable]
lemma AbsolutelyContinuous.restrict (h : μ ≪ ν) (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s ≪ ν.restrict s := by
refine Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk (fun t ht htν ↦ ?_)
rw [restrict_apply ht] at htν ⊢
exact h htν
theorem restrict_iUnion_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd hm ht]
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_iUnion_ae
theorem restrict_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
restrict_iUnion_ae hd.aedisjoint fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_iUnion
theorem restrict_iUnion_le [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ≤ sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by simpa [ht, inter_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_le (t ∩ s ·)
#align measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_iUnion_le
end Measure
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_eq [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) = ⨆ i, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
le_antisymm ((ae_sum_eq fun i => μ.restrict (s i)) ▸ ae_mono restrict_iUnion_le) <|
iSup_le fun i => ae_mono <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion s i) le_rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_Union_eq MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_iUnion_eq
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_union_eq (s t : Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) = ae (μ.restrict s) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict t) := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq]
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_union_eq MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_union_eq
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_eq (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, ← iSup_subtype'']
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_bUnion_eq MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_biUnion_eq
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s t.countable_toSet
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_bUnion_finset_eq MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by simp
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_Union_iff MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_iUnion_iff
theorem ae_restrict_union_iff (s t : Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s ∪ t), p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_union_iff MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_union_iff
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, mem_iSup]
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_bUnion_iff MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_biUnion_iff
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq s, mem_iSup]
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_bUnion_finset_iff MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, eventually_iSup]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_restrict_Union_iff MeasureTheory.ae_eq_restrict_iUnion_iff
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, EventuallyEq, eventually_iSup]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_restrict_bUnion_iff MeasureTheory.ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g :=
ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff s t.countable_toSet f g
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_restrict_bUnion_finset_iff MeasureTheory.ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_eq [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) :
ae (μ.restrict (Ι a b)) = ae (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, ae_restrict_union_eq]
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_uIoc_eq MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_eq
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), P x) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc a b), P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc b a), P x := by
rw [ae_restrict_uIoc_eq, eventually_sup]
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff
theorem ae_restrict_iff₀ {p : α → Prop} (hp : NullMeasurableSet { x | p x } (μ.restrict s)) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, Measure.restrict_apply₀ hp.compl]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff {p : α → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff₀ hp.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_iff MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_iff
theorem ae_imp_of_ae_restrict {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff] at h ⊢
simpa [setOf_and, inter_comm] using measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict h
#align measure_theory.ae_imp_of_ae_restrict MeasureTheory.ae_imp_of_ae_restrict
theorem ae_restrict_iff'₀ {p : α → Prop} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, restrict_apply₀' hs]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_iff'₀ MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_iff'₀
theorem ae_restrict_iff' {p : α → Prop} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_iff' MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_iff'
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.restrict {f g : α → δ} {s : Set α} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g := by
-- note that we cannot use `ae_restrict_iff` since we do not require measurability
refine hfg.filter_mono ?_
rw [Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous]
exact Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le Measure.restrict_le_self
#align filter.eventually_eq.restrict Filter.EventuallyEq.restrict
theorem ae_restrict_mem₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
(ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs).2 (Filter.eventually_of_forall fun _ => id)
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_mem₀ MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_mem₀
theorem ae_restrict_mem (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
ae_restrict_mem₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_mem MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_mem
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono Measure.restrict_le_self)
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_of_ae MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_of_ae
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset {s t : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono <| Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ))
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset
theorem ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl (t : Set α) {p : α → Prop}
(ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) (htc : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict tᶜ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <|
calc
μ { x | ¬p x } ≤ μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ t) + μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ tᶜ) :=
measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ.restrict t { x | ¬p x } + μ.restrict tᶜ { x | ¬p x } :=
add_le_add (le_restrict_apply _ _) (le_restrict_apply _ _)
_ = 0 := by rw [ae_iff.1 ht, ae_iff.1 htc, zero_add]
#align measure_theory.ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl MeasureTheory.ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl
theorem mem_map_restrict_ae_iff {β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map f (ae (μ.restrict s)) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply' hs]
#align measure_theory.mem_map_restrict_ae_iff MeasureTheory.mem_map_restrict_ae_iff
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, smul_zero]
#align measure_theory.ae_smul_measure MeasureTheory.ae_smul_measure
theorem ae_add_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {ν} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ + ν, p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, p x :=
add_eq_zero_iff
#align measure_theory.ae_add_measure_iff MeasureTheory.ae_add_measure_iff
theorem ae_eq_comp' {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') (h2 : μ.map f ≪ ν) : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
(tendsto_ae_map hf).mono_right h2.ae_le h
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_comp' MeasureTheory.ae_eq_comp'
theorem Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq_comp {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) (h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf.aemeasurable h hf.absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae_eq_comp MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq_comp
theorem ae_eq_comp {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h : g =ᵐ[μ.map f] g') :
g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf h AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_comp MeasureTheory.ae_eq_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ae_eq_one {β} [Group β] (f g : α → β) : f / g =ᵐ[μ] 1 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one] at hx
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one]
#align measure_theory.sub_ae_eq_zero MeasureTheory.sub_ae_eq_zero
@[to_additive sub_nonneg_ae]
lemma one_le_div_ae {β : Type*} [Group β] [LE β]
[CovariantClass β β (Function.swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (f g : α → β) :
1 ≤ᵐ[μ] g / f ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div'] at ha
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div']
theorem le_ae_restrict : ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ ae (μ.restrict s) := fun _s hs =>
eventually_inf_principal.2 (ae_imp_of_ae_restrict hs)
#align measure_theory.le_ae_restrict MeasureTheory.le_ae_restrict
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ae (μ.restrict s) = ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext t
simp only [mem_inf_principal, mem_ae_iff, restrict_apply_eq_zero' hs, compl_setOf,
Classical.not_imp, fun a => and_comm (a := a ∈ s) (b := ¬a ∈ t)]
rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_eq MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_eq
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem ae_restrict_eq_bot {s} : ae (μ.restrict s) = ⊥ ↔ μ s = 0 :=
ae_eq_bot.trans restrict_eq_zero
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_eq_bot MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_eq_bot
theorem ae_restrict_neBot {s} : (ae <| μ.restrict s).NeBot ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans ae_restrict_eq_bot.not
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_ne_bot MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_neBot
theorem self_mem_ae_restrict {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : s ∈ ae (μ.restrict s) := by
simp only [ae_restrict_eq hs, exists_prop, mem_principal, mem_inf_iff]
exact ⟨_, univ_mem, s, Subset.rfl, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align measure_theory.self_mem_ae_restrict MeasureTheory.self_mem_ae_restrict
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp [Measure.restrict_congr_set hst]
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_congr_set {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x :=
⟨ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst, ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst.symm⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_restrict_congr_set MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_congr_set
/-- A version of the **Borel-Cantelli lemma**: if `pᵢ` is a sequence of predicates such that
`∑ μ {x | pᵢ x}` is finite, then the measure of `x` such that `pᵢ x` holds frequently as `i → ∞` (or
equivalently, `pᵢ x` holds for infinitely many `i`) is equal to zero. -/
theorem measure_setOf_frequently_eq_zero {p : ℕ → α → Prop} (hp : ∑' i, μ { x | p i x } ≠ ∞) :
μ { x | ∃ᶠ n in atTop, p n x } = 0 := by
simpa only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, frequently_atTop, ← bex_def, setOf_forall,
setOf_exists] using measure_limsup_eq_zero hp
#align measure_theory.measure_set_of_frequently_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_setOf_frequently_eq_zero
/-- A version of the **Borel-Cantelli lemma**: if `sᵢ` is a sequence of sets such that
`∑ μ sᵢ` exists, then for almost all `x`, `x` does not belong to almost all `sᵢ`. -/
theorem ae_eventually_not_mem {s : ℕ → Set α} (hs : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, x ∉ s n :=
measure_setOf_frequently_eq_zero hs
#align measure_theory.ae_eventually_not_mem MeasureTheory.ae_eventually_not_mem
lemma NullMeasurable.measure_preimage_eq_measure_restrict_preimage_of_ae_compl_eq_const
{β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {b : β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(f_mble : NullMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hs : f =ᵐ[Measure.restrict μ sᶜ] (fun _ ↦ b))
{t : Set β} (t_mble : MeasurableSet t) (ht : b ∉ t) :
μ (f ⁻¹' t) = μ.restrict s (f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [Measure.restrict_apply₀ (f_mble t_mble)]
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply₀] at hs
· apply le_antisymm _ (measure_mono inter_subset_left)
apply (measure_mono (Eq.symm (inter_union_compl (f ⁻¹' t) s)).le).trans
apply (measure_union_le _ _).trans
have obs : μ ((f ⁻¹' t) ∩ sᶜ) = 0 := by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
rw [← hs]
apply measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ _)
intro x hx hfx
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_setOf_eq] at hx hfx
exact ht (hfx ▸ hx)
simp only [obs, add_zero, le_refl]
· exact NullMeasurableSet.of_null hs
namespace Measure
section Subtype
/-! ### Subtype of a measure space -/
section ComapAnyMeasure
theorem MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) : NullMeasurableSet ((↑) '' t) μ := by
rw [Subtype.instMeasurableSpace, comap_eq_generateFrom] at ht
refine
generateFrom_induction (p := fun t : Set s => NullMeasurableSet ((↑) '' t) μ)
{ t : Set s | ∃ s' : Set α, MeasurableSet s' ∧ (↑) ⁻¹' s' = t } ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ht
· rintro t' ⟨s', hs', rfl⟩
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter (hs'.nullMeasurableSet)
· simp only [image_empty, nullMeasurableSet_empty]
· intro t'
simp only [← range_diff_image Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
exact hs.diff
· intro f
dsimp only []
rw [image_iUnion]
exact NullMeasurableSet.iUnion
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_set.null_measurable_set_subtype_coe MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe
theorem NullMeasurableSet.subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.comap Subtype.val)) : NullMeasurableSet (((↑) : s → α) '' t) μ :=
NullMeasurableSet.image (↑) μ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun _ => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) ht
#align measure_theory.measure.null_measurable_set.subtype_coe MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurableSet.subtype_coe
theorem measure_subtype_coe_le_comap (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set s) :
μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) ≤ μ.comap Subtype.val t :=
le_comap_apply _ _ Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) _
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_subtype_coe_le_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_subtype_coe_le_comap
theorem measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) {t : Set s}
(ht : μ.comap Subtype.val t = 0) : μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) = 0 :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr <| (measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hs t).trans ht.le
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero
end ComapAnyMeasure
section MeasureSpace
variable {u : Set δ} [MeasureSpace δ] {p : δ → Prop}
/-- In a measure space, one can restrict the measure to a subtype to get a new measure space.
