Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
/-!
# Perfect fields and rings
In this file we define perfect fields, together with a generalisation to (commutative) rings in
prime characteristic.
## Main definitions / statements:
* `PerfectRing`: a ring of characteristic `p` (prime) is said to be perfect in the sense of Serre,
if its absolute Frobenius map `x ↦ xᵖ` is bijective.
* `PerfectField`: a field `K` is said to be perfect if every irreducible polynomial over `K` is
separable.
* `PerfectRing.toPerfectField`: a field that is perfect in the sense of Serre is a perfect field.
* `PerfectField.toPerfectRing`: a perfect field of characteristic `p` (prime) is perfect in the
sense of Serre.
* `PerfectField.ofCharZero`: all fields of characteristic zero are perfect.
* `PerfectField.ofFinite`: all finite fields are perfect.
* `PerfectField.separable_iff_squarefree`: a polynomial over a perfect field is separable iff
it is square-free.
* `Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isSeparable_of_perfectField`, `Algebra.IsAlgebraic.perfectField`:
if `L / K` is an algebraic extension, `K` is a perfect field, then `L / K` is separable,
and `L` is also a perfect field.
-/
open Function Polynomial
/-- A perfect ring of characteristic `p` (prime) in the sense of Serre.
NB: This is not related to the concept with the same name introduced by Bass (related to projective
covers of modules). -/
class PerfectRing (R : Type*) (p : ℕ) [CommSemiring R] [ExpChar R p] : Prop where
/-- A ring is perfect if the Frobenius map is bijective. -/
bijective_frobenius : Bijective <| frobenius R p
section PerfectRing
variable (R : Type*) (p m n : ℕ) [CommSemiring R] [ExpChar R p]
/-- For a reduced ring, surjectivity of the Frobenius map is a sufficient condition for perfection.
-/
lemma PerfectRing.ofSurjective (R : Type*) (p : ℕ) [CommRing R] [ExpChar R p]
[IsReduced R] (h : Surjective <| frobenius R p) : PerfectRing R p :=
⟨frobenius_inj R p, h⟩
#align perfect_ring.of_surjective PerfectRing.ofSurjective
instance PerfectRing.ofFiniteOfIsReduced (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [ExpChar R p]
[Finite R] [IsReduced R] : PerfectRing R p :=
ofSurjective _ _ <| Finite.surjective_of_injective (frobenius_inj R p)
variable [PerfectRing R p]
@[simp]
theorem bijective_frobenius : Bijective (frobenius R p) := PerfectRing.bijective_frobenius
theorem bijective_iterateFrobenius : Bijective (iterateFrobenius R p n) :=
coe_iterateFrobenius R p n ▸ (bijective_frobenius R p).iterate n
@[simp]
theorem injective_frobenius : Injective (frobenius R p) := (bijective_frobenius R p).1
@[simp]
theorem surjective_frobenius : Surjective (frobenius R p) := (bijective_frobenius R p).2
/-- The Frobenius automorphism for a perfect ring. -/
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def frobeniusEquiv : R ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective (frobenius R p) PerfectRing.bijective_frobenius
#align frobenius_equiv frobeniusEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_frobeniusEquiv : ⇑(frobeniusEquiv R p) = frobenius R p := rfl
#align coe_frobenius_equiv coe_frobeniusEquiv
theorem frobeniusEquiv_def (x : R) : frobeniusEquiv R p x = x ^ p := rfl
/-- The iterated Frobenius automorphism for a perfect ring. -/
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def iterateFrobeniusEquiv : R ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective (iterateFrobenius R p n) (bijective_iterateFrobenius R p n)
@[simp]
theorem coe_iterateFrobeniusEquiv : ⇑(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n) = iterateFrobenius R p n := rfl
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n x = x ^ p ^ n := rfl
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n) x =
iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n x) :=
iterateFrobenius_add_apply R p m n x
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n) =
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).trans (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m) :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply R p m n)
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply (x : R) : (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n)).symm x =
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m).symm ((iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).symm x) :=
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n)).injective <| by rw [RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply, add_comm,
iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add : (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n)).symm =
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).symm.trans (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m).symm :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply R p m n)
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_zero_apply (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 0 x = x := by
rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, pow_zero, pow_one]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_one_apply (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 1 x = x ^ p := by
rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_zero : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 0 = RingEquiv.refl R :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_zero_apply R p)
@[simp]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_one : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 1 = frobeniusEquiv R p :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_one_apply R p)
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_eq_pow : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n = frobeniusEquiv R p ^ n :=
DFunLike.ext' <| show _ = ⇑(RingAut.toPerm _ _) by
rw [map_pow, Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact (pow_iterate p n).symm
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm :
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).symm = (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm ^ n := by
rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_eq_pow]; exact (inv_pow _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem frobeniusEquiv_symm_apply_frobenius (x : R) :
(frobeniusEquiv R p).symm (frobenius R p x) = x :=
leftInverse_surjInv PerfectRing.bijective_frobenius x
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_apply_frobeniusEquiv_symm (x : R) :
frobenius R p ((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm x) = x :=
surjInv_eq _ _
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_comp_frobeniusEquiv_symm :
(frobenius R p).comp (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm = RingHom.id R := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem frobeniusEquiv_symm_comp_frobenius :
((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm : R →+* R).comp (frobenius R p) = RingHom.id R := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem frobeniusEquiv_symm_pow_p (x : R) : ((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm x) ^ p = x :=
frobenius_apply_frobeniusEquiv_symm R p x
theorem injective_pow_p {x y : R} (h : x ^ p = y ^ p) : x = y := (frobeniusEquiv R p).injective h
#align injective_pow_p injective_pow_p
lemma polynomial_expand_eq (f : R[X]) :
expand R p f = (f.map (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm) ^ p := by
rw [← (f.map (S := R) (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm).expand_char p, map_expand, map_map,
frobenius_comp_frobeniusEquiv_symm, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_expand (R p) [CommSemiring R] [Fact p.Prime] [CharP R p] [PerfectRing R p]
(f : R[X]) : ¬ Irreducible (expand R p f) := by
rw [polynomial_expand_eq]
exact not_irreducible_pow (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
instance instPerfectRingProd (S : Type*) [CommSemiring S] [ExpChar S p] [PerfectRing S p] :
PerfectRing (R × S) p where
bijective_frobenius := (bijective_frobenius R p).prodMap (bijective_frobenius S p)
end PerfectRing
/-- A perfect field.
See also `PerfectRing` for a generalisation in positive characteristic. -/
class PerfectField (K : Type*) [Field K] : Prop where
/-- A field is perfect if every irreducible polynomial is separable. -/
separable_of_irreducible : ∀ {f : K[X]}, Irreducible f → f.Separable
lemma PerfectRing.toPerfectField (K : Type*) (p : ℕ)
[Field K] [ExpChar K p] [PerfectRing K p] : PerfectField K := by
obtain hp | ⟨hp⟩ := ‹ExpChar K p›
· exact ⟨Irreducible.separable⟩
refine PerfectField.mk fun hf ↦ ?_
rcases separable_or p hf with h | ⟨-, g, -, rfl⟩
· assumption
· exfalso; revert hf; haveI := Fact.mk hp; simp
namespace PerfectField
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
instance ofCharZero [CharZero K] : PerfectField K := ⟨Irreducible.separable⟩
instance ofFinite [Finite K] : PerfectField K := by
obtain ⟨p, _instP⟩ := CharP.exists K
have : Fact p.Prime := ⟨CharP.char_is_prime K p⟩
exact PerfectRing.toPerfectField K p
variable [PerfectField K]
/-- A perfect field of characteristic `p` (prime) is a perfect ring. -/
instance toPerfectRing (p : ℕ) [ExpChar K p] : PerfectRing K p := by
refine PerfectRing.ofSurjective _ _ fun y ↦ ?_
let f : K[X] := X ^ p - C y
let L := f.SplittingField
let ι := algebraMap K L
have hf_deg : f.degree ≠ 0 := by
rw [degree_X_pow_sub_C (expChar_pos K p) y, p.cast_ne_zero]; exact (expChar_pos K p).ne'
let a : L := f.rootOfSplits ι (SplittingField.splits f) hf_deg
have hfa : aeval a f = 0 := by rw [aeval_def, map_rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) hf_deg]
have ha_pow : a ^ p = ι y := by rwa [AlgHom.map_sub, aeval_X_pow, aeval_C, sub_eq_zero] at hfa
let g : K[X] := minpoly K a
suffices (g.map ι).natDegree = 1 by
rw [g.natDegree_map, ← degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos Nat.one_pos] at this
obtain ⟨a' : K, ha' : ι a' = a⟩ := minpoly.mem_range_of_degree_eq_one K a this
refine ⟨a', NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective K L ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_frobenius, ha', frobenius_def, ha_pow]
have hg_dvd : g.map ι ∣ (X - C a) ^ p := by
convert Polynomial.map_dvd ι (minpoly.dvd K a hfa)
rw [sub_pow_expChar, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X, map_C, ← ha_pow, map_pow]
have ha : IsIntegral K a := .of_finite K a
have hg_pow : g.map ι = (X - C a) ^ (g.map ι).natDegree := by
obtain ⟨q, -, hq⟩ := (dvd_prime_pow (prime_X_sub_C a) p).mp hg_dvd
rw [eq_of_monic_of_associated ((minpoly.monic ha).map ι) ((monic_X_sub_C a).pow q) hq,
natDegree_pow, natDegree_X_sub_C, mul_one]
have hg_sep : (g.map ι).Separable := (separable_of_irreducible <| minpoly.irreducible ha).map
rw [hg_pow] at hg_sep
refine (Separable.of_pow (not_isUnit_X_sub_C a) ?_ hg_sep).2
rw [g.natDegree_map ι, ← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos]
exact minpoly.degree_pos ha
theorem separable_iff_squarefree {g : K[X]} : g.Separable ↔ Squarefree g := by
refine ⟨Separable.squarefree, fun sqf ↦ isCoprime_of_irreducible_dvd (sqf.ne_zero ·.1) ?_⟩
rintro p (h : Irreducible p) ⟨q, rfl⟩ (dvd : p ∣ derivative (p * q))
replace dvd : p ∣ q := by
rw [derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right p _)] at dvd
exact (separable_of_irreducible h).dvd_of_dvd_mul_left dvd
exact (h.1 : ¬ IsUnit p) (sqf _ <| mul_dvd_mul_left _ dvd)
end PerfectField
/-- If `L / K` is an algebraic extension, `K` is a perfect field, then `L / K` is separable. -/
instance Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isSeparable_of_perfectField {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L]
[Algebra K L] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] [PerfectField K] : IsSeparable K L :=
⟨fun x ↦ PerfectField.separable_of_irreducible <|
minpoly.irreducible (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral x)⟩
/-- If `L / K` is an algebraic extension, `K` is a perfect field, then so is `L`. -/
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.perfectField {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] [PerfectField K] : PerfectField L := ⟨fun {f} hf ↦ by
obtain ⟨_, _, hi, h⟩ := hf.exists_dvd_monic_irreducible_of_isIntegral (K := K)
exact (PerfectField.separable_of_irreducible hi).map |>.of_dvd h⟩
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (p n : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] (f : R[X])
open Multiset
theorem roots_expand_pow_map_iterateFrobenius_le :
(expand R (p ^ n) f).roots.map (iterateFrobenius R p n) ≤ p ^ n • f.roots := by
classical
refine le_iff_count.2 fun r ↦ ?_
by_cases h : ∃ s, r = s ^ p ^ n
· obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := h
simp_rw [count_nsmul, count_roots, ← rootMultiplicity_expand_pow, ← count_roots, count_map,
count_eq_card_filter_eq]
exact card_le_card (monotone_filter_right _ fun _ h ↦ iterateFrobenius_inj R p n h)
convert Nat.zero_le _
simp_rw [count_map, card_eq_zero]
exact ext' fun t ↦ count_zero t ▸ count_filter_of_neg fun h' ↦ h ⟨t, h'⟩
theorem roots_expand_map_frobenius_le :
(expand R p f).roots.map (frobenius R p) ≤ p • f.roots := by
rw [← iterateFrobenius_one]
convert ← roots_expand_pow_map_iterateFrobenius_le p 1 f <;> apply pow_one
theorem roots_expand_pow_image_iterateFrobenius_subset [DecidableEq R] :
(expand R (p ^ n) f).roots.toFinset.image (iterateFrobenius R p n) ⊆ f.roots.toFinset := by
rw [Finset.image_toFinset, ← (roots f).toFinset_nsmul _ (expChar_pow_pos R p n).ne',
toFinset_subset]
exact subset_of_le (roots_expand_pow_map_iterateFrobenius_le p n f)
theorem roots_expand_image_frobenius_subset [DecidableEq R] :
(expand R p f).roots.toFinset.image (frobenius R p) ⊆ f.roots.toFinset := by
rw [← iterateFrobenius_one]
convert ← roots_expand_pow_image_iterateFrobenius_subset p 1 f
apply pow_one
variable {p n f}
variable [PerfectRing R p]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Perfect.lean | 300 | 306 | theorem roots_expand_pow :
(expand R (p ^ n) f).roots = p ^ n • f.roots.map (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).symm := by |
classical
refine ext' fun r ↦ ?_
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_expand_pow, ← count_roots, count_nsmul, count_map,
count_eq_card_filter_eq]; congr; ext
exact (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).eq_symm_apply.symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Density
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.regularity.uniform from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf7ef0e83e5b7e6c1169e97f055e58a2e4e9d52d"
/-!
# Graph uniformity and uniform partitions
In this file we define uniformity of a pair of vertices in a graph and uniformity of a partition of
vertices of a graph. Both are also known as ε-regularity.
Finsets of vertices `s` and `t` are `ε`-uniform in a graph `G` if their edge density is at most
`ε`-far from the density of any big enough `s'` and `t'` where `s' ⊆ s`, `t' ⊆ t`.
The definition is pretty technical, but it amounts to the edges between `s` and `t` being "random"
The literature contains several definitions which are equivalent up to scaling `ε` by some constant
when the partition is equitable.
A partition `P` of the vertices is `ε`-uniform if the proportion of non `ε`-uniform pairs of parts
is less than `ε`.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.IsUniform`: Graph uniformity of a pair of finsets of vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness`: `G.nonuniformWitness ε s t` and `G.nonuniformWitness ε t s`
together witness the non-uniformity of `s` and `t`.
* `Finpartition.nonUniforms`: Non uniform pairs of parts of a partition.
* `Finpartition.IsUniform`: Uniformity of a partition.
* `Finpartition.nonuniformWitnesses`: For each non-uniform pair of parts of a partition, pick
witnesses of non-uniformity and dump them all together.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset
variable {α 𝕜 : Type*} [LinearOrderedField 𝕜]
/-! ### Graph uniformity -/
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (ε : 𝕜) {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- A pair of finsets of vertices is `ε`-uniform (aka `ε`-regular) iff their edge density is close
to the density of any big enough pair of subsets. Intuitively, the edges between them are
random-like. -/
def IsUniform (s t : Finset α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃s'⦄, s' ⊆ s → ∀ ⦃t'⦄, t' ⊆ t → (s.card : 𝕜) * ε ≤ s'.card →
(t.card : 𝕜) * ε ≤ t'.card → |(G.edgeDensity s' t' : 𝕜) - (G.edgeDensity s t : 𝕜)| < ε
#align simple_graph.is_uniform SimpleGraph.IsUniform
variable {G ε}
instance IsUniform.instDecidableRel : DecidableRel (G.IsUniform ε) := by
unfold IsUniform; infer_instance
theorem IsUniform.mono {ε' : 𝕜} (h : ε ≤ ε') (hε : IsUniform G ε s t) : IsUniform G ε' s t :=
fun s' hs' t' ht' hs ht => by
refine (hε hs' ht' (le_trans ?_ hs) (le_trans ?_ ht)).trans_le h <;> gcongr
#align simple_graph.is_uniform.mono SimpleGraph.IsUniform.mono
theorem IsUniform.symm : Symmetric (IsUniform G ε) := fun s t h t' ht' s' hs' ht hs => by
rw [edgeDensity_comm _ t', edgeDensity_comm _ t]
exact h hs' ht' hs ht
#align simple_graph.is_uniform.symm SimpleGraph.IsUniform.symm
variable (G)
theorem isUniform_comm : IsUniform G ε s t ↔ IsUniform G ε t s :=
⟨fun h => h.symm, fun h => h.symm⟩
#align simple_graph.is_uniform_comm SimpleGraph.isUniform_comm
lemma isUniform_one : G.IsUniform (1 : 𝕜) s t := by
intro s' hs' t' ht' hs ht
rw [mul_one] at hs ht
rw [eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs' (Nat.cast_le.1 hs),
eq_of_subset_of_card_le ht' (Nat.cast_le.1 ht), sub_self, abs_zero]
exact zero_lt_one
#align simple_graph.is_uniform_one SimpleGraph.isUniform_one
variable {G}
lemma IsUniform.pos (hG : G.IsUniform ε s t) : 0 < ε :=
not_le.1 fun hε ↦ (hε.trans $ abs_nonneg _).not_lt $ hG (empty_subset _) (empty_subset _)
(by simpa using mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (Nat.cast_nonneg _) hε)
(by simpa using mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (Nat.cast_nonneg _) hε)
@[simp] lemma isUniform_singleton : G.IsUniform ε {a} {b} ↔ 0 < ε := by
refine ⟨IsUniform.pos, fun hε s' hs' t' ht' hs ht ↦ ?_⟩
rw [card_singleton, Nat.cast_one, one_mul] at hs ht
obtain rfl | rfl := Finset.subset_singleton_iff.1 hs'
· replace hs : ε ≤ 0 := by simpa using hs
exact (hε.not_le hs).elim
obtain rfl | rfl := Finset.subset_singleton_iff.1 ht'
· replace ht : ε ≤ 0 := by simpa using ht
exact (hε.not_le ht).elim
· rwa [sub_self, abs_zero]
#align simple_graph.is_uniform_singleton SimpleGraph.isUniform_singleton
theorem not_isUniform_zero : ¬G.IsUniform (0 : 𝕜) s t := fun h =>
(abs_nonneg _).not_lt <| h (empty_subset _) (empty_subset _) (by simp) (by simp)
#align simple_graph.not_is_uniform_zero SimpleGraph.not_isUniform_zero
theorem not_isUniform_iff :
¬G.IsUniform ε s t ↔ ∃ s', s' ⊆ s ∧ ∃ t', t' ⊆ t ∧ ↑s.card * ε ≤ s'.card ∧
↑t.card * ε ≤ t'.card ∧ ε ≤ |G.edgeDensity s' t' - G.edgeDensity s t| := by
unfold IsUniform
simp only [not_forall, not_lt, exists_prop, exists_and_left, Rat.cast_abs, Rat.cast_sub]
#align simple_graph.not_is_uniform_iff SimpleGraph.not_isUniform_iff
open scoped Classical
variable (G)
/-- An arbitrary pair of subsets witnessing the non-uniformity of `(s, t)`. If `(s, t)` is uniform,
returns `(s, t)`. Witnesses for `(s, t)` and `(t, s)` don't necessarily match. See
`SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness`. -/
noncomputable def nonuniformWitnesses (ε : 𝕜) (s t : Finset α) : Finset α × Finset α :=
if h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t then
((not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose, (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose)
else (s, t)
#align simple_graph.nonuniform_witnesses SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitnesses
theorem left_nonuniformWitnesses_subset (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
(G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1 ⊆ s := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.1
#align simple_graph.left_nonuniform_witnesses_subset SimpleGraph.left_nonuniformWitnesses_subset
theorem left_nonuniformWitnesses_card (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
(s.card : 𝕜) * ε ≤ (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1.card := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.2.1
#align simple_graph.left_nonuniform_witnesses_card SimpleGraph.left_nonuniformWitnesses_card
theorem right_nonuniformWitnesses_subset (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
(G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).2 ⊆ t := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.1
#align simple_graph.right_nonuniform_witnesses_subset SimpleGraph.right_nonuniformWitnesses_subset
theorem right_nonuniformWitnesses_card (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
(t.card : 𝕜) * ε ≤ (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).2.card := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.2.2.1
#align simple_graph.right_nonuniform_witnesses_card SimpleGraph.right_nonuniformWitnesses_card
theorem nonuniformWitnesses_spec (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
ε ≤
|G.edgeDensity (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1 (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).2 -
G.edgeDensity s t| := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.2.2.2
#align simple_graph.nonuniform_witnesses_spec SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitnesses_spec
/-- Arbitrary witness of non-uniformity. `G.nonuniformWitness ε s t` and
`G.nonuniformWitness ε t s` form a pair of subsets witnessing the non-uniformity of `(s, t)`. If
`(s, t)` is uniform, returns `s`. -/
noncomputable def nonuniformWitness (ε : 𝕜) (s t : Finset α) : Finset α :=
if WellOrderingRel s t then (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1 else (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε t s).2
#align simple_graph.nonuniform_witness SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness
theorem nonuniformWitness_subset (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) : G.nonuniformWitness ε s t ⊆ s := by
unfold nonuniformWitness
split_ifs
· exact G.left_nonuniformWitnesses_subset h
· exact G.right_nonuniformWitnesses_subset fun i => h i.symm
#align simple_graph.nonuniform_witness_subset SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness_subset
theorem le_card_nonuniformWitness (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
(s.card : 𝕜) * ε ≤ (G.nonuniformWitness ε s t).card := by
unfold nonuniformWitness
split_ifs
· exact G.left_nonuniformWitnesses_card h
· exact G.right_nonuniformWitnesses_card fun i => h i.symm
#align simple_graph.le_card_nonuniform_witness SimpleGraph.le_card_nonuniformWitness
theorem nonuniformWitness_spec (h₁ : s ≠ t) (h₂ : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) : ε ≤ |G.edgeDensity
(G.nonuniformWitness ε s t) (G.nonuniformWitness ε t s) - G.edgeDensity s t| := by
unfold nonuniformWitness
rcases trichotomous_of WellOrderingRel s t with (lt | rfl | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt, if_neg (asymm lt)]
exact G.nonuniformWitnesses_spec h₂
· cases h₁ rfl
· rw [if_neg (asymm gt), if_pos gt, edgeDensity_comm, edgeDensity_comm _ s]
apply G.nonuniformWitnesses_spec fun i => h₂ i.symm
#align simple_graph.nonuniform_witness_spec SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness_spec
end SimpleGraph
/-! ### Uniform partitions -/
variable [DecidableEq α] {A : Finset α} (P : Finpartition A) (G : SimpleGraph α)
[DecidableRel G.Adj] {ε δ : 𝕜} {u v : Finset α}
namespace Finpartition
/-- The pairs of parts of a partition `P` which are not `ε`-dense in a graph `G`. Note that we
dismiss the diagonal. We do not care whether `s` is `ε`-dense with itself. -/
def sparsePairs (ε : 𝕜) : Finset (Finset α × Finset α) :=
P.parts.offDiag.filter fun (u, v) ↦ G.edgeDensity u v < ε
@[simp]
lemma mk_mem_sparsePairs (u v : Finset α) (ε : 𝕜) :
(u, v) ∈ P.sparsePairs G ε ↔ u ∈ P.parts ∧ v ∈ P.parts ∧ u ≠ v ∧ G.edgeDensity u v < ε := by
rw [sparsePairs, mem_filter, mem_offDiag, and_assoc, and_assoc]
lemma sparsePairs_mono {ε ε' : 𝕜} (h : ε ≤ ε') : P.sparsePairs G ε ⊆ P.sparsePairs G ε' :=
monotone_filter_right _ fun _ ↦ h.trans_lt'
/-- The pairs of parts of a partition `P` which are not `ε`-uniform in a graph `G`. Note that we
dismiss the diagonal. We do not care whether `s` is `ε`-uniform with itself. -/
def nonUniforms (ε : 𝕜) : Finset (Finset α × Finset α) :=
P.parts.offDiag.filter fun (u, v) ↦ ¬G.IsUniform ε u v
#align finpartition.non_uniforms Finpartition.nonUniforms
@[simp] lemma mk_mem_nonUniforms :
(u, v) ∈ P.nonUniforms G ε ↔ u ∈ P.parts ∧ v ∈ P.parts ∧ u ≠ v ∧ ¬G.IsUniform ε u v := by
rw [nonUniforms, mem_filter, mem_offDiag, and_assoc, and_assoc]
#align finpartition.mk_mem_non_uniforms_iff Finpartition.mk_mem_nonUniforms
theorem nonUniforms_mono {ε ε' : 𝕜} (h : ε ≤ ε') : P.nonUniforms G ε' ⊆ P.nonUniforms G ε :=
monotone_filter_right _ fun _ => mt <| SimpleGraph.IsUniform.mono h
#align finpartition.non_uniforms_mono Finpartition.nonUniforms_mono
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Uniform.lean | 239 | 245 | theorem nonUniforms_bot (hε : 0 < ε) : (⊥ : Finpartition A).nonUniforms G ε = ∅ := by |
rw [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
rintro ⟨u, v⟩
simp only [mk_mem_nonUniforms, parts_bot, mem_map, not_and,
Classical.not_not, exists_imp]; dsimp
rintro x ⟨_, rfl⟩ y ⟨_,rfl⟩ _
rwa [SimpleGraph.isUniform_singleton]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Filtered
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
#align_import category_theory.limits.opposites from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ac3ae212f394f508df43e37aa093722fa9b65d31"
/-!
# Limits in `C` give colimits in `Cᵒᵖ`.
We also give special cases for (co)products,
(co)equalizers, and pullbacks / pushouts.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {J : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J]
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cocone_op CategoryTheory.Limits.IsColimit.op
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_op CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.op
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.IsColimit.unop
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.unop
-- 2024-03-26
@[deprecated] alias isLimitCoconeOp := IsColimit.op
@[deprecated] alias isColimitConeOp := IsLimit.op
@[deprecated] alias isLimitCoconeUnop := IsColimit.unop
@[deprecated] alias isColimitConeUnop := IsLimit.unop
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeLeftOpOfCocone (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneLeftOpOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeLeftOp s)).unop
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by
simp only [coneLeftOpOfCocone_π_app, op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac,
coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app, op_unop]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac, coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_left_op_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeLeftOpOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit of `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a colimit of `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeLeftOpOfCone (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeLeftOpOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeLeftOp s)).unop
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by
simp only [coconeLeftOpOfCone_ι_app, op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac,
coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app, op_unop]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac, coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_left_op_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeLeftOpOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a limit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeRightOpOfCocone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneRightOpOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeRightOp s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_right_op_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeRightOpOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a colimit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeRightOpOfCone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeRightOpOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeRightOp s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_right_op_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeRightOpOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeUnopOfCocone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneUnopOfCocone c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeOfConeUnop s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_unop_of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeUnopOfCocone
/-- Turn a limit of `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a colimit of `F.unop : J ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeUnopOfCone (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeUnopOfCone c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneOfCoconeUnop s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_unop_of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeUnopOfCone
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a limit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F.leftOp} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeLeftOp c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeLeftOpOfCone s)).op
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by
simp only [coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac,
coconeLeftOpOfCone_ι_app, unop_op]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac, coneOfCoconeLeftOp_π_app] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp
/-- Turn a limit of `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` into a colimit of `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F.leftOp} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeLeftOp c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneLeftOpOfCocone s)).op
fac s j :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by
simp only [coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac,
coneLeftOpOfCocone_π_app, unop_op]
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac, coconeOfConeLeftOp_ι_app] using w (unop j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_of_cone_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeRightOp (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cocone F.rightOp} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeRightOp c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeRightOpOfCone s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsColimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_right_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeRightOp
/-- Turn a limit for `F.rightOp : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitCoconeOfConeRightOp (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C) {c : Cone F.rightOp} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeRightOp c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneRightOpOfCocone s)).unop
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.op_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.op_unop, IsLimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cocone_of_cone_right_op CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoconeOfConeRightOp
/-- Turn a colimit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C` into a limit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfCoconeUnop (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cocone F.unop} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsLimit (coneOfCoconeUnop c) where
lift s := (hc.desc (coconeUnopOfCone s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_cone_of_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitConeOfCoconeUnop
/-- Turn a limit for `F.unop : J ⥤ C` into a colimit for `F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def isColimitConeOfCoconeUnop (F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) {c : Cone F.unop} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsColimit (coconeOfConeUnop c) where
desc s := (hc.lift (coneUnopOfCocone s)).op
fac s j := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
uniq s m w := by
refine Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext fun j => Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)
simpa only [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac] using w (op j)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cone_of_cocone_unop CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitConeOfCoconeUnop
/-- If `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` has a colimit, we can construct a limit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
theorem hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) [HasColimit F.leftOp] : HasLimit F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := coneOfCoconeLeftOp (colimit.cocone F.leftOp)
isLimit := isLimitConeOfCoconeLeftOp _ (colimit.isColimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_colimit_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp
theorem hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F.op] : HasLimit F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (colimit.cocone F.op).unop
isLimit := (colimit.isColimit _).unop }
theorem hasLimit_op_of_hasColimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : HasLimit F.op :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (colimit.cocone F).op
isLimit := (colimit.isColimit _).op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_colimit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `Jᵒᵖ`, we can construct limits in `Cᵒᵖ` of shape `J`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape [HasColimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] :
HasLimitsOfShape J Cᵒᵖ :=
{ has_limit := fun F => hasLimit_of_hasColimit_leftOp F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_op_of_has_colimits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op [HasColimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ] :
HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
{ has_limit := fun F => hasLimit_of_hasColimit_op F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_of_has_colimits_of_shape_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op
attribute [local instance] hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
/-- If `C` has colimits, we can construct limits for `Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
instance hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits [HasColimits C] : HasLimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_op_of_has_colimits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits
theorem hasLimits_of_hasColimits_op [HasColimits Cᵒᵖ] : HasLimits C :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := fun _ _ => hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_has_colimits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimits_of_hasColimits_op
instance has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits [HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C] :
HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ where
HasLimitsOfShape _ _ _ := hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
#align category_theory.limits.has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits CategoryTheory.Limits.has_cofiltered_limits_op_of_has_filtered_colimits
theorem has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op [HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ] :
HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C :=
{ HasLimitsOfShape := fun _ _ _ => hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.has_cofiltered_limits_of_has_filtered_colimits_op
/-- If `F.leftOp : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` has a limit, we can construct a colimit for `F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp (F : J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ) [HasLimit F.leftOp] : HasColimit F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := coconeOfConeLeftOp (limit.cone F.leftOp)
isColimit := isColimitCoconeOfConeLeftOp _ (limit.isLimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_has_limit_left_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp
theorem hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F.op] : HasColimit F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (limit.cone F.op).unop
isColimit := (limit.isLimit _).unop }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_has_limit_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op
theorem hasColimit_op_of_hasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : HasColimit F.op :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (limit.cone F).op
isColimit := (limit.isLimit _).op }
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `Jᵒᵖ`, we can construct limits in `Cᵒᵖ` of shape `J`.
-/
instance hasColimitsOfShape_op_of_hasLimitsOfShape [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] :
HasColimitsOfShape J Cᵒᵖ where has_colimit F := hasColimit_of_hasLimit_leftOp F
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape_op_of_has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitsOfShape_op_of_hasLimitsOfShape
theorem hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ] :
HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
{ has_colimit := fun F => hasColimit_of_hasLimit_op F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape_of_has_limits_of_shape_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op
/-- If `C` has limits, we can construct colimits for `Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
instance hasColimits_op_of_hasLimits [HasLimits C] : HasColimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_op_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimits_op_of_hasLimits
theorem hasColimits_of_hasLimits_op [HasLimits Cᵒᵖ] : HasColimits C :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := fun _ _ => hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_has_limits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimits_of_hasLimits_op
instance has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits [HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C] :
HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ where HasColimitsOfShape _ _ _ := inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.has_filtered_colimits_op_of_has_cofiltered_limits
theorem has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op [HasCofilteredLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} Cᵒᵖ] :
HasFilteredColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C :=
{ HasColimitsOfShape := fun _ _ _ => hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op }
#align category_theory.limits.has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op CategoryTheory.Limits.has_filtered_colimits_of_has_cofiltered_limits_op
variable (X : Type v₂)
/-- If `C` has products indexed by `X`, then `Cᵒᵖ` has coproducts indexed by `X`.
-/
instance hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite [HasProductsOfShape X C] : HasCoproductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_shape_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite
theorem hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite [HasProductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ] : HasCoproductsOfShape X C :=
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
hasColimitsOfShape_of_hasLimitsOfShape_op
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_shape_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite
/-- If `C` has coproducts indexed by `X`, then `Cᵒᵖ` has products indexed by `X`.
-/
instance hasProductsOfShape_opposite [HasCoproductsOfShape X C] : HasProductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_shape_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProductsOfShape_opposite
theorem hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite [HasCoproductsOfShape X Cᵒᵖ] : HasProductsOfShape X C :=
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete X)ᵒᵖ Cᵒᵖ :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.opposite X).symm
hasLimitsOfShape_of_hasColimitsOfShape_op
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_shape_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite
instance hasProducts_opposite [HasCoproducts.{v₂} C] : HasProducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ := fun _ =>
inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProducts_opposite
theorem hasProducts_of_opposite [HasCoproducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ] : HasProducts.{v₂} C := fun X =>
hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite X
#align category_theory.limits.has_products_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProducts_of_opposite
instance hasCoproducts_opposite [HasProducts.{v₂} C] : HasCoproducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ := fun _ =>
inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproducts_opposite
theorem hasCoproducts_of_opposite [HasProducts.{v₂} Cᵒᵖ] : HasCoproducts.{v₂} C := fun X =>
hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite X
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproducts_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproducts_of_opposite
instance hasFiniteCoproducts_opposite [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteCoproducts Cᵒᵖ where
out _ := Limits.hasCoproductsOfShape_opposite _
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_opposite
theorem hasFiniteCoproducts_of_opposite [HasFiniteProducts Cᵒᵖ] : HasFiniteCoproducts C :=
{ out := fun _ => hasCoproductsOfShape_of_opposite _ }
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_of_opposite
instance hasFiniteProducts_opposite [HasFiniteCoproducts C] : HasFiniteProducts Cᵒᵖ where
out _ := inferInstance
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_opposite
theorem hasFiniteProducts_of_opposite [HasFiniteCoproducts Cᵒᵖ] : HasFiniteProducts C :=
{ out := fun _ => hasProductsOfShape_of_opposite _ }
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_of_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_of_opposite
section OppositeCoproducts
variable {α : Type*} {Z : α → C} [HasCoproduct Z]
instance : HasLimit (Discrete.functor Z).op := hasLimit_op_of_hasColimit (Discrete.functor Z)
instance : HasLimit ((Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op) :=
hasLimitEquivalenceComp (Discrete.opposite α).symm
instance : HasProduct (op <| Z ·) := hasLimitOfIso
((Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ by rfl)) :
(Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op ≅
Discrete.functor (op <| Z ·))
/-- A `Cofan` gives a `Fan` in the opposite category. -/
@[simp]
def Cofan.op (c : Cofan Z) : Fan (op <| Z ·) := Fan.mk _ (fun a ↦ (c.inj a).op)
/-- If a `Cofan` is colimit, then its opposite is limit. -/
def Cofan.IsColimit.op {c : Cofan Z} (hc : IsColimit c) : IsLimit c.op := by
let e : Discrete.functor (Opposite.op <| Z ·) ≅ (Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙
(Discrete.functor Z).op := Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
refine IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ((IsLimit.postcomposeInvEquiv e _).2
(IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.op (Discrete.opposite α).symm))
(Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ ?_))
dsimp
erw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
rfl
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of an abstract coproduct to the corresponding product
in the opposite category.
-/
def opCoproductIsoProduct' {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) : op c.pt ≅ f.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (Cofan.IsColimit.op hc) hf
variable (Z) in
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of the coproduct to the product in the opposite
category.
-/
def opCoproductIsoProduct :
op (∐ Z) ≅ ∏ᶜ (op <| Z ·) :=
opCoproductIsoProduct' (coproductIsCoproduct Z) (productIsProduct (op <| Z ·))
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) (b : α) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).inv ≫ (c.inj b).op = f.proj b :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp (Cofan.IsColimit.op hc) hf ⟨b⟩
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct'_comp_self {c c' : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc' : IsColimit c') (hf : IsLimit f) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).hom ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct' hc' hf).inv =
(hc.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc').op.inv := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
apply hc'.hom_ext
intro ⟨j⟩
change c'.inj _ ≫ _ = _
simp only [unop_op, unop_comp, Discrete.functor_obj, const_obj_obj, Iso.op_inv,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv]
apply Quiver.Hom.op_inj
simp only [op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, Category.assoc,
opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj]
rw [← opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj hc hf]
simp only [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
rfl
variable (Z) in
theorem opCoproductIsoProduct_inv_comp_ι (b : α) :
(opCoproductIsoProduct Z).inv ≫ (Sigma.ι Z b).op = Pi.π (op <| Z ·) b :=
opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj _ _ b
theorem desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct'_hom {c : Cofan Z} {f : Fan (op <| Z ·)}
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : IsLimit f) (c' : Cofan Z) :
(hc.desc c').op ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct' hc hf).hom = hf.lift c'.op := by
refine (Iso.eq_comp_inv _).mp (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hc.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)))
simp only [unop_op, Discrete.functor_obj, const_obj_obj, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsColimit.fac,
Cofan.op, unop_comp, op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, Category.assoc]
erw [opCoproductIsoProduct'_inv_comp_inj, IsLimit.fac]
rfl
theorem desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct_hom {X : C} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) :
(Sigma.desc π).op ≫ (opCoproductIsoProduct Z).hom = Pi.lift (fun a ↦ (π a).op) := by
convert desc_op_comp_opCoproductIsoProduct'_hom (coproductIsCoproduct Z)
(productIsProduct (op <| Z ·)) (Cofan.mk _ π)
· ext; simp [Sigma.desc, coproductIsCoproduct]
· ext; simp [Pi.lift, productIsProduct]
end OppositeCoproducts
section OppositeProducts
variable {α : Type*} {Z : α → C} [HasProduct Z]
instance : HasColimit (Discrete.functor Z).op := hasColimit_op_of_hasLimit (Discrete.functor Z)
instance : HasColimit ((Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op) :=
hasColimit_equivalence_comp (Discrete.opposite α).symm
instance : HasCoproduct (op <| Z ·) := hasColimitOfIso
((Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ by rfl)) :
(Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙ (Discrete.functor Z).op ≅
Discrete.functor (op <| Z ·)).symm
/-- A `Fan` gives a `Cofan` in the opposite category. -/
@[simp]
def Fan.op (f : Fan Z) : Cofan (op <| Z ·) := Cofan.mk _ (fun a ↦ (f.proj a).op)
/-- If a `Fan` is limit, then its opposite is colimit. -/
def Fan.IsLimit.op {f : Fan Z} (hf : IsLimit f) : IsColimit f.op := by
let e : Discrete.functor (Opposite.op <| Z ·) ≅ (Discrete.opposite α).inverse ⋙
(Discrete.functor Z).op := Discrete.natIso (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
refine IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ((IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv e _).2
(IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hf.op (Discrete.opposite α).symm))
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ ?_))
dsimp
erw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
rfl
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of an abstract product to the corresponding coproduct
in the opposite category.
-/
def opProductIsoCoproduct' {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) : op f.pt ≅ c.pt :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (Fan.IsLimit.op hf) hc
variable (Z) in
/--
The canonical isomorphism from the opposite of the product to the coproduct in the opposite
category.
-/
def opProductIsoCoproduct :
op (∏ᶜ Z) ≅ ∐ (op <| Z ·) :=
opProductIsoCoproduct' (productIsProduct Z) (coproductIsCoproduct (op <| Z ·))
theorem proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) (b : α) :
(f.proj b).op ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).hom = c.inj b :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (Fan.IsLimit.op hf) hc ⟨b⟩
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct'_comp_self {f f' : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hf' : IsLimit f') (hc : IsColimit c) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).hom ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct' hf' hc).inv =
(hf.conePointUniqueUpToIso hf').op.inv := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
apply hf.hom_ext
intro ⟨j⟩
change _ ≫ f.proj _ = _
simp only [unop_op, unop_comp, Category.assoc, Discrete.functor_obj, Iso.op_inv,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp]
apply Quiver.Hom.op_inj
simp only [op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom]
rw [← proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom hf' hc]
simp only [Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
rfl
variable (Z) in
theorem π_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct_hom (b : α) :
(Pi.π Z b).op ≫ (opProductIsoCoproduct Z).hom = Sigma.ι (op <| Z ·) b :=
proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom _ _ b
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct'_inv_comp_lift {f : Fan Z} {c : Cofan (op <| Z ·)}
(hf : IsLimit f) (hc : IsColimit c) (f' : Fan Z) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct' hf hc).inv ≫ (hf.lift f').op = hc.desc f'.op := by
refine (Iso.inv_comp_eq _).mpr (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (hf.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ Quiver.Hom.op_inj ?_)))
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, unop_op, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsLimit.fac, Fan.op, unop_comp,
Category.assoc, op_comp, op_unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop]
erw [← Category.assoc, proj_comp_opProductIsoCoproduct'_hom, IsColimit.fac]
rfl
theorem opProductIsoCoproduct_inv_comp_lift {X : C} (π : (a : α) → X ⟶ Z a) :
(opProductIsoCoproduct Z).inv ≫ (Pi.lift π).op = Sigma.desc (fun a ↦ (π a).op) := by
convert opProductIsoCoproduct'_inv_comp_lift (productIsProduct Z)
(coproductIsCoproduct (op <| Z ·)) (Fan.mk _ π)
· ext; simp [Pi.lift, productIsProduct]
· ext; simp [Sigma.desc, coproductIsCoproduct]
end OppositeProducts
instance hasEqualizers_opposite [HasCoequalizers C] : HasEqualizers Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingParallelPairOpEquiv
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_equalizers_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasEqualizers_opposite
instance hasCoequalizers_opposite [HasEqualizers C] : HasCoequalizers Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingParallelPairOpEquiv
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_coequalizers_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoequalizers_opposite
instance hasFiniteColimits_opposite [HasFiniteLimits C] : HasFiniteColimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_colimits_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteColimits_opposite
instance hasFiniteLimits_opposite [HasFiniteColimits C] : HasFiniteLimits Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_limits_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteLimits_opposite
instance hasPullbacks_opposite [HasPushouts C] : HasPullbacks Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasColimitsOfShape WalkingCospanᵒᵖ C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingCospanOpEquiv.symm
apply hasLimitsOfShape_op_of_hasColimitsOfShape
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullbacks_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullbacks_opposite
instance hasPushouts_opposite [HasPullbacks C] : HasPushouts Cᵒᵖ := by
haveI : HasLimitsOfShape WalkingSpanᵒᵖ C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence walkingSpanOpEquiv.symm
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushouts_opposite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushouts_opposite
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `Span f.op g.op` and `(Cospan f g).op` -/
@[simps!]
def spanOp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
span f.op g.op ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> rfl)
(by rintro (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) f <;> cases f <;> aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.span_op CategoryTheory.Limits.spanOp
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `(Cospan f g).op` and `Span f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def opCospan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).op ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ span f.op g.op :=
calc
(cospan f g).op ≅ 𝟭 _ ⋙ (cospan f g).op := by rfl
_ ≅ (walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse) ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
(isoWhiskerRight walkingCospanOpEquiv.unitIso _)
_ ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingCospanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (cospan f g).op :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _)
_ ≅ walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ span f.op g.op := isoWhiskerLeft _ (spanOp f g).symm
#align category_theory.limits.op_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.opCospan
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `Cospan f.op g.op` and `(Span f g).op` -/
@[simps!]
def cospanOp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
cospan f.op g.op ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (span f g).op :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> rfl)
(by rintro (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) f <;> cases f <;> aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_op CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanOp
/-- The canonical isomorphism relating `(Span f g).op` and `Cospan f.op g.op` -/
@[simps!]
def opSpan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
(span f g).op ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ cospan f.op g.op :=
calc
(span f g).op ≅ 𝟭 _ ⋙ (span f g).op := by rfl
_ ≅ (walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse) ⋙ (span f g).op :=
(isoWhiskerRight walkingSpanOpEquiv.unitIso _)
_ ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse ⋙ (span f g).op :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _)
_ ≅ walkingSpanOpEquiv.functor ⋙ cospan f.op g.op := isoWhiskerLeft _ (cospanOp f g).symm
#align category_theory.limits.op_span CategoryTheory.Limits.opSpan
namespace PushoutCocone
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PushoutCocone f g → PullbackCone f.unop g.unop` -/
@[simps!]
def unop {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
PullbackCone f.unop g.unop :=
Cocone.unop
((Cocones.precompose (opCospan f.unop g.unop).hom).obj
(Cocone.whisker walkingCospanOpEquiv.functor c))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_fst {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.unop.fst = c.inl.unop := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem unop_snd {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.unop.snd = c.inr.unop := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.unop_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.unop_snd
-- Porting note: it was originally @[simps (config := lemmasOnly)]
/-- The obvious map `PushoutCocone f.op g.op → PullbackCone f g` -/
@[simps!]
def op {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) : PullbackCone f.op g.op :=
(Cones.postcompose (cospanOp f g).symm.hom).obj
(Cone.whisker walkingSpanOpEquiv.inverse (Cocone.op c))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
theorem op_fst {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.op.fst = c.inl.op := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.op_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.op_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): removed simp attribute as the equality can already be obtained by simp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Opposites.lean | 647 | 648 | theorem op_snd {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} (c : PushoutCocone f g) :
c.op.snd = c.inr.op := by | aesop_cat
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Antoine Chambert-Loir and María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández, Eric Wieser, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Basic
/-!
# Partial HasAntidiagonal for functions with finite support
For an `AddCommMonoid` `μ`,
`Finset.HasAntidiagonal μ` provides a function `antidiagonal : μ → Finset (μ × μ)`
which maps `n : μ` to a `Finset` of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a + b = n`.
In this file, we provide an analogous definition for `ι →₀ μ`,
with an explicit finiteness condition on the support,
assuming `AddCommMonoid μ`, `HasAntidiagonal μ`,
For computability reasons, we also need `DecidableEq ι` and `DecidableEq μ`.
This Finset could be viewed inside `ι → μ`,
but the `Finsupp` condition provides a natural `DecidableEq` instance.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.finsuppAntidiag s n` is the finite set of all functions `f : ι →₀ μ`
with finite support contained in `s` and such that the sum of its values equals `n : μ`
That condition is expressed by `Finset.mem_finsuppAntidiag`
* `Finset.mem_finsuppAntidiag'` rewrites the `Finsupp.sum` condition as a `Finset.sum`.
* `Finset.finAntidiagonal`, a more general case of `Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple`
(TODO: deduplicate).
-/
namespace Finset
variable {ι μ μ' : Type*}
open Function Finsupp
section Fin
variable [AddCommMonoid μ] [DecidableEq μ] [HasAntidiagonal μ]
/-- `finAntidiagonal d n` is the type of `d`-tuples with sum `n`.
TODO: deduplicate with the less general `Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple`. -/
def finAntidiagonal (d : ℕ) (n : μ) : Finset (Fin d → μ) :=
aux d n
where
/-- Auxiliary construction for `finAntidiagonal` that bundles a proof of lawfulness
(`mem_finAntidiagonal`), as this is needed to invoke `disjiUnion`. Using `Finset.disjiUnion` makes
this computationally much more efficient than using `Finset.biUnion`. -/
aux (d : ℕ) (n : μ) : {s : Finset (Fin d → μ) // ∀ f, f ∈ s ↔ ∑ i, f i = n} :=
match d with
| 0 =>
if h : n = 0 then
⟨{0}, by simp [h, Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim ![]]⟩
else
⟨∅, by simp [Ne.symm h]⟩
| d + 1 =>
{ val := (antidiagonal n).disjiUnion
(fun ab => (aux d ab.2).1.map {
toFun := Fin.cons (ab.1)
inj' := Fin.cons_right_injective _ })
(fun i _hi j _hj hij => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun t hti htj => hij <| by
simp_rw [Finset.mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk] at hti htj
obtain ⟨ai, hai, hij'⟩ := hti
obtain ⟨aj, haj, rfl⟩ := htj
rw [Fin.cons_eq_cons] at hij'
ext
· exact hij'.1
· obtain ⟨-, rfl⟩ := hij'
rw [← (aux d i.2).prop ai |>.mp hai, ← (aux d j.2).prop ai |>.mp haj])
property := fun f => by
simp_rw [mem_disjiUnion, mem_antidiagonal, mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Prod.exists,
(aux d _).prop, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, rfl, g, rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ]
· intro hf
exact ⟨_, _, hf, _, rfl, Fin.cons_self_tail f⟩ }
lemma mem_finAntidiagonal (d : ℕ) (n : μ) (f : Fin d → μ) :
f ∈ finAntidiagonal d n ↔ ∑ i, f i = n :=
(finAntidiagonal.aux d n).prop f
/-- `finAntidiagonal₀ d n` is the type of d-tuples with sum `n` -/
def finAntidiagonal₀ (d : ℕ) (n : μ) : Finset (Fin d →₀ μ) :=
(finAntidiagonal d n).map
{ toFun := fun f =>
-- this is `Finsupp.onFinset`, but computable
{ toFun := f, support := univ.filter (f · ≠ 0), mem_support_toFun := fun x => by simp }
inj' := fun _ _ h => DFunLike.coe_fn_eq.mpr h }
lemma mem_finAntidiagonal₀' (d : ℕ) (n : μ) (f : Fin d →₀ μ) :
f ∈ finAntidiagonal₀ d n ↔ ∑ i, f i = n := by
simp only [finAntidiagonal₀, mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk, ← mem_finAntidiagonal,
← DFunLike.coe_injective.eq_iff, Finsupp.coe_mk, exists_eq_right]
lemma mem_finAntidiagonal₀ (d : ℕ) (n : μ) (f : Fin d →₀ μ) :
f ∈ finAntidiagonal₀ d n ↔ sum f (fun _ x => x) = n := by
rw [mem_finAntidiagonal₀', sum_of_support_subset f (subset_univ _) _ (fun _ _ => rfl)]
end Fin
section finsuppAntidiag
variable [DecidableEq ι]
variable [AddCommMonoid μ] [HasAntidiagonal μ] [DecidableEq μ]
/-- The Finset of functions `ι →₀ μ` with support contained in `s` and sum `n`. -/
def finsuppAntidiag (s : Finset ι) (n : μ) : Finset (ι →₀ μ) :=
let x : Finset (s →₀ μ) :=
-- any ordering of elements of `s` will do, the result is the same
(Fintype.truncEquivFinOfCardEq <| Fintype.card_coe s).lift
(fun e => (finAntidiagonal₀ s.card n).map (equivCongrLeft e.symm).toEmbedding)
(fun e1 e2 => Finset.ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_map_equiv, equivCongrLeft_symm, Equiv.symm_symm, equivCongrLeft_apply,
mem_finAntidiagonal₀, sum_equivMapDomain])
x.map
⟨Finsupp.extendDomain, Function.LeftInverse.injective subtypeDomain_extendDomain⟩
/-- A function belongs to `finsuppAntidiag s n`
iff its support is contained in `s` and the sum of its components is equal to `n` -/
lemma mem_finsuppAntidiag {s : Finset ι} {n : μ} {f : ι →₀ μ} :
f ∈ finsuppAntidiag s n ↔ f.support ⊆ s ∧ Finsupp.sum f (fun _ x => x) = n := by
simp only [finsuppAntidiag, mem_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk, mem_finAntidiagonal₀]
induction' (Fintype.truncEquivFinOfCardEq <| Fintype.card_coe s) using Trunc.ind with e'
simp_rw [Trunc.lift_mk, mem_map_equiv, equivCongrLeft_symm, Equiv.symm_symm, equivCongrLeft_apply,
mem_finAntidiagonal₀, sum_equivMapDomain]
constructor
· rintro ⟨f, rfl, rfl⟩
dsimp [sum]
constructor
· exact Finset.coe_subset.mpr (support_extendDomain_subset _)
· simp
· rintro ⟨hsupp, rfl⟩
refine (Function.RightInverse.surjective subtypeDomain_extendDomain).exists.mpr ⟨f, ?_⟩
constructor
· simp_rw [sum, support_subtypeDomain, subtypeDomain_apply, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hsupp]
· rw [extendDomain_subtypeDomain _ hsupp]
end finsuppAntidiag
section
variable [DecidableEq ι]
variable [AddCommMonoid μ] [HasAntidiagonal μ] [DecidableEq μ]
variable [AddCommMonoid μ'] [HasAntidiagonal μ'] [DecidableEq μ']
lemma mem_finsuppAntidiag' (s : Finset ι) (n : μ) (f) :
f ∈ finsuppAntidiag s n ↔ f.support ⊆ s ∧ s.sum f = n := by
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hs
rw [sum_of_support_subset _ hs]
exact fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem finsuppAntidiag_empty_zero :
finsuppAntidiag (∅ : Finset ι) (0 : μ) = {0} := by
ext f
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag]
simp only [mem_singleton, subset_empty]
rw [support_eq_empty, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
intro hf
rw [hf, sum_zero_index]
theorem finsuppAntidiag_empty_of_ne_zero {n : μ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
finsuppAntidiag (∅ : Finset ι) n = ∅ := by
ext f
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag]
simp only [subset_empty, support_eq_empty, sum_empty,
not_mem_empty, iff_false, not_and]
intro hf
rw [hf, sum_zero_index]
exact Ne.symm hn
theorem finsuppAntidiag_empty [DecidableEq μ] (n : μ) :
finsuppAntidiag (∅ : Finset ι) n = if n = 0 then {0} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hn
· rw [hn]
apply finsuppAntidiag_empty_zero
· apply finsuppAntidiag_empty_of_ne_zero hn
theorem mem_finsuppAntidiag_insert [DecidableEq ι] {a : ι} {s : Finset ι}
(h : a ∉ s) (n : μ) {f : ι →₀ μ} :
f ∈ finsuppAntidiag (insert a s) n ↔
∃ m ∈ antidiagonal n, ∃ (g : ι →₀ μ),
f = Finsupp.update g a m.1 ∧ g ∈ finsuppAntidiag s m.2 := by
simp only [mem_finsuppAntidiag', mem_antidiagonal, Prod.exists, sum_insert h]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hsupp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, Finsupp.erase a f, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [update_erase_eq_update, update_self]
· rwa [support_erase, ← subset_insert_iff]
· apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [Finsupp.erase_ne (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h)]
· rintro ⟨n1, n2, rfl, g, rfl, hgsupp, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact (support_update_subset _ _).trans (insert_subset_insert a hgsupp)
· simp only [coe_update]
apply congr_arg₂
· rw [update_same]
· apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [update_noteq (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h) n1 ⇑g]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/PiAntidiagonal.lean | 211 | 229 | theorem finsuppAntidiag_insert [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq μ] {a : ι} {s : Finset ι}
(h : a ∉ s) (n : μ) :
finsuppAntidiag (insert a s) n = (antidiagonal n).biUnion
(fun p : μ × μ =>
(finsuppAntidiag s p.snd).attach.map
⟨fun f => Finsupp.update f.val a p.fst,
(fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ hfg => Subtype.ext <| by
simp only [mem_val, mem_finsuppAntidiag] at hf hg
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff] at hfg ⊢
intro x
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x a
· replace hf := mt (hf.1 ·) h
replace hg := mt (hg.1 ·) h
rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp hf, not_mem_support_iff.mp hg]
· simpa only [coe_update, Function.update, dif_neg hx] using hfg x)⟩) := by |
ext f
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag_insert h, mem_biUnion]
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists, Embedding.coeFn_mk, exists_prop, and_comm,
eq_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Markus Himmel, Bhavik Mehta, Andrew Yang, Emily Riehl
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.WidePullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7316286ff2942aa14e540add9058c6b0aa1c8070"
/-!
# Pullbacks
We define a category `WalkingCospan` (resp. `WalkingSpan`), which is the index category
for the given data for a pullback (resp. pushout) diagram. Convenience methods `cospan f g`
and `span f g` construct functors from the walking (co)span, hitting the given morphisms.
We define `pullback f g` and `pushout f g` as limits and colimits of such functors.
## References
* [Stacks: Fibre products](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001U)
* [Stacks: Pushouts](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0025)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
universe w v₁ v₂ v u u₂
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy, no local
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a pullback, defined as a special case of
`WidePullbackShape`. -/
abbrev WalkingCospan : Type :=
WidePullbackShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
/-- The left point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.left : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.left
/-- The right point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.right : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.right
/-- The central point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.one : WalkingCospan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.one CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.one
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a pushout, defined as a special case of
`WidePushoutShape`.
-/
abbrev WalkingSpan : Type :=
WidePushoutShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan
/-- The left point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.left : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.left
/-- The right point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.right : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.right
/-- The central point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.zero : WalkingSpan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.zero CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.zero
namespace WalkingCospan
/-- The type of arrows for the diagram indexing a pullback. -/
abbrev Hom : WalkingCospan → WalkingCospan → Type :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom
/-- The left arrow of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.inl : left ⟶ one :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.term _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
/-- The right arrow of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.inr : right ⟶ one :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.term _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.inr
/-- The identity arrows of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.id (X : WalkingCospan) : X ⟶ X :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.id X
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.id CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.id
instance (X Y : WalkingCospan) : Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y) := by
constructor; intros; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end WalkingCospan
namespace WalkingSpan
/-- The type of arrows for the diagram indexing a pushout. -/
abbrev Hom : WalkingSpan → WalkingSpan → Type :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom
/-- The left arrow of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.fst : zero ⟶ left :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.init _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
/-- The right arrow of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.snd : zero ⟶ right :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.init _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.snd
/-- The identity arrows of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.id (X : WalkingSpan) : X ⟶ X :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.id X
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.id CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.id
instance (X Y : WalkingSpan) : Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y) := by
constructor; intros a b; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end WalkingSpan
open WalkingSpan.Hom WalkingCospan.Hom WidePullbackShape.Hom WidePushoutShape.Hom
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- To construct an isomorphism of cones over the walking cospan,
it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cone points and check it commutes with the legs to `left` and `right`. -/
def WalkingCospan.ext {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} {s t : Cone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.left = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.right = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₁
have h₂ := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₂
simp_rw [h₂, ← Category.assoc, ← w₁, ← h₁]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.ext
/-- To construct an isomorphism of cocones over the walking span,
it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cocone points and check it commutes with the legs from `left` and `right`. -/
def WalkingSpan.ext {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} {s t : Cocone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.left ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.right ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cocones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₁
have h₂ := t.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₂
simp_rw [← h₁, Category.assoc, w₁, h₂]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.ext
/-- `cospan f g` is the functor from the walking cospan hitting `f` and `g`. -/
def cospan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : WalkingCospan ⥤ C :=
WidePullbackShape.wideCospan Z (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan
/-- `span f g` is the functor from the walking span hitting `f` and `g`. -/
def span {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : WalkingSpan ⥤ C :=
WidePushoutShape.wideSpan X (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j Y Z) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.span CategoryTheory.Limits.span
@[simp]
theorem cospan_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_left
@[simp]
theorem span_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.left = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_left CategoryTheory.Limits.span_left
@[simp]
theorem cospan_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.right = Y := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_right
@[simp]
theorem span_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.right = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_right CategoryTheory.Limits.span_right
@[simp]
theorem cospan_one {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.one = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_one
@[simp]
theorem span_zero {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.zero = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.span_zero
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inl {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inl = f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inl
@[simp]
theorem span_map_fst {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.fst = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_fst
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inr {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inr = g := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inr
@[simp]
theorem span_map_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.snd = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_snd
theorem cospan_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingCospan) :
(cospan f g).map (WalkingCospan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_id
theorem span_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingSpan) :
(span f g).map (WalkingSpan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_id
/-- Every diagram indexing a pullback is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `cospan` -/
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoCospan (F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C) : F ≅ cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoCospan
/-- Every diagram indexing a pushout is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `span` -/
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoSpan (F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C) : F ≅ span (F.map fst) (F.map snd) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_span CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoSpan
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- A functor applied to a cospan is a cospan. -/
def cospanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
cospan f g ⋙ F ≅ cospan (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.right = Iso.refl _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.one = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_one
end
/-- A functor applied to a span is a span. -/
def spanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
span f g ⋙ F ≅ span (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.right = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.zero = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_zero
end
section
variable {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (iX : X ≅ X') (iY : Y ≅ Y') (iZ : Z ≅ Z')
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Z'} {g' : Y' ⟶ Z'}
/-- Construct an isomorphism of cospans from components. -/
def cospanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
cospan f g ≅ cospan f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iZ, iX, iY])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_left : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.left = iX := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_right : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.right = iY := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.one = iZ := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_one
end
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} {g' : X' ⟶ Z'}
/-- Construct an isomorphism of spans from components. -/
def spanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
span f g ≅ span f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iX, iY, iZ])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.left = iY := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.right = iZ := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_one : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.zero = iX := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_zero
end
end
variable {W X Y Z : C}
/-- A pullback cone is just a cone on the cospan formed by two morphisms `f : X ⟶ Z` and
`g : Y ⟶ Z`. -/
abbrev PullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
Cone (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone
namespace PullbackCone
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
/-- The first projection of a pullback cone. -/
abbrev fst (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ X :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst
/-- The second projection of a pullback cone. -/
abbrev snd (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ Y :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd
@[simp]
theorem π_app_left (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.left = c.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem π_app_right (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.right = c.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem condition_one (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.π.app WalkingCospan.one = t.fst ≫ f := by
have w := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at w; simpa using w
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition_one
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a pullback cone is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : PullbackCone f g) (lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.snd = s.snd)
(uniq : ∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(_ : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, m ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => Option.casesOn j (by
rw [← s.w inl, ← t.w inl, ← Category.assoc]
congr
exact fac_left s)
fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' (fac_left s) (fac_right s)
uniq := uniq }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a pullback cone is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def isLimitAux' (t : PullbackCone f g)
(create :
∀ s : PullbackCone f g,
{ l //
l ≫ t.fst = s.fst ∧
l ≫ t.snd = s.snd ∧ ∀ {m}, m ≫ t.fst = s.fst → m ≫ t.snd = s.snd → m = l }) :
Limits.IsLimit t :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1)
(fun s => (create s).2.2.1) fun s _ w =>
(create s).2.2.2 (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
/-- A pullback cone on `f` and `g` is determined by morphisms `fst : W ⟶ X` and `snd : W ⟶ Y`
such that `fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) : PullbackCone f g where
pt := W
π := { app := fun j => Option.casesOn j (fst ≫ f) fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' fst snd
naturality := by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) j <;> cases j <;> dsimp <;> simp [eq] }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_left {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.left = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_right {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.right = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_one {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.one = fst ≫ f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_fst {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).fst = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem mk_snd {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).snd = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd
@[reassoc]
theorem condition (t : PullbackCone f g) : fst t ≫ f = snd t ≫ g :=
(t.w inl).trans (t.w inr).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition
/-- To check whether a morphism is equalized by the maps of a pullback cone, it suffices to check
it for `fst t` and `snd t` -/
theorem equalizer_ext (t : PullbackCone f g) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt} (h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t)
(h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, k ≫ t.π.app j = l ≫ t.π.app j
| some WalkingPair.left => h₀
| some WalkingPair.right => h₁
| none => by rw [← t.w inl, reassoc_of% h₀]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.equalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.equalizer_ext
theorem IsLimit.hom_ext {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt}
(h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t) (h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : k = l :=
ht.hom_ext <| equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext
theorem mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono f] :
Mono t.snd := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ i⟩
rw [← cancel_mono f, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ g) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono
theorem mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono g] :
Mono t.fst := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht i ?_⟩
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ f) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono
/-- To construct an isomorphism of pullback cones, it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cone points and check it commutes with `fst` and `snd`. -/
def ext {s t : PullbackCone f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w₁ : s.fst = i.hom ≫ t.fst)
(w₂ : s.snd = i.hom ≫ t.snd) : s ≅ t :=
WalkingCospan.ext i w₁ w₂
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ext
-- Porting note: `IsLimit.lift` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
/-- If `t` is a limit pullback cone over `f` and `g` and `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` are such that
`h ≫ f = k ≫ g`, then we get `l : W ⟶ t.pt`, which satisfies `l ≫ fst t = h`
and `l ≫ snd t = k`, see `IsLimit.lift_fst` and `IsLimit.lift_snd`. -/
def IsLimit.lift {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ t.pt :=
ht.lift <| PullbackCone.mk _ _ w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_fst {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ fst t = h := ht.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_snd {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ snd t = k := ht.fac _ _
/-- If `t` is a limit pullback cone over `f` and `g` and `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` are such that
`h ≫ f = k ≫ g`, then we have `l : W ⟶ t.pt` satisfying `l ≫ fst t = h` and `l ≫ snd t = k`.
-/
def IsLimit.lift' {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ t.pt // l ≫ fst t = h ∧ l ≫ snd t = k } :=
⟨IsLimit.lift ht h k w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift'
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `PullbackCone` constructed using
`PullbackCone.mk` is a limit cone.
-/
def IsLimit.mk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g)
(lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (mk fst snd eq) :=
isLimitAux _ lift fac_left fac_right fun s m w =>
uniq s m (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk
section Flip
variable (t : PullbackCone f g)
/-- The pullback cone obtained by flipping `fst` and `snd`. -/
def flip : PullbackCone g f := PullbackCone.mk _ _ t.condition.symm
@[simp] lemma flip_pt : t.flip.pt = t.pt := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_fst : t.flip.fst = t.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_snd : t.flip.snd = t.fst := rfl
/-- Flipping a pullback cone twice gives an isomorphic cone. -/
def flipFlipIso : t.flip.flip ≅ t := PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
variable {t}
/-- The flip of a pullback square is a pullback square. -/
def flipIsLimit (ht : IsLimit t) : IsLimit t.flip :=
IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => ht.lift s.flip) (by simp) (by simp) (fun s m h₁ h₂ => by
apply IsLimit.hom_ext ht
all_goals aesop_cat)
/-- A square is a pullback square if its flip is. -/
def isLimitOfFlip (ht : IsLimit t.flip) : IsLimit t :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (flipIsLimit ht) t.flipFlipIso
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.flip_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
end Flip
/--
The pullback cone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` for the pair `(f, f)` is a limit if `f` is a mono. The converse is
shown in `mono_of_pullback_is_id`.
-/
def isLimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : IsLimit (mk (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) rfl : PullbackCone f f) :=
IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => s.fst) (fun s => Category.comp_id _)
(fun s => by rw [← cancel_mono f, Category.comp_id, s.condition]) fun s m m₁ _ => by
simpa using m₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId
/--
`f` is a mono if the pullback cone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` is a limit for the pair `(f, f)`. The converse is
given in `PullbackCone.is_id_of_mono`.
-/
theorem mono_of_isLimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) (t : IsLimit (mk (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) rfl : PullbackCone f f)) :
Mono f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h eq => by
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' t _ _ eq with ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_of_is_limit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_of_isLimitMkIdId
/-- Suppose `f` and `g` are two morphisms with a common codomain and `s` is a limit cone over the
diagram formed by `f` and `g`. Suppose `f` and `g` both factor through a monomorphism `h` via
`x` and `y`, respectively. Then `s` is also a limit cone over the diagram formed by `x` and
`y`. -/
def isLimitOfFactors (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ Z) [Mono h] (x : X ⟶ W) (y : Y ⟶ W)
(hxh : x ≫ h = f) (hyh : y ≫ h = g) (s : PullbackCone f g) (hs : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show s.fst ≫ x = s.snd ≫ y from
(cancel_mono h).1 <| by simp only [Category.assoc, hxh, hyh, s.condition])) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun t =>
have : fst t ≫ x ≫ h = snd t ≫ y ≫ h := by -- Porting note: reassoc workaround
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc]
apply congrArg (· ≫ h) t.condition
⟨hs.lift (PullbackCone.mk t.fst t.snd <| by rw [← hxh, ← hyh, this]),
⟨hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.right, fun hr hr' => by
apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext hs <;>
simp only [PullbackCone.mk_fst, PullbackCone.mk_snd] at hr hr' ⊢ <;>
simp only [hr, hr'] <;>
symm
exacts [hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.right]⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_of_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfFactors
/-- If `W` is the pullback of `f, g`,
it is also the pullback of `f ≫ i, g ≫ i` for any mono `i`. -/
def isLimitOfCompMono (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) (i : W ⟶ Z) [Mono i] (s : PullbackCone f g)
(H : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show s.fst ≫ f ≫ i = s.snd ≫ g ≫ i by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc, s.condition])) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' H s.fst s.snd
((cancel_mono i).mp (by simpa using s.condition)) with
⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨l, h₁, h₂, ?_⟩
intro m hm₁ hm₂
exact (PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext H (hm₁.trans h₁.symm) (hm₂.trans h₂.symm) : _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_of_comp_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfCompMono
end PullbackCone
/-- A pushout cocone is just a cocone on the span formed by two morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` and
`g : X ⟶ Z`. -/
abbrev PushoutCocone (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :=
Cocone (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone
namespace PushoutCocone
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z}
/-- The first inclusion of a pushout cocone. -/
abbrev inl (t : PushoutCocone f g) : Y ⟶ t.pt :=
t.ι.app WalkingSpan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inl
/-- The second inclusion of a pushout cocone. -/
abbrev inr (t : PushoutCocone f g) : Z ⟶ t.pt :=
t.ι.app WalkingSpan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inr
@[simp]
theorem ι_app_left (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.ι.app WalkingSpan.left = c.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem ι_app_right (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.ι.app WalkingSpan.right = c.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ι_app_right
@[simp]
theorem condition_zero (t : PushoutCocone f g) : t.ι.app WalkingSpan.zero = f ≫ t.inl := by
have w := t.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at w; simpa using w.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.condition_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.condition_zero
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a pushout cocone is a colimit cocone.
It only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isColimitAux (t : PushoutCocone f g) (desc : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq : ∀ (s : PushoutCocone f g) (m : t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(_ : ∀ j : WalkingSpan, t.ι.app j ≫ m = s.ι.app j), m = desc s) : IsColimit t :=
{ desc
fac := fun s j =>
Option.casesOn j (by simp [← s.w fst, ← t.w fst, fac_left s]) fun j' =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j' (fac_left s) (fac_right s)
uniq := uniq }
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitAux
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a pushout cocone is a colimit cocone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def isColimitAux' (t : PushoutCocone f g)
(create :
∀ s : PushoutCocone f g,
{ l //
t.inl ≫ l = s.inl ∧
t.inr ≫ l = s.inr ∧ ∀ {m}, t.inl ≫ m = s.inl → t.inr ≫ m = s.inr → m = l }) :
IsColimit t :=
isColimitAux t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1) (fun s => (create s).2.2.1)
fun s _ w => (create s).2.2.2 (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_aux' CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
/-- A pushout cocone on `f` and `g` is determined by morphisms `inl : Y ⟶ W` and `inr : Z ⟶ W` such
that `f ≫ inl = g ↠ inr`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) : PushoutCocone f g where
pt := W
ι := { app := fun j => Option.casesOn j (f ≫ inl) fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' inl inr
naturality := by
rintro (⟨⟩|⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩|⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> intro f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> aesop }
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_left {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.left = inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_right {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.right = inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_zero {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.zero = f ≫ inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_inl {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).inl = inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_inl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inr {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).inr = inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_inr
@[reassoc]
theorem condition (t : PushoutCocone f g) : f ≫ inl t = g ≫ inr t :=
(t.w fst).trans (t.w snd).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.condition
/-- To check whether a morphism is coequalized by the maps of a pushout cocone, it suffices to check
it for `inl t` and `inr t` -/
theorem coequalizer_ext (t : PushoutCocone f g) {W : C} {k l : t.pt ⟶ W}
(h₀ : inl t ≫ k = inl t ≫ l) (h₁ : inr t ≫ k = inr t ≫ l) :
∀ j : WalkingSpan, t.ι.app j ≫ k = t.ι.app j ≫ l
| some WalkingPair.left => h₀
| some WalkingPair.right => h₁
| none => by rw [← t.w fst, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, h₀]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.coequalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.coequalizer_ext
theorem IsColimit.hom_ext {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} {k l : t.pt ⟶ W}
(h₀ : inl t ≫ k = inl t ≫ l) (h₁ : inr t ≫ k = inr t ≫ l) : k = l :=
ht.hom_ext <| coequalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext
-- Porting note: `IsColimit.desc` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
/-- If `t` is a colimit pushout cocone over `f` and `g` and `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` are
morphisms satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k`, then we have a factorization `l : t.pt ⟶ W` such that
`inl t ≫ l = h` and `inr t ≫ l = k`, see `IsColimit.inl_desc` and `IsColimit.inr_desc`-/
def IsColimit.desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : t.pt ⟶ W :=
ht.desc (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ w)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsColimit.inl_desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : inl t ≫ IsColimit.desc ht h k w = h :=
ht.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsColimit.inr_desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : inr t ≫ IsColimit.desc ht h k w = k :=
ht.fac _ _
/-- If `t` is a colimit pushout cocone over `f` and `g` and `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` are
morphisms satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k`, then we have a factorization `l : t.pt ⟶ W` such that
`inl t ≫ l = h` and `inr t ≫ l = k`. -/
def IsColimit.desc' {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : { l : t.pt ⟶ W // inl t ≫ l = h ∧ inr t ≫ l = k } :=
⟨IsColimit.desc ht h k w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc'
theorem epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) [Epi f] :
Epi t.inr :=
⟨fun {W} h k i => IsColimit.hom_ext ht (by simp [← cancel_epi f, t.condition_assoc, i]) i⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi
theorem epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) [Epi g] :
Epi t.inl :=
⟨fun {W} h k i => IsColimit.hom_ext ht i (by simp [← cancel_epi g, ← t.condition_assoc, i])⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi
/-- To construct an isomorphism of pushout cocones, it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cocone points and check it commutes with `inl` and `inr`. -/
def ext {s t : PushoutCocone f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w₁ : s.inl ≫ i.hom = t.inl)
(w₂ : s.inr ≫ i.hom = t.inr) : s ≅ t :=
WalkingSpan.ext i w₁ w₂
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ext
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `PushoutCocone` constructed using
`PushoutCocone.mk` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def IsColimit.mk {W : C} {inl : Y ⟶ W} {inr : Z ⟶ W} (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr)
(desc : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : PushoutCocone f g) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (mk inl inr eq) :=
isColimitAux _ desc fac_left fac_right fun s m w =>
uniq s m (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.mk
section Flip
variable (t : PushoutCocone f g)
/-- The pushout cocone obtained by flipping `inl` and `inr`. -/
def flip : PushoutCocone g f := PushoutCocone.mk _ _ t.condition.symm
@[simp] lemma flip_pt : t.flip.pt = t.pt := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_inl : t.flip.inl = t.inr := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_inr : t.flip.inr = t.inl := rfl
/-- Flipping a pushout cocone twice gives an isomorphic cocone. -/
def flipFlipIso : t.flip.flip ≅ t := PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
variable {t}
/-- The flip of a pushout square is a pushout square. -/
def flipIsColimit (ht : IsColimit t) : IsColimit t.flip :=
IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => ht.desc s.flip) (by simp) (by simp) (fun s m h₁ h₂ => by
apply IsColimit.hom_ext ht
all_goals aesop_cat)
/-- A square is a pushout square if its flip is. -/
def isColimitOfFlip (ht : IsColimit t.flip) : IsColimit t :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (flipIsColimit ht) t.flipFlipIso
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.flip_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
end Flip
/--
The pushout cocone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` for the pair `(f, f)` is a colimit if `f` is an epi. The converse is
shown in `epi_of_isColimit_mk_id_id`.
-/
def isColimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] : IsColimit (mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : PushoutCocone f f) :=
IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => s.inl) (fun s => Category.id_comp _)
(fun s => by rw [← cancel_epi f, Category.id_comp, s.condition]) fun s m m₁ _ => by
simpa using m₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId
/-- `f` is an epi if the pushout cocone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` is a colimit for the pair `(f, f)`.
The converse is given in `PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId`.
-/
theorem epi_of_isColimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y)
(t : IsColimit (mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : PushoutCocone f f)) : Epi f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h eq => by
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' t _ _ eq with ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_of_is_colimit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_of_isColimitMkIdId
/-- Suppose `f` and `g` are two morphisms with a common domain and `s` is a colimit cocone over the
diagram formed by `f` and `g`. Suppose `f` and `g` both factor through an epimorphism `h` via
`x` and `y`, respectively. Then `s` is also a colimit cocone over the diagram formed by `x` and
`y`. -/
def isColimitOfFactors (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : X ⟶ W) [Epi h] (x : W ⟶ Y) (y : W ⟶ Z)
(hhx : h ≫ x = f) (hhy : h ≫ y = g) (s : PushoutCocone f g) (hs : IsColimit s) :
have reassoc₁ : h ≫ x ≫ inl s = f ≫ inl s := by -- Porting note: working around reassoc
rw [← Category.assoc]; apply congrArg (· ≫ inl s) hhx
have reassoc₂ : h ≫ y ≫ inr s = g ≫ inr s := by
rw [← Category.assoc]; apply congrArg (· ≫ inr s) hhy
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ (show x ≫ s.inl = y ≫ s.inr from
(cancel_epi h).1 <| by rw [reassoc₁, reassoc₂, s.condition])) :=
PushoutCocone.isColimitAux' _ fun t => ⟨hs.desc (PushoutCocone.mk t.inl t.inr <| by
rw [← hhx, ← hhy, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, t.condition]),
⟨hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.right, fun hr hr' => by
apply PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext hs;
· simp only [PushoutCocone.mk_inl, PushoutCocone.mk_inr] at hr hr' ⊢
simp only [hr, hr']
symm
exact hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.left
· simp only [PushoutCocone.mk_inl, PushoutCocone.mk_inr] at hr hr' ⊢
simp only [hr, hr']
symm
exact hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.right⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_of_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFactors
/-- If `W` is the pushout of `f, g`,
it is also the pushout of `h ≫ f, h ≫ g` for any epi `h`. -/
def isColimitOfEpiComp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h] (s : PushoutCocone f g)
(H : IsColimit s) :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk _ _
(show (h ≫ f) ≫ s.inl = (h ≫ g) ≫ s.inr by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, s.condition])) := by
apply PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
intro s
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' H s.inl s.inr
((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using s.condition)) with
⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨l, h₁, h₂, ?_⟩
intro m hm₁ hm₂
exact (PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext H (hm₁.trans h₁.symm) (hm₂.trans h₂.symm) : _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_of_epi_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfEpiComp
end PushoutCocone
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
pullbacks. Given `F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr)`, and a pullback cone on `F.map inl` and `F.map inr`, we
get a cone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at `hasPullbacks_of_hasLimit_cospan`,
which you may find to be an easier way of achieving your goal. -/
@[simps]
def Cone.ofPullbackCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr)) :
Cone F where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).inv
#align category_theory.limits.cone.of_pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.ofPullbackCone
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
pushout. Given `F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`span (F.map fst) (F.map snd)`, and a pushout cocone on `F.map fst` and `F.map snd`,
we get a cocone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at `hasPushouts_of_hasColimit_span`, which
you may find to be an easier way of achieving your goal. -/
@[simps]
def Cocone.ofPushoutCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd)) :
Cocone F where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).hom ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.of_pushout_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.ofPushoutCocone
/-- Given `F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as `cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr)`,
and a cone on `F`, we get a pullback cone on `F.map inl` and `F.map inr`. -/
@[simps]
def PullbackCone.ofCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr) where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).hom
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ofCone
/-- A diagram `WalkingCospan ⥤ C` is isomorphic to some `PullbackCone.mk` after
composing with `diagramIsoCospan`. -/
@[simps!]
def PullbackCone.isoMk {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
(Cones.postcompose (diagramIsoCospan.{v} _).hom).obj t ≅
PullbackCone.mk (t.π.app WalkingCospan.left) (t.π.app WalkingCospan.right)
((t.π.naturality inl).symm.trans (t.π.naturality inr : _)) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isoMk
/-- Given `F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as `span (F.map fst) (F.map snd)`,
and a cocone on `F`, we get a pushout cocone on `F.map fst` and `F.map snd`. -/
@[simps]
def PushoutCocone.ofCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd) where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).inv ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ofCocone
/-- A diagram `WalkingSpan ⥤ C` is isomorphic to some `PushoutCocone.mk` after composing with
`diagramIsoSpan`. -/
@[simps!]
def PushoutCocone.isoMk {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
(Cocones.precompose (diagramIsoSpan.{v} _).inv).obj t ≅
PushoutCocone.mk (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.left) (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.right)
((t.ι.naturality fst).trans (t.ι.naturality snd).symm) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isoMk
/-- `HasPullback f g` represents a particular choice of limiting cone
for the pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Z` and `g : Y ⟶ Z`.
-/
abbrev HasPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
HasLimit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPullback
/-- `HasPushout f g` represents a particular choice of colimiting cocone
for the pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : X ⟶ Z`.
-/
abbrev HasPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasColimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPushout
/-- `pullback f g` computes the pullback of a pair of morphisms with the same target. -/
abbrev pullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :=
limit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback
/-- `pushout f g` computes the pushout of a pair of morphisms with the same source. -/
abbrev pushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :=
colimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout
/-- The first projection of the pullback of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pullback.fst {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ X :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst
/-- The second projection of the pullback of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pullback.snd {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd
/-- The first inclusion into the pushout of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pushout.inl {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Y ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl
/-- The second inclusion into the pushout of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pushout.inr {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Z ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` satisfying `h ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism
`pullback.lift : W ⟶ pullback f g`. -/
abbrev pullback.lift {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ pullback f g :=
limit.lift _ (PullbackCone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k` induces a morphism
`pushout.desc : pushout f g ⟶ W`. -/
abbrev pushout.desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout f g ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (PushoutCocone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.desc
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.fst (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.snd (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inl (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inl_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inr (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inr_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_fst {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.fst = h :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_snd {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.snd = k :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_snd
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inl_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inl ≫ pushout.desc h k w = h :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_desc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inr_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inr ≫ pushout.desc h k w = k :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_desc
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` satisfying `h ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism
`l : W ⟶ pullback f g` such that `l ≫ pullback.fst = h` and `l ≫ pullback.snd = k`. -/
def pullback.lift' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ pullback f g // l ≫ pullback.fst = h ∧ l ≫ pullback.snd = k } :=
⟨pullback.lift h k w, pullback.lift_fst _ _ _, pullback.lift_snd _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift'
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k` induces a morphism
`l : pushout f g ⟶ W` such that `pushout.inl ≫ l = h` and `pushout.inr ≫ l = k`. -/
def pullback.desc' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : { l : pushout f g ⟶ W // pushout.inl ≫ l = h ∧ pushout.inr ≫ l = k } :=
⟨pushout.desc h k w, pushout.inl_desc _ _ _, pushout.inr_desc _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.desc'
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] :
(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) ≫ f = pullback.snd ≫ g :=
PullbackCone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.condition
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] :
f ≫ (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) = g ≫ pushout.inr :=
PushoutCocone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.condition
/-- Given such a diagram, then there is a natural morphism `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z`.
W ⟶ Y
↘ ↘
S ⟶ T
↗ ↗
X ⟶ Z
-/
abbrev pullback.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂] (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ pullback g₁ g₂ :=
pullback.lift (pullback.fst ≫ i₁) (pullback.snd ≫ i₂)
(by simp [← eq₁, ← eq₂, pullback.condition_assoc])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map
/-- The canonical map `X ×ₛ Y ⟶ X ×ₜ Y` given `S ⟶ T`. -/
abbrev pullback.mapDesc {X Y S T : C} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] : pullback f g ⟶ pullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) :=
pullback.map f g (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.id_comp _).symm (Category.id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc
/-- Given such a diagram, then there is a natural morphism `W ⨿ₛ X ⟶ Y ⨿ₜ Z`.
W ⟶ Y
↗ ↗
S ⟶ T
↘ ↘
X ⟶ Z
-/
abbrev pushout.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂] (g₁ : T ⟶ Y)
(g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) : pushout f₁ f₂ ⟶ pushout g₁ g₂ :=
pushout.desc (i₁ ≫ pushout.inl) (i₂ ≫ pushout.inr)
(by
simp only [← Category.assoc, eq₁, eq₂]
simp [pushout.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map
/-- The canonical map `X ⨿ₛ Y ⟶ X ⨿ₜ Y` given `S ⟶ T`. -/
abbrev pushout.mapLift {X Y S T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] : pushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) ⟶ pushout f g :=
pushout.map (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) f g (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.mapLift
/-- Two morphisms into a pullback are equal if their compositions with the pullback morphisms are
equal -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem pullback.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] {W : C}
{k l : W ⟶ pullback f g} (h₀ : k ≫ pullback.fst = l ≫ pullback.fst)
(h₁ : k ≫ pullback.snd = l ≫ pullback.snd) : k = l :=
limit.hom_ext <| PullbackCone.equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.hom_ext
/-- The pullback cone built from the pullback projections is a pullback. -/
def pullbackIsPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) pullback.snd pullback.condition) :=
PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => pullback.lift s.fst s.snd s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsPullback
/-- The pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism -/
instance pullback.fst_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono g] :
Mono (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst_of_mono
/-- The pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism -/
instance pullback.snd_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono f] :
Mono (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd_of_mono
/-- The map `X ×[Z] Y ⟶ X × Y` is mono. -/
instance mono_pullback_to_prod {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasPullback f g] [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
Mono (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.fst) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.snd) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.mono_pullback_to_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.mono_pullback_to_prod
/-- Two morphisms out of a pushout are equal if their compositions with the pushout morphisms are
equal -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem pushout.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] {W : C}
{k l : pushout f g ⟶ W} (h₀ : pushout.inl ≫ k = pushout.inl ≫ l)
(h₁ : pushout.inr ≫ k = pushout.inr ≫ l) : k = l :=
colimit.hom_ext <| PushoutCocone.coequalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.hom_ext
/-- The pushout cocone built from the pushout coprojections is a pushout. -/
def pushoutIsPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f g) pushout.inr pushout.condition) :=
PushoutCocone.IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => pushout.desc s.inl s.inr s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsPushout
/-- The pushout of an epimorphism is an epimorphism -/
instance pushout.inl_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi g] :
Epi (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_of_epi
/-- The pushout of an epimorphism is an epimorphism -/
instance pushout.inr_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi f] :
Epi (pushout.inr : Z ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_of_epi
/-- The map `X ⨿ Y ⟶ X ⨿[Z] Y` is epi. -/
instance epi_coprod_to_pushout {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
[HasPushout f g] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] :
Epi (coprod.desc pushout.inl pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f g) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inl ≫ f) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inr ≫ f) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout
instance pullback.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pullback.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map_isIso
/-- If `f₁ = f₂` and `g₁ = g₂`, we may construct a canonical
isomorphism `pullback f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂` -/
@[simps! hom]
def pullback.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] : pullback f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pullback.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] :
(pullback.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pullback.lift_fst]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_fst_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
· erw [pullback.lift_snd]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_snd_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom_inv
instance pushout.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : T ⟶ Y) (g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pushout.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pushout.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map_isIso
theorem pullback.mapDesc_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (i : T ⟶ S) (i' : S ⟶ S')
[HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] [HasPullback (f ≫ i ≫ i') (g ≫ i ≫ i')]
[HasPullback ((f ≫ i) ≫ i') ((g ≫ i) ≫ i')] :
pullback.mapDesc f g (i ≫ i') = pullback.mapDesc f g i ≫ pullback.mapDesc _ _ i' ≫
(pullback.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc_comp
/-- If `f₁ = f₂` and `g₁ = g₂`, we may construct a canonical
isomorphism `pushout f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂` -/
@[simps! hom]
def pushout.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] : pushout f₁ g₁ ≅ pushout f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pushout.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] :
(pushout.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
· erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom_inv
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean | 1,456 | 1,462 | theorem pushout.mapLift_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) (i' : S' ⟶ S)
[HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] [HasPushout (i' ≫ i ≫ f) (i' ≫ i ≫ g)]
[HasPushout ((i' ≫ i) ≫ f) ((i' ≫ i) ≫ g)] :
pushout.mapLift f g (i' ≫ i) =
(pushout.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom ≫
pushout.mapLift _ _ i' ≫ pushout.mapLift f g i := by |
aesop_cat
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Alex J. Best
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Polynomials of specific degree
Facts about polynomials that have a specific integer degree.
-/
namespace Polynomial
section IsDomain
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
/-- A polynomial of degree 2 or 3 is irreducible iff it doesn't have roots. -/
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_roots_eq_zero_of_degree_le_three {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic)
(hp2 : 2 ≤ p.natDegree) (hp3 : p.natDegree ≤ 3) : Irreducible p ↔ p.roots = 0 := by
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := hp.ne_zero
have hp1 : p ≠ 1 := by rintro rfl; rw [natDegree_one] at hp2; cases hp2
rw [hp.irreducible_iff_lt_natDegree_lt hp1]
simp_rw [show p.natDegree / 2 = 1 from
(Nat.div_le_div_right hp3).antisymm
(by apply Nat.div_le_div_right (c := 2) hp2),
show Finset.Ioc 0 1 = {1} from rfl,
Finset.mem_singleton, Multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_roots hp0, ← dvd_iff_isRoot]
refine ⟨fun h r ↦ h _ (monic_X_sub_C r) (natDegree_X_sub_C r), fun h q hq hq1 ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hq.eq_X_add_C hq1, ← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg]
apply h
end IsDomain
section Field
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- A polynomial of degree 2 or 3 is irreducible iff it doesn't have roots. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/SpecificDegree.lean | 43 | 51 | theorem irreducible_iff_roots_eq_zero_of_degree_le_three
{p : K[X]} (hp2 : 2 ≤ p.natDegree) (hp3 : p.natDegree ≤ 3) : Irreducible p ↔ p.roots = 0 := by |
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [natDegree_zero] at hp2; cases hp2
rw [← irreducible_mul_leadingCoeff_inv,
(monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hp0).irreducible_iff_roots_eq_zero_of_degree_le_three,
mul_comm, roots_C_mul]
· exact inv_ne_zero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr hp0)
· rwa [natDegree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hp0]
· rwa [natDegree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hp0]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Multilinear.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Units
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Completeness
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Mul
#align_import analysis.normed_space.bounded_linear_maps from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ce11c3c2a285bbe6937e26d9792fda4e51f3fe1a"
/-!
# Bounded linear maps
This file defines a class stating that a map between normed vector spaces is (bi)linear and
continuous.
Instead of asking for continuity, the definition takes the equivalent condition (because the space
is normed) that `‖f x‖` is bounded by a multiple of `‖x‖`. Hence the "bounded" in the name refers to
`‖f x‖/‖x‖` rather than `‖f x‖` itself.
## Main definitions
* `IsBoundedLinearMap`: Class stating that a map `f : E → F` is linear and has `‖f x‖` bounded
by a multiple of `‖x‖`.
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap`: Class stating that a map `f : E × F → G` is bilinear and continuous,
but through the simpler to provide statement that `‖f (x, y)‖` is bounded by a multiple of
`‖x‖ * ‖y‖`
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap.linearDeriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a linear map.
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap.deriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a continuous linear
map. The proof that it is indeed the derivative is `IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` in
`Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv`.
## Main theorems
* `IsBoundedBilinearMap.continuous`: A bounded bilinear map is continuous.
* `ContinuousLinearEquiv.isOpen`: The continuous linear equivalences are an open subset of the
set of continuous linear maps between a pair of Banach spaces. Placed in this file because its
proof uses `IsBoundedBilinearMap.continuous`.
## Notes
The main use of this file is `IsBoundedBilinearMap`.
The file `Analysis.NormedSpace.Multilinear.Basic`
already expounds the theory of multilinear maps,
but the `2`-variables case is sufficiently simpler to currently deserve its own treatment.
`IsBoundedLinearMap` is effectively an unbundled version of `ContinuousLinearMap` (defined
in `Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic`, theory over normed spaces developed in
`Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm`), albeit the name disparity. A bundled
`ContinuousLinearMap` is to be preferred over an `IsBoundedLinearMap` hypothesis. Historical
artifact, really.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology
open Filter (Tendsto)
open Metric ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
/-- A function `f` satisfies `IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f` if it is linear and satisfies the
inequality `‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖` for some positive constant `M`. -/
structure IsBoundedLinearMap (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] (f : E → F) extends
IsLinearMap 𝕜 f : Prop where
bound : ∃ M, 0 < M ∧ ∀ x : E, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖
#align is_bounded_linear_map IsBoundedLinearMap
theorem IsLinearMap.with_bound {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) (M : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x : E, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f :=
⟨hf,
by_cases
(fun (this : M ≤ 0) =>
⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun x =>
(h x).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (this.trans zero_le_one) (norm_nonneg x)⟩)
fun (this : ¬M ≤ 0) => ⟨M, lt_of_not_ge this, h⟩⟩
#align is_linear_map.with_bound IsLinearMap.with_bound
/-- A continuous linear map satisfies `IsBoundedLinearMap` -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.isBoundedLinearMap (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f :=
{ f.toLinearMap.isLinear with bound := f.bound }
#align continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map ContinuousLinearMap.isBoundedLinearMap
namespace IsBoundedLinearMap
/-- Construct a linear map from a function `f` satisfying `IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f`. -/
def toLinearMap (f : E → F) (h : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : E →ₗ[𝕜] F :=
IsLinearMap.mk' _ h.toIsLinearMap
#align is_bounded_linear_map.to_linear_map IsBoundedLinearMap.toLinearMap
/-- Construct a continuous linear map from `IsBoundedLinearMap`. -/
def toContinuousLinearMap {f : E → F} (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
{ toLinearMap f hf with
cont :=
let ⟨C, _, hC⟩ := hf.bound
AddMonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound (toLinearMap f hf) C hC }
#align is_bounded_linear_map.to_continuous_linear_map IsBoundedLinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap
theorem zero : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
(0 : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).isLinear.with_bound 0 <| by simp [le_refl]
#align is_bounded_linear_map.zero IsBoundedLinearMap.zero
theorem id : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun x : E => x :=
LinearMap.id.isLinear.with_bound 1 <| by simp [le_refl]
#align is_bounded_linear_map.id IsBoundedLinearMap.id
theorem fst : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun x : E × F => x.1 := by
refine (LinearMap.fst 𝕜 E F).isLinear.with_bound 1 fun x => ?_
rw [one_mul]
exact le_max_left _ _
#align is_bounded_linear_map.fst IsBoundedLinearMap.fst
theorem snd : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun x : E × F => x.2 := by
refine (LinearMap.snd 𝕜 E F).isLinear.with_bound 1 fun x => ?_
rw [one_mul]
exact le_max_right _ _
#align is_bounded_linear_map.snd IsBoundedLinearMap.snd
variable {f g : E → F}
theorem smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (c • f) :=
let ⟨hlf, M, _, hM⟩ := hf
(c • hlf.mk' f).isLinear.with_bound (‖c‖ * M) fun x =>
calc
‖c • f x‖ = ‖c‖ * ‖f x‖ := norm_smul c (f x)
_ ≤ ‖c‖ * (M * ‖x‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hM _) (norm_nonneg _)
_ = ‖c‖ * M * ‖x‖ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align is_bounded_linear_map.smul IsBoundedLinearMap.smul
theorem neg (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun e => -f e := by
rw [show (fun e => -f e) = fun e => (-1 : 𝕜) • f e by funext; simp]
exact smul (-1) hf
#align is_bounded_linear_map.neg IsBoundedLinearMap.neg
theorem add (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) (hg : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 g) :
IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun e => f e + g e :=
let ⟨hlf, Mf, _, hMf⟩ := hf
let ⟨hlg, Mg, _, hMg⟩ := hg
(hlf.mk' _ + hlg.mk' _).isLinear.with_bound (Mf + Mg) fun x =>
calc
‖f x + g x‖ ≤ Mf * ‖x‖ + Mg * ‖x‖ := norm_add_le_of_le (hMf x) (hMg x)
_ ≤ (Mf + Mg) * ‖x‖ := by rw [add_mul]
#align is_bounded_linear_map.add IsBoundedLinearMap.add
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/BoundedLinearMaps.lean | 155 | 156 | theorem sub (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) (hg : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 g) :
IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 fun e => f e - g e := by | simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using add hf (neg hg)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.fractional_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ed90a7d327c3a5caf65a6faf7e8a0d63c4605df7"
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P] [loc : IsLocalization S P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P'] [loc' : IsLocalization S P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P''] [loc'' : IsLocalization S P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, g.map_smul, hb']⟩
#align is_fractional.map IsFractional.map
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map FractionalIdeal.map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_map FractionalIdeal.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
#align fractional_ideal.mem_map FractionalIdeal.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
#align fractional_ideal.map_id FractionalIdeal.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
#align fractional_ideal.map_comp FractionalIdeal.map_comp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.map_coeIdeal
@[simp]
theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
#align fractional_ideal.map_one FractionalIdeal.map_one
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
#align fractional_ideal.map_zero FractionalIdeal.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
#align fractional_ideal.map_add FractionalIdeal.map_add
@[simp]
theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
#align fractional_ideal.map_mul FractionalIdeal.map_mul
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_map_symm FractionalIdeal.map_map_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_symm_map FractionalIdeal.map_symm_map
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_mem_map FractionalIdeal.map_mem_map
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
#align fractional_ideal.map_injective FractionalIdeal.map_injective
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_fun_map_equiv FractionalIdeal.coeFun_mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_apply FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_symm FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_refl FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_refl
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb =>
span_induction hb h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_span_iff FractionalIdeal.isFractional_span_iff
theorem isFractional_of_fg {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) : IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_of_fg FractionalIdeal.isFractional_of_fg
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul FractionalIdeal.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul
variable (S)
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_fg FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_fg
variable {S}
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
#align fractional_ideal.fg_unit FractionalIdeal.fg_unit
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
#align fractional_ideal.fg_of_is_unit FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit I h
#align ideal.fg_of_is_unit Ideal.fg_of_isUnit
variable (S P P')
/-- `canonicalEquiv f f'` is the canonical equivalence between the fractional
ideals in `P` and in `P'`, which are both localizations of `R` at `S`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def canonicalEquiv : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' :=
mapEquiv
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv P P' (RingEquiv.refl R)
(show S.map _ = S by rw [RingEquiv.toMonoidHom_refl, Submonoid.map_id]) with
commutes' := fun r => ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ _ }
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mem_canonicalEquiv_apply {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P'} :
x ∈ canonicalEquiv S P P' I ↔
∃ y ∈ I,
IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R) (fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy)
(y : P) =
x := by
rw [canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_apply, mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mem_canonical_equiv_apply FractionalIdeal.mem_canonicalEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_symm : (canonicalEquiv S P P').symm = canonicalEquiv S P' P :=
RingEquiv.ext fun I =>
SetLike.ext_iff.mpr fun x => by
rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply, canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_symm, mapEquiv_apply,
mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_symm FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_symm
theorem canonicalEquiv_flip (I) : canonicalEquiv S P P' (canonicalEquiv S P' P I) = I := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_symm]; erw [RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_flip FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_flip
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
canonicalEquiv S P' P'' (canonicalEquiv S P P' I) = canonicalEquiv S P P'' I := by
ext
simp only [IsLocalization.map_map, RingHomInvPair.comp_eq₂, mem_canonicalEquiv_apply,
exists_prop, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv
theorem canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] :
(canonicalEquiv S P P').trans (canonicalEquiv S P' P'') = canonicalEquiv S P P'' :=
RingEquiv.ext (canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv S P P' P'')
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_trans_canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : canonicalEquiv S P P' I = I := by
ext
simp [IsLocalization.map_eq]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_self : canonicalEquiv S P P = RingEquiv.refl _ := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv S P P]
convert (canonicalEquiv S P P).symm_trans_self
exact (canonicalEquiv_symm S P P).symm
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_self FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_self
end
section IsFractionRing
/-!
### `IsFractionRing` section
This section concerns fractional ideals in the field of fractions,
i.e. the type `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` where `IsFractionRing R K`.
-/
variable {K K' : Type*} [Field K] [Field K']
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra R K'] [IsFractionRing R K']
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (h : K →ₐ[R] K')
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals contain a nonzero integer. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∃ x, x ≠ 0 ∧ algebraMap R K x ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨y : K, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hI)
have y_ne_zero : y ≠ 0 := by simpa using y_not_mem
obtain ⟨z, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_integer_multiple R⁰ y
refine ⟨x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Ne, ← @IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff R _ K, hx, Algebra.smul_def]
exact mul_ne_zero (IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors z.2) y_ne_zero
· rw [hx]
exact smul_mem _ _ y_mem
#align fractional_ideal.exists_ne_zero_mem_is_integer FractionalIdeal.exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger
theorem map_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) : I.map h ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, x_ne_zero, hx⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
contrapose! x_ne_zero with map_eq_zero
refine IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (eq_zero_iff.mp map_eq_zero _ (mem_map.mpr ?_))
exact ⟨algebraMap R K x, hx, h.commutes x⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.map_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] : I.map h = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨not_imp_not.mp (map_ne_zero _), fun hI => hI.symm ▸ map_zero h⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_eq_zero_iff FractionalIdeal.map_eq_zero_iff
theorem coeIdeal_injective : Function.Injective (fun (I : Ideal R) ↦ (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) :=
coeIdeal_injective' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_injective FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_injective
theorem coeIdeal_inj {I J : Ideal R} :
(I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ↔ I = J :=
coeIdeal_inj' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_inj FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 ↔ I = ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_eq_zero' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_eq_zero FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_zero
theorem coeIdeal_ne_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 ↔ I ≠ ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 ↔ I = 1 := by
simpa only [Ideal.one_eq_top] using coeIdeal_inj
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_eq_one FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one
theorem coeIdeal_ne_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coeIdeal_eq_one
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_one FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_one
theorem num_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} : I.num = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_num_eq_bot zero_not_mem_nonZeroDivisors h,
fun h ↦ h ▸ num_zero_eq (IsFractionRing.injective R K)⟩
end IsFractionRing
section Quotient
/-!
### `quotient` section
This section defines the ideal quotient of fractional ideals.
In this section we need that each non-zero `y : R` has an inverse in
the localization, i.e. that the localization is a field. We satisfy this
assumption by taking `S = nonZeroDivisors R`, `R`'s localization at which
is a field because `R` is a domain.
-/
open scoped Classical
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [frac : IsFractionRing R₁ K]
instance : Nontrivial (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
have this : (1 : K) ∈ (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := by
rw [← (algebraMap R₁ K).map_one]
simpa only [h] using coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1
one_ne_zero ((mem_zero_iff _).mp this)⟩⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : I ≠ 0 := fun hI =>
zero_ne_one' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
(by
convert h
simp [hI])
#align fractional_ideal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one FractionalIdeal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one
variable [IsDomain R₁]
theorem _root_.IsFractional.div_of_nonzero {I J : Submodule R₁ K} :
IsFractional R₁⁰ I → IsFractional R₁⁰ J → J ≠ 0 → IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J)
| ⟨aI, haI, hI⟩, ⟨aJ, haJ, hJ⟩, h => by
obtain ⟨y, mem_J, not_mem_zero⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (show 0 < J by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h)
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hJ y mem_J
use aI * y'
constructor
· apply (nonZeroDivisors R₁).mul_mem haI (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr _)
intro y'_eq_zero
have : algebraMap R₁ K aJ * y = 0 := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← hy', y'_eq_zero, RingHom.map_zero]
have y_zero :=
(mul_eq_zero.mp this).resolve_left
(mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R₁ K)).1 (IsFractionRing.injective _ _) _)
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp haJ))
apply not_mem_zero
simpa
intro b hb
convert hI _ (hb _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ aJ mem_J)) using 1
rw [← hy', mul_comm b, ← Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul]
#align is_fractional.div_of_nonzero IsFractional.div_of_nonzero
theorem fractional_div_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
I.isFractional.div_of_nonzero J.isFractional fun H =>
h <| coeToSubmodule_injective <| H.trans coe_zero.symm
#align fractional_ideal.fractional_div_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.fractional_div_of_nonzero
noncomputable instance : Div (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨fun I J => if h : J = 0 then 0 else ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩⟩
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
@[simp]
theorem div_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align fractional_ideal.div_zero FractionalIdeal.div_zero
theorem div_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
I / J = ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align fractional_ideal.div_nonzero FractionalIdeal.div_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem coe_div {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
(↑(I / J) : Submodule R₁ K) = ↑I / (↑J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_neg hJ)
#align fractional_ideal.coe_div FractionalIdeal.coe_div
theorem mem_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) {x} :
x ∈ I / J ↔ ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I := by
rw [div_nonzero h]
exact Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem
#align fractional_ideal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero
theorem mul_one_div_le_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, div_zero, mul_zero]
exact zero_le 1
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI, coe_one]
apply Submodule.mul_one_div_le_one
#align fractional_ideal.mul_one_div_le_one FractionalIdeal.mul_one_div_le_one
theorem le_self_mul_one_div {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * (1 / I) := by
by_cases hI_nz : I = 0
· rw [hI_nz, div_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI_nz, coe_one]
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one] at hI
exact Submodule.le_self_mul_one_div hI
#align fractional_ideal.le_self_mul_one_div FractionalIdeal.le_self_mul_one_div
theorem le_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ J', x * y ∈ J :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mp (h hx), fun h x hx =>
(mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mpr (h x hx)⟩
#align fractional_ideal.le_div_iff_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.le_div_iff_of_nonzero
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ I * J' ≤ J := by
rw [div_nonzero hJ']
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [← coe_le_coe (I := I * J') (J := J), coe_mul]
exact Submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le
#align fractional_ideal.le_div_iff_mul_le FractionalIdeal.le_div_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem div_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 1 = I := by
rw [div_nonzero (one_ne_zero' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K))]
ext
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mp h 1 ((algebraMap R₁ K).map_one ▸ coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1)
· apply mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mpr
rintro y ⟨y', _, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [mul_comm, Algebra.linearMap_apply, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ y' h
#align fractional_ideal.div_one FractionalIdeal.div_one
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) :
J = 1 / I := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hx hy
#align fractional_ideal.eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right FractionalIdeal.eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right
theorem mul_div_self_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨1 / I, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right I J hJ]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mul_div_self_cancel_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_div_self_cancel_iff
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
theorem map_div (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(I / J).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = I.map h / J.map h := by
by_cases H : J = 0
· rw [H, div_zero, map_zero, div_zero]
· -- Porting note: `simp` wouldn't apply these lemmas so do them manually using `rw`
rw [← coeToSubmodule_inj, div_nonzero H, div_nonzero (map_ne_zero _ H)]
simp [Submodule.map_div]
#align fractional_ideal.map_div FractionalIdeal.map_div
-- Porting note: doesn't need to be @[simp] because this follows from `map_one` and `map_div`
theorem map_one_div (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(1 / I).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = 1 / I.map h := by rw [map_div, map_one]
#align fractional_ideal.map_one_div FractionalIdeal.map_one_div
end Quotient
section Field
variable {R₁ K L : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [Algebra K L] [IsFractionRing K L]
theorem eq_zero_or_one (I : FractionalIdeal K⁰ L) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hI
simp_rw [@SetLike.ext_iff _ _ _ I 1, mem_one_iff]
intro x
constructor
· intro x_mem
obtain ⟨n, d, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective K⁰ x
refine ⟨n / d, ?_⟩
rw [map_div₀, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div]
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, y_ne, y_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
rw [← div_mul_cancel₀ x y_ne, RingHom.map_mul, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact smul_mem (M := L) I (x / y) y_mem
#align fractional_ideal.eq_zero_or_one FractionalIdeal.eq_zero_or_one
theorem eq_zero_or_one_of_isField (hF : IsField R₁) (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 :=
letI : Field R₁ := hF.toField
eq_zero_or_one I
#align fractional_ideal.eq_zero_or_one_of_is_field FractionalIdeal.eq_zero_or_one_of_isField
end Field
section PrincipalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
open scoped Classical
variable (R₁)
/-- `FractionalIdeal.span_finset R₁ s f` is the fractional ideal of `R₁` generated by `f '' s`. -/
-- Porting note: `@[simps]` generated a `Subtype.val` coercion instead of a
-- `FractionalIdeal.coeToSubmodule` coercion
def spanFinset {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K :=
⟨Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s), by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples R₁⁰ s f
refine ⟨a', a'.2, fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction hx ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ha' i hi
· rw [smul_zero]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_zero
· intro x y hx hy
rw [smul_add]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_add hx hy
· intro c x hx
rw [smul_comm]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_smul hx⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset FractionalIdeal.spanFinset
@[simp] lemma spanFinset_coe {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) :
(spanFinset R₁ s f : Submodule R₁ K) = Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s) :=
rfl
variable {R₁}
@[simp]
theorem spanFinset_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f = 0 ↔ ∀ j ∈ s, f j = 0 := by
simp only [← coeToSubmodule_inj, spanFinset_coe, coe_zero, Submodule.span_eq_bot,
Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset_eq_zero FractionalIdeal.spanFinset_eq_zero
theorem spanFinset_ne_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ j ∈ s, f j ≠ 0 := by simp
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.spanFinset_ne_zero
open Submodule.IsPrincipal
theorem isFractional_span_singleton (x : P) : IsFractional S (span R {x} : Submodule R P) :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_integer_multiple S x
isFractional_span_iff.mpr ⟨a, a.2, fun _ hx' => (Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hx').symm ▸ ha⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.isFractional_span_singleton
variable (S)
/-- `spanSingleton x` is the fractional ideal generated by `x` if `0 ∉ S` -/
irreducible_def spanSingleton (x : P) : FractionalIdeal S P :=
⟨span R {x}, isFractional_span_singleton x⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton
-- local attribute [semireducible] span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem coe_spanSingleton (x : P) : (spanSingleton S x : Submodule R P) = span R {x} := by
rw [spanSingleton]
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.coe_spanSingleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_spanSingleton {x y : P} : x ∈ spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : R, z • y = x := by
rw [spanSingleton]
exact Submodule.mem_span_singleton
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.mem_spanSingleton
theorem mem_spanSingleton_self (x : P) : x ∈ spanSingleton S x :=
(mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_singleton_self FractionalIdeal.mem_spanSingleton_self
variable (P) in
/-- A version of `FractionalIdeal.den_mul_self_eq_num` in terms of fractional ideals. -/
theorem den_mul_self_eq_num' (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P I.den) * I = I.num := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
dsimp only
rw [coe_mul, ← smul_eq_mul, coe_spanSingleton, smul_eq_mul, Submodule.span_singleton_mul]
convert I.den_mul_self_eq_num using 1
ext
erw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_smul_set]
simp [Algebra.smul_def]
variable {S}
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_le_iff_mem {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
spanSingleton S x ≤ I ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_spanSingleton, Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, mem_coe]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_le_iff_mem
theorem spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton [NoZeroSMulDivisors R P] {x y : P} :
spanSingleton S x = spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : Rˣ, z • x = y := by
rw [← Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, spanSingleton, spanSingleton]
exact Subtype.mk_eq_mk
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton
theorem eq_spanSingleton_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal S P) [IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P)] :
I = spanSingleton S (generator (I : Submodule R P)) := by
-- Porting note: this used to be `coeToSubmodule_injective (span_singleton_generator ↑I).symm`
-- but Lean 4 struggled to unify everything. Turned it into an explicit `rw`.
rw [spanSingleton, ← coeToSubmodule_inj, coe_mk, span_singleton_generator]
#align fractional_ideal.eq_span_singleton_of_principal FractionalIdeal.eq_spanSingleton_of_principal
theorem isPrincipal_iff (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P) ↔ ∃ x, I = spanSingleton S x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨@generator _ _ _ _ _ (↑I) h, @eq_spanSingleton_of_principal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I h⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => { principal' := ⟨x, Eq.trans (congr_arg _ hx) (coe_spanSingleton _ x)⟩ }⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_principal_iff FractionalIdeal.isPrincipal_iff
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_zero : spanSingleton S (0 : P) = 0 := by
ext
simp [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_zero FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_zero
theorem spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y = 0 ↔ y = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
span_eq_bot.mp (by simpa using congr_arg Subtype.val h : span R {y} = ⊥) y (mem_singleton y),
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_eq_zero_iff FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff
theorem spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y ≠ 0 ↔ y ≠ 0 :=
not_congr spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_ne_zero_iff FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_one : spanSingleton S (1 : P) = 1 := by
ext
refine (mem_spanSingleton S).trans ((exists_congr ?_).trans (mem_one_iff S).symm)
intro x'
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_one FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_one
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton (x y : P) :
spanSingleton S x * spanSingleton S y = spanSingleton S (x * y) := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, coe_spanSingleton, span_mul_span, singleton_mul_singleton]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 715 | 718 | theorem spanSingleton_pow (x : P) (n : ℕ) : spanSingleton S x ^ n = spanSingleton S (x ^ n) := by |
induction' n with n hn
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, spanSingleton_one]
· rw [pow_succ, hn, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, pow_succ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
import Mathlib.Topology.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41bef4ae1254365bc190aee63b947674d2977f01"
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## TODO
This file is huge; move material into separate files,
such as `Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Lemmas.lean`.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
#align has_norm Norm
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
#align has_nnnorm NNNorm
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_group SeminormedGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_group NormedAddGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_group NormedGroup
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_comm_group SeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_comm_group SeminormedCommGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_comm_group NormedCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
#align normed_group.to_seminormed_group NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align normed_add_group.to_seminormed_add_group NormedAddGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
#align seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_normed_group NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_group NormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
def NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| by exact (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- Porting note: the `rwa` no longer worked, but it was easy enough to provide the term.
-- however, notice that if you make `x` and `y` accessible, then the following does work:
-- `have := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq x y; rwa [← this]`, so I'm not sure why the `rwa`
-- was broken.
#align normed_group.of_separation NormedGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_group.of_separation NormedAddGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
#align normed_comm_group.of_separation NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_separation NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist NormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist' NormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq x y := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
-- Porting note: how did `mathlib3` solve this automatically?
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_comm_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
#align group_norm.to_normed_group GroupNorm.toNormedGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_norm.to_normed_comm_group GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
instance PUnit.normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup PUnit where
norm := Function.const _ 0
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem PUnit.norm_eq_zero (r : PUnit) : ‖r‖ = 0 :=
rfl
#align punit.norm_eq_zero PUnit.norm_eq_zero
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
#align dist_eq_norm_div dist_eq_norm_div
#align dist_eq_norm_sub dist_eq_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align dist_eq_norm_div' dist_eq_norm_div'
#align dist_eq_norm_sub' dist_eq_norm_sub'
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
#align dist_eq_norm dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
#align dist_eq_norm' dist_eq_norm'
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right : IsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_right NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_right NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
#align dist_one_right dist_one_right
#align dist_zero_right dist_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext fun a => by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
#align dist_one_left dist_one_left
#align dist_zero_left dist_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_one Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero Isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) comap_norm_atTop]
theorem comap_norm_atTop' : comap norm atTop = cobounded E := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using comap_dist_right_atTop (1 : E)
@[to_additive Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm]
lemma Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set ℝ}
(h : HasBasis atTop p s) : HasBasis (cobounded E) p fun i ↦ norm ⁻¹' s i :=
comap_norm_atTop' (E := E) ▸ h.comap _
@[to_additive Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm]
lemma Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm' : HasBasis (cobounded E) (fun _ ↦ True) ({x | · ≤ ‖x‖}) :=
atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded' {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (‖f ·‖) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded E) := by
rw [← comap_norm_atTop', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop' : Tendsto norm (cobounded E) atTop :=
tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded'.2 tendsto_id
@[to_additive eventually_cobounded_le_norm]
lemma eventually_cobounded_le_norm' (a : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ x in cobounded E, a ≤ ‖x‖ :=
tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'.eventually_ge_atTop a
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop' [ProperSpace E] : Tendsto norm (cocompact E) atTop :=
cobounded_eq_cocompact (α := E) ▸ tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
#align norm_div_rev norm_div_rev
#align norm_sub_rev norm_sub_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
#align norm_inv' norm_inv'
#align norm_neg norm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
#align dist_mul_self_right dist_mul_self_right
#align dist_add_self_right dist_add_self_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
#align dist_mul_self_left dist_mul_self_left
#align dist_add_self_left dist_add_self_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Filter.inv_cobounded : (cobounded E)⁻¹ = cobounded E := by
simp only [← comap_norm_atTop', ← Filter.comap_inv, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), norm_inv']
/-- In a (semi)normed group, inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to infinity at infinity. -/
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity."]
theorem Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded : Tendsto Inv.inv (cobounded E) (cobounded E) :=
inv_cobounded.le
#align filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded
#align filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded Filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
#align norm_mul_le' norm_mul_le'
#align norm_add_le norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align norm_mul_le_of_le norm_mul_le_of_le
#align norm_add_le_of_le norm_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le]
theorem norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
#align norm_mul₃_le norm_mul₃_le
#align norm_add₃_le norm_add₃_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
#align norm_nonneg' norm_nonneg'
#align norm_nonneg norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
#align abs_norm abs_norm
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are nonnegative, via
`norm_nonneg'`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg' $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: additive norms are nonnegative, via `norm_nonneg`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalAddNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedAddGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
#align norm_one' norm_one'
#align norm_zero norm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
#align ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
#align norm_of_subsingleton' norm_of_subsingleton'
#align norm_of_subsingleton norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq'
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
#align norm_div_le norm_div_le
#align norm_sub_le norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
#align norm_div_le_of_le norm_div_le_of_le
#align norm_sub_le_of_le norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm' dist_le_norm_add_norm'
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm dist_le_norm_add_norm
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le' abs_norm_sub_norm_le'
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le abs_norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
#align norm_sub_norm_le' norm_sub_norm_le'
#align norm_sub_norm_le norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
#align dist_norm_norm_le' dist_norm_norm_le'
#align dist_norm_norm_le dist_norm_norm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' norm_le_norm_add_norm_div'
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub' norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div norm_le_norm_add_norm_div
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
#align norm_le_insert' norm_le_insert'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
#align norm_le_insert norm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
#align norm_le_mul_norm_add norm_le_mul_norm_add
#align norm_le_add_norm_add norm_le_add_norm_add
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align ball_eq' ball_eq'
#align ball_eq ball_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
#align ball_one_eq ball_one_eq
#align ball_zero_eq ball_zero_eq
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm'' mem_ball_iff_norm''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm mem_ball_iff_norm
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm''' mem_ball_iff_norm'''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm' mem_ball_iff_norm'
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
#align mem_ball_one_iff mem_ball_one_iff
#align mem_ball_zero_iff mem_ball_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'' mem_closedBall_iff_norm''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm mem_closedBall_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
#align mem_closed_ball_one_iff mem_closedBall_one_iff
#align mem_closed_ball_zero_iff mem_closedBall_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm''' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball' norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball norm_le_of_mem_closedBall
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball' norm_lt_of_mem_ball'
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball norm_lt_of_mem_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right'] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
#align norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div
#align norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub
@[to_additive isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le]
theorem isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le' : Bornology.IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [Set.subset_def, mem_closedBall_one_iff] using isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (1 : E)
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le', _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le, _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le
attribute [to_additive existing exists_norm_le] Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive exists_pos_norm_le]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R :=
let ⟨R₀, hR₀⟩ := hs.exists_norm_le'
⟨max R₀ 1, by positivity, fun x hx => (hR₀ x hx).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le
@[to_additive Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ < R :=
let ⟨R, hR₀, hR⟩ := hs.exists_pos_norm_le'
⟨R + 1, by positivity, fun x hx ↦ (hR x hx).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm' mem_sphere_iff_norm'
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm mem_sphere_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_one_iff_norm mem_sphere_one_iff_norm
#align mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' norm_eq_of_mem_sphere'
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere norm_eq_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
#align ne_one_of_mem_sphere ne_one_of_mem_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
#align ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
#align norm_group_seminorm normGroupSeminorm
#align norm_add_group_seminorm normAddGroupSeminorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_norm_group_seminorm coe_normGroupSeminorm
#align coe_norm_add_group_seminorm coe_normAddGroupSeminorm
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_zero NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {u : α → E} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → ‖u m / u n‖ < ε := by
simp [Metric.cauchySeq_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
#align normed_add_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedAddCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
#align normed_add_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedAddCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
#align monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
theorem MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : Continuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
#align monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : UniformContinuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniformContinuous
#align monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
@[to_additive IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn]
theorem IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn' [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
{f : α → E} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
(isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.1 (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isBounded).imp fun _C hC _x hx =>
hC _ <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on' IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn'
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem HasCompactMulSupport.exists_bound_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace α]
{f : α → E} (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) (h'f : Continuous f) : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa using (hf.isCompact_range h'f).isBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ← map_div]
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x y => h _⟩
simpa using h x 1
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align add_monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
alias ⟨_, MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm⟩ := MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
attribute [to_additive] MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
#align seminormed_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm
#align seminormed_add_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ :=
rfl
#align coe_nnnorm' coe_nnnorm'
#align coe_nnnorm coe_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_comp_nnnorm' coe_comp_nnnorm'
#align coe_comp_nnnorm coe_comp_nnnorm
@[to_additive norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
#align norm_to_nnreal' norm_toNNReal'
#align norm_to_nnreal norm_toNNReal
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_div nndist_eq_nnnorm_div
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm nndist_eq_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 :=
NNReal.eq norm_one'
#align nnnorm_one' nnnorm_one'
#align nnnorm_zero nnnorm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
#align ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
#align nnnorm_mul_le' nnnorm_mul_le'
#align nnnorm_add_le nnnorm_add_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
#align nnnorm_inv' nnnorm_inv'
#align nnnorm_neg nnnorm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
#align nnnorm_div_le nnnorm_div_le
#align nnnorm_sub_le nnnorm_sub_le
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le'
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div'
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
#align nnnorm_le_insert' nnnorm_le_insert'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
#align nnnorm_le_insert nnnorm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
#align nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add
#align nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : ENNReal.ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖₊ :=
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm']
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' (x : E) : edist x 1 = (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div, div_one]
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' edist_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm edist_eq_coe_nnnorm
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball (1 : E) r ↔ ↑‖a‖₊ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm']
#align mem_emetric_ball_one_iff mem_emetric_ball_one_iff
#align mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : LipschitzWith C f :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe C ▸ MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
#align monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm
#align add_monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
#align monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖ ≤ K * ‖x‖ := by simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.dist_le_mul x 1
#align lipschitz_with.norm_le_mul' LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul'
#align lipschitz_with.norm_le_mul LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖x‖₊ :=
h.norm_le_mul' hf x
#align lipschitz_with.nnorm_le_mul' LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul'
#align lipschitz_with.nnorm_le_mul LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := by
simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_norm' AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm'
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_norm AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖f x‖₊ :=
h.le_mul_norm' hf x
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_nnnorm' AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm'
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_nnnorm AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz [OneHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
h.le_mul_nnnorm' (map_one f) x
#align one_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz
#align zero_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz ZeroHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.nnnorm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| hi.norm_map_of_map_one h₁ x
end NNNorm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero {f : α → E} {a : Filter α} {b : E} :
Tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto (fun e => ‖f e / b‖) a (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [← dist_eq_norm_div, ← tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero]
#align tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_one tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero
#align tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : α → E} {a : Filter α} :
Tendsto f a (𝓝 1) ↔ Tendsto (‖f ·‖) a (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero.trans <| by simp only [div_one]
#align tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_one tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero
#align tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_norm_nhds_one : comap norm (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 (1 : E) := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using nhds_comap_dist (1 : E)
#align comap_norm_nhds_one comap_norm_nhds_one
#align comap_norm_nhds_zero comap_norm_nhds_zero
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1` (neutral element of `SeminormedGroup`).
In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_one_norm'` and `squeeze_one_norm`), following a convention of
similar lemmas in `Topology.MetricSpace.Basic` and `Topology.Algebra.Order`, the `'` version is
phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`. In this pair of lemmas
(`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of similar lemmas in
`Topology.MetricSpace.PseudoMetric` and `Topology.Algebra.Order`, the `'` version is phrased using
\"eventually\" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely."]
theorem squeeze_one_norm' {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n)
(h' : Tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 <|
squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall fun _n => norm_nonneg' _) h h'
#align squeeze_one_norm' squeeze_one_norm'
#align squeeze_zero_norm' squeeze_zero_norm'
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `a` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`."]
theorem squeeze_one_norm {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (h : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n) :
Tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0) → Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
squeeze_one_norm' <| eventually_of_forall h
#align squeeze_one_norm squeeze_one_norm
#align squeeze_zero_norm squeeze_zero_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_norm_div_self (x : E) : Tendsto (fun a => ‖a / x‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using
tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _a => (x : E)) (𝓝 x) _)
#align tendsto_norm_div_self tendsto_norm_div_self
#align tendsto_norm_sub_self tendsto_norm_sub_self
@[to_additive tendsto_norm]
theorem tendsto_norm' {x : E} : Tendsto (fun a => ‖a‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ‖x‖) := by
simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _a => (1 : E)) _ _)
#align tendsto_norm' tendsto_norm'
#align tendsto_norm tendsto_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_norm_one : Tendsto (fun a : E => ‖a‖) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using tendsto_norm_div_self (1 : E)
#align tendsto_norm_one tendsto_norm_one
#align tendsto_norm_zero tendsto_norm_zero
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_norm]
theorem continuous_norm' : Continuous fun a : E => ‖a‖ := by
simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : Continuous fun _a => (1 : E))
#align continuous_norm' continuous_norm'
#align continuous_norm continuous_norm
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_nnnorm]
theorem continuous_nnnorm' : Continuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
continuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
#align continuous_nnnorm' continuous_nnnorm'
#align continuous_nnnorm continuous_nnnorm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_norm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_norm' : LipschitzWith 1 (norm : E → ℝ) := by
simpa only [dist_one_left] using LipschitzWith.dist_right (1 : E)
#align lipschitz_with_one_norm' lipschitzWith_one_norm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_norm lipschitzWith_one_norm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm' : LipschitzWith 1 (NNNorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm' lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_norm]
theorem uniformContinuous_norm' : UniformContinuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'.uniformContinuous
#align uniform_continuous_norm' uniformContinuous_norm'
#align uniform_continuous_norm uniformContinuous_norm
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_nnnorm]
theorem uniformContinuous_nnnorm' : UniformContinuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
uniformContinuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
#align uniform_continuous_nnnorm' uniformContinuous_nnnorm'
#align uniform_continuous_nnnorm uniformContinuous_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_one_iff_norm {x : E} : x ∈ closure ({1} : Set E) ↔ ‖x‖ = 0 := by
rw [← closedBall_zero', mem_closedBall_one_iff, (norm_nonneg' x).le_iff_eq]
#align mem_closure_one_iff_norm mem_closure_one_iff_norm
#align mem_closure_zero_iff_norm mem_closure_zero_iff_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_one_eq : closure ({1} : Set E) = { x | ‖x‖ = 0 } :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_closure_one_iff_norm
#align closure_one_eq closure_one_eq
#align closure_zero_eq closure_zero_eq
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead of
multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead
of multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le' {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∃ A, ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : Tendsto (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) := by
cases' h_op with A h_op
rcases hg with ⟨C, hC⟩; rw [eventually_map] at hC
rw [NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one] at hf ⊢
intro ε ε₀
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε₀ (A * C) with ⟨δ, δ₀, hδ⟩
filter_upwards [hf δ δ₀, hC] with i hf hg
refine (h_op _ _).trans_lt ?_
rcases le_total A 0 with hA | hA
· exact (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hA <| norm_nonneg' _) <|
norm_nonneg' _).trans_lt ε₀
calc
A * ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖ ≤ A * δ * C := by gcongr; exact hg
_ = A * C * δ := mul_right_comm _ _ _
_ < ε := hδ
#align filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le' Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le'
#align filter.tendsto.op_zero_is_bounded_under_le' Filter.Tendsto.op_zero_isBoundedUnder_le'
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so that it
can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so
that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : Tendsto (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) :=
hf.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le' hg op ⟨1, fun x y => (one_mul ‖x‖).symm ▸ h_op x y⟩
#align filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le
#align filter.tendsto.op_zero_is_bounded_under_le Filter.Tendsto.op_zero_isBoundedUnder_le
section
variable {l : Filter α} {f : α → E}
@[to_additive Filter.Tendsto.norm]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.norm' (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l (𝓝 ‖a‖) :=
tendsto_norm'.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.norm' Filter.Tendsto.norm'
#align filter.tendsto.norm Filter.Tendsto.norm
@[to_additive Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm' (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) l (𝓝 ‖a‖₊) :=
Tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm'.continuousAt h
#align filter.tendsto.nnnorm' Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm'
#align filter.tendsto.nnnorm Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → E}
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) Continuous.norm]
theorem Continuous.norm' : Continuous f → Continuous fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm'.comp
#align continuous.norm' Continuous.norm'
#align continuous.norm Continuous.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) Continuous.nnnorm]
theorem Continuous.nnnorm' : Continuous f → Continuous fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm'.comp
#align continuous.nnnorm' Continuous.nnnorm'
#align continuous.nnnorm Continuous.nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousAt.norm]
theorem ContinuousAt.norm' {a : α} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) a :=
Tendsto.norm' h
#align continuous_at.norm' ContinuousAt.norm'
#align continuous_at.norm ContinuousAt.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousAt.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousAt.nnnorm' {a : α} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) a :=
Tendsto.nnnorm' h
#align continuous_at.nnnorm' ContinuousAt.nnnorm'
#align continuous_at.nnnorm ContinuousAt.nnnorm
@[to_additive ContinuousWithinAt.norm]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.norm' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) s a :=
Tendsto.norm' h
#align continuous_within_at.norm' ContinuousWithinAt.norm'
#align continuous_within_at.norm ContinuousWithinAt.norm
@[to_additive ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) s a :=
Tendsto.nnnorm' h
#align continuous_within_at.nnnorm' ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm'
#align continuous_within_at.nnnorm ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousOn.norm]
theorem ContinuousOn.norm' {s : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).norm'
#align continuous_on.norm' ContinuousOn.norm'
#align continuous_on.norm ContinuousOn.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousOn.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousOn.nnnorm' {s : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) s := fun x hx => (h x hx).nnnorm'
#align continuous_on.nnnorm' ContinuousOn.nnnorm'
#align continuous_on.nnnorm ContinuousOn.nnnorm
end
/-- If `‖y‖ → ∞`, then we can assume `y ≠ x` for any fixed `x`. -/
@[to_additive eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop "If `‖y‖→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any
fixed `x`"]
theorem eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop' {l : Filter α} {f : α → E}
(h : Tendsto (fun y => ‖f y‖) l atTop) (x : E) : ∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
(h.eventually_ne_atTop _).mono fun _x => ne_of_apply_ne norm
#align eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top' eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop'
#align eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedCommGroup.mem_closure_iff :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ b ∈ s, ‖a / b‖ < ε := by
simp [Metric.mem_closure_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align seminormed_comm_group.mem_closure_iff SeminormedCommGroup.mem_closure_iff
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.mem_closure_iff SeminormedAddCommGroup.mem_closure_iff
@[to_additive norm_le_zero_iff']
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,407 | 1,410 | theorem norm_le_zero_iff''' [T0Space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := by |
letI : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedGroup E› with toMetricSpace := MetricSpace.ofT0PseudoMetricSpace E }
rw [← dist_one_right, dist_le_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
#align_import topology.algebra.order.monotone_convergence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
/-!
# Bounded monotone sequences converge
In this file we prove a few theorems of the form “if the range of a monotone function `f : ι → α`
admits a least upper bound `a`, then `f x` tends to `a` as `x → ∞`”, as well as version of this
statement for (conditionally) complete lattices that use `⨆ x, f x` instead of `IsLUB`.
These theorems work for linear orders with order topologies as well as their products (both in terms
of `Prod` and in terms of function types). In order to reduce code duplication, we introduce two
typeclasses (one for the property formulated above and one for the dual property), prove theorems
assuming one of these typeclasses, and provide instances for linear orders and their products.
We also prove some "inverse" results: if `f n` is a monotone sequence and `a` is its limit,
then `f n ≤ a` for all `n`.
## Tags
monotone convergence
-/
open Filter Set Function
open scoped Classical
open Filter Topology
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- We say that `α` is a `SupConvergenceClass` if the following holds. Let `f : ι → α` be a
monotone function, let `a : α` be a least upper bound of `Set.range f`. Then `f x` tends to `𝓝 a`
as `x → ∞` (formally, at the filter `Filter.atTop`). We require this for `ι = (s : Set α)`,
`f = CoeTC.coe` in the definition, then prove it for any `f` in `tendsto_atTop_isLUB`.
This property holds for linear orders with order topology as well as their products. -/
class SupConvergenceClass (α : Type*) [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- proof that a monotone function tends to `𝓝 a` as `x → ∞` -/
tendsto_coe_atTop_isLUB :
∀ (a : α) (s : Set α), IsLUB s a → Tendsto (CoeTC.coe : s → α) atTop (𝓝 a)
#align Sup_convergence_class SupConvergenceClass
/-- We say that `α` is an `InfConvergenceClass` if the following holds. Let `f : ι → α` be a
monotone function, let `a : α` be a greatest lower bound of `Set.range f`. Then `f x` tends to `𝓝 a`
as `x → -∞` (formally, at the filter `Filter.atBot`). We require this for `ι = (s : Set α)`,
`f = CoeTC.coe` in the definition, then prove it for any `f` in `tendsto_atBot_isGLB`.
This property holds for linear orders with order topology as well as their products. -/
class InfConvergenceClass (α : Type*) [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- proof that a monotone function tends to `𝓝 a` as `x → -∞`-/
tendsto_coe_atBot_isGLB :
∀ (a : α) (s : Set α), IsGLB s a → Tendsto (CoeTC.coe : s → α) atBot (𝓝 a)
#align Inf_convergence_class InfConvergenceClass
instance OrderDual.supConvergenceClass [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [InfConvergenceClass α] :
SupConvergenceClass αᵒᵈ :=
⟨‹InfConvergenceClass α›.1⟩
#align order_dual.Sup_convergence_class OrderDual.supConvergenceClass
instance OrderDual.infConvergenceClass [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [SupConvergenceClass α] :
InfConvergenceClass αᵒᵈ :=
⟨‹SupConvergenceClass α›.1⟩
#align order_dual.Inf_convergence_class OrderDual.infConvergenceClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrder.supConvergenceClass [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] : SupConvergenceClass α := by
refine ⟨fun a s ha => tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun b hb => ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩⟩
· rcases ha.exists_between hb with ⟨c, hcs, bc, bca⟩
lift c to s using hcs
exact (eventually_ge_atTop c).mono fun x hx => bc.trans_le hx
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x => (ha.1 x.2).trans_lt hb
#align linear_order.Sup_convergence_class LinearOrder.supConvergenceClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrder.infConvergenceClass [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] : InfConvergenceClass α :=
show InfConvergenceClass αᵒᵈᵒᵈ from OrderDual.infConvergenceClass
#align linear_order.Inf_convergence_class LinearOrder.infConvergenceClass
section
variable {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [TopologicalSpace α]
section IsLUB
variable [Preorder α] [SupConvergenceClass α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
theorem tendsto_atTop_isLUB (h_mono : Monotone f) (ha : IsLUB (Set.range f) a) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) := by
suffices Tendsto (rangeFactorization f) atTop atTop from
(SupConvergenceClass.tendsto_coe_atTop_isLUB _ _ ha).comp this
exact h_mono.rangeFactorization.tendsto_atTop_atTop fun b => b.2.imp fun a ha => ha.ge
#align tendsto_at_top_is_lub tendsto_atTop_isLUB
theorem tendsto_atBot_isLUB (h_anti : Antitone f) (ha : IsLUB (Set.range f) a) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 a) := by convert tendsto_atTop_isLUB h_anti.dual_left ha using 1
#align tendsto_at_bot_is_lub tendsto_atBot_isLUB
end IsLUB
section IsGLB
variable [Preorder α] [InfConvergenceClass α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
theorem tendsto_atBot_isGLB (h_mono : Monotone f) (ha : IsGLB (Set.range f) a) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 a) := by convert tendsto_atTop_isLUB h_mono.dual ha.dual using 1
#align tendsto_at_bot_is_glb tendsto_atBot_isGLB
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/MonotoneConvergence.lean | 117 | 118 | theorem tendsto_atTop_isGLB (h_anti : Antitone f) (ha : IsGLB (Set.range f) a) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) := by | convert tendsto_atBot_isLUB h_anti.dual ha.dual using 1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
#align_import analysis.normed.group.hom from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3c4225288b55380a90df078ebae0991080b12393"
/-!
# Normed groups homomorphisms
This file gathers definitions and elementary constructions about bounded group homomorphisms
between normed (abelian) groups (abbreviated to "normed group homs").
The main lemmas relate the boundedness condition to continuity and Lipschitzness.
The main construction is to endow the type of normed group homs between two given normed groups
with a group structure and a norm, giving rise to a normed group structure. We provide several
simple constructions for normed group homs, like kernel, range and equalizer.
Some easy other constructions are related to subgroups of normed groups.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0` we start setting up the
theory of `SeminormedAddGroupHom` and we specialize to `NormedAddGroupHom` when needed.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal
-- TODO: migrate to the new morphism / morphism_class style
/-- A morphism of seminormed abelian groups is a bounded group homomorphism. -/
structure NormedAddGroupHom (V W : Type*) [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] where
/-- The function underlying a `NormedAddGroupHom` -/
toFun : V → W
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is additive. -/
map_add' : ∀ v₁ v₂, toFun (v₁ + v₂) = toFun v₁ + toFun v₂
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is bounded. -/
bound' : ∃ C, ∀ v, ‖toFun v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖
#align normed_add_group_hom NormedAddGroupHom
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup W]
{f g : NormedAddGroupHom V W}
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom'` for a version that uses `ℝ≥0` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀ v, ‖f v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖) : NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, h⟩ }
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom` for a version that uses `ℝ` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ≥0) (hC : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) :
NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, hC⟩ }
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom' AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom'
end AddMonoidHom
theorem exists_pos_bound_of_bound {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] {f : V → W} (M : ℝ) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) :
∃ N, 0 < N ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖ :=
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), fun x =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖ := h x
_ ≤ max M 1 * ‖x‖ := by gcongr; apply le_max_left
⟩
#align exists_pos_bound_of_bound exists_pos_bound_of_bound
namespace NormedAddGroupHom
variable {V V₁ V₂ V₃ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₁]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup V₂] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₃]
variable {f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂}
/-- A Lipschitz continuous additive homomorphism is a normed additive group homomorphism. -/
def ofLipschitz (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂ :=
f.mkNormedAddGroupHom K fun x ↦ by simpa only [map_zero, dist_zero_right] using h.dist_le_mul x 0
instance funLike : FunLike (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' := fun f g h => by cases f; cases g; congr
-- Porting note: moved this declaration up so we could get a `FunLike` instance sooner.
instance toAddMonoidHomClass : AddMonoidHomClass (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := (AddMonoidHom.mk' f.toFun f.map_add').map_zero
initialize_simps_projections NormedAddGroupHom (toFun → apply)
theorem coe_inj (H : (f : V₁ → V₂) = g) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_inj NormedAddGroupHom.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (V₁ → V₂) toFun := by
apply coe_inj
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_injective NormedAddGroupHom.coe_injective
theorem coe_inj_iff : f = g ↔ (f : V₁ → V₂) = g :=
⟨congr_arg _, coe_inj⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_inj_iff NormedAddGroupHom.coe_inj_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_inj <| funext H
#align normed_add_group_hom.ext NormedAddGroupHom.ext
theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨by rintro rfl x; rfl, ext⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.ext_iff NormedAddGroupHom.ext_iff
variable (f g)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_fun_eq_coe NormedAddGroupHom.toFun_eq_coe
-- Porting note: removed `simp` because `simpNF` complains the LHS doesn't simplify.
theorem coe_mk (f) (h₁) (h₂) (h₃) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_mk NormedAddGroupHom.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C hC) = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_mk_normed_add_group_hom NormedAddGroupHom.coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom' C hC) = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_mk_normed_add_group_hom' NormedAddGroupHom.coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom'
/-- The group homomorphism underlying a bounded group homomorphism. -/
def toAddMonoidHom (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : V₁ →+ V₂ :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' f f.map_add'
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_add_monoid_hom NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAddMonoidHom : ⇑f.toAddMonoidHom = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_to_add_monoid_hom NormedAddGroupHom.coe_toAddMonoidHom
theorem toAddMonoidHom_injective :
Function.Injective (@NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom V₁ V₂ _ _) := fun f g h =>
coe_inj <| by rw [← coe_toAddMonoidHom f, ← coe_toAddMonoidHom g, h]
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_add_monoid_hom_injective NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_toAddMonoidHom (f) (h₁) (h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂).toAddMonoidHom = AddMonoidHom.mk' f h₁ :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.mk_to_add_monoid_hom NormedAddGroupHom.mk_toAddMonoidHom
theorem bound : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := f.bound'
exists_pos_bound_of_bound _ hC
#align normed_add_group_hom.bound NormedAddGroupHom.bound
theorem antilipschitz_of_norm_ge {K : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, map_sub] using h (x - y)
#align normed_add_group_hom.antilipschitz_of_norm_ge NormedAddGroupHom.antilipschitz_of_norm_ge
/-- A normed group hom is surjective on the subgroup `K` with constant `C` if every element
`x` of `K` has a preimage whose norm is bounded above by `C*‖x‖`. This is a more
abstract version of `f` having a right inverse defined on `K` with operator norm
at most `C`. -/
def SurjectiveOnWith (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (K : AddSubgroup V₂) (C : ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ h ∈ K, ∃ g, f g = h ∧ ‖g‖ ≤ C * ‖h‖
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.mono {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C C' : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) (H : C ≤ C') : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
intro k k_in
rcases h k k_in with ⟨g, rfl, hg⟩
use g, rfl
by_cases Hg : ‖f g‖ = 0
· simpa [Hg] using hg
· exact hg.trans (by gcongr)
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with.mono NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith.mono
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.exists_pos {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : ∃ C' > 0, f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
refine ⟨|C| + 1, ?_, ?_⟩
· linarith [abs_nonneg C]
· apply h.mono
linarith [le_abs_self C]
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with.exists_pos NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith.exists_pos
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.surjOn {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : Set.SurjOn f Set.univ K := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).imp fun _a ⟨ha, _⟩ => ⟨Set.mem_univ _, ha⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with.surj_on NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith.surjOn
/-! ### The operator norm -/
/-- The operator norm of a seminormed group homomorphism is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def opNorm (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ }
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm
instance hasOpNorm : Norm (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨opNorm⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.has_op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.hasOpNorm
theorem norm_def : ‖f‖ = sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_def NormedAddGroupHom.norm_def
-- So that invocations of `le_csInf` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
theorem bounds_nonempty {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} :
∃ c, c ∈ { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.bounds_nonempty NormedAddGroupHom.bounds_nonempty
theorem bounds_bddBelow {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} :
BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.bounds_bdd_below NormedAddGroupHom.bounds_bddBelow
theorem opNorm_nonneg : 0 ≤ ‖f‖ :=
le_csInf bounds_nonempty fun _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => hx
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_nonneg NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_nonneg
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm: `‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖`. -/
theorem le_opNorm (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := by
obtain ⟨C, _Cpos, hC⟩ := f.bound
replace hC := hC x
by_cases h : ‖x‖ = 0
· rwa [h, mul_zero] at hC ⊢
have hlt : 0 < ‖x‖ := lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg x) (Ne.symm h)
exact
(div_le_iff hlt).mp
(le_csInf bounds_nonempty fun c ⟨_, hc⟩ => (div_le_iff hlt).mpr <| by apply hc)
#align normed_add_group_hom.le_op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.le_opNorm
theorem le_opNorm_of_le {c : ℝ} {x} (h : ‖x‖ ≤ c) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * c :=
le_trans (f.le_opNorm x) (by gcongr; exact f.opNorm_nonneg)
#align normed_add_group_hom.le_op_norm_of_le NormedAddGroupHom.le_opNorm_of_le
theorem le_of_opNorm_le {c : ℝ} (h : ‖f‖ ≤ c) (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ :=
(f.le_opNorm x).trans (by gcongr)
#align normed_add_group_hom.le_of_op_norm_le NormedAddGroupHom.le_of_opNorm_le
/-- continuous linear maps are Lipschitz continuous. -/
theorem lipschitz : LipschitzWith ⟨‖f‖, opNorm_nonneg f⟩ f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun x y => by
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm, ← map_sub]
apply le_opNorm
#align normed_add_group_hom.lipschitz NormedAddGroupHom.lipschitz
protected theorem uniformContinuous (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : UniformContinuous f :=
f.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align normed_add_group_hom.uniform_continuous NormedAddGroupHom.uniformContinuous
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : Continuous f :=
f.uniformContinuous.continuous
#align normed_add_group_hom.continuous NormedAddGroupHom.continuous
theorem ratio_le_opNorm (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ / ‖x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (norm_nonneg _) f.opNorm_nonneg (le_opNorm _ _)
#align normed_add_group_hom.ratio_le_op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.ratio_le_opNorm
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `f`. -/
theorem opNorm_le_bound {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ M :=
csInf_le bounds_bddBelow ⟨hMp, hM⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_le_bound NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_le_bound
theorem opNorm_eq_of_bounds {M : ℝ} (M_nonneg : 0 ≤ M) (h_above : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖)
(h_below : ∀ N ≥ 0, (∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖) → M ≤ N) : ‖f‖ = M :=
le_antisymm (f.opNorm_le_bound M_nonneg h_above)
((le_csInf_iff NormedAddGroupHom.bounds_bddBelow ⟨M, M_nonneg, h_above⟩).mpr
fun N ⟨N_nonneg, hN⟩ => h_below N N_nonneg hN)
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_eq_of_bounds NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_eq_of_bounds
theorem opNorm_le_of_lipschitz {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
‖f‖ ≤ K :=
f.opNorm_le_bound K.2 fun x => by simpa only [dist_zero_right, map_zero] using hf.dist_le_mul x 0
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_le_of_lipschitz NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_le_of_lipschitz
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism via the constructor
`AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor
if it is nonnegative. -/
theorem mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) :
‖f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C h‖ ≤ C :=
opNorm_le_bound _ hC h
#align normed_add_group_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le NormedAddGroupHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism via the constructor
`NormedAddGroupHom.ofLipschitz`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor. -/
theorem ofLipschitz_norm_le (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) :
‖ofLipschitz f h‖ ≤ K :=
mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le f K.coe_nonneg _
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism
via the constructor `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom`, then its norm is bounded by the bound
given to the constructor or zero if this bound is negative. -/
theorem mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le' (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {C : ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) :
‖f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C h‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) fun x =>
(h x).trans <| by gcongr; apply le_max_left
#align normed_add_group_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le' NormedAddGroupHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le'
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le := mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le' := mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le'
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le' AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le'
/-! ### Addition of normed group homs -/
/-- Addition of normed group homs. -/
instance add : Add (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
(f.toAddMonoidHom + g.toAddMonoidHom).mkNormedAddGroupHom (‖f‖ + ‖g‖) fun v =>
calc
‖f v + g v‖ ≤ ‖f v‖ + ‖g v‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖v‖ + ‖g‖ * ‖v‖ := by gcongr <;> apply le_opNorm
_ = (‖f‖ + ‖g‖) * ‖v‖ := by rw [add_mul]
⟩
/-- The operator norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem opNorm_add_le : ‖f + g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ + ‖g‖ :=
mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le _ (add_nonneg (opNorm_nonneg _) (opNorm_nonneg _)) _
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_add_le NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_add_le
-- Porting note: this library note doesn't seem to apply anymore
/-
library_note "addition on function coercions"/--
Terms containing `@has_add.add (has_coe_to_fun.F ...) pi.has_add`
seem to cause leanchecker to [crash due to an out-of-memory
condition](https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/543).
As a workaround, we add a type annotation: `(f + g : V₁ → V₂)`
-/
-/
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_add NormedAddGroupHom.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(f + g) v = f v + g v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.add_apply NormedAddGroupHom.add_apply
/-! ### The zero normed group hom -/
instance zero : Zero (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨(0 : V₁ →+ V₂).mkNormedAddGroupHom 0 (by simp)⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The norm of the `0` operator is `0`. -/
theorem opNorm_zero : ‖(0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂)‖ = 0 :=
le_antisymm
(csInf_le bounds_bddBelow
⟨ge_of_eq rfl, fun _ =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [zero_mul]
exact norm_zero)⟩)
(opNorm_nonneg _)
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_zero NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_zero
/-- For normed groups, an operator is zero iff its norm vanishes. -/
theorem opNorm_zero_iff {V₁ V₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₁] [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
{f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun hn =>
ext fun x =>
norm_le_zero_iff.1
(calc
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ = _ := by rw [hn, zero_mul]
))
fun hf => by rw [hf, opNorm_zero]
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_zero_iff NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = 0 :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_zero NormedAddGroupHom.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (v : V₁) : (0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = 0 :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.zero_apply NormedAddGroupHom.zero_apply
variable {f g}
/-! ### The identity normed group hom -/
variable (V)
/-- The identity as a continuous normed group hom. -/
@[simps!]
def id : NormedAddGroupHom V V :=
(AddMonoidHom.id V).mkNormedAddGroupHom 1 (by simp [le_refl])
#align normed_add_group_hom.id NormedAddGroupHom.id
/-- The norm of the identity is at most `1`. It is in fact `1`, except when the norm of every
element vanishes, where it is `0`. (Since we are working with seminorms this can happen even if the
space is non-trivial.) It means that one can not do better than an inequality in general. -/
theorem norm_id_le : ‖(id V : NormedAddGroupHom V V)‖ ≤ 1 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one fun x => by simp
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_id_le NormedAddGroupHom.norm_id_le
/-- If there is an element with norm different from `0`, then the norm of the identity equals `1`.
(Since we are working with seminorms supposing that the space is non-trivial is not enough.) -/
theorem norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm (h : ∃ x : V, ‖x‖ ≠ 0) : ‖id V‖ = 1 :=
le_antisymm (norm_id_le V) <| by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
have := (id V).ratio_le_opNorm x
rwa [id_apply, div_self hx] at this
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm NormedAddGroupHom.norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm
/-- If a normed space is non-trivial, then the norm of the identity equals `1`. -/
theorem norm_id {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [Nontrivial V] : ‖id V‖ = 1 := by
refine norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm V ?_
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : V)
exact ⟨x, ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_id NormedAddGroupHom.norm_id
theorem coe_id : (NormedAddGroupHom.id V : V → V) = _root_.id :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_id NormedAddGroupHom.coe_id
/-! ### The negation of a normed group hom -/
/-- Opposite of a normed group hom. -/
instance neg : Neg (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f => (-f.toAddMonoidHom).mkNormedAddGroupHom ‖f‖ fun v => by simp [le_opNorm f v]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_neg NormedAddGroupHom.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(-f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = -f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.neg_apply NormedAddGroupHom.neg_apply
theorem opNorm_neg (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
simp only [norm_def, coe_neg, norm_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_neg NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_neg
/-! ### Subtraction of normed group homs -/
/-- Subtraction of normed group homs. -/
instance sub : Sub (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ f.toAddMonoidHom - g.toAddMonoidHom with
bound' := by
simp only [AddMonoidHom.sub_apply, AddMonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact (f + -g).bound' }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_sub NormedAddGroupHom.coe_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(f - g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = f v - g v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.sub_apply NormedAddGroupHom.sub_apply
/-! ### Scalar actions on normed group homs -/
section SMul
variable {R R' : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] [DistribMulAction R V₂] [PseudoMetricSpace R]
[BoundedSMul R V₂] [MonoidWithZero R'] [DistribMulAction R' V₂] [PseudoMetricSpace R']
[BoundedSMul R' V₂]
instance smul : SMul R (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul r f :=
{ toFun := r • ⇑f
map_add' := (r • f.toAddMonoidHom).map_add'
bound' :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := f.bound'
⟨dist r 0 * b, fun x => by
have := dist_smul_pair r (f x) (f 0)
rw [map_zero, smul_zero, dist_zero_right, dist_zero_right] at this
rw [mul_assoc]
refine this.trans ?_
gcongr
exact hb x⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (r : R) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(r • f) = r • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_smul NormedAddGroupHom.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (r : R) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) : (r • f) v = r • f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.smul_apply NormedAddGroupHom.smul_apply
instance smulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' V₂] :
SMulCommClass R R' (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul_comm _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_comm _ _ _
instance isScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' V₂] :
IsScalarTower R R' (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul_assoc _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_assoc _ _ _
instance isCentralScalar [DistribMulAction Rᵐᵒᵖ V₂] [IsCentralScalar R V₂] :
IsCentralScalar R (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
op_smul_eq_smul _ _ := ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _
end SMul
instance nsmul : SMul ℕ (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul n f :=
{ toFun := n • ⇑f
map_add' := (n • f.toAddMonoidHom).map_add'
bound' :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := f.bound'
⟨n • b, fun v => by
rw [Pi.smul_apply, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
exact (norm_nsmul_le _ _).trans (by gcongr; apply hb)⟩ }
#align normed_add_group_hom.has_nat_scalar NormedAddGroupHom.nsmul
@[simp]
theorem coe_nsmul (r : ℕ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(r • f) = r • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_nsmul NormedAddGroupHom.coe_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_apply (r : ℕ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) : (r • f) v = r • f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.nsmul_apply NormedAddGroupHom.nsmul_apply
instance zsmul : SMul ℤ (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul z f :=
{ toFun := z • ⇑f
map_add' := (z • f.toAddMonoidHom).map_add'
bound' :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := f.bound'
⟨‖z‖ • b, fun v => by
rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
exact (norm_zsmul_le _ _).trans (by gcongr; apply hb)⟩ }
#align normed_add_group_hom.has_int_scalar NormedAddGroupHom.zsmul
@[simp]
theorem coe_zsmul (r : ℤ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(r • f) = r • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_zsmul NormedAddGroupHom.coe_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_apply (r : ℤ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) : (r • f) v = r • f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.zsmul_apply NormedAddGroupHom.zsmul_apply
/-! ### Normed group structure on normed group homs -/
/-- Homs between two given normed groups form a commutative additive group. -/
instance toAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
coe_injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Normed group homomorphisms themselves form a seminormed group with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance toSeminormedAddCommGroup : SeminormedAddCommGroup (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := opNorm
map_zero' := opNorm_zero
neg' := opNorm_neg
add_le' := opNorm_add_le }
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddGroupHom.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- Normed group homomorphisms themselves form a normed group with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance toNormedAddCommGroup {V₁ V₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₁] [NormedAddCommGroup V₂] :
NormedAddCommGroup (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := opNorm
map_zero' := opNorm_zero
neg' := opNorm_neg
add_le' := opNorm_add_le
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun _f => opNorm_zero_iff.1 }
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_normed_add_comm_group NormedAddGroupHom.toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Coercion of a `NormedAddGroupHom` is an `AddMonoidHom`. Similar to `AddMonoidHom.coeFn`. -/
@[simps]
def coeAddHom : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂ →+ V₁ → V₂ where
toFun := DFunLike.coe
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_fn_add_hom NormedAddGroupHom.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : V₁ → V₂) :=
map_sum coeAddHom f s
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_sum NormedAddGroupHom.coe_sum
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Hom.lean | 623 | 624 | theorem sum_apply {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) v = ∑ i ∈ s, f i v := by | simp only [coe_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.trails from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"edaaaa4a5774e6623e0ddd919b2f2db49c65add4"
/-!
# Trails and Eulerian trails
This module contains additional theory about trails, including Eulerian trails (also known
as Eulerian circuits).
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian` is the predicate that a trail is an Eulerian trail.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.even_countP_edges_iff` gives a condition on the number of edges
in a trail that can be incident to a given vertex.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.even_degree_iff` gives a condition on the degrees of vertices
when there exists an Eulerian trail.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.card_odd_degree` gives the possible numbers of odd-degree
vertices when there exists an Eulerian trail.
## Todo
* Prove that there exists an Eulerian trail when the conclusion to
`SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.card_odd_degree` holds.
## Tags
Eulerian trails
-/
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} {G : SimpleGraph V}
namespace Walk
/-- The edges of a trail as a finset, since each edge in a trail appears exactly once. -/
abbrev IsTrail.edgesFinset {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail) : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
⟨p.edges, h.edges_nodup⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.edges_finset SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.edgesFinset
variable [DecidableEq V]
theorem IsTrail.even_countP_edges_iff {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (ht : p.IsTrail) (x : V) :
Even (p.edges.countP fun e => x ∈ e) ↔ u ≠ v → x ≠ u ∧ x ≠ v := by
induction' p with u u v w huv p ih
· simp
· rw [cons_isTrail_iff] at ht
specialize ih ht.1
simp only [List.countP_cons, Ne, edges_cons, Sym2.mem_iff]
split_ifs with h
· rw [decide_eq_true_eq] at h
obtain (rfl | rfl) := h
· rw [Nat.even_add_one, ih]
simp only [huv.ne, imp_false, Ne, not_false_iff, true_and_iff, not_forall,
Classical.not_not, exists_prop, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and_iff,
and_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro rfl rfl
exact G.loopless _ huv
· rw [Nat.even_add_one, ih, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [huv.ne.symm, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and_iff, not_forall,
not_false_iff, exists_prop, and_true_iff, Classical.not_not, true_and_iff, iff_and_self]
rintro rfl
exact huv.ne
· rw [decide_eq_true_eq, not_or] at h
simp only [h.1, h.2, not_false_iff, true_and_iff, add_zero, Ne] at ih ⊢
rw [ih]
constructor <;>
· rintro h' h'' rfl
simp only [imp_false, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Classical.not_not] at h'
cases h'
simp only [not_true, and_false, false_and] at h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.even_countp_edges_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.even_countP_edges_iff
/-- An *Eulerian trail* (also known as an "Eulerian path") is a walk
`p` that visits every edge exactly once. The lemma `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.IsTrail` shows
that these are trails.
Combine with `p.IsCircuit` to get an Eulerian circuit (also known as an "Eulerian cycle"). -/
def IsEulerian {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Prop :=
∀ e, e ∈ G.edgeSet → p.edges.count e = 1
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian
theorem IsEulerian.isTrail {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsEulerian) : p.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, List.nodup_iff_count_le_one]
intro e
by_cases he : e ∈ p.edges
· exact (h e (edges_subset_edgeSet _ he)).le
· simp [he]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian.is_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.isTrail
theorem IsEulerian.mem_edges_iff {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsEulerian) {e : Sym2 V} :
e ∈ p.edges ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
⟨ fun h => p.edges_subset_edgeSet h
, fun he => by simpa [Nat.succ_le] using (h e he).ge ⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian.mem_edges_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.mem_edges_iff
/-- The edge set of an Eulerian graph is finite. -/
def IsEulerian.fintypeEdgeSet {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsEulerian) :
Fintype G.edgeSet :=
Fintype.ofFinset h.isTrail.edgesFinset fun e => by
simp only [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, h.mem_edges_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian.fintype_edge_set SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.fintypeEdgeSet
theorem IsTrail.isEulerian_of_forall_mem {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
(hc : ∀ e, e ∈ G.edgeSet → e ∈ p.edges) : p.IsEulerian := fun e he =>
List.count_eq_one_of_mem h.edges_nodup (hc e he)
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.is_eulerian_of_forall_mem SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.isEulerian_of_forall_mem
theorem isEulerian_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.IsEulerian ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ ∀ e, e ∈ G.edgeSet → e ∈ p.edges := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.isTrail, fun _ => h.mem_edges_iff.mpr⟩
· rintro ⟨h, hl⟩
exact h.isEulerian_of_forall_mem hl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.isEulerian_iff
theorem IsEulerian.edgesFinset_eq [Fintype G.edgeSet] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v}
(h : p.IsEulerian) : h.isTrail.edgesFinset = G.edgeFinset := by
ext e
simp [h.mem_edges_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian.edges_finset_eq SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.edgesFinset_eq
theorem IsEulerian.even_degree_iff {x u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (ht : p.IsEulerian) [Fintype V]
[DecidableRel G.Adj] : Even (G.degree x) ↔ u ≠ v → x ≠ u ∧ x ≠ v := by
convert ht.isTrail.even_countP_edges_iff x
rw [← Multiset.coe_countP, Multiset.countP_eq_card_filter, ← card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree]
change Multiset.card _ = _
congr 1
convert_to _ = (ht.isTrail.edgesFinset.filter (Membership.mem x)).val
have : Fintype G.edgeSet := fintypeEdgeSet ht
rw [ht.edgesFinset_eq, G.incidenceFinset_eq_filter x]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian.even_degree_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.even_degree_iff
theorem IsEulerian.card_filter_odd_degree [Fintype V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {u v : V}
{p : G.Walk u v} (ht : p.IsEulerian) {s}
(h : s = (Finset.univ : Finset V).filter fun v => Odd (G.degree v)) :
s.card = 0 ∨ s.card = 2 := by
subst s
simp only [Nat.odd_iff_not_even, Finset.card_eq_zero]
simp only [ht.even_degree_iff, Ne, not_forall, not_and, Classical.not_not, exists_prop]
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne u v
· left
simp
· right
convert_to _ = ({u, v} : Finset V).card
· simp [hn]
· congr
ext x
simp [hn, imp_iff_not_or]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_eulerian.card_filter_odd_degree SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.card_filter_odd_degree
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Trails.lean | 163 | 169 | theorem IsEulerian.card_odd_degree [Fintype V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v}
(ht : p.IsEulerian) : Fintype.card { v : V | Odd (G.degree v) } = 0 ∨
Fintype.card { v : V | Odd (G.degree v) } = 2 := by |
rw [← Set.toFinset_card]
apply IsEulerian.card_filter_odd_degree ht
ext v
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.factorization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Prime factorizations
`n.factorization` is the finitely supported function `ℕ →₀ ℕ`
mapping each prime factor of `n` to its multiplicity in `n`. For example, since 2000 = 2^4 * 5^3,
* `factorization 2000 2` is 4
* `factorization 2000 5` is 3
* `factorization 2000 k` is 0 for all other `k : ℕ`.
## TODO
* As discussed in this Zulip thread:
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/217875/topic/Multiplicity.20in.20the.20naturals
We have lots of disparate ways of talking about the multiplicity of a prime
in a natural number, including `factors.count`, `padicValNat`, `multiplicity`,
and the material in `Data/PNat/Factors`. Move some of this material to this file,
prove results about the relationships between these definitions,
and (where appropriate) choose a uniform canonical way of expressing these ideas.