Not registered as an instance, as there are other natural choices such as the normalized restriction
for a probability measure, or the subspace measure when restricting to a vector subspace. Enable
locally if needed with `attribute [local instance] Measure.Subtype.measureSpace`. -/
noncomputable def Subtype.measureSpace : MeasureSpace (Subtype p) where
volume := Measure.comap Subtype.val volume
#align measure_theory.measure.subtype.measure_space MeasureTheory.Measure.Subtype.measureSpace
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem Subtype.volume_def : (volume : Measure u) = volume.comap Subtype.val :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.subtype.volume_def MeasureTheory.Measure.Subtype.volume_def
theorem Subtype.volume_univ (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) : volume (univ : Set u) = volume u := by
rw [Subtype.volume_def, comap_apply₀ _ _ _ _ MeasurableSet.univ.nullMeasurableSet]
· congr
simp only [image_univ, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
· exact Subtype.coe_injective
· exact fun t => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hu
#align measure_theory.measure.subtype.volume_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.Subtype.volume_univ
theorem volume_subtype_coe_le_volume (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) (t : Set u) :
volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) ≤ volume t :=
measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hu t
#align measure_theory.measure.volume_subtype_coe_le_volume MeasureTheory.Measure.volume_subtype_coe_le_volume
theorem volume_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_volume_eq_zero (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) {t : Set u}
(ht : volume t = 0) : volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) = 0 :=
measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero hu ht
#align measure_theory.measure.volume_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_volume_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.volume_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_volume_eq_zero
end MeasureSpace
end Subtype
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory Measure
namespace MeasurableEmbedding
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m1 : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
theorem map_comap (μ : Measure β) : (comap f μ).map f = μ.restrict (range f) := by
ext1 t ht
rw [hf.map_apply, comap_apply f hf.injective hf.measurableSet_image' _ (hf.measurable ht),
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
#align measurable_embedding.map_comap MeasurableEmbedding.map_comap
theorem comap_apply (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
calc
comap f μ s = comap f μ (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := by rw [hf.injective.preimage_image]
_ = (comap f μ).map f (f '' s) := (hf.map_apply _ _).symm
_ = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (image_subset_range _ _)]
#align measurable_embedding.comap_apply MeasurableEmbedding.comap_apply
theorem comap_map (μ : Measure α) : (map f μ).comap f = μ := by
ext t _
rw [hf.comap_apply, hf.map_apply, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
theorem ae_map_iff {p : β → Prop} {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.map f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x) := by
simp only [ae_iff, hf.map_apply, preimage_setOf_eq]
#align measurable_embedding.ae_map_iff MeasurableEmbedding.ae_map_iff
theorem restrict_map (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
Measure.ext fun t ht => by simp [hf.map_apply, ht, hf.measurable ht]
#align measurable_embedding.restrict_map MeasurableEmbedding.restrict_map
protected theorem comap_preimage (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [← hf.map_apply, hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range]
#align measurable_embedding.comap_preimage MeasurableEmbedding.comap_preimage
lemma comap_restrict (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
(μ.restrict s).comap f = (μ.comap f).restrict (f ⁻¹' s) := by
ext t ht
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht, comap_apply hf, comap_apply hf,
Measure.restrict_apply (hf.measurableSet_image.2 ht), image_inter_preimage]
lemma restrict_comap (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) :
(μ.comap f).restrict s = (μ.restrict (f '' s)).comap f := by
rw [comap_restrict hf, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEquiv.restrict_map (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map e).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| e ⁻¹' s).map e :=
e.measurableEmbedding.restrict_map _ _
#align measurable_equiv.restrict_map MeasurableEquiv.restrict_map
end MeasurableEmbedding
section Subtype
theorem comap_subtype_coe_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) (t : Set s) : comap (↑) μ t = μ ((↑) '' t) :=
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).comap_apply _ _
#align comap_subtype_coe_apply comap_subtype_coe_apply
theorem map_comap_subtype_coe {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) : (comap (↑) μ).map ((↑) : s → α) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
#align map_comap_subtype_coe map_comap_subtype_coe
theorem ae_restrict_iff_subtype {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ (x : s) ∂comap ((↑) : s → α) μ, p x := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).ae_map_iff]
#align ae_restrict_iff_subtype ae_restrict_iff_subtype
variable [MeasureSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-!
### Volume on `s : Set α`
Note the instance is provided earlier as `Subtype.measureSpace`.
-/
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
#align set_coe.measure_space MeasureTheory.Measure.Subtype.measureSpace
theorem volume_set_coe_def (s : Set α) : (volume : Measure s) = comap ((↑) : s → α) volume :=
rfl
#align volume_set_coe_def volume_set_coe_def
theorem MeasurableSet.map_coe_volume {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
volume.map ((↑) : s → α) = restrict volume s := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap volume, Subtype.range_coe]
#align measurable_set.map_coe_volume MeasurableSet.map_coe_volume
theorem volume_image_subtype_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set s) :
volume ((↑) '' t : Set α) = volume t :=
(comap_subtype_coe_apply hs volume t).symm
#align volume_image_subtype_coe volume_image_subtype_coe
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_coe (hs : NullMeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
volume (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = volume (t ∩ s) := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def,
comap_apply₀ _ _ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun h => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs)
(measurable_subtype_coe ht).nullMeasurableSet,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align volume_preimage_coe volume_preimage_coe
end Subtype
section Piecewise
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f g : α → β}
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs]
exact (piecewise_eqOn s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
#align piecewise_ae_eq_restrict piecewise_ae_eq_restrict
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] g := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs.compl]
exact (piecewise_eqOn_compl s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
#align piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)]
(hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.piecewise f g =ᵐ[μ] t.piecewise f g :=
hst.mem_iff.mono fun x hx => by simp [piecewise, hx]
#align piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set
end Piecewise
section IndicatorFunction
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f : α → β}
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem [Zero β] {t : Set β}
(ht : (0 : β) ∈ t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ t ∈ Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) := by
classical
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply' hs, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite]
simp_rw [Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0
simp only [ht, ← Set.compl_eq_univ_diff, compl_compl, Set.compl_union, if_true,
Set.preimage_const]
simp_rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right, Set.compl_inter_self s, Set.union_empty]
#align mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem [Zero β] {t : Set β} (ht : (0 : β) ∉ t) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0 := by
classical
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite, Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0
simp only [ht, if_false, Set.compl_empty, Set.empty_diff, Set.inter_univ, Set.preimage_const]
#align mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem
theorem map_restrict_ae_le_map_indicator_ae [Zero β] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) ≤ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) := by
intro t
by_cases ht : (0 : β) ∈ t
· rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem ht hs]
exact id
rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem ht, mem_map_restrict_ae_iff hs]
exact fun h => measure_mono_null (Set.inter_subset_left.trans Set.subset_union_left) h
#align map_restrict_ae_le_map_indicator_ae map_restrict_ae_le_map_indicator_ae
variable [Zero β]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
#align indicator_ae_eq_restrict indicator_ae_eq_restrict
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs
#align indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Restrict.lean | 1,067 | 1,073 | theorem indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] f := by |
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs.compl] at hf
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp only [hx hxs, Pi.zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Quotient
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Polish
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Floor
#align_import measure_theory.integral.periodic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# Integrals of periodic functions
In this file we prove that the half-open interval `Ioc t (t + T)` in `ℝ` is a fundamental domain of
the action of the subgroup `ℤ ∙ T` on `ℝ`.