* Moreover, the results here should be generalised to an arbitrary unique factorization monoid
with a normalization function, and then deduplicated. The basics of this have been started in
`RingTheory/UniqueFactorizationDomain`.
* Extend the inductions to any `NormalizationMonoid` with unique factorization.
-/
-- Workaround for lean4#2038
attribute [-instance] instBEqNat
open Nat Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-- `n.factorization` is the finitely supported function `ℕ →₀ ℕ`
mapping each prime factor of `n` to its multiplicity in `n`. -/
def factorization (n : ℕ) : ℕ →₀ ℕ where
support := n.primeFactors
toFun p := if p.Prime then padicValNat p n else 0
mem_support_toFun := by simp [not_or]; aesop
#align nat.factorization Nat.factorization
/-- The support of `n.factorization` is exactly `n.primeFactors`. -/
@[simp] lemma support_factorization (n : ℕ) : (factorization n).support = n.primeFactors := rfl
theorem factorization_def (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : n.factorization p = padicValNat p n := by
simpa [factorization] using absurd pp
#align nat.factorization_def Nat.factorization_def
/-- We can write both `n.factorization p` and `n.factors.count p` to represent the power
of `p` in the factorization of `n`: we declare the former to be the simp-normal form. -/
@[simp]
theorem factors_count_eq {n p : ℕ} : n.factors.count p = n.factorization p := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn0)
· simp [factorization, count]
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt prime_of_mem_factors pp)]
simp [factorization, pp]
simp only [factorization_def _ pp]
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
exact List.le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.mp le_rfl |>.subperm
· rw [← lt_add_one_iff, lt_iff_not_ge, ge_iff_le,
le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
intro h
have := h.count_le p
simp at this
#align nat.factors_count_eq Nat.factors_count_eq
theorem factorization_eq_factors_multiset (n : ℕ) :
n.factorization = Multiset.toFinsupp (n.factors : Multiset ℕ) := by
ext p
simp
#align nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset Nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset
theorem multiplicity_eq_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
multiplicity p n = n.factorization p := by
simp [factorization, pp, padicValNat_def' pp.ne_one hn.bot_lt]
#align nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization Nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 99 | 102 | theorem factorization_prod_pow_eq_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization.prod (· ^ ·) = n := by |
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp only [← prod_toMultiset, factorization, Multiset.prod_coe, Multiset.toFinsupp_toMultiset]
exact prod_factors hn
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.FunctorN
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.normalized from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
/-!
# Comparison with the normalized Moore complex functor
In this file, we show that when the category `A` is abelian,
there is an isomorphism `N₁_iso_normalizedMooreComplex_comp_toKaroubi` between
the functor `N₁ : SimplicialObject A ⥤ Karoubi (ChainComplex A ℕ)`
defined in `FunctorN.lean` and the composition of
`normalizedMooreComplex A` with the inclusion
`ChainComplex A ℕ ⥤ Karoubi (ChainComplex A ℕ)`.
This isomorphism shall be used in `Equivalence.lean` in order to obtain
the Dold-Kan equivalence
`CategoryTheory.Abelian.DoldKan.equivalence : SimplicialObject A ≌ ChainComplex A ℕ`
with a functor (definitionally) equal to `normalizedMooreComplex A`.
(See `Equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan equivalence.)
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
CategoryTheory.Subobject CategoryTheory.Idempotents DoldKan
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
universe v
variable {A : Type*} [Category A] [Abelian A] {X : SimplicialObject A}
theorem HigherFacesVanish.inclusionOfMooreComplexMap (n : ℕ) :
HigherFacesVanish (n + 1) ((inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X).f (n + 1)) := fun j _ => by
dsimp [AlgebraicTopology.inclusionOfMooreComplexMap, NormalizedMooreComplex.objX]
rw [← factorThru_arrow _ _ (finset_inf_arrow_factors Finset.univ _ j
(by simp only [Finset.mem_univ])), assoc, kernelSubobject_arrow_comp, comp_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.higher_faces_vanish.inclusion_of_Moore_complex_map AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.HigherFacesVanish.inclusionOfMooreComplexMap
theorem factors_normalizedMooreComplex_PInfty (n : ℕ) :
Subobject.Factors (NormalizedMooreComplex.objX X n) (PInfty.f n) := by
rcases n with _|n
· apply top_factors
· rw [PInfty_f, NormalizedMooreComplex.objX, finset_inf_factors]
intro i _
apply kernelSubobject_factors
exact (HigherFacesVanish.of_P (n + 1) n) i le_add_self
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.factors_normalized_Moore_complex_P_infty AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.factors_normalizedMooreComplex_PInfty
/-- `PInfty` factors through the normalized Moore complex -/
@[simps!]
def PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex (X : SimplicialObject A) : K[X] ⟶ N[X] :=
ChainComplex.ofHom _ _ _ _ _ _
(fun n => factorThru _ _ (factors_normalizedMooreComplex_PInfty n)) fun n => by
rw [← cancel_mono (NormalizedMooreComplex.objX X n).arrow, assoc, assoc, factorThru_arrow,
← inclusionOfMooreComplexMap_f, ← normalizedMooreComplex_objD,
← (inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X).comm (n + 1) n, inclusionOfMooreComplexMap_f,
factorThru_arrow_assoc, ← alternatingFaceMapComplex_obj_d]
exact PInfty.comm (n + 1) n
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_to_normalized_Moore_complex AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_comp_inclusionOfMooreComplexMap (X : SimplicialObject A) :
PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X ≫ inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X = PInfty := by aesop_cat
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_to_normalized_Moore_complex_comp_inclusion_of_Moore_complex_map AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_comp_inclusionOfMooreComplexMap
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_naturality {X Y : SimplicialObject A} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
AlternatingFaceMapComplex.map f ≫ PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex Y =
PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X ≫ NormalizedMooreComplex.map f := by
aesop_cat
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_to_normalized_Moore_complex_naturality AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Normalized.lean | 91 | 92 | theorem PInfty_comp_PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex (X : SimplicialObject A) :
PInfty ≫ PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X = PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X := by | aesop_cat
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
#align_import category_theory.simple from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4ed0bcaef698011b0692b93a042a2282f490f6b6"
/-!
# Simple objects
We define simple objects in any category with zero morphisms.
A simple object is an object `Y` such that any monomorphism `f : X ⟶ Y`
is either an isomorphism or zero (but not both).
This is formalized as a `Prop` valued typeclass `Simple X`.
In some contexts, especially representation theory, simple objects are called "irreducibles".
If a morphism `f` out of a simple object is nonzero and has a kernel, then that kernel is zero.
(We state this as `kernel.ι f = 0`, but should add `kernel f ≅ 0`.)
When the category is abelian, being simple is the same as being cosimple (although we do not
state a separate typeclass for this).
As a consequence, any nonzero epimorphism out of a simple object is an isomorphism,
and any nonzero morphism into a simple object has trivial cokernel.
We show that any simple object is indecomposable.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- An object is simple if monomorphisms into it are (exclusively) either isomorphisms or zero. -/
class Simple (X : C) : Prop where
mono_isIso_iff_nonzero : ∀ {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [Mono f], IsIso f ↔ f ≠ 0
#align category_theory.simple CategoryTheory.Simple
/-- A nonzero monomorphism to a simple object is an isomorphism. -/
theorem isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} [Mono f] (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso f :=
(Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero f).mpr w
#align category_theory.is_iso_of_mono_of_nonzero CategoryTheory.isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Simple.lean | 61 | 77 | theorem Simple.of_iso {X Y : C} [Simple Y] (i : X ≅ Y) : Simple X :=
{ mono_isIso_iff_nonzero := fun f m => by
haveI : Mono (f ≫ i.hom) := mono_comp _ _
constructor
· intro h w
have j : IsIso (f ≫ i.hom) := by | infer_instance
rw [Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero] at j
subst w
simp at j
· intro h
have j : IsIso (f ≫ i.hom) := by
apply isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero
intro w
apply h
simpa using (cancel_mono i.inv).2 w
rw [← Category.comp_id f, ← i.hom_inv_id, ← Category.assoc]
infer_instance }
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import data.part from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"80c43012d26f63026d362c3aba28f3c3bafb07e6"
/-!
# Partial values of a type
This file defines `Part α`, the partial values of a type.
`o : Part α` carries a proposition `o.Dom`, its domain, along with a function `get : o.Dom → α`, its
value. The rule is then that every partial value has a value but, to access it, you need to provide
a proof of the domain.
`Part α` behaves the same as `Option α` except that `o : Option α` is decidably `none` or `some a`
for some `a : α`, while the domain of `o : Part α` doesn't have to be decidable. That means you can
translate back and forth between a partial value with a decidable domain and an option, and
`Option α` and `Part α` are classically equivalent. In general, `Part α` is bigger than `Option α`.
In current mathlib, `Part ℕ`, aka `PartENat`, is used to move decidability of the order to
decidability of `PartENat.find` (which is the smallest natural satisfying a predicate, or `∞` if
there's none).
## Main declarations
`Option`-like declarations:
* `Part.none`: The partial value whose domain is `False`.
* `Part.some a`: The partial value whose domain is `True` and whose value is `a`.
* `Part.ofOption`: Converts an `Option α` to a `Part α` by sending `none` to `none` and `some a` to
`some a`.
* `Part.toOption`: Converts a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an `Option α`.
* `Part.equivOption`: Classical equivalence between `Part α` and `Option α`.
Monadic structure:
* `Part.bind`: `o.bind f` has value `(f (o.get _)).get _` (`f o` morally) and is defined when `o`
and `f (o.get _)` are defined.
* `Part.map`: Maps the value and keeps the same domain.
Other:
* `Part.restrict`: `Part.restrict p o` replaces the domain of `o : Part α` by `p : Prop` so long as
`p → o.Dom`.
* `Part.assert`: `assert p f` appends `p` to the domains of the values of a partial function.
* `Part.unwrap`: Gets the value of a partial value regardless of its domain. Unsound.
## Notation
For `a : α`, `o : Part α`, `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a`. Formally, it means
`o.Dom` and `o.get _ = a`.
-/
open Function
/-- `Part α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `Option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
/-- The domain of a partial value -/
Dom : Prop
/-- Extract a value from a partial value given a proof of `Dom` -/
get : Dom → α
#align part Part
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
#align part.to_option Part.toOption
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_some Part.toOption_isSome
@[simp] lemma toOption_isNone (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isNone ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_none Part.toOption_isNone
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
#align part.ext' Part.ext'
/-- `Part` eta expansion -/
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align part.eta Part.eta
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def Mem (a : α) (o : Part α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
#align part.mem Part.Mem
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
#align part.mem_eq Part.mem_eq
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
#align part.dom_iff_mem Part.dom_iff_mem
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.get_mem Part.get_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.mem_mk_iff Part.mem_mk_iff
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
#align part.ext Part.ext
/-- The `none` value in `Part` has a `False` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
#align part.none Part.none
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
#align part.not_mem_none Part.not_mem_none
/-- The `some a` value in `Part` has a `True` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
#align part.some Part.some
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
#align part.some_dom Part.some_dom
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
#align part.mem_unique Part.mem_unique
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
#align part.mem.left_unique Part.Mem.left_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
#align part.get_eq_of_mem Part.get_eq_of_mem
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
#align part.subsingleton Part.subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
#align part.get_some Part.get_some
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_some Part.mem_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
#align part.mem_some_iff Part.mem_some_iff
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align part.eq_some_iff Part.eq_some_iff
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff Part.eq_none_iff
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff' Part.eq_none_iff'
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
#align part.not_none_dom Part.not_none_dom
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
#align part.some_ne_none Part.some_ne_none
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
#align part.none_ne_some Part.none_ne_some
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
#align part.ne_none_iff Part.ne_none_iff
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
#align part.eq_none_or_eq_some Part.eq_none_or_eq_some
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
#align part.some_injective Part.some_injective
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
#align part.some_inj Part.some_inj
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
#align part.some_get Part.some_get
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_eq_some Part.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
#align part.get_eq_get_of_eq Part.get_eq_get_of_eq
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_mem Part.get_eq_iff_mem
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
#align part.eq_get_iff_mem Part.eq_get_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
#align part.none_to_option Part.none_toOption
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
#align part.some_to_option Part.some_toOption
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
#align part.none_decidable Part.noneDecidable
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
#align part.some_decidable Part.someDecidable
/-- Retrieves the value of `a : Part α` if it exists, and return the provided default value
otherwise. -/
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
#align part.get_or_else Part.getOrElse
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.get_or_else_of_dom Part.getOrElse_of_dom
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
#align part.get_or_else_of_not_dom Part.getOrElse_of_not_dom
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
#align part.get_or_else_none Part.getOrElse_none
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
#align part.get_or_else_some Part.getOrElse_some
-- Porting note: removed `simp`
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
#align part.mem_to_option Part.mem_toOption
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem, like `mem_toOption` but with LHS in `simp` normal form
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.dom.to_option Part.Dom.toOption
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
#align part.to_option_eq_none_iff Part.toOption_eq_none_iff
/- Porting TODO: Removed `simp`. Maybe add `@[simp]` later if `@[simp]` is taken off definition of
`Option.elim` -/
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
#align part.elim_to_option Part.elim_toOption
/-- Converts an `Option α` into a `Part α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
#align part.of_option Part.ofOption
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
#align part.mem_of_option Part.mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
#align part.of_option_dom Part.ofOption_dom
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
#align part.of_option_eq_get Part.ofOption_eq_get
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
#align part.mem_coe Part.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
#align part.coe_none Part.coe_none
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.coe_some Part.coe_some
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
#align part.induction_on Part.induction_on
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
#align part.of_option_decidable Part.ofOptionDecidable
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
#align part.to_of_option Part.to_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
#align part.of_to_option Part.of_toOption
/-- `Part α` is (classically) equivalent to `Option α`. -/
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
#align part.equiv_option Part.equivOption
/-- We give `Part α` the order where everything is greater than `none`. -/
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl x y := id
le_trans x y z f g i := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm x y f g := Part.ext fun z => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
#align part.le_total_of_le_of_le Part.le_total_of_le_of_le
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
#align part.assert Part.assert
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
#align part.bind Part.bind
/-- The map operation for `Part` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
#align part.map Part.map
#align part.map_dom Part.map_Dom
#align part.map_get Part.map_get
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_map Part.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
#align part.mem_map_iff Part.mem_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.map_none Part.map_none
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
#align part.map_some Part.map_some
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_assert Part.mem_assert
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
#align part.mem_assert_iff Part.mem_assert_iff
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· aesop
#align part.assert_pos Part.assert_pos
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 479 | 484 | theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by |
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
import Mathlib.Algebra.PUnitInstances
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.Mon_ from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a836c6dba9bd1ee2a0cdc9af0006a596f243031c"
/-!
# The category of monoids in a monoidal category.
We define monoids in a monoidal category `C` and show that the category of monoids is equivalent to
the category of lax monoidal functors from the unit monoidal category to `C`. We also show that if
`C` is braided, then the category of monoids is naturally monoidal.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂ u
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
/-- A monoid object internal to a monoidal category.
When the monoidal category is preadditive, this is also sometimes called an "algebra object".
-/
structure Mon_ where
X : C
one : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X
mul : X ⊗ X ⟶ X
one_mul : (one ▷ X) ≫ mul = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
mul_one : (X ◁ one) ≫ mul = (ρ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
-- Obviously there is some flexibility stating this axiom.
-- This one has left- and right-hand sides matching the statement of `Monoid.mul_assoc`,
-- and chooses to place the associator on the right-hand side.
-- The heuristic is that unitors and associators "don't have much weight".
mul_assoc : (mul ▷ X) ≫ mul = (α_ X X X).hom ≫ (X ◁ mul) ≫ mul := by aesop_cat
#align Mon_ Mon_
attribute [reassoc] Mon_.one_mul Mon_.mul_one
attribute [simp] Mon_.one_mul Mon_.mul_one
-- We prove a more general `@[simp]` lemma below.
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Mon_.mul_assoc
namespace Mon_
/-- The trivial monoid object. We later show this is initial in `Mon_ C`.
-/
@[simps]
def trivial : Mon_ C where
X := 𝟙_ C
one := 𝟙 _
mul := (λ_ _).hom
mul_assoc := by coherence
mul_one := by coherence
#align Mon_.trivial Mon_.trivial
instance : Inhabited (Mon_ C) :=
⟨trivial C⟩
variable {C}
variable {M : Mon_ C}
@[simp]
theorem one_mul_hom {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ M.X) : (M.one ⊗ f) ≫ M.mul = (λ_ Z).hom ≫ f := by
rw [tensorHom_def'_assoc, M.one_mul, leftUnitor_naturality]
#align Mon_.one_mul_hom Mon_.one_mul_hom
@[simp]
theorem mul_one_hom {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ M.X) : (f ⊗ M.one) ≫ M.mul = (ρ_ Z).hom ≫ f := by
rw [tensorHom_def_assoc, M.mul_one, rightUnitor_naturality]
#align Mon_.mul_one_hom Mon_.mul_one_hom
theorem assoc_flip :
(M.X ◁ M.mul) ≫ M.mul = (α_ M.X M.X M.X).inv ≫ (M.mul ▷ M.X) ≫ M.mul := by simp
#align Mon_.assoc_flip Mon_.assoc_flip
/-- A morphism of monoid objects. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (M N : Mon_ C) where
hom : M.X ⟶ N.X
one_hom : M.one ≫ hom = N.one := by aesop_cat
mul_hom : M.mul ≫ hom = (hom ⊗ hom) ≫ N.mul := by aesop_cat
#align Mon_.hom Mon_.Hom
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.one_hom Hom.mul_hom
/-- The identity morphism on a monoid object. -/
@[simps]
def id (M : Mon_ C) : Hom M M where
hom := 𝟙 M.X
#align Mon_.id Mon_.id
instance homInhabited (M : Mon_ C) : Inhabited (Hom M M) :=
⟨id M⟩
#align Mon_.hom_inhabited Mon_.homInhabited
/-- Composition of morphisms of monoid objects. -/
@[simps]
def comp {M N O : Mon_ C} (f : Hom M N) (g : Hom N O) : Hom M O where
hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom
#align Mon_.comp Mon_.comp
instance : Category (Mon_ C) where
Hom M N := Hom M N
id := id
comp f g := comp f g
-- Porting note: added, as `Hom.ext` does not apply to a morphism.
@[ext]
lemma ext {X Y : Mon_ C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g :=
Hom.ext _ _ w
@[simp]
theorem id_hom' (M : Mon_ C) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M).hom = 𝟙 M.X :=
rfl
#align Mon_.id_hom' Mon_.id_hom'
@[simp]
theorem comp_hom' {M N K : Mon_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
(f ≫ g : Hom M K).hom = f.hom ≫ g.hom :=
rfl
#align Mon_.comp_hom' Mon_.comp_hom'
section
variable (C)
/-- The forgetful functor from monoid objects to the ambient category. -/
@[simps]
def forget : Mon_ C ⥤ C where
obj A := A.X
map f := f.hom
#align Mon_.forget Mon_.forget
end
instance forget_faithful : (forget C).Faithful where
#align Mon_.forget_faithful Mon_.forget_faithful
instance {A B : Mon_ C} (f : A ⟶ B) [e : IsIso ((forget C).map f)] : IsIso f.hom :=
e
/-- The forgetful functor from monoid objects to the ambient category reflects isomorphisms. -/
instance : (forget C).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects f e :=
⟨⟨{ hom := inv f.hom
mul_hom := by
simp only [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Hom.mul_hom, Category.assoc, ← tensor_comp_assoc,
IsIso.inv_hom_id, tensor_id, Category.id_comp] },
by aesop_cat⟩⟩
/-- Construct an isomorphism of monoids by giving an isomorphism between the underlying objects
and checking compatibility with unit and multiplication only in the forward direction.
-/
@[simps]
def mkIso {M N : Mon_ C} (f : M.X ≅ N.X) (one_f : M.one ≫ f.hom = N.one := by aesop_cat)
(mul_f : M.mul ≫ f.hom = (f.hom ⊗ f.hom) ≫ N.mul := by aesop_cat) : M ≅ N where
hom :=
{ hom := f.hom
one_hom := one_f
mul_hom := mul_f }
inv :=
{ hom := f.inv
one_hom := by rw [← one_f]; simp
mul_hom := by
rw [← cancel_mono f.hom]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [mul_f]
simp }
#align Mon_.iso_of_iso Mon_.mkIso
instance uniqueHomFromTrivial (A : Mon_ C) : Unique (trivial C ⟶ A) where
default :=
{ hom := A.one
one_hom := by dsimp; simp
mul_hom := by dsimp; simp [A.one_mul, unitors_equal] }
uniq f := by
ext; simp
rw [← Category.id_comp f.hom]
erw [f.one_hom]
#align Mon_.unique_hom_from_trivial Mon_.uniqueHomFromTrivial
open CategoryTheory.Limits
instance : HasInitial (Mon_ C) :=
hasInitial_of_unique (trivial C)
end Mon_
namespace CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor
variable {C} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D]
-- TODO: mapMod F A : Mod A ⥤ Mod (F.mapMon A)
/-- A lax monoidal functor takes monoid objects to monoid objects.
That is, a lax monoidal functor `F : C ⥤ D` induces a functor `Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D`.
-/
@[simps]
def mapMon (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) : Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D where
obj A :=
{ X := F.obj A.X
one := F.ε ≫ F.map A.one
mul := F.μ _ _ ≫ F.map A.mul
one_mul := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc, left_unitality]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.toFunctor.map_comp, A.one_mul]
mul_one := by
simp_rw [MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc,
right_unitality]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.toFunctor.map_comp, A.mul_one]
mul_assoc := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.toFunctor.map_comp, A.mul_assoc]
simp }
map f :=
{ hom := F.map f.hom
one_hom := by dsimp; rw [Category.assoc, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp, f.one_hom]
mul_hom := by
dsimp
rw [Category.assoc, F.μ_natural_assoc, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp,
f.mul_hom] }
map_id A := by ext; simp
map_comp f g := by ext; simp
#align category_theory.lax_monoidal_functor.map_Mon CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor.mapMon
variable (C D)
/-- `mapMon` is functorial in the lax monoidal functor. -/
@[simps] -- Porting note: added this, not sure how it worked previously without.
def mapMonFunctor : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D ⥤ Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D where
obj := mapMon
map α := { app := fun A => { hom := α.app A.X } }
#align category_theory.lax_monoidal_functor.map_Mon_functor CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor.mapMonFunctor
end CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor
namespace Mon_
open CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor
namespace EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps]
def laxMonoidalToMon : LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C ⥤ Mon_ C where
obj F := (F.mapMon : Mon_ _ ⥤ Mon_ C).obj (trivial (Discrete PUnit))
map α := ((mapMonFunctor (Discrete PUnit) C).map α).app _
#align Mon_.equiv_lax_monoidal_functor_punit.lax_monoidal_to_Mon Mon_.EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit.laxMonoidalToMon
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps]
def monToLaxMonoidal : Mon_ C ⥤ LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C where
obj A :=
{ obj := fun _ => A.X
map := fun _ => 𝟙 _
ε := A.one
μ := fun _ _ => A.mul
map_id := fun _ => rfl
map_comp := fun _ _ => (Category.id_comp (𝟙 A.X)).symm }
map f :=
{ app := fun _ => f.hom
naturality := fun _ _ _ => by dsimp; rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
unit := f.one_hom
tensor := fun _ _ => f.mul_hom }
#align Mon_.equiv_lax_monoidal_functor_punit.Mon_to_lax_monoidal Mon_.EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit.monToLaxMonoidal
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
attribute [local simp] eqToIso_map
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps!]
def unitIso :
𝟭 (LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C) ≅ laxMonoidalToMon C ⋙ monToLaxMonoidal C :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun F =>
MonoidalNatIso.ofComponents (fun _ => F.toFunctor.mapIso (eqToIso (by ext))) (by aesop_cat)
(by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat))
(by aesop_cat)
#align Mon_.equiv_lax_monoidal_functor_punit.unit_iso Mon_.EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit.unitIso
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps!]
def counitIso : monToLaxMonoidal C ⋙ laxMonoidalToMon C ≅ 𝟭 (Mon_ C) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun F =>
{ hom := { hom := 𝟙 _ }
inv := { hom := 𝟙 _ } })
(by aesop_cat)
#align Mon_.equiv_lax_monoidal_functor_punit.counit_iso Mon_.EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit.counitIso
end EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit
open EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit
attribute [local simp] eqToIso_map
/--
Monoid objects in `C` are "just" lax monoidal functors from the trivial monoidal category to `C`.
-/
@[simps]
def equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit : LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C ≌ Mon_ C where
functor := laxMonoidalToMon C
inverse := monToLaxMonoidal C
unitIso := unitIso C
counitIso := counitIso C
#align Mon_.equiv_lax_monoidal_functor_punit Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit
end Mon_
namespace Mon_
/-!
In this section, we prove that the category of monoids in a braided monoidal category is monoidal.
Given two monoids `M` and `N` in a braided monoidal category `C`,
the multiplication on the tensor product `M.X ⊗ N.X` is defined in the obvious way:
it is the tensor product of the multiplications on `M` and `N`,
except that the tensor factors in the source come in the wrong order,
which we fix by pre-composing with a permutation isomorphism constructed from the braiding.
(There is a subtlety here: in fact there are two ways to do these,
using either the positive or negative crossing.)
A more conceptual way of understanding this definition is the following:
The braiding on `C` gives rise to a monoidal structure on
the tensor product functor from `C × C` to `C`.
A pair of monoids in `C` gives rise to a monoid in `C × C`,
which the tensor product functor by being monoidal takes to a monoid in `C`.
The permutation isomorphism appearing in the definition of
the multiplication on the tensor product of two monoids is
an instance of a more general family of isomorphisms
which together form a strength that equips the tensor product functor with a monoidal structure,
and the monoid axioms for the tensor product follow from the monoid axioms for the tensor factors
plus the properties of the strength (i.e., monoidal functor axioms).
The strength `tensor_μ` of the tensor product functor has been defined in
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided`.
Its properties, stated as independent lemmas in that module,
are used extensively in the proofs below.
Notice that we could have followed the above plan not only conceptually
but also as a possible implementation and
could have constructed the tensor product of monoids via `mapMon`,
but we chose to give a more explicit definition directly in terms of `tensor_μ`.
To complete the definition of the monoidal category structure on the category of monoids,
we need to provide definitions of associator and unitors.
The obvious candidates are the associator and unitors from `C`,
but we need to prove that they are monoid morphisms, i.e., compatible with unit and multiplication.
These properties translate to the monoidality of the associator and unitors
(with respect to the monoidal structures on the functors they relate),
which have also been proved in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided`.
-/
variable {C}
-- The proofs that associators and unitors preserve monoid units don't require braiding.
theorem one_associator {M N P : Mon_ C} :
((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ ((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (M.one ⊗ N.one) ⊗ P.one)) ≫ (α_ M.X N.X P.X).hom =
(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (M.one ⊗ (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (N.one ⊗ P.one)) := by
simp only [Category.assoc, Iso.cancel_iso_inv_left]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← Category.id_comp P.one, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_naturality]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← Category.id_comp M.one, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [tensorHom_id, ← leftUnitor_tensor_inv]
rw [← cancel_epi (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [leftUnitor_inv_naturality]
simp
#align Mon_.one_associator Mon_.one_associator
theorem one_leftUnitor {M : Mon_ C} :
((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (𝟙 (𝟙_ C) ⊗ M.one)) ≫ (λ_ M.X).hom = M.one := by
simp
#align Mon_.one_left_unitor Mon_.one_leftUnitor
theorem one_rightUnitor {M : Mon_ C} :
((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (M.one ⊗ 𝟙 (𝟙_ C))) ≫ (ρ_ M.X).hom = M.one := by
simp [← unitors_equal]
#align Mon_.one_right_unitor Mon_.one_rightUnitor
section BraidedCategory
variable [BraidedCategory C]
theorem Mon_tensor_one_mul (M N : Mon_ C) :
(((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (M.one ⊗ N.one)) ▷ (M.X ⊗ N.X)) ≫
tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul) =
(λ_ (M.X ⊗ N.X)).hom := by
simp only [comp_whiskerRight_assoc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [tensor_μ_natural_left]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← tensor_comp, one_mul M, one_mul N]
symm
exact tensor_left_unitality C M.X N.X
#align Mon_.Mon_tensor_one_mul Mon_.Mon_tensor_one_mul
theorem Mon_tensor_mul_one (M N : Mon_ C) :
(M.X ⊗ N.X) ◁ ((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (M.one ⊗ N.one)) ≫
tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul) =
(ρ_ (M.X ⊗ N.X)).hom := by
simp only [MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [tensor_μ_natural_right]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← tensor_comp, mul_one M, mul_one N]
symm
exact tensor_right_unitality C M.X N.X
#align Mon_.Mon_tensor_mul_one Mon_.Mon_tensor_mul_one
theorem Mon_tensor_mul_assoc (M N : Mon_ C) :
((tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul)) ▷ (M.X ⊗ N.X)) ≫
tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul) =
(α_ (M.X ⊗ N.X) (M.X ⊗ N.X) (M.X ⊗ N.X)).hom ≫
((M.X ⊗ N.X) ◁ (tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul))) ≫
tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul) := by
simp only [comp_whiskerRight_assoc, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [tensor_μ_natural_left]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← tensor_comp, mul_assoc M, mul_assoc N, tensor_comp, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [tensor_associativity]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← tensor_μ_natural_right]
simp
#align Mon_.Mon_tensor_mul_assoc Mon_.Mon_tensor_mul_assoc
theorem mul_associator {M N P : Mon_ C} :
(tensor_μ C (M.X ⊗ N.X, P.X) (M.X ⊗ N.X, P.X) ≫
(tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul) ⊗ P.mul)) ≫
(α_ M.X N.X P.X).hom =
((α_ M.X N.X P.X).hom ⊗ (α_ M.X N.X P.X).hom) ≫
tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X ⊗ P.X) (M.X, N.X ⊗ P.X) ≫
(M.mul ⊗ tensor_μ C (N.X, P.X) (N.X, P.X) ≫ (N.mul ⊗ P.mul)) := by
simp only [tensor_obj, prodMonoidal_tensorObj, Category.assoc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← Category.id_comp P.mul, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [associator_naturality]
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← Category.id_comp M.mul, tensor_comp]
simp only [tensorHom_id, id_tensorHom]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [associator_monoidal]
simp only [Category.assoc]
#align Mon_.mul_associator Mon_.mul_associator
theorem mul_leftUnitor {M : Mon_ C} :
(tensor_μ C (𝟙_ C, M.X) (𝟙_ C, M.X) ≫ ((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom ⊗ M.mul)) ≫ (λ_ M.X).hom =
((λ_ M.X).hom ⊗ (λ_ M.X).hom) ≫ M.mul := by
rw [← Category.comp_id (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom, ← Category.id_comp M.mul, tensor_comp]
simp only [tensorHom_id, id_tensorHom]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [leftUnitor_naturality]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← leftUnitor_monoidal]
simp only [Category.assoc, Category.id_comp]
#align Mon_.mul_left_unitor Mon_.mul_leftUnitor
theorem mul_rightUnitor {M : Mon_ C} :
(tensor_μ C (M.X, 𝟙_ C) (M.X, 𝟙_ C) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom)) ≫ (ρ_ M.X).hom =
((ρ_ M.X).hom ⊗ (ρ_ M.X).hom) ≫ M.mul := by
rw [← Category.id_comp M.mul, ← Category.comp_id (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom, tensor_comp]
simp only [tensorHom_id, id_tensorHom]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [rightUnitor_naturality]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← rightUnitor_monoidal]
simp only [Category.assoc, Category.id_comp]
#align Mon_.mul_right_unitor Mon_.mul_rightUnitor
@[simps tensorObj_X tensorHom_hom]
instance monMonoidalStruct : MonoidalCategoryStruct (Mon_ C) :=
let tensorObj (M N : Mon_ C) : Mon_ C :=
{ X := M.X ⊗ N.X
one := (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (M.one ⊗ N.one)
mul := tensor_μ C (M.X, N.X) (M.X, N.X) ≫ (M.mul ⊗ N.mul)
one_mul := Mon_tensor_one_mul M N
mul_one := Mon_tensor_mul_one M N
mul_assoc := Mon_tensor_mul_assoc M N }
let tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : Mon_ C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
tensorObj _ _ ⟶ tensorObj _ _ :=
{ hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
one_hom := by
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← tensor_comp, Hom.one_hom f, Hom.one_hom g]
mul_hom := by
dsimp
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [tensor_μ_natural]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← tensor_comp, Hom.mul_hom f, Hom.mul_hom g, tensor_comp]
simp only [Category.assoc] }
{ tensorObj := tensorObj
tensorHom := tensorHom
whiskerRight := fun f Y => tensorHom f (𝟙 Y)
whiskerLeft := fun X _ _ g => tensorHom (𝟙 X) g
tensorUnit := trivial C
associator := fun M N P ↦ mkIso (α_ M.X N.X P.X) one_associator mul_associator
leftUnitor := fun M ↦ mkIso (λ_ M.X) one_leftUnitor mul_leftUnitor
rightUnitor := fun M ↦ mkIso (ρ_ M.X) one_rightUnitor mul_rightUnitor }
@[simp]
theorem tensorUnit_X : (𝟙_ (Mon_ C)).X = 𝟙_ C := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tensorUnit_one : (𝟙_ (Mon_ C)).one = 𝟙 (𝟙_ C) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tensorUnit_mul : (𝟙_ (Mon_ C)).mul = (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tensorObj_one (X Y : Mon_ C) : (X ⊗ Y).one = (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (X.one ⊗ Y.one) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tensorObj_mul (X Y : Mon_ C) :
(X ⊗ Y).mul = tensor_μ C (X.X, Y.X) (X.X, Y.X) ≫ (X.mul ⊗ Y.mul) := rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Mon_.lean | 517 | 519 | theorem whiskerLeft_hom {X Y : Mon_ C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : Mon_ C) :
(f ▷ Z).hom = f.hom ▷ Z.X := by |
rw [← tensorHom_id]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_mod self_sub_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ico_div_zsmul toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ioc_div_zsmul toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ico_mod toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ioc_mod toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_iff toIcoMod_eq_iff
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_iff toIocMod_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_left toIcoDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_left toIocDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_left toIcoMod_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_left toIocMod_apply_left
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_right toIcoDiv_apply_right
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_right toIocDiv_apply_right
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_right toIcoMod_apply_right
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_right toIocMod_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul toIcoDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul' toIcoDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul toIocDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul' toIocDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_add toIcoDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_add toIocDiv_zsmul_add
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul' toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul toIocDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul' toIocDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right toIcoDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right' toIcoDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right toIocDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right' toIocDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ico_div_add_left toIcoDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ico_div_add_left' toIcoDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left toIocDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left' toIocDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub toIcoDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub' toIcoDiv_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub toIocDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub' toIocDiv_sub'
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add' toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add'
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add' toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add'
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
#align to_Ico_div_neg toIcoDiv_neg
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ico_div_neg' toIcoDiv_neg'
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_neg toIocDiv_neg
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ioc_div_neg' toIocDiv_neg'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul toIcoMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 413 | 415 | theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by |
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.CoprodI
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coprod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Complement
/-!
## Pushouts of Monoids and Groups
This file defines wide pushouts of monoids and groups and proves some properties
of the amalgamated product of groups (i.e. the special case where all the maps
in the diagram are injective).
## Main definitions
- `Monoid.PushoutI`: the pushout of a diagram of monoids indexed by a type `ι`
- `Monoid.PushoutI.base`: the map from the amalgamating monoid to the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.of`: the map from each Monoid in the family to the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.lift`: the universal property used to define homomorphisms out of the pushout.
- `Monoid.PushoutI.NormalWord`: a normal form for words in the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.of_injective`: if all the maps in the diagram are injective in a pushout of
groups then so is `of`
- `Monoid.PushoutI.Reduced.eq_empty_of_mem_range`: For any word `w` in the coproduct,
if `w` is reduced (i.e none its letters are in the image of the base monoid), and nonempty, then
`w` itself is not in the image of the base monoid.
## References
* The normal form theorem follows these [notes](https://webspace.maths.qmul.ac.uk/i.m.chiswell/ggt/lecture_notes/lecture2.pdf)
from Queen Mary University
## Tags
amalgamated product, pushout, group
-/
namespace Monoid
open CoprodI Subgroup Coprod Function List
variable {ι : Type*} {G : ι → Type*} {H : Type*} {K : Type*} [Monoid K]
/-- The relation we quotient by to form the pushout -/
def PushoutI.con [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) :
Con (Coprod (CoprodI G) H) :=
conGen (fun x y : Coprod (CoprodI G) H =>
∃ i x', x = inl (of (φ i x')) ∧ y = inr x')
/-- The indexed pushout of monoids, which is the pushout in the category of monoids,
or the category of groups. -/
def PushoutI [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) : Type _ :=
(PushoutI.con φ).Quotient
namespace PushoutI
section Monoid
variable [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
protected instance mul : Mul (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
protected instance one : One (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
instance monoid : Monoid (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.monoid _ with
toMul := PushoutI.mul
toOne := PushoutI.one }
/-- The map from each indexing group into the pushout -/
def of (i : ι) : G i →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp <| inl.comp CoprodI.of
variable (φ) in
/-- The map from the base monoid into the pushout -/
def base : H →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp inr
theorem of_comp_eq_base (i : ι) : (of i).comp (φ i) = (base φ) := by
ext x
apply (Con.eq _).2
refine ConGen.Rel.of _ _ ?_
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
variable (φ) in
theorem of_apply_eq_base (i : ι) (x : H) : of i (φ i x) = base φ x := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, of_comp_eq_base]
/-- Define a homomorphism out of the pushout of monoids be defining it on each object in the
diagram -/
def lift (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k) :
PushoutI φ →* K :=
Con.lift _ (Coprod.lift (CoprodI.lift f) k) <| by
apply Con.conGen_le fun x y => ?_
rintro ⟨i, x', rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, comp_apply] at hf
simp [hf]
@[simp]
theorem lift_of (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
{i : ι} (g : G i) : (lift f k hf) (of i g : PushoutI φ) = f i g := by
delta PushoutI lift of
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe,
lift_apply_inl, CoprodI.lift_of]
@[simp]
theorem lift_base (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
(g : H) : (lift f k hf) (base φ g : PushoutI φ) = k g := by
delta PushoutI lift base
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe, lift_apply_inr]
-- `ext` attribute should be lower priority then `hom_ext_nonempty`
@[ext 1199]
theorem hom_ext {f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _))
(hbase : f.comp (base φ) = g.comp (base φ)) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
Coprod.hom_ext
(CoprodI.ext_hom _ _ h)
hbase
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext_nonempty [hn : Nonempty ι]
{f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _)) : f = g :=
hom_ext h <| by
cases hn with
| intro i =>
ext
rw [← of_comp_eq_base i, ← MonoidHom.comp_assoc, h, MonoidHom.comp_assoc]
/-- The equivalence that is part of the universal property of the pushout. A hom out of
the pushout is just a morphism out of all groups in the pushout that satisfies a commutativity
condition. -/
@[simps]
def homEquiv :
(PushoutI φ →* K) ≃ { f : (Π i, G i →* K) × (H →* K) // ∀ i, (f.1 i).comp (φ i) = f.2 } :=
{ toFun := fun f => ⟨(fun i => f.comp (of i), f.comp (base φ)),
fun i => by rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, of_comp_eq_base]⟩
invFun := fun f => lift f.1.1 f.1.2 f.2,
left_inv := fun _ => hom_ext (by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
(by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff, Function.funext_iff] }
/-- The map from the coproduct into the pushout -/
def ofCoprodI : CoprodI G →* PushoutI φ :=
CoprodI.lift of
@[simp]
theorem ofCoprodI_of (i : ι) (g : G i) :
(ofCoprodI (CoprodI.of g) : PushoutI φ) = of i g := by
simp [ofCoprodI]
theorem induction_on {motive : PushoutI φ → Prop}
(x : PushoutI φ)
(of : ∀ (i : ι) (g : G i), motive (of i g))
(base : ∀ h, motive (base φ h))
(mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y)) : motive x := by
delta PushoutI PushoutI.of PushoutI.base at *
induction x using Con.induction_on with
| H x =>
induction x using Coprod.induction_on with
| inl g =>
induction g using CoprodI.induction_on with
| h_of i g => exact of i g
| h_mul x y ihx ihy =>
rw [map_mul]
exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
| h_one => simpa using base 1
| inr h => exact base h
| mul x y ihx ihy => exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
end Monoid
variable [∀ i, Group (G i)] [Group H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
instance : Group (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.group (PushoutI.con φ) with
toMonoid := PushoutI.monoid }
namespace NormalWord
/-
In this section we show that there is a normal form for words in the amalgamated product. To have a
normal form, we need to pick canonical choice of element of each right coset of the base group. The
choice of element in the base group itself is `1`. Given a choice of element of each right coset,
given by the type `Transversal φ` we can find a normal form. The normal form for an element is an
element of the base group, multiplied by a word in the coproduct, where each letter in the word is
the canonical choice of element of its coset. We then show that all groups in the diagram act
faithfully on the normal form. This implies that the maps into the coproduct are injective.
We demonstrate the action is faithful using the equivalence `equivPair`. We show that `G i` acts
faithfully on `Pair d i` and that `Pair d i` is isomorphic to `NormalWord d`. Here, `d` is a
`Transversal`. A `Pair d i` is a word in the coproduct, `Coprod G`, the `tail`, and an element
of the group `G i`, the `head`. The first letter of the `tail` must not be an element of `G i`.
Note that the `head` may be `1` Every letter in the `tail` must be in the transversal given by `d`.
We then show that the equivalence between `NormalWord` and `PushoutI`, between the set of normal
words and the elements of the amalgamated product. The key to this is the theorem `prod_smul_empty`,
which says that going from `NormalWord` to `PushoutI` and back is the identity. This is proven
by induction on the word using `consRecOn`.
-/
variable (φ)
/-- The data we need to pick a normal form for words in the pushout. We need to pick a
canonical element of each coset. We also need all the maps in the diagram to be injective -/
structure Transversal : Type _ where
/-- All maps in the diagram are injective -/
injective : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)
/-- The underlying set, containing exactly one element of each coset of the base group -/
set : ∀ i, Set (G i)
/-- The chosen element of the base group itself is the identity -/
one_mem : ∀ i, 1 ∈ set i
/-- We have exactly one element of each coset of the base group -/
compl : ∀ i, IsComplement (φ i).range (set i)
theorem transversal_nonempty (hφ : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)) : Nonempty (Transversal φ) := by
choose t ht using fun i => (φ i).range.exists_right_transversal 1
apply Nonempty.intro
exact
{ injective := hφ
set := t
one_mem := fun i => (ht i).2
compl := fun i => (ht i).1 }
variable {φ}
/-- The normal form for words in the pushout. Every element of the pushout is the product of an
element of the base group and a word made up of letters each of which is in the transversal. -/
structure _root_.Monoid.PushoutI.NormalWord (d : Transversal φ) extends CoprodI.Word G where
/-- Every `NormalWord` is the product of an element of the base group and a word made up
of letters each of which is in the transversal. `head` is that element of the base group. -/
head : H
/-- All letter in the word are in the transversal. -/
normalized : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ toList → g ∈ d.set i
/--
A `Pair d i` is a word in the coproduct, `Coprod G`, the `tail`, and an element of the group `G i`,
the `head`. The first letter of the `tail` must not be an element of `G i`.
Note that the `head` may be `1` Every letter in the `tail` must be in the transversal given by `d`.
Similar to `Monoid.CoprodI.Pair` except every letter must be in the transversal
(not including the head letter). -/
structure Pair (d : Transversal φ) (i : ι) extends CoprodI.Word.Pair G i where
/-- All letters in the word are in the transversal. -/
normalized : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ tail.toList → g ∈ d.set i
variable {d : Transversal φ}
/-- The empty normalized word, representing the identity element of the group. -/
@[simps!]
def empty : NormalWord d := ⟨CoprodI.Word.empty, 1, fun i g => by simp [CoprodI.Word.empty]⟩
instance : Inhabited (NormalWord d) := ⟨NormalWord.empty⟩
instance (i : ι) : Inhabited (Pair d i) :=
⟨{ (empty : NormalWord d) with
head := 1,
fstIdx_ne := fun h => by cases h }⟩
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (G i)]
@[ext]
theorem ext {w₁ w₂ : NormalWord d} (hhead : w₁.head = w₂.head)
(hlist : w₁.toList = w₂.toList) : w₁ = w₂ := by
rcases w₁ with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _, _⟩
rcases w₂ with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _, _⟩
simp_all
theorem ext_iff {w₁ w₂ : NormalWord d} : w₁ = w₂ ↔ w₁.head = w₂.head ∧ w₁.toList = w₂.toList :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h], fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ext h₁ h₂⟩
open Subgroup.IsComplement
/-- Given a word in `CoprodI`, if every letter is in the transversal and when
we multiply by an element of the base group it still has this property,
then the element of the base group we multiplied by was one. -/
theorem eq_one_of_smul_normalized (w : CoprodI.Word G) {i : ι} (h : H)
(hw : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ w.toList → g ∈ d.set i)
(hφw : ∀ j g, ⟨j, g⟩ ∈ (CoprodI.of (φ i h) • w).toList → g ∈ d.set j) :
h = 1 := by
simp only [← (d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (one_mem _)] at hw hφw
have hhead : ((d.compl i).equiv (Word.equivPair i w).head).2 =
(Word.equivPair i w).head := by
rw [Word.equivPair_head]
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with ⟨_, rfl⟩
exact hw _ _ (List.head_mem _)
· rw [equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _)]
by_contra hh1
have := hφw i (φ i h * (Word.equivPair i w).head) ?_
· apply hh1
rw [equiv_mul_left_of_mem (d.compl i) ⟨_, rfl⟩, hhead] at this
simpa [((injective_iff_map_eq_one' _).1 (d.injective i))] using this
· simp only [Word.mem_smul_iff, not_true, false_and, ne_eq, Option.mem_def, mul_right_inj,
exists_eq_right', mul_right_eq_self, exists_prop, true_and, false_or]
constructor
· intro h
apply_fun (d.compl i).equiv at h
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _),
equiv_mul_left_of_mem (d.compl i) ⟨_, rfl⟩ , hhead, Subtype.ext_iff,
Prod.ext_iff, Subgroup.coe_mul] at h
rcases h with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [h₂, equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _), mul_one,
((injective_iff_map_eq_one' _).1 (d.injective i))] at h₁
contradiction
· rw [Word.equivPair_head]
dsimp
split_ifs with hep
· rcases hep with ⟨hnil, rfl⟩
rw [head?_eq_head _ hnil]
simp_all
· push_neg at hep
by_cases hw : w.toList = []
· simp [hw, Word.fstIdx]
· simp [head?_eq_head _ hw, Word.fstIdx, hep hw]
theorem ext_smul {w₁ w₂ : NormalWord d} (i : ι)
(h : CoprodI.of (φ i w₁.head) • w₁.toWord =
CoprodI.of (φ i w₂.head) • w₂.toWord) :
w₁ = w₂ := by
rcases w₁ with ⟨w₁, h₁, hw₁⟩
rcases w₂ with ⟨w₂, h₂, hw₂⟩
dsimp at *
rw [smul_eq_iff_eq_inv_smul, ← mul_smul] at h
subst h
simp only [← map_inv, ← map_mul] at hw₁
have : h₁⁻¹ * h₂ = 1 := eq_one_of_smul_normalized w₂ (h₁⁻¹ * h₂) hw₂ hw₁
rw [inv_mul_eq_one] at this; subst this
simp
/-- A constructor that multiplies a `NormalWord` by an element, with condition to make
sure the underlying list does get longer. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def cons {i} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) : NormalWord d :=
letI n := (d.compl i).equiv (g * (φ i w.head))
letI w' := Word.cons (n.2 : G i) w.toWord hmw
(mt (coe_equiv_snd_eq_one_iff_mem _ (d.one_mem _)).1
(mt (mul_mem_cancel_right (by simp)).1 hgr))
{ toWord := w'
head := (MonoidHom.ofInjective (d.injective i)).symm n.1
normalized := fun i g hg => by
simp only [w', Word.cons, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, hg | hg⟩
· simp
· exact w.normalized _ _ (by assumption) }
/-- Given a pair `(head, tail)`, we can form a word by prepending `head` to `tail`, but
putting head into normal form first, by making sure it is expressed as an element
of the base group multiplied by an element of the transversal. -/
noncomputable def rcons (i : ι) (p : Pair d i) : NormalWord d :=
letI n := (d.compl i).equiv p.head
let w := (Word.equivPair i).symm { p.toPair with head := n.2 }
{ toWord := w
head := (MonoidHom.ofInjective (d.injective i)).symm n.1
normalized := fun i g hg => by
dsimp [w] at hg
rw [Word.equivPair_symm, Word.mem_rcons_iff] at hg
rcases hg with hg | ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact p.normalized _ _ hg
· simp }
theorem rcons_injective {i : ι} : Function.Injective (rcons (d := d) i) := by
rintro ⟨⟨head₁, tail₁⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨head₂, tail₂⟩, _⟩
simp only [rcons, NormalWord.mk.injEq, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq,
Word.Pair.mk.injEq, Pair.mk.injEq, and_imp]
intro h₁ h₂ h₃
subst h₂
rw [← equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (d.compl i) head₁,
← equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (d.compl i) head₂,
h₁, h₃]
simp
/-- The equivalence between `NormalWord`s and pairs. We can turn a `NormalWord` into a
pair by taking the head of the `List` if it is in `G i` and multiplying it by the element of the
base group. -/
noncomputable def equivPair (i) : NormalWord d ≃ Pair d i :=
letI toFun : NormalWord d → Pair d i :=
fun w =>
letI p := Word.equivPair i (CoprodI.of (φ i w.head) • w.toWord)
{ toPair := p
normalized := fun j g hg => by
dsimp only [p] at hg
rw [Word.of_smul_def, ← Word.equivPair_symm, Equiv.apply_symm_apply] at hg
dsimp at hg
exact w.normalized _ _ (Word.mem_of_mem_equivPair_tail _ hg) }
haveI leftInv : Function.LeftInverse (rcons i) toFun :=
fun w => ext_smul i <| by
simp only [rcons, Word.equivPair_symm,
Word.equivPair_smul_same, Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul, Word.rcons_eq_smul,
MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_inv,
mul_smul, inv_smul_smul, smul_inv_smul]
{ toFun := toFun
invFun := rcons i
left_inv := leftInv
right_inv := fun _ => rcons_injective (leftInv _) }
noncomputable instance summandAction (i : ι) : MulAction (G i) (NormalWord d) :=
{ smul := fun g w => (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head }
one_smul := fun _ => by
dsimp [instHSMul]
rw [one_mul]
exact (equivPair i).symm_apply_apply _
mul_smul := fun _ _ _ => by
dsimp [instHSMul]
simp [mul_assoc, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, Function.End.mul_def] }
instance baseAction : MulAction H (NormalWord d) :=
{ smul := fun h w => { w with head := h * w.head },
one_smul := by simp [instHSMul]
mul_smul := by simp [instHSMul, mul_assoc] }
theorem base_smul_def' (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
h • w = { w with head := h * w.head } := rfl
theorem summand_smul_def' {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
g • w = (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head } := rfl
noncomputable instance mulAction : MulAction (PushoutI φ) (NormalWord d) :=
MulAction.ofEndHom <|
lift
(fun i => MulAction.toEndHom)
MulAction.toEndHom <| by
intro i
simp only [MulAction.toEndHom, DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, MonoidHom.coe_mk,
OneHom.coe_mk, comp_apply]
intro h
funext w
apply NormalWord.ext_smul i
simp only [summand_smul_def', equivPair, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, Word.equivPair_smul_same, Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul,
Word.rcons_eq_smul, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, map_mul, map_inv, mul_smul, inv_smul_smul,
smul_inv_smul, base_smul_def', MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PushoutI.lean | 453 | 457 | theorem base_smul_def (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
base φ h • w = { w with head := h * w.head } := by |
dsimp [NormalWord.mulAction, instHSMul, SMul.smul]
rw [lift_base]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import number_theory.multiplicity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
_root_.map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
#align dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 46 | 48 | theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * x ^ (n - 1) := by |
rw [geom_sum₂_comm, dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub]; simpa using h.neg_right
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
#align_import data.finset.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Lattice operations on finsets
-/
-- TODO:
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function Multiset OrderDual
variable {F α β γ ι κ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### sup -/
section Sup
-- TODO: define with just `[Bot α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[OrderBot α]`
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α]
/-- Supremum of a finite set: `sup {a, b, c} f = f a ⊔ f b ⊔ f c` -/
def sup (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ f
#align finset.sup Finset.sup
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f g : β → α} {a : α}
theorem sup_def : s.sup f = (s.1.map f).sup :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_def Finset.sup_def
@[simp]
theorem sup_empty : (∅ : Finset β).sup f = ⊥ :=
fold_empty
#align finset.sup_empty Finset.sup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_cons {b : β} (h : b ∉ s) : (cons b s h).sup f = f b ⊔ s.sup f :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.sup_cons Finset.sup_cons
@[simp]
theorem sup_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} : (insert b s : Finset β).sup f = f b ⊔ s.sup f :=
fold_insert_idem
#align finset.sup_insert Finset.sup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sup_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (f : γ → β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image f).sup g = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
fold_image_idem
#align finset.sup_image Finset.sup_image
@[simp]
theorem sup_map (s : Finset γ) (f : γ ↪ β) (g : β → α) : (s.map f).sup g = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
fold_map
#align finset.sup_map Finset.sup_map
@[simp]
theorem sup_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).sup f = f b :=
Multiset.sup_singleton
#align finset.sup_singleton Finset.sup_singleton
theorem sup_sup : s.sup (f ⊔ g) = s.sup f ⊔ s.sup g := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, sup_empty, sup_empty, bot_sup_eq]
| cons _ _ _ ih =>
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, sup_cons, ih]
exact sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.sup_sup Finset.sup_sup
theorem sup_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.sup f = s₂.sup g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
#align finset.sup_congr Finset.sup_congr
@[simp]
theorem _root_.map_finset_sup [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β]
[FunLike F α β] [SupBotHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α) : f (s.sup g) = s.sup (f ∘ g) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (map_bot f) fun i s _ h => by
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, map_sup, h, Function.comp_apply]
#align map_finset_sup map_finset_sup
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_le_iff {a : α} : s.sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.sup_le
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb => k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h => h ▸ k _ hb⟩
#align finset.sup_le_iff Finset.sup_le_iff
protected alias ⟨_, sup_le⟩ := Finset.sup_le_iff
#align finset.sup_le Finset.sup_le
theorem sup_const_le : (s.sup fun _ => a) ≤ a :=
Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
#align finset.sup_const_le Finset.sup_const_le
theorem le_sup {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ≤ s.sup f :=
Finset.sup_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ hb
#align finset.le_sup Finset.le_sup
theorem le_sup_of_le {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ f b) : a ≤ s.sup f := h.trans <| le_sup hb
#align finset.le_sup_of_le Finset.le_sup_of_le
theorem sup_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).sup f = s₁.sup f ⊔ s₂.sup f :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.sup_union Finset.sup_union
@[simp]
theorem sup_biUnion [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).sup f = s.sup fun x => (t x).sup f :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp [@forall_swap _ β]
#align finset.sup_bUnion Finset.sup_biUnion
theorem sup_const {s : Finset β} (h : s.Nonempty) (c : α) : (s.sup fun _ => c) = c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff (fun _ => Finset.sup_le_iff.trans h.forall_const)
#align finset.sup_const Finset.sup_const
@[simp]
theorem sup_bot (s : Finset β) : (s.sup fun _ => ⊥) = (⊥ : α) := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact sup_empty
· exact sup_const hs _
#align finset.sup_bot Finset.sup_bot
theorem sup_ite (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.sup fun i => ite (p i) (f i) (g i)) = (s.filter p).sup f ⊔ (s.filter fun i => ¬p i).sup g :=
fold_ite _
#align finset.sup_ite Finset.sup_ite
theorem sup_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ g b) : s.sup f ≤ s.sup g :=
Finset.sup_le fun b hb => le_trans (h b hb) (le_sup hb)
#align finset.sup_mono_fun Finset.sup_mono_fun
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.sup f ≤ s₂.sup f :=
Finset.sup_le (fun _ hb => le_sup (h hb))
#align finset.sup_mono Finset.sup_mono
protected theorem sup_comm (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β → γ → α) :
(s.sup fun b => t.sup (f b)) = t.sup fun c => s.sup fun b => f b c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simpa using forall₂_swap
#align finset.sup_comm Finset.sup_comm
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS does not simplify
theorem sup_attach (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : (s.attach.sup fun x => f x) = s.sup f :=
(s.attach.sup_map (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f).symm.trans <| congr_arg _ attach_map_val
#align finset.sup_attach Finset.sup_attach
/-- See also `Finset.product_biUnion`. -/
theorem sup_product_left (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup f = s.sup fun i => t.sup fun i' => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by simp [@forall_swap _ γ]
#align finset.sup_product_left Finset.sup_product_left
theorem sup_product_right (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).sup f = t.sup fun i' => s.sup fun i => f ⟨i, i'⟩ := by
rw [sup_product_left, Finset.sup_comm]
#align finset.sup_product_right Finset.sup_product_right
section Prod
variable {ι κ α β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β]
{s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ}
@[simp] lemma sup_prodMap (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
sup (s ×ˢ t) (Prod.map f g) = (sup s f, sup t g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun i ↦ by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
simp only [Prod.map, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_product, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.le_def]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i hi ↦ (h _ _ hi hb).1, fun j hj ↦ (h _ _ ha hj).2⟩, by aesop⟩
end Prod
@[simp]
theorem sup_erase_bot [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : (s.erase ⊥).sup id = s.sup id := by
refine (sup_mono (s.erase_subset _)).antisymm (Finset.sup_le_iff.2 fun a ha => ?_)
obtain rfl | ha' := eq_or_ne a ⊥
· exact bot_le
· exact le_sup (mem_erase.2 ⟨ha', ha⟩)
#align finset.sup_erase_bot Finset.sup_erase_bot
theorem sup_sdiff_right {α β : Type*} [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → α)
(a : α) : (s.sup fun b => f b \ a) = s.sup f \ a := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, sup_empty, bot_sdiff]
| cons _ _ _ h => rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, h, sup_sdiff]
#align finset.sup_sdiff_right Finset.sup_sdiff_right
theorem comp_sup_eq_sup_comp [SemilatticeSup γ] [OrderBot γ] {s : Finset β} {f : β → α} (g : α → γ)
(g_sup : ∀ x y, g (x ⊔ y) = g x ⊔ g y) (bot : g ⊥ = ⊥) : g (s.sup f) = s.sup (g ∘ f) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s bot fun c t hc ih => by
rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, g_sup, ih, Function.comp_apply]
#align finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp
/-- Computing `sup` in a subtype (closed under `sup`) is the same as computing it in `α`. -/
theorem sup_coe {P : α → Prop} {Pbot : P ⊥} {Psup : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)} (t : Finset β)
(f : β → { x : α // P x }) :
(@sup { x // P x } _ (Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup) (Subtype.orderBot Pbot) t f : α) =
t.sup fun x => ↑(f x) := by
letI := Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup
letI := Subtype.orderBot Pbot
apply comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Subtype.val <;> intros <;> rfl
#align finset.sup_coe Finset.sup_coe
@[simp]
theorem sup_toFinset {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → Multiset β) :
(s.sup f).toFinset = s.sup fun x => (f x).toFinset :=
comp_sup_eq_sup_comp Multiset.toFinset toFinset_union rfl
#align finset.sup_to_finset Finset.sup_toFinset
theorem _root_.List.foldr_sup_eq_sup_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ = l.toFinset.sup id := by
rw [← coe_fold_r, ← Multiset.fold_dedup_idem, sup_def, ← List.toFinset_coe, toFinset_val,
Multiset.map_id]
rfl
#align list.foldr_sup_eq_sup_to_finset List.foldr_sup_eq_sup_toFinset
theorem subset_range_sup_succ (s : Finset ℕ) : s ⊆ range (s.sup id).succ := fun _ hn =>
mem_range.2 <| Nat.lt_succ_of_le <| @le_sup _ _ _ _ _ id _ hn
#align finset.subset_range_sup_succ Finset.subset_range_sup_succ
theorem exists_nat_subset_range (s : Finset ℕ) : ∃ n : ℕ, s ⊆ range n :=
⟨_, s.subset_range_sup_succ⟩
#align finset.exists_nat_subset_range Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
theorem sup_induction {p : α → Prop} (hb : p ⊥) (hp : ∀ a₁, p a₁ → ∀ a₂, p a₂ → p (a₁ ⊔ a₂))
(hs : ∀ b ∈ s, p (f b)) : p (s.sup f) := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact hb
| cons _ _ _ ih =>
simp only [sup_cons, forall_mem_cons] at hs ⊢
exact hp _ hs.1 _ (ih hs.2)
#align finset.sup_induction Finset.sup_induction
theorem sup_le_of_le_directed {α : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] (s : Set α)
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) (t : Finset α) :
(∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) → ∃ x ∈ s, t.sup id ≤ x := by
classical
induction' t using Finset.induction_on with a r _ ih h
· simpa only [forall_prop_of_true, and_true_iff, forall_prop_of_false, bot_le, not_false_iff,
sup_empty, forall_true_iff, not_mem_empty]
· intro h
have incs : (r : Set α) ⊆ ↑(insert a r) := by
rw [Finset.coe_subset]
apply Finset.subset_insert
-- x ∈ s is above the sup of r
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxs, hsx_sup⟩⟩ := ih fun x hx => h x <| incs hx
-- y ∈ s is above a
obtain ⟨y, hys, hay⟩ := h a (Finset.mem_insert_self a r)
-- z ∈ s is above x and y
obtain ⟨z, hzs, ⟨hxz, hyz⟩⟩ := hdir x hxs y hys
use z, hzs
rw [sup_insert, id, sup_le_iff]
exact ⟨le_trans hay hyz, le_trans hsx_sup hxz⟩
#align finset.sup_le_of_le_directed Finset.sup_le_of_le_directed
-- If we acquire sublattices
-- the hypotheses should be reformulated as `s : SubsemilatticeSupBot`
theorem sup_mem (s : Set α) (w₁ : ⊥ ∈ s) (w₂ : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ⊔ y ∈ s)
{ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (p : ι → α) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : t.sup p ∈ s :=
@sup_induction _ _ _ _ _ _ (· ∈ s) w₁ w₂ h
#align finset.sup_mem Finset.sup_mem
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_eq_bot_iff (f : β → α) (S : Finset β) : S.sup f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, f s = ⊥ := by
classical induction' S using Finset.induction with a S _ hi <;> simp [*]
#align finset.sup_eq_bot_iff Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff
end Sup
theorem sup_eq_iSup [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : s.sup f = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a :=
le_antisymm
(Finset.sup_le (fun a ha => le_iSup_of_le a <| le_iSup (fun _ => f a) ha))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun ha => le_sup ha)
#align finset.sup_eq_supr Finset.sup_eq_iSup
theorem sup_id_eq_sSup [CompleteLattice α] (s : Finset α) : s.sup id = sSup s := by
simp [sSup_eq_iSup, sup_eq_iSup]
#align finset.sup_id_eq_Sup Finset.sup_id_eq_sSup
theorem sup_id_set_eq_sUnion (s : Finset (Set α)) : s.sup id = ⋃₀ ↑s :=
sup_id_eq_sSup _
#align finset.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion Finset.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem sup_set_eq_biUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Set β) : s.sup f = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sup_eq_iSup _ _
#align finset.sup_set_eq_bUnion Finset.sup_set_eq_biUnion
theorem sup_eq_sSup_image [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
s.sup f = sSup (f '' s) := by
classical rw [← Finset.coe_image, ← sup_id_eq_sSup, sup_image, Function.id_comp]
#align finset.sup_eq_Sup_image Finset.sup_eq_sSup_image
/-! ### inf -/
section Inf
-- TODO: define with just `[Top α]` where some lemmas hold without requiring `[OrderTop α]`
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α]
/-- Infimum of a finite set: `inf {a, b, c} f = f a ⊓ f b ⊓ f c` -/
def inf (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold (· ⊓ ·) ⊤ f
#align finset.inf Finset.inf
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f g : β → α} {a : α}
theorem inf_def : s.inf f = (s.1.map f).inf :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_def Finset.inf_def
@[simp]
theorem inf_empty : (∅ : Finset β).inf f = ⊤ :=
fold_empty
#align finset.inf_empty Finset.inf_empty
@[simp]
theorem inf_cons {b : β} (h : b ∉ s) : (cons b s h).inf f = f b ⊓ s.inf f :=
@sup_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
#align finset.inf_cons Finset.inf_cons
@[simp]
theorem inf_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} : (insert b s : Finset β).inf f = f b ⊓ s.inf f :=
fold_insert_idem
#align finset.inf_insert Finset.inf_insert
@[simp]
theorem inf_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (f : γ → β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image f).inf g = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
fold_image_idem
#align finset.inf_image Finset.inf_image
@[simp]
theorem inf_map (s : Finset γ) (f : γ ↪ β) (g : β → α) : (s.map f).inf g = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
fold_map
#align finset.inf_map Finset.inf_map
@[simp]
theorem inf_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).inf f = f b :=
Multiset.inf_singleton
#align finset.inf_singleton Finset.inf_singleton
theorem inf_inf : s.inf (f ⊓ g) = s.inf f ⊓ s.inf g :=
@sup_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_inf Finset.inf_inf
theorem inf_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.inf f = s₂.inf g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
#align finset.inf_congr Finset.inf_congr
@[simp]
theorem _root_.map_finset_inf [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β]
[FunLike F α β] [InfTopHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α) : f (s.inf g) = s.inf (f ∘ g) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (map_top f) fun i s _ h => by
rw [inf_cons, inf_cons, map_inf, h, Function.comp_apply]
#align map_finset_inf map_finset_inf
@[simp] protected theorem le_inf_iff {a : α} : a ≤ s.inf f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ f b :=
@Finset.sup_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.le_inf_iff Finset.le_inf_iff
protected alias ⟨_, le_inf⟩ := Finset.le_inf_iff
#align finset.le_inf Finset.le_inf
theorem le_inf_const_le : a ≤ s.inf fun _ => a :=
Finset.le_inf fun _ _ => le_rfl
#align finset.le_inf_const_le Finset.le_inf_const_le
theorem inf_le {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : s.inf f ≤ f b :=
Finset.le_inf_iff.1 le_rfl _ hb
#align finset.inf_le Finset.inf_le
theorem inf_le_of_le {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) (h : f b ≤ a) : s.inf f ≤ a := (inf_le hb).trans h
#align finset.inf_le_of_le Finset.inf_le_of_le
theorem inf_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).inf f = s₁.inf f ⊓ s₂.inf f :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c ↦ by simp [or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.inf_union Finset.inf_union
@[simp] theorem inf_biUnion [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).inf f = s.inf fun x => (t x).inf f :=
@sup_biUnion αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_bUnion Finset.inf_biUnion
theorem inf_const (h : s.Nonempty) (c : α) : (s.inf fun _ => c) = c := @sup_const αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ h _
#align finset.inf_const Finset.inf_const
@[simp] theorem inf_top (s : Finset β) : (s.inf fun _ => ⊤) = (⊤ : α) := @sup_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_top Finset.inf_top
theorem inf_ite (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.inf fun i ↦ ite (p i) (f i) (g i)) = (s.filter p).inf f ⊓ (s.filter fun i ↦ ¬ p i).inf g :=
fold_ite _
theorem inf_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ g b) : s.inf f ≤ s.inf g :=
Finset.le_inf fun b hb => le_trans (inf_le hb) (h b hb)
#align finset.inf_mono_fun Finset.inf_mono_fun
@[gcongr]
theorem inf_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.inf f ≤ s₁.inf f :=
Finset.le_inf (fun _ hb => inf_le (h hb))
#align finset.inf_mono Finset.inf_mono
protected theorem inf_comm (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β → γ → α) :
(s.inf fun b => t.inf (f b)) = t.inf fun c => s.inf fun b => f b c :=
@Finset.sup_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_comm Finset.inf_comm
theorem inf_attach (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : (s.attach.inf fun x => f x) = s.inf f :=
@sup_attach αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_attach Finset.inf_attach
theorem inf_product_left (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).inf f = s.inf fun i => t.inf fun i' => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
@sup_product_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_product_left Finset.inf_product_left
theorem inf_product_right (s : Finset β) (t : Finset γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(s ×ˢ t).inf f = t.inf fun i' => s.inf fun i => f ⟨i, i'⟩ :=
@sup_product_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_product_right Finset.inf_product_right
section Prod
variable {ι κ α β : Type*} [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β]
{s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ}
@[simp] lemma inf_prodMap (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → β) :
inf (s ×ˢ t) (Prod.map f g) = (inf s f, inf t g) :=
sup_prodMap (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) hs ht _ _
end Prod
@[simp]
theorem inf_erase_top [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : (s.erase ⊤).inf id = s.inf id :=
@sup_erase_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_erase_top Finset.inf_erase_top
theorem comp_inf_eq_inf_comp [SemilatticeInf γ] [OrderTop γ] {s : Finset β} {f : β → α} (g : α → γ)
(g_inf : ∀ x y, g (x ⊓ y) = g x ⊓ g y) (top : g ⊤ = ⊤) : g (s.inf f) = s.inf (g ∘ f) :=
@comp_sup_eq_sup_comp αᵒᵈ _ γᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ g_inf top
#align finset.comp_inf_eq_inf_comp Finset.comp_inf_eq_inf_comp
/-- Computing `inf` in a subtype (closed under `inf`) is the same as computing it in `α`. -/
theorem inf_coe {P : α → Prop} {Ptop : P ⊤} {Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)} (t : Finset β)
(f : β → { x : α // P x }) :
(@inf { x // P x } _ (Subtype.semilatticeInf Pinf) (Subtype.orderTop Ptop) t f : α) =
t.inf fun x => ↑(f x) :=
@sup_coe αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ Ptop Pinf t f
#align finset.inf_coe Finset.inf_coe
theorem _root_.List.foldr_inf_eq_inf_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤ = l.toFinset.inf id := by
rw [← coe_fold_r, ← Multiset.fold_dedup_idem, inf_def, ← List.toFinset_coe, toFinset_val,
Multiset.map_id]
rfl
#align list.foldr_inf_eq_inf_to_finset List.foldr_inf_eq_inf_toFinset
theorem inf_induction {p : α → Prop} (ht : p ⊤) (hp : ∀ a₁, p a₁ → ∀ a₂, p a₂ → p (a₁ ⊓ a₂))
(hs : ∀ b ∈ s, p (f b)) : p (s.inf f) :=
@sup_induction αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ ht hp hs
#align finset.inf_induction Finset.inf_induction
theorem inf_mem (s : Set α) (w₁ : ⊤ ∈ s) (w₂ : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ⊓ y ∈ s)
{ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (p : ι → α) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : t.inf p ∈ s :=
@inf_induction _ _ _ _ _ _ (· ∈ s) w₁ w₂ h
#align finset.inf_mem Finset.inf_mem
@[simp]
protected theorem inf_eq_top_iff (f : β → α) (S : Finset β) : S.inf f = ⊤ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, f s = ⊤ :=
@Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_eq_top_iff Finset.inf_eq_top_iff
end Inf
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sup [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
toDual (s.sup f) = s.inf (toDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.to_dual_sup Finset.toDual_sup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_inf [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
toDual (s.inf f) = s.sup (toDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.to_dual_inf Finset.toDual_inf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sup [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → αᵒᵈ) :
ofDual (s.sup f) = s.inf (ofDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.of_dual_sup Finset.ofDual_sup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_inf [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] (s : Finset β) (f : β → αᵒᵈ) :
ofDual (s.inf f) = s.sup (ofDual ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align finset.of_dual_inf Finset.ofDual_inf
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α]
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α} {a : α}
theorem sup_inf_distrib_left (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
a ⊓ s.sup f = s.sup fun i => a ⊓ f i := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => simp_rw [Finset.sup_empty, inf_bot_eq]
| cons _ _ _ h => rw [sup_cons, sup_cons, inf_sup_left, h]
#align finset.sup_inf_distrib_left Finset.sup_inf_distrib_left
theorem sup_inf_distrib_right (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
s.sup f ⊓ a = s.sup fun i => f i ⊓ a := by
rw [_root_.inf_comm, s.sup_inf_distrib_left]
simp_rw [_root_.inf_comm]
#align finset.sup_inf_distrib_right Finset.sup_inf_distrib_right
protected theorem disjoint_sup_right : Disjoint a (s.sup f) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Disjoint a (f i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, sup_inf_distrib_left, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align finset.disjoint_sup_right Finset.disjoint_sup_right
protected theorem disjoint_sup_left : Disjoint (s.sup f) a ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Disjoint (f i) a := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, sup_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align finset.disjoint_sup_left Finset.disjoint_sup_left
theorem sup_inf_sup (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) :
s.sup f ⊓ t.sup g = (s ×ˢ t).sup fun i => f i.1 ⊓ g i.2 := by
simp_rw [Finset.sup_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup_inf_distrib_left, sup_product_left]
#align finset.sup_inf_sup Finset.sup_inf_sup
end OrderBot
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α] {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α} {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {a : α}
theorem inf_sup_distrib_left (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
a ⊔ s.inf f = s.inf fun i => a ⊔ f i :=
@sup_inf_distrib_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sup_distrib_left Finset.inf_sup_distrib_left
theorem inf_sup_distrib_right (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
s.inf f ⊔ a = s.inf fun i => f i ⊔ a :=
@sup_inf_distrib_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sup_distrib_right Finset.inf_sup_distrib_right
protected theorem codisjoint_inf_right :
Codisjoint a (s.inf f) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Codisjoint a (f i) :=
@Finset.disjoint_sup_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.codisjoint_inf_right Finset.codisjoint_inf_right
protected theorem codisjoint_inf_left :
Codisjoint (s.inf f) a ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Codisjoint (f i) a :=
@Finset.disjoint_sup_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.codisjoint_inf_left Finset.codisjoint_inf_left
theorem inf_sup_inf (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (f : ι → α) (g : κ → α) :
s.inf f ⊔ t.inf g = (s ×ˢ t).inf fun i => f i.1 ⊔ g i.2 :=
@sup_inf_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.inf_sup_inf Finset.inf_sup_inf
end OrderTop
section BoundedOrder
variable [BoundedOrder α] [DecidableEq ι]
--TODO: Extract out the obvious isomorphism `(insert i s).pi t ≃ t i ×ˢ s.pi t` from this proof
theorem inf_sup {κ : ι → Type*} (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i)) (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
(s.inf fun i => (t i).sup (f i)) =
(s.pi t).sup fun g => s.attach.inf fun i => f _ <| g _ i.2 := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s hi ih
· simp
rw [inf_insert, ih, attach_insert, sup_inf_sup]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
simp only [Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_product, mem_pi, and_imp, Prod.forall,
inf_insert, inf_image]
refine
⟨fun h g hg =>
h (g i <| mem_insert_self _ _) (fun j hj => g j <| mem_insert_of_mem hj)
(hg _ <| mem_insert_self _ _) fun j hj => hg _ <| mem_insert_of_mem hj,
fun h a g ha hg => ?_⟩
-- TODO: This `have` must be named to prevent it being shadowed by the internal `this` in `simpa`
have aux : ∀ j : { x // x ∈ s }, ↑j ≠ i := fun j : s => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem j.2 hi
-- Porting note: `simpa` doesn't support placeholders in proof terms
have := h (fun j hj => if hji : j = i then cast (congr_arg κ hji.symm) a
else g _ <| mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne hj hji) (fun j hj => ?_)
· simpa only [cast_eq, dif_pos, Function.comp, Subtype.coe_mk, dif_neg, aux] using this
rw [mem_insert] at hj
obtain (rfl | hj) := hj
· simpa
· simpa [ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi] using hg _ _
#align finset.inf_sup Finset.inf_sup
theorem sup_inf {κ : ι → Type*} (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i)) (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
(s.sup fun i => (t i).inf (f i)) = (s.pi t).inf fun g => s.attach.sup fun i => f _ <| g _ i.2 :=
@inf_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align finset.sup_inf Finset.sup_inf
end BoundedOrder
end DistribLattice
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] {s : Finset ι}
theorem sup_sdiff_left (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.sup fun b => a \ f b) = a \ s.inf f := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => rw [sup_empty, inf_empty, sdiff_top]
| cons _ _ _ h => rw [sup_cons, inf_cons, h, sdiff_inf]
#align finset.sup_sdiff_left Finset.sup_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_left (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.inf fun b => a \ f b) = a \ s.sup f := by
induction hs using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => rw [sup_singleton, inf_singleton]
| cons _ _ _ _ ih => rw [sup_cons, inf_cons, ih, sdiff_sup]
#align finset.inf_sdiff_left Finset.inf_sdiff_left
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Lattice.lean | 650 | 654 | theorem inf_sdiff_right (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → α) (a : α) :
(s.inf fun b => f b \ a) = s.inf f \ a := by |
induction hs using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => rw [inf_singleton, inf_singleton]
| cons _ _ _ _ ih => rw [inf_cons, inf_cons, ih, inf_sdiff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain
#align_import algebra.squarefree from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"00d163e35035c3577c1c79fa53b68de17781ffc1"
/-!
# Squarefree elements of monoids
An element of a monoid is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares
except the squares of units.
Results about squarefree natural numbers are proved in `Data.Nat.Squarefree`.
## Main Definitions
- `Squarefree r` indicates that `r` is only divisible by `x * x` if `x` is a unit.
## Main Results
- `multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one`: `x` is `Squarefree` iff for every `y`, either
`multiplicity y x ≤ 1` or `IsUnit y`.
- `UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors`: A nonzero element `x` of a unique
factorization monoid is squarefree iff `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
variable {R : Type*}
/-- An element of a monoid is squarefree if the only squares that
divide it are the squares of units. -/
def Squarefree [Monoid R] (r : R) : Prop :=
∀ x : R, x * x ∣ r → IsUnit x
#align squarefree Squarefree
theorem IsRelPrime.of_squarefree_mul [CommMonoid R] {m n : R} (h : Squarefree (m * n)) :
IsRelPrime m n := fun c hca hcb ↦ h c (mul_dvd_mul hca hcb)
@[simp]
theorem IsUnit.squarefree [CommMonoid R] {x : R} (h : IsUnit x) : Squarefree x := fun _ hdvd =>
isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left (isUnit_of_dvd_unit hdvd h)
#align is_unit.squarefree IsUnit.squarefree
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem squarefree_one [CommMonoid R] : Squarefree (1 : R) :=
isUnit_one.squarefree
#align squarefree_one squarefree_one
@[simp]
theorem not_squarefree_zero [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] : ¬Squarefree (0 : R) := by
erw [not_forall]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align not_squarefree_zero not_squarefree_zero
theorem Squarefree.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] {m : R} (hm : Squarefree (m : R)) :
m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact not_squarefree_zero hm
#align squarefree.ne_zero Squarefree.ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem Irreducible.squarefree [CommMonoid R] {x : R} (h : Irreducible x) : Squarefree x := by
rintro y ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [mul_assoc] at hz
rcases h.isUnit_or_isUnit hz with (hu | hu)
· exact hu
· apply isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left hu
#align irreducible.squarefree Irreducible.squarefree
@[simp]
theorem Prime.squarefree [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] {x : R} (h : Prime x) : Squarefree x :=
h.irreducible.squarefree
#align prime.squarefree Prime.squarefree
theorem Squarefree.of_mul_left [CommMonoid R] {m n : R} (hmn : Squarefree (m * n)) : Squarefree m :=
fun p hp => hmn p (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hp n)
#align squarefree.of_mul_left Squarefree.of_mul_left
theorem Squarefree.of_mul_right [CommMonoid R] {m n : R} (hmn : Squarefree (m * n)) :
Squarefree n := fun p hp => hmn p (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hp m)
#align squarefree.of_mul_right Squarefree.of_mul_right
theorem Squarefree.squarefree_of_dvd [CommMonoid R] {x y : R} (hdvd : x ∣ y) (hsq : Squarefree y) :
Squarefree x := fun _ h => hsq _ (h.trans hdvd)
#align squarefree.squarefree_of_dvd Squarefree.squarefree_of_dvd
theorem Squarefree.eq_zero_or_one_of_pow_of_not_isUnit [CommMonoid R] {x : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : Squarefree (x ^ n)) (h' : ¬ IsUnit x) :
n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
contrapose! h'
replace h' : 2 ≤ n := by omega
have : x * x ∣ x ^ n := by rw [← sq]; exact pow_dvd_pow x h'
exact h.squarefree_of_dvd this x (refl _)
section SquarefreeGcdOfSquarefree
variable {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α]
theorem Squarefree.gcd_right (a : α) {b : α} (hb : Squarefree b) : Squarefree (gcd a b) :=
hb.squarefree_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
#align squarefree.gcd_right Squarefree.gcd_right
theorem Squarefree.gcd_left {a : α} (b : α) (ha : Squarefree a) : Squarefree (gcd a b) :=
ha.squarefree_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
#align squarefree.gcd_left Squarefree.gcd_left
end SquarefreeGcdOfSquarefree
namespace multiplicity
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid R] [DecidableRel (Dvd.dvd : R → R → Prop)]
theorem squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one (r : R) :
Squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, multiplicity x r ≤ 1 ∨ IsUnit x := by
refine forall_congr' fun a => ?_
rw [← sq, pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, or_iff_not_imp_left, not_le, imp_congr _ Iff.rfl]
norm_cast
rw [← one_add_one_eq_two]
simpa using PartENat.add_one_le_iff_lt (PartENat.natCast_ne_top 1)
#align multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one
end CommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] [WfDvdMonoid R]
theorem finite_prime_left {a b : R} (ha : Prime a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : multiplicity.Finite a b :=
finite_of_not_isUnit ha.not_unit hb
#align multiplicity.finite_prime_left multiplicity.finite_prime_left
end CancelCommMonoidWithZero
end multiplicity
section Irreducible
variable [CommMonoidWithZero R] [WfDvdMonoid R]
theorem squarefree_iff_no_irreducibles {x : R} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) :
Squarefree x ↔ ∀ p, Irreducible p → ¬ (p * p ∣ x) := by
refine ⟨fun h p hp hp' ↦ hp.not_unit (h p hp'), fun h d hd ↦ by_contra fun hdu ↦ ?_⟩
have hd₀ : d ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero (ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hx₀ hd) (dvd_mul_left d d)
obtain ⟨p, irr, dvd⟩ := WfDvdMonoid.exists_irreducible_factor hdu hd₀
exact h p irr ((mul_dvd_mul dvd dvd).trans hd)
theorem irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree (r : R) :
(∀ x : R, Irreducible x → ¬x * x ∣ r) ↔ (r = 0 ∧ ∀ x : R, ¬Irreducible x) ∨ Squarefree r := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr)
· exact .inl (by simpa using h)
· exact .inr ((squarefree_iff_no_irreducibles hr).mpr h)
· rintro (⟨rfl, h⟩ | h)
· simpa using h
intro x hx t
exact hx.not_unit (h x t)
#align irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree
theorem squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_ne_zero {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, Irreducible x → ¬x * x ∣ r := by
simpa [hr] using (irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree r).symm
#align squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_ne_zero squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_ne_zero
theorem squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_exists_irreducible {r : R}
(hr : ∃ x : R, Irreducible x) : Squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, Irreducible x → ¬x * x ∣ r := by
rw [irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree, ← not_exists]
simp only [hr, not_true, false_or_iff, and_false_iff]
#align squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_exists_irreducible squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_exists_irreducible
end Irreducible
section IsRadical
section
variable [CommMonoidWithZero R] [DecompositionMonoid R]
theorem Squarefree.isRadical {x : R} (hx : Squarefree x) : IsRadical x :=
(isRadical_iff_pow_one_lt 2 one_lt_two).2 fun y hy ↦ by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul (sq y ▸ hy)
exact (IsRelPrime.of_squarefree_mul hx).mul_dvd ha hb
#align squarefree.is_radical Squarefree.isRadical
theorem Squarefree.dvd_pow_iff_dvd {x y : R} {n : ℕ} (hsq : Squarefree x) (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
x ∣ y ^ n ↔ x ∣ y := ⟨hsq.isRadical n y, (·.pow h0)⟩
#align unique_factorization_monoid.dvd_pow_iff_dvd_of_squarefree Squarefree.dvd_pow_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-12")]
alias UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_pow_iff_dvd_of_squarefree := Squarefree.dvd_pow_iff_dvd
end
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] {x y p d : R}
theorem IsRadical.squarefree (h0 : x ≠ 0) (h : IsRadical x) : Squarefree x := by
rintro z ⟨w, rfl⟩
specialize h 2 (z * w) ⟨w, by simp_rw [pow_two, mul_left_comm, ← mul_assoc]⟩
rwa [← one_mul (z * w), mul_assoc, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right, ← isUnit_iff_dvd_one] at h
rw [mul_assoc, mul_ne_zero_iff] at h0; exact h0.2
#align is_radical.squarefree IsRadical.squarefree
namespace Squarefree
theorem pow_dvd_of_squarefree_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_right {k : ℕ}
(hx : Squarefree x) (hp : Prime p) (h : p ^ (k + 1) ∣ x * y) :
p ^ k ∣ y := by
by_cases hxp : p ∣ x
· obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := hxp
have hx' : ¬ p ∣ x' := fun contra ↦ hp.not_unit <| hx p (mul_dvd_mul_left p contra)
replace h : p ^ k ∣ x' * y := by
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc] at h
exact (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hp.ne_zero).mp h
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _ hx' h
· exact (pow_dvd_pow _ k.le_succ).trans (hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _ hxp h)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Squarefree/Basic.lean | 222 | 226 | theorem pow_dvd_of_squarefree_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_left {k : ℕ}
(hy : Squarefree y) (hp : Prime p) (h : p ^ (k + 1) ∣ x * y) :
p ^ k ∣ x := by |
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact pow_dvd_of_squarefree_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_right hy hp h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Basic
#align_import data.real.cau_seq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9116dd6709f303dcf781632e15fdef382b0fc579"
/-!
# Cauchy sequences and big operators
This file proves some more lemmas about basic Cauchy sequences that involve finite sums.
-/
open Finset IsAbsoluteValue
namespace IsCauSeq
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α] [Ring β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{f g : ℕ → β} {a : ℕ → α}
lemma of_abv_le (n : ℕ) (hm : ∀ m, n ≤ m → abv (f m) ≤ a m) :
IsCauSeq abs (fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, a i) → IsCauSeq abv fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, f i := by
intro hg ε ε0
cases' hg (ε / 2) (div_pos ε0 (by norm_num)) with i hi
exists max n i
intro j ji
have hi₁ := hi j (le_trans (le_max_right n i) ji)
have hi₂ := hi (max n i) (le_max_right n i)
have sub_le :=
abs_sub_le (∑ k ∈ range j, a k) (∑ k ∈ range i, a k) (∑ k ∈ range (max n i), a k)
have := add_lt_add hi₁ hi₂
rw [abs_sub_comm (∑ k ∈ range (max n i), a k), add_halves ε] at this
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (le_trans ?_ (le_abs_self _)) sub_le) this
generalize hk : j - max n i = k
clear this hi₂ hi₁ hi ε0 ε hg sub_le
rw [tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le ji] at hk
rw [hk]
dsimp only
clear hk ji j
induction' k with k' hi
· simp [abv_zero abv]
simp only [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Finset.sum_range_succ_comm]
simp only [add_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg]
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) ?_
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at hi
exact add_le_add (hm _ (le_add_of_nonneg_of_le (Nat.zero_le _) (le_max_left _ _))) hi
#align is_cau_series_of_abv_le_cau IsCauSeq.of_abv_le
lemma of_abv (hf : IsCauSeq abs fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, abv (f n)) :
IsCauSeq abv fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, f n :=
hf.of_abv_le 0 fun _ _ ↦ le_rfl
#align is_cau_series_of_abv_cau IsCauSeq.of_abv
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/BigOperators.lean | 57 | 141 | theorem _root_.cauchy_product (ha : IsCauSeq abs fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, abv (f n))
(hb : IsCauSeq abv fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, g n) (ε : α) (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i : ℕ, ∀ j ≥ i,
abv ((∑ k ∈ range j, f k) * ∑ k ∈ range j, g k -
∑ n ∈ range j, ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), f m * g (n - m)) < ε := by |
let ⟨P, hP⟩ := ha.bounded
let ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := hb.bounded
have hP0 : 0 < P := lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) (hP 0)
have hPε0 : 0 < ε / (2 * P) := div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (2 : α) > 0 by norm_num) hP0)
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := hb.cauchy₂ hPε0
have hQε0 : 0 < ε / (4 * Q) :=
div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (0 : α) < 4 by norm_num) (lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0)))
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := ha.cauchy₂ hQε0
refine ⟨2 * (max N M + 1), fun K hK ↦ ?_⟩
have h₁ :
(∑ m ∈ range K, ∑ k ∈ range (m + 1), f k * g (m - k)) =
∑ m ∈ range K, ∑ n ∈ range (K - m), f m * g n := by
simpa using sum_range_diag_flip K fun m n ↦ f m * g n
have h₂ :
(fun i ↦ ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), f i * g k) = fun i ↦ f i * ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k := by
simp [Finset.mul_sum]
have h₃ :
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k =
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * (∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k) +
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * ∑ k ∈ range K, g k := by
rw [← sum_add_distrib]; simp [(mul_add _ _ _).symm]
have two_mul_two : (4 : α) = 2 * 2 := by norm_num
have hQ0 : Q ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by simp [h, lt_irrefl] at hQε0
have h2Q0 : 2 * Q ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero hQ0
have hε : ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) = ε := by
rw [← div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hP0)), two_mul_two, mul_assoc, ← div_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ h2Q0, add_halves]
have hNMK : max N M + 1 < K :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by rw [two_mul]; exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ (Nat.succ_pos _)) hK
have hKN : N < K :=
calc
N ≤ max N M := le_max_left _ _
_ < max N M + 1 := Nat.lt_succ_self _
_ < K := hNMK
have hsumlesum :
(∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) ≤
∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f i) * (ε / (2 * P)) := by
gcongr with m hmJ
refine le_of_lt $ hN (K - m) (le_tsub_of_add_le_left $ hK.trans' ?_) K hKN.le
rw [two_mul]
gcongr
· exact (mem_range.1 hmJ).le
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_left _ _)
have hsumltP : (∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)) < P :=
calc
(∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)) = |∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)| :=
Eq.symm (abs_of_nonneg (sum_nonneg fun x _ ↦ abv_nonneg abv (f x)))
_ < P := hP (max N M + 1)
rw [h₁, h₂, h₃, sum_mul, ← sub_sub, sub_right_comm, sub_self, zero_sub, abv_neg abv]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _) ?_
suffices
(∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) +
((∑ i ∈ range K, abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) -
∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) <
ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) by
rw [hε] at this
simpa [abv_mul abv] using this
gcongr
· exact lt_of_le_of_lt hsumlesum
(by rw [← sum_mul, mul_comm]; gcongr)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK)]
calc
(∑ i ∈ (range K).filter fun k ↦ max N M + 1 ≤ k,
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) ≤
∑ i ∈ (range K).filter fun k ↦ max N M + 1 ≤ k, abv (f i) * (2 * Q) := by
gcongr
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) ?_
rw [two_mul, abv_neg abv]
gcongr <;> exact le_of_lt (hQ _)
_ < ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) := by
rw [← sum_mul, ← sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK)]
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0)
gcongr
exact (le_abs_self _).trans_lt $ hM _ ((Nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_right _ _)).trans hNMK.le)
_ $ Nat.le_succ_of_le $ le_max_right _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jakob Scholbach. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob Scholbach
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Algebra
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
#align_import algebra.char_p.exp_char from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Exponential characteristic
This file defines the exponential characteristic, which is defined to be 1 for a ring with
characteristic 0 and the same as the ordinary characteristic, if the ordinary characteristic is
prime. This concept is useful to simplify some theorem statements.
This file establishes a few basic results relating it to the (ordinary characteristic).
The definition is stated for a semiring, but the actual results are for nontrivial rings
(as far as exponential characteristic one is concerned), respectively a ring without zero-divisors
(for prime characteristic).
## Main results
- `ExpChar`: the definition of exponential characteristic
- `expChar_is_prime_or_one`: the exponential characteristic is a prime or one
- `char_eq_expChar_iff`: the characteristic equals the exponential characteristic iff the
characteristic is prime
## Tags
exponential characteristic, characteristic
-/
universe u
variable (R : Type u)
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- The definition of the exponential characteristic of a semiring. -/
class inductive ExpChar (R : Type u) [Semiring R] : ℕ → Prop
| zero [CharZero R] : ExpChar R 1
| prime {q : ℕ} (hprime : q.Prime) [hchar : CharP R q] : ExpChar R q
#align exp_char ExpChar
#align exp_char.prime ExpChar.prime
instance expChar_prime (p) [CharP R p] [Fact p.Prime] : ExpChar R p := ExpChar.prime Fact.out
instance expChar_zero [CharZero R] : ExpChar R 1 := ExpChar.zero
instance (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (p) [ExpChar R p] [ExpChar S p] : ExpChar (R × S) p := by
obtain hp | ⟨hp⟩ := ‹ExpChar R p›
· have := Prod.charZero_of_left R S; exact .zero
obtain _ | _ := ‹ExpChar S p›
· exact (Nat.not_prime_one hp).elim
· have := Prod.charP R S p; exact .prime hp
variable {R} in
/-- The exponential characteristic is unique. -/
theorem ExpChar.eq {p q : ℕ} (hp : ExpChar R p) (hq : ExpChar R q) : p = q := by
cases' hp with hp _ hp' hp
· cases' hq with hq _ hq' hq
exacts [rfl, False.elim (Nat.not_prime_zero (CharP.eq R hq (CharP.ofCharZero R) ▸ hq'))]
· cases' hq with hq _ hq' hq
exacts [False.elim (Nat.not_prime_zero (CharP.eq R hp (CharP.ofCharZero R) ▸ hp')),
CharP.eq R hp hq]
theorem ExpChar.congr {p : ℕ} (q : ℕ) [hq : ExpChar R q] (h : q = p) : ExpChar R p := h ▸ hq
/-- Noncomputable function that outputs the unique exponential characteristic of a semiring. -/
noncomputable def ringExpChar (R : Type*) [NonAssocSemiring R] : ℕ := max (ringChar R) 1
theorem ringExpChar.eq (q : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R q] : ringExpChar R = q := by
cases' h with _ _ h _
· haveI := CharP.ofCharZero R
rw [ringExpChar, ringChar.eq R 0]; rfl
rw [ringExpChar, ringChar.eq R q]
exact Nat.max_eq_left h.one_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem ringExpChar.eq_one (R : Type*) [NonAssocSemiring R] [CharZero R] : ringExpChar R = 1 := by
rw [ringExpChar, ringChar.eq_zero, max_eq_right zero_le_one]
/-- The exponential characteristic is one if the characteristic is zero. -/
theorem expChar_one_of_char_zero (q : ℕ) [hp : CharP R 0] [hq : ExpChar R q] : q = 1 := by
cases' hq with q hq_one hq_prime hq_hchar
· rfl
· exact False.elim <| hq_prime.ne_zero <| hq_hchar.eq R hp
#align exp_char_one_of_char_zero expChar_one_of_char_zero
/-- The characteristic equals the exponential characteristic iff the former is prime. -/
theorem char_eq_expChar_iff (p q : ℕ) [hp : CharP R p] [hq : ExpChar R q] : p = q ↔ p.Prime := by
cases' hq with q hq_one hq_prime hq_hchar
· rw [(CharP.eq R hp inferInstance : p = 0)]
decide
· exact ⟨fun hpq => hpq.symm ▸ hq_prime, fun _ => CharP.eq R hp hq_hchar⟩
#align char_eq_exp_char_iff char_eq_expChar_iff
section Nontrivial
variable [Nontrivial R]
/-- The exponential characteristic is one if the characteristic is zero. -/
theorem char_zero_of_expChar_one (p : ℕ) [hp : CharP R p] [hq : ExpChar R 1] : p = 0 := by
cases hq
· exact CharP.eq R hp inferInstance
· exact False.elim (CharP.char_ne_one R 1 rfl)
#align char_zero_of_exp_char_one char_zero_of_expChar_one
-- This could be an instance, but there are no `ExpChar R 1` instances in mathlib.
/-- The characteristic is zero if the exponential characteristic is one. -/
theorem charZero_of_expChar_one' [hq : ExpChar R 1] : CharZero R := by
cases hq
· assumption
· exact False.elim (CharP.char_ne_one R 1 rfl)
#align char_zero_of_exp_char_one' charZero_of_expChar_one'
/-- The exponential characteristic is one iff the characteristic is zero. -/
theorem expChar_one_iff_char_zero (p q : ℕ) [CharP R p] [ExpChar R q] : q = 1 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact char_zero_of_expChar_one R p
· rintro rfl
exact expChar_one_of_char_zero R q
#align exp_char_one_iff_char_zero expChar_one_iff_char_zero
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
/-- A helper lemma: the characteristic is prime if it is non-zero. -/
theorem char_prime_of_ne_zero {p : ℕ} [hp : CharP R p] (p_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) : Nat.Prime p := by
cases' CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero R p with h h
· exact h
· contradiction
#align char_prime_of_ne_zero char_prime_of_ne_zero
/-- The exponential characteristic is a prime number or one.
See also `CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero`. -/
theorem expChar_is_prime_or_one (q : ℕ) [hq : ExpChar R q] : Nat.Prime q ∨ q = 1 := by
cases hq with
| zero => exact .inr rfl
| prime hp => exact .inl hp
#align exp_char_is_prime_or_one expChar_is_prime_or_one
/-- The exponential characteristic is positive. -/
theorem expChar_pos (q : ℕ) [ExpChar R q] : 0 < q := by
rcases expChar_is_prime_or_one R q with h | rfl
exacts [Nat.Prime.pos h, Nat.one_pos]
/-- Any power of the exponential characteristic is positive. -/
theorem expChar_pow_pos (q : ℕ) [ExpChar R q] (n : ℕ) : 0 < q ^ n :=
Nat.pos_pow_of_pos n (expChar_pos R q)
end NoZeroDivisors
end Nontrivial
end Semiring
theorem ExpChar.exists [Ring R] [IsDomain R] : ∃ q, ExpChar R q := by
obtain _ | ⟨p, ⟨hp⟩, _⟩ := CharP.exists' R
exacts [⟨1, .zero⟩, ⟨p, .prime hp⟩]
theorem ExpChar.exists_unique [Ring R] [IsDomain R] : ∃! q, ExpChar R q :=
let ⟨q, H⟩ := ExpChar.exists R
⟨q, H, fun _ H2 ↦ ExpChar.eq H2 H⟩
instance ringExpChar.expChar [Ring R] [IsDomain R] : ExpChar R (ringExpChar R) := by
obtain ⟨q, _⟩ := ExpChar.exists R
rwa [ringExpChar.eq R q]
variable {R} in
theorem ringExpChar.of_eq [Ring R] [IsDomain R] {q : ℕ} (h : ringExpChar R = q) : ExpChar R q :=
h ▸ ringExpChar.expChar R
variable {R} in
theorem ringExpChar.eq_iff [Ring R] [IsDomain R] {q : ℕ} : ringExpChar R = q ↔ ExpChar R q :=
⟨ringExpChar.of_eq, fun _ ↦ ringExpChar.eq R q⟩
/-- If a ring homomorphism `R →+* A` is injective then `A` has the same exponential characteristic
as `R`. -/
theorem expChar_of_injective_ringHom {R A : Type*}
[Semiring R] [Semiring A] {f : R →+* A} (h : Function.Injective f)
(q : ℕ) [hR : ExpChar R q] : ExpChar A q := by
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· haveI := charZero_of_injective_ringHom h; exact .zero
haveI := charP_of_injective_ringHom h q; exact .prime hprime
/-- If `R →+* A` is injective, and `A` is of exponential characteristic `p`, then `R` is also of
exponential characteristic `p`. Similar to `RingHom.charZero`. -/
theorem RingHom.expChar {R A : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring A] (f : R →+* A)
(H : Function.Injective f) (p : ℕ) [ExpChar A p] : ExpChar R p := by
cases ‹ExpChar A p› with
| zero => haveI := f.charZero; exact .zero
| prime hp => haveI := f.charP H p; exact .prime hp
/-- If `R →+* A` is injective, then `R` is of exponential characteristic `p` if and only if `A` is
also of exponential characteristic `p`. Similar to `RingHom.charZero_iff`. -/
theorem RingHom.expChar_iff {R A : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring A] (f : R →+* A)
(H : Function.Injective f) (p : ℕ) : ExpChar R p ↔ ExpChar A p :=
⟨fun _ ↦ expChar_of_injective_ringHom H p, fun _ ↦ f.expChar H p⟩
/-- If the algebra map `R →+* A` is injective then `A` has the same exponential characteristic
as `R`. -/
theorem expChar_of_injective_algebraMap {R A : Type*}
[CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (h : Function.Injective (algebraMap R A))
(q : ℕ) [ExpChar R q] : ExpChar A q := expChar_of_injective_ringHom h q
theorem add_pow_expChar_of_commute [Semiring R] {q : ℕ} [hR : ExpChar R q]
(x y : R) (h : Commute x y) : (x + y) ^ q = x ^ q + y ^ q := by
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [pow_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime; exact add_pow_char_of_commute R x y h
theorem add_pow_expChar_pow_of_commute [Semiring R] {q : ℕ} [hR : ExpChar R q]
{n : ℕ} (x y : R) (h : Commute x y) : (x + y) ^ q ^ n = x ^ q ^ n + y ^ q ^ n := by
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [one_pow, pow_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime; exact add_pow_char_pow_of_commute R x y h
theorem sub_pow_expChar_of_commute [Ring R] {q : ℕ} [hR : ExpChar R q]
(x y : R) (h : Commute x y) : (x - y) ^ q = x ^ q - y ^ q := by
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [pow_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime; exact sub_pow_char_of_commute R x y h
theorem sub_pow_expChar_pow_of_commute [Ring R] {q : ℕ} [hR : ExpChar R q]
{n : ℕ} (x y : R) (h : Commute x y) : (x - y) ^ q ^ n = x ^ q ^ n - y ^ q ^ n := by
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [one_pow, pow_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime; exact sub_pow_char_pow_of_commute R x y h
theorem add_pow_expChar [CommSemiring R] {q : ℕ} [hR : ExpChar R q]
(x y : R) : (x + y) ^ q = x ^ q + y ^ q := by
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [pow_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime; exact add_pow_char R x y
theorem add_pow_expChar_pow [CommSemiring R] {q : ℕ} [hR : ExpChar R q]
{n : ℕ} (x y : R) : (x + y) ^ q ^ n = x ^ q ^ n + y ^ q ^ n := by
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [one_pow, pow_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime; exact add_pow_char_pow R x y
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/ExpChar.lean | 247 | 251 | theorem sub_pow_expChar [CommRing R] {q : ℕ} [hR : ExpChar R q]
(x y : R) : (x - y) ^ q = x ^ q - y ^ q := by |
cases' hR with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [pow_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime; exact sub_pow_char R x y
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Equivalences between polynomial rings
This file establishes a number of equivalences between polynomial rings,
based on equivalences between the underlying types.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
## Tags
equivalence, isomorphism, morphism, ring hom, hom
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section Equiv
variable (R) [CommSemiring R]
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a single variable and
polynomials over the ground ring.
-/
@[simps]
def pUnitAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial PUnit R ≃ₐ[R] R[X] where
toFun := eval₂ Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
invFun := Polynomial.eval₂ MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
left_inv := by
let f : R[X] →+* MvPolynomial PUnit R := Polynomial.eval₂RingHom MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
let g : MvPolynomial PUnit R →+* R[X] := eval₂Hom Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
show ∀ p, f.comp g p = p
apply is_id
· ext a
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_C, Polynomial.eval₂_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_X]
right_inv p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun a => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_C, MvPolynomial.eval₂_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_add, MvPolynomial.eval₂_add, hp, hq]) fun p n _ => by
rw [Polynomial.eval₂_mul, Polynomial.eval₂_pow, Polynomial.eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_C,
eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_pow, eval₂_X]
map_mul' _ _ := eval₂_mul _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
commutes' _ := eval₂_C _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.punit_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv
section Map
variable {R} (σ)
/-- If `e : A ≃+* B` is an isomorphism of rings, then so is `map e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapEquiv [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂) :
MvPolynomial σ S₁ ≃+* MvPolynomial σ S₂ :=
{ map (e : S₁ →+* S₂) with
toFun := map (e : S₁ →+* S₂)
invFun := map (e.symm : S₂ →+* S₁)
left_inv := map_leftInverse e.left_inv
right_inv := map_rightInverse e.right_inv }
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv MvPolynomial.mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv σ (RingEquiv.refl R) = RingEquiv.refl _ :=
RingEquiv.ext map_id
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv_refl MvPolynomial.mapEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂) :
(mapEquiv σ e).symm = mapEquiv σ e.symm :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv_symm MvPolynomial.mapEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_trans [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] [CommSemiring S₃] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂)
(f : S₂ ≃+* S₃) : (mapEquiv σ e).trans (mapEquiv σ f) = mapEquiv σ (e.trans f) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun p => by
simp only [RingEquiv.coe_trans, comp_apply, mapEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.coe_ringHom_trans,
map_map]
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv_trans MvPolynomial.mapEquiv_trans
variable {A₁ A₂ A₃ : Type*} [CommSemiring A₁] [CommSemiring A₂] [CommSemiring A₃]
variable [Algebra R A₁] [Algebra R A₂] [Algebra R A₃]
/-- If `e : A ≃ₐ[R] B` is an isomorphism of `R`-algebras, then so is `map e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapAlgEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : MvPolynomial σ A₁ ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ A₂ :=
{ mapAlgHom (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂), mapEquiv σ (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) with toFun := map (e : A₁ →+* A₂) }
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_refl : mapAlgEquiv σ (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext map_id
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv_refl MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : (mapAlgEquiv σ e).symm = mapAlgEquiv σ e.symm :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv_symm MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_trans (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(mapAlgEquiv σ e).trans (mapAlgEquiv σ f) = mapAlgEquiv σ (e.trans f) := by
ext
simp only [AlgEquiv.trans_apply, mapAlgEquiv_apply, map_map]
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv_trans MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv_trans
end Map
section
variable (S₁ S₂ S₃)
/-- The function from multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
to multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
See `sumRingEquiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def sumToIter : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R →+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
eval₂Hom (C.comp C) fun bc => Sum.recOn bc X (C ∘ X)
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter MvPolynomial.sumToIter
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_C (a : R) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (C a) = C (C a) :=
eval₂_C _ _ a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_C MvPolynomial.sumToIter_C
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xl (b : S₁) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inl b)) = X b :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inl b)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_Xl MvPolynomial.sumToIter_Xl
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xr (c : S₂) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inr c)) = C (X c) :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inr c)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_Xr MvPolynomial.sumToIter_Xr
/-- The function from multivariable polynomials in one type,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in another type,
to multivariable polynomials in the sum of the two types.
See `sumRingEquiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def iterToSum : MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) →+* MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R :=
eval₂Hom (eval₂Hom C (X ∘ Sum.inr)) (X ∘ Sum.inl)
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum MvPolynomial.iterToSum
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_C (a : R) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (C a)) = C a :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (C a)) (eval₂_C _ _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_C_C MvPolynomial.iterToSum_C_C
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_X (b : S₁) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (X b) = X (Sum.inl b) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_X MvPolynomial.iterToSum_X
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_X (c : S₂) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (X c)) = X (Sum.inr c) :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (X c)) (eval₂_X _ _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_C_X MvPolynomial.iterToSum_C_X
variable (σ)
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables
and the ground ring. -/
@[simps!]
def isEmptyAlgEquiv [he : IsEmpty σ] : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] R :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (aeval (IsEmpty.elim he)) (Algebra.ofId _ _)
(by ext)
(by
ext i m
exact IsEmpty.elim' he i)
#align mv_polynomial.is_empty_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.isEmptyAlgEquiv
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables
and the ground ring. -/
@[simps!]
def isEmptyRingEquiv [IsEmpty σ] : MvPolynomial σ R ≃+* R :=
(isEmptyAlgEquiv R σ).toRingEquiv
#align mv_polynomial.is_empty_ring_equiv MvPolynomial.isEmptyRingEquiv
variable {σ}
/-- A helper function for `sumRingEquiv`. -/
@[simps]
def mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial [CommSemiring S₃] (f : MvPolynomial S₁ R →+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃)
(g : MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ →+* MvPolynomial S₁ R) (hfgC : (f.comp g).comp C = C)
(hfgX : ∀ n, f (g (X n)) = X n) (hgfC : (g.comp f).comp C = C) (hgfX : ∀ n, g (f (X n)) = X n) :
MvPolynomial S₁ R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hgfC hgfX
right_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hfgC hfgX
map_mul' := f.map_mul
map_add' := f.map_add
#align mv_polynomial.mv_polynomial_equiv_mv_polynomial MvPolynomial.mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
and multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
-/
def sumRingEquiv : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) := by
apply mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial R (Sum S₁ S₂) _ _ (sumToIter R S₁ S₂) (iterToSum R S₁ S₂)
· refine RingHom.ext (hom_eq_hom _ _ ?hC ?hX)
case hC => ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_C, sumToIter_C]
case hX => intro; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_X, sumToIter_Xr]
· simp [iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xl]
· ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, sumToIter_C, iterToSum_C_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [sumToIter_Xl, iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xr, iterToSum_C_X]
#align mv_polynomial.sum_ring_equiv MvPolynomial.sumRingEquiv
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
and multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
-/
@[simps!]
def sumAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
{ sumRingEquiv R S₁ S₂ with
commutes' := by
intro r
have A : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R)) r = (C (C r) : _) := rfl
have B : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R) r = C r := rfl
simp only [sumRingEquiv, mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial, Equiv.toFun_as_coe,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, B, sumToIter_C, A] }
#align mv_polynomial.sum_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv
section
-- this speeds up typeclass search in the lemma below
attribute [local instance] IsScalarTower.right
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Option S₁` and
polynomials with coefficients in `MvPolynomial S₁ R`.
-/
@[simps!]
def optionEquivLeft : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial S₁ R) :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim Polynomial.X fun s => Polynomial.C (X s))
(Polynomial.aevalTower (MvPolynomial.rename some) (X none))
(by ext : 2 <;> simp) (by ext i : 2; cases i <;> simp)
#align mv_polynomial.option_equiv_left MvPolynomial.optionEquivLeft
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X (some x)) = Polynomial.C (X x) := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_none : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X none) = Polynomial.X := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_C (r : R) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (C r) = Polynomial.C (C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, Polynomial.algebraMap_apply, algebraMap_eq]
end
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Option S₁` and
multivariable polynomials with coefficients in polynomials.
-/
@[simps!]
def optionEquivRight : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ R[X] :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim (C Polynomial.X) X)
(MvPolynomial.aevalTower (Polynomial.aeval (X none)) fun i => X (Option.some i))
(by
ext : 2 <;>
simp only [MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq, Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, AlgHom.id_comp,
IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', comp_apply, aevalTower_C, Polynomial.aeval_X, aeval_X,
Option.elim', aevalTower_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff])
(by
ext ⟨i⟩ : 2 <;>
simp only [Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, comp_apply, aeval_X, aevalTower_C,
Polynomial.aeval_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, aevalTower_X])
#align mv_polynomial.option_equiv_right MvPolynomial.optionEquivRight
lemma optionEquivRight_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X (some x)) = X x := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_X_none : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X none) = C Polynomial.X := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_C (r : R) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (C r) = C (Polynomial.C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_C, algebraMap_apply, Polynomial.algebraMap_eq]
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Fin (n + 1)` and
polynomials over multivariable polynomials in `Fin n`.
-/
def finSuccEquiv : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) :=
(renameEquiv R (_root_.finSuccEquiv n)).trans (optionEquivLeft R (Fin n))
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv
theorem finSuccEquiv_eq :
(finSuccEquiv R n : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R →+* Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) fun i : Fin (n + 1) =>
Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i := by
ext i : 2
· simp only [finSuccEquiv, optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, AlgEquiv.coe_trans, RingHom.coe_coe,
coe_eval₂Hom, comp_apply, renameEquiv_apply, eval₂_C, RingHom.coe_comp, rename_C]
rfl
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [finSuccEquiv]
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_eq MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_eq
@[simp]
theorem finSuccEquiv_apply (p : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) :
finSuccEquiv R n p =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R))
(fun i : Fin (n + 1) => Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i) p := by
rw [← finSuccEquiv_eq, RingHom.coe_coe]
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_apply MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_apply
theorem finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) :
(↑(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).symm : Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) →+* _).comp
(Polynomial.C.comp MvPolynomial.C) =
(MvPolynomial.C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n.succ) R) := by
refine RingHom.ext fun x => ?_
rw [RingHom.comp_apply]
refine
(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).injective
(Trans.trans ((MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).apply_symm_apply _) ?_)
simp only [MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_apply, MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_comp_C_eq_C MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C
variable {n} {R}
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Equiv.lean | 373 | 373 | theorem finSuccEquiv_X_zero : finSuccEquiv R n (X 0) = Polynomial.X := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetToL1
#align_import measure_theory.integral.bochner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `SetToL1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal * x`.
`weightedSMul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `DominatedFinMeasAdditive`
(defined in the file `SetToL1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `SimpleFunc α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `SimpleFunc.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simpleFunc α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simpleFunc.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `ContinuousLinearMap.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `setToFun` (which are described in the
file `SetToL1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` :
`∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. (In the file `DominatedConvergence`)
`tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `SetIntegral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm`
* `LinearIsometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `Integrable.induction` in the file `SimpleFuncDenseLp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` for a complicated example, which proves
that `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part`
is scattered in sections with the name `posPart`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal <| ‖f a‖)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `isClosed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `isClosed_property` or `DenseRange.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/Integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`MeasureTheory/LpSpace`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/SimpleFuncDense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`MeasureTheory/SetIntegral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Differentiable
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section WeightedSMul
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `fun x => (μ s).toReal • x`. The extension
of that set function through `setToL1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).toReal • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) (x : F) :
weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal • x := by simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_apply MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} :
weightedSMul (0 : Measure α) = (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1; simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_zero_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_empty {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
weightedSMul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_empty MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_empty
theorem weightedSMul_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weightedSMul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul ν s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
rw [Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.toReal_add hμs hνs, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_add_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_add_measure
theorem weightedSMul_smul_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} :
(weightedSMul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.toReal • weightedSMul μ s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, smul_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul_measure
theorem weightedSMul_congr (s t : Set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr 2
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_congr MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_congr
theorem weightedSMul_null {s : Set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 := by
ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply, h_zero]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_null MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_null
theorem weightedSMul_union' (s t : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [add_apply, weightedSMul_apply,
measure_union (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ENNReal.toReal_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union' MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union'
@[nolint unusedArguments]
theorem weightedSMul_union (s t : Set α) (_hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t :=
weightedSMul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union
theorem weightedSMul_smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (c : 𝕜)
(s : Set α) (x : F) : weightedSMul μ s (c • x) = c • weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul
theorem norm_weightedSMul_le (s : Set α) : ‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal :=
calc
‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ = ‖(μ s).toReal‖ * ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F‖ :=
norm_smul (μ s).toReal (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F)
_ ≤ ‖(μ s).toReal‖ :=
((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le)
_ = abs (μ s).toReal := Real.norm_eq_abs _
_ = (μ s).toReal := abs_eq_self.mpr ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.norm_weighted_smul_le MeasureTheory.norm_weightedSMul_le
theorem dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul μ : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weightedSMul_union, fun s _ _ => (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul MeasureTheory.dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_nonneg (s : Set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp only [weightedSMul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', _root_.id, coe_id', Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_nonneg toReal_nonneg hx
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_nonneg
end WeightedSMul
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section PosPart
variable [LinearOrder E] [Zero E] [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- Positive part of a simple function. -/
def posPart (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
f.map fun b => max b 0
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function. -/
def negPart [Neg E] (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart
theorem posPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (posPart f).map norm = posPart f := by
ext; rw [map_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]; exact le_max_right _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm
theorem negPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (negPart f).map norm = negPart f := by
rw [negPart]; exact posPart_map_norm _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm
theorem posPart_sub_negPart (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : f.posPart - f.negPart = f := by
simp only [posPart, negPart]
ext a
rw [coe_sub]
exact max_zero_sub_eq_self (f a)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_sub_neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_sub_negPart
end PosPart
section Integral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of simple functions
Define the Bochner integral of simple functions of the type `α →ₛ β` where `β` is a normed group,
and prove basic property of this integral.
-/
open Finset
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {G F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α}
/-- Bochner integral of simple functions whose codomain is a real `NormedSpace`.
This is equal to `∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x` (see `integral_eq`). -/
def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) : F :=
f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_def MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_def
theorem integral_eq {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
simp [integral, setToSimpleFunc, weightedSMul_apply]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_sum_filter [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [integral_def, setToSimpleFunc_eq_sum_filter]; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_filter MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter
/-- The Bochner integral is equal to a sum over any set that includes `f.range` (except `0`). -/
theorem integral_eq_sum_of_subset [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {f : α →ₛ F} {s : Finset F}
(hs : (f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ s) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter, Finset.sum_subset hs]
rintro x - hx; rw [Finset.mem_filter, not_and_or, Ne, Classical.not_not] at hx
-- Porting note: reordered for clarity
rcases hx.symm with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range] at hx
-- Porting note: added
simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists] at hx
rw [preimage_eq_empty] <;> simp [Set.disjoint_singleton_left, hx]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_of_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem integral_const {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (y : F) :
(const α y).integral μ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by
classical
calc
(const α y).integral μ = ∑ z ∈ {y}, (μ (const α y ⁻¹' {z})).toReal • z :=
integral_eq_sum_of_subset <| (filter_subset _ _).trans (range_const_subset _ _)
_ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by simp [Set.preimage] -- Porting note: added `Set.preimage`
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_piecewise_zero {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (piecewise s hs f 0).integral μ = f.integral (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
refine (integral_eq_sum_of_subset ?_).trans
((sum_congr rfl fun y hy => ?_).trans (integral_eq_sum_filter _ _).symm)
· intro y hy
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator,
mem_range_indicator] at *
rcases hy with ⟨⟨rfl, -⟩ | ⟨x, -, rfl⟩, h₀⟩
exacts [(h₀ rfl).elim, ⟨Set.mem_range_self _, h₀⟩]
· dsimp
rw [Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem,
Measure.restrict_apply (f.measurableSet_preimage _)]
exact fun h₀ => (mem_filter.1 hy).2 (Eq.symm h₀)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_piecewise_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_piecewise_zero
/-- Calculate the integral of `g ∘ f : α →ₛ F`, where `f` is an integrable function from `α` to `E`
and `g` is a function from `E` to `F`. We require `g 0 = 0` so that `g ∘ f` is integrable. -/
theorem map_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (g : E → F) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
(f.map g).integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • g x :=
map_setToSimpleFunc _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_integral
/-- `SimpleFunc.integral` and `SimpleFunc.lintegral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion.
See `integral_eq_lintegral` for a simpler version. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral' {f : α →ₛ E} {g : E → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg0 : g 0 = 0)
(ht : ∀ b, g b ≠ ∞) :
(f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ g)).integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ) := by
have hf' : f.FinMeasSupp μ := integrable_iff_finMeasSupp.1 hf
simp only [← map_apply g f, lintegral_eq_lintegral]
rw [map_integral f _ hf, map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => ?_
-- Porting note: added `Function.comp_apply`
rw [smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, mul_comm, Function.comp_apply]
· rintro a -
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· rw [a0, hg0, zero_mul]; exact WithTop.zero_ne_top
· apply mul_ne_top (ht a) (hf'.meas_preimage_singleton_ne_zero a0).ne
· simp [hg0]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral'
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem integral_congr {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f.integral μ = g.integral μ :=
setToSimpleFunc_congr (weightedSMul μ) (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union hf h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
/-- `SimpleFunc.bintegral` and `SimpleFunc.integral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →ₛ ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
f.integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ ENNReal.ofReal) :=
h_pos.mono fun a h => (ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h).symm
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral' hf]
exacts [integral_congr hf this, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, fun b => ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_add {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f + g) = integral μ f + integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_add _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_neg {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) : integral μ (-f) = -integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_neg _ weightedSMul_union hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_neg MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_neg
theorem integral_sub {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f - g) = integral μ f - integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_sub _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_sub MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_sub
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
integral μ (c • f) = c • integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_smul _ weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal) {f : α →ₛ E}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * (f.map norm).integral μ :=
calc
‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) * ‖x‖ :=
norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm f hf
_ = C * (f.map norm).integral μ := by
rw [map_integral f norm hf norm_zero]; simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_set_to_simple_func_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖f.integral μ‖ ≤ (f.map norm).integral μ := by
refine (norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm _ (fun s _ _ => ?_) hf).trans (one_mul _).le
exact (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_integral_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
theorem integral_add_measure {ν} (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
f.integral (μ + ν) = f.integral μ + f.integral ν := by
simp_rw [integral_def]
refine setToSimpleFunc_add_left'
(weightedSMul μ) (weightedSMul ν) (weightedSMul (μ + ν)) (fun s _ hμνs => ?_) hf
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.add_ne_top] at hμνs
rw [weightedSMul_add_measure _ _ hμνs.1 hμνs.2]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add_measure
end Integral
end SimpleFunc
namespace L1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `L1`
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖f‖ = ((toSimpleFunc f).map norm).integral μ := by
rw [norm_eq_sum_mul f, (toSimpleFunc f).map_integral norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f) norm_zero]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_eq_integral
section PosPart
/-- Positive part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
nonrec def posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
⟨Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ), by
rcases f with ⟨f, s, hsf⟩
use s.posPart
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Lp.coe_posPart, ← hsf, AEEqFun.posPart_mk,
SimpleFunc.coe_map, mk_eq_mk]
-- Porting note: added
simp [SimpleFunc.posPart, Function.comp, EventuallyEq.rfl] ⟩
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
def negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (posPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_posPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (negPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.negPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_negPart
end PosPart
section SimpleFuncIntegral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of `L1`
Define the Bochner integral on `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` by extension from the simple functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`,
and prove basic properties of this integral. -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] {F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space. -/
def integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : E :=
(toSimpleFunc f).integral μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral
nonrec theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ} (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc f) :
integral f = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((toSimpleFunc f) a) ∂μ) := by
rw [integral, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h_pos]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_eq_setToL1S (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = setToL1S (weightedSMul μ) f := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_set_to_L1s MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_setToL1S
nonrec theorem integral_congr {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
integral f = integral g :=
SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g :=
setToL1S_add _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union _ _
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f :=
setToL1S_smul _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_integral_le_norm (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := by
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral]
exact (toSimpleFunc f).norm_integral_le_integral_norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_integral_le_norm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_norm
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
def integralCLM' : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous ⟨⟨integral, integral_add⟩, integral_smul⟩ 1 fun f =>
le_trans (norm_integral_le_norm _) <| by rw [one_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM'
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' α E ℝ μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
local notation "Integral" => integralCLM α E μ
open ContinuousLinearMap
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖Integral‖ ≤ 1 :=
-- Porting note: Old proof was `LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _`
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one (fun f => by
rw [one_mul]
exact norm_integral_le_norm f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_Integral_le_one
section PosPart
theorem posPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (posPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).posPart := by
have eq : ∀ a, (toSimpleFunc f).posPart a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := fun a => rfl
have ae_eq : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, toSimpleFunc (posPart f) a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (posPart f), Lp.coeFn_posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ),
toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f] with _ _ h₂ h₃
convert h₂ using 1
-- Porting note: added
rw [h₃]
refine ae_eq.mono fun a h => ?_
rw [h, eq]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem negPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (negPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).negPart := by
rw [SimpleFunc.negPart, MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart]
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc (-f), neg_toSimpleFunc f]
intro a h₁ h₂
rw [h₁]
show max _ _ = max _ _
rw [h₂]
rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : integral f = ‖posPart f‖ - ‖negPart f‖ := by
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₁ : (toSimpleFunc f).posPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₂ : (toSimpleFunc f).negPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [negPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral, norm_eq_integral, ← SimpleFunc.integral_sub]
· show (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ =
((toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm - (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm).integral μ
apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
filter_upwards [ae_eq₁, ae_eq₂] with _ h₁ h₂
show _ = _ - _
rw [← h₁, ← h₂]
have := (toSimpleFunc f).posPart_sub_negPart
conv_lhs => rw [← this]
rfl
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).pos_part.congr ae_eq₁
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).neg_part.congr ae_eq₂
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end SimpleFuncIntegral
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ _ _ _ μ _
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace E]
section IntegrationInL1
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable (𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
nonrec def integralCLM' : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
(integralCLM' α E 𝕜 μ).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.uniformInducing
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM'
variable {𝕜}
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' ℝ
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM
-- Porting note: added `(E := E)` in several places below.
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space -/
irreducible_def integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : E :=
integralCLM (E := E) f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral
theorem integral_eq (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral f = integralCLM (E := E) f := by
simp only [integral]
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToL1 (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
integral f = setToL1 (E := E) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_set_to_L1 MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_setToL1
@[norm_cast]
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
L1.integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) = SimpleFunc.integral f := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral]
exact setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_L1_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral
variable (α E)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : integral (0 : α →₁[μ] E) = 0 := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_zero integralCLM
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_zero MeasureTheory.L1.integral_zero
variable {α E}
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_add integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.integral_add
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (-f) = -integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_neg integralCLM f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_neg MeasureTheory.L1.integral_neg
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_sub (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f - g) = integral f - integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_sub integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_sub
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f := by
simp only [integral]
show (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) (c • f) = c • (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) f
exact map_smul (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) c f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.integral_smul
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ μ _ _
local notation "sIntegral" => @SimpleFunc.integralCLM α E _ _ μ _
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ ≤ 1 :=
norm_setToL1_le (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) zero_le_one
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one
theorem nnnorm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_Integral_le_one
theorem norm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖integral f‖ = ‖integralCLM (E := E) f‖ := by simp only [integral]
_ ≤ ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ * ‖f‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ 1 * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right norm_Integral_le_one <| norm_nonneg _
_ = ‖f‖ := one_mul _
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_integral_le MeasureTheory.L1.norm_integral_le
theorem nnnorm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ :=
norm_integral_le f
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact L1.integralCLM.continuous
#align measure_theory.L1.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.L1.continuous_integral
section PosPart
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) :
integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖ := by
-- Use `isClosed_property` and `isClosed_eq`
refine @isClosed_property _ _ _ ((↑) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) → α →₁[μ] ℝ)
(fun f : α →₁[μ] ℝ => integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) (isClosed_eq ?_ ?_) ?_ f
· simp only [integral]
exact cont _
· refine Continuous.sub (continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_posPart)
(continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_negPart)
-- Show that the property holds for all simple functions in the `L¹` space.
· intro s
norm_cast
exact SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end IntegrationInL1
end L1
/-!
## The Bochner integral on functions
Define the Bochner integral on functions generally to be the `L1` Bochner integral, for integrable
functions, and 0 otherwise; prove its basic properties.
-/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [hE : CompleteSpace E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
{G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section
open scoped Classical
/-- The Bochner integral -/
irreducible_def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → G) : G :=
if _ : CompleteSpace G then
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.integral MeasureTheory.integral
end
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => integral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => integral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
section Properties
open ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
variable {f g : α → E} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem integral_eq (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) := by
simp [integral, hE, hf]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq MeasureTheory.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToFun (f : α → E) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = setToFun μ (weightedSMul μ) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral, hE, L1.integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_set_to_fun MeasureTheory.integral_eq_setToFun
theorem L1.integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : L1.integral f = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral, integral_eq_setToFun]
exact (L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_integral
theorem integral_undef {f : α → G} (h : ¬Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp [integral, hG, h]
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_undef MeasureTheory.integral_undef
theorem Integrable.of_integral_ne_zero {f : α → G} (h : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≠ 0) : Integrable f μ :=
Not.imp_symm integral_undef h
theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → G} (h : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_undef <| not_and_of_not_left _ h
#align measure_theory.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
variable (α G)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : ∫ _ : α, (0 : G) ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_zero (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_zero MeasureTheory.integral_zero
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero' : integral μ (0 : α → G) = 0 :=
integral_zero α G
#align measure_theory.integral_zero' MeasureTheory.integral_zero'
variable {α G}
theorem integrable_of_integral_eq_one {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1) : Integrable f μ :=
.of_integral_ne_zero <| h ▸ one_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one MeasureTheory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one
theorem integral_add {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_add (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_add MeasureTheory.integral_add
theorem integral_add' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f + g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_add hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_add' MeasureTheory.integral_add'
theorem integral_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → G} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
∫ a, ∑ i ∈ s, f i a ∂μ = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ a, f i a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_finset_sum (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) s hf
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.integral_finset_sum
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α → G) : ∫ a, -f a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_neg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_neg MeasureTheory.integral_neg
theorem integral_neg' (f : α → G) : ∫ a, (-f) a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
#align measure_theory.integral_neg' MeasureTheory.integral_neg'
theorem integral_sub {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_sub (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_sub MeasureTheory.integral_sub
theorem integral_sub' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f - g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_sub hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_sub' MeasureTheory.integral_sub'
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 G] (c : 𝕜) (f : α → G) :
∫ a, c • f a ∂μ = c • ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_smul (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) weightedSMul_smul c f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_smul MeasureTheory.integral_smul
theorem integral_mul_left {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_smul r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_left MeasureTheory.integral_mul_left
theorem integral_mul_right {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by
simp only [mul_comm]; exact integral_mul_left r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_right MeasureTheory.integral_mul_right
theorem integral_div {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a / r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) / r := by
simpa only [← div_eq_mul_inv] using integral_mul_right r⁻¹ f
#align measure_theory.integral_div MeasureTheory.integral_div
theorem integral_congr_ae {f g : α → G} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_congr_ae (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) h
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.integral_congr_ae
-- Porting note: `nolint simpNF` added because simplify fails on left-hand side
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, (hf.toL1 f) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [MeasureTheory.integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_toL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf
· simp [MeasureTheory.integral, hG]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G => ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.continuous_integral
theorem norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm (f : α → G) :
‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq f hf, ← Integrable.norm_toL1_eq_lintegral_norm f hf]
exact L1.norm_integral_le _
· rw [integral_undef hf, norm_zero]; exact toReal_nonneg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm
theorem ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm (f : α → G) :
(‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
exact norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm f
#align measure_theory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm MeasureTheory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_ae {f : α → G} (hf : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
simp [integral_congr_ae hf, integral_zero]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G}
(hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_zero, NNReal.tendsto_coe, ← ENNReal.tendsto_coe,
ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_set_lintegral_zero (ne_of_lt hf) hs) (fun i => zero_le _)
fun i => ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `f` is integrable, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ)
{l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) :=
hf.2.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero hs
#align measure_theory.integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias Integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ)
(hF : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f hfi hFi hF
· simp [integral, hG, tendsto_const_nhds]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_of_L1 MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_integral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi.restrict ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [hFi] with i hi using hi.restrict
· simp_rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm] at hF ⊢
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds hF (fun _ ↦ zero_le')
(fun _ ↦ snorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1 := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_ s
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1' := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1'
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => F x a) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousWithinAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_within_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousWithinAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousAt (fun x => F x a) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousOn_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousOn (fun x => F x a) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousOn_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousOn_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_on_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousOn_of_dominated
theorem continuous_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ) (h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ) (h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Continuous fun x => F x a) :
Continuous fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuous_of_dominated
/-- The Bochner integral of a real-valued function `f : α → ℝ` is the difference between the
integral of the positive part of `f` and the integral of the negative part of `f`. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ =
ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (f a) ∂μ) - ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) := by
let f₁ := hf.toL1 f
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₁ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.posPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_posPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (le_max_right _ _)]
rw [Real.coe_toNNReal', NNReal.coe_mk]
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₂ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.negPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_negPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_neg]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _), ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
rw [eq₁, eq₂, integral, dif_pos, dif_pos]
exact L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part hfi]
have h_min : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· refine hf.mono ?_
simp only [Pi.zero_apply]
intro a h
simp only [h, neg_nonpos, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfm.aemeasurable.neg
rw [h_min, zero_toReal, _root_.sub_zero]
· rw [integral_undef hfi]
simp_rw [Integrable, hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, true_and_iff,
Classical.not_not] at hfi
have : ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae (hf.mono fun a h => ?_)
dsimp only
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h]
rw [this, hfi]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hf.norm]
· simp_rw [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
· filter_upwards; simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
#align measure_theory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.aestronglyMeasurable,
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hf.2)]
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (f a) : ℝ) ∂μ - ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (-f a) : ℝ) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_sub hf.real_toNNReal]
· simp
· exact hf.neg.real_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part
theorem integral_nonneg_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : CompleteSpace ℝ := by infer_instance
simp only [integral_def, A, L1.integral_def, dite_true, ge_iff_le]
exact setToFun_nonneg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
(fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_nonneg s) hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg_of_ae
theorem lintegral_coe_eq_integral (f : α → ℝ≥0) (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => (f x).coe_nonneg)
hfi.aestronglyMeasurable, ← ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]
convert hfi.hasFiniteIntegral
-- Porting note: `convert` no longer unfolds `HasFiniteIntegral`
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, NNReal.nnnorm_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral
theorem ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, f x ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] (‖f ·‖) := f_nn.mono fun _x hx ↦ (abs_of_nonneg hx).symm
simp_rw [integral_congr_ae this, ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hfi,
← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (this.symm.fun_comp ENNReal.ofReal)
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_eq_lintegral_of_real MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal
theorem integral_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
∫ a, (f a).toReal ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ).toReal := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hfm.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable,
lintegral_congr_ae (ofReal_toReal_ae_eq hf)]
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.integral_to_real MeasureTheory.integral_toReal
theorem lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ)
{b : ℝ≥0} : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b ↔ ∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral f hfi, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.coe_le_coe,
Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le
theorem integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} {b : ℝ≥0} (h : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b) :
∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun a => (f a : ℝ)) μ
· exact (lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le hf).1 h
· rw [integral_undef hf]; exact b.2
#align measure_theory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le MeasureTheory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le
theorem integral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg
theorem integral_nonpos_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 := by
have hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] -f := hf.mono fun a h => by rwa [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.zero_apply, neg_nonneg]
have : 0 ≤ ∫ a, -f a ∂μ := integral_nonneg_of_ae hf
rwa [integral_neg, neg_nonneg] at this
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos_of_ae
theorem integral_nonpos {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
integral_nonpos_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff,
← ENNReal.not_lt_top, ← hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf, hfi.2, not_true_eq_false, or_false_iff]
-- Porting note: split into parts, to make `rw` and `simp` work
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· rw [← hf.le_iff_eq, Filter.EventuallyEq, Filter.EventuallyLE]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact (ENNReal.measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfi.1.aemeasurable)
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
lemma integral_eq_iff_of_ae_le {f g : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h_le ↦ EventuallyEq.symm ?_, fun h ↦ integral_congr_ae h⟩
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero,
← integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae ((sub_nonneg_ae _ _).mpr hfg) (hg.sub hf)]
simpa [Pi.sub_apply, integral_sub hg hf, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp_rw [(integral_nonneg_of_ae hf).lt_iff_ne, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, @eq_comm ℝ 0,
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Pi.zero_apply,
Function.support]
#align measure_theory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) :=
integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg
lemma integral_exp_pos {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ} [hμ : NeZero μ]
(hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ Real.exp (f x)) μ) :
0 < ∫ x, Real.exp (f x) ∂μ := by
rw [integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg (fun x ↦ (Real.exp_pos _).le) hf]
suffices (Function.support fun x ↦ Real.exp (f x)) = Set.univ by simp [this, hμ.out]
ext1 x
simp only [Function.mem_support, ne_eq, (Real.exp_pos _).ne', not_false_eq_true, Set.mem_univ]
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for real-valued functions and Bochner integrals -/
lemma integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF : Integrable F μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
-- switch from the Bochner to the Lebesgue integral
let f' := fun n x ↦ f n x - f 0 x
have hf'_nonneg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, 0 ≤ f' n x := by
filter_upwards [h_mono] with a ha n
simp [f', ha (zero_le n)]
have hf'_meas : ∀ n, Integrable (f' n) μ := fun n ↦ (hf n).sub (hf 0)
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f' n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, (F - f 0) x ∂μ)) by
simp_rw [integral_sub (hf _) (hf _), integral_sub' hF (hf 0), tendsto_sub_const_iff] at this
exact this
have hF_ge : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ (F - f 0) x := by
filter_upwards [h_tendsto, h_mono] with x hx_tendsto hx_mono
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_nonneg]
exact ge_of_tendsto' hx_tendsto (fun n ↦ hx_mono (zero_le _))
rw [ae_all_iff] at hf'_nonneg
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (hf'_nonneg _) (hf'_meas _).1]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hF_ge (hF.1.sub (hf 0).1)]
have h_cont := ENNReal.continuousAt_toReal (x := ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((F - f 0) a) ∂μ) ?_
swap
· rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (hF.sub (hf 0)) hF_ge]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
refine h_cont.tendsto.comp ?_
-- use the result for the Lebesgue integral
refine lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun n ↦ ((hf n).sub (hf 0)).aemeasurable.ennreal_ofReal
· filter_upwards [h_mono] with x hx n m hnm
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp only [f', tsub_le_iff_right, sub_add_cancel]
exact hx hnm
· filter_upwards [h_tendsto] with x hx
refine (ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp ?_
simp only [Pi.sub_apply]
exact Tendsto.sub hx tendsto_const_nhds
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for real-valued functions and Bochner integrals -/
lemma integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF : Integrable F μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, -f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, -F x ∂μ)) by
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, - -f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, - -F x ∂μ)) by
simpa [neg_neg] using this
convert this.neg <;> rw [integral_neg]
refine integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone (fun n ↦ (hf n).neg) hF.neg ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [h_mono] with x hx n m hnm using neg_le_neg_iff.mpr <| hx hnm
· filter_upwards [h_tendsto] with x hx using hx.neg
/-- If a monotone sequence of functions has an upper bound and the sequence of integrals of these
functions tends to the integral of the upper bound, then the sequence of functions converges
almost everywhere to the upper bound. -/
lemma tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_monotone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf_int : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF_int : Integrable F μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ a, f i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ a, F a ∂μ)))
(hf_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Monotone (fun i ↦ f i a))
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, f i a ≤ F a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f i a) atTop (𝓝 (F a)) := by
-- reduce to the `ℝ≥0∞` case
let f' : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun n a ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (f n a - f 0 a)
let F' : α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun a ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (F a - f 0 a)
have hf'_int_eq : ∀ i, ∫⁻ a, f' i a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f i a ∂μ - ∫ a, f 0 a ∂μ) := by
intro i
unfold_let f'
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal, integral_sub (hf_int i) (hf_int 0)]
· exact (hf_int i).sub (hf_int 0)
· filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a h_mono
simp [h_mono (zero_le i)]
have hF'_int_eq : ∫⁻ a, F' a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, F a ∂μ - ∫ a, f 0 a ∂μ) := by
unfold_let F'
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal, integral_sub hF_int (hf_int 0)]
· exact hF_int.sub (hf_int 0)
· filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a h_bound
simp [h_bound 0]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ a, f' i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, F' a ∂μ)) := by
simp_rw [hf'_int_eq, hF'_int_eq]
refine (ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp ?_
rwa [tendsto_sub_const_iff]
have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Monotone (fun i ↦ f' i a) := by
filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a ha_mono i j hij
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp [ha_mono hij]
have h_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, f' i a ≤ F' a := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a ha_bound i
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp only [tsub_le_iff_right, sub_add_cancel, ha_bound i]
-- use the corresponding lemma for `ℝ≥0∞`
have h := tendsto_of_lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone ?_ h_tendsto h_mono h_bound ?_
rotate_left
· exact (hF_int.1.aemeasurable.sub (hf_int 0).1.aemeasurable).ennreal_ofReal
· exact ((lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm _).trans_lt (hF_int.sub (hf_int 0)).2).ne
filter_upwards [h, hf_mono, hf_bound] with a ha ha_mono ha_bound
have h1 : (fun i ↦ f i a) = fun i ↦ (f' i a).toReal + f 0 a := by
unfold_let f'
ext i
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
· abel
· simp [ha_mono (zero_le i)]
have h2 : F a = (F' a).toReal + f 0 a := by
unfold_let F'
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
· abel
· simp [ha_bound 0]
rw [h1, h2]
refine Filter.Tendsto.add ?_ tendsto_const_nhds
exact (ENNReal.continuousAt_toReal ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top).tendsto.comp ha
/-- If an antitone sequence of functions has a lower bound and the sequence of integrals of these
functions tends to the integral of the lower bound, then the sequence of functions converges
almost everywhere to the lower bound. -/
lemma tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_antitone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf_int : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF_int : Integrable F μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ a, f i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ a, F a ∂μ)))
(hf_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a))
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, F a ≤ f i a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f i a) atTop (𝓝 (F a)) := by
let f' : ℕ → α → ℝ := fun i a ↦ - f i a
let F' : α → ℝ := fun a ↦ - F a
suffices ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f' i a) atTop (𝓝 (F' a)) by
filter_upwards [this] with a ha_tendsto
convert ha_tendsto.neg
· simp [f']
· simp [F']
refine tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_monotone (fun n ↦ (hf_int n).neg) hF_int.neg ?_ ?_ ?_
· convert hf_tendsto.neg
· rw [integral_neg]
· rw [integral_neg]
· filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a ha i j hij
simp [f', ha hij]
· filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a ha i
simp [f', F', ha i]
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H]
theorem L1.norm_eq_integral_norm (f : α →₁[μ] H) : ‖f‖ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
simp only [snorm, snorm', ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_one, Lp.norm_def, if_false,
ENNReal.one_ne_top, one_ne_zero, _root_.div_one]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall (by simp [norm_nonneg]))
(Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).norm]
simp [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_eq_integral_norm MeasureTheory.L1.norm_eq_integral_norm
theorem L1.dist_eq_integral_dist (f g : α →₁[μ] H) : dist f g = ∫ a, dist (f a) (g a) ∂μ := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm, L1.norm_eq_integral_norm]
exact integral_congr_ae <| (Lp.coeFn_sub _ _).fun_comp norm
theorem L1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm {f : α → H} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖hf.toL1 f‖ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
rw [L1.norm_eq_integral_norm]
exact integral_congr_ae <| hf.coeFn_toL1.fun_comp _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm MeasureTheory.L1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm
theorem Memℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm {f : α → H} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp1 : p ≠ 0) (hp2 : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
snorm f p μ = ENNReal.ofReal ((∫ a, ‖f a‖ ^ p.toReal ∂μ) ^ p.toReal⁻¹) := by
have A : ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal (‖f a‖ ^ p.toReal) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a : α, ‖f a‖₊ ^ p.toReal ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
simp only [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp1 hp2, one_div]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]; rotate_left
· exact ae_of_all _ fun x => by positivity
· exact (hf.aestronglyMeasurable.norm.aemeasurable.pow_const _).aestronglyMeasurable
rw [A, ← ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg toReal_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 toReal_nonneg), ofReal_toReal]
exact (lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp1 hp2 hf.2).ne
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm
end NormedAddCommGroup
theorem integral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (h : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
have A : CompleteSpace ℝ := by infer_instance
simp only [integral, A, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_mono (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
(fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_nonneg s) hf hg h
#align measure_theory.integral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.integral_mono_ae
@[mono]
theorem integral_mono {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (h : f ≤ g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_mono_ae hf hg <| eventually_of_forall h
#align measure_theory.integral_mono MeasureTheory.integral_mono
theorem integral_mono_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hgi : Integrable g μ)
(h : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ
· refine integral_mono_ae ⟨hfm, ?_⟩ hgi h
refine hgi.hasFiniteIntegral.mono <| h.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hfg => ?_
simpa [abs_of_nonneg hf, abs_of_nonneg (le_trans hf hfg)]
· rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hfm]
exact integral_nonneg_of_ae (hf.trans h)
#align measure_theory.integral_mono_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_mono_of_nonneg
theorem integral_mono_measure {f : α → ℝ} {ν} (hle : μ ≤ ν) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[ν] f)
(hfi : Integrable f ν) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂ν := by
have hfi' : Integrable f μ := hfi.mono_measure hle
have hf' : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := hle.absolutelyContinuous hf
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf' hfi'.1, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal]
exacts [lintegral_mono' hle le_rfl, ((hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf').1 hfi'.2).ne,
((hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf).1 hfi.2).ne]
#align measure_theory.integral_mono_measure MeasureTheory.integral_mono_measure
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α → G) : ‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
have le_ae : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, 0 ≤ ‖f a‖ := eventually_of_forall fun a => norm_nonneg _
by_cases h : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ
· calc
‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) :=
norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm _
_ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := (integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae le_ae <| h.norm).symm
· rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable h, norm_zero]
exact integral_nonneg_of_ae le_ae
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le {f : α → G} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) : ‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ :=
calc
‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm f
_ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ := integral_mono_of_nonneg (eventually_of_forall fun _ => norm_nonneg _) hg h
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
f.integral μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.integral_eq f hfi, ← L1.SimpleFunc.toLp_one_eq_toL1,
L1.SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral, L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral]
exact SimpleFunc.integral_congr hfi (Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_toLp _ _).symm
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum (f : α →ₛ E) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • x := by
rw [← f.integral_eq_integral hfi, SimpleFunc.integral, ← SimpleFunc.integral_eq]; rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum
@[simp]
theorem integral_const (c : E) : ∫ _ : α, c ∂μ = (μ univ).toReal • c := by
cases' (@le_top _ _ _ (μ univ)).lt_or_eq with hμ hμ
· haveI : IsFiniteMeasure μ := ⟨hμ⟩
simp only [integral, hE, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_const (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) _
· by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp [hc, integral_zero]
· have : ¬Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ := by
simp only [integrable_const_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨hc, hμ.not_lt⟩
simp [integral_undef, *]
#align measure_theory.integral_const MeasureTheory.integral_const
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → G} {C : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : ‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ C * (μ univ).toReal :=
calc
‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ _, C ∂μ := norm_integral_le_of_norm_le (integrable_const C) h
_ = C * (μ univ).toReal := by rw [integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const
theorem tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E}
{s : Set E} [SeparableSpace s] (hfi : Integrable f μ) (hfm : Measurable f)
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) (h₀i : Integrable (fun _ => y₀) μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => (SimpleFunc.approxOn f hfm s y₀ h₀ n).integral μ)
atTop (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
have hfi' := SimpleFunc.integrable_approxOn hfm hfi h₀ h₀i
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (hfi' _), integral, hE, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hfi hfm hs h₀ h₀i
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable
theorem tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
{f : α → E} (fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) (s : Set E) [SeparableSpace s]
(hs : range f ∪ {0} ⊆ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => (SimpleFunc.approxOn f fmeas s 0 (hs <| by simp) n).integral μ) atTop
(𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
apply tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable hf fmeas _ _ (integrable_zero _ _ _)
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => subset_closure (hs (Set.mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)))
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable_of_range_subset MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset
theorem tendsto_integral_norm_approxOn_sub [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E}
(fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) [SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, ‖SimpleFunc.approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n x - f x‖ ∂μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert (tendsto_toReal zero_ne_top).comp (tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_nnnorm fmeas hf) with n
rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
· simp
· apply (SimpleFunc.aestronglyMeasurable _).sub
apply (stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨fmeas, ?_⟩ ).aestronglyMeasurable
exact .mono (.of_subtype (range f ∪ {0})) subset_union_left
variable {ν : Measure α}
theorem integral_add_measure {f : α → G} (hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
∫ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) = ∫ x, f x ∂μ + ∫ x, f x ∂ν := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
have hfi := hμ.add_measure hν
simp_rw [integral_eq_setToFun]
have hμ_dfma : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + ν) (weightedSMul μ : Set α → G →L[ℝ] G) 1 :=
DominatedFinMeasAdditive.add_measure_right μ ν (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
zero_le_one
have hν_dfma : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + ν) (weightedSMul ν : Set α → G →L[ℝ] G) 1 :=
DominatedFinMeasAdditive.add_measure_left μ ν (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul ν)
zero_le_one
rw [← setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_right hμ_dfma
(dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f hfi,
← setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_left hν_dfma (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul ν) f hfi]
refine setToFun_add_left' _ _ _ (fun s _ hμνs => ?_) f
rw [Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_lt_top] at hμνs
rw [weightedSMul, weightedSMul, weightedSMul, ← add_smul, Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
toReal_add hμνs.1.ne hμνs.2.ne]
#align measure_theory.integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.integral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → G) :
(∫ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_measure_zero (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) rfl
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.integral_zero_measure
theorem integral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → G} {μ : ι → Measure α}
{s : Finset ι} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable f (μ i)) :
∫ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ a, f a ∂μ i := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction_on with
| h₁ => simp
| h₂ h ih =>
rw [Finset.forall_mem_cons] at hf
rw [Finset.sum_cons, Finset.sum_cons, ← ih hf.2]
exact integral_add_measure hf.1 (integrable_finset_sum_measure.2 hf.2)
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.integral_finset_sum_measure
theorem nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral
{f : α → G} (h₁ : Integrable f μ) (h₂ : Integrable f ν) :
(nndist (∫ x, f x ∂μ) (∫ x, f x ∂(μ + ν)) : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂ν := by
rw [integral_add_measure h₁ h₂, nndist_comm, nndist_eq_nnnorm, add_sub_cancel_left]
exact ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral
theorem hasSum_integral_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → G} {μ : ι → Measure α}
(hf : Integrable f (Measure.sum μ)) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) := by
have hfi : ∀ i, Integrable f (μ i) := fun i => hf.mono_measure (Measure.le_sum _ _)
simp only [HasSum, ← integral_finset_sum_measure fun i _ => hfi i]
refine Metric.nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff.mpr fun ε ε0 => ?_
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le
have hf_lt : (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂Measure.sum μ) < ∞ := hf.2
have hmem : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂Measure.sum μ), (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂Measure.sum μ) < y + ε := by
refine tendsto_id.add tendsto_const_nhds (lt_mem_nhds (α := ℝ≥0∞) <| ENNReal.lt_add_right ?_ ?_)
exacts [hf_lt.ne, ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 (NNReal.coe_ne_zero.1 ε0.ne')]
refine ((hasSum_lintegral_measure (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) μ).eventually hmem).mono fun s hs => ?_
obtain ⟨ν, hν⟩ : ∃ ν, (∑ i ∈ s, μ i) + ν = Measure.sum μ := by
refine ⟨Measure.sum fun i : ↥(sᶜ : Set ι) => μ i, ?_⟩
simpa only [← Measure.sum_coe_finset] using Measure.sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) μ
rw [Metric.mem_ball, ← coe_nndist, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← hν]
rw [← hν, integrable_add_measure] at hf
refine (nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral hf.1 hf.2).trans_lt ?_
rw [← hν, lintegral_add_measure, lintegral_finset_sum_measure] at hs
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left hs
#align measure_theory.has_sum_integral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_integral_measure
theorem integral_sum_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → G} {μ : ι → Measure α}
(hf : Integrable f (Measure.sum μ)) : ∫ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫ a, f a ∂μ i :=
(hasSum_integral_measure hf).tsum_eq.symm
#align measure_theory.integral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.integral_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem integral_smul_measure (f : α → G) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫ x, f x ∂c • μ = c.toReal • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
-- First we consider the “degenerate” case `c = ∞`
rcases eq_or_ne c ∞ with (rfl | hc)
· rw [ENNReal.top_toReal, zero_smul, integral_eq_setToFun, setToFun_top_smul_measure]
-- Main case: `c ≠ ∞`
simp_rw [integral_eq_setToFun, ← setToFun_smul_left]
have hdfma : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul (c • μ) : Set α → G →L[ℝ] G) c.toReal :=
mul_one c.toReal ▸ (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul (c • μ)).of_smul_measure c hc
have hdfma_smul := dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul (F := G) (c • μ)
rw [← setToFun_congr_smul_measure c hc hdfma hdfma_smul f]
exact setToFun_congr_left' _ _ (fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_smul_measure μ c) f
#align measure_theory.integral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.integral_smul_measure
@[simp]
theorem integral_smul_nnreal_measure (f : α → G) (c : ℝ≥0) :
∫ x, f x ∂(c • μ) = c • ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
integral_smul_measure f (c : ℝ≥0∞)
theorem integral_map_of_stronglyMeasurable {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : Measurable φ)
{f : β → G} (hfm : StronglyMeasurable f) : ∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
by_cases hfi : Integrable f (Measure.map φ μ); swap
· rw [integral_undef hfi, integral_undef]
exact fun hfφ => hfi ((integrable_map_measure hfm.aestronglyMeasurable hφ.aemeasurable).2 hfφ)
borelize G
have : SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set G) := hfm.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
refine tendsto_nhds_unique
(tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset hfm.measurable hfi _ Subset.rfl) ?_
convert tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset (hfm.measurable.comp hφ)
((integrable_map_measure hfm.aestronglyMeasurable hφ.aemeasurable).1 hfi) (range f ∪ {0})
(by simp [insert_subset_insert, Set.range_comp_subset_range]) using 1
ext1 i
simp only [SimpleFunc.approxOn_comp, SimpleFunc.integral_eq, Measure.map_apply, hφ,
SimpleFunc.measurableSet_preimage, ← preimage_comp, SimpleFunc.coe_comp]
refine (Finset.sum_subset (SimpleFunc.range_comp_subset_range _ hφ) fun y _ hy => ?_).symm
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range, ← Set.preimage_singleton_eq_empty, SimpleFunc.coe_comp] at hy
rw [hy]
simp
#align measure_theory.integral_map_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.integral_map_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem integral_map {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : AEMeasurable φ μ) {f : β → G}
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f (Measure.map φ μ)) :
∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ :=
let g := hfm.mk f
calc
∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ y, g y ∂Measure.map φ μ := integral_congr_ae hfm.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫ y, g y ∂Measure.map (hφ.mk φ) μ := by congr 1; exact Measure.map_congr hφ.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫ x, g (hφ.mk φ x) ∂μ :=
(integral_map_of_stronglyMeasurable hφ.measurable_mk hfm.stronglyMeasurable_mk)
_ = ∫ x, g (φ x) ∂μ := integral_congr_ae (hφ.ae_eq_mk.symm.fun_comp _)
_ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ := integral_congr_ae <| ae_eq_comp hφ hfm.ae_eq_mk.symm
#align measure_theory.integral_map MeasureTheory.integral_map
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integral_map {β} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) (g : β → G) : ∫ y, g y ∂Measure.map f μ = ∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ)
· exact MeasureTheory.integral_map hf.measurable.aemeasurable hgm
· rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hgm, integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable]
exact fun hgf => hgm (hf.aestronglyMeasurable_map_iff.2 hgf)
#align measurable_embedding.integral_map MeasurableEmbedding.integral_map
theorem _root_.ClosedEmbedding.integral_map {β} [TopologicalSpace α] [BorelSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : ClosedEmbedding φ)
(f : β → G) : ∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ :=
hφ.measurableEmbedding.integral_map _
#align closed_embedding.integral_map ClosedEmbedding.integral_map
theorem integral_map_equiv {β} [MeasurableSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (f : β → G) :
∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map e μ = ∫ x, f (e x) ∂μ :=
e.measurableEmbedding.integral_map f
#align measure_theory.integral_map_equiv MeasureTheory.integral_map_equiv
theorem MeasurePreserving.integral_comp {β} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding f) (g : β → G) :
∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ = ∫ y, g y ∂ν :=
h₁.map_eq ▸ (h₂.integral_map g).symm
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.integral_comp MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.integral_comp
theorem MeasurePreserving.integral_comp' {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν} {f : α ≃ᵐ β}
(h : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) (g : β → G) :
∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ = ∫ y, g y ∂ν := MeasurePreserving.integral_comp h f.measurableEmbedding _
theorem integral_subtype_comap {α} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → G) :
∫ x : s, f (x : α) ∂(Measure.comap Subtype.val μ) = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs]
exact ((MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integral_map _).symm
attribute [local instance] Measure.Subtype.measureSpace in
theorem integral_subtype {α} [MeasureSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → G) :
∫ x : s, f x = ∫ x in s, f x := integral_subtype_comap hs f
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_subtype MeasureTheory.integral_subtype
@[simp]
theorem integral_dirac' [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → E) (a : α) (hfm : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = f a := by
borelize E
calc
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = ∫ _, f a ∂Measure.dirac a :=
integral_congr_ae <| ae_eq_dirac' hfm.measurable
_ = f a := by simp [Measure.dirac_apply_of_mem]
#align measure_theory.integral_dirac' MeasureTheory.integral_dirac'
@[simp]
theorem integral_dirac [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → E) (a : α) :
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = f a :=
calc
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = ∫ _, f a ∂Measure.dirac a := integral_congr_ae <| ae_eq_dirac f
_ = f a := by simp [Measure.dirac_apply_of_mem]
#align measure_theory.integral_dirac MeasureTheory.integral_dirac
theorem setIntegral_dirac' {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (a : α)
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
∫ x in s, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = if a ∈ s then f a else 0 := by
rw [restrict_dirac' hs]
split_ifs
· exact integral_dirac' _ _ hf
· exact integral_zero_measure _
#align measure_theory.set_integral_dirac' MeasureTheory.setIntegral_dirac'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_dirac' := setIntegral_dirac'
theorem setIntegral_dirac [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → E) (a : α)
(s : Set α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
∫ x in s, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = if a ∈ s then f a else 0 := by
rw [restrict_dirac]
split_ifs
· exact integral_dirac _ _
· exact integral_zero_measure _
#align measure_theory.set_integral_dirac MeasureTheory.setIntegral_dirac
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_dirac := setIntegral_dirac
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. -/
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_integral_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hf_int : Integrable f μ) (ε : ℝ) : ε * (μ { x | ε ≤ f x }).toReal ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
cases' eq_top_or_lt_top (μ {x | ε ≤ f x}) with hμ hμ
· simpa [hμ] using integral_nonneg_of_ae hf_nonneg
· have := Fact.mk hμ
calc
ε * (μ { x | ε ≤ f x }).toReal = ∫ _ in {x | ε ≤ f x}, ε ∂μ := by simp [mul_comm]
_ ≤ ∫ x in {x | ε ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ :=
integral_mono_ae (integrable_const _) (hf_int.mono_measure μ.restrict_le_self) <|
ae_restrict_mem₀ <| hf_int.aemeasurable.nullMeasurable measurableSet_Ici
_ ≤ _ := integral_mono_measure μ.restrict_le_self hf_nonneg hf_int
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_integral_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_integral_of_nonneg
/-- Hölder's inequality for the integral of a product of norms. The integral of the product of two
norms of functions is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are
conjugate exponents. -/
theorem integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f g : α → E} {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.IsConjExponent q) (hf : Memℒp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ)
(hg : Memℒp g (ENNReal.ofReal q) μ) :
∫ a, ‖f a‖ * ‖g a‖ ∂μ ≤ (∫ a, ‖f a‖ ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫ a, ‖g a‖ ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
-- translate the Bochner integrals into Lebesgue integrals.
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae,
integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
rotate_left
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x => Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
· exact (hg.1.norm.aemeasurable.pow aemeasurable_const).aestronglyMeasurable
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x => Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
· exact (hf.1.norm.aemeasurable.pow aemeasurable_const).aestronglyMeasurable
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x => mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
· exact hf.1.norm.mul hg.1.norm
rw [ENNReal.toReal_rpow, ENNReal.toReal_rpow, ← ENNReal.toReal_mul]
-- replace norms by nnnorm
have h_left : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (‖f a‖ * ‖g a‖) ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, ((fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) * fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply, ← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_mul (norm_nonneg _)]
have h_right_f : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (‖f a‖ ^ p) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr fun x => ?_
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hpq.nonneg]
have h_right_g : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (‖g a‖ ^ q) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr fun x => ?_
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hpq.symm.nonneg]
rw [h_left, h_right_f, h_right_g]
-- we can now apply `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` (up to the `toReal` application)
refine ENNReal.toReal_mono ?_ ?_
· refine ENNReal.mul_ne_top ?_ ?_
· convert hf.snorm_ne_top
rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hpq.nonneg]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact hpq.pos
· exact ENNReal.coe_ne_top
· convert hg.snorm_ne_top
rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hpq.symm.nonneg]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact hpq.symm.pos
· exact ENNReal.coe_ne_top
· exact ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf.1.nnnorm.aemeasurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal
hg.1.nnnorm.aemeasurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq MeasureTheory.integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ`. The integral of the product of two nonnegative
functions is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.IsConjExponent q) {f g : α → ℝ}
(hf_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : Memℒp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ)
(hg : Memℒp g (ENNReal.ofReal q) μ) :
∫ a, f a * g a ∂μ ≤ (∫ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
have h_left : ∫ a, f a * g a ∂μ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ * ‖g a‖ ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf_nonneg, hg_nonneg] with x hxf hxg
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hxf, Real.norm_of_nonneg hxg]
have h_right_f : ∫ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ^ p ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf_nonneg] with x hxf
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hxf]
have h_right_g : ∫ a, g a ^ q ∂μ = ∫ a, ‖g a‖ ^ q ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hg_nonneg] with x hxg
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hxg]
rw [h_left, h_right_f, h_right_g]
exact integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq hpq hf hg
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg
theorem integral_countable' [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∑' a, (μ {a}).toReal • f a := by
rw [← Measure.sum_smul_dirac μ] at hf
rw [← Measure.sum_smul_dirac μ, integral_sum_measure hf]
congr 1 with a : 1
rw [integral_smul_measure, integral_dirac, Measure.sum_smul_dirac]
theorem integral_singleton' {μ : Measure α} {f : α → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (a : α) :
∫ a in {a}, f a ∂μ = (μ {a}).toReal • f a := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_singleton, integral_smul_measure, integral_dirac' f a hf, smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm]
theorem integral_singleton [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} (f : α → E) (a : α) :
∫ a in {a}, f a ∂μ = (μ {a}).toReal • f a := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_singleton, integral_smul_measure, integral_dirac, smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm]
theorem integral_countable [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → E) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : Integrable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ = ∑' a : s, (μ {(a : α)}).toReal • f a := by
have hi : Countable { x // x ∈ s } := Iff.mpr countable_coe_iff hs
have hf' : Integrable (fun (x : s) => f x) (Measure.comap Subtype.val μ) := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe, integrable_map_measure] at hf
· apply hf
· exact Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable hf
· exact Measurable.aemeasurable measurable_subtype_coe
· exact Countable.measurableSet hs
rw [← integral_subtype_comap hs.measurableSet, integral_countable' hf']
congr 1 with a : 1
rw [Measure.comap_apply Subtype.val Subtype.coe_injective
(fun s' hs' => MeasurableSet.subtype_image (Countable.measurableSet hs) hs') _
(MeasurableSet.singleton a)]
simp
theorem integral_finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → E)
(hf : Integrable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∑ x ∈ s, (μ {x}).toReal • f x := by
rw [integral_countable _ s.countable_toSet hf, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
theorem integral_fintype [MeasurableSingletonClass α] [Fintype α] (f : α → E)
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑ x, (μ {x}).toReal • f x := by
-- NB: Integrable f does not follow from Fintype, because the measure itself could be non-finite
rw [← integral_finset .univ, Finset.coe_univ, Measure.restrict_univ]
simp only [Finset.coe_univ, Measure.restrict_univ, hf]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 1,930 | 1,933 | theorem integral_unique [Unique α] (f : α → E) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = (μ univ).toReal • f default :=
calc
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ _, f default ∂μ := by | congr with x; congr; exact Unique.uniq _ x
_ = (μ univ).toReal • f default := by rw [integral_const]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
#align_import linear_algebra.projective_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4658a649d216f57e99621708b09dcb3dcccbd23"
/-!
# Projective Spaces
This file contains the definition of the projectivization of a vector space over a field,
as well as the bijection between said projectivization and the collection of all one
dimensional subspaces of the vector space.
## Notation
`ℙ K V` is localized notation for `Projectivization K V`, the projectivization of a `K`-vector
space `V`.
## Constructing terms of `ℙ K V`.
We have three ways to construct terms of `ℙ K V`:
- `Projectivization.mk K v hv` where `v : V` and `hv : v ≠ 0`.
- `Projectivization.mk' K v` where `v : { w : V // w ≠ 0 }`.
- `Projectivization.mk'' H h` where `H : Submodule K V` and `h : finrank H = 1`.
## Other definitions
- For `v : ℙ K V`, `v.submodule` gives the corresponding submodule of `V`.
- `Projectivization.equivSubmodule` is the equivalence between `ℙ K V`
and `{ H : Submodule K V // finrank H = 1 }`.
- For `v : ℙ K V`, `v.rep : V` is a representative of `v`.
-/
variable (K V : Type*) [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
/-- The setoid whose quotient is the projectivization of `V`. -/
def projectivizationSetoid : Setoid { v : V // v ≠ 0 } :=
(MulAction.orbitRel Kˣ V).comap (↑)
#align projectivization_setoid projectivizationSetoid
/-- The projectivization of the `K`-vector space `V`.
The notation `ℙ K V` is preferred. -/
def Projectivization := Quotient (projectivizationSetoid K V)
#align projectivization Projectivization
/-- We define notations `ℙ K V` for the projectivization of the `K`-vector space `V`. -/
scoped[LinearAlgebra.Projectivization] notation "ℙ" => Projectivization
namespace Projectivization
open scoped LinearAlgebra.Projectivization
variable {V}
/-- Construct an element of the projectivization from a nonzero vector. -/
def mk (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : ℙ K V :=
Quotient.mk'' ⟨v, hv⟩
#align projectivization.mk Projectivization.mk
/-- A variant of `Projectivization.mk` in terms of a subtype. `mk` is preferred. -/
def mk' (v : { v : V // v ≠ 0 }) : ℙ K V :=
Quotient.mk'' v
#align projectivization.mk' Projectivization.mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_mk (v : { v : V // v ≠ 0 }) : mk' K v = mk K ↑v v.2 := rfl
#align projectivization.mk'_eq_mk Projectivization.mk'_eq_mk
instance [Nontrivial V] : Nonempty (ℙ K V) :=
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := exists_ne (0 : V)
⟨mk K v hv⟩
variable {K}
/-- Choose a representative of `v : Projectivization K V` in `V`. -/
protected noncomputable def rep (v : ℙ K V) : V :=
v.out'
#align projectivization.rep Projectivization.rep
theorem rep_nonzero (v : ℙ K V) : v.rep ≠ 0 :=
v.out'.2
#align projectivization.rep_nonzero Projectivization.rep_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem mk_rep (v : ℙ K V) : mk K v.rep v.rep_nonzero = v := Quotient.out_eq' _
#align projectivization.mk_rep Projectivization.mk_rep
open FiniteDimensional
/-- Consider an element of the projectivization as a submodule of `V`. -/
protected def submodule (v : ℙ K V) : Submodule K V :=
(Quotient.liftOn' v fun v => K ∙ (v : V)) <| by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨x, rfl : x • b = a⟩
exact Submodule.span_singleton_group_smul_eq _ x _
#align projectivization.submodule Projectivization.submodule
variable (K)
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff (v w : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
mk K v hv = mk K w hw ↔ ∃ a : Kˣ, a • w = v :=
Quotient.eq''
#align projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff Projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff
/-- Two nonzero vectors go to the same point in projective space if and only if one is
a scalar multiple of the other. -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff' (v w : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
mk K v hv = mk K w hw ↔ ∃ a : K, a • w = v := by
rw [mk_eq_mk_iff K v w hv hw]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
refine ⟨Units.mk0 a fun c => hv.symm ?_, ha⟩
rwa [c, zero_smul] at ha
#align projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff' Projectivization.mk_eq_mk_iff'
theorem exists_smul_eq_mk_rep (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : ∃ a : Kˣ, a • v = (mk K v hv).rep :=
(mk_eq_mk_iff K _ _ (rep_nonzero _) hv).1 (mk_rep _)
#align projectivization.exists_smul_eq_mk_rep Projectivization.exists_smul_eq_mk_rep
variable {K}
/-- An induction principle for `Projectivization`.
Use as `induction v using Projectivization.ind`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem ind {P : ℙ K V → Prop} (h : ∀ (v : V) (h : v ≠ 0), P (mk K v h)) : ∀ p, P p :=
Quotient.ind' <| Subtype.rec <| h
#align projectivization.ind Projectivization.ind
@[simp]
theorem submodule_mk (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : (mk K v hv).submodule = K ∙ v :=
rfl
#align projectivization.submodule_mk Projectivization.submodule_mk
theorem submodule_eq (v : ℙ K V) : v.submodule = K ∙ v.rep := by
conv_lhs => rw [← v.mk_rep]
rfl
#align projectivization.submodule_eq Projectivization.submodule_eq
theorem finrank_submodule (v : ℙ K V) : finrank K v.submodule = 1 := by
rw [submodule_eq]
exact finrank_span_singleton v.rep_nonzero
#align projectivization.finrank_submodule Projectivization.finrank_submodule
instance (v : ℙ K V) : FiniteDimensional K v.submodule := by
rw [← v.mk_rep]
change FiniteDimensional K (K ∙ v.rep)
infer_instance
theorem submodule_injective :
Function.Injective (Projectivization.submodule : ℙ K V → Submodule K V) := fun u v h ↦ by
induction' u using ind with u hu
induction' v using ind with v hv
rw [submodule_mk, submodule_mk, Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
exact ((mk_eq_mk_iff K v u hv hu).2 h).symm
#align projectivization.submodule_injective Projectivization.submodule_injective
variable (K V)
/-- The equivalence between the projectivization and the
collection of subspaces of dimension 1. -/
noncomputable def equivSubmodule : ℙ K V ≃ { H : Submodule K V // finrank K H = 1 } :=
(Equiv.ofInjective _ submodule_injective).trans <| .subtypeEquiv (.refl _) fun H ↦ by
refine ⟨fun ⟨v, hv⟩ ↦ hv ▸ v.finrank_submodule, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rcases finrank_eq_one_iff'.1 h with ⟨v : H, hv₀, hv : ∀ w : H, _⟩
use mk K (v : V) (Subtype.coe_injective.ne hv₀)
rw [submodule_mk, SetLike.ext'_iff, Submodule.span_singleton_eq_range]
refine (Set.range_subset_iff.2 fun _ ↦ H.smul_mem _ v.2).antisymm fun x hx ↦ ?_
rcases hv ⟨x, hx⟩ with ⟨c, hc⟩
exact ⟨c, congr_arg Subtype.val hc⟩
#align projectivization.equiv_submodule Projectivization.equivSubmodule
variable {K V}
/-- Construct an element of the projectivization from a subspace of dimension 1. -/
noncomputable def mk'' (H : Submodule K V) (h : finrank K H = 1) : ℙ K V :=
(equivSubmodule K V).symm ⟨H, h⟩
#align projectivization.mk'' Projectivization.mk''
@[simp]
theorem submodule_mk'' (H : Submodule K V) (h : finrank K H = 1) : (mk'' H h).submodule = H :=
congr_arg Subtype.val <| (equivSubmodule K V).apply_symm_apply ⟨H, h⟩
#align projectivization.submodule_mk'' Projectivization.submodule_mk''
@[simp]
theorem mk''_submodule (v : ℙ K V) : mk'' v.submodule v.finrank_submodule = v :=
(equivSubmodule K V).symm_apply_apply v
#align projectivization.mk''_submodule Projectivization.mk''_submodule
section Map
variable {L W : Type*} [DivisionRing L] [AddCommGroup W] [Module L W]
/-- An injective semilinear map of vector spaces induces a map on projective spaces. -/
def map {σ : K →+* L} (f : V →ₛₗ[σ] W) (hf : Function.Injective f) : ℙ K V → ℙ L W :=
Quotient.map' (fun v => ⟨f v, fun c => v.2 (hf (by simp [c]))⟩)
(by
rintro ⟨u, hu⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨a, ha⟩
use Units.map σ.toMonoidHom a
dsimp at ha ⊢
erw [← f.map_smulₛₗ, ha])
#align projectivization.map Projectivization.map
theorem map_mk {σ : K →+* L} (f : V →ₛₗ[σ] W) (hf : Function.Injective f) (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
map f hf (mk K v hv) = mk L (f v) (map_zero f ▸ hf.ne hv) :=
rfl
/-- Mapping with respect to a semilinear map over an isomorphism of fields yields
an injective map on projective spaces. -/
theorem map_injective {σ : K →+* L} {τ : L →+* K} [RingHomInvPair σ τ] (f : V →ₛₗ[σ] W)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (map f hf) := fun u v h ↦ by
induction' u using ind with u hu; induction' v using ind with v hv
simp only [map_mk, mk_eq_mk_iff'] at h ⊢
rcases h with ⟨a, ha⟩
refine ⟨τ a, hf ?_⟩
rwa [f.map_smulₛₗ, RingHomInvPair.comp_apply_eq₂]
#align projectivization.map_injective Projectivization.map_injective
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projectivization/Basic.lean | 222 | 224 | theorem map_id : map (LinearMap.id : V →ₗ[K] V) (LinearEquiv.refl K V).injective = id := by |
ext ⟨v⟩
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_def Pi.himp_def
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_def Pi.hnot_def
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_apply Pi.himp_apply
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_apply Pi.hnot_apply
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_left_comm himp_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_idem himp_idem
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
#align himp_inf_distrib himp_inf_distrib
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
#align sup_himp_distrib sup_himp_distrib
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
#align himp_le_himp_left himp_le_himp_left
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
#align himp_le_himp_right himp_le_himp_right
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
#align himp_le_himp himp_le_himp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_left sup_himp_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_right sup_himp_self_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_right Codisjoint.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_left Codisjoint.himp_eq_left
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
#align le_himp_himp le_himp_himp
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
#align himp_triangle himp_triangle
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
#align himp_inf_himp_cancel himp_inf_himp_cancel
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
#align prod.generalized_heyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_heyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
#align sdiff_sdiff sdiff_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_left sdiff_sdiff_left
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_comm sdiff_sdiff_comm
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_idem sdiff_idem
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
#align sdiff_sdiff_self sdiff_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align sup_sdiff_distrib sup_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
#align sdiff_inf_distrib sdiff_inf_distrib
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
#align sup_sdiff sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sup_sdiff_right_self sup_sdiff_right_self
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
#align sup_sdiff_left_self sup_sdiff_left_self
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_right sdiff_le_sdiff_right
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_left sdiff_le_sdiff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
#align sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_le_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
#align sdiff_inf sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_left sdiff_inf_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_right sdiff_inf_self_right
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_left Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_right Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
#align disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
#align sdiff_sdiff_le sdiff_sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_triangle sdiff_triangle
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
#align sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
#align inf_sdiff_sup_left inf_sdiff_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
#align inf_sdiff_sup_right inf_sdiff_sup_right
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
#align prod.generalized_coheyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_coheyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
#align himp_bot himp_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_himp bot_himp
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
#align compl_sup_distrib compl_sup_distrib
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
#align compl_sup compl_sup
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
#align compl_le_himp compl_le_himp
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
#align compl_sup_le_himp compl_sup_le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
#align sup_compl_le_himp sup_compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_compl himp_compl
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
#align himp_compl_comm himp_compl_comm
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
#align le_compl_iff_disjoint_right le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
#align le_compl_iff_disjoint_left le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
#align le_compl_comm le_compl_comm
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
#align disjoint.le_compl_right Disjoint.le_compl_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
#align disjoint.le_compl_left Disjoint.le_compl_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
#align le_compl_iff_le_compl le_compl_iff_le_compl
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
#align le_compl_of_le_compl le_compl_of_le_compl
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
#align disjoint_compl_left disjoint_compl_left
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
#align disjoint_compl_right disjoint_compl_right
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
#align has_le.le.disjoint_compl_left LE.le.disjoint_compl_left
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
#align has_le.le.disjoint_compl_right LE.le.disjoint_compl_right
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
#align is_compl.compl_eq IsCompl.compl_eq
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
#align is_compl.eq_compl IsCompl.eq_compl
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
#align compl_unique compl_unique
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
#align inf_compl_self inf_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
#align compl_inf_self compl_inf_self
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
#align inf_compl_eq_bot inf_compl_eq_bot
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
#align compl_inf_eq_bot compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
#align compl_top compl_top
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
#align compl_bot compl_bot
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
#align le_compl_compl le_compl_compl
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
#align compl_anti compl_anti
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
#align compl_le_compl compl_le_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
#align compl_compl_compl compl_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
#align disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 874 | 875 | theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by |
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
#align_import data.polynomial.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The main defs here are `eval₂`, `eval`, and `map`.
We give several lemmas about their interaction with each other and with module operations.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar ring
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target -/
irreducible_def eval₂ (p : R[X]) : S :=
p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e
#align polynomial.eval₂ Polynomial.eval₂
theorem eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval₂_def]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum
theorem eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {f g : R →+* S} {s t : S}
{φ ψ : R[X]} : f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ := by
rintro rfl rfl rfl; rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_congr Polynomial.eval₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero,
mul_one, sum, Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff,
RingHom.map_zero, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_zero Polynomial.eval₂_at_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 0 := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_zero Polynomial.eval₂_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_C Polynomial.eval₂_C
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X Polynomial.eval₂_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = f r * x ^ n := by
simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_monomial Polynomial.eval₂_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n).eval₂ f x = x ^ n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial]
convert eval₂_monomial f x (n := n) (r := 1)
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_pow Polynomial.eval₂_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum]
apply sum_add_index <;> simp [add_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_add Polynomial.eval₂_add
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_one : (1 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 1 := by rw [← C_1, eval₂_C, f.map_one]
#align polynomial.eval₂_one Polynomial.eval₂_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval₂ f x = bit0 (p.eval₂ f x) := by rw [bit0, eval₂_add, bit0]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit0 Polynomial.eval₂_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval₂ f x = bit1 (p.eval₂ f x) := by
rw [bit1, eval₂_add, eval₂_bit0, eval₂_one, bit1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit1 Polynomial.eval₂_bit1
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Eval.lean | 110 | 115 | theorem eval₂_smul (g : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (x : S) {s : R} :
eval₂ g x (s • p) = g s * eval₂ g x p := by |
have A : p.natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := Nat.lt_succ_self _
have B : (s • p).natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := (natDegree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt A
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_over_range' _ _ _ A, sum_over_range' _ _ _ B] <;>
simp [mul_sum, mul_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
import Mathlib.Analysis.MellinTransform
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gamma.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cca40788df1b8755d5baf17ab2f27dacc2e17acb"
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
* `Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma`: `Γ` is complex-differentiable at all `s : ℂ` with
`s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`,
`Real.differentiableAt_Gamma`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
#align real.Gamma_integrand_is_o Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
#align real.Gamma_integral_convergent Real.GammaIntegral_convergent
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply ContinuousAt.continuousOn
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
#align complex.Gamma_integral_convergent Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
#align complex.Gamma_integral Complex.GammaIntegral
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 123 | 129 | theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by |
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yourong Zang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yourong Zang, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
#align_import topology.alexandroff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
/-!
# The OnePoint Compactification
We construct the OnePoint compactification (the one-point compactification) of an arbitrary
topological space `X` and prove some properties inherited from `X`.
## Main definitions
* `OnePoint`: the OnePoint compactification, we use coercion for the canonical embedding
`X → OnePoint X`; when `X` is already compact, the compactification adds an isolated point
to the space.
* `OnePoint.infty`: the extra point
## Main results
* The topological structure of `OnePoint X`
* The connectedness of `OnePoint X` for a noncompact, preconnected `X`
* `OnePoint X` is `T₀` for a T₀ space `X`
* `OnePoint X` is `T₁` for a T₁ space `X`
* `OnePoint X` is normal if `X` is a locally compact Hausdorff space
## Tags
one-point compactification, compactness
-/
open Set Filter Topology
/-!
### Definition and basic properties
In this section we define `OnePoint X` to be the disjoint union of `X` and `∞`, implemented as
`Option X`. Then we restate some lemmas about `Option X` for `OnePoint X`.
-/
variable {X : Type*}
/-- The OnePoint extension of an arbitrary topological space `X` -/
def OnePoint (X : Type*) :=
Option X
#align alexandroff OnePoint
/-- The repr uses the notation from the `OnePoint` locale. -/
instance [Repr X] : Repr (OnePoint X) :=
⟨fun o _ =>
match o with
| none => "∞"
| some a => "↑" ++ repr a⟩
namespace OnePoint
/-- The point at infinity -/
@[match_pattern] def infty : OnePoint X := none
#align alexandroff.infty OnePoint.infty
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "∞" => OnePoint.infty
/-- Coercion from `X` to `OnePoint X`. -/
@[coe, match_pattern] def some : X → OnePoint X := Option.some
instance : CoeTC X (OnePoint X) := ⟨some⟩
instance : Inhabited (OnePoint X) := ⟨∞⟩
instance [Fintype X] : Fintype (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Fintype (Option X))
instance infinite [Infinite X] : Infinite (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Infinite (Option X))
#align alexandroff.infinite OnePoint.infinite
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
Option.some_injective X
#align alexandroff.coe_injective OnePoint.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : X} : (x : OnePoint X) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
#align alexandroff.coe_eq_coe OnePoint.coe_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_infty (x : X) : (x : OnePoint X) ≠ ∞ :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.coe_ne_infty OnePoint.coe_ne_infty
@[simp]
theorem infty_ne_coe (x : X) : ∞ ≠ (x : OnePoint X) :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.infty_ne_coe OnePoint.infty_ne_coe
/-- Recursor for `OnePoint` using the preferred forms `∞` and `↑x`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def rec {C : OnePoint X → Sort*} (h₁ : C ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x : X, C x) :
∀ z : OnePoint X, C z
| ∞ => h₁
| (x : X) => h₂ x
#align alexandroff.rec OnePoint.rec
theorem isCompl_range_coe_infty : IsCompl (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) {∞} :=
isCompl_range_some_none X
#align alexandroff.is_compl_range_coe_infty OnePoint.isCompl_range_coe_infty
-- Porting note: moved @[simp] to a new lemma
theorem range_coe_union_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∪ {∞} = univ :=
range_some_union_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_union_infty OnePoint.range_coe_union_infty
@[simp]
theorem insert_infty_range_coe : insert ∞ (range (@some X)) = univ :=
insert_none_range_some _
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_inter_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∩ {∞} = ∅ :=
range_some_inter_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_inter_infty OnePoint.range_coe_inter_infty
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_coe : (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X))ᶜ = {∞} :=
compl_range_some X
#align alexandroff.compl_range_coe OnePoint.compl_range_coe
theorem compl_infty : ({∞}ᶜ : Set (OnePoint X)) = range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
(@isCompl_range_coe_infty X).symm.compl_eq
#align alexandroff.compl_infty OnePoint.compl_infty
theorem compl_image_coe (s : Set X) : ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ = (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [coe_injective.compl_image_eq, compl_range_coe]
#align alexandroff.compl_image_coe OnePoint.compl_image_coe
theorem ne_infty_iff_exists {x : OnePoint X} : x ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ y : X, (y : OnePoint X) = x := by
induction x using OnePoint.rec <;> simp
#align alexandroff.ne_infty_iff_exists OnePoint.ne_infty_iff_exists
instance canLift : CanLift (OnePoint X) X (↑) fun x => x ≠ ∞ :=
WithTop.canLift
#align alexandroff.can_lift OnePoint.canLift
theorem not_mem_range_coe_iff {x : OnePoint X} : x ∉ range some ↔ x = ∞ := by
rw [← mem_compl_iff, compl_range_coe, mem_singleton_iff]
#align alexandroff.not_mem_range_coe_iff OnePoint.not_mem_range_coe_iff
theorem infty_not_mem_range_coe : ∞ ∉ range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
not_mem_range_coe_iff.2 rfl
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_range_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_range_coe
theorem infty_not_mem_image_coe {s : Set X} : ∞ ∉ ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) '' s :=
not_mem_subset (image_subset_range _ _) infty_not_mem_range_coe
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_image_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_image_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_infty : ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' {∞} = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align alexandroff.coe_preimage_infty OnePoint.coe_preimage_infty
/-!
### Topological space structure on `OnePoint X`
We define a topological space structure on `OnePoint X` so that `s` is open if and only if
* `(↑) ⁻¹' s` is open in `X`;
* if `∞ ∈ s`, then `((↑) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ` is compact.
Then we reformulate this definition in a few different ways, and prove that
`(↑) : X → OnePoint X` is an open embedding. If `X` is not a compact space, then we also prove
that `(↑)` has dense range, so it is a dense embedding.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
instance : TopologicalSpace (OnePoint X) where
IsOpen s := (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ) ∧
IsOpen (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro ⟨hms, hs⟩ ⟨hmt, ht⟩
refine ⟨?_, hs.inter ht⟩
rintro ⟨hms', hmt'⟩
simpa [compl_inter] using (hms hms').union (hmt hmt')
isOpen_sUnion S ho := by
suffices IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' ⋃₀ S : Set X) by
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rintro ⟨s, hsS : s ∈ S, hs : ∞ ∈ s⟩
refine IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset ((ho s hsS).1 hs) this.isClosed_compl ?_
exact compl_subset_compl.mpr (preimage_mono <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hsS)
rw [preimage_sUnion]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun s hs => (ho s hs).2
variable {s : Set (OnePoint X)} {t : Set X}
theorem isOpen_def :
IsOpen s ↔ (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ) ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) :=
Iff.rfl
#align alexandroff.is_open_def OnePoint.isOpen_def
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem' (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem' OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem'
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_of_mem' h, isClosed_compl_iff, and_comm]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem
theorem isOpen_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) : IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_not_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) : IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
have : ∞ ∉ sᶜ := fun H => H h
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_not_mem this, ← isOpen_compl_iff, preimage_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_mem (mem_compl h), ← preimage_compl, compl_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_image_coe {s : Set X} : IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X)) ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_not_mem infty_not_mem_image_coe, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
#align alexandroff.is_open_image_coe OnePoint.isOpen_image_coe
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactification/OnePoint.lean | 240 | 243 | theorem isOpen_compl_image_coe {s : Set X} :
IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s := by |
rw [isOpen_iff_of_mem, ← preimage_compl, compl_compl, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
exact infty_not_mem_image_coe
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
#align_import analysis.special_functions.compare_exp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b9eaaa7686280fad8cce467f5c3c57ee6ce77f8"
/-!
# Growth estimates on `x ^ y` for complex `x`, `y`
Let `l` be a filter on `ℂ` such that `Complex.re` tends to infinity along `l` and `Complex.im z`
grows at a subexponential rate compared to `Complex.re z`. Then
- `Complex.isLittleO_log_abs_re`: `Real.log ∘ Complex.abs` is `o`-small of
`Complex.re` along `l`;
- `Complex.isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp`: $z^{a_1}e^{b_1 * z} = o\left(z^{a_1}e^{b_1 * z}\right)$
along `l` for any complex `a₁`, `a₂` and real `b₁ < b₂`.
We use these assumptions on `l` for two reasons. First, these are the assumptions that naturally
appear in the proof. Second, in some applications (e.g., in Ilyashenko's proof of the individual
finiteness theorem for limit cycles of polynomial ODEs with hyperbolic singularities only) natural
stronger assumptions (e.g., `im z` is bounded from below and from above) are not available.
-/
open Asymptotics Filter Function
open scoped Topology
namespace Complex
/-- We say that `l : Filter ℂ` is an *exponential comparison filter* if the real part tends to
infinity along `l` and the imaginary part grows subexponentially compared to the real part. These
properties guarantee that `(fun z ↦ z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] (fun z ↦ z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z))`
for any complex `a₁`, `a₂` and real `b₁ < b₂`.
In particular, the second property is automatically satisfied if the imaginary part is bounded along
`l`. -/
structure IsExpCmpFilter (l : Filter ℂ) : Prop where
tendsto_re : Tendsto re l atTop
isBigO_im_pow_re : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =O[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter Complex.IsExpCmpFilter
namespace IsExpCmpFilter
variable {l : Filter ℂ}
/-!
### Alternative constructors
-/
theorem of_isBigO_im_re_rpow (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (r : ℝ) (hr : im =O[l] fun z => z.re ^ r) :
IsExpCmpFilter l :=
⟨hre, fun n =>
IsLittleO.isBigO <|
calc
(fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =O[l] fun z => (z.re ^ r) ^ n := hr.pow n
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => z.re ^ (r * n) :=
((hre.eventually_ge_atTop 0).mono fun z hz => by
simp only [Real.rpow_mul hz r n, Real.rpow_natCast])
_ =o[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re := (isLittleO_rpow_exp_atTop _).comp_tendsto hre ⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_is_O_im_re_rpow Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_isBigO_im_re_rpow
theorem of_isBigO_im_re_pow (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (n : ℕ) (hr : im =O[l] fun z => z.re ^ n) :
IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_isBigO_im_re_rpow hre n <| mod_cast hr
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_is_O_im_re_pow Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_isBigO_im_re_pow
theorem of_boundedUnder_abs_im (hre : Tendsto re l atTop)
(him : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun z => |z.im|) : IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_isBigO_im_re_pow hre 0 <| by
simpa only [pow_zero] using him.isBigO_const (f := im) one_ne_zero
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_bounded_under_abs_im Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_boundedUnder_abs_im
theorem of_boundedUnder_im (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (him_le : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l im)
(him_ge : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l im) : IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_boundedUnder_abs_im hre <| isBoundedUnder_le_abs.2 ⟨him_le, him_ge⟩
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.of_bounded_under_im Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.of_boundedUnder_im
/-!
### Preliminary lemmas
-/
theorem eventually_ne (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : ∀ᶠ w : ℂ in l, w ≠ 0 :=
hl.tendsto_re.eventually_ne_atTop' _
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.eventually_ne Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.eventually_ne
theorem tendsto_abs_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : Tendsto (fun z : ℂ => |z.re|) l atTop :=
tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop.comp hl.tendsto_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.tendsto_abs_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.tendsto_abs_re
theorem tendsto_abs (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : Tendsto abs l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono abs_re_le_abs hl.tendsto_abs_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.tendsto_abs Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.tendsto_abs
theorem isLittleO_log_re_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : (fun z => Real.log z.re) =o[l] re :=
Real.isLittleO_log_id_atTop.comp_tendsto hl.tendsto_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_log_re_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_log_re_re
theorem isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (n : ℕ) :
(fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =o[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re :=
flip IsLittleO.of_pow two_ne_zero <|
calc
(fun z : ℂ ↦ (z.im ^ n) ^ 2) = (fun z ↦ z.im ^ (2 * n)) := by simp only [pow_mul']
_ =O[l] fun z ↦ Real.exp z.re := hl.isBigO_im_pow_re _
_ = fun z ↦ (Real.exp z.re) ^ 1 := by simp only [pow_one]
_ =o[l] fun z ↦ (Real.exp z.re) ^ 2 :=
(isLittleO_pow_pow_atTop_of_lt one_lt_two).comp_tendsto <|
Real.tendsto_exp_atTop.comp hl.tendsto_re
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_im_pow_exp_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re
theorem abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (n : ℕ) :
(fun z : ℂ => |z.im| ^ n) ≤ᶠ[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re := by
simpa using (hl.isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re n).bound zero_lt_one
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.abs_im_pow_eventually_le_exp_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then $\log |z| =o(ℜ z)$ along `l`.
This is the main lemma in the proof of `Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_cpow_exp` below.
-/
theorem isLittleO_log_abs_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : (fun z => Real.log (abs z)) =o[l] re :=
calc
(fun z => Real.log (abs z)) =O[l] fun z => Real.log (√2) + Real.log (max z.re |z.im|) :=
IsBigO.of_bound 1 <|
(hl.tendsto_re.eventually_ge_atTop 1).mono fun z hz => by
have h2 : 0 < √2 := by simp
have hz' : 1 ≤ abs z := hz.trans (re_le_abs z)
have hm₀ : 0 < max z.re |z.im| := lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| one_pos.trans_le hz)
rw [one_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, _root_.abs_of_nonneg (Real.log_nonneg hz')]
refine le_trans ?_ (le_abs_self _)
rw [← Real.log_mul, Real.log_le_log_iff, ← _root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_trans zero_le_one hz)]
exacts [abs_le_sqrt_two_mul_max z, one_pos.trans_le hz', mul_pos h2 hm₀, h2.ne', hm₀.ne']
_ =o[l] re :=
IsLittleO.add (isLittleO_const_left.2 <| Or.inr <| hl.tendsto_abs_re) <|
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le.2 fun n => by
filter_upwards [isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le'.1 hl.isLittleO_log_re_re n,
hl.abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re n,
hl.tendsto_re.eventually_gt_atTop 1] with z hre him h₁
rcases le_total |z.im| z.re with hle | hle
· rwa [max_eq_left hle]
· have H : 1 < |z.im| := h₁.trans_le hle
norm_cast at *
rwa [max_eq_right hle, Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos (Real.log_pos H),
← Real.log_pow, Real.log_le_iff_le_exp (pow_pos (one_pos.trans H) _),
abs_of_pos (one_pos.trans h₁)]
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_log_abs_re Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_log_abs_re
/-!
### Main results
-/
lemma isTheta_cpow_exp_re_mul_log (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) :
(· ^ a) =Θ[l] fun z ↦ Real.exp (re a * Real.log (abs z)) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a) =Θ[l] (fun z : ℂ => (abs z ^ re a)) :=
isTheta_cpow_const_rpow fun _ _ => hl.eventually_ne
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => Real.exp (re a * Real.log (abs z)) :=
(hl.eventually_ne.mono fun z hz => by simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_pos, abs.pos hz, mul_comm])
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then for any complex `a` and any
positive real `b`, we have `(fun z ↦ z ^ a) =o[l] (fun z ↦ exp (b * z))`. -/
theorem isLittleO_cpow_exp (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun z => z ^ a) =o[l] fun z => exp (b * z) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a) =Θ[l] fun z => Real.exp (re a * Real.log (abs z)) :=
hl.isTheta_cpow_exp_re_mul_log a
_ =o[l] fun z => exp (b * z) :=
IsLittleO.of_norm_right <| by
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_exp, re_ofReal_mul, Real.isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
refine (IsEquivalent.refl.sub_isLittleO ?_).symm.tendsto_atTop
(hl.tendsto_re.const_mul_atTop hb)
exact (hl.isLittleO_log_abs_re.const_mul_left _).const_mul_right hb.ne'
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_cpow_exp Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_cpow_exp
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then for any complex `a₁`, `a₂` and any
real `b₁ < b₂`, we have `(fun z ↦ z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] (fun z ↦ z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z))`. -/
theorem isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp {b₁ b₂ : ℝ} (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (hb : b₁ < b₂) (a₁ a₂ : ℂ) :
(fun z => z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =ᶠ[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z) * z ^ (a₁ - a₂) :=
hl.eventually_ne.mono fun z hz => by
simp only
rw [mul_right_comm, ← cpow_add _ _ hz, add_sub_cancel]
_ =o[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z) * exp (↑(b₂ - b₁) * z) :=
((isBigO_refl (fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z)) l).mul_isLittleO <|
hl.isLittleO_cpow_exp _ (sub_pos.2 hb))
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z) := by
simp only [ofReal_sub, sub_mul, mul_assoc, ← exp_add, add_sub_cancel]
norm_cast
#align complex.is_exp_cmp_filter.is_o_cpow_mul_exp Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then for any complex `a` and any
negative real `b`, we have `(fun z ↦ exp (b * z)) =o[l] (fun z ↦ z ^ a)`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/CompareExp.lean | 200 | 201 | theorem isLittleO_exp_cpow (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) {b : ℝ} (hb : b < 0) :
(fun z => exp (b * z)) =o[l] fun z => z ^ a := by | simpa using hl.isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp hb 0 a
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.OfArity
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import set_theory.zfc.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0b3759a8ef0bd8239ecdaa5e1089add5feebe1a"
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ Choice) using Lean's underlying type theory.
We do this in four main steps:
* Define pre-sets inductively.
* Define extensional equivalence on pre-sets and give it a `setoid` instance.
* Define ZFC sets by quotienting pre-sets by extensional equivalence.
* Define classes as sets of ZFC sets.
Then the rest is usual set theory.
## The model
* `PSet`: Pre-set. A pre-set is inductively defined by its indexing type and its members, which are
themselves pre-sets.
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `Class`: Class. Defined as `Set ZFSet`.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
## Other definitions
* `PSet.Type`: Underlying type of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Func`: Underlying family of pre-sets of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of pre-sets. Defined inductively.
* `PSet.omega`, `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `PSet`, as a `Set`.
* `PSet.Arity.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions. Extension of
`PSet.Equiv`.
* `PSet.Resp`: Collection of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions that respect extensional equivalence.
* `PSet.eval`: Turns a `PSet`-valued function that respect extensional equivalence into a
`ZFSet`-valued function.
* `Classical.allDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
* `Class.iota`: Definite description operator.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
## TODO
Prove `ZFSet.mapDefinableAux` computably.
-/
-- Porting note: Lean 3 uses `Set` for `ZFSet`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v
open Function (OfArity)
/-- The type of pre-sets in universe `u`. A pre-set
is a family of pre-sets indexed by a type in `Type u`.
The ZFC universe is defined as a quotient of this
to ensure extensionality. -/
inductive PSet : Type (u + 1)
| mk (α : Type u) (A : α → PSet) : PSet
#align pSet PSet
namespace PSet
/-- The underlying type of a pre-set -/
def «Type» : PSet → Type u
| ⟨α, _⟩ => α
#align pSet.type PSet.Type
/-- The underlying pre-set family of a pre-set -/
def Func : ∀ x : PSet, x.Type → PSet
| ⟨_, A⟩ => A
#align pSet.func PSet.Func
@[simp]
theorem mk_type (α A) : «Type» ⟨α, A⟩ = α :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_type PSet.mk_type
@[simp]
theorem mk_func (α A) : Func ⟨α, A⟩ = A :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_func PSet.mk_func
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ x : PSet, mk x.Type x.Func = x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.eta PSet.eta
/-- Two pre-sets are extensionally equivalent if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family and vice-versa. -/
def Equiv : PSet → PSet → Prop
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => (∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) ∧ (∀ b, ∃ a, Equiv (A a) (B b))
#align pSet.equiv PSet.Equiv
theorem equiv_iff :
∀ {x y : PSet},
Equiv x y ↔ (∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)) ∧ ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ => Iff.rfl
#align pSet.equiv_iff PSet.equiv_iff
theorem Equiv.exists_left {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).1
#align pSet.equiv.exists_left PSet.Equiv.exists_left
theorem Equiv.exists_right {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).2
#align pSet.equiv.exists_right PSet.Equiv.exists_right
@[refl]
protected theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ x, Equiv x x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩, fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.refl PSet.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Equiv.rfl {x} : Equiv x x :=
Equiv.refl x
#align pSet.equiv.rfl PSet.Equiv.rfl
protected theorem Equiv.euc : ∀ {x y z}, Equiv x y → Equiv z y → Equiv x z
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨γβ, βγ⟩ =>
⟨ fun a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.euc ab bc⟩,
fun c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.euc ba cb⟩ ⟩
#align pSet.equiv.euc PSet.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y} : Equiv x y → Equiv y x :=
(Equiv.refl y).euc
#align pSet.equiv.symm PSet.Equiv.symm
protected theorem Equiv.comm {x y} : Equiv x y ↔ Equiv y x :=
⟨Equiv.symm, Equiv.symm⟩
#align pSet.equiv.comm PSet.Equiv.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z} (h1 : Equiv x y) (h2 : Equiv y z) : Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.equiv.trans PSet.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_of_isEmpty (x y : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] [IsEmpty y.Type] : Equiv x y :=
equiv_iff.2 <| by simp
#align pSet.equiv_of_is_empty PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty
instance setoid : Setoid PSet :=
⟨PSet.Equiv, Equiv.refl, Equiv.symm, Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.setoid PSet.setoid
/-- A pre-set is a subset of another pre-set if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family. -/
protected def Subset (x y : PSet) : Prop :=
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (x.Func a) (y.Func b)
#align pSet.subset PSet.Subset
instance : HasSubset PSet :=
⟨PSet.Subset⟩
instance : IsRefl PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
instance : IsTrans PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun x y z hxy hyz a => by
cases' hxy a with b hb
cases' hyz b with c hc
exact ⟨c, hb.trans hc⟩⟩
theorem Equiv.ext : ∀ x y : PSet, Equiv x y ↔ x ⊆ y ∧ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩,
fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.ext PSet.Equiv.ext
theorem Subset.congr_left : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (x ⊆ z ↔ y ⊆ z)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun αγ b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
let ⟨c, ac⟩ := αγ a
⟨c, (Equiv.symm ba).trans ac⟩,
fun βγ a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.trans ab bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_left PSet.Subset.congr_left
theorem Subset.congr_right : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (z ⊆ x ↔ z ⊆ y)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun γα c =>
let ⟨a, ca⟩ := γα c
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ca.trans ab⟩,
fun γβ c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨a, cb.trans (Equiv.symm ab)⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_right PSet.Subset.congr_right
/-- `x ∈ y` as pre-sets if `x` is extensionally equivalent to a member of the family `y`. -/
protected def Mem (x y : PSet.{u}) : Prop :=
∃ b, Equiv x (y.Func b)
#align pSet.mem PSet.Mem
instance : Membership PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.Mem⟩
theorem Mem.mk {α : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (a : α) : A a ∈ mk α A :=
⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩
#align pSet.mem.mk PSet.Mem.mk
theorem func_mem (x : PSet) (i : x.Type) : x.Func i ∈ x := by
cases x
apply Mem.mk
#align pSet.func_mem PSet.func_mem
theorem Mem.ext : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, (∀ w : PSet.{u}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) → Equiv x y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩, h =>
⟨fun a => (h (A a)).1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (h (B b)).2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, ha.symm⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.ext PSet.Mem.ext
theorem Mem.congr_right : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ha.trans hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨a, hb.euc ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_right PSet.Mem.congr_right
theorem equiv_iff_mem {x y : PSet.{u}} : Equiv x y ↔ ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y :=
⟨Mem.congr_right,
match x, y with
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => fun h =>
⟨fun a => h.1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := h.2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, h.symm⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv_iff_mem PSet.equiv_iff_mem
theorem Mem.congr_left : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, x ∈ w ↔ y ∈ w
| _, _, h, ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.symm.trans ha⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.trans ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_left PSet.Mem.congr_left
private theorem mem_wf_aux : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → Acc (· ∈ ·) y
| ⟨α, A⟩, ⟨β, B⟩, H =>
⟨_, by
rintro ⟨γ, C⟩ ⟨b, hc⟩
cases' H.exists_right b with a ha
have H := ha.trans hc.symm
rw [mk_func] at H
exact mem_wf_aux H⟩
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨fun x => mem_wf_aux <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.mem_wf PSet.mem_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation PSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
instance : IsIrrefl PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : PSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align pSet.mem_asymm PSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : PSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align pSet.mem_irrefl PSet.mem_irrefl
/-- Convert a pre-set to a `Set` of pre-sets. -/
def toSet (u : PSet.{u}) : Set PSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align pSet.to_set PSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : PSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.mem_to_set PSet.mem_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : PSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align pSet.nonempty PSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : PSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_def PSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : PSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_of_mem PSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : PSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_to_set_iff PSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
theorem nonempty_type_iff_nonempty {x : PSet} : Nonempty x.Type ↔ PSet.Nonempty x :=
⟨fun ⟨i⟩ => ⟨_, func_mem _ i⟩, fun ⟨_, j, _⟩ => ⟨j⟩⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty PSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_type (x : PSet) [h : Nonempty x.Type] : PSet.Nonempty x :=
nonempty_type_iff_nonempty.1 h
#align pSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type PSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type
/-- Two pre-sets are equivalent iff they have the same members. -/
theorem Equiv.eq {x y : PSet} : Equiv x y ↔ toSet x = toSet y :=
equiv_iff_mem.trans Set.ext_iff.symm
#align pSet.equiv.eq PSet.Equiv.eq
instance : Coe PSet (Set PSet) :=
⟨toSet⟩
/-- The empty pre-set -/
protected def empty : PSet :=
⟨_, PEmpty.elim⟩
#align pSet.empty PSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection PSet :=
⟨PSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited PSet :=
⟨∅⟩
instance : IsEmpty («Type» ∅) :=
⟨PEmpty.elim⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x : PSet.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : PSet.{u}) :=
IsEmpty.exists_iff.1
#align pSet.not_mem_empty PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align pSet.to_set_empty PSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : PSet.{u}) : (∅ : PSet) ⊆ x := fun x => x.elim
#align pSet.empty_subset PSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬PSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [PSet.Nonempty]
#align pSet.not_nonempty_empty PSet.not_nonempty_empty
protected theorem equiv_empty (x : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] : Equiv x ∅ :=
PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty x _
#align pSet.equiv_empty PSet.equiv_empty
/-- Insert an element into a pre-set -/
protected def insert (x y : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Option y.Type, fun o => Option.casesOn o x y.Func⟩
#align pSet.insert PSet.insert
instance : Insert PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.insert⟩
instance : Singleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun s => insert s ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
instance (x y : PSet) : Inhabited (insert x y).Type :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited <| Option y.Type)
/-- The n-th von Neumann ordinal -/
def ofNat : ℕ → PSet
| 0 => ∅
| n + 1 => insert (ofNat n) (ofNat n)
#align pSet.of_nat PSet.ofNat
/-- The von Neumann ordinal ω -/
def omega : PSet :=
⟨ULift ℕ, fun n => ofNat n.down⟩
#align pSet.omega PSet.omega
/-- The pre-set separation operation `{x ∈ a | p x}` -/
protected def sep (p : PSet → Prop) (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨{ a // p (x.Func a) }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩
#align pSet.sep PSet.sep
instance : Sep PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.sep⟩
/-- The pre-set powerset operator -/
def powerset (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Set x.Type, fun p => ⟨{ a // p a }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩⟩
#align pSet.powerset PSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset : ∀ {x y : PSet}, y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => (Subset.congr_left e).2 fun ⟨a, _⟩ => ⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩, fun βα =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, Equiv (B b) (A a) }, fun b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, ba⟩, ba⟩,
fun ⟨_, b, ba⟩ => ⟨b, ba⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_powerset PSet.mem_powerset
/-- The pre-set union operator -/
def sUnion (a : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Σx, (a.Func x).Type, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (a.Func x).Func y⟩
#align pSet.sUnion PSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z
| ⟨α, A⟩, y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, c⟩, (e : Equiv y ((A a).Func c))⟩ =>
have : Func (A a) c ∈ mk (A a).Type (A a).Func := Mem.mk (A a).Func c
⟨_, Mem.mk _ _, (Mem.congr_left e).2 (by rwa [eta] at this)⟩,
fun ⟨⟨β, B⟩, ⟨a, (e : Equiv (mk β B) (A a))⟩, ⟨b, yb⟩⟩ => by
rw [← eta (A a)] at e
exact
let ⟨βt, _⟩ := e
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βt b
⟨⟨a, c⟩, yb.trans bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_sUnion PSet.mem_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : PSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align pSet.to_set_sUnion PSet.toSet_sUnion
/-- The image of a function from pre-sets to pre-sets. -/
def image (f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (x : PSet.{u}) : PSet :=
⟨x.Type, f ∘ x.Func⟩
#align pSet.image PSet.image
-- Porting note: H arguments made explicit.
theorem mem_image {f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}} (H : ∀ x y, Equiv x y → Equiv (f x) (f y)) :
∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, Equiv y (f z)
| ⟨_, A⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨A a, Mem.mk A a, ya⟩, fun ⟨_, ⟨a, za⟩, yz⟩ => ⟨a, yz.trans <| H _ _ za⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_image PSet.mem_image
/-- Universe lift operation -/
protected def Lift : PSet.{u} → PSet.{max u v}
| ⟨α, A⟩ => ⟨ULift.{v, u} α, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift (A x)⟩
#align pSet.lift PSet.Lift
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- Embedding of one universe in another -/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
def embed : PSet.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨ULift.{v, u + 1} PSet, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x⟩
#align pSet.embed PSet.embed
theorem lift_mem_embed : ∀ x : PSet.{u}, PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x ∈ embed.{u, v} := fun x =>
⟨⟨x⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align pSet.lift_mem_embed PSet.lift_mem_embed
/-- Function equivalence is defined so that `f ~ g` iff `∀ x y, x ~ y → f x ~ g y`. This extends to
equivalence of `n`-ary functions. -/
def Arity.Equiv : ∀ {n}, OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → Prop
| 0, a, b => PSet.Equiv a b
| _ + 1, a, b => ∀ x y : PSet, PSet.Equiv x y → Arity.Equiv (a x) (b y)
#align pSet.arity.equiv PSet.Arity.Equiv
theorem Arity.equiv_const {a : PSet.{u}} :
∀ n, Arity.Equiv (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n) (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n)
| 0 => Equiv.rfl
| _ + 1 => fun _ _ _ => Arity.equiv_const _
#align pSet.arity.equiv_const PSet.Arity.equiv_const
/-- `resp n` is the collection of n-ary functions on `PSet` that respect
equivalence, i.e. when the inputs are equivalent the output is as well. -/
def Resp (n) :=
{ x : OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n // Arity.Equiv x x }
#align pSet.resp PSet.Resp
instance Resp.inhabited {n} : Inhabited (Resp n) :=
⟨⟨OfArity.const _ default _, Arity.equiv_const _⟩⟩
#align pSet.resp.inhabited PSet.Resp.inhabited
/-- The `n`-ary image of a `(n + 1)`-ary function respecting equivalence as a function respecting
equivalence. -/
def Resp.f {n} (f : Resp (n + 1)) (x : PSet) : Resp n :=
⟨f.1 x, f.2 _ _ <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.resp.f PSet.Resp.f
/-- Function equivalence for functions respecting equivalence. See `PSet.Arity.Equiv`. -/
def Resp.Equiv {n} (a b : Resp n) : Prop :=
Arity.Equiv a.1 b.1
#align pSet.resp.equiv PSet.Resp.Equiv
@[refl]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.refl {n} (a : Resp n) : Resp.Equiv a a :=
a.2
#align pSet.resp.equiv.refl PSet.Resp.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.euc :
∀ {n} {a b c : Resp n}, Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv c b → Resp.Equiv a c
| 0, _, _, _, hab, hcb => PSet.Equiv.euc hab hcb
| n + 1, a, b, c, hab, hcb => fun x y h =>
@Resp.Equiv.euc n (a.f x) (b.f y) (c.f y) (hab _ _ h) (hcb _ _ <| PSet.Equiv.refl y)
#align pSet.resp.equiv.euc PSet.Resp.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.symm {n} {a b : Resp n} : Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv b a :=
(Resp.Equiv.refl b).euc
#align pSet.resp.equiv.symm PSet.Resp.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.trans {n} {x y z : Resp n} (h1 : Resp.Equiv x y)
(h2 : Resp.Equiv y z) : Resp.Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.resp.equiv.trans PSet.Resp.Equiv.trans
instance Resp.setoid {n} : Setoid (Resp n) :=
⟨Resp.Equiv, Resp.Equiv.refl, Resp.Equiv.symm, Resp.Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.resp.setoid PSet.Resp.setoid
end PSet
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
#align Set ZFSet
namespace PSet
namespace Resp
/-- Helper function for `PSet.eval`. -/
def evalAux :
∀ {n},
{ f : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n // ∀ a b : Resp n, Resp.Equiv a b → f a = f b }
| 0 => ⟨fun a => ⟦a.1⟧, fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound h⟩
| n + 1 =>
let F : Resp (n + 1) → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1) := fun a =>
@Quotient.lift _ _ PSet.setoid (fun x => evalAux.1 (a.f x)) fun _ _ h =>
evalAux.2 _ _ (a.2 _ _ h)
⟨F, fun b c h =>
funext <|
(@Quotient.ind _ _ fun q => F b q = F c q) fun z =>
evalAux.2 (Resp.f b z) (Resp.f c z) (h _ _ (PSet.Equiv.refl z))⟩
#align pSet.resp.eval_aux PSet.Resp.evalAux
/-- An equivalence-respecting function yields an n-ary ZFC set function. -/
def eval (n) : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n :=
evalAux.1
#align pSet.resp.eval PSet.Resp.eval
theorem eval_val {n f x} :
(@eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) ⟦x⟧ = eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align pSet.resp.eval_val PSet.Resp.eval_val
end Resp
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary pre-set
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class inductive Definable (n) : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n → Type (u + 1)
| mk (f) : Definable n (Resp.eval n f)
#align pSet.definable PSet.Definable
attribute [instance] Definable.mk
/-- The evaluation of a function respecting equivalence is definable, by that same function. -/
def Definable.EqMk {n} (f) :
∀ {s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n} (_ : Resp.eval _ f = s), Definable n s
| _, rfl => ⟨f⟩
#align pSet.definable.eq_mk PSet.Definable.EqMk
/-- Turns a definable function into a function that respects equivalence. -/
def Definable.Resp {n} : ∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [Definable n s], Resp n
| _, ⟨f⟩ => f
#align pSet.definable.resp PSet.Definable.Resp
theorem Definable.eq {n} :
∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [H : Definable n s], (@Definable.Resp n s H).eval _ = s
| _, ⟨_⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.definable.eq PSet.Definable.eq
end PSet
namespace Classical
open PSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allDefinable : ∀ {n} (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n), Definable n F
| 0, F =>
let p := @Quotient.exists_rep PSet _ F
@Definable.EqMk 0 ⟨choose p, Equiv.rfl⟩ _ (choose_spec p)
| n + 1, (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1)) => by
have I : (x : ZFSet) → Definable n (F x) := fun x => allDefinable (F x)
refine @Definable.EqMk (n + 1) ⟨fun x : PSet => (@Definable.Resp _ _ (I ⟦x⟧)).1, ?_⟩ _ ?_
· dsimp [Arity.Equiv]
intro x y h
rw [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]
exact (Definable.Resp (F ⟦y⟧)).2
refine funext fun q => Quotient.inductionOn q fun x => ?_
simp_rw [Resp.eval_val, Resp.f]
exact @Definable.eq _ (F ⟦x⟧) (I ⟦x⟧)
#align classical.all_definable Classical.allDefinable
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
#align Set.mk ZFSet.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
#align Set.mk_eq ZFSet.mk_eq
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
#align Set.mk_out ZFSet.mk_out
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
#align Set.eq ZFSet.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
#align Set.sound ZFSet.sound
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
#align Set.exact ZFSet.exact
@[simp]
theorem eval_mk {n f x} :
(@Resp.eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) (mk x) = Resp.eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align Set.eval_mk ZFSet.eval_mk
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PSet.Mem fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
#align Set.mem ZFSet.Mem
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mk_mem_iff ZFSet.mk_mem_iff
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align Set.to_set ZFSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mem_to_set ZFSet.mem_toSet
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
cases' hb with i h
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
#align Set.small_to_set ZFSet.small_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align Set.nonempty ZFSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_def ZFSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_of_mem ZFSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_to_set_iff ZFSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
#align Set.subset ZFSet.Subset
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
#align Set.has_subset ZFSet.hasSubset
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.subset_def ZFSet.subset_def
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
#align Set.subset_iff ZFSet.subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
#align Set.to_set_subset_iff ZFSet.toSet_subset_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
#align Set.ext ZFSet.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x = y ↔ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h], ext⟩
#align Set.ext_iff ZFSet.ext_iff
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
#align Set.to_set_injective ZFSet.toSet_injective
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.to_set_inj ZFSet.toSet_inj
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
#align Set.empty ZFSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
#align Set.not_mem_empty ZFSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align Set.to_set_empty ZFSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
#align Set.empty_subset ZFSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
#align Set.not_nonempty_empty ZFSet.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_mk_iff ZFSet.nonempty_mk_iff
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp
#align Set.eq_empty ZFSet.eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
#align Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 2
⟨PSet.insert, fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.insert ZFSet.Insert
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun x y ⟨α, A⟩ =>
show (x ∈ PSet.mk (Option α) fun o => Option.rec y A o) ↔ mk x = mk y ∨ x ∈ PSet.mk α A from
⟨fun m =>
match m with
| ⟨some a, ha⟩ => Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩
| ⟨none, h⟩ => Or.inl (Quotient.sound h),
fun m =>
match m with
| Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨some a, ha⟩
| Or.inl h => ⟨none, Quotient.exact h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_insert_iff ZFSet.mem_insert_iff
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
#align Set.mem_insert ZFSet.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
#align Set.mem_insert_of_mem ZFSet.mem_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_insert ZFSet.toSet_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Iff.trans mem_insert_iff
⟨fun o => Or.rec (fun h => h) (fun n => absurd n (not_mem_empty _)) o, Or.inl⟩
#align Set.mem_singleton ZFSet.mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_singleton ZFSet.toSet_singleton
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
#align Set.insert_nonempty ZFSet.insert_nonempty
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
#align Set.singleton_nonempty ZFSet.singleton_nonempty
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
#align Set.mem_pair ZFSet.mem_pair
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
#align Set.omega ZFSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_zero ZFSet.omega_zero
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_succ ZFSet.omega_succ
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y), fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sep ZFSet.sep
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, h⟩ => ⟨⟨a, h⟩, by rwa [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]⟩, fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩, pa⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, by
rw [mk_func] at h
rwa [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound h]⟩,
h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_sep ZFSet.mem_sep
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sep ZFSet.toSet_sep
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.powerset, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.powerset ZFSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ =>
show (⟨β, B⟩ : PSet.{u}) ∈ PSet.powerset.{u} ⟨α, A⟩ ↔ _ by simp [mem_powerset, subset_iff]
#align Set.mem_powerset ZFSet.mem_powerset
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
cases' hb with γδ δγ
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
#align Set.sUnion_lem ZFSet.sUnion_lem
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sUnion, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sUnion ZFSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
special-case `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
noncomputable def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := by
classical exact if h : x.Nonempty then ZFSet.sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z) h.some else ∅
#align Set.sInter ZFSet.sInter
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Iff.trans PSet.mem_sUnion
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion ZFSet.mem_sUnion
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
rw [sInter, dif_pos h]
simp only [mem_toSet, mem_sep, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun H => H _ h.some_mem
#align Set.mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align Set.sUnion_empty ZFSet.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := dif_neg <| by simp
#align Set.sInter_empty ZFSet.sInter_empty
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
#align Set.mem_of_mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_of_mem_sInter
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem ZFSet.mem_sUnion_of_mem
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
#align Set.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem ZFSet.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
#align Set.sUnion_singleton ZFSet.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align Set.sInter_singleton ZFSet.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sUnion ZFSet.toSet_sUnion
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
#align Set.to_set_sInter ZFSet.toSet_sInter
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
#align Set.singleton_injective ZFSet.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.singleton_inj ZFSet.singleton_inj
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
#align Set.union ZFSet.union
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
#align Set.inter ZFSet.inter
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
#align Set.diff ZFSet.diff
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
#align Set.to_set_union ZFSet.toSet_union
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_inter ZFSet.toSet_inter
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sdiff ZFSet.toSet_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
#align Set.mem_union ZFSet.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
#align Set.mem_inter ZFSet.mem_inter
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
#align Set.mem_diff ZFSet.mem_diff
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
#align Set.sUnion_pair ZFSet.sUnion_pair
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
#align Set.mem_wf ZFSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
#align Set.induction_on ZFSet.inductionOn
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
-- Porting note: this can't be inferred automatically for some reason.
instance : IsIrrefl ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align Set.mem_asymm ZFSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align Set.mem_irrefl ZFSet.mem_irrefl
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
#align Set.regularity ZFSet.regularity
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable 1 f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := @Definable.Resp 1 f _
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.image r, fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image hr).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image hr).symm⟩
#align Set.image ZFSet.image
theorem image.mk :
∀ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [H : Definable 1 f] (x) {y} (_ : y ∈ x), f y ∈ @image f H x
| _, ⟨F⟩, x, y => Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨a, F.2 _ _ ya⟩
#align Set.image.mk ZFSet.image.mk
@[simp]
theorem mem_image :
∀ {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [H : Definable 1 f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}},
y ∈ @image f H x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y
| _, ⟨_⟩, x, y =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ya⟩, fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ =>
e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
#align Set.mem_image ZFSet.mem_image
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [H : Definable 1 f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_image ZFSet.toSet_image
/-- The range of an indexed family of sets. The universes allow for a more general index type
without manual use of `ULift`. -/
noncomputable def range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) : ZFSet.{max u v} :=
⟦⟨ULift.{v} α, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ ULift.down⟩⟧
#align Set.range ZFSet.range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α : Type u} {f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}} {x : ZFSet.{max u v}} :
x ∈ range.{u, v} f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨z.down, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use ULift.up z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
#align Set.mem_range ZFSet.mem_range
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) :
(range.{u, v} f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_range ZFSet.toSet_range
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
#align Set.pair ZFSet.pair
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
#align Set.to_set_pair ZFSet.toSet_pair
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b) (powerset (powerset (x ∪ y)))
#align Set.pair_sep ZFSet.pairSep
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
#align Set.mem_pair_sep ZFSet.mem_pairSep
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := fun x x' y y' H => by
have ae := ext_iff.1 H
simp only [pair, mem_pair] at ae
obtain rfl : x = x' := by
cases' (ae {x}).1 (by simp) with h h
· exact singleton_injective h
· have m : x' ∈ ({x} : ZFSet) := by simp [h]
rw [mem_singleton.mp m]
have he : x = y → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
cases' (ae {x, y'}).2 (by simp only [eq_self_iff_true, or_true_iff]) with xy'x xy'xx
· rw [eq_comm, ← mem_singleton, ← xy'x, mem_pair]
exact Or.inr rfl
· simpa [eq_comm] using (ext_iff.1 xy'xx y').1 (by simp)
obtain xyx | xyy' := (ae {x, y}).1 (by simp)
· obtain rfl := mem_singleton.mp ((ext_iff.1 xyx y).1 <| by simp)
simp [he rfl]
· obtain rfl | yy' := mem_pair.mp ((ext_iff.1 xyy' y).1 <| by simp)
· simp [he rfl]
· simp [yy']
#align Set.pair_injective ZFSet.pair_injective
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.pair_inj ZFSet.pair_inj
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
#align Set.prod ZFSet.prod
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
#align Set.mem_prod ZFSet.mem_prod
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,309 | 1,310 | theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by |
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.DFA
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
#align_import computability.NFA from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Nondeterministic Finite Automata
This file contains the definition of a Nondeterministic Finite Automaton (NFA), a state machine
which determines whether a string (implemented as a list over an arbitrary alphabet) is in a regular
set by evaluating the string over every possible path.
We show that DFA's are equivalent to NFA's however the construction from NFA to DFA uses an
exponential number of states.
Note that this definition allows for Automaton with infinite states; a `Fintype` instance must be
supplied for true NFA's.
-/
open Set
open Computability
universe u v
-- Porting note: Required as `NFA` is used in mathlib3
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
/-- An NFA is a set of states (`σ`), a transition function from state to state labelled by the
alphabet (`step`), a set of starting states (`start`) and a set of acceptance states (`accept`).
Note the transition function sends a state to a `Set` of states. These are the states that it
may be sent to. -/
structure NFA (α : Type u) (σ : Type v) where
step : σ → α → Set σ
start : Set σ
accept : Set σ
#align NFA NFA
variable {α : Type u} {σ σ' : Type v} (M : NFA α σ)
namespace NFA
instance : Inhabited (NFA α σ) :=
⟨NFA.mk (fun _ _ => ∅) ∅ ∅⟩
/-- `M.stepSet S a` is the union of `M.step s a` for all `s ∈ S`. -/
def stepSet (S : Set σ) (a : α) : Set σ :=
⋃ s ∈ S, M.step s a
#align NFA.step_set NFA.stepSet
| Mathlib/Computability/NFA.lean | 53 | 54 | theorem mem_stepSet (s : σ) (S : Set σ) (a : α) : s ∈ M.stepSet S a ↔ ∃ t ∈ S, s ∈ M.step t a := by |
simp [stepSet]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
#align_import linear_algebra.sesquilinear_form from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"87c54600fe3cdc7d32ff5b50873ac724d86aef8d"
/-!
# Sesquilinear maps
This files provides properties about sesquilinear maps and forms. The maps considered are of the
form `M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M`, where `I₁ : R₁ →+* R` and `I₂ : R₂ →+* R` are ring homomorphisms and
`M₁` is a module over `R₁`, `M₂` is a module over `R₂` and `M` is a module over `R`.
Sesquilinear forms are the special case that `M₁ = M₂`, `M = R₁ = R₂ = R`, and `I₁ = RingHom.id R`.
Taking additionally `I₂ = RingHom.id R`, then one obtains bilinear forms.
These forms are a special case of the bilinear maps defined in `BilinearMap.lean` and all basic
lemmas about construction and elementary calculations are found there.
## Main declarations
* `IsOrtho`: states that two vectors are orthogonal with respect to a sesquilinear map
* `IsSymm`, `IsAlt`: states that a sesquilinear form is symmetric and alternating, respectively
* `orthogonalBilin`: provides the orthogonal complement with respect to sesquilinear form
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sesquilinear_form#Over_arbitrary_rings>
## Tags
Sesquilinear form, Sesquilinear map,
-/
variable {R R₁ R₂ R₃ M M₁ M₂ M₃ Mₗ₁ Mₗ₁' Mₗ₂ Mₗ₂' K K₁ K₂ V V₁ V₂ n : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
/-! ### Orthogonal vectors -/
section CommRing
-- the `ₗ` subscript variables are for special cases about linear (as opposed to semilinear) maps
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [CommSemiring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₂ →+* R} {I₁' : R₁ →+* R}
/-- The proposition that two elements of a sesquilinear map space are orthogonal -/
def IsOrtho (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) (x : M₁) (y : M₂) : Prop :=
B x y = 0
#align linear_map.is_ortho LinearMap.IsOrtho
theorem isOrtho_def {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M} {x y} : B.IsOrtho x y ↔ B x y = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.is_ortho_def LinearMap.isOrtho_def
theorem isOrtho_zero_left (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) (x) : IsOrtho B (0 : M₁) x := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
rw [map_zero B, zero_apply]
#align linear_map.is_ortho_zero_left LinearMap.isOrtho_zero_left
theorem isOrtho_zero_right (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) (x) : IsOrtho B x (0 : M₂) :=
map_zero (B x)
#align linear_map.is_ortho_zero_right LinearMap.isOrtho_zero_right
theorem isOrtho_flip {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M} {x y} : B.IsOrtho x y ↔ B.flip.IsOrtho y x := by
simp_rw [isOrtho_def, flip_apply]
#align linear_map.is_ortho_flip LinearMap.isOrtho_flip
/-- A set of vectors `v` is orthogonal with respect to some bilinear map `B` if and only
if for all `i ≠ j`, `B (v i) (v j) = 0`. For orthogonality between two elements, use
`BilinForm.isOrtho` -/
def IsOrthoᵢ (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M) (v : n → M₁) : Prop :=
Pairwise (B.IsOrtho on v)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align linear_map.is_Ortho LinearMap.IsOrthoᵢ
theorem isOrthoᵢ_def {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M} {v : n → M₁} :
B.IsOrthoᵢ v ↔ ∀ i j : n, i ≠ j → B (v i) (v j) = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align linear_map.is_Ortho_def LinearMap.isOrthoᵢ_def
theorem isOrthoᵢ_flip (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M) {v : n → M₁} :
B.IsOrthoᵢ v ↔ B.flip.IsOrthoᵢ v := by
simp_rw [isOrthoᵢ_def]
constructor <;> intro h i j hij
· rw [flip_apply]
exact h j i (Ne.symm hij)
simp_rw [flip_apply] at h
exact h j i (Ne.symm hij)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align linear_map.is_Ortho_flip LinearMap.isOrthoᵢ_flip
end CommRing
section Field
variable [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Field K₁] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module K₁ V₁]
[Field K₂] [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module K₂ V₂]
{I₁ : K₁ →+* K} {I₂ : K₂ →+* K} {I₁' : K₁ →+* K} {J₁ : K →+* K} {J₂ : K →+* K}
-- todo: this also holds for [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] when J₁ is invertible
theorem ortho_smul_left {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] V} {x y} {a : K₁} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B (a • x) y := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
constructor <;> intro H
· rw [map_smulₛₗ₂, H, smul_zero]
· rw [map_smulₛₗ₂, smul_eq_zero] at H
cases' H with H H
· rw [map_eq_zero I₁] at H
trivial
· exact H
#align linear_map.ortho_smul_left LinearMap.ortho_smul_left
-- todo: this also holds for [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] when J₂ is invertible
theorem ortho_smul_right {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] V} {x y} {a : K₂} {ha : a ≠ 0} :
IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B x (a • y) := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
constructor <;> intro H
· rw [map_smulₛₗ, H, smul_zero]
· rw [map_smulₛₗ, smul_eq_zero] at H
cases' H with H H
· simp at H
exfalso
exact ha H
· exact H
#align linear_map.ortho_smul_right LinearMap.ortho_smul_right
/-- A set of orthogonal vectors `v` with respect to some sesquilinear map `B` is linearly
independent if for all `i`, `B (v i) (v i) ≠ 0`. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_isOrthoᵢ {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] V} {v : n → V₁}
(hv₁ : B.IsOrthoᵢ v) (hv₂ : ∀ i, ¬B.IsOrtho (v i) (v i)) : LinearIndependent K₁ v := by
classical
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s w hs i hi
have : B (s.sum fun i : n ↦ w i • v i) (v i) = 0 := by rw [hs, map_zero, zero_apply]
have hsum : (s.sum fun j : n ↦ I₁ (w j) • B (v j) (v i)) = I₁ (w i) • B (v i) (v i) := by
apply Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem i hi
intro j _hj hij
rw [isOrthoᵢ_def.1 hv₁ _ _ hij, smul_zero]
simp_rw [B.map_sum₂, map_smulₛₗ₂, hsum] at this
apply (map_eq_zero I₁).mp
exact (smul_eq_zero.mp this).elim _root_.id (hv₂ i · |>.elim)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align linear_map.linear_independent_of_is_Ortho LinearMap.linearIndependent_of_isOrthoᵢ
end Field
/-! ### Reflexive bilinear maps -/
section Reflexive
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear map is reflexive -/
def IsRefl (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) : Prop :=
∀ x y, B x y = 0 → B y x = 0
#align linear_map.is_refl LinearMap.IsRefl
namespace IsRefl
variable (H : B.IsRefl)
theorem eq_zero : ∀ {x y}, B x y = 0 → B y x = 0 := fun {x y} ↦ H x y
#align linear_map.is_refl.eq_zero LinearMap.IsRefl.eq_zero
theorem ortho_comm {x y} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
#align linear_map.is_refl.ortho_comm LinearMap.IsRefl.ortho_comm
theorem domRestrict (H : B.IsRefl) (p : Submodule R₁ M₁) : (B.domRestrict₁₂ p p).IsRefl :=
fun _ _ ↦ by
simp_rw [domRestrict₁₂_apply]
exact H _ _
#align linear_map.is_refl.dom_restrict_refl LinearMap.IsRefl.domRestrict
@[simp]
theorem flip_isRefl_iff : B.flip.IsRefl ↔ B.IsRefl :=
⟨fun h x y H ↦ h y x ((B.flip_apply _ _).trans H), fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
#align linear_map.is_refl.flip_is_refl_iff LinearMap.IsRefl.flip_isRefl_iff
theorem ker_flip_eq_bot (H : B.IsRefl) (h : LinearMap.ker B = ⊥) : LinearMap.ker B.flip = ⊥ := by
refine ker_eq_bot'.mpr fun _ hx ↦ ker_eq_bot'.mp h _ ?_
ext
exact H _ _ (LinearMap.congr_fun hx _)
#align linear_map.is_refl.ker_flip_eq_bot LinearMap.IsRefl.ker_flip_eq_bot
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff_ker_flip_eq_bot (H : B.IsRefl) :
LinearMap.ker B = ⊥ ↔ LinearMap.ker B.flip = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨ker_flip_eq_bot H, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
exact (congr_arg _ B.flip_flip.symm).trans (ker_flip_eq_bot (flip_isRefl_iff.mpr H) h)
#align linear_map.is_refl.ker_eq_bot_iff_ker_flip_eq_bot LinearMap.IsRefl.ker_eq_bot_iff_ker_flip_eq_bot
end IsRefl
end Reflexive
/-! ### Symmetric bilinear forms -/
section Symmetric
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {I : R →+* R} {B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is symmetric -/
def IsSymm (B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R) : Prop :=
∀ x y, I (B x y) = B y x
#align linear_map.is_symm LinearMap.IsSymm
namespace IsSymm
protected theorem eq (H : B.IsSymm) (x y) : I (B x y) = B y x :=
H x y
#align linear_map.is_symm.eq LinearMap.IsSymm.eq
theorem isRefl (H : B.IsSymm) : B.IsRefl := fun x y H1 ↦ by
rw [← H.eq]
simp [H1]
#align linear_map.is_symm.is_refl LinearMap.IsSymm.isRefl
theorem ortho_comm (H : B.IsSymm) {x y} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
H.isRefl.ortho_comm
#align linear_map.is_symm.ortho_comm LinearMap.IsSymm.ortho_comm
theorem domRestrict (H : B.IsSymm) (p : Submodule R M) : (B.domRestrict₁₂ p p).IsSymm :=
fun _ _ ↦ by
simp_rw [domRestrict₁₂_apply]
exact H _ _
#align linear_map.is_symm.dom_restrict_symm LinearMap.IsSymm.domRestrict
end IsSymm
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_zero : (0 : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R).IsSymm := fun _ _ => map_zero _
theorem isSymm_iff_eq_flip {B : LinearMap.BilinForm R M} : B.IsSymm ↔ B = B.flip := by
constructor <;> intro h
· ext
rw [← h, flip_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
intro x y
conv_lhs => rw [h]
rfl
#align linear_map.is_symm_iff_eq_flip LinearMap.isSymm_iff_eq_flip
end Symmetric
/-! ### Alternating bilinear maps -/
section Alternating
section CommSemiring
section AddCommMonoid
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {I : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear map is alternating -/
def IsAlt (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) : Prop :=
∀ x, B x x = 0
#align linear_map.is_alt LinearMap.IsAlt
variable (H : B.IsAlt)
theorem IsAlt.self_eq_zero (x : M₁) : B x x = 0 :=
H x
#align linear_map.is_alt.self_eq_zero LinearMap.IsAlt.self_eq_zero
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
namespace IsAlt
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {I : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
variable (H : B.IsAlt)
theorem neg (x y : M₁) : -B x y = B y x := by
have H1 : B (y + x) (y + x) = 0 := self_eq_zero H (y + x)
simp? [map_add, self_eq_zero H] at H1 says
simp only [map_add, add_apply, self_eq_zero H, zero_add, add_zero] at H1
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at H1
exact H1
#align linear_map.is_alt.neg LinearMap.IsAlt.neg
theorem isRefl : B.IsRefl := by
intro x y h
rw [← neg H, h, neg_zero]
#align linear_map.is_alt.is_refl LinearMap.IsAlt.isRefl
theorem ortho_comm {x y} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
H.isRefl.ortho_comm
#align linear_map.is_alt.ortho_comm LinearMap.IsAlt.ortho_comm
end IsAlt
end AddCommGroup
end CommSemiring
section Semiring
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I : R₁ →+* R}
theorem isAlt_iff_eq_neg_flip [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R] {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I] M₁ →ₛₗ[I] R} :
B.IsAlt ↔ B = -B.flip := by
constructor <;> intro h
· ext
simp_rw [neg_apply, flip_apply]
exact (h.neg _ _).symm
intro x
let h' := congr_fun₂ h x x
simp only [neg_apply, flip_apply, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h'
exact add_self_eq_zero.mp h'
#align linear_map.is_alt_iff_eq_neg_flip LinearMap.isAlt_iff_eq_neg_flip
end Semiring
end Alternating
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
/-! ### The orthogonal complement -/
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing R₁] [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
/-- The orthogonal complement of a submodule `N` with respect to some bilinear map is the set of
elements `x` which are orthogonal to all elements of `N`; i.e., for all `y` in `N`, `B x y = 0`.
Note that for general (neither symmetric nor antisymmetric) bilinear maps this definition has a
chirality; in addition to this "left" orthogonal complement one could define a "right" orthogonal
complement for which, for all `y` in `N`, `B y x = 0`. This variant definition is not currently
provided in mathlib. -/
def orthogonalBilin (N : Submodule R₁ M₁) (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) : Submodule R₁ M₁ where
carrier := { m | ∀ n ∈ N, B.IsOrtho n m }
zero_mem' x _ := B.isOrtho_zero_right x
add_mem' hx hy n hn := by
rw [LinearMap.IsOrtho, map_add, show B n _ = 0 from hx n hn, show B n _ = 0 from hy n hn,
zero_add]
smul_mem' c x hx n hn := by
rw [LinearMap.IsOrtho, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, show B n x = 0 from hx n hn, smul_zero]
#align submodule.orthogonal_bilin Submodule.orthogonalBilin
variable {N L : Submodule R₁ M₁}
@[simp]
theorem mem_orthogonalBilin_iff {m : M₁} : m ∈ N.orthogonalBilin B ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, B.IsOrtho n m :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_orthogonal_bilin_iff Submodule.mem_orthogonalBilin_iff
theorem orthogonalBilin_le (h : N ≤ L) : L.orthogonalBilin B ≤ N.orthogonalBilin B :=
fun _ hn l hl ↦ hn l (h hl)
#align submodule.orthogonal_bilin_le Submodule.orthogonalBilin_le
theorem le_orthogonalBilin_orthogonalBilin (b : B.IsRefl) :
N ≤ (N.orthogonalBilin B).orthogonalBilin B := fun n hn _m hm ↦ b _ _ (hm n hn)
#align submodule.le_orthogonal_bilin_orthogonal_bilin Submodule.le_orthogonalBilin_orthogonalBilin
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
section Orthogonal
variable [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Field K₁] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module K₁ V₁]
[AddCommGroup V₂] [Module K V₂] {J : K →+* K} {J₁ : K₁ →+* K} {J₁' : K₁ →+* K}
-- ↓ This lemma only applies in fields as we require `a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0`
theorem span_singleton_inf_orthogonal_eq_bot (B : V₁ →ₛₗ[J₁] V₁ →ₛₗ[J₁'] V₂) (x : V₁)
(hx : ¬B.IsOrtho x x) : (K₁ ∙ x) ⊓ Submodule.orthogonalBilin (K₁ ∙ x) B = ⊥ := by
rw [← Finset.coe_singleton]
refine eq_bot_iff.2 fun y h ↦ ?_
rcases mem_span_finset.1 h.1 with ⟨μ, rfl⟩
replace h := h.2 x (by simp [Submodule.mem_span] : x ∈ Submodule.span K₁ ({x} : Finset V₁))
rw [Finset.sum_singleton] at h ⊢
suffices hμzero : μ x = 0 by rw [hμzero, zero_smul, Submodule.mem_bot]
rw [isOrtho_def, map_smulₛₗ] at h
exact Or.elim (smul_eq_zero.mp h)
(fun y ↦ by simpa using y)
(fun hfalse ↦ False.elim <| hx hfalse)
#align linear_map.span_singleton_inf_orthogonal_eq_bot LinearMap.span_singleton_inf_orthogonal_eq_bot
-- ↓ This lemma only applies in fields since we use the `mul_eq_zero`
theorem orthogonal_span_singleton_eq_to_lin_ker {B : V →ₗ[K] V →ₛₗ[J] V₂} (x : V) :
Submodule.orthogonalBilin (K ∙ x) B = LinearMap.ker (B x) := by
ext y
simp_rw [Submodule.mem_orthogonalBilin_iff, LinearMap.mem_ker, Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· exact fun h ↦ h x ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩
· rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩
rw [isOrtho_def, map_smulₛₗ₂, smul_eq_zero]
exact Or.intro_right _ h
#align linear_map.orthogonal_span_singleton_eq_to_lin_ker LinearMap.orthogonal_span_singleton_eq_to_lin_ker
-- todo: Generalize this to sesquilinear maps
theorem span_singleton_sup_orthogonal_eq_top {B : V →ₗ[K] V →ₗ[K] K} {x : V} (hx : ¬B.IsOrtho x x) :
(K ∙ x) ⊔ Submodule.orthogonalBilin (N := K ∙ x) (B := B) = ⊤ := by
rw [orthogonal_span_singleton_eq_to_lin_ker]
exact (B x).span_singleton_sup_ker_eq_top hx
#align linear_map.span_singleton_sup_orthogonal_eq_top LinearMap.span_singleton_sup_orthogonal_eq_top
-- todo: Generalize this to sesquilinear maps
/-- Given a bilinear form `B` and some `x` such that `B x x ≠ 0`, the span of the singleton of `x`
is complement to its orthogonal complement. -/
theorem isCompl_span_singleton_orthogonal {B : V →ₗ[K] V →ₗ[K] K} {x : V} (hx : ¬B.IsOrtho x x) :
IsCompl (K ∙ x) (Submodule.orthogonalBilin (N := K ∙ x) (B := B)) :=
{ disjoint := disjoint_iff.2 <| span_singleton_inf_orthogonal_eq_bot B x hx
codisjoint := codisjoint_iff.2 <| span_singleton_sup_orthogonal_eq_top hx }
#align linear_map.is_compl_span_singleton_orthogonal LinearMap.isCompl_span_singleton_orthogonal
end Orthogonal
/-! ### Adjoint pairs -/
section AdjointPair
section AddCommMonoid
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃]
variable {I : R →+* R}
variable {B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₛₗ[I] M₃} {B' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁ →ₛₗ[I] M₃} {B'' : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₛₗ[I] M₃}
variable {f f' : M →ₗ[R] M₁} {g g' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M}
variable (B B' f g)
/-- Given a pair of modules equipped with bilinear maps, this is the condition for a pair of
maps between them to be mutually adjoint. -/
def IsAdjointPair :=
∀ x y, B' (f x) y = B x (g y)
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair LinearMap.IsAdjointPair
variable {B B' f g}
theorem isAdjointPair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂ : IsAdjointPair B B' f g ↔ B'.comp f = B.compl₂ g := by
constructor <;> intro h
· ext x y
rw [comp_apply, compl₂_apply]
exact h x y
· intro _ _
rw [← compl₂_apply, ← comp_apply, h]
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂ LinearMap.isAdjointPair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂
theorem isAdjointPair_zero : IsAdjointPair B B' 0 0 := fun _ _ ↦ by simp only [zero_apply, map_zero]
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair_zero LinearMap.isAdjointPair_zero
theorem isAdjointPair_id : IsAdjointPair B B 1 1 := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair_id LinearMap.isAdjointPair_id
theorem IsAdjointPair.add (h : IsAdjointPair B B' f g) (h' : IsAdjointPair B B' f' g') :
IsAdjointPair B B' (f + f') (g + g') := fun x _ ↦ by
rw [f.add_apply, g.add_apply, B'.map_add₂, (B x).map_add, h, h']
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair.add LinearMap.IsAdjointPair.add
theorem IsAdjointPair.comp {f' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂} {g' : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₁} (h : IsAdjointPair B B' f g)
(h' : IsAdjointPair B' B'' f' g') : IsAdjointPair B B'' (f'.comp f) (g.comp g') := fun _ _ ↦ by
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply, h', h]
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair.comp LinearMap.IsAdjointPair.comp
theorem IsAdjointPair.mul {f g f' g' : Module.End R M} (h : IsAdjointPair B B f g)
(h' : IsAdjointPair B B f' g') : IsAdjointPair B B (f * f') (g' * g) :=
h'.comp h
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair.mul LinearMap.IsAdjointPair.mul
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R M₁]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂]
variable {B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M₂} {B' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂}
variable {f f' : M →ₗ[R] M₁} {g g' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M}
theorem IsAdjointPair.sub (h : IsAdjointPair B B' f g) (h' : IsAdjointPair B B' f' g') :
IsAdjointPair B B' (f - f') (g - g') := fun x _ ↦ by
rw [f.sub_apply, g.sub_apply, B'.map_sub₂, (B x).map_sub, h, h']
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair.sub LinearMap.IsAdjointPair.sub
theorem IsAdjointPair.smul (c : R) (h : IsAdjointPair B B' f g) :
IsAdjointPair B B' (c • f) (c • g) := fun _ _ ↦ by
simp [h _]
#align linear_map.is_adjoint_pair.smul LinearMap.IsAdjointPair.smul
end AddCommGroup
end AdjointPair
/-! ### Self-adjoint pairs-/
section SelfadjointPair
section AddCommMonoid
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁]
variable {I : R →+* R}
variable (B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₛₗ[I] M₁)
/-- The condition for an endomorphism to be "self-adjoint" with respect to a pair of bilinear maps
on the underlying module. In the case that these two maps are identical, this is the usual concept
of self adjointness. In the case that one of the maps is the negation of the other, this is the
usual concept of skew adjointness. -/
def IsPairSelfAdjoint (f : Module.End R M) :=
IsAdjointPair B F f f
#align linear_map.is_pair_self_adjoint LinearMap.IsPairSelfAdjoint
/-- An endomorphism of a module is self-adjoint with respect to a bilinear map if it serves as an
adjoint for itself. -/
protected def IsSelfAdjoint (f : Module.End R M) :=
IsAdjointPair B B f f
#align linear_map.is_self_adjoint LinearMap.IsSelfAdjoint
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R M₁]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] (B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- The set of pair-self-adjoint endomorphisms are a submodule of the type of all endomorphisms. -/
def isPairSelfAdjointSubmodule : Submodule R (Module.End R M) where
carrier := { f | IsPairSelfAdjoint B F f }
zero_mem' := isAdjointPair_zero
add_mem' hf hg := hf.add hg
smul_mem' c _ h := h.smul c
#align linear_map.is_pair_self_adjoint_submodule LinearMap.isPairSelfAdjointSubmodule
/-- An endomorphism of a module is skew-adjoint with respect to a bilinear map if its negation
serves as an adjoint. -/
def IsSkewAdjoint (f : Module.End R M) :=
IsAdjointPair B B f (-f)
#align linear_map.is_skew_adjoint LinearMap.IsSkewAdjoint
/-- The set of self-adjoint endomorphisms of a module with bilinear map is a submodule. (In fact
it is a Jordan subalgebra.) -/
def selfAdjointSubmodule :=
isPairSelfAdjointSubmodule B B
#align linear_map.self_adjoint_submodule LinearMap.selfAdjointSubmodule
/-- The set of skew-adjoint endomorphisms of a module with bilinear map is a submodule. (In fact
it is a Lie subalgebra.) -/
def skewAdjointSubmodule :=
isPairSelfAdjointSubmodule (-B) B
#align linear_map.skew_adjoint_submodule LinearMap.skewAdjointSubmodule
variable {B F}
@[simp]
theorem mem_isPairSelfAdjointSubmodule (f : Module.End R M) :
f ∈ isPairSelfAdjointSubmodule B F ↔ IsPairSelfAdjoint B F f :=
Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.mem_is_pair_self_adjoint_submodule LinearMap.mem_isPairSelfAdjointSubmodule
theorem isPairSelfAdjoint_equiv (e : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M) (f : Module.End R M) :
IsPairSelfAdjoint B F f ↔
IsPairSelfAdjoint (B.compl₁₂ ↑e ↑e) (F.compl₁₂ ↑e ↑e) (e.symm.conj f) := by
have hₗ :
(F.compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M)).comp (e.symm.conj f) =
(F.comp f).compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) := by
ext
simp only [LinearEquiv.symm_conj_apply, coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, compl₁₂_apply,
LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Function.comp_apply]
have hᵣ :
(B.compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M)).compl₂ (e.symm.conj f) =
(B.compl₂ f).compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) := by
ext
simp only [LinearEquiv.symm_conj_apply, compl₂_apply, coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe,
compl₁₂_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Function.comp_apply]
have he : Function.Surjective (⇑(↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) : M₁ → M) := e.surjective
simp_rw [IsPairSelfAdjoint, isAdjointPair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂, hₗ, hᵣ, compl₁₂_inj he he]
#align linear_map.is_pair_self_adjoint_equiv LinearMap.isPairSelfAdjoint_equiv
theorem isSkewAdjoint_iff_neg_self_adjoint (f : Module.End R M) :
B.IsSkewAdjoint f ↔ IsAdjointPair (-B) B f f :=
show (∀ x y, B (f x) y = B x ((-f) y)) ↔ ∀ x y, B (f x) y = (-B) x (f y) by simp
#align linear_map.is_skew_adjoint_iff_neg_self_adjoint LinearMap.isSkewAdjoint_iff_neg_self_adjoint
@[simp]
theorem mem_selfAdjointSubmodule (f : Module.End R M) :
f ∈ B.selfAdjointSubmodule ↔ B.IsSelfAdjoint f :=
Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.mem_self_adjoint_submodule LinearMap.mem_selfAdjointSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem mem_skewAdjointSubmodule (f : Module.End R M) :
f ∈ B.skewAdjointSubmodule ↔ B.IsSkewAdjoint f := by
rw [isSkewAdjoint_iff_neg_self_adjoint]
exact Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.mem_skew_adjoint_submodule LinearMap.mem_skewAdjointSubmodule
end AddCommGroup
end SelfadjointPair
/-! ### Nondegenerate bilinear maps -/
section Nondegenerate
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] [CommSemiring R₂] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₂ →+* R} {I₁' : R₁ →+* R}
/-- A bilinear map is called left-separating if
the only element that is left-orthogonal to every other element is `0`; i.e.,
for every nonzero `x` in `M₁`, there exists `y` in `M₂` with `B x y ≠ 0`. -/
def SeparatingLeft (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) : Prop :=
∀ x : M₁, (∀ y : M₂, B x y = 0) → x = 0
#align linear_map.separating_left LinearMap.SeparatingLeft
variable (M₁ M₂ I₁ I₂)
/-- In a non-trivial module, zero is not non-degenerate. -/
theorem not_separatingLeft_zero [Nontrivial M₁] : ¬(0 : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M).SeparatingLeft :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M₁)
fun h ↦ hm (h m fun _n ↦ rfl)
#align linear_map.not_separating_left_zero LinearMap.not_separatingLeft_zero
variable {M₁ M₂ I₁ I₂}
theorem SeparatingLeft.ne_zero [Nontrivial M₁] {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
(h : B.SeparatingLeft) : B ≠ 0 := fun h0 ↦ not_separatingLeft_zero M₁ M₂ I₁ I₂ <| h0 ▸ h
#align linear_map.separating_left.ne_zero LinearMap.SeparatingLeft.ne_zero
section Linear
variable [AddCommMonoid Mₗ₁] [AddCommMonoid Mₗ₂] [AddCommMonoid Mₗ₁'] [AddCommMonoid Mₗ₂']
variable [Module R Mₗ₁] [Module R Mₗ₂] [Module R Mₗ₁'] [Module R Mₗ₂']
variable {B : Mₗ₁ →ₗ[R] Mₗ₂ →ₗ[R] M} (e₁ : Mₗ₁ ≃ₗ[R] Mₗ₁') (e₂ : Mₗ₂ ≃ₗ[R] Mₗ₂')
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/SesquilinearForm.lean | 659 | 667 | theorem SeparatingLeft.congr (h : B.SeparatingLeft) :
(e₁.arrowCongr (e₂.arrowCongr (LinearEquiv.refl R M)) B).SeparatingLeft := by |
intro x hx
rw [← e₁.symm.map_eq_zero_iff]
refine h (e₁.symm x) fun y ↦ ?_
specialize hx (e₂ y)
simp only [LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply,
LinearEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff] at hx
exact hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn, Antoine Labelle, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Path
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Push
#align_import combinatorics.quiver.symmetric from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"706d88f2b8fdfeb0b22796433d7a6c1a010af9f2"
/-!
## Symmetric quivers and arrow reversal
This file contains constructions related to symmetric quivers:
* `Symmetrify V` adds formal inverses to each arrow of `V`.
* `HasReverse` is the class of quivers where each arrow has an assigned formal inverse.
* `HasInvolutiveReverse` extends `HasReverse` by requiring that the reverse of the reverse
is equal to the original arrow.
* `Prefunctor.PreserveReverse` is the class of prefunctors mapping reverses to reverses.
* `Symmetrify.of`, `Symmetrify.lift`, and the associated lemmas witness the universal property
of `Symmetrify`.
-/
universe v u w v'
namespace Quiver
/-- A type synonym for the symmetrized quiver (with an arrow both ways for each original arrow).
NB: this does not work for `Prop`-valued quivers. It requires `[Quiver.{v+1} V]`. -/
-- Porting note: no hasNonemptyInstance linter yet
def Symmetrify (V : Type*) := V
#align quiver.symmetrify Quiver.Symmetrify
instance symmetrifyQuiver (V : Type u) [Quiver V] : Quiver (Symmetrify V) :=
⟨fun a b : V ↦ Sum (a ⟶ b) (b ⟶ a)⟩
variable (U V W : Type*) [Quiver.{u + 1} U] [Quiver.{v + 1} V] [Quiver.{w + 1} W]
/-- A quiver `HasReverse` if we can reverse an arrow `p` from `a` to `b` to get an arrow
`p.reverse` from `b` to `a`. -/
class HasReverse where
/-- the map which sends an arrow to its reverse -/
reverse' : ∀ {a b : V}, (a ⟶ b) → (b ⟶ a)
#align quiver.has_reverse Quiver.HasReverse
/-- Reverse the direction of an arrow. -/
def reverse {V} [Quiver.{v + 1} V] [HasReverse V] {a b : V} : (a ⟶ b) → (b ⟶ a) :=
HasReverse.reverse'
#align quiver.reverse Quiver.reverse
/-- A quiver `HasInvolutiveReverse` if reversing twice is the identity. -/
class HasInvolutiveReverse extends HasReverse V where
/-- `reverse` is involutive -/
inv' : ∀ {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b), reverse (reverse f) = f
#align quiver.has_involutive_reverse Quiver.HasInvolutiveReverse
variable {U V W}
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b) :
reverse (reverse f) = f := by apply h.inv'
#align quiver.reverse_reverse Quiver.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V}
(f g : a ⟶ b) : reverse f = reverse g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro h
simpa using congr_arg Quiver.reverse h
· rintro h
congr
#align quiver.reverse_inj Quiver.reverse_inj
theorem eq_reverse_iff [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b)
(g : b ⟶ a) : f = reverse g ↔ reverse f = g := by
rw [← reverse_inj, reverse_reverse]
#align quiver.eq_reverse_iff Quiver.eq_reverse_iff
section MapReverse
variable [HasReverse U] [HasReverse V] [HasReverse W]
/-- A prefunctor preserving reversal of arrows -/
class _root_.Prefunctor.MapReverse (φ : U ⥤q V) : Prop where
/-- The image of a reverse is the reverse of the image. -/
map_reverse' : ∀ {u v : U} (e : u ⟶ v), φ.map (reverse e) = reverse (φ.map e)
#align prefunctor.map_reverse Prefunctor.MapReverse
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prefunctor.map_reverse (φ : U ⥤q V) [φ.MapReverse]
{u v : U} (e : u ⟶ v) : φ.map (reverse e) = reverse (φ.map e) :=
Prefunctor.MapReverse.map_reverse' e
#align prefunctor.map_reverse' Prefunctor.map_reverse
instance _root_.Prefunctor.mapReverseComp
(φ : U ⥤q V) (ψ : V ⥤q W) [φ.MapReverse] [ψ.MapReverse] :
(φ ⋙q ψ).MapReverse where
map_reverse' e := by
simp only [Prefunctor.comp_map, Prefunctor.MapReverse.map_reverse']
#align prefunctor.map_reverse_comp Prefunctor.mapReverseComp
instance _root_.Prefunctor.mapReverseId :
(Prefunctor.id U).MapReverse where
map_reverse' _ := rfl
#align prefunctor.map_reverse_id Prefunctor.mapReverseId
end MapReverse
instance : HasReverse (Symmetrify V) :=
⟨fun e => e.swap⟩
instance :
HasInvolutiveReverse
(Symmetrify V) where
toHasReverse := ⟨fun e ↦ e.swap⟩
inv' e := congr_fun Sum.swap_swap_eq e
@[simp]
theorem symmetrify_reverse {a b : Symmetrify V} (e : a ⟶ b) : reverse e = e.swap :=
rfl
#align quiver.symmetrify_reverse Quiver.symmetrify_reverse
section Paths
/-- Shorthand for the "forward" arrow corresponding to `f` in `symmetrify V` -/
abbrev Hom.toPos {X Y : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Quiver.symmetrifyQuiver V).Hom X Y :=
Sum.inl f
#align quiver.hom.to_pos Quiver.Hom.toPos
/-- Shorthand for the "backward" arrow corresponding to `f` in `symmetrify V` -/
abbrev Hom.toNeg {X Y : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Quiver.symmetrifyQuiver V).Hom Y X :=
Sum.inr f
#align quiver.hom.to_neg Quiver.Hom.toNeg
/-- Reverse the direction of a path. -/
@[simp]
def Path.reverse [HasReverse V] {a : V} : ∀ {b}, Path a b → Path b a
| _, Path.nil => Path.nil
| _, Path.cons p e => (Quiver.reverse e).toPath.comp p.reverse
#align quiver.path.reverse Quiver.Path.reverse
@[simp]
theorem Path.reverse_toPath [HasReverse V] {a b : V} (f : a ⟶ b) :
f.toPath.reverse = (Quiver.reverse f).toPath :=
rfl
#align quiver.path.reverse_to_path Quiver.Path.reverse_toPath
@[simp]
theorem Path.reverse_comp [HasReverse V] {a b c : V} (p : Path a b) (q : Path b c) :
(p.comp q).reverse = q.reverse.comp p.reverse := by
induction' q with _ _ _ _ h
· simp
· simp [h]
#align quiver.path.reverse_comp Quiver.Path.reverse_comp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Quiver/Symmetric.lean | 158 | 163 | theorem Path.reverse_reverse [h : HasInvolutiveReverse V] {a b : V} (p : Path a b) :
p.reverse.reverse = p := by |
induction' p with _ _ _ _ h
· simp
· rw [Path.reverse, Path.reverse_comp, h, Path.reverse_toPath, Quiver.reverse_reverse]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import topology.continuous_on from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file defines relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
and proves their basic properties, including the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
#align nhds_bind_nhds_within nhds_bind_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
#align eventually_nhds_nhds_within eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align eventually_nhds_within_iff eventually_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
#align frequently_nhds_within_iff frequently_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
#align mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
#align eventually_nhds_within_nhds_within eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
#align nhds_within_eq nhdsWithin_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align nhds_within_univ nhdsWithin_univ
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set α} {a : α} (h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s)
(t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
#align nhds_within_has_basis nhdsWithin_hasBasis
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
#align nhds_within_basis_open nhdsWithin_basis_open
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_compl diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_diff diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
#align nhds_of_nhds_within_of_nhds nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually_eq mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
#align nhds_within_eq_iff_eventually_eq nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
#align nhds_within_le_iff nhdsWithin_le_iff
-- Porting note: golfed, dropped an unneeded assumption
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced' preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced'ₓ
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
#align mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
#align self_mem_nhds_within self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
#align eventually_mem_nhds_within eventually_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
#align inter_mem_nhds_within inter_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_mono (a : α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝[t] a :=
inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr h)
#align nhds_within_mono nhdsWithin_mono
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
#align pure_le_nhds_within pure_le_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
#align mem_of_mem_nhds_within mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds_within Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
#align tendsto_const_nhds_within tendsto_const_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
#align nhds_within_restrict'' nhdsWithin_restrict''
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
#align nhds_within_restrict' nhdsWithin_restrict'
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
#align nhds_within_restrict nhdsWithin_restrict
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
#align nhds_within_le_of_mem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
#align nhds_within_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within' nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin'
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds nhdsWithin_eq_nhds
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
#align is_open.nhds_within_eq IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced preimage_nhds_within_coinduced
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
#align nhds_within_empty nhdsWithin_empty
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
#align nhds_within_union nhdsWithin_union
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a :=
Set.Finite.induction_on hI (by simp) fun _ _ hT ↦ by
simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
#align nhds_within_bUnion nhdsWithin_biUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
#align nhds_within_sUnion nhdsWithin_sUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
#align nhds_within_Union nhdsWithin_iUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
#align nhds_within_inter nhdsWithin_inter
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
#align nhds_within_inter' nhdsWithin_inter'
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem' nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem'
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
#align nhds_within_singleton nhdsWithin_singleton
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
#align nhds_within_insert nhdsWithin_insert
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
#align mem_nhds_within_insert mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
#align insert_mem_nhds_iff insert_mem_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align nhds_within_compl_singleton_sup_pure nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure
theorem nhdsWithin_prod {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
#align nhds_within_prod nhdsWithin_prod
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq' nhdsWithin_pi_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq nhdsWithin_pi_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
#align nhds_within_pi_univ_eq nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : 𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq_bot nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : (𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_ne_bot nhdsWithin_pi_neBot
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
#align filter.tendsto.piecewise_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
#align filter.tendsto.if_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
#align map_nhds_within map_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
#align eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhds_within eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhds_within tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
#align nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
#align is_closed.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
#align dense_range.nhds_within_ne_bot DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
#align mem_closure_pi mem_closure_pi
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
#align closure_pi_set closure_pi_set
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
#align dense_pi dense_pi
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_iff eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_of_eq_on eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
#align set.eq_on.eventually_eq_nhds_within Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
#align tendsto_nhds_within_congr tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_forall eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_range tendsto_nhdsWithin_range
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
#align filter.eventually_eq.eq_of_nhds_within Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_eventually_nhds eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
#align mem_nhds_within_subtype mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
#align nhds_within_subtype nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
#align nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_coe nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
#align mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhds_within mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
#align continuous_on.continuous_within_at ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_within_at_univ continuousWithinAt_univ
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
#align continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α} {y : β}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at *
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, Prod.map, nhds_prod_eq]
exact hf.prod_map hg
#align continuous_within_at.prod_map ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) {b | (x.1, b) ∈ s} x.2 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) {a | (a, x.2) ∈ s} x.1 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, prod_pure,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) x.2 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) x.1 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ a, ContinuousOn (f ⟨a, ·⟩) {b | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left]; rfl
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b, ContinuousOn (f ⟨·, b⟩) {a | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right]; apply forall_swap
/-- If a function `f a b` is such that `y ↦ f a b` is continuous for all `a`, and `a` lives in a
discrete space, then `f` is continuous, and vice versa. -/
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ a, Continuous (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Continuous (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ a, IsOpenMap (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod, map_map]
rfl
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ b, IsOpenMap (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, forall_swap (α := α) (β := β), nhds_prod_eq,
nhds_discrete, prod_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem continuousWithinAt_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} {x : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => f y i) s x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
#align continuous_within_at_pi continuousWithinAt_pi
theorem continuousOn_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} : ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (fun y => f y i) s :=
⟨fun h i x hx => tendsto_pi_nhds.1 (h x hx) i, fun h x hx => tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun i => h i x hx⟩
#align continuous_on_pi continuousOn_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_pi' {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn (fun y => f y i) s) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
continuousOn_pi.2 hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : α → π i} {a : α} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) {g : α → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s a) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) s a :=
hf.tendsto.fin_insertNth i hg
#align continuous_within_at.fin_insert_nth ContinuousWithinAt.fin_insertNth
nonrec theorem ContinuousOn.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : α → π i} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {g : α → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) s := fun a ha =>
(hf a ha).fin_insertNth i (hg a ha)
#align continuous_on.fin_insert_nth ContinuousOn.fin_insertNth
theorem continuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
#align continuous_on_iff continuousOn_iff
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
#align continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
-- Porting note: 2 new lemmas
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : MapsTo f s t) : Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
#align continuous_on_iff' continuousOn_iff'
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
#align continuous_on.mono_dom ContinuousOn.mono_dom
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
#align continuous_on.mono_rng ContinuousOn.mono_rng
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
#align continuous_on_iff_is_closed continuousOn_iff_isClosed
theorem ContinuousOn.prod_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g t) : ContinuousOn (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map (hf x hx) (hg y hy)
#align continuous_on.prod_map ContinuousOn.prod_map
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
#align continuous_of_cover_nhds continuous_of_cover_nhds
theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
#align continuous_on_empty continuousOn_empty
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
#align continuous_on_singleton continuousOn_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
#align set.subsingleton.continuous_on Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap {x : α} {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
#align nhds_within_le_comap nhdsWithin_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_nhdsWithin_range {α} (f : α → β) (y : β) : comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) :=
comap_inf_principal_range
#align comap_nhds_within_range comap_nhdsWithin_range
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
#align continuous_within_at.mono ContinuousWithinAt.mono
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
#align continuous_within_at.mono_of_mem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_nhds {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, h]
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 751 | 753 | theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by |
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Free
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.CofilteredLimit
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Product
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Algebra
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Bool.Lemmas
/-!
# Nöbeling's theorem
This file proves Nöbeling's theorem.
## Main result
* `LocallyConstant.freeOfProfinite`: Nöbeling's theorem.
For `S : Profinite`, the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant S ℤ` is free.
## Proof idea
We follow the proof of theorem 5.4 in [scholze2019condensed], in which the idea is to embed `S` in
a product of `I` copies of `Bool` for some sufficiently large `I`, and then to choose a
well-ordering on `I` and use ordinal induction over that well-order. Here we can let `I` be
the set of clopen subsets of `S` since `S` is totally separated.
The above means it suffices to prove the following statement: For a closed subset `C` of `I → Bool`,
the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant C ℤ` is free.
For `i : I`, let `e C i : LocallyConstant C ℤ` denote the map `fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)`.
The basis will consist of products `e C iᵣ * ⋯ * e C i₁` with `iᵣ > ⋯ > i₁` which cannot be written
as linear combinations of lexicographically smaller products. We call this set `GoodProducts C`
What is proved by ordinal induction is that this set is linearly independent. The fact that it
spans can be proved directly.
## References
- [scholze2019condensed], Theorem 5.4.
-/
universe u
namespace Profinite
namespace NobelingProof
variable {I : Type u} [LinearOrder I] [IsWellOrder I (·<·)] (C : Set (I → Bool))
open Profinite ContinuousMap CategoryTheory Limits Opposite Submodule
section Projections
/-!
## Projection maps
The purpose of this section is twofold.
Firstly, in the proof that the set `GoodProducts C` spans the whole module `LocallyConstant C ℤ`,
we need to project `C` down to finite discrete subsets and write `C` as a cofiltered limit of those.
Secondly, in the inductive argument, we need to project `C` down to "smaller" sets satisfying the
inductive hypothesis.
In this section we define the relevant projection maps and prove some compatibility results.
### Main definitions
* Let `J : I → Prop`. Then `Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)` is the projection mapping everything
that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`.
* The image of `C` under `Proj J` is denoted `π C J` and the corresponding map `C → π C J` is called
`ProjRestrict`. If `J` implies `K` we have a map `ProjRestricts : π C K → π C J`.
* `spanCone_isLimit` establishes that when `C` is compact, it can be written as a limit of its
images under the maps `Proj (· ∈ s)` where `s : Finset I`.
-/
variable (J K L : I → Prop) [∀ i, Decidable (J i)] [∀ i, Decidable (K i)] [∀ i, Decidable (L i)]
/--
The projection mapping everything that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`
-/
def Proj : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool) :=
fun c i ↦ if J i then c i else false
@[simp]
theorem continuous_proj :
Continuous (Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by
dsimp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Proj]
apply continuous_pi
intro i
split
· apply continuous_apply
· apply continuous_const
/-- The image of `Proj π J` -/
def π : Set (I → Bool) := (Proj J) '' C
/-- The restriction of `Proj π J` to a subset, mapping to its image. -/
@[simps!]
def ProjRestrict : C → π C J :=
Set.MapsTo.restrict (Proj J) _ _ (Set.mapsTo_image _ _)
@[simp]
theorem continuous_projRestrict : Continuous (ProjRestrict C J) :=
Continuous.restrict _ (continuous_proj _)
theorem proj_eq_self {x : I → Bool} (h : ∀ i, x i ≠ false → J i) : Proj J x = x := by
ext i
simp only [Proj, ite_eq_left_iff]
contrapose!
simpa only [ne_comm] using h i
theorem proj_prop_eq_self (hh : ∀ i x, x ∈ C → x i ≠ false → J i) : π C J = C := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, h⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨x, h, ?_⟩⟩
· rwa [← h, proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · y hy)
· rw [proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · x h)
theorem proj_comp_of_subset (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : (Proj J ∘ Proj K) =
(Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by
ext x i; dsimp [Proj]; aesop
theorem proj_eq_of_subset (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : π (π C K) J = π C J := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨y, ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨z, hz, (?_ : _ = (Proj J ∘ Proj K) z)⟩
rw [proj_comp_of_subset J K h]
· obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := h
dsimp [π]
rw [← Set.image_comp]
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
rw [proj_comp_of_subset J K h]
variable {J K L}
/-- A variant of `ProjRestrict` with domain of the form `π C K` -/
@[simps!]
def ProjRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : π C K → π C J :=
Homeomorph.setCongr (proj_eq_of_subset C J K h) ∘ ProjRestrict (π C K) J
@[simp]
theorem continuous_projRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : Continuous (ProjRestricts C h) :=
Continuous.comp (Homeomorph.continuous _) (continuous_projRestrict _ _)
theorem surjective_projRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : Function.Surjective (ProjRestricts C h) :=
(Homeomorph.surjective _).comp (Set.surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _)
variable (J) in
theorem projRestricts_eq_id : ProjRestricts C (fun i (h : J i) ↦ h) = id := by
ext ⟨x, y, hy, rfl⟩ i
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [π, Proj, ProjRestricts_coe, id_eq, if_true]
theorem projRestricts_eq_comp (hJK : ∀ i, J i → K i) (hKL : ∀ i, K i → L i) :
ProjRestricts C hJK ∘ ProjRestricts C hKL = ProjRestricts C (fun i ↦ hKL i ∘ hJK i) := by
ext x i
simp only [π, Proj, Function.comp_apply, ProjRestricts_coe]
aesop
theorem projRestricts_comp_projRestrict (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) :
ProjRestricts C h ∘ ProjRestrict C K = ProjRestrict C J := by
ext x i
simp only [π, Proj, Function.comp_apply, ProjRestricts_coe, ProjRestrict_coe]
aesop
variable (J)
/-- The objectwise map in the isomorphism `spanFunctor ≅ Profinite.indexFunctor`. -/
def iso_map : C(π C J, (IndexFunctor.obj C J)) :=
⟨fun x ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ x.val i.val, by
rcases x with ⟨x, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp [precomp, Proj, hi]⟩, by
refine Continuous.subtype_mk (continuous_pi fun i ↦ ?_) _
exact (continuous_apply i.val).comp continuous_subtype_val⟩
lemma iso_map_bijective : Function.Bijective (iso_map C J) := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_, fun a ↦ ?_⟩
· ext i
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h
by_cases hi : J i
· exact congr_fun h ⟨i, hi⟩
· rcases a with ⟨_, c, hc, rfl⟩
rcases b with ⟨_, d, hd, rfl⟩
simp only [Proj, if_neg hi]
· refine ⟨⟨fun i ↦ if hi : J i then a.val ⟨i, hi⟩ else false, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rcases a with ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
· ext i
exact dif_pos i.prop
variable {C} (hC : IsCompact C)
/--
For a given compact subset `C` of `I → Bool`, `spanFunctor` is the functor from the poset of finsets
of `I` to `Profinite`, sending a finite subset set `J` to the image of `C` under the projection
`Proj J`.
-/
noncomputable
def spanFunctor [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
(Finset I)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Profinite.{u} where
obj s := @Profinite.of (π C (· ∈ (unop s))) _
(by rw [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]; exact hC.image (continuous_proj _)) _ _
map h := ⟨(ProjRestricts C (leOfHom h.unop)), continuous_projRestricts _ _⟩
map_id J := by simp only [projRestricts_eq_id C (· ∈ (unop J))]; rfl
map_comp _ _ := by dsimp; congr; dsimp; rw [projRestricts_eq_comp]
/-- The limit cone on `spanFunctor` with point `C`. -/
noncomputable
def spanCone [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] : Cone (spanFunctor hC) where
pt := @Profinite.of C _ (by rwa [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]) _ _
π :=
{ app := fun s ↦ ⟨ProjRestrict C (· ∈ unop s), continuous_projRestrict _ _⟩
naturality := by
intro X Y h
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, Homeomorph.setCongr, Homeomorph.homeomorph_mk_coe,
Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, ← projRestricts_comp_projRestrict C
(leOfHom h.unop)]
rfl }
/-- `spanCone` is a limit cone. -/
noncomputable
def spanCone_isLimit [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit (spanCone hC) := by
refine (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (NatIso.ofComponents
(fun s ↦ (Profinite.isoOfBijective _ (iso_map_bijective C (· ∈ unop s)))) ?_) (spanCone hC))
(IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (indexCone_isLimit hC) (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_))
· intro ⟨s⟩ ⟨t⟩ ⟨⟨⟨f⟩⟩⟩
ext x
have : iso_map C (· ∈ t) ∘ ProjRestricts C f = IndexFunctor.map C f ∘ iso_map C (· ∈ s) := by
ext _ i; exact dif_pos i.prop
exact congr_fun this x
· intro ⟨s⟩
ext x
have : iso_map C (· ∈ s) ∘ ProjRestrict C (· ∈ s) = IndexFunctor.π_app C (· ∈ s) := by
ext _ i; exact dif_pos i.prop
erw [← this]
rfl
end Projections
section Products
/-!
## Defining the basis
Our proposed basis consists of products `e C iᵣ * ⋯ * e C i₁` with `iᵣ > ⋯ > i₁` which cannot be
written as linear combinations of lexicographically smaller products. See below for the definition
of `e`.
### Main definitions
* For `i : I`, we let `e C i : LocallyConstant C ℤ` denote the map
`fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)`.
* `Products I` is the type of lists of decreasing elements of `I`, so a typical element is
`[i₁, i₂,..., iᵣ]` with `i₁ > i₂ > ... > iᵣ`.
* `Products.eval C` is the `C`-evaluation of a list. It takes a term `[i₁, i₂,..., iᵣ] : Products I`
and returns the actual product `e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : LocallyConstant C ℤ`.
* `GoodProducts C` is the set of `Products I` such that their `C`-evaluation cannot be written as
a linear combination of evaluations of lexicographically smaller lists.
### Main results
* `Products.evalFacProp` and `Products.evalFacProps` establish the fact that `Products.eval`
interacts nicely with the projection maps from the previous section.
* `GoodProducts.span_iff_products`: the good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` iff all the
products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ`.
-/
/--
`e C i` is the locally constant map from `C : Set (I → Bool)` to `ℤ` sending `f` to 1 if
`f.val i = true`, and 0 otherwise.
-/
def e (i : I) : LocallyConstant C ℤ where
toFun := fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)
isLocallyConstant := by
rw [IsLocallyConstant.iff_continuous]
exact (continuous_of_discreteTopology (f := fun (a : Bool) ↦ (if a then (1 : ℤ) else 0))).comp
((continuous_apply i).comp continuous_subtype_val)
/--
`Products I` is the type of lists of decreasing elements of `I`, so a typical element is
`[i₁, i₂, ...]` with `i₁ > i₂ > ...`. We order `Products I` lexicographically, so `[] < [i₁, ...]`,
and `[i₁, i₂, ...] < [j₁, j₂, ...]` if either `i₁ < j₁`, or `i₁ = j₁` and `[i₂, ...] < [j₂, ...]`.
Terms `m = [i₁, i₂, ..., iᵣ]` of this type will be used to represent products of the form
`e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : LocallyConstant C ℤ` . The function associated to `m` is `m.eval`.
-/
def Products (I : Type*) [LinearOrder I] := {l : List I // l.Chain' (·>·)}
namespace Products
instance : LinearOrder (Products I) :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrder {l : List I // l.Chain' (·>·)})
@[simp]
theorem lt_iff_lex_lt (l m : Products I) : l < m ↔ List.Lex (·<·) l.val m.val := by
cases l; cases m; rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk]; exact Iff.rfl
instance : IsWellFounded (Products I) (·<·) := by
have : (· < · : Products I → _ → _) = (fun l m ↦ List.Lex (·<·) l.val m.val) := by
ext; exact lt_iff_lex_lt _ _
rw [this]
dsimp [Products]
rw [(by rfl : (·>· : I → _) = flip (·<·))]
infer_instance
/-- The evaluation `e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : C → ℤ` of a formal product `[i₁, i₂, ..., iᵣ]`. -/
def eval (l : Products I) := (l.1.map (e C)).prod
/--
The predicate on products which we prove picks out a basis of `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. We call such a
product "good".
-/
def isGood (l : Products I) : Prop :=
l.eval C ∉ Submodule.span ℤ ((Products.eval C) '' {m | m < l})
theorem rel_head!_of_mem [Inhabited I] {i : I} {l : Products I} (hi : i ∈ l.val) :
i ≤ l.val.head! :=
List.Sorted.le_head! (List.chain'_iff_pairwise.mp l.prop) hi
theorem head!_le_of_lt [Inhabited I] {q l : Products I} (h : q < l) (hq : q.val ≠ []) :
q.val.head! ≤ l.val.head! :=
List.head!_le_of_lt l.val q.val h hq
end Products
/-- The set of good products. -/
def GoodProducts := {l : Products I | l.isGood C}
namespace GoodProducts
/-- Evaluation of good products. -/
def eval (l : {l : Products I // l.isGood C}) : LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
Products.eval C l.1
theorem injective : Function.Injective (eval C) := by
intro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h
dsimp [eval] at h
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (h'|rfl|h')
· exfalso; apply hb; rw [← h]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨a, h', rfl⟩
· rfl
· exfalso; apply ha; rw [h]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨b, ⟨h',rfl⟩⟩
/-- The image of the good products in the module `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. -/
def range := Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C)
/-- The type of good products is equivalent to its image. -/
noncomputable
def equiv_range : GoodProducts C ≃ range C :=
Equiv.ofInjective (eval C) (injective C)
theorem equiv_toFun_eq_eval : (equiv_range C).toFun = Set.rangeFactorization (eval C) := rfl
theorem linearIndependent_iff_range : LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval C) ↔
LinearIndependent ℤ (fun (p : range C) ↦ p.1) := by
rw [← @Set.rangeFactorization_eq _ _ (GoodProducts.eval C), ← equiv_toFun_eq_eval C]
exact linearIndependent_equiv (equiv_range C)
end GoodProducts
namespace Products
theorem eval_eq (l : Products I) (x : C) :
l.eval C x = if ∀ i, i ∈ l.val → (x.val i = true) then 1 else 0 := by
change LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x (l.eval C) = _
rw [eval, map_list_prod]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [List.map_map]
apply List.prod_eq_one
simp only [List.mem_map, Function.comp_apply]
rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact if_pos (h i hi)
· simp only [List.map_map, List.prod_eq_zero_iff, List.mem_map, Function.comp_apply]
push_neg at h
convert h with i
dsimp [LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom, e]
simp only [ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero]
theorem evalFacProp {l : Products I} (J : I → Prop)
(h : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)] :
l.eval (π C J) ∘ ProjRestrict C J = l.eval C := by
ext x
dsimp [ProjRestrict]
rw [Products.eval_eq, Products.eval_eq]
congr
apply forall_congr; intro i
apply forall_congr; intro hi
simp [h i hi, Proj]
theorem evalFacProps {l : Products I} (J K : I → Prop)
(h : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)] [∀ j, Decidable (K j)]
(hJK : ∀ i, J i → K i) :
l.eval (π C J) ∘ ProjRestricts C hJK = l.eval (π C K) := by
have : l.eval (π C J) ∘ Homeomorph.setCongr (proj_eq_of_subset C J K hJK) =
l.eval (π (π C K) J) := by
ext; simp [Homeomorph.setCongr, Products.eval_eq]
rw [ProjRestricts, ← Function.comp.assoc, this, ← evalFacProp (π C K) J h]
theorem prop_of_isGood {l : Products I} (J : I → Prop) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)]
(h : l.isGood (π C J)) : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a := by
intro i hi
by_contra h'
apply h
suffices eval (π C J) l = 0 by
rw [this]
exact Submodule.zero_mem _
ext ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
rw [eval_eq, if_neg fun h ↦ ?_, LocallyConstant.zero_apply]
simpa [Proj, h'] using h i hi
end Products
/-- The good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` if and only all the products do. -/
theorem GoodProducts.span_iff_products : ⊤ ≤ span ℤ (Set.range (eval C)) ↔
⊤ ≤ span ℤ (Set.range (Products.eval C)) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ le_trans h (span_mono (fun a ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b.val, hb⟩)), fun h ↦ le_trans h ?_⟩
rw [span_le]
rintro f ⟨l, rfl⟩
let L : Products I → Prop := fun m ↦ m.eval C ∈ span ℤ (Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C))
suffices L l by assumption
apply IsWellFounded.induction (·<· : Products I → Products I → Prop)
intro l h
dsimp
by_cases hl : l.isGood C
· apply subset_span
exact ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, rfl⟩
· simp only [Products.isGood, not_not] at hl
suffices Products.eval C '' {m | m < l} ⊆ span ℤ (Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C)) by
rw [← span_le] at this
exact this hl
rintro a ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩
exact h m hm
end Products
section Span
/-!
## The good products span
Most of the argument is developing an API for `π C (· ∈ s)` when `s : Finset I`; then the image
of `C` is finite with the discrete topology. In this case, there is a direct argument that the good
products span. The general result is deduced from this.
### Main theorems
* `GoodProducts.spanFin` : The good products span the locally constant functions on `π C (· ∈ s)`
if `s` is finite.
* `GoodProducts.span` : The good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` for every closed subset `C`.
-/
section Fin
variable (s : Finset I)
/-- The `ℤ`-linear map induced by precomposition of the projection `C → π C (· ∈ s)`. -/
noncomputable
def πJ : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ →ₗ[ℤ] LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
LocallyConstant.comapₗ ℤ ⟨_, (continuous_projRestrict C (· ∈ s))⟩
theorem eval_eq_πJ (l : Products I) (hl : l.isGood (π C (· ∈ s))) :
l.eval C = πJ C s (l.eval (π C (· ∈ s))) := by
ext f
simp only [πJ, LocallyConstant.comapₗ, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
(continuous_projRestrict C (· ∈ s)), LocallyConstant.coe_comap, Function.comp_apply]
exact (congr_fun (Products.evalFacProp C (· ∈ s) (Products.prop_of_isGood C (· ∈ s) hl)) _).symm
/-- `π C (· ∈ s)` is finite for a finite set `s`. -/
noncomputable
instance : Fintype (π C (· ∈ s)) := by
let f : π C (· ∈ s) → (s → Bool) := fun x j ↦ x.val j.val
refine Fintype.ofInjective f ?_
intro ⟨_, x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩ h
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· exact congrFun h ⟨i, hi⟩
· simp only [Proj, if_neg hi]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The Kronecker delta as a locally constant map from `π C (· ∈ s)` to `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable
def spanFinBasis (x : π C (· ∈ s)) : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ where
toFun := fun y ↦ if y = x then 1 else 0
isLocallyConstant :=
haveI : DiscreteTopology (π C (· ∈ s)) := discrete_of_t1_of_finite
IsLocallyConstant.of_discrete _
open scoped Classical in
theorem spanFinBasis.span : ⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (spanFinBasis C s)) := by
intro f _
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp]
use Finsupp.onFinset (Finset.univ) f.toFun (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _)
ext x
change LocallyConstant.evalₗ ℤ x _ = _
simp only [zsmul_eq_mul, map_finsupp_sum, LocallyConstant.evalₗ_apply,
LocallyConstant.coe_mul, Pi.mul_apply, spanFinBasis, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, mul_ite, mul_one,
mul_zero, Finsupp.sum_ite_eq, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, ite_not]
split_ifs with h <;> [exact h.symm; rfl]
/--
A certain explicit list of locally constant maps. The theorem `factors_prod_eq_basis` shows that the
product of the elements in this list is the delta function `spanFinBasis C s x`.
-/
def factors (x : π C (· ∈ s)) : List (LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ) :=
List.map (fun i ↦ if x.val i = true then e (π C (· ∈ s)) i else (1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) i)))
(s.sort (·≥·))
theorem list_prod_apply (x : C) (l : List (LocallyConstant C ℤ)) :
l.prod x = (l.map (LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x)).prod := by
rw [← map_list_prod (LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x) l]
rfl
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis_of_eq {x y : (π C fun x ↦ x ∈ s)} (h : y = x) :
(factors C s x).prod y = 1 := by
rw [list_prod_apply (π C (· ∈ s)) y _]
apply List.prod_eq_one
simp only [h, List.mem_map, LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom, factors]
rintro _ ⟨a, ⟨b, _, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with hh
· rw [e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_pos hh]
· rw [LocallyConstant.sub_apply, e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_neg hh]
simp only [LocallyConstant.toFun_eq_coe, LocallyConstant.coe_one, Pi.one_apply, sub_zero]
theorem e_mem_of_eq_true {x : (π C (· ∈ s))} {a : I} (hx : x.val a = true) :
e (π C (· ∈ s)) a ∈ factors C s x := by
rcases x with ⟨_, z, hz, rfl⟩
simp only [factors, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_sort]
refine ⟨a, ?_, if_pos hx⟩
aesop (add simp Proj)
theorem one_sub_e_mem_of_false {x y : (π C (· ∈ s))} {a : I} (ha : y.val a = true)
(hx : x.val a = false) : 1 - e (π C (· ∈ s)) a ∈ factors C s x := by
simp only [factors, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_sort]
use a
simp only [hx, ite_false, and_true]
rcases y with ⟨_, z, hz, rfl⟩
aesop (add simp Proj)
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis_of_ne {x y : (π C (· ∈ s))} (h : y ≠ x) :
(factors C s x).prod y = 0 := by
rw [list_prod_apply (π C (· ∈ s)) y _]
apply List.prod_eq_zero
simp only [List.mem_map]
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, y.val a ≠ x.val a := by contrapose! h; ext; apply h
cases hx : x.val a
· rw [hx, ne_eq, Bool.not_eq_false] at ha
refine ⟨1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a), ⟨one_sub_e_mem_of_false _ _ ha hx, ?_⟩⟩
rw [e, LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom_apply, LocallyConstant.sub_apply,
LocallyConstant.coe_one, Pi.one_apply, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_pos ha, sub_self]
· refine ⟨e (π C (· ∈ s)) a, ⟨e_mem_of_eq_true _ _ hx, ?_⟩⟩
rw [hx] at ha
rw [LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom_apply, e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_neg ha]
/-- If `s` is finite, the product of the elements of the list `factors C s x`
is the delta function at `x`. -/
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis (x : π C (· ∈ s)) :
(factors C s x).prod = spanFinBasis C s x := by
ext y
dsimp [spanFinBasis]
split_ifs with h <;> [exact factors_prod_eq_basis_of_eq _ _ h;
exact factors_prod_eq_basis_of_ne _ _ h]
theorem GoodProducts.finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval {a : I} {as : List I}
(ha : List.Chain' (· > ·) (a :: as)) {c : Products I →₀ ℤ}
(hc : (c.support : Set (Products I)) ⊆ {m | m.val ≤ as}) :
(Finsupp.sum c fun a_1 b ↦ e (π C (· ∈ s)) a * b • Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s)) a_1) ∈
Submodule.span ℤ (Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s)) '' {m | m.val ≤ a :: as}) := by
apply Submodule.finsupp_sum_mem
intro m hm
have hsm := (LinearMap.mulLeft ℤ (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a)).map_smul
dsimp at hsm
rw [hsm]
apply Submodule.smul_mem
apply Submodule.subset_span
have hmas : m.val ≤ as := by
apply hc
simpa only [Finset.mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] using hm
refine ⟨⟨a :: m.val, ha.cons_of_le m.prop hmas⟩, ⟨List.cons_le_cons a hmas, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [Products.eval, List.map, List.prod_cons]
/-- If `s` is a finite subset of `I`, then the good products span. -/
theorem GoodProducts.spanFin : ⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (eval (π C (· ∈ s)))) := by
rw [span_iff_products]
refine le_trans (spanFinBasis.span C s) ?_
rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [← factors_prod_eq_basis]
let l := s.sort (·≥·)
dsimp [factors]
suffices l.Chain' (·>·) → (l.map (fun i ↦ if x.val i = true then e (π C (· ∈ s)) i
else (1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) i)))).prod ∈
Submodule.span ℤ ((Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s))) '' {m | m.val ≤ l}) from
Submodule.span_mono (Set.image_subset_range _ _) (this (Finset.sort_sorted_gt _).chain')
induction l with
| nil =>
intro _
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨⟨[], List.chain'_nil⟩,⟨Or.inl rfl, rfl⟩⟩
| cons a as ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
intro ha
specialize ih (by rw [List.chain'_cons'] at ha; exact ha.2)
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at ih
simp only [Finsupp.mem_supported, Finsupp.total_apply] at ih
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := ih
rw [← hc']; clear hc'
have hmap := fun g ↦ map_finsupp_sum (LinearMap.mulLeft ℤ (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a)) c g
dsimp at hmap ⊢
split_ifs
· rw [hmap]
exact finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval _ _ ha hc
· ring_nf
rw [hmap]
apply Submodule.add_mem
· apply Submodule.neg_mem
exact finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval _ _ ha hc
· apply Submodule.finsupp_sum_mem
intro m hm
apply Submodule.smul_mem
apply Submodule.subset_span
refine ⟨m, ⟨?_, rfl⟩⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
have hmas : m.val ≤ as :=
hc (by simpa only [Finset.mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] using hm)
refine le_trans hmas ?_
cases as with
| nil => exact (List.nil_lt_cons a []).le
| cons b bs =>
apply le_of_lt
rw [List.chain'_cons] at ha
have hlex := List.lt.head bs (b :: bs) ha.1
exact (List.lt_iff_lex_lt _ _).mp hlex
end Fin
theorem fin_comap_jointlySurjective
(hC : IsClosed C)
(f : LocallyConstant C ℤ) : ∃ (s : Finset I)
(g : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ), f = g.comap ⟨(ProjRestrict C (· ∈ s)),
continuous_projRestrict _ _⟩ := by
obtain ⟨J, g, h⟩ := @Profinite.exists_locallyConstant.{0, u, u} (Finset I)ᵒᵖ _ _ _
(spanCone hC.isCompact) ℤ
(spanCone_isLimit hC.isCompact) f
exact ⟨(Opposite.unop J), g, h⟩
/-- The good products span all of `LocallyConstant C ℤ` if `C` is closed. -/
theorem GoodProducts.span (hC : IsClosed C) :
⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (eval C)) := by
rw [span_iff_products]
intro f _
obtain ⟨K, f', rfl⟩ : ∃ K f', f = πJ C K f' := fin_comap_jointlySurjective C hC f
refine Submodule.span_mono ?_ <| Submodule.apply_mem_span_image_of_mem_span (πJ C K) <|
spanFin C K (Submodule.mem_top : f' ∈ ⊤)
rintro l ⟨y, ⟨m, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨m.val, eval_eq_πJ C K m.val m.prop⟩
end Span
section Ordinal
/-!
## Relating elements of the well-order `I` with ordinals
We choose a well-ordering on `I`. This amounts to regarding `I` as an ordinal, and as such it
can be regarded as the set of all strictly smaller ordinals, allowing to apply ordinal induction.
### Main definitions
* `ord I i` is the term `i` of `I` regarded as an ordinal.
* `term I ho` is a sufficiently small ordinal regarded as a term of `I`.
* `contained C o` is a predicate saying that `C` is "small" enough in relation to the ordinal `o`
to satisfy the inductive hypothesis.
* `P I` is the predicate on ordinals about linear independence of good products, which the rest of
this file is spent on proving by induction.
-/
variable (I)
/-- A term of `I` regarded as an ordinal. -/
def ord (i : I) : Ordinal := Ordinal.typein ((·<·) : I → I → Prop) i
/-- An ordinal regarded as a term of `I`. -/
noncomputable
def term {o : Ordinal} (ho : o < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) : I :=
Ordinal.enum ((·<·) : I → I → Prop) o ho
variable {I}
theorem term_ord_aux {i : I} (ho : ord I i < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) :
term I ho = i := by
simp only [term, ord, Ordinal.enum_typein]
@[simp]
theorem ord_term_aux {o : Ordinal} (ho : o < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) :
ord I (term I ho) = o := by
simp only [ord, term, Ordinal.typein_enum]
theorem ord_term {o : Ordinal} (ho : o < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) (i : I) :
ord I i = o ↔ term I ho = i := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· subst h
exact term_ord_aux ho
· subst h
exact ord_term_aux ho
/-- A predicate saying that `C` is "small" enough to satisfy the inductive hypothesis. -/
def contained (o : Ordinal) : Prop := ∀ f, f ∈ C → ∀ (i : I), f i = true → ord I i < o
variable (I) in
/--
The predicate on ordinals which we prove by induction, see `GoodProducts.P0`,
`GoodProducts.Plimit` and `GoodProducts.linearIndependentAux` in the section `Induction` below
-/
def P (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≤ Ordinal.type (·<· : I → I → Prop) →
(∀ (C : Set (I → Bool)), IsClosed C → contained C o →
LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval C))
theorem Products.prop_of_isGood_of_contained {l : Products I} (o : Ordinal) (h : l.isGood C)
(hsC : contained C o) (i : I) (hi : i ∈ l.val) : ord I i < o := by
by_contra h'
apply h
suffices eval C l = 0 by simp [this, Submodule.zero_mem]
ext x
simp only [eval_eq, LocallyConstant.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero]
contrapose! h'
exact hsC x.val x.prop i (h'.1 i hi)
end Ordinal
section Zero
/-!
## The zero case of the induction
In this case, we have `contained C 0` which means that `C` is either empty or a singleton.
-/
instance : Subsingleton (LocallyConstant (∅ : Set (I → Bool)) ℤ) :=
subsingleton_iff.mpr (fun _ _ ↦ LocallyConstant.ext isEmptyElim)
instance : IsEmpty { l // Products.isGood (∅ : Set (I → Bool)) l } :=
isEmpty_iff.mpr fun ⟨l, hl⟩ ↦ hl <| by
rw [subsingleton_iff.mp inferInstance (Products.eval ∅ l) 0]
exact Submodule.zero_mem _
theorem GoodProducts.linearIndependentEmpty :
LinearIndependent ℤ (eval (∅ : Set (I → Bool))) := linearIndependent_empty_type
/-- The empty list as a `Products` -/
def Products.nil : Products I := ⟨[], by simp only [List.chain'_nil]⟩
theorem Products.lt_nil_empty : { m : Products I | m < Products.nil } = ∅ := by
ext ⟨m, hm⟩
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by tauto⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, lt_iff_lex_lt, nil, List.Lex.not_nil_right] at h
instance {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (LocallyConstant α ℤ) :=
⟨0, 1, ne_of_apply_ne DFunLike.coe <| (Function.const_injective (β := ℤ)).ne zero_ne_one⟩
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Products.isGood_nil : Products.isGood ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool)) Products.nil := by
intro h
simp only [Products.lt_nil_empty, Products.eval, List.map, List.prod_nil, Set.image_empty,
Submodule.span_empty, Submodule.mem_bot, one_ne_zero] at h
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Products.span_nil_eq_top :
Submodule.span ℤ (eval ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool)) '' {nil}) = ⊤ := by
rw [Set.image_singleton, eq_top_iff]
intro f _
rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
refine ⟨f default, ?_⟩
simp only [eval, List.map, List.prod_nil, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_one]
ext x
obtain rfl : x = default := by simp only [Set.default_coe_singleton, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rfl
/-- There is a unique `GoodProducts` for the singleton `{fun _ ↦ false}`. -/
noncomputable
instance : Unique { l // Products.isGood ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool)) l } where
default := ⟨Products.nil, Products.isGood_nil⟩
uniq := by
intro ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, hll⟩
ext
apply Subtype.ext
apply (List.Lex.nil_left_or_eq_nil l (r := (·<·))).resolve_left
intro _
apply hll
have he : {Products.nil} ⊆ {m | m < ⟨l,hl⟩} := by
simpa only [Products.nil, Products.lt_iff_lex_lt, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
apply Submodule.span_mono (Set.image_subset _ he)
rw [Products.span_nil_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
instance (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] : NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ (LocallyConstant α ℤ) := by
constructor
intro c f h
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hc
ext x
apply mul_right_injective₀ hc
simp [LocallyConstant.ext_iff] at h ⊢
exact h x
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem GoodProducts.linearIndependentSingleton :
LinearIndependent ℤ (eval ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool))) := by
refine linearIndependent_unique (eval ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool))) ?_
simp only [eval, Products.eval, List.map, List.prod_nil, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
end Zero
section Maps
/-!
## `ℤ`-linear maps induced by projections
We define injective `ℤ`-linear maps between modules of the form `LocallyConstant C ℤ` induced by
precomposition with the projections defined in the section `Projections`.
### Main definitions
* `πs` and `πs'` are the `ℤ`-linear maps corresponding to `ProjRestrict` and `ProjRestricts`
respectively.
### Main result
* We prove that `πs` and `πs'` interact well with `Products.eval` and the main application is the
theorem `isGood_mono` which says that the property `isGood` is "monotone" on ordinals.
-/
theorem contained_eq_proj (o : Ordinal) (h : contained C o) :
C = π C (ord I · < o) := by
have := proj_prop_eq_self C (ord I · < o)
simp [π, Bool.not_eq_false] at this
exact (this (fun i x hx ↦ h x hx i)).symm
theorem isClosed_proj (o : Ordinal) (hC : IsClosed C) : IsClosed (π C (ord I · < o)) :=
(continuous_proj (ord I · < o)).isClosedMap C hC
theorem contained_proj (o : Ordinal) : contained (π C (ord I · < o)) o := by
intro x ⟨_, _, h⟩ j hj
aesop (add simp Proj)
/-- The `ℤ`-linear map induced by precomposition of the projection `C → π C (ord I · < o)`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable
def πs (o : Ordinal) : LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ →ₗ[ℤ] LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
LocallyConstant.comapₗ ℤ ⟨(ProjRestrict C (ord I · < o)), (continuous_projRestrict _ _)⟩
theorem coe_πs (o : Ordinal) (f : LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ) :
πs C o f = f ∘ ProjRestrict C (ord I · < o) := by
rfl
theorem injective_πs (o : Ordinal) : Function.Injective (πs C o) :=
LocallyConstant.comap_injective ⟨_, (continuous_projRestrict _ _)⟩
(Set.surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _)
/-- The `ℤ`-linear map induced by precomposition of the projection
`π C (ord I · < o₂) → π C (ord I · < o₁)` for `o₁ ≤ o₂`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable
def πs' {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) :
LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o₁)) ℤ →ₗ[ℤ] LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o₂)) ℤ :=
LocallyConstant.comapₗ ℤ ⟨(ProjRestricts C (fun _ hh ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hh h)),
(continuous_projRestricts _ _)⟩
theorem coe_πs' {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) (f : LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o₁)) ℤ) :
(πs' C h f).toFun = f.toFun ∘ (ProjRestricts C (fun _ hh ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hh h)) := by
rfl
theorem injective_πs' {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) : Function.Injective (πs' C h) :=
LocallyConstant.comap_injective ⟨_, (continuous_projRestricts _ _)⟩
(surjective_projRestricts _ fun _ hi ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hi h)
namespace Products
theorem lt_ord_of_lt {l m : Products I} {o : Ordinal} (h₁ : m < l)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o) : ∀ i ∈ m.val, ord I i < o :=
List.Sorted.lt_ord_of_lt (List.chain'_iff_pairwise.mp l.2) (List.chain'_iff_pairwise.mp m.2) h₁ h₂
theorem eval_πs {l : Products I} {o : Ordinal} (hlt : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o) :
πs C o (l.eval (π C (ord I · < o))) = l.eval C := by
simpa only [← LocallyConstant.coe_inj] using evalFacProp C (ord I · < o) hlt
theorem eval_πs' {l : Products I} {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂)
(hlt : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o₁) :
πs' C h (l.eval (π C (ord I · < o₁))) = l.eval (π C (ord I · < o₂)) := by
rw [← LocallyConstant.coe_inj, ← LocallyConstant.toFun_eq_coe]
exact evalFacProps C (fun (i : I) ↦ ord I i < o₁) (fun (i : I) ↦ ord I i < o₂) hlt
(fun _ hh ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hh h)
theorem eval_πs_image {l : Products I} {o : Ordinal}
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o) : eval C '' { m | m < l } =
(πs C o) '' (eval (π C (ord I · < o)) '' { m | m < l }) := by
ext f
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
apply exists_congr; intro m
apply and_congr_right; intro hm
rw [eval_πs C (lt_ord_of_lt hm hl)]
theorem eval_πs_image' {l : Products I} {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o₁) : eval (π C (ord I · < o₂)) '' { m | m < l } =
(πs' C h) '' (eval (π C (ord I · < o₁)) '' { m | m < l }) := by
ext f
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
apply exists_congr; intro m
apply and_congr_right; intro hm
rw [eval_πs' C h (lt_ord_of_lt hm hl)]
theorem head_lt_ord_of_isGood [Inhabited I] {l : Products I} {o : Ordinal}
(h : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o))) (hn : l.val ≠ []) : ord I (l.val.head!) < o :=
prop_of_isGood C (ord I · < o) h l.val.head! (List.head!_mem_self hn)
/--
If `l` is good w.r.t. `π C (ord I · < o₁)` and `o₁ ≤ o₂`, then it is good w.r.t.
`π C (ord I · < o₂)`
-/
theorem isGood_mono {l : Products I} {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂)
(hl : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o₁))) : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o₂)) := by
intro hl'
apply hl
rwa [eval_πs_image' C h (prop_of_isGood C _ hl), ← eval_πs' C h (prop_of_isGood C _ hl),
Submodule.apply_mem_span_image_iff_mem_span (injective_πs' C h)] at hl'
end Products
end Maps
section Limit
/-!
## The limit case of the induction
We relate linear independence in `LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o')) ℤ` with linear independence
in `LocallyConstant C ℤ`, where `contained C o` and `o' < o`.
When `o` is a limit ordinal, we prove that the good products in `LocallyConstant C ℤ` are linearly
independent if and only if a certain directed union is linearly independent. Each term in this
directed union is in bijection with the good products w.r.t. `π C (ord I · < o')` for an ordinal
`o' < o`, and these are linearly independent by the inductive hypothesis.
### Main definitions
* `GoodProducts.smaller` is the image of good products coming from a smaller ordinal.
* `GoodProducts.range_equiv`: The image of the `GoodProducts` in `C` is equivalent to the union of
`smaller C o'` over all ordinals `o' < o`.
### Main results
* `Products.limitOrdinal`: for `o` a limit ordinal such that `contained C o`, a product `l` is good
w.r.t. `C` iff it there exists an ordinal `o' < o` such that `l` is good w.r.t.
`π C (ord I · < o')`.
* `GoodProducts.linearIndependent_iff_union_smaller` is the result mentioned above, that the good
products are linearly independent iff a directed union is.
-/
namespace GoodProducts
/--
The image of the `GoodProducts` for `π C (ord I · < o)` in `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. The name `smaller`
refers to the setting in which we will use this, when we are mapping in `GoodProducts` from a
smaller set, i.e. when `o` is a smaller ordinal than the one `C` is "contained" in.
-/
def smaller (o : Ordinal) : Set (LocallyConstant C ℤ) :=
(πs C o) '' (range (π C (ord I · < o)))
/--
The map from the image of the `GoodProducts` in `LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ` to
`smaller C o`
-/
noncomputable
def range_equiv_smaller_toFun (o : Ordinal) (x : range (π C (ord I · < o))) : smaller C o :=
⟨πs C o ↑x, x.val, x.property, rfl⟩
theorem range_equiv_smaller_toFun_bijective (o : Ordinal) :
Function.Bijective (range_equiv_smaller_toFun C o) := by
dsimp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [range_equiv_smaller_toFun]
refine ⟨fun a b hab ↦ ?_, fun ⟨a, b, hb⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· ext1
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hab
exact injective_πs C o hab
· use ⟨b, hb.1⟩
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq] using hb.2
/--
The equivalence from the image of the `GoodProducts` in `LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ` to
`smaller C o`
-/
noncomputable
def range_equiv_smaller (o : Ordinal) : range (π C (ord I · < o)) ≃ smaller C o :=
Equiv.ofBijective (range_equiv_smaller_toFun C o) (range_equiv_smaller_toFun_bijective C o)
theorem smaller_factorization (o : Ordinal) :
(fun (p : smaller C o) ↦ p.1) ∘ (range_equiv_smaller C o).toFun =
(πs C o) ∘ (fun (p : range (π C (ord I · < o))) ↦ p.1) := by rfl
theorem linearIndependent_iff_smaller (o : Ordinal) :
LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval (π C (ord I · < o))) ↔
LinearIndependent ℤ (fun (p : smaller C o) ↦ p.1) := by
rw [GoodProducts.linearIndependent_iff_range,
← LinearMap.linearIndependent_iff (πs C o)
(LinearMap.ker_eq_bot_of_injective (injective_πs _ _)), ← smaller_factorization C o]
exact linearIndependent_equiv _
theorem smaller_mono {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) : smaller C o₁ ⊆ smaller C o₂ := by
rintro f ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
simp only [smaller, Set.mem_image]
use πs' C h g
obtain ⟨⟨l, gl⟩, rfl⟩ := hg
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· use ⟨l, Products.isGood_mono C h gl⟩
ext x
rw [eval, ← Products.eval_πs' _ h (Products.prop_of_isGood C _ gl), eval]
· rw [← LocallyConstant.coe_inj, coe_πs C o₂, ← LocallyConstant.toFun_eq_coe, coe_πs',
Function.comp.assoc, projRestricts_comp_projRestrict C _, coe_πs]
rfl
end GoodProducts
variable {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit) (hsC : contained C o)
theorem Products.limitOrdinal (l : Products I) : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o)) ↔
∃ (o' : Ordinal), o' < o ∧ l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o')) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨o', ⟨ho', hl⟩⟩ ↦ isGood_mono C (le_of_lt ho') hl⟩
use Finset.sup l.val.toFinset (fun a ↦ Order.succ (ord I a))
have ha : ⊥ < o := by rw [Ordinal.bot_eq_zero, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]; exact ho.1
have hslt : Finset.sup l.val.toFinset (fun a ↦ Order.succ (ord I a)) < o := by
simp only [Finset.sup_lt_iff ha, List.mem_toFinset]
exact fun b hb ↦ ho.2 _ (prop_of_isGood C (ord I · < o) h b hb)
refine ⟨hslt, fun he ↦ h ?_⟩
have hlt : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < Finset.sup l.val.toFinset (fun a ↦ Order.succ (ord I a)) := by
intro i hi
simp only [Finset.lt_sup_iff, List.mem_toFinset, Order.lt_succ_iff]
exact ⟨i, hi, le_rfl⟩
rwa [eval_πs_image' C (le_of_lt hslt) hlt, ← eval_πs' C (le_of_lt hslt) hlt,
Submodule.apply_mem_span_image_iff_mem_span (injective_πs' C _)]
theorem GoodProducts.union : range C = ⋃ (e : {o' // o' < o}), (smaller C e.val) := by
ext p
simp only [smaller, range, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range, Subtype.exists]
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, fun hp ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩ := hp
rw [contained_eq_proj C o hsC, Products.limitOrdinal C ho] at hl
obtain ⟨o', ho'⟩ := hl
refine ⟨o', ho'.1, eval (π C (ord I · < o')) ⟨l, ho'.2⟩, ⟨l, ho'.2, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact Products.eval_πs C (Products.prop_of_isGood C _ ho'.2)
· obtain ⟨o', h, _, ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := hp
refine ⟨l, ?_, (Products.eval_πs C (Products.prop_of_isGood C _ hl)).symm⟩
rw [contained_eq_proj C o hsC]
exact Products.isGood_mono C (le_of_lt h) hl
/--
The image of the `GoodProducts` in `C` is equivalent to the union of `smaller C o'` over all
ordinals `o' < o`.
-/
def GoodProducts.range_equiv : range C ≃ ⋃ (e : {o' // o' < o}), (smaller C e.val) :=
Equiv.Set.ofEq (union C ho hsC)
theorem GoodProducts.range_equiv_factorization :
(fun (p : ⋃ (e : {o' // o' < o}), (smaller C e.val)) ↦ p.1) ∘ (range_equiv C ho hsC).toFun =
(fun (p : range C) ↦ (p.1 : LocallyConstant C ℤ)) := rfl
theorem GoodProducts.linearIndependent_iff_union_smaller {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit)
(hsC : contained C o) : LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval C) ↔
LinearIndependent ℤ (fun (p : ⋃ (e : {o' // o' < o}), (smaller C e.val)) ↦ p.1) := by
rw [GoodProducts.linearIndependent_iff_range, ← range_equiv_factorization C ho hsC]
exact linearIndependent_equiv (range_equiv C ho hsC)
end Limit
section Successor
/-!
## The successor case in the induction
Here we assume that `o` is an ordinal such that `contained C (o+1)` and `o < I`. The element in `I`
corresponding to `o` is called `term I ho`, but in this informal docstring we refer to it simply as
`o`.
This section follows the proof in [scholze2019condensed] quite closely. A translation of the
notation there is as follows:
```
[scholze2019condensed] | This file
`S₀` |`C0`
`S₁` |`C1`
`\overline{S}` |`π C (ord I · < o)
`\overline{S}'` |`C'`
The left map in the exact sequence |`πs`
The right map in the exact sequence |`Linear_CC'`
```
When comparing the proof of the successor case in Theorem 5.4 in [scholze2019condensed] with this
proof, one should read the phrase "is a basis" as "is linearly independent". Also, the short exact
sequence in [scholze2019condensed] is only proved to be left exact here (indeed, that is enough
since we are only proving linear independence).
This section is split into two sections. The first one, `ExactSequence` defines the left exact
sequence mentioned in the previous paragraph (see `succ_mono` and `succ_exact`). It corresponds to
the penultimate paragraph of the proof in [scholze2019condensed]. The second one, `GoodProducts`
corresponds to the last paragraph in the proof in [scholze2019condensed].
### Main definitions
The main definitions in the section `ExactSequence` are all just notation explained in the table
above.
The main definitions in the section `GoodProducts` are as follows:
* `MaxProducts`: the set of good products that contain the ordinal `o` (since we have
`contained C (o+1)`, these all start with `o`).
* `GoodProducts.sum_equiv`: the equivalence between `GoodProducts C` and the disjoint union of
`MaxProducts C` and `GoodProducts (π C (ord I · < o))`.
### Main results
* The main results in the section `ExactSequence` are `succ_mono` and `succ_exact` which together
say that the secuence given by `πs` and `Linear_CC'` is left exact:
```
f g
0 --→ LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ --→ LocallyConstant C ℤ --→ LocallyConstant C' ℤ
```
where `f` is `πs` and `g` is `Linear_CC'`.
The main results in the section `GoodProducts` are as follows:
* `Products.max_eq_eval` says that the linear map on the right in the exact sequence, i.e.
`Linear_CC'`, takes the evaluation of a term of `MaxProducts` to the evaluation of the
corresponding list with the leading `o` removed.
* `GoodProducts.maxTail_isGood` says that removing the leading `o` from a term of `MaxProducts C`
yields a list which `isGood` with respect to `C'`.
-/
variable {o : Ordinal} (hC : IsClosed C) (hsC : contained C (Order.succ o))
(ho : o < Ordinal.type (·<· : I → I → Prop))
section ExactSequence
/-- The subset of `C` consisting of those elements whose `o`-th entry is `false`. -/
def C0 := C ∩ {f | f (term I ho) = false}
/-- The subset of `C` consisting of those elements whose `o`-th entry is `true`. -/
def C1 := C ∩ {f | f (term I ho) = true}
theorem isClosed_C0 : IsClosed (C0 C ho) := by
refine hC.inter ?_
have h : Continuous (fun (f : I → Bool) ↦ f (term I ho)) := continuous_apply (term I ho)
exact IsClosed.preimage h (t := {false}) (isClosed_discrete _)
theorem isClosed_C1 : IsClosed (C1 C ho) := by
refine hC.inter ?_
have h : Continuous (fun (f : I → Bool) ↦ f (term I ho)) := continuous_apply (term I ho)
exact IsClosed.preimage h (t := {true}) (isClosed_discrete _)
theorem contained_C1 : contained (π (C1 C ho) (ord I · < o)) o :=
contained_proj _ _
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 1,184 | 1,187 | theorem union_C0C1_eq : (C0 C ho) ∪ (C1 C ho) = C := by |
ext x
simp only [C0, C1, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
← and_or_left, and_iff_left_iff_imp, Bool.dichotomy (x (term I ho)), implies_true]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
#align_import analysis.convex.cone.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"915591b2bb3ea303648db07284a161a7f2a9e3d4"
/-!
# Convex cones
In a `𝕜`-module `E`, we define a convex cone as a set `s` such that `a • x + b • y ∈ s` whenever
`x, y ∈ s` and `a, b > 0`. We prove that convex cones form a `CompleteLattice`, and define their
images (`ConvexCone.map`) and preimages (`ConvexCone.comap`) under linear maps.
We define pointed, blunt, flat and salient cones, and prove the correspondence between
convex cones and ordered modules.
We define `Convex.toCone` to be the minimal cone that includes a given convex set.
## Main statements
In `Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Cone/Extension.lean` we prove
the M. Riesz extension theorem and a form of the Hahn-Banach theorem.
In `Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Cone/Dual.lean` we prove
a variant of the hyperplane separation theorem.
## Implementation notes
While `Convex 𝕜` is a predicate on sets, `ConvexCone 𝕜 E` is a bundled convex cone.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_cone
* [Stephen P. Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, *Convex Optimization*][boydVandenberghe2004]
* [Emo Welzl and Bernd Gärtner, *Cone Programming*][welzl_garter]
-/
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
assert_not_exists Real
open Set LinearMap
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
/-! ### Definition of `ConvexCone` and basic properties -/
section Definitions
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
/-- A convex cone is a subset `s` of a `𝕜`-module such that `a • x + b • y ∈ s` whenever `a, b > 0`
and `x, y ∈ s`. -/
structure ConvexCone [AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E] where
/-- The **carrier set** underlying this cone: the set of points contained in it -/
carrier : Set E
smul_mem' : ∀ ⦃c : 𝕜⦄, 0 < c → ∀ ⦃x : E⦄, x ∈ carrier → c • x ∈ carrier
add_mem' : ∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ carrier) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ carrier), x + y ∈ carrier
#align convex_cone ConvexCone
end Definitions
namespace ConvexCone
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (S T : ConvexCone 𝕜 E)
instance : SetLike (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) E where
coe := carrier
coe_injective' S T h := by cases S; cases T; congr
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {s : Set E} {h₁ h₂} : ↑(@mk 𝕜 _ _ _ _ s h₁ h₂) = s :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.coe_mk ConvexCone.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s : Set E} {h₁ h₂ x} : x ∈ @mk 𝕜 _ _ _ _ s h₁ h₂ ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align convex_cone.mem_mk ConvexCone.mem_mk
/-- Two `ConvexCone`s are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align convex_cone.ext ConvexCone.ext
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem smul_mem {c : 𝕜} {x : E} (hc : 0 < c) (hx : x ∈ S) : c • x ∈ S :=
S.smul_mem' hc hx
#align convex_cone.smul_mem ConvexCone.smul_mem
theorem add_mem ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ S) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ S) : x + y ∈ S :=
S.add_mem' hx hy
#align convex_cone.add_mem ConvexCone.add_mem
instance : AddMemClass (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) E where add_mem ha hb := add_mem _ ha hb
instance : Inf (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨fun S T =>
⟨S ∩ T, fun _ hc _ hx => ⟨S.smul_mem hc hx.1, T.smul_mem hc hx.2⟩, fun _ hx _ hy =>
⟨S.add_mem hx.1 hy.1, T.add_mem hx.2 hy.2⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf : ((S ⊓ T : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : Set E) = ↑S ∩ ↑T :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.coe_inf ConvexCone.coe_inf
theorem mem_inf {x} : x ∈ S ⊓ T ↔ x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T :=
Iff.rfl
#align convex_cone.mem_inf ConvexCone.mem_inf
instance : InfSet (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨fun S =>
⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s, fun _ hc _ hx => mem_biInter fun s hs => s.smul_mem hc <| mem_iInter₂.1 hx s hs,
fun _ hx _ hy =>
mem_biInter fun s hs => s.add_mem (mem_iInter₂.1 hx s hs) (mem_iInter₂.1 hy s hs)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (ConvexCone 𝕜 E)) : ↑(sInf S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set E) :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.coe_Inf ConvexCone.coe_sInf
theorem mem_sInf {x : E} {S : Set (ConvexCone 𝕜 E)} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s :=
mem_iInter₂
#align convex_cone.mem_Inf ConvexCone.mem_sInf
@[simp]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : ↑(iInf f) = ⋂ i, (f i : Set E) := by
simp [iInf]
#align convex_cone.coe_infi ConvexCone.coe_iInf
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : E} {f : ι → ConvexCone 𝕜 E} : x ∈ iInf f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i :=
mem_iInter₂.trans <| by simp
#align convex_cone.mem_infi ConvexCone.mem_iInf
variable (𝕜)
instance : Bot (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨⟨∅, fun _ _ _ => False.elim, fun _ => False.elim⟩⟩
theorem mem_bot (x : E) : (x ∈ (⊥ : ConvexCone 𝕜 E)) = False :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.mem_bot ConvexCone.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ↑(⊥ : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) = (∅ : Set E) :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.coe_bot ConvexCone.coe_bot
instance : Top (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨⟨univ, fun _ _ _ _ => mem_univ _, fun _ _ _ _ => mem_univ _⟩⟩
theorem mem_top (x : E) : x ∈ (⊤ : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
mem_univ x
#align convex_cone.mem_top ConvexCone.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ↑(⊤ : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) = (univ : Set E) :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.coe_top ConvexCone.coe_top
instance : CompleteLattice (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
{ SetLike.instPartialOrder with
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun _ _ => False.elim
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ x _ => mem_top 𝕜 x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
sInf := InfSet.sInf
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
sSup := fun s => sInf { T | ∀ S ∈ s, S ≤ T }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => fun _ hx => mem_sInf.2 fun _ hs => hs.1 hx
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => fun _ hx => mem_sInf.2 fun _ hs => hs.2 hx
sup_le := fun _ _ c ha hb _ hx => mem_sInf.1 hx c ⟨ha, hb⟩
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ha hb _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right
le_sSup := fun _ p hs _ hx => mem_sInf.2 fun _ ht => ht p hs hx
sSup_le := fun _ p hs _ hx => mem_sInf.1 hx p hs
le_sInf := fun _ _ ha _ hx => mem_sInf.2 fun t ht => ha t ht hx
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha _ hx => mem_sInf.1 hx _ ha }
instance : Inhabited (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨⊥⟩
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E)
protected theorem convex : Convex 𝕜 (S : Set E) :=
convex_iff_forall_pos.2 fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb _ =>
S.add_mem (S.smul_mem ha hx) (S.smul_mem hb hy)
#align convex_cone.convex ConvexCone.convex
end Module
section Maps
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [AddCommMonoid G]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [Module 𝕜 G]
/-- The image of a convex cone under a `𝕜`-linear map is a convex cone. -/
def map (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : ConvexCone 𝕜 F where
carrier := f '' S
smul_mem' := fun c hc _ ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ f.map_smul c x ▸ mem_image_of_mem f (S.smul_mem hc hx)
add_mem' := fun _ ⟨x₁, hx₁, hy₁⟩ _ ⟨x₂, hx₂, hy₂⟩ =>
hy₁ ▸ hy₂ ▸ f.map_add x₁ x₂ ▸ mem_image_of_mem f (S.add_mem hx₁ hx₂)
#align convex_cone.map ConvexCone.map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : (S.map f : Set F) = f '' S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F} {S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} {y : F} : y ∈ S.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
Set.mem_image f S y
#align convex_cone.mem_map ConvexCone.mem_map
theorem map_map (g : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_image g f S
#align convex_cone.map_map ConvexCone.map_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : S.map LinearMap.id = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_id _
#align convex_cone.map_id ConvexCone.map_id
/-- The preimage of a convex cone under a `𝕜`-linear map is a convex cone. -/
def comap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 F) : ConvexCone 𝕜 E where
carrier := f ⁻¹' S
smul_mem' c hc x hx := by
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_smul c]
exact S.smul_mem hc hx
add_mem' x hx y hy := by
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add]
exact S.add_mem hx hy
#align convex_cone.comap ConvexCone.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 F) : (S.comap f : Set E) = f ⁻¹' S :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.coe_comap ConvexCone.coe_comap
@[simp] -- Porting note: was not a `dsimp` lemma
theorem comap_id (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : S.comap LinearMap.id = S :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.comap_id ConvexCone.comap_id
theorem comap_comap (g : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 G) :
(S.comap g).comap f = S.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.comap_comap ConvexCone.comap_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F} {S : ConvexCone 𝕜 F} {x : E} : x ∈ S.comap f ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
#align convex_cone.mem_comap ConvexCone.mem_comap
end Maps
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField 𝕜]
section MulAction
variable [AddCommMonoid E]
variable [MulAction 𝕜 E] (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E)
theorem smul_mem_iff {c : 𝕜} (hc : 0 < c) {x : E} : c • x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S :=
⟨fun h => inv_smul_smul₀ hc.ne' x ▸ S.smul_mem (inv_pos.2 hc) h, S.smul_mem hc⟩
#align convex_cone.smul_mem_iff ConvexCone.smul_mem_iff
end MulAction
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- Constructs an ordered module given an `OrderedAddCommGroup`, a cone, and a proof that
the order relation is the one defined by the cone.
-/
theorem to_orderedSMul (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) (h : ∀ x y : E, x ≤ y ↔ y - x ∈ S) : OrderedSMul 𝕜 E :=
OrderedSMul.mk'
(by
intro x y z xy hz
rw [h (z • x) (z • y), ← smul_sub z y x]
exact smul_mem S hz ((h x y).mp xy.le))
#align convex_cone.to_ordered_smul ConvexCone.to_orderedSMul
end OrderedAddCommGroup
end LinearOrderedField
/-! ### Convex cones with extra properties -/
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E] (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E)
/-- A convex cone is pointed if it includes `0`. -/
def Pointed (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : Prop :=
(0 : E) ∈ S
#align convex_cone.pointed ConvexCone.Pointed
/-- A convex cone is blunt if it doesn't include `0`. -/
def Blunt (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : Prop :=
(0 : E) ∉ S
#align convex_cone.blunt ConvexCone.Blunt
theorem pointed_iff_not_blunt (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : S.Pointed ↔ ¬S.Blunt :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁, Classical.not_not.mp⟩
#align convex_cone.pointed_iff_not_blunt ConvexCone.pointed_iff_not_blunt
theorem blunt_iff_not_pointed (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : S.Blunt ↔ ¬S.Pointed := by
rw [pointed_iff_not_blunt, Classical.not_not]
#align convex_cone.blunt_iff_not_pointed ConvexCone.blunt_iff_not_pointed
theorem Pointed.mono {S T : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} (h : S ≤ T) : S.Pointed → T.Pointed :=
@h _
#align convex_cone.pointed.mono ConvexCone.Pointed.mono
theorem Blunt.anti {S T : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} (h : T ≤ S) : S.Blunt → T.Blunt :=
(· ∘ @h 0)
#align convex_cone.blunt.anti ConvexCone.Blunt.anti
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E)
/-- A convex cone is flat if it contains some nonzero vector `x` and its opposite `-x`. -/
def Flat : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ S, x ≠ (0 : E) ∧ -x ∈ S
#align convex_cone.flat ConvexCone.Flat
/-- A convex cone is salient if it doesn't include `x` and `-x` for any nonzero `x`. -/
def Salient : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ S, x ≠ (0 : E) → -x ∉ S
#align convex_cone.salient ConvexCone.Salient
theorem salient_iff_not_flat (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : S.Salient ↔ ¬S.Flat := by
simp [Salient, Flat]
#align convex_cone.salient_iff_not_flat ConvexCone.salient_iff_not_flat
theorem Flat.mono {S T : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} (h : S ≤ T) : S.Flat → T.Flat
| ⟨x, hxS, hx, hnxS⟩ => ⟨x, h hxS, hx, h hnxS⟩
#align convex_cone.flat.mono ConvexCone.Flat.mono
theorem Salient.anti {S T : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} (h : T ≤ S) : S.Salient → T.Salient :=
fun hS x hxT hx hnT => hS x (h hxT) hx (h hnT)
#align convex_cone.salient.anti ConvexCone.Salient.anti
/-- A flat cone is always pointed (contains `0`). -/
theorem Flat.pointed {S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} (hS : S.Flat) : S.Pointed := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, _, hxneg⟩ := hS
rw [Pointed, ← add_neg_self x]
exact add_mem S hx hxneg
#align convex_cone.flat.pointed ConvexCone.Flat.pointed
/-- A blunt cone (one not containing `0`) is always salient. -/
theorem Blunt.salient {S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E} : S.Blunt → S.Salient := by
rw [salient_iff_not_flat, blunt_iff_not_pointed]
exact mt Flat.pointed
#align convex_cone.blunt.salient ConvexCone.Blunt.salient
/-- A pointed convex cone defines a preorder. -/
def toPreorder (h₁ : S.Pointed) : Preorder E where
le x y := y - x ∈ S
le_refl x := by change x - x ∈ S; rw [sub_self x]; exact h₁
le_trans x y z xy zy := by simpa using add_mem S zy xy
#align convex_cone.to_preorder ConvexCone.toPreorder
/-- A pointed and salient cone defines a partial order. -/
def toPartialOrder (h₁ : S.Pointed) (h₂ : S.Salient) : PartialOrder E :=
{ toPreorder S h₁ with
le_antisymm := by
intro a b ab ba
by_contra h
have h' : b - a ≠ 0 := fun h'' => h (eq_of_sub_eq_zero h'').symm
have H := h₂ (b - a) ab h'
rw [neg_sub b a] at H
exact H ba }
#align convex_cone.to_partial_order ConvexCone.toPartialOrder
/-- A pointed and salient cone defines an `OrderedAddCommGroup`. -/
def toOrderedAddCommGroup (h₁ : S.Pointed) (h₂ : S.Salient) : OrderedAddCommGroup E :=
{ toPartialOrder S h₁ h₂, show AddCommGroup E by infer_instance with
add_le_add_left := by
intro a b hab c
change c + b - (c + a) ∈ S
rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
exact hab }
#align convex_cone.to_ordered_add_comm_group ConvexCone.toOrderedAddCommGroup
end AddCommGroup
section Module
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E]
instance : Zero (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨⟨0, fun _ _ => by simp, fun _ => by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_zero (x : E) : x ∈ (0 : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align convex_cone.mem_zero ConvexCone.mem_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ConvexCone 𝕜 E) : Set E) = 0 :=
rfl
#align convex_cone.coe_zero ConvexCone.coe_zero
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Cone/Basic.lean | 441 | 441 | theorem pointed_zero : (0 : ConvexCone 𝕜 E).Pointed := by | rw [Pointed, mem_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
#align_import topology.metric_space.metric_separated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
/-!