A consequence is `AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk`: the covering map from `ℝ` to the "additive
circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` is measure-preserving, with respect to the restriction of Lebesgue measure to
`Ioc t (t + T)` (upstairs) and with respect to Haar measure (downstairs).
Another consequence (`Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq` and related declarations) is that
`∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x` for any (not necessarily measurable) function with
period `T`.
-/
open Set Function MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace AddSubgroup intervalIntegral
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
@[measurability]
protected theorem AddCircle.measurable_mk' {a : ℝ} :
Measurable (β := AddCircle a) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle a) :=
Continuous.measurable <| AddCircle.continuous_mk' a
#align add_circle.measurable_mk' AddCircle.measurable_mk'
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ)
(μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine this.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa only [add_comm x] using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine (AddSubgroup.equivOp _).bijective.comp this |>.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc' isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc'
namespace AddCircle
variable (T : ℝ) [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- Equip the "additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` with, as a standard measure, the Haar measure of total
mass `T` -/
noncomputable instance measureSpace : MeasureSpace (AddCircle T) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.measurableSpace _ with volume := ENNReal.ofReal T • addHaarMeasure ⊤ }
#align add_circle.measure_space AddCircle.measureSpace
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
protected theorem measure_univ : volume (Set.univ : Set (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T := by
dsimp [volume]
rw [← PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
simp [addHaarMeasure_self (G := AddCircle T), -PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
#align add_circle.measure_univ AddCircle.measure_univ
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) :=
IsAddHaarMeasure.smul _ (by simp [hT.out]) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
instance isFiniteMeasure : IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by simp
#align add_circle.is_finite_measure AddCircle.isFiniteMeasure
instance : HasAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) ℝ where
ExistsIsAddFundamentalDomain := ⟨Ioc 0 (0 + T), isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' Fact.out 0⟩
instance : AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage volume (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) := by
apply MeasureTheory.leftInvariantIsAddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
simp [(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out 0).covolume_eq_volume, AddCircle.measure_univ]
/-- The covering map from `ℝ` to the "additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` is measure-preserving,
considered with respect to the standard measure (defined to be the Haar measure of total mass `T`)
on the additive circle, and with respect to the restriction of Lebsegue measure on `ℝ` to an
interval (t, t + T]. -/
protected theorem measurePreserving_mk (t : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (β := AddCircle T) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T)
(volume.restrict (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
measurePreserving_quotientAddGroup_mk_of_AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
volume (𝓕 := Ioc t (t+T)) (isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _) _
#align add_circle.measure_preserving_mk AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk
lemma add_projection_respects_measure (t : ℝ) {U : Set (AddCircle T)} (meas_U : MeasurableSet U) :
volume U = volume (QuotientAddGroup.mk ⁻¹' U ∩ (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _).addProjection_respects_measure_apply
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) meas_U
theorem volume_closedBall {x : AddCircle T} (ε : ℝ) :
volume (Metric.closedBall x ε) = ENNReal.ofReal (min T (2 * ε)) := by
have hT' : |T| = T := abs_eq_self.mpr hT.out.le
let I := Ioc (-(T / 2)) (T / 2)
have h₁ : ε < T / 2 → Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε ∩ I = Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε := by
intro hε
rw [inter_eq_left, Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_sub, zero_add]
rintro y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; constructor <;> linarith
have h₂ : (↑) ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (0 : AddCircle T) ε ∩ I =
if ε < T / 2 then Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε else I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← if_ctx_congr (Iff.rfl : ε < T / 2 ↔ ε < T / 2) h₁ fun _ => rfl, ← hT']
apply coe_real_preimage_closedBall_inter_eq
simpa only [hT', Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_add, zero_sub] using Ioc_subset_Icc_self
rw [addHaar_closedBall_center, add_projection_respects_measure T (-(T/2))
measurableSet_closedBall, (by linarith : -(T / 2) + T = T / 2), h₂]
by_cases hε : ε < T / 2
· simp [hε, min_eq_right (by linarith : 2 * ε ≤ T)]
· simp [I, hε, min_eq_left (by linarith : T ≤ 2 * ε)]
#align add_circle.volume_closed_ball AddCircle.volume_closedBall
instance : IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) := by
refine ⟨⟨Real.toNNReal 2, Filter.eventually_of_forall fun ε x => ?_⟩⟩
simp only [volume_closedBall]
erw [← ENNReal.ofReal_mul zero_le_two]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
rw [mul_min_of_nonneg _ _ (zero_le_two : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2)]
exact min_le_min (by linarith [hT.out]) (le_refl _)
/-- The isomorphism `AddCircle T ≃ Ioc a (a + T)` whose inverse is the natural quotient map,
as an equivalence of measurable spaces. -/
noncomputable def measurableEquivIoc (a : ℝ) : AddCircle T ≃ᵐ Ioc a (a + T) where
toEquiv := equivIoc T a
measurable_toFun := measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mp <| ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun _x hx =>
continuousAt_equivIoc T a hx).measurable
measurable_invFun := AddCircle.measurable_mk'.comp measurable_subtype_coe
#align add_circle.measurable_equiv_Ioc AddCircle.measurableEquivIoc
/-- The isomorphism `AddCircle T ≃ Ico a (a + T)` whose inverse is the natural quotient map,
as an equivalence of measurable spaces. -/
noncomputable def measurableEquivIco (a : ℝ) : AddCircle T ≃ᵐ Ico a (a + T) where
toEquiv := equivIco T a
measurable_toFun := measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mp <| ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun _x hx =>
continuousAt_equivIco T a hx).measurable
measurable_invFun := AddCircle.measurable_mk'.comp measurable_subtype_coe
#align add_circle.measurable_equiv_Ico AddCircle.measurableEquivIco
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace in
/-- The lower integral of a function over `AddCircle T` is equal to the lower integral over an
interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem lintegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a in Ioc t (t + T), f a) = ∫⁻ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
have m : MeasurableSet (Ioc t (t + T)) := measurableSet_Ioc
have := lintegral_map_equiv (μ := volume) f (measurableEquivIoc T t).symm
simp only [measurableEquivIoc, equivIoc, QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk,
MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk] at this
rw [← (AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk T t).map_eq]
convert this.symm using 1
· rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe m _]
exact MeasurableEmbedding.lintegral_map (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe m) _
· congr 1
have : ((↑) : Ioc t (t + T) → AddCircle T) = ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T) ∘ ((↑) : _ → ℝ) := by
ext1 x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [← map_map AddCircle.measurable_mk' measurable_subtype_coe, ← map_comap_subtype_coe m]
rfl
#align add_circle.lintegral_preimage AddCircle.lintegral_preimage
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace in
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `AddCircle T` is equal
to the integral over an interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem integral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → E) :
(∫ a in Ioc t (t + T), f a) = ∫ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
have m : MeasurableSet (Ioc t (t + T)) := measurableSet_Ioc
have := integral_map_equiv (μ := volume) (measurableEquivIoc T t).symm f
simp only [measurableEquivIoc, equivIoc, QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk,
MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk] at this
rw [← (AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk T t).map_eq, ← integral_subtype m, ← this]
have : ((↑) : Ioc t (t + T) → AddCircle T) = ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T) ∘ ((↑) : _ → ℝ) := by
ext1 x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [← map_map AddCircle.measurable_mk' measurable_subtype_coe, ← map_comap_subtype_coe m]
rfl
#align add_circle.integral_preimage AddCircle.integral_preimage
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `AddCircle T` is equal
to the integral over an interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem intervalIntegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → E) :