# Metric separated pairs of sets
In this file we define the predicate `IsMetricSeparated`. We say that two sets in an (extended)
metric space are *metric separated* if the (extended) distance between `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t` is
bounded from below by a positive constant.
This notion is useful, e.g., to define metric outer measures.
-/
open EMetric Set
noncomputable section
/-- Two sets in an (extended) metric space are called *metric separated* if the (extended) distance
between `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t` is bounded from below by a positive constant. -/
def IsMetricSeparated {X : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] (s t : Set X) :=
∃ r, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, r ≤ edist x y
#align is_metric_separated IsMetricSeparated
namespace IsMetricSeparated
variable {X : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] {s t : Set X} {x y : X}
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : IsMetricSeparated s t) : IsMetricSeparated t s :=
let ⟨r, r0, hr⟩ := h
⟨r, r0, fun y hy x hx => edist_comm x y ▸ hr x hx y hy⟩
#align is_metric_separated.symm IsMetricSeparated.symm
theorem comm : IsMetricSeparated s t ↔ IsMetricSeparated t s :=
⟨symm, symm⟩
#align is_metric_separated.comm IsMetricSeparated.comm
@[simp]
theorem empty_left (s : Set X) : IsMetricSeparated ∅ s :=
⟨1, one_ne_zero, fun _x => False.elim⟩
#align is_metric_separated.empty_left IsMetricSeparated.empty_left
@[simp]
theorem empty_right (s : Set X) : IsMetricSeparated s ∅ :=
(empty_left s).symm
#align is_metric_separated.empty_right IsMetricSeparated.empty_right
protected theorem disjoint (h : IsMetricSeparated s t) : Disjoint s t :=
let ⟨r, r0, hr⟩ := h
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun x hx1 hx2 => r0 <| by simpa using hr x hx1 x hx2
#align is_metric_separated.disjoint IsMetricSeparated.disjoint
theorem subset_compl_right (h : IsMetricSeparated s t) : s ⊆ tᶜ := fun _ hs ht =>
h.disjoint.le_bot ⟨hs, ht⟩
#align is_metric_separated.subset_compl_right IsMetricSeparated.subset_compl_right
@[mono]
theorem mono {s' t'} (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') :
IsMetricSeparated s' t' → IsMetricSeparated s t := fun ⟨r, r0, hr⟩ =>
⟨r, r0, fun x hx y hy => hr x (hs hx) y (ht hy)⟩
#align is_metric_separated.mono IsMetricSeparated.mono
theorem mono_left {s'} (h' : IsMetricSeparated s' t) (hs : s ⊆ s') : IsMetricSeparated s t :=
h'.mono hs Subset.rfl
#align is_metric_separated.mono_left IsMetricSeparated.mono_left
theorem mono_right {t'} (h' : IsMetricSeparated s t') (ht : t ⊆ t') : IsMetricSeparated s t :=
h'.mono Subset.rfl ht
#align is_metric_separated.mono_right IsMetricSeparated.mono_right
theorem union_left {s'} (h : IsMetricSeparated s t) (h' : IsMetricSeparated s' t) :
IsMetricSeparated (s ∪ s') t := by
rcases h, h' with ⟨⟨r, r0, hr⟩, ⟨r', r0', hr'⟩⟩
refine ⟨min r r', ?_, fun x hx y hy => hx.elim ?_ ?_⟩
· rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero] at r0 r0' ⊢
exact lt_min r0 r0'
· exact fun hx => (min_le_left _ _).trans (hr _ hx _ hy)
· exact fun hx => (min_le_right _ _).trans (hr' _ hx _ hy)
#align is_metric_separated.union_left IsMetricSeparated.union_left
@[simp]
theorem union_left_iff {s'} :
IsMetricSeparated (s ∪ s') t ↔ IsMetricSeparated s t ∧ IsMetricSeparated s' t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono_left subset_union_left, h.mono_left subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union_left h.2⟩
#align is_metric_separated.union_left_iff IsMetricSeparated.union_left_iff
theorem union_right {t'} (h : IsMetricSeparated s t) (h' : IsMetricSeparated s t') :
IsMetricSeparated s (t ∪ t') :=
(h.symm.union_left h'.symm).symm
#align is_metric_separated.union_right IsMetricSeparated.union_right
@[simp]
theorem union_right_iff {t'} :
IsMetricSeparated s (t ∪ t') ↔ IsMetricSeparated s t ∧ IsMetricSeparated s t' :=
comm.trans <| union_left_iff.trans <| and_congr comm comm
#align is_metric_separated.union_right_iff IsMetricSeparated.union_right_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/MetricSeparated.lean | 106 | 109 | theorem finite_iUnion_left_iff {ι : Type*} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ι → Set X}
{t : Set X} : IsMetricSeparated (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) t ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, IsMetricSeparated (s i) t := by |
refine Finite.induction_on hI (by simp) @fun i I _ _ hI => ?_
rw [biUnion_insert, forall_mem_insert, union_left_iff, hI]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Junyan Xu, Jack McKoen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AsSubring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Pointwise
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.valuation.valuation_subring from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Valuation subrings of a field
## Projects
The order structure on `ValuationSubring K`.
-/
universe u
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
variable (K : Type u) [Field K]
/-- A valuation subring of a field `K` is a subring `A` such that for every `x : K`,
either `x ∈ A` or `x⁻¹ ∈ A`. -/
structure ValuationSubring extends Subring K where
mem_or_inv_mem' : ∀ x : K, x ∈ carrier ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align valuation_subring ValuationSubring
namespace ValuationSubring
variable {K}
variable (A : ValuationSubring K)
instance : SetLike (ValuationSubring K) K where
coe A := A.toSubring
coe_injective' := by
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
replace h := SetLike.coe_injective' h
congr
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove that
theorem mem_carrier (x : K) : x ∈ A.carrier ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
#align valuation_subring.mem_carrier ValuationSubring.mem_carrier
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubring (x : K) : x ∈ A.toSubring ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
#align valuation_subring.mem_to_subring ValuationSubring.mem_toSubring
@[ext]
theorem ext (A B : ValuationSubring K) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) : A = B := SetLike.ext h
#align valuation_subring.ext ValuationSubring.ext
theorem zero_mem : (0 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.zero_mem
#align valuation_subring.zero_mem ValuationSubring.zero_mem
theorem one_mem : (1 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.one_mem
#align valuation_subring.one_mem ValuationSubring.one_mem
theorem add_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x + y ∈ A := A.toSubring.add_mem
#align valuation_subring.add_mem ValuationSubring.add_mem
theorem mul_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x * y ∈ A := A.toSubring.mul_mem
#align valuation_subring.mul_mem ValuationSubring.mul_mem
theorem neg_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A → -x ∈ A := A.toSubring.neg_mem
#align valuation_subring.neg_mem ValuationSubring.neg_mem
theorem mem_or_inv_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ A := A.mem_or_inv_mem' _
#align valuation_subring.mem_or_inv_mem ValuationSubring.mem_or_inv_mem
instance : SubringClass (ValuationSubring K) K where
zero_mem := zero_mem
add_mem {_} a b := add_mem _ a b
one_mem := one_mem
mul_mem {_} a b := mul_mem _ a b
neg_mem {_} x := neg_mem _ x
theorem toSubring_injective : Function.Injective (toSubring : ValuationSubring K → Subring K) :=
fun x y h => by cases x; cases y; congr
#align valuation_subring.to_subring_injective ValuationSubring.toSubring_injective
instance : CommRing A :=
show CommRing A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : IsDomain A :=
show IsDomain A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : Top (ValuationSubring K) :=
Top.mk <| { (⊤ : Subring K) with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun _ => Or.inl trivial }
theorem mem_top (x : K) : x ∈ (⊤ : ValuationSubring K) :=
trivial
#align valuation_subring.mem_top ValuationSubring.mem_top
theorem le_top : A ≤ ⊤ := fun _a _ha => mem_top _
#align valuation_subring.le_top ValuationSubring.le_top
instance : OrderTop (ValuationSubring K) where
top := ⊤
le_top := le_top
instance : Inhabited (ValuationSubring K) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : ValuationRing A where
cond' a b := by
by_cases h : (b : K) = 0
· use 0
left
ext
simp [h]
by_cases h : (a : K) = 0
· use 0; right
ext
simp [h]
cases' A.mem_or_inv_mem (a / b) with hh hh
· use ⟨a / b, hh⟩
right
ext
field_simp
· rw [show (a / b : K)⁻¹ = b / a by field_simp] at hh
use ⟨b / a, hh⟩;
left
ext
field_simp
instance : Algebra A K :=
show Algebra A.toSubring K by infer_instance
-- Porting note: Somehow it cannot find this instance and I'm too lazy to debug. wrong prio?
instance localRing : LocalRing A := ValuationRing.localRing A
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (a : A) : algebraMap A K a = a := rfl
#align valuation_subring.algebra_map_apply ValuationSubring.algebraMap_apply
instance : IsFractionRing A K where
map_units' := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(Units.mk0 (y : K) fun c => nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hy <| Subtype.ext c).isUnit
surj' z := by
by_cases h : z = 0; · use (0, 1); simp [h]
cases' A.mem_or_inv_mem z with hh hh
· use (⟨z, hh⟩, 1); simp
· refine ⟨⟨1, ⟨⟨_, hh⟩, ?_⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel h⟩
exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun c => h (inv_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg Subtype.val c))
exists_of_eq {a b} h := ⟨1, by ext; simpa using h⟩
/-- The value group of the valuation associated to `A`. Note: it is actually a group with zero. -/
def ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.ValueGroup A K
-- deriving LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero
#align valuation_subring.value_group ValuationSubring.ValueGroup
-- Porting note: see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
instance : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero (ValueGroup A) := by
unfold ValueGroup
infer_instance
/-- Any valuation subring of `K` induces a natural valuation on `K`. -/
def valuation : Valuation K A.ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.valuation A K
#align valuation_subring.valuation ValuationSubring.valuation
instance inhabitedValueGroup : Inhabited A.ValueGroup := ⟨A.valuation 0⟩
#align valuation_subring.inhabited_value_group ValuationSubring.inhabitedValueGroup
theorem valuation_le_one (a : A) : A.valuation a ≤ 1 :=
(ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K _).2 ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align valuation_subring.valuation_le_one ValuationSubring.valuation_le_one
theorem mem_of_valuation_le_one (x : K) (h : A.valuation x ≤ 1) : x ∈ A :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K x).1 h
ha ▸ a.2
#align valuation_subring.mem_of_valuation_le_one ValuationSubring.mem_of_valuation_le_one
theorem valuation_le_one_iff (x : K) : A.valuation x ≤ 1 ↔ x ∈ A :=
⟨mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _, fun ha => A.valuation_le_one ⟨x, ha⟩⟩
#align valuation_subring.valuation_le_one_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_le_one_iff
theorem valuation_eq_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x = A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : Aˣ, (a : K) * y = x :=
Quotient.eq''
#align valuation_subring.valuation_eq_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_eq_iff
theorem valuation_le_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x ≤ A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : A, (a : K) * y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align valuation_subring.valuation_le_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_le_iff
theorem valuation_surjective : Function.Surjective A.valuation := surjective_quot_mk _
#align valuation_subring.valuation_surjective ValuationSubring.valuation_surjective
theorem valuation_unit (a : Aˣ) : A.valuation a = 1 := by
rw [← A.valuation.map_one, valuation_eq_iff]; use a; simp
#align valuation_subring.valuation_unit ValuationSubring.valuation_unit
theorem valuation_eq_one_iff (a : A) : IsUnit a ↔ A.valuation a = 1 :=
⟨fun h => A.valuation_unit h.unit, fun h => by
have ha : (a : K) ≠ 0 := by
intro c
rw [c, A.valuation.map_zero] at h
exact zero_ne_one h
have ha' : (a : K)⁻¹ ∈ A := by rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, h, inv_one]
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one a ⟨a⁻¹, ha'⟩; ext; field_simp⟩
#align valuation_subring.valuation_eq_one_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_eq_one_iff
theorem valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one (a : A) : A.valuation a < 1 ∨ A.valuation a = 1 :=
lt_or_eq_of_le (A.valuation_le_one a)
#align valuation_subring.valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one ValuationSubring.valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one
theorem valuation_lt_one_iff (a : A) : a ∈ LocalRing.maximalIdeal A ↔ A.valuation a < 1 := by
rw [LocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal]
dsimp [nonunits]; rw [valuation_eq_one_iff]
exact (A.valuation_le_one a).lt_iff_ne.symm
#align valuation_subring.valuation_lt_one_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_lt_one_iff
/-- A subring `R` of `K` such that for all `x : K` either `x ∈ R` or `x⁻¹ ∈ R` is
a valuation subring of `K`. -/
def ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ R with mem_or_inv_mem' := hR }
#align valuation_subring.of_subring ValuationSubring.ofSubring
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) (x : K) :
x ∈ ofSubring R hR ↔ x ∈ R :=
Iff.refl _
#align valuation_subring.mem_of_subring ValuationSubring.mem_ofSubring
/-- An overring of a valuation ring is a valuation ring. -/
def ofLE (R : ValuationSubring K) (S : Subring K) (h : R.toSubring ≤ S) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ S with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun x => (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).imp (@h x) (@h _) }
#align valuation_subring.of_le ValuationSubring.ofLE
section Order
instance : SemilatticeSup (ValuationSubring K) :=
{ (inferInstance : PartialOrder (ValuationSubring K)) with
sup := fun R S => ofLE R (R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) <| le_sup_left
le_sup_left := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_left : R.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
le_sup_right := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_right : S.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
sup_le := fun R S T hR hT _ hx => (sup_le hR hT : R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring ≤ T.toSubring) hx }
/-- The ring homomorphism induced by the partial order. -/
def inclusion (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R →+* S :=
Subring.inclusion h
#align valuation_subring.inclusion ValuationSubring.inclusion
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from a valuation ring to its field of fractions. -/
def subtype (R : ValuationSubring K) : R →+* K :=
Subring.subtype R.toSubring
#align valuation_subring.subtype ValuationSubring.subtype
/-- The canonical map on value groups induced by a coarsening of valuation rings. -/
def mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R.ValueGroup →*₀ S.ValueGroup where
toFun := Quotient.map' id fun x y ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨Units.map (R.inclusion S h).toMonoidHom u, hu⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl
#align valuation_subring.map_of_le ValuationSubring.mapOfLE
@[mono]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/ValuationSubring.lean | 269 | 270 | theorem monotone_mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : Monotone (R.mapOfLE S h) := by |
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨a, ha⟩; exact ⟨R.inclusion S h a, ha⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.nat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file deals with prime numbers: natural numbers `p ≥ 2` whose only divisors are `p` and `1`.
## Important declarations
- `Nat.Prime`: the predicate that expresses that a natural number `p` is prime
- `Nat.Primes`: the subtype of natural numbers that are prime
- `Nat.minFac n`: the minimal prime factor of a natural number `n ≠ 1`
- `Nat.exists_infinite_primes`: Euclid's theorem that there exist infinitely many prime numbers.
This also appears as `Nat.not_bddAbove_setOf_prime` and `Nat.infinite_setOf_prime` (the latter
in `Data.Nat.PrimeFin`).
- `Nat.prime_iff`: `Nat.Prime` coincides with the general definition of `Prime`
- `Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime`: a non-unit natural number is
only divisible by `1` iff it is prime
-/
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- `Nat.Prime p` means that `p` is a prime number, that is, a natural number
at least 2 whose only divisors are `p` and `1`. -/
-- Porting note (#11180): removed @[pp_nodot]
def Prime (p : ℕ) :=
Irreducible p
#align nat.prime Nat.Prime
theorem irreducible_iff_nat_prime (a : ℕ) : Irreducible a ↔ Nat.Prime a :=
Iff.rfl
#align irreducible_iff_nat_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime 0
| h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align nat.not_prime_zero Nat.not_prime_zero
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime 1
| h => h.ne_one rfl
#align nat.not_prime_one Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : Prime n) : n ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero h
#align nat.prime.ne_zero Nat.Prime.ne_zero
theorem Prime.pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < p :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.pos Nat.Prime.pos
theorem Prime.two_le : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Prime p → 2 ≤ p
| 0, h => (not_prime_zero h).elim
| 1, h => (not_prime_one h).elim
| _ + 2, _ => le_add_self
#align nat.prime.two_le Nat.Prime.two_le
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p → 1 < p :=
Prime.two_le
#align nat.prime.one_lt Nat.Prime.one_lt
lemma Prime.one_le {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : 1 ≤ p := hp.one_lt.le
instance Prime.one_lt' (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (1 < p) :=
⟨hp.1.one_lt⟩
#align nat.prime.one_lt' Nat.Prime.one_lt'
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : p ≠ 1 :=
hp.one_lt.ne'
#align nat.prime.ne_one Nat.Prime.ne_one
theorem Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (m : ℕ) (hm : m ∣ p) :
m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hm
have := pp.isUnit_or_isUnit hn
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff] at this
apply Or.imp_right _ this
rintro rfl
rw [hn, mul_one]
#align nat.prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd
theorem prime_def_lt'' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.two_le, h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: needed to make ℕ explicit
have h1 := (@one_lt_two ℕ ..).trans_le h.1
refine ⟨mt Nat.isUnit_iff.mp h1.ne', fun a b hab => ?_⟩
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff]
apply Or.imp_right _ (h.2 a _)
· rintro rfl
rw [← mul_right_inj' (pos_of_gt h1).ne', ← hab, mul_one]
· rw [hab]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align nat.prime_def_lt'' Nat.prime_def_lt''
theorem prime_def_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m < p, m ∣ p → m = 1 :=
prime_def_lt''.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun h l d => (h d).resolve_right (ne_of_lt l), fun h d =>
(le_of_dvd (le_of_succ_le p2) d).lt_or_eq_dec.imp_left fun l => h l d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt Nat.prime_def_lt
theorem prime_def_lt' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m < p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun m =>
⟨fun h m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge m2 ((h l d).symm ▸ by decide), fun h l d => by
rcases m with (_ | _ | m)
· rw [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd d] at p2
revert p2
decide
· rfl
· exact (h le_add_self l).elim d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt' Nat.prime_def_lt'
theorem prime_def_le_sqrt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ≤ sqrt p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt'.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
⟨fun a m m2 l => a m m2 <| lt_of_le_of_lt l <| sqrt_lt_self p2, fun a =>
have : ∀ {m k : ℕ}, m ≤ k → 1 < m → p ≠ m * k := fun {m k} mk m1 e =>
a m m1 (le_sqrt.2 (e.symm ▸ Nat.mul_le_mul_left m mk)) ⟨k, e⟩
fun m m2 l ⟨k, e⟩ => by
rcases le_total m k with mk | km
· exact this mk m2 e
· rw [mul_comm] at e
refine this km (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ (zero_le m)) e
rwa [one_mul, ← e]⟩
#align nat.prime_def_le_sqrt Nat.prime_def_le_sqrt
theorem prime_of_coprime (n : ℕ) (h1 : 1 < n) (h : ∀ m < n, m ≠ 0 → n.Coprime m) : Prime n := by
refine prime_def_lt.mpr ⟨h1, fun m mlt mdvd => ?_⟩
have hm : m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at mdvd
exact mlt.ne' mdvd
exact (h m mlt hm).symm.eq_one_of_dvd mdvd
#align nat.prime_of_coprime Nat.prime_of_coprime
section
/-- This instance is slower than the instance `decidablePrime` defined below,
but has the advantage that it works in the kernel for small values.
If you need to prove that a particular number is prime, in any case
you should not use `by decide`, but rather `by norm_num`, which is
much faster.
-/
@[local instance]
def decidablePrime1 (p : ℕ) : Decidable (Prime p) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ prime_def_lt'
#align nat.decidable_prime_1 Nat.decidablePrime1
theorem prime_two : Prime 2 := by decide
#align nat.prime_two Nat.prime_two
theorem prime_three : Prime 3 := by decide
#align nat.prime_three Nat.prime_three
theorem prime_five : Prime 5 := by decide
theorem Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h_two : p ≠ 2)
(h_three : p ≠ 3) : 5 ≤ p := by
by_contra! h
revert h_two h_three hp
-- Porting note (#11043): was `decide!`
match p with
| 0 => decide
| 1 => decide
| 2 => decide
| 3 => decide
| 4 => decide
| n + 5 => exact (h.not_le le_add_self).elim
#align nat.prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three Nat.Prime.five_le_of_ne_two_of_ne_three
end
theorem Prime.pred_pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < pred p :=
lt_pred_iff.2 pp.one_lt
#align nat.prime.pred_pos Nat.Prime.pred_pos
theorem succ_pred_prime {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : succ (pred p) = p :=
succ_pred_eq_of_pos pp.pos
#align nat.succ_pred_prime Nat.succ_pred_prime
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p :=
⟨fun d => pp.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd m d, fun h =>
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ one_dvd _) fun e => e.symm ▸ dvd_rfl⟩
#align nat.dvd_prime Nat.dvd_prime
theorem dvd_prime_two_le {p m : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (H : 2 ≤ m) : m ∣ p ↔ m = p :=
(dvd_prime pp).trans <| or_iff_right_of_imp <| Not.elim <| ne_of_gt H
#align nat.dvd_prime_two_le Nat.dvd_prime_two_le
theorem prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq {p q : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (qp : q.Prime) : p ∣ q ↔ p = q :=
dvd_prime_two_le qp (Prime.two_le pp)
#align nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq Nat.prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : ¬p ∣ 1 :=
Irreducible.not_dvd_one pp
#align nat.prime.not_dvd_one Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one
theorem prime_mul_iff {a b : ℕ} : Nat.Prime (a * b) ↔ a.Prime ∧ b = 1 ∨ b.Prime ∧ a = 1 := by
simp only [iff_self_iff, irreducible_mul_iff, ← irreducible_iff_nat_prime, Nat.isUnit_iff]
#align nat.prime_mul_iff Nat.prime_mul_iff
theorem not_prime_mul {a b : ℕ} (a1 : a ≠ 1) (b1 : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime (a * b) := by
simp [prime_mul_iff, _root_.not_or, *]
#align nat.not_prime_mul Nat.not_prime_mul
theorem not_prime_mul' {a b n : ℕ} (h : a * b = n) (h₁ : a ≠ 1) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) : ¬Prime n :=
h ▸ not_prime_mul h₁ h₂
#align nat.not_prime_mul' Nat.not_prime_mul'
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_eq {p a : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (a1 : a ≠ 1) : a ∣ p ↔ p = a := by
refine ⟨?_, by rintro rfl; rfl⟩
rintro ⟨j, rfl⟩
rcases prime_mul_iff.mp hp with (⟨_, rfl⟩ | ⟨_, rfl⟩)
· exact mul_one _
· exact (a1 rfl).elim
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_eq Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_eq
section MinFac
theorem minFac_lemma (n k : ℕ) (h : ¬n < k * k) : sqrt n - k < sqrt n + 2 - k :=
(tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right <| le_sqrt.2 <| le_of_not_gt h).2 <| Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (by decide)
#align nat.min_fac_lemma Nat.minFac_lemma
/--
If `n < k * k`, then `minFacAux n k = n`, if `k | n`, then `minFacAux n k = k`.
Otherwise, `minFacAux n k = minFacAux n (k+2)` using well-founded recursion.
If `n` is odd and `1 < n`, then `minFacAux n 3` is the smallest prime factor of `n`.
By default this well-founded recursion would be irreducible.
This prevents use `decide` to resolve `Nat.prime n` for small values of `n`,
so we mark this as `@[semireducible]`.
In future, we may want to remove this annotation and instead use `norm_num` instead of `decide`
in these situations.
-/
@[semireducible] def minFacAux (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| k =>
if n < k * k then n
else
if k ∣ n then k
else
minFacAux n (k + 2)
termination_by k => sqrt n + 2 - k
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply minFac_lemma n k; assumption
#align nat.min_fac_aux Nat.minFacAux
/-- Returns the smallest prime factor of `n ≠ 1`. -/
def minFac (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if 2 ∣ n then 2 else minFacAux n 3
#align nat.min_fac Nat.minFac
@[simp]
theorem minFac_zero : minFac 0 = 2 :=
rfl
#align nat.min_fac_zero Nat.minFac_zero
@[simp]
theorem minFac_one : minFac 1 = 1 := by
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
#align nat.min_fac_one Nat.minFac_one
@[simp]
theorem minFac_two : minFac 2 = 2 := by
simp [minFac, minFacAux]
theorem minFac_eq (n : ℕ) : minFac n = if 2 ∣ n then 2 else minFacAux n 3 := rfl
#align nat.min_fac_eq Nat.minFac_eq
private def minFacProp (n k : ℕ) :=
2 ≤ k ∧ k ∣ n ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m
theorem minFacAux_has_prop {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) :
∀ k i, k = 2 * i + 3 → (∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m) → minFacProp n (minFacAux n k)
| k => fun i e a => by
rw [minFacAux]
by_cases h : n < k * k <;> simp [h]
· have pp : Prime n :=
prime_def_le_sqrt.2
⟨n2, fun m m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge l <| lt_of_lt_of_le (sqrt_lt.2 h) (a m m2 d)⟩
exact ⟨n2, dvd_rfl, fun m m2 d => le_of_eq ((dvd_prime_two_le pp m2).1 d).symm⟩
have k2 : 2 ≤ k := by
subst e
apply Nat.le_add_left
by_cases dk : k ∣ n <;> simp [dk]
· exact ⟨k2, dk, a⟩
· refine
have := minFac_lemma n k h
minFacAux_has_prop n2 (k + 2) (i + 1) (by simp [k, e, left_distrib, add_right_comm])
fun m m2 d => ?_
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (a m m2 d) with me | ml
· subst me
contradiction
apply (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ml).resolve_left
intro me
rw [← me, e] at d
have d' : 2 * (i + 2) ∣ n := d
have := a _ le_rfl (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd d')
rw [e] at this
exact absurd this (by contradiction)
termination_by k => sqrt n + 2 - k
#align nat.min_fac_aux_has_prop Nat.minFacAux_has_prop
theorem minFac_has_prop {n : ℕ} (n1 : n ≠ 1) : minFacProp n (minFac n) := by
by_cases n0 : n = 0
· simp [n0, minFacProp, GE.ge]
have n2 : 2 ≤ n := by
revert n0 n1
rcases n with (_ | _ | _) <;> simp [succ_le_succ]
simp only [minFac_eq, Nat.isUnit_iff]
by_cases d2 : 2 ∣ n <;> simp [d2]
· exact ⟨le_rfl, d2, fun k k2 _ => k2⟩
· refine
minFacAux_has_prop n2 3 0 rfl fun m m2 d => (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le m2).resolve_left (mt ?_ d2)
exact fun e => e.symm ▸ d
#align nat.min_fac_has_prop Nat.minFac_has_prop
theorem minFac_dvd (n : ℕ) : minFac n ∣ n :=
if n1 : n = 1 then by simp [n1] else (minFac_has_prop n1).2.1
#align nat.min_fac_dvd Nat.minFac_dvd
theorem minFac_prime {n : ℕ} (n1 : n ≠ 1) : Prime (minFac n) :=
let ⟨f2, fd, a⟩ := minFac_has_prop n1
prime_def_lt'.2 ⟨f2, fun m m2 l d => not_le_of_gt l (a m m2 (d.trans fd))⟩
#align nat.min_fac_prime Nat.minFac_prime
theorem minFac_le_of_dvd {n : ℕ} : ∀ {m : ℕ}, 2 ≤ m → m ∣ n → minFac n ≤ m := by
by_cases n1 : n = 1 <;> [exact fun m2 _ => n1.symm ▸ le_trans (by simp) m2;
apply (minFac_has_prop n1).2.2]
#align nat.min_fac_le_of_dvd Nat.minFac_le_of_dvd
theorem minFac_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < minFac n := by
by_cases n1 : n = 1 <;> [exact n1.symm ▸ (by simp); exact (minFac_prime n1).pos]
#align nat.min_fac_pos Nat.minFac_pos
theorem minFac_le {n : ℕ} (H : 0 < n) : minFac n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd H (minFac_dvd n)
#align nat.min_fac_le Nat.minFac_le
theorem le_minFac {m n : ℕ} : n = 1 ∨ m ≤ minFac n ↔ ∀ p, Prime p → p ∣ n → m ≤ p :=
⟨fun h p pp d =>
h.elim (by rintro rfl; cases pp.not_dvd_one d) fun h =>
le_trans h <| minFac_le_of_dvd pp.two_le d,
fun H => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun n1 => H _ (minFac_prime n1) (minFac_dvd _)⟩
#align nat.le_min_fac Nat.le_minFac
theorem le_minFac' {m n : ℕ} : n = 1 ∨ m ≤ minFac n ↔ ∀ p, 2 ≤ p → p ∣ n → m ≤ p :=
⟨fun h p (pp : 1 < p) d =>
h.elim (by rintro rfl; cases not_le_of_lt pp (le_of_dvd (by decide) d)) fun h =>
le_trans h <| minFac_le_of_dvd pp d,
fun H => le_minFac.2 fun p pp d => H p pp.two_le d⟩
#align nat.le_min_fac' Nat.le_minFac'
theorem prime_def_minFac {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ minFac p = p :=
⟨fun pp =>
⟨pp.two_le,
let ⟨f2, fd, _⟩ := minFac_has_prop <| ne_of_gt pp.one_lt
((dvd_prime pp).1 fd).resolve_left (ne_of_gt f2)⟩,
fun ⟨p2, e⟩ => e ▸ minFac_prime (ne_of_gt p2)⟩
#align nat.prime_def_min_fac Nat.prime_def_minFac
@[simp]
theorem Prime.minFac_eq {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : minFac p = p :=
(prime_def_minFac.1 hp).2
#align nat.prime.min_fac_eq Nat.Prime.minFac_eq
/-- This instance is faster in the virtual machine than `decidablePrime1`,
but slower in the kernel.
If you need to prove that a particular number is prime, in any case
you should not use `by decide`, but rather `by norm_num`, which is
much faster.
-/
instance decidablePrime (p : ℕ) : Decidable (Prime p) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ prime_def_minFac
#align nat.decidable_prime Nat.decidablePrime
theorem not_prime_iff_minFac_lt {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) : ¬Prime n ↔ minFac n < n :=
(not_congr <| prime_def_minFac.trans <| and_iff_right n2).trans <|
(lt_iff_le_and_ne.trans <| and_iff_right <| minFac_le <| le_of_succ_le n2).symm
#align nat.not_prime_iff_min_fac_lt Nat.not_prime_iff_minFac_lt
theorem minFac_le_div {n : ℕ} (pos : 0 < n) (np : ¬Prime n) : minFac n ≤ n / minFac n :=
match minFac_dvd n with
| ⟨0, h0⟩ => absurd pos <| by rw [h0, mul_zero]; decide
| ⟨1, h1⟩ => by
rw [mul_one] at h1
rw [prime_def_minFac, not_and_or, ← h1, eq_self_iff_true, _root_.not_true, or_false_iff,
not_le] at np
rw [le_antisymm (le_of_lt_succ np) (succ_le_of_lt pos), minFac_one, Nat.div_one]
| ⟨x + 2, hx⟩ => by
conv_rhs =>
congr
rw [hx]
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (minFac_pos _)]
exact minFac_le_of_dvd (le_add_left 2 x) ⟨minFac n, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
#align nat.min_fac_le_div Nat.minFac_le_div
/-- The square of the smallest prime factor of a composite number `n` is at most `n`.
-/
theorem minFac_sq_le_self {n : ℕ} (w : 0 < n) (h : ¬Prime n) : minFac n ^ 2 ≤ n :=
have t : minFac n ≤ n / minFac n := minFac_le_div w h
calc
minFac n ^ 2 = minFac n * minFac n := sq (minFac n)
_ ≤ n / minFac n * minFac n := Nat.mul_le_mul_right (minFac n) t
_ ≤ n := div_mul_le_self n (minFac n)
#align nat.min_fac_sq_le_self Nat.minFac_sq_le_self
@[simp]
theorem minFac_eq_one_iff {n : ℕ} : minFac n = 1 ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hn
have := minFac_prime hn
rw [h] at this
exact not_prime_one this
· rintro rfl
rfl
#align nat.min_fac_eq_one_iff Nat.minFac_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem minFac_eq_two_iff (n : ℕ) : minFac n = 2 ↔ 2 ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact minFac_dvd n
· intro h
have ub := minFac_le_of_dvd (le_refl 2) h
have lb := minFac_pos n
refine ub.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h' => ?_
have := le_antisymm (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lb) (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h')
rw [eq_comm, Nat.minFac_eq_one_iff] at this
subst this
exact not_lt_of_le (le_of_dvd zero_lt_one h) one_lt_two
#align nat.min_fac_eq_two_iff Nat.minFac_eq_two_iff
end MinFac
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) (np : ¬Prime n) : ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_dvd _, ne_of_gt (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt n2)).one_lt,
ne_of_lt <| (not_prime_iff_minFac_lt n2).1 np⟩
#align nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime Nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 {n : ℕ} (n2 : 2 ≤ n) (np : ¬Prime n) :
∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ 2 ≤ m ∧ m < n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_dvd _, (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt n2)).two_le,
(not_prime_iff_minFac_lt n2).1 np⟩
#align nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 Nat.exists_dvd_of_not_prime2
theorem not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (h1 : m ∣ n) (h2 : m ≠ 1) (h3 : m ≠ n) : ¬Prime n :=
fun h => Or.elim (h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd m h1) h2 h3
theorem not_prime_of_dvd_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (h1 : m ∣ n) (h2 : 2 ≤ m) (h3 : m < n) : ¬Prime n :=
not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne h1 (ne_of_gt h2) (ne_of_lt h3)
theorem not_prime_iff_exists_dvd_ne {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : (¬Prime n) ↔ ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n :=
⟨exists_dvd_of_not_prime h, fun ⟨_, h1, h2, h3⟩ => not_prime_of_dvd_of_ne h1 h2 h3⟩
theorem not_prime_iff_exists_dvd_lt {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : (¬Prime n) ↔ ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ 2 ≤ m ∧ m < n :=
⟨exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 h, fun ⟨_, h1, h2, h3⟩ => not_prime_of_dvd_of_lt h1 h2 h3⟩
theorem exists_prime_and_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ∃ p, Prime p ∧ p ∣ n :=
⟨minFac n, minFac_prime hn, minFac_dvd _⟩
#align nat.exists_prime_and_dvd Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd
theorem dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd {a b : ℕ}
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ a → p * a ∣ b) : a ∣ b := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 1
· apply one_dvd
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_prime_and_dvd ha
exact _root_.trans (dvd_mul_left a p) (hdvd p hp.1 hp.2)
#align nat.dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd Nat.dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
/-- Euclid's theorem on the **infinitude of primes**.
Here given in the form: for every `n`, there exists a prime number `p ≥ n`. -/
theorem exists_infinite_primes (n : ℕ) : ∃ p, n ≤ p ∧ Prime p :=
let p := minFac (n ! + 1)
have f1 : n ! + 1 ≠ 1 := ne_of_gt <| succ_lt_succ <| factorial_pos _
have pp : Prime p := minFac_prime f1
have np : n ≤ p :=
le_of_not_ge fun h =>
have h₁ : p ∣ n ! := dvd_factorial (minFac_pos _) h
have h₂ : p ∣ 1 := (Nat.dvd_add_iff_right h₁).2 (minFac_dvd _)
pp.not_dvd_one h₂
⟨p, np, pp⟩
#align nat.exists_infinite_primes Nat.exists_infinite_primes
/-- A version of `Nat.exists_infinite_primes` using the `BddAbove` predicate. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_setOf_prime : ¬BddAbove { p | Prime p } := by
rw [not_bddAbove_iff]
intro n
obtain ⟨p, hi, hp⟩ := exists_infinite_primes n.succ
exact ⟨p, hp, hi⟩
#align nat.not_bdd_above_set_of_prime Nat.not_bddAbove_setOf_prime
theorem Prime.eq_two_or_odd {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p = 2 ∨ p % 2 = 1 :=
p.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one.imp_left fun h =>
((hp.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd 2 (dvd_of_mod_eq_zero h)).resolve_left (by decide)).symm
#align nat.prime.eq_two_or_odd Nat.Prime.eq_two_or_odd
theorem Prime.eq_two_or_odd' {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p = 2 ∨ Odd p :=
Or.imp_right (fun h => ⟨p / 2, (div_add_mod p 2).symm.trans (congr_arg _ h)⟩) hp.eq_two_or_odd
#align nat.prime.eq_two_or_odd' Nat.Prime.eq_two_or_odd'
theorem Prime.even_iff {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : Even p ↔ p = 2 := by
rw [even_iff_two_dvd, prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq prime_two hp, eq_comm]
#align nat.prime.even_iff Nat.Prime.even_iff
theorem Prime.odd_of_ne_two {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h_two : p ≠ 2) : Odd p :=
hp.eq_two_or_odd'.resolve_left h_two
#align nat.prime.odd_of_ne_two Nat.Prime.odd_of_ne_two
theorem Prime.even_sub_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h2 : p ≠ 2) : Even (p - 1) :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hp.odd_of_ne_two h2; ⟨n, by rw [hn, Nat.add_sub_cancel, two_mul]⟩
#align nat.prime.even_sub_one Nat.Prime.even_sub_one
/-- A prime `p` satisfies `p % 2 = 1` if and only if `p ≠ 2`. -/
theorem Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] : p % 2 = 1 ↔ p ≠ 2 := by
refine ⟨fun h hf => ?_, (Nat.Prime.eq_two_or_odd <| @Fact.out p.Prime _).resolve_left⟩
rw [hf] at h
simp at h
#align nat.prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two Nat.Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two
theorem coprime_of_dvd {m n : ℕ} (H : ∀ k, Prime k → k ∣ m → ¬k ∣ n) : Coprime m n := by
rw [coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one]
by_contra g2
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpdvd⟩ := exists_prime_and_dvd g2
apply H p hp <;> apply dvd_trans hpdvd
· exact gcd_dvd_left _ _
· exact gcd_dvd_right _ _
#align nat.coprime_of_dvd Nat.coprime_of_dvd
theorem coprime_of_dvd' {m n : ℕ} (H : ∀ k, Prime k → k ∣ m → k ∣ n → k ∣ 1) : Coprime m n :=
coprime_of_dvd fun k kp km kn => not_le_of_gt kp.one_lt <| le_of_dvd zero_lt_one <| H k kp km kn
#align nat.coprime_of_dvd' Nat.coprime_of_dvd'
theorem factors_lemma {k} : (k + 2) / minFac (k + 2) < k + 2 :=
div_lt_self (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) (minFac_prime (by
apply Nat.ne_of_gt
apply Nat.succ_lt_succ
apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
)).one_lt
#align nat.factors_lemma Nat.factors_lemma
theorem Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : Coprime p n ↔ ¬p ∣ n :=
⟨fun co d => pp.not_dvd_one <| co.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left (by simp [d]), fun nd =>
coprime_of_dvd fun m m2 mp => ((prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq m2 pp).1 mp).symm ▸ nd⟩
#align nat.prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_not_coprime {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : p ∣ n ↔ ¬Coprime p n :=
iff_not_comm.2 pp.coprime_iff_not_dvd
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_not_coprime Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_not_coprime
theorem Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ} : ¬Coprime m n ↔ ∃ p, Prime p ∧ p ∣ m ∧ p ∣ n := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro h
exact
⟨minFac (gcd m n), minFac_prime h, (minFac_dvd (gcd m n)).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n),
(minFac_dvd (gcd m n)).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)⟩
· intro h
cases' h with p hp
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (Prime.one_lt hp.1) hp.2.1 hp.2.2
#align nat.prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_mul {p m n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : p ∣ m * n ↔ p ∣ m ∨ p ∣ n :=
⟨fun H => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => (pp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).dvd_of_dvd_mul_left H,
Or.rec (fun h : p ∣ m => h.mul_right _) fun h : p ∣ n => h.mul_left _⟩
#align nat.prime.dvd_mul Nat.Prime.dvd_mul
theorem Prime.not_dvd_mul {p m n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (Hm : ¬p ∣ m) (Hn : ¬p ∣ n) : ¬p ∣ m * n :=
mt pp.dvd_mul.1 <| by simp [Hm, Hn]
#align nat.prime.not_dvd_mul Nat.Prime.not_dvd_mul
@[simp] lemma coprime_two_left : Coprime 2 n ↔ Odd n := by
rw [prime_two.coprime_iff_not_dvd, odd_iff_not_even, even_iff_two_dvd]
@[simp] lemma coprime_two_right : n.Coprime 2 ↔ Odd n := coprime_comm.trans coprime_two_left
alias ⟨Coprime.odd_of_left, _root_.Odd.coprime_two_left⟩ := coprime_two_left
alias ⟨Coprime.odd_of_right, _root_.Odd.coprime_two_right⟩ := coprime_two_right
theorem prime_iff {p : ℕ} : p.Prime ↔ _root_.Prime p :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.ne_zero, h.not_unit, fun _ _ => h.dvd_mul.mp⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩
#align nat.prime_iff Nat.prime_iff
alias ⟨Prime.prime, _root_.Prime.nat_prime⟩ := prime_iff
#align nat.prime.prime Nat.Prime.prime
#align prime.nat_prime Prime.nat_prime
-- Porting note: attributes `protected`, `nolint dup_namespace` removed
theorem irreducible_iff_prime {p : ℕ} : Irreducible p ↔ _root_.Prime p :=
prime_iff
#align nat.irreducible_iff_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_prime
theorem Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow {p m n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (h : p ∣ m ^ n) : p ∣ m :=
pp.prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow h
#align nat.prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow Nat.Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow
theorem Prime.not_prime_pow' {x n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ¬(x ^ n).Prime :=
not_irreducible_pow hn
#align nat.prime.pow_not_prime' Nat.Prime.not_prime_pow'
theorem Prime.not_prime_pow {x n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : ¬(x ^ n).Prime :=
not_prime_pow' ((two_le_iff _).mp hn).2
#align nat.prime.pow_not_prime Nat.Prime.not_prime_pow
theorem Prime.eq_one_of_pow {x n : ℕ} (h : (x ^ n).Prime) : n = 1 :=
not_imp_not.mp Prime.not_prime_pow' h
#align nat.prime.eq_one_of_pow Nat.Prime.eq_one_of_pow
theorem Prime.pow_eq_iff {p a k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : a ^ k = p ↔ a = p ∧ k = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [h.1, h.2, pow_one]⟩
rw [← h] at hp
rw [← h, hp.eq_one_of_pow, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff, pow_one]
#align nat.prime.pow_eq_iff Nat.Prime.pow_eq_iff
theorem pow_minFac {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : (n ^ k).minFac = n.minFac := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 1 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
have hnk : n ^ k ≠ 1 := fun hk' => hn ((pow_eq_one_iff hk).1 hk')
apply (minFac_le_of_dvd (minFac_prime hn).two_le ((minFac_dvd n).pow hk)).antisymm
apply
minFac_le_of_dvd (minFac_prime hnk).two_le
((minFac_prime hnk).dvd_of_dvd_pow (minFac_dvd _))
#align nat.pow_min_fac Nat.pow_minFac
theorem Prime.pow_minFac {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) : (p ^ k).minFac = p := by
rw [Nat.pow_minFac hk, hp.minFac_eq]
#align nat.prime.pow_min_fac Nat.Prime.pow_minFac
theorem Prime.mul_eq_prime_sq_iff {x y p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hx : x ≠ 1) (hy : y ≠ 1) :
x * y = p ^ 2 ↔ x = p ∧ y = p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₁.symm ▸ h₂.symm ▸ (sq _).symm⟩
have pdvdxy : p ∣ x * y := by rw [h]; simp [sq]
-- Could be `wlog := hp.dvd_mul.1 pdvdxy using x y`, but that imports more than we want.
suffices ∀ x' y' : ℕ, x' ≠ 1 → y' ≠ 1 → x' * y' = p ^ 2 → p ∣ x' → x' = p ∧ y' = p by
obtain hx | hy := hp.dvd_mul.1 pdvdxy <;>
[skip; rw [And.comm]] <;>
[skip; rw [mul_comm] at h pdvdxy] <;>
apply this <;>
assumption
rintro x y hx hy h ⟨a, ha⟩
have : a ∣ p := ⟨y, by rwa [ha, sq, mul_assoc, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero, eq_comm] at h⟩
obtain ha1 | hap := (Nat.dvd_prime hp).mp ‹a ∣ p›
· subst ha1
rw [mul_one] at ha
subst ha
simp only [sq, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero] at h
subst h
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· refine (hy ?_).elim
subst hap
subst ha
rw [sq, Nat.mul_right_eq_self_iff (Nat.mul_pos hp.pos hp.pos : 0 < a * a)] at h
exact h
#align nat.prime.mul_eq_prime_sq_iff Nat.Prime.mul_eq_prime_sq_iff
theorem Prime.dvd_factorial : ∀ {n p : ℕ} (_ : Prime p), p ∣ n ! ↔ p ≤ n
| 0, p, hp => iff_of_false hp.not_dvd_one (not_le_of_lt hp.pos)
| n + 1, p, hp => by
rw [factorial_succ, hp.dvd_mul, Prime.dvd_factorial hp]
exact
⟨fun h => h.elim (le_of_dvd (succ_pos _)) le_succ_of_le, fun h =>
(_root_.lt_or_eq_of_le h).elim (Or.inr ∘ le_of_lt_succ) fun h => Or.inl <| by rw [h]⟩
#align nat.prime.dvd_factorial Nat.Prime.dvd_factorial
theorem Prime.coprime_pow_of_not_dvd {p m a : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (h : ¬p ∣ a) : Coprime a (p ^ m) :=
(pp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).symm.pow_right _
#align nat.prime.coprime_pow_of_not_dvd Nat.Prime.coprime_pow_of_not_dvd
theorem coprime_primes {p q : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (pq : Prime q) : Coprime p q ↔ p ≠ q :=
pp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.trans <| not_congr <| dvd_prime_two_le pq pp.two_le
#align nat.coprime_primes Nat.coprime_primes
theorem coprime_pow_primes {p q : ℕ} (n m : ℕ) (pp : Prime p) (pq : Prime q) (h : p ≠ q) :
Coprime (p ^ n) (q ^ m) :=
((coprime_primes pp pq).2 h).pow _ _
#align nat.coprime_pow_primes Nat.coprime_pow_primes
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Prime.lean | 701 | 702 | theorem coprime_or_dvd_of_prime {p} (pp : Prime p) (i : ℕ) : Coprime p i ∨ p ∣ i := by |
rw [pp.dvd_iff_not_coprime]; apply em
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.RiemannZeta
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.GammaDeriv
/-!
# Asymptotics of `ζ s` as `s → 1`
The goal of this file is to evaluate the limit of `ζ s - 1 / (s - 1)` as `s → 1`.
### Main results
* `tendsto_riemannZeta_sub_one_div`: the limit of `ζ s - 1 / (s - 1)`, at the filter of punctured
neighbourhoods of 1 in `ℂ`, exists and is equal to the Euler-Mascheroni constant `γ`.
* `riemannZeta_one_ne_zero`: with our definition of `ζ 1` (which is characterised as the limit of
`ζ s - 1 / (s - 1) / Gammaℝ s` as `s → 1`), we have `ζ 1 ≠ 0`.
### Outline of arguments
We consider the sum `F s = ∑' n : ℕ, f (n + 1) s`, where `s` is a real variable and
`f n s = ∫ x in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1)`. We show that `F s` is continuous on `[1, ∞)`,
that `F 1 = 1 - γ`, and that `F s = 1 / (s - 1) - ζ s / s` for `1 < s`.
By combining these formulae, one deduces that the limit of `ζ s - 1 / (s - 1)` at `𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ)`
exists and is equal to `γ`. Finally, using this and the Riemann removable singularity criterion
we obtain the limit along punctured neighbourhoods of 1 in `ℂ`.
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Topology
@[inherit_doc] local notation "γ" => eulerMascheroniConstant
namespace ZetaAsymptotics
-- since the intermediate lemmas are of little interest in themselves we put them in a namespace
/-!
## Definitions
-/
/-- Auxiliary function used in studying zeta-function asymptotics. -/
noncomputable def term (n : ℕ) (s : ℝ) : ℝ := ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1)
/-- Sum of finitely many `term`s. -/
noncomputable def term_sum (s : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : ℝ := ∑ n ∈ Finset.range N, term (n + 1) s
/-- Topological sum of `term`s. -/
noncomputable def term_tsum (s : ℝ) : ℝ := ∑' n, term (n + 1) s
lemma term_nonneg (n : ℕ) (s : ℝ) : 0 ≤ term n s := by
rw [term, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by simp)]
refine setIntegral_nonneg measurableSet_Ioc (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
refine div_nonneg ?_ (rpow_nonneg ?_ _)
all_goals linarith [hx.1]
lemma term_welldef {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1)) volume n (n + 1) := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le (by linarith)]
refine (ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun x hx ↦ ContinuousAt.div ?_ ?_ ?_).integrableOn_Icc
· fun_prop
· apply continuousAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inr <| by linarith)
· exact (rpow_pos_of_pos ((Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn).trans_le hx.1) _).ne'
section s_eq_one
/-!
## Evaluation of the sum for `s = 1`
-/
lemma term_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
term n 1 = (log (n + 1) - log n) - 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hv : ∀ x ∈ uIcc (n : ℝ) (n + 1), 0 < x := by
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one])] at hx
exact (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn).trans_le hx.1
calc term n 1
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [term, one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_two (R := ℝ), rpow_natCast]
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (1 / x - n / x ^ 2) := by
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
field_simp [(hv x hx).ne']
ring
_ = (∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), 1 / x) - n * ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), 1 / x ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [← mul_one_div (n : ℝ)]
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_sub]
· simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
· exact intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_one_div (fun x hx ↦ (hv x hx).ne') (by fun_prop)
· exact (intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_one_div
(fun x hx ↦ (sq_pos_of_pos (hv x hx)).ne') (by fun_prop)).const_mul _
_ = (log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n) - n * ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), 1 / x ^ 2 := by
congr 1
rw [integral_one_div_of_pos, log_div]
all_goals positivity
_ = (log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n) - n * ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), x ^ (-2 : ℝ) := by
congr 2
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [rpow_neg, one_div, ← Nat.cast_two (R := ℝ), rpow_natCast]
exact (hv x hx).le
_ = log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n - n * (1 / n - 1 / (n + 1)) := by
rw [integral_rpow]
· simp_rw [sub_div, (by norm_num : (-2 : ℝ) + 1 = -1), div_neg, div_one, neg_sub_neg,
rpow_neg_one, ← one_div]
· refine Or.inr ⟨by norm_num, not_mem_uIcc_of_lt ?_ ?_⟩
all_goals positivity
_ = log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n - 1 / (↑n + 1) := by
congr 1
field_simp
lemma term_sum_one (N : ℕ) : term_sum 1 N = log (N + 1) - harmonic (N + 1) + 1 := by
induction' N with N hN
· simp_rw [term_sum, Finset.sum_range_zero, harmonic_succ, harmonic_zero,
Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, Nat.cast_one, inv_one, Rat.cast_one, log_one, sub_add_cancel]
· unfold term_sum at hN ⊢
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, hN, harmonic_succ (N + 1),
term_one (by positivity : 0 < N + 1)]
push_cast
ring_nf
/-- The topological sum of `ZetaAsymptotics.term (n + 1) 1` over all `n : ℕ` is `1 - γ`. This is
proved by directly evaluating the sum of the first `N` terms and using the limit definition of `γ`.
-/
lemma term_tsum_one : HasSum (fun n ↦ term (n + 1) 1) (1 - γ) := by
rw [hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (fun n ↦ term_nonneg (n + 1) 1)]
show Tendsto (fun N ↦ term_sum 1 N) atTop _
simp_rw [term_sum_one, sub_eq_neg_add]
refine Tendsto.add ?_ tendsto_const_nhds
have := (tendsto_eulerMascheroniSeq'.comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1)).neg
refine this.congr' (eventually_of_forall (fun n ↦ ?_))
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, eulerMascheroniSeq', if_false]
push_cast
abel
end s_eq_one
section s_gt_one
/-!
## Evaluation of the sum for `1 < s`
-/
lemma term_of_lt {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
term n s = 1 / (s - 1) * (1 / n ^ (s - 1) - 1 / (n + 1) ^ (s - 1))
- n / s * (1 / n ^ s - 1 / (n + 1) ^ s) := by
have hv : ∀ x ∈ uIcc (n : ℝ) (n + 1), 0 < x := by
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one])] at hx
exact (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn).trans_le hx.1
calc term n s
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1) := by rfl
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x ^ (-s) - n * x ^ (-(s + 1))) := by
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [sub_div, rpow_add_one (hv x hx).ne', mul_comm, ← div_div, div_self (hv x hx).ne',
rpow_neg (hv x hx).le, rpow_neg (hv x hx).le, one_div, rpow_add_one (hv x hx).ne', mul_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv]
_ = (∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), x ^ (-s)) - n * (∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), x ^ (-(s + 1))) := by
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_sub, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul] <;>
[skip; apply IntervalIntegrable.const_mul] <;>
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow (Or.inr <| not_mem_uIcc_of_lt ?_ ?_)
· exact_mod_cast hn
· linarith
_ = 1 / (s - 1) * (1 / n ^ (s - 1) - 1 / (n + 1) ^ (s - 1))
- n / s * (1 / n ^ s - 1 / (n + 1) ^ s) := by
have : 0 ∉ uIcc (n : ℝ) (n + 1) := (lt_irrefl _ <| hv _ ·)
rw [integral_rpow (Or.inr ⟨by linarith, this⟩), integral_rpow (Or.inr ⟨by linarith, this⟩)]
congr 1
· rw [show -s + 1 = -(s - 1) by ring, div_neg, ← neg_div, mul_comm, mul_one_div, neg_sub,
rpow_neg (Nat.cast_nonneg _), one_div, rpow_neg (by linarith), one_div]
· rw [show -(s + 1) + 1 = -s by ring, div_neg, ← neg_div, neg_sub, div_mul_eq_mul_div,
mul_div_assoc, rpow_neg (Nat.cast_nonneg _), one_div, rpow_neg (by linarith), one_div]
lemma term_sum_of_lt (N : ℕ) {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
term_sum s N = 1 / (s - 1) * (1 - 1 / (N + 1) ^ (s - 1))
- 1 / s * ((∑ n ∈ Finset.range N, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) - N / (N + 1) ^ s) := by
simp only [term_sum]
conv => enter [1, 2, n]; rw [term_of_lt (by simp) hs]
rw [Finset.sum_sub_distrib]
congr 1
· induction' N with N hN
· simp
· rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, hN, Nat.cast_add_one]
ring_nf
· simp_rw [mul_comm (_ / _), ← mul_div_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv _ s, ← Finset.sum_mul, mul_one]
congr 1
induction' N with N hN
· simp
· simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, hN, Nat.cast_add_one, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
congr 1
ring_nf
/-- For `1 < s`, the topological sum of `ZetaAsymptotics.term (n + 1) s` over all `n : ℕ` is
`1 / (s - 1) - ζ s / s`.
-/
lemma term_tsum_of_lt {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
term_tsum s = (1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s * ∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) := by
apply HasSum.tsum_eq
rw [hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (fun n ↦ term_nonneg (n + 1) s)]
change Tendsto (fun N ↦ term_sum s N) atTop _
simp_rw [term_sum_of_lt _ hs]
apply Tendsto.sub
· rw [show 𝓝 (1 / (s - 1)) = 𝓝 (1 / (s - 1) - 1 / (s - 1) * 0) by simp]
simp_rw [mul_sub, mul_one]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.sub (Tendsto.const_mul _ ?_)
refine tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop <| (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by linarith)).comp ?_
exact tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
· rw [← sub_zero (tsum _)]
apply (((Summable.hasSum ?_).tendsto_sum_nat).sub ?_).const_mul
· exact_mod_cast (summable_nat_add_iff 1).mpr (summable_one_div_nat_rpow.mpr hs)
· apply tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
· change Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (1 / ↑(n + 1) : ℝ) ^ (s - 1)) ..
rw [show 𝓝 (0 : ℝ) = 𝓝 (0 ^ (s - 1)) by rw [zero_rpow]; linarith]
refine Tendsto.rpow_const ?_ (Or.inr <| by linarith)
exact (tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat _).comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat _)
· intro n
positivity
· intro n
dsimp only
transitivity (n + 1) / (n + 1) ^ s
· gcongr
linarith
· apply le_of_eq
rw [rpow_sub_one, ← div_mul, div_one, mul_comm, one_div, inv_rpow, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
· norm_cast
all_goals positivity
/-- Reformulation of `ZetaAsymptotics.term_tsum_of_lt` which is useful for some computations
below. -/
lemma zeta_limit_aux1 {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
(∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) - 1 / (s - 1) = 1 - s * term_tsum s := by
rw [term_tsum_of_lt hs]
generalize (∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) = Z
field_simp [(show s - 1 ≠ 0 by linarith)]
ring_nf
end s_gt_one
section continuity
/-!
## Continuity of the sum
-/
lemma continuousOn_term (n : ℕ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ term (n + 1) x) (Ici 1) := by
-- TODO: can this be shortened using the lemma
-- `continuous_parametric_intervalIntegral_of_continuous'` from #11185?
simp only [term, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by linarith : (↑(n + 1) : ℝ) ≤ ↑(n + 1) + 1)]
apply continuousOn_of_dominated (bound := fun x ↦ (x - ↑(n + 1)) / x ^ (2 : ℝ))
· exact fun s hs ↦ (term_welldef (by simp) (zero_lt_one.trans_le hs)).1.1
· intro s (hs : 1 ≤ s)
rw [ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioc]
filter_upwards with x hx
have : 0 < x := lt_trans (by positivity) hx.1
rw [norm_of_nonneg (div_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr hx.1.le) (by positivity)), Nat.cast_add_one]
apply div_le_div_of_nonneg_left
· exact_mod_cast sub_nonneg.mpr hx.1.le
· positivity
· exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (le_trans (by simp) hx.1.le) (by linarith)
· rw [← IntegrableOn, ← intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (by linarith)]
exact_mod_cast term_welldef (by linarith : 0 < (n + 1)) zero_lt_one
· rw [ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioc]
filter_upwards with x hx
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn (fun s (hs : 1 ≤ s) ↦ continuousAt_const.div ?_ ?_)
· exact continuousAt_const.rpow (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) (Or.inr (by linarith))
· exact (rpow_pos_of_pos ((Nat.cast_pos.mpr (by simp)).trans hx.1) _).ne'
lemma continuousOn_term_tsum : ContinuousOn term_tsum (Ici 1) := by
-- We use dominated convergence, using `fun n ↦ term n 1` as our uniform bound (since `term` is
-- monotone decreasing in `s`.)
refine continuousOn_tsum (fun i ↦ continuousOn_term _) term_tsum_one.summable (fun n s hs ↦ ?_)
rw [term, term, norm_of_nonneg]
· simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by linarith : (↑(n + 1) : ℝ) ≤ ↑(n + 1) + 1)]
refine setIntegral_mono_on ?_ ?_ measurableSet_Ioc (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
· exact (term_welldef n.succ_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le hs)).1
· exact (term_welldef n.succ_pos zero_lt_one).1
· rw [div_le_div_left] -- leave side-goals to end and kill them all together
· apply rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
· exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (by simp) hx.1).le
· linarith [mem_Ici.mp hs]
· linarith [hx.1]
all_goals apply rpow_pos_of_pos ((Nat.cast_nonneg _).trans_lt hx.1)
· rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by linarith)]
refine setIntegral_nonneg measurableSet_Ioc (fun x hx ↦ div_nonneg ?_ (rpow_nonneg ?_ _))
all_goals linarith [hx.1]
/-- First version of the limit formula, with a limit over real numbers tending to 1 from above. -/
lemma tendsto_riemannZeta_sub_one_div_nhds_right :
Tendsto (fun s : ℝ ↦ riemannZeta s - 1 / (s - 1)) (𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 γ) := by
suffices Tendsto (fun s : ℝ ↦ (∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) - 1 / (s - 1))
(𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 γ) by
apply ((Complex.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp this).congr'
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with s hs
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_one, sub_left_inj, Complex.ofReal_tsum]
rw [zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow (by simpa using hs)]
congr 1 with n
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow (by positivity)]
norm_cast
suffices aux2 : Tendsto (fun s : ℝ ↦ (∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) - 1 / (s - 1))
(𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 (1 - term_tsum 1)) by
have := term_tsum_one.tsum_eq
rw [← term_tsum, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq'] at this
simpa only [this] using aux2
apply Tendsto.congr'
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with s hs using (zeta_limit_aux1 hs).symm
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.sub
rw [← one_mul (term_tsum 1)]
apply (tendsto_id.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds).mul
have := continuousOn_term_tsum.continuousWithinAt left_mem_Ici
exact Tendsto.mono_left this (nhdsWithin_mono _ Ioi_subset_Ici_self)
/-- The function `ζ s - 1 / (s - 1)` tends to `γ` as `s → 1`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Harmonic/ZetaAsymp.lean | 315 | 346 | theorem _root_.tendsto_riemannZeta_sub_one_div :
Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ riemannZeta s - 1 / (s - 1)) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 γ) := by |
-- We use the removable-singularity theorem to show that *some* limit over `𝓝[≠] (1 : ℂ)` exists,
-- and then use the previous result to deduce that this limit must be `γ`.
let f (s : ℂ) := riemannZeta s - 1 / (s - 1)
suffices ∃ C, Tendsto f (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 C) by
cases' this with C hC
suffices Tendsto (fun s : ℝ ↦ f s) _ _
from (tendsto_nhds_unique this tendsto_riemannZeta_sub_one_div_nhds_right) ▸ hC
refine hC.comp (tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ ?_ ?_)
· exact (Complex.continuous_ofReal.tendsto 1).mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ..)
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with a ha
rw [mem_compl_singleton_iff, ← Complex.ofReal_one, Ne, Complex.ofReal_inj]
exact ne_of_gt ha
refine ⟨_, Complex.tendsto_limUnder_of_differentiable_on_punctured_nhds_of_isLittleO ?_ ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with s hs
refine (differentiableAt_riemannZeta hs).sub ((differentiableAt_const _).div ?_ ?_)
· fun_prop
· rwa [mem_compl_singleton_iff, ← sub_ne_zero] at hs
· refine Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_tendsto' ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with t ht ht'
rw [inv_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at ht'
tauto
· simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv, sub_mul,
(by ring_nf : 𝓝 (0 : ℂ) = 𝓝 ((1 - 1) - f 1 * (1 - 1)))]
apply Tendsto.sub
· simp_rw [mul_comm (f _), f, mul_sub]
apply riemannZeta_residue_one.sub
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ (tendsto_const_nhds.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx
field_simp [sub_ne_zero.mpr <| mem_compl_singleton_iff.mp hx]
· exact ((tendsto_id.sub tendsto_const_nhds).mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds).const_mul _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ArithMult
#align_import number_theory.arithmetic_function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
This file defines arithmetic functions, which are functions from `ℕ` to a specified type that map 0
to 0. In the literature, they are often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. These arithmetic
functions are endowed with a multiplication, given by Dirichlet convolution, and pointwise addition,
to form the Dirichlet ring.
## Main Definitions
* `ArithmeticFunction R` consists of functions `f : ℕ → R` such that `f 0 = 0`.
* An arithmetic function `f` `IsMultiplicative` when `x.coprime y → f (x * y) = f x * f y`.
* The pointwise operations `pmul` and `ppow` differ from the multiplication
and power instances on `ArithmeticFunction R`, which use Dirichlet multiplication.
* `ζ` is the arithmetic function such that `ζ x = 1` for `0 < x`.
* `σ k` is the arithmetic function such that `σ k x = ∑ y ∈ divisors x, y ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `pow k` is the arithmetic function such that `pow k x = x ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `id` is the identity arithmetic function on `ℕ`.
* `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`.
* `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n` counted with multiplicity.
* `μ` is the Möbius function (spelled `moebius` in code).
## Main Results
* Several forms of Möbius inversion:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
* And variants that apply when the equalities only hold on a set `S : Set ℕ` such that
`m ∣ n → n ∈ S → m ∈ S`:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
## Notation
All notation is localized in the namespace `ArithmeticFunction`.
The arithmetic functions `ζ`, `σ`, `ω`, `Ω` and `μ` have Greek letter names.
In addition, there are separate locales `ArithmeticFunction.zeta` for `ζ`,
`ArithmeticFunction.sigma` for `σ`, `ArithmeticFunction.omega` for `ω`,
`ArithmeticFunction.Omega` for `Ω`, and `ArithmeticFunction.Moebius` for `μ`,
to allow for selective access to these notations.
The arithmetic function $$n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$$ is given custom notation
`∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` when applied to `n`.
## Tags
arithmetic functions, dirichlet convolution, divisors
-/
open Finset
open Nat
variable (R : Type*)
/-- An arithmetic function is a function from `ℕ` that maps 0 to 0. In the literature, they are
often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. Multiplication on `ArithmeticFunctions` is by
Dirichlet convolution. -/
def ArithmeticFunction [Zero R] :=
ZeroHom ℕ R
#align nat.arithmetic_function ArithmeticFunction
instance ArithmeticFunction.zero [Zero R] : Zero (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Zero (ZeroHom ℕ R))
instance [Zero R] : Inhabited (ArithmeticFunction R) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZeroHom ℕ R))
variable {R}
namespace ArithmeticFunction
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
-- porting note: used to be `CoeFun`
instance : FunLike (ArithmeticFunction R) ℕ R :=
inferInstanceAs (FunLike (ZeroHom ℕ R) ℕ R)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.toFun = f := rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.to_fun_eq ArithmeticFunction.toFun_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) : @DFunLike.coe (ArithmeticFunction R) _ _ _
(ZeroHom.mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f 0 = 0 :=
ZeroHom.map_zero' f
#align nat.arithmetic_function.map_zero ArithmeticFunction.map_zero
theorem coe_inj {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f : ℕ → R) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_inj ArithmeticFunction.coe_inj
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : ℕ} : (0 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
ZeroHom.zero_apply x
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zero_apply ArithmeticFunction.zero_apply
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : ArithmeticFunction R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
ZeroHom.ext h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ext ArithmeticFunction.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ext_iff ArithmeticFunction.ext_iff
section One
variable [One R]
instance one : One (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨⟨fun x => ite (x = 1) 1 0, rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_apply {x : ℕ} : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = ite (x = 1) 1 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_apply ArithmeticFunction.one_apply
@[simp]
theorem one_one : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_one ArithmeticFunction.one_one
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 1) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
if_neg h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_apply_ne ArithmeticFunction.one_apply_ne
end One
end Zero
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℕ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `natCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe] -- Porting note: added `coe` tag.
def natToArithmeticFunction [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℕ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance natCoe [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℕ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨natToArithmeticFunction⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe ArithmeticFunction.natCoe
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_nat (f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : natToArithmeticFunction f = f :=
ext fun _ => cast_id _
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_nat ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_nat
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_apply [AddMonoidWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_apply ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_apply
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℤ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `intCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def ofInt [AddGroupWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℤ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance intCoe [AddGroupWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℤ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨ofInt⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe ArithmeticFunction.intCoe
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_int (f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ofInt f = f :=
ext fun _ => Int.cast_id
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_int ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_int
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_apply [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x := rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_apply ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
((f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = (f : ArithmeticFunction R) := by
ext
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_coe ArithmeticFunction.coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_one ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_one
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_one [AddGroupWithOne R] : ((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) :
ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_one ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_one
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid R]
instance add : Add (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => f n + g n, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} : (f + g) n = f n + g n :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_apply ArithmeticFunction.add_apply
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.zero R,
ArithmeticFunction.add with
add_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_assoc _ _ _
zero_add := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_add _
add_zero := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_zero _
nsmul := nsmulRec }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_monoid ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid
end AddMonoid
instance instAddMonoidWithOne [AddMonoidWithOne R] : AddMonoidWithOne (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.one with
natCast := fun n => ⟨fun x => if x = 1 then (n : R) else 0, by simp⟩
natCast_zero := by ext; simp
natCast_succ := fun n => by ext x; by_cases h : x = 1 <;> simp [h] }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.add_monoid_with_one ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with add_comm := fun _ _ => ext fun _ => add_comm _ _ }
instance [NegZeroClass R] : Neg (ArithmeticFunction R) where
neg f := ⟨fun n => -f n, by simp⟩
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with
add_left_neg := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_left_neg _
zsmul := zsmulRec }
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ show AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) by infer_instance with
add_comm := fun _ _ ↦ add_comm _ _ }
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [Zero R] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R M]
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance : SMul (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {g : ArithmeticFunction M} {n : ℕ} :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.smul_apply ArithmeticFunction.smul_apply
end SMul
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance [Semiring R] : Mul (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨(· • ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} :
(f * g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst * g x.snd :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.mul_apply
theorem mul_apply_one [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f * g) 1 = f 1 * g 1 := by simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_apply_one ArithmeticFunction.mul_apply_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCoe_mul [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = f * g := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.nat_coe_mul ArithmeticFunction.natCoe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCoe_mul [Ring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ↑f * g := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.int_coe_mul ArithmeticFunction.intCoe_mul
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem mul_smul' (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (h : ArithmeticFunction M) :
(f * g) • h = f • g • h := by
ext n
simp only [mul_apply, smul_apply, sum_smul, mul_smul, smul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l * j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i * k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp mul_assoc)
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_smul' ArithmeticFunction.mul_smul'
theorem one_smul' (b : ArithmeticFunction M) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) • b = b := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(1, x)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y1ne : y.fst ≠ 1 := by
intro con
simp only [Con, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, one_mul, Ne] at ymem
simp only [mem_singleton, Prod.ext_iff] at ynmem
-- Porting note: `tauto` worked from here.
cases y
subst con
simp only [true_and, one_mul, x0, not_false_eq_true, and_true] at ynmem ymem
tauto
simp [y1ne]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.one_smul' ArithmeticFunction.one_smul'
end Module
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ one := One.one
mul := Mul.mul
one_mul := one_smul'
mul_one := fun f => by
ext x
rw [mul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(x, 1)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y2ne : y.snd ≠ 1 := by
intro con
cases y; subst con -- Porting note: added
simp only [Con, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_one, Ne] at ymem
simp only [mem_singleton, Prod.ext_iff] at ynmem
tauto
simp [y2ne]
mul_assoc := mul_smul' }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.monoid ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid
instance instSemiring : Semiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: I reorganized this instance
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne,
ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.instAddCommMonoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by
ext
simp only [mul_apply, zero_mul, sum_const_zero, zero_apply]
mul_zero := fun f => by
ext
simp only [mul_apply, sum_const_zero, mul_zero, zero_apply]
left_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp only [← sum_add_distrib, mul_add, mul_apply, add_apply]
right_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp only [← sum_add_distrib, add_mul, mul_apply, add_apply] }
#align nat.arithmetic_function.semiring ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
ext
rw [mul_apply, ← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, sum_map]
simp [mul_comm] }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
add_left_neg := add_left_neg
mul_comm := mul_comm
zsmul := (· • ·) }
instance {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) where
one_smul := one_smul'
mul_smul := mul_smul'
smul_add r x y := by
ext
simp only [sum_add_distrib, smul_add, smul_apply, add_apply]
smul_zero r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply]
add_smul r s x := by
ext
simp only [add_smul, sum_add_distrib, smul_apply, add_apply]
zero_smul r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, zero_smul, zero_apply]
section Zeta
/-- `ζ 0 = 0`, otherwise `ζ x = 1`. The Dirichlet Series is the Riemann `ζ`. -/
def zeta : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun x => ite (x = 0) 0 1, rfl⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.zeta] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_apply {x : ℕ} : ζ x = if x = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.zeta_apply
theorem zeta_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0) : ζ x = 1 :=
if_neg h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_apply_ne ArithmeticFunction.zeta_apply_ne
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]`, LHS not in normal form
theorem coe_zeta_smul_apply {M} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
{f : ArithmeticFunction M} {x : ℕ} :
((↑ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) • f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [smul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.snd
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, one_smul]
· rw [← map_div_left_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_smul_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_smul_apply
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` to make the linter happy.
theorem coe_zeta_mul_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(↑ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_smul_apply
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_zeta_mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_zeta_mul_apply
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]` to make the linter happy.
theorem coe_mul_zeta_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [mul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.1
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (right_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, mul_one]
· rw [← map_div_right_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.coe_mul_zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.coe_mul_zeta_apply
theorem zeta_mul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_mul_apply
-- Porting note: was `by rw [← nat_coe_nat ζ, coe_zeta_mul_apply]`. Is this `theorem` obsolete?
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_mul_apply ArithmeticFunction.zeta_mul_apply
theorem mul_zeta_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_mul_zeta_apply
-- Porting note: was `by rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_mul_zeta_apply]`. Is this `theorem` obsolete=
#align nat.arithmetic_function.mul_zeta_apply ArithmeticFunction.mul_zeta_apply
end Zeta
open ArithmeticFunction
section Pmul
/-- This is the pointwise product of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pmul [MulZeroClass R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun x => f x * g x, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul ArithmeticFunction.pmul
@[simp]
theorem pmul_apply [MulZeroClass R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} : f.pmul g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_apply ArithmeticFunction.pmul_apply
theorem pmul_comm [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul g = g.pmul f := by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_comm ArithmeticFunction.pmul_comm
lemma pmul_assoc [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f₁ f₂ f₃ : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pmul (pmul f₁ f₂) f₃ = pmul f₁ (pmul f₂ f₃) := by
ext
simp only [pmul_apply, mul_assoc]
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
@[simp]
theorem pmul_zeta (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul ↑ζ = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pmul_zeta ArithmeticFunction.pmul_zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_pmul (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R).pmul f = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_pmul ArithmeticFunction.zeta_pmul
end NonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- This is the pointwise power of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def ppow (f : ArithmeticFunction R) (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
if h0 : k = 0 then ζ else ⟨fun x ↦ f x ^ k, by simp_rw [map_zero, zero_pow h0]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow ArithmeticFunction.ppow
@[simp]
theorem ppow_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f.ppow 0 = ζ := by rw [ppow, dif_pos rfl]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_zero ArithmeticFunction.ppow_zero
@[simp]
theorem ppow_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k x : ℕ} (kpos : 0 < k) : f.ppow k x = f x ^ k := by
rw [ppow, dif_neg (Nat.ne_of_gt kpos)]
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_apply ArithmeticFunction.ppow_apply
theorem ppow_succ' {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} : f.ppow (k + 1) = f.pmul (f.ppow k) := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ']
induction k <;> simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_succ ArithmeticFunction.ppow_succ'
theorem ppow_succ {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} {kpos : 0 < k} :
f.ppow (k + 1) = (f.ppow k).pmul f := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ]
induction k <;> simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.ppow_succ' ArithmeticFunction.ppow_succ
end Pmul
section Pdiv
/-- This is the pointwise division of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pdiv [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun n => f n / g n, by simp only [map_zero, ne_eq, not_true, div_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_apply [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (n : ℕ) :
pdiv f g n = f n / g n := rfl
/-- This result only holds for `DivisionSemiring`s instead of `GroupWithZero`s because zeta takes
values in ℕ, and hence the coercion requires an `AddMonoidWithOne`. TODO: Generalise zeta -/
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_zeta [DivisionSemiring R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pdiv f zeta = f := by
ext n
cases n <;> simp [succ_ne_zero]
end Pdiv
section ProdPrimeFactors
/-- The map $n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$ as an arithmetic function -/
def prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun d := if d = 0 then 0 else ∏ p ∈ d.primeFactors, f p
map_zero' := if_pos rfl
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` is custom notation for `prodPrimeFactors f n` -/
scoped syntax (name := bigproddvd) "∏ᵖ " extBinder " ∣ " term ", " term:67 : term
scoped macro_rules (kind := bigproddvd)
| `(∏ᵖ $x:ident ∣ $n, $r) => `(prodPrimeFactors (fun $x ↦ $r) $n)
@[simp]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f: ℕ → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p :=
if_neg hn
end ProdPrimeFactors
/-- Multiplicative functions -/
def IsMultiplicative [MonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : Prop :=
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative
namespace IsMultiplicative
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R]
@[simp, arith_mult]
theorem map_one {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h : f.IsMultiplicative) : f 1 = 1 :=
h.1
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_one ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_one
@[simp]
theorem map_mul_of_coprime {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m.Coprime n) : f (m * n) = f m * f n :=
hf.2 h
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime
end MonoidWithZero
theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (g : ι → ℕ) {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (s : Finset ι) (hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Coprime on g)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih hs
· simp [hf]
rw [coe_insert, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (Coprime.symmetric.comap g)] at hs
rw [prod_insert has, prod_insert has, hf.map_mul_of_coprime, ih hs.1]
exact .prod_right fun i hi => hs.2 _ hi (hi.ne_of_not_mem has).symm
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.map_prod ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.map_prod
theorem map_prod_of_prime [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : ∀ p ∈ t, p.Prime) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod _ h_mult t fun x hx y hy hxy => (coprime_primes (ht x hx) (ht y hy)).mpr hxy
theorem map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f) (l : ℕ)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : t ⊆ l.primeFactors) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod_of_prime h_mult t fun _ a => prime_of_mem_primeFactors (ht a)
@[arith_mult]
theorem natCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} [Semiring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: was `by simp [cop, h]`
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.nat_cast ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast := natCast
@[arith_mult]
theorem intCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} [Ring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
-- Porting note: was `by simp [cop, h]`
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.int_cast ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast := intCast
@[arith_mult]
theorem mul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f * g) := by
refine ⟨by simp [hf.1, hg.1], ?_⟩
simp only [mul_apply]
intro m n cop
rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product']
symm
apply sum_nbij fun ((i, j), k, l) ↦ (i * k, j * l)
· rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ h
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Ne]
constructor
· ring
rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero] at *
apply not_or_of_not ha hb
· simp only [Set.InjOn, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product, Prod.mk.inj_iff]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩ ⟨⟨c1, c2⟩, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ hcd h
simp only [Prod.mk.inj_iff] at h
ext <;> dsimp only
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one,
mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.2, mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.1, mul_comm c1 d1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_right, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one,
one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.2, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· simp only [Set.SurjOn, Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product,
Set.mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk.inj_iff]
rintro ⟨b1, b2⟩ h
dsimp at h
use ((b1.gcd m, b2.gcd m), (b1.gcd n, b2.gcd n))
rw [← cop.gcd_mul _, ← cop.gcd_mul _, ← h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop h.1,
Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop.symm _]
· rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp [h.2.1, h.2.2]
rw [mul_comm n m, h.1]
· simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
dsimp only
rw [hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_right_right,
hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_left_right]
ring
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.mul ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.mul
@[arith_mult]
theorem pmul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f.pmul g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pmul_apply, hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop, hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop]
ring⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.pmul ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.pmul
@[arith_mult]
theorem pdiv [CommGroupWithZero R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : IsMultiplicative f)
(hg : IsMultiplicative g) : IsMultiplicative (pdiv f g) :=
⟨ by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pdiv_apply, map_mul_of_coprime hf cop, map_mul_of_coprime hg cop,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv]
apply mul_mul_mul_comm ⟩
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` and any `n > 0`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
nonrec -- Porting note: added
theorem multiplicative_factorization [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) :=
multiplicative_factorization f (fun _ _ => hf.2) hf.1 hn
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.multiplicative_factorization ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.multiplicative_factorization
/-- A recapitulation of the definition of multiplicative that is simpler for proofs -/
theorem iff_ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} :
IsMultiplicative f ↔
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≠ 0 → n ≠ 0 → m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n := by
refine and_congr_right' (forall₂_congr fun m n => ⟨fun h _ _ => h, fun h hmn => ?_⟩)
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
exact h hm hn hmn
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.iff_ne_zero ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero
/-- Two multiplicative functions `f` and `g` are equal if and only if
they agree on prime powers -/
theorem eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (g : ArithmeticFunction R) (hg : g.IsMultiplicative) :
f = g ↔ ∀ p i : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → f (p ^ i) = g (p ^ i) := by
constructor
· intro h p i _
rw [h]
intro h
ext n
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero]
rw [multiplicative_factorization f hf hn, multiplicative_factorization g hg hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ h p _ (Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers
@[arith_mult]
theorem prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) :
IsMultiplicative (prodPrimeFactors f) := by
rw [iff_ne_zero]
simp only [ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, prodPrimeFactors_apply, primeFactors_one,
prod_empty, true_and]
intro x y hx hy hxy
have hxy₀ : x * y ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hx hy
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hxy₀, prodPrimeFactors_apply hx, prodPrimeFactors_apply hy,
Nat.primeFactors_mul hx hy, ← Finset.prod_union hxy.disjoint_primeFactors]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) (hg : IsMultiplicative g) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, (f + g) p = (f * g) n := by
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero]
simp_rw [add_apply (f:=f) (g:=g)]
rw [Finset.prod_add, mul_apply, sum_divisorsAntidiagonal (f · * g ·),
← divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree hn, sum_divisors_filter_squarefree hn.ne_zero,
factors_eq]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro t ht
rw [t.prod_val, Function.id_def,
← prod_primeFactors_sdiff_of_squarefree hn (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
hf.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n t (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
← hg.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n (_ \ t) Finset.sdiff_subset]
theorem lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} :
f (x.lcm y) * f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, f.map_zero, zero_mul, Nat.lcm_zero_left, Nat.gcd_zero_left]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp only [hy, f.map_zero, mul_zero, Nat.lcm_zero_right, Nat.gcd_zero_right, zero_mul]
have hgcd_ne_zero : x.gcd y ≠ 0 := gcd_ne_zero_left hx
have hlcm_ne_zero : x.lcm y ≠ 0 := lcm_ne_zero hx hy
have hfi_zero : ∀ {i}, f (i ^ 0) = 1 := by
intro i; rw [Nat.pow_zero, hf.1]
iterate 4 rw [hf.multiplicative_factorization f (by assumption),
Finsupp.prod_of_support_subset _ _ _ (fun _ _ => hfi_zero)
(s := (x.primeFactors ⊔ y.primeFactors))]
· rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro p _
rcases Nat.le_or_le (x.factorization p) (y.factorization p) with h | h <;>
simp only [factorization_lcm hx hy, ge_iff_le, Finsupp.sup_apply, h, sup_of_le_right,
sup_of_le_left, inf_of_le_right, Nat.factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.inf_apply,
inf_of_le_left, mul_comm]
· apply Finset.subset_union_right
· apply Finset.subset_union_left
· rw [factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.support_inf, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.inter_subset_union
· simp [factorization_lcm hx hy]
end IsMultiplicative
section SpecialFunctions
/-- The identity on `ℕ` as an `ArithmeticFunction`. -/
nonrec -- Porting note (#11445): added
def id : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨id, rfl⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.id ArithmeticFunction.id
@[simp]
theorem id_apply {x : ℕ} : id x = x :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.id_apply ArithmeticFunction.id_apply
/-- `pow k n = n ^ k`, except `pow 0 0 = 0`. -/
def pow (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
id.ppow k
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pow ArithmeticFunction.pow
@[simp]
theorem pow_apply {k n : ℕ} : pow k n = if k = 0 ∧ n = 0 then 0 else n ^ k := by
cases k
· simp [pow]
rename_i k -- Porting note: added
simp [pow, k.succ_pos.ne']
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pow_apply ArithmeticFunction.pow_apply
theorem pow_zero_eq_zeta : pow 0 = ζ := by
ext n
simp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.pow_zero_eq_zeta ArithmeticFunction.pow_zero_eq_zeta
/-- `σ k n` is the sum of the `k`th powers of the divisors of `n` -/
def sigma (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma ArithmeticFunction.sigma
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.sigma] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
theorem sigma_apply {k n : ℕ} : σ k n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_apply ArithmeticFunction.sigma_apply
theorem sigma_one_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 1 n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d := by simp [sigma_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_one_apply ArithmeticFunction.sigma_one_apply
theorem sigma_zero_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 0 n = (divisors n).card := by simp [sigma_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_zero_apply ArithmeticFunction.sigma_zero_apply
theorem sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : σ 0 (p ^ i) = i + 1 := by
rw [sigma_zero_apply, divisors_prime_pow hp, card_map, card_range]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow ArithmeticFunction.sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow
theorem zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma {k : ℕ} : ζ * pow k = σ k := by
ext
rw [sigma, zeta_mul_apply]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [pow_apply, if_neg (not_and_of_not_right _ _)]
contrapose! hx
simp [hx]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma ArithmeticFunction.zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_one [MonoidWithZero R] : IsMultiplicative (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2
⟨by simp, by
intro m n hm _hn hmn
rcases eq_or_ne m 1 with (rfl | hm')
· simp
rw [one_apply_ne, one_apply_ne hm', zero_mul]
rw [Ne, mul_eq_one, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl hm'⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_one ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_one
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_zeta : IsMultiplicative ζ :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2 ⟨by simp, by simp (config := { contextual := true })⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_zeta ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_zeta
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_id : IsMultiplicative ArithmeticFunction.id :=
⟨rfl, fun {_ _} _ => rfl⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_id ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_id
@[arith_mult]
theorem IsMultiplicative.ppow [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
{k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (f.ppow k) := by
induction' k with k hi
· exact isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
· rw [ppow_succ']
apply hf.pmul hi
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative.ppow ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.ppow
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_pow {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (pow k) :=
isMultiplicative_id.ppow
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_pow ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_pow
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_sigma {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (σ k) := by
rw [← zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma]
apply isMultiplicative_zeta.mul isMultiplicative_pow
#align nat.arithmetic_function.is_multiplicative_sigma ArithmeticFunction.isMultiplicative_sigma
/-- `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.factors.length, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Omega] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
theorem cardFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : Ω n = n.factors.length :=
rfl
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_apply ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_apply
lemma cardFactors_zero : Ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] theorem cardFactors_one : Ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardFactors_apply]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_one ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_one
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Ω n = 1 ↔ n.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => List.length_eq_one.2 ⟨n, factors_prime h⟩⟩
cases' n with n
· simp at h
rcases List.length_eq_one.1 h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← prod_factors n.add_one_ne_zero, hx, List.prod_singleton]
apply prime_of_mem_factors
rw [hx, List.mem_singleton]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_eq_one_iff_prime ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime
theorem cardFactors_mul {m n : ℕ} (m0 : m ≠ 0) (n0 : n ≠ 0) : Ω (m * n) = Ω m + Ω n := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, ← Multiset.coe_card, ← factors_eq,
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors_mul m0 n0, factors_eq, factors_eq,
Multiset.card_add, Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_card]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_mul ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_mul
theorem cardFactors_multiset_prod {s : Multiset ℕ} (h0 : s.prod ≠ 0) :
Ω s.prod = (Multiset.map Ω s).sum := by
induction s using Multiset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| cons ih => simp_all [cardFactors_mul, not_or]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_multiset_prod ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_multiset_prod
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω p = 1 :=
cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime.2 hp
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_apply_prime ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_apply_prime
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω (p ^ k) = k := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, hp.factors_pow, List.length_replicate]
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_factors_apply_prime_pow ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors_apply_prime_pow
/-- `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardDistinctFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.factors.dedup.length, by simp⟩
#align nat.arithmetic_function.card_distinct_factors ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.omega] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ArithmeticFunction.lean | 1,015 | 1,015 | theorem cardDistinctFactors_zero : ω 0 = 0 := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
#align_import data.num.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
/-
Porting note:
`bit0` and `bit1` are deprecated because it is mainly used to represent number literal in Lean3 but
not in Lean4 anymore. However, this file uses them for encoding numbers so this linter is
unnecessary.
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false
-- Porting note: Required for the notation `-[n+1]`.
open Int Function
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one PosNum.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one' PosNum.cast_one'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit0 PosNum.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit1 PosNum.cast_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => (Nat.cast_bit0 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit0 p.cast_to_nat
| bit1 p => (Nat.cast_bit1 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit1 p.cast_to_nat
#align pos_num.cast_to_nat PosNum.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align pos_num.to_nat_to_int PosNum.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_to_int PosNum.cast_to_int
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit0 (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.succ_to_nat PosNum.succ_to_nat
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.one_add PosNum.one_add
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.add_one PosNum.add_one
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg _root_.bit0 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.add_to_nat PosNum.add_to_nat
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
#align pos_num.add_succ PosNum.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, _root_.bit0 n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (_root_.bit0 p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
#align pos_num.bit0_of_bit0 PosNum.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : _root_.bit1 n = bit1 n :=
show _root_.bit0 n + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
#align pos_num.bit1_of_bit1 PosNum.bit1_of_bit1
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
#align pos_num.mul_to_nat PosNum.mul_to_nat
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
#align pos_num.to_nat_pos PosNum.to_nat_pos
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat_lemma PosNum.cmp_to_nat_lemma
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> cases' n with n n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.cmp_swap PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat PosNum.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align pos_num.lt_to_nat PosNum.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align pos_num.le_to_nat PosNum.le_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.add_zero Num.add_zero
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zero_add Num.zero_add
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
#align num.add_one Num.add_one
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos p, pos q => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
#align num.add_succ Num.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
#align num.bit0_of_bit0 Num.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
#align num.bit1_of_bit1 Num.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
#align num.of_nat'_zero Num.ofNat'_zero
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq rfl _ _
#align num.of_nat'_bit Num.ofNat'_bit
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
#align num.of_nat'_one Num.ofNat'_one
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.bit1_succ Num.bit1_succ
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond, _root_.bit1]
-- Porting note: `cc` was not ported yet so `exact Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1` is used.
· erw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by
simpa [Nat.bit, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] using Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1,
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
#align num.of_nat'_succ Num.ofNat'_succ
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
#align num.add_of_nat' Num.add_ofNat'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero Num.cast_zero
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero' Num.cast_zero'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_one Num.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
#align num.cast_pos Num.cast_pos
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
#align num.succ'_to_nat Num.succ'_to_nat
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
#align num.succ_to_nat Num.succ_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
#align num.cast_to_nat Num.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
#align num.add_to_nat Num.add_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
#align num.mul_to_nat Num.mul_to_nat
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos b => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
#align num.cmp_to_nat Num.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align num.lt_to_nat Num.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align num.le_to_nat Num.le_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit false, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
| bit1 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
#align pos_num.of_to_nat' PosNum.of_to_nat'
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat' Num.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) := LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
#align num.to_nat_inj Num.to_nat_inj
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
#align num.add_monoid Num.addMonoid
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
#align num.add_monoid_with_one Num.addMonoidWithOne
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
#align num.comm_semiring Num.commSemiring
instance orderedCancelAddCommMonoid : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Num where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
#align num.ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid
instance linearOrderedSemiring : LinearOrderedSemiring Num :=
{ Num.commSemiring,
Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid with
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
decidableLT := Num.decidableLT
decidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
decidableEq := instDecidableEqNum
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
#align num.linear_ordered_semiring Num.linearOrderedSemiring
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
#align num.add_of_nat Num.add_of_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align num.to_nat_to_int Num.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_to_int Num.cast_to_int
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
#align num.to_of_nat Num.to_of_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
#align num.of_nat_cast Num.of_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias of_nat_cast := of_natCast
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
#align num.of_nat_inj Num.of_nat_inj
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat Num.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
#align num.dvd_to_nat Num.dvd_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
#align pos_num.of_to_nat PosNum.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
#align pos_num.to_nat_inj PosNum.to_nat_inj
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (_root_.bit0 n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 n => rfl
#align pos_num.pred'_to_nat PosNum.pred'_to_nat
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
#align pos_num.pred'_succ' PosNum.pred'_succ'
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
#align pos_num.succ'_pred' PosNum.succ'_pred'
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
#align pos_num.has_dvd PosNum.dvd
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
#align pos_num.dvd_to_nat PosNum.dvd_to_nat
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, Nat.size_bit0 <| ne_of_gt <| to_nat_pos n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, Nat.size_bit1]
#align pos_num.size_to_nat PosNum.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
#align pos_num.size_eq_nat_size PosNum.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
#align pos_num.nat_size_to_nat PosNum.natSize_to_nat
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
#align pos_num.nat_size_pos PosNum.natSize_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.add_comm_semigroup PosNum.addCommSemigroup
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.comm_monoid PosNum.commMonoid
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
#align pos_num.distrib PosNum.distrib
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
decidableLT := by infer_instance
decidableLE := by infer_instance
decidableEq := by infer_instance
#align pos_num.linear_order PosNum.linearOrder
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
#align pos_num.cast_to_num PosNum.cast_to_num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> rfl
#align pos_num.bit_to_nat PosNum.bit_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_add PosNum.cast_add
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
#align pos_num.cast_succ PosNum.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
#align pos_num.cast_inj PosNum.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : (1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
#align pos_num.one_le_cast PosNum.one_le_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
#align pos_num.cast_pos PosNum.cast_pos
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_mul PosNum.cast_mul
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
#align pos_num.cmp_eq PosNum.cmp_eq
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_lt PosNum.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align pos_num.cast_le PosNum.cast_le
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align num.bit_to_nat Num.bit_to_nat
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_succ' Num.cast_succ'
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
#align num.cast_succ Num.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_add Num.cast_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [Semiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, _root_.bit0, cast_add]; rfl
#align num.cast_bit0 Num.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [Semiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 (n : α) := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, _root_.bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
#align num.cast_bit1 Num.cast_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [Semiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
#align num.cast_mul Num.cast_mul
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
#align num.size_to_nat Num.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
#align num.size_eq_nat_size Num.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
#align num.nat_size_to_nat Num.natSize_to_nat
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by
rw [ofNat'] at IH ⊢
rw [Nat.binaryRec_eq, IH]
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_bit0` & `Nat.cast_bit1` are not `simp` theorems anymore.
· cases b <;> simp [Nat.bit, bit0_of_bit0, bit1_of_bit1, Nat.cast_bit0, Nat.cast_bit1]
· rfl
#align num.of_nat'_eq Num.ofNat'_eq
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zneg_to_znum Num.zneg_toZNum
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zneg_to_znum_neg Num.zneg_toZNumNeg
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
#align num.to_znum_inj Num.toZNum_inj
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align num.cast_to_znum Num.cast_toZNum
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [AddGroup α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align num.cast_to_znum_neg Num.cast_toZNumNeg
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align num.add_to_znum Num.add_toZNum
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
#align pos_num.pred_to_nat PosNum.pred_to_nat
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
#align pos_num.sub'_one PosNum.sub'_one
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
#align pos_num.one_sub' PosNum.one_sub'
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
#align pos_num.lt_iff_cmp PosNum.lt_iff_cmp
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
#align pos_num.le_iff_cmp PosNum.le_iff_cmp
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
#align num.pred_to_nat Num.pred_to_nat
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
#align num.ppred_to_nat Num.ppred_to_nat
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
#align num.cmp_swap Num.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
#align num.cmp_eq Num.cmp_eq
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
#align num.cast_lt Num.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align num.cast_le Num.cast_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
#align num.cast_inj Num.cast_inj
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
#align num.lt_iff_cmp Num.lt_iff_cmp
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
#align num.le_iff_cmp Num.le_iff_cmp
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
cases' m with m <;> cases' n with n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have : ∀ (b) (n : PosNum), (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
intros b _; cases b <;> rfl
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> cases' n with n n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat
rw [show ∀ b n, (pos (PosNum.bit b n) : ℕ) = Nat.bit b ↑n by
intros b _; cases b <;> rfl]
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
#align num.bitwise_to_nat Num.castNum_eq_bitwise
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
-- Porting note: A name of an implicit local hypothesis is not available so
-- `cases_type*` is used.
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.lor_to_nat Num.castNum_or
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.land_to_nat Num.castNum_and
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.ldiff_to_nat Num.castNum_ldiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.lxor_to_nat Num.castNum_ldiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH,
Nat.bit0_val, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
#align num.shiftl_to_nat Num.castNum_shiftLeft
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
cases' m with m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr];
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
cases' m with m m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (_root_.bit1 m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (_root_.bit0 m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val]
#align num.shiftr_to_nat Num.castNum_shiftRight
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
-- Porting note: `unfold` → `dsimp only`
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> cases' m with m m
<;> dsimp only [PosNum.testBit, Nat.zero_eq]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
#align num.test_bit_to_nat Num.castNum_testBit
end Num
namespace ZNum
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ((0 : ZNum) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_zero ZNum.cast_zero
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : (ZNum.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_zero' ZNum.cast_zero'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ((1 : ZNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_one ZNum.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] (n : PosNum) : (pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_pos ZNum.cast_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] (n : PosNum) : (neg n : α) = -n :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_neg ZNum.cast_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zneg [AddGroup α] [One α] : ∀ n, ((-n : ZNum) : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| pos _p => rfl
| neg _p => (neg_neg _).symm
#align znum.cast_zneg ZNum.cast_zneg
theorem neg_zero : (-0 : ZNum) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.neg_zero ZNum.neg_zero
theorem zneg_pos (n : PosNum) : -pos n = neg n :=
rfl
#align znum.zneg_pos ZNum.zneg_pos
theorem zneg_neg (n : PosNum) : -neg n = pos n :=
rfl
#align znum.zneg_neg ZNum.zneg_neg
theorem zneg_zneg (n : ZNum) : - -n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_zneg ZNum.zneg_zneg
theorem zneg_bit1 (n : ZNum) : -n.bit1 = (-n).bitm1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_bit1 ZNum.zneg_bit1
theorem zneg_bitm1 (n : ZNum) : -n.bitm1 = (-n).bit1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_bitm1 ZNum.zneg_bitm1
theorem zneg_succ (n : ZNum) : -n.succ = (-n).pred := by
cases n <;> try { rfl }; rw [succ, Num.zneg_toZNumNeg]; rfl
#align znum.zneg_succ ZNum.zneg_succ
theorem zneg_pred (n : ZNum) : -n.pred = (-n).succ := by
rw [← zneg_zneg (succ (-n)), zneg_succ, zneg_zneg]
#align znum.zneg_pred ZNum.zneg_pred
@[simp]
theorem abs_to_nat : ∀ n, (abs n : ℕ) = Int.natAbs n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg Int.natAbs p.to_nat_to_int
| neg p => show Int.natAbs ((p : ℕ) : ℤ) = Int.natAbs (-p) by rw [p.to_nat_to_int, Int.natAbs_neg]
#align znum.abs_to_nat ZNum.abs_to_nat
@[simp]
theorem abs_toZNum : ∀ n : Num, abs n.toZNum = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align znum.abs_to_znum ZNum.abs_toZNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, ((n : ℤ) : α) = n
| 0 => by rw [cast_zero, cast_zero, Int.cast_zero]
| pos p => by rw [cast_pos, cast_pos, PosNum.cast_to_int]
| neg p => by rw [cast_neg, cast_neg, Int.cast_neg, PosNum.cast_to_int]
#align znum.cast_to_int ZNum.cast_to_int
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : ZNum, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos a => congr_arg pos a.bit0_of_bit0
| neg a => congr_arg neg a.bit0_of_bit0
#align znum.bit0_of_bit0 ZNum.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : ZNum, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos a => congr_arg pos a.bit1_of_bit1
| neg a => show PosNum.sub' 1 (_root_.bit0 a) = _ by rw [PosNum.one_sub', a.bit0_of_bit0]; rfl
#align znum.bit1_of_bit1 ZNum.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, (n.bit0 : α) = bit0 (n : α)
| 0 => (add_zero _).symm
| pos p => by rw [ZNum.bit0, cast_pos, cast_pos]; rfl
| neg p => by
rw [ZNum.bit0, cast_neg, cast_neg, PosNum.cast_bit0, _root_.bit0, _root_.bit0, neg_add_rev]
#align znum.cast_bit0 ZNum.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, (n.bit1 : α) = bit1 (n : α)
| 0 => by simp [ZNum.bit1, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0]
| pos p => by rw [ZNum.bit1, cast_pos, cast_pos]; rfl
| neg p => by
rw [ZNum.bit1, cast_neg, cast_neg]
cases' e : pred' p with a <;>
have ep : p = _ := (succ'_pred' p).symm.trans (congr_arg Num.succ' e)
· conv at ep => change p = 1
subst p
simp [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0]
-- Porting note: `rw [Num.succ']` yields a `match` pattern.
· dsimp only [Num.succ'] at ep
subst p
have : (↑(-↑a : ℤ) : α) = -1 + ↑(-↑a + 1 : ℤ) := by simp [add_comm (- ↑a : ℤ) 1]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] using this
#align znum.cast_bit1 ZNum.cast_bit1
@[simp]
theorem cast_bitm1 [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : ZNum) : (n.bitm1 : α) = bit0 (n : α) - 1 := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← zneg_zneg n]
rw [← zneg_bit1, cast_zneg, cast_bit1]
have : ((-1 + n + n : ℤ) : α) = (n + n + -1 : ℤ) := by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
#align znum.cast_bitm1 ZNum.cast_bitm1
theorem add_zero (n : ZNum) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.add_zero ZNum.add_zero
theorem zero_add (n : ZNum) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zero_add ZNum.zero_add
theorem add_one : ∀ n : ZNum, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.add_one
| neg p => by cases p <;> rfl
#align znum.add_one ZNum.add_one
end ZNum
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
theorem cast_to_znum : ∀ n : PosNum, (n : ZNum) = ZNum.pos n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => (ZNum.bit0_of_bit0 p).trans <| congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
| bit1 p => (ZNum.bit1_of_bit1 p).trans <| congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
#align pos_num.cast_to_znum PosNum.cast_to_znum
theorem cast_sub' [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ m n : PosNum, (sub' m n : α) = m - n
| a, 1 => by
rw [sub'_one, Num.cast_toZNum, ← Num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, ← Nat.sub_one]
simp [PosNum.cast_pos]
| 1, b => by
rw [one_sub', Num.cast_toZNumNeg, ← neg_sub, neg_inj, ← Num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat,
← Nat.sub_one]
simp [PosNum.cast_pos]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit0, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((a + -b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + a + (-b + -b) := by simp [add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bitm1, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + -1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + -1 + (-b + -b) : ℤ) := by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit1, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + 1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + 1 + (-b + -b) : ℤ) := by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit0, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + (-b + -b) := by simp [add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
#align pos_num.cast_sub' PosNum.cast_sub'
theorem to_nat_eq_succ_pred (n : PosNum) : (n : ℕ) = n.pred' + 1 := by
rw [← Num.succ'_to_nat, n.succ'_pred']
#align pos_num.to_nat_eq_succ_pred PosNum.to_nat_eq_succ_pred
theorem to_int_eq_succ_pred (n : PosNum) : (n : ℤ) = (n.pred' : ℕ) + 1 := by
rw [← n.to_nat_to_int, to_nat_eq_succ_pred]; rfl
#align pos_num.to_int_eq_succ_pred PosNum.to_int_eq_succ_pred
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ m n : Num, (sub' m n : α) = m - n
| 0, 0 => (sub_zero _).symm
| pos _a, 0 => (sub_zero _).symm
| 0, pos _b => (zero_sub _).symm
| pos _a, pos _b => PosNum.cast_sub' _ _
#align num.cast_sub' Num.cast_sub'
theorem toZNum_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.succ.toZNum = n.toZNum.succ
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.to_znum_succ Num.toZNum_succ
theorem toZNumNeg_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.succ.toZNumNeg = n.toZNumNeg.pred
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.to_znum_neg_succ Num.toZNumNeg_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ : ∀ n : ZNum, n.pred.succ = n
| 0 => rfl
| ZNum.neg p => show toZNumNeg (pos p).succ'.pred' = _ by rw [PosNum.pred'_succ']; rfl
| ZNum.pos p => by rw [ZNum.pred, ← toZNum_succ, Num.succ, PosNum.succ'_pred', toZNum]
#align num.pred_succ Num.pred_succ
-- Porting note: `erw [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']` yields `match` so
-- `change` & `dsimp` are required.
theorem succ_ofInt' : ∀ n, ZNum.ofInt' (n + 1) = ZNum.ofInt' n + 1
| (n : ℕ) => by
change ZNum.ofInt' (n + 1 : ℕ) = ZNum.ofInt' (n : ℕ) + 1
dsimp only [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']
rw [Num.ofNat'_succ, Num.add_one, toZNum_succ, ZNum.add_one]
| -[0+1] => by
change ZNum.ofInt' 0 = ZNum.ofInt' (-[0+1]) + 1
dsimp only [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']
rw [ofNat'_succ, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| -[(n + 1)+1] => by
change ZNum.ofInt' -[n+1] = ZNum.ofInt' -[(n + 1)+1] + 1
dsimp only [ZNum.ofInt', ZNum.ofInt']
rw [@Num.ofNat'_succ (n + 1), Num.add_one, toZNumNeg_succ,
@ofNat'_succ n, Num.add_one, ZNum.add_one, pred_succ]
#align num.succ_of_int' Num.succ_ofInt'
theorem ofInt'_toZNum : ∀ n : ℕ, toZNum n = ZNum.ofInt' n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, toZNum_succ, ofInt'_toZNum n, Nat.cast_succ, succ_ofInt',
ZNum.add_one]
#align num.of_int'_to_znum Num.ofInt'_toZNum
theorem mem_ofZNum' : ∀ {m : Num} {n : ZNum}, m ∈ ofZNum' n ↔ n = toZNum m
| 0, 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
| pos m, 0 => ⟨nofun, nofun⟩
| m, ZNum.pos p =>
Option.some_inj.trans <| by cases m <;> constructor <;> intro h <;> try cases h <;> rfl
| m, ZNum.neg p => ⟨nofun, fun h => by cases m <;> cases h⟩
#align num.mem_of_znum' Num.mem_ofZNum'
theorem ofZNum'_toNat : ∀ n : ZNum, (↑) <$> ofZNum' n = Int.toNat' n
| 0 => rfl
| ZNum.pos p => show _ = Int.toNat' p by rw [← PosNum.to_nat_to_int p]; rfl
| ZNum.neg p =>
(congr_arg fun x => Int.toNat' (-x)) <|
show ((p.pred' + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = p by rw [← succ'_to_nat]; simp
#align num.of_znum'_to_nat Num.ofZNum'_toNat
@[simp]
theorem ofZNum_toNat : ∀ n : ZNum, (ofZNum n : ℕ) = Int.toNat n
| 0 => rfl
| ZNum.pos p => show _ = Int.toNat p by rw [← PosNum.to_nat_to_int p]; rfl
| ZNum.neg p =>
(congr_arg fun x => Int.toNat (-x)) <|
show ((p.pred' + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = p by rw [← succ'_to_nat]; simp
#align num.of_znum_to_nat Num.ofZNum_toNat
@[simp]
theorem cast_ofZNum [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : ZNum) : (ofZNum n : α) = Int.toNat n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ofZNum_toNat]
#align num.cast_of_znum Num.cast_ofZNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem sub_to_nat (m n) : ((m - n : Num) : ℕ) = m - n :=
show (ofZNum _ : ℕ) = _ by
rw [ofZNum_toNat, cast_sub', ← to_nat_to_int, ← to_nat_to_int, Int.toNat_sub]
#align num.sub_to_nat Num.sub_to_nat
end Num
namespace ZNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ m n, ((m + n : ZNum) : α) = m + n
| 0, a => by cases a <;> exact (_root_.zero_add _).symm
| b, 0 => by cases b <;> exact (_root_.add_zero _).symm
| pos a, pos b => PosNum.cast_add _ _
| pos a, neg b => by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using PosNum.cast_sub' (α := α) _ _
| neg a, pos b =>
have : (↑b + -↑a : α) = -↑a + ↑b := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_int a, ← PosNum.cast_to_int b, ← Int.cast_neg, ← Int.cast_add (-a)]
simp [add_comm]
(PosNum.cast_sub' _ _).trans <| (sub_eq_add_neg _ _).trans this
| neg a, neg b =>
show -(↑(a + b) : α) = -a + -b by
rw [PosNum.cast_add, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, neg_neg,
← PosNum.cast_to_int a, ← PosNum.cast_to_int b, ← Int.cast_add, ← Int.cast_add, add_comm]
#align znum.cast_add ZNum.cast_add
@[simp]
theorem cast_succ [AddGroupWithOne α] (n) : ((succ n : ZNum) : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
#align znum.cast_succ ZNum.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_int : ∀ m n, ((m * n : ZNum) : ℤ) = m * n
| 0, a => by cases a <;> exact (zero_mul _).symm
| b, 0 => by cases b <;> exact (mul_zero _).symm
| pos a, pos b => PosNum.cast_mul a b
| pos a, neg b => show -↑(a * b) = ↑a * -↑b by rw [PosNum.cast_mul, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg]
| neg a, pos b => show -↑(a * b) = -↑a * ↑b by rw [PosNum.cast_mul, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
| neg a, neg b => show ↑(a * b) = -↑a * -↑b by rw [PosNum.cast_mul, neg_mul_neg]
#align znum.mul_to_int ZNum.mul_to_int
theorem cast_mul [Ring α] (m n) : ((m * n : ZNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_int, mul_to_int, Int.cast_mul, cast_to_int, cast_to_int]
#align znum.cast_mul ZNum.cast_mul
theorem ofInt'_neg : ∀ n : ℤ, ofInt' (-n) = -ofInt' n
| -[n+1] => show ofInt' (n + 1 : ℕ) = _ by simp only [ofInt', Num.zneg_toZNumNeg]
| 0 => show Num.toZNum (Num.ofNat' 0) = -Num.toZNum (Num.ofNat' 0) by rw [Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => show Num.toZNumNeg _ = -Num.toZNum _ by rw [Num.zneg_toZNum]
#align znum.of_int'_neg ZNum.ofInt'_neg
-- Porting note: `erw [ofInt']` yields `match` so `dsimp` is required.
theorem of_to_int' : ∀ n : ZNum, ZNum.ofInt' n = n
| 0 => by dsimp [ofInt', cast_zero]; erw [Num.ofNat'_zero, Num.toZNum]
| pos a => by rw [cast_pos, ← PosNum.cast_to_nat, ← Num.ofInt'_toZNum, PosNum.of_to_nat]; rfl
| neg a => by
rw [cast_neg, ofInt'_neg, ← PosNum.cast_to_nat, ← Num.ofInt'_toZNum, PosNum.of_to_nat]; rfl
#align znum.of_to_int' ZNum.of_to_int'
theorem to_int_inj {m n : ZNum} : (m : ℤ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_int' h, congr_arg _⟩
#align znum.to_int_inj ZNum.to_int_inj
theorem cmp_to_int : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℤ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℤ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]
cases PosNum.cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> [simp; exact congr_arg pos; simp [GT.gt]]
| neg a, neg b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat b a; revert this; dsimp [cmp]
cases PosNum.cmp b a <;> dsimp <;> [simp; simp (config := { contextual := true }); simp [GT.gt]]
| pos a, 0 => PosNum.cast_pos _
| pos a, neg b => lt_trans (neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _) (PosNum.cast_pos _)
| 0, neg b => neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _
| neg a, 0 => neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _
| neg a, pos b => lt_trans (neg_lt_zero.2 <| PosNum.cast_pos _) (PosNum.cast_pos _)
| 0, pos b => PosNum.cast_pos _
#align znum.cmp_to_int ZNum.cmp_to_int
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_int {m n : ZNum} : (m : ℤ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℤ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_int m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align znum.lt_to_int ZNum.lt_to_int
theorem le_to_int {m n : ZNum} : (m : ℤ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_int
#align znum.le_to_int ZNum.le_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedRing α] {m n : ZNum} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_int m, ← cast_to_int n, Int.cast_lt, lt_to_int]
#align znum.cast_lt ZNum.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,385 | 1,386 | theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedRing α] {m n : ZNum} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by |
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLinearEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Bilinear
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.sesquilinear_form from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84582d2872fb47c0c17eec7382dc097c9ec7137a"
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This file defines the conversion between sesquilinear forms and matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂` given a basis define a bilinear form
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'` define the bilinear form on `n → R`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂'`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form on `n → R`
## Todos
At the moment this is quite a literal port from `Matrix.BilinearForm`. Everything should be
generalized to fully semibilinear forms.
## Tags
sesquilinear_form, matrix, basis
-/
variable {R R₁ R₂ M M₁ M₂ M₁' M₂' n m n' m' ι : Type*}
open Finset LinearMap Matrix
open Matrix
section AuxToLinearMap
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable (σ₁ : R₁ →+* R) (σ₂ : R₂ →+* R)
/-- The map from `Matrix n n R` to bilinear forms on `n → R`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'`. -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m R) : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R :=
-- Porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
mk₂'ₛₗ σ₁ σ₂ (fun (v : n → R₁) (w : m → R₂) => ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₁ (v i) * f i j * σ₂ (w j))
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, add_mul, sum_add_distrib])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_sum])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, mul_add, sum_add_distrib]) fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_sum]
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_aux Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis (f : Matrix n m R) (i : n) (j : m) :
f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ (LinearMap.stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(LinearMap.stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) = f i j := by
rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux, mk₂'ₛₗ_apply]
have : (∑ i', ∑ j', (if i = i' then 1 else 0) * f i' j' * if j = j' then 1 else 0) = f i j := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, ← Finset.mul_sum]
simp only [boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, if_true, mul_comm (f _ _)]
rw [← this]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by simp
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_aux_std_basis Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis
end AuxToLinearMap
section AuxToMatrix
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* R} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* R}
/-- The linear map from sesquilinear forms to `Matrix n m R` given an `n`-indexed basis for `M₁`
and an `m`-indexed basis for `M₂`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂) :
(M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) →ₗ[R] Matrix n m R where
toFun f := of fun i j => f (b₁ i) (b₂ j)
map_add' _f _g := rfl
map_smul' _f _g := rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂_aux LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply (f : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂)
(i : n) (j : m) : LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux b₁ b₂ f i j = f (b₁ i) (b₂ j) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂_aux_apply LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* R} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* R}
theorem LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux (f : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (fun i => stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(fun j => stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) f) =
f := by
refine ext_basis (Pi.basisFun R₁ n) (Pi.basisFun R₂ m) fun i j => ?_
simp_rw [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis, LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply]
#align linear_map.to_linear_map₂'_aux_to_matrix₂_aux LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux
theorem Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (fun i => LinearMap.stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(fun j => LinearMap.stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) (f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂) =
f := by
ext i j
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis]
#align matrix.to_matrix₂_aux_to_linear_map₂'_aux Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux
end CommRing
end AuxToMatrix
section ToMatrix'
/-! ### Bilinear forms over `n → R`
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and sesquilinear forms on `n → R`.
-/
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* R} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* R}
/-- The linear equivalence between sesquilinear forms and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' : ((n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R :=
{
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (fun i => stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1) fun j =>
stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j
1 with
toFun := LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux _ _
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
left_inv := LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux
right_inv := Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux }
#align linear_map.to_matrixₛₗ₂' LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'
/-- The linear equivalence between bilinear forms and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂' LinearMap.toMatrix₂'
variable (σ₁ σ₂)
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and sesquilinear forms on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.symm
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂' Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and bilinear forms on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂' : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂'.symm
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂' Matrix.toLinearMap₂'
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq (M : Matrix n m R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ M = Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m R) (x : n → R₁) (y : m → R₂) :
-- Porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₁ (x i) * M i j * σ₂ (y j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_apply Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_apply
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m R) (x : n → R) (y : m → R) :
-- Porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, x i * M i j * y j :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_apply Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply' (M : Matrix n m R) (v : n → R) (w : m → R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M v w = Matrix.dotProduct v (M *ᵥ w) := by
simp_rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply, Matrix.dotProduct, Matrix.mulVec, Matrix.dotProduct]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [← mul_assoc]
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_apply' Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_stdBasis (M : Matrix n m R) (i : n) (j : m) :
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M (LinearMap.stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(LinearMap.stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis σ₁ σ₂ M i j
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_std_basis Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_stdBasis
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_stdBasis (M : Matrix n m R) (i : n) (j : m) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M (LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ => R) i 1)
(LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ => R) j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis _ _ M i j
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_std_basis Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_stdBasis
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.symm : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] _) = Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrixₛₗ₂'_symm LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_symm :
((Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂).symm : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R) = LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.symm_symm
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_symm Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_toMatrix' (B : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) :
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ (LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' B) = B :=
(Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂).apply_symm_apply B
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_to_matrix' Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_toMatrix'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_toMatrix' (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' (LinearMap.toMatrix₂' B) = B :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'.apply_symm_apply B
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_to_matrix' Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_toMatrix'
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMapₛₗ₂' (M : Matrix n m R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' (Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.apply_symm_apply M
#align linear_map.to_matrix'_to_linear_mapₛₗ₂' LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMapₛₗ₂'
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMap₂' (M : Matrix n m R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' (Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.apply_symm_apply M
#align linear_map.to_matrix'_to_linear_map₂' LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMap₂'
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_apply (B : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' B i j =
B (stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1) (stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrixₛₗ₂'_apply LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_apply
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' B i j = B (stdBasis R (fun _ => R) i 1) (stdBasis R (fun _ => R) j 1) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_apply LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply
variable [Fintype n'] [Fintype m']
variable [DecidableEq n'] [DecidableEq m']
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₁₂ (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (l : (n' → R) →ₗ[R] n → R)
(r : (m' → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
toMatrix₂' (B.compl₁₂ l r) = (toMatrix' l)ᵀ * toMatrix₂' B * toMatrix' r := by
ext i j
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply, LinearMap.compl₁₂_apply, transpose_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
LinearMap.toMatrix', LinearEquiv.coe_mk, sum_mul]
rw [sum_comm]
conv_lhs => rw [← LinearMap.sum_repr_mul_repr_mul (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) (l _) (r _)]
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i' -
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro j' -
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.basisFun_repr, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm,
Pi.basisFun_apply, of_apply]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, smul_zero]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, Finsupp.sum_zero]
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_compl₁₂ LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₁₂
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_comp (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (f : (n' → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
toMatrix₂' (B.comp f) = (toMatrix' f)ᵀ * toMatrix₂' B := by
rw [← LinearMap.compl₂_id (B.comp f), ← LinearMap.compl₁₂]
simp
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_comp LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_comp
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₂ (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (f : (m' → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
toMatrix₂' (B.compl₂ f) = toMatrix₂' B * toMatrix' f := by
rw [← LinearMap.comp_id B, ← LinearMap.compl₁₂]
simp
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_compl₂ LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₂
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂'_mul (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R)
(N : Matrix m m' R) : M * toMatrix₂' B * N = toMatrix₂' (B.compl₁₂ (toLin' Mᵀ) (toLin' N)) := by
simp
#align linear_map.mul_to_matrix₂'_mul LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂'_mul
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix' (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R) :
M * toMatrix₂' B = toMatrix₂' (B.comp <| toLin' Mᵀ) := by
simp only [B.toMatrix₂'_comp, transpose_transpose, toMatrix'_toLin']
#align linear_map.mul_to_matrix' LinearMap.mul_toMatrix'
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_mul (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix m m' R) :
toMatrix₂' B * M = toMatrix₂' (B.compl₂ <| toLin' M) := by
simp only [B.toMatrix₂'_compl₂, toMatrix'_toLin']
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_mul LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_mul
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_comp (M : Matrix n m R) (P : Matrix n n' R) (Q : Matrix m m' R) :
M.toLinearMap₂'.compl₁₂ (toLin' P) (toLin' Q) = toLinearMap₂' (Pᵀ * M * Q) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂'.injective (by simp)
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_comp Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_comp
end ToMatrix'
section ToMatrix
/-! ### Bilinear forms over arbitrary vector spaces
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and bilinear forms on
a module with a fixed basis.
-/
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
variable [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable (b₁ : Basis n R M₁) (b₂ : Basis m R M₂)
/-- `LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear forms on `M` and
`n`-by-`m` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b₁` and `b₂` are `R`-bases for `M₁` and `M₂`,
respectively. -/
noncomputable def LinearMap.toMatrix₂ : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R :=
(b₁.equivFun.arrowCongr (b₂.equivFun.arrowCongr (LinearEquiv.refl R R))).trans
LinearMap.toMatrix₂'
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂ LinearMap.toMatrix₂
/-- `Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear forms on `M` and
`n`-by-`m` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b₁` and `b₂` are `R`-bases for `M₁` and `M₂`,
respectively; this is the reverse direction of `LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂`. -/
noncomputable def Matrix.toLinearMap₂ : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).symm
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂ Matrix.toLinearMap₂
-- We make this and not `LinearMap.toMatrix₂` a `simp` lemma to avoid timeouts
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B i j = B (b₁ i) (b₂ j) := by
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix₂, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply,
LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply,
Basis.equivFun_symm_stdBasis, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂_apply LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_apply (M : Matrix n m R) (x : M₁) (y : M₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂ M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, b₁.repr x i * M i j * b₂.repr y j :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂_apply Matrix.toLinearMap₂_apply
-- Not a `simp` lemma since `LinearMap.toMatrix₂` needs an extra argument
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_eq (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux b₁ b₂ B = LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B :=
Matrix.ext fun i j => by rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply]
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂_aux_eq LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_eq
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_symm : (LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).symm = Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂ :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂_symm LinearMap.toMatrix₂_symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_symm : (Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂).symm = LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).symm_symm
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂_symm Matrix.toLinearMap₂_symm
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SesquilinearForm.lean | 387 | 391 | theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_basisFun :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂ (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) = Matrix.toLinearMap₂' := by |
ext M
simp only [Matrix.toLinearMap₂_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply, Pi.basisFun_repr, coe_comp,
Function.comp_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convolution
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.EulerSineProd
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.BohrMollerup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gamma.beta from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3209ddf94136d36e5e5c624b10b2a347cc9d090"
/-!
# The Beta function, and further properties of the Gamma function
In this file we define the Beta integral, relate Beta and Gamma functions, and prove some
refined properties of the Gamma function using these relations.
## Results on the Beta function
* `Complex.betaIntegral`: the Beta function `Β(u, v)`, where `u`, `v` are complex with positive
real part.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`: the formula
`Gamma u * Gamma v = Gamma (u + v) * betaIntegral u v`.
## Results on the Gamma function
* `Complex.Gamma_ne_zero`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}` we have `Γ s ≠ 0`.
* `Complex.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`: for all `s`, the limit as `n → ∞` of the sequence
`n ↦ n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))` is `Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`: Euler's reflection formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (1 - s) = π / sin π s`.
* `Complex.differentiable_one_div_Gamma`: the function `1 / Γ(s)` is differentiable everywhere.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: Legendre's duplication formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (s + 1 / 2) = Gamma (2 * s) * 2 ^ (1 - 2 * s) * √π`.
* `Real.Gamma_ne_zero`, `Real.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`,
`Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`, `Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: real versions of the above.
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat Topology Real
section BetaIntegral
/-! ## The Beta function -/
namespace Complex
/-- The Beta function `Β (u, v)`, defined as `∫ x:ℝ in 0..1, x ^ (u - 1) * (1 - x) ^ (v - 1)`. -/
noncomputable def betaIntegral (u v : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)
#align complex.beta_integral Complex.betaIntegral
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `betaIntegral_convergent`, showing convergence at the left endpoint. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent_left {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (v : ℂ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 (1 / 2) := by
apply IntervalIntegrable.mul_continuousOn
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow' ?_
rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← zero_sub, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· apply ContinuousAt.continuousOn
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2)] at hx
apply ContinuousAt.cpow
· exact (continuous_const.sub continuous_ofReal).continuousAt
· exact continuousAt_const
· norm_cast
exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 <| by linarith only [hx.2]
#align complex.beta_integral_convergent_left Complex.betaIntegral_convergent_left
/-- The Beta integral is convergent for all `u, v` of positive real part. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean | 80 | 90 | theorem betaIntegral_convergent {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 1 := by |
refine (betaIntegral_convergent_left hu v).trans ?_
rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg]
convert ((betaIntegral_convergent_left hv u).comp_add_right 1).symm using 1
· ext1 x
conv_lhs => rw [mul_comm]
congr 2 <;> · push_cast; ring
· norm_num
· norm_num
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
/-! # Conditional expectation
We build the conditional expectation of an integrable function `f` with value in a Banach space
with respect to a measure `μ` (defined on a measurable space structure `m0`) and a measurable space
structure `m` with `hm : m ≤ m0` (a sub-sigma-algebra). This is an `m`-strongly measurable
function `μ[f|hm]` which is integrable and verifies `∫ x in s, μ[f|hm] x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`
for all `m`-measurable sets `s`. It is unique as an element of `L¹`.
The construction is done in four steps:
* Define the conditional expectation of an `L²` function, as an element of `L²`. This is the
orthogonal projection on the subspace of almost everywhere `m`-measurable functions.
* Show that the conditional expectation of the indicator of a measurable set with finite measure
is integrable and define a map `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E))` which to a set associates a linear
map. That linear map sends `x ∈ E` to the conditional expectation of the indicator of the set
with value `x`.
* Extend that map to `condexpL1CLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E)`. This is done using the same
construction as the Bochner integral (see the file `MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1`).
* Define the conditional expectation of a function `f : α → E`, which is an integrable function
`α → E` equal to 0 if `f` is not integrable, and equal to an `m`-measurable representative of
`condexpL1CLM` applied to `[f]`, the equivalence class of `f` in `L¹`.
The first step is done in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL2`, the two
next steps in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1` and the final step is
performed in this file.
## Main results
The conditional expectation and its properties
* `condexp (m : MeasurableSpace α) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → E)`: conditional expectation of `f`
with respect to `m`.
* `integrable_condexp` : `condexp` is integrable.
* `stronglyMeasurable_condexp` : `condexp` is `m`-strongly-measurable.
* `setIntegral_condexp (hf : Integrable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)` : if `m ≤ m0` (the
σ-algebra over which the measure is defined), then the conditional expectation verifies
`∫ x in s, condexp m μ f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` for any `m`-measurable set `s`.
While `condexp` is function-valued, we also define `condexpL1` with value in `L1` and a continuous
linear map `condexpL1CLM` from `L1` to `L1`. `condexp` should be used in most cases.
Uniqueness of the conditional expectation
* `ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: an a.e. `m`-measurable function which verifies the
equality of integrals is a.e. equal to `condexp`.
## Notations
For a measure `μ` defined on a measurable space structure `m0`, another measurable space structure
`m` with `hm : m ≤ m0` (a sub-σ-algebra) and a function `f`, we define the notation
* `μ[f|m] = condexp m μ f`.
## Tags
conditional expectation, conditional expected value
-/
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α F F' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
open scoped Classical
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → F'} {s : Set α}
/-- Conditional expectation of a function. It is defined as 0 if any one of the following conditions
is true:
- `m` is not a sub-σ-algebra of `m0`,
- `μ` is not σ-finite with respect to `m`,
- `f` is not integrable. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def condexp (m : MeasurableSpace α) {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) (f : α → F') : α → F' :=
if hm : m ≤ m0 then
if h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) ∧ Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else (@aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ m m0 μ hm h.1 _).mk
(@condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hm μ h.1 f)
else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.condexp MeasureTheory.condexp
-- We define notation `μ[f|m]` for the conditional expectation of `f` with respect to `m`.
scoped notation μ "[" f "|" m "]" => MeasureTheory.condexp m μ f
theorem condexp_of_not_le (hm_not : ¬m ≤ m0) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_neg hm_not]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_le MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_le
theorem condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) (hμm_not : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)) :
μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_pos hm, dif_neg]; push_neg; exact fun h => absurd h hμm_not
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
μ[f|m] =
if Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1.mk (condexpL1 hm μ f)
else 0 := by
rw [condexp, dif_pos hm]
simp only [hμm, Ne, true_and_iff]
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [dif_pos hf, if_pos hf]
· rw [dif_neg hf, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → F'}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm, if_pos hfi, if_pos hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_const (hm : m ≤ m0) (c : F') [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
μ[fun _ : α => c|m] = fun _ => c :=
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ _) (integrable_const c)
#align measure_theory.condexp_const MeasureTheory.condexp_const
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (f : α → F') :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1 hm μ f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [if_pos hfi]
by_cases hfm : StronglyMeasurable[m] f
· rw [if_pos hfm]
exact (condexpL1_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' hfm)
hfi).symm
· rw [if_neg hfm]
exact (AEStronglyMeasurable'.ae_eq_mk aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1).symm
rw [if_neg hfi, condexpL1_undef hfi]
exact (coeFn_zero _ _ _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1 MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1CLM F' hm μ (hf.toL1 f) := by
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).trans (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [condexpL1_eq hf]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1_clm MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM
theorem condexp_undef (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_undef MeasureTheory.condexp_undef
@[simp]
theorem condexp_zero : μ[(0 : α → F')|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _) (integrable_zero _ _ _)
#align measure_theory.condexp_zero MeasureTheory.condexp_zero
theorem stronglyMeasurable_condexp : StronglyMeasurable[m] (μ[f|m]) := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
split_ifs with hfi hfm
· exact hfm
· exact AEStronglyMeasurable'.stronglyMeasurable_mk _
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_condexp MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_condexp
theorem condexp_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).trans
(Filter.EventuallyEq.trans (by rw [condexpL1_congr_ae hm h])
(condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm g).symm)
#align measure_theory.condexp_congr_ae MeasureTheory.condexp_congr_ae
theorem condexp_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → F'}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] f := by
refine ((condexp_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk).trans ?_).trans hf.ae_eq_mk.symm
rw [condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk
((integrable_congr hf.ae_eq_mk).mp hfi)]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.condexp_of_aestronglyMeasurable'
theorem integrable_condexp : Integrable (μ[f|m]) μ := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact (integrable_condexpL1 f).congr (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).symm
#align measure_theory.integrable_condexp MeasureTheory.integrable_condexp
/-- The integral of the conditional expectation `μ[f|hm]` over an `m`-measurable set is equal to
the integral of `f` on that set. -/
theorem setIntegral_condexp (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) : ∫ x in s, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) ((condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
exact setIntegral_condexpL1 hf hs
#align measure_theory.set_integral_condexp MeasureTheory.setIntegral_condexp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")] alias set_integral_condexp := setIntegral_condexp
theorem integral_condexp (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
suffices ∫ x in Set.univ, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in Set.univ, f x ∂μ by
simp_rw [integral_univ] at this; exact this
exact setIntegral_condexp hm hf (@MeasurableSet.univ _ m)
#align measure_theory.integral_condexp MeasureTheory.integral_condexp
/-- **Uniqueness of the conditional expectation**
If a function is a.e. `m`-measurable, verifies an integrability condition and has same integral
as `f` on all `m`-measurable sets, then it is a.e. equal to `μ[f|hm]`. -/
theorem ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
{f g : α → F'} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) : g =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' hm hg_int_finite
(fun s _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn) (fun s hs hμs => ?_) hgm
(StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' stronglyMeasurable_condexp)
rw [hg_eq s hs hμs, setIntegral_condexp hm hf hs]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_set_integral_eq := ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
theorem condexp_bot' [hμ : NeZero μ] (f : α → F') :
μ[f|⊥] = fun _ => (μ Set.univ).toReal⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hμ_finite : IsFiniteMeasure μ
swap
· have h : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim bot_le) := by rwa [sigmaFinite_trim_bot_iff]
rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ_finite
rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite bot_le h]
simp only [hμ_finite, ENNReal.top_toReal, inv_zero, zero_smul]
rfl
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [integral_undef hf, smul_zero, condexp_undef hf]; rfl
have h_meas : StronglyMeasurable[⊥] (μ[f|⊥]) := stronglyMeasurable_condexp
obtain ⟨c, h_eq⟩ := stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff.mp h_meas
rw [h_eq]
have h_integral : ∫ x, (μ[f|⊥]) x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := integral_condexp bot_le hf
simp_rw [h_eq, integral_const] at h_integral
rw [← h_integral, ← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul]
rw [Ne, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨NeZero.ne _, measure_ne_top μ Set.univ⟩
#align measure_theory.condexp_bot' MeasureTheory.condexp_bot'
theorem condexp_bot_ae_eq (f : α → F') :
μ[f|⊥] =ᵐ[μ] fun _ => (μ Set.univ).toReal⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· rw [ae_zero]; exact eventually_bot
· exact eventually_of_forall <| congr_fun (condexp_bot' f)
#align measure_theory.condexp_bot_ae_eq MeasureTheory.condexp_bot_ae_eq
theorem condexp_bot [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → F') : μ[f|⊥] = fun _ => ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
refine (condexp_bot' f).trans ?_; rw [measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, inv_one, one_smul]
#align measure_theory.condexp_bot MeasureTheory.condexp_bot
theorem condexp_add (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
μ[f + g|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] + μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; simp
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; simp
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).trans ?_
rw [condexpL1_add hf hg]
exact (coeFn_add _ _).trans
((condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).symm.add (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).symm)
#align measure_theory.condexp_add MeasureTheory.condexp_add
theorem condexp_finset_sum {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α → F'}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) : μ[∑ i ∈ s, f i|m] =ᵐ[μ] ∑ i ∈ s, μ[f i|m] := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s his heq hf
· rw [Finset.sum_empty, Finset.sum_empty, condexp_zero]
· rw [Finset.sum_insert his, Finset.sum_insert his]
exact (condexp_add (hf i <| Finset.mem_insert_self i s) <|
integrable_finset_sum' _ fun j hmem => hf j <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hmem).trans
((EventuallyEq.refl _ _).add (heq fun j hmem => hf j <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hmem))
#align measure_theory.condexp_finset_sum MeasureTheory.condexp_finset_sum
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Basic.lean | 308 | 318 | theorem condexp_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α → F') : μ[c • f|m] =ᵐ[μ] c • μ[f|m] := by |
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; simp
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; simp
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).trans ?_
rw [condexpL1_smul c f]
refine (@condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ m _ _ hm _ f).mp ?_
refine (coeFn_smul c (condexpL1 hm μ f)).mono fun x hx1 hx2 => ?_
simp only [hx1, hx2, Pi.smul_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
/-!
# Integrals involving the Gamma function
In this file, we collect several integrals over `ℝ` or `ℂ` that evaluate in terms of the
`Real.Gamma` function.
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
section real
theorem integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hq : - 1 < q) :
∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x ^ q * exp (- x ^ p) = (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / p * x ^ (1 / p - 1)) • ((x ^ (1 / p)) ^ q * exp (-x)) := by
rw [← integral_comp_rpow_Ioi _ (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp)),
abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt (one_div_pos.mpr hp))]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx) _ p, one_div_mul_cancel (ne_of_gt hp), rpow_one]
_ = ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, 1 / p * exp (-x) * x ^ (1 / p - 1 + q / p) := by
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx), div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul, rpow_add hx]
ring_nf
_ = (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral (div_pos (neg_lt_iff_pos_add.mp hq) hp)]
simp_rw [show 1 / p - 1 + q / p = (q + 1) / p - 1 by field_simp; ring, ← integral_mul_left,
← mul_assoc]
theorem integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p q b : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hq : - 1 < q) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x ^ q * exp (- b * x ^ p) =
b ^ (-(q + 1) / p) * (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * ((b ^ p⁻¹ * x) ^ q * rexp (-(b ^ p⁻¹ * x) ^ p)) := by
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [mul_rpow _ (le_of_lt hx), mul_rpow _ (le_of_lt hx), ← rpow_mul, ← rpow_mul,
inv_mul_cancel, rpow_one, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← rpow_add, neg_mul p⁻¹, add_left_neg,
rpow_zero, one_mul, neg_mul]
all_goals positivity
_ = (b ^ p⁻¹)⁻¹ * ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * (x ^ q * rexp (-x ^ p)) := by
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x => b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * (x ^ q * exp (- x ^ p))) 0,
mul_zero, smul_eq_mul]
all_goals positivity
_ = b ^ (-(q + 1) / p) * (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
rw [integral_mul_left, integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow _ hq, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul, ← rpow_add]
· congr; ring
all_goals positivity
theorem integral_exp_neg_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) :
∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), exp (- x ^ p) = Gamma (1 / p + 1) := by
convert (integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow hp neg_one_lt_zero) using 1
· simp_rw [rpow_zero, one_mul]
· rw [zero_add, Gamma_add_one (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp))]
theorem integral_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p b : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), exp (- b * x ^ p) = b ^ (- 1 / p) * Gamma (1 / p + 1) := by
convert (integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow hp neg_one_lt_zero hb) using 1
· simp_rw [rpow_zero, one_mul]
· rw [zero_add, Gamma_add_one (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp)), mul_assoc]
end real
section complex
theorem Complex.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p q : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hq : - 2 < q) :
∫ x : ℂ, ‖x‖ ^ q * rexp (- ‖x‖ ^ p) = (2 * π / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ) ×ˢ Ioo (-π) π, x.1 * (|x.1| ^ q * rexp (-|x.1| ^ p)) := by
rw [← Complex.integral_comp_polarCoord_symm, polarCoord_target]
simp_rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.polardCoord_symm_abs, smul_eq_mul]
_ = (∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (-|x| ^ p)) * ∫ _ in Ioo (-π) π, 1 := by
rw [← setIntegral_prod_mul, volume_eq_prod]
simp_rw [mul_one]
congr! 2; ring
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (-|x| ^ p) := by
simp_rw [integral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
volume_Ioo, sub_neg_eq_add, ← two_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (by positivity : 0 ≤ 2 * π),
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, mul_comm]
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x ^ (q + 1) * rexp (-x ^ p) := by
congr 1
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt (by exact hx)), rpow_add hx, rpow_one]
ring
_ = (2 * Real.pi / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
rw [_root_.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow (by linarith) (by linarith), add_assoc,
one_add_one_eq_two]
ring
theorem Complex.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p q b : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hq : - 2 < q)
(hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x : ℂ, ‖x‖ ^ q * rexp (- b * ‖x‖ ^ p) = (2 * π / p) *
b ^ (-(q + 2) / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ) ×ˢ Ioo (-π) π, x.1 * (|x.1| ^ q * rexp (- b * |x.1| ^ p)) := by
rw [← Complex.integral_comp_polarCoord_symm, polarCoord_target]
simp_rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.polardCoord_symm_abs, smul_eq_mul]
_ = (∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (- b * |x| ^ p)) * ∫ _ in Ioo (-π) π, 1 := by
rw [← setIntegral_prod_mul, volume_eq_prod]
simp_rw [mul_one]
congr! 2; ring
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (- b * |x| ^ p) := by
simp_rw [integral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
volume_Ioo, sub_neg_eq_add, ← two_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (by positivity : 0 ≤ 2 * π),
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, mul_comm]
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0:ℝ), x ^ (q + 1) * rexp (-b * x ^ p) := by
congr 1
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt (by exact hx)), rpow_add hx, rpow_one]
ring
_ = (2 * π / p) * b ^ (-(q + 2) / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
rw [_root_.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow (by linarith) (by linarith) hb, add_assoc,
one_add_one_eq_two]
ring
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Gamma.lean | 125 | 130 | theorem Complex.integral_exp_neg_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
∫ x : ℂ, rexp (- ‖x‖ ^ p) = π * Real.Gamma (2 / p + 1) := by |
convert (integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow hp (by linarith : (-2:ℝ) < 0)) using 1
· simp_rw [norm_eq_abs, rpow_zero, one_mul]
· rw [zero_add, Real.Gamma_add_one (div_ne_zero two_ne_zero (by linarith))]
ring
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.UnitInterval
#align_import topology.path_connected from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Path connectedness
## Main definitions
In the file the unit interval `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is denoted by `I`, and `X` is a topological space.
* `Path (x y : X)` is the type of paths from `x` to `y`, i.e., continuous maps from `I` to `X`
mapping `0` to `x` and `1` to `y`.
* `Path.map` is the image of a path under a continuous map.
* `Joined (x y : X)` means there is a path between `x` and `y`.
* `Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y)` selects some path between two points `x` and `y`.
* `pathComponent (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x`.
* `PathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is non-empty and every two
points of `X` are joined.
Then there are corresponding relative notions for `F : Set X`.
* `JoinedIn F (x y : X)` means there is a path `γ` joining `x` to `y` with values in `F`.
* `JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y)` selects a path from `x` to `y` inside `F`.
* `pathComponentIn F (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x` in `F`.
* `IsPathConnected F` asserts that `F` is non-empty and every two
points of `F` are joined in `F`.
* `LocPathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is locally path-connected:
each point has a basis of path-connected neighborhoods (we do *not* ask these to be open).
## Main theorems
* `Joined` and `JoinedIn F` are transitive relations.
One can link the absolute and relative version in two directions, using `(univ : Set X)` or the
subtype `↥F`.
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X)`
* `isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace ↥F`
For locally path connected spaces, we have
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_connectedSpace : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ ConnectedSpace X`
* `IsOpen.isConnected_iff_isPathConnected (U_op : IsOpen U) : IsPathConnected U ↔ IsConnected U`
## Implementation notes
By default, all paths have `I` as their source and `X` as their target, but there is an
operation `Set.IccExtend` that will extend any continuous map `γ : I → X` into a continuous map
`IccExtend zero_le_one γ : ℝ → X` that is constant before `0` and after `1`.
This is used to define `Path.extend` that turns `γ : Path x y` into a continuous map
`γ.extend : ℝ → X` whose restriction to `I` is the original `γ`, and is equal to `x`
on `(-∞, 0]` and to `y` on `[1, +∞)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
/-! ### Paths -/
/-- Continuous path connecting two points `x` and `y` in a topological space -/
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure Path (x y : X) extends C(I, X) where
/-- The start point of a `Path`. -/
source' : toFun 0 = x
/-- The end point of a `Path`. -/
target' : toFun 1 = y
#align path Path
instance Path.funLike : FunLike (Path x y) I X where
coe := fun γ ↦ ⇑γ.toContinuousMap
coe_injective' := fun γ₁ γ₂ h => by
simp only [DFunLike.coe_fn_eq] at h
cases γ₁; cases γ₂; congr
-- Porting note (#10754): added this instance so that we can use `FunLike.coe` for `CoeFun`
-- this also fixed very strange `simp` timeout issues
instance Path.continuousMapClass : ContinuousMapClass (Path x y) I X where
map_continuous := fun γ => show Continuous γ.toContinuousMap by continuity
-- Porting note: not necessary in light of the instance above
/-
instance : CoeFun (Path x y) fun _ => I → X :=
⟨fun p => p.toFun⟩
-/
@[ext]
protected theorem Path.ext : ∀ {γ₁ γ₂ : Path x y}, (γ₁ : I → X) = γ₂ → γ₁ = γ₂ := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, h11⟩, h12, h13⟩ ⟨⟨x, h21⟩, h22, h23⟩ rfl
rfl
#align path.ext Path.ext
namespace Path
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk_mk (f : I → X) (h₁) (h₂ : f 0 = x) (h₃ : f 1 = y) :
⇑(mk ⟨f, h₁⟩ h₂ h₃ : Path x y) = f :=
rfl
#align path.coe_mk Path.coe_mk_mk
-- Porting note: the name `Path.coe_mk` better refers to a new lemma below
variable (γ : Path x y)
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous γ :=
γ.continuous_toFun
#align path.continuous Path.continuous
@[simp]
protected theorem source : γ 0 = x :=
γ.source'
#align path.source Path.source
@[simp]
protected theorem target : γ 1 = y :=
γ.target'
#align path.target Path.target
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def simps.apply : I → X :=
γ
#align path.simps.apply Path.simps.apply
initialize_simps_projections Path (toFun → simps.apply, -toContinuousMap)
@[simp]
theorem coe_toContinuousMap : ⇑γ.toContinuousMap = γ :=
rfl
#align path.coe_to_continuous_map Path.coe_toContinuousMap
-- Porting note: this is needed because of the `Path.continuousMapClass` instance
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk : ⇑(γ : C(I, X)) = γ :=
rfl
/-- Any function `φ : Π (a : α), Path (x a) (y a)` can be seen as a function `α × I → X`. -/
instance hasUncurryPath {X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {x y : α → X} :
HasUncurry (∀ a : α, Path (x a) (y a)) (α × I) X :=
⟨fun φ p => φ p.1 p.2⟩
#align path.has_uncurry_path Path.hasUncurryPath
/-- The constant path from a point to itself -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (x : X) : Path x x where
toFun _t := x
continuous_toFun := continuous_const
source' := rfl
target' := rfl
#align path.refl Path.refl
@[simp]
theorem refl_range {a : X} : range (Path.refl a) = {a} := by simp [Path.refl, CoeFun.coe]
#align path.refl_range Path.refl_range
/-- The reverse of a path from `x` to `y`, as a path from `y` to `x` -/
@[symm, simps]
def symm (γ : Path x y) : Path y x where
toFun := γ ∘ σ
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simpa [-Path.target] using γ.target
target' := by simpa [-Path.source] using γ.source
#align path.symm Path.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (γ : Path x y) : γ.symm.symm = γ := by
ext t
show γ (σ (σ t)) = γ t
rw [unitInterval.symm_symm]
#align path.symm_symm Path.symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Path.symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm {a : X} : (Path.refl a).symm = Path.refl a := by
ext
rfl
#align path.refl_symm Path.refl_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) : range γ.symm = range γ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_range, Path.symm, DFunLike.coe, unitInterval.symm, SetCoe.exists, comp_apply,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩ <;> refine ⟨1 - y, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp hy, ?_⟩ <;>
convert hxy
simp
#align path.symm_range Path.symm_range
/-! #### Space of paths -/
open ContinuousMap
/- porting note: because of the `DFunLike` instance, we already have a coercion to `C(I, X)`
so we avoid adding another.
--instance : Coe (Path x y) C(I, X) :=
--⟨fun γ => γ.1⟩
-/
/-- The following instance defines the topology on the path space to be induced from the
compact-open topology on the space `C(I,X)` of continuous maps from `I` to `X`.
-/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (Path x y) :=
TopologicalSpace.induced ((↑) : _ → C(I, X)) ContinuousMap.compactOpen
theorem continuous_eval : Continuous fun p : Path x y × I => p.1 p.2 :=
continuous_eval.comp <| (continuous_induced_dom (α := Path x y)).prod_map continuous_id
#align path.continuous_eval Path.continuous_eval
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_eval {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → I}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun y => f y (g y) :=
Continuous.comp continuous_eval (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align continuous.path_eval Continuous.path_eval
theorem continuous_uncurry_iff {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : Y → Path x y} :
Continuous ↿g ↔ Continuous g :=
Iff.symm <| continuous_induced_rng.trans
⟨fun h => continuous_uncurry_of_continuous ⟨_, h⟩,
continuous_of_continuous_uncurry (fun (y : Y) ↦ ContinuousMap.mk (g y))⟩
#align path.continuous_uncurry_iff Path.continuous_uncurry_iff
/-- A continuous map extending a path to `ℝ`, constant before `0` and after `1`. -/
def extend : ℝ → X :=
IccExtend zero_le_one γ
#align path.extend Path.extend
/-- See Note [continuity lemma statement]. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_extend {γ : Y → Path x y} {f : Y → ℝ} (hγ : Continuous ↿γ)
(hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun t => (γ t).extend (f t) :=
Continuous.IccExtend hγ hf
#align continuous.path_extend Continuous.path_extend
/-- A useful special case of `Continuous.path_extend`. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_extend : Continuous γ.extend :=
γ.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align path.continuous_extend Path.continuous_extend
theorem _root_.Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
{l r : Y → X} {y : Y} {l₁ : Filter ℝ} {l₂ : Filter X} {γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y)}
(hγ : Tendsto (↿γ) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁.map (projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one)) l₂) :
Tendsto (↿fun x => (γ x).extend) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁) l₂ :=
Filter.Tendsto.IccExtend _ hγ
#align filter.tendsto.path_extend Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
theorem _root_.ContinuousAt.path_extend {g : Y → ℝ} {l r : Y → X} (γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y))
{y : Y} (hγ : ContinuousAt (↿γ) (y, projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (g y))) (hg : ContinuousAt g y) :
ContinuousAt (fun i => (γ i).extend (g i)) y :=
hγ.IccExtend (fun x => γ x) hg
#align continuous_at.path_extend ContinuousAt.path_extend
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ∈ (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
IccExtend_of_mem _ γ ht
#align path.extend_extends Path.extend_extends
theorem extend_zero : γ.extend 0 = x := by simp
#align path.extend_zero Path.extend_zero
theorem extend_one : γ.extend 1 = y := by simp
#align path.extend_one Path.extend_one
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends' {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t : (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ t :=
IccExtend_val _ γ t
#align path.extend_extends' Path.extend_extends'
@[simp]
theorem extend_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
range γ.extend = range γ :=
IccExtend_range _ γ
#align path.extend_range Path.extend_range
theorem extend_of_le_zero {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : γ.extend t = a :=
(IccExtend_of_le_left _ _ ht).trans γ.source
#align path.extend_of_le_zero Path.extend_of_le_zero
theorem extend_of_one_le {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : 1 ≤ t) : γ.extend t = b :=
(IccExtend_of_right_le _ _ ht).trans γ.target
#align path.extend_of_one_le Path.extend_of_one_le
@[simp]
theorem refl_extend {a : X} : (Path.refl a).extend = fun _ => a :=
rfl
#align path.refl_extend Path.refl_extend
/-- The path obtained from a map defined on `ℝ` by restriction to the unit interval. -/
def ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) : Path x y where
toFun := f ∘ ((↑) : unitInterval → ℝ)
continuous_toFun := hf.comp_continuous continuous_subtype_val Subtype.prop
source' := h₀
target' := h₁
#align path.of_line Path.ofLine
theorem ofLine_mem {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) :
∀ t, ofLine hf h₀ h₁ t ∈ f '' I := fun ⟨t, t_in⟩ => ⟨t, t_in, rfl⟩
#align path.of_line_mem Path.ofLine_mem
attribute [local simp] Iic_def
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
/-- Concatenation of two paths from `x` to `y` and from `y` to `z`, putting the first
path on `[0, 1/2]` and the second one on `[1/2, 1]`. -/
@[trans]
def trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : Path x z where
toFun := (fun t : ℝ => if t ≤ 1 / 2 then γ.extend (2 * t) else γ'.extend (2 * t - 1)) ∘ (↑)
continuous_toFun := by
refine
(Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ continuous_id continuous_const (by norm_num)).comp
continuous_subtype_val <;>
continuity
source' := by norm_num
target' := by norm_num
#align path.trans Path.trans
theorem trans_apply (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) (t : I) :
(γ.trans γ') t =
if h : (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then γ ⟨2 * t, (mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two).2 ⟨t.2.1, h⟩⟩
else γ' ⟨2 * t - 1, two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff.2 ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, t.2.2⟩⟩ :=
show ite _ _ _ = _ by split_ifs <;> rw [extend_extends]
#align path.trans_apply Path.trans_apply
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : (γ.trans γ').symm = γ'.symm.trans γ.symm := by
ext t
simp only [trans_apply, ← one_div, symm_apply, not_le, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h h₁ h₂ <;> rw [coe_symm_eq] at h
· have ht : (t : ℝ) = 1 / 2 := by linarith
norm_num [ht]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, mul_sub]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [mul_sub, h]
ring -- TODO norm_num should really do this
· exfalso
linarith
#align path.trans_symm Path.trans_symm
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans_refl {a : X} :
(Path.refl a).trans (Path.refl a) = Path.refl a := by
ext
simp only [Path.trans, ite_self, one_div, Path.refl_extend]
rfl
#align path.refl_trans_refl Path.refl_trans_refl
theorem trans_range {a b c : X} (γ₁ : Path a b) (γ₂ : Path b c) :
range (γ₁.trans γ₂) = range γ₁ ∪ range γ₂ := by
rw [Path.trans]
apply eq_of_subset_of_subset
· rintro x ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩
by_cases h : t ≤ 1 / 2
· left
use ⟨2 * t, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₁.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos h] at hxt
· right
use ⟨2 * t - 1, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₂.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_neg h] at hxt
· rintro x (⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩ | ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩)
· use ⟨t / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
have : t / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := (div_le_div_right (zero_lt_two : (0 : ℝ) < 2)).mpr ht1
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos this, Subtype.coe_mk]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₁.extend_extends]
· by_cases h : t = 0
· use ⟨1 / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos le_rfl, Subtype.coe_mk,
mul_one_div_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
rw [γ₁.extend_one]
rwa [← γ₂.extend_extends, h, γ₂.extend_zero] at hxt
· use ⟨(t + 1) / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
replace h : t ≠ 0 := h
have ht0 := lt_of_le_of_ne ht0 h.symm
have : ¬(t + 1) / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [not_le]
linarith
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, if_neg this]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₂.extend_extends]
#align path.trans_range Path.trans_range
/-- Image of a path from `x` to `y` by a map which is continuous on the path. -/
def map' (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : ContinuousOn f (range γ)) : Path (f x) (f y) where
toFun := f ∘ γ
continuous_toFun := h.comp_continuous γ.continuous (fun x ↦ mem_range_self x)
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
/-- Image of a path from `x` to `y` by a continuous map -/
def map (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Path (f x) (f y) := γ.map' h.continuousOn
#align path.map Path.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h : I → Y) = f ∘ γ := by
ext t
rfl
#align path.map_coe Path.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_symm (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h).symm = γ.symm.map h :=
rfl
#align path.map_symm Path.map_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) {f : X → Y}
(h : Continuous f) : (γ.trans γ').map h = (γ.map h).trans (γ'.map h) := by
ext t
rw [trans_apply, map_coe, Function.comp_apply, trans_apply]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align path.map_trans Path.map_trans
@[simp]
theorem map_id (γ : Path x y) : γ.map continuous_id = γ := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_id Path.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_map (γ : Path x y) {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Z]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {g : Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) :
(γ.map hf).map hg = γ.map (hg.comp hf) := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_map Path.map_map
/-- Casting a path from `x` to `y` to a path from `x'` to `y'` when `x' = x` and `y' = y` -/
def cast (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : Path x' y' where
toFun := γ
continuous_toFun := γ.continuous
source' := by simp [hx]
target' := by simp [hy]
#align path.cast Path.cast
@[simp]
theorem symm_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).symm = γ.symm.cast hb ha :=
rfl
#align path.symm_cast Path.symm_cast
@[simp]
theorem trans_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ c₁ c₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂)
(γ' : Path b₂ c₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) (hc : c₁ = c₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).trans (γ'.cast hb hc) = (γ.trans γ').cast ha hc :=
rfl
#align path.trans_cast Path.trans_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_coe (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : (γ.cast hx hy : I → X) = γ :=
rfl
#align path.cast_coe Path.cast_coe
@[continuity]
theorem symm_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).symm :=
h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_symm)
#align path.symm_continuous_family Path.symm_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous (symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
continuous_uncurry_iff.mp <| symm_continuous_family _ (continuous_fst.path_eval continuous_snd)
#align path.continuous_symm Path.continuous_symm
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).extend := by
apply h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_projIcc)
exact zero_le_one
#align path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem trans_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b c : ι → X} (γ₁ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h₁ : Continuous ↿γ₁)
(γ₂ : ∀ t : ι, Path (b t) (c t)) (h₂ : Continuous ↿γ₂) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ₁ t).trans (γ₂ t) := by
have h₁' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₁ h₁
have h₂' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₂ h₂
simp only [HasUncurry.uncurry, CoeFun.coe, Path.trans, (· ∘ ·)]
refine Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd) continuous_const ?_
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₁ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x : I → ℝ))
exact h₁'.comp (continuous_id.prod_map <| continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val)
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₂ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x - 1 : I → ℝ))
exact
h₂'.comp
(continuous_id.prod_map <|
(continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val).sub continuous_const)
· rintro st hst
simp [hst, mul_inv_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
#align path.trans_continuous_family Path.trans_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_trans {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → Path y z} :
Continuous f → Continuous g → Continuous fun t => (f t).trans (g t) := by
intro hf hg
apply continuous_uncurry_iff.mp
exact trans_continuous_family _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hf) _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hg)
#align continuous.path_trans Continuous.path_trans
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_trans {x y z : X} : Continuous fun ρ : Path x y × Path y z => ρ.1.trans ρ.2 :=
continuous_fst.path_trans continuous_snd
#align path.continuous_trans Path.continuous_trans
/-! #### Product of paths -/
section Prod
variable {a₁ a₂ a₃ : X} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : Y}
/-- Given a path in `X` and a path in `Y`, we can take their pointwise product to get a path in
`X × Y`. -/
protected def prod (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) : Path (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) where
toContinuousMap := ContinuousMap.prodMk γ₁.toContinuousMap γ₂.toContinuousMap
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
#align path.prod Path.prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_coe (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) :
⇑(γ₁.prod γ₂) = fun t => (γ₁ t, γ₂ t) :=
rfl
#align path.prod_coe_fn Path.prod_coe
/-- Path composition commutes with products -/
theorem trans_prod_eq_prod_trans (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (δ₁ : Path a₂ a₃) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂)
(δ₂ : Path b₂ b₃) : (γ₁.prod γ₂).trans (δ₁.prod δ₂) = (γ₁.trans δ₁).prod (γ₂.trans δ₂) := by
ext t <;>
unfold Path.trans <;>
simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, Path.prod_coe, Function.comp_apply] <;>
split_ifs <;>
rfl
#align path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans Path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans
end Prod
section Pi
variable {χ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (χ i)] {as bs cs : ∀ i, χ i}
/-- Given a family of paths, one in each Xᵢ, we take their pointwise product to get a path in
Π i, Xᵢ. -/
protected def pi (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) : Path as bs where
toContinuousMap := ContinuousMap.pi fun i => (γ i).toContinuousMap
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
#align path.pi Path.pi
@[simp]
theorem pi_coe (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) : ⇑(Path.pi γ) = fun t i => γ i t :=
rfl
#align path.pi_coe_fn Path.pi_coe
/-- Path composition commutes with products -/
theorem trans_pi_eq_pi_trans (γ₀ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) (γ₁ : ∀ i, Path (bs i) (cs i)) :
(Path.pi γ₀).trans (Path.pi γ₁) = Path.pi fun i => (γ₀ i).trans (γ₁ i) := by
ext t i
unfold Path.trans
simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, pi_coe]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans
end Pi
/-! #### Pointwise multiplication/addition of two paths in a topological (additive) group -/
/-- Pointwise multiplication of paths in a topological group. The additive version is probably more
useful. -/
@[to_additive "Pointwise addition of paths in a topological additive group."]
protected def mul [Mul X] [ContinuousMul X] {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : X} (γ₁ : Path a₁ b₁) (γ₂ : Path a₂ b₂) :
Path (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) :=
(γ₁.prod γ₂).map continuous_mul
#align path.mul Path.mul
#align path.add Path.add
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_apply [Mul X] [ContinuousMul X] {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : X} (γ₁ : Path a₁ b₁)
(γ₂ : Path a₂ b₂) (t : unitInterval) : (γ₁.mul γ₂) t = γ₁ t * γ₂ t :=
rfl
#align path.mul_apply Path.mul_apply
#align path.add_apply Path.add_apply
/-! #### Truncating a path -/
/-- `γ.truncate t₀ t₁` is the path which follows the path `γ` on the
time interval `[t₀, t₁]` and stays still otherwise. -/
def truncate {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t₀ t₁ : ℝ) :
Path (γ.extend <| min t₀ t₁) (γ.extend t₁) where
toFun s := γ.extend (min (max s t₀) t₁)
continuous_toFun :=
γ.continuous_extend.comp ((continuous_subtype_val.max continuous_const).min continuous_const)
source' := by
simp only [min_def, max_def']
norm_cast
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
· simp [γ.extend_of_le_zero h₁]
· congr
linarith
· have h₄ : t₁ ≤ 0 := le_of_lt (by simpa using h₂)
simp [γ.extend_of_le_zero h₄, γ.extend_of_le_zero h₁]
all_goals rfl
target' := by
simp only [min_def, max_def']
norm_cast
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃
· simp [γ.extend_of_one_le h₂]
· rfl
· have h₄ : 1 ≤ t₀ := le_of_lt (by simpa using h₁)
simp [γ.extend_of_one_le h₄, γ.extend_of_one_le (h₄.trans h₃)]
· rfl
#align path.truncate Path.truncate
/-- `γ.truncateOfLE t₀ t₁ h`, where `h : t₀ ≤ t₁` is `γ.truncate t₀ t₁`
casted as a path from `γ.extend t₀` to `γ.extend t₁`. -/
def truncateOfLE {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t₀ t₁ : ℝ}
(h : t₀ ≤ t₁) : Path (γ.extend t₀) (γ.extend t₁) :=
(γ.truncate t₀ t₁).cast (by rw [min_eq_left h]) rfl
#align path.truncate_of_le Path.truncateOfLE
theorem truncate_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t₀ t₁ : ℝ} :
range (γ.truncate t₀ t₁) ⊆ range γ := by
rw [← γ.extend_range]
simp only [range_subset_iff, SetCoe.exists, SetCoe.forall]
intro x _hx
simp only [DFunLike.coe, Path.truncate, mem_range_self]
#align path.truncate_range Path.truncate_range
/-- For a path `γ`, `γ.truncate` gives a "continuous family of paths", by which we
mean the uncurried function which maps `(t₀, t₁, s)` to `γ.truncate t₀ t₁ s` is continuous. -/
@[continuity]
theorem truncate_continuous_family {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
Continuous (fun x => γ.truncate x.1 x.2.1 x.2.2 : ℝ × ℝ × I → X) :=
γ.continuous_extend.comp
(((continuous_subtype_val.comp (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)).max continuous_fst).min
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
#align path.truncate_continuous_family Path.truncate_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem truncate_const_continuous_family {a b : X} (γ : Path a b)
(t : ℝ) : Continuous ↿(γ.truncate t) := by
have key : Continuous (fun x => (t, x) : ℝ × I → ℝ × ℝ × I) := by continuity
exact γ.truncate_continuous_family.comp key
#align path.truncate_const_continuous_family Path.truncate_const_continuous_family
@[simp]
theorem truncate_self {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t : ℝ) :
γ.truncate t t = (Path.refl <| γ.extend t).cast (by rw [min_self]) rfl := by
ext x
rw [cast_coe]
simp only [truncate, DFunLike.coe, refl, min_def, max_def]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> congr
#align path.truncate_self Path.truncate_self
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: increase `simp` priority so left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem truncate_zero_zero {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 0 0 = (Path.refl a).cast (by rw [min_self, γ.extend_zero]) γ.extend_zero := by
convert γ.truncate_self 0
#align path.truncate_zero_zero Path.truncate_zero_zero
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: increase `simp` priority so left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem truncate_one_one {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 1 1 = (Path.refl b).cast (by rw [min_self, γ.extend_one]) γ.extend_one := by
convert γ.truncate_self 1
#align path.truncate_one_one Path.truncate_one_one
@[simp]
theorem truncate_zero_one {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 0 1 = γ.cast (by simp [zero_le_one, extend_zero]) (by simp) := by
ext x
rw [cast_coe]
have : ↑x ∈ (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ) := x.2
rw [truncate, coe_mk_mk, max_eq_left this.1, min_eq_left this.2, extend_extends']
#align path.truncate_zero_one Path.truncate_zero_one
/-! #### Reparametrising a path -/
/-- Given a path `γ` and a function `f : I → I` where `f 0 = 0` and `f 1 = 1`, `γ.reparam f` is the
path defined by `γ ∘ f`.
-/
def reparam (γ : Path x y) (f : I → I) (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) :
Path x y where
toFun := γ ∘ f
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simp [hf₀]
target' := by simp [hf₁]
#align path.reparam Path.reparam
@[simp]
theorem coe_reparam (γ : Path x y) {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
(hf₁ : f 1 = 1) : ⇑(γ.reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁) = γ ∘ f :=
rfl
#align path.coe_to_fun Path.coe_reparam
-- Porting note: this seems like it was poorly named (was: `coe_to_fun`)
@[simp]
theorem reparam_id (γ : Path x y) : γ.reparam id continuous_id rfl rfl = γ := by
ext
rfl
#align path.reparam_id Path.reparam_id
theorem range_reparam (γ : Path x y) {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
(hf₁ : f 1 = 1) : range (γ.reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁) = range γ := by
change range (γ ∘ f) = range γ
have : range f = univ := by
rw [range_iff_surjective]
intro t
have h₁ : Continuous (Set.IccExtend (zero_le_one' ℝ) f) := by continuity
have := intermediate_value_Icc (zero_le_one' ℝ) h₁.continuousOn
· rw [IccExtend_left, IccExtend_right, Icc.mk_zero, Icc.mk_one, hf₀, hf₁] at this
rcases this t.2 with ⟨w, hw₁, hw₂⟩
rw [IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hw₁] at hw₂
exact ⟨_, hw₂⟩
rw [range_comp, this, image_univ]
#align path.range_reparam Path.range_reparam
theorem refl_reparam {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) :
(refl x).reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁ = refl x := by
ext
simp
#align path.refl_reparam Path.refl_reparam
end Path
/-! ### Being joined by a path -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path". This is an equivalence relation. -/
def Joined (x y : X) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Path x y)
#align joined Joined
@[refl]
theorem Joined.refl (x : X) : Joined x x :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
#align joined.refl Joined.refl
/-- When two points are joined, choose some path from `x` to `y`. -/
def Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some h
#align joined.some_path Joined.somePath
@[symm]
theorem Joined.symm {x y : X} (h : Joined x y) : Joined y x :=
⟨h.somePath.symm⟩
#align joined.symm Joined.symm
@[trans]
theorem Joined.trans {x y z : X} (hxy : Joined x y) (hyz : Joined y z) : Joined x z :=
⟨hxy.somePath.trans hyz.somePath⟩
#align joined.trans Joined.trans
variable (X)
/-- The setoid corresponding the equivalence relation of being joined by a continuous path. -/
def pathSetoid : Setoid X where
r := Joined
iseqv := Equivalence.mk Joined.refl Joined.symm Joined.trans
#align path_setoid pathSetoid
/-- The quotient type of points of a topological space modulo being joined by a continuous path. -/
def ZerothHomotopy :=
Quotient (pathSetoid X)
#align zeroth_homotopy ZerothHomotopy
instance ZerothHomotopy.inhabited : Inhabited (ZerothHomotopy ℝ) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' ℝ (pathSetoid ℝ) 0⟩
variable {X}
/-! ### Being joined by a path inside a set -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path in `F`". Not quite an equivalence relation since it's not
reflexive for points that do not belong to `F`. -/
def JoinedIn (F : Set X) (x y : X) : Prop :=
∃ γ : Path x y, ∀ t, γ t ∈ F
#align joined_in JoinedIn
variable {F : Set X}
theorem JoinedIn.mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F ∧ y ∈ F := by
rcases h with ⟨γ, γ_in⟩
have : γ 0 ∈ F ∧ γ 1 ∈ F := by constructor <;> apply γ_in
simpa using this
#align joined_in.mem JoinedIn.mem
theorem JoinedIn.source_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F :=
h.mem.1
#align joined_in.source_mem JoinedIn.source_mem
theorem JoinedIn.target_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : y ∈ F :=
h.mem.2
#align joined_in.target_mem JoinedIn.target_mem
/-- When `x` and `y` are joined in `F`, choose a path from `x` to `y` inside `F` -/
def JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Path x y :=
Classical.choose h
#align joined_in.some_path JoinedIn.somePath
theorem JoinedIn.somePath_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) (t : I) : h.somePath t ∈ F :=
Classical.choose_spec h t
#align joined_in.some_path_mem JoinedIn.somePath_mem
/-- If `x` and `y` are joined in the set `F`, then they are joined in the subtype `F`. -/
theorem JoinedIn.joined_subtype (h : JoinedIn F x y) :
Joined (⟨x, h.source_mem⟩ : F) (⟨y, h.target_mem⟩ : F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun t => ⟨h.somePath t, h.somePath_mem t⟩
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simp
target' := by simp }⟩
#align joined_in.joined_subtype JoinedIn.joined_subtype
theorem JoinedIn.ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y)
(hF : f '' I ⊆ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨Path.ofLine hf h₀ h₁, fun t => hF <| Path.ofLine_mem hf h₀ h₁ t⟩
#align joined_in.of_line JoinedIn.ofLine
theorem JoinedIn.joined (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Joined x y :=
⟨h.somePath⟩
#align joined_in.joined JoinedIn.joined
theorem joinedIn_iff_joined (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
JoinedIn F x y ↔ Joined (⟨x, x_in⟩ : F) (⟨y, y_in⟩ : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.joined_subtype, fun h => ⟨h.somePath.map continuous_subtype_val, by simp⟩⟩
#align joined_in_iff_joined joinedIn_iff_joined
@[simp]
theorem joinedIn_univ : JoinedIn univ x y ↔ Joined x y := by
simp [JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align joined_in_univ joinedIn_univ
theorem JoinedIn.mono {U V : Set X} (h : JoinedIn U x y) (hUV : U ⊆ V) : JoinedIn V x y :=
⟨h.somePath, fun t => hUV (h.somePath_mem t)⟩
#align joined_in.mono JoinedIn.mono
theorem JoinedIn.refl (h : x ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x x :=
⟨Path.refl x, fun _t => h⟩
#align joined_in.refl JoinedIn.refl
@[symm]
theorem JoinedIn.symm (h : JoinedIn F x y) : JoinedIn F y x := by
cases' h.mem with hx hy
simp_all [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact h.symm
#align joined_in.symm JoinedIn.symm
theorem JoinedIn.trans (hxy : JoinedIn F x y) (hyz : JoinedIn F y z) : JoinedIn F x z := by
cases' hxy.mem with hx hy
cases' hyz.mem with hx hy
simp_all [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact hxy.trans hyz
#align joined_in.trans JoinedIn.trans
theorem Specializes.joinedIn (h : x ⤳ y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨Set.piecewise {1} (const I y) (const I x), ?_⟩, by simp, by simp⟩, fun t ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isClosed_singleton.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes continuous_const continuous_const
fun _ ↦ h
· simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, piecewise]
split_ifs <;> assumption
theorem Inseparable.joinedIn (h : Inseparable x y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
h.specializes.joinedIn hx hy
/-! ### Path component -/
/-- The path component of `x` is the set of points that can be joined to `x`. -/
def pathComponent (x : X) :=
{ y | Joined x y }
#align path_component pathComponent
@[simp]
theorem mem_pathComponent_self (x : X) : x ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.refl x
#align mem_path_component_self mem_pathComponent_self
@[simp]
theorem pathComponent.nonempty (x : X) : (pathComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponent_self x⟩
#align path_component.nonempty pathComponent.nonempty
theorem mem_pathComponent_of_mem (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : y ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.symm h
#align mem_path_component_of_mem mem_pathComponent_of_mem
theorem pathComponent_symm : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ y ∈ pathComponent x :=
⟨fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h, fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h⟩
#align path_component_symm pathComponent_symm
theorem pathComponent_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : pathComponent x = pathComponent y := by
ext z
constructor
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm]
exact (h.trans h').symm
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm] at h' ⊢
exact h'.trans h
#align path_component_congr pathComponent_congr
theorem pathComponent_subset_component (x : X) : pathComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
fun y h =>
(isConnected_range h.somePath.continuous).subset_connectedComponent ⟨0, by simp⟩ ⟨1, by simp⟩
#align path_component_subset_component pathComponent_subset_component
/-- The path component of `x` in `F` is the set of points that can be joined to `x` in `F`. -/
def pathComponentIn (x : X) (F : Set X) :=
{ y | JoinedIn F x y }
#align path_component_in pathComponentIn
@[simp]
theorem pathComponentIn_univ (x : X) : pathComponentIn x univ = pathComponent x := by
simp [pathComponentIn, pathComponent, JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align path_component_in_univ pathComponentIn_univ
theorem Joined.mem_pathComponent (hyz : Joined y z) (hxy : y ∈ pathComponent x) :
z ∈ pathComponent x :=
hxy.trans hyz
#align joined.mem_path_component Joined.mem_pathComponent
/-! ### Path connected sets -/
/-- A set `F` is path connected if it contains a point that can be joined to all other in `F`. -/
def IsPathConnected (F : Set X) : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ {y}, y ∈ F → JoinedIn F x y
#align is_path_connected IsPathConnected
theorem isPathConnected_iff_eq : IsPathConnected F ↔ ∃ x ∈ F, pathComponentIn x F = F := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, x_in, h⟩ <;> use x, x_in
· ext y
exact ⟨fun hy => hy.mem.2, h⟩
· intro y y_in
rwa [← h] at y_in
#align is_path_connected_iff_eq isPathConnected_iff_eq
theorem IsPathConnected.joinedIn (h : IsPathConnected F) :
∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y := fun _x x_in _y y_in =>
let ⟨_b, _b_in, hb⟩ := h
(hb x_in).symm.trans (hb y_in)
#align is_path_connected.joined_in IsPathConnected.joinedIn
theorem isPathConnected_iff :
IsPathConnected F ↔ F.Nonempty ∧ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨let ⟨b, b_in, _hb⟩ := h; ⟨b, b_in⟩, h.joinedIn⟩,
fun ⟨⟨b, b_in⟩, h⟩ => ⟨b, b_in, fun x_in => h _ b_in _ x_in⟩⟩
#align is_path_connected_iff isPathConnected_iff
/-- If `f` is continuous on `F` and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image' (hF : IsPathConnected F)
{f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
rcases hF with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f x_in
rintro _ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(hx y_in).somePath.map' ?_, fun t ↦ ⟨_, (hx y_in).somePath_mem t, rfl⟩⟩
exact hf.mono (range_subset_iff.2 (hx y_in).somePath_mem)
/-- If `f` is continuous and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image (hF : IsPathConnected F) {f : X → Y}
(hf : Continuous f) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := hF.image' hf.continuousOn
#align is_path_connected.image IsPathConnected.image
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a `Inducing`, `f(F)` is path-connected iff `F` is. -/
nonrec theorem Inducing.isPathConnected_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) :
IsPathConnected F ↔ IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
refine ⟨fun hF ↦ hF.image hf.continuous, fun hF ↦ ?_⟩
simp? [isPathConnected_iff] at hF ⊢ says
simp only [isPathConnected_iff, image_nonempty, mem_image, forall_exists_index,
and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂] at hF ⊢
refine ⟨hF.1, fun x hx y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hF.2 x hx y hy with ⟨γ, hγ⟩
choose γ' hγ' hγγ' using hγ
have key₁ : Inseparable x (γ' 0) := by rw [← hf.inseparable_iff, hγγ' 0, γ.source]
have key₂ : Inseparable (γ' 1) y := by rw [← hf.inseparable_iff, hγγ' 1, γ.target]
refine key₁.joinedIn hx (hγ' 0) |>.trans ⟨⟨⟨γ', ?_⟩, rfl, rfl⟩, hγ'⟩ |>.trans
(key₂.joinedIn (hγ' 1) hy)
simpa [hf.continuous_iff] using γ.continuous.congr fun t ↦ (hγγ' t).symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_image {s : Set X} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h '' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s :=
h.inducing.isPathConnected_iff.symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h⁻¹(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s := by
rw [← Homeomorph.image_symm]; exact h.symm.isPathConnected_image
theorem IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
y ∈ pathComponent x :=
(h.joinedIn x x_in y y_in).joined
#align is_path_connected.mem_path_component IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) :
F ⊆ pathComponent x := fun _y y_in => h.mem_pathComponent x_in y_in
#align is_path_connected.subset_path_component IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent
theorem isPathConnected_singleton (x : X) : IsPathConnected ({x} : Set X) := by
refine ⟨x, rfl, ?_⟩
rintro y rfl
exact JoinedIn.refl rfl
theorem IsPathConnected.union {U V : Set X} (hU : IsPathConnected U) (hV : IsPathConnected V)
(hUV : (U ∩ V).Nonempty) : IsPathConnected (U ∪ V) := by
rcases hUV with ⟨x, xU, xV⟩
use x, Or.inl xU
rintro y (yU | yV)
· exact (hU.joinedIn x xU y yU).mono subset_union_left
· exact (hV.joinedIn x xV y yV).mono subset_union_right
#align is_path_connected.union IsPathConnected.union
/-- If a set `W` is path-connected, then it is also path-connected when seen as a set in a smaller
ambient type `U` (when `U` contains `W`). -/
theorem IsPathConnected.preimage_coe {U W : Set X} (hW : IsPathConnected W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) :
IsPathConnected (((↑) : U → X) ⁻¹' W) := by
rcases hW with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use ⟨x, hWU x_in⟩, by simp [x_in]
rintro ⟨y, hyU⟩ hyW
exact ⟨(hx hyW).joined_subtype.somePath.map (continuous_inclusion hWU), by simp⟩
#align is_path_connected.preimage_coe IsPathConnected.preimage_coe
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), range γ ⊆ s ∧ ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
let p' : ℕ → X := fun k => if h : k < n + 1 then p ⟨k, h⟩ else p ⟨0, n.zero_lt_succ⟩
obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ : ∃ γ : Path (p' 0) (p' n), (∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ range γ) ∧ range γ ⊆ s := by
have hp' : ∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ s := by
intro i hi
simp [p', Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi, hp]
clear_value p'
clear hp p
induction' n with n hn
· use Path.refl (p' 0)
constructor
· rintro i hi
rw [Nat.le_zero.mp hi]
exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· rw [range_subset_iff]
rintro _x
exact hp' 0 le_rfl
· rcases hn fun i hi => hp' i <| Nat.le_succ_of_le hi with ⟨γ₀, hγ₀⟩
rcases h.joinedIn (p' n) (hp' n n.le_succ) (p' <| n + 1) (hp' (n + 1) <| le_rfl) with
⟨γ₁, hγ₁⟩
let γ : Path (p' 0) (p' <| n + 1) := γ₀.trans γ₁
use γ
have range_eq : range γ = range γ₀ ∪ range γ₁ := γ₀.trans_range γ₁
constructor
· rintro i hi
by_cases hi' : i ≤ n
· rw [range_eq]
left
exact hγ₀.1 i hi'
· rw [not_le, ← Nat.succ_le_iff] at hi'
have : i = n.succ := le_antisymm hi hi'
rw [this]
use 1
exact γ.target
· rw [range_eq]
apply union_subset hγ₀.2
rw [range_subset_iff]
exact hγ₁
have hpp' : ∀ k < n + 1, p k = p' k := by
intro k hk
simp only [p', hk, dif_pos]
congr
ext
rw [Fin.val_cast_of_lt hk]
use γ.cast (hpp' 0 n.zero_lt_succ) (hpp' n n.lt_succ_self)
simp only [γ.cast_coe]
refine And.intro hγ.2 ?_
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
suffices p ⟨i, hi⟩ = p' i by convert hγ.1 i (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hi)
rw [← hpp' i hi]
suffices i = i % n.succ by congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
#align is_path_connected.exists_path_through_family IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), (∀ t, γ t ∈ s) ∧ ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
rcases h.exists_path_through_family p hp with ⟨γ, hγ⟩
rcases hγ with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simp only [range, mem_setOf_eq] at h₂
rw [range_subset_iff] at h₁
choose! t ht using h₂
exact ⟨γ, t, h₁, ht⟩
#align is_path_connected.exists_path_through_family' IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family'
/-! ### Path connected spaces -/
/-- A topological space is path-connected if it is non-empty and every two points can be
joined by a continuous path. -/
class PathConnectedSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- A path-connected space must be nonempty. -/
nonempty : Nonempty X
/-- Any two points in a path-connected space must be joined by a continuous path. -/
joined : ∀ x y : X, Joined x y
#align path_connected_space PathConnectedSpace
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_zerothHomotopy :
PathConnectedSpace X ↔ Nonempty (ZerothHomotopy X) ∧ Subsingleton (ZerothHomotopy X) := by
letI := pathSetoid X
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mpr h.1, ⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quotient.sound (PathConnectedSpace.joined x y)
· unfold ZerothHomotopy
rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
exact ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mp h, fun x y => Quotient.exact <| Subsingleton.elim ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧⟩
#align path_connected_space_iff_zeroth_homotopy pathConnectedSpace_iff_zerothHomotopy
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
/-- Use path-connectedness to build a path between two points. -/
def somePath (x y : X) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some (joined x y)
#align path_connected_space.some_path PathConnectedSpace.somePath
end PathConnectedSpace
theorem isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace F := by
rw [isPathConnected_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, x_in⟩, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨⟨x, x_in⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, y_in⟩ ⟨z, z_in⟩
have H := h y y_in z z_in
rwa [joinedIn_iff_joined y_in z_in] at H
· rintro ⟨⟨x, x_in⟩, H⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, x_in⟩, fun y y_in z z_in => ?_⟩
rw [joinedIn_iff_joined y_in z_in]
apply H
#align is_path_connected_iff_path_connected_space isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := by
constructor
· intro h
haveI := @PathConnectedSpace.nonempty X _ _
inhabit X
refine ⟨default, mem_univ _, ?_⟩
intros y _hy
simpa using PathConnectedSpace.joined default y
· intro h
have h' := h.joinedIn
cases' h with x h
exact ⟨⟨x⟩, by simpa using h'⟩
#align path_connected_space_iff_univ pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ
theorem isPathConnected_univ [PathConnectedSpace X] : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) :=
pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp inferInstance
theorem isPathConnected_range [PathConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact isPathConnected_univ.image hf
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 1,193 | 1,196 | theorem Function.Surjective.pathConnectedSpace [PathConnectedSpace X]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Surjective f) (hf' : Continuous f) : PathConnectedSpace Y := by |
rw [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, ← hf.range_eq]
exact isPathConnected_range hf'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import category_theory.limits.has_limits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2738d2ca56cbc63be80c3bd48e9ed90ad94e947d"
/-!
# Existence of limits and colimits
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit` we defined `IsLimit c`,
the data showing that a cone `c` is a limit cone.
The two main structures defined in this file are:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
`HasLimit` is a propositional typeclass
(it's important that it is a proposition merely asserting the existence of a limit,
as otherwise we would have non-defeq problems from incompatible instances).
While `HasLimit` only asserts the existence of a limit cone,
we happily use the axiom of choice in mathlib,
so there are convenience functions all depending on `HasLimit F`:
* `limit F : C`, producing some limit object (of course all such are isomorphic)
* `limit.π F j : limit F ⟶ F.obj j`, the morphisms out of the limit,
* `limit.lift F c : c.pt ⟶ limit F`, the universal morphism from any other `c : Cone F`, etc.
Key to using the `HasLimit` interface is that there is an `@[ext]` lemma stating that
to check `f = g`, for `f g : Z ⟶ limit F`, it suffices to check `f ≫ limit.π F j = g ≫ limit.π F j`
for every `j`.
This, combined with `@[simp]` lemmas, makes it possible to prove many easy facts about limits using
automation (e.g. `tidy`).
There are abbreviations `HasLimitsOfShape J C` and `HasLimits C`
asserting the existence of classes of limits.
Later more are introduced, for finite limits, special shapes of limits, etc.
Ideally, many results about limits should be stated first in terms of `IsLimit`,
and then a result in terms of `HasLimit` derived from this.
At this point, however, this is far from uniformly achieved in mathlib ---
often statements are only written in terms of `HasLimit`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
/-- `LimitCone F` contains a cone over `F` together with the information that it is a limit. -/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note(#5171): removed; linter not ported yet
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cone itself -/
cone : Cone F
/-- The proof that is the limit cone -/
isLimit : IsLimit cone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitCone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_cone.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitCone.isLimit
/-- `HasLimit F` represents the mere existence of a limit for `F`. -/
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There is some limit cone for `F` -/
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.mk
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `LimitCone F` from `HasLimit F`. -/
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
#align category_theory.limits.get_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.getLimitCone
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has limits of shape `J` if there exists a limit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from `J` have limits -/
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimitsOfShape
/-- `C` has all limits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has limits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from all small `J` have limits -/
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_size CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimitsOfSize
/-- `C` has all (small) limits if it has limits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets. -/
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits.has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit cone for a functor. -/
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit object of a functor. -/
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
#align category_theory.limits.limit CategoryTheory.Limits.limit
/-- The projection from the limit object to a value of the functor. -/
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
#align category_theory.limits.limit.π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.π
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone_x
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
#align category_theory.limits.limit.w CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.w
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cone provided by `limit.cone F` is a limit cone. -/
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isLimit
/-- The morphism from the cone point of any other cone to the limit object. -/
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.is_limit_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isLimit_lift
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_π
/-- Functoriality of limits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `lim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified limits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap_π
/-- The cone morphism from any cone to the arbitrary choice of limit cone. -/
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism_hom
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.existsUnique
/-- Given any other limit cone for `F`, the chosen `limit F` is isomorphic to the cone point.
-/
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.hom_ext
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_map CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_map
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_cone
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso_hom f
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso_hom
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and an explicit componentwise description of cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso' W
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso' CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso'
theorem limit.lift_extend {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) :
limit.lift F (c.extend f) = f ≫ limit.lift F c := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_extend CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_extend
/-- If a functor `F` has a limit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasLimitOfIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj (limit.cone F)
isLimit := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (limit.isLimit F) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfIso
-- See the construction of limits from products and equalizers
-- for an example usage.
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cones as a functor `F`
which has a limit, then `G` also has a limit. -/
theorem HasLimit.ofConesIso {J K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C)
(G : K ⥤ C) (h : F.cones ≅ G.cones) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, IsLimit.ofNatIso (IsLimit.natIso (limit.isLimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.of_cones_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.ofConesIso
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) w
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ w.hom.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ limit.π F j = limit.π G j ≫ w.inv.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift F t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom =
limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.lift_iso_of_nat_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift G t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv =
limit.lift F ((Cones.postcompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.lift_iso_of_nat_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) e w
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom ≫ limit.π G k =
limit.π F (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ w.inv.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ G.map (e.counit.app k) := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv ≫ limit.π F j =
limit.π G (e.functor.obj j) ≫ w.hom.app j := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π
section Pre
variable (F) [HasLimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the limit of `F` to the limit of `E ⋙ F`.
-/
def limit.pre : limit F ⟶ limit (E ⋙ F) :=
limit.lift (E ⋙ F) ((limit.cone F).whisker E)
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.pre_π (k : K) : limit.pre F E ≫ limit.π (E ⋙ F) k = limit.π F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_π
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_pre (c : Cone F) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.pre F E = limit.lift (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by ext; simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_pre
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K) [HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)]
@[simp]
theorem limit.pre_pre [h : HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] : haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h;
limit.pre F E ≫ limit.pre (E ⋙ F) D = limit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
ext j; erw [assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π]; rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_pre
variable {E F}
/-- -
If we have particular limit cones available for `E ⋙ F` and for `F`,
we obtain a formula for `limit.pre F E`.
-/
theorem limit.pre_eq (s : LimitCone (E ⋙ F)) (t : LimitCone F) :
limit.pre F E = (limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ s.isLimit.lift (t.cone.whisker E) ≫
(limit.isoLimitCone s).inv := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_eq
end Pre
section Post
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
variable (F) [HasLimit F] (G : C ⥤ D) [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
/-- The canonical morphism from `G` applied to the limit of `F` to the limit of `F ⋙ G`.
-/
def limit.post : G.obj (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ G) :=
limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone (limit.cone F))
#align category_theory.limits.limit.post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.post
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.post_π (j : J) : limit.post F G ≫ limit.π (F ⋙ G) j = G.map (limit.π F j) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.post_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.post_π
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_post (c : Cone F) :
G.map (limit.lift F c) ≫ limit.post F G = limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_post
@[simp]
theorem limit.post_post {E : Type u''} [Category.{v''} E] (H : D ⥤ E) [h : HasLimit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H)] :
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ H (limit (F ⋙ G)) ⟶ limit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H) equals
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ (G ⋙ H))
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
H.map (limit.post F G) ≫ limit.post (F ⋙ G) H = limit.post F (G ⋙ H) := by
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp, limit.post_π, limit.post_π]; rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.post_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.post_post
end Post
theorem limit.pre_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] (E : K ⥤ J) (F : J ⥤ C) (G : C ⥤ D)
[HasLimit F] [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)] [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
[h : HasLimit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G)] :-- G (limit F) ⟶ G (limit (E ⋙ F)) ⟶ limit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G) vs
-- G (limit F) ⟶ limit F ⋙ G ⟶ limit (E ⋙ (F ⋙ G)) or
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
G.map (limit.pre F E) ≫ limit.post (E ⋙ F) G = limit.post F G ≫ limit.pre (F ⋙ G) E := by
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.pre_π, assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.post_π]
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_post
open CategoryTheory.Equivalence
instance hasLimitEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F) :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := Cone.whisker e.functor (limit.cone F)
isLimit := IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) e }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_equivalence_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitEquivalenceComp
-- Porting note: testing whether this still needed
-- attribute [local elab_without_expected_type] inv_fun_id_assoc
-- not entirely sure why this is needed
/-- If a `E ⋙ F` has a limit, and `E` is an equivalence, we can construct a limit of `F`.
-/
theorem hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F)] : HasLimit F := by
haveI : HasLimit (e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F) := Limits.hasLimitEquivalenceComp e.symm
apply hasLimitOfIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_equivalence_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp
-- `hasLimitCompEquivalence` and `hasLimitOfCompEquivalence`
-- are proved in `CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Limits.lean`.
section LimFunctor
variable [HasLimitsOfShape J C]
section
/-- `limit F` is functorial in `F`, when `C` has all limits of shape `J`. -/
@[simps]
def lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C where
obj F := limit F
map α := limMap α
map_id F := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
erw [limMap_π, Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
map_comp α β := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
erw [assoc, IsLimit.fac, IsLimit.fac, ← assoc, IsLimit.fac, assoc]; rfl
#align category_theory.limits.lim CategoryTheory.Limits.lim
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_eq_lim_map CategoryTheory.Limits.lim_map
end
variable {G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G)
theorem limit.map_pre [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (E : K ⥤ J) :
lim.map α ≫ limit.pre G E = limit.pre F E ≫ lim.map (whiskerLeft E α) := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit.map_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.map_pre
theorem limit.map_pre' [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (F : J ⥤ C) {E₁ E₂ : K ⥤ J} (α : E₁ ⟶ E₂) :
limit.pre F E₂ = limit.pre F E₁ ≫ lim.map (whiskerRight α F) := by
ext1; simp [← category.assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.limit.map_pre' CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.map_pre'
theorem limit.id_pre (F : J ⥤ C) : limit.pre F (𝟭 _) = lim.map (Functor.leftUnitor F).inv := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.id_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.id_pre
theorem limit.map_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [HasLimitsOfShape J D] (H : C ⥤ D) :
/- H (limit F) ⟶ H (limit G) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) vs
H (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ H) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) -/
H.map (limMap α) ≫ limit.post G H = limit.post F H ≫ limMap (whiskerRight α H) := by
ext
simp only [whiskerRight_app, limMap_π, assoc, limit.post_π_assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.limit.map_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.map_post
/-- The isomorphism between
morphisms from `W` to the cone point of the limit cone for `F`
and cones over `F` with cone point `W`
is natural in `F`.
-/
def limYoneda :
lim ⋙ yoneda ⋙ (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj uliftFunctor.{u₁} ≅ CategoryTheory.cones J C :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun F => NatIso.ofComponents fun W => limit.homIso F (unop W)
#align category_theory.limits.lim_yoneda CategoryTheory.Limits.limYoneda
/-- The constant functor and limit functor are adjoint to each other-/
def constLimAdj : (const J : C ⥤ J ⥤ C) ⊣ lim where
homEquiv c g :=
{ toFun := fun f => limit.lift _ ⟨c, f⟩
invFun := fun f =>
{ app := fun j => f ≫ limit.π _ _ }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat }
unit := { app := fun c => limit.lift _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _⟩ }
counit := { app := fun g => { app := limit.π _ } }
-- This used to be automatic before leanprover/lean4#2644
homEquiv_unit := by
-- Sad that aesop can no longer do this!
intros
dsimp
ext
simp
#align category_theory.limits.const_lim_adj CategoryTheory.Limits.constLimAdj
instance : IsRightAdjoint (lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C) :=
⟨_, ⟨constLimAdj⟩⟩
end LimFunctor
instance limMap_mono' {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimitsOfShape J C] (α : F ⟶ G) [Mono α] : Mono (limMap α) :=
(lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C).map_mono α
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_mono' CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap_mono'
instance limMap_mono {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) [∀ j, Mono (α.app j)] :
Mono (limMap α) :=
⟨fun {Z} u v h =>
limit.hom_ext fun j => (cancel_mono (α.app j)).1 <| by simpa using h =≫ limit.π _ j⟩
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap_mono
section Adjunction
variable {L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C} (adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ L)
/- The fact that the existence of limits of shape `J` is equivalent to the existence
of a right adjoint to the constant functor `C ⥤ (J ⥤ C)` is obtained in
the file `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeCategory`: see the lemma
`hasLimitsOfShape_iff_isLeftAdjoint_const`. In the definitions below, given an
adjunction `adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ (L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C)`, we directly construct
a limit cone for any `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
/-- The limit cone obtained from a right adjoint of the constant functor. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coneOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) : Cone F where
pt := L.obj F
π := adj.counit.app F
/-- The cones defined by `coneOfAdj` are limit cones. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) :
IsLimit (coneOfAdj adj F) where
lift s := adj.homEquiv _ _ s.π
fac s j := by
have eq := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.counit.naturality s.π) j
have eq' := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.left_triangle_components s.pt) j
dsimp at eq eq' ⊢
rw [Adjunction.homEquiv_unit, assoc, eq, reassoc_of% eq']
uniq s m hm := (adj.homEquiv _ _).symm.injective (by ext j; simpa using hm j)
end Adjunction
/-- We can transport limits of shape `J` along an equivalence `J ≌ J'`.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 629 | 633 | theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence {J' : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J'] (e : J ≌ J')
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] : HasLimitsOfShape J' C := by |
constructor
intro F
apply hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp e
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury G. Kudryashov, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
#align_import algebra.monoid_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
/-!
# Monoid algebras
When the domain of a `Finsupp` has a multiplicative or additive structure, we can define
a convolution product. To mathematicians this structure is known as the "monoid algebra",
i.e. the finite formal linear combinations over a given semiring of elements of the monoid.
The "group ring" ℤ[G] or the "group algebra" k[G] are typical uses.
In fact the construction of the "monoid algebra" makes sense when `G` is not even a monoid, but
merely a magma, i.e., when `G` carries a multiplication which is not required to satisfy any
conditions at all. In this case the construction yields a not-necessarily-unital,
not-necessarily-associative algebra but it is still adjoint to the forgetful functor from such
algebras to magmas, and we prove this as `MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma`.
In this file we define `MonoidAlgebra k G := G →₀ k`, and `AddMonoidAlgebra k G`
in the same way, and then define the convolution product on these.
When the domain is additive, this is used to define polynomials:
```
Polynomial R := AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
MvPolynomial σ α := AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
```
When the domain is multiplicative, e.g. a group, this will be used to define the group ring.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `R[A]` for `AddMonoidAlgebra R A`.
## Implementation note
Unfortunately because additive and multiplicative structures both appear in both cases,
it doesn't appear to be possible to make much use of `to_additive`, and we just settle for
saying everything twice.
Similarly, I attempted to just define
`k[G] := MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G)`, but the definitional equality
`Multiplicative G = G` leaks through everywhere, and seems impossible to use.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
section
variable [Semiring k]
/-- The monoid algebra over a semiring `k` generated by the monoid `G`.
It is the type of finite formal `k`-linear combinations of terms of `G`,
endowed with the convolution product.
-/
def MonoidAlgebra : Type max u₁ u₂ :=
G →₀ k
#align monoid_algebra MonoidAlgebra
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance MonoidAlgebra.inhabited : Inhabited (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (G →₀ k))
#align monoid_algebra.inhabited MonoidAlgebra.inhabited
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance MonoidAlgebra.addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (G →₀ k))
#align monoid_algebra.add_comm_monoid MonoidAlgebra.addCommMonoid
instance MonoidAlgebra.instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd k] : IsCancelAdd (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsCancelAdd (G →₀ k))
instance MonoidAlgebra.coeFun : CoeFun (MonoidAlgebra k G) fun _ => G → k :=
Finsupp.instCoeFun
#align monoid_algebra.has_coe_to_fun MonoidAlgebra.coeFun
end
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
section
variable [Semiring k] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`, so we replace some definitions and theorems with
-- new ones which have new types.
abbrev single (a : G) (b : k) : MonoidAlgebra k G := Finsupp.single a b
theorem single_zero (a : G) : (single a 0 : MonoidAlgebra k G) = 0 := Finsupp.single_zero a
theorem single_add (a : G) (b₁ b₂ : k) : single a (b₁ + b₂) = single a b₁ + single a b₂ :=
Finsupp.single_add a b₁ b₂
@[simp]
theorem sum_single_index {N} [AddCommMonoid N] {a : G} {b : k} {h : G → k → N}
(h_zero : h a 0 = 0) :
(single a b).sum h = h a b := Finsupp.sum_single_index h_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_single (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) : f.sum single = f :=
Finsupp.sum_single f
theorem single_apply {a a' : G} {b : k} [Decidable (a = a')] :
single a b a' = if a = a' then b else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero {a : G} {b : k} : single a b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := Finsupp.single_eq_zero
abbrev mapDomain {G' : Type*} (f : G → G') (v : MonoidAlgebra k G) : MonoidAlgebra k G' :=
Finsupp.mapDomain f v
theorem mapDomain_sum {k' G' : Type*} [Semiring k'] {f : G → G'} {s : MonoidAlgebra k' G}
{v : G → k' → MonoidAlgebra k G} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
Finsupp.mapDomain_sum
/-- A non-commutative version of `MonoidAlgebra.lift`: given an additive homomorphism `f : k →+ R`
and a homomorphism `g : G → R`, returns the additive homomorphism from
`MonoidAlgebra k G` such that `liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g a`. If `f` is a ring homomorphism
and the range of either `f` or `g` is in center of `R`, then the result is a ring homomorphism. If
`R` is a `k`-algebra and `f = algebraMap k R`, then the result is an algebra homomorphism called
`MonoidAlgebra.lift`. -/
def liftNC (f : k →+ R) (g : G → R) : MonoidAlgebra k G →+ R :=
liftAddHom fun x : G => (AddMonoidHom.mulRight (g x)).comp f
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc MonoidAlgebra.liftNC
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_single (f : k →+ R) (g : G → R) (a : G) (b : k) :
liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g a :=
liftAddHom_apply_single _ _ _
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_single MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_single
end
section Mul
variable [Semiring k] [Mul G]
/-- The multiplication in a monoid algebra. We make it irreducible so that Lean doesn't unfold
it trying to unify two things that are different. -/
@[irreducible] def mul' (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) : MonoidAlgebra k G :=
f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
/-- The product of `f g : MonoidAlgebra k G` is the finitely supported function
whose value at `a` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all pairs `x, y`
such that `x * y = a`. (Think of the group ring of a group.) -/
instance instMul : Mul (MonoidAlgebra k G) := ⟨MonoidAlgebra.mul'⟩
#align monoid_algebra.has_mul MonoidAlgebra.instMul
theorem mul_def {f g : MonoidAlgebra k G} :
f * g = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
#align monoid_algebra.mul_def MonoidAlgebra.mul_def
instance nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ Finsupp.instAddCommMonoid with
-- Porting note: `refine` & `exact` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
left_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_add_index ?_ ?_)) ?_ <;>
simp only [mul_add, mul_zero, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_add]
right_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (sum_add_index ?_ ?_) ?_ <;>
simp only [add_mul, zero_mul, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_zero, sum_add]
zero_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact sum_zero_index
mul_zero := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_zero_index)) sum_zero }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem liftNC_mul {g_hom : Type*} [FunLike g_hom G R] [MulHomClass g_hom G R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) (a b : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(h_comm : ∀ {x y}, y ∈ a.support → Commute (f (b x)) (g y)) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g (a * b) = liftNC (f : k →+ R) g a * liftNC (f : k →+ R) g b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← sum_single a, ← sum_single b]
-- Porting note: `(liftNC _ g).map_finsupp_sum` → `map_finsupp_sum`
simp_rw [mul_def, map_finsupp_sum, liftNC_single, Finsupp.sum_mul, Finsupp.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun y hy => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _hx => ?_
simp [mul_assoc, (h_comm hy).left_comm]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_mul MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_mul
end Mul
section Semigroup
variable [Semiring k] [Semigroup G] [Semiring R]
instance nonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
mul_assoc := fun f g h => by
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp only [mul_def]
rw [sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₁ b₁
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₂ b₂
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_single_index]; congr; ext a₃ b₃
rw [sum_single_index, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
all_goals simp only [single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, add_mul,
mul_add, zero_mul, mul_zero, sum_zero, sum_add] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring
end Semigroup
section One
variable [NonAssocSemiring R] [Semiring k] [One G]
/-- The unit of the multiplication is `single 1 1`, i.e. the function
that is `1` at `1` and zero elsewhere. -/
instance one : One (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨single 1 1⟩
#align monoid_algebra.has_one MonoidAlgebra.one
theorem one_def : (1 : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single 1 1 :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.one_def MonoidAlgebra.one_def
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_one {g_hom : Type*} [FunLike g_hom G R] [OneHomClass g_hom G R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g 1 = 1 := by simp [one_def]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_one MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_one
end One
section MulOneClass
variable [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G]
instance nonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
natCast := fun n => single 1 n
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ := fun _ => by simp; rfl
one_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, zero_mul, single_zero, sum_zero, zero_add,
one_mul, sum_single]
mul_one := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, mul_zero, single_zero, sum_zero, add_zero,
mul_one, sum_single] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_assoc_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring
theorem natCast_def (n : ℕ) : (n : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single (1 : G) (n : k) :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.nat_cast_def MonoidAlgebra.natCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_def := natCast_def
end MulOneClass
/-! #### Semiring structure -/
section Semiring
variable [Semiring k] [Monoid G]
instance semiring : Semiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring,
MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.semiring MonoidAlgebra.semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `liftNC` as a `RingHom`, for when `f x` and `g y` commute -/
def liftNCRingHom (f : k →+* R) (g : G →* R) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra k G →+* R :=
{ liftNC (f : k →+ R) g with
map_one' := liftNC_one _ _
map_mul' := fun _a _b => liftNC_mul _ _ _ _ fun {_ _} _ => h_comm _ _ }
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_ring_hom MonoidAlgebra.liftNCRingHom
end Semiring
instance nonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring k] [CommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
simp only [mul_def, Finsupp.sum, mul_comm]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
simp only [mul_comm] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring
instance nontrivial [Semiring k] [Nontrivial k] [Nonempty G] : Nontrivial (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.instNontrivial
#align monoid_algebra.nontrivial MonoidAlgebra.nontrivial
/-! #### Derived instances -/
section DerivedInstances
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring k] [CommMonoid G] : CommSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, MonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.comm_semiring MonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance unique [Semiring k] [Subsingleton k] : Unique (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.uniqueOfRight
#align monoid_algebra.unique MonoidAlgebra.unique
instance addCommGroup [Ring k] : AddCommGroup (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.instAddCommGroup
#align monoid_algebra.add_comm_group MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup
instance nonUnitalNonAssocRing [Ring k] [Mul G] : NonUnitalNonAssocRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocRing
instance nonUnitalRing [Ring k] [Semigroup G] : NonUnitalRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing
instance nonAssocRing [Ring k] [MulOneClass G] : NonAssocRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup,
MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with
intCast := fun z => single 1 (z : k)
-- Porting note: Both were `simpa`.
intCast_ofNat := fun n => by simp; rfl
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by simp; rfl }
#align monoid_algebra.non_assoc_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing
theorem intCast_def [Ring k] [MulOneClass G] (z : ℤ) :
(z : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single (1 : G) (z : k) :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.int_cast_def MonoidAlgebra.intCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_def := intCast_def
instance ring [Ring k] [Monoid G] : Ring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing, MonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.ring MonoidAlgebra.ring
instance nonUnitalCommRing [CommRing k] [CommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing
instance commRing [CommRing k] [CommMonoid G] : CommRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing, MonoidAlgebra.ring with }
#align monoid_algebra.comm_ring MonoidAlgebra.commRing
variable {S : Type*}
instance smulZeroClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] : SMulZeroClass R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.smulZeroClass
#align monoid_algebra.smul_zero_class MonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance distribSMul [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] : DistribSMul R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.distribSMul _ _
#align monoid_algebra.distrib_smul MonoidAlgebra.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction [Monoid R] [Semiring k] [DistribMulAction R k] :
DistribMulAction R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.distribMulAction G k
#align monoid_algebra.distrib_mul_action MonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance module [Semiring R] [Semiring k] [Module R k] : Module R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.module G k
#align monoid_algebra.module MonoidAlgebra.module
instance faithfulSMul [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [FaithfulSMul R k] [Nonempty G] :
FaithfulSMul R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.faithfulSMul
#align monoid_algebra.has_faithful_smul MonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance isScalarTower [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S k] : IsScalarTower R S (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.isScalarTower G k
#align monoid_algebra.is_scalar_tower MonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMulCommClass R S k] :
SMulCommClass R S (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.smulCommClass G k
#align monoid_algebra.smul_comm_tower MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ k]
[IsCentralScalar R k] : IsCentralScalar R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.isCentralScalar G k
#align monoid_algebra.is_central_scalar MonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
/-- This is not an instance as it conflicts with `MonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction` when `G = kˣ`.
-/
def comapDistribMulActionSelf [Group G] [Semiring k] : DistribMulAction G (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.comapDistribMulAction
#align monoid_algebra.comap_distrib_mul_action_self MonoidAlgebra.comapDistribMulActionSelf
end DerivedInstances
section MiscTheorems
variable [Semiring k]
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
theorem mul_apply [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) :
(f * g) x = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => if a₁ * a₂ = x then b₁ * b₂ else 0 := by
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
rw [mul_def, Finsupp.sum_apply]; congr; ext
rw [Finsupp.sum_apply]; congr; ext
apply single_apply
#align monoid_algebra.mul_apply MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 435 | 455 | theorem mul_apply_antidiagonal [Mul G] (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) (s : Finset (G × G))
(hs : ∀ {p : G × G}, p ∈ s ↔ p.1 * p.2 = x) : (f * g) x = ∑ p ∈ s, f p.1 * g p.2 := by |
classical exact
let F : G × G → k := fun p => if p.1 * p.2 = x then f p.1 * g p.2 else 0
calc
(f * g) x = ∑ a₁ ∈ f.support, ∑ a₂ ∈ g.support, F (a₁, a₂) := mul_apply f g x
_ = ∑ p ∈ f.support ×ˢ g.support, F p := Finset.sum_product.symm
_ = ∑ p ∈ (f.support ×ˢ g.support).filter fun p : G × G => p.1 * p.2 = x, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
(Finset.sum_filter _ _).symm
_ = ∑ p ∈ s.filter fun p : G × G => p.1 ∈ f.support ∧ p.2 ∈ g.support, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
(sum_congr
(by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_product, hs, and_comm])
fun _ _ => rfl)
_ = ∑ p ∈ s, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun p hps hp => by
simp only [mem_filter, mem_support_iff, not_and, Classical.not_not] at hp ⊢
by_cases h1 : f p.1 = 0
· rw [h1, zero_mul]
· rw [hp hps h1, mul_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury G. Kudryashov, Dylan MacKenzie, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.ModEq
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
#align_import analysis.specific_limits.normed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file contains important specific limit computations in (semi-)normed groups/rings/spaces, as
well as such computations in `ℝ` when the natural proof passes through a fact about normed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Asymptotics
open scoped Classical
open Topology Nat uniformity NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop : Tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop
#align tendsto_norm_at_top_at_top tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop
theorem summable_of_absolute_convergence_real {f : ℕ → ℝ} :
(∃ r, Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, |f i|) atTop (𝓝 r)) → Summable f
| ⟨r, hr⟩ => by
refine .of_norm ⟨r, (hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg ?_ _).2 ?_⟩
· exact fun i ↦ norm_nonneg _
· simpa only using hr
#align summable_of_absolute_convergence_real summable_of_absolute_convergence_real
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem tendsto_norm_zero' {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] :
Tendsto (norm : 𝕜 → ℝ) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_norm_zero.inf <| tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun _ hx ↦ norm_pos_iff.2 hx
#align tendsto_norm_zero' tendsto_norm_zero'
namespace NormedField
theorem tendsto_norm_inverse_nhdsWithin_0_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] :
Tendsto (fun x : 𝕜 ↦ ‖x⁻¹‖) (𝓝[≠] 0) atTop :=
(tendsto_inv_zero_atTop.comp tendsto_norm_zero').congr fun x ↦ (norm_inv x).symm
#align normed_field.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhds_within_0_at_top NormedField.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhdsWithin_0_atTop
theorem tendsto_norm_zpow_nhdsWithin_0_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] {m : ℤ}
(hm : m < 0) :
Tendsto (fun x : 𝕜 ↦ ‖x ^ m‖) (𝓝[≠] 0) atTop := by
rcases neg_surjective m with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rw [neg_lt_zero] at hm; lift m to ℕ using hm.le; rw [Int.natCast_pos] at hm
simp only [norm_pow, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, ← inv_pow]
exact (tendsto_pow_atTop hm.ne').comp NormedField.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhdsWithin_0_atTop
#align normed_field.tendsto_norm_zpow_nhds_within_0_at_top NormedField.tendsto_norm_zpow_nhdsWithin_0_atTop
/-- The (scalar) product of a sequence that tends to zero with a bounded one also tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_smul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded {ι 𝕜 𝔸 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[NormedAddCommGroup 𝔸] [Module 𝕜 𝔸] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 𝔸] {l : Filter ι} {ε : ι → 𝕜} {f : ι → 𝔸}
(hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝 0)) (hf : Filter.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f)) :
Tendsto (ε • f) l (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← isLittleO_one_iff 𝕜] at hε ⊢
simpa using IsLittleO.smul_isBigO hε (hf.isBigO_const (one_ne_zero : (1 : 𝕜) ≠ 0))
#align normed_field.tendsto_zero_smul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded NormedField.tendsto_zero_smul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_zpow {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {m : ℤ} {x : 𝕜} :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ x ^ m) x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ m := by
refine ⟨?_, continuousAt_zpow₀ _ _⟩
contrapose!; rintro ⟨rfl, hm⟩ hc
exact not_tendsto_atTop_of_tendsto_nhds (hc.tendsto.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds).norm
(tendsto_norm_zpow_nhdsWithin_0_atTop hm)
#align normed_field.continuous_at_zpow NormedField.continuousAt_zpow
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_inv {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {x : 𝕜} :
ContinuousAt Inv.inv x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [(zero_lt_one' ℤ).not_le] using @continuousAt_zpow _ _ (-1) x
#align normed_field.continuous_at_inv NormedField.continuousAt_inv
end NormedField
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ < r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
have H : 0 < r₂ := h₁.trans_lt h₂
(isLittleO_of_tendsto fun _ hn ↦ False.elim <| H.ne' <| pow_eq_zero hn) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one
(div_nonneg h₁ (h₁.trans h₂.le)) ((div_lt_one H).2 h₂)).congr fun _ ↦ div_pow _ _ _
#align is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left
theorem isBigO_pow_pow_of_le_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
h₂.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h ↦ h ▸ isBigO_refl _ _) fun h ↦ (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h).isBigO
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_O_pow_pow_of_le_left isBigO_pow_pow_of_le_left
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : |r₁| < |r₂|) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
refine (IsLittleO.of_norm_left ?_).of_norm_right
exact (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (abs_nonneg r₁) h).congr (pow_abs r₁) (pow_abs r₂)
#align is_o_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left
open List in
/-- Various statements equivalent to the fact that `f n` grows exponentially slower than `R ^ n`.
* 0: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 1: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 2: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 3: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 4: there exist `a < R` and `C` such that one of `C` and `R` is positive and $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$
for all `n`;
* 5: there exists `0 < a < R` and a positive `C` such that $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$ for all `n`;
* 6: there exists `a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`;
* 7: there exists `0 < a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`.
NB: For backwards compatibility, if you add more items to the list, please append them at the end of
the list. -/
theorem TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (f : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℝ) :
TFAE
[∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a < R, ∃ C : ℝ, (0 < C ∨ 0 < R) ∧ ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n, ∃ a < R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n] := by
have A : Ico 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨(neg_lt_zero.2 (hx.1.trans_lt hx.2)).trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩
have B : Ioo 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self A
-- First we prove that 1-4 are equivalent using 2 → 3 → 4, 1 → 3, and 2 → 1
tfae_have 1 → 3
· exact fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1
· exact fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
tfae_have 3 → 2
· rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩
rcases exists_between (abs_lt.2 ha) with ⟨b, hab, hbR⟩
exact ⟨b, ⟨(abs_nonneg a).trans_lt hab, hbR⟩,
H.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left (hab.trans_le (le_abs_self b)))⟩
tfae_have 2 → 4
· exact fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 4 → 3
· exact fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
-- Add 5 and 6 using 4 → 6 → 5 → 3
tfae_have 4 → 6
· rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩
rcases bound_of_isBigO_nat_atTop H with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC₀, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg ha.1.le] using hC (pow_ne_zero n ha.1.ne')
tfae_have 6 → 5
· exact fun ⟨a, ha, C, H₀, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, C, Or.inl H₀, H⟩
tfae_have 5 → 3
· rintro ⟨a, ha, C, h₀, H⟩
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans (H n) with (rfl | ⟨hC₀, ha₀⟩)
· obtain rfl : f = 0 := by
ext n
simpa using H n
simp only [lt_irrefl, false_or_iff] at h₀
exact ⟨0, ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 h₀, h₀⟩, isBigO_zero _ _⟩
exact ⟨a, A ⟨ha₀, ha⟩,
isBigO_of_le' _ fun n ↦ (H n).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_abs_self _) hC₀.le⟩
-- Add 7 and 8 using 2 → 8 → 7 → 3
tfae_have 2 → 8
· rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩
refine ⟨a, ha, (H.def zero_lt_one).mono fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_pos ha.1] at hn
tfae_have 8 → 7
· exact fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, H⟩
tfae_have 7 → 3
· rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩
have : 0 ≤ a := nonneg_of_eventually_pow_nonneg (H.mono fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans)
refine ⟨a, A ⟨this, ha⟩, IsBigO.of_bound 1 ?_⟩
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg this]
-- Porting note: used to work without explicitly having 6 → 7
tfae_have 6 → 7
· exact fun h ↦ tfae_8_to_7 <| tfae_2_to_8 <| tfae_3_to_2 <| tfae_5_to_3 <| tfae_6_to_5 h
tfae_finish
#align tfae_exists_lt_is_o_pow TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow
/-- For any natural `k` and a real `r > 1` we have `n ^ k = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 1 < r) : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
have : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ ↦ x ^ k) (𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
((continuous_id.pow k).tendsto' (1 : ℝ) 1 (one_pow _)).mono_left inf_le_left
obtain ⟨r' : ℝ, hr' : r' ^ k < r, h1 : 1 < r'⟩ :=
((this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hr)).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have h0 : 0 ≤ r' := zero_le_one.trans h1.le
suffices (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =O[atTop] fun n : ℕ ↦ (r' ^ k) ^ n from
this.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (pow_nonneg h0 _) hr')
conv in (r' ^ _) ^ _ => rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul]
suffices ∀ n : ℕ, ‖(n : R)‖ ≤ (r' - 1)⁻¹ * ‖(1 : R)‖ * ‖r' ^ n‖ from
(isBigO_of_le' _ this).pow _
intro n
rw [mul_right_comm]
refine n.norm_cast_le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _))
simpa [_root_.div_eq_inv_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h0] using n.cast_le_pow_div_sub h1
#align is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt
/-- For a real `r > 1` we have `n = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
((↑) : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt R _ 1 _ hr
#align is_o_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt isLittleO_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt
/-- If `‖r₁‖ < r₂`, then for any natural `k` we have `n ^ k r₁ ^ n = o (r₂ ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ)
{r₁ : R} {r₂ : ℝ} (h : ‖r₁‖ < r₂) :
(fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k * r₁ ^ n : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
by_cases h0 : r₁ = 0
· refine (isLittleO_zero _ _).congr' (mem_atTop_sets.2 <| ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩) EventuallyEq.rfl
simp [zero_pow (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 hn), h0]
rw [← Ne, ← norm_pos_iff] at h0
have A : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ (r₂ / ‖r₁‖) ^ n :=
isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k ((one_lt_div h0).2 h)
suffices (fun n ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ ‖r₁‖ ^ n by
simpa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (pow_pos h0 _).ne'] using A.mul_isBigO this
exact IsBigO.of_bound 1 (by simpa using eventually_norm_pow_le r₁)
#align is_o_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt
theorem tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k / r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr).tendsto_div_nhds_zero
#align tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases h0 : r = 0
· exact tendsto_const_nhds.congr'
(mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ by simp [zero_lt_one.trans_le hn |>.ne', h0]⟩)
have hr' : 1 < |r|⁻¹ := one_lt_inv (abs_pos.2 h0) hr
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr'
#align tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`.
This is a specialized version of `tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out
for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one k (abs_lt.2 ⟨neg_one_lt_zero.trans_le hr, h'r⟩)
#align tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one 1 hr
#align tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. This is a specialized version of
`tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one 1 hr h'r
#align tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one
/-- In a normed ring, the powers of an element x with `‖x‖ < 1` tend to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] {x : R}
(h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
apply squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_norm_pow_le x)
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) h
#align tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 := tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h
#align tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_abs_lt_1 tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_abs_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_0_of_abs_lt_1 := tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_abs_lt_one
/-! ### Geometric series-/
section Geometric
variable {K : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing K] {ξ : K}
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (h : ‖ξ‖ < 1) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ ξ ^ n) (1 - ξ)⁻¹ := by
have xi_ne_one : ξ ≠ 1 := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
have A : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (ξ ^ n - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹)) :=
((tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds
rw [hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm]
· simpa [geom_sum_eq, xi_ne_one, neg_inv, div_eq_mul_inv] using A
· simp [norm_pow, summable_geometric_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) h]
#align has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 := hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
theorem summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (h : ‖ξ‖ < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ξ ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h⟩
#align summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 := summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
theorem tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (h : ‖ξ‖ < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, ξ ^ n = (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
(hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).tsum_eq
#align tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 := tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
#align has_sum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 hasSum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias hasSum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 := hasSum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one
theorem summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
#align summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 := summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_one
theorem tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
#align tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 := tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one
/-- A geometric series in a normed field is summable iff the norm of the common ratio is less than
one. -/
@[simp]
theorem summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one : (Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ξ ^ n) ↔ ‖ξ‖ < 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one⟩
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : dist (ξ ^ k) 0 < 1⟩ :=
(h.tendsto_cofinite_zero.eventually (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)).exists
simp only [norm_pow, dist_zero_right] at hk
rw [← one_pow k] at hk
exact lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left _ zero_le_one hk
#align summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_1 summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_1 := summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one
end Geometric
section MulGeometric
theorem summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ) {r : R}
(hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖((n : R) ^ k * r ^ n : R)‖ := by
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hrr', h⟩
exact summable_of_isBigO_nat (summable_geometric_of_lt_one ((norm_nonneg _).trans hrr'.le) h)
(isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt _ hrr').isBigO.norm_left
#align summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 := summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
theorem summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] [CompleteSpace R]
(k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : Summable (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → R) :=
.of_norm <| summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one _ hr
#align summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 := summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
/-- If `‖r‖ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`, `HasSum` version. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Normed.lean | 381 | 405 | theorem hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
{r : 𝕜} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : HasSum (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → 𝕜) (r / (1 - r) ^ 2) := by |
have A : Summable (fun n ↦ (n : 𝕜) * r ^ n : ℕ → 𝕜) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one 1 hr
have B : HasSum (r ^ · : ℕ → 𝕜) (1 - r)⁻¹ := hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one hr
refine A.hasSum_iff.2 ?_
have hr' : r ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
simp [lt_irrefl] at hr
set s : 𝕜 := ∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n
have : Commute (1 - r) s :=
.tsum_right _ fun _ =>
.sub_left (.one_left _) (.mul_right (Nat.commute_cast _ _) (.pow_right (.refl _) _))
calc
s = s * (1 - r) / (1 - r) := (mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (sub_ne_zero.2 hr'.symm)).symm
_ = (1 - r) * s / (1 - r) := by rw [this.eq]
_ = (s - r * s) / (1 - r) := by rw [_root_.sub_mul, one_mul]
_ = (((0 : ℕ) * r ^ 0 + ∑' n : ℕ, (n + 1 : ℕ) * r ^ (n + 1)) - r * s) / (1 - r) := by
rw [← tsum_eq_zero_add A]
_ = ((r * ∑' n : ℕ, ↑(n + 1) * r ^ n) - r * s) / (1 - r) := by
simp only [cast_zero, pow_zero, mul_one, _root_.pow_succ', (Nat.cast_commute _ r).left_comm,
_root_.tsum_mul_left, zero_add]
_ = r / (1 - r) ^ 2 := by
simp [add_mul, tsum_add A B.summable, mul_add, B.tsum_eq, ← div_eq_mul_inv, sq,
div_mul_eq_div_div_swap]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Basic
#align_import probability.probability_mass_function.monad from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4ac69b290818724c159de091daa3acd31da0ee6d"
/-!
# Monad Operations for Probability Mass Functions
This file constructs two operations on `PMF` that give it a monad structure.
`pure a` is the distribution where a single value `a` has probability `1`.
`bind pa pb : PMF β` is the distribution given by sampling `a : α` from `pa : PMF α`,
and then sampling from `pb a : PMF β` to get a final result `b : β`.
`bindOnSupport` generalizes `bind` to allow binding to a partial function,
so that the second argument only needs to be defined on the support of the first argument.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open scoped Classical
open NNReal ENNReal
open MeasureTheory
namespace PMF
section Pure
/-- The pure `PMF` is the `PMF` where all the mass lies in one point.
The value of `pure a` is `1` at `a` and `0` elsewhere. -/
def pure (a : α) : PMF α :=
⟨fun a' => if a' = a then 1 else 0, hasSum_ite_eq _ _⟩
#align pmf.pure PMF.pure
variable (a a' : α)
@[simp]
theorem pure_apply : pure a a' = if a' = a then 1 else 0 := rfl
#align pmf.pure_apply PMF.pure_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_pure : (pure a).support = {a} :=
Set.ext fun a' => by simp [mem_support_iff]
#align pmf.support_pure PMF.support_pure
theorem mem_support_pure_iff : a' ∈ (pure a).support ↔ a' = a := by simp
#align pmf.mem_support_pure_iff PMF.mem_support_pure_iff
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem pure_apply_self : pure a a = 1 :=
if_pos rfl
#align pmf.pure_apply_self PMF.pure_apply_self
theorem pure_apply_of_ne (h : a' ≠ a) : pure a a' = 0 :=
if_neg h
#align pmf.pure_apply_of_ne PMF.pure_apply_of_ne
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (PMF α) :=
⟨pure default⟩
section Measure
variable (s : Set α)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_pure_apply : (pure a).toOuterMeasure s = if a ∈ s then 1 else 0 := by
refine (toOuterMeasure_apply (pure a) s).trans ?_
split_ifs with ha
· refine (tsum_congr fun b => ?_).trans (tsum_ite_eq a 1)
exact ite_eq_left_iff.2 fun hb => symm (ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h => (hb <| h.symm ▸ ha).elim)
· refine (tsum_congr fun b => ?_).trans tsum_zero
exact ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun hb => ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h => (ha <| h ▸ hb).elim
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_pure_apply PMF.toOuterMeasure_pure_apply
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- The measure of a set under `pure a` is `1` for sets containing `a` and `0` otherwise. -/
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_pure_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(pure a).toMeasure s = if a ∈ s then 1 else 0 :=
(toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply (pure a) s hs).trans (toOuterMeasure_pure_apply a s)
#align pmf.to_measure_pure_apply PMF.toMeasure_pure_apply
theorem toMeasure_pure : (pure a).toMeasure = Measure.dirac a :=
Measure.ext fun s hs => by rw [toMeasure_pure_apply a s hs, Measure.dirac_apply' a hs]; rfl
#align pmf.to_measure_pure PMF.toMeasure_pure
@[simp]
theorem toPMF_dirac [Countable α] [h : MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
(Measure.dirac a).toPMF = pure a := by
rw [toPMF_eq_iff_toMeasure_eq, toMeasure_pure]
#align pmf.to_pmf_dirac PMF.toPMF_dirac
end Measure
end Pure
section Bind
/-- The monadic bind operation for `PMF`. -/
def bind (p : PMF α) (f : α → PMF β) : PMF β :=
⟨fun b => ∑' a, p a * f a b,
ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.2
(ENNReal.tsum_comm.trans <| by simp only [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, tsum_coe, mul_one])⟩
#align pmf.bind PMF.bind
variable (p : PMF α) (f : α → PMF β) (g : β → PMF γ)
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (b : β) : p.bind f b = ∑' a, p a * f a b := rfl
#align pmf.bind_apply PMF.bind_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_bind : (p.bind f).support = ⋃ a ∈ p.support, (f a).support :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [mem_support_iff, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, not_or]
#align pmf.support_bind PMF.support_bind
theorem mem_support_bind_iff (b : β) :
b ∈ (p.bind f).support ↔ ∃ a ∈ p.support, b ∈ (f a).support := by
simp only [support_bind, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
#align pmf.mem_support_bind_iff PMF.mem_support_bind_iff
@[simp]
theorem pure_bind (a : α) (f : α → PMF β) : (pure a).bind f = f a := by
have : ∀ b a', ite (a' = a) (f a' b) 0 = ite (a' = a) (f a b) 0 := fun b a' => by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
ext b
simp [this]
#align pmf.pure_bind PMF.pure_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure : p.bind pure = p :=
PMF.ext fun x => (bind_apply _ _ _).trans (_root_.trans
(tsum_eq_single x fun y hy => by rw [pure_apply_of_ne _ _ hy.symm, mul_zero]) <|
by rw [pure_apply_self, mul_one])
#align pmf.bind_pure PMF.bind_pure
@[simp]
theorem bind_const (p : PMF α) (q : PMF β) : (p.bind fun _ => q) = q :=
PMF.ext fun x => by rw [bind_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_right, tsum_coe, one_mul]
#align pmf.bind_const PMF.bind_const
@[simp]
theorem bind_bind : (p.bind f).bind g = p.bind fun a => (f a).bind g :=
PMF.ext fun b => by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_inj.symm, bind_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm,
ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.symm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_comm] using ENNReal.tsum_comm
#align pmf.bind_bind PMF.bind_bind
theorem bind_comm (p : PMF α) (q : PMF β) (f : α → β → PMF γ) :
(p.bind fun a => q.bind (f a)) = q.bind fun b => p.bind fun a => f a b :=
PMF.ext fun b => by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_inj.symm, bind_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm,
ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.symm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_comm] using ENNReal.tsum_comm
#align pmf.bind_comm PMF.bind_comm
section Measure
variable (s : Set β)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_bind_apply :
(p.bind f).toOuterMeasure s = ∑' a, p a * (f a).toOuterMeasure s :=
calc
(p.bind f).toOuterMeasure s = ∑' b, if b ∈ s then ∑' a, p a * f a b else 0 := by
simp [toOuterMeasure_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
_ = ∑' (b) (a), p a * if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 := tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs <;> simp
_ = ∑' (a) (b), p a * if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 :=
(tsum_comm' ENNReal.summable (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) fun _ => ENNReal.summable)
_ = ∑' a, p a * ∑' b, if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 := tsum_congr fun a => ENNReal.tsum_mul_left
_ = ∑' a, p a * ∑' b, if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 :=
(tsum_congr fun a => (congr_arg fun x => p a * x) <| tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs <;> rfl)
_ = ∑' a, p a * (f a).toOuterMeasure s :=
tsum_congr fun a => by simp only [toOuterMeasure_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
#align pmf.to_outer_measure_bind_apply PMF.toOuterMeasure_bind_apply
/-- The measure of a set under `p.bind f` is the sum over `a : α`
of the probability of `a` under `p` times the measure of the set under `f a`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_bind_apply [MeasurableSpace β] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(p.bind f).toMeasure s = ∑' a, p a * (f a).toMeasure s :=
(toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply (p.bind f) s hs).trans
((toOuterMeasure_bind_apply p f s).trans
(tsum_congr fun a =>
congr_arg (fun x => p a * x) (toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply (f a) s hs).symm))
#align pmf.to_measure_bind_apply PMF.toMeasure_bind_apply
end Measure
end Bind
instance : Monad PMF where
pure a := pure a
bind pa pb := pa.bind pb
section BindOnSupport
/-- Generalized version of `bind` allowing `f` to only be defined on the support of `p`.
`p.bind f` is equivalent to `p.bindOnSupport (fun a _ ↦ f a)`, see `bindOnSupport_eq_bind`. -/
def bindOnSupport (p : PMF α) (f : ∀ a ∈ p.support, PMF β) : PMF β :=
⟨fun b => ∑' a, p a * if h : p a = 0 then 0 else f a h b, ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.2 (by
refine ENNReal.tsum_comm.trans (_root_.trans (tsum_congr fun a => ?_) p.tsum_coe)
simp_rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, zero_mul]
· rw [(f a h).tsum_coe, mul_one])⟩
#align pmf.bind_on_support PMF.bindOnSupport
variable {p : PMF α} (f : ∀ a ∈ p.support, PMF β)
@[simp]
theorem bindOnSupport_apply (b : β) :
p.bindOnSupport f b = ∑' a, p a * if h : p a = 0 then 0 else f a h b := rfl
#align pmf.bind_on_support_apply PMF.bindOnSupport_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_bindOnSupport :
(p.bindOnSupport f).support = ⋃ (a : α) (h : a ∈ p.support), (f a h).support := by
refine Set.ext fun b => ?_
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, not_or, mem_support_iff, bindOnSupport_apply, Ne, not_forall,
mul_eq_zero, Set.mem_iUnion]
exact
⟨fun hb =>
let ⟨a, ⟨ha, ha'⟩⟩ := hb
⟨a, ha, by simpa [ha] using ha'⟩,
fun hb =>
let ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := hb
⟨a, ⟨ha, by simpa [(mem_support_iff _ a).1 ha] using ha'⟩⟩⟩
#align pmf.support_bind_on_support PMF.support_bindOnSupport
theorem mem_support_bindOnSupport_iff (b : β) :
b ∈ (p.bindOnSupport f).support ↔ ∃ (a : α) (h : a ∈ p.support), b ∈ (f a h).support := by
simp only [support_bindOnSupport, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion]
#align pmf.mem_support_bind_on_support_iff PMF.mem_support_bindOnSupport_iff
/-- `bindOnSupport` reduces to `bind` if `f` doesn't depend on the additional hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem bindOnSupport_eq_bind (p : PMF α) (f : α → PMF β) :
(p.bindOnSupport fun a _ => f a) = p.bind f := by
ext b
have : ∀ a, ite (p a = 0) 0 (p a * f a b) = p a * f a b :=
fun a => ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h => h.symm ▸ symm (zero_mul <| f a b)
simp only [bindOnSupport_apply fun a _ => f a, p.bind_apply f, dite_eq_ite, mul_ite,
mul_zero, this]
#align pmf.bind_on_support_eq_bind PMF.bindOnSupport_eq_bind
theorem bindOnSupport_eq_zero_iff (b : β) :
p.bindOnSupport f b = 0 ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : p a ≠ 0), f a ha b = 0 := by
simp only [bindOnSupport_apply, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_not_imp_left]
exact ⟨fun h a ha => Trans.trans (dif_neg ha).symm (h a ha),
fun h a ha => Trans.trans (dif_neg ha) (h a ha)⟩
#align pmf.bind_on_support_eq_zero_iff PMF.bindOnSupport_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem pure_bindOnSupport (a : α) (f : ∀ (a' : α) (_ : a' ∈ (pure a).support), PMF β) :
(pure a).bindOnSupport f = f a ((mem_support_pure_iff a a).mpr rfl) := by
refine PMF.ext fun b => ?_
simp only [bindOnSupport_apply, pure_apply]
refine _root_.trans (tsum_congr fun a' => ?_) (tsum_ite_eq a _)
by_cases h : a' = a <;> simp [h]
#align pmf.pure_bind_on_support PMF.pure_bindOnSupport
theorem bindOnSupport_pure (p : PMF α) : (p.bindOnSupport fun a _ => pure a) = p := by
simp only [PMF.bind_pure, PMF.bindOnSupport_eq_bind]
#align pmf.bind_on_support_pure PMF.bindOnSupport_pure
@[simp]
theorem bindOnSupport_bindOnSupport (p : PMF α) (f : ∀ a ∈ p.support, PMF β)
(g : ∀ b ∈ (p.bindOnSupport f).support, PMF γ) :
(p.bindOnSupport f).bindOnSupport g =
p.bindOnSupport fun a ha =>
(f a ha).bindOnSupport fun b hb =>
g b ((mem_support_bindOnSupport_iff f b).mpr ⟨a, ha, hb⟩) := by
refine PMF.ext fun a => ?_
dsimp only [bindOnSupport_apply]
simp only [← tsum_dite_right, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.symm]
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, dite_eq_left_iff]
refine ENNReal.tsum_comm.trans (tsum_congr fun a' => tsum_congr fun b => ?_)
split_ifs with h _ h_1 _ h_2
any_goals ring1
· have := h_1 a'
simp? [h] at this says simp only [h, ↓reduceDite, mul_eq_zero, false_or] at this
contradiction
· simp [h_2]
#align pmf.bind_on_support_bind_on_support PMF.bindOnSupport_bindOnSupport
theorem bindOnSupport_comm (p : PMF α) (q : PMF β) (f : ∀ a ∈ p.support, ∀ b ∈ q.support, PMF γ) :
(p.bindOnSupport fun a ha => q.bindOnSupport (f a ha)) =
q.bindOnSupport fun b hb => p.bindOnSupport fun a ha => f a ha b hb := by
apply PMF.ext; rintro c
simp only [ENNReal.coe_inj.symm, bindOnSupport_apply, ← tsum_dite_right,
ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.symm]
refine _root_.trans ENNReal.tsum_comm (tsum_congr fun b => tsum_congr fun a => ?_)
split_ifs with h1 h2 h2 <;> ring
#align pmf.bind_on_support_comm PMF.bindOnSupport_comm
section Measure
variable (s : Set β)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Monad.lean | 310 | 323 | theorem toOuterMeasure_bindOnSupport_apply :
(p.bindOnSupport f).toOuterMeasure s =
∑' a, p a * if h : p a = 0 then 0 else (f a h).toOuterMeasure s := by |
simp only [toOuterMeasure_apply, Set.indicator_apply, bindOnSupport_apply]
calc
(∑' b, ite (b ∈ s) (∑' a, p a * dite (p a = 0) (fun h => 0) fun h => f a h b) 0) =
∑' (b) (a), ite (b ∈ s) (p a * dite (p a = 0) (fun h => 0) fun h => f a h b) 0 :=
tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs with hbs <;> simp only [eq_self_iff_true, tsum_zero]
_ = ∑' (a) (b), ite (b ∈ s) (p a * dite (p a = 0) (fun h => 0) fun h => f a h b) 0 :=
ENNReal.tsum_comm
_ = ∑' a, p a * ∑' b, ite (b ∈ s) (dite (p a = 0) (fun h => 0) fun h => f a h b) 0 :=
(tsum_congr fun a => by simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, mul_ite, mul_zero])
_ = ∑' a, p a * dite (p a = 0) (fun h => 0) fun h => ∑' b, ite (b ∈ s) (f a h b) 0 :=
tsum_congr fun a => by split_ifs with ha <;> simp only [ite_self, tsum_zero, eq_self_iff_true]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Types
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.VanKampen
#align_import category_theory.extensive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
/-!
# Extensive categories
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive`: A category is (finitary) extensive if it has finite
coproducts, and binary coproducts are van Kampen.
## Main Results
- `CategoryTheory.hasStrictInitialObjects_of_finitaryExtensive`: The initial object
in extensive categories is strict.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit`: Coproduct injections are monic in
extensive categories.
- `CategoryTheory.BinaryCofan.isPullback_initial_to_of_isVanKampen`: In extensive categories,
sums are disjoint, i.e. the pullback of `X ⟶ X ⨿ Y` and `Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y` is the initial object.
- `CategoryTheory.types.finitaryExtensive`: The category of types is extensive.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive_TopCat`:
The category `Top` is extensive.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive_functor`: The category `C ⥤ D` is extensive if `D`
has all pullbacks and is extensive.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.isVanKampen_finiteCoproducts`: Finite coproducts in a
finitary extensive category are van Kampen.
## TODO
Show that the following are finitary extensive:
- `Scheme`
- `AffineScheme` (`CommRingᵒᵖ`)
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/extensive+category
- [Carboni et al, Introduction to extensive and distributive categories][CARBONI1993145]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u v'' u''
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {D : Type u''} [Category.{v''} D]
section Extensive
variable {X Y : C}
/-- A category has pullback of inclusions if it has all pullbacks along coproduct injections. -/
class HasPullbacksOfInclusions (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [HasBinaryCoproducts C] : Prop where
[hasPullbackInl : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y), HasPullback coprod.inl f]
attribute [instance] HasPullbacksOfInclusions.hasPullbackInl
/--
A functor preserves pullback of inclusions if it preserves all pullbacks along coproduct injections.
-/
class PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions {C : Type*} [Category C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
(F : C ⥤ D) [HasBinaryCoproducts C] where
[preservesPullbackInl : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y), PreservesLimit (cospan coprod.inl f) F]
attribute [instance] PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions.preservesPullbackInl
/-- A category is (finitary) pre-extensive if it has finite coproducts,
and binary coproducts are universal. -/
class FinitaryPreExtensive (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
[hasFiniteCoproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
[hasPullbacksOfInclusions : HasPullbacksOfInclusions C]
/-- In a finitary extensive category, all coproducts are van Kampen-/
universal' : ∀ {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y), IsColimit c → IsUniversalColimit c
attribute [instance] FinitaryPreExtensive.hasFiniteCoproducts
attribute [instance] FinitaryPreExtensive.hasPullbacksOfInclusions
/-- A category is (finitary) extensive if it has finite coproducts,
and binary coproducts are van Kampen. -/
class FinitaryExtensive (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
[hasFiniteCoproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
[hasPullbacksOfInclusions : HasPullbacksOfInclusions C]
/-- In a finitary extensive category, all coproducts are van Kampen-/
van_kampen' : ∀ {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y), IsColimit c → IsVanKampenColimit c
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive
attribute [instance] FinitaryExtensive.hasFiniteCoproducts
attribute [instance] FinitaryExtensive.hasPullbacksOfInclusions
theorem FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen [FinitaryExtensive C] {F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C}
(c : Cocone F) (hc : IsColimit c) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
let X := F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
let Y := F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
have : F = pair X Y := by
apply Functor.hext
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩ <;> simp
clear_value X Y
subst this
exact FinitaryExtensive.van_kampen' c hc
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.van_kampen CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen
namespace HasPullbacksOfInclusions
instance (priority := 100) [HasBinaryCoproducts C] [HasPullbacks C] :
HasPullbacksOfInclusions C := ⟨⟩
variable [HasBinaryCoproducts C] [HasPullbacksOfInclusions C] {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y)
instance preservesPullbackInl' :
HasPullback f coprod.inl :=
hasPullback_symmetry _ _
instance hasPullbackInr' :
HasPullback f coprod.inr := by
have : IsPullback (𝟙 _) (f ≫ (coprod.braiding X Y).hom) f (coprod.braiding Y X).hom :=
IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
have := (IsPullback.of_hasPullback (f ≫ (coprod.braiding X Y).hom) coprod.inl).paste_horiz this
simp only [coprod.braiding_hom, Category.comp_id, colimit.ι_desc, BinaryCofan.mk_pt,
BinaryCofan.ι_app_left, BinaryCofan.mk_inl] at this
exact ⟨⟨⟨_, this.isLimit⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullbackInr :
HasPullback coprod.inr f :=
hasPullback_symmetry _ _
end HasPullbacksOfInclusions
namespace PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions
variable {D : Type*} [Category D] [HasBinaryCoproducts C] (F : C ⥤ D)
noncomputable
instance (priority := 100) [PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F] :
PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions F := ⟨⟩
variable [PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions F] {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y)
noncomputable
instance preservesPullbackInl' :
PreservesLimit (cospan f coprod.inl) F :=
preservesPullbackSymmetry _ _ _
noncomputable
instance preservesPullbackInr' :
PreservesLimit (cospan f coprod.inr) F := by
apply preservesLimitOfIsoDiagram (K₁ := cospan (f ≫ (coprod.braiding X Y).hom) coprod.inl)
apply cospanExt (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (coprod.braiding X Y).symm <;> simp
noncomputable
instance preservesPullbackInr :
PreservesLimit (cospan coprod.inr f) F :=
preservesPullbackSymmetry _ _ _
end PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions
instance (priority := 100) FinitaryExtensive.toFinitaryPreExtensive [FinitaryExtensive C] :
FinitaryPreExtensive C :=
⟨fun c hc ↦ (FinitaryExtensive.van_kampen' c hc).isUniversal⟩
theorem FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit [FinitaryExtensive C] {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(hc : IsColimit c) : Mono c.inr :=
BinaryCofan.mono_inr_of_isVanKampen (FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen c hc)
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.mono_inr_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit
theorem FinitaryExtensive.mono_inl_of_isColimit [FinitaryExtensive C] {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(hc : IsColimit c) : Mono c.inl :=
FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit (BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip hc)
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.mono_inl_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.mono_inl_of_isColimit
instance [FinitaryExtensive C] (X Y : C) : Mono (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) :=
(FinitaryExtensive.mono_inl_of_isColimit (coprodIsCoprod X Y) : _)
instance [FinitaryExtensive C] (X Y : C) : Mono (coprod.inr : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y) :=
(FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit (coprodIsCoprod X Y) : _)
theorem FinitaryExtensive.isPullback_initial_to_binaryCofan [FinitaryExtensive C]
{c : BinaryCofan X Y} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsPullback (initial.to _) (initial.to _) c.inl c.inr :=
BinaryCofan.isPullback_initial_to_of_isVanKampen (FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen c hc)
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.is_pullback_initial_to_binary_cofan CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.isPullback_initial_to_binaryCofan
instance (priority := 100) hasStrictInitialObjects_of_finitaryPreExtensive
[FinitaryPreExtensive C] : HasStrictInitialObjects C :=
hasStrictInitial_of_isUniversal (FinitaryPreExtensive.universal' _
((BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr initialIsInitial _).mpr (by
dsimp
infer_instance)).some)
#align category_theory.has_strict_initial_objects_of_finitary_extensive CategoryTheory.hasStrictInitialObjects_of_finitaryPreExtensive
theorem finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [HasFiniteCoproducts C]
[HasPullbacksOfInclusions C]
(T : C) (HT : IsTerminal T) (c₀ : BinaryCofan T T) (hc₀ : IsColimit c₀) :
FinitaryExtensive C ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c₀ := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.van_kampen' c₀ hc₀, fun H => ?_⟩
constructor
simp_rw [BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_iff] at H ⊢
intro X Y c hc X' Y' c' αX αY f hX hY
obtain ⟨d, hd, hd'⟩ :=
Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' hc (HT.from _ ≫ c₀.inl) (HT.from _ ≫ c₀.inr)
rw [H c' (αX ≫ HT.from _) (αY ≫ HT.from _) (f ≫ d) (by rw [← reassoc_of% hX, hd, Category.assoc])
(by rw [← reassoc_of% hY, hd', Category.assoc])]
obtain ⟨hl, hr⟩ := (H c (HT.from _) (HT.from _) d hd.symm hd'.symm).mp ⟨hc⟩
rw [hl.paste_vert_iff hX.symm, hr.paste_vert_iff hY.symm]
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive_iff_of_is_terminal CategoryTheory.finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal
instance types.finitaryExtensive : FinitaryExtensive (Type u) := by
classical
rw [finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal (Type u) PUnit Types.isTerminalPunit _
(Types.binaryCoproductColimit _ _)]
apply BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_mk _ _ (fun X Y => Types.binaryCoproductColimit X Y) _
fun f g => (Limits.Types.pullbackLimitCone f g).2
· intros _ _ _ _ f hαX hαY
constructor
· refine ⟨⟨hαX.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inl y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· simp only [Types.binaryCoproductCocone_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj, Sum.inl.injEq,
exists_unique_eq']
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((congr_fun s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans (congr_fun hαY val : _).symm
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
exact ⟨l, (funext hl).symm, Types.isTerminalPunit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ => funext fun x => hl' x (l' x) (congr_fun h₁ x).symm⟩
· refine ⟨⟨hαY.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inr y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((congr_fun s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans (congr_fun hαX val : _).symm
· simp only [Types.binaryCoproductCocone_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj, Sum.inr.injEq,
exists_unique_eq']
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
exact ⟨l, (funext hl).symm, Types.isTerminalPunit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ => funext fun x => hl' x (l' x) (congr_fun h₁ x).symm⟩
· intro Z f
dsimp [Limits.Types.binaryCoproductCocone]
delta Types.PullbackObj
have : ∀ x, f x = Sum.inl PUnit.unit ∨ f x = Sum.inr PUnit.unit := by
intro x
rcases f x with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
exacts [Or.inl rfl, Or.inr rfl]
let eX : { p : Z × PUnit // f p.fst = Sum.inl p.snd } ≃ { x : Z // f x = Sum.inl PUnit.unit } :=
⟨fun p => ⟨p.1.1, by convert p.2⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨_, _⟩, x.2⟩, fun _ => by ext; rfl,
fun _ => by ext; rfl⟩
let eY : { p : Z × PUnit // f p.fst = Sum.inr p.snd } ≃ { x : Z // f x = Sum.inr PUnit.unit } :=
⟨fun p => ⟨p.1.1, p.2.trans (congr_arg Sum.inr <| Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩,
fun x => ⟨⟨_, _⟩, x.2⟩, fun _ => by ext; rfl, fun _ => by ext; rfl⟩
fapply BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
· exact fun s x => dite _ (fun h => s.inl <| eX.symm ⟨x, h⟩)
fun h => s.inr <| eY.symm ⟨x, (this x).resolve_left h⟩
· intro s
ext ⟨⟨x, ⟨⟩⟩, _⟩
dsimp
split_ifs <;> rfl
· intro s
ext ⟨⟨x, ⟨⟩⟩, hx⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· cases h.symm.trans hx
· rfl
· intro s m e₁ e₂
ext x
split_ifs
· rw [← e₁]
rfl
· rw [← e₂]
rfl
#align category_theory.types.finitary_extensive CategoryTheory.types.finitaryExtensive
section TopCat
/-- (Implementation) An auxiliary lemma for the proof that `TopCat` is finitary extensive. -/
noncomputable def finitaryExtensiveTopCatAux (Z : TopCat.{u})
(f : Z ⟶ TopCat.of (Sum PUnit.{u + 1} PUnit.{u + 1})) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk
(TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (TopCat.of PUnit) (TopCat.of PUnit)).inl)
(TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (TopCat.of PUnit) (TopCat.of PUnit)).inr)) := by
have h₁ : Set.range (TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (.of PUnit) (.of PUnit)).inl) =
f ⁻¹' Set.range Sum.inl := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨PUnit.unit, x.2.symm⟩
· rintro x ⟨⟨⟩, hx⟩; refine ⟨⟨⟨x, PUnit.unit⟩, hx.symm⟩, rfl⟩
have h₂ : Set.range (TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (.of PUnit) (.of PUnit)).inr) =
f ⁻¹' Set.range Sum.inr := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨PUnit.unit, x.2.symm⟩
· rintro x ⟨⟨⟩, hx⟩; refine ⟨⟨⟨x, PUnit.unit⟩, hx.symm⟩, rfl⟩
refine ((TopCat.binaryCofan_isColimit_iff _).mpr ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩).some
· refine ⟨(Homeomorph.prodPUnit Z).embedding.comp embedding_subtype_val, ?_⟩
convert f.2.1 _ isOpen_range_inl
· refine ⟨(Homeomorph.prodPUnit Z).embedding.comp embedding_subtype_val, ?_⟩
convert f.2.1 _ isOpen_range_inr
· convert Set.isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.preimage f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive_Top_aux CategoryTheory.finitaryExtensiveTopCatAux
instance finitaryExtensive_TopCat : FinitaryExtensive TopCat.{u} := by
rw [finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal TopCat.{u} _ TopCat.isTerminalPUnit _
(TopCat.binaryCofanIsColimit _ _)]
apply BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_mk _ _ (fun X Y => TopCat.binaryCofanIsColimit X Y) _
fun f g => TopCat.pullbackConeIsLimit f g
· intro X' Y' αX αY f hαX hαY
constructor
· refine ⟨⟨hαX.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inl y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· exact ⟨val, rfl, fun y h => Sum.inl_injective h.symm⟩
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((ConcreteCategory.congr_hom s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans
(ConcreteCategory.congr_hom hαY val : _).symm
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
refine ⟨⟨l, ?_⟩, ContinuousMap.ext fun a => (hl a).symm, TopCat.isTerminalPUnit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ => ContinuousMap.ext fun x =>
hl' x (l' x) (ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x).symm⟩
apply (embedding_inl (X := X') (Y := Y')).toInducing.continuous_iff.mpr
convert s.fst.2 using 1
exact (funext hl).symm
· refine ⟨⟨hαY.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inr y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((ConcreteCategory.congr_hom s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans
(ConcreteCategory.congr_hom hαX val : _).symm
· exact ⟨val, rfl, fun y h => Sum.inr_injective h.symm⟩
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
refine ⟨⟨l, ?_⟩, ContinuousMap.ext fun a => (hl a).symm, TopCat.isTerminalPUnit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ =>
ContinuousMap.ext fun x => hl' x (l' x) (ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x).symm⟩
apply (embedding_inr (X := X') (Y := Y')).toInducing.continuous_iff.mpr
convert s.fst.2 using 1
exact (funext hl).symm
· intro Z f
exact finitaryExtensiveTopCatAux Z f
end TopCat
section Functor
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Extensive.lean | 363 | 386 | theorem finitaryExtensive_of_reflective
[HasFiniteCoproducts D] [HasPullbacksOfInclusions D] [FinitaryExtensive C]
{Gl : C ⥤ D} {Gr : D ⥤ C} (adj : Gl ⊣ Gr) [Gr.Full] [Gr.Faithful]
[∀ X Y (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj Y), HasPullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app Y)]
[∀ X Y (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj Y), PreservesLimit (cospan (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app Y)) Gl]
[PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions Gl] :
FinitaryExtensive D := by |
have : PreservesColimitsOfSize Gl := adj.leftAdjointPreservesColimits
constructor
intros X Y c hc
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff
(isoWhiskerLeft _ (asIso adj.counit) ≪≫ Functor.rightUnitor _).hom).mp
have : ∀ (Z : C) (i : Discrete WalkingPair) (f : Z ⟶ (colimit.cocone (pair X Y ⋙ Gr)).pt),
PreservesLimit (cospan f ((colimit.cocone (pair X Y ⋙ Gr)).ι.app i)) Gl := by
have : pair X Y ⋙ Gr = pair (Gr.obj X) (Gr.obj Y) := by
apply Functor.hext
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩ <;> simp
rw [this]
rintro Z ⟨_|_⟩ f <;> dsimp <;> infer_instance
refine ((FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen _ (colimit.isColimit <| pair X Y ⋙ _)).map_reflective
adj).of_iso (IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso ?_ ?_)
· exact isColimitOfPreserves Gl (colimit.isColimit _)
· exact (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm hc
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
#align_import logic.equiv.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cd391184c85986113f8c00844cfe6dda1d34be3d"
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we continue the work on equivalences begun in `Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean`, defining
* canonical isomorphisms between various types: e.g.,
- `Equiv.sumEquivSigmaBool` is the canonical equivalence between the sum of two types `α ⊕ β`
and the sigma-type `Σ b : Bool, b.casesOn α β`;
- `Equiv.prodSumDistrib : α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ)` shows that type product and type sum
satisfy the distributive law up to a canonical equivalence;
* operations on equivalences: e.g.,
- `Equiv.prodCongr ea eb : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`: combine two equivalences `ea : α₁ ≃ α₂` and
`eb : β₁ ≃ β₂` using `Prod.map`.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Data/Equiv/TransferInstance.lean` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u
open Function
namespace Equiv
/-- `PProd α β` is equivalent to `α × β` -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def pprodEquivProd : PProd α β ≃ α × β where
toFun x := (x.1, x.2)
invFun x := ⟨x.1, x.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod Equiv.pprodEquivProd
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProd_apply
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProd_symm_apply
/-- Product of two equivalences, in terms of `PProd`. If `α ≃ β` and `γ ≃ δ`, then
`PProd α γ ≃ PProd β δ`. -/
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 this had `@[congr]`
@[simps apply]
def pprodCongr (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : γ ≃ δ) : PProd α γ ≃ PProd β δ where
toFun x := ⟨e₁ x.1, e₂ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨e₁.symm x.1, e₂.symm x.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp
#align equiv.pprod_congr Equiv.pprodCongr
#align equiv.pprod_congr_apply Equiv.pprodCongr_apply
/-- Combine two equivalences using `PProd` in the domain and `Prod` in the codomain. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def pprodProd (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
PProd α₁ β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
(ea.pprodCongr eb).trans pprodEquivProd
#align equiv.pprod_prod Equiv.pprodProd
#align equiv.pprod_prod_apply Equiv.pprodProd_apply
#align equiv.pprod_prod_symm_apply Equiv.pprodProd_symm_apply
/-- Combine two equivalences using `PProd` in the codomain and `Prod` in the domain. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def prodPProd (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
α₁ × β₁ ≃ PProd α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.symm.pprodProd eb.symm).symm
#align equiv.prod_pprod Equiv.prodPProd
#align equiv.prod_pprod_symm_apply Equiv.prodPProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.prod_pprod_apply Equiv.prodPProd_apply
/-- `PProd α β` is equivalent to `PLift α × PLift β` -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def pprodEquivProdPLift : PProd α β ≃ PLift α × PLift β :=
Equiv.plift.symm.pprodProd Equiv.plift.symm
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift_symm_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift_symm_apply
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift_apply
/-- Product of two equivalences. If `α₁ ≃ α₂` and `β₁ ≃ β₂`, then `α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`. This is
`Prod.map` as an equivalence. -/
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 there was also a @[congr] tag
@[simps (config := .asFn) apply]
def prodCongr (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
⟨Prod.map e₁ e₂, Prod.map e₁.symm e₂.symm, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp⟩
#align equiv.prod_congr Equiv.prodCongr
#align equiv.prod_congr_apply Equiv.prodCongr_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodCongr_symm (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(prodCongr e₁ e₂).symm = prodCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_symm Equiv.prodCongr_symm
/-- Type product is commutative up to an equivalence: `α × β ≃ β × α`. This is `Prod.swap` as an
equivalence. -/
def prodComm (α β) : α × β ≃ β × α :=
⟨Prod.swap, Prod.swap, Prod.swap_swap, Prod.swap_swap⟩
#align equiv.prod_comm Equiv.prodComm
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodComm (α β) : (⇑(prodComm α β) : α × β → β × α) = Prod.swap :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_prod_comm Equiv.coe_prodComm
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_apply (x : α × β) : prodComm α β x = x.swap :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_comm_apply Equiv.prodComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_symm (α β) : (prodComm α β).symm = prodComm β α :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_comm_symm Equiv.prodComm_symm
/-- Type product is associative up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def prodAssoc (α β γ) : (α × β) × γ ≃ α × β × γ :=
⟨fun p => (p.1.1, p.1.2, p.2), fun p => ((p.1, p.2.1), p.2.2), fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => rfl,
fun ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.prod_assoc Equiv.prodAssoc
#align equiv.prod_assoc_symm_apply Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply
#align equiv.prod_assoc_apply Equiv.prodAssoc_apply
/-- Four-way commutativity of `prod`. The name matches `mul_mul_mul_comm`. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodProdProdComm (α β γ δ : Type*) : (α × β) × γ × δ ≃ (α × γ) × β × δ where
toFun abcd := ((abcd.1.1, abcd.2.1), (abcd.1.2, abcd.2.2))
invFun acbd := ((acbd.1.1, acbd.2.1), (acbd.1.2, acbd.2.2))
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨_a, _b⟩, ⟨_c, _d⟩⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_a, _c⟩, ⟨_b, _d⟩⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.prod_prod_prod_comm Equiv.prodProdProdComm
@[simp]
theorem prodProdProdComm_symm (α β γ δ : Type*) :
(prodProdProdComm α β γ δ).symm = prodProdProdComm α γ β δ :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_prod_prod_comm_symm Equiv.prodProdProdComm_symm
/-- `γ`-valued functions on `α × β` are equivalent to functions `α → β → γ`. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def curry (α β γ) : (α × β → γ) ≃ (α → β → γ) where
toFun := Function.curry
invFun := uncurry
left_inv := uncurry_curry
right_inv := curry_uncurry
#align equiv.curry Equiv.curry
#align equiv.curry_symm_apply Equiv.curry_symm_apply
#align equiv.curry_apply Equiv.curry_apply
section
/-- `PUnit` is a right identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def prodPUnit (α) : α × PUnit ≃ α :=
⟨fun p => p.1, fun a => (a, PUnit.unit), fun ⟨_, PUnit.unit⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.prod_punit Equiv.prodPUnit
#align equiv.prod_punit_apply Equiv.prodPUnit_apply
#align equiv.prod_punit_symm_apply Equiv.prodPUnit_symm_apply
/-- `PUnit` is a left identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps!]
def punitProd (α) : PUnit × α ≃ α :=
calc
PUnit × α ≃ α × PUnit := prodComm _ _
_ ≃ α := prodPUnit _
#align equiv.punit_prod Equiv.punitProd
#align equiv.punit_prod_symm_apply Equiv.punitProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.punit_prod_apply Equiv.punitProd_apply
/-- `PUnit` is a right identity for dependent type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaPUnit (α) : (_ : α) × PUnit ≃ α :=
⟨fun p => p.1, fun a => ⟨a, PUnit.unit⟩, fun ⟨_, PUnit.unit⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Any `Unique` type is a right identity for type product up to equivalence. -/
def prodUnique (α β) [Unique β] : α × β ≃ α :=
((Equiv.refl α).prodCongr <| equivPUnit.{_,1} β).trans <| prodPUnit α
#align equiv.prod_unique Equiv.prodUnique
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodUnique [Unique β] : (⇑(prodUnique α β) : α × β → α) = Prod.fst :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_prod_unique Equiv.coe_prodUnique
theorem prodUnique_apply [Unique β] (x : α × β) : prodUnique α β x = x.1 :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_unique_apply Equiv.prodUnique_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodUnique_symm_apply [Unique β] (x : α) :
(prodUnique α β).symm x = (x, default) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_unique_symm_apply Equiv.prodUnique_symm_apply
/-- Any `Unique` type is a left identity for type product up to equivalence. -/
def uniqueProd (α β) [Unique β] : β × α ≃ α :=
((equivPUnit.{_,1} β).prodCongr <| Equiv.refl α).trans <| punitProd α
#align equiv.unique_prod Equiv.uniqueProd
@[simp]
theorem coe_uniqueProd [Unique β] : (⇑(uniqueProd α β) : β × α → α) = Prod.snd :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_unique_prod Equiv.coe_uniqueProd
theorem uniqueProd_apply [Unique β] (x : β × α) : uniqueProd α β x = x.2 :=
rfl
#align equiv.unique_prod_apply Equiv.uniqueProd_apply
@[simp]
theorem uniqueProd_symm_apply [Unique β] (x : α) :
(uniqueProd α β).symm x = (default, x) :=
rfl
#align equiv.unique_prod_symm_apply Equiv.uniqueProd_symm_apply
/-- Any family of `Unique` types is a right identity for dependent type product up to
equivalence. -/
def sigmaUnique (α) (β : α → Type*) [∀ a, Unique (β a)] : (a : α) × (β a) ≃ α :=
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun a ↦ equivPUnit.{_,1} (β a)).trans <| sigmaPUnit α
@[simp]
theorem coe_sigmaUnique {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] :
(⇑(sigmaUnique α β) : (a : α) × (β a) → α) = Sigma.fst :=
rfl
theorem sigmaUnique_apply {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] (x : (a : α) × β a) :
sigmaUnique α β x = x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sigmaUnique_symm_apply {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] (x : α) :
(sigmaUnique α β).symm x = ⟨x, default⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `Empty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prodEmpty (α) : α × Empty ≃ Empty :=
equivEmpty _
#align equiv.prod_empty Equiv.prodEmpty
/-- `Empty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def emptyProd (α) : Empty × α ≃ Empty :=
equivEmpty _
#align equiv.empty_prod Equiv.emptyProd
/-- `PEmpty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prodPEmpty (α) : α × PEmpty ≃ PEmpty :=
equivPEmpty _
#align equiv.prod_pempty Equiv.prodPEmpty
/-- `PEmpty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def pemptyProd (α) : PEmpty × α ≃ PEmpty :=
equivPEmpty _
#align equiv.pempty_prod Equiv.pemptyProd
end
section
open Sum
/-- `PSum` is equivalent to `Sum`. -/
def psumEquivSum (α β) : PSum α β ≃ Sum α β where
toFun s := PSum.casesOn s inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim PSum.inl PSum.inr
left_inv s := by cases s <;> rfl
right_inv s := by cases s <;> rfl
#align equiv.psum_equiv_sum Equiv.psumEquivSum
/-- If `α ≃ α'` and `β ≃ β'`, then `α ⊕ β ≃ α' ⊕ β'`. This is `Sum.map` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps apply]
def sumCongr (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) : Sum α₁ β₁ ≃ Sum α₂ β₂ :=
⟨Sum.map ea eb, Sum.map ea.symm eb.symm, fun x => by simp, fun x => by simp⟩
#align equiv.sum_congr Equiv.sumCongr
#align equiv.sum_congr_apply Equiv.sumCongr_apply
/-- If `α ≃ α'` and `β ≃ β'`, then `PSum α β ≃ PSum α' β'`. -/
def psumCongr (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : γ ≃ δ) : PSum α γ ≃ PSum β δ where
toFun x := PSum.casesOn x (PSum.inl ∘ e₁) (PSum.inr ∘ e₂)
invFun x := PSum.casesOn x (PSum.inl ∘ e₁.symm) (PSum.inr ∘ e₂.symm)
left_inv := by rintro (x | x) <;> simp
right_inv := by rintro (x | x) <;> simp
#align equiv.psum_congr Equiv.psumCongr
/-- Combine two `Equiv`s using `PSum` in the domain and `Sum` in the codomain. -/
def psumSum (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
PSum α₁ β₁ ≃ Sum α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.psumCongr eb).trans (psumEquivSum _ _)
#align equiv.psum_sum Equiv.psumSum
/-- Combine two `Equiv`s using `Sum` in the domain and `PSum` in the codomain. -/
def sumPSum (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
Sum α₁ β₁ ≃ PSum α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.symm.psumSum eb.symm).symm
#align equiv.sum_psum Equiv.sumPSum
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_trans (e : α₁ ≃ β₁) (f : α₂ ≃ β₂) (g : β₁ ≃ γ₁) (h : β₂ ≃ γ₂) :
(Equiv.sumCongr e f).trans (Equiv.sumCongr g h) = Equiv.sumCongr (e.trans g) (f.trans h) := by
ext i
cases i <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_trans Equiv.sumCongr_trans
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : γ ≃ δ) :
(Equiv.sumCongr e f).symm = Equiv.sumCongr e.symm f.symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_symm Equiv.sumCongr_symm
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_refl : Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (Sum α β) := by
ext i
cases i <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_refl Equiv.sumCongr_refl
/-- A subtype of a sum is equivalent to a sum of subtypes. -/
def subtypeSum {p : α ⊕ β → Prop} : {c // p c} ≃ {a // p (Sum.inl a)} ⊕ {b // p (Sum.inr b)} where
toFun c := match h : c.1 with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl ⟨a, h ▸ c.2⟩
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr ⟨b, h ▸ c.2⟩
invFun c := match c with
| Sum.inl a => ⟨Sum.inl a, a.2⟩
| Sum.inr b => ⟨Sum.inr b, b.2⟩
left_inv := by rintro ⟨a | b, h⟩ <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (a | b) <;> rfl
namespace Perm
/-- Combine a permutation of `α` and of `β` into a permutation of `α ⊕ β`. -/
abbrev sumCongr (ea : Equiv.Perm α) (eb : Equiv.Perm β) : Equiv.Perm (Sum α β) :=
Equiv.sumCongr ea eb
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr Equiv.Perm.sumCongr
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_apply (ea : Equiv.Perm α) (eb : Equiv.Perm β) (x : Sum α β) :
sumCongr ea eb x = Sum.map (⇑ea) (⇑eb) x :=
Equiv.sumCongr_apply ea eb x
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_apply Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_apply
-- Porting note: it seems the general theorem about `Equiv` is now applied, so there's no need
-- to have this version also have `@[simp]`. Similarly for below.
theorem sumCongr_trans (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : Equiv.Perm β) (g : Equiv.Perm α)
(h : Equiv.Perm β) : (sumCongr e f).trans (sumCongr g h) = sumCongr (e.trans g) (f.trans h) :=
Equiv.sumCongr_trans e f g h
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_trans Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_trans
theorem sumCongr_symm (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : Equiv.Perm β) :
(sumCongr e f).symm = sumCongr e.symm f.symm :=
Equiv.sumCongr_symm e f
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_symm Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_symm
theorem sumCongr_refl : sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (Sum α β) :=
Equiv.sumCongr_refl
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_refl Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_refl
end Perm
/-- `Bool` is equivalent the sum of two `PUnit`s. -/
def boolEquivPUnitSumPUnit : Bool ≃ Sum PUnit.{u + 1} PUnit.{v + 1} :=
⟨fun b => b.casesOn (inl PUnit.unit) (inr PUnit.unit) , Sum.elim (fun _ => false) fun _ => true,
fun b => by cases b <;> rfl, fun s => by rcases s with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit Equiv.boolEquivPUnitSumPUnit
/-- Sum of types is commutative up to an equivalence. This is `Sum.swap` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn) apply]
def sumComm (α β) : Sum α β ≃ Sum β α :=
⟨Sum.swap, Sum.swap, Sum.swap_swap, Sum.swap_swap⟩
#align equiv.sum_comm Equiv.sumComm
#align equiv.sum_comm_apply Equiv.sumComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem sumComm_symm (α β) : (sumComm α β).symm = sumComm β α :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_comm_symm Equiv.sumComm_symm
/-- Sum of types is associative up to an equivalence. -/
def sumAssoc (α β γ) : Sum (Sum α β) γ ≃ Sum α (Sum β γ) :=
⟨Sum.elim (Sum.elim Sum.inl (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inl)) (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr),
Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inl) <| Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inr) Sum.inr,
by rintro (⟨_ | _⟩ | _) <;> rfl, by
rintro (_ | ⟨_ | _⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_assoc Equiv.sumAssoc
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl (a) : sumAssoc α β γ (inl (inl a)) = inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inl_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr (b) : sumAssoc α β γ (inl (inr b)) = inr (inl b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inl_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inr (c) : sumAssoc α β γ (inr c) = inr (inr c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inl {α β γ} (a) : (sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inl a) = inl (inl a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inl {α β γ} (b) :
(sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inr (inl b)) = inl (inr b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inr_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inr {α β γ} (c) : (sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inr (inr c)) = inr c :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inr_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inr
/-- Sum with `IsEmpty` is equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def sumEmpty (α β) [IsEmpty β] : Sum α β ≃ α where
toFun := Sum.elim id isEmptyElim
invFun := inl
left_inv s := by
rcases s with (_ | x)
· rfl
· exact isEmptyElim x
right_inv _ := rfl
#align equiv.sum_empty Equiv.sumEmpty
#align equiv.sum_empty_symm_apply Equiv.sumEmpty_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem sumEmpty_apply_inl [IsEmpty β] (a : α) : sumEmpty α β (Sum.inl a) = a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_empty_apply_inl Equiv.sumEmpty_apply_inl
/-- The sum of `IsEmpty` with any type is equivalent to that type. -/
@[simps! symm_apply]
def emptySum (α β) [IsEmpty α] : Sum α β ≃ β :=
(sumComm _ _).trans <| sumEmpty _ _
#align equiv.empty_sum Equiv.emptySum
#align equiv.empty_sum_symm_apply Equiv.emptySum_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem emptySum_apply_inr [IsEmpty α] (b : β) : emptySum α β (Sum.inr b) = b :=
rfl
#align equiv.empty_sum_apply_inr Equiv.emptySum_apply_inr
/-- `Option α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ PUnit` -/
def optionEquivSumPUnit (α) : Option α ≃ Sum α PUnit :=
⟨fun o => o.elim (inr PUnit.unit) inl, fun s => s.elim some fun _ => none,
fun o => by cases o <;> rfl,
fun s => by rcases s with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_none : optionEquivSumPUnit α none = Sum.inr PUnit.unit :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_none Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_none
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_some (a) : optionEquivSumPUnit α (some a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_some Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_some
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_coe (a : α) : optionEquivSumPUnit α a = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_coe Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_coe
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inl (a) : (optionEquivSumPUnit α).symm (Sum.inl a) = a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inl Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inl
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inr (a) : (optionEquivSumPUnit α).symm (Sum.inr a) = none :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inr Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inr
/-- The set of `x : Option α` such that `isSome x` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps]
def optionIsSomeEquiv (α) : { x : Option α // x.isSome } ≃ α where
toFun o := Option.get _ o.2
invFun x := ⟨some x, rfl⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.eq <| Option.some_get _
right_inv _ := Option.get_some _ _
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv_apply Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv_apply
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv_symm_apply_coe Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv_symm_apply_coe
/-- The product over `Option α` of `β a` is the binary product of the
product over `α` of `β (some α)` and `β none` -/
@[simps]
def piOptionEquivProd {β : Option α → Type*} :
(∀ a : Option α, β a) ≃ β none × ∀ a : α, β (some a) where
toFun f := (f none, fun a => f (some a))
invFun x a := Option.casesOn a x.fst x.snd
left_inv f := funext fun a => by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv x := by simp
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod Equiv.piOptionEquivProd
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.piOptionEquivProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.piOptionEquivProd_apply
/-- `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to a `Sigma`-type over `Bool`. Note that this definition assumes `α` and
`β` to be types from the same universe, so it cannot be used directly to transfer theorems about
sigma types to theorems about sum types. In many cases one can use `ULift` to work around this
difficulty. -/
def sumEquivSigmaBool (α β : Type u) : Sum α β ≃ Σ b : Bool, b.casesOn α β :=
⟨fun s => s.elim (fun x => ⟨false, x⟩) fun x => ⟨true, x⟩, fun s =>
match s with
| ⟨false, a⟩ => inl a
| ⟨true, b⟩ => inr b,
fun s => by cases s <;> rfl, fun s => by rcases s with ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool Equiv.sumEquivSigmaBool
-- See also `Equiv.sigmaPreimageEquiv`.
/-- `sigmaFiberEquiv f` for `f : α → β` is the natural equivalence between
the type of all fibres of `f` and the total space `α`. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : (Σ y : β, { x // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => ↑x.2, fun x => ⟨f x, x, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_apply Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_apply
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_symm_apply_fst Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_symm_apply_fst
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_symm_apply_snd_coe Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_symm_apply_snd_coe
/-- Inhabited types are equivalent to `Option β` for some `β` by identifying `default` with `none`.
-/
def sigmaEquivOptionOfInhabited (α : Type u) [Inhabited α] [DecidableEq α] :
Σ β : Type u, α ≃ Option β where
fst := {a // a ≠ default}
snd.toFun a := if h : a = default then none else some ⟨a, h⟩
snd.invFun := Option.elim' default (↑)
snd.left_inv a := by dsimp only; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
snd.right_inv
| none => by simp
| some ⟨a, ha⟩ => dif_neg ha
#align equiv.sigma_equiv_option_of_inhabited Equiv.sigmaEquivOptionOfInhabited
end
section sumCompl
/-- For any predicate `p` on `α`,
the sum of the two subtypes `{a // p a}` and its complement `{a // ¬ p a}`
is naturally equivalent to `α`.
See `subtypeOrEquiv` for sum types over subtypes `{x // p x}` and `{x // q x}`
that are not necessarily `IsCompl p q`. -/
def sumCompl {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Sum { a // p a } { a // ¬p a } ≃ α where
toFun := Sum.elim Subtype.val Subtype.val
invFun a := if h : p a then Sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ else Sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩
left_inv := by
rintro (⟨x, hx⟩ | ⟨x, hx⟩) <;> dsimp
· rw [dif_pos]
· rw [dif_neg]
right_inv a := by
dsimp
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl Equiv.sumCompl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inl (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : { a // p a }) :
sumCompl p (Sum.inl x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_inl Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inr (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : { a // ¬p a }) :
sumCompl p (Sum.inr x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_inr Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_symm_of_pos (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (a : α) (h : p a) :
(sumCompl p).symm a = Sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_symm_of_pos Equiv.sumCompl_apply_symm_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_symm_of_neg (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
(sumCompl p).symm a = Sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_symm_of_neg Equiv.sumCompl_apply_symm_of_neg
/-- Combines an `Equiv` between two subtypes with an `Equiv` between their complements to form a
permutation. -/
def subtypeCongr {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(e : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x }) (f : { x // ¬p x } ≃ { x // ¬q x }) : Perm α :=
(sumCompl p).symm.trans ((sumCongr e f).trans (sumCompl q))
#align equiv.subtype_congr Equiv.subtypeCongr
variable {p : ε → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
variable (ep ep' : Perm { a // p a }) (en en' : Perm { a // ¬p a })
/-- Combining permutations on `ε` that permute only inside or outside the subtype
split induced by `p : ε → Prop` constructs a permutation on `ε`. -/
def Perm.subtypeCongr : Equiv.Perm ε :=
permCongr (sumCompl p) (sumCongr ep en)
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.apply (a : ε) : ep.subtypeCongr en a =
if h : p a then (ep ⟨a, h⟩ : ε) else en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [Perm.subtypeCongr, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply {a : ε} (h : p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.left_apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype (a : { a // p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply ep en a.property
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.left_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply {a : ε} (h : ¬p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.right_apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype (a : { a // ¬p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply ep en a.property
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.right_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.refl :
Perm.subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl { a // p a }) (Equiv.refl { a // ¬p a }) = Equiv.refl ε := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x <;> simp [h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.refl Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.refl
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.symm : (ep.subtypeCongr en).symm = Perm.subtypeCongr ep.symm en.symm := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x
· have : p (ep.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
· have : ¬p (en.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en.symm _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.symm Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.symm
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.trans :
(ep.subtypeCongr en).trans (ep'.subtypeCongr en')
= Perm.subtypeCongr (ep.trans ep') (en.trans en') := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x
· have : p (ep ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, this]
· have : ¬p (en ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.trans Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.trans
end sumCompl
section subtypePreimage
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x₀ : { a // p a } → β)
/-- For a fixed function `x₀ : {a // p a} → β` defined on a subtype of `α`,
the subtype of functions `x : α → β` that agree with `x₀` on the subtype `{a // p a}`
is naturally equivalent to the type of functions `{a // ¬ p a} → β`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypePreimage : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ } ≃ ({ a // ¬p a } → β) where
toFun (x : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ }) a := (x : α → β) a
invFun x := ⟨fun a => if h : p a then x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ else x ⟨a, h⟩, funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ => dif_pos h⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
Subtype.val_injective <|
funext fun a => by
dsimp only
split_ifs
· rw [← hx]; rfl
· rfl
right_inv x :=
funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
show dite (p a) _ _ = _ by
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg h]
#align equiv.subtype_preimage Equiv.subtypePreimage
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_apply Equiv.subtypePreimage_apply
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_pos Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_neg Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg
end subtypePreimage
section
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `∀ a, β₁ a` and
`∀ a, β₂ a`. -/
def piCongrRight {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (∀ a, β₁ a) ≃ (∀ a, β₂ a) :=
⟨fun H a => F a (H a), fun H a => (F a).symm (H a), fun H => funext <| by simp,
fun H => funext <| by simp⟩
#align equiv.Pi_congr_right Equiv.piCongrRight
/-- Given `φ : α → β → Sort*`, we have an equivalence between `∀ a b, φ a b` and `∀ b a, φ a b`.
This is `Function.swap` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def piComm (φ : α → β → Sort*) : (∀ a b, φ a b) ≃ ∀ b a, φ a b :=
⟨swap, swap, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.Pi_comm Equiv.piComm
#align equiv.Pi_comm_apply Equiv.piComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem piComm_symm {φ : α → β → Sort*} : (piComm φ).symm = (piComm <| swap φ) :=
rfl
#align equiv.Pi_comm_symm Equiv.piComm_symm
/-- Dependent `curry` equivalence: the type of dependent functions on `Σ i, β i` is equivalent
to the type of dependent functions of two arguments (i.e., functions to the space of functions).
This is `Sigma.curry` and `Sigma.uncurry` together as an equiv. -/
def piCurry {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) :
(∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) ≃ ∀ a b, γ a b where
toFun := Sigma.curry
invFun := Sigma.uncurry
left_inv := Sigma.uncurry_curry
right_inv := Sigma.curry_uncurry
#align equiv.Pi_curry Equiv.piCurry
-- `simps` overapplies these but `simps (config := .asFn)` under-applies them
@[simp] theorem piCurry_apply {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*)
(f : ∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) :
piCurry γ f = Sigma.curry f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem piCurry_symm_apply {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) (f : ∀ a b, γ a b) :
(piCurry γ).symm f = Sigma.uncurry f :=
rfl
end
section prodCongr
variable (e : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂)
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `β₁ × α₁` and `β₂ × α₁`. -/
def prodCongrLeft : β₁ × α₁ ≃ β₂ × α₁ where
toFun ab := ⟨e ab.2 ab.1, ab.2⟩
invFun ab := ⟨(e ab.2).symm ab.1, ab.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_left Equiv.prodCongrLeft
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrLeft_apply (b : β₁) (a : α₁) : prodCongrLeft e (b, a) = (e a b, a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_left_apply Equiv.prodCongrLeft_apply
theorem prodCongr_refl_right (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prodCongr e (Equiv.refl α₁) = prodCongrLeft fun _ => e := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_refl_right Equiv.prodCongr_refl_right
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `α₁ × β₁` and `α₁ × β₂`. -/
def prodCongrRight : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₁ × β₂ where
toFun ab := ⟨ab.1, e ab.1 ab.2⟩
invFun ab := ⟨ab.1, (e ab.1).symm ab.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_right Equiv.prodCongrRight
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrRight_apply (a : α₁) (b : β₁) : prodCongrRight e (a, b) = (a, e a b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_right_apply Equiv.prodCongrRight_apply
theorem prodCongr_refl_left (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prodCongr (Equiv.refl α₁) e = prodCongrRight fun _ => e := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_refl_left Equiv.prodCongr_refl_left
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrLeft_trans_prodComm :
(prodCongrLeft e).trans (prodComm _ _) = (prodComm _ _).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_left_trans_prod_comm Equiv.prodCongrLeft_trans_prodComm
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrRight_trans_prodComm :
(prodCongrRight e).trans (prodComm _ _) = (prodComm _ _).trans (prodCongrLeft e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_right_trans_prod_comm Equiv.prodCongrRight_trans_prodComm
theorem sigmaCongrRight_sigmaEquivProd :
(sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂)
= (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.sigma_congr_right_sigma_equiv_prod Equiv.sigmaCongrRight_sigmaEquivProd
theorem sigmaEquivProd_sigmaCongrRight :
(sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).symm.trans (sigmaCongrRight e)
= (prodCongrRight e).trans (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂).symm := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp only [trans_apply, sigmaCongrRight_apply, prodCongrRight_apply]
rfl
#align equiv.sigma_equiv_prod_sigma_congr_right Equiv.sigmaEquivProd_sigmaCongrRight
-- See also `Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv`.
/-- A family of equivalences between fibers gives an equivalence between domains. -/
@[simps!]
def ofFiberEquiv {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) : α ≃ β :=
(sigmaFiberEquiv f).symm.trans <| (Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaFiberEquiv g)
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv Equiv.ofFiberEquiv
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_apply Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_apply
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_symm_apply Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_symm_apply
theorem ofFiberEquiv_map {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) (a : α) : g (ofFiberEquiv e a) = f a :=
(_ : { b // g b = _ }).property
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_map Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_map
/-- A variation on `Equiv.prodCongr` where the equivalence in the second component can depend
on the first component. A typical example is a shear mapping, explaining the name of this
declaration. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def prodShear (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ where
toFun := fun x : α₁ × β₁ => (e₁ x.1, e₂ x.1 x.2)
invFun := fun y : α₂ × β₂ => (e₁.symm y.1, (e₂ <| e₁.symm y.1).symm y.2)
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩
simp only [symm_apply_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩
simp only [apply_symm_apply]
#align equiv.prod_shear Equiv.prodShear
#align equiv.prod_shear_apply Equiv.prodShear_apply
#align equiv.prod_shear_symm_apply Equiv.prodShear_symm_apply
end prodCongr
namespace Perm
variable [DecidableEq α₁] (a : α₁) (e : Perm β₁)
/-- `prodExtendRight a e` extends `e : Perm β` to `Perm (α × β)` by sending `(a, b)` to
`(a, e b)` and keeping the other `(a', b)` fixed. -/
def prodExtendRight : Perm (α₁ × β₁) where
toFun ab := if ab.fst = a then (a, e ab.snd) else ab
invFun ab := if ab.fst = a then (a, e.symm ab.snd) else ab
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨k', x⟩
dsimp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [h₁]
· simp at h₂
· simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨k', x⟩
dsimp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [h₁]
· simp at h₂
· simp
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight
@[simp]
theorem prodExtendRight_apply_eq (b : β₁) : prodExtendRight a e (a, b) = (a, e b) :=
if_pos rfl
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right_apply_eq Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight_apply_eq
theorem prodExtendRight_apply_ne {a a' : α₁} (h : a' ≠ a) (b : β₁) :
prodExtendRight a e (a', b) = (a', b) :=
if_neg h
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right_apply_ne Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight_apply_ne
theorem eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne {e : Perm β₁} {a a' : α₁} {b : β₁}
(h : prodExtendRight a e (a', b) ≠ (a', b)) : a' = a := by
contrapose! h
exact prodExtendRight_apply_ne _ h _
#align equiv.perm.eq_of_prod_extend_right_ne Equiv.Perm.eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne
@[simp]
theorem fst_prodExtendRight (ab : α₁ × β₁) : (prodExtendRight a e ab).fst = ab.fst := by
rw [prodExtendRight]
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
· rfl
#align equiv.perm.fst_prod_extend_right Equiv.Perm.fst_prodExtendRight
end Perm
section
/-- The type of functions to a product `α × β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
`γ → α` and `γ → β`. -/
def arrowProdEquivProdArrow (α β γ : Type*) : (γ → α × β) ≃ (γ → α) × (γ → β) where
toFun := fun f => (fun c => (f c).1, fun c => (f c).2)
invFun := fun p c => (p.1 c, p.2 c)
left_inv := fun f => rfl
right_inv := fun p => by cases p; rfl
#align equiv.arrow_prod_equiv_prod_arrow Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow
open Sum
/-- The type of dependent functions on a sum type `ι ⊕ ι'` is equivalent to the type of pairs of
functions on `ι` and on `ι'`. This is a dependent version of `Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow`. -/
@[simps]
def sumPiEquivProdPi (π : ι ⊕ ι' → Type*) : (∀ i, π i) ≃ (∀ i, π (inl i)) × ∀ i', π (inr i') where
toFun f := ⟨fun i => f (inl i), fun i' => f (inr i')⟩
invFun g := Sum.rec g.1 g.2
left_inv f := by ext (i | i) <;> rfl
right_inv g := Prod.ext rfl rfl
/-- The equivalence between a product of two dependent functions types and a single dependent
function type. Basically a symmetric version of `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
@[simps!]
def prodPiEquivSumPi (π : ι → Type u) (π' : ι' → Type u) :
((∀ i, π i) × ∀ i', π' i') ≃ ∀ i, Sum.elim π π' i :=
sumPiEquivProdPi (Sum.elim π π') |>.symm
/-- The type of functions on a sum type `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
on `α` and on `β`. -/
def sumArrowEquivProdArrow (α β γ : Type*) : (Sum α β → γ) ≃ (α → γ) × (β → γ) :=
⟨fun f => (f ∘ inl, f ∘ inr), fun p => Sum.elim p.1 p.2, fun f => by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl, fun p => by
cases p
rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_fst (f : Sum α β → γ) (a : α) :
(sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ f).1 a = f (inl a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_apply_fst Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_fst
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_snd (f : Sum α β → γ) (b : β) :
(sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ f).2 b = f (inr b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_apply_snd Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_snd
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inl (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) (a : α) :
((sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ).symm (f, g)) (inl a) = f a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inl Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inr (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) (b : β) :
((sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ).symm (f, g)) (inr b) = g b :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inr Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inr
/-- Type product is right distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def sumProdDistrib (α β γ) : Sum α β × γ ≃ Sum (α × γ) (β × γ) :=
⟨fun p => p.1.map (fun x => (x, p.2)) fun x => (x, p.2),
fun s => s.elim (Prod.map inl id) (Prod.map inr id), by
rintro ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl, by rintro (⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib Equiv.sumProdDistrib
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_apply_left (a : α) (c : γ) :
sumProdDistrib α β γ (Sum.inl a, c) = Sum.inl (a, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_apply_left Equiv.sumProdDistrib_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_apply_right (b : β) (c : γ) :
sumProdDistrib α β γ (Sum.inr b, c) = Sum.inr (b, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_apply_right Equiv.sumProdDistrib_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_left (a : α × γ) :
(sumProdDistrib α β γ).symm (inl a) = (inl a.1, a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_symm_apply_left Equiv.sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_right (b : β × γ) :
(sumProdDistrib α β γ).symm (inr b) = (inr b.1, b.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_symm_apply_right Equiv.sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_right
/-- Type product is left distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def prodSumDistrib (α β γ) : α × Sum β γ ≃ Sum (α × β) (α × γ) :=
calc
α × Sum β γ ≃ Sum β γ × α := prodComm _ _
_ ≃ Sum (β × α) (γ × α) := sumProdDistrib _ _ _
_ ≃ Sum (α × β) (α × γ) := sumCongr (prodComm _ _) (prodComm _ _)
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib Equiv.prodSumDistrib
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_apply_left (a : α) (b : β) :
prodSumDistrib α β γ (a, Sum.inl b) = Sum.inl (a, b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_apply_left Equiv.prodSumDistrib_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_apply_right (a : α) (c : γ) :
prodSumDistrib α β γ (a, Sum.inr c) = Sum.inr (a, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_apply_right Equiv.prodSumDistrib_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_left (a : α × β) :
(prodSumDistrib α β γ).symm (inl a) = (a.1, inl a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_symm_apply_left Equiv.prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_right (a : α × γ) :
(prodSumDistrib α β γ).symm (inr a) = (a.1, inr a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_symm_apply_right Equiv.prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_right
/-- An indexed sum of disjoint sums of types is equivalent to the sum of the indexed sums. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaSumDistrib (α β : ι → Type*) :
(Σ i, Sum (α i) (β i)) ≃ Sum (Σ i, α i) (Σ i, β i) :=
⟨fun p => p.2.map (Sigma.mk p.1) (Sigma.mk p.1),
Sum.elim (Sigma.map id fun _ => Sum.inl) (Sigma.map id fun _ => Sum.inr), fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨i, a | b⟩ <;> rfl, fun p => by rcases p with (⟨i, a⟩ | ⟨i, b⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib_apply Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib_apply
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib_symm_apply Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib_symm_apply
/-- The product of an indexed sum of types (formally, a `Sigma`-type `Σ i, α i`) by a type `β` is
equivalent to the sum of products `Σ i, (α i × β)`. -/
def sigmaProdDistrib (α : ι → Type*) (β : Type*) : (Σ i, α i) × β ≃ Σ i, α i × β :=
⟨fun p => ⟨p.1.1, (p.1.2, p.2)⟩, fun p => (⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩, p.2.2), fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩
rfl, fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩⟩
rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_prod_distrib Equiv.sigmaProdDistrib
/-- An equivalence that separates out the 0th fiber of `(Σ (n : ℕ), f n)`. -/
def sigmaNatSucc (f : ℕ → Type u) : (Σ n, f n) ≃ Sum (f 0) (Σ n, f (n + 1)) :=
⟨fun x =>
@Sigma.casesOn ℕ f (fun _ => Sum (f 0) (Σn, f (n + 1))) x fun n =>
@Nat.casesOn (fun i => f i → Sum (f 0) (Σn : ℕ, f (n + 1))) n (fun x : f 0 => Sum.inl x)
fun (n : ℕ) (x : f n.succ) => Sum.inr ⟨n, x⟩,
Sum.elim (Sigma.mk 0) (Sigma.map Nat.succ fun _ => id), by rintro ⟨n | n, x⟩ <;> rfl, by
rintro (x | ⟨n, x⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_nat_succ Equiv.sigmaNatSucc
/-- The product `Bool × α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ α`. -/
@[simps]
def boolProdEquivSum (α) : Bool × α ≃ Sum α α where
toFun p := p.1.casesOn (inl p.2) (inr p.2)
invFun := Sum.elim (Prod.mk false) (Prod.mk true)
left_inv := by rintro ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum Equiv.boolProdEquivSum
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum_apply Equiv.boolProdEquivSum_apply
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum_symm_apply Equiv.boolProdEquivSum_symm_apply
/-- The function type `Bool → α` is equivalent to `α × α`. -/
@[simps]
def boolArrowEquivProd (α) : (Bool → α) ≃ α × α where
toFun f := (f false, f true)
invFun p b := b.casesOn p.1 p.2
left_inv _ := funext <| Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
right_inv := fun _ => rfl
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd_apply
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd_symm_apply
end
section
open Sum Nat
/-- The set of natural numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ PUnit`. -/
def natEquivNatSumPUnit : ℕ ≃ Sum ℕ PUnit where
toFun n := Nat.casesOn n (inr PUnit.unit) inl
invFun := Sum.elim Nat.succ fun _ => 0
left_inv n := by cases n <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
#align equiv.nat_equiv_nat_sum_punit Equiv.natEquivNatSumPUnit
/-- `ℕ ⊕ PUnit` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def natSumPUnitEquivNat : Sum ℕ PUnit ≃ ℕ :=
natEquivNatSumPUnit.symm
#align equiv.nat_sum_punit_equiv_nat Equiv.natSumPUnitEquivNat
/-- The type of integer numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ ℕ`. -/
def intEquivNatSumNat : ℤ ≃ Sum ℕ ℕ where
toFun z := Int.casesOn z inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim Int.ofNat Int.negSucc
left_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
#align equiv.int_equiv_nat_sum_nat Equiv.intEquivNatSumNat
end
/-- An equivalence between `α` and `β` generates an equivalence between `List α` and `List β`. -/
def listEquivOfEquiv (e : α ≃ β) : List α ≃ List β where
toFun := List.map e
invFun := List.map e.symm
left_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.symm_comp_self, List.map_id]
right_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.self_comp_symm, List.map_id]
#align equiv.list_equiv_of_equiv Equiv.listEquivOfEquiv
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Unique α` is equivalent to `Unique β`. -/
def uniqueCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α ≃ Unique β where
toFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e.symm
invFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align equiv.unique_congr Equiv.uniqueCongr
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `IsEmpty α` is equivalent to `IsEmpty β`. -/
theorem isEmpty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : IsEmpty α ↔ IsEmpty β :=
⟨fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e.symm, fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e⟩
#align equiv.is_empty_congr Equiv.isEmpty_congr
protected theorem isEmpty (e : α ≃ β) [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty α :=
e.isEmpty_congr.mpr ‹_›
#align equiv.is_empty Equiv.isEmpty
section
open Subtype
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and the predicates `p : α → Prop` and `q : β → Prop` are equivalent
at corresponding points, then `{a // p a}` is equivalent to `{b // q b}`.
For the statement where `α = β`, that is, `e : perm α`, see `Perm.subtypePerm`. -/
def subtypeEquiv {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // q b } where
toFun a := ⟨e a, (h _).mp a.property⟩
invFun b := ⟨e.symm b, (h _).mpr ((e.apply_symm_apply b).symm ▸ b.property)⟩
left_inv a := Subtype.ext <| by simp
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| by simp
#align equiv.subtype_equiv Equiv.subtypeEquiv
lemma coe_subtypeEquiv_eq_map {X Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} (e : X ≃ Y)
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (e x)) : ⇑(e.subtypeEquiv h) = Subtype.map e (h · |>.mp) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_refl {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ p (Equiv.refl _ a) := fun a => Iff.rfl) :
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv h = Equiv.refl { a : α // p a } := by
ext
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_refl Equiv.subtypeEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_symm {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).symm =
e.symm.subtypeEquiv fun a => by
convert (h <| e.symm a).symm
exact (e.apply_symm_apply a).symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_symm Equiv.subtypeEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_trans {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ)
(h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (h' : ∀ b : β, q b ↔ r (f b)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).trans (f.subtypeEquiv h')
= (e.trans f).subtypeEquiv fun a => (h a).trans (h' <| e a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_trans Equiv.subtypeEquiv_trans
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_apply {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (x : { x // p x }) :
e.subtypeEquiv h x = ⟨e x, (h _).1 x.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_apply Equiv.subtypeEquiv_apply
/-- If two predicates `p` and `q` are pointwise equivalent, then `{x // p x}` is equivalent to
`{x // q x}`. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeEquivRight {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x) : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x } :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl _) e
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right Equiv.subtypeEquivRight
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeEquivRight_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right_symm_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply_coe
lemma subtypeEquivRight_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // p x }) : subtypeEquivRight e z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mp z.2⟩ := rfl
lemma subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // q x }) : (subtypeEquivRight e).symm z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mpr z.2⟩ := rfl
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : β → Prop` the subtype `{a // p (e a)}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p b}`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype {p : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) : { a : α // p (e a) } ≃ { b : β // p b } :=
subtypeEquiv e <| by simp
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype Equiv.subtypeEquivOfSubtype
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : α → Prop` the subtype `{a // p a}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p (e.symm b)}`. This version is used by `equiv_rw`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype' {p : α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // p (e.symm b) } :=
e.symm.subtypeEquivOfSubtype.symm
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype' Equiv.subtypeEquivOfSubtype'
/-- If two predicates are equal, then the corresponding subtypes are equivalent. -/
def subtypeEquivProp {p q : α → Prop} (h : p = q) : Subtype p ≃ Subtype q :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl α) fun _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_prop Equiv.subtypeEquivProp
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. This
version allows the “inner” predicate to depend on `h : p a`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists (p : α → Prop) (q : Subtype p → Prop) :
Subtype q ≃ { a : α // ∃ h : p a, q ⟨a, h⟩ } :=
⟨fun a =>
⟨a.1, a.1.2, by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a, hap⟩, haq⟩
exact haq⟩,
fun a => ⟨⟨a, a.2.fst⟩, a.2.snd⟩, fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists_symm_apply_coe_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists_apply_coe
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter {α : Type u} (p q : α → Prop) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists p _).trans <|
subtypeEquivRight fun x => @exists_prop (q x) (p x)
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter_symm_apply_coe_coe
/-- If the outer subtype has more restrictive predicate than the inner one,
then we can drop the latter. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ {x}, q x → p x) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype q :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter p _).trans <| subtypeEquivRight fun _ => and_iff_right_of_imp h
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype_symm_apply_coe_coe
/-- If a proposition holds for all elements, then the subtype is
equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def subtypeUnivEquiv {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) : Subtype p ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => ⟨x, h x⟩, fun _ => Subtype.eq rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv_apply Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv_apply
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv_symm_apply Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv_symm_apply
/-- A subtype of a sigma-type is a sigma-type over a subtype. -/
def subtypeSigmaEquiv (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) : { y : Sigma p // q y.1 } ≃ Σ x :
Subtype q, p x.1 :=
⟨fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun _ => rfl,
fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_sigma_equiv Equiv.subtypeSigmaEquiv
/-- A sigma type over a subtype is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty outside of the subset -/
def sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(Σ x : Subtype q, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p x :=
(subtypeSigmaEquiv p q).symm.trans <| subtypeUnivEquiv fun x => h x.1 x.2
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_equiv_of_subset Equiv.sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset
/-- If a predicate `p : β → Prop` is true on the range of a map `f : α → β`, then
`Σ y : {y // p y}, {x // f x = y}` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (p : β → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
(Σ y : Subtype p, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
calc
_ ≃ Σy : β, { x : α // f x = y } := sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ p fun _ ⟨x, h'⟩ => h' ▸ h x
_ ≃ α := sigmaFiberEquiv f
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_fiber_equiv Equiv.sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv
/-- If for each `x` we have `p x ↔ q (f x)`, then `Σ y : {y // q y}, f ⁻¹' {y}` is equivalent
to `{x // p x}`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (f x)) : (Σ y : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Subtype p :=
calc
(Σy : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Σy :
Subtype q, { x : Subtype p // Subtype.mk (f x) ((h x).1 x.2) = y } := by {
apply sigmaCongrRight
intro y
apply Equiv.symm
refine (subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists _ _).trans (subtypeEquivRight ?_)
intro x
exact ⟨fun ⟨hp, h'⟩ => congr_arg Subtype.val h', fun h' => ⟨(h x).2 (h'.symm ▸ y.2),
Subtype.eq h'⟩⟩ }
_ ≃ Subtype p := sigmaFiberEquiv fun x : Subtype p => (⟨f x, (h x).1 x.property⟩ : Subtype q)
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_fiber_equiv_subtype Equiv.sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype
/-- A sigma type over an `Option` is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty at none. -/
def sigmaOptionEquivOfSome (p : Option α → Type v) (h : p none → False) :
(Σ x : Option α, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p (some x) :=
haveI h' : ∀ x, p x → x.isSome := by
intro x
cases x
· intro n
exfalso
exact h n
· intro _
exact rfl
(sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ _ h').symm.trans (sigmaCongrLeft' (optionIsSomeEquiv α))
#align equiv.sigma_option_equiv_of_some Equiv.sigmaOptionEquivOfSome
/-- The `Pi`-type `∀ i, π i` is equivalent to the type of sections `f : ι → Σ i, π i` of the
`Sigma` type such that for all `i` we have `(f i).fst = i`. -/
def piEquivSubtypeSigma (ι) (π : ι → Type*) :
(∀ i, π i) ≃ { f : ι → Σ i, π i // ∀ i, (f i).1 = i } where
toFun := fun f => ⟨fun i => ⟨i, f i⟩, fun i => rfl⟩
invFun := fun f i => by rw [← f.2 i]; exact (f.1 i).2
left_inv := fun f => funext fun i => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| funext fun i =>
Sigma.eq (hf i).symm <| eq_of_heq <| rec_heq_of_heq _ <| by simp
#align equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma Equiv.piEquivSubtypeSigma
/-- The type of functions `f : ∀ a, β a` such that for all `a` we have `p a (f a)` is equivalent
to the type of functions `∀ a, {b : β a // p a b}`. -/
def subtypePiEquivPi {β : α → Sort v} {p : ∀ a, β a → Prop} :
{ f : ∀ a, β a // ∀ a, p a (f a) } ≃ ∀ a, { b : β a // p a b } where
toFun := fun f a => ⟨f.1 a, f.2 a⟩
invFun := fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).1, fun a => (f a).2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, h⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro f
funext a
exact Subtype.ext_val rfl
#align equiv.subtype_pi_equiv_pi Equiv.subtypePiEquivPi
/-- A subtype of a product defined by componentwise conditions
is equivalent to a product of subtypes. -/
def subtypeProdEquivProd {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
{ c : α × β // p c.1 ∧ q c.2 } ≃ { a // p a } × { b // q b } where
toFun := fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩
invFun := fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_prod_equiv_prod Equiv.subtypeProdEquivProd
/-- A subtype of a `Prod` that depends only on the first component is equivalent to the
corresponding subtype of the first type times the second type. -/
def prodSubtypeFstEquivSubtypeProd {p : α → Prop} : {s : α × β // p s.1} ≃ {a // p a} × β where
toFun x := ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- A subtype of a `Prod` is equivalent to a sigma type whose fibers are subtypes. -/
def subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype (p : α → β → Prop) :
{ x : α × β // p x.1 x.2 } ≃ Σa, { b : β // p a b } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, x.property⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1, x.2⟩, x.2.property⟩
left_inv x := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨a, b, pab⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_prod_equiv_sigma_subtype Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype
/-- The type `∀ (i : α), β i` can be split as a product by separating the indices in `α`
depending on whether they satisfy a predicate `p` or not. -/
@[simps]
def piEquivPiSubtypeProd {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (β : α → Type*) [DecidablePred p] :
(∀ i : α, β i) ≃ (∀ i : { x // p x }, β i) × ∀ i : { x // ¬p x }, β i where
toFun f := (fun x => f x, fun x => f x)
invFun f x := if h : p x then f.1 ⟨x, h⟩ else f.2 ⟨x, h⟩
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, g⟩
ext1 <;>
· ext y
rcases y with ⟨val, property⟩
simp only [property, dif_pos, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
left_inv f := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x <;>
· simp only [h, dif_neg, dif_pos, not_false_iff]
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_apply Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_apply Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd_apply
/-- A product of types can be split as the binary product of one of the types and the product
of all the remaining types. -/
@[simps]
def piSplitAt {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (β : α → Type*) :
(∀ j, β j) ≃ β i × ∀ j : { j // j ≠ i }, β j where
toFun f := ⟨f i, fun j => f j⟩
invFun f j := if h : j = i then h.symm.rec f.1 else f.2 ⟨j, h⟩
right_inv f := by
ext x
exacts [dif_pos rfl, (dif_neg x.2).trans (by cases x; rfl)]
left_inv f := by
ext x
dsimp only
split_ifs with h
· subst h; rfl
· rfl
#align equiv.pi_split_at Equiv.piSplitAt
#align equiv.pi_split_at_apply Equiv.piSplitAt_apply
#align equiv.pi_split_at_symm_apply Equiv.piSplitAt_symm_apply
/-- A product of copies of a type can be split as the binary product of one copy and the product
of all the remaining copies. -/
@[simps!]
def funSplitAt {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (β : Type*) :
(α → β) ≃ β × ({ j // j ≠ i } → β) :=
piSplitAt i _
#align equiv.fun_split_at Equiv.funSplitAt
#align equiv.fun_split_at_symm_apply Equiv.funSplitAt_symm_apply
#align equiv.fun_split_at_apply Equiv.funSplitAt_apply
end
section subtypeEquivCodomain
variable [DecidableEq X] {x : X}
/-- The type of all functions `X → Y` with prescribed values for all `x' ≠ x`
is equivalent to the codomain `Y`. -/
def subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
{ g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } ≃ Y :=
(subtypePreimage _ f).trans <|
@funUnique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } _ <|
show Unique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } from
@Equiv.unique _ _
(show Unique { x' // x' = x } from {
default := ⟨x, rfl⟩, uniq := fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.val_injective h })
(subtypeEquivRight fun _ => not_not)
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
(subtypeEquivCodomain f : _ → Y) =
fun g : { g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } => (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_subtype_equiv_codomain Equiv.coe_subtypeEquivCodomain
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (g) :
subtypeEquivCodomain f g = (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_apply Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_apply
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm : Y → _) = fun y =>
⟨fun x' => if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y, by
funext x'
simp only [ne_eq, dite_not, comp_apply, Subtype.coe_eta, dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro w
exfalso
exact x'.property w⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_subtype_equiv_codomain_symm Equiv.coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x = y :=
dif_neg (not_not.mpr rfl)
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_eq Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
(f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) (h : x' ≠ x) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = f ⟨x', h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_ne Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
end subtypeEquivCodomain
instance : CanLift (α → β) (α ≃ β) (↑) Bijective where prf f hf := ⟨ofBijective f hf, rfl⟩
section
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : Perm α') {p : β' → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α' ≃ Subtype p)
/-- Extend the domain of `e : Equiv.Perm α` to one that is over `β` via `f : α → Subtype p`,
where `p : β → Prop`, permuting only the `b : β` that satisfy `p b`.
This can be used to extend the domain across a function `f : α → β`,
keeping everything outside of `Set.range f` fixed. For this use-case `Equiv` given by `f` can
be constructed by `Equiv.of_leftInverse'` or `Equiv.of_leftInverse` when there is a known
inverse, or `Equiv.ofInjective` in the general case.
-/
def Perm.extendDomain : Perm β' :=
(permCongr f e).subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl _)
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain Equiv.Perm.extendDomain
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_image (a : α') : e.extendDomain f (f a) = f (e a) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_image Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_image
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype {b : β'} (h : p b) :
e.extendDomain f b = f (e (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩)) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype {b : β'} (h : ¬p b) : e.extendDomain f b = b := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_not_subtype Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_refl : Perm.extendDomain (Equiv.refl _) f = Equiv.refl _ := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_refl Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_refl
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_symm : (e.extendDomain f).symm = Perm.extendDomain e.symm f :=
rfl
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_symm Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_symm
theorem Perm.extendDomain_trans (e e' : Perm α') :
(e.extendDomain f).trans (e'.extendDomain f) = Perm.extendDomain (e.trans e') f := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, permCongr_trans]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_trans Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_trans
end
/-- Subtype of the quotient is equivalent to the quotient of the subtype. Let `α` be a setoid with
equivalence relation `~`. Let `p₂` be a predicate on the quotient type `α/~`, and `p₁` be the lift
of this predicate to `α`: `p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧`. Let `~₂` be the restriction of `~` to `{x // p₁ x}`.
Then `{x // p₂ x}` is equivalent to the quotient of `{x // p₁ x}` by `~₂`. -/
def subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype (p₁ : α → Prop) {s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)}
(p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂.r x y ↔ s₁.r x y) : {x // p₂ x} ≃ Quotient s₂ where
toFun a :=
Quotient.hrecOn a.1 (fun a h => ⟦⟨a, (hp₂ _).2 h⟩⟧)
(fun a b hab => hfunext (by rw [Quotient.sound hab]) fun h₁ h₂ _ =>
heq_of_eq (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).2 hab)))
a.2
invFun a :=
Quotient.liftOn a (fun a => (⟨⟦a.1⟧, (hp₂ _).1 a.2⟩ : { x // p₂ x })) fun a b hab =>
Subtype.ext_val (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).1 hab))
left_inv := by exact fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn a (fun b hb => rfl) ha
right_inv a := Quotient.inductionOn a fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, @Setoid.r _ s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y)
(x hx) : subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h ⟨⟦x⟧, hx⟩ = ⟦⟨x, (hp₂ _).2 hx⟩⟧ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype_mk Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, @Setoid.r _ s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y) (x) :
(subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h).symm ⟦x⟧ = ⟨⟦x⟧, (hp₂ _).1 x.property⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype_symm_mk Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- A helper function for `Equiv.swap`. -/
def swapCore (a b r : α) : α :=
if r = a then b else if r = b then a else r
#align equiv.swap_core Equiv.swapCore
theorem swapCore_self (r a : α) : swapCore a a r = r := by
unfold swapCore
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
#align equiv.swap_core_self Equiv.swapCore_self
theorem swapCore_swapCore (r a b : α) : swapCore a b (swapCore a b r) = r := by
unfold swapCore
-- Porting note: cc missing.
-- `casesm` would work here, with `casesm _ = _, ¬ _ = _`,
-- if it would just continue past failures on hypotheses matching the pattern
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅
· subst h₁; exact h₂
· subst h₁; rfl
· cases h₃ rfl
· exact h₄.symm
· cases h₅ rfl
· cases h₅ rfl
· rfl
#align equiv.swap_core_swap_core Equiv.swapCore_swapCore
theorem swapCore_comm (r a b : α) : swapCore a b r = swapCore b a r := by
unfold swapCore
-- Porting note: whatever solution works for `swapCore_swapCore` will work here too.
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ <;> try simp
· cases h₁; cases h₂; rfl
#align equiv.swap_core_comm Equiv.swapCore_comm
/-- `swap a b` is the permutation that swaps `a` and `b` and
leaves other values as is. -/
def swap (a b : α) : Perm α :=
⟨swapCore a b, swapCore a b, fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b,
fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b⟩
#align equiv.swap Equiv.swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_self (a : α) : swap a a = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun r => swapCore_self r a
#align equiv.swap_self Equiv.swap_self
theorem swap_comm (a b : α) : swap a b = swap b a :=
ext fun r => swapCore_comm r _ _
#align equiv.swap_comm Equiv.swap_comm
theorem swap_apply_def (a b x : α) : swap a b x = if x = a then b else if x = b then a else x :=
rfl
#align equiv.swap_apply_def Equiv.swap_apply_def
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_left (a b : α) : swap a b a = b :=
if_pos rfl
#align equiv.swap_apply_left Equiv.swap_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_right (a b : α) : swap a b b = a := by
by_cases h:b = a <;> simp [swap_apply_def, h]
#align equiv.swap_apply_right Equiv.swap_apply_right
theorem swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne {a b x : α} : x ≠ a → x ≠ b → swap a b x = x := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [swap_apply_def]
#align equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne
theorem eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self {a b x : α} (h : swap a b x ≠ x) : x = a ∨ x = b := by
contrapose! h
exact swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h.1 h.2
@[simp]
theorem swap_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).trans (swap a b) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun _ => swapCore_swapCore _ _ _
#align equiv.swap_swap Equiv.swap_swap
@[simp]
theorem symm_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).symm = swap a b :=
rfl
#align equiv.symm_swap Equiv.symm_swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_eq_refl_iff {x y : α} : swap x y = Equiv.refl _ ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => (Equiv.refl _).injective ?_, fun h => h ▸ swap_self _⟩
rw [← h, swap_apply_left, h, refl_apply]
#align equiv.swap_eq_refl_iff Equiv.swap_eq_refl_iff
theorem swap_comp_apply {a b x : α} (π : Perm α) :
π.trans (swap a b) x = if π x = a then b else if π x = b then a else π x := by
cases π
rfl
#align equiv.swap_comp_apply Equiv.swap_comp_apply
theorem swap_eq_update (i j : α) : (Equiv.swap i j : α → α) = update (update id j i) i j :=
funext fun x => by rw [update_apply _ i j, update_apply _ j i, Equiv.swap_apply_def, id]
#align equiv.swap_eq_update Equiv.swap_eq_update
theorem comp_swap_eq_update (i j : α) (f : α → β) :
f ∘ Equiv.swap i j = update (update f j (f i)) i (f j) := by
rw [swap_eq_update, comp_update, comp_update, comp_id]
#align equiv.comp_swap_eq_update Equiv.comp_swap_eq_update
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_swap_trans [DecidableEq β] (a b : α) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.symm.trans (swap a b)).trans e = swap (e a) (e b) :=
Equiv.ext fun x => by
have : ∀ a, e.symm x = a ↔ x = e a := fun a => by
rw [@eq_comm _ (e.symm x)]
constructor <;> intros <;> simp_all
simp only [trans_apply, swap_apply_def, this]
split_ifs <;> simp
#align equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans
@[simp]
theorem trans_swap_trans_symm [DecidableEq β] (a b : β) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.trans (swap a b)).trans e.symm = swap (e.symm a) (e.symm b) :=
symm_trans_swap_trans a b e.symm
#align equiv.trans_swap_trans_symm Equiv.trans_swap_trans_symm
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_self (i j a : α) : swap i j (swap i j a) = a := by
rw [← Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.swap_swap, Equiv.refl_apply]
#align equiv.swap_apply_self Equiv.swap_apply_self
/-- A function is invariant to a swap if it is equal at both elements -/
theorem apply_swap_eq_self {v : α → β} {i j : α} (hv : v i = v j) (k : α) :
v (swap i j k) = v k := by
by_cases hi : k = i
· rw [hi, swap_apply_left, hv]
by_cases hj : k = j
· rw [hj, swap_apply_right, hv]
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hi hj]
#align equiv.apply_swap_eq_self Equiv.apply_swap_eq_self
theorem swap_apply_eq_iff {x y z w : α} : swap x y z = w ↔ z = swap x y w := by
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, symm_swap]
#align equiv.swap_apply_eq_iff Equiv.swap_apply_eq_iff
theorem swap_apply_ne_self_iff {a b x : α} : swap a b x ≠ x ↔ a ≠ b ∧ (x = a ∨ x = b) := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
by_cases hax : x = a
· simp [hax, eq_comm]
by_cases hbx : x = b
· simp [hbx]
simp [hab, hax, hbx, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
#align equiv.swap_apply_ne_self_iff Equiv.swap_apply_ne_self_iff
namespace Perm
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_swap_refl {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : α) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.swap i j) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inl, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inl.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_swap_refl Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_swap_refl
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_refl_swap {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : β) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.swap i j) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inr, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inr.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_refl_swap Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_refl_swap
end Perm
/-- Augment an equivalence with a prescribed mapping `f a = b` -/
def setValue (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : α ≃ β :=
(swap a (f.symm b)).trans f
#align equiv.set_value Equiv.setValue
@[simp]
theorem setValue_eq (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : setValue f a b a = b := by
simp [setValue, swap_apply_left]
#align equiv.set_value_eq Equiv.setValue_eq
end Swap
end Equiv
namespace Function.Involutive
/-- Convert an involutive function `f` to a permutation with `toFun = invFun = f`. -/
def toPerm (f : α → α) (h : Involutive f) : Equiv.Perm α :=
⟨f, f, h.leftInverse, h.rightInverse⟩
#align function.involutive.to_perm Function.Involutive.toPerm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toPerm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f : α → α) = f :=
rfl
#align function.involutive.coe_to_perm Function.Involutive.coe_toPerm
@[simp]
theorem toPerm_symm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f).symm = h.toPerm f :=
rfl
#align function.involutive.to_perm_symm Function.Involutive.toPerm_symm
theorem toPerm_involutive {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : Involutive (h.toPerm f) :=
h
#align function.involutive.to_perm_involutive Function.Involutive.toPerm_involutive
end Function.Involutive
theorem PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq {x : PLift α} {y : α} : x = PLift.up y ↔ x.down = y :=
Equiv.plift.eq_symm_apply
#align plift.eq_up_iff_down_eq PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq
theorem Function.Injective.map_swap [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (x y z : α) :
f (Equiv.swap x y z) = Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
conv_rhs => rw [Equiv.swap_apply_def]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [hf h₁, Equiv.swap_apply_left]
· rw [hf h₂, Equiv.swap_apply_right]
· rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (mt (congr_arg f) h₁) (mt (congr_arg f) h₂)]
#align function.injective.map_swap Function.Injective.map_swap
namespace Equiv
section
variable (P : α → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/-- Transport dependent functions through an equivalence of the base space.
-/
@[simps]
def piCongrLeft' (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) : (∀ a, P a) ≃ ∀ b, P (e.symm b) where
toFun f x := f (e.symm x)
invFun f x := (e.symm_apply_apply x).ndrec (f (e x))
left_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), h.ndrec (f y) = f x) (e.symm_apply_apply x)
right_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), (congr_arg e.symm h).ndrec (f y) = f x)
(e.apply_symm_apply x)
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left' Equiv.piCongrLeft'
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left'_apply Equiv.piCongrLeft'_apply
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left'_symm_apply Equiv.piCongrLeft'_symm_apply
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e.symm (e a) = a` in the statement of this lemma. -/
add_decl_doc Equiv.piCongrLeft'_symm_apply
/-- This lemma is impractical to state in the dependent case. -/
@[simp]
theorem piCongrLeft'_symm (P : Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) :
(piCongrLeft' (fun _ => P) e).symm = piCongrLeft' _ e.symm := by ext; simp [piCongrLeft']
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `a` is of the form `e.symm b`, so we can use `g b` instead of
`g (e (e.symm b))`. -/
lemma piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) (g : ∀ b, P (e.symm b)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g (e.symm b) = g b := by
change Eq.ndrec _ _ = _
generalize_proofs hZa
revert hZa
rw [e.apply_symm_apply b]
simp
end
section
variable (P : β → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/-- Transporting dependent functions through an equivalence of the base,
expressed as a "simplification".
-/
def piCongrLeft : (∀ a, P (e a)) ≃ ∀ b, P b :=
(piCongrLeft' P e.symm).symm
#align equiv.Pi_congr_left Equiv.piCongrLeft
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e (e.symm b) = b` in the statement of this lemma. -/
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f b = e.apply_symm_apply b ▸ f (e.symm b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_symm_apply (g : ∀ b, P b) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e).symm g a = g (e a) :=
piCongrLeft'_apply P e.symm g a
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `b` is of the form `e a`, so we can use `f a` instead of
`f (e.symm (e a))`. -/
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f (e a) = f a :=
piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply P e.symm f a
open Sum
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast {P : β → Sort v} {e : α ≃ β}
(f : (a : α) → P (e a)) (b : β) :
piCongrLeft P e f b = cast (congr_arg P (e.apply_symm_apply b)) (f (e.symm b)) :=
Eq.rec_eq_cast _ _
theorem piCongrLeft_sum_inl (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (i : ι) :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inl i)) = f i := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inl i)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
theorem piCongrLeft_sum_inr (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (j : ι') :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inr j)) = g j := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inr j)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
end
section
variable {W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : ∀ a : α, W a ≃ Z (h₁ a))
/-- Transport dependent functions through
an equivalence of the base spaces and a family
of equivalences of the matching fibers.
-/
def piCongr : (∀ a, W a) ≃ ∀ b, Z b :=
(Equiv.piCongrRight h₂).trans (Equiv.piCongrLeft _ h₁)
#align equiv.Pi_congr Equiv.piCongr
@[simp]
theorem coe_piCongr_symm : ((h₁.piCongr h₂).symm :
(∀ b, Z b) → ∀ a, W a) = fun f a => (h₂ a).symm (f (h₁ a)) :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_Pi_congr_symm Equiv.coe_piCongr_symm
theorem piCongr_symm_apply (f : ∀ b, Z b) :
(h₁.piCongr h₂).symm f = fun a => (h₂ a).symm (f (h₁ a)) :=
rfl
#align equiv.Pi_congr_symm_apply Equiv.piCongr_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem piCongr_apply_apply (f : ∀ a, W a) (a : α) : h₁.piCongr h₂ f (h₁ a) = h₂ a (f a) := by
simp only [piCongr, piCongrRight, trans_apply, coe_fn_mk, piCongrLeft_apply_apply]
#align equiv.Pi_congr_apply_apply Equiv.piCongr_apply_apply
end
section
variable {W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : ∀ b : β, W (h₁.symm b) ≃ Z b)
/-- Transport dependent functions through
an equivalence of the base spaces and a family
of equivalences of the matching fibres.
-/
def piCongr' : (∀ a, W a) ≃ ∀ b, Z b :=
(piCongr h₁.symm fun b => (h₂ b).symm).symm
#align equiv.Pi_congr' Equiv.piCongr'
@[simp]
theorem coe_piCongr' :
(h₁.piCongr' h₂ : (∀ a, W a) → ∀ b, Z b) = fun f b => h₂ b <| f <| h₁.symm b :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_Pi_congr' Equiv.coe_piCongr'
theorem piCongr'_apply (f : ∀ a, W a) : h₁.piCongr' h₂ f = fun b => h₂ b <| f <| h₁.symm b :=
rfl
#align equiv.Pi_congr'_apply Equiv.piCongr'_apply
@[simp]
theorem piCongr'_symm_apply_symm_apply (f : ∀ b, Z b) (b : β) :
(h₁.piCongr' h₂).symm f (h₁.symm b) = (h₂ b).symm (f b) := by
simp [piCongr', piCongr_apply_apply]
#align equiv.Pi_congr'_symm_apply_symm_apply Equiv.piCongr'_symm_apply_symm_apply
end
section BinaryOp
variable (e : α₁ ≃ β₁) (f : α₁ → α₁ → α₁)
theorem semiconj_conj (f : α₁ → α₁) : Semiconj e f (e.conj f) := fun x => by simp
#align equiv.semiconj_conj Equiv.semiconj_conj
theorem semiconj₂_conj : Semiconj₂ e f (e.arrowCongr e.conj f) := fun x y => by simp [arrowCongr]
#align equiv.semiconj₂_conj Equiv.semiconj₂_conj
instance [Std.Associative f] : Std.Associative (e.arrowCongr (e.arrowCongr e) f) :=
(e.semiconj₂_conj f).isAssociative_right e.surjective
instance [Std.IdempotentOp f] : Std.IdempotentOp (e.arrowCongr (e.arrowCongr e) f) :=
(e.semiconj₂_conj f).isIdempotent_right e.surjective
instance [IsLeftCancel α₁ f] : IsLeftCancel β₁ (e.arrowCongr (e.arrowCongr e) f) :=
⟨e.surjective.forall₃.2 fun x y z => by simpa using @IsLeftCancel.left_cancel _ f _ x y z⟩
instance [IsRightCancel α₁ f] : IsRightCancel β₁ (e.arrowCongr (e.arrowCongr e) f) :=
⟨e.surjective.forall₃.2 fun x y z => by simpa using @IsRightCancel.right_cancel _ f _ x y z⟩
end BinaryOp
section ULift
@[simp]
theorem ulift_symm_down (x : α) : (Equiv.ulift.{u, v}.symm x).down = x :=
rfl
end ULift
end Equiv
theorem Function.Injective.swap_apply
[DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x y z : α) :
Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) = f (Equiv.swap x y z) := by
by_cases hx:z = x
· simp [hx]
by_cases hy:z = y
· simp [hy]
rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx hy, Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (hf.ne hx) (hf.ne hy)]
#align function.injective.swap_apply Function.Injective.swap_apply
theorem Function.Injective.swap_comp
[DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x y : α) :
Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) ∘ f = f ∘ Equiv.swap x y :=
funext fun _ => hf.swap_apply _ _ _
#align function.injective.swap_comp Function.Injective.swap_comp
/-- If `α` is a subsingleton, then it is equivalent to `α × α`. -/
def subsingletonProdSelfEquiv [Subsingleton α] : α × α ≃ α where
toFun p := p.1
invFun a := (a, a)
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align subsingleton_prod_self_equiv subsingletonProdSelfEquiv
/-- To give an equivalence between two subsingleton types, it is sufficient to give any two
functions between them. -/
def equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton [Subsingleton α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
α ≃ β where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align equiv_of_subsingleton_of_subsingleton equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton
/-- A nonempty subsingleton type is (noncomputably) equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
noncomputable def Equiv.punitOfNonemptyOfSubsingleton [h : Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] :
α ≃ PUnit :=
equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun _ => PUnit.unit) fun _ => h.some
#align equiv.punit_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton Equiv.punitOfNonemptyOfSubsingleton
/-- `Unique (Unique α)` is equivalent to `Unique α`. -/
def uniqueUniqueEquiv : Unique (Unique α) ≃ Unique α :=
equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun h => h.default) fun h =>
{ default := h, uniq := fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _ }
#align unique_unique_equiv uniqueUniqueEquiv
/-- If `Unique β`, then `Unique α` is equivalent to `α ≃ β`. -/
def uniqueEquivEquivUnique (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) [Unique β] : Unique α ≃ (α ≃ β) :=
equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun _ => Equiv.equivOfUnique _ _) Equiv.unique
namespace Function
theorem update_comp_equiv [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β)
(g : α' ≃ α) (a : α) (v : β) :
update f a v ∘ g = update (f ∘ g) (g.symm a) v := by
rw [← update_comp_eq_of_injective _ g.injective, g.apply_symm_apply]
#align function.update_comp_equiv Function.update_comp_equiv
theorem update_apply_equiv_apply [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β)
(g : α' ≃ α) (a : α) (v : β) (a' : α') : update f a v (g a') = update (f ∘ g) (g.symm a) v a' :=
congr_fun (update_comp_equiv f g a v) a'
#align function.update_apply_equiv_apply Function.update_apply_equiv_apply
-- Porting note: EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq broken here too
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Basic.lean | 2,087 | 2,100 | theorem piCongrLeft'_update [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β)
(f : ∀ a, P a) (b : β) (x : P (e.symm b)) :
e.piCongrLeft' P (update f (e.symm b) x) = update (e.piCongrLeft' P f) b x := by |
ext b'
rcases eq_or_ne b' b with (rfl | h)
· simp
· simp only [Equiv.piCongrLeft'_apply, ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, update_noteq]
rw [update_noteq _]
rw [ne_eq]
intro h'
/- an example of something that should work, or also putting `EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq`
in the `simp` should too:
have := (EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq e).mp h' -/
cases e.symm.injective h' |> h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.WithDensity
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
#align_import measure_theory.function.strongly_measurable.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b52265189f3fb43aa631edffce5d060fafaf82f"
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure. We also provide almost everywhere versions of
these notions.