∫ a in t..t + T, f a = ∫ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
rw [integral_of_le, AddCircle.integral_preimage T t f]
linarith [hT.out]
#align add_circle.interval_integral_preimage AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage
end AddCircle
namespace UnitAddCircle
attribute [local instance] Real.fact_zero_lt_one
protected theorem measure_univ : volume (Set.univ : Set UnitAddCircle) = 1 := by simp
#align unit_add_circle.measure_univ UnitAddCircle.measure_univ
/-- The covering map from `ℝ` to the "unit additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ ℤ` is measure-preserving,
considered with respect to the standard measure (defined to be the Haar measure of total mass 1)
on the additive circle, and with respect to the restriction of Lebsegue measure on `ℝ` to an
interval (t, t + 1]. -/
protected theorem measurePreserving_mk (t : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (β := UnitAddCircle) ((↑) : ℝ → UnitAddCircle)
(volume.restrict (Ioc t (t + 1))) :=
AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk 1 t
#align unit_add_circle.measure_preserving_mk UnitAddCircle.measurePreserving_mk
/-- The integral of a measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is equal to the integral over an
interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem lintegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a in Ioc t (t + 1), f a) = ∫⁻ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.lintegral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.lintegral_preimage UnitAddCircle.lintegral_preimage
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is
equal to the integral over an interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem integral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → E) :
(∫ a in Ioc t (t + 1), f a) = ∫ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.integral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.integral_preimage UnitAddCircle.integral_preimage
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is
equal to the integral over an interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem intervalIntegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → E) :
∫ a in t..t + 1, f a = ∫ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.interval_integral_preimage UnitAddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage
end UnitAddCircle
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
namespace Function
namespace Periodic
variable {f : ℝ → E} {T : ℝ}
/-- An auxiliary lemma for a more general `Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq`. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos (hf : Periodic f T) (hT : 0 < T) (t s : ℝ) :
∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x := by
simp only [integral_of_le, hT.le, le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
haveI : VAddInvariantMeasure (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) ℝ volume :=
⟨fun c s _ => measure_preimage_add _ _ _⟩
apply IsAddFundamentalDomain.setIntegral_eq (G := AddSubgroup.zmultiples T)
exacts [isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc hT t, isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc hT s, hf.map_vadd_zmultiples]
#align function.periodic.interval_integral_add_eq_of_pos Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos
/-- If `f` is a periodic function with period `T`, then its integral over `[t, t + T]` does not
depend on `t`. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq (hf : Periodic f T) (t s : ℝ) :
∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) T with (hT | rfl | hT)
· exact hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos hT t s
· simp
· rw [← neg_inj, ← integral_symm, ← integral_symm]
simpa only [← sub_eq_add_neg, add_sub_cancel_right] using
hf.neg.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hT) (t + T) (s + T)
#align function.periodic.interval_integral_add_eq Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq
/-- If `f` is an integrable periodic function with period `T`, then its integral over `[t, s + T]`
is the sum of its integrals over the intervals `[t, s]` and `[t, t + T]`. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq_add (hf : Periodic f T) (t s : ℝ)
(h_int : ∀ t₁ t₂, IntervalIntegrable f MeasureSpace.volume t₁ t₂) :
∫ x in t..s + T, f x = (∫ x in t..s, f x) + ∫ x in t..t + T, f x := by
rw [hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq t s, integral_add_adjacent_intervals (h_int t s) (h_int s _)]
#align function.periodic.interval_integral_add_eq_add Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq_add
/-- If `f` is an integrable periodic function with period `T`, and `n` is an integer, then its
integral over `[t, t + n • T]` is `n` times its integral over `[t, t + T]`. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_add_zsmul_eq (hf : Periodic f T) (n : ℤ) (t : ℝ)
(h_int : ∀ t₁ t₂, IntervalIntegrable f MeasureSpace.volume t₁ t₂) :
∫ x in t..t + n • T, f x = n • ∫ x in t..t + T, f x := by
-- Reduce to the case `b = 0`
suffices (∫ x in (0)..(n • T), f x) = n • ∫ x in (0)..T, f x by
simp only [hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq t 0, (hf.zsmul n).intervalIntegral_add_eq t 0, zero_add,
this]
-- First prove it for natural numbers
have : ∀ m : ℕ, (∫ x in (0)..m • T, f x) = m • ∫ x in (0)..T, f x := fun m ↦ by
induction' m with m ih
· simp
· simp only [succ_nsmul, hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq_add 0 (m • T) h_int, ih, zero_add]
-- Then prove it for all integers
cases' n with n n
· simp [← this n]
· conv_rhs => rw [negSucc_zsmul]
have h₀ : Int.negSucc n • T + (n + 1) • T = 0 := by simp; linarith
rw [integral_symm, ← (hf.nsmul (n + 1)).funext, neg_inj]
simp_rw [integral_comp_add_right, h₀, zero_add, this (n + 1), add_comm T,
hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq ((n + 1) • T) 0, zero_add]
#align function.periodic.interval_integral_add_zsmul_eq Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_zsmul_eq
section RealValued
open Filter
variable {g : ℝ → ℝ}
variable (hg : Periodic g T) (h_int : ∀ t₁ t₂, IntervalIntegrable g MeasureSpace.volume t₁ t₂)
/-- If `g : ℝ → ℝ` is periodic with period `T > 0`, then for any `t : ℝ`, the function
`t ↦ ∫ x in 0..t, g x` is bounded below by `t ↦ X + ⌊t/T⌋ • Y` for appropriate constants `X` and
`Y`. -/
theorem sInf_add_zsmul_le_integral_of_pos (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ) :
(sInf ((fun t => ∫ x in (0)..t, g x) '' Icc 0 T) + ⌊t / T⌋ • ∫ x in (0)..T, g x) ≤
∫ x in (0)..t, g x := by
let ε := Int.fract (t / T) * T
conv_rhs =>
rw [← Int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq T t (by linarith), ←
integral_add_adjacent_intervals (h_int 0 ε) (h_int _ _)]
rw [hg.intervalIntegral_add_zsmul_eq ⌊t / T⌋ ε h_int, hg.intervalIntegral_add_eq ε 0, zero_add,
add_le_add_iff_right]
exact (continuous_primitive h_int 0).continuousOn.sInf_image_Icc_le <|
mem_Icc_of_Ico (Int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico T t hT)
#align function.periodic.Inf_add_zsmul_le_integral_of_pos Function.Periodic.sInf_add_zsmul_le_integral_of_pos
/-- If `g : ℝ → ℝ` is periodic with period `T > 0`, then for any `t : ℝ`, the function
`t ↦ ∫ x in 0..t, g x` is bounded above by `t ↦ X + ⌊t/T⌋ • Y` for appropriate constants `X` and
`Y`. -/
theorem integral_le_sSup_add_zsmul_of_pos (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ) :
(∫ x in (0)..t, g x) ≤
sSup ((fun t => ∫ x in (0)..t, g x) '' Icc 0 T) + ⌊t / T⌋ • ∫ x in (0)..T, g x := by
let ε := Int.fract (t / T) * T
conv_lhs =>
rw [← Int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq T t (by linarith), ←
integral_add_adjacent_intervals (h_int 0 ε) (h_int _ _)]
rw [hg.intervalIntegral_add_zsmul_eq ⌊t / T⌋ ε h_int, hg.intervalIntegral_add_eq ε 0, zero_add,
add_le_add_iff_right]
exact (continuous_primitive h_int 0).continuousOn.le_sSup_image_Icc
(mem_Icc_of_Ico (Int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico T t hT))
#align function.periodic.integral_le_Sup_add_zsmul_of_pos Function.Periodic.integral_le_sSup_add_zsmul_of_pos
/-- If `g : ℝ → ℝ` is periodic with period `T > 0` and `0 < ∫ x in 0..T, g x`, then
`t ↦ ∫ x in 0..t, g x` tends to `∞` as `t` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_intervalIntegral_of_pos (h₀ : 0 < ∫ x in (0)..T, g x) (hT : 0 < T) :
Tendsto (fun t => ∫ x in (0)..t, g x) atTop atTop := by
apply tendsto_atTop_mono (hg.sInf_add_zsmul_le_integral_of_pos h_int hT)
apply atTop.tendsto_atTop_add_const_left (sInf <| (fun t => ∫ x in (0)..t, g x) '' Icc 0 T)
apply Tendsto.atTop_zsmul_const h₀
exact tendsto_floor_atTop.comp (tendsto_id.atTop_mul_const (inv_pos.mpr hT))
#align function.periodic.tendsto_at_top_interval_integral_of_pos Function.Periodic.tendsto_atTop_intervalIntegral_of_pos
/-- If `g : ℝ → ℝ` is periodic with period `T > 0` and `0 < ∫ x in 0..T, g x`, then
`t ↦ ∫ x in 0..t, g x` tends to `-∞` as `t` tends to `-∞`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Periodic.lean | 360 | 365 | theorem tendsto_atBot_intervalIntegral_of_pos (h₀ : 0 < ∫ x in (0)..T, g x) (hT : 0 < T) :
Tendsto (fun t => ∫ x in (0)..t, g x) atBot atBot := by |
apply tendsto_atBot_mono (hg.integral_le_sSup_add_zsmul_of_pos h_int hT)
apply atBot.tendsto_atBot_add_const_left (sSup <| (fun t => ∫ x in (0)..t, g x) '' Icc 0 T)
apply Tendsto.atBot_zsmul_const h₀
exact tendsto_floor_atBot.comp (tendsto_id.atBot_mul_const (inv_pos.mpr hT))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
#align_import data.nat.factors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"008205aa645b3f194c1da47025c5f110c8406eab"
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file deals with the factors of natural numbers.