Almost everywhere strongly measurable functions form the largest class of functions that can be
integrated using the Bochner integral.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
* `AEStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `StronglyMeasurable` function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `FinStronglyMeasurable`
function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.sigmaFiniteSet`: a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
## Main statements
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, and for almost everywhere strongly
measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## References
* Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.FinStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure `μ` if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions. -/
def AEStronglyMeasurable
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, StronglyMeasurable g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEFinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions with support with finite measure. -/
def AEFinStronglyMeasurable
[Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, FinStronglyMeasurable g μ ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
@[aesop 30% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
⟨f, hf, EventuallyEq.refl _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· have h_univ : f ⁻¹' {x} = Set.univ := by
ext1 y
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [h_univ]
exact MeasurableSet.univ
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable
@[nontriviality]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias stronglyMeasurable_of_fintype := StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_finite (since := "2024-02-06")]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_finite f
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {b : β} :
StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [One β] :
StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) :=
stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_one MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_one
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_zero MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_zero
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const' MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const'
-- Porting note: changed binding type of `MeasurableSpace α`.
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_const' fun x y => by rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable'
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approx
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx_bounded MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_of_norm_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_ae MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_ae
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.norm_approx_bounded_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.norm_approxBounded_le
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· simp only [@Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' _ _ ⊥ _ _ f,
eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
#align strongly_measurable_bot_iff stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurable_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq]
refine fun n => (measure_biUnion_finset_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
refine ENNReal.sum_lt_top_iff.mpr fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable_of_set_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align continuous.comp_strongly_measurable Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_mul_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_mulSupport
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_support
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mono MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mono
protected theorem prod_mk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prod_mk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.prod_mk MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.prod_mk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.comp_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_left MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_right
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_right MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_right
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_add
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.inv MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.inv
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.neg MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.neg
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.div MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.div
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.sub MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk stronglyMeasurable_const)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd_const
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 510 | 516 | theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by |
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth, Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import group_theory.archimedean from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f93c11933efbc3c2f0299e47b8ff83e9b539cbf6"
/-!
# Archimedean groups
This file proves a few facts about ordered groups which satisfy the `Archimedean` property, that is:
`class Archimedean (α) [OrderedAddCommMonoid α] : Prop :=`
`(arch : ∀ (x : α) {y}, 0 < y → ∃ n : ℕ, x ≤ n • y)`
They are placed here in a separate file (rather than incorporated as a continuation of
`Algebra.Order.Archimedean`) because they rely on some imports from `GroupTheory` -- bundled
subgroups in particular.
The main result is `AddSubgroup.cyclic_of_min`: a subgroup of a decidable archimedean abelian
group is cyclic, if its set of positive elements has a minimal element.
This result is used in this file to deduce `Int.subgroup_cyclic`, proving that every subgroup of `ℤ`
is cyclic. (There are several other methods one could use to prove this fact, including more purely
algebraic methods, but none seem to exist in mathlib as of writing. The closest is
`Subgroup.is_cyclic`, but that has not been transferred to `AddSubgroup`.)
The result is also used in `Topology.Instances.Real` as an ingredient in the classification of
subgroups of `ℝ`.
-/
open Set
variable {G : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup G] [Archimedean G]
/-- Given a subgroup `H` of a decidable linearly ordered archimedean abelian group `G`, if there
exists a minimal element `a` of `H ∩ G_{>0}` then `H` is generated by `a`. -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Archimedean.lean | 40 | 54 | theorem AddSubgroup.cyclic_of_min {H : AddSubgroup G} {a : G}
(ha : IsLeast { g : G | g ∈ H ∧ 0 < g } a) : H = AddSubgroup.closure {a} := by |
obtain ⟨⟨a_in, a_pos⟩, a_min⟩ := ha
refine le_antisymm ?_ (H.closure_le.mpr <| by simp [a_in])
intro g g_in
obtain ⟨k, ⟨nonneg, lt⟩, _⟩ := existsUnique_zsmul_near_of_pos' a_pos g
have h_zero : g - k • a = 0 := by
by_contra h
have h : a ≤ g - k • a := by
refine a_min ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact AddSubgroup.sub_mem H g_in (AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem H a_in k)
· exact lt_of_le_of_ne nonneg (Ne.symm h)
have h' : ¬a ≤ g - k • a := not_le.mpr lt
contradiction
simp [sub_eq_zero.mp h_zero, AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
#align_import data.is_R_or_C.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"468b141b14016d54b479eb7a0fff1e360b7e3cf6"
/-! # Further lemmas about `RCLike` -/
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial
theorem ofReal_eval (p : ℝ[X]) (x : ℝ) : (↑(p.eval x) : K) = aeval (↑x) p :=
(@aeval_algebraMap_apply_eq_algebraMap_eval ℝ K _ _ _ x p).symm
#align polynomial.of_real_eval Polynomial.ofReal_eval
end Polynomial
namespace FiniteDimensional
open scoped Classical
open RCLike
library_note "RCLike instance"/--
This instance generates a type-class problem with a metavariable `?m` that should satisfy
`RCLike ?m`. Since this can only be satisfied by `ℝ` or `ℂ`, this does not cause problems. -/
/-- An `RCLike` field is finite-dimensional over `ℝ`, since it is spanned by `{1, I}`. -/
-- Porting note(#12094): removed nolint; dangerous_instance linter not ported yet
-- @[nolint dangerous_instance]
instance rclike_to_real : FiniteDimensional ℝ K :=
⟨{1, I}, by
suffices ∀ x : K, ∃ a b : ℝ, a • 1 + b • I = x by
simpa [Submodule.eq_top_iff', Submodule.mem_span_pair]
exact fun x ↦ ⟨re x, im x, by simp [real_smul_eq_coe_mul]⟩⟩
#align finite_dimensional.is_R_or_C_to_real FiniteDimensional.rclike_to_real
variable (K E)
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E]
/-- A finite dimensional vector space over an `RCLike` is a proper metric space.
This is not an instance because it would cause a search for `FiniteDimensional ?x E` before
`RCLike ?x`. -/
theorem proper_rclike [FiniteDimensional K E] : ProperSpace E := by
letI : NormedSpace ℝ E := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ K E
letI : FiniteDimensional ℝ E := FiniteDimensional.trans ℝ K E
infer_instance
#align finite_dimensional.proper_is_R_or_C FiniteDimensional.proper_rclike
variable {E}
instance RCLike.properSpace_submodule (S : Submodule K E) [FiniteDimensional K S] :
ProperSpace S :=
proper_rclike K S
#align finite_dimensional.is_R_or_C.proper_space_submodule FiniteDimensional.RCLike.properSpace_submodule
end FiniteDimensional
namespace RCLike
@[simp, rclike_simps]
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean | 71 | 74 | theorem reCLM_norm : ‖(reCLM : K →L[ℝ] ℝ)‖ = 1 := by |
apply le_antisymm (LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _)
convert ContinuousLinearMap.ratio_le_opNorm (reCLM : K →L[ℝ] ℝ) (1 : K)
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.PiTensorProduct.ProjectiveSeminorm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
/-!
# Injective seminorm on the tensor of a finite family of normed spaces.
Let `𝕜` be a nontrivially normed field and `E` be a family of normed `𝕜`-vector spaces `Eᵢ`,
indexed by a finite type `ι`. We define a seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, which we call the
"injective seminorm". It is chosen to satisfy the following property: for every
normed `𝕜`-vector space `F`, the linear equivalence
`MultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →ₗ[𝕜] F`
expressing the universal property of the tensor product induces an isometric linear equivalence
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`.
The idea is the following: Every normed `𝕜`-vector space `F` defines a linear map
from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →ₗ[𝕜] F`, which sends `x` to the map
`f ↦ f.lift x`. Thanks to `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm`, this map lands in
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F`. As this last space has a natural operator (semi)norm,
we get an induced seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, which, by
`PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm`, is bounded above by the projective seminorm
`PiTensorProduct.projectiveSeminorm`. We then take the `sup` of these seminorms as `F` varies;
as this family of seminorms is bounded, its `sup` has good properties.
In fact, we cannot take the `sup` over all normed spaces `F` because of set-theoretical issues,
so we only take spaces `F` in the same universe as `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`. We prove in
`norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm` that this gives the same result, because every multilinear map
from `E = Πᵢ Eᵢ` to `F` factors though a normed vector space in the same universe as
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
We then prove the universal property and the functoriality of `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` as a normed vector
space.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct.toDualContinuousMultilinearMap`: The `𝕜`-linear map from
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F` sending `x` to the map
`f ↦ f x`.
* `PiTensorProduct.injectiveSeminorm`: The injective seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.liftEquiv`: The bijection between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F`
and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`, as a continuous linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.liftIsometry`: The bijection between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F`
and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`, as an isometric linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.tprodL`: The canonical continuous multilinear map from `E = Πᵢ Eᵢ`
to `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapL`: The continuous linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `⨂[𝕜] i, E'ᵢ`
induced by a family of continuous linear maps `Eᵢ →L[𝕜] E'ᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapLMultilinear`: The continuous multilinear map from
`Πᵢ (Eᵢ →L[𝕜] E'ᵢ)` to `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, E'ᵢ)` sending a family
`f` to `PiTensorProduct.mapL f`.
## Main results
* `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm`: The main property of the injective seminorm
on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`: for every `x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` and every continuous multilinear map `f` from
`E = Πᵢ Eᵢ` to a normed space `F`, we have `‖f.lift x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * injectiveSeminorm x `.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapL_opNorm`: If `f` is a family of continuous linear maps
`fᵢ : Eᵢ →L[𝕜] Fᵢ`, then `‖PiTensorProduct.mapL f‖ ≤ ∏ i, ‖fᵢ‖`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapLMultilinear_opNorm` : If `F` is a normed vecteor space, then
`‖mapLMultilinear 𝕜 E F‖ ≤ 1`.
## TODO
* If all `Eᵢ` are separated and satisfy `SeparatingDual`, then the seminorm on
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` is a norm. This uses the construction of a basis of the `PiTensorProduct`, hence
depends on PR #11156. It should probably go in a separate file.
* Adapt the remaining functoriality constructions/properties from `PiTensorProduct`.
-/
universe uι u𝕜 uE uF
variable {ι : Type uι} [Fintype ι]
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : ι → Type uE} [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)]
variable {F : Type uF} [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
open scoped TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section seminorm
variable (F) in
/-- The linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F` sending
`x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to the map `f ↦ f.lift x`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def toDualContinuousMultilinearMap : (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →ₗ[𝕜]
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F where
toFun x := LinearMap.mkContinuous
((LinearMap.flip (lift (R := 𝕜) (s := E) (E := F)).toLinearMap x) ∘ₗ
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear)
(projectiveSeminorm x)
(fun _ ↦ by simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.flip_apply,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
exact norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm _ _ _)
map_add' x y := by
ext _
simp only [map_add, LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.flip_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' a x := by
ext _
simp only [map_smul, LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply,
LinearMap.flip_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, RingHom.id_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul',
Pi.smul_apply]
theorem toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
‖toDualContinuousMultilinearMap F x‖ ≤ projectiveSeminorm x := by
simp only [toDualContinuousMultilinearMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk]
apply LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (apply_nonneg _ _)
/-- The injective seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`. Morally, it sends `x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to the
`sup` of the operator norms of the `PiTensorProduct.toDualContinuousMultilinearMap F x`, for all
normed vector spaces `F`. In fact, we only take in the same universe as `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, and then
prove in `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm` that this gives the same result.
-/
noncomputable irreducible_def injectiveSeminorm : Seminorm 𝕜 (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :=
sSup {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)) (_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G)
(_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G), p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))}
lemma dualSeminorms_bounded : BddAbove {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE))
(_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G) (_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G),
p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))} := by
existsi projectiveSeminorm
rw [mem_upperBounds]
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, forall_exists_index]
intro p G _ _ hp
rw [hp]
intro x
simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
exact toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm _
theorem injectiveSeminorm_apply (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
injectiveSeminorm x = ⨆ p : {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE))
(_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G) (_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G), p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜
(ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))}, p.1 x := by
simp [injectiveSeminorm]
exact Seminorm.sSup_apply dualSeminorms_bounded
theorem norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
‖lift f.toMultilinearMap x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * injectiveSeminorm x := by
/- If `F` were in `Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)` (which is the type of `⨂[𝕜] i, E i`), then the
property that we want to prove would hold by definition of `injectiveSeminorm`. This is
not necessarily true, but we will show that there exists a normed vector space `G` in
`Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)` and an injective isometry from `G` to `F` such that `f` factors
through a continuous multilinear map `f'` from `E = Π i, E i` to `G`, to which we can apply
the definition of `injectiveSeminorm`. The desired inequality for `f` then follows
immediately.
The idea is very simple: the multilinear map `f` corresponds by `PiTensorProduct.lift`
to a linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, E i` to `F`, say `l`. We want to take `G` to be the image of
`l`, with the norm induced from that of `F`; to make sure that we are in the correct universe,
it is actually more convenient to take `G` equal to the coimage of `l` (i.e. the quotient
of `⨂[𝕜] i, E i` by the kernel of `l`), which is canonically isomorphic to its image by
`LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange`. -/
set G := (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) ⧸ LinearMap.ker (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
set G' := LinearMap.range (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
set e := LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
letI := SeminormedAddCommGroup.induced G G' e
letI := NormedSpace.induced 𝕜 G G' e
set f'₀ := lift.symm (e.symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ LinearMap.rangeRestrict (lift f.toMultilinearMap))
have hf'₀ : ∀ (x : Π (i : ι), E i), ‖f'₀ x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖x i‖ := fun x ↦ by
change ‖e (f'₀ x)‖ ≤ _
simp only [lift_symm, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Submodule.coe_norm,
LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe, e, f'₀]
exact f.le_opNorm x
set f' := MultilinearMap.mkContinuous f'₀ ‖f‖ hf'₀
have hnorm : ‖f'‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := (f'.opNorm_le_iff (norm_nonneg f)).mpr hf'₀
have heq : e (lift f'.toMultilinearMap x) = lift f.toMultilinearMap x := by
induction' x using PiTensorProduct.induction_on with a m _ _ hx hy
· simp only [lift_symm, map_smul, lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe,
MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, SetLike.val_smul,
LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, f', f'₀]
· simp only [map_add, AddSubmonoid.coe_add, Submodule.coe_toAddSubmonoid, hx, hy]
suffices h : ‖lift f'.toMultilinearMap x‖ ≤ ‖f'‖ * injectiveSeminorm x by
change ‖(e (lift f'.toMultilinearMap x)).1‖ ≤ _ at h
rw [heq] at h
exact le_trans h (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hnorm (apply_nonneg _ _))
have hle : Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E)) ≤ injectiveSeminorm := by
simp only [injectiveSeminorm]
refine le_csSup dualSeminorms_bounded ?_
rw [Set.mem_setOf]
existsi G, inferInstance, inferInstance
rfl
refine le_trans ?_ (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hle x) (norm_nonneg f'))
simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm, ← toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_apply_apply]
rw [mul_comm]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/PiTensorProduct/InjectiveSeminorm.lean | 204 | 219 | theorem injectiveSeminorm_le_projectiveSeminorm :
injectiveSeminorm (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) ≤ projectiveSeminorm := by |
rw [injectiveSeminorm]
refine csSup_le ?_ ?_
· existsi 0
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
existsi PUnit, inferInstance, inferInstance
ext x
simp only [Seminorm.zero_apply, Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
have heq : toDualContinuousMultilinearMap PUnit x = 0 := by ext _
rw [heq, norm_zero]
· intro p hp
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hp
obtain ⟨G, _, _, h⟩ := hp
rw [h]; intro x; simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
exact toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Algebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.IsPoly
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.frobenius from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0723536a0522d24fc2f159a096fb3304bef77472"
/-!
## The Frobenius operator
If `R` has characteristic `p`, then there is a ring endomorphism `frobenius R p`
that raises `r : R` to the power `p`.
By applying `WittVector.map` to `frobenius R p`, we obtain a ring endomorphism `𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 R`.
It turns out that this endomorphism can be described by polynomials over `ℤ`
that do not depend on `R` or the fact that it has characteristic `p`.
In this way, we obtain a Frobenius endomorphism `WittVector.frobeniusFun : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R`
for every commutative ring `R`.
Unfortunately, the aforementioned polynomials can not be obtained using the machinery
of `wittStructureInt` that was developed in `StructurePolynomial.lean`.
We therefore have to define the polynomials by hand, and check that they have the required property.
In case `R` has characteristic `p`, we show in `frobenius_eq_map_frobenius`
that `WittVector.frobeniusFun` is equal to `WittVector.map (frobenius R p)`.
### Main definitions and results
* `frobeniusPoly`: the polynomials that describe the coefficients of `frobeniusFun`;
* `frobeniusFun`: the Frobenius endomorphism on Witt vectors;
* `frobeniusFun_isPoly`: the tautological assertion that Frobenius is a polynomial function;
* `frobenius_eq_map_frobenius`: the fact that in characteristic `p`, Frobenius is equal to
`WittVector.map (frobenius R p)`.
TODO: Show that `WittVector.frobeniusFun` is a ring homomorphism,
and bundle it into `WittVector.frobenius`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace WittVector
variable {p : ℕ} {R S : Type*} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
noncomputable section
open MvPolynomial Finset
variable (p)
/-- The rational polynomials that give the coefficients of `frobenius x`,
in terms of the coefficients of `x`.
These polynomials actually have integral coefficients,
see `frobeniusPoly` and `map_frobeniusPoly`. -/
def frobeniusPolyRat (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℚ :=
bind₁ (wittPolynomial p ℚ ∘ fun n => n + 1) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)
#align witt_vector.frobenius_poly_rat WittVector.frobeniusPolyRat
theorem bind₁_frobeniusPolyRat_wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobeniusPolyRat p) (wittPolynomial p ℚ n) = wittPolynomial p ℚ (n + 1) := by
delta frobeniusPolyRat
rw [← bind₁_bind₁, bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial, bind₁_X_right, Function.comp_apply]
#align witt_vector.bind₁_frobenius_poly_rat_witt_polynomial WittVector.bind₁_frobeniusPolyRat_wittPolynomial
/-- An auxiliary definition, to avoid an excessive amount of finiteness proofs
for `multiplicity p n`. -/
private def pnat_multiplicity (n : ℕ+) : ℕ :=
(multiplicity p n).get <| multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.mpr <| ⟨ne_of_gt hp.1.one_lt, n.2⟩
local notation "v" => pnat_multiplicity
/-- An auxiliary polynomial over the integers, that satisfies
`p * (frobeniusPolyAux p n) + X n ^ p = frobeniusPoly p n`.
This makes it easy to show that `frobeniusPoly p n` is congruent to `X n ^ p`
modulo `p`. -/
noncomputable def frobeniusPolyAux : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ
| n => X (n + 1) - ∑ i : Fin n, have _ := i.is_lt
∑ j ∈ range (p ^ (n - i)),
(((X (i : ℕ) ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - (i : ℕ)) - (j + 1)) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ) *
(frobeniusPolyAux i) ^ (j + 1)) *
C (((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / (p ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩))
* ↑p ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩) : ℕ) : ℤ)
#align witt_vector.frobenius_poly_aux WittVector.frobeniusPolyAux
theorem frobeniusPolyAux_eq (n : ℕ) :
frobeniusPolyAux p n =
X (n + 1) - ∑ i ∈ range n,
∑ j ∈ range (p ^ (n - i)),
(X i ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - i) - (j + 1)) * frobeniusPolyAux p i ^ (j + 1) *
C ↑((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / p ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩) *
↑p ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, Nat.succ_pos j⟩) : ℕ) := by
rw [frobeniusPolyAux, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
#align witt_vector.frobenius_poly_aux_eq WittVector.frobeniusPolyAux_eq
/-- The polynomials that give the coefficients of `frobenius x`,
in terms of the coefficients of `x`. -/
def frobeniusPoly (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ :=
X n ^ p + C (p : ℤ) * frobeniusPolyAux p n
#align witt_vector.frobenius_poly WittVector.frobeniusPoly
/-
Our next goal is to prove
```
lemma map_frobeniusPoly (n : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (frobeniusPoly p n) = frobeniusPolyRat p n
```
This lemma has a rather long proof, but it mostly boils down to applying induction,
and then using the following two key facts at the right point.
-/
/-- A key divisibility fact for the proof of `WittVector.map_frobeniusPoly`. -/
theorem map_frobeniusPoly.key₁ (n j : ℕ) (hj : j < p ^ n) :
p ^ (n - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) ∣ (p ^ n).choose (j + 1) := by
apply multiplicity.pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity
rw [hp.out.multiplicity_choose_prime_pow hj j.succ_ne_zero]
rfl
#align witt_vector.map_frobenius_poly.key₁ WittVector.map_frobeniusPoly.key₁
/-- A key numerical identity needed for the proof of `WittVector.map_frobeniusPoly`. -/
theorem map_frobeniusPoly.key₂ {n i j : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) (hj : j < p ^ (n - i)) :
j - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩ + n = i + j + (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) := by
generalize h : v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩ = m
rsuffices ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ : m ≤ n - i ∧ m ≤ j
· rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h₂, add_comm i j, add_tsub_assoc_of_le (h₁.trans (Nat.sub_le n i)),
add_assoc, tsub_right_comm, add_comm i,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_tsub_of_add_le_right ((le_tsub_iff_left hi).mp h₁))]
have hle : p ^ m ≤ j + 1 := h ▸ Nat.le_of_dvd j.succ_pos (multiplicity.pow_multiplicity_dvd _)
exact ⟨(pow_le_pow_iff_right hp.1.one_lt).1 (hle.trans hj),
Nat.le_of_lt_succ ((Nat.lt_pow_self hp.1.one_lt m).trans_le hle)⟩
#align witt_vector.map_frobenius_poly.key₂ WittVector.map_frobeniusPoly.key₂
theorem map_frobeniusPoly (n : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (frobeniusPoly p n) = frobeniusPolyRat p n := by
rw [frobeniusPoly, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_pow, map_C, map_X, eq_intCast,
Int.cast_natCast, frobeniusPolyRat]
refine Nat.strong_induction_on n ?_; clear n
intro n IH
rw [xInTermsOfW_eq]
simp only [AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_sub, AlgHom.map_mul, AlgHom.map_pow, bind₁_C_right]
have h1 : (p : ℚ) ^ n * ⅟ (p : ℚ) ^ n = 1 := by rw [← mul_pow, mul_invOf_self, one_pow]
rw [bind₁_X_right, Function.comp_apply, wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ,
sum_range_succ, tsub_self, add_tsub_cancel_left, pow_zero, pow_one, pow_one, sub_mul, add_mul,
add_mul, mul_right_comm, mul_right_comm (C ((p : ℚ) ^ (n + 1))), ← C_mul, ← C_mul, pow_succ',
mul_assoc (p : ℚ) ((p : ℚ) ^ n), h1, mul_one, C_1, one_mul, add_comm _ (X n ^ p), add_assoc,
← add_sub, add_right_inj, frobeniusPolyAux_eq, RingHom.map_sub, map_X, mul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
add_comm _ (C (p : ℚ) * X (n + 1)), ← add_sub,
add_right_inj, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, neg_sub, eq_comm]
simp only [map_sum, mul_sum, sum_mul, ← sum_sub_distrib]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro i hi
rw [mem_range] at hi
rw [← IH i hi]
clear IH
rw [add_comm (X i ^ p), add_pow, sum_range_succ', pow_zero, tsub_zero, Nat.choose_zero_right,
one_mul, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_add, add_mul, Nat.succ_sub (le_of_lt hi),
Nat.succ_eq_add_one (n - i), pow_succ', pow_mul, add_sub_cancel_right, mul_sum, sum_mul]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro j hj
rw [mem_range] at hj
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_pow,
RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_pow, map_C, map_X, mul_pow]
rw [mul_comm (C (p : ℚ) ^ i), mul_comm _ ((X i ^ p) ^ _), mul_comm (C (p : ℚ) ^ (j + 1)),
mul_comm (C (p : ℚ))]
simp only [mul_assoc]
apply congr_arg
apply congr_arg
rw [← C_eq_coe_nat]
simp only [← RingHom.map_pow, ← C_mul]
rw [C_inj]
simp only [invOf_eq_inv, eq_intCast, inv_pow, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_mul, Int.cast_mul]
rw [Rat.natCast_div _ _ (map_frobeniusPoly.key₁ p (n - i) j hj)]
simp only [Nat.cast_pow, pow_add, pow_one]
suffices
(((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1): ℚ) * (p : ℚ) ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) * ↑p * (p ^ n : ℚ))
= (p : ℚ) ^ j * p * ↑((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) * p ^ i) *
(p : ℚ) ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) by
have aux : ∀ k : ℕ, (p : ℚ)^ k ≠ 0 := by
intro; apply pow_ne_zero; exact mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero
simpa [aux, -one_div, -pow_eq_zero_iff', field_simps] using this.symm
rw [mul_comm _ (p : ℚ), mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← pow_add,
map_frobeniusPoly.key₂ p hi.le hj, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_pow]
ring
#align witt_vector.map_frobenius_poly WittVector.map_frobeniusPoly
theorem frobeniusPoly_zmod (n : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (frobeniusPoly p n) = X n ^ p := by
rw [frobeniusPoly, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_mul, map_X, map_C]
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, add_zero, eq_intCast, ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, C_0]
#align witt_vector.frobenius_poly_zmod WittVector.frobeniusPoly_zmod
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_frobeniusPoly_wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobeniusPoly p) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [map_bind₁, map_frobeniusPoly, bind₁_frobeniusPolyRat_wittPolynomial,
map_wittPolynomial]
#align witt_vector.bind₁_frobenius_poly_witt_polynomial WittVector.bind₁_frobeniusPoly_wittPolynomial
variable {p}
/-- `frobeniusFun` is the function underlying the ring endomorphism
`frobenius : 𝕎 R →+* frobenius 𝕎 R`. -/
def frobeniusFun (x : 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => MvPolynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobeniusPoly p n)
#align witt_vector.frobenius_fun WittVector.frobeniusFun
theorem coeff_frobeniusFun (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (frobeniusFun x) n = MvPolynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobeniusPoly p n) := by
rw [frobeniusFun, coeff_mk]
#align witt_vector.coeff_frobenius_fun WittVector.coeff_frobeniusFun
variable (p)
/-- `frobeniusFun` is tautologically a polynomial function.
See also `frobenius_isPoly`. -/
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`.
instance frobeniusFun_isPoly : IsPoly p fun R _Rcr => @frobeniusFun p R _ _Rcr :=
⟨⟨frobeniusPoly p, by intros; funext n; apply coeff_frobeniusFun⟩⟩
#align witt_vector.frobenius_fun_is_poly WittVector.frobeniusFun_isPoly
variable {p}
@[ghost_simps]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Frobenius.lean | 236 | 239 | theorem ghostComponent_frobeniusFun (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) :
ghostComponent n (frobeniusFun x) = ghostComponent (n + 1) x := by |
simp only [ghostComponent_apply, frobeniusFun, coeff_mk, ← bind₁_frobeniusPoly_wittPolynomial,
aeval_bind₁]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_def Pi.himp_def
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_def Pi.hnot_def
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_apply Pi.himp_apply
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_apply Pi.hnot_apply
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_left_comm himp_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_idem himp_idem
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
#align himp_inf_distrib himp_inf_distrib
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
#align sup_himp_distrib sup_himp_distrib
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
#align himp_le_himp_left himp_le_himp_left
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
#align himp_le_himp_right himp_le_himp_right
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
#align himp_le_himp himp_le_himp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_left sup_himp_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_right sup_himp_self_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_right Codisjoint.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_left Codisjoint.himp_eq_left
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
#align le_himp_himp le_himp_himp
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
#align himp_triangle himp_triangle
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
#align himp_inf_himp_cancel himp_inf_himp_cancel
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
#align prod.generalized_heyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_heyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
#align sdiff_sdiff sdiff_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_left sdiff_sdiff_left
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_comm sdiff_sdiff_comm
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_idem sdiff_idem
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
#align sdiff_sdiff_self sdiff_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align sup_sdiff_distrib sup_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
#align sdiff_inf_distrib sdiff_inf_distrib
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
#align sup_sdiff sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sup_sdiff_right_self sup_sdiff_right_self
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
#align sup_sdiff_left_self sup_sdiff_left_self
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_right sdiff_le_sdiff_right
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_left sdiff_le_sdiff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
#align sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_le_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
#align sdiff_inf sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_left sdiff_inf_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_right sdiff_inf_self_right
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_left Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_right Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
#align disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
#align sdiff_sdiff_le sdiff_sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_triangle sdiff_triangle
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
#align sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
#align inf_sdiff_sup_left inf_sdiff_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
#align inf_sdiff_sup_right inf_sdiff_sup_right
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
#align prod.generalized_coheyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_coheyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
#align himp_bot himp_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_himp bot_himp
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
#align compl_sup_distrib compl_sup_distrib
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
#align compl_sup compl_sup
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
#align compl_le_himp compl_le_himp
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
#align compl_sup_le_himp compl_sup_le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
#align sup_compl_le_himp sup_compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_compl himp_compl
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
#align himp_compl_comm himp_compl_comm
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
#align le_compl_iff_disjoint_right le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
#align le_compl_iff_disjoint_left le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
#align le_compl_comm le_compl_comm
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
#align disjoint.le_compl_right Disjoint.le_compl_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
#align disjoint.le_compl_left Disjoint.le_compl_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
#align le_compl_iff_le_compl le_compl_iff_le_compl
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
#align le_compl_of_le_compl le_compl_of_le_compl
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
#align disjoint_compl_left disjoint_compl_left
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
#align disjoint_compl_right disjoint_compl_right
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
#align has_le.le.disjoint_compl_left LE.le.disjoint_compl_left
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
#align has_le.le.disjoint_compl_right LE.le.disjoint_compl_right
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
#align is_compl.compl_eq IsCompl.compl_eq
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
#align is_compl.eq_compl IsCompl.eq_compl
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
#align compl_unique compl_unique
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
#align inf_compl_self inf_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
#align compl_inf_self compl_inf_self
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
#align inf_compl_eq_bot inf_compl_eq_bot
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
#align compl_inf_eq_bot compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
#align compl_top compl_top
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
#align compl_bot compl_bot
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
#align le_compl_compl le_compl_compl
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
#align compl_anti compl_anti
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
#align compl_le_compl compl_le_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
#align compl_compl_compl compl_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
#align disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
#align disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
#align compl_sup_compl_le compl_sup_compl_le
theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
#align compl_compl_inf_distrib compl_compl_inf_distrib
theorem compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_himp_iff, ← compl_compl_inf_distrib]
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le)
· refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans ?_)
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm, ←
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
exact inf_himp_le
#align compl_compl_himp_distrib compl_compl_himp_distrib
instance OrderDual.instCoheytingAlgebra : CoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
hnot := toDual ∘ compl ∘ ofDual
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
top_sdiff := @himp_bot α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (￢a) = (ofDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
#align of_dual_hnot ofDual_hnot
@[simp]
theorem toDual_compl (a : α) : toDual aᶜ = ￢toDual a :=
rfl
#align to_dual_compl toDual_compl
instance Prod.instHeytingAlgebra [HeytingAlgebra β] : HeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
himp_bot a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨himp_bot a.1, himp_bot a.2⟩
#align prod.heyting_algebra Prod.instHeytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, HeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
HeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
himp_bot f := funext fun i ↦ himp_bot (f i)
#align pi.heyting_algebra Pi.instHeytingAlgebra
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a :=
CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff _
#align top_sdiff' top_sdiff'
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
#align sdiff_top sdiff_top
theorem hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ￢(a ⊓ b) = ￢a ⊔ ￢b := by
simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
#align hnot_inf_distrib hnot_inf_distrib
theorem sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ￢b :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq <| top_sdiff' _
#align sdiff_le_hnot sdiff_le_hnot
theorem sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
#align sdiff_le_inf_hnot sdiff_le_inf_hnot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 960 | 960 | theorem hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ￢a \ a = ￢a := by | rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.fin.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals in `Fin n`
This file proves that `Fin n` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as Finsets and Fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace Fin
variable {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup : ↑(a ⊔ b) = (a ⊔ b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_sup Fin.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf : ↑(a ⊓ b) = (a ⊓ b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_inf Fin.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max : ↑(max a b) = (max a b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_max Fin.coe_max
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min : ↑(min a b) = (min a b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_min Fin.coe_min
end Fin
open Finset Fin Function
namespace Fin
variable (n : ℕ)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (Fin n) :=
OrderIso.locallyFiniteOrder Fin.orderIsoSubtype
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Fin n) :=
OrderIso.locallyFiniteOrderBot Fin.orderIsoSubtype
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
variable {n} (a b : Fin n)
theorem Icc_eq_finset_subtype : Icc a b = (Icc (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Icc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Icc_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ico_eq_finset_subtype : Ico a b = (Ico (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ico_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ico_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_subtype : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ioc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ioc_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_subtype : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ioo_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ioo_eq_finset_subtype
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_subtype : uIcc a b = (uIcc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := rfl
#align fin.uIcc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.uIcc_eq_finset_subtype
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Icc : (Icc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Icc ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Icc_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map, Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Icc Fin.map_valEmbedding_Icc
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ico : (Ico a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Ico_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Ico Fin.map_valEmbedding_Ico
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Fin.lean | 89 | 90 | theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioc : (Ioc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioc ↑a ↑b := by |
simp [Ioc_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map, Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Benjamin Davidson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.ArctanDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
#align_import analysis.special_functions.integrals from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"011cafb4a5bc695875d186e245d6b3df03bf6c40"
/-!
# Integration of specific interval integrals
This file contains proofs of the integrals of various specific functions. This includes:
* Integrals of simple functions, such as `id`, `pow`, `inv`, `exp`, `log`
* Integrals of some trigonometric functions, such as `sin`, `cos`, `1 / (1 + x^2)`
* The integral of `cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2`
* Reduction formulae for the integrals of `sin x ^ n` and `cos x ^ n` for `n ≥ 2`
* The computation of `∫ x in 0..π, sin x ^ n` as a product for even and odd `n` (used in proving the
Wallis product for pi)
* Integrals of the form `sin x ^ m * cos x ^ n`
With these lemmas, many simple integrals can be computed by `simp` or `norm_num`.
See `test/integration.lean` for specific examples.
This file also contains some facts about the interval integrability of specific functions.
This file is still being developed.
## Tags
integrate, integration, integrable, integrability
-/
open Real Nat Set Finset
open scoped Real Interval
variable {a b : ℝ} (n : ℕ)
namespace intervalIntegral
open MeasureTheory
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {μ ν : Measure ℝ} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c d : ℝ)
/-! ### Interval integrability -/
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_pow : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ n) μ a b :=
(continuous_pow n).intervalIntegrable a b
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_pow intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_pow
theorem intervalIntegrable_zpow {n : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ n ∨ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ n) μ a b :=
(continuousOn_id.zpow₀ n fun _ hx => h.symm.imp (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx) id).intervalIntegrable
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_zpow intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_zpow
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_rpow'` for a version with a weaker hypothesis on `r`, but assuming the
measure is volume. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_rpow {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r ∨ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) μ a b :=
(continuousOn_id.rpow_const fun _ hx =>
h.symm.imp (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx) id).intervalIntegrable
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_rpow intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_rpow` for a version applying to any locally finite measure, but with a
stronger hypothesis on `r`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_rpow' {r : ℝ} (h : -1 < r) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) volume a b := by
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) volume 0 c by
exact IntervalIntegrable.trans (this a).symm (this b)
have : ∀ c : ℝ, 0 ≤ c → IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) volume 0 c := by
intro c hc
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le hc]
have hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioo 0 c, HasDerivAt (fun x : ℝ => x ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1)) (x ^ r) x := by
intro x hx
convert (Real.hasDerivAt_rpow_const (p := r + 1) (Or.inl hx.1.ne')).div_const (r + 1) using 1
field_simp [(by linarith : r + 1 ≠ 0)]
apply integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg _ hderiv
· intro x hx; apply rpow_nonneg hx.1.le
· refine (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_).div_const _; intro x _; right; linarith
intro c; rcases le_total 0 c with (hc | hc)
· exact this c hc
· rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg, neg_zero]
have m := (this (-c) (by linarith)).smul (cos (r * π))
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at m ⊢
refine m.congr_fun ?_ measurableSet_Ioc; intro x hx
rw [uIoc_of_le (by linarith : 0 ≤ -c)] at hx
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, log_neg_eq_log, mul_comm,
rpow_def_of_pos hx.1, rpow_def_of_neg (by linarith [hx.1] : -x < 0)]
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_rpow' intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow'
/-- The power function `x ↦ x^s` is integrable on `(0, t)` iff `-1 < s`. -/
lemma integrableOn_Ioo_rpow_iff {s t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ x ^ s) (Ioo (0 : ℝ) t) ↔ -1 < s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simpa [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le ht.le]
using intervalIntegrable_rpow' h (a := 0) (b := t)⟩
contrapose! h
intro H
have I : 0 < min 1 t := lt_min zero_lt_one ht
have H' : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ x ^ s) (Ioo 0 (min 1 t)) :=
H.mono (Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl (min_le_right _ _)) le_rfl
have : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ x⁻¹) (Ioo 0 (min 1 t)) := by
apply H'.mono' measurable_inv.aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioo] with x hx
simp only [norm_inv, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx.1)]
rwa [← Real.rpow_neg_one x, Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one hx.1]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hx.2 (min_le_left _ _)
have : IntervalIntegrable (fun x ↦ x⁻¹) volume 0 (min 1 t) := by
rwa [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le I.le]
simp [intervalIntegrable_inv_iff, I.ne] at this
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_cpow'` for a version with a weaker hypothesis on `r`, but assuming the
measure is volume. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_cpow {r : ℂ} (h : 0 ≤ r.re ∨ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ r) μ a b := by
by_cases h2 : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]
· -- Easy case #1: 0 ∉ [a, b] -- use continuity.
refine (ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun x hx => ?_).intervalIntegrable
exact Complex.continuousAt_ofReal_cpow_const _ _ (Or.inr <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h2)
rw [eq_false h2, or_false_iff] at h
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h' | h')
· -- Easy case #2: 0 < re r -- again use continuity
exact (Complex.continuous_ofReal_cpow_const h').intervalIntegrable _ _
-- Now the hard case: re r = 0 and 0 is in the interval.
refine (IntervalIntegrable.intervalIntegrable_norm_iff ?_).mp ?_
· refine (measurable_of_continuousOn_compl_singleton (0 : ℝ) ?_).aestronglyMeasurable
exact ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun x hx =>
Complex.continuousAt_ofReal_cpow_const x r (Or.inr hx)
-- reduce to case of integral over `[0, c]`
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => ‖(x:ℂ) ^ r‖) μ 0 c from
(this a).symm.trans (this b)
intro c
rcases le_or_lt 0 c with (hc | hc)
· -- case `0 ≤ c`: integrand is identically 1
have : IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => 1 : ℝ → ℝ) μ 0 c := intervalIntegrable_const
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hc] at this ⊢
refine IntegrableOn.congr_fun this (fun x hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioc
dsimp only
rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1, ← h', rpow_zero]
· -- case `c < 0`: integrand is identically constant, *except* at `x = 0` if `r ≠ 0`.
apply IntervalIntegrable.symm
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hc.le]
have : Ioc c 0 = Ioo c 0 ∪ {(0 : ℝ)} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_Icc_eq_Ioc hc (le_refl 0), ← Icc_def]
simp_rw [← le_antisymm_iff, setOf_eq_eq_singleton']
rw [this, integrableOn_union, and_comm]; constructor
· refine integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr (Or.inr ?_)
exact isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts_of_isLocallyFiniteMeasure.lt_top_of_isCompact
isCompact_singleton
· have : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo c 0 → ‖Complex.exp (↑π * Complex.I * r)‖ = ‖(x : ℂ) ^ r‖ := by
intro x hx
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos hx.2.le, norm_mul, ← Complex.ofReal_neg,
Complex.norm_eq_abs (_ ^ _), Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (neg_pos.mpr hx.2), ← h',
rpow_zero, one_mul]
refine IntegrableOn.congr_fun ?_ this measurableSet_Ioo
rw [integrableOn_const]
refine Or.inr ((measure_mono Set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self).trans_lt ?_)
exact isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts_of_isLocallyFiniteMeasure.lt_top_of_isCompact isCompact_Icc
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_cpow intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_cpow` for a version applying to any locally finite measure, but with a
stronger hypothesis on `r`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_cpow' {r : ℂ} (h : -1 < r.re) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ r) volume a b := by
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (x : ℂ) ^ r) volume 0 c by
exact IntervalIntegrable.trans (this a).symm (this b)
have : ∀ c : ℝ, 0 ≤ c → IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (x : ℂ) ^ r) volume 0 c := by
intro c hc
rw [← IntervalIntegrable.intervalIntegrable_norm_iff]
· rw [intervalIntegrable_iff]
apply IntegrableOn.congr_fun
· rw [← intervalIntegrable_iff]; exact intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow' h
· intro x hx
rw [uIoc_of_le hc] at hx
dsimp only
rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
· exact measurableSet_uIoc
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_uIoc
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun x hx => ?_
rw [uIoc_of_le hc] at hx
refine (continuousAt_cpow_const (Or.inl ?_)).comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
rw [Complex.ofReal_re]
exact hx.1
intro c; rcases le_total 0 c with (hc | hc)
· exact this c hc
· rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg, neg_zero]
have m := (this (-c) (by linarith)).const_mul (Complex.exp (π * Complex.I * r))
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le (by linarith : 0 ≤ -c)] at m ⊢
refine m.congr_fun (fun x hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioc
dsimp only
have : -x ≤ 0 := by linarith [hx.1]
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos this, mul_comm]
simp
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_cpow' intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow'
/-- The complex power function `x ↦ x^s` is integrable on `(0, t)` iff `-1 < s.re`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioo_cpow_iff {s : ℂ} {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x : ℂ) ^ s) (Ioo (0 : ℝ) t) ↔ -1 < s.re := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simpa [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le ht.le]
using intervalIntegrable_cpow' h (a := 0) (b := t)⟩
have B : IntegrableOn (fun a ↦ a ^ s.re) (Ioo 0 t) := by
apply (integrableOn_congr_fun _ measurableSet_Ioo).1 h.norm
intro a ha
simp [Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos ha.1]
rwa [integrableOn_Ioo_rpow_iff ht] at B
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_id : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x) μ a b :=
continuous_id.intervalIntegrable a b
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_id intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_id
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem intervalIntegrable_const : IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b :=
continuous_const.intervalIntegrable a b
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_const intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_const
theorem intervalIntegrable_one_div (h : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ [[a, b]] → f x ≠ 0)
(hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => 1 / f x) μ a b :=
(continuousOn_const.div hf h).intervalIntegrable
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_one_div intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_one_div
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_inv (h : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ [[a, b]] → f x ≠ 0)
(hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) μ a b := by
simpa only [one_div] using intervalIntegrable_one_div h hf
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_inv intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_inv
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_exp : IntervalIntegrable exp μ a b :=
continuous_exp.intervalIntegrable a b
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_exp intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_exp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.IntervalIntegrable.log (hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]])
(h : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ [[a, b]] → f x ≠ 0) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => log (f x)) μ a b :=
(ContinuousOn.log hf h).intervalIntegrable
#align interval_integrable.log IntervalIntegrable.log
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_log (h : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable log μ a b :=
IntervalIntegrable.log continuousOn_id fun _ hx => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_log intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_log
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_sin : IntervalIntegrable sin μ a b :=
continuous_sin.intervalIntegrable a b
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_sin intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_sin
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_cos : IntervalIntegrable cos μ a b :=
continuous_cos.intervalIntegrable a b
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_cos intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cos
theorem intervalIntegrable_one_div_one_add_sq :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => 1 / (↑1 + x ^ 2)) μ a b := by
refine (continuous_const.div ?_ fun x => ?_).intervalIntegrable a b
· continuity
· nlinarith
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_one_div_one_add_sq intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_one_div_one_add_sq
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_inv_one_add_sq :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (↑1 + x ^ 2)⁻¹) μ a b := by
field_simp; exact mod_cast intervalIntegrable_one_div_one_add_sq
#align interval_integral.interval_integrable_inv_one_add_sq intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_inv_one_add_sq
/-! ### Integrals of the form `c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x + d)` -/
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp];
-- simpNF says LHS does not simplify when applying lemma on itself
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_right : (c * ∫ x in a..b, f (x * c)) = ∫ x in a * c..b * c, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_right f c
#align interval_integral.mul_integral_comp_mul_right intervalIntegral.mul_integral_comp_mul_right
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_left : (c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x)) = ∫ x in c * a..c * b, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_left f c
#align interval_integral.mul_integral_comp_mul_left intervalIntegral.mul_integral_comp_mul_left
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_div : (c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c)) = ∫ x in a / c..b / c, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_div f c
#align interval_integral.inv_mul_integral_comp_div intervalIntegral.inv_mul_integral_comp_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_add :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x + d)) = ∫ x in c * a + d..c * b + d, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_add f c d
#align interval_integral.mul_integral_comp_mul_add intervalIntegral.mul_integral_comp_mul_add
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_add_mul :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (d + c * x)) = ∫ x in d + c * a..d + c * b, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_add_mul f c d
#align interval_integral.mul_integral_comp_add_mul intervalIntegral.mul_integral_comp_add_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_div_add :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c + d)) = ∫ x in a / c + d..b / c + d, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_div_add f c d
#align interval_integral.inv_mul_integral_comp_div_add intervalIntegral.inv_mul_integral_comp_div_add
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_add_div :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (d + x / c)) = ∫ x in d + a / c..d + b / c, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_add_div f c d
#align interval_integral.inv_mul_integral_comp_add_div intervalIntegral.inv_mul_integral_comp_add_div
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_sub :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x - d)) = ∫ x in c * a - d..c * b - d, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_sub f c d
#align interval_integral.mul_integral_comp_mul_sub intervalIntegral.mul_integral_comp_mul_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_sub_mul :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (d - c * x)) = ∫ x in d - c * b..d - c * a, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_sub_mul f c d
#align interval_integral.mul_integral_comp_sub_mul intervalIntegral.mul_integral_comp_sub_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_div_sub :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c - d)) = ∫ x in a / c - d..b / c - d, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_div_sub f c d
#align interval_integral.inv_mul_integral_comp_div_sub intervalIntegral.inv_mul_integral_comp_div_sub
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_sub_div :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (d - x / c)) = ∫ x in d - b / c..d - a / c, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_sub_div f c d
#align interval_integral.inv_mul_integral_comp_sub_div intervalIntegral.inv_mul_integral_comp_sub_div
end intervalIntegral
open intervalIntegral
/-! ### Integrals of simple functions -/
theorem integral_cpow {r : ℂ} (h : -1 < r.re ∨ r ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, (x : ℂ) ^ r) = ((b:ℂ) ^ (r + 1) - (a:ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
rw [sub_div]
have hr : r + 1 ≠ 0 := by
cases' h with h h
· apply_fun Complex.re
rw [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re, Complex.zero_re, Ne, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
exact h.ne'
· rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h; exact h.1
by_cases hab : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]
· apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt (fun x hx => ?_)
(intervalIntegrable_cpow (r := r) <| Or.inr hab)
refine hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx hab) ?_
contrapose! hr; rwa [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
replace h : -1 < r.re := by tauto
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, (∫ x : ℝ in (0)..c, (x : ℂ) ^ r) =
(c:ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) - (0:ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) by
rw [← integral_add_adjacent_intervals (@intervalIntegrable_cpow' a 0 r h)
(@intervalIntegrable_cpow' 0 b r h), integral_symm, this a, this b, Complex.zero_cpow hr]
ring
intro c
apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDeriv_right
· refine ((Complex.continuous_ofReal_cpow_const ?_).div_const _).continuousOn
rwa [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add]
· refine fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow ?_ ?_).hasDerivWithinAt
· rcases le_total c 0 with (hc | hc)
· rw [max_eq_left hc] at hx; exact hx.2.ne
· rw [min_eq_left hc] at hx; exact hx.1.ne'
· contrapose! hr; rw [hr]; ring
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow' h
#align integral_cpow integral_cpow
theorem integral_rpow {r : ℝ} (h : -1 < r ∨ r ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, x ^ r = (b ^ (r + 1) - a ^ (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
have h' : -1 < (r : ℂ).re ∨ (r : ℂ) ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]] := by
cases h
· left; rwa [Complex.ofReal_re]
· right; rwa [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Ne, Complex.ofReal_inj]
have :
(∫ x in a..b, (x : ℂ) ^ (r : ℂ)) = ((b : ℂ) ^ (r + 1 : ℂ) - (a : ℂ) ^ (r + 1 : ℂ)) / (r + 1) :=
integral_cpow h'
apply_fun Complex.re at this; convert this
· simp_rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, Complex.real_smul, Complex.re_ofReal_mul]
-- Porting note: was `change ... with ...`
have : Complex.re = RCLike.re := rfl
rw [this, ← integral_re]
· rfl
refine intervalIntegrable_iff.mp ?_
cases' h' with h' h'
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow' h'
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow (Or.inr h'.2)
· rw [(by push_cast; rfl : (r : ℂ) + 1 = ((r + 1 : ℝ) : ℂ))]
simp_rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← Complex.ofReal_inv, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, Complex.sub_re]
rfl
#align integral_rpow integral_rpow
theorem integral_zpow {n : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ n ∨ n ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, x ^ n = (b ^ (n + 1) - a ^ (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := by
replace h : -1 < (n : ℝ) ∨ (n : ℝ) ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]] := mod_cast h
exact mod_cast integral_rpow h
#align integral_zpow integral_zpow
@[simp]
theorem integral_pow : ∫ x in a..b, x ^ n = (b ^ (n + 1) - a ^ (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := by
simpa only [← Int.ofNat_succ, zpow_natCast] using integral_zpow (Or.inl n.cast_nonneg)
#align integral_pow integral_pow
/-- Integral of `|x - a| ^ n` over `Ι a b`. This integral appears in the proof of the
Picard-Lindelöf/Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem. -/
theorem integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc : ∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by
rcases le_or_lt a b with hab | hab
· calc
∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = ∫ x in a..b, |x - a| ^ n := by
rw [uIoc_of_le hab, ← integral_of_le hab]
_ = ∫ x in (0)..(b - a), x ^ n := by
simp only [integral_comp_sub_right fun x => |x| ^ n, sub_self]
refine integral_congr fun x hx => congr_arg₂ Pow.pow (abs_of_nonneg <| ?_) rfl
rw [uIcc_of_le (sub_nonneg.2 hab)] at hx
exact hx.1
_ = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by simp [abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hab)]
· calc
∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = ∫ x in b..a, |x - a| ^ n := by
rw [uIoc_of_lt hab, ← integral_of_le hab.le]
_ = ∫ x in b - a..0, (-x) ^ n := by
simp only [integral_comp_sub_right fun x => |x| ^ n, sub_self]
refine integral_congr fun x hx => congr_arg₂ Pow.pow (abs_of_nonpos <| ?_) rfl
rw [uIcc_of_le (sub_nonpos.2 hab.le)] at hx
exact hx.2
_ = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by
simp [integral_comp_neg fun x => x ^ n, abs_of_neg (sub_neg.2 hab)]
#align integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc
@[simp]
theorem integral_id : ∫ x in a..b, x = (b ^ 2 - a ^ 2) / 2 := by
have := @integral_pow a b 1
norm_num at this
exact this
#align integral_id integral_id
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem integral_one : (∫ _ in a..b, (1 : ℝ)) = b - a := by
simp only [mul_one, smul_eq_mul, integral_const]
#align integral_one integral_one
theorem integral_const_on_unit_interval : ∫ _ in a..a + 1, b = b := by simp
#align integral_const_on_unit_interval integral_const_on_unit_interval
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv (h : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) : ∫ x in a..b, x⁻¹ = log (b / a) := by
have h' := fun x (hx : x ∈ [[a, b]]) => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub' _ deriv_log' (fun x hx => differentiableAt_log (h' x hx))
(continuousOn_inv₀.mono <| subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr h),
log_div (h' b right_mem_uIcc) (h' a left_mem_uIcc)]
#align integral_inv integral_inv
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : ∫ x in a..b, x⁻¹ = log (b / a) :=
integral_inv <| not_mem_uIcc_of_lt ha hb
#align integral_inv_of_pos integral_inv_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : ∫ x in a..b, x⁻¹ = log (b / a) :=
integral_inv <| not_mem_uIcc_of_gt ha hb
#align integral_inv_of_neg integral_inv_of_neg
theorem integral_one_div (h : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) : ∫ x : ℝ in a..b, 1 / x = log (b / a) := by
simp only [one_div, integral_inv h]
#align integral_one_div integral_one_div
theorem integral_one_div_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x : ℝ in a..b, 1 / x = log (b / a) := by simp only [one_div, integral_inv_of_pos ha hb]
#align integral_one_div_of_pos integral_one_div_of_pos
theorem integral_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) :
∫ x : ℝ in a..b, 1 / x = log (b / a) := by simp only [one_div, integral_inv_of_neg ha hb]
#align integral_one_div_of_neg integral_one_div_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem integral_exp : ∫ x in a..b, exp x = exp b - exp a := by
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub']
· simp
· exact fun _ _ => differentiableAt_exp
· exact continuousOn_exp
#align integral_exp integral_exp
theorem integral_exp_mul_complex {c : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in a..b, Complex.exp (c * x)) = (Complex.exp (c * b) - Complex.exp (c * a)) / c := by
have D : ∀ x : ℝ, HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => Complex.exp (c * y) / c) (Complex.exp (c * x)) x := by
intro x
conv => congr
rw [← mul_div_cancel_right₀ (Complex.exp (c * x)) hc]
apply ((Complex.hasDerivAt_exp _).comp x _).div_const c
simpa only [mul_one] using ((hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)).const_mul _).comp_ofReal
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub' _ (funext fun x => (D x).deriv) fun x _ => (D x).differentiableAt]
· ring
· apply Continuous.continuousOn; continuity
#align integral_exp_mul_complex integral_exp_mul_complex
@[simp]
theorem integral_log (h : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, log x = b * log b - a * log a - b + a := by
have h' := fun x (hx : x ∈ [[a, b]]) => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
have heq := fun x hx => mul_inv_cancel (h' x hx)
convert integral_mul_deriv_eq_deriv_mul (fun x hx => hasDerivAt_log (h' x hx))
(fun x _ => hasDerivAt_id x) (continuousOn_inv₀.mono <|
subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr h).intervalIntegrable
continuousOn_const.intervalIntegrable using 1 <;>
simp [integral_congr heq, mul_comm, ← sub_add]
#align integral_log integral_log
@[simp]
theorem integral_log_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x in a..b, log x = b * log b - a * log a - b + a :=
integral_log <| not_mem_uIcc_of_lt ha hb
#align integral_log_of_pos integral_log_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem integral_log_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) :
∫ x in a..b, log x = b * log b - a * log a - b + a :=
integral_log <| not_mem_uIcc_of_gt ha hb
#align integral_log_of_neg integral_log_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem integral_sin : ∫ x in a..b, sin x = cos a - cos b := by
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub' fun x => -cos x]
· ring
· norm_num
· simp only [differentiableAt_neg_iff, differentiableAt_cos, implies_true]
· exact continuousOn_sin
#align integral_sin integral_sin
@[simp]
theorem integral_cos : ∫ x in a..b, cos x = sin b - sin a := by
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub']
· norm_num
· simp only [differentiableAt_sin, implies_true]
· exact continuousOn_cos
#align integral_cos integral_cos
theorem integral_cos_mul_complex {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (a b : ℝ) :
(∫ x in a..b, Complex.cos (z * x)) = Complex.sin (z * b) / z - Complex.sin (z * a) / z := by
apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt
swap
· apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable
exact Complex.continuous_cos.comp (continuous_const.mul Complex.continuous_ofReal)
intro x _
have a := Complex.hasDerivAt_sin (↑x * z)
have b : HasDerivAt (fun y => y * z : ℂ → ℂ) z ↑x := hasDerivAt_mul_const _
have c : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => Complex.sin (y * z)) _ ↑x := HasDerivAt.comp (𝕜 := ℂ) x a b
have d := HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (c.div_const z)
simp only [mul_comm] at d
convert d using 1
conv_rhs => arg 1; rw [mul_comm]
rw [mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hz]
#align integral_cos_mul_complex integral_cos_mul_complex
theorem integral_cos_sq_sub_sin_sq :
∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2 = sin b * cos b - sin a * cos a := by
simpa only [sq, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg] using
integral_deriv_mul_eq_sub (fun x _ => hasDerivAt_sin x) (fun x _ => hasDerivAt_cos x)
continuousOn_cos.intervalIntegrable continuousOn_sin.neg.intervalIntegrable
#align integral_cos_sq_sub_sin_sq integral_cos_sq_sub_sin_sq
theorem integral_one_div_one_add_sq :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, ↑1 / (↑1 + x ^ 2)) = arctan b - arctan a := by
refine integral_deriv_eq_sub' _ Real.deriv_arctan (fun _ _ => differentiableAt_arctan _)
(continuous_const.div ?_ fun x => ?_).continuousOn
· continuity
· nlinarith
#align integral_one_div_one_add_sq integral_one_div_one_add_sq
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv_one_add_sq : (∫ x : ℝ in a..b, (↑1 + x ^ 2)⁻¹) = arctan b - arctan a := by
simp only [← one_div, integral_one_div_one_add_sq]
#align integral_inv_one_add_sq integral_inv_one_add_sq
section RpowCpow
open Complex
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Integrals.lean | 588 | 615 | theorem integral_mul_cpow_one_add_sq {t : ℂ} (ht : t ≠ -1) :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, (x : ℂ) * ((1:ℂ) + ↑x ^ 2) ^ t) =
((1:ℂ) + (b:ℂ) ^ 2) ^ (t + 1) / (2 * (t + ↑1)) -
((1:ℂ) + (a:ℂ) ^ 2) ^ (t + 1) / (2 * (t + ↑1)) := by |
have : t + 1 ≠ 0 := by contrapose! ht; rwa [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at ht
apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt
· intro x _
have f : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => 1 + y ^ 2) (2 * x : ℂ) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_pow 2 (x : ℂ)).const_add 1
simp
have g :
∀ {z : ℂ}, 0 < z.re → HasDerivAt (fun z => z ^ (t + 1) / (2 * (t + 1))) (z ^ t / 2) z := by
intro z hz
convert (HasDerivAt.cpow_const (c := t + 1) (hasDerivAt_id _)
(Or.inl hz)).div_const (2 * (t + 1)) using 1
field_simp
ring
convert (HasDerivAt.comp (↑x) (g _) f).comp_ofReal using 1
· field_simp; ring
· exact mod_cast add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (sq_nonneg x)
· apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable
refine continuous_ofReal.mul ?_
apply Continuous.cpow
· exact continuous_const.add (continuous_ofReal.pow 2)
· exact continuous_const
· intro a
norm_cast
exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg one_pos <| sq_nonneg a
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Bicategory.Free
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.coherence_tactic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d7987cda72abc473c7cdbbb075170e9ac620042"
/-!
# A `coherence` tactic for bicategories, and `⊗≫` (composition up to associators)
We provide a `bicategory_coherence` tactic,
which proves that any two 2-morphisms (with the same source and target)
in a bicategory which are built out of associators and unitors
are equal.
We also provide `f ⊗≫ g`, the `bicategoricalComp` operation,
which automatically inserts associators and unitors as needed
to make the target of `f` match the source of `g`.
This file mainly deals with the type class setup for the coherence tactic. The actual front end
tactic is given in `Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Coherence` at the same time as the coherence
tactic for monoidal categories.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
universe w v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory
open scoped Bicategory
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
namespace Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence
/-- A typeclass carrying a choice of lift of a 1-morphism from `B` to `FreeBicategory B`. -/
class LiftHom {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) where
/-- A lift of a morphism to the free bicategory.
This should only exist for "structural" morphisms. -/
lift : of.obj a ⟶ of.obj b
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.LiftHom
instance liftHomId : LiftHom (𝟙 a) where lift := 𝟙 (of.obj a)
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom_id Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHomId
instance liftHomComp (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] : LiftHom (f ≫ g) where
lift := LiftHom.lift f ≫ LiftHom.lift g
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom_comp Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHomComp
instance (priority := 100) liftHomOf (f : a ⟶ b) : LiftHom f where lift := of.map f
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom_of Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHomOf
/-- A typeclass carrying a choice of lift of a 2-morphism from `B` to `FreeBicategory B`. -/
class LiftHom₂ {f g : a ⟶ b} [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] (η : f ⟶ g) where
/-- A lift of a 2-morphism to the free bicategory.
This should only exist for "structural" 2-morphisms. -/
lift : LiftHom.lift f ⟶ LiftHom.lift g
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂ Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.LiftHom₂
instance liftHom₂Id (f : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] : LiftHom₂ (𝟙 f) where
lift := 𝟙 _
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_id Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂Id
instance liftHom₂LeftUnitorHom (f : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] : LiftHom₂ (λ_ f).hom where
lift := (λ_ (LiftHom.lift f)).hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_left_unitor_hom Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂LeftUnitorHom
instance liftHom₂LeftUnitorInv (f : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] : LiftHom₂ (λ_ f).inv where
lift := (λ_ (LiftHom.lift f)).inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_left_unitor_inv Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂LeftUnitorInv
instance liftHom₂RightUnitorHom (f : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] : LiftHom₂ (ρ_ f).hom where
lift := (ρ_ (LiftHom.lift f)).hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_right_unitor_hom Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂RightUnitorHom
instance liftHom₂RightUnitorInv (f : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] : LiftHom₂ (ρ_ f).inv where
lift := (ρ_ (LiftHom.lift f)).inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_right_unitor_inv Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂RightUnitorInv
instance liftHom₂AssociatorHom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g]
[LiftHom h] : LiftHom₂ (α_ f g h).hom where
lift := (α_ (LiftHom.lift f) (LiftHom.lift g) (LiftHom.lift h)).hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_associator_hom Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂AssociatorHom
instance liftHom₂AssociatorInv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g]
[LiftHom h] : LiftHom₂ (α_ f g h).inv where
lift := (α_ (LiftHom.lift f) (LiftHom.lift g) (LiftHom.lift h)).inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_associator_inv Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂AssociatorInv
instance liftHom₂Comp {f g h : a ⟶ b} [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [LiftHom h] (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h)
[LiftHom₂ η] [LiftHom₂ θ] : LiftHom₂ (η ≫ θ) where
lift := LiftHom₂.lift η ≫ LiftHom₂.lift θ
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_comp Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂Comp
instance liftHom₂WhiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [LiftHom g]
[LiftHom h] [LiftHom₂ η] : LiftHom₂ (f ◁ η) where
lift := LiftHom.lift f ◁ LiftHom₂.lift η
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_whisker_left Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂WhiskerLeft
instance liftHom₂WhiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [LiftHom₂ η]
{h : b ⟶ c} [LiftHom h] : LiftHom₂ (η ▷ h) where
lift := LiftHom₂.lift η ▷ LiftHom.lift h
#align category_theory.bicategory.lift_hom₂_whisker_right Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.liftHom₂WhiskerRight
/-- A typeclass carrying a choice of bicategorical structural isomorphism between two objects.
Used by the `⊗≫` bicategorical composition operator, and the `coherence` tactic.
-/
class BicategoricalCoherence (f g : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] where
/-- The chosen structural isomorphism between to 1-morphisms. -/
hom' : f ⟶ g
[isIso : IsIso hom']
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence
namespace BicategoricalCoherence
attribute [instance] isIso
-- Porting note: the field `BicategoricalCoherence.hom'` was named `hom` in mathlib3, but in Lean4
-- `f` and `g` are not explicit parameters, so that we have to redefine `hom` as follows
/-- The chosen structural isomorphism between to 1-morphisms. -/
abbrev hom (f g : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [BicategoricalCoherence f g] : f ⟶ g := hom'
attribute [simp] hom hom'
@[simps]
instance refl (f : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] : BicategoricalCoherence f f :=
⟨𝟙 _⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.refl Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.refl
@[simps]
instance whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) (g h : b ⟶ c) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [LiftHom h]
[BicategoricalCoherence g h] : BicategoricalCoherence (f ≫ g) (f ≫ h) :=
⟨f ◁ BicategoricalCoherence.hom g h⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.whisker_left Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.whiskerLeft
@[simps]
instance whiskerRight (f g : a ⟶ b) (h : b ⟶ c) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [LiftHom h]
[BicategoricalCoherence f g] : BicategoricalCoherence (f ≫ h) (g ≫ h) :=
⟨BicategoricalCoherence.hom f g ▷ h⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.whisker_right Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.whiskerRight
@[simps]
instance tensorRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g]
[BicategoricalCoherence (𝟙 b) g] : BicategoricalCoherence f (f ≫ g) :=
⟨(ρ_ f).inv ≫ f ◁ BicategoricalCoherence.hom (𝟙 b) g⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.tensor_right Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.tensorRight
@[simps]
instance tensorRight' (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g]
[BicategoricalCoherence g (𝟙 b)] : BicategoricalCoherence (f ≫ g) f :=
⟨f ◁ BicategoricalCoherence.hom g (𝟙 b) ≫ (ρ_ f).hom⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.tensor_right' Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.tensorRight'
@[simps]
instance left (f g : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [BicategoricalCoherence f g] :
BicategoricalCoherence (𝟙 a ≫ f) g :=
⟨(λ_ f).hom ≫ BicategoricalCoherence.hom f g⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.left Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.left
@[simps]
instance left' (f g : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [BicategoricalCoherence f g] :
BicategoricalCoherence f (𝟙 a ≫ g) :=
⟨BicategoricalCoherence.hom f g ≫ (λ_ g).inv⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.left' Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.left'
@[simps]
instance right (f g : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [BicategoricalCoherence f g] :
BicategoricalCoherence (f ≫ 𝟙 b) g :=
⟨(ρ_ f).hom ≫ BicategoricalCoherence.hom f g⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.right Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.right
@[simps]
instance right' (f g : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [BicategoricalCoherence f g] :
BicategoricalCoherence f (g ≫ 𝟙 b) :=
⟨BicategoricalCoherence.hom f g ≫ (ρ_ g).inv⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.right' Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.right'
@[simps]
instance assoc (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : a ⟶ d) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [LiftHom h]
[LiftHom i] [BicategoricalCoherence (f ≫ g ≫ h) i] :
BicategoricalCoherence ((f ≫ g) ≫ h) i :=
⟨(α_ f g h).hom ≫ BicategoricalCoherence.hom (f ≫ g ≫ h) i⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.assoc Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.assoc
@[simps]
instance assoc' (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : a ⟶ d) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [LiftHom h]
[LiftHom i] [BicategoricalCoherence i (f ≫ g ≫ h)] :
BicategoricalCoherence i ((f ≫ g) ≫ h) :=
⟨BicategoricalCoherence.hom i (f ≫ g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f g h).inv⟩
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_coherence.assoc' Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.BicategoricalCoherence.assoc'
end BicategoricalCoherence
/-- Construct an isomorphism between two objects in a bicategorical category
out of unitors and associators. -/
def bicategoricalIso (f g : a ⟶ b) [LiftHom f] [LiftHom g] [BicategoricalCoherence f g] : f ≅ g :=
asIso (BicategoricalCoherence.hom f g)
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_iso Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.bicategoricalIso
/-- Compose two morphisms in a bicategorical category,
inserting unitors and associators between as necessary. -/
def bicategoricalComp {f g h i : a ⟶ b} [LiftHom g] [LiftHom h] [BicategoricalCoherence g h]
(η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i) : f ⟶ i :=
η ≫ BicategoricalCoherence.hom g h ≫ θ
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_comp Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.bicategoricalComp
-- type as \ot \gg
@[inherit_doc Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.bicategoricalComp]
scoped[CategoryTheory.Bicategory] infixr:80 " ⊗≫ " =>
Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.bicategoricalComp
/-- Compose two isomorphisms in a bicategorical category,
inserting unitors and associators between as necessary. -/
def bicategoricalIsoComp {f g h i : a ⟶ b} [LiftHom g] [LiftHom h] [BicategoricalCoherence g h]
(η : f ≅ g) (θ : h ≅ i) : f ≅ i :=
η ≪≫ asIso (BicategoricalCoherence.hom g h) ≪≫ θ
#align category_theory.bicategory.bicategorical_iso_comp Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.bicategoricalIsoComp
-- type as \ll \ot \gg
@[inherit_doc Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.bicategoricalIsoComp]
scoped[CategoryTheory.Bicategory] infixr:80 " ≪⊗≫ " =>
Mathlib.Tactic.BicategoryCoherence.bicategoricalIsoComp
example {f' : a ⟶ d} {f : a ⟶ b} {g : b ⟶ c} {h : c ⟶ d} {h' : a ⟶ d} (η : f' ⟶ f ≫ g ≫ h)
(θ : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ⟶ h') : f' ⟶ h' :=
η ⊗≫ θ
-- To automatically insert unitors/associators at the beginning or end,
-- you can use `η ⊗≫ 𝟙 _`
example {f' : a ⟶ d} {f : a ⟶ b} {g : b ⟶ c} {h : c ⟶ d} (η : f' ⟶ (f ≫ g) ≫ h) :
f' ⟶ f ≫ g ≫ h :=
η ⊗≫ 𝟙 _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Tactic/CategoryTheory/BicategoryCoherence.lean | 242 | 243 | theorem bicategoricalComp_refl {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) : η ⊗≫ θ = η ≫ θ := by |
dsimp [bicategoricalComp]; simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl, Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Germ
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Algebra
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.ae_eq_fun from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Almost everywhere equal functions
We build a space of equivalence classes of functions, where two functions are treated as identical
if they are almost everywhere equal. We form the set of equivalence classes under the relation of
being almost everywhere equal, which is sometimes known as the `L⁰` space.
To use this space as a basis for the `L^p` spaces and for the Bochner integral, we consider
equivalence classes of strongly measurable functions (or, equivalently, of almost everywhere
strongly measurable functions.)
See `L1Space.lean` for `L¹` space.
## Notation
* `α →ₘ[μ] β` is the type of `L⁰` space, where `α` is a measurable space, `β` is a topological
space, and `μ` is a measure on `α`. `f : α →ₘ β` is a "function" in `L⁰`.
In comments, `[f]` is also used to denote an `L⁰` function.
`ₘ` can be typed as `\_m`. Sometimes it is shown as a box if font is missing.
## Main statements
* The linear structure of `L⁰` :
Addition and scalar multiplication are defined on `L⁰` in the natural way, i.e.,
`[f] + [g] := [f + g]`, `c • [f] := [c • f]`. So defined, `α →ₘ β` inherits the linear structure
of `β`. For example, if `β` is a module, then `α →ₘ β` is a module over the same ring.
See `mk_add_mk`, `neg_mk`, `mk_sub_mk`, `smul_mk`,
`add_toFun`, `neg_toFun`, `sub_toFun`, `smul_toFun`
* The order structure of `L⁰` :
`≤` can be defined in a similar way: `[f] ≤ [g]` if `f a ≤ g a` for almost all `a` in domain.
And `α →ₘ β` inherits the preorder and partial order of `β`.
TODO: Define `sup` and `inf` on `L⁰` so that it forms a lattice. It seems that `β` must be a
linear order, since otherwise `f ⊔ g` may not be a measurable function.
## Implementation notes
* `f.toFun` : To find a representative of `f : α →ₘ β`, use the coercion `(f : α → β)`, which
is implemented as `f.toFun`.
For each operation `op` in `L⁰`, there is a lemma called `coe_fn_op`,
characterizing, say, `(f op g : α → β)`.
* `ae_eq_fun.mk` : To constructs an `L⁰` function `α →ₘ β` from an almost everywhere strongly
measurable function `f : α → β`, use `ae_eq_fun.mk`
* `comp` : Use `comp g f` to get `[g ∘ f]` from `g : β → γ` and `[f] : α →ₘ γ` when `g` is
continuous. Use `comp_measurable` if `g` is only measurable (this requires the
target space to be second countable).
* `comp₂` : Use `comp₂ g f₁ f₂` to get `[fun a ↦ g (f₁ a) (f₂ a)]`.
For example, `[f + g]` is `comp₂ (+)`
## Tags
function space, almost everywhere equal, `L⁰`, ae_eq_fun
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open ENNReal Topology
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric MeasureTheory Function
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ ν : Measure α}
namespace MeasureTheory
section MeasurableSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable (β)
/-- The equivalence relation of being almost everywhere equal for almost everywhere strongly
measurable functions. -/
def Measure.aeEqSetoid (μ : Measure α) : Setoid { f : α → β // AEStronglyMeasurable f μ } :=
⟨fun f g => (f : α → β) =ᵐ[μ] g, fun {f} => ae_eq_refl f.val, fun {_ _} => ae_eq_symm,
fun {_ _ _} => ae_eq_trans⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eq_setoid MeasureTheory.Measure.aeEqSetoid
variable (α)
/-- The space of equivalence classes of almost everywhere strongly measurable functions, where two
strongly measurable functions are equivalent if they agree almost everywhere, i.e.,
they differ on a set of measure `0`. -/
def AEEqFun (μ : Measure α) : Type _ :=
Quotient (μ.aeEqSetoid β)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun MeasureTheory.AEEqFun
variable {α β}
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.AEEqFun]
notation:25 α " →ₘ[" μ "] " β => AEEqFun α β μ
end MeasurableSpace
namespace AEEqFun
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
/-- Construct the equivalence class `[f]` of an almost everywhere measurable function `f`, based
on the equivalence relation of being almost everywhere equal. -/
def mk {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : α →ₘ[μ] β :=
Quotient.mk'' ⟨f, hf⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.mk
/-- Coercion from a space of equivalence classes of almost everywhere strongly measurable
functions to functions. -/
@[coe]
def cast (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : α → β :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.mk _ (Quotient.out' f : { f : α → β // AEStronglyMeasurable f μ }).2
/-- A measurable representative of an `AEEqFun` [f] -/
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →ₘ[μ] β) fun _ => α → β := ⟨cast⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.instCoeFun
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_mk _
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.stronglyMeasurable
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
f.stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem measurable [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : Measurable f :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.measurable_mk _
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.measurable MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.measurable
protected theorem aemeasurable [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
f.measurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.aemeasurable
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk (f : α → β) (hf) :
(Quot.mk (@Setoid.r _ <| μ.aeEqSetoid β) ⟨f, hf⟩ : α →ₘ[μ] β) = mk f hf :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.quot_mk_eq_mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.quot_mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk {f g : α → β} {hf hg} : (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β) = mk g hg ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
Quotient.eq''
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.mk_eq_mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_coeFn (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : mk f f.aestronglyMeasurable = f := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Quotient.out_eq' f]
set g : { f : α → β // AEStronglyMeasurable f μ } := Quotient.out' f
have : g = ⟨g.1, g.2⟩ := Subtype.eq rfl
rw [this, ← mk, mk_eq_mk]
exact (AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk _).symm
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.mk_coe_fn MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.mk_coeFn
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ₘ[μ] β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f = g := by
rwa [← f.mk_coeFn, ← g.mk_coeFn, mk_eq_mk]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.ext MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : α →ₘ[μ] β} : f = g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h], fun h => ext h⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.ext_iff MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.ext_iff
theorem coeFn_mk (f : α → β) (hf) : (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
apply (AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk _).symm.trans
exact @Quotient.mk_out' _ (μ.aeEqSetoid β) (⟨f, hf⟩ : { f // AEStronglyMeasurable f μ })
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.coeFn_mk
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) {p : (α →ₘ[μ] β) → Prop} (H : ∀ f hf, p (mk f hf)) : p f :=
Quotient.inductionOn' f <| Subtype.forall.2 H
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.induction_on MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {α' β' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α'] [TopologicalSpace β'] {μ' : Measure α'}
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) (f' : α' →ₘ[μ'] β') {p : (α →ₘ[μ] β) → (α' →ₘ[μ'] β') → Prop}
(H : ∀ f hf f' hf', p (mk f hf) (mk f' hf')) : p f f' :=
induction_on f fun f hf => induction_on f' <| H f hf
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.induction_on₂ MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.induction_on₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₃ {α' β' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α'] [TopologicalSpace β'] {μ' : Measure α'}
{α'' β'' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α''] [TopologicalSpace β''] {μ'' : Measure α''}
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) (f' : α' →ₘ[μ'] β') (f'' : α'' →ₘ[μ''] β'')
{p : (α →ₘ[μ] β) → (α' →ₘ[μ'] β') → (α'' →ₘ[μ''] β'') → Prop}
(H : ∀ f hf f' hf' f'' hf'', p (mk f hf) (mk f' hf') (mk f'' hf'')) : p f f' f'' :=
induction_on f fun f hf => induction_on₂ f' f'' <| H f hf
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.induction_on₃ MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.induction_on₃
/-!
### Composition of an a.e. equal function with a (quasi) measure preserving function
-/
section compQuasiMeasurePreserving
variable [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {f : α → β}
open MeasureTheory.Measure (QuasiMeasurePreserving)
/-- Composition of an almost everywhere equal function and a quasi measure preserving function.
See also `AEEqFun.compMeasurePreserving`. -/
def compQuasiMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (f : α → β) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
α →ₘ[μ] γ :=
Quotient.liftOn' g (fun g ↦ mk (g ∘ f) <| g.2.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf) fun _ _ h ↦
mk_eq_mk.2 <| h.comp_tendsto hf.tendsto_ae
@[simp]
theorem compQuasiMeasurePreserving_mk {g : β → γ} (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
(mk g hg).compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf = mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf) :=
rfl
theorem compQuasiMeasurePreserving_eq_mk (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf =
mk (g ∘ f) (g.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf) := by
rw [← compQuasiMeasurePreserving_mk g.aestronglyMeasurable hf, mk_coeFn]
theorem coeFn_compQuasiMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f := by
rw [compQuasiMeasurePreserving_eq_mk]
apply coeFn_mk
end compQuasiMeasurePreserving
section compMeasurePreserving
variable [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
/-- Composition of an almost everywhere equal function and a quasi measure preserving function.
This is an important special case of `AEEqFun.compQuasiMeasurePreserving`. We use a separate
definition so that lemmas that need `f` to be measure preserving can be `@[simp]` lemmas. -/
def compMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) : α →ₘ[μ] γ :=
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf.quasiMeasurePreserving
@[simp]
theorem compMeasurePreserving_mk (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
(mk g hg).compMeasurePreserving f hf =
mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf.quasiMeasurePreserving) :=
rfl
theorem compMeasurePreserving_eq_mk (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compMeasurePreserving f hf =
mk (g ∘ f) (g.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf.quasiMeasurePreserving) :=
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving_eq_mk _
theorem coeFn_compMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compMeasurePreserving f hf =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
g.coeFn_compQuasiMeasurePreserving _
end compMeasurePreserving
/-- Given a continuous function `g : β → γ`, and an almost everywhere equal function `[f] : α →ₘ β`,
return the equivalence class of `g ∘ f`, i.e., the almost everywhere equal function
`[g ∘ f] : α →ₘ γ`. -/
def comp (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : α →ₘ[μ] γ :=
Quotient.liftOn' f (fun f => mk (g ∘ (f : α → β)) (hg.comp_aestronglyMeasurable f.2))
fun _ _ H => mk_eq_mk.2 <| H.fun_comp g
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.comp MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_mk (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α → β) (hf) :
comp g hg (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β) = mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hf) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.comp_mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.comp_mk
theorem comp_eq_mk (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) :
comp g hg f = mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_aestronglyMeasurable f.aestronglyMeasurable) := by
rw [← comp_mk g hg f f.aestronglyMeasurable, mk_coeFn]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.comp_eq_mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.comp_eq_mk
theorem coeFn_comp (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : comp g hg f =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f := by
rw [comp_eq_mk]
apply coeFn_mk
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_comp MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.coeFn_comp
theorem comp_compQuasiMeasurePreserving [MeasurableSpace β] {ν} (g : γ → δ) (hg : Continuous g)
(f : β →ₘ[ν] γ) {φ : α → β} (hφ : Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving φ μ ν) :
(comp g hg f).compQuasiMeasurePreserving φ hφ =
comp g hg (f.compQuasiMeasurePreserving φ hφ) := by
rcases f; rfl
section CompMeasurable
variable [MeasurableSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] [OpensMeasurableSpace γ] [SecondCountableTopology γ]
/-- Given a measurable function `g : β → γ`, and an almost everywhere equal function `[f] : α →ₘ β`,
return the equivalence class of `g ∘ f`, i.e., the almost everywhere equal function
`[g ∘ f] : α →ₘ γ`. This requires that `γ` has a second countable topology. -/
def compMeasurable (g : β → γ) (hg : Measurable g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : α →ₘ[μ] γ :=
Quotient.liftOn' f
(fun f' => mk (g ∘ (f' : α → β)) (hg.comp_aemeasurable f'.2.aemeasurable).aestronglyMeasurable)
fun _ _ H => mk_eq_mk.2 <| H.fun_comp g
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.comp_measurable MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.compMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem compMeasurable_mk (g : β → γ) (hg : Measurable g) (f : α → β)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
compMeasurable g hg (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β) =
mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable).aestronglyMeasurable :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.comp_measurable_mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.compMeasurable_mk
theorem compMeasurable_eq_mk (g : β → γ) (hg : Measurable g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) :
compMeasurable g hg f =
mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_aemeasurable f.aemeasurable).aestronglyMeasurable := by
rw [← compMeasurable_mk g hg f f.aestronglyMeasurable, mk_coeFn]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_fun.comp_measurable_eq_mk MeasureTheory.AEEqFun.compMeasurable_eq_mk
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEEqFun.lean | 326 | 329 | theorem coeFn_compMeasurable (g : β → γ) (hg : Measurable g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) :
compMeasurable g hg f =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f := by |
rw [compMeasurable_eq_mk]
apply coeFn_mk
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.CompleteLinearOrder
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.SchroederBernstein
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Cardinal Numbers
We define cardinal numbers as a quotient of types under the equivalence relation of equinumerity.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal` is the type of cardinal numbers (in a given universe).
* `Cardinal.mk α` or `#α` is the cardinality of `α`. The notation `#` lives in the locale
`Cardinal`.
* Addition `c₁ + c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.add_def α β : #α + #β = #(α ⊕ β)`.
* Multiplication `c₁ * c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.mul_def : #α * #β = #(α × β)`.
* The order `c₁ ≤ c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.le_def α β : #α ≤ #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β)`.
* Exponentiation `c₁ ^ c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.power_def α β : #α ^ #β = #(β → α)`.
* `Cardinal.isLimit c` means that `c` is a (weak) limit cardinal: `c ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x < c, succ x < c`.
* `Cardinal.aleph0` or `ℵ₀` is the cardinality of `ℕ`. This definition is universe polymorphic:
`Cardinal.aleph0.{u} : Cardinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in a specific
universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `Cardinal.sum` is the sum of an indexed family of cardinals, i.e. the cardinality of the
corresponding sigma type.
* `Cardinal.prod` is the product of an indexed family of cardinals, i.e. the cardinality of the
corresponding pi type.
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## Main instances
* Cardinals form a `CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring` with the aforementioned sum and product.
* Cardinals form a `SuccOrder`. Use `Order.succ c` for the smallest cardinal greater than `c`.
* The less than relation on cardinals forms a well-order.
* Cardinals form a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot`. Bounded sets for cardinals in universe
`u` are precisely the sets indexed by some type in universe `u`, see
`Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small`. One can use `sSup` for the cardinal supremum, and `sInf` for the
minimum of a set of cardinals.
## Main Statements
* Cantor's theorem: `Cardinal.cantor c : c < 2 ^ c`.
* König's theorem: `Cardinal.sum_lt_prod`
## Implementation notes
* There is a type of cardinal numbers in every universe level:
`Cardinal.{u} : Type (u + 1)` is the quotient of types in `Type u`.
The operation `Cardinal.lift` lifts cardinal numbers to a higher level.
* Cardinal arithmetic specifically for infinite cardinals (like `κ * κ = κ`) is in the file
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean`.
* There is an instance `Pow Cardinal`, but this will only fire if Lean already knows that both
the base and the exponent live in the same universe. As a workaround, you can add
```
local infixr:80 " ^' " => @HPow.hPow Cardinal Cardinal Cardinal _
```
to a file. This notation will work even if Lean doesn't know yet that the base and the exponent
live in the same universe (but no exponents in other types can be used).
(Porting note: This last point might need to be updated.)
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
open scoped Classical
open Function Set Order
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {α β : Type u}
/-- The equivalence relation on types given by equivalence (bijective correspondence) of types.
Quotienting by this equivalence relation gives the cardinal numbers.
-/
instance Cardinal.isEquivalent : Setoid (Type u) where
r α β := Nonempty (α ≃ β)
iseqv := ⟨
fun α => ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩,
fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩,
fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align cardinal.is_equivalent Cardinal.isEquivalent
/-- `Cardinal.{u}` is the type of cardinal numbers in `Type u`,
defined as the quotient of `Type u` by existence of an equivalence
(a bijection with explicit inverse). -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Cardinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Cardinal.isEquivalent
#align cardinal Cardinal
namespace Cardinal
/-- The cardinal number of a type -/
def mk : Type u → Cardinal :=
Quotient.mk'
#align cardinal.mk Cardinal.mk
@[inherit_doc]
scoped prefix:max "#" => Cardinal.mk
instance canLiftCardinalType : CanLift Cardinal.{u} (Type u) mk fun _ => True :=
⟨fun c _ => Quot.inductionOn c fun α => ⟨α, rfl⟩⟩
#align cardinal.can_lift_cardinal_Type Cardinal.canLiftCardinalType
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : Cardinal → Prop} (c : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α, p #α) : p c :=
Quotient.inductionOn c h
#align cardinal.induction_on Cardinal.inductionOn
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(h : ∀ α β, p #α #β) : p c₁ c₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ c₁ c₂ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₂ Cardinal.inductionOn₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(c₃ : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α β γ, p #α #β #γ) : p c₁ c₂ c₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ c₁ c₂ c₃ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₃ Cardinal.inductionOn₃
protected theorem eq : #α = #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'
#align cardinal.eq Cardinal.eq
@[simp]
theorem mk'_def (α : Type u) : @Eq Cardinal ⟦α⟧ #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_def Cardinal.mk'_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (c : Cardinal) : #c.out = c :=
Quotient.out_eq _
#align cardinal.mk_out Cardinal.mk_out
/-- The representative of the cardinal of a type is equivalent to the original type. -/
def outMkEquiv {α : Type v} : (#α).out ≃ α :=
Nonempty.some <| Cardinal.eq.mp (by simp)
#align cardinal.out_mk_equiv Cardinal.outMkEquiv
theorem mk_congr (e : α ≃ β) : #α = #β :=
Quot.sound ⟨e⟩
#align cardinal.mk_congr Cardinal.mk_congr
alias _root_.Equiv.cardinal_eq := mk_congr
#align equiv.cardinal_eq Equiv.cardinal_eq
/-- Lift a function between `Type*`s to a function between `Cardinal`s. -/
def map (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} :=
Quotient.map f fun α β ⟨e⟩ => ⟨hf α β e⟩
#align cardinal.map Cardinal.map
@[simp]
theorem map_mk (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) (α : Type u) :
map f hf #α = #(f α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.map_mk Cardinal.map_mk
/-- Lift a binary operation `Type* → Type* → Type*` to a binary operation on `Cardinal`s. -/
def map₂ (f : Type u → Type v → Type w) (hf : ∀ α β γ δ, α ≃ β → γ ≃ δ → f α γ ≃ f β δ) :
Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{w} :=
Quotient.map₂ f fun α β ⟨e₁⟩ γ δ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨hf α β γ δ e₁ e₂⟩
#align cardinal.map₂ Cardinal.map₂
/-- The universe lift operation on cardinals. You can specify the universes explicitly with
`lift.{u v} : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v u}` -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (c : Cardinal.{v}) : Cardinal.{max v u} :=
map ULift.{u, v} (fun _ _ e => Equiv.ulift.trans <| e.trans Equiv.ulift.symm) c
#align cardinal.lift Cardinal.lift
@[simp]
theorem mk_uLift (α) : #(ULift.{v, u} α) = lift.{v} #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_ulift Cardinal.mk_uLift
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a => inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_umax Cardinal.lift_umax
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- `lift.{max v u, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax' : lift.{max v u, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
lift_umax
#align cardinal.lift_umax' Cardinal.lift_umax'
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- A cardinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_id' (a : Cardinal.{max u v}) : lift.{u} a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_congr Equiv.ulift
#align cardinal.lift_id' Cardinal.lift_id'
/-- A cardinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id (a : Cardinal) : lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_id Cardinal.lift_id
/-- A cardinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id'.{0, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_uzero Cardinal.lift_uzero
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift.{u_1} (a : Cardinal.{u_1}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans <| Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_lift Cardinal.lift_lift
/-- We define the order on cardinal numbers by `#α ≤ #β` if and only if
there exists an embedding (injective function) from α to β. -/
instance : LE Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun q₁ q₂ =>
Quotient.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ (fun α β => Nonempty <| α ↪ β) fun _ _ _ _ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ =>
propext ⟨fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁ e₂⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁.symm e₂.symm⟩⟩⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Cardinal.{u} where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.refl _⟩
le_trans := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact Quotient.sound (e₁.antisymm e₂)
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.partialOrder with
le_total := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩
apply Embedding.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem le_def (α β : Type u) : #α ≤ #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
Iff.rfl
#align cardinal.le_def Cardinal.le_def
theorem mk_le_of_injective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_injective Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.cardinal_le {α β : Type u} (f : α ↪ β) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨f⟩
#align function.embedding.cardinal_le Function.Embedding.cardinal_le
theorem mk_le_of_surjective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : #β ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.ofSurjective f hf⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective Cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_set {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} : c ≤ #α ↔ ∃ p : Set α, #p = c :=
⟨inductionOn c fun _ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ => ⟨Set.range f, (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).cardinal_eq.symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨⟨Subtype.val, fun _ _ => Subtype.eq⟩⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set Cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set
theorem mk_subtype_le {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) : #(Subtype p) ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.subtype p⟩
#align cardinal.mk_subtype_le Cardinal.mk_subtype_le
theorem mk_set_le (s : Set α) : #s ≤ #α :=
mk_subtype_le s
#align cardinal.mk_set_le Cardinal.mk_set_le
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
theorem out_embedding {c c' : Cardinal} : c ≤ c' ↔ Nonempty (c.out ↪ c'.out) := by
trans
· rw [← Quotient.out_eq c, ← Quotient.out_eq c']
· rw [mk'_def, mk'_def, le_def]
#align cardinal.out_embedding Cardinal.out_embedding
theorem lift_mk_le {α : Type v} {β : Type w} :
lift.{max u w} #α ≤ lift.{max u v} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift.symm Equiv.ulift.symm f⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le Cardinal.lift_mk_le
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.lift_mk_le` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_le' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α ≤ lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
lift_mk_le.{0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le' Cardinal.lift_mk_le'
theorem lift_mk_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{max v w} #α = lift.{max u w} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'.trans
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Equiv.ulift.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift.symm⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq Cardinal.lift_mk_eq
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.lift_mk_eq` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_eq' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α = lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
lift_mk_eq.{u, v, 0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq' Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_mk_le.{u}
#align cardinal.lift_le Cardinal.lift_le
-- Porting note: changed `simps` to `simps!` because the linter told to do so.
/-- `Cardinal.lift` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
@[simps! (config := .asFn)]
def liftOrderEmbedding : Cardinal.{v} ↪o Cardinal.{max v u} :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff lift.{u, v} fun _ _ => lift_le
#align cardinal.lift_order_embedding Cardinal.liftOrderEmbedding
theorem lift_injective : Injective lift.{u, v} :=
liftOrderEmbedding.injective
#align cardinal.lift_injective Cardinal.lift_injective
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a = lift.{v, u} b ↔ a = b :=
lift_injective.eq_iff
#align cardinal.lift_inj Cardinal.lift_inj
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a < lift.{v, u} b ↔ a < b :=
liftOrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt
#align cardinal.lift_lt Cardinal.lift_lt
theorem lift_strictMono : StrictMono lift := fun _ _ => lift_lt.2
#align cardinal.lift_strict_mono Cardinal.lift_strictMono
theorem lift_monotone : Monotone lift :=
lift_strictMono.monotone
#align cardinal.lift_monotone Cardinal.lift_monotone
instance : Zero Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PEmpty` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 0)⟩
instance : Inhabited Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero (α : Type u) [IsEmpty α] : #α = 0 :=
(Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero Cardinal.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
#align cardinal.lift_zero Cardinal.lift_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_zero {a : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u} a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' lift_zero
#align cardinal.lift_eq_zero Cardinal.lift_eq_zero
theorem mk_eq_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun e =>
let ⟨h⟩ := Quotient.exact e
h.isEmpty,
@mk_eq_zero α⟩
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff
theorem mk_ne_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α :=
(not_iff_not.2 mk_eq_zero_iff).trans not_isEmpty_iff
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_ne_zero (α : Type u) [Nonempty α] : #α ≠ 0 :=
mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero Cardinal.mk_ne_zero
instance : One Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PUnit` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 1)⟩
instance : Nontrivial Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, mk_ne_zero _⟩⟩
theorem mk_eq_one (α : Type u) [Unique α] : #α = 1 :=
(Equiv.equivOfUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_one Cardinal.mk_eq_one
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
#align cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton Cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
#align set.subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one
instance : Add Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Sum fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.sumCongr⟩
theorem add_def (α β : Type u) : #α + #β = #(Sum α β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.add_def Cardinal.add_def
instance : NatCast Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun n => lift #(Fin n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_sum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α ⊕ β) = lift.{v, u} #α + lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.sumCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_sum Cardinal.mk_sum
@[simp]
theorem mk_option {α : Type u} : #(Option α) = #α + 1 := by
rw [(Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit.{u, u} α).cardinal_eq, mk_sum, mk_eq_one PUnit, lift_id, lift_id]
#align cardinal.mk_option Cardinal.mk_option
@[simp]
theorem mk_psum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(PSum α β) = lift.{v} #α + lift.{u} #β :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.psumEquivSum α β)).trans (mk_sum α β)
#align cardinal.mk_psum Cardinal.mk_psum
@[simp]
theorem mk_fintype (α : Type u) [h : Fintype α] : #α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_congr (Fintype.equivOfCardEq (by simp))
protected theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} (Fin (n+1))) = # (ULift.{u} (Fin n)) + 1
rw [← mk_option, mk_fintype, mk_fintype]
simp only [Fintype.card_ulift, Fintype.card_fin, Fintype.card_option]
instance : Mul Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Prod fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.prodCongr⟩
theorem mul_def (α β : Type u) : #α * #β = #(α × β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mul_def Cardinal.mul_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_prod (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α × β) = lift.{v, u} #α * lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.prodCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_prod Cardinal.mk_prod
private theorem mul_comm' (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : a * b = b * a :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodComm α β
/-- The cardinal exponential. `#α ^ #β` is the cardinal of `β → α`. -/
instance instPowCardinal : Pow Cardinal.{u} Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ (fun α β => β → α) fun _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂ => e₂.arrowCongr e₁⟩
theorem power_def (α β : Type u) : #α ^ #β = #(β → α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.power_def Cardinal.power_def
theorem mk_arrow (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α → β) = (lift.{u} #β^lift.{v} #α) :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_arrow Cardinal.mk_arrow
@[simp]
theorem lift_power (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a ^ b) = lift.{v} a ^ lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.ulift.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_power Cardinal.lift_power
@[simp]
theorem power_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.power_zero Cardinal.power_zero
@[simp]
theorem power_one {a : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^ (1 : Cardinal) = a :=
inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr (Equiv.funUnique (ULift.{u} (Fin 1)) α)
#align cardinal.power_one Cardinal.power_one
theorem power_add {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow β γ α
#align cardinal.power_add Cardinal.power_add
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Cardinal.{u} where
zero := 0
one := 1
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
zero_add a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.emptySum (ULift (Fin 0)) α
add_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))
add_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumAssoc α β γ
add_comm a b := inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumComm α β
zero_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
mul_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
one_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.uniqueProd α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_one a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ
mul_comm := mul_comm'
left_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodSumDistrib α β γ
right_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumProdDistrib α β γ
nsmul := nsmulRec
npow n c := c ^ (n : Cardinal)
npow_zero := @power_zero
npow_succ n c := show c ^ (↑(n + 1) : Cardinal) = c ^ (↑n : Cardinal) * c
by rw [Cardinal.cast_succ, power_add, power_one, mul_comm']
natCast := (fun n => lift.{u} #(Fin n) : ℕ → Cardinal.{u})
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := Cardinal.cast_succ
/-! Porting note (#11229): Deprecated section. Remove. -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem power_bit0 (a b : Cardinal) : a ^ bit0 b = a ^ b * a ^ b :=
power_add
#align cardinal.power_bit0 Cardinal.power_bit0
@[deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem power_bit1 (a b : Cardinal) : a ^ bit1 b = a ^ b * a ^ b * a := by
rw [bit1, ← power_bit0, power_add, power_one]
#align cardinal.power_bit1 Cardinal.power_bit1
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem one_power {a : Cardinal} : (1 : Cardinal) ^ a = 1 :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.one_power Cardinal.one_power
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_bool : #Bool = 2 := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_bool Cardinal.mk_bool
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_Prop : #Prop = 2 := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_Prop Cardinal.mk_Prop
@[simp]
theorem zero_power {a : Cardinal} : a ≠ 0 → (0 : Cardinal) ^ a = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun _ heq =>
mk_eq_zero_iff.2 <|
isEmpty_pi.2 <|
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 heq
⟨a, inferInstance⟩
#align cardinal.zero_power Cardinal.zero_power
theorem power_ne_zero {a : Cardinal} (b : Cardinal) : a ≠ 0 → a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ h =>
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 h
mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ⟨fun _ => a⟩
#align cardinal.power_ne_zero Cardinal.power_ne_zero
theorem mul_power {a b c : Cardinal} : (a * b) ^ c = a ^ c * b ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow α β γ
#align cardinal.mul_power Cardinal.mul_power
theorem power_mul {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
rw [mul_comm b c]
exact inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.curry γ β α
#align cardinal.power_mul Cardinal.power_mul
@[simp]
theorem pow_cast_right (a : Cardinal.{u}) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (↑n : Cardinal.{u}) = a ^ n :=
rfl
#align cardinal.pow_cast_right Cardinal.pow_cast_right
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.lift_one Cardinal.lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_one {a : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u} a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a + b) = lift.{v} a + lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.sumCongr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_add Cardinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a * b) = lift.{v} a * lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.prodCongr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_mul Cardinal.lift_mul
/-! Porting note (#11229): Deprecated section. Remove. -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[simp, deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem lift_bit0 (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (bit0 a) = bit0 (lift.{v} a) :=
lift_add a a
#align cardinal.lift_bit0 Cardinal.lift_bit0
@[simp, deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem lift_bit1 (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (bit1 a) = bit1 (lift.{v} a) := by simp [bit1]
#align cardinal.lift_bit1 Cardinal.lift_bit1
end deprecated
-- Porting note: Proof used to be simp, needed to remind simp that 1 + 1 = 2
theorem lift_two : lift.{u, v} 2 = 2 := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two Cardinal.lift_two
@[simp]
theorem mk_set {α : Type u} : #(Set α) = 2 ^ #α := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two, Set, mk_arrow]
#align cardinal.mk_set Cardinal.mk_set
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.mk_set` expressed in terms of a `Set` instead of a `Type`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_powerset {α : Type u} (s : Set α) : #(↥(𝒫 s)) = 2 ^ #(↥s) :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.Set.powerset s)).trans mk_set
#align cardinal.mk_powerset Cardinal.mk_powerset
theorem lift_two_power (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (2 ^ a) = 2 ^ lift.{v} a := by
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two_power Cardinal.lift_two_power
section OrderProperties
open Sum
protected theorem zero_le : ∀ a : Cardinal, 0 ≤ a := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.ofIsEmpty⟩
#align cardinal.zero_le Cardinal.zero_le
private theorem add_le_add' : ∀ {a b c d : Cardinal}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a + c ≤ b + d := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨δ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨e₁.sumMap e₂⟩
-- #align cardinal.add_le_add' Cardinal.add_le_add'
instance add_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => add_le_add' le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_covariant_class Cardinal.add_covariantClass
instance add_swap_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h => add_le_add' h le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_swap_covariant_class Cardinal.add_swap_covariantClass
instance canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring : CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.partialOrder with
bot := 0
bot_le := Cardinal.zero_le
add_le_add_left := fun a b => add_le_add_left
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ =>
have : Sum α ((range f)ᶜ : Set β) ≃ β :=
(Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.ofInjective f hf) (Equiv.refl _)).trans <|
Equiv.Set.sumCompl (range f)
⟨#(↥(range f)ᶜ), mk_congr this.symm⟩
le_self_add := fun a b => (add_zero a).ge.trans <| add_le_add_left (Cardinal.zero_le _) _
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
simpa only [mul_def, mk_eq_zero_iff, isEmpty_prod] using id }
instance : CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring, Cardinal.linearOrder with }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
instance : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.linearOrder with
mul_le_mul_left := @mul_le_mul_left' _ _ _ _
zero_le_one := zero_le _ }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
-- Porting note: new
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
theorem zero_power_le (c : Cardinal.{u}) : (0 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ c ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : c = 0
· rw [h, power_zero]
· rw [zero_power h]
apply zero_le
#align cardinal.zero_power_le Cardinal.zero_power_le
theorem power_le_power_left : ∀ {a b c : Cardinal}, a ≠ 0 → b ≤ c → a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ hα ⟨e⟩
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 hα
exact ⟨@Function.Embedding.arrowCongrLeft _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ e⟩
#align cardinal.power_le_power_left Cardinal.power_le_power_left
theorem self_le_power (a : Cardinal) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact zero_le _
· convert power_le_power_left ha hb
exact power_one.symm
#align cardinal.self_le_power Cardinal.self_le_power
/-- **Cantor's theorem** -/
theorem cantor (a : Cardinal.{u}) : a < 2 ^ a := by
induction' a using Cardinal.inductionOn with α
rw [← mk_set]
refine ⟨⟨⟨singleton, fun a b => singleton_eq_singleton_iff.1⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
exact cantor_injective f hf
#align cardinal.cantor Cardinal.cantor
instance : NoMaxOrder Cardinal.{u} where exists_gt a := ⟨_, cantor a⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : DistribLattice Cardinal.{u} := inferInstance
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
#align cardinal.one_lt_iff_nontrivial Cardinal.one_lt_iff_nontrivial
theorem power_le_max_power_one {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ max (a ^ c) 1 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha, zero_power_le]
· exact (power_le_power_left ha h).trans (le_max_left _ _)
#align cardinal.power_le_max_power_one Cardinal.power_le_max_power_one
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : Cardinal} : a ≤ b → a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨Embedding.arrowCongrRight e⟩
#align cardinal.power_le_power_right Cardinal.power_le_power_right
theorem power_pos {a : Cardinal} (b : Cardinal) (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b :=
(power_ne_zero _ ha.ne').bot_lt
#align cardinal.power_pos Cardinal.power_pos
end OrderProperties
protected theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Cardinal.{u} (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a =>
by_contradiction fun h => by
let ι := { c : Cardinal // ¬Acc (· < ·) c }
let f : ι → Cardinal := Subtype.val
haveI hι : Nonempty ι := ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
obtain ⟨⟨c : Cardinal, hc : ¬Acc (· < ·) c⟩, ⟨h_1 : ∀ j, (f ⟨c, hc⟩).out ↪ (f j).out⟩⟩ :=
Embedding.min_injective fun i => (f i).out
refine hc (Acc.intro _ fun j h' => by_contradiction fun hj => h'.2 ?_)
have : #_ ≤ #_ := ⟨h_1 ⟨j, hj⟩⟩
simpa only [mk_out] using this⟩
#align cardinal.lt_wf Cardinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨(· < ·), Cardinal.lt_wf⟩
-- Porting note: this no longer is automatically inferred.
instance : WellFoundedLT Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨Cardinal.lt_wf⟩
instance wo : @IsWellOrder Cardinal.{u} (· < ·) where
#align cardinal.wo Cardinal.wo
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Cardinal :=
IsWellOrder.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Cardinal.{u}) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
#align cardinal.Inf_empty Cardinal.sInf_empty
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- Note that the successor of `c` is not the same as `c + 1` except in the case of finite `c`. -/
instance : SuccOrder Cardinal :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun c => sInf { c' | c < c' })
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `by apply` in the next line
⟨by apply lt_of_lt_of_le <| csInf_mem <| exists_gt _,
-- Porting note used to be just `csInf_le'`
fun h ↦ csInf_le' h⟩
theorem succ_def (c : Cardinal) : succ c = sInf { c' | c < c' } :=
rfl
#align cardinal.succ_def Cardinal.succ_def
theorem succ_pos : ∀ c : Cardinal, 0 < succ c :=
bot_lt_succ
#align cardinal.succ_pos Cardinal.succ_pos
theorem succ_ne_zero (c : Cardinal) : succ c ≠ 0 :=
(succ_pos _).ne'
#align cardinal.succ_ne_zero Cardinal.succ_ne_zero
theorem add_one_le_succ (c : Cardinal.{u}) : c + 1 ≤ succ c := by
-- Porting note: rewrote the next three lines to avoid defeq abuse.
have : Set.Nonempty { c' | c < c' } := exists_gt c
simp_rw [succ_def, le_csInf_iff'' this, mem_setOf]
intro b hlt
rcases b, c with ⟨⟨β⟩, ⟨γ⟩⟩
cases' le_of_lt hlt with f
have : ¬Surjective f := fun hn => (not_le_of_lt hlt) (mk_le_of_surjective hn)
simp only [Surjective, not_forall] at this
rcases this with ⟨b, hb⟩
calc
#γ + 1 = #(Option γ) := mk_option.symm
_ ≤ #β := (f.optionElim b hb).cardinal_le
#align cardinal.add_one_le_succ Cardinal.add_one_le_succ
/-- A cardinal is a limit if it is not zero or a successor cardinal. Note that `ℵ₀` is a limit
cardinal by this definition, but `0` isn't.
Use `IsSuccLimit` if you want to include the `c = 0` case. -/
def IsLimit (c : Cardinal) : Prop :=
c ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccLimit c
#align cardinal.is_limit Cardinal.IsLimit
protected theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {c} (h : IsLimit c) : c ≠ 0 :=
h.1
#align cardinal.is_limit.ne_zero Cardinal.IsLimit.ne_zero
protected theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {c} (h : IsLimit c) : IsSuccLimit c :=
h.2
#align cardinal.is_limit.is_succ_limit Cardinal.IsLimit.isSuccLimit
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {x c} (h : IsLimit c) : x < c → succ x < c :=
h.isSuccLimit.succ_lt
#align cardinal.is_limit.succ_lt Cardinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Cardinal) :=
isSuccLimit_bot
#align cardinal.is_succ_limit_zero Cardinal.isSuccLimit_zero
/-- The indexed sum of cardinals is the cardinality of the
indexed disjoint union, i.e. sigma type. -/
def sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : Cardinal :=
mk (Σi, (f i).out)
#align cardinal.sum Cardinal.sum
theorem le_sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) (i) : f i ≤ sum f := by
rw [← Quotient.out_eq (f i)]
exact ⟨⟨fun a => ⟨i, a⟩, fun a b h => by injection h⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_sum Cardinal.le_sum
@[simp]
theorem mk_sigma {ι} (f : ι → Type*) : #(Σ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
mk_congr <| Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun _ => outMkEquiv.symm
#align cardinal.mk_sigma Cardinal.mk_sigma
@[simp]
theorem sum_const (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{v}) :
(sum fun _ : ι => a) = lift.{v} #ι * lift.{u} a :=
inductionOn a fun α =>
mk_congr <|
calc
(Σ _ : ι, Quotient.out #α) ≃ ι × Quotient.out #α := Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _
_ ≃ ULift ι × ULift α := Equiv.ulift.symm.prodCongr (outMkEquiv.trans Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.sum_const Cardinal.sum_const
theorem sum_const' (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{u}) : (sum fun _ : ι => a) = #ι * a := by simp
#align cardinal.sum_const' Cardinal.sum_const'
@[simp]
theorem sum_add_distrib {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) : sum (f + g) = sum f + sum g := by
have := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib (Quotient.out ∘ f) (Quotient.out ∘ g))
simp only [comp_apply, mk_sigma, mk_sum, mk_out, lift_id] at this
exact this
#align cardinal.sum_add_distrib Cardinal.sum_add_distrib
@[simp]
theorem sum_add_distrib' {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) :
(Cardinal.sum fun i => f i + g i) = sum f + sum g :=
sum_add_distrib f g
#align cardinal.sum_add_distrib' Cardinal.sum_add_distrib'
@[simp]
theorem lift_sum {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) :
Cardinal.lift.{w} (Cardinal.sum f) = Cardinal.sum fun i => Cardinal.lift.{w} (f i) :=
Equiv.cardinal_eq <|
Equiv.ulift.trans <|
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun a =>
-- Porting note: Inserted universe hint .{_,_,v} below
Nonempty.some <| by rw [← lift_mk_eq.{_,_,v}, mk_out, mk_out, lift_lift]
#align cardinal.lift_sum Cardinal.lift_sum
theorem sum_le_sum {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : sum f ≤ sum g :=
⟨(Embedding.refl _).sigmaMap fun i =>
Classical.choice <| by have := H i; rwa [← Quot.out_eq (f i), ← Quot.out_eq (g i)] at this⟩
#align cardinal.sum_le_sum Cardinal.sum_le_sum
theorem mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le {c : Cardinal} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ b : β, #(f ⁻¹' {b}) ≤ c) :
#α ≤ #β * c := by
simpa only [← mk_congr (@Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv α β f), mk_sigma, ← sum_const'] using
sum_le_sum _ _ hf
#align cardinal.mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le Cardinal.mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le
theorem lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {c : Cardinal}
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀ b : β, lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' {b}) ≤ c) : lift.{v} #α ≤ lift.{u} #β * c :=
(mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le fun x : ULift.{v} α => ULift.up.{u} (f x.1)) <|
ULift.forall.2 fun b =>
(mk_congr <|
(Equiv.ulift.image _).trans
(Equiv.trans
(by
rw [Equiv.image_eq_preimage]
/- Porting note: Need to insert the following `have` b/c bad fun coercion
behaviour for Equivs -/
have : DFunLike.coe (Equiv.symm (Equiv.ulift (α := α))) = ULift.up (α := α) := rfl
rw [this]
simp only [preimage, mem_singleton_iff, ULift.up_inj, mem_setOf_eq, coe_setOf]
exact Equiv.refl _)
Equiv.ulift.symm)).trans_le
(hf b)
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le Cardinal.lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le
/-- The range of an indexed cardinal function, whose outputs live in a higher universe than the
inputs, is always bounded above. -/
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
⟨_, by
rintro a ⟨i, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: Added universe reference below
exact le_sum.{v,u} f i⟩
#align cardinal.bdd_above_range Cardinal.bddAbove_range
instance (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio a) :=
small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun x h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
suffices (range fun x : ι => (e.symm x).1) = s by
rw [← this]
apply bddAbove_range.{u, u}
ext x
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ⟨e ⟨x, hx⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact (e.symm a).2
· simp_rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]⟩
#align cardinal.bdd_above_iff_small Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
#align cardinal.bdd_above_of_small Cardinal.bddAbove_of_small
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
-- Porting note: added universes below
exact small_lift.{_,v,_} _
#align cardinal.bdd_above_image Cardinal.bddAbove_image
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image.{v,w} g hf
#align cardinal.bdd_above_range_comp Cardinal.bddAbove_range_comp
theorem iSup_le_sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : iSup f ≤ sum f :=
ciSup_le' <| le_sum.{u_2,u_1} _
#align cardinal.supr_le_sum Cardinal.iSup_le_sum
-- Porting note: Added universe hint .{v,_} below
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v,_} #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_range.{u, v} f)
#align cardinal.sum_le_supr_lift Cardinal.sum_le_iSup_lift
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
#align cardinal.sum_le_supr Cardinal.sum_le_iSup
theorem sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ (f : ℕ → Cardinal.{u}) :
Cardinal.sum f = f 0 + Cardinal.sum fun i => f (i + 1) := by
refine (Equiv.sigmaNatSucc fun i => Quotient.out (f i)).cardinal_eq.trans ?_
simp only [mk_sum, mk_out, lift_id, mk_sigma]
#align cardinal.sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ Cardinal.sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ
-- Porting note: LFS is not in normal form.
-- @[simp]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
#align cardinal.supr_of_empty Cardinal.iSup_of_empty
lemma exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit
{ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) (ω : Cardinal.{v})
(hω : ¬ Order.IsSuccLimit ω)
(h : ⨆ i : ι, f i = ω) : ∃ i, f i = ω := by
subst h
refine (isLUB_csSup' ?_).exists_of_not_isSuccLimit hω
contrapose! hω with hf
rw [iSup, csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf, csSup_empty]
exact Order.isSuccLimit_bot
lemma exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isLimit
{ι : Type u} [hι : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(ω : Cardinal.{v}) (hω : ¬ ω.IsLimit)
(h : ⨆ i : ι, f i = ω) : ∃ i, f i = ω := by
refine (not_and_or.mp hω).elim (fun e ↦ ⟨hι.some, ?_⟩)
(Cardinal.exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f ω · h)
cases not_not.mp e
rw [← le_zero_iff] at h ⊢
exact (le_ciSup hf _).trans h
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
-- Porting note: Added .{v,u,w} universe hint below
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink' Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink'
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax', lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink'' Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink''
/-- The indexed product of cardinals is the cardinality of the Pi type
(dependent product). -/
def prod {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal) : Cardinal :=
#(∀ i, (f i).out)
#align cardinal.prod Cardinal.prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_pi {ι : Type u} (α : ι → Type v) : #(∀ i, α i) = prod fun i => #(α i) :=
mk_congr <| Equiv.piCongrRight fun _ => outMkEquiv.symm
#align cardinal.mk_pi Cardinal.mk_pi
@[simp]
theorem prod_const (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{v}) :
(prod fun _ : ι => a) = lift.{u} a ^ lift.{v} #ι :=
inductionOn a fun _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.piCongr Equiv.ulift.symm fun _ => outMkEquiv.trans Equiv.ulift.symm
#align cardinal.prod_const Cardinal.prod_const
theorem prod_const' (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{u}) : (prod fun _ : ι => a) = a ^ #ι :=
inductionOn a fun _ => (mk_pi _).symm
#align cardinal.prod_const' Cardinal.prod_const'
theorem prod_le_prod {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : prod f ≤ prod g :=
⟨Embedding.piCongrRight fun i =>
Classical.choice <| by have := H i; rwa [← mk_out (f i), ← mk_out (g i)] at this⟩
#align cardinal.prod_le_prod Cardinal.prod_le_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_zero {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : prod f = 0 ↔ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
lift f to ι → Type u using fun _ => trivial
simp only [mk_eq_zero_iff, ← mk_pi, isEmpty_pi]
#align cardinal.prod_eq_zero Cardinal.prod_eq_zero
theorem prod_ne_zero {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : prod f ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i ≠ 0 := by simp [prod_eq_zero]
#align cardinal.prod_ne_zero Cardinal.prod_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_prod {ι : Type u} (c : ι → Cardinal.{v}) :
lift.{w} (prod c) = prod fun i => lift.{w} (c i) := by
lift c to ι → Type v using fun _ => trivial
simp only [← mk_pi, ← mk_uLift]
exact mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.trans <| Equiv.piCongrRight fun i => Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.lift_prod Cardinal.lift_prod
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax'.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
#align cardinal.prod_eq_of_fintype Cardinal.prod_eq_of_fintype
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u,v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u,v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
#align cardinal.lift_Inf Cardinal.lift_sInf
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u,v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u,v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
#align cardinal.lift_infi Cardinal.lift_iInf
theorem lift_down {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a → ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
rw [← lift_id #β, ← lift_umax, ← lift_umax.{u, v}, lift_mk_le.{v}]
exact fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨#(Set.range f),
Eq.symm <| lift_mk_eq.{_, _, v}.2
⟨Function.Embedding.equivOfSurjective (Embedding.codRestrict _ f Set.mem_range_self)
fun ⟨a, ⟨b, e⟩⟩ => ⟨b, Subtype.eq e⟩⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_down Cardinal.lift_down
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h
⟨a', e, lift_le.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
#align cardinal.le_lift_iff Cardinal.le_lift_iff
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h.le
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
#align cardinal.lt_lift_iff Cardinal.lt_lift_iff
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a) : lift.{v,u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{v,u} a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨b, e, h⟩
rw [lt_succ_iff, ← lift_le, e] at h
exact h.not_lt (lt_succ _))
(succ_le_of_lt <| lift_lt.2 <| lt_succ a)
#align cardinal.lift_succ Cardinal.lift_succ
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels.
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax_eq {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{v}} :
lift.{max v w} a = lift.{max u w} b ↔ lift.{v} a = lift.{u} b := by
rw [← lift_lift.{v, w, u}, ← lift_lift.{u, w, v}, lift_inj]
#align cardinal.lift_umax_eq Cardinal.lift_umax_eq
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_min {a b : Cardinal} : lift.{u,v} (min a b) = min (lift.{u,v} a) (lift.{u,v} b) :=
lift_monotone.map_min
#align cardinal.lift_min Cardinal.lift_min
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_max {a b : Cardinal} : lift.{u,v} (max a b) = max (lift.{u,v} a) (lift.{u,v} b) :=
lift_monotone.map_max
#align cardinal.lift_max Cardinal.lift_max
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.lift_down (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
#align cardinal.lift_Sup Cardinal.lift_sSup
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp]
#align cardinal.lift_supr Cardinal.lift_iSup
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le Cardinal.lift_iSup_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le_iff Cardinal.lift_iSup_le_iff
universe v' w'
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le_lift_supr Cardinal.lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le_lift_supr' Cardinal.lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup'
/-- `ℵ₀` is the smallest infinite cardinal. -/
def aleph0 : Cardinal.{u} :=
lift #ℕ
#align cardinal.aleph_0 Cardinal.aleph0
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ℵ₀" => Cardinal.aleph0
theorem mk_nat : #ℕ = ℵ₀ :=
(lift_id _).symm
#align cardinal.mk_nat Cardinal.mk_nat
theorem aleph0_ne_zero : ℵ₀ ≠ 0 :=
mk_ne_zero _
#align cardinal.aleph_0_ne_zero Cardinal.aleph0_ne_zero
theorem aleph0_pos : 0 < ℵ₀ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 aleph0_ne_zero
#align cardinal.aleph_0_pos Cardinal.aleph0_pos
@[simp]
theorem lift_aleph0 : lift ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
lift_lift _
#align cardinal.lift_aleph_0 Cardinal.lift_aleph0
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_lift {c : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ lift.{v} c ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
rw [← lift_aleph0.{u,v}, lift_le]
#align cardinal.aleph_0_le_lift Cardinal.aleph0_le_lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_le_aleph0 {c : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v} c ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c ≤ ℵ₀ := by
rw [← lift_aleph0.{u,v}, lift_le]
#align cardinal.lift_le_aleph_0 Cardinal.lift_le_aleph0
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_lift {c : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ < lift.{v} c ↔ ℵ₀ < c := by
rw [← lift_aleph0.{u,v}, lift_lt]
#align cardinal.aleph_0_lt_lift Cardinal.aleph0_lt_lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v} c < ℵ₀ ↔ c < ℵ₀ := by
rw [← lift_aleph0.{u,v}, lift_lt]
#align cardinal.lift_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.lift_lt_aleph0
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
section castFromN
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_fin (n : ℕ) : #(Fin n) = n := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_fin Cardinal.mk_fin
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast (n : ℕ) : lift.{u} (n : Cardinal.{v}) = n := by induction n <;> simp [*]
#align cardinal.lift_nat_cast Cardinal.lift_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u} (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : Cardinal.{v})) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_nat_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} : lift.{v} a = n ↔ a = n :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' (lift_natCast n)
#align cardinal.lift_eq_nat_iff Cardinal.lift_eq_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_ofNat_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{v} a = (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) ↔ a = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_eq_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem nat_eq_lift_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal.{u}} :
(n : Cardinal) = lift.{v} a ↔ (n : Cardinal) = a := by
rw [← lift_natCast.{v,u} n, lift_inj]
#align cardinal.nat_eq_lift_iff Cardinal.nat_eq_lift_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} :
(0 : Cardinal) = lift.{v} a ↔ 0 = a := by
simpa using nat_eq_lift_iff (n := 0)
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} :
(1 : Cardinal) = lift.{v} a ↔ 1 = a := by
simpa using nat_eq_lift_iff (n := 1)
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_eq_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : Cardinal)) = lift.{v} a ↔ (OfNat.ofNat n : Cardinal) = a :=
nat_eq_lift_iff
@[simp]
theorem lift_le_nat_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} : lift.{v} a ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n := by
rw [← lift_natCast.{v,u}, lift_le]
#align cardinal.lift_le_nat_iff Cardinal.lift_le_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem lift_le_one_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} :
lift.{v} a ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
simpa using lift_le_nat_iff (n := 1)
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem lift_le_ofNat_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{v} a ≤ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) ↔ a ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_le_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem nat_le_lift_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal.{u}} : n ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ n ≤ a := by
rw [← lift_natCast.{v,u}, lift_le]
#align cardinal.nat_le_lift_iff Cardinal.nat_le_lift_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} :
(1 : Cardinal) ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
simpa using nat_le_lift_iff (n := 1)
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_le_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : Cardinal)) ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ (OfNat.ofNat n : Cardinal) ≤ a :=
nat_le_lift_iff
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt_nat_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} : lift.{v} a < n ↔ a < n := by
rw [← lift_natCast.{v,u}, lift_lt]
#align cardinal.lift_lt_nat_iff Cardinal.lift_lt_nat_iff
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt_ofNat_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{v} a < (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) ↔ a < OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_lt_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem nat_lt_lift_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal.{u}} : n < lift.{v} a ↔ n < a := by
rw [← lift_natCast.{v,u}, lift_lt]
#align cardinal.nat_lt_lift_iff Cardinal.nat_lt_lift_iff
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,410 | 1,412 | theorem zero_lt_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} :
(0 : Cardinal) < lift.{v} a ↔ 0 < a := by |
simpa using nat_lt_lift_iff (n := 0)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.CompTypeclasses
#align_import algebra.hom.group_action from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e7bab9a85e92cf46c02cb4725a7be2f04691e3a7"
/-!
# Equivariant homomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `MulActionHom φ X Y`, the type of equivariant functions from `X` to `Y`,
where `φ : M → N` is a map, `M` acting on the type `X` and `N` acting on the type of `Y`.
* `DistribMulActionHom φ A B`,
the type of equivariant additive monoid homomorphisms from `A` to `B`,
where `φ : M → N` is a morphism of monoids,
`M` acting on the additive monoid `A` and `N` acting on the additive monoid of `B`
* `SMulSemiringHom φ R S`, the type of equivariant ring homomorphisms
from `R` to `S`, where `φ : M → N` is a morphism of monoids,
`M` acting on the ring `R` and `N` acting on the ring `S`.
The above types have corresponding classes:
* `MulActionHomClass F φ X Y` states that `F` is a type of bundled `X → Y` homs
which are `φ`-equivariant
* `DistribMulActionHomClass F φ A B` states that `F` is a type of bundled `A → B` homs
preserving the additive monoid structure and `φ`-equivariant
* `SMulSemiringHomClass F φ R S` states that `F` is a type of bundled `R → S` homs
preserving the ring structure and `φ`-equivariant
## Notation
We introduce the following notation to code equivariant maps
(the subscript index `ₑ` is for *equivariant*) :
* `X →ₑ[φ] Y` is `MulActionHom φ X Y`.
* `A →ₑ+[φ] B` is `DistribMulActionHom φ A B`.
* `R →ₑ+*[φ] S` is `MulSemiringActionHom φ R S`.
When `M = N` and `φ = MonoidHom.id M`, we provide the backward compatible notation :
* `X →[M] Y` is `MulActionHom (@id M) X Y`
* `A →+[M] B` is `DistribMulActionHom (MonoidHom.id M) A B`
* `R →+*[M] S` is `MulSemiringActionHom (MonoidHom.id M) R S`
-/
assert_not_exists Submonoid
section MulActionHom
variable {M' : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable (φ : M → N) (ψ : N → P) (χ : M → P)
variable (X : Type*) [SMul M X] [SMul M' X]
variable (Y : Type*) [SMul N Y] [SMul M' Y]
variable (Z : Type*) [SMul P Z]
/-- Equivariant functions :
When `φ : M → N` is a function, and types `X` and `Y` are endowed with actions of `M` and `N`,
a function `f : X → Y` is `φ`-equivariant if `f (m • x) = (φ m) • (f x)`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure MulActionHom where
/-- The underlying function. -/
protected toFun : X → Y
/-- The proposition that the function commutes with the actions. -/
protected map_smul' : ∀ (m : M) (x : X), toFun (m • x) = (φ m) • toFun x
/- Porting note: local notation given a name, conflict with Algebra.Hom.GroupAction
see https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2000 -/
/-- `φ`-equivariant functions `X → Y`,
where `φ : M → N`, where `M` and `N` act on `X` and `Y` respectively -/
notation:25 (name := «MulActionHomLocal≺») X " →ₑ[" φ:25 "] " Y:0 => MulActionHom φ X Y
/-- `M`-equivariant functions `X → Y` with respect to the action of `M`
This is the same as `X →ₑ[@id M] Y` -/
notation:25 (name := «MulActionHomIdLocal≺») X " →[" M:25 "] " Y:0 => MulActionHom (@id M) X Y
/-- `MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y` states that
`F` is a type of morphisms which are `φ`-equivariant.
You should extend this class when you extend `MulActionHom`. -/
class MulActionSemiHomClass (F : Type*)
{M N : outParam Type*} (φ : outParam (M → N))
(X Y : outParam Type*) [SMul M X] [SMul N Y] [FunLike F X Y] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves the action. -/
map_smulₛₗ : ∀ (f : F) (c : M) (x : X), f (c • x) = (φ c) • (f x)
#align smul_hom_class MulActionSemiHomClass
export MulActionSemiHomClass (map_smulₛₗ)
/-- `MulActionHomClass F M X Y` states that `F` is a type of
morphisms which are equivariant with respect to actions of `M`
This is an abbreviation of `MulActionSemiHomClass`. -/
abbrev MulActionHomClass (F : Type*) (M : outParam Type*)
(X Y : outParam Type*) [SMul M X] [SMul M Y] [FunLike F X Y] :=
MulActionSemiHomClass F (@id M) X Y
instance : FunLike (MulActionHom φ X Y) X Y where
coe := MulActionHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[simp]
theorem map_smul {F M X Y : Type*} [SMul M X] [SMul M Y]
[FunLike F X Y] [MulActionHomClass F M X Y]
(f : F) (c : M) (x : X) : f (c • x) = c • f x :=
map_smulₛₗ f c x
-- attribute [simp] map_smulₛₗ
-- Porting note: removed has_coe_to_fun instance, coercions handled differently now
#noalign mul_action_hom.has_coe_to_fun
instance : MulActionSemiHomClass (X →ₑ[φ] Y) φ X Y where
map_smulₛₗ := MulActionHom.map_smul'
initialize_simps_projections MulActionHom (toFun → apply)
namespace MulActionHom
variable {φ X Y}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F X Y]
/- porting note: inserted following def & instance for consistent coercion behaviour,
see also Algebra.Hom.Group -/
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y`
into an actual `MulActionHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `MulActionSemiHom φ X Y`. -/
@[coe]
def _root_.MulActionSemiHomClass.toMulActionHom [MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y] (f : F) :
X →ₑ[φ] Y where
toFun := DFunLike.coe f
map_smul' := map_smulₛₗ f
/-- Any type satisfying `MulActionSemiHomClass` can be cast into `MulActionHom` via
`MulActionHomSemiClass.toMulActionHom`. -/
instance [MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y] : CoeTC F (X →ₑ[φ] Y) :=
⟨MulActionSemiHomClass.toMulActionHom⟩
variable (M' X Y F) in
/-- If Y/X/M forms a scalar tower, any map X → Y preserving X-action also preserves M-action. -/
theorem _root_.IsScalarTower.smulHomClass [MulOneClass X] [SMul X Y] [IsScalarTower M' X Y]
[MulActionHomClass F X X Y] : MulActionHomClass F M' X Y where
map_smulₛₗ f m x := by
rw [← mul_one (m • x), ← smul_eq_mul, map_smul, smul_assoc, ← map_smul,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, id_eq]
protected theorem map_smul (f : X →[M'] Y) (m : M') (x : X) : f (m • x) = m • f x :=
map_smul f m x
#align mul_action_hom.map_smul MulActionHom.map_smul
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : X →ₑ[φ] Y} :
(∀ x, f x = g x) → f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g
#align mul_action_hom.ext MulActionHom.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : X →ₑ[φ] Y} :
f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align mul_action_hom.ext_iff MulActionHom.ext_iff
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : X →ₑ[φ] Y} (h : f = g) (x : X) :
f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h _
#align mul_action_hom.congr_fun MulActionHom.congr_fun
/-- Two equal maps on scalars give rise to an equivariant map for identity -/
def ofEq {φ' : M → N} (h : φ = φ') (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) : X →ₑ[φ'] Y where
toFun := f.toFun
map_smul' m a := h ▸ f.map_smul' m a
#align equivariant_map.of_eq MulActionHom.ofEq
@[simp]
theorem ofEq_coe {φ' : M → N} (h : φ = φ') (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) :
(f.ofEq h).toFun = f.toFun := rfl
#align equivariant_map.of_eq_coe MulActionHom.ofEq_coe
@[simp]
theorem ofEq_apply {φ' : M → N} (h : φ = φ') (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) (a : X) :
(f.ofEq h) a = f a :=
rfl
#align equivariant_map.of_eq_apply MulActionHom.ofEq_apply
variable {ψ χ} (M N)
/-- The identity map as an equivariant map. -/
protected def id : X →[M] X :=
⟨id, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align mul_action_hom.id MulActionHom.id
variable {M N Z}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (x : X) :
MulActionHom.id M x = x :=
rfl
#align mul_action_hom.id_apply MulActionHom.id_apply
end MulActionHom
namespace MulActionHom
open MulActionHom
variable {φ ψ χ X Y Z}
-- attribute [instance] CompTriple.id_comp CompTriple.comp_id
/-- Composition of two equivariant maps. -/
def comp (g : Y →ₑ[ψ] Z) (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) [κ : CompTriple φ ψ χ] :
X →ₑ[χ] Z :=
⟨g ∘ f, fun m x =>
calc
g (f (m • x)) = g (φ m • f x) := by rw [map_smulₛₗ]
_ = ψ (φ m) • g (f x) := by rw [map_smulₛₗ]
_ = (ψ ∘ φ) m • g (f x) := rfl
_ = χ m • g (f x) := by rw [κ.comp_eq] ⟩
#align mul_action_hom.comp MulActionHom.comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply
(g : Y →ₑ[ψ] Z) (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) [CompTriple φ ψ χ] (x : X) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
#align mul_action_hom.comp_apply MulActionHom.comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) :
(MulActionHom.id N).comp f = f :=
ext fun x => by rw [comp_apply, id_apply]
#align mul_action_hom.id_comp MulActionHom.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) :
f.comp (MulActionHom.id M) = f :=
ext fun x => by rw [comp_apply, id_apply]
#align mul_action_hom.comp_id MulActionHom.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc {Q T : Type*} [SMul Q T]
{η : P → Q} {θ : M → Q} {ζ : N → Q}
(h : Z →ₑ[η] T) (g : Y →ₑ[ψ] Z) (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y)
[CompTriple φ ψ χ] [CompTriple χ η θ]
[CompTriple ψ η ζ] [CompTriple φ ζ θ] :
h.comp (g.comp f) = (h.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align equivariant_map.comp_assoc MulActionHom.comp_assoc
variable {φ' : N → M}
variable {Y₁ : Type*} [SMul M Y₁]
/-- The inverse of a bijective equivariant map is equivariant. -/
@[simps]
def inverse (f : X →[M] Y₁) (g : Y₁ → X)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) (h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : Y₁ →[M] X where
toFun := g
map_smul' m x :=
calc
g (m • x) = g (m • f (g x)) := by rw [h₂]
_ = g (f (m • g x)) := by simp only [map_smul, id_eq]
_ = m • g x := by rw [h₁]
/-- The inverse of a bijective equivariant map is equivariant. -/
@[simps]
def inverse' (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) (g : Y → X) (k : Function.RightInverse φ' φ)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) (h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) :
Y →ₑ[φ'] X where
toFun := g
map_smul' m x :=
calc
g (m • x) = g (m • f (g x)) := by rw [h₂]
_ = g ((φ (φ' m)) • f (g x)) := by rw [k]
_ = g (f (φ' m • g x)) := by rw [map_smulₛₗ]
_ = φ' m • g x := by rw [h₁]
#align mul_action_hom.inverse MulActionHom.inverse'
lemma inverse_eq_inverse' (f : X →[M] Y₁) (g : Y₁ → X)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) (h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) :
inverse f g h₁ h₂ = inverse' f g (congrFun rfl) h₁ h₂ := by
rfl
theorem inverse'_inverse'
{f : X →ₑ[φ] Y} {g : Y → X}
{k₁ : Function.LeftInverse φ' φ} {k₂ : Function.RightInverse φ' φ}
{h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f} {h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f} :
inverse' (inverse' f g k₂ h₁ h₂) f k₁ h₂ h₁ = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_inverse' {f : X →ₑ[φ] Y } {g : Y → X}
{k₁ : Function.LeftInverse φ' φ} {k₂ : Function.RightInverse φ' φ}
{h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f} {h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f} :
(inverse' f g k₂ h₁ h₂).comp f (κ := CompTriple.comp_inv k₁)
= MulActionHom.id M := by
rw [ext_iff]
intro x
simp only [comp_apply, inverse_apply, id_apply]
exact h₁ x
theorem inverse'_comp {f : X →ₑ[φ] Y } {g : Y → X}
{k₂ : Function.RightInverse φ' φ}
{h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f} {h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f} :
f.comp (inverse' f g k₂ h₁ h₂) (κ := CompTriple.comp_inv k₂) = MulActionHom.id N := by
rw [ext_iff]
intro x
simp only [comp_apply, inverse_apply, id_apply]
exact h₂ x
/-- If actions of `M` and `N` on `α` commute,
then for `c : M`, `(c • · : α → α)` is an `N`-action homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.SMulCommClass.toMulActionHom {M} (N α : Type*)
[SMul M α] [SMul N α] [SMulCommClass M N α] (c : M) :
α →[N] α where
toFun := (c • ·)
map_smul' := smul_comm _
end MulActionHom
end MulActionHom
section DistribMulAction
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M]
variable {N : Type*} [Monoid N]
variable {P : Type*} [Monoid P]
variable (φ: M →* N) (φ' : N →* M) (ψ : N →* P) (χ : M →* P)
variable (A : Type*) [AddMonoid A] [DistribMulAction M A]
variable (B : Type*) [AddMonoid B] [DistribMulAction N B]
variable (B₁ : Type*) [AddMonoid B₁] [DistribMulAction M B₁]
variable (C : Type*) [AddMonoid C] [DistribMulAction P C]
variable (A' : Type*) [AddGroup A'] [DistribMulAction M A']
variable (B' : Type*) [AddGroup B'] [DistribMulAction N B']
/-- Equivariant additive monoid homomorphisms. -/
structure DistribMulActionHom extends A →ₑ[φ] B, A →+ B
#align distrib_mul_action_hom DistribMulActionHom
/-- Reinterpret an equivariant additive monoid homomorphism as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
add_decl_doc DistribMulActionHom.toAddMonoidHom
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.to_add_monoid_hom DistribMulActionHom.toAddMonoidHom
/-- Reinterpret an equivariant additive monoid homomorphism as an equivariant function. -/
add_decl_doc DistribMulActionHom.toMulActionHom
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.to_mul_action_hom DistribMulActionHom.toMulActionHom
/- Porting note: local notation given a name, conflict with Algebra.Hom.Freiman
see https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2000 -/
@[inherit_doc]
notation:25 (name := «DistribMulActionHomLocal≺»)
A " →ₑ+[" φ:25 "] " B:0 => DistribMulActionHom φ A B
@[inherit_doc]
notation:25 (name := «DistribMulActionHomIdLocal≺»)
A " →+[" M:25 "] " B:0 => DistribMulActionHom (MonoidHom.id M) A B
-- QUESTION/TODO : Impose that `φ` is a morphism of monoids?
/-- `DistribMulActionSemiHomClass F φ A B` states that `F` is a type of morphisms
preserving the additive monoid structure and equivariant with respect to `φ`.
You should extend this class when you extend `DistribMulActionSemiHom`. -/
class DistribMulActionSemiHomClass (F : Type*)
{M N : outParam Type*} (φ : outParam (M → N))
(A B : outParam Type*)
[Monoid M] [Monoid N]
[AddMonoid A] [AddMonoid B] [DistribMulAction M A] [DistribMulAction N B]
[FunLike F A B]
extends MulActionSemiHomClass F φ A B, AddMonoidHomClass F A B : Prop
#align distrib_mul_action_hom_class DistribMulActionSemiHomClass
/-- `DistribMulActionHomClass F M A B` states that `F` is a type of morphisms preserving
the additive monoid structure and equivariant with respect to the action of `M`.
It is an abbreviation to `DistribMulActionHomClass F (MonoidHom.id M) A B`
You should extend this class when you extend `DistribMulActionHom`. -/
abbrev DistribMulActionHomClass (F : Type*) (M : outParam Type*)
(A B : outParam Type*) [Monoid M] [AddMonoid A] [AddMonoid B]
[DistribMulAction M A] [DistribMulAction M B] [FunLike F A B] :=
DistribMulActionSemiHomClass F (MonoidHom.id M) A B
/- porting note: Removed a @[nolint dangerousInstance] for
DistribMulActionHomClass.toAddMonoidHomClass not dangerous due to `outParam`s -/
namespace DistribMulActionHom
/- Porting note (#11215): TODO decide whether the next two instances should be removed
Coercion is already handled by all the HomClass constructions I believe -/
-- instance coe : Coe (A →+[M] B) (A →+ B) :=
-- ⟨toAddMonoidHom⟩
-- #align distrib_mul_action_hom.has_coe DistribMulActionHom.coe
-- instance coe' : Coe (A →+[M] B) (A →[M] B) :=
-- ⟨toMulActionHom⟩
-- #align distrib_mul_action_hom.has_coe' DistribMulActionHom.coe'
#noalign distrib_mul_action_hom.has_coe
#noalign distrib_mul_action_hom.has_coe'
#noalign distrib_mul_action_hom.has_coe_to_fun
instance : FunLike (A →ₑ+[φ] B) A B where
coe m := m.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨tF, _, _⟩; rcases g with ⟨tG, _, _⟩
cases tF; cases tG; congr
instance : DistribMulActionSemiHomClass (A →ₑ+[φ] B) φ A B where
map_smulₛₗ m := m.map_smul'
map_zero := DistribMulActionHom.map_zero'
map_add := DistribMulActionHom.map_add'
variable {φ φ' A B B₁}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B]
/- porting note: inserted following def & instance for consistent coercion behaviour,
see also Algebra.Hom.Group -/
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MulActionHomClass F M X Y` into an actual
`MulActionHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `MulActionHom M X Y`. -/
@[coe]
def _root_.DistribMulActionSemiHomClass.toDistribMulActionHom
[DistribMulActionSemiHomClass F φ A B]
(f : F) : A →ₑ+[φ] B :=
{ (f : A →+ B), (f : A →ₑ[φ] B) with }
/-- Any type satisfying `MulActionHomClass` can be cast into `MulActionHom`
via `MulActionHomClass.toMulActionHom`. -/
instance [DistribMulActionSemiHomClass F φ A B] :
CoeTC F (A →ₑ+[φ] B) :=
⟨DistribMulActionSemiHomClass.toDistribMulActionHom⟩
/-- If `DistribMulAction` of `M` and `N` on `A` commute,
then for each `c : M`, `(c • ·)` is an `N`-action additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.SMulCommClass.toDistribMulActionHom {M} (N A : Type*) [Monoid N] [AddMonoid A]
[DistribSMul M A] [DistribMulAction N A] [SMulCommClass M N A] (c : M) : A →+[N] A :=
{ SMulCommClass.toMulActionHom N A c,
DistribSMul.toAddMonoidHom _ c with
toFun := (c • ·) }
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) : f.toFun = f := rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.to_fun_eq_coe DistribMulActionHom.toFun_eq_coe
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_fn_coe (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) : ⇑(f : A →+ B) = f :=
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.coe_fn_coe DistribMulActionHom.coe_fn_coe
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_fn_coe' (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) : ⇑(f : A →ₑ[φ] B) = f :=
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.coe_fn_coe' DistribMulActionHom.coe_fn_coe'
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A →ₑ+[φ] B} : (∀ x, f x = g x) → f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.ext DistribMulActionHom.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : A →ₑ+[φ] B} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.ext_iff DistribMulActionHom.ext_iff
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : A →ₑ+[φ] B} (h : f = g) (x : A) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h _
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.congr_fun DistribMulActionHom.congr_fun
theorem toMulActionHom_injective {f g : A →ₑ+[φ] B} (h : (f : A →ₑ[φ] B) = (g : A →ₑ[φ] B)) :
f = g := by
ext a
exact MulActionHom.congr_fun h a
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.to_mul_action_hom_injective DistribMulActionHom.toMulActionHom_injective
theorem toAddMonoidHom_injective {f g : A →ₑ+[φ] B} (h : (f : A →+ B) = (g : A →+ B)) : f = g := by
ext a
exact DFunLike.congr_fun h a
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.to_add_monoid_hom_injective DistribMulActionHom.toAddMonoidHom_injective
protected theorem map_zero (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) : f 0 = 0 :=
map_zero f
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.map_zero DistribMulActionHom.map_zero
protected theorem map_add (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) (x y : A) : f (x + y) = f x + f y :=
map_add f x y
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.map_add DistribMulActionHom.map_add
protected theorem map_neg (f : A' →ₑ+[φ] B') (x : A') : f (-x) = -f x :=
map_neg f x
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.map_neg DistribMulActionHom.map_neg
protected theorem map_sub (f : A' →ₑ+[φ] B') (x y : A') : f (x - y) = f x - f y :=
map_sub f x y
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.map_sub DistribMulActionHom.map_sub
protected theorem map_smulₑ (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) (m : M) (x : A) : f (m • x) = (φ m) • f x :=
map_smulₛₗ f m x
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.map_smul DistribMulActionHom.map_smulₑ
variable (M)
/-- The identity map as an equivariant additive monoid homomorphism. -/
protected def id : A →+[M] A :=
⟨MulActionHom.id _, rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.id DistribMulActionHom.id
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (x : A) : DistribMulActionHom.id M x = x := by
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.id_apply DistribMulActionHom.id_apply
variable {M C ψ χ}
-- porting note: `simp` used to prove this, but now `change` is needed to push past the coercions
instance : Zero (A →ₑ+[φ] B) :=
⟨{ (0 : A →+ B) with map_smul' := fun m _ => by change (0 : B) = (φ m) • (0 : B); rw [smul_zero]}⟩
instance : One (A →+[M] A) :=
⟨DistribMulActionHom.id M⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : A →ₑ+[φ] B) = 0 :=
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.coe_zero DistribMulActionHom.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : A →+[M] A) = id :=
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.coe_one DistribMulActionHom.coe_one
theorem zero_apply (a : A) : (0 : A →ₑ+[φ] B) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.zero_apply DistribMulActionHom.zero_apply
theorem one_apply (a : A) : (1 : A →+[M] A) a = a :=
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.one_apply DistribMulActionHom.one_apply
instance : Inhabited (A →ₑ+[φ] B) :=
⟨0⟩
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
/-- Composition of two equivariant additive monoid homomorphisms. -/
def comp (g : B →ₑ+[ψ] C) (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) [κ : MonoidHom.CompTriple φ ψ χ] :
A →ₑ+[χ] C :=
{ MulActionHom.comp (g : B →ₑ[ψ] C) (f : A →ₑ[φ] B),
AddMonoidHom.comp (g : B →+ C) (f : A →+ B) with }
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.comp DistribMulActionHom.comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply
(g : B →ₑ+[ψ] C) (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) [MonoidHom.CompTriple φ ψ χ] (x : A) : g.comp f x = g (f x) :=
rfl
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.comp_apply DistribMulActionHom.comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) : comp (DistribMulActionHom.id N) f = f :=
ext fun x => by rw [comp_apply, id_apply]
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.id_comp DistribMulActionHom.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B) : f.comp (DistribMulActionHom.id M) = f :=
ext fun x => by rw [comp_apply, id_apply]
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.comp_id DistribMulActionHom.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc {Q D : Type*} [Monoid Q] [AddMonoid D] [DistribMulAction Q D]
{η : P →* Q} {θ : M →* Q} {ζ : N →* Q}
(h : C →ₑ+[η] D) (g : B →ₑ+[ψ] C) (f : A →ₑ+[φ] B)
[MonoidHom.CompTriple φ ψ χ] [MonoidHom.CompTriple χ η θ]
[MonoidHom.CompTriple ψ η ζ] [MonoidHom.CompTriple φ ζ θ] :
h.comp (g.comp f) = (h.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- The inverse of a bijective `DistribMulActionHom` is a `DistribMulActionHom`. -/
@[simps]
def inverse (f : A →+[M] B₁) (g : B₁ → A) (h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : B₁ →+[M] A :=
{ (f : A →+ B₁).inverse g h₁ h₂, f.toMulActionHom.inverse g h₁ h₂ with toFun := g }
#align distrib_mul_action_hom.inverse DistribMulActionHom.inverse
section Semiring
variable (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [MulSemiringAction M R]
variable (R' : Type*) [Ring R'] [MulSemiringAction M R']
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring S] [MulSemiringAction N S]
variable (S' : Type*) [Ring S'] [MulSemiringAction N S']
variable (T : Type*) [Semiring T] [MulSemiringAction P T]
variable {R S M' N'}
variable [AddMonoid M'] [DistribMulAction R M']
variable [AddMonoid N'] [DistribMulAction S N']
variable {σ : R →* S}
@[ext]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Hom.lean | 600 | 602 | theorem ext_ring {f g : R →ₑ+[σ] N'} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g := by |
ext x
rw [← mul_one x, ← smul_eq_mul R, f.map_smulₑ, g.map_smulₑ, h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
#align_import data.finset.card from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `s.card : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
-- TODO: After a lot more work,
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
#align finset.card Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : s.card = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_def Finset.card_def
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = s.card := rfl
#align finset.card_val Finset.card_val
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : (⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α).card = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
#align finset.card_mk Finset.card_mk
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : card (∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_empty Finset.card_empty
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → s.card ≤ t.card :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
#align finset.card_le_of_subset Finset.card_le_card
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
#align finset.card_mono Finset.card_mono
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : s.card = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : s.card ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma card_pos : 0 < s.card ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
#align finset.card_eq_zero Finset.card_eq_zero
#align finset.card_pos Finset.card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
#align finset.nonempty.card_pos Finset.Nonempty.card_pos
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s.card ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
#align finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem Finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : Finset α) = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
#align finset.card_singleton Finset.card_singleton
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : ({a} ∩ s).card ≤ 1 := by
cases' Finset.decidableMem a s with h h
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.card_singleton_inter Finset.card_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).card = s.card + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
#align finset.card_cons Finset.card_cons
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).card = s.card + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
#align finset.card_insert_of_not_mem Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 111 | 111 | theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : card (insert a s) = s.card := by | rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Int.Order
/-!
# Lemmas for `linarith`.
Those in the `Linarith` namespace should stay here.
Those outside the `Linarith` namespace may be deleted as they are ported to mathlib4.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Linarith
theorem lt_irrefl {α : Type u} [Preorder α] {a : α} : ¬a < a := _root_.lt_irrefl a
| Mathlib/Tactic/Linarith/Lemmas.lean | 27 | 28 | theorem eq_of_eq_of_eq {α} [OrderedSemiring α] {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b = 0 := by |
simp [*]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Combination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.independent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Affine independence
This file defines affinely independent families of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineIndependent` defines affinely independent families of points
as those where no nontrivial weighted subtraction is `0`. This is
proved equivalent to two other formulations: linear independence of
the results of subtracting a base point in the family from the other
points in the family, or any equal affine combinations having the
same weights. A bundled type `Simplex` is provided for finite
affinely independent families of points, with an abbreviation
`Triangle` for the case of three points.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
open scoped Affine
section AffineIndependent
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
/-- An indexed family is said to be affinely independent if no
nontrivial weighted subtractions (where the sum of weights is 0) are
0. -/
def AffineIndependent (p : ι → P) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0
#align affine_independent AffineIndependent
/-- The definition of `AffineIndependent`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_def (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_independent_def affineIndependent_def
/-- A family with at most one point is affinely independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (p : ι → P) : AffineIndependent k p :=
fun _ _ h _ i hi => Fintype.eq_of_subsingleton_of_sum_eq h i hi
#align affine_independent_of_subsingleton affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
/-- A family indexed by a `Fintype` is affinely independent if and
only if no nontrivial weighted subtractions over `Finset.univ` (where
the sum of the weights is 0) are 0. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 0 → Finset.univ.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i, w i = 0 := by
constructor
· exact fun h w hw hs i => h Finset.univ w hw hs i (Finset.mem_univ _)
· intro h s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hs
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hw
replace h := h ((↑s : Set ι).indicator w) hw hs i
simpa [hi] using h
#align affine_independent_iff_of_fintype affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if the differences
from a base point in that family are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub (p : ι → P) (i1 : ι) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ LinearIndependent k fun i : { x // x ≠ i1 } => (p i -ᵥ p i1 : V) := by
classical
constructor
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
set f : ι → k := fun x => if hx : x = i1 then -∑ y ∈ s, g y else g ⟨x, hx⟩ with hfdef
let s2 : Finset ι := insert i1 (s.map (Embedding.subtype _))
have hfg : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, g x = f x := by
intro x
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
erw [dif_neg x.property, Subtype.coe_eta]
rw [hfg]
have hf : ∑ ι ∈ s2, f ι = 0 := by
rw [Finset.sum_insert
(Finset.not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property s (Classical.not_not.2 rfl)),
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => (hfg x).symm]
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos rfl]
exact neg_add_self _
have hs2 : s2.weightedVSub p f = (0 : V) := by
set f2 : ι → V := fun x => f x • (p x -ᵥ p i1) with hf2def
set g2 : { x // x ≠ i1 } → V := fun x => g x • (p x -ᵥ p i1)
have hf2g2 : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, f2 x = g2 x := by
simp only [g2, hf2def]
refine fun x => ?_
rw [hfg]
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s2 f p hf (p i1),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => hf2g2 x]
exact hg
exact h s2 f hf hs2 i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_map.2 ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at h
intro s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p hw (p i1), ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase w p i1, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply] at hs
let f : ι → V := fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i1)
have hs2 : (∑ i ∈ (s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1, f i) = 0 := by
rw [← hs]
convert Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem f fun x => Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
have h2 := h ((s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1) (fun x => w x) hs2
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype] at h2
have h2b : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ i1 → w i = 0 := fun i his hi =>
h2 ⟨i, hi⟩ (Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hi his)
exact Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw h2b i hi
#align affine_independent_iff_linear_independent_vsub affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub
/-- A set is affinely independent if and only if the differences from
a base point in that set are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub {s : Set P} {p₁ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P) ↔
LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → V) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (fun p => p : s → P) ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩]
constructor
· intro h
have hv : ∀ v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}), (v : V) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ s \ {p₁} := fun v =>
(vsub_left_injective p₁).mem_set_image.1 ((vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm ▸ v.property)
let f : (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } := fun x =>
⟨⟨(x : V) +ᵥ p₁, Set.mem_of_mem_diff (hv x)⟩, fun hx =>
Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff (hv x) (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (vadd_right_cancel p₁ (Subtype.ext_iff.1 (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
ext v
exact (vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm
· intro h
let f : { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } → (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) := fun x =>
⟨((x : s) : P) -ᵥ p₁, ⟨x, ⟨⟨(x : s).property, fun hx => x.property (Subtype.ext hx)⟩, rfl⟩⟩⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (vsub_left_cancel (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
#align affine_independent_set_iff_linear_independent_vsub affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub
/-- A set of nonzero vectors is linearly independent if and only if,
given a point `p₁`, the vectors added to `p₁` and `p₁` itself are
affinely independent. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Independent.lean | 164 | 173 | theorem linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton {s : Set V}
(hs : ∀ v ∈ s, v ≠ (0 : V)) (p₁ : P) : LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : s → V) ↔
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : ({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s : Set P) → P) := by |
rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k
(Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton p₁))]
have h : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s) \ {p₁}) = s := by
simp_rw [Set.union_diff_left, Set.image_diff (vsub_left_injective p₁), Set.image_image,
Set.image_singleton, vsub_self, vadd_vsub, Set.image_id']
exact Set.diff_singleton_eq_self fun h => hs 0 h rfl
rw [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.GammaCompN
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.NReflectsIso
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.n_comp_gamma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
/-! The unit isomorphism of the Dold-Kan equivalence
In order to construct the unit isomorphism of the Dold-Kan equivalence,
we first construct natural transformations
`Γ₂N₁.natTrans : N₁ ⋙ Γ₂ ⟶ toKaroubi (SimplicialObject C)` and
`Γ₂N₂.natTrans : N₂ ⋙ Γ₂ ⟶ 𝟭 (SimplicialObject C)`.
It is then shown that `Γ₂N₂.natTrans` is an isomorphism by using
that it becomes an isomorphism after the application of the functor
`N₂ : Karoubi (SimplicialObject C) ⥤ Karoubi (ChainComplex C ℕ)`
which reflects isomorphisms.
(See `Equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan equivalence.)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Idempotents
SimplexCategory Opposite SimplicialObject Simplicial DoldKan
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
theorem PInfty_comp_map_mono_eq_zero (X : SimplicialObject C) {n : ℕ} {Δ' : SimplexCategory}
(i : Δ' ⟶ [n]) [hi : Mono i] (h₁ : Δ'.len ≠ n) (h₂ : ¬Isδ₀ i) :
PInfty.f n ≫ X.map i.op = 0 := by
induction' Δ' using SimplexCategory.rec with m
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt (len_lt_of_mono i fun h => by
rw [← h] at h₁
exact h₁ rfl)
simp only [len_mk] at hk
rcases k with _|k
· change n = m + 1 at hk
subst hk
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ := eq_δ_of_mono i
rw [Isδ₀.iff] at h₂
have h₃ : 1 ≤ (j : ℕ) := by
by_contra h
exact h₂ (by simpa only [Fin.ext_iff, not_le, Nat.lt_one_iff] using h)
exact (HigherFacesVanish.of_P (m + 1) m).comp_δ_eq_zero j h₂ (by omega)
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← add_assoc] at hk
clear h₂ hi
subst hk
obtain ⟨j₁ : Fin (_ + 1), i, rfl⟩ :=
eq_comp_δ_of_not_surjective i fun h => by
have h' := len_le_of_epi (SimplexCategory.epi_iff_surjective.2 h)
dsimp at h'
omega
obtain ⟨j₂, i, rfl⟩ :=
eq_comp_δ_of_not_surjective i fun h => by
have h' := len_le_of_epi (SimplexCategory.epi_iff_surjective.2 h)
dsimp at h'
omega
by_cases hj₁ : j₁ = 0
· subst hj₁
rw [assoc, ← SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ'' (Fin.zero_le _)]
simp only [op_comp, X.map_comp, assoc, PInfty_f]
erw [(HigherFacesVanish.of_P _ _).comp_δ_eq_zero_assoc _ j₂.succ_ne_zero, zero_comp]
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add, Fin.succ]
omega
· simp only [op_comp, X.map_comp, assoc, PInfty_f]
erw [(HigherFacesVanish.of_P _ _).comp_δ_eq_zero_assoc _ hj₁, zero_comp]
by_contra
exact hj₁ (by simp only [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero]; linarith)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_comp_map_mono_eq_zero AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty_comp_map_mono_eq_zero
@[reassoc]
theorem Γ₀_obj_termwise_mapMono_comp_PInfty (X : SimplicialObject C) {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategory}
(i : Δ ⟶ Δ') [Mono i] :
Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono (AlternatingFaceMapComplex.obj X) i ≫ PInfty.f Δ.len =
PInfty.f Δ'.len ≫ X.map i.op := by
induction' Δ using SimplexCategory.rec with n
induction' Δ' using SimplexCategory.rec with n'
dsimp
-- We start with the case `i` is an identity
by_cases h : n = n'
· subst h
simp only [SimplexCategory.eq_id_of_mono i, Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id, op_id, X.map_id]
dsimp
simp only [id_comp, comp_id]
by_cases hi : Isδ₀ i
-- The case `i = δ 0`
· have h' : n' = n + 1 := hi.left
subst h'
simp only [Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_δ₀' _ i hi]
dsimp
rw [← PInfty.comm _ n, AlternatingFaceMapComplex.obj_d_eq]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, id_comp, if_true, Preadditive.comp_sum]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (0 : Fin (n + 2))]
rotate_left
· intro b _ hb
rw [Preadditive.comp_zsmul]
erw [PInfty_comp_map_mono_eq_zero X (SimplexCategory.δ b) h
(by
rw [Isδ₀.iff]
exact hb),
zsmul_zero]
· simp only [Finset.mem_univ, not_true, IsEmpty.forall_iff]
· simp only [hi.eq_δ₀, Fin.val_zero, pow_zero, one_zsmul]
rfl
-- The case `i ≠ δ 0`
· rw [Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_eq_zero _ i _ hi, zero_comp]
swap
· by_contra h'
exact h (congr_arg SimplexCategory.len h'.symm)
rw [PInfty_comp_map_mono_eq_zero]
· exact h
· by_contra h'
exact hi h'
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀_obj_termwise_map_mono_comp_P_infty AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀_obj_termwise_mapMono_comp_PInfty
variable [HasFiniteCoproducts C]
namespace Γ₂N₁
/-- The natural transformation `N₁ ⋙ Γ₂ ⟶ toKaroubi (SimplicialObject C)`. -/
@[simps]
def natTrans : (N₁ : SimplicialObject C ⥤ _) ⋙ Γ₂ ⟶ toKaroubi _ where
app X :=
{ f :=
{ app := fun Δ => (Γ₀.splitting K[X]).desc Δ fun A => PInfty.f A.1.unop.len ≫ X.map A.e.op
naturality := fun Δ Δ' θ => by
apply (Γ₀.splitting K[X]).hom_ext'
intro A
change _ ≫ (Γ₀.obj K[X]).map θ ≫ _ = _
simp only [Splitting.ι_desc_assoc, assoc, Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand'_assoc,
Splitting.ι_desc]
erw [Γ₀_obj_termwise_mapMono_comp_PInfty_assoc X (image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e))]
dsimp only [toKaroubi]
simp only [← X.map_comp]
congr 2
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp, comp_id, ← op_comp]
exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (A.fac_pull θ) }
comm := by
apply (Γ₀.splitting K[X]).hom_ext
intro n
dsimp [N₁]
simp only [← Splitting.cofan_inj_id, Splitting.ι_desc, comp_id, Splitting.ι_desc_assoc,
assoc, PInfty_f_idem_assoc] }
naturality {X Y} f := by
ext1
apply (Γ₀.splitting K[X]).hom_ext
intro n
dsimp [N₁, toKaroubi]
simp only [← Splitting.cofan_inj_id, Splitting.ι_desc, Splitting.ι_desc_assoc, assoc,
PInfty_f_idem_assoc, Karoubi.comp_f, NatTrans.comp_app, Γ₂_map_f_app,
HomologicalComplex.comp_f, AlternatingFaceMapComplex.map_f, PInfty_f_naturality_assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Splitting.IndexSet.id_fst, unop_op, len_mk]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₂N₁.nat_trans AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₂N₁.natTrans
-- Porting note (#10694): added to speed up elaboration
attribute [irreducible] natTrans
end Γ₂N₁
-- Porting note: removed @[simps] attribute because it was creating timeouts
/-- The compatibility isomorphism relating `N₂ ⋙ Γ₂` and `N₁ ⋙ Γ₂`. -/
def Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso : toKaroubi (SimplicialObject C) ⋙ N₂ ⋙ Γ₂ ≅ N₁ ⋙ Γ₂ :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight toKaroubiCompN₂IsoN₁ Γ₂
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.compatibility_Γ₂N₁_Γ₂N₂ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso
@[simp]
lemma Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso_hom_app (X : SimplicialObject C) :
Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso.hom.app X = Γ₂.map (toKaroubiCompN₂IsoN₁.hom.app X) := by
simp [Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso]
@[simp]
lemma Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso_inv_app (X : SimplicialObject C) :
Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso.inv.app X = Γ₂.map (toKaroubiCompN₂IsoN₁.inv.app X) := by
simp [Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso]
-- Porting note (#10694): added to speed up elaboration
attribute [irreducible] Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso
namespace Γ₂N₂
/-- The natural transformation `N₂ ⋙ Γ₂ ⟶ 𝟭 (SimplicialObject C)`. -/
def natTrans : (N₂ : Karoubi (SimplicialObject C) ⥤ _) ⋙ Γ₂ ⟶ 𝟭 _ :=
((whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj (toKaroubi (SimplicialObject C))).preimage
(Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso.hom ≫ Γ₂N₁.natTrans)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₂N₂.nat_trans AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₂N₂.natTrans
theorem natTrans_app_f_app (P : Karoubi (SimplicialObject C)) :
Γ₂N₂.natTrans.app P =
(N₂ ⋙ Γ₂).map P.decompId_i ≫
(Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso.hom ≫ Γ₂N₁.natTrans).app P.X ≫ P.decompId_p := by
dsimp only [natTrans]
simp only [whiskeringLeft_obj_preimage_app, Functor.id_map, assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₂N₂.nat_trans_app_f_app AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₂N₂.natTrans_app_f_app
-- Porting note (#10694): added to speed up elaboration
attribute [irreducible] natTrans
end Γ₂N₂
theorem compatibility_Γ₂N₁_Γ₂N₂_natTrans (X : SimplicialObject C) :
Γ₂N₁.natTrans.app X =
(Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso.app X).inv ≫
Γ₂N₂.natTrans.app ((toKaroubi (SimplicialObject C)).obj X) := by
rw [Γ₂N₂.natTrans_app_f_app]
dsimp only [Karoubi.decompId_i_toKaroubi, Karoubi.decompId_p_toKaroubi, Functor.comp_map,
NatTrans.comp_app]
rw [N₂.map_id, Γ₂.map_id, Iso.app_inv]
dsimp only [toKaroubi]
erw [id_comp]
rw [comp_id, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
theorem identity_N₂_objectwise (P : Karoubi (SimplicialObject C)) :
(N₂Γ₂.inv.app (N₂.obj P) : N₂.obj P ⟶ N₂.obj (Γ₂.obj (N₂.obj P))) ≫
N₂.map (Γ₂N₂.natTrans.app P) = 𝟙 (N₂.obj P) := by
ext n
have eq₁ : (N₂Γ₂.inv.app (N₂.obj P)).f.f n = PInfty.f n ≫ P.p.app (op [n]) ≫
((Γ₀.splitting (N₂.obj P).X).cofan _).inj (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op [n])) := by
simp only [N₂Γ₂_inv_app_f_f, N₂_obj_p_f, assoc]
have eq₂ : ((Γ₀.splitting (N₂.obj P).X).cofan _).inj (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op [n])) ≫
(N₂.map (Γ₂N₂.natTrans.app P)).f.f n = PInfty.f n ≫ P.p.app (op [n]) := by
dsimp
rw [PInfty_on_Γ₀_splitting_summand_eq_self_assoc, Γ₂N₂.natTrans_app_f_app]
dsimp
rw [Γ₂N₂ToKaroubiIso_hom_app, assoc, Splitting.ι_desc_assoc, assoc, assoc]
dsimp [toKaroubi]
rw [Splitting.ι_desc_assoc]
dsimp
simp only [assoc, Splitting.ι_desc_assoc, unop_op, Splitting.IndexSet.id_fst,
len_mk, NatTrans.naturality, PInfty_f_idem_assoc,
PInfty_f_naturality_assoc, app_idem_assoc]
erw [P.X.map_id, comp_id]
simp only [Karoubi.comp_f, HomologicalComplex.comp_f, Karoubi.id_eq, N₂_obj_p_f, assoc,
eq₁, eq₂, PInfty_f_naturality_assoc, app_idem, PInfty_f_idem_assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.identity_N₂_objectwise AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.identity_N₂_objectwise
-- Porting note: `Functor.associator` was added to the statement in order to prevent a timeout
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/NCompGamma.lean | 254 | 260 | theorem identity_N₂ :
(𝟙 (N₂ : Karoubi (SimplicialObject C) ⥤ _) ◫ N₂Γ₂.inv) ≫
(Functor.associator _ _ _).inv ≫ Γ₂N₂.natTrans ◫ 𝟙 (@N₂ C _ _) = 𝟙 N₂ := by |
ext P : 2
dsimp only [NatTrans.comp_app, NatTrans.hcomp_app, Functor.comp_map, Functor.associator,
NatTrans.id_app, Functor.comp_obj]
rw [Γ₂.map_id, N₂.map_id, comp_id, id_comp, id_comp, identity_N₂_objectwise P]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
#align_import computability.tm_to_partrec from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6155d4351090a6fad236e3d2e4e0e4e7342668e8"
/-!