## Important declarations
- `Nat.factors n`: the prime factorization of `n`
- `Nat.factors_unique`: uniqueness of the prime factorisation
-/
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
attribute [instance 0] instBEqNat
/-- `factors n` is the prime factorization of `n`, listed in increasing order. -/
def factors : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| 1 => []
| k + 2 =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
m :: factors ((k + 2) / m)
decreasing_by show (k + 2) / m < (k + 2); exact factors_lemma
#align nat.factors Nat.factors
@[simp]
theorem factors_zero : factors 0 = [] := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_zero Nat.factors_zero
@[simp]
theorem factors_one : factors 1 = [] := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_one Nat.factors_one
@[simp]
theorem factors_two : factors 2 = [2] := by simp [factors]
theorem prime_of_mem_factors {n : ℕ} : ∀ {p : ℕ}, (h : p ∈ factors n) → Prime p := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro p h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
have h₁ : p = m ∨ p ∈ factors ((k + 2) / m) :=
List.mem_cons.1 (by rwa [factors] at h)
exact Or.casesOn h₁ (fun h₂ => h₂.symm ▸ minFac_prime (by simp)) prime_of_mem_factors
#align nat.prime_of_mem_factors Nat.prime_of_mem_factors
theorem pos_of_mem_factors {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ factors n) : 0 < p :=
Prime.pos (prime_of_mem_factors h)
#align nat.pos_of_mem_factors Nat.pos_of_mem_factors
theorem prod_factors : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → List.prod (factors n) = n
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| k + 2 => fun _ =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
show (factors (k + 2)).prod = (k + 2) by
have h₁ : (k + 2) / m ≠ 0 := fun h => by
have : (k + 2) = 0 * m := (Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left (minFac_pos _) (minFac_dvd _)).1 h
rw [zero_mul] at this; exact (show k + 2 ≠ 0 by simp) this
rw [factors, List.prod_cons, prod_factors h₁, Nat.mul_div_cancel' (minFac_dvd _)]
#align nat.prod_factors Nat.prod_factors
theorem factors_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : p.factors = [p] := by
have : p = p - 2 + 2 := (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hp.two_le).mp rfl
rw [this, Nat.factors]
simp only [Eq.symm this]
have : Nat.minFac p = p := (Nat.prime_def_minFac.mp hp).2
simp only [this, Nat.factors, Nat.div_self (Nat.Prime.pos hp)]
#align nat.factors_prime Nat.factors_prime
theorem factors_chain {n : ℕ} :
∀ {a}, (∀ p, Prime p → p ∣ n → a ≤ p) → List.Chain (· ≤ ·) a (factors n) := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro a h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
rw [factors]
refine List.Chain.cons ((le_minFac.2 h).resolve_left (by simp)) (factors_chain ?_)
exact fun p pp d => minFac_le_of_dvd pp.two_le (d.trans <| div_dvd_of_dvd <| minFac_dvd _)
#align nat.factors_chain Nat.factors_chain
theorem factors_chain_2 (n) : List.Chain (· ≤ ·) 2 (factors n) :=
factors_chain fun _ pp _ => pp.two_le
#align nat.factors_chain_2 Nat.factors_chain_2
theorem factors_chain' (n) : List.Chain' (· ≤ ·) (factors n) :=
@List.Chain'.tail _ _ (_ :: _) (factors_chain_2 _)
#align nat.factors_chain' Nat.factors_chain'
theorem factors_sorted (n : ℕ) : List.Sorted (· ≤ ·) (factors n) :=
List.chain'_iff_pairwise.1 (factors_chain' _)
#align nat.factors_sorted Nat.factors_sorted
/-- `factors` can be constructed inductively by extracting `minFac`, for sufficiently large `n`. -/
theorem factors_add_two (n : ℕ) :
factors (n + 2) = minFac (n + 2) :: factors ((n + 2) / minFac (n + 2)) := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_add_two Nat.factors_add_two
@[simp]
theorem factors_eq_nil (n : ℕ) : n.factors = [] ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
· rw [factors] at h
injection h
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· exact factors_zero
· exact factors_one
#align nat.factors_eq_nil Nat.factors_eq_nil
open scoped List in
theorem eq_of_perm_factors {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a.factors ~ b.factors) :
a = b := by simpa [prod_factors ha, prod_factors hb] using List.Perm.prod_eq h
#align nat.eq_of_perm_factors Nat.eq_of_perm_factors
section
open List
theorem mem_factors_iff_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : Prime p) : p ∈ factors n ↔ p ∣ n :=
⟨fun h => prod_factors hn ▸ List.dvd_prod h, fun h =>
mem_list_primes_of_dvd_prod (prime_iff.mp hp) (fun _ h => prime_iff.mp (prime_of_mem_factors h))
((prod_factors hn).symm ▸ h)⟩
#align nat.mem_factors_iff_dvd Nat.mem_factors_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_of_mem_factors {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.factors) : p ∣ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· exact dvd_zero p
· rwa [← mem_factors_iff_dvd hn.ne' (prime_of_mem_factors h)]
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_factors Nat.dvd_of_mem_factors
theorem mem_factors {n p} (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∈ factors n ↔ Prime p ∧ p ∣ n :=
⟨fun h => ⟨prime_of_mem_factors h, dvd_of_mem_factors h⟩, fun ⟨hprime, hdvd⟩ =>
(mem_factors_iff_dvd hn hprime).mpr hdvd⟩
#align nat.mem_factors Nat.mem_factors
@[simp] lemma mem_factors' {n p} : p ∈ n.factors ↔ p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
cases n <;> simp [mem_factors, *]
theorem le_of_mem_factors {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.factors) : p ≤ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· rw [factors_zero] at h
cases h
· exact le_of_dvd hn (dvd_of_mem_factors h)
#align nat.le_of_mem_factors Nat.le_of_mem_factors
/-- **Fundamental theorem of arithmetic**-/
theorem factors_unique {n : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (h₁ : prod l = n) (h₂ : ∀ p ∈ l, Prime p) :
l ~ factors n := by
refine perm_of_prod_eq_prod ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [h₁]
refine (prod_factors ?_).symm
rintro rfl
rw [prod_eq_zero_iff] at h₁
exact Prime.ne_zero (h₂ 0 h₁) rfl
· simp_rw [← prime_iff]
exact h₂
· simp_rw [← prime_iff]
exact fun p => prime_of_mem_factors
#align nat.factors_unique Nat.factors_unique
theorem Prime.factors_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).factors = List.replicate n p := by
symm
rw [← List.replicate_perm]
apply Nat.factors_unique (List.prod_replicate n p)
intro q hq
rwa [eq_of_mem_replicate hq]
#align nat.prime.factors_pow Nat.Prime.factors_pow
theorem eq_prime_pow_of_unique_prime_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hpos : n ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ {d}, Nat.Prime d → d ∣ n → d = p) : n = p ^ n.factors.length := by
set k := n.factors.length
rw [← prod_factors hpos, ← prod_replicate k p,
eq_replicate_of_mem fun d hd => h (prime_of_mem_factors hd) (dvd_of_mem_factors hd)]
#align nat.eq_prime_pow_of_unique_prime_dvd Nat.eq_prime_pow_of_unique_prime_dvd
/-- For positive `a` and `b`, the prime factors of `a * b` are the union of those of `a` and `b` -/
theorem perm_factors_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a * b).factors ~ a.factors ++ b.factors := by
refine (factors_unique ?_ ?_).symm
· rw [List.prod_append, prod_factors ha, prod_factors hb]
· intro p hp
rw [List.mem_append] at hp
cases' hp with hp' hp' <;> exact prime_of_mem_factors hp'
#align nat.perm_factors_mul Nat.perm_factors_mul
/-- For coprime `a` and `b`, the prime factors of `a * b` are the union of those of `a` and `b` -/
theorem perm_factors_mul_of_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).factors ~ a.factors ++ b.factors := by
rcases a.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | ha)
· simp [(coprime_zero_left _).mp hab]
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· simp [(coprime_zero_right _).mp hab]
exact perm_factors_mul ha.ne' hb.ne'
#align nat.perm_factors_mul_of_coprime Nat.perm_factors_mul_of_coprime
theorem factors_sublist_right {n k : ℕ} (h : k ≠ 0) : n.factors <+ (n * k).factors := by
cases' n with hn
· simp [zero_mul]
apply sublist_of_subperm_of_sorted _ (factors_sorted _) (factors_sorted _)
simp only [(perm_factors_mul (Nat.succ_ne_zero _) h).subperm_left]
exact (sublist_append_left _ _).subperm
#align nat.factors_sublist_right Nat.factors_sublist_right
theorem factors_sublist_of_dvd {n k : ℕ} (h : n ∣ k) (h' : k ≠ 0) : n.factors <+ k.factors := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := h
exact factors_sublist_right (right_ne_zero_of_mul h')
#align nat.factors_sublist_of_dvd Nat.factors_sublist_of_dvd
theorem factors_subset_right {n k : ℕ} (h : k ≠ 0) : n.factors ⊆ (n * k).factors :=
(factors_sublist_right h).subset
#align nat.factors_subset_right Nat.factors_subset_right
theorem factors_subset_of_dvd {n k : ℕ} (h : n ∣ k) (h' : k ≠ 0) : n.factors ⊆ k.factors :=
(factors_sublist_of_dvd h h').subset
#align nat.factors_subset_of_dvd Nat.factors_subset_of_dvd
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factors.lean | 245 | 257 | theorem dvd_of_factors_subperm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a.factors <+~ b.factors) : a ∣ b := by |
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· exact dvd_zero _
rcases a with (_ | _ | a)
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· exact one_dvd _
-- Porting note: previous proof
--use (b.factors.diff a.succ.succ.factors).prod
use (@List.diff _ instBEqOfDecidableEq b.factors a.succ.succ.factors).prod
nth_rw 1 [← Nat.prod_factors ha]
rw [← List.prod_append,
List.Perm.prod_eq <| List.subperm_append_diff_self_of_count_le <| List.subperm_ext_iff.mp h,
Nat.prod_factors hb.ne']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Center
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
#align_import group_theory.subsemigroup.center from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1ac8d4304efba9d03fa720d06516fac845aa5353"
/-!
# Centers of rings
-/
variable {M : Type*}
namespace Set
variable (M)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mem_center [NonAssocSemiring M] (n : ℕ) : (n : M) ∈ Set.center M where
comm _:= by rw [Nat.commute_cast]
left_assoc _ _ := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]
| succ n ihn => rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul, ihn, add_mul, add_mul, one_mul]
mid_assoc _ _ := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, zero_mul]
| succ n ihn => rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, mul_add, add_mul, ihn, mul_add, one_mul, mul_one]
right_assoc _ _ := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
| succ n ihn => rw [Nat.cast_succ, mul_add, ihn, mul_add, mul_add, mul_one, mul_one]
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mem_center [NonAssocSemiring M] (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) ∈ Set.center M :=
natCast_mem_center M n
@[simp]
theorem intCast_mem_center [NonAssocRing M] (n : ℤ) : (n : M) ∈ Set.center M where
comm _ := by rw [Int.commute_cast]
left_assoc _ _ := match n with
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [Int.cast_natCast, (natCast_mem_center _ n).left_assoc _ _]
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, neg_add_rev, add_mul, add_mul, add_mul,
neg_mul, one_mul, neg_mul 1, one_mul, ← neg_mul, add_right_inj, neg_mul,
(natCast_mem_center _ n).left_assoc _ _, neg_mul, neg_mul]
mid_assoc _ _ := match n with
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [Int.cast_natCast, (natCast_mem_center _ n).mid_assoc _ _]
| Int.negSucc n => by
simp only [Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, neg_add_rev]
rw [add_mul, mul_add, add_mul, mul_add, neg_mul, one_mul]
rw [neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_one, mul_neg, neg_mul, neg_mul]
rw [(natCast_mem_center _ n).mid_assoc _ _]
simp only [mul_neg]
right_assoc _ _ := match n with
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [Int.cast_natCast, (natCast_mem_center _ n).right_assoc _ _]
| Int.negSucc n => by
simp only [Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, neg_add_rev]
rw [mul_add, mul_add, mul_add, mul_neg, mul_one, mul_neg, mul_neg, mul_one, mul_neg,
add_right_inj, (natCast_mem_center _ n).right_assoc _ _, mul_neg, mul_neg]
variable {M}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Center.lean | 72 | 77 | theorem add_mem_center [Distrib M] {a b : M} (ha : a ∈ Set.center M) (hb : b ∈ Set.center M) :
a + b ∈ Set.center M where
comm _ := by | rw [add_mul, mul_add, ha.comm, hb.comm]
left_assoc _ _ := by rw [add_mul, ha.left_assoc, hb.left_assoc, ← add_mul, ← add_mul]
mid_assoc _ _ := by rw [mul_add, add_mul, ha.mid_assoc, hb.mid_assoc, ← mul_add, ← add_mul]
right_assoc _ _ := by rw [mul_add, ha.right_assoc, hb.right_assoc, ← mul_add, ← mul_add]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
/-!
# Verification of the `Ordnode α` datatype
This file proves the correctness of the operations in `Data.Ordmap.Ordnode`.
The public facing version is the type `Ordset α`, which is a wrapper around
`Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type, and it exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same
thing but bundle the correctness proofs. The advantage is that it is possible
to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert` will actually find
the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`
## Implementation notes
The majority of this file is actually in the `Ordnode` namespace, because we first
have to prove the correctness of all the operations (and defining what correctness
means here is actually somewhat subtle). So all the actual `Ordset` operations are
at the very end, once we have all the theorems.
An `Ordnode α` is an inductive type which describes a tree which stores the `size` at
internal nodes. The correctness invariant of an `Ordnode α` is:
* `Ordnode.Sized t`: All internal `size` fields must match the actual measured
size of the tree. (This is not hard to satisfy.)
* `Ordnode.Balanced t`: Unless the tree has the form `()` or `((a) b)` or `(a (b))`
(that is, nil or a single singleton subtree), the two subtrees must satisfy
`size l ≤ δ * size r` and `size r ≤ δ * size l`, where `δ := 3` is a global
parameter of the data structure (and this property must hold recursively at subtrees).
This is why we say this is a "size balanced tree" data structure.
* `Ordnode.Bounded lo hi t`: The members of the tree must be in strictly increasing order,
meaning that if `a` is in the left subtree and `b` is the root, then `a ≤ b` and
`¬ (b ≤ a)`. We enforce this using `Ordnode.Bounded` which includes also a global
upper and lower bound.
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
**Note:** This file is incomplete, in the sense that the intent is to have verified
versions and lemmas about all the definitions in `Ordnode.lean`, but at the moment only
a few operations are verified (the hard part should be out of the way, but still).
Contributors are encouraged to pick this up and finish the job, if it appeals to you.
## Tags
ordered map, ordered set, data structure, verified programming
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
/-! ### delta and ratio -/
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
/-! ### `singleton` -/
/-! ### `size` and `empty` -/
/-- O(n). Computes the actual number of elements in the set, ignoring the cached `size` field. -/
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
/-! ### `Sized` -/
/-- The `Sized` property asserts that all the `size` fields in nodes match the actual size of the
respective subtrees. -/
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
/-! `dual` -/
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
/-! `Balanced` -/
/-- The `BalancedSz l r` asserts that a hypothetical tree with children of sizes `l` and `r` is
balanced: either `l ≤ δ * r` and `r ≤ δ * r`, or the tree is trivial with a singleton on one side
and nothing on the other. -/
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
/-- The `Balanced t` asserts that the tree `t` satisfies the balance invariants
(at every level). -/
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
/-! ### `rotate` and `balance` -/
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, left associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, right associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> (a ()) b` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> a (() b)` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a left rotation `x (y z) -> ((x y) z)`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a right rotation `(x y) z -> (x (y z))`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- A left balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
/-- A right balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
/-- The full balance operation. This is the same as `balance`, but with less manual inlining.