# Modelling partial recursive functions using Turing machines
This file defines a simplified basis for partial recursive functions, and a `Turing.TM2` model
Turing machine for evaluating these functions. This amounts to a constructive proof that every
`Partrec` function can be evaluated by a Turing machine.
## Main definitions
* `ToPartrec.Code`: a simplified basis for partial recursive functions, valued in
`List ℕ →. List ℕ`.
* `ToPartrec.Code.eval`: semantics for a `ToPartrec.Code` program
* `PartrecToTM2.tr`: A TM2 turing machine which can evaluate `code` programs
-/
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
/-!
## A simplified basis for partrec
This section constructs the type `Code`, which is a data type of programs with `List ℕ` input and
output, with enough expressivity to write any partial recursive function. The primitives are:
* `zero'` appends a `0` to the input. That is, `zero' v = 0 :: v`.
* `succ` returns the successor of the head of the input, defaulting to zero if there is no head:
* `succ [] = [1]`
* `succ (n :: v) = [n + 1]`
* `tail` returns the tail of the input
* `tail [] = []`
* `tail (n :: v) = v`
* `cons f fs` calls `f` and `fs` on the input and conses the results:
* `cons f fs v = (f v).head :: fs v`
* `comp f g` calls `f` on the output of `g`:
* `comp f g v = f (g v)`
* `case f g` cases on the head of the input, calling `f` or `g` depending on whether it is zero or
a successor (similar to `Nat.casesOn`).
* `case f g [] = f []`
* `case f g (0 :: v) = f v`
* `case f g (n+1 :: v) = g (n :: v)`
* `fix f` calls `f` repeatedly, using the head of the result of `f` to decide whether to call `f`
again or finish:
* `fix f v = []` if `f v = []`
* `fix f v = w` if `f v = 0 :: w`
* `fix f v = fix f w` if `f v = n+1 :: w` (the exact value of `n` is discarded)
This basis is convenient because it is closer to the Turing machine model - the key operations are
splitting and merging of lists of unknown length, while the messy `n`-ary composition operation
from the traditional basis for partial recursive functions is absent - but it retains a
compositional semantics. The first step in transitioning to Turing machines is to make a sequential
evaluator for this basis, which we take up in the next section.
-/
namespace ToPartrec
/-- The type of codes for primitive recursive functions. Unlike `Nat.Partrec.Code`, this uses a set
of operations on `List ℕ`. See `Code.eval` for a description of the behavior of the primitives. -/
inductive Code
| zero'
| succ
| tail
| cons : Code → Code → Code
| comp : Code → Code → Code
| case : Code → Code → Code
| fix : Code → Code
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align turing.to_partrec.code Turing.ToPartrec.Code
#align turing.to_partrec.code.zero' Turing.ToPartrec.Code.zero'
#align turing.to_partrec.code.succ Turing.ToPartrec.Code.succ
#align turing.to_partrec.code.tail Turing.ToPartrec.Code.tail
#align turing.to_partrec.code.cons Turing.ToPartrec.Code.cons
#align turing.to_partrec.code.comp Turing.ToPartrec.Code.comp
#align turing.to_partrec.code.case Turing.ToPartrec.Code.case
#align turing.to_partrec.code.fix Turing.ToPartrec.Code.fix
/-- The semantics of the `Code` primitives, as partial functions `List ℕ →. List ℕ`. By convention
we functions that return a single result return a singleton `[n]`, or in some cases `n :: v` where
`v` will be ignored by a subsequent function.
* `zero'` appends a `0` to the input. That is, `zero' v = 0 :: v`.
* `succ` returns the successor of the head of the input, defaulting to zero if there is no head:
* `succ [] = [1]`
* `succ (n :: v) = [n + 1]`
* `tail` returns the tail of the input
* `tail [] = []`
* `tail (n :: v) = v`
* `cons f fs` calls `f` and `fs` on the input and conses the results:
* `cons f fs v = (f v).head :: fs v`
* `comp f g` calls `f` on the output of `g`:
* `comp f g v = f (g v)`
* `case f g` cases on the head of the input, calling `f` or `g` depending on whether it is zero or
a successor (similar to `Nat.casesOn`).
* `case f g [] = f []`
* `case f g (0 :: v) = f v`
* `case f g (n+1 :: v) = g (n :: v)`
* `fix f` calls `f` repeatedly, using the head of the result of `f` to decide whether to call `f`
again or finish:
* `fix f v = []` if `f v = []`
* `fix f v = w` if `f v = 0 :: w`
* `fix f v = fix f w` if `f v = n+1 :: w` (the exact value of `n` is discarded)
-/
def Code.eval : Code → List ℕ →. List ℕ
| Code.zero' => fun v => pure (0 :: v)
| Code.succ => fun v => pure [v.headI.succ]
| Code.tail => fun v => pure v.tail
| Code.cons f fs => fun v => do
let n ← Code.eval f v
let ns ← Code.eval fs v
pure (n.headI :: ns)
| Code.comp f g => fun v => g.eval v >>= f.eval
| Code.case f g => fun v => v.headI.rec (f.eval v.tail) fun y _ => g.eval (y::v.tail)
| Code.fix f =>
PFun.fix fun v => (f.eval v).map fun v => if v.headI = 0 then Sum.inl v.tail else Sum.inr v.tail
#align turing.to_partrec.code.eval Turing.ToPartrec.Code.eval
namespace Code
/- Porting note: The equation lemma of `eval` is too strong; it simplifies terms like the LHS of
`pred_eval`. Even `eqns` can't fix this. We removed `simp` attr from `eval` and prepare new simp
lemmas for `eval`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero'_eval : zero'.eval = fun v => pure (0 :: v) := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem succ_eval : succ.eval = fun v => pure [v.headI.succ] := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem tail_eval : tail.eval = fun v => pure v.tail := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem cons_eval (f fs) : (cons f fs).eval = fun v => do {
let n ← Code.eval f v
let ns ← Code.eval fs v
pure (n.headI :: ns) } := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem comp_eval (f g) : (comp f g).eval = fun v => g.eval v >>= f.eval := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem case_eval (f g) :
(case f g).eval = fun v => v.headI.rec (f.eval v.tail) fun y _ => g.eval (y::v.tail) := by
simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem fix_eval (f) : (fix f).eval =
PFun.fix fun v => (f.eval v).map fun v =>
if v.headI = 0 then Sum.inl v.tail else Sum.inr v.tail := by
simp [eval]
/-- `nil` is the constant nil function: `nil v = []`. -/
def nil : Code :=
tail.comp succ
#align turing.to_partrec.code.nil Turing.ToPartrec.Code.nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_eval (v) : nil.eval v = pure [] := by simp [nil]
#align turing.to_partrec.code.nil_eval Turing.ToPartrec.Code.nil_eval
/-- `id` is the identity function: `id v = v`. -/
def id : Code :=
tail.comp zero'
#align turing.to_partrec.code.id Turing.ToPartrec.Code.id
@[simp]
theorem id_eval (v) : id.eval v = pure v := by simp [id]
#align turing.to_partrec.code.id_eval Turing.ToPartrec.Code.id_eval
/-- `head` gets the head of the input list: `head [] = [0]`, `head (n :: v) = [n]`. -/
def head : Code :=
cons id nil
#align turing.to_partrec.code.head Turing.ToPartrec.Code.head
@[simp]
theorem head_eval (v) : head.eval v = pure [v.headI] := by simp [head]
#align turing.to_partrec.code.head_eval Turing.ToPartrec.Code.head_eval
/-- `zero` is the constant zero function: `zero v = [0]`. -/
def zero : Code :=
cons zero' nil
#align turing.to_partrec.code.zero Turing.ToPartrec.Code.zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_eval (v) : zero.eval v = pure [0] := by simp [zero]
#align turing.to_partrec.code.zero_eval Turing.ToPartrec.Code.zero_eval
/-- `pred` returns the predecessor of the head of the input:
`pred [] = [0]`, `pred (0 :: v) = [0]`, `pred (n+1 :: v) = [n]`. -/
def pred : Code :=
case zero head
#align turing.to_partrec.code.pred Turing.ToPartrec.Code.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_eval (v) : pred.eval v = pure [v.headI.pred] := by
simp [pred]; cases v.headI <;> simp
#align turing.to_partrec.code.pred_eval Turing.ToPartrec.Code.pred_eval
/-- `rfind f` performs the function of the `rfind` primitive of partial recursive functions.
`rfind f v` returns the smallest `n` such that `(f (n :: v)).head = 0`.
It is implemented as:
rfind f v = pred (fix (fun (n::v) => f (n::v) :: n+1 :: v) (0 :: v))
The idea is that the initial state is `0 :: v`, and the `fix` keeps `n :: v` as its internal state;
it calls `f (n :: v)` as the exit test and `n+1 :: v` as the next state. At the end we get
`n+1 :: v` where `n` is the desired output, and `pred (n+1 :: v) = [n]` returns the result.
-/
def rfind (f : Code) : Code :=
comp pred <| comp (fix <| cons f <| cons succ tail) zero'
#align turing.to_partrec.code.rfind Turing.ToPartrec.Code.rfind
/-- `prec f g` implements the `prec` (primitive recursion) operation of partial recursive
functions. `prec f g` evaluates as:
* `prec f g [] = [f []]`
* `prec f g (0 :: v) = [f v]`
* `prec f g (n+1 :: v) = [g (n :: prec f g (n :: v) :: v)]`
It is implemented as:
G (a :: b :: IH :: v) = (b :: a+1 :: b-1 :: g (a :: IH :: v) :: v)
F (0 :: f_v :: v) = (f_v :: v)
F (n+1 :: f_v :: v) = (fix G (0 :: n :: f_v :: v)).tail.tail
prec f g (a :: v) = [(F (a :: f v :: v)).head]
Because `fix` always evaluates its body at least once, we must special case the `0` case to avoid
calling `g` more times than necessary (which could be bad if `g` diverges). If the input is
`0 :: v`, then `F (0 :: f v :: v) = (f v :: v)` so we return `[f v]`. If the input is `n+1 :: v`,
we evaluate the function from the bottom up, with initial state `0 :: n :: f v :: v`. The first
number counts up, providing arguments for the applications to `g`, while the second number counts
down, providing the exit condition (this is the initial `b` in the return value of `G`, which is
stripped by `fix`). After the `fix` is complete, the final state is `n :: 0 :: res :: v` where
`res` is the desired result, and the rest reduces this to `[res]`. -/
def prec (f g : Code) : Code :=
let G :=
cons tail <|
cons succ <|
cons (comp pred tail) <|
cons (comp g <| cons id <| comp tail tail) <| comp tail <| comp tail tail
let F := case id <| comp (comp (comp tail tail) (fix G)) zero'
cons (comp F (cons head <| cons (comp f tail) tail)) nil
#align turing.to_partrec.code.prec Turing.ToPartrec.Code.prec
attribute [-simp] Part.bind_eq_bind Part.map_eq_map Part.pure_eq_some
theorem exists_code.comp {m n} {f : Vector ℕ n →. ℕ} {g : Fin n → Vector ℕ m →. ℕ}
(hf : ∃ c : Code, ∀ v : Vector ℕ n, c.eval v.1 = pure <$> f v)
(hg : ∀ i, ∃ c : Code, ∀ v : Vector ℕ m, c.eval v.1 = pure <$> g i v) :
∃ c : Code, ∀ v : Vector ℕ m, c.eval v.1 = pure <$> ((Vector.mOfFn fun i => g i v) >>= f) := by
rsuffices ⟨cg, hg⟩ :
∃ c : Code, ∀ v : Vector ℕ m, c.eval v.1 = Subtype.val <$> Vector.mOfFn fun i => g i v
· obtain ⟨cf, hf⟩ := hf
exact
⟨cf.comp cg, fun v => by
simp [hg, hf, map_bind, seq_bind_eq, Function.comp]
rfl⟩
clear hf f; induction' n with n IH
· exact ⟨nil, fun v => by simp [Vector.mOfFn, Bind.bind]; rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨cg, hg₁⟩ := hg 0
obtain ⟨cl, hl⟩ := IH fun i => hg i.succ
exact
⟨cons cg cl, fun v => by
simp [Vector.mOfFn, hg₁, map_bind, seq_bind_eq, bind_assoc, (· ∘ ·), hl]
rfl⟩
#align turing.to_partrec.code.exists_code.comp Turing.ToPartrec.Code.exists_code.comp
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 285 | 390 | theorem exists_code {n} {f : Vector ℕ n →. ℕ} (hf : Nat.Partrec' f) :
∃ c : Code, ∀ v : Vector ℕ n, c.eval v.1 = pure <$> f v := by |
induction hf with
| prim hf =>
induction hf with
| zero => exact ⟨zero', fun ⟨[], _⟩ => rfl⟩
| succ => exact ⟨succ, fun ⟨[v], _⟩ => rfl⟩
| get i =>
refine Fin.succRec (fun n => ?_) (fun n i IH => ?_) i
· exact ⟨head, fun ⟨List.cons a as, _⟩ => by simp [Bind.bind]; rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨c, h⟩ := IH
exact ⟨c.comp tail, fun v => by simpa [← Vector.get_tail, Bind.bind] using h v.tail⟩
| comp g hf hg IHf IHg =>
simpa [Part.bind_eq_bind] using exists_code.comp IHf IHg
| @prec n f g _ _ IHf IHg =>
obtain ⟨cf, hf⟩ := IHf
obtain ⟨cg, hg⟩ := IHg
simp only [Part.map_eq_map, Part.map_some, PFun.coe_val] at hf hg
refine ⟨prec cf cg, fun v => ?_⟩
rw [← v.cons_head_tail]
specialize hf v.tail
replace hg := fun a b => hg (a ::ᵥ b ::ᵥ v.tail)
simp only [Vector.cons_val, Vector.tail_val] at hf hg
simp only [Part.map_eq_map, Part.map_some, Vector.cons_val, Vector.tail_cons,
Vector.head_cons, PFun.coe_val, Vector.tail_val]
simp only [← Part.pure_eq_some] at hf hg ⊢
induction' v.head with n _ <;>
simp [prec, hf, Part.bind_assoc, ← Part.bind_some_eq_map, Part.bind_some,
show ∀ x, pure x = [x] from fun _ => rfl, Bind.bind, Functor.map]
suffices ∀ a b, a + b = n →
(n.succ :: 0 ::
g (n ::ᵥ Nat.rec (f v.tail) (fun y IH => g (y ::ᵥ IH ::ᵥ v.tail)) n ::ᵥ v.tail) ::
v.val.tail : List ℕ) ∈
PFun.fix
(fun v : List ℕ => Part.bind (cg.eval (v.headI :: v.tail.tail))
(fun x => Part.some (if v.tail.headI = 0
then Sum.inl
(v.headI.succ :: v.tail.headI.pred :: x.headI :: v.tail.tail.tail : List ℕ)
else Sum.inr
(v.headI.succ :: v.tail.headI.pred :: x.headI :: v.tail.tail.tail))))
(a :: b :: Nat.rec (f v.tail) (fun y IH => g (y ::ᵥ IH ::ᵥ v.tail)) a :: v.val.tail) by
erw [Part.eq_some_iff.2 (this 0 n (zero_add n))]
simp only [List.headI, Part.bind_some, List.tail_cons]
intro a b e
induction' b with b IH generalizing a
· refine PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inl <| Part.eq_some_iff.1 ?_)
simp only [hg, ← e, Part.bind_some, List.tail_cons, pure]
rfl
· refine PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, ?_, IH (a + 1) (by rwa [add_right_comm])⟩)
simp only [hg, eval, Part.bind_some, Nat.rec_add_one, List.tail_nil, List.tail_cons, pure]
exact Part.mem_some_iff.2 rfl
| comp g _ _ IHf IHg => exact exists_code.comp IHf IHg
| @rfind n f _ IHf =>
obtain ⟨cf, hf⟩ := IHf; refine ⟨rfind cf, fun v => ?_⟩
replace hf := fun a => hf (a ::ᵥ v)
simp only [Part.map_eq_map, Part.map_some, Vector.cons_val, PFun.coe_val,
show ∀ x, pure x = [x] from fun _ => rfl] at hf ⊢
refine Part.ext fun x => ?_
simp only [rfind, Part.bind_eq_bind, Part.pure_eq_some, Part.map_eq_map, Part.bind_some,
exists_prop, cons_eval, comp_eval, fix_eval, tail_eval, succ_eval, zero'_eval,
List.headI_nil, List.headI_cons, pred_eval, Part.map_some, false_eq_decide_iff,
Part.mem_bind_iff, List.length, Part.mem_map_iff, Nat.mem_rfind, List.tail_nil,
List.tail_cons, true_eq_decide_iff, Part.mem_some_iff, Part.map_bind]
constructor
· rintro ⟨v', h1, rfl⟩
suffices ∀ v₁ : List ℕ, v' ∈ PFun.fix
(fun v => (cf.eval v).bind fun y => Part.some <|
if y.headI = 0 then Sum.inl (v.headI.succ :: v.tail)
else Sum.inr (v.headI.succ :: v.tail)) v₁ →
∀ n, (v₁ = n :: v.val) → (∀ m < n, ¬f (m ::ᵥ v) = 0) →
∃ a : ℕ,
(f (a ::ᵥ v) = 0 ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < a → ¬f (m ::ᵥ v) = 0) ∧ [a] = [v'.headI.pred]
by exact this _ h1 0 rfl (by rintro _ ⟨⟩)
clear h1
intro v₀ h1
refine PFun.fixInduction h1 fun v₁ h2 IH => ?_
clear h1
rintro n rfl hm
have := PFun.mem_fix_iff.1 h2
simp only [hf, Part.bind_some] at this
split_ifs at this with h
· simp only [List.headI_nil, List.headI_cons, exists_false, or_false_iff, Part.mem_some_iff,
List.tail_cons, false_and_iff, Sum.inl.injEq] at this
subst this
exact ⟨_, ⟨h, @(hm)⟩, rfl⟩
· refine IH (n.succ::v.val) (by simp_all) _ rfl fun m h' => ?_
obtain h | rfl := Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 h'
exacts [hm _ h, h]
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨hn, hm⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨n.succ::v.1, ?_, rfl⟩
have : (n.succ::v.1 : List ℕ) ∈
PFun.fix (fun v =>
(cf.eval v).bind fun y =>
Part.some <|
if y.headI = 0 then Sum.inl (v.headI.succ :: v.tail)
else Sum.inr (v.headI.succ :: v.tail))
(n::v.val) :=
PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inl (by simp [hf, hn]))
generalize (n.succ :: v.1 : List ℕ) = w at this ⊢
clear hn
induction' n with n IH
· exact this
refine IH (fun {m} h' => hm (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt h'))
(PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, ?_, this⟩))
simp only [hf, hm n.lt_succ_self, Part.bind_some, List.headI, eq_self_iff_true, if_false,
Part.mem_some_iff, and_self_iff, List.tail_cons]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
#align uniform_space_of_dist UniformSpace.ofDist
-- Porting note: dropped the `dist_self` argument
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun x hx y => hx.elim⟩ (fun s ⟨c, hc⟩ t h => ⟨c, fun x hx y hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
#align bornology.of_dist Bornology.ofDistₓ
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
dist : α → α → ℝ
#align has_dist Dist
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
#noalign pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist_tac -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore
/-- Pseudo metric and Metric spaces
A pseudo metric space is endowed with a distance for which the requirement `d(x,y)=0 → x = y` might
not hold. A metric space is a pseudo metric space such that `d(x,y)=0 → x = y`.
Each pseudo metric space induces a canonical `UniformSpace` and hence a canonical
`TopologicalSpace` This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `UniformSpace`
structure. When instantiating a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure, the uniformity fields are not
necessary, they will be filled in by default. In the same way, each (pseudo) metric space induces a
(pseudo) emetric space structure. It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
-/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends Dist α : Type u where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y)
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add := by _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space PseudoMetricSpace
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with d _ _ _ ed hed U hU B hB
cases' m' with d' _ _ _ ed' hed' U' hU' B' hB'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
#align pseudo_metric_space.ext PseudoMetricSpace.ext
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_edist PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
#align pseudo_metric_space.of_dist_topology PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
#align dist_self dist_self
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
#align dist_comm dist_comm
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
#align edist_dist edist_dist
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
#align dist_triangle dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_left dist_triangle_left
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_right dist_triangle_right
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
#align dist_triangle4 dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_left dist_triangle4_left
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_right dist_triangle4_right
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, dist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
dist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ dist (f m) (f n) + dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_dist dist_le_Ico_sum_dist
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align dist_le_range_sum_dist dist_le_range_sum_dist
/-- A version of `dist_le_Ico_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le
/-- A version of `dist_le_range_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
#align swap_dist swap_dist
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
#align abs_dist_sub_le abs_dist_sub_le
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
#align dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align abs_dist abs_dist
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
#align has_nndist NNDist
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_nndist PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
#align dist_nndist dist_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
#align coe_nndist coe_nndist
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align edist_nndist edist_nndist
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
#align nndist_edist nndist_edist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
#align coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
#align edist_lt_coe edist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align edist_le_coe edist_le_coe
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align edist_lt_top edist_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
#align edist_ne_top edist_ne_top
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
#align nndist_self nndist_self
-- Porting note: `dist_nndist` and `coe_nndist` moved up
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_lt_coe dist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_le_coe dist_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
#align edist_lt_of_real edist_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
#align edist_le_of_real edist_le_ofReal
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align nndist_dist nndist_dist
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
#align nndist_comm nndist_comm
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle nndist_triangle
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_left nndist_triangle_left
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_right nndist_triangle_right
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
#align dist_edist dist_edist
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
#align metric.ball Metric.ball
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_ball Metric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball' Metric.mem_ball'
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
#align metric.pos_of_mem_ball Metric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_ball_self Metric.mem_ball_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_ball Metric.nonempty_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
#align metric.ball_eq_empty Metric.ball_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
#align metric.ball_zero Metric.ball_zero
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball Metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
#align metric.ball_eq_ball Metric.ball_eq_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
#align metric.ball_eq_ball' Metric.ball_eq_ball'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat Metric.iUnion_ball_nat
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
#align metric.Union_ball_nat_succ Metric.iUnion_ball_nat_succ
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
#align metric.closed_ball Metric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_closed_ball Metric.mem_closedBall
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PseudoMetric.lean | 474 | 474 | theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by | rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alena Gusakov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alena Gusakov, Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.DoubleCounting
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.AdjMatrix
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.strongly_regular from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2b35fc7bea4640cb75e477e83f32fbd538920822"
/-!
# Strongly regular graphs
## Main definitions
* `G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ` (see `SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith`) is a structure for
a `SimpleGraph` satisfying the following conditions:
* The cardinality of the vertex set is `n`
* `G` is a regular graph with degree `k`
* The number of common neighbors between any two adjacent vertices in `G` is `ℓ`
* The number of common neighbors between any two nonadjacent vertices in `G` is `μ`
## Main theorems
* `IsSRGWith.compl`: the complement of a strongly regular graph is strongly regular.
* `IsSRGWith.param_eq`: `k * (k - ℓ - 1) = (n - k - 1) * μ` when `0 < n`.
* `IsSRGWith.matrix_eq`: let `A` and `C` be `G`'s and `Gᶜ`'s adjacency matrices respectively and
`I` be the identity matrix, then `A ^ 2 = k • I + ℓ • A + μ • C`.
-/
open Finset
universe u
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
/-- A graph is strongly regular with parameters `n k ℓ μ` if
* its vertex set has cardinality `n`
* it is regular with degree `k`
* every pair of adjacent vertices has `ℓ` common neighbors
* every pair of nonadjacent vertices has `μ` common neighbors
-/
structure IsSRGWith (n k ℓ μ : ℕ) : Prop where
card : Fintype.card V = n
regular : G.IsRegularOfDegree k
of_adj : ∀ v w : V, G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = ℓ
of_not_adj : Pairwise fun v w => ¬G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = μ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith
variable {G} {n k ℓ μ : ℕ}
/-- Empty graphs are strongly regular. Note that `ℓ` can take any value
for empty graphs, since there are no pairs of adjacent vertices. -/
theorem bot_strongly_regular : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) 0 ℓ 0 where
card := rfl
regular := bot_degree
of_adj := fun v w h => h.elim
of_not_adj := fun v w _h => by
simp only [card_eq_zero, Fintype.card_ofFinset, forall_true_left, not_false_iff, bot_adj]
ext
simp [mem_commonNeighbors]
#align simple_graph.bot_strongly_regular SimpleGraph.bot_strongly_regular
/-- Complete graphs are strongly regular. Note that `μ` can take any value
for complete graphs, since there are no distinct pairs of non-adjacent vertices. -/
theorem IsSRGWith.top :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) (Fintype.card V - 1) (Fintype.card V - 2) μ where
card := rfl
regular := IsRegularOfDegree.top
of_adj := fun v w h => by
rw [card_commonNeighbors_top]
exact h
of_not_adj := fun v w h h' => False.elim (h' ((top_adj v w).2 h))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.top SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.top
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_eq {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ) :
(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card =
2 * k - Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) := by
apply Nat.add_right_cancel (m := Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w))
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel, ← Set.toFinset_card]
-- Porting note: Set.toFinset_inter needs workaround to use unification to solve for one of the
-- instance arguments:
· simp [commonNeighbors, @Set.toFinset_inter _ _ _ _ _ _ (_),
← neighborFinset_def, Finset.card_union_add_card_inter, card_neighborFinset_eq_degree,
h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
· apply le_trans (card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left _ _ _)
simp [h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.card_neighbor_finset_union_eq SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
/-- Assuming `G` is strongly regular, `2*(k + 1) - m` in `G` is the number of vertices that are
adjacent to either `v` or `w` when `¬G.Adj v w`. So it's the cardinality of
`G.neighborSet v ∪ G.neighborSet w`. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/StronglyRegular.lean | 102 | 106 | theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_not_adj {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ)
(hne : v ≠ w) (ha : ¬G.Adj v w) :
(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card = 2 * k - μ := by |
rw [← h.of_not_adj hne ha]
apply h.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
#align real.log Real.log
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
#align real.log_of_ne_zero Real.log_of_ne_zero
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.log_of_pos Real.log_of_pos
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align real.exp_log_eq_abs Real.exp_log_eq_abs
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.exp_log Real.exp_log
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
#align real.exp_log_of_neg Real.exp_log_of_neg
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
#align real.le_exp_log Real.le_exp_log
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
#align real.log_exp Real.log_exp
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.surj_on_log Real.surjOn_log
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.log_surjective Real.log_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
#align real.range_log Real.range_log
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align real.log_zero Real.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
#align real.log_one Real.log_one
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
#align real.log_abs Real.log_abs
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
#align real.log_neg_eq_log Real.log_neg_eq_log
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.sinh_log Real.sinh_log
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 118 | 119 | theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by |
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Order.WellFoundedSet
#align_import ring_theory.hahn_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a484a7d0eade4e1268f4fb402859b6686037f965"
/-!
# Hahn Series
If `Γ` is ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of formal series over `Γ` with
coefficients in `R`, whose supports are partially well-ordered. With further structure on `R` and
`Γ`, we can add further structure on `HahnSeries Γ R`, with the most studied case being when `Γ` is
a linearly ordered abelian group and `R` is a field, in which case `HahnSeries Γ R` is a
valued field, with value group `Γ`.
These generalize Laurent series (with value group `ℤ`), and Laurent series are implemented that way
in the file `RingTheory/LaurentSeries`.
## Main Definitions
* If `Γ` is ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of
formal series over `Γ` with coefficients in `R`, whose supports are partially well-ordered.
* `support x` is the subset of `Γ` whose coefficients are nonzero.
* `single a r` is the Hahn series which has coefficient `r` at `a` and zero otherwise.
* `orderTop x` is a minimal element of `WithTop Γ` where `x` has a nonzero
coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is `⊤` when `x = 0`.
* `order x` is a minimal element of `Γ` where `x` has a nonzero coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is zero
when `x = 0`.
## References
- [J. van der Hoeven, *Operators on Generalized Power Series*][van_der_hoeven]
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Finset Function
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
/-- If `Γ` is linearly ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of
formal series over `Γ` with coefficients in `R`, whose supports are well-founded. -/
@[ext]
structure HahnSeries (Γ : Type*) (R : Type*) [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R] where
/-- The coefficient function of a Hahn Series. -/
coeff : Γ → R
isPWO_support' : (Function.support coeff).IsPWO
#align hahn_series HahnSeries
variable {Γ : Type*} {R : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Zero
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : HahnSeries Γ R → Γ → R) :=
HahnSeries.ext
#align hahn_series.coeff_injective HahnSeries.coeff_injective
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj {x y : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = y.coeff ↔ x = y :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
#align hahn_series.coeff_inj HahnSeries.coeff_inj
/-- The support of a Hahn series is just the set of indices whose coefficients are nonzero.
Notably, it is well-founded. -/
nonrec def support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Set Γ :=
support x.coeff
#align hahn_series.support HahnSeries.support
@[simp]
theorem isPWO_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsPWO :=
x.isPWO_support'
#align hahn_series.is_pwo_support HahnSeries.isPWO_support
@[simp]
theorem isWF_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsWF :=
x.isPWO_support.isWF
#align hahn_series.is_wf_support HahnSeries.isWF_support
@[simp]
theorem mem_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) (a : Γ) : a ∈ x.support ↔ x.coeff a ≠ 0 :=
Iff.refl _
#align hahn_series.mem_support HahnSeries.mem_support
instance : Zero (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨{ coeff := 0
isPWO_support' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨fun a b => a.ext b (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_coeff {a : Γ} : (0 : HahnSeries Γ R).coeff a = 0 :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.zero_coeff HahnSeries.zero_coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff' rfl
#align hahn_series.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff HahnSeries.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
mt (fun x0 => (x0.symm ▸ zero_coeff : x.coeff g = 0)) h
#align hahn_series.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero HahnSeries.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : support (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ∅ :=
Function.support_zero
#align hahn_series.support_zero HahnSeries.support_zero
@[simp]
nonrec theorem support_nonempty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support.Nonempty ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [support, support_nonempty_iff, Ne, coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff]
#align hahn_series.support_nonempty_iff HahnSeries.support_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support = ∅ ↔ x = 0 :=
support_eq_empty_iff.trans coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
#align hahn_series.support_eq_empty_iff HahnSeries.support_eq_empty_iff
/-- Change a HahnSeries with coefficients in HahnSeries to a HahnSeries on the Lex product. -/
def ofIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R)) :
HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
coeff := fun g => coeff (coeff x g.1) g.2
isPWO_support' := by
refine Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.subsetProdLex ?_ ?_
· refine Set.IsPWO.mono x.isPWO_support' ?_
simp_rw [Set.image_subset_iff, support_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Function.mem_support]
exact fun _ ↦ ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
· exact fun a => by simpa [Function.mem_support, ne_eq] using (x.coeff a).isPWO_support'
@[simp]
lemma mk_eq_zero (f : Γ → R) (h) : HahnSeries.mk f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [HahnSeries.ext_iff]
rfl
/-- Change a Hahn series on a lex product to a Hahn series with coefficients in a Hahn series. -/
def toIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R) :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) where
coeff := fun g => {
coeff := fun g' => coeff x (g, g')
isPWO_support' := Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g
}
isPWO_support' := by
have h₁ : (Function.support fun g => HahnSeries.mk (fun g' => x.coeff (g, g'))
(Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g)) = Function.support
fun g => fun g' => x.coeff (g, g') := by
simp only [Function.support, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero]
rw [h₁, Function.support_curry' x.coeff]
exact Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.imageProdLex x.isPWO_support'
/-- The equivalence between iterated Hahn series and Hahn series on the lex product. -/
@[simps]
def iterateEquiv {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) ≃ HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
toFun := ofIterate
invFun := toIterate
left_inv := congrFun rfl
right_inv := congrFun rfl
/-- `single a r` is the Hahn series which has coefficient `r` at `a` and zero otherwise. -/
def single (a : Γ) : ZeroHom R (HahnSeries Γ R) where
toFun r :=
{ coeff := Pi.single a r
isPWO_support' := (Set.isPWO_singleton a).mono Pi.support_single_subset }
map_zero' := HahnSeries.ext _ _ (Pi.single_zero _)
#align hahn_series.single HahnSeries.single
variable {a b : Γ} {r : R}
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_same (a : Γ) (r : R) : (single a r).coeff a = r :=
Pi.single_eq_same (f := fun _ => R) a r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_same HahnSeries.single_coeff_same
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_of_ne (h : b ≠ a) : (single a r).coeff b = 0 :=
Pi.single_eq_of_ne (f := fun _ => R) h r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_of_ne HahnSeries.single_coeff_of_ne
theorem single_coeff : (single a r).coeff b = if b = a then r else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align hahn_series.single_coeff HahnSeries.single_coeff
@[simp]
theorem support_single_of_ne (h : r ≠ 0) : support (single a r) = {a} :=
Pi.support_single_of_ne h
#align hahn_series.support_single_of_ne HahnSeries.support_single_of_ne
theorem support_single_subset : support (single a r) ⊆ {a} :=
Pi.support_single_subset
#align hahn_series.support_single_subset HahnSeries.support_single_subset
theorem eq_of_mem_support_single {b : Γ} (h : b ∈ support (single a r)) : b = a :=
support_single_subset h
#align hahn_series.eq_of_mem_support_single HahnSeries.eq_of_mem_support_single
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): simp can prove it
theorem single_eq_zero : single a (0 : R) = 0 :=
(single a).map_zero
#align hahn_series.single_eq_zero HahnSeries.single_eq_zero
theorem single_injective (a : Γ) : Function.Injective (single a : R → HahnSeries Γ R) :=
fun r s rs => by rw [← single_coeff_same a r, ← single_coeff_same a s, rs]
#align hahn_series.single_injective HahnSeries.single_injective
theorem single_ne_zero (h : r ≠ 0) : single a r ≠ 0 := fun con =>
h (single_injective a (con.trans single_eq_zero.symm))
#align hahn_series.single_ne_zero HahnSeries.single_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero_iff {a : Γ} {r : R} : single a r = 0 ↔ r = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff _ <| single_injective a
#align hahn_series.single_eq_zero_iff HahnSeries.single_eq_zero_iff
instance [Nonempty Γ] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨r, s, rs⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
inhabit Γ
refine ⟨single default r, single default s, fun con => rs ?_⟩
rw [← single_coeff_same (default : Γ) r, con, single_coeff_same]⟩
section Order
/-- The orderTop of a Hahn series `x` is a minimal element of `WithTop Γ` where `x` has a nonzero
coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is `⊤` when `x = 0`. -/
def orderTop (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : WithTop Γ :=
if h : x = 0 then ⊤ else x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_zero : orderTop (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem orderTop_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
orderTop x = x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
dif_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero_iff_orderTop {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x ≠ 0 ↔ orderTop x ≠ ⊤ := by
constructor
· exact fun hx => Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun h ↦ h ≠ ⊤) (orderTop_of_ne hx)) WithTop.coe_ne_top
· contrapose!
simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
theorem orderTop_eq_top_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : orderTop x = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 := by
constructor
· contrapose!
exact ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp
· simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
theorem untop_orderTop_of_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
WithTop.untop x.orderTop (ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp hx) =
x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
WithTop.coe_inj.mp ((WithTop.coe_untop (orderTop x) (ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp hx)).trans
(orderTop_of_ne hx))
theorem coeff_orderTop_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (hg : x.orderTop = g) :
x.coeff g ≠ 0 := by
have h : orderTop x ≠ ⊤ := by simp_all only [ne_eq, WithTop.coe_ne_top, not_false_eq_true]
have hx : x ≠ 0 := ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mpr h
rw [orderTop_of_ne hx, WithTop.coe_eq_coe] at hg
rw [← hg]
exact x.isWF_support.min_mem (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx)
theorem orderTop_le_of_coeff_ne_zero {Γ} [LinearOrder Γ] {x : HahnSeries Γ R}
{g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x.orderTop ≤ g := by
rw [orderTop_of_ne (ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero h), WithTop.coe_le_coe]
exact Set.IsWF.min_le _ _ ((mem_support _ _).2 h)
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_single (h : r ≠ 0) : (single a r).orderTop = a :=
(orderTop_of_ne (single_ne_zero h)).trans
(WithTop.coe_inj.mpr (support_single_subset
((single a r).isWF_support.min_mem (support_nonempty_iff.2 (single_ne_zero h)))))
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_orderTop {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {i : Γ} (hi : i < x.orderTop) :
x.coeff i = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· exact zero_coeff
contrapose! hi
rw [← mem_support] at hi
rw [orderTop_of_ne hx, WithTop.coe_lt_coe]
exact Set.IsWF.not_lt_min _ _ hi
variable [Zero Γ]
/-- The order of a nonzero Hahn series `x` is a minimal element of `Γ` where `x` has a
nonzero coefficient, the order of 0 is 0. -/
def order (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Γ :=
if h : x = 0 then 0 else x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 h)
#align hahn_series.order HahnSeries.order
@[simp]
theorem order_zero : order (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align hahn_series.order_zero HahnSeries.order_zero
theorem order_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
order x = x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
dif_neg hx
#align hahn_series.order_of_ne HahnSeries.order_of_ne
theorem order_eq_orderTop_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) : order x = orderTop x := by
rw [order_of_ne hx, orderTop_of_ne hx]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/Basic.lean | 313 | 315 | theorem coeff_order_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x.coeff x.order ≠ 0 := by |
rw [order_of_ne hx]
exact x.isWF_support.min_mem (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
/-!
# Row and column matrices
This file provides results about row and column matrices
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.row r : Matrix Unit n α`: a matrix with a single row
* `Matrix.col c : Matrix m Unit α`: a matrix with a single column
* `Matrix.updateRow M i r`: update the `i`th row of `M` to `r`
* `Matrix.updateCol M j c`: update the `j`th column of `M` to `c`
-/
variable {l m n o : Type*}
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w}
namespace Matrix
/-- `Matrix.col u` is the column matrix whose entries are given by `u`. -/
def col (w : m → α) : Matrix m Unit α :=
of fun x _ => w x
#align matrix.col Matrix.col
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `col`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem col_apply (w : m → α) (i j) : col w i j = w i :=
rfl
#align matrix.col_apply Matrix.col_apply
/-- `Matrix.row u` is the row matrix whose entries are given by `u`. -/
def row (v : n → α) : Matrix Unit n α :=
of fun _ y => v y
#align matrix.row Matrix.row
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `row`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem row_apply (v : n → α) (i j) : row v i j = v j :=
rfl
#align matrix.row_apply Matrix.row_apply
theorem col_injective : Function.Injective (col : (m → α) → _) :=
fun _x _y h => funext fun i => congr_fun₂ h i ()
@[simp] theorem col_inj {v w : m → α} : col v = col w ↔ v = w := col_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem col_zero [Zero α] : col (0 : m → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem col_eq_zero [Zero α] (v : m → α) : col v = 0 ↔ v = 0 := col_inj
@[simp]
theorem col_add [Add α] (v w : m → α) : col (v + w) = col v + col w := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_add Matrix.col_add
@[simp]
theorem col_smul [SMul R α] (x : R) (v : m → α) : col (x • v) = x • col v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_smul Matrix.col_smul
theorem row_injective : Function.Injective (row : (n → α) → _) :=
fun _x _y h => funext fun j => congr_fun₂ h () j
@[simp] theorem row_inj {v w : n → α} : row v = row w ↔ v = w := row_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem row_zero [Zero α] : row (0 : n → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem row_eq_zero [Zero α] (v : n → α) : row v = 0 ↔ v = 0 := row_inj
@[simp]
theorem row_add [Add α] (v w : m → α) : row (v + w) = row v + row w := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.row_add Matrix.row_add
@[simp]
theorem row_smul [SMul R α] (x : R) (v : m → α) : row (x • v) = x • row v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.row_smul Matrix.row_smul
@[simp]
theorem transpose_col (v : m → α) : (Matrix.col v)ᵀ = Matrix.row v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.transpose_col Matrix.transpose_col
@[simp]
theorem transpose_row (v : m → α) : (Matrix.row v)ᵀ = Matrix.col v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.transpose_row Matrix.transpose_row
@[simp]
theorem conjTranspose_col [Star α] (v : m → α) : (col v)ᴴ = row (star v) := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.conj_transpose_col Matrix.conjTranspose_col
@[simp]
theorem conjTranspose_row [Star α] (v : m → α) : (row v)ᴴ = col (star v) := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.conj_transpose_row Matrix.conjTranspose_row
theorem row_vecMul [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix m n α) (v : m → α) :
Matrix.row (v ᵥ* M) = Matrix.row v * M := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.row_vec_mul Matrix.row_vecMul
theorem col_vecMul [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix m n α) (v : m → α) :
Matrix.col (v ᵥ* M) = (Matrix.row v * M)ᵀ := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_vec_mul Matrix.col_vecMul
theorem col_mulVec [Fintype n] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix m n α) (v : n → α) :
Matrix.col (M *ᵥ v) = M * Matrix.col v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_mul_vec Matrix.col_mulVec
theorem row_mulVec [Fintype n] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix m n α) (v : n → α) :
Matrix.row (M *ᵥ v) = (M * Matrix.col v)ᵀ := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.row_mul_vec Matrix.row_mulVec
@[simp]
theorem row_mul_col_apply [Fintype m] [Mul α] [AddCommMonoid α] (v w : m → α) (i j) :
(row v * col w) i j = v ⬝ᵥ w :=
rfl
#align matrix.row_mul_col_apply Matrix.row_mul_col_apply
@[simp]
theorem diag_col_mul_row [Mul α] [AddCommMonoid α] (a b : n → α) :
diag (col a * row b) = a * b := by
ext
simp [Matrix.mul_apply, col, row]
#align matrix.diag_col_mul_row Matrix.diag_col_mul_row
theorem vecMulVec_eq [Mul α] [AddCommMonoid α] (w : m → α) (v : n → α) :
vecMulVec w v = col w * row v := by
ext
simp only [vecMulVec, mul_apply, Fintype.univ_punit, Finset.sum_singleton]
rfl
#align matrix.vec_mul_vec_eq Matrix.vecMulVec_eq
/-! ### Updating rows and columns -/
/-- Update, i.e. replace the `i`th row of matrix `A` with the values in `b`. -/
def updateRow [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m n α) (i : m) (b : n → α) : Matrix m n α :=
of <| Function.update M i b
#align matrix.update_row Matrix.updateRow
/-- Update, i.e. replace the `j`th column of matrix `A` with the values in `b`. -/
def updateColumn [DecidableEq n] (M : Matrix m n α) (j : n) (b : m → α) : Matrix m n α :=
of fun i => Function.update (M i) j (b i)
#align matrix.update_column Matrix.updateColumn
variable {M : Matrix m n α} {i : m} {j : n} {b : n → α} {c : m → α}
@[simp]
theorem updateRow_self [DecidableEq m] : updateRow M i b i = b :=
-- Porting note: (implicit arg) added `(β := _)`
Function.update_same (β := fun _ => (n → α)) i b M
#align matrix.update_row_self Matrix.updateRow_self
@[simp]
theorem updateColumn_self [DecidableEq n] : updateColumn M j c i j = c i :=
-- Porting note: (implicit arg) added `(β := _)`
Function.update_same (β := fun _ => α) j (c i) (M i)
#align matrix.update_column_self Matrix.updateColumn_self
@[simp]
theorem updateRow_ne [DecidableEq m] {i' : m} (i_ne : i' ≠ i) : updateRow M i b i' = M i' :=
-- Porting note: (implicit arg) added `(β := _)`
Function.update_noteq (β := fun _ => (n → α)) i_ne b M
#align matrix.update_row_ne Matrix.updateRow_ne
@[simp]
theorem updateColumn_ne [DecidableEq n] {j' : n} (j_ne : j' ≠ j) :
updateColumn M j c i j' = M i j' :=
-- Porting note: (implicit arg) added `(β := _)`
Function.update_noteq (β := fun _ => α) j_ne (c i) (M i)
#align matrix.update_column_ne Matrix.updateColumn_ne
theorem updateRow_apply [DecidableEq m] {i' : m} :
updateRow M i b i' j = if i' = i then b j else M i' j := by
by_cases h : i' = i
· rw [h, updateRow_self, if_pos rfl]
· rw [updateRow_ne h, if_neg h]
#align matrix.update_row_apply Matrix.updateRow_apply
theorem updateColumn_apply [DecidableEq n] {j' : n} :
updateColumn M j c i j' = if j' = j then c i else M i j' := by
by_cases h : j' = j
· rw [h, updateColumn_self, if_pos rfl]
· rw [updateColumn_ne h, if_neg h]
#align matrix.update_column_apply Matrix.updateColumn_apply
@[simp]
theorem updateColumn_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix m n R) (i : n) (b : m → R) :
A.updateColumn i b = (col b).submatrix id (Function.const n ()) := by
ext x y
simp [updateColumn_apply, Subsingleton.elim i y]
#align matrix.update_column_subsingleton Matrix.updateColumn_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem updateRow_subsingleton [Subsingleton m] (A : Matrix m n R) (i : m) (b : n → R) :
A.updateRow i b = (row b).submatrix (Function.const m ()) id := by
ext x y
simp [updateColumn_apply, Subsingleton.elim i x]
#align matrix.update_row_subsingleton Matrix.updateRow_subsingleton
theorem map_updateRow [DecidableEq m] (f : α → β) :
map (updateRow M i b) f = updateRow (M.map f) i (f ∘ b) := by
ext
rw [updateRow_apply, map_apply, map_apply, updateRow_apply]
exact apply_ite f _ _ _
#align matrix.map_update_row Matrix.map_updateRow
theorem map_updateColumn [DecidableEq n] (f : α → β) :
map (updateColumn M j c) f = updateColumn (M.map f) j (f ∘ c) := by
ext
rw [updateColumn_apply, map_apply, map_apply, updateColumn_apply]
exact apply_ite f _ _ _
#align matrix.map_update_column Matrix.map_updateColumn
theorem updateRow_transpose [DecidableEq n] : updateRow Mᵀ j c = (updateColumn M j c)ᵀ := by
ext
rw [transpose_apply, updateRow_apply, updateColumn_apply]
rfl
#align matrix.update_row_transpose Matrix.updateRow_transpose
theorem updateColumn_transpose [DecidableEq m] : updateColumn Mᵀ i b = (updateRow M i b)ᵀ := by
ext
rw [transpose_apply, updateRow_apply, updateColumn_apply]
rfl
#align matrix.update_column_transpose Matrix.updateColumn_transpose
theorem updateRow_conjTranspose [DecidableEq n] [Star α] :
updateRow Mᴴ j (star c) = (updateColumn M j c)ᴴ := by
rw [conjTranspose, conjTranspose, transpose_map, transpose_map, updateRow_transpose,
map_updateColumn]
rfl
#align matrix.update_row_conj_transpose Matrix.updateRow_conjTranspose
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/RowCol.lean | 261 | 265 | theorem updateColumn_conjTranspose [DecidableEq m] [Star α] :
updateColumn Mᴴ i (star b) = (updateRow M i b)ᴴ := by |
rw [conjTranspose, conjTranspose, transpose_map, transpose_map, updateColumn_transpose,
map_updateRow]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import computability.turing_machine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
/-!
# Turing machines
This file defines a sequence of simple machine languages, starting with Turing machines and working
up to more complex languages based on Wang B-machines.
## Naming conventions
Each model of computation in this file shares a naming convention for the elements of a model of
computation. These are the parameters for the language:
* `Γ` is the alphabet on the tape.
* `Λ` is the set of labels, or internal machine states.
* `σ` is the type of internal memory, not on the tape. This does not exist in the TM0 model, and
later models achieve this by mixing it into `Λ`.
* `K` is used in the TM2 model, which has multiple stacks, and denotes the number of such stacks.
All of these variables denote "essentially finite" types, but for technical reasons it is
convenient to allow them to be infinite anyway. When using an infinite type, we will be interested
to prove that only finitely many values of the type are ever interacted with.
Given these parameters, there are a few common structures for the model that arise:
* `Stmt` is the set of all actions that can be performed in one step. For the TM0 model this set is
finite, and for later models it is an infinite inductive type representing "possible program
texts".
* `Cfg` is the set of instantaneous configurations, that is, the state of the machine together with
its environment.
* `Machine` is the set of all machines in the model. Usually this is approximately a function
`Λ → Stmt`, although different models have different ways of halting and other actions.
* `step : Cfg → Option Cfg` is the function that describes how the state evolves over one step.
If `step c = none`, then `c` is a terminal state, and the result of the computation is read off
from `c`. Because of the type of `step`, these models are all deterministic by construction.
* `init : Input → Cfg` sets up the initial state. The type `Input` depends on the model;
in most cases it is `List Γ`.
* `eval : Machine → Input → Part Output`, given a machine `M` and input `i`, starts from
`init i`, runs `step` until it reaches an output, and then applies a function `Cfg → Output` to
the final state to obtain the result. The type `Output` depends on the model.
* `Supports : Machine → Finset Λ → Prop` asserts that a machine `M` starts in `S : Finset Λ`, and
can only ever jump to other states inside `S`. This implies that the behavior of `M` on any input
cannot depend on its values outside `S`. We use this to allow `Λ` to be an infinite set when
convenient, and prove that only finitely many of these states are actually accessible. This
formalizes "essentially finite" mentioned above.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Relation
open Nat (iterate)
open Function (update iterate_succ iterate_succ_apply iterate_succ' iterate_succ_apply'
iterate_zero_apply)
namespace Turing
/-- The `BlankExtends` partial order holds of `l₁` and `l₂` if `l₂` is obtained by adding
blanks (`default : Γ`) to the end of `l₁`. -/
def BlankExtends {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) : Prop :=
∃ n, l₂ = l₁ ++ List.replicate n default
#align turing.blank_extends Turing.BlankExtends
@[refl]
theorem BlankExtends.refl {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) : BlankExtends l l :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
#align turing.blank_extends.refl Turing.BlankExtends.refl
@[trans]
theorem BlankExtends.trans {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List Γ} :
BlankExtends l₁ l₂ → BlankExtends l₂ l₃ → BlankExtends l₁ l₃ := by
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i + j, by simp [List.replicate_add]⟩
#align turing.blank_extends.trans Turing.BlankExtends.trans
theorem BlankExtends.below_of_le {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : List Γ} :
BlankExtends l l₁ → BlankExtends l l₂ → l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → BlankExtends l₁ l₂ := by
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, rfl⟩ h; use j - i
simp only [List.length_append, Nat.add_le_add_iff_left, List.length_replicate] at h
simp only [← List.replicate_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel' h, List.append_assoc]
#align turing.blank_extends.below_of_le Turing.BlankExtends.below_of_le
/-- Any two extensions by blank `l₁,l₂` of `l` have a common join (which can be taken to be the
longer of `l₁` and `l₂`). -/
def BlankExtends.above {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : List Γ} (h₁ : BlankExtends l l₁)
(h₂ : BlankExtends l l₂) : { l' // BlankExtends l₁ l' ∧ BlankExtends l₂ l' } :=
if h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length then ⟨l₂, h₁.below_of_le h₂ h, BlankExtends.refl _⟩
else ⟨l₁, BlankExtends.refl _, h₂.below_of_le h₁ (le_of_not_ge h)⟩
#align turing.blank_extends.above Turing.BlankExtends.above
theorem BlankExtends.above_of_le {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : List Γ} :
BlankExtends l₁ l → BlankExtends l₂ l → l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → BlankExtends l₁ l₂ := by
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, e⟩ h; use i - j
refine List.append_cancel_right (e.symm.trans ?_)
rw [List.append_assoc, ← List.replicate_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
apply_fun List.length at e
simp only [List.length_append, List.length_replicate] at e
rwa [← Nat.add_le_add_iff_left, e, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
#align turing.blank_extends.above_of_le Turing.BlankExtends.above_of_le
/-- `BlankRel` is the symmetric closure of `BlankExtends`, turning it into an equivalence
relation. Two lists are related by `BlankRel` if one extends the other by blanks. -/
def BlankRel {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) : Prop :=
BlankExtends l₁ l₂ ∨ BlankExtends l₂ l₁
#align turing.blank_rel Turing.BlankRel
@[refl]
theorem BlankRel.refl {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) : BlankRel l l :=
Or.inl (BlankExtends.refl _)
#align turing.blank_rel.refl Turing.BlankRel.refl
@[symm]
theorem BlankRel.symm {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : List Γ} : BlankRel l₁ l₂ → BlankRel l₂ l₁ :=
Or.symm
#align turing.blank_rel.symm Turing.BlankRel.symm
@[trans]
theorem BlankRel.trans {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List Γ} :
BlankRel l₁ l₂ → BlankRel l₂ l₃ → BlankRel l₁ l₃ := by
rintro (h₁ | h₁) (h₂ | h₂)
· exact Or.inl (h₁.trans h₂)
· rcases le_total l₁.length l₃.length with h | h
· exact Or.inl (h₁.above_of_le h₂ h)
· exact Or.inr (h₂.above_of_le h₁ h)
· rcases le_total l₁.length l₃.length with h | h
· exact Or.inl (h₁.below_of_le h₂ h)
· exact Or.inr (h₂.below_of_le h₁ h)
· exact Or.inr (h₂.trans h₁)
#align turing.blank_rel.trans Turing.BlankRel.trans
/-- Given two `BlankRel` lists, there exists (constructively) a common join. -/
def BlankRel.above {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : List Γ} (h : BlankRel l₁ l₂) :
{ l // BlankExtends l₁ l ∧ BlankExtends l₂ l } := by
refine
if hl : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length then ⟨l₂, Or.elim h id fun h' ↦ ?_, BlankExtends.refl _⟩
else ⟨l₁, BlankExtends.refl _, Or.elim h (fun h' ↦ ?_) id⟩
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' hl
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' (le_of_not_ge hl)
#align turing.blank_rel.above Turing.BlankRel.above
/-- Given two `BlankRel` lists, there exists (constructively) a common meet. -/
def BlankRel.below {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : List Γ} (h : BlankRel l₁ l₂) :
{ l // BlankExtends l l₁ ∧ BlankExtends l l₂ } := by
refine
if hl : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length then ⟨l₁, BlankExtends.refl _, Or.elim h id fun h' ↦ ?_⟩
else ⟨l₂, Or.elim h (fun h' ↦ ?_) id, BlankExtends.refl _⟩
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' hl
· exact (BlankExtends.refl _).above_of_le h' (le_of_not_ge hl)
#align turing.blank_rel.below Turing.BlankRel.below
theorem BlankRel.equivalence (Γ) [Inhabited Γ] : Equivalence (@BlankRel Γ _) :=
⟨BlankRel.refl, @BlankRel.symm _ _, @BlankRel.trans _ _⟩
#align turing.blank_rel.equivalence Turing.BlankRel.equivalence
/-- Construct a setoid instance for `BlankRel`. -/
def BlankRel.setoid (Γ) [Inhabited Γ] : Setoid (List Γ) :=
⟨_, BlankRel.equivalence _⟩
#align turing.blank_rel.setoid Turing.BlankRel.setoid
/-- A `ListBlank Γ` is a quotient of `List Γ` by extension by blanks at the end. This is used to
represent half-tapes of a Turing machine, so that we can pretend that the list continues
infinitely with blanks. -/
def ListBlank (Γ) [Inhabited Γ] :=
Quotient (BlankRel.setoid Γ)
#align turing.list_blank Turing.ListBlank
instance ListBlank.inhabited {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : Inhabited (ListBlank Γ) :=
⟨Quotient.mk'' []⟩
#align turing.list_blank.inhabited Turing.ListBlank.inhabited
instance ListBlank.hasEmptyc {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : EmptyCollection (ListBlank Γ) :=
⟨Quotient.mk'' []⟩
#align turing.list_blank.has_emptyc Turing.ListBlank.hasEmptyc
/-- A modified version of `Quotient.liftOn'` specialized for `ListBlank`, with the stronger
precondition `BlankExtends` instead of `BlankRel`. -/
-- Porting note: Removed `@[elab_as_elim]`
protected abbrev ListBlank.liftOn {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {α} (l : ListBlank Γ) (f : List Γ → α)
(H : ∀ a b, BlankExtends a b → f a = f b) : α :=
l.liftOn' f <| by rintro a b (h | h) <;> [exact H _ _ h; exact (H _ _ h).symm]
#align turing.list_blank.lift_on Turing.ListBlank.liftOn
/-- The quotient map turning a `List` into a `ListBlank`. -/
def ListBlank.mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : List Γ → ListBlank Γ :=
Quotient.mk''
#align turing.list_blank.mk Turing.ListBlank.mk
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ListBlank.induction_on {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] {p : ListBlank Γ → Prop}
(q : ListBlank Γ) (h : ∀ a, p (ListBlank.mk a)) : p q :=
Quotient.inductionOn' q h
#align turing.list_blank.induction_on Turing.ListBlank.induction_on
/-- The head of a `ListBlank` is well defined. -/
def ListBlank.head {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) : Γ := by
apply l.liftOn List.headI
rintro a _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
cases a
· cases i <;> rfl
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head Turing.ListBlank.head
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.head_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) :
ListBlank.head (ListBlank.mk l) = l.headI :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head_mk Turing.ListBlank.head_mk
/-- The tail of a `ListBlank` is well defined (up to the tail of blanks). -/
def ListBlank.tail {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) : ListBlank Γ := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk l.tail)
rintro a _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ?_)
cases a
· cases' i with i <;> [exact ⟨0, rfl⟩; exact ⟨i, rfl⟩]
exact ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align turing.list_blank.tail Turing.ListBlank.tail
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.tail_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) :
ListBlank.tail (ListBlank.mk l) = ListBlank.mk l.tail :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.tail_mk Turing.ListBlank.tail_mk
/-- We can cons an element onto a `ListBlank`. -/
def ListBlank.cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) (l : ListBlank Γ) : ListBlank Γ := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk (List.cons a l))
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨i, rfl⟩)
#align turing.list_blank.cons Turing.ListBlank.cons
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.cons_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) (l : List Γ) :
ListBlank.cons a (ListBlank.mk l) = ListBlank.mk (a :: l) :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.cons_mk Turing.ListBlank.cons_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.head_cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) : ∀ l : ListBlank Γ, (l.cons a).head = a :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head_cons Turing.ListBlank.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.tail_cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) : ∀ l : ListBlank Γ, (l.cons a).tail = l :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.tail_cons Turing.ListBlank.tail_cons
/-- The `cons` and `head`/`tail` functions are mutually inverse, unlike in the case of `List` where
this only holds for nonempty lists. -/
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.cons_head_tail {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : ∀ l : ListBlank Γ, l.tail.cons l.head = l := by
apply Quotient.ind'
refine fun l ↦ Quotient.sound' (Or.inr ?_)
cases l
· exact ⟨1, rfl⟩
· rfl
#align turing.list_blank.cons_head_tail Turing.ListBlank.cons_head_tail
/-- The `cons` and `head`/`tail` functions are mutually inverse, unlike in the case of `List` where
this only holds for nonempty lists. -/
theorem ListBlank.exists_cons {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) :
∃ a l', l = ListBlank.cons a l' :=
⟨_, _, (ListBlank.cons_head_tail _).symm⟩
#align turing.list_blank.exists_cons Turing.ListBlank.exists_cons
/-- The n-th element of a `ListBlank` is well defined for all `n : ℕ`, unlike in a `List`. -/
def ListBlank.nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) : Γ := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ List.getI l n)
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
cases' lt_or_le n _ with h h
· rw [List.getI_append _ _ _ h]
rw [List.getI_eq_default _ h]
rcases le_or_lt _ n with h₂ | h₂
· rw [List.getI_eq_default _ h₂]
rw [List.getI_eq_get _ h₂, List.get_append_right' h, List.get_replicate]
#align turing.list_blank.nth Turing.ListBlank.nth
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) (n : ℕ) :
(ListBlank.mk l).nth n = l.getI n :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_mk Turing.ListBlank.nth_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_zero {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) : l.nth 0 = l.head := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l.tail fun l ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_zero Turing.ListBlank.nth_zero
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_succ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
l.nth (n + 1) = l.tail.nth n := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l.tail fun l ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_succ Turing.ListBlank.nth_succ
@[ext]
theorem ListBlank.ext {Γ} [i : Inhabited Γ] {L₁ L₂ : ListBlank Γ} :
(∀ i, L₁.nth i = L₂.nth i) → L₁ = L₂ := by
refine ListBlank.induction_on L₁ fun l₁ ↦ ListBlank.induction_on L₂ fun l₂ H ↦ ?_
wlog h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length
· cases le_total l₁.length l₂.length <;> [skip; symm] <;> apply this <;> try assumption
intro
rw [H]
refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨l₂.length - l₁.length, ?_⟩)
refine List.ext_get ?_ fun i h h₂ ↦ Eq.symm ?_
· simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel' h, List.length_append, List.length_replicate]
simp only [ListBlank.nth_mk] at H
cases' lt_or_le i l₁.length with h' h'
· simp only [List.get_append _ h', List.get?_eq_get h, List.get?_eq_get h',
← List.getI_eq_get _ h, ← List.getI_eq_get _ h', H]
· simp only [List.get_append_right' h', List.get_replicate, List.get?_eq_get h,
List.get?_len_le h', ← List.getI_eq_default _ h', H, List.getI_eq_get _ h]
#align turing.list_blank.ext Turing.ListBlank.ext
/-- Apply a function to a value stored at the nth position of the list. -/
@[simp]
def ListBlank.modifyNth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) : ℕ → ListBlank Γ → ListBlank Γ
| 0, L => L.tail.cons (f L.head)
| n + 1, L => (L.tail.modifyNth f n).cons L.head
#align turing.list_blank.modify_nth Turing.ListBlank.modifyNth
theorem ListBlank.nth_modifyNth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) (n i) (L : ListBlank Γ) :
(L.modifyNth f n).nth i = if i = n then f (L.nth i) else L.nth i := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing i L
· cases i <;> simp only [ListBlank.nth_zero, if_true, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth,
ListBlank.nth_succ, if_false, ListBlank.tail_cons, Nat.zero_eq]
· cases i
· rw [if_neg (Nat.succ_ne_zero _).symm]
simp only [ListBlank.nth_zero, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth, Nat.zero_eq]
· simp only [IH, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.tail_cons, Nat.succ.injEq]
#align turing.list_blank.nth_modify_nth Turing.ListBlank.nth_modifyNth
/-- A pointed map of `Inhabited` types is a map that sends one default value to the other. -/
structure PointedMap.{u, v} (Γ : Type u) (Γ' : Type v) [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] :
Type max u v where
/-- The map underlying this instance. -/
f : Γ → Γ'
map_pt' : f default = default
#align turing.pointed_map Turing.PointedMap
instance {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] : Inhabited (PointedMap Γ Γ') :=
⟨⟨default, rfl⟩⟩
instance {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] : CoeFun (PointedMap Γ Γ') fun _ ↦ Γ → Γ' :=
⟨PointedMap.f⟩
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem PointedMap.mk_val {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : Γ → Γ') (pt) :
(PointedMap.mk f pt : Γ → Γ') = f :=
rfl
#align turing.pointed_map.mk_val Turing.PointedMap.mk_val
@[simp]
theorem PointedMap.map_pt {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') :
f default = default :=
PointedMap.map_pt' _
#align turing.pointed_map.map_pt Turing.PointedMap.map_pt
@[simp]
theorem PointedMap.headI_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : List Γ) : (l.map f).headI = f l.headI := by
cases l <;> [exact (PointedMap.map_pt f).symm; rfl]
#align turing.pointed_map.head_map Turing.PointedMap.headI_map
/-- The `map` function on lists is well defined on `ListBlank`s provided that the map is
pointed. -/
def ListBlank.map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (l : ListBlank Γ) :
ListBlank Γ' := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk (List.map f l))
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨i, ?_⟩)
simp only [PointedMap.map_pt, List.map_append, List.map_replicate]
#align turing.list_blank.map Turing.ListBlank.map
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.map_mk {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (l : List Γ) :
(ListBlank.mk l).map f = ListBlank.mk (l.map f) :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.map_mk Turing.ListBlank.map_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.head_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) : (l.map f).head = f l.head := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l fun a ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.head_map Turing.ListBlank.head_map
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.tail_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) : (l.map f).tail = l.tail.map f := by
conv => lhs; rw [← ListBlank.cons_head_tail l]
exact Quotient.inductionOn' l fun a ↦ rfl
#align turing.list_blank.tail_map Turing.ListBlank.tail_map
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.map_cons {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) (a : Γ) : (l.cons a).map f = (l.map f).cons (f a) := by
refine (ListBlank.cons_head_tail _).symm.trans ?_
simp only [ListBlank.head_map, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_map, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.list_blank.map_cons Turing.ListBlank.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.nth_map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(l : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) : (l.map f).nth n = f (l.nth n) := by
refine l.inductionOn fun l ↦ ?_
-- Porting note: Added `suffices` to get `simp` to work.
suffices ((mk l).map f).nth n = f ((mk l).nth n) by exact this
simp only [List.get?_map, ListBlank.map_mk, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_get?]
cases l.get? n
· exact f.2.symm
· rfl
#align turing.list_blank.nth_map Turing.ListBlank.nth_map
/-- The `i`-th projection as a pointed map. -/
def proj {ι : Type*} {Γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Inhabited (Γ i)] (i : ι) :
PointedMap (∀ i, Γ i) (Γ i) :=
⟨fun a ↦ a i, rfl⟩
#align turing.proj Turing.proj
theorem proj_map_nth {ι : Type*} {Γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Inhabited (Γ i)] (i : ι) (L n) :
(ListBlank.map (@proj ι Γ _ i) L).nth n = L.nth n i := by
rw [ListBlank.nth_map]; rfl
#align turing.proj_map_nth Turing.proj_map_nth
theorem ListBlank.map_modifyNth {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (F : PointedMap Γ Γ')
(f : Γ → Γ) (f' : Γ' → Γ') (H : ∀ x, F (f x) = f' (F x)) (n) (L : ListBlank Γ) :
(L.modifyNth f n).map F = (L.map F).modifyNth f' n := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing L <;>
simp only [*, ListBlank.head_map, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.map_cons, ListBlank.tail_map]
#align turing.list_blank.map_modify_nth Turing.ListBlank.map_modifyNth
/-- Append a list on the left side of a `ListBlank`. -/
@[simp]
def ListBlank.append {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : List Γ → ListBlank Γ → ListBlank Γ
| [], L => L
| a :: l, L => ListBlank.cons a (ListBlank.append l L)
#align turing.list_blank.append Turing.ListBlank.append
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.append_mk {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) :
ListBlank.append l₁ (ListBlank.mk l₂) = ListBlank.mk (l₁ ++ l₂) := by
induction l₁ <;>
simp only [*, ListBlank.append, List.nil_append, List.cons_append, ListBlank.cons_mk]
#align turing.list_blank.append_mk Turing.ListBlank.append_mk
theorem ListBlank.append_assoc {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : List Γ) (l₃ : ListBlank Γ) :
ListBlank.append (l₁ ++ l₂) l₃ = ListBlank.append l₁ (ListBlank.append l₂ l₃) := by
refine l₃.inductionOn fun l ↦ ?_
-- Porting note: Added `suffices` to get `simp` to work.
suffices append (l₁ ++ l₂) (mk l) = append l₁ (append l₂ (mk l)) by exact this
simp only [ListBlank.append_mk, List.append_assoc]
#align turing.list_blank.append_assoc Turing.ListBlank.append_assoc
/-- The `bind` function on lists is well defined on `ListBlank`s provided that the default element
is sent to a sequence of default elements. -/
def ListBlank.bind {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (l : ListBlank Γ) (f : Γ → List Γ')
(hf : ∃ n, f default = List.replicate n default) : ListBlank Γ' := by
apply l.liftOn (fun l ↦ ListBlank.mk (List.bind l f))
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; cases' hf with n e; refine Quotient.sound' (Or.inl ⟨i * n, ?_⟩)
rw [List.append_bind, mul_comm]; congr
induction' i with i IH
· rfl
simp only [IH, e, List.replicate_add, Nat.mul_succ, add_comm, List.replicate_succ, List.cons_bind]
#align turing.list_blank.bind Turing.ListBlank.bind
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.bind_mk {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (l : List Γ) (f : Γ → List Γ') (hf) :
(ListBlank.mk l).bind f hf = ListBlank.mk (l.bind f) :=
rfl
#align turing.list_blank.bind_mk Turing.ListBlank.bind_mk
@[simp]
theorem ListBlank.cons_bind {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (a : Γ) (l : ListBlank Γ)
(f : Γ → List Γ') (hf) : (l.cons a).bind f hf = (l.bind f hf).append (f a) := by
refine l.inductionOn fun l ↦ ?_
-- Porting note: Added `suffices` to get `simp` to work.
suffices ((mk l).cons a).bind f hf = ((mk l).bind f hf).append (f a) by exact this
simp only [ListBlank.append_mk, ListBlank.bind_mk, ListBlank.cons_mk, List.cons_bind]
#align turing.list_blank.cons_bind Turing.ListBlank.cons_bind
/-- The tape of a Turing machine is composed of a head element (which we imagine to be the
current position of the head), together with two `ListBlank`s denoting the portions of the tape
going off to the left and right. When the Turing machine moves right, an element is pulled from the
right side and becomes the new head, while the head element is `cons`ed onto the left side. -/
structure Tape (Γ : Type*) [Inhabited Γ] where
/-- The current position of the head. -/
head : Γ
/-- The portion of the tape going off to the left. -/
left : ListBlank Γ
/-- The portion of the tape going off to the right. -/
right : ListBlank Γ
#align turing.tape Turing.Tape
instance Tape.inhabited {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : Inhabited (Tape Γ) :=
⟨by constructor <;> apply default⟩
#align turing.tape.inhabited Turing.Tape.inhabited
/-- A direction for the Turing machine `move` command, either
left or right. -/
inductive Dir
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align turing.dir Turing.Dir
/-- The "inclusive" left side of the tape, including both `left` and `head`. -/
def Tape.left₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ListBlank Γ :=
T.left.cons T.head
#align turing.tape.left₀ Turing.Tape.left₀
/-- The "inclusive" right side of the tape, including both `right` and `head`. -/
def Tape.right₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ListBlank Γ :=
T.right.cons T.head
#align turing.tape.right₀ Turing.Tape.right₀
/-- Move the tape in response to a motion of the Turing machine. Note that `T.move Dir.left` makes
`T.left` smaller; the Turing machine is moving left and the tape is moving right. -/
def Tape.move {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : Dir → Tape Γ → Tape Γ
| Dir.left, ⟨a, L, R⟩ => ⟨L.head, L.tail, R.cons a⟩
| Dir.right, ⟨a, L, R⟩ => ⟨R.head, L.cons a, R.tail⟩
#align turing.tape.move Turing.Tape.move
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_left_right {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) :
(T.move Dir.left).move Dir.right = T := by
cases T; simp [Tape.move]
#align turing.tape.move_left_right Turing.Tape.move_left_right
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_left {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) :
(T.move Dir.right).move Dir.left = T := by
cases T; simp [Tape.move]
#align turing.tape.move_right_left Turing.Tape.move_right_left
/-- Construct a tape from a left side and an inclusive right side. -/
def Tape.mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : Tape Γ :=
⟨R.head, L, R.tail⟩
#align turing.tape.mk' Turing.Tape.mk'
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_left {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).left = L :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.mk'_left Turing.Tape.mk'_left
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_head {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).head = R.head :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.mk'_head Turing.Tape.mk'_head
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_right {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).right = R.tail :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.mk'_right Turing.Tape.mk'_right
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_right₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) : (Tape.mk' L R).right₀ = R :=
ListBlank.cons_head_tail _
#align turing.tape.mk'_right₀ Turing.Tape.mk'_right₀
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_left_right₀ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : Tape.mk' T.left T.right₀ = T := by
cases T
simp only [Tape.right₀, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_cons, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self_iff]
#align turing.tape.mk'_left_right₀ Turing.Tape.mk'_left_right₀
theorem Tape.exists_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ∃ L R, T = Tape.mk' L R :=
⟨_, _, (Tape.mk'_left_right₀ _).symm⟩
#align turing.tape.exists_mk' Turing.Tape.exists_mk'
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_left_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).move Dir.left = Tape.mk' L.tail (R.cons L.head) := by
simp only [Tape.move, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, eq_self_iff_true, ListBlank.cons_head_tail,
and_self_iff, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.tape.move_left_mk' Turing.Tape.move_left_mk'
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).move Dir.right = Tape.mk' (L.cons R.head) R.tail := by
simp only [Tape.move, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, eq_self_iff_true, ListBlank.cons_head_tail,
and_self_iff, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.tape.move_right_mk' Turing.Tape.move_right_mk'
/-- Construct a tape from a left side and an inclusive right side. -/
def Tape.mk₂ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : List Γ) : Tape Γ :=
Tape.mk' (ListBlank.mk L) (ListBlank.mk R)
#align turing.tape.mk₂ Turing.Tape.mk₂
/-- Construct a tape from a list, with the head of the list at the TM head and the rest going
to the right. -/
def Tape.mk₁ {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (l : List Γ) : Tape Γ :=
Tape.mk₂ [] l
#align turing.tape.mk₁ Turing.Tape.mk₁
/-- The `nth` function of a tape is integer-valued, with index `0` being the head, negative indexes
on the left and positive indexes on the right. (Picture a number line.) -/
def Tape.nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : ℤ → Γ
| 0 => T.head
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => T.right.nth n
| -(n + 1 : ℕ) => T.left.nth n
#align turing.tape.nth Turing.Tape.nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.nth_zero {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) : T.nth 0 = T.1 :=
rfl
#align turing.tape.nth_zero Turing.Tape.nth_zero
theorem Tape.right₀_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) (n : ℕ) : T.right₀.nth n = T.nth n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Tape.nth, Tape.right₀, Int.ofNat_zero, ListBlank.nth_zero,
ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_cons, Nat.zero_eq]
#align turing.tape.right₀_nth Turing.Tape.right₀_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.mk'_nth_nat {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (L R : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).nth n = R.nth n := by
rw [← Tape.right₀_nth, Tape.mk'_right₀]
#align turing.tape.mk'_nth_nat Turing.Tape.mk'_nth_nat
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_left_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] :
∀ (T : Tape Γ) (i : ℤ), (T.move Dir.left).nth i = T.nth (i - 1)
| ⟨_, L, _⟩, -(n + 1 : ℕ) => (ListBlank.nth_succ _ _).symm
| ⟨_, L, _⟩, 0 => (ListBlank.nth_zero _).symm
| ⟨a, L, R⟩, 1 => (ListBlank.nth_zero _).trans (ListBlank.head_cons _ _)
| ⟨a, L, R⟩, (n + 1 : ℕ) + 1 => by
rw [add_sub_cancel_right]
change (R.cons a).nth (n + 1) = R.nth n
rw [ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.tail_cons]
#align turing.tape.move_left_nth Turing.Tape.move_left_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) (i : ℤ) :
(T.move Dir.right).nth i = T.nth (i + 1) := by
conv => rhs; rw [← T.move_right_left]
rw [Tape.move_left_nth, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align turing.tape.move_right_nth Turing.Tape.move_right_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.move_right_n_head {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (T : Tape Γ) (i : ℕ) :
((Tape.move Dir.right)^[i] T).head = T.nth i := by
induction i generalizing T
· rfl
· simp only [*, Tape.move_right_nth, Int.ofNat_succ, iterate_succ, Function.comp_apply]
#align turing.tape.move_right_n_head Turing.Tape.move_right_n_head
/-- Replace the current value of the head on the tape. -/
def Tape.write {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (b : Γ) (T : Tape Γ) : Tape Γ :=
{ T with head := b }
#align turing.tape.write Turing.Tape.write
@[simp]
theorem Tape.write_self {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] : ∀ T : Tape Γ, T.write T.1 = T := by
rintro ⟨⟩; rfl
#align turing.tape.write_self Turing.Tape.write_self
@[simp]
theorem Tape.write_nth {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (b : Γ) :
∀ (T : Tape Γ) {i : ℤ}, (T.write b).nth i = if i = 0 then b else T.nth i
| _, 0 => rfl
| _, (_ + 1 : ℕ) => rfl
| _, -(_ + 1 : ℕ) => rfl
#align turing.tape.write_nth Turing.Tape.write_nth
@[simp]
theorem Tape.write_mk' {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (a b : Γ) (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L (R.cons a)).write b = Tape.mk' L (R.cons b) := by
simp only [Tape.write, Tape.mk', ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.tail_cons, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self_iff]
#align turing.tape.write_mk' Turing.Tape.write_mk'
/-- Apply a pointed map to a tape to change the alphabet. -/
def Tape.map {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (T : Tape Γ) : Tape Γ' :=
⟨f T.1, T.2.map f, T.3.map f⟩
#align turing.tape.map Turing.Tape.map
@[simp]
theorem Tape.map_fst {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') :
∀ T : Tape Γ, (T.map f).1 = f T.1 := by
rintro ⟨⟩; rfl
#align turing.tape.map_fst Turing.Tape.map_fst
@[simp]
theorem Tape.map_write {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (b : Γ) :
∀ T : Tape Γ, (T.write b).map f = (T.map f).write (f b) := by
rintro ⟨⟩; rfl
#align turing.tape.map_write Turing.Tape.map_write
-- Porting note: `simpNF` complains about LHS does not simplify when using the simp lemma on
-- itself, but it does indeed.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Tape.write_move_right_n {Γ} [Inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) (L R : ListBlank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
((Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' L R)).write (f (R.nth n)) =
(Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' L (R.modifyNth f n)) := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing L R
· simp only [ListBlank.nth_zero, ListBlank.modifyNth, iterate_zero_apply, Nat.zero_eq]
rw [← Tape.write_mk', ListBlank.cons_head_tail]
simp only [ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.nth_succ, ListBlank.modifyNth, Tape.move_right_mk',
ListBlank.tail_cons, iterate_succ_apply, IH]
#align turing.tape.write_move_right_n Turing.Tape.write_move_right_n
theorem Tape.map_move {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (T : Tape Γ) (d) :
(T.move d).map f = (T.map f).move d := by
cases T
cases d <;> simp only [Tape.move, Tape.map, ListBlank.head_map, eq_self_iff_true,
ListBlank.map_cons, and_self_iff, ListBlank.tail_map]
#align turing.tape.map_move Turing.Tape.map_move
theorem Tape.map_mk' {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (L R : ListBlank Γ) :
(Tape.mk' L R).map f = Tape.mk' (L.map f) (R.map f) := by
simp only [Tape.mk', Tape.map, ListBlank.head_map, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff,
ListBlank.tail_map]
#align turing.tape.map_mk' Turing.Tape.map_mk'
theorem Tape.map_mk₂ {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (L R : List Γ) :
(Tape.mk₂ L R).map f = Tape.mk₂ (L.map f) (R.map f) := by
simp only [Tape.mk₂, Tape.map_mk', ListBlank.map_mk]
#align turing.tape.map_mk₂ Turing.Tape.map_mk₂
theorem Tape.map_mk₁ {Γ Γ'} [Inhabited Γ] [Inhabited Γ'] (f : PointedMap Γ Γ') (l : List Γ) :
(Tape.mk₁ l).map f = Tape.mk₁ (l.map f) :=
Tape.map_mk₂ _ _ _
#align turing.tape.map_mk₁ Turing.Tape.map_mk₁
/-- Run a state transition function `σ → Option σ` "to completion". The return value is the last
state returned before a `none` result. If the state transition function always returns `some`,
then the computation diverges, returning `Part.none`. -/
def eval {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) : σ → Part σ :=
PFun.fix fun s ↦ Part.some <| (f s).elim (Sum.inl s) Sum.inr
#align turing.eval Turing.eval
/-- The reflexive transitive closure of a state transition function. `Reaches f a b` means
there is a finite sequence of steps `f a = some a₁`, `f a₁ = some a₂`, ... such that `aₙ = b`.
This relation permits zero steps of the state transition function. -/
def Reaches {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) : σ → σ → Prop :=
ReflTransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ f a
#align turing.reaches Turing.Reaches
/-- The transitive closure of a state transition function. `Reaches₁ f a b` means there is a
nonempty finite sequence of steps `f a = some a₁`, `f a₁ = some a₂`, ... such that `aₙ = b`.
This relation does not permit zero steps of the state transition function. -/
def Reaches₁ {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) : σ → σ → Prop :=
TransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ f a
#align turing.reaches₁ Turing.Reaches₁
theorem reaches₁_eq {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c} (h : f a = f b) :
Reaches₁ f a c ↔ Reaches₁ f b c :=
TransGen.head'_iff.trans (TransGen.head'_iff.trans <| by rw [h]).symm
#align turing.reaches₁_eq Turing.reaches₁_eq
theorem reaches_total {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c} (hab : Reaches f a b) (hac : Reaches f a c) :
Reaches f b c ∨ Reaches f c b :=
ReflTransGen.total_of_right_unique (fun _ _ _ ↦ Option.mem_unique) hab hac
#align turing.reaches_total Turing.reaches_total
theorem reaches₁_fwd {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c} (h₁ : Reaches₁ f a c) (h₂ : b ∈ f a) :
Reaches f b c := by
rcases TransGen.head'_iff.1 h₁ with ⟨b', hab, hbc⟩
cases Option.mem_unique hab h₂; exact hbc
#align turing.reaches₁_fwd Turing.reaches₁_fwd
/-- A variation on `Reaches`. `Reaches₀ f a b` holds if whenever `Reaches₁ f b c` then
`Reaches₁ f a c`. This is a weaker property than `Reaches` and is useful for replacing states with
equivalent states without taking a step. -/
def Reaches₀ {σ} (f : σ → Option σ) (a b : σ) : Prop :=
∀ c, Reaches₁ f b c → Reaches₁ f a c
#align turing.reaches₀ Turing.Reaches₀
theorem Reaches₀.trans {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h₁ : Reaches₀ f a b)
(h₂ : Reaches₀ f b c) : Reaches₀ f a c
| _, h₃ => h₁ _ (h₂ _ h₃)
#align turing.reaches₀.trans Turing.Reaches₀.trans
@[refl]
theorem Reaches₀.refl {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} (a : σ) : Reaches₀ f a a
| _, h => h
#align turing.reaches₀.refl Turing.Reaches₀.refl
theorem Reaches₀.single {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b : σ} (h : b ∈ f a) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h₂ => h₂.head h
#align turing.reaches₀.single Turing.Reaches₀.single
theorem Reaches₀.head {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h : b ∈ f a) (h₂ : Reaches₀ f b c) :
Reaches₀ f a c :=
(Reaches₀.single h).trans h₂
#align turing.reaches₀.head Turing.Reaches₀.head
theorem Reaches₀.tail {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h₁ : Reaches₀ f a b) (h : c ∈ f b) :
Reaches₀ f a c :=
h₁.trans (Reaches₀.single h)
#align turing.reaches₀.tail Turing.Reaches₀.tail
theorem reaches₀_eq {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (e : f a = f b) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h => (reaches₁_eq e).2 h
#align turing.reaches₀_eq Turing.reaches₀_eq
theorem Reaches₁.to₀ {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b : σ} (h : Reaches₁ f a b) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h₂ => h.trans h₂
#align turing.reaches₁.to₀ Turing.Reaches₁.to₀
theorem Reaches.to₀ {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b : σ} (h : Reaches f a b) : Reaches₀ f a b
| _, h₂ => h₂.trans_right h
#align turing.reaches.to₀ Turing.Reaches.to₀
theorem Reaches₀.tail' {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b c : σ} (h : Reaches₀ f a b) (h₂ : c ∈ f b) :
Reaches₁ f a c :=
h _ (TransGen.single h₂)
#align turing.reaches₀.tail' Turing.Reaches₀.tail'
/-- (co-)Induction principle for `eval`. If a property `C` holds of any point `a` evaluating to `b`
which is either terminal (meaning `a = b`) or where the next point also satisfies `C`, then it
holds of any point where `eval f a` evaluates to `b`. This formalizes the notion that if
`eval f a` evaluates to `b` then it reaches terminal state `b` in finitely many steps. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def evalInduction {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {b : σ} {C : σ → Sort*} {a : σ}
(h : b ∈ eval f a) (H : ∀ a, b ∈ eval f a → (∀ a', f a = some a' → C a') → C a) : C a :=
PFun.fixInduction h fun a' ha' h' ↦
H _ ha' fun b' e ↦ h' _ <| Part.mem_some_iff.2 <| by rw [e]; rfl
#align turing.eval_induction Turing.evalInduction
theorem mem_eval {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} : b ∈ eval f a ↔ Reaches f a b ∧ f b = none := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: Explicitly specify `c`.
refine @evalInduction _ _ _ (fun a ↦ Reaches f a b ∧ f b = none) _ h fun a h IH ↦ ?_
cases' e : f a with a'
· rw [Part.mem_unique h
(PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 <| Or.inl <| Part.mem_some_iff.2 <| by rw [e] <;> rfl)]
exact ⟨ReflTransGen.refl, e⟩
· rcases PFun.mem_fix_iff.1 h with (h | ⟨_, h, _⟩) <;> rw [e] at h <;>
cases Part.mem_some_iff.1 h
cases' IH a' e with h₁ h₂
exact ⟨ReflTransGen.head e h₁, h₂⟩
· refine ReflTransGen.head_induction_on h₁ ?_ fun h _ IH ↦ ?_
· refine PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inl ?_)
rw [h₂]
apply Part.mem_some
· refine PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, ?_, IH⟩)
rw [h]
apply Part.mem_some
#align turing.mem_eval Turing.mem_eval
theorem eval_maximal₁ {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (h : b ∈ eval f a) (c) : ¬Reaches₁ f b c
| bc => by
let ⟨_, b0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
let ⟨b', h', _⟩ := TransGen.head'_iff.1 bc
cases b0.symm.trans h'
#align turing.eval_maximal₁ Turing.eval_maximal₁
theorem eval_maximal {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (h : b ∈ eval f a) {c} : Reaches f b c ↔ c = b :=
let ⟨_, b0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun b' h' ↦ by cases b0.symm.trans h'
#align turing.eval_maximal Turing.eval_maximal
theorem reaches_eval {σ} {f : σ → Option σ} {a b} (ab : Reaches f a b) : eval f a = eval f b := by
refine Part.ext fun _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· have ⟨ac, c0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
exact mem_eval.2 ⟨(or_iff_left_of_imp fun cb ↦ (eval_maximal h).1 cb ▸ ReflTransGen.refl).1
(reaches_total ab ac), c0⟩
· have ⟨bc, c0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h
exact mem_eval.2 ⟨ab.trans bc, c0⟩
#align turing.reaches_eval Turing.reaches_eval
/-- Given a relation `tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop` between state spaces, and state transition functions
`f₁ : σ₁ → Option σ₁` and `f₂ : σ₂ → Option σ₂`, `Respects f₁ f₂ tr` means that if `tr a₁ a₂` holds
initially and `f₁` takes a step to `a₂` then `f₂` will take one or more steps before reaching a
state `b₂` satisfying `tr a₂ b₂`, and if `f₁ a₁` terminates then `f₂ a₂` also terminates.
Such a relation `tr` is also known as a refinement. -/
def Respects {σ₁ σ₂} (f₁ : σ₁ → Option σ₁) (f₂ : σ₂ → Option σ₂) (tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂⦄, tr a₁ a₂ → (match f₁ a₁ with
| some b₁ => ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ Reaches₁ f₂ a₂ b₂
| none => f₂ a₂ = none : Prop)
#align turing.respects Turing.Respects
theorem tr_reaches₁ {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop} (H : Respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂}
(aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₁} (ab : Reaches₁ f₁ a₁ b₁) : ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ Reaches₁ f₂ a₂ b₂ := by
induction' ab with c₁ ac c₁ d₁ _ cd IH
· have := H aa
rwa [show f₁ a₁ = _ from ac] at this
· rcases IH with ⟨c₂, cc, ac₂⟩
have := H cc
rw [show f₁ c₁ = _ from cd] at this
rcases this with ⟨d₂, dd, cd₂⟩
exact ⟨_, dd, ac₂.trans cd₂⟩
#align turing.tr_reaches₁ Turing.tr_reaches₁
theorem tr_reaches {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop} (H : Respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂}
(aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₁} (ab : Reaches f₁ a₁ b₁) : ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ Reaches f₂ a₂ b₂ := by
rcases reflTransGen_iff_eq_or_transGen.1 ab with (rfl | ab)
· exact ⟨_, aa, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
· have ⟨b₂, bb, h⟩ := tr_reaches₁ H aa ab
exact ⟨b₂, bb, h.to_reflTransGen⟩
#align turing.tr_reaches Turing.tr_reaches
| Mathlib/Computability/TuringMachine.lean | 909 | 926 | theorem tr_reaches_rev {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop} (H : Respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂}
(aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₂} (ab : Reaches f₂ a₂ b₂) :
∃ c₁ c₂, Reaches f₂ b₂ c₂ ∧ tr c₁ c₂ ∧ Reaches f₁ a₁ c₁ := by |
induction' ab with c₂ d₂ _ cd IH
· exact ⟨_, _, ReflTransGen.refl, aa, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
· rcases IH with ⟨e₁, e₂, ce, ee, ae⟩
rcases ReflTransGen.cases_head ce with (rfl | ⟨d', cd', de⟩)
· have := H ee
revert this
cases' eg : f₁ e₁ with g₁ <;> simp only [Respects, and_imp, exists_imp]
· intro c0
cases cd.symm.trans c0
· intro g₂ gg cg
rcases TransGen.head'_iff.1 cg with ⟨d', cd', dg⟩
cases Option.mem_unique cd cd'
exact ⟨_, _, dg, gg, ae.tail eg⟩
· cases Option.mem_unique cd cd'
exact ⟨_, _, de, ee, ae⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Independent
#align_import analysis.convex.simplicial_complex.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Simplicial complexes
In this file, we define simplicial complexes in `𝕜`-modules. A simplicial complex is a collection
of simplices closed by inclusion (of vertices) and intersection (of underlying sets).
We model them by a downward-closed set of affine independent finite sets whose convex hulls "glue
nicely", each finite set and its convex hull corresponding respectively to the vertices and the
underlying set of a simplex.
## Main declarations
* `SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E`: A simplicial complex in the `𝕜`-module `E`.
* `SimplicialComplex.vertices`: The zero dimensional faces of a simplicial complex.
* `SimplicialComplex.facets`: The maximal faces of a simplicial complex.
## Notation
`s ∈ K` means that `s` is a face of `K`.
`K ≤ L` means that the faces of `K` are faces of `L`.
## Implementation notes
"glue nicely" usually means that the intersection of two faces (as sets in the ambient space) is a
face. Given that we store the vertices, not the faces, this would be a bit awkward to spell.
Instead, `SimplicialComplex.inter_subset_convexHull` is an equivalent condition which works on the
vertices.
## TODO
Simplicial complexes can be generalized to affine spaces once `ConvexHull` has been ported.
-/
open Finset Set
variable (𝕜 E : Type*) {ι : Type*} [OrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
namespace Geometry
-- TODO: update to new binder order? not sure what binder order is correct for `down_closed`.
/-- A simplicial complex in a `𝕜`-module is a collection of simplices which glue nicely together.
Note that the textbook meaning of "glue nicely" is given in
`Geometry.SimplicialComplex.disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convexHull`. It is mostly useless, as
`Geometry.SimplicialComplex.convexHull_inter_convexHull` is enough for all purposes. -/
@[ext]
structure SimplicialComplex where
/-- the faces of this simplicial complex: currently, given by their spanning vertices -/
faces : Set (Finset E)
/-- the empty set is not a face: hence, all faces are non-empty -/
not_empty_mem : ∅ ∉ faces
/-- the vertices in each face are affine independent: this is an implementation detail -/
indep : ∀ {s}, s ∈ faces → AffineIndependent 𝕜 ((↑) : s → E)
/-- faces are downward closed: a non-empty subset of its spanning vertices spans another face -/
down_closed : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ⊆ s → t ≠ ∅ → t ∈ faces
inter_subset_convexHull : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ∈ faces →
convexHull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convexHull 𝕜 ↑t ⊆ convexHull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : Set E)
#align geometry.simplicial_complex Geometry.SimplicialComplex
namespace SimplicialComplex
variable {𝕜 E}
variable {K : SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E} {s t : Finset E} {x : E}
/-- A `Finset` belongs to a `SimplicialComplex` if it's a face of it. -/
instance : Membership (Finset E) (SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E) :=
⟨fun s K => s ∈ K.faces⟩
/-- The underlying space of a simplicial complex is the union of its faces. -/
def space (K : SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E) : Set E :=
⋃ s ∈ K.faces, convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E)
#align geometry.simplicial_complex.space Geometry.SimplicialComplex.space
-- Porting note: Expanded `∃ s ∈ K.faces` to get the type to match more closely with Lean 3
theorem mem_space_iff : x ∈ K.space ↔ ∃ s ∈ K.faces, x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E) := by
simp [space]
#align geometry.simplicial_complex.mem_space_iff Geometry.SimplicialComplex.mem_space_iff
-- Porting note: Original proof was `:= subset_biUnion_of_mem hs`
theorem convexHull_subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : convexHull 𝕜 ↑s ⊆ K.space := by
convert subset_biUnion_of_mem hs
rfl
#align geometry.simplicial_complex.convex_hull_subset_space Geometry.SimplicialComplex.convexHull_subset_space
protected theorem subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : (s : Set E) ⊆ K.space :=
(subset_convexHull 𝕜 _).trans <| convexHull_subset_space hs
#align geometry.simplicial_complex.subset_space Geometry.SimplicialComplex.subset_space
theorem convexHull_inter_convexHull (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
convexHull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convexHull 𝕜 ↑t = convexHull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : Set E) :=
(K.inter_subset_convexHull hs ht).antisymm <|
subset_inter (convexHull_mono Set.inter_subset_left) <|
convexHull_mono Set.inter_subset_right
#align geometry.simplicial_complex.convex_hull_inter_convex_hull Geometry.SimplicialComplex.convexHull_inter_convexHull
/-- The conclusion is the usual meaning of "glue nicely" in textbooks. It turns out to be quite
unusable, as it's about faces as sets in space rather than simplices. Further, additional structure
on `𝕜` means the only choice of `u` is `s ∩ t` (but it's hard to prove). -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/SimplicialComplex/Basic.lean | 110 | 119 | theorem disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convexHull (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
Disjoint (convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E)) (convexHull 𝕜 ↑t) ∨
∃ u ∈ K.faces, convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E) ∩ convexHull 𝕜 ↑t = convexHull 𝕜 ↑u := by |
classical
by_contra! h
refine h.2 (s ∩ t) (K.down_closed hs inter_subset_left fun hst => h.1 <|
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| (K.inter_subset_convexHull hs ht).trans ?_) ?_
· rw [← coe_inter, hst, coe_empty, convexHull_empty]
rfl
· rw [coe_inter, convexHull_inter_convexHull hs ht]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import data.real.irrational from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e7aaccf9b0182576cabdde36cf1b5ad3585b70d"
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `sqrt q` is irrational if and only if
`Rat.sqrt q * Rat.sqrt q ≠ q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
-/
open Rat Real multiplicity
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
#align irrational Irrational
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
#align irrational_iff_ne_rational irrational_iff_ne_rational
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
#align transcendental.irrational Transcendental.irrational
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
#align irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : (multiplicity (p : ℤ) m).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, hm⟩) % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity.one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
erw [multiplicity.pow' (Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1) (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, this⟩),
Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
#align irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv :
(multiplicity (p : ℤ) m).get (finite_int_iff.2 ⟨hp.1.ne_one, (ne_of_lt hm).symm⟩) % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
#align irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
@irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd p (Int.natCast_pos.2 hp.pos) p ⟨hp⟩ <| by
simp [multiplicity.multiplicity_self
(mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 (mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.not_dvd_one))]
#align nat.prime.irrational_sqrt Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
#align irrational_sqrt_two irrational_sqrt_two
theorem irrational_sqrt_rat_iff (q : ℚ) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ Rat.sqrt q * Rat.sqrt q ≠ q ∧ 0 ≤ q :=
if H1 : Rat.sqrt q * Rat.sqrt q = q then
iff_of_false
(not_not_intro
⟨Rat.sqrt q, by
rw [← H1, cast_mul, sqrt_mul_self (cast_nonneg.2 <| Rat.sqrt_nonneg q), sqrt_eq,
abs_of_nonneg (Rat.sqrt_nonneg q)]⟩)
fun h => h.1 H1
else
if H2 : 0 ≤ q then
iff_of_true
(fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
H1 <|
(exists_mul_self _).1
⟨r, by
rwa [eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (cast_nonneg.2 H2), ← cast_mul,
Rat.cast_inj] at hr
rw [← hr]
exact Real.sqrt_nonneg _⟩)
⟨H1, H2⟩
else
iff_of_false
(not_not_intro
⟨0, by
rw [cast_zero]
exact (sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 <| le_of_not_le H2)).symm⟩)
fun h => H2 h.2
#align irrational_sqrt_rat_iff irrational_sqrt_rat_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ (irrational_sqrt_rat_iff q)
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
#align irrational.ne_rat Irrational.ne_rat
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
#align irrational.ne_int Irrational.ne_int
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
#align irrational.ne_nat Irrational.ne_nat
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
#align irrational.ne_zero Irrational.ne_zero
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
#align irrational.ne_one Irrational.ne_one
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
#align rat.not_irrational Rat.not_irrational
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
#align int.not_irrational Int.not_irrational
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
#align nat.not_irrational Nat.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
#align irrational.add_cases Irrational.add_cases
theorem of_rat_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_rat_add Irrational.of_rat_add
theorem rat_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_rat_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
#align irrational.rat_add Irrational.rat_add
theorem of_add_rat : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_rat_add q
#align irrational.of_add_rat Irrational.of_add_rat
theorem add_rat (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.rat_add q
#align irrational.add_rat Irrational.add_rat
theorem of_int_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_rat_add m
#align irrational.of_int_add Irrational.of_int_add
theorem of_add_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_int_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
#align irrational.of_add_int Irrational.of_add_int
theorem int_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.rat_add m
#align irrational.int_add Irrational.int_add
theorem add_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.int_add m
#align irrational.add_int Irrational.add_int
theorem of_nat_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_add m
#align irrational.of_nat_add Irrational.of_nat_add
theorem of_add_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_int m
#align irrational.of_add_nat Irrational.of_add_nat
theorem nat_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.int_add m
#align irrational.nat_add Irrational.nat_add
theorem add_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_int m
#align irrational.add_nat Irrational.add_nat
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
#align irrational.of_neg Irrational.of_neg
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
#align irrational.neg Irrational.neg
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_rat (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_rat (-q)
#align irrational.sub_rat Irrational.sub_rat
theorem rat_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.rat_add q
#align irrational.rat_sub Irrational.rat_sub
theorem of_sub_rat (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_rat (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
#align irrational.of_sub_rat Irrational.of_sub_rat
theorem of_rat_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_rat_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
#align irrational.of_rat_sub Irrational.of_rat_sub
theorem sub_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_rat m
#align irrational.sub_int Irrational.sub_int
theorem int_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.rat_sub m
#align irrational.int_sub Irrational.int_sub
theorem of_sub_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_rat m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_sub_int Irrational.of_sub_int
theorem of_int_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_rat_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_int_sub Irrational.of_int_sub
theorem sub_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_int m
#align irrational.sub_nat Irrational.sub_nat
theorem nat_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.int_sub m
#align irrational.nat_sub Irrational.nat_sub
theorem of_sub_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_int m
#align irrational.of_sub_nat Irrational.of_sub_nat
theorem of_nat_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_sub m
#align irrational.of_nat_sub Irrational.of_nat_sub
/-!
#### Multiplication by rational numbers
-/
theorem mul_cases : Irrational (x * y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx * ry, cast_mul rx ry⟩
#align irrational.mul_cases Irrational.mul_cases
theorem of_mul_rat (h : Irrational (x * q)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_mul_rat Irrational.of_mul_rat
theorem mul_rat (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * q) :=
of_mul_rat q⁻¹ <| by rwa [mul_assoc, ← cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel hq, cast_one, mul_one]
#align irrational.mul_rat Irrational.mul_rat
theorem of_rat_mul : Irrational (q * x) → Irrational x :=
mul_comm x q ▸ of_mul_rat q
#align irrational.of_rat_mul Irrational.of_rat_mul
theorem rat_mul (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q * x) :=
mul_comm x q ▸ h.mul_rat hq
#align irrational.rat_mul Irrational.rat_mul
theorem of_mul_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
of_mul_rat m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_mul_int Irrational.of_mul_int
theorem of_int_mul (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
of_rat_mul m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
#align irrational.of_int_mul Irrational.of_int_mul
theorem mul_int (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.mul_rat ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational.mul_int Irrational.mul_int
theorem int_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
mul_comm x m ▸ h.mul_int hm
#align irrational.int_mul Irrational.int_mul
theorem of_mul_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_mul_int m
#align irrational.of_mul_nat Irrational.of_mul_nat
theorem of_nat_mul (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_mul m
#align irrational.of_nat_mul Irrational.of_nat_mul
theorem mul_nat (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) :=
h.mul_int <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
#align irrational.mul_nat Irrational.mul_nat
theorem nat_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
h.int_mul <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
#align irrational.nat_mul Irrational.nat_mul
/-!
#### Inverse
-/
theorem of_inv (h : Irrational x⁻¹) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => h <| hq ▸ ⟨q⁻¹, q.cast_inv⟩
#align irrational.of_inv Irrational.of_inv
protected theorem inv (h : Irrational x) : Irrational x⁻¹ :=
of_inv <| by rwa [inv_inv]
#align irrational.inv Irrational.inv
/-!
#### Division
-/
theorem div_cases (h : Irrational (x / y)) : Irrational x ∨ Irrational y :=
h.mul_cases.imp id of_inv
#align irrational.div_cases Irrational.div_cases
theorem of_rat_div (h : Irrational (q / x)) : Irrational x :=
(h.of_rat_mul q).of_inv
#align irrational.of_rat_div Irrational.of_rat_div
theorem of_div_rat (h : Irrational (x / q)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_div_rat Irrational.of_div_rat
theorem rat_div (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q / x) :=
h.inv.rat_mul hq
#align irrational.rat_div Irrational.rat_div
theorem div_rat (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / q) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← cast_inv]
exact h.mul_rat (inv_ne_zero hq)
#align irrational.div_rat Irrational.div_rat
theorem of_int_div (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_left m.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_int_div Irrational.of_int_div
theorem of_div_int (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right m.not_irrational
#align irrational.of_div_int Irrational.of_div_int
theorem int_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.int_mul hm
#align irrational.int_div Irrational.int_div
theorem div_int (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.div_rat ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational.div_int Irrational.div_int
theorem of_nat_div (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_int_div m
#align irrational.of_nat_div Irrational.of_nat_div
theorem of_div_nat (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_div_int m
#align irrational.of_div_nat Irrational.of_div_nat
theorem nat_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.nat_mul hm
#align irrational.nat_div Irrational.nat_div
theorem div_nat (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) :=
h.div_int <| by rwa [Int.natCast_ne_zero]
#align irrational.div_nat Irrational.div_nat
theorem of_one_div (h : Irrational (1 / x)) : Irrational x :=
of_rat_div 1 <| by rwa [cast_one]
#align irrational.of_one_div Irrational.of_one_div
/-!
#### Natural and integer power
-/
theorem of_mul_self (h : Irrational (x * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.elim id id
#align irrational.of_mul_self Irrational.of_mul_self
theorem of_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, Irrational (x ^ n) → Irrational x
| 0 => fun h => by
rw [pow_zero] at h
exact (h ⟨1, cast_one⟩).elim
| n + 1 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ] at h
exact h.mul_cases.elim (of_pow n) id
#align irrational.of_pow Irrational.of_pow
open Int in
theorem of_zpow : ∀ m : ℤ, Irrational (x ^ m) → Irrational x
| (n : ℕ) => fun h => by
rw [zpow_natCast] at h
exact h.of_pow _
| -[n+1] => fun h => by
rw [zpow_negSucc] at h
exact h.of_inv.of_pow _
#align irrational.of_zpow Irrational.of_zpow
end Irrational
section Polynomial
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable (x : ℝ) (p : ℤ[X])
theorem one_lt_natDegree_of_irrational_root (hx : Irrational x) (p_nonzero : p ≠ 0)
(x_is_root : aeval x p = 0) : 1 < p.natDegree := by
by_contra rid
rcases exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (not_lt.1 rid) with ⟨a, b, rfl⟩
clear rid
have : (a : ℝ) * x = -b := by simpa [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero] using x_is_root
rcases em (a = 0) with (rfl | ha)
· obtain rfl : b = 0 := by simpa
simp at p_nonzero
· rw [mul_comm, ← eq_div_iff_mul_eq, eq_comm] at this
· refine hx ⟨-b / a, ?_⟩
assumption_mod_cast
· assumption_mod_cast
#align one_lt_nat_degree_of_irrational_root one_lt_natDegree_of_irrational_root
end Polynomial
section
variable {q : ℚ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} {x : ℝ}
open Irrational
/-!
### Simplification lemmas about operations
-/
@[simp]
theorem irrational_rat_add_iff : Irrational (q + x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_rat_add q, rat_add q⟩
#align irrational_rat_add_iff irrational_rat_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_int_add_iff : Irrational (m + x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_int_add m, fun h => h.int_add m⟩
#align irrational_int_add_iff irrational_int_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_nat_add_iff : Irrational (n + x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_nat_add n, fun h => h.nat_add n⟩
#align irrational_nat_add_iff irrational_nat_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_add_rat_iff : Irrational (x + q) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_add_rat q, add_rat q⟩
#align irrational_add_rat_iff irrational_add_rat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_add_int_iff : Irrational (x + m) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_add_int m, fun h => h.add_int m⟩
#align irrational_add_int_iff irrational_add_int_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_add_nat_iff : Irrational (x + n) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_add_nat n, fun h => h.add_nat n⟩
#align irrational_add_nat_iff irrational_add_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_rat_sub_iff : Irrational (q - x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_rat_sub q, rat_sub q⟩
#align irrational_rat_sub_iff irrational_rat_sub_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_int_sub_iff : Irrational (m - x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_int_sub m, fun h => h.int_sub m⟩
#align irrational_int_sub_iff irrational_int_sub_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_nat_sub_iff : Irrational (n - x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_nat_sub n, fun h => h.nat_sub n⟩
#align irrational_nat_sub_iff irrational_nat_sub_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_sub_rat_iff : Irrational (x - q) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_sub_rat q, sub_rat q⟩
#align irrational_sub_rat_iff irrational_sub_rat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_sub_int_iff : Irrational (x - m) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_sub_int m, fun h => h.sub_int m⟩
#align irrational_sub_int_iff irrational_sub_int_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_sub_nat_iff : Irrational (x - n) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_sub_nat n, fun h => h.sub_nat n⟩
#align irrational_sub_nat_iff irrational_sub_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_neg_iff : Irrational (-x) ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_neg, Irrational.neg⟩
#align irrational_neg_iff irrational_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_inv_iff : Irrational x⁻¹ ↔ Irrational x :=
⟨of_inv, Irrational.inv⟩
#align irrational_inv_iff irrational_inv_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_rat_mul_iff : Irrational (q * x) ↔ q ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Rat.cast_ne_zero.1 <| left_ne_zero_of_mul h.ne_zero, h.of_rat_mul q⟩, fun h =>
h.2.rat_mul h.1⟩
#align irrational_rat_mul_iff irrational_rat_mul_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_mul_rat_iff : Irrational (x * q) ↔ q ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [mul_comm, irrational_rat_mul_iff]
#align irrational_mul_rat_iff irrational_mul_rat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_int_mul_iff : Irrational (m * x) ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast, irrational_rat_mul_iff, Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_int_mul_iff irrational_int_mul_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_mul_int_iff : Irrational (x * m) ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast, irrational_mul_rat_iff, Int.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_mul_int_iff irrational_mul_int_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_nat_mul_iff : Irrational (n * x) ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_natCast, irrational_rat_mul_iff, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_nat_mul_iff irrational_nat_mul_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_mul_nat_iff : Irrational (x * n) ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_natCast, irrational_mul_rat_iff, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
#align irrational_mul_nat_iff irrational_mul_nat_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_rat_div_iff : Irrational (q / x) ↔ q ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align irrational_rat_div_iff irrational_rat_div_iff
@[simp]
theorem irrational_div_rat_iff : Irrational (x / q) ↔ q ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← cast_inv, irrational_mul_rat_iff, Ne, inv_eq_zero]
#align irrational_div_rat_iff irrational_div_rat_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 636 | 637 | theorem irrational_int_div_iff : Irrational (m / x) ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ Irrational x := by |
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import algebra.ring_quot from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e5820f6c8fcf1b75bcd7738ae4da1c5896191f72"
/-!
# Quotients of non-commutative rings
Unfortunately, ideals have only been developed in the commutative case as `Ideal`,
and it's not immediately clear how one should formalise ideals in the non-commutative case.
In this file, we directly define the quotient of a semiring by any relation,
by building a bigger relation that represents the ideal generated by that relation.
We prove the universal properties of the quotient, and recommend avoiding relying on the actual
definition, which is made irreducible for this purpose.
Since everything runs in parallel for quotients of `R`-algebras, we do that case at the same time.
-/
universe uR uS uT uA u₄
variable {R : Type uR} [Semiring R]
variable {S : Type uS} [CommSemiring S]
variable {T : Type uT}
variable {A : Type uA} [Semiring A] [Algebra S A]
namespace RingCon
instance (c : RingCon A) : Algebra S c.Quotient where
smul := (· • ·)
toRingHom := c.mk'.comp (algebraMap S A)
commutes' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algebraMap (c : RingCon A) (s : S) :
(algebraMap S A s : c.Quotient) = algebraMap S _ s :=
rfl
#align ring_con.coe_algebra_map RingCon.coe_algebraMap
end RingCon
namespace RingQuot
/-- Given an arbitrary relation `r` on a ring, we strengthen it to a relation `Rel r`,
such that the equivalence relation generated by `Rel r` has `x ~ y` if and only if
`x - y` is in the ideal generated by elements `a - b` such that `r a b`.
-/
inductive Rel (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of ⦃x y : R⦄ (h : r x y) : Rel r x y
| add_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_right ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r b c → Rel r (a * b) (a * c)
#align ring_quot.rel RingQuot.Rel
theorem Rel.add_right {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) : Rel r (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm a b, add_comm a c]
exact Rel.add_left h
#align ring_quot.rel.add_right RingQuot.Rel.add_right
theorem Rel.neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (-a) (-b) := by simp only [neg_eq_neg_one_mul a, neg_eq_neg_one_mul b, Rel.mul_right h]
#align ring_quot.rel.neg RingQuot.Rel.neg
theorem Rel.sub_left {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (a - c) (b - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.add_left]
#align ring_quot.rel.sub_left RingQuot.Rel.sub_left
theorem Rel.sub_right {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) :
Rel r (a - b) (a - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.neg.add_right]
#align ring_quot.rel.sub_right RingQuot.Rel.sub_right
theorem Rel.smul {r : A → A → Prop} (k : S) ⦃a b : A⦄ (h : Rel r a b) : Rel r (k • a) (k • b) := by
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, Rel.mul_right h]
#align ring_quot.rel.smul RingQuot.Rel.smul
/-- `EqvGen (RingQuot.Rel r)` is a ring congruence. -/
def ringCon (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := EqvGen (Rel r)
iseqv := EqvGen.is_equivalence _
add' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.add_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| EqvGen.refl _)
mul' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.mul_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| EqvGen.refl _)
#align ring_quot.ring_con RingQuot.ringCon
theorem eqvGen_rel_eq (r : R → R → Prop) : EqvGen (Rel r) = RingConGen.Rel r := by
ext x₁ x₂
constructor
· intro h
induction h with
| rel _ _ h => induction h with
| of => exact RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ ‹_›
| add_left _ h => exact h.add (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_left _ h => exact h.mul (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_right _ h => exact (RingConGen.Rel.refl _).mul h
| refl => exact RingConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm => exact RingConGen.Rel.symm ‹_›
| trans => exact RingConGen.Rel.trans ‹_› ‹_›
· intro h
induction h with
| of => exact EqvGen.rel _ _ (Rel.of ‹_›)
| refl => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).refl _
| symm => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).symm ‹_›
| trans => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).trans ‹_› ‹_›
| add => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).add ‹_› ‹_›
| mul => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).mul ‹_› ‹_›
#align ring_quot.eqv_gen_rel_eq RingQuot.eqvGen_rel_eq
end RingQuot
/-- The quotient of a ring by an arbitrary relation. -/
structure RingQuot (r : R → R → Prop) where
toQuot : Quot (RingQuot.Rel r)
#align ring_quot RingQuot
namespace RingQuot
variable (r : R → R → Prop)
-- can't be irreducible, causes diamonds in ℕ-algebras
private def natCast (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ n⟩
private irreducible_def zero : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩
private irreducible_def one : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩
private irreducible_def add : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· + ·) Rel.add_right Rel.add_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def mul : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· * ·) Rel.mul_right Rel.mul_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ -a) Rel.neg a⟩
private irreducible_def sub {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ Sub.sub Rel.sub_right Rel.sub_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def npow (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ =>
⟨Quot.lift (fun a ↦ Quot.mk (RingQuot.Rel r) (a ^ n))
(fun a b (h : Rel r a b) ↦ by
-- note we can't define a `Rel.pow` as `Rel` isn't reflexive so `Rel r 1 1` isn't true
dsimp only
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
-- Porting note:
-- `simpa [mul_def] using congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) (Quot.sound h) ih`
-- mysteriously doesn't work
have := congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) ih (Quot.sound h)
dsimp only at this
simp? [mul_def] at this says simp only [mul_def, Quot.map₂_mk, mk.injEq] at this
exact this)
a⟩
-- note: this cannot be irreducible, as otherwise diamonds don't commute.
private def smul [Algebra S R] (n : S) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ n • a) (Rel.smul n) a⟩
instance : NatCast (RingQuot r) :=
⟨natCast r⟩
instance : Zero (RingQuot r) :=
⟨zero r⟩
instance : One (RingQuot r) :=
⟨one r⟩
instance : Add (RingQuot r) :=
⟨add r⟩
instance : Mul (RingQuot r) :=
⟨mul r⟩
instance : NatPow (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun x n ↦ npow r n x⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Neg (RingQuot r) :=
⟨neg r⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Sub (RingQuot r) :=
⟨sub r⟩
instance [Algebra S R] : SMul S (RingQuot r) :=
⟨smul r⟩
theorem zero_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩ : RingQuot r) = 0 :=
show _ = zero r by rw [zero_def]
#align ring_quot.zero_quot RingQuot.zero_quot
theorem one_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩ : RingQuot r) = 1 :=
show _ = one r by rw [one_def]
#align ring_quot.one_quot RingQuot.one_quot
| Mathlib/Algebra/RingQuot.lean | 236 | 239 | theorem add_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ + ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a + b)⟩ := by |
show add r _ _ = _
rw [add_def]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Center
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Centralizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.End
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subsemigroup.Centralizer
#align_import ring_theory.non_unital_subsemiring.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b915e9392ecb2a861e1e766f0e1df6ac481188ca"
/-!
# Bundled non-unital subsemirings
We define bundled non-unital subsemirings and some standard constructions:
`CompleteLattice` structure, `subtype` and `inclusion` ring homomorphisms, non-unital subsemiring
`map`, `comap` and range (`srange`) of a `NonUnitalRingHom` etc.
-/
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (M : Subsemigroup R)
/-- `NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R` states that `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ R` that
are both an additive submonoid and also a multiplicative subsemigroup. -/
class NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (S : Type*) (R : Type u) [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R]
[SetLike S R] extends AddSubmonoidClass S R : Prop where
mul_mem : ∀ {s : S} {a b : R}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a * b ∈ s
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class NonUnitalSubsemiringClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.mulMemClass (S : Type*) (R : Type u)
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [SetLike S R] [h : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] :
MulMemClass S R :=
{ h with }
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class.mul_mem_class NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.mulMemClass
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiringClass
variable [SetLike S R] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] (s : S)
open AddSubmonoidClass
/- Prefer subclasses of `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` over subclasses of
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass`. -/
/-- A non-unital subsemiring of a `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` inherits a
`NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` structure -/
instance (priority := 75) toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (↑) rfl (by simp) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class.to_non_unital_non_assoc_semiring NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
instance noZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.noZeroDivisors (↑) rfl fun _ _ => rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class.no_zero_divisors NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors
/-- The natural non-unital ring hom from a non-unital subsemiring of a non-unital semiring `R` to
`R`. -/
def subtype : s →ₙ+* R :=
{ AddSubmonoidClass.subtype s, MulMemClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class.subtype NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype
@[simp]
theorem coeSubtype : (subtype s : s → R) = ((↑) : s → R) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class.coe_subtype NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.coeSubtype
/-- A non-unital subsemiring of a `NonUnitalSemiring` is a `NonUnitalSemiring`. -/
instance toNonUnitalSemiring {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] [SetLike S R]
[NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] : NonUnitalSemiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.nonUnitalSemiring (↑) rfl (by simp) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class.to_non_unital_semiring NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalSemiring
/-- A non-unital subsemiring of a `NonUnitalCommSemiring` is a `NonUnitalCommSemiring`. -/
instance toNonUnitalCommSemiring {R} [NonUnitalCommSemiring R] [SetLike S R]
[NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] : NonUnitalCommSemiring s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.nonUnitalCommSemiring (↑) rfl (by simp) (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring_class.to_non_unital_comm_semiring NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalCommSemiring
/-! Note: currently, there are no ordered versions of non-unital rings. -/
end NonUnitalSubsemiringClass
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring T]
/-- A non-unital subsemiring of a non-unital semiring `R` is a subset `s` that is both an additive
submonoid and a semigroup. -/
structure NonUnitalSubsemiring (R : Type u) [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] extends AddSubmonoid R,
Subsemigroup R
#align non_unital_subsemiring NonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as a `Subsemigroup`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
instance : SetLike (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) R where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) R where
zero_mem {s} := AddSubmonoid.zero_mem' s.toAddSubmonoid
add_mem {s} := AddSubsemigroup.add_mem' s.toAddSubmonoid.toAddSubsemigroup
mul_mem {s} := mul_mem' s
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_carrier NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_carrier
/-- Two non-unital subsemirings are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align non_unital_subsemiring.ext NonUnitalSubsemiring.ext
/-- Copy of a non-unital subsemiring with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ S.toAddSubmonoid.copy s hs, S.toSubsemigroup.copy s hs with carrier := s }
#align non_unital_subsemiring.copy NonUnitalSubsemiring.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_copy NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (s : Set R) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align non_unital_subsemiring.copy_eq NonUnitalSubsemiring.copy_eq
theorem toSubsemigroup_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubsemigroup : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → Subsemigroup R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align non_unital_subsemiring.to_subsemigroup_injective NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup_injective
@[mono]
theorem toSubsemigroup_strictMono :
StrictMono (toSubsemigroup : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → Subsemigroup R) := fun _ _ => id
#align non_unital_subsemiring.to_subsemigroup_strict_mono NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toSubsemigroup_mono : Monotone (toSubsemigroup : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → Subsemigroup R) :=
toSubsemigroup_strictMono.monotone
#align non_unital_subsemiring.to_subsemigroup_mono NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup_mono
theorem toAddSubmonoid_injective :
Function.Injective (toAddSubmonoid : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R)
| _, _, h => ext (SetLike.ext_iff.mp h : _)
#align non_unital_subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_injective NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_strictMono :
StrictMono (toAddSubmonoid : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) := fun _ _ => id
#align non_unital_subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toAddSubmonoid : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) :=
toAddSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align non_unital_subsemiring.to_add_submonoid_mono NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid_mono
/-- Construct a `NonUnitalSubsemiring R` from a set `s`, a subsemigroup `sg`, and an additive
submonoid `sa` such that `x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ sg ↔ x ∈ sa`. -/
protected def mk' (s : Set R) (sg : Subsemigroup R) (hg : ↑sg = s) (sa : AddSubmonoid R)
(ha : ↑sa = s) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by subst ha; exact sa.zero_mem
add_mem' := by subst ha; exact sa.add_mem
mul_mem' := by subst hg; exact sg.mul_mem
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mk' NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' {s : Set R} {sg : Subsemigroup R} (hg : ↑sg = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk' s sg hg sa ha : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_mk' NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk' {s : Set R} {sg : Subsemigroup R} (hg : ↑sg = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) {x : R} : x ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk' s sg hg sa ha ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_mk' NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toSubsemigroup {s : Set R} {sg : Subsemigroup R} (hg : ↑sg = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk' s sg hg sa ha).toSubsemigroup = sg :=
SetLike.coe_injective hg.symm
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mk'_to_subsemigroup NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk'_toSubsemigroup
@[simp]
theorem mk'_toAddSubmonoid {s : Set R} {sg : Subsemigroup R} (hg : ↑sg = s) {sa : AddSubmonoid R}
(ha : ↑sa = s) : (NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk' s sg hg sa ha).toAddSubmonoid = sa :=
SetLike.coe_injective ha.symm
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mk'_to_add_submonoid NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk'_toAddSubmonoid
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
variable {F G : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
[FunLike G S T] [NonUnitalRingHomClass G S T]
(s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : s) : R) = (0 : R) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_zero NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : s) : ((x + y : s) : R) = (x + y : R) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_add NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : s) : ((x * y : s) : R) = (x * y : R) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_mul NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_mul
/-! Note: currently, there are no ordered versions of non-unital rings. -/
@[simp high]
theorem mem_toSubsemigroup {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toSubsemigroup ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_to_subsemigroup NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_toSubsemigroup
@[simp high]
theorem coe_toSubsemigroup (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : (s.toSubsemigroup : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_to_subsemigroup NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_toSubsemigroup
@[simp]
theorem mem_toAddSubmonoid {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ s.toAddSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_to_add_submonoid NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAddSubmonoid (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : (s.toAddSubmonoid : Set R) = s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_to_add_submonoid NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_toAddSubmonoid
/-- The non-unital subsemiring `R` of the non-unital semiring `R`. -/
instance : Top (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Subsemigroup R), (⊤ : AddSubmonoid R) with }⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : R) : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_top NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : Set R) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_top NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_top
/-- The ring equiv between the top element of `NonUnitalSubsemiring R` and `R`. -/
@[simps!]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) ≃+* R :=
{ Subsemigroup.topEquiv, AddSubmonoid.topEquiv with }
/-- The preimage of a non-unital subsemiring along a non-unital ring homomorphism is a
non-unital subsemiring. -/
def comap (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.comap (f : MulHom R S), s.toAddSubmonoid.comap (f : R →+ S) with
carrier := f ⁻¹' s }
#align non_unital_subsemiring.comap NonUnitalSubsemiring.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) (f : F) : (s.comap f : Set R) = f ⁻¹' s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_comap NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring S} {f : F} {x : R} : x ∈ s.comap f ↔ f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_comap NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_comap
-- this has some nasty coercions, how to deal with it?
theorem comap_comap (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring T) (g : G) (f : F) :
((s.comap g : NonUnitalSubsemiring S).comap f : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) =
s.comap ((g : S →ₙ+* T).comp (f : R →ₙ+* S)) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.comap_comap NonUnitalSubsemiring.comap_comap
/-- The image of a non-unital subsemiring along a ring homomorphism is a non-unital subsemiring. -/
def map (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring S :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.map (f : R →ₙ* S), s.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : R →+ S) with carrier := f '' s }
#align non_unital_subsemiring.map NonUnitalSubsemiring.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : (s.map f : Set S) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_map NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {y : S} : y ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_map NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : s.map (NonUnitalRingHom.id R) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
#align non_unital_subsemiring.map_id NonUnitalSubsemiring.map_id
-- unavoidable coercions?
theorem map_map (g : G) (f : F) :
(s.map (f : R →ₙ+* S)).map (g : S →ₙ+* T) = s.map ((g : S →ₙ+* T).comp (f : R →ₙ+* S)) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
#align non_unital_subsemiring.map_map NonUnitalSubsemiring.map_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
#align non_unital_subsemiring.map_le_iff_le_comap NonUnitalSubsemiring.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) :
@GaloisConnection (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (NonUnitalSubsemiring S) _ _ (map f) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align non_unital_subsemiring.gc_map_comap NonUnitalSubsemiring.gc_map_comap
/-- A non-unital subsemiring is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective (f : R → S)) :
s ≃+* s.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f s hf with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (map_mul f _ _)
map_add' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (map_add f _ _) }
#align non_unital_subsemiring.equiv_map_of_injective NonUnitalSubsemiring.equivMapOfInjective
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : s) :
(equivMapOfInjective s f hf x : S) = f x :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace NonUnitalRingHom
open NonUnitalSubsemiring
variable {F G : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
variable [FunLike G S T] [NonUnitalRingHomClass G S T] (f : F) (g : G)
/-- The range of a non-unital ring homomorphism is a non-unital subsemiring.
See note [range copy pattern]. -/
def srange : NonUnitalSubsemiring S :=
((⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).map (f : R →ₙ+* S)).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align non_unital_ring_hom.srange NonUnitalRingHom.srange
@[simp]
theorem coe_srange : (srange f : Set S) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align non_unital_ring_hom.coe_srange NonUnitalRingHom.coe_srange
@[simp]
theorem mem_srange {f : F} {y : S} : y ∈ srange f ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_ring_hom.mem_srange NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange
theorem srange_eq_map : srange f = (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).map f := by
ext
simp
#align non_unital_ring_hom.srange_eq_map NonUnitalRingHom.srange_eq_map
theorem mem_srange_self (f : F) (x : R) : f x ∈ srange f :=
mem_srange.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align non_unital_ring_hom.mem_srange_self NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange_self
theorem map_srange (g : S →ₙ+* T) (f : R →ₙ+* S) : map g (srange f) = srange (g.comp f) := by
simpa only [srange_eq_map] using (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).map_map g f
#align non_unital_ring_hom.map_srange NonUnitalRingHom.map_srange
/-- The range of a morphism of non-unital semirings is finite if the domain is a finite. -/
instance finite_srange [Finite R] (f : F) : Finite (srange f : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :=
(Set.finite_range f).to_subtype
#align non_unital_ring_hom.finite_srange NonUnitalRingHom.finite_srange
end NonUnitalRingHom
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
-- should we define this as the range of the zero homomorphism?
instance : Bot (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
⟨{ carrier := {0}
add_mem' := fun _ _ => by simp_all
zero_mem' := Set.mem_singleton 0
mul_mem' := fun _ _ => by simp_all }⟩
instance : Inhabited (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
⟨⊥⟩
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : Set R) = {0} :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_bot NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_bot
theorem mem_bot {x : R} : x ∈ (⊥ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) ↔ x = 0 :=
Set.mem_singleton_iff
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_bot NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_bot
/-- The inf of two non-unital subsemirings is their intersection. -/
instance : Inf (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
⟨fun s t =>
{ s.toSubsemigroup ⊓ t.toSubsemigroup, s.toAddSubmonoid ⊓ t.toAddSubmonoid with
carrier := s ∩ t }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
((p ⊓ p' : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : Set R) = (p : Set R) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_inf NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {x : R} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_inf NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_inf
instance : InfSet (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
⟨fun s =>
NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk' (⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t) (⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup t)
(by simp) (⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t) (by simp)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)) :
((sInf S : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : Set R) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_Inf NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_sInf
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)} {x : R} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_Inf NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubsemigroup (s : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toSubsemigroup = ⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup t :=
mk'_toSubsemigroup _ _
#align non_unital_subsemiring.Inf_to_subsemigroup NonUnitalSubsemiring.sInf_toSubsemigroup
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toAddSubmonoid (s : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toAddSubmonoid = ⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t :=
mk'_toAddSubmonoid _ _
#align non_unital_subsemiring.Inf_to_add_submonoid NonUnitalSubsemiring.sInf_toAddSubmonoid
/-- Non-unital subsemirings of a non-unital semiring form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)
fun _ => IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun s _ hx => (mem_bot.mp hx).symm ▸ zero_mem s
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _ _ => trivial
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩ }
theorem eq_top_iff' (A : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : A = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : R, x ∈ A :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align non_unital_subsemiring.eq_top_iff' NonUnitalSubsemiring.eq_top_iff'
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable (R) [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R]
/-- The center of a semiring `R` is the set of elements that commute and associate with everything
in `R` -/
def center : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ Subsemigroup.center R with
zero_mem' := Set.zero_mem_center R
add_mem' := Set.add_mem_center }
#align non_unital_subsemiring.center NonUnitalSubsemiring.center
theorem coe_center : ↑(center R) = Set.center R :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_center NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_center
@[simp]
theorem center_toSubsemigroup :
(center R).toSubsemigroup = Subsemigroup.center R :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.center_to_subsemigroup NonUnitalSubsemiring.center_toSubsemigroup
/-- The center is commutative and associative. -/
instance center.instNonUnitalCommSemiring : NonUnitalCommSemiring (center R) :=
{ Subsemigroup.center.commSemigroup,
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (center R) with }
/-- A point-free means of proving membership in the center, for a non-associative ring.
This can be helpful when working with types that have ext lemmas for `R →+ R`. -/
lemma _root_.Set.mem_center_iff_addMonoidHom (a : R) :
a ∈ Set.center R ↔
AddMonoidHom.mulLeft a = .mulRight a ∧
AddMonoidHom.compr₂ .mul (.mulLeft a) = .comp .mul (.mulLeft a) ∧
AddMonoidHom.comp .mul (.mulRight a) = .compl₂ .mul (.mulLeft a) ∧
AddMonoidHom.compr₂ .mul (.mulRight a) = .compl₂ .mul (.mulRight a) := by
rw [Set.mem_center_iff, isMulCentral_iff]
simp [DFunLike.ext_iff]
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalSemiring
-- no instance diamond, unlike the unital version
example {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] :
(center.instNonUnitalCommSemiring _).toNonUnitalSemiring =
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalSemiring (center R) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem mem_center_iff {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] {z : R} : z ∈ center R ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := by
rw [← Semigroup.mem_center_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_center_iff NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_center_iff
instance decidableMemCenter {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ center R) := fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
#align non_unital_subsemiring.decidable_mem_center NonUnitalSubsemiring.decidableMemCenter
@[simp]
theorem center_eq_top (R) [NonUnitalCommSemiring R] : center R = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.center_eq_univ R)
#align non_unital_subsemiring.center_eq_top NonUnitalSubsemiring.center_eq_top
end NonUnitalSemiring
section Centralizer
/-- The centralizer of a set as non-unital subsemiring. -/
def centralizer {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s : Set R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ Subsemigroup.centralizer s with
carrier := s.centralizer
zero_mem' := Set.zero_mem_centralizer _
add_mem' := Set.add_mem_centralizer }
#align non_unital_subsemiring.centralizer NonUnitalSubsemiring.centralizer
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_centralizer {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s : Set R) = s.centralizer :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.coe_centralizer NonUnitalSubsemiring.coe_centralizer
theorem centralizer_toSubsemigroup {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s).toSubsemigroup = Subsemigroup.centralizer s :=
rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.centralizer_to_subsemigroup NonUnitalSubsemiring.centralizer_toSubsemigroup
theorem mem_centralizer_iff {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] {s : Set R} {z : R} :
z ∈ centralizer s ↔ ∀ g ∈ s, g * z = z * g :=
Iff.rfl
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_centralizer_iff NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_centralizer_iff
theorem center_le_centralizer {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s) : center R ≤ centralizer s :=
s.center_subset_centralizer
#align non_unital_subsemiring.center_le_centralizer NonUnitalSubsemiring.center_le_centralizer
theorem centralizer_le {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s t : Set R) (h : s ⊆ t) :
centralizer t ≤ centralizer s :=
Set.centralizer_subset h
#align non_unital_subsemiring.centralizer_le NonUnitalSubsemiring.centralizer_le
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] {s : Set R} :
centralizer s = ⊤ ↔ s ⊆ center R :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
#align non_unital_subsemiring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset NonUnitalSubsemiring.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_univ {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] : centralizer Set.univ = center R :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.centralizer_univ R)
#align non_unital_subsemiring.centralizer_univ NonUnitalSubsemiring.centralizer_univ
end Centralizer
/-- The `NonUnitalSubsemiring` generated by a set. -/
def closure (s : Set R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
sInf { S | s ⊆ S }
#align non_unital_subsemiring.closure NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure
theorem mem_closure {x : R} {s : Set R} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : NonUnitalSubsemiring R, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_closure NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_closure
/-- The non-unital subsemiring generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_closure {s : Set R} : s ⊆ closure s := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hS => hS hx
#align non_unital_subsemiring.subset_closure NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : Set R} {P : R} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align non_unital_subsemiring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure NonUnitalSubsemiring.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
/-- A non-unital subsemiring `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_le {s : Set R} {t : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} : closure s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Set.Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align non_unital_subsemiring.closure_le NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_le
/-- Subsemiring closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set R⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Set.Subset.trans h subset_closure
#align non_unital_subsemiring.closure_mono NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_mono
theorem closure_eq_of_le {s : Set R} {t : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} (h₁ : s ⊆ t)
(h₂ : t ≤ closure s) : closure s = t :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
#align non_unital_subsemiring.closure_eq_of_le NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_eq_of_le
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : R ≃+* S} {K : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {x : S} :
x ∈ K.map (f : R →ₙ+* S) ↔ f.symm x ∈ K := by
convert @Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (↑K) f.toEquiv x
#align non_unital_subsemiring.mem_map_equiv NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_map_equiv
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
K.map (f : R →ₙ+* S) = K.comap f.symm :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
#align non_unital_subsemiring.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm NonUnitalSubsemiring.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :
K.comap (f : R →ₙ+* S) = K.map f.symm :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
#align non_unital_subsemiring.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm NonUnitalSubsemiring.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace Subsemigroup
/-- The additive closure of a non-unital subsemigroup is a non-unital subsemiring. -/
def nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure (M : Subsemigroup R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) with mul_mem' := MulMemClass.mul_mem_add_closure }
#align subsemigroup.non_unital_subsemiring_closure Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure
theorem nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_coe :
(M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.non_unital_subsemiring_closure_coe Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_coe
theorem nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid :
M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure.toAddSubmonoid = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.non_unital_subsemiring_closure_to_add_submonoid Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid
/-- The `NonUnitalSubsemiring` generated by a multiplicative subsemigroup coincides with the
`NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure` of the subsemigroup itself . -/
theorem nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_eq_closure :
M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure = NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure (M : Set R) := by
ext
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_,
fun hx => (NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_closure.mp hx) M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure fun s sM => ?_⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H1, rfl⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H2, rfl⟩
· exact AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp hx H1.toAddSubmonoid H2
· exact H2 sM
#align subsemigroup.non_unital_subsemiring_closure_eq_closure Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_eq_closure
end Subsemigroup
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
@[simp]
theorem closure_subsemigroup_closure (s : Set R) : closure ↑(Subsemigroup.closure s) = closure s :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le.mpr fun _ hy =>
(Subsemigroup.mem_closure.mp hy) (closure s).toSubsemigroup subset_closure)
(closure_mono Subsemigroup.subset_closure)
#align non_unital_subsemiring.closure_subsemigroup_closure NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_subsemigroup_closure
/-- The elements of the non-unital subsemiring closure of `M` are exactly the elements of the
additive closure of a multiplicative subsemigroup `M`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/NonUnitalSubsemiring/Basic.lean | 682 | 685 | theorem coe_closure_eq (s : Set R) :
(closure s : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (Subsemigroup.closure s : Set R) := by |
simp [← Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid,
Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_eq_closure]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Holder
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.MetricSeparated
#align_import measure_theory.measure.hausdorff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d5c4a7a5fb0d982f97ed953161264f1dbd90ead"
/-!
# Hausdorff measure and metric (outer) measures
In this file we define the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure on an (extended) metric space `X` and
the Hausdorff dimension of a set in an (extended) metric space. Let `μ d δ` be the maximal outer
measure such that `μ d δ s ≤ (EMetric.diam s) ^ d` for every set of diameter less than `δ`. Then
the Hausdorff measure `μH[d] s` of `s` is defined as `⨆ δ > 0, μ d δ s`. By Caratheodory theorem
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`, this is a Borel measure on `X`.
The value of `μH[d]`, `d > 0`, on a set `s` (measurable or not) is given by
```
μH[d] s = ⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : 0 < r), ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n)
(ht : ∀ n, EMetric.diam (t n) ≤ r), ∑' n, EMetric.diam (t n) ^ d
```
For every set `s` for any `d < d'` we have either `μH[d] s = ∞` or `μH[d'] s = 0`, see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top`. In
`Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDimension` we use this fact to define the Hausdorff dimension
`dimH` of a set in an (extended) metric space.
We also define two generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. In one generalization (see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`) we take any function `m (diam s)` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. In
an even more general definition (see `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'`) we use any function
of `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`. Some authors start with a partial function `m` defined only on some sets
`s : Set X` (e.g., only on balls or only on measurable sets). This is equivalent to our definition
applied to `MeasureTheory.extend m`.
We also define a predicate `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric` which says that an outer measure
is additive on metric separated pairs of sets: `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` provided that
`⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), edist x y ≠ 0`. This is the property required for the Caratheodory theorem
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`, so we prove this theorem for any
metric outer measure, then prove that outer measures constructed using `mkMetric'` are metric outer
measures.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric`: an outer measure `μ` is called *metric* if
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` for any two metric separated sets `s` and `t`. A metric outer measure in a
Borel extended metric space is guaranteed to satisfy the Caratheodory condition, see
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`.
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` and its particular case
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric`: a construction of an outer measure that is guaranteed to
be metric. Both constructions are generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. The same measures
interpreted as Borel measures are called `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'` and
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure` a.k.a. `μH[d]`: the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure.
There are many definitions of the Hausdorff measure that differ from each other by a
multiplicative constant. We put
`μH[d] s = ⨆ r > 0, ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (ht : ∀ n, EMetric.diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ (ht : ¬Set.Subsingleton (t n)), (EMetric.diam (t n)) ^ d`,
see `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_apply`. In the most interesting case `0 < d` one
can omit the `⨆ (ht : ¬Set.Subsingleton (t n))` part.
## Main statements
### Basic properties
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`: if `μ` is a metric outer measure
on an extended metric space `X` (that is, it is additive on pairs of metric separated sets), then
every Borel set is Caratheodory measurable (hence, `μ` defines an actual
`MeasureTheory.Measure`). See also `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_mono`: `μH[d] s` is an antitone function
of `d`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top`: if `d₁ < d₂`, then for any `s`, either
`μH[d₂] s = 0` or `μH[d₁] s = ∞`. Together with the previous lemma, this means that `μH[d] s` is
equal to infinity on some ray `(-∞, D)` and is equal to zero on `(D, +∞)`, where `D` is a possibly
infinite number called the *Hausdorff dimension* of `s`; `μH[D] s` can be zero, infinity, or
anything in between.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.noAtoms_hausdorff`: Hausdorff measure has no atoms.
### Hausdorff measure in `ℝⁿ`
* `MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_pi_real`: for a nonempty `ι`, `μH[card ι]` on `ι → ℝ` equals
Lebesgue measure.
## Notations
We use the following notation localized in `MeasureTheory`.
- `μH[d]` : `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d`
## Implementation notes
There are a few similar constructions called the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure. E.g., some
sources only allow coverings by balls and use `r ^ d` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. While these
construction lead to different Hausdorff measures, they lead to the same notion of the Hausdorff
dimension.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.10][Federer1996]
## Tags
Hausdorff measure, measure, metric measure
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open EMetric Set Function Filter Encodable FiniteDimensional TopologicalSpace
noncomputable section
variable {ι X Y : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] [EMetricSpace Y]
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
/-!
### Metric outer measures
In this section we define metric outer measures and prove Caratheodory theorem: a metric outer
measure has the Caratheodory property.
-/
/-- We say that an outer measure `μ` in an (e)metric space is *metric* if `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`
for any two metric separated sets `s`, `t`. -/
def IsMetric (μ : OuterMeasure X) : Prop :=
∀ s t : Set X, IsMetricSeparated s t → μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric
namespace IsMetric
variable {μ : OuterMeasure X}
/-- A metric outer measure is additive on a finite set of pairwise metric separated sets. -/
theorem finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated (hm : IsMetric μ) {I : Finset ι} {s : ι → Set X}
(hI : ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ j ∈ I, i ≠ j → IsMetricSeparated (s i) (s j)) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) = ∑ i ∈ I, μ (s i) := by
classical
induction' I using Finset.induction_on with i I hiI ihI hI
· simp
simp only [Finset.mem_insert] at hI
rw [Finset.set_biUnion_insert, hm, ihI, Finset.sum_insert hiI]
exacts [fun i hi j hj hij => hI i (Or.inr hi) j (Or.inr hj) hij,
IsMetricSeparated.finset_iUnion_right fun j hj =>
hI i (Or.inl rfl) j (Or.inr hj) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hiI).symm]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.finset_Union_of_pairwise_separated MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated
/-- Caratheodory theorem. If `m` is a metric outer measure, then every Borel measurable set `t` is
Caratheodory measurable: for any (not necessarily measurable) set `s` we have
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s`. -/
theorem borel_le_caratheodory (hm : IsMetric μ) : borel X ≤ μ.caratheodory := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_isClosed]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => μ.isCaratheodory_iff_le.2 fun s => ?_
set S : ℕ → Set X := fun n => {x ∈ s | (↑n)⁻¹ ≤ infEdist x t}
have Ssep (n) : IsMetricSeparated (S n) t :=
⟨n⁻¹, ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _),
fun x hx y hy ↦ hx.2.trans <| infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy⟩
have Ssep' : ∀ n, IsMetricSeparated (S n) (s ∩ t) := fun n =>
(Ssep n).mono Subset.rfl inter_subset_right
have S_sub : ∀ n, S n ⊆ s \ t := fun n =>
subset_inter inter_subset_left (Ssep n).subset_compl_right
have hSs : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s := fun n =>
calc
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) = μ (s ∩ t ∪ S n) := Eq.symm <| hm _ _ <| (Ssep' n).symm
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t ∪ s \ t) := μ.mono <| union_subset_union_right _ <| S_sub n
_ = μ s := by rw [inter_union_diff]
have iUnion_S : ⋃ n, S n = s \ t := by
refine Subset.antisymm (iUnion_subset S_sub) ?_
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht] at hxt
rcases ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt hxt with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, hxs, hn.le⟩
/- Now we have `∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s` and we need to prove
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ s`. We can't pass to the limit because
`μ` is only an outer measure. -/
by_cases htop : μ (s \ t) = ∞
· rw [htop, add_top, ← htop]
exact μ.mono diff_subset
suffices μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ ⨆ n, μ (S n) by calc
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) := by rw [iUnion_S]
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + ⨆ n, μ (S n) := by gcongr
_ = ⨆ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) := ENNReal.add_iSup
_ ≤ μ s := iSup_le hSs
/- It suffices to show that `∑' k, μ (S (k + 1) \ S k) ≠ ∞`. Indeed, if we have this,
then for all `N` we have `μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ (S N) + ∑' k, m (S (N + k + 1) \ S (N + k))`
and the second term tends to zero, see `OuterMeasure.iUnion_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top`
for details. -/
have : ∀ n, S n ⊆ S (n + 1) := fun n x hx =>
⟨hx.1, le_trans (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.2 <| Nat.cast_le.2 n.le_succ) hx.2⟩
classical -- Porting note: Added this to get the next tactic to work
refine (μ.iUnion_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top this ?_).le; clear this
/- While the sets `S (k + 1) \ S k` are not pairwise metric separated, the sets in each
subsequence `S (2 * k + 1) \ S (2 * k)` and `S (2 * k + 2) \ S (2 * k)` are metric separated,
so `m` is additive on each of those sequences. -/
rw [← tsum_even_add_odd ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable, ENNReal.add_ne_top]
suffices ∀ a, (∑' k : ℕ, μ (S (2 * k + 1 + a) \ S (2 * k + a))) ≠ ∞ from
⟨by simpa using this 0, by simpa using this 1⟩
refine fun r => ne_top_of_le_ne_top htop ?_
rw [← iUnion_S, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, iSup_le_iff]
intro n
rw [← hm.finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated]
· exact μ.mono (iUnion_subset fun i => iUnion_subset fun _ x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨_, hx.1⟩)
suffices ∀ i j, i < j → IsMetricSeparated (S (2 * i + 1 + r)) (s \ S (2 * j + r)) from
fun i _ j _ hij => hij.lt_or_lt.elim
(fun h => (this i j h).mono inter_subset_left fun x hx => by exact ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩)
fun h => (this j i h).symm.mono (fun x hx => by exact ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩) inter_subset_left
intro i j hj
have A : ((↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) < (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ := by
rw [ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, Nat.cast_lt]; omega
refine ⟨(↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ - (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹, by simpa [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le] using A,
fun x hx y hy => ?_⟩
have : infEdist y t < (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹ := not_le.1 fun hle => hy.2 ⟨hy.1, hle⟩
rcases infEdist_lt_iff.mp this with ⟨z, hzt, hyz⟩
have hxz : (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ ≤ edist x z := le_infEdist.1 hx.2 _ hzt
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right hyz.ne_top
refine le_trans ?_ (edist_triangle _ _ _)
refine (add_le_add le_rfl hyz.le).trans (Eq.trans_le ?_ hxz)
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le A.le]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.borel_le_caratheodory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory
theorem le_caratheodory [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (hm : IsMetric μ) :
‹MeasurableSpace X› ≤ μ.caratheodory := by
rw [BorelSpace.measurable_eq (α := X)]
exact hm.borel_le_caratheodory
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.le_caratheodory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.le_caratheodory
end IsMetric
/-!
### Constructors of metric outer measures
In this section we provide constructors `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` and
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric` and prove that these outer measures are metric outer
measures. We also prove basic lemmas about `map`/`comap` of these measures.
-/
/-- Auxiliary definition for `OuterMeasure.mkMetric'`: given a function on sets
`m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, returns the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s`
for any set `s` of diameter at most `r`. -/
def mkMetric'.pre (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
boundedBy <| extend fun s (_ : diam s ≤ r) => m s
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.pre MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.pre
/-- Given a function `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, `mkMetric' m` is the supremum of `mkMetric'.pre m r`
over `r > 0`. Equivalently, it is the limit of `mkMetric'.pre m r` as `r` tends to zero from
the right. -/
def mkMetric' (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
⨆ r > 0, mkMetric'.pre m r
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric' MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'
/-- Given a function `m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞` and `r > 0`, let `μ r` be the maximal outer measure such that
`μ s ≤ m (EMetric.diam s)` whenever `EMetric.diam s < r`. Then `mkMetric m = ⨆ r > 0, μ r`. -/
def mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
mkMetric' fun s => m (diam s)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric
namespace mkMetric'
variable {m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞} {r : ℝ≥0∞} {μ : OuterMeasure X} {s : Set X}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Hausdorff.lean | 270 | 271 | theorem le_pre : μ ≤ pre m r ↔ ∀ s : Set X, diam s ≤ r → μ s ≤ m s := by |
simp only [pre, le_boundedBy, extend, le_iInf_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.RBMap.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
/-!
# Lemmas for Red-black trees
The main theorem in this file is `WF_def`, which shows that the `RBNode.WF.mk` constructor
subsumes the others, by showing that `insert` and `erase` satisfy the red-black invariants.
-/
namespace Batteries
namespace RBNode
open RBColor
attribute [simp] All
theorem All.trivial (H : ∀ {x : α}, p x) : ∀ {t : RBNode α}, t.All p
| nil => _root_.trivial
| node .. => ⟨H, All.trivial H, All.trivial H⟩
theorem All_and {t : RBNode α} : t.All (fun a => p a ∧ q a) ↔ t.All p ∧ t.All q := by
induction t <;> simp [*, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
protected theorem cmpLT.flip (h₁ : cmpLT cmp x y) : cmpLT (flip cmp) y x :=
⟨have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp))); h₁.1⟩
theorem cmpLT.trans (h₁ : cmpLT cmp x y) (h₂ : cmpLT cmp y z) : cmpLT cmp x z :=
⟨TransCmp.lt_trans h₁.1 h₂.1⟩
theorem cmpLT.trans_l {cmp x y} (H : cmpLT cmp x y) {t : RBNode α}
(h : t.All (cmpLT cmp y ·)) : t.All (cmpLT cmp x ·) := h.imp fun h => H.trans h
theorem cmpLT.trans_r {cmp x y} (H : cmpLT cmp x y) {a : RBNode α}
(h : a.All (cmpLT cmp · x)) : a.All (cmpLT cmp · y) := h.imp fun h => h.trans H
theorem cmpEq.lt_congr_left (H : cmpEq cmp x y) : cmpLT cmp x z ↔ cmpLT cmp y z :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨TransCmp.cmp_congr_left H.1 ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨TransCmp.cmp_congr_left H.1 ▸ h⟩⟩
theorem cmpEq.lt_congr_right (H : cmpEq cmp y z) : cmpLT cmp x y ↔ cmpLT cmp x z :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨TransCmp.cmp_congr_right H.1 ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨TransCmp.cmp_congr_right H.1 ▸ h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.reverse = t := by
induction t <;> simp [*]
theorem reverse_eq_iff {t t' : RBNode α} : t.reverse = t' ↔ t = t'.reverse := by
constructor <;> rintro rfl <;> simp
@[simp] theorem reverse_balance1 (l : RBNode α) (v : α) (r : RBNode α) :
(balance1 l v r).reverse = balance2 r.reverse v l.reverse := by
unfold balance1 balance2; split <;> simp
· rw [balance2.match_1.eq_2]; simp [reverse_eq_iff]; intros; solve_by_elim
· rw [balance2.match_1.eq_3] <;> (simp [reverse_eq_iff]; intros; solve_by_elim)
@[simp] theorem reverse_balance2 (l : RBNode α) (v : α) (r : RBNode α) :
(balance2 l v r).reverse = balance1 r.reverse v l.reverse := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (reverse_reverse _); rw [reverse_balance1]; simp
@[simp] theorem All.reverse {t : RBNode α} : t.reverse.All p ↔ t.All p := by
induction t <;> simp [*, and_comm]
/-- The `reverse` function reverses the ordering invariants. -/
protected theorem Ordered.reverse : ∀ {t : RBNode α}, t.Ordered cmp → t.reverse.Ordered (flip cmp)
| .nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| .node .., ⟨lv, vr, hl, hr⟩ =>
⟨(All.reverse.2 vr).imp cmpLT.flip, (All.reverse.2 lv).imp cmpLT.flip, hr.reverse, hl.reverse⟩
protected theorem Balanced.reverse {t : RBNode α} : t.Balanced c n → t.reverse.Balanced c n
| .nil => .nil
| .black hl hr => .black hr.reverse hl.reverse
| .red hl hr => .red hr.reverse hl.reverse
/-- The `balance1` function preserves the ordering invariants. -/
protected theorem Ordered.balance1 {l : RBNode α} {v : α} {r : RBNode α}
(lv : l.All (cmpLT cmp · v)) (vr : r.All (cmpLT cmp v ·))
(hl : l.Ordered cmp) (hr : r.Ordered cmp) : (balance1 l v r).Ordered cmp := by
unfold balance1; split
· next a x b y c =>
have ⟨yv, _, cv⟩ := lv; have ⟨xy, yc, hx, hc⟩ := hl
exact ⟨xy, ⟨yv, yc, yv.trans_l vr⟩, hx, cv, vr, hc, hr⟩
· next a x b y c _ =>
have ⟨_, _, yv, _, cv⟩ := lv; have ⟨ax, ⟨xy, xb, _⟩, ha, by_, yc, hb, hc⟩ := hl
exact ⟨⟨xy, xy.trans_r ax, by_⟩, ⟨yv, yc, yv.trans_l vr⟩, ⟨ax, xb, ha, hb⟩, cv, vr, hc, hr⟩
· exact ⟨lv, vr, hl, hr⟩
@[simp] theorem balance1_All {l : RBNode α} {v : α} {r : RBNode α} :
(balance1 l v r).All p ↔ p v ∧ l.All p ∧ r.All p := by
unfold balance1; split <;> simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
/-- The `balance2` function preserves the ordering invariants. -/
protected theorem Ordered.balance2 {l : RBNode α} {v : α} {r : RBNode α}
(lv : l.All (cmpLT cmp · v)) (vr : r.All (cmpLT cmp v ·))
(hl : l.Ordered cmp) (hr : r.Ordered cmp) : (balance2 l v r).Ordered cmp := by
rw [← reverse_reverse (balance2 ..), reverse_balance2]
exact .reverse <| hr.reverse.balance1
((All.reverse.2 vr).imp cmpLT.flip) ((All.reverse.2 lv).imp cmpLT.flip) hl.reverse
@[simp] theorem balance2_All {l : RBNode α} {v : α} {r : RBNode α} :
(balance2 l v r).All p ↔ p v ∧ l.All p ∧ r.All p := by
unfold balance2; split <;> simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem reverse_setBlack {t : RBNode α} : (setBlack t).reverse = setBlack t.reverse := by
unfold setBlack; split <;> simp
protected theorem Ordered.setBlack {t : RBNode α} : (setBlack t).Ordered cmp ↔ t.Ordered cmp := by
unfold setBlack; split <;> simp [Ordered]
protected theorem Balanced.setBlack : t.Balanced c n → ∃ n', (setBlack t).Balanced black n'
| .nil => ⟨_, .nil⟩
| .black hl hr | .red hl hr => ⟨_, hl.black hr⟩
theorem setBlack_idem {t : RBNode α} : t.setBlack.setBlack = t.setBlack := by cases t <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_ins [inst : @OrientedCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
(ins cmp x t).reverse = ins (flip cmp) x t.reverse := by
induction t <;> [skip; (rename_i c a y b iha ihb; cases c)] <;> simp [ins, flip]
<;> rw [← inst.symm x y] <;> split <;> simp [*, Ordering.swap, iha, ihb]
protected theorem All.ins {x : α} {t : RBNode α}
(h₁ : p x) (h₂ : t.All p) : (ins cmp x t).All p := by
induction t <;> unfold ins <;> try simp [*]
split <;> cases ‹_=_› <;> split <;> simp at h₂ <;> simp [*]
/-- The `ins` function preserves the ordering invariants. -/
protected theorem Ordered.ins : ∀ {t : RBNode α}, t.Ordered cmp → (ins cmp x t).Ordered cmp
| nil, _ => ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
| node red a y b, ⟨ay, yb, ha, hb⟩ => by
unfold ins; split
· next h => exact ⟨ay.ins ⟨h⟩, yb, ha.ins, hb⟩
· next h => exact ⟨ay, yb.ins ⟨OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h⟩, ha, hb.ins⟩
· next h => exact (⟨
ay.imp fun ⟨h'⟩ => ⟨(TransCmp.cmp_congr_right h).trans h'⟩,
yb.imp fun ⟨h'⟩ => ⟨(TransCmp.cmp_congr_left h).trans h'⟩, ha, hb⟩)
| node black a y b, ⟨ay, yb, ha, hb⟩ => by
unfold ins; split
· next h => exact ha.ins.balance1 (ay.ins ⟨h⟩) yb hb
· next h => exact ha.balance2 ay (yb.ins ⟨OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h⟩) hb.ins
· next h => exact (⟨
ay.imp fun ⟨h'⟩ => ⟨(TransCmp.cmp_congr_right h).trans h'⟩,
yb.imp fun ⟨h'⟩ => ⟨(TransCmp.cmp_congr_left h).trans h'⟩, ha, hb⟩)
@[simp] theorem isRed_reverse {t : RBNode α} : t.reverse.isRed = t.isRed := by
cases t <;> simp [isRed]
@[simp] theorem reverse_insert [inst : @OrientedCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
(insert cmp t x).reverse = insert (flip cmp) t.reverse x := by
simp [insert] <;> split <;> simp
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/RBMap/WF.lean | 154 | 156 | theorem insert_setBlack {t : RBNode α} :
(t.insert cmp v).setBlack = (t.ins cmp v).setBlack := by |
unfold insert; split <;> simp [setBlack_idem]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_neg
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.oangle_neg_self_left
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.oangle_neg_self_right
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, add_left_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_self]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_same_ray_neg Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, _root_.abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq Orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
convert Complex.arg_real_mul _ (_ : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2) using 2
· norm_cast
· have : 0 < ‖y‖ := by simpa using hy
positivity
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
#align orientation.oangle_add Orientation.oangle_add
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_swap Orientation.oangle_add_swap
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left Orientation.oangle_sub_left
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right Orientation.oangle_sub_right
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3 Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq Orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
#align orientation.oangle_map Orientation.oangle_map
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by simp [oangle]
#align complex.oangle Complex.oangle
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align orientation.oangle_map_complex Orientation.oangle_map_complex
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg
/-- The inner product of two vectors is the product of the norms and the cosine of the oriented
angle between the vectors. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle (x y : V) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hx
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
rw [oangle, Real.Angle.cos_coe, Complex.cos_arg, o.abs_kahler]
· simp only [kahler_apply_apply, real_smul, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, ofReal_im]
field_simp
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle Orientation.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the inner product divided by
the product of the norms. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
rw [o.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle]
field_simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx, norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm Orientation.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors equals that of the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = Real.cos (InnerProductGeometry.angle x y) := by
rw [o.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm hx hy, InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle Orientation.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is plus or minus the unoriented angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y ∨
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y :=
Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.1 <| o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle Orientation.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle
/-- The unoriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the absolute value of the oriented angle,
converted to a real. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 658 | 666 | theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = |(o.oangle x y).toReal| := by |
have h0 := InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg x y
have hpi := InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi x y
rcases o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy with (h | h)
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Markus Himmel, Bhavik Mehta, Andrew Yang, Emily Riehl
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.WidePullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7316286ff2942aa14e540add9058c6b0aa1c8070"
/-!
# Pullbacks
We define a category `WalkingCospan` (resp. `WalkingSpan`), which is the index category
for the given data for a pullback (resp. pushout) diagram. Convenience methods `cospan f g`
and `span f g` construct functors from the walking (co)span, hitting the given morphisms.
We define `pullback f g` and `pushout f g` as limits and colimits of such functors.
## References
* [Stacks: Fibre products](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001U)
* [Stacks: Pushouts](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0025)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
universe w v₁ v₂ v u u₂
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy, no local
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a pullback, defined as a special case of
`WidePullbackShape`. -/
abbrev WalkingCospan : Type :=
WidePullbackShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
/-- The left point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.left : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.left
/-- The right point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.right : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.right
/-- The central point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.one : WalkingCospan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.one CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.one
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a pushout, defined as a special case of
`WidePushoutShape`.