It is somewhat easier to work with this version in proofs. -/
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
/-! ## `All`, `Any`, `Emem`, `Amem` -/
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
/-! ### `toList` -/
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
#align ordnode.length_to_list Ordnode.length_toList
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} (h₁ : Sized t₁) (h₂ : Sized t₂) :
Equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ toList t₁ = toList t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => by rw [← length_toList h₁, h, length_toList h₂]
#align ordnode.equiv_iff Ordnode.equiv_iff
/-! ### `mem` -/
theorem pos_size_of_mem [LE α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {x : α} {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by cases t; · { contradiction }; · { simp [h.1] }
#align ordnode.pos_size_of_mem Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem
/-! ### `(find/erase/split)(Min/Max)` -/
theorem findMin'_dual : ∀ (t) (x : α), findMin' (dual t) x = findMax' x t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node _ _ x r, _ => findMin'_dual r x
#align ordnode.find_min'_dual Ordnode.findMin'_dual
theorem findMax'_dual (t) (x : α) : findMax' x (dual t) = findMin' t x := by
rw [← findMin'_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max'_dual Ordnode.findMax'_dual
theorem findMin_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, findMin (dual t) = findMax t
| nil => rfl
| node _ _ _ _ => congr_arg some <| findMin'_dual _ _
#align ordnode.find_min_dual Ordnode.findMin_dual
theorem findMax_dual (t : Ordnode α) : findMax (dual t) = findMin t := by
rw [← findMin_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max_dual Ordnode.findMax_dual
theorem dual_eraseMin : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (eraseMin t) = eraseMax (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ nil x r => rfl
| node _ (node sz l' y r') x r => by
rw [eraseMin, dual_balanceR, dual_eraseMin (node sz l' y r'), dual, dual, dual, eraseMax]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_min Ordnode.dual_eraseMin
theorem dual_eraseMax (t : Ordnode α) : dual (eraseMax t) = eraseMin (dual t) := by
rw [← dual_dual (eraseMin _), dual_eraseMin, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_max Ordnode.dual_eraseMax
theorem splitMin_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMin' l x r = (findMin' l x, eraseMin (node s l x r))
| _, nil, x, r => rfl
| _, node ls ll lx lr, x, r => by rw [splitMin', splitMin_eq ls ll lx lr, findMin', eraseMin]
#align ordnode.split_min_eq Ordnode.splitMin_eq
theorem splitMax_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMax' l x r = (eraseMax (node s l x r), findMax' x r)
| _, l, x, nil => rfl
| _, l, x, node ls ll lx lr => by rw [splitMax', splitMax_eq ls ll lx lr, findMax', eraseMax]
#align ordnode.split_max_eq Ordnode.splitMax_eq
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMin'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (t) (x : α), All P t → P x → P (findMin' t x)
| nil, _x, _, hx => hx
| node _ ll lx _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂, _⟩, _ => findMin'_all ll lx h₁ h₂
#align ordnode.find_min'_all Ordnode.findMin'_all
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMax'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (x : α) (t), P x → All P t → P (findMax' x t)
| _x, nil, hx, _ => hx
| _, node _ _ lx lr, _, ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩ => findMax'_all lx lr h₂ h₃
#align ordnode.find_max'_all Ordnode.findMax'_all
/-! ### `glue` -/
/-! ### `merge` -/
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_left (t : Ordnode α) : merge t nil = t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_left Ordnode.merge_nil_left
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_right (t : Ordnode α) : merge nil t = t :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_right Ordnode.merge_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem merge_node {ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr} :
merge (@node α ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) =
if delta * ls < rs then balanceL (merge (node ls ll lx lr) rl) rx rr
else if delta * rs < ls then balanceR ll lx (merge lr (node rs rl rx rr))
else glue (node ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_node Ordnode.merge_node
/-! ### `insert` -/
theorem dual_insert [Preorder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) :
∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (Ordnode.insert x t) = @Ordnode.insert αᵒᵈ _ _ x (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
have : @cmpLE αᵒᵈ _ _ x y = cmpLE y x := rfl
rw [Ordnode.insert, dual, Ordnode.insert, this, ← cmpLE_swap x y]
cases cmpLE x y <;>
simp [Ordering.swap, Ordnode.insert, dual_balanceL, dual_balanceR, dual_insert]
#align ordnode.dual_insert Ordnode.dual_insert
/-! ### `balance` properties -/
theorem balance_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r) : @balance α l x r = balance' l x r := by
cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· rw [sr.eq_node'] at hr ⊢
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr <;> cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size rrl = 0 ∧ size rrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm
rwa [size, sr.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rrs = 1 := sr.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size rll = 0 ∧ size rlr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1
rwa [size, sr.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rls = 1 := sr.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [zero_add, if_neg, if_pos, rotateL]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node']; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.2.1.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sr.2.1.pos sr.2.2.pos))
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rw [sl.eq_node'] at hl ⊢
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size lrl = 0 ∧ size lrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm
rwa [size, sl.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lrs = 1 := sl.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size lll = 0 ∧ size llr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1
rwa [size, sl.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lls = 1 := sl.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node']; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.2.2.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· apply Nat.not_lt_zero
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sl.2.1.pos sl.2.2.pos))
· simp [balance, balance']
symm; rw [if_neg]
· split_ifs with h h_1
· have rd : delta ≤ size rl + size rr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sl.pos) h
rwa [sr.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr
· rw [size, zero_add] at rd
exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr
· exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateL]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node', sr.1]; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.1, sr.2.1.1]; abel
· have ld : delta ≤ size ll + size lr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sr.pos) h_1
rwa [sl.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr
· rw [size, zero_add] at ld
exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr
· exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateR]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node', sl.1]; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.1, sl.2.2.1]; abel
· simp [node']
· exact not_le_of_gt (add_le_add (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sl.pos) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sr.pos))
#align ordnode.balance_eq_balance' Ordnode.balance_eq_balance'
theorem balanceL_eq_balance {l x r} (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r) (H1 : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l) :
@balanceL α l x r = balance l x r := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· have : size rl = 0 ∧ size rr = 0 := by
have := H1 rfl
rwa [size, sr.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
rw [sr.eq_node']; rfl
· replace H2 : ¬rs > delta * ls := not_lt_of_le (H2 sl.pos sr.pos)
simp [balanceL, balance, H2]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance
/-- `Raised n m` means `m` is either equal or one up from `n`. -/
def Raised (n m : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n ∨ m = n + 1
#align ordnode.raised Ordnode.Raised
theorem raised_iff {n m} : Raised n m ↔ n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n + 1 := by
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, Nat.le_succ _⟩
· exact ⟨Nat.le_succ _, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (le_antisymm h₂ h₁)
#align ordnode.raised_iff Ordnode.raised_iff
theorem Raised.dist_le {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist n m ≤ 1 := by
cases' raised_iff.1 H with H1 H2; rwa [Nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le H1, tsub_le_iff_left]
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le Ordnode.Raised.dist_le
theorem Raised.dist_le' {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist m n ≤ 1 := by
rw [Nat.dist_comm]; exact H.dist_le
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le' Ordnode.Raised.dist_le'
theorem Raised.add_left (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (k + n) (k + m) := by
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.add_left Ordnode.Raised.add_left
theorem Raised.add_right (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (n + k) (m + k) := by
rw [add_comm, add_comm m]; exact H.add_left _
#align ordnode.raised.add_right Ordnode.Raised.add_right
theorem Raised.right {l x₁ x₂ r₁ r₂} (H : Raised (size r₁) (size r₂)) :
Raised (size (@node' α l x₁ r₁)) (size (@node' α l x₂ r₂)) := by
rw [node', size_node, size_node]; generalize size r₂ = m at H ⊢
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.right Ordnode.Raised.right
theorem balanceL_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceL α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← balance_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr, balanceL_eq_balance sl sr]
· intro l0; rw [l0] at H
rcases H with (⟨_, ⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm
exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 (balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm)
· intro l1 _
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩ | ⟨r', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) H) (mul_pos (by decide) l1 : (0 : ℕ) < _)
· exact le_trans H₂ (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (raised_iff.1 e).1)
· cases raised_iff.1 e; unfold delta; omega
· exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 H₂
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance'
theorem balance_sz_dual {l r}
(H : (∃ l', Raised (@size α l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (@size α r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size (dual r)) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size (dual l))) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size (dual l)) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size (dual r)) r' := by
rw [size_dual, size_dual]
exact
H.symm.imp (Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
(Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
#align ordnode.balance_sz_dual Ordnode.balance_sz_dual
theorem size_balanceL {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
#align ordnode.size_balance_l Ordnode.size_balanceL
theorem all_balanceL {P l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
All P (@balanceL α l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
#align ordnode.all_balance_l Ordnode.all_balanceL
theorem balanceR_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceR α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceR l x r), dual_balanceR,
balanceL_eq_balance' hr.dual hl.dual sr.dual sl.dual (balance_sz_dual H), ← dual_balance',
dual_dual]
#align ordnode.balance_r_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceR_eq_balance'
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 875 | 879 | theorem size_balanceR {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by |
rw [balanceR_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sort
import Mathlib.Order.Category.NonemptyFinLinOrd
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsIso
#align_import algebraic_topology.simplex_category from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8ac6315bcfcbaf2d19a046719c3b553206dac75"
/-! # The simplex category
We construct a skeletal model of the simplex category, with objects `ℕ` and the
morphism `n ⟶ m` being the monotone maps from `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin (m+1)`.
We show that this category is equivalent to `NonemptyFinLinOrd`.
## Remarks
The definitions `SimplexCategory` and `SimplexCategory.Hom` are marked as irreducible.
We provide the following functions to work with these objects:
1. `SimplexCategory.mk` creates an object of `SimplexCategory` out of a natural number.
Use the notation `[n]` in the `Simplicial` locale.
2. `SimplexCategory.len` gives the "length" of an object of `SimplexCategory`, as a natural.
3. `SimplexCategory.Hom.mk` makes a morphism out of a monotone map between `Fin`'s.
4. `SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom` gives the underlying monotone map associated to a
term of `SimplexCategory.Hom`.
-/
universe v
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
/-- The simplex category:
* objects are natural numbers `n : ℕ`
* morphisms from `n` to `m` are monotone functions `Fin (n+1) → Fin (m+1)`
-/
def SimplexCategory :=
ℕ
#align simplex_category SimplexCategory
namespace SimplexCategory
section
-- Porting note: the definition of `SimplexCategory` is made irreducible below
/-- Interpret a natural number as an object of the simplex category. -/
def mk (n : ℕ) : SimplexCategory :=
n
#align simplex_category.mk SimplexCategory.mk
/-- the `n`-dimensional simplex can be denoted `[n]` -/
scoped[Simplicial] notation "[" n "]" => SimplexCategory.mk n
-- TODO: Make `len` irreducible.