-/
abbrev WalkingSpan : Type :=
WidePushoutShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan
/-- The left point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.left : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.left
/-- The right point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.right : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.right
/-- The central point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.zero : WalkingSpan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.zero CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.zero
namespace WalkingCospan
/-- The type of arrows for the diagram indexing a pullback. -/
abbrev Hom : WalkingCospan → WalkingCospan → Type :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom
/-- The left arrow of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.inl : left ⟶ one :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.term _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
/-- The right arrow of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.inr : right ⟶ one :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.term _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.inr
/-- The identity arrows of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.id (X : WalkingCospan) : X ⟶ X :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.id X
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.id CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.id
instance (X Y : WalkingCospan) : Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y) := by
constructor; intros; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end WalkingCospan
namespace WalkingSpan
/-- The type of arrows for the diagram indexing a pushout. -/
abbrev Hom : WalkingSpan → WalkingSpan → Type :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom
/-- The left arrow of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.fst : zero ⟶ left :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.init _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
/-- The right arrow of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.snd : zero ⟶ right :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.init _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.snd
/-- The identity arrows of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.id (X : WalkingSpan) : X ⟶ X :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.id X
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.id CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.id
instance (X Y : WalkingSpan) : Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y) := by
constructor; intros a b; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end WalkingSpan
open WalkingSpan.Hom WalkingCospan.Hom WidePullbackShape.Hom WidePushoutShape.Hom
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- To construct an isomorphism of cones over the walking cospan,
it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cone points and check it commutes with the legs to `left` and `right`. -/
def WalkingCospan.ext {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} {s t : Cone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.left = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.right = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₁
have h₂ := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₂
simp_rw [h₂, ← Category.assoc, ← w₁, ← h₁]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.ext
/-- To construct an isomorphism of cocones over the walking span,
it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cocone points and check it commutes with the legs from `left` and `right`. -/
def WalkingSpan.ext {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} {s t : Cocone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.left ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.right ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cocones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₁
have h₂ := t.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₂
simp_rw [← h₁, Category.assoc, w₁, h₂]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.ext
/-- `cospan f g` is the functor from the walking cospan hitting `f` and `g`. -/
def cospan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : WalkingCospan ⥤ C :=
WidePullbackShape.wideCospan Z (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan
/-- `span f g` is the functor from the walking span hitting `f` and `g`. -/
def span {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : WalkingSpan ⥤ C :=
WidePushoutShape.wideSpan X (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j Y Z) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.span CategoryTheory.Limits.span
@[simp]
theorem cospan_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_left
@[simp]
theorem span_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.left = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_left CategoryTheory.Limits.span_left
@[simp]
theorem cospan_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.right = Y := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_right
@[simp]
theorem span_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.right = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_right CategoryTheory.Limits.span_right
@[simp]
theorem cospan_one {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.one = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_one
@[simp]
theorem span_zero {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.zero = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.span_zero
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inl {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inl = f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inl
@[simp]
theorem span_map_fst {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.fst = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_fst
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inr {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inr = g := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inr
@[simp]
theorem span_map_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.snd = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_snd
theorem cospan_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingCospan) :
(cospan f g).map (WalkingCospan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_id
theorem span_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingSpan) :
(span f g).map (WalkingSpan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_id
/-- Every diagram indexing a pullback is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `cospan` -/
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoCospan (F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C) : F ≅ cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoCospan
/-- Every diagram indexing a pushout is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `span` -/
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoSpan (F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C) : F ≅ span (F.map fst) (F.map snd) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_span CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoSpan
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- A functor applied to a cospan is a cospan. -/
def cospanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
cospan f g ⋙ F ≅ cospan (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.right = Iso.refl _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.one = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_one
end
/-- A functor applied to a span is a span. -/
def spanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
span f g ⋙ F ≅ span (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.right = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.zero = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_zero
end
section
variable {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (iX : X ≅ X') (iY : Y ≅ Y') (iZ : Z ≅ Z')
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Z'} {g' : Y' ⟶ Z'}
/-- Construct an isomorphism of cospans from components. -/
def cospanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
cospan f g ≅ cospan f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iZ, iX, iY])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_left : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.left = iX := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_right : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.right = iY := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.one = iZ := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_one
end
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} {g' : X' ⟶ Z'}
/-- Construct an isomorphism of spans from components. -/
def spanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
span f g ≅ span f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iX, iY, iZ])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.left = iY := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.right = iZ := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_one : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.zero = iX := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_zero
end
end
variable {W X Y Z : C}
/-- A pullback cone is just a cone on the cospan formed by two morphisms `f : X ⟶ Z` and
`g : Y ⟶ Z`. -/
abbrev PullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
Cone (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone
namespace PullbackCone
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
/-- The first projection of a pullback cone. -/
abbrev fst (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ X :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst
/-- The second projection of a pullback cone. -/
abbrev snd (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ Y :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd
@[simp]
theorem π_app_left (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.left = c.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem π_app_right (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.right = c.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem condition_one (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.π.app WalkingCospan.one = t.fst ≫ f := by
have w := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at w; simpa using w
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition_one
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a pullback cone is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : PullbackCone f g) (lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.snd = s.snd)
(uniq : ∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(_ : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, m ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => Option.casesOn j (by
rw [← s.w inl, ← t.w inl, ← Category.assoc]
congr
exact fac_left s)
fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' (fac_left s) (fac_right s)
uniq := uniq }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a pullback cone is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def isLimitAux' (t : PullbackCone f g)
(create :
∀ s : PullbackCone f g,
{ l //
l ≫ t.fst = s.fst ∧
l ≫ t.snd = s.snd ∧ ∀ {m}, m ≫ t.fst = s.fst → m ≫ t.snd = s.snd → m = l }) :
Limits.IsLimit t :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1)
(fun s => (create s).2.2.1) fun s _ w =>
(create s).2.2.2 (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
/-- A pullback cone on `f` and `g` is determined by morphisms `fst : W ⟶ X` and `snd : W ⟶ Y`
such that `fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) : PullbackCone f g where
pt := W
π := { app := fun j => Option.casesOn j (fst ≫ f) fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' fst snd
naturality := by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) j <;> cases j <;> dsimp <;> simp [eq] }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_left {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.left = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_right {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.right = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_one {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.one = fst ≫ f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_fst {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).fst = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem mk_snd {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).snd = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd
@[reassoc]
theorem condition (t : PullbackCone f g) : fst t ≫ f = snd t ≫ g :=
(t.w inl).trans (t.w inr).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition
/-- To check whether a morphism is equalized by the maps of a pullback cone, it suffices to check
it for `fst t` and `snd t` -/
theorem equalizer_ext (t : PullbackCone f g) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt} (h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t)
(h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, k ≫ t.π.app j = l ≫ t.π.app j
| some WalkingPair.left => h₀
| some WalkingPair.right => h₁
| none => by rw [← t.w inl, reassoc_of% h₀]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.equalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.equalizer_ext
theorem IsLimit.hom_ext {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt}
(h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t) (h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : k = l :=
ht.hom_ext <| equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext
theorem mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono f] :
Mono t.snd := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ i⟩
rw [← cancel_mono f, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ g) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono
theorem mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono g] :
Mono t.fst := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht i ?_⟩
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ f) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono
/-- To construct an isomorphism of pullback cones, it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cone points and check it commutes with `fst` and `snd`. -/
def ext {s t : PullbackCone f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w₁ : s.fst = i.hom ≫ t.fst)
(w₂ : s.snd = i.hom ≫ t.snd) : s ≅ t :=
WalkingCospan.ext i w₁ w₂
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ext
-- Porting note: `IsLimit.lift` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
/-- If `t` is a limit pullback cone over `f` and `g` and `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` are such that
`h ≫ f = k ≫ g`, then we get `l : W ⟶ t.pt`, which satisfies `l ≫ fst t = h`
and `l ≫ snd t = k`, see `IsLimit.lift_fst` and `IsLimit.lift_snd`. -/
def IsLimit.lift {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ t.pt :=
ht.lift <| PullbackCone.mk _ _ w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_fst {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ fst t = h := ht.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_snd {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ snd t = k := ht.fac _ _
/-- If `t` is a limit pullback cone over `f` and `g` and `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` are such that
`h ≫ f = k ≫ g`, then we have `l : W ⟶ t.pt` satisfying `l ≫ fst t = h` and `l ≫ snd t = k`.
-/
def IsLimit.lift' {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ t.pt // l ≫ fst t = h ∧ l ≫ snd t = k } :=
⟨IsLimit.lift ht h k w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift'
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `PullbackCone` constructed using
`PullbackCone.mk` is a limit cone.
-/
def IsLimit.mk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g)
(lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (mk fst snd eq) :=
isLimitAux _ lift fac_left fac_right fun s m w =>
uniq s m (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk
section Flip
variable (t : PullbackCone f g)
/-- The pullback cone obtained by flipping `fst` and `snd`. -/
def flip : PullbackCone g f := PullbackCone.mk _ _ t.condition.symm
@[simp] lemma flip_pt : t.flip.pt = t.pt := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_fst : t.flip.fst = t.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_snd : t.flip.snd = t.fst := rfl
/-- Flipping a pullback cone twice gives an isomorphic cone. -/
def flipFlipIso : t.flip.flip ≅ t := PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
variable {t}
/-- The flip of a pullback square is a pullback square. -/
def flipIsLimit (ht : IsLimit t) : IsLimit t.flip :=
IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => ht.lift s.flip) (by simp) (by simp) (fun s m h₁ h₂ => by
apply IsLimit.hom_ext ht
all_goals aesop_cat)
/-- A square is a pullback square if its flip is. -/
def isLimitOfFlip (ht : IsLimit t.flip) : IsLimit t :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (flipIsLimit ht) t.flipFlipIso
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.flip_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
end Flip
/--
The pullback cone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` for the pair `(f, f)` is a limit if `f` is a mono. The converse is
shown in `mono_of_pullback_is_id`.
-/
def isLimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : IsLimit (mk (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) rfl : PullbackCone f f) :=
IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => s.fst) (fun s => Category.comp_id _)
(fun s => by rw [← cancel_mono f, Category.comp_id, s.condition]) fun s m m₁ _ => by
simpa using m₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId
/--
`f` is a mono if the pullback cone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` is a limit for the pair `(f, f)`. The converse is
given in `PullbackCone.is_id_of_mono`.
-/
theorem mono_of_isLimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) (t : IsLimit (mk (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) rfl : PullbackCone f f)) :
Mono f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h eq => by
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' t _ _ eq with ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_of_is_limit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_of_isLimitMkIdId
/-- Suppose `f` and `g` are two morphisms with a common codomain and `s` is a limit cone over the
diagram formed by `f` and `g`. Suppose `f` and `g` both factor through a monomorphism `h` via
`x` and `y`, respectively. Then `s` is also a limit cone over the diagram formed by `x` and
`y`. -/
def isLimitOfFactors (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ Z) [Mono h] (x : X ⟶ W) (y : Y ⟶ W)
(hxh : x ≫ h = f) (hyh : y ≫ h = g) (s : PullbackCone f g) (hs : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show s.fst ≫ x = s.snd ≫ y from
(cancel_mono h).1 <| by simp only [Category.assoc, hxh, hyh, s.condition])) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun t =>
have : fst t ≫ x ≫ h = snd t ≫ y ≫ h := by -- Porting note: reassoc workaround
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc]
apply congrArg (· ≫ h) t.condition
⟨hs.lift (PullbackCone.mk t.fst t.snd <| by rw [← hxh, ← hyh, this]),
⟨hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.right, fun hr hr' => by
apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext hs <;>
simp only [PullbackCone.mk_fst, PullbackCone.mk_snd] at hr hr' ⊢ <;>
simp only [hr, hr'] <;>
symm
exacts [hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.right]⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_of_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfFactors
/-- If `W` is the pullback of `f, g`,
it is also the pullback of `f ≫ i, g ≫ i` for any mono `i`. -/
def isLimitOfCompMono (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) (i : W ⟶ Z) [Mono i] (s : PullbackCone f g)
(H : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show s.fst ≫ f ≫ i = s.snd ≫ g ≫ i by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc, s.condition])) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' H s.fst s.snd
((cancel_mono i).mp (by simpa using s.condition)) with
⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨l, h₁, h₂, ?_⟩
intro m hm₁ hm₂
exact (PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext H (hm₁.trans h₁.symm) (hm₂.trans h₂.symm) : _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_of_comp_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfCompMono
end PullbackCone
/-- A pushout cocone is just a cocone on the span formed by two morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` and
`g : X ⟶ Z`. -/
abbrev PushoutCocone (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :=
Cocone (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone
namespace PushoutCocone
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z}
/-- The first inclusion of a pushout cocone. -/
abbrev inl (t : PushoutCocone f g) : Y ⟶ t.pt :=
t.ι.app WalkingSpan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inl
/-- The second inclusion of a pushout cocone. -/
abbrev inr (t : PushoutCocone f g) : Z ⟶ t.pt :=
t.ι.app WalkingSpan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inr
@[simp]
theorem ι_app_left (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.ι.app WalkingSpan.left = c.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem ι_app_right (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.ι.app WalkingSpan.right = c.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ι_app_right
@[simp]
theorem condition_zero (t : PushoutCocone f g) : t.ι.app WalkingSpan.zero = f ≫ t.inl := by
have w := t.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at w; simpa using w.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.condition_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.condition_zero
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a pushout cocone is a colimit cocone.
It only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isColimitAux (t : PushoutCocone f g) (desc : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq : ∀ (s : PushoutCocone f g) (m : t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(_ : ∀ j : WalkingSpan, t.ι.app j ≫ m = s.ι.app j), m = desc s) : IsColimit t :=
{ desc
fac := fun s j =>
Option.casesOn j (by simp [← s.w fst, ← t.w fst, fac_left s]) fun j' =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j' (fac_left s) (fac_right s)
uniq := uniq }
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitAux
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a pushout cocone is a colimit cocone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def isColimitAux' (t : PushoutCocone f g)
(create :
∀ s : PushoutCocone f g,
{ l //
t.inl ≫ l = s.inl ∧
t.inr ≫ l = s.inr ∧ ∀ {m}, t.inl ≫ m = s.inl → t.inr ≫ m = s.inr → m = l }) :
IsColimit t :=
isColimitAux t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1) (fun s => (create s).2.2.1)
fun s _ w => (create s).2.2.2 (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_aux' CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
/-- A pushout cocone on `f` and `g` is determined by morphisms `inl : Y ⟶ W` and `inr : Z ⟶ W` such
that `f ≫ inl = g ↠ inr`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) : PushoutCocone f g where
pt := W
ι := { app := fun j => Option.casesOn j (f ≫ inl) fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' inl inr
naturality := by
rintro (⟨⟩|⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩|⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> intro f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> aesop }
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_left {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.left = inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_right {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.right = inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_zero {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.zero = f ≫ inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_inl {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).inl = inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_inl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inr {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).inr = inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_inr
@[reassoc]
theorem condition (t : PushoutCocone f g) : f ≫ inl t = g ≫ inr t :=
(t.w fst).trans (t.w snd).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.condition
/-- To check whether a morphism is coequalized by the maps of a pushout cocone, it suffices to check
it for `inl t` and `inr t` -/
theorem coequalizer_ext (t : PushoutCocone f g) {W : C} {k l : t.pt ⟶ W}
(h₀ : inl t ≫ k = inl t ≫ l) (h₁ : inr t ≫ k = inr t ≫ l) :
∀ j : WalkingSpan, t.ι.app j ≫ k = t.ι.app j ≫ l
| some WalkingPair.left => h₀
| some WalkingPair.right => h₁
| none => by rw [← t.w fst, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, h₀]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.coequalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.coequalizer_ext
theorem IsColimit.hom_ext {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} {k l : t.pt ⟶ W}
(h₀ : inl t ≫ k = inl t ≫ l) (h₁ : inr t ≫ k = inr t ≫ l) : k = l :=
ht.hom_ext <| coequalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext
-- Porting note: `IsColimit.desc` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
/-- If `t` is a colimit pushout cocone over `f` and `g` and `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` are
morphisms satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k`, then we have a factorization `l : t.pt ⟶ W` such that
`inl t ≫ l = h` and `inr t ≫ l = k`, see `IsColimit.inl_desc` and `IsColimit.inr_desc`-/
def IsColimit.desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : t.pt ⟶ W :=
ht.desc (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ w)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsColimit.inl_desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : inl t ≫ IsColimit.desc ht h k w = h :=
ht.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsColimit.inr_desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : inr t ≫ IsColimit.desc ht h k w = k :=
ht.fac _ _
/-- If `t` is a colimit pushout cocone over `f` and `g` and `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` are
morphisms satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k`, then we have a factorization `l : t.pt ⟶ W` such that
`inl t ≫ l = h` and `inr t ≫ l = k`. -/
def IsColimit.desc' {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : { l : t.pt ⟶ W // inl t ≫ l = h ∧ inr t ≫ l = k } :=
⟨IsColimit.desc ht h k w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc'
theorem epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) [Epi f] :
Epi t.inr :=
⟨fun {W} h k i => IsColimit.hom_ext ht (by simp [← cancel_epi f, t.condition_assoc, i]) i⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi
theorem epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) [Epi g] :
Epi t.inl :=
⟨fun {W} h k i => IsColimit.hom_ext ht i (by simp [← cancel_epi g, ← t.condition_assoc, i])⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi
/-- To construct an isomorphism of pushout cocones, it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cocone points and check it commutes with `inl` and `inr`. -/
def ext {s t : PushoutCocone f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w₁ : s.inl ≫ i.hom = t.inl)
(w₂ : s.inr ≫ i.hom = t.inr) : s ≅ t :=
WalkingSpan.ext i w₁ w₂
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ext
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `PushoutCocone` constructed using
`PushoutCocone.mk` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def IsColimit.mk {W : C} {inl : Y ⟶ W} {inr : Z ⟶ W} (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr)
(desc : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : PushoutCocone f g) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (mk inl inr eq) :=
isColimitAux _ desc fac_left fac_right fun s m w =>
uniq s m (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.mk
section Flip
variable (t : PushoutCocone f g)
/-- The pushout cocone obtained by flipping `inl` and `inr`. -/
def flip : PushoutCocone g f := PushoutCocone.mk _ _ t.condition.symm
@[simp] lemma flip_pt : t.flip.pt = t.pt := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_inl : t.flip.inl = t.inr := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_inr : t.flip.inr = t.inl := rfl
/-- Flipping a pushout cocone twice gives an isomorphic cocone. -/
def flipFlipIso : t.flip.flip ≅ t := PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
variable {t}
/-- The flip of a pushout square is a pushout square. -/
def flipIsColimit (ht : IsColimit t) : IsColimit t.flip :=
IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => ht.desc s.flip) (by simp) (by simp) (fun s m h₁ h₂ => by
apply IsColimit.hom_ext ht
all_goals aesop_cat)
/-- A square is a pushout square if its flip is. -/
def isColimitOfFlip (ht : IsColimit t.flip) : IsColimit t :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (flipIsColimit ht) t.flipFlipIso
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.flip_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
end Flip
/--
The pushout cocone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` for the pair `(f, f)` is a colimit if `f` is an epi. The converse is
shown in `epi_of_isColimit_mk_id_id`.
-/
def isColimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] : IsColimit (mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : PushoutCocone f f) :=
IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => s.inl) (fun s => Category.id_comp _)
(fun s => by rw [← cancel_epi f, Category.id_comp, s.condition]) fun s m m₁ _ => by
simpa using m₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId
/-- `f` is an epi if the pushout cocone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` is a colimit for the pair `(f, f)`.
The converse is given in `PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId`.
-/
theorem epi_of_isColimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y)
(t : IsColimit (mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : PushoutCocone f f)) : Epi f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h eq => by
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' t _ _ eq with ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_of_is_colimit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_of_isColimitMkIdId
/-- Suppose `f` and `g` are two morphisms with a common domain and `s` is a colimit cocone over the
diagram formed by `f` and `g`. Suppose `f` and `g` both factor through an epimorphism `h` via
`x` and `y`, respectively. Then `s` is also a colimit cocone over the diagram formed by `x` and
`y`. -/
def isColimitOfFactors (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : X ⟶ W) [Epi h] (x : W ⟶ Y) (y : W ⟶ Z)
(hhx : h ≫ x = f) (hhy : h ≫ y = g) (s : PushoutCocone f g) (hs : IsColimit s) :
have reassoc₁ : h ≫ x ≫ inl s = f ≫ inl s := by -- Porting note: working around reassoc
rw [← Category.assoc]; apply congrArg (· ≫ inl s) hhx
have reassoc₂ : h ≫ y ≫ inr s = g ≫ inr s := by
rw [← Category.assoc]; apply congrArg (· ≫ inr s) hhy
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ (show x ≫ s.inl = y ≫ s.inr from
(cancel_epi h).1 <| by rw [reassoc₁, reassoc₂, s.condition])) :=
PushoutCocone.isColimitAux' _ fun t => ⟨hs.desc (PushoutCocone.mk t.inl t.inr <| by
rw [← hhx, ← hhy, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, t.condition]),
⟨hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.right, fun hr hr' => by
apply PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext hs;
· simp only [PushoutCocone.mk_inl, PushoutCocone.mk_inr] at hr hr' ⊢
simp only [hr, hr']
symm
exact hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.left
· simp only [PushoutCocone.mk_inl, PushoutCocone.mk_inr] at hr hr' ⊢
simp only [hr, hr']
symm
exact hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.right⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_of_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFactors
/-- If `W` is the pushout of `f, g`,
it is also the pushout of `h ≫ f, h ≫ g` for any epi `h`. -/
def isColimitOfEpiComp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h] (s : PushoutCocone f g)
(H : IsColimit s) :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk _ _
(show (h ≫ f) ≫ s.inl = (h ≫ g) ≫ s.inr by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, s.condition])) := by
apply PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
intro s
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' H s.inl s.inr
((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using s.condition)) with
⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨l, h₁, h₂, ?_⟩
intro m hm₁ hm₂
exact (PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext H (hm₁.trans h₁.symm) (hm₂.trans h₂.symm) : _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_of_epi_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfEpiComp
end PushoutCocone
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
pullbacks. Given `F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr)`, and a pullback cone on `F.map inl` and `F.map inr`, we
get a cone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at `hasPullbacks_of_hasLimit_cospan`,
which you may find to be an easier way of achieving your goal. -/
@[simps]
def Cone.ofPullbackCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr)) :
Cone F where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).inv
#align category_theory.limits.cone.of_pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.ofPullbackCone
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
pushout. Given `F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`span (F.map fst) (F.map snd)`, and a pushout cocone on `F.map fst` and `F.map snd`,
we get a cocone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at `hasPushouts_of_hasColimit_span`, which
you may find to be an easier way of achieving your goal. -/
@[simps]
def Cocone.ofPushoutCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd)) :
Cocone F where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).hom ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.of_pushout_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.ofPushoutCocone
/-- Given `F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as `cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr)`,
and a cone on `F`, we get a pullback cone on `F.map inl` and `F.map inr`. -/
@[simps]
def PullbackCone.ofCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr) where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).hom
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ofCone
/-- A diagram `WalkingCospan ⥤ C` is isomorphic to some `PullbackCone.mk` after
composing with `diagramIsoCospan`. -/
@[simps!]
def PullbackCone.isoMk {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
(Cones.postcompose (diagramIsoCospan.{v} _).hom).obj t ≅
PullbackCone.mk (t.π.app WalkingCospan.left) (t.π.app WalkingCospan.right)
((t.π.naturality inl).symm.trans (t.π.naturality inr : _)) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isoMk
/-- Given `F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as `span (F.map fst) (F.map snd)`,
and a cocone on `F`, we get a pushout cocone on `F.map fst` and `F.map snd`. -/
@[simps]
def PushoutCocone.ofCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd) where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).inv ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ofCocone
/-- A diagram `WalkingSpan ⥤ C` is isomorphic to some `PushoutCocone.mk` after composing with
`diagramIsoSpan`. -/
@[simps!]
def PushoutCocone.isoMk {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
(Cocones.precompose (diagramIsoSpan.{v} _).inv).obj t ≅
PushoutCocone.mk (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.left) (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.right)
((t.ι.naturality fst).trans (t.ι.naturality snd).symm) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isoMk
/-- `HasPullback f g` represents a particular choice of limiting cone
for the pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Z` and `g : Y ⟶ Z`.
-/
abbrev HasPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
HasLimit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPullback
/-- `HasPushout f g` represents a particular choice of colimiting cocone
for the pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : X ⟶ Z`.
-/
abbrev HasPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasColimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPushout
/-- `pullback f g` computes the pullback of a pair of morphisms with the same target. -/
abbrev pullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :=
limit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback
/-- `pushout f g` computes the pushout of a pair of morphisms with the same source. -/
abbrev pushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :=
colimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout
/-- The first projection of the pullback of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pullback.fst {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ X :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst
/-- The second projection of the pullback of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pullback.snd {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd
/-- The first inclusion into the pushout of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pushout.inl {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Y ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl
/-- The second inclusion into the pushout of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pushout.inr {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Z ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` satisfying `h ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism
`pullback.lift : W ⟶ pullback f g`. -/
abbrev pullback.lift {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ pullback f g :=
limit.lift _ (PullbackCone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k` induces a morphism
`pushout.desc : pushout f g ⟶ W`. -/
abbrev pushout.desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout f g ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (PushoutCocone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.desc
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.fst (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.snd (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inl (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inl_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inr (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inr_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_fst {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.fst = h :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_snd {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.snd = k :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_snd
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inl_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inl ≫ pushout.desc h k w = h :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_desc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inr_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inr ≫ pushout.desc h k w = k :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_desc
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` satisfying `h ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism
`l : W ⟶ pullback f g` such that `l ≫ pullback.fst = h` and `l ≫ pullback.snd = k`. -/
def pullback.lift' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ pullback f g // l ≫ pullback.fst = h ∧ l ≫ pullback.snd = k } :=
⟨pullback.lift h k w, pullback.lift_fst _ _ _, pullback.lift_snd _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift'
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k` induces a morphism
`l : pushout f g ⟶ W` such that `pushout.inl ≫ l = h` and `pushout.inr ≫ l = k`. -/
def pullback.desc' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : { l : pushout f g ⟶ W // pushout.inl ≫ l = h ∧ pushout.inr ≫ l = k } :=
⟨pushout.desc h k w, pushout.inl_desc _ _ _, pushout.inr_desc _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.desc'
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] :
(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) ≫ f = pullback.snd ≫ g :=
PullbackCone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.condition
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] :
f ≫ (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) = g ≫ pushout.inr :=
PushoutCocone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.condition
/-- Given such a diagram, then there is a natural morphism `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z`.
W ⟶ Y
↘ ↘
S ⟶ T
↗ ↗
X ⟶ Z
-/
abbrev pullback.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂] (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ pullback g₁ g₂ :=
pullback.lift (pullback.fst ≫ i₁) (pullback.snd ≫ i₂)
(by simp [← eq₁, ← eq₂, pullback.condition_assoc])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map
/-- The canonical map `X ×ₛ Y ⟶ X ×ₜ Y` given `S ⟶ T`. -/
abbrev pullback.mapDesc {X Y S T : C} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] : pullback f g ⟶ pullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) :=
pullback.map f g (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.id_comp _).symm (Category.id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc
/-- Given such a diagram, then there is a natural morphism `W ⨿ₛ X ⟶ Y ⨿ₜ Z`.
W ⟶ Y
↗ ↗
S ⟶ T
↘ ↘
X ⟶ Z
-/
abbrev pushout.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂] (g₁ : T ⟶ Y)
(g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) : pushout f₁ f₂ ⟶ pushout g₁ g₂ :=
pushout.desc (i₁ ≫ pushout.inl) (i₂ ≫ pushout.inr)
(by
simp only [← Category.assoc, eq₁, eq₂]
simp [pushout.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map
/-- The canonical map `X ⨿ₛ Y ⟶ X ⨿ₜ Y` given `S ⟶ T`. -/
abbrev pushout.mapLift {X Y S T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] : pushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) ⟶ pushout f g :=
pushout.map (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) f g (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.mapLift
/-- Two morphisms into a pullback are equal if their compositions with the pullback morphisms are
equal -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem pullback.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] {W : C}
{k l : W ⟶ pullback f g} (h₀ : k ≫ pullback.fst = l ≫ pullback.fst)
(h₁ : k ≫ pullback.snd = l ≫ pullback.snd) : k = l :=
limit.hom_ext <| PullbackCone.equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.hom_ext
/-- The pullback cone built from the pullback projections is a pullback. -/
def pullbackIsPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) pullback.snd pullback.condition) :=
PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => pullback.lift s.fst s.snd s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsPullback
/-- The pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism -/
instance pullback.fst_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono g] :
Mono (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst_of_mono
/-- The pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism -/
instance pullback.snd_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono f] :
Mono (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd_of_mono
/-- The map `X ×[Z] Y ⟶ X × Y` is mono. -/
instance mono_pullback_to_prod {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasPullback f g] [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
Mono (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.fst) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.snd) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.mono_pullback_to_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.mono_pullback_to_prod
/-- Two morphisms out of a pushout are equal if their compositions with the pushout morphisms are
equal -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem pushout.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] {W : C}
{k l : pushout f g ⟶ W} (h₀ : pushout.inl ≫ k = pushout.inl ≫ l)
(h₁ : pushout.inr ≫ k = pushout.inr ≫ l) : k = l :=
colimit.hom_ext <| PushoutCocone.coequalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.hom_ext
/-- The pushout cocone built from the pushout coprojections is a pushout. -/
def pushoutIsPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f g) pushout.inr pushout.condition) :=
PushoutCocone.IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => pushout.desc s.inl s.inr s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsPushout
/-- The pushout of an epimorphism is an epimorphism -/
instance pushout.inl_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi g] :
Epi (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_of_epi
/-- The pushout of an epimorphism is an epimorphism -/
instance pushout.inr_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi f] :
Epi (pushout.inr : Z ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_of_epi
/-- The map `X ⨿ Y ⟶ X ⨿[Z] Y` is epi. -/
instance epi_coprod_to_pushout {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
[HasPushout f g] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] :
Epi (coprod.desc pushout.inl pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f g) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inl ≫ f) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inr ≫ f) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout
instance pullback.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pullback.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map_isIso
/-- If `f₁ = f₂` and `g₁ = g₂`, we may construct a canonical
isomorphism `pullback f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂` -/
@[simps! hom]
def pullback.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] : pullback f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pullback.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] :
(pullback.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pullback.lift_fst]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_fst_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
· erw [pullback.lift_snd]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_snd_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom_inv
instance pushout.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : T ⟶ Y) (g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pushout.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pushout.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map_isIso
theorem pullback.mapDesc_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (i : T ⟶ S) (i' : S ⟶ S')
[HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] [HasPullback (f ≫ i ≫ i') (g ≫ i ≫ i')]
[HasPullback ((f ≫ i) ≫ i') ((g ≫ i) ≫ i')] :
pullback.mapDesc f g (i ≫ i') = pullback.mapDesc f g i ≫ pullback.mapDesc _ _ i' ≫
(pullback.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc_comp
/-- If `f₁ = f₂` and `g₁ = g₂`, we may construct a canonical
isomorphism `pushout f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂` -/
@[simps! hom]
def pushout.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] : pushout f₁ g₁ ≅ pushout f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pushout.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] :
(pushout.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
· erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom_inv
theorem pushout.mapLift_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) (i' : S' ⟶ S)
[HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] [HasPushout (i' ≫ i ≫ f) (i' ≫ i ≫ g)]
[HasPushout ((i' ≫ i) ≫ f) ((i' ≫ i) ≫ g)] :
pushout.mapLift f g (i' ≫ i) =
(pushout.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom ≫
pushout.mapLift _ _ i' ≫ pushout.mapLift f g i := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_lift_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.mapLift_comp
section
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
/-- The comparison morphism for the pullback of `f,g`.
This is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves the pullback of `f,g`; see
`Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean`
-/
def pullbackComparison (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
G.obj (pullback f g) ⟶ pullback (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
pullback.lift (G.map pullback.fst) (G.map pullback.snd)
(by simp only [← G.map_comp, pullback.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackComparison_comp_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pullbackComparison G f g ≫ pullback.fst = G.map pullback.fst :=
pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison_comp_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison_comp_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackComparison_comp_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pullbackComparison G f g ≫ pullback.snd = G.map pullback.snd :=
pullback.lift_snd _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison_comp_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison_comp_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_lift_pullbackComparison (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] {W : C} {h : W ⟶ X} {k : W ⟶ Y} (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
G.map (pullback.lift _ _ w) ≫ pullbackComparison G f g =
pullback.lift (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) := by
ext <;> simp [← G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.map_lift_pullback_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.map_lift_pullbackComparison
/-- The comparison morphism for the pushout of `f,g`.
This is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves the pushout of `f,g`; see
`Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean`
-/
def pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pushout (G.map f) (G.map g) ⟶ G.obj (pushout f g) :=
pushout.desc (G.map pushout.inl) (G.map pushout.inr)
(by simp only [← G.map_comp, pushout.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_comp_pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] : pushout.inl ≫ pushoutComparison G f g = G.map pushout.inl :=
pushout.inl_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inl_comp_pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_comp_pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_comp_pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] : pushout.inr ≫ pushoutComparison G f g = G.map pushout.inr :=
pushout.inr_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inr_comp_pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_comp_pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pushoutComparison_map_desc (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] {W : C} {h : Y ⟶ W} {k : Z ⟶ W} (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) :
pushoutComparison G f g ≫ G.map (pushout.desc _ _ w) =
pushout.desc (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) := by
ext <;> simp [← G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_comparison_map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutComparison_map_desc
end
section PullbackSymmetry
open WalkingCospan
variable (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- Making this a global instance would make the typeclass search go in an infinite loop. -/
theorem hasPullback_symmetry [HasPullback f g] : HasPullback g f :=
⟨⟨⟨_, PullbackCone.flipIsLimit (pullbackIsPullback f g)⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_symmetry
attribute [local instance] hasPullback_symmetry
/-- The isomorphism `X ×[Z] Y ≅ Y ×[Z] X`. -/
def pullbackSymmetry [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ≅ pullback g f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso
(PullbackCone.flipIsLimit (pullbackIsPullback f g)) (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd := by simp [pullbackSymmetry]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_hom_comp_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).hom ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst := by simp [pullbackSymmetry]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_hom_comp_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_inv_comp_fst [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd := by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_inv_comp_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_inv_comp_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean | 1,568 | 1,569 | theorem pullbackSymmetry_inv_comp_snd [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst := by | simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Init.Control.Combinators
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Util.CompileInductive
import Aesop
#align_import data.option.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f340f229b1f461aa1c8ee11e0a172d0a3b301a4a"
/-!
# Option of a type
This file develops the basic theory of option types.
If `α` is a type, then `Option α` can be understood as the type with one more element than `α`.
`Option α` has terms `some a`, where `a : α`, and `none`, which is the added element.
This is useful in multiple ways:
* It is the prototype of addition of terms to a type. See for example `WithBot α` which uses
`none` as an element smaller than all others.
* It can be used to define failsafe partial functions, which return `some the_result_we_expect`
if we can find `the_result_we_expect`, and `none` if there is no meaningful result. This forces
any subsequent use of the partial function to explicitly deal with the exceptions that make it
return `none`.
* `Option` is a monad. We love monads.
`Part` is an alternative to `Option` that can be seen as the type of `True`/`False` values
along with a term `a : α` if the value is `True`.
-/
universe u
namespace Option
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
theorem coe_def : (fun a ↦ ↑a : α → Option α) = some :=
rfl
#align option.coe_def Option.coe_def
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {y : β} {o : Option α} : y ∈ o.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, f x = y := by simp
#align option.mem_map Option.mem_map
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Option.mem_def`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Function.Injective f) {a : α} {o : Option α} :
f a ∈ o.map f ↔ a ∈ o := by
aesop
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by simp
#align option.forall_mem_map Option.forall_mem_map
theorem exists_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by simp
#align option.exists_mem_map Option.exists_mem_map
theorem coe_get {o : Option α} (h : o.isSome) : ((Option.get _ h : α) : Option α) = o :=
Option.some_get h
#align option.coe_get Option.coe_get
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem {a : α} {o1 o2 : Option α} (h1 : a ∈ o1) (h2 : a ∈ o2) : o1 = o2 :=
h1.trans h2.symm
#align option.eq_of_mem_of_mem Option.eq_of_mem_of_mem
theorem Mem.leftUnique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Option α → Prop) :=
fun _ _ _=> mem_unique
#align option.mem.left_unique Option.Mem.leftUnique
theorem some_injective (α : Type*) : Function.Injective (@some α) := fun _ _ ↦ some_inj.mp
#align option.some_injective Option.some_injective
/-- `Option.map f` is injective if `f` is injective. -/
theorem map_injective {f : α → β} (Hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (Option.map f)
| none, none, _ => rfl
| some a₁, some a₂, H => by rw [Hf (Option.some.inj H)]
#align option.map_injective Option.map_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_some (f : α → β) : Option.map f ∘ some = some ∘ f :=
rfl
#align option.map_comp_some Option.map_comp_some
@[simp]
theorem none_bind' (f : α → Option β) : none.bind f = none :=
rfl
#align option.none_bind' Option.none_bind'
@[simp]
theorem some_bind' (a : α) (f : α → Option β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
rfl
#align option.some_bind' Option.some_bind'
theorem bind_eq_some' {x : Option α} {f : α → Option β} {b : β} :
x.bind f = some b ↔ ∃ a, x = some a ∧ f a = some b := by
cases x <;> simp
#align option.bind_eq_some' Option.bind_eq_some'
#align option.bind_eq_none' Option.bind_eq_none'
theorem bind_congr {f g : α → Option β} {x : Option α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ x, f a = g a) : x.bind f = x.bind g := by
cases x <;> simp only [some_bind, none_bind, mem_def, h]
@[congr]
theorem bind_congr' {f g : α → Option β} {x y : Option α} (hx : x = y)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ y, f a = g a) : x.bind f = y.bind g :=
hx.symm ▸ bind_congr hf
theorem joinM_eq_join : joinM = @join α :=
funext fun _ ↦ rfl
#align option.join_eq_join Option.joinM_eq_join
theorem bind_eq_bind' {α β : Type u} {f : α → Option β} {x : Option α} : x >>= f = x.bind f :=
rfl
#align option.bind_eq_bind Option.bind_eq_bind'
theorem map_coe {α β} {a : α} {f : α → β} : f <$> (a : Option α) = ↑(f a) :=
rfl
#align option.map_coe Option.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_coe' {a : α} {f : α → β} : Option.map f (a : Option α) = ↑(f a) :=
rfl
#align option.map_coe' Option.map_coe'
/-- `Option.map` as a function between functions is injective. -/
theorem map_injective' : Function.Injective (@Option.map α β) := fun f g h ↦
funext fun x ↦ some_injective _ <| by simp only [← map_some', h]
#align option.map_injective' Option.map_injective'
@[simp]
theorem map_inj {f g : α → β} : Option.map f = Option.map g ↔ f = g :=
map_injective'.eq_iff
#align option.map_inj Option.map_inj
attribute [simp] map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_id {f : α → α} : Option.map f = id ↔ f = id :=
map_injective'.eq_iff' map_id
#align option.map_eq_id Option.map_eq_id
theorem map_comm {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {g₁ : β → δ} {g₂ : γ → δ} (h : g₁ ∘ f₁ = g₂ ∘ f₂)
(a : α) :
(Option.map f₁ a).map g₁ = (Option.map f₂ a).map g₂ := by rw [map_map, h, ← map_map]
#align option.map_comm Option.map_comm
section pmap
variable {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a : α, p a → β) (x : Option α)
-- Porting note: Can't simp tag this anymore because `pbind` simplifies
-- @[simp]
theorem pbind_eq_bind (f : α → Option β) (x : Option α) : (x.pbind fun a _ ↦ f a) = x.bind f := by
cases x <;> simp only [pbind, none_bind', some_bind']
#align option.pbind_eq_bind Option.pbind_eq_bind
| Mathlib/Data/Option/Basic.lean | 166 | 168 | theorem map_bind {α β γ} (f : β → γ) (x : Option α) (g : α → Option β) :
Option.map f (x >>= g) = x >>= fun a ↦ Option.map f (g a) := by |
simp only [← map_eq_map, ← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Fin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.quotient_operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b88d81c84530450a8989e918608e5960f015e6c8"
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals related to quotients
## Main results:
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRange` : the **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings.
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRangeS` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism from a commutative ring to a semiring.
- `AlgHom.quotientKerEquivRange` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism of algebras (over a commutative semiring)
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRangeS` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism from a commutative ring to a semiring.
- `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient`: the **Chinese Remainder Theorem**, version for coprime
ideals (see also `ZMod.prodEquivPi` in `Data.ZMod.Quotient` for elementary versions about
`ZMod`).
-/
universe u v w
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`) /
is surjective (`quotientKerEquivOfSurjective`).
-/
def kerLift : R ⧸ ker f →+* S :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift _ f fun _ => f.mem_ker.mp
#align ring_hom.ker_lift RingHom.kerLift
@[simp]
theorem kerLift_mk (r : R) : kerLift f (Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) r) = f r :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
#align ring_hom.ker_lift_mk RingHom.kerLift_mk
theorem lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal (I : Ideal R) {f : R →+* S} (H : ∀ a : R, a ∈ I → f a = 0)
(hI : ker f ≤ I) : Function.Injective (Ideal.Quotient.lift I f H) := by
rw [RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot, RingHom.ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero]
intro u hu
obtain ⟨v, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective u
rw [Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk] at hu
rw [Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact hI ((RingHom.mem_ker f).mpr hu)
#align ring_hom.lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal RingHom.lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
theorem kerLift_injective : Function.Injective (kerLift f) :=
lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal (ker f) (fun a => by simp only [mem_ker, imp_self]) le_rfl
#align ring_hom.ker_lift_injective RingHom.kerLift_injective
variable {f}
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem for commutative rings**, computable version. -/
def quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f) :
R ⧸ ker f ≃+* S :=
{ kerLift f with
toFun := kerLift f
invFun := Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) ∘ g
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply kerLift_injective
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk, kerLift_mk,
Function.comp_apply, hf (f x)]
right_inv := hf }
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse
@[simp]
theorem quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.apply {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f)
(x : R ⧸ ker f) : quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hf x = kerLift f x :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.apply
@[simp]
theorem quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.Symm.apply {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f)
(x : S) : (quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hf).symm x = Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) (g x) :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.symm.apply RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.Symm.apply
variable (R) in
/-- The quotient of a ring by he zero ideal is isomorphic to the ring itself. -/
def _root_.RingEquiv.quotientBot : R ⧸ (⊥ : Ideal R) ≃+* R :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq (RingHom.ker_coe_equiv <| .refl _).symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (f := .id R) (g := _root_.id) fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings, surjective case. -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : R ⧸ (ker f) ≃+* S :=
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (Classical.choose_spec hf.hasRightInverse)
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings (`RingHom.rangeS` version). -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRangeS (f : R →+* S) : R ⧸ ker f ≃+* f.rangeS :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq f.ker_rangeSRestrict.symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f.rangeSRestrict_surjective
variable {S : Type v} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings (`RingHom.range` version). -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRange (f : R →+* S) : R ⧸ ker f ≃+* f.range :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq f.ker_rangeRestrict.symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective
end RingHom
namespace Ideal
open Function RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {F : Type w} [CommRing R] [Semiring S]
@[simp]
theorem map_quotient_self (I : Ideal R) : map (Quotient.mk I) I = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <|
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun _ hx =>
(Submodule.mem_bot (R ⧸ I)).2 <| Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 hx
#align ideal.map_quotient_self Ideal.map_quotient_self
@[simp]
theorem mk_ker {I : Ideal R} : ker (Quotient.mk I) = I := by
ext
rw [ker, mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
#align ideal.mk_ker Ideal.mk_ker
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/QuotientOperations.lean | 136 | 138 | theorem map_mk_eq_bot_of_le {I J : Ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) : I.map (Quotient.mk J) = ⊥ := by |
rw [map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker, mk_ker]
exact h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.SignedHahn
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
#align_import measure_theory.decomposition.jordan from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70a4f2197832bceab57d7f41379b2592d1110570"
/-!
# Jordan decomposition
This file proves the existence and uniqueness of the Jordan decomposition for signed measures.
The Jordan decomposition theorem states that, given a signed measure `s`, there exists a
unique pair of mutually singular measures `μ` and `ν`, such that `s = μ - ν`.
The Jordan decomposition theorem for measures is a corollary of the Hahn decomposition theorem and
is useful for the Lebesgue decomposition theorem.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition`: a Jordan decomposition of a measurable space is a
pair of mutually singular finite measures. We say `j` is a Jordan decomposition of a signed
measure `s` if `s = j.posPart - j.negPart`.
* `MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.toJordanDecomposition`: the Jordan decomposition of a
signed measure.
* `MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.toJordanDecompositionEquiv`: is the `Equiv` between
`MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure` and `MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition` formed by
`MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.toJordanDecomposition`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.toSignedMeasure_toJordanDecomposition` : the Jordan
decomposition theorem.
* `MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.toSignedMeasure_injective` : the Jordan decomposition of a
signed measure is unique.
## Tags
Jordan decomposition theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A Jordan decomposition of a measurable space is a pair of mutually singular,
finite measures. -/
@[ext]
structure JordanDecomposition (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] where
(posPart negPart : Measure α)
[posPart_finite : IsFiniteMeasure posPart]
[negPart_finite : IsFiniteMeasure negPart]
mutuallySingular : posPart ⟂ₘ negPart
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.pos_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.posPart
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.neg_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.negPart
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.pos_part_finite MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.posPart_finite
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.neg_part_finite MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.negPart_finite
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.mutually_singular MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.mutuallySingular
attribute [instance] JordanDecomposition.posPart_finite
attribute [instance] JordanDecomposition.negPart_finite
namespace JordanDecomposition
open Measure VectorMeasure
variable (j : JordanDecomposition α)
instance instZero : Zero (JordanDecomposition α) where zero := ⟨0, 0, MutuallySingular.zero_right⟩
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.has_zero MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.instZero
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (JordanDecomposition α) where default := 0
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.inhabited MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.instInhabited
instance instInvolutiveNeg : InvolutiveNeg (JordanDecomposition α) where
neg j := ⟨j.negPart, j.posPart, j.mutuallySingular.symm⟩
neg_neg _ := JordanDecomposition.ext _ _ rfl rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.has_involutive_neg MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.instInvolutiveNeg
instance instSMul : SMul ℝ≥0 (JordanDecomposition α) where
smul r j :=
⟨r • j.posPart, r • j.negPart,
MutuallySingular.smul _ (MutuallySingular.smul _ j.mutuallySingular.symm).symm⟩
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.has_smul MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.instSMul
instance instSMulReal : SMul ℝ (JordanDecomposition α) where
smul r j := if 0 ≤ r then r.toNNReal • j else -((-r).toNNReal • j)
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.has_smul_real MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.instSMulReal
@[simp]
theorem zero_posPart : (0 : JordanDecomposition α).posPart = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.zero_pos_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.zero_posPart
@[simp]
theorem zero_negPart : (0 : JordanDecomposition α).negPart = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.zero_neg_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.zero_negPart
@[simp]
theorem neg_posPart : (-j).posPart = j.negPart :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.neg_pos_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.neg_posPart
@[simp]
theorem neg_negPart : (-j).negPart = j.posPart :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.neg_neg_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.neg_negPart
@[simp]
theorem smul_posPart (r : ℝ≥0) : (r • j).posPart = r • j.posPart :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.smul_pos_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.smul_posPart
@[simp]
theorem smul_negPart (r : ℝ≥0) : (r • j).negPart = r • j.negPart :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.smul_neg_part MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.smul_negPart
theorem real_smul_def (r : ℝ) (j : JordanDecomposition α) :
r • j = if 0 ≤ r then r.toNNReal • j else -((-r).toNNReal • j) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.real_smul_def MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.real_smul_def
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ) • j = r • j := by
-- Porting note: replaced `show`
rw [real_smul_def, if_pos (NNReal.coe_nonneg r), Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.coe_smul MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.coe_smul
theorem real_smul_nonneg (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r • j = r.toNNReal • j :=
dif_pos hr
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.real_smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.real_smul_nonneg
theorem real_smul_neg (r : ℝ) (hr : r < 0) : r • j = -((-r).toNNReal • j) :=
dif_neg (not_le.2 hr)
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.real_smul_neg MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.real_smul_neg
theorem real_smul_posPart_nonneg (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
(r • j).posPart = r.toNNReal • j.posPart := by
rw [real_smul_def, ← smul_posPart, if_pos hr]
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.real_smul_pos_part_nonneg MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.real_smul_posPart_nonneg
theorem real_smul_negPart_nonneg (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
(r • j).negPart = r.toNNReal • j.negPart := by
rw [real_smul_def, ← smul_negPart, if_pos hr]
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.real_smul_neg_part_nonneg MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.real_smul_negPart_nonneg
theorem real_smul_posPart_neg (r : ℝ) (hr : r < 0) :
(r • j).posPart = (-r).toNNReal • j.negPart := by
rw [real_smul_def, ← smul_negPart, if_neg (not_le.2 hr), neg_posPart]
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.real_smul_pos_part_neg MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.real_smul_posPart_neg
theorem real_smul_negPart_neg (r : ℝ) (hr : r < 0) :
(r • j).negPart = (-r).toNNReal • j.posPart := by
rw [real_smul_def, ← smul_posPart, if_neg (not_le.2 hr), neg_negPart]
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.real_smul_neg_part_neg MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.real_smul_negPart_neg
/-- The signed measure associated with a Jordan decomposition. -/
def toSignedMeasure : SignedMeasure α :=
j.posPart.toSignedMeasure - j.negPart.toSignedMeasure
#align measure_theory.jordan_decomposition.to_signed_measure MeasureTheory.JordanDecomposition.toSignedMeasure
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Decomposition/Jordan.lean | 173 | 177 | theorem toSignedMeasure_zero : (0 : JordanDecomposition α).toSignedMeasure = 0 := by |
ext1 i hi
-- Porting note: replaced `erw` by adding further lemmas
rw [toSignedMeasure, toSignedMeasure_sub_apply hi, zero_posPart, zero_negPart, sub_self,
VectorMeasure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue
#align_import measure_theory.covering.differentiation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
/-!
# Differentiation of measures
On a second countable metric space with a measure `μ`, consider a Vitali family (i.e., for each `x`
one has a family of sets shrinking to `x`, with a good behavior with respect to covering theorems).
Consider also another measure `ρ`. Then, for almost every `x`, the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges when
`a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family, towards the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with
respect to `μ`. This is the main theorem on differentiation of measures.
This theorem is proved in this file, under the name `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`. Note that,
almost surely, `μ a` is eventually positive and finite (see
`VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos` and `VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top`), so the
ratio really makes sense.
For concrete applications, one needs concrete instances of Vitali families, as provided for instance
by `Besicovitch.vitaliFamily` (for balls) or by `Vitali.vitaliFamily` (for doubling measures).
Specific applications to Lebesgue density points and the Lebesgue differentiation theorem are also
derived:
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that, for almost every point `x ∈ s`,
then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` tends to `1` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_average_norm_sub` states that, for almost every point `x`, then the
average of `y ↦ ‖f y - f x‖` on `a` tends to `0` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
## Sketch of proof
Let `v` be a Vitali family for `μ`. Assume for simplicity that `ρ` is absolutely continuous with
respect to `μ`, as the case of a singular measure is easier.
It is easy to see that a set `s` on which `liminf ρ a / μ a < q` satisfies `ρ s ≤ q * μ s`, by using
a disjoint subcovering provided by the definition of Vitali families. Similarly for the limsup.
It follows that a set on which `ρ a / μ a` oscillates has measure `0`, and therefore that
`ρ a / μ a` converges almost surely (`VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_div`). Moreover, on a set where the
limit is close to a constant `c`, one gets `ρ s ∼ c μ s`, using again a covering lemma as above.
It follows that `ρ` is equal to `μ.withDensity (v.limRatio ρ x)`, where `v.limRatio ρ x` is the
limit of `ρ a / μ a` at `x` (which is well defined almost everywhere). By uniqueness of the
Radon-Nikodym derivative, one gets `v.limRatio ρ x = ρ.rnDeriv μ x` almost everywhere, completing
the proof.
There is a difficulty in this sketch: this argument works well when `v.limRatio ρ` is measurable,
but there is no guarantee that this is the case, especially if one doesn't make further assumptions
on the Vitali family. We use an indirect argument to show that `v.limRatio ρ` is always
almost everywhere measurable, again based on the disjoint subcovering argument
(see `VitaliFamily.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio`), and then proceed as sketched above
but replacing `v.limRatio ρ` by a measurable version called `v.limRatioMeas ρ`.
## Counterexample
The standing assumption in this file is that spaces are second countable. Without this assumption,
measures may be zero locally but nonzero globally, which is not compatible with differentiation
theory (which deduces global information from local one). Here is an example displaying this
behavior.
Define a measure `μ` by `μ s = 0` if `s` is covered by countably many balls of radius `1`,
and `μ s = ∞` otherwise. This is indeed a countably additive measure, which is moreover
locally finite and doubling at small scales. It vanishes on every ball of radius `1`, so all the
quantities in differentiation theory (defined as ratios of measures as the radius tends to zero)
make no sense. However, the measure is not globally zero if the space is big enough.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.9][Federer1996]
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
/-- The limit along a Vitali family of `ρ a / μ a` where it makes sense, and garbage otherwise.
Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary device to show that this ratio tends almost
everywhere to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
#align vitali_family.lim_ratio VitaliFamily.limRatio
/-- For almost every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have positive
measure. (This is a nontrivial result, following from the covering property of Vitali families). -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp (config := { zeta := false }) only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
#align vitali_family.ae_eventually_measure_pos VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos
/-- For every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have finite measure.
(This is a trivial result, following from the fact that the measure is locally finite). -/
theorem eventually_measure_lt_top [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, μ a < ∞ :=
(μ.finiteAt_nhds x).eventually.filter_mono inf_le_left
#align vitali_family.eventually_measure_lt_top VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top
/-- If two measures `ρ` and `ν` have, at every point of a set `s`, arbitrarily small sets in a
Vitali family satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`, then `ρ s ≤ ν s` if `ρ ≪ μ`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 125 | 149 | theorem measure_le_of_frequently_le [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] {ρ : Measure α}
(ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ν] (hρ : ρ ≪ μ) (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ ν a) : ρ s ≤ ν s := by |
-- this follows from a covering argument using the sets satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`.
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos _ => ?_
obtain ⟨U, sU, U_open, νU⟩ : ∃ (U : Set α), s ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ ν U ≤ ν s + ε :=
exists_isOpen_le_add s ν (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne'
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | ρ a ≤ ν a ∧ a ⊆ U}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
apply v.fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently f s fun x hx => ?_
have :=
(hs x hx).and_eventually
((v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x).and
(v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (U_open.mem_nhds (sU hx))))
apply Frequently.mono this
rintro a ⟨ρa, _, aU⟩
exact ⟨ρa, aU⟩
haveI : Encodable h.index := h.index_countable.toEncodable
calc
ρ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ρ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous hρ
_ ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ν (h.covering x) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => (h.covering_mem x.2).1
_ = ν (⋃ x : h.index, h.covering x) := by
rw [measure_iUnion h.covering_disjoint_subtype fun i => h.measurableSet_u i.2]
_ ≤ ν U := (measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun i => (h.covering_mem i.2).2))
_ ≤ ν s + ε := νU
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.NormalClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.SeparableDegree
/-!
# Separable degree
This file contains basics about the separable degree of a field extension.
## Main definitions
- `Field.Emb F E`: the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`
(the algebraic closure of `F` is usually used in the literature, but our definition has the
advantage that `Field.Emb F E` lies in the same universe as `E` rather than the maximum over `F`
and `E`). Usually denoted by $\operatorname{Emb}_F(E)$ in textbooks.
**Remark:** if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense,
and if it is infinite, then its cardinality doesn't behave as expected (namely, not equal to the
field extension degree of `separableClosure F E / F`). For example, if $F = \mathbb{Q}$ and
$E = \mathbb{Q}( \mu_{p^\infty} )$, then $\operatorname{Emb}_F (E)$ is in bijection with
$\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$, which is isomorphic to
$\mathbb{Z}_p^\times$, which is uncountable, while $[E:F]$ is countable.
**TODO:** prove or disprove that if `E / F` is algebraic and `Emb F E` is infinite, then
`Field.Emb F E` has cardinality `2 ^ Module.rank F (separableClosure F E)`.
- `Field.finSepDegree F E`: the (finite) separable degree $[E:F]_s$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic
closure of `E`, as a natural number. It is zero if `Field.Emb F E` is not finite.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense.
**Remark:** the `Cardinal`-valued, potentially infinite separable degree `Field.sepDegree F E`
for a general algebraic extension `E / F` is defined to be the degree of `L / F`, where `L` is
the (relative) separable closure `separableClosure F E` of `F` in `E`, which is not defined in
this file yet. Later we will show that (`Field.finSepDegree_eq`), if `Field.Emb F E` is finite,
then these two definitions coincide.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
## Main results
- `Field.embEquivOfEquiv`, `Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv`:
a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. In particular, they have the same cardinality (so their
`Field.finSepDegree` are equal).
- `Field.embEquivOfAdjoinSplits`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F`
and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embEquivOfIsAlgClosed`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed.
In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic`, `Field.finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic`:
if `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection `Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`.
In particular, the separable degrees satisfy the tower law: $[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$
(see also `FiniteDimensional.finrank_mul_finrank`).
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_le_natDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than
its degree.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff`: the separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is
equal to its degree if and only if it is separable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_splits`: if a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree
is equal to the number of distinct roots of it over `E`.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: the separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_expand`: if a field `F` is of exponential characteristic
`q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f` and `f` have the same separable degree.
- `Polynomial.HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq`: if a polynomial has separable
contraction, then its separable degree is equal to its separable contraction degree.
- `Irreducible.natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree`: the separable degree of an irreducible
polynomial divides its degree.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree`: the separable degree of
`F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the separable degree of the minimal polynomial of `α` over `F`.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff`: if `α` is algebraic over `F`, then
the separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if and only if `α` is a
separable element.
- `Field.finSepDegree_dvd_finrank`: the separable degree of any field extension `E / F` divides
the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_le_finrank`: the separable degree of a finite extension `E / F` is smaller
than the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_eq_finrank_iff`: if `E / F` is a finite extension, then its separable degree
is equal to its degree if and only if it is a separable extension.
- `IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_simple_iff_separable`: `F⟮x⟯ / F` is a separable extension
if and only if `x` is a separable element.
- `IsSeparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both separable, then `K / F` is also separable.
## Tags
separable degree, degree, polynomial
-/
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable (F : Type u) (E : Type v) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
variable (K : Type w) [Field K] [Algebra F K]
namespace Field
/-- `Field.Emb F E` is the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure
of `E`. -/
def Emb := E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure E
/-- If `E / F` is an algebraic extension, then the (finite) separable degree of `E / F`
is the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`,
as a natural number. It is defined to be zero if there are infinitely many of them.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense. -/
def finSepDegree : ℕ := Nat.card (Emb F E)
instance instInhabitedEmb : Inhabited (Emb F E) := ⟨IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E _⟩
instance instNeZeroFinSepDegree [FiniteDimensional F E] : NeZero (finSepDegree F E) :=
⟨Nat.card_ne_zero.2 ⟨inferInstance, Fintype.finite <| minpoly.AlgHom.fintype _ _ _⟩⟩
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. -/
def embEquivOfEquiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
Emb F E ≃ Emb F K := AlgEquiv.arrowCongr i <| AlgEquiv.symm <| by
let _ : Algebra E K := i.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K := by
constructor
intro x
have h := isAlgebraic_algebraMap (R := E) (A := K) (i.symm.toAlgHom x)
rw [show ∀ y : E, (algebraMap E K) y = i.toAlgHom y from fun y ↦ rfl] at h
simpa only [AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using h
apply AlgEquiv.restrictScalars (R := F) (S := E)
exact IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K) (AlgebraicClosure E)
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same `Field.finSepDegree`
over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
finSepDegree F E = finSepDegree F K := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfEquiv F E K i)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_self : finSepDegree F F = 1 := by
have : Cardinal.mk (Emb F F) = 1 := le_antisymm
(Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton.2 AlgHom.subsingleton)
(Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _)
rw [finSepDegree, Nat.card, this, Cardinal.one_toNat]
end Field
namespace IntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = 1 := by
rw [finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ (botEquiv F E), finSepDegree_self]
section Tower
variable {F}
variable [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot' : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F E :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((botEquiv E K).restrictScalars F)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_top : finSepDegree F (⊤ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F K :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((topEquiv (F := E) (E := K)).restrictScalars F)
end Tower
end IntermediateField
namespace Field
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every
element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`.
Combined with `Field.instInhabitedEmb`, it can be viewed as a stronger version of
`IntermediateField.nonempty_algHom_of_adjoin_splits`. -/
def embEquivOfAdjoinSplits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
(hS ▸ isAlgebraic_adjoin (S := S) fun x hx ↦ (hK x hx).1)
have halg := (topEquiv (F := F) (E := E)).isAlgebraic
Classical.choice <| Function.Embedding.antisymm
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ splits_of_mem_adjoin F (S := S) hK (hS ▸ mem_top)) _)
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) _)
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K`
if `E = F(S)` such that every element
`s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K hS hK)
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic
and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
def embEquivOfIsAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K (adjoin_univ F E) fun s _ ↦
⟨Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral s, IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _⟩
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K` as a natural number,
when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfIsAlgClosed F E K)
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection
`Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`. A corollary of `algHomEquivSigma`. -/
def embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
Emb F E × Emb E K ≃ Emb F K :=
let e : ∀ f : E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure K,
@AlgHom E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra ≃ Emb E K := fun f ↦
(@embEquivOfIsAlgClosed E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra).symm
(algHomEquivSigma (A := F) (B := E) (C := K) (D := AlgebraicClosure K) |>.trans
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProdOfEquiv e) |>.trans <| Equiv.prodCongrLeft <|
fun _ : Emb E K ↦ AlgEquiv.arrowCongr (@AlgEquiv.refl F E _ _ _) <|
(IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K)
(AlgebraicClosure E)).restrictScalars F).symm
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic, then their
separable degrees satisfy the tower law
$[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$. See also `FiniteDimensional.finrank_mul_finrank`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic
[Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
finSepDegree F E * finSepDegree E K = finSepDegree F K := by
simpa only [Nat.card_prod] using Nat.card_congr (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F E K)
end Field
namespace Polynomial
variable {F E}
variable (f : F[X])
/-- The separable degree `Polynomial.natSepDegree` of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
This is similar to `Polynomial.natDegree` but not to `Polynomial.degree`, namely, the separable
degree of `0` is `0`, not negative infinity. -/
def natSepDegree : ℕ := (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset.card
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_le_natDegree : f.natSepDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
have := f.map (algebraMap F f.SplittingField) |>.card_roots'
rw [← aroots_def, natDegree_map] at this
exact (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset_card_le.trans this
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C (x : F) : (X - C x).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X_sub_C, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X : (X : F[X]).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
/-- A constant polynomial has zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero (h : f.natDegree = 0) : f.natSepDegree = 0 := by
linarith only [natSepDegree_le_natDegree f, h]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C (x : F) : (C x).natSepDegree = 0 := natSepDegree_eq_zero _ (natDegree_C _)
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_zero : (0 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, natSepDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_one : (1 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_1, natSepDegree_C]
/-- A non-constant polynomial has non-zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero (h : f.natDegree ≠ 0) : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 := by
rw [natSepDegree, ne_eq, Finset.card_eq_zero, ← ne_eq, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
use rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
exact ⟨ne_of_apply_ne _ h, map_rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)⟩
/-- A polynomial has zero separable degree if and only if it is constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree = 0 ↔ f.natDegree = 0 :=
⟨(natSepDegree_ne_zero f).mtr, natSepDegree_eq_zero f⟩
/-- A polynomial has non-zero separable degree if and only if it is non-constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 ↔ f.natDegree ≠ 0 :=
Iff.not <| natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff f
/-- The separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is equal to its degree if and only if
it is separable. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff (hf : f ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree ↔ f.Separable := by
simp_rw [← card_rootSet_eq_natDegree_iff_of_splits hf (SplittingField.splits f),
rootSet_def, Finset.coe_sort_coe, Fintype.card_coe]
rfl
/-- If a polynomial is separable, then its separable degree is equal to its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := (natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff f h.ne_zero).2 h
variable {f} in
/-- Same as `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable`, but enables the use of
dot notation. -/
theorem Separable.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable f h
/-- If a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over `E`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_splits (h : f.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card := by
rw [aroots, ← (SplittingField.lift f h).comp_algebraMap, ← map_map,
roots_map _ ((splits_id_iff_splits _).mpr <| SplittingField.splits f),
Multiset.toFinset_map, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ (RingHom.injective _), natSepDegree]
variable (E) in
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [IsAlgClosed E] :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card :=
natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f (IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain f)
variable (E) in
theorem natSepDegree_map : (f.map (algebraMap F E)).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure E), aroots_def, map_map,
← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_C_mul _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_smul_nonzero {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(x • f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_smul_nonzero _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_pow {n : ℕ} : (f ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else f.natSepDegree := by
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_pow]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simp only [h, zero_smul, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.card_empty, ite_true]
simp only [h, Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ n h, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(f ^ n).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by simp_rw [natSepDegree_pow, hn, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n : F[X]).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow {x : F} {n : ℕ} :
((X - C x) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul_X_sub_C_pow {x y : F} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * (X - C y) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_C_mul _ hx, natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow]
theorem natSepDegree_mul (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree ≤ f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· simp only [h, natSepDegree_zero, zero_le]
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add]
exact Finset.card_union_le _ _
theorem natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree ↔ (f = 0 ∧ g = 0) ∨ IsCoprime f g := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· rw [mul_eq_zero] at h
wlog hf : f = 0 generalizing f g
· simpa only [mul_comm, add_comm, and_comm,
isCoprime_comm] using this g f h.symm (h.resolve_left hf)
rw [hf, zero_mul, natSepDegree_zero, zero_add, isCoprime_zero_left, isUnit_iff, eq_comm,
natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff, natDegree_eq_zero]
refine ⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0
· exact .inl ⟨rfl, by rw [← h, hx, map_zero]⟩
exact .inr ⟨x, Ne.isUnit hx, h⟩
rintro (⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨x, -, h⟩)
· exact ⟨0, by rw [h, map_zero]⟩
exact ⟨x, h⟩
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add,
Finset.card_union_eq_card_add_card, Finset.disjoint_iff_ne, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
refine ⟨fun H ↦ .inr (isCoprime_of_irreducible_dvd (not_and.2 fun _ ↦ h.2)
fun u hu ⟨v, hf⟩ ⟨w, hg⟩ ↦ ?_), ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsAlgClosed.exists_aeval_eq_zero
(AlgebraicClosure F) _ (degree_pos_of_irreducible hu).ne'
exact H x ⟨h.1, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hf)⟩
x ⟨h.2, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hg)⟩ rfl
rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | hc)
· exact (h.1 rfl).elim
rintro x hf _ hg rfl
obtain ⟨u, v, hfg⟩ := hc
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, map_one, hf.2, hg.2, mul_zero, add_zero,
zero_ne_one] using congr(aeval x $hfg)
theorem natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime (g : F[X]) (hc : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree :=
(natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff f g).2 (.inr hc)
theorem natSepDegree_le_of_dvd (g : F[X]) (h1 : f ∣ g) (h2 : g ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree ≤ g.natSepDegree := by
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F)]
exact Finset.card_le_card <| Multiset.toFinset_subset.mpr <|
Multiset.Le.subset <| roots.le_of_dvd (map_ne_zero h2) <| map_dvd _ h1
/-- If a field `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f`
and `f` have the same separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_expand (q : ℕ) [hF : ExpChar F q] {n : ℕ} :
(expand F (q ^ n) f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
cases' hF with _ _ hprime _
· simp only [one_pow, expand_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime
simpa only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_def, map_expand,
Fintype.card_coe] using Fintype.card_eq.2
⟨(f.map (algebraMap F (AlgebraicClosure F))).rootsExpandPowEquivRoots q n⟩
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (n : ℕ) (y : F) :
(X ^ q ^ n - C y).natSepDegree = 1 := by
rw [← expand_X, ← expand_C (q ^ n), ← map_sub, natSepDegree_expand, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
variable {f} in
/-- If `g` is a separable contraction of `f`, then the separable degree of `f` is equal to
the degree of `g`. -/
theorem IsSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq {g : Polynomial F} {q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q]
(h : IsSeparableContraction q f g) : f.natSepDegree = g.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨h1, m, h2⟩ := h
rw [← h2, natSepDegree_expand, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree]
variable {f} in
/-- If a polynomial has separable contraction, then its separable degree is equal to the degree of
the given separable contraction. -/
theorem HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
{q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q] (hf : f.HasSeparableContraction q) :
f.natSepDegree = hf.degree := hf.isSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
end Polynomial
namespace Irreducible
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
/-- The separable degree of an irreducible polynomial divides its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree (h : Irreducible f) :
f.natSepDegree ∣ f.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨q, _⟩ := ExpChar.exists F
have hf := h.hasSeparableContraction q
rw [hf.natSepDegree_eq]
exact hf.dvd_degree
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y)`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨g, h1, n, rfl⟩ := hi.hasSeparableContraction q
have h2 : g.natDegree = 1 := by
rwa [natSepDegree_expand _ q, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree] at h
rw [((monic_expand_iff <| expChar_pow_pos F q n).mp hm).eq_X_add_C h2]
exact ⟨n, -(g.coeff 0), by rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
rw [h, natSepDegree_expand _ q, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
simp_rw [hi.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' q hm, map_sub, expand_X, expand_C]
end Irreducible
namespace Polynomial
namespace Monic
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible' := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic'
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic
/-- If a monic polynomial of separable degree one splits, then it is of form `(X - C y) ^ m` for
some non-zero natural number `m` and some element `y` of `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_splits (hm : f.Monic)
(hs : f.Splits (RingHom.id F))
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m : ℕ) (y : F), m ≠ 0 ∧ f = (X - C y) ^ m := by
have h1 := eq_prod_roots_of_monic_of_splits_id hm hs
have h2 := (natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f hs).symm
rw [h, aroots_def, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id, Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_one_iff] at h2
obtain ⟨h2, y, h3⟩ := h2
exact ⟨_, y, h2, by rwa [h3, Multiset.map_nsmul, Multiset.map_singleton, Multiset.prod_nsmul,
Multiset.prod_singleton] at h1⟩
/-- If a monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one, then it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y` for some natural number `n`,
and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no `q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_irreducible (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q]
(hm : f.Monic) (hi : Irreducible f) (h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F),
(n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
obtain ⟨n, y, hf⟩ := (hm.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible q hi).1 h
cases id ‹ExpChar F q› with
| zero =>
simp_rw [one_pow, pow_one] at hf ⊢
exact ⟨0, y, .inl rfl, hf⟩
| prime hq =>
refine ⟨n, y, (em _).imp id fun hn ⟨z, hy⟩ ↦ ?_, hf⟩
haveI := expChar_of_injective_ringHom (R := F) C_injective q
rw [hf, ← Nat.succ_pred hn, pow_succ, pow_mul, ← hy, frobenius_def, map_pow,
← sub_pow_expChar] at hi
exact not_irreducible_pow hq.ne_one hi
/-- If a monic polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has separable degree
one, then it is of the form `(X ^ (q ^ n) - C y) ^ m` for some non-zero natural number `m`,
some natural number `n`, and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no
`q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m n : ℕ) (y : F),
m ≠ 0 ∧ (n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = (X ^ q ^ n - C y) ^ m := by
obtain ⟨p, hM, hI, hf⟩ := exists_monic_irreducible_factor _ <| not_isUnit_of_natDegree_pos _
<| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| (natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff _).1 (h.symm ▸ Nat.one_ne_zero)
have hD := (h ▸ natSepDegree_le_of_dvd p f hf hm.ne_zero).antisymm <|
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| (natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff _).2 hI.natDegree_pos.ne'
obtain ⟨n, y, H, hp⟩ := hM.eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_irreducible q hI hD
have hF := multiplicity_finite_of_degree_pos_of_monic (degree_pos_of_irreducible hI) hM hm.ne_zero
have hne := (multiplicity.pos_of_dvd hF hf).ne'
refine ⟨_, n, y, hne, H, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, hf, H⟩ := multiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hF
rw [hf, natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime _ c <| IsCoprime.pow_left <|
(hI.coprime_or_dvd c).resolve_right H, natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero _ hne, hD,
add_right_eq_self, natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff] at h
simpa only [eq_one_of_monic_natDegree_zero ((hM.pow _).of_mul_monic_left (hf ▸ hm)) h,
mul_one, ← hp] using hf
/-- A monic polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has separable degree one
if and only if it is of the form `(X ^ (q ^ n) - C y) ^ m` for some non-zero natural number `m`,
some natural number `n`, and some element `y` of `F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic) :
f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ (m n : ℕ) (y : F), m ≠ 0 ∧ f = (X ^ q ^ n - C y) ^ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨m, n, y, hm, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨m, n, y, hm, -, h⟩ := hm.eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one q h
exact ⟨m, n, y, hm, h⟩
simp_rw [h, natSepDegree_pow, hm, ite_false, natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C]
end Monic
end Polynomial
namespace minpoly
variable {F E}
variable (q : ℕ) [hF : ExpChar F q] {x : E}
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if the minimal polynomial is of the form
`Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y)` for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_expand_X_sub_C : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), minpoly F x = expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· have halg : IsIntegral F x := by_contra fun h' ↦ by
simp only [eq_zero h', natSepDegree_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
exact (minpoly.irreducible halg).natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' q
(minpoly.monic halg) |>.1 h
rw [h, natSepDegree_expand _ q, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if the minimal polynomial is of the form
`X ^ (q ^ n) - C y` for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_pow_sub_C : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), minpoly F x = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
simp only [minpoly.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_expand_X_sub_C q, map_sub, expand_X, expand_C]
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if `x ^ (q ^ n) ∈ F` for some `n : ℕ`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_pow_mem : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ n : ℕ, x ^ q ^ n ∈ (algebraMap F E).range := by
convert_to _ ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), Polynomial.aeval x (X ^ q ^ n - C y) = 0
· simp_rw [RingHom.mem_range, map_sub, map_pow, aeval_C, aeval_X, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨n, y, hx⟩ := (minpoly.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_pow_sub_C q).1 h
exact ⟨n, y, hx ▸ aeval F x⟩
have hnezero := X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (expChar_pow_pos F q n) y
refine ((natSepDegree_le_of_dvd _ _ (minpoly.dvd F x h) hnezero).trans_eq <|
natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C q n y).antisymm ?_
rw [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
exact minpoly.natDegree_pos <| IsAlgebraic.isIntegral ⟨_, hnezero, h⟩
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if the minimal polynomial is of the form
`(X - x) ^ (q ^ n)` for some `n : ℕ`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_sub_C_pow : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ n : ℕ, (minpoly F x).map (algebraMap F E) = (X - C x) ^ q ^ n := by
haveI := expChar_of_injective_algebraMap (algebraMap F E).injective q
haveI := expChar_of_injective_algebraMap (NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective E E[X]) q
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ (natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_pow_mem q).2 ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨n, y, h⟩ := (natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_pow_sub_C q).1 h
have hx := congr_arg (Polynomial.aeval x) h.symm
rw [minpoly.aeval, map_sub, map_pow, aeval_X, aeval_C, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm] at hx
use n
rw [h, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X, map_C, hx, map_pow, ← sub_pow_expChar_pow]
apply_fun constantCoeff at h
simp_rw [map_pow, map_sub, constantCoeff_apply, coeff_map, coeff_X_zero, coeff_C_zero] at h
rw [zero_sub, neg_pow, ExpChar.neg_one_pow_expChar_pow] at h
exact ⟨n, -(minpoly F x).coeff 0, by rw [map_neg, h]; ring1⟩
end minpoly
namespace IntermediateField
/-- The separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the separable degree of the
minimal polynomial of `α` over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree {α : E} (halg : IsAlgebraic F α) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ = (minpoly F α).natSepDegree := by
have : finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ = _ := Nat.card_congr
(algHomAdjoinIntegralEquiv F (K := AlgebraicClosure F⟮α⟯) halg.isIntegral)
rw [this, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (E := AlgebraicClosure F⟮α⟯),
← Fintype.card_coe]
simp_rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset]
-- The separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` divides the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F`.
-- Marked as `private` because it is a special case of `finSepDegree_dvd_finrank`.
private theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_dvd_finrank (α : E) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ ∣ finrank F F⟮α⟯ := by
by_cases halg : IsAlgebraic F α
· rw [finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree F E halg, adjoin.finrank halg.isIntegral]
exact (minpoly.irreducible halg.isIntegral).natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree
have : finrank F F⟮α⟯ = 0 := finrank_of_infinite_dimensional fun _ ↦
halg ((AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen F α).1 (IsIntegral.of_finite F _)).isAlgebraic
rw [this]
exact dvd_zero _
/-- The separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is smaller than the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if `α` is
algebraic over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_le_finrank (α : E) (halg : IsAlgebraic F α) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ ≤ finrank F F⟮α⟯ := by
haveI := adjoin.finiteDimensional halg.isIntegral
exact Nat.le_of_dvd finrank_pos <| finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_dvd_finrank F E α
/-- If `α` is algebraic over `F`, then the separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the degree
of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if and only if `α` is a separable element. -/
theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff (α : E) (halg : IsAlgebraic F α) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ = finrank F F⟮α⟯ ↔ (minpoly F α).Separable := by
rw [finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree F E halg, adjoin.finrank halg.isIntegral,
natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff _ (minpoly.ne_zero halg.isIntegral)]
end IntermediateField
namespace Field
/-- The separable degree of any field extension `E / F` divides the degree of `E / F`. -/
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SeparableDegree.lean | 678 | 690 | theorem finSepDegree_dvd_finrank : finSepDegree F E ∣ finrank F E := by |
by_cases hfd : FiniteDimensional F E
· rw [← finSepDegree_top F, ← finrank_top F E]
refine induction_on_adjoin (fun K : IntermediateField F E ↦ finSepDegree F K ∣ finrank F K)
(by simp_rw [finSepDegree_bot, IntermediateField.finrank_bot, one_dvd]) (fun L x h ↦ ?_) ⊤
simp only at h ⊢
have hdvd := mul_dvd_mul h <| finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_dvd_finrank L E x
set M := L⟮x⟯
have := Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite L M
rwa [finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic F L M,
FiniteDimensional.finrank_mul_finrank F L M] at hdvd
rw [finrank_of_infinite_dimensional hfd]
exact dvd_zero _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Commute
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Invertible
import Mathlib.Order.Synonym
#align_import algebra.field.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"05101c3df9d9cfe9430edc205860c79b6d660102"
/-!
# Lemmas about division (semi)rings and (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
universe u
variable {α β K : Type*}
section DivisionSemiring
variable [DivisionSemiring α] {a b c d : α}
theorem add_div (a b c : α) : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, add_mul]
#align add_div add_div
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add_div_same (a b c : α) : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
(add_div _ _ _).symm
#align div_add_div_same div_add_div_same
theorem same_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : (b + a) / b = 1 + a / b := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
#align same_add_div same_add_div
theorem div_add_same (h : b ≠ 0) : (a + b) / b = a / b + 1 := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
#align div_add_same div_add_same
theorem one_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 + a / b = (b + a) / b :=
(same_add_div h).symm
#align one_add_div one_add_div
theorem div_add_one (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b + 1 = (a + b) / b :=
(div_add_same h).symm
#align div_add_one div_add_one
/-- See `inv_add_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
theorem inv_add_inv' (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (a + b) * b⁻¹ :=
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero ha; let _ := invertibleOfNonzero hb; invOf_add_invOf a b
theorem one_div_mul_add_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a * (a + b) * (1 / b) = 1 / a + 1 / b := by
simpa only [one_div] using (inv_add_inv' ha hb).symm
#align one_div_mul_add_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div one_div_mul_add_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div
theorem add_div_eq_mul_add_div (a b : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a + b / c = (a * c + b) / c :=
(eq_div_iff_mul_eq hc).2 <| by rw [right_distrib, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc]
#align add_div_eq_mul_add_div add_div_eq_mul_add_div
@[field_simps]
theorem add_div' (a b c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : b + a / c = (b * c + a) / c := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hc]
#align add_div' add_div'
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add' (a b c : α) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c + b = (a + b * c) / c := by
rwa [add_comm, add_div', add_comm]
#align div_add' div_add'
protected theorem Commute.div_add_div (hbc : Commute b c) (hbd : Commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b + c / d = (a * d + b * c) / (b * d) := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_mul_right _ b hd, hbc.eq, hbd.eq, mul_div_mul_right c d hb]
#align commute.div_add_div Commute.div_add_div
protected theorem Commute.one_div_add_one_div (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [(Commute.one_right a).div_add_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one, add_comm]
#align commute.one_div_add_one_div Commute.one_div_add_one_div
protected theorem Commute.inv_add_inv (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [inv_eq_one_div, inv_eq_one_div, hab.one_div_add_one_div ha hb]
#align commute.inv_add_inv Commute.inv_add_inv
end DivisionSemiring
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid K] [HasDistribNeg K] {a b : K}
theorem one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one : (1 : K) / -1 = -1 :=
have : -1 * -1 = (1 : K) := by rw [neg_mul_neg, one_mul]
Eq.symm (eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right this)
#align one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one
theorem one_div_neg_eq_neg_one_div (a : K) : 1 / -a = -(1 / a) :=
calc
1 / -a = 1 / (-1 * a) := by rw [neg_eq_neg_one_mul]
_ = 1 / a * (1 / -1) := by rw [one_div_mul_one_div_rev]
_ = 1 / a * -1 := by rw [one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one]
_ = -(1 / a) := by rw [mul_neg, mul_one]
#align one_div_neg_eq_neg_one_div one_div_neg_eq_neg_one_div
theorem div_neg_eq_neg_div (a b : K) : b / -a = -(b / a) :=
calc
b / -a = b * (1 / -a) := by rw [← inv_eq_one_div, division_def]
_ = b * -(1 / a) := by rw [one_div_neg_eq_neg_one_div]
_ = -(b * (1 / a)) := by rw [neg_mul_eq_mul_neg]
_ = -(b / a) := by rw [mul_one_div]
#align div_neg_eq_neg_div div_neg_eq_neg_div
theorem neg_div (a b : K) : -b / a = -(b / a) := by
rw [neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_div_assoc, ← neg_eq_neg_one_mul]
#align neg_div neg_div
@[field_simps]
theorem neg_div' (a b : K) : -(b / a) = -b / a := by simp [neg_div]
#align neg_div' neg_div'
@[simp]
theorem neg_div_neg_eq (a b : K) : -a / -b = a / b := by rw [div_neg_eq_neg_div, neg_div, neg_neg]
#align neg_div_neg_eq neg_div_neg_eq
theorem neg_inv : -a⁻¹ = (-a)⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, inv_eq_one_div, div_neg_eq_neg_div]
#align neg_inv neg_inv
theorem div_neg (a : K) : a / -b = -(a / b) := by rw [← div_neg_eq_neg_div]
#align div_neg div_neg
| Mathlib/Algebra/Field/Basic.lean | 135 | 135 | theorem inv_neg : (-a)⁻¹ = -a⁻¹ := by | rw [neg_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Linear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.homology.homotopy from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"618ea3d5c99240cd7000d8376924906a148bf9ff"
/-!
# Chain homotopies
We define chain homotopies, and prove that homotopic chain maps induce the same map on homology.
-/
universe v u
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Category Limits HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [Preadditive V]
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} {C D E : HomologicalComplex V c}
variable (f g : C ⟶ D) (h k : D ⟶ E) (i : ι)
section
/-- The composition of `C.d i (c.next i) ≫ f (c.next i) i`. -/
def dNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => C.d i (c.next i) ≫ f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _
#align d_next dNext
/-- `f (c.next i) i`. -/
def fromNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.xNext i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ => rfl
#align from_next fromNext
@[simp]
theorem dNext_eq_dFrom_fromNext (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) :
dNext i f = C.dFrom i ≫ fromNext i f :=
rfl
#align d_next_eq_d_from_from_next dNext_eq_dFrom_fromNext
theorem dNext_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {i i' : ι} (w : c.Rel i i') :
dNext i f = C.d i i' ≫ f i' i := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' w
rfl
#align d_next_eq dNext_eq
lemma dNext_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
dNext i f = 0 := by
dsimp [dNext]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, zero_comp]
@[simp 1100]
theorem dNext_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f i ≫ dNext i g :=
(f.comm_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align d_next_comp_left dNext_comp_left
@[simp 1100]
theorem dNext_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = dNext i f ≫ g.f i :=
(assoc _ _ _).symm
#align d_next_comp_right dNext_comp_right
/-- The composition `f j (c.prev j) ≫ D.d (c.prev j) j`. -/
def prevD (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.X j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j) ≫ D.d (c.prev j) j) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _
#align prev_d prevD
lemma prevD_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel (c.prev i) i) :
prevD i f = 0 := by
dsimp [prevD]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, comp_zero]
/-- `f j (c.prev j)`. -/
def toPrev (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.xPrev j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j)) fun _ _ => rfl
#align to_prev toPrev
@[simp]
theorem prevD_eq_toPrev_dTo (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (j : ι) :
prevD j f = toPrev j f ≫ D.dTo j :=
rfl
#align prev_d_eq_to_prev_d_to prevD_eq_toPrev_dTo
theorem prevD_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {j j' : ι} (w : c.Rel j' j) :
prevD j f = f j j' ≫ D.d j' j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' w
rfl
#align prev_d_eq prevD_eq
@[simp 1100]
theorem prevD_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f j ≫ prevD j g :=
assoc _ _ _
#align prev_d_comp_left prevD_comp_left
@[simp 1100]
theorem prevD_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = prevD j f ≫ g.f j := by
dsimp [prevD]
simp only [assoc, g.comm]
#align prev_d_comp_right prevD_comp_right
theorem dNext_nat (C D : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
dNext i f = C.d i (i - 1) ≫ f (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [dNext]
cases i
· simp only [shape, ChainComplex.next_nat_zero, ComplexShape.down_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, zero_comp]
· congr <;> simp
#align d_next_nat dNext_nat
theorem prevD_nat (C D : CochainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
prevD i f = f i (i - 1) ≫ D.d (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [prevD]
cases i
· simp only [shape, CochainComplex.prev_nat_zero, ComplexShape.up_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, comp_zero]
· congr <;> simp
#align prev_d_nat prevD_nat
-- Porting note(#5171): removed @[has_nonempty_instance]
/-- A homotopy `h` between chain maps `f` and `g` consists of components `h i j : C.X i ⟶ D.X j`
which are zero unless `c.Rel j i`, satisfying the homotopy condition.
-/
@[ext]
structure Homotopy (f g : C ⟶ D) where
hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j
zero : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel j i → hom i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
comm : ∀ i, f.f i = dNext i hom + prevD i hom + g.f i := by aesop_cat
#align homotopy Homotopy
variable {f g}
namespace Homotopy
/-- `f` is homotopic to `g` iff `f - g` is homotopic to `0`.
-/
def equivSubZero : Homotopy f g ≃ Homotopy (f - g) 0 where
toFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun i j w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simp [h.comm] }
invFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun i j w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simpa [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] using h.comm i }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
#align homotopy.equiv_sub_zero Homotopy.equivSubZero
/-- Equal chain maps are homotopic. -/
@[simps]
def ofEq (h : f = g) : Homotopy f g where
hom := 0
zero _ _ _ := rfl
#align homotopy.of_eq Homotopy.ofEq
/-- Every chain map is homotopic to itself. -/
@[simps!, refl]
def refl (f : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy f f :=
ofEq (rfl : f = f)
#align homotopy.refl Homotopy.refl
/-- `f` is homotopic to `g` iff `g` is homotopic to `f`. -/
@[simps!, symm]
def symm {f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy g f where
hom := -h.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.neg_apply, h.zero i j w, neg_zero]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_neg, AddMonoidHom.map_neg, h.comm, ← neg_add, ← add_assoc, neg_add_self,
zero_add]
#align homotopy.symm Homotopy.symm
/-- homotopy is a transitive relation. -/
@[simps!, trans]
def trans {e f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (k : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy e g where
hom := h.hom + k.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h.zero i j w, k.zero i j w, zero_add]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, AddMonoidHom.map_add, h.comm, k.comm]
abel
#align homotopy.trans Homotopy.trans
/-- the sum of two homotopies is a homotopy between the sum of the respective morphisms. -/
@[simps!]
def add {f₁ g₁ f₂ g₂ : C ⟶ D} (h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) :
Homotopy (f₁ + f₂) (g₁ + g₂) where
hom := h₁.hom + h₂.hom
zero i j hij := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h₁.zero i j hij, h₂.zero i j hij, add_zero]
comm i := by
simp only [HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply, h₁.comm, h₂.comm, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
abel
#align homotopy.add Homotopy.add
/-- the scalar multiplication of an homotopy -/
@[simps!]
def smul {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Linear R V] (h : Homotopy f g) (a : R) :
Homotopy (a • f) (a • g) where
hom i j := a • h.hom i j
zero i j hij := by
dsimp
rw [h.zero i j hij, smul_zero]
comm i := by
dsimp
rw [h.comm]
dsimp [fromNext, toPrev]
simp only [smul_add, Linear.comp_smul, Linear.smul_comp]
/-- homotopy is closed under composition (on the right) -/
@[simps]
def compRight {e f : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (g : D ⟶ E) : Homotopy (e ≫ g) (f ≫ g) where
hom i j := h.hom i j ≫ g.f j
zero i j w := by dsimp; rw [h.zero i j w, zero_comp]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_right, prevD_comp_right, Preadditive.add_comp,
comp_f, Preadditive.add_comp]
#align homotopy.comp_right Homotopy.compRight
/-- homotopy is closed under composition (on the left) -/
@[simps]
def compLeft {f g : D ⟶ E} (h : Homotopy f g) (e : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (e ≫ f) (e ≫ g) where
hom i j := e.f i ≫ h.hom i j
zero i j w := by dsimp; rw [h.zero i j w, comp_zero]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_left, prevD_comp_left, comp_f,
Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.comp_add]
#align homotopy.comp_left Homotopy.compLeft
/-- homotopy is closed under composition -/
@[simps!]
def comp {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} {f₁ g₁ : C₁ ⟶ C₂} {f₂ g₂ : C₂ ⟶ C₃}
(h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) : Homotopy (f₁ ≫ f₂) (g₁ ≫ g₂) :=
(h₁.compRight _).trans (h₂.compLeft _)
#align homotopy.comp Homotopy.comp
/-- a variant of `Homotopy.compRight` useful for dealing with homotopy equivalences. -/
@[simps!]
def compRightId {f : C ⟶ C} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 C)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (f ≫ g) g :=
(h.compRight g).trans (ofEq <| id_comp _)
#align homotopy.comp_right_id Homotopy.compRightId
/-- a variant of `Homotopy.compLeft` useful for dealing with homotopy equivalences. -/
@[simps!]
def compLeftId {f : D ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 D)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (g ≫ f) g :=
(h.compLeft g).trans (ofEq <| comp_id _)
#align homotopy.comp_left_id Homotopy.compLeftId
/-!
Null homotopic maps can be constructed using the formula `hd+dh`. We show that
these morphisms are homotopic to `0` and provide some convenient simplification
lemmas that give a degreewise description of `hd+dh`, depending on whether we have
two differentials going to and from a certain degree, only one, or none.
-/
/-- The null homotopic map associated to a family `hom` of morphisms `C_i ⟶ D_j`.
This is the same datum as for the field `hom` in the structure `Homotopy`. For
this definition, we do not need the field `zero` of that structure
as this definition uses only the maps `C_i ⟶ C_j` when `c.Rel j i`. -/
def nullHomotopicMap (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) : C ⟶ D where
f i := dNext i hom + prevD i hom
comm' i j hij := by
have eq1 : prevD i hom ≫ D.d i j = 0 := by
simp only [prevD, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, assoc, d_comp_d, comp_zero]
have eq2 : C.d i j ≫ dNext j hom = 0 := by
simp only [dNext, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]
dsimp only
rw [dNext_eq hom hij, prevD_eq hom hij, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp, eq1, eq2,
add_zero, zero_add, assoc]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap
/-- Variant of `nullHomotopicMap` where the input consists only of the
relevant maps `C_i ⟶ D_j` such that `c.Rel j i`. -/
def nullHomotopicMap' (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) : C ⟶ D :=
nullHomotopicMap fun i j => dite (c.Rel j i) (h i j) fun _ => 0
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map' Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap` with the postcomposition by a morphism
of complexes. -/
theorem nullHomotopicMap_comp (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) :
nullHomotopicMap hom ≫ g = nullHomotopicMap fun i j => hom i j ≫ g.f j := by
ext n
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, fromNext, toPrev, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
simp only [Preadditive.add_comp, assoc, g.comm]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map_comp Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap_comp
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap'` with the postcomposition by a morphism
of complexes. -/
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_comp (hom : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) (g : D ⟶ E) :
nullHomotopicMap' hom ≫ g = nullHomotopicMap' fun i j hij => hom i j hij ≫ g.f j := by
ext n
erw [nullHomotopicMap_comp]
congr
ext i j
split_ifs
· rfl
· rw [zero_comp]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map'_comp Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_comp
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap` with the precomposition by a morphism
of complexes. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Homotopy.lean | 312 | 316 | theorem comp_nullHomotopicMap (f : C ⟶ D) (hom : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) :
f ≫ nullHomotopicMap hom = nullHomotopicMap fun i j => f.f i ≫ hom i j := by |
ext n
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, fromNext, toPrev, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
simp only [Preadditive.comp_add, assoc, f.comm_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
#align real.le_rpow_add Real.le_rpow_add
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
#align real.rpow_sum_of_pos Real.rpow_sum_of_pos
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
#align real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg Real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg Real.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub Real.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub' Real.rpow_sub'
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
#align complex.of_real_cpow Complex.ofReal_cpow
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, abs.map_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg,
arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx), ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align complex.of_real_cpow_of_nonpos Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(abs x ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [abs.pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = (abs x) ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = (abs x) ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem abs_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, abs_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (abs.pos hz)]
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero Complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero
theorem abs_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact abs_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [map_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, map_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_imp Complex.abs_cpow_of_imp
theorem abs_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : abs (z ^ w) ≤ abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (abs_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align complex.abs_cpow_le Complex.abs_cpow_le
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
#align complex.abs_cpow_real Complex.abs_cpow_real
@[simp]
theorem abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← abs_cpow_real]; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
#align complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat Complex.abs_cpow_inv_nat
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : abs (x ^ y) = x ^ y.re := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, abs_of_nonneg hx.le]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
theorem abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
abs (x ^ y) = x ^ re y := by
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, _root_.abs_of_nonneg]
#align complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg Complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero (n : ℕ) {s : ℂ} (hs : s.re ≠ 0) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg hs]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [norm_eq_abs, ← ofReal_natCast, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) : 0 < ‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ :=
(norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn _).symm ▸ Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _
theorem cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (z : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ (↑y * z) = (↑(x ^ y) : ℂ) ^ z := by
rw [cpow_mul, ofReal_cpow hx]
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, neg_lt_zero]; exact Real.pi_pos
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]; exact Real.pi_pos.le
#align complex.cpow_mul_of_real_nonneg Complex.cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg
end Complex
/-! ### Positivity extension -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is positive (namely 1)
when the exponent is zero. The other cases are done in `evalRpow`. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (0 : ℝ)]
def evalRpowZero : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ (0 : ℝ)) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_zero_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is nonnegative when
the base is nonnegative and positive when the base is positive. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (_ : ℝ)]
def evalRpow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ ($b : ℝ)) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_pos_of_pos $pa $b))
| .nonnegative pa =>
pure (.nonnegative q(Real.rpow_nonneg $pa $b))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-!
## Further algebraic properties of `rpow`
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
rw [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_cpow (rpow_nonneg hx _),
Complex.ofReal_cpow hx, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.cpow_mul, Complex.ofReal_cpow hx] <;>
simp only [(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, (Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, Complex.ofReal_im,
neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
#align real.rpow_mul Real.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_add_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_def, rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_add,
Complex.cpow_add _ _ (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx), Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.cpow_intCast, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, mul_comm, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.rpow_add_int Real.rpow_add_int
theorem rpow_add_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_add_nat Real.rpow_add_nat
theorem rpow_sub_int {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_int hx y (-n)
#align real.rpow_sub_int Real.rpow_sub_int
theorem rpow_sub_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_sub_int hx y n
#align real.rpow_sub_nat Real.rpow_sub_nat
lemma rpow_add_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_add_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_sub_int' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_sub_nat' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_natCast]
theorem rpow_add_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_add_one Real.rpow_add_one
theorem rpow_sub_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_nat hx y 1
#align real.rpow_sub_one Real.rpow_sub_one
lemma rpow_add_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_sub_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [← rpow_natCast]
simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat]
#align real.rpow_two Real.rpow_two
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹ by rwa [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one] at H
simp only [rpow_intCast, zpow_one, zpow_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg_one Real.rpow_neg_one
theorem mul_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
iterate 2 rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg]; split_ifs with h_ifs <;> simp_all
· rw [log_mul ‹_› ‹_›, add_mul, exp_add, rpow_def_of_pos (hy.lt_of_ne' ‹_›)]
all_goals positivity
#align real.mul_rpow Real.mul_rpow
theorem inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm]
#align real.inv_rpow Real.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
#align real.div_rpow Real.div_rpow
theorem log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x ^ y) = y * log x := by
apply exp_injective
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y]
#align real.log_rpow Real.log_rpow
theorem mul_log_eq_log_iff {x y z : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hz : 0 < z) :
y * log x = log z ↔ x ^ y = z :=
⟨fun h ↦ log_injOn_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hz <| log_rpow hx _ |>.trans h,
by rintro rfl; rw [log_rpow hx]⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
#align real.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
/-! Note: lemmas about `(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r)` such as `Real.finset_prod_rpow` are proved
in `Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean` instead. -/
/-!
## Order and monotonicity
-/
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z := by
rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hx; cases' hx with hx hx
· rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)]
exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa [← hx] at hxy) _
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow Real.rpow_lt_rpow
theorem strictMonoOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
StrictMonoOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow ha hab hr
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁'); · rfl
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with (rfl | h₂'); · simp
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
#align real.rpow_le_rpow Real.rpow_le_rpow
theorem monotoneOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
MonotoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow ha hab hr
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_lt_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_pos.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans_le hxy
rw [← inv_le_inv, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_le_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_nonneg.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), fun h => rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_iff Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h ↦ rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx h hz.le,
fun h ↦ rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hy h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy hx hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
#align real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx)
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx)
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg {x y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y < x) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z < y ^ z := by
have hx : 0 < x := hy.trans hxy
rw [← neg_neg z, Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) (-z), Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy) (-z),
inv_lt_inv (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _)]
exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow (by positivity) hxy <| neg_pos_of_neg hz
theorem strictAntiOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
StrictAntiOn (fun (x:ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg ha hab hr
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with hz_zero | rfl
case inl =>
rcases ne_or_eq x y with hxy' | rfl
case inl =>
exact le_of_lt <| rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg hy (Ne.lt_of_le (id (Ne.symm hxy')) hxy)
(Ne.lt_of_le hz_zero hz)
case inr => simp
case inr => simp
theorem antitoneOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_nonpos {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) :
AntitoneOn (fun (x:ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos ha hab hr
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ y ≤ z := by
have x_pos : 0 < x := lt_trans zero_lt_one hx
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos y) (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos z), log_rpow x_pos,
log_rpow x_pos, mul_le_mul_right (log_pos hx)]
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ y < z := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hx, lt_iff_not_le]
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff Real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1)
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1)
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ z ≤ y := by
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 y) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 z), log_rpow hx0, log_rpow hx0,
mul_le_mul_right_of_neg (log_neg hx0 hx1)]
#align real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ z < y := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one hx0 hx1, lt_iff_not_le]
#align real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one Real.rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one
theorem rpow_lt_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
#align real.rpow_lt_one Real.rpow_lt_one
theorem rpow_le_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
#align real.rpow_le_one Real.rpow_le_one
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 := by
convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
#align real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
#align real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos
theorem one_lt_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
#align real.one_lt_rpow Real.one_lt_rpow
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 718 | 720 | theorem one_le_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z := by |
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Free.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.braided from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
/-!
# Braided and symmetric monoidal categories
The basic definitions of braided monoidal categories, and symmetric monoidal categories,
as well as braided functors.
## Implementation note
We make `BraidedCategory` another typeclass, but then have `SymmetricCategory` extend this.
The rationale is that we are not carrying any additional data, just requiring a property.
## Future work
* Construct the Drinfeld center of a monoidal category as a braided monoidal category.
* Say something about pseudo-natural transformations.
## References
* [Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, Victor Ostrik, *Tensor categories*][egno15]
-/
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A braided monoidal category is a monoidal category equipped with a braiding isomorphism
`β_ X Y : X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X`
which is natural in both arguments,
and also satisfies the two hexagon identities.
-/
class BraidedCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
/-- The braiding natural isomorphism. -/
braiding : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X
braiding_naturality_right :
∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z),
X ◁ f ≫ (braiding X Z).hom = (braiding X Y).hom ≫ f ▷ X := by
aesop_cat
braiding_naturality_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C),
f ▷ Z ≫ (braiding Y Z).hom = (braiding X Z).hom ≫ Z ◁ f := by
aesop_cat
/-- The first hexagon identity. -/
hexagon_forward :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ▷ Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (Y ◁ (braiding X Z).hom) := by
aesop_cat
/-- The second hexagon identity. -/
hexagon_reverse :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(X ◁ (braiding Y Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((braiding X Z).hom ▷ Y) := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.braided_category CategoryTheory.BraidedCategory
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)]
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_left
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_right
attribute [reassoc] BraidedCategory.hexagon_forward BraidedCategory.hexagon_reverse
open Category
open MonoidalCategory
open BraidedCategory
@[inherit_doc]
notation "β_" => BraidedCategory.braiding
namespace BraidedCategory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] [BraidedCategory.{v} C]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫
(β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫ (α_ Z X Y).hom := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Z X Y).inv).1
simp [hexagon_reverse]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).hom).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Y Z X).hom).1
simp [hexagon_forward]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ Z X Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ Y Z X).hom ≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫
(β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (braiding Y Y').hom = (braiding X X').hom ≫ (g ⊗ f) := by
rw [tensorHom_def' f g, tensorHom_def g f]
simp_rw [Category.assoc, braiding_naturality_left, braiding_naturality_right_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_right (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
X ◁ f ≫ (β_ Z X).inv = (β_ Y X).inv ≫ f ▷ X :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_left f X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ (β_ Z Y).inv = (β_ Z X).inv ≫ Z ◁ f :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_right Z f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (β_ Y' Y).inv = (β_ X' X).inv ≫ (g ⊗ f) :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality g f
@[reassoc]
theorem yang_baxter (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X ≫ (α_ Z Y X).hom =
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫
(α_ Z X Y).hom ≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom := by
rw [← braiding_tensor_right_assoc X Y Z, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).inv]
repeat rw [assoc]
rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id, ← braiding_naturality_right, braiding_tensor_right]
theorem yang_baxter' (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ⊗≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X =
𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ⊗≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).hom]
convert yang_baxter X Y Z using 1
all_goals coherence
theorem yang_baxter_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) ≪≫ (α_ Y Z X).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ Y Z) X ≪≫ (α_ Z Y X) =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y ≪≫ α_ Z X Y ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Z (β_ X Y) := Iso.ext (yang_baxter X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_forward_iso (X Y Z : C) :
α_ X Y Z ≪≫ β_ X (Y ⊗ Z) ≪≫ α_ Y Z X =
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_forward X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_reverse_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≪≫ (α_ Z X Y).symm =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_reverse X Y Z)
@[reassoc]
theorem hexagon_forward_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem hexagon_reverse_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ Z X Y).hom ≫ (β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv := by
simp
end BraidedCategory
/--
Verifying the axioms for a braiding by checking that the candidate braiding is sent to a braiding
by a faithful monoidal functor.
-/
def braidedCategoryOfFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [MonoidalCategory C]
[MonoidalCategory D] (F : MonoidalFunctor C D) [F.Faithful] [BraidedCategory D]
(β : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X)
(w : ∀ X Y, F.μ _ _ ≫ F.map (β X Y).hom = (β_ _ _).hom ≫ F.μ _ _) : BraidedCategory C where
braiding := β
braiding_naturality_left := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ ?_ ?_)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left_assoc, w, Functor.map_comp,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_left_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right]
braiding_naturality_right := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ ?_ ?_)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right_assoc, w, Functor.map_comp,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_right_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left]
hexagon_forward := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ _ _)).1 ?_
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ _ _ ▷ _)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, ←
LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left_assoc, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, w,
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_assoc,
LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_assoc, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right, ←
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, w, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_right_assoc,
LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity, hexagon_forward_assoc]
hexagon_reverse := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (F.μ _ _)).1 ?_
refine (cancel_epi (_ ◁ F.μ _ _)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, ←
LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right_assoc, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, w,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_inv_assoc,
LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_inv_assoc, ← LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left,
← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, w, comp_whiskerRight_assoc, reassoc_of% w,
braiding_naturality_left_assoc, LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_inv, hexagon_reverse_assoc]
#align category_theory.braided_category_of_faithful CategoryTheory.braidedCategoryOfFaithful
/-- Pull back a braiding along a fully faithful monoidal functor. -/
noncomputable def braidedCategoryOfFullyFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
[MonoidalCategory C] [MonoidalCategory D] (F : MonoidalFunctor C D) [F.Full]
[F.Faithful] [BraidedCategory D] : BraidedCategory C :=
braidedCategoryOfFaithful F
(fun X Y => F.toFunctor.preimageIso
((asIso (F.μ _ _)).symm ≪≫ β_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) ≪≫ asIso (F.μ _ _)))
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.braided_category_of_fully_faithful CategoryTheory.braidedCategoryOfFullyFaithful
section
/-!
We now establish how the braiding interacts with the unitors.
I couldn't find a detailed proof in print, but this is discussed in:
* Proposition 1 of André Joyal and Ross Street,
"Braided monoidal categories", Macquarie Math Reports 860081 (1986).
* Proposition 2.1 of André Joyal and Ross Street,
"Braided tensor categories" , Adv. Math. 102 (1993), 20–78.
* Exercise 8.1.6 of Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
"Tensor categories", vol 25, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs (2015), AMS.
-/
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C] [BraidedCategory C]
theorem braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁ (X : C) :
(α_ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) X).hom ≫
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv) ≫ (α_ _ X _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ _) =
((λ_ _).hom ▷ X) ≫ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv := by
coherence
#align category_theory.braiding_left_unitor_aux₁ CategoryTheory.braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁
theorem braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂ (X : C) :
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C :=
calc
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) =
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
coherence
_ = ((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (β_ X _).hom) ≫
(_ ◁ (β_ X _).inv) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (β_ X _).inv) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫
((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
(slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← hexagon_forward]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ ((λ_ _).hom ▷ X) ≫ (β_ X _).inv := by
rw [braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (λ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ X _).inv := by
(slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← braiding_naturality_right]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (λ_ _).hom) := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
_ = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C := by rw [triangle]
#align category_theory.braiding_left_unitor_aux₂ CategoryTheory.braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂
@[reassoc]
theorem braiding_leftUnitor (X : C) : (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ (λ_ X).hom = (ρ_ X).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂]
#align category_theory.braiding_left_unitor CategoryTheory.braiding_leftUnitor
theorem braiding_rightUnitor_aux₁ (X : C) :
(α_ X (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫
((β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ X _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) =
(X ◁ (ρ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv := by
coherence
#align category_theory.braiding_right_unitor_aux₁ CategoryTheory.braiding_rightUnitor_aux₁
theorem braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂ (X : C) :
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) = 𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X).hom :=
calc
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) =
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
coherence
_ = (𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((β_ _ X).hom ▷ _) ≫
((β_ _ X).inv ▷ _) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((β_ _ X).inv ▷ _) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫
(𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
(slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← hexagon_reverse]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (X ◁ (ρ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ _ X).inv := by
rw [braiding_rightUnitor_aux₁]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((ρ_ _).hom ▷ _) ≫ (β_ _ X).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).inv := by
(slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← braiding_naturality_left]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((ρ_ _).hom ▷ _) := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
_ = 𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X).hom := by rw [triangle_assoc_comp_right]
#align category_theory.braiding_right_unitor_aux₂ CategoryTheory.braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂
@[reassoc]
theorem braiding_rightUnitor (X : C) : (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).hom = (λ_ X).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂]
#align category_theory.braiding_right_unitor CategoryTheory.braiding_rightUnitor
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_tensorUnit_left (X : C) : (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
simp [← braiding_rightUnitor]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_inv_tensorUnit_left (X : C) : (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ (λ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_ext]
rw [braiding_tensorUnit_left]
coherence
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_braiding (X : C) : (λ_ X).inv ≫ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom = (ρ_ X).inv := by
simp
#align category_theory.left_unitor_inv_braiding CategoryTheory.leftUnitor_inv_braiding
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_braiding (X : C) : (ρ_ X).inv ≫ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom = (λ_ X).inv := by
apply (cancel_mono (λ_ X).hom).1
simp only [assoc, braiding_leftUnitor, Iso.inv_hom_id]
#align category_theory.right_unitor_inv_braiding CategoryTheory.rightUnitor_inv_braiding
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_tensorUnit_right (X : C) : (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ (λ_ X).inv := by
simp [← rightUnitor_inv_braiding]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_inv_tensorUnit_right (X : C) : (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_ext]
rw [braiding_tensorUnit_right]
coherence
end
/--
A symmetric monoidal category is a braided monoidal category for which the braiding is symmetric.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFW>.
-/
class SymmetricCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] extends
BraidedCategory.{v} C where
-- braiding symmetric:
symmetry : ∀ X Y : C, (β_ X Y).hom ≫ (β_ Y X).hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.symmetric_category CategoryTheory.SymmetricCategory
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] SymmetricCategory.symmetry
lemma SymmetricCategory.braiding_swap_eq_inv_braiding {C : Type u₁}
[Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C] [SymmetricCategory C] (X Y : C) :
(β_ Y X).hom = (β_ X Y).inv := Iso.inv_ext' (symmetry X Y)
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C] [BraidedCategory C]
variable (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory D] [BraidedCategory D]
variable (E : Type u₃) [Category.{v₃} E] [MonoidalCategory E] [BraidedCategory E]
/-- A lax braided functor between braided monoidal categories is a lax monoidal functor
which preserves the braiding.
-/
structure LaxBraidedFunctor extends LaxMonoidalFunctor C D where
braided : ∀ X Y : C, μ X Y ≫ map (β_ X Y).hom = (β_ (obj X) (obj Y)).hom ≫ μ Y X := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.lax_braided_functor CategoryTheory.LaxBraidedFunctor
namespace LaxBraidedFunctor
/-- The identity lax braided monoidal functor. -/
@[simps!]
def id : LaxBraidedFunctor C C :=
{ MonoidalFunctor.id C with }
#align category_theory.lax_braided_functor.id CategoryTheory.LaxBraidedFunctor.id
instance : Inhabited (LaxBraidedFunctor C C) :=
⟨id C⟩
variable {C D E}
/-- The composition of lax braided monoidal functors. -/
@[simps!]
def comp (F : LaxBraidedFunctor C D) (G : LaxBraidedFunctor D E) : LaxBraidedFunctor C E :=
{ LaxMonoidalFunctor.comp F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor G.toLaxMonoidalFunctor with
braided := fun X Y => by
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← CategoryTheory.Functor.map_comp, F.braided, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_comp]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [G.braided]
simp only [Category.assoc] }
#align category_theory.lax_braided_functor.comp CategoryTheory.LaxBraidedFunctor.comp
instance categoryLaxBraidedFunctor : Category (LaxBraidedFunctor C D) :=
InducedCategory.category LaxBraidedFunctor.toLaxMonoidalFunctor
#align category_theory.lax_braided_functor.category_lax_braided_functor CategoryTheory.LaxBraidedFunctor.categoryLaxBraidedFunctor
-- Porting note: added, as `MonoidalNatTrans.ext` does not apply to morphisms.
@[ext]
lemma ext' {F G : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} {α β : F ⟶ G} (w : ∀ X : C, α.app X = β.app X) : α = β :=
MonoidalNatTrans.ext _ _ (funext w)
@[simp]
theorem comp_toNatTrans {F G H : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} :
(α ≫ β).toNatTrans = @CategoryStruct.comp (C ⥤ D) _ _ _ _ α.toNatTrans β.toNatTrans :=
rfl
#align category_theory.lax_braided_functor.comp_to_nat_trans CategoryTheory.LaxBraidedFunctor.comp_toNatTrans
/-- Interpret a natural isomorphism of the underlying lax monoidal functors as an
isomorphism of the lax braided monoidal functors.
-/
@[simps]
def mkIso {F G : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} (i : F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor ≅ G.toLaxMonoidalFunctor) :
F ≅ G :=
{ i with }
#align category_theory.lax_braided_functor.mk_iso CategoryTheory.LaxBraidedFunctor.mkIso
end LaxBraidedFunctor
/-- A braided functor between braided monoidal categories is a monoidal functor
which preserves the braiding.
-/
structure BraidedFunctor extends MonoidalFunctor C D where
-- Note this is stated differently than for `LaxBraidedFunctor`.
-- We move the `μ X Y` to the right hand side,
-- so that this makes a good `@[simp]` lemma.
braided : ∀ X Y : C, map (β_ X Y).hom = inv (μ X Y) ≫ (β_ (obj X) (obj Y)).hom ≫ μ Y X := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.braided_functor CategoryTheory.BraidedFunctor
attribute [simp] BraidedFunctor.braided
/--
A braided category with a faithful braided functor to a symmetric category is itself symmetric.
-/
def symmetricCategoryOfFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [MonoidalCategory C]
[MonoidalCategory D] [BraidedCategory C] [SymmetricCategory D] (F : BraidedFunctor C D)
[F.Faithful] : SymmetricCategory C where
symmetry X Y := F.map_injective (by simp)
#align category_theory.symmetric_category_of_faithful CategoryTheory.symmetricCategoryOfFaithful
namespace BraidedFunctor
/-- Turn a braided functor into a lax braided functor. -/
@[simps toLaxMonoidalFunctor]
def toLaxBraidedFunctor (F : BraidedFunctor C D) : LaxBraidedFunctor C D :=
{ toLaxMonoidalFunctor := F.toLaxMonoidalFunctor
braided := fun X Y => by rw [F.braided]; simp }
#align category_theory.braided_functor.to_lax_braided_functor CategoryTheory.BraidedFunctor.toLaxBraidedFunctor
/-- The identity braided monoidal functor. -/
@[simps!]
def id : BraidedFunctor C C :=
{ MonoidalFunctor.id C with }
#align category_theory.braided_functor.id CategoryTheory.BraidedFunctor.id
instance : Inhabited (BraidedFunctor C C) :=
⟨id C⟩
variable {C D E}
/-- The composition of braided monoidal functors. -/
@[simps!]
def comp (F : BraidedFunctor C D) (G : BraidedFunctor D E) : BraidedFunctor C E :=
{ MonoidalFunctor.comp F.toMonoidalFunctor G.toMonoidalFunctor with }
#align category_theory.braided_functor.comp CategoryTheory.BraidedFunctor.comp
instance categoryBraidedFunctor : Category (BraidedFunctor C D) :=
InducedCategory.category BraidedFunctor.toMonoidalFunctor
#align category_theory.braided_functor.category_braided_functor CategoryTheory.BraidedFunctor.categoryBraidedFunctor
-- Porting note: added, as `MonoidalNatTrans.ext` does not apply to morphisms.
@[ext]
lemma ext' {F G : BraidedFunctor C D} {α β : F ⟶ G} (w : ∀ X : C, α.app X = β.app X) : α = β :=
MonoidalNatTrans.ext _ _ (funext w)
@[simp]
theorem comp_toNatTrans {F G H : BraidedFunctor C D} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} :
(α ≫ β).toNatTrans = @CategoryStruct.comp (C ⥤ D) _ _ _ _ α.toNatTrans β.toNatTrans :=
rfl
#align category_theory.braided_functor.comp_to_nat_trans CategoryTheory.BraidedFunctor.comp_toNatTrans
/-- Interpret a natural isomorphism of the underlying monoidal functors as an
isomorphism of the braided monoidal functors.
-/
@[simps]
def mkIso {F G : BraidedFunctor C D} (i : F.toMonoidalFunctor ≅ G.toMonoidalFunctor) : F ≅ G :=
{ i with }
#align category_theory.braided_functor.mk_iso CategoryTheory.BraidedFunctor.mkIso
end BraidedFunctor
section CommMonoid
variable (M : Type u) [CommMonoid M]
instance : BraidedCategory (Discrete M) where
braiding X Y := Discrete.eqToIso (mul_comm X.as Y.as)
variable {M} {N : Type u} [CommMonoid N]
/-- A multiplicative morphism between commutative monoids gives a braided functor between
the corresponding discrete braided monoidal categories.
-/
@[simps!]
def Discrete.braidedFunctor (F : M →* N) : BraidedFunctor (Discrete M) (Discrete N) :=
{ Discrete.monoidalFunctor F with }
#align category_theory.discrete.braided_functor CategoryTheory.Discrete.braidedFunctor
end CommMonoid
section Tensor
/-- The strength of the tensor product functor from `C × C` to `C`. -/
def tensor_μ (X Y : C × C) : (X.1 ⊗ X.2) ⊗ Y.1 ⊗ Y.2 ⟶ (X.1 ⊗ Y.1) ⊗ X.2 ⊗ Y.2 :=
(α_ X.1 X.2 (Y.1 ⊗ Y.2)).hom ≫
(X.1 ◁ (α_ X.2 Y.1 Y.2).inv) ≫
(X.1 ◁ (β_ X.2 Y.1).hom ▷ Y.2) ≫
(X.1 ◁ (α_ Y.1 X.2 Y.2).hom) ≫ (α_ X.1 Y.1 (X.2 ⊗ Y.2)).inv
#align category_theory.tensor_μ CategoryTheory.tensor_μ
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_μ_natural {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ U₁ U₂ V₁ V₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : U₁ ⟶ V₁)
(g₂ : U₂ ⟶ V₂) :
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ g₁ ⊗ g₂) ≫ tensor_μ C (Y₁, Y₂) (V₁, V₂) =
tensor_μ C (X₁, X₂) (U₁, U₂) ≫ ((f₁ ⊗ g₁) ⊗ f₂ ⊗ g₂) := by
dsimp only [tensor_μ]
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← tensor_comp, comp_id f₁, ← id_comp f₁, associator_inv_naturality, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← tensor_comp, ← tensor_comp, comp_id f₁, ← id_comp f₁, comp_id g₂, ← id_comp g₂,
braiding_naturality, tensor_comp, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 4 5 => rw [← tensor_comp, comp_id f₁, ← id_comp f₁, associator_naturality, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 5 6 => rw [associator_inv_naturality]
simp only [assoc]
#align category_theory.tensor_μ_natural CategoryTheory.tensor_μ_natural
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_μ_natural_left {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f₁: X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (Z₁ Z₂ : C) :
(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ▷ (Z₁ ⊗ Z₂) ≫ tensor_μ C (Y₁, Y₂) (Z₁, Z₂) =
tensor_μ C (X₁, X₂) (Z₁, Z₂) ≫ (f₁ ▷ Z₁ ⊗ f₂ ▷ Z₂) := by
convert tensor_μ_natural C f₁ f₂ (𝟙 Z₁) (𝟙 Z₂) using 1 <;> simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_μ_natural_right (Z₁ Z₂ : C) {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
(Z₁ ⊗ Z₂) ◁ (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ tensor_μ C (Z₁, Z₂) (Y₁, Y₂) =
tensor_μ C (Z₁, Z₂) (X₁, X₂) ≫ (Z₁ ◁ f₁ ⊗ Z₂ ◁ f₂) := by
convert tensor_μ_natural C (𝟙 Z₁) (𝟙 Z₂) f₁ f₂ using 1 <;> simp
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Braided/Basic.lean | 576 | 590 | theorem tensor_left_unitality (X₁ X₂ : C) :
(λ_ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)).hom =
((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ▷ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)) ≫
tensor_μ C (𝟙_ C, 𝟙_ C) (X₁, X₂) ≫ ((λ_ X₁).hom ⊗ (λ_ X₂).hom) := by |
dsimp only [tensor_μ]
have :
((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ▷ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)) ≫
(α_ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) (X₁ ⊗ X₂)).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X₁ X₂).inv) =
𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X₁).inv ▷ X₂ := by
coherence
slice_rhs 1 3 => rw [this]
clear this
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, ← comp_whiskerRight,
leftUnitor_inv_braiding]
simp [tensorHom_id, id_tensorHom, tensorHom_def]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# Borel (measurable) spaces ℝ, ℝ≥0, ℝ≥0∞
## Main statements
* `borel_eq_generateFrom_Ixx_rat` (where Ixx is one of {Ioo, Ioi, Iio, Ici, Iic):
the Borel sigma algebra on ℝ is generated by intervals with rational endpoints;
* `isPiSystem_Ixx_rat` (where Ixx is one of {Ioo, Ioi, Iio, Ici, Iic):
intervals with rational endpoints form a pi system on ℝ;
* `measurable_real_toNNReal`, `measurable_coe_nnreal_real`, `measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal`,
`ENNReal.measurable_ofReal`, `ENNReal.measurable_toReal`:
measurability of various coercions between ℝ, ℝ≥0, and ℝ≥0∞;
* `Measurable.real_toNNReal`, `Measurable.coe_nnreal_real`, `Measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal`,
`Measurable.ennreal_ofReal`, `Measurable.ennreal_toNNReal`, `Measurable.ennreal_toReal`:
measurability of functions composed with various coercions between ℝ, ℝ≥0, and ℝ≥0∞
(also similar results for a.e.-measurability);
* `Measurable.ennreal*` : measurability of special cases for arithmetic operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
namespace Real
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioo_rat :
borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ (a : ℚ) (b : ℚ) (_ : a < b), {Ioo (a : ℝ) (b : ℝ)}) :=
isTopologicalBasis_Ioo_rat.borel_eq_generateFrom
#align real.borel_eq_generate_from_Ioo_rat Real.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioo_rat
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Iio (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio]
refine le_antisymm
(generateFrom_le ?_)
(generateFrom_mono <| iUnion_subset fun q ↦ singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| mem_range_self _)
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
have : IsLUB (range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) ∩ Iio a) a := by
simp [isLUB_iff_le_iff, mem_upperBounds, ← le_iff_forall_rat_lt_imp_le]
rw [← this.biUnion_Iio_eq, ← image_univ, ← image_inter_preimage, univ_inter, biUnion_image]
exact MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable _)
fun b _ => GenerateMeasurable.basic (Iio (b : ℝ)) (by simp)
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Ioi (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine le_antisymm
(generateFrom_le ?_)
(generateFrom_mono <| iUnion_subset fun q ↦ singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| mem_range_self _)
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
have : IsGLB (range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) ∩ Ioi a) a := by
simp [isGLB_iff_le_iff, mem_lowerBounds, ← le_iff_forall_lt_rat_imp_le]
rw [← this.biUnion_Ioi_eq, ← image_univ, ← image_inter_preimage, univ_inter, biUnion_image]
exact MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable _)
fun b _ => GenerateMeasurable.basic (Ioi (b : ℝ)) (by simp)
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Iic (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi_rat, iUnion_singleton_eq_range, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_le ?_) (generateFrom_le ?_) <;>
rintro _ ⟨q, rfl⟩ <;>
dsimp only <;>
[rw [← compl_Iic]; rw [← compl_Ioi]] <;>
exact MeasurableSet.compl (GenerateMeasurable.basic _ (mem_range_self q))
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Ici (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio_rat, iUnion_singleton_eq_range, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_le ?_) (generateFrom_le ?_) <;>
rintro _ ⟨q, rfl⟩ <;>
dsimp only <;>
[rw [← compl_Ici]; rw [← compl_Iio]] <;>
exact MeasurableSet.compl (GenerateMeasurable.basic _ (mem_range_self q))
theorem isPiSystem_Ioo_rat :
IsPiSystem (⋃ (a : ℚ) (b : ℚ) (_ : a < b), {Ioo (a : ℝ) (b : ℝ)}) := by
convert isPiSystem_Ioo ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
ext x
simp [eq_comm]
#align real.is_pi_system_Ioo_rat Real.isPiSystem_Ioo_rat
theorem isPiSystem_Iio_rat : IsPiSystem (⋃ a : ℚ, {Iio (a : ℝ)}) := by
convert isPiSystem_image_Iio (((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) '' univ)
ext x
simp only [iUnion_singleton_eq_range, mem_range, image_univ, mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and]
theorem isPiSystem_Ioi_rat : IsPiSystem (⋃ a : ℚ, {Ioi (a : ℝ)}) := by
convert isPiSystem_image_Ioi (((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) '' univ)
ext x
simp only [iUnion_singleton_eq_range, mem_range, image_univ, mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Real.lean | 101 | 104 | theorem isPiSystem_Iic_rat : IsPiSystem (⋃ a : ℚ, {Iic (a : ℝ)}) := by |
convert isPiSystem_image_Iic (((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) '' univ)
ext x
simp only [iUnion_singleton_eq_range, mem_range, image_univ, mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
#align_import number_theory.zsqrtd.gaussian_int from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
/-!
# Gaussian integers
The Gaussian integers are complex integer, complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are both
integers.
## Main definitions
The Euclidean domain structure on `ℤ[i]` is defined in this file.
The homomorphism `GaussianInt.toComplex` into the complex numbers is also defined in this file.
## See also
See `NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.QuadraticReciprocity` for:
* `prime_iff_mod_four_eq_three_of_nat_prime`:
A prime natural number is prime in `ℤ[i]` if and only if it is `3` mod `4`
## Notations
This file uses the local notation `ℤ[i]` for `GaussianInt`
## Implementation notes
Gaussian integers are implemented using the more general definition `Zsqrtd`, the type of integers
adjoined a square root of `d`, in this case `-1`. The definition is reducible, so that properties
and definitions about `Zsqrtd` can easily be used.
-/
open Zsqrtd Complex
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The Gaussian integers, defined as `ℤ√(-1)`. -/
abbrev GaussianInt : Type :=
Zsqrtd (-1)
#align gaussian_int GaussianInt
local notation "ℤ[i]" => GaussianInt
namespace GaussianInt
instance : Repr ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x _ => "⟨" ++ repr x.re ++ ", " ++ repr x.im ++ "⟩"⟩
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ[i] :=
Zsqrtd.commRing
#align gaussian_int.comm_ring GaussianInt.instCommRing
section
attribute [-instance] Complex.instField -- Avoid making things noncomputable unnecessarily.
/-- The embedding of the Gaussian integers into the complex numbers, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def toComplex : ℤ[i] →+* ℂ :=
Zsqrtd.lift ⟨I, by simp⟩
#align gaussian_int.to_complex GaussianInt.toComplex
end
instance : Coe ℤ[i] ℂ :=
⟨toComplex⟩
theorem toComplex_def (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = x.re + x.im * I :=
rfl
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_def GaussianInt.toComplex_def
theorem toComplex_def' (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y * I := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_def' GaussianInt.toComplex_def'
theorem toComplex_def₂ (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = ⟨x.re, x.im⟩ := by
apply Complex.ext <;> simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_def₂ GaussianInt.toComplex_def₂
@[simp]
theorem to_real_re (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.re : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).re := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_real_re GaussianInt.to_real_re
@[simp]
theorem to_real_im (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.im : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).im := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_real_im GaussianInt.to_real_im
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_re (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re = x := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_re GaussianInt.toComplex_re
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_im (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im = y := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_im GaussianInt.toComplex_im
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_add (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x + y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y :=
toComplex.map_add _ _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_add GaussianInt.toComplex_add
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_mul (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x * y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x * y :=
toComplex.map_mul _ _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_mul GaussianInt.toComplex_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_one : ((1 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 1 :=
toComplex.map_one
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_one GaussianInt.toComplex_one
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_zero : ((0 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 0 :=
toComplex.map_zero
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_zero GaussianInt.toComplex_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_neg (x : ℤ[i]) : ((-x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = -x :=
toComplex.map_neg _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_neg GaussianInt.toComplex_neg
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_sub (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x - y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x - y :=
toComplex.map_sub _ _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_sub GaussianInt.toComplex_sub
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_star (x : ℤ[i]) : ((star x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = conj (x : ℂ) := by
rw [toComplex_def₂, toComplex_def₂]
exact congr_arg₂ _ rfl (Int.cast_neg _)
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_star GaussianInt.toComplex_star
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_inj {x y : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = y ↔ x = y := by
cases x; cases y; simp [toComplex_def₂]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_inj GaussianInt.toComplex_inj
lemma toComplex_injective : Function.Injective GaussianInt.toComplex :=
fun ⦃_ _⦄ ↦ toComplex_inj.mp
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_eq_zero {x : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← toComplex_zero, toComplex_inj]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_eq_zero GaussianInt.toComplex_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem intCast_real_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm : ℝ) = Complex.normSq (x : ℂ) := by
rw [Zsqrtd.norm, normSq]; simp
#align gaussian_int.nat_cast_real_norm GaussianInt.intCast_real_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_real_norm := intCast_real_norm
@[simp]
theorem intCast_complex_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm : ℂ) = Complex.normSq (x : ℂ) := by
cases x; rw [Zsqrtd.norm, normSq]; simp
#align gaussian_int.nat_cast_complex_norm GaussianInt.intCast_complex_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_complex_norm := intCast_complex_norm
theorem norm_nonneg (x : ℤ[i]) : 0 ≤ norm x :=
Zsqrtd.norm_nonneg (by norm_num) _
#align gaussian_int.norm_nonneg GaussianInt.norm_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_zero {x : ℤ[i]} : norm x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← @Int.cast_inj ℝ _ _ _]; simp
#align gaussian_int.norm_eq_zero GaussianInt.norm_eq_zero
theorem norm_pos {x : ℤ[i]} : 0 < norm x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm, norm_eq_zero]; simp [norm_nonneg]
#align gaussian_int.norm_pos GaussianInt.norm_pos
theorem abs_natCast_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm.natAbs : ℤ) = x.norm :=
Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)
#align gaussian_int.abs_coe_nat_norm GaussianInt.abs_natCast_norm
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated] alias abs_coe_nat_norm := abs_natCast_norm
@[simp]
theorem natCast_natAbs_norm {α : Type*} [Ring α] (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm.natAbs : α) = x.norm := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, abs_natCast_norm]
#align gaussian_int.nat_cast_nat_abs_norm GaussianInt.natCast_natAbs_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_natAbs_norm := natCast_natAbs_norm
theorem natAbs_norm_eq (x : ℤ[i]) :
x.norm.natAbs = x.re.natAbs * x.re.natAbs + x.im.natAbs * x.im.natAbs :=
Int.ofNat.inj <| by simp; simp [Zsqrtd.norm]
#align gaussian_int.nat_abs_norm_eq GaussianInt.natAbs_norm_eq
instance : Div ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x y =>
let n := (norm y : ℚ)⁻¹
let c := star y
⟨round ((x * c).re * n : ℚ), round ((x * c).im * n : ℚ)⟩⟩
theorem div_def (x y : ℤ[i]) :
x / y = ⟨round ((x * star y).re / norm y : ℚ), round ((x * star y).im / norm y : ℚ)⟩ :=
show Zsqrtd.mk _ _ = _ by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align gaussian_int.div_def GaussianInt.div_def
theorem toComplex_div_re (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re = round (x / y : ℂ).re := by
rw [div_def, ← @Rat.round_cast ℝ _ _]
simp [-Rat.round_cast, mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_add, add_mul]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_div_re GaussianInt.toComplex_div_re
theorem toComplex_div_im (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im = round (x / y : ℂ).im := by
rw [div_def, ← @Rat.round_cast ℝ _ _, ← @Rat.round_cast ℝ _ _]
simp [-Rat.round_cast, mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_add, add_mul]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_div_im GaussianInt.toComplex_div_im
theorem normSq_le_normSq_of_re_le_of_im_le {x y : ℂ} (hre : |x.re| ≤ |y.re|)
(him : |x.im| ≤ |y.im|) : Complex.normSq x ≤ Complex.normSq y := by
rw [normSq_apply, normSq_apply, ← _root_.abs_mul_self, _root_.abs_mul, ←
_root_.abs_mul_self y.re, _root_.abs_mul y.re, ← _root_.abs_mul_self x.im,
_root_.abs_mul x.im, ← _root_.abs_mul_self y.im, _root_.abs_mul y.im]
exact
add_le_add (mul_self_le_mul_self (abs_nonneg _) hre) (mul_self_le_mul_self (abs_nonneg _) him)
#align gaussian_int.norm_sq_le_norm_sq_of_re_le_of_im_le GaussianInt.normSq_le_normSq_of_re_le_of_im_le
theorem normSq_div_sub_div_lt_one (x y : ℤ[i]) :
Complex.normSq ((x / y : ℂ) - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ)) < 1 :=
calc
Complex.normSq ((x / y : ℂ) - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ))
_ = Complex.normSq
((x / y : ℂ).re - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re + ((x / y : ℂ).im - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im) *
I : ℂ) :=
congr_arg _ <| by apply Complex.ext <;> simp
_ ≤ Complex.normSq (1 / 2 + 1 / 2 * I) := by
have : |(2⁻¹ : ℝ)| = 2⁻¹ := abs_of_nonneg (by norm_num)
exact normSq_le_normSq_of_re_le_of_im_le
(by rw [toComplex_div_re]; simp [normSq, this]; simpa using abs_sub_round (x / y : ℂ).re)
(by rw [toComplex_div_im]; simp [normSq, this]; simpa using abs_sub_round (x / y : ℂ).im)
_ < 1 := by simp [normSq]; norm_num
#align gaussian_int.norm_sq_div_sub_div_lt_one GaussianInt.normSq_div_sub_div_lt_one
instance : Mod ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x y => x - y * (x / y)⟩
theorem mod_def (x y : ℤ[i]) : x % y = x - y * (x / y) :=
rfl
#align gaussian_int.mod_def GaussianInt.mod_def
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/GaussianInt.lean | 254 | 263 | theorem norm_mod_lt (x : ℤ[i]) {y : ℤ[i]} (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x % y).norm < y.norm :=
have : (y : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by | rwa [Ne, ← toComplex_zero, toComplex_inj]
(@Int.cast_lt ℝ _ _ _ _).1 <|
calc
↑(Zsqrtd.norm (x % y)) = Complex.normSq (x - y * (x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) := by simp [mod_def]
_ = Complex.normSq (y : ℂ) * Complex.normSq (x / y - (x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) := by
rw [← normSq_mul, mul_sub, mul_div_cancel₀ _ this]
_ < Complex.normSq (y : ℂ) * 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (normSq_div_sub_div_lt_one _ _) (normSq_pos.2 this))
_ = Zsqrtd.norm y := by simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Chris Hughes, Jens Wagemaker, Jon Eugster
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
#align_import algebra.group.units from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Units (i.e., invertible elements) of a monoid
An element of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse.
## Main declarations
* `Units M`: the group of units (i.e., invertible elements) of a monoid.
* `IsUnit x`: a predicate asserting that `x` is a unit (i.e., invertible element) of a monoid.
For both declarations, there is an additive counterpart: `AddUnits` and `IsAddUnit`.
See also `Prime`, `Associated`, and `Irreducible` in `Mathlib.Algebra.Associated`.
## Notation
We provide `Mˣ` as notation for `Units M`,
resembling the notation $R^{\times}$ for the units of a ring, which is common in mathematics.
## TODO
The results here should be used to golf the basic `Group` lemmas.
-/
assert_not_exists Multiplicative
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- Units of a `Monoid`, bundled version. Notation: `αˣ`.
An element of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse.
This version bundles the inverse element so that it can be computed.
For a predicate see `IsUnit`. -/
structure Units (α : Type u) [Monoid α] where
/-- The underlying value in the base `Monoid`. -/
val : α
/-- The inverse value of `val` in the base `Monoid`. -/
inv : α
/-- `inv` is the right inverse of `val` in the base `Monoid`. -/
val_inv : val * inv = 1
/-- `inv` is the left inverse of `val` in the base `Monoid`. -/
inv_val : inv * val = 1
#align units Units
#align units.val Units.val
#align units.inv Units.inv
#align units.val_inv Units.val_inv
#align units.inv_val Units.inv_val
attribute [coe] Units.val
@[inherit_doc]
postfix:1024 "ˣ" => Units
-- We don't provide notation for the additive version, because its use is somewhat rare.
/-- Units of an `AddMonoid`, bundled version.
An element of an `AddMonoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided additive inverse.
This version bundles the inverse element so that it can be computed.
For a predicate see `isAddUnit`. -/
structure AddUnits (α : Type u) [AddMonoid α] where
/-- The underlying value in the base `AddMonoid`. -/
val : α
/-- The additive inverse value of `val` in the base `AddMonoid`. -/
neg : α
/-- `neg` is the right additive inverse of `val` in the base `AddMonoid`. -/
val_neg : val + neg = 0
/-- `neg` is the left additive inverse of `val` in the base `AddMonoid`. -/
neg_val : neg + val = 0
#align add_units AddUnits
#align add_units.val AddUnits.val
#align add_units.neg AddUnits.neg
#align add_units.val_neg AddUnits.val_neg
#align add_units.neg_val AddUnits.neg_val
attribute [to_additive] Units
attribute [coe] AddUnits.val
section HasElem
@[to_additive]
theorem unique_one {α : Type*} [Unique α] [One α] : default = (1 : α) :=
Unique.default_eq 1
#align unique_has_one unique_one
#align unique_has_zero unique_zero
end HasElem
namespace Units
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α]
-- Porting note: unclear whether this should be a `CoeHead` or `CoeTail`
/-- A unit can be interpreted as a term in the base `Monoid`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive unit can be interpreted as a term in the base `AddMonoid`."]
instance : CoeHead αˣ α :=
⟨val⟩
/-- The inverse of a unit in a `Monoid`. -/
@[to_additive "The additive inverse of an additive unit in an `AddMonoid`."]
instance instInv : Inv αˣ :=
⟨fun u => ⟨u.2, u.1, u.4, u.3⟩⟩
attribute [instance] AddUnits.instNeg
/- porting note: the result of these definitions is syntactically equal to `Units.val` because of
the way coercions work in Lean 4, so there is no need for these custom `simp` projections. -/
#noalign units.simps.coe
#noalign add_units.simps.coe
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
@[to_additive "See Note [custom simps projection]"]
def Simps.val_inv (u : αˣ) : α := ↑(u⁻¹)
#align units.simps.coe_inv Units.Simps.val_inv
#align add_units.simps.coe_neg AddUnits.Simps.val_neg
initialize_simps_projections Units (as_prefix val, val_inv → null, inv → val_inv, as_prefix val_inv)
initialize_simps_projections AddUnits
(as_prefix val, val_neg → null, neg → val_neg, as_prefix val_neg)
-- Porting note: removed `simp` tag because of the tautology
@[to_additive]
theorem val_mk (a : α) (b h₁ h₂) : ↑(Units.mk a b h₁ h₂) = a :=
rfl
#align units.coe_mk Units.val_mk
#align add_units.coe_mk AddUnits.val_mk
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext : Function.Injective (val : αˣ → α)
| ⟨v, i₁, vi₁, iv₁⟩, ⟨v', i₂, vi₂, iv₂⟩, e => by
simp only at e; subst v'; congr;
simpa only [iv₂, vi₁, one_mul, mul_one] using mul_assoc i₂ v i₁
#align units.ext Units.ext
#align add_units.ext AddUnits.ext
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
theorem eq_iff {a b : αˣ} : (a : α) = b ↔ a = b :=
ext.eq_iff
#align units.eq_iff Units.eq_iff
#align add_units.eq_iff AddUnits.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff {a b : αˣ} : a = b ↔ (a : α) = b :=
eq_iff.symm
#align units.ext_iff Units.ext_iff
#align add_units.ext_iff AddUnits.ext_iff
/-- Units have decidable equality if the base `Monoid` has decidable equality. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units have decidable equality
if the base `AddMonoid` has deciable equality."]
instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq αˣ := fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ ext_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_val (u : αˣ) (y h₁ h₂) : mk (u : α) y h₁ h₂ = u :=
ext rfl
#align units.mk_coe Units.mk_val
#align add_units.mk_coe AddUnits.mk_val
/-- Copy a unit, adjusting definition equalities. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "Copy an `AddUnit`, adjusting definitional equalities."]
def copy (u : αˣ) (val : α) (hv : val = u) (inv : α) (hi : inv = ↑u⁻¹) : αˣ :=
{ val, inv, inv_val := hv.symm ▸ hi.symm ▸ u.inv_val, val_inv := hv.symm ▸ hi.symm ▸ u.val_inv }
#align units.copy Units.copy
#align add_units.copy AddUnits.copy
#align units.coe_copy Units.val_copy
#align add_units.coe_copy AddUnits.val_copy
#align units.coe_inv_copy Units.val_inv_copy
#align add_units.coe_neg_copy AddUnits.val_neg_copy
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (u : αˣ) (val hv inv hi) : u.copy val hv inv hi = u :=
ext hv
#align units.copy_eq Units.copy_eq
#align add_units.copy_eq AddUnits.copy_eq
/-- Units of a monoid have an induced multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid have an induced addition."]
instance : Mul αˣ where
mul u₁ u₂ :=
⟨u₁.val * u₂.val, u₂.inv * u₁.inv,
by rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc u₂.val, val_inv, one_mul, val_inv],
by rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc u₁.inv, inv_val, one_mul, inv_val]⟩
/-- Units of a monoid have a unit -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid have a zero."]
instance : One αˣ where
one := ⟨1, 1, one_mul 1, one_mul 1⟩
/-- Units of a monoid have a multiplication and multiplicative identity. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid have an addition and an additive identity."]
instance instMulOneClass : MulOneClass αˣ where
one_mul u := ext <| one_mul (u : α)
mul_one u := ext <| mul_one (u : α)
/-- Units of a monoid are inhabited because `1` is a unit. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid are inhabited because `0` is an additive unit."]
instance : Inhabited αˣ :=
⟨1⟩
/-- Units of a monoid have a representation of the base value in the `Monoid`. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid have a representation of the base value in
the `AddMonoid`."]
instance [Repr α] : Repr αˣ :=
⟨reprPrec ∘ val⟩
variable (a b c : αˣ) {u : αˣ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem val_mul : (↑(a * b) : α) = a * b :=
rfl
#align units.coe_mul Units.val_mul
#align add_units.coe_add AddUnits.val_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem val_one : ((1 : αˣ) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align units.coe_one Units.val_one
#align add_units.coe_zero AddUnits.val_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem val_eq_one {a : αˣ} : (a : α) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← Units.val_one, eq_iff]
#align units.coe_eq_one Units.val_eq_one
#align add_units.coe_eq_zero AddUnits.val_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mk (x y : α) (h₁ h₂) : (mk x y h₁ h₂)⁻¹ = mk y x h₂ h₁ :=
rfl
#align units.inv_mk Units.inv_mk
#align add_units.neg_mk AddUnits.neg_mk
-- Porting note: coercions are now eagerly elaborated, so no need for `val_eq_coe`
#noalign units.val_eq_coe
#noalign add_units.val_eq_coe
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_val_inv : a.inv = ((a⁻¹ : αˣ) : α) :=
rfl
#align units.inv_eq_coe_inv Units.inv_eq_val_inv
#align add_units.neg_eq_coe_neg AddUnits.neg_eq_val_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul : (↑a⁻¹ * a : α) = 1 :=
inv_val _
#align units.inv_mul Units.inv_mul
#align add_units.neg_add AddUnits.neg_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv : (a * ↑a⁻¹ : α) = 1 :=
val_inv _
#align units.mul_inv Units.mul_inv
#align add_units.add_neg AddUnits.add_neg
@[to_additive] lemma commute_coe_inv : Commute (a : α) ↑a⁻¹ := by
rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, inv_mul, mul_inv]
@[to_additive] lemma commute_inv_coe : Commute ↑a⁻¹ (a : α) := a.commute_coe_inv.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_of_eq {a : α} (h : ↑u = a) : ↑u⁻¹ * a = 1 := by rw [← h, u.inv_mul]
#align units.inv_mul_of_eq Units.inv_mul_of_eq
#align add_units.neg_add_of_eq AddUnits.neg_add_of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_of_eq {a : α} (h : ↑u = a) : a * ↑u⁻¹ = 1 := by rw [← h, u.mul_inv]
#align units.mul_inv_of_eq Units.mul_inv_of_eq
#align add_units.add_neg_of_eq AddUnits.add_neg_of_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left (a : αˣ) (b : α) : (a : α) * (↑a⁻¹ * b) = b := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_inv, one_mul]
#align units.mul_inv_cancel_left Units.mul_inv_cancel_left
#align add_units.add_neg_cancel_left AddUnits.add_neg_cancel_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left (a : αˣ) (b : α) : (↑a⁻¹ : α) * (a * b) = b := by
rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul, one_mul]
#align units.inv_mul_cancel_left Units.inv_mul_cancel_left
#align add_units.neg_add_cancel_left AddUnits.neg_add_cancel_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right (a : α) (b : αˣ) : a * b * ↑b⁻¹ = a := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv, mul_one]
#align units.mul_inv_cancel_right Units.mul_inv_cancel_right
#align add_units.add_neg_cancel_right AddUnits.add_neg_cancel_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right (a : α) (b : αˣ) : a * ↑b⁻¹ * b = a := by
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul, mul_one]
#align units.inv_mul_cancel_right Units.inv_mul_cancel_right
#align add_units.neg_add_cancel_right AddUnits.neg_add_cancel_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_right_inj (a : αˣ) {b c : α} : (a : α) * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left] using congr_arg (fun x : α => ↑(a⁻¹ : αˣ) * x) h,
congr_arg _⟩
#align units.mul_right_inj Units.mul_right_inj
#align add_units.add_right_inj AddUnits.add_right_inj
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_left_inj (a : αˣ) {b c : α} : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right] using congr_arg (fun x : α => x * ↑(a⁻¹ : αˣ)) h,
congr_arg (· * a.val)⟩
#align units.mul_left_inj Units.mul_left_inj
#align add_units.add_left_inj AddUnits.add_left_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq {a b : α} : a = b * ↑c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
#align units.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq Units.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq
#align add_units.eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq AddUnits.eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq {a c : α} : a = ↑b⁻¹ * c ↔ ↑b * a = c :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
#align units.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq Units.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq
#align add_units.eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq AddUnits.eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul {b c : α} : ↑a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
#align units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul Units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align add_units.neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add AddUnits.neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul {a c : α} : a * ↑b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
#align units.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul Units.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align add_units.add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add AddUnits.add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add
-- Porting note: have to explicitly type annotate the 1
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left {a : α} (h : a * u = 1) : ↑u⁻¹ = a :=
calc
↑u⁻¹ = (1 : α) * ↑u⁻¹ := by rw [one_mul]
_ = a := by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]
#align units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left Units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left
#align add_units.neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_left AddUnits.neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_left
-- Porting note: have to explicitly type annotate the 1
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right {a : α} (h : ↑u * a = 1) : ↑u⁻¹ = a :=
calc
↑u⁻¹ = ↑u⁻¹ * (1 : α) := by rw [mul_one]
_ = a := by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right Units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
#align add_units.neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_right AddUnits.neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_right
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left {a : α} (h : ↑u * a = 1) : a = ↑u⁻¹ :=
(Units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
#align units.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left Units.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
#align add_units.eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left AddUnits.eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right {a : α} (h : a * u = 1) : a = ↑u⁻¹ :=
(Units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left h).symm
#align units.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right Units.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right
#align add_units.eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right AddUnits.eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right
@[to_additive]
instance instMonoid : Monoid αˣ :=
{ (inferInstance : MulOneClass αˣ) with
mul_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext <| mul_assoc _ _ _,
npow := fun n a ↦
{ val := a ^ n
inv := a⁻¹ ^ n
val_inv := by rw [← a.commute_coe_inv.mul_pow]; simp
inv_val := by rw [← a.commute_inv_coe.mul_pow]; simp }
npow_zero := fun a ↦ by ext; simp
npow_succ := fun n a ↦ by ext; simp [pow_succ] }
/-- Units of a monoid have division -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid have subtraction."]
instance : Div αˣ where
div := fun a b ↦
{ val := a * b⁻¹
inv := b * a⁻¹
val_inv := by rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left, mul_inv]
inv_val := by rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left, mul_inv] }
/-- Units of a monoid form a `DivInvMonoid`. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid form a `SubNegMonoid`."]
instance instDivInvMonoid : DivInvMonoid αˣ where
zpow := fun n a ↦ match n, a with
| Int.ofNat n, a => a ^ n
| Int.negSucc n, a => (a ^ n.succ)⁻¹
zpow_zero' := fun a ↦ by simp
zpow_succ' := fun n a ↦ by simp [pow_succ]
zpow_neg' := fun n a ↦ by simp
/-- Units of a monoid form a group. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive monoid form an additive group."]
instance instGroup : Group αˣ where
mul_left_inv := fun u => ext u.inv_val
/-- Units of a commutative monoid form a commutative group. -/
@[to_additive "Additive units of an additive commutative monoid form
an additive commutative group."]
instance instCommGroupUnits {α} [CommMonoid α] : CommGroup αˣ where
mul_comm := fun _ _ => ext <| mul_comm _ _
#align units.comm_group Units.instCommGroupUnits
#align add_units.add_comm_group AddUnits.instAddCommGroupAddUnits
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma val_pow_eq_pow_val (n : ℕ) : ↑(a ^ n) = (a ^ n : α) := rfl
#align units.coe_pow Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val
#align add_units.coe_nsmul AddUnits.val_nsmul_eq_nsmul_val
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {a : α} : a * ↑u⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = u :=
⟨inv_inv u ▸ Units.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right, fun h => mul_inv_of_eq h.symm⟩
#align units.mul_inv_eq_one Units.mul_inv_eq_one
#align add_units.add_neg_eq_zero AddUnits.add_neg_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_eq_one {a : α} : ↑u⁻¹ * a = 1 ↔ ↑u = a :=
⟨inv_inv u ▸ Units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right, inv_mul_of_eq⟩
#align units.inv_mul_eq_one Units.inv_mul_eq_one
#align add_units.neg_add_eq_zero AddUnits.neg_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv {a : α} : a * u = 1 ↔ a = ↑u⁻¹ := by rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, inv_inv]
#align units.mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv Units.mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv
#align add_units.add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg AddUnits.add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq {a : α} : ↑u * a = 1 ↔ ↑u⁻¹ = a := by rw [← inv_mul_eq_one, inv_inv]
#align units.mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq Units.mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq
#align add_units.add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq AddUnits.add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique {u₁ u₂ : αˣ} (h : (↑u₁ : α) = ↑u₂) : (↑u₁⁻¹ : α) = ↑u₂⁻¹ :=
Units.inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rw [h, u₂.mul_inv]
#align units.inv_unique Units.inv_unique
#align add_units.neg_unique AddUnits.neg_unique
end Monoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)] lemma val_inv_eq_inv_val (u : αˣ) : ↑u⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : α) :=
Eq.symm <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right u.mul_inv
#align units.coe_inv Units.val_inv_eq_inv_val
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma val_div_eq_div_val : ∀ u₁ u₂ : αˣ, ↑(u₁ / u₂) = (u₁ / u₂ : α) := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align units.coe_div Units.val_div_eq_div_val
#align add_units.coe_sub AddUnits.val_neg_eq_neg_val
end DivisionMonoid
end Units
/-- For `a, b` in a `CommMonoid` such that `a * b = 1`, makes a unit out of `a`. -/
@[to_additive
"For `a, b` in an `AddCommMonoid` such that `a + b = 0`, makes an addUnit out of `a`."]
def Units.mkOfMulEqOne [CommMonoid α] (a b : α) (hab : a * b = 1) : αˣ :=
⟨a, b, hab, (mul_comm b a).trans hab⟩
#align units.mk_of_mul_eq_one Units.mkOfMulEqOne
#align add_units.mk_of_add_eq_zero AddUnits.mkOfAddEqZero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} (h : a * b = 1) :
(Units.mkOfMulEqOne a b h : α) = a :=
rfl
#align units.coe_mk_of_mul_eq_one Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne
#align add_units.coe_mk_of_add_eq_zero AddUnits.val_mkOfAddEqZero
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {a b c : α}
/-- Partial division. It is defined when the
second argument is invertible, and unlike the division operator
in `DivisionRing` it is not totalized at zero. -/
def divp (a : α) (u : Units α) : α :=
a * (u⁻¹ : αˣ)
#align divp divp
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:70 " /ₚ " => divp
@[simp]
theorem divp_self (u : αˣ) : (u : α) /ₚ u = 1 :=
Units.mul_inv _
#align divp_self divp_self
@[simp]
theorem divp_one (a : α) : a /ₚ 1 = a :=
mul_one _
#align divp_one divp_one
theorem divp_assoc (a b : α) (u : αˣ) : a * b /ₚ u = a * (b /ₚ u) :=
mul_assoc _ _ _
#align divp_assoc divp_assoc
/-- `field_simp` needs the reverse direction of `divp_assoc` to move all `/ₚ` to the right. -/
@[field_simps]
theorem divp_assoc' (x y : α) (u : αˣ) : x * (y /ₚ u) = x * y /ₚ u :=
(divp_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align divp_assoc' divp_assoc'
@[simp]
theorem divp_inv (u : αˣ) : a /ₚ u⁻¹ = a * u :=
rfl
#align divp_inv divp_inv
@[simp]
theorem divp_mul_cancel (a : α) (u : αˣ) : a /ₚ u * u = a :=
(mul_assoc _ _ _).trans <| by rw [Units.inv_mul, mul_one]
#align divp_mul_cancel divp_mul_cancel
@[simp]
theorem mul_divp_cancel (a : α) (u : αˣ) : a * u /ₚ u = a :=
(mul_assoc _ _ _).trans <| by rw [Units.mul_inv, mul_one]
#align mul_divp_cancel mul_divp_cancel
@[simp]
theorem divp_left_inj (u : αˣ) {a b : α} : a /ₚ u = b /ₚ u ↔ a = b :=
Units.mul_left_inj _
#align divp_left_inj divp_left_inj
@[field_simps]
theorem divp_divp_eq_divp_mul (x : α) (u₁ u₂ : αˣ) : x /ₚ u₁ /ₚ u₂ = x /ₚ (u₂ * u₁) := by
simp only [divp, mul_inv_rev, Units.val_mul, mul_assoc]
#align divp_divp_eq_divp_mul divp_divp_eq_divp_mul
/- Porting note: to match the mathlib3 behavior, this needs to have higher simp
priority than eq_divp_iff_mul_eq. -/
@[field_simps 1010]
theorem divp_eq_iff_mul_eq {x : α} {u : αˣ} {y : α} : x /ₚ u = y ↔ y * u = x :=
u.mul_left_inj.symm.trans <| by rw [divp_mul_cancel]; exact ⟨Eq.symm, Eq.symm⟩
#align divp_eq_iff_mul_eq divp_eq_iff_mul_eq
@[field_simps]
theorem eq_divp_iff_mul_eq {x : α} {u : αˣ} {y : α} : x = y /ₚ u ↔ x * u = y := by
rw [eq_comm, divp_eq_iff_mul_eq]
#align eq_divp_iff_mul_eq eq_divp_iff_mul_eq
theorem divp_eq_one_iff_eq {a : α} {u : αˣ} : a /ₚ u = 1 ↔ a = u :=
(Units.mul_left_inj u).symm.trans <| by rw [divp_mul_cancel, one_mul]
#align divp_eq_one_iff_eq divp_eq_one_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem one_divp (u : αˣ) : 1 /ₚ u = ↑u⁻¹ :=
one_mul _
#align one_divp one_divp
/-- Used for `field_simp` to deal with inverses of units. -/
@[field_simps]
theorem inv_eq_one_divp (u : αˣ) : ↑u⁻¹ = 1 /ₚ u := by rw [one_divp]
#align inv_eq_one_divp inv_eq_one_divp
/-- Used for `field_simp` to deal with inverses of units. This form of the lemma
is essential since `field_simp` likes to use `inv_eq_one_div` to rewrite
`↑u⁻¹ = ↑(1 / u)`.
-/
@[field_simps]
theorem inv_eq_one_divp' (u : αˣ) : ((1 / u : αˣ) : α) = 1 /ₚ u := by
rw [one_div, one_divp]
#align inv_eq_one_divp' inv_eq_one_divp'
/-- `field_simp` moves division inside `αˣ` to the right, and this lemma
lifts the calculation to `α`.
-/
@[field_simps]
theorem val_div_eq_divp (u₁ u₂ : αˣ) : ↑(u₁ / u₂) = ↑u₁ /ₚ u₂ := by
rw [divp, division_def, Units.val_mul]
#align coe_div_eq_divp val_div_eq_divp
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
@[field_simps]
theorem divp_mul_eq_mul_divp (x y : α) (u : αˣ) : x /ₚ u * y = x * y /ₚ u := by
rw [divp, divp, mul_right_comm]
#align divp_mul_eq_mul_divp divp_mul_eq_mul_divp
-- Theoretically redundant as `field_simp` lemma.
@[field_simps]
theorem divp_eq_divp_iff {x y : α} {ux uy : αˣ} : x /ₚ ux = y /ₚ uy ↔ x * uy = y * ux := by
rw [divp_eq_iff_mul_eq, divp_mul_eq_mul_divp, divp_eq_iff_mul_eq]
#align divp_eq_divp_iff divp_eq_divp_iff
-- Theoretically redundant as `field_simp` lemma.
@[field_simps]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Units.lean | 609 | 610 | theorem divp_mul_divp (x y : α) (ux uy : αˣ) : x /ₚ ux * (y /ₚ uy) = x * y /ₚ (ux * uy) := by |
rw [divp_mul_eq_mul_divp, divp_assoc', divp_divp_eq_divp_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Indicator
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal
#align_import topology.semicontinuous from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Semicontinuous maps
A function `f` from a topological space `α` to an ordered space `β` is lower semicontinuous at a
point `x` if, for any `y < f x`, for any `x'` close enough to `x`, one has `f x' > y`. In other
words, `f` can jump up, but it can not jump down.
Upper semicontinuous functions are defined similarly.
This file introduces these notions, and a basic API around them mimicking the API for continuous
functions.
## Main definitions and results
We introduce 4 definitions related to lower semicontinuity:
* `LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousAt f x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousOn f s`
* `LowerSemicontinuous f`
We build a basic API using dot notation around these notions, and we prove that
* constant functions are lower semicontinuous;
* `indicator s (fun _ ↦ y)` is lower semicontinuous when `s` is open and `0 ≤ y`,
or when `s` is closed and `y ≤ 0`;
* continuous functions are lower semicontinuous;
* left composition with a continuous monotone functions maps lower semicontinuous functions to lower
semicontinuous functions. If the function is anti-monotone, it instead maps lower semicontinuous
functions to upper semicontinuous functions;
* right composition with continuous functions preserves lower and upper semicontinuity;
* a sum of two (or finitely many) lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* a supremum of a family of lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* An infinite sum of `ℝ≥0∞`-valued lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous.
Similar results are stated and proved for upper semicontinuity.
We also prove that a function is continuous if and only if it is both lower and upper
semicontinuous.
We have some equivalent definitions of lower- and upper-semicontinuity (under certain
restrictions on the order on the codomain):
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf` in a dense complete linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph` in a dense complete linear order with the order
topology.
## Implementation details
All the nontrivial results for upper semicontinuous functions are deduced from the corresponding
ones for lower semicontinuous functions using `OrderDual`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_convex_function>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-continuity>
-/
open Topology ENNReal
open Set Function Filter
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} {x : α}
{s t : Set α} {y z : β}
/-! ### Main definitions -/
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, y < f x'
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in
a general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
#align lower_semicontinuous_on LowerSemicontinuousOn
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, y < f x'
#align lower_semicontinuous_at LowerSemicontinuousAt
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, LowerSemicontinuousAt f x
#align lower_semicontinuous LowerSemicontinuous
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, f x' < y
#align upper_semicontinuous_within_at UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a
general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
#align upper_semicontinuous_on UpperSemicontinuousOn
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, f x' < y
#align upper_semicontinuous_at UpperSemicontinuousAt
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'`
close enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered
space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, UpperSemicontinuousAt f x
#align upper_semicontinuous UpperSemicontinuous
/-!
### Lower semicontinuous functions
-/
/-! #### Basic dot notation interface for lower semicontinuity -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at.mono LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt, LowerSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at_univ_iff lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
#align lower_semicontinuous_at.lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
#align lower_semicontinuous_on.lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
#align lower_semicontinuous_on.mono LowerSemicontinuousOn.mono
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : LowerSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ LowerSemicontinuous f := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousOn, LowerSemicontinuous, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
#align lower_semicontinuous_on_univ_iff lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
#align lower_semicontinuous.lower_semicontinuous_at LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s
#align lower_semicontinuous.lower_semicontinuous_within_at LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousOn (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
#align lower_semicontinuous.lower_semicontinuous_on LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousOn
/-! #### Constants -/
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.eventually_of_forall fun _x => hy
#align lower_semicontinuous_within_at_const lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun _x => z) x := fun _y hy =>
Filter.eventually_of_forall fun _x => hy
#align lower_semicontinuous_at_const lowerSemicontinuousAt_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_const : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun _x => z) s := fun _x _hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
#align lower_semicontinuous_on_const lowerSemicontinuousOn_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_const : LowerSemicontinuous fun _x : α => z := fun _x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_const
#align lower_semicontinuous_const lowerSemicontinuous_const
/-! #### Indicators -/
section
variable [Zero β]
| Mathlib/Topology/Semicontinuous.lean | 213 | 220 | theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by |
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· filter_upwards [hs.mem_nhds h]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [hz]
· refine Filter.eventually_of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz.trans_le hy, hz]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.