/-- The length of an object of `SimplexCategory`. -/
def len (n : SimplexCategory) : ℕ :=
n
#align simplex_category.len SimplexCategory.len
@[ext]
theorem ext (a b : SimplexCategory) : a.len = b.len → a = b :=
id
#align simplex_category.ext SimplexCategory.ext
attribute [irreducible] SimplexCategory
open Simplicial
@[simp]
theorem len_mk (n : ℕ) : [n].len = n :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.len_mk SimplexCategory.len_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_len (n : SimplexCategory) : ([n.len] : SimplexCategory) = n :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.mk_len SimplexCategory.mk_len
/-- A recursor for `SimplexCategory`. Use it as `induction Δ using SimplexCategory.rec`. -/
protected def rec {F : SimplexCategory → Sort*} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, F [n]) : ∀ X, F X := fun n =>
h n.len
#align simplex_category.rec SimplexCategory.rec
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- Morphisms in the `SimplexCategory`. -/
protected def Hom (a b : SimplexCategory) :=
Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)
#align simplex_category.hom SimplexCategory.Hom
namespace Hom
/-- Make a morphism in `SimplexCategory` from a monotone map of `Fin`'s. -/
def mk {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)) : SimplexCategory.Hom a b :=
f
#align simplex_category.hom.mk SimplexCategory.Hom.mk
/-- Recover the monotone map from a morphism in the simplex category. -/
def toOrderHom {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1) :=
f
#align simplex_category.hom.to_order_hom SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom
theorem ext' {a b : SimplexCategory} (f g : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
f.toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom → f = g :=
id
#align simplex_category.hom.ext SimplexCategory.Hom.ext'
attribute [irreducible] SimplexCategory.Hom
@[simp]
theorem mk_toOrderHom {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) : mk f.toOrderHom = f :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.mk_to_order_hom SimplexCategory.Hom.mk_toOrderHom
@[simp]
theorem toOrderHom_mk {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)) :
(mk f).toOrderHom = f :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.to_order_hom_mk SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom_mk
theorem mk_toOrderHom_apply {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1))
(i : Fin (a.len + 1)) : (mk f).toOrderHom i = f i :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.mk_to_order_hom_apply SimplexCategory.Hom.mk_toOrderHom_apply
/-- Identity morphisms of `SimplexCategory`. -/
@[simp]
def id (a : SimplexCategory) : SimplexCategory.Hom a a :=
mk OrderHom.id
#align simplex_category.hom.id SimplexCategory.Hom.id
/-- Composition of morphisms of `SimplexCategory`. -/
@[simp]
def comp {a b c : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom b c) (g : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
SimplexCategory.Hom a c :=
mk <| f.toOrderHom.comp g.toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.hom.comp SimplexCategory.Hom.comp
end Hom
instance smallCategory : SmallCategory.{0} SimplexCategory where
Hom n m := SimplexCategory.Hom n m
id m := SimplexCategory.Hom.id _
comp f g := SimplexCategory.Hom.comp g f
#align simplex_category.small_category SimplexCategory.smallCategory
@[simp]
lemma id_toOrderHom (a : SimplexCategory) :
Hom.toOrderHom (𝟙 a) = OrderHom.id := rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_toOrderHom {a b c: SimplexCategory} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(f ≫ g).toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom.comp f.toOrderHom := rfl
-- Porting note: added because `Hom.ext'` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
theorem Hom.ext {a b : SimplexCategory} (f g : a ⟶ b) :
f.toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom → f = g :=
Hom.ext' _ _
/-- The constant morphism from [0]. -/
def const (x y : SimplexCategory) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) : x ⟶ y :=
Hom.mk <| ⟨fun _ => i, by tauto⟩
#align simplex_category.const SimplexCategory.const
@[simp]
lemma const_eq_id : const [0] [0] 0 = 𝟙 _ := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma const_apply (x y : SimplexCategory) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) (a : Fin (x.len + 1)) :
(const x y i).toOrderHom a = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_comp (x : SimplexCategory) {y z : SimplexCategory}
(f : y ⟶ z) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) :
const x y i ≫ f = const x z (f.toOrderHom i) :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.const_comp SimplexCategory.const_comp
/-- Make a morphism `[n] ⟶ [m]` from a monotone map between fin's.
This is useful for constructing morphisms between `[n]` directly
without identifying `n` with `[n].len`.
-/
@[simp]
def mkHom {n m : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) →o Fin (m + 1)) : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [m] :=
SimplexCategory.Hom.mk f
#align simplex_category.mk_hom SimplexCategory.mkHom
theorem hom_zero_zero (f : ([0] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [0]) : f = 𝟙 _ := by
ext : 3
apply @Subsingleton.elim (Fin 1)
#align simplex_category.hom_zero_zero SimplexCategory.hom_zero_zero
end
open Simplicial
section Generators
/-!
## Generating maps for the simplex category
TODO: prove that the simplex category is equivalent to
one given by the following generators and relations.
-/
/-- The `i`-th face map from `[n]` to `[n+1]` -/
def δ {n} (i : Fin (n + 2)) : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n + 1] :=
mkHom (Fin.succAboveOrderEmb i).toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.δ SimplexCategory.δ
/-- The `i`-th degeneracy map from `[n+1]` to `[n]` -/
def σ {n} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : ([n + 1] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n] :=
mkHom
{ toFun := Fin.predAbove i
monotone' := Fin.predAbove_right_monotone i }
#align simplex_category.σ SimplexCategory.σ
/-- The generic case of the first simplicial identity -/
theorem δ_comp_δ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ j) :
δ i ≫ δ j.succ = δ j ≫ δ (Fin.castSucc i) := by
ext k
dsimp [δ, Fin.succAbove]
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩
rcases j with ⟨j, _⟩
rcases k with ⟨k, _⟩
split_ifs <;> · simp at * <;> omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ
theorem δ_comp_δ' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : Fin.castSucc i < j) :
δ i ≫ δ j =
δ (j.pred fun (hj : j = 0) => by simp [hj, Fin.not_lt_zero] at H) ≫
δ (Fin.castSucc i) := by
rw [← δ_comp_δ]
· rw [Fin.succ_pred]
· simpa only [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← Fin.val_succ,
j.succ_pred, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val] using H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ'
theorem δ_comp_δ'' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
δ (i.castLT (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.le_iff_val_le_val.mp H) j.is_lt)) ≫ δ j.succ =
δ j ≫ δ i := by
rw [δ_comp_δ]
· rfl
· exact H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ'' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ''
/-- The special case of the first simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} : δ i ≫ δ (Fin.castSucc i) = δ i ≫ δ i.succ :=
(δ_comp_δ (le_refl i)).symm
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ_self SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
δ i ≫ δ j = δ i ≫ δ i.succ := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_δ_self]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ_self' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ_self'
/-- The second simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_le {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ j.succ = σ j ≫ δ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [σ, δ]
rcases le_or_lt i k with (hik | hik)
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hik),
Fin.succ_predAbove_succ, Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc]
rcases le_or_lt k (j.castSucc) with (hjk | hjk)
· rwa [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk, Fin.castSucc_castPred]
· rw [Fin.le_castSucc_iff, Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.succ_pred]
exact H.trans_lt hjk
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hik)]
have hjk := H.trans_lt' hik
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr
(hjk.trans (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ _)).le),
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk.le, Fin.castPred_castSucc, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt,
Fin.castSucc_castPred]
rwa [Fin.castSucc_castPred]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_le SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_le
/-- The first part of the third simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
rcases i with ⟨i, hi⟩
ext ⟨j, hj⟩
simp? at hj says simp only [len_mk] at hj
dsimp [σ, δ, Fin.predAbove, Fin.succAbove]
simp only [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, Fin.dite_val, Fin.ite_val, Fin.coe_pred, ge_iff_le,
Fin.coe_castLT, dite_eq_ite]
split_ifs
any_goals simp
all_goals omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_self SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self' {n} {j : Fin (n + 2)} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
δ j ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_self]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_self' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_self'
/-- The second part of the third simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} : δ i.succ ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
ext j
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩
rcases j with ⟨j, _⟩
dsimp [δ, σ, Fin.succAbove, Fin.predAbove]
split_ifs <;> simp <;> simp at * <;> omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_succ SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_succ
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ' {n} (j : Fin (n + 2)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (H : j = i.succ) :
δ j ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_succ]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_succ' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_succ'
/-- The fourth simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : Fin.castSucc j < i) :
δ i.succ ≫ σ (Fin.castSucc j) = σ j ≫ δ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [δ, σ]
rcases le_or_lt k i with (hik | hik)
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr hik)]
rcases le_or_lt k (j.castSucc) with (hjk | hjk)
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _
(Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hjk), Fin.castPred_castSucc,
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, Fin.castSucc_castPred]
rw [Fin.castSucc_castPred]
exact hjk.trans_lt H
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hjk),
Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt,
Fin.castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
rwa [Fin.castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, Fin.succ_pred]
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hik)]
have hjk := H.trans hik
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _
(Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr hjk.le),
Fin.pred_succ, Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc, Fin.succ_pred]
rwa [Fin.le_castSucc_pred_iff]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_gt SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_gt
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SimplexCategory.lean | 358 | 364 | theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : j.succ < i) :
δ i ≫ σ j = σ (j.castLT ((add_lt_add_iff_right 1).mp (lt_of_lt_of_le H i.is_le))) ≫
δ (i.pred fun (hi : i = 0) => by simp only [Fin.not_lt_zero, hi] at H) := by |
rw [← δ_comp_σ_of_gt]
· simp
· rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT, ← Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff, Fin.succ_pred]
exact H
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